paper_id
stringlengths 9
16
| version
stringclasses 26
values | yymm
stringclasses 311
values | created
timestamp[s] | title
stringlengths 6
335
| secondary_subfield
sequencelengths 1
8
| abstract
stringlengths 25
3.93k
| primary_subfield
stringclasses 124
values | field
stringclasses 20
values | fulltext
stringlengths 0
2.84M
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1811.02849 | 1 | 1811 | 2018-11-07T11:46:06 | Thermophysical Modeling of Asteroid Surfaces using Ellipsoid Shape Models | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | Thermophysical Models (TPMs), which have proven to be a powerful tool in the interpretation of the infrared emission of asteroid surfaces, typically make use of a priori obtained shape models and spin axes for use as input boundary conditions. We test then employ a TPM approach - under an assumption of an ellipsoidal shape - that exploits the combination of thermal multi-wavelength observations obtained at pre- and post-opposition. Thermal infrared data, when available, at these observing circumstances are inherently advantageous in constraining thermal inertia and sense of spin, among other physical traits. We show that, despite the lack of a priori knowledge mentioned above, the size, albedo, and thermal inertia of an object are well-constrained with precision comparable to that of previous techniques. Useful estimates of the surface roughness, shape, and spin direction can also be made, to varying degrees of success. Applying the method to WISE observations, we present best-fit size, albedo, thermal inertia, surface roughness, shape elongation and sense of spin direction for 21 asteroids. We explore the thermal inertia's correlation with diameter, after accounting for its dependance on heliocentric distance. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | Thermophysical Modeling of Asteroid Surfaces using Ellipsoid Shape
Models
Eric M. MacLennana,∗, Joshua P. Emerya
aEarth and Planetary Sciences Department, Planetary Geosciences Institute, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
37996
8
1
0
2
v
o
N
7
.
]
P
E
h
p
-
o
r
t
s
a
[
1
v
9
4
8
2
0
.
1
1
8
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
Abstract
Thermophysical Models (TPMs), which have proven to be a powerful tool in the interpretation of the
infrared emission of asteroid surfaces, typically make use of a priori obtained shape models and spin axes
for use as input boundary conditions. We test then employ a TPM approach - under an assumption of an
ellipsoidal shape - that exploits the combination of thermal multi-wavelength observations obtained at pre-
and post-opposition. Thermal infrared data, when available, at these observing circumstances are inherently
advantageous in constraining thermal inertia and sense of spin, among other physical traits. We show that,
despite the lack of a priori knowledge mentioned above, the size, albedo, and thermal inertia of an object are
well-constrained with precision comparable to that of previous techniques. Useful estimates of the surface
roughness, shape, and spin direction can also be made, to varying degrees of success. Applying the method
to WISE observations, we present best-fit size, albedo, thermal inertia, surface roughness, shape elongation
and sense of spin direction for 21 asteroids. We explore the thermal inertia's correlation with asteroid
diameter, after accounting for its dependence on the heliocentric distance.
Keywords: Asteroids, Thermophysical Modeling, Thermal Inertia
1. Introduction
Multi-wavelength, photometric infrared observations of asteroids provide essential information about the
thermophyiscal properties of their surfaces. A handful of both simple thermal models (Harris, 1998; Lebofsky
et al., 1978, 1986; Wolters and Green, 2009; Myhrvold, 2016) and more sophisticated themophysical models
(TPMs; Spencer et al., 1989; Spencer, 1990; Lagerros, 1996; Delbo' et al., 2007; Mueller, 2007; Rozitis and
Green, 2011) have been established as effective means of modeling thermal infrared observations of asteroids.
The general purpose of a thermal model is to compute surface temperatures for an object, which are in turn
used to calculate the emitted flux at the desired wavelengths (see Delbo' et al., 2015, for a recent review).
Thermophysical models have proved to be a powerful tool in providing meaningful estimates of an object's
size and albedo and provide insight into thermophysical characteristics of asteroid regoliths (Emery et al.,
2014; Hanus et al., 2015, 2018; Landsman et al., 2018; Rozitis and Green, 2014; Rozitis et al., 2014, 2018).
Most simple thermal models assume an idealized (often spherical) object shape, instead of including a
priori knowledge of the shape, in order to estimate the diameter and albedo of an object. However, unlike
TPMs, simple thermal models lack the ability to estimate geologically-relevant thermophysical properties
such as the thermal inertia. TPMs require a spin vector - typically sourced from the Database of Asteroid
Models from Inversion Techniques (DAMIT1; Durech, 2010) - and object shape model as input (e.g., Hanus
et al., 2018).
∗corresponding author
Email address: [email protected] (Eric M. MacLennan)
URL: web.utk.edu/~emaclenn/home (Eric M. MacLennan)
1http://astro.troja.mff.cuni.cz/projects/asteroids3D/web.php
Preprint submitted to Astronomical Journal
November 8, 2018
With the recent surge in thermal infrared observations from large-scale surveys, an ever-increasing num-
ber of asteroids are being observed across several epochs, building up sets of observations that span both
pre- and post-opposition and often at large solar phase angles (Mainzer et al., 2011a). Such observations
provide additional constraints and/or allow for more free parameters in data-modeling inversion techniques.
However, the rate of thermal infrared observations significantly outpace the efforts to characterize the shapes
of individual asteroids. Advantages of multi-epoch observations have previously been noted (e.g. Spencer,
1990) and been used recently to derive thermophysical and spin properties of objects (Muller et al., 2011,
2014, 2017; Durech et al., 2017). These studies serve as the foundation on which we build a methodologi-
cal approach aimed at extracting important thermophysical properties from the large number of asteroids
observed at pre- and post-opposition at multiple thermal wavelengths often acquired from thermal infrared
surveys.
In this paper, we outline and test a TPM approach that utilizes pre- and post-opposition multi-wavelength
thermal observations when information about an object is limited. To do so, we use various simple shapes
(both spherical and prolate ellipsoids) of varying spin vectors. The goal of this work is to demonstrate
and establish the effectiveness of this modeling approach and compare it to previous studies. In section 2
we briefly review established thermal modeling techniques and their ability to constrain diameter, albedo,
thermal inertia, surface roughness, shape and spin direction - highlighting the use of pre-/post- opposition
observing geometries. We describe our thermophysical model and its implementation in section 3.
In
section 4 we implement and analyze the effectiveness of our approach to that of the previously reviewed
works. We then apply our modeling approach and present results for 21 asteroids in section 5. In a follow-up
paper, we will supplement the number of objects analyzed with this method by an order of magnitude.
2. Thermal Modeling Background and Motivation
A few simple thermal models and TPMs have been developed to estimate various physical and thermo-
phyphysical properties of asteroids. Many thermal models attempt to match a disk-integrated flux to a set of
telescopic observational data by calculating surface temperatures for a given shape. Simple thermal models
model surface temperatures by using closed-form equations (which can be evaluated in a finite number of
operations) based off of the equilibrium surface temperature (Teq), which is calculated via the energy balance
between the amount of absorbed insolation and emitted thermal energy:
S(cid:12)(1 − A)
R2
AU
− εBσT 4
eq = 0.
(1)
In equation (1), S(cid:12) is the solar constant at 1 AU (1367 Wm−2; Frohlich, 2009), A is the bolometric Bond
albedo, RAU is the heliocentric distance in Astronomical Units, εB is the bolometric emissivity, and σ is the
Stefan-Boltzmann constant. The "beaming parameter", η, modifies the energy balance in order to account
for various thermophysical effects that cause temperatures to depart from thermal equilibrium.
On the other hand, TPMs compute surface temperatures using Fourier's Law of heat-diffusion (evaluated
numerically). Well established simple thermal models include the Standard Thermal Model (STM; Lebofsky
et al., 1986, and references within), Near-Earth Asteroid Thermal Model (NEATM; Harris, 1998), and the
Fast Rotating Model (FRM; Lebofsky et al., 1978) More recently, the Night Emission Simulated Thermal
Model (NESTM; Wolters and Green, 2009)) and Generalized FRM (GFRM; Myhrvold, 2016) have been
created by modifying the NEATM and FRM, respectively. For reasons of applicability and flexibility,
especially when analyzing large datasets, the NEATM has been used most often (Trilling et al., 2010;
Mainzer et al., 2011b; Masiero et al., 2011). A brief description and history of the STM, FRM, and NEATM
can be found in Harris and Lagerros (2002). The NEATM has been the preferred simple thermal model
for multi-wavelength thermal surveys; due to the ease of application to single epoch observations of objects
for which no shape or spin information exists. But, a TPM is the preferred tool for interpreting the multi-
wavelength thermal observations of objects with shape and spin vector information.
2
2.1. Thermophysical Models
Many versions of TPMs, with varying levels of complexity, have been developed throughout the past
few decades. Such models explicitly account for the effects that physical attributes of the surface have
on the thermal emission (Spencer et al., 1989). Subsurface heat conduction, self-shadowing from direct
insolation (incoming solar radiation), multiply scattered insolation, and re-absorbed thermal radiation (i.e.
self-heating) are implemented in a multitude of ways. The energy conservation expressed by equation (1) is
amended to include additional terms that account for these effects:
(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)surf
S(cid:12)(1 − A)
R2
AU
cos(i)(1 − s) + Esolar
scat + Etherm
abs + k
dT
dx
− εBσT 4
surf = 0.
(2)
Where, k is the effective thermal conductivity, i is the angle between a surface facet's local zenith and
sun-direction (solar incidence angle), and s is a binary factor indicating whether an element is shadowed by
another facet (s = 1), or not (s = 0). The terms Esolar
encompass the contributed energy input
from scattered solar radiation and re-radiated thermal photons, respectively, from other surface elements.
Rough topography has been modeled as spherical section craters (Spencer, 1990; Emery et al., 1998), random
Gaussian surface (Rozitis and Green, 2011), and using fractal geometry (Davidsson and Rickman, 2014).
The mathematics and numerical implementations of these features differ somewhat from one another. For
further details, we refer the reader to the primary papers and to Davidsson et al. (2015) for a comparison
of the different implementations.
scat and Etherm
abs
TPMs often use the time-dependent, one-dimensional heat diffusion equation,
∂T (x, t)
∂t
=
k
ρc
∂2T (x, t)
∂x2
,
(3)
to model the flow of heat into and out from the subsurface. This presentation of Fourier's Law in equation (3)
assumes that the effective thermophysical factors (thermal conductivity, bulk density, ρ, and specific heat
capacity, c) do not vary with depth or temperature. One-directional heat flow into the subsurface is also
often assumed, but is well-justified by the concept that thermal energy flow is aligned with the temperature
gradient - either directly up or down beneath the surface.
In the subsections below, we review and assess how various physical parameters (diameter, albedo,
thermal inertia, surface roughness, shape, and spin direction) can be constrained in various observing cir-
cumstances. In particular, we highlight the optimal observing configurations and possible biases that may
arise from particular viewing geometries.
2.2. Diameter and Albedo
One of the primary motivations for developing thermal models was to obtain size estimates of objects from
disk-integrated thermal infrared observations (e.g. Allen, 1970; Morrison, 1973), since thermal flux emission
is directly proportional to the object's projected area (i.e. equation (18)). A single value of diameter is
not uniquely defined for a non-spherical body, so an effective diameter (Deff ) is given: the diameter of the
sphere (Mueller, 2007) having the same projected area as the object. During the span of data collection for
a non-spherical body, the projected area will almost never be constant. In this case, Deff is best reported as
a time-averaged value, or adjusted using visible lightcurve data obtained simultaneously or proximal in time
to the thermal observations (e.g. Lebofsky and Rieke, 1979; Harris and Davies, 1999; Delbo' et al., 2003;
Lim et al., 2011). If a detailed shape model is being used, then the rotational phase of the object can be
shifted in order to match the time-varying flux (Al´ı-Lagoa et al., 2013).
Geometric albedo (pV ) is calculated directly from Deff and the object's absolute magnitude (HV ) (Rus-
sell, 1916; Pravec and Harris, 2007):
√
pV =
1329 km 10−0.2HV
Deff [km]
3
(4)
The geometric albedo is then converted to the bolometric Bond albedo using the definition of the phase
integral, q:
(5)
in which G is the slope parameter (Bowell et al., 1989) and the approximation A ≈ AV is made in equa-
tion (1).
q ≡ AV /pV = 0.290 + 0.684 × GV
2.3. Thermal Inertia and Surface Roughness
√
The characteristic ability of a material to resist temperature changes when subject to a change in en-
ergy balance is quantified by its thermal inertia (Γ =
kρc). Atmosphereless surfaces with low thermal
inertia conduct little thermal energy into the subsurface, resulting in dayside temperatures that are close to
instantaneous equilibrium with the insolation and extremely high diurnal temperature differences. Surfaces
having large thermal inertia store and/or conduct thermal energy in the subsurface during the day so that
significant energy is re-radiated during the nighttime hours, which results in a comparatively smaller diur-
nal temperature change. This influence that thermal inertia has on the surface temperature distribution
manifests in the observed SED. Thus photometry at two wavelengths (e.g. a measurement of the color tem-
perature) can provide a better measure of thermal inertia compared to that of a single wavelength (Mueller,
2007). Figure 1(a) shows the normalized SEDs of surfaces (at opposition) having different thermal inertia,
roughness, and shape. Surfaces with higher roughness and low thermal inertia exhibit flux enhancement at
small wavelengths near opposition, lowering the wavelength location of the peak flux. Data collected which
have large wavelength separation that span the blackbody peak are most useful, since they are sensitive to
relatively warmer and cooler portions of the surface - in other words the overall temperature distribution.
Delbo' and Tanga (2009) estimated thermal inertias for 10 main-belt asteroids using multi-wavelength IRAS
(Infrared Astronomical Satellite) observations, and Hanus et al. (2015, 2018) collectively present thermal
inertia estimates for 131 objects using WISE (Wide-Field infrared Survey Explorer) data. Harris and Drube
(2016) present population trends using over a hundred thermal inertias derived from the NEATM η values
of asteroid observed with WISE.
Multiple observations at a single wavelength but at various solar phase angles - a thermal phase curve -
have also proven to be useful methods to estimate thermal inertia (e.g. Spencer, 1990). Figure 1(b) shows
examples of thermal phase curves for 3 different objects, each possessing 5 different thermal inertia values.
Muller et al. (2011) and Muller et al. (2017) demonstrated that observations of (162173) 1993 JU3, Ryugu,
taken on one side of opposition but widely spaced in solar phase angle (30◦) can constrain thermal inertia
as they effectively had two points along a thermal phase curve. As seen in figure 1(b), this approach can be
optimized when the thermal phase curve spans across both sides of opposition. Thus, observing at pre- and
post-opposition virtually guarantees that thermal emission information from the warmer afternoon (α > 0)
and cooler morning sides is gathered (Muller et al., 2014).
Surfaces with large degrees of roughness exhibit warmer dayside temperatures, due to more of the surface
area pointed towards the sun and from the effects of multiple scattering of reflected and emitted light. The
term "beaming effect" is used to describe enhanced thermal flux return in the direction of the sun at low
phase angles. As pointed out by Rozitis (2017), the flux enhancement near opposition is highly sensitive to
surface roughness. They also demonstrated that telescopic observations at a near pole-on illumination and
viewing geometry can be used to effectively constrain the degree of roughness, specifically when α < 40◦ and
the sub-solar latitude is greater than 60◦ (figure 1(b & c)). Figure 1(b) shows thermal phase curves of objects
with smooth and rough surfaces of varying thermal inertia. Figure 1(c) shows the thermal flux emitted as a
function of sub-solar latitude and recreates the findings of Rozitis (2017). In general, the surface roughness
of airless bodies are more easily estimated near opposition or, better yet, with disk-resolved observations
that offer a greater range of viewing geometries. The Rozitis (2017) study shows that the uncertainty in
thermal inertia is slightly larger for an object observed at a large phase angle, as a consequence of the
difficulty in estimating surface roughness.
4
Figure 1: Comparison of thermal flux emitted from an object varying it's thermophysical properties and shape, as a computed
from the TPM described in section 3. Panel (a) shows blackbody curves, normalized at 12 µm, thermal phase curves are shown
in (b), and panel (c) shows the flux as a function of the sub-solar/observer latitude. The modeled object has Deff = 1 km,
Teq = 300 K, Prot = 10 hr, located 1 AU from the observer. Within all frames, black curves are for a smooth sphere, orange
curves are for a rough (¯θ = 29◦) sphere, and green curves are for a prolate ellipsoid with a/b = 1.75. Blue curves show the
amplitude of the ellipsoid's thermal lightcurve. As indicated in the key, the solid, dotted, and dashed curves in all frames
distinguish different values of thermal inertia. We note here that pre-opposition is defined as α > 0, in which the afternoon
side of a prograde rotator is viewed.
2.4. Shape and Spin Direction
Disk-integrated flux is also directly affected by the shape and spin vector of an object ( Durech et al., 2017).
If thermal observations sample the entire rotation period, a thermal light curve is useful to constraining these
parameters. In particular, the amplitude of the thermal lightcurve is largely affected by the elongation and
orientation of the spin vector. In principle, constraints can be placed on the spin vector - or, at least, spin
direction - of objects since the temperature distribution is affected by the sub-solar latitude, and thus the
spin vector (Muller et al., 2011, 2012, 2014, 2017). Figure 1(c) shows the variation of the flux for an ellipsoid
at different viewing geometries. Gathering multiple thermal lightcurves can offer amplitude measurements at
different viewing geometries, which significantly improves determination of the global shape. Both Morrison
(1977) and Hansen (1977a) correctly determine the spin direction by observing the change in diameter
estimates for data acquired before and after opposition. The diameter estimate of (1) Ceres, a prograde
rotator, before opposition was 5% larger than the diameter estimates from post-opposition observations.
Muller et al. (2014) explicitly mentions that observations at either side of opposition are useful indicators
of the spin direction. As shown in figure 1(a), this effect is due to the flux excess emitted from the hotter
afternoon side of a prograde rotator as it is would be observed before opposition (e.g. Lagerros, 1996).
5
c 2.5. Motivation for this Work
The text and figure above demonstrate how multi-wavelength thermal lightcurve observations, which
span across an object's blackbody peak region, and at both pre- and post-opposition (with ∆α > 40◦), con-
tain information directly dependent on an object's physical properties. Thermal inertia, surface roughness,
and spin direction can all be constrained from measurements of an object's thermal phase curve, particularly
when observations widely vary in solar phase angle. Additionally, thermal lightcurve amplitude measure-
ments at more than one viewing geometry are a unique indicator of the elongation of a rotating object. The
work described in the rest of this paper demonstrates and quantifies the effectiveness of using an ellipsoidal
TPM to model the thermophysical properties of any given asteroid, given the dataset described above.
3. Thermophysical Model Description
The TPM approach described here involves calculating surface temperatures for a spherical and various
prolate ellipsoids in order to model and fit pre- and post-opposition multi-wavelength thermal observations.
Both a smooth and rough surface TPM were developed for use in the fitting routine.
3.1. Smooth TPM
In development of the smooth TPM we find it particularly useful to parameterize the depth variable in
equation (3) as x(cid:48) = x/ls (Spencer et al., 1989), where ls is the thermal skin depth, the length scale at which
the amplitude of the diurnal temperature variation changes by a factor of e ≈ 2.718:
ls =
k
ρc
Prot
2π
,
(6)
where Prot is the rotation period of the body. This parameterization transforms the temperature gradient
term in equation (2) as follows:
,
(7)
In order to further reduce the number of independent input variables, we also parameterize the temperature
and time as T (cid:48) = T /Teq and t(cid:48) = 2πt/Prot Θ. The thermal parameter, Θ2 is given by:
(cid:115)
(cid:114) 2π
(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)surf
k
dT
dx(cid:48)
⇒ Γ
dT
dx(cid:48)
Prot
(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)surf
(cid:114) 2π
Γ
Θ =
εBσT 3
eq
Prot
.
(8)
Spencer et al. (1989) introduced this dimensionless parameter, which accounts for factors that affect the
diurnal temperature variation. This parameter was realized by comparing the diurnal rotation of a body to
the timescale in which thermal energy is stored and then re-radiated, per unit surface area (Spencer et al.,
1989).
Ignoring the effects of multiple-scattering and self-heating, this parameterization scheme changes
equation (2) to
(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)surf
dT (cid:48)
dx(cid:48)
cos(i) + Θ
− T (cid:48)4
surf = 0,
and equation (3) to
∂T (cid:48)(x(cid:48), t(cid:48))
∂t(cid:48)
= Θ
∂2T (cid:48)(x(cid:48), t(cid:48))
∂x(cid:48)2
.
Surface temperatures are calculated across the surface of a sphere by solving equation (10), given the
upper boundary condition equation (9). Since the amplitude of diurnal temperature changes decreases
2For reference, objects with Θ = 0 exhibit surface temperatures in equilibrium with the insolation and objects with Θ > 100
have nearly isothermal surface temperatures at each latitude.
6
(9)
(10)
exponentially, the heat flux approaches zero, and the lower boundary becomes:
(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)x(cid:48)→∞
dT (cid:48)
dx(cid:48)
= 0.
(11)
Using the parameterized depth, time, and temperature, the number of input variables in this model is
effectively reduced to two (the thermal parameter and sub-solar latitude). A finite-difference approach is
used to numerically implement equation (10), as detailed in Appendix A. This spherical, smooth-surface
TPM consisted of 13 latitude bins and was run for 46 values of sub-solar latitude (0◦ to 90◦ in 2◦ increments)
and 116 values of the thermal parameter (spaced equally in logarithmic space, from 0 to 450) in order to
generate the surface temperature look-up tables of T (cid:48).
3.2. Rough TPM
Our rough surface cratered TPM is similar to that originally presented by Hansen (1977b) which was im-
proved upon by both Spencer (1990) and Emery et al. (1998) to include heat conduction, multiple scattering
of insolation, and re-absorption of thermal radiation within spherical craters. Following the procedure of
Emery et al. (1998), craters are constructed with m = 40 planar elements contained within k = 4 rings that
are radially symmetric about the crater center. The kth ring outward contains 4k elements, all of which are
forced to have the same surface area (see Figures 1 & 2 in Emery et al., 1998, for crater depiction). As was
mentioned by Spencer (1990), craters with more than 4 rings significantly increase the overall computational
time and do not enhance the model resolution over the 4-ringed crater in most cases. The overall geometry of
these craters is characterized by the half-opening angle, γ, as measured from the center-line of the crater to
the edge (e.g. a hemispherical crater has γ = 90◦). The overall degree of surface roughness is characterized
by the mean surface slope (¯θ; Hapke, 1984), which is only a function of γ and the fraction of area covered
by craters, fR (Lagerros, 1996):
tan ¯θ =
2fR
π
sin(γ) − ln[1 + sin(γ)] + ln cos(γ)
cos(γ) − 1
(12)
As shown in Emery et al. (1998), the fraction of energy transferred to one crater element from another is
(conveniently) equal among all elements. The scattered solar and re-absorbed thermal radiation received by
the ith crater facet from the jth facet are
m(cid:88)
i(cid:54)=j
m(cid:88)
i(cid:54)=j
i(cid:54)=j
Esolar
i,scat =
S(cid:12)(1 − A)
R2
AU
A
1 − A γ
π
1 − cos(γ)
2m
cos(ij)
and
Etherm
i,abs =
1 − cos(γ)
2m
(1 − Ath)
εBσT 4
j ,
(13)
(14)
respectively. The energy balance at the surface (equation (2)), in our parameterized time, temperature, and
depth environment, becomes:
1 − cos(γ)
(cid:32)
(cid:33)
A
m(cid:88)
cos(ij) + (1 − Ath)
T (cid:48)4
j
+ Θ
− T (cid:48)4
surf = 0.
(15)
cos(i)(1 − s) +
(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)surf
dT (cid:48)
dx(cid:48)
m(cid:88)
i(cid:54)=j
2m
1 − A γ
π
Since planetary surfaces are highly absorbing at infrared wavelengths, the Bond albedo at thermal-infrared
wavelengths (Ath) is assumed to be zero. Thus, only singly-scattered re-aborption of thermal emission within
the crater is considered, in contrast to multiple scattering and re-absorption of the insolation. Temperature
lookup tables are generated for craters of the same values of sub-solar latitude and thermal parameter as
the smooth surface TPM runs. This was done for three sets of craters of varying opening angle in order
to simulate changes in roughness. Unlike the parameterized version of the smooth surface energy balance
7
equation, A is included as an independent input parameter, requiring us to explicitly account for changes in
this parameter. Fortunately, it only appears in the solar scattering term, which is not a major contributor
to the total energy budget. Our spherical, rough-surface TPM consists of 13 different latitude bins and
was run for 3 values of γ = {45◦, 68◦, 90◦}, 46 values of sub-solar latitude (0◦ to 90◦ in 2◦ increments),
116 values of the thermal parameter (spread out in logarithmic space, from 0 to 450), and 7 values of
Agrid = {0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 1}3 to construct this large set of T (cid:48) lookup tables.
3.3. Non-spherical Shapes
Shape model facet temperatures are independent of one another in our TPM because global self-heating
does not occur on the spherical and ellipsoidal shapes considered here. Since the insolation upon a facet is
only dependent on the orientation of the surface normal to the sun, it is possible to map, or transform, surface
temperatures from one shape to another. We exploit this fact in order to map the surface temperatures from
a spherical body to convex DAMIT shape models and ellipsoids. We make use of two kinds of coordinate
systems, which are depicted in figure 2. The body-centric (θ, φ) coordinate system defines the latitude and
longitude of a facet relative to the center of the shape model. Shape model facets are often described using
sets of vectors, r, given in body-centric coordinates. Alternatively, (ϑ, ϕ) describes a coordinate system that
describes the tilt of a facet relative to the local surface, which we call the surface-normal coordinates. Both
ϑ and ϕ are calculated using the surface normal vector n shown in figure 2 (for a sphere, the body-centric
and facet-normal coordinates are equivalent). For any given facet, on any shape model, with ϑ and ϕ,
the temperatures can be equated to a facet on a sphere that has the same surface-normal coordinates. In
Appendix B we derive closed-form analytic expressions to map temperatures from a sphere to the effective
coordinates of a triaxial (a ≥ b ≥ c) ellipsoid.
Figure 2: The coordinate systems used for a hypothetical planar facet, shown in grey. In blue: body-centric longitude and
latitude, θ and φ, repsectively. In red: the surface-normal longitude and latitude, ϑ and ϕ, respectively.
3.4. Flux Calculation
Thermal flux is calculated by a summation of the individual flux contributions from smooth surface and
crater elements visible to the observer (i.e. equation (18)). To calculate the flux of an object not having
3We omit values of A between 0.5 and 1 since asteroid bond albedos are rarely this large.
8
θϑφφXYZnr exact Θ or sub-solar latitude values included in our lookup temperature tables, we calculate the fluxes for
the closest grid points and perform a linear interpolation to compute the fluxes for the desired parameters.
Instead of doing the same for A, we calculate the flux for a value from Agrid and then multiply by an
adjustment factor, Λ. This approach saves time and computational cost by not computing an interpolation
across three variables (or dimensions). A similar approach was described by Wolters et al. (2011), in which
they calculated fluxes for a perfectly absorbing surface and employed a correction factor based on the desired
A. Here, Λ was tested empirically and adjusts the model flux based on the blackbody Teq curves of the
desired A and the closest value of Agrid.
(cid:34)
(cid:18) B(λ, Teq(Agrid))
(cid:19)2/3(cid:35)
B(λ, Teq(A))
Λ(A, Agrid) =
1
2
1 +
.
(16)
The χ2 goodness-of-fit statistic is evaluated using the modeled flux points, Fm(λ), the observed flux mea-
surements, Fo(λ), with the associated 1-σ uncertainty, σo, and in general:
(cid:88) (Fm(λ) − Fo(λ))2
σ2
o
χ2 =
.
(17)
We note here that instead of individual flux measurements, the modeled and observed fluxes used in equa-
tion (17) represent only the extracted mean and peak-to-trough range of thermal lightcurve fluxes, and their
uncertainties as calculated via error propagation. As part of the data-fitting routine, the free-parameters of
the model are varied in order to minimize the goodness-of-fit as described in the following subsection.
A weighted-sum of fluxes to simulate a surface that is comprised of smooth and rough surface patches:
{(1 − fR)Bsmooth(λ, T (θ, φ)) + fR(1 − v)ΛBrough(λ, T (θ, φ, i))} cos(e)dA.
(18)
(cid:90)
(cid:90)
S
F (λ) =
ελ
∆2
AU
in which ∆AU is the observer-centric distance in AU. The visibility factor, v, is analogous to the shadowing
factor; v = 1 if a facet is hidden from view, otherwise v = 0. Each point on the surface is treated as a
blackbody emitter with wavelength-dependent emissivity, ελ and temperature, T = TeqT (cid:48):
B(λ, T ) =
2hc2
λ5
1
exp(hc/λkbT ) − 1
.
(19)
3.5. Data-Fitting Routine
At each epoch, both the mean flux and peak-to-trough range of the thermal light curve are extracted
and used in the model fitting procedure. As alluded to in section 2, these two parameters contain diagnos-
tic information about the object's shape, spin direction, and thermophysical properties and can be easily
extracted from non-dense thermal lightcurve data. In principle, it is just as feasible to fit models to each
independent flux point that contributes to an object's infrared lightcurve. Doing so could offer insight
into the shape, as departures from a sinusoidal lightcurve can indicate relative topographic lows or highs.
However, such an approach works best in cases in which the thermal lightcurve is densely sampled, which
is often not the case in untargeted astronomical surveys such as IRAS, Akari, and WISE. In this work we
focus on estimating only the elongation of a body by incorporating the photometric range (peak-to-trough)
of the thermal lightcurve. TPM fitting to sparse thermal lightcurves is prone to systematic parameter bias
from oversampling and/or heteroscedastic uncertainties across many rotational phases, which can unevenly
emphasize certain rotational phases over others, thus skewing the best-fit parameters. An example of this
would be a scenario in which peaks of the modeled lightcurce were fit better with the observed lightcurve
minima, thus resulting in an overall lower best-fit modeled fluxes. However, the capacity and capability
of incorporating thermal lightcurve data into the shape model inversion process, when it is combined with
visible lightcurve data, should be explored further ( Durech et al., 2014, 2015).
9
l
, βeclip
In our data fitting approach, the shape, spin vector (λeclip
), roughness, and thermal inertia are
left as free parameters that we select from a pre-defined sample space, and we search for the best-fit Deff .
A sphere and ellipsoids with b/c=1 (i.e. prolate) with a/b axis ratios of 1.25, 1.75, 2.5, and 3.5 are used.
For each of these shapes, we sample through 25 predefined thermal inertia values, 3 default roughness (¯θ)
values, and 235 spin vectors. Following (table 1 in Delbo' and Tanga, 2009), each value of γ is paired with
a corresponding fR = {0.5, 0.8, 1.0} value in order to produce default mean surface slopes of ¯θ = {10◦, 29◦,
and 58◦}. The thermal inertia points are evenly spread in log space from 0 to 3000 Jm−2K−1s−1/2, and the
spin vectors are spread evenly throughout the celestial sphere. For each shape/spin vector/Γ combination
we use a routine to find the Deff value which minimizes χ2.
l
The grid of spin vectors are formed by constructing a Fibonacci lattice in spherical coordinates (Swinbank
and Purser, 2006). Here, a Fermat spiral is traced along the surface of the celestial sphere, using the golden
ratio (Φ ≈ 1.618) to determine the turn angle between consecutive points along the spiral. The result is
a set of points with near-perfect homogeneous areal coverage across the celestial sphere. This Fibonacci
lattice constructed here uses N = 235 points with the lth point (i ∈ [0, N − 1]) having an ecliptic latitude
and longitude of
(cid:18) 2l − N + 1
(cid:19)
N − 1
βeclip
l
= arcsin
(20)
(21)
and
λeclip
l
= 2πlΦ−1 mod 2π,
respectively. The mean flux value, and the peak-to-trough range, at each wavelength and at each epoch are
taken as input to equation (17). The Van Wijngaarden-Dekker-Brent minimization algorithm, commonly
known as Brent's Method (Brent, 1973), combined with the golden section search routine (§10.2 Press et al.,
2007), is used since it does not require any derivatives of the χ2 function to be known. The algorithm uses
three values of χ2 evaluated at different input diameters to uniquely define a parabola. The algorithm used
the minima of these parabolas to iteratively converge on the Deff /A combination that corresponds to the
global minimum of χ2 value to within 0.01%.
The values of Deff and A are linked through equation (4) and equation (5) for a smooth surface, but
the effect of multiple scattering alters the energy balance, and thus effective albedo (Mueller, 2007)4, for a
cratered surface:
Acrater (γ) = A
.
(22)
1 − sin2(γ/2)
1 − A sin2(γ/2)
An object having an areal mixture of both smooth and rough topography has an effective bond albedo,
Aeff , which is a weighted average of the albedo of a smooth surface and the bond albedo of a crater Acrater
(Wolters et al., 2011):
Aeff (fR, γ) = (1 − fR)A + fRAcrater .
(23)
√
√
To place confidence limits on each of the fitted parameters, we use the χ2 values calculated during
the fitting procedure. In general, the χ2 distribution depends on ν degrees of freedom (3 in the present
work), which is equal to the number of data points (constraints; 8 in this work, as described in section 4.1)
minus the number of input (free; 5 in this work) parameters. Since the χ2 distribution has an expectation
value of ν and a standard deviation of
min = ν, and those with
χ2 < (ν +
2ν) represent 1-σ confidence estimates5. However, because of the TPM assumptions (e.g. no
global self-heating, homogeneous thermophysical properties) it is often possible for the TPM to not perfectly
agree with the data, in which case χ2
2ν to place 1-σ confidence
min < ν +
limits. This modification effectively scales the cutoff bounds by a factor of χ2
min , instead of adopting the
traditional approach of using a constant χ2 distance cutoff. This scaling of the χ2 cutoff bounds is a more
conservative approach in quoting parameter uncertainties, as it includes the systematic uncertainties that
min in the reported parameter uncertainties. Using the reduced χ2 statistic ( χ2 = χ2/ν),
lead to the larger χ2
2ν, the best-fit solutions cluster around χ2
min > ν. In this case, we use χ2/χ2
√
4The crater opening angle used in Mueller (2007) is twice that used here.
5Consequently, χ2 < (ν + 2
2ν) and χ2 < (ν + 3
√
√
2ν) give the respective 2- and 3-σ confidence limits.
10
we can express the solutions within a 1-σ range as χ2 < χ2
min (1 +
√
2ν/ν).
In section 5, we report TPM results for all of the objects that we analyzed, even those for which a
min (indicating a poor fit to the data), which are considered unreliable and should only be used with
high χ2
caution.
4. Method Testing and Validation
Section 2 describes how pre- and post-opposition multi-wavelength thermal observations are able to simul-
taneously constrain multiple thermophysical (albedo, thermal inertia, and surface roughness) and physical
(diameter, shape and spin direction) properties of an object.
In this section we present results from a
proof-of-concept test of the ability to constrain the above parameters with WISE pre- and post-opposition
observations. In performing this test, we generate an artificial flux dataset from shape models from DAMIT
(Database of Asteroid Models from Inversion Techniques; Durech, 2010) as a benchmark for testing the
accuracy and precision of our TPM approach. Specifically, we search for and quantify any biases that may
exist among each fit parameter. We also include a comparison to the uncertainty estimates to typical values
found in previous works.
4.1. Synthetic Flux Dataset
Table 1 lists the objects, DAMIT shape models used, the associated rotation periods and the effective di-
ameter, as computed beforehand via a NEATM fit to the real WISE observations. The observing geometries
used in the synthetic model runs are the same as the WISE observations listed in table 3. We calculate the
artificial thermal emission for WISE photometric filters W3 and W4 (12 & 24 µm) for a full rotation of the
shape. From these infrared lightcurves, we extract the mean and peak-to-trough flux range for each filter
as input into our fitting routine (equation (17)). Since we now have these 2 quantities, observed twice for
two wavelengths, there are 8 data points to constrain 5 free parameters: diameter, thermal inertia, surface
roughness, shape elongation, and sense of spin. Fluxes for each shape model are calculated using the TPM
described here by using the actual WISE observing circumstances detailed in table 3. If an object has two
shape models available - a result of ambiguous solutions of the lightcurve inversion algorithm - then both
were included in the analysis.
Table 1: Shape Models & Physical Properties for Synthetic Dataset
Object
Shape Model
a/bsynth
(167) Urda
(183) Istria
(208) Lacrimosa
(413) Edburga
(509) Iolanda
(771) Libera
(857) Glasenappia
(984) Gretia
(1036) Ganymed
M171
M172
M669
M182
M183
M354
M521
M522
M250
M609
M610
M256
M261
1.31
1.30
1.39
1.22
1.23
1.37
1.41
1.32
1.50
2.30
2.32
1.57
1.05
Prot (hr) Dsynth
eff
(km)
HV
GV
13.06133
43.00
9.131
0.283
11.76897
35.48
9.481
0.221
14.0769
44.35
9.076
0.232
15.77149
35.69
9.925
0.296
12.29088
60.07
8.476
0.382
5.890423
29.52
10.28
0.323
8.20756
15.63
11.29
0.246
5.778025
10.313
35.76
37.42
9.526
0.379
9.236
0.311
Spin Vector
−69◦, 107◦
−68◦, 249◦
20◦, 8◦
−75◦, 20◦
−68◦, 176◦
−45◦, 202◦
24◦, 90◦
54◦, 248◦
−78◦, 64◦
34◦, 38◦
48◦, 227◦
52◦, 245◦
−78◦, 190◦
11
Table 1 -- continued
Object
Shape Model
a/bsynth
(1140) Crimea
(1188) Gothlandia
(1291) Phryne
(1432) Ethiopia
(1495) Helsinki
(1568) Aisleen
(1607) Mavis
(1980) Tezcatlipoca
(2156) Kate
(4611) Vulkaneifel
(5625) 1991 AO2
(6159) 1991 YH
M403
M404
M479
M409
M410
M657
M658
M656
M422
M477
M478
M274
M438
M704
M705
M682
M683
M757
M758
1.76
1.61
1.71
2.03
2.30
1.27
1.32
1.74
2.30
1.56
1.93
1.72
2.15
1.68
1.64
3.48
3.18
1.55
1.65
Spin Vector
−73◦, 12◦
−22◦, 175◦
−84◦, 334◦
35◦, 106◦
59◦, 277◦
54◦, 225◦
44◦, 41◦
−39◦, 355◦
−68◦, 109◦
70◦, 222◦
59◦, 0◦
−69◦, 324◦
74◦, 49◦
−50◦, 197◦
−86◦, 5◦
−78◦, 97◦
−52◦, 265◦
67◦, 62◦
67◦, 266◦
Prot (hr) Dsynth
eff
(km)
HV
GV
9.78693
31.77
9.621
0.207
3.491820
13.29
11.52
0.254
5.584137
27.87
10.29
0.251
9.84425
7.510
12.02
0.282
5.33131
6.67597
13.54
13.60
11.41
0.359
11.49
0.131
6.14775
15.10
11.32
0.256
7.25226
5.622153
5.333
8.678
13.57
0.186
4.339
0.186
3.756356
12.38
11.87
0.268
6.67412
7 14.25
12.83
0.165
10.65893
5.148
13.38
0.175
4.2. Model Validation Results
The best-fit TPM parameter results for the synthetic dataset are detailed below and depicted in figure 3.
Overall, using ellipsoid shapes results in more accurate and precise estimates for diameter, thermal inertia,
and shape.
Diameter Constraints. Figure 3 includes diameter uncertainties, shown by grey bars, based off of the noise
of WISE data. The uncertainty overlap with the expected diameter values indicates that the uncertainty
in the data is equal to or larger than the uncertainty introduced by model assumptions. The assumption
of a spherical shape results in overestimation of diameter of up to 20%, as shown in figure 3(a). The TPM
performs better when using ellipsoid shapes; at most, diameters are overestimated by 10%. These offsets
are particularly pronounced for highly elongated objects with high Θ values and when observed at large
sub-solar latitude values. In these cases, the average observed cross-sectional area is particularly large and
surface temperatures are, on average, warmer (figure 1(c)), since a larger fraction of the surface experiences
perpetual daylight. Diameter uncertainties when using ellipsoid shapes are consistent with the ±10% value
seen in other thermophysical modeling papers, yet seem to imply a drop in accuracy from the NEATM
(Harris, 2005). However, care must be taken when comparing the performance results presented here, which
are based on synthetic data generated from shape models with various spin vectors, and those presented by
Harris (2005), which uses an idealized synthetic dataset generated from spherical shapes with no obliquity.
The work of Wright (2007), who included rough spheres in their performance test of NEATM, shows diameter
accuracy of the NEATM to be on par with TPM works, such as this one.
12
Figure 3: The best-fit diameter vs. model diameter for spherical (a) and ellipsoidal (b) TPM shape. Panels (c) and (d) show
the same for Θ. The red dashed and dotted lines show the best fit to the data and the corresponding 95% confidence interval.
Blue, dash-dotted lines show the 68% prediction interval. The best-fit thermal parameter vs. model thermal parameter. Panel
(e) shows the fractional difference in DAMIT area-equivalent a/b to the best fit ellipsoid, expressed as a percentage. Lastly,
the percentage of TPM solutions that correctly identifiy the spin direction is given in panel (f).
Thermal Inertia/Parameter Constraints. We transform thermal inertia estimates into thermal parameter
space equation (8); since the rotation periods of synthetic objects affect the temperature distribution and
13
abcdef must be accounted for. Panels (c) and (d) in figure 3 show the estimated Θ values for the spherical and
best-fit ellipsoidal shape, respectively, against the synthetic values. When a sphere is used for a TPM,
thermal inertia is overestimated at low values and underestimates at large Θ values. At either extreme of
Θ, this offset is systematically different by a factor of ∼4. Ellipsoidal shapes do a much better job matching
the input Θ, with systematic offsets of less than 25% (red dashed line in figure 3(d)). We investigate this
discrepancy further in section 4.3 and note here that the estimated uncertainties (grey bars), calculated
from WISE signal-to-noise ratios for each object, are far larger than the systematic offset, indicating that
the assumptions in our TPM fitting do not contribute much to the overall uncertainty in thermal inertia
and the χ2-based errors values reasonably reflects the overall precision in our TPM.
Shape Constraints. To assess how well our method is able to constrain the shape (elongation) of an object,
we compare the best-fit ellipsoid a/b to that of the area-equivalent a/b ratio of the DAMIT shape model.
Since we use a sparse grid of possible a/b values, placing meaningful confidence bars based on χ2 values is not
practical. Instead, we plot the frequency distribution of %a/b (= a/bellip
- 1) difference in figure 3. Fitting
a/bDAMIT
a Gaussian function (16%, with standard deviation of 18%) to the distribution shows that the assumptions
within the model, most likely the use of a prolate ellipsoid (a/c = 1), results in a slight overestimation of
the a/b axis. The standard deviation of this distribution is reflective not of the uncertainty in the mean
offset in the shape accuracy, but reflective of the inherent model uncertainties that arise from assuming an
ellipsoid shape. Accounting for this discrepancy, we shift the TPM best-fit shape result downward by 16%
and assign an uncertainty of 18%.
Spin Constraints. We also investigated the ability to constrain the spin direction of an object (i.e. retrograde
or prograde rotation). In total, the ellipsoid TPM correctly identified the spin direction 58.3 ± 6.5% of the
time compared to 67.1± 5.7% for the spherical TPM. In section 2.4 we pointed out that thermal inertia is a
significant factor when constraining spin direction. Thus, we break down our results into the thermal inertia
bins assigned for the artificial dataset. Figure 3(f) shows the percentage of best-fit solutions, broken down
by sphere/ellipsoid shape assumption, in which spin direction was correctly identified for a given thermal
inertia.
It is clear that intermediate values of thermal inertia provide more reliable constraints on the
spin direction, which can be explained by the increased asymmetry of thermal phase curves at intermediate
values of thermal inertia. As more extreme (low and high) values of thermal inertia result in more symmetric
thermal phase curves, which make it difficult to distinguish morning and afternoon hemispheres, and thus
spin direction (figure 1(a)).
Table 2: Multiple Linear Regression Results
%∆Deff
%∆Θ
coefficient
p-value
coefficient
p-value
Dsynth
eff
log10(Θsynth)
s-s lat.synth
s-o lat.synth
a/bsynth
intercept
-0.0009 ± 0.0004
-0.0037 ± 0.0067
--
0.0024 ± 0.0005
0.0085 ± 0.0119
-0.0264 ± 0.0319
0.02
0.59
--
0.0012 ± 0.0017
0.48
-0.1390 ± 0.0292 < 0.01
-0.0036 ± 0.0024
0.12
< 0.01
--
0.48
0.41
0.0573 ± 0.0507
-0.0621 ± 0.1357
--
0.26
0.65
14
4.3. Parameter Bias Analysis
We performed a linear multiple regression analysis on the percent diameter and Θ difference (%∆Deff and
%∆Θeff , between the synthetic and TPM estimates) to distinguish, if any, factors which bias the estimates.
The predictor variables chosen were log10(Θ), the sub-solar latitude (s-s lat.) or sub-observer latitude (s-o
lat.), and the elongation of the shape model (a/bsynth), because they are the most likely to affect the response
variable (section 2). The regression models the response variable - the percent difference in diameter or Θ
- as being linearly dependent on the sum of any number of independent predictor variables - in this case 4.
For each predictor, the regression model computes a slope coefficient which represents the change in that
variable when all others are held constant. An intercept term, quantifying the value of the response when
all predictors are zero, is also computed. Table 2 shows the slope coefficients, intercepts, along with the
associated p-values; indicating the statistical significance of each predictor variable in the multiple regression
model. We use p < 0.05, representing a 95% confidence level, to identify predictor variables that affect the
response variable (p-values that are larger than this cutoff indicate that the predictor variable has little to
no statistically relevant effect on the response variable).
The diameters calculated from our approach are overestimated when observations occur at high sub-
observer latitudes (p < 0.01) and for small diameters (p = 0.02) as marked in grey in table 2. From the
multiple regression results performed on Θ, the only predictor that explains the variance in response variable
is Θsynth, marked in table 2 with grey. The negative sign represents an overestimation for small Θ and/or
underestimation at large Θ. A re-examination of panel (d) in figure 3 shows that this offset is due to points
with Θ > 6. For lower values of Θ, the best-fit line is likely skewed upward due to the underestimation at
the larger end. We thus, employ a formulation to correct objects for which Θ > 6:
Θcorr = 10(
b
1+m )Θ(
1
1+m ).
(24)
To determine correction factor, we fit a line to objects with Θ > 4 (shown by the purple-dotted line in
figure 4) and compute m = −0.136 and b = 0.026. This fit provides a means of removing the systematic
underestimation in thermal parameter, and by proxy, thermal inertia. The bias seen in panel (d) of figure 3
vanishes, as shown by the red best-line in figure 4 re-computed after using equation (24) to adjust the
Θsynth > 6 values. Thermal parameters this large are more likely to be found for objects with unusually
high thermal inertia and/or among slow rotators - or for icy bodies low surface temperatures in the outer
solar system (e.g. table 1 in Spencer et al., 1989).
15
Figure 4: Percent difference between synthetic and best-fit Θ as a function of the synthetic (known) value. For Θ > 6, we
derive a formula (equation (24)) to adjust the underestimation (open purple circles) such that the corrected values (grey dots)
are symmetric about zero percent difference, represented by the black horizontal line. The red best-fit line to the black and
grey dots has a slope of nearly zero and shows no evidence for a bias at either Θ extreme.
4.4. Other Possible Sources of Bias
Upon closer inspection of the multiple regression results we see that the skew at small sizes is due to
particular objects being observed at high latitudes rather than by the intrinsic diameter of the object.
The effect that the viewing geometry has on the size estimation can be explained by the fact that the
thermal lightcurve-averaged flux does not properly represent the effective diameter. For the extreme case of
observations taken from a "pole-on" geometry, the thermal flux represents the largest feasible cross-sectional
area, which would result in the overestimation of diameters, regardless of the shape used in the TPM.
In some of the largest publications of independently-derived thermal inertias (Delbo' and Tanga, 2009;
Hanus et al., 2015, 2018), convex shape models were used in the TPM approach. One critique of using
convex shape models is that actual asteroids can potentially harbor shape concavities, which raises potential
concern as to whether or not large deviations from a spherical shape will bias the temperature distribution
in any significant way (Rozitis and Green, 2013). Radar observations of the NEA (341843) 2008 EV5 showed
a large concavitiy, and thermal observations were analyzed in detail by Al´ı-Lagoa et al. (2013). They found
no evidence that the concavity influenced the results, as its effects on the thermal emission (i.e. shadowing
and global self-heating) was likely below the signal-to-noise of the observations. Using a larger set of shape
models with concavities Rozitis and Green (2013) demonstrated that the effects of global self-heating and
shadowing have negligible effects on the temperature distribution compared to that of thermal inertia and
surface roughness, which is consistent with the findings of Lagerros (1997) who investigated the effect using
objects random Gaussian shapes. All of these studies justify the use of convex, prolate ellipsoid studies in
our TPM approach.
Although not the case here, thermal inertia bias could arise if the size is fixed during the fitting procedure.
For example, diameters that are estimated from radar observations can suffer from an overestimated z-axis
if the object is observed at near-equatorial view, yielding a higher thermal inertia (Rozitis and Green, 2014).
Some studies have investigated how changes in shape and spin vector can affect the value of thermal inertia.
Using both a spherical and radar shape model for the asteroid (101955) Bennu, Emery et al. (2014) found
that the radar shape model gave a lower thermal inertia result compared to a spherical shape with the
same spin vector. The lower thermal inertia is explained by the oblateness of Bennu, as surface facets are
systematically tilted away from the sun-direction, cooling the surface temperatures relative to that of a
sphere and requiring a lower model thermal inertia to compensate. As briefly mentioned before, our use
16
of prolate ellipsoids may likely be the cause of overestimation of the elongation of objects. For example:
if we were to make b/c = 1.1, the average orientation of the shape facets would veer away from the sun
and effectively lower the modeled surface temperatures. By lengthening the b/c axis, there is less need to
lengthen the a/b axis in order to match the surface temperature.
It is becoming increasingly common for thermal infrared observations to be used to refine the detailed
shape models created from the delay-Doppler radar and/or the visible lightcurve inversion techniques Durech
et al. (2017). Shape models from these methodologies can sometimes yield incorrect z-axis if the object is
observed nearly equator-on (Rozitis et al., 2013; Rozitis and Green, 2014). In short, thermal data constrains
the effective diameter and by extension the z-axis dimension if the x- & y-axis dimensions were known to
great accuracy from the observations. Additionally, Hanus et al. (2015) utilized thermal infrared data to
refine convex shape models derived from lightcurve inversion. They varied a convex shape model within
the uncertainty of the photometric errors to generate a set of shapes to then be used to generate thermal
fluxes from a TPM which were then fit to WISE observations. Although not much work has been done
to derive new shapes from only disk-integrated thermal emission data, approaches that combine thermal
observations with optical lightcurves ( Durech et al., 2012, 2014) and other telescopic observations (e.g.
stellar occultations, optical interferometry and delay-Doppler radar; Durech et al., 2015, 2017) have been
employed in order to refine pre-existing shape models. Generally, the refined shape models appear smoother
( Durech et al., 2012; Hanus et al., 2015), which is likely in part due to the thermal emission being sensitive
to large-scale curvature, especially at lower thermal inertia values Lagerros (1996).
5. Application to WISE Observations
In this section we apply our multi-epoch TPM approach to WISE observations of asteroids that were
used in our synthetic dataset. The TPM implimentation on the WISE data is the same as described in
section 3.5 except that we incorporate surface roughness in order to account for surface topography effects.
We step through three default roughness values (¯θ = 10◦, 29◦, 58◦) that Delbo' and Tanga (2009) used for
IRAS observations.
5.1. Data Description
The WISE mission, an astrophysics mission designed to map the entire sky, operated in its fully cryogenic
mode from 14 January to 5 August in 2010 at wavelengths centered near 3.4, 4.6, 12 and 22 µm, denoted
W1, W2, W3 & W4 (Wright et al., 2010). A data-processing enhancement called NEOWISE (Mainzer et al.,
2011a) detected moving Solar System objects, most of which were asteroids in the main-belt and in near-
Earth orbits. During each grouping of observations (epoch), a moving object is typically detected around 10
to 20 times, in ∼1.6 hr multiples - the orbital period of the spacecraft. This means that flux measurements
are separated in time by more than ∼1.6 hr. Therefore, depending on the object's range of motion on the
sky, each epoch of observations can potentially span up to 36 hr. NEOWISE reports each moving object
detection to the Minor Planet Center (MPC6), where the start time, RA and Dec of each observation can be
retrieved. The set of times and locations are used to parse the WISE All-Sky Single Exposure (L1b) catalog
on the Infrared Science Archive (IRSA) maintained by the Infrared Science and Analysis Center (IPAC7).
We select detections reported to within 10(cid:48)(cid:48) and 10 s of those reported to the MPC. These constraints are
"relaxed" relative to the accuracy of the telescope's astrometric precision to guarantee that IPAC returns
flux information for each reported MPC observation. These criteria also return many spurious detections.
We discuss in the following our method of rejecting spurious sources returned from these generous search
criteria.
6http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/
7http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/Missions/wise.html
17
Object
UT Date 1 ∆tobs
2 Nobs
3 RAU
4 ∆AU
5
α (◦)6
W 37
♦W 38
Table 3: WISE Observation Circumstances and Fluxes
(167) Urda
(183) Istria
(208) Lacrimosa
(413) Edburga
(509) Iolanda
(771) Libera
(857) Glasenappia
(984) Gretia
(1036) Ganymed
(1140) Crimea
(1188) Gothlandia
(1291) Phryne
(1432) Ethiopia
(1495) Helsinki
(1568) Aisleen
(1607) Mavis
9 Feb 2010
1.257
2 Aug 2010
1.257
4 Feb 2010
3.772
21 Jul 2010
1.257
10 Feb 2010
0.595
8 Aug 2010
1.257
10 Feb 2010
1.257
26 Jul 2010
1.257
18 Jan 2010
0.596
3 Jul 2010
1.257
29 Jan 2010
1.257
16 Jul 2010
3.903
19 Jan 2010
1.125
11 Jul 2010
1.389
31 Jan 2010
1.125
21 Jul 2010
1.125
15 Jan 2010
0.860
22 Jun 2010
1.125
13 Feb 2010
1.125
1 Aug 2010
1.124
18 Jan 2010
0.992
2 Jul 2010
1.389
21 Jan 2010
0.992
8 Jul 2010
1.257
4 Feb 2010
3.771
28 Jul 2010
1.389
8 Feb 2010
4.301
5 Aug 2010
1.125
24 Jan 2010
1.125
7 Jul 2010
1.257
21 Jan 2010
0.993
4 Jul 2010
1.125
23 Jan 2010
0.992
13
12
22
13
9
10
14
15
8
15
10
22
14
17
9
10
9
14
11
11
10
16
8
14
23
15
19
10
12
14
10
12
11
2.840
2.647
20.33
2.787
2.510
-21.27
3.718
3.580
15.38
3.765
3.562
-15.62
2.888
2.700
19.98
2.913
2.645
-20.30
3.180
3.009
18.08
2.701
2.427
-22.01
3.342
3.164
17.11
3.327
3.080
-17.72
2.764
2.593
20.88
3.111
2.847
-18.97
2.329
2.085
24.99
2.172
1.823
-27.75
3.324
3.188
17.24
3.159
2.920
-18.71
3.897
3.729
14.61
3.463
3.241
-17.02
3.075
2.900
18.73
2.990
2.725
-19.76
2.580
2.354
22.41
2.521
2.222
-23.68
3.210
3.038
17.85
3.090
2.825
-19.12
2.699
2.511
21.43
2.307
1.992
-26.02
2.490
2.284
23.33
2.267
1.940
-26.47
2.950
2.776
19.50
3.100
2.550
-21.04
3.285
3.116
17.43
3.039
2.778
-19.47
2.333
2.109
24.96
(1980) Tezcatlipoca
30 Jun 2010
1.257
8
2.064
1.716
-29.39
18
451.8 ± 5.2
601.1 ± 7.2
87.65 ± 1.27
70.84 ± 1.19
508.2 ± 5.7
442.4 ± 4.9
164.9 ± 2.2
478.4 ± 5.8
440.3 ± 5.1
470.5 ± 6.0
223.7 ± 2.8
146.2 ± 2.1
180.8 ± 2.4
279.2 ± 3.5
161.3 ± 2.2
192.6 ± 2.5
72.50 ± 1.10
141.3 ± 2.1
184.4 ± 2.4
220.7 ± 2.9
59.19 ± 1.11
88.37 ± 1.40
117.5 ± 1.8
131.0 ± 2.1
15.44 ± 0.60
32.16 ± 0.76
90.81 ± 1.46
140.6 ± 2.0
27.39 ± 0.68
52.16 ± 0.90
28.51 ± 0.71
35.16 ± 0.73
13.79 ± 0.53
29.65 ± 0.73
141.6 ± 10.3
185.9 ± 13.8
36.88 ± 2.57
43.98 ± 2.23
119.8 ± 10.6
97.78 ± 9.89
72.85 ± 3.98
180.3 ± 11.6
230.6 ± 9.9
216.4 ± 12.2
74.50 ± 5.24
75.75 ± 4.31
70.40 ± 5.26
80.68 ± 6.9
76.53 ± 4.46
81.18 ± 5.08
12.50 ± 2.16
27.94 ± 4.14
77.33 ± 4.85
110.0 ± 5.1
41.00 ± 2.05
58.34 ± 2.47
122.0 ± 3.6
142.4 ± 4.3
4.102 ± 1.217
7.282 ± 1.496
42.36 ± 3.0
87.26 ± 4.38
14.91 ± 1.37
21.74 ± 1.84
20.45 ± 1.44
14.46 ± 1.44
5.748 ± 1.041
18.61 ± 1.54
W 47
1224 ± 26
1559 ± 30
322.7 ± 9.0
274.7 ± 8.0
1358 ± 28
1269 ± 25
534.7 ± 11.5
1219 ± 25
1405 ± 30
1461 ± 24
618.4 ± 15.4
474.6 ± 11.2
373.4 ± 9.3
527.0 ± 12.7
531.1 ± 10.99
604.3 ± 14.8
294.7 ± 7.0
494.8 ± 12.1
524.7 ± 12.0
624.5 ± 12.6
158.7 ± 6.3
214.4 ± 6.8
367.8 ± 9.7
393.8 ± 11.4
43.91 ± 3.48
78.34 ± 3.84
208.3 ± 6.6
299.8 ± 8.3
82.59 ± 3.85
135.1 ± 4.8
94.41 ± 4.53
107.9 ± 3.9
34.52 ± 2.83
65.74 ± 3.46
♦W 48
350.2 ± 65.8
480.7 ± 51.1
119.9 ± 16.1
160.0 ± 14.9
344.8 ± 57.3
255.1 ± 48.3
208.9 ± 24.1
410.4 ± 42.0
594.3 ± 67.6
649.9 ± 40.7
223.4 ± 28.7
223.2 ± 19.7
127.4 ± 23.6
164.6 ± 21.7
214.3 ± 19.85
258.7 ± 32.8
39.25 ± 14.02
81.66 ± 24.09
201.6 ± 26.8
290.7 ± 24.4
99.88 ± 12.78
129.9 ± 11.8
350.8 ± 18.2
386.3 ± 18.9
17.13 ± 8.23
14.90 ± 7.49
81.53 ± 12.85
154.2 ± 16.5
51.08 ± 7.46
63.58 ± 9.57
63.07 ± 8.75
48.81 ± 8.31
22.68 ± 5.61
42.50 ± 6.61
Table 3 -- continued
Object
UT Date1 ∆tobs
2 Nobs
3 RAU
4 ∆AU
5
α (◦)6
W 37
(2156) Kate
(4611) Vulkaneifel
(5625) 1991 AO2
(6159) 1991 YH
25 Jan 2010
0.992
9
2.688
2.502
21.49
11 Jul 2010
1.126
25 Jan 2010
0.993
11 Jul 2010
1.257
28 Jan 2010
0.993
14 Jul 2010
1.125
3 Feb 2010
4.301
30 Jul 2010
1.389
11
10
13
11
13
19
11
2.625
2.322
-22.67
3.103
2.944
18.50
3.100
2.834
-19.05
3.180
3.032
18.04
3.168
2.900
-18.61
2.341
2.124
24.91
2.424
2.120
-24.67
23.82 ± 0.68
24.93 ± 0.66
21.82 ± 0.66
25.08 ± 0.65
28.80 ± 0.72
34.55 ± 0.83
13.21 ± 0.84
14.90 ± 0.59
♦W 38
16.42 ± 1.38
15.41 ± 1.29
10.80 ± 1.36
13.63 ± 1.25
19.98 ± 1.43
31.91 ± 1.63
11.16 ± 1.49
11.15 ± 1.17
W 47
64.43 ± 3.85
66.16 ± 3.66
72.11 ± 3.44
81.09 ± 3.86
91.72 ± 4.18
107.8 ± 4.3
31.40 ± 3.64
36.87 ± 3.36
♦W 48
34.34 ± 8.27
37.33 ± 7.50
31.03 ± 7.05
40.84 ± 7.26
49.67 ± 8.86
100.6 ± 7.7
27.42 ± 7.01
27.63 ± 6.68
All mean flux and range values are in units of mJy = 10−29 Wm−2 Hz−1.
1UT date of the first observation
2Time spanned by observations (days)
3Number of observations used
4Mean Heliocentric distance
5Mean WISE-centric distance
6Mean solar phase angle
7Lightcurve-averaged mean flux
8Photometric range of lightcurve
According to the WISE Explanatory Supplement (Cutri et al., 2012) photometric profile fits are unreliable
for W3 < -3 mag or W4 < -4 mag, due to saturation of the detector. Since non-linearity is present for sources
with W3 < 3.6 mag and W4 < -0.6 mag, we increase the magnitude uncertainty to 0.2 mag for objects brighter
than these values (Mainzer et al., 2011b). We shift the isophotal wavelengths and zero magnitude point of
W3 & W4 to account for the red-blue calibrator discrepancy described in the Explanatory Supplement. The
raw magnitudes that are reported were calibrated assuming that the flux across each filter was that of Vega's
spectrum. Thus a color-correction must be made to account for the discrepancy between the spectrum of
the object to that of Vega (Wright et al., 2010; Cutri et al., 2012). For each individual observation, NEATM
was used to calculate the flux spectrum across the full bandpass for each WISE band for use in the color
correction, which ranged from 0.87 to 1.0 for W3 and was nearly constant at 0.98 for W4. Based on an
analysis of asteroid flux uncertainties in consecutive frames by Hanus et al. (2015), we increase the flux error
in W3 & W4 by a factor of 1.4 and 1.3, respectively.
In order to filter out bad observations of an asteroid, for example in a situation in which it passes near a
background star or when the query returns a detection of an unwanted object, we employ "Peirce's criterion"8
(Peirce, 1852; Gould, 1855) as outlined and demonstrated by Ross (2003). We flag spurious observations
using this algorithm based on W4 -- W3, since it will identify and remove sources of an anomalous color
temperature. Using color, rather than raw flux, avoids the possibility of removing seemingly anomalous
8This procedure for rejecting outlier data points uses a criterion based on Gaussian statistics. In short, rejection of a data
point occurs when the probability of the deviation from the mean obtained by retaining the data in question is less than that
of the deviation from the mean obtained by their rejection, multiplied by the probability of making as many, and no more,
outlier observations. The motivation for using this relatively obscure procedure is due to the fact that it makes no arbitary
assumptions about the cutoff for outliers and can be used to simultaneously identify multiple outliers. Peirce's criterion is
rigorous and generalized in its applicability, when compared to William Chauvenet's criterion (Taylor, 1997).
19
observations of the minimum or maximum flux of a highly elongated object. This rejection method is a
simpler alternative to that implemented by Al´ı-Lagoa et al. (2013); Hanus et al. (2015, 2018) on WISE data,
in which the WISE inertial source catalog was checked explicitly for possible flux contamination of stars.
Mean fluxes, denoted as W 3 & W 4, were calculated by simply taking the error-weighted mean of all
observations. The photometric range for each band, denoted as ♦W 3 & ♦W 4, was calculated by subtracting
the minimum and maximum fluxes. Standard error propagation was used to estimate 1-σ uncertainties for
each of these parameters, and input as σo in equation (17). These bright, slow-moving objects with Prot <
36 hr have sufficient coverage in rotational phase to provide estimates of these parameters. However, some
objects may have only been detected handful of times, which could only sparsely sample the rotational
phases. In a follow-up paper we will develop and present a more rigorous method for accurately estimating
the flux mean and range, with associated errors, from sparse lightcurve coverage.
Table 4: WISE Data TPM Results
pV
Γ*
a/b1
Spin2
χ2
min MBA/NEA
¯θ(◦)
38 ± 13
47 ± 13
41 ± 13
9 ± 6
18 ± 7
53 ± 39
< 20
53 ± 10
40 ± 32
23 ± 21
41 ± 27
45 ± 17
--
12 ± 8
46 ± 38
58 ± 50
57 ± 39
49 ± 32
< 53
> 36
1.51 ± 0.27
1.51 ± 0.27
1.51 ± 0.27
1.51 ± 0.27
1.51 ± 0.27
1.51 ± 0.27
2.16 ± 0.39
1.51 ± 0.27
1.08 ± 0.19
1.51 ± 0.27
1.51 ± 0.27
2.16 ± 0.39
1.51 ± 0.27
1.51 ± 0.27
2.16 ± 0.39
1.51 ± 0.27
1.51 ± 0.27
2.16 ± 0.39
1.51 ± 0.27
2.16 ± 0.39
1.51 ± 0.27
⇓
⇑
⇑
⇓
⇑
⇓
⇑
⇑
--
⇓
⇓
⇑
⇑
⇑
⇓
⇑
⇓
⇑
⇓
⇓
⇓
1.27
5.16
1.66
1.98
3.01
13.5
1.52
1.81
0.55
1.50
0.43
1.78
0.56
0.52
2.74
21.45
1.67
0.39
1.01
2.46
0.19
MBA
MBA
MBA
MBA
MBA
MBA
MBA
MBA
NEA
MBA
MBA
MBA
MBA
MBA
MBA
MBA
NEA
MBA
MBA
MBA
MBA
Object
(167) Urda
(183) Istria
(208) Lacrimosa
(413) Edburga
(509) Iolanda
(771) Libera†
(857) Glasenappia
(984) Gretia
(1036) Ganymed
(1140) Crimea
(1188) Gothlandia
(1291) Phryne
(1432) Ethiopia
(1495) Helsinki
(1568) Aisleen
(1607) Mavis†
(1980) Tezcatlipoca
(2156) Kate
(4611) Vulkaneifel
(5625) Jamesferguson
Deff (km)
39.48 ± 0.89
31.43 ± 2.92
40.44 ± 1.37
33.44 ± 1.75
54.39 ± 3.86
29.23 ± 2.10
13.62 ± 0.84
34.72 ± 1.18
35.85 ± 1.95
30.13 ± 1.18
13.52 ± 0.84
27.03 ± 1.65
7.15 ± 0.67
13.31 ± 0.59
11.66 ± 1.01
14.52 ± 1.72
5.68 ± 0.58
8.04 ± 0.45
12.10 ± 1.12
14.46 ± 0.86
5.65 ± 1.37
0.252+0.010
−0.019
0.288+0.029
−0.033
0.253+0.012
−0.014
0.169+0.012
−0.022
0.243+0.019
−0.027
0.160+0.013
−0.019
0.297+0.013
−0.021
0.227+0.012
−0.023
0.278+0.017
−0.027
0.276+0.020
−0.028
0.238+0.019
−0.022
0.186+0.014
−0.017
0.535+0.058
−0.070
0.271+0.017
−0.033
0.328+0.034
−0.038
0.249+0.032
−0.037
0.205+0.035
−0.040
0.294+0.021
−0.025
0.216+0.023
−0.028
0.062+0.005
−0.006
0.247+0.061
−0.061
51+20−16
21+12−10
77+31−22
41+19−10
8.6+12.2−8.6
61+34−26
58+30−24
28+8−7
15+22−15
23+15−23
38+21−13
20+16−6
71+180−65
19+13−13
51+41−22
37+42−25
170+170−110
56+23−23
32+23−32
52+14−15
60+177−60
20
(6159) Andreseloy
*Thermal inertia values are in SI units (Jm−2K−1s−1/2).
1a/b values are adjusted downward by 16% to account for the over-estimation as described in section 4.2.
2Indicates either prograde (⇑) or retrograde (⇓) spin direction.
†TPM results with χ2
min > 8 and thus should be used with caution.
--
5.2. Results and Discussion
A summary of our TPM fits and corresponding 1-σ uncertainties are given in table 4. For diameter,
albedo and thermal inertia, uncertainties are based on the χ2 values calculated during the fitting routine. In
some cases two values of roughness could not be distinguished as better than the other, so both values are
reported. In the case of (6159) Andreseloy all roughness values tried provided statistically indistinguishable
fits to the data. The spin direction reported for each object here reflects the preferred spin vector. Often,
many spin vector solutions lie within the 1-σ uncertainty bounds, thus reporting a single solution would not
be meaningful. The spin direction of (1036) Ganymed could not be independently determined here, which
is likely due to the nearly-spherical shape of the object combined with its low thermal inertia reducing the
asymmetry of the thermal phase curve, as demonstrated in figure 1(b).
Comparing the diameter estimates from NEATM fits presented by the WISE team (i.e. Mainzer et al.,
2011b; Masiero et al., 2011) to the values obtained here, we observe agreement (within ± 15% of another)
between the two sets of results. Yet, for objects ∼40 km and above, TPM diameter estimates are systemat-
ically higher. The objects in question (Urda, Lacrimosa and Iolanda) did not saturate, nor were they bright
enough to lie in the non-linear regime of the WISE detectors. This discrepancy may be due to one the flux
corrections described above or from the model differences between our TPM approach and the NEATM
used by the WISE team.
When comparing to more previous works, our results are consistent with the thermal inertias reported:
(771) Libera and (1980) Tezcatlipoca have thermal inertia estimates of 65 +85/-35 and 220+380/ − 204
Jm−2K−1s−1/2, respectively, made by (Hanus et al., 2015), though the reader should take note that the
high chi-square indicate that our fits for Libera were relatively poor, contributing to the relatively high
parameter uncertainties. (1036) Ganymed has several thermal inertia estimates: 24 ± 8 (Rozitis et al.,
2018), 35 +65/-29 (Hanus et al., 2015), and 214 ± 80 Jm−2K−1s−1/2 (Rivkin et al., 2017)9 The higher
estimates are around an order of magnitude greater than the smallest estimates and can be explained by the
thermal inertia dependency on surface temperature. Our thermal inertia estimate for Ganymed was based
on data collected at RAU = 3.5 and 3.8 and is thus consistent with similar estimates at the same distance.
9Instead of a TPM analysis, this work employed an approach pioneered by Harris and Drube (2016) in which the NEATM
η value is used to indirectly determine the thermal inertia.
21
Figure 5: Top: Comparison of the effective diameter values obtained by Masiero et al. (2011) and Mainzer et al. (2011b) to
our reported TPM values. Purple, upward-facing and green, downward-facing triangles are data collected at pre- and post-
opposition, respectively. Bottom: Comparison of thermal inertia estimates for eleven objects by Hanus et al. (2018), in teal
open circles, to ours, in red filled circles.
22
Figure 6: Thermal inertia versus diameter values from this work compared along with previous estimates. The bottom panel
shows thermal inertia adjusted for heliocentric distance, as per the text (Rozitis et al., 2018).
Eleven objects in this study have been analyzed by the recent work of Hanus et al. (2018), in which the
varied-shape TPM was used to derive thermophysical properties from the WISE dataset. A comparison of
the thermal inertias for each of these objects in shown in the right panel of figure 5. Some objects have
two estimates presented in Hanus et al. (2018) due to ambiguous shape models that produce equivalent
fits to the data. For 7 out of these 11 objects, there is very good agreement (i.e. the estimates are within
the 1-sigma uncertainties) between the estimates from their work and ours. We note that our model fit for
(1607) Mavis was noticeably inaccurate, as indicated by the large χ2
min in table 4, for which we note the
error bars for each parameter are noticeably large10 and consistent with Hanus et al. (2018). For two objects,
(413) Edburga and (984) Gretia, the 1-sigma error bars just barely miss overlapping and two others, (167)
Urda and (1495) Helsinki, have very different estimates. The two of estimates Hanus et al. (2018) present
for (167) Urda are just over twice as large as ours and have very small reported uncertainties of ±5. Hanus
10As a reminder, parameter uncertainties are scaled by χ2
min values in order to account for best-fit TPM fluxes that deviate
from the measured fluxes.
23
et al. (2018) report a thermal inertia just over zero for (1495) Helsinki, also with a very small uncertainty.
For each of these objects, our 2-sigma uncertainty bounds encompass the Hanus et al. (2018) estimates and
both works overall appear to deliver no systematically different estimates from another.
With the combination of our TPM results with the subset compiled by Delbo' et al. (2015) and the
large dataset of Hanus et al. (2018), we note that the number of known thermal inertias of objects in the
5 -- 50 km size range increases by 20. Restricting our analysis to the compolated thermal inertias from Delbo'
et al. (2015), we detect a negative correlation with diameter (figure 6) evidenced by the Spearman's rank
coefficient of rs = -0.55; this correlation remains when including the ∼120 thermal inertias of Hanus et al.
(2018). From the findings of Rozitis et al. (2018), however, thermal inertia should be adjusted to account
for it's dependency on heliocentric distance by using the formula: Γ = Γ0Ra
AU. Doing this allows for a better
comparison of hot, small NEAs and cool, larger MBAs as the effects of temperature are partially accounted
for. We use a = 3/4 here, which was eariler suggested by Delbo' et al. (2015) and Mueller et al. (2010). Even
when performing the adjustment on asteroid thermal inertias, the correlation remains statistically significant
(with rs = -0.41 and p < 0.001) as shown in the bottom panel of figure 6. However, this correlation becomes
insignificant if we use a = 4/3, which is large but well within the range of empirically derived values from
analyzing individual objects (i.e. Ganymed and 2002 CE26; Rozitis et al., 2018). While the purpose of this
work is not to investigate this dependency, in a follow-up work we plan to increase the number thermal
inertia estimates of small main-belt asteroids, combine our results with Hanus et al. (2018), and revisit this
dependency in much greater detail.
The prograde/retrograde spin directions reported here are in agreement with those from DAMIT (table 1)
with the exception of three objects: (208) Lacrimosa, (1495) Helsinki, and (6159) Andreseloy. Incorporating
the ambiguous spin direction for Ganymed, this means that 17 out of 21 (81 ± 9%) objects had matched
the spin vectors in the DAMIT shape models. Comparing this result to the findings of our proof-of-concept
study in section 4.2, there is a noticeable difference. Assuming the DAMIT shape models are 100% accurate,
there is much improvement in the percent of synthetic objects in which the spin direction was correctly
identified (∼ 58 and ∼ 67% for ellipsoids and a sphere, respectively). When broken down by thermal
inertia, as in panel (f) of figure 3, these results are comparable to the best-case scenario (spherical shape for
Γ = 40 Jm−2K−1s−1/2), and outperforms each situation in which an ellipsoid shape is used. A reasonable
explanation for this discrepancy is the inclusion of roughness in the real-world application of the TPM,
which adds to the asymmetry of the thermal phase curve - particularly for asteroids in the main-belt (e.g.
figure 1(b)).
6. Summary and Future Work
The opportunity to constrain diagnostic thermophysical properties of asteroids by constraining the multi-
wavelength phase curves will become more common with the advent of more thermal infrared survey tele-
scopes. We have demonstrated in this paper the accuracy and precision of estimating various asteroid
parameters using only pre- and post-opposition multi-wavelength thermal observations for an object, with-
out the aid of a known shape model. By varying the a/b axis of a prolate ellipsoid shape model and sampling
from a grid of several spin vectors, unique solutions for diameter/albedo, thermal inertia, and the elongation
of an object can be ascertained. A small correction to the best-estimate a/b axis is applied to account
for the overestimation of the elongation of the body. Constraints on surface roughness and sense of spin
direction are more difficult to obtain, most likely due to the relatively low number of data points compared
to the number of free parameters we used in the TPM approach. Additional multi-wavelength observations
taken close to opposition would increase the precision of the surface roughness estimate, as the flux beaming
effect from surface topography is most pronounced in this configuration. Spin axis estimates would also
benefit from additional sets of observations taken at another observing geometry. The strong correlation
between the peak-to-trough flux range and the sub-solar latitude can be exploited in this case to increase
the accuracy and precision of the spin axis orientation.
The TPM approach outlined int this work was applied to 21 asteroids: 19 MBAs and 2 NEAs (table 4).
Our follow-up paper will feature diameter, albedo, thermal inertia, and roughness estimates for over two-
hundred asteroids that were observed by WISE. Results pertaining to surface roughness, shape, and spin
24
sense will also be provided. Future work will focus on investigating and improving upon the accuracy and
precision of shape and spin using ellipsoids and multi-epoch thermal observations. With the release of
WISE/NEOWISE survey data and large-scale visible (e.g. Pan-STARRS and LSST) surveys it is important
that appropriate models are developed alongside the releases of these data sets.
In particular, sensitive
surveys will discover and observe smaller objects and may be the only available observations for newly
discovered, faint asteroids. Thus, models that can make use of these survey observations in order to derive
asteroid physical properties will be valuable.
Acknowledgments
EMM greatly appreciates the support from the NASA Earth and Space Sciences Fellowship (# NNX14AP21H).
This publication makes use of data products from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, which is a joint
project of the University of California, Los Angeles, and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute
of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Appendix A. TPM Numerical Techniques
The parameterized version of the time-dependent, one-dimensional heat diffusion equation is:
∂T (cid:48)(z, t(cid:48))
∂t(cid:48)
= Θ
∂2T (cid:48)(z, t(cid:48))
∂x(cid:48)2
(A.1)
where temperature, time and depth are parameterized into dimensionless form by: T (cid:48) = T/Teq, t(cid:48) = tω/Θ,
x(cid:48) = x/ls. To numerically implement the time-dependent one-dimensional heat diffusion equation we employ
the Crank-Nicolson finite-difference approach (Press et al., 2007). Equation (A.1) is discretized into small
finite elements with depth increments of δx(cid:48) and time increments of δt(cid:48). If T (cid:48)n
is the temperature at time
t(cid:48) = nδt(cid:48) and depth z = jδx(cid:48):
j
− T (cid:48)n
T (cid:48)n+1
δt(cid:48)
j
j
j+1 − 2T (cid:48)n+1
(T (cid:48)n+1
j
=
Θ
2
+ T (cid:48)n+1
j−1 ) + (T (cid:48)n
(δx(cid:48))2
Grouping the terms by time step gives:
(cid:0) 2(δx(cid:48))2
Θδt(cid:48) − 2(cid:1) + T (cid:48)n
T (cid:48)n
j−1 + T (cid:48)n
j
j+1 = −T (cid:48)n+1
j−1 + T (cid:48)n+1
j
For D depth steps a set of linear equations can be represented by the matrix equation:
.
j−1)
j + T (cid:48)n
j+1 − 2T (cid:48)n
Θδt(cid:48) + 2(cid:1) − T (cid:48)n+1
(cid:0) 2(δx(cid:48))2
d0
d1
...
j+1
dD−1
dD
=
(A.2)
(A.3)
(A.4)
j+1 and the upper (surface) and lower boundary
− T (cid:48)n+1
0
)
(A.5)
(A.6)
0
a −1
. . .
. . .
. . . −1
···
a −1
−1
0
...
0
j−1 +T (cid:48)n+1
j
dT (cid:48)
dx(cid:48)
0
1
T (cid:48)n
T (cid:48)n
...
T (cid:48)n
D−1
T (cid:48)n
D
···
0
...
. . .
. . .
0
a −1
a
(cid:0) 2(δx(cid:48))2
Θδt(cid:48) −2(cid:1)+T (cid:48)n
(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)surf
δx(cid:48) (T (cid:48)n+1
D−1 = 0.
=
D − T (cid:48)n
T (cid:48)n
0 −1
1
1
where a = 2(δx(cid:48))2
conditions implimented as such:
Θδt(cid:48) +2 and dj = T (cid:48)n+1
This system of equations is solved via the tridag routine provided in Press et al. (2007). We choose
δx(cid:48) = ls/5 and calculate temperatures down to 10 ls. The time steps, δt(cid:48), are varied such that for Θ = 0.055
25
and 100 there are 1440 and 360 time steps per rotation, respectively. To establish if temperature convergence
has been reached for a particular latitude bin we utilize an energy balance criterion to the latest rotation or
ensure that the temperatures have not changed substantially from the previous rotation.
Appendix B. Transformation from a Spherical to Ellipsoidal Shape
A generalized ellipsoid with semi-axes a ≥ b ≥ c is given in Cartesian coordinates by
and can be parameterized using body-centric coordinates, θ and φ, in the following way:
x2
a2 +
y2
b2 +
z2
c2 − 1 = 0,
x = a cos(θ) cos(φ)
y = b sin(θ) cos(φ)
z = c sin(φ)
(B.1)
(B.2)
(B.3)
(B.4)
for θ ∈ [0, 2π) and φ ∈ [− π
2 ] the body-centric longitude and latitude, respectively. This chosen convention
implies that an ellipsoid body rotates around the +c-axis, in the +θ direction, as per the right-hand rule.
The directional derivatives of the radius vector, r = (cid:104)x, y, z(cid:105), with respect to the body-centric coordinates
can then be used to find the normal vector to the surface at every point:
2 , π
= (cid:104)−a sin(θ) cos(φ), b cos(θ) cos(φ), 0(cid:105)
Rθ ≡ ∂r
∂θ
= (cid:104)−a cos(θ) sin(φ),−b sin(θ) sin(φ), c cos(φ)(cid:105)
Rφ ≡ ∂r
∂θ
n = Rθ × Rφ = cos2(φ)(cid:104)bc cos(θ), ac sin(θ), ab tan(φ)(cid:105)
(cid:107)n(cid:107) = cos2 φ [ c2 (a2 sin2 φ + b2 cos2 θ) + a2b2 tan2 φ]
1/2
(B.5)
(B.6)
(B.7)
(B.8)
An area element, (dA), on the ellipsoid surface can now be expressed as a function of the parameterized
coordinates:
dA = (cid:107)n(cid:107) dθ dφ = cos2 φ [ c2 (a2 sin2 φ + b2 cos2 θ) + a2b2 tan2 φ]
(B.9)
The surface-normal longitude, ϑ, is calculated by projecting the surface-normal vector onto the x − y plane
and then taking the dot product with x:
1/2
dθ dφ.
cos(ϑ) =
cos2 φ(cid:104)bc cos θ, ac sin θ, 0(cid:105)
cos2 φ [ c2 (a2 sin2 φ + b2 cos2 θ)]1/2
· (cid:104)1, 0, 0(cid:105).
(B.10)
The surface-normal latitude, ϕ, is calculated by taking the dot product of the surface-normal vector and z:
sin(ϕ) =
cos2 φ(cid:104)bc cos θ, ac sin θ, ab tan φ(cid:105)
cos2 φ [ c2 (a2 sin2 φ + b2 cos2 θ) + a2b2 tan2 φ]
· (cid:104)0, 0, 1(cid:105)
1/2
(B.11)
Simplifying, results in two transformation equations for converting body-centric coordinates to surface-
normal coordinates:
tan(ϑ) =
tan θ
(B.12)
(cid:18) a
(cid:19)
b
26
(cid:32)
(cid:33)
ab
c
tan(ϕ) =
tan(φ)
(a2 sin2 θ + b2 sin2 θ)1/2
.
(B.13)
and
References
A. W. Harris, A Thermal Model for Near-Earth Asteroids, Icarus 131 (1998) 291 -- 301.
L. A. Lebofsky, G. J. Veeder, , M. J. Lebofsky, D. L. Matson, Visual and radiometric photometry of 1580 Betulia, Icarus 35
(1978) 336 -- 343.
L. A. Lebofsky, M. V. Sykes, E. F. Tedesco, G. J. Veeder, D. L. Matson, R. H. Brown, J. C. Gradie, M. A. Feierberg, R. J.
Rudy, A Refined 'Standard' Thermal Model for Asteroids Based on Observations of 1 Ceres and 2 Pallas, Icarus 68 (1986)
239 -- 251.
S. D. Wolters, S. F. Green, Investigation of Systematic Bias in Radiometric Diameter Determination of near-Earth Asteroids:
The Night Emission Simulated Thermal Model (NESTM), Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 400 (2009)
204 -- 218.
N. Myhrvold, eComparing NEO Search Telescopes, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 128 (2016) 045004.
J. R. Spencer, L. A. Lebofsky, M. V. Sykes, Systematic Biases in Radiometric Diameter Determinations, Icarus 78 (1989)
337 -- 354.
J. R. Spencer, A Rough-Surface Thermophysical Model for Airless Planets, Icarus 83 (1990) 27 -- 38.
J. S. V. Lagerros, Thermal Physics of Asteroids I. Effects of Shape, Heat Conduction and Beaming, Astronomy and Astrophysics
310 (1996) 1011 -- 1020.
M. Delbo', A. dell'Oro, A. W. Harris, S. Mottola, M. Mueller, Thermal Inertia of near-Earth Asteroids and Implications for
the Magnitude of the Yarkovsky Effect, Icarus 190 (2007) 236 -- 249.
M. Mueller, Surface Properties of Asteroids from Mid-Infrared Observations and Thermophysical Modeling, Ph.D. thesis, Freie
Universitaet Berlin, URL http://www.diss.fu-berlin.de/2007/471/indexe.html, 2007.
B. Rozitis, S. F. Green, Directional Characteristics of ThermalInfrared Beaming from Atmosphereless Planetary Surfaces A
New Thermophysical Model, Monthy Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 415 (2011) 2042 -- 2062.
M. Delbo', M. Mueller, J. P. Emery, B. Rozitis, M. T. Capria, Asteroid Thermophysical Modeling, in: P. Michel, F. E. DeMeo,
W. F. Bottke (Eds.), Asteroids IV, University of Arizona Press, 107 -- 128, 2015.
J. P. Emery, Y. R. Fern´andez, M. S. P. Kelley, K. T. Warden, C. Hergenrother, D. S. Lauretta, M. J. Drake, H. Campins,
J. Ziffer, Thermal Infrared Observations and Thermophysical Characterization and OSIRIS-REx Target Asteroid (101955)
Bennu, Icarus 234 (2014) 17 -- 35.
J. Hanus, M. Delbo', J. Durech, V. Al´ı-Lagoa, Thermophysical Modeling of Asteroids from WISE Thermal Infrared Data
Significance of the Shape Model and the Pole Orientation Uncertainties, Icarus 256 (2015) 101 -- 116.
J. Hanus, M. Delbo', J. Durech, V. Al´ı-Lagoa, Thermophysical Modeling of Main-Belt Asteroids from WISE Thermal Data,
Icarus 309 (2018) 297 -- 337.
Z. A. Landsman, J. P. Emery, H. Campins, J. Hanu, L. F. Lim, D. P. Cruikshank, Asteroid (16) Psyche: Evidence for a silicate
regolith from spitzer space telescope spectroscopy, Icarus 304 (2018) 58 -- 73, ISSN 0019-1035.
B. Rozitis, S. F. Green, Physical Characterisation of near-Earth Asteroid (1620) Geographos: Reconciling Radar and Thermal-
Infrared Observations, Astronomy and Astrophysics 568 (2014) A43.
B. Rozitis, E. MacLennan, J. P. Emery, Cohesive forces prevent the rotational breakup of rubble-pile asteroid (29075) 1950
DA, Nature 512 (2014) 174 -- 176, ISSN 0028-0836.
B. Rozitis, S. F. Green, E. MacLennan, J. P. Emery, Observing the Variation of Asteroid Thermal Inertia with Heliocentric
Distance, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 477 (2018) 1782 -- 1802.
J. Durech, DAMIT: A Database of Asteroid Models, Astronomy and Astrophysics 513 (2010) A46.
A. Mainzer, , J. Bauer, T. Grav, J. Masiero, R. M. Cutri, J. Dailey, P. Eisenhardt, R. S. McMillan, E. Wright, R. W. andRobert
Jedicke, T. Spahr, D. J. Tholen, R. Alles, B. Beck, H. Brandenburg, T. Conrow, T. Evans, J. Fowler, T. Jarrett, K. Marsh,
F. Masci, H. McCallon, S. Wheelock, M. Wittman, P. Wyatt, E. DeBaun, G. Elliot, D. Elsbury, T. G. IV, S. Gomillion,
D. Leisawitz, C. Maleszewski, M. Micheli, A. Wilkins, Preliminary Results from NEOWISE: An Enhancement to the Wide-
Field Infrared Survey Explorer for Solar System Science, Astrophysical Journal 731 (2011a) 53 -- 66.
T. G. Muller, J. Durech, S. Hasegawa, M. Abe, K. Kawakami, T. Kasuga, D. Kinoshita, D. Kuroda, S. Urakawa, S. Okumura,
Y. Sarugaku, S. Miyasaka, Y. Takagi, P. R. Weissman, Y.-J. Choi, S. Larson, K. Yanagisawa, S. Nagayama, Thermo-
physical properties of 162173 (1993 JU3) a Potential Flyby and Rendezvous Target for Interplanetary Missions, Astronomy
and Astrophysics 525 (2011) A145.
T. G. Muller, S. Hasegawa, F. Usui, (25143) Itokawa: The Power of Radiometric Techniques for the Interpretation of Remote
Thermal Observations in the Light of the Hayabusa Rendezvous Results, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan
66 (2014) 52.
T. G. Muller, J. Durech, M. Ishiguro, M. Mueller, T. Krhler, H. Yang, M.-J. Kim, L. O'Rourke, F. Usui, C. Kiss, B. Altieri,
B. Carry, Y.-J. Choi, M. Delbo, J. P. Emery, J. Greiner, S. Hasegawa, J. L. Hora, F. Knust, D. Kuroda, D. Osip, A. Rau,
A. Rivkin, P. Schady, J. Thomas-Osip, D. Trilling, S. Urakawa, E. Vilenius, P. Weissman, P. Zeidler, Hayabusa-2 mission
target asteroid 162173 Ryugu (1999 JU3): Searching for the object's spin-axis orientation, Astronomy & Astrophysics 599
(2017) A103.
27
J. Durech, M. Delbo', B. Carry, J. Hanus, V. Al´ı-Lagoa, Asteroid Shapes and Thermal Properties from Combined Optical and
Mid-Infrared Photometry Inversion, Astronomy and Astrophysics 604 (2017) A27.
C. Frohlich, Evidence of a Long-Term Trend in Total Solar Irradiance, Astronomy and Astrophysics 501 (2009) L27 -- L30.
D. E. Trilling, M. Mueller, J. L. Hora, A. W. Harris, B. Bhattacharya, W. F. Bottke, S. Chesley, M. Delbo', J. P. Emery,
G. Fazio, A. Mainzer, B. Penprase, H. A. Smith, T. B. Spahr, J. A. Stansberry, C. A. Thomas, ExploreNEOs. I. Description
and First Results from the Warm Spitzer Near-Earth Object Survey, Icarus 140 (2010) 770 -- 784.
A. Mainzer, T. Grav, J. Bauer, J. Masiero, R. S. McMillan, R. M. Cutri, R. Walker, E. Wright, P. Eisenhardt, D. J. Tholen,
T. Spahr, R. Jedicke, L. Denneau, E. DeBaun, D. Elsbury, T. Gautier, S. Gomillion, E. Hand, W. Mo, J. Watkins, A. Wilkins,
G. L. Bryngelson, A. D. P. Molina, S. Desai, G. Camu, S. L. Hidalgo, I. Kostantopoulos, J. A. Larsen, C. Maleszewski,
M. A. Malkan, J.-C. Mauduit, B. L. Mullan, E. W. Olszewski, J. Pforr, A. Saro, J. V. Scotti, L. H. Wasserman, NEOWISE
Observations of near-Earth Objects: Preliminary Results, The Astrophysical Journal 743 (2011b) 156 -- 173.
J. R. Masiero, A. K. Mainzer, T. Grav, J. M. Bauer, R. M. Cutri, J. Dailey, P. R. M. Eisenhardt, R. S. McMillan, T. B. Spahr,
M. F. Skrutskie, D. Tholen, R. G. Walker, E. L. Wright, E. DeBaun, D. Elsbury, T. G. IV, S. Gomillion, A. Wilkins, Main
Belt Asteroids with WISE/NEOWISE. I. Preliminary Albedos and Diameters, The Astrophysical Journal 741 (2011) 68 -- 88.
A. W. Harris, J. S. V. Lagerros, Asteroids in the Thermal Infrared, in: W. F. Bottke, A. Cellino, P. Paolicchi, R. P. Binzel
(Eds.), Asteroids III, University of Arizona Press, 205 -- 218, 2002.
J. P. Emery, A. L. Sprague, R. F. Witteborn, J. E. Colwell, R. W. H. Kozlowski, D. H. Wooden, Mercury: Thermal Modeling
and Mid-infrared (512 µm) Observations, Icarus 136 (1998) 104 -- 123.
B. J. R. Davidsson, H. Rickman, Surface Roughness and Three-Dimensional Heat Conduction in Thermophysical Models,
Icarus 243 (2014) 58 -- 77.
B. J. R. Davidsson, H. Rickman, J. L. Bandfield, O. Groussin, P. J. Guti´errez, M. Wilska, M. T. Capria, J. P. Emery, J. Helbert,
L. Jorda, A. Maturilli, T. G. Mueller, Interpretation of Thermal Emission I. The Effect of Roughness for Spatially Resolved
Atmosphereless Bodies, Icarus 252 (2015) 1 -- 21.
D. A. Allen, Infrared Diameter of Vesta, Nature 227 (1970) 158 -- 159.
D. Morrison, Determination of Radii of Satellites and Asteroids from Radiometry and Photometry, Icarus 19 (1973) 1 -- 14.
L. A. Lebofsky, G. H. Rieke, Thermal properties of 433 Eros, Icarus 40 (1979) 297 -- 308.
A. W. Harris, J. K. Davies, Physical Characteristics of Near-Earth Asteroids from Thermal Infrared Spectrophotometry, Icarus
142 (1999) 464 -- 475.
M. Delbo', A. W. Harris, R. P. Binzel, P. Pravec, J. K. Davies, Keck Observations of near-Earth Asteroids in the Thermal
Infrared, Icarus 166 (2003) 116 -- 130.
L. F. Lim, J. P. Emery, N. A. Moskovitz, Mineralogy and Thermal Properties of V-type Asteroid 956 Elisa: Evidence for
Diogenitic Material from the Spitzer IRS (535 µm) Spectrum, Icarus 213 (2011) 510 -- 523.
V. Al´ı-Lagoa, L. Lionni, M. Delbo', B. Gundlach, J. Blum, J. Licandro, Thermophysical Properties of near-Earth Asteroid
(341843) 2008 EV5 from WISE Data, Astronomy and Astrophysics 561 (2013) A45.
H. N. Russell, On the Albedo of Planets and their Natural Satellites, Astrophysical Journal 43 (3) (1916) 173 -- 196.
P. Pravec, A. W. Harris, Binary Asteroid Population 1. Angular Momentum Content, Icarus 190 (2007) 250 -- 259.
E. Bowell, B. Hapke, D. Domingue, K. Lumme, J. Peltoniemi, A. W. Harris, Application of Photometric Models to Asteroids,
in: R. P. Binzel, T. Gehrels, M. S. Matthews (Eds.), Asteroids II, University of Arizona Press, 524 -- 556, 1989.
M. Delbo', P. Tanga, Thermal Inertia of Main Belt Asteroids Smaller than 100 km from IRAS Data, Planetary and Space
Science 57 (2009) 259 -- 265.
A. W. Harris, L. Drube, Thermal Tomography of Asteroid Surface Structure, Astrophysical Journal 832 (2016) 127.
B. Rozitis, The Surface Roughness of (433) Eros as Measured by Thermal-Infrared Beaming, Monthy Notices of the Royal
Astronomical Society 464 (2017) 915923.
T. G. Muller, L. O'Rourke, A. M. Barucci, A. P´al, C. Kiss, P. Zeidler, Altieri, B. M. Gonz´alez-Garcia, M. Kuppers, Physical
Peroperties of OSIRIS-REx Target Asteroid (101955) 1999RQ36, Astronomy and Astrophysics 548 (2012) A36.
D. Morrison, Asteroid Sizes and Albedos, Icarus 31 (1977) 185 -- 220.
O. L. Hansen, On the Prograde Rotation of Asteroids, Icarus 32 (1977a) 458 -- 460.
O. L. Hansen, An Explanation of the Radiometric Method for Size and Albedo Determination, Icarus 31 (1977b) 456 -- 482.
B. Hapke, Bidirectional Reflectance Spectroscopy 3. Correction for Macroscopic Roughness, Icarus 59 (1984) 41 -- 59.
S. D. Wolters, B. Rozitis, S. R. Duddy, S. C. Lowry, S. F. Green, C. Snodgrass, O. R. Hainaut, P. Weissman, Physical
characterization of low delta-V asteroid (175706) 1996 FG3, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 418 (2011)
1246 -- 1257.
J. Durech, J. Hanus, M. Delbo, V. Al´ı-Lagoa, B. Carry, Physical Properties of Asteroids Derived from a Novel Approach to
Modeling of Optical Lightcurves and WISE Thermal Infrared Data, in: 46th AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting,
abstract #509.11, 2014.
J. Durech, B. Carry, M. Delbo', M. Kaasalainen, M. Viikinkoski, Asteroid Models from Multiple Data Sources, in: P. Michel,
F. E. DeMeo, W. F. Bottke (Eds.), Asteroids IV, University of Arizona Press, 183 -- 202, 2015.
R. Swinbank, R. J. Purser, Fibonacci Grids: A Novel Approach to Global Modelling, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteo-
rological Society 132 (2006) 1769 -- 1763.
R. P. Brent, Algorithms for Minimization without Derivatives, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1973.
W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes 3rd Edition, Cambridge University Press,
2007.
A. W. Harris, The surface properties of small asteroids from thermal-infrared observations, Proceedings of the International
Astronomical Union (2005) 449463.
E. Wright, Comparing the NEATM with a Rotating, Cratered Thermophysical Asteroid Model, http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-
28
ph/0703085, 2007.
B. Rozitis, S. F. Green, The Influence of Global Self-Heating on the Yarkovsky and YORP Effects, Monthy Notices of the
Royal Astronomical Society 433 (2013) 603 -- 621.
J. S. V. Lagerros, Thermal Physics of Asteroids III. Irregular Shapes and Albedo Variegations, Astronomy and Astrophysics
325 (1997) 1226 -- 1236.
B. Rozitis, S. R. Duddy, S. F. Green, S. C. Lowry, A Thermophysical Analysis of the (1862) Apollo Yarkovsky and YORP
Effects, Astronomy and Astrophysics 555 (2013) A20.
J. Durech, M. Delbo', B. Carry, Asteroid Models Derived from Thermal Infrared Data and Optical Lightcurves, in: Asteroids,
Comets, Meteors (ACM) 2012, LPI Contribution No. 1667, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, abstract #6118, 2012.
E. L. Wright, P. R. M. Eisenhardt, A. K. Mainzer, M. E. Ressler, R. M. Cutri, T. Jarrett, J. D. Kirkpatrick, D. Padgett, R. S.
McMillan, M. Skrutskie, S. A. Stanford, M. Cohen, R. G. Walker, J. C. Mather, D. Leisawitz, T. N. G. III, I. McLean,
D. Benford, C. J. Lonsdale, A. Blain, B. Mendez1, W. R. Irace, V. Duval, F. Liu, D. Royer, I. Heinrichsen, J. Howard,
M. Shannon, M. Kendall, A. L. Walsh, M. Larsen, J. G. Cardon, S. Schick, M. Schwalm, M. Abid, B. Fabinsky, L. Naes,
C.-W. Tsai, The Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): Mission Description and Initial On-Orbit Performance,
Astronomical Journal 140 (2010) 1868 -- 1881.
R. M. Cutri, E. L. Wright, T. Conrow, J. Bauer, D. Benford, H. Brandenburg, J. Dailey, P. R. M. Eisenhardt, T. Evans,
S. Fajardo-Acosta, J. Fowler, C. Gelino, C. Grillmair, M. Harbut, D. Hoffman, T. Jarrett, J. D. Kirkpatrick, D. Leisawitz,
W. Liu, A. Mainzer, K. Marsh, F. Masci, H. McCallon, D. Padgett, M. E. Ressler, D. Royer, M. F. Skrutskie, S. A.
Stanford, P. L. Wyatt, D. Tholen, C.-W. Tsai, S. Wachter, S. L. Wheelock, L. Yan, R. Alles, R. Beck, T. Grav, J. Masiero,
B. McCollum, P. McGehee, M. Papin, M. Wittman, Explanatory Supplement to the WISE All-Sky Data Release Products,
http://wise2.ipac.caltech.edu/docs/release/allsky/expsup/, 2012.
J. R. Taylor, Rejection of Data, in: An Introduction of Error Analysis, chap. 6, University Science Books, 165 -- 172, 1997.
B. Peirce, Criterion for the Rejection of Doubtful Observations, Astronomical Journal 2 (1852) 161 -- 163.
B. A. Gould, On Peirce's Criterion for the Rejection of Doubtful Observations, with Tables for Facilitating its Application,
Astronomical Journal 4 (1855) 81 -- 87.
S. M. Ross, Peirce's Criterion for the Elimination of Suspect Experimental Data, Journal of Engineering Technology 20 (2003)
38 -- 41.
A. S. Rivkin, E. Howell, J. P. Emery, J. Sunshine, Evidence for OH or H2O on the Surface of 433 Eros and 1036 Ganymed,
Icarus 304 (2017) 74 -- 82.
M. Mueller, F. Marchis, J. P. Emery, A. W. Harris, S. Mottola, D. Hestroffer, J. Berthier, M. di Martino, Eclipsing binary
Trojan asteroid Patroclus: Thermal inertia from Spitzer observations, Icarus 205 (2010) 505.
29
|
0907.3471 | 3 | 0907 | 2009-07-22T11:24:10 | Mass measurement of a single unseen star and planetary detection efficiency for OGLE 2007-BLG-050 | [
"astro-ph.EP",
"astro-ph.SR"
] | We analyze OGLE-2007-BLG-050, a high magnification microlensing event (A ~ 432) whose peak occurred on 2 May, 2007, with pronounced finite-source and parallax effects. We compute planet detection efficiencies for this event in order to determine its sensitivity to the presence of planets around the lens star. Both finite-source and parallax effects permit a measurement of the angular Einstein radius \theta_E = 0.48 +/- 0.01 mas and the parallax \pi_E = 0.12 +/- 0.03, leading to an estimate of the lens mass M = 0.50 +/- 0.14 M_Sun and its distance to the observer D_L = 5.5 +/- 0.4 kpc. This is only the second determination of a reasonably precise (<30%) mass estimate for an isolated unseen object, using any method. This allows us to calculate the planetary detection efficiency in physical units (r_\perp, m_p), where r_\perp is the projected planet-star separation and m_p is the planet mass. When computing planet detection efficiency, we did not find any planetary signature and our detection efficiency results reveal significant sensitivity to Neptune-mass planets, and to a lesser extent Earth-mass planets in some configurations. Indeed, Jupiter and Neptune-mass planets are excluded with a high confidence for a large projected separation range between the planet and the lens star, respectively [0.6 - 10] and [1.4 - 4] AU, and Earth-mass planets are excluded with a 10% confidence in the lensing zone, i.e. [1.8 - 3.1] AU. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph |
Astronomy&Astrophysicsmanuscript no. OB050x
October 22, 2018
c(cid:13) ESO 2018
Mass measurement of a single unseen star
and planetary detection efficiency for
OGLE 2007-BLG-050
V. Batista1,51, Subo Dong2,52, A. Gould2,52, J.P. Beaulieu1,51, A. Cassan3,51, G.W. Christie25,52, C. Han30,52, A.
Udalski24,53
W. Allen28, D. L. DePoy2, A. Gal-Yam29, B. S. Gaudi2, B. Johnson32, S. Kaspi43, C. U. Lee35, D. Maoz43,
J. McCormick33, I. McGreer31, B. Monard28, T. Natusch50, E. Ofek34, B.-G. Park35, R. W. Pogge2, D. Polishook43,
and
A. Shporer43
(The µFUN Collaboration),
M.D. Albrow5, D. P. Bennett4,54, S. Brillant6, M. Bode7, D.M. Bramich8, M. Burgdorf49,50, J.A.R. Caldwell9, H.
Calitz10, A. Cole13, K. H. Cook11, Ch. Coutures12, S. Dieters1,13, M. Dominik14⋆, D. Dominis Prester15,
J. Donatowicz16, P. Fouqu´e17, J. Greenhill13, M. Hoffman10, K. Horne14, U.G. Jørgensen18, N. Kains14,
S. Kane19,D. Kubas1,6, J.B. Marquette1, R. Martin20, P. Meintjes10, J. Menzies21, K.R. Pollard5, K.C. Sahu22,
C. Snodgrass6, I. Steele7, Y. Tsapras23, J. Wambsganss3, A. Williams20, M. Zub3
Ł. Wyrzykowski24,27, M. Kubiak24, M. K. Szyma´nski24, G. Pietrzy´nski24,26, I. Soszy´nski24, O. Szewczyk26,24, K.
(The PLANET/RoboNet Collaboration),
Ulaczyk24
(The OGLE Collaboration),
F. Abe36, I. A. Bond37, A. Fukui36, K. Furusawa36, J. B. Hearnshaw5, S. Holderness38, Y. Itow36, K. Kamiya36, P. M.
Kilmartin40, A. Korpela40, W. Lin37,C. H. Ling37, K. Masuda36, Y. Matsubara36, N. Miyake36, Y. Muraki41, M.
Nagaya36, K. Ohnishi42, T. Okumura36, Y. C. Perrott46, N. Rattenbury46, To. Saito44, T. Sako36, L. Skuljan37, D.
Sullivan39, T. Sumi36, W. L. Sweatman37, P. J. Tristram40, P. C. M. Yock46
(The MOA Collaboration)
(Affiliations can be found after the references)
Submitted
ABSTRACT
Aims. We analyze OGLE-2007-BLG-050, a high magnification microlensing event (A ∼ 432) whose peak occurred on 2 May, 2007, with
pronounced finite-source and parallax effects. We compute planet detection efficiencies for this event in order to determine its sensitivity to the
presence of planets around the lens star.
Methods. Both finite-source and parallax effects permit a measurement of the angular Einstein radius θE = 0.48 ± 0.01 mas and the parallax
πE = 0.12 ± 0.03, leading to an estimate of the lens mass M = 0.50 ± 0.14 M
and its distance to the observer DL = 5.5 ± 0.4 kpc. This is only
⊙
the second determination of a reasonably precise (< 30%) mass estimate for an isolated unseen object, using any method. This allows us to
calculate the planetary detection efficiency in physical units (r
⊥, mp), where r
is the projected planet-star separation and mp is the planet mass.
⊥
Results.When computing planet detection efficiency, we did not find any planetary signature and our detection efficiency results reveal signif-
icant sensitivity to Neptune-mass planets, and to a lesser extent Earth-mass planets in some configurations. Indeed, Jupiter and Neptune-mass
planets are excluded with a high confidence for a large projected separation range between the planet and the lens star, respectively [0.6 - 10]
and [1.4 - 4] AU, and Earth-mass planets are excluded with a 10% confidence in the lensing zone, i.e. [1.8 - 3.1] AU.
Key words. extrasolar planets - gravitational microlensing
2
V. Batista et al.: OGLE-2007-BLG-050 : Planetary detection efficiency
1. Introduction
Over the last decade, microlensing events have been intensively followed in order to detect extrasolar planets around lens stars
and to measure their abundance in our Galaxy. This is one of the few planet-detection techniques that is sensitive to very low
mass planets, and microlensing discoveries have twice the record for the lowest mass planet to orbit a star other than a stellar
remnant (Beaulieu et al. 2006; Bennett et al. 2008). During a microlensing event, i.e. when a background source passes close to
the line of sight to a foreground lens star, the observed source flux is magnified by the gravitational field of the lens. The presence
of a companion around the lens star introduces two kinds of caustics into the magnification pattern : one or two "planetary
caustics" associated with the planet and a "central caustic" close to the primary lens projected on the source plane. When the
source crosses or approaches one of these features, deviations appear from a single point-lens light curve (Mao & Paczy´nski
1991; Gould & Loeb 1992).
1.1. Centralcausticanddetectionefficiency
Significant effort has been expended on the observation and modeling of high magnification events because they probe the central
caustic (Griest & Safizadeh 1998; Rhie et al. 2000; Rattenbury et al. 2002). Any planets in the system are highly likely to affect
the central caustic, resulting in potentially high sensitivity to the presence of even low-mass planets.
Indeed, a major advantage of the central caustic is that it is possible to predict in advance when the source passes close to
the line of sight of the lens and so when there is the greatest chance of detecting planets. Thus observations can be intensified,
further improving the sensitivity to planetary-induced anomalies in the lightcurve.
In these specific cases, for which the impact parameter can be very small, finite-source effects might strongly affect and
diminish a possible planetary signal (e.g., Dong et al. 2009b, Bennett et Rhie 1996). In the absence of any deviation from a
finite-source single point-lens model, one can still compute the planet detection efficiency in order to derive upper limits on the
probability that the lens harbors a planet (Gaudi & Sackett 2000). It also allows to combine statistically the detection efficiencies
computed from observed events to estimate the frequency of planetary companions to the lens (Gaudi et al. 2002).
The extremely high magnification microlensing event OGLE-2007-BLG-050 was well followed and is a good candidate for
analyzing the sensitivity of such an event with pronounced finite-source effects to the presence of a planetary companion. In this
study, we compute the planetary detection efficiency for this event, following the Gaudi & Sackett (2000) method. To perform
the calculations of binary light curves, we use the binary-lens finite-source algorithm developed by Dong et al. (2006) and the
formalism of Yoo et al. (2004a) for the single-lens finite-source effects.
1.2. Massanddistanceestimatesofthelensstar
OGLE-2007-BLE-050 is also one of the rare events that can potentially be completely solved by measuring both the microlens
Einstein angular radius θE and the microlens parallax πE. Indeed, after the first microlenses were detected (Alcock et al. 1993;
Udalski et al. 1993), several authors showed that the microlens Einstein angular radius θE,
could be measured from deviations relative to the standard point-lens (Paczy´nski 1986) lightcurve, due to finite-source effects
(Gould et al. 1994; Nemiroff & Wickramasinghe 1994; Witt & Mao 1994). The measured parameter associated with these effects
in units of θE. The measurement of θE constrains the physical properties
is ρ∗
of the lens and so leads to the first part of a full solution for an event (Gould 2000),
, corresponding to the angular size of the source θ∗
θE =
θ∗
ρ∗
θE = pκMπrel,
4G
c2AU ≈ 8 mas M−1
⊙
,
κ ≡
where M is the lens mass and πrel is the lens-source relative parallax. For most events, the only measured parameter that depends
on the mass M is the Einstein timescale, tE, which is a degenerate combination of the lens mass M, the lens-source relative
parallax πrel and the proper motion µrel. It can be expressed as :
Gould (1992) showed that if one measures both θE and the microlens parallax, πE, which is derived from the distortion of the
microlens light curve induced by the accelerated motion of the Earth, one can determine
tE =
θE
µrel
⋆ Royal Society University Research Fellow
πE = r πrel
κM
,
V. Batista et al.: OGLE-2007-BLG-050 : Planetary detection efficiency
3
and so determine the lens mass and lens-source relative parallax as well,
M =
θE
κπE
;
πrel = πEθE.
After thousands of single-lens microlensing events discovered to date, measurements of both θE and πE still remain a chal-
lenge. The microlens parallax πE has been measured for more than twenty single lenses (Alcock et al. 1995 [the first parallax
measurement], Poindexter et al. 2005 and references therein), while the angular Einstein radius θE has been measured for only
few cases of single lenses (Alcock et al. 1997, 2001 ; Smith et al. 2003b ; Yoo et al. 2004a ; Jiang et al. 2004 ; Cassan et al. 2006
; Gould et al. 2009).
However, reliable mass estimates for isolated stars have been determined with microlensing only twice. Alcock et al. (2001)
and Gould et al. (2009) each measured both θE and πE respectively for MACHO LMC-5 and OGLE 2007-BLG-224. For MACHO
LMC-5, good measurements of πrel and µrel were obtained with the original photometric data and additional high resolution
photometry of the lens (HST observations). Only for OGLE 2007-BLG-224 has there been a reliable mass estimate derived using
only ground-based photometric data.
All other good microlens stellar mass measurements to date have been obtained for binary (or planetary) lens events : EROS
BLG-2000-5 (An et al. 2002), OGLE 2006-BLG-109 (Gaudi et al. 2008), OGLE 2007-BLG-071 (Dong et al. 2009a), OGLE
2003-BLG-267 (Jaroszynski et al. 2005), OGLE 2002-BLG-069 (Kubas et al. 2005) and OGLE 2003-BLG-235 (Bond et al.
2004).
1.3. Detectionefficiencyinphysicalunits
Here, we present ground based photometric data of the event OGLE 2007-BLG-050 which we use, for the first time, to constrain
both the presence of planets and the mass of the lens.
This is also the first event for which parallax and xallarap (source orbital motion) are analyzed simultaneously. However, we
find that the apparent xallarap signal is probably due to minor remaining systematic effects in the photometry.
Access to the physical properties of the lens allows us to compute the planetary detection efficiency in physical units (r
is the projected separation in AU between the planet and the lens and mp is the planet mass in Earth mass units.
⊥, mp),
OGLE-2007-BLG-050 had a high sensitivity to planetary companions of the lens, with a substantial efficiency to Neptune-
where r
⊥
mass planets and even Earth-mass planets.
2. Observational data
The microlensing event OGLE-2007-BLG-050 was identified by the OGLE III Early Warning System (EWS ; Udalski 2003)
(α = 17h58m19.39s, δ = −28o38′59′′ (J2000.0) and l = +1.67o, b = −2.25o) on 2 Mar 2007, from observations carried
out with the 1.3 m Warsaw Telescope at the Las Campanas Observatory (Chile). The peak of the event occured on HJD′ ≡
HJD − 2, 450, 000 = 4221.904 (2007 May 2 at 9:36 UT).
The event was monitored over the peak by the Microlensing FollowUp Network (µFUN ; Yoo et al. 2004a) from Chile (1.3m
SMARTS telescope at the Cerro Tololo InterAmerican Observatory), South Africa (0.35 m telescope at Bronberg observatory),
Arizona (2.4 m telescope at MDM observatory, 1.0 m telescope at the Mt Lemmon Observatory), New Zealand (0.40 m and
0.35 m telescopes at Auckland Observatory and Farm Cove observatory respectively) and on the wings from the Vintage Lane
(Marlborough, New Zealand), Wise (Mitzpe Ramon, Israel) and Palomar 60-in (Mt Palomar California, USA) observatories.
However, the last three were not included in the final analysis because they do not significantly improve the constraints on
planetary companions. Data from all the three sites are consistent with single-lens model.
It was also monitored by Microlensing Observations in Astrophysics (MOA) with the 1.8 MOA-II telescope at Mt John
University Observatory (New Zealand), and Probing Lensing Anomalies Network (PLANET ; Albrow et al. 1998) from 5 differ-
ent telescopes : the Danish 1.54 m at ESO La Silla (Chile), the Canopus 1 m at Hobart (Tasmania), the Elizabeth 1 m at the South
African Astronomical Observatory (SAAO) at Sutherland, the Rockefeller 1.5 m of the Boyden Observatory at Bloemfontein
(South Africa) and the 60 cm of Perth Observatory (Australia). The RoboNet collaboration also followed the event with their
three 2m robotic telescopes : the Faulkes Telescopes North (FTN) and South (FTS) in Hawaii and Australia (Siding Springs
Observatory) respectively, and the Liverpool Telescope (LT) on La Palma (Canary Islands).
In this analysis, we use 601 OGLE data points in I band, 104 µFUN data points in I band, 77 µFUN data points close to R
band, 121 PLANET data points in I band, 55 RoboNet data points in R band and 239 MOA-Red data points (wide band covering
R and I bands).
3. Event modelling
OGLE-2007-BLG-050 is a very high magnification event (A ≃ 432) due to its small impact parameter u0. Because they are quite
obvious on the observed light curve, finite-source effects must be incorporated in the modeling. Moreover, the long timescale of
the event implies that parallax effects are likely to be detectable.
4
V. Batista et al.: OGLE-2007-BLG-050 : Planetary detection efficiency
3.1. Finite-sourceeffects
When observing a microlensing event, the resulting flux for each observatory-filter i can be expressed as,
Fi(t) = Fs,iA[u(t)] + Fb,i,
where Fs,i is the flux of the unmagnified source, Fb,i is the background flux and u(t) is the source-lens projected separation in the
lens plane.
When the source can be approximated as a point, the magnification of a single-lens event is given by (Einstein 1936;
Paczy´nski 1986)
u2 + 2
u √u2 + 4
) and the variation in brightness of the source star across
However, in our case the source cannot be considered as a point (u . ρ∗
its disk must be considered using the formalism of Yoo et al. (2004a). When limb-darkening of the source profile are neglected
(uniform source), the magnification can be expressed as (Gould 1994a; Witt & Mao 1994; Yoo et al. 2004a),
A(u) =
Auni(u/ρ∗
) ≃ A(u)B0(u/ρ∗
),
B0(z) ≡
4
π
zE(k, z)
where E is the elliptic integral of the second kind and k = min(z−1, 1). Separating the u and z = u/ρ∗
computation of extended-source effects.
parameters allows fast
To include the limb-darkening, we parameterize the source brightness S by,
S (θ)
S 0
= 1 − Γ"1 −
3
2
(1 − cos θ)#,
where θ is the angle between the normal to the stellar surface and the line of sight. The new magnification is then expressed by
adding the B1(z) function of Yoo et al. (2004a) related to the linear limb-darkening law,
Ald(u/ρ∗
) = A(u)[B0(z) − ΓB1(z)].
The limb-darkening coefficients Γ have been taken equal to 0.49 for the I filter and 0.60 for the R filter, which are results from a
single-lens fit. From Claret (2000) and Afonso et al. (2000) models, considering a subgiant similar to our source (log g = 4, T =
5250K), we find 0.44 and 0.53, respectively for I and R filters. These values are close to those of our model and lead to essentially
the same parameter values as shown in TABLE 1.
In Fig.1, we present the OGLE-2007-BLG-050 light curve modeled with extended-source effects (black curve) and without
these effects (red curve). Finite-source effects are clearly noticeable by a characteristic flattening and broadening of the light
curve at the peak.
For each data set, the errors were rescaled to make χ2 per degree of freedom for the best-fit extended-source point-lens
(ESPL) model close to unity. We then eliminated the largest outlier and repeated the process until there were no 3 σ outliers.
None of the outliers constitute systematic deviations that could be potentially due to planets.
3.2. Sourcepropertiesfromcolor-magnitudediagramandmeasurementof θE
To determine the dereddened color and magnitude of the microlensed source, we put the best fit color and magnitude of the
source on an (I, V − I). calibrated color magnitude diagram (CMD) (cf. Fig.2). We use calibrated OGLE-III data. The magnitude
and color of the target are I = 18.21 ± 0.03 and (V − I) = 2.32 ± 0.01. The mean position of the red clump is represented by an
open circle at (I, V − I)RC = (15.95, 2.37), with an error of 0.05 for both quantities. The shift in position of our target relative to
the red clump is then ∆I = 2.26 ± 0.05 and ∆(V − I) = −0.05 ± 0.05.
For the absolute clump magnitude, we adopt the Hipparcos clump magnitude MI,RC = −0.23 ± 0.03 (Stanek & Garvanich
(1998)). The mean Hipparcos clump color of (V−I)0,RC = 1.05±0.05 is adopted (Jennifer Johnson, 2008, private communication).
Assuming that the source is situated in the bulge and a Galactic center distance of 8kpc, µGC = 14.52 ± 0.10 (Einsenhauer et al.
2005).
The magnitude of the clump is given by I0,RC = MI,RC + µGC = 14.29 ± 0.10. We derive (I, V − I)0,RC = (14.29, 1.05) ±
(0.10, 0.05). Hence, the dereddened source color and magnitude are given by : (I, V − I)0 = ∆(I, V − I) + (I, V − I)0,RC =
(16.55, 1.00)± (0.12, 0.08).
From (V − I)0, we derive (V − K)0 using the Bessel & Brett (1988) diagram for giants, supergiants and dwarfs : (V − K)0 =
2.31 ± 0.13. The measured values of I0 and (V − I)0 then lead to K0 = 15.24 ± 0.09.
For completeness, we also derive an extinction estimate [AI, E(V − I)] = (1.66, 1.32), which leads to an estimate RVI =
AV /E(V − I) = 2.02.
V. Batista et al.: OGLE-2007-BLG-050 : Planetary detection efficiency
5
OGLE-2007-BLG-050
OGLE
Auckland
Farm Cove
MDM
Bronberg
CTIO
Mt Lemmon
MOA
SAAO
UTas
Danish
Perth
Boyden
FTN
FTS
Liverpool
Palomar
Wise
VLO
4215
4220
4225
4230
4221.8
4222
4222.2
4221.8
4222
4222.2
11
12
13
14
15
16
11.4
11.6
11.8
12
12.2
12.4
-0.02
0
0.02
Fig. 1. Top: Light curve of OGLE-2007-BLG-050 near its peak on 2007 May 1. Middle: Zoom onto the peak showing the finite-
source effects. Bottom : Magnitude residuals. They correspond to the real residuals and are not exactly equal to the difference
between data and model of the light curve shown above, because the model is given in I band and the R band data points have
been linearly converted into the I OGLE system. We show the model with finite source and parallax effects. As a comparison, a
model without finite source effects is shown in red.
The color determines the relation between dereddened source flux and angular source radius. We use the following expression
given by Kervella et al. (2004) for giants between A0 and K0 :
log 2θ∗ = 0.5170 − 0.2K0 + 0.0755(V − K)0,
giving θ∗ = 2.20 ± 0.06 µas.
angular Einstein radius θE : θE = θ∗/ρ∗ = 0.48 ± 0.01 mas, where the error is determined by : (σθE /θE)2 = (σθ∗
This first fit takes into account finite source effects only. The values of ρ∗
effects (see parallax effects later) but the induced modifications will be included in the final results.
With the angular size of the source given by the extended source point lens (ESPL) fit, ρ∗ = 0.00458± 0.00003, we derive the
)2.
and θE will not change significantly when adding new
/ρ∗
/θ∗
)2 + (σρ∗
Then, combined with the fitted timescale of the event tE = 66.9 ± 0.6 days, gives the geocentric relative lens-source proper
motion : µ = θE/tE = 2.63 ± 0.08 mas/yr, with the same method for calculating the error.
6
V. Batista et al.: OGLE-2007-BLG-050 : Planetary detection efficiency
15
16
17
18
19
I
20
1
1.5
2
(V−I)
2.5
3
Fig. 2. Calibrated color-magnitude diagram of the field around OGLE-2007-BLG-050. The clump centroid is shown by an empty
open circle, while the OGLE-III I and V − I measurements of the source are shown by an open circle surrounding 1 σ error bars.
3.3. Parallaxeffects
3.3.1. Orbital parallax effects
The source-lens projected separation in the lens plane, u(t) of Eq.3.1, can be expressed as a combination of two components, τ(t)
and β(t), its projections along the direction of lens-source motion and perpendicular to it, respectively :
If the motion of the source, lens and observer can all considered rectilinear, the two components of u(t) are given by,
u(t) = qτ2(t) + β2(t).
τ(t) =
t − t0
tE
;
β(t) = u0.
In the case of a simple point-source point-lens model, only five parameters are fitted : the source flux Fs, the blending flux Fb
(both duplicated if more than one observatory), the time of the closest approach t0, the impact parameter u0 and the timescale of
the event tE.
However, for long events, like OGLE-2007-BLG-050 (where tE ≥ yr/2π), the motion of the Earth cannot be approximated
as rectilinear and generates asymmetries in the light curve. Parallax effects then have to be taken into account. To introduce these
effects, we use the geocentric formalism (An et al. 2002 and Gould 2004) which ensures that the three standard microlensing
parameters (t0, tE, u0) are nearly the same as for the no-parallax fit. Now two more parameters are fitted. These are the two
components of the parallax vector, πE, whose magnitude gives the projected Einstein radius, rE = AU/πE and whose direction is
that of lens-source relative motion.
The parallax effects imply additional terms in the Eq.3.3.1
where
τ(t) =
t − t0
tE
+ δτ(t)
;
β(t) = u0 + δβ(t)
(δτ(t), δβ(t)) = πE∆s = (πE.∆s, πE × ∆s)
V. Batista et al.: OGLE-2007-BLG-050 : Planetary detection efficiency
7
0.4
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.4
0.4
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.4
Fig. 3. Likelihood contours as a function of the parallax vector πE (1, 2, 3, 4 σ). The best fit is πE = (0.099, −0.072). There is a
hard 3 σ lower limit πE > 0.086 which implies M < 0.67M
⊙
and a 3 σ upper limit πE < 0.23 which implies M > 0.25M
⊙
.
and ∆s is the apparent position of the Sun relative to what it would have been assuming a rectilinear motion of the Earth.
The Extended-Source Point-Lens (ESPL) fit yields a determination of the components (πE,N , πE,E) of the parallax vector πE
projected on the sky in North and East celestial coordinates. This is done by mapping a grid over the πE plane and searching for
the minimum of χ2 (cf. Fig.3). In addition to the best ESPL fit presented in Section 3.4, this grid search was done to probe the
likelihood contours as a function of πE, holding each trial parameter pair πE = (πE,N , πE,E) fixed while allowing all remaining
parameters to vary. The best fit is πE = (0.099, −0.072). There is a hard 3 σ lower limit πE > 0.086 and a 3 σ upper limit
πE < 0.23. The error of πE is calculated from the 1 σ contour : πE = 0.12 ± 0.03. The likelihood contours in the πE plane
are slightly elongated along the North-South axis. This tendency, which is weak here due to the long timescale, is explained in
Gould et al. (1994) by the fact that for short events the Earth's acceleration vector is nearly constant during the event.
The Fig.4 shows the modeling improvement when we include the orbital parallax effects in the fit. These plots only show the
OGLE and MOA residuals because these data mostly constrain the parallax since they cover a long time range.
As discussed by Smith et al. (2003a), there is a u0 ↔ −u0 degeneracy. For a low magnification event with u0 ∼ 1, the u0 > 0
and u0 < 0 solutions will behave differently, but for a high magnification event with u0 ≪ 1 like OGLE-2007-BLG-050, the
u0 ↔ −u0 transformation can be considered as a symmetry and there is no possibility to distinguish one solution from orbital
motion alone. In principle, these can be distinguished from so-called "terrestrial parallax" effects caused by the different positions
of the telescopes on the surface of the Earth.
3.3.2. Terrestrial parallax effects
We investigate terrestrial parallax in order to check if it is consistent with the vector parallax determined from orbital parallax
effects and to distinguish the u0 > 0 and u0 < 0 solutions. The resulting χ2 of the orbital+terrestrial parallax model does not
show any improvement and is actually worse than orbital parallax alone (∆χ2 = 4, χ2
orbital parallax = 1760.5). The most likely
explanation for this discrepancy is that the much stronger (∆χ2 = 235, χ2
without parallax = 1995.4) signal from orbital effects reflects
the true parallax and the small terrestrial parallax "signal" is actually just due to low-level systematic errors.
3.3.3. Xallarap effects
We also consider the possibility that the orbital parallax signal is actually due to xallarap (orbital motion of the source) rather
than to real parallax. Of course an orbital motion of the source, in case of a binary orbit that fortuitously mimics that of the Earth,
8
V. Batista et al.: OGLE-2007-BLG-050 : Planetary detection efficiency
Fig. 4. OGLE (stars) and MOA (hexagons) residuals (magnitude) for models with (upper panel) and without (lower panel)
parallax effects. The residuals have been binned for clarity.
can reproduce the same light curve as the orbital parallax effects but here we are looking for orbital motion that is inconsistent
with the Earth-motion explanation.
We therefore search for xallarap solutions (orbital motion of the source) by introducing 5 new parameters in the model related
to the orbital motion of the source : P the period of the source's orbit, ξE,N and ξE,E the xallarap vector which is analogous to the
πE vector, and α2 and δ2, the phase and inclination of the binary orbit which function as analogs of the celestial coordinates of
the source in case of parallax. The rather long timescale does not justify removing parallax effects to search for xallarap only and
moreover, searching for a model including only xallarap effects does not provide significant improvements. For these reasons,
we search for a solution that takes into account both orbital + terrestrial parallax and xallarap effects with a Markov Chain Monte
Carlo algorithm (MCMC). We explore a large range of periods, from 0 to 700 days, and find a χ2 improvement (χ2 = 1717.7,
∆χ2 = −43) for periods above 250 days in comparison with the orbital parallax effects only. The χ2 is essentially flat in the period
range [250 - 500] days with a very shallow minimum around P = 290 days.
The P = 290 days solution gives : ξE = (0.958, −0.273), and thus a source orbital radius : as = DS θE ξE = 3.74 AU.
Kepler's third law (expressed in solar-system units),
and Newton's third law,
imply
a3 = P2M ; M ≡ Ms + Mc
Ms as = Mc ac ⇒ a ≡ ac + as = 1 +
Ms
Mc!as
M3
M3
c
a3
s = P2M ⇒
a3
s
P2
=
Mc
[1 + (Ms/Mc)]2 .
From the position of the source relative to the red clump on the CMD diagram (Fig.2), we conclude that the source is a sub-giant
situated in the bulge and, because the bulge is an old population, we infer that the source mass Ms is close to a solar mass with
an upper limit of 1.2M
, thus a black hole,
⊙
which has an extremely low a priori probability. And if the companion is neither a black hole nor a neutron star, its mass has to
be less or equal than the source mass since the source is an evolved star and a slightly heavier companion would therefore be
much brighter. To explore these other possible star companions, we add a new constraint on the magnitude of the xallarap vector
. This mass limit and the long orbital period require a companion with Mc > 70M
⊙
V. Batista et al.: OGLE-2007-BLG-050 : Planetary detection efficiency
9
1760
1750
1740
1730
1720
100
150
200
250
300
Fig. 5. χ2 as a function of the period of the source'orbit from a MCMC algorithm with parallax and xallarap effects. The dashed
line is the case without any constraint on the companion mass and leads to a black hole solution. The solid line is for a constraint
(ξE < 0.31/3
3.7 P2/3 = 0.18(P/yr)2/3) and leads to a solar mass companion with a minimum of χ2 at P = 170 days.
in the MCMC program, assuming that Ms < 1.2M
⊙
and Mc/Ms ≤ 1, which can be expressed as :
ξE <
0.31/3
3.7
P2/3 = 0.18(P/yr)2/3.
The minimum of χ2 (χ2 = 1730) is obtained for a source orbital period equal to 170 days as shown in the Fig.5. When we put
the corresponding parameters (P, α2, δ2) in a differential-method program to reach a more accurate solution, we find χ2 = 1728.1.
The xallarap vector of this solution (ξE,N, ξE,E )=(−0.0142, 0.0940) implies a source orbital radius as = DS θE ξE = 0.40AU
and a companion mass close to 1M
, πE,N,
⊙
πE,E, ξE,N, ξE,E, P, α2, δ2). We plot the 1σ and 3σ limits of the πE = πE as given in the Fig.6. The resulting parallax is then
πE = 0.94 ± 0.10.
. The MCMC algorithm permits us to explore an 11-dimensional space (t0, tE, u0, ρ∗
3.4. Characteristicsoftheextended-sourcemodelswithparallaxandxallarapeffects
Considering the finite-source effects and parallax + xallarap effects, and the 16 observatories involved in the event monitoring, we
have to fit 43 parameters (the 3 standard parameters, 1 for the angular size of the source, 2 for parallax, 5 for xallarap and 2x16 for
the fluxes Fs and Fb of the different telescopes). The best ESPL fit model including parallax and xallarap effects (χ2 = 1717.7)
corresponds to a binary system in which the source companion is a black hole (see §.3.3.3). One more reasonable solution could
be the solar mass companion obtained when using a constraint on the xallarap (see §.3.3.3). This solution has χ2 = 1728.1 for
1745 data points and 43 fit parameters, to give χ2/d.o. f = 1.01, while the best ESPL fit with parallax effects only has χ2 = 1760.5
and the one without any parallax nor xallarap effects gives χ2 = 1995.4, a difference of ∆χ2 = 267.3. The corresponding best-fit
parameters and their errors as determined from the light curve of three different models are shown in Table 1 and Table 2 (see
also Fig.1).
10
V. Batista et al.: OGLE-2007-BLG-050 : Planetary detection efficiency
10
8
6
4
2
0
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Fig. 6. χ2 as a function of the magnitude of the parallax vector πE from MCMC runs including the constraint ξE <
(0.31/3/3.7)P2/3 = 0.18(P/yr)2/3 on the companion mass. πE = 0.94 ± 0.10.
TABLE 1
OGLE-2007-BLG-050 Fit Parameters
Extended-Source Point-Lens with Parallax
Parameters
χ2
t0 (days)
σt0 (days)
u0
σu0
tE (days)
σtE (days)
ρ∗
σρ∗
πE
σπE
ξE
σξE
Without
xallarap
1760.5
4221.9726
0.0001
0.00204
0.00002
68.09
0.66
0.00450
0.00004
0.12
0.03
/
/
Xallarap
Black hole
P = 290 days
1717.7
Xallarap
Solar mass
P = 170 days
1728.1
4221.9725
0.0001
0.00215
0.00003
64.96
0.75
0.00473
0.00006
2.33
0.07
1.00
0.06
4221.9725
0.0001
0.00214
0.00003
65.11
0.75
0.00471
0.00006
0.94
0.10
0.17
0.07
Table 1. Fit parameters for three different models : 1/ with orbital parallax effects only, 2/ with orbital parallax + xallarap
(black-hole source companion), 3/ with orbital parallax + xallarap (solar-mass source companion).
V. Batista et al.: OGLE-2007-BLG-050 : Planetary detection efficiency
11
TABLE 2
OGLE-2007-BLG-050 Flux Parameters
Extended-Source Point-Lens
Orbital Parallax + Xallarap (solar mass companion)
Observatory
Fs
σFs
Fb
σFb
OGLE I
MOA I
µFUN R New-Zealand (Auckland)
µFUN R New-Zealand (Farm Cove)
µFUN I Arizona (MDM)
µFUN R South Africa (Bronberg)
µFUN I Chile (CTIO SMARTS)
µFUN I Arizona (Mt Lemmon)
PLANET I South Africa (SAAO)
PLANET I Australia, Tasmania (UTas)
PLANET I Chile (Danish)
PLANET I Australia (Perth)
PLANET I South Africa (Boyden)
Robonet R Faulkes North (Hawaii)
Robonet R Faulkes South (Australia)
Robonet R Liverpool (Canaries Island)
0.96
0.96
1.08
0.91
0.99
0.232
6.24
3.94
5.60
2.74
14.45
0.793
9.59
0.115
0.129
2.75
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.009
0.17
0.002
0.06
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.15
0.008
0.09
0.001
0.001
0.03
0.28
0.29
3.06
-27.0
242.3
0.28
-3.9
21.8
-1.9
163.8
13.0
6.5
447.3
-0.26
-0.229
17.7
0.01
0.01
0.05
0.2
75.0
0.04
0.2
0.1
1.6
1.2
0.4
0.1
0.6
0.02
0.009
0.3
Table 2. Source flux and blending for telescopes that observed OGLE 07-BLG-050. The given values corresponds to the model
with parallax and xallarap, in a case of a solar mass companion for the source. They do not change significantly for the other
models.
3.5. Lensmassanddistanceestimates
Gould (1992) showed that if both θE and πE could be measured, then the mass M and the lens-source relative parallax πrel could
be determined as given in Eq.1.2 and then the lens distance could be deduced from :
πrel = 1AU 1
DL −
1
DS !
The resulting characteristics of the lens are given in Table 3 for each model that we have presented : parallax only, parallax +
xallarap (black-hole companion) and parallax + xallarap (solar-mass companion). Due to the high parallax magnitude obtained
with the "black hole" model (see Table 1), the lens mass is a brown dwarf (M = 0.025M
) in the extreme foreground (DL =
⊙
824pc). Moreover, the extreme black hole mass (Ms > 70M
), by itself, virtually rules out this model. We take this as evidence
⊙
for unrecognized systematic errors at the ∆χ2 ∼ 40 level, and hence do not believe inferences based on ∆χ2 at this level are
robust. Systematic errors at this level are not uncommon for microlensing events.
The model with a solar-mass companion is suspect as well, still with a brown-dwarf lens in the foreground, meaning that it
results from the same systematics. We therefore conclude that the xallarap "signal" is probably spurious and we present these
two models only for completeness. We expect that the presence of these systematics will corrupt the parallax measurements by
of order q∆χ2
xallarap+parallax/∆χ2
parallax ∼ √(235 ± 43/235) − 1 ∼ 9%, which will impact the lens mass and relative parallax
estimates. However, this systematic error is too small to qualitatively impact the conclusions of this paper.
For the model with parallax effects only, the lens star is a M-dwarf (Table 3) and situated in the disk, lying 5.5 kpc from the
observer. With the added uncertainties due to systematics, the parallax becomes πE = 0.12 ± 0.03 ± 0.01, the lens mass estimates
M = 0.50 ± 0.14 M
( 28%) and the relative parallax πrel = 57.9 ± 14.5µas. For the rest of the analysis, we will only consider this
⊙
model when the physical parameters of the lens are needed.
As discussed by Ghosh et al. (2004), future high-resolution astrometry could allow the direct measurement of the magnitude
and direction of the lens-source relative proper motion µ and substantially reduce the parallax uncertainty and thus the stellar
mass uncertainty. But according to our initial estimate of the relative proper motion (µ = 2.63 ± 0.08 mas/yr), it would take at
least a 20 years to clearly detect the lens (especially since the source is very bright), but hopefully, within a decade, either ELT,
GMT or TMT (giant telescopes) will be built, in which case the lens could be observed thereafter.
4. Planet Detection efficiency
4.1. Introductionandpreviousanalyses
To provide reliable abundance limits of Jupiter- to Earth-mass planets in our Galaxy, it is essential to evaluate the apparent
non-planetary events, especially the well-covered high magnification events. A necessary step is to evaluate the confidence with
which one can exclude potential planetary companions for each event.
12
V. Batista et al.: OGLE-2007-BLG-050 : Planetary detection efficiency
TABLE 3
OGLE-2007-BLG-050 Lens mass and distance
Extended-Source Point-Lens with Parallax
Parameters
Without
xallarap
Xallarap
Black hole
P = 290 days
Xallarap
Solar mass
P = 170 days
θE
M (M
)
⊙
πrel (µas)
DL (kpc)
0.48 ± 0.01
0.50 ± 0.13
58 ± 15
5.47 ± 0.45
0.47 ± 0.041
0.025 ± 0.001
1088 ± 46
0.82 ± 0.07
0.47 ± 0.01
0.0618 ± 0.0007
440 ± 58
1.77 ± 0.20
Table 3. Lens mass and distance for three different models : 1/ with orbital parallax effects only, 2/ with orbital parallax +
xallarap (black-hole source companion), 3/ with orbital parallax + xallarap (solar-mass source companion).
Since OGLE-2007-BLG-050 presents strong finite-source effects, one may wonder whether a given planetary perturbation
would have been so washed out by these effects as to become undetectable. Using many such efficiency calculations the aim is
to determine the selection function to the underlying population of planets.
Gaudi & Sackett (2000) developed the first method to calculate detection efficiency for a single planet, which was extended
to multiple planets detection efficiency by Gaudi et al. (2002), who analyzed 43 microlensing events from the 1995-1999 obser-
vational seasons. Three of them were high magnification events [OGLE-1998-BLG-15 (Amax ∼ 170), MACHO-1998-BLG-35
(Amax ∼ 100) and OGLE-1999-BLG-35 (Amax ∼ 125)]. This 5-year analysis provided the first significant upper abundance limit
of Jupiter- and Saturn-mass planets around M-dwarfs. Tsapras et al. (2003) and Snodgrass et al. (2004) derived constraints on
Jovian planet abundance based on OGLE survey data of 1998-2000 and 2002 seasons respectively.
Computing detection efficiency for individual events is thus required to estimate the frequency of planetary signatures in
microlensing light curves, and a couple of complex events have indeed been analyzed separately. For example the high mag-
nification event OGLE-2003-BLG-423 (Amax ∼ 256) by Yoo et al. (2004b) who found that the event was not as sensitive as it
should have been if better monitored over the peak. Another high magnification (Amax ∼ 525) example is MOA-2003-BLG-32 /
OGLE-2003-BLG-219 was analyzed by Abe et al. (2004) and Dong et al. (2006) (Appendix B). This well-covered event showed
the best sensitivity to low-mass planets to date. Finally, the highest magnification event ever analyzed, OGLE-2004-BLG-343,
was unfortunately poorly monitored over its peak, and Dong et al. (2006) showed that it otherwise would have been extremely
sensitive to low-mass planets.
4.2. PlanetdetectionefficiencyinEinsteinUnits
To characterize the planetary detection efficiency of OGLE-2007-BLG-050, we follow the Gaudi & Sackett (2000) method which
consists of fitting binary models with the 3 binary parameters (d, q, α) held fixed and the single lens parameters allowed to vary.
Here d is the planet-star separation in units of θE, q the planet-lens mass ratio, and α the angle of the source trajectory relative
to the binary axis. In Gaudi & Sackett (2000), the single lens parameters, u0, t0 and tE, are related to a PSPL fit. In this analysis,
we also fit the radius of the source ρ∗
(scaled to the Einstein radius) and compare the binary lens fits to the best ESPL fit for this
event.
From the resulting fitted binary lens χ2
C. If ∆χ2
(d,q,α) is
compared with a threshold value χ2
(d,q,α) >
χ2
C, it is excluded. Gaudi et al. (2002) argued that a threshold of 60 is high enough to be confident in excluding binary lens
systems.
ES PL, and ∆χ2
C, the (d, q, α) planetary (or binary) system is detected, while if ∆χ2
(d,q,α), we calculate the χ2 improvement : ∆χ2
(d,q,α) < −χ2
(d,q,α) = χ2
(d,q,α) − χ2
For each (d, q), the fraction of angles 0 < α < 2π that was excluded is called the "sensitivity" for that system. Indeed, the
detection efficiency ǫ(d, q) can be expressed as :
ǫ(d, q) =
1
2π Z 2π
0
Θ(∆χ2(d, q, α) − χ2
C)dα
where θ is the step function. To perform the calculations of binary light curves, we use a binary-lens finite-source algorithm
developed by Dong et al. (2006) (Appendix A). The resulting grids of χ2 as a function of d and α are shown in Fig.7 for some
values of q. The complete computation has been done for every possible combinations between the following values of d, q and
α :
-- q : 19 values with a constant logarithmic step over the range [10−6, 10−2].
-- d : 40 values with a constant logarithmic step over the range [0.1, 10].
V. Batista et al.: OGLE-2007-BLG-050 : Planetary detection efficiency
13
-- α : 121 values linearly spaced from 0 to 360o.
The resulting detection efficiency diagram for OGLE-2007-BLG-050 is shown in Fig.8. The first observation is that no
planet is detected since there is no configuration that gives ∆χ2 < −60. This event is very sensitive to the presence of planets,
especially in the [0.8 - 1.2] separation range in Einstein units, where the detection efficiency reaches 100% for Jupiter mass ratios
(q = 9x10−4), 75% for Neptune mass ratios (q = 5x10−5) and 10% for Earth mass ratios (3x10−6). In larger separation ranges, as
[0.4 - 2.7] RE, we exclude Jupiter mass ratios with 95% confidence.
In future statistical analyses of microlensing planetary detection efficiency, one will likely be forced to use a higher exclusion
threshold than 60 because, while planets can sometimes be reliably excluded at this threshold (as in the present case), it is
unlikely that they can be reliably detected at this level, particularly in high-magnification events. Because we cannot predict the
exact threshold that will be adopted by future studies, we show both our exclusion level (∆χ2 > 60) and a somewhat arbitrarily
chosen value, ∆χ2 > 250. The important point is that the detection efficiency diagrams in the two cases (Fig.8 and with a threshold
equal to 250 in Fig.9) are very similar.
4.3. Planetdetectionefficiencyinphysicalunits
Having an estimate of the angular Einstein radius θE, the distance DL of the lens from the observer and the lens mass M, we
derive estimates of the physical parameters (r
is the projected separation between
the planet and its host star and mp the planet mass, and calculate the associated detection efficiency.
⊥, mp) for the tested planetary models, where r
⊥
(AU) = d DL (kpc) θE (mas)
r
⊥
mp = qM
To simplify the translation between efficiency diagrams in Einstein units and physical units, we have considered the values
of M, DL and θE as perfectly known. A proper analysis would involve a convolution of the detection efficiency map in terms of
native parameters d, q over the probability density distribution of the primary lens parameters (e.g. Yoo et al. (2004b)). While
our procedure of keeping M, DL and θE fixed is an approximation, considering the logarithmic scale of the efficiency maps, the
uncertainties in the primary lens parameters will not have an important effect on the shape of the resulting efficiency diagrams.
We take the parameters related to the fit with extended source and parallax effects, where M = 0.50 ± 0.14 M
⊙
, DL =
5.47 ± 0.45 kpc and θE = 0.48 ± 0.01 mas. The resulting detection efficiency diagram in physical units is shown in Fig.8 as well,
but the corresponding axes are those on the top and the right of the graphic. This demonstrates that OGLE-2007-BLG-050 is
sensitive to Neptune-mass planets as well as some Earth-mass configurations. Indeed, for a [1.8 - 3.1] AU projected separation
range between the planet and the lens star, Jupiter, Neptune and Earth-like planets are excluded with a 100%, 95% and 10%
confidence respectively. For a range of [1.4 - 4] AU, the detection efficiency reaches 100% for Jupiter mass planets and 75% for
Neptune mass planets, and for a much bigger range of [0.6 - 10] AU, Jupiter-like planets are excluded with a 75% confidence.
4.4. Planetdetectionefficiencyasafunctionofcentralcausticsize
Chung et al. (2005) analyzed the properties of central caustics in planetary microlensing events in order to estimate the pertur-
bation that they induce. They gave an expression for the central-caustic size as a function of the planet-star separation and the
planet/star mass ratio. Several authors have considered the size and shape of the central caustic as a function of the parameters
of the planet for high-magnification events (Griest & Safizadeh 1998; Dominik 1999; Dong et al. 2009b). In the analysis of the
cool Jovian-mass planet MOA-2007-BLG-400Lb, Dong et al. (2009b) conducted the initial parameter space search over a grid
of (w,q) rather than (d,q) where w is the "width" of the central caustic. For MOA-2007-BLG-400, the angular size of the central
caustic is smaller than that of the source (w/ρ ∼ 0.4), and w can be directly estimated by inspecting the light curve features.
Dong et al. (2009b) find the (w,q) parametrization is more regularly defined and more efficient in searching parameter space than
(d,q).
The source size of OGLE-2007-BLG-050 is ρ = 0.0045 which is relatively big, and since finite-source effects smear out
the sharp magnification pattern produced by the central caustics, one way to present the planetary detection efficiency results
is to estimate the ratio w/ρ that is reached at the detection/exclusion limits. Assuming that detectable planets should produce
signals ≥ 5%, Han & Kim (2009) estimated the ratio w/ρ must be at least equal to 0.25. Here we present the detection efficiency
diagram in (d,w/ρ) space in Fig.10, still considering ∆χ2 > 60 as the criterion of exclusion. This diagram shows a clear frontier
in red at w/ρ values between 0.1 and 0.3 above which the detection efficiency is greater than 50%, which also corresponds to
the 50% detection's contours in Fig.8. On this frontier, the value of w/ρ goes down to 0.1 for d ∼ 1 and increases to 0.3 for
d >> 1 or d << 1. Our realistic estimate of detection efficiency is in general agreement with the simple criterion in Han & Kim
(2009). Given the high photometric precision and dense sampling, our data allow detections below the 5% threshold adopted
by Han & Kim (2009). We also note that the w/ρ threshold is weakly dependant on d, which is a result of the enhancement in
detection efficiency of the resonant caustics at small mass ratios.
14
V. Batista et al.: OGLE-2007-BLG-050 : Planetary detection efficiency
We have presented a new way of visualizing the detection efficiency in (d,w/ρ) space. It offers a physically straightforward
way to understand the planetary sensitivity in events with pronounced finite-source effects. We find that the data obtained by
current observation campaigns can probe planetary central caustics as small as ∼ 20% of the source size for high-magnification
events.
5. Conclusion
OGLE-2007-BLG-050 is a rare case of a high magnification event with well measured finite source effects and detectable parallax
effects. This leads to an estimate of the angular Einstein radius θE = 0.48 ± 0.01 mas, the parallax πE = 0.12 ± 0.03, the mass
M = 0.50 ± 0.14 M
and distance DL = 5.5 ± 0.4 kpc of the lens star. This is only the second reasonably precise mass estimate
⊙
(to within 28%) for an unseen single object using any method.
When computing planet detection efficiency, we did not find any planetary signature and the resulting maps in (d, q, α), where
d is the planet-star separation in Einstein units, q the planet-lens mass ratio, and α the angle of the source trajectory relative to the
binary axis, reveal a good sensitivity to low mass ratios q, with a 75% and 10% efficiencies for Neptune- and Earth-mass ratios
respectively in the range [0.8 - 1.2] RE, and a 100% detection efficiency for Jupiter-mass ratio in [0.4 - 2.7] RE.
It also permits the calculation of efficiency maps in physical space (r
is the projected planet/star separation
and mp is the planet mass. Here we show that this microlensing event is very sensitive to Neptune-mass planets and has (10%)
sensitivity to Earth-mass planets within a [1.8 - 3.1] AU projected separation range.
⊥, mp), where r
⊥
Acknowledgements. We thank Thomas Prado and Arnaud Tribolet for their careful reading of the manuscript. VB thanks Ohio State
University for its hospitality during a six week visit, during which this study was initiated. We acknowledge the following support:
Grants HOLMES ANR-06-BLAN-0416 Dave Warren for the Mt Canopus Observatory; NSF AST-0757888 (AG,SD); NASA NNG04GL51G
(DD,AG,RP); Polish MNiSW N20303032/4275 (AU); HST-GO-11311 (KS); NSF AST-0206189 and AST-0708890, NASA NAF5-13042
and NNX07AL71G (DPB); Korea Science and Engineering Foundation grant 2009-008561 (CH); Korea Research Foundation grant 2006-311-
C00072 (B-GP); Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute (KASI); Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CSB); PPARC/STFC, EU FP6 pro-
gramme "ANGLES" (ŁW,NJR); PPARC/STFC (RoboNet); Dill Faulkes Educational Trust (Faulkes Telescope North); Grants JSPS18253002,
JSPS20340052 and JSPS19340058 (MOA); Marsden Fund of NZ(IAB, PCMY); Foundation for Research Science and Technology of NZ;
Creative Research Initiative program (2009-008561) (CH); Grants MEXT19015005 and JSPS18749004 (TS). This work was supported in part
by an allocation of computing time from the Ohio Supercomputer Center.
V. Batista et al.: OGLE-2007-BLG-050 : Planetary detection efficiency
15
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-6
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-6
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-6
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-6
-4
-2
-4
-2
-4
-2
-4
-2
0
x
0
x
0
x
0
x
2
4
6
2
4
6
2
4
6
2
4
6
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-6
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-6
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-6
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-6
-4
-2
-4
-2
-4
-2
-4
-2
0
x
0
x
0
x
0
x
2
4
6
2
4
6
2
4
6
2
4
6
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-6
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-6
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-6
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-6
-4
-2
-4
-2
-4
-2
-4
-2
0
x
0
x
0
x
0
x
2
4
6
2
4
6
2
4
6
2
4
6
Fig. 7. Binary-lens finite-source grids of χ2 as a function of (x, y) where x = d cos α and y = d sin α for different values of q. The
value appearing in the upper part of each diagram corresponds to the value of log q. The color scale shows the variations of the
16
V. Batista et al.: OGLE-2007-BLG-050 : Planetary detection efficiency
Fig. 8. Resulting detection efficiency diagram for d and q ranges of [0.1 − 10]RE and [10−6 − 10−2]Mlens and detection efficiency
diagram in physical units (r
⊥, mp) if considering the upper and right axes. The contours indicate 25%, 50%, 75% and 90%
efficiency, with an excluding threshold equal to 60.
Fig. 9. Same as Fig.8, except with a hypothetical threshold of ∆χ2 = 250. Comparison with Fig.8 shows that planet sensitivity
does not depend strongly on threshold.
V. Batista et al.: OGLE-2007-BLG-050 : Planetary detection efficiency
17
1
0.1
0.01
0.1
1
10
Fig. 10. Resulting detection efficiency diagram in (d,w/ρ) space. This diagram shows a clear frontier in red at w/ρ values between
0.1 and 0.3 above which the detection efficiency is greater than 50%. This frontier corresponds to the 50% detection's contours
in the Fig.8.
18
References
V. Batista et al.: OGLE-2007-BLG-050 : Planetary detection efficiency
Abe, F. et al. 2004, Science, 305, 1264
Afonso, C. et al. 2000, ApJ, 532, 340
Albrow, M. et al. 1998, ApJ, 509, 687
Albrow, M. et al. 2001, ApJ, 549, 759
Alcock, M.D. et al. 1993, Nature, 365, 621
Alcock, C. et al. 1995, ApJ, 454, L125
Alcock, C. et al. 1997, ApJ, 486, 697
Alcock, C. et al. 2001, Nature, 414, 617
An, J.H. et al. 2002, ApJ, 572, 521
Beaulieu, J.P. et al. 2006, Nature, 439, 437
Bennett, D.P. & Rhie, S.H. 1996, ApJ, 472, 660
Bennett, D.P. et al. 2002, ApJ, 579, 639
Bennett, D.P. et al. 2008, ApJ, 684, 663
Bessel, M.S., & Brett, J.M. 1988, Astron. Pac. Soc., 100, 1134
Bond, I.A. 2001, MNRAS, 327, 868
Bond, I.A. et al. 2004, ApJ, 606, 155
Cassan, A. et al. 2006, A&A, 460, 277
Cassan, A. et al. 2008, A&A, 4414, L1
Chung, S.J., et al. 2005, ApJ, 630, 535
Claret, A. 2000, A&A, 363, 1081
Dominik, M. 1999, A&A, 349, 108
Dong, S., et al. 2006, ApJ, 642, 842
Dong, S., et al. 2009a, ApJ, 695, 970
Dong, S., et al. 2009b, ApJ, 698, 1826
Drake, A.J., Cook, K.H., & Keller, S.C. 2004, ApJ, 607, 29
Einsenhauer, F., et al. 2005, ApJ, 628, 246
Einstein, A. 1936, Science, 84, 506
Gaudi, B.S., & Sackett, P.D. 2000, ApJ, 566, 463
Gaudi, B.S., et al. 2002, ApJ, 566, 463
Gaudi, B.S., et al. 2008, Science, 319, 927
Ghosh, H., et al. 2004, ApJ, 615, 450
Gould, A. 1992, ApJ, 392, 442
Gould, A., & Loeb,A. 1992, ApJ, 396, 104
Gould, A., Miralda-Escud´e, J. & Bahcall, J.N. 1994, ApJ, 423, L105
Gould, A. 1994a, ApJ, 421, 71
Gould, A. 2000, ApJ, 542, 785
Gould, A. 2004, ApJ, 606, 319
Gould, A. et al. 2009, ApJsubmitted, arXiv:0904.0249
Gould, A., Bennett, D.P., & Alves, D.R. 2004, ApJ, 614, 404
Griest, K., & Safizadeh, N. 1998, ApJ, 500, 37
Han, C., & Kim, D. 2009, ApJ, 693,1835
Jiang, G. et al. 2004, ApJ, 617, 1307
Jaroszynski, M. et al. 2005, Acta Astronomica, 55, 159
Kervella, P., et al. 2004, A&A, 426, 297
Kubas, D. et al. 2005, A&A, 435, 941
Mao, S., & Paczy´nski, B. 1991, ApJ, 374, 37
Mao, S. 1999, A&A, 350, L19
Mao, S. et al. 2002, MNRAS, 329, 349
Nemiroff, R.J., & Wickramasinghe, W.A.D.T. 1994, ApJ, 424, L21
Paczy´nski, B. 1986, ApJ, 304, 1
Poindexter, S., Afonso, C., Bennett, D.P., Glicenstein, J.F., Gould, A., Szyma´nski, M. & Udalski, A. 2005, ApJ, 633, 914
Rattenbury, N., et al. 2002, MNRAS, 335, 159
Rhie, S.H., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 378
Soszy´nski, I., et al. 2001, ApJ, 552, 731
Smith, M., Mao, S., & Paczy´nski, B. 2003, MNRAS, 339, 925
Smith, M., Mao, S., & Wo´zniak, P. 2002, MNRAS, 332, 962
V. Batista et al.: OGLE-2007-BLG-050 : Planetary detection efficiency
19
Smith, M., Mao, S., & Wo´zniak, P. 2003, ApJ, 585, L65
Snodgrass, C. et al. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 967
Staneck, K.Z., & Garvanich, P.M. 1998, AAS, 30, 1409
Tsapras, Y. et al. 2003, MNRAS, 343, 1131
Udalski, A., et al. 1993, Acta Astron., 43, 289
Udalski, A. 2003, Acta Astron., 53, 291
Witt, H., & Mao, S. 1994, ApJ, 430, 505
Yoo, J., et al. 2004, ApJ, 603, 139
Yoo, J., et al. 2004, ApJ, 616, 1204
1 Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, INSU-CNRS, 98 bis Boulevard Arago, F-75014 Paris, France ; batista, beaulieu and [email protected].
2 Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University, 140 W. 18th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA ; dong, gould and [email protected]
state.edu.
3 Astronomisches Rechen-Institut, Zentrum fur Astronomie, Heidelberg University, Monchhofstr. 12 -- 14, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
4 University of Notre Dame, Department of Physics, 225 Nieuwland Science Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA ; [email protected].
5 University of Canterbury, Department of Physics & Astronomy, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand
6 European Southern Observatory, Casilla 19001, Vitacura 19, Santiago, Chile
7 Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Twelve Quays House, Egerton Wharf, Birkenhead CH41 1LD, UK
8 Isaac Newton Group, Apartado de Correos 321, E-38700 Santa Cruz de La Palma, Spain
9 McDonald Observatory, 16120 St Hwy Spur 78, Fort Davis, TX 79734, USA
10 Dept. of Physics / Boyden Observatory, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa
11 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, IGPP, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA 94551, USA
12 DSM/DAPNIA, CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France
13 University of Tasmania, School of Maths and Physics, Private bag 37, GPO Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia
14 SUPA, University of St Andrews, School of Physics & Astronomy, North Haugh, St Andrews, KY16 9SS, United Kingdom
15 Physics department, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
16 Technical University of Vienna, Dept. of Computing, Wiedner Hauptstrasse 10, Vienna, Austria
17 Observatoire Midi-Pyr´en´ees, UMR 5572, 14, avenue Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France
18 Niels Bohr Institute, Astronomical Observatory, Juliane Maries Vej 30, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
19 NASA Exoplanet Science Institute, Caltech, MS 100-22, 770 South Wilson Avenue Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
20 Perth Observatory, Walnut Road, Bickley, Perth 6076, Australia
21 South African Astronomical Observatory, P.O. Box 9 Observatory 7935, South Africa
22 Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
23 Astronomy Unit, School of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK
24 Warsaw University Observatory, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warszawa, Poland; udalski, mj, msz, mk, pietrzyn, soszynsk, ku-
[email protected].
25 Auckland Observatory, Auckland, New Zealand; [email protected].
26 Universidad de Concepci´on, Departamento de Fisica, Casilla 160 -- C, Concepci´on, Chile; [email protected].
27 Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK; [email protected].
28 Bronberg Observatory, Centre for Backyard Astrophysics Pretoria, South Africa; [email protected].
29 Benoziyo Center for Astrophysics, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100 Rehovot, Israel; [email protected].
30 Program of Brain Korea, Department of Physics, Chungbuk National University, 410 Seongbong-Rho, Hungduk-Gu, Chongju 371-763,
Korea; [email protected].
31 Department of Astronomy, Columbia University, Pupin Physics Laboratories, New York, NY 10027; [email protected].
32 Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge University, Madingley Rd., Cambridge, CB 0HA, UK; [email protected].
33 Farm Cove Observatory, Centre for Backyard Astrophysics, Pakuranga, Auckland New Zealand; [email protected].
34 Division of Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125; [email protected].
35 Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, 61-1 Hwaam-Dong, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon 305-348, Korea; [email protected].
36 Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory, Nagoya University, Nagoya, 464-8601, Japan.
37 Institute for Information and Mathematical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 102-904, Auckland 1330, New Zealand.
38 Computer Science Department, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
39 School of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand.
40 Mt. John Observatory, P.O. Box 56, Lake Tekapo 8770, New Zealand.
41 Department of Physics, Konan University, Nishiokamoto 8-9-1, Kobe 658-8501, Japan.
42 Nagano National College of Technology, Nagano 381-8550, Japan.
43 Wise Observatory, Tel Aviv University, 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel; dani, shai, david and [email protected].
44 Tokyo Metropolitan College of Industrial Technology, Tokyo 116-8523, Japan.
45 Department of Physics and Astrophysics, Faculty of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan.
46 Department of Physics, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92-019, Auckland 1001, New Zealand.
47 Alvine Estate, 456D Vintage Lane, RD3, NZ Blenheim 7321.
48 Deutsches SOFIA Institut, Universitat Stuttgart, Pkaffenwaldring 31, 70569 Stuttgart.
49 SOFIA Science Center, Mail stop N211-3, Moffett Field CA 94035, USA.
20
V. Batista et al.: OGLE-2007-BLG-050 : Planetary detection efficiency
50 AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand; [email protected].
51 Probing Lensing Anomalies NETwork (PLANET).
52 Microlensing Follow Up Network (µFUN).
53 Optical Gravitational Lens Experiment (OGLE).
54 Microlensing Observations in Astrophysics (MOA).
|
1807.10621 | 1 | 1807 | 2018-07-27T13:48:48 | The atmosphere of WASP-17b: Optical high-resolution transmission spectroscopy | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | High-resolution transmission spectroscopy is a method for understanding the chemical and physical properties of upper exoplanetary atmospheres. Due to large absorption cross-sections, resonance lines of atomic sodium D-lines (at 5889.95 $\AA$ and 5895.92 $\AA$) produce large transmission signals. Our aim is to unveil the physical properties of WASP-17b through an accurate measurement of the sodium absorption in the transmission spectrum. We analyze 37 high-resolution spectra observed during a single transit of WASP-17b with the MIKE instrument on the 6.5 meter Magellan Telescopes. We exclude stellar flaring activity during the observations by analyzing the temporal variations of H$_{\alpha}$ and Ca II infra-red triplet (IRT) lines. Then we obtain the excess absorption light curves in wavelength bands of 0.75, 1, 1.5 and 3 $\AA$ around the center of each sodium line (i.e., the light curve approach). We model the effects of differential limb-darkening, and the changing planetary radial velocity on the light curves. We also analyze the sodium absorption directly in the transmission spectrum, which is obtained through dividing in-transit by out-of-transit spectra (i.e., the division approach). We then compare our measurements with a radiative transfer atmospheric model. Our analysis results in a tentative detection of exoplanetary sodium: we measure the width and amplitude of the exoplanetary sodium feature to be $\sigma_{\mathrm{Na}}$ = (0.128 $\pm$ 0.078) $\AA$ and A$_{\mathrm{Na}}$ = (1.7 $\pm$ 0.9)% in the excess light curve approach and $\sigma_{\mathrm{Na}}$ = (0.850 $\pm$ 0.034) $\AA$ and A$_{\mathrm{Na}}$ = (1.3 $\pm$ 0.6)% in the division approach. By comparing our measurements with a simple atmospheric model, we retrieve an atmospheric temperature of 1550 $^{+170} _{-200}$ K and radius (at 0.1 bar) of 1.81 $\pm$ 0.02 R$_{\rm Jup}$ for WASP-17b. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. aa
July 30, 2018
c(cid:13)ESO 2018
The atmosphere of WASP-17b: Optical high-resolution
transmission spectroscopy
Sara Khalafinejad1, 3, 8, Michael Salz1, Patricio E. Cubillos2, George Zhou3, Carolina von Essen4, Tim-Oliver Husser5,
Daniel D.R. Bayliss6, Mercedes López-Morales3, Stefan Dreizler5, Jürgen H.M.M Schmitt1, and Theresa Lüftinger7
1 Hamburg Observatory, Hamburg University, Gojenbergsweg 112, 21029 Hamburg, Germany,
e-mail: [email protected]
2 Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Schmiedlstrasse 6, A-8042 Graz, Austria
3 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 01238, USA
4 Stellar Astrophysics Centre, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 120, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
5 Institute for Astrophysics, Göttingen University, Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
6 Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV47AL, UK
7 Institut für Astronomie, Universität Wien, Türkenschanzstrasse 17, 1180 Wien, Austria
8 Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Königstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
July 30, 2018
ABSTRACT
High-resolution transmission spectroscopy is a method for understanding the chemical and physical properties of upper exoplanetary
atmospheres. Due to large absorption cross-sections, resonance lines of atomic sodium D-lines (at 5889.95 Å and 5895.92 Å ) produce
large transmission signals. Our aim is to unveil the physical properties of WASP-17b through an accurate measurement of the sodium
absorption in the transmission spectrum. We analyze 37 high-resolution spectra observed during a single transit of WASP-17b with
the MIKE instrument on the 6.5 meter Magellan Telescopes. We exclude stellar flaring activity during the observations by analyzing
the temporal variations of Hα and Ca II infra-red triplet (IRT) lines. Then we obtain the excess absorption light curves in wavelength
bands of 0.75, 1, 1.5 and 3 Å around the center of each sodium line (i.e., the light curve approach). We model the effects of differential
limb-darkening, and the changing planetary radial velocity on the light curves. We also analyze the sodium absorption directly in the
transmission spectrum, which is obtained through dividing in-transit by out-of-transit spectra (i.e., the division approach). We then
compare our measurements with a radiative transfer atmospheric model. Our analysis results in a tentative detection of exoplanetary
sodium: we measure the width and amplitude of the exoplanetary sodium feature to be σNa = (0.128 ± 0.078) Å and ANa = (1.7 ±
0.9)% in the excess light curve approach and σNa = (0.850 ± 0.034) Å and ANa = (1.3 ± 0.6)% in the division approach. By comparing
our measurements with a simple atmospheric model, we retrieve an atmospheric temperature of 1550 +170−200 K and radius (at 0.1 bar) of
1.81 ± 0.02 RJup for WASP-17b.
Key words. PlanetarySystems -- Planets and satellites: atmospheres, composition, individual: WASP-17b -- Techniques: spectro-
scopic, high regular resolution -- Methods: observational - Stars: activity
1. Introduction
Transmission spectroscopy, pioneered by Charbonneau et al.
(2002), is a very successful observational method to unveil the
chemical and physical properties of hot-Jupiter atmospheres.
During an exoplanetary transit, a fraction of the stellar light
passes through the planet's atmosphere, hence a fraction of this
light is absorbed. As a result, the signatures of the chemical com-
position of the atmosphere are imprinted on the transmitted light
at certain wavelengths, making the radius of the exoplanet to ap-
pear larger at these wavelengths.
In the optical region the resonant doublets of sodium (Na),
and potassium (K), have large absorption cross sections, hence,
a larger absorption in the transmitted signal of these lines is ex-
pected (Seager & Sasselov 2000; Fortney et al. 2010). Thus,
these lines have been used as diagnosis of exoplanetary atmo-
spheres (e.g., Vidal-Madjar et al. 2011; Huitson et al. 2012; Sing
et al. 2012; Wyttenbach et al. 2017). In addition, at optical wave-
lengths it is possible to infer, for instance, water vapor (Allart
et al. 2017) and atmospheric hazes (Pont et al. 2008; Sing et al.
2016) and molecular features of TiO (e.g., Hoeijmakers et al.
2015; Sedaghati et al. 2017).
Different types of instruments unveil different aspects of
an exoplanetary atmosphere. For instance, using low-resolution
transmission spectroscopy, we can investigate hazes, clouds, Na,
and K, in the deeper layers of exoplanetary atmospheres. On
the other hand, by means of high-resolution transmission spec-
troscopy in narrow bands centered on Na doublets, we can ac-
cess the information on upper atmospheric layers and the layers
above the hazes and clouds (Kempton et al. 2014; Morley et al.
2015).
Exoplanetary transit spectral observations are influenced by
different effects, mostly of stellar origins. These can be flares,
spots, differential limb-darkening and rotation effects. A suc-
cessful detection of the exoplanet's atmosphere requires a proper
consideration of these effects. We already investigated sodium in
HD 189733b as a prototypical target: HD 189733A is a very ac-
tive K-type star. After correcting for stellar flaring activity and
Article number, page 1 of 13
8
1
0
2
l
u
J
7
2
.
]
P
E
h
p
-
o
r
t
s
a
[
1
v
1
2
6
0
1
.
7
0
8
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
A&A proofs: manuscript no. aa
stellar differential limb-darkening effects, we detected the signa-
tures of sodium in the exoplanet (Khalafinejad et al. 2017). Here,
we intend to apply a similar approach on transit observations of
WASP-17b, a hot Jupiter orbiting an inactive F-type star. Obtain-
ing a comparative view of different targets helps to better under-
stand the influence of stellar activity of different stellar types on
transmission spectroscopy.
In this study, we use the high-resolution spectral data of
Zhou & Bayliss (2012), who used a single transit observation
of WASP-17b and claimed the detection of sodium by obtaining
the excess light curve depth in passbands of 1.2 Å to 1.8 Å (with
steps of 0.1Å) around the center of sodium lines and measured
the depths by fitting a simple light curve model. We analyze the
sodium absorption in WASP-17b with a new approach, we in-
tend to improve and complete the previous analysis by Zhou &
Bayliss (2012): We rely on their extraction of the raw excess
light curve and go beyond the previous work, first by account-
ing for the stellar limb-darkening effect and changes in the ra-
dial velocity of the planet in the excess light curves. The second
consideration is that, in addition to the detection of sodium, we
constrain the physical characteristics of WASP-17b by modeling
the sodium transmission spectrum of the planet. Finally, we ad-
ditionally investigate the behavior of the Hα and Ca ii infra-red
triplet (IRT) lines during the transit to inspect the stellar activ-
ity and possibly the exoplanet's atmospheric hydrogen absorp-
tion from the upper atmosphere of this highly inflated (Anderson
et al. 2010) exoplanet.
The structure of this paper is as follows: In section 2, we
introduce the hot-Jupiter WASP-17b. Then in Section 3 we de-
scribe the observation, and the steps of data reduction. In Sec-
tion 4, we investigate the stellar activity through Hα and Ca ii
IRT. Section 5 focuses on detection of exoplanetary atmospheric
sodium using the excess light curves, and Section 6 presents the
method and results for extraction of the transmission spectrum
in the region of sodium lines. In Section 7 we discuss the re-
sults and compare the observations with an atmospheric model.
Finally in Section 8 we summarize our conclusions.
2. The system WASP-17
WASP-17b is an inflated hot-Jupiter, with a mass of 0.49 MJup, a
radius of 1.99 RJup and an orbital period of ∼3.7 days (Anderson
et al. 2010) and it is in a retrograde motion (Triaud et al. 2010;
Bayliss et al. 2010). Its host star is of spectral type F6V, with a
magnitude of V = 11.6 (Høg et al. 2000). The parameters of the
system used in this work are summarized in Table 2. WASP-17b
has a very low density, ∼ 0.06ρJup, and a high equilibrium tem-
perature, ∼1800 K (Anderson et al. 2011). Thus, it is expected
to have a very large atmospheric scale height. In consequence,
this hot Jupiter has become one of the few very well stud-
ied targets for atmospheric characterization with transmission
spectroscopy. For instance, Wood et al. (2011) used medium-
resolution (R ∼ 12 500) observations with the GIRAFFE fiber-
fed spectrograph at the VLT and reported a sodium detection
with an excess absorption of (1.46 ± 0.17)%, (0.55 ± 0.13)% and
(0.49± 0.09)% in passbands of 0.75 Å , 1.5 Å and 3 Å , respec-
tively. Zhou & Bayliss (2012) used the Magellan Inamori Ky-
ocera Echelle (MIKE) spectrograph (R ∼ 48 000) on the Mag-
ellan Telescopes for the same purpose. By applying the trans-
mission spectroscopy technique in narrow bands they detected
a (0.58 ± 0.13)% signal at the core of sodium D-lines (D2 at
5889.95 Å and D1 at 5895.92 Å) in a passband of 1.5 Å.
Article number, page 2 of 13
Later, low-resolution broad-band observations in the opti-
cal and IR region were performed. Bento et al. (2014) used
multi-color broad-band photometry with SDSS 'u','g','r' (cov-
ering wavelengths from 325 to 690 nm) and compared to the g-
band they found evidence for increased absorption in the r-filter
where the sodium feature is located. Using the Hubble Space
Telescope (HST) WFC3 instrument, Mandell et al. (2013) ana-
lyzed low-resolution transmission spectroscopy in the IR region
(1.1 -1.7 µm). Their analysis of the band-integrated time series
suggests water absorption and the presence of haze in the at-
mosphere of WASP-17b. Nortmann (2015) used FORS2 at the
VLT, and after dealing with instrumental systematics, derived
the optical transmission spectrum of WASP-17b in the region
between 800 and 1000 nm. Their transmission spectrum hints
at strong absorber in the bluer wavelength region. In addition,
based on their tested theoretical models, tentative signatures of
a TiO and VO or a potassium and water atmosphere have been
observed, but these models cannot fully explain their observa-
tions. Sing et al. (2016) used HST (STIS and WFC3) and Spitzer
observations, and obtained optical to mid-IR transmission spec-
trum (∼ 0.3µm - 5µm) of a sample of hot-Jupiters including
WASP-17b. In their measurements, the atmospheric absorption
in WASP-17b, at ∼5900 Å (wavelength of sodium) with the bin
size of 5 Å , is about (0.33± 0.18)%. Sedaghati et al. (2016) ana-
lyzed low-resolution (R ∼ 2000) transit observations of FORS2
and obtained the broad-band transmission spectrum of WASP-
17b with a bin size of 100 Å in the wavelength range of 5700 to
8000 Å, where they detected a cloud-free atmosphere and potas-
sium absorption with a 3σ confidence level. In their study the
sodium feature was not detected neither in 100 Å nor in 50 Å
bin size. Finally, Heng (2016)'s work also suggested a nearly
cloud-free atmosphere at visible wavelengths.
3. Observations and data reduction
On the night of 2010 May 11, one single transit of the hot
Jupiter, WASP-17b, was observed with the MIKE spectrograph,
mounted on the 6.5m Magellan II (Clay) Telescope. During the
observation 37 spectra, with an exposure time of 600 seconds
each were obtained. In addition, a slit widths of 0.35 arcsec was
chosen, resulting in a spectral resolution of R ∼ 48, 000 in the
wavelength range of 5000 to 9500 Å. The spectra have a pixel
scale of ∼ 0.04 Å and a resolution element of about 0.12 Å. In
the sodium doublet region, the S/N of our spectra is about 80
per pixel. Two of the spectra with poor signal-to-noise (S/N <
60) and high airmass were discarded. These correspond to the
first and last exposures. The details of the observations, along
with the initial data reduction of the echelle spectra, are fully
discussed by Bayliss et al. (2010).
3.1. Spectral data reduction in Na, Hα and Ca ii IRT
The spectra were analysed in wavelength bands with a width of a
few hundred Angstroms in three regions: Na (5800-6100 Å ), Hα
(6500-6700 Å ), and Ca ii IRT (8400-8700 Å ). Data preparation
before performing the main analysis mainly consists of spectral
normalization, spectral alignment and telluric line removal. The
data reduction in the Na doublet, Hα and Ca ii IRT regions fol-
lows a similar procedure. For the spectral normalization and re-
moval of telluric features in the Na region we rely on the data
reduction by Zhou & Bayliss (2012). Here, we accurately align
the spectra in the Na wavelength region, in addition we perform
a complete reduction around the Hα and Ca ii IRT lines.
Sara Khalafinejad et al.: The atmosphere of WASP-17b: Optical high-resolution transmission spectroscopy
Parameter
Mid-transit time
Orbital Period
Transit duration
Ingress/egress duration
Orbital inclination
Semi-major axis
Planet mass
Planet radius
Planet surface gravity
Stellar effective temperature
Stellar surface gravity
Metallicity
Stellar radius
Projected stellar rotation velocity
Planet to star area ratio
Symbol
T0 (HJDUTC)
P (days)
T14 (days)
T12 =T34 (days)
i (◦)
a (au)
Mp (MJup)
Rp (RJup)
log gP (cgs)
Teff (K)
log g (dex)
[Fe/H]
RS (R(cid:12))
vsin(i) (kms−1)
(RP/RS)2
Value
2454577.85806 ± 0.00027
3.7354380 ± 0.0000068
0.1830 ± 0.0017
0.0247 ± 0.0017
86.83 ± 0.62
0.05150 ± 0.00034
0.486 ± 0.032
1.991 ± 0.081
2.448 ± 0.042
6650 ± 80
4.161 ± 0.026
-0.19 ± 0.09
1.572 ± 0.056
10.05 ± 0.88
0.01696 ± 0.00026
Table 1. Adopted values for the orbital and physical parameters of WASP-17 used in the ecxess light curve approach in this work (5). For
consistency with Zhou & Bayliss (2012), all values are taken from Anderson et al. (2011)
.
We shift the spectra into the stellar rest frame. To correct the
misalignment between exposures, we select 8,7, and 14 stellar
spectral lines in the vicinity of the Na doublets, Hα, and Ca ii IRT
lines respectively and fit Gaussians to determine the line centers.
Each spectrum is shifted by the mean offset of the line centers
with reference to the first observation. The resulting misalign-
ments in each region are shown as radial-velocity (RV) shifts in
Fig. 1 (top). All regions show a similar pattern, with a maximum
difference of ∼1 km s−1 between exposures. We then correct cos-
mics via linear interpolation over the affected spectral ranges and
interpolate all spectra onto a common wavelength grid, increas-
ing the sampling by a factor of four to minimize interpolation
errors. 5th-order polynomials are used to normalize the contin-
uum.
The airmass value of each exposure is also shown in Fig-
ure 1 (bottom). Changes of airmass cause variations in the tel-
luric features (mainly water at these wavelengths) with a similar
trend. To remove the tellurics in the sodium region, the method
by Zhou & Bayliss (2012) is followed: The observations of the
rapidly rotating B star, HD 129116, are used as a template. For
each exposure, this telluric template is scaled to fit the prominent
telluric water lines and then the spectra are divided by the tem-
plate. As explained in Zhou & Bayliss (2012), no telluric sodium
is observed. The spectra of WASP-17 are affected by interstellar
sodium lines which has wavelength shifts of about 1 Å with re-
spect to the stellar lines.
The removal of the Earth's atmospheric features in the Hα
and Ca ii IRT regions is a bit different. Telluric lines are stronger
in the Hα range and we devise an approximate approach to re-
move them. A high resolution telluric transmission spectrum of
Moehler et al. (2014) for an airmass of 1.5 is fitted to the average
stellar spectrum. This fitting procedure has three free parameters:
The stellar radial velocity, the amplitude of the telluric lines, and
the width of a Gaussian with which the telluric spectrum is con-
volved to model the instrumental resolution. In a second step,
the observation run is split into five sections and for each of the
five mean spectra, we again fit the telluric spectrum by only ad-
justing the amplitude of the telluric lines. During the observation
night, this amplitude follows a trend that resembles the airmass
trend, and we fit a 2nd order polynomial to the amplitude evolu-
tion. Each spectrum is then divided by the shifted and convolved
telluric reference spectrum with the amplitude derived from the
Fig. 1. Top: Spectral misalignments in three regions around the Na dou-
blet, Hα and Ca II IRT line. Bottom: Airmass value for each exposure
(two of the exposures with airmass larger than 1.8 are not shown).
polynomial. Our visual inspection shows that, in the individual
spectra, strong telluric lines are effectively reduced at the 90%
level. Figure 2 shows the average spectrum of WASP-17 in the
Hα and Ca ii IRT regions with the telluric transmission spectrum
and the uncorrected spectrum for the Hα range. The telluric cor-
rection has little impact on the resulting Hα equivalent widths
(see Section 4.1).
4. Data analysis: stellar activity
Using high-resolution transit spectra, we have two possible ap-
proaches to detect the exoplanetary sodium embedded inside the
stellar spectrum: One is to integrate in narrow passbands inside
the stellar absorption lines (with a reference band in the contin-
uum) and investigate the additional contribution of the planetary
atmosphere to the obscuring of the stellar light during the tran-
sit (excess light curve approach). The other is to directly obtain
the exoplanetary transmission spectrum by dividing the in-transit
spectra by the out-of-transit spectra (division approach). But first
Article number, page 3 of 13
A&A proofs: manuscript no. aa
we identify possible signatures of stellar activity on the spectra.
In this section we investigate the stellar activity and then, in the
next sections, we perform the transmission spectroscopy both
through excess light curve and division approaches.
4.1. Investigations of stellar activity
Stellar spots (e.g., Oshagh et al. 2013; Czesla et al. 2009), plage
regions (e.g., Oshagh et al. 2014) and flaring activity (e.g., Klo-
cova et al. 2017), are among the main sources of false signals in
the interpretation of transmission spectra.
Small bumps or dips in the photometric transit light curves
and deformations of the high-resolution spectral line shapes
can be signatures of stellar variability. Investigations of spots
through study of spectral line deformations are easier for very
fast rotating stars (e.g., Wolter et al. 2005; Reiners 2012). In
this work, we do not have simultaneous photometric observa-
tions and the star is a slow rotator, hence study of stellar spots
is not possible. However we are still able to perform an in-depth
study of flaring events.
Currently, HD 189733 (Jensen et al. 2012; Cauley et al. 2017a)
and KELT-9b (Yan & Henning 2018) remain the systems with
possible Hα absorption caused by the planet's evaporating atmo-
sphere.
In the study of Klocova et al. (2017) a moderate flare on the
K-type host star HD 189733 affected the time evolution in all
studied spectral lines with a similar time behaviour. Khalafine-
jad et al. (2017) showed that the sodium lines were affected by
the same flare, but on a level about a factor of 10 weaker than the
Hα line. In WASP-17, the activity seen in the Hα region of 20 mÅ
could affect the Na region on a 2 mÅ level, if we assume a simi-
lar scaling as in HD 189733. This is about half of the level of the
observed absorption signal in the Na region (see below). How-
ever, the activity is higher during the transit and should not cause
an artificial absorption signal, but rather decrease the planetary
sodium signal. We do not observe a clear stellar flare and, thus,
do not attempt to correct the impact of stellar activity variations
in the sodium region, but we do note that the observed absorption
level may have been lowered by an increased in-transit activity
level of the host star.
Chromospheric lines such as Hα (at 6563 Å) and Ca ii IRT (at
8498, 8542, 8662 Å) are indicators of stellar activity (e.g., Cin-
cunegui et al. 2007; Martínez-Arnáiz et al. 2010; Chmielewski
2000; Andretta et al. 2005; Busà et al. 2007; Klocova et al.
2017), but also other stellar lines such as the sodium D-lines
can be affected by stellar activity (e.g., Cessateur et al. 2010).
Here, we estimate by how much a planetary signal in the sodium
D-lines can be affected by stellar activity.
Additionally, the Hα line may indicate signatures of hydro-
gen escape from the upper atmosphere of hot gas planets (Cauley
et al. 2016, 2017a). Due to its low mean density and a high irradi-
ation level, WASP-17 b is expected to host a strongly evaporating
atmosphere (Bourrier et al. 2015; Salz et al. 2016). Therefore, it
is reasonable to search for Hα absorption features around the
planetary transit.
We compute the equivalent width (EW) of the individual
"transmission" spectra in the Hα and all three Ca ii IRT lines
following Cauley et al. (2017a). Each spectrum is divided by the
total mean spectrum and then integrated over the central ±50
km s−1. The EW of the three IRT lines is then averaged. Errors
are derived from the variation in adjacent ±500 to 1000 km s−1
bands. This slightly underestimates the error in the line cores and
the impact of red-noise, therefore, we follow Czesla et al. (2017)
to derive a mean error for the EW curves and scale our values
accordingly.
The time evolution of the equivalent widths is shown in
Fig. 3. Both EWs evolve similarly: except for the planetary
egress, WASP-17 shows a slightly increased activity level dur-
ing the planetary transit compared to the out-of-transit level.
This is also seen in the average in-transit transmission spectrum
of the Hα and IRT regions (see Fig. A.1). At egress both EW
light curves show a dip, which can be caused by stellar variabil-
ity or by some absorption feature of planetary origin. However,
the signal-to-noise is not sufficient to investigate this any further.
The Hα EW of WASP-17 changes by about 20 mÅ over the tran-
sit duration, which is slightly stronger than that of HD 189733
(see Cauley et al. 2017a). The EW of a planetary Hα absorption
feature should be smaller than the observed activity variation,
which is equivalent to an absorption level 0.9% over the integra-
tion band. For the IRT we exlude 8 mÅ corresponding to 0.3%
absorption. WASP-17 is among several other systems with non-
detections of Hα in-transit absorption (HD 149026, HD 147506,
KELT-3 b, and GJ 436 b Jensen et al. 2012; Cauley et al. 2017b).
Article number, page 4 of 13
5. Analysis and results: Excess light curve
approach
5.1. Extraction and modeling of the excess light curve
The extraction of the raw excess light curves in the sodium dou-
blet region is performed by Zhou & Bayliss (2012), who use in-
tegration passbands of 0.75, 1, 1.5 and 3 Å centered on the core
of each sodium line and select the interstellar sodium next to D1
(Na line with the longer wavelength) as a reference in the flux
integration. For consistency with Zhou & Bayliss (2012), we use
the same integration and reference bands. During the transit the
radial velocity of the planet changes between −18 to +18 kms−1,
which results in a Doppler shift of up to ± 0.35 Å. Thus, with
a passband of 0.75 Å we can still be sure that the exoplanetary
feature is still located inside the integration band. Here we use
a different approach in measuring the exoplanetary signal in the
excess light curves. We make a combined model of differential
LD and changing RV models to fit the excess light curves; the de-
tailed explanations of these two model components are presented
by Khalafinejad et al. 2017. To increase the signal-to-noise we
use average of both sodium D-lines and do not treat the lines
individually.
There are some effects that inevitably influence transit spec-
tra or excess light curves. To accurately model the excess light
curves, we take the following effects into account and consider
each as a model component of the final model, which is intro-
duced in Section 5.1.4.
5.1.1. Differential Limb-darkening (component A)
Stellar limb-darkening depends on wavelength (e.g., Czesla et al.
2015). Thus dividing the flux in the integration band by the refer-
ence band, is similar to dividing two light curves with two differ-
ent limb-darkening coefficients by each other. Thus, this division
affects the shape of the excess light curve and needs to be cor-
rected for, specifically in late type stars where the effect is more
prominent. We calculate the limb-darkening coefficients in each
passband using the intensity profiles of the PHOENIX model
(Hauschildt & Baron 1999; Husser et al. 2013) and the quadratic
limb-darkening law (Kopal 1950). More details are explained by
Khalafinejad et al. (2017); the results are shown in Table 2. Since
Sara Khalafinejad et al.: The atmosphere of WASP-17b: Optical high-resolution transmission spectroscopy
Fig. 2. Average Hα and Ca ii IRT spectra (blue). Black lines show a telluric transmission spectrum used for the telluric correction in the Hα region.
The uncorrected spectrum is shown in gray in the Hα panel.
Fig. 3. Time evolution of the equivalent widths of the Hα line and the mean of the three Ca II IRT lines. The contact points of the transit are
indicated by vertical dashed green lines. The horizontal line shows the reference value of zero. Both lines show some activity evolution over the
night, but no stellar flares.
the excess light curves are already averaged out between D1 and
D2, we use the average of the coefficients. The signal-to-noise
of our data is not enough to consider LD coefficients as fitting
parameters, hence this model is considered to be constant and to
have no fitting parameters. We note that, changing this constant
model component by 50%, alters the final measured sodium ab-
sorption within the 1σ error-bar.
5.1.2. Planetary radial velocity (component B)
The exoplanetary spectral lines move inside the stellar lines due
to the Doppler shift caused by the exoplanetary orbital motion.
This results in an apparent reduction of the depth of excess light
curve at the mid-transit time (Khalafinejad et al. 2017; Albrecht
2008).
For considering the exoplanetary atmospheric absorption ef-
fect in this work, the exoplanetary sodium line is considered as a
Gaussian convolved inside the stellar sodium line. This Gaussian
moves inside the stellar sodium line with an offset proportional
to the change of the radial velocity of the exoplanet by the orbital
motion (see equation 8 in Khalafinejad et al. 2017). At the same
time, the moving Gaussian causes the dip in the light curve and
a bump near the mid-transit time. The fitting parameters of this
components are the width (Gaussian σNa) and the depth (Gaus-
sian ANa) of the exoplanetary Gaussian profile. Since our raw
Article number, page 5 of 13
1.3TimeevolutionFigure5:Weintegratetheresidualequivalentwidthover+/-50km/saroundthelinecoresofalllines.IntheIRTlineswederivethemeanofthethreevalues.Thetimeevoluationisshownhere.Thetransitcontactpointsaremarked.BoththeHαandIRTlinecoresshowclearevolutionoverthenight.Fig.6showsthattheevolutioniscorrelatedin-andout-of-transit,andthusmostlikelycausedbystellaractivity.Figure6:CorrelationoftheHαandIRTEW.5 A&A proofs: manuscript no. aa
λ-range (Å ) D2:
D1:
Average
u1,u2
5888.52-5889.27
5894.48-5895.23
0.75 Å core
0.3651 , 0.1447
5888.40-5889.40
5894.36-5895.36
1 Å core
0.3850, 0.1589
5888.15-5889.65
5894.11-5895.61
1.5 Å core
0.3965 , 0.1802
5887.40-5890.40
5893.36-5896.36
3 Å core
0.3979 , 0.2144
5895.50-5898.00
ref.
0.4009 , 0.2306
Table 2. Limb-darkening coefficients (u1,u2) for the average of sodium D2 and D1 integration bands (Core) and reference (Ref.) bands with the
specified wavelength ranges in the table below. Errors of the limb-darkening coefficients are in all cases on the order of 10−3-10−4.
excess light-curve is the average of both sodium D1 and D2, we
model the effect on both stellar sodium lines and then obtain the
averages of sigma and amplitude of the Gaussian feature.
5.1.3. Neglected Effects
According to Triaud et al. (2010) and Bayliss et al. (2010),
WASP-17 has a large spin-orbit misalignment angle (∼ 150◦),
and the Rossiter-McLaughlin (RM) effect does not produce a
symmetric RV curve. Therefore, the variations in line shape dur-
ing the transit do not completely cancel out. Based on Figure 6
in Anderson et al. (2010), the difference between the amplitude
of the curve in the blue- and red-shifted parts of the star is about
100 ms−1, which results in a 0.002 Å change of a spectral line
position. This value is at least one order of magnitude smaller
than what we expect for the width of the exoplanetary sodium
feature. Thus we ignore the RM effect in this analysis. We note
that we evaluate the influence of the RM effect on measurements
of the line centers in the alignment of spectra in Section 6.1.
However, the maximum radial velocity caused by the RM effect
is smaller than the precision of the alignment, thus no evidence
of influence of this effect could be detected.
In addition, as mentioned in Section 4.1, we cannot take into
account the effects of possible spots and plages in this data set.
In any case, as also confirmed through our investigation of the
activity indicating lines, we do not expect pronounced activity
features on this F-type star.
5.1.4. Final model
A combination of the LD and the RV models constitutes the
main model, we also consider a normalization constant (offset)
as the third model component (C) and consider the model, M, as
a function of time, t:
M(t) = LD(t) × RV(t) + o f f set
≡ A × B + C
(1)
The fitting parameters in the model, in Eq. 1, are the σNa,
ANa and the offset. For exploring the best-fit parameters and their
associated uncertainties we apply a Markov Chain Monte Carlo
(MCMC) analysis, using the affine invariant ensemble sampler
emcee (Foreman-Mackey et al. 2013). We employ 20 walkers,
with 100 chains each, where the initial positions are synthesized
from a Gaussian distribution around our best estimates. All the
free parameters have uniform priors imposed. For σNa and ANa
we set a lower bound of 0 and upper bound of 0.3. We allow a
burn-in phase of ∼ 50% of the total chain length, beyond which
the MCMC is converged. The posterior probability distribution
is then calculated from the latter 50% of the chain (see Section
5.2 for the results).
Article number, page 6 of 13
Passband
0.75Å
ANa
offset
σNa (Å )
0.128 ± 0.078
0.054 ± 0.040
0.077 ± 0.074
0.036 ± 0.061
1Å
1.5Å
3Å
0.017 ± 0.009
0.034 ± 0.025
0.031 ± 0.029
0.054 ± 0.067
0.007 ± 0.001
0.005 ± 0.001
0.002 ± 0.001
0.001 ± 0.001
Table 3. Best-fit values for the model parameters obtained from the Na
D1 and Na D2 excess light curves in the three integration bands. As a
reminder, here σNa is width of the exoplanetary Gaussian profile, ANa
is the amplitude of the exoplanetary Gaussian profile, and offset is the
normalization constant.
5.2. Best-fit parameters and uncertainties of the excess light
curve models
The best-fit model of each excess light curves are shown in the
top panels of Figure 4 and the values of the parameters as well
as their uncertainties are provided in Table 3. The posterior dis-
tributions of the fitting parameters and the correlation plots are
shown in the appendix Figure B.1 for the 1.5 Å excess light
curve. The bottom panels in Figure 4 show residuals after sub-
tracting the data from the model. The excess light curves have a
large noise level and thus the atmospheric absorption measure-
ments have large uncertainties (see Table 3). As Table 3 shows,
the significance of the signal is about 2σ in our narrowest inte-
gration band and the significance level reduces by the increase
of the passband. At 1.5 Å there is hardly a signal and the 3 Å
passband results in a null outcome. At narrower passbands the
contrast between the planetary and stellar flux contributions is
smaller, thus a larger signal is expected. The measured exoplan-
etary signal with this approach is compared with planetary atmo-
spheric models in Section 7.3.2.
6. Analysis and results: Division approach
6.1. Extraction of the exoplanetry spectrum through the
division approach
In transmission spectroscopy we compare the spectra taken
when the exoplanet is outside the transit with those taken dur-
ing the transit. Only the in-transit data contain the planet's at-
mospheric signatures, hence subtracting the out-of-transit spec-
trum from them, can reveal the exoplanetary features within the
residuals. The exoplanetary transmission spectrum is given by
(Fin − Fout)/Fout. In this simple equation, the average of all in-
transit spectra is considered as Fin (master-in) and average of all
of out-of transit spectra is considered as Fout (master-out). How-
ever, this method has a problem: As mentioned before, due to
orbital motion the exoplanetary RV changes and this causes the
shifts of the planetary sodium features relative to the stellar spec-
trum, hence the signal is diluted in the process of division. To
overcome this problem, after telluric corrections and alignment
of spectra, we divide each individual in-transit spectrum by the
master-out spectrum. Then, to line up the exoplanetary features,
Sara Khalafinejad et al.: The atmosphere of WASP-17b: Optical high-resolution transmission spectroscopy
Fig. 4. Top panels: Best-fit models plotted over the raw excess light-curves for four passbands. Bottom panels: The residuals for each passband.
Fig. 5. Transmission spectrum obtained by division approach. The black profile in the first panel is the stellar spectrum. The red profile in the
second panel is the division of the in-transit by the out-of-transit spectra, corrected for the exoplanetary RV shifts. The dark gray profile beneath
the red profile is the division after applying the trial manual shifts. The dark gray profile in the third panel is the division of two sets of out-of-transit
spectra. The green profile is the same division shifted with respect to the other by 0.004 Å. Finally, the shaded regions, represent the integration
bands at 0.75, 1, 1.5, and 3 Å.
we shift each residual based on the corresponding calculated ra-
dial velocity of the exoplanet in each exposure. We finally co-
add all residuals (similar to Wyttenbach et al. 2015, 2017) and
normalize the result with the same method explained in Section
3.1. We then consider the normalized residual as the transmis-
sion spectrum (see Section 6.2 and Figure 5 (middle panel). By
this method we correct for the RV component in the division ap-
proach as well.
It is important to note that in high-resolution transmission
spectroscopy accurate alignment of the spectra is a very impor-
tant step of the analysis. In the division slight misalignments can
cause systematic dips or spikes in the residuals. The precision of
the alignment depends on signal-to-noise and on the wavelength
sampling (or the resolution) of spectra. Simulating the scatter
and the wavelength sampling of our spectra on a Gaussian or
Voigt distribution, we obtain an uncertainty of up to 0.004 Å for
the line position. This amount of mis-alignment can still be a
source of variations in residuals at the location of strong lines
compared to the noise level at the continuum. Dividing two sets
of out-of-transit spectra by each other is a good approach to test
the alignment and the robustness of the signals in transmission
spectra. Hence, we also divide the average of out-of-transit spec-
tra in exposures 1 to 4 (Fout1) before the ingress by the master-out
spectra after the egress in exposures 30 to 34 (Fout2) by each other
(see Section 6.2 and Figure 5 (bottom panel). These two sets of
out-of-transit spectra have similar airmass, thus it can result in a
Article number, page 7 of 13
A&A proofs: manuscript no. aa
sodium feature in the transmission spectrum, yields σNa = (0.085
± 0.034) Å and ANa = (1.3 ± 0.6)%. The error of each Gaussian
fit is estimated through a MCMC procedure, where the error bar
on each residual data point is equal to standard deviation of con-
tinuum region in the residuals scaled by the stellar flux.
Another relatively large feature we see in the residuals (mid-
dle panel) is the scatter of data at the location of interstellar
sodium lines. We note that the flux values at stellar and inter-
stellar lines are low, thus the S/N of data at the core of these
lines are lower compared to the continuum. Hence, larger scatter
is inevitably present in the residuals at the location of these lines
(further discussed in Section 6.3).
The division of two sets of out-of-transit spectra by each
other are also shown as complementary and comparative infor-
mation in the last panels of Figure 5. Naturally, we expect no
feature at the sodium line positions in this profile. We see that the
scatter of the points is relatively large at stellar and interstellar
sodium line positions. However, the number out-of-transit expo-
sures that build up this profile are less than the profile in the sec-
ond panel by about a factor of 2 and, on average they are taken
at larger airmass and lower S/N compared to the exposures that
build up the profile in the second panel. Hence, even in the con-
tinuum the scatter is larger compared to the second panel. Since
the features in these residuals at any of the sodium lines sodium
lines, do not exceed 3σ we consider the green profile as uniform
scatter around unity.
Further discussion on evaluating the robustness of the exo-
planetary absorption feature is in Section 7. Our observed trans-
mission spectrum is then compared to a planetary atmospheric
model in Section 7.3.1.
6.3. Residuals of the division
The residuals in Figure 5 (middle panel) shows relatively larger
variations at the interstellar line positions. As discussed in Sec-
tion 6.2 these features are related to the lower S/N at these lines.
As can be seen in the top panel of the figure, the interstellar D2
line has the largest depth among all four sodium lines; the feature
of the residual related to this line is also more pronounced. How-
ever, other reasons such as mis-alignments smaller than 0.004 Å
or changes of spectral line resolutions due to Earth's atmospheric
effects can create such features. Looking at the un-binned resid-
uals of Wyttenbach et al. (2017) for the case of WASP-49b, we
see larger variations at the small interstellar sodium lines in their
data as well. Compared to that work, interstellar lines in our case
are stronger. In addition, MIKE is not as stable as HARPS and
the resolution of our instrument is smaller by about a factor of
two and thus the spectral alignment precision is less by about a
factor of two. In any case, a complete removal of these features
is not possible with this dataset and we continue the analysis as-
suming that features of residual spectrum at the position of the
stellar sodium line are caused by the excess absorption of the
exoplanetary atmosphere.
Fig. 6. RM model vs. spectral mis-alignments of sodium region. Blue
crosses, show the misalignment in the sodium lines region (already
shown in Figure 1. Green field circles show the calculated RM effect.
Red dash-dotted line shows the alignment precision of the data (± 0.004
Å). RM effect is below the precision of the alignment.
second order correction of the tellurics. In addition, in the case of
this target, we can use the interstellar sodium lines as a reference
for evaluation of the alignment. The interstellar lines are con-
stant and thus in the division are expected to result in values that
are uniformly scattered around unity. Thus, if the initial align-
ment does not satisfy this condition, an additional shift can be
applied to improve the alignment. In each single division stage
in our analysis, we manually shift each in-transit spectrum with
respect to the master-out, in a way to minimize the variations of
the residuals at the position of interstellar lines. The amount of
shifts we apply are between 0 and ± 0.004 Å (with the steps of
0.0005 Å) which is less than the precision of the initial align-
ment method. However, the final outcome with this method does
not considerably alter the transmission spectrum and the resid-
uals of the interstellar features do not reduce by the additional
manual shifts. In Figure 5 the result of a set of manual shift trial
on in-transit exposures are shown in gray beneath the red pro-
file. In contrast, in the case of division of two sets of out-transit
spectra, applying an additional shift of about 0.004 Å to one of
the spectra, reduces the scatter of residuals. In Figure 5 (bottom
panel), gray profile shows the initial division and green profile
shows the division after applying the manual shifts.
We also need to think of any effect that causes a difference
between the alignment of interstellar and the stellar lines. The
RM effect is a possible source that affects the stellar lines but do
not influence the interstellar lines. Based on the literature values
of the orbital parameters (Anderson et al. 2011), we simulated a
model of the RM effect in transit of WASP-17b and reduced it
from the values of the spectral mis-alignment introduced in Sec-
tion 3.1. The RM model is shown in Figure 6 on top of spectral
shift values. The largest difference that the RM effect can cause
is up to 0.003 Å which is again below the precision of the initial
alignment with our method. The removal of the RM effect from
the shifts does not considerably affect the residual outcome (sim-
ilar to the manual shifts in the second panel). Hence we continue
the work while ignoring this effect.
6.2. Transmission spectrum of the division approach
Figure 5 summarizes the results of the division approach analy-
sis. The master-out spectrum (or the stellar spectrum) is shown
in the top panel, where the stellar and interstellar sodium lines
can be clearly seen. The second panel shows the radial velocity
corrected transmission spectrum of WASP-17b. The exoplane-
tary sodium absorption by D1 is visible at 5896 Å and the ab-
sorption at D2 is placed at 5890 Å. Fitting a Gaussian in each
7. Discussion
7.1. Excess light curve vs. division approach
In our light curve approach we do not directly measure any light
curve depth. Instead we estimate the shape of the exoplanetary
sodium Gaussian profile. In the division approach we obtain the
transmission spectrum in the sodium region, where the shape of
exoplanetary sodium line is directly visible.
Article number, page 8 of 13
42024Time since mid-transit (hours)0.60.40.20.00.20.40.6Shifts (Km/s) Sara Khalafinejad et al.: The atmosphere of WASP-17b: Optical high-resolution transmission spectroscopy
Table 4. sigma and amplitude of the exoplanetary Gaussian in light
curve approach Vs. sigma and amplitude in division approach
Light curve approach
Division approach
σNa (Å )
0.128 ± 0.078
0.085 ± 0.034
ANa
0.017 ± 0.009
0.013 ± 0.006
Fig. 7. The differential limb-darkening model component (dashed
curve) vs. the radial velocity model component (solid curve) for the
integration passband of 0.75 Å.
Table 3, shows the values of widths and amplitudes of the fit-
ted Gaussian at different passbands. The robustness of the mea-
surements decreases with the increase of passbands, thus we
consider the measurement at 0.75 Å as the best measurement.
In Table 4 we compare the σNa and the ANa of exoplanetary
sodium Gaussian obtained in light curve approach, with those
obtained in division approach. Within the error bars, the values
are consistent with each other.
Our measured error bars on the exoplanetary feature are quite
large. A comparison of the standard deviation of the data outside
the transit with the expected signal at the sodium lines shows that
the detection cannot reach confidence levels larger than 2σ and
this illustrates the under-estimation of the error bars in previous
analysis of the same data set.
We note that in the division approach we do not apply any differ-
ential limb-darkening correction on the spectra and their residu-
als directly. However, investigation of the model components in
Figure 7 indicates that the LD model is about an order of magni-
tude smaller than the exoplanetary absorption effects in a F-type
star. Thus the strength of this effect is already within the error
bars and can be ignored in the division approach.
7.2. Comparison to previous measurements
7.2.1. Comparison of absorption signals
In order to be able to compare our measurements with other
work, we average out the exoplanetary line flux in different pass-
bands in both approaches. The results are shown in Table 5 and
the values are compared to measurements of Zhou & Bayliss
(2012) and Wood et al. (2011), obtained from high-resolution
analysis. These measurements are consistent with each other
within the error bars. The source of the difference between them
could be in RV component correction and in the different ap-
proach in measurement of the signal. For example, Zhou &
Bayliss (2012) measure directly the depth of the fitted light curve
while we measure the average of the flux in the fitted exoplan-
etary sodium line Gaussian. By looking at Figure 4 at 0.75 Å
and roughly measuring the depth of the modeled light curve, we
achieve a similar result to Zhou & Bayliss (2012).
We additionally calculate the absorption signal presented in
the low-resolution transmission spectrum of WASP-17b by Sing
et al. (2016) as well as the upper limit on the non-detection of
sodium in the transmission spectrum obtained by Sedaghati et al.
(2016). The results are also shown in Table 5. To compute the
values, we measure the difference in the RP/RS value between the
data point at the wavelength of sodium and the continuum level,
and we also covert the radius ratios (RP/RS) to the flux ratios
(Fin/Fout) to unify the units. Assuming a relation of f (x) = 1
x for
the absorption as a function of passband and considering that all
the exoplanetary absorption signal is coming from the line center
at 0.75 Å passband, we compute the values listed in the last row
of the table. If the exoplanetary sodium line wings are broader
than the high-resolution passbands, then the low-resolution bin
size covers the exoplanetary feature more completely. Compari-
son of our high-resolution expected values to the low-resolution
measurements at 5 Å and 50 Å passbands/bin size, shows that
the values in low-resolution observations are larger but the re-
sults are consistent with each other within the error-bars. Influ-
ence of stellar activity can be another source of variability be-
tween the measurements of different epochs.
7.2.2. Offset between the center of the stellar and planetary
sodium lines
By looking at the sodium line center in the top and middle panel
in Figure 5, we recognize an offset of ∼ 0.15Å (7.5 kms−1) be-
tween sodium residuals and the center of stellar sodium line.
Wyttenbach et al. (2015) has seen a similar shift in the Na sig-
nal of HD 189733b. We must emphasis that the alignment of the
exoplanetary features before co-adding the residuals is highly
dependent on the accuracy and precision of the calculated radial
velocities of the exoplanet relative to its host star. In calculation
of the radial velocities, changing the values of orbital parame-
ters, i.e., semi-major axis and period, even within their error bars
affects this offset. For example, considering a 2-σ upper limit on
the semi-major axis calculated by Anderson et al. (2010) or 1-σ
upper limit by Southworth et al. (2012), the maximum offset that
we measure reaches about 6 kms−1 which corresponds to about
0.12 Å .
7.3. Atmospheric physical properties
7.3.1. Comparison to atmospheric models: Division
approach
To model the WASP-17b high-resolution transmission spec-
trum and obtain a physical description of the data, we use the
open-source Python Radiative Transfer in a Bayesian framework
(Pyrat-Bay1, Cubillos et al., in prep.), based on the Bayesian
Atmospheric Radiative Transfer package (Blecic 2016; Cubillos
2016).
Due to the wavelength normalization (Section 3.3), high-
resolution transmission spectra do not constrain the planet-to-
star radius ratio (as is the case for lower-resolution transmission
spectroscopy). For the narrow wavelength range covered by our
observations, the spectra are dominated by the strong sodium
doublet lines embedded into the Rayleigh absorption, which sets
a continuum transmission level around the sodium lines. Thus,
1 http://pcubillos.github.io/pyratbay
In addition, a Reproducible Research Compendium for the Pyrat-Bay
analysis is available at:
https://github.com/pcubillos/KhalafinejadEtal2018_WASP17b
Article number, page 9 of 13
420246Time since mid-transit (hour)0.9930.9940.9950.9960.9970.9980.9991.0001.001Relative flux Table 5. Estimated signal in per cent, for both light curve (LC) and Division (Div.) approaches, compared to the measurments by Zhou et al.
(2012), Wood et al. (2011), Sing et al. (2016) and Sedaghati et al. (2016). The last row roughly shows the expected absorption signal, considering
the relation of f (x) = 1
x for the absorption as a function of passband and using our measurement at 0.75 Å (LC) as the narrowest absorption band.
A&A proofs: manuscript no. aa
Passband (Å )
This work (LC)
This work (Div.)
Zhou et al.
Wood et al.
Sing et al.
Sedaghati et al.
1/x
1
0.55 ± 0.43
0.34 ± 0.20
0.75
0.74 ± 0.54
0.46 ± 0.29
1.46 ± 0.017
1.5
0.40 ± 0.29
0.22 ± 0.12
0.58 ± 0.13
0.55 ± 0.13
3
0.19 ± 0.15
0.12 ± 0.06
0.49 ± 0.09
0.74 ± 0.54
0.55 ± 0.41
0.37 ± 0.026
0.18 ± 0.13
5
50
0.33 ± 0.18
0.11 ± 0.08
0.10 ± 0.09
0.01 ± 0.01
Fig. 8. High-resolution spectrum (black points with 1σ error bars) and best-fitting model (solid blue line) around the sodium doublet lines for the
retrieval at solar Na abundance. The shaded area denotes the wavelength region used to constrain the models. The green and red lines denote the
model spectrum if R0 were five percent smaller or larger, respectively.
Fig. 9. Pairwise and marginal MCMC posterior distributions for the atmospheric retrievals with fixed (left) and free (right) Na abundance. The
shaded area in the marginal posterior histograms denote the 68% highest-probability-density region of the posteriors.
this data traces the differential transmission modulation of the
sodium lines with respect to the Rayleigh continuum.
The Pyrat-Bay model initially computes the modulation
spectrum or spectrum ratio (Brown 2001):
the high-resolution data, the code calculates
R =
1 − M(λ)
1 − M(λref)
=
fin(λ)/ fin(λref)
fout(λ)/ fout(λref) ,
(3)
M(λ) =
fin(λ) − fout(λ)
fout(λ)
,
(2)
where fin(λ) and fout(λ) are the in- and out-of-transit flux spec-
trum, respectively. To replicate the wavelength normalization of
Article number, page 10 of 13
where λref is a wavelength far away from the sodium lines.
To produce the transmission spectra, the Pyrat-Bay code
solves the radiative-transfer equation for an 1D atmospheric
model consisting of spherically concentric layers, in hydrostatic
equilibrium. For the WASP-17b data, we sample the atmosphere
between 100 and 10−15 bar with 200 layers. Our forward model
588858895890Wavelength(A)0.970.980.991.001.011.02589458955896Wavelength(A)500100015002000T(K)1.751.801.85R0(RJup)1.751.801.85R0(RJup)1.71.81.9R0(RJup)100020003000T(K)2.50.02.5[Na/H]1.71.81.9R0(RJup)2.50.02.5[Na/H]0.00.20.50.81.0Posterior density Sara Khalafinejad et al.: The atmosphere of WASP-17b: Optical high-resolution transmission spectroscopy
incorporates opacities for H2 Rayleigh scattering (Lecavelier
Des Etangs et al. 2008), and the sodium lines (Burrows et al.
2000). Other opacity sources like collision induced absorption
do not play a significant role at the observed wavelengths as their
opacities decay exponentially as one goes toward shorted wave-
lengths (see, for example, figures in Abel et al. 2011, 2012). We
also discard cloud opacities, based on previous transmission ob-
servations of this planet (Sing et al. 2016; Sedaghati et al. 2016).
For the retrieval we consider the simplified case of a solar-
abundance atmosphere with thermochemical-equilibrium com-
positions (Blecic et al. 2016). Thus, we retrieve two atmospheric
parameters, the atmospheric temperature (T, as an isothermal
profile) and the radius of the planet (R0) at a reference pressure
p0 = 0.1 bar (necessary to solve the differential hydrostatic equa-
tion).
To explore the parameter space, Pyrat-Bay uses the
differential-evolution Markov-chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) al-
gorithm (Cubillos et al. 2017), constrained by the high-
resolution data in the 3 half-width at half maximum region
around each sodium line. We also fit
the modulation (Eq.
2) to the optical broad-band transit depth 0.01524 ± 0.00027
(Sedaghati et al. 2016).
As part of our modeling approach, we solve the hydrostatic-
equilibrium equation to relate the altitude and pressure profiles
of the model: r = r(p). Since this is a first-order differential
equation, we need a 'boundary condition' of the form R0 = r(p0)
to obtain the particular solution of the equation. The typical pro-
cedure is to either fix R0 or p0, and then find their p0 or R0 coun-
terpart (respectively) that fits the observations. The selection of
the fixed reference point is arbitrary (we choose p0 = 0.1 bar in
this article). The challenge is that transmission observations do
not directly constrain the pair R0, p0, but rather allow for degen-
erate solutions to this problem (see, e.g., Griffith 2014). Thus, the
nature of the problem require us to include R0 as a free parameter
of the atmospheric model. We include the broad-band constraint
to break down one of the degeneracies of the atmospheric model,
although other correlations still remain.
We adopt two configurations for the retrieval. An initial run
assumes a fixed solar Na composition of 1.7 parts per million
(Asplund et al. 2009), letting free the temperature and reference
radius. A second run, lets the sodium abundance vary as a free
parameter along with the other two parameters. All model pa-
rameters have uniform priors, and thus, the observations are the
main driver of the MCMC posterior distribution.
Figures 8 shows our atmospheric model over the high-
resolution transmission data (residuals) and Figure 9 shows the
bestfit model and the parameter posteriors, respectively. When
adopting a fixed solar sodium abundance, we retrieve an atmo-
spheric temperature of T = 1550+170−200 K, which is consistent to
1σ with the planet's equilibrium temperature (1770± 35 K), and
a reference radius of R0 = 1.81 ± 0.02 RJup. As expected, the re-
trieval with free sodium abundances has broader posterior distri-
butions. The degeneracy of solutions lead to strongly correlated
posteriors. The sodium abundance is unconstrained within our
chosen exploration domain of 10−4 -- 103 solar abundances. The
retrieved temperature is T = 1250+800−70 K, while the reference
radius ranges between 1.78 -- 1.88 RJup.
7.3.2. Comparison to atmospheric models: Excess light
curve approach
The model that fits the residuals at the sodium lines in division
approach, can be used for comparison to the excess light curve
absorption signals. For this purpose after applying the instru-
Fig. 10. Atmospheric model vs. observation in the excess light curve
approach. The dashed blue line is the result of averaging atmospheric
model at the sodium absorption features in different passbands. The
green data, attached to each other by the solid line, are the result of
our ecxess light curve measurements in four different passbands.
mental broadening, we change the sampling of the models to
match the sampling of the observations and then average out the
model in different passbands the same way that we estimate the
absorption signal in the observations. The result of this compar-
ison is shown in Figure 10. As the figure shows the model and
the observational data are coherent. Here we note that it is not
practical to apply an independent atmospheric model fit to this
approach, since the current model is already well within the large
error bars.
8. Summary and conclusions
The aim of this work is the atmospheric characterization of the
inflated hot Jupiter, WASP-17b, using transmission spectroscopy
method in narrow wavelength bands centered on the sodium
lines. We used 37 high-resolution spectra taken during a sin-
gle transit of the target, using MIKE instrument on Magellan
Telescopes. Our analysis consists of three main sections: (1) In-
vestigation of the stellar activity through chromospheric lines of
Hα and Ca ii IRT, (2) investigation of the exoplanetry sodium ab-
sorption through the excess light curves in narrow pass-bands
and (3) through the division of in-transit by the out-of-transit
spectra.
We detect no strong chromospheric line absorption or strong
stellar variability during the observations. In the excess light
curves we detect tentative signatures of exoplanetary sodium
with the Gaussian width of (0.128 ± 0.078) Å and Gaussian am-
plitude of (1.7 ± 0.9)%. Through the the division approach the
measured Gaussian width and amplitudes are (0.085 ± 0.034) Å
and (1.3 ± 0.6)% respectively. Finally, in order to extract some
of the physical properties we compare our results with the plan-
etary atmospheric models. Our conclusions are listed below:
-- Our re-analysis of this data set suggests under-estimation of
the uncertainties in the exoplanetary absorption signal mea-
sured by Zhou & Bayliss (2012). This is originated in the
way of interpreting the excess light curve.
-- High-precision alignment (> 0.004 Å ) and high signal-to-
noise (> 100) of the spectra are crucial in achieving a robust
ground-based transmission spectrum through a single transit
observation.
-- Comparing our measurements with the Pyrat-Bay retrieval
model, for WASP-17b we constrained an atmospheric tem-
perature of 1550+170−200 K, and a reference radius at 0.1 bar of
1.81 ± 0.02 RJup
Article number, page 11 of 13
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.5Passband0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.4Excess Na absorption (%)ModelObservation A&A proofs: manuscript no. aa
-- During high-resolution transmission spectroscopy on sodium
lines, simultaneous high-resolution spectral observation of
the stellar activity indicators, such as Ca ii H & K, Hα and
Ca ii IRT, reveals possible effects of stellar flaring activity on
transmission spectra.
-- We have developed a framework for high-resolution trans-
mission spectroscopy in narrow passbands inside atomic
lines. This framework can be applied on a higher qual-
ity data, for achieving more robust exoplanetary signals at
higher confidence level.
Acknowledgements. S. Khalafinejad would like to firstly thank M. Holman for
providing the required funding for visiting the Center for Astrophysics (CfA),
where we could establish this work. In addition, we acknowledge Deutsche For-
schungsgemeinschaft (DFG), in the framework of RTG 1351 and MIN faculty of
Hamburg University for providing the second part of funding of this project. C.
von Essen acknowledges funding for the Stellar Astrophysics Centre, provided
by The Danish National Research Foundation (Grant DNRF106). We would also
like to thank B. Fuhrmeister, S. Czesla, L. Fossati, M. Lindle, M. Guedel, J. Hoei-
jmakers, F. Yan and N. Espinoza for useful scientific discussions on various top-
ics related to exoplanetray atmospheric studies. We additionally appreciate the
National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy of the Australian Fed-
eral Government, who supported the access to the Magellan Telescopes. We are
also grateful to contributors to Numpy (van der Walt et al. 2011), SciPy (Jones
et al. 2001), Matplotlib (Hunter 2007), the Python Programming Language, and
the free and open-source community. Finally, we thank the anonymous referee
for the useful comments which resulted in improvement of the contents of the
paper.
References
Abel, M., Frommhold, L., Li, X., & Hunt, K. L. C. 2011, The Journal of Physical
Chemistry A, 115, 6805, pMID: 21207941
Abel, M., Frommhold, L., Li, X., & Hunt, K. L. C. 2012, J. Chem. Phys., 136,
Albrecht, S. 2008, PhD thesis, Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, P.O. Box
9513, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
Allart, R., Lovis, C., Pino, L., et al. 2017, A&A, 606, A144
Anderson, D. R., Hellier, C., Gillon, M., et al. 2010, ApJ, 709, 159
Anderson, D. R., Smith, A. M. S., Lanotte, A. A., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 416,
Griffith, C. A. 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London
Hauschildt, P. H. & Baron, E. 1999, Journal of Computational and Applied Math-
Series A, 372, 20130086
ematics, 109, 41
Heng, K. 2016, ApJ, 826, L16
Hoeijmakers, H. J., de Kok, R. J., Snellen, I. A. G., et al. 2015, A&A, 575, A20
Høg, E., Fabricius, C., Makarov, V. V., et al. 2000, A&A, 355, L27
Huitson, C. M., Sing, D. K., Vidal-Madjar, A., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 2477
Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing In Science & Engineering, 9, 90
Husser, T.-O., Wende-von Berg, S., Dreizler, S., et al. 2013, A&A, 553, A6
Jensen, A. G., Redfield, S., Endl, M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 751, 86
Jones, E., Oliphant, T., Peterson, P., et al. 2001, SciPy: Open source scientific
tools for Python, [Online; accessed 2017-02-12]
Kempton, E. M.-R., Perna, R., & Heng, K. 2014, ApJ, 795, 24
Khalafinejad, S., von Essen, C., Hoeijmakers, H. J., et al. 2017, A&A, 598, A131
Klocova, T., Czesla, S., Khalafinejad, S., Wolter, U., & Schmitt, J. H. M. M.
Kopal, Z. 1950, Harvard College Observatory Circular, 454, 1
Lecavelier Des Etangs, A., Pont, F., Vidal-Madjar, A., & Sing, D. 2008, A&A,
2017, ArXiv e-prints
481, L83
Mandell, A. M., Haynes, K., Sinukoff, E., et al. 2013, ApJ, 779, 128
Martínez-Arnáiz, R., Maldonado, J., Montes, D., Eiroa, C., & Montesinos, B.
2010, A&A, 520, A79
Moehler, S., Modigliani, A., Freudling, W., et al. 2014, A&A, 568, A9
Morley, C. V., Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 815, 110
Nortmann, L. 2015, PhD thesis, der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Oshagh, M., Santos, N. C., Boisse, I., et al. 2013, A&A, 556, A19
Oshagh, M., Santos, N. C., Ehrenreich, D., et al. 2014, A&A, 568, A99
Pont, F., Knutson, H., Gilliland, R. L., Moutou, C., & Charbonneau, D. 2008,
MNRAS, 385, 109
Reiners, A. 2012, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 9, 1
Salz, M., Schneider, P. C., Czesla, S., & Schmitt, J. H. M. M. 2016, A&A, 585,
Seager, S. & Sasselov, D. D. 2000, ApJ, 537, 916
Sedaghati, E., Boffin, H. M. J., Jerabková, T., et al. 2016, A&A, 596, A47
Sedaghati, E., Boffin, H. M. J., MacDonald, R. J., et al. 2017, Nature, 549, 238
Sing, D. K., Fortney, J. J., Nikolov, N., et al. 2016, Nature, 529, 59
Sing, D. K., Huitson, C. M., Lopez-Morales, M., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 1663
Southworth, J., Hinse, T. C., Dominik, M., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 1338
Triaud, A. H. M. J., Collier Cameron, A., Queloz, D., et al. 2010, A&A, 524,
van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. 2011, Computing in Science
& Engineering, 13, 22
Vidal-Madjar, A., Sing, D. K., Lecavelier Des Etangs, A., et al. 2011, A&A, 527,
L2
A25
A110
A62
044319
2108
L224
A11
Andretta, V., Busà, I., Gomez, M. T., & Terranegra, L. 2005, A&A, 430, 669
Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481
Bayliss, D. D. R., Winn, J. N., Mardling, R. A., & Sackett, P. D. 2010, ApJ, 722,
Wolter, U., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., & van Wyk, F. 2005, A&A, 435, 261
Wood, P. L., Maxted, P. F. L., Smalley, B., & Iro, N. 2011, MNRAS, 412, 2376
Wyttenbach, A., Ehrenreich, D., Lovis, C., Udry, S., & Pepe, F. 2015, A&A, 577,
Bento, J., Wheatley, P. J., Copperwheat, C. M., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 437, 1511
Blecic, J. 2016, ArXiv e-prints
Blecic, J., Harrington, J., & Bowman, M. O. 2016, ApJS, 225, 4
Bourrier, V., Lecavelier des Etangs, A., & Vidal-Madjar, A. 2015, A&A, 573,
Wyttenbach, A., Lovis, C., Ehrenreich, D., et al. 2017, ArXiv e-prints
Yan, F. & Henning, T. 2018, Nature Astronomy
Zhou, G. & Bayliss, D. D. R. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 2483
Brown, T. M. 2001, ApJ, 553, 1006
Burrows, A., Marley, M. S., & Sharp, C. M. 2000, ApJ, 531, 438
Busà, I., Aznar Cuadrado, R., Terranegra, L., Andretta, V., & Gomez, M. T. 2007,
A&A, 466, 1089
Cauley, P. W., Redfield, S., & Jensen, A. G. 2017a, ArXiv e-prints
Cauley, P. W., Redfield, S., & Jensen, A. G. 2017b, AJ, 153, 81
Cauley, P. W., Redfield, S., Jensen, A. G., & Barman, T. 2016, AJ, 152, 20
Cessateur, G., Kretzschmar, M., Dudok de Wit, T., & Boumier, P. 2010,
Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Noyes, R. W., & Gilliland, R. L. 2002, ApJ,
Sol. Phys., 263, 153
568, 377
Chmielewski, Y. 2000, A&A, 353, 666
Cincunegui, C., Díaz, R. F., & Mauas, P. J. D. 2007, A&A, 469, 309
Cubillos, P., Harrington, J., Loredo, T. J., et al. 2017, AJ, 153, 3
Cubillos, P. E. 2016, ArXiv e-prints
Czesla, S., Huber, K. F., Wolter, U., Schröter, S., & Schmitt, J. H. M. M. 2009,
A&A, 505, 1277
2015, A&A, 582, A51
A&A, 607, A101
Czesla, S., Klocová, T., Khalafinejad, S., Wolter, U., & Schmitt, J. H. M. M.
Czesla, S., Salz, M., Schneider, P. C., Mittag, M., & Schmitt, J. H. M. M. 2017,
Foreman-Mackey, D., Conley, A., Meierjurgen Farr, W., et al. 2013, emcee: The
MCMC Hammer, Astrophysics Source Code Library
Fortney, J. J., Shabram, M., Showman, A. P., et al. 2010, ApJ, 709, 1396
Article number, page 12 of 13
Appendix A: Transmission spectra around Hα and
Ca II IRT
We confirm that the source of the variations in Hα and Ca II
IRT lines is stellar activity and not the exoplanetary extended
atmosphere. In Fig. A.1, we show the transmission spectra in the
stellar rest frame related to the Hα and one of the Ca II IRT lines.
The other two Ca II IRT lines behave similarly.
In the Hα region (Fig. A.1-left), the residuals are clean cos-
mic rays and telluric contamination are already removed. The
strongest variation clearly occurs in the line center, and in the
stellar rest frame as opposed to the planetary rest frame. We at-
tribute this evolution to stellar activity. The IRT lines show a
similar behaviour (see e.g., Fig. A.1-right).
Appendix B: MCMC complementary figures
A sample of the MCMC posterior distribution in the excess light
curve modeling is shown in Fig. B.1.
Sara Khalafinejad et al.: The atmosphere of WASP-17b: Optical high-resolution transmission spectroscopy
Fig. A.1. left: Transit spectrum of Hα. We show in the mean stellar spectrum, the removed telluric absorption spectrum, the in- divided by out-of-
transit spectrum and the post- divided by the pre-transit spectrum. There is an excess in the line core during the transit phase, most likely related
to stellar activity. Right: The same for one of the Ca II lines.
Fig. B.1. Posterior distributions of the model parameters fitted in this work in the shape of histograms, along with their correlation plots, for the
passband of 1.5 Å.
Article number, page 13 of 13
0.250.500.751.00Normalized flux202Fin/Fout - 1 (%)655865606562656465666568Wavelength (Å)202Fpost/Fpre - 1 (%)3002001000100200300Velocity (km s-1)0.250.500.751.00Normalized flux202Fin/Fout - 1 (%)865486568658866086628664866686688670Wavelength (Å)202Fpost/Fpre - 1 (%)3002001000100200300Velocity (km s-1)0.040.080.120.16Amp0.060.120.180.240.30Sig0.00000.00150.00300.0045off0.040.080.120.16Amp0.00000.00150.00300.0045off |
1008.4027 | 1 | 1008 | 2010-08-24T12:26:21 | Lunar Palaeoregolith Deposits as Recorders of the Galactic Environment of the Solar System and Implications for Astrobiology | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | One of the principal scientific reasons for wanting to resume in situ exploration of the lunar surface is to gain access to the record it contains of early Solar System history. Part of this record will pertain to the galactic environment of the Solar System, including variations in the cosmic ray flux, energetic galactic events (e.g, supernovae and/or gamma-ray bursts), and passages of the Solar System through dense interstellar clouds. Much of this record is of astrobiological interest as these processes may have affected the evolution of life on Earth, and perhaps other Solar System bodies. We argue that this galactic record, as for that of more local Solar System processes also of astrobiological interest, will be best preserved in ancient, buried regolith ('palaeoregolith') deposits in the lunar near sub-surface. Locating and sampling such deposits will be an important objective of future lunar exploration activities. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | Accepted Manuscript
Editorial Manager(tm) for Earth, Moon, and Planets
Manuscript Number: MOON551R1
Title: Lunar Palaeoregolith Deposits as Recorders of the Galactic Environment of the So lar System and
Implications for Astrobiology
Article Type: SI:Astrobiology on the Moon
Keywords: Moon; Lunar regolith; Galactic history; Galactic structure; Lunar exploration; Astrobiology
Corresponding Author: Dr. Ian Crawford,
Corresponding Author's Institution: Birkbeck College
First Author: Ian Crawford
Order of Authors: Ian Crawford; Sarah Fagents; Katherine Joy; Elise Rumpf
Manuscript Region of Origin: UNITED KINGDOM
Lunar Palaeoregolith Deposits as Recorders of the
Galactic Environment of the Solar System and
Implications for Astrobiology
Ian A. Crawford1,2, Sarah A. Fagents3, Katherine H. Joy2,4,5
and M. Elise Rumpf 3
1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of
London, Malet Street, London, WC1E 7HX, UK. Email: [email protected]
2Centre for Planetary Sciences at UCL/Birkbeck, University College London,
Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT. UK.
3Hawaii Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI
96822, USA.
4The Center for Lunar Science and Exploration, Lunar and Planetary
Institute, Houston, TX 77058, USA.
5The NASA Lunar Science Institute.
Abstract. One of the principal scientific reasons for wanting to resume in situ
exploration of the lunar surface is to gain access to the record it contains of early
Solar System history. Part of this record will pertain to the galactic environment of the
Solar System, including variations in the cosmic ray flux, energetic galactic events
(e.g, supernovae and/or gamma-ray bursts), and passages of the Solar System through
dense interstellar clouds. Much of this record is of astrobiological interest as these
processes may have affected the evolution of life on Earth, and perhaps other Solar
System bodies. We argue that this galactic record, as for that of more local Solar
System processes also of astrobiological interest, will be best preserved in ancient,
buried regolith (‘palaeoregolith’) deposits in the lunar near sub-surface. Locating and
sampling such deposits will be an important objective of future lunar exploration
activities.
1 Introduction
Studies of Apollo samples have revealed that the lunar regolith is
efficient at collecting and retaining materials that fall onto it. This
includes a record of implanted solar wind material (McKay et al., 1991;
Lucey et al., 2006), which may be used to study the composition and
evolution of the Sun (e.g Crozaz et al., 1977; Kerridge et al., 1991;
Wieler et al., 1996). Recently, samples of the Earth’s atmosphere also
appear to have been retrieved from lunar regolith samples (Ozima et al.,
2005; 2008), opening up the possibility that the lunar geological record
may help inform our understanding of the evolution of our own planet. It
has further been suggested that samples of Earth’s early crust may also be
preserved in lunar regolith, in the form of terrestrial meteorites blasted off
the Earth in giant impact events (Gutiérrez, 2002; Armstrong et al., 2002;
Crawford et al., 2008; see also the paper by J. Armstrong elsewhere in
this volume). Indeed, all meteorites retrieved from the lunar regolith [of
which there have already been several; e.g. McSween (1976), Joliff et al.,
(1993); Rubin (1997)], would be of compelling interest because of the
constraints they would provide on models of the composition and
dynamics of near Earth objects throughout Solar System history.
In addition to these local Solar System records, the lunar regolith retains a
record of galactic cosmic rays (GCRs) in the form of cosmogenic
nuclides and tracks of radiation damage within crystal lattices (e.g.
Crozaz et al., 1977; McKay et al., 1991; Goswami, 2001; Lucey et al.,
2006), and possibly particles originating in the local interstellar medium
(Brilliant et al., 1992; Wimmer-Schweingruber and Bochsler, 2001). All
these records would potentially yield valuable information regarding the
near-Earth cosmic environment throughout Solar System history, much of
it of clear astrobiological interest (e.g. Spudis, 1996; Crawford, 2006;
Fagents et al., 2010).
As we have dealt with the importance and preservation of solar wind-
implanted volatiles in a previous publication (Fagents et al., 2010), we
here concentrate on the record of the Sun’s galactic environment that may
be preserved in ancient lunar regolith deposits. In Section 2, we first
outline the various aspects of this record and its astrobiological
significance; in Section 3 we describe how such a record is likely to be
preserved on the Moon; and in Section 4 we describe it might be located
and recovered; we draw some conclusions in Section 5.
2 A Lunar Record of the Sun’s Galactic Environment
The Sun has revolved around the Galaxy approximately twenty times
since the formation of the Solar System (e.g. Gies and Helsel, 2005), and
during this time the Moon’s surface will have been exposed to a wide
range of galactic environments. At least three consequences of exposure
to these different environments are of relevance to astrobiology and may
have left a record on the lunar surface: variations in the flux of ionising
radiation; occasional accretion of gas and dust during passages through
dense interstellar clouds; and variations in the impact cratering rate owing
to disturbances of the Oort Cloud. We discuss each of these, and their
astrobiological significance, below.
2.1 Variations the flux of galactic ionising radiation
There are several ways in which the flux of ionising radiation (principally
GCRs and gamma rays) at the Earth and other terrestrial planets might
affect planetary habitability. Possible effects include direct damage to
DNA and other biomolecules; planetary cooling due to increased cloud
cover owing to tropospheric ionisation and the generation of cloud
condensation nuclei; the generation of acid rain resulting from the
formation of nitrous oxides; and increased surface UV flux as a result of
cosmic ray-induced ozone destruction (for recent reviews covering these
various processes see: Shaviv, 2006; Scherer, et al., 2006; Kirby and
Carslaw, 2006; Medvedev and Melott, 2007; Ferrari and Szuszkiewicz,
2009; and Dartnell, 2010).
As summarised by Shaviv (2006) and Scherer et al. (2006), there are a
variety of galactic processes that affect the GCR flux in the inner Solar
System, operating on a range of timescales. On the longest timescales (>
1 Gyr), the average GCR flux probably reflects the galactic star formation
rate. This would provide very useful constraints on models of galactic
evolution, but is perhaps only of tangential interest to astrobiology
(although, of course, a better understanding of star formation rates, and
associated galactic chemical evolution, is relevant to understanding the
history of galactic habitability on the largest spatial and temporal scales).
Of more direct astrobiological interest would be to search for evidence of
very energetic events (e.g. gamma-ray bursts; GRBs), which may have
been more frequent earlier in galactic history and which potentially could
have had a drastic effect on habitable planets throughout the Galaxy (e.g.
Thorsett 1995; Annis, 1999; Scalo and Wheeler, 2002; Thomas, 2009).
Although life on Earth appears never to have been exterminated by such
events, it would nevertheless be of interest to know whether any occurred
which might be correlated with evolutionary events in the fossil record
(and, again, quantifying the frequency of GRBs would improve our
the
understanding of galactic habitability as a whole). While
consequences of a galactic GRB on the terrestrial environment may have
been severe, the Earth’s surviving geological record from the time period
in question is so poorly preserved that identifying an unambiguous record
of such events on this planet appears unlikely; the lunar surface, and in
particular sufficiently ancient and well-preserved regolith deposits, would
seem to offer much stronger prospects.
On shorter timescales (of the order of a few 100 Myr) the GCR flux is
likely to be moderated by the enhanced supernova rate associated with
the Sun passing through galactic spiral arms (e.g. Leitch and Vasisht
1998; Shaviv, 2003; Gies and Helsel, 2005). This raises the intriguing
possibility that the record of GCR fluxes retained in the lunar regolith
might be able to help constrain models of the Galaxy’s spiral structure,
which is of inherent astronomical interest. Of particular interest from an
astrobiological point of view would be occurrences of nearby (≤ 8
parsecs) supernova explosions, which would be expected to result in
serious biological consequences (e.g. Gehrels et al., 2003). Fortunately,
such ‘point blank’ supernovae are unlikely to be encountered in every
spiral arm crossing: Gehrels et al. (2003) estimate that one may be
expected only every 1.5 Gyr or so, which is a time interval much better
matched to the lunar geological record than the terrestrial one. Identifying
spiral arm passages, and nearby supernovae explosions, from the
terrestrial biological and climate records is controversial because of the
ambiguity and sparseness of the data (see e.g. Rahmstorf et al, 2004), and
it is precisely in this respect that access to the longer duration, and almost
certainly better preserved, lunar GCR record would help.
On still shorter timescales (tens of Myr), additional variations in the GCR
flux may be expected owing to the oscillation of the solar orbit about the
plane of the Galaxy. Currently, the amplitude of this oscillation is about
70 parsecs, with a period of about 64 Myr (Gies and Helsel, 2005). At
first sight, one might expect a lower cosmic ray flux when the Sun is
located above or below the galactic plane, both because of the increased
distance from probable supernova sites in the plane and because the lower
density of the surrounding interstellar medium will cause the heliosphere
to expand and result in greater shielding of the inner Solar System (e.g.
Shaviv, 2003). However, Medvedev and Melott (2007) have recently
argued that, owing to the Galaxy’s motion through the local inter-galactic
medium, the Solar System is in fact exposed to an enhanced flux of
extragalactic cosmic rays when at the northern extremity of its
oscillations about the galactic plane. Medvedev and Melott (2007)
correlate this effect with an apparent 62±3 Myr periodicity in fossil
diversity (Rohde and Muller, 2005). They argue that biodiversity appears
lower when the extragalactic cosmic ray flux is highest (i.e. when the Sun
is well above the galactic plane), and that this correlation implies a causal
connection. As for the attempts to correlate terrestrial events with
supernova explosions and spiral arm passages described above,
confirming a direct link between variations in the cosmic ray flux and
evolutionary events on Earth requires access to a better record of the
former, and suitably preserved lunar regolith deposits may help in this
respect.
2.2 Accretion of gas and dust from interstellar clouds
Currently, the Sun lies within a very low density region of the interstellar
medium (with a hydrogen density, nH ~ 0.2 cm-3; e.g. Frisch et al., 2009).
However, during its orbit about the Galaxy, and especially during spiral
arm passages, it will have encountered much denser interstellar
environments (Talbot and Newman, 1977; Shaviv, 2003; Gies and Helsel,
2005). In addition to the enhanced supernova rate discussed above, this
raises the possibility that material from dense interstellar clouds might be
directly accreted onto the atmospheres and surfaces of terrestrial planets,
with possible biological consequences (e.g. Yabushita and Allen, 1989;
Pavlov et al., 2005; Yeghikyan and Fahr, 2006).
The principal effect of the Solar System entering a dense interstellar
cloud is for the heliosphere to shrink as the pressure of the solar wind
balances a higher external pressure (Yeghikyan and Fahr, 2006; Smith
and Scalo, 2009). In a review of this process, Yeghikyan and Fahr (2006)
found that for interstellar cloud densities of nH ≥1000 cm-3 the radius of
the heliosphere shrinks to less than 1 AU, leaving the Earth (and Moon)
directly exposed to interstellar material; a more recent study by Smith and
Scalo (2009) found a similar, but somewhat smaller, critical density of nH
≥ 600 cm-3. There is little doubt that the Solar System will have
encountered such interstellar clouds during its history, but estimates of
the associated timescales differ. Talbot and Newman (1977) estimated
that the Sun would encounter such clouds approximately every 300 Myr
on average, whereas Yeghikyan and Fahr (2006) obtained a comparable,
but somewhat longer, interval of 460 Myr. On the other hand, Scoville
and Sanders (1986) estimated much longer intervals (~ 1 Gyr) between
such encounters. This range is bracketed by the recent analysis of Smith
and Scalo (2009), who argued that based on current knowledge it is not
possible to determine the frequency of such encounters to better than an
order of magnitude, but that they probably occur somewhere between 100
Myr and 1 Gyr.
Pavlov et al. (2005) made a number of suggestions for trying to identify
such events in Earth’s geological record (for example by looking for non-
terrestrial 235U/238U ratios, where fresh interstellar material will have a
higher abundance of 235U owing to its continual production by
supernovae); Shaviv (2006) advanced a similar argument based on a
search for 244Pu. Given the likely distinctive chemical and isotopic
composition of interstellar dust, there would presumably be other
geochemical signatures for which one might search. The calculations of
Pavlov et al. (2005) imply that a ‘typical’ interstellar cloud crossing (nH ~
1000 cm-3 for 200,000 years) would deposit ~ 1 kg m-2 of interstellar dust
on exposed planetary surfaces. As for the other evidence of spiral arm
crossings discussed above, the stable surface of the Moon would seem
better suited to retaining such a record than the terrestrial one, especially
if the timescales involved turn out to be at the longer end of the range
identified by Smith and Scalo (2009).
In addition to the collection of interstellar dust, there is also the
possibility of identifying the gaseous component of the local interstellar
medium in lunar soils, perhaps as interstellar pickup ions (Wimmer-
Schweingruber and Bochsler, 2001). Note that, owing to the mechanism
of implantation, this is a record which will only be preserved in the
surficial regolith of an airless body such as the Moon. Wimmer-
Schweingruber and Bochsler (2001) have suggested that interstellar pick-
up ions may in fact already have been identified in lunar soils, although
more recently it has been argued that the isotopic profile originally
identified as such may actually be an artifact due the preferential
sputtering of the outer layers of the grains studied (e.g. Wieler et al.,
2006). Nevertheless, in principle interstellar pickup ions may still be
present within lunar regolith grains, albeit harder to identify than
originally thought (Wimmer-Schweingruber, personal communication). A
careful study of
local galactic
these would reveal much about
environment, including periods of dense cloud crossings and heliosphere
collapse.
From an astrobiological perspective, direct exposure of the Earth’s
atmosphere to an interstellar cloud with a density of nH ~ 1000 cm-3,
which would probably be sustained for several hundred thousand years,
would have a number of consequences for habitability. In particular, the
influx of hydrogen would alter atmospheric chemistry in such a way as to
deplete mesospheric ozone, and the resulting change in temperature
profile may lead to the formation of world-wide mesospheric clouds
leading to a global decrease in temperature (Yeghikyan and Fahr, 2006).
The direct accretion of interstellar dust could further increase atmospheric
opacity and contribute to additional cooling (Pavlov et al., 2005). In
addition, collapse of the heliosphere to within the Earth’s orbit would
lead to an increased GCR flux, with the additional consequences
discussed in Section 2.1 above.
Although the major astrobiological interest in the history of encounters
between the Solar System and dense interstellar clouds are the
consequences for planetary habitability, there are other possibilities. For
example, Napier (2007) has drawn attention to the possible role of dense
interstellar clouds in facilitating the transfer of life between planetary
systems (i.e. interstellar panspermia). Here, the suggestion is that life-
bearing meteorites ejected from planetary systems (e.g. Melosh, 2003)
may become concentrated within molecular clouds, from which they may
later be accreted by other planetary systems passing through the cloud.
Historical records of the Solar System’s own passages through such
clouds, and the composition of any interstellar dust collected, could
provide observational constraints on theories of this kind.
2.3 Variations of the impact cratering rate
In addition to experiencing variations in the intensity of ionizing radiation
and local interstellar densities, the Sun also experiences a changing
gravitational environment as it orbits the Galaxy. In particular, the
vertical oscillation above and below the plane, and passages through
spiral arms (with their attendant close passes to massive molecular
clouds) causes variations in the gravitational potential which may perturb
the orbits of comets in the Oort cloud and periodically increase the
cratering rate in the inner Solar System (e.g. Torbett, 1986; Clube and
Napier, 1986; Matese et al., 1995; Stothers, 1998; Leitch and
Vasisht, 1998). Such variations in the impact rate are of interest to
astrobiology because of their potential consequences for the habitability
of planetary surfaces. However, attempts to correlate the terrestrial
impact rate with variations in biodiversity are hampered by the relative
sparseness of the terrestrial impact record. The Moon, on the other hand,
retains an essentially complete record for impacts of all sizes over the
whole of Solar System history (e.g. Stöffler et al., 2006), making this the
most logical place to confirm or refute such correlations.
The lunar record will be particularly valuable in correlating variations in
impact rate with variations in cosmic ray intensity. Given sufficiently
wide-ranging sampling, the density of craters on well-dated surfaces will
yield the former, while the cosmic ray exposures of regoliths developed
on, or buried by, such surfaces will yield the latter. Some putative
galactic influences on the Solar System (e.g. spiral arm crossings; Leitch
and Vasisht, 1998) would predict a positive correlation between these
variables, while others (e.g. exposure to extra-galactic cosmic rays during
the Sun’s excursions above the plane; Medvedev and Melott, 2007)
would predict an anti-correlation (with a different period). Access to the
long-lived, and well-preserved, lunar records of both impact history and
cosmic-ray flux may be the only way to fully disentangle these competing
processes.
3. Palaeoregolith Deposits: Preserving a Record
We have argued here that the lunar surface, and especially the lunar
regolith, will contain a uniquely valuable record of the galactic
environment of the Sun, and that this record will be of importance to the
science of astrobiology (as well as galactic astronomy and heliospheric
physics). However, the present surficial regolith has been subject to
comminution and overturning (“gardening”) by meteorite impacts for the
last three to four Gyr, and the record it contains is therefore an average
over most of Solar System history. This will complicate the retrieval and
interpretation of any record it may contain (as also pointed out by
Wimmer-Schweingruber and Bochsler, 2001). From the point of view of
obtaining ancient records of solar system and galactic history it will be
most desirable to find ancient regoliths (palaeoregoliths) that have been
undisturbed since their formation.
A regolith forms when a fresh lunar surface is exposed to the flux of
micrometeorites. Most exposed mare surfaces date from between ~ 3.8
and 3.1 Gyr ago, with small-scale, geographically restricted volcanism
continuing to perhaps as recently as 1 Gyr ago (Hiesinger et al., 2003).
For example, the study by Hiesinger et al. (2003; cf. their Fig. 10) reveals
a patchwork of discrete lava flow units in Oceanus Procellarum with
individual ages ranging from about 3.5 to 1.2 Gyr ago. As younger lava
flows are superimposed on older ones, we may expect to find layers of
palaeoregoliths sandwiched between lava flows dating from within this
age range (see Fig. 1). As discussed by Crawford et al. (2007) and
Fagents et al. (2010), the archival value of such palaeoregoliths will be
enhanced by the fact that the under- and overlying basalt layers will lend
themselves to radiometric dating, thereby defining the age of the
geological record sandwiched between them.
A worthwhile geochemical record will only be preserved within a
palaeoregolith layer if it survives the thermal consequences of burial by
the initially molten overlying lava flow. In previous work (Fagents et al.,
2010) we have shown that, for lava flows ranging from 1 to 10 m
thickness,
implanted solar wind particles should be substantially
preserved in palaeoregoliths at depths of greater than 40 to 400 mm
beneath an overlying lava flow, respectively. The rate of regolith
accumulation varies as a function of exposed surface age (as the growing
regolith itself impedes further regolith development), and with absolute
age (owing to higher impact rates in the past). Horz et al. (1991) give
regolith growth rates in the range 1 to 5 mm Myr-1, where the lower value
is the current rate and the higher value refers to fresh basaltic surfaces
about 3.8 Gyr ago. A value of 2 mm Myr-1 would seem to be conservative
for fresh basalt surfaces over most of lunar history, which implies that
individual lava flows would have to remain exposed for between 20 and
200 Ma to accumulate regoliths in the thickness range required to
substantially shield implanted volatiles from an overlying lava flow. The
ages of individual basalt flows mapped by Hiesinger et al. (2003) indicate
that this is likely to have been a common occurrence.
For the purposes of this paper, we are primarily concerned with the
preservation of cosmic ray records (i.e. cosmogenic nuclei and radiation
tracks), interstellar pickup ions, and geochemical evidence for interstellar
dust particles, rather than the solar wind particles considered by Fagents
et al. (2010). However, it seems likely that in general these will be more
robust against thermal disruption than the solar wind particles. For
example, the interaction of cosmic rays with the regolith, and therefore
the production of cosmogenic nuclei, occurs at much deeper levels [i.e. of
the order of a meter; Vaniman et al. (1991), Goswami (2001)] than the
solar wind implantation (typically less than a micron). Moreover, with the
exception of 3He, most cosmogenic nuclei that might be used to measure
the cosmic ray flux [e.g. 21Ne, 38Ar, 83Kr and 126Xe; Goswami (2001),
Eugster (2003)] are relatively heavy and would therefore only be
expected to outgas at high temperatures (see Fig. 2 of Fagents et al.,
2010). We note that high energy GCRs are likely to pass through regolith
layers less than about a meter thick and penetrate the underlying bedrock,
but this will not affect the survival of a GCR-induced record provided
that the overlying regolith is sufficiently thick to attenuate the thermal
wave when the overlying lava flow is emplaced. Cosmic ray tracks would
also be expected to occur at depths greater than the likely penetration of
the thermal wave (although their sensitivity to thermal annealing remains
to be investigated). Any interstellar pickup ions (such as those tentatively
identified by Wimmer-Schweingruber and Bochsler, 2001), would be
expected to be found at depths comparable to the solar energetic particles
[i.e. on the order of mm; Vaniman et al. (1991), Goswami (2001)], and
are therefore likely to be less susceptible to thermal desorption than the
solar wind implanted ions. Finally, the thermal effects of an overlying
lava flow on the geochemical signature of accreted interstellar dust is not
known, but as such identification is unlikely to depend on the detection of
highly volatile substances there is no obvious reason to think that this
would be a serious obstacle.
Detailed studies of all these effects will be the topic of future work, but it
seems most likely that the galactic records to be found within lunar
palaeoregoliths will be no more, and probably significantly less,
susceptible to the thermal consequences of burial by lava flows than the
solar wind implanted particles discussed by Fagents et al. (2010).
4. Locating and Accessing Palaeoregolith Deposits
By definition, palaeoregolith deposits will be located below the surface,
although surface mapping of lava flows of different ages (e.g. Hiesinger
et al., 2003; Bugiolacchi et al., 2006; Hackwill, 2010) will help identify
areas where such deposits are likely to be found (see the maps presented
in these papers as a guide to likely locations). High-resolution imaging,
such as that being obtained with the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter
Camera (LROC; Robinson et al., 2010) will be especially valuable in this
respect (e.g. Crawford et al., 2009). Studies of areas where small impact
craters have excavated through overlying lava flows to reveal sub-surface
boundaries (e.g. Weider et al., 2010), and/or orbital ground penetrating
radar measurements (e.g. Ono et al., 2009), will help confirm the likely
occurrence of palaeoregolith layers and provide some information on
their depth and thickness.
Ultimately, we will need to identify specific localities where buried
palaeoregoliths may be accessible to future robotic or human exploration.
Note that, while LROC images may identify candidate palaeoregolith
outcrops in the walls of rilles or large craters, these are likely to be
relatively inaccessible. In addition, such outcrops are unlikely to yield
undisturbed palaeoregolith deposits; impact cratering, in particular, could
seriously disrupt the record we are seeking. Ideally, therefore, it would be
desirable to identify localities where modest drilling (e.g. to depths of a
few tens of meters) would permit access to undisturbed palaeoregolith
deposits. Although initial exploratory sampling might be achieved
robotically, we argue that gaining full access to the lunar palaeoregolith
record (as for other areas of lunar exploration) would be greatly
facilitated by a renewed human presence on the lunar surface.
The requirements of an exploration architecture able to locate and access
lunar palaeoregolith deposits has been outlined by Crawford et al. (2007),
and, briefly, would consist of the following elements:
• The ability to conduct ‘sortie-class’ expeditions to a range of
localities on the lunar surface;
• Provision for surface mobility – in the specific case of the
Procellarum basalt flows mapped by Hiesinger et al. (2003), a
range of order 250 km would permit access to a number of
different units with a wide range of ages. In the context of a human
mission this implies provision of a pressurized rover;
• Provision of the means to detect sub-surface palaeoregolith
deposits. A rover-borne ground penetrating radar system (e.g.
Heggy et al., 2009) would be a suitable means of achieving this;
• Provision of a drilling capability, perhaps to ~ 100 m depths (for a
review of suitable planetary drilling technology see Zacny et al.,
2006). This also implies provision for storage and transport of the
resulting drill cores; and
• Adequate provision for sample collection and return capacity
(roughly estimated at several 100 kg per sortie).
5. Conclusions
Lunar palaeoregolith deposits potentially contain important records of the
evolution of the Sun, and its galactic environment, throughout most of
Solar System history (approximately 20 revolutions of the Galaxy). In
particular, palaeoregoliths likely contain records of variations in the
cosmic ray flux, energetic galactic events (e.g, supernovae and gamma-
ray bursts), and passages of the Solar System through dense interstellar
clouds. Much of this record is of astrobiological interest as these
processes may have affected the evolution of life on Earth, and perhaps
other Solar System bodies. Locating and sampling such palaeoregolith
deposits will be an important objective of future lunar exploration
activities. As this will require extensive field excursions, probably
combined with sub-surface drilling, we argue that it would be greatly
facilitated by a renewed human presence on the Moon
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Robert Wimmer-Schweingruber for helpful
correspondence regarding the possibility of identifying interstellar pickup
ions in lunar regolith grains, and two anonymous referees for helpful
comments. SAF and MER acknowledge support from the NASA Lunar
Advanced Science and Exploration Research (LASER) program through
grant NNX08AY75G and NSF-GRFP.
J. Annis, An astrophysical explanation for the great silence. J. Brit.
Interplanet. Soc., 52, 19-22, (1999).
J.C. Armstrong, L.E. Wells, G. Gonzales, Rummaging through the
Earth’s attic for remains of ancient life. Icarus, 160, 183-196, (2002).
D.R. Brilliant, I.A. Franchi, J.W. Arden, C.T. Pillinger, An interstellar
component in the lunar regolith. Meteoritics, 27, 206, (1992).
R. Bugiolacchi, P.D. Spudis, J.E. Guest, Stratigraphy and composition
of lava flows in Mare Nubium and Mare Cognitum . Meteoritic.
Planet. Sci., 41, 285-304, (2006).
References
S.V.M. Clube, W.M. Napier, Giant comets and the Galaxy: implications
of the terrestrial record. In: R. Smoluchowski, J.N. Bahcall, M.S.
Matthews (eds.) The Galaxy and the Solar System, (University of
Arizona Press, Tucson, 1986); pp 260-285.
I.A. Crawford, The astrobiological case for renewed robotic and human
exploration of the Moon. Internat. J. Astrobiol., 5, 191–199, (2006).
I.A. Crawford, S.A. Fagents, K.H. Joy, Full Moon exploration:
exploring the basaltic lava flows of Oceanus Procellarum - valuable
(non-polar) lunar science facilitated by a return to the Moon. Astron.
Geophys., 48, 3.18-3.21, (2007).
I.A. Crawford, E.C. Baldwin, E.A. Taylor, J.A. Bailey, K. Tsembelis,
On the survivability and detectability of terrestrial meteorites on the
Moon. Astrobiology 8, 242–252, (2008).
I.A. Crawford, K.H. Joy, S.A. Fagents, M.E. Rumpf, The importance of
lunar palaeoregolith deposits and the role of Lunar Reconnaissance
Orbiter. Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Science Targeting Meeting,
Tempe, Arizona, LPI Contribution No. 1483, p.29, (2009).
G. Crozaz, G. Poupeau, R.M. Walker, E. Zinner and D.A. Morrison,
The record of solar and galactic radiations in the ancient lunar
regolith and their implications for the early history of the Sun and
Moon. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc., A285, 587-592, (1977).
L. Dartnell, Ionising radiation and life. Astrobiology (in press, 2010).
O. Eugster, Cosmic-ray exposure ages of meteorites and lunar rocks and
their significance. Chemie der Erde, 63, 3-30, (2003).
S.A. Fagents, M.E. Rumpf, I.A. Crawford, K.H. Joy, Preservation
potential of implanted solar wind volatiles in lunar paleoregolith
deposits buried by lava flows. Icarus, 207, 595-604, (2010).
F. Ferrari, E. Szuszkiewicz, Cosmic rays: a review for astrobiologists.
Astrobiology, 9, 413-436, (2009).
P.C. Frisch, M. Bzowski, E. Grün, V. Izmodenov, H. Krüger, J.L.
Linsky, D.J. McComas, E. Möbius, S. Redfield, N. Schwadron, R.
Shelton, J.D. Slavin, B.E. Wood, The galactic environment of the
Sun: interstellar material inside and outside of the heliosphere. Space
Sci. Rev., 146, 235-273, (2009).
N. Gehrels, C.M. Laird, C.H. Jackman, J.K. Cannizzo, B.J. Mattson, W.
Chen, Ozone depletion from nearby supernovae. Astrophys. J., 585,
1169-1176, (2003).
D.R. Gies, J.W. Helsel, Ice age epochs and the Sun’s path through the
Galaxy. Astrophys. J., 626, 844-848, (2005).
J.N. Goswami, Interactions of energetic particles and dust grains with
asteroidal surfaces. Earth Planets and Space, 53, 1029-1037, (2001).
J.L. Gutiérrez, Terrane meteorites on the Moon: relevance for the study
of the origin of life in the Earth. Proceedings of the Second
European Workshop on Exo/Astrobiology, ESA SP-518, 187-191,
(2002).
T. Hackwill, Stratigraphy, evolution, and volume of basalts in Mare
Serenitatis. Meteorit. Planet. Sci., 45, 210-219, (2010).
E. Heggy, T. Fong, D.A. Kring, M. Deans, A. Anglade, K. Mahiouz, M.
Bualat, P. Lee, F. Horz, W. Bluethmann, Potential of probing the
lunar regolith using rover-mounted ground penetrating radar: Moses
Lake dune field analog study. 40th Lunar and Planetary Science
Conference, 2183, (2009).
H. Hiesinger, J.W. Head, U. Wolf, R. Jaumann, G. Neukum, Ages and
stratigraphy of mare basalts in Oceanus Procellarum, Mare Nubium,
Mare Cognitum, and Mare Insularum. J. Geophys. Res., 108, E7,
5065, (2003).
F. Horz, R. Grieve, G.H. Heiken, P.D. Spudis, A. Binder, Lunar surface
processes. In: G.H. Heiken, D.T. Vaniman, B.M. French (eds.) The
Lunar Sourcbook, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 1991);
pp. 61-120.
B.L. Jolliff, R.L. Korotev, N.L. Haskin, A. 1993. An iridium-rich iron
micrometeorite with silicate inclusions from the Moon. 24th Lunar
and Planetary Science Conference, 729, (1993).
J.F. Kerridge, P. Signer, R. Wieler, R.H. Becker, R.O. Pepin, Long-term
changes in composition of solar particles implanted in extraterrestrial
materials. In: C.P. Sonett, M.S. Giampapa, M.S. Matthews, (Eds.)
The Sun in Time (University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 1991); pp.
98–117.
J. Kirby, K.S. Carslaw, Variations of galactic cosmic rays and the
Earth’s climate. In: P.C. Frisch (ed.) Solar Journey: The Significance
of our Galactic Environment for the Heliosphere and Earth,
(Springer, Dordrecht, 2006); pp 349-397.
E.M. Leitch, G. Vasisht, Mass extinctions and the sun's encounters with
spiral arms. New Astronomy, 3, 51-56, (1998).
P.G. Lucey, et al., Understanding the lunar surface and space-Moon
interaction. In: New Views of the Moon, Rev. Min. Geochem. 60,
82–219, (2006).
J.J. Matese, P.G. Whitman, K.A. Innanen, M.J. Valtonen, Periodic
modulation of the Oort cloud comet flux by the adiabatically
changing galactic tide. Icarus, 116, 255-268, (1995).
D. McKay, G. Heiken, A. Basu, G. Blanford, S. Simon, R. Reedy, B.
French, J. Papike, The lunar regolith. In: G. Heiken, D. Vaniman, B.
French, (eds) The Lunar Sourcebook (Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 1991); pp 285–356.
H.Y. McSween, A new type of chondritic meteorite found in lunar soil.
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 31, 193-199, (1976).
M.V. Medvedev, A.L. Melott, A.L., Do extragalactic cosmic rays
induce cycles in fossil diversity? Astrophys. J., 664, 879-889,
(2007).
H.J. Melosh, Exchange of meteorites (and life?) between stellar
systems. Astrobiology, 3, 207-215, (2003).
W.M. Napier, Pollination of exoplanets by nebulae, Internat. J.
Astrobiology, 6, 223-228, (2007).
T. Ono et al., Lunar Radar Sounder observations of subsurface layers
under the nearside maria of the Moon. Science, 323, 90-92, (2009).
M. Ozima, K. Seki, N. Terada, Y.N. Miura, F.A. Podosek, M.
Shinagawa, M., Terrestrial nitrogen and noble gases in lunar soils.
Nature, 436, 655–659, (2005).
M. Ozima, M., Q.-Z Yin, F.A. Podosek, Y.N. Miura, Toward
prescription for approach from terrestrial noble gas and light element
records in lunar soils understanding early Earth evolution. Proc. Nat.
Acad. Sci., 105, 17654–17658, (2008).
A.A. Pavlov, O.B. Toon, A.K. Pavlov, J. Bally, D. Pollard, Passing
through a giant molecular cloud: snowball glaciations produced by
interstellar dust. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L03705-L03708, (2005).
S. Rahmstorf, D. Archer, D.S. Ebel, O. Eugster, J. Jouzel, D. Maraun,
U. Neu, G.A. Schmidt, J. Severinghaus, A.J. Weaver, J. Zachos,
Cosmic rays, carbon dioxide, and climate. Eos, 85, 38-41, (2004).
M.S. Robinson, et al., Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC)
Instrument Overview. Space Sci. Rev., 150, 81-124, (2010).
R.A. Rohde, R.A. Muller, Cycles in fossil diversity. Nature, 434, 208-
210, (2005).
A.E. Rubin, The Hadley Rille enstatite chondrite and its agglutinate-like
rim: impact melting during accretion to the Moon. Meteorit. Planet.
Sci, 32, 135-141, (1997).
J. Scalo, J.C. Wheeler, Astrophysical and astrobiological implications
of gamma-ray burst properties. Astrophys. J., 566, 723-737, (2002).
K. Scherer, et al., Interstellar-terrestrial relations: variable cosmic
environments, the dynamic heliosphere, and their imprints on
terrestrial archives and climate. Space Sci. Rev., 127, 327-465,
(2006).
N.Z. Scoville, D.B. Sanders, Observational constraints on
the
interaction of giant molecular clouds with the solar system. In: R.
Smoluchowski, J.N. Bahcall, M.S. Matthews (eds.) The Galaxy and
the Solar System, (University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 1986); pp
69-82.
N.J. Shaviv, Long-term variations in the galactic environment of the
Sun. In: P.C. Frisch (ed.) Solar Journey: The Significance of our
Galactic Environment for the Heliosphere and Earth, (Springer,
Dordrecht, 2006); pp 99-131.
D.S. Smith, J.M. Scalo, Habitable zones exposed: astrosphere collapse
frequency as a function of stellar mass. Astrobiology, 9, 673-681,
(2009).
P.D. Spudis, The Once and Future Moon. Smithsonian Institution Press,
Washington, DC. (1996), 308 pp.
D. Stöffler, Cratering History and Lunar Chronology. In: New Views of
the Moon, Rev. Min. Geochem. 60, 519–596, (2006).
R.B. Stothers, Galactic disc dark matter, terrestrial impact cratering and
the law of large numbers. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 300, 1098-
1104, (1998).
R.J. Talbot, M.J. Newman, Encounters between stars and dense
interstellar clouds. Astrophys. J. Suppl., 34, 295-308, (1977).
B.C. Thomas, Gamma-ray bursts as a threat to life on Earth. Internat. J.
Astrobiology, 8, 183-186, (2009).
S.E. Thorsett, Terrestrial implications of cosmological gamma-ray burst
models. Astrophys. J., 444, L53-L55, (1995).
M.V. Torbett, Dynamical influence of galactic tides and molecular
clouds on the Oort cloud of comets. In: R. Smoluchowski, J.N.
Bahcall, M.S. Matthews (eds.) The Galaxy and the Solar System,
(University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 1986); pp 147-172.
D. Vaniman, R. Reedy, G. Heiken, G. Olhoeft, W. Mendell, The lunar
environment. In: G. Heiken, D. Vaniman, B. French, (eds) The
Lunar Sourcebook (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991);
pp 27-60.
S.Z. Weider, I.A. Crawford, K.H. Joy, Individual lava flow thicknesses
in Oceanus Procellarum and Mare Serenitatis determined from
Clementine multi-spectral data. Icarus (in press, 2010).
R. Wieler, K. Kehm, A.P. Meshik, C.M. Hohenberg, Secular changes in
the xenon and krypton abundances in the solar wind recorded in
single lunar grains. Nature, 384, 46–49, (1996).
R. Wieler, A. Grimberg, V.S. Heber, What are the consequences if the
“SEP” solar noble gas component does not exist? Meteorit. Planet.
Sci., 41, A188, (2006).
R.F. Wimmer-Schweingruber, P. Bochsler, Lunar soils: a long-term
archive for the galactic environment of the heliosphere? AIP
Conference Proceedings, 598, 399-404, (2001).
S. Yabushita, A.J. Allen, On the effect of accreted interstellar matter on
the terrestrial environment. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 238, 1465-
1478, (1989).
A. Yeghikyan, Fahr, H., Accretion of interstellar material into the
heliosphere and onto Earth. In: P.C. Frisch (ed.) Solar Journey: The
Significance of our Galactic Environment for the Heliosphere and
Earth, (Springer, Dordrecht, 2006); pp 317-348.
K. Zacny, Y. Bar-Cohen,M. Brennan, G. Briggs, G. Cooper, K. Davis,
B. Dolgin, D. Glaser, B. Glass, S. Gorevan, J. Guerrero, C. McKay,
G. Paulsen, S. Stanley, C. Stoker, Drilling systems
for
extraterrestrial subsurface exploration. Astrobiology, 8, 665-706,
(2008).
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the formation of a palaeoregolith
layer: (1) a new lava flow is emplaced and meteorite impacts immediately
begin to develop a surficial regolith; (2) solar wind particles, galactic
cosmic-rays, and “exotic” material derived from elsewhere on the Moon
(and perhaps elsewhere, such as the early Earth) are implanted; (3) the
regolith layer, with its embedded historical record, is buried by a more
recent lava flow, forming a palaeoregolith; (4) the process begins again
on the upper surface. (Image reproduced from Crawford et al. (2007) with
permission; © Royal Astronomical Society).
|
1902.06018 | 3 | 1902 | 2019-04-23T08:38:43 | An alternative interpretation of the exomoon candidate signal in the combined Kepler and Hubble data of Kepler-1625 | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | Kepler and Hubble photometry of a total of four transits by the Jupiter-sized Kepler-1625b have recently been interpreted to show evidence of a Neptune-sized exomoon. The profound implications of this first possible exomoon detection and the physical oddity of the proposed moon, that is, its giant radius prompt us to re-examine the data and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) used for detection. We combine the Kepler data with the previously published Hubble light curve. In an alternative approach, we perform a synchronous polynomial detrending and fitting of the Kepler data combined with our own extraction of the Hubble photometry. We generate five million MCMC realizations of the data with both a planet-only model and a planet-moon model and compute the BIC difference (DeltaBIC) between the most likely models, respectively. DeltaBIC values of -44.5 (using previously published Hubble data) and -31.0 (using our own detrending) yield strongly support the exomoon interpretation. Most of our orbital realizations, however, are very different from the best-fit solutions, suggesting that the likelihood function that best describes the data is non-Gaussian. We measure a 73.7min early arrival of Kepler-1625b for its Hubble transit at the 3 sigma level, possibly caused by a 1 day data gap near the first Kepler transit, stellar activity, or unknown systematics. The radial velocity amplitude of a possible unseen hot Jupiter causing Kepler-1625b's transit timing variation could be some 100m/s. Although we find a similar solution to the planet-moon model as previously proposed, careful consideration of its statistical evidence leads us to believe that this is not a secure exomoon detection. Unknown systematic errors in the Kepler/Hubble data make the DeltaBIC an unreliable metric for an exomoon search around Kepler-1625b, allowing for alternative interpretations of the signal. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | Astronomy & Astrophysics submitted
April 24, 2019
c(cid:13)ESO 2019
An alternative interpretation of the exomoon candidate signal
in the combined Kepler and Hubble data of Kepler-1625
René Heller1, Kai Rodenbeck2, 1, and Giovanni Bruno3
1 Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
[email protected], [email protected]
2 Institute for Astrophysics, Georg August University Göttingen, Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
3 INAF, Astrophysical Observatory of Catania, Via S. Sofia 78, 95123 Catania, Italy, [email protected]
9
1
0
2
r
p
A
3
2
.
]
P
E
h
p
-
o
r
t
s
a
[
3
v
8
1
0
6
0
.
2
0
9
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
Received 18 December 2018; Accepted 25 February 2019
ABSTRACT
Context. Kepler and Hubble photometry of a total of four transits by the Jupiter-sized exoplanet Kepler-1625 b have recently been
interpreted to show evidence of a Neptune-sized exomoon. The key arguments were an apparent drop in stellar brightness after the
planet's October 2017 transit seen with Hubble and its 77.8 min early arrival compared to a strictly periodic orbit.
Aims. The profound implications of this first possible exomoon detection and the physical oddity of the proposed moon, i.e., its giant
radius prompt us to examine the planet-only hypothesis for the data and to investigate the reliability of the Bayesian information
criterion (BIC) used for detection.
Methods. We combined Kepler's Pre-search Data Conditioning Simple Aperture Photometry (PDCSAP) with the previously pub-
lished Hubble light curve. In an alternative approach, we performed a synchronous polynomial detrending and fitting of the Kepler
data combined with our own extraction of the Hubble photometry. We generated five million parallel-tempering Markov chain Monte
Carlo (PTMCMC) realizations of the data with both a planet-only model and a planet-moon model, and compute the BIC difference
(∆BIC) between the most likely models, respectively.
Results. The ∆BIC values of −44.5 (using previously published Hubble data) and −31.0 (using our own detrending) yield strong
statistical evidence in favor of an exomoon. Most of our orbital realizations, however, are very different from the best-fit solutions,
suggesting that the likelihood function that best describes the data is non-Gaussian. We measure a 73.7 min early arrival of Kepler-
1625 b for its Hubble transit at the 3 σ level. This deviation could be caused by a 1 d data gap near the first Kepler transit, stellar
activity, or unknown systematics, all of which affect the detrending. The radial velocity amplitude of a possible unseen hot Jupiter
causing the Kepler-1625 b transit timing variation could be approximately 100 m s−1.
Conclusions. Although we find a similar solution to the planet-moon model to that previously proposed, careful consideration of its
statistical evidence leads us to believe that this is not a secure exomoon detection. Unknown systematic errors in the Kepler/Hubble
data make the ∆BIC an unreliable metric for an exomoon search around Kepler-1625 b, allowing for alternative interpretations of the
signal.
Key words. eclipses -- methods: data analysis -- planets and satellites: detection -- planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and
stability -- planets and satellites: individual: Kepler-1625 b -- techniques: photometric
1. Introduction
The recent discovery of an exomoon candidate around the
transiting Jupiter-sized object Kepler-1625 b orbiting a slightly
evolved solar mass star (Teachey et al. 2018) came as a sur-
prise to the exoplanet community. This Neptune-sized exomoon,
if confirmed, would be unlike any moon in the solar system, it
would have an estimated mass that exceeds the total mass of all
moons and rocky planets of the solar system combined. It is cur-
rently unclear how such a giant moon could have formed (Heller
2018).
Rodenbeck et al. (2018) revisited the three transits obtained
with the Kepler space telescope between 2009 and 2013 and
found marginal statistical evidence for the proposed exomoon.
Their transit injection-retrieval tests into the out-of-transit Ke-
pler data of the host star also suggested that the exomoon could
well be a false positive. A solution to the exomoon question was
supposed to arrive with the new Hubble data of an October 2017
transit of Kepler-1625 b (Teachey & Kipping 2018).
The new evidence for the large exomoon by Teachey & Kip-
ping (2018), however, remains controversial. On the one hand,
the Hubble transit light curve indeed shows a significant de-
crease in stellar brightness that can be attributed to the previ-
ously suggested moon. Perhaps more importantly, the transit of
Kepler-1625 b occurred 77.8 min earlier than expected from a se-
quence of strictly periodic transits, which is in very good agree-
ment with the proposed transit of the exomoon candidate, which
occurred before the planetary transit. On the other hand, an up-
grade of Kepler's Science Operations Center pipeline from ver-
sion 9.0 to version 9.3 caused the exomoon signal that was pre-
sented in the Simple Aperture Photometry (SAP) measurements
in the discovery paper (Teachey et al. 2018) to essentially van-
ish in the SAP flux used in the new study of Teachey & Kip-
ping (2018). This inconsistency, combined with the findings of
Rodenbeck et al. (2018) that demonstrate that the characteriza-
tion and statistical evidence for this exomoon candidate depend
strongly on the methods used for data detrending, led us to revisit
the exomoon interpretation in light of the new Hubble data.
Article number, page 1 of 8
A&A submitted
Here we address two questions. How unique is the pro-
posed orbital solution of the planet-moon system derived with
the Bayesian information criterion (BIC)? What could be the rea-
son for the observed 77.8 min difference in the planetary transit
timing other than an exomoon?
2. Methods
Our first goal was to fit the combined Kepler and Hubble data
with our planet-moon transit model (Rodenbeck et al. 2018)
and to derive the statistical likelihood for the data to represent
the model. In brief, we first model the orbital dynamics of the
star-planet-moon system using a nested approach, in which the
planet-moon orbit is Keplerian and unperturbed by the stellar
gravity. The transit model consists of two black circles, one
for the planet and one for the moon, that pass in front of the
limb-darkened stellar disk. The resulting variations in the stellar
brightness are computed using Ian Crossfield's python code of
the Mandel & Agol (2002) analytic transit model.1 The entire
model contains 16 free parameters and it features three major
updates compared to Rodenbeck et al. (2018): (1) Planet-moon
occultations are now correctly simulated, (2) the planet's motion
around the local planet-moon barycenter is taken into account,
and (3) inclinations between the circumstellar orbit of the planet-
moon barycenter and the planet-moon orbit are now included.
We used the emcee code2 of Foreman-Mackey et al. (2013)
to generate Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) realizations of
our planet-only model (M0) and planet-moon model (M1) and
to derive posterior probability distributions of the set of model
parameters ( #»
θ ). We tested both a standard MCMC sampling
with 100 walkers and a parallel-tempering ensemble MCMC
(PTMCMC) with five temperatures, each of which has 100 walk-
ers. As we find a better convergence rate for the PTMCMC sam-
pling, we use it in the following. Moreover, PTMCMC can sam-
ple both the parameter space at large and in regions with tight
peaks of the likelihood function. The PTMCMC sampling is al-
lowed to walk five million steps.
The resulting model light curves are referred to as Fi(t,
θ ),
where t are the time stamps of the data points from Kepler and
Hubble (N measurements in total), for which time-uncorrelated
standard deviations σ j at times t j are assumed, following the
suggestion of Teachey & Kipping (2018). This simplifies the
joint probability density of the observed (and detrended) flux
measurements (F(t)) to the product of the individual probabil-
ities for each data point,
#»
N(cid:89)
j=1
1(cid:113)
2πσ2
j
exp
(cid:16)
−
p(F #»
θ ,Mi) =
(cid:17)2
.
F(t j) − Fi(t j,
2σ2
j
#»
θ )
(1)
We then determined the set of parameters ( #»
θ max) that maxi-
mizes the joint probability density function (p(F #»
θ max,Mi)) for
a given light curve F(t j) and model Mi and calculated the BIC
(Schwarz 1978)
θ max,Mi) .
BIC(MiF) = mi ln N − 2 ln p(F #»
The advantage of the BIC in comparison to χ2 minimization, for
example, is in its relation to the number of model parameters
1 Available at www.astro.ucla.edu/∼ianc/files
2 Available at http://dfm.io/emcee/current/user/pt
(2)
Article number, page 2 of 8
(mi) and data points. The more free parameters in the model,
the stronger the weight of the first penalty term in Eq. (2),
thereby mitigating the effects of overfitting. Details of the ac-
tual computer code implementation or transit simulations aside,
this Bayesian framework is essentially what the Hunt for Exo-
moons with Kepler survey used to identify and rank exomoon
candidates (Kipping et al. 2012), which ultimately led to the de-
tection of the exomoon candidate around Kepler-1625 b after its
first detection via the orbital sampling effect (Heller 2014; Heller
et al. 2016a).
2.1. Data preparation
In a first step, we used Kepler's Pre-search Data Conditioning
Simple Aperture Photometry (PDCSAP) and the Hubble Wide
Field Camera 3 (WFC3) light curve as published by Teachey &
Kipping (2018) based on their quadratic detrending. Then we
executed our PTMCMC fitting and derived the ∆BIC values and
the posterior parameter distributions.
In a second step, we did our own extraction of the Hubble
light curve including an exponential ramp correction for each
Hubble orbit. Then we performed the systematic trend correc-
tion together with the transit fit of a planet-moon model. Our
own detrending of the light curves is not a separate step, but it is
integral to the fitting procedure. For each calculation of the like-
lihood, we find the best fitting detrending curve by dividing the
observed light curve by the transit model and by fitting a third-
order polynomial to the resulting light curve. Then we remove
the trend from the original light curve by dividing it through the
best-fit detrending polynomial and evaluate the likelihood. We
also performed a test in which the detrending parameters were
free PTMCMC model parameters and found similar results for
the parameter distributions but at a much higher computational
cost. We note that the resulting maximum likelihood is (and must
be) the same by definition if the PTMCMC sampling converges.
Kepler-1625 was observed by Hubble under the GO program
15149 (PI Teachey). The observations were secured from Oc-
tober 28 to 29, 2017, to cover the ∼ 20 hr transit plus several
hours of out-of-transit stellar flux (Teachey & Kipping 2018).
The F130N filter of WFC3 was used to obtain a single direct
image of the target, while 232 spectra were acquired with the
G141 grism spanning a wavelength range from 1.1 to 1.7 µm.
Due to the faintness of the target, it was observed in staring mode
(e.g. Berta et al. 2012; Wilkins et al. 2014) unlike the most re-
cent observations of brighter exoplanet host stars, which were
monitored in spatial scanning mode (McCullough & MacKenty
2012). Hence, instead of using the IMA files as an intermediate
product, we analyzed the FLT files, which are the final output
of the calwfc3 pipeline of Hubble and allow a finer manipula-
tion of the exposures during consecutive nondestructive reads.
Each FLT file contains measurements between about 100 and
300 electrons per second, with exposure times of about 291 sec-
onds.
We used the centroid of the stellar image to calculate the
wavelength calibration, adopting the relations of Pirzkal et al.
(2016). For each spectroscopic frame, we first rejected the pix-
els flagged by calwfc3 as "bad detector pixels", pixels with un-
stable response, and those with uncertain flux value (Data Qual-
ity condition 4, 32, or 512). Then we corrected each frame with
the flat field file available on the Space Telescope Science Insti-
tute (STScI) website3 by following the prescription of the WFC3
3 www.stsci.edu/hst/wfc3/analysis/grism_obs/calibrations/
wfc3_g141.html
René Heller et al.: Alternative explanations for the exomoon interpretation for Kepler-1625
Before performing the PTMCMC optimization, we removed
the first Hubble orbit from the data set and the first data point
of each Hubble orbit, as they are affected by stronger instrumen-
tal effects than the other observations (Deming et al. 2013) and
cannot be corrected with the same systematics model. We also
removed the last point of the 12th, 13th, and 14th Hubble or-
bit since they were affected by the passage of the South Atlantic
Anomaly (as highlighted in the proposal file, available on the
STScI website).
2.2. Proposed unseen planet
2.2.1. Mass-orbit constraints for a close-in planet
According to Teachey et al. (2018), the 2017 Hubble transit of
Kepler-1625 b occurred about 77.8 min earlier than predicted, an
effect that could be astrophysical in nature and is referred to as
a transit timing variation (TTV). As proposed by Teachey et al.
(2018), this TTV could either be interpreted as evidence for an
exomoon or it could indicate the presence of a hitherto unseen
additional planet. Various planetary configurations can cause the
observed TTV effect such as an inner planet or an outer planet.
At this point, no stellar radial velocity measurements of Kepler-
1625 exist that could be used to search for additional nontransit-
ing planets in this system.
In the following, we focus on the possibility of an inner
planet with a much smaller orbital period than Kepler-1625 b
simply because it would have interesting observational conse-
quences. We use the approximation of Agol et al. (2005) for the
TTV amplitude (δt) due to a close inner planet, which would
impose a periodic variation on the position of the star, and solve
their expression for the mass of the inner planet (Mp,in) as a func-
tion of its orbital semimajor axis (ap,in),
Mp,in = δt M(cid:63)
ap,out
ap,in Pp,out
,
(3)
where aout = 0.87 AU is the semimajor axis of Kepler-1625 b.
The validity of this expression is restricted to coplanar systems
without significant planet-planet interaction and with aout(cid:29)ain,
so that TTVs are only caused by the reflex motion of the star
around its barycenter with the inner planet.
As we show in Sect. 3.2, the proposed inner planet could be a
hot Jupiter. The transits of a Jupiter-sized planet, however, would
be visible in the Kepler data. As a consequence, we can esti-
mate the minimum orbital inclination (i) between Kepler-1625 b
and the suspected planet to prevent the latter from showing tran-
sits. This angle is given as per i = arctan(R(cid:63)/ap,in) and we use
R(cid:63) = 1.793+0.263
−0.488 R(cid:12) (Mathur et al. 2017).
2.2.2. Orbital stability
We can exclude certain masses and orbital semimajor axes for
an unseen inner planet based on the criterion of mutual Hill sta-
bility. This instability region depends to some extent on the un-
known mass of Kepler-1625 b. Mass estimates can be derived
from a star-planet-moon model, but these estimates are irrelevant
if the observed TTVs are due to an unseen planetary perturber.
Hence, we assume a nominal Jupiter mass (MJup) for Kepler-
1625 b.
The Hill sphere of a planet with an orbital semimajor
axis ap around a star with mass M(cid:63) can be estimated as
RH = ap(Mp/[3M(cid:63)])1/3, which suggests RH = 125 RJup for
Article number, page 3 of 8
Fig. 1. Top: Example of a WFC3 exposure of Kepler-1625. The abscissa
shows the column pixel prior to wavelength calibration. The yellow box
indicates the region used for background estimation. The spectrum of
Kepler-1625 is at the center of the frame, around row 150 in the spatial
direction, while several contaminant sources are evident in other regions
of the detector. The color bar illustrates the measured charge values.
Bottom: Background value measured across the rows of the same frame.
online manual. We performed the background subtraction on a
column-by-column basis. Due to a number of contaminant stars
in the observation field (Fig. 1, top panel), we carefully selected
a region on the detector that was as close as possible to the spec-
trum of Kepler-1625, close to row 150 in spatial dimension, and
far from any contaminant. For each column on the detector, we
applied a 5 σ clipping to reject the outliers and then calculated
the median background flux value in that column. Following
STScI prescriptions, we also removed pixels with an electron-
per-second count larger than 5. An example for the background
behavior is shown in the bottom panel of Fig. 1.
We inspected each frame with the image registration
package (Baker & Matthews 2001) to search drifts in both axes
of the detector with respect to the very last frame, and then ex-
tracted the spectrum of Kepler-1625 by performing optimal ex-
traction (Horne 1986) on the detector rows containing the stel-
lar flux. This procedure automatically removes bad pixels and
cosmic rays from the frames by correcting them with a smooth-
ing function. We started the extraction with an aperture of a few
pixels centered on the peak of the stellar trace and gradually in-
creased its extension by one pixel per side on the spatial direction
until the flux dispersion reached a minimum.
We performed another outlier rejection by stacking all the
one-dimensional spectra along the time axis. We computed a
median-filtered version of the stellar flux at each wavelength
bin and performed a 3 σ clipping between the computed flux
and the median filter. Finally, we summed the stellar flux across
all wavelength bins from 1.115 to 1.645 µm to obtain the band-
integrated stellar flux corresponding to each exposure.
spatial directionelectrons / selectrons / s1.51.41.31.21.11.00.95075100125150175200225wavelength (uncalibrated)50010015020025010080604020 0-20-40 A&A submitted
Fig. 2. Orbital solutions for Kepler-1625 b and its suspected exomoon based on the combined Kepler and Hubble data. (a,b,c) Kepler PDCSAP flux
and (d) the quadratic detrending of the Hubble data from Teachey & Kipping (2018). The blue curves show 1 000 realizations of our PTMCMC
fitting of a planet-moon model. Our most likely solution (red line) is very similar to the one found by Teachey & Kipping (2018), but differs
significantly from the one initially found by Teachey et al. (2018). (e,f,g) Kepler PDCSAP flux and (h) our own detrending of the Hubble light
curve (in parallel to the fitting). The ingress and egress of the model moon are denoted with arrows and labels in panel h as an example.
Kepler-1625 b. We calculate the Hill radius of the proposed in-
ner planet accordingly, and identify the region in the mass-
semimajor axis diagram of the inner planet that would lead to
an overlap of the Hill spheres and therefore to orbital instability.
3. Results
3.1. PTMCMC sampling and ∆BIC
Regarding the combined data set of the Kepler and Hubble data
as detrended by Teachey & Kipping (2018), we find a ∆BIC of
−44.5 between the most likely planet-only and the most likely
planet-moon solution. A combination of the Kepler and Hubble
light curves based on our own extraction of the WFC3 data yields
a ∆BIC of −31.0. Formally speaking, both of these two values
can be interpreted as strong statistical evidence for an exomoon
interpretation. The two values are very different, however, which
suggests that the detrending of the Hubble data has a significant
effect on the exomoon interpretation. In other words, this illus-
trates that the systematics are not well-modeled and poorly un-
derstood.
In Fig. 2a-d, we show our results for the PTMCMC fit-
ting of our planet-moon model to the four transits of Kepler-
1625 b including the Hubble data as extracted and detrended by
Teachey & Kipping (2018) using a quadratic fit. Although our
most likely solution shows some resemblance to the one pro-
posed by Teachey & Kipping (2018), we find that several aspects
are different. As an example, the second Kepler transit (Fig. 2b)
is fitted best without a significant photometric moon signature,
that is to say, the moon does not pass in front of the stellar disk4,
whereas the corresponding best-fit model of Teachey & Kipping
(2018) shows a clear dip prior to the planetary transit (see their
Fig. 4). What is more, most of our orbital solutions (blue lines)
differ substantially from the most likely solution (red line). In
other words, the orbital solutions do not converge and various
4 Martin et al. (2019) estimate that failed exomoon transits should ac-
tually be quite common for misaligned planet-moon systems, such as
the one proposed by Teachey & Kipping (2018).
Article number, page 4 of 8
planet-moon orbital configuration are compatible with the data,
though with lower likelihood.
In Fig. 2e-h, we illustrate our results for the PTMCMC fitting
of our planet-moon model to the four transits of Kepler-1625 b
including our own extraction and detrending of the Hubble tran-
sit. Again, the orbital solutions (blue lines) do not converge. A
comparison of panels d and h shows that the different extraction
and detrending methods do have a significant effect on the indi-
vidual flux measurements, in line with the findings of Rodenbeck
et al. (2018). Although the time of the proposed exomoon transit
is roughly the same in both panels, we find that the best-fit so-
lution for the data detrended with our own reduction procedure
does not contain the moon egress (panel h), whereas the best-
fit solution of the data detrended by Teachey & Kipping (2018)
does contain the moon egress (panel d). A similar fragility of
this particular moon egress has been noted by Teachey & Kip-
ping (2018) as they explored different detrending functions (see
their Fig. 3).
θ max) and the parameter sets ( #»
Our Fig. 3 illustrates the distribution of the differential likeli-
hood for the planet-moon model between the most likely model
θ (cid:48)) found after five
parameter set ( #»
θ (cid:48)F,M1) −
million steps of our PTMCMC fitting procedure, p( #»
θ maxF,M1). For the combined Kepler and Hubble data de-
p( #»
trended by Teachey & Kipping (2018) (left panel) and for our
own Hubble data extraction and detrending (right panel), we find
that most model solutions cluster around a differential likelihood
that is very different from the most likely solution, suggesting
that the most likely model is, in some sense, a statistical out-
lier. We initially detected this feature after approximately the
first one hundred thousand PTMCMC fits. Hence, we increased
the number of PTMCMC samplings to half a million and finally
to five million to make sure that we sample any potentially nar-
row peaks of the likelihood function near the best-fit model at
θ maxF,M1) = 0 with sufficient accuracy. We
p( #»
find, however, that this behavior of the differential likelihood
distribution clustering far from the best-fit solution persists, ir-
respective of the available computing power devoted to the sam-
pling.
θ (cid:48)F,M1) − p( #»
6366380.99500.99751.00001.0025relativefluxa1210.01212.5b149614981500BKJD[d]0.99500.99751.00001.0025relativefluxc32223223BKJD[d]d6366380.99500.99751.00001.0025relativefluxe1210.01212.5f149614981500BKJD[d]0.99500.99751.00001.0025relativefluxg32223223BKJD[d]hmoon ingressno moon egress René Heller et al.: Alternative explanations for the exomoon interpretation for Kepler-1625
Fig. 3. Differential likelihood distribution between the most likely planet-moon model and the other solutions using 106 steps of our PTMCMC
fitting procedure. Left: Results from fitting our planet-moon transit model to the original data from Teachey & Kipping (2018). Right: Results from
fitting our planet-moon transit model to our own detrending of the Kepler and WFC3 data. In both panels the most likely model is located at 0
along the abscissa by definition. In both cases the models do not converge to the best-fit solution, suggesting that the best-fit solution could in fact
be an outlier.
Table 1. Results of our PTMCMC fitting procedure to the combined Ke-
pler and Hubble data. The Hubble data was either based on the photom-
etry extracted by Teachey & Kipping (2018, TK18b, central column) or
based on our own extraction (right column).
TK18b HST photometry Our HST photometry
rs [%]
aps [R(cid:63)]
Ps [d]
ϕ [rad]
fM [%]
is [rad]
Ωs [rad]
1.9+0.5−0.5
2.9+1.3−0.6
27+15−13
3.3+2.0−2.3
1.9+1.6−0.8
−0.2+2.4−2.3
−0.1+2.1−2.1
1.6+0.5−0.5
2.9+1.5−1.0
29+17−15
3.2+2.2−2.2
2.0+1.7−1.0
−0.1+2.3−2.2
−0.2+2.0−1.8
Notes. Figure 4 illustrates quite clearly that the posterior distributions
are not normally distributed and often not even representative of skewed
normal distributions. The confidence intervals stated in this table have
thus to be taken with care.
Figure 4 shows the posterior distributions of the moon pa-
rameters of our planet-moon model. The top panel refers to
our PTMCMC fitting of the combined Kepler and Hubble data
(Hubble data as detrended and published by Teachey & Kipping
2018), and the bottom panel shows our PTMCMC fitting of the
Kepler data combined with our own extraction and detrending of
the Hubble light curve. The respective median values and stan-
dard deviations are noted in the upper right corners of each sub-
panel and summarized in Table 1.
A comparison between the upper and lower corner plots in
Fig. 4 reveals that the different detrending and fitting techniques
have a significant effect on the resulting posterior distributions,
in particular for is and Ωs, the two angles that parameterize the
orientation of the moon orbit. At the same time, however, the
most likely values (red dots above the plot diagonal) and me-
dian values (blue crosses below the plot diagonal) of the seven
parameters shown are well within the 1 σ tolerance.
The following features can be observed in both panels of
Fig. 4. The moon-to-star radius ratio (Col. 1, leftmost) shows
an approximately normal distribution, whereas the scaled planet-
moon orbital semimajor axis (Col. 2) shows a more complicated,
skewed distribution. The solutions for the orbital period of the
exomoon candidate (Col. 3) show a comb-like structure owing
to the discrete number of completed moon orbits that would fit a
given value of the moon's initial orbital phase (Col. 4), which is
essentially unconstrained. The moon-to-planet mass ratio (Col.
5) then shows a skewed normal distribution with a tail of large
moon masses. Our results for the inclination is between the satel-
lite orbit (around the planet) and the line of sight, and for the
longitude of the ascending node of the moon orbit are shown
in Cols. 6 and 7. The preference of is being either near 0 or
near ±π (the latter is equivalent to a near-coplanar retrograde
moon orbit) illustrates the well-known degeneracy of the pro-
grade/retrograde solutions available from light curve analyses
(Lewis & Fujii 2014; Heller & Albrecht 2014).
3.2. Transit timing variations
for
Our planet-only model
Next we consider the possibility of the transits being caused by a
planet only. Neglecting the Hubble transit, our PTMCMC sam-
pling of the three Kepler transits with our planet-only transit
model gives an orbital period of P = 287.3776 ± 0.0024 d and
an initial transit midpoint at t0 = 61.4528 ± 0.0092 d in units
of the Barycentric Kepler Julian Day (BKJD), which is equal
to BJD − 2, 454, 833.0 d. The resulting transit time of the 2017
Hubble transit is 3222.6059 ± 0.0182 d.
the 2017 Hubble transit
gives a transit midpoint at 3222.5547 ± 0.0014 d, which is
73.728(±2.016) min earlier than the predicted transit midpoint.
This is in agreement with the measurements of Teachey & Kip-
ping (2018), who found that the Hubble transit occurred 77.8 min
earlier than predicted. This observed early transit of Kepler-
1625 b has a formal ∼ 3 σ significance. We note, however, that
this 3 σ deviation is mostly dictated by the first transit observed
with Kepler (see Fig. S12 in Teachey et al. 2018). We also note
that this transit was preceded by a ∼ 1 d observational gap in
the light curve, about 0.5 d prior to the transit, which might af-
fect the local detrending of the data and the determination of the
transit mid-point of a planet-only model. Moreover, with most
Article number, page 5 of 8
40 35 30 25 20 15 10 50lnp(~✓F,M1) lnp(~✓maxF,M1)0.000.020.040.060.080.10probabilitydensity 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 50lnp(~✓F,M1) lnp(~✓maxF,M1)0.000.020.040.060.080.100.12probabilitydensity A&A submitted
Fig. 4. Posterior distributions of a parallel tempering ensemble MCMC sampling of the combined Kepler and WFC3 data with our planet-moon
model. Top: Results for the original data from Teachey & Kipping (2018). Bottom: Results for our own detrending of the Kepler and WFC3 data. In
both figures, scatter plots are shown with black dots above the diagonal, and projected histograms are shown as colored pixels below the diagonal.
The most likely parameters are denoted with an orange point in the scatter plots. Histograms of the moon-to-star radius ratio rs, scaled semimajor
axis of the planet-moon system (aps/R(cid:63)), satellite orbital period (Ps), satellite orbital phase (ϕ), moon-to-planet mass ratio ( fM), orbital inclination
of the satellite with respect to our line of sight (is), and the orientation of the ascending node of the satellite orbit (Ωs) are shown on the diagonal.
Median values and standard deviations are indicated with error bars in the histograms.
Article number, page 6 of 8
rs=1.9+0.5 0.5%02.55aps/R?apsR?=2.9+1.3 0.6153045Ps[d]Ps=27+15 13d02.55''=3.3+2.0 2.302.55fM[%]fM=1.9+1.6 0.8% 202isis= 0.2+2.4 2.30123rs[%] 202⌦s02.55aps/R?153045Ps[d]02.55'02.55fM[%] 202is 2.50.02.5⌦s⌦s= 0.1+2.1 2.1rs=1.6+0.5−0.5%02.55aps/R?apsR?=2.9+1.5−1.00153045Ps[d]Ps=29+17−15d02.55ϕϕ=3.2+2.2−2.202.55fM[%]fM=2.0+1.7−1.0%−202isis=−0.1+2.3−2.20123rs[%]−202Ωs02.55aps/R?0153045Ps[d]02.55ϕ02.55fM[%]−202is−2.50.02.5ΩsΩs=−0.2+2.0−1.8 René Heller et al.: Alternative explanations for the exomoon interpretation for Kepler-1625
which illustrates that the suspected planet could be more massive
than most of the known hot Jupiters.
4. Conclusions
With a ∆BIC of −44.5 (using published Hubble data of Teachey
& Kipping 2018) or −31.0 (using our own Hubble extraction
and detrending) between the most likely planet-only model and
the most likely planet-moon model, we find strong statistical
evidence for a roughly Neptune-sized exomoon. In both cases
of the data detrending, the most likely orbital solution of the
planet-moon system, however, is very different from most of
the other orbital realizations of our PTMCMC modeling and the
most likely solutions do not seem to converge. In other words,
the most likely solution appears to be an outlier in the distri-
bution of possible solutions and small changes to the data can
have great effects on the most likely orbital solution found for
the planet-moon system. As an example, we find that the two
different detrending methods that we explored produce different
interpretations of the transit observed with Hubble: in one case
our PTMCMC sampling finds the egress of the moon in the light
curve, in the other case it does not (Fig. 2).
Moreover, the likelihood of this best-fit orbital solution is
very different from the likelihoods of most other solutions from
our PTMCMC modeling. We tested both a standard MCMC
sampling and a parallel-tempering MCMC (Foreman-Mackey
et al. 2013); the latter is supposed to explore both the parame-
ter space at large and the tight peaks of the likelihood function in
detail. Our finding of the nonconvergence could imply that the
likelihood function that best describes the data is non-Gaussian.
Alternatively, with the BIC being an asymptotic criterion that re-
quires a large sample size by definition (Stevenson et al. 2012),
our findings suggest that the available data volume is simply too
small for the BIC to be formally applicable. We conclude that
the ∆BIC is an unreliable metric for an exomoon detection for
this data set of only four transits and possibly for other data sets
of Kepler as well.
One solution to evaluating whether the BIC or an alternative
information criterion such as the Akaike information criterion
(AIC; Akaike 1974) or the deviance information criterion (DIC;
Spiegelhalter et al. 2002) is more suitable for assessing the likeli-
hoods of a planet-only model and of a planet-moon model could
be injection-retrieval experiments of synthetic transits (Heller
et al. 2016b; Rodenbeck et al. 2018). Such an analysis, however,
goes beyond the scope of this paper.
We also observe the TTV effect discovered by Teachey &
Kipping (2018). If the early arrival of Kepler-1625 b for its late-
2017 transit was caused by an inner planet rather than by an exo-
moon, then the planet would be a super-Jovian mass hot Jupiter,
the exact mass limit depending on the assumed orbital semimajor
axis. For example, the resulting stellar radial velocity amplitude
would be about 900 m s−1 for a 5.8 MJup planet at 0.03 AU and
about 150 m s−1 for a 1.8 MJup planet at 0.1 AU. From the ab-
sence of a transit signature of this hypothetical planet in the four
years of Kepler data, we conclude that it would need to have an
orbital inclination of at least i = 7.8+1.1−2.0 (if it were at 0.03 AU)
or i = 2.4+0.3−0.6 degrees (if it were at 0.1 AU). If its inclination is
not close to 90◦, at which point its effect on the stellar RV ampli-
tude would vanish, then the hypothesis of an unseen inner planet
causing the Kepler-1625 TTV could be observationally testable.
Ground-based photometric observations are hardly practica-
ble to answer the question of this exomoon candidate because
continuous in- and near-transit monitoring of the target is re-
Article number, page 7 of 8
Fig. 5. Mass estimate for the potential inner planet around Kepler-1625
based on the observed TTV of 73.728 min. The thin pale blue fan around
the solid curve shows the 1 σ tolerance fan of ±2.016 min. Values for
semimajor axes > 0.1 AU are poor approximations and thus shown with
a dashed line. Black points show masses and semimajor axes of all
planets from exoplanet.eu (as of 26 October 2018) around stars with
masses between 0.75 M(cid:12) and 1.25 M(cid:12). A conservative estimate of a dy-
namically unstable region for the suspected inner planet, where its Hill
sphere would touch the Hill sphere of Kepler-1625 b with an assumed
mass of 1 MJup, is shaded in pale red. RV amplitudes and minimum or-
bital inclination with respect to Kepler-1625 b are noted along the curve
for the planetary mass estimate.
of the TTV effect being due to the large deviation from the lin-
ear ephemeris of the first transit, stellar (or any other systematic)
variability could have a large (but unknown) effect on the error
bars that go into the calculations.
In Fig. 5 we show the mass of an unseen inner planet that
is required to cause the observed 73.7 min TTV amplitude from
our PTMCMC fit as a function of its unknown orbital semimajor
axis. The mass drops from 5.8 MJup at 0.03 AU to 1.8 MJup at
0.1 AU. Values beyond 0.1 AU cannot be assumed to fulfill the
approximations made for Eq. (3) and are therefore shown with a
dashed line. The actual TTV amplitude of Kepler-1625 b could
even be higher than the ∼ 73 min that we determined for the
Hubble transit, and thus the mass estimates shown for a possible
unknown inner planet serve as lower boundaries.
The resulting radial velocity amplitudes of the star of
923 m s−1 (at 0.03 AU) and 151 m s−1 (at 0.1 AU), respectively,
are indicated along the curve. Even if the approximations for
a coplanar, close-in planet were not entirely fulfilled, our re-
sults suggest that RV observations of Kepler-1625 with a high-
resolution spectrograph attached to a very large (8 m class)
ground-based telescope could potentially reveal an unseen planet
causing the observed TTV of Kepler-1625 b. Also shown along
the curve in Fig. 5 are the respective minimum orbital inclina-
tions (rounded mean values shown) between Kepler-1625 b and
the suspected close-in planet required to prevent Kepler-1625 b
from transiting the star. The exact values are i = 7.8+1.1−2.0 degrees
at 0.03 AU and i = 2.4+0.3−0.6 degrees at 0.1 AU.
The pale red shaded region is excluded from a dynamical
point of view since this is where the planetary Hill spheres would
overlap. The extent of this region is a conservative estimate be-
cause it assumes a mass of 1 MJup for Kepler-1625 b and neglects
any chaotic effects induced by additional planets in the system
or planet-planet cross tides etc. The true range of unstable orbits
is probably larger. The black dots show all available exoplanet
masses and semimajor axes from the Exoplanet Encyclopaedia,
0.1 1 10 0.02 0.1 1mass of suspected planet [MJup]semi-major axis [AU]exoplanet.eu 0.1 1 10 0.02 0.1 1unstable151 m/s923 m/s7.8o2.4o Mathur, S., Huber, D., Batalha, N. M., et al. 2017, ApJS, 229, 30
McCullough, P. & MacKenty, J. 2012, Considerations for using Spatial Scans
arXiv:1901.06366
with WFC3, Tech. rep.
Pirzkal, N., Ryan, R., & Brammer, G. 2016, Trace and Wavelength Calibrations
of the WFC3 G102 and G141 IR Grisms, Tech. rep.
Rodenbeck, K., Heller, R., Hippke, M., & Gizon, L. 2018, A&A, 617, A49
Schwarz, G. 1978, Annals of Statistics, 6, 461
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & Van Der Linde, A. 2002, Journal
of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 64, 583
Stevenson, K. B., Harrington, J., Fortney, J. J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 754, 136
Teachey, A. & Kipping, D. M. 2018, Science Advances, 4, eaav1784
Teachey, A., Kipping, D. M., & Schmitt, A. R. 2018, AJ, 155, 36
Wilkins, A. N., Deming, D., Madhusudhan, N., et al. 2014, ApJ, 783, 113
A&A submitted
Kipping, D. M., Bakos, G. Á., Buchhave, L., Nesvorný, D., & Schmitt, A. 2012,
ApJ, 750, 115
Lewis, K. M. & Fujii, Y. 2014, ApJ, 791, L26
Mandel, K. & Agol, E. 2002, ApJ, 580, L171
Martin, D. V., Fabrycky, D. C., & Montet, B. T. 2019, arXiv e-prints,
quired over at least two days. Current and near-future space-
based exoplanet missions, on the other hand, will likely not be
able to deliver the signal-to-noise ratios required to validate or
reject the exomoon hypothesis. With a Gaia G-band magnitude
of mG = 15.76 (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2016, 2018) the star is
rather faint in the visible regime of the electromagnetic spectrum
and the possible moon transits are therefore beyond the sensitiv-
ity limits of the TESS, CHEOPS, and PLATO missions. 2MASS
observations suggest that Kepler-1625 is somewhat brighter in
the near-infrared (Cutri et al. 2003), such that the James Webb
Space Telescope (launch currently scheduled for early 2021)
should be able to detect the transit of the proposed Neptune-
sized moon, for example via photometric time series obtained
with the NIRCam imaging instrument.
All things combined, the fragility of the proposed photomet-
ric exomoon signature with respect to the detrending methods,
the unknown systematics in both the Kepler and the Hubble data,
the absence of a proper assessment of the stellar variability of
Kepler-1625, the faintness of the star (and the resulting photo-
metric noise floor), the previously stated coincidence of the pro-
posed moon's properties with those of false positives (Roden-
beck et al. 2018), the existence of at least one plausible alterna-
tive explanation for the observed TTV effect of Kepler-1625 b,
and the serious doubts that we have about the ∆BIC as a reliable
metric at least for this particular data set lead us to conclude that
the proposed moon around Kepler-1625 b might not be real. We
find that the exomoon hypothesis heavily relies on a chain of del-
icate assumptions, all of which need to be further investigated.
A similar point was raised by Teachey & Kipping (2018),
and our analysis is an independent attempt to shed some light
on the "unknown unknowns" referred to by the authors. For the
time being, we take the position that the first exomoon has yet
to be detected as the likelihood of an exomoon around Kepler-
1625 b cannot be assessed with the methods used and data cur-
rently available.
Acknowledgements. The authors thank Kevin Stevenson, Hannah Wakeford and
Megan Sosey for their help with the data analysis, and Nikole Lewis for the
feedback on the manuscript. The authors would also like to thank the referee
for a challenging and constructive report. This work was supported in part by
the German space agency (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt) under
PLATO Data Center grant 50OO1501. This work made use of NASA's ADS
Bibliographic Services and of the Exoplanet Encyclopaedia (http://exoplanet.eu).
RH wrote the manuscript, proposed Figs. 2 - 4, generated Fig. 5, and guided the
work. KR derived the star-planet-moon orbital simulations and the respective
statistics and generated Figs. 2 - 4. GB performed the light curve extraction from
the WFC3 Hubble data and generated Fig. 1. All authors contributed equally to
the interpretation of the data.
References
Agol, E., Steffen, J., Sari, R., & Clarkson, W. 2005, MNRAS, 359, 567
Akaike, H. 1974, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716
Baker, S. & Matthews, I. 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Conference on
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Volume 1, Pages 1090 -- 1097
Berta, Z. K., Charbonneau, D., Désert, J.-M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 747, 35
Cutri, R. M., Skrutskie, M. F., van Dyk, S., et al. 2003, VizieR Online Data
Catalog, 2246
Deming, D., Wilkins, A., McCullough, P., et al. 2013, ApJ, 774, 95
Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306
Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A1
Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A1
Heller, R. 2014, ApJ, 787, 14
Heller, R. 2018, A&A, 610, A39
Heller, R. & Albrecht, S. 2014, ApJ, 796, L1
Heller, R., Hippke, M., & Jackson, B. 2016a, ApJ, 820, 88
Heller, R., Hippke, M., Placek, B., Angerhausen, D., & Agol, E. 2016b, A&A,
591, A67
Horne, K. 1986, PASP, 98, 609
Article number, page 8 of 8
|
1903.05468 | 1 | 1903 | 2019-03-11T18:00:00 | The Critical, Strategic Importance of Adaptive Optics-Assisted Ground-Based Telescopes for the Success of Future NASA Exoplanet Direct Imaging Missions | [
"astro-ph.EP",
"astro-ph.IM",
"astro-ph.SR"
] | Ground-based telescopes coupled with adaptive optics (AO) have been playing a leading role in exoplanet direct imaging science and technological development for the past two decades and will continue to have an indispensable role for the next decade and beyond. Over the next decade, extreme AO systems on 8-10m telescopes will 1) mitigate risk for WFIRST-CGI by identifying numerous planets the mission can spectrally characterize, 2) validate performance requirements and motivate improvements to atmosphere models needed to unambiguously characterize solar system-analogues from space, and 3) mature novel technological innovations useful for space. Extremely Large Telescopes can deliver the first thermal infrared (10 $\mu m$) images of rocky planets around Sun-like stars and identify biomarkers. These data provide a future NASA direct imaging flagship mission (i.e. HabEx, LUVOIR) with numerous exo-Earth candidates and critical ancillary information to help clarify whether these planets are habitable. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph |
Astro2020 Science White Paper
The Critical, Strategic Importance of Adaptive
Optics-Assisted Ground-Based Telescopes for
the Success of Future NASA Exoplanet Direct
Imaging Missions
Thematic Areas:
(cid:3) Formation and Evolution of Compact Objects
(cid:3) Stars and Stellar Evolution (cid:3) Resolved Stellar Populations and their Environments
(cid:3) Galaxy Evolution
(cid:2) Planetary Systems (cid:3) Star and Planet Formation
(cid:3) Cosmology and Fundamental Physics
(cid:3) Multi-Messenger Astronomy and Astrophysics
Principal Author:
Name: Thayne M. Currie
Institution: NASA-Ames Research Center
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (857) 998-9771
Co-Authors: Ruslan Belikov (NASA-Ames Research Center), Olivier Guyon (Subaru
Telescope), N. Jeremy Kasdin (Princeton University), Christian Marois (NRC-Herzberg), Mark S.
Marley (NASA-Ames Research Center), Kerri Cahoy (Massachusetts Institute of Technology),
Dimitri Mawet (California Institute of Technology), Michael McElwain (NASA-Goddard
Spaceflight Center), Eduardo Bendek (NASA-Ames Research Center), Marc J. Kuchner
(NASA-Goddard Spaceflight Center), Michael R. Meyer (University of Michigan)
Co-Signers: S. Mark Ammons (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory), Julien Girard (Space
Telescope Science Institute), Yasuhiro Hasegawa (Jet Propulsion Laboratory), Mercedes
Lopez-Morales (Center for Astrophysics -- Harvard & Smithsonian), Wladimir Lyra (California
State University-Northridge/Jet Propulsion Laboratory), Ben Mazin (University of
California-Santa Barbara), Bertrand Mennesson (Jet Propulsion Laboratory), Chris Packham
(University of Texas-San Antonio), Tyler Robinson (Northern Arizona University)
Abstract: Ground-based telescopes coupled with adaptive optics (AO) have been playing a
leading role in exoplanet direct imaging science and technological development for the past two
decades and will continue to have an indispensable role for the next decade and beyond. Over the
next decade, extreme AO systems on 8-10m telescopes will 1) mitigate risk for WFIRST-CGI by
identifying numerous planets the mission can spectrally characterize, 2) validate performance
requirements and motivate improvements to atmosphere models needed to unambiguously
characterize solar system-analogues from space, and 3) mature novel technological innovations
useful for space. Extremely Large Telescopes can deliver the first thermal infrared (10 µm)
images of rocky planets around Sun-like stars and identify biomarkers. These data provide a
future NASA direct imaging flagship mission (i.e. HabEx, LUVOIR) with numerous exo-Earth
candidates and critical ancillary information to help clarify whether these planets are habitable.
Figure 1: The first directly-imaged planetary system, HR 8799: discovered with Keck and Gemini
(Marois et al. 2008a, 2010).
1. The Ground's Long-Standing, Critical Role in Advancing Exoplanet Direct Imaging
Since the first nearby extrasolar planets were discovered from indirect detection methods (Mayor
and Queloz 1995), NASA has shown a strong interest in someday directly imaging and spectrally
characterizing solar system-like planets, including an Earth twin around a Sun-like star (e.g. the
Terrestrial Planet Finder mission, Beichman 1998).
Yet nearly two decades later, ground-based telescopes utilizing adaptive optics (AO) have ac-
counted for nearly all of the 15 to 20 exoplanets and candidates imaged thus far (e.g. Fig.1; Marois
et al. 2008a; Bowler 2016). Follow-up photometry and spectra of these first discoveries yielded
crucial insights into young super-Jovian planets' atmospheric properties: clouds, carbon chem-
istry, and surface gravity (e.g. Currie et al. 2011; Marley et al. 2012). Some recent exoplanet direct
imaging discoveries -- enabled by extreme AO achieving deeper contrasts than facility systems --
have revealed cooler, lower-mass planets with far different spectra (Macintosh et al. 2015).
Ground-based telescopes have also matured key technologies and methods forming the back-
bone of future NASA direct imaging missions. The integral field spectrograph, first developed/matured
on the ground and coupled to extreme AO systems (e.g. McElwain et al. 2007; Larkin et al. 2014),
is now considered to be a key component of any future exo-Earth imaging system. The ground
has demonstrated advanced coronagraph designs like the vector vortex (Mawet et al. 2010), which
is being considered for HabEx. Sophisticated post-processing and spectral extraction methods
were developed from analyzing ground-based data and demonstrated to improve planet imaging
capabilities from space (Lafreniere et al. 2007; Marois et al. 2010; Soummer et al. 2012) . Ground-
based data clarified how speckle noise statistics relate to spectrophotometric uncertainties and af-
fect planet detection limits (Marois et al. 2008b; Mawet et al. 2014; Greco and Brandt 2016).
As described below, the ground can play an indispensable role in ensuring the success of
NASA exoplanet direct imaging missions -- through both science and technological insights -- for
the next decade of extreme AO on current telescopes and with ELTs for decades to come.
2. The Next Decade of Ground-Based Extreme AO Systems: Advancing the Scientific Poten-
tial of and Mitigating Risk for WFIRST-CGI (2020-2029)
The first generation of extreme AO systems demonstrated the capability to create a sub-arcsecond
dark hole via high-order deformable mirrors (DM) driven by advanced wavefront sensors (e.g. Es-
1
Figure 2: (Left) Even if the WFIRST-CGI Technology Demonstrator does not quite reach to reach
contrasts necessary to image mature Jupiter twins in reflected light (∼ 10−9), over the next decade
ground-based extreme AO systems utilizing focal-plane wavefront control (e.g. Subaru/SCExAO)
could provide WFIRST-CGI with numerous younger, cool self-luminous jovian planets to spec-
trally characterize. Discovery space from the ground is noted by green bars; blue lines denote
the predicted and best-demonstrated (in a lab) WFIRST-CGI contrasts. (Right) Simulated 10 µm
image of the inner solar system at 1.3 pc (credit: C. Marois). At 10 µm, ELTs can image Earth-like
planets around ∼ 10 AFGK stars, which could be followed up with a NASA mission like HabEx
or LUVOIR.
posito et al. 2011; Sauvage et al. 2016). Coupled with advanced coronagraphy, they achieved
contrasts of 10−5 -- 10−6 at 0.2" -- 0.5".
Over the next decade, extreme AO systems on current ground-based class telescopes will build
upon this foundation and break new ground. Instruments such as Subaru/SCExAO, GPI-2.0, and
MagAO-X can/will utilize focal-plane wavefront control techniques first developed in the lab and
now tested on sky (e.g. Martinache et al. 2014; Bottom et al. 2016; Matthews et al. 2017). They can
be further equipped with ultra-low noise detectors (e.g. MKIDS) to drive focal-plane wavefront
control at very high speeds (e.g. Mazin et al. 2012). As a result, by the latter half of the 2020s,
at least some extreme AO systems should deliver much deeper contrasts than currently achieved,
approaching 10−7 or possibly lower at small angles in the near-infrared (near-IR).
These new extreme AO capabilities in turn open up new exoplanet discovery and characteriza-
tion space relevant for WFIRST-CGI, which should be operational within a decade. For example,
a factor of 10 improvement in contrast over GPI/SPHERE at 0.1" -- 0.5" (∼ 10−6 -- 10−7) could allow
the detection of 1 -- 3 MJ, 10-120 Myr-old planets orbiting at Jupiter-like separations for stars in the
nearest moving groups. In the red optical, these planets should have contrasts just 20 -- 30 times
fainter (10−7 -- 10−8) and thus should be easily recoverable with WFIRST-CGI (Marley et al. 2019,
in prep.; Fig. 2a). They probe a phase space poorly explored in planetary atmospheres: 375 -- 500
K objects near the T to Y dwarf transition but at much lower gravity than field brown dwarfs. Like
the first directly-imaged exoplanets, these newly-characterized exoplanets will challenge existing
models and lead to a richer understanding of key atmospheric properties like clouds and chemistry
but at temperatures and masses more characteristic of solar system planets (Marley et al. 2019).
Hosts for planets discovered with extreme AO systems over the next decade will also include
early type stars (e.g. Vega, Fomalhaut, Altair) that provide WFIRST-CGI with a much more
photon-rich environment for wavefront control and whose planets are inaccessible to precision
2
radial-velocity detection. Dedicated WFIRST-CGI precursor surveys on 8 -- 10 m class telescopes
operating with extreme AO could identify a large sample of WFIRST-accessible self-luminous
planets. If ∼ 10−8 contrast is reached from leading/upcoming extreme AO systems on current
telescopes, some mature, ∼ 1 au-separation jovian planets in reflected light are reachable1.
Thus, even if WFIRST-CGI fails to deliver the contrasts needed to image mature reflected-
light Jupiter twins (10−9), the next decade of ground-based extreme AO systems could pro-
vide the mission many younger, brighter Jupiters to demonstrate and advance precise atmo-
sphere parameter estimation.
3. Direct Imaging Observations of Exo-Earths with Extremely Large Telescopes: Crucial
Preparatory/Complementary Data for a NASA Flagship Direct Imaging Mission (2025+)
While space may be needed to directly detect an Earth twin around a Sun-like star in reflected
light, ELTs will be able to image exo-Earths in thermal emission at 10 µm (Fig 2b). Multiple
ELTs are considering first-generation instruments with these capabilities: i.e. E-ELT/METIS and
TMT/MICHI. These instruments couple low-emissivity AO delivering exceptionally high-Strehl
corrections with advanced coronagraphy to yield contrasts at r < 1" separations of ∼10−7 in several
hours of integration time. At 10 µm, the habitable zone for Sun-like stars lies beyond 2.5 -- 3 λ/D for
ELTs out to 5 -- 6 pc. Direct imaging of rocky, Earth-radius planets receiving the same insolation
as the Earth is possible for ELTs around ∼ 10 nearby AFGK stars, including Eridani, τ Ceti,
and Procyon; ozone may be detectable with focused follow-up observations (Lopez-Morales et al.
2019). The 10 µm discovery space for Super-Earths receiving Mars-like insolation (50% larger
separation) or warm, Neptune-sized planets is even larger.
Direct imaging of rocky planets with ELTs, especially in the thermal infrared, also substan-
tially increases the science gain of NASA direct imaging missions. Disentangling the effect of
a planet's radius from its albedo based on reflected-light spectra alone is extremely challenging.
However, thermal infrared data helps to constrain the equilibrium temperature of rocky planets
and in turn the planet radius. Multi-epoch 10 µm imaging data will help identify optimal times
for reflected-light space observations. For nearby low-mass stars, ground-based reflected-light
imaging (e.g. The Planetary Systems Imager on TMT; Guyon et al. 2018) can identify exo-Earth
candidates showing evidence for biomarkers in the near-IR (e.g. O2 at 1.27 µm) (Lopez-Morales et
al. 2019). Some of these could be reimaged in the optical with large-aperture NASA direct imaging
missions probing different biomarkers, yielding more robust assessments about habitability.
In summary, direct imaging programs with ELTs can identify the best exo-Earth candi-
dates for follow-up with HabEx/LUVOIR, increasing the missions' yields for and improving
their characterization of habitable zone, rocky planets. ELTs may be especially critical for mis-
sions employing a starshade for spectroscopic follow-up, which will require well-vetted targets.
3. NASA-Applicable Technical Assessments and Technology Developments from Ground-
Based Extreme AO
Future NASA direct imaging platforms from WFIRST-CGI to HabEx/LUVOIR are planned to
yield contrasts below 10−8 to nearly 10−11 at small angles, sufficient to detect and spectrally char-
acterize mature Jupiter twins to Earth-sized, habitable zone rocky planets. Laboratory investments
in wavefront control and coronagraphy and detailed simulations to optimize performance, recom-
mended by the 2010 Decadal Survey, have significantly advanced these goals (e.g., Cady et al.
1Planets suitable for WFIRST-CGI follow-up could also be imageable with first-light 3 -- 5 µm instruments on ELTs.
3
Figure 3: Novel technologies that can be matured on the ground and applicable to future NASA
missions. Simulation demonstrating Linear Dark Field Control (LDFC) (Miller et al. 2017).
(Right) SCExAO/CHARIS data using the shaped-pupil coronagraph, tests for which assessed the
design's sensitivity to low-order aberrations.
2016; Mazoyer et al. 2016; Leboulleux et al. 2017). Due to atmospheric turbulence, ground-based
extreme AO faces unique technical challenges and greater performance limitations. Reaching con-
trasts much deeper than 10−8 on ELTs on the even the most laminar sites (i.e. Maunakea) will
be exceedingly challenging (Stapelfeldt 2006), although new wavefront sensing and control ad-
vances will push limits (e.g. Males and Guyon 2018). While current and future ground-based
telescopes will operate at much brighter contrast limits than upcoming NASA direct imaging mis-
sions, the ground can provide NASA-applicable technical assessments and help mature novel
technological advances applicable to future NASA direct imaging missions.
For instance, ground-based extreme AO may provide insights about spectral retrieval in the
presence speckle noise useful for upcoming NASA missions. At contrasts achieved by current
ground-based extreme AO systems (10−4 -- 10−6) relatively achromatic phase errors dominate the
speckle noise budget. At contrasts closer to WFIRST-CGI's performance (10−7 -- 10−9) chromatic
errors should begin to dominate (e.g. Bailey et al. 2018). This change in regime affects post-
processing and the spectral covariance of integral field spectrograph data, which impacts the signal-
to-noise ratio (SNR) needed for a given atmospheric characterization goal (Greco and Brandt
2016). Future ground-based extreme AO systems, especially those on ELTs, approaching 10−7 --
10−8 contrast at several λ/D will begin to sample the regime over which this transition occurs.
Analysis of extreme AO data over the next decade and with ELTs can help establish "best
practices" for spectral retrieval, guiding estimates for the required SNR for atmosphere character-
ization goals in the extremely faint speckle regime in which future NASA missions will operate.
The ground also provides a nimble path to mature novel technological innovations in
wavefront control methods potentially applicable to a future NASA mission. For example,
Subaru/SCExAO and MagAO-X will help mature Linear Dark Field Control (LDFC), which uti-
lizes the linear response of the region outside a dark hole (i.e. the "bright field") dug by focal-plane
wavefront control methods like electric field conjugation (EFC) to correct wavefront perturbations
that affect both the bright field and dark field (Fig 3a Miller et al. 2017). While EFC uses DM
probes to update the estimate of the electric field which perturb the science exposure, LDFC freezes
the DH state initially achieved with EFC, potentially allowing far greater observing efficiency, a
more static dark hole speckle halo, and thus deeper contrasts. Ground-based tests will provide a
first assessment of the dark hole stability with LDFC vs. current leading methods and its practical
performance advantage when incorporated within the context of a high-contrast imaging system.
Multi-star wavefront control is likewise being matured on ground-based extreme AO systems (i.e.
SCExAO) and may be important for upcoming NASA missions (Sirbu et al. 2017), since multiple
4
key direct imaging targets are binary systems (e.g α Cen).
New wavefront control and coronagraphy tested within the context of a complete extreme AO
system may reveal information hidden from targeted laboratory experiments. For example, tests of
the shaped-pupil coronagraph (SPC) with extreme AO assessed its sensitivity to low-order aberra-
tions for Strehl ratios relevant for both extreme AO and future NASA missions (Fig. 3b; Currie et
al. 2018). While qualitatively the SPC performed as expected (low sensitivity to low-order modes),
the on-sky data revealed that the relative advantage of the SPC over other designs may be larger
than expected from laboratory tests alone, as assessed by changes in the intensity profile of the
dark hole as the fidelity of the AO system correction for low-order modes was varied.
4. Recommendations
The 2010 Decadal survey noted the importance of strategic ground-based efforts to constrain
exoplanet demographics (i.e. with indirect methods) and typical levels of exozodiacal light (e.g.
with the LBTI/HOSTS program). It also included technology development for future direct imag-
ing missions in its top-ranked medium scale priority. Last year, the National Academy of Sciences
Exoplanet Science Strategy Consensus Study Report (NAS-ESS) recommended both an investment
in ELTs and a future NASA flagship mission to image exo-Earths.
As argued here, these two NAS-ESS recommendations are symbiotic: ground-based direct
imaging, both now and later with ELTs, through both science and technology development, is a
key, strategic investment to help ensure the success of future NASA direct imaging missions
from WFIRST-CGI to HabEx or LUVOIR. To maximize the return that the ground can give for
NASA direct imaging missions we make the following recommendations:
1- Ground-based direct imaging science programs with extreme AO on 8-10m class tele-
scopes and later on ELTs should be explicitly considered as critical, necessary support
for NASA's direct imaging-focused missions. Precision radial-velocity surveys have been
emphasized as key ground support for future NASA-missions like WFIRST-CGI (Dressing
et al. 2019) as they yield mature jovian planets the mission can detect and characterize and
can constrain masses. Similarly, extreme AO on ground-based telescopes over the next
decade can provide key WFIRST-CGI support. Critically, extreme AO programs can iden-
tify key targets that do not require 10−9 contrast for detection and yield supporting measure-
ments crucial for atmospheric characterization with WFIRST-CGI. Furthermore, 10 µm (and
possibly reflected-light) direct imaging with ELTs likewise precedes and can provide crit-
ical information needed to identify habitable, Earth-like planets with HabEx/LUVOIR.
2- NASA should take an explicit interest in and collaborate on ground-based technology
developments -- focal-plane wavefront control, coronagraphy, advanced post-processing/spectral
retrieval methods, and the practical gains achieved by integrating these components, etc. If
the past is any guide, these efforts over the next decade can generate key, novel advances
applicable to NASA direct imaging missions.
To optimize the ground's utility for NASA missions, one option is to support more formal,
direct partnering between NASA laboratories and observatories, an extension of the NAS-ESS's
recommendation of individual investigator programs. Doing so allows for a cross-pollination of
ideas benefiting both NASA and ground-based observatories in the near term and helps the next
generation of instrument scientists hone their skills so that they can advance NASA direct imaging
missions in the long term.
5
References
Bailey, V., Bottom, M., Cady, E., et al., 2018, Proc. SPIE, 10698, 106986P
Beichman, C. A., 1998, Proc. SPIE, 3350, 719
Bottom, M., Femenia, B., Huby, E., et al., 2016, Proc. SPIE, 9909, 990955
Bowler, B. P., 2016, PASP, 128, 2001
Esposito, S., Riccardi, A., Pinna, E., et al., 2011, Proc. SPIE 8149, 814902
Cady, E., Prada, C., An, X., et al., 2016, JATIS, 2, 1004
Crill, B., Siegler, N., 2017, Proc. SPIE, 10398, 0
Currie, T., Burrows, A., Itoh, Y., et al., 2011, ApJ, 729, 128
Currie, T., Kasdin, N. J., Groff, T., et al., 2018, PASP, 130, 044505
Dressing, C., et al., 2019, Astro2020 White Paper Ground-Based Radial Velocity as Critical Sup-
port for Future NASA Earth-Finding Missions
Greco, J., Brandt, T., 2016, ApJ, 833, 134
Guyon, O., Martinache, F., Belikov, R., Soummer, R., 2010, ApJS, 190, 220
Guyon, O., Mazin, B., Fitzgerald, M., et al., 2018, Proc. SPIE, 10703, 107030Z
Lafreniere, D., Marois, C., Duyon, R., et al., 2007, ApJ, 660, 770
Larkin, J., Chilcote, J., Aliado, T., et al., 2014, Proc. SPIE, 9147, 91471K
Leboulleux, L., Sauvage, J.-F., Pueyo, L., et al., 2017, Proc. SPIE, 10400, 0
Lopez-Morales, M., Currie, T., Teske, J., et al., 2019, Astro2020 White Paper Detecting Earth-like
Biosignatures on Rocky Exoplanets around Nearby Stars with Ground-based Extremely Large
Telescopes
Macintosh, B., Graham, J. R., Barman, T., et al., 2015, Science, 350, 64
Males, J., Guyon, O., 2017, JATIS, 4, 019001
Marley, M., Saumon, D., Cushing, M. C., et al., 2012, ApJ, 754, 135
Marley, M., Lewis, N., Batalha, N., et al., 2019, Astro2020 White Paper Scientific Investigations
for Directly Imaged Cool Giant Planets and Their Synergy With Habitable Planets
Marois, C., Macintosh, B., Barman, T. S., et al., 2008a, Science, 322, 1328
Marois, C., Lafreniere, D., Macintosh, B., et al., 2008b, ApJ, 673, 647
Marois, C., Macintosh, B., Veran, J.-P., 2010, Proc. SPIE, 7736, 77361J
Martinache, F., Guyon, O., Jovanovic, N., et al., 2014, PASP, 126, 565
Matthews, C., Crepp, J., Vasisht, G., et al., 2017, JATIS, 3, 5001
Mawet, D., Serabyn, E., Liewer, K., et al., 2010, ApJ, 709, 53
Mawet, D., Milli, J., Wahhaj, Z., et al., 2014, ApJ, 792, 97
Mayor, M., Queloz, D., 1995, Science, 378, 355
Mazin, B., Bumble, B., Meeker, S., et al., 2012, Optics Express, 20, 1530
Mazoyer, J., Pueyo, L., N'Diaye, M., et al., 2018, AJ, 155, 8
McElwain, M. W., Metchev, S., Larkin, J., et al., 2007, ApJ, 656, 505
Miller, K., Guyon, O., Males, J., 2017, JATIS, 3, 9002
Plavchan, P., et al., 2019, Astro2020 White Paper Community Endorsement of the National
Academies "Exoplanet Science Strategy" and "Astrobiology Strategy for the Search for Life
in the Universe" Reports
Sauvage, J.-F., Fusco, T., Petit, C., et al., 2016, JATIS, 2, 025003
Sirbu, D., Thomas, S., Belikov, R., Bendek, E., 2017, ApJ, 849, 142
Soummer, R., Hagan, J., Pueyo, L., et al., 2011, ApJ, 741, 58
6
Stapelfeldt, K., 2006, in The Scientific Requirements for Extremely Large Telescopes, eds. P.
Whitelock, M. Dennefeld, & B. Leibundgut, IAU Symp.,232, 149
7
|
1805.04932 | 1 | 1805 | 2018-05-13T19:20:20 | Comparison of the orbital properties of Jupiter Trojan asteroids and Trojan dust | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | In a previous paper we simulated the orbital evolution of dust particles from the Jupiter Trojan asteroids ejected by the impacts of interplanetary particles, and evaluated their overall configuration in the form of dust arcs. Here we compare the orbital properties of these Trojan dust particles and the Trojan asteroids. Both Trojan asteroids and most of the dust particles are trapped in the Jupiter 1:1 resonance. However, for dust particles, this resonance is modified because of the presence of solar radiation pressure, which reduces the peak value of the semi-major axis distribution. We find also that some particles can be trapped in the Saturn 1:1 resonance and higher order resonances with Jupiter. The distributions of the eccentricity, the longitude of pericenter, and the inclination for Trojans and the dust are compared. For the Trojan asteroids, the peak in the longitude of pericenter distribution is about 60 degrees larger than the longitude of pericenter of Jupiter; in contrast, for Trojan dust this difference is smaller than 60 degrees, and it decreases with decreasing grain size. For the Trojan asteroids and most of the Trojan dust, the Tisserand parameter is distributed in the range of two to three. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | Astronomy&Astrophysicsmanuscript no. trojan_elem_distri
October 3, 2018
c(cid:13)ESO 2018
8
1
0
2
y
a
M
3
1
.
]
P
E
h
p
-
o
r
t
s
a
[
1
v
2
3
9
4
0
.
5
0
8
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
Comparison of the orbital properties of Jupiter Trojan asteroids
and Trojan dust
Xiaodong Liu and Jürgen Schmidt
Astronomy Research Unit, University of Oulu, Finland
e-mail: [email protected]
ABSTRACT
In a previous paper we simulated the orbital evolution of dust particles from the Jupiter Trojan asteroids ejected by the impacts of
interplanetary particles, and evaluated their overall configuration in the form of dust arcs. Here we compare the orbital properties of
these Trojan dust particles and the Trojan asteroids. Both Trojan asteroids and most of the dust particles are trapped in the Jupiter 1:1
resonance. However, for dust particles, this resonance is modified because of the presence of solar radiation pressure, which reduces
the peak value of the semi-major axis distribution. We find also that some particles can be trapped in the Saturn 1:1 resonance and
higher order resonances with Jupiter. The distributions of the eccentricity, the longitude of pericenter, and the inclination for Trojans
and the dust are compared. For the Trojan asteroids, the peak in the longitude of pericenter distribution is about 60 degrees larger
than the longitude of pericenter of Jupiter; in contrast, for Trojan dust this difference is smaller than 60 degrees, and it decreases with
decreasing grain size. For the Trojan asteroids and most of the Trojan dust, the Tisserand parameter is distributed in the range of two
to three.
Key words. Meteorites, meteors, meteoroids -- Minor planets, asteroids: general -- Zodiacal dust -- Celestial mechanics
1. Introduction
2. Brief description of the dynamical model
Dust ejecta are generated when hypervelocity interplanetary
micrometeoroids impact the surfaces of atmosphereless bod-
ies (Krüger et al. 1999; Horányi et al. 2015; Szalay & Horányi
2016). As of July 2016, there are about 4266 known Jupiter Tro-
jan asteroids in the L4 swarm and 2341 in the L5 swarm (JPL
(Jet Propulsion Laboratory) Small-Body Database Search En-
gine). In previous work, we estimated the total cross section of
the Trojan asteroids that is exposed to the interplanetary flux,
and evaluated the production rate of ejecta particles from the
Trojan asteroids (Liu & Schmidt 2018). We also simulated the
subsequent evolution of these ejecta particles after ejection, and
derived their steady-state spatial configuration.
The orbital parameter distribution of the Trojan aster-
oids has received considerable interest
(Jewitt et al. 2000;
Yoshida & Nakamura 2005). The motion of the Trojan dust par-
ticles is influenced by non-gravitational perturbation forces (see
Section 2) so that their dynamics differs from that of the Trojan
asteroids, which is reflected in their respective orbital properties.
In this paper, we compare the orbital properties of the Jupiter
Trojan asteroids and Trojan dust, which show a similar orbital
behavior, but are also different in many aspects.
Because of their low number density, there is no detection yet
of Trojan dust particles although upper limits on their cross sec-
tion were inferred (Kuchner et al. 2000), and our work is based
on numerical and analytical investigations. The Lucy spacecraft
developed by NASA will be the first mission to conduct recon-
naissance of Jupiter's L4 and L5 Trojan asteroids (Levison et al.
2017). Because the dust particles are samples from the as-
teroid surfaces their in-situ compositional analysis by future
space missions will allow researchers to directly determine the
chemical composition of the asteroids (Sternovsky et al. 2017;
Toyota et al. 2017).
In this paper, the orbital parameters are defined with respect to
the Jupiter orbital inertial frame Oxoiyoizoi. The zoi axis points
to the normal of Jupiter's orbital plane at J2000 epoch, the xoi
axis is taken to be the intersection of Jupiter's orbital plane with
Jupiter's equator plane at J2000 epoch, and the yoi axis follows
the right-hand rule. The Trojans' orbital elements in the J2000
ecliptic reference frame are obtained from the JPL Small-Body
Database Search Engine, and then are transformed to the frame
Oxoiyoizoi.
For the dust particles we analyze simulation results from a
previous study (Liu & Schmidt 2018). Here we briefly describe
our model. Compared with asteroids, dust particles are subject
to non-gravitational forces including solar radiation pressure,
Poynting-Robertson (P-R) drag, solar wind drag, and the Lorentz
force due to the interplanetary magnetic field. We adopt silicate
as the material for Trojan dust. In our simulations, particles in
the size range [0.5, 32] µm are included. For each size, 100 par-
ticles from L4 Trojans are simulated until they hit Jupiter or their
Jovicentric distances lie outside the region of interest, [0.5, 15]
AU. For the details of the dynamical model and numerical sim-
ulations, the readers are referred to Liu & Schmidt (2018) and
Liu et al. (2016).
3. Distribution of semi-major axis a and orbital
resonances
We start our analysis from the distribution of the semi-major axis
for L4 Trojans and Trojan dust (Fig. 1). As expected, the distri-
bution of the Trojans' semi-major axes peaks around aJupiter (5.2
AU), while the peak for the dust population is smaller and much
wider. This is mainly because of the effect of solar radiation pres-
sure combined with the Jupiter 1:1 mean motion resonance.
Article number, page 1 of 5
A&Aproofs:manuscript no. trojan_elem_distri
The direction of solar radiation pressure is opposite to that
of the solar gravitational force. Thus, the effect of solar radia-
tion pressure can be included in terms of the effective solar mass
Meff = MSun(1− β) (Kresák 1976), where MSun is the mass of the
Sun. Other symbols with subscript "eff" in the text are defined
when the effective solar mass Meff is considered. For grain sizes
6 2 µm, the Trojan particles have short lifetimes (Liu & Schmidt
2018) because the strong solar radiation pressure rapidly expels
them away from the L4 region. Larger grains > 4 µm can be
trapped in the 1:1 resonance with Jupiter for a long time. The
effective resonant argument Ψ1:1 of the particle's 1:1 resonance
with Jupiter is expressed as
(1)
Ψ1:1 = λeff − λJupiter ,
Ψ1:1 = 0
where λ is the mean longitude. At resonance,
(Murray & Dermott 1999), and the effective semi-major axis at
the Jupiter 1:1 resonance is obtained as (Liou & Zook 1995;
Liou et al. 1995)
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
4.8
5
5.2
5.4
5.6
Fig. 1. Semi-major axis distribution for the L4 asteroids (red) and Tro-
jan dust of all sizes (blue). The black line denotes the semi-major axis
distribution for 8 µm particles. The size-dependent resonant semi-major
axis a1:1 (Eq. 4) is for 8 µm particles.
aeff, 1:1 = aJupiter" MSun(1 − β)
MSun + MJupiter#1/3
.
(2)
(a)
Here MJupiter is the mass of Jupiter, and β is the ratio of solar ra-
diation pressure relative to solar gravitational force (Burns et al.
1979). The value of β is size-dependent, the dependence of
which on grain size for silicate particles can be found in Fig. 4b
of Liu & Schmidt (2018). Kresák (1976) derived the relation be-
tween the effective and conventional semi-major axis when dust
particles are released at the perihelion and aphelion of a comet.
Because of the small eccentricity for the majority of dust par-
ticles, this relation can be simplified by neglecting the effect of
eccentricity as
1 − β
1 − 2β
Combining Eqs. 2 and 3, the conventional semi-major axis at the
Jupiter 1:1 resonance is calculated as
aeff = a
(3)
.
a1:1 = aJupiter
1 − β " MSun(1 − β)
1 − 2β
MSun + MJupiter#1/3
.
(4)
It is apparent that a1:1 < aJupiter, and a1:1 becomes smaller with
decreasing grain size because their β becomes larger. It follows
that solar radiation pressure can efficiently decrease the values
of semi-major axes. This explains why the peak in dust density
is shifted radially inward from Jupiter (Fig. 7a of Liu & Schmidt
(2018)). As an example, Fig. 2 shows the evolution of the semi-
major axis and resonant argument for an 8 µm particle for 1000
years. The dust semi-major axis librates around a1:1 with nearly
constant amplitude. The resonant argument Ψ1:1 = λeff − λJupiter
librates around a fixed angle larger than 60◦ (Figs. 2a,b). The
small wiggles in Figs. 2a,c are also induced by solar radiation
pressure.
The distribution of the semi-major axis for 8 µm particles
is bimodal (Fig. 1). This is because the rate of change for the
semi-major axis is slowest near the turning points of the libra-
tion (Fig. 2a). As a result, these semi-major axis values con-
tribute more to the distribution. The precise libration amplitudes
are different for different particles of the same size, which is the
reason why the peaks for 8 µm particles in Fig. 1 are wide. Par-
ticles of different grain size (> 4 µm) also possess this bimodal
property. However, the bimodality is buried for the whole Trojan
dust population because different peaks of various grain sizes are
superimposed onto each other.
Article number, page 2 of 5
5.3
5.2
5.1
5
0
(b)
80
60
40
0
(c)
5.25
5.2
5.15
5.1
500
1000
500
1000
5.05
40
60
80
Fig. 2. Evolution of semi-major axis (a) and resonant argument Ψ1:1 =
λeff − λJupiter (b) for an 8 µm particle. (c), Semi-major axis versus λeff −
λJupiter for an 8 µm particle for 1000 years of its evolution. Here the
resonant semi-major axis a1:1 is also for 8 µm particles.
There exist particles that are not trapped in the Jupiter 1:1
resonance, or which can escape from this resonance. Due to vari-
ous perturbation forces, these particles are transported either out-
wards or inwards, which does not occur for the Trojan asteroids
themselves. Some grains can be trapped in the Saturn 1:1 res-
onance. Following the same procedure as for Eqs. 1-4, we can
calculate the conventional semi-major axis at the Saturn 1:1 res-
onance. A 2 µm particle trapped in the Saturn 1:1 resonance is
taken as an example (Fig. 3), for which the resonant semi-major
axis is aSaturn 1:1 ≈ 8.78 AU. The particle is transported outwards
and gets trapped in and escapes the Saturn 1:1 resonance several
times.
There are also particles that can be trapped in higher order
resonances with Jupiter. As an example we show the trapping
in the Jupiter (interior) 3:4 resonance (Fig. 4) and (exterior) 4:3
resonance (Fig. 5) for 2 µm particles. The resonant arguments are
Ψ3:4 = 3λeff−4λJupiter +eff and Ψ4:3 = 4λeff−3λJupiter−eff. The
resonant semi-major axes are calculated as a3:4 ≈ 3.94 AU and
a4:3 ≈ 5.78 AU. In both cases, particles are trapped for more than
5000 years. However, the trapping probabilities in the Saturn 1:1
resonance and the Jupiter higher order resonances are low. Thus,
these resonances contribute little to the overall distribution of
dust semi-major axis.
Xiaodong Liu and Jürgen Schmidt: Comparison of the orbital properties of Jupiter Trojan asteroids and Trojan dust
12
9
6
3
0
360
240
120
0
0
5000
10000
15000
5000
10000
15000
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Fig. 3. Evolution of semi-major axis and resonant argument ΨSaturn 1:1 =
λeff − λSaturn for a 2 µm particle. Here aSaturn 1:1 is for 2 µm particles.
Fig. 6. Eccentricity distribution of L4 asteroids (red) and Trojan dust of
all sizes (blue). The black line denotes the eccentricity distribution of
2 µm particles.
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
* de
dt+drag
nearly Keplerian. Using the orbital average method, the effects
of P-R drag and solar wind drag on eccentricity can be expressed
as (Burns et al. 1979)
= −(1 + sw)
3QSQprAU2
4ρgrgc2
5e
2a2 √1 − e2! ,
(5)
where sw is the ratio of solar wind drag to P-R drag, QS is the
radiation energy flux at one AU, Qpr is the solar radiation pres-
sure efficiency, ρg is the grain density, rg is the grain radius, and
c is the light speed. On average these two drag forces reduce
the value of eccentricity for larger particles. Large eccentricities
are induced for particles with grain sizes 6 2 µm (Fig. 6). These
small particles are affected by the strong solar radiation pressure
and Lorentz force, which increase the probability of encounters
with Jupiter, Saturn, or other planets. All these effects can excite
large eccentricities.
We do not see obvious patterns in the distributions of ω (ar-
gument of pericenter) and Ω (longitude of ascending node). In-
stead, we take a look at the distribution of = ω + Ω. For the
L4 asteroids and their dust, the distributions of are shown in
Fig. 7. The peak of the Trojans' distribution is about 60◦ larger
than Jupiter. This is because = Jupiter + 60◦ is the stable
equilateral solution in the elliptic restricted three-body problem
(e.g., Sándor & Érdi 2003; Robutel & Souchay 2010), as men-
tioned above. To the knowledge of the authors, this peak with
distribution of for the Jupiter Trojan asteroids has not been
shown in the literature to date.
Roughly, the distributions of for the L4 asteroids and dust
have the same shape. However, we note that for Trojan dust
∆ = peak − Jupiter < 60◦. The value of ∆ becomes smaller
with smaller grain size, if the grains can be trapped in the Jupiter
1:1 resonance. Seen from Fig. 7, for dust of all sizes, ∆ ≈ 45◦;
while for 4 µm particles, ∆ ≈ 37◦.
Compared to the distributions of a, e, and , the inclination
distribution of dust is closer to that of the L4 Trojans (Fig. 8). The
reason is explained as follows. The variation of the inclination
can be expressed as (Murray & Dermott 1999)
di
dt
=
r cos(ω + f )
na2 √1 − e2
N,
(6)
where r is the Jovicentric distance, f is the true anomaly, n is the
mean motion, and N is the normal component of the perturba-
tion force relative to the orbital plane. Solar radiation pressure,
P-R drag, and solar wind drag have no such normal component.
Article number, page 3 of 5
8
6
4
2
180
60
-60
-180
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
Fig. 4. Evolution of semi-major axis and resonant argument Ψ3:4 for a
2 µm particle. Here a3:4 is for 2 µm particles.
Fig. 5. Evolution of semi-major axis and resonant argument Ψ4:3 for a
2 µm particle. Here a4:3 is for 2 µm particles.
4. Distributions of eccentricity e, longitude of
pericenter , and inclination i
The eccentricity distributions for the L4 asteroids and Trojan
dust of all sizes peak close to eJupiter (≈ 0.049), as shown in
Fig. 6. This is because in the elliptic restricted three-body prob-
lem, the values a = aJupiter, e = eJupiter, and = Jupiter ± 60◦
are the stable equilateral solutions (e.g., Sándor & Érdi 2003;
Robutel & Souchay 2010).
The peak value of the dust eccentricity distribution is slightly
smaller than eJupiter. This is mainly because of the effects of P-
R drag and solar wind drag. For large particles, the orbits are
A&Aproofs:manuscript no. trojan_elem_distri
0.01
0.008
0.006
0.004
0.002
0
0
60
120
180
240
300
360
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
0
1
2
3
4
5
4
10
Fig. 7. Distribution of the longitude of pericenter for L4 asteroids (red)
and Trojan dust of all sizes (blue). The black line denotes the distribu-
tion of longitude of pericenter for 4 µm particles.
Fig. 9. Evolution of inclination starting from an initial value i0. The
parameter ∆i is the integral of the contribution to di/dt due to different
perturbation forces acting on a 1 µm particle.
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Fig. 8. Inclination distribution of the L4 asteroids (red) and Trojan dust
of all sizes (blue). The black line denotes the inclination distribution of
1 µm particles.
Thus, these forces do not change orbital inclination (Burns et al.
1979). Although the Lorentz force has a normal component with
respect to the dust orbital plane, for large particles the Lorentz
force is weak because of its dependence on the inverse square
of the grain size. Besides, the polarity of the interplanetary mag-
netic field rapidly changes with the 22 year period of the solar
cycle (Gustafson 1994; Landgraf 2000), so the average effect of
the Lorentz force on inclination is very small (Fahr et al. 1995;
Moro-Martín & Malhotra 2003). Also because larger particles
can stay in the system for a longer time, the inclination distri-
bution of the whole dust population is roughly consistent with
that of the L4 Trojans for the most part.
For small particles, the magnitude of Lorentz force is rela-
tively strong; moreover, the value of β is relatively large, which
implies that the dust orbit becomes non-Keplerian. As a result,
the effect of the Lorentz force on inclination does not aver-
age out. This explains the remaining inclination difference be-
tween L4 Trojans and Trojan dust (small wiggles in Fig. 8). Tak-
ing 1 µm particles for instance, they can attain high inclination
(black line in Fig. 8) due to the stronger Lorentz force (Fig. 9).
5. Distribution of the Tisserand parameter TP
The Tisserand parameter is a nearly conserved quantity in the
circular restricted three-body problem, derived as an approxima-
tion to the Jacobi constant (Tisserand 1886; Murray & Dermott
1999). In celestial mechanics, the Tisserand parameter is often
Article number, page 4 of 5
used for orbit classification (Levison 1996; Levison & Duncan
1997). The Tisserand parameter with respect to Jupiter is defined
as
TP =
aJupiter
a
+ 2 cos ir a
aJupiter
(1 − e2) .
(7)
Similar to the dynamical behavior of comets (Levison 1996;
Levison & Duncan 1997), typical values of the Tisserand param-
eter for Jupiter Trojan asteroids satisfy 2 < TP < 3. From our
simulations, we know that dust particles keep for most of their
dynamical evolution a value of TP that is close to TP of their
sources. As a consequence, the L4 Trojans and dust particles
ejected from them have similar distributions of TP (Fig. 10). For
the overwhelming part we have 2 < TP < 3. For dust particles
there is a very small portion with values of TP > 3. This mainly
attributes to particles in the size range [1, 2] µm. For these grain
sizes, the lifetime is long enough for strong solar radiation pres-
sure to increase the TP values. As an example the TP distribution
for 2 µm particles is also shown in Fig. 10.
For dust released from the main belt asteroids (Dermott et al.
2002), we expect TP > 3 as their sources. Thus, determination
of the orbital elements from the measured dust velocity should
allow us to distinguish particles that were released from Tro-
jan asteroids and from main belt asteroids. We note that Jupiter-
family comets also have typical values of Tisserand parameters
in the range 2 < TP < 3 (Levison 1996; Levison & Duncan
1997). However, for most of these comets the semi-major axes
are much larger, or smaller, than those of Jupiter Trojans (5.2
AU). Besides, eccentricities of Jupiter-family comets (> 0.2) are
larger than the typical eccentricities of Jupiter Trojans. Thus, it
will be possible as well to distinguish dust released from Trojan
asteroids and dust from Jupiter-family comets in terms of their
semi-major axes and eccentricities.
6. Conclusions
In previous work, we developed a numerical model for dust par-
ticles ejected from the Jupiter Trojans, and derived their config-
uration in space (Liu & Schmidt 2018). In this work, we com-
pare the orbital properties of these Trojan dust particles and the
Jupiter L4 asteroids. We find that the peak of semi-major axis dis-
tribution for Trojan dust is smaller than that for Trojans, which
is mainly due to solar radiation pressure. The distribution of the
semi-major axis for grain sizes > 4 µm is bimodal. A fraction
of the particles can be trapped in the Saturn 1:1 resonance and
Xiaodong Liu and Jürgen Schmidt: Comparison of the orbital properties of Jupiter Trojan asteroids and Trojan dust
20
15
10
5
0
2.6
2.8
3
3.2
3.4
Fig. 10. Distribution of Tisserand parameter (relative to Jupiter) for L4
asteroids (red) and Trojan dust of all sizes (blue). The black line denotes
the distribution of the Tisserand parameter for 2 µm particles.
Jupiter higher order resonances. The peak of the eccentricity dis-
tribution for Trojan dust is also smaller than that for Trojans,
which is because of the action of P-R drag. For the Trojan aster-
oids, the peak in the longitude of pericenter distribution is about
60◦ larger than Jupiter's longitude of pericenter. For Trojan dust
this difference is less than 60◦, and it decreases with decreasing
grain size. The inclination distributions of Trojans and Trojan
dust are quite similar, except that small particles can attain large
inclination due to the effect of the Lorentz force. The Trojan as-
teroids and most Trojan dust have typical values of Tisserand
parameters in the range of two to three.
Acknowledgements. This work was supported by the European Space Agency
under the project Jovian Micrometeoroid Environment Model (JMEM) (contract
number: 4000107249/12/NL/AF) at the University of Oulu and by the Academy
of Finland. We acknowledge CSC -- IT Center for Science for the allocation of
computational resources on their Taito cluster.
References
Burns, J. A., Lamy, P., & Soter, S. 1979, Icarus, 40, 1
Dermott, S. F., Durda, D. D., Grogan, K., & Kehoe, T. J. J. 2002, in Asteroids
III, ed. W. F. Bottke, A. Cellino, P. Paolicchi, & R. P. Binzel (The University
of Arizona Press), 423 -- 442
Fahr, H., Scherer, K., & Banaszkiewicz, M. 1995, Planetary and Space Science,
Gustafson, B. Å. S. 1994, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 22,
Horányi, M., Szalay, J. R., Kempf, S., et al. 2015, Nature, 522, 324
Jewitt, D. C., Trujillo, C. A., & Luu, J. X. 2000, The Astronomical Journal, 120,
Kresák, L. 1976, Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia, 27,
Krüger, H., Krivov, A. V., Hamilton, D. P., & Grün, E. 1999, Nature, 399, 558
Kuchner, M. J., Reach, W. T., & Brown, M. E. 2000, Icarus, 145, 44
Landgraf, M. 2000, Journal of Geophysical Research, 105, 10303
Levison, H., Olkin, C., Noll, K., Marchi, S., & Team, L. 2017, in 48th Lunar and
Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, Texas
Levison, H. F. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Proceed-
ings, Vol. 107, Completing the Inventory of the Solar System, ed. T. Rettig &
J. Hahn, 173 -- 191
Levison, H. F. & Duncan, M. J. 1997, Icarus, 127, 13
Liou, J.-C. & Zook, H. A. 1995, Icarus, 113, 403
Liou, J.-C., Zook, H. A., & Jackson, A. 1995, Icarus, 116, 186
Liu, X., Sachse, M., Spahn, F., & Schmidt, J. 2016, Journal of Geophysical Re-
search: Planets, 121, 1141
Liu, X. & Schmidt, J. 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 609, A57
Moro-Martín, A. & Malhotra, R. 2003, The Astronomical Journal, 125, 2255
Murray, C. D. & Dermott, S. F. 1999, Solar System Dynamics (Cambridge Uni-
versity press)
Robutel, P. & Souchay, J. 2010, in Dynamics of Small Solar System Bodies and
Exoplanets, ed. J. J. Souchay & R. Dvorak (Springer), 195 -- 227
43, 301
553
1140
35
Sándor, Z. & Érdi, B. 2003, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 86,
301
Villars)
Sternovsky, Z., Hillier, J., Postberg, F., et al. 2017, in 48th Lunar and Planetary
Science Conference, The Woodlands, Texas
Szalay, J. R. & Horányi, M. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 830, L29
Tisserand, F.-F. 1886, Traité de Mécanique Céleste. Tome IV. (Paris: Gauthier-
Toyota, H., Nishiyama, K., Kawakatsu, Y., et al. 2017, in 12th Low-Cost Plane-
tary Missions Conference, Pasadena, California
Yoshida, F. & Nakamura, T. 2005, The Astronomical Journal, 130, 2900
Article number, page 5 of 5
|
1301.3380 | 1 | 1301 | 2013-01-15T15:14:32 | The GROUSE project III: Ks-band observations of the thermal emission from WASP-33b | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | In recent years, day-side emission from about a dozen hot Jupiters has been detected through ground-based secondary eclipse observations in the near-infrared. These near-infrared observations are vital for determining the energy budgets of hot Jupiters, since they probe the planet's spectral energy distribution near its peak. The aim of this work is to measure the Ks-band secondary eclipse depth of WASP-33b, the first planet discovered to transit an A-type star. This planet receives the highest level of irradiation of all transiting planets discovered to date. Furthermore, its host-star shows pulsations and is classified as a low-amplitude delta-Scuti. As part of our GROUnd-based Secondary Eclipse (GROUSE) project we have obtained observations of two separate secondary eclipses of WASP-33b in the Ks-band using the LIRIS instrument on the William Herschel Telescope (WHT). The telescope was significantly defocused to avoid saturation of the detector for this bright star (K~7.5). To increase the stability and the cadence of the observations, they were performed in staring mode. We collected a total of 5100 and 6900 frames for the first and the second night respectively, both with an average cadence of 3.3 seconds. On the second night the eclipse is detected at the 12-sigma level, with a measured eclipse depth of 0.244+0.027-0.020 %. This eclipse depth corresponds to a brightness temperature of 3270+115-160 K. The measured brightness temperature on the second night is consistent with the expected equilibrium temperature for a planet with a very low albedo and a rapid re-radiation of the absorbed stellar light. For the other night the short out-of-eclipse baseline prevents good corrections for the stellar pulsations and systematic effects, which makes this dataset unreliable for eclipse depth measurements. This demonstrates the need of getting a sufficient out-of-eclipse baseline. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | Astronomy&Astrophysicsmanuscript no. demooijwasp33
February 3, 2018
c(cid:13) ESO 2018
The GROUSE project III: Ks-band observations of the thermal
emission from WASP-33b⋆
E.J.W. de Mooij1,2, M. Brogi1, R.J. de Kok3, I.A.G. Snellen1, M.A. Kenworthy1, and R. Karjalainen4
1 Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, Postbus 9513, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands;
2 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 50 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3H4, Canada; e-mail:
[email protected]
3 SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA Utrecht, The Netherlands;
4 Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes, Apartado de Correos 321, E-38700 Santa Cruz de la Palma, Canary Islands, Spain
Preprint online version: February 3, 2018
ABSTRACT
Context.In recent years, day-side emission from about a dozen hot Jupiters has been detected through ground-based secondary eclipse
observations in the near-infrared. These near-infrared observations are vital for determining the energy budgets of hot Jupiters, since
they probe the planet's spectral energy distribution near its peak.
Aims. The aim of this work is to measure the Ks-band secondary eclipse depth of WASP-33b, the first planet discovered to transit an
A-type star. This planet receives the highest level of irradiation of all transiting planets discovered to date. Furthermore, its host-star
shows pulsations and is classified as a low-amplitude δ Scuti.
Methods. As part of our GROUnd-based Secondary Eclipse (GROUSE) project we have obtained observations of two separate
secondary eclipses of WASP-33b in the Ks-band using the LIRIS instrument on the William Herschel Telescope (WHT). The telescope
was significantly defocused to avoid saturation of the detector for this bright star (K∼7.5). To increase the stability and the cadence
of the observations, they were performed in staring mode. We collected a total of 5100 and 6900 frames for the first and the second
night respectively, both with an average cadence of 3.3 seconds.
Results. On the second night the eclipse is detected at the 12 -σ level, with a measured eclipse depth of 0.244+0.027
−0.020 %. This eclipse
depth corresponds to a brightness temperature of 3270+115
−160 K. The measured brightness temperature on the second night is consistent
with the expected equilibrium temperature for a planet with a very low albedo and a rapid re-radiation of the absorbed stellar light. For
the other night the short out-of-eclipse baseline prevents good corrections for the stellar pulsations and systematic effects, which makes
this dataset unreliable for eclipse depth measurements. This demonstrates the need of getting a sufficient out-of-eclipse baseline.
Key words. techniques: photometric -- stars: individual: WASP-33 -- planets and satellites: atmospheres
1. Introduction
In recent years, there have been many measurements of thermal
emission from the atmospheres of hot Jupiters, especially in the
mid-infrared using the Spitzer Space Telescope (e.g. the review
by Deming 2009). These Spitzer observations probe the thermal
emission of hot Jupiters redward of the peak of their spectral
energy distribution (SED), and thus measure the planet's light in
the Rayleigh-Jeans tail of their emission spectrum.
Observations in the near-infrared, on the other hand,
typically probe the planet's emission spectrum around or
even blue-ward of its peak, and therefore provide essential
information on the planet's total energy budget. During the past
three years several measurements of planetary emission short-
ward of 2.5µm have been obtained (de Mooij & Snellen
2009;
2009;
Rogers et al. 2009; Anderson et al. 2010; Alonso et al. 2010;
Gibson et al. 2010; Croll et al. 2010a; L´opez-Morales et al.
2010; Croll et al. 2010b, 2011; de Mooij et al. 2011; Smith et al.
2011; C´aceres et al. 2011; Deming et al. 2012), most of these
are in the K-band (λ=2.15µm) where the planet-to-star con-
Sing & L´opez-Morales
2009; Gillon et al.
⋆ Photometric timeseries are only available in electronic form at the
CDS via anonymous ftp to cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr (130.79.128.5) or via
http://cdsweb.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/qcat?J/A+A/
trast is most-favourable for observations with ground-based
telescopes through the available atmospheric windows.
From the combination of the measurements at multiple
wavelengths, a picture is emerging that there are (at least) two
types of hot Jupiter atmospheres, those which show a thermal
inversion, and those which do not. It has been proposed that the
presence of the inversion layer is set by the stellar irradiation,
where at high levels of irradiation the planet's stratosphere is
hot enough to keep a strongly absorbing compound in the gas
phase, while at lower irradiation levels the compound condenses
out and disappears from the gas-phase (e.g. Burrows et al. 2007;
Fortney et al. 2008).
Knutson et al. (2010) proposed an alternative scenario for
the presence or absence of a strong absorber in the highest layers
of the planetary atmosphere. In their scenario the absorber can
be destroyed by strong UV emission from the planet's host-star,
due to stellar activity. For higher levels of stellar activity, which
result in a higher UV flux, the absorbing compound is possibly
removed, resulting in a non-inverted atmosphere. Note that the
inference of an inversion layer has recently been questioned by
Madhusudhan & Seager (2010), who point out that for several
planets there is a degeneracy between the atmospheric temper-
ature structure and the chemical composition of the planet's at-
mosphere.
1
3
1
0
2
n
a
J
5
1
.
]
P
E
h
p
-
o
r
t
s
a
[
1
v
0
8
3
3
.
1
0
3
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
De Mooij et al.: The GROUSE project III: The secondary eclipse of WASP-33b
In this paper we present observations of two secondary
eclipses of the very hot Jupiter WASP-33b in Ks-band. These
are part of the GROUnd-based Secondary Eclipse project
(GROUSE), which aims to use ground-based telescopes for
exoplanet secondary eclipse observations in the optical and
near-infrared. As part of this project we have already pub-
lished Ks-band detections of the secondary eclipses of TrES-3b
(de Mooij & Snellen 2009) and HAT-P-1b (de Mooij et al. 2011)
WASP-33b (Collier Cameron et al. 2010) is currently the
only known planet to transit an A-type star (Teff =7430±100K)
which it orbits in ∼1.22 days. This makes WASP-33b the most
irradiated planet known to date, with an irradiation of 1.2·1010
erg/sec/cm2. This high level irradiation results in an expected
day-side equilibrium temperature of 3250K. Recent observa-
tions by Smith et al. (2011) indeed show a very high bright-
ness temperature at 0.9µm of 3466±140K. Additionally, since
the host-star is relatively hot, the expected UV flux it receives is
also high, making it an ideal candidate to investigate the influ-
ence of a high UV flux on the temperature structure of a planet's
atmosphere.
In addition to being the first transiting planet discovered to
orbit an A-type star, WASP-33b is also the first planet to transit
a pulsating star. In the discovery paper, Collier Cameron et al.
(2010) find evidence for non-radial pulsations in their spectral
time-series, and tentatively classified WASP-33 as a γ Doradus
pulsator, which is a class of non-radial pulsators with periods
of ∼0.3 days or longer (see e.g. Handler & Shobbrook 2002).
Recently, Herrero et al. (2011) analysed photometric time se-
ries for WASP-33 and found a pulsation period of 68.6 min-
utes, which, when converted to the pulsation parameter Q, the
product of the pulsation period and the square-root of the mean
stellar density (e.g. Breger 1990; Handler & Shobbrook 2002),
is comparable to that of δ Scuti stars, and well outside the range
of γ Doradus stars. The observed stellar pulsations have a mea-
surable impact on the transit and eclipse measurements for this
planet (e.g. Herrero et al. 2011; Smith et al. 2011; Deming et al.
2012).
In Sect. 2 we present our observations and data reduction. In
Sect. 3 stellar pulsations and the light curve fitting are presented.
Subsequently we discuss the results in Sect. 4, and finally we
will give our conclusions in Sect. 5.
2. Observations and data reduction
2.1. Observations
The secondary eclipse of WASP-33b was observed on two
nights, on August 18, 2010 and September 20, 2010, in the
Ks-band with the Long-slit Intermediate Resolution Infrared
Spectrograph (LIRIS; Acosta-Pulido et al. 2002) instrument on
the William Herschel Telescope (WHT) on La Palma.
The pixel scale of LIRIS is 0.25 arcsec per pixel, yielding
a field-of-view of 4.2 by 4.2 arcminutes, large enough to ob-
serve both WASP-33 and a reference star of similar brightness
simultaneously. Since WASP-33 is very bright, exposure times
of 1.5 seconds were used in order to avoid saturation of the de-
tector. As an additional measure to prevent saturation, the tele-
scope was strongly defocused. This is a well proven strategy
also used for other GROUSE observations (de Mooij & Snellen
2009; de Mooij et al. 2011), which should also reduce the im-
pact of flat-field inaccuracies by spreading the light over many
pixels, thereby minimizing the impact from uncorrected pixel-
to-pixel sensitivity variations. To keep the observations as stable
as possible, and in order to reduce the cycle time, the observa-
2
Fig. 1. Raw lighcurves for WASP-33 and the reference star (mul-
tiplied by 2.08 for plotting purposes) for the night of August 18,
2010 (top panel) and for the night of September 20, 2010 (bot-
tom panel). The vertical dashed lines indicate the expected be-
ginning and end of the targeted eclipse. The solid, grey, lines
show the airmass during the nights, scaled to match the stellar
flux in the first hour of the observations.
tions were performed in staring mode. Since this method does
not allow for background subtraction using the science frames,
a set of sky frames were obtained after the observations on both
nights for sky-subtraction purposes.
On August 18 (Night I) the observations started at 00:45 UT
and lasted for ∼4.5 hours. The weather conditions during the
night were photometric, as can be seen from the raw light curves
shown in the top panel of Fig. 1. A total of 5100 science frames
were obtained with an average cadence of 3.3 seconds. The first
three frames of a sequence of frames1 are known to suffer from
the reset anomaly, which is seen as an anomalous structure in the
background. These frames are therefore excluded from further
analysis, which results in a total of 4994 frames.
The observations on September 20 (hereafter night II) were
taken between 22:35 UT and 05:00UT. During the first part of
the observations the conditions were photometric, however dur-
ing the last few hours occasional clouds moved across the image,
absorbing up to 65% of the light (see Fig. 1). A total of 6693 sci-
ence frames were obtained with an average cadence of 3.3 sec-
onds per frame, excluding 207 frames due to the reset-anomaly.
1 The observations consisted of multiple sequences of 100-200
frames
De Mooij et al.: The GROUSE project III: The secondary eclipse of WASP-33b
2.2. Datareduction
The data-reduction for both nights was performed in the same
way. All frames were corrected for crosstalk along rows of the
detector, which is present at a level of 10−5 of the total flux along
the rows of all four quadrants. Subsequently we performed a
non-linearity correction on all the frames using our own non-
linearity measurements which were created from a set of dome-
flats at a constant level of illumination but with varying exposure
times. After these corrections the images were flat-fielded using
a flat-field created from bright and dark twilight flats.
A background map was constructed from the set of dithered
images obtained after the eclipse observations. These images
were reduced in the same way as the science images, and, af-
ter filtering out the discrepant pixels in time to remove (faint)
stars, were subsequently combined. The resultant background
map was then scaled and subtracted from the individual science
images.
After background subtraction, aperture photometry was per-
formed on both WASP-33 and the reference star using an aper-
ture of 18 and 26 pixels for night I and night II respectively. Any
residual sky background was determined in annuli between 30
and 50 pixels for night I and between 40 and 60 pixels for night
II. The flux in the annuli was clipped at 5σ to avoid outliers in the
background (such as hot pixels) from affecting the data. Finally,
the light curve of WASP-33 was normalised with that of the ref-
erence star, and the resultant light curves for the two nights are
shown in the top panels of Figs. 3 and 4.
3. Correction for systematic effects and stellar
pulsations
3.1. Stellarpulsations
(2010) noted that
Collier Cameron et al.
the host-star of
WASP-33b is a pulsator. Observations by Herrero et al. (2011)
indicated a dominant period of 68.5 minutes. Smith et al. (2011)
observed a secondary eclipse of WASP-33b in a narrowband fil-
ter at 0.91µm, and found three pulsation periods in their data,
at 53.62, 76.52 and 41.85 minutes, all with amplitude between
0.4 mmag and 0.9 mmag. Observations by Deming et al. (2012)
showed various pulsation periods, 68 minutes for observations of
two separate events in the mid-infrared from the Spitzer Space
Telescope, 71 minutes for one ground-based event in the K-band,
146 minutes for observations in the J-band and 54 & 126 min-
utes for a second set of K-band observations. For all their periods
the amplitudes were larger than 1 mmag, with the two nights of
K-band data showing amplitudes in excess of 2 mmag.
For our data, the stellar pulsations are clearly visible in the
light curve for night I, while for night 2 the variability is less
apparent. In order to determine the period(s) of the stellar pulsa-
tions, a periodogram of the light curves was created. Since the
planetary eclipse signal and possible systematic effects can influ-
ence the periods found in the data, both a scaled eclipse model
as well as a model for the systematics based on instrumental ef-
fects (see section 3.2) were fitted to the data using a simple linear
regression algorithm and subsequently divided out before deter-
mining the periodogram. The generalised Lomb-Scargle formal-
ism from Zechmeister & Kurster (2009) was used to construct
the periodogram, and the results for both nights are shown in
Fig. 2.
For night I the strongest peak in the periodogram is found at
a period of 64.5 minutes, and there is a weaker peak at 43.2 min-
utes. For night II, there are four peaks visible, the strongest peak
Fig. 2. Normalised periodograms of the light curves for the two
separate nights. The top panel shows the periodogram for night
I and the bottom panel shows the periodogram for night II. The
dashed lines in both panels indicate the periods used in the fit-
ting.
is found at 52.1 minutes, while three weaker peaks are found
at 43.3, 65.3 and 83.9 minutes. The signals at all the periods
in both datasets have a false-alarm probability, estimated using
Monte-Carlo simulations, of below 0.1%, indicating that the pe-
riodicities are very likely real, although they might not be as-
trophysical in origin. In both datasets we find a periodic signal
at ∼65 minutes, which differs from the period of 68.5 minutes
found by Herrero et al. (2011) and the 68 minute period from
the two Spitzer datasets from Deming et al. (2012). However, the
short time span covered during each night is not sufficient to get
a very tight constraint on the period, and therefore the periods
could be consistent with 68 minutes. The ∼43 minute period is
seen in the measurements from both our nights, as well as in
the data from Smith et al. (2011). The period around ∼52 min-
utes is found in both our second night of data as well as in the
data from Smith et al. (2011) and Deming et al. (2012), although
there it is not the dominant frequency. We caution, however, that
the periodograms used for the frequency analysis were created
with data that was only partially corrected for systematic effects,
and therefore can still be influenced by residual (quasi) periodic
systematic effects.
3.2. Lightcurvefitting
Since the light curve is the result of a combination of three ef-
fects, the stellar variability, systematic effects related to both the
instrument and the Earth's atmosphere and the secondary eclipse
3
De Mooij et al.: The GROUSE project III: The secondary eclipse of WASP-33b
Table 1. Fitted parameters and uncertainties from the MCMC analysis of the lightcurves of WASP-33b.
Parameter
Night 1
Night 2
unit
(%)
Instrumental parameters
Polynomial
Instrumental parameters
Polynomial
0.140±0.007
0.092±0.017
0.245±0.009
0.246±0.018
--
--
--
0.42±0.01
-0.09±0.02
0.10±0.01
62.00±0.51
0.082±0.005
0.042±0.004
0.06±0.01
-0.76±0.03
0.27±0.03
--
--
--
63.95±0.39
43.22 (fixed)
0.095±0.004
0.041±0.004
--
--
--
--
-0.12±0.02
0.34±0.03
-0.53±0.03
--
--
--
52.65±0.39
--
--
--
0.10±0.01
-0.01±0.02
-0.13±0.01
52.28±0.51
43.34 (fixed)
65.29 (fixed)
83.90 (fixed)
0.056±0.006
0.017±0.005
0.011±0.006
0.031±0.006
0.058±0.006
0.014±0.005
0.011±0.006
0.013±0.006
(minutes)
(minutes)
(minutes)
(minutes)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
Fp/F∗
x
airmass
sky
c1
c2
c3
P1
P2
P3
P4
A1
A2
A3
A4
Notes. Baseline coefficents for the instrumental model are the x-position, airmass and sky level and for the polynomial baseline the coefficients
are c1 to c3. P1 to P4 are the periods used for the stellar pulsations, and A1 to A4 are the corresponding amplitudes.
of WASP-33b, a fit for all three effects is performed simultane-
ously.
For the stellar pulsations the period of the dominant mode
is left as a free parameter, although with a penalty for the χ2
of the form (P-P0)2/σ2
p, with P0 the period determined from the
periodogram, and σp set to 1 minute. The periods of the other
modes was kept fixed to periods found in the analysis of the pe-
riodogram as described in the previous section. For all the modes
the offset in phase and the amplitude of the pulsations were al-
lowed to vary freely.
For the fitting of systematic effects two different methods
were used. For the first method, the systematic effects are con-
sidered to be due to the change of position on the detector,
the airmass and the difference in sky background between the
two quadrants. This is similar to what was used in the previous
papers from the GROUSE project (de Mooij & Snellen 2009;
de Mooij et al. 2011). In the second method, the systematic ef-
fects are modelled using low order polynomials, as also used in
de Mooij et al. (2012) for the near-infrared transit observations
of GJ1214b.
Before fitting, outliers were removed by excluding all points
that were more than 0.9% away from a median smoothed light
curve with a box size of 51 points, as well as all points for which
the flux of the individual stars, corrected for airmass, dropped
below 90%. In this way a total 21 and 414 points were excluded
during the first and second night respectively. In addition, there
is a feature present in both light curves at the same time after
the start of the observations (after 0.1795±0.0025 days) that is
not at an identical point during the planet's orbit and therefore
most likely due to an, as yet, unidentified instrumental effect.
Excluding all the points that were obtained during this feature
removes an additional 128 frames.
The light curves were fitted with 9 free parameters (1 for the
eclipse, 3 for the systematic effects and 5 for the stellar pulsa-
tions) for night I, and 13 free parameters for night II (due to 2
additional periods found in the data). The two nights were fit-
ted separately using a Markov-Chain Monte Carlo method. Per
night, 5 sequences of 2 million steps were generated, trimming
the first 200,000 points to avoid any contamination from the ini-
tial conditions. The chains were combined after checking that
they were well mixed (Gelman & Rubin 1992).
The
secondary
using
eclipse was modelled
the
Mandel & Agol (2002) formalism. We used the parameters
from Collier Cameron et al. (2010) for the impact parameter,
semi-major axis, orbital period and planet-to-star size ratio,
while the orbit of the planet is assumed to be circular. This
assumption is reasonable since the planet orbits extremely close
to its host-star, which should result into a rapid damping of
eccentricity. In addition, on the second night an eclipse-shaped
dip in the light curve centered on φ ∼0.5 is readily visible (see
the right panel of Fig. 3).
4. Results and discussion
The best fit values of the eclipse depth and their fornal uncer-
tainties for night I are 0.140±0.007% and 0.092±0.017% for the
fit with instrumental parameters and polynomials respectively,
while for night II the best-fit eclipse depths are 0.245±0.009%
and 0.245±0.018% for the two respective anlyses. These results
are given in Table 1.
4
De Mooij et al.: The GROUSE project III: The secondary eclipse of WASP-33b
Fig. 3. Light curves for the secondary eclipse of WASP-33b for the night I (left panels) and night II (right panels). Top panels: the
light curves of WASP-33 normalised with those of the reference star, overplotted is the best fitting 'full' model with a low order
polynomial baseline correction, stellar pulsations and the eclipse. Middle panels: The light curves corrected for the trends in the
baseline and stellar pulsations, clearly showing the transit. Bottom panels: The residuals after subtracting the best-fit model. The
thick points with errorbars in these figures show the data binned by 50 points. The vertical dashed lines show the expected times for
first to fourth contact.
The differences found between methods in the first night are
significantly larger than the uncertainties in the eclipse depth as
estimated from the MCMC analysis. First of all the first night
suffers from a strong peak, possibly due to stellar pulsations,
right in the middle of the eclipse. We attribute this to a prob-
lem with the observations on night I. The relatively short out-of-
eclipse baselines available for the first eclipse observation ham-
pers the removal of the systematic effects from the stellar pulsa-
tions, as well as from the instrumental and atmospheric effects.
This is clearly illustrated when looking at the correlations be-
tween the parameters used for the removal of the systematics
and the eclipse depth, as shown in Figs. A.1 to A.4. We there-
fore conclude that the first night of data is no usable for a reliable
eclipse measurement.
To assess the impact of correlated noise, we redid the anal-
ysis for night II after binning the data by 50 points (∼3 min-
utes). Although overall the parameters are the same, we find
larger uncertainties in the eclipse depths with the best-fit values
of 0.255±0.028% and 0.242±0.035% for the fit with instrumen-
tal parameters and polynomials respectively. To assess the im-
pact of (uncorrected) red noise on the measured eclipse depths
in another way, the residual permutation method was used (e.g.
Gillon et al. 2007). The best fit model is subtracted from the light
curve, and these residuals are then shifted by n points, wrap-
ping the light curve around, so that the points that are shifted
beyond the end of the lightcurve are inserted at the beginning.
The best fit model is then added back to the data, and this new
light curve is fitted again. The interval between 16% and 84%
of the distribution of the best-fitting eclipse depths is used for
the 1-σ uncertainties on the eclipse depth. To speed up the resid-
ual permutation analysis, instead of adding back the full model,
which includes the stellar pulsation, trends in the baseline and
eclipse depth, we only used the trends in the baseline and eclipse
depth, since the correlation between the parameters for the stel-
lar pulsations and the eclipse depth is weak. From the residual
permutation analysis we also find larger uncertainties for both
5
De Mooij et al.: The GROUSE project III: The secondary eclipse of WASP-33b
Fig. 4. Same as Fig. 3 but the systematic effects are now modelled by linear relations with instrumental parameters.
decorrelation methods, with eclipse depths of 0.244+0.027
−0.020% for
a baseline fitted with instrumental parameters and 0.249+0.033
−0.052%
for a polynomial baseline fit. In all cases the uncertainties are
higher than for the MCMC analysis of the unbinned data but
comparable to the MCMC analysis of the binned data, which is
expected in the presence of red noise.
Since there is a strong correlation between the coefficients
for the polynomial baseline fit and the eclipse depth (see
Fig. A.2), we use the fit of the baseline with instrumental pa-
rameters for the remainder of the paper, since the correlation
between different parameters is much weaker. We note that the
polynomial baseline correction for this night gives the same
eclipse depth, however with a larger uncertainty.
The measured eclipse depth of 0.244+0.027
−0.020 % corresponds
to a brightness temperature in the Ks-band of 3270+115
−160 K.
This brightness temperature was calculated using the solar-
metallicity NextGen models (Hauschildt et al. 1999) interpo-
lated to the stellar parameters of WASP-33 determined by
Collier Cameron et al. (2010) (Teff=7430K, log(g)=4.294).
Currently there are several other measurments of the sec-
ondary eclipse of WASP-33b, Smith et al. (2011) obstained
data in a narrowband filter at ∼9100Å, showing a depth of
0.09±0.016%. Deming et al. (2012) observed both in the Ks-
band and in the IRAC 3.6µm and 4.5µm bands, obtaining
eclipse depths of 0.27±0.04%, 0.26±0.05% and 0.41±0.02%
respecively. These brightness measurements correspond to
a brightness temperature of 3490±140 K, 3415±130 K,
2740±225 K, 3290±100 K for the SII, Ks, IRAC 3.6µm and
4.5µm respectively. Although a planet's brightness temperature
can be a strong function of wavelenght, most of the measure-
ments are consistent at the 1σ level.
As can be seen in the middle right panel of Fig. 4, the eclipse
appears to end earlier than expected from the model. Although
systematic effects are the most likely cause of this, it is worth
noting that a narrower width of the eclipse would indicate that
the orbit of WASP-33b is eccentric. If this is the case, by com-
bining the ratio between the transit and secondary eclipse du-
rations with the time of mid-eclipse, a direct measurement of
both the eccentricity and the argument of periastron is possi-
ble (e.g. Charbonneau et al. 2005). Although a full fit is beyond
the scope of this work, we can estimate the change in duration
from the light curve. The duration of the secondary eclipse is
shorter than the transit duration by 0.01 in phase, such that the
eclipse duration corresponds to ∼90% of transit duration. From
this we estimate esin(ω)∼0.05. Since the ingress appears to be
at the expected time, the time of mid-eclipse is in this case
6
De Mooij et al.: The GROUSE project III: The secondary eclipse of WASP-33b
Fig. 5. Spectral energy distribution of WASP-33b. Top panel:
Eclipse depths in Ks-band (this work) and in the SII0.91µm-filter
from Smith et al. (2011). Bottom panel: brightness temperatures
in the two bands. Overplotted in both panels are the expected
eclipse depths/brightness temperatures for a zero-albedo homo-
geneous day-side (solid line), for an instantly re-radiating day-
side (dashed line) and for the best-fit effective temperature (dot-
ted line).
also slightly earlier than expected. From the shift we estimate
ecos(ω)∼0.008. Combining these two estimates we find an ec-
centricity of ∼0.05. We again caution that systematics can easily
give rise to an apparent non-zero determination of the eccentric-
ity, which is for instance seen for the secondary eclipse of TrES-
3b (de Mooij & Snellen 2009; Fressin et al. 2010; Croll et al.
2010b). We therefore do not advocate this non-zero eccentric-
ity scenario based on these data.
4.1. Alowalbedoandrapidre-radiationofincidentlight
With the exception of the Spitzer 3.6µm measurement from
Deming et al. (2012), all of the currently available eclipse mea-
surements for WASP-33b point towards a very hot day-side tem-
perature. If we assume that the measured brightness tempera-
tures are representative of WASP-33b's equilibrium temperature,
and are not generated deep inside the planets atmosphere, where
the temperatures are even higher, we can constrain the planet's
equilibrium temperature to Te f f,p=3298+66
−67K (see also Fig. 5).
Note that the basic assumption that the brightness temperature
equals the effective temperature does not necessarily has to be
the case, but detailed modelling of the available measurements
is beyond the scope of this paper. From this equilibrium temper-
ature we can further constrain the re-radiation factor and albedo.
For the re-radiation factor we used the f description, as used by
Fig. 6. Equilibrium temperature of WASP-33b for different
albedo (A) and re-radiation factors (f). Solid contours show
lines of constant temperatures at 150 K intervals. Overplotted
are lines of constant temperature for the measured brightness
temperatures (dashed lines), labeled with the bandpass they
were observed (D12 indicates the Ks-band measurement from
Deming et al. (2012). The line labeled "Avg." indicates the line
for constant temperature of the effective temperature determined
from the literature measurements. Vertical (dashed) lines indi-
cate the re-radiation factors for a homogeneous day-side temper-
ature (f=1/2), and for an instantly re-radiating day-side (f=2/3).
L´opez-Morales & Seager (2007):
1/2
[ f (1 − AB)]1/4
T p = T∗ (cid:18) R∗
a (cid:19)
With R∗ the stellar radius, a the semi-major axis, AB the bond
albedo and 1/4 < f < 2/3, where f=1/4 is for a homogenous tem-
perature distriubution across the planet and f=2/3 is for instant
re-radiation.
(1)
In Fig. 6 we show a simple model of the equilibrium temper-
ature as a function of albedo and re-radiation factor. In addition
we show lines of constant effective dayside temperature with the
observed brightness temperatures and derived effective tempera-
ture overplotted. As can be seen the measurements require a very
low albedo and a very short re-radiation time scale, such that all
the stellar flux is absorbed and rapidly re-radiated without hav-
ing time to advect to the night-side of the planet. This is consis-
tent with the findings of Cowan & Agol (2011), who study the
albedo and redistribution efficiencies for a large sample of hot
Jupiters, and find that the hottest planets (in their sample) have
a low albedo and a low efficiency of the advection of absorbed
stellar flux to the planet's night side.
The low redistribution efficiency suggests that
the re-
radiation timescales are short, and that the planet probably has an
inversion layer (Fortney et al. 2008). Knutson et al. (2010) hy-
pothesise that an increase in the UV-flux from an active star can
cause a shift in the photochemistry such that the efficient ab-
sorber is removed from the gas-phase. The high incident UV-flux
on WASP-33b would argue against this. It should be noted that
for active stars most of the UV flux is emitted in the Lyman α
7
De Mooij et al.: The GROUSE project III: The secondary eclipse of WASP-33b
Herrero, E., Morales, J. C., Ribas, I., & Naves, R. 2011, A&A, 526, L10+
Knutson, H. A., Howard, A. W., & Isaacson, H. 2010, ApJ, 720, 1569
L´opez-Morales, M., Coughlin, J. L., Sing, D. K., et al. 2010, ApJ, 716, L36
L´opez-Morales, M. & Seager, S. 2007, ApJ, 667, L191
Madhusudhan, N. & Seager, S. 2010, ApJ, 725, 261
Mandel, K. & Agol, E. 2002, ApJ, 580, L171
Rogers, J. C., Apai, D., L´opez-Morales, M., Sing, D. K., & Burrows, A. 2009,
ApJ, 707, 1707
Sing, D. K. & L´opez-Morales, M. 2009, A&A, 493, L31
Smith, A. M. S., Anderson, D. R., Skillen, I., Collier Cameron, A., & Smalley,
B. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 2096
Zahnle, K., Marley, M. S., Freedman, R. S., Lodders, K., & Fortney, J. J. 2009,
ApJ, 701, L20
Zechmeister, M. & Kurster, M. 2009, A&A, 496, 577
Appendix A: Correlation plots for the MCMC
analysis
line, while for WASP-33 it is likely that the UV continuum emis-
sion dominates. To investigate the influence of the UV-radiation,
photochemical modelling will be necessary (e.g. Zahnle et al.
2009).
5. Conclusion
We have presented our results of Ks-band observations of the
secondary eclipse of WASP-33b, the most irradiated planet
known to date. The measured eclipse depth for the second night
is 0.244+0.027
−0.020 %, which results in a brightness temperature of
3270+115
−160 K. This high brightness temperature, if representative
for the planet's equilibrium temperature, requires a very low
albedo and a high (f&0.5) re-radiation factor.
Combining our Ks-band measurement with the measurement
of Smith et al. (2011), we can fit a simple blackbody function
to the spectral energy distribution, and determine an effective
temperature of Teff,p=3290+66
We also find that stellar pulsations of the δ Scuti host-star,
WASP-33, appears to have switched modes between the two
nights, which are located a month apart, and also differ from
the measurements by Herrero et al. (2011). We caution, how-
ever, that this could be due to systematic effects which could
also have strong periodicities.
−67K.
The measurements on the first night suffer from strong resid-
ual systematics and stellar pulsations that cannot be fully cor-
rected due to the short out-of-eclipse baseline, and demonstrates
the need for observing a target for as long as possible.
Acknowledgements. We are grateful to the staff of the WHT telescope for their
assistance with these observations. The William Herschel Telescope is oper-
ated on the island of La Palma by the Isaac Newton Group in the Spanish
Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrof´ısica de
Canarias.
References
Acosta-Pulido, J., Ballesteros, E., Barreto, M., et al. 2002, The Newsletter of the
Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes, 6, 22
Alonso, R., Deeg, H. J., Kabath, P., & Rabus, M. 2010, AJ, 139, 1481
Anderson, D. R., Gillon, M., Maxted, P. F. L., et al. 2010, A&A, 513, L3+
Breger, M. 1990, Delta Scuti Star Newsletter, 2, 13
Burrows, A., Hubeny, I., Budaj, J., Knutson, H. A., & Charbonneau, D. 2007,
ApJ, 668, L171
C´aceres, C., Ivanov, V. D., Minniti, D., et al. 2011, A&A, 530, A5
Charbonneau, D., Allen, L. E., Megeath, S. T., et al. 2005, ApJ, 626, 523
Collier Cameron, A., Guenther, E., Smalley, B., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 507
Cowan, N. B. & Agol, E. 2011, ApJ, 729, 54
Croll, B., Albert, L., Lafreni`ere, D., Jayawardhana, R., & Fortney, J. J. 2010a,
ApJ, 717, 1084
Croll, B., Jayawardhana, R., Fortney, J. J., Lafreni`ere, D., & Albert, L. 2010b,
ApJ, 718, 920
Croll, B., Lafreni`ere, D., Albert, L., et al. 2011, AJ, 141, 30
de Mooij, E. J. W., Brogi, M., de Kok, R. J., et al. 2012, A&A, 538, A46
de Mooij, E. J. W., de Kok, R. J., Nefs, S. V., & Snellen, I. A. G. 2011, A&A,
528, A49+
de Mooij, E. J. W. & Snellen, I. A. G. 2009, A&A, 493, L35
Deming, D. 2009, in Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, Vol.
253, , 197 -- 207
Deming, D., Fraine, J. D., Sada, P. V., et al. 2012, ApJ, 754, 106
Fortney, J. J., Lodders, K., Marley, M. S., & Freedman, R. S. 2008, ApJ, 678,
1419
Fressin, F., Knutson, H. A., Charbonneau, D., et al. 2010, ApJ, 711, 374
Gelman, A. & Rubin, D. B. 1992, Statistical Science, 7, 457
Gibson, N. P., Aigrain, S., Pollacco, D. L., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 404, L114
Gillon, M., Demory, B., Barman, T., et al. 2007, A&A, 471, L51
Gillon, M., Demory, B., Triaud, A. H. M. J., et al. 2009, A&A, 506, 359
Handler, G. & Shobbrook, R. R. 2002, MNRAS, 333, 251
Hauschildt, P. H., Allard, F., Ferguson, J., Baron, E., & Alexander, D. R. 1999,
ApJ, 525, 871
8
De Mooij et al.: The GROUSE project III: The secondary eclipse of WASP-33b
Fig. A.1. Correlations between different parameters from the MCMC analysis for night I. The baseline is modelled using a polyno-
mial with coefficients c1 to c3. The correlation between the parameters and the amplitudes of the stellar pulsation at lower signifi-
cance are not shown, since their impact on any of the measured parameters will be minimal. The amplitude for stellar pulsation is
for a pulsation period of 62.00 minutes.
9
De Mooij et al.: The GROUSE project III: The secondary eclipse of WASP-33b
Fig. A.2. same as Fig. A.1 but now for night II. The amplitude for stellar pulsation is for a pulsation period of 52.28 minutes.
10
De Mooij et al.: The GROUSE project III: The secondary eclipse of WASP-33b
Fig. A.3. Correlations between different parameters from the MCMC analysis for night I. The baseline is modelled using the ob-
served instrumental parameters. The correlation between the parameters and the amplitudes of the stellar pulsation at lower signif-
icance are not shown, since their impact on any of the measured parameters will be minimal. The amplitude for stellar pulsation is
for a pulsation period of 63.95 minutes.
11
De Mooij et al.: The GROUSE project III: The secondary eclipse of WASP-33b
Fig. A.4. same as Fig. A.3 but for night II. The amplitude for stellar pulsation is for a pulsation period of 52.65 minutes.
12
|
1903.11762 | 1 | 1903 | 2019-03-28T02:27:09 | An introduction to a new space debris evolution model -- SOLEM | [
"astro-ph.EP",
"physics.space-ph"
] | SOLEM is the first space debris long-term evolution model of China. This paper describes the principles, components and workflow of the SOLEM. The effects of different mitigation measures based on SOLEM model are analyzed and presented. The limitation of the model is pointed out and its future improvement work-plan is prospected. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | Advances in Astronomy
Hindawi Template version: May18
An introduction to a new space debris evolution model - SOLEM
Xiao-wei Wang,1,2,3 and Jing Liu1,2
1 National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101.
2 Space Debris Observation and Data Application Center, CNSA, Beijing, 100101.
3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049.
Correspondence should be addressed to Jing Liu; [email protected]
Abstract
SOLEM is the first space debris long-term evolution model of China. This paper describes
the principles, components and workflow of the SOLEM. The effects of different mitigation
measures based on SOLEM model are analyzed and presented. The limitation of the model is
pointed out and its future improvement work-plan is prospected.
Introduction
During the past decades, the number of space objects has been growing rapidly. Until now,
the cataloged in-orbit space objects number has reached to about 24,000, about 19000 of
which are publicly listed at Space Track [1]. Uncataloged objects number with smaller size
has approximately reached to hundreds of millions. These space objects, mostly space debris,
pose great threats to operational safety of in-orbit spacecraft. Adopting space debris
mitigation measures is an important way to relieve the threats from space debris and prevent
the number of resident space objects from growing. However, some studies indicated that the
space debris environment would be stable for only 50 years under current mitigation
measures, even without new launches in future [2]. This statement has aroused widespread
concern over the world. In order to check and quantify the effectiveness of mitigation
measures on controlling the growth of space debris in future, many space debris evolution
models are established and compared to study the long-term stability of the future space
environment.
At present, the well-known space debris evolution models mainly include the LEGEND
model from National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) [3], DAMAGE model
from United Kingdom Space Agency (UKSA) [4], MEDEE model from Centre National
d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES) [5], DELTA model from European Space Agency (ESA) [6],
LUCA model from Technische Universität Braunschweig [7], NEODEEM model from
Kyushu University and The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA)[8], etc. Some of
these models have been used to study the stability of the future space environment in the joint
research organized by Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC) [9,10].
Besides, further work on the uncertainties affecting the long-term evolution of space debris is
encouraged in international community to better asses the uncertainty induced by the
modelling assumptions [11]. Therefore, more space debris evolution models are welcomed to
participate in such research activities, which may provide the technical supports for making
1
Hindawi Template version: May18
new space debris mitigation guidelines as well as other related policies for space traffic
management to guarantee the long-term sustainability of outer space activities.
SOLEM (Space Objects Long-term Evolution Model) is a Low Earth Orbit (LEO) space
debris long-term evolution model established by China. It has participated in the joint
researches of IADC as a representative of China National Space Administration (CNSA).
SOLEM is capable of predicting the number evolution trends of space debris, estimating the
rate of collision events of space objects during the evolution in future, and analyzing the
effects of different mitigation and remediation measures or other potential uncertainties on
the long-term evolution of space debris. The reliability of SOLEM has been validated during
the joint research of IADC.
This paper introduces the components, algorithms and workflow of SOLEM. After that, the
effects of different mitigation measures based on SOLEM model are analyzed.
The SOLEM Model
The space debris evolution model is expected to predict the evolution of space debris
population and possible collision rates for a long period in future, usually for decades even
centuries. It can be used to study the evolution processes with various assumptions. The
future evolution of space debris is affected by natural factors such as various perturbations,
atmosphere evolutions, periodic solar activities, accidental explosions, and even the surface
degradations. In fact, it could also be affected by human space activities such as launches,
collision avoidance manoeuvres, mitigation and remediation measures. In space debris
evolution model, usually the most important source and sink mechanisms are considered.
Generally, a space debris evolution model is composed of orbital propagation model,
collision probability estimation model, fragment generation model, future launch model, post
mission disposal model and active debris removal model (if the active debris removal
measures are considered). These components will significantly affect the model evolution
results if some key parameters are changed. The composition of space debris evolution model
is illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1: The general components of space debris evolution models. The left components are the main source
mechanisms, and right components are the main sink mechanisms.
Orbital propagation
Orbital propagation is to project the current orbits of space objects to the future. It is the core
component of space debris evolution model. Through orbital propagation, the space debris
evolution model is able to obtain the space objects orbital distribution at any moment in
future. There are three basic orbital prediction algorithms: numerical method, analytical
method and semi-analytical method. Numerical method has the highest precision, but takes
2
Hindawi Template version: May18
the most time in orbit propagation. Due to the long evolution time of space debris, usually
from decades to hundreds of years, moreover, the high-precision position has no practical
significance in long-term evolution, it is more appropriate to use analytical method or semi-
analytical method.
SOLEM model adopts a simplified semi-analytical orbital propagator, in which the
integration is done on the perturbation functions with the short-periodic terms removed.
Essentially, it is performed on the averaged orbital dynamic system. At present, SOLEM
covers only LEO region, including objects residing in LEO with near-circular orbits and
those crossing LEO with high eccentricity orbits. For near-circular orbits, the main
perturbations considered includes the Earth's non-spherical gravity perturbation J2, J3, J4, J2,2,
and atmospheric drag. For high eccentricity orbits, besides the Earth's non-spherical gravity
and atmospheric drag, the perturbations due to solar radiation pressure and gravity of the Sun
and Moon are also considered. The atmosphere density model used for drag calculation is the
NRLMSIS00 model. The values of solar radiation flux at 10.7 cm and the geomagnetic index
can be read from a configuration file which can be replaced according to assumptions.
). The area-to-mass ratio of these objects are calculated according to the UNW type
In order to verify this orbital propagator of SOLEM, we conducted an experiment on the
evolution of a small population. It is to compare the SOLEM propagation results with
historical data for the number evolution of a small population in a statistical view. We used
all the 1021 cataloged LEO-crossing objects on 1980.01.01 to do the experiment. It includes
38 objects with high eccentricity orbits (
(
of perturbed motion equation together with the method of least squares, using the orbital data
for months previously. For SOLEM propagation, we used historical solar activities recorded
in CelesTrak website [12] and considering no collision avoidance and station keeping
manoeuvres. The real decay information of the 1021 objects are drawn from SSR on the
space-track website [13]. The propagation result of SOLEM orbital propagator and the real
data of historical evolution of the 1021 objects are compared in Figure 2, which shows a high
consistency with a relative error of about 2%.
) and 983 objects with near circular orbits
Figure 2: The statistical results comparison of SOLEM propagation (noted as Test) and historical evolution
(noted as Real).
The semi-analytical method has a limit precision in orbit propagation. However, comparing
with the evolution of a single orbit, the space debris long-term evolution model cares more
3
0.2e0.2e
Hindawi Template version: May18
about the number evolution of the whole population in statistics. Considering the experiment
above, we think the SOLEM orbital propagator is applicable to space debris long-term
evolution model.
Fragment generation model
In-orbit breakup is one important source of space debris growth. Therefore, the accuracy of
fragment generation model simulating the breakup events has an important impact on the
simulation results of space debris evolution model. The fragment generation model is to
simulate the space debris collisions or explosions and give the instantaneous information of
generated fragments which is necessary for the subsequent evolution prediction. The
information includes the fragments number, each fragment's mass, size, velocity, etc.
In SOLEM, we adopt NASA's standard breakup model to simulate the generation of
fragments produced by in-orbit breakups. NASA's standard breakup model is the most
popular fragment generation model at present. The implementation is following the process
presented in paper [14,15].
Collision probability estimation
When considering the fragmentation due to in-orbit collisions, there is a key component in
the space debris evolution model, that is the collision probability estimation algorithm. In
SOLEM, we adopt an Improved-CUBE (I-CUBE) model to do the calculation of collision
probabilities [16]. It is based on the CUBE method proposed by NASA [17,18].
In CUBE model, the evolution system is uniformly sampled in time. At each sampling
moment, the space around the Earth is discretized in small cubes in geocentric cartesian
coordinates. By obtaining updated orbital elements, the location of each space objects is
calculated. CUBE model assumes that the collision probability only exists between objects
residing in the same cube. And the collision probability is calculated by
(1)
where
and
are the spatial densities of objects
and
in the cube,
is the collision
cross-section,
is collision speed,
is the volume of the cube, and
is the time
interval between two sampling moments.
during the propagation time interval
. The time interval
calculated by Equation 1 is the mean number of collisions between objects
Actually,
is
in the volume
and
seconds. As it does not approach to 0, for some objects with
given as 5 days, i.e.
collision cross-section
will reach to greater than 1. That is
not reasonable. To avoid this, in I-CUBE model, we used Equation 2 to express the collision
probability with the consideration that the collision process follows a Poisson distribution.
large enough, the value of
(2)
4
ijijcimpPssAVdUdt=isjsijcAimpVdUdtijPijdUdtdt54.3210cAijP1exp()ijijcimpPccssAVdUdt=−−=
Hindawi Template version: May18
where
represents the collision probability, and
is the mean number of collisions
between objects
and
in the volume
during the propagation time interval
.
According to Heiner Klinkrad [19], the approximation
yields results with less than
. That means for
10% error for
than 10%. For most space objects, the approximation is well suited. But for those with
collision cross-sections large enough (dozens or even hundreds of square meters), the
collision probability may be greatly over estimated if still using the approximation.
, the approximation will bring error bigger
Besides, CUBE model assumes that only the objects residing in the same cube are considered
for collisions. For space debris evolution, the divided cube size is given as 10 km. However,
it has been queried by CNES for the effects on evolution results from the divided cube size
[20,21]. In I-CUBE model, we assume that collision probability exists in all close approaches
with a distance from the target satisfying the threshold. The distance threshold is the diagonal
of the divided cube. Thus, the value of
in Equation 1 is no longer the volume of cube, but
the volume of a sphere with radius equal to the distance threshold, i.e.
(3)
Where
is the divided cube size. As
relates to the spatial densities,
and
are now
the spatial densities of objects
representation is illustrated in Figure 3.
and
in the volume of the sphere. The two-dimensional
Figure 3: Two-dimensional representation for considering possible collisions between debris residing in
neighbouring cubes.
5
ijPcijdUdtijPc0.2c0.2cdU()3343433dUhh==hdUisjsij
Hindawi Template version: May18
In this approach, the divided cube size will never influence the evolution result of space
debris evolution models. The comparison results using CUBE and I-CUBE model running by
SOLEM are presented in Figure 4. The divided cube size
Except for the divided cube size, all the other configurations are the same. Every curve is the
average result of 50 Monte Carlo runs.
varies from 5 km to 50 km.
a b
Figure 4: Comparison of simulation results with different cube size. (a) Using CUBE model. (b) Using
I-CUBE model
Future launch activities
The launch of spacecraft in future is another important source of space debris increase.
However, it is highly related with technical development and space policies which can't be
predicted. Therefore, the future launch model usually takes the current launch level as a
reference. The data of a launch model includes all the characteristics of launched objects,
such as the launched number, each object's type, mass, area or/and size, target orbit, launch
time, etc.
In SOLEM model, we adopt the launch traffic during the last 8 years, from September 1,
2009 to August 31, 2017, as future launch model. It will be repeated during the overall
simulation time. The traffic data is collected mainly from websites of Space Launch Report
[22], Space Track [23] and Union of Concerned Scientists [24]. It is prepared previously as a
configuration file containing the information of launched numbers, types (including satellites,
rocket bodies and mission related objects), each object's mass, area (or/and size), target orbit,
launch date, etc.
Post-mission disposal
Post-Mission Disposal (PMD) is an important mitigation measure to stop space debris
population from growing. In SOLEM model, PMD measures are implemented on non-
functional satellites and rockets launched during the evolution time. For newly launched
satellites, the mission life is uniformly set as 8 years by default. It can also be set as other
values by user. For rockets, the mission life will end at once when the carried satellites are
sent into the target orbits. When the mission life of a satellite or rocket ends, the natural
orbital lifetime will be estimated. If the natural orbital lifetime exceeds 25 years, the satellite
or upper stage of the rocket will be deorbited to a disposed orbit that will naturally decay
6
h
Hindawi Template version: May18
within 25 years, complying with the 25-year rule. The PMD success rate in SOLEM can be
set freely by users. Currently this value is estimated lower than 20% for region above 600
km. The procedure of PMD is showed in Figure 5.
Figure 5: The procedure of PMD. For mission ended satellites or rockets (R/Bs), if the evaluated natural
orbital lifetime excesses 25 years, it will be disposed to a new orbit complying the 25-year rule.
Active debris removal
To better limit the growth of LEO space debris populations, measures of Active Debris
Removal (ADR) are suggested. Although the ADR has not become practical due to the
technical difficulties and high costs, its effects on space debris evolution has been proved
through computer simulations. Considering the developing technology, ADR will be another
important measure in stopping the growth of the space debris population in future. As
suggested, ADR measure is to remove existing large and massive objects from regions where
high collision activities are expected [25]. The selection criteria that should be used in
choosing which objects to remove has also been researched, and the criterion based on the
mass and collision probability of each object has been proposed [26,27,28]. By annually
removing several targets, the space environment can be stabilized according to computer
simulations.
In SOLEM model, the selection criterion is implemented as follows:
(8)
where
is the mass of object
,
is the cumulated collision probabilities between object
and object
where
during the last year. Their product
is the selection index for
ADR. The larger the value of
, the more dangerous the object
.
At the beginning of each projection year, all objects in orbit are sorted in descending order by
the value of
. A pre-defined number of space debris with the largest
s will be
immediately removed from orbits. Only the operating satellites and objects with high
eccentricity orbits are excluded. The beginning year of implementing ADR measures is set by
users. In SOLEM, it is set as 2030 by default.
7
iijiRpm=imiijpijjiiRiRiiRiR
The initial population
Hindawi Template version: May18
Space objects initial population is the baseline of space debris evolution model. It is the
description of current space environment. For SOLEM, the population data on 2017.09.01 is
used as initial population. Just like the future launch model, the information of Space objects
is obtained from Space Track, Space Launch Report and Union of Concerned Scientists. The
orbital distribution and the Area-to-Mass Ratio (A/M) VS. size distribution are shown in
Figures 6 and 7.
Figure 6: The semi-major axis VS. eccentricity distribution of population data of 2017.09.01.
Figure 7: The A/M VS. size distribution of population data of 2017.09.01.
The workflow of SOLEM model
The workflow of SOLEM model is simply represented by Figure 8. As presented, before
projection, initialization will be done first by setting key parameters which are based on
simulated assumptions and taking prepared initial population data as input. All space objects
contained in the initial population are propagated after initialization. As time evolves, the
newly launched objects from future launch model, will also be propagated. If the newly
launched active satellite or rocket ends its mission, the PMD measure will be done. All space
8
Hindawi Template version: May18
objects with size over 10 cm are included for collision consideration. Once a collision
happens, the breakup model will be used to generate new fragments. And the population for
next propagation step will be updated.
Figure 8: The workflow of SOLEM model.
Model Application
As key parameters of each module are flexible to users, SOLEM model is able to simulate the
evolution of space debris under various assumptions with high flexibility. Since 2015,
SOLEM, as a representative of CNSA, has participated in a joint research of IADC. With
uniform input data and assumptions, SOLEM has achieved results consistent with other space
debris evolution models (IADC internal reports). In this paper, the effects of different
mitigation measures on space debris evolution are analyzed with the SOLEM model.
9
InitializationOrbit propagationCollision probability estimationInitial populationFuture launchEvolution end?YNYNKey parametersCollision?Breakup model =>New fragments(active satellite & R/Bs) Mission end?NPost-mission disposalYUpdate populationActive debris removalOut put· Number distribution· A/M distribution· Delta V distribution· Area, mass· Number evolution· Density-time/altitude distribution· Cumulated collisions· Number of collisions-altitude distribution stopBegin· Mission life of Satellites· PMD success rate· Annually ADR number· ADR beginning year etc.
Input Data
Hindawi Template version: May18
The initial input data and relevant assumptions are shown in Table 1. Three scenarios are
performed with PMD rate setting as 30%, 60% and 90%, and the other input data and
assumptions are all the same. For each scenario, 50 Monte Carlo simulation runs are
performed to obtain the averages.
Table 1. Assumptions of scenarios simulated by SOLEM model.
Items
Initial population data
Future launch model
Descriptions
2017.09.01, 10 cm and larger objects, crossing LEO
The launch traffic from 2009.09.01 to 2017.08.31,
repeated during overall simulation time
8 years
Satellite mission life
Collision avoidance maneuvers no
no
Station keeping
100%
Passivation rate
PMD rate
30%, 60%, 90%
no
ADR
Collision energy E>40 J/g, catastrophic collisions; else,
Collision types
non-catastrophic collisions
200 years
50 MC
Evolution time
MC runs
The solar activity used in SOLEM for future evolution is shown in Figure 9. It is generated
according to the monthly fit formula offered by CelesTrak website [12]. The geomagnetic
index is set as a constant median value of Ap=9.
Figure 9: The solar activity recorded in history (green line, noted as real) and the solar activity model adopted in
SOLEM (purple line).
10
Simulation Results
Hindawi Template version: May18
In the evolution results, space objects are classified into three types: (1) Intacts, includes all
satellites, R/Bs, and mission-related objects; (2) Old fragments, means all the DEB already
existed in the initial population; (3) New fragments, means all the DEB generated during the
evolution time. Separating new fragments from old fragments can help us have a clear view
of the increasing process of space debris population.
The space debris evolution results of the scenario setting PMD rate as 30% is presented in
Figure 10. It is the average result of 50 Mont-Carlo runs by SOLEM. As Figure 10 shows, the
total number of objects in LEO shows a decrease in the first two decades and then turns into
increase throughout the evolution time and finally reaches to more than 115% of the initial
population. This scenario predicts 34 catastrophic collisions and 25 non-catastrophic
collisions in average in future 200 years.
a b
Figure 10: The evolution results of scenario 1, with PMD rate of 30%. (a) The population evolution. The line of
Total is plot with the error bar of 1σ standard deviation. (b) The cumulative number of collisions.
a b
Figure 11: The evolution results of scenario 2, with PMD rate of 60%. (a) The population evolution. The line of
Total is plot with the error bar of 1σ standard deviation. (b) The cumulative number of collisions.
11
Hindawi Template version: May18
a b
Figure 12: The evolution results of scenario 3, with PMD rate of 90%. (a) The population evolution. The line of
Total is plot with the error bar of 1σ standard deviation. (b) The cumulative number of collisions.
Figure 11 shows the evolution results of the scenario setting PMD rate as 60%. The
reinforcement of such mitigation measure making the final effective number of LEO objects
in future 200 years decrease greatly comparing with the baseline scenario. The final total
effective number of LEO objects is only 23% more than the initial population. And the
cumulative number of collisions also decrease greatly in both collision types.
In Figure 12, the evolution result shows, with PMD rate of 90%, there is a clear decrease by
approximately 30% in total effective number of space objects crossing LEO orbits for next 50
years, and then the population remains at a long-term stable level. The decrease in the first 50
years is mainly due to the natural decay of old fragments. The number of new fragments
generated by breakup events increases in nearly the whole evolution time with a low rate, and
finally seems to stop increasing at the end of evolution. The cumulative number of
catastrophic collisions is decreased down to 15, and for non-catastrophic collisions the
number is only 7. Generally, this scenario predicts a space debris environment becoming
better with PMD rate as high as 90%.
Simulation results of the three scenarios are quantified in Table 2. It can be seen that, with
PMD rate increases, the space debris population after 200 years will greatly decrease, as well
as the average catastrophic collision rates. High PMD rates will make the current space
environment become better and safer.
Table 2. Quantification of evolution results of the three scenarios simulated by SOLEM model.
simulations
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Scenario 3
PMD
rate
30%
60%
90%
% of Variation wrt Initial
population after 200 years
Average catastrophic
collision rate in future
+115%
+23%
-30%
1/6 years
1/8 years
1/13 years
Taking the IADC comparison study about "Stability of the Future Leo Environment" [9,10]
as a reference, the evolution results shown above look rather optimistic. The IADC
comparison study predicted about +30% changes in population after 200 years and one
catastrophic collision every 5 to 9 years with PMD rate of 90%. And we predict -30% change
12
Hindawi Template version: May18
in population and one catastrophic collision every 13 years with the same PMD compliance
level.
That might be mainly due to the differences in solar activity model and the input initial
population used for simulation. The solar activity used in this paper (Figure 9) is in a higher
level than those used in references [9,10] which is shown in Figure 13. This will make more
objects decay during the evolution. Besides, the initial population we used in this paper is
obtained from the public data on 2017.09.01, which is about 13000 space objects. While the
initial population used in references [9,10] is the reference population of MASTER2009 on
2009.05.01, which is about 17000 space objects. The difference in initial population is as
high as about 24%. Additionally, the area-to-mass ratio distribution of the initial population
in this paper (Figure 7) is also different from reference [9,10] which is shown in Figure 14.
From the area-to-mass ratio distribution of the initial population, it can be seen that the initial
population we used do not exclude those objects with high area-to-mass ratio.
The differences in solar activity projection and initial population including both the number
and area-to-mass ratio finally leads to a very different evolution result.
Figure 13: Solar flux projections used in IADC comparison study.
Figure 14: Area-to-Mass ratio distributions of the initial population used in IADC comparison study.
13
Summary and future work
Hindawi Template version: May18
This paper mainly introduced the composition, sub-model algorithm, and workflow of
SOLEM, the space debris long-term evolution model of China. The reliability of SOLEM has
been validated during the joint research of IADC. After that, the application work of SOLEM
model on analyzing the effects of different mitigation measures on the evolution of space
environment are presented. Result shows with higher PMD rate, the current space
environment will become better and safer.
SOLEM is a LEO space debris evolution model with high flexibility. It is capable of
simulating the space environment evolution with various assumptions. Therefore, it can be
used to simulate and analyze the uncertainties affecting the space debris evolution, such as
the future launches, solar activities, manual collision avoidance measures, mitigation and
remediation measures, and so on. Through simulation and analyzation, SOLEM can help us
to deeply understand the evolution process of space environment and provides technical
supports for making space policies and laws to guarantee the sustainability of space activities
in future.
At present, the orbital range covered by SOLEM is limited to LEO region from 200 km to
2000 km. In the next step, the orbital range covered by SOLEM will be expanded from LEO
region to GEO (Geostationary Earth Orbit) region. Besides, the post-mission disposal model
will be optimized, including the disposed orbit selection process and the computation time.
Conflicts of Interest
No.
Funding Statement
The work presented in this paper is supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (grant
number 11503044) and Space Debris Research Project (grant numbers KJSP2016010101,
KJSP2016020201, KJSP2016020301, KJSP2016020101).
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Cui Shuang-xing, Cheng Hao-wen, Zhang Yao, Yang Zhi-tao, Shen Dan, Wu
Xiang-bin and other colleagues for the discussion and help during the establishment of
SOLEM model.
References
[1] https://www.space-track.org/, Access 2018.03
[2] Liou J -C, Johnson N L (2006) Risks in space from orbiting debris. Science 311 (5759):
340-341
[3] Liou J -C, Hall D T, Krisko P H, et al. (2004) LEGEND -- a three-dimensional LEO-to-
GEO debris evolutionary model. Adv. Space Res. 34: 981-986
[4] Lewis H G, Horbury T (2013) Implications of prolonged solar minimum conditions for
the space debris population. Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Space Debris,
14
Hindawi Template version: May18
Darmstadt, Germany, April 22-25, 2013. (ESA SP-723, August 2013)
[5] Dolado-Perez J C, Di-Costanzo R, Revelin B (2013) Introducing MEDEE -- a new orbital
debris evolution model. Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Space Debris,
Darmstadt, Germany, April 22-25, 2013. (ESA SP-723, August 2013)
[6] Martin C E, Cheese J E, Klinkrad H (2004) Space debris environment analysis with
DELTA2.0. Paper presented at the 55th International Astronautical Congress, Vancouver,
Canada, 2004
[7] Jonas Radtke, Enrico Stoll, Hugh Lewis, et al. (2017) The impact of the increase in small
satellite launch traffic on the long-term evolution of the space debris environment. Paper
presented at the 7th European Conference on Space Debris, Darmstadt, Germany, April 18-
21, 2017
[8] S. Kawamoto, T. Hirai, S. Kitajima, et al. (2018) Evaluation of Space Debris Mitigation
Measures Using a Debris Evolutionary Model. JSASS Aerospace Tech. Japan, Vol 16,No.7,
pp.599-603
[9] Report of IADC Study, (2013) Stability of the Future Leo Environment, IADC-12-08
[10] Liou, J.-C., Anilkumar, A. K., Bastida Virgili, B., et al. (2013) Stability of the Future
LEO Environment - An IADC Comparison Study. Proceedings of the 6th European
Conference on Space Debris, Darmstadt, Germany, April 22-25, 2013 (ESA SP-723, August
2013)
[11] Dolado-Perez J C, Revelin B, Di-Costanzo R (2014) Sensitivity analysis of the long-
term evolution of the space debris population in LEO. Paper presented at the 65th
International Astronautical Congress, Toronto, Canada, IAC-14-A6.2.3, 2014.
[12] http://celestrak.com/SpaceData/, Access 2018.08
[13] https://www.space-track.org/, Access 2015.12
[14] Johnson N L, Krisko P H, Liou J -C, et al. (2001) NASA's new breakup model of
EVOLVE 4.0. Adv. Space Res. 28:1377-1384
[15] Krisko P H (2011) Proper implementation of the 1998 NASA Breakup Model. Orbital
Debris Quarterly News, 15(4), October 2011
[16] Wang X W, Liu J, Cui S X (2018) A collision probability estimation algorithm used in
the space debris evolution model, submitted to Journal of Astronautics
[17] Liou J -C, Kessler Don J, Matney M, et al. (2003) A new approach to evaluate collision
probabilities among Asteroids, Comets, and Kuiper Belt objects. Lunar and Planetary
Science, XXXIV, 1828
[18] Liou J -C (2006) Collision activities in the future orbital debris environment. Adv. Space
Res. 38: 2102-2106
[19] Klinkrad H (2006) Space debris models and risk analysis. Chichester: Springer
published in association with Praxis Publishing
[20] Dolado-Perez J C, Revelin B. Sensitivity analysis of MEDEE to computation hypothesis.
15
Hindawi Template version: May18
The 32nd Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee Meeting, Beijing, China, May
12-15, 2014.
[21] Dolado-Perez J C, Revelin B, Di-Costanzo R. Sensi-tivity analysis of the long-term
evolution of the space debirs population in LEO. The 65th International Astronautical
Congress, IAC-14-A6.2.3, 2014
[22] http://www.spacelaunchreport.com, Access 2017.09
[23] https://www.space-track.org/, Access 2017.09
[24] https://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear-weapons/space-weapons/satellite-database#., Access
2017.09
[25] Liou J -C, Johnson N L (2008) Instability of the present LEO satellite populations. Adv.
Space Res. 41: 1046-1053
[26] Liou J -C, Johnson N L (2009) A sensitivity study of the effectiveness of active debris
removal in LEO. Acta Astronautica 64: 236-243
[27] Lewis H G, Swinerd G G, Newland R J, et al. (2009) Active removal study for on-orbit
debris using DAMAGE. Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Space Debris,
Darmstadt, Germany, March 30 - April 2, 2009. (ESA SP-672, July 2009)
[28] Liou J -C, Johnson N L, Hill N M (2010) Controlling the growth of future LEO debris
populations with active debris removal. Acta Astronautica 66: 648-653
16
|
1308.4688 | 2 | 1308 | 2013-11-21T15:11:58 | Overstable Librations can account for the Paucity of Mean Motion Resonances among Exoplanet Pairs | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | We assess the multi-planet systems discovered by the Kepler satellite in terms of current ideas about orbital migration and eccentricity damping due to planet-disk interactions. Our primary focus is on mean motion resonances. Only a few percent of planet pairs are in close proximity to a resonance. However, predicted migration rates (parameterized by $\tau_n=n/{|\dot n|}$) imply that during convergent migration most planets would have been captured into first order resonances. Eccentricity damping (parameterized by $\tau_e=e/{|\dot e|}$) offers a plausible resolution. Estimates suggest $\tau_e/\tau_n\sim (h/a)^2\sim 10^{-2}$, where $h/a$ is the ratio of disk thickness to radius. Together, eccentricity damping and orbital migration give rise to an equilibrium eccentricity, $e_{eq}\sim(\tau_e/\tau_n)^{1/2}$. Capture is permanent provided $e_{eq}\lesssim \mu^{1/3}$, where $\mu$ denotes the planet to star mass ratio. But for $e_{eq}\gtrsim \mu^{1/3}$, capture is only temporary because librations around equilibrium are overstable and lead to passage through resonance on timescale $\tau_e$. Most Kepler planet pairs have $e_{eq}>\mu^{1/3}$. Since $\tau_n>> \tau_e$ is the timescale for migration between neighboring resonances, only a modest percentage of pairs end up trapped in resonances after the disk disappears. Planet pairs close to a mean motion resonance typically exhibit period ratios 1-2% larger than those for exact resonance. The direction of this shift undoubtedly reflects the same asymmetry that requires convergent migration for resonance capture. Permanent resonance capture at these separations from exact resonance would demand $\mu (\tau_n/\tau_e)^{1/2}\gtrsim 0.01$, a value that estimates of $\mu$ from transit data and $(\tau_e/\tau_n)^{1/2}$ from theory are insufficient to match. Plausible alternatives involve eccentricity damping during or after disk dispersal. (Abridged) | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph |
Overstable Librations can account for the Paucity of Mean
Motion Resonances among Exoplanet Pairs
Peter Goldreich1,2 and Hilke E. Schlichting3
[email protected]
ABSTRACT
We assess the multi-planet systems discovered by the Kepler satellite in terms
of current ideas about orbital migration and eccentricity damping due to planet-
disk interactions. Our primary focus is on first-order mean motion resonances,
which we investigate analytically to lowest order in eccentricity. Only a few
percent of planet pairs are in close proximity to a resonance. However, predicted
migration rates (parameterized by τn = n/ n) imply that during convergent
migration most planets would have been captured into first order resonances.
Eccentricity damping (parameterized by τe = e/ e) offers a plausible resolution.
Estimates suggest τe/τn ∼ (h/a)2 ∼ 10−2, where h/a is the ratio of disk thickness
to radius. Together, eccentricity damping and orbital migration give rise to
an equilibrium eccentricity, eeq ∼ (τe/τn)1/2. Capture is permanent provided
eeq . µ1/3, where µ denotes the planet to star mass ratio. But for eeq & µ1/3,
capture is only temporary because librations around equilibrium are overstable
and lead to passage through resonance on timescale τe. Most Kepler planet pairs
have eeq > µ1/3. Since τn ≫ τe is the timescale for migration between neighboring
resonances, only a modest percentage of pairs end up trapped in resonances after
the disk disappears. Thus the paucity of resonances among Kepler pairs should
not be taken as evidence for in situ planet formation or the disruptive effects of
disk turbulence.
Planet pairs close to a mean motion resonance typically exhibit period ra-
tios 1-2% larger than those for exact resonance. The direction of this shift un-
doubtedly reflects the same asymmetry that requires convergent migration for
resonance capture. Permanent resonance capture at these separations from ex-
act resonance would demand µ(τn/τe)1/2 & 0.01, a value that estimates of µ
1California Institute of Technology, MC 150-21, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
2Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA), AB(Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton,
NJ 08540, USA
3Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307, USA
-- 2 --
from transit data and (τe/τn)1/2 from theory are insufficient to match. Plausible
alternatives involve eccentricity damping during or after disk dispersal.
The overstability referred to above has applications beyond those considered
in this investigation. It was discovered numerically by Meyer & Wisdom (2008)
in their study of the tidal evolution of Saturns satellites.
Subject headings: celestial mechanics -- methods: analytical -- methods: numer-
ical -- planetdisk interactions -- planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and
stability -- planets and satellites: formation
1.
INTRODUCTION
As of January 2013, more than 3000 planet candidates have been discovered by the
Kepler spacecraft and over 1000 of these reside in systems that contain more than one planet
(Batalha et al. 2013). Thanks to these remarkable findings, we now have a large statistical
sample of multi-planet systems. Their architectures contain important clues concerning
planet formation and dynamical evolution. Kepler multi-planet systems display the following
characteristics:
• Most planets do not reside in or close to mean motion resonances as shown in Figure
1 (Fabrycky et al. 2012).
• There is a significant excess of planet pairs with period ratios close to but slightly
larger (by 1-2%) than that for exact resonance (see Figure 1 and Fabrycky et al. (2012)).
Several papers have been published offering explainations for the 1-2% offset from mean
motion resonance (e.g. Lithwick & Wu 2012; Batygin & Morbidelli 2013; Petrovich et al.
2013; Baruteau & Papaloizou 2013). Our investigation has a different focus. We aim to
explain why mean motion resonances are rare. This is surprising because planet-disk in-
teractions leading to orbit migration are expected to result in efficient resonance capture
(see section 2.2 and Figure 4). However, we show that for most Kepler planet pairs, reso-
nance capture is only temporary. The reason is that librations about exact resonance are
overstable and lead to passage through resonance on the eccentricity damping timescale
which is about two orders of magnitude shorter than that for semi-major axis migration (e.g
Goldreich & Tremaine 1980; Ward 1988).
This paper is structured as follows. §2 focuses on the planar, circular, restricted three-
body problem in the vicinity of a mean motion resonance including resonance capture in the
presence of semi-major axis migration and eccentricity damping and the evolution within and
-- 3 --
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2+3+4+5 Planet Systems
2+3+4+5 Planet Systems
2+3+4+5 Planet Systems
2+3+4+5 Planet Systems
2+3+4+5 Planet Systems
2+3+4+5 Planet Systems
2+3+4+5 Planet Systems
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
25
20
15
10
5
N
0
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
P2P1
3.0
3.5
Fig. 1. -- Histogram showing the period ratios of Kepler planet candidates residing in mul-
tiple planet systems as of January 2013. The bin sizes are 0.025. The locations of dominant
mean motion resonances are indicated by dashed black lines. Most planets do not reside
in or close to resonances. However, there is a significant excess of planet pairs with period
ratios slightly larger than those for exact mean motion resonances.
-- 4 --
escape from resonance. We show that together, eccentricity damping and orbit migration
give rise to an equilibrium eccentricity and that librations around equilibrium are overstable
for the majority of Kepler planet masses and lead to passage through resonance. We extend
our model to the planar, three-body problem in §3. Results derived from our model are
compared with properties of multi-planet systems discovered by the Kepler Spacecraft in §4.
In §5 we discuss reasons for the departure from exact resonance and show that our resonance
model yields an excess of pairs with slightly greater than exact resonant period ratios, but
that the magnitude of the offset from exact resonance is on average too small to match
observations. We compare our findings with previous works that aim to explain the period
offset. Our main conclusions are summarized in §6
2. Resonance in the Circular Restricted Three-Body Problem with
Dissipation
Consider a system of two planets in orbit around a host star. Assume that the outer
planet moves on a fixed circular orbit. Close to a first order j + 1 : j mean motion resonance,
the dominant term in the inner planet's disturbing function has resonant argument φ such
that
φ = (j + 1)λ′ − jλ − ,
φ = (j + 1)n′ − jn − ,
φ = −j n − ,
(1)
where primes distinguish the outer planet and λ, n, and denote mean longitude, mean mo-
tion and longitude of pericenter. At conjunction, λ′ = λ so φ is a measure of the displacement
of the longitude of conjunction from the inner planet's pericenter.
Lagrange's equations of motion to first order in eccentricity for the inner planet in the
vicinity of the resonance read
n = 3jβµ′en2 sin φ −
n
τn
+ p
e2n
τe
,
e = βµ′n sin φ −
e
τe
,
= −
βµ′
e
n cos φ ,
(2)
(3)
(4)
e (cid:19)2
φ = −3j 2βµ′en2 sin φ−(cid:18) βµ′n
where e and a are eccentricity and semi-major axis, µ′ is the ratio of the outer planet's mass
to that of the star, and β ≈ 0.8j. Although we first examine resonance dynamics without
dissipation, terms describing tidally induced migration and eccentricity damping are included
cos φ sin φ−
βµ′n
eτe
n
τn − 3j
e2n
τe
βµ′n
e
sin φ φ +
cos φ + j
, (5)
2
k(φ, e2) =(cid:18)3
H(φ, e2) =(cid:18)ke2 −
j 2e2 −
βµ′
e
cos φ(cid:19) +
φ
n
,
3
4
j 2e4 + 2βµ′e cos φ(cid:19) .
(6)
(7)
-- 5 --
in order to avoid having to repeat these equations later on. The final term in equation (2)
accounts for the contribution of eccentricity damping to changes in mean motion. For the
particular case of eccentricity damping arising from energy dissipation at constant angular
momentum, as applies to tides raised in a planet by its parent star, p ≈ 3. For simplicity, we
assume p = 3 throughout the body of our paper but provide results applicable for general
p > 0 in the Appendix.
For the remainder of this subsection, we neglect both migration and eccentricity damping
and work in the limit τn & τe → ∞. Then equations (2)-(4) admit two integrals1
and
The integral k exists because with only one resonant argument, variations of n and e are
related. H, the Jacobi constant, is also the Hamiltonian with canonically conjugate momen-
tum, e2, and coordinate, φ.
The topology of the phase-space as defined by H for fixed k changes abruptly across
k = kcrit, where
kcrit =
34/3
2
(jβµ′)2/3 ∼ j 4/3µ′2/3 .
(8)
For k < kcrit, there is one (stable) fixed point whereas there are three (two stable and one
unstable) fixed points for k > kcrit.2 These distinct topologies are illustrated in Figure 2.
For k > kcrit the level curve emanating from the unstable fixed point is appropriately called
a separatrix because it separates the regions surrounding the two stable fixed points. The
stable fixed point at
φ = 0 and e0 =
2
j 2/3 (cid:18)βµ′
3 (cid:19)1/3(cid:18) k
kcrit(cid:19)1/2
=
βµ′n
jn − (j + 1)n′
(9)
is present for all k and corresponds to a periodic orbit with jn > (j + 1)n′. It is located
at the global maximum of H and owes its stability to the Coriolis acceleration in the frame
rotating with angular velocity n′. The other stable fixed point at
φ = π and emin =
1
j 2/3 (cid:18)βµ′
3 (cid:19)1/3(cid:18) k
kcrit(cid:19)1/2
(cid:0)cos θ − 31/2 sin θ(cid:1) =
βµ′n
(j + 1)n′ − jn
,
(10)
1In these integrals, n is evaluated at exact resonance except where it appears as part of φ.
2The fixed points correspond to the real roots of the expression for k = 0 with φ = 0.
-- 6 --
with
θ =
1
3
tan−1[(k/kcrit)3 − 1]
(11)
only appears for k > kcrit and describes a periodic orbit with jn < (j + 1)n′. It sits at a
local minimum of H. Finally, the unstable fixed point at
φ = π and e =
1
j 2/3 (cid:18)βµ′
3 (cid:19)1/3(cid:18) k
kcrit(cid:19)1/2
(cid:0)cos θ + 31/2 sin θ(cid:1) =
βµ′
(j + 1)n′ − jn
(12)
lies on a saddle point. The stable and unstable fixed points at φ = π bifurcate at k = kcrit
where ecrit = (βµ′/3j 2)1/3. These values correspond to the boundary between stable and
unstable linear oscillations around φ = π, e = βµ′n/((j + 1)n′ − jn) as can be verified from
equation (5).
In anticipation of later discussion, we make note of the asymmetry of the
stable fixed points on opposite sides of exact resonance.
Note that near resonance, e = O(µ′1/3) and d/dt = O(µ′2/3n). Thus the first and
second terms on the rhs of equation (5) dominate over the third for small amplitude libra-
tions (i.e., φ = δφ << 1). Moreover, librations of φ are centered on φ = 0, e = e0 (e.g.
Murray & Dermott 1999) where
From equation (5), it follows that the frequency of small librations, ω, satisfies
e0 =
βµ′n
jn − (j + 1)n′ .
ω2
e0 (cid:19)2
n2 = 3j 2βµ′e0 +(cid:18)βµ′
.
2.1. Planet-Disk Interactions
(13)
(14)
Up to this point, migration and eccentricity damping were merely parametrized by
their respective timescales τn and τe. For dissipation due a planet's interaction with a
protoplanetary disk, τn and τe are given by
1
τn ≡
1
τe ≡
1
n
1
e
dn
dt ∼ µµd(cid:16) a
h(cid:17)2
dt ∼ µµd(cid:16) a
h(cid:17)4
de
n ,
n ,
(15)
(16)
where µd = Σda2/M∗ is the disk to star mass ratio and h is the disk's scale height. Here we
have assumed that the planet's mass is too small for it to clear a gap in the disk.
-- 7 --
èè
3
1
Μ
Φ
n
i
S
e
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
3
1
Μ
Φ
n
i
S
e
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
**
èè
èè
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
eCosΦΜ13
eCosΦΜ13
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
3
4
Μ
H
He0
èè
10
He0
He0
He0
èè
Heesp
Heesp
Heesp
**
Hemin
Hemin
Hemin
èè
3
4
Μ
H
5
0
-5
-10
-3
-2
-1
0
eΜ13
1
2
3
-10
-3
-2
-1
1
2
3
0
eΜ13
Fig. 2. -- Contour plots of the Hamiltonian (top) and the corresponding cross section along
the sin φ = 0 axis (bottom) for k = 0.5kcrit (left) and k = 2kcrit (right). Negative values on
the bottom x-axes correspond to φ = π. Contours on the left are shown for H(e, φ)/µ4/3 ≃
2, 1, 0,−1,−3,−10. Those on the right correspond to H(e, φ)/µ4/3 ≃ 9, 7, 5,−1. Stable fixed
points are marked by blue circles and the unstable one by a red asterisk.
-- 8 --
The migration rate is based on the balance of torques at principal Lindblad resonances
located interior and exterior to the planet (Goldreich & Tremaine 1980; Ward 1986). Eccen-
tricity damping in a gapless disk is dominated by first order, coorbital Lindblad resonances
(Ward 1988; Artymowicz 1993). These come in pairs with individual members approxi-
mately equally spaced interior and exterior to the coorbital location. Consequently, each
pair damps the planet's orbital energy at nearly constant angular momentum. However,
remote first order Lindblad resonances along with coronation resonances also contribute to
eccentricity excitation and damping. Thus the coefficient p in equation (2) may deviate from
3. For example, the plant-disk model investigated by Tanaka & Ward (2004) yields p ∼ 1.3.
Overstable librations require that the final term in equation (2) be positive as shown by
equation (A2).
2.2. Capture Into Resonance
Next we consider conditions under which the inner planet would be captured into the 2:1
resonance if it were migrating outward at a rate n/n = 1/τn. Capture would be guaranteed
provided the orbital eccentricity of the inner body far from the resonance were sufficiently
small and the rate of outward migration sufficiently slow. Let us assume that the former
condition is satisfied. Then upon approach to resonance, the inner planet would stay close
to the stable fixed point at φ = 0 and e0 = βµ′n/(jn − (j + 1)n′). As the resonance is
approached, ω first decreases and then increases (see Fig. 3). Capture is most problematic
during passage through
34/3
ωmin
n
=
,
21/3 (jβµ′)2/3 ∼(cid:0)j 2µ′(cid:1)2/3
j (cid:19)1/3
3j 2 (cid:19)1/3
e0(ωmin) =(cid:18)2βµ′
2j(cid:19)1/3
=(cid:18) 3
(j + 1)n′
jn
,
∼(cid:18)µ′
(βµ′)2/3 ∼ j 1/3µ′2/3 .
(17)
(18)
(19)
at which point
and
∆n
n ≡ 1 −
To cross the resonance width, ∆n/n ∼ j 1/3µ′2/3 given by equation (19) while migrating at
rate n/n = 1/τn takes ∆t ∼ j 1/3µ′2/3τn. Capture would be assured provided ωmin∆t ∼
j 5/3µ′4/3nτn ≫ 1. Careful analytical and numerical calculations sharpen this result to
j 5/3µ′4/3nτn ≥ 2.5 .
(20)
For smaller τn, temporary capture could occur at larger separations from resonance where
ω > ωmin but the resonance lock would be broken before ωmin were reached. With τn given
ecap =(cid:18)AIsep
2π (cid:19)1/2
= 1.7(cid:18)βµ′
j 2 (cid:19)1/3
∼(cid:18) µ′
j (cid:19)1/3
,
(23)
by equation (15), the condition of certain capture becomes
-- 9 --
µ′ &
µ3
d
j 5 (cid:16) a
h(cid:17)6
.
(21)
Having defined sufficiently slow migration, we do the same for sufficiently small initial
eccentricity. The key is to make use of the adiabatic invariant
AI =IC
dφ e2 .
(22)
For motion on the separatrix at k = kcrit, it can be shown that AIsep = 12π(βµ′/3j 2)2/3.
Thus if well before a planet encounters the resonance, its orbital eccentricity were smaller
than
then at k = kcrit, H would be larger than Hsep and capture would be guaranteed.
Conditions for resonance capture appropriate to planets migrating in a protoplanetary
disk are displayed in Figure 4 as a function of the local disk and planet masses. The local
disk mass, µd, is that which resides within a factor of two of the planet's orbital radius. For
a total disk mass equal to 10−2M∗ distributed with a radial surface density profile ∝ a−1,
the local disk mass at 0.5 AU is two orders of magnitude smaller than the local disk mass at
50 AU. Figure 4 indicates that resonance capture will only occur for local disk masses less
than 10−3M∗. Thus in a typical disk with total mass 10−2M∗ and an a−1 surface density
profile, only planets within about 10AU would be caught into resonance. Figure 4 further
suggests planets with masses between those of Earth and Neptune which orbit within 1AU
have the best chances to capture smaller planets.
To a significant extent, the current situation regarding mean motion resonances among
pairs of exoplanets is analogous to that which pertained to mean motion resonances in the
satellite systems of Jupiter and Saturn more than half a century ago. A early paper by
Roy & Ovenden (1954) called attention to the overabundance of orbital resonances among
the satellite systems of Jupiter and Saturn. Goldreich (1965) showed that slow convergent
migration driven by tides raised in a planet would lead to the formation of mean motion
resonances stabilized by the transfer of angular momentum from the inner to the outer
satellite. Early work emphasized slow migration because it is appropriate to cases in which
tidal torques drive the expansion of satellite orbits. The probability of capture into reso-
nance for slow convergent migration was first solved by Yoder (1979). Subsequently, simpler
derivations emphasizing the role of adiabatic invariance were provided in Henrard (1982);
Borderies & Goldreich (1984). Recent investigations focused on the maximum migration
-- 10 --
Ω
Ω
Ω
n
n
n
= 3 j2 ΒΜ'e0+ ΒΜ'e0212
= 3 j2 ΒΜ'e0+ ΒΜ'e0212
= 3 j2 ΒΜ'e0+ ΒΜ'e0212
15.0
10.0
7.0
5.0
3.0
2.0
1.5
1.0
n
i
m
Ω
Ω
0.1
1
10
100
e0e0Ωmin
Fig. 3. -- Frequency of small amplitude libration about the stable fixed point as a function
of eccentricity, e0. Capture into resonance requires that the migration timescale across the
resonance be longer than the libration timescale. This condition is given by n/∆n . ωmin,
where ∆n is the resonance width.
-- 11 --
0.001
10-4
'
Μ
10-5
10-6
10-7
3
3
3
3
3
6 Μ d
6 Μ d
6 Μ d
6 Μ d
6 Μ d
Μ'~ ah
Μ'~ ah
Μ'~ ah
Μ'~ ah
Μ'~ ah
Μ' ~ Μ d
Μ' ~ Μ d
Μ' ~ Μ d
Μ' ~ Μ d
Μ' ~ Μ d
Jupiter
Jupiter
Jupiter
Jupiter
Jupiter
Neptune
Neptune
Neptune
Neptune
Neptune
Earth
Earth
Earth
Earth
Earth
0.0001
0.0002
0.0005
0.001
0.002
Μd
Fig. 4. -- Criteria for capture into the 2:1 resonance for planets migrating in a protoplanetary
disk as a function of disk to star mass ratio, µd ∼ Σda2/M∗, and planet to star mass ratio,
µ′. The solid black line delineates the lower boundary above which capture can occur as
expressed by equation (21). The dotted black line corresponds to equality of planet and
local disk mass. The effect of the disk on planet migration diminishes if the local disk mass
is less than the planet's mass. The yellow shaded area marks the parameter space within
which capture into resonance can take place. As indicated by equation (21), the minimum
value of µ′ required for capture into higher j resonances is lower than shown here.
-- 12 --
rate permitting capture. The analytic derivation by Friedland (2001) is in close agreement
with results from numerical experiments (Quillen 2006; Ogihara & Kobayashi 2013).
2.3. Evolution in Resonance in the Presence of Migration
Provided that the migration is sufficiently slow such that resonant capture occurs, the
orbital eccentricity e0 keeps growing on a timescale comparable to the migration timescale, τn,
as the planet moves deeper into resonance (e.g. Malhotra 1993; Lee & Peale 2002). Once the
eccentricity has grown to order unity, the system becomes unstable leading to passes through
resonance, collision or ejection (e.g. Lee & Peale 2002). Since the eccentricity growth in
resonance occurs on a timescale comparable to τn this implies that planets should share their
time roughly equally between residing in mean motion resonances and migrating between
them. Thus at any given time, about half of all planet pairs should occupy mean motion.
This implies that in the presence of migration that about half of all planet pairs should
occupy mean motion resonances at any given moment in time, which is not consist with the
observed period rations of Kepler planet pairs (see Figure 1). As we show below, eccentricity
damping provides a simple solution to this conundrum.
2.4. Effects of Eccentricity Damping
Evolution in resonance is very different in the presence of eccentricity damping. This is
because as the planet evolves deeper into resonance the associated increase in its eccentricity
can be balanced by a decrease due to eccentricity damping. Equations (2) and (3) imply the
existence of an equilibrium eccentricity and resonance phase angle given by
and
eeq =(cid:18)
τe
3(j + 1)τn(cid:19)1/2
sin φeq =
eeq
βµ′τen
.
(24)
(25)
No such equilibrium exists in the presence of migration alone.
In what follows we show that evolution in resonance with eccentricity damping and
migration has three possible outcomes which depend upon the values of βµ′ and τe/τn.
1) For
µ′ >
j
√3(j + 1)3/2β (cid:18) τe
τn(cid:19)3/2
,
(26)
-- 13 --
the planet is permanently trapped in resonance at the fixed point φ = φeq and e = eeq. An
example is shown in the upper panel of Figure 5.
2) For
j 2
8√3(j + 1)3/2β (cid:18) τe
τn(cid:19)3/2
< µ′ <
j
√3(j + 1)3/2β (cid:18) τe
τn(cid:19)3/2
,
(27)
the planet is permanently caught in resonance and its libration amplitude saturates at a
finite value. The middle panel of Figure 5 displays an example.
3) For
µ′ <
j 2
8√3(j + 1)3/2β (cid:18) τe
τn(cid:19)3/2
,
(28)
the planet is caught in resonance, but escapes on timescale τe. An example is provided in
the lower panel of Figure 5.
Note that the boundary between permanent capture and temporary capture leading to
escape shifts monotonically to smaller µ′ ∝ j −1/2 with increasing j. Moreover, the interme-
diate range of µ′ corresponding to finite amplitude librations shrinks with increasing j and
does not exist for j ≥ 8.
Figure 6 summarizes the three different outcomes for the evolution in resonance for
various planet to star mass ratios and as a function of τe/τn for a 2:1 mean motion resonance.
Below we derive analytic results for different evolutions in resonance.
2.4.1.
Instability: Transition from Damping to Growth
Linearizing equations (1) for φ, (2) for n, and (3) for e around the equilibrium given by
φeq and eeq and setting d/dt = s yields a system of three homogeneous linear equations in
the variables δφ, δn and δe. The determinant of the coefficient matrix is a cubic polynomial
in s with real coefficients whose roots are the eigenvalues. A standard exercise in algebra
reveals that one root is negative and that the other two are a complex conjugate pair. For
slow migration and eccentricity damping, ωτe ≫ 1 and ωτn ≫ 1, the imaginary parts of the
complex roots are essentially ±iω evaluated at e0 = eeq and the real part is well-approximated
by
s =
1
τe (cid:18) n
ωeq(cid:19)2 3jβµ′eeq −(cid:18)βµ′
eeq(cid:19)2! .
(29)
ΤeΤn=1200
-- 14 --
2.10
2.05
2.00
1.95
1
P
2
P
-0.02 0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.0
0.2
0.4
e CosΦ
ΤeΤn=1100
2.10
2.05
2.00
1.95
1
P
2
P
-0.02 0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.0
0.2
0.4
e CosΦ
ΤeΤn=150
2.10
2.05
2.00
1.95
1
P
2
P
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
-0.02
-0.04
-0.06
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
-0.02
-0.04
-0.06
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
-0.02
-0.04
-0.06
Φ
n
i
S
e
Φ
n
i
S
e
Φ
n
i
S
e
ΤeΤn=1200
0.8
1.0
1.2
0.6
nΤn
ΤeΤn=1100
0.8
1.0
1.2
0.6
nΤn
ΤeΤn=150
-0.02
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.0
0.2
0.4
e CosΦ
0.8
1.0
1.2
0.6
nΤn
Fig. 5. -- Examples of evolution in resonance for µ′ = 10−4, nτn = 105, and different values
of τe/τn. Left panel: Librations are centered on φeq ≃ eeq/(βµ′τen) and the offset of φ from 0
is clearly visible in each plot. In the upper panel, τe/τn = 0.005. The final state corresponds
to permanent resonant capture at φeq, eeq (case 1). In the middle panel, τe/τn = 0.01. The
libration amplitude grows and then saturates but again, resonant capture is permanent (case
2). In the bottom panel, τe/τn = 0.02. The libration amplitude grows and the separatrix is
crossed leading to damped inner circulation and escape from resonance (case 3). Right panel:
Evolution of the planet pair period ratio as a function of time corresponding to permanent
capture with no librations (case 1) top panel, to permanent capture with finite amplitude
librations (case 2) middle panel, and to temporary capture and escape (case 3) bottom panel.
Note, escape from resonance occurs on a timescale comparable to ∼ τe rather than τn.
-- 15 --
h
h
h
h
h
h
t
t
t
t
t
t
r
r
r
r
r
r
a
a
a
a
a
a
E
E
E
E
E
E
e
e
e
e
e
e
n
n
n
n
n
n
u
u
u
u
u
u
t
t
t
t
t
t
p
p
p
p
p
p
e
e
e
e
e
e
N
N
N
N
N
N
r
r
r
r
r
r
e
e
e
e
e
e
t
t
t
t
t
t
i
i
i
i
i
i
p
p
p
p
p
p
u
u
u
u
u
u
J
J
J
J
J
J
E sca p e thro u g h in n er C irc ulatio n
E sca p e thro u g h in n er C irc ulatio n
E sca p e thro u g h in n er C irc ulatio n
E sca p e thro u g h in n er C irc ulatio n
E sca p e thro u g h in n er C irc ulatio n
E sca p e thro u g h in n er C irc ulatio n
m plitu d e Libratio n
m plitu d e Libratio n
m plitu d e Libratio n
m plitu d e Libratio n
m plitu d e Libratio n
m plitu d e Libratio n
D a m p e d to Sta ble P oint
D a m p e d to Sta ble P oint
D a m p e d to Sta ble P oint
D a m p e d to Sta ble P oint
D a m p e d to Sta ble P oint
D a m p e d to Sta ble P oint
Finite A
Finite A
Finite A
Finite A
Finite A
Finite A
n
Τ
e
Τ
0.200
0.100
0.050
0.020
0.010
0.005
0.002
0.001
0.00001
0.0001
Μ'
0.001
0.01
Fig. 6. -- Different outcomes for the evolution in resonance for various valves of µ′ and τe/τn.
The solid blue line marks the transition from libration damping below to libration growth
above. The red dashed line corresponds to the transition from finite amplitude librations
below to escape from resonance above. Planet pairs with parameters that fall below the
dashed red line are permanently captured in resonance. The rest escape on a timescale
τe. The vertical lines show solar system planet to sun mass ratios for Earth, Neptune and
Jupiter. Note that for a given resonant planet pair, µ′ corresponds to the larger of the two
masses.
-- 16 --
Thus the evolution in resonance switches from damping to growth at eeq = (βµ′/3j)1/3. Since
eeq = (τe/(3(j + 1)τn))1/2, the libration amplitude grows if
µ′ <
j
√3(j + 1)3/2β (cid:18) τe
τn(cid:19)3/2
.
(30)
Furthermore, the growth timescale from equation (29) is of order τe. Thus, escape from
resonance, if it occurs, will happen on a timescale τe.
At a basic level, overstability can arise because e0 corresponds to a maximum of H
and eccentricity damping causes the system to slide downhill. It is necessary to dig a little
deeper to understand the origin of the transition from damping to overstability. Once again,
an adiabatic invariant comes into play, this time involving small librations around φ = 0, e =
e0.3 A simple calculation using equation (22) yields
AIe0 = 2πβµ′ n
ω0
e0Φ2 ,
(31)
where Φ is the amplitude of the libration and ω0 its frequency. For e0 ≪ µ′1/3, ω0/n ∼ µ′/e0
whereas for e0 ≫ µ′1/3, ω0/n ∼ (µ′e0)1/2. By itself, convergent migration results in a
monotonic increase of e0. The adiabatic invariant then implies that the libration amplitude
0 whereas for e0 ≫ µ′1/3, Φ ∝ e−1/4
decreases as e0 increases. But for e0 ≪ µ′1/3, Φ ∝ e−1
.
Eccentricity damping leads to an increase in Φ which migration can overcome for e0 ≪ µ′1/3
but not for e0 ≫ µ′1/3.
0
2.4.2. Escape from Resonance
Following capture in resonance, escape involves damping to the stable fixed point at
φ = π, e = emin. This can only occur if k > kcrit and involves crossing the inner branch
of the separatrix which leads to damped circulation about the enclosed fixed point. As
shown at the beginning of §2, the separatrix exists for e0 ≥ 2(βµ′/3j 2)1/3. Equating eeq =
(τe/(3(j + 1)τn))1/2 to e0 demonstrates that resonance escape can occur provided
µ′ <
j 2
8√3(j + 1)3/2β (cid:18) τe
τn(cid:19)3/2
.
(32)
Different outcomes for evolution in resonance as a function of βµ′ and τe/τn are illus-
trated in Figure 7 for the particular case of a 2 : 1 resonance. Plotted points show results
3This adiabatic invariant only applies for slow migration. It is broken by eccentricity damping.
-- 17 --
from direct numerical integrations of the resonant equations of motion and the solid and
dashed lines present our analytic results. The blue circles, which mark the transition from
damping to growth, are indistinguishable for τnn = 105 and τnn = 106 and are in accord
with our analytic limit (solid blue line). The black squares and red diamonds show the tran-
sition from finite amplitude growth to escape from resonance for τnn = 105 and τnn = 106,
respectively. Although the numerical results for τnn = 106 are in close agreement with our
analytic expression (dashed red line), those for τnn = 105 fall well below the analytic limit
for µ′ . 10−4. The latter is not surprising. These combinations of τn and µ′ do not conform
to the basic assumption of our analytic treatment, namely that damping only makes a small
perturbation to the dissipation free motion. In particular, we suspect that the problem in
this case is that the eccentricity damping timescale is comparable to the libration period.
3. The Planar Three-Body Problem: A More Realistic Example
So far we have assumed that the more massive outer planet moves on a fixed circular
orbit and that m1/m2 << 1.4 In this case there is only one resonant argument. Here we
investigate a scenario in which both the inner and outer planet are in resonance. We still
assume that the outer planet with mass m2 is the more massive one thus ensuring that type-I
migration is convergent (eqn. 15).
3.1. Two Planet System with Convergent Migration and Eccentricity
Damping
Consider two planets that orbit their host star in the vicinity of a 2:1 mean motion
resonance. The first order resonant terms in the disturbing function for a 2:1 mean motion
resonance for the inner and outer planets are, respectively,
R1 = αa2
1µ2n2
1 (−be1 cos φ1 + ce2 cos φ2)
(33)
and
R2 = a2
2µ1n2
(34)
where α = a1/a2 = 0.630, b = 1.190, and c = 0.428 and φ1 = 2λ2 − λ1 − 1 and φ2 =
2λ2 − λ1 − 2. In the presence of migration and eccentricity damping
1 (be1 sin φ1 − ce2 sin φ2) +
2 (−be1 cos φ1 + ce2 cos φ2) ,
n1 = −
= 3αµ2n2
∂R1
∂λ1
3n1e2
1
3n1e2
1
3
a2
1
+
n1
τn1
+
n1
τn1
+
τe1
,
(35)
τe1
4Subscript '1' and '2' denote quantities associated with the inner planet and outer planet, respectively.
-- 18 --
ae
e
e
e
e
e
n
n
n
n
n
u
u
u
u
u
t
t
t
t
t
p
p
p
p
p
e
e
e
e
e
N
N
N
N
N
n
n
n
n
n
Τ e Τ
Τ e Τ
Τ e Τ
Τ e Τ
Τ e Τ
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
= 2 4 Μ'3
= 2 4 Μ'3
= 2 4 Μ'3
= 2 4 Μ'3
= 2 4 Μ'3
ì
à
ae
ì
à
ae
ae
h
h
h
h
h
t
t
t
t
t
r
r
r
r
r
a
a
a
a
a
E
E
E
E
E
n
Τ
e
Τ
0.200
0.100
0.050
0.020
0.010
0.005
0.002
0.001
ae
r
r
r
r
r
e
e
e
e
e
t
t
t
t
t
i
i
i
i
i
p
p
p
p
p
u
u
u
u
u
J
J
J
J
J
ì
à
ae
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
Μ' 3
Μ' 3
Μ' 3
Μ' 3
Μ' 3
ì
à
ae
6
6
6
6
6
=
=
=
=
=
n
n
n
n
n
e Τ
e Τ
e Τ
e Τ
e Τ
Τ
Τ
Τ
Τ
Τ
ae
0.00001
ae
0.0001
Μ'
ae
0.001
0.01
Fig. 7. -- Outcomes for evolution in the 2 : 1 resonance as a function of µ′ and strength of
dissipation. The solid blue line corresponds to transition from librations damping (below)
to growing (above) as calculated analytically. The red dashed line corresponds to transition
from finite amplitude librations (below) to escape from resonance (above) calculated analyt-
ically in the limit that the damping timescale is long compared to the libration timescale.
The blue points represent numerical results for which the transition from damping to growth
occurred. Values obtained for both τnn = 105 and τnn = 106 are indistinguishable. Nu-
merical results for the transition from finite amplitude growth to escape from resonance are
marked by black squares for τnn = 105 and red diamonds for τnn = 106. Although the
transition from damping to growth seems insensitive to the strength of the dissipation, the
transition between finite amplitude libration and escape from resonance systemically departs
from the analytic prediction with decreasing µ′ for τnn = 105.
-- 19 --
n2 = −
3
a2
2
∂R2
∂λ2
+
n2
τn2
+
3n2e2
2
τe2
1
n1a2
1e1
1
n2a2
2e2
e1 = −
e2 = −
1 = −
= αbµ2n1 sin φ1 −
= −6µ1n2
2 (be1 sin φ1 − ce2 sin φ2) +
e1
e1
∂R1
∂1 −
τe1
τe1
e2
e2
∂R2
∂2 −
τe2
τe2
1
∂e1
n1a2
1e1
∂1
= −cµ1n2 sin φ2 −
cos φ1
= −αbµ2n1
,
,
,
e1
2 = −
1
n2a2
2e2
∂e2
∂1
= cµ1n2
cos φ2
e2
.
n2
τn2
+
3n2e2
2
τe2
,
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
Since we are dealing with a 2:1 mean motion resonance, φ1 = 2λ2 − λ1 − 1 and φ2 =
2λ2 − λ1 − 2, which simplify to φ1 = σ − 1 and φ2 = σ − 2 where
σ = 2n2 − n1 .
(41)
After substituting for φ1 and φ2, equations (35) to (41) yield a set of 7 first order differential
equations in the 7 independent variables σ, n1, n2, e1, e2, 1, 2.
If the planets are caught in an exact 2:1 mean motion resonance, 2n2 − n1 = 0 and
1 = 2 which implies
e1
e2
= 2
αb
c
µ2
µ1
.
(42)
Furthermore, in the presence of eccentricity damping, the librations of the resonant argument
are no longer centered exactly at φ1 = 0 and φ2 = π but are offset from 0 and π such that
sin φ1 =
e1
αbτe1µ2n1
,
sin φ2 = −
e2
cτe2µ1n2
.
(43)
Assuming that τe1/τe2 = τn1/τn2 = µ2/µ1, as expected for dissipation due to interactions
with a protoplanetary disk (see equations (15) and (16)), the condition 2n2 − n1 = 0 implies
e1 =(cid:18) τe1
6τn2(cid:19)1/2(cid:18)
(1 + µ1/(2αµ2))(1 + (c/b)2/(4α))(cid:19)1/2
1 − µ1/µ2
.
(44)
Figures 8 and 9 display the results of the numerical integration of equations (35)-(41). Figure
8 shows the evolution of the semi-major axis of the two planets. Convergent migration leads
to temporary capture into 2:1 mean motion resonance, but escape from this resonance occurs
after a few eccentricity damping timescales. Figure 9 displays the corresponding eccentricity
evolution of the two planets (solid lines) and the expected equilibrium eccentricity calculated
analytically in equations (42) and (44) (dashed lines). The numerical and analytical results
are in very good agreement.
-- 20 --
In the limit that µ1/µ2 << 1, equation (44) simplifies to
e1 =(cid:18) τe1
6τn2(cid:19)1/2(cid:18)
1
(1 + (c/b)2/(4α))(cid:19)1/2
≃ 0.98(cid:18) τe1
6τn2(cid:19)1/2
(45)
and the two-planet resonance problem reduces to a one-planet resonance problem in which
the inner planet migrates toward the outer one at the rate τn2 such that
n1 − 2 n2 = 3αbµ2n2
1e1 sin φ1 −
n1
τn2
+
3n1e2
1
τe1
.
(46)
The right hand side of above equation is identical to equation (2) except the migration rate
is that of the outer planet rather than that of the inner one. The equations of motion for
e1 and 1 remain unchanged as given by equations (37) and (39), respectively. Taking the
ratio of equations (15) and (16) yields
τe1
τn2 ∼(cid:18)h
a(cid:19)2(cid:18)µ2
µ1(cid:19) ,
(47)
which evaluates to about 0.01(µ2/µ1) for typical disk scale heights h/a ≈ 0.1. The results
of this section demonstrate that a simplified treatment of mean motion resonance based on
a single active planet is capable of revealing the essential features of the more complex two
planet dynamics provided τn is set equal to τn2 and τe is set to τe1.
3.2. Comparison with Results of other Numerical Integrations
The claim that the amplitude of librations about φeq , eeq grows for eeq > (βµ′/3j)1/3
is at the heart of our investigation. It is based on the analysis of a simple model in which
only resonant terms in the disturbing function of lowest order in e are retained. Naturally
we were interested in finding out whether the overstability had shown up in previous work.
To the best of our knowledge, the overstability was first discovered numerically by
Meyer & Wisdom (2008) when studying the tidal evolution of Saturn's satellites. Their
numerical results of the parameter range that leads to damping, finite amplitude growth,
and escape from resonance are in agreement with our analytic expressions.The fact that
Lee & Peale (2002) did not find any overstable librations for the GJ 876 planets is consistent
with our analytic findings, since the roughly Jupiter mass planets and the range of values
of τe/τn considered in their study should result in damping of librations and permanent
resonance capture. The equilibrium eccentricities that they find are somewhat larger than
predicted by our analytical results because higher than first order eccentricity terms are
-- 21 --
U
A
a
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.10
0.08
0
5000
10 000
15 000
20 000
time years
Fig. 8. -- Semi-major axis as a function of time for planet 1 (blue) and planet 2 (red).
Convergent migration leads to temporary capture into 2:1 mean motion resonance, but the
resonance is broken after a few eccentricity damping timescales, τe1 (eqn. 29). The physical
parameters used in the integration are µ1 = 9.7 × 10−6, µ2 = 4.8 × 10−5, mstar = 0.31M⊙,
τn1 = 2 × 105 years, τn2 = 4 × 104 years, τn1/τe1 = τn2/τe2 = 100.
-- 22 --
0.100
0.050
0.020
e
0.010
0.005
0.002
0.001
0
5000
10 000
15 000
20 000
time years
Fig. 9. -- Eccentricity as a function of time for planet 1 (blue) and planet 2 (red). The
solid lines are from integrations of the resonant equations of motion and the dashed lines
correspond to the analytic results given in equations (42) and (44) . The physical parameters
used in the integration are the same as in Figure 8.
-- 23 --
required to model the large observed eccentricities (i.e, e ? 0.255) of the GJ 876 system (see
also section 2 of Lee & Peale (2002)). Delisle et al. (2012) perform numerical simulations
of planets caught in 2:1 mean motion resonance but stop planet migration after 104 years
to model the disappearance of the disk. For the parameters used in their simulations, our
analytic expressions predict overstable librations leading to passage through resonance. Our
own integrations predict that Delisle et al. (2012) would have found escape from resonance
if they had extended the migration time for at least an additional 5000 years.
4. Comparison with Kepler Multi-Planet Systems
Our investigation implies that pairs of Kepler planets found close to resonance are com-
prised of those that were permanently captured and others that were temporarily captured
but were caught in resonance when the protoplanetary disk dispersed. Given plausible ranges
of µ and τe/τn, it is not surprising that these total only several percent of the pairs in multi-
planet systems. This argument rests on the assumption that semi-major axes are largely
frozen during and subsequent to disk dispersal.
Figures 10 and 11 plot the more massive planet to star mass ratio, µ′, as a function of
the planet pair mass ratio, m</m>, for all Kepler 2-planet systems known as of June 2013.
The subscripts < and > refer to the smaller and larger of the two planets, respectively.
These ratios were calculated based on the assumption that each planet has a mean density
of 2 g cm−3. Planet pairs above the dashed red lines are candidates for permanent capture in
the 2 : 1 (fig. 10) and 3 : 2 (fig. 11) resonance. Resonant arguments for those above the solid
red lines would be damped whereas those located below it would be overstable. Most of the
planet pairs lie below the dashed red lines. These might have undergone temporary capture
but would have escaped from resonance on timescale τe<. The fate of the pairs between the
dashed and solid lines is less certain. For many, the eccentricity damping timescale, τe<, is so
short that escape would be probable as found in our numerical integrations summarized in
Figure 7. Given that planet pairs which ultimately escape resonance only spend a time τe< in
each resonance but about a time τn> between successive resonances, the fraction temporarily
captured planet pairs in or near mean motion resonances is τe</τn> ∼ 0.01µ>/µ< which
evaluates to 3% for the Kepler 2-planet sample. Perhaps a comparable or even slightly
greater percent might have been permanently captured.
-- 24 --
'
Μ
0.01
0.001
10-4
10-5
10-6
10-7
0.02
0.05
0.10
0.20
0.50
1.00
m<m>
Fig. 10. -- Planet to Star mass ratio, µ′, as a function of the smaller to larger planet mass
ratio, m</m>, for all Kepler 2-planet systems known as of June 2013 (blue points). Large
green filled circles correspond to planet pairs with period ratios ranging from 1.99 to 2.075.
See Figure 1 for comparison. Planet pairs above the red dashed line can be permanently
captured into resonance. The solid red line marks the transition from damping to growth for
a 2:1 mean motion resonance as given by equation (44) assuming τe</τn< = τe>/τn> = 0.01.
Pairs located above the solid red line would have damped resonant arguments (9%), whereas
resonant arguments of those between the dashed and red lines should have undergone finite
amplitude librations (20%). The vast majority of pairs might have been temporarily captured
in resonances but would have subsequently escaped. Even many pairs located between the
dashed and solid lines might have only been captured temporarily as we found for systems
with short eccentricity damping timescales, τe<, in Figure 7.
-- 25 --
0.001
10-4
10-5
'
Μ
10-6
10-7
0.02
0.05
0.10
0.20
0.50
1.00
m<m>
Fig. 11. -- Same as for Figure 10 but for the 3:2 mean motion resonance. Large filled green
circles correspond to planet pairs with period ratios ranging from 1.5 to 1.55. See Figure 1
for comparison.
-- 26 --
5. Departure from Exact Resonance
Figure 1 shows that peaks associated with period ratios close to 2 : 1 and 3 : 2 are
systematically displaced to larger values by of order 1 − 2%. The direction of displacement
is almost certainly due to the asymmetry that requires convergent migration for capture in
resonance. However, its magnitude is less easily accounted for. This is illustrated in Figure
12 which shows that to match a 1% average offset from exact 2 : 1 resonance requires a
permanently captured test particle to be paired with a planet for which µ2 ∼ 4 × 10−4.
More generally, test particles paired in mean motion resonances with massive planets would
have period ratios offset from exact resonance by ∼ j 1/3µ2/3
(cf. eqn. 19). Petrovich et al.
(2013) arrive at similar mass requirements and scalings from a model in which planets grow
in mass at a prescribed rate without orbital migration or eccentricity damping. Period
offsets for planets temporarily caught in resonance that might remain close to resonance
after the disk dissipates would be smaller still. These considerations strongly suggest that
the departure from exact resonance observed in the Kepler data occurred either during or
after the protoplanetary disk disappeared.
2
Retreat from resonance could occur as a result of eccentricity damping provided it were
slow on the timescale of small amplitude librations about the fixed point at φ = 0, e = e0.
Several mechanisms come to mind. Prominent among them are tides raised by the star in the
planets as suggested by Lithwick & Wu (2012) and Batygin & Morbidelli (2013), dynamical
friction due to a residual particle disk, and the excitation of apsidal waves. Proposals involv-
ing tidal damping of eccentricity (Lithwick & Wu 2012; Batygin & Morbidelli 2013) have
been critically examined by Lee et al. (2013) who conclude that with reasonable estimates
of the tidal Love number, k, and dissipation factor, Q, tidal damping cannot account for the
majority of offsets from resonance. Recent work by Baruteau & Papaloizou (2013) finds that
interactions between a planet and the wake of a companion can reverse convergent migration
and significantly increase the period ratio away from the resonant value. They suggest that
this may help to account for the diversity of period ratios in Keplers multiple planet systems.
If a planetesimal disk contains a significant mass, interactions between the planets and
the disk may lead to significant damping of orbital eccentricities. The resonant structure of
the Kuiper Belt and the 'late veneer' found on Earth, Moon and Mars provide evidence for
a leftover planetesimal disk in our solar system that was still present at the end of planet
formation (Schlichting et al. 2012).
In some instances, interactions with a particle disk can be considered in analogy to those
with a gaseous disk. If the disk were composed of small bodies, collisions might maintain
the ratio of its thickness to radius at a much lower value than typical of a gaseous disk.
This could lower τe/τn and perhaps provide sufficient eccentricity damping to match the
-- 27 --
observed offsets from exact resonance. However, this proposal is plagued by uncertainty.
Gaps are easily opened in disks with small velocity dispersion and the absence of material
corotating with the planet would eliminate eccentricity damping associated with coorbital
Lindblad resonances. Coorbital Lindblad resonances dominate eccentricity damping during
type I migration.
By virtue of their slow detuning away from exact resonance, apsidal waves launched at
a secular resonance can propagate in low optical depth disks where waves associated with
other Lindblad resonances cannot (Goldreich & Tremaine 1978; Ward & Hahn 1998). That
an apsidal wave transports negative angular momentum follows from the fact that it excites
the eccentricities of disk particles while hardly affecting their energies. As a consequence, the
excitation of the apsidal wave damps the planet's orbital eccentricity. There is no difficulty
conjuring up reasonable scenarios in which the apsidal wave is responsible for damping a
planet's orbital eccentricity by a few orders of magnitude within the timescale that the par-
ticle disk might survive destruction or accretion onto planets and the central star. However,
just as for damping by dynamical friction, uncertainties abound. Foremost among them
are the mass and lifetime of the particle disk, the particle size distribution, and the radial
dependence of the apsidal precession rate. We leave these issues for a future investigation.
6. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
Our investigation is predicated on the assumption that the orbits of the Kepler planets
were largely determined by processes that operated within their protoplanetary disks and
that they have undergone little modification since it disappeared. That τe/τn, which depends
on temperature but is independent of disk surface density, plays a central role in the outcome
of evolution in resonance is consistent with, but far from a proof that this assumption is
valid. Given this starting point, we argue that the small fraction of Kepler pairs found close
to mean motion resonance is compatible with standard estimates for the rates of orbital
migration and eccentricity damping due to planet-disk interactions. Figure 4 shows that
capture into first-order mean motion resonance during convergent migration must have been
a common occurrence given the observed orbital parameters and estimated planet masses.
However, as the result of eccentricity damping, permanent capture in resonance was rare.
Most captures were only temporary with durations of order τe which is short in comparison
to the timescale τn for migration between neighboring resonances. The temporary nature of
resonance capture is due to the overstability of librations of the resonant argument about
the tidal equilibrium given by equation (24). The paucity of resonances among Kepler pairs
should therefore not be taken as evidence for in situ planet formation or the disruptive effects
-- 28 --
N
1000
800
600
400
200
0
2.00
2.01
2.02
2.03
P2P1
Fig. 12. -- Histogram of the period distribution for a planet pair permanently trapped in the
2:1 resonance and undergoing a large amplitude libration consistent with parameter values
µ1 = 0, µ2 = 4× 10−4, and τe1/τn2 = 0.022. Period ratios exceed the precise resonance value
of 2 by up to 1.5%. The intrinsic asymmetry about exact resonance is responsible for the
deficit of period ratios short of 2:1. However, as seen from Figure 10, only a few Kepler pairs
near the 2:1 resonance have µ2 as large as 4 × 10−4. Thus it appears that additional sources
of eccentricity damping must have occurred during or after the disk disappeared.
-- 29 --
of disk turbulence (Rein 2012).
The resonance model and our analytic solutions presented here only include the lowest
order term in eccentricity. The assumption of small eccentricities seems to be justified for the
majority of Kepler systems given that estimates for typical disk parameters yield equilibrium
eccentricities smaller than 0.1.
The overstability criterion described in §2.4.1 is the major technical accomplishment
of our paper. Permanent resonance capture is possible if tidal equilibrium occurs at large
enough separation from resonance so that a separatrix is not present. As indicated by Figures
10 and 11, only the most massive Kepler planets are likely to be permanently captured in
resonance. For the others, overstable librations lead to passage through resonance and to the
resumption of unimpeded convergent migration. In this context, the drop off in the number
of pairs with period ratios below 1.3 seen in Figure 1 presents a puzzle, but it may, at least
partly, be due to chaos caused by resonance overlap (Wisdom 1980; Deck et al. 2013).
HS gratefully acknowledges support from the Wade Fund. We thank Scott Tremaine,
Jing Luan and Glen Stewart for useful comments that helped to improve this manuscript.
A. Appendix
Equilibrium eccentricities and conditions for overstable librations were derived in the
body of our paper under the assumption that eccentricity is damped at constant angular
momentum such that p=3 in equation (2). Here we relax this assumption and provide ex-
pressions for the equilibrium eccentricity and conditions for overstable librations appropriate
for a general value of p > 0. Analogous expressions to the ones derived in section 2.4 are as
follows: Equation (24) for the equilibrium eccentricity generalizes to
Equation (29) for the growth rate of overstability is replaced by
eeq =(cid:18)
τe
(3j + p)τn(cid:19)1/2
.
s =
1
τe (cid:18) n
ωeq(cid:19)2 jpβµ′eeq −(cid:18)βµ′
eeq (cid:19)2! .
(A1)
(A2)
Thus overstable librations require p > 0. Equations (A1) and (A2) imply that a planet is
permanently trapped in resonance and its librations damped provided
µ′ >
jp
(3j + p)3/2β (cid:18) τe
τn(cid:19)3/2
.
(A3)
For
-- 30 --
< µ′ <
j 2p
8(3j + p)3/2β (cid:18) τe
τn(cid:19)3/2
jp
(3j + p)3/2β (cid:18) τe
τn(cid:19)3/2
,
(A4)
the planet is permanently caught in resonance and its libration amplitude saturates at a
finite value. Lastly, for
the planet is caught in resonance but then escapes on timescale τe.
µ′ <
j 2p
8(3j + p)3/2β (cid:18) τe
τn(cid:19)3/2
,
(A5)
REFERENCES
Artymowicz, P. 1993, ApJ, 419, 166
Baruteau, C., & Papaloizou, J. C. B. 2013, ArXiv e-prints. 1301.0779
Batalha, N. M., Rowe, J. F., Bryson, S. T., Barclay, T., Burke, C. J., Caldwell, D. A.,
Christiansen, J. L., Mullally, F., Thompson, S. E., Brown, T. M., Dupree, A. K.,
Fabrycky, D. C., Ford, E. B., Fortney, J. J., Gilliland, R. L., Isaacson, H., Latham,
D. W., Marcy, G. W., Quinn, S. N., Ragozzine, D., Shporer, A., Borucki, W. J.,
Ciardi, D. R., Gautier, T. N., III, Haas, M. R., Jenkins, J. M., Koch, D. G., Lissauer,
J. J., Rapin, W., Basri, G. S., Boss, A. P., Buchhave, L. A., Carter, J. A., Charbon-
neau, D., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Clarke, B. D., Cochran, W. D., Demory, B.-O.,
Desert, J.-M., Devore, E., Doyle, L. R., Esquerdo, G. A., Everett, M., Fressin, F.,
Geary, J. C., Girouard, F. R., Gould, A., Hall, J. R., Holman, M. J., Howard, A. W.,
Howell, S. B., Ibrahim, K. A., Kinemuchi, K., Kjeldsen, H., Klaus, T. C., Li, J.,
Lucas, P. W., Meibom, S., Morris, R. L., Prsa, A., Quintana, E., Sanderfer, D. T.,
Sasselov, D., Seader, S. E., Smith, J. C., Steffen, J. H., Still, M., Stumpe, M. C.,
Tarter, J. C., Tenenbaum, P., Torres, G., Twicken, J. D., Uddin, K., Van Cleve, J.,
Walkowicz, L., & Welsh, W. F. 2013, ApJS, 204, 24. 1202.5852
Batygin, K., & Morbidelli, A. 2013, AJ, 145, 1. 1204.2791
Borderies, N., & Goldreich, P. 1984, Celestial Mechanics, 32, 127
Deck, K. M., Payne, M., & Holman, M. J. 2013, ApJ, 774, 129. 1307.8119
Delisle, J.-B., Laskar, J., Correia, A. C. M., & Bou´e, G. 2012, A&A, 546, A71. 1207.3171
Fabrycky, D. C., Lissauer, J. J., Ragozzine, D., Rowe, J. F., Agol, E., Barclay, T., Batalha,
N., Borucki, W., Ciardi, D. R., Ford, E. B., Geary, J. C., Holman, M. J., Jenkins,
-- 31 --
J. M., Li, J., Morehead, R. C., Shporer, A., Smith, J. C., Steffen, J. H., & Still, M.
2012, ArXiv e-prints. 1202.6328
Friedland, L. 2001, ApJ, 547, L75
Goldreich, P. 1965, MNRAS, 130, 159
Goldreich, P., & Tremaine, S. 1980, ApJ, 241, 425
Goldreich, P., & Tremaine, S. D. 1978, Icarus, 34, 240
Henrard, J. 1982, Celestial Mechanics, 27, 3
Lee, M. H., Fabrycky, D., & Lin, D. N. C. 2013, ArXiv e-prints. 1307.4874
Lee, M. H., & Peale, S. J. 2002, ApJ, 567, 596
Lithwick, Y., & Wu, Y. 2012, ApJ, 756, L11. 1204.2555
Malhotra, R. 1993, Nature, 365, 819
Meyer, J., & Wisdom, J. 2008, Icarus, 193, 213
Murray, C. D., & Dermott, S. F. 1999, Solar system dynamics
Ogihara, M., & Kobayashi, H. 2013, ArXiv e-prints. 1307.7776
Petrovich, C., Malhotra, R., & Tremaine, S. 2013, ApJ, 770, 24. 1211.5603
Quillen, A. C. 2006, MNRAS, 365, 1367. arXiv:astro-ph/0507477
Rein, H. 2012, MNRAS, 427, L21. 1208.3583
Roy, A. E., & Ovenden, M. W. 1954, MNRAS, 114, 232
Schlichting, H. E., Warren, P. H., & Yin, Q.-Z. 2012, ApJ, 752, 8. 1202.6372
Tanaka, H., & Ward, W. R. 2004, ApJ, 602, 388
Ward, W. R. 1986, Icarus, 67, 164
-- 1988, Icarus, 73, 330
Ward, W. R., & Hahn, J. M. 1998, AJ, 116, 489
Wisdom, J. 1980, AJ, 85, 1122
-- 32 --
Yoder, C. F. 1979, Celestial Mechanics, 19, 3
This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2.
|
1305.1662 | 1 | 1305 | 2013-05-07T21:55:47 | Plutino Detection Biases, Including the Kozai Resonance | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | Because of their proximity within the transneptunian region, the plutinos (objects in the 3:2 mean-motion resonance with Neptune) are numerous in flux-limited catalogs, and well-studied theoretically. We perform detailed modelling of the on-sky detection biases for plutinos, with special attention to those that are simultaneously in the Kozai resonance. In addition to the normal 3:2 resonant argument libration, Kozai plutinos also show periodic oscillations in eccentricity and inclination, coupled to the argument of perihelion (omega) oscillation. Due to the mean-motion resonance, plutinos avoid coming to pericenter near Neptune's current position in the ecliptic plane. Because Kozai plutinos are restricted to certain values of omega, perihelion always occurs out of the ecliptic plane, biasing ecliptic surveys against finding these objects. The observed Kozai plutino fraction (fkoz) has been measured by several surveys, finding values between 8% and 25%, while the true fkoz has been predicted to be between 10% and 30% by different giant planet migration simulations. We show that the observed fkoz varies widely depending on the ecliptic latitude and longitude of the survey, so debiasing to find the true ratio is complex. Even a survey that covers most or all of the sky will detect an apparent Kozai fraction that is different from the true fkoz. We present a map of the on-sky plutino Kozai fraction that would be detected by all-sky flux-limited surveys. This will be especially important for the Panoramic Survey Telescope & Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS) and Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) projects, which may detect large numbers of plutinos as they sweep the sky. The Kozai fraction and the distribution of the orbital elements of Kozai plutinos may be a diagnostic of giant planet migration; future migration simulations should provide details on their resonant Kozai populations. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph |
Draft version October 18, 2018
Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 12/16/11
PLUTINO DETECTION BIASES, INCLUDING THE KOZAI RESONANCE
S. M. Lawler1, B. Gladman1
Draft version October 18, 2018
ABSTRACT
Because of their relative proximity within the transneptunian region, the plutinos (objects in the
3:2 mean-motion resonance with Neptune) are numerous in flux-limited catalogs, and well-studied
theoretically. We perform detailed modelling of the on-sky detection biases for plutinos, with special
attention to those that are simultaneously in the Kozai resonance.
In addition to the normal 3:2
resonant argument libration, Kozai plutinos also show periodic oscillations in eccentricity and incli-
nation, coupled to the argument of perihelion (ω) oscillation. Due to the mean-motion resonance,
plutinos avoid coming to pericenter near Neptune's current position in the ecliptic plane. Because
Kozai plutinos are restricted to certain values of ω, perihelion always occurs out of the ecliptic plane,
biasing ecliptic surveys against finding these objects. The observed Kozai plutino fraction f obs
koz has
been measured by several surveys, finding values between 8% and 25%, while the true Kozai plutino
fraction f true
koz has been predicted to be between 10% and 30% by different giant planet migration
simulations. We show that f obs
koz varies widely depending on the ecliptic latitude and longitude of the
survey, so debiasing to find the true ratio is complex. Even a survey that covers most or all of the sky
will detect an apparent Kozai fraction that is different from f true
koz . We present a map of the on-sky
plutino Kozai fraction that would be detected by all-sky flux-limited surveys. This will be especially
important for the Panoramic Survey Telescope & Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS) and Large
Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) projects, which may detect large numbers of plutinos as they sweep
the sky. f true
koz and the distribution of the orbital elements of Kozai plutinos may be a diagnostic of
giant planet migration; future migration simulations should provide details on their resonant Kozai
populations.
1. INTRODUCTION
Plutinos are trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs) that are
in the 3:2 mean-motion resonance with Neptune, mean-
ing that in the time it takes Neptune to complete three
orbits of the Sun, plutinos complete two orbits. Plutinos
are named after Pluto, which was the first known reso-
nant TNO, discovered to be so by examination of a nu-
merical orbital integration (Cohen and Hubbard 1964).
This same technique is currently used to confirm the
resonant nature of plutinos (and other resonant TNOs;
Gladman et al. 2008; Lykawka and Mukai 2007). Sev-
eral of the first TNOs that were discovered in the early
1990s were also found to be plutinos (Davies et al. 2008).
Plutinos are among the easier TNOs to observe; their
semimajor axis of approximately 39.5 AU places them
near the inner edge of the Kuiper Belt. Discovery is also
helped by the high eccentricities many plutinos possess,
causing close-in pericenters and lower apparent magni-
tudes, and thus brighter objects (this is an extremely
strong effect since the TNOs are observed with reflected
light, so their flux is proportional to distance−4). Pluti-
nos (and other resonant TNOs) can have lower perihelia
than non-resonant TNOs because the mean-motion reso-
nance protects them from close encounters with Neptune
(e.g. Malhotra 1996).
As of November 2012 there were 244 plutinos listed
in the Minor Planet Center (MPC) database. How-
ever, only about 120 of these have high-quality multi-
opposition orbits, allowing numerical orbital
integra-
1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, 6224 Agricultural
Road, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1
tions (Lykawka and Mukai 2007; Gladman et al. 2008)
to prove that the objects are truly resonant (showing
libration of the resonant angle; see Section 2), and not
just located near the resonance phase space.
This paper will highlight the special selection effects
caused by the Kozai resonance within the 3:2 resonance.
"Kozai plutinos" are TNOs that are simultaneously in
the 3:2 mean-motion resonance with Neptune and in the
Kozai resonance. Pluto was the first known Kozai res-
onator (Williams and Benson 1971).
What is now known as the Kozai resonance was first
described for high-inclination asteroids by Kozai (1962).
This effect occurs when a small body in orbit around a
large central mass is perturbed by a third mass at high
relative orbital inclination i.
In the case of the trans-
Neptunian region, the small bodies are the TNOs them-
selves, and the high relative inclination perturber is Nep-
tune, and to a smaller degree the other planets. Any
gravitational perturbations on the orbit of a small body
cause ω to change. Most of the time, this causes ω to pre-
cess, but under the special conditions that the perturber
is at high relative inclination, ω will oscillate instead:
this is the signature of the Kozai resonance. When 'near'
the resonance in phase space, the ω evolution becomes
highly non-uniform (sometimes called the Kozai effect
rather than resonance). In either case, one observes cou-
pled e and i oscillations correlated with the value of ω.
For non-resonant TNOs, Thomas and Morbidelli (1996)
show that the Kozai resonance only occurs at extremely
large eccentricity. However, inside mean-motion reso-
nances, the Kozai resonance can appear at moderate i
(e.g. Gallardo et al. 2012). This is how Pluto can show
2
Kozai oscillations despite being at the relatively low in-
clination of 17◦.
Lykawka and Mukai (2007) presented the largest col-
lection of plutinos that has been analyzed for Kozai res-
onance, after combing the contents of the Minor Planet
Center (MPC) database at the time. They found that 22
out of 100 plutinos were solidly in the Kozai resonance,
with ω oscillating around 90◦ or 270◦, and in one case
around 0◦. Unfortunately, the MPC database's collec-
tion of detections from many different non-uniform sur-
veys does not allow for easy debiasing. Because of this,
it is very difficult to measure the true fraction of Kozai
versus non-Kozai plutinos from this dataset.
This manuscript was motivated by the results of
the Canada-France Ecliptic Plane Survey (CFEPS;
Jones et al. 2006; Kavelaars et al. 2009; Petit et al. 2011;
Gladman et al. 2012), which detected and then re-
acquired nearly 200 TNOs, including 24 plutinos, to pro-
duce high-quality orbits and orbital classifications. This
survey was well calibrated: tracking efficiencies and mag-
nitude depths are precisely known for each pointing. Be-
cause of this, the survey could be debiased to produce
absolute populations. Two of the 24 detected Plutinos
in the survey were found to be in the Kozai resonance
upon examination of a 10 Myr orbital integration. Be-
cause 8% of the CFEPS-discovered plutinos were Kozai
plutinos, in order to properly debias CFEPS's result to
produce the absolute population and orbital element dis-
tribution of the plutinos, this Kozai component had to be
included and properly modelled (Gladman et al. 2012).
Though this paper only discusses plutinos in the Kozai
resonance, Lykawka and Mukai (2007) also catalogued
Kozai resonators in the 5:3, 7:4, and 2:1 mean-motion
resonances. Other resonances can also exhibit Kozai os-
cillations in some portion of the resonant phase space.
This paper provides a basic understanding of the Kozai
resonance within the 3:2, how the Kozai dynamics affect
plutino observations, and introduces possible uses for this
resonance in distinguishing between different giant planet
migration models. Section 2 discusses in-depth the dy-
namical requirements for a TNO to be in a mean-motion
resonance. Section 3 presents toy models of the 3:2 res-
onance (Sections 3.1 and 3.2), in order to demonstrate
the effect of libration, and finally gives a realistic plutino
distribution (Section 3.3). Section 4 discusses both the
dynamics of the Kozai plutinos and the on-sky detection
biases that result from the dynamical constraints placed
on the Kozai plutinos. Section 5 gives a summary of how
we simulate the plutino population. This simulation is
used in Section 6 to show biases that observers will en-
counter on different parts of the sky in detecting Kozai
and non-Kozai plutinos. Section 7 gives a discussion of
previous observations of Kozai plutinos and of theoretical
predictions in the literature. And finally, Section 8 dis-
cusses future observations that may help constrain the
Kozai fraction and the distribution of the orbital ele-
ments of Kozai plutinos.
2. RESONANT DYNAMICS
Fig. 1. -- Ω is the longitude of the ascending node, ω is the
argument of pericenter, and f is the true anomaly. The mean
anomaly M is the time since the last pericenter times the mean
motion: 2π/P. The mean longitude λ = Ω + ω + M, and the
longitude of pericenter = Ω + ω.
Resonances are diagnosed by inspecting the evolution
of an object's orbital elements during a numerical inte-
gration (Figure 2). The integration must be long enough
that the Myr-timescale Kozai oscillations are visible. If
the object inhabits the j:k mean-motion resonance with
Neptune, the primary resonant angle
φjk = jλ − kλN − (j − k)
will be confined and will not take on all values 0◦ to
360◦ over the course of the integration. λ is the mean
longitude of the object
(1)
(2)
λ = Ω + ω + M,
which gives the angle to the position of the object relative
to the reference direction. λN is the mean longitude of
Neptune, giving the angle to Neptune's position relative
to the reference direction. = Ω + ω is the longitude
of pericenter, which is the broken angle locating the ob-
ject's pericenter relative to the reference direction. The
amplitude of the φjk oscillation during the integration
gives the libration amplitude Ajk of the object.
All plutinos by definition inhabit the 3:2 mean-motion
resonance with Neptune, with a resonant argument
φ32 = 3λ − 2λN − .
(3)
A feature of the Kozai resonance (discussed in de-
tail in Section 4) is coupled oscillation in ω, eccentric-
ity e, and inclination i (see Figure 2).
e and i are
anti-correlated, and ω oscillates around 90 or 270◦ (or
temporarily around 0 or 180◦; Nesvorn´y and Roig 2000;
Lykawka and Mukai 2007). Figure 2 shows a 10 Myr or-
bital integration of the Kozai plutino 28978 Ixion, show-
ing the characteristic oscillations of e, i, and ω. For com-
parison, Figure 2 also shows a non-Kozai plutino and a
non-resonant TNO nearby in semimajor axis.
3. NON-KOZAI PLUTINOS
To orient the reader and make several
important
points, we first discuss toy models and then a realistic
libration amplitude distribution for the plutinos, ignor-
ing the Kozai component until Section 4.
Here we will discusses Plutino dynamics, and how res-
onant objects are identified in orbital integrations. Much
of this discussion can be generalized to other mean-
motion resonances. Figure 1 defines the usual heliocen-
tric ecliptic orbital elements.
3.1. 0◦ libration amplitude toy model
Due to the plutino resonance condition (Equation 3),
the location where the Plutinos can come to pericenter
is restricted. This is what allows resonant TNOs to re-
main stable on timescales of the age of the solar system,
3
Fig. 2. -- Barycentric orbital elements over the course of 10 Myr orbital integrations of the Kozai plutino 28978 Ixion (left), the CFEPS-
discovered non-Kozai plutino L4h15 (2004 HB79; center), and a non-resonant TNO (2004 PA112; right) for comparison. In both resonant
cases, the resonant argument φ32 librates around 180◦ (lower panels) because of the 3:2 mean-motion resonance with Neptune. The
Kozai plutino 28978 Ixion's integration also shows oscillations in ω around 270◦ with coupled, anti-correlated oscillations in e and i. The
integrations of the non-Kozai plutino and non-resonant TNO both show oscillations in e and i, but they are not coupled, and ω circulates.
Note that oscillations in semimajor axis and φ32 happen on much faster timescales (few thousand years) than the Kozai oscillations (few
million years), and that the oscillations in semimajor axis are much larger for the resonant TNOs than the non-resonant one.
despite having orbits that in some cases cross the or-
bit of Neptune. The resonant angle φ32 librates around
180◦ ± 360◦ × k, where k is an integer (using φ32 = 180◦
or -180◦ is sufficient to include plutinos at all angles from
Neptune). At pericenter, M = 0, and at that moment
equation 2 implies λ = Ω + ω = . For a plutino with
libration amplitude A32 = 0◦, φ32 = 180◦ always, and
180◦ = 3 − 2λN −
= λN + 90◦
(4)
So the plutino always comes to pericenter 90◦ away from
Neptune's position. This is shown in Figure 3. Because
φ32 = −180◦ is also valid, another perihelion occurs with
= λN − 90◦. The two points on the sky where a
A32 = 0◦ plutino comes to pericenter (in the ecliptic
plane, at λN ± 90◦), are very important in this paper,
so to avoid confusion we will refer to these as the "or-
thoneptune points".
3.2. 95◦ libration amplitude toy model
Real plutinos possess non-zero libration amplitudes;
A32 for known plutinos with well-characterized orbits
ranges between 20◦ and 130◦ (Lykawka and Mukai 2007;
Gladman et al. 2012). These libration amplitudes lead
to different selection effects: during each φ32 libration
period the perihelion direction oscillates around the or-
thoneptune points roughly sinusoidally in time with am-
plitude A32/2. Equation 3 shows that the maximum ex-
cursion from the orthoneptune points occurs when φ32
is at a maximum or minimum. This means that pluti-
nos spend more time near the extrema allowed by their
libration amplitudes, and are actually more likely to be
detected there. We demonstrate this using a population
of plutinos with A32 = 95◦ (see Figure 4 and caption).
To avoid confusion, all the plutinos in this toy model
have 0◦ inclination to the ecliptic, and all have the same
eccentricity. A32 = 95◦ is chosen because it was found
to be the most common plutino libration amplitude by
CFEPS (Gladman et al. 2012).
Fig. 3. -- The orbit of a 0◦ libration amplitude, 0◦ inclination,
e = 0.24 plutino in a frame that co-rotates with Neptune. The
motion in the co-rotating frame is clockwise, except at perihelion,
where this example's e is so high that it briefly moves counter-
clockwise. Pericenter occurs 90◦ ahead and behind Neptune's posi-
tion. Dotted circles are heliocentric distances of 30, 40, and 50 AU.
Neptune's position is shown for June 1, 2004 (which was midway
through the CFEPS survey); this is true for all subsequent plots.
3.3. A realistic plutino distribution
In actuality, plutinos possess a range of libration am-
plitudes. Figure 5 shows an observationally-motivated
distribution of plutinos, based on the debiased model
from CFEPS (Gladman et al. 2012, excluding the Kozai
component, which is discussed in detail in section 4).
Chiang and Jordan (2002) and Malhotra (1996) also pre-
sented models of the plutino distribution. Malhotra
(1996) discusses the dynamics of plutinos for given val-
ues of the libration amplitude, while Chiang and Jordan
(2002) examined distributions of particles where A32 was
established in a cosmogonic simulation. In contrast, our
distributions of a, e, i, and φ32 are determined by debi-
asing the CFEPS Survey.
While at first glance it appears that the 'turnaround'
4
6 h
3 h
6 h
3 h
9 h
50AU
40AU
30AU
9 h
50AU
40AU
30AU
12 h
0 h
Neptune
12 h
0 h
Neptune
15 h
21 h
15 h
21 h
18 h
18 h
s
n
o
i
t
c
e
t
e
D
.
l
e
R
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
6.5
6.0
5.5
4.5
5.0
RA [h]
4.0
3.5
3.0
Fig. 4. -- Top panel shows a population of plutinos with A32 =
95◦, i = 0◦, and e = 0.24 (see caption for Figure 3). The 95◦
libration amplitude means that the perihelion turnaround points
correspond to orbits with perihelia 42.5◦ and 137.5◦ ahead and
behind Neptune. The red box is shown at higher resolution in the
middle panel, where red circles show simulated detections from a
flux-limited all-sky survey. The lower panel shows that there are
more detections per degree of ecliptic at the 'turnaround' point,
which is where the libration causes the objects to come to peri-
center farthest from the orthoneptune points.
(The number of
detections per bin is arbitrary.)
effect shown in Figure 4 is completely lost, this is not the
case. Each plutino is still most likely to be detected at
its maximum perihelion excursion from the orthoneptune
points of A32/2. So, a plutino with an 80◦ libration am-
plitude is most likely to be detected 40◦ away from the
orthoneptune points, at λN ± 50◦ or λN ± 130◦, while a
plutino with a 20◦ libration amplitude is most likely to
be detected 10◦ away from the orthoneptune points, at
λN ± 80◦ or λN ± 100◦.
Because CFEPS showed that plutinos with A32 < 20◦
are so rare as to be approximated as absent, two peaks in
the detectability are visible, about 15◦ on either side of
the orthoneptune points. As Figure 5 shows, this means
]
[
c
e
d
60
40
20
0
20
40
60
0
5
10
15
RA [hours]
20
Fig. 5. -- Top panel shows a population of plutinos with a distri-
bution of orbital elements that matches the debiased plutino model
from CFEPS (Gladman et al. 2012, excluding the Kozai compo-
nent). See Figure 4 caption. The lower panel here shows the de-
tection density on the sky, with red being higher density and blue
being lower, with contours evenly spaced in detection density. Two
peaks are visible on either side of the orthoneptune points, which
are caused by the turnaround effect. At these peaks, the detection
density is ∼30% higher than at the orthoneptune points.
that the place on the sky to find the most plutinos is not
90◦ away from Neptune. For the CFEPS L7 model of
the true libration amplitude distribution (Gladman et al.
2012), the maximum on-sky detection rate (integrated
over all libration amplitudes) happens about ±15◦ away
from the orthoneptune points.
4. KOZAI PLUTINO DYNAMICS
This section discusses the dynamics of objects that are
simultaneously in the 3:2 mean-motion resonance with
Neptune (plutinos) and in the Kozai resonance, and the
effects these two simultaneous resonances have on the
on-sky detectability.
The Kozai resonance can occur at much lower in-
clinations within mean-motion resonances than for
non-resonant TNOs
1996;
Wan and Huang 2007). The ω oscillation is unique to
the Kozai resonance:
the perturbations of the other
solar system planets on a small body (resonant or not)
normally cause ω to precess rather than librate.
(Thomas and Morbidelli
The libration in e, i, and ω can be best understood
using a contour plot of the averaged Hamiltonian of the
disturbing function, which describes secular oscillation
due to the three-body interaction. Example surfaces for
the 4th order disturbing function for a Kozai plutino
(Wan and Huang 2007) are shown in Figure 6. These
are polar plots, where the length of the vector gives e,
and the angle from 0◦ gives ω. In the cases shown, only
the contours that close around 90◦ or 270◦ correspond to
Kozai oscillations. Each plutino that is also in the Kozai
resonance is confined to a particular contour on one of
these surfaces. Tracing one contour reveals how e and ω
vary during the course of a Kozai cycle, with the range
in ω values describing the Kozai libration amplitude Aω
around the relevant libration center. Orbital inclination
is calculated using e and conservation of the z-component
of angular momentum Lz ∝ cos i√1 − e2, because
cos ip1 − e2 = cos i0q1 − e2
0
(5)
for initial inclination i0 and initial eccentricity e0 at any
time. Each surface plot has its own Lz value, which is
parameterized using Imax:
cos i0q1 − e2
0 = cos Imax
Imax is the inclination required by conservation of angu-
lar momentum for e=0. Note that Imax is not the max-
imum inclination that these plutinos will reach; in or-
der for an object to have that inclination, it needs e=0,
which will not happen in the course of a high-e Kozai
oscillation. Plutinos always have maximum inclination
values attained during their Kozai oscillations that are
less than Imax. Imax is just a way to parameterize the
level surfaces.
For a known Kozai plutino, the level surface can be
chosen using the measured e0 and i0 values to calculate
Imax, which gives the Hamiltonian level surface for this
object. The measured ω0 value sets which contour the
object is oscillating on, and knowing the contour allows
the Kozai libration amplitude Aω to be calculated nu-
merically.
4.1. On-Sky Detection Biases for Kozai Plutinos
A direct consequence of the Kozai resonance-caused os-
cillation of ω is that these objects always come to pericen-
ter out of the ecliptic plane. Because these are plutinos,
we start with the same resonant condition (equation 3),
and for this illustration choose A32 = 0◦:
φ32 = 3λ − 2λN −
5
180◦ = 3(Ω + ω + M) − 2λN − (Ω + ω)
One can see from Figure 6 that when the Kozai libration
amplitude is 0◦, ω=90◦ or 270◦. At pericenter, M =
0◦. Substituting these values into the above equation
yields Ω = λN , indicating that the node of the plutino
orbit is in the same direction as Neptune, and ω will
be 90◦ ahead or behind that position (Ω = λN + 180◦
is also valid). The orbital plane of the plutino will be
tilted out of the ecliptic plane by the inclination, with
the line of nodes through Neptune's position acting as
the pivot. Most of the Kozai plutinos listed in the MPC
database have orbital inclinations between 10◦ and 30◦
(Lykawka and Mukai 2007), which means that when they
are at pericenter, a 0◦ Kozai libration amplitude plutino
will be roughly 10−30◦ above or below the ecliptic plane.
Solar System objects are most easily detected at peri-
center, when they are closest and thus brightest. Because
the Kozai plutinos are forced to be out of the ecliptic at
pericenter, they will be harder to detect in ecliptic sur-
veys than non-Kozai plutinos (see Figures 7 and 8). This
is an important bias that must be accounted for.
5. SIMULATING THE PLUTINOS
We simulate the population of plutinos by randomly
drawing from specified distributions of orbital elements
and magnitudes, then taking each simulated plutino and
"observing" it using the CFEPS survey simulator (pub-
licly available at www.cfeps.net). Figure 9 shows the
simulated Plutino distribution in semimajor axis, eccen-
tricity, and inclination. The non-Kozai plutino distri-
bution we use here is identical to the CFEPS L7 model,
while the Kozai plutino distribution here is more detailed
than that used by Gladman et al. (2012).
The following describes how our code builds a popu-
lation of plutinos with a realistic orbital element distri-
bution, one simulated object at a time. The first step is
to choose whether or not a given object is in the Kozai
resonance or not.
An important parameter in these simulations is the
true Kozai fraction f true
koz , which is the true number of
Kozai plutinos divided by the total number of plutinos.
This is not necessarily the same as the observed Kozai
fraction f obs
koz , which is the total number of detected Kozai
plutinos divided by the total number of detected plutinos
for a given survey. For most of our simulations, we use a
true Kozai fraction f true
koz = 10%, based on the results of
CFEPS. However, because Gladman et al. (2012) found
that Kozai fractions up to 33% cannot be ruled out at
the 99% confidence level, some of our calculations are re-
peated for f true
koz values of 20% and 30%. Constraining the
value of f true
koz will require many more well-characterized
plutino detections than are currently available.
5.1. Non-Kozai Plutinos
For the plutinos which are not also in Kozai (with
percentage 100%-f true
koz ), the following procedure is fol-
lowed to choose its orbital elements. This is the same
as the best-fit non-Kozai plutino model from CFEPS
(Gladman et al. 2012).
First, the eccentricity is chosen from a Gaussian prob-
ability distribution centered on 0.18 with a width of
0.06. Eccentricities large enough to approach the orbit of
Uranus (e > 0.22) are not allowed. The semi-major axis
6
)
(
n
i
s
e
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
1997 QJ4
0.3
0.2
2002 VR128
0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3
e cos()
)
(
n
i
s
e
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.0
0.2
e cos()
0.2
0.4
Fig. 6. -- 3 different Hamiltonian level surfaces for plutinos (constructed using the disturbing function from Wan and Huang 2007), for
different values of angular momentum. Left panel is Imax = 14◦, center is Imax = 21◦, and right is Imax = 34◦. These are polar plots, with
e as the radius and ω as the angle. Also shown on the center plot are the 10 Myr orbital integrations of the Kozai plutinos 1997 QJ4 and
2002 VR128, showing circulation around the ω = 90◦ or 270◦ islands over time; these plutinos were chosen because they have Imax ≃ 21◦.
While the presence of other planets causes small changes in the Hamiltonian, one can see that the evolution is decently approximated.
6 h
3 h
9 h
30AU
50AU
40AU
12 h
0 h
Neptune
15 h
21 h
18 h
Fig. 7. -- Top panel shows a toy model of the Kozai plutinos,
where all objects have A32 = 95◦, using one contour from one
level surface (meaning that all these Kozai plutinos have the same
Kozai libration amplitude Aω). Objects in the red box are shown
at higher resolution in bottom panel. Red circles show simulated
detections from a flux-limited ecliptic survey. The objects are only
detected where they cross through the ecliptic plane, which is never
when the objects are at pericenter.
is chosen from a simplified version of the stability tests
of Tiscareno and Malhotra (2009). a is chosen within
0.2 AU of 39.45 AU for objects with e > 0.15. The al-
lowed range of a values drops linearly as e gets smaller,
reaching a width of zero at e = 0 (see Figure 9). The
inclination is then chosen from a probability distribution
of the form
P (i) ∝ sin i exp(cid:18) −i2
32(cid:19)
2σ2
with σ32 = 16◦ (originally based on the inclination distri-
bution postulated by Brown 2001). The libration ampli-
tude is chosen from an asymmetric "tent-shaped" prob-
ability distribution with a peak at 95◦, and linearly de-
creasing probabilities to the lower and upper bounds,
20◦ and 130◦ respectively, where the probability drops
to zero.
Lastly, the object's absolute magnitude Hg is chosen
from an exponential distribution: N (< Hg) ∝ 10αHg ,
with α=0.9. The reader is cautioned that this α value
can only be considered valid in the range of Hg mag-
nitudes where CFEPS had many detections (approxi-
mately 8 < Hg < 9 for the plutinos). Sensitivity to
the size distribution is discussed further in Section 6.3.
5.2. Kozai Plutinos
For a Kozai plutino, a slightly different path is followed
to choose its orbital elements.
First, the Hamiltonian level surface is chosen. Inspect-
ing the results of Lykawka and Mukai (2007), we found
which Hamiltonian level surface corresponded to each
of their Kozai plutinos. To reflect this distribution of
surfaces, we used level surfaces corresponding to Imax
of 14◦, 16◦, 17.5◦, 20◦, 21◦, 21.3◦, 21.6◦, 22.5◦, 24◦,
26◦, 28◦, and 34◦, in equal proportions. In reality, due
to the historical dominance of ecliptic surveys and the
bias against detecting large i TNOs, there are proba-
bly a larger fraction of large i Kozai librators; however,
the currently available information does not justify more
complex modeling.
Once the Imax level surface is chosen, we pick a Kozai
libration amplitude Aω at random between 10◦-80◦. ω
is then chosen sinusoidially within the values allowed by
7
Aω. Because of the banana-shape of the contours, there
are two values of e allowed for any given value of ω (see
Figure 6). Given this value of ω, the Wan and Huang
(2007) disturbing function allows numerical determina-
tion of the two e values that correspond to ω on the
contour. Half of the time we choose the lower value of
e, and half higher. The inclination i is calculated using
cos i√1 − e2 = cos Imax. Since this only covers the 90◦
Kozai libration island, half of the objects are flipped ω
of to 360◦ minus the original ω value.
Lastly, the semi-major axis, the libration amplitude
A32, and the absolute H magnitude are all chosen follow-
ing the same procedure as for the non-Kozai plutinos.
6. ON-SKY BIASES
We build up a population of synthetic plutinos, draw-
ing orbital elements and magnitudes from the specified
distributions as described above, and determine if each
object is detected by a survey using the survey simu-
lator code. Using the specified field coverage, magni-
tude efficiency, and tracking fraction, the code deter-
mines whether or not each object will be detected by
the survey. Comparing the distributions of the drawn
and simulator-detected objects gives an idea of the bi-
ases that are present in surveys that cover different areas
of the sky to different magnitude depths. When the sim-
ulated detections are compared to the true detections in
a real, well-characterized survey, this is a powerful tool to
help in debiasing to regain the real intrinsic population's
orbital distribution.
Figure 10 shows an on-sky detection density map for all
the plutinos, including the Kozai component. With the
Kozai component included, it is still true that most pluti-
nos are detected in broad clumps around the orthonep-
tune points, 90◦ away from Neptune. The reader will
notice that the highest detection densities still occur in
clumps in the ecliptic on either side of the orthoneptune
points rather than exactly centered on the orthoneptune
points. This is caused by the "turnaround" detection
effect described in Section 3.3.
The Kozai plutinos are only visible (for this realistic
model) as subtle density enhancements about 10◦ off the
ecliptic, making the density contours in Figure 10 ap-
pear slightly more rectangular than in Figure 5. This
rectangular shape is enhanced for higher values of f true
koz .
Note that there is no "spike" in detections at the ecliptic
latitudes where the density of Kozai plutinos is highest;
the detection densities are still dominated by the much
greater numbers of non-Kozai plutinos.
To clarify what is happening for the Kozai population,
the Kozai component is shown separately in Figure 11.
The Kozai plutino detections are more confined in eclip-
tic latitude than the non-Kozai plutinos, with the highest
detection densities happening about 10◦ above and below
the ecliptic, in broad swaths surrounding the orthonep-
tune points, with the central minimum again caused by
the lack of A32 < 20◦ plutinos.
6.1. Ecliptic Latitude Distribution of Detections
Figure 12 presents the ecliptic latitudes of detected
Plutinos in a simulated all-sky survey. The number of
detections for all plutinos smoothly falls from 0◦ ecliptic
latitude on up to higher latitudes. Although the number
of Kozai detections climbs as one rises to ∼15◦ ecliptic
45
40
]
U
A
[
n
o
i
t
c
e
t
e
D
t
a
e
c
n
a
t
s
i
D
35
30
25
0
5
Kozai
non-Kozai
45
35
40
15
10
Ecliptic Latitude ( )
30
20
25
Fig. 8. -- Detected plutinos in a simulated, flux-limited, all-sky
survey, using realistic distributions for both populations.
In the
two upper panels, the color of each point shows the distance at
which the plutino was detected (see legend in panels), with Kozai
plutinos in the uppermost panel and non-Kozai plutinos in the
middle panel. The non-Kozai plutinos are detected at a broad dis-
tance range in each of the two pericenter lobes. The distance at
which the Kozai plutinos are detected is very much dependent on
ecliptic latitude, with higher ecliptic latitudes detected at closer
distances, and lower detected at greater distances. The large green
dot marks Neptune's location. The lower panel shows the distance
and ecliptic latitude where each plutino was detected, using one of
the pericenter lobes (plutinos between ecliptic longitudes of 12h-
18h). Blue shows Kozai plutinos, red shows non-Kozai. The solid
lines show the average in 0.5◦ bins of ecliptic latitude. The average
detection distace for Kozai plutinos depends on ecliptic latitude,
with those at low latitudes being at the farthest average heliocen-
tric distance. Non-Kozai plutinos show no such trend.
8
e
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
39.3
e
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0
39.6
Kozai
non-Kozai
10
20
30
40
i [ ]
50
60
70
]
[
i
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
39.3
39.4
39.5
a [AU]
39.4
39.5
39.6
a [AU]
Fig. 9. -- Distribution of simulated plutinos in semimajor axis, eccentricity, and inclination. Red points are non-Kozai plutinos and blue
points are plutinos in the Kozai resonance. The Kozai plutinos are constrained by the conservation of Lz and our choice of Imax values.
This is especially obvious in the middle panel, where each Kozai curve corresponds to a particular Imax value; over a Kozai libration cycle,
objects never reach e = 0, and thus always have i < Imax.
]
[
c
e
d
60
40
20
0
20
40
60
60
40
20
0
20
40
60
60
40
20
0
20
40
60
0
koz =10%
f true
koz =20%
f true
koz =30%
f true
5
10
15
RA [hours]
20
Fig. 10. -- Relative density of detections on the sky in an all-sky
survey using our plutino model, including both Kozai and non-
Kozai components, for three different values of f true
koz . Contours
are evenly spaced in detection density, and contour values are the
same in all three plots (absolute detection densities are arbitrary).
The position of Neptune is shown by a green circle. The detec-
tion density becomes somewhat less concentrated to the ecliptic
for increasing Kozai fraction.
latitude, they never hold more than about half the de-
tections in a bin.
Schwamb et al. (2010) and Brown (2008) found a fac-
tor of ∼4 spike in the number of detections in their sur-
veys in the 11-13◦ ecliptic latitude bin, which they at-
tribute to potentially being caused by Kozai plutinos.
However, our simulation makes this explanation implau-
sible. Even when we go to the extreme and unrealistic
]
["
c
e
d
60
40
20
0
20
!
40
60
0
5
10
15
RA [hours]
20
Fig. 11. -- Relative density of detections on the sky using an all-
sky survey only using the Kozai component of our model. Contours
are evenly spaced in detection density. The position of Neptune is
shown by a green circle.
case of only using the lowest Imax value of 14◦ (which
makes the Kozai plutinos as compact as possible in eclip-
tic latitude), and using the highest value of f true
koz = 30%,
we still find that there is only a ∼20% increase in the
number of plutinos at ecliptic latitudes of 11-13◦. Kozai
plutinos do not explain this spike in detections, because it
is impossible to confine the detections of Kozai librators
to a narrow ecliptic latitude bin. The reported detection
spike is likely a small-number statistics fluctuation.
6.2. fkoz On-Sky
Figure 13 shows the ratio between the number of Kozai
plutino detections to the total number of plutino detec-
tions in small bins on the sky, providing a local f obs
koz map.
(This is essentially the ratio of Figure 11 to Figure 10).
Figure 13 shows the range of f obs
koz values that could be
locally found at different positions on the sky, for f true
koz
of 10%, 20%, and 30%.
f obs
koz values vary from 0% to nearly twice the f true
koz val-
ues. The highest f obs
koz values occur where the Kozai de-
tection density is highest: above and below the ecliptic
plane by about 12◦
6.3. Size Distribution Effects
The diameter distribution of TNOs is fit by a power
law, usually parameterized as N (> d) ∝ d−Q, where
N (> d) is the number of objects larger than a diame-
ter d, and Q is the index of the power law. However,
s
n
o
i
t
c
e
t
e
d
f
o
n
o
i
t
c
a
r
f
e
v
i
t
a
e
r
1.0
0.75
0.5
0.25
1.0
0.75
0.5
0.25
1.0
0.75
0.5
0.25
0
l
10
koz =10%
f true
koz =20%
f true
koz =30%
f true
non-Kozai
Kozai
40
50
20
30
Ecliptic latitude [ # ]
Fig. 12. -- Stacked histograms of the ecliptic latitude distri-
bution of detected Plutinos for different values of f true
koz , using a
magnitude-limited all-sky survey. The number of detections per
bin is normalized to the maximum bin. Kozai plutinos are shown
in red, non-Kozai plutinos in blue.
]
[*
c
e
d
60
40
20
0
20
40
60
60
40
20
0
20
40
60
60
40
20
0
20
40
60
0
&
%
$
)
(
'
-
,
+
koz =10%
f true
koz =20%
f true
koz =30%
f true
5
10
15
RA [hours]
20
Fig. 13. -- This shows f obs
koz , the number of Kozai plutino detec-
tions divided by the total number of plutino detections in 2◦ × 6◦
bins on the sky, using our best plutino model. The true Kozai
fraction (for the entire plutino population) f true
koz , is 10% in the top
panel, 20% in the center, and 30% in the lower panel. The local
f obs
koz varies widely, from nearly zero around Neptune to its highest
values about 10◦ off the ecliptic.
9
1=0.6
6=0.9
:=1.2
5
10
15
RA [hours]
20
]
[5
c
e
d
60
40
20
0
20
40
60
60
40
20
0
20
40
60
60
40
20
0
20
40
60
0
0
/
.
4
3
2
9
8
7
Fig. 14. -- Relative density of plutino detections (including Kozai,
with f true
koz = 10%) using three different values of α, the logarith-
mic slope of the size distribution in absolute magnitude. Contours
are evenly spaced in detection density, and the contours represent
the same values in each panel. For steeper power laws, the den-
sity of detection also becomes steeper, with more detections at the
turnaround points, and fewer detections 90◦ away.
the KBOs
ferent depending on the size of
(e.g.
Fuentes and Holman 2008; Fraser and Kavelaars 2009).
For most of our calculations, we use the nominal CFEPS
value for plutinos of α = 0.9 (Gladman et al. 2012). But
for comparison, Figure 14 shows the effect of different
values of α on the detection density, and Figure 15 shows
the effect of different α values on f obs
koz at different places
on the sky. Steeper slopes result in steeper detection
density distributions, where the peak detection densities
are much higher. This is because the relative importance
of detecting the large number of small plutinos that are
only visible at perihelion increases. Lower values of α
result in shallower density distributions. This effect is
noticeable, but the overall pattern of where on the sky
the highest f obs
koz values are remains the same.
because only a few of the largest KBOs have had their
diameters directly measured by occultation or resolved
imaging, what is actually measured is the magnitude. To
convert this to a diameter, an albedo must be measured
or assumed. For this reason we discuss the size distribu-
tion in terms of absolute magnitude: N (< H) ∝ 10αH.
The values Q and α are related: α = Q
5 .
logarithmic slope α is known to be dif-
The
6.4. Example Simulated Surveys
We perform a number of strawman simulated surveys
to demonstrate the different values of apparent average
f obs
koz that result from different survey parameters and dif-
ferent f true
koz values. These are summarized in Table 1. For
all of these simulated surveys, we ignore the extra confu-
sion caused by the plane of the Milky Way, and assume
that the entire area within each survey is observed uni-
10
]
[B
c
e
d
60
40
20
0
20
40
60
60
40
20
0
20
40
60
60
40
20
0
20
40
60
0
A
@
?
=
<
;
F
E
D
=0.6
>
=0.9
C
=1.2
G
5
10
15
RA [hours]
20
Fig. 15. -- f obs
koz at different points on the sky, using f true
koz = 10%,
and three different slopes for the power-law absolute magnitude
distribution. Steeper slopes cause the f obs
koz value to vary more
widely, reaching maximum values of almost 30%, while the shallow
slopes give the highest f obs
koz values of only about 20%.
formly and with perfect tracking efficiency (that is, all
discoveries are tracked to yield high quality orbits).
Each simulated survey goes to a magnitude depth of
g = 24.9. Varying the magnitude depth did not have any
noticeable effect on the detection density or fkoz values
on the sky, due to the assumed exponential nature of the
distribution.
First we perform an all-sky survey with a set limit-
ing magnitude (Survey 1), which finds a higher Kozai
koz being higher than f true
fraction than reality, with f obs
koz .
Survey 2, an ecliptic survey covering the entire eclip-
tic within ±2.5◦, unsurprisingly finds the opposite effect,
with f obs
koz . This is due to the Kozai
plutinos preferentially being detected out of the ecliptic
plane, as discussed in Section 4.1.
koz being lower than f true
Surveys 3 and 4 are 20◦×20◦ surveys centered on the
ecliptic. Survey 3 is centered 90◦ away from Neptune,
and Survey 4 is centered 75◦ away from Neptune, near
the plutinos' peak in detectability. Surveys 5 and 6 are
smaller, 2◦×2◦ surveys, centered on the ecliptic 90◦ and
75◦ away from Neptune, respectively. These four surveys
all find lower f obs
koz , for the same reason as
Survey 2.
koz than f true
Surveys 7 and 8 are the same as Surveys 3 and 4, except
centered 10◦ above the ecliptic. Similarly, Surveys 9 and
10 are the same as Surveys 5 and 6, raised to 10◦ above
the ecliptic. Because these surveys cover the range of
the Kozai plutinos' peak detection density, they all find
higher f obs
koz than f true
koz values.
There is not a significant difference between the f obs
koz
values measured by the surveys that are centered on 90◦
from Neptune and those centered on 75◦ from Neptune.
There is a difference in the relative number of detections,
with overall more plutinos detected at 75◦ from Neptune.
However, because both the Kozai and non-Kozai plutinos
have the same A32 distribution in this model, the Kozai
fraction does not vary significantly between these two
positions on the sky.
These surveys demonstrate that very different values of
f obs
koz can be measured depending on the on-sky location
of the survey. Due to the different biases inherent in the
distribution of Kozai plutinos versus non-Kozai plutinos,
careful debiasing is required to calculate f true
from any
koz
survey, even one which covers the entire sky.
7. COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS LITERATURE
In the previous sections, we have discussed two quan-
tities that can be measured for a survey or simulation
that contains many well-characterized plutinos: fkoz and
the distribution of Imax for the Kozai plutinos. Be-
low, we discuss these quantities as measured by obser-
vational surveys and giant planet migration simulations.
Only a few surveys are discussed here, as only a few
previously published TNO surveys have rigorous enough
tracking and characterization methods to classify pluti-
nos as Kozai or non-Kozai in orbital integrations.
7.1. The Kozai Fraction fkoz
The simplest quantity to measure in a survey or simula-
tion that contains plutinos is fkoz, the fraction of plutinos
that are in Kozai. However, one must be careful to note
whether this is the true or apparent fkoz. Most surveys
will have some bias, as shown in Table 1, causing f obs
koz to
be different than f true
koz .
Below we discuss the fkoz results presented in sev-
eral observational surveys and theoretical simulations. A
summary is presented in Table 2.
7.1.1. Observational Surveys: f obs
koz
CFEPS (Petit et al. 2011), being a well-calibrated sur-
vey, was able to provide both an apparent and a true
fkoz, albeit with large uncertainty (Gladman et al. 2012).
They find f obs
koz of 2/24 = 8%. After debiasing, this would
require a value of f true
koz of 10%. However, because CFEPS
was confined to the ecliptic plane, it was not very sen-
sitive to the high-inclination Kozai plutino population,
and f true
koz up to 33% cannot be ruled out with 99% con-
fidence due to the small number statistics of having only
two detected Kozai plutinos.
The Deep Ecliptic Survey (Elliot et al. 2005), while
finding a reported 51 plutinos, did not specifically la-
bel any of their discovered plutinos as Kozai, and thus is
not discussed further (although some of their discoveries
are in the biased Lykawka and Mukai (2007) compila-
tion, discussed below).
A few papers have tried to use the entire MPC
database as a survey. While this does provide many
plutinos, the MPC contains the results of many surveys
and even serendipitous discoveries, each with completely
different and possibly unknown biases, since one doesn't
know where searches failed to detect plutinos. Debiasing
koz to find f true
f obs
koz
Gomes (2000) and Nesvorn´y et al. (2000) performed
similar large MPC database searches capable of classi-
fying objects as Kozai or non-Kozai plutinos. Gomes
is impossible for these surveys.
11
TABLE 1
Simulations of fkoz
Survey Description
koz = 10% f true
f true
f obs
koz values for:
koz = 20% f true
koz = 30%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
all sky
5◦ high, on ecliptic
20◦×20◦ box, 90◦ from Neptune, on ecliptic
20◦×20◦ box, 75◦ from Neptune, on ecliptic
2◦×2◦ box, 90◦ from Neptune, on ecliptic
2◦×2◦ box, 75◦ from Neptune, on ecliptic
20◦×20◦ box, 90◦ from Neptune, 10◦ off ecliptic
20◦×20◦ box, 75◦ from Neptune, 10◦ off ecliptic
2◦×2◦ box, 90◦ from Neptune, 10◦ off ecliptic
2◦×2◦ box, 75◦ from Neptune, 10◦ off ecliptic
12 %
7.5 %
9.5 %
10 %
7.6 %
7.4 %
13 %
13 %
14 %
14 %
23 %
15 %
19 %
18 %
16 %
16 %
25 %
24 %
26 %
27 %
35 %
23 %
29 %
28 %
24 %
23 %
37 %
36 %
37 %
38 %
Measurements of fkoz from the Literature
TABLE 2
Source
type
Observational
Gomes (2000)
Nesvorn´y et al. (2000)
Observational
Chiang and Jordan (2002)
Theoretical
Hahn and Malhotra (2005) Theoretical
Lykawka and Mukai (2007) Observational
Levison et al. (2008)
Schwamb et al. (2010)
Gladman et al. (2012)
Theoretical
Observational
Observational
f true
koz
-
-
20-30%
19%
-
16%
-
10%
f obs
koz
26%
12%
-
-
22-30%
-
33%
8%
# plutinos
23
33
42
133
100
186
6
24
(2000) examined the first 23 discovered Plutinos with
observations for 2 or more oppositions. Though many of
these classifications were provisional due to a lack of pre-
cise data, he found f obs
koz of 6/23 = 26%. Nesvorn´y et al.
(2000) performed a similar analysis for the first 33 pluti-
nos, finding that only 4 of them were in Kozai, giving
f obs
koz of 12%, despite an overlapping sample.
Currently, the largest collection of well-classified pluti-
nos was presented in Lykawka and Mukai (2007), with
100 plutinos from the MPC database. All of these pluti-
nos had at least 2 opposition observations, and 10 Myr
orbital integrations were performed. They found that 22
plutinos are solidly in the Kozai resonance, with 8 more
that are in the Kozai resonance for part of their inte-
gration. Thus, from their integrations they find f obs
koz of
22-30%.
Schwamb et al. (2010) completed a wide-field survey
covering a large fraction of the sky (∼ 12, 000 square
degrees) within 30◦ of the ecliptic. This relatively shal-
low survey (R ∼ 21.5) found 6 plutinos, two of which
are in Kozai, giving f obs
koz = 33%, albeit with large Pois-
son uncertainty. The higher ecliptic latitudes included
in this survey would make detecting the Kozai plutinos
more likely, thus this higher apparent f obs
koz value is not
surprising. Although this is the first large area survey
which found and tracked plutinos and Kozai plutinos, a
much larger number of plutino detections will be needed
to accurately measure the Kozai fraction.
7.1.2. Theoretical Simulations: f true
koz
Of the published simulations of giant planet migra-
tion, only Chiang and Jordan (2002) includes informa-
tion on which plutino test particles ended up in Kozai.
Future simulations should include this information, as
it may prove a useful diagnostic. We also discuss
the Kozai plutinos from Hahn and Malhotra (2005) and
Levison et al. (2008), because the authors provided us
with the output orbits of these simulations and were able
to complete the required analysis ourselves.
Chiang and Jordan (2002) studied a smooth outward
migration of Neptune, with different migration times for
Neptune to reach its current location. They discuss ob-
jects that are captured into the Kozai resonance within
the 3:2 for their simulation where Neptune migrates with
a damping half-life of 107 years. Because of the shorter
timescale of their simulations, their resonance classifica-
tion isn't as secure as in the other simulations discussed
below. Out of 92 plutinos at the end of their simulation,
they estimate that 42 will remain in the 3:2 resonance for
the age of the solar system. Of these, 8-12 are in Kozai,
giving f true
koz of 20-30%. They unfortunately do not dis-
cuss the effect that different migration timescales have
on the Kozai fraction, nor how f true
koz might evolve over
4 Gyr.
Hahn and Malhotra (2005) and Levison et al. (2008)
provided enough data from the end of their theoretical
migration simulations that we were able to continue the
integrations for 10 Myr, long enough to diagnose if a
plutino is in Kozai or not. Hahn and Malhotra (2005)
used a smooth outward migration of Neptune, while
Levison et al. (2008) had Neptune on a large-eccentricity
orbit that damps after interacting with the Kuiper Belt
(motivated by the "Nice Model" scenario; Tsiganis et al.
2005).
For the Levison et al. (2008) simulation, we were given
the 10 Myr orbital integrations originally used to classify
objects as resonant or non-resonant at the end of their
1 Gyr migration simulation (Run B). These integrations
12
]
[J
e
c
a
f
r
u
s
n
a
n
o
t
l
i
i
m
a
H
f
o
x
a
m
i
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
20
40
60
80
Kozai libration amplitude A
120
100
[ I ]
H
Fig. 16. -- Scatterplot showing the Imax values (which param-
eterize which Hamiltonian level surface the plutino is on), and
the Kozai libration amplitudes Aω (which parameterizes which
contour of the level surface the plutino is on).
Purple cir-
cles show simulated Kozai plutinos from Levison et al. (2008)
(LMVGT2008), green squares show real Kozai plutinos from the
MPC database (L&M2007, Lykawka and Mukai 2007), and red tri-
angles show simulated Kozai plutinos from Hahn and Malhotra
(2005) (H&M2005). Error bars for the MPC values are those re-
ported by Lykawka and Mukai (2007), other error bars are esti-
mated by eye from orbital integrations.
contain the osculating orbital elements at each timestep,
and these were searched for oscillation of ω around 90◦
or 270◦ to determine Aω.
For the Hahn and Malhotra (2005) data, we were pro-
vided the osculating orbital elements of all test particles
and the 4 giant planets at the end of their 4.5 Gyr giant
planet migration simulation. However, these were di-
vided into 100 separate simulations, each with different
giant planet positions and different numbers of remaining
test particles (most had ∼50). Each of these were input
into a slightly modified version of the orbital integrator
SWIFT (Levison and Duncan 1994), and 30 Myr orbital
integrations were performed. We analysed the remaining
test particles for libration of φ32, and then for oscillation
of ω around 90◦ or 270◦.
Out of 133 plutinos in the Hahn and Malhotra (2005)
simulation, 25 were in Kozai, giving f true
koz = 19%. The
Levison et al. (2008) simulation provided 186 plutinos,
of which 29 were in Kozai, giving f true
koz = 16%.
These fkoz values all contain large uncertainties, and
in our opinion, all roughly agree with each other at this
point. As more plutinos are found by rapidly repeating
all-sky surveys such as LSST, the value of f true
should
koz
become precisely measurable as the survey characteriza-
tion becomes well-determined.
7.2. Distribution of Kozai Parameters
The two main parameters we use to describe the Kozai
behavior of a given Kozai plutino are Imax and the Kozai
libration amplitude Aω. The distribution of Imax tells
about the range of e and i that are possible during a
Kozai cycle. Imax is a parameterization of which Hamil-
tonian level surface currently best describes the Kozai
libration of that plutino. The Kozai libration amplitude
Aω measures which contour within the Imax level surface
the plutino is on, and is found from looking at the results
of a 10-30 Myr diagnostic orbital integration.
Because this is a distribution and not just a sin-
1.0
n
o
i
t
c
a
r
f
e
v
i
t
a
u
m
u
c
l
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
LMVGT2008
L&M2007
H&M2005
sim.
survey 1
survey 2
survey 3
15
30
imax of Hamiltonian [ K ]
20
25
35
0.0
10
1.0
n
o
i
t
c
a
r
f
e
v
i
t
a
u
m
u
c
l
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
10
30
20
70
Kozai libration amplitude A
40
50
60
L
90
80
[ M ]
Fig. 17. -- Cumulative distributions of Imax and Aω vales. See
Figure 16 caption for symbols. The intrinsic distribution of thou-
sands of simulated Kozai plutinos using our model is shown by a
dotted black line. The results of running this distribution through a
survey simulator using parameters for Surveys 1, an all-sky survey,
Survey 2, an ecliptic survey, and Survey 3, a 20◦×20◦ survey cen-
tered 90◦ from Neptune (see Section 6.4) are shown by solid lines.
The models produce generically lower inclination objects, but seem
to produce similar Kozai libration amplitudes to the MPC objects
(keep in mind that the MPC objects are not debiased). Note that
the intrinsic model matches the MPC sample quite well because,
as explained in Section 5.2, the distribution of Kozai Imax values
was based on the objects in the MPC.
gle value like fkoz,
it is only instructive to analyse
for the surveys and simulations with the largest num-
ber of plutinos. We compare the Imax distributions
found in the theoretical giant planet migration simula-
tions of Hahn and Malhotra (2005) and Levison et al.
(2008) with the MPC database analysis presented in
Lykawka and Mukai (2007), and with our own simula-
tion (Figures 16 and 17).
When looking at Figures 16 and 17, it is imporant
to keep in mind that we are comparing different kinds
of distributions. The simulated Kozai plutinos from
Levison et al. (2008), Hahn and Malhotra (2005), and
this paper are intrinsic distributions, that is, not ob-
served by a biased survey. The MPC-detected Kozai
plutinos (from Lykawka and Mukai 2007) and the distri-
butions resulting from the simulated surveys presented
in this paper are biased. In the case of the MPC sam-
ple, which contains the results of many uncharacterized
surveys, precise debiasing is impossible. The simulated
surveys, however, are all based on our simulated plutino
distribution, so we can see the effects of different types
of surveys on the detected parameters. The all-sky sur-
vey (Survey 1) is slightly biased toward finding a higher
proportion of higher Imax objects than reality, while Sur-
veys 2 and 3 are weakly biased toward finding a higher
proportion of lower Imax objects than reality. All three
simulated surveys show little bias in the distribution of
Kozai libration amplitudes.
The distribution of Kozai libration amplitudes is shown
in the bottom panel of Figure 17. There is general
agreement between libration amplitude distribution of
the MPC Kozai plutinos and both giant planet mi-
gration simulations, however, the Hahn and Malhotra
(2005) simulation finds generally lower libration ampli-
tudes, while the Levison et al. (2008) simulation finds
generally higher. This is an area that could use more
theoretical work, as different migration timescales and
migration modes may cause different libration amplitude
distributions.
It is obvious from the top panel of Figure 17 that the
Imax values are much lower in both of the simulations
than in the MPC. Although the MPC distribution is not
debiased, and thus may not reflect the true distribution
of Kozai plutinos, the inclination distribution discrep-
ancy between models and the true Kuiper Belt has been
noticed before (Gladman et al. 2012). This is a generic
problem with giant planet migration simulations, and not
unique to this Kozai problem: these simulations are not
good at raising the inclinations of the captured resonant
objects (noted by Chiang and Jordan 2002, and others).
8. CONCLUSION
With the upcoming inauguration of such rapid-fire all-
sky surveys as LSST (LSST Science Collaboration et al.
2009; Jones et al. 2009) and Pan-STARRS (Grav et al.
13
2011), which are expected to detect hundreds of new
TNOs, we are entering an era when we have enough well-
characterized plutinos to be able to debias and measure
the value of f true
koz with more precision than has been pos-
sible.
Little theoretical work has been done relating the value
of f true
to the migration timescale of Neptune, but this
koz
may be an important and helpful diagnostic. To our
knowledge, no theoretical work has been done so far to
understand how the Imax distribution is set, and how
it evolves over time. There are also other relationships
that have not been explored, such as the relation between
the libration amplitude of φ32 and the Kozai libration
amplitude.
Our results allows optimization for observers planning
targeted surveys. If the goal of the survey is to find as
many plutinos as possible, the highest density on the sky
is not exactly 90◦ away from Neptune, but about 15◦ on
either side of λN ± 90◦. If the goal of the survey is to
find as many Kozai plutinos as possible, the best places
on the sky are about 12◦ above and below the ecliptic,
and 15◦ on either side of the orthoneptune points. The
value of f obs
koz that is measured in a given survey can be
significantly different from f true
koz , and careful debiasing is
necessary to derive the true value. Parameters of the sur-
vey such as pointings, field depths, tracking efficiencies,
and fields with no detections must all be characterized
in order to properly debias the results (see Jones et al.
2010).
The authors wish to thank C. Van Laerhoven, H. Levi-
son, and J. Hahn for providing us with output from their
migration simulations, and X.-S. Wan and T.-Y. Huang
for providing us with the disturbing function coefficients
for Kozai plutinos.
REFERENCES
Brown, M. E.: 2001, AJ 121, 2804
Brown, M. E.: 2008, The Largest Kuiper Belt Objects, pp
335 -- 344
Chiang, E. I. and Jordan, A. B.: 2002, AJ 124, 3430
Cohen, C. J. and Hubbard, E. C.: 1964, Science 145, 1302
Davies, J. K., McFarland, J., Bailey, M. E., Marsden, B. G., and
Ip, W.-H.: 2008, The Early Development of Ideas Concerning
the Transneptunian Region, pp 11 -- 23
Elliot, J. L., Kern, S. D., Clancy, K. B., Gulbis, A. A. S., Millis,
R. L., Buie, M. W., Wasserman, L. H., Chiang, E. I., Jordan,
A. B., Trilling, D. E., and Meech, K. J.: 2005, AJ 129, 1117
Fraser, W. C. and Kavelaars, J. J.: 2009, AJ 137, 72
Fuentes, C. I. and Holman, M. J.: 2008, AJ 136, 83
Gallardo, T., Hugo, G., and Pais, P.: 2012, Icarus 220, 392
Gladman, B., Lawler, S. M., Petit, J.-M., Kavelaars, J., Jones,
R. L., Parker, J. W., Van Laerhoven, C., Nicholson, P.,
Rousselot, P., Bieryla, A., and Ashby, M. L. N.: 2012, AJ 144,
23
Gladman, B., Marsden, B. G., and Vanlaerhoven, C.: 2008,
Nomenclature in the Outer Solar System, pp 43 -- 57
Gomes, R. S.: 2000, AJ 120, 2695
Grav, T., Jedicke, R., Denneau, L., Chesley, S., Holman, M. J.,
and Spahr, T. B.: 2011, PASP 123, 423
Hahn, J. M. and Malhotra, R.: 2005, AJ 130, 2392
Jones, R. L., Chesley, S. R., Connolly, A. J., Harris, A. W.,
Ivezic, Z., Knezevic, Z., Kubica, J., Milani, A., and Trilling,
D. E.: 2009, Earth Moon and Planets 105, 101
Jones, R. L., Gladman, B., Petit, J.-M., Rousselot, P., Mousis,
O., Kavelaars, J. J., Campo Bagatin, A., Bernabeu, G.,
Benavidez, P., Parker, J. W., Nicholson, P., Holman, M., Grav,
T., Doressoundiram, A., Veillet, C., Scholl, H., and Mars, G.:
2006, Icarus 185, 508
Jones, R. L., Parker, J. W., Bieryla, A., Marsden, B. G.,
Gladman, B., Kavelaars, J., and Petit, J.-M.: 2010, AJ 139,
2249
Kavelaars, J. J., Jones, R. L., Gladman, B. J., Petit, J., Parker,
J. W., Van Laerhoven, C., Nicholson, P., Rousselot, P., Scholl,
H., Mousis, O., Marsden, B., Benavidez, P., Bieryla, A., Campo
Bagatin, A., Doressoundiram, A., Margot, J. L., Murray, I.,
and Veillet, C.: 2009, AJ 137, 4917
Kozai, Y.: 1962, AJ 67, 591
Levison, H. F. and Duncan, M. J.: 1994, Icarus 108, 18
Levison, H. F., Morbidelli, A., Vanlaerhoven, C., Gomes, R., and
Tsiganis, K.: 2008, Icarus 196, 258
LSST Science Collaboration, Abell, P. A., Allison, J., Anderson,
S. F., Andrew, J. R., Angel, J. R. P., Armus, L., Arnett, D.,
Asztalos, S. J., Axelrod, T. S., and et al.: 2009, ArXiv e-prints
Lykawka, P. S. and Mukai, T.: 2007, Icarus 189, 213
Malhotra, R.: 1996, AJ 111, 504
Nesvorn´y, D. and Roig, F.: 2000, Icarus 148, 282
Nesvorn´y, D., Roig, F., and Ferraz-Mello, S.: 2000, AJ 119, 953
Petit, J., Kavelaars, J. J., Gladman, B., Jones, R. L., Parker,
J. W., Van Laerhoven, C., Nicholson, P., Mars, G., Rousselot,
P., Mousis, O., Marsden, B., Bieryla, A., Murray, I., Ashby,
M. L. N., Benavidez, P., Campo Bagatin, A., and Veillet, C.:
2011, AJ 142, 131
14
Schwamb, M. E., Brown, M. E., Rabinowitz, D. L., and
Tsiganis, K., Gomes, R., Morbidelli, A., and Levison, H. F.: 2005,
Ragozzine, D.: 2010, ApJ 720, 1691
Thomas, F. and Morbidelli, A.: 1996, Celestial Mechanics and
Dynamical Astronomy 64, 209
Tiscareno, M. S. and Malhotra, R.: 2009, AJ 138, 827
Nature 435, 459
Wan, X. and Huang, T.: 2007, MNRAS 377, 133
Williams, J. G. and Benson, G. S.: 1971, AJ 76, 167
|
1303.3899 | 3 | 1303 | 2013-08-06T14:54:14 | Kepler planets: a tale of evaporation | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | (Abridged) Inspired by the Kepler planet discoveries, we consider the thermal contraction of planets close to their parent star, under the influence of evaporation. The mass-loss rates are based on hydrodynamic models of evaporation that include both X-ray and EUV irradiation. We find that only low-mass planets with hydrogen envelopes are significantly affected by evaporation, with evaporation being able to remove massive hydrogen envelopes inward of 0.1 AU for Neptune-mass objects.
We construct a theoretical population of planets with varying core masses, envelope masses, orbital separations, and stellar spectral types, and compare these against the sizes and densities measured for low-mass planets, both in the Kepler mission and from radial velocity surveys. This exercise leads us to conclude that evaporation is the driving force of evolution for close-in Kepler planets. In fact, some 50% of the Kepler planet candidates may have been significantly eroded. Evaporation explains two striking correlations observed in these objects: a lack of large radius/low density planets close to the stars, and a bimodal distribution in planet sizes with a deficit of planets around 2R_E. Planets that have experienced high X-ray exposures are generally smaller than this size, and those with lower X-ray exposures are typically larger. A bimodal distribution is naturally explained by the evaporation model, where, depending on their X-ray exposure, close-in planets can either hold on to hydrogen envelopes 1% in mass, or be stripped entirely.
To quantitatively reproduce the observed features, we argue that not only do low-mass Kepler planets need to be made of rocky cores overlaid with hydrogen envelopes, but few of them should have initial masses above 20 M_E, and the majority of them should have core masses of a few Earth masses. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph |
Draft version November 1, 2018
Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11
KEPLER PLANETS: A TALE OF EVAPORATION
James E. Owen
Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, 60 St. George St., Toronto, M5S 3H8, Canada
and
Yanqin Wu
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto, ON M5S 3H4, Canada
Draft version November 1, 2018
ABSTRACT
Inspired by the Kepler mission's planet discoveries, we consider the thermal contraction of planets
close to their parent star, under the influence of evaporation. The mass-loss rates are based on
hydrodynamic models of evaporation that include both X-ray and EUV irradiation. We find that only
low-mass planets with hydrogen envelopes are significantly affected by evaporation, with evaporation
being able to remove massive hydrogen envelopes inward of ∼ 0.1 AU for Neptune-mass objects,
while being negligible for Jupiter-mass objects. Moreover, most of the evaporation occurs in the first
100 Myr of the star's lives when it is more choromospherically active. We construct a theoretical
population of planets with varying core masses, envelope masses, orbital separations, and stellar
spectral types, and compare these against the sizes and densities measured for low-mass planets,
both in the Kepler mission and from radial velocity surveys. This exercise leads us to conclude
that evaporation is the driving force of evolution for close-in Kepler planets. In fact, some 50% of
the Kepler planet candidates may have been significantly eroded. Evaporation explains two striking
correlations observed in these objects: a lack of large radius/low density planets close to the stars,
and a possible bimodal distribution in planet sizes with a deficit of planets around 2R⊕. Planets
that have experienced high X-ray exposures are generally smaller than this size, and those with lower
X-ray exposures are typically larger. A bimodal planet size distribution is naturally predicted by
evaporation model, where, depending on their X-ray exposure, close-in planets can either hold on
to hydrogen envelopes ∼ 0.5-1% in mass, or be stripped entirely. To quantitatively reproduce the
observed features, we argue that not only do low-mass Kepler planets need to be made of rocky cores
overlaid with hydrogen envelopes, but few of them should have initial masses above 20M⊕, and the
majority of them should have core masses of a few Earth masses.
Subject headings: planets and satellites: composition, formation, interiors, physical evolution
1.
INTRODUCTION
The spectacular success of the Kepler mission has
yielded thousands of planetary candidates (e.g. Borucki
et al. 2011; Batalha et al. 2013). Most of these exoplanets
are smaller than Neptune (4R⊕) and are likely to have
masses between a few, to tens of earth masses. We can
now hope to make substantial progress in understanding
the origin and evolution of planetary systems by study-
ing the interior composition and orbital structure of these
objects.
However, well-known degeneracies prevents us from
resolving their interior composition. A typical Kepler
planet is likely composed of a dense core and a tenu-
ous envelope: the core can be volatile-rich, rock-rich or
iron-rich; the envelope can consist of steam or hydro-
gen/helium. Unlike the case of main-sequence stars, ra-
dius measurement of these systems (all that is possible
for most Kepler candidates) can not be used to constrain
their structure. Even in the case where planetary masses
are measured (via transit-timing-variations, TTV, or ra-
dial velocity, RV), multiple solutions for the interior
structure exist. For instance, a Neptune-massed planet,
with a density of 2 g cm−3, can have either a thin hydro-
[email protected]
[email protected]
gen/helium envelope surrounding a dense rocky core, or
be entirely ice/water dominated (e.g. Adams et al. 2008;
Rogers & Seager 2010).
But this degeneracy can be broken by studying a pop-
ulation of planets and investigating how planetary sizes
and densities correlate with their physical environment
(Wu & Lithwick 2013).
In particular, for those plan-
ets at close separations from their parent star (<0.2
AU), the total received high energy irradiation over Gyr
time-scales can represent a considerable fraction of their
gravitational binding-energy (e.g. Lammer et al. 2003;
Lecavelier des Etangs 2007; Davis & Wheatley 2009). If
these planets have hydrogen-rich envelopes, evaporation
of these envelopes could markedly reduce their sizes and
increase their bulk densities, when compared to planets
further out.
Two recent studies have looked for correlations with
separation. Ciardi et al. (2013) note that, for pairs of Ke-
pler planets that are bigger than Neptune (4R⊕, these al-
most certainly have hydrogen envelopes), the inner plan-
ets are more frequently the smaller ones. However, they
do not observe such a hierarchy in pairs smaller than
Neptune. Therefore, they concluded that the correla-
tions may be a result of the planet formation process,
as opposed to any post-formation process. This con-
clusion contrasts with that arrived by Wu & Lithwick
2
Owen, J.E. & Wu, Y.
(2013); in this study, they measure planetary masses in
a sample of TTV pairs and find that, within pairs, the
inner planets tend to be denser. Moreover, when con-
sidering all available mass measurements together, they
find that planet densities increase with decreasing or-
bital periods. Therefore, they conclude that the low-
mass planets observed by Kepler are composed of dense
rocky cores overlaid with various amounts of hydrogen in
their envelopes, which are then sculpted by evaporation.
The same density and radius trends are encapsulated in
many of the Kepler multi-planet systems, e.g., Kepler-11
(Lissauer et al. 2011), Kepler-18 (Cochran et al. 2011),
Kepler-20 (Gautier et al. 2012) & Kepler-36 (Carter et al.
2012), as well as reported by recent radial velocity stud-
ies (Weiss et al. 2013). Thus an important question has
arisien: are the observed correlations (radius/density vs.
distance) results of formation or evaporation?
On the theoretical side, there is a large body of litera-
ture discussing planet evaporation, ever since the first hot
Jupiters were discovered (e.g. Lammer et al. 2003; Yelle
2004; Tian et al. 2005; Hubbard et al. 2007a,b; Murray-
Clay et al. 2009; Koskinen et al. 2010; Owen & Jackson
2012). Most of these deal with gas-giants, and only a
few focus specifically on low-mass planets. We summa-
rize two works here that are of direct relevance to our
discussion.
Owen & Jackson (2012) develop realistic models of
hydrodynamic evaporation for low-mass planets, includ-
ing both X-ray and EUV irradiation. They perform
the calculations on planet models of different densities
and radii. They identify that only low mass-planets
(Mp < 60 M⊕) could experience a significant effect from
evaporation and suggest that evaporation may lead to
a stability boundary below which all observed planets
should lie (e.g. Koskinen et al. 2007). Lacking a ther-
mal evolution model, they could not make predictions
on final planet radius and density. The detailed evapo-
ration models allow Owen & Jackson (2012) to calibrate
the evaporation efficiency and they argue that this pa-
rameter can vary by orders of magnitude over the stellar
and planetary lifetimes. Their work also highlight the
relative importances of X-ray versus EUV evaporation.
Lopez et al. (2012) provide the only significant attempt
to study the combined effects of thermal evolution and
evaporation. Adopting a simplified energy-limited for-
malism for evaporation and a constant efficiency factor
-the caveats of which are discussed in Section 2- and
they also infer the presence of an evaporation thresh-
old. They find that since the evaporation time-scale
scales with planet mass × planet density, that planets
with mass×density above a critical value would be evap-
orated above it. But as is demonstrated by Owen & Jack-
son (2012), a simplistic evaporation model may severely
over- or under-estimate the mass-loss rates, especially in
the first stages of the stars' and planets' lives.
Now with the large Kepler data set, evaporation of
low-mass planets deserves a better study and a direct
comparison with the observations. Moreover, it is useful
to be able to predict the final planet size and density, for
a given initial model. This allows us to backtrack the
original planetary structures at formation. To accom-
plish these goals, we need to improve on previous work,
in particular, we need to couple realistic calculations of
evaporation with thermal evolution models.
We describe our approach in Section 3, after briefly
reviewing the evaporation theory in Section 2. We then
compare our theoretical results directly against obser-
vations in Section 4. Our evaporation theory success-
fully explains a number of observed facts, establishing
that evaporation is the driving process of evolution for
close-in Kepler planets.
In fact, some 50% of the cur-
rently known Kepler planets may have been significantly
affected by evaporation. Finally, we discuss the caveat
and implications of our work in Section 5 and conclude
in Section 6.
2. PHYSICS OF PLANETARY EVAPORATION
Planet evaporation can take place through a variety
of mechanisms: non-thermal escape; thermal Jean's es-
cape and hydrodynamic escape. Hydrodynamic evapo-
ration occurs when the density of the heated region is
sufficiently high so that the gas is collisional even in the
super-sonic region of the flow. Thus, it is only hydrody-
namic evaporation that can produce high enough mass-
loss to affect the structure and sculpt the planet, which
occurs at high incident fluxes; we focus on this mecha-
nism.
As high-energy photons from the star ionize gas in the
upper envelope (either hydrogen or metals), the newly
freed electrons heat up the local gas and the atmosphere
expands. A flow may be initiated that eventually es-
capes from the gravitational well of the planet. Let the
efficiency of converting received energy to P dV work be
η, so the mass-loss rate is simply:
M = η
LHER3
p
4GMpa2
(1)
where LHE is the high energy luminosity (X-rays or
EUV), Mp is the planet mass, Rp is the planet radius
and a is the separation from the parent star.
The usual so-called 'energy-limited' approach is equiv-
alent of taking η to be an order-unity constant (e.g. Wat-
son et al. 1981; Lammer et al. 2003; Lecavelier des Etangs
2007; Erkaev et al. 2007). Under such an assumption,
the evaporative time-scale is Mp/ M ∝ Mpρ/FHE, where
FHE is the high energy flux. So Equation 1 lends itself
to an evaporation threshold in terms of mass×density
(Lopez et al. 2012).
However, the evaporation efficiency is not always con-
stant but may vary significantly with planet mass, radius
and the ionizing flux (see Section 5). Murray-Clay et al.
(2009) demonstrated that, in the case of EUV evapora-
tion of hot Jupiters, the 'energy limited' approximation
is only valid at low fluxes. At high fluxes, the mass-
loss process is controlled by the ionization/recombination
balance, yielding mass-loss rates that scale as L1/2
EUV/a,
or, the 'efficiency' (η) decreases with flux. This limit (the
'recombination-dominated' regime) is similar to EUV
driven evaporation of gas clumps (Bertoldi & McKee
1990) and protoplanetary discs (e.g. Johnstone et al.
1998; Hollenbach et al. 2000).
For X-ray ionization, Owen & Jackson (2012) showed
similarly that the evaporation is not 'energy-limited', but
rather the 'efficiency' is controlled by line cooling, and is
a strong function of planet mass. They found that cool-
ing is most important for high mass Jovian planets, since
Planetary Evaporation
3
the higher planet escape temperature and larger physi-
cal size mean flow time-scale is long. Then there is then
much time to radiate away the received heating when the
flow is still sub-sonic. For lower mass, Neptune-like plan-
ets, the escape velocity is much lower and the physical
sizes smaller, meaning the flow time-scale is shorter, so
much less energy is radiated away and the correspond-
ing 'efficiency' (η) is higher. While Owen & Jackson
(2012) found that the X-ray evaporation gives a simi-
lar flux-scaling as given in Equation 1, the flow is not
close to being 'energy-limited' (where P dV work is the
dominant energy loss channel), and only begins to ap-
proach an energy-limited case at low masses < 3 M⊕.
Furthermore, Owen & Jackson (2012) noted that unlike
the EUV case, since the X-ray driven mass-loss scaled as
LX /a2 at high and low fluxes there is no transition from
line-cooling limited to energy limited at low X-ray fluxes.
The ionizing flux from a main-sequence star varies by
orders of magnitude through its life.
In addition, the
size of a planet also changes over time, under both ther-
mal contraction and mass-loss, along with the mass of
the planet decreasing. With η being a function of planet
mass and radius, as well as the ionizing flux (see Fig-
ure 12), one should not adopt a constant η (as in Lopez
et al. 2012) in tracing out the evaporation history of
the planet. It is important that the correct prescription
of evaporation is used to follow the planetary evolution,
particularly for low mass planets where evaporation can
significantly affect the evolution. This is essential if one
wants to make inferences about the initial state of these
planets.
The last issue worth attention is the nature of the ion-
izing flux. Which source of high energy luminosity is
driving the evaporation has only been tackled recently.
Some authors have purely used EUV flux in their stud-
ies (e.g. Lecavelier des Etangs 2007), while others have
used only the X-rays (Jackson et al. 2012). Owen &
Jackson (2012) solved the flow problem including both
X-ray and EUV irradiation. They found that the posi-
tion of the transition from sub-sonic to super-sonic flow
(the 'sonic point'), relative to the respective ionization
fronts, determines whether X-rays or EUV is driving the
mass-loss. At a similar ionizing energy flux, they found
that X-ray drives the mass-loss when the flux is high, and
EUV dominates the mass-loss when the flux is low. For
the first ∼ 100 Myrs of their lives, main-sequence stars
have X-ray luminosities that reach up to ∼ 10−3 of their
bolometric luminosities; this fraction falls off with time
roughly as 1/t as the stars age (Gudel 2004; Ribas et al.
2005; Jackson et al. 2012).
3. EVOLUTIONARY MODELS OF PLANETARY
EVAPORATION
In order to follow the evolution of a close-in planet,
we need to include the effects of thermal cooling of the
planet, irradiation of its upper atmosphere and mass-loss
in the form of hydrodynamic evaporation. Previously,
Lopez et al. (2012) have addressed this problem by cou-
pling the Fortney et al. (2007b) and Nettelmann et al.
(2011) planetary structure models to a simplistic energy-
limited estimate for the mass-loss. We aim to achieve a
similar goal here, but we will base our mass-loss rate on
a realistic calculation that include both the X-ray and
EUV radiation (Owen & Jackson 2012). We make use
of the mesa stellar evolution code (Paxton et al. 2011,
2013) to model the thermal evolution and couple it to
the Owen & Jackson mass-loss calculations.
3.1. Method
The general purpose mesa code provides the frame-
work to simulate planetary structure and evolution. Our
planet models have solid inner cores, experience irradia-
tion (under the two stream approximation, e.g. Guillot
2010), and evaporation. The mesa equations of state is
discussed in detail in Paxton et al. (2011), but in the
planetary regime is typically based on the SCVH equa-
tion of state (Saumon et al. 1995). The opacity tables
are used for the irradiation of the atmosphere are based
on an updated verision of the Freedman et al. (2008),
as detailed in Paxton et al. (2013), where we adopt an
opacity κ∗ = 4 × 10−3 cm2 g−1 to the incoming stellar
irradiation suitable for a solar type star (Guillot 2010).
To include evaporation, we tabulate the mass-loss rates
as functions of ionizing flux, planet mass and planet ra-
dius, using the results in Owen & Jackson (2012). The
tabulated results span a range in planet mass from 1M⊕
to 3MJ , and in planet radius from 1R⊕ to ∼ 0.01 AU
(roughly the Hill radius at 0.1 AU for our most mas-
sive planet). For the ionizing X-ray flux, we adopt the
observed relation between this flux and stellar spectral
type and stellar age (Jackson et al. 2012).
In general,
the X-ray luminosity saturates at ∼ 10−3 of the stellar
bolometric luminosity during the first ∼ 100 Myrs of the
star's life, and decays approximately as 1/t afterwards.
Furthermore, following Owen & Jackson (2012), we take
the EUV luminosity to follow the same time evolution of
the X-rays.
Since convective transport is the dominant heat trans-
port mechanism in the planet's envelope, the thermal
structure of the envelope is set to be initially adiabatic,
in the absence of irradiation. The radius of the planet
is defined to be at a radius where the optical depth to
the incoming bolometric radiation is 2/3, and is typi-
cally around miliBar (for younger and lower mass plan-
ets) to Bar (for older and more massive planets) pres-
sures for the planets considered here. This planet ra-
dius is also taken as the input radius in the evaporation
model. Since the atmosphere's underlying scale height is
typically small compared to the planet radius, such an
approximation is accurate. For the same reason, we have
ignored the difference between the above radius and the
radius a planet exhibits at transit (Hubbard et al. 2001).
But such a simplification may break down for the closest
in planets at the earliest times, where there may be a
∼ 10% difference in a planet's optical photosphere and
the base of the evaporative flow. However, given that
planets quickly contract through such a phase, the ef-
fect will be negligible when integrated over the Gyrs of
planetary evolution.
Our planets are composed of two separate regions: an
envelope of Hydrogen/Helium with a metalicity at solar
abundances (as used for the evaporation models), and a
solid core. Given the large range of possible core com-
positions, as a starting point we focus on a pure rock
core, using the mass-radius profile provided by Fortney
et al. (2007a,b), with core masses (Mc) of 6.5, 7.5, 10,
12.5 & 15 M⊕ adopted. These cores are assumed to of
4
Owen, J.E. & Wu, Y.
Fig. 1. -- Benchmark calculations of our modified version of mesa
against the calculations of Fortney & Nettelmann (2010) for 95
(squares) & 32 (circles) M⊕ planets at a seperation of 0.045 AU
from a sun-like star. Our calculations are shown for three initial
cooling times of 105 (solid line), 106 (dashed line) and 107 (dot-
dashed line) years. Agreement is at the ≤ 5% level in all cases.
fixed radius and do not evolve during the planets evolu-
tion. However, the cores do have a thermal content from
from both radioactive decay and thermal heat capacity
where we adopt an earth-like value (see Nettelmann et
al. 2011, Lopez et al. 2012). Both of which are im-
plemented in mesa using the core luminosity function
(Paxton et al. 2013). As current planet formation mod-
els are unable to provide a good handle on the initial
thermal properties of formed planets (e.g. 'hot' or 'cold'
start) we consider initial models with a wide range of ini-
tial radii. This initial radii (or more correctly entropy)
is parametrised in terms of an initial cooling time (tcool),
which we define as the ratio of a planet's initial inter-
nal energy to a planet's initial luminosity. We could of
course parametrise the initial entropy in terms of some
other variables; however, the initial cooling time is per-
haps the most interesting as this be compared to proto-
planetary discs lifetimes ∼3 Myr (e.g. Haisch et al. 2001;
Hern´andez et al. 2007; Owen et al. 2011; Armitage 2011).
In order to make sure our model is following the evo-
lution of low-mass planets accurately we benchmark our
calculations against the models presented in Fortney &
Nettelmann (2010 - their Figure 10); the calculations
were performed using the Fortney et al.
(2007a) code
for a 95 & 32 M⊕ planet with a 25 M⊕ core1 that is a
50/50 mix (by mass) of ice and rock. We follow the evo-
lution of these planets under the influence of irradiation
by a sun-like star, but no evaporation. We find excellent
agreement to these calculations at the ≤ 5% level giving
confidence our modified version of mesa is performing
as expected at low-masses. In Figure 1 we show the ra-
dius evolution of our calculations for cooling times of 105
(solid line), 106 (dashed line) and 107 (dot-dashed line)
years. These calculations are compared against the re-
sults from the Fortney & Nettelmann (2010) at a separa-
tion of 0.045AU shown as points for both the 95 (squares)
& 32 (circles) M⊕ planets.
For our calculations we choose values of tcool (com-
Fig. 2. -- The top panel shows the radius evolution of Jupiter like
planets as a function of time since gas disc clearing, at a very close
separation to their parent star (∼ 0.025 AU); the bottom panel
shows the mass evolution of this planet. The solid line represents a
planet with an initially high entropy with an initial cooling time of
106 years, the dashed line has an initial cooling time of 107 years,
and the dotted line has an initially low entropy with an initial
cooling time of 108 years.
puted in the absence of irradiation) in the range 3 ×
106 − 108 years to span a range of 'hot' start and 'cold'
start model, similar to those values chosen by Lopez et
al. (2012). We note that with cooling times < 3 × 106
years most low mass planets at separations < 0.1 AU
have initial radii larger than their Hill radii, and they
cannot be considered hydrostatically bound objects.
For each cooling time and each core mass, we construct
40 models with a range of envelope masses from 3 MJ
to a few percent of the core mass, logarithmicly spaced
in envelope mass. The planets are then evolved forward
in time, under the influence of evaporation and irradi-
ation for 10 Gyrs or until the entire envelope is lost2.
Our integrations begin at 3 Myrs, a time at which the
protoplanetary disc clears and the planet is fully exposed
to the X-ray and EUV irradiation. In general the plan-
ets evaporation begins in the X-ray driven phase, and
may switch to EUV driven at some late time. Where the
planets' final mass is set by a few 100 Myrs.
3.2. Jupiter-like planets
Jupiter mass planets close to their central stars repre-
sent the case where there is direct observational evidence
(e.g. Vidal-Madjar et al. 2003, 2004) of evaporation oc-
curring. Thus, it is worth investigating whether their
are any evolutionary consequences for the evaporation of
high-mass planets. For example, Baraffe et al. (2004)
noted that if the evaporation rate was high enough, so
1 We note the Fortney et al. (2007) calculations used a core with
no thermal contribution and we do the same for the benchmark
calculations.
2 Thus, we ignore any subsequent mass-loss from the core due
to sublimation, which may happen at the highest equilibrium tem-
peratures Teq (cid:38) 2000 K (e.g. Perez-Becker & Chiang 2013).
10610710810910100.40.60.811.21.41.6Time [years]Radius [RJ]15202530Radius [R⊕]10610710810910100.990.9920.9940.9960.9981Time since disc clearing [years]Mass/Initial Mass that the evaporation time (∼ Mp/ M ) became compara-
ble to the thermal time of the planet's envelope, then
a Jupiter mass planet could loose its entire envelope
rapidly. Such an inference was based upon the rather
unrealistic assumption of 100% mass-loss efficiency. In
reality, at high masses the mass-loss rates never reach
such high values (see Owen & Jackson 2012 for a more
detailed discussion). To illustrate this we show the evolu-
tion of a Jupiter-like planet at a very close separation of
0.025 AU around a solar type star in Figure 2. We plot
the radius and mass evolution of planets with a 15M⊕
rock core and cooling times ranging from the very short
(106 years - solid) to the very long (108 years- dotted).
Figure 2 clearly shows that evaporation is unable to effect
the planets' evolution and planets with very different ini-
tial cooling times end up on almost identical evolutionary
tracts at late times. With the mass-change in the plan-
ets at the < 1% level, as argued for by Hubbard et al.
(2007a).
Therefore, while Jupiter mass planets currently pro-
vided the best opportunity for actually studying the hy-
drodynamics of evaporation by directly probing the flow,
they do not provide a good laboratory for studying the
evolutionary consequences of evaporation and we must
go towards lower mass planets where the evolutionary
effect will be more pronounced.
3.3. Low-mass planets
Unlike the Jupiter-type planets discussed above, sev-
eral authors have suggested that the effects of evapora-
tion will be more prominent around lower mass planets
(e.g. Hubbard et al. 2007a; Baraffe et al. 2008; Jackson
et al. 2012; Owen & Jackson 2012; Lopez et al. 2012). At
lower masses evaporation can begin to sculpt the planet
population, removing significant amounts of a planet's
envelope during its lifetime. To investigate this we show
the evolution of a low mass planet in Figure 3, where we
consider the evolution of a 'standard' model which is an
initially 20 M⊕ planet with a 12.5 M⊕ core. Figure 3
shows the evolution of the 'standard' model for the full
range of initial cooling times considered. The planets are
at a close separation of ∼0.05 AU and have equilibrium
temperatures of 1300K. Where we define the equilibrium
temperature as the black body temperature at a given
separation, i.e.:
(cid:114)
Teq = T∗
R∗
2a
,
(2)
where T∗ and R∗ are the parent star's temperature and
radius respectfully.
The panels in Figure 3 show the qualitative features
of the evolution of low-mass planets. In particular, plan-
ets with higher initial entropies have initially larger radii
and therefore loose more mass. The result is that plan-
ets with shorter initial cooling times end up with, smaller
radii and higher densities than planets with longer ini-
tial cooling times. At low masses evaporation plays a
strong role in planetary evolution, which in the case of
our 'standard' model makes the planets a factor of ∼ 2
smaller and a factor of ∼ 4 denser compared to the same
planet that is not undergoing evaporation. In this case
an initial envelope containing ∼ 40% of the original mass
is evaporated down to one containing only few percent
of the total mass, and in the most extreme case (for the
Planetary Evaporation
5
planet with an initial cooling time of 3× 106 years) evap-
oration leaves a planet with 0.5% of the total mass in a
Hydrogen/Helium envelope.
The bottom, right-hand panel of Figure 3 shows the
M ×age, which indicates when the mass-loss
evolution of
is most significant. This plot shows that in all cases the
mass-loss is most important at roughly the point where
the X-ray luminosity begins to decline. This is easy to
understand as at early times the planets are large and
the fluxes are high, so the planet can absorb a significant
amount of high energy radiation. Once the X-rays begin
to decline the planet evolution is affected less by evapo-
ration and once the evaporation switches to EUV driven
the final planet properties have already been 'frozen' in,
similar to the results from the previous models calculated
by Owen & Jackson (2012) and Lopez et al. (2012). This
is a rather generic feature of all the evolutionary models,
where the saturation time-scale for the X-rays sets the
length of time which evaporation is important in driving
the planets' evolution, and that there is very little change
in the planets' mass from 100 Myrs to 10 Gyrs.
4. POPULATION STUDY AND COMPARISON AGAINST
OBSERVATIONS
We have shown that, for low mass planets close to their
parent star, a significant amount of the planet's gaseous
envelope, or even an entire atmosphere, can be removed
in Gyr time-scales.3 Given the prominent role evapo-
ration can play, we can use this evolution to make in-
ferences about the initial structure of observed close-in
planets, and provide clues as to their formation. In the
following, we provide comparisons between our theoreti-
cal models and observations, mostly using data from the
Kepler mission. The effects of evaporation are clearly
visible in data. In fact, the evaporation model naturally
explains a number of remarkable correlations seen in the
Kepler data.
In Figure 4, we plot the final planet mass and radius as
a function of separation for planets with initial proper-
ties which vary from our 'standard' model, where central
star has 1 M(cid:12) in all cases. At a given planet mass, a
lower core mass results in initially larger planets, which
means that the planet can absorb a larger fraction of the
X-ray flux, driving stronger evaporative flows. So plan-
ets with smaller cores may lose the entire envelope at a
larger separations than those with larger cores (see Fig-
ure 8). The initial cooling time shows the same effect
as discussed above, with shorter cooling times resulting
in more mass-loss due to the initially larger radii; how-
ever, this effect is much less important than the effect
of initial core mass. Finally, evaporation can drive con-
vergent evolution. For instance, planets at < 0.05AU
that had initial 15 M⊕ cores, but envelopes of 2 & 5
M⊕ end with somewhat identical structures This means
that, at least in some cases, it may be difficult to retrieve
the planets' initial structure, particularly at low envelope
mass-fractions.
4.1. Upper Envelope in Planet Radius
3 We ignore all Jovian planets from now on. When comparing
against Kepler data, this is naturally achieved by only plotting
planets in multiple systems.
6
Owen, J.E. & Wu, Y.
Fig. 3. -- The evolution of a 20 M⊕ planet with a 12.5 M⊕ core at a separation of 0.05 AU is plotted, with four initial cooling times:
3 × 106 years (dashed); 1 × 107 years (solid); 3 × 107 years (dotted); 1 × 108 years (dot-dashed). In the upper left we show the radius
evolution, the density evolution is shown in the upper right, the mass evolution in the bottom left and in the bottom right we show the
M × age which indicates the times at which most mass-loss is occurring, with the thin continuation to these lines show
time evolution of
the point at which the evaporation switches from X-ray driven to EUV driven. The final properties of the same planet not undergoing
evaporation are shown by the small arrows.
The Kepler transiting-planet catalogue is the most ex-
tensive catalogue of planets on close orbits to their par-
ent star; for better statistics, we use the Kepler object
of interest (KOI) catalogue, which lists the radii (not
mass) of planet candidates. Most of the KOIs have not
been confirmed as planets, and there is a certain, but
low, percentage of false positives (Morton & Johnson
2011). To minimize contamination, we choose to con-
sider only KOIs that have been identified as being in
multiple systems, where the significance of planetary na-
ture is considerably higher ((cid:38) 95% Lissauer et al. 2012).
The use of only multi-planet systems, while the most ro-
bust, may introduce some implicit biases. In particular,
planets that may have been dynamically moved to small
orbital periods at late times, will have a undergone a dif-
ferent evolutionary path. Since we are interested in the
long term evolution of planets due to evaporation, then
the multi-planets KOIs represents the cleanest sample to
begin with.
Plotting planet radius against separation for planets
in multi-planet systems around solar-type stars (T∗ =
5200−6200 K) we notice an upper-envelope in planet size
that rises with separation. This has also been noticed by
Ciardi et al. (2013) and Wu & Lithwick (2013). The
lack of large planets at small separations is statistically
significant: we cut the sample into 4 regions: large and
small planets with a division at Rp = 5 R⊕ and hot
and cold planets with a division at Teq = 1000K, then
comparing the ratio of large cold planets to the ratio of
small cold planets. Where one would expect to observe
∼ 20 hot large planets if these are the same populations,
we find only 3.
We also argue that selection effect in the Kepler
pipeline would not produce such an upper envelope. KOI
candidates have to have a certain signal to noise ratio
to be identified. This favours detecting smaller planets
closer to the stars, as they have produced a larger number
of transits during the mission lifetime. The completeness
radius (sizes above which the KOI catalogue is complete)
will rise with planet periods, similar to the upper en-
velope discussed here. We draw such a curve for the
sub-sample considered by (Petigura et al. 2013) in Fig-
ure 5, which lies far below the upper envelope. Though
more noisy stars than those considered by (Petigura et al.
2013) will move this curve upward, it will not explain the
upper envelope.
This upper envelope is naturally explained by evapora-
tion: low density planets can not survive in the environ-
ment of high ionizing flux. Quantitatively, evaporation
of 20M⊕ planets with rocky cores of masses 10-15 M⊕
provides a good fit to the upper envelope, as is shown in
Figure 5.
There is another implication to this agreement.
If
there were a significant population of planets with ini-
tial masses higher than, say, 30M⊕ (dotted line in Fig-
ure 5), we would not expect to observe the same upper
envelope. These more massive planets can hold on to
their atmospheres, much like the hot Jupiters can (see
Section 3.2), and would populate the upper left region
in Figure 5. The absence of these more massive plan-
ets is interesting: perhaps not coincidentally, as 20 − 30
M⊕ roughly corresponds to gap-opening mass in this re-
gion, suggesting that there is ceiling to how much gas
the planets can accrete in this neighbourhood. The core
51020Radius [R⊕]0.010.1110Denstiy [g cm−3]1061071081091010101214161820Time since disc clearing [years]Mass [M⊕]106107108109101010−310−210−1100101Lost Mass (Mdot × Time) [M⊕] Planetary Evaporation
7
Fig. 5. -- The upper envelope of planet sizes as a function of
equilibrium temperature . The open circles show the Kepler Object
of Interests that are around solar type stars (T∗ = 5200 − 6200 K)
and are in multiple transiting systems. The black curves are the
theoretical final radii for planet models with initial mass 20 M⊕
and 10 (dashed), 12.5 (solid) & 15 M⊕ (dot-dashed) of rocky cores.
The dotted line are for ∼ 30 M⊕ planets with 12.5 M⊕ cores.
All models here have an initial cooling time of 107 years. The
thin line shows the 50% completeness limit calculated by Petigura
et al. (2013) -solid- and extrapolated -dashed- to larger and smaller
separations.
Fig. 4. -- Final planet radius (top panel) and mass (top panel) as
a function of separation, for models with different initial core mass
(labelled as Mc), total mass (labelled as Mp) and initial cooling
time (thin lines for 3 × 106 yrs and thick lines for 108 yrs, longer
cooling time indicates lower internal entropy). The central star is
sun-like. The straight dotted lines show the masses and radii of
the rocky cores alone. Planets inward of ∼ 0.1 AU experience sig-
nificant mass-loss and can retain only a fraction of their primordial
atmospheres (depending on the core mass), with the hottest ones
exposed to bare cores. As a result, the maximum radii of these
planets decrease inward.
mass also somewhat affects the upper envelope. We find
that models with roughly half of the total mass in the
rocky cores best reproduce the data, consistent with the
conclusion in Wu & Lithwick (2013).
In contrast, the
planet's initial cooling time makes little difference to the
results.
4.1.1. Dependence on Stellar Spectral Types
The mass of the parent star is an important consider-
ation. The parent stars direct influences on the evapo-
ration, through its gravity is small. However, the total
received X-ray flux at a fixed bolometric flux (so fixed
equilibrium temperature) can vary greatly, with late-type
stars being significantly more X-ray luminous when in-
tegrated over Gyr time-scales (Gudel 2004; Gudel et al.
2007; Jackson et al. 2012). We demonstrate this by con-
sidering the evolution of the 'standard' planet discussed
above (Mp = 20 M⊕, Mc = 12.5 M⊕), at a fixed equi-
librium temperature (1300K) around a later-type (0.5
M(cid:12)) and earlier-type (1.5 M(cid:12)) star compared to a planet
around a solar type star, all with initial cooling times of
107 years.
The evolution of these planets, is shown in Figure 6,
Fig. 6. -- The panels show the radius (top panel) and mass (bot-
tom panel) evolution of a planet (20 M⊕) with an equilibrium
temperature of 1300K (∼0.05 AU around a solar type star) and
12.5 M⊕ rock core, around a 1.5 M(cid:12) star (dot-dashed), 1 M(cid:12) star
(solid) & 0.5M(cid:12) star (dashed). The solid lines are identical to the
solid lines in Figure 3.
where the radius evolution is in the top panel and the
mass evolution in the bottom panel.
Naively, one would expect a similar evolution as the
bolometric flux revived is identical in all cases. However,
the variation of X-ray luminosity with stellar mass results
in qualitatively different evolutionary paths for the plan-
ets, with order-unity differences in both the final planet
2345678Radius [R⊕]0.1121416182022Seperation [AU]Mass [M⊕]Mp=20 Mc=12.5Mp=20 Mc=12.5Mp=20 Mc=15Mp=20 Mc=15Mp=17 Mc=15Mp=17 Mc=1550010000123456789Equilbrium Temperature [K]Radius [R⊕]10610710810910101214161820Time since disc clearing [years]Mass [M⊕]M∗=1M⊙M∗=0.5M⊙M∗=1.5M⊙6810121416Radius [R⊕]M∗=1.5M⊙M∗=1M⊙M∗=0.5M⊙ 8
Owen, J.E. & Wu, Y.
mass and final planet radius. The planet around the
0.5 M(cid:12) star has had its envelope completely removed,
whereas the planet around the 1.5 M(cid:12) planet still has a
∼ 3 M⊕ envelope remaining after 10 Gyrs.
We can go further and compare our evaporation thresh-
old found above for solar type stars to KOIs around other
types of host stars. Lower mass stars (e.g., M-dwarfs)
have higher X-ray flux, when compared to their bolomet-
ric luminosities. They also remain choromospherically
active for longer periods. Figure 6 shows that, indeed, at
the same equilibrium temperature (measuring the bolo-
metric flux), the upper envelope around lower mass stars
appear to be suppressed to smaller planet sizes.
Currently, the numbers of candidates around A/F and
M stars are not as large as those around G/K stars.
Thus, a fully quantitative comparison is not possible at
this stage. Moreover, planet radii determination around
M-stars suffer large uncertainties (Muirhead et al. 2012;
Mann et al. 2012; Morton & Swift 2013), and radius de-
termination for hot stars can also be polluted by the
presence of sub-giants (Brown et al. 2011), and must
bare this in mind when drawing inferences. We deter-
mine the theoretical evaporation threshold by extracting
a linear relation between the maximum radii and equilib-
rium temperature, for planets with an initial mass of 20
M⊕ and a core mass in the range 10 − 15 M⊕, that are
orbiting around a solar-type star and have equilibrium
temperature in the range of 500 − 2000 K. Since the to-
tal mass loss roughly scales linearly with the integrated
X-ray flux, we expect the same radius threshold to ap-
ply to planets around all spectral types, when we arrange
them by their X-ray exposure. This is shown in Figure 7,
where the planets are separated by the spectral type of
their parent star.4 In contrast, we show the same planet
radii plotted against their bolometric exposure. Planets
satisfy the same evaporation threshold only when one
considers X-ray exposure. This argues that the ioniz-
ing flux, not the bolometric flux, is what determines the
upper envelope. Furthermore, we also show the KOIs
in single planet systems in Figure 7 as small filled cir-
cles, which show the same behaviour as the multi-planet
KOIs, although with slightly more scatter.
4.2. Distribution of Radius
Our analysis in the previous sections suggest that the
observed radius cut-off in KOIs is related to the fact that
the most massive KOIs5 have masses not much exceeding
20M(cid:12) and that their core masses are roughly half of their
total masses. Here, we investigate the nature of all KOIs
by studying the overall radius distribution.
In Figure 8, we present the final radii of multiple se-
quences of planet models with initial cooling times in the
range 3 × 106 − 108 years. These have core masses from
6.5 M⊕ to 15 M⊕, and atmosphere masses from approx-
imately one percent of the core mass to much larger val-
ues. The total planet masses are restricted to < 20M⊕.
We do not consider atmospheres with masses below one
percent, motivated by the discussion below. The radii
are evaluated after 10 Gyrs of orbiting around a sun-like
4 Since the evolution of the X-ray luminosity is poorly known
for stars < 0.45 M(cid:12), we approximate the X-ray evolution of these
stars with that of a 0.45 M(cid:12) star.
5 Aagin, we exclude Jovian planets from this discussion.
Fig. 7. -- The observed radii of KOIs are plotted against their
bolometric exposure (bolometric flux received at surface integrated
over 10 Gyrs, left panels), and X-ray exposure (same but for X-ray
exposure, using Jackson et al. 2012 values, right panels). The ob-
jects are roughly separated into those around A/F stars (top pan-
els), G/K stars (middle-panels) and M-dwarfs (lower panels, the
red squares stand for the system KOI 961). KOI multis are shown
as open circles while KOI singles as small dots. As predicted by
our models of x-ray evaporation, planets around stars of different
spectral types, while having very different bolometric exposure,
have roughly the same maximum sizes at a given x-ray exposure.
The solid lines show the theoretical evaporation threshold derived
from a linear fit to the black evaporation curves shown in Figure 5.
The right panels demonstrate that planets around different types
of stars satisfy the same maximum radius/X-ray exposure relation
as that found around solar-type stars. One cannot perform the
same exercise in the left panels.
Fig. 8. -- The final radii of planets with an initial mass < 20M⊕,
as a function of separation from a sun-like star. Different colours
represent different core masses with blue standing for 15 M⊕ core,
red for 12.5 M⊕ core, black 10 M⊕, magenta 7.5 M⊕ & green
6.5 M⊕. We consider atmospheres as low in mass as one percent
of the core mass. For all models, there is a critical separation
within which the planets are evaporated down to bare cores. This
separation is larger for models with smaller core masses.
0.010.11123456789Seperation [AU]Radius [R⊕] Planetary Evaporation
9
star, though the values differ little if we instead evaluate
at 1 Gyrs (e.g. Lopez et al. 2012; Lammer et al. 2013).
Figure 10 shows the corresponding planet densities as a
function of separation and is discussed in Section 4.3.
The overall population show the general feature noted
previously, that the radius decreases with decreasing sep-
aration. One particularly interesting feature that ap-
pears is a gap in radius between planets that have gaseous
envelopes, and those that are bare cores. For instance,
for the 6.5 M⊕ core models, inward of ∼ 0.1 AU, all
planets have their atmospheres stripped away with their
final sizes reflecting that of their naked rocky cores; while
outside ∼ 0.1 AU, planets can retain atmospheres that
are at least a fraction of a percent in mass, consequently
they have sizes that are markedly larger. This bifurca-
tion generates a gap in planet radius. The orbital sep-
aration at which this gap appears is smaller for planets
that have bigger cores and stronger surface gravity. How-
ever, inside ∼ 0.03AU there are no surviving planets with
gaseous envelopes.
The origin for this gap is easy to understand. As plan-
ets lose their hydrogen atmosphere, they become increas-
ingly compact and dense, which reduces the mass-loss
rate. However, there is also less hydrogen to lose. So
for planets inside the critical separation, the loss is total
(e.g. Baraffe et al. 2006; Lopez et al. 2012). While
for planets just outside the critical separation, there is
a minimum atmosphere mass the planets need to avoid
complete stripping. Any thinner atmosphere will be eas-
ily eroded. This mass is roughly 1% of the total mass and
corresponds to roughly an order unity modification to the
planet radius. So we expect to see a gap in planet size.
Such a gap may become less pronounced when different
core compositions are considered, but the basic property
that small atmospheres are unstable to complete evapo-
ration will always result in a region where planets are un-
likely to end up. Observationally determining the pres-
ence of such a gap will place strong constraints on the
model and further characterising the gap will allow useful
inferences about the dominant core mass/composition.
In Figure 9, we demonstrate that the radius distribu-
tion of KOI multi-planet systems is suggestive of a bi-
modal distribution. Most planets have sizes ∼ 1.5R⊕ or
2.5R⊕, with a deficit of objects at radius ∼ 2R⊕, indica-
tive of the presence of a gap. To further test this suspi-
cion, we divide the objects by their X-ray exposure into
a high X-ray group (corresponding to < 0.1 AU around
a solar-type star) and a low X-ray group. Strikingly, ob-
jects with a high X-ray exposure mostly have sizes below
the gap, at ∼ 1.5R⊕, while objects with a low X-ray ex-
posure typically have sizes above the gap, at ∼ 2.5R⊕.
This argues that the deficit at 2R⊕ could be physical and
is associated with X-ray exposure.
The same bi-modal behaviour appears when we con-
sider only KOI singles, both single and multi-planet
KOIs, or when we include only bright KOI targets, or
only dim KOI targets. In addition, the same behaviour
is seen when we restrict ourselves to planets that have
periods shorter than 50 days and sizes above 1.3R⊕, a
group of KOIs that suffer relatively little incompleteness
effect (Petigura et al. 2013; Fressin et al. 2013). Although
most careful studies to date have yet to have sufficient
radius resolution to confirm this feature (Howard et al.
2012; Petigura et al. 2013; Fressin et al. 2013), it is hinted
Fig. 9. -- The correlation between radii of KOI and their X-
ray exposures.
In the left panel, we show the radii of KOIs in
multi-planet systems (in open circles), and in KOI singles (dots),
versus their integrated X-ray exposure. The division between the
red and the green population corresponds to a distance of 0.1 AU
around a sun-like star. The black solid histogram in the right panel
is the size distribution of all KOI multi-planet systems (dashed
histogram for singles), while green that of the low X-ray group and
red the high X-ray group. The red and green objects have distinctly
different peak sizes, as is expected from our X-ray evaporation
models (Figure 8). While the green objects (with a peak size at
∼ 2.5R⊕) manage to hold on to some of the hydrogen envelopes
they were born with, most of the red objects have been stripped
down to naked cores (with a peak size at ∼ 1.5R⊕). The bimodal
size distribution of KOIs is naturally explained by their mass-loss
history (see text).
at by Morton & Swift (2013) who construct a probability
distribution function rather than using histograms with
large ranges. Currently evaporation is the only process
that can naturally explain such a bimodality. Any other
processes (planet gas accretion, migration, orbital insta-
bility, planetary mergers) may lead to a correlation be-
tween planet size and location, but will not produce two
separate peaks in radius.
The presence of this gap provides strong evidence that
evaporation not only sculpts the upper envelope of planet
sizes, it is also driving the evolution of the majority of
KOI objects. If all the planets in the higher X-ray expo-
sure peak originally had significant H/He envelopes com-
parable to the planets with lower X-ray exposures, then
∼ 50% of Kepler planet candidates having experienced
significant mass-loss during their lifetimes. Comparing
the gap location (0.1 AU around sun-like star) against
our theoretical calculations, we suggest that the planet
population in the current KOI list6 have predominately
low mass cores ∼ 6 M⊕, and that most started out their
lives with Hydrogen/Helium envelopes of at least a few
percent in mass. Certainly, the radius distribution of
close-in planets requires further work - along the lines of
Morton et al. (2013) - before definitive conclusions can
be drawn. As an accurately determined bi-modal distri-
bution encodes value information about the initial and
final planet mass and composition. Figure 8 illustrates
that the gap radius, as well as the separation at which
this gap appears, are direct probes of the core proper-
ties. An improved investigation on core composition and
6 The apparent absence of bare rocky planets at large separa-
tions deserves a comment. The current KOI list is incomplete for
this population (Howard et al. 2012; Fressin et al. 2013; Petigura
et al. 2013). As such, their presence is not yet understood.
10
Owen, J.E. & Wu, Y.
respective X-ray exposure, though since most host stars
are solar-type, this correction is typically small (< 10%).
The theoretically disallowed low-density region is shown.
Most of the observed densities avoid this forbidden re-
gion, providing strong evidence for sculpting by evapo-
ration.
Current density measurements (especially those using
transit-timing fittings) contain large uncertainties. This
prevents us from making more quantitative comparisons
at the moment. In particular, we could not discern the
density gap as predicted by model calculations.
The particular case of Kepler-36bc (Carter et al. 2012)
is worth commenting. The two planets have nearly iden-
tical separations (0.115 AU and 0.128 AU) but largely
discrepant densities, 6.8 & 0.86 g cm−3, respectively. At
their present orbits, the minimum core masses for the
two planets to retain their envelopes is ∼ 6.5 M⊕ (see
Figure 10). The measured masses of the two planets are
4.45 M⊕ and 8.08 M⊕, respectively, naturally explain-
ing the diversity in their structure. More systems like
Kepler-36 will be able to provide strong constraints on
the nature and strength of evaporation in close-in plan-
etary systems.
5. DISCUSSIONS
We discuss some of the caveats and limitations of
the presented calculations and how they bear on our
inferences about the observed planet population. The
two most important assumptions concern the use of a
two-layer planetary model (a rock core plus a Hydro-
gen/Helium envelope), and the adoption of the Owen &
Jackson (2012) evaporation model.
5.1. Variations in the planetary structure
Low-mass planets could contain volatile-rich atmo-
spheres, they could also contain a significant amount of
iron and/or ice in their cores, (Adams et al. 2008; Rogers
& Seager 2010). Our simple two-layer model of rocky
cores plus hydrogen envelope has been successful in ex-
plaining the observations. But what about these other
possibilities? Can we exclude them based on current ob-
servations?
We can exclude the possibility that the dominant
primordial atmospheres of these low-mass planets are
very rich in volatiles. Our arguments below run simi-
larly to those given in Wu & Lithwick (2013) but are
more informed by our detailed modelling and by the
physics of evaporation. If one considers a water-rich en-
velope, for instance, evaporation will not proceed as is
described here. First, water molecules have to be photo-
dissociated, then oxygen has to settle out to produce
a nearly pure hydrogen upper atmosphere (e.g. Kasting
& Pollack 1983).
If oxygen is present in the evapora-
tive flow at a high enough concentration, it will produce
strong cooling and increase the opacity to the X-rays.
This will severely suppress the gas temperature, leading
to a much lower evaporation rate, similar to what occurs
in a high metalicity protoplanetary discs (Ercolano &
Clarke 2010), but more extreme. Now suppose all these
conditions are satisfied and all hydrogen in the water
atmosphere is lost, this removes 1/8 of the atmosphere
mass. However, since the original water atmosphere has
a low scale height, such a removal can hardly change ei-
ther the bulk size or the bulk density of the planet. One
Fig. 10. -- Same as Figure 8 but showing final planet density.
Fig. 11. -- Observed planet density plotted against orbital separa-
tion, scaled to have the same X-ray exposure as around a sun-type
star. The planet sample includes both those from radial velocity
surveys (red filled circles, as compiled by Weiss et al. 2013) and
Kepler planets with masses confirmed by the Kepler team (com-
piled from Lissauer et al. 2011; Cochran et al. 2011; Gautier et al.
2012; Carter et al. 2012) or calculated from transit timing vari-
ations (TTV) by Wu & Lithwick (2013). There are large error
bars to many of the TTV masses. The shaded region is the disal-
lowed region as shown in Figure 10, and the dashed lines show the
densities of bare rocky cores for a range of masses.
mass should be conducted when planet radii are better
determined.
4.3. Comparison of Planet Density
While the KOI catalogue only allows comparison of
planet radius, the small but growing sample of low-mass
planets with measured masses also provides another im-
portant comparison: planet density.
In Figure 10, we
illustrate planet densities resulting from our integration.
In the density-separation plane, the upper envelope in
planet size is now translated into a lower envelope in
planet density. There is a gap in planet density, similar
to that in radius. However, if there is a planet popula-
tion with low mass cores (1 − 3M⊕), these low density
cores may partially fill in the gap.
To compare, in Figure 11 we plot the measured densi-
ties of a list of low masses planets against their scaled sep-
arations. We scale the actual planet separation by their
0.010.11110Seperation [AU]Density [g cm−3]0.010.110.1110Scaled Seperation [AU]Density [g cm−3]1 3 6 10 15 TTVRVKepler−11Kepler−18Kepler−20bcKepler−20efKepler−36 Planetary Evaporation
11
Fig. 12. -- The evaporation 'efficiency' (η) as a function of time.
Here, we trace the evolution of four 20 M⊕ planets, with core
masses of 7.5 (solid), 10 (dashed), 12.5 (dotted) & 15 (dot-dashed)
M⊕, at a separation of ∼0.03 AU from a sun-like star. All models
lose their entire envelopes towards the end.
would therefore not be able to explain the upper envelope
in the observed planet radius, or the bimodal planet size
distribution, or the correlation between planet density
and X-ray exposure in terms of planetary evaporation.
In contrast to atmosphere composition, we can be less
certain about the core composition. For planets with hy-
drogen envelopes that are more than a percent in mass,
the planet sizes are not sensitive to the core sizes (or
equivalently, core composition). Planets that have been
evaporated down to bare cores may be able to inform us
on the core composition, if the core masses are known. A
number of these objects show densities that are compat-
ible with rocky or iron/rock compositions (e.g., Hatzes
et al. 2011; Batalha et al. 2011). More detailed investi-
gations are necessary to ascertain the core compositions.
5.2. Improving the evaporation model
As we have discussed previously, evaporation is key to
the evolution of close in planets. Thus it is important to
assess the role the assumed evaporation model plays in
our conclusions. Most previous attempts to model the
evolution of evaporating planets use a constant evapora-
tion efficiency (η), which is typically taken to be ∼ 10%
(e.g., Lopez et al. 2012). We have argued that this effi-
ciency depends on planet mass and radius, as well as on
the X-ray flux. We further demonstrate this point here
by showing how the efficiency changes as a planet evolves
in Figure 12. Following four planets with the same initial
mass of 20M⊕ (but different core masses), we find that η
can decrease by a factor of 4 as the planets evolve from
the early puffy stage to the later denser stage, though the
variations are not strictly monotonic in time. The over-
all decrease can be understood: as the planet evolves
due to mass-loss and thermal contraction, the planet's
density and the surface escape velocities increases with
time. Therefore, it takes longer to accelerate the flow to
the escape velocity. This leads to enhanced cooling and
lower efficiencies. The non-uniform evolution of some of
the models at early times is due to planets straddling
the peak efficiency line (roughly when Tgas ∼ Tescape, see
Owen & Jackson 2012) during their evolution and mov-
ing above and below it at early times.
While the fixed efficiency of ∼ 10% adopted by, e.g.,
Jackson et al. (2012); Lopez et al. (2012) does represent
Fig. 13. -- The mass and radius evolution of a 20 M⊕ planet with
a 12.5 M⊕ core at a separation of ∼ 0.05 AU undergoing standard
Owen & Jackson (2012) evaporation (solid) -same as shown in Fig-
ure 3- and pure EUV evaporation (dashed). The thin solid line
represent the time at which the X-rays/EUV begin to decline.
the approximate median value during the evolution, it
can result in order unity inaccuracies in the integrated
mass-loss. So any inferences about the initial planet
structure should be taken with caution.
5.2.1. Accuracy of the X-ray model
The Owen & Jackson (2012) model for X-ray evapora-
tion contain a number of assumptions that may impact
our conclusions here. First, since only the soft < 1 − 2
keV photons are responsible for heating, while the X-ray
flux refers to the entire observed X-ray spectrum (0.1−10
KeV). If the adopted X-ray spectrum -while based on
observed spectra (see Owen et al. 2010)- is overly soft
or overly hard, then the X-ray heating will be over-
or under-estimated, respectively. Second, these calcu-
lations assumed that, in the X-ray region, molecules are
photo-dissociated or thermally dissociated by UV pho-
tons. Therefore, Owen & Jackson (2012) neglected cool-
ing associated with molecular species. This is an impor-
tant assumption which has not been vigorously tested. If
instead the molecular species provide significant cooling
(in the temperature range of 2000 − 5000K), the X-ray
driven flow will not reach T > 5000K and may remain
sub-sonic all the way out to the EUV ionization-front.
This will markedly reduce the mass-loss rate. More de-
tailed calculations are necessary to address this issue in
the future.
5.2.2. The role of EUV Evaporation
We find that EUV evaporation contributes < 10% of
the total mass-loss during the planet's evolution. The
EUV portion of the stellar flux, though comparable in
energy to that of the X-rays, are much less efficient at
driving a high integrated mass-loss. This is because in the
EUV flow region, the recombination of hydrogen and the
subsequent cooling bleeds much of the energy to space.
The radiation hydrodynamics is similar to that of a HII
region where ionization is balanced by recombination and
106107108109101000.050.10.150.2Time since disc clearing [years]'Efficienciy'51015202530Radius [R⊕]1061071081091010101214161820Time since disc clearing [years]Mass [M⊕] 12
Owen, J.E. & Wu, Y.
the temperature is controlled by the cooling thermostat
to ∼ 104 K (Murray-Clay et al. 2009).
We re-calculate the evolution of our 'standard' model
(see Section 3.3) undergoing EUV evaporation only, the
results of which are shown in Figure 13. At high EUV
fluxes ((cid:38) 104 erg s−1), the mass-loss scales as L1/2
EUV/a
(Murray-Clay et al. 2009; Owen & Jackson 2012) and is
significantly lower than the values that apply to X-ray
flow. This suppresses the mass-loss at early times by a
factor of ∼ 10, relative to the X-ray model. The inte-
grated mass-loss is ∼ 1 M⊕, as opposed to ∼ 7 M⊕ in
the X-ray model. As such, EUV evaporation alone is un-
able to sculpt the close-in planet population and cannot
explain the observed features discussed in Section 4.
6. CONCLUSIONS
In this work we have coupled the hydrodynamic evap-
oration models of Owen & Jackson (2012) to the stellar
evolution code mesa, in order to follow the mass and ra-
dius evolution of low mass planets orbiting close to their
stars. Evaporation, while having little effect on massive
planets, can remove the entire Hydrogen envelopes for
the hottest low-mass planets. In all cases we find that
X-rays is the dominant sculpting force, and that most of
the mass-loss occurs in the first few 100 Myrs when the
stars were more chromospherically active and while the
planets were still contracting thermally.
Our main conclusions are as follows:
1. Evaporation produces an upper envelope in planet
radius as a function of separation. The location
of this upper envelope depends on planet masses
and the X-ray luminosity of the host stars. In par-
ticular, M-dwarfs, having proportionally larger X-
ray fluxes, should have stronger evaporative power
than indicated by their low bolometric luminosities.
2. To closely reproduce the observed upper envelope
in Kepler candidates, both around sun-like stars
and around stars of other spectral types, we require
that the most massive hot Neptunes should have
total masses not much exceeding ∼ 20 M⊕, and
core masses roughly half of that.
3. Very close-in planets can be stripped of their entire
atmosphere. The boundary between complete loss
and planets that can retain at least ∼ 1% of their
atmosphere lies at ∼ 0.1 AU if the core masses are
∼ 6M⊕. At this distance (where most of the Kepler
planets lie), a thinner envelope can not survive. So
we expect a gap in planet size distribution -- and
this is suggestively seen in the Kepler catalogue,
where there is a deficit of planets at ∼ 2R⊕ strad-
dling planets with high X-ray exposures and those
with low X-ray exposures. Comparison with our
models suggests that most of the Kepler planets
should have core masses ∼ 6M⊕ and should have
primordial Hydrogen/Helium envelopes at least a
percent in mass. Moreover, about half of the Ke-
pler planets belong to the high X-ray group and
have been stripped down to naked cores.
4. Evaporation naturally explains the observed corre-
lation between planet density and separation. At
closer separations, planets in general have higher
densities.
5. Combining all evidences that support evaporaton,
we argue that Kepler planets were born with hydro-
gen envelopes, not volatile-rich atmospheres (also
see Wu & Lithwick 2013).
Looking ahead, we expect that the approach we
adopt here, coupling thermal evolution and evaporation,
will perhaps be the only hope we have for recovering
the initial structure of low-mass planets. With better
determined stellar radii and hence more accurate planet
radii, we may be able to retrieve the initial distribution
of planet total masses and core masses. With more
measurements of planet densities, it may be possible to
reconstruct the histories of individual planets (as is done
for Kepler-11 by Lopez et al. 2012). A larger sample of
planets with measured masses and radii will allow us to
place constraints on the core compositions, as well as
initial planet entropy.
It is at this point that we will
begin to learn valuable information about the planet
population at birth and make inferences about the
planet formation process (e.g Ida & Lin 2005; Mordasini
et al. 2012a,b; Hansen & Murray 2012, 2013).
We are grateful to the anonymous referee for comments
that helped improve the paper. We thank Norman Mur-
ray, Chris Thompson, Jason Rowe, Alan Jackson, Eric
Lopez, Adam Burrows and Yoram Lithwick for inter-
esting discussions. The calculations were performed on
the Sunnyvale cluster at CITA which is funded by the
Canada Foundation for Innovation. YW acknowledges
support by NSERC and the Province of Ontario.
REFERENCES
Adams, E. R., Seager, S., & Elkins-Tanton, L. 2008, ApJ, 673,
Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., Everett, M. E., & Esquerdo, G. A.
1160, 1160
2011, AJ, 142, 112, 112
Armitage, P. J. 2011, ARA&A, 49, 195, 195
Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., & Barman, T. 2008, A&A, 482, 315, 315
Baraffe, I., Selsis, F., Chabrier, G., et al. 2004, A&A, 419, L13,
Carter, J. A., Agol, E., Chaplin, W. J., et al. 2012, ArXiv
e-prints, arXiv:1206.4718
Ciardi, D. R., Fabrycky, D. C., Ford, E. B., et al. 2013, ApJ, 763,
L13
41, 41
Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2011, ApJ,
Cochran, W. D., Fabrycky, D. C., Torres, G., et al. 2011, ApJS,
729, 27, 27
Batalha, N. M., Rowe, J. F., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2013, ApJS,
204, 24, 24
Bertoldi, F., & McKee, C. F. 1990, ApJ, 354, 529, 529
Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Basri, G., et al. 2011, ApJ, 736, 19,
19
197, 7, 7
Davis, T. A., & Wheatley, P. J. 2009, MNRAS, 396, 1012, 1012
Ercolano, B., & Clarke, C. J. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 2735, 2735
Erkaev, N. V., Kulikov, Y. N., Lammer, H., et al. 2007, A&A,
472, 329, 329
Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., & Barnes, J. W. 2007a, ApJ, 668,
1267, 1267
Planetary Evaporation
13
-- . 2007b, ApJ, 659, 1661, 1661
Fortney, J. J., & Nettelmann, N. 2010, Space Sci. Rev., 152, 423,
Lopez, E. D., Fortney, J. J., & Miller, N. 2012, ApJ, 761, 59, 59
Mann, A. W., Gaidos, E., L´epine, S., & Hilton, E. J. 2012, ApJ,
423
753, 90, 90
Fressin, F., Torres, G., Charbonneau, D., et al. 2013, ApJ, 766,
Mordasini, C., Alibert, Y., Georgy, C., et al. 2012a, A&A, 547,
81, 81
A112, A112
Gautier, III, T. N., Charbonneau, D., Rowe, J. F., et al. 2012,
Mordasini, C., Alibert, Y., Klahr, H., & Henning, T. 2012b,
ApJ, 749, 15, 15
A&A, 547, A111, A111
Gudel, M. 2004, A&A Rev., 12, 71, 71
Gudel, M., Briggs, K. R., Arzner, K., et al. 2007, A&A, 468, 353,
Morton, T. D., & Johnson, J. A. 2011, ApJ, 738, 170, 170
Morton, T. D., & Swift, J. J. 2013, ArXiv e-prints,
353
Guillot, T. 2010, A&A, 520, A27, A27
Haisch, Jr., K. E., Lada, E. A., & Lada, C. J. 2001, ApJ, 553,
L153, L153
Hansen, B., & Murray, N. 2013, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1301.7431
Hansen, B. M. S., & Murray, N. 2012, ApJ, 751, 158, 158
Hatzes, A. P., Fridlund, M., Nachmani, G., et al. 2011, ApJ, 743,
75, 75
arXiv:1303.3013
Muirhead, P. S., Hamren, K., Schlawin, E., et al. 2012, ApJ, 750,
L37, L37
Murray-Clay, R. A., Chiang, E. I., & Murray, N. 2009, ApJ, 693,
23, 23
Nettelmann, N., Fortney, J. J., Kramm, U., & Redmer, R. 2011,
ApJ, 733, 2, 2
Owen, J. E., Ercolano, B., & Clarke, C. J. 2011, MNRAS, 412,
Hern´andez, J., Hartmann, L., Megeath, T., et al. 2007, ApJ, 662,
13, 13
1067, 1067
Owen, J. E., Ercolano, B., Clarke, C. J., & Alexander, R. D.
Hollenbach, D. J., Yorke, H. W., & Johnstone, D. 2000,
2010, MNRAS, 401, 1415, 1415
Protostars and Planets IV, 401, 401
Howard, A. W., Marcy, G. W., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2012, ApJS,
201, 15, 15
Owen, J. E., & Jackson, A. P. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 2931, 2931
Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 3, 3
Paxton, B., Cantiello, M., Arras, P., et al. 2013, ArXiv e-prints,
Hubbard, W. B., Fortney, J. J., Lunine, J. I., et al. 2001, ApJ,
arXiv:1301.0319
560, 413, 413
Perez-Becker, D., & Chiang, E. 2013, ArXiv e-prints,
Hubbard, W. B., Hattori, M. F., Burrows, A., & Hubeny, I.
arXiv:1302.2147
2007a, ApJ, 658, L59, L59
Petigura, E. A., Marcy, G. W., & Howard, A. W. 2013, ArXiv
Hubbard, W. B., Hattori, M. F., Burrows, A., Hubeny, I., &
e-prints, arXiv:1304.0460
Sudarsky, D. 2007b, ??jnlIcarus, 187, 358, 358
Ida, S., & Lin, D. N. C. 2005, ApJ, 626, 1045, 1045
Jackson, A. P., Davis, T. A., & Wheatley, P. J. 2012, MNRAS,
422, 2024, 2024
Johnstone, D., Hollenbach, D., & Bally, J. 1998, ApJ, 499, 758,
758
Kasting, J. F., & Pollack, J. B. 1983, ??jnlIcarus, 53, 479, 479
Koskinen, T. T., Aylward, A. D., & Miller, S. 2007, Nature, 450,
845, 845
Koskinen, T. T., Cho, J. Y.-K., Achilleos, N., & Aylward, A. D.
2010, ApJ, 722, 178, 178
Lammer, H., Erkaev, N. V., Odert, P., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 664,
664
Lammer, H., Selsis, F., Ribas, I., et al. 2003, ApJ, 598, L121, L121
Lecavelier des Etangs, A. 2007, A&A, 461, 1185, 1185
Lissauer, J. J., Ragozzine, D., Fabrycky, D. C., et al. 2011, ApJS,
197, 8, 8
Lissauer, J. J., Marcy, G. W., Rowe, J. F., et al. 2012, ApJ, 750,
112, 112
Ribas, I., Guinan, E. F., Gudel, M., & Audard, M. 2005, ApJ,
622, 680, 680
Rogers, L. A., & Seager, S. 2010, ApJ, 712, 974, 974
Tian, F., Toon, O. B., Pavlov, A. A., & De Sterck, H. 2005, ApJ,
621, 1049, 1049
Vidal-Madjar, A., Lecavelier des Etangs, A., D´esert, J., et al.
2003, Nature, 422, 143, 143
Vidal-Madjar, A., D´esert, J.-M., Lecavelier des Etangs, A., et al.
2004, ApJ, 604, L69, L69
Watson, A. J., Donahue, T. M., & Walker, J. C. G. 1981, Icarus,
48, 150, 150
Weiss et al. 2013, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1303.2150
Wu, Y., & Lithwick, Y. 2013, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1210.7810
Yelle, R. V. 2004, Icarus, 170, 167, 167
|
0903.5308 | 3 | 0903 | 2010-02-24T18:25:02 | Dynamical inference from a kinematic snapshot: The force law in the Solar System | [
"astro-ph.EP",
"astro-ph.GA",
"gr-qc",
"physics.class-ph",
"physics.data-an"
] | If a dynamical system is long-lived and non-resonant (that is, if there is a set of tracers that have evolved independently through many orbital times), and if the system is observed at any non-special time, it is possible to infer the dynamical properties of the system (such as the gravitational force or acceleration law) from a snapshot of the positions and velocities of the tracer population at a single moment in time. In this paper we describe a general inference technique that solves this problem while allowing (1) the unknown distribution function of the tracer population to be simultaneously inferred and marginalized over, and (2) prior information about the gravitational field and distribution function to be taken into account. As an example, we consider the simplest problem of this kind: We infer the force law in the Solar System using only an instantaneous kinematic snapshot (valid at 2009 April 1.0) for the eight major planets. We consider purely radial acceleration laws of the form a_r = -A [r/r_0]^{-\alpha}, where r is the distance from the Sun. Using a probabilistic inference technique, we infer 1.989 < \alpha < 2.052 (95 percent interval), largely independent of any assumptions about the distribution of energies and eccentricities in the system beyond the assumption that the system is phase-mixed. Generalizations of the methods used here will permit, among other things, inference of Milky Way dynamics from Gaia-like observations. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | Dynamical inference from a kinematic snapshot:
The force law in the Solar System
Jo Bovya,b, Iain Murrayc, David W. Hogga,d
ABSTRACT
If a dynamical system is long-lived and non-resonant (that is, if there is a set of
tracers that have evolved independently through many orbital times), and if the
system is observed at any non-special time, it is possible to infer the dynamical
properties of the system (such as the gravitational force or acceleration law)
from a snapshot of the positions and velocities of the tracer population at a
single moment in time. In this paper we describe a general inference technique
that solves this problem while allowing (1) the unknown distribution function of
the tracer population to be simultaneously inferred and marginalized over, and
(2) prior information about the gravitational field and distribution function to
be taken into account. As an example, we consider the simplest problem of this
kind: We infer the force law in the Solar System using only an instantaneous
kinematic snapshot (valid at 2009 April 1.0) for the eight major planets. We
consider purely radial acceleration laws of the form ar = −A [r/r0]−α, where r
is the distance from the Sun. Using a probabilistic inference technique, we infer
1.989 < α < 2.052 (95 percent interval), largely independent of any assumptions
about the distribution of energies and eccentricities in the system beyond the
assumption that the system is phase-mixed. Generalizations of the methods
used here will permit, among other things, inference of Milky Way dynamics
from Gaia-like observations.
Subject headings: celestial mechanics -- ephemerides -- gravitation -- methods:
statistical -- Solar System: general
0
1
0
2
b
e
F
4
2
.
]
P
E
h
p
-
o
r
t
s
a
[
3
v
8
0
3
5
.
3
0
9
0
:
v
i
X
r
a
a Center for Cosmology and Particle Physics, Department of Physics, New York University, 4 Washington
Place, New York, NY 10003, USA
b Correspondence should be addressed to [email protected] .
c Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G4, Canada
d Max-Planck-Institut fur Astronomie, Konigstuhl 17, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany
-- 2 --
1.
Introduction
The Gaia Satellite (Perryman et al. 2001) will measure positions and velocities for mil-
lions to billions of stars at varying precision. One of the principal goals of this mission is to
provide the data necessary to infer the dynamical state of the Milky Way. However, there
are issues in principle with inference of dynamics from a snapshot or instantaneous set of
configuration and velocity measurements: The instantaneous positions and velocities have
no necessary relationship with the gravitational potential or accelerations. Indeed, despite
a considerable literature (for example, Oort 1932; Schwarzschild 1979; Little & Tremaine
1987; Kaasalainen & Binney 1994; Johnston et al. 1999; Beloborodov & Levin 2004) there
is no methodology for performing this inference that naturally handles all of the issues, in-
cluding finite and non-trivial observational uncertainties or noise, missing data, non-steady
aspects of the mass distribution, and the (incredibly likely) possibility that the potential is
not (simply) integrable. Robust inference may not even be possible if the Milky Way has sig-
nificant time-dependence or is strongly chaotic or is far from showing any simple symmetries
(such as axisymmetry).
Certainly there is no hope for dynamical inference on the massive scale required for the
Gaia data set if we cannot perform it on much simpler, much more symmetrical, much older
(in a dynamical sense), and much smaller (in a data sense) systems. In what follows, we
take one of the simplest possible systems -- the Solar System -- and the smallest possible data
set -- the positions and velocities of the major planets at a moment in time -- and perform
a complete dynamical inference. For a test system we could also have chosen the black
hole at the Galactic Center, where similar considerations apply. However, this system has
additional issues with "missing data" because not all six phase-space coordinates are directly
measurable for all stars. The Solar System truly is the simplest problem in this class.
Our inferential starting point is orbital roulette (Beloborodov & Levin 2004). In this
previous work, it was assumed that the orbital angles (in the action -- angle formalism) are
uniformly distributed. Thus, dynamical model parameters that correspond to orbital angles
that suspiciously lack diversity are rejected. More specifically, the method considers a large
range of possible dynamical model parameters, computes orbital angles at every value of the
parameters, and a distribution statistic on those orbital angles. If the distribution statistic
is designed to monotonically increase with the diversity of the angles or the flatness of the
angle distribution, the "best fit" dynamical model parameters are those that optimize the
distribution statistic. This kind of approach is inherently frequentist: on many applications
of these procedures to independent datasets a confidence interval captures the true dynamical
parameters on a guaranteed fraction of trials. However, for any given dataset the confidence
interval produced might not represent a credible set of parameters.
-- 3 --
In what follows we cast the dynamical parameters estimation as a probabilistic infer-
ence problem (a "Bayesian" approach). We adopt the same core assumption as the roulette
problem: we assume that the orbital angles are uniformly distributed. However, in this
framework, we must also construct prior probability distribution functions for the dynami-
cal model parameters and conditional probabilities of the data given the model to encode the
assumptions of a long-lived and bound Solar System. These prior and conditional probabil-
ity distributions and the data create posterior probability distribution functions for all the
parameters. We use this new method to infer the gravitational force law (radial dependence
and amplitude). What is new here, in the context of Solar System dynamics, is that we
perform this inference with only a snapshot of the kinematic state, that is, with only the
positions and velocities of the planets at a single instant of time.
Of course the kinematic snapshot we employ is, in fact, a set of initial conditions for
a Solar System integration (Giorgini et al. 1996). These initial conditions were determined
not by a single measurement at a single epoch, but are in fact the result of an optimization
of a Solar System integration to observed planetary positions over many decades.
In the
context of this paper -- a demonstration of a method -- it is best to think of these "data" as
"simulated data" useful for testing the method. They just happen to be data that have been
simulated by the analog computer we know as the Solar System.
What is new here, in the context of dynamical inference, is that our method is fully
probabilistic or Bayesian. This is important for future problems, such as the Gaia problem,
or for inferring the mass of the black hole at the center of the Milky Way, because in these
real data analysis problems, the data points come with non-trivial and highly correlated
observational uncertainties, and because entire dimensions of phase space are missing or un-
observed. At the Galactic Center, we do not know the radial distance to anything accurately,
and in the Gaia data set many of the radial velocities will not be measured. The Bayesian
framework handles these real-world data issues very naturally, although in fact they are not
important in the test problem we solve here. Aside from these issues of principle, it is also
the case, as we will show, that the Bayesian method performs extremely well.
Of course, a lot is known about the gravitational force law in the Solar System, so we
do not expect, at the outset, to be surprised by our results. The first force-law inference in
the Solar System (Newton 1687, and also work by contemporaries, particularly Hooke, who
may have priority) made use of full orbit shape determination (Kepler 1609). In this sense,
Newton's problem -- find the force law (from among a small, discrete group of possible force
laws) that leads to elliptical orbits with the Sun at one focus -- was much easier than the
problem we have set for ourselves. Of course, along the way, Newton had to develop for the
first time the general principles of kinematics and dynamics!
-- 4 --
2. Parameterized force law or dynamical model
We are going to assume spherical symmetry of the Solar System's force law and gravita-
tional potential, although nothing in the general inference formalism that follows will require
this. Consider a radial force law (really acceleration law) of the form
~a = −A (cid:20) r
r0(cid:21)−α
r ,
(1)
where A is an amplitude, r is the distance from the Sun, r0 is a distance scale (in this case
we will use r0 = 1 AU so that A can be thought of as the acceleration at Earth's orbit), α
parameterizes the radial dependence, and r is the radial direction. In this model, the list of
free parameters is
where we have taken the logarithm of A because in inference problems, dimensioned param-
eters are usually best handled in the log (Jeffreys 1939; Sivia & Skilling 2006).
ω ≡ {ln A, α} ,
(2)
The potential u (potential energy per unit planet mass), radial effective potential ueff,
and binding energy per unit mass ǫ ≡ −E/m are
1 − α (cid:20) r
u(r) =
A r0
r0(cid:21)1−α
ueff(r) = u(r) +
j2
2 r2
ǫ = −ueff −
1
2
v2
r
,
,
,
(3)
(4)
(5)
where j2 is the square of the magnitude of the planet's angular momentum per unit mass
(or L2/m2), and vr is the radial component of the velocity (the component of ~v parallel to
~x). The perihelion and aphelion distances rperi and rap are both found by setting ǫ = −ueff.
With these, we can define a radial asymmetry e as
rap − rperi
rap + rperi
e ≡
(6)
,
where we have called this "e" because in the Kepler -- Newton α = 2 case it is the orbital
eccentricity. One way of thinking of this radial asymmetry is that at any point in the space
made up of the dynamical parameters ω and the binding energy ǫ, the radial asymmetry e
is a dimensionless description of the angular momentum magnitude.
Importantly for what follows, we can define a "radial angle" φr that increases linearly
with time from perihelion passage through next perihelion passage. Any planet at radius
r on an orbit with perihelion distance rperi and aphelion distance rap can be assigned this
angle φr by
φr ≡
π + π
for vr > 0
for vr < 0
,
(7)
-- 5 --
π
t(r) − t(rperi)
t(rap) − t(rperi)
t(r) − t(rap)
t(rperi) − t(rap)
where the first numerator is the time it takes to go from rperi to r outbound, the first
denominator is the time it takes to go from rperi to rap outbound, the second numerator
and denominator are the times inbound, and all time differences between two radii can be
computed numerically for general values of α by integrating the inverse of the radial velocity
between these radii. The first-order form of this integral has an integrable singularity at the
perihelion and aphelion, which can be handled by an appropriate change of variables (e.g.,
Press et al. 2007). A planet observed at a set of random times spanning many orbits will be
observed to have radial angles φr drawn from a flat distribution in the range 0 < φr < 2 π.
This radial angle is one of the angles in the action -- angle formulation of the system, which
is integrable for the simple reason that it is spherically symmetric.
3. Kinematic data
In what follows, we are going to use and compare several methods for inferring the
force-law parameters ω (the amplitude ln A and radial exponent α of the spherical force law)
from an instantaneous snapshot of the positions and velocities of the eight major planets.
This snapshot was taken from JPL's HORIZONS System which provides highly accurate
ephemerides for Solar System objects1 (Giorgini et al. 1996). It is an extrapolation (at the
time of writing) to 2009 April 1.0, approximately 400 years after the important publication
of Kepler (1609). This kinematic snapshot is given in Table 1.
Since this snapshot is obtained by integrating the positions and velocities of Solar System
bodies, the accuracy is limited by (i) the correctness of the dynamical model used, (ii) the
numerical integration of the equations of motion, and (iii) the accuracy to which the initial
conditions are known. It is generally believed that the dynamical model used is correct and
complete, and that the numerical integration is sufficiently accurate. The main uncertainty
in the ephemerides is then that due to the uncertainty in the initial conditions. The current
set of initial conditions (DE405; Standish 1998) is a fit to a set of optical, radar, and VLBI
observations as well as to a set of spacecraft range and Doppler points from various space
1Available at http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?horizons
-- 6 --
missions. The uncertainties are the largest for the outer planets, since the data for these
are almost entirely from optical observations (with the exception of Jupiter), and because
Neptune has not been observed over a full orbit since the start of precise measurements. A
comparison between the DE405 ephemerides and more recent observations shows that the
positions of the inner planets are known to a fractional accuracy of approximately 10−8,
while those of the outer planets are known to a fractional accuracy of 10−6 to 10−7 (Standish
2004). Uncertainties in the velocities are at the same fractional magnitude.
This kinematic snapshot is not, of course, a fair data set with which to perform the
inference below, for the main reason that the "measured" kinematic state of the Solar System
is in fact the output of fitting observations with a dynamical model that assumes α = 2. For
this reason, the data should be thought of as "idealized" or "simulated data" and the work
must be considered a test of the method rather than a definitive inference.
4. Bound, virialized, and long-lived
The virial theorem relates the time averages hTi and hUi of a test particle's kinetic and
potential energies through
hTi =
1 − α
2
hUi
,
(8)
where α is the exponent in the radial force law. Given that a planet's potential energy is a
function of the dynamical parameters ω, while its kinetic energy is not, the virial relation
for each planet becomes a one-dimensional locus in the ω space. Using kinetic and potential
energies computed from the observations as a proxy for the time-averaged energies, these
loci are shown in Figures 1 and 2. The fact that all eight lines cross near a single point in
the space is encouraging that the system is virialized (as we expect) and that the inference
will work. That the eight lines so nearly intersect in a single point is because, in fact, many
of the planets are on circular orbits; the probabilistic method developed in this paper does
not assume this, but it does retain the precision that is possible because of this situation.
Also shown in Figures 1 and 2 is the region of parameter space in which one or more
of the planets is unbound because T > U or, equivalently, ǫ < 0. In what follows, we will
assign vanishing probability to regions of parameter space in which one or more planets is
unbound. However, as we will see, this does not affect any of our conclusions. Also shown in
Figure 1 is the region of parameter space in which one or more of the planets has rperi < R⊙,
where R⊙ is the radius of the Sun. This part of parameter space ought also to be excluded,
although in practice this is not necessary for any of what follows.
In preparation for what follows, we pre-compute all of the planet radial angles φr,i --
-- 7 --
given their positions ~xi and velocities ~vi -- as a function of the dynamical parameters. These
angles are shown in Figure 3.
5. Frequentist orbital roulette
In orbital roulette (Beloborodov & Levin 2004), the idea is to compute, for each point
ω in parameter space, the N radial angles φr,i and analyze them statistically for being well
mixed.
In practice, this means applying a distribution test or multiple distribution tests
to the angles and preferring parameters for which these tests are more consistent with a
random or flat distribution of angles in the range 0 < φr < 2 π. Because each test provides
one constraint, and in the case described here the parameter space is two-dimensional, at
least two qualitatively different tests are required to make localized constraints in ω.
In
addition to a test for a flat angle distribution we also apply a test for an angle -- energy
correlation.
About the simplest consistency test for the calculated angles is a test of the mean of the
angles: Is the mean consistent with the expected mean for a uniformly distributed set of N
planets? For this to perform well one must fold the angles of the inbound planets onto the
interval [0, π], that is, disregard the information in the sign of the radial velocity; then the
expected mean of the angles is equal to π/2 (for details on how to test this assumption, see
Beloborodov & Levin 2004). The fact that we have to perform this mapping indicates that
the procedure is ad hoc. Indeed, for a uniform distribution on the circle there is no specific
meaning to the perihelion and the aphelion, or to any two points, such that no real meaning
can be attached to the mean of the angles between two arbitrary points on the circle.
Better, one can test the consistency of the full distribution function of the angles with a
uniform distribution. This could again be done with the full [0, 2π] distributed angles or with
the folded angles; the results will depend on this choice. Testing an observed distribution
for consistency with an expected distribution often involves comparing cumulative distribu-
tion functions (Kolmogorov 1941). The Kolmogorov -- Smirnov (K -- S) test is the simplest in
practice, since the distribution of the test statistic -- the maximum difference between the
cumulative distributions -- can be approximated by an analytic function (Stephens 1970).
The K -- S test is by construction most sensitive to deviations near the median value; this
rules out dynamical parameters at which the planets bunch up at perihelion or at aphelion,
the situation in which about half are at perihelion and half at aphelion can easily dupe the
test.
A statistic can be chosen that is sensitive to deviations at all values, such as the
-- 8 --
Anderson -- Darling statistic (Anderson & Darling 1952). However, no approximate analytic
description of the distribution of this statistic exists and in practice this distribution has to
be obtained by Monte Carlo sampling (e.g., Beloborodov & Levin 2004). A statistic more
appropriate to the problem at hand (although we are not primarily interested in a careful
examination of the differences between different frequentist procedures) is Kuiper's statistic
(Kuiper 1962). This statistic -- the sum of the maximum distance of the observed cumula-
tive distribution above and below the expected cumulative distribution -- is invariant under
periodic shifts of the angle and was specifically designed to test uniform distributions on
the circle. The advantage over Anderson -- Darling is that the asymptotic distribution of the
Kuiper statistic is known (e.g., Press et al. 2007).
All of these tests for the uniformity of the distribution of the angles are shown in
Figure 4. These tests can fail when for a certain combination of dynamical parameters some
planets are near aphelion while other planets are near perihelion. This situation appears
here in Figure 3, at α far from 2, where there are large regions in which the inner planets,
especially Mercury and Venus, are near perihelion, while the outer planets, especially Uranus
and Neptune, are near aphelion and vice versa. This prevents the mean angle and K -- S tests
from excluding those regions. The Kuiper test performs better.
A second constraint (for the two-dimensional parameter space) comes from a second
test. In regions of parameter space in which the inner planets are all near perihelion and
the outer planets are all near aphelion, a significant correlation between the angles and the
energies exists. This correlation is unphysical if the system is not being observed at any
special time. A non-parametric test for the correlation is preferred here as the angle -- energy
correlation will not in general be linear. We perform a test of the angle -- energy correlation
using Kendall's τ (Kendall 1938). This is a rank test; it only considers the relative ordering
of the angles and energies of different planets (for details on this test see Press et al. 2007).
That this test is in a sense orthogonal to the tests of the uniformity of the angle distribution
can be seen in Figure 4.
All of the frequentist tests permit acceptance or rejection of a dynamical model at a
certain confidence level. 95 and 99 percent confidence intervals for all of the frequentist tests
are shown in Figure 4. Also shown is the combination of the tests of the uniformity of the
angle distribution with the test of the angle -- energy correlation.
-- 9 --
6. Probabilistic dynamical inference
The frequentist procedures perform reasonably well in this simple problem because the
number of dynamical parameters is small and the data have vanishing errors and no missing
components. As the number of dynamical parameters increases the frequentist must find
larger numbers of tests in order to break degeneracies. While data uncertainties can be
included by sampling the error distribution of the data and combining the results (e.g.,
Beloborodov & Levin 2004), this will perform badly in the limit of low signal-to-noise or
missing data. These difficulties are related to the fact that these procedures use only a very
crude model of the data, that is, that the angles are distributed uniformly and that angle --
energy correlations should be absent, which allows no room for discovery of structure in phase
space. A fully Bayesian treatment of this problem can treat the phase-space distribution
function as an unknown function to be inferred from the data. Modeling the full phase-
space distribution function permits simultaneous inference of missing data and properly
marginalized probability distributions for dynamical parameters.
Imagine that we have the three-vector positions ~xi and three-vector velocities ~vi at some
time t for N planets i and a parameterized model for the gravitational acceleration law (force
law per unit mass) ~aω(~x), a function of position ~x and a list of parameters ω. We wish to
obtain an estimate of the posterior probability distribution p(ω{~xi, ~vi}) for the parameters,
where {~xi, ~vi} is the set of all planet positions and velocities. We employ Bayes's theorem
as follows:
p(ω{~xi, ~vi}) =
,
(9)
p({~xi, ~vi}ω) p(ω)
p({~xi, ~vi})
where, as usual, p({~xi, ~vi}ω) is the likelihood or the probability distribution function for
the data given the model parameters, evaluated at the observed values of the data, p(ω) is
the prior probability distribution function for the parameters, and the denominator is (for
our purposes here) a normalization constant.
For our chosen parameterization of the dynamical parameters, ω, a broad flat or uniform
prior in the space represents a reasonable description of our (assumed) prior knowledge. The
much more challenging problem is to specify the likelihood of the dynamical parameters, the
conditional probability distribution function p({~xi, ~vi}ω). Without detailed knowledge of
how the Solar System formed, this probability distribution is also a representation of our
prior beliefs. Ideally our ability to learn from the observed data will not be too sensitive to
these beliefs.
It is easier to express beliefs about the angle φr, radial asymmetry e, and binding
energy ǫ of each planet than its position and velocity. This is because, given our assump-
tion that the planets constitute an angle-mixed population, Jeans's theorem (Jeans 1915;
-- 10 --
Binney & Tremaine 2008) tells us that the distribution function, which is proportional to
the probability of observing a planet at a certain locus in phase space, is only a function of
the integrals of the motion. We wish to assign zero probability to dynamical parameters that
lead to any of the computed binding energies ǫ(~xi, ~vi, ω) being negative (because we defined
ǫ > 0 to be bound). We would also like to express our prior information or assumption that
the system is long-lived (in units of the dynamical time), that it is non-resonant, and that we
are not seeing the system at any special time, or that the radial angles φr will be randomly
distributed between 0 and 2 π. In the absence of any better information, we will try to be as
agnostic as possible about the actions (conserved quantities) of the planets but extremely
confident that all radial angles 0 < φr < 2 π are equally likely.
In the simple spherical or radial situation under consideration here, in which there are
no missing data, we can rewrite the likelihood as a function of the planets' radial coordinates,
as the orientation of the orbit does not depend on the dynamical parameters:
p(~x, ~vω) ∝ p(r, vr, j2ω) = J(ln ǫ, e, φr; r, vr, j2) p(ln ǫ, e, φrω)
(10)
.
where, again, we have gone to ln ǫ because dimensioned parameters are usually best handled
in the log, and J(ln ǫ, e, φr; r, vr, j2) is the Jacobian matrix of all the partial derivatives of
(ln ǫ, e, φr) with respect to (r, vr, j2). For spherical potentials, this Jacobian is given by
J(ln ǫ, e, φr; r, vr, j2) =
2 π
Tr
,
(11)
1
ǫ (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)
∂e
∂j2(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)
where the derivative is evaluated at the current location in phase space and Tr is the radial
period, which depends on the dynamical parameters and the integrals of the motion. For
general α this radial period can be computed numerically (see § 2). The derivative of the
radial asymmetry with respect to the specific angular momentum squared can be written in
terms of the perihelion and aphelion distance as
∂e
∂j2 = Arα
0 rap rperi
(rap + rperi)2 "j2 − Ar3
ap − r3−α
r3−α
peri
r0 (cid:19)3−α#−1"j2 − Ar3
0(cid:18)rap
0(cid:18)rperi
r0 (cid:19)3−α#−1
In the special case α = 2 this Jacobian is
where we have dropped any terms that do not depend on the mass of the Sun.
J(ln ǫ, e, φr; r, vr, j2) ∝ ǫ3/2 e−1 M −3
⊙
.
(12)
(13)
As well as assuming that the angles are independently and uniformly distributed, we
might further assume that the energy and radial asymmetry of each planet were drawn
independently:
p({ln ǫi, ei, φr,i}ω) =
1
(2π)N
N
Yi=1
p(ei, ln ǫiω)
.
(14)
-- 11 --
However, a priori we do not know the distribution function from which radial asymmetries
and binding energies were drawn. Fixing p(ei, ln ǫiω) to a broad distribution would be mak-
ing a strong assumption: regardless of what the data say we would continue to dogmatically
believe that the distribution function was broad, which could result in poor inferences about
the model as a whole.
We can assume that the planets' properties were drawn independently and identically
distributed, without making strong assumptions about what that distribution was. This is
achieved by introducing auxiliary parameters θ = {θe, θǫ} that if known would specify the
distribution function. Since we do not know these nuisance parameters, introducing a prior
p(θω) and marginalizing over them,
p({ln ǫi, ei, φr,i}ω) =
1
(2π)N Z dθ p(θω)
N
Yi=1
p(ei, ln ǫiθ, ω)
,
(15)
is then part of the inference task. With all of this in place, we apply equation (9) to get the
posterior distribution over the dynamical parameters
p(ω{~xi, ~vi}) ∝" N
Yi=1
J(ln ǫi, ei, φr,i; ri, vr,i, j2
i )# Z dθ p(θ, ω)
N
Yi=1
p(ei, ln ǫiθ, ω)
,
(16)
where each planet's value of (ln ǫi, ei, φr,i) is a function of phase-space position (~xi, ~vi) and
dynamical parameters ω, and the Jacobian is evaluated at each planet's value of (ln ǫi, ei, φr,i).
For situations in which we have missing data or noisy observations, further unknown
quantities will be added to the model and marginalized over. As the model becomes more
complicated it is more likely that Markov chain Monte Carlo (e.g., Neal 1993) or other
approximate computational methods will be required.
6.1. Basic method
To keep things as simple as possible, at first we model the distribution function
p(ln ǫ, eω, θ) as a product of a top-hat function in ln ǫ from ln ǫa to ln ǫb with a top-hat
function in e from ea to eb. In this context, the phase-space parameter list is
θ = {ln ǫa, ln ǫb, ea, eb} .
(17)
In what follows, we only consider values A < ln ǫa < ln ǫb < B, where A and B provide very
distant (uninformative) limits (below, we will take the limit), and 0 ≤ ea ≤ eb ≤ 1. These
enforce our assumption or prior information that the system is bound.
-- 12 --
For our initial model we also set the prior p(θ, ω) flat or uniform in all the parameters.
Now the marginalization required to compute the posterior (equation 16), an integral over
all four of the phase-space distribution parameters in θ, can be performed analytically; it
leaves
p(ω{~xi, ~vi}) ∝ [ln ǫK − ln ǫL]2−N(cid:2)1 − [1 − eL]2−N − [eM ]2−N + [eM − eL]2−N(cid:3)
N
(18)
J(ln ǫ, e, φr; ri, vr,i, j2
i )
,
×
Yi=1
where ln ǫL is the lowest planetary binding energy at this point ω in dynamical parameter
space, ln ǫK is the highest, eL is the lowest planetary radial asymmetry at this point ω, eM is
the highest, and we have taken the limit in which the range of the parameters (ln ǫa, ln ǫb) goes
to infinity, or A → −∞, B → ∞. This posterior probability distribution for ω represents
our posterior beliefs marginalized over all possible values of {ln ǫa, ln ǫb, ea, eb} of the tophat
model.
6.2. Alternative methods
The results of any inference depend both on the data and on modeling assumptions.
Thus, it is always sensible to question any assumptions and investigate how sensitive the
results are to them.
The marginalization in our basic method is tractable at the expense of believability: it
seems unlikely that the true distribution function over the planet properties is uniform in
the chosen parameterization. If the true distribution function is far from this assumption,
the inference performed here could be in trouble because the zero prior probability assigned
to all other reasonable forms of the distribution function makes it impossible for the model
to learn this. This family of distribution functions also has no special status: a distribution
which is uniform in one parameterization will not be uniform in another. Instead of modeling
the distribution in (ln ǫ, e, φr), we could have chosen to model the distribution function in
terms of (ln ǫ, e2, φr). This set of parameters is, in a sense, more natural as it is closer to
action -- angle coordinates, and, thus, the Jacobian J(ln ǫ, e2, φr; r, vr, j2) is more close to
constant. Indeed, from equation (13) it is clear that, in the case of α = 2, this Jacobian does
not depend on the eccentricity of the orbit any longer and Figure 8 shows that this Jacobian
is close to constant for all values of ln A and α. However, it is not obvious a priori whether
using this parameterization will give better results. Rather than guessing, we can assume
that the distribution over radial asymmetries is uniform in an unknown parameterization,
and infer from the data what this parameterization should be. We tried assuming that the
-- 13 --
radial asymmetry was uniform over some range of e, e2 or √e, with equal prior probability
over each choice. This method corresponds to extending θ to parameterize a richer class
of distributions. As we did with nuisance parameters before, we can marginalize over this
choice.
In general we could marginalize over a very flexible class of distributions for both the
binding energy and radial asymmetry. A generic way of representing distributions is with
a histogram, where any distribution can be represented within an arbitrary tolerance for
sufficiently narrow bins. Some care is required in putting a prior p(θ) over the heights of the
bins. It is tempting to use a Dirichlet distribution, which allows analytical marginalization.
However, this assumes that the heights of the bins are unrelated except through their overall
normalization. An arbitrarily spiky distribution function is not only unphysical, but we
would be unable to infer its shape from point observations.
We attempted to construct a sensible prior over distributions using histograms with
many bins by coupling the heights of the bins so that the densities appear smooth. Since the
focus on this paper is on the principles of dynamical inference and not on the specific result
on the Solar System's force law, we only provide a brief description of how we implemented
this approach. We refer the interested reader to the references provided in the following
for more details on the specifics. A multivariate Gaussian prior can be put over the log
bin heights, approximating a logistic Gaussian process (Leonard 1978). We used 100 equal-
width bins coupled with a Gaussian covariance function (Rasmussen and Williams 2006).
We put uniform priors over the start and end points of the histogram and over physically
reasonable ranges of the covariance function's parameters. The posterior over the dynamical
parameters was estimated by Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation of all the unknowns,
Gibbs sampling was used to update the dynamical parameters over a grid of values for which
we had precomputed the Jacobian term. Slice sampling (Neal 2003) was used to update all
nuisance parameters, except the bin heights which were updated with a Metropolis -- Hastings
method (Neal 1999, Eq. 15).
7. Results and discussion
In our basic method we evaluate the Jacobian J(ln ǫ, e, φr; ri, vr,i, j2
i ) for each planet
at the observed radius, radial velocity, and specific angular momentum, for each value of
the dynamical parameters ω, and multiply the magnitudes of the determinants of these
Jacobians together. Following equation (18) we multiply this product with the value of the
marginalized product of the distribution function and finally multiply this with the (uniform)
prior on the dynamical parameters in order to obtain the posterior probability distribution
-- 14 --
for the dynamical parameters.
It is instructive to look at the magnitude of the determinant of the Jacobian for each
planet as a function of the dynamical parameters in Figure 5. These factors seem to show a
clear preference for the dynamical parameters of each planet to lie on its virial locus. Why
is this? For nearly circular orbits the last two factors in equation (12) are equal and are
unbounded for perfectly circular orbits; this results in a natural preference for nearly circular
orbits for all of the planets, i.e., for each planet to lie somewhere along its virial locus. At
the same time the measured non-zero radial velocity limits the extent to which a planet's
orbit can be circularized by a suitable choice of the dynamical parameters and, thus, how
close to the circular singularity an individual planet can be brought. This naturally leads
to a weighting scheme in which planets that are closer to circular orbits (as measured by
the observed angle between the planet's velocity and the tangent to the circular orbit going
through its present location) receive a higher weight in the analysis than planets on less
circular orbits. This weighting scheme is good in that planets on more circular orbits are
indeed more informative about the potential than planets on less circular orbits. Therefore,
it may seem that the decision to model the radial asymmetries as uniform in e was fortuitous,
but in fact, as we will discuss below in § 7.1, the results obtained using the basic method are
robust in that more flexible models learn that the tophat in e leads to a good interpretation
of the data.
The posterior probability distribution is shown in Figure 6. A strong peak is apparent
near α = 2 and the Newtonian Solar value for ln A. The width of the probability distribution
is indicated by the 95 and 99 percent posterior contours. These contours are defined to enclose
the smallest area that holds 95 and 99 percent, respectively, of the posterior probability
distribution.
In order to infer the exponent α of the force power-law we perform a second marginal-
ization of the posterior probability distribution, this time over the (for our purposes) unin-
teresting parameter ln A. This gives a posterior probability distribution for the parameter α
p(α{~xi, ~vi}) =Z d ln A p(ω{~xi, ~vi})
.
(19)
This probability distribution is shown in Figure 7. The 95 and 99 percent posterior intervals
in this figure are defined to exclude 2.5 and 0.5 percent, respectively, of the distribution on
either side of the central region.
The result of the inference is not a value for the parameters but a posterior probabil-
ity distribution. A "best fit" value for α could be obtained according to various criteria.
For example, the posterior mean minimizes the expected square difference from the true
parameter. However, since the posterior distribution is multi-modal, a point-estimate does
-- 15 --
not capture our uncertainty. The posterior is better summarized by a credible interval,
containing a given fraction of the probability mass. The 95 percent posterior interval is
1.989 < α < 2.052. This compares favorably with the results obtained by Newton (1687)
who inferred α = 2 from a much richer data set (though a less rich model set). Modern tests
constrain the value of the exponent α to a fractional accuracy of 10−8 -- 10−9 on Solar System
scales (Adelberger, Heckel, & Nelson 2003; Fischbach & Talmadge 1999) using Lunar Laser
Ranging tests (Williams, Turyshev, & Boggs 2004) and Keplerian tests comparing G(r)M⊙
and the rate of precession for different planets (Talmadge et al. 1988).
Our method appears to work well: the true dynamical parameters A and α are plausi-
ble under a fairly tight posterior distribution, see Figure 6. The confidence intervals from
the frequentist tests, Figure 4, are somewhat broader than the posterior intervals, but are
not directly comparable. Frequentist confidence intervals do not represent beliefs about the
parameters for this dataset, simply a region that satisfies some sampling properties. As a
result it is unsurprising that the frequentist confidence intervals appear less good if inter-
preted as beliefs given the data. It is difficult to use the frequentist confidence intervals to
make statements about α alone: without the assumptions of the Bayesian method we cannot
marginalize over the parameter A. One approach that allows frequentist guarantees is to set
A adversarially, but this pessimistic view would give unreasonably large error bars for α.
That the posterior distribution p(α{~xi, ~vi}) turns out to be multi-modal is no surprise
in the light of the virial considerations from Figures 1 and 2. The two peaks in p(α{~xi, ~vi})
correspond to the two main regions in parameter space in which the different virial loci
cross. These virial considerations, and also the frequentist techniques, are very similar
to the probabilistic approach in that they all prefer each planet to be in a non-special
region of radial angle space, that is, between perihelion and aphelion; this can only happen
simultaneously near the points in parameter space at which virial loci cross. The advantage
of the probabilistic approach is that it explains and quantifies this reasoning, and uses it to
set formal limits on the dynamical parameters.
7.1. Sensitivity analysis
The strongly peaked Jacobian factors shown in Figure 5 depend strongly on the choice
of parameterization. If the model was expressed using the radial asymmetries squared rather
than the radial asymmetries, the Jacobians, some of which are shown in Figure 8, are much
flatter. If the model is maintained by also transforming the prior over radial asymmetry dis-
tributions to the new parameterization, the posterior distribution over dynamical parameters
will be unchanged. Setting all the radial asymmetries close to one is penalized elsewhere in
-- 16 --
the mathematical expression.
However, setting the prior over radial asymmetry distributions to consider only uniform
distributions was a strong assumption. If we had only considered distributions uniform in the
radial asymmetry squared, this combined with the flat Jacobians in Figure 8 would not have
given as tight a posterior distribution. Fortunately we can infer a suitable parameterization,
or equivalently the distribution function from a richer family of possibilities, from the data.
Figure 9 shows the posterior over α from using the two more flexible priors outlined in
§ 6.2. Assuming that the radial asymmetry is uniform in one of √e, e, or e2 gave a 95%
credible interval of 1.990 < α < 2.035. A variety of different flexible priors for the radial
asymmetry distribution gave very similar results. Allowing the ln A constant in the force
law to come from a flexible family of distributions changed the posterior very little. The
95% credible interval from the flexible non-parametric prior on both distributions gave a
95% credible interval of 1.991 < α < 2.040. The fine details of the posterior distribution,
specifically the relative mass in the two modes, are sensitive to prior assumptions. This is
unsurprising with only eight data points. However, the position of the bulk of the poste-
rior mass, which gives the confidence interval is surprisingly robust across a wide range of
modeling choices.
As a warning, it is possible to obtain poor results through bad modeling choices. The
reasonable posterior from our basic method, Figure 7, was to some extent due to chance. The
family of possible radial asymmetry distributions is inflexible as it forces this distribution
to be flat over some range in radial asymmetry. Using the basic method it is not possible
to learn the true distribution, which is not flat in radial asymmetry, from data, because the
truth is assigned zero prior probability. We were fortunate to choose a parameterization in
which the inflexible family was not too unreasonable. The non-parametric approach is much
more flexible in that its weak smoothness constraints assign non-zero prior probabilities to
all reasonable distribution functions such that the true one could be picked out with enough
data. However, care must also be taken with non-parametric modeling. An unsmooth
Dirichlet prior over bin heights in a non-parametric prior over distributions gave a broad
and biased distribution over α.
7.2. Future work
The necessity of a proper probabilistic approach as laid out in this paper has been rec-
ognized before in the context of inferring the mass of the Galaxy from a small set of highly
informative tracers: distant satellite galaxies (Little & Tremaine 1987) and high velocity
-- 17 --
stars (Leonard & Tremaine 1990). The limitations of those works are that they choose re-
strictive forms of the distribution function in which the distribution of angular momentum
is fixed as either radial or isotropic, or given as an inflexible parametric function in between
these two extrema (Kochanek 1996). The precision of their results for the fundamental pa-
rameters of the Galaxy is limited by the systematic uncertainty arising from this assumption.
In the case of estimating the local escape velocity from a sample of high velocity stars, a
power law model for the energy part of the distribution function was used; some progress has
been made marginalizing over the exponent, a nuisance parameter, with a prior coming from
cosmological simulations (Smith et al. 2007). In the future, using the technique introduced
in this paper there is no need to make strong assumptions about the degree of anisotropy of
the system at hand or the form of the distribution function beyond the assumption of com-
plete angle mixing. The results of this paper show that by introducing flexible models for
the distribution function that can learn from the data, robust constraints on the parameters
of a dynamical system can be obtained.
The approach developed here can be applied to other (perhaps more pressing) dynamical
inference problems in which test particles can be relied upon to be well-mixed in angle space.
One such problem is the dynamics in the region surrounding the black hole at the Galactic
Center. Often in these problems complications arise because of large observational uncer-
tainties (often highly correlated), the absence of some of the six-dimensional phase-space
coordinates, and selection effects, all of which are absent in the simple problem considered
here. It will be necessary for these problems to model the full six-dimensional phase-space
distribution function. This will complicate the marginalization over the phase-space param-
eters, which was trivial here in the basic method, but at the same time it will permit the
discovery of structure in the phase-space distribution, which can aid with the presence of
missing data and large observational uncertainties. That this approach has much potential
has been shown before in the case of the Galactic Center; the assumption that a set of stars
at the Galactic Center is part of a disk-like population has been successful in reconstructing
missing data (Beloborodov et al. 2006). Extension of the approach developed in this paper
will permit incorporation of much more of the available data on the dynamics in the central
region of the Galaxy. This, in turn, will lead to a better determination of the mass of the
black hole and the surrounding density profile.
On larger scales, approaches like that developed in this paper will prove to be essential
for the analysis of the large data sets of upcoming surveys such as Gaia. As the duration
of the Gaia mission is vanishingly smaller than any dynamical timescale, the problem posed
is essentially the same as the problem posed here: Infer the dynamics from a snapshot of
the kinematics. Our approach cannot simply be applied to this larger problem because the
system is almost certainly not (trivially) integrable, and the assumption of mixed angles and
-- 18 --
lack of resonances is invalidated by the clear abundance of substructure in the halo (e.g.,
Willman et al. 2005; Belokurov et al. 2006, 2007; Koposov et al. 2008) and the disk (Dehnen
1998; Bovy, Hogg, & Roweis 2009); indeed, Jeans himself, in the paper in which he first wrote
down his eponymous theorem (Jeans 1915), argued against assuming a steady state for the
Galaxy. Modeling the details of the phase-space distribution function will be even more im-
portant in this context. However, we expect that a large fraction of the Galaxy, even a large
fraction of the stellar halo, is well-mixed, such that mixed-angle approaches are expected
to lead to valuable inferences. Combining the mixed-angle and unmixed-substructure tech-
niques into a general inference about the dynamics of the Galaxy requires a fully probabilistic
method and the approach developed in this paper is a baby step toward this ambitious goal.
First of all we thank Scott Tremaine for many inspiring discussions that helped shape
this paper.
It is also a pleasure to thank Kyle Cranmer, Dustin Lang, Yuri Levin, Phil
Marshall, Bill Press, and Hans-Walter Rix for very helpful discussions and the anonymous
referee for valuable comments. This research was partially supported by NASA (ADP grant
NNX08AJ48G), the NSF (grant AST-0908357), and a Research Fellowship of the Alexander
von Humboldt Foundation. This project made use of the HORIZONS System provided by
the Solar System Dynamics Group of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the NASA Astrophysics
Data System, and the open-source Python modules scipy, numpy, and matplotlib.
Adelberger, E. G., Heckel, B. R., & Nelson, A. E., 2003, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 53, 77
REFERENCES
Anderson, T. W. & Darling, D. A., 1952, Ann. Math. Stat., 23, 193
Beloborodov, A. M. & Levin, Y., 2004, ApJ, 613, 224
Beloborodov, A. M, Levin, Y., Eisenhauer, F., Genzel, R., Paumard, T., Gillessen, S., &
Ott, T., 2004, ApJ, 648, 405
Belokurov, V., et al., 2006, ApJ, 642, L137
Belokurov, V., et al., 2007, ApJ, 654, 897
Binney, J. & Tremaine, S., 2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition (Princeton University
Press)
Bovy, J., Hogg, D. W., & Roweis, S. T., 2009, ApJ, 700, 1794
-- 19 --
Dehnen, W., 1998, AJ, 115, 2384
Fischbach, E. & Talmadge, C. L., 1999 The Search for Non-Newtonian Gravity, (Berlin:
Springer)
Giorgini, J. D., Yeomans, D. K., Chamberlin, A. B., Chodas, P. W., Jacobson, R. A.,
Keesey, M. S., Lieske, J. H., Ostro, S. J., Standish, E. M., & Wimberly, R. N., 1996,
BAAS, 28, 1158
Jeans, J. H., 1915, MNRAS, 76, 70
Jeffreys, H., 1939, Theory of Probability (Oxford: Clarendon Press)
Johnston, K. V., Zhao, H., Spergel, D. N., & Hernquist, L., 1999, ApJ, 512, L109
Kaasalainen, M. & Binney, J., 1994, Phys. Rev. Lett., 73, 2377
Kendall, M., 1938, Biometrika, 30, 81
Kepler, J., 1609, Astronomia Nova, trans. W. H. Donahue, 1992 (Cambridge University
Press)
Kochanek, C. S., 1996, ApJ, 457, 228
Kolmogorov, A. N., 1941, Ann. Math. Stat., 12, 461
Koposov, S., et al., 2008, ApJ, 686, 279
Kuiper, N. H., 1962, Proc. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen A, 63, 38
Leonard., T., 1978, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B, 40, 113
Leonard, P. J. T. & Tremaine, S., 1990, ApJ, 353, 486
Little, B. & Tremaine, S., 1987, ApJ, 320, 493
Neal., R. M., 1993, Probabilistic Inference Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods. Tech-
nical Report CRG-TR-93-1, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
Neal., R. M., 1999, in Bayesian Statistics 6, ed. J. M. Bernardo et al.. (Oxford University
Press), 475
Neal., R. M., 2003, Ann. Stat., 31, 705
Newton, I., 1687, Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, trans. F. Cajori, 1934
(University of California Press)
-- 20 --
Oort, J. H., 1932, Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherlands, 6, 249
Perryman, M. A. C., et al., 2001, A&A, 369, 339
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A, Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P., 2007, Numerical Recipes:
The Art of Scientific Computing, 3rd Edition (Cambridge University Press)
Rasmussen, C. E. & Williams., C. K. I., 2006 Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (MIT
Press)
Schwarzschild, M., 1979 ApJ, 232, 236
Sivia, D. S. & Skilling, J., 2006, Data Analysis: A Bayesian Tutorial (Oxford University
Press)
Smith, M. C., et al., 2007, MNRAS, 379, 755
Standish, E. M., 1998, JPL Planetary and Lunar Ephemerides, DE405/LE405, JPL IOM
312, F-98-048 (Pasadena, CA: JPL)
Standish, E. M., 2004, A&A, 417, 1165
Stephens, M. A., 1970, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 32, 115
Talmadge, C., Berthias, J.-P., Hellings, R. W., & Standish, E. M., 1988, Phys. Rev. Lett.,
61, 1159
Williams, J. G., Turyshev, S. G., & Boggs, D. H., 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, 261101
Willman, B., et al., 2005, ApJ, 626, L85
This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2.
Table 1. Planet Ephemerides for 2009-Apr-01 00:00:00.0000 (CTa )
Planet
x
(AU)
y
(AU)
z
(AU)
vx
vy
vz
(AU yr−1)
(AU yr−1)
(AU yr−1)
Mercury
Venus
Earth
Mars
Jupiter
Saturn
Uranus
Neptune
0.324190175
-0.701534590
-0.982564148
1.104185888
3.266443877
-9.218802228
19.930781147
24.323085642
0.090955208 -0.022920510 -4.627851589 10.390063716
0.037947785
-0.168809218
-7.205747212
-6.187988860
-0.191145980 -0.000014724
4.524583075
-0.826097003 -0.044595990
-3.888055863 -0.057015321
1.904040630
-2.005021061
1.788299816
1.357933443
-2.555241579 -0.267710968
-17.606227355 -0.197974999
0.935497207
1.725066954
1.126784520
3.260215854
2.076140727
0.335737817 -0.496457364
0.172224285
0.664855006
1.273504997
-0.198268558
0.000330572
0.014760239
-0.054374153
0.054667082
0.002836325
-0.034716967
a CT is a coordinate time used in connection with ephemerides.
seconds (see http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?horizons_doc#timesys).
It differs from UTC by about 66
Note. -- The xyz-coordinate system is defined as follows: the xy-plane is given by the plane of the
Earth's orbit at J2000.0, the x-axis is out along the ascending node of the instantaneous plane of the
Earth's orbit and the Earth's mean equator at J2000.0, and the z-axis is perpendicular to the xy-plane
in the directional (+ or -) sense of Earth's north pole at J2000.0. The origin of the coordinate system is
given by the barycenter of the Solar System. One year is defined as 365.25 days.
--
2
1
--
-- 22 --
Fig. 1. -- The Virial relation between the kinetic energy and the potential energy (equa-
tion [8]) for each of the eight planets in the Solar System. For the combinations of dynamical
parameters in the light gray region in the lower right at least one planet becomes unbound.
When the dynamical parameters are in the light gray region in the upper left at least one
planet has rperi < R⊙. The light gray regions overlap in the dark gray region. In the units
used in this Figure, the "true" value of A lies at ln Ar2
0G−1 = 0.
-- 23 --
Fig. 2. -- Zoomed in version of Figure 1.
-- 24 --
Fig. 3. -- Computed radial angles φr for each of the eight planets as a function of the
dynamical parameters. The gray triangular region in the bottom-right corner is the region
excluded by the condition that all the planets are bound. Each planet has an angle range of
0 < φr < π if it has radial velocity vr > 0 (outgoing from perihelion) or π < φr < 2 π if it
has vr < 0 (incoming from aphelion).
-- 25 --
Fig. 4. -- Various frequentist tests applied to test the uniformity of the angle distribution
and the absence of angle -- energy correlations. From top to bottom, left to right: test of the
mean of the angles; K -- S test for the uniformity of the angle distribution; Kuiper test for
the uniformity of the angles; Kendall τ test for the absence of angle -- energy correlations;
combined confidence intervals from the Kuiper test and the Kendall test; combined confi-
dence intervals from the K -- S test and the Kendall test. In the plots with a single statistic
the darkest region corresponds to the 95 percent confidence region, the lighter region to the
99 percent confidence region. The same is true for the plots with combinations of statistics,
except that a Bonferroni correction has been applied to the significances of the individual
statistics that make up the combination. In each plot the lightest region is excluded because
at least one planet becomes unbound for those parameter values.
-- 26 --
Fig. 5. -- Density plots of the absolute value of the determinant J(ln ǫ, e, φr; r, vr, j2) of the
Jacobian of the transformation from the energy ǫ, radial asymmetry e, and radial angle φr
coordinates to the relevant positional and kinematical observables, evaluated at the observed
positions and velocities of the planets, as a function of the dynamical parameters. Gray scales
are linear with darker shades for larger values.
-- 27 --
Fig. 6. -- The posterior probability distribution p(ω{~xi, ~vi}) for the dynamical parameters
on a linear scale. Contours are 95 and 99 percent posterior regions.
-- 28 --
Fig. 7. -- Marginalized posterior probability distribution for the parameter α with 95 and
99 percent posterior intervals.
-- 29 --
Fig. 8. -- Density plots of the absolute value of the determinant J(ln ǫ, e2, φr; r, vr, j2) of the
Jacobian of the transformation from the energy ǫ, radial asymmetry squared e2, and radial
angle φr coordinates to the relevant positional and kinematical observables, evaluated at the
observed positions and velocities of the planets, as a function of the dynamical parameters.
Grayscales are linear with darker shades for larger values. Only the Jacobians for Mercury
and Venus are shown here; the corresponding Jacobians for the other planets are very similar
to these.
-- 30 --
Fig. 9. -- Alternative posterior probability distributions for the parameter α with 95 and
99 percent posterior intervals. Top: distribution over radial asymmetry is assumed to be uni-
form in one of √e, e or e2. Bottom: results from a non-parametric prior over the distributions
of both e and ln A.
|
1206.1510 | 2 | 1206 | 2013-06-04T20:32:12 | The PTF Orion Project: a Possible Planet Transiting a T-Tauri Star | [
"astro-ph.EP",
"astro-ph.SR"
] | We report observations of a possible young transiting planet orbiting a previously known weak-lined T-Tauri star in the 7-10 Myr old Orion-OB1a/25-Ori region. The candidate was found as part of the Palomar Transient Factory (PTF) Orion project. It has a photometric transit period of 0.448413 +- 0.000040 days, and appears in both 2009 and 2010 PTF data. Follow-up low-precision radial velocity (RV) observations and adaptive optics imaging suggest that the star is not an eclipsing binary, and that it is unlikely that a background source is blended with the target and mimicking the observed transit. RV observations with the Hobby-Eberly and Keck telescopes yield an RV that has the same period as the photometric event, but is offset in phase from the transit center by approximately -0.22 periods. The amplitude (half range) of the RV variations is 2.4 km/s and is comparable with the expected RV amplitude that stellar spots could induce. The RV curve is likely dominated by stellar spot modulation and provides an upper limit to the projected companion mass of M_p sin i_orb < 4.8 +- 1.2 M_Jup; when combined with the orbital inclination, i orb, of the candidate planet from modeling of the transit light curve, we find an upper limit on the mass of the planetary candidate of M_p < 5.5 +- 1.4 M_Jup. This limit implies that the planet is orbiting close to, if not inside, its Roche limiting orbital radius, so that it may be undergoing active mass loss and evaporation. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | The PTF Orion Project: a Possible Planet Transiting a T-Tauri Star
Julian C. van Eyken,1,17,18 David R. Ciardi,1,18 Kaspar von Braun,1 Stephen R. Kane,1
Peter Plavchan,1 Chad F. Bender,2,3 Timothy M. Brown,4 Justin R. Crepp,5 Benjamin J. Fulton,4
Andrew W. Howard,6 Steve B. Howell,7,18 Suvrath Mahadevan,2,3 Geoffrey W. Marcy,6
Avi Shporer,4 Paula Szkody,8,18 Rachel L. Akeson,1 Charles A. Beichman,1 Andrew F. Boden,9
Dawn M. Gelino,1 D. W. Hoard,10 Solange V. Ram´ırez,1 Luisa M. Rebull,10 John R. Stauffer,10
Joshua S. Bloom,6 S. Bradley Cenko,6 Mansi M. Kasliwal,5 Shrinivas R. Kulkarni,5
Nicholas M. Law,11 Peter E. Nugent,12 Eran O. Ofek,13,19 Dovi Poznanski,14 Robert M. Quimby,15
Richard Walters,5 Carl J. Grillmair,10 Russ Laher,10 David B. Levitan,16 Branimir Sesar,5
and
Jason A. Surace10
[email protected]
3
1
0
2
n
u
J
4
.
]
P
E
h
p
-
o
r
t
s
a
[
2
v
0
1
5
1
.
6
0
2
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
-- 2 --
ABSTRACT
We report observations of a possible young transiting planet orbiting a previously
known weak-lined T-Tauri star in the 7 -- 10 Myr-old Orion-OB1a/25-Ori region. The
candidate was found as part of the Palomar Transient Factory (PTF) Orion project.
It has a photometric transit period of 0.448413 ± 0.000040 days, and appears in both
2009 and 2010 PTF data. Follow-up low-precision radial velocity observations and
adaptive-optics imaging suggest that the star is not an eclipsing binary, and that it is
unlikely that a background source is blended with the target and mimicking the observed
transit. Radial-velocity observations with the Hobby-Eberly and Keck telescopes yield a
radial velocity that has the same period as the photometric event, but is offset in phase
1NASA Exoplanet Science Institute, California Institute of Technology, 770 South Wilson Avenue, M/S 100-22,
Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA
2Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
3Center for Exoplanets and Habitable Worlds, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802,
USA
4Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope, Goleta, CA 93117, USA
5Cahill Center for Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA
6Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA
7NASA Ames Research Center, M/S 244-30, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
8Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
9Caltech Optical Observatories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
10Spitzer Science Center, M/S 220-6, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA
91125, USA
11Dunlap Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 50 St. George Street, Toronto M5S
3H4, Ontario, Canada
12Computational Cosmology Center, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA
94720, USA
13Benoziyo Center for Astrophysics, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100 Rehovot, Israel
14School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
15IPMU, University of Tokyo, Kashiwanoha 5-1-5, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba, Japan
16Division of Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
17Currently at Department of Physics, UC Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara CA 93106; [email protected]
18Visiting Astronomer, Kitt Peak National Observatory, National Optical Astronomy Observatory, which is oper-
ated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc. (AURA) under cooperative agreement with
the National Science Foundation
19Einstein Fellow
-- 3 --
from the transit center by ≈ −0.22 periods. The amplitude (half range) of the radial
velocity variations is 2.4 km s−1 and is comparable with the expected radial velocity
amplitude that stellar spots could induce. The radial velocity curve is likely dominated
by stellar spot modulation and provides an upper limit to the projected companion
mass of Mp sin iorb . 4.8 ± 1.2 MJup; when combined with the orbital inclination, iorb,
of the candidate planet from modeling of the transit lightcurve, we find an upper limit
on the mass of the planetary candidate of Mp . 5.5 ± 1.4 MJup. This limit implies that
the planet is orbiting close to, if not inside, its Roche limiting orbital radius, so that it
may be undergoing active mass loss and evaporating.
Subject headings: Open clusters and associations:
satellites: detection -- stars:
PTFO 8-8695 / PTF1 J052507.55+013424.3) -- stars: pre-main sequence
individual (25 Ori) -- planets and
individual (2MASS J05250755+0134243 / CVSO 30 /
1.
Introduction
The Palomar Transient Factory (PTF) Orion project is a study within the broader PTF survey
aimed at searching for photometric variability in the young Orion region, with the primary goal
of finding young extrasolar planets (van Eyken et al. 2011). The project is based on a set of
intensive high-cadence (≈ 70 -- 90 s) observations of a single 7.26 deg2 field centered on the known
25 Ori association, which lies in the Orion OB1a region and has an estimated age of 7 -- 10 Myr
(Briceno et al. 2005, 2007).
Typical young circumstellar disk lifetimes are on the order of 5 -- 10 Myr (Hillenbrand 2008), and
it is during this time that the bulk of the formation and migration of planets is expected to occur.
The youngest exoplanets have been found via direct detection (e.g., LkCa 15, Kraus & Ireland
2012; the free-floating planetary-mass object in the ρ Oph cloud, Marsh et al. 2010); however,
little is known empirically about exoplanets during the first few millions of years of their lives,
and the goal is to fill the observational gap and begin to provide constraints on theories of planet
formation and evolution (see, e.g., Armitage 2009). The stars in the 25 Ori/OB1a region should
be at or just beyond the point of disk dissipation, consistent with the high ratio of weak-lined to
classical T-Tauri stars found there (Briceno et al. 2007). We can therefore look for planet transits
at the time when they may first become observable without their signatures being swamped by
the extreme variability characteristic of the younger classical T-Tauri stars. In so doing, we can
begin to investigate the frequency of planets at these ages; the timescales for their evolution; the
timescales of their migration with respect to the star's evolution; and, through measurements of
the transit depths, probe empirically their mean densities and the extent of their atmospheres,
which are expected to be inflated at these early stages (Fortney & Nettelmann 2010, and references
therein).
Several surveys have been undertaken to search for close-in young exoplanets, though many
-- 4 --
are radial-velocity searches (e.g., Esposito et al. 2006; Paulson & Yelda 2006; Setiawan et al. 2007,
2008; Huerta et al. 2008; Crockett et al. 2011; Nguyen et al. 2012). A transit search (e.g., Aigrain et al.
2007; Miller et al. 2008; Neuhauser et al. 2011) has the advantage of being able to search many more
stars simultaneously, down to fainter magnitudes and with a faster cadence. Combining transit pho-
tometry with spectroscopic information can provide a wealth of information that is unavailable with
non-transiting planets, from masses and radii to constraints on atmospheric composition.
An outline of the PTF Orion project is given by van Eyken et al. (2011), along with some of
the first results concerning binary stars and T-Tauri stars. The broader PTF survey is described in
detail by Law et al. (2009) and Rau et al. (2009), with a summary of the first year's performance
by Law et al. (2010). Here we report a young planet candidate found orbiting a known M3 pre-
main-sequence (PMS) weak-lined T-Tauri star (TTS) within the PTF Orion field. Our observations
are outlined in Section 2; Section 3 discusses the photometric and spectroscopic results and some
implications. The main conclusions are summarized in section 4.
2. Observations
2.1. PTF Photometry
PTF Orion data were obtained using the Palomar 48′′ Samuel Oschin telescope during the
majority of the clear nights between 2009 December 1 and 2010 January 15, whenever the field was
above an airmass of 2.0. All observations were in the R band, and of the 40 nights dedicated, 14
yielded usable data, the remainder being lost primarily to poor weather. Light curves were obtained
for ∼ 110, 000 sources within the field, the top ∼ 500 most variable of which were inspected visually.
The observations and the PTF Orion differential photometry pipeline and data reduction details
are described fully in van Eyken et al. (2011). Specifics of the more general PTF data reduction
pipeline are described by R. Laher et al. (2012, in preparation) and Ofek et al. (2012). Among
the inspected sources, one, PTFO 8-8695 (2MASS J05250755+0134243), showed periodic shallow
transit-like events with a shape and depth suggestive of a planetary companion, superposed on
a larger-scale quasi-periodic variable light curve. The source has previously been identified as a
weak-line T-Tauri star (WTTS) associated with the Orion OB1a region by Briceno et al. (CVSO
30, 2005), and Hern´andez et al. (2007). A summary of the main previously determined properties
of the primary star is given in Table 1. In Figure 1 we show a color-magnitude diagram indicating
PTFO 8-8695 in relation to the other T-Tauri stars in the OB1a region discovered by Briceno et al.
(2005). Although classified as a WTTS, it lies at the younger end of the distribution. This is
consistent with its its relatively strong Hα emission, which in fact places it on the borderline with
classical T-Tauri stars (CTTS) according to the classification scheme of Briceno et al. (2005).
The same field was again observed in the same way over seven clear nights between 2010
December 8 -- 17. The transit events were again evident with the same period and depth. Owing to
improvements in the PTF image processing software, better weather, and mitigation of the CCD
-- 5 --
Table 1. PTFO 8-8695 Stellar Properties
Property
Value
Alternative designations CVSO 30
2MASS J05250755+0134243
PTF1 J052507.55+013424.3
05.h25.m07.s55
α (J2000)
δ (J2000) +01.◦34.′24.3.′′
16.26 maga
V
12.232 ± 0.028 magb
2MASS J
2MASS H 11.559 ± 0.026 magb
11.357 ± 0.021 magb
2MASS KS
Median R 15.19 magc
R range
0.17 mag (min to max)c
Hα equiv. width -11.40Aa
LiI equiv. width 0.40 Aa
Sp. Type M3 (PMS weak-lined T-Tauri)a
Teff
AV
Luminosity
Radius
Mass (Baraffe/Siess)
Age (Baraffe/Siess)
3470 Ka
0.12 maga
a
0.25 L⊙
1.39 R⊙
0.44 M⊙/0.34 M⊙
2.63 Myr/2.68 Myra,e
a,d
a,e
Distance ∼ 330 pc (mean dist. to OB1a/25 Ori assoc.)a,f
aBriceno et al. (2005).
bSkrutskie et al. (2006).
cFrom PTF Orion data (this paper).
dcf. smaller value implied by PTF Orion transit measurements -- see Table 3.
eReported by Briceno et al. (2005) based on comparison with Baraffe et al. (1998) and Siess et al.
(2000) stellar models.
f Briceno et al. (2007)
-- 6 --
Fig. 1. -- Color-magnitude diagram following Briceno et al. (Figure 7, 2005), highlighting PTFO
8-8695 (CVSO 30) -- the star symbol -- in relation to the other T-Tauri stars discovered therein (see
section 2.1). PTFO 8-8695 lies at the younger end of the distribution. Open circles indicate WTTS;
filled circles indicate CTTS. Solid lines indicate, from the top, 1, 3, 10, and 30 Myr isochrones, and
the zero-age main sequence, according to the models of Siess et al. (2000) at a distance of 330 pc.
Photometric measurements are reproduced from Briceno et al. (2005). Reddening and extinction
are neglected.
-- 7 --
fogging effect seen in the previous year's data (see van Eyken et al. 2011; Ofek et al. 2012), the RMS
noise floor for the brightest stars in the 2010 December data set improved from ≈ 4 to ≈ 3 mmag,
with less evidence of systematic effects.1 Figures 2 and 3 show the light curves obtained in the first
and second years of observations with PTF. The quasi-periodic stellar variability is evident, along
with sporadic low-level flaring, consistent with the star's young age and late spectral type. Visual
inspection of the curves revealed the additional regular periodic transit-like signature, with a depth
of ≈ 3 -- 4%, superposed on the stellar variability. We initially determined an approximate period
(≈ 0.45 days) and transit duration (≈ 2 hours) by hand, in order to locate all the transit windows. A
detailed discussion of the light curves and derived properties is given in Section 3.1. The regularity
and planet-like characteristics of the transit events led us to obtain follow-up observations.
2.2. Keck Adaptive Optic Imaging
The PTF imaging instrument is seeing limited and has a point-spread function (PSF) with
typical full-width-half-maximum (FWHM) of 2.0′′, or 660 AU at the estimated distance of the Orion
OB1a and 25 Ori associations (330 pc, Briceno et al. 2005, 2007). We obtained adaptive optics (AO)
images using the NIRC2 camera (PI K. Matthews) on the 10 m Keck II telescope in order to probe
regions in the immediate vicinity of the star and to search for any sources (false positives) that
could mimic the signal of a transiting planet, such as a nearby eclipsing binary. At R = 15.2 mag,
PTFO 8-8695 is sufficiently bright for natural guide star observations and does not require the
use of a laser for atmospheric compensation. We locked the AO system control loops onto the
target using a frame rate of 41 Hz. The airmass was 1.29. We used the NIRC2 narrow camera
setting to provide fine spatial sampling (10 mas pix−1). Our observations consisted of 12 dithered
H -band images (3 coadds per frame, 10 s per coadd), totaling 6 minutes of on-source integration
time. Raw frames were processed by cleaning hot pixels, subtracting background noise from the
sky and detector, and aligning and coadding the results.
Figure 4 shows the final reduced image using an effective field-of-view of 4.9′′ × 4.9′′, which
corresponds to ≈ 4.9 PTF pixels on a side. The image shows no contaminants, except for one faint
source to the south east, at a separation of 1.8′′ (590 AU in the plane of the sky at the distance
of Orion OB1a/25 Ori). Our diffraction-limited images (FWHM ≈ 80 mas) rule out additional
off-axis sources down to a level of ∆H = 4.3, 6.4, 8.9, and 9.1 mag (3σ) at angular separations of
0.25′′, 0.5′′, 1.0′′, and 2.0′′ (83, 165, 330, and 660 pc) respectively. Assuming a color difference of
0 mag, a faint, blended, 100% eclipsing binary would have to be within ∆H ≈ 3.5 -- 3.8 mag of the
primary star, or brighter, to mimic the observed transit depth at R of ≈ 3 -- 4%. At 6.96 mag (608
times) fainter than our target, the one imaged contaminant is too faint to be a blended eclipsing
binary capable of mimicking the observed transits unless it is extremely blue (R − H . −3.2); in
1Independent differential photometric analyses of other PTF data, and respective precision levels, are discussed
in Agueros et al. (2011) and Levitan et al. (2011).
-- 8 --
Fig. 2. -- Photometric light curve for 2009 December 1 -- 2010 January 15 (Sections 2.1 and 3.1.1).
Gray regions indicate the transit windows, fixed at the measured transit period, width, and epoch
of center-transit (T0). Red points indicate data automatically flagged by the data reduction soft-
ware as potentially non-optimal for various possible reasons (e.g., imperfect weather, evidence of
contamination within the photometric aperture, etc.)
-- 9 --
Fig. 3. -- As for Figure 2, for 2010 December 8 -- 17.
-- 10 --
Fig. 4. -- Adaptive optics imaging of PTFO 8-8695, showing the full image field (left), and detail
around the central star (right), at two different logarithmic brightness stretches. A very faint source
is detected to the south east of the central star at a separation of 1.8′′, 6.96 mag fainter than the
central source, and unlikely to be capable of mimicking the observed transits (indicated by the
arrow, left panel); otherwise no contaminants are detected. (Section 2.2.)
that event, however, it would be unlikely to be stellar in origin in any case. Any other such binary
would have to lie within 0.25′′ of our target in order not to have been detected.
2.3. LCOGT, KPNO 4 m, and Palomar 200′′ Vetting
Photometric observations were obtained in 2011 February with the Las Cumbres Observatory
Global Telescope Network (LCOGT), using the 2 m Faulkes North and South telescopes, and the
0.8 m Byrne Observatory telescope at Sedgwick Reserve (BOS). We were able to confirm complete
transit detections on two separate nights with the BOS telescope with a clear filter (see Figure 5).
Observations in SDSS g′ and i′ with the three telescopes were inconclusive, and largely hampered
by poor observing conditions and sparse phase coverage. The LCOGT observations enabled us to
confirm the transit event and its period independently of the PTF data, and, in combination with
the PTF data, we were able to establish a more accurate and up-to-date transit ephemeris.
In addition we obtained low-precision followup radial velocity (RV) observations with the
KPNO 4 m Mayall telescope and the Palomar 200′′ Hale telescope over 3 and 2 consecutive nights,
respectively, to allow us to rule out a stellar-mass companion as the cause of the transits. The
separate confirmation of the transit event and the lack of RV signature at the level of ∼ 10 km s−1
suggested that we had indeed detected a sub-stellar object, and we pursued additional observations.
-- 11 --
Fig. 5. -- Transit observations obtained with the LCOGT BOS 0.8 m telescope (clear filter), on
the nights of 2011 February 8 and 9 (Section 2.3). Gray regions again indicate the predicted
transit windows using the period and T0 obtained with the PTF data. The second night shows a
possible small flare at the end of the transit. Note that in addition to stellar variability, some of
the systematic trends may also be air-mass related.
2.4. HET and Keck Spectroscopy
Following the AO vetting and low-precision RV followup, we obtained Doppler radial ve-
locity spectroscopy with both the High Resolution Spectrograph (HRS; Tull 1998) on the 9.2 m
Hobby Eberly Telescope (HET; Ramsey et al. 1998), and the High Resolution Echelle Spectrom-
eter (HIRES; Vogt et al. 1994) on the 10 m Keck I telescope. The goal was to detect or place an
upper limit on any signal due to reflex stellar motion caused by the orbiting companion.
The queue-schedule operation mode of the HET (Shetrone et al. 2007) allowed us to obtain
four spectroscopic radial velocity observations very quickly after analysis of the low-precision RV
and LCOGT photometric vetting data. The observations were timed on the basis of prior knowledge
of the transit ephemeris to best constrain any orbital signature.
Observations from the fiber-fed HRS spectrograph and calibrated using ThAr exposures pro-
vide radial velocity precision of better than 50 m s−1 over timescales of several weeks (Bender et al.
2012). Seeing-induced PSF changes are minimal due to the image scrambling properties of optical
fibers (Heacox 1987) and the HRS temperature is kept stable to ∼ 0.01 C. We used the 15k reso-
lution mode of HRS, with the red cross-disperser setting (316g7940), giving a wavelength coverage
of 6114 -- 9861 A. The use of this lower resolution setting enhances the efficiency of HRS without
significantly degrading the information content in the stellar spectrum (since the target absorption
lines were already known to be rotationally broadened). Each observation was 1200 s in duration,
except on UT 2011-02-21 which was 1600 s, and ThAr calibration frames were taken immediately
after each to track instrument drift. Data for the four nights were reduced in IDL with a custom op-
timal extraction pipeline that performs bias subtraction, flat fielding, order tracing and extraction,
and wavelength calibration of the extracted one-dimensional spectra. A simultaneous sky-fiber was
-- 12 --
available with this spectrograph setting, but we chose to avoid the additional complexity inherent
in performing sky subtraction with a fiber-fed spectrograph, and instead masked areas affected by
sky lines so that they were not used in calculating the RVs. The achieved signal to noise in each
spectrum was approximately 40 -- 50 per resolution element, peaking in the I -band. We identified
the strongest absorption lines in an M2-type high resolution Kurucz stellar model2 (Kurucz 2005),
and used these to select lines for fitting in the measured spectra.
For the Keck data, we observed PTFO 8-8695 using the standard procedures (e.g., Howard et al.
2009) of the California Planet Search (CPS) for HIRES. The five observations over 10 days were
each 500 -- 600 s in duration and achieved a signal to noise ratio of 10 -- 20 per pixel (S/N = 20 -- 40
per resolution element) in the V -band. We used the "C2" decker (0.86′′ wide slit) for a spectral
resolution of ∼60,000. The total wavelength coverage was ≈ 3650 -- 7970 A.
Owing to the faintness of the target and the relatively relaxed precision requirements, we
employed in both cases thorium-argon (ThAr) emission lamps as the fiducial reference. This avoids
the light-throughput penalty incurred by the higher precision common-path iodine gas absorption
cell, which is better suited to brighter targets.
Data reduction and analysis were performed independently at separate institutions for the two
data sets, using independently written software, but following the same general principles. Visual
inspection of the spectra readily revealed strong rotational line broadening (vr sin i∗ = 80.6 ±
8.1 km s−1 -- see section 3.2.2), to the extent that only the very strongest of the photospheric lines
were evident above the noise level. The low signal-to-noise ration (S/N) and high stellar rotational
velocity resulted in a very small number of lines from which to measure the radial velocity. Using
a cross-correlation analysis on the HRS spectra to measure these broad, low S/N lines yielded a
velocity uncertainty of ∼ 10 -- 14 km s−1. Such an analysis is very sensitive to bad pixels or faint sky
lines, which were difficult to remove in the low S/N regime. In addition, a cross correlation strongly
benefits by combining the information content of multiple lines with fixed relative spacings. In our
data, viable lines tended to be spaced far apart: typically there were only one or two lines per
spectral order, which negated much of the advantage of using a cross-correlation. Consequently, we
adopted an alternative approach of fitting individual stellar lines with Gaussian functions, solving
each line independently for its center, width, and depth. This fitting procedure was much less
sensitive than cross-correlation to bad pixels or to the precise spectral window being analyzed. It
also allowed us to mask out telluric absorption and strong, narrow night sky emission lines.
The faintness of the target and the small semi-major axis of the putative companion's orbit
meant that very high RV precision was neither anticipated nor required. Simple Gaussian+linear-
term profiles provided an adequate fit (i.e., reduced χ2 ∼ 1) owing to the low S/N and heavy
broadening (and probable blending) of the lines, where more sophisticated models would have
added unnecessary and unconstrained extra parameters. A weighted average of the shifts in the
2http://kurucz.harvard.edu
-- 13 --
fit centroids with respect to the rest wavelengths of the stellar lines provided the required Doppler
shifts. Since substantially differing S/N in the various lines precluded a simple standard-deviation --
based estimate of the measurement errors, errors were instead estimated by propagating the formal
errors from the Gaussian fits to the lines. In the case of the Keck data, corrections were made for
measured variation in the telluric lines to account for residual uncalibrated instrument drift, but
these corrections were found to be negligible. A total of 14 absorption features spanning ∼ 5300 --
7700 A were fit in the Keck data, and 14 spanning ∼ 6100 -- 8700 A in the HET data. The measured
RVs are listed in table 2.
3. Discussion
3.1. Photometry
3.1.1. Light Curves and Periodicities
In order to model the transit events for a derivation of the transit and planetary candidate
properties, the effects of the stellar variability in the light curves need to minimized -- i.e., the light
curves outside of transit needed to be whitened. After removing data points which are flagged or
have large measurement errors, we fit a smooth cubic spline to all the PTF data which fall outside
the transit windows (using the IDL imsl cssmooth function3), interpolating across the windows
themselves. The fit is then subtracted (in magnitude space) from the entire light curve. Since
most of the stellar variability occurs on longer timescales than the transits (with the exception
of the occasional flares), this process yields the "whitened" light curve that has the majority of
the stellar variability removed, leaving only the transits. Using a standalone version of the NASA
Exoplanet Science Institute (NExScI) periodogram tool,4 we calculate the Plavchan periodogram
(Plavchan et al. 2008) of the combined whitened data sets, to provide a more accurate formal
transit period measurement. We find a clear peak at 0.448413 ± 0.000040 d.5
Figure 6 shows the whitened data for the nights where any in-transit data were obtained, folded
on the measured period. Short-term stellar variability is not corrected, and is probably the most
likely explanation for those transits (particularly those from JDs 2455175, 2455192, and 2455545)
which deviate significantly in shape from the general form of the others. This may be caused by
a combination of low-level flaring, residual disk occultation, and the companion transiting small-
scale stellar surface features. JD 2455192 appears to show a flare immediately after the transit,
3From the IDL Advanced Math & Stats module; see http://www.ittvis.com/idl
4See http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu
5We make the assumption that there is no phase shift in the transit timing between the first and second years,
such that the datasets can be combined to give a year-long time baseline, and thus a very precise period estimate. If
we disregard this assumption, the first year's data alone gives the best period estimate, P = 0.4486 ± 0.0010 d.
-- 14 --
and also likely the tail of a second flare mid-transit, though the gaps in the data prevent a clear
interpretation. JD 2455545 appears to show an early transit egress; however, the mid-transit
variation and the disparity in comparison to other transits in the same year are suggestive of the
above mentioned variability effects, which may confuse and mask the true egress time.
The original "un-whitened" light curve is dominated by stellar variability (see Figures 2 and 3).
If we assume that the large-scale variability is caused primarily by spot modulation, and that the
relative effect of the transit events is negligible, we can use the un-whitened data to investigate the
stellar rotation. Lomb-Scargle periodograms (Lomb 1976; Scargle 1982) of the two years' data are
shown in Figure 7. Where the Plavchan periodogram is designed for finding regular periodic features
of arbitrary but constant shape (such as a transit), a Lomb-Scargle periodogram is better suited
for finding periodic modes in a more complex signal such as the quasi-periodic stellar variation in
our data: here, the signal appears not to repeat in an exact fashion and therefore does not fold
well at any period (likely because of phase shifts due to changing spot features).
A strong peak is found at 0.4481 ± 0.0022 d, in fact matching well with the transit period.
Another peak is seen at 0.9985 ± 0.0061 d, corresponding closely to the sidereal or solar Earth day,
and therefore most likely an artifact resulting from the observing cadence. The other peaks all
appear to be aliases of these two periods. To confirm this, we modeled the data by creating an
artificial light curve from two summed sinusoids with the same two periods, providing power at the
frequencies of these two peaks. We superimposed artificial transits modeled as a simple inverted
top-hat function, with the same depth, width, and ephemeris as the real transits. Allowing the
phases and relative amplitude of the 0.4481 d and 0.9985 d signals to vary as free parameters, and
requiring that the total amplitude of the light curve remain approximately the same as that of
the actual data, we performed a least-squares fit to the real periodogram to assess how well its
structure could be reproduced. Figure 7 shows the results, with a good match between model and
data. Repeating the test with the 0.4481 d sinusoid omitted (i.e., summing only the one-day signal
and the transits) gave a poor fit, implying that the form of the periodogram cannot be explained
by the transits alone. Since there is clearly strong correlated out-of-transit variability associated
with the star, and there are no other fundamental periods evident in the periodogram, the 0.4481 d
signal appears to be the only likely period for the star.
There are three other notable aliases of the presumed stellar rotation period, P∗, at 0.3092 ±
0.0010 d, 0.8126 ± 0.0070 d, and 4.43 ± 0.31 d (identified in the figure). The larger of these is
substantially above the upper period limit implied by the measured vr sin i∗ of the star (Section
3.2.2), P∗ < 2πR∗/(vr sin i∗) = 0.671 ± 0.092 d. Though it is unlikely that the star would be
coincidentally rotating at an alias of the transit period with the Earth's rotation, we repeated the
modeling experiment with the model stellar rotation modified to match the remaining two aliases
to ensure that none could in fact be the true fundamental stellar period (see Dawson & Fabrycky
2010). Similar periodograms were obtained, with peaks at similar locations but with differing
strength ratios; none were as good a fit to the periodograms based on the real data. We therefore
conclude that the star is co-rotating or near co-rotating with the companion orbit.
-- 15 --
Fig. 6. -- Whitened light curves for nights where in-transit data were obtained, folded on the transit
period (Section 3.1.1; left and right panels show first and second year's data respectively). Flux
values are normalized to unity outside of eclipse, and nights are offset vertically in increments of 0.1
for clarity. Transits are further distinguished in alternating black and gray, and crosses (red in the
online color version) indicate data flagged as potentially compromised. The Julian day on which
each transit occurred is indicated for comparison with Figures 2 and 3. The light gray regions
indicate the transit windows. Note that partially covered transits with little or no data on one
or other side of the transit window are likely to suffer from poor stellar-variability correction and
show significant systematic error.
-- 16 --
Fig. 7. -- Lomb-Scargle periodogram of the non-whitened light curves from the two years of PTF
Orion observations, compared to simple synthetic models (Section 3.1.1). The presumed stellar
rotation period is marked with a thick arrow (red in the online color version); a second distinct
one-day period, which we attribute to the observing cadence, is marked with a thin (blue) arrow.
The more prominent aliases of these periods are indicated with vertical lines: thick (red) marks
indicate peaks which are predominantly produced by aliases of the presumed stellar rotation period;
thin (blue) marks indicate peaks predominantly produced by aliases of the one-day period. Dotted
(magenta) lines indicate peaks produced by a combination of the two.
-- 17 --
We note that it is difficult to model the observed transit events with star spots alone, partic-
ularly in the 2009 December/2010 January data: the short transit duration relative to the period,
the flat bottom of the transits, and the sharp ingress and egress, are all more characteristic of a
transiting object, whereas spots tend to cause smoother, more sinusoidal features as their projected
area changes as they rotate across the stellar disk. It is more likely that we are seeing in the total
lightcurve the effects of both star spots and a transiting object.
3.1.2. Transit Fitting
We fit transit models to the whitened light curves using the IDL-based Transit Analysis
Package (TAP; Gazak et al. 2012). TAP employs Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)
techniques to explore the fitting parameter space based on the analytic transit light curve mod-
els of Mandel & Agol (2002). The package incorporates white- and red-noise parameterization
(Carter & Winn 2009), allowing for robust estimates of parameter uncertainty distributions. We
fit only the transits from nights where a complete transit was observed with adequate coverage
both before and after the transit window, since on these nights the spline fit to remove the stellar
variability is reasonably constrained on both sides of the transit; on nights where there is partial
transit coverage, the spline fit tends to diverge during transit time. We also reject the transits men-
tioned in section 3.1 where stellar variability appears to strongly affect the shape of the transit, and
in addition, the transit from JD 2455544, where the spline subtraction was particularly uncertain
and rather sensitive to the tightness of the spline fit. Thus we fit four of the transits from the first
year's data (JDs 2455201, 2455202, 2455205, and 2455211), and three from the second year (JDs
2455539, 2455540, and 2455543). The folded data are shown in Figure 8.
For the transit fitting, we hold the orbital period, P , fixed to the transit period determined
above. The eccentricity, e, is fixed at zero, since it is difficult to constrain in the absence of a
secondary eclipse. White and red noise levels are allowed to float separately for each individual
transit, as are linear airmass trends. The remaining parameters are allowed to float, but are tied
across all transits. They include: the epoch of transit center, T0 (we assume there are no transit
timing drifts between the two years); the orbital inclination, iorb; a/R∗, where a is the orbital semi-
major axis, and R∗ is the radius of the primary; Rp/R∗, where Rp is the companion radius; and the
linear and quadratic limb-darkening coefficients for the primary star. In addition, we constrain the
fitting such that Rp/R∗ < 1, and white and red noise components are less than 4% (the depth of the
transit). Parameters are calculated by fitting Gaussians to the dominant peak in the probability
density distributions for each parameter resulting from the MCMC analysis. The center location
of the Gaussian is taken as the parameter value, and measurement errors are estimated as the
dispersion of the fit. We find that the limb-darkening coefficients are largely unconstrained by the
data. The fit is shown overlaid on the folded data in Figure 8; the corresponding parameters are
listed in Table 3.
There is significant variation in the light curve from transit to transit, as can be seen in Figure
-- 18 --
Table 2. Differential Radial Velocity Measurements
HJD
RV
Telescope
2455613.668022
2455615.649694
2455616.640274
2455623.622875
2455663.744361
2455670.747785
2455671.755651
2455672.757479
2455673.770857
( km s−1)
1.81±0.64
2.41±0.64
-2.36±0.64
0.55±0.64
-1.53±0.91
-0.01±0.96
-1.38±1.03
0.10±1.02
2.83±1.33
HET
HET
HET
HET
Keck
Keck
Keck
Keck
Keck
Note. -- RV uncertainties listed are formal uncertainties, and do not account for systematic
effects. The offset between the two data sets is arbitrary, and set by shifting each set so that its
mean is zero, excluding one outlier data point -- see Sections 2.4 and 3.2.1.
Fig. 8. -- Folded light curve for the two years of observations combined, after removing stellar
variability (Section 3.1.1). The first year's data (2009 December -- 2010 January) are plotted
in black; the second year's (2010 December) are plotted in orange. A change in transit shape
between the two years is evident. The best transit fit to both years combined is over-plotted on the
assumption that Rp < R∗ (Section 3.1.2). Limb darkening is neglected, and error bars are omitted
for clarity; the median photometric error is 0.0046, with an out-of-eclipse standard deviation of
0.0056.
-- 19 --
Table 3. System Parameters
Parameter
Value
Measured
P 0.448413 ± 0.000040 d
iorb
a/R∗
Rp/R∗
T0 (HJD)
vr sin i∗
61.8 ± 3.7◦
1.685 ± 0.064
0.1838 ± 0.0097
2455543.9402 ± 0.0008
80.6 ± 8.1 km s−1
Derived
a
0.00838 ± 0.00072 AU
= 1.80 ± 0.15 R⊙
1.07 ± 0.10 R⊙
1.91 ± 0.21 RJup
Mp sin iorb ≤ 4.8 ± 1.2 MJup
Mp ≤ 5.5 ± 1.4 MJup
R∗
Rp
a
b
Note. -- Summary of parameters determined in this paper for the PTFO 8-8695 system. Quan-
tities are P -- orbital period; iorb -- orbital inclination; i∗ -- inclination of stellar rotation axis; a --
orbital semi-major axis; R∗ -- stellar radius; Rp -- planet radius; T0 -- epoch of transit center; vr --
stellar equatorial rotational velocity; Mp -- planet mass.
aFrom Kepler's third law, assuming stellar mass M∗ = 0.39 ± 0.10 M⊙ (Briceno et al. 2005), and
Mp ≪ M∗.
bUpper limit derived from measured RV semi-amplitude.
-- 20 --
6. This can reasonably be attributed to the companion passing across varying surface features --
cold or hot spots, or perhaps flares -- on the stellar photosphere. Such variations are a result of the
planet tracing the stellar surface brightness profile as it traverses the stellar disk, and cannot be
removed by the whitening process, which is only sensitive to the integrated brightness of the disk.
Since PTFO 8-8695 is expected to be active and spotted, such variation in the transits is further
suggestive of a genuine transit, rather than a background blend.
It can also clearly be seen from Figures 6 and 8, however, that there is an overall change in
the transit shape between the two years' data sets. Explanations for this remain speculative. Re-
running the fitting process and allowing a change in both R∗ and Rp between the two years yields a
decrease in stellar radius of ≈ 10% (2.1σ) from one year to the next (with no measurable change in
companion radius). Such a large change in the stellar radius in such a short time period is unlikely,
and would likely manifest itself in observable rotation rate changes not seen in the data. A change in
transit shape could also arise in principle from a change in orbital geometry. For example, the host
star is rotating quickly enough to exhibit significant oblateness, which may induce precession of the
orbital plane and, therefore, changes in iorb if the orbital and stellar rotational axes are misaligned.6
An additional planet in a different orbit could also produce a similar effect (Miralda-Escud´e 2002).
It is difficult, however, to explain how an inclination change can yield a transit that becomes
both more grazing (longer ingress/egress) and deeper at the same time. Another explanation may
be variation in star spot coverage (or limb-darkening, though with heavy spot coverage, the two
effects become somewhat confused). In addition to short-term spot variations, there may be surface
features which survive for much longer periods (see, e.g., Mahmud et al. 2011). Given the activity
of the star and the extreme proximity of the companion, such features may be compounded by
magnetic or tidal star/planet interactions that could give rise to varying hot or cold spots near the
sub-planetary point on the stellar photosphere. This could affect the apparent shape of the transit
in a systematic way. The planet's apparent proximity to the tidal disruption limit (see section 3.3)
may also be a factor: a tidally distorted shape, or transient rings or a tidal tail of evaporating
material could all yield unexpected and possibly varying transit shape (and also cause the slight
transit asymmetry seen in the second year's data). For the sake of simplicity, and given the lack of
data to disentangle all of these possibilities, we here adopt the single combined fit to both years'
data sets, although with the caveat that the variability may cause some systematic error in the
measurements.
We note that our fit yields a somewhat smaller stellar radius, R∗ ≈ 1.07 R⊙, than that pre-
6Given the small orbital period, this may occur on short timescales. Following Miralda-Escud´e (2002), we estimate
the order of magnitude of the oblateness-induced gravitational quadrupole moment of the host star, J2, by scaling
to the pre-main -- sequence from a solar value of ∼ 10−7 -- 10−6 according to J2 ∝ R3
∗ ). Assuming that the
stellar obliquity is small, and noting that the orbital angular momentum and stellar rotational angular momentum
are similar for Mp ∼ 5 MJup (so that the inclinations of the stellar rotation and orbital planes with respect to the
mean plane are similar), this leads to a precession period of the orbital nodes on the order of tens to hundreds of
days.
∗/(M∗P 2
-- 21 --
viously reported by Briceno et al. (2005) (1.39 R⊙). Assuming their estimate of Teff = 3470 K
is correct, interpolating Siess models (Siess et al. 2000) with this updated radius gives a slightly
older age estimate for the star, ≈ 3.7 Myr vs. 2.7 Myr. Given the distance uncertainties in the
Briceno et al. (2005) results, however, and the possibility of uncertainty in Teff arising from heavy
spotting in the stellar photosphere, the two radius estimates are probably not inconsistent.7
3.2. Spectroscopy
3.2.1. Radial Velocities
Since the RV analysis is differential in nature, the RV offset between the HET and Keck
data sets is arbitrary. We place them on the same approximate scale by shifting the RV zero
points to the mean of the data for each data set. There are too few data points to create a
periodogram to measure any periodicities in the data, but we can look for consistency with the
previously determined transit period by folding the data on that period and looking for a coherent
alignment of the data points. The result is shown in Figure 9: indeed, the data appear to phase
well, showing a smooth and apparently sinusoidal variation, with the exception of one outlying
data point at orbital phase φ = −0.082 (Heliocentric Julian date (HJD) 2455615.64969), which is
discussed further below. This outlier is excluded in calculating the offset between the data sets.
To constrain the mass of the companion, we fit a Keplerian orbit model to the data using the
RVLIN package by Wright & Howard (2009). The model includes six parameters: the period, P ;
the RV semi-amplitude, K; the eccentricity, e; the argument of periastron, ω; the time of periastron
passage, Tp; and the systemic velocity, γ. We fixed P and Tp to the values measured from the transit
photometry. Since the χ2 surface has multiple minima, we explore the fitting parameter space by
running 10000 trial Keplerian fits (neglecting the apparent outlier point), with initial parameter
estimates drawn at random from reasonable starting distributions, and selecting the fit with the
lowest reduced χ2 (χ2
red).
We find that the constraints from the transit ephemeris make it difficult to obtain a reasonable
Keplerian fit. A good circular-orbit fit, with the eccentricity, e, fixed to zero, is prohibited by the
constraint on T0 provided by the photometry. Such a fit must cross its central velocity at phases 0
and 0.5, with minima and maxima at 0.25 and 0.75 (the quadrature points), and as a result appears
significantly out of phase with the data (χ2
red = 4.0; dashed line, Figure 9).
An eccentric fit goes some way to resolving the mismatch (χ2
red = 1.1), but yields an eccentricity
of e ≈ 0.492 (dotted line, Figure 9). This places the fractional periastron distance at rperi/a ≡
7Our radius estimate also depends on our estimate of a, which depends in turn on the assumption that the mass
estimate of Briceno et al. (2005) is correct, so the argument is somewhat circular. a, however, is relatively insensitive
to stellar mass (a ∝ M 1/3), and the Siess models predict a negligible difference in mass at our older age. (In fact, at
the estimated Teff, they predict a mass range smaller than the errors over an age range of 1 -- 10 Myr.)
-- 22 --
Fig. 9. -- Differential radial velocity measurements obtained with Keck/HIRES and HET/HRS
(Section 3.2.1). Zero phase is chosen to correspond to the photometric center-of-transit time. The
offset between the two datasets is chosen to match the mean RV of each. The lines indicate best
Keplerian fits (excluding the outlier): dashed line -- circular orbit, transit-center time, T0, fixed
to photometry (χ2
red = 4.0); dotted line -- eccentric orbit, transit-center time fixed to photometry
(χ2
red = 1.1); solid line -- a sinusoidal fit (equivalent to a circular orbit) at the same period, with
phase free to float (χ2
red = 0.42). The eccentric fit is better than the fixed-T0 fit, but brings the
companion to the surface of the star at periastron. The floating-phase sinusoidal fit gives the best
result, suggesting that star spots either modify or dominate the Doppler RV signal. The outlier
point may represent Rossiter McLaughlin effect due to the transiting companion.
-- 23 --
1 − e ≈ 0.51, bringing the companion to the point of contact with the surface of the star as
determined from the photometric transit fits (R∗/a ≈ 0.51). Such a solution may be improbable,
given that in section 3.3 we note that the orbital semi-major axis appears to be close to the Roche
limit.
A better fit is in fact obtained by fitting a circular orbit model and removing the constraint
on T0, allowing the phase to float. This fit is over-plotted in Figure 9, showing the fit is good
(χ2
red = 0.42), but offset in phase from the transit ephemeris by −0.22 ± 0.04 periods.
We favor this better fit to the RV signal, which most likely arises because of spot effects
modulated by the stellar rotation, where the amplitude of the spot effect is at least comparable
to -- if not much greater than -- any true reflex Doppler signal from the companion. Similar
spot-induced RV amplitudes have already been observed for other T-Tauri stars in the optical
(e.g., Mahmud et al. 2011; Huerta et al. 2008; Prato et al. 2008). Since the star appears to be
co-rotating with the planet orbit, the period of such a spot-dominated RV signal would match the
orbital period, but the phase would be arbitrary, depending on the longitudinal spot placement.
Alternatively, spot and companion RV signals may both be significant and the two effects may
compete (see Section 3.3).
Regardless of the astrophysical cause behind the measured RV signal, we can place an upper
limit on the companion mass, and because of the good orbital phase coverage we can be reasonably
assured that possible aliasing effects are not a concern. We assume that any companion-induced
Doppler motion must be smaller than the amplitude of the measured variations, that Mp ≪ M∗,
and that M∗ = 0.39±0.10 M⊙ (Briceno et al. 2005), and hence estimate Mp sin iorb ≤ 4.8±1.2 MJup
(see, e.g., formula 3, Gaudi & Winn 2007). Taking our derived value of iorb we can directly estimate
Mp ≤ 5.5 ± 1.4 MJup, comfortably within the planetary mass regime. The semi-amplitude (half
peak-to-peak) of the combined measured RV variations is ≈ 2.4 km s−1. This is separately confirmed
by the two individual datasets, which both have good phase coverage and show similar amplitudes
independent of the RV offset (as can be seen in Figure 9). By comparison, since Doppler-induced
RV semi-amplitude scales directly with Mp, a 25 MJup object on the planet/brown-dwarf boundary
suggested by Schneider et al. (2011) would induce an 11 km s−1 signal; an object on the deuterium-
burning limit (≈ 13 MJup) would induce a 5.7 km s−1 signal. It is unlikely, therefore, that the object
is of more than planetary mass, and still less in the stellar mass range.8 Since the spot distribution
is likely to change with time, further observations to look for changes in the phase of the RV signal
with respect to the transit ephemeris may provide more insight into the exact nature of the RV
signal. RV observations in the infra red are also likely to suffer less from spot-induced noise, and
so could also provide valuable further information.
We were unable to find any abnormalities in the observations regarding the outlying RV data
8We do note, however, that there is a possibility that if the reflex Doppler signature and the spot signature
are of comparable amplitudes, matching periods, and opposed in phase, they may destructively interfere, giving an
artificially low RV amplitude.
-- 24 --
point, and, thus, have no reason to reject it as a bad measurement. However, falling at an orbital
phase φ = −0.082, it lies within the transit window (c.f. Figure 8), and its anomalous velocity
could reasonably be explained as arising from the Rossiter-McLaughlin (RM) effect (Rossiter 1924;
McLaughlin 1924). The RM effect would appear regardless of whether the main RV signal is caused
by spot modulation or stellar reflex motion, since it is a result of an asymmetric distortion of the
stellar absorption lines as an obscuration transits the unresolved stellar disk, blocking off regions
with successively different rotational red-shifts. Indeed, given the rapid stellar rotation, the RM
effect should be expected to appear during the transit window. From equation 6 of Gaudi & Winn
(2007) we can estimate the expected maximum amplitude of the effect, KR, given vr sin i∗, Rp, and
R∗. We find KR ≈ 3 km s−1, in good agreement with the offset of the outlier. The RM maximum
also lies typically around ∼ 1/5 -- 1/3 of the way between transit-ingress and transit-center for gas-
giant planets, which is coincidentally where the outlier point is located. The sign of the offset of the
outlier data point, falling prior to the transit center time, is in agreement with a prograde orbit, as
we would expect if the star is in synchronous (or quasi-synchronous) rotation. It should be noted
that the RV data point at φ = +0.039 (HJD 2455671.755651) also lies within the transit window
but, in contrast, does not appear to be an outlier. Lying closer to the transit center time, one
would expect the RV offset to be smaller here; however, the exact form of the RM effect depends
on the precise orbital geometry, and may be partially masked by the choice of offset between the
two data sets. Further complication may also arise from the companion transiting photospheric
surface features. Dedicated RV measurements during transit could provide valuable confirmation of
the RM effect hinted at by the data, and help independently confirm the validity of the transiting
planet candidate.
3.2.2. Stellar Rotation
The stellar rotation velocity, vr, measured from the spectroscopy provides an independent
consistency check on the stellar rotation period. In order to estimate the projected rotation velocity,
vr sin i∗, we degrade the Kurucz synthetic model spectrum (see Section 2.4) to the resolution and
sampling of the HRS, and rotationally broaden it using a non-linear limb-darkening model (Claret
2000; Gray 1992) over the range of vr sin i∗ = 10 -- 150 km s−1. We then Doppler shift the broadened
models, line by line, by cross-correlating against lines in our target spectrum. Subtracting a Doppler
shifted model from the observed spectrum gives an RMS residual for that rotational velocity.
Minimizing this residual gives the optimal rotational velocity measured for an individual line. We
applied this analysis to 12 lines that were sufficiently deep to be visible above the noise for our full
range of vr sin i∗ models. Weak lines could not be used because at large vr sin i∗ the line profiles
became buried in the noise. The weighted average of vr sin i∗ measured for these lines, across all
four HRS observations, was 80.6 ± 8.1 km s−1.
The assumed rotational period of the star and the radius measured from photometric transit
fitting (neglecting oblateness effects) independently imply an expected value for the unprojected
-- 25 --
rotational velocity of vr = 2πR∗/P∗ ≈ 120 ± 11 km s−1. Taken together, the measured vr sin i∗ and
the photometrically derived vr give an estimated inclination of the stellar rotation axis, i∗ = 42±7◦.
Comparing this with the measured orbital inclination, iorb = 61.8 ± 3.7◦, we see that there is weak
evidence for a possible misalignment between the orbital and stellar rotation axes (consistent with
the possibility of detecting changes in the orbital inclination on relatively short timescales, as
mentioned in Section 3.1.2).
3.3.
Implications
In Figure 10 we show the radius and mass of the companion in relation to the currently known
transiting exoplanets listed in the NASA Exoplanet Archive,9 where we have indicated the mass
of the candidate as an upper limit only. It clearly lies at the upper end of the gas-giant radius
distribution, although not unprecedentedly so. A significantly inflated atmosphere is to be expected
owing both to the system's very young age, and to stellar irradiation at the companion's exception-
ally small orbital radius. Planetary atmosphere models are currently not well constrained in this
regime due to the lack of known exoplanets that are both young and close-in. Marley et al. (2007)
and Fortney et al. (2007) caution that evolutionary models should be treated with care at ages
up to 10 Myr or more, being highly dependent on initial conditions and the formation mechanism
assumed. Indeed, Spiegel & Burrows (2012) suggest that comparison of atmospheric models with
observations of exoplanets at such young ages may be a good way of distinguishing between differ-
ent formation scenarios. Both Spiegel & Burrows (2012) and Marley et al. (2007) predict radii of
around 1.6 RJup for a 5 MJup planet at 3 Myr, for non-irradiated 'hot-start' (gravitational collapse)
model atmospheres; our error bars place our measured radius (1.9 ± 0.2 R⊙) just above this value.
Our radius lies substantially further above the post-formation cold-start (core collapse) isochrones,
though comparison with the latter models is confused by uncertainty in the formation timescale,
which is likely comparable to the age of the star. Accounting for stellar irradiation could increase
the theoretical radius further. Increases of ∼ 10% or more are typical at ∼ 0.02 AU from a so-
lar like star (Baraffe et al. 2010; Chabrier et al. 2004), where the incident flux is similar to that
on our planet candidate (which is closer in, but orbiting a lower-mass star). The companion's
proximity to the Roche limit may also weaken the gravitational binding of the object, further in-
creasing its expected radius. Various other explanations are also proposed to explain the excess
"radius anomaly" that is increasingly found in other gas-giant exoplanets (e.g., Baraffe et al. 2010;
Chabrier et al. 2011). Our estimated radius is therefore not unreasonable, but due to both the
model and observation uncertainties, a robust comparison with theory is difficult.
The apparent companion to PTFO 8-8695 also orbits close enough to its parent star that the
consequent small size of its Roche lobe may be relevant. Below a certain mass threshold, it may
not have sufficient self-gravity to hold itself together, and thus may begin to lose mass. Following
9http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu
-- 26 --
Fig. 10. -- Radius vs. mass for the known transiting planets (Section 3.3; data taken from the
NASA Exoplanet Archive). PTFO 8-8695b is marked as an upper mass limit, highlighted by the
large square. Iso-density contours are marked at 0.5, 1, 1.33 (Jupiter density), 5, and 10 g cm−3.
-- 27 --
Faber et al. (2005) and Ford & Rasio (2006), the Roche radius, RRoche, according to Paczy´nski
(1971), is given by
RRoche = 0.462(Mp/M∗)1/3a ≤ 0.462(Mp,max/M∗)1/3a ≈ 1.92 ± 0.16,
(1)
where Mp,max is our previously estimated maximum mass for the companion. Comparing with the
measured companion radius gives Rp/RRoche & 0.994 ± 0.094. Framing the argument another way,
we can rewrite the Roche formula to estimate the Roche limiting orbital radius, RRoche, in terms
of the measured companion radius to find a/aRoche . 1.008 ± 0.095 at the most -- consistent with
being at or within the Roche limit, within the errors. The planet may be sufficiently inflated that
it fills its Roche lobe, and consequently may have lost mass in the past, or be in the process of
losing mass (thus maintaining itself at the Roche limit).
4. Conclusions
We have detected transits from a candidate young planet orbiting a previously-identified co-
rotating or near-co-rotating ≈ 2.7 Myr-old M3 weak-line T-Tauri star. Although we cannot com-
pletely rule out a false positive due to source blends, we are able to rule out confusion at the level
of ∆H ≈ 4.3 mag beyond a separation of 0.25′′, and argue qualitatively that a false detection due
to a blended eclipsing binary is unlikely. The companion is in an exceptionally rapid 0.448413 d
orbit, placing it among the shortest of the currently known exoplanet periods (cf. Demory et al.
2011; Charpinet et al. 2011; Muirhead et al. 2012; Rappaport et al. 2012). With an orbital radius
only around twice the stellar radius, it appears to be at or within its Roche limiting orbit, with
a/aRoche . 1.01±0.10, raising the possibility of past or ongoing evaporation and mass loss. Perhaps
the companion has been migrating, and losing any mass beyond its Roche lobe as it does so; or
perhaps it is continually being inflated to fill its Roche lobe, with any material which overflows
being stripped away.
Although the transit photometry and the RV data both phase-fold on the same periods, there
is an apparent offset in phase between them. The most likely explanation is that the RV signal is
shifted or dominated by the effect of star spots; we therefore suggest an upper limit on the (incli-
nation independent) companion mass of ≈ 5 MJup based on the amplitude of the RV modulation.
If it can be assumed that the object has had time to reach a stable (or quasi-stable) state -- i.e.,
that mass loss rates are not too rapid, and that there have been no recent dramatic changes in the
orbital geometry -- then Roche limit considerations would imply a lower limit of a similar order,
since anything much less would be unable to gravitationally bind the material within the measured
companion radius.
The data are complex enough that we cannot yet be certain of a planet detection. In favor
of the planetary interpretation, however, we note that: (1) the photometric transit shape appears
to be flat bottomed with sharp ingress and egress slopes, and is difficult to explain with a star-
spot model alone; (2) the transits appear highly consistent and periodic over a period of & 1 yr,
-- 28 --
which would be unusual for spots; (3) the RV signal places an upper mass limit well within the
planetary regime; (4) a false positive due to a faint blended eclipsing binary is argued against by
two observations which are suggestive of a transiting object associated with the primary T-Tauri
star observed: the stellar rotation rate appears very close to the transit period, suggesting co-
rotation; and the photometric variation from transit to transit is consistent with the notion of a
planet transiting a heavily spotted T-Tauri star.
Further spectroscopic and photometric observations are needed to provide a clearer picture.
Since the star is such a fast rotator, the expected RM effect (hinted at in the data) may provide a
valuable opportunity for confirmation of the candidate. Most RV noise sources will be constant in
the timescale of one transit, so further RV observations during the transit window could potentially
provide full sampling of the effect. This would help confirm the planetary interpretation of the data,
and could provide further useful information on the system geometry. Revisiting the target to make
further measurements of the RV phase with respect to the transit ephemeris would help confirm the
spot-interference interpretation: if spots are significant, the phase offset is likely to change with time
as the spots change. Infra-red RV observations, which are less sensitive to spot-induced noise, would
also provide valuable further information, perhaps allowing for an unambiguous determination of
the companion mass.
Given the young age of the system, the planet candidate is likely hot, and so a secondary
transit may also be detectable with more precise photometry, allowing constraints to be placed on
the companion temperature. Finally, simultaneous multi-band photometry and spectroscopy (par-
ticularly in the infra-red, where spot-effects should be lessened) could further help disentangle the
signatures of star spots and companion. This would also help to establish the cause of the apparent
overall change in transit shape between the two years' observing runs, which could result either
from changes in the spot distribution or possibly, given the exceptionally short orbital timescale,
changes in the orbital geometry.
If our interpretation of the data is correct, the putative planet's youth and its unique proximity
to its host star will make it a valuable object for helping inform our understanding of exoplanet
formation. Its young age could have important implications for the mechanism by which it formed:
conventional core-accretion formation models (Pollack et al. 1996) occur on timescales of ∼ 1 --
10 Myr, comparable with or longer than the age of the system; the much more rapid gravitational-
instability mechanism (Boss 1997, 2000) occurs on timescales orders of magnitudes shorter, and
may thus perhaps be favored (see Baraffe et al. 2010, for a brief overview and comparison of the two
mechanisms). The companion's inflated atmosphere appears indicative of the "hot start" models of
Marley et al. (2007) and Spiegel & Burrows (2012), which are associated with gravitational insta-
bility. At the same time, we cannot rule out that formation may yet be incomplete given the young
age of the system. Neither can we rule out that the companion may be on the verge of evaporation
and may not survive the lifetime of the star. Indeed, very few large planets are known to orbit
small stars, and this object may well be transient. Much ambiguity remains at these young ages,
and more observation and analysis of the system is needed. If the planetary nature of the proposed
-- 29 --
companion is confirmed, the system could provide a wealth of new information for constraining
dynamical and atmospheric evolution models for exoplanets. We therefore propose PTFO 8-8695
as an object worthy of further careful study by the community.
The authors acknowledge Tim Morton and Dimitri Veras for their helpful input. S.B.C. wishes
to acknowledge generous support from Gary and Cynthia Bengier, the Richard and Rhoda Gold-
man Fund, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)/Swift grant NNX10AI21G,
NASA/Fermi grant NNX1OA057G, and National Science Foundation (NSF) grant AST -- 0908886.
S.M. acknowledges support from NSF awards AST-1006676, AST-1126413, PSARC, and the NASA
Astrobiology Institute.
Observations obtained with the Samuel Oschin Telescope at the Palomar Observatory as part
of the Palomar Transient Factory project, a scientific collaboration between the California Institute
of Technology, Columbia University, Las Cumbres Observatory, the Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory, the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, the University of Oxford,
and the Weizmann Institute of Science.
The Hobby-Eberly Telescope (HET) is a joint project of the University of Texas at Austin,
the Pennsylvania State University, Stanford University, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen,
and Georg-August-Universitat Gottingen. The HET is named in honor of its principal benefactors,
William P. Hobby and Robert E. Eberly.
Some of the data presented herein were obtained at the W.M. Keck Observatory, which is
operated as a scientific partnership among the California Institute of Technology, the University of
California and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Observatory was made
possible by the generous financial support of the W.M. Keck Foundation. The authors wish to
recognize and acknowledge the very significant cultural role and reverence that the summit of
Mauna Kea has always had within the indigenous Hawaiian community. We are most fortunate to
have the opportunity to conduct observations from this mountain.
The Byrne Observatory at Sedgwick (BOS) is operated by the Las Cumbres Observatory Global
Telescope Network and is located at the Sedgwick Reserve, a part of the University of California
Natural Reserve System.
This research has made use of the NASA Exoplanet Archive, which is operated by the California
Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
under the Exoplanet Exploration Program.
This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which
is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis
Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Admin-
istration and the National Science Foundation.
This research has made use of the VizieR catalogue access tool, CDS, Strasbourg, France; and
-- 30 --
of the software package Uncertainties: a Python package for calculations with uncertainties, Eric
O. Lebigot.10
This work was partially supported by funding from the Center for Exoplanets and Habitable
Worlds. The Center for Exoplanets and Habitable Worlds is supported by the Pennsylvania State
University, the Eberly College of Science, and the Pennsylvania Space Grant Consortium.
Support for this work was provided by an award issued by JPL/Caltech.
Facilities: PO:1.2m (PTF), HET (HRS), Keck:I (HIRES), Keck:II (NIRC2), LCOGT (BOS),
FTN, FTS, Mayall, Hale
REFERENCES
Agueros, M. A., Covey, K. R., Lemonias, J. J., Law, N. M., Kraus, A., Batalha, N., Bloom, J. S.,
Cenko, S. B., Kasliwal, M. M., Kulkarni, S. R., Nugent, P. E., Ofek, E. O., Poznanski, D.,
& Quimby, R. M. 2011, ApJ, 740, 110
Aigrain, S., Hodgkin, S., Irwin, J., Hebb, L., Irwin, M., Favata, F., Moraux, E., & Pont, F. 2007,
MNRAS, 375, 29
Armitage, P. J. 2009, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 1192, American
Institute of Physics Conference Series, ed. F. Roig, D. Lopes, R. de La Reza, & V. Ortega,
3 -- 42
Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. H. 1998, A&A, 337, 403
Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., & Barman, T. 2010, Reports on Progress in Physics, 73, 016901
Bender, C. F., Mahadevan, S., Deshpande, R., Wright, J. T., Roy, A., Terrien, R. C., Sigurdsson,
S., Ramsey, L. W., Schneider, D. P., & Fleming, S. W. 2012, ApJ, 751, L31
Boss, A. P. 1997, Science, 276, 1836
-- . 2000, ApJ, 536, L101
Briceno, C., Calvet, N., Hern´andez, J., Vivas, A. K., Hartmann, L., Downes, J. J., & Berlind, P.
2005, AJ, 129, 907
Briceno, C., Hartmann, L., Hern´andez, J., Calvet, N., Vivas, A. K., Furesz, G., & Szentgyorgyi, A.
2007, ApJ, 661, 1119
Carter, J. A. & Winn, J. N. 2009, ApJ, 704, 51
10http://packages.python.org/uncertainties
-- 31 --
Chabrier, G., Barman, T., Baraffe, I., Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. H. 2004, ApJ, 603, L53
Chabrier, G., Leconte, J., & Baraffe, I. 2011, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 276, IAU Symposium, ed.
A. Sozzetti, M. G. Lattanzi, & A. P. Boss, 171 -- 180
Charpinet, S., Fontaine, G., Brassard, P., Green, E. M., van Grootel, V., Randall, S. K., Silvotti,
R., Baran, A. S., Østensen, R. H., Kawaler, S. D., & Telting, J. H. 2011, Nature, 480, 496
Claret, A. 2000, A&A, 363, 1081
Crockett, C. J., Mahmud, N. I., Prato, L., Johns-Krull, C. M., Jaffe, D. T., & Beichman, C. A.
2011, ApJ, 735, 78
Dawson, R. I. & Fabrycky, D. C. 2010, ApJ, 722, 937
Demory, B.-O., Gillon, M., Deming, D., Valencia, D., Seager, S., Benneke, B., Lovis, C., Cubillos,
P., Harrington, J., Stevenson, K. B., Mayor, M., Pepe, F., Queloz, D., S´egransan, D., &
Udry, S. 2011, A&A, 533, A114
Esposito, M., Guenther, E., Hatzes, A. P., & Hartmann, M. 2006, in Tenth Anniversary of 51 Peg-b:
Status of and prospects for hot Jupiter studies, ed. L. Arnold, F. Bouchy, & C. Moutou,
127 -- 134
Faber, J. A., Rasio, F. A., & Willems, B. 2005, Icarus, 175, 248
Ford, E. B. & Rasio, F. A. 2006, ApJ, 638, L45
Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., & Barnes, J. W. 2007, ApJ, 659, 1661
Fortney, J. J. & Nettelmann, N. 2010, Space Sci. Rev., 152, 423
Gaudi, B. S. & Winn, J. N. 2007, ApJ, 655, 550
Gazak, J. Z., Johnson, J. A., Tonry, J., Dragomir, D., Eastman, J., Mann, A. W., & Agol, E. 2012,
Advances in Astronomy, 2012, 697967
Gray, D. F. 1992, The Observation and Analysis of Stellar Photospheres, 2nd edn. (Cambridge;
New York: Cambridge University Press)
Heacox, W. D. 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 4, 488
Hern´andez, J., Calvet, N., Briceno, C., Hartmann, L., Vivas, A. K., Muzerolle, J., Downes, J.,
Allen, L., & Gutermuth, R. 2007, ApJ, 671, 1784
Hillenbrand, L. A. 2008, Physica Scripta Volume T, 130, 014024
Howard, A. W., Johnson, J. A., Marcy, G. W., Fischer, D. A., Wright, J. T., Henry, G. W.,
Giguere, M. J., Isaacson, H., Valenti, J. A., Anderson, J., & Piskunov, N. E. 2009, ApJ,
696, 75
-- 32 --
Huerta, M., Johns-Krull, C. M., Prato, L., Hartigan, P., & Jaffe, D. T. 2008, ApJ, 678, 472
Kraus, A. L. & Ireland, M. J. 2012, ApJ, 745, 5
Kurucz, R. L. 2005, Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplementi, 8, 14
Law, N. M., Dekany, R. G., Rahmer, G., Hale, D., Smith, R., Quimby, R., Ofek, E. O., Kasliwal,
M., Zolkower, J., Velur, V., Henning, J., Bui, K., McKenna, D., Nugent, P., Jacobsen, J.,
Walters, R., Bloom, J., Surace, J., Grillmair, C., Laher, R., Mattingly, S., & Kulkarni,
S. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series,
Vol. 7735, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series,
77353M
Law, N. M., Kulkarni, S. R., Dekany, R. G., Ofek, E. O., Quimby, R. M., Nugent, P. E., Surace,
J., Grillmair, C. C., Bloom, J. S., Kasliwal, M. M., Bildsten, L., Brown, T., Cenko, S. B.,
Ciardi, D., Croner, E., Djorgovski, S. G., van Eyken, J., Filippenko, A. V., Fox, D. B., Gal-
Yam, A., Hale, D., Hamam, N., Helou, G., Henning, J., Howell, D. A., Jacobsen, J., Laher,
R., Mattingly, S., McKenna, D., Pickles, A., Poznanski, D., Rahmer, G., Rau, A., Rosing,
W., Shara, M., Smith, R., Starr, D., Sullivan, M., Velur, V., Walters, R., & Zolkower, J.
2009, PASP, 121, 1395
Levitan, D., Fulton, B. J., Groot, P. J., Kulkarni, S. R., Ofek, E. O., Prince, T. A., Shporer, A.,
Bloom, J. S., Cenko, S. B., Kasliwal, M. M., Law, N. M., Nugent, P. E., Poznanski, D.,
Quimby, R. M., Horesh, A., Sesar, B., & Sternberg, A. 2011, ApJ, 739, 68
Lomb, N. R. 1976, Ap&SS, 39, 447
Mahmud, N. I., Crockett, C. J., Johns-Krull, C. M., Prato, L., Hartigan, P. M., Jaffe, D. T., &
Beichman, C. A. 2011, ApJ, 736, 123
Mandel, K. & Agol, E. 2002, ApJ, 580, L171
Marley, M. S., Fortney, J. J., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., & Lissauer, J. J. 2007, ApJ, 655, 541
Marsh, K. A., Kirkpatrick, J. D., & Plavchan, P. 2010, ApJ, 709, L158
McLaughlin, D. B. 1924, ApJ, 60, 22
Miller, A. A., Irwin, J., Aigrain, S., Hodgkin, S., & Hebb, L. 2008, MNRAS, 387, 349
Miralda-Escud´e, J. 2002, ApJ, 564, 1019
Muirhead, P. S., Johnson, J. A., Apps, K., Carter, J. A., Morton, T. D., Fabrycky, D. C., Pineda,
J. S., Bottom, M., Rojas-Ayala, B., Schlawin, E., Hamren, K., Covey, K. R., Crepp, J. R.,
Stassun, K. G., Pepper, J., Hebb, L., Kirby, E. N., Howard, A. W., Isaacson, H. T., Marcy,
G. W., Levitan, D., Diaz-Santos, T., Armus, L., & Lloyd, J. P. 2012, ApJ, 747, 144
-- 33 --
Neuhauser, R., Errmann, R., Berndt, A., Maciejewski, G., Takahashi, H., Chen, W. P., Dimitrov,
D. P., Pribulla, T., Nikogossian, E. H., Jensen, E. L. N., Marschall, L., Wu, Z.-Y., Kellerer,
A., Walter, F. M., Briceno, C., Chini, R., Fernandez, M., Raetz, S., Torres, G., Latham,
D. W., Quinn, S. N., Niedzielski, A., Bukowiecki, L., Nowak, G., Tomov, T., Tachihara, K.,
Hu, S. C.-L., Hung, L. W., Kjurkchieva, D. P., Radeva, V. S., Mihov, B. M., Slavcheva-
Mihova, L., Bozhinova, I. N., Budaj, J., Vanko, M., Kundra, E., Hamb´alek, L., Krushevska,
V., Movsessian, T., Harutyunyan, H., Downes, J. J., Hernandez, J., Hoffmeister, V. H.,
Cohen, D. H., Abel, I., Ahmad, R., Chapman, S., Eckert, S., Goodman, J., Guerard, A.,
Kim, H. M., Koontharana, A., Sokol, J., Trinh, J., Wang, Y., Zhou, X., Redmer, R., Kramm,
U., Nettelmann, N., Mugrauer, M., Schmidt, J., Moualla, M., Ginski, C., Marka, C., Adam,
C., Seeliger, M., Baar, S., Roell, T., Schmidt, T. O. B., Trepl, L., Eisenbeiss, T., Fiedler, S.,
Tetzlaff, N., Schmidt, E., Hohle, M. M., Kitze, M., Chakrova, N., Grafe, C., Schreyer, K.,
Hambaryan, V. V., Broeg, C. H., Koppenhoefer, J., & Pandey, A. K. 2011, Astronomische
Nachrichten, 332, 547
Nguyen, D. C., Brandeker, A., van Kerkwijk, M. H., & Jayawardhana, R. 2012, ApJ, 745, 119
Ofek, E. O., Laher, R., Law, N., Surace, J., Levitan, D., Sesar, B., Horesh, A., Poznanski, D., van
Eyken, J. C., Kulkarni, S. R., Nugent, P., Zolkower, J., Walters, R., Sullivan, M., Agueros,
M., Bildsten, L., Bloom, J., Cenko, S. B., Gal-Yam, A., Grillmair, C., Helou, G., Kasliwal,
M. M., & Quimby, R. 2012, PASP, 124, 62
Paczy´nski, B. 1971, ARA&A, 9, 183
Paulson, D. B. & Yelda, S. 2006, PASP, 118, 706
Plavchan, P., Jura, M., Kirkpatrick, J. D., Cutri, R. M., & Gallagher, S. C. 2008, ApJS, 175, 191
Pollack, J. B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., Lissauer, J. J., Podolak, M., & Greenzweig, Y. 1996,
Icarus, 124, 62
Prato, L., Huerta, M., Johns-Krull, C. M., Mahmud, N., Jaffe, D. T., & Hartigan, P. 2008, ApJ,
687, L103
Ramsey, L. W., Adams, M. T., Barnes, T. G., Booth, J. A., Cornell, M. E., Fowler, J. R., Gaffney,
N. I., Glaspey, J. W., Good, J. M., Hill, G. J., Kelton, P. W., Krabbendam, V. L., Long, L.,
MacQueen, P. J., Ray, F. B., Ricklefs, R. L., Sage, J., Sebring, T. A., Spiesman, W. J., &
Steiner, M. 1998, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference
Series, Vol. 3352, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference
Series, ed. L. M. Stepp, 34 -- 42
Rappaport, S., Levine, A., Chiang, E., El Mellah, I., Jenkins, J., Kalomeni, B., Kite, E. S., Kotson,
M., Nelson, L., Rousseau-Nepton, L., & Tran, K. 2012, ApJ, 752, 1
-- 34 --
Rau, A., Kulkarni, S. R., Law, N. M., Bloom, J. S., Ciardi, D., Djorgovski, G. S., Fox, D. B.,
Gal-Yam, A., Grillmair, C. C., Kasliwal, M. M., Nugent, P. E., Ofek, E. O., Quimby, R. M.,
Reach, W. T., Shara, M., Bildsten, L., Cenko, S. B., Drake, A. J., Filippenko, A. V., Helfand,
D. J., Helou, G., Howell, D. A., Poznanski, D., & Sullivan, M. 2009, PASP, 121, 1334
Rossiter, R. A. 1924, ApJ, 60, 15
Scargle, J. D. 1982, ApJ, 263, 835
Schneider, J., Dedieu, C., Le Sidaner, P., Savalle, R., & Zolotukhin, I. 2011, A&A, 532, A79
Setiawan, J., Henning, T., Launhardt, R., Muller, A., Weise, P., & Kurster, M. 2008, Nature, 451,
38
Setiawan, J., Weise, P., Henning, T., Launhardt, R., Muller, A., & Rodmann, J. 2007, ApJ, 660,
L145
Shetrone, M., Cornell, M. E., Fowler, J. R., Gaffney, N., Laws, B., Mader, J., Mason, C., Odewahn,
S., Roman, B., Rostopchin, S., Schneider, D. P., Umbarger, J., & Westfall, A. 2007, PASP,
119, 556
Siess, L., Dufour, E., & Forestini, M. 2000, A&A, 358, 593
Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., Weinberg, M. D., Schneider, S., Carpenter, J. M.,
Beichman, C., Capps, R., Chester, T., Elias, J., Huchra, J., Liebert, J., Lonsdale, C.,
Monet, D. G., Price, S., Seitzer, P., Jarrett, T., Kirkpatrick, J. D., Gizis, J. E., Howard,
E., Evans, T., Fowler, J., Fullmer, L., Hurt, R., Light, R., Kopan, E. L., Marsh, K. A.,
McCallon, H. L., Tam, R., Van Dyk, S., & Wheelock, S. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163
Spiegel, D. S. & Burrows, A. 2012, ApJ, 745, 174
Tull, R. G. 1998, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series,
Vol. 3355, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series,
ed. S. D'Odorico, 387 -- 398
van Eyken, J. C., Ciardi, D. R., Rebull, L. M., Stauffer, J. R., Akeson, R. L., Beichman, C. A.,
Boden, A. F., von Braun, K., Gelino, D. M., Hoard, D. W., Howell, S. B., Kane, S. R.,
Plavchan, P., Ram´ırez, S. V., Bloom, J. S., Cenko, S. B., Kasliwal, M. M., Kulkarni, S. R.,
Law, N. M., Nugent, P. E., Ofek, E. O., Poznanski, D., Quimby, R. M., Grillmair, C. J.,
Laher, R., Levitan, D., Mattingly, S., & Surace, J. A. 2011, AJ, 142, 60
Vogt, S. S., Allen, S. L., Bigelow, B. C., Bresee, L., Brown, B., Cantrall, T., Conrad, A., Couture,
M., Delaney, C., Epps, H. W., Hilyard, D., Hilyard, D. F., Horn, E., Jern, N., Kanto, D.,
Keane, M. J., Kibrick, R. I., Lewis, J. W., Osborne, J., Pardeilhan, G. H., Pfister, T., Rick-
etts, T., Robinson, L. B., Stover, R. J., Tucker, D., Ward, J., & Wei, M. Z. 1994, in Society
of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 2198, Society of
-- 35 --
Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, ed. D. L. Crawford &
E. R. Craine, 362
Wright, J. T. & Howard, A. W. 2009, ApJS, 182, 205
This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2.
|
1302.3960 | 3 | 1302 | 2013-03-18T09:38:45 | Earth Inner Core Periodic Motion due to Pressure Difference Induced by Tidal Acceleration | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | The inner structure of the earth is still a topic of discussion. Seismic measurements showed a structure of solid, liquid, solid which describes the mantle, outer core and inner core with the inner core in the center. The analysis of waveform doublets suggests now that the inner core is out of center and even of faster rotation than the mantel and crust. From the sum of Buoyancy and Gravity on the earth inner core, the position energy is plotted and together with the tangential tidal acceleration, it is derived that Earth Inner Core cannot be in a center position without additional force. The Earth Core System is explained as Hydrodynamic Bearing. The tidal acceleration is identified as the reason for the periodic motion of the inner core and certain frequencies of nutation. The Eccentricities out of nutation due to the effects from the sun and moon are calculated as an approximation. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | 1
Earth ’s Inner Core Periodic Motion due to Pressure Difference
Induced by Tidal Acceleration
Martin Wolf
E-mail:[email protected]
Summary
The inner structure of the earth is still a topic of discussion. Seismic
measurements showed a structure of solid, liquid, solid which describes the
mantle, outer core and inner core with the inner core in the center. The
analysis of waveform doublets suggests now that the inner core is out of
center and even of faster rotation than the mantel and crust. From the sum of
Buoyancy and Gravity on the earth’s inner core, its position energy is plotted
and together with the tangential tidal acceleration, it is derived that Earth´s
Inner Core cannot be in a center position without an additional force. The
Earth Core System is explained as Hydrodynamic Bearing. The tidal
acceleration is identified as the reason for the periodic motion of the inner
core and certain frequencies of nutation. The Eccentricities responsible for
nutation due to the effects from the sun and moon are calculated as an
approximation.
1. Buoyancy and Gravity
To investigate the inner earth, the forces on the Earth Inner Core (EIC) are calculated here, using PREM data.
It was found to be useful to calculate the Buoyancy (B) and the Gravity (G) on the EIC as a function of
eccentricity (E) in a numerical way. The centrifugal force due to the initial rotation of the earth is not considered
here because the influence is minor.
With the EIC out of center, there is a G on the EIC coming from the liquid outer core surrounding EIC. The liquid mass
adding up to G has to be within the smallest globe concentric to the earth ’s center, including EIC (Figure 1), whose radius is
given by r.
2
Figure 1: The grey area marks the mass responsible for the gravity on the Earth’s inner core (schematically).
If the EIC is in the center, the forces from pressure from all the sides cancel out each other, therefore the B is zero (Figure 2).
With growing E, B rises (Figure 2).
Figure 2: The buoyancy and the minus of gravity are equal at eccentricity zero and near 1150 km.
From Figure 2 it can be seen that there are several positions where the sum of forces on the EIC is zero. B dominates over G
near the center.
To be able to judge the stability of EIC the position energy (U) of the EIC out of the sum of B and G, has to be examined.
In Figure 3 it becomes clear that there is an unstable equilibrium for the EIC at eccentricity zero.
3
Figure 3: The Position energy U of the earth inner core out of the sum of buoyancy and gravity over the eccentricity.
Out of the center EIC would be driven away from the center. The equilibrium at about +/- 1150 km would be stable.
2. Tidal effect
Now the Tangential Tidal effect has to be taken into account. The sum of centrifugal acceleration (ac) and gravitational
acceleration (ag) produce the tidal effect. Due to the eccentricity of the earth orbiting the sun, there is a strong tangential tidal
acceleration (at) on the earth at the position C (Figure 4). The magnitude can be calculated as an approximation by:
at(C) = ε m γ / a².
(2.1)
ε is the numeric eccentricity (in this case of the earth orbit) equal to sin(α), with α as in Figure 4, m is the mass of the sun in
this case, γ is the gravitational constant and a is the distance F1 to C in this case sun earth (Figure 4).
Figure 4: The Earth’s tangential tidal acceleration (schemati cally).
4
The peak value of at appears very close to C on the Perihelion side and despite the fact that at(C) according to 2.1 is an
approximation, it is almost identically to the value at the peak of the sun earth system:
at(C) = 9.91E-05 m/s² .
In an anomalistic period there is a non sinusoidal periodic behavior with two peaks per year near C and D (Figure 4). Due to
the axial tilt of the earth at can be separated into an equatorial (eq) and a polar (po) part (Figure 5). Superposing at over to the
gravitational acceleration (g) produces:
g ’ = at + g.
(2.2)
Since g is a vector pointing to the center of the earth and at can be considered as a constant vector over the earth core in this
Figure 5: The absolute value of the tangential tidal acceleration from the sun to the earth in an anomalistic year separated in its
equatorial (eq) and polar (po) part.
context, g ’ is increased by at on one hemisphere and diminished on the other he hemisphere. The position of g ’ equal to zero
is 27.5 m eccentric to the Perihelion side at maxima of at.
It is more interesting that the hydrostatic pressure (p) at the EIC also changes:
p = Σ ρ g ’ h.
(2.3)
ρ is the density of the layer, g ’ is the average total acceleration at the corresponding layer and h is the height of the layer. The
liquid hemisphere on one side is periodic subject to a higher g ’ than the one on other side and subsequently the hydrostatic
pressure also changes.
With an EIC in an unstable equilibrium at center position plus a periodic changing hydrostatic pressure situation on the EIC,
it should be underlined that the EIC in center or near center position [5] cannot be explained by B, G and at. The model
described so far is theoretical because EIC would drift away to the position of E near 1150 km. There is a force missing that
5
keeps EIC concentric or near concentric.
3. Hydrodynamic Effect
Now it has to be remembered that the earth is rotating with an approximately constant angular velocity. The external
asymmetric influence of at together with B ensures that the EIC remains in the Perihelion hemisphere. A rotating earth with
an EIC which stays eccentric towards the Perihelion side forces the liquid outer core to flow around an obstacle. The liquid
outer core passes a nozzle like geometry towards the point of minimum distance between EIC and mantel (Figure 6). This
produces a hydrodynamic force with the necessary stabilizing quality that keeps the drifting of the EIC in limits. The given
system is what in technical terms is called a Hydrodynamic Bearing (HB). The force out of such a HB depends on (a) the
relative velocity (vr) between the moving partners (EIC and solid mantel), (b) the dynamic viscosity of the liquid between the
partners subject to shear velocity, (c) the charged area and (d) the eccentricity that creates the nozzle like geometry [3]. The
vr between EIC and the boundary layer is a consequence of the supposed constant angular velocity (Figure 6).
Figure 6: The relative velocity between EIC and the boundary layer in the plane of motion, plus the flow lines for the supposed
laminar flow, given schematically.
The stream of liquid material passing the EIC gives an accelerating torsional momentum to it (the partner with the lower
velocity). The EIC has been slightly accelerated by this periodic momentum over a long period of time. Therefore, seismic
measurements proposing a faster rotating EIC [6] are proved to be accurate by this work.
4. Earth as a Gyroscope
The motion of the inner core raises the question: How much is the displacement? From astronomic observations it is known
that the earth is subject to a motion called nutation of the same frequency as at. To do the exact calculation to work out the
eccentricity of the EIC from certain frequencies of nutation would involve solving the Liouville's theorem [2] with torsional
momentum zero [1]:
.
(4.1)
6
ω being the angular velocity, l the vector of relative angular momentum and J the mass momentum of inertia.
Assuming that only the ω and J of the rotation axis of earth are changing permits an approximation. The movement of the
EIC could be calculated because of:
and
L = J ω.
(4.2)
(4.3)
L is the angular momentum vector. The change in ω equal to an earth rotation variation can be described by the nutation of
length of 1.3187 ” with a period of 182.6 days [4] c onsistent with at in frequency. The eccentricity necessary is about 40 km
at maximum due to the influence of the sun. There is also a nutation of length of 0.2274 ” with a perio d of 13.7 days [4]
consistent with the influence of the moon. The result is an eccentricity of about 60 km to produce this nutation. These values
are small compared to the diameter of EIC of 2443 km. For a HB the eccentricities are especially small and a HB on such low
eccentricities is known to be susceptible to oscillations [3].
5. Conclusion
The detail that B dominates over G near the center is the main cause for the fact that EIC cannot be in the center. The at is the
trigger for the movement out of center, also providing its direction and giving a periodic character to the movement. The
main movement of EIC is in direction of eq provoking the hydrodynamic counter force. The movement in the direction of po
is expected to be smaller because po is smaller than eq. The hydrodynamic effect in polar direction is also smaller since there
is no rotational velocity at the pole and therefore no relative velocity. Therefore, the movement in polar direction might be
disproportionately larger than expected. The axial tilt of earth and the direction of at are in the same orientation during a full
rotation such that po aims at the northern pole. Therefore, the polar eccentric movement of EIC is mainly to the northern
hemisphere. The movement in polar direction was already noticed by the analysis of waveform doublets [5]. The author
suggests conducting the analysis of waveform doublets in the axis Colombia – Singapore or similar to me asure the equatorial
movement of EIC.
References:
1.
Goldstein, H., Poole, C., & Safko, L., 2006. Die Bewegung starrer Körper in Abwesenheit von Drehmo menten, in Klassische
Mechanik. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 3rd edn, pp. 214--223
2.
Hengst, R., 2008. Der Einfluss der kontinentalen Wasserspeicherung auf das Rotationsverhalten der Erde. Dissertation,
Geod ätisches Institut der Universität Stuttgart, St uttgart.
3.
Muhs, D., Wittel, H. & Jannasch, D., 2005. Gleitlager, in Roloff/Matek Maschinenelemente. Verlag: Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn, 17th
edn, pp. 497--538
7
Seidelmann, P., 1980. IAU Theory of Nutation: The final report of the IAU working group of nutation. IAU Symp.
Song, X. & Dai, W., 2008. Topography of Earth ’s inner core boundary from high-quality waveform doublets. Geophys. J. Int.
175, 386--399.
Zhang, J., Song, X. & Li, Y., 2005. Inner Core Differential Motion Confirmed by Earthquake Waveform Doublets. Nature 309,
1357--1360.
4.
5.
6.
|
1805.08888 | 2 | 1805 | 2018-11-13T22:06:50 | KMT-2016-BLG-1107: A New Hollywood-Planet Close/Wide Degeneracy | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | We show that microlensing event KMT-2016-BLG-1107 displays a new type of degeneracy between wide-binary and close-binary Hollywood events in which a giant-star source envelops the planetary caustic. The planetary anomaly takes the form of a smooth, two-day "bump" far out on the falling wing of the light curve, which can be interpreted either as the source completely enveloping a minor-image caustic due to a close companion with mass ratio $q=0.036$, or partially enveloping a major-image caustic due to a wide companion with $q=0.004$. The best estimates of the companion masses are both in the planetary regime ($3.3^{+3.5}_{-1.8}\,M_{\rm jup}$ and $0.090^{+0.096}_{-0.037}\,M_{\rm jup}$) but differ by an even larger factor than the mass ratios due to different inferred host masses. We show that the two solutions can be distinguished by high-resolution imaging at first light on next-generation ("30m") telescopes. We provide analytic guidance to understand the conditions under which this new type of degeneracy can appear. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | KMT-2016-BLG-1107: A New Hollywood-Planet Close/Wide
Degeneracy
Kyu-Ha Hwang1, Yoon-Hyun Ryu1, Hyoun-Woo Kim1, Michael D.Albrow2,
Sun-Ju Chung1,3, Andrew Gould1,4,5, Cheongho Han6, Youn Kil Jung1, In-Gu
Shin7, Yossi Shvartzvald8,9, Jennifer C. Yee7, Weicheng Zang10, Sang-Mok
Cha1,11, Dong-Jin Kim1, Seung-Lee Kim1,3, Chung-Uk Lee1,3, Dong-Joo Lee1,
Yongseok Lee1,11, Byeong-Gon Park1,3, Richard W. Pogge5
1Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, Daejon 34055, Korea
2University of Canterbury, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Private Bag 4800,
Christchurch 8020, New Zealand
3Korea University of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34113, Korea
4Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy, Konigstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
5Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University, 140 W. 18th Ave., Columbus, OH
43210, USA
6Department of Physics, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea
7 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138,
USA
8IPAC, Mail Code 100-22, Caltech, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
9NASA Postdoctoral Program Fellow
10Physics Department and Tsinghua Centre for Astrophysics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
100084, China
11School of Space Research, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Kyeonggi 17104, Korea
8
1
0
2
v
o
N
3
1
.
]
P
E
h
p
-
o
r
t
s
a
[
2
v
8
8
8
8
0
.
5
0
8
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
ABSTRACT
We show that microlensing event KMT-2016-BLG-1107 displays a new type
of degeneracy between wide-binary and close-binary Hollywood events in which a
giant-star source envelops the planetary caustic. The planetary anomaly takes the
form of a smooth, two-day "bump" far out on the falling wing of the light curve,
which can be interpreted either as the source completely enveloping a minor-
image caustic due to a close companion with mass ratio q = 0.036, or partially
-- 2 --
−1.8 Mjup and 0.090+0.096
enveloping a major-image caustic due to a wide companion with q = 0.004.
The best estimates of the companion masses are both in the planetary regime
(3.3+3.5
−0.037 Mjup) but differ by an even larger factor than the
mass ratios due to different inferred host masses. We show that the two solutions
can be distinguished by high-resolution imaging at first light on next-generation
("30m") telescopes. We provide analytic guidance to understand the conditions
under which this new type of degeneracy can appear.
Subject headings: gravitational lensing: micro
1.
Introduction
Gould (1997) proposed a "Hollywood" strategy of searching for microlensing planets
by "following the big stars", which made use of the fact that planets normally betray their
presence in microlensing events when the source star passes over, or very close to, a caustic
generated by the planet. For low-mass planets (hence, small caustics), the probability for
the source to pass over the caustic is therefore proportional to the size of the source, rather
than of the much smaller caustic. Gould & Gaucherel (1997) showed that for "wide" (s > 1)
topologies, the excess magnification ∆A (relative to the case of a point lens without planetary
companions) when the source fully envelops the caustic is
∆A →
2q
ρ2 =
2mpθ2
E
Mθ2
∗
,
(1)
i.e., exactly the same value as would be the case if the planet were isolated. Here, q = mp/M
is the planet-host mass ratio, s is the planet-host separation normalized to the Einstein radius
θE, ρ = θ∗/θE, θ∗ is the angular source radius,
θE = pκMπrel;
4G
c2AU ≃ 8.14
mas
M⊙
,
κ ≡
(2)
and πrel = AU(D−1
detectability of, e.g., ∆A & 0.1, then we can rewrite Equation (1) as
S ) is the lens-source relative parallax. If we adopt a threshold of
L − D−1
mp =
θ2
∗∆A
2 κπrel
& 0.75M⊕(cid:16) θ∗
6 µas(cid:17)2(cid:16) πrel
0.1 mas(cid:17)−1
,
(3)
where we have normalized to the angular source size of a typical clump giant and to the
relative parallax of a typical disk lens. Hence, this approach is potentially sensitive to very
low-mass planets, particularly because large stars are also bright (unless they are heavily
extincted), meaning that the photometric precision is generally good.
-- 3 --
The virtue of this approach was first illustrated by OGLE-2005-BLG-390, which was
intensively monitored by the PLANET collaboration, leading to the detection of a q ∼
8 × 10−5 planet, with estimated mass mp ∼ 5 M⊕ (Beaulieu et al. 2006). This was only the
third published planet, and still to this date, one of only seven microlensing planets with
well-measured mass ratios in the range q < 10−4 (Udalski et al. 2018).
Nevertheless, this channel has been the subject of remarkably little systematic study.
The first fundamentally new development was the discovery of a potential degeneracy be-
tween "Cannae" and "von Schlieffen" Hollywood events, in which the source, respectively,
fully and partially envelops the caustic (Hwang et al. 2018).
Here we analyze the Hollywood microlensing event KMT-2016-BLG-1107 and report the
discovery a second potential ("close/wide") degeneracy. Although this degeneracy has a sim-
ilar s ↔ s−1 symmetry to the well-established "close/wide" degeneracy that affects central
caustics (Griest & Safizadeh 1998; Dominik 1999), the two degeneracies are not fundamen-
tally related. We study the general conditions under which this close/wide planetary-caustic
degeneracy can arise and show that (in strong contrast to the close/wide central-caustic de-
generacy), the mass ratios q of the two degenerate solutions generically differ by a relatively
large factor, with the s < 1 solution having a more massive planet. In the present case,
q = 4.0× 10−3 and q = 3.6× 10−2 for the s > 1 and s < 1 solutions, respectively. Finally, we
show that imaging with adaptive optics (AO) cameras will be able to resolve the degeneracy
at first light on next-generation ("30m") telescopes.
2. Observations
KMT-2016-BLG-1107 is at (RA,Dec) = (17:45:40.26,−26:01:54.48) corresponding to
(l, b) = (2.5, 1.5). It was discovered by applying the Korea Microlensing Telescope Network
(KMTNet, Kim et al. 2016) post-season event finder (Kim et al. 2018a) to 2016 KMTNet
data (Kim et al. 2018c). These data were taken on KMTNet's three identical 1.6m telescopes
at CTIO (Chile, KMTC), SAAO (South Africa, KMTS) and SSO (Australia, KMTA), each
equipped with identical 4 deg2 cameras. The event lies in KMTNet field BLG18 with a
nominal cadence of Γ = 1 hr−1. In fact, the cadence was altered from April 23 to June 16
(7501 < HJD′ ≡ HJD−2450000 < 7555) to support the Kepler K2 C9 microlensing campaign
(Gould & Horne 2013; Henderson et al. 2016; Kim et al. 2018b). During this period, the
cadence was reduced to Γ = 0.75 hr−1 for KMTS and KMTA, but remained at Γ = 1 hr−1
for KMTC. We note that KMTC data are affected by a bad column on the CCD and so
often have significantly larger error bars than KMTS and KMTA data.
-- 4 --
The great majority of observations were carried out in the I band with occasional V -
band observations made solely to determine source colors. All reductions for the light curve
analysis were conducted using the pySIS implementation (Albrow et al. 2009) of difference
image analysis (DIA, Alard & Lupton 1998). While the V -band data are sufficient to mea-
sure the color (Section 4), because the source is very red and there are many fewer V -band
points than I-band, the V -band data do not place significant constraints on the modeling.
Thus, we do not use them in the modeling.
2.1. Removal of Long-Term Trend
The raw light curve shows a long-term trend in the combined 2016-2018 data. See
Figure 1. The origin of this trend is unknown. It could, for example, be due to blended light
from a relatively high-proper-motion nearby star. Whatever the cause, it is almost certainly
unrelated to the primary microlensing event or the additional "bump" in the lightcurve. We
therefore fit the baseline of the light curve to a constant plus a slope and remove the slope
(see Figure 1) before undertaking the microlensing analysis.
3. Light Curve Analysis
The resulting light curve of KMT-2016-BLG-1107 in the neighborhood of the event
It primarily takes the form of a standard Paczy´nski (1986) single-
is shown in Figure 2.
lens/single-source (1L1S) curve, which is characterized by three geometric parameters (t0, u0, tE).
These are, respectively, the time of maximum, the impact parameter (normalized to θE), and
the Einstein timescale,
,
(4)
tE ≡
θE
µrel
where µrel is the lens-source relative proper motion.
However, in addition there is a small, short-lived "bump" on the falling wing of the light
curve at HJD′ ≃ 7557. This appearance is qualitatively similar to the classic Hollywood
event, OGLE-2005-BLG-390 (Beaulieu et al. 2006), and so plausibly could be generated
by a similar major-image (s > 1) caustic that is fully enveloped by the source. To test this
conjecture, we conduct a systematic grid search over the seven standard parameters of binary-
lens/single-source (2L1S) events. There are the three Paczy´nski (1986) parameters just
mentioned (t0, u0, tE), the three parameters mentioned in Section 1, (s, q, ρ), and the angle
α between the binary axis and the direction of lens-source relative motion µrel. In addition
to these geometric parameters, there are two flux parameters (fs, fb) for each observatory, i,
-- 5 --
so that the observed fluxes Fi(t) are modeled by
Fi(t) = fs,iA(t; t0, u0, tE, ρ, s, q, α) + fb,i.
(5)
3.1. Two Solutions: Wide and Close Planetary Companions
We employ Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) χ2 minimization to carry out a grid
search, in which (t0, u0, tE, ρ, α) are allowed to vary, while (s, q) are held fixed. The chains
are seeded with (t0, u0, tE) derived from an initial Paczy´nski (1986) fit and ρ = 0.04 based
on the relative duration of the two bumps. For each (s, q), α is seeded at six values that are
spaced uniformly around the unit circle.
The grid search yields only two minima whose geometries are shown in Figures 3 and
4. In both cases, the source passes over a small planetary caustic that lies far from the lens.
For the solution with s < 1, there are two such caustics, so we also check for a solution that
crosses over the caustic at (xs, ys) ∼ (−2.4, 1.0). This solution is disfavored by ∆χ2 ∼ 140
of which ∆χ2 ∼ 50 comes from the rising side of the light curve, when the source is forced
to cross the "de-magnified zone" even though no such demagnification is seen in the light
curve. Furthermore, this solution has severe negative blending that makes it unphysical.
We further refine the two good solutions with additional MCMC runs, in which all seven
parameters are allowed to vary. These two solutions are shown in Table 1. The flux values
are quoted for the KMTC dataset. We note first that the Paczy´nski (1986) parameters
(t0, u0, tE) are essentially identical between the two solutions. This is consistent with the
fact that the light curve morphology is dominated by a broad bump that is generated by the
host. Similarly, the flux parameters (fs, fb) are also essentially identical.1
Next we note that the two values of s, (0.345 and 2.96), almost perfectly obey s ↔ s−1.
The Paczy´nski (1986) curve is generated by two images, which lie at u± = (u ± √u2 + 4)/2,
where u is the projected lens-source separation normalized to θE.
If the planet lies near
either image, s ∼ u±, then it will perturb the image, giving rise to a short-lived deviation.
Because u− = −u−1
+ , it follows immediately that planetary deviations for close and wide
solutions should be related by s ↔ s−1.
The values of α differ substantially, but this mainly reflects that the major and minor
images (and so any planet perturbing these images) lie on opposite sides of the host lens.
In the limit q ≪ 1, one expects α ↔ π − α from this effect alone. However, this symmetry
1The flux system is defined so that I = 18 − 2.5 log10 fx.
-- 6 --
is broken at finite q because the major-image caustic always lies directly on the binary axis
whereas the two minor-image caustics are displaced from the axis by an angle that increases
with q (Han 2006). These effects are apparent from examination of the caustic geometries,
Figures 3 and 4.
The two really important differences between these solutions are in q and ρ. The mass
ratio q is almost 10 times larger in the close solution while the normalized source size is more
than three times smaller. Some insight into these differences is provided by Figures 3 and 4,
which show the geometries of the two solutions.
In the close solution, the short-lived bump is caused by the complete ("Cannae") en-
velopment of one of the two triangular caustics associated with minor-image perturbations,
while in the wide solution it is caused by the partial ("von Schlieffen") envelopment of the
quadrilateral planetary caustic associated with major-image perturbations.
In the latter
geometry, the duration of the bump (which is an observed feature of the light curve) is sub-
stantially shorter than the diameter crossing time of the source, which immediately implies
that the normalized source size must be substantially bigger than for the s < 1 von Schlieffen
solution.
3.2. Apparent Preference for Close Solution Is Not Real
wide − χ2
We note that the close solution is nominally preferred by ∆χ2 ≃ 40. Under most
circumstances, we would regard this as strong evidence in its favor. However, one can see
from Figure 2 that the two models hardly differ, particularly compared to the error bars,
which are relatively large (∼ 0.006 mag for KMTS). We have investigated the origin of
this apparently strong χ2 difference by constructing the cumulative distribution function of
∆χ2 = χ2
close as a function of time, and we find that most of the "signal" comes
from 7565 . HJD′ . 7585, i.e., when τ ≡ (t − t0)/tE is 3 -- 4 Einstein timescales past peak.
During this interval, the lightcurve is, on average, several σ below either model. Under
such conditions, ∆χ2 ≃ 2 (δ/σ)((∆/σ) where δ is the difference between the models, ∆
is the difference between the data and the mean of the two models, and σ is the error
bar. That is, for ∆/σ ∼ 2.5, we have ∆χ2 = 5(δ/σ).
In this way, many tens of points
each contribute ∆χ2 ∼ 0.5 even though the precision of the data does not permit them to
distinguish between models.
Inspecting the residuals in Figure 2, we see that they show
irregular variability with an amplitude ∼ 0.02 mag and a timescale of ∼ 20 days. Hence,
we conclude that the apparent preference of the data for the close solution is an artifact of
this low-level variability, i.e., that a degeneracy persists between the close and wide solutions
(both are acceptable solutions) despite a difference in chi2.
-- 7 --
3.3. Binary-Source Solution Excluded
Short-lived smooth bumps can be generated by single-lens/binary-source (1L2S) events
(Gaudi 1998). In particular, if the secondary source is substantially fainter than the primary
and passes much closer to the lens, the resulting light curve can mimic a 2L1S planetary
event quite well. We search for binary source solutions, but find that they are disfavored by
∆χ2 > 100. See Table 1 in which qF , I indicates the flux ratio of the two sources. While some
of this signal may come from long-term variability (see Section 3.2), the 1L2S model clearly
fails to match the data (particular KMTS) on the rising side of the bump. See Figure 2.
This short-term failure cannot be explained by long-term variability. Hence, we consider
that the 1L2S model is excluded.
4. Angular Source Radius: θ∗
The evaluation of the angular source radius θ∗ is generally important in microlensing
events because it leads to the measurement of the angular Einstein radius and the lens-source
relative proper motion
θE =
;
µrel =
,
(6)
θ∗
ρ
θE
tE
which can help physically characterize the lens, usually by evaluating the prior probabilities
of these values within the context of a Galactic model (e.g., Han & Gould 1995).
However, in the present case, the evaluation of θ∗ is of even more fundamental impor-
tance. This is because the two degenerate solutions identified in Section 3.1, which have
radically different mass ratios q, also predict radically different proper motions µrel. This
means that by evaluating θ∗ (and so, via Equation (6), µrel), we can lay the basis for dis-
tinguishing between the two solutions by future high-resolution imaging. In particular, we
note from Table 1 that the two solutions have similar source fluxes fs and similar Einstein
timescales tE. As we will see below, similar source fluxes imply similar θ∗. Then, from
Equation (6), the two solutions will be in the relations
µrel,s<1
µrel,s>1 ≃
θE,s<1
θE,s>1 ≃
ρs>1
ρs<1 ≃ 3.09 ± 0.54.
(7)
Hence, the two solutions are very well separated in their relative predictions for the proper
motion. The question then is how well the absolute proper motion can be predicted. This
in turn basically depends on how well θ∗ can be measured.
We follow the usual approach of measuring the offset of the source color and magnitude
from those of the clump centroid (Yoo et al. 2004). The main additional subtlety is that, as
-- 8 --
discussed in Section 2.1, the light curve shows a long-term trend in the baseline magnitude
dI/dt ∼ 0.018 ± 0.003 mag yr−1.
In order to measure the offset of the source from the clump, we must carry out the
lightcurve photometry in a common system with the field stars. For this purpose we use
pyDIA, i.e., a different package from pySIS, which is used for the main light-curve analysis. In
our initial treatment we apply the slope-removal correction derived from the pySIS analysis
to both the I-band and V -band photometry files derived from pyDIA.
In 2016, KMTNet took V -band data from both KMTC and KMTS, with relative V /I
cadences of 1/10 and 1/20, respectively. In addition, as mentioned in Section 2, the KMTS
overall cadence was reduced by 25% during most of the event. Therefore, there are roughly
2.5 times more V -band images from KMTC compared to KMTS over the relevant portions
of the light curve. However, as also mentioned in Section 2, the KMTC data were adversely
affected by a bad column, leading to the loss of many points and the degradation of some of
those remaining. Hence, we can expect that both data sets will contribute roughly equally
to the measurement of θ∗ and so analyze both.
We report first the details of the KMTC measurements and then summarize those from
KMTS. We find the instrumental [(V −I), I] pyDIA positions of the red clump (see Figure 5),
(8)
[(V − I), I]cl,pyDIA,KMTC = (2.42, 13.97) ± (0.02, 0.04),
and of the source star (by aligning the pyDIA light curves to the best-fitting model,
[(V − I), I]s,pyDIA,KMTC = (2.76, 13.72) ± (0.05, 0.01).
(9)
The offset is therefore ∆[(V − I), I]KMTC = (0.34,−0.25) ± (0.06, 0.04). Following the same
procedure for KMTS, we obtain [(V − I), I]cl,pyDIA,KMTS = (1.60, 14.84) ± (0.02, 0.04), [(V −
I), I]s,pyDIA,KMTS = (1.89, 14.66) ± (0.07, 0.01), and ∆[(V − I), I]KMTS = (0.29,−0.18) ±
(0.07, 0.04). The difference between these two determination has χ2 = 1.8 for 2 dof, i.e.,
perfectly consistent. We therefore combine the two measurements to obtain,
∆[(V − I), I] = (0.32,−0.22) ± (0.05, 0.03).
(10)
We adopt [(V −I), I]0,cl = (1.06, 14.36) from Bensby et al. (2013) and Nataf et al. (2013)
(for l = 2.5), and so
[(V − I), I]0,s = (1.38, 14.14) ± (0.07, 0.15).
(11)
We note that both of the error bars in Equation (11) are larger than those in Equation (10).
For the color, we have added in quadrature 0.05 mag as an estimate of the error in the method,
-- 9 --
which we derive from the scatter in the difference between spectroscopic and photometric
color estimates in Bensby et al. (2013). For the magnitude, we add in quadrature a 0.14
error due to the fractional uncertainty in fs in Table 1.
Using the V IK relation of Bessell & Brett (1988) to convert from V /I to V /K and the
color/surface-brightness relation of Kervella et al. (2004), we finally derive,
θ∗ = 8.83 ± 0.73 µas.
(12)
The main concern regarding systematic errors in this evaluation is that the V -band data
are too noisy to allow us to independently measure their baseline slope. More precisely, we
find that the slope is consistent with the I-band slope, but with an error that is twice as
large as the value of the I-band slope. Because we do not know the origin of this slope, it
could in principle be substantially different in the two bands. As a relatively conservative
estimate of the impact of this systematic error, we consider two fairly extreme cases: first
that the V -band baseline is flat, i.e., dV /dt = 0 and second that it is twice the I-band slope,
i.e., dV /dt = 0.036 mag yr−1. However, we find that even these changes in assumed slope
result in a change in source color of only 0.01 mag, which would result in a change of θ∗ that
is more than an order of magnitude smaller than the error bar in Equation (12). Hence, this
potential source of systematic error has no practical impact. The underlying reason for this
is that we evaluate the source flux only using data from a symmetric interval around the
peak during which the source is significantly magnified. Because the lightcurve is basically
symmetric, while the slope function is anti-symmetric, we expect very little effect. Indeed,
it is only because the data sampling is higher on the falling wing of the light curve (because
of longer visibility during each night) that there is any effect at all.
Finally, we estimate θE and µrel for the two solutions.
θE = 0.148 ± 0.021 mas;
θE = 0.048 ± 0.007 mas;
µrel = 2.65 ± 0.38 mas yr−1;
µrel = 0.85 ± 0.13 mas yr−1;
(s < 1),
(s > 1).
(13)
(14)
Because of the low values of µrel for both solutions, resolution of this degeneracy will
require the advent of adaptive optics on next generation ("30m") telescopes. To evaluate
these prospects, we begin by recalling the experience of Batista et al. (2015), who separately
resolved the roughly equally-bright source and lens for OGLE-2005-BLG-169 in H-band
(1.65 µm) using the 10m Keck telescope, at a time when these were separated by 60 mas,
i.e., about 1.5 FWHM. Considering that the source is a red giant in the present case, and
therefore likely to be 100-1000 times brighter than the lens, we expect that the minimum
separation is likely 1/3 larger, i.e., 2.0 FWHM. For the European Extremely Large Telescope
-- 10 --
39m telescope in J band (the most optimistic case), this would imply a minimum separation
of 14 mas. For an estimated E-ELT AO first light of 2028, this requirement would be satisfied
by more than a factor 2 for the (s < 1) solution, although it would be only marginally
satisfied for the (s > 1) solution. Therefore, there are reasonable prospects for resolving this
degeneracy at AO first light.
5. Bayesian Analysis
Because the planet-host mass ratio q differs by almost a decade between two solutions
that are not distinguishable based on current data, we cannot give even a relatively precise
estimate of the planet mass based on a Bayesian analysis. Moreover, if future AO obser-
vations (Section 4) do distinguish between the two solutions, there would be no need for a
Bayesian analysis because the host mass and distance will be much better constrained by the
measurements of θE and of the host flux that derive from those observations. Nevertheless,
for completeness we carry out a Bayesian analysis to estimate the host mass and distance for
each of the two degenerate solutions. We employ the same procedures and Galactic model
as did Jung et al. (2018).
The results are illustrated in Figure 6 and summarized in Table 2. For both solutions, the
small values of the Einstein radius (Equations (13) and (14)) strongly favor low-mass lenses,
while the low proper motions favor Galactic-bulge lenses. In both cases, the effect is substan-
tially stronger for the s > 1 solution. Also note that even for the close solution, the planet's
projected separation from its host is relatively large for its mass, a⊥/M ∼ 3.9 AU/M⊙. This
would be outside the snowline for a conventional scaling, asnow = 2.7 (M/M⊙) AU.
According to Figure 6, there is a roughly 40% probability that the lens will be below
the hydrogen burning limit (and hence, likely invisible) even if the s < 1 solution is correct.
This means that if future AO observations fail to detect the host, then we will not be able
to determine whether the close or wide solution is correct: all we will know is that the host
is a brown dwarf.
6. Discussion: Major/Minor Image Hollywood Degeneracy
6.1. Allowed Range of s for Minor-Image Hollywood Events
When Gould & Gaucherel (1997) derived Equation (1) for the excess magnification
∆A → 2q/ρ2 generated by a completely enveloped major-image planetary caustic, they
-- 11 --
also derived ∆A → 0 for a completely enveloped minor-image planetary caustic. Clearly,
this formula fails in the present case, for which the s < 1 solution has a "bump" that looks
qualitatively similar to classical major-image Hollywood Cannae "bumps". This is because
the Gould & Gaucherel (1997) analytic result implicitly assumed that the source envelops
the entire minor-image caustic structure, including both triangular caustics and the trough
that lies between them. In the present case, by contrast, the bump is generated by pass-
ing over one of the two triangular caustics, with the source well separated from the other
triangular caustic and also from the trough that lies between them.
Hence, the first question to address is: under what conditions can the source completely
envelop one triangular caustic and still be well separated from the trough. To address this
question, we make use of the analytic results from Han (2006), which are derived in the limit
q ≪ 1. Han (2006) finds that the length of the planetary caustic (along the direction of the
binary axis) is
∆ξc
2 → (cid:16) 27
16(cid:17)1/2√qs3,
while the separation of the center of the caustic from the binary axis is
√q
s
ηc,0 ≃
[(1 + s2)−1/2 + (1 − s2)1/2] →
√q
s
(2 − s2)
(15)
(16)
Hence, the ratio of the distance of the caustic from the binary axis to its "size" is independent
of q,
(17)
R ≡
ηc,0
∆ξc/2
s4
= (cid:16) 16
27(cid:17)1/2 2 − s2
Thus, for s = (0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8), we have R = (55, 22, 10, 4.8, 2.6). Based on this analy-
sis, we conclude that there can be minor-image "Hollywood" type bumps without obvious
deviations due to the trough only if s . 0.7.
Another way of stating this result is that a symmetric bump at normalized Einstein-
radius position uperturb & 0.7 can potentially be explained by either a major-image (s > 1)
or minor-image (s < 1) Hollywood solution. On the other hand, for uperturb . 0.7, only
major-image Hollywood solutions are viable.
In the present case, s = 0.345 or s = 2.96, i.e., uperturb ≃ 2.6, we are well into the regime
of possible degeneracy between major-image and minor-image Hollywood events.
We note, however, that while uperturb & 0.7 is a necessary condition, it is not sufficient.
It is also necessary that the perturbation occur on the wing (rising or falling) of the light
curve rather than near the peak. That is, if the source crosses one triangular caustic near
peak, then it will also come close to the other one and will cross the pronounced "dip" in
between. These features will be easily recognized in the light curve. In the present case,
-- 12 --
the anomaly is far into the wing of the light curve and (in the s < 1 model) the source
trajectory runs nearly parallel (α = π + 0.11) to the binary axis and so essentially never
transits the "dip". See Figure 3. Given less than perfect data, such an extreme geometry is
not absolutely required to avoid detection of the dip, but this consideration does generally
favor larger uperturb to enable an "effective degeneracy."
6.2. ∆a: Ratio of q for Major-image to Minor-image Solutions
Gould & Gaucherel (1997) gave an analytic formula (Equation (1)) for the excess mag-
nification ∆A of Cannae Hollywood events as a function of q and ρ. For minor-image
Hollywood events there is no such analytic formula, but we can use Equation (1) as a con-
venient way to normalize ∆A to make a numerical study of this effect. That is, we define
∆a as a normalized ∆A,
∆a ≡
ρ2
2q
∆A.
(18)
In Figure 7, we evaluate ∆a for source stars centered on a minor-image caustic of
geometries (s, q), where we fix q = 1× 10−3 and consider values of s = (0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8).
In each case, we evaluate ∆a for values of ρ parametrized by ρ, i.e., ρ normalized to the
caustic size:
ρ
,
(19)
ρ ≡
∆ξc(s, q)/2
where ∆ξc(s, q) is given by Equation (15). In each case, we mark for reference the value of ρ
for which ρ = √q. This value of ρ is relevant for the comparison to major-image Hollywood
geometries because for the major-image case, ρ > √q =⇒ ∆a → 1.
Figure 7 shows that, particularly for s . 0.5 (i.e., the regime in which degeneracies are
likely to be an issue according to the analysis of Section 6.1), ∆a never rises much above 0.1,
i.e., at least an order of magnitude smaller than for the generic major-image case. Hence,
according to Equation (18), and assuming similar values of ρ, much larger values of q are
required to generate a given amplitude of "bump" for minor-image Cannae envelopment
compared to major-image Cannae envelopment.
As we have seen for the case of KMT-2016-BLG-1107, the inferred values of ρ are
not in fact necessarily the same for the major-image and minor-image solutions. The two
solutions must produce the same duration "bump", but they might achieve this by the
caustic traversing different chords through the source, or (as in the present case) by one
solution being Cannae and the other von Schlieffen. Nevertheless, Figure 7 indicates an
overall tendency toward higher q for the close (s < 1) solution, a tendency that is in fact
-- 13 --
realized in the present case.
6.3. Future Prospects for the Major/Minor Image Hollywood Degeneracy
The short, smooth bump experienced by KMT-2016-BLG-1107 2.5 Einstein crossing
times after peak makes it similar in some respects to OGLE-2008-BLG-092 (Poleski et al.
2014), MOA-2012-BLG-006 (Poleski et al. 2017), and MOA-2013-BLG-605 (Sumi et al. 2016).
These had uperturb = 4.87, uperturb = 4.18, and uperturb = 1.91 respectively. That is the first
two were even further into the wing of the light curve than KMT-2016-BLG-1107, while
the last had a comparable value. However, in contrast to KMT-2016-BLG-1107, all three
of these earlier events were unambiguously interpreted as having major-image perturbations
and, therefore, very wide companions. For MOA-2012-BLG-006 and MOA-2013-BLG-605,
this was facilitated by the relatively small source size (ρ/√q = 0.09 and 0.2, respectively),
of the same order as the caustic, which induced some structure on the planetary bump.
As noted by Poleski et al. (2014, 2017), events of this type provide a unique probe of very
wide separation planets ("Uranus" and "Neptune" analogs), provided of course that they
can be unambiguously interpreted as due to very wide (rather than very close) separation
companions.
The KMTNet survey is well-suited to detect more events of this type. The radius cross-
ing time of typical giant sources with θ∗ ∼ 6 µas, is t∗ = 13 hr(µrel/[4 mas yr−1]). Thus, in
the 41 deg2 that are observed at cadences Γ ≥ 1 hr−1 (like BLG18), Hollywood perturba-
tions should be covered very well (weather permitting). Even the additional 44 deg2 that
are observed at Γ ≥ 0.4 hr−1 should yield adequate coverage in many cases. However, more
practical experience will be required to determine how often such detections are impacted
by degeneracies, and under what conditions these can be resolved.
Work by AG was supported by AST-1516842 from the US NSF. IGS and AG were sup-
ported by JPL grant 1500811. Work by C.H. was supported by the grant (2017R1A4A1015178)
of National Research Foundation of Korea. This research has made use of the KMTNet sys-
tem operated by the Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute (KASI) and the data
were obtained at three host sites of CTIO in Chile, SAAO in South Africa, and SSO in
Australia.
-- 14 --
Table 1. Best-fit solutions
Parameters
s < 1
s > 1
1L2S
χ2/dof
t0 (HJD′)
u0
tE (days)
s
q (10−2)
α (rad)
ρ (10−2)
t0,2 (HJD′)
u0,2
ρ2 (10−2)
qF,I (10−3)
fs
fb
t∗ (days)
teff (days)
3894.913/3895
7508.681 ± 0.068
0.927 ± 0.061
20.403 ± 0.875
0.345 ± 0.013
3.614 ± 0.544
3.132 ± 0.025
5.955 ± 0.683
...
...
...
...
3936.813/3895
7509.227 ± 0.057
0.932 ± 0.057
20.380 ± 0.805
2.965 ± 0.104
0.398 ± 0.059
0.441 ± 0.012
18.411 ± 2.423
...
...
...
...
4.065 ± 0.536
-0.439 ± 0.536
1.215 ± 0.124
18.919 ± 0.445
4.201 ± 0.522
-0.575 ± 0.522
3.752 ± 0.394
18.987 ± 0.415
4045.87/3895
7509.034 ± 0.054
0.913 ± 0.068
20.818 ± 0.974
...
...
...
...
7557.049 ± 0.064
0.027 ± 0.013
6.417 ± 0.877
2.760 ± 0.306
3.977 ± 0.622
-0.351 ± 0.622
...
...
Table 2. Physical properties
Quantity
s < 1
s > 1
Mhost [M⊙]
Mplanet [MJ ]
DL [kpc]
a⊥ [au]
0.087+0.092
−0.049
3.283+3.468
−1.835
6.651+0.948
−1.348
0.342+0.070
−0.085
0.022+0.023
−0.009
0.090+0.096
−0.037
7.481+0.748
−0.708
1.065+0.192
−0.189
-- 15 --
REFERENCES
Alard, C. & Lupton, R.H.,1998, ApJ, 503, 325
Albrow, M. D., Horne, K., Bramich, D. M., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 397, 2099
Batista, V., Beaulieu, J.-P., Bennett, D.P., et al. 2015, ApJ, 808, 170
Beaulieu, J.-P. Bennett, D.P., Fouqu´e, P. et al. 2006, Nature, 439, 437
Bensby, T. Yee, J.C., Feltzing, S. et al. 2013, A&A, 549A, 147
Bessell, M.S., & Brett, J.M. 1988, PASP, 100, 1134
Dominik, M. 1999, A&A, 349, 108
Gaudi, B.S. 1998, ApJ, 506, 533
Gould, A. 1997, The Hollywood Strategy for Microlensing Detection of Planets, in Variables
Stars and the Astrophysical Returns of the Microlensing Surveys. Eds. R. Ferlet, J.-P.
Maillard and B. Raban. Gif-sur-Yvette, France : Editions Frontieres, p.125
Gould, A. & Gaucherel. 1997, ApJ, 477, 580
Gould, A. & Horne, K. 2013, ApJ, 779, L28
Griest, K. & Safizadeh, N. 1998, ApJ, 500, 37
Han, C. & Gould, A. 1995, ApJ, 447, 53
Han, C. 2006, ApJ, 638, 1080
Henderson, C.B., Poleski, R., Penny, M. et al. 2016 PASP, 128, 124401
Hwang, K.-H., Udalski, A., Shvartzvald, Y. et al. 2018, AJ, 155, 20
Jung, Y. K., Udalski, A., Gould, A., et al. 2018 AJ, 155, 219
Kervella, P., Th´evenin, F., Di Folco, E., & S´egransan, D. 2004, A&A, 426, 297
Kim, S.-L., Lee, C.-U., Park, B.-G., et al. 2016, JKAS, 49, 37
Kim, D.-J., Kim, H.-W., Hwang, K.-H., et al., 2018a, AJ, 155, 76
Kim, H.-W., Hwang, K.-H., Kim, D.-J., et al., 2018b, AJ, 155, 186
Kim, H.-W., Hwang, K.-H., Kim, D.-J., et al., 2018c, AAS submitted, arXiv:1804.03352
-- 16 --
Nataf, D.M., Gould, A., Fouqu´e, P. et al. 2013, ApJ, 769, 88
Paczy´nski, B. 1986, ApJ, 304, 1
Poleski, R., Skowron, J., Udalski, A., et al. 2014, ApJ, 755, 42
Poleski, R., Udalski, A., Bond, I.A., et al. 2017, A&A, 604A, 103
Sumi, T., Udalski, A., Bennett, D.P., et al. 2016 ApJ, 825, 112
Udalski, A., Ryu, Y.-H., Sajadian, S., et al. 2018, Acta Astron., 68, 1
Yoo, J., DePoy, D.L., Gal-Yam, A. et al. 2004, ApJ, 603, 139
This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2.
-- 17 --
Fig. 1. -- KMTC light curve of KMT-2016-BLG-1107 before (upper panel) and after (lower
panel) removal of a linear trend in the baseline flux, which corresponds to dIbase/dt =
+0.018 mag yr−1. The fit was done to 2017 data, while the extension to 2018 serves as a
check. The slopes found for KMTA and KMTS are nearly identical.
-- 18 --
Fig. 2. -- KMT-2016-BLG-1107 light curve, together with three models: "close binary lens"
(s < 1, solid black line), "wide binary lens" (s > 1, dashed line) and "binary source" (1L2S,
solid gray line). The upper panels show a zoom around the anomaly, while the lower panels
show the full event. The residuals are calculated relative to the s < 1 model. The 1L2S
model is excluded by its failure to match the data on the rising wing of the anomaly at
HJD′ = 7556.xx as well as its overall high χ2. The close (s < 1) model is preferred by χ2 but
this is an artifact of low-level variability, which depresses the data below either the s < 1 or
s > 1 models by several sigma during the interval 7565 < HJD′ < 7586 during which the
former model predicts very slightly lower magnification.
-- 19 --
Fig. 3. -- Caustic geometry of KMT-2016-BLG-1107, close (s < 1) solution. The upper
panel shows the source trajectory, which grazes the Einstein ring (dashed line) and then
fully envelops the tiny triangular caustic, roughly 2.5 Einstein timescales tE later. This
Cannae-type Hollywood envelopment is shown in greater detail in the lower-panel zoom,
where the source position is shown by circles at the epochs of observations from the three
color-coded observatories. During the time that the caustic passes close to the limb, it spends
more than half a source-diameter-crossing time inside the source. This should be compared
to Figure 4.
-- 20 --
Fig. 4. -- Caustic geometry of KMT-2016-BLG-1107, wide (s > 1) solution. The upper panel
shows the source trajectory, which grazes the Einstein ring (dashed line) and then partially
envelops the small quadrilateral planetary caustic, roughly 2.5 Einstein timescales tE later.
This von Schlieffen-type Hollywood envelopment is shown in greater detail in the lower-panel
zoom, where the source position is shown by circles at the epochs of observations from the
three color-coded observatories. This grazing geometry implies that the normalized source
size ρ must be substantially larger than for the close geometry (compare to Figure 3) in order
to generate a "bump" of similar duration. This implies a substantially lower proper motion
µrel, which will eventually permit future adaptive optics (AO) observations to distinguish
between the two solutions. See Section 4 and, in particular, Equations (13) and (14).
-- 21 --
Fig. 5. -- Color-magnitude diagram (CMD) based on KMTC data from a 100′′ square cen-
tered on KMT-2016-BLG-1107. The source (blue) is more than 0.3 mag redder than the
centroid of the red clump (red), and is also more than 0.2 mag brighter. This offset (con-
firmed also by KMTS data -- not shown), leads to a source-radius estimate θ∗ = 8.8±0.7 mas.
-- 22 --
Fig. 6. -- Bayesian posteriors for KMT-2016-BLG-1107 for the "close" (s < 1, left) and
"wide" (s > 1, right) solutions. For both solutions, the small Einstein radius (θE = 0.15 mas
and θE = 0.05 mas) favors a low-mass lens, particularly for the "wide" solution. Similarly,
the low proper motion (µrel = 2.7 mas yr−1 and µrel = 0.9 mas yr−1) generally favors a bulge
lens, and very strongly so for the "wide" solution.
-- 23 --
Fig. 7. -- Normalized height of minor-image bump ∆a (scaled to the analytic result from
Gould & Gaucherel 1997 for major-image caustics; see Equation (18)) versus normalized
source size ρ (scaled to caustic size, see Equation (19)). This diagram is for q = 10−3, but
other values of q are similar. For each curve, the value of ρ for which ρ = √q is marked
because for major-image caustics, ρ & √q implies ∆a → 1. The low values of ∆a generally
imply that envelopment of minor-image caustics require much larger q to induce the same
size bump compared to major-image caustics.
|
1504.05461 | 2 | 1504 | 2015-04-27T09:14:20 | Asteroid family ages | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | A new family classification, based on a catalog of proper elements with $\sim 384,000$ numbered asteroids and on new methods is available. For the $45$ dynamical families with $>250$ members identified in this classification, we present an attempt to obtain statistically significant ages: we succeeded in computing ages for $37$ collisional families. We used a rigorous method, including a least squares fit of the two sides of a V-shape plot in the proper semimajor axis, inverse diameter plane to determine the corresponding slopes, an advanced error model for the uncertainties of asteroid diameters, an iterative outlier rejection scheme and quality control. The best available Yarkovsky measurement was used to estimate a calibration of the Yarkovsky effect for each family. The results are presented separately for the families originated in fragmentation or cratering events, for the young, compact families and for the truncated, one-sided families. For all the computed ages the corresponding uncertainties are provided. We found 2 cases where two separate dynamical families form together a single V-shape with compatible slopes, thus indicating a single collisional event. We have also found 3 examples of dynamical families containing multiple collisional families, plus a dubious case. We have found 2 cases of families containing a conspicuous subfamily, such that it is possible to measure the slope of a distinct V-shape, thus the age of the secondary collision. We also provide data on the central gaps appearing in some families.
The ages computed in this paper are obtained with a single and uniform methodology, thus the ages of different families can be compared, providing a first example of collisional chronology of the asteroid main belt. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph |
Asteroid family ages
Federica Spotoa,c, Andrea Milania, Zoran Knezevi´cb
aDipartimento di Matematica, Universit`a di Pisa, Largo Pontecorvo 5, 56127 Pisa, Italy
bAstronomical Observatory, Volgina 7, 11060 Belgrade 38, Serbia
cSpaceDyS srl, Via Mario Giuntini 63, 56023 Navacchio di Cascina, Italy
Abstract
A new family classification, based on a catalog of proper elements with
∼ 384, 000 numbered asteroids and on new methods is available. For the 45
dynamical families with > 250 members identified in this classification, we
present an attempt to obtain statistically significant ages: we succeeded in
computing ages for 37 collisional families.
We used a rigorous method, including a least squares fit of the two sides
of a V-shape plot in the proper semimajor axis, inverse diameter plane to
determine the corresponding slopes, an advanced error model for the un-
certainties of asteroid diameters, an iterative outlier rejection scheme and
quality control. The best available Yarkovsky measurement was used to es-
timate a calibration of the Yarkovsky effect for each family. The results are
presented separately for the families originated in fragmentation or cratering
events, for the young, compact families and for the truncated, one-sided fami-
lies. For all the computed ages the corresponding uncertainties are provided,
and the results are discussed and compared with the literature. The ages
of several families have been estimated for the first time, in other cases the
accuracy has been improved. We have been quite successful in computing
ages for old families, we have significant results for both young and ancient,
while we have little, if any, evidence for primordial families. We found 2
cases where two separate dynamical families form together a single V-shape
with compatible slopes, thus indicating a single collisional event. We have
also found 3 examples of dynamical families containing multiple collisional
families, plus a dubious case: for these we have obtained discordant slopes
for the two sides of the V-shape, resulting in distinct ages. We have found 2
Email address: [email protected] (Federica Spoto)
Preprint submitted to Icarus
October 16, 2018
cases of families containing a conspicuous subfamily, such that it is possible
to measure the slope of a distinct V-shape, thus the age of the secondary
collision. We also provide data on the central gaps appearing in some fami-
lies. The ages computed in this paper are obtained with a single and uniform
methodology, thus the ages of different families can be compared, providing
a first example of collisional chronology of the asteroid main belt.
Keywords: Asteroids, dynamics, Impact Processes, Non-gravitational
perturbations, Asteroids, families.
1. Introduction
One of the main purposes for collecting large datasets on asteroid families
is to constrain their ages, that is the epoch of the impact event generating a
collisional family. A collisional family not always coincides with the dynam-
ical family detected by density contrast in the proper elements space. More
complicated cases occur, such as a dynamical family to be decomposed in
two collisional families, or the opposite case in which a collisional family is
split in two density contrast regions by some dynamical instability.
Although other methods are possible, currently the most precise method
to constrain the age of a collisional family (for the ages older than ∼ 10 My)
exploits non-gravitational perturbations, mostly the Yarkovsky effect (Vokrouhlick´y et al.,
2000). These effects generate secular perturbations in the proper elements
of an asteroid which are affected not just by the position in phase space, but
also by the Area/Mass ratio, which is inversely proportional to the asteroid
diameter D. Thus, the main requirements are to have a list of family mem-
bers with a wide range of values in D, enough to detect the differential effect
in the secular drift of the proper elements affecting the shape of the family,
and to have a large enough membership, to obtain statistically significant
results.
Recently Milani et al. (2014) have published a new family classification
by using a large catalog of proper elements (with > 330, 000 numbered aster-
oids) and with a classification method improved with respect to past meth-
ods. This method is an extension of the Hierarchical Clustering Method
(HCM) (Zappal´a et al., 1990), with special provisions to be more efficient in
including large numbers of small objects, while escaping the phenomenon of
chaining. Moreover, the new method includes a feature allowing to (almost)
automatically update the classification when new asteroids are numbered and
2
their proper elements have been computed. This has already been applied to
extend the classification to a source catalog with ∼ 384, 000 proper elements,
In
obtaining a total of ∼ 97, 400 family members (Knezevi´c et al., 2014).
this paper we are going to use the classification of Milani et al. (2014), as
updated by Knezevi´c et al. (2014), and the data are presently available on
AstDyS1.
This updated classification has 21 dynamical families with > 1, 000 mem-
bers and another 24 with > 250 members. The goal of this paper can be
simply stated as to obtain statistically significant age constraints for the ma-
jority of these 45 families. Computing the ages for all would not be a realistic
goal because there are several difficulties. Some families have a very com-
plex structure, for which it is difficult to formulate a model, even with more
than one collision: these cases have required or need dedicated studies. Some
families are affected by particular dynamical conditions, such as orbital reso-
nances with the planets, which result in more complex secular perturbations:
these shall be the subject of continuing work. The results for families with
only a moderate number of members (such as 250 − 300) might have a low
statistical significance.
The age estimation includes several sources of uncertainty which cannot
be ignored. The first source appears in the formal accuracy in the least square
fit used in our family shape estimation methods. The uncertainty depends
upon the noise resulting mostly from the inaccuracy of the estimation of D
from the absolute magnitude H. The second source of error occurs in the
conversion of the inverse slope of the family boundaries into age, requiring
a Yarkovsky calibration: this is fundamentally a relative uncertainty, and in
most cases it represents the largest source of uncertainty in the inferred ages.
In Sec. 4.1 we give an estimate of this uncertainty between 20% and 30%.
As a result of the current large relative uncertainty of the calibration,
we expect that this part of the work will be soon improved, thanks to the
availability of new data. Thus the main result of this paper are the inverse
slopes, because these are derived by using a consistent methodology and
based upon large and comparatively accurate data set. Still we believe we
have done a significant progress with respect to the previous state of the
art by estimating 37 collisional family ages, in many cases providing the
first rigorous age estimate, and in all cases providing an estimated standard
1http://hamilton.dm.unipi.it/astdys/index.php?pc=5
3
deviation. The work can continue to try and extend the estimation to the
cases which we have found challenging.
Since this paper summarizes a complex data processing, with output
needed to fully document our procedures but too large, we decided to in-
clude only the minimum information required to support our analysis and
results. Supplementary material, including both tables and plots, is available
from the web site http://hamilton.dm.unipi.it/astdys2/fam ages/.
2. Least squares fit of the V-shape
Asteroids formed by the same collisional event take the form of a V in the
(proper a - 1/D) plane. The computation of the family ages can be performed
by using this V-shape plots if the family is old enough and the Yarkovsky
effect dominates the spread of proper a, as explained in (Milani et al., 2014,
Sec. 5.2). The key idea is to compute the diameter D from the absolute
magnitude H, assuming a common geometric albedo pv for all the members of
the family. The common geometric albedo is the average value of the known
WISE albedos (Wright et al., 2010; Mainzer et al., 2011) for the asteroids in
the family. Then we use the least squares method to fit the data with two
straight lines, one for the low proper a (IN side) and the other for the high
proper a (OUT side), as in Milani et al. (2014), with an improved outlier
rejection procedure, see (Carpino et al., 2003) and Sec. 2.4.
2.1. Selection of the Fit Region
Most families are bounded on one side or on both sides by resonances.
Almost all these resonances are strong enough to eject most of the family
members that fell into the resonances into unstable orbits.
In these cases
the sides of the V are cut by vertical lines, that is by values of a, which
correspond to the border of the resonance. For each family we have selected
the fit region taking into account the resonances at the family boundaries.
The fit of the slope has to be done for values of 1/D below the intersection of
one of the sides of the V affected by the resonance and the resonance border
value of proper a. In Table 1 we report the values for a and D, and the cause
of each selection.
The cause of each cut in proper a is a mean motion resonance, in most
cases a 2-body resonance with Jupiter, in few cases either a 2-body resonance
with Mars or a 3-body resonance with Jupiter and Saturn. When no reso-
nance with this role has been identified, we use the label FB (for Family Box)
4
Table 1: Fit region: family number and name, explanation of the choice, minimum value
of proper a, minimum value of the diameter selected for the inner and the outer side.
number/
name
158 Koronis
24 Themis
847 Agnia
3395 Jitka
1726 Hoffmeister
668 Dora
434 Hungaria
480 Hansa
808 Merxia
3330 Gantrisch
10955 Harig
293 Brasilia
569 Misa
15124 2000EZ39
1128 Astrid
845 Naema
4 Vesta
15 Eunomia
20 Massalia
10 Hygiea
31 Euphrosyne
3 Juno
163 Erigone
3815 Konig
396 Aeolia
606 Brangane
1547 Nele
18405 1993FY12
170 Maria
93 Minerva
2076 Levin
3827 Zdenekhorsky
1658 Innes
375 Ursula
cause min
min
proper a D IN
7.69
2.82
5/2
25.00
3.075
11/5
4.55
8/3
2.70
FB 2.76
1.33
5.00
2.75
3-1-1
5.88
2.75
3-1-1
1.25
1.87
5/1
2.54
5.00
3/1?
2.50
2.7
8/3
6.67
FB?
3.13
1.43
FB 2.67
5/2
2.83
2.50
3.33
FB 2.62
2.00
FB 2.62
2.22
FB?
2.86
FB 2.91
7/2
2.25
2.50
5.00
2.52
3/1?
1.00
2.33
10/3
7.14
3.07
11/5
11/5
3.07
6.67
2.00
2.62
FB?
2.50
10/3
2.33
2.20
FB 2.56
FB 2.73
1.67
1.67
FB 2.57
1.67
FB 2.64
FB 2.83
2.50
2.755
3/1?
FB 2.71
7/2
8/3
3/1?
2.7
FB 3.1
4.00
2.00
12.50
5-2-2
cause max
min
proper a D OUT
2.96
5.00
7/3
16.67
3.24
2/1
6.67
2.82
5/2
2.82
1.33
5/2
4.00
2.82
5/2
8.33
2.815
5/2
1.25
4/1
2.00
FB 2.71
6.67
2.00
FB 2.80
6.67
3.17
1.82
FB 2.77
FB 2.88
2.00
3.33
FB 2.70
2.50
FB 2.70
2.22
2.82
5/2
5.00
2.96
7/3
3/1
2.50
2.94
5.00
2.71
8/3
0.91
2.50
3/1
7.69
3.25
2/1
2/1
3.25
6.67
2.50
2.70
8/3
2.50
2/1M 2.42
2.20
2.00
1.67
1.67
2.00
4.00
FB 2.585
FB 2.755
FB 2.595
FB 2.648
FB 2.85
FB 2.665
5/2
FB 2.34
1-1C
11/4
2/1
2.645
2.50
2.00
to indicate that the family ends where the HCM procedure does not anymore
detect a significant density contrast (with respect to the local background).
This is affected by the depletion of the proper elements catalog due to the
completeness limit of the surveys: the family may actually contain many
5
smaller asteroids beyond the box limits, but they have not been discovered
yet. On the contrary when the family range in proper a is delimited by strong
resonances, the family members captured in them can be transported far in
proper e (and to a lesser extent in proper sin I) to the point of not being
recognizable as members; over longer time spans, they can be transported to
planet-crossing orbits and removed from the main belt altogether.
The tables in this paper are sorted in the same way: there are four parts,
dedicated to families of the types fragmentation, cratering, young, one-sided;
inside each group the families are sorted by decreasing number of members.
In some cases the tables have been split in four sub-tables, one for each type.
In two cases we have already defined the fit region in such a way that
we can include two families in a single V-shape. This family join is justi-
fied later, in Section 3, by showing that the two dynamical families can be
generated by a single collision. This applies to the join of 10955 with 19466
and to the join of 163 with 5206. Note that the join of two families, justified
by the possibility to fit together in a single V-shape with a common age, is
conceptually different from the merge of two families due to intersections,
discussed in (Milani et al., 2014; Knezevi´c et al., 2014); however, the practi-
cal consequences are the same, namely one family is included in another one
and disappears from the list of families.
For one-sided families we are also indicating the "cause" of the missing
side. E.g., for 2076 the lack of the IN side of the V-shape is due to the 7/2
resonance; on the other hand, the dynamical family 883 could be the contin-
uation of 2076 at proper a lower than the one of the resonance. However, the
V-shape which would be obtained by this join would have two very different
slopes, thus it can be excluded that they are the same collisional family.
For most families the "cause" of the delimitation in proper a, in the sense
above, can be clearly identified. However, some ambiguous cases remain: e.g.,
for family 1128 the outer boundary could be due to the 3-body resonance 3-1-
1 (the three integer coefficients apply to the mean motions of Jupiter, Saturn
and the asteroid, respectively); for family 3 the inner boundary could be due
to 4-3-1. For family 3330 a 3-body resonance (not identified) at a = 3.129
could be the cause of the inner boundary.
For the one-sided family 3827 we do not know the cause of the missing
OUT side, although we suspect it has something to do with (1) Ceres, given
that the proper a of Ceres is very close to the upper limit of the family box.
The family of (3395) Jitka is a subfamily of the dynamical family 847.
The family of (15124) 2000 EZ39 is a subfamily of the dynamical family 569.
6
With 3/1? we are indicating 2 cases (480, 15) in which the families could
be delimited on the IN side by the 3/1 resonance (also 170, 1658 in which
the 3/1 could be the cause of the missing IN side), but the lower bound on
proper a appears too far from the Kirkwood gap. This is a problem which
needs to be investigated.
2.2. Binning and fit of the slopes
Next we divide the 1/D axis into bins, as in Figures 1 and 2. The partition
is done in such a way that each bin contains roughly the same number of
members.
The following points explain the main features of the method used to
create the bins:
1. the maximum number of bins N is selected for each family, depending
upon the number of members of the family;
2. the maximum value of the standard deviation of the number of members
in each bin is decided depending upon the number of members of the
family;
3. the region between 0 and the maximum value of 1/D is divided in N
bins;
4. the difference between the number of members in two consecutive bins
is computed:
4.1 if the difference is less than the standard deviation, the bins are
left as they are;
4.2 if the difference is greater than the standard deviation, the first
bin is divided into smaller bins and then the same procedure is
applied to the new bins.
This procedure is completely automatic, and it is the same both for the inner
and the outer side of a V-shape. In the example of the Figures, namely the
family of (20) Massalia, in the IN side there are 84 bins with a mean of 19
members in each, with a STD of this number 13. In the OUT side there are
82 bins with mean 19 and STD 11.
In the case of the low a side we select the minimum value of proper a and
the corresponding 1/D in each bin, as in Fig. 1. For the other side we select
the maximum value of the proper semimajor axis and the corresponding 1/D,
as in Fig. 2. These are the data to be fit to determine the slopes of the V-
shapes: thus it is important to have enough bins to properly cover the range
in proper a.
7
Family 20
)
m
k
/
1
(
r
e
t
e
m
a
d
i
/
1
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2.34
2.36
2.38
2.4
proper a (au)
2.42
2.44
2.46
2.48
2.5
Figure 1: Blow up of the bins for the inner side of the family of (20) Massalia.
Crosses are the members of the family, points are background asteroids, stars are
affected by the resonances. Circles are members of the family of (20) Massalia
with the minimum value of proper a and the corresponding 1/D in each bin.
2.3. Error Model and Weights
The least squares fit, especially if it includes an outlier rejection proce-
dure, requires the existence of an error model for the values to be fit. Until
now there are no error models for the absolute magnitude and the albedo,
which are available for a large enough catalog of asteroids.
We have built a simple but realistic error model for 1/D computed from
the absolute magnitude H (the formula is D = 1 329 × 10−H/5 × 1/√pv)
by combining the effect of two terms in the error budget: the error in the
absolute magnitude with STD σH and the one in the geometric albedo with
STD σpv . The derivatives of 1/D with respect to these two quantities are:
∂(1/D)
∂H
=
log(10)
5
1
D
×
∂(1/D)
∂pv
= 1
2 × pv! ×
1
D
,
8
Family 20
)
m
k
/
1
(
r
e
t
e
m
a
d
i
/
1
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2.34
2.36
2.38
2.4
proper a (au)
2.42
2.44
2.46
2.48
2.5
Figure 2: Blow up of the bins for the outer side of the family of (20) Massalia.
Circles are members of the family of (20) Massalia with the maximum value of
proper a and the corresponding 1/D in each bin on the left side. Crosses, points
and stars as in Fig. 1.
then the combined error has STD
σ1/D = vuut ∂(1/D)
∂H
σH!2
+ ∂(1/D)
∂pv
σpv!2
.
To compute this error model we need to select three values: 1) the common
geometric albedo pv for all the family members, 2) the dispersion with respect
to this common albedo σpv, 3) the uncertainty in the absolute magnitude σH .
For the first two, we select all the "significant" WISE albedos, that is the
values of the albedos greater than 3 times their standard deviations (with
S/N > 3). Then we cut the tails of this distribution (see Figure 3): pv is the
mean and σpv is the standard deviation of the values of the albedo without
the tails. For the third value σH we use the same for all the families and the
9
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
0.1
Family of 20
0.2
WISE albedos
0.3
0.4
0.5
Figure 3: Histogram of the "significant" WISE albedos for the dynamical family
of (20) Massalia. The vertical lines show the values of the albedos used for the
cut, leaving out values which should correspond to interlopers.
In this and in
many other cases the selection of the interlopers is simple: albedo < 0.1 indicates
C-complex asteroids and > 0.4 values are likely to be affected by large errors.
chosen value is 0.3, see the discussion in (Milani et al., 2014)[Sec. 2.2] and
in (Pravec et al., 2012).
The histograms such as Figure 3 are available for all the families listed in
Table 2 at the Supplementary material web site.
In Table 2 we show the albedo value of the namesake asteroid, with its
uncertainty and the appropriate reference: W for WISE data (Masiero et al.,
2011), I for IRAS, S for (Shepard et al., 2008), and A for AKARI. In some
cases albedo data are not available. The columns 5 and 6 contain the value
of the albedo used for the cut of the tails, and the last two columns are the
mean albedo and the standard deviation.
10
Table 2: Family albedos: number and name of the family, albedo of the parent body with
standard deviation and code of reference, maximum and minimum value for computing
mean, mean and standard deviation of the albedo
number/
name
158 Koronis
24 Themis
847 Agnia
1726 Hoffmeister
668 Dora
434 Hungaria
480 Hansa
808 Merxia
3330 Gantrisch
10955 Harig
293 Brasilia
569 Misa
1128 Astrid
845 Naema
4 Vesta
15 Eunomia
20 Massalia
10 Hygiea
31 Euphrosyne
3 Juno
163 Erigone
3815 Konig
396 Aeolia
606 Brangane
1547 Nele
18405 1993FY12
170 Maria
93 Minerva
2076 Levin
3827 Zdenekhorsky
1658 Innes
375 Ursula
albedo
value
0.144
0.064
0.147
0.036
0.073
0.380
0.249
0.165
0.048
0.033
0.030
0.046
0.072
0.423
0.206
0.210
0.058
0.045
0.238
0.033
0.056
0.139
0.089
0.313
0.160
0.073
0.557
0.104
0.224
0.049
family
largest
STD
0.009 W 0.07
0.016 W
0.012 W 0.10
0.007 W
0.009 W
S
I
ref min max
0.50
0.12
0.40
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.024
0.021 W 0.10
0.010 W
0.45
0.40
0.27
0.10
0.10
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.15
0.10
0.40
0.10
0.15
0.50
0.40
0.12
0.43
0.10
0.15
0.007 W 0.10
0.001
I
0.018 W
0.019 W
0.053
I
0.055 W
0.030
0.08
I
0.005 W 0.02
0.045 W
0.025
I
0.004 W
0.004 W
0.025 W
0.012 W
0.040
0.10
A 0.15
0.10
I
I
0.007
0.10
0.004
0.318 W 0.10
0.008 W
0.037 W 0.10
0.001
A
albedo
mean
0.240
0.069
0.242
0.048
0.058
0.380
0.286
0.248
0.047
0.251
0.174
0.058
0.052
0.065
0.355
0.260
0.249
0.073
0.061
0.253
0.055
0.051
0.106
0.121
0.355
0.184
0.261
0.277
0.202
0.074
0.264
0.062
STD
0.061
0.019
0.056
0.013
0.014
0.100
0.068
0.055
0.012
0.068
0.042
0.016
0.014
0.014
0.099
0.083
0.070
0.022
0.015
0.055
0.013
0.014
0.028
0.028
0.064
0.042
0.084
0.096
0.070
0.020
0.064
0.015
Two discordant results from the albedo analysis of the dynamical families
(93) Minerva and (293) Brasilia are
are easily appreciated from Table 2.
interlopers in the dynamical families for which they are namesake, as shown
by albedo data outside of the family range. Indeed, in the following of this
11
paper we are going to speak of the family 1272 (Gefion) instead of 93, and
of the family 1521 (Seinajoki) instead of 293; both are obtained by removing
interlopers selected because of albedo data, and the namesake is the lowest
numbered after removing the interlopers.
For many families we have proceeded in the same way, that is removing
interlopers clearly indicated by an albedo discordance. The list of these
interlopers for each family is in the Supplementary material.
In some cases we have joined two dynamical families for the purpose
of mean albedo computation: 2076 includes 298, 163 include 5026, 10955
includes 194662. Family 847 includes the subfamily 3395: the same mean
albedo was used for both, although (847) has albedo 0.147 ± 0.01 and (3395)
0.313± 0.05, which are on the opposite side of the mean. Also 569 in Table 2
includes the subfamily 15124.
The family of (434) Hungaria is a difficult case: some WISE data exist
for its family members, but they are of especially poor quality. Thus we have
used for all the albedo derived from radar data (Shepard et al., 2008), and
assumed a quite large dispersion (0.1).
2.4. Outlier Rejection and Quality Control
The algorithm for differential corrections used for the computation of the
slopes includes an automatic outlier rejection scheme, as in (Carpino et al.,
2003). Both the use of an explicit error model for the observations and
the fully automatic outlier rejection procedure are implemented in the free
software OrbFit3 and are used for the orbit determination of the asteroids
included in the NEODyS and AstDyS information systems4. Thus, although
the application of these methods to the computation of family ages is new,
this is a very well established procedure on which we have a lot of experience.
In practice, outlier rejection is performed in an iterative way. At each
iteration, the program computes the residuals of all the observations, their
expected covariance and the corresponding χ2 value. If we can assume that
the observation errors have a normal distribution, to mark an observation
as an outlier we can compare the χ2 value of the post-fit residual with a
threshold value χ2
rej. At each
rej: the observation is discarded if χ2
i > χ2
2However, there is only 1 significant WISE albedo among members of family 19466.
3Distributed at http://adams.dm.unipi.it/orbfit/
4http://newton.dm.unipi.it/neodys/ and http://hamilton.dm.unipi.it/astdys/ respec-
tively.
12
iteration it is also necessary to check if a given observation, that we have
previously marked as an outlier, should be recovered. Therefore, the program
selects an outlier to be recovered if for the non-fitted residual χ2
rec. The
current values for χ2
rec are 10 and 9, respectively.
i < χ2
rej and χ2
During each iteration of the linear regression we compute the residuals,
the outliers, the RMS of the weighted residuals and the Kurtosis of the same
weighted residuals. Our method converges if there is an iteration without
additional outliers. All these data are reported in Table 1 of the Supple-
mentary material. Besides the automatic outlier rejections, some interlopers
have been manually removed when there was a specific evidence that they do
not belong to the collisional family, e.g., based upon WISE data: also these
manual rejections are detailed in the Supplementary material.
3. Results
3.1. Fragmentation Families
The results of the fit for the slopes of the V-shape are described in Table 3
for the families of the fragmentation type. To define fragmentation families,
we have used the (admittedly conventional) definition that the volume of the
family without the largest member has to be more than 12% of the total.
This computation has been done after removing the interlopers (by physical
properties) and the outliers (removed in the fit), and is based on D computed
with the mean albedo pv. Comments for some of the cases are given below.
• For family 158 (Koronis) the values of the inverse slope 1/S on the
two sides are consistent, that is the ratio is within a standard deviation
from 1: this indicates that we are measuring the age of a single event.
The well known subfamily of (832) Karin, with a recent age, does not
affect the slopes.
• Family 24 (Themis) has the well known subfamily of (656) Beagle near
the center of the V-shape, thus it does not affect the slopes. The values
IN and OUT are not the same but the difference has very low statistical
significance. The low accuracy of the IN slope determination is due to
the fact that the 11/5 resonance cuts the V-shape too close to the
center, sharply reducing the useful range in D.
• For family 847 (Agnia) we have estimated also the slopes for the sub-
family 3395. 847 has discordant slope values on the two sides, but the
13
Table 3: Slopes of the V-shape for the fragmentation families: family number/name, num-
ber of dynamical family members, side, slope (S), inverse slope (1/S), standard deviation
of the inverse slope, ratio OUT/IN of 1/S, and standard deviation of the ratio.
number/
name
158 Koronis
24 Themis
847 Agnia
3395 Jitka
1726 Hoffmeister
668 Dora
434 Hungaria
480 Hansa
808 Merxia
3330 Gantrisch
10955 Harig &
19466 Darcydiegel
1521 Seinajoki
569 Misa
15124 2000EZ39
1128 Astrid
845 Naema
no.
members
6130
4329
2395
1560
1233
1187
960
924
723
side
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
IN
517
153 OUT
545
IN
441
436
286
OUT
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
S
1/S
-1.647
1.755
-0.720
0.477
-2.882
4.381
-21.387
21.214
-5.026
5.212
-3.075
3.493
-14.855
15.293
-3.710
3.064
-8.400
8.963
-3.986
3.552
-6.515
5.853
-8.454
23.507
-5.0376
6.5380
-14.422
14.337
-11.339
11.434
-11.715
10.741
-0.608
0.570
-1.390
2.096
-0.347
0.228
-0.047
0.047
-0.199
0.192
-0.325
0.286
-0.067
0.065
-0.270
0.326
-0.119
0.112
-0.251
0.282
-0.154
0.171
-0.118
0.043
-0.199
0.153
-0.069
0.070
-0.088
0.088
-0.085
0.093
1.01
0.96
0.66
1.51
0.94
STD ratio
1/S
0.089
0.069
0.385
0.326
0.072
0.034
0.009
0.008
0.028
0.025
0.053
0.086
0.006
0.003
0.109
0.040
0.010
0.008
0.061
0.075
0.027
0.050
0.023
0.005
0.151
0.052
0.006
0.007
0.006
0.007
0.011
0.004
0.99
1.09
0.97
1.21
1.11
0.36
0.94
1.12
0.88
0.77
1.01
STD
ratio
0.18
0.48
0.17
0.26
0.18
0.30
0.10
0.51
0.10
0.40
0.38
0.08
0.64
0.14
0.10
0.15
OUT one has too few points, being affected by 3395. Thus we consider
as the true value the one obtained on the IN side. 3395 has a very
good fit but with many outliers, which can be explained as members of
847 but not 3395. Anyway the inverse slopes are significantly lower for
14
3395; since the ages are proportional to the inverse slopes, this indicates
an age younger by a factor 7.42 ± 2.06 (based upon the IN values).
• Family 1726 (Hoffmeister) has an especially complicated dynamics on
the IN side, due to both the nonlinear secular resonance g + s− g6 − s6
and the proximity with (1) Ceres, see the discussion in (Milani et al.,
2014)[Sec. 4.1]. However, the results on the two slopes are perfectly
consistent: this is in agreement with what was claimed by Delisle and Laskar
(2012), namely that the Yarkovsky effect prevails over the chaotic ef-
fects induced by close approaches (also by the 1-1 resonance) with
Ceres, in the range of sizes which is relevant for the fit.
• For the family 480 (Hansa) the slope for the IN side has lower quality,
It is a marginal fragmentation with
probably due to 3/1 resonance.
14% of the total volume, excluding (480) Hansa itself.
• Family 808 (Merxia) is a fragmentation with a dominant largest mem-
ber (64% in volume), thus (808) must not be included in the fit.
• For the family 3330 (Gantrisch) it has been difficult to compute a slope
for the IN side, because of the irregular shape of the low a border
resulting in few data to be fit.
• Family 10955 (Harig) can be joined with family 19466: in this way two
one-sided families form a single V-shape: this join is confirmed by the
two slopes being consistent. Thus one collisional family is obtained
from two dynamical families. This merge was already suggested in
(Milani et al., 2014)[Sec. 4.3.2], based on the family box overlap (by
40%).
• Family 1521 (Seinajoki) appears to have two discordant slopes: in the
projection (a, sin I) a bimodality appears in the family shape. We draw
from this the conclusion that there are two collisional families, the one
on the IN side being older.
• The family 569 (Misa) is a marginal fragmentation (fragments account
for 19% of the total volume). The ratio of the IN and OUT slopes is
not significantly different from 1, mostly because of the low accuracy of
the IN value. (15124) 2000 EZ39 appears to be the largest fragment of
a fragmentation subfamily inside the family 569: the inverse slopes are
15
significantly lower, indicating an age younger by a factor 2.19 ± 0.78
with respect to 569 (based upon the OUT values).
3.2. Cratering Families
The results of the fit for the slopes of the V-shape are described in Table 4
for the families of the cratering type, defined by a volume of the family
without the largest member < 12% of the total. Comments for some of the
cases are given below.
Table 4: Slope of the V-shape for the cratering families. Columns as in Table 3.
number/
name
4 Vesta
15 Eunomia
20 Massalia
10 Hygiea
31 Euphrosyne
3 Juno
no.
members
8620
7476
5510
2615
1137
960
side
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
163 Erigone &
5026 Martes
IN
429
380 OUT
S
1/S
-2.983
1.504
-1.398
2.464
-15.062
14.162
-1.327
1.329
-1.338
1.507
-5.261
7.931
-7.045
6.553
-0.335
0.665
-0.715
0.406
-0.066
0.071
-0.754
0.752
-0.747
0.663
-0.190
0.126
-0.142
0.153
1.06
1.98
0.57
STD ratio
1/S
0.040
0.187
0.057
0.020
0.003
0.006
0.079
0.101
0.096
0.081
0.038
0.049
0.035
0.013
1.00
0.89
0.66
1.08
STD
ratio
0.61
0.05
0.10
0.17
0.16
0.29
0.28
• Family 4 (Vesta) has two discordant slopes on the IN and OUT sides.
As already suggested in (Milani et al., 2014)[Sec. 7.2], this should be
interpreted as the effect of two distinct collisional families, with sig-
nificantly different ages. The estimated ratio of the slopes provides a
significant estimate of the ratio of the ages, because the Yarkovsky cali-
bration is common to the two subfamilies, corresponding to two craters
on Vesta.
• Family 15 (Eunomia) has a subfamily which determines the OUT slope,
the ratio of the slopes gives a good estimate of the ratio of the ages, be-
cause of the common calibration. The interpretation as two collisional
families, proposed in (Milani et al., 2014)[Sec. 7.4], is thus confirmed.
16
• Family 10 (Hygiea) has a shape (especially in the proper (a, e) pro-
jection) from which we could suspect two collisional events, but the
IN and OUT slopes not just consistent but very close suggest a single
collision.
Family 163 and 5026
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
)
m
k
/
1
(
r
e
t
e
m
a
d
i
/
1
0
2.33
2.34
2.35
2.36
2.37
proper a (au)
2.38
2.39
2.4
Figure 4: V-shape fit for the join of families of (163) Erigone and (5026) Martes.
The IN slope is fit to members of 163, the OUT slope to members of 5026, but
the two values are consistent. The central depleted region explains why the two
families have no intersection: they are joined but not merged.
• For family 3 (Juno) the IN and OUT slopes are discordant, but due
to the low relative accuracy of the slopes the difference is marginally
significant. The number density as a function of proper a is asymmetric,
more dense on the OUT side.
• Family 163 (Erigone) can be joined with 5026 (Martes), with (163)
as parent body for both (marginally within the cratering definition,
fragments forming 11% of the total volume). This is confirmed by
similar albedo (dark in a region dominated by brighter asteroids) and
by very consistent slopes of the IN side (formed by family 163) and of
the OUT side (formed by 5026), see Figure 4. There is a very prominent
17
gap in the center, which explains why we have found no intersections; it
should be due to the YORP effect; see Section 5.2. Again one collisional
family is obtained from two dynamical families.
3.3. Young Families
We define as young families those with an estimated age of < 100 My;
thus the inverse slopes are much lower than those of the previous tables.
These can be both fragmentations and craterings. The results of the fit are
described in Table 5.
Table 5: Slope of the V-shape for the young families. Columns as in Table 3.
number/
name
3815 Konig
396 Aeolia
606 Brangane
1547 Nele
18405 1993FY12
no.
members
340
306
192
152
102
side
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
S
1/S
-31.892
31.364
-32.358
35.556
-54.027
60.374
-201.336
187.826
-34.189
34.456
-0.031
0.032
-0.031
0.028
-0.019
0.017
-0.005
0.005
-0.029
0.029
STD
1/S
0.004
0.004
0.005
0.005
0.002
0.003
0.0008
0.002
0.01
0.005
ratio
STD
ratio
1.02
0.17
0.91
0.22
0.89
0.17
1.07
0.44
0.99
0.36
These families have a comparatively low number of members, but because
they also have a small range of proper a values a significant slope fit is
possible.
In particular we have introduced the three last families in the
Table with < 250 members.
Few comments: families 396 (Aeolia) and 606 (Brangane) are craterings,
all the others are fragmentations. The family 1547 (Nele) is a marginal
fragmentation, with 19% of volume outside (1547); it is known to be very
young (Nesvorn´y et al., 2003), it has been included to test the applicability
of the V-shape method to recent families (see Sec. 4.2.3).
3.4. One Side
The one-sided families are those for which we cannot identify one of the
two sides of the V-shape. The results of the fit are described in Table 6.
The families of this type can be due to fragmentations and craterings: in
most cases there is no dominant largest fragment, and they might have had
18
parent bodies disappeared in the resonance which also wiped out one of the
sides, thus we do not really know.
Table 6: Slopes of the V-shape for the one-sided families: family number/name, number
of dynamical family members, side, slope (S), inverse slope (1/S), standard deviation of
the inverse slope.
number/
name
170 Maria
1272 Gefion
2076 Levin
3827 Zdenekhorsky
1658 Innes
375 Ursula
no.
members
side
S
1/S
IN
1431 OUT
1341
1237 OUT
794
606 OUT
335
IN
IN
1.487
-2.594
7.080
-10.871
6.006
-0.516
0.672
-0.386
0.141
-0.092
0.167
-1.938
STD
1/S
0.059
0.094
0.023
0.009
0.011
0.426
• The family 170 (Maria) has a possible subfamily for low proper a (no
effect on the OUT slope). There is no dominant largest fragment, thus
it could be either a fragmentation or a cratering, in the latter case with
parent body removed by the 3/1 resonance.
• For the family 1272 (Gefion) there is no dominant largest fragment,
thus the same argument applies, with possible parent body removal by
the 5/2 resonance.
• For family 2076 (Levin) the possibility of merging with families 298
(Baptistina) and 883 has been discussed in (Milani et al., 2014)[Sec.
4.1]. Joining Baptistina does not change the slopes; joining 883 would
result in a two-sided V-shape, with a gap due to the 7/2 resonance
in between; however, the two slopes would be very different. All three
dynamical families (for which we already have some intersections) could
be considered as a single complex dynamical family, but still they would
belong to different collisional families with different ages. The slope
(thus the age) we have computed belongs to the event generating only
the 2076 family. There are not enough significant physical data on the
members of these families5, not even on the comparatively large (298),
to help us in disentangling this complex case.
5E.g., (2076) has WISE data pv = 0.56 ± 0.32.
19
• Family 1658 (Innes) is the largest fragment but it is not dominant in
size, thus we cannot distinguish between fragmentation and cratering
with parent body removed by the 3/1 resonance.
• (375) Ursula is an outlier in the fit for the IN slope of 375. This can have
two interpretations. Either (375) is the largest fragment of a marginal
fragmentation (fragments are 23% of total volume), in which case it is
correct not to include it in the slope fit, or (375) is an interloper and
the family could have had a parent body later disappeared in the 2/1
resonance. Unfortunately, it is difficult to use albedo data to help on
this, because there is no albedo contrast with the background.
4. Age Estimation
4.1. Yarkovsky Calibrations
The method we use to convert the inverse slopes from the V-shape fit
into family ages has been established in (Milani et al., 2014)[Sec. 5.2], and
consists in finding a Yarkovsky calibration, which is the value of the Yarkovsky
driven secular drift da/dt for an hypothetical family member of size D = 1
km and with spin axis obliquity (with respect to the normal to the orbital
plane) 0◦ for the OUT side and 180◦ for the IN side. Since the inverse slope
is the change ∆(a) accumulated over the family age by a family member with
unit 1/D, the age is just ∆(t) = ∆(a)/(da/dt).
The question is how to produce the Yarkovsky calibration. As discussed in
(Milani et al., 2014)[Sec. 5.2.6], this can be done in different ways depending
upon which data are available. Unfortunately for main belt asteroids there
are too few data to compute any calibration:
indeed, a measured da/dt is
available for not even one main belt object. The solution we have used was
to extrapolate from the data available for Near Earth Asteroids. The best
estimate available for da/dt is the one of asteroid (101955) Bennu, with a
S/N ≃ 200 (Chesley et al., 2014). By suitable modeling of the Yarkovsky
effect, by using the available thermal properties measurements, the density of
Bennu has been estimated as ρBennu = 1.26 ± 0.07 g/cm3. Bennu is a B-type
asteroid, thus it is possible to compute its porosity by comparison with the
very large asteroid (704) Interamnia which is of the same taxonomic type
and has a reasonably well determined bulk density (Carry, 2012).
In Table 7 we list the data on benchmark large asteroids with known
taxonomy and density. For the other taxonomic classes we estimate the
20
Table 7: Benchmark asteroids for the density of a taxonomic type: number/name, taxo-
nomic type, densities as in (Carry, 2012) with their uncertainties, densities at 1 km.
number/
name
4 Vesta
10 Hygiea
15 Eunomia
216 Kleopatra
704 Interamnia
tax
type
V
C
S
Xe
B
ρ
ST D(ρ)
ρ
3.58
2.19
3.54
4.27
1.96
0.15
0.42
0.20
0.15
0.28
(1 km)
2.30
1.41
2.275
2.75
1.26
density at D = 1 km by assuming the same porosity of Bennu and the same
composition as the largest asteroid of the same taxonomic class. Thus in
the Table the density at D = 1 km for B class is the one of Bennu from
(Chesley et al., 2014), the ones for the other classes are obtained by scaling.
Once an estimate of the density ρ is available, the scaling formula can be
written as:
da
dt
=
da
dt(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)Bennu
√a(Bennu)(1 − e2
√a(1 − e2)
Bennu)
DBennu
ρBennu
cos(φ)
1 − A
ρ
D
cos(φBennu)
1 − ABennu
where D = 1 km used in this scaling formula is not the diameter of an actual
asteroid, but it is the reference value corresponding to the inverse slope; we
also assume cos(φ) = ±1, depending upon the IN/OUT side.
The additional terms which we would like to have in the scaling formula
are thermal properties, such as thermal inertia or thermal conductivity: the
problem is that these data are not available. To replace the missing thermal
parameters with another scaling law would not give a reliable result, also
because of the strong nonlinearity of the Yarkovsky effect as a function of
the conductivity, as shown in (Vokrouhlick´y et al., 2000)[Figure 1].
We are not claiming this is the best possible calibration for each fam-
ily. However, for generating a homogeneous set of family ages, we have to
use a uniform method for all. To improve the calibration (thus to decrease
the uncertainty of the age estimate) for a specific family is certainly pos-
sible, but requires a dedicated effort in both acquiring observational data
and modeling. E.g., the Yarkovsky effect could be measured from the orbit
determination for a family member (going to be possible with data from the
astrometric mission GAIA), thermal properties could be directly measured
with powerful infrared telescopes, densities can be derived for binaries by
21
Table 8: Data for the Yarkovsky calibration: family number and name, proper semimajor
axis a and eccentricity e for the inner and the outer side, 1-A, density value ρ at 1 km,
taxonomic type, a flag with values m (measured) a (assumed) g (guessed), and the relative
standard deviation of the calibration.
number/
name
158 Koronis
24 Themis
847 Agnia
3395 Jitka
1726 Hoffmeister
668 Dora
434 Hungaria
480 Hansa
808 Merxia
3330 Gantrisch
10955 Harig &
19466 Darcydiegel
1521 Seinajoki
569 Misa
15124 2000EZ39
1128 Astrid
845 Naema
4 Vesta
15 Eunomia
20 Massalia
10 Hygiea
31 Euphrosyne
3 Juno
163 Erigone &
5026 Martes
3815 Konig
396 Aeolia
606 Brangane
1547 Nele
18405 1993FY12
170 Maria
1272 Gefion
2076 Levin
3827 Zdenekhorsky
1658 Innes
375 Ursula
proper
a
IN
2.83
3.085
2.73
2.762
2.76
2.76
1.92
2.55
2.71
3.13
2.67
2.84
2.63
2.64
2.767
2.92
2.27
2.53
2.35
3.08
3.11
2.62
2.34
2.57
2.735
2.579
2.64
2.83
proper
e
IN
0.044
0.14
0.07
0.07
0.05
0.19
0.07
0.04
0.135
0.195
0.016
0.12
0.177
0.178
0.048
0.035
0.09
0.15
0.162
0.13
0.17
0.235
0.208
0.13
0.168
0.18
0.269
0.106
proper
a
OUT
2.93
3.23
2.81
2.81
2.8
2.8
1.97
2.69
2.78
3.16
2.77
2.866
2.69
2.67
2.81
2.95
2.44
2.69
2.46
3.24
3.2
2.69
2.37
2.58
2.743
2.59
2.646
2.86
2.65
proper
e
OUT
0.06
0.135
0.07
0.07
0.046
0.197
0.07
0.035
0.13
0.198
0.009
0.123
0.175
0.177
0.048
0.036
0.11
0.15
0.162
0.11
0.21
0.235
0.207
0.14
0.167
0.18
0.269
0.106
0.08
2.74
0.13
2.71
0.087
3.13
0.08
2.31
0.14
2.61
0.17
1-A ρ
(1 km)
flag
tax.
rel.
type m STD
0.92
0.98
0.92
0.92
0.98
0.98
0.87
0.91
0.92
0.98
0.92
0.92
0.94
0.98
0.98
0.98
0.98
0.88
0.92
0.92
0.98
0.98
0.92
0.98
0.98
0.98
0.97
0.96
0.88
0.94
0.91
0.92
0.93
0.98
0.91
0.98
2.275
1.41
2.275
2.275
1.41
1.41
2.75
2.45
2.45
1.41
2.275
2.275
2.275
1.41
1.41
1.41
1.41
2.3
2.275
2.275
1.41
1.41
2.275
1.41
1.41
1.41
2.75
2.275
2.275
2.275
2.275
2.275
2.275
1.41
2.275
1.41
S
C
S
S
C
C
Xe
S
S
C
S
S
S
C
C
C
C
V
S
S
C
C
S
C
C
C
Xe
S
S
S
S
S
S
C
S
C
m
m
m
m
a
a
g
m
m
g
g
g
g
a
a
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
a
a
m
g
g
m
a
g
m
g
m
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.25
0.25
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.25
0.25
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.25
0.25
0.20
0.30
0.30
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.20
0.30
0.20
22
using radar observations, for the cases with missing taxonomy it could be
obtained by spectrometry/infrared/polarimetry. A good example is given by
a very recent event: on January 26, 2015 the asteroid (357439) 2004 BL86
had a very close approach to the Earth, with minimum distance 0.008 au.
Thus it has been possible by radar to confirm that it has a satellite, and to
measure its diameter; infrared observations allowed to assign this asteroid to
the taxonomic class V. When all the data are analyzed and published, we
expect to have for (357439) an estimated density (from the satellite orbit
and the volume, both from the radar data). This could provide a Yarkovsky
calibration, specifically for the Vesta families, significantly better than the
one of this paper.
This implies that the main results of this paper are the inverse slopes,
from which the ages can continue to be improved as better calibration data
become available.
In Table 8 we are summarizing the data used to compute the calibration.
The eccentricity used in the calibration is selected, separately for the IN and
OUT side, as an approximate average of the values of proper eccentricity for
the family members with proper semimajor axis close to the limit. It is clear
that the extrapolation from Near Earth to main belt asteroids introduces
a model uncertainty, which is not the same in all cases. If a family has a
well determined taxonomic type, which corresponds to one of the benchmark
asteroids, our computation of the calibration is based on actual data and
we assign to this case a comparatively low relative calibration STD of 0.2;
these cases are labeled with the code "m". We have also estimated the Bond
albedo A, which is used in the scaling, from the mean geometric albedo pv
by WISE. For subfamilies 3395 (inside 847) and 15124 (inside 569) we have
assumed the same taxonomy as the larger family.
Then there are cases in which the taxonomic class is similar, but not
identical to the one of the benchmark. (1726) is of type Cb, (668) of type Ch
in the SMASSII classification, both assimilated to a generic C type; (808) is
Sq, (1272) is SI in SMASSII, (1658) is AS in the Tholen classification, all
assimilated to a generic S type. These are labeled with the code "a" and we
have assigned a relative STD of 0.25.
Finally we have 7 cases in which we do not have taxonomic data at all, but
just used the mean WISE albedo of Table 2 to guess a simplistic classification
into a C vs. S complex. These are labeled "g" and have a relative STD of
0.3. Thus these are the worst cases from the point of view of age uncertainty,
but they are the easiest to improve by observations.
23
4.2. Ages and their Uncertainties
The results on the ages are presented in Tables 9 -- 12, each containing the
Yarkovsky calibration, computed with the data of Table 8, the estimated age
and three measures of the age uncertainty.
The first uncertainty is the standard deviation of the inverse slope, as
output from the least square fit, divided by the calibration. The second is
the age uncertainty due to the calibration uncertainty from the last column
of Table 8: this relative uncertainty is multiplied by the estimated age. The
third is the standard deviation of the age, obtained by combining quadrati-
cally the STD from the fit with the STD from the calibration.
The first uncertainty is useful when comparing ages which can use the
same calibration, such as ages from the IN and from the OUT side (as shown
in the last two columns of Tables 3 -- 6); this can be applied also to the cases
of subfamilies. The third uncertainty is applicable whenever the absolute age
has to be used, as in the case in which the ages of two different families, with
independent calibration errors, are to be compared.
Among the figures, not included in this paper but available in the Sup-
plementary material site, there are all the V-shape plots, which can be useful
to better appreciate the robustness of our conclusions.
In this Section we also comment on ages for the same families found in
the scientific literature, with the warning that for some families there are
multiple estimates, including discordant ones, in some cases published by
the same authors at different times. Thus we think it is important to have
a source of ages computed with a uniform and well documented procedure,
such as this paper. Compilations of ages, such as (Nesvorn´y et al., 2005;
Broz et al., 2013), are useful for consultation, but have the limitation of
mixing results obtained with very different methods, sometimes even with
methods not specified. We use the terminology consistent when one nominal
value is within the STD of the other, compatible when difference of nominal
values is less than the sum of the two STD, discordant otherwise.
4.2.1. Ages of fragmentation families
The ages results are in Table 9; comments on specific families follow.
158 (Koronis): the present estimate increases somewhat the result we
reported in (Milani et al., 2014)[Table 10] of 1500 My for the OUT side
(the result for the IN side was considered of lower quality), but within
the fit uncertainty. Now the results from the two sides are not just con-
sistent but very close, and the fit uncertainty has slightly improved (in Ta-
24
Table 9: Age estimation for the fragmentation families: family number and name, da/dt,
age estimation, uncertainty of the age due to the fit, uncertainty of the age due to the
calibration, and total uncertainty of the age estimation.
number/
name
158 Koronis
24 Themis
847 Agnia
3395 Jitka
1726 Hoffmeister
668 Dora
434 Hungaria
480 Hansa
808 Merxia
3330 Gantrisch
10955 Harig &
19466 Darcydiegel
1521 Seinajoki
569 Misa
15124 2000EZ39
1128 Astrid
845 Naema
side
OUT
OUT
OUT
IN
OUT
OUT
IN
OUT
OUT
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
OUT
da/dt
Age
IN/OUT 10−10au/d My
1792
1708
2447
3782
1003
669
136
138
337
328
532
471
208
205
763
950
338
321
436
492
441
500
338
122
319
249
111
113
150
150
149
163
-3.40
3.34
-5.68
5.54
-3.46
3.41
-3.44
3.41
-5.90
5.86
-6.11
6.08
-3.23
3.18
-3.53
3.44
-3.52
3.47
-5.75
5.73
-3.48
3.42
-3.50
3.49
-6.23
6.15
-6.22
6.18
-5.89
5.85
-5.73
5.70
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
STD(fit)
STD(cal)
STD(age)
My
262
206
678
588
207
100
25
24
47
42
87
141
19
8
310
117
28
24
105
131
78
146
66
15
242
85
10
11
11
11
19
8
My
358
342
489
756
201
134
27
28
84
82
133
118
62
62
153
190
68
64
131
148
132
150
101
37
80
62
28
28
30
30
30
33
My
444
399
836
958
288
167
37
37
96
92
159
184
65
62
346
223
73
69
168
197
154
209
121
40
255
105
29
30
32
32
35
34
ble 10 of the previous paper the calibration uncertainty was not included).
The earliest estimates in the literature were just upper bounds of ≤ 2 Gy
(Marzari et al., 1995; Chapman et al., 1996), followed by (Greenberg et al.,
1996; Farinella et al., 1996) who give ∼ 2 Gy; Broz et al. (2013) give 2.5 ± 1
25
Gy, which is consistent with our results: our improvement in accuracy is
significant.
24 (Themis): the two sides give different values which are not discordant,
but are affected by large uncertainties. This is one of the oldest families, for
which there are few ages estimates in the literature: (Marzari et al., 1995)
give 2 Gy.
847 (Agnia): the new result is consistent with the one of (Milani et al.,
2014)[Table 10] for the IN side; the OUT side is anyway degraded by the
presence of the 3395 subfamily.
3395 (Jitka): the results are almost the same as in (Milani et al., 2014)[Table
10]. In the literature there are estimates for the age of Agnia, in (Vokrouhlick´y et al.,
2006a) of 100+30
−20 My, but from their Figure 1 it is clear that their Agnia fam-
ily is restricted to our Jitka subfamily, apart from the addition of (847) Agnia
itself. Also in (Broz et al., 2013) there is an estimate for 847 of 200 ± 100
My. Thus our results on the age are consistent with all the others, even if
we disagree on the name of the family.
1726 (Hoffmeister): our result is consistent with the one in (Nesvorn´y et al.,
2005; Broz et al., 2013), giving 300 ± 200 My, but with significantly lower
uncertainty. The fact that the perturbations from (1) Ceres do not appear to
disturb an evolution model based on the Yarkovsky secular drift is a confir-
mation of the statement by Delisle and Laskar (2012): chaotic perturbations
from other asteroids are less effective in shifting the semimajor axis than
Yarkovsky for the objects with D < 40 km.
668 (Dora): the OUT result is somewhat degraded by the 5/2 resonance,
thus the IN is better, but anyway they are consistent. (Broz et al., 2013) give
500 ± 200 My, in good agreement, notwithstanding the much lower distance
cutoff used to define the family (60 m/s vs. our 90).
434 (Hungaria): with a similar but less rigorous method, Milani et al.
(2010) find 274 My, which is higher but practically consistent with the current
result. Warner et al. (2009) give ∼ 500 My, but with a low accuracy method.
in the literature we find only (Carruba, 2010; Broz et al.,
2013) giving as upper bound < 1.6 Gy. Our result is much more informative,
especially from the OUT side.
480 (Hansa):
808 (Merxia): our results are consistent with both (Broz et al., 2013)
300 ± 200 My, and (Nesvorn´y et al., 2005) 500 ± 200, but significantly more
precise.
3330 (Gantrisch): we have found nothing in the literature on the age of
this family, thus the result is useful even if the relative accuracy is poor.
26
10955 (Harig), including 19466: a well determined slope, consistent be-
tween the two sides, thus confirming the join. The absolute age is of limited
accuracy because of the lack of physical observations. No previous estimates
found in the literature.
1521 (Seinajoki) has two significantly different ages, younger for the OUT
side. This is an additional case of a dynamical family containing two colli-
sional families. (Nesvorn´y et al., 2005) gives 50± 40 My, which is compatible
with our estimate for the OUT side.
1128 (Astrid) has a perfect agreement on the two sides, which appears as
a coincidence since the uncertainty is much higher. Nesvorn´y et al. (2005)
give 100 ± 50 which is consistent, our estimate being more precise.
845 (Naema) has a good agreement on the two sides. Nesvorn´y et al.
(2005) give 100 ± 50 which is compatible, our estimate being more precise.
4.2.2. Ages of cratering families
The ages results are in Table 10; comments on each family follow.
Table 10: Age estimation for the cratering families. Columns as in Table 9.
number/
name
4 Vesta
15 Eunomia
20 Massalia
10 Hygiea
31 Euphrosyne
3 Juno
163 Erigone &
5026 Martes
side
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
OUT
IN
OUT
IN
IN
da/dt
Age
IN/OUT 10−10au/d My
930
1906
1955
1144
174
189
1330
1368
1309
1160
550
370
212
230
-3.60
3.49
-3.66
3.55
-3.81
3.73
-5.67
5.50
-5.71
5.72
-3.46
3.41
-6.68
6.64
IN
IN
IN
IN
OUT
STD(fit)
STD(cal)
STD(age)
My
112
537
155
57
7
16
139
183
169
142
110
143
53
46
My
186
381
391
229
35
38
266
274
262
232
110
74
42
19
My
217
659
421
236
35
41
300
329
312
272
156
161
68
50
4 (Vesta): the idea that Vesta might have suffered two large impacts
generating two families (Milani et al., 2014)[Sec. 7.3] is quite natural given
that cratering does not decrease the collisional cross section, and has been
proposed long ago (Farinella et al., 1996). The new error model and outlier
rejection procedure have reduced the fit uncertainty, especially for the OUT
27
side, thus the ratio of values on the two sides has increased its level of signifi-
cance (see Table 4). The good agreement of the age from the IN side with the
cratering age of the Rheasilvia basin, 1 Gy according to Marchi et al. (2012)
is very interesting. Only a rough lower bound age of ∼ 2 Gy is available
for the Veneneia basin because of the disruption due to the impact forming
Rheasilvia (O'Brien et al., 2014). Thus our age estimate from the OUT side
is an independent constraint to the age of Veneneia.
15 (Eunomia):
in (Milani et al., 2014)[Table 10] the difference in the
slopes for the two sides was much smaller and the fit uncertainty for the
OUT side much larger, thus the existence of two separate ages was proposed
as possible. The improved results provide a ratio very significantly different
from 1, thus the existence of two collisional families inside the single dynami-
cal family 15 is now supported by high S/N evidence. Nesvorn´y et al. (2005)
give 2.5 ± 0.5 Gy as age for the entire family, which is compatible with our
IN side age.
20 (Massalia): our new results are very similar to the ones of our previous
paper as well as consistent with (Vokrouhlick´y et al., 2006b), giving as most
likely an age between 150 and 200 My. On the contrary (Nesvorn´y et al.,
2003) give 300 ± 100 which is marginally compatible.
10 (Hygiea): the interesting point is that this dynamical family appears
to have a single age, a non-trivial result since the family has a bimodal shape
in the proper (a, e) projection, and (10) has almost the same impact cross
section as (4) Vesta. In the literature we found only (Nesvorn´y et al., 2005)
giving a consistent, but low accuracy, 2 ± 1 Gy.
31 (Euphrosine): This high proper sin I family is crossed by many reso-
nances, nevertheless the age can be estimated. In the literature, we found
only the upper bound < 1.5 Gy in (Broz et al., 2013).
3 (Juno): the two ages IN and OUT are not consistent but only com-
patible; more data are needed to assess the possibility of multiple collisions.
In the literature we found only an upper bound < 700 My in (Broz et al.,
2013).
163 (Erigone): another very good example of join of two dynamical fam-
ilies, 163 and 5026, into a collisional family with all the properties expected,
including age estimates consistent (within half of STD) and a lower num-
ber density in a central strip. (Vokrouhlick´y et al., 2006b) give an age of
280 ± 112 My, which is higher but consistent; (Bottke et al., 2015) by a dif-
ferent method give an age 170+25
−30, which is lower but consistent with the IN
side. From the figures we can deduce that in both papers their family 163
28
Table 11: Age estimation for the young families. Columns as in Table 9.
number/
name
3815 Konig
396 Aeolia
606 Brangane
1547 Nele
18405 1993FY12
OUT
OUT
IN
IN
da/dt
Age
IN/OUT 10−10au/d My
51
51
100
91
48
44
14
15
83
83
-6.21
6.21
-3.09
3.08
-3.82
3.81
-3.61
3.61
-3.50
3.48
IN
IN
IN
side
OUT
OUT
OUT
STD(fit)
STD(cal)
STD(age)
My
6
6
18
15
4
7
2
5
28
13
My
13
13
25
23
10
9
4
5
25
25
My
14
14
31
27
10
11
5
7
37
28
also includes our 5026.
4.2.3. Ages of young families
1547 (Nele):
The ages results are in Table 11. We are interested in finding a lower limit
for the ages we can compute with the V-shape method. For most of these
asteroids there are in the literature only either upper bounds or low relative
accuracy estimates of the ages (Broz et al., 2013). In order of estimated age:
for this family Broz et al. (2013) give an age < 40 My;
Nesvorn´y et al. (2003) give a constraint ≤ 5 My on the age of the Iannini
cluster, which he identified as composed of 18 members not including (1547).
Our estimate (for a family with 152 − 3 = 149 members, including (4652)
Iannini) is higher, but such a young age could be too much affected by the
effect of the initial velocity field, which is apparent in the anti-correlation
between proper a, e. From this example we conclude that probably 15 My
is too young to be an accurate estimate by the V-shape method; this family
should be dated by a method using also the evolution of the angles , Ω.
3815 (Konig): we have a precise estimate, in the literature we have found
only an upper bound < 100 My (Broz et al., 2013).
606 (Brangane): also a precise estimate, in good agreement with 50 ± 40
in (Broz et al., 2013). We do not have a ground truth to assess the systematic
error due to contamination from the initial velocity spread, which for these
ages may not be negligible6.
6A size independent velocity spread is removed by our fit method, but there may well
29
396 (Aeolia): also a precise estimate, consistent with the upper bound
< 100 My in (Broz et al., 2013). 18405 (1993FY12): Broz et al. (2013) give
an age < 200 My. Our estimate is precise and not just consistent, but the
same on the two sides. For this range of ages around 100 My the initial
velocity field should not matter.
From these examples we can conclude that the V-shape method is ap-
plicable to young families with ages below 100 My, but there is some lower
age limit tmin such that younger ages are inaccurately estimated from the
V-shape. The cases we have analyzed suggest that tmin > 15 My, but we do
not have enough information to set an upper bound for tmin.
4.2.4. Ages of one-sided families
The ages results are in Table 12; these ages are based upon the assumption
that only one side of the family V-shape is preserved. Of course if this was not
the case, ages younger by factor roughly 2 would be obtained. For each case,
comments on the justification of the one-side assumption are given below.
Table 12: Age estimation for the one-sided families. Columns as in Table 9.
number/
name
170 Maria
1272 Gefion
2076 Levin
3827 Zdenekhorsky
1658 Innes
375 Ursula
side
OUT
OUT
da/dt
Age
IN/OUT 10−10au/d My
1932
1103
366
154
464
3483
3.48
-3.50
3.86
-5.99
3.59
-5.56
OUT
IN
IN
IN
STD(fit)
STD(cal)
STD(age)
My
169
270
59
14
31
765
My
386
276
110
31
139
697
My
422
386
125
34
143
1035
170 (Maria): the very strong 3/1 resonance with Jupiter makes it impos-
sible for asteroids of the IN side of the family to have survived in the main
belt, moreover the shape of the family in the (a, 1/D) plane is unequivocally
one sided. This is an ancient family, and our age estimate is compatible with
3± 1 Gy given in (Nesvorn´y et al., 2005), but we have significantly decreased
the estimate, to the point that this cannot be a "LHB" family, as suggested
by (Broz et al., 2013).
1272 (Gefion): the very strong 5/2 resonance with Jupiter makes it impos-
sible for most asteroids of the OUT side of the family to have survived in the
be a 1/D dependency in this spread.
30
main belt. Thus there is no OUT side in the V-shape7. Nesvorn´y et al. (2005)
give an age 1.2±0.4 Gy, in good agreement with ours, while (Nesvorn´y et al.,
2009)[Figure 1] show a one-sided model, giving a discordant age of 480 ± 50
My.
2076 (Levin): as discussed in Section 3, this could be just a component of
a complex family, possibly including 298 and 883. The OUT slope, thus the
age we have estimated, refers to the event generating 2076, while 298 and
883 have too few members for a reliable age. In the literature there are ages
for the family of (298) Baptistina: e.g., Bottke et al. (2007) give a discordant
age of 160+30
−20 My, but they refer to a two-sided V-shape including our 883,
with an enormous number of outliers.
3827 (Zdenekhorsky): the family shape is obviously asymmetric, with
much fewer members on the OUT side8. This prevents a statistically signifi-
cant determination of the OUT slope. The family is not abruptly truncated,
possibly because the effect of (1) Ceres is weaker than the one of the main
resonances with Jupiter.
1658 (Innes): the shape of the family in the (a, 1/D) plane is clearly one-
sided. The family ends on the IN side a bit too far from the 3/1 resonance,
thus the dynamics of the depletion on the IN side remains to be investigated.
375 (Ursula): the strongest 1/2 resonance with Jupiter makes it impos-
sible for most asteroids of the OUT side of the family to have survived in
the main belt. This prevents a statistically significant determination of the
OUT slope. With an age estimated at ∼ 3.5 ± 1 Gy, this family could be
the oldest for which we have an age. Broz et al. (2013) give the upper bound
< 3.5 Gy.
5. Conclusions and future work
In this paper we have computed the ages of 37 collisional families9. The
members of these collisional families belong to 34 dynamical families, in-
cluding 30 of those with > 250 members. Moreover, we have computed
uncertainties based on a well defined error model: the standard deviations
7See the figure 1272 vshapea.eps in the Supplementary material.
8See the figure 3827 vshapea.eps in the supplementary material.
9Plus one possible, a second age for the family 3 (Juno) with a moderate significance
in the slope ratio, see Table 4.
31
for the ages are quite large in many cases, but still the signal to noise ratio
is significantly > 1.
5.1. Main results
In Figure 5 we have placed the families on the horizontal axis with the
same order used in the Tables, separated in four categories10.
an error bar σ = qσ2
On the vertical axis (in a logarithmic scale) we have marked the estimated
age with a 1 STD error bar. To avoid overcrowding of the Figure, for the
families with compatible ages from the IN and OUT side we have used the
average (weighted with the inverse square of the STD) as the nominal with
OU T /2. If the two ages are incompatible we have
plotted the two estimates with the corresponding bars11. We have also used
an informal terminology by which families are rated by their age: primordial
with age > 3.7 Gy, ancient with age between 1 and 3.7 Gy, old with age
between 0.1 and 1 Gy, and finally the adjective young, as used previously, is
for ages < 0.1 Gy.
IN + σ2
By looking at Figure 5 it is apparent that we have been quite successful
in computing ages for old families, we have significant results for both young
and ancient, while we have little, if any, evidence for primordial families. This
should not be rated as a surprise: already Broz et al. (2013), while specifically
searching for primordial families, found a very short list of candidates, out of
which 4, 10, 15, 158 and 170 we are showing to be ancient, but not primordial.
From our results, only two families could be primordial, 24 and 375, although
they are more likely to be just ancient. Thus we agree with the conclusion
by Vokrouhlick´y et al. (2010) that most of the primordial families, which
undoubtedly have existed, have been depleted of members to the point of
not being recognized by statistically significant number density contrast: our
results indicate that this conclusion applies not only to the Cybele region
(beyond the 2/1 resonance) but to the entire main belt.
Figure 5 also shows that our results allow many statistically significant
absolute age comparisons between different families. Although the results
should be improved, especially by obtaining more accurate Yarkovsky cali-
brations, this can be the beginning of a real asteroid belt chronology. The
10To locate
these
families
to use
the graphic visualizer of asteroid families provided by the AstDyS site at
http://hamilton.dm.unipi.it/astdys2/Plot/
in the asteroid belt,
the best way is
11For 847 we have used the IN age and STD, as discussed in Section 3.
32
Family ages with error bars
FRAGMENTATION
CRATERING YOUNG ONE−SIDED
415
1031
15
4
3
163
20
845
375
170
1272
1658
2076
3827
847
480
668
3330
1726
808
10955
1521
569
434
3395
1128
1521
15124
1010
PRIMORDIAL
ANCIENT
24
158
)
s
r
a
e
y
(
s
e
g
A
109
108
OLD
YOUNG
107
−5
396
18405
3815
606
1547
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Families ordered as in the Tables
Figure 5: Family ages and their uncertainties computed in this paper. If two ages
of the same family are incompatible, the figure shows both ages; this applies to
families 4, 15, 1521. The horizontal dashed lines separate the conventional age
groupings, the vertical solid lines separate the family types, for the definitions see
in the text.
large compilations of family ages, such as Nesvorn´y et al. (2005); Broz et al.
(2013) are very useful to confirm that our results are reasonable. When avail-
able, the uncertainties reported in these compilations are generally larger; of-
ten only upper/lower bounds are given. However, the literature as analyzed
in Section 4.2 shows that often results obtained with different methods, even
by the same authors, can be discordant. Thus the comparison of ages for dif-
ferent families should not be done with the ages listed in a compilation, but
only from a list of ages computed with a single consistent method, including
33
a single consistent calibration scheme, as in this paper.
In the previous paper Milani et al. (2014) we had introduced the dis-
tinction between dynamical and collisional families; out of the 5 dynamical
families we analyzed as examples, we found 3 cases in which a dynamical fam-
ily corresponds to at least 2 collisional ones. In this paper we report on the
results of a systematic survey of the largest (by number of members) dynam-
ical families, monitoring whether the 1 to 1 correspondence with collisional
families does or does not apply.
We have found two examples, for which we use the definition of family
join, in which two separate dynamical families together form a single V-shape,
with consistent slopes, thus indicating a single collisional event: this applies
to families 10955 and 19466, 163 and 5026. Note that this is distinct from
a family merge which can arise when two families, as a result of adding new
members with recently computed proper elements, acquire some members in
common (Knezevi´c et al., 2014).
We have also found at least three examples of dynamical families contain-
ing multiple collisional families: 4, 15 and 1521. For these we have obtained
discordant slopes from the IN and the OUT side of the V-shape, resulting
in distinct ages, see Figure 5. We have found a dubious case, family 3, and
there are several other cases already either known or suspected.
Finally, we have found two cases of families containing a conspicuous
subfamily, with a sharp number density contrast, such that it is possible to
measure the slope of a distinct V-shape for the subfamily, thus the age of the
secondary collision: the subfamily 3395 of 847, and 15124 of 569. There are
several cases of subfamilies, with a separate collisional age, already reported
in the literature, but they are mostly from recent (< 10 My of age) collisions:
we have identified subfamilies with ages of ∼ 100 My.
From the above discussion, we think a new paradigm emerges: whenever
a family age computation is performed, the question on the minimum number
of collisional events capable of generating the observed distribution of mem-
bers of the family in the classification space has to be analyzed. This needs
to take also into account other families in the neighborhood (in the classifica-
tion space). In our case, the classification space is the 3-dimensional proper
elements space because we use dynamical families, but note that the same
argument applies also to other classifications made in different spaces, such
as the ones containing also physical observations data: separate collisional
families may well have the same composition.
34
5.2. Open problems
On other issues we have accumulated data, useful to constrain the asteroid
families evolution, but we do not have a full model.
An example is the fact already known that many families have a central
gap, in the sense of a bimodal number frequency distribution of members as
a function of proper a. The interpretation of this gap as a consequence of
the interaction between the YORP and the Yarkovsky effect, as proposed in
(Vokrouhlick´y et al., 2006b), is plausible and widely accepted, but a model
capable of predicting the timescales of this evolution is not available.
We have observed the presence and depth of the gap for all the families
having, in our best estimate, < 600 My.
• Ages between 10 and 100 My: the gap does not occur in the youngest
1547 and the one near the upper limit of 100 My, that is 396, but occurs
in 18405 which has an age similar to 396, and in the two with ages ∼ 50
My, 3815 and 606.
• Ages between 100 and 200 My: the gap occurs consistently in families
such as 3395, 15124, 1128, 845, and less deep in 20.
• Ages between 200 and 400 My: there are three families with gap (434,
808, 163) and two without (1726, 3).
• Ages between 400 and 600 My: 10955 has a gap and 668 does not.
• Ages > 600 My: among the ancient families only 158 and maybe 31
show some small dip in density at the center.
These results do not contradict the interpretation that YORP moves the
rotation axes towards the spin up/spin down position, but takes quite some
time to achieve a strong bimodality which gradually empties the gap. Over
longer time scales, spin axis randomization can reverse the process. However,
our set of examples above shows that the time scales for such processes are
not uniform, but may substantially change from family to family.
Another open problem results from the fact that several families on the
outer edge of the 3/1 resonance gap appear to have a boundary close to, but
not at the Kirkwood gap. This happens to the IN side of families 480 and
15; there are also families 170 and 1658 which are one-sided because of the
missing IN side, with the family not touching the gap. This might require a
dedicated study to find a plausible explanation.
35
5.3. Family ages left to be computed
Of the dynamical families in the current classification, there are 11 with
> 300 members for which we have not yet computed a satisfactory age. The
motivations are as follows.
• There are five complex families: 135, known to have at least two colli-
sional families, with incompatible physical properties, difficult to disen-
tangle; see e.g., (Milani et al., 2014)[Figure 10]; 221, complex both for
dynamical evolution (Vokrouhlick´y et al., 2006c) and suspect of mul-
tiple collisions; 145, which appears to have at least 2 ages; 25, corre-
sponding to a stable region surrounded by secular resonances, could
have many collisional families; 179, a cratering family which is difficult
to be interpreted.
• There are another four families strongly affected in their shape in proper
element space by resonances: 5, 110, 283 with secular resonances, and
1911 inside the 3/2 resonance.
• Two others: 490, well known to be of recent age (Nesvorn´y et al., 2003;
Tsiganis et al., 2007); 1040, at large proper sin I and also quite large
e; both are strongly affected by 3-body resonances.
We are convinced that for many of these it will be possible to estimate
the age, but this might require ad hoc methods, different from case to case.
In this paper we have included all the ages which we have up to now been
able to estimate by a uniform method.
Other families with marginal number of members for the V-shape fit
(between 100 and 300 in the current classification) could become suitable
as new proper elements are computed and the classification is automatically
updated, especially in the zones where the number density is low, such as
the high I region, and the Cybele region, beyond the 2/1 resonance.
Acknowledgments
The authors have been supported for this research by: ITN Marie Curie
"STARDUST -- the Asteroid and Space Debris Network" (FP7-PEOPLE-
2012-ITN, Project number 317185) (A.M. and Z.K), the Department of
Mathematics of the University of Pisa (A.M. and F.S.), SpaceDyS srl, Cascina,
36
Italy (F.S.), and the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological De-
velopment of Serbia, under the project 176011 (Z.K.).
The authors would also like to thank Melissa Dykhuis and Marco Delb`o
for their helpful comments.
References
References
Bottke, W. F., Vokrouhlick´y, D., Nesvorn´y, D., Sep. 2007. An asteroid
breakup 160Myr ago as the probable source of the K/T impactor. Nature
449, 48 -- 53.
Bottke, W. F., Vokrouhlick´y, D., Walsh, K., Delb`o, M., Michel, P., Lauretta,
D., Campins, H., Connolly, H. J., Scheeres, D., Chesley, S., Jan. 2015.
In search of the source of asteroid (101955) Bennu: Applications of the
stochastic YORP model. Icarus 245, 191 -- 217.
Broz, M., Morbidelli, A., Bottke, W. F., Rozehnal, J., Vokrouhlick´y, D.,
Nesvorn´y, D., Mar. 2013. Constraining the cometary flux through the as-
teroid belt during the late heavy bombardment. A&A 551, A117.
Carpino, M., Milani, A., Chesley, S. R., Dec. 2003. Error statistics of asteroid
optical astrometric observations. Icarus 166, 248 -- 270.
Carruba, V., Oct. 2010. The stable archipelago in the region of the Pallas
and Hansa dynamical families. MNRAS 408, 580 -- 600.
Carry, B., 2012. Density of asteroids. Planetary and Space Science 73, 98 --
118.
Chapman, C. R., Ryan, E. V., Merline, W. J., Neukum, G., Wagner, R.,
Thomas, P. C., Veverka, J., Sullivan, R. J., Mar. 1996. Cratering on Ida.
Icarus 120, 77 -- 86.
Chesley, S. R., Farnocchia, D., Nolan, M. C., Vokrouhlick´y, D., Chodas,
P. W., Milani, A., Spoto, F., Rozitis, B., Benner, L. A. M., Bottke, W. F.,
Busch, M. W., Emery, J. P., Howell, E. S., Lauretta, D. S., Margot, J.-L.,
Taylor, P. A., Jun. 2014. Orbit and bulk density of the OSIRIS-REx target
Asteroid (101955) Bennu. Icarus 235, 5 -- 22.
37
Delisle, J.-B., Laskar, J., Apr. 2012. Chaotic diffusion of the Vesta family
induced by close encounters with massive asteroids. A&A 540, A118.
Farinella, P., Davis, D. R., Marzari, F., 1996. Asteroid Families, Old and
Young. In: Rettig, T., Hahn, J. M. (Eds.), Completing the Inventory of the
Solar System. Vol. 107 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference
Series. pp. 45 -- 55.
Greenberg, R., Bottke, W. F., Nolan, M., Geissler, P., Petit, J.-M., Durda,
D. D., Asphaug, E., Head, J., Mar. 1996. Collisional and Dynamical His-
tory of Ida. Icarus 120, 106 -- 118.
Knezevi´c, Z., Milani, A., Cellino, A., Novakovi´c, B., Spoto, F., Paolicchi,
P., 2014. Automated classification of asteroids into families at work. In:
Knezevi´c, Z., Lemaitre, A. (Eds.), Complex Planetary Systems. Proceed-
ings of the IAU Symposia, Cambridge Univ. Press. pp. 130 -- 133.
Mainzer, A., Grav, T., Bauer, J., Masiero, J., McMillan, R. S., Cutri, R. M.,
Walker, R., Wright, E., Eisenhardt, P., Tholen, D. J., Spahr, T., Jedicke,
R., Denneau, L., DeBaun, E., Elsbury, D., Gautier, T., Gomillion, S.,
Hand, E., Mo, W., Watkins, J., Wilkins, A., Bryngelson, G. L., Del Pino
Molina, A., Desai, S., G´omez Camus, M., Hidalgo, S. L., Konstantopoulos,
I., Larsen, J. A., Maleszewski, C., Malkan, M. A., Mauduit, J.-C., Mullan,
B. L., Olszewski, E. W., Pforr, J., Saro, A., Scotti, J. V., Wasserman, L. H.,
Dec. 2011. NEOWISE Observations of Near-Earth Objects: Preliminary
Results. The Astrophysical Journal 743, 156.
Marchi, S., McSween, H. Y., O'Brien, D. P., Schenk, P., De Sanctis, M. C.,
Gaskell, R., Jaumann, R., Mottola, S., Preusker, F., Raymond, C. A.,
Roatsch, T., Russell, C. T., May 2012. The Violent Collisional History of
Asteroid 4 Vesta. Science 336, 690 -- 694.
Marzari, F., Davis, D., Vanzani, V., Jan. 1995. Collisional evolution of as-
teroid families. Icarus 113, 168 -- 187.
Masiero, J. R., Mainzer, A. K., Grav, T., Bauer, J. M., Cutri, R. M., Dai-
ley, J., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., McMillan, R. S., Spahr, T. B., Skrutskie,
M. F., Tholen, D., Walker, R. G., Wright, E. L., DeBaun, E., Elsbury, D.,
Gautier, IV, T., Gomillion, S., Wilkins, A., Nov. 2011. Main Belt Aster-
oids with WISE/NEOWISE. I. Preliminary Albedos and Diameters. The
Astrophysical Journal 741, 68.
38
Milani, A., Cellino, A., Knezevi´c, Z., Novakovi´c, B., Spoto, F., Paolicchi,
P., 2014. Asteroid families classification: Exploiting very large datasets.
Icarus 239, 46 -- 73.
Milani, A., Knezevi´c, Z., Novakovi´c, B., Cellino, A., Jun. 2010. Dynamics of
the Hungaria asteroids. Icarus 207, 769 -- 794.
Nesvorn´y, D., Bottke, W. F., Levison, H. F., Dones, L., Jul. 2003. Recent
Origin of the Solar System Dust Bands. Astrophys.J 591, 486 -- 497.
Nesvorn´y, D., Jedicke, R., Whiteley, R. J., Ivezi´c, Z., Jan. 2005. Evidence
for asteroid space weathering from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Icarus
173, 132 -- 152.
Nesvorn´y, D., Vokrouhlick´y, D., Morbidelli, A., Bottke, W. F., Apr. 2009.
Asteroidal source of L chondrite meteorites. Icarus 200, 698 -- 701.
O'Brien, D. P., Marchi, S., Morbidelli, A., Bottke, W. F., Schenk, P. M.,
Russell, C. T., Raymond, C. A., Nov. 2014. Constraining the cratering
chronology of Vesta. Planetary Space Sci. 103, 131 -- 142.
Pravec, P., Harris, A. W., Kusnir´ak, P., Gal´ad, A., Hornoch, K., Sep. 2012.
Absolute magnitudes of asteroids and a revision of asteroid albedo esti-
mates from WISE thermal observations. Icarus 221, 365 -- 387.
Shepard, M. K., Kressler, K. M., Clark, B. E., Ockert-Bell, M. E., Nolan,
M. C., Howell, E. S., Magri, C., Giorgini, J. D., Benner, L. A. M., Ostro,
S. J., May 2008. Radar observations of E-class Asteroids 44 Nysa and 434
Hungaria. Icarus 195, 220 -- 225.
Tsiganis, K., Knezevi´c, Z., Varvoglis, H., Feb. 2007. Reconstructing the or-
bital history of the Veritas family. Icarus 186, 484 -- 497.
Vokrouhlick´y, D., Broz, M., Bottke, W. F., Nesvorn´y, D., Morbidelli, A.,
Aug. 2006a. The peculiar case of the Agnia asteroid family. Icarus 183,
349 -- 361.
Vokrouhlick´y, D., Broz, M., Bottke, W. F., Nesvorn´y, D., Morbidelli, A.,
May 2006b. Yarkovsky/YORP chronology of asteroid families. Icarus 182,
118 -- 142.
39
Vokrouhlick´y, D., Broz, M., Morbidelli, A., Bottke, W. F., Nesvorn´y, D.,
Lazzaro, D., Rivkin, A. S., May 2006c. Yarkovsky footprints in the Eos
family. Icarus 182, 92 -- 117.
Vokrouhlick´y, D., Milani, A., Chesley, S. R., 2000. Yarkovsky Effect on Small
Near-Earth Asteroids: Mathematical Formulation and Examples. Icarus
148, 118 -- 138.
Vokrouhlick´y, D., Nesvorn´y, D., Bottke, W. F., Morbidelli, A., Jun. 2010.
Collisionally Born Family About 87 Sylvia. Astron.J. 139, 2148 -- 2158.
Warner, B. D., Harris, A. W., Vokrouhlick´y, D., Nesvorn´y, D., Bottke, W. F.,
Nov. 2009. Analysis of the Hungaria asteroid population. Icarus 204, 172 --
182.
Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., Ressler, M. E., Cutri,
R. M., Jarrett, T., Kirkpatrick, J. D., Padgett, D., McMillan, R. S., Skrut-
skie, M., Stanford, S. A., Cohen, M., Walker, R. G., Mather, J. C., Lei-
sawitz, D., Gautier, III, T. N., McLean, I., Benford, D., Lonsdale, C. J.,
Blain, A., Mendez, B., Irace, W. R., Duval, V., Liu, F., Royer, D., Hein-
richsen, I., Howard, J., Shannon, M., Kendall, M., Walsh, A. L., Larsen,
M., Cardon, J. G., Schick, S., Schwalm, M., Abid, M., Fabinsky, B.,
Naes, L., Tsai, C.-W., Dec. 2010. The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer
(WISE): Mission Description and Initial On-orbit Performance. The As-
tronomical Journal 140, 1868 -- 1881.
Zappal´a, V., Cellino, A., Farinella, P., Knezevi´c, Z., 1990. Asteroid fami-
lies. I - Identification by hierarchical clustering and reliability assessment.
Astronomical Journal 100, 2030 -- 2046.
40
|
1704.05508 | 1 | 1704 | 2017-04-18T20:06:51 | Disk masses around solar-mass stars are underestimated by CO observations | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | Gas in protostellar disks provides the raw material for giant planet formation and controls the dynamics of the planetesimal-building dust grains. Accurate gas mass measurements help map the observed properties of planet-forming disks onto the formation environments of known exoplanets. Rare isotopologues of carbon monoxide (CO) have been used as gas mass tracers for disks in the Lupus star-forming region, with an assumed interstellar CO/H$_2$ abundance ratio. Unfortunately, observations of T-Tauri disks show that CO abundance is not interstellar---a finding reproduced by models that show CO abundance decreasing both with distance from the star and as a function of time. Here we present radiative transfer simulations that assess the accuracy of CO-based disk mass measurements. We find that the combination of CO chemical depletion in the outer disk and optically thick emission from the inner disk leads observers to underestimate gas mass by more than an order of magnitude if they use the standard assumptions of interstellar CO/H$_2$ ratio and optically thin emission. Furthermore, CO abundance changes on million-year timescales, introducing an age/mass degeneracy into observations. To reach factor of a few accuracy for CO-based disk mass measurements, we suggest that observers and modelers adopt the following strategies: (1) select the low-$J$ transitions; (2) observe multiple CO isotopologues and use either intensity ratios or normalized line profiles to diagnose CO chemical depletion; and (3) use spatially resolved observations to measure the CO abundance distribution. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph |
Draft version June 7, 2021
Preprint typeset using LATEX style AASTeX6 v. 1.0
DISK MASSES AROUND SOLAR-MASS STARS ARE UNDERESTIMATED BY CO OBSERVATIONS
Mo Yu1, Neal J. Evans II1, 2, Sarah E. Dodson-Robinson3, Karen Willacy4, and Neal J. Turner4
1Astronomy Department, University of Texas, 2515 Speedway, Stop C1400, Austin, TX 78712, USA
2Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, 776, Daedeokdae-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 34055, Korea
3University of Delaware, Department of Physics and Astronomy, 217 Sharp Lab, Newark, DE 19716
4Mail Stop 169-506, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109
ABSTRACT
Gas in protostellar disks provides the raw material for giant planet formation and controls the dy-
namics of the planetesimal-building dust grains. Accurate gas mass measurements help map the
observed properties of planet-forming disks onto the formation environments of known exoplanets.
Rare isotopologues of carbon monoxide (CO) have been used as gas mass tracers for disks in the
Lupus star-forming region, with an assumed interstellar CO/H2 abundance ratio. Unfortunately,
observations of T-Tauri disks show that CO abundance is not interstellar -- a finding reproduced by
models that show CO abundance decreasing both with distance from the star and as a function of
time. Here we present radiative transfer simulations that assess the accuracy of CO-based disk mass
measurements. We find that the combination of CO chemical depletion in the outer disk and optically
thick emission from the inner disk leads observers to underestimate gas mass by more than an order
of magnitude if they use the standard assumptions of interstellar CO/H2 ratio and optically thin
emission. Furthermore, CO abundance changes on million-year timescales, introducing an age/mass
degeneracy into observations. To reach factor of a few accuracy for CO-based disk mass measure-
ments, we suggest that observers and modelers adopt the following strategies: (1) select the low-J
transitions; (2) observe multiple CO isotopologues and use either intensity ratios or normalized line
profiles to diagnose CO chemical depletion; and (3) use spatially resolved observations to measure the
CO abundance distribution.
1. INTRODUCTION
Solar System formation models that allow the giant planets to form within observed protostellar disk lifetimes of
a few million years (Haisch et al. 2001) often require density enhancements up to an order of magnitude above the
minimum-mass solar nebula (MMSN) (Pollack et al. 1996; Hubickyj et al. 2005; Thommes et al. 2008; Lissauer et al.
2009; Dodson-Robinson & Bodenheimer 2010; D'Angelo et al. 2014). Indeed, planet accretion may be a fundamentally
inefficient process, with both collisional fragmentation (e.g., Stewart & Leinhardt 2012) and planetesimal scattering
(e.g., Ida & Lin 2004) contributing to mass loss during solid embryo growth. Yet disk masses inferred from dust
emission in (sub)millimeter often do not reach the MMSN mass of 0.01M(cid:12) (Weidenschilling 1977; Hayashi 1981), and
are more commonly of order 1-10 Jupiter masses (Andrews & Williams 2007; Williams & Cieza 2011). Reporting
on a survey of T-Tauri stars in Lupus, Ansdell et al. (2016) suggested that 80% of the disks had dust-derived total
masses of < 0.01M(cid:12). However, dust-based disk mass estimates may be systematically low, because dust continuum
observations lose sensitivity to solids that are much larger than the observing wavelength (Williams & Cieza 2011). In
addition, the standard assumptions that the dust has a single temperature and that the sub-mm emission is optically
thin everywhere in the disk may not be correct. Finally, gas masses may not be related to the dust masses by the
usual interstellar ratio of 100. It is essential to measure the gas mass of disks directly.
One such gas mass measurement came from Bergin et al. (2013), who used Herschel observations of the HD (J =
1 → 0) transition to calculate a mass of 0.06M(cid:12), or 6 MMSN, for the disk surrounding TW Hydra -- a surprisingly large
mass given the star age of ∼ 10 Myr. The HD lines have since been detected in two more disks (McClure et al. 2016),
and are consistent with gas masses of 1-4.7 MMSN (DM Tau) and 2.5-20.4 MMSN (GM Aur). Although the GREAT
2
instrument on the far-IR observatory SOFIA1 covers the frequency of the HD transition, it is not sensitive enough to
observe HD in nearby disks. In the absence of the capability to observe the HD J = 1 → 0 transition in disks, CO has
been the standard tracer of the gas mass because it is believed to have simple chemistry and to stay in the gas phase
wherever T > 20 K in disks around Sunlike stars ( Oberg et al. 2011; Qi et al. 2013), a region that includes the entire
vertical column in the inner 30 AU and the warm surface layers of the outer disk. While the emission from 12C16O is
typically optically thick, it has been suggested (van Zadelhoff et al. 2001; Dartois et al. 2003) that rare isotopologues
of CO could be used to probe the disk midplanes. Yu et al. (2016) (hereafter Paper 1) have shown that the vertical
optical depth of low-J rotational emission lines of C17O is around unity in the inner ∼ 20 AU of a 1.5-MMSN disk,
meaning observers could see emission from the disk midplane -- where most of the mass is concentrated -- using C17O
lines. Unfortunately, Paper 1 also revealed some complexities in the CO chemistry that would interfere with disk mass
measurements. First, the CO abundance varies with distance from the star within the planet-forming region. Second,
the CO/H2 ratio drops to an order of magnitude below the interstellar value well inside the CO freeze-out radius
because of chemical depletion of CO. Finally, the CO abundance is a function of time, which introduces an age-mass
degeneracy into the interpretation of the observations.
Recent attempts to calculate gas-to-dust mass ratios using observations of rare CO isotopologues have also revealed
problems. In their survey of disks in the Lupus star-forming region, Ansdell et al. (2016) found gas-to-dust ratios,
calculated assuming a constant CO/H2 ratio of 10−4, to be much lower than the interstellar value of 100. Yet the stars
in the Lupus sample are still accreting, indicating that abundant gas is present. Studies of a more massive disk and
star (2.3 M(cid:12)) also found very low gas-to-dust ratios (Boneberg et al. 2016). Correcting for the joint effects of freeze-out
and isotope-selective photodissociation still does not bring the estimated gas-to-dust ratios up to 100, according to
the chemical models of Miotello et al. (2017). Either the disks are in the process of dispersing -- unlikely given the
rapid depletion timescale of ∼ 105 years once photoevaporation dominates the disk dynamics (e.g., Hollenbach et al.
2000; Alexander et al. 2014; Gorti et al. 2016) -- or additional pathways to remove gaseous CO (hereafter referred to
as chemical depletion) become important in disks, as suggested by Dutrey et al. (2003), Favre et al. (2013), Miotello
et al. (2017), and McClure et al. (2016). Some disks around HAeBe stars also appear to have CO/H2 < 10−4 (e.g.
Chapillon et al. 2008; Bruderer et al. 2012).
Also challenging the assumption of simple CO chemistry and a constant CO/H2 ratio in regions where CO is not
frozen out are the TW Hya observations of Schwarz et al. (2016), which show a drop in CO column density at ∼ 20 AU,
while the dust column density remains roughly constant with radius. In Paper 1, we found that CO chemical depletion
due to dissociation by He+ and subsequent complex organic molecule (COM) formation causes the CO/H2 abundance
ratio to drop far below the interstellar value of 10−4 at r > 20 AU, well inside the CO freeze-out radius in the model (see
figure 1). For disks with similar chemistry to the Paper 1 models, using interstellar abundance ratios to extrapolate
from CO to H2 column density would result in large underestimates of disk mass.
In this work we use radiative transfer models of CO rotational emission to assess the usefulness of rare CO isotopo-
logues as disk mass indicators, given the possibility of chemical CO chemical depletion. We summarize the key results
from our chemical evolution models in section 2, including a new model for a more massive disk. We present the setup
for and results of our line radiative transfer models in section 3. In section 4, we demonstrate that standard gas-mass
measurement methods -- based on integrated fluxes of lines assumed to be optically thin -- fail when applied to the
simulated CO emission from our model disk. We also evaluate the performance of published optical-depth correction
methods (Williams & Best 2014; Miotello et al. 2016), showing that they are inadequate for disks with non-uniform
CO abundance. In section 5 we further highlight the age-mass degeneracy problem caused by CO chemical depletion.
Next we show that (1) combining observations of multiple isotopologues, (2) using information on line profiles, and
(3) examining the spatial distribution of CO can diagnose CO chemical depletion (section 6). In section 7, we explore
whether our predicted CO/H2 abundance ratios can increase observed masses up to MMSN or higher when applied to
the Lupus disk sample of Ansdell et al. (2016). Section 8 summarizes our results.
We adopt the chemical-dynamical model from Paper 1 as the basis for our line radiative transfer models. Paper
1 presented the chemical evolution of a 0.015 M(cid:12) disk around a Solar-type star for 3 Myr. In this paper, we add
a chemical evolution model for a disk that is twice as massive, at 0.03 M(cid:12). The mass distributions and accretion
temperatures of both model disks were presented by Landry et al. (2013), and we find the stellar contribution to the
2. DISK MODEL
1 https://www.sofia.usra.edu/
3
disk heating from the dust radiative transfer code RADMC2. Because our goal is to measure disk masses in giant
planet-forming regions, we focus our study on the region covered in Landry et al. (2013) -- the inner 70 AU of the
disk. (As the disk ages, the amount of mass in the inner 70 AU decreases due to viscous spearing and accretion -- all
disk masses reported in this paper are calculated as (cid:82) 2πrΣ dr, where Σ is the column density, out to 70 AU.) The
chemical reaction network is run locally at each independent (r, z) grid point for 3 Myr, under the assumption that
the chemical reaction timescale is much shorter than the viscous timescale -- an assumption that is true for freezeout,
desorption, and grain-surface reactions, but which may fail for gas-phase reactions. Each disk gridpoint starts with
gas and ice abundances resulting from a 1 Myr simulation of the chemical evolution of a parent molecular cloud; as a
result, a substantial fraction of the carbon is tied up in CO2 and other ices at the start of disk evolution.
The chemical evolution models include C, H, O, N based on the UMIST database RATE06 (Woodall et al. 2007).
Woods & Willacy (2009) extended the network to include C isotopes, and we included both C and O isotopes in
Paper I. The chemical models follow the chemistry of 588 species, 414 gas-phase and 174 ices, for 3 Myr from the
beginning of the T-Tauri phase. The reaction network contains gas-phase reactions (including those that lead to C
and O fractionation), grain-surface reactions, freezeout, thermal desorption, and reactions triggered by UV, X-rays
and cosmic rays, such as isotope-selective photodissociation. To make our simulations computationally tractable, we
include only molecules with two or fewer carbon atoms, which limits the network to 11316 reactions. Some grain-
surface hydrogenation reactions, such as (C2H5 ice) + H → (C2H6 ice), are not included because they only lead to
sinks; we can save computational time by not computing the associated reaction rate and letting C2H5 ice be the sink
instead of C2H6 ice.
The simplifications we have made to the reaction network do not artificially remove carbon from the gas phase. In
Paper 1 we demonstrated that using a range of chemical networks, input chemical abundances and dust properties does
not change the evolution of CO abundance significantly. We take the temperatures and abundances from the fiducial
model in Paper 1 as the foundation for this study and refer readers to Paper 1 for detailed discussions of disk model
assumptions. The most debatable assumption from Paper 1 is that abundances in gas and icy components are inherited
from the molecular cloud without modification as they enter the disk. Indeed, Drozdovskaya et al. (2016) suggest that
disk midplane composition is largely determined by the conditions during cloud collapse. Visser et al. (2009) find that
CO ice formed in molecular clouds desorbs during cloud collapse, though it re-freezes without significant abundance
modification where the disk temperature is < 18 K.
Figure 1. CO abundance as a function of disk radius (R) and height (Z) at 2 Myr. We show results from the 0.015 M(cid:12) model
on the left and the 0.03 M(cid:12) model on the right. The abundance is defined as the number density with respect to the number
density of hydrogen nuclei (nH + 2nH2 ).
The disk is primarily heated passively from stellar irradiation; accretion contributes very little to the energy budget
(Landry et al. 2013, Paper 1). For the temperature calculation, we use the dust opacities computed by Semenov et al.
(2003), adjusted for our gas/dust ratio. We assume the dust has already grown and aggregated at the start of the
T-Tauri phase of disk evolution (Oliveira et al. 2010; P´erez et al. 2012; Birnstiel et al. 2011; Garaud et al. 2013), and
90% of the solids have grown to still larger sizes (pebbles, rocks, etc.), that contribute very little submillmeter emission.
2 http://www.ita.uni-heidelberg.de/ dullemond/software/radmc-3d/; developed by C. Dullemond
4
Figure 2. Abundances of major carbon-bearing molecules as a function of time at 40 AU on the disk midplane. We show results
from the 0.015 M(cid:12) model on the left and the 0.03 M(cid:12) model on the right.
We distinguish these solids from dust and take a gas/dust mass ratio of 1000. In Paper 1, we demonstrated that the
CO abundance is only weakly sensitive to evolution of the gas/dust ratio from 100 to 1000. Our grain model assumes
that there is a constant replenishment of small grains by collisions between larger objects (see Dullemond & Dominik
(2005); Brauer et al. (2008); Birnstiel et al. (2009); Wada et al. (2008, 2009); Windmark et al. (2012); though Zsom
et al. (2010) argues against replenishing micron-size dust grains through collisions) and the size distribution of dust
does not evolve. The theory that most of the solid mass has aggregated into pebbles and larger objects invisible to
submillimeter wave observations is the second major, non-standard assumption in our model (though Andrews et al.
(2012) and Cleeves et al. (2015) modeled the TW Hya disk with two distinct grain populations, small grains that
provide the visible/infrared opacity and large grains with a maximum size of 1 mm that provide the submillimeter
opacity). Following Cleeves et al. (2015), we assume the 90% of solid mass that has grown to pebble and larger sizes
provides negligible surface area for chemical reactions and exclude it from the chemical model.
As the central star dims during its time on the Hayashi track, the disk cools and its scale height shrinks. The
computational surface of our model grid, defined as the layer where the optical depth to the disk's own radiation is
τ = 0.2 (Landry et al. 2013), moves from about two pressure scale heights to about one scale height above the midplane
as the disk becomes cooler and thinner over time. The chemical model therefore contains fewer grid cells at the end of
evolution than at the beginning, as grid layers high above the midplane begin to empty out. In appendix A, we show
that our line profile and intensity calculations are only weakly sensitive to the changing disk surface.
Stellar heating is efficient enough to prevent CO from freezing out in our modeled region -- the inner 70 AU of the
disk -- at all vertical heights and at any time in the 3 Myr of evolution. However, CO is depleted beyond 20 AU from
the central star due to the formation of complex organic molecules. The CO chemical depletion is driven by ionization
of helium from X-rays and cosmic rays and happens over a million-year time scale. As a result, the CO abundance
changes both with location in the disk and with time. We show the color map of CO abundance at 2 Myr of the
disk evolution in Fig. 1 for both the Paper 1 disk (0.015 M(cid:12); left) and the new model of the more massive disk (0.03
M(cid:12); right). The abundance is defined as the ratio of the number density of CO with respect to the number density
of hydrogen nuclei (nH + 2nH2). After 2 Myr, the CO chemical depletion front moves inward to 20 AU, with the
surface layers more depleted than the disk midplane. Fig. 2 shows the abundances of major carbon-bearing species as
a function of time for the midplane at 40 AU in each disk, demonstrating the gradual chemical depletion of CO and
subsequent sequestration of carbon into organic ices. We note that our network is not extensive enough to determine
the exact end-product of organic ice formation. The most complex hydrocarbon we include is C2H5, which in reality
should hydrogenate to form ethane, and radicals of the form C2Hx should react with carbon atoms or hydrides to form
longer carbon chains. However, these complex products of organic grain surface chemistry are all less volatile than the
C2Hx species and would stay on the grain surfaces unless the grains drift radially inward (e.g. Birnstiel & Andrews
2014) or experience a transient heating event (e.g. Cody et al. 2017, Cieza et al. 2016, Vorobyov & Basu 2015). Since
almost all resolved T-Tauri disks detected in dust continuum emission have radii much larger than the ∼ 40 AU C2H5
0.00.51.01.52.02.53.00.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.5Time (Myr)Abundance(10−5)0.015 Msun disk (40AU, midplane)COCH4C2H2 iceH2CCO iceC2H5 iceCH3OH iceCO2 ice0.00.51.01.52.02.50.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.5Time (Myr)Abundance(10−5)0.03 Msun disk (40AU midplane)COCH4C2H2 iceH2CCO iceC2H5 iceCH3OH iceCO2 ice 5
ice line (Paper 1) in our models3, we do not expect radial drift to deposit a significant amount of organic gas that could
be recycled to form CO in the inner disk. To the extent that there are real astrophysical disks that evolve quiescently
during the T-Tauri phase, our conclusion that carbon liberated by CO chemical depletion becomes sequestered in ices
is robust. The more massive disk shows a similar pattern of CO chemical depletion to the disk presented in Paper 1,
though the depletion timescale is a bit longer because the higher column density decreases the ionization fraction -- and
thus the abundance of ionized helium -- in the midplane.
The net result of all chemical models presented here and in Paper 1 is that CO becomes severely depleted well inside
the CO freeze-out radius in disks with masses above the minimum needed to form planetary systems. Similar effects
have been seen in other chemical evolution calculations (Aikawa et al. 1997, 1999; Furuya & Aikawa 2014; Walsh et al.
2014; Bergin et al. 2014). Aikawa et al. (1997) and Aikawa et al. (1999) first pointed out that CO can react to form
less volatile molecules such as CO2, HCN, H2CO, CH4 and larger hydrocarbons over Myr timescales. Aikawa et al.
(1997) used a static disk (not evolving), and Aikawa et al. (1999) used a vertically isothermal model and found a larger
number of simple molecules as products (as opposed to a few complex molecules), but the essence of the chemical
depletion of CO is the same as found here and in Paper 1. Walsh et al. (2014) simulated the composition of complex
organic molecules in a disk with no temperature evolution for about 1 Myr and found the formation of complex organic
molecules in the disk midplane via grain-surface reactions, while Bergin et al. (2014) found gas-phase organic formation
and subsequent freezeout onto grain surfaces. Furuya & Aikawa (2014) investigated the carbon and nitrogen chemistry
during turbulent mixing, and found that volatile transport enhances COM formation near the surface and suppresses
it in the disk midplane. It is difficult to compare our results directly with the earlier calculations because our models
have different central star properties and less accretion heating, but it is clear that a variety of chemical processes can
force a disk's CO/H2 abundance ratio far from the interstellar value.
In Figure 3 we show the fraction of our model disk's carbon atoms contained in CO gas (fCO) as a function of time.
The fraction is initially low because evolution in the molecular cloud has sequestered carbon in ices; for a while these
evaporate, increasing fCO, but then CO chemical depletion and formation of icy organics cause fCO to decrease. To
complicate matters, the abundance of CO actually increases with time at small radii, as CO2 ice desorbs and dissociates
to form CO gas. Although the 0.015 M(cid:12) disk suffers more CO chemical depletion at larger radii, the re-formation of
CO gas in the inner disk also proceeds at a higher rate than in the 0.03 M(cid:12) disk, leading to a higher disk-averaged fCO
for the 0.015 M(cid:12) disk. These facts will compromise attempts to measure disk masses using CO isotopes (§4). Worse
yet, the CO abundance is a function of time, leading to an age-mass degeneracy in interpreting observations (§5).
Figure 3. The fraction of C in CO versus time, averaged over the disk, for both the disks, 0.015 M(cid:12) on the left, 0.030 M(cid:12) on
the right.
3. LINE RADIATIVE TRANSFER MODEL AND MASS ESTIMATES
In order to understand the effects of chemical evolution on CO emission, we set up radiative transfer models with the
publicly available code LIME (LIne Modeling Engine; Brinch & Hogerheijde 2010). LIME calculates either non-LTE
3 See the catalog of resolved disk images at www.circumstellardisks.org
6
or LTE line excitation and solves the radiative transfer problem for molecular gas in arbitrary 3D geometries. For
recent examples of studies using LIME, see Walsh et al. (2016) and Oberg et al. (2015). We adopt the energy levels
from the Leiden Atomic and Molecular Database (LAMDA)4. As a first order approximation, we do not consider the
hyperfine splitting in C17O emission.
As in Paper 1, we model emission from within a radius of 70 AU of the central star, which corresponds to a 1(cid:48)(cid:48)
beam diameter for an assumed distance of 140 pc from the Sun. We consider line broadening due to Keplerian
rotation, thermal velocity and micro-turbulence. Thermal velocities are calculated assuming a Maxwell-Boltzmann
speed distribution based on the disk's temperature structure from Paper 1. For the micro-turbulence, we again
assume an isotropic Maxwell-Boltzmann speed distribution with RMS of 100 m/s, consistent with the upper limit to
microturbulent speed found by Flaherty et al. (2015) in a fit to multiple CO emission lines in the HD 163296 disk. For
computing the level populations, we set a minimum scale of 0.07 AU to guarantee sub-pixel sampling of both Keplerian
speeds and CO abundance gradients. We first generate the synthetic datacube of intensity as a function of x, y, and
velocity for a disk around a 0.95 M(cid:12) star at 30◦ inclination, similar to the disk surrounding AS 209. In velocity space,
the spectra have 300 channels of 125 m/s resolution. At any specific velocity, the synthetic image contains 600 × 600
pixels of 0.003(cid:48)(cid:48) × 0.003(cid:48)(cid:48) in size. Finally, we generate the synthetic spectra presented here by integrating each velocity
component over a square with 1.2(cid:48)(cid:48) sides (400 × 400 pixels), larger than the angular size of the disk. The pixels not
covered by the disk contribute no flux and are included simply for ease of integration -- here we assume that the sky
background contains negligible flux compared with the disk at all wavelengths.
Our current models assume that the gas temperature is the same as the dust temperature. This is a valid assumption
in estimating the optical depth of C17O and C18O, as done in Paper 1, because the emission primarily comes from
disk midplane and the midplane is strongly shielded from UV radiation. However, hot gas on the disk surface is more
emissive, and we would need to consider the difference between the gas and dust temperature in order to use our
models to fit high-J spectral lines emitted from the disk surface. Similarly, we would need to revisit the temperature
calculation for a disk surrounding a star with a stronger UV field, which could decouple the gas and dust temperatures.
In Appendix A, we demonstrate that the LTE approximation is adequate for computing the energy level populations,
and show that the decreasing disk scale height has little effect on the computed line profiles (see §2). For our purposes,
we have adequately modeled the CO rare isotopologue emission, even though our models do not extend vertically
to a large number of scale heights. For the rest of the paper, we focus our line profile discussion on J = 3 → 2 and
J = 2 → 1, which are the most commonly observed transitions.
Figure 4 shows one set of results from our line radiative transfer models -- the time evolution of the J = 3 → 2
line profiles for three isotopologues and two model disks. Line profiles in Janskys are plotted as well as normalized
profiles, which better show the evolving shape of the lines (see §6.2 for more on diagnosing CO chemical depletion
by comparing line profiles from multiple isotopologues). Figure 5 shows the total intensities (integrated in velocity
space) of J = 3 → 2 emission from all CO isotopologues as a function of time. The decline with time is quite dramatic,
especially for the rarer isotopologues where it exceeds an order of magnitude over 3 Myr. The emission from rarer
isotopologues is very weak at later times, which can be expensive to observe, especially if one wants to achieve enough
signal-to-noise to study the line profiles.
Finally, we use standard observational procedures to try to recover the apparent masses of the disks, as an observer
would do. Here we will use the J = 2 → 1 line, as it is commonly used to obtain disk masses (e.g.,Williams & Best 2014,
though Ansdell et al. (2016) use the J = 3 → 2 line). We show in Appendix C that higher J transitions underestimate
the mass more severely than J = 2 → 1 and J = 3 → 2. From our model line profiles we calculate level populations,
total number of CO molecules, and finally gas mass. The equations used to derive the number of CO molecules in
each energy level (NJ ) from integrated line flux, assuming optically thin emission, are given in Appendix B. Values of
NJ can then be translated to mass with the following equations. The total number of CO molecules in the disk N is
given by
N =
× Q × eEup/T
(1)
NJ
gJ
where Eup is the upper-state energy of the transition in K and Q is the partition function, generally approximated by
Q = kT /hB (with B in Hz). Note that the temperature of the CO reservoir appears in both the exponential and the
partition function in Equation 1; in Appendix C.1 we show that no single temperature describes the CO reservoir. We
4 http://home.strw.leidenuniv.nl/ moldata/
7
Figure 4. Time evolution of emission line profiles, with 13CO on the left, C18O in the middle and C17O on the right. The top
6 panels show results for the fiducial 0.015 M(cid:12) model, and the bottom 6 panels show the results for the comparison 0.03 M(cid:12)
model. In each group, the top panels show the simulated lines, and the lower panels show the line profiles normalized to the
peak intensity of each line. The emission becomes weaker, and the line profile becomes wider over time for all isotopologues,
but the change is much more significant for the optically thin C18O and C17O emission.
then compute the mass of gas from
M =
N µHmHfiso
fCfCO
= 1.668 × 10−53M(cid:12) N fiso/fCO
(2)
where µH is the mean atomic weight of the ISM including He, mH is the mass of a hydrogen atom, fiso is the ratio
of the mass of the most common isotopologue (12C16O) to that of the one being used, fC is the abundance ratio of
carbon to hydrogen nuclei, and fCO is the fraction of C in CO, averaged over the disk. µH = 1.43 and our chemical
model has fC = 7.21 × 10−5.
In the next section we describe how equations 1 and 2 to obtain the correct mass of our model disk.
4. EVEN RARE CO ISOTOPOLOGUES UNDERESTIMATE DISK MASS
12C16O and 13C16O will be optically thick in disks, so the usual approach is to observe rarer isotopologues. At
first glance, the CO chemical depletion we predict might be expected to ameliorate optical depth problems, but the
concentration of CO to small radii increases optical depths there. At the same time, the chemical depletion of CO at
larger radii causes mass underestimates by lowering the value of fCO. The net result is that simple analysis fails for
the following reasons.
First, the usual assumption is that fCO = 1 inside the CO ice line, but our models challenge that assumption. Figure
3 shows how fCO varies with time, never rising above 0.3 (0.015 M(cid:12) disk) or 0.25 (0.03 M(cid:12) disk) and approaching
0.12 by 3 Myr. Since our disk does not include radii where CO itself would freeze, the low fCO is due to what we call
8
Figure 5. Total intensities of J=3 − 2 emission from various CO isotopologues as a function of time. Results from the fiducial
with 0.015 M(cid:12) are presented on the left, and those from the fiducial model with 0.03 M(cid:12) are presented on the right. In the
0.015 M(cid:12) model, the intensity of 13CO drops from 2.72Jy − km s−1 by 82% to 0.48Jy − km s−1 over the 3 Myr disk evolution,
and the intensity of C17O drops from 1.15Jy − km s−1 by 95% to 0.06Jy − km s−1.
chemical depletion. Alone, with no other error sources in equations 1 and 2, it will cause underestimates of disk mass
by factors of 3 to 8.
Second, the concentration of CO toward the inner disk means that temperatures, and hence partition functions, are
higher than usually assumed for much of the CO reservoir. The most common assumption for temperature is T = 20
K (e.g., Ansdell et al. 2016). A temperature averaged over the the model disk and weighted by the number density of
CO molecules ranges from 50 to 70 K, decreasing as the star and disk evolve, but stabilizing around 55 K for the 0.015
M(cid:12) disk after about 1 Myr because the increasing concentration of CO in the inner disk counteracts the dropping
luminosity of the star (Figure 6). If CO chemical depletion is operating in the outer disk, assuming T = 20 K for
the gas where CO is concentrated is never a good choice; it will systematically underestimate masses by a factor of
about 2. In disks around T-Tauri stars that are less luminous than the proto-sun at 3 Myr, or that receive a low
cosmic-ray flux so that cosmic ray-induced photons do not generate CO from CO2 gas in the inner disk, 20 K may
be appropriate, but we recommend constructing model-based temperature estimates for the CO reservoir rather than
making any assumptions. As a further complication, we show in Appendix C that rotation diagrams from multiple
transitions are not effective in determining the best temperature to assume.
Third, the increase in CO abundance in the inner disk causes optical depth effects where most of the CO actually
resides (see Fig. 10 of Paper 1). Even if we correct for the mean fCO and somehow find an accurate value of T averaged
over the CO reservoir, the standard analysis still underestimates the mass. Figure 7 shows the mass estimates from
different isotopes and analysis procedures versus time, along with the actual disk mass, which decreases slightly due
to disk spreading and accretion onto the star. The estimates with black symbols are computed with equations 1 and
2 and based on the assumption of optically thin emission in the J = 2 → 1 line of the listed isotopologues. They all
use the correct fCO and the mass-weighted CO temperature for our model -- information that would not be available
for astronomical sources -- yet they all still underestimate the gas mass substantially. The rarer isotopologues perform
best, suggesting that optical depth is the main culprit. The recent analysis of the Lupus disks (Ansdell et al. 2016) by
Miotello et al. (2017) also suggests optical depth effects, even after ratios of 13CO and C18O were used to correct for
optical depth. The apparent gas to dust ratio declines with increasing dust mass in their Figure 6; if the dust mass
is a reasonable proxy for disk mass, a more massive disk will have larger (and more complicated) effects from optical
depth. Our results indicate that models that do not account for the radial dependence of fCO will underestimate the
gas mass more severely for more massive disks, as observed in Figure 6 of Miotello et al. (2017).
9
Figure 6. The temperature versus time, weighted by the CO density, and averaged over the disk, for both the disks, 0.015 M(cid:12)
on the left, 0.030 M(cid:12) on the right.
4.1. Correcting for optical depth using multiple isotopologues
One approach to dealing with optical depth is to observe the same rotational transition in multiple isotopologues
(e.g., Williams & Best 2014; Miotello et al. 2016). We tried a simple correction for our 13CO-based mass estimate
by comparing with C18O, using the C18O/13CO line intensity ratios plus the initial isotope ratios from the chemical
model. This correction yielded the hollow green hexagons in Figure 7, which still underestimate disk mass badly,
performing only as well as C18O observations would on their own.
More sophisticated optical depth corrections can be made with fitting formulae that relate the J = 2 → 1 line
intensity of either 13CO or C18O (or their ratio) to the total disk mass, based on a suite of models (e.g., Williams
& Best 2014; Miotello et al. 2016). We placed our model line luminosities on Figure 7 (left panel) of the Williams
and Best models to estimate mass, producing the red points, which have no correction for fCO. They do well for
early times when the CO is more uniformly distributed over the disk, but underestimate the mass badly at later times
when fCO drops especially at larger radii. Most of our points lie near the top of their distribution of models, and
interpolation between mass models is uncertain by a factor of three. Second, we used the formulae in equation 2 with
coefficients in Table A.1 of Miotello et al. (2016) to estimate disk mass from luminosities of the J = 2 → 1 lines of
13CO and C18O. Those from 13CO underestimated the mass badly, but those from C18O did better (blue octagons).
In these comparisons, we adjusted their mass estimates to be consistent with our assumption about the atomic carbon
abundance, but not for the fraction of carbon in CO. In a recent paper, Miotello et al. (2017) find the same result;
applying their models to the Lupus data (Ansdell et al. 2016) data leads to very low gas to dust ratios (less than 10 in
most cases) unless CO is depleted. The Miotello et al. grid of chemical models was optimized to treat CO self-shielding
and isotopic fractionation, which our chemical models also include; the low gas/dust ratios implied by C18O and 13CO
observations must result from other CO-depletion pathways.
Clearly, both optical depth and CO chemical depletion must be accounted for when measuring disk masses: Figure
7 shows that measurements incorporating one correction, but not the other, will fail. For masses based on a single
emission line, so that no optical depth correction is possible, the isotopotologue that performs the best is C17O,
which underestimates the mass by a factor of 2-3 if the correct value of fCO is known (which it will not be in real
astrophysical situations). In Appendix C, we show that the J = 1 → 0 line does much better than the more commonly
used J = 2 → 1 or J = 3 → 2 lines. We believe that this is primarily due to its lower optical depth and lesser sensitivity
to temperature.
The combination of the models of Miotello et al. (2016) and our calculations of fCO would improve the mass estimates.
For example, if we use our "insider information" (i.e. model-derived knowledge) about fCO as a function of time for
our 0.015 M(cid:12) disk to further correct the masses from the formulae in Miotello et al. (2016), the resulting masses are
accurate to within a factor of two at all ages. Unfortunately, to apply this method to observations, one needs to know
the disk age. We explore the issues arising from that fact in the next section.
The time dependence of the fraction of C in CO (see Fig. 3) implies that one needs to know the disk age to apply
a mass correction factor. Ages of host stars are not generally known to better than ±1 Myr. Worse yet, the "age"
5. THE AGE-MASS DEGENERACY
10
Figure 7. The mass of the disk inferred from the simulated observations is plotted versus time. The actual mass is shown as
a solid line, while the masses inferred from equation 2 and the simulated emission from different isotopes and using different
analysis methods are shown as points. Colored points show mass estimates corrected for optical depth but not fCO, while black
points show masses corrected for fCO but not optical depth. Labels are explained in the text.
in our models is in some sense a chemical age because the speed of chemical evolution will depend on the ionization
sources. EXor outbursts and X-ray flares may also introduce brief periods of intense ionization (e.g. Audard et al.
2014). If we don't know the chemical age, there is an age-mass degeneracy -- a massive, old disk may look similar to
a young, less massive one in CO rare isotopologue emission. Figure 8 shows an example of the age-mass degeneracy.
The more massive disk reaches the same C18O/13CO total intensity ratio about 0.5 Myr later than the less massive
disk for both J = 3 → 2 and J = 2 → 1.
CO-based mass measurements are further complicated by the fact that the depletion occurs in the outer disk, where
most of the mass resides. The decline in CO isotopologue line intensity as a function of time is precipitous:
in the
0.015 M(cid:12) model, the intensity of 13CO J=3-2 emission drops from 2.72Jy − km s−1 by 82% to 0.48Jy − km s−1 over
the 3 Myr disk evolution, and the intensity of C17O J=3-2 drops by 95% from 1.15Jy − km s−1 to 0.06Jy − km s−1
(Fig. 5). For comparison, the total disk mass within 70 AU of the star drops by about 12% over 3 Myr and fCO drops
by a factor of 2-3. Clearly, a simple correction for fCO does not capture all of the decrease in line emission with time.
Without a good model of CO abundance as a function of radius and time, line-intensity measurements yield disk mass
estimates that are accurate to factor of two at best and are systematically underestimated.
6. DIAGNOSING CO CHEMICAL DEPLETION
In section 2 we demonstrated that the CO abundance decreases with both radius and time. In Section 4, we showed
that other effects add to the underestimation of disk mass and that the underestimate gets worse with age. Given
that star ages can be uncertain by over 1 Myr (e.g., Soderblom et al. 2014) -- the timescale over which we observe CO
depletion in our model -- interpreting CO observations requires a more direct CO chemical depletion indicator than
the star age. The need for a disk-based CO chemical depletion indicator is especially evident given the likelihood that
disks with different masses or incident cosmic-ray fluxes may evolve at different speeds.
We explore here three types of observations that can diagnose CO chemical depletion . First, isotopologue intensity
ratios for a transition change with time, revealing departures from the ISM CO/H2 ratio. Second, line profile shapes
for the most optically thin isotopologues, C17O and C18O, widen over time as the outer disk loses CO, while 13CO and
CO profile shapes evolve very little. Third, spatially resolved observations will reveal CO chemical depletion patterns.
While using intensity ratios to diagnose CO chemical depletion requires less observing time, high signal-to-noise line
profiles or spatially resolved observations contain valuable information that could allow observers to reconstruct the
radial distribution of CO gas. We present all three strategies here, beginning with intensity ratios.
6.1. How intensity ratios reveal CO chemical depletion
11
Figure 8. Ratio of total intensities of C18O and 13CO lines from for the 0.015 M(cid:12) and the 0.03 M(cid:12)disks. We show the results
for the J=2 − 1 lines on the left, and those for J = 3 − 2 lines on the right.
The relative strengths of emission lines for different isotopologues change significantly over time. This is because
different isotopologues react to the change in CO abundance differently due to their various optical depths. Re-
examining Figure 8, we see that after 1 Myr, the C18O/13CO intensity ratios decrease steadily as the disk-averaged
CO abundance declines monotonically (Fig. 3). One could use Figure 8 to estimate the chemical age of an observed
disk. However, the predicted intensity ratios are higher for the more massive disk, so there is still a 0.5 Myr uncertainty
in age, which propagates into a mass uncertainty.
Intensity ratios are the most rudimentary diagnostic of CO chemical depletion. Williams & Best (2014), Miotello
et al. (2014), and Miotello et al. (2016) show how isotope-selective photodissociation, varying disk radii, and CO
freezeout (or lack thereof) can affect intensity ratios, leading to a wide dispersion of C18O/13CO for disks of the same
mass.
6.2. How line profiles reveal CO chemical depletion
The line profiles contain information not available in the integrated intensities. Here we demonstrate how a compari-
son of normalized line profiles from 13CO and C18O or C17O can diagnose CO chemical depletion, even over a factor of
two range in disk mass. Figure 4 shows that the normalized line profiles of the rarer isotopologues become broader than
those of the more common isotopologues as time proceeds. Since CO chemical depletion happens primarily in the outer
part of the disk where Keplerian velocities are small, the fraction of radiation in the high-velocity line wings increases
with time for optically thin lines. Optically thick lines can mask CO chemical depletion: the CO column density has
to first decline to the τ ≈ 1 threshold (where τ is the optical depth in the line center) before intensity changes start
to track abundance changes. For the 0.015 M(cid:12) disk, the optically thin C17O and C18O emission tracks the changes in
CO column densities well, so that the line profile gets significantly broader after 1 Myr. 13CO (J = 3 → 2) emission is
optically thick well beyond the CO chemical depletion radius of ∼ 20 AU, so does not reveal reductions in CO column
density with time. Similar trends are found for the 0.03 M(cid:12) disk. Because of the relatively high column densities, the
change in C18O line profile is not obvious until 3 Myr, but C17O still tracks the reductions in CO column density very
well. Clearly, line profiles of rare isotopologues can diagnose CO chemical depletion .
However, emission line profiles reflect not only the CO/H2 abundance ratio, but the temperature and density
structure of the disk as well. The temperature of our model disk decreases with time due to the young star's dimming
12
as it moves down the Hayashi track, and the density structure changes as the disk viscously evolves. To isolate the
effect of CO depletion from density and temperature effects, we set up control models with a constant CO/H2 ratio
throughout the disk and compare the emission line profiles produced by these with those produced by our fiducial,
CO-depleted models. In the constant CO/H2 models, all atomic carbon available for gas-phase reactions is assumed to
be in CO, and relative abundances of CO isotopologues are determined only by the abundance ratios of the isotopes
(see Table 2 of Paper 1). The abundances normalized to the total proton density are 7.21 × 10−5 for CO, 9.34 × 10−7
for 13CO, 1.44 × 10−7 for C18O, and 3.13 × 10−8 for C17O.
Figure 9. A comparison of normalized emission line profiles for various isotopologues are shown for the chemical evolution
model and the constant CO model. In the constant CO model, all carbon available for gas phase reactions is assumed to be in
CO, and abundances of CO isotopologues are assumed to be determined by atomic abundances of the isotopes.
Figure 9 shows side-by-side normalized line profiles for the 0.015 M(cid:12) disk with evolving chemistry and the one
with constant fCO. By 2 Myr, the profiles of rare isotopologues are noticeably wider than those of more common
isotopologues and by 3 Myr, they are quite distinctive. These line profiles comparisons would provide clear evidence
for ongoing CO chemical depletion and a potential way to correct for it (though there may be multiple rings of gas in
some disks, which would complicate the line profile analysis; see Cleeves 2016). However, the actual (un-normalized)
lines are very weak (Fig. 4), so diagnosing CO chemical depletion by comparing line profiles would be an expensive
method in terms of observing time. Furthermore, variation in turbulent speeds between different layers of the disk
could also produce different line profiles for 13CO, C18O, and C17O (Flaherty et al. 2015; Simon et al. 2015), an effect
we have not explored here.
Our chemical evolution models also predict a characteristic radial dependence of the CO abundance. To translate
this dependence into observables, we average the velocity-integrated, continuum-subtracted emission from our model
6.3. Spatial distributions of CO isotopologues
13
disks in rings of 2 AU in radius, and compare the spatial distributions of the J = 2 → 1 emission line from the fiducial
models to that from the constant CO models in Figure 10. The models shown in Figure 10 were run in face-on
geometry for simplicity; all other simulated emission in the paper is calculated for 30◦ inclination. The optical depth
effects are enhanced in the face-on disks because the lines are not spread out by rotation. If a disk inclination angle
is known, models could be run for that situation.
Results from the fiducial 0.015 M(cid:12) disk are presented in the upper-left (early time), upper-right (2 Myr), and lower-
left (3 Myr) panels. At the beginning of the evolution, the integrated intensities are lower in the fiducial model but the
profiles are very similar to those in the constant CO disk for all isotopes. This is because part of the carbon is locked
in CO2 in the fiducial model, whereas the constant CO model has all available carbon in CO. As the disk evolves, the
intensities beyond 20 AU decrease dramatically in the fiducial model due to the depletion of CO, and the differences
between the fiducial model and the constant CO model are the greatest for C17O lines, which have the lowest optical
depth. We see sharp drops of intensity in models with 0.03 M(cid:12) (lower right) as well. However because the chemical
depletion happens more slowly in the 0.03 M(cid:12) disk, the intensity profiles at 3 Myr of the 0.03 M(cid:12) disk resemble those
of the 0.015 M(cid:12) disk at 2 Myr.
The effect of age is detectable with ALMA given enough integration time. We plot the time evolution of 13CO
and C18O lines for the 0.015M(cid:12) disk in Figure 11, and the detection limit as a horizontal line at log = −6.27. At
resolution, we get to 540 mJy in 1 km/s resolution in 10 hours. At 0.(cid:48)(cid:48)03 spatial resolution, with a velocity channel of
width 1 km/s , we reach a sensitivity of 540 mJy per beam in 10 hours. The line width for a perfectly face-on disk
could be small, but it only takes a small inclination angle to significantly broaden the lines (for example, it takes only
6 degrees for Keplerian velocity to broaden the line to 1 km/s at 10 AU around a solar mass star). 0.(cid:48)(cid:48)03 will resolve
4.2 AU at 140 AU and matches our resolution in the figure. For the purpose of illustration, we use the J = 2 → 1 lines
from a disk of 30◦ inclination. The apparent edge of the disk in 13CO moves from beyond 70 AU to about 55 AU, and
from beyond 70 AU to about 20 AU in C18O emission, well within the condensation front of CO in both cases. The
migration of the "fake" snowline is a combined effect of the drop of CO emission intensities from the outer disk and
the detection limit of the observation.
In disks where spatially resolved imaging is possible, a comparison between the C18O and the CO or 13CO spatial
distribution should reveal CO chemical depletion, and may even provide enough information to re-construct the CO
distribution with the help of a chemical model. Finally, after 3 Myr of evolution, we see that two rings of C2H have
formed in the surface layers of the disk: a narrow ring at 1 − 3 AU and a broader ring at 10 − 20 AU. Bergin et al.
(2016) found that C2H formation is possible only with a strong UV field and C/O> 1, conditions which are replicated
in our model disk surface layers due in part to the breakdown of CO molecules. We will explore the detectability of
the C2H rings and the degree to which they may indicate CO depletion in future work.
7. CONSEQUENCES FOR OBSERVATIONS
Our main result is that current observations and interpretations of CO isotopologues toward disks around solar-mass
stars likely underestimate gas masses by substantial amounts. The surveys so far have emphasized shallow observations
of many disks with modest spatial resolution. For example, Ansdell et al. (2016) surveyed 89 protoplanetary disks
in Lupus with ALMA and found very low gas masses when assuming an ISM CO abundance. The analysis of those
observations has led to the conclusion that almost no disks have masses that exceed the MMSN. This result would
appear to conflict with the high fraction of stars with evidence for planetary systems.
Our predicted line intensities are weak, and deriving correct masses requires deeper integrations to obtain either line
profiles of weak lines or very high spatial resolution. Until those observations are available, we can offer only rough
estimates of how much more massive the disks may be. As an example, we ask the following question: if we apply a
simple correction for fCO, how many of the disks in Table 3 of Ansdell et al. (2016) might contain the mass of 0.01
M(cid:12), the MMSN. If the mean age of stars in Lupus is 3 ± 2 Myr, we should use fCO = 0.136, the value at 3 Myr
for the 0.015 M(cid:12)disk, the closest to a MMSN. After applying this correction factor, 7 of 36 best guess masses exceed
the MMSN, and 26 of 36 maximum masses exceed the MMSN, where best guess and maximum masses are defined
by Ansdell et al. Within the uncertainties, a significant fraction of the disks in Lupus could contain enough mass to
make a planetary system like ours. Recent analysis of similar observations toward disks in Cha I indicate a deficit of
gas mass similar to, or worse than, that seen in the Lupus disks (Feng et al. 2017). For an age of 2 Myr and the 0.015
M(cid:12) disk, the value of fCO is 0.18, which could increase the masses by a factor of about 5, leaving almost all disks in
Cha I still short of the MMSN. Almost all these stars are lower in mass than our model star; models tuned to these
stellar parameters would be needed to draw further conclusions.
CO chemical depletion also affects estimates of gas/dust mass ratios. Assuming an ISM-like CO/H2 abundance
14
Figure 10. Logarithm of the azimuthally averaged, velocity-integrated intensities of the J = 2 → 1 line as a function of radius.
For a 10 km baseline, ALMA has a 0.(cid:48)(cid:48)03 resolution for the J = 2 → 1 line.
ratio, Ansdell et al. (2016) found a wide range of gas/dust ratios, with a median ratio of ∼ 15, which is much smaller
than the canonical value of 100 observed in the ISM. Miotello et al. (2017) have shown that this problem persists when
their models with radiative transfer and isotope-selective photodissociation are used.
We argue that the low gas-to-dust ratios measured in Ansdell et al. (2016) are likely a result of a low CO/H2 ratio
due to CO chemical depletion. In our 0.015 M(cid:12)disk model, the closest to a MMSN, only 13.6% of carbon is contained
in CO gas by 3 Myr. If the mean age of stars in Lupus is 3± 2 Myr, and we apply the simple correction for CO fraction
(fCO= 0.136) to the Lupus data with both 13CO and C18O detections, we obtain gas-to-dust ratios of 53 to 1700,
with a median gas-to-dust ratio of 108. The gas-to-dust ratios correcting for the fraction of C in CO in our models
are plotted in Fig. 12.
The high values of the gas-to-dust ratios in the fCO corrected gas-to-dust ratios could be a combined result from
grain growth, weak-ionizing environments, and young disk ages. Gas/dust mass ratios are not necessarily the same
as gas/solid mass ratios: the apparent dust mass is typically calculated from sub-mm dust emission, which is mostly
sensitive to dust grains around sub-mm size or smaller. Once dust grains grow into cm-size pebbles, the reduction of
15
Figure 11. Time evolution of 13CO and C18O J = 2 → 1 lines for the 0.015 M(cid:12) model at 30 degree inclination. All other
parameters are the same as the above figure.
Figure 12. Corrected gas-to-dust ratios of the 11 stars in Ansdell et al. (2016) with both 13CO and C18O detections. Red dots
are values corrected for the CO fraction of 0.138, and blue squares are values corrected for both the CO fraction and the fraction
of solids in dust (10%). The stars are in the order as presented in Ansdell et al. (2016) (shown as the sample number in Fig. 12)
and the ordering has no particular meaning. The blue dashed line shows the ISM value of 100. The ISM value falls into the
possible range of gas to dust ratio for 7 out of 11 stars.
observable dust mass could drive the gas/dust mass ratio to larger than the canonical molecular cloud value of 100.
If only 10% of the solid mass is in the form of dust observable in 890 µm, as we assume in our models, one would
have to correct for the "dust fraction" (fdust) when measuring the gas-to-dust ratios. We apply the correction for
16
dust fraction on the fCO corrected data, and plot the gas-to-dust ratios as blue squares in Fig. 12. Most the disks
with high gas-to-dust ratios from the fCO corrections can be come consistent with the ISM value of 100 if additional
corrections for grain growth are included.
Instead of assuming that dust evolution or disk clearing drives the variation in observed Lupus gas/dust ratios, we
point to the large age spread of pre-main-sequence stars in Lupus. Ansdell et al. quote 1-3 Myr, while Mortier et al.
(2011) find either 0.1 to > 15 Myr or 0.3 to > 15 Myr depending on the model isochrones (though the > 10 Myr objects
were not detected by Ansdell et al. and are therefore not represented in Figure 12). The large spread of gas/dust
ratios calculated by Ansdell et al. is likely the result of the variation of CO/H2 abundance ratio with protostellar age.
Given the uncertainties in both gas and solid mass, the data so far do not rule out ISM gas/dust ratios.
There are a few caveats to bear in mind regarding these simple mass correction factors. First, real disks evolve
at different rates: a disk with a high incident cosmic-ray flux loses CO more quickly than a disk shielded by a "T-
Tauriosphere" that deflects cosmic rays (Cleeves et al. 2013, 2015). Even if star ages could be measured perfectly, the
ages alone do not give enough information about the chemical evolutionary stage of the disk to compute a CO/H2
ratio. In other words, our line profile diagnostics are measuring a "chemical age." Comparison of 13CO and C18O line
profiles gives an empirical diagnostic of the level of CO chemical depletion .
Second, chemical depletion of CO operates on a million-year timescale. If episodic accretion of the type observed in
FU Orionis outbursts happens during the T-Tauri phase at intervals smaller than ∼ 1 Myr (e.g., Dunham et al. 2010;
Kim et al. 2012; Martin et al. 2012; Green et al. 2013), desorption of CO2 ice followed by CO2 dissociation from cosmic
ray-induced photons could raise the CO gas abundance throughout the disk, not just in the inner 20 AU as in our
current model disk. Cieza et al. (2016) have already proposed chemical alteration in the disk surrounding V883 Ori,
which is now mid-outburst. We have not modeled FU Orionis outbursts -- our model T-Tauri star evolves smoothly on
the Hayashi track.
Other processes may further deplete CO in the outer regions of disks. For example, Xu et al. (2017) describe a
process of "runaway freeze-out", which considers vertical transport at fixed radii. They find that higher layers, too
warm for freeze-out, can become depleted by transport to the colder, lower layers. Kama et al. (2016a) suggest the
same mechanism to explain the low atomic C and O abundances in the TW Hya disk. Applied to CO, the vertical
transport/freezeout effect would primarily act at larger radii than we consider and affect primarily the emission from
the more common, hence more optically thick, isotopes. Applied to the complex organics that sequester the carbon in
our models, runaway freezeout could remove even more carbon from the gas phase, allowing for even higher H2 masses
to be consistent with observed gas-phase carbon abundances.
Our model's growing CO abundance in the inner disk and CO chemical depletion in the outer disk would be
observationally almost identical to a disk with CO frozen onto grain surfaces in the outer disk, followed by inward
radial drift of the grains and desorption of CO in the warm inner disk. The radial-transport effect, first applied to
water ice, has been suggested on theoretical (Ciesla & Cuzzi 2006; Du et al. 2015) and observational (Hogerheijde
et al. 2011; Kama et al. 2016b) grounds, diagnosed from the presence of rings of small hydrocarbon chains (Bergin
et al. 2016) and ammonia gas (Salinas et al. 2016) in the outer disk of TW Hya, and inferred in cases where C/O> 1
(Bergin et al. 2016). Robust temperature measurements in the outer disk would be required to distinguish between
chemical CO chemical depletion and CO freezeout followed by grain inspiral.
Our key findings and suggestions for observing strategies are summarized below.
8. CONCLUSIONS
1. CO abundance varies both with distance from the star and as a function of time as CO is dissociated and the
carbon gets sequestered in organic molecules that freeze onto grain surfaces (chemical depletion) on a million
year time scale (§2). CO chemical depletion will cause very large underestimates in gas mass and gas-to-dust
ratios when CO observations are used. One would need to correct for the chemical depletion of CO in order to
correctly estimate the disk gas mass. The CO abundance correction factor ranges from 3 to 8 for the models we
have run (§4).
2. Even though CO is destroyed by ionized helium throughout most of the disk, it has a higher-than-interstellar
abundance in the inner 20 AU of the disk, where the temperature is relatively high. Adopting a constant
T = 20 K for the CO reservoir will underestimate gas masses by a further factor of about 2 (§4).
3. The high CO abundance in the inner disk also results in high optical depth even for the mostly optically thin
isotopologue we investigated (C17O), and one could underestimate the disk gas mass due to the optical depth
17
effect even after correcting for the CO chemical depletion in the outer disk and using the correct CO-averaged
temperature (§4).
4. The CO-abundance time evolution also introduces a disk age-mass degeneracy -- a massive, old disk may look
similar to a young, less massive one in CO rare isotopologue emission (§5).
5. One can diagnose CO chemical depletion by comparing the line intensity ratios (§6.1) or emission line profiles of
multiple isotopologues (§6.2). If the disk is spatially resolved, one can also use spatial distribution of CO beyond
20 AU to probe the chemical depletion of CO. (§6.3).
6. Very different CO optical depths in different parts of the disk produce a complicated rotation diagram that does
not probe the disk temperature well. One would underestimate the average temperature of CO molecules by
deriving it from the lowest two J values (§C.1).
7. Higher-J lines underestimate the disk mass by more than do lower-J lines. The higher-J lines miss low tem-
perature gas. We suggest using low excitation lines (e.g., J = 1 → 0) to estimate the disk mass to minimize the
temperature and optical depth effects. (§C.2).
8. The strategy that comes closest to recovering the correct mass for our models is to use the formulae from Miotello
et al. (2016) and to divide by the fCO from our models (§4).
9. If we correct the "best-guess" gas masses in Ansdell et al. (2016) by the smallest value of fCO (the value at 3
Myr for the 0.015 M(cid:12) disk), 7 of the disks could have masses of the MMSN; if we apply our fCO correction to the
maximum masses, 26 of 36 could reach the MMSN (§7). The age of Lupus is 3±2 Myr (Alcal´a et al. 2014), so this
correction is reasonable. A recent survey of disks in Cha I suggest almost no disks with MMSN masses. While
still problematic for planet formation models, correcting for CO chemical depletion suggests better numbers than
finding that no disks contain the MMSN.
10. Given reasonable uncertainties in both gas and solid masses, many observed disks can have gas/dust ratios
consistent with the ISM value of 100 (§7).
Work by MY, KW, SDR and NJT was supported by NASA grant NNX10AH28G and further work by MY and SDR
was supported by NSF grant 1055910. This work was performed in part at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California
Institute of Technology. NJT was supported by grant 13-OSS13-0114 from the NASA Origins of Solar Systems program.
MY was supported by a Continuing Fellowship from the University of Texas at Austin. We acknowledge helpful input
from L. Cleeves, E. Bergin, E. F. van Dishoeck, K. Oberg, J. Huang, M. Ansdell, and A. Kraus. We are grateful for
Feng Long et al. sharing their paper in advance of publication, and Huang et al. sharing processed ALMA data for
our model comparison.
Software: RADMC (http://www.ita.uni-heidelberg.de/ dullemond/software/radmc-3d/), LIME (Brinch & Hoger-
heijde 2010)
REFERENCES
Aikawa, Y., Umebayashi, T., Nakano, T., & Miyama, S. M. 1997,
Audard, M., ´Abrah´am, P., Dunham, M. M., et al. 2014,
ApJL, 486, L51
-- . 1999, ApJ, 519, 705
Alcal´a, J. M., Natta, A., Manara, C. F., et al. 2014, A&A, 561,
A2
Alexander, R., Pascucci, I., Andrews, S., Armitage, P., & Cieza,
Protostars and Planets VI, 387
Bergin, E., Ilsedore Cleeves, L., Crockett, N., & Blake, G. 2014,
Faraday Discuss., 168, 61
Bergin, E. A., Du, F., Cleeves, L. I., et al. 2016, ApJ, 831, 101
Bergin, E. A., Cleeves, L. I., Gorti, U., et al. 2013, Nature, 493,
L. 2014, Protostars and Planets VI, 475
644
Andrews, S. M., Rosenfeld, K. A., Kraus, A. L., & Wilner, D. J.
2013, ApJ, 771, 129
Andrews, S. M., & Williams, J. P. 2005, ApJ, 631, 1134
-- . 2007, ApJ, 659, 705
Andrews, S. M., Wilner, D. J., Hughes, A. M., et al. 2012, ApJ,
744, 162
Birnstiel, T., Dullemond, C. P., & Brauer, F. 2009, A&A, 503, L5
Birnstiel, T., Ormel, C. W., & Dullemond, C. P. 2011, A&A,
525, A11
Boneberg, D. M., Pani´c, O., Haworth, T. J., Clarke, C. J., &
Min, M. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 385
Brauer, F., Dullemond, C. P., & Henning, T. 2008, A&A, 480,
Ansdell, M., Williams, J. P., van der Marel, N., et al. 2016, ApJ,
859
828, 46
Brinch, C., & Hogerheijde, M. R. 2010, A&A, 523, A25
18
Bruderer, S., van Dishoeck, E. F., Doty, S. D., & Herczeg, G. J.
2012, A&A, 541, A91
Meeus, G., Salyk, C., Bruderer, S., et al. 2013, A&A, 559, A84
Miotello, A., Bruderer, S., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2014, A&A,
Chapillon, E., Guilloteau, S., Dutrey, A., & Pi´etu, V. 2008,
572, A96
A&A, 488, 565
Ciesla, F. J., & Cuzzi, J. N. 2006, Icarus, 181, 178
Cieza, L. A., Casassus, S., Tobin, J., et al. 2016, Nature, 535, 258
Cleeves, L. I. 2016, ApJL, 816, L21
Cleeves, L. I., Adams, F. C., & Bergin, E. A. 2013, ApJ, 772, 5
Cleeves, L. I., Bergin, E. A., Qi, C., Adams, F. C., & Oberg,
K. I. 2015, ApJ, 799, 204
D'Angelo, G., Weidenschilling, S. J., Lissauer, J. J., &
Bodenheimer, P. 2014, Icarus, 241, 298
Dartois, E., Dutrey, A., & Guilloteau, S. 2003, A&A, 399, 773
Dodson-Robinson, S. E., & Bodenheimer, P. 2010, Icarus, 207,
491
Drozdovskaya, M. N., Walsh, C., van Dishoeck, E. F., et al. 2016,
MNRAS, 462, 977
Du, F., Bergin, E. A., & Hogerheijde, M. R. 2015, ApJL, 807,
L32
Dullemond, C. P., & Dominik, C. 2005, A&A, 434, 971
Dunham, M. M., Evans, II, N. J., Terebey, S., Dullemond, C. P.,
& Young, C. H. 2010, ApJ, 710, 470
Dutrey, A., Guilloteau, S., & Simon, M. 2003, A&A, 402, 1003
Favre, C., Cleeves, L. I., Bergin, E. A., Qi, C., & Blake, G. A.
2013, ApJL, 776, L38
Fedele, D., Bruderer, S., van Dishoeck, E. F., et al. 2013, ApJL,
776, L3
Fedele, D., van Dishoeck, E. F., Kama, M., Bruderer, S., &
Hogerheijde, M. R. 2016, A&A, 591, A95
Flaherty, K. M., Hughes, A. M., Rosenfeld, K. A., et al. 2015,
ApJ, 813, 99
Furuya, K., & Aikawa, Y. 2014, ApJ, 790, 97
Garaud, P., Meru, F., Galvagni, M., & Olczak, C. 2013, ApJ,
764, 146
Gorti, U., Liseau, R., S´andor, Z., & Clarke, C. 2016, SSRv, 205,
125
Green, J. D., Evans, II, N. J., K´osp´al, ´A., et al. 2013, ApJ, 772,
117
Haisch, Jr., K. E., Lada, E. A., & Lada, C. J. 2001, ApJL, 553,
L153
Hayashi, C. 1981, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement,
70, 35
Hogerheijde, M. R., Bergin, E. A., Brinch, C., et al. 2011,
Science, 334, 338
Hollenbach, D. J., Yorke, H. W., & Johnstone, D. 2000,
Protostars and Planets IV, 401
Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., & Lissauer, J. J. 2005, Icarus,
179, 415
Ida, S., & Lin, D. N. C. 2004, ApJ, 616, 567
Kama, M., Bruderer, S., van Dishoeck, E. F., et al. 2016a, A&A,
592, A83
-- . 2016b, A&A, 592, A83
Kim, H. J., Evans, II, N. J., Dunham, M. M., Lee, J.-E., &
Pontoppidan, K. M. 2012, ApJ, 758, 38
Landry, R., Dodson-Robinson, S. E., Turner, N. J., & Abram, G.
2013, ApJ, 771, 80
Lissauer, J. J., Hubickyj, O., D'Angelo, G., & Bodenheimer, P.
2009, Icarus, 199, 338
Martin, R. G., Lubow, S. H., Livio, M., & Pringle, J. E. 2012,
MNRAS, 423, 2718
McClure, M. K., Bergin, E. A., Cleeves, L. I., et al. 2016, ApJ,
831, 167
Miotello, A., van Dishoeck, E. F., Kama, M., & Bruderer, S.
2016, A&A, 594, A85
Miotello, A., van Dishoeck, E. F., Williams, J. P., et al. 2017,
A&A, 599, A113
Mortier, A., Oliveira, I., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2011, MNRAS,
418, 1194
Muzerolle, J., Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., & D'Alessio, P. 2003,
ApJL, 597, L149
Oberg, K. I., Guzm´an, V. V., Furuya, K., et al. 2015, Nature,
520, 198
Oberg, K. I., Murray-Clay, R., & Bergin, E. A. 2011, ApJL, 743,
L16
Oliveira, I., Pontoppidan, K. M., Mer´ın, B., et al. 2010, ApJ,
714, 778
P´erez, L. M., Carpenter, J. M., Chandler, C. J., et al. 2012,
ApJL, 760, L17
Pollack, J. B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., et al. 1996, Icarus,
124, 62
Qi, C., Oberg, K. I., Wilner, D. J., et al. 2013, Science, 341, 630
Salinas, V. N., Hogerheijde, M. R., Bergin, E. A., et al. 2016,
A&A, 591, A122
Schwarz, K. R., Bergin, E. A., Cleeves, L. I., et al. 2016, ApJ,
823, 91
Semenov, D., Henning, T., Helling, C., Ilgner, M., & Sedlmayr,
E. 2003, A&A, 410, 611
Simon, J. B., Hughes, A. M., Flaherty, K. M., Bai, X.-N., &
Armitage, P. J. 2015, ApJ, 808, 180
Soderblom, D. R., Hillenbrand, L. A., Jeffries, R. D., Mamajek,
E. E., & Naylor, T. 2014, Protostars and Planets VI, 219
Stewart, S. T., & Leinhardt, Z. M. 2012, ApJ, 751, 32
Thommes, E. W., Matsumura, S., & Rasio, F. A. 2008, Science,
321, 814
van der Wiel, M. H. D., Naylor, D. A., Kamp, I., et al. 2014,
MNRAS, 444, 3911
van Zadelhoff, G.-J., van Dishoeck, E. F., Thi, W.-F., & Blake,
G. A. 2001, A&A, 377, 566
Visser, R., van Dishoeck, E. F., Doty, S. D., & Dullemond, C. P.
2009, A&A, 495, 881
Wada, K., Tanaka, H., Suyama, T., Kimura, H., & Yamamoto,
T. 2008, ApJ, 677, 1296
-- . 2009, ApJ, 702, 1490
Walsh, C., Millar, T. J., Nomura, H., et al. 2014, A&A, 563, A33
Walsh, C., Loomis, R. A., Oberg, K. I., et al. 2016, ApJL, 823,
L10
Weidenschilling, S. J. 1977, Ap&SS, 51, 153
Williams, J. P., & Best, W. M. J. 2014, ApJ, 788, 59
Williams, J. P., & Cieza, L. A. 2011, ARA&A, 49, 67
Windmark, F., Birnstiel, T., Ormel, C. W., & Dullemond, C. P.
2012, A&A, 544, L16
Woodall, J., Ag´undez, M., Markwick-Kemper, A. J., & Millar,
T. J. 2007, A&A, 466, 1197
Woods, P. M., & Willacy, K. 2009, ApJ, 693, 1360
Xu, R., Bai, X.-N., & Oberg, K. 2017, ApJ, 835, 162
Yu, M., Willacy, K., Dodson-Robinson, S. E., Turner, N. J., &
Evans, II, N. J. 2016, ApJ, 822, 53
Zsom, A., Ormel, C. W., Guttler, C., Blum, J., & Dullemond,
C. P. 2010, A&A, 513, A57
19
APPENDIX
A. SENSITIVITY TO MODEL PARAMETERS
The effect of our assumption of LTE in the CO level populations and the fixed vertical grid are explored in the next
two sub-sections.
A.1. LTE vs. NLTE
LIME is capable of computing energy level populations either in local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) or in the
more complex non-LTE case, where the kinetic temperature and excitation temperature are different. In Paper 1,
the lowest density found in the modeled region within 70 AU of the star is about 109 hydrogen molecules per cubic
centimeter. Even in the most diffuse regions of our model disk, the density should be high enough for collisions to
dominate CO excitation so that LTE is a good approximation for the energy level population.
We demonstrate that the LTE approximation is appropriate for our model disk by comparing the results of LTE
and non-LTE models for different CO isotopologues at multiple epochs. For each emission line of each isotopologue,
the line profiles from the two models are indistinguishable. In figure A1 we show the worst case example of C17O
J=6 − 5 emission at the beginning of the disk evolution. The high excitation energy of the J=6 − 5 transition means
the LTE approximation requires a high collision rate and is hardest to satisfy, yet the differences between the LTE
and non-LTE line profiles are still negligible.
Figure A1. C17O J=2 − 1 rotational emission at the beginning of the evolution.
A.2. Definition of the disk surface
Another parameter that can influence the computed line profiles is the placement of the disk surface. In the disk
models of Landry et al. (2013), on which the chemical models in Paper 1 are based, the top surface of the computational
grid is placed at the layer where the Rosseland mean optical depth to the disk's own radiation, integrated downward
from infinity, is 0.2. The τ = 0.2 surface is located between one and two pressure scale heights above the disk midplane,
depending on the distance from the star and time. Since most of the low-J CO emission comes from the disk interior
where the bulk of the disk mass is located, the height of the grid surface should have minimal effect on the line profiles.
For higher values of J, more of the emission would come from the warm surface and modeling line profiles accurately
would require the computational grid to extend well into the tenuous disk atomsphere. Here we assess the effects of
grid surface placement on our model emission line intensities and profiles.
20
The chemical model in Paper 1 uses a static grid that does not evolve with time. Grid cells are spaced logarithmically
in radius r and linearly in aspect ratio z/r. At the beginning of evolution, which roughly corresponds to the start of the
T-Tauri phase, the disk has a high scale height due to heating from the luminous protostar. The scale height decreases
throughout the 3 Myr evolution due to both protostellar dimming and viscous dissipation. As the disk flattens, grid
layers with high z/r begin to empty out. To test the effect of surface placement on the radiative transfer calculation,
we construct a new disk model by artificially removing the top three filled (not empty) z/R layers from each time
snapshot of our fiducial model from Paper 1. At six different epochs, we compute line profiles for the 1 → 0, 2 → 1,
3 → 2, 4 → 3, 5 → 4, and 6 → 5 transitions for all CO isotopologues using both the new "remove-top" model and the
fiducial model. Removing emitting layers affects the peak intensities of the optically thin C17O emission lines more
than any other isotopologue. To verify that our radiative transfer models capture essentially all of the disk emission,
we demonstrate how the grid surface placement affects C17O.
At the beginning of disk evolution, the top three grid layers contain very little mass and have little effect on the
emission line intensity or profile (Figure A2, left panel). As the the disk cools and the top grid layers empty out, the
mass contained in the filled grid layers increases. Line profiles from the fiducial and remove-top models differ the most
after 3 Myr of evolution (Figure A2, right panel). Yet even at 3 Myr, the difference in the J = 3 → 2 peak intensity
between the remove-top and the fiducial model would be difficult to distinguish in observations, and the normalized
line profiles are almost identical.
The differences in peak intensities between the fiducial and remove-top models become significant for higher-J
emission due to the higher energy needed to populate the upper state. For example, the peak intensity for J = 6 → 5
differs by roughly 33% between the fiducial and remove-top models at 3 Myr of evolution. However, lower J lines
(J = 1 → 0 to 3 → 2) are more commonly used for disk studies. In this paper, we focus our line profile discussion
on J = 3 → 2 and J = 2 → 1 transitions, which are the most observationally relevant transitions. For our purposes,
we have adequately modeled the CO rare isotopologue emission, even though our models do not extend vertically to
a large number of scale heights.
Figure A2. A comparison of J=3− 2 emission from C17O between the fiducial models and models with the top-3 existing layers
artificially removed. Left panels: the beginning of the evolution; right panels: the end of the evolution. The upper panels show
the simulated emission lines and the lower panels show the line profiles normalized by the total line intensities. Removing the
top-3 layers of the disk surface does not change the spectral line profiles at the beginning of the evolution. However, the mass
contained in the surface layers increases as the disk surface moves closer to the midplane over time, and line intensities of the
surface-removed model are slightly lower across all frequencies/velocities at the end of the evolution. The effects of removing
the top 3 layers on the line profile remains negligible for low-J emission.
B. MEASURING DISK MASS FROM THE INTEGRATED INTENSITIES OF CO ISOTOPOLOGUES
For optically thin emission lines, the total number of molecules per degenerate sublevel in the upper state can be
written simply as
NJ
gJ
=
LJ
gJ AJ hν
(B1)
21
where LJ is the line luminosity, gJ is the degeneracy, AJ is the Einstein A value for the transition from upper state
with quantum number J, h is Planck's constant, and ν is the frequency of the transition. LJ is related to the integrated
line flux Fl as
LJ = Fl(cgs) × 4πD2
cm = 1.1964 × 1020 × Fl(Jy − km s−1) (ν/c)D2
pc,
(B2)
where Dcm and Dpc are the star's distance in cm and pc, respectively, and c is the speed of light. For the last part
of Eq. B2 and Eq. B4, Fl is in the unit of Jy − km s−1, Dpc is in the unit of pc, and all the other values are in cgs
units. The Einstein A value for rotational transitions from level J to level J − 1 is given by
× (ν/c)3 × µ(J, J − 1)2 = 3.13613 × 10−7 × (ν/c)3
AJ =
(B3)
where µ(J, J − 1) is the electric dipole matrix element and µD is the dipole moment measured in Debye (10−18
esu-cm). Combining these, we can write
NJ
gJ
= 6.468 × 1045 Fl(Jy − km s−1)Dpc
(2J + 1)
(B4)
BGHz
3J 4µD
2
J
2
µD
64π4
3h
2
where BGHz is the rotation constant in GHz. The values of BGHz vary slightly with the isotopologue and are easily
obtained from on-line sources, but for reference, BGHz ≈ 55 to 58 GHz for the isotopes discussed here.
C. DOES A SINGLE TEMPERATURE CHARACTERIZE THE CO EMISSION?
C.1. Temperature Estimates from Rotation Diagrams
A temperature estimate is required in order to evaluate the partition function that will translate observed intensities
into gas column densities. While the disk temperature can reach ∼ 1400 K at the dust sublimation front (Muzerolle
et al. 2003), Andrews & Williams (2005) and Andrews et al. (2013) suggest that most submillimeter emission comes
from dust at ∼ 20 − 25 K and a fixed temperature of 20 K for the gas is often used in the simplest methods to
measure mass. Here we will use plots of level populations versus energy of the level above ground -- called rotation
diagrams for rotational transitions -- to test whether CO in our model disk is well characterized by a single temperature.
We calculate the rotation diagrams for the 0.015 M(cid:12) disk and the 0.03 M(cid:12) disk using the equations in Appendix B,
following the method of Green et al. (2013). Note that the emission must be optically thin (which is often assumed
for CO isotopologues) for luminosity to be directly proportional to the upper state population.
Figure C3 shows the 13CO rotation diagram of our 0.015 M(cid:12) model disk (left, circles) and our 0.03 M(cid:12) model
disk (right), both after 2 Myr of evolution. A gas reservoir with a single temperature would yield a straight line in
ln(NJ /gJ ) as a function of Eup. Unfortunately, Figure C3 shows that no single temperature characterizes the CO
level populations, consistent with Herschel observations of Herbig Ae/Be and T-Tauri disks by Meeus et al. (2013),
Fedele et al. (2013), van der Wiel et al. (2014) and Fedele et al. (2016). Even when we construct an artificial disk
with the same density and abundance structure as our 2 Myr models, but with a constant temperature enforced at
all points (Figure C3, squares and triangles), the rotation diagram still appears to come from a disk with a range of
temperatures because of the varying optical depth of different transitions. If we derive a temperature from the lowest
two J values, the temperature is quite low -- about 10 K. CO rotation diagrams, even for rare isotopologues, are not
reliable ways to measure protostellar disk temperatures.
C.2. Inferred Mass Depends on the Transition Used
Because the temperature and optical depth are different in various parts of the disk, the mass estimation also
depends on which isotopologue and which emission line is used. We show the mass estimated by different transitions
and isotopologues at 100 yr, 2 Myr, and 3 Myr of the disk evolution in Figure C4. All models assume optically thin
emission for simplicity. The estimated mass decreases as we use higher-J lines with higher excitation energy for the
mass estimation. This is partially contributed by the large optical depth in the inner hot regions of the disk, partially
because we are missing the low temperature CO that does not emit much at higher-J. Our models suggest that it is
best to use lower J transitions to measure disk mass.
22
Figure C3. Rotation diagrams for 13CO for the disks with mass of 0.015 M(cid:12) (left) and 0.03 M(cid:12) (right) at 2 Myr. The circles
are the values of the number of molecules per sublevel in the full model. The squares show values for the same model except
that the gas temperature has been fixed at 20 K and the triangles show a model with T = 55 K.
Figure C4. The mass estimated from various transitions and different isotopologues. Excitation energies are for the upper
excitation state of each transition. The populations at the zero excitation energy are extrapolated from the higher energy
populations with a three degree polynomial function. The actual disk mass is marked by the blue line in the 100 yr diagram
(on the left), and is above the chart in plots for the 2 Myr and 3 Myr disks because the mass is hugely underestimated with the
shown method. The actual disk masses in the input models at those three epochs are 0.0144 M(cid:12), 0.0114 M(cid:12) and 0.0107 M(cid:12).
|
1907.09626 | 1 | 1907 | 2019-07-22T23:22:58 | On the nature of the resonant drag instability of dust streaming in protoplanetary disc | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | The recently discovered resonant drag instability (RDI) of dust streaming in protoplanetary disc is considered as the mode coupling of subsonic gas-dust mixture perturbations. This mode coupling is coalescence of two modes with nearly equal phase velocities: inertial wave (IW) having positive energy and a streaming dust wave (SDW) having negative energy as measured in the frame of gas environment being at rest in vertical hydrostatic equilibrium. SDW is a trivial mode produced by the bulk streaming of dust, which transports perturbations of dust density. In this way, settling combined with radial drift of the dust makes possible coupling of SDW with IW and the onset of the instability. In accordance with the concept of the mode coupling, RDI growth rate is proportional to the square root of the coupling term of the dispersion equation, which itself is proportional to mass fraction of dust, $f\ll 1$. This clarifies why RDI growth rate $\propto f^{1/2}$. When SDW has positive energy, its resonance with IW provides an avoided crossing instead of the mode coupling. In the high wavenumber limit RDI with unbounded growth rate $\propto f^{1/3}$ is explained by the triple mode coupling, which is coupling of SDW with two IW. It coexists with a new quasi-resonant instability accompanied by bonding of two oppositely propagating low-frequency IW. The mode coupling does not exist for dust streaming only radially in a disc. In this case RDI is provided by the obscured mechanism associated with the inertia of solids. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | MNRAS 000, 1 -- ?? (2017)
Preprint July 24, 2019
Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0
On the nature of the resonant drag instability of dust streaming in
protoplanetary disc
V. V. Zhuravlev1⋆
1Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Universitetskij pr., 13, Moscow 119234, Russia
9
1
0
2
l
u
J
2
2
.
]
P
E
h
p
-
o
r
t
s
a
[
1
v
6
2
6
9
0
.
7
0
9
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
ABSTRACT
The recently discovered resonant drag instability (RDI) of dust streaming in protoplane-
tary disc is considered as the mode coupling of subsonic gas-dust mixture perturbations. This
mode coupling is coalescence of two modes with nearly equal phase velocities: inertial wave
(IW) having positive energy and a streaming dust wave (SDW) having negative energy as
measured in the frame of gas environment being at rest in vertical hydrostatic equilibrium.
SDW is a trivial mode produced by the bulk streaming of dust, which transports perturbations
of dust density. In this way, settling combined with radial drift of the dust makes possible
coupling of SDW with IW and the onset of the instability. In accordance with the concept of
the mode coupling, RDI growth rate is proportional to the square root of the coupling term
of the dispersion equation, which itself is proportional to mass fraction of dust, f ≪ 1. This
clarifies why RDI growth rate ∝ f 1/2. When SDW has positive energy, its resonance with
IW provides an avoided crossing instead of the mode coupling. In the high wavenumber limit
RDI with unbounded growth rate ∝ f 1/3 is explained by the triple mode coupling, which is
coupling of SDW with two IW. It coexists with a new quasi-resonant instability accompanied
by bonding of two oppositely propagating low-frequency IW. The mode coupling does not
exist for dust streaming only radially in a disc. In this case RDI is provided by the obscured
mechanism associated with the inertia of solids.
Key words: hydrodynamics -- accretion, accretion discs -- instabilities -- protoplanetary
discs -- planet formation
1 INTRODUCTION
Relative motion of gas and dust in protoplanetary discs drives the
generic dynamical instability of gas-dust mixture due to interaction
between two components via aerodynamic drag. Squire & Hopkins
(2018b) recognised that instability arises each time there is syn-
chronization between the streaming dust motion and the wave
of any nature propagating in gas environment. They termed this
type of instability as resonant drag instability (RDI). This gave
a new look at
the previously known streaming instability of
Youdin & Goodman (2005), which arises due to the radial drift
of solids in the midplane of protoplanetary disc. Currently, the
streaming instability is a candidate for the solids growth medi-
ator between pairwise sticking of particles and gravitational in-
stability of dust-laden sub-disc via classic Safronov-Goldreich-
Ward mechanism, see Safronov (1972) and Goldreich & Ward
(1973), which ends with formation of planetesimals. This view
on the role of the streaming instability was established in the
work by Youdin & Johansen (2007) and Johansen & Youdin (2007)
who investigated its non-linear regime, and subsequently by
⋆ E-mail: [email protected]
c(cid:13) 2017 The Authors
Johansen et al. (2007) who demonstrated that the resulting dust
overdensities are gravitationally unstable. However, the subsequent
simulations have shown that this scenario is sensitive to dust
fraction: it requires the initial metalicity of disc be a few times
higher than the solar metalicity, otherwise turbulence caused by the
streaming instability leads to stirring rather than clumping of dust,
see e.g. Johansen et al. (2009), Bai & Stone (2010). This constraint
becomes more severe due to limitations for grain size.
Along with the known mechanisms of dust pile-up in long-
living turbulent structures of disc such as zonal flows and anticy-
clonic vortices, for the review see e.g. Chiang & Youdin (2010),
Johansen et al. (2014), Birnstiel et al. (2016), the local amount of
dust in a disc can potentially be enhanced through the new vig-
orous instability found by Squire & Hopkins (2018a) (below SH)
who termed it as settling instability, SI hereafter. Along with the
streaming instability, SI is another manifestation of RDI caused
by sedimentation of dust. It was revealed that, as compared with
the streaming instability, SI growth rate is much higher for small
grains with stopping time shorter than the Keplerian time, because
its maximum value does not depend on grain size. Furthermore,
SI operates at larger length-scales. These and other advantages of
SI make it a promising candidate for essential link in the chain of
2
V.V. Zhuravlev
physical processes leading to planetesimal formation, see the dis-
cussion in Section 9.2 of SH.
each other, as soon as the layers of different density are in a relative
motion.
This work is focused on the nature of SI. The Lagrangian
framework is employed to study the dynamics of small perturba-
tions of gas-dust mixture in two-fluid approximation. Such a frame-
work is well developed in application to perturbations in single-
fluid dynamics. In particular, the Lagrangian describing the evo-
lution of perturbations enables to introduce the energy of pertur-
bations from the fundamental symmetry of the system with re-
spect to translations in time. The energy of perturbations is con-
served provided that the background flow is stationary, however,
it is not necessarily a positive definite quantity in a moving fluid.
The existence of negative energy perturbations in the flow is well
established marker of instability. Indeed, any sink of energy in the
system, such as e.g. flux of radiation at infinity or viscous damp-
ing, provides growth of amplitude of negative energy perturba-
tions. Thereby, Friedman & Schutz (1978b) showed that such per-
turbations cause the secular instability of rotating stars with re-
spect to gravitational radiation. The energy functional derived in
terms of the Lagrangian displacement was referred to as the canon-
ical energy, see Friedman & Schutz (1978a). The concept of the
canonical energy has been used in various astrophysical applica-
tions including, for example, stability of relativistic stars, see e.g.
Friedman & Morsink (1998), stability of magnetic stars, see e.g.
Glampedakis & Andersson (2007), dynamic tides in stars, see e.g.
Papaloizou & Ivanov (2010), Ogilvie (2013), and many others.
The physical sense of negative energy perturbations is eas-
ier to grasp noticing that the total mechanical energy of the cor-
responding perturbed flow being itself a positive definite quan-
tity is less than the energy of the background flow. Probably, for
the first time the concept of negative energy in application to
space-charge waves in electron beams was discussed by L.J. Chu
(1951), see the monograph by Briggs (1964) and the book by Pierce
(2006). Kadomtsev et al. (1965) were the first to show the exis-
tence of negative energy electromagnetic waves in plasma, while
the first analysis of such possibility for waves in hydrodynami-
cal flows goes back to works by Landahl (1962) and Benjamin
(1963). A bright exposition on the negative energy waves in con-
text of fluid mechanics and various applications can be found, e.g.,
in the review by Ostrovskii et al. (1986) and the monograph by
Stepanyants & Fabrikant (1989).
One more effect, which provides the growth of amplitude of
negative energy wave is coalescence, also termed as coupling, or
resonant interaction with some other wave having positive energy.
As soon as the former transfers the energy to the latter, the both
waves experience an unbound growth. By the way, an example of
such a coupling of space-charge waves with electromagnetic wave
traveling along a helical coil surrounding an electron beam, which
is described in the book by Pierce (2006) cited above, is quite sim-
ilar to the subject of this work: roughly speaking, it is enough to
replace the electron beam by the streaming of dust, the electromag-
netic wave in helical coil by inertial wave (IW) in gas environment,
the space-charge wave by a streaming dust wave (SDW) and fi-
nally, the spatial growth by the growth over time. A detailed de-
scription of the mode coupling and classification of its variants in
application to the streaming of charged particles through a plasma
can be found in Briggs (1964). As for hydrodynamic applications,
a notable work was done by Cairns (1979) who discovered that the
mode coupling is responsible for a classic Kelvin-Helmholtz insta-
bility. Two waves existing on a jump of fluid density in a uniform
gravitational field acquire energy of different signs and couple with
instability,
Another example, where the mode coupling is responsible
for hydrodynamical
is the well-known Papaloizou-
Pringle instability of uniform angular momentum rotating tori,
see Papaloizou & Pringle (1984), Papaloizou & Pringle (1985),
Papaloizou & Pringle (1987), Kojima (1986), Kojima (1989),
Goldreich et al. (1986) and their citations. An exhaustive explana-
tion of Papaloizou-Pringle instability belongs to Glatzel (1987a)
and Glatzel (1987b). In a simplified two-dimensional model it was
shown that small perturbations grow due to the coupling of surface
gravity modes and sound modes attached to the inner and the outer
boundaries of tori. In the subsequent paper Glatzel (1988) addition-
ally investigated the mode coupling in supersonic plane shear flow.
In this work, the Lagrangian describing the linear dynamics of
modes of two-fluid perturbations is introduced for the general situa-
tion of dust streaming both vertically and radially in protoplanetary
disc. The problem is considered in the terminal velocity approxi-
mation (TVA). It is found that the energy of certain (neutral) mode
of such perturbations akin to SDW can be negative. SDW itself is
a trivial mode, which also can have negative energy and represents
perturbations of dust density transported by the bulk stream of dust
through the unperturbed gas environment in the absence of dust
back reaction on gas. Physically, this is the bulk streaming of dust
that gives rise to a reservoir of negative energy in the form of SDW,
from which IW can draw the unlimited amount of energy. The latter
occurs as soon as the phase velocity of SDW is sufficiently close to
the phase velocity of IW. As the dust back reaction on gas is taken
into account, both modes coalesce with each other giving rise to
the pair of damping and growing coupled modes with strictly equal
phase velocities and the vanished energy, thus, the band of SI ap-
pears. The strength of the mode coupling is determined by the cou-
pling term in the dispersion equation, which is proportional to the
mass fraction of dust in gas-dust mixture. The growth rate of SI
takes maximum value at resonance between IW and SDW, where
IW and SDW acquire equal phase velocities. It is proportional to
the square root of the coupling term and, correspondingly, to the
square root of the dust fraction. At the same time, it does not de-
pend on the size of the particles, see also SH.
The analysis shows that generally, there are various types of
resonances between IW and SDW, also called the mode crossings.
Not all of them result in the mode coupling. If the energy of SDW
is positive, the modes fall into the avoided crossing in the vicinity
of resonance, which provides no SI. That is, the dust back reaction
on gas breaks the dispersion curves describing SDW and IW and
produces two separate branches of neutral modes. At the same time,
there are resonances which exist in the high wavenumber limit. It
turns out that the corresponding mode coupling gives rise to an
unbounded growth rate of SI found by SH. For sufficiently high
dust fraction the unbounded growth rate is proportional to its cube
root, which is explained by the triple coupling of SDW and two
low-frequency IW. In addition, the low-frequency IW bond to each
other due to the dust back reaction on gas and give a quasi-resonant
instability of a new type, which may be as strong as SI when the
dust settling dominates the dust radial drift.
Finally, it is shown that there is no RDI within TVA when
vertical gravity is negligible and dust streams only in the radial
direction. The resonance between SDW and IW existing in this
case provides the avoided crossing rather then the mode cou-
pling. The known streaming instability studied since the work of
Youdin & Goodman (2005) is found beyond TVA. As was shown
by SH, its growth rate is proportional to the square root of the dust
MNRAS 000, 1 -- ?? (2017)
Nature of the dust streaming instability
3
convenient quantity to parametrise aerodynamic drag, see Whipple
(1972). On the scale much shorter than h the low-frequency dynam-
ics of gas is vortical, thus, eq. (4) is accompanied by the condition
of the divergence-free motion
∇ · Ug = 0.
(5)
Note that in the case of ρp = 0 equations (4-5) follow from equa-
tions (A.28a-d) of Umurhan & Regev (2004) for unstratified fluid,
i.e. provided that their ρ′=0.
Similarly, the local dynamics of the pressureless fluid, which
mimics the solids suspended in gas environment, is described by
the following equation
(∂t − qΩ0x∂y)Up − 2Ω0Up,yex + (2 − q)Ω0Up,xey+
V
,
ts
(Up∇)Up = ∇p0
ρg −
(6)
where Up,x and Up,y are, respectively, x- and y-projections of Up.
The continuity equation for dust reads
(7)
(∂t − qΩ0x∂y)ρp + ∇(ρpUp) = 0.
(6-7)
follow from equations
(A.15-A.18) of
Again, eqs.
Umurhan & Regev (2004) provided that their P = 0, ρ → ρp
and aerodynamic friction is added in its right-hand side (RHS). As
it should be according to the Newton's third law, the aerodynamic
drag of dust acting on gas of unit volume equals to the aerodynamic
friction of gas acting on dust of unit volume taken with the opposite
sign.
In the case when dust is tightly coupled to the gas it is conve-
nient to rewrite equations in terms of the center-of-mass velocity,
see Youdin & Goodman (2005)
U ≡
ρgUg + ρpUp
ρ
,
where ρ ≡ ρg + ρp is the total density of gas-dust mixture.
Since
Ug = U −
Up = U +
ρp
ρ
ρg
ρ
V,
V,
one arrives at the new equations
(8)
(9)
(10)
(∂t − qΩ0x∂y)U − 2Ω0Uyex + (2 − q)Ω0Uxey + (U∇)U+
ρ (cid:26)(cid:18)V∇(cid:18) ρp
ρg − ∇(p + p0)
,
(V∇) V(cid:27) = ∇p0
ρ (cid:19)(cid:19) V + 2
ρp
ρ
ρ
ρg
fraction, thus, it is also RDI. However, this sort of RDI arises with
the account of terms describing the inertia of solids, which are of
the next order in the particle stopping time. The physical mecha-
nism responsible for streaming instability of Youdin & Goodman
(2005), though resonant in nature, has nothing to do with the mode
coupling.
The study starts from general equations for local dynamics of
gas-dust mixture in protoplanetary disc and the subsequent review
of TVA. The main part of the paper is focused on the particular
model of the perturbed gas-dust mixture constructed in TVA for
homogeneous background with dust streaming vertically and radi-
ally in a disc. In the last Section the streaming instability of dust
drifting in radial direction is studied beyond TVA.
2 GENERAL EQUATIONS FOR LOCAL DYNAMICS OF
GAS-DUST MIXTURE IN A DISC
In order to consider a small patch inside protoplanetary disc, the
local Cartesian coordinates x, y, z are introduced to represent, re-
spectively, radial r, azimuthal ϕ and vertical z directions. The ra-
dial distance is measured ourwards with respect to the host star,
while the vertical one is collinear with disc rotation axis. The centre
of a reference frame is located at some point r0, ϕ0, z0 > 0 above
the disc midplane rotating with angular velocity Ω0 around the host
star. Accordingly, there are x ≡ r − r0, y ≡ r0(ϕ − ϕ0), z →
(z − z0) and it is assumed below that {x, y, z} ≪ h ≪ r0, where
h is the disc scaleheight. This corresponds to the small shearing
box approximation, see Goldreich & Lynden-Bell (1965) and the
Appendix A of Umurhan & Regev (2004) for detailed derivation
of fluid equations. In this work the same approximation is used to
address the two-fluid dynamics of gas-dust mixture. Both gas and
dust are considered as fluids with velocities, respectively, Ug and
Up measured with respect to some reference velocity U0. The lat-
ter describes the stationary circular shear motion of a single fluid in
the gravitational field of the host star,
obeying the following radial and vertical balance
U0 = −qΩ0x ey,
1
ρg
∂p0
∂x
= −
∂Φ
∂x
+ Ω2
0(r0 + x) + 2Ω0U0,
1
ρg
∂p0
∂z
∂Φ
∂z
,
= −
(1)
(2)
(3)
where Φ is the Newtonian point-mass gravitational potential, p0
and ρg are pressure and density of the fluid, which can be obtained
given the equation of state. In eq. (1) the shear rate q is assumed
to be constant normally close to the Keplerian value q = 3/2
in protoplanetary discs. It can be shown, see the Appendix A of
Umurhan & Regev (2004), that in the small shearing box approxi-
mation the Euler equation for gas reads
(∂t − qΩ0x∂y)Ug − 2Ω0Ug,yex + (2 − q)Ω0Ug,xey+
V
,
ts
(Ug∇)Ug = −∇p
ρp
ρg
ρg
+
(4)
(∂t − qΩ0x∂y)V − 2Ω0Vyex + (2 − q)Ω0Vxey+
V(cid:19)−
ρg
ρ
ρ
(U∇)V + (V∇)U +
ρp
ρ
(V∇)(cid:18) ρp
ρ
V(cid:19) = ∇(p + p0)
(V∇)(cid:18) ρg
−
ρg
ρ
ρg
V
ts
,
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
where Ug,x and Ug,y are, respectively, x- and y-projections of Ug,
ex and ey are, respectively, x- and y-orts, while p introduces addi-
tion to pressure, p0, caused by the influence of dust. The last term
in eq. (4) originates from aerodynamic drag of dust particles mov-
ing through the gas with the relative velocity V ≡ Up − Ug and
mass density ρp. The dust particles stopping time ts = const is a
MNRAS 000, 1 -- ?? (2017)
∇ ·(cid:18)U −
ρp
ρ
V(cid:19) = 0,
(∂t − qΩ0x∂y)ρp + ∇(ρU) = 0.
4
V.V. Zhuravlev
2.1 Ordering of the terms entering the equations
3 RDI WITHIN TVA
Let the characteristic time- and length-scales of gas-dust mixture
dynamics be tev and lev, respectively, while the dust mass fraction
f ≡
ρp
ρg
< 1.
(15)
Hereafter, the condition (15) implies that gas-dust mixture is not
dominated by dust. If the absolute value of the specific pressure
gradient, which governs the dynamics of gas-dust mixture, is
∇(p + p0)
ρ
g ≡ (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)
,
(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)
then the restrictions
τ∗ ≡ ts max{t−1
ev , Ω0} ≪ 1,
λ−1 ≡
gt2
s
lev ≪ 1,
(16)
(17)
greatly simplify equations for gas-dust dynamics. More exactly, the
terms in the left-hand side (LHS) of eq. (12) become small com-
pared to the terms in its RHS, while the terms ∼ O(V 2) become
small compared to the rest terms in LHS of eq. (11). This can be
justified as follows.
If the restrictions (16-17) are valid, the specific pressure gra-
dient entering the RHS of eq. (12) is balanced by the leading term
of this equation, which introduces aerodynamic drag. Dividing eq.
(11) and eq. (12) by g one finds that each of these equations con-
sists of the dimensionless terms of various order in the small τ∗ and
λ−1. So, the terms in the RHS of eq. (11) and eq. (12) as well as
the gradient term ∼ U 2 in the LHS of eq. (11) are of the zero order
in both τ∗ and λ−1. The inertial terms ∼ U in the LHS of eq. (11)
differ from unity by factor τ∗/√λ−1. Next, the inertial terms ∼ V
in the LHS of eq. (12) are of the order of τ∗, whereas the gradient
terms ∼ U V in the LHS of eq. (12) and the gradient terms ∼ V 2 in
the both of these equations are, respectively, of the order of √λ−1
and λ−1. Additionally, the following order-of-magnitude relations
are valid
so that
V ∼ gts, U ∼
gts√λ−1
,
√λ−1.
V /U ∼
In order to study the instability of cooperative settling and
radial drift of the dust in Section 3, all terms of the orders of
τ∗, √λ−1 and λ−1 in eqs. (11) and (12) are omitted, which cor-
responds to what is referred to as TVA, see Youdin & Goodman
(2005). Physically, this means that the inertial forces acting on
solids in the frame comoving with gas are small compared to drag
force and effective gravity force measured in this frame. Note that
the latter equals to the pressure gradient. As eqs. (16) and (17) im-
ply, TVA is the case of sufficiently small solids with stopping time
much shorter than the dynamical time-scale of the problem, as well
as for length-scales of gas-dust mixture dynamics much longer than
the solids stopping length ∼ gt2
s.
Later on, in Section 4 the full set of eqs. (11-14) is reconsid-
ered in order to recover RDI in the case there is only the radial drift
of the dust.
From now on, eqs. (11-12) read
(∂t − qΩ0x∂y)U − 2Ω0Uyex + (2 − q)Ω0Uxey + (U∇)U =
ρg − ∇(p + p0)
∇p0
,
ρ
∇(p + p0)
ρ
=
V
ts
.
(18)
(19)
This Section deals with the analysis of the particular linear solution
of the set of eqs. (18), (19), (13) and (14). In what follows, where
necessary, the usual dimensionless stopping time is used τ ≡ tsΩ0.
3.1 Stationary solution
In the reference frame rotating with Ω0, the local gravitational ac-
celeration has both vertical and radial components. In the geomet-
rically thin disc, the former is defined with the help of eq. (3),
∂zp0
ρg ≡ gz ≈ Ω2
0z0 > 0,
−
(20)
and may be considered as a constant value inside the small box.
Note that in the last equality in eq. (20) the Keplerian value of an-
gular velocity, ΩK , is replaced by Ω0 < ΩK . This is justified by
the small difference between Ω0 and ΩK , which is of the order of
(h/r0)2. This difference is usually parametrised by the dimension-
less
η ≡
ΩK − Ω0
ΩK ≪ 1.
Eq. (2) gives the following relation between the radial (effective)
gravitational acceleration and η:
∂xp0
ρg ≡ gx ≈ 2ηΩ2
0r0 > 0.
−
(21)
Depending on the height of the box above the disc midplane, gx
and gz can be of any ratio with each other.
The most simple solution of eqs. (18), (19), (13) and (14) de-
scribing the dust settling is
U = 0,
∇(p + p0)
ρ
= g,
V = tsg,
(22)
(23)
(24)
where g = −gxex − gzez. Hence, the velocity of dust streaming
through the gas environment is directed along the (effective) gravi-
tational acceleration in the box.
Finally, eq. (13) along with eq. (24) implies that
ρp = const
(25)
on the local scale considered here.
Eqs. (22-25) is the local variant of known Nakagawa et al.
(1986) solution.
MNRAS 000, 1 -- ?? (2017)
3.2 Equations for axisymmetric perturbations
The reduced set of equations describing the dynamics of gas-dust
perturbations with the background (22-25) in the limit of small
f ≪ 1 is derived in the Appendix A. The appropriate state vari-
ables are
≡ −∂zuy,
φ ≡ ∂zux,
uz and δ, where ux, uy, uz are the components of the Eulerian per-
turbation of the centre-of-mass velocity and δ is the relative pertur-
bation of the dust density, see the Appendix A for the details.
The basic equations take the form:
∂tφ = ∂2
txuz − 2Ω0 + f (gz∂xδ − gx∂zδ),
∂t =
κ2
2Ω0
φ,
∂2
tx = −
κ2
2Ω0
∂2
zzuz,
∂2
tzδ = ts(gz∂2
zzδ + gx∂2
xzδ) + 2τ ∂x,
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
where κ2 ≡ 2(2 − q)Ω2
0 is the epicyclic frequency squared.
Let the gas-dust perturbation have the form of the plane wave
χi = χi exp(−iωt + ikx).
(30)
That is, χi are complex Fourier amplitudes of χi. In eq. (30) kx =
kxx + kzz, where kx and kz are wavenumbers, respectively, along
radial and vertical directions in a disc. The frequency ω is in general
a complex value, so that ℑ[ω] > 0 implies the exponential growth
of wave amplitude, i.e. the onset of SI.
Eqs. (26-29) yield
−iω φ − ωkx uz + 2Ω0 − f gzikx δ + f gxikz δ = 0,
(31)
−iω −
κ2
2Ω0
φ = 0,
ωkx −
κ2
2Ω0
k2
z uz = 0,
ωkz δ + tsgzk2
z
δ + tsgxkxkz δ − 2τ ikx = 0.
(32)
(33)
(34)
3.3 Energy of modes of gas-dust perturbations: derivation
from variational principle
For class of neutral modes, when ℑ[ω] = 0 and the amplitudes
are constant, it is possible to formulate the variational principle de-
scribing the dynamics of small perturbations.
Let the modal solution have the form
= cos θ,
φ = φ sin θ,
uz = uz cos θ,
δ = δ sin θ,
(35)
MNRAS 000, 1 -- ?? (2017)
Nature of the dust streaming instability
5
where tilded quantities are real and the phase θ ≡ −ωt + kx. The
tilded quantities in eq. (35) satisfy the set of eqs. (31-34), where the
following replacement is made
→ , φ → −i φ, uz → uz, δ → −iδ.
According to the averaged variational principle for modes, see
Whitham (2011), there is a Lagrangian
L = L( χi, ∂iθ),
where χi ≡ { , φ, uz, δ} and ∂i ≡ {∂t, ∂x, ∂z}, such that the
corresponding Euler-Lagrange equations are equivalent to the set
of eqs. (31-34) for modes of perturbations provided that the action
S = Z Ld2x dt
(36)
with d2x ≡ dxdz be stationary with respect to arbitrary variations
of χi and θ in the small shearing box. The Lagrangian density is
L = L0 + f L1,
(37)
where
L0 = ω φ + ωkx uz − Ω0 2 −
κ2
2Ω0
φ2
2 −
κ2
2Ω0
z u2
k2
z
2
(38)
and
L1 = gz (cid:20)1 −
kz
kx
gx
gz(cid:21)(cid:26)kx δ +
kz δ2
4Ω0 (cid:20) ω
ts
+ (gzkz + gxkx)(cid:21)(cid:27) .
(39)
The subscript '0' denotes the contribution to the full La-
grangian responsible for the dynamics of gas-dust perturbations
with no account for the dust back reaction on gas. In the absence
of dust, L0 describes single-fluid vortical perturbations in rotating
gas. The subscript '1' denotes additional contribution to L respon-
sible solely for the dynamics of dust in terms of the evolution of its
density. The first term in curly braces in L1 is the cross-term, which
describes both the action of gas on solids and the back reaction of
solids on gas via the aerodynamic drag.
It can be checked that eqs. (31-34) correspond to the following
Euler-Lagrange equations
∂L
∂ χi
= 0.
(40)
Also, it is straightforward to check that equations (40) yield an al-
ternative form of the dispersion equation (cf. eq. (49) below), which
is nothing but
The remaining Euler-Lagrange equation is
L = 0.
−∂t(cid:18) ∂L
∂ω(cid:19) + ∂x(cid:18) ∂L
∂kx(cid:19) + ∂z (cid:18) ∂L
∂kz(cid:19) = 0.
(41)
(42)
Note that L is known up to an arbitrary (dimensional) constant
factor since it describes the linear problem. The sign of L is chosen
so that the energy of IW propagating in rigidly rotating fluid (i.e. in
the case f = q = 0) be positive, see eq. (46) along with eq. (53)
below.
A conserved quantity associated with the invariance of L with
respect to translations in time is the energy of neutral mode E ≡
R Ed2x, where
E =
∂L
∂(∂tθ)
∂tθ = ω
∂L
∂ω
(43)
6
V.V. Zhuravlev
is the energy density of mode. Eq. (42) shows that E changes due
to the surface flux of
F ≡ −ω
∂L
∂k
.
(44)
Hence, this quantity is associated with the energy flux of mode, see
Whitham (2011).
The energy density of mode incorporates the basic contribu-
tion, which is similar to the energy density of gas perturbations in
rotating flow in the absence of dust, and the additional contribution
related to perturbations of dust density
Explicitly,
E = E0 + f E1.
E0 = 2Ω0
k2ω2
κ2k2
z
2,
where k2 = k2
x + k2
z , and
E1 =
ω
4τ
kz
kx
(kxgz − kzgx) δ2.
(45)
(46)
(47)
For what follows, see Sections 3.7, 3.9 and 3.10, it is conve-
+ f τ ω
k2ω2
κ2k2
z
kxgz − kzgx
(ω + tsgzkz + tsgxkx)2
nient to represent E in the form:
E = (cid:26)2Ω0
kz(cid:27) 2.
In the limit f → 0 E → E0, which is positive definite1. How-
ever, E1 has any sign depending on the signs of wavenumbers and
frequency of mode, as well as on the sign of combination in the
brackets of eq. (47). As the dust fraction becomes non-negligible,
the balance of terms in eq. (45) for the corresponding mode fre-
quency ω(kx, kz) determines whether E is either positive or nega-
tive quantity.
kx
(48)
In the particular case of the dust settling, i.e. when gx → 0, it
is possible to do a straightforward generalisation of the above vari-
ational principle onto perturbations of general form, see Appendix
B. It can be shown that in the general case of dust streaming ver-
tically and radially in a disc the variational principle of the form
(B1) should contain the higher derivatives of χi. The development
of such a formalism is beyond the scope of this study. Note that in
the case gx → 0 eq. (48) becomes identical to eq. (B8) provided
that ℑ[ω] = 0.
3.4 Dispersion equation
As it follows from eqs. (31-34), ω obeys an equation
Dg(ω, k) · Dp(ω, k) = ǫ(k),
where
Dg(ω, k) ≡ ω2 − ω2
i ,
Dp(ω, k) ≡ ω − ωp,
ǫ(k) ≡ f tsκ2 kx
(kxgz − kzgx)
with ωi ≡ −(kz/k)κ and ωp ≡ −tsgxkx − tsgzkz.
kz
k
k
1 This is true in centrifugally stable flows only
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
tions
and
For f → 0, eq. (49) splits into two separate dispersion equa-
Dg(ω1, k) = 0
Dp(ω2, k) = 0
(53)
(54)
describing, respectively, two IW2 propagating in opposite direc-
tions and one else mode, which is referred to as SDW. Indeed, eq.
(53) can be obtained from eqs. (31-34) setting δ = 0. Since the
dust fraction is negligible, the remaining variables describe pertur-
bations of gas only. The set of equations (31-34) in this particular
limit is identical to those that describe IW in rigidly rotating fluid,
see e.g. Landau & Lifshitz (1987), paragraph 14. In astrophysical
context, one should take into account the more general case of
shearing rotating flow and replace 2Ω, which is the epicyclic fre-
quency for rigid rotation, by κ, see e.g. Balbus (2003), paragraph
3.2.3. For this reason, the modes described by eq. (53) are referred
to as the IW below3. On the contrary, eq. (54) follows from eqs.
(31-34) provided that = φ = uz = 0, which means that gas
environment remains unperturbed, whereas arbitrary initial pertur-
bations of dust are transported by the bulk streaming of dust with
the velocity (24). The phase velocity of SDW is equal to the scalar
product of the dust velocity and the normal to the wavefront.
Accordingly, as long as the dust fraction is negligible, E0 in-
troduces the energy of IW, see eq. (46), whereas f E1 introduces
the energy of SDW, see eq. (47).
3.5 The mode coupling
The form of the dispersion equation described in the previous Sec-
tion has been examined in the dynamics of waves in shear flows,
see Fabrikant et al. (1998). Cairns (1979) suggested that the solu-
tion of eq. (49) with small RHS can be interpreted as the coupling
of modes having their own dispersion relations Dg and Dp. The
RHS of eq. (49) is referred to as coupling term.
The coupling term originates from the product of the last two
terms in eq. (31) and the last term in eq. (34). In turn, the former
comes from the last terms in RHS of eqs. (A8) and (A10), which are
proportional to gravitational acceleration in a disc. Physically, this
term is the deviation of the weight of solids acting on gas, which
emerges due to perturbation of the dust density. At the same time,
the last term in eq. (34) comes from the first term in RHS of eq.
(A11), which exists as soon as the flow is rotational, see eq. (A17).
Indeed, if it were not for the rotation, the pressure maxima would be
absent in the perturbed gas environment. In the linear problem, the
subsonic pressure maxima, which are necessary both for existence
of IW and for dust clumping, arise due to the action of Coriolis
force. The similar situation was noted by Jacquet et al. (2011) in
context of the streaming instability of Youdin & Goodman (2005),
see their discussion about the geostrophic balance. However, as it
becomes clear from the study of SH, see also Section 4 of this pa-
per, Jacquet et al. (2011) considered the non-resonant instability of
gas-dust mixture different from RDI.
The coupling causes the deviation of the mode frequencies by
a small value ∆ ≡ ω−ωc at the mode crossing. The mode crossing
2 Referred to as 'epicyclic mode' in SH
3 Note that according to eq. (A2) such IW produce a non-zero perturbation
of relative velocity.
MNRAS 000, 1 -- ?? (2017)
is the point in the phase space, where the phase velocities of modes
are equal to each other, thus, eqs. (53-54) are jointly satisfied and
Then,
ω1 = ω2 ≡ ωc.
Dg(ω) ≈ ∂ωDgωc ∆,
Dp(ω) ≈ ∂ωDpωc ∆.
Substitution of these approximations into eq. (49) yields the fol-
lowing solution
∆ = ±(cid:18)
ǫ
∂ωDgωc · ∂ωDpωc (cid:19)1/2
= ±(cid:18) ǫ
2ωc(cid:19)1/2
.
(55)
This general result is employed in Sections 3.7-3.9 to show a sim-
ple way to reproduce the analytical estimations of SI growth rate
obtained by SH.
A more subtle thing is that the sign of the expression under
the square root in eq. (55) follows the sign of SDW energy taken
at the mode crossing, see eq. (47). Therefore, as there is a mode
crossing between SDW and IW, then SI occurs if and only if SDW
has negative energy. Since the energy of IW is always positive, see
eq. (46), this implies that the instability occurs as soon as the cou-
pling waves have the energy of different signs. Following Cairns
(1979), this allows for clear interpretation of SI as the resonant
coalescence of waves in the gas-dust mixture, which provides an
exchange with energy between the waves. The total energy of cou-
pled mode formed by the coalesced waves remains constant, while
the non-zero energy flux between the coalesced waves provides the
growth of their amplitudes as soon as the energy flows from the
negative energy wave to the positive energy wave. On the contrary,
if the energy flows in the opposite direction, a coupled mode is
damping. These cases represent the pair of complex conjugate so-
lutions of the dispersion equation (49) approximately given by eq.
(55).
The following Sections provide the details of the mode cou-
pling during the dust settling or/and the dust radial drift. The fre-
quencies and the energy of modes of gas-dust perturbations for fi-
nite non-zero f > 0 are obtained from the accurate solution of eq.
(49). Hereafter it is assumed that kz > 0. Eq. (49) indicates that
the case kz < 0 is reduced to the previous one by the replacement
kx → −kx and ω → −ω.
3.6 Units
Wherever it is needed below, the frequencies are measured in units
of Ω0 and the wavenumbers are measured in units of the inversed
artificial length-scale, L . h. Accordingly, the gravitational accel-
eration is measured in units of LΩ2
0. In all particular calculations
q = 3/2 and τ = 0.1.
3.7 Particular case of the dust vertical settling
Here it is assumed that the box is located sufficiently far above the
disc midplane so that gz solely controls the streaming of dust, cf.
eqs. (20) and (21). The corresponding restriction reads
z0
r0 ≫ 2η.
(56)
An accurate solution of eq. (49) for particular values of param-
eters is presented in Fig. 1. The problem is symmetric with respect
to kx → −kx, so the case kx > 0 is considered only. Note that
MNRAS 000, 1 -- ?? (2017)
Nature of the dust streaming instability
7
only two branches of ω with ℜ[ω] < 0 are shown, while there ex-
ists a third one with ℜ[ω] > 0. The corresponding profile of the
energy density of mode, E, normalised by 2 is shown on the
bottom panel of Fig. 1.
As far as the dust fraction is negligible, f = 0, there is no
instability of gas-dust mixture. As expected, for f > 0 SI sets on
in the vicinity of the point, where the frequencies of two branches
evaluated for f = 0 are equal to each other. This is the mode cross-
ing point. For the particular values of parameters taken in Fig. 1
it is located at kx = 6. The non-negligible dust fraction causes a
small deviation of the branches corresponding to IW and SDW in
such a way that in some band around the mode crossing the waves
acquire identical phase velocities and increment/decrement, which
takes maximum value approximately at the mode crossing, com-
pare the curves marked by (1) with the curves marked by (2) and (3)
in Fig. 1. Strictly speaking, the waves represented by curves (2) and
(3) are the specific kind of waves propagating through the gas-dust
mixture with dust settling to the disc midplane. Outside the band
of instability these waves are akin to IW and SDW having, respec-
tively, positive and negative energy densities. As one approaches
the band of instability, the absolute value of the energy density of
the both branches vanishes. At the same time, the neutral waves
coalesce and give birth to a pair of growing and damping waves
as seen in Fig. 1. The energy of such waves vanishes, since this is
the only way for the energy to be conserved for alternating ampli-
tudes of waves, see the Appendix B2.1 and also Friedman & Schutz
(1978a). Similar picture occurs in some applications from physics
of hydrodynamical instability of shear flows, where it is regarded
as a mode coupling discussed above in Section 3.5.
According to eqs. (53-54) with gx = 0 the mode crossing
occurs as soon as the condition
tsgz =
κ
k
(57)
is true. Once (57) is satisfied, the phase velocities of IW and SDW
are equal to each other ωc = ωi = ωp.
As one follows derivation of eq. (57) starting from the gen-
eral equations (A1-A4), it becomes clear that the LHS of eq.
(57) is nothing but the bulk settling velocity of dust given by
eq. (24), also cf. eq. (4.4) of Squire & Hopkins (2018a). There-
fore, the latter defines the characteristic wavelength of the mode
coupling and the band of SI. As has been already recognised by
Squire & Hopkins (2018a), the growing gas-dust perturbations of
SI have larger length-scales than that of the streaming instability of
Youdin & Goodman (2005). Clearly, this is because in the geomet-
rically thin disc settling velocity can be higher than the velocity of
radial drift by factor ∼ (h/r0)−1.
Equation (55) applied to the case gx → 0 yields
∆ = ±i κ(cid:18) f
2(cid:19)1/2 kx
k
,
(58)
where eq. (57) is taken into account. The estimate (58) is in accor-
dance with eq. (5.13) of SH. For small value of f used in Fig. 1
this analytical increment/decrement virtually coincides with an ac-
curate solution of eq. (49). It is also equivalent to eq. (B10) in the
leading order in f 1/2.
Additionally, it should be noted that as far as the main restric-
tion of solids tightly coupled to gas is valid, see eq. (16), the con-
dition (57) fits well within the second restriction of the model, see
eq. (17). Indeed, in the case of the Keplerian shear eq. (57) implies
that
lev ∼ gztsΩ−1
0 ,
3
2
1
1
2
Table 1. Formal types of the mode crossing for any gz > 0
type
(kx, Re[ω]) sector
group velocities
concavity
I
II
III
III′
IV
kx > 0, ωc < 0
kx < 0, ωc < 0
kx < 0, ωc < 0
kx < 0, ωc < 0
kx < 0, ωc > 0
∂kx ωp 6 0 < ∂kx ωi
∂kx ωi < ∂kx ωp 6 0
∂kx ωp 6 ∂kx ωi < 0
∂kx ωp 6 ∂kx ωi < 0
∂kx ωp < 0 < ∂kx (−ωi)
any value
any value
∂2
ωi < 0
kx
∂2
ωi > 0
kx
any value
3
Table 2. Existence of the mode crossings of different types for any gz > 0.
type
existence
3
4
5
6
kx
7
8
9
10
2
3
I
II
III
III′
IV
′
′
∀gx: kz 6 kz
0 6 gx < g
0 < gx 6 g
0 < gx 6 g
x < gx: kz < kz
g
∀kz: gx > 0
′′
′
′′
z
′
′
x: k
z < kz < k
x: k
z < kz , g
x: kz < kz 6 k
′
x < gx < g
′
′′
x : k
z < kz
′′
′
z , g
x < gx 6 g
′′
x : kz < kz 6 k
′
z ,
8
V.V. Zhuravlev
1
0,9
-Re ω
0,8
0,7
0,6
2
0,1
0,05
Im ω
0
-0,05
1
7
8
9
10
6
k x
3
2
-0,1
2
3
4
5
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
^
E
3
2
-5
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
6
k x
Figure 1. Top panel: the curves show ℜ[ω] taken with the opposite sign,
where ω is the solution of the dispersion equation (49). The parameters
are q = 3/2, gx = 0, gz = 1, τ = 0.1, kz = 8. It is assumed that
f = 0 (branches marked as '1'), f = 0.001 (branches marked as '2') and
f = 0.01 (branches marked as '3'). In the case f = 0 the solid and the
dashed line correspond to SDW and IW (see text), respectively. In the case
f > 0 the solid and the dashed lines correspond to modes akin to SDW
and IW, respectively. Middle panel: the imaginary part of the corresponding
solution. The filled circles represent the analytical solution given by eq. (58)
at the mode crossing given by eq. (57). Bottom panel: the energy density of
modes with ℑ[ω] = 0 as given by eq. (48) and additionally the energy
density of growing/damping modes as given by eq. (B8), for 2 = 1 and
the non-zero f . The solid and the dashed lines correspond to modes akin to
SDW and IW, respectively.
which corresponds to the length-scale larger than the stopping
length of solids settling to the disc midplane4 ∼ gzt2
s by factor
∼ τ −1 ≫ 1. The main restriction (16) is valid as far as ℜ[ω] ∼ Ω0
and ℑ[ω] . Ω0.
3.8 Introducing the dust radial drift
As the box gets down to the disc midplane, the bulk streaming of
dust is determined by combination of vertical and radial compo-
nents of gravitational acceleration. The symmetry of the problem
with respect to kx → −kx breaks and the general picture of the
mode crossing (just 'crossing' below in this Section) between IW
and SDW becomes more complex. It is shown in Fig. (2) on the
plane of (kx,−ℜ[ω]). For the specific value of kz there are two cer-
tain branches of the oppositely propagating IW given by eq. (53),
whereas the position of the straight line representing SDW, see eq.
(54), is determined by the changeable gx and gz. This line is ho-
risontal for gx = 0, while it crosses the origin of coordinates, i.e.
(kx = 0,−ℜ[ω] = 0), for gz = 0, see the lines (1) and (4) in
Fig. 2, respectively. In the former limiting case, there can be up to
two crossings, whereas in the latter limiting case there are always
two crossings, each one with its own branch of IW. In the general
situation of gx > 0 and gz > 0, there can be from two and up to
the four crossings, see the lines (2) and (3) in Fig. 2. Note that the
lines of SDW shown in Fig. 2 intersect each other at the crossing
considered for example in Fig. 1.
The condition of the crossing becomes
ts(kxgx + kzgz) = ±κ
kz
k
,
(59)
where '+' and '-' are taken for ωc < 0 and ωc > 0, respectively.
In order to facilitate the understanding, it is appropriate to in-
troduce the formal classification of the crossings, see table 1 and
Fig. 2. The conditions for existence of the crossings of different
types is collected in the table 2.
There are a few quantities that delimit the whole space of pa-
rameters with respect to the existence of crossings of various type.
First, the value of gx = g
x, which restricts the existence of type-II
′
4 cf. similar restriction obtained by Jacquet et al. (2011) who considered
the streaming instability.
MNRAS 000, 1 -- ?? (2017)
-Reω
1
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0
-0,2
-0,4
-0,6
-0,8
-1
1
I
4
III
2
IV
II
3
-140
-120
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
kx
Figure 2. The general view of the mode crossing with the account of the
dust radial drift for τ = 0.1, q = 3/2 and kz = 8. Solid curves marked
as '1', '2', '3' and '4' represent SDW for f = 0 and the value of gravi-
tational acceleration (gx; gz) being, respectively, (0.0; 1.0), (0.1; 0.925),
(0.3; 0.775) and (4/3; 0), respectively. Dashed curves represent two IW
propagating in the opposite directions. Additionally, the solution of the dis-
persion equation (49) is shown for the case of (gx = 0.1; gz = 0.925) and
f = 0.001, see the solid curves marked by 'I' 'II' 'III' and 'IV' represent-
ing the modes akin to SDW, whereas the dotted curves represent the modes
akin to IW in this case. At the same time, these Roman numbers denote the
type of the mode crossing which causes the corresponding mode coupling
(or avoided crossing, see Sections 3.9 and 3.10 for details), see table 1.
crossings, is defined by the condition that the lines of SDW and IW
do not touch each other for gx > g
x. It reads
′
g
′
x ≡
gz√8
.
(60)
′
′′
′
As soon as gx < g
x, there are two values of kz, k
z,
corresponding to the positions of SDW line tangent to IW curve. It
is straightforward to obtain them for given gz and gx < g
x, though
the corresponding expressions are omitted here to save space. Note
that in the limit gx → g
z > k
x
′
′
′
k
z → k
′′
z → ¯kz ≡
where
4
3r 2
3
kz ≡
κ
tsgz
.
kz ≈ kz,
(61)
(62)
For kz = kz the crossing occurs at kx = 0, where the 'negative'
x → 0
branch of IW attains its minimum. Oppositely, as gx → 0 k
and k
′′
′
x → kz.
Next, for a higher g
′
x < gx < g
x , where
′′
√2gz,
(63)
′′
g
x ≡
type-III and type-III' crossings co-exist in the range kz > kz with
the transition into each other at
′
k
z ≡
2kz
√3(√2 − gx/gz)
.
(64)
′
′′
x , k
As gx → g
Also, note that in the limiting case gx = g
z → ∞ and type-III crossing disappears for all kz.
′
x
k
′
z = ¯kz.
A caveat should be done, that in this study of SI the distinction
MNRAS 000, 1 -- ?? (2017)
Nature of the dust streaming instability
9
between type-III and type-III' crossings looks completely formal.
Still, it is shown here for the sake of rigorous analysis.
The formal picture presented above leads to the following
summary:
• In the case of small radial drift, 0 < gx ≪ gz, type-I (or
type-III') and type-II crossings are confined in the range kz . kz,
while type-III crossing exists for unlimited kz. For type-III crossing
kx ≫ kz.
• As radial drift and vertical settling are comparable to each
other, gx ∼ gz, type-II crossing disappears, while the whole range
of kz is shared between type-I and type-III(') crossings for kz 6 kz
and kz > kz, respectively.
• In the case of dominating radial drift, gx ≫ gz, the whole
range of kz is shared between type-I and type-III′ crossings, while
the zone of type-III′ crossing shifts to high kz as kz increases with
decreasing gz. For type-III′ crossing kx ≪ kz.
• Type-IV crossing exists in all mentioned cases.
Prediction of SI for the crossing of any type can be done using
the rule revealed in Section 3.5. Examination of the energy density
of SDW, see eq. (47), leads to the conclusion that type-I crossing
produces SI for kx/kz > gx/gz only. In the opposite case, the
mode coupling is absent. Clearly, the greater the radial drift, the
more severe becomes this restriction on SI, see Section 3.9 for de-
tails. On the contrary, type-II and type-III(') crossings produce SI
with no regards to the parameters, whereas, by the same reasoning,
at the type-IV crossing the mode coupling is always absent, see
Section 3.10.
According to the general formula (55),
the approximate
growth/damping rate at the crossing of any type producing SI is
∆ = ±iκ(cid:18) f
2(cid:19)1/2 (kxkz)1/2
k
gxkx + gzkz(cid:19)1/2
(cid:18) kxgz − kzgx
,
(65)
which must be evaluated under the condition (59). In the case of
the crossing, which does not produce SI, eq. (65) provides an esti-
mation for real correction to ωc. Eq. (65) is in accordance with eq.
(5.12) of SH.
3.9 Avoided crossing of modes
In this Section type-I crossing is considered more closely. It can be
seen that for gx > 0 the coupling term given by eq. (52) changes
its sign at some kx > 0. For smaller kx, the mode coupling ceases
even for non-zero dust fraction and is replaced by the avoided
crossing, see e.g. Stepanyants & Fabrikant (1989).
The condition ǫ = 0 along with the mode crossing condition
(59) yields that for the given gx and gz the mode coupling ceases
at
k(AC)
x
=
gxg2
z
g3
kz,
k(AC)
z
=
g3
z
g3
kz.
(66)
(67)
z
Accordingly, for kz < k(AC)
the type-I crossing causes the mode
coupling, while for kz > k(AC)
it causes the avoided crossing. As
z
gx becomes greater, k(AC)
steeply gets smaller than the character-
istic kz = kz. Examination of eq. (65) for this case in the limit
gx ≫ gz, which corresponds to kx ≫ kz for type-I crossing, leads
z
10
V.V. Zhuravlev
to conclusion that the growth rate of SI decreases like
ℑ[ω] ∼ O(cid:18) gz
gx(cid:19)ℑ[ω]stl,
(68)
eq. (58).
where ℑ[ω]stl = κ (f /2)1/2 is the maximum growth rate given by
In the absence of the dust settling, i.e. for gz = 0, there is
no coupling for type-I crossing, and one arrives at the following
estimation for the real corrections to the frequencies of SDW and
IW:
∆ = ±κ(cid:18) f
2(cid:19)1/2 kz
k
,
(69)
which is in accordance with eq. (5.10) of SH to the leading order in
τ .
The transition of type-I crossing from the mode coupling to
the avoided crossing as the radial drift of the dust becomes com-
parable to its settling is shown in Fig. 3. For several particular
solutions of eq. (49) the components of gravitational acceleration
are chosen in such a way that the mode crossing occurs at the
same point as in Fig. 1. It is seen that as gx increases, the band
of SI shrinks and the maximum growth rate becomes smaller. Next,
for gx/gz ≈ 3/4, which is determined by eqs. (66-67) for this
mode crossing, the mode coupling ceases and the two separate
curves of ℜ[ω] emerge instead. Each of these curves consists of
the parts, which can be associated with the modes akin to IW and
SDW as demonstrated in Fig. 3. In other words, the branches rep-
resenting the modes akin to IW and SDW become broken as the
avoided crossing occurs. The corresponding analytical estimations
done with the account of both the radial drift and the vertical set-
tling are in a good agreement with an accurate result. Turning to
the profiles of the energy of modes, one finds that as far as SI ex-
ists, they are similar those shown in Fig. 1. However, in the vicinity
of the critical point defined by eqs. (66-67) there is another situa-
tion. Indeed, in the case marked as '3' in Fig. 3 the mode coupling
still occurs, though it is rather weak. Nevertheless, one of the cor-
responding branches of mode akin to SDW acquires the positive
energy. Further, as the avoided crossing arises, one finds that the
two separate curves of ℜ[ω] marked as '4' represent the positive
energy modes.
3.10 Behaviour of mode crossings at negative radial
wavenumber
′
All crossings except the type-I crossing take place at kx < 0. Eq.
(65), or equivalently, the energy density of SDW (47) along with
the rule noted in Section 3.5, indicate that type-II and type-III(′)
crossings result in the mode coupling for any f > 0, while type-IV
crossing always provides the real correction to the frequency, thus,
resulting in the avoided crossing. As follows from table 2, type-
II and type-III crossings occur for the substantial settling only, as
they exist for gx < g
x , respectively. At the same time,
type-III′ and type-IV crossings remain in the limit gz → 0. Addi-
tionally, unlike the type-II crossing, type-III,III′ and -IV crossings
are not confined over kz and kx.
In this Section the solution of eq. (49) is shown for the case
when settling dominates the radial drift of the dust, see Fig. 4 for
type-II crossing and Fig. 5 for type-III and type-IV crossings. The
components of gravitational acceleration are chosen in such a way
that the corresponding type-I crossing occurs at the same point as
in Fig. 1. The mode coupling at the type-II crossing is similar to
x and gx < g
′′
1
0,9
-Re ω
0,8
0,7
0,6
2
0,1
0,05
Im ω
0
-0,05
1
2
3
3
3
4
2
1
4
3
3
4
5
6
kx
7
8
9
10
2
1
3
-0,1
2
3
4
5
4
6
kx
7
8
9
10
^
E
20
15
10
5
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
2
4
3
4
1
2
3
2
1
3
4
5
6
kx
7
8
9
10
Figure 3. Modification of the mode coupling demonstrated in Fig. 1 due to
the dust radial drift. Top panel: the curves show ℜ[ω] taken with the op-
posite sign, where ω is the solution of the dispersion equation (49). The
parameters are q = 3/2, τ = 0.1, kz = 8 and f = 0.01. Gravitational
acceleration (gx; gz) is the following: (0.0; 1.0) (branches marked as '1'),
(0.3; 0.775) (branches marked as '2'), (0.48; 0.64) (branches marked as
'3') and (0.8; 0.4) (branches marked as '4'). The solid and the dashed lines
correspond to modes akin to SDW and IW, respectively. The filled circles
represent the analytical solution given by eq. (65) taken at the mode cross-
ing according to eq. (59) for (gx = 0.8; gz = 0.4). Middle panel: the
imaginary part of the corresponding solution. The filled circles represent
the analytical solution given by eq. (65) taken at the mode crossing given
by eq. (59) for (gx = 0.0; gz = 1.0) and (gx = 0.3; gz = 0.775). Bot-
tom panel: the energy density of modes as given by eq. (48) for 2 = 1
for modes with ℑ[ω] = 0. The solid and the dashed lines correspond to
modes akin to SDW and IW, respectively.
MNRAS 000, 1 -- ?? (2017)
3
2
1
-10
kx
-9
-8
3
2
1
-10
kx
2
-8
3
0,7
-Re ω
1
2
0,6
3
-12
-11
0,04
0,02
Im ω
0
-0,02
-0,04
-12
5
0
-5
-10
-15
^
E
3
Nature of the dust streaming instability
11
the case of dust settling, see Fig. 1, with the difference that band
of instability is slightly wider at the type-II crossing for the same
value of the dust fraction. In contrast, type-III crossing provides the
band of instability in much greater range of kx with the growth rate
by more than two times higher for the same value of the dust frac-
tion. The bottom panel in Fig. 5 shows that in the vicinity of the
mode coupling the energy of modes akin to IW and SDW still have
the opposite signs, however, as soon as ℜ[ω] of the mode akin to
SDW becomes positive, its energy also acquires the positive values.
Thus, the type-IV crossing of SDW which occurs with the other
IW, provides the avoided crossing with no SI. As a result, the loop
of the energy profile forms to the left from the mode coupling in
Fig. 5. The analytical estimates made at type-III and type-IV cross-
ings show less accordance with an accurate solution which may be
caused by the proximity of the crossings to each other. It can be
checked that for greater value of the dust fraction, or alternatively,
for higher kz than shown in Fig. 5 the mode coupling expands be-
yond the type-IV crossing, while at the same moment the ordinary
coupling of two modes is replaced by the novel variant of coupling
between three modes, i.e. two IW and one SDW, see Section 3.11.
In the opposite situation when the radial drift of the dust domi-
nates its settling, i.e. gz ≪ gx, type-III′ crossing provides the mode
coupling in the high-kz limit, see Fig. 6. This case can be consid-
ered analytically employing the limits gx ≫ gz and kz ≫ kz.
Then the growth rate given by eq. (65) is reduced to the following
result
∆ ≈ ±i(cid:18) f
2(cid:19)1/2
(κtsgzkz)1/2.
(70)
Eq. (70) confirms that in this case the growth rate does not depend
on the rate of radial drift, see Fig. 6. Instead, the band of the in-
stability shrinks over the radial wavenumber. Eq. (70) can be com-
pared with the growth rate in case of the dust settling, see eq. (58),
ℑ[ω] ∼ (cid:18) kz
kz(cid:19)1/2
ℑ[ω]stl,
which is formally even higher than the maximum value found in
the absence of radial drift. However, as gz → 0, kz → ∞ and this
branch of SI should be suppressed by viscosity in real disc.
-20
-12
-11
-10
kx
-9
-8
Figure 4. The mode coupling produced by the type-II mode crossing. Top
panel: the curves show ℜ[ω] taken with the opposite sign, where ω is the
solution of the dispersion equation (49). The parameters are q = 3/2, τ =
0.1, gx = 0.1, gz = 0.925 and kz = 8. The dust fraction is taken as
f = 0 (branches marked as '1'), f = 0.0005 (branches marked as '2')
and f = 0.001 (branches marked as '3'). In the case f = 0 the solid
and the dashed line correspond to SDW and IW, respectively. In the case
f > 0 the solid and the dashed lines correspond to modes akin to SDW
and IW, respectively. Middle panel: the imaginary part of the corresponding
solution. The filled circles represent the analytical solution given by eq.
(65) at the mode crossing according to eq. (59). Bottom panel: the averaged
energy density of modes with ℑ[ω] = 0 as given by eq. (48) for 2 = 1
and the non-zero f . The solid and the dashed lines correspond to modes
akin to SDW and IW, respectively.
MNRAS 000, 1 -- ?? (2017)
3.11 Triple coupling of modes
Here the mode coupling provided by the type-III crossing is con-
sidered in the high-wavenumber limit kz > kz in the case when
settling dominates radial drift, see Fig. 7. As the dust fraction in-
creases, the growth rate of SI behaves in a different way than it is
expected from the ordinary mode coupling. In the high-k limit the
resonance condition (59) gives that kx → −(gz/gx)kz and eq. (65)
yields
∆ = ±i(cid:18) f
2(cid:19)1/2
(κtsgzk)1/2.
(71)
As it is seen on the bottom panel in Fig. 7, eq. (71) along with
the more general eq. (65) provides satisfactory approximation of
an accurate solution of eq. (49) for smaller f = 0.001 only. As the
dust fraction becomes higher, those equations overestimate actual
growth rate evaluated at the type-III crossing. The reason for such
discrepancy can be found out deriving the approximate solution to
eq. (49) in a slightly different way than it is done in Section 3.5.
Indeed, eq. (49) can be written in another form:
(ω − ωi)(ω + ωi)(ω − ωp) = ǫ.
(72)
1
1
3
-70
kx
3
2
-60
-50
-40
3
12
V.V. Zhuravlev
3
2
0,2
0,1
-Re ω
0
-0,1
-0,2
2
-100
-90
-80
0,06
0,04
0,02
Im ω
0
-0,02
-0,04
1
2
1,2
1,1
-Re ω
1
0,9
0,8
0,7
-10
0,06
0,04
0,02
Im ω
0
-0,02
-0,04
2
3
1
3
1
2
-8
-6
1
-4
kx
2
-2
0
2
3
-70
kx
3
-0,06
-100
-90
-80
^
E
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
2
2
3
-60
-50
-40
-0,06
-10
-8
-6
-4
kx
-2
0
2
Figure 6. SI in the case of the dust radial drift dominating the dust settling.
Top panel: the curves show ℜ[ω] taken with the opposite sign, where ω is
the solution of the dispersion equation (49). The parameters are q = 3/2,
τ = 0.1, gz = 0.1, f = 0.01 and kz = 120. The radial gravitational
acceleration is taken as gx = 0.5 (branches marked as '1'), gx = 1.0
(branches marked as '2') and gx = 2.0 (branches marked as '3'). The solid
and the dashed lines correspond to modes akin to SDW and IW, respec-
tively. Bottom panel: the imaginary part of the corresponding solution. The
filled circles represent the analytical solution given by eq. (65) at the mode
crossing according to eq. (59).
2
3
-100
-90
-80
-70
kx
-60
-50
-40
Again, let the deviation from the type-III crossing caused by the
coupling term be ∆ = ω−ωi = ω−ωp, where ωc = ωi = ωp < 0.
As far as
Figure 5. The mode coupling and the avoided crossing produced by the
type-III and type-IV mode crossings, respectively. Top panel: the curves
show ℜ[ω] taken with the opposite sign, where ω is the solution of the dis-
persion equation (49). The parameters are q = 3/2, τ = 0.1, gx = 0.1,
gz = 0.925 and kz = 8. The dust fraction is taken as f = 0 (branches
marked as '1'), f = 0.0005 (branches marked as '2') and f = 0.001
(branches marked as '3'). In the case f = 0 the solid lines correspond to
SDW, while the dashed and the dot-dashed lines correspond to IW propagat-
ing in the opposite directions. In the case f > 0 the similar lines correspond
to modes akin to SDW and IW. The filled and the hollow circles represent
the analytical solution given by eq. (65) at the type-IV mode crossing ac-
cording to eq. (59), respectively, for f = 0.0005 and f = 0.001. Mid-
dle panel: the imaginary part of the corresponding solution. The filled and
the hollow circles represent the analytical solution given by eq. (65) at the
type-III mode crossing according to eq. (59), respectively, for f = 0.0005
and f = 0.001. Bottom panel: the averaged energy density of modes with
ℑ[ω] = 0 as given by eq. (48) for 2 = 1 and the non-zero f . The
solid lines correspond to modes akin to SDW, while the dashed and the
dot-dashed lines correspond to IW propagating in the opposite directions.
∆ ≪ 2ωi,
∆ is determined by equation
∆ ≈ ±(cid:18) ǫ
2ωi(cid:19)1/2
,
(73)
(74)
which is equivalent to eq. (55).
The condition (73) implies that the correction to ωc with the
account of coupling is much less than the difference between the
frequencies of oppositely propagating IW. However, as kx, kz →
∞, this difference tends to constant value ∼ κgx/gz, while the
coupling term ǫ ∼ O(k) → ∞ as far as the dust fraction is
constant. In the marginal case
Employing eq. (59) along with eq. (71), one obtains from eq. (75)
∆ ∼ 2ωi.
(75)
MNRAS 000, 1 -- ?? (2017)
the upper value of f for the ordinary mode coupling
fcr ≈
8κ
tsk
g2
x
gzg2 .
(76)
As f > fcr, it does not occur any more. In the opposite case ∆ ≫
2ωi, ∆ is determined by equation
-Reω
∆ = ǫ1/3,
(77)
which yields the following result for the growth rate of the high-k
SI for f > fcr:
∆ ≈ (cid:26)1, −
1
2 ± i
√3
2 (cid:27)(cid:18)f tsκ2k
gxgz
g (cid:19)1/3
,
(78)
which recovers an equation (5.16) of SH. Fig. 7 demonstrates that
imaginary part of eq. (78) is in much better agreement with an ac-
curate solution rather than eq. (71). Note that for the case shown in
fig. 7 fcr ≈ 0.006.
The transition from eq. (74) to eq. (77) implies than coupling
of two modes is replaced by coupling of three modes, which are
two IW and SDW. This new mechanism of instability, which can
be referred to as the triple mode coupling, is responsible for dif-
ferent dependence of RDI growth rate on the dust fraction, i.e.
ℑ[ω] ∼ O(f 1/3) instead of the more common ℑ[ω] ∼ O(f 1/2).
Eq. (76) shows that the triple mode coupling is preferential for high
wavenumbers in situations with the substantial settling of dust. Ad-
ditionally, it occurs for particles of a greater size, as fcr ∼ t−1
s .
The weaker dependence of the growth rate on the small dust frac-
tion can make the triple mode coupling the leading mechanism for
dust clumping in certain regimes, which is advisable to check in the
future work.
3.12 Bonding of inertial waves
It can be seen that in the case shown in fig. 7 the band of instability
for f = 0.01 extends unusually far towards kx → −∞. It is shown
below that this occurs due to the new instability of quasi-resonant
nature.
The zone of lower negative kx is shown in Fig. 8 for the pa-
rameters used before in Fig. 7. As one can see, a band of new in-
stability appears to the left from the band of SI produced by the
type-III crossing. The top panel of fig. 8 shows that as this new
instability sets on, the phase velocity of both modes akin to IW
vanishes. In that sense it resembles the mode coupling, however,
the other features are different:
i) the mode crossing between two IW is located formally at infinity,
kx → −∞;
ii) both IW have positive energy at kx → −∞; also, it can be
checked that, as f > 0, both modes akin to IW have positive en-
ergy outside of the band of new instability.
By these reasons, it is preferable to use a different term for this
mechanism of instability. Hereafter it is referred to as 'bonding of
IW'.
Thus, as kx → −∞, two IW propagating in the opposite di-
rections become the low-frequency modes. The difference between
their phase velocities becomes small, which makes possible the
bonding of IW caused by the coupling term, i.e. induced physi-
cally by the drag force acting on gas. Analytical estimation for the
growth rate of bonding instability of IW can be obtained along the
following lines. Similar to the case with the triple mode coupling,
the starting point is eq. (72). Now, the substitution is ω = ωb + ∆,
where ωb = 0 is not the frequency of the mode crossing as in
MNRAS 000, 1 -- ?? (2017)
Nature of the dust streaming instability
13
0,5
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
0
-0,1
-0,2
-0,3
-0,4
-0,5
0,2
0,1
1
-240
-220
-200
-180
3
2
1
2
2
3
-160
kx
1
-140
-120
-100
-80
3
2
Imω
0
-0,1
-0,2
-240
-220
-200
-180
-160
kx
-140
-120
-100
-80
Figure 7.
Illustration of the mode coupling, which produces SI with an
unbounded growth rate. Top panel: the curves show ℜ[ω] taken with the
opposite sign, where ω is the solution of the dispersion equation (49). The
parameters are q = 3/2, τ = 0.1, gx = 0.1, gz = 1.0 and kz = 15.
The dust fraction is taken as f = 0 (branches marked as '1'), f = 0.001
(branches marked as '2') and f = 0.01 (branches marked as '3'). In the
case f = 0 the solid lines correspond to SDW, while the dashed and the
dot-dashed lines correspond to IW propagating in the opposite directions.
In the case f > 0 the similar lines correspond to modes akin to SDW and
IW. Bottom panel: the imaginary part of the corresponding solution. The
filled diamonds represent the analytical solution given by eq. (65) at the
mode crossing according to eq. (59). The hollow circles represent the ap-
proximate analytical solution given by eq. (71). The filled squares represent
the approximate analytical solution given by the imaginary part of eq. (78).
All analytical estimations are made for f = 0.001 and f = 0.01.
the case of the mode coupling, but rather the average of the op-
posite frequencies of two IW taken in the case f = 0. As far as
∆ ≪ ωp, this yields
∆2 − ω2
i = −
ǫ
ωp
.
(79)
Clearly, for the range of kx < 0 lower that the type-IV crossing
both the coupling term ǫ and the frequency of SDW ωp are positive,
which implies that the bonding instability sets on as soon as
.
(80)
ω2
i < (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)
ǫ
ωp(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)
The equality in the instability condition (80) yields the following
approximate location of the bound of bonding instability along the
radial wavenumbers:
kx
kz ≈ −
gx
f gz
(81)
14
V.V. Zhuravlev
0,1
0,05
1
4
3
2
-Reω
0
-0,05
-0,1
-700
0,1
0,05
Imω
0
1
-0,05
-0,1
-700
-600
-500
-400
-300
-200
kx
2
3
2
3
4
1
3
2
-600
-500
-400
-300
-200
kx
Figure 8. Bonding of low-frequency inertial waves propagating in the op-
posite directions. Top panel: the curves show ℜ[ω] taken with the opposite
sign, where ω is the solution of the dispersion equation (49). The parameters
are q = 3/2, τ = 0.1, gx = 0.1, gz = 1.0 and kz = 15. The dust fraction
is taken as f = 0 (branches marked as '1'), f = 0.002 (branches marked
as '2'), f = 0.0023 (branches marked as '3') and f = 0.01 (branches
marked as '4'). In the case f = 0 the dashed and the dot-dashed lines cor-
respond to IW propagating in the opposite directions. In the case f > 0 the
similar lines correspond to modes akin to IW. Bottom panel: the imaginary
part of the corresponding solution.
provided that there is a sufficient dust radial drift:
gx ≫ 2f 1/2gz.
(82)
Note that kx ≫ kz in this limit.
As far as the absolute value of kx/kz is much higher than the
corresponding absolute value of (81), the estimation of the growth
rate is
rate of the bonding instability as
ℑ[ω] . κf
gz
gx
,
(84)
which shows that it scales with the first power of the dust fraction,
but still is comparable to SI growth rate in situation when dust set-
tling dominates the radial drift of the dust. Eq. (84) implies that in
geometrically thin disc the latter occurs as long as h/r0 . f 1/2,
which is commonly the case. It is also important that, similar to SI,
bonding instability does not depend on ts.
4 RDI BEYOND TVA
The analysis performed above shows that there is no RDI5 in the
absence of settling, gz → 0, within TVA. The solutions of eq. (49)
become symmetric with respect to change kx → −kx, so that both
type-I and type-IV crossings provide the identical avoided crossing,
see eq. (69). Hereafter it is assumed that kx > 0. Thus, in order to
recover RDI obtained by SH in the case of the dust radial drift with
no settling, the next order terms over the small τ∗ and λ−1 must
be retained. Note that this concerns not only the terms ∼ U V , but
also the smallest terms ∼ V 2 by the following reasoning. Since the
condition of the mode crossing is now
tsgxkx =
kz
k
κ,
(85)
by the order of magnitude
tsg/lev ∼ Ω0
in the vicinity of resonance, which implies that λ−1 ∼ τ∗, i.e. the
terms ∼ V 2 in eq. (11-12) are comparable to the inertial terms in
eq. (12).
4.1 Stationary solution
Given the vertical gravity be negligible, gz = 0, the general set of
equations (11-14) have the following stationary solution
U = 0,
∇(p + p0)
ρ
= −gxex,
ρp = const,
V = −tsgxex + t2
sgxey,
(86)
(87)
(88)
(89)
∆ = ±iκf 1/2(cid:18) gz
gx
kz
kx(cid:19)1/2
.
(83)
where the terms ∼ τ 3 and smaller have been omitted.
As for RDI, the growth rate of bonding instability ∝ f 1/2, which
is a feature of resonant mechanism. However, here it is referred to
as 'quasi-resonant' by the reasons mentioned above in this Section.
It was checked that eq. (83) gives a slight overestimation of an
accurate value, nevertheless, the both values approach each other
while kx → ∞. The frequency of corresponding gas-dust mode
is imaginary, which means that bonding instability is provided by
standing exponentially growing perturbations.
4.2 Reduced dispersion equation
Here the strategy is to rederive the dispersion equation from the
general set of equations for axisymmetric perturbations relaxing
TVA, though adding the corresponding higher-order terms in τ in
the coupling term only. For this reason, it is referred to as the re-
duced dispersion equation. The higher-order corrections either to
By virtue of eq. (81) one can put the upper limit on the growth
5 as well as the bonding instability
MNRAS 000, 1 -- ?? (2017)
Dg or to Dp are not considered as those are not relevant to RDI,
modifying the non-resonant dynamics of modes akin to IW or SDW
and introducing (probably imaginary) corrections to the frequen-
cies ωi and ωp, which are ∼ f , rather than ∼ f 1/2 as for the RDI
growth rate.
The set of full equations (11-14) yields the following equa-
tions for modes of linear gas-dust perturbations provided that the
stationary solution is given by eqs. (86-89)
−iω ux − 2Ω0 uy + Fx = −ikx W − f gxδ,
−iω uy +
κ2
2Ω0
ux + Fy = 0,
−iω uz + Fz = −ikz W ,
(90)
(91)
(92)
Nature of the dust streaming instability
15
a single term ∼ O(f ) which is also omitted in the new equation for
δ.
At last, the set of eqs. (90-97) is rearranged as the following
−iω φ − ωkx uz + 2Ω0 = −if gxkz(1 − itsωp)δ,
(103)
−iω −
κ2
2Ω0
φ = 0,
ωkx −
κ2
2Ω0
k2
z uz = −f kzω
κ2
2Ω0
δ,
(104)
(105)
(ω − ωp)kz δ − 2τ (1 + itsω − 2itsωp) ikx = 0.
(106)
Eqs. (103-106) lead to the reduced dispersion equation
−iωvx − 2Ω0 vy − ikxtsgx ux + Gx = ikx W + f gx δ −
vx
ts
, (93)
where
Dg(ω, k) · Dp(ω, k) = ǫ(ω, k),
(107)
k2
z
ikxω2
gxk2
ǫ ≡ −tsf κ2kxgx
k2 (1 + itsω − 2itsωp)(cid:18)1 +
z − itsωp(cid:19)
(108)
and it is assumed that ωp is given by equation (102). Clearly, ǫ → ǫ
in the leading order in τ .
In turns out that in the vicinity of resonance (85) the solution
of equation (108) is in a good agreement with the solution of the
full dispersion equation derived from equations (90-97), see Fig. 1
of SH.
The approximate solution of eq. (49) at the mode crossing of
IW and SDW given by eq. (55) with the replacement ǫ → ǫωc
applied to equation (107) yields
∆ ≈ ±κ(cid:18) f
2(cid:19)1/2 kz
k (cid:20)1 + i
tsκ
2
kz
k (cid:18)2 +
k2
x
k2
z (cid:19)(cid:21) ,
(109)
where the resonance condition (85) is used. Eq. (109) recovers the
result of SH, see their equation (5.10).
Consideration of RDI of radially streaming dust reveals that
the underlying mechanism goes beyond the concept of the mode
coupling. In this situation, RDI is caused by a quasi-resonant pro-
cess manifested in the growth/damping of the uncoupled modes
both having positive energy and slightly different phase velocities
at the mode crossing. Moreover, as the dust fraction increases, the
growth rate increases along with the degree of the decoupling be-
tween IW and SDW, see eq. (109). At the same time, such a mecha-
nism is generally weaker than the mode coupling as it emerges due
to inertia of solids represented by the next-order terms in τ entering
an augmented coupling term (108).
−iωvy +
κ2
2Ω0
vx− ikxtsgx uy + Gy = −f tsgx
κ2
2Ω0
δ−
vy
ts
, (94)
−iωvz − ikxtsgx uz + Gz = ikz W −
vz
ts
,
kx ux + kz uz = f (kxvx + kz vz) − f tsgxkxδ,
−f ωδ + kx ux + kz uz = 0,
(95)
(96)
(97)
where it is assumed that f ≪ 1, the terms ∼ f 2 have been omitted
and
F ≡ f Vxikx(δ V + 2v)
G ≡
1
(1 + f )2 Vxikx(v − f δV).
(98)
(99)
The further derivation proceeds along the lines which lead to
eqs. (31-34). That is, the coupling term is a product of combinations
of terms containing δ in eqs. (90-92) and the term containing uy in
eq. (97), after the latter has been rearranged with the help of eqs.
(93-96).
First, the components of perturbation of the relative velocity
can be represented in the following way
vx ≈ ts [2Ω0
k2
k2 uy−iωp ux](1+itsω−itsωp)−2i Ω0t2
x
sωp uy+O(f δ),
(100)
5 CONCLUSIONS
kxkz
k2 uy−iωp uz](1+itsω−itsωp)+O(f δ), (101)
vz ≈ ts [2Ω0
where it is assumed that
ωp = −tsgxkx
(102)
and the higher order terms ∼ τ 3 have been omitted. Therefore, for
purpose of this Section the term containing v in eq. (98) can be
omitted hereafter. Eqs. (100-101) are substituted into eq. (96), so
the second terms in square brackets of eqs. (100-101) yield together
This study is focused on the nature of local instability of gas-dust
mixture with dust streaming in protoplanetary disc. Previously, SH
revealed that in the leading order in small f axisymmetric pertur-
bations grow due to RDI, which provides the growth rate ∝ f 1/2.
Here RDI is reconsidered in terms of perturbations of the center-of-
mass velocity and the relative velocity of gas-dust mixture as well
as perturbation of dust density. This allows for the analysis of RDI
within TVA. The dynamics of modes of perturbations is considered
in the general case of dust settling combined with dust radial drift
MNRAS 000, 1 -- ?? (2017)
16
V.V. Zhuravlev
see eqs. (31-34). The usefull framework of the Lagrangian pertur-
bation theory for neutral modes of perturbations is applied to two-
fluid model in order to show the existence of negative energy waves
in such a flow from fundamental symmetry of the system with re-
spect to translations in time, see eq. (48). Generally, the negative
energy wave is akin to SDW, while it becomes identical to SDW in
the absence of dust back reaction on gas, which is reproduced by
the formal limit f → 0. The energy of SDW is given by eq. (47). In
the particular case of the dust settling without radial drift, there is
a straightforward generalisation of variational principle onto arbi-
trary linear gas-dust perturbations, which makes it possible to show
that the energy of growing/damping modes vanishes, see the Ap-
pendix B.
The dispersion equation (49) for gas-dust perturbations with
the account for dust back reaction on gas is reduced to form typical
for systems with the mode coupling. In the absence of the coupling
term the dispersion equation splits into two independent equations
describing one SDW and two oppositely propagating IW, respec-
tively. As the dispersion curve of SDW crosses the dispersion curve
of IW, the modes fall in resonance, and the corresponding point of
phase space is referred to as the mode crossing. There can be up to
four mode crossings for the given free parameters of the model, see
Fig. 2. The formal classification of mode crossings is suggested in
table 1. Their existence in phase space is outlined in table 2. Type-
I crossing occurs for any combination of settling and radial drift,
though in the limited range of wavenumbers. Type-II crossing oc-
curs in the limited range of wavenumbers, but for the substantial
settling only. Type-III crossing occurs for the substantial settling
only, but at sufficiently high wavenumbers. Type-III′ crossing re-
places type-III crossing as radial drift of the dust dominates its set-
tling. At last, type-IV crossing occurs for all wavenumbers each
time there is a radial drift of the dust. In the marginal case of dust
streaming only vertically there are type-I,II crossings identical to
each other, whereas, in the marginal case of dust streaming only
radially there are type-I,IV crossings identical to each other.
The definite criterion for the existence of SI, i.e. RDI in the
presence of the dust settling, at the given mode crossing is for-
mulated in Section 3.5: the energy of SDW evaluated at the mode
crossing must be negative. In the opposite case of the positive en-
ergy of SDW, the avoided crossing occurs, which gives no insta-
bility within TVA. The avoided crossing takes place for type-IV
crossing and also for type-I crossing in the case of a sufficient ra-
dial drift of solids, see the conditions (66-67). In other situations
the mode crossing provides SI. SI occurs due to the energy transfer
from (negative energy) SDW to (positive energy) IW in the vicin-
ity of the corresponding mode crossing. The coupled modes are
represented by the complex conjugate pair of frequencies obtained
from the accurate solution of the dispersion equation, see Figs. (1,3-
6). The band of instability expands in the space of wavevectors as
the coupling term in the dispersion equation, which is proportional
to the dust mass fraction, becomes larger. SI attains the maximum
growth rate approximately at the mode crossing. It is estimated ana-
lytically employing the usual mode coupling approach, see eq. (55).
Eq. (55) also indicates that within TVA the correction to the mode
frequency due to the dust back reaction on gas is generally inde-
pendent on ts. The latter applies to both the mode coupling and the
avoided crossing.
The branch of SI having an unbounded asymptotics of growth
rate at high wavenumbers is provided by mode coupling at type-
III(′) crossing. The corresponding analytical estimate of maximum
growth rate is given by eq. (71). Note that it is determined solely
by the rate of vertical settling ∼ tsgz despite the presence of ra-
dial drift necessary for the very existence of the considered mode
coupling. Also, this branch of SI takes place for wavenumbers of
different signs, i.e. either for kz > 0 and kx < 0, or for kz < 0
and kx > 0. Further, as far as k increases for constant dust frac-
tion, the distance between type-III and type-IV crossings in phase
space tends to a constant value, whereas the absolute value of the
coupling term grows up. Eventually, the ordinary coupling between
SDW and one of IW is replaced by the triple coupling between
SDW and the both of IW, see Section 3.11 for details. As a result,
the growth rate acquires a different dependence on the dust fraction,
∝ f 1/2→1/3. The triple mode coupling yields eq. (78) for estima-
tion of the maximum growth rate, which recovers the result of SH.
Note that unlike eq. (71) it explicitly depends on both components
of gravitational acceleration.
For the absolute value of radial wavenumber even higher than
that of type-III,IV crossings, an additional branch of instability
emerges, see Section 3.12 for details. For the sufficiently high dust
fraction it is attached to the band of instability provided by the
mode coupling at type-III crossing, see the curve marked '3' on the
bottom panel of Fig. 7. As is shown in Fig. 8, the new instability
appears in the region where two low-frequency oppositely propa-
gating IW coalesce with each other, while their phase velocity van-
ishes. As in the case of the mode coupling, the dust back reaction
on gas, which introduces the coupling term of the dispersion equa-
tion, is responsible for this new process. However, the underlying
mechanism of growth is different, since the coalesced modes have
positive energy and there is no resonance between the modes in the
limit f → 0. Nevertheless, the low-frequency IW approach each
other in phase space as kx → ∞, while the growth rate of new
instability ∝ f 1/2, see eq. (83). By these reasons, in this study it is
referred to as quasi-resonant instability of bonding IW. The upper
limit of the bonding instability estimated by eq. (84) confirms that
this instability is important along with SI in the situation when the
settling of the dust dominates its radial drift.
The short wavelengths typical for both the triple mode cou-
pling and the bonding instability are susceptible to dissipation ef-
fects in a disc. The influence of effective viscosity of gas on these
branches of instability should be considered in the future work in
order to understand their relevance for structure formation in real
protoplanetary discs. Besides, moderate dissipation may not neces-
sarily lead to damping of high-wavenumber SI. In contrast, it may
cause an additional non-resonant growth of negative energy mode
akin to SDW. This issue will be addressed in the subsequent stud-
ies.
In the limit of the dust streaming only radially, gx ≫ gz, or
equivalently gz → 0, SI ceases to operate. The growth rate due to
the mode coupling produced by type-I crossing vanishes according
to eq. (68), while the mode coupling produced by type-III(′) cross-
ing shifts towards k → ∞ to be suppressed by any small amount
of viscosity, see eqs. (70), (71) and (78). Strictly for gz = 0, there
exist type-I and type-IV crossings identical to each other, which
produce the avoided crossings with the account for dust back reac-
tion on gas. Thus, there is no RDI within TVA when dust is sub-
ject only to radial drift. RDI is recovered by retaining the terms of
the orders of τ∗, √λ−1 and λ−1 from the full equations (11-12),
which contribute to the coupling term of the dispersion equation,
see eqs. (107-108). It turns out that in the vicinity of resonance be-
tween SDW and IW all those terms yield the imaginary correction
∼ O(τ ) to the coupling term. Therefore, the two separate branches
of neutral modes representing the avoided crossing acquire small
growing/damping. In this way, it becomes clear that the streaming
instability of Youdin & Goodman (2005) is provided by resonant
MNRAS 000, 1 -- ?? (2017)
mechanism other than the mode coupling responsible for SI. This
new mechanism remains obscured. Though, it should be related to
the inertia of solids, because the latter is exactly what is neglected
in TVA. Also, its relationship with the inertia of solids naturally ex-
plains the increase of the growth rate with the size of the particles.
The dispersion equation obtained beyond TVA, see eq. (107),
is a reduced one, since the corrections ∼ O(f ) to the disper-
sion relations of IW and SDW given, respectively, by Dg and Dp,
have been omitted there. However, as shows the analytical study of
Jacquet et al. (2011), the modes can exhibit an intrinsic growth due
to non-resonant mechanisms. This is especially probable for neg-
ative energy SDW, what remains to be checked further. The non-
resonant growth may be important as f → 1.
The relevance of the streaming instability to planetesimal for-
mation has being extensively studied via local simulations of the
non-linear dynamics of perturbations in dust-laden disc midplane,
see the recent results by Yang et al. (2017). Although the numerical
models usually incorporate the dust settling, SI has not been found
so far, see the discussion by Squire & Hopkins (2018a). Besides, SI
might be less sensitive to external turbulence inherent in astrophysi-
cal discs, see the recent numerical study of the dust settling through
turbulent gas by Lin (2019). At last, it is highly likely that the other
RDI revealed by Squire & Hopkins (2018a) are caused by coupling
of SDW with waves of the other origin, such as sound waves and
internal gravity waves ubiquitous in protoplanetary discs. These is-
sues are relegated to future work.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author acknowledges the support from the Program of develop-
ment of M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University (Leading Sci-
entific School 'Physics of stars, relativistic objects and galaxies').
Nature of the dust streaming instability
17
Johansen A., Blum J., Tanaka H., Ormel C., Bizzarro M., Rickman H.,
2014, Protostars and Planets VI, pp 547 -- 570
Kadomtsev B. B., Mikhailovskii A. B., Timofeev A. V., 1965, Soviet Jour-
nal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, 20, 1517
Kojima Y., 1986, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 75, 251
Kojima Y., 1989, MNRAS, 236, 589
Landahl M. T., 1962, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 13, 609
Landau L. D., Lifshitz E. M., 1987, Fluid Mechanics. Oxford: Pergamon
Press
Lin M.-K., 2019, MNRAS,
Nakagawa Y., Sekiya M., Hayashi C., 1986, Icarus, 67, 375
Ogilvie G. I., 2013, MNRAS, 429, 613
Ostrovskii
L. A., Rybak
Tsimring
S. A.,
L.
Soviet Physics Uspekhi, 29, 1040
S.,
1986,
Papaloizou J. C. B., Ivanov P. B., 2010, MNRAS, 407, 1631
Papaloizou J. C. B., Pringle J. E., 1984, MNRAS, 208, 721
Papaloizou J. C. B., Pringle J. E., 1985, MNRAS, 213, 799
Papaloizou J. C. B., Pringle J. E., 1987, MNRAS, 225, 267
Pierce
Almost
2006,
All
J.,
about
Waves.
Publications,
Dover
https://books.google.ru/books?id=xeY9AQAAIAAJ
physics,
Dover
books
on
Safronov V., 1972, Evolution of
and
formation
cal
https://books.google.ru/books?id=mfnlepJCxL8C
the protoplanetary
the
cloud and
planets. NASA techni-
Scientific Translations,
Program for
translation,
Israel
earth
the
of
Squire J., Hopkins P. F., 2018a, MNRAS, 477, 5011
Squire J., Hopkins P. F., 2018b, ApJ, 856, L15
Stepanyants Y. A., Fabrikant A. L., 1989, Sov. Phys. Usp., 32, 783 (1989)
Umurhan O. M., Regev O., 2004, A&A, 427, 855
Whipple F. L., 1972, in Elvius A., ed., From Plasma to Planet. p. 211
Whitham G., 2011, Linear and Nonlinear Waves. Pure and Applied Mathe-
matics: A Wiley Series of Texts, Monographs and Tracts, Wiley
Yang C.-C., Johansen A., Carrera D., 2017, A&A, 606, A80
Youdin A. N., Goodman J., 2005, ApJ, 620, 459
Youdin A., Johansen A., 2007, ApJ, 662, 613
References
Bai X.-N., Stone J. M., 2010, ApJ, 722, 1437
Balbus S. A., 2003, ARA&A, 41, 555
Benjamin T. B., 1963, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 16, 436
Birnstiel T., Fang M., Johansen A., 2016, Space Sci. Rev., 205, 41
Briggs
interaction
Electron-stream
1964,
R.
plasmas.
http://cds.cern.ch/record/224070
J.,
Res.
Mono.,
MIT,
Cambridge,
Cairns R. A., 1979, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 92, 1
Chiang E., Youdin A. N., 2010, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences,
38, 493
Fabrikant A. L., Stepanyants Y. A., Stepaniants I. A., 1998, Propagation of
Waves in Shear Flows. World Scientific Pub Co Inc
Friedman J. L., Morsink S. M., 1998, ApJ, 502, 714
Friedman J. L., Schutz B. F., 1978a, ApJ, 221, 937
Friedman J. L., Schutz B. F., 1978b, ApJ, 222, 281
Glampedakis K., Andersson N., 2007, MNRAS, 377, 630
Glatzel W., 1987a, MNRAS, 225, 227
Glatzel W., 1987b, MNRAS, 228, 77
Glatzel W., 1988, MNRAS, 231, 795
Goldreich P., Lynden-Bell D., 1965, MNRAS, 130, 125
Goldreich P., Ward W. R., 1973, ApJ, 183, 1051
Goldreich P., Goodman J., Narayan R., 1986, MNRAS, 221, 339
Jacquet E., Balbus S., Latter H., 2011, MNRAS, 415, 3591
Johansen A., Youdin A., 2007, ApJ, 662, 627
Johansen A., Oishi J. S., Mac Low M.-M., Klahr H., Henning T., Youdin
A., 2007, Nature, 448, 1022
Johansen A., Youdin A., Mac Low M.-M., 2009, ApJ, 704, L75
MNRAS 000, 1 -- ?? (2017)
APPENDIX A: EQUATIONS FOR PERTURBATIONS IN
TVA
The perturbed state of gas-dust mixture can be described by the
small Eulerian perturbations of the centre-of-mass velocity, u, the
relative velocity, v, the gas pressure, p′, and the density of dust, ρ′
p.
Those quantities obey the corresponding linear equations
with
MA,
(∂t − qΩ0x∂y) u − 2Ω0uyex + (2 − q)Ω0uxey+
ρ′
p
,
ρ
(u∇)U + (U∇)u = −∇p′
+ ∇(p + p0)
ρ
ρ
∇p′
ρ − ∇(p + p0)
ρ
ρ′
p
ρ
=
v
ts
,
∇ ·(cid:18)u −
ρp
ρ
v −
ρg
ρ
ρ′
p
ρ
V(cid:19) = 0,
(∂t − qΩ0x∂y) ρ′
p + ∇(ρ′
pU + ρ u) = 0.
(A1)
(A2)
(A3)
(A4)
The set of eqs. (A1-A4) describes the evolution of gas-dust
perturbations for any stationary solution of eqs. (18), (19), (13) and
(14) on the length-scales much shorter than the scaleheight of a thin
protoplanetary disc. Eqs. (A1-A4) become much more simple for
the particular background model considered in Section 3.1.
18
V.V. Zhuravlev
Once the background model is specified by eqs. (22-25), one
A2 Equations for perturbations in the appropriate variables
arrives at the following equations for perturbations
(∂t − qΩ0x∂y) u − 2Ω0uyex + (2 − q)Ω0uxey =
δg,
f
−∇W +
1 + f
(∂t − qΩ0x∂y) δ = −ts∇2W −
1 − f
1 + f
ts(g∇)δ,
∇ · u =
tsf
1 + f ∇2W + tsf
1 − f
(1 + f )2 (g∇)δ,
It is appropriate to reformulate eqs. (A8-A12) in terms of the vari-
ables
χ ≡ {, φ, uz, δ}.
(A13)
It is assumed that components of χ have non-zero derivatives
over t, x, z, which are denoted below as ∂kχi. The usual Einstein's
rule of summation over the repeated upper and lower indices is
assumed as well.
First, taking the curl of eqs. (A8-A10) yields the following
tzux − ∂2
∂2
txuz = 2Ω0∂zuy + f (gz∂xδ − gx∂zδ),
(A14)
(A5)
(A6)
(A7)
where W ≡ p′/ρ and the relative perturbation of the dust density
δ ≡ ρ′
p/ρp. Note that eqs. (A5-A7) are valid for f not necessarily
of the small value.
A1 Equations for axisymmetric perturbations in the leading
order in small dust fraction
Let additionally the dust fraction be small f ≪ 1 and perturbations
have axial symmetry. Eqs. (A5-A7) yield
∂tux − 2Ω0uy = −∂xW − f gxδ,
∂tuy + (2 − q)Ω0ux = 0,
∂tuz = −∂zW − f gzδ,
∂tδ = −ts(∂2
xx + ∂2
zz)W + ts(gz∂zδ + gx∂xδ),
(A8)
(A9)
(A10)
(A11)
∂xux + ∂zuz = 0.
(A12)
Hence, in this the most simple case the small gas-dust per-
turbations of dust streaming through the static gas environment
both vertically and radially are described by eqs. (A8-A10, A12)
for perturbation of the centre-of-mass velocity, u. These equations
are identical to equations for single-fluid dynamics of vortical per-
turbations in a rotating plane shear flow, see e.g. equations (6-9)
of Umurhan & Regev (2004) with ∂y = 0, except for the terms in
the RHS of eqs. (A8) and (A10) proportional to perturbation of the
dust density. At the same time, perturbation of the dust density is
the only quantity that additionally describes the dynamics of dust
by means of eq. (A11). The perturbed flow of dust is affected by
gas through the term ∝ ∇2W in the RHS of eq. (A11). In the limit
f → 0 the set of eqs. (A8-A12) splits into eqs. (A8-A10, A12),
which determine the dynamics of solely the gas perturbations with
u becoming identical to the velocity of gas, and eq. (A11), which
separately determines the dynamics of dust perturbations. In the
latter situation, solids move passively under the action of external
gravity and aerodynamic drag. If additionally ts → 0, both the
background relative velocity and the perturbation of relative veloc-
ity vanish, which results in the conservation of the density of dust
frozen in the divergence-free motion of gas.
The main results of this paper come out from eqs. (A8-A12).
−∂2
tzuy = (2 − q)Ω0∂zux,
∂2
txuy = (2 − q)Ω0∂zuz.
(A15)
(A16)
Note that eqs. (A14-A16) are identical to equations describ-
ing IW in rigidly rotating fluid provided that q = f = 0, see e.g.
Landau & Lifshitz (1987), paragraph 14. The LHS of eqs. (A14-
A16) are the time derivatives of components of vorticity perturba-
tion6.
Next, the divergence of eqs. (A8-A10) yields
(∂2
xx + ∂2
zz)W = 2Ω0∂xuy − f (gx∂xδ + gz∂zδ).
(A17)
Taking additional derivatives over z from equations (A11),
(A17), (A16) and employing eq. (A12) one comes to the final set
of equations for the new variables
∂tφ = ∂2
txuz − 2Ω0 + f (gz∂xδ − gx∂zδ),
∂t =
κ2
2Ω0
φ,
∂2
tx = −
κ2
2Ω0
∂2
zzuz,
∂2
tzδ = ts(gz∂2
xzδ) + 2τ ∂x,
where the term ∝ f ts has been neglected in eq. (A21).
zzδ + gx∂2
(A18)
(A19)
(A20)
(A21)
APPENDIX B: VARIATIONAL PRINCIPLE FOR
DYNAMICS OF GENERAL GAS-DUST PERTURBATIONS
IN THE CASE OF THE DUST VERTICAL SETTLING
The set of eqs. (A18-A21) for gx = 0 can be derived from the
requirement that action
S = Z L(χi, ∂kχi)d2x dt
with the Lagrangian density
L = L0 + fL1
(B1)
(B2)
6 In this work vorticity is a curl of the center-of-mass velocity of gas-dust
mixture rather than a curl of the velocity of gas
MNRAS 000, 1 -- ?? (2017)
be stationary with respect to arbitrary variations of χi in the small
shearing box. Similar to the variational principle for modes, see
eq. (36), the subscript '0' denotes the contribution to the full La-
grangian responsible for the dynamics of gas-dust perturbations
with no account for the drag force acting on gas, while the sub-
script '1' denotes additional contribution to L responsible solely
for the dynamics of dust. If so, eqs. (A18-A21) are identical to the
Euler-Lagrange equations
δχi − ∂k(cid:18) δL
δL
δ(∂kχi)(cid:19) = 0,
where explicitly
L0 = −∂tφ − ∂tuz∂x − Ω02 −
κ2
2Ω0
φ2
2 −
κ2
2Ω0
(∂zuz)2
,
2
Nature of the dust streaming instability
19
subsequently averaged over the wavelength of mode. Eqs. (31-34)
provide the following result
(ℜ[ω])2 + (ℑ[ω])2
k2
k2
z
+
κ2
E = 2e2ℑ[ω]t(cid:26)1 +
(ℜ[ω] + tsgzkz)2 + (ℑ[ω])2 (cid:20) 2ts
where k2 ≡ k2
x + k2
z .
f gzk2
x
kz
(ℜ[ω] + tsgzkz) − gzt2
s(cid:21)(cid:27) ,
(B8)
In this way, one obtains the averaged energy density of the
mode of gas-dust mixture perturbations for a particular wavevector
k, provided that its (complex) frequency is known, i.e. there is a
solution of a dispersion equation.
(B3)
B2.1 Approximate solution at the mode crossing and the vanish
of the mode energy
Eq. (49) is cubic with respect to ω. Seeking the Cardano solution
of eq. (49) for gx = 0 at the mode crossing (57) one finds that the
discriminant
Q =
8
27
f κ6 k2
xk4
k6 (cid:18)1 +
z
27
32
f
k2
x
k2
z (cid:19)
vanishes for f = 0, and eq. (49) acquires a double root. Then,
any small non-zero f > 0 makes Q be a positive value, which
implies that a double root of eq. (49) acquires the adjoint couple of
imaginary parts, i.e. the instability sets on in some band around the
mode crossing.
In the case of small non-zero f > 0 the Taylor expansion of
the Cardano solution of eq. (49) by the orders of f 1/2 at the mode
crossing yields the following approximate real and imaginary parts
of the frequency
ℜ[ω]
ωc
= 1 +
f
8
k2
x
k2
z
,
ℑ[ω]
ωc
= ±(cid:18) f
2(cid:19)1/2 kx
kz (cid:18)1 −
(B9)
(B10)
5f
64
k2
x
k2
z (cid:19) .
Note that eq. (B10) recovers eq. (58) in the leading order in f 1/2.
It is straightforward to check that expressions (B9) and (B10) make
E as given by eq. (B8) vanish for any small f > 0.
L1 = gz (cid:26)∂xδ −
1
2Ω0 (cid:20) ∂tδ∂zδ
2ts − gz
(∂zδ)2
2
(cid:21)(cid:27) .
(B4)
The first term in L1 is the generalized cross-term, cf. eq. (39). Like
the Lagrangian (37), L is known up to an arbitrary constant factor
chosen so that the energy of IW propagating in rigidly rotating fluid
be positive.
B1 Energy of general gas-dust perturbations
The energy of general perturbations associated with the invariance
of L with respect to translations in time is E ≡ R E d2x, where
E = −L +
δL
δ(∂tχi)
∂tχi
is the energy density. Similar to the energy density of mode (45), it
consists of the main part recovering the energy density of general
gas perturbations in rotating flow in the absence of dust, and addi-
tional contribution related to general perturbations of dust density
Explicitly,
E = E0 + fE1.
(B5)
E0 = Ω02 +
κ2
2Ω0
φ2
2
+
κ2
2Ω0
(∂zuz)2
2
,
(B6)
E1 = −gz (cid:26)∂xδ +
gz
2Ω0
(∂zδ)2
2 (cid:27) .
(B7)
It is straightforward to check that eqs. (A18-A21) guarantee
that ∂tE can be represented as the divergence of vector, which is
identified with the energy flux vanishing along with perturbations
χi as one goes to infinity. E0 is of course a positive definite quantity
in centrifugally stable flows, while E1 can have any sign depending
on the contribution of the cross term. However, the net contribu-
tion of the cross term to E can be small or even vanish for certain
non-trivial perturbations, i.e. for modes, see eq. (45). Then, owing
to perturbations of dust density, E1 gives negative amount to the
energy for the case gx = 0 considered here.
B2 Energy of growing mode
In order to obtain expression for the energy density of mode, which
is not necessarily neutral, ℜ[χi] is substituted into eq. (B5) and
MNRAS 000, 1 -- ?? (2017)
|
0907.5204 | 1 | 0907 | 2009-07-30T03:18:30 | A Third Exoplanetary System with Misaligned Orbital and Stellar Spin Axes | [
"astro-ph.EP",
"astro-ph.SR"
] | We present evidence that the WASP-14 exoplanetary system has misaligned orbital and stellar-rotational axes, with an angle lambda = 33.1 +/- 7.4 deg between their sky projections. The evidence is based on spectroscopic observations of the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect as well as new photometric observations. WASP-14 is now the third system known to have a significant spin-orbit misalignment, and all three systems have "super-Jupiter" planets (M_P > 3 Mjup) and eccentric orbits. This finding suggests that the migration and subsequent orbital evolution of massive, eccentric exoplanets is somehow different from that of less massive close-in Jupiters, the majority of which have well-aligned orbits. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph |
Draft version June 3, 2018
Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 08/22/09
A THIRD EXOPLANETARY SYSTEM WITH MISALIGNED ORBITAL AND STELLAR SPIN AXES1
John Asher Johnson2,3, Joshua N. Winn4, Simon Albrecht4,
Andrew W. Howard5,6, Geoffrey W. Marcy5, J. Zachary Gazak2
Draft version June 3, 2018
ABSTRACT
We present evidence that the WASP-14 exoplanetary system has misaligned orbital and stellar-
rotational axes, with an angle λ =−33.1◦± 7.4◦ between their sky projections. The evidence is based
on spectroscopic observations of the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect as well as new photometric observa-
tions. WASP-14 is now the third system known to have a significant spin-orbit misalignment, and all
three systems have "super-Jupiter" planets (MP > 3 MJup) and eccentric orbits. This finding sug-
gests that the migration and subsequent orbital evolution of massive, eccentric exoplanets is somehow
different from that of less massive close-in Jupiters, the majority of which have well-aligned orbits.
Subject headings: stars:
individual (WASP-14) -- planetary systems:
individual (WASP-14b) --
techniques: spectroscopic -- techniques: photometric
1. INTRODUCTION
Close-in giant planets are thought to have formed at
distances of several AU and then migrated inward to
their current locations (Lin et al. 1996). The mecha-
nism responsible for the inward migration of exoplan-
ets is still debated. Some clues about the migration
process may come from constraints on the stellar obliq-
uity: the angle between the stellar spin axis and the or-
bital axis. The sky projection of this angle, λ, can be
measured by observing and interpreting the anomalous
Doppler shift during the transit of a planet, known as the
Rossiter-McLaughlin effect (McLaughlin 1924; Rossiter
1924; Queloz et al. 2000; Winn et al. 2005; Ohta et al.
2005; Gaudi & Winn 2007). Some of the proposed mi-
gration pathways would produce large misalignments (at
least occasionally) while others would preserve the pre-
sumably close alignment that characterizes the initial
condition of planet formation.
For example, theories that invoke migration of the
planet through interactions with the gaseous protoplan-
etary disk predict small spin-orbit angles, and that ini-
tial spin-orbit misalignments and eccentricities should be
damped out (Lin et al. 1996; Moorhead & Adams 2008;
Lubow & Ogilvie 2001). On the other hand,
impul-
sive processes such as close encounters between planets
(Chatterjee et al. 2008; Ford & Rasio 2008) or dynami-
cal relaxation (Juri´c & Tremaine 2008) should drive sys-
tems out of alignment. The Kozai mechanism also pro-
Electronic address: [email protected]
1 Based on data collected at Subaru Telescope, which is oper-
ated by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan; the Keck
Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership among
the California Institute of Technology, the University of California,
and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; and the
UH 2.2-meter telescope.
2 Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI
96822; NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellow
3 NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellow
4 Department of Physics, and Kavli Institute for Astrophysics
and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cam-
bridge, MA 02139
5 Department of Astronomy, University of California, Mail Code
3411, Berkeley, CA 94720
6 Townes Postdoctoral Fellow, Space Sciences Laboratory, Uni-
versity of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-7450 USA
duces large orbital tilts (Wu & Murray 2003, Fabrycky &
Tremaine 2007). Ultimately the hope is that the predic-
tions of migration theories can be compared with an en-
semble of measurements of λ (Fabrycky & Winn 2009).
In this paper we add the transiting exoplanet WASP-
14 b to the growing collection of systems for which the
projected spin-orbit angle has been measured. WASP-
14 is a relatively bright (V = 9.75) F5V star which was
discovered by the Wide-Angle Search for Planets (Super-
WASP) to undergo periodic transits by a Jovian planet
every 2.2 days (Joshi et al. 2009, hereafter J09). The
planet is among the most massive of the known tran-
siting exoplanets, with MP = 7.3 MJup, and it has a
measurably eccentric orbit (e = 0.090 ± 0.003), which
is unusual among the hot Jupiters. J09 also reported
a measurement of the spin-orbit angle, λ = −14+21
−14 de-
grees, which is consistent with zero, but also allows for
the possibility of a significant misalignment. In the fol-
lowing section we describe our spectroscopic and photo-
metric observations of WASP-14, made in an attempt to
refine the measurement of λ. In § 3 we present evidence
for a large spin-orbit misalignment based on our radial-
velocity measurements obtained during transit. We sum-
marize the results of our joint analysis of our photometric
and spectroscopic monitoring in § 4, and present tenta-
tive evidence of an emerging trend between spin-orbit
misalignment, and the physical and orbital characteris-
tics of close-in exoplanets.
2. OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION
2.1. Radial Velocity Measurements
We observed the transit predicted by J09 to occur on
2009 June 17 using the High-Dispersion Spectrometer
(HDS, Noguchi et al. 2002) on the Subaru 8.2 m Tele-
scope atop Mauna Kea in Hawaii. We obtained spectra
of WASP-14 through an iodine cell using the I2b spec-
trometer setting and a 0.′′8 slit, providing a resolution
of approximately 60, 000. We started our observing se-
quence just after evening twilight, about 20 min before
the predicted time of ingress. We continued our observa-
tions until 2.5 hr after egress when the star set below 20◦
elevation. For most of our observations we used exposure
2
]
1
−
s
m
[
y
t
i
c
o
e
V
l
l
i
a
d
a
R
1000
500
0
−500
−1000
]
1
−
s
m
[
C
−
O
40
20
0
−20
−40
WASP−14 Transit
UH2.2m/OPTIC
rms = 0.00081
x
u
l
f
e
v
i
t
l
a
e
R
1.000
0.995
0.990
C
−
O
0.002
0.001
0.000
−0.001
−0.002
−1.0
−0.5
0.0
Time since midtransit [days]
0.5
1.0
−4
−2
0
Time since midtransit [hr]
2
4
Fig. 1. -- Relative radial velocity measurements of WASP-14
as a function of orbital phase, expressed in days since midtransit.
The symbols are as follows: Subaru (circles), Keck (squares), Joshi
et al. 2009 (triangles). The lower panel shows the residuals after
subtracting the best-fitting model including both the Keplerian
radial velocity and the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect.
times of 5 min, yielding a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of
100 -- 120 pixel−1 at 5500 A, the central wavelength of the
range with plentiful iodine absorption lines. At high air-
mass we increased our exposure times to 10 min.
We also obtained 8 radial velocity measurements of the
G2V star HD 127334 on the same night, 2009 June 17.
HD 127334 is a long-term target of the California Planet
Search. Keck/HIRES radial velocity measurements over
the past 3 years show that the star is stable with an rms
scatter of 2.5 m s−1. With HDS we used exposure times
ranging from 60 to 120 seconds, resulting in SNR ranging
from 110 -- 120 pixel−1 at 5500 A.
We also obtained out-of-transit (OOT) radial velocities
of WASP-14 using the High-Resolution (HIRES) spec-
trometer on the Keck I telescope starting in July 2008.
We set up the HIRES spectrometer in the same man-
ner that has been used consistently for the California
Planet Search (Howard et al. 2009). Specifically, we em-
ployed the red cross -- disperser and used the I2 absorption
cell to calibrate the instrumental response and the wave-
length scale (Marcy & Butler 1992). The slit width was
set by the 0.′′86 B5 decker, and the typical exposure times
ranged from 3-10 min, giving a resolution of about 60,000
and a SNR of 140-250 pixel−1 at 5500 A.
For the spectra obtained at both telescopes, we per-
formed the Doppler analysis with the algorithm of
Butler et al. (1996), as updated over the years. A clear,
Pyrex cell containing iodine gas is placed in front of the
spectrometer entrance slit. The dense forest of molecu-
lar lines imprinted on each stellar spectrum provides a
measure of the wavelength scale at the time of the obser-
vation, as well as the shape of the instrumental response
(Marcy & Butler 1992). The Doppler shifts were mea-
sured with respect to a "template" spectrum based on
a higher-resolution Keck/HIRES observation from which
the spectrometer instrumental response was removed, as
far as possible, through deconvolution. We estimated the
measurement error in the Doppler shift derived from a
given spectrum based on the weighted standard devia-
Fig. 2. -- Top Panel: Relative photometry of WASP-14 during
the transit of 2009 May 12. Bottom Panel: Residuals from the
best-fitting transit light curve model.
tion of the mean among the solutions for individual 2 A
spectral segments. The typical measurement error was
1.0-1.7 m s−1 for the Keck data and 6 m s−1 for the Sub-
aru data. The RV data are given in Table 1 and plotted
in Figure 1.
2.2. Photometric Measurements
We observed the photometric transit of 2009 May 12
with the University of Hawaii 2.2 m (UH2.2m) telescope
on Mauna Kea. We used the Orthogonal Parallel Trans-
fer Imaging Camera (OPTIC), which is equipped with
two Lincoln Labs CCID128 orthogonal transfer array
(OTA) detectors (Tonry et al. 1997). Each OTA detector
has 2048×4096 pixels and a scale of 0.′′135 pixel−1. OTA
devices can shift accumulated charge in two dimensions
during an exposure. We took advantage of this charge-
shifting capability to create large square-shaped point
spread functions (PSFs) that permit longer exposures be-
fore reaching saturation (Howell et al. 2003; Tonry et al.
2005; Johnson et al. 2009).
We observed the transit of WASP-14 continuously for
5.5 hr spanning the transit. We observed through a cus-
tom bandpass filter centered at 850 nm with a 40 nm
full-width at half-maximum. We shifted the accumulated
charge every 50 ms to trace out a square-shaped region
25 pixels on a side. Exposure times were 50 s, and were
separated by a gap of 29 s to allow for readout and re-
freshing of the detectors. Bias subtraction and flat-field
calibrations were applied using custom IDL procedures
described by Johnson et al. (2009).
The only suitable comparison star that fell within the
OPTIC field of view is a V = 12.1 star ∼ 6 arcmin-
utes to the Northeast. The fluxes from the target and
the single comparison star were measured by summing
the counts within a square aperture of 64 pixels on a
side. Most of the light, including the scattered-light halo,
was encompassed by the aperture. We estimated the
background from the outlier-rejected mean of the counts
from four rectangular regions flanking each of the stars
(Johnson et al. 2009). As a first order correction for vari-
ations in sky transparency, we divided the the flux of
WASP-14 by the flux of the comparison star. The tran-
sit light curve is shown in Figure 2, and the photometric
measurements and times of observations (HJD) are listed
in Table 2.
3. DATA ANALYSIS
3.1. Updated Ephemeris
The first step in our analysis was to refine the esti-
mate of the orbital period using the midtransit time de-
rived from our OPTIC light curve. We fitted a transit
model to the light curve based on the analytic formulas
of Mandel & Agol (2002) for a quadratic limb-darkening
law. The adjustable parameters were the midtransit time
Tt, the scaled stellar radius R⋆/a (where a is the semima-
jor axis), the planet-star radius ratio RP /R⋆, the orbital
7,
inclination i, the limb darkening coefficients u1 and u2
and two parameters k and m0 describing the correction
for differential airmass extinction. The airmass correc-
tion was given by
mcor = mobs + m0 + kz
(1)
where mobs is the observed instrumental magnitude, z is
the airmass, and mcor is the corrected magnitude that is
compared to the transit model (Winn et al. 2009).
We used the rms of the OOT measurements as an
estimate for the individual measurement uncertainties.
We did not find evidence for significant time-correlated
noise using the time-averaging method of Pont et al.
(2006). We fitted the light curve model and esti-
mated our parameter uncertainties using a Markov Chain
Monte Carlo algorithm (MCMC; Tegmark et al. 2004;
Ford 2005; Gregory 2005). The results for the midtran-
sit time, and the refined orbital period (using the new
midtransit time and the midtransit time given by J09)
are
Tc = 2454889.8921 ± 0.00025
P = 2.2437704 ± 0.0000028 days.
(2)
(3)
The other derived lightcurve parameters were consistent
with those reported by J09.
3.2. Evidence for Spin-Orbit Misalignment: A Simple
Analysis
Figure 2 shows our Subaru/HDS and Keck/HIRES RV
measurements made near transit, after subtracting the
best-fitting Keplerian orbital model. The RVs measured
just after ingress are redshifted with respect to the Ke-
plerian orbital velocity. We interpret this "anomalous"
redshift as being due to the blockage by the planet of
the blueshifted limb of the rotating stellar surface. We
therefore conclude that the planet's orbit is prograde.
In addition, the anomalous redshift persists until about
1 hr after midtransit. This is evidence for a misalignment
between the orbital axis and stellar rotation axis. Were
λ = 0, the midpoint of the transit chord would be on
the projection of the stellar rotation axis, and therefore
the anomalous Doppler shift would vanish at midtransit,
in contradiction of the data. Thus we can conclude that
the orbit of WASP-14 b is inclined with respect to the
projected stellar spin axis. In the next section we make
a quantitative assessment of λ.
7 We allowed both coefficients to be free parameters, subject to
the conditions 0 < u1 + u2 < 1 and u1 > 0.
3
3.3. Global Analysis of Radial Velocities and
Photometry
We simultaneously fitted a parametric model to our
OPTIC light curve and to the the 4 sets of RV
data: Subaru/HDS and Keck/HIRES (this work), and
OHP/SOPHIE and NOT/FIES (J09). To make our anal-
ysis of the RM effect largely independent of J09, we did
not include the RVs gathered by J09 during transits. The
photometric aspects of the model were given in § 3.1. The
RV model was the sum of the radial component of the
Keplerian orbital velocity, and the anomalous velocity
due to the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect. To compute the
latter, we used the "RM calibration" procedure of Winn
et al. (2005): we simulated spectra exhibiting the RM
effect at various orbital phases8, and then measured the
anomalous radial velocity ∆VR of the simulated spectra
using the same algorithm used on the actual data. We
found the results to be consistent with the formula
∆VR = −(δf )vp"1.124 − 0.395(cid:18)
vp
3.5 km s−1(cid:19)2# ,
(4)
where δf is the instantaneous fractional loss of light dur-
ing the transit and vp is the radial velocity of the occulted
portion of the stellar disk.
The 18 model parameters can be divided into 3 groups.
First are the parameters of the spectroscopic orbit: the
period P , the midtransit time Tt, the radial-velocity
semiamplitude K, the eccentricity e, the argument of
pericenter ω, and velocity offsets for each of the 4 differ-
ent groups of RV data. Second are the photometric pa-
rameters: the planet-to-star radius ratio Rp/R⋆, the or-
bital inclination i, the scaled stellar radius R⋆/a (where a
is the semimajor axis), the 2 limb-darkening coefficients,
and the out-of-transit flux and differential extinction co-
efficient. Third are the parameters relevant to the RM
effect: the projected stellar rotation rate v sin i⋆ and the
angle λ between the sky projections of the orbital axis
and the stellar rotation axis [for illustrations of the ge-
ometry, see Ohta et al. (2005), Gaudi & Winn (2007), or
Fabrycky & Winn (2009)].
The fitting statistic was
247
χ2 =
64
+
σf,j
Xj=1(cid:20) fj(obs) − fj(calc)
Xj=1(cid:20) vj(obs) − vj(calc)
0.0000028 d (cid:21)2
+(cid:20) P − 2.243770 d
σv,j
(cid:21)2
(cid:21)2
,
where fj(obs) are the relative flux data from the OPTIC
light curve and σf,j is the out-of-transit rms. Likewise
vj(obs) and σv,j are the RV measurements and uncertain-
ties. For σv,j we used the quadrature sum of the measure-
ment error and a "jitter" term of 4.4 m s−1, which was
taken from the empirical calibration of Wright (2004).
8 For the template spectrum, which should be similar to that
of WASP-14 but with slower rotation, we used a Keck/HIRES
spectrum of HD 3681 (Tef f = 6220 K, [Fe/H]= +0.08; v sin i⋆ =
2.8 ± 0.5 km s−1 Valenti & Fischer 2005).
4
]
1
−
s
m
[
y
t
i
c
o
e
v
l
l
i
a
d
a
R
20
10
0
−10
−20
20
10
0
−10
−20
20
10
0
−10
−20
HD 127334
rms = 2.9 m/s
−4
−2
0
Time since midtransit [hr]
2
4
Fig. 3. -- Relative radial velocity measurements made during transits of WASP-14. The symbols are as follows: Subaru (circles),
Keck (squares), Joshi et al. 2009 (triangles). Top Panel: The Keplerian radial velocity has been subtracted, to isolate the Rossiter-
McLaughlin effect. The predicted times of ingress, midtransit and egress are indicated by vertical dotted lines. Middle Panel: The residuals
after subtracting the best-fitting model including both the Keplerian radial velocity and the RM effect. Bottom Panel: Subaru/HDS
measurements of the standard star HD 127334 made on the same night as the WASP-14 transit.
The final term enforces the constraint on the orbital pe-
riod based on the new ephemeris described in the previ-
ous section.
As before, we solved for the model parameters and
uncertainties using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo algo-
rithm. We used a chain length of 5 × 106 steps and
adjusted the perturbation size to yield an acceptance
rate of ∼40%. The posterior probability distributions
for each parameter were approximately Gaussian, so we
adopt the median as the "best -- fit" value and the stan-
dard deviation as the 1-σ error. For the joint model fit
the minimum χ2 is 291.4 with 295 degrees of freedom,
ν = 0.99. The contributions to the minimum χ2
giving χ2
from the flux data and the RV data were 246.1 and 45.3,
respectively. The relatively low value of the RV contri-
bution compared to the number of RV data points (64)
suggests that 4.4 m s−1 is an overestimate of the jitter
for this star, and that consequently our parameter errors
may be slightly overestimated, but to be conservative we
give the results assuming a jitter of 4.4 m s−1.
For the main parameter of interest, the projected spin-
orbit angle, our analysis gives λ = l ± 7.4◦(Figure 3).
Thus, the WASP-14 planetary system is prograde and
misaligned, as anticipated in the qualitative discussion of
§ 3.2. Our measurement of λ agrees with the value mea-
sured by J09 (−14+21
−14 deg), but with improved precision
that allows us to exclude λ = 0 with high confidence.
We find the projected stellar rotational velocity to be
v sin i⋆ = 2.80 ± 0.57 km s−1. This value is somewhat
lower than, but consistent with, the values determined
by J09 from line broadening v sin i⋆ = 3.0 ± 1.5 km s−1,
from their RM analysis v sin i⋆ = 4.7 ± 1.5 km s−1, and
from our SME analysis v sin i⋆ = 3.5 ± 0.5 km s−1. This
agreement among the rotation rates provides a consis-
tency check on our analysis. The best-fitting parameters
and their uncertainties are listed in Table 3
We found no evidence for another planet or star in the
WASP-14 system. To derive quantitative constraints on
the properties of any distant planets, we added a single
new parameter γ to our model, representing a constant
radial acceleration. A third body with mass M3 ≪ M⋆,
orbital distance a3 ≫ a and inclination i3 would produce
a typical radial accleration
γ ∼
GM3 sin i3
a2
3
,
(5)
and our result is γ = 2.0 ± 1.4 cm s−1 d −1, or 1.01 ±
0.72 MJup (5 AU)−2.
4. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION
We present new photometric and spectroscopic mea-
surements of the WASP-14 transiting exoplanetary sys-
WASP−14 Spin−Orbit Configuration
= 7.4
= −33.1
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
−0.5
−1.0
−1.5
−1.0
−0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Fig. 4. -- The spin-orbit configuration of the WASP-14 planetary
system. The star has a unit radius and the relative size of the planet
and impact parameter are taken from the best-fitting transit model.
The sky-projected angle between the stellar spin axis (diagonal
dashed line) and the planet's orbit normal (vertical dashed line) is
denoted by λ, which in this diagram is measured counter-clockwise
from the orbit normal. Our best-fitting λ is negative. The 68.3%
confidence interval for λ is traced on either side of the stellar spin
axis and denoted by σλ.
tem. By combining a new transit light curve, several
Keck/HIRES RV measurements made outside of tran-
sit, and most importantly, Subaru/HDS RVs spanning a
transit, we have measured and interpreted the RM effect.
By modeling the RM anomaly we find that the projected
stellar spin axis and the planetary orbit normal are mis-
aligned, with λ = −33.1◦± 7.4◦.
Of the 13 transiting systems with measured spin-
orbit angles, only 3 have clear indications of spin-orbit
misalignments. The other two cases besides WASP-14
are XO-3 (H´ebrard et al. 2008, Winn et al. 2009) and
HD 80606 (Gillon 2009; Pont et al. 2009, ; Winn et al.
2009c in prep).
It is striking that all 3 tilted systems
involve planets several times more massive than Jupiter
that are on eccentric orbits, and that none of the sys-
tems with eccentricities consistent with circular or with
masses smaller than 1 MJup show evidence for misalign-
ments (Figure 5).
In addition to the three known super-Jupiters with
inclined orbits,
there are also two eccentric, mas-
sive exoplanets with small projected spin-orbit angles:
HD 17156 b (Fischer et al. 2007; Barbieri et al. 2007;
Cochran et al. 2008; Narita et al. 2009) and HD 147506
(Bakos et al. 2007; Winn et al. 2007; Loeillet et al.
2008). However, neither of these cases presents as strong
an exception to the pattern as it may seem. The mea-
surement of λ in both cases was hampered by the poor
constraint on the transit impact parameter, which causes
5
a strong degeneracy between λ and v sin i (Gaudi &
Winn 2007).
It should also be kept in mind that the
measured quantity λ is only the sky-projected spin-orbit
angle, and that the true angle of one or both of those
systems may have a stellar rotation axis that is inclined
by a larger angle along our line of sight.
It was already known that the orbits of massive planets
are systematically different from the orbits of less massive
planets. For example, Wright et al. (2009), building on
a previous finding by Marcy et al. (2005), showed that
planets with minimum masses MP sin i > 1 MJup typ-
ically have lower orbital eccentricities than those with
minimum masses smaller than 1 MJup. While sub-
Jovian-mass planets have eccentricities that peak near
e = 0 with a sharp decline toward e = 0.4, those with
MP sin i > 1 MJup have eccentricities that are uniformly
distributed between e = 0 and 0.55.
The tendency for misaligned orbits to be found among
massive planets on eccentric orbits does not yet have a
clear interpretation. It may seem natural for inclined or-
bits and eccentric orbits to go together, since both incli-
nations and eccentricities can be excited by few-body dy-
namical interactions, whether through the Kozai effect,
(Fabrycky & Tremaine 2007; Wu et al. 2007) planet-
planet scattering (Juri´c & Tremaine 2008, see, e.g.,), or
scenarios combining both of these phenomena (Nagasawa
et al. 2008). However, the mass dependence of these and
other mechanisms for altering planetary orbits needs to
be clarified before any comparisons can be made to the
data.
The misalignment of the WASP-14 planetary system,
along with the previously discovered misaligned systems,
have offered a tantalizing hint of an emerging trend
among the orbital and physical properties of close-in,
transiting exoplanets. However, trends seen in small data
sets can often be misleading. To bring this picture into
better focus, a more sophisticated analysis of the extant
data, following the example of Fabrycky & Winn (2009)
may be better. And as with all astrophysical trends,
observations of a larger sample of objects will provide
a much clearer picture than any statistical analysis of
a smaller sample. Thus, additional RM observations of
transiting systems are warranted, with particular atten-
tion paid to trends with orbital eccentricity and planet
mass.
We thank the referee, Dan Fabrycky, for a remark-
ably timely and helpful review. We gratefully acknowl-
edge the assistance of the UH 2.2 m telescope staff, in-
cluding Edwin Sousa, Greg Osterman and John Dvo-
rak. Special thanks to John Tonry for his helpful dis-
cussions and comprehensive instrument documentation
for OPTIC, Debra Fischer for her HDS raw reduction
code, and Scott Tremaine for his helpful comments and
suggestions.
JAJ is an NSF Astronomy and Astro-
physics Postdoctoral Fellow with support from the NSF
grant AST-0702821. JNW thanks the NASA Origins
of Solar Systems program for support through awards
NNX09AD36G and NNX09AB33G, as well as the sup-
port of the MIT Class of 1942 Career Development
Professorship. SA acknowledges support by a Rubi-
con fellowship from the Netherlands Organisation for
Scientific Research (NWO). We also appreciate funding
6
l
]
g
e
d
[
e
g
n
a
t
i
b
r
o
−
n
p
s
.
j
o
r
P
i
90
60
30
0
−30
−60
−90
XO−3
HD 147506
HD 80606
HD 17156
WASP−14
0.0
0.2
0.4
Orbital eccentricity
0.6
0.8
1.0
Fig. 5. -- The eccentricities and projected spin-orbit angles for the 13 transiting systems for which the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect has
been observed and modeled. The data are from Table 1 of Fabrycky & Winn (2009) and Madhusudhan & Winn (2008) as updated by
1/2
Winn et al. (2009), Narita et al. (2009) and this work. The size of the plot symbols scales as M
P , and the error bars show the measurement
uncertainties for both eccentricity and the spin-orbit angle. For the systems consistent with e = 0 the horizontal error bar gives the 95.4%
confidence upper limit on e, and for the other systems the horizontal error bars represent the 68.3% confidence uncertainties.
from NASA grant NNG05GK92G (to GWM), and AWH
gratefully acknowledges support from a Townes Postdoc-
toral Fellowship at the UC Berkeley Space Sciences Lab-
oratory. The authors wish to extend special thanks to
those of Hawaiian ancestry on whose sacred mountain of
Mauna Kea we are privileged to be guests. Without their
generous hospitality, the observations presented herein
would not have been possible.
Bakos, G. ´A., et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, 826
Barbieri, M., et al. 2007, A&A, 476, L13
Butler, R. P., et al. 1996, PASP, 108, 500
Chatterjee, S., Ford, E. B., Matsumura, S., & Rasio, F. A. 2008,
Madhusudhan, N. & Winn, J. N. 2008, arXiv:807.4570, 807
Mandel, K. & Agol, E. 2002, ApJ, 580, L171
Marcy, G., et al. 2005, Progress of Theoretical Physics
Supplement, 158, 24
REFERENCES
ApJ, 686, 580
Cochran, W. D., Redfield, S., Endl, M., & Cochran, A. L. 2008,
ApJ, 683, L59
Fabrycky, D. & Tremaine, S. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1298
Fabrycky, D. C. & Winn, J. N. 2009, arxiv:0902.0737
Fischer, D. A., et al. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1336
Ford, E. B. 2005, AJ, 129, 1706
Ford, E. B. & Rasio, F. A. 2008, ApJ, 686, 621
Gaudi, B. S. & Winn, J. N. 2007, ApJ, 655, 550
Gillon, M. 2009, ArXiv e-prints
Gregory, P. C. 2005, ApJ, 631, 1198
Howard, A. W., et al. 2009, arxiv:0901.4394
Howell, S. B., et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 1340
Johnson, J. A., Winn, J. N., Cabrera, N. E., & Carter, J. A. 2009,
ApJ, 692, L100
Joshi, Y. C., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 392, 1532
Juri´c, M. & Tremaine, S. 2008, ApJ, 686, 603
Lin, D. N. C., Bodenheimer, P., & Richardson, D. C. 1996,
Nature, 380, 606
Loeillet, B., et al. 2008, A&A, 481, 529
Lubow, S. H. & Ogilvie, G. I. 2001, ApJ, 560, 997
Marcy, G. W. & Butler, R. P. 1992, PASP, 104, 270
McLaughlin, D. B. 1924, ApJ, 60, 22
Moorhead, A. V. & Adams, F. C. 2008, Icarus, 193, 475
Narita, N., et al. 2009, ArXiv e-prints
Noguchi, K., et al. 2002, PASJ, 54, 855
Ohta, Y., Taruya, A., & Suto, Y. 2005, ApJ, 622, 1118
Pont, F., et al. 2009, ArXiv e-prints
Pont, F., Zucker, S., & Queloz, D. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 231
Queloz, D., et al. 2000, A&A, 359, L13
Rossiter, R. A. 1924, ApJ, 60, 15
Tegmark, M., et al. 2004, Phys. Rev. D, 69, 103501
Tonry, J., Burke, B. E., & Schechter, P. L. 1997, PASP, 109, 1154
Tonry, J. L., et al. 2005, PASP, 117, 281
Valenti, J. A. & Fischer, D. A. 2005, ApJS, 159, 141
Winn, J. N., et al. 2009, arxiv:0902.3461
Winn, J. N., et al. 2007, ApJ, 665, L167
Winn, J. N., et al. 2005, ApJ, 631, 1215
Wright, J. T., et al. 2009, ApJ, 693, 1084
Wu, Y., Murray, N. W., & Ramsahai, J. M. 2007, ApJ, 670, 820
Radial Velocity Measurements of WASP-14
TABLE 1
Heliocentric Julian Date (HJD)
RV
(m s−1)
Uncertainty Telescopea
(m s−1)
7
2454667.80421
2454672.81824
2454673.83349
2454999.76227
2454999.76665
2454999.77091
2454999.77517
2454999.77943
2454999.79290
2454999.79716
2454999.80142
2454999.80600
2454999.81026
2454999.81452
2454999.81878
2454999.82901
2454999.83327
2454999.84471
2454999.84898
2454999.85771
2454999.86197
2454999.86623
2454999.87049
2454999.87477
2454999.87904
2454999.88330
2454999.88757
2454999.89183
2454999.89610
2454999.90037
2454999.90464
2454999.90890
2454999.91317
2454999.92129
2454999.96315
2454999.96743
2454999.97170
2454999.98117
2454999.98891
2454999.99665
2455000.00825
2455000.01598
2455014.86287
2455015.91393
-139.4
-1008.4
955.3
151.6
138.8
133.6
112.0
110.2
97.9
89.8
67.8
65.8
54.3
49.0
34.6
4.9
-6.9
-38.3
-46.0
-70.3
-76.8
-92.5
-111.3
-114.5
-124.9
-131.0
-148.0
-161.0
-154.8
-175.6
-187.6
-190.4
-215.8
-228.0
-330.4
-331.1
-350.1
-372.5
-378.0
-398.5
-416.6
-429.6
965.8
-812.7
1.0
1.3
1.3
6.3
5.2
5.9
5.4
5.5
5.8
5.4
7.1
6.0
5.4
5.2
5.3
4.7
4.5
5.4
4.8
4.9
5.1
4.7
4.5
5.7
6.0
5.8
5.5
6.0
5.6
5.8
5.4
6.7
7.1
8.0
8.8
7.8
9.2
5.6
5.4
5.9
5.7
6.4
1.4
1.7
K
K
K
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
K
K
a K: HIRES, Keck I 10m telescope, Mauna Kea, Hawaii. S: HDS, Subaru
8m telescope, Mauna Kea, Hawaii.
Relative Photometry for WASP-14
TABLE 2
Heliocentric Julian Date (HJD) Relative Flux
2454963.85021
2454963.85113
2454963.85204
2454963.85296
2454963.85387
2454963.85478
2454963.85569
2454963.85660
...
1.00064
1.00127
1.00024
1.00086
1.00115
0.99986
1.00183
1.00005
...
Note. -- The full version of this table is avail-
able in the online edition, or by request to the au-
thors.
8
TABLE 3
System Parameters of WASP-14
Parameter
Value
Orbital Parameters
Orbital period, P [days]
Mid-transit time, Tt [HJD]
Velocity semiamplitude, K⋆ [m s−1]
Argument of pericenter, ω [degrees]
Orbital eccentricity, e
Velocity offset, γFIES [m s−1]
Velocity offset, γSOPHIE [m s−1]
Velocity offset, γHIRES [m s−1]
Velocity offset, γHDS [m s−1]
Spin-orbit Parameters
Projected spin-orbit angle λ [degrees]
Projected stellar rotation rate v sin i⋆ [km s−1]
2.2437704 ± 0.0000028
2454963.93676 ± 0.00025
989.9 ± 2.1
253.10 ± 0.80
0.0903 ± 0.0027
−4989.5 ± 3.4
−4990.1 ± 3.0
107.1 ± 2.1
7.7 ± 2.5
−33.1◦ ± 7.4◦
2.80 ± 0.57
|
1911.12745 | 1 | 1911 | 2019-11-28T15:12:38 | Machine learning inference of the interior structure of low-mass exoplanets | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | We explore the application of machine learning based on mixture density neural networks (MDNs) to the interior characterization of low-mass exoplanets up to 25 Earth masses constrained by mass, radius, and fluid Love number $k_2$. We create a dataset of 900$\:$000 synthetic planets, consisting of an iron-rich core, a silicate mantle, a high-pressure ice shell, and a gaseous H/He envelope, to train a MDN using planetary mass and radius as inputs to the network. For this layered structure, we show that the MDN is able to infer the distribution of possible thicknesses of each planetary layer from mass and radius of the planet. This approach obviates the time-consuming task of calculating such distributions with a dedicated set of forward models for each individual planet. While gas-rich planets may be characterized by compositional gradients rather than distinct layers, the method presented here can be easily extended to any interior structure model. The fluid Love number $k_2$ bears constraints on the mass distribution in the planets' interior and will be measured for an increasing number of exoplanets in the future. Adding $k_2$as an input to the MDN significantly decreases the degeneracy of the possible interior structures. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | Draft version December 2, 2019
Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63
9
1
0
2
v
o
N
8
2
.
]
P
E
h
p
-
o
r
t
s
a
[
1
v
5
4
7
2
1
.
1
1
9
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
Machine learning inference of the interior structure of low-mass exoplanets
Philipp Baumeister,1 Sebastiano Padovan,2 Nicola Tosi,1, 2 Grégoire Montavon,3 Nadine Nettelmann,2
Jasmine MacKenzie,1 and Mareike Godolt1
1Centre of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Technische Universität Berlin, Hardenbergstrasse 36, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
2Institute of Planetary Research, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Rutherfordstrasse 2, D-12489 Berlin, Germany
3Institute of Software Engineering and Theoretical Computer Science, Technische Universität Berlin, Marchstr. 23, D-10587 Berlin,
Germany
(Received August 30, 2019; Revised November 15, 2019; Accepted November 27, 2019)
Submitted to ApJ
Abstract
We explore the application of machine learning based on mixture density neural networks (MDNs)
to the interior characterization of low-mass exoplanets up to 25 Earth masses constrained by mass,
radius, and fluid Love number k2. We create a dataset of 900 000 synthetic planets, consisting of an
iron-rich core, a silicate mantle, a high-pressure ice shell, and a gaseous H/He envelope, to train a MDN
using planetary mass and radius as inputs to the network. For this layered structure, we show that
the MDN is able to infer the distribution of possible thicknesses of each planetary layer from mass and
radius of the planet. This approach obviates the time-consuming task of calculating such distributions
with a dedicated set of forward models for each individual planet. While gas-rich planets may be
characterized by compositional gradients rather than distinct layers, the method presented here can
be easily extended to any interior structure model. The fluid Love number k2 bears constraints on the
mass distribution in the planets' interior and will be measured for an increasing number of exoplanets
in the future. Adding k2 as an input to the MDN significantly decreases the degeneracy of the possible
interior structures. In an open repository we provide the trained MDN to be used through a Python
Notebook.
Keywords: planets and satellites: interiors -- planets and satellites: fundamental parameters -- methods:
numerical -- methods: machine learning -- methods: neural networks
1. INTRODUCTION
The characterization of the interior of observed exo-
planets is one of the main goals in current exoplanetary
science. With the large number of newly discovered exo-
planets expected in the next ten years by ground-based
surveys such as WASP (Pollacco et al. 2006), NGTS
(Wheatley et al. 2017), and HATNet/HATSouth (Hart-
man et al. 2004; Bakos et al. 2013) as well as the on-
going TESS space survey (Ricker et al. 2014) and the
upcoming PLATO mission (Rauer et al. 2014), a rapid
characterization scheme of the interior structure of these
planets will become increasingly necessary to further our
understanding of planetary populations. The vast ma-
Corresponding author: Philipp Baumeister
[email protected]
jority of the confirmed exoplanets has been identified
either through transits or radial velocities surveys. Plan-
ets identified with both techniques are characterized by
their mass and radius, which, combined, provide a first
indication of the bulk composition through comparison
with theoretical mass-radius curves (e.g., Valencia et al.
2006; Sotin et al. 2007; Zeng & Sasselov 2013). A com-
mon approach to the interior characterization of exo-
planets is the use of numerical models to compute in-
terior structures which comply with the measured mass
and radius of the planet (e.g., Sotin et al. 2007; Valen-
cia et al. 2007; Fortney et al. 2007; Wagner et al. 2011;
Zeng & Sasselov 2013; Unterborn & Panero 2019). As
this is an inverse problem, it requires the calculation of
a large number of interior models to obtain an overview
over possible interior structures (Rogers & Seager 2010a;
Dorn et al. 2017; Brugger et al. 2017).
If other ob-
2
P. Baumeister et al.
servables can be tested rapidly (although validating the
trained MDNs and optimizing the network architecture
may still take a considerable amount of time).
servables are used in addition to mass and radius, the
number of samples needed for an accurate inference of
possible interior structures increases drastically, due to
the increase in dimensionality (e.g., James et al. 2013).
Thus, the inference can quickly become computationally
expensive. Moreover, with only mass and radius, pos-
sible solutions tend to be highly degenerate, with mul-
tiple, qualitatively different interior compositions that
can match the observations equally well (e.g. Rogers &
Seager 2010a,b).
In this work, we explore a new approach to the inte-
rior characterization of exoplanets by employing a deep
learning neural network to treat this inverse problem.
In recent years, deep neural networks have been used in
a number of exoplanetary science studies, with applica-
tions ranging from the detections of planetary transits
(Pearson et al. 2018; Shallue & Vanderburg 2018; Chau-
shev et al. 2019) to atmospheric composition retrieval
from measured planet spectra (Zingales & Waldmann
2018; Márquez-Neila et al. 2018), and the computation
of critical core and envelope masses of forming planets
(Alibert & Venturini 2019). We approach the character-
ization of exoplanets by first creating a large dataset of
synthetic planets and then training a multitask (Caru-
ana 1997) mixture density network (MDN, Bishop 1994)
to infer plausible thicknesses of the planetary layers us-
ing observables like mass and radius. Mixture density
networks are a special case of neural networks, which
predict the parameters of a Gaussian mixture distribu-
tion instead of single output values, enabling us to ap-
proximate the entire posterior probability density func-
tion at once. This property allows them to work with
inverse problems that conventional neural networks of-
ten cannot address well. Neural networks are an optimal
choice to approach the interior characterization of plan-
ets: First, as neural networks can essentially approxi-
mate any arbitrary non-linear relations between some in-
put and output values (Cybenko 1989; Goodfellow et al.
2017; Lu et al. 2017), they are very well suited to model
the relation between observables and interior structure
for an arbitrary number of observable parameters, as
the mapping can be difficult to quantify, especially for a
large number of model parameters (Bishop 1995). Sec-
ondly, the computation time needed by a well-trained
neural network to make a prediction is in the order of
milliseconds. Compared to conventional methods, such
as Markov Chain Monte Carlo, this
significantly re-
duces the computational time for finding valid interior
structures, allowing for rapid classification of exoplan-
ets. Additionally, with the fast training times of neural
networks (less than 30 minutes with our setup, see end
of Section 2.2), the effect of different combinations of ob-
Beyond mass and radius, additional observables that
may be informative for the interior structure include
elemental abundances of the host star, which may be
representative of those of the planet (e.g., Dorn et al.
2015, 2017; Brugger et al. 2017), atmospheric composi-
tion (e.g., Madhusudhan et al. 2016), and the planetary
fluid Love numbers (Padovan et al. 2018). Of these, the
fluid Love numbers represent the most direct constraint
on the interior structure, given that they only depend
on the radial density distribution in the interior (Kramm
et al. 2011).
Fluid Love numbers are a subset of the more general
set of Love numbers, which are parameters describing
how a planet responds to a perturbation (e.g., tidal and
rotational deformations). They depend on the timescale
of the perturbation and on the rheological properties of
the interior (i.e., radial density profile, elastic proper-
ties, viscosity). For example, the rotational figure of the
Earth is relaxed, i.e., it attained hydrostatic equilibrium
and accordingly, its shape can be parameterized using
fluid Love numbers (Padovan et al. 2018). At the same
time, on the shorter tidal lunar and solar timescales, the
response is described by tidal Love numbers (e.g., Petit
& Luzum 2010).
The deformed shape of a transiting extrasolar planet
will modify its transit light-curve, introducing a second-
order effect which can in principle be observed (Akin-
sanmi et al. 2019; Hellard et al. 2019). Similarly, for
some particular configurations (e.g., a close-in planet
with a distant companion, Mardling 2007), absidal pre-
cession is mainly driven by the tidal interaction of the
planet with its host star (Batygin et al. 2009), and a
value of the Love number of the planet can be inferred
(Csizmadia et al. 2019). Thus, radial velocity measure-
ments as well as transit observations can be used, un-
der certain circumstances, to infer the value of the Love
number k2, a task that is currently possible only for
close-in gas giants. The ever-increasing temporal base-
line of exoplanets observations and sensitivity of ground-
based and space telescopes will make the measurement
of the Love numbers of extrasolar planets increasingly
possible. For example, using the new Echelle SPectro-
graph for Rocky Exoplanets and Stable Spectroscopic
Observations (ESPRESSO) mounted on the Very Large
Telescope facility of the European Souther Observatory
(Pepe et al. 2010), on a 10-year-long observing baseline,
one may infer the k2 of a body with a mass of 3 M⊕
(Sz. Csizmadia, personal communication). The advent
of larger telescopes such as the Thirty Meter Telescope
Machine learning inference of exoplanet interiors
3
(e.g., Skidmore et al. 2015) will further increase the sen-
sitivity for smaller planets. In the following, we assume
that measurements of the fluid Love numbers become
available in the future.
below 25 Earth-masses, as these show the greatest di-
versity in bulk density among the discovered exoplanets
(e.g., Lopez & Fortney 2014), hinting at a wide range of
interior structures.
2. METHODS
2.1. Interior structure model
We use a newly developed interior structure model
named TATOOINE (Tool for ATmospheres, Outgassing
and Optimal INteriors of Exoplanets) to construct the
planets used for the training data. A modelled planet
consists of four compositionally distinct layers: An iron-
rich core, a silicate mantle, an ice shell, and a H/He en-
velope. Each layer is characterized by its mass fraction,
with the sum of the mass of all layers constrained to add
up to the planet's total mass Mp.
The model calculates radial profiles of mass (m), den-
sity (ρ), and pressure (P ) by solving the following three
coupled equations:
dm(r)
dr
= 4πr2ρ(r),
dP (r)
dr
= − Gm(r)ρ(r)
r2
,
(1)
(2)
P (r) = f (ρ(r), T (r), c(r)).
(3)
Eq. (1) expresses the mass of a spherical shell of thick-
ness dr; Eq. (2) is the condition of hydrostatic equilib-
rium, where G is the gravitational constant; Eq. (3) is
an equation of state (EoS) where f indicates a function
that is specific to the material of each model layer and
depends on the density, temperature T (r), and compo-
sition c(r) profiles.
The model setup and parameters closely follow the
modelling approach of Sotin et al. (2007), with the addi-
tion of a zero-temperature H/He envelope to account for
gas-rich planets (Salpeter & Zapolsky 1967; Seager et al.
2007). Using a zero-temperature EoS implies that the
envelope thickness inferred from mass and radius of the
planet will tend to be too large (Section 2.1.4). Below
the H/He envelope, temperatures in the planet follow an
adiabatic profile starting with a temperature of 300 K
at the envelope-ice interface in all models. We further
assume that all planets share the same Earth-like min-
eral composition of the mantle and core. The interior
structure of gas-rich planets could be better described
by a compositional gradient rather than by chemically-
distinct layers, an approach that is best suited for pre-
dominantly rocky bodies. Nevertheless, the machine-
learning based inference approach that we present be-
low is general and can be easily adapted to any inte-
rior structure model (Section 2.2). We focus on planets
2.1.1. Iron-rich core
Density profiles derived from seismic data show that
the density of the Earth's core is about 5 -- 10% smaller
than the density of pure hcp-iron, suggesting the pres-
ence of lighter elements such as sulfur, oxygen, silicon,
carbon, and hydrogen (e.g. Rubie et al. 2015). We
chose an equation of state for the core where iron is
alloyed with sulphur, which is depleted in the Earth's
mantle compared to solar abundances (Murthy & Hall
1970; Poirier 1994). Several experimental studies sug-
gest that the melting temperature of the Fe-FeS alloy is
low enough to allow the Earth's outer core to be molten
under the probable thermodynamic conditions (e.g., Yoo
et al. 1993; Fei et al. 1997; Morard et al. 2008). We as-
sume our model planet to have a liquid core composed of
a Fe-FeS alloy with a molar fraction of 13% FeS (Poirier
1994; Sotin et al. 2007). For planets more massive than
Earth, Stixrude (2014) suggests that the iron cores of
planets in the entire Super-Earth mass range (up to 10
Earth masses) are at least partially liquid, and mantle
convection is vigourous enough to sustain a dynamo. We
neglect an inner solid core, as the total core radius is not
expected to be affected significantly since the density dif-
ference between the solid and liquid phase is small (Sotin
et al. 2007). The temperature- and pressure-dependent
density is calculated using a Mie-Grüneisen-Debye EoS
(e.g., Sotin et al. 2007; Fei et al. 2016).
2.1.2. Silicate mantle
The silicate mantle in our model is divided into an up-
per and a lower mantle, separated by a phase transition
at 23 GPa. The lower mantle is composed of bridg-
manite and magnesiowüstite. The upper mantle is com-
posed of olivine and ortho-pyroxene enstatite. The ra-
tio of mantle components is assumed to be Earth-like,
with a molar Mg/Si ratio of 1.131 (Sotin et al. 2007).
Additionally, all mantle silicates form a solid-state so-
lution of their respective Mg and Fe endmembers with
the ratio determined by the Mg number (Mg#), which
is defined as the mole fraction Mg/(Mg+Fe) of the man-
tle silicates. We use an Earth-like value of 0.9 for the
Mg# in all modeled planets. Density profiles are cal-
culated using a temperature-dependent 3rd order Birch-
Murnaghan EoS.
2.1.3. High pressure ice layer
Many exoplanets have intermediate bulk densities,
which may be indicative of large amounts of water in the
4
P. Baumeister et al.
interior (e.g., Léger et al. 2004; Adams et al. 2008; Barr
et al. 2018; Zeng et al. 2019). We allow for the presence
of water by using a layer of ice VII, which is the most
stable water ice high-pressure phase over a wide range
of pressures (Hemley et al. 1987). We neglect other wa-
ter phases, as the density differences between solid ice
phases are small (Hemley et al. 1987) and do not have
a major effect on the thickness of this layer. By do-
ing this, we neglect liquid and super-ionic phase effects,
which would lead to more degenerate solutions of inte-
rior structures (Nettelmann et al. 2011). Also, it must
be noted that higher temperatures in the ice shell may
significantly change the thickness of the layer (Thomas
& Madhusudhan 2016).
2.1.4. H/He gas envelope
Many massive (> 10 M⊕) exoplanets probably have
an extended primordial envelope consisting of hydrogen
and helium (e.g., Lopez & Fortney 2014). To model this
outer gaseous layer, we assume an envelope of solar-
like composition with 71% hydrogen and 29% helium
(by mass), and use a zero-temperature Thomas-Fermi-
Dirac EoS from Salpeter & Zapolsky (1967) to model the
pressure-dependent density. Using a zero-temperature
envelope overestimates the density of the gas mixture
compared to more sophisticated temperature-dependent
EoS. As a consequence, more of the planet needs to be
taken up by the envelope to account for the planet's
bulk density when modeling the interior. Especially for
planet models with extended atmospheres, this means
that, when inferring the thickness of the envelope from
mass and radius of the planet, the distribution of pos-
sible solutions is shifted towards higher envelope thick-
nesses. We define the planet's transit radius at a pres-
sure of 100 mbar.
2.2. Mixture density networks
Feedforward neural networks are a fundamental part
of machine learning algorithms. Their goal is to learn
the mapping between inputs x and corresponding out-
puts y (see e.g., Bishop 2006; Goodfellow et al. 2017). A
neural network consists of several layers of neurons. For
a conventional feedforward neural network, each layer
receives the outputs from the previous layer as input
and computes a new set of outputs. This calculation
is done by the neurons in the layer, where each neuron
receives input from other neurons of the previous layer
and computes an output value, using the so-called ac-
tivation function. These functions are typically nonlin-
ear, and thus enable the neural network to approximate
any arbitrary, non-linear function. The first layer in a
network receives data features as input and is therefore
called the input layer, and the final layer is called the
output layer because it outputs the predictions of the
network. All layers between input and output layer are
referred to as 'hidden'. Feedforward networks are so
named because information flows only in one direction
from the input layer through the hidden layers to the
output layer, without loops or feedback.
A neural network is trained with a set of training data
that provides examples of which output values corre-
spond to each set of input values. During training, these
data are passed through the network, where the weight-
ing of each neuron is iteratively adjusted so that the
predicted value approaches the actual target value. This
difference is measured by the so-called loss function. The
goal of training is to minimize the loss function. There-
fore, the gradient of the loss function at the current it-
eration is calculated by backpropagating the predicted
values through the network (Bishop 2006; Goodfellow
et al. 2017), and then using a gradient descent algorithm
to optimize the model weights.
The conventional approach in neural network train-
ing is to minimize the mean squared error between the
known values from the training data and the values pre-
dicted by the network, which results in these models
approximating the average of the training data, condi-
tioned on the input parameters. For forward problems,
where a set of input parameters maps to a single set of
output values, this approach usually yields the desired
solution. For inverse problems, where there may be mul-
tiple sets of output values for each feature, these models
are inadequate in many cases (Bishop 1994). Mixture
density networks (MDN) overcome this problem by com-
bining conventional neural networks with a probability
mixture model. While a conventional neural network
maps inputs to deterministic output variables, a MDN
predicts the full conditional probability distribution for
each input. We use a Gaussian mixture model for our
MDN, where the total distribution is the normalized
linear combination of weighted normal distributions, as
Gaussian mixtures can represent a wide range of data
distributions (Bishop 1994, 2006).
(4)
(5)
The probability density of the target data y (the ra-
dius fractions of each planetary layer), conditioned on
the input x (mass and radius, or mass, radius, and Love
number k2 of the planet), is represented by a linear com-
bination of Gaussian functions φi
(cid:0)y(cid:12)(cid:12) µi(x), σ2
i (x)(cid:1):
(cid:0)y(cid:12)(cid:12) µi(x), σ2
i (x)(cid:1) ,
p (y x) =
1 =
m(cid:88)
m(cid:88)
i=1
i=1
αi(x)φi
αi(x),
Machine learning inference of exoplanet interiors
5
where m is the number of mixture components (i.e., the
number of Gaussians), αi are the normalized mixture
weights, and µi and σ2
i are the means and variances of
the individual Gaussian distributions. As such, the out-
put layer of the MDN has 3 × m neurons: m neurons
respectively for the means, variances, and weights of the
Gaussian mixture, in each case with their specific acti-
vation function.
Our MDN is built from a feedforward neural network
with 3 hidden layers having 512 nodes each. For the
output layer, we employ a multitask learning approach
(Caruana 1997), where the output layer consists of four
seperate MDN layers sharing the same hidden layer (see
Figure 1). The MDN layers, corresponding to the radius
fractions of the four (planetary) layers to be predicted,
are built as specified above using m = 20 mixture com-
ponents each. We found this setup to be among the
best performing MDN architectures by carrying out a
grid search of the hyperparameters of the MDN model,
i.e., the amount of hidden layers, the amount of neurons
per layer, as well as the learning rate of the optimizer
(see below).
The hidden layers are activated with a Rectified Linear
Unit (ReLU) function (Nair & Hinton 2010; Goodfellow
et al. 2017):
ReLU(x) = max(0, x).
(6)
The ReLU is a commonly used non-linear activation
function. Because of their close similarity to linear func-
tions, they are easy to optimize and retain many of the
advantages of linear models (Goodfellow et al. 2017).
The MDN layer uses a softmax activation for the αi
nodes, which ensures that the outputs of those nodes are
between zero and one and add up to one. The µi and
i output nodes are activated with a non-negative ex-
σ2
ponential linear unit (NNELU) to ensure that predicted
means and variances are always positive (Brando 2017).
The NNELU is a regular ELU (Clevert et al. 2015) with
an additional offset of +1 to keep it positive:
NNELU(x) = 1+ELU(x) = 1+
exp(x) − 1 x < 0 .
(7)
We choose the loss function of every output layer to
be the average negative log-likelihood
x ≥ 0
x
(cid:88)
(x,y) ∈ D
L(Θ) = − 1
N
log p (y x) ,
(8)
between predictions and input values, where N is the
size of the training dataset D and Θ represents the
model parameters. The model is trained by minimiz-
ing the sum of the four individual output losses. Min-
imization of the loss function is done using the Adam
optimizer (Kingma & Ba 2014) with a learning rate of
0.001. The learning rate defines how much the weights
are updated when performing the gradient descent.
We include a dropout layer after each ReLU layer with
a dropout rate of 0.5 (Srivastava et al. 2014). At each
training iteration, a dropout layer randomly disables a
number of neurons specified by the dropout rate (in
our case half of the neurons) in the subsequent layer.
Dropout is a common technique to prevent a neural net-
work from overfitting the training data, because the net-
work will be less sensitive to the weights of individual
neurons. This forces neurons to be able to perform well
regardless of other neurons in the network, which in-
creases the network's ability to generalize and improves
the general robustness of the model. To further help
against overfitting, we apply early stopping (Prechelt
2012) and stop training once the loss from the valida-
tion data does not improve for 15 consecutive training
epochs.
The MDN is trained on a NVIDIA Quadro P5000
graphics card using the Keras library (Chollet et al.
2015), running on top of the TensorFlow library (Abadi
et al. 2015). The code for the MDN layers is adapted
from Martin & Duhaime (2019).
2.3. Training set
We employ our interior structure code to construct
each planet model of our training dataset. We use a
Monte Carlo sampling approach to create a dataset of
about N = 900 000 unique planet models with random
interior structures. For each synthetic planet, the planet
mass is set to a random value between 0.01 and 25 Earth
masses on a logarithmic scale. The mass fractions of the
core, ice, and gas layer are also set to a random value,
with the mantle layer taking up the remaining mass. We
sample core and ice layers linearly, while the gas mass
fraction is sampled logarithmically between 10−5 and 1.
A new random draw is performed if the mass fractions
add up to more than 1. In Section 3.5 we discuss our
choice of sampling distribution. From planet mass and
mass fractions, the planet interior structure and planet
radius are calculated. In addition, we calculate the fluid
Love number k2 for each planet following the matrix
propagator approach of Padovan et al. (2018). We train
the neural network with 70% of the dataset and validate
the model results with the remaining 30%. We test two
input scenarios: mass and radius only (case 1); mass,
radius, and k2 (case 2).
6
P. Baumeister et al.
Figure 1. Schematic of the mixture density network architecture used in this work. A large training set of synthetic planets
is used to train a MDN with 3 hidden layers of 512 nodes each. For each interior layer, the MDN outputs the parameters of
a linear combination of Gaussians (mean, standard deviation, and weight of each Gaussian) to fit the distribution of planet
interior structures constrained by the input parameters (mass, radius, fluid Love number k2).
3. RESULTS
3.1. Validation with baseline models
We establish a baseline model to evaluate the training
performance of the MDN. We use a deep neural network
(DNN) with the same parameters and training routine
as the MDN, with the exception that the output layer
consists of four nodes relating to the radius fraction of
the four planet layers. This layer is additionally acti-
vated with a softmax activation function (Goodfellow
et al. 2017) to ensure that all output values add up to
one, introducing an additional constraint. This DNN is
in effect a MDN with only one mixture component. We
also define a null-model that always predicts the mean
and standard deviation of layer thicknesses in the train-
ing data, thus representing the average interior structure
in the data set. The null-model defines the minimum
requirements a model must fulfill, in that the thickness
of each planet layer must be predicted better than the
global average of the training data. A model performing
equal or worse than the null-model is basically guess-
ing random values. For an indicator of the goodness of
the training of the model, we compare the negative log-
likelihood (NLL, Eq. (8)) of all three models as shown in
Figure 2. The three models on the left were trained on
mass and radius only (case 1), the three models on the
right were trained with mass, radius, and k2 (case 2).
Lower values (corresponding to darker shades of blue)
indicate a better performance of the respective models.
Both the DNN and MDN perform better than the null-
model for all planetary interior layers. The MDN shows
significant improvement for all interior layer predictions
compared to the DNN due to its ability to accommodate
multiple interior solutions for one mass and radius input.
Figure 2. Comparison of the negative log-likelihood L(Θ)
(NLL) of the MDN and validation models for mass and radius
inputs only (left panel) and mass, radius, and k2 inputs (right
panel). Lower values (darker shades of blue) correspond to
a better approximation of the validation data by the model.
Figure 3. Dependence of the NLL on the size of the training
set for the MDN using only mass and radius inputs (blue
dots), and for the MDN using mass, radius, and k2 (red
dots). For each training set size, we changed the random
seed to generate a different set of training samples.
Machine learning inference of exoplanet interiors
7
In Figure 3 we demonstrate the dependence of the
NLL loss on the size of the training data set. For each
training size, we changed the random seed to sample a
different set of training data. For both case 1 and case 2,
the loss improves with increasing sample numbers, and
the spread of loss values is reduced. The NLL flattens
for higher sample numbers. We conclude that a training
set size of N ≈ 105 is sufficient to ensure a good fit
of the MDN. Case 2, using mass, radius, and k2, needs
more training samples than case 1, due to the increased
number of observables.
3.2. MDN accuracy and degeneracies
The ability of the network to constrain the interior
structure of each planet based on given input parame-
ters is displayed in Figure 4, which shows the distribu-
tions predicted by the MDN from the validation data set
of each interior layer plotted against the actual relative
thickness of the layer. A MDN model that perfectly pre-
dicts the actual data set would plot along the diagonal.
With only mass and radius as inputs, the MDN can
infer the relative thickness of the gaseous envelope well.
This result is similar to the findings of Lopez & Fort-
ney (2014), who showed that the planetary radius can
be used as a first-order proxy for the mass of the H/He
envelope. Likewise, the iron-rich core is relatively well
constrained. For model planets with large cores, the pre-
dictions are quite accurate, as the high density of these
planets does not allow for much variation in possible in-
terior structures, given that we do not allow for planets
denser than a naked core. The same applies to planets
with thick gas envelopes, as there is nothing less dense
than the gas. The MDN tends to overestimate the core
thickness when the core is small. The reason for this
behaviour lies in the nature of the mass-radius diagram:
For planets with small cores, a slight increase of the core
mass leads to a larger relative increase in core size than
for planets with massive cores, leading to a higher de-
generacy of the interior structures. As such, very small
core sizes are undersampled in the training data set (see
also Figure 7). This makes the core size of small core
planets more difficult for the MDN to predict. Similarly,
the thickness of large layers tends to be underestimated
due to less training samples available.
The high-pressure ice layer thicknesses are constrained
relatively well for the most part, but the MDN tends
to underestimate the thickness of the ice layer in some
parts of the dataset. The silicate mantle is barely con-
strained. The MDN mostly predicts a broad distribu-
tion with constant mean values, but performs slightly
better for planets with small mantles. This is not an
unexpected result, as it is a consequence of the inherent
degeneracy in the mantle and ice layer thickness due to
both layers having intermediate densities in comparison
with other layers in the planet. As such, their masses
and radii can easily be compensated by those other lay-
ers. Figure 4 shows that the thickness of mantle and ice
layers is barely constrainable for most planets.
The inclusion of k2 dramatically improves the perfor-
mance of the MDN, which now adequately predicts the
correct thickness of each interior layer (right panels of
Figure 4). The biggest improvement is in the prediction
of the mantle layer. However, the mantle remains the
least well predicted layer as already shown by the scores
of Figure 2. The MDN still tends to overestimate the
thickness of the core, mantle and ice layer when these
layers are thin due to undersampling in the training data
set. The previous underestimation of the ice layer is no
longer observed. The gas layer thickness is predicted
with a high accuracy, even for thin layers. All in all,
the inclusion of k2, by providing a measure of the de-
gree of mass concentration in the interior, significantly
constrains the solution space and helps reduce the de-
generacy of interior solutions.
3.3. Application to Solar System and extrasolar planets
We investigate the predicted interior structures for
four representative planets.
In the Solar System, we
consider the Earth, being the archetypical terrestrial
planet, and Neptune as a gas and ice-rich planet at the
upper end of our mass range (with a mass of 17.1 M⊕
and a radius of 3.865 R⊕). For exoplanets, we investi-
gate Kepler-10 b (3.72 M⊕, 1.47 R⊕, Weiss et al. 2016),
which with its high density is a likely Super-Earth (Va-
lencia 2010; Batalha et al. 2011; Wagner et al. 2012), and
GJ 1214 b (Charbonneau et al. 2009; Rogers & Seager
2010b; Nettelmann et al. 2011), a well-studied, relatively
low-density planet (6.26 M⊕, 2.85 R⊕, Harpsøe et al.
2013), likely with a volatile-rich interior and extended
gas envelope.
Figure 5 shows the distributions of predicted solutions
of the MDN for each interior layer for the four planets
using mass and radius only as inputs for the network.
The histograms behind each prediction curves show all
interior solutions within a 5% margin of mass and radius,
assuming a uniform error distribution where every input
parameter is equally likely. To obtain these samples, we
modeled an independent data set by Monte Carlo sam-
pling from the same prior distribution of mass fractions
that was used to create the training data set. Addition-
ally, the bars on top of each plot show the spread of
possible solutions obtained from this Monte Carlo sam-
pling, where the color shade shows all samples within
the 1%, 2%, and 5% error margins in input parameters
8
P. Baumeister et al.
Figure 4. Predicted distributions of the thickness of core, mantle, ice, and gas envelope layers as a function of actual values
from the validation data set. The dashed diagonal line indicates a perfect prediction of the layer thickness. The four panels on
the left show predictions for a MDN trained on mass and radius inputs only. The four panels on the right show the predicted
distributions for a MDN trained additionally with the fluid Love number k2. The predicted distributions are coloured according
to the local probability density.
(from darkest to lightest). The relative error δ of each
Monte Carlo sample is calculated as the Euclidean dis-
tance from the input parameters:
(cid:115)(cid:18) ∆M
(cid:19)2
M
δ =
(cid:18) ∆R
(cid:19)2
+
R
,
(9)
where M and R are the true mass and radius values, and
∆M and ∆R the absolute errors between the Monte
Carlo sample and true value. The comparison of the
MDN predictions (solid lines) and the Monte Carlo dis-
tributions (histograms) in Figure 5 show that the MDN
accurately replicates the distributions of possible inte-
rior solutions for all planets.
In the case of the Kepler-10b, the predicted core size is
consistent with values from other studies (e.g., Wagner
et al. 2012), showing it to be most likely a terrestrial type
planet.
In contrast, the predicted distributions of GJ
1214b are more similar to Neptune's interior. This com-
pares well with the study of Nettelmann et al. (2011),
who conclude that the interior of GJ 1214b is consistent
with having a large gaseous, water-enriched envelope.
Other possible interior structures in their study include
the planet being mostly rocky with a large H/He enve-
lope taking up 40% of the planet's radius.
For the Earth, the dashed lines in Figure 5 indicate
the actual core and mantle thickness as known from the
Preliminary Reference Earth Model (Dziewonski & An-
derson 1981). These do not align with the peaks of the
predicted MDN distributions, which reproduce the cor-
rect values only near their tails (Figure 5). This is a
result of the large degeneracy in interior solutions. A
planet like the Earth, consisting of iron core and silicate
mantle only, is only one solution (in terms of possible so-
lutions of the interior structure) compared to a generic
planet having ice and gas layers. The situation would
partly improve with additional constraints on the planet,
such as transmission spectra or detailed escape model-
ing ruling out the presence of a substantial atmosphere
(e.g., Owen & Wu 2017; Dorn & Heng 2018; Kubyshkina
et al. 2018).
3.4. Influence of k2 on the predictability of the interior
structure
As shown in Figure 4, adding the fluid Love number k2
as a third observable helps to significantly constrain the
interior structure of the planets. Figure 6 (left) shows
the predictions of the neural network including the fluid
Love number k2 for the Earth (with k2 = 0.933 from
Lambeck 1980). For Neptune (right), the actual value
of k2 is 0.392 calculated from the first order of the expan-
sion of the gravitational moment J2 = 3.40843 × 10−3
(Jacobson 2009), using the volumetric mean radius of
24.622× 106 m and a Voyager rotation period of 16.11 h
Machine learning inference of exoplanet interiors
9
Figure 5. MDN predictions of the relative interior layer thickness for four representative planet cases using only mass and
radius as inputs to the network. The colored lines show the combined Gaussian mixture prediction of the MDN. The area under
each curve is normalized to one. The histograms show possible interior solutions within 5% of the input values obtained from
an independent Monte Carlo sampling (see main text for more details). The colored bars in the upper plots represent the space
of solutions of valid interior structures obtained from the same Monte Carlo sampling. The shade of each bar corresponds to an
uncertainty of 1%, 2%, and 5% in the observable parameters (from darkest to lightest, respectively). The vertical dashed lines
in the Earth plot show the actual thickness of Earth's core and mantle from PREM (Dziewonski & Anderson 1981). Data for
Kepler-10b from Weiss et al. (2016). Data for GJ 1214b from Harpsøe et al. (2013).
Figure 6. MDN predictions of the relative interior layer thickness for the Earth (left) and a Neptune-like planet with k2 = 0.3
(right) as shown in Figure 5, but using mass, radius, and the fluid Love number k2 as inputs to the network.
(Hubbard 1984). In this work, however, the assumption
of the zero-temperature EoS for the gaseous envelope
puts the real mass, radius, and k2 triplet of Neptune
outside of our sampled parameter space, preventing us
from reaching the actual value of k2. As mentioned in
Section 2.1.4, our model overestimates the thickness of
10
P. Baumeister et al.
the gas envelope when constraining the planet's interior
to mass and radius. As a result, planets with significant
gas fractions are more centrally condensed in our model,
resulting in low values of k2. For a planet with Neptune
mass of 17.1 M⊕ and radius of 3.865 R⊕, possible val-
ues of k2 lie between 0.2 and 0.325 with our model. As
such, we chose to use a value of k2 = 0.3, which allows
the interior model to return a good spread of solutions
while still being close to the actual value. We call this
planet Neptune-like, noting that a more sophisticated,
temperature-dependent EoS of the gas envelope would
be needed to model Neptune in better detail and with
the correct k2.
In both cases, the inclusion of k2 significantly shrinks
the solution space. For the Earth, the interior struc-
ture of the Earth is constrained well to the actual val-
ues. In the case of the Neptune-like planet, the MDN
predictions clearly indicate this planet to be an ice-rich
planet with an extended gas envelope and a small iron-
silicate core. The predictions are also consistent with
the planet having no iron-silicate core at all. The gas-
envelope thickness, assuming a Love number of 0.3, can
be well constrained by the MDN.
Compared to the 3-layer interior structures models of
Neptune by Podolak et al. (1995) and more recent ones
by Nettelmann et al. (2013), which show that Neptune's
ice-enriched gaseous envelope makes up 10 -- 30% of the
planet's radius, the MDN overestimates the thickness
of the gas envelope to be 30 -- 60% of the planet's radius
when considering mass and radius only (Figure 5), and
30 -- 44% of the planet's radius when considering mass,
radius, and k2 (Figure 6). There are several reasons for
this finding. For one, we use a basic H/He atmosphere
with no temperature-dependence of the envelope, and a
pure water ice layer underneath. Compared to interior
density profiles of Nettelmann et al. (2013), we over-
estimate the density of the ice layer by ≈ 25% in the
lower parts of the planet. This is a result of our choice
of a high-pressure EoS neglecting ionic and super-ionic
water phases. As a result the gas envelope needs to be
larger to arrive at the same mass and radius, compen-
sating the denser interior (see section 2.1.4). Compared
to more recent studies, the zero-temperature EoS that
we use overestimates the density especially in the upper
part of the atmosphere. The combination of these two
factors causes the envelope to be comparatively larger
than currently believed. In turn, this also leads to our
planet models being more centrally condensed, so that
k2 tends to be underestimated in all models with ex-
tended atmospheres.
Additionally, our interior model assumes strictly im-
miscible layers. Some layer phases, such as H2 and H2O,
can actually be miscible under pressure and temperature
conditions in gas giants. As such, the layered interior
model can not fully account for the interior of Neptune
(see also Podolak et al. 1995).
The Neptune-like predictions of the MDN are however
fully consistent with the Monte Carlo sampling results.
As such, deviations from the actual interior structure
are only due to simplifications in the interior model, re-
flected in the training data. Therefore, we expect that
using a more appropriate atmosphere and an improved
ice model will help us to improve the accuracy of our
predictions.
3.5. Influence of prior distribution
Since the MDN predicts the posterior distribution of
possible planetary structures solely from the data it was
given during training, the distribution of training data
points can be a main source of prediction errors. In Fig-
ure 7, we show the effect of a different prior choice on
the predicted interior structures of Earth and Neptune.
Solid lines represent the baseline prior distributions in
mass (blue) and radius (red), where mass sampling is
linear except than for the gaseous envelope, where it is
logarithmic. The dashed lines are the priors obtained
assuming a linear mass sampling in each layer. This
drastically reduces the amount of planets with a small
envelope (red lines), shifting focus to planets with more
extended envelopes. This slightly changes the priors of
the other layers as well.
The bottom plots in Figure 7 show a comparison of the
predictions of a MDN trained with this new resampled
data set with the predictions of the original MDN. For
the Earth case, the greatest difference lies in the predic-
tion of the envelope thickness. Here, the MDN tends to
predict a preferentially thicker envelope. This is due to
the new prior giving less priority to very small envelopes.
As such, there are less training samples available for
small envelopes. As a result of the changed envelope pre-
diction, the predictions of the other layers also change
slightly. Mantle and ice predictions shift to slightly lower
thicknesses, the core shifts to slightly larger thicknesses.
However, the predicted interior structures still lie in a
similar range, only the shape of the curves are different.
For Neptune, there is very little difference between pre-
dictions for the new and old priors, since planets with
larger envelope fractions are equally well sampled with
both prior distributions. We conclude that the exact
shape of the prior distributions is not too important as
long as there are enough samples in each region of the
solution space.
Machine learning inference of exoplanet interiors
11
Figure 7. Top plots: Cumulative density function (CDF) of the training data set for layer mass fractions (blue) and layer
radius fractions (red). Solid lines represent the distribution of the full training set with a logarithmic sampling of the envelope
mass fractions. For the dashed lines, the dataset was resampled so that the distribution of gas mass fractions approximates the
distribution of the other layers' mass fractions (with linear sampling). Bottom plots: Comparison of predictions for both prior
distributions for Earth and Neptune (using mass and radius as network inputs).
4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
We show that mixture density networks (MDNs, Fig-
ure 1) can accurately predict the space of interior so-
lutions of planets with mass below 25 Earth masses
(Figure 5). There are two main advantages in this
machine-learning-based approach compared to conven-
tional methods (e.g., Monte Carlo sampling): First, pre-
dicting the distribution of possible interior structures
of a planet with a trained MDN only takes few mil-
liseconds on a normal desktop CPU (we used an AMD
EPYC 7351) compared to potentially several hours if
the parameter space needs to be sampled with a for-
ward model. Thus, trained MDNs can be used to pro-
vide a rapid first characterization of the space of ad-
missible interior structures of observed planets. These
can be then investigated with more sophisticated models
that account for additional observables relevant to spe-
cific planets such as stellar irradiation, planet age, and
atmospheric composition. Secondly, the trained MDN
represents a stand-alone tool: While its predictions rely
on the assumptions of the underlying interior model, the
interior model itself as well as the training data set are
not needed to operate the MDN. This renders MDNs
a valuable tool for the exoplanetary science community
because a fully trained MDN can be used to obtain an in-
dication of possible interior structures without the need
of a dedicated code for solving the forward problem. The
file size of our MDN is ≈ 7.5 MB, making its dissemi-
nation easy. Our trained MDN models are available on
GitHub1.
The generation of a data set of forward models of ap-
propriate size can be computationally expensive, espe-
cially if a complex interior model is used or if additional
observables are considered (Figure 3). Conversely, the
training of the network itself only takes a few minutes,
and can be significantly sped up by utilizing GPU ac-
celeration (Shi et al. 2016). Therefore, several MDNs
corresponding to different combinations of input param-
eters (i.e., observables) can be efficiently tested, making
it possible to quickly identify combinations of parame-
ters that better characterize the interior of a planet.
Similar to other inference methods, the predicted dis-
tributions depend to some extent on the choice of the
prior distributions (see, e.g., Dorn et al. 2017). With
better informed priors constrained by observations and
1 https://github.com/philippbaumeister/MDN_exoplanets
12
P. Baumeister et al.
physical considerations, the predictions will be more ac-
curate. The MDN approach presented here reproduces
the well-known degeneracy of interior structures based
on mass-radius pairs only (Figures 4 and 5). Using k2
as an additional input significantly reduces the set of
possible interior structures (Figures 4 and 6).
In the solar system there are only few planetary ob-
jects, each characterized by several remote and in-situ
observations that provide a relatively accurate picture
of their formation, history, and interior structure. The
problem of understanding exoplanets is complementary,
in that thousands of objects are known, each charac-
terized by a severely limited number of observations.
MDNs provide a fast alternative to other, often time-
consuming, inference methods, allowing an efficient ap-
proach to exploiting exoplanetary data, which span a pa-
rameter space much wider than that of the planets of the
solar system. As new type of data will become available
with the advent of new observing facilities (e.g., atmo-
spheric compositions from JWST), models more com-
plex that those presented here, and larger data sets of
forward models to train appropriate MDNs will be re-
quired. These are modifications that only depend on the
available computing power, and can be readily incorpo-
rated in the method presented here as the need arises.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank an anonymous reviewer for insightful com-
ments that helped improve the paper. We describe con-
tributions to the paper using the taxonomy of Brand
et al. (2015). For each entry, the first name is lead,
the following are contributing. Conceptualization: S.P.,
N.T.; Methodology: P.B., S.P., N.T., G.M., M.G.; Soft-
ware: P.B., S.P.; Investigation: P.B.; Writing -- Original
Draft: P.B., S.P., N.T.; Writing -- Review & Editing:
P.B., S.P., N.T., G.M., N.N., J.M., M.G.; Visualization:
P.B.; Supervision: N.T., S.P., M.G.; Funding Acquisi-
tion: N.T., M.G.
The authors acknowledge the support of the DFG Prior-
ity Program SPP 1992 "Exploring the Diversity of Ex-
trasolar Planets" (TO 704/3-1, GO 2610/2-1) and the
DFG Research Unit FOR 2440 "Matter under planetary
interior conditions". N.T. also acknowledges support by
the Helmholtz Association (VH-NG-1017), and M.G. by
the DFG (GO 2610/1-1).
REFERENCES
Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., et al. 2015.
https://www.tensorflow.org/
Adams, E. R., Seager, S., & Elkins-Tanton, L. 2008, The
Astrophysical Journal, 673, 1160, doi: 10.1086/524925
Akinsanmi, B., Barros, S. C. C., Santos, N. C., et al. 2019,
Astronomy & Astrophysics, 621, A117,
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834215
Alibert, Y., & Venturini, J. 2019, Astronomy &
Astrophysics, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834942
Bakos, G. Á., Csubry, Z., Penev, K., et al. 2013,
Publications of the ASP, 125, 154, doi: 10.1086/669529
Barr, A. C., Dobos, V., & Kiss, L. L. 2018, Astronomy &
Astrophysics, 613, A37
Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2011,
The Astrophysical Journal, 729, 27,
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/729/1/27
Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J.
2015, Learned Publishing, 28, 151, doi: 10.1087/20150211
Brando, A. 2017, Master's thesis
Brugger, B., Mousis, O., Deleuil, M., & Deschamps, F.
2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 850, 93,
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa965a
Caruana, R. 1997, Machine Learning, 28, 41,
doi: 10.1023/A:1007379606734
Charbonneau, D., Berta, Z. K., Irwin, J., et al. 2009,
Nature, 462, 891, doi: 10.1038/nature08679
Chaushev, A., Raynard, L., Goad, M. R., et al. 2019,
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 488,
5232, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2058
Chollet, F., et al. 2015, Keras. https://keras.io
Clevert, D.-A., Unterthiner, T., & Hochreiter, S. 2015,
arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1511.07289
Batygin, K., Bodenheimer, P., & Laughlin, G. 2009,
Csizmadia, S., Hellard, H., & Smith, A. M. S. 2019,
Astrophys. J. Lett., 704, L49
Bishop, C. M. 1994, Mixture density networks, Tech. rep.
-- . 1995, Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition (New
Astronomy & Astrophysics, 623, A45,
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834376
Cybenko, G. 1989, Mathematics of Control, Signals and
York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, Inc.)
Systems, 2, 303, doi: 10.1007/BF02551274
-- . 2006, Pattern recognition and machine learning,
Dorn, C., & Heng, K. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal,
Information science and statistics (New York: Springer)
853, 64, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9c80
Machine learning inference of exoplanet interiors
13
Dorn, C., Khan, A., Heng, K., et al. 2015, Astronomy &
Léger, A., Selsis, F., Sotin, C., et al. 2004, Icarus, 169, 499,
Astrophysics, 577, A83,
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424915
Dorn, C., Venturini, J., Khan, A., et al. 2017, Astronomy &
Astrophysics, 597, A37,
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628708
Dziewonski, A. M., & Anderson, D. L. 1981, Physics of the
Earth and Planetary Interiors, 25, 297 ,
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(81)90046-7
doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2004.01.001
Madhusudhan, N., Agúndez, M., Moses, J. I., & Hu, Y.
2016, SSRv, 205, 285, doi: 10.1007/s11214-016-0254-3
Mardling, R. A. 2007, Monthly Notices of the Royal
Astronomical Society, 382, 1768,
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12500.x
Martin, C., & Duhaime, D. 2019,
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.2578015
Fei, Y., Bertka, C. M., & Finger, L. W. 1997, Science, 275,
Morard, G., Andrault, D., Guignot, N., et al. 2008, Earth
1621, doi: 10.1126/science.275.5306.1621
Fei, Y., Murphy, C., Shibazaki, Y., Shahar, A., & Huang,
H. 2016, Geophysical Research Letters, 43, 6837,
doi: 10.1002/2016GL069456
Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., & Barnes, J. W. 2007, The
Astrophysical Journal, 659, 1661, doi: 10.1086/512120
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. 2017, Deep
learning (Cambridge (EE.UU.); London: MIT Press)
Harpsøe, K. B. W., Hardis, S., Hinse, T. C., et al. 2013,
Astronomy & Astrophysics, 549, A10,
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219996
Hartman, J. D., Bakos, G., Stanek, K. Z., & Noyes, R. W.
2004, 128, 1761, doi: 10.1086/423920
Hellard, H., Csizmadia, S., Padovan, S., et al. 2019,
Astrophys. J. https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.03171
Hemley, R. J., Jephcoat, A. P., Mao, H. K., et al. 1987, 4
Hubbard, W. B. 1984, Planetary interiors
Jacobson, R. A. 2009, The Astronomical Journal, 137,
4322, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/137/5/4322
and Planetary Science Letters, 272, 620,
doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.05.028
Murthy, V. R., & Hall, H. 1970, Physics of the Earth and
Planetary Interiors, 2, 276,
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(70)90014-2
Márquez-Neila, P., Fisher, C., Sznitman, R., & Heng, K.
2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 719,
doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0504-2
Nair, V., & Hinton, G. E. 2010, in Proceedings of the 27th
International Conference on International Conference on
Machine Learning, ICML'10 (Omnipress), 807 -- 814.
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3104322.3104425
Nettelmann, N., Fortney, J. J., Kramm, U., & Redmer, R.
2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 733, 2,
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/733/1/2
Nettelmann, N., Helled, R., Fortney, J. J., & Redmer, R.
2013, Planetary and Space Science, 77, 143,
doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2012.06.019
Owen, J. E., & Wu, Y. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal,
James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. 2013,
847, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa890a
Springer Texts in Statistics, Vol. 103, An Introduction to
Statistical Learning (New York, NY: Springer New
York), doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. 2014, arXiv:1412.6980 [cs].
http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980
Kramm, U., Nettelmann, N., Redmer, R., & Stevenson,
D. J. 2011, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 528, A18,
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015803
Kubyshkina, D., Fossati, L., Erkaev, N. V., et al. 2018,
Astronomy & Astrophysics, 619, A151,
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833737
Lambeck, K. 1980, The Earth's Variable Rotation:
Geophysical Causes and Consequences, Cambridge
Monographs on Mechanics (Cambridge University Press),
doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511569579
Lopez, E. D., & Fortney, J. J. 2014, The Astrophysical
Journal, 792, 1, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/1
Lu, Z., Pu, H., Wang, F., Hu, Z., & Wang, L. 2017, arXiv
e-prints, arXiv:1709.02540
Padovan, S., Spohn, T., Baumeister, P., et al. 2018,
Astronomy & Astrophysics,
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834181
Pearson, K. A., Palafox, L., & Griffith, C. A. 2018,
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 474,
478, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2761
Pepe, F. A., Cristiani, S., Rebolo Lopez, R., et al. 2010, in
Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
(SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7735, Proceed. of SPIE,
77350F, doi: 10.1117/12.857122
Petit, G., & Luzum, B. 2010, IERS Conventions (2010),
Tech. rep., Frankfurt am Main: Verlag des Bundesamts
für Kartographie und Geodäsie
Podolak, M., Weizman, A., & Marley, M. 1995, Planetary
and Space Science, 43, 1517,
doi: 10.1016/0032-0633(95)00061-5
Poirier, J.-P. 1994, Physics of the Earth and Planetary
Interiors, 85, 319,
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(94)90120-1
14
P. Baumeister et al.
Pollacco, D. L., Skillen, I., Collier Cameron, A., et al. 2006,
Stixrude, L. 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
118, 1407, doi: 10.1086/508556
Prechelt, L. 2012, in Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade:
Second Edition, ed. G. Montavon, G. B. Orr, & K.-R.
Müller (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg),
53 -- 67, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-35289-8_5
Rauer, H., Catala, C., Aerts, C., et al. 2014, Experimental
Astronomy, 38, 249, doi: 10.1007/s10686-014-9383-4
Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al. 2014,
Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and
Systems, 1, 014003, doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003
Rogers, L. A., & Seager, S. 2010a, The Astrophysical
Journal, 712, 974, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/974
-- . 2010b, The Astrophysical Journal, 716, 1208,
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/716/2/1208
Rubie, D. C., Nimmo, F., & Melosh, H. J. 2015, in Treatise
on Geophysics, ed. G. Schubert (Elsevier), 43 -- 79
Salpeter, E. E., & Zapolsky, H. S. 1967, Physical Review,
158, 876, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.158.876
Seager, S., Kuchner, M., Hier-Majumder, C., & Militzer, B.
2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 669, 1279,
doi: 10.1086/521346
Shallue, C. J., & Vanderburg, A. 2018, The Astronomical
Journal, 155, 94, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa9e09
Shi, S., Wang, Q., Xu, P., & Chu, X. 2016,
arXiv:1608.07249 [cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.07249
Skidmore, W., TMT International Science Development
Teams, & Science Advisory Committee, T. 2015, Res.
Ast. Astrophys., 15, 1945,
doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/15/12/001
Sotin, C., Grasset, O., & Mocquet, A. 2007, Icarus, 191,
337, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2007.04.006
Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., &
Salakhutdinov, R. 2014, Journal of Machine Learning
Research, 15, 1929.
http://jmlr.org/papers/v15/srivastava14a.html
Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering
Sciences, 372, 20130076, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2013.0076
Thomas, S. W., & Madhusudhan, N. 2016, Monthly Notices
of the Royal Astronomical Society, 458, 1330,
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw321
Unterborn, C. T., & Panero, W. R. 2019, Journal of
Geophysical Research: Planets, 124, 1704,
doi: 10.1029/2018JE005844
Valencia, D. 2010, Proceedings of the International
Astronomical Union, 6, 181,
doi: 10.1017/S1743921311020151
Valencia, D., O'Connell, R. J., & Sasselov, D. D. 2006,
Icarus, 181, 545, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2005.11.021
Valencia, D., Sasselov, D. D., & O'Connell, R. J. 2007, The
Astrophysical Journal, 665, 1413, doi: 10.1086/519554
Wagner, F., Sohl, F., Hussmann, H., Grott, M., & Rauer, H.
2011, Icarus, 214, 366, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.05.027
Wagner, F. W., Tosi, N., Sohl, F., Rauer, H., & Spohn, T.
2012, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 541, A103,
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118441
Weiss, L. M., Rogers, L. A., Isaacson, H. T., et al. 2016,
The Astrophysical Journal, 819, 83,
doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/83
Wheatley, P. J., West, R. G., Goad, M. R., et al. 2017,
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 475,
4476, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2836
Yoo, C. S., Holmes, N. C., Ross, M., Webb, D. J., & Pike,
C. 1993, Phys. Rev. Lett., 70, 3931,
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.3931
Zeng, L., & Sasselov, D. 2013, Publications of the
Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125, 227,
doi: 10.1086/669163
Zeng, L., Jacobsen, S. B., Sasselov, D. D., et al. 2019, Proc.
Nat. Acad. Sci., 116, 9723
Zingales, T., & Waldmann, I. P. 2018, The Astronomical
Journal, 156, 268, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aae77c
|
1311.6597 | 1 | 1311 | 2013-11-26T09:06:04 | A non-grey analytical model for irradiated atmospheres. I: Derivation | [
"astro-ph.EP",
"astro-ph.SR"
] | Context. Semi-grey atmospheric models (with one opacity for the visible and one opacity for the infrared) are useful to understand the global structure of irradiated atmospheres, their dynamics and the interior structure and evolution of planets, brown dwarfs and stars. But when compared to direct numerical radiative transfer calculations for irradiated exoplanets, these models systematically overestimate the temperatures at low optical depth, independently of the opacity parameters. We wish to understand why semi-grey models fail at low optical depths, and provide a more accurate approximation to the atmospheric structure by accounting for the variable opacity in the infrared. Our analytical irradiated non-grey model is found to provide a range of temperatures that is consistent with that obtained by numerical calculations. We find that even for slightly non-grey thermal opacities the temperature structure differs significantly from previous semi-grey models. For small values of beta (expected when lines are dominant), we find that the non-grey effects are confined to low-optical depths. However, for beta larger than 0.5 (appropriate in the presence of bands with a wavelength-dependence smaller or comparable with the width of the Planck function), we find that the temperature structure is affected even down to infrared optical depths unity and deeper as a result of the so-called blanketing effect. The expressions that we derive may be used to provide a proper functional form for algorithms that invert the atmospheric properties from spectral information. Because a full atmospheric structure can be calculated directly, these expressions should be useful for simulations of the dynamics of these atmospheres and of the thermal evolution of the planets. Finally, they should be used to test full radiative transfer models and improve their convergence. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. Parmentier2013b
November 7, 2018
c(cid:13) ESO 2018
3
1
0
2
v
o
N
6
2
.
]
P
E
h
p
-
o
r
t
s
a
[
1
v
7
9
5
6
.
1
1
3
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
A non-grey analytical model for irradiated atmospheres.
I: Derivation
Vivien Parmentier1,2 and Tristan Guillot1,2
1 Laboratoire Lagrange, UMR7293, Universit´e de Nice Sophia-Antipolis, CNRS, Observatoire de la Cote d'Azur, 06300 Nice,
France e-mail: [email protected]
2 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
Re-submitted to A&A November 7, 2018
ABSTRACT
Context. Semi-grey atmospheric models (with one opacity for the visible and one opacity for the infrared) are useful to understand
the global structure of irradiated atmospheres, their dynamics and the interior structure and evolution of planets, brown dwarfs and
stars. But when compared to direct numerical radiative transfer calculations for irradiated exoplanets, these models systematically
overestimate the temperatures at low optical depth, independently of the opacity parameters.
Aims. We wish to understand why semi-grey models fail at low optical depths, and provide a more accurate approximation to the
atmospheric structure by accounting for the variable opacity in the infrared.
Methods. Using the Eddington approximation to link the energy of the beam to its radiation pressure, we derive an analytical model
to account for lines and/or bands in the infrared. Four parameters (instead of two for the semi-grey models) are used: a visible opacity
κv, two infrared opacities, κ1 and κ2, and β the fraction of the energy in the beam with opacities κ1. We consider that the atmosphere
receives an incident irradiation in the visible with an effective temperature Tirr and at an angle µ∗, and that it is heated from below
with an effective temperature Tint.
Results. Our irradiated non-grey model is found to provide a range of temperatures that is consistent with that obtained by numerical
calculations. We find that because of the variable opacities in the infrared, a smaller fraction of the source function is contributing to
the heating of the upper layers leading to smaller temperatures than in the semi-grey models. For small values of β (expected when
lines are dominant), we find that the non-grey effects are confined to low-optical depths. However, for β ∼> 1/2 (appropriate in the
presence of bands with a wavelength-dependence smaller or comparable with the width of the Planck function), we find that the
temperature structure is affected even down to infrared optical depths unity and deeper as a result of the so-called blanketing effect.
Conclusions. The expressions that we derive may be used to provide a proper functional form for algorithms that invert the atmo-
spheric properties from spectral information. Because a full atmospheric structure can be calculated directly, these expressions should
be useful for simulations of the dynamics of these atmospheres and of the thermal evolution of the planets. Finally, they should be
used to test full radiative transfer models and improve their convergence.
Key words. radiative transfer -- planets and satellites: atmospheres -- stars: atmospheres -- (Stars:) planetary systems
1. Introduction
The discovery of numerous star-planet systems and the possibil-
ity to characterize the planets' atmospheric properties has led to
a great many publications using radiative transfer calculations,
often "off-the-shelf" from numerical models. Given the a priori
infinite amount of possible compositions for mostly unknown
exoplanetary atmospheres, it is highly valuable to have the possi-
bility to perform very fast calculations and also understand what
determines the thermal structure of an irradiated atmosphere.
Analytical radiative transfer solutions for atmospheres have
been calculated with a variety of assumptions and different con-
texts (e.g. Eddington 1916; Chandrasekhar 1935, 1960; King
1956; Matsui & Abe 1986; Weaver & Ramanathan 1995; Pujol
& North 2003; Chevallier et al. 2007; Shaviv et al. 2011, among
others). However, the discovery of super-Earths, giant exoplan-
ets, brown dwarfs and low-mass stars close to a source of in-
tense radiation has prompted the need for solutions that account
for both an outside and an inside radiation field, and properly
link low and high optical depths levels. Hubeny et al. (2003),
Send offprint requests to: V.Parmentier
Rutily et al. (2008), Hansen (2008), Guillot (2010), Robinson &
Catling (2012) and Heng et al. (2012) provided such solutions
in the framework of a semi-grey model, with one opacity for the
incoming irradiation (generally mostly at visible wavelengths),
and one opacity for the thermal radiation field (generally mostly
at infrared wavelengths). These approximations have been used
in hydrodynamical models of planetary atmospheres (e.g. Heng
et al. 2011; Rauscher & Menou 2013), planetary evolution mod-
els (e.g. Miller-Ricci & Fortney 2010; Guillot & Havel 2011;
Budaj et al. 2012), planet synthesis models (Mordasini et al.
2012a,b), and a variety of other applications. They prompted
Madhusudhan & Seager (2009) to derive an inversion method
aimed at finding all possible thermal and compositional at-
mospheric structures in agreement with available spectroscopic
data.
However, as shown in Fig. 1 for an atmosphere irradiated
from above with a flux σT 4
irr and heated from below with a flux
σT 4
int, while semi-grey models provide solutions that are well-
behaved when compared to full numerical solution at optical
depths larger than about unity, the temperatures at low-optical
depth appear to be systematically hotter than in the numerical so-
1
V. Parmentier & T. Guillot: A non-grey analytical model for irradiated atmospheres
2. Assumptions and previous analytical models
2.1. Setting
eff, µ∗
= T 4
int
+ µ∗T 4
2.1.1. The equation of radiative transfer
Following Guillot (2010), we will consider the problem of a
plane-parallel atmosphere in local thermodynamic equilibrium
which receives from above a collimated flux σT 4
irr at an angle
θ∗ = cos−1(µ∗) from the vertical, and from below an isotropic
flux σT 4
int. The total energy budget of the modeled atmosphere is
then set by T 4
irr, which define the effective tem-
perature in this paper1 .The irradiation and intrinsic fluxes are
generally characterized by very different wavelengths. Although
this is not required in the solution that we propose, it is conve-
nient to think of them as being emitted preferentially the visible
and in the infrared, respectively. We will neglect scattering be-
cause it complexifies the problem dramatically and because to
first order, the solution with scattering is close to the one ob-
tained when the irradiation flux is reduced by a factor (1 − A),
where A is the Bond albedo. We note that Heng et al. (2012)
provide an elegant solution to include scattering in analytical ra-
diative transfer solutions within the two-stream approximation
(see also Meador & Weaver (1980) for a review of the different
two stream methods including scattering). We defer including
this effect to a future work.
In order to solve the radiative transfer problem for a plane
parallel atmosphere in local thermodynamic equilibrium, one
has to solve the following equation for all frequency ν and all
directions µ (Chandrasekhar 1960):
− µ
dIµν
dm
= κνIνµ − κνBν(T)
(1)
where Iµν is the specific intensity at the wavelength ν propa-
gating with an angle θ = cos−1(µ) with the vertical, κν is the
opacity at a given wavelength and Bν is the Planck function and
dm = ρdz is the mass increment along the path of the radiation.
(As usual, T, ρ and z are the atmospheric temperature, density
and height, respectively.) The main difficulty in solving eq. (1)
lies in its triple dependence on µ, ν and T and additional depen-
dence on m. An analytical solution requires simplifications in
terms both of the opacities used and/or dependence of the radia-
tion intensity with angle.
2.1.2. Opacities and optical depth
The need for simplification implies that means of the opacities
must be used. The first one by importance is the Rosseland mean,
defined as:
(cid:33)−1(cid:90) ∞
(cid:32)(cid:90) ∞
0
≡
1
κR
∂Bν
∂T
dν
1
κν
∂Bν
∂T
dν
(2)
0
It can be demonstrated that when at all wavelengths the mean
free path of photons is small compared to the scale height of the
1 We note that in stellar physics the effective temperature is usu-
ally what we call the internal temperature. In both planetary and stel-
lar fields, the effective temperature aim at representing the total energy
budget of the atmosphere. Whereas in stellar physics most of the flux
comes from the deep interior, this is no more true in irradiated atmo-
spheres and T 4
irr is a better representation of the total
energy budget of the studied slice of atmosphere. The energy budget of
the whole atmosphere is therefore T 4
eff
eff, µ∗ = T 4
int
+ µ∗T 4
= T 4
int
+ T 4
irr/4.
v
Fig. 1. Optical depth vs. atmospheric temperature in units of
the effective temperature. A numerical solution obtained from
Fortney et al. (2008) (thick black line) is compared to the semi-
grey analytical solutions of Guillot (2010) for values of the
greenhouse factor γ−1
√
ranging from 0.01 to 100 (black to red
lines). Small values of γv are redder. We used µ∗ = 1/
3,
Tirr = 1250 K corresponding to the dayside average profile of
a planet at 0.05AU from a sun-like star, and accounting for
the albedo obtained in the numerical model. The internal tem-
perature is Tint = 125K and gravity 25 ms−2. The effective
temperature of the studied slice of atmosphere1 is defined by
T 4
irr. For the numerical solution, the relation be-
eff, µ∗
tween pressure and optical depth was calculated using Rosseland
mean opacities and TiO and VO opacities were not included.
+ µ∗T 4
= T 4
int
lutions. Most severely, this occurs regardless of the choice of the
two parameters of the problem, i.e. the thermal (infrared) opac-
ity κth and the ratio of the visible to infrared opacity γv ≡ κv/κth.
For hot Jupiters, as in the example of Fig. 1, the real temperature
profiles at low optical depths can be several hundreds of Kelvins
cooler than predicted by the semi-grey solutions.
The levels probed both by transit spectroscopy and by the
observations of secondary eclipses of exoplanets often corre-
spond to low-optical depths levels (e.g. Burrows et al. 2007;
Fortney et al. 2008; Showman et al. 2009), i.e.where semi-grey
models seem to systematically overestimate the temperatures.
Furthermore, the fact that the problem persists regardless of the
main parameters implies that the functional form of the semi-
grey solutions is probably not appropriate for inversion models.
Non-grey effects are known to facilitate the cooling of the upper
atmosphere (see Pierrehumbert (2010) for a qualitative explana-
tion). Obviously they must be included. This is the purpose of
the present paper.
We hereafter first describe previous analytical methods used
to solve the radiative transfer problem analytically. In Section 3,
we then derive an analytical non-grey line model, and apply it to
the structure of irradiated giant planets in Section 4. We note at
this point that while we focus the discussion on exoplanets, we
believe that this model is applicable to a much wider variety of
problems, as long as an atmosphere is irradiated both from above
and below. Out method could also be used to solve the radiative
transfer equations in other geometries, such as the problem of
the protoplanetary disk thermal structure. We provide our con-
clusions in Section 5.
2
10-610-410-2100102104106 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 37·10-51·10-33·10-26·10-11·1012·1023·103Optical depth τPressure (bar) T/Teff,µ* V. Parmentier & T. Guillot: A non-grey analytical model for irradiated atmospheres
atmosphere, the radiative gradient obeys its well-defined diffu-
sion limit and (unless convection sets in) the temperature pro-
files becomes that obtained from a grey atmosphere in which the
opacity is set to the Rosseland mean (Mihalas & Mihalas 1984,
p. 350). We hence define the optical depth τ on the basis of the
Rosseland mean opacity, such that, along the vertical direction:
(3)
Assuming hydrostatic equilibrium, the relation between pressure
and optical depth can be found by integrating equation (3):
dτ ≡ κRdm
(cid:90) P
0
g
κR(P(cid:48), T(P(cid:48)))
τ(P) =
dP(cid:48)
(4)
The optical depth thus becomes the natural variable to account
for the dependence with depth in the radiative transfer problem.
For any strictly positive Rosseland mean opacities, equation (4)
is a bijection relating pressure and optical depth. Thus, any solu-
tion of the radiative transfer equations in terms of optical depth
can be converted to a solution in term of pressure for any func-
tional form of the Rosseland mean opacities.
The second mean of the opacity that is traditionally used for
radiative transfer is the so-called Planck mean:
(cid:32)(cid:90) ∞
0
κP ≡
(cid:33)−1(cid:90) ∞
0
Bν dν
κνBν dν
(5)
We use it to quantify the "non-greyness" of the atmosphere
through the ratio between the Planck and Rosseland means:
γP ≡ κP
κR
(6)
While the value of the Rosseland mean opacity is dominated by
the smallest values of the opacity function κν, the Planck mean
opacity is dominated by its highest values. Thus, it can be shown
that γP = 1 for a grey atmosphere and γP > 1 for a non-grey
atmosphere (King 1956).
In irradiated atmospheres, a collimated flux coming from the
star is absorbed at different atmospheric levels. We name κv the
opacity relevant to the absorption of the stellar flux. As will be
shown in Sec. 3.8, the absorption of the visible flux appear lin-
early in the radiative transfer equations. Thus a solution can be
found using multiple visible opacity bands κv1, κv2, etc.
We further define the ratio of the visible opacity to the mean
(Rosseland) thermal opacity:
γv ≡ κv/κR.
(7)
In order to solve the radiative transfer problem analytically, we
suppose that γv is constant with optical depth. Once γv is cho-
sen, we can solve the equations for the visible radiation inde-
pendently from the final thermal structure of the atmosphere. Of
course, purely grey models are such that γv = 1.
2.1.3. The picket-fence model
It is important to note at this point that two set of opacities with
different wavelength-dependence may have the same Rosseland
and Planck means. We must constrain the problem further, and
to this intent, we now consider the simplest possible line model,
known as the picket-fence model (Mihalas 1978), where the ther-
mal opacities can take two different values κ1 and κ2 (see Fig.2)
such that:
κ1
κ2
κν =
for ν ∈ [n∆ν, n∆ν + δν[
for ν ∈ [n∆ν + δν, (n + 1)∆ν[
n ∈ [1, N]
(8)
T(τ)4 =
3T 4
int
4
Fig. 2. Simplified thermal opacities for the picket-fence model.
β = δν/∆ν is the equivalent bandwidth (see text).
We define an equivalent bandwidth by:
(cid:90) n∆ν+δν
N(cid:88)
β =
1
(cid:82) ∞
(cid:17)−1. When choosing ∆ν << ∆νP, the Planck
0 Bν dν
Bν dν
(9)
n=1
n∆ν
The characteristic width of the Planck function can be defined
as ∆νP ≡ (cid:16) 1
∂Bν
∂ν
B
function can be considered constant over ∆ν and we get β =
δν/∆ν. The Planck and Rosseland mean opacities then become
(see eqs. (2) and (5)):
κ1κ2
βκ2 + (1 − β)κ1
κR =
κP = βκ1 + (1 − β)κ2
We also define the following ratios:
γ1 ≡ κ1/κR
γ2 ≡ κ2/κR
R ≡ κ1/κ2 = γ1/γ2
(cid:114)
(13)
(14)
Following Chandrasekhar (1935), we also define a limit optical
depth
τlim ≡ 1
γ1γ2
γP
3
2.2. The method of discrete ordinates for the non-irradiated
problem
2.2.1. The grey case
An approximate method to solve eq. (1) including the angular
dependency has been developed by Chandrasekhar (1960) in the
case of a non-irradiated atmosphere (Tirr = 0). The idea is to
replace the integrals over angle in eq. (1) by a gaussian sum over
µ. It can then be solved to an arbitrary precision by increasing the
number of terms in the sum. The boundary condition at the top
of the atmosphere is simply given as Iµ<0(0) = 0. The expansion
to the fourth term yields the following temperature profile:
(cid:16)
τ + Q + L1e−k1τ + L2e−k2τ + L3e−k3τ(cid:17)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(15)
(16)
3
κ2κ1n∆υ(n+1)∆υ(n+2)∆υ(n+3)∆υOpacity (κυ)Frequency (υ)δυ V. Parmentier & T. Guillot: A non-grey analytical model for irradiated atmospheres
with Q = 0.706920, L1 = −0.083921, L2 = −0.036187, L3 =
−0.009461, k1 = 1.103188, k2 = 1.591778 and k3 = 4.45808
table VIII)2. One of the strong results
(Chandrasekhar 1960,
from this formalism is that the skin temperature of the planet,
the temperature at zero optical depth, is independent of the order
of expansion and therefore corresponds to the exact value:
√
3
T 4
skin
=
T 4
int
4
(17)
This expression is exact only in the limit of a grey, non-irradiated
atmosphere.
2.2.2. The non-grey case
Chandrasekhar (1960) further developed a perturbation method
in order to include non-grey thermal opacities. This method was
improved by Krook (1963). However, these perturbation meth-
ods either work for small departure from the grey opacities or
involve a fastidious iterative procedure (e.g. Unno & Yamashita
1960; Avrett & Krook 1963) and are no longer fully analyti-
cal. However, considering that the variations in the opacities
are short compared to the variations of the Planck function,
analytical solutions can be found for an arbitrary large depar-
ture from the grey opacities. Noting the similar role of µ and
κν in eq. (1), King (1956), following Munch (1946) used the
method of discrete ordinates in order to turn the integrals over
frequency into gaussian sums. For the picket-fence model de-
fined in Section 2.1.3 and the second approximation for the an-
gular dependency, King's method leads to the following temper-
ature profile:
√
(
√
(cid:112)
γP − γ1)(
γ1γ2
γP − γ2)
3γP
3
4
3γP
T 4
int
+ τ +
T 4(τ) =
(e−τ/τlim − 1)
(18)
As in the grey case, the method of discrete ordinates leads to an
exact relation for the skin temperature, whatever the dependency
of κν with frequency (but no dependence in pressure or tempera-
ture):
1(cid:112)
(cid:115)
T 4
skin
=
3
γP
T 4
int
4
(19)
In the grey limit, γP = 1 and we recover eq. (17). Otherwise,
γP > 1, implying that for a non-irradiated atmosphere, non-grey
effects will always tend to lower the atmospheric skin tempera-
ture.
(cid:90) 1
−1
2.3. Moment equation method
2.3.1. Equations for the momentum of the radiation intensity
A simpler way to solve the radiative transfer equation has been
carried out by Eddington (1916). The idea is to solve the equa-
tion using the different momentum of the intensity defined as:
(Jν, Hν, Kν) =
Iµν(1, µ, µ2) dµ
(20)
Then, integrating over ν and µ eq. (1) and µ times eq. (1) one
gets the momentum equations:
= Jν − Bν(T)
dHν
dτν
(21)
2 We noticed that the values of L1 and L3 in Chandrasekhar's book
were inverted and corrected this here.
4
dKν
dτν
= Hν
(22)
(cid:90) ∞
Assuming the atmosphere to be in radiative equilibrium, we can
write:
(κνJν − κνBν) dν = 0
0
(23)
For a grey atmosphere (κν = κR ∀ν), eqs. (21 -- 23) can be inte-
grated over frequency, leading to an equation on J, H, K and
B, the frequency-integrated version of Jν, Hν, Kν and Bν. The
radiative equilibrium equation becomes:
J = B
(24)
Equations (21 -- 23) are then a set of three equations with
four unknowns. The system is not closed because by integrat-
ing eq. (1) over all angles we have lost the information on
the angular dependency of the irradiation. A closure relation-
ship that contains angular dependency of the radiation field is
therefore needed. A common closure relationship, known as the
Eddington approximation is:
J = 3K
(25)
0 and Iµ<0 = I−
This relationship is exact in two very different cases: when the
radiation field is isotropic (Iµ independent of µ) and in the two-
stream approximation (Iµ>0 = I+
0 ) Although this
seems a very restrictive approximation, it is relevant for the deep
layers of the atmosphere due to the quasi-isotropy of the radi-
ation field there. It is also good for the top of the atmosphere,
where the flux comes mainly from the τ ≈ 1 layer. Indeed, the
exact solution gives a ratio J/K that differs by no more than 20%
from the 1/3 ratio over the whole atmosphere and leads to a tem-
perature profile which is correct to 4% in the grey case (see the
plain blue line of Fig. 4 hereafter).
2.3.2. Top boundary condition
Although in the method of discrete ordinates the boundary con-
dition at the top of the atmosphere is intuitive, in the momen-
tum equations method it is less obvious and different choices
has been made by different authors. Usually, the expression for
J is known and some integration constant needs to be found.
Two equations are needed, one for J(0) and one for H(0). Four
possibilities are widely used in the literature from which one has
to choose two:
1. The radiative equilibrium equation that relates the emergent
flux at the top of the atmosphere to the internal flux from the
planet and the incident flux from the star.
2. An ad-hoc relation between H(0) and J(0) at τ = 0: H(0) =
fHJ(0), where fH is often called the second Eddington coef-
ficient.
3. A calculation of H(0) from the second moment equation (eq.
(22)) and the Eddington approximation.
(cid:82) ∞
0 B (τ) E2(τ) dτ
4. A calculation of H(0) from the integration of the source
function through the entire atmosphere, known as the Milne
equation (Mihalas & Mihalas 1984, p. 347): H(0) =
1
2
For grey and semi-grey models, the first condition is natu-
ral. Therefore it is used by Hansen (2008) and Guillot (2010).
For the other part of the top boundary condition, Guillot (2010)
choose to use the second and Hansen (2008) the fourth condi-
tion. (See Appendix A of Guillot (2010) for a comparison of the
expressions).
V. Parmentier & T. Guillot: A non-grey analytical model for irradiated atmospheres
In the case of a non-grey model, the first condition cannot
be implemented (at least directly) because it is a constraint on
the total thermal flux but it provides no information on how the
thermal flux is split between the opacity bands that are consid-
ered. Chandrasekhar (1935) therefore uses for his non-grey, non-
irradiated model conditions 2 and 3 in each of the opacity band.
He further notes that using condition 4 instead of condition 3
should yield better results, but leads to more complex expres-
sions. In this work, because an accurate treatment of the flux
is needed for the non-grey irradiated model, we will use condi-
tions 2 and 4 in each of the opacity band. All these models are
discussed in the next sections and summarized in table 2.3.5.
2.3.3. Non-irradiated, grey case
In this section we consider the case Tirr = 0. Under the grey
approximation, using the conditions 1 and 4, it can be shown
that (Mihalas & Mihalas 1984, p.357):
(cid:33)
+ τ
(cid:32)2
3
T 4(τ) =
3
4
T 4
int
which leads to the same solution than assuming condition 2 with
fH = 1/2. The skin temperature is then:
T 4
skin
= 2
T 4
int
4
√
3/2.
which differs from the exact solution [eq. (17)] by a factor
Assuming fH = 1/
3 is thus tempting, as it leads to the correct
skin temperature, but, on the other hand, it leads to a temperature
profile which is less accurate around τ ≈ 1.
2.3.4. Non-irradiated non-grey picket-fence model
Chandrasekhar (1935) provides solutions to the moment equa-
tions for the picket-fence model presented in Section 2.1.3. He
assumes that the relation H(0) = 1
J(0) with fH = 1/2, valid in
fH
the grey case under the Eddington approximation [see eq. (27)],
holds for the two thermal channels separately. Using this condi-
tion together with condition 3 he obtains the following tempera-
ture profile:
(26)
(27)
√
T 4(τ) =
3T 4
int
4
+
3T 4
int
4
γPτlim
3γP
and the equation for the skin temperature:
3
1 + 1
2
γP
τ +
(cid:32)
+
2
3
1 + 1
2
γP − 1√
1
3γP
3γP
√
(cid:113)
(cid:112)
(cid:33) 1√
(cid:112)
(cid:113)
2 +
2 + (cid:112)
+
3
γP
3γP
T 4
skin
= 2
1 − e−τ/τlim(cid:17)
(cid:16)
T 4
int
4
(28)
(29)
As expected, this equation reduces to eq. (27) in the limit γP = 1.
For large values of γP, it is easy to show that this relation differs
by a factor 4/3 from the exact one derived with the method of
discrete ordinates. As for the grey case, using fH = 1/
3 would
lead to the exact solution for the skin temperature, but at the
expense of the accuracy of the profile at deeper levels. Again,
we note that, in the non-irradiated case, the temperature at the
top of the atmosphere is determined by a single parameter, γP,
representing the "non-greyness" of the atmosphere.
√
2.3.5. Irradiated semi-grey model
In the case of irradiated atmospheres, the presence of an incom-
ing collimated flux at the top of the atmosphere breaks the an-
gular symmetry of the equations. The radiative transfer prob-
lem thus cannot be solved analytically (at least not in a simple
way) through the discrete ordinates technique any longer. The
momentum method is thus required.
In order to solve the problem, the radiation field is split into
two parts: The incoming, collimated radiation field on one hand,
the thermal radiation field on the other. The radiative equilib-
rium equation (eq. (23)) links the two streams as can be seen in
Section 3.1 (see also Hansen 2008; Guillot 2010; Robinson &
Catling 2012). As mentioned previously in Section 2.1.2, when
the incident radiation is at much shorter wavelength than the
thermal emission of the atmosphere, the two streams correspond
to different characteristic wavelengths and may often be labelled
as "visible" and "infrared". This not a requirement however: the
solutions apply if the radiation field correspond to other wave-
lengths or if they overlap.
As discussed previously (Section 2.3.2), the boundary condi-
tion at the top of the model can be chosen in several ways. When
√
using condition 2, Guillot (2010) lets the value of fH be either
1/2 or 1/
3, based on the values obtained in the non-irradiated
case. fH = 1/2 is the value that arises from the calculation of the
√
angle dependence between H(0) and J(0) in the isotropic case,
but fH = 1/
3 provides a skin temperature that agrees with
the exact value. The two solutions differ by ≈ 3% at most (see
Fig. 5), and choosing one over another is not crucial. In any case,
for an easier comparison, we provide here the solution of Guillot
(2010) for fH = 1/2:
T 4 =
(cid:34)2
3
3T 4
int
4
3T 4
irr
4 µ∗
+
+ τ
(cid:35)
(cid:34)2
3
(cid:32)
+
µ∗
γv
+
γv
3µ∗
− µ∗
γv
(cid:33)
(cid:35)
.
e−γvτ/µ∗
(30)
where µ∗ is the cosine of the angle of the incident radiation. The
skin temperature is:
T 4
int
+ µ∗T 4
irr
4
T 4
skin
+ γvT 4
irr
= 2
(31)
For γv → 0, the incident radiation is absorbed in the deep lay-
ers of the atmosphere and the skin temperature converges to the
skin temperature of a grey model with an effective temperature
T 4
= T 4
irr. The semi-grey model depends only on the
eff, µ∗
int
parameter γv.
+ µ∗T 4
As discussed in introduction (see Fig. 1), the semi-grey
model predicts minimum temperatures that are generally higher
than numerical solutions for irradiated exoplanets, indepen-
dently of the choice of γv. In fact, similarly to the skin tem-
perature, the minimum temperature of a semi-grey atmosphere,
shown in Fig. 3, depends only on the values of Teff, µ∗ and γv. It is
lowest and equal to Teff, µ∗ /21/4 both in the γv → 0 and γv → ∞
limits. This lower bound for the semi-grey temperature profile
is hotter than what the one obtained by numerical calculations
taking into account the full set of opacities. The discrepancy is
much larger than the variations resulting from the approximation
of the momentum method. Clearly, non-grey effects must be in-
voked to explain the low temperatures obtained by numerical
models at low optical depths.
5
V. Parmentier & T. Guillot: A non-grey analytical model for irradiated atmospheres
Table 1. Summary of the different models compared in this paper.
Model
Numerical
King (1955)
Chandrasekhar (1935)
Hansen (2008)
√
Guillot (2010), fH = 1/2
Guillot (2010), fH = 1/
This model
3
External
irradiation
√
×
×
√
√
√
√
Eddington
approx.
×
×
√
√
√
√
√
Non-grey
thermal
opacities
√
√
√
×
×
×
√
Top boundary
condition
Expression
I(0) = Istar for µ < 0
I(0) = 0 for µ < 0
eq (22) & fH = 1/2
Rad. eq. & eq. (50)
√
Rad. eq. & fH = 1/2
Rad. eq. & fH = 1/
3
eq. (50) & fH = 1/2
(cid:90) (n+1)∆ν
(cid:88)
n
n∆ν+δν
X2 =
N/A
eq. (18)
eq. (28)
--
eq. (30)
--
eq. (76)
Xν dν
(35)
The Planck function is considered constant over each bin of
frequency ∆ν and therefore B1 = βB and B2 = (1 − β)B. We
now assume that the Eddington approximation is valid in the
two bands separately: J(1,2) = 3K(1,2). Equations (32) and (33)
can be combined into:
d2J1
dτ2
1(J1 − βB)
= 3γ2
2(J2 − (1 − β)B)
= 3γ2
d2J2
dτ2
(36)
(37)
and the radiative equilibrium equation becomes:
Fig. 3. Minimum temperature of the semi-grey model in terms
of the effective temperature as a function of γv/µ∗.
3. An analytical irradiated non-grey picket-fence
model
3.1. Equations
We now derive the equations for an irradiated atmosphere in lo-
cal thermodynamic equilibrium with infrared line opacities as
described in sec. 2.1.2. Thus, our model contains three differ-
ent opacities: κ1 and κ2 for the thermal radiation and κv rele-
vant for the incoming radiation of the star. As explained be-
fore, the difference between the thermal and the visible chan-
nel is based on the angular dependency of the radiation and not
on the frequency. Although the method of discrete ordinates is
shown to lead to more exact results, it is complex to adapt to
the irradiated case. Therefore, following Chandrasekhar (1935)
and Guillot (2010), we solve the radiative transfer equations us-
ing the momentum equations. Integrating eqs. (21) and (22) over
each thermal band we obtain:
dH(1,2)
dτ
= γ(1,2)J(1,2) − γ(1,2)(β, 1 − β)B(T)
dK(1,2)
dτ
= γ(1,2)H(1,2)
(32)
(33)
Where the subscript indicates the integrated quantities over
the given thermal band. Thus for a quantity Xν we have:
(cid:90) n∆ν+δν
(cid:88)
n
n∆ν
Xν dν
(34)
X1 =
6
γ1J1 + γ2J2 + γvJv = γPB,
(38)
where the quantities with subscript v are the momentum of the
incident stellar radiation. They can be directly calculated when
assuming that the incoming stellar radiation arrives as a col-
limated flux and hit the top of the atmosphere with an angle
θ∗ = cos−1 µ∗:
(Jv, Hv, Kv) = (1, µ∗, µ2∗)I∗
(39)
I∗ν dν is the total incident intensity.
The absorption of the stellar irradiation can be treated sepa-
rately from the thermal radiation and Jv is given by eq. (13) of
Guillot (2010):
and I∗ =(cid:82) ∞
0
Jv(τ) = − Hv(0)
µ∗
e−γ∗
vτ
(40)
where we have simplified the notation by introducing the param-
eter γ∗
v ≡ γv/µ∗.
Equations (36) to (38) are a set of three coupled equations
with three unknowns J1, J2, B. In order to decouple these equa-
tions we define two new variables:
Jγ ≡ J1
γ1
Jγ3 ≡ J1
γ3
1
J2
γ3
2
J2
γ2
(41)
+
+
Conversely we can come back to the original variables:
J1 = − γ3
J2 =
2Jγ3 − Jγ)
1(γ2
1 − γ2
γ2
1Jγ3 − Jγ)
2(γ2
γ3
1 − γ2
γ2
2
2
(42)
0.84 0.86 0.88 0.9 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Tmin/Teff,µ*γv/µ* V. Parmentier & T. Guillot: A non-grey analytical model for irradiated atmospheres
Using the combination of equations 1
γ1
(38) we get:
(36)+ 1
γ2
(37) and equation
applying the boundary condition eq. (47), we get C2 = 3H. For
τ = 0 we obtain:
d2Jγ
dτ2
= −3γvJv
(43)
Jγ(0) = C1 +
3
γ∗
v
Hv(0)
(52)
Using equation (45) to eliminate B and replacing Jγ by its solu-
tion, eq. (44) becomes:
d2Jγ3
dτ2 − 3
(γ1γ2)2
γP
Jγ3 = 3
+ 3
+ 3
(C1 + 3Hτ)
3
Hv(0)e−γ∗
γ∗
v
1
1 − γ2
1 − γ2
+ γ2
2
γP
+ γ2
2
γP
Hv(0)e−γ∗
1
vτ
γ∗
v
γP
vτ
(53)
Again, solutions of this differential equation must be the sum of
the solutions of the homogeneous equation and one solution of
the complete equation. The homogeneous solution must have the
form:
Jγ3H = C3e−τ/τlim + C4e+τ/τlim
(54)
where C3 and C4 are constants of integration to be determined
using the boundary conditions. We look for a particular solu-
tion formed by the superposition of an exponential and an affine
function. The affine function must then be a solution of eq. (53)
with Hv(0) = 0:
Jγ3P1 = − γP
(γ1γ2)2
+ γ2
2
γP
1
1 − γ2
1 − γ2
1
(C1 + 3Hτ)
3
γ∗
v
γP
γ∗
+
v
+ γ2
2
γP
(55)
Hv(0)e−γ∗
vτ
and the exponential function must be solution of eq. (53), keep-
ing only the exponential part on the right-hand side:
Jγ3P2 =
γP
(γ1γ2)2
1
vτlim)2 − 1
(γ∗
(47)
(56)
Applying the boundary condition defined by eq. (48) to the full
solution Jγ3 = Jγ3P1 + Jγ3P2 + Jγ3H, we find C4 = 0. The full
solution of equation (44) is hence given by:
Jγ3(τ) = Jγ3P1 + Jγ3P2 + C3e−τ/τlim
(57)
We can get an expression for the source function by replacing Jγ
and Jγ3 in the radiative equilibrium equation [eq. (45)]:
The combination of equations 1
γ3
1
(36)+ 1
γ3
2
(37) yields:
d2Jγ3
dτ2
= 3(Jγ − B)
(44)
2)Jγ − (γ1γ2)2Jγ3, eq. (38)
Noting that γ1J1 + γ2J2 = (γ2
1
becomes:
+ γ2
B =
γ2
1
+ γ2
2
γP
Jγ − (γ1γ2)2
γP
Jγ3 +
γv
γP
Jv
(45)
Equations (43), (44) and (45) are now a set of two uncoupled
differential equations and a linear equation.
3.2. Boundary conditions
In order the solve the differential equations we need to specify
the boundary conditions. When τ → +∞ we want to fulfill the
diffusion approximation: Jν = Bν (Mihalas & Mihalas 1984, p.
350). In our case this translates to J1 = βB and J2 = (1 − β)B.
Furthermore, at these levels, the gradient of B should also obey
the diffusion approximation (Mihalas & Mihalas 1984):
dB
dτ
∼
τ→+∞ 3H∞
(46)
where 4πH∞ = σT 4
int is the thermal flux coming from the interior
of the planet. Using the system of equations (41) and noting that
β
γ1
= 1, we can derive a condition on Jγ and Jγ3:
+ 1−β
γ2
dJγ
dτ
∼
τ→+∞
β
∼
τ→+∞ 3H∞
1 − β
γ3
2
+
3H∞
dJγ3
dτ
(48)
For τ → 0 we specify the geometry of the intensity by setting:
(49)
J(1,2)(0) = 2H(1,2)(0)
γ3
1
Furthermore, we calculate the flux at the top of the atmosphere
in each band using equation (79.21) from Mihalas & Mihalas
(1984). From the assumption of local thermodynamic equilib-
rium, the source function in the two bands is S 1(τ1) = βB(τ/γ1)
and S 2(τ2) = (1 − β)B(τ/γ2). The upper boundary condition on
the flux of the 2 bands thus becomes:
(β, (1 − β))B
(cid:90) ∞
H(1,2)(0) =
E2(τ) dτ
(50)
(cid:32)
(cid:33)
τ
1
2
0
γ(1,2)
3.3. Solution
The solution of a second order differential equation with con-
stant coefficient is the sum of the solutions of the homogeneous
equation and a particular solution of the complete equation.
Thus, solutions of eq. (43) must be of the form:
Hv(0)e−γ∗
Jγ(τ) = C1 + C2τ +
(51)
vτ
3
γ∗
v
v/γ1)2(cid:105)(cid:104)
(cid:104)
B = C1 + 3Hτ − (γ1γ2)2
γP
3 − (γ∗
v(1 − γ∗2
v τ2
lim)
3 − (γ∗
3γ∗
+
C3e−τ/τlim
v/γ2)2(cid:105)
(58)
Hv(0)e−γ∗
vτ
In order to get the complete solution of the problem, we need
to determine the two remaining integration constants C1 and C3
using the boundary condition (49). For that we need to calculate
J1(0), J2(0), H1(0) and H2(0). The first two quantities can be
evaluated using the values of Jγ(0) and Jγ3(0) from equation (51)
and (57) into the system (42):
C1
J1(0) = − γ1 (γ2 − 1)
(cid:16)
γ1 − γ2
(cid:16)
3 (γ1 + γ2) (γ2 − 1) − γ∗2
γ∗2
v τ2
1 − γ2
γ2
γ∗
(cid:17)
(cid:16)
γ1
+
2
v
(cid:17)
v + 3γ2
lim − 1
1γ∗2
v τ2
lim
1γ2
− γ3
2
1 − γ2
γ2
2
C3
(cid:17)
Hv(0)
(59)
7
V. Parmentier & T. Guillot: A non-grey analytical model for irradiated atmospheres
J2(0) =
C1
γ2 (γ1 − 1)
(cid:16)
γ1 − γ2
(cid:16)
3 (γ1 + γ2) (γ1 − 1) − γ∗2
γ∗2
v τ2
γ∗
(cid:17)
(cid:16)
v
(cid:17)
v + 3γ2
lim − 1
− γ2
(cid:17)
Hv(0)
(60)
2γ∗2
v τ2
lim
3.4. Atmospheric temperature profile
Using the relations B = σT 4/π, H = σT 4
−µ∗σT 4
temperature at any optical depth:
int/4π and Hv(0) =
irr/4π and eq. (58), we can derive the equation for the
(cid:16)
τ + A + Be−τ/τlim(cid:17)
(cid:16)
C + De−τ/τlim + Ee−γ∗
vτ(cid:17)
T 4 =
+
3T 4
int
4
3T 4
irr
4 µ∗
γp
b0
(γ1γ2)2
(a0 + a1b0)
1
A =
3
B = −1
3
C = −1
[b0b1(1 + b2 + b3)a1 + a2 + a3]
3
(cid:104)
(γ1γ2)2
1
3
γp
3 − (γ∗
9γ∗
v/γ1)2(cid:105)(cid:104)
v/γ2)2(cid:105)
vτlim)2 − 1(cid:3)
(cid:2)(γ∗
b0b1(1 + b2 + b3)
3 − (γ∗
D =
E =
v
(76)
(77)
(78)
(79)
(80)
(81)
3.5. Grey limit
In the grey limit, γP → 1 (as γ1 and γ2) and we obtain:
∗
v
(cid:16)
(cid:17)
∗
v)
1/γ
∗2
v + 2/γ
∗
v + 2 log(1 + γ
A → 2/3
B → 0
C → 2/3 − 2/γ
D → 0
E → γ
v/3 − 1/γ
∗
(82)
(83)
v − 1/(3γ
∗
∗3
v)
(84)
(85)
(86)
v → 0 we obtain C → 2/3 + 1/γ∗
If we further assume that γ∗
v,
E → −1/γ∗
v and the solution converges towards that of Guillot
(2010) (see eq. (30)). The fact that for other values of γ∗
v our
model differs from the solutions of Guillot (2010) (see also
Hansen (2008)) is due to the different boundary conditions used
in the two models as explained in Section 2.3.2. However, cal-
culations shows that the value of C obtained here differ from the
same coefficient extracted from eq. (30) by at most 12% and that
v → ∞. As seen in figure 5,
the two solutions converge also for γ∗
in the semi-grey limit, and when calculating the full temperature
profile, our model differs by at most 2% from the Guillot (2010)
model. The difference between the various solutions must be at-
tributed to the Eddington approximation.
3.6. Using the model
The temperature vs. optical depth profile for our irradiated
picket-fence model is given by eq. (76). The profile has been
derived using the Rosseland optical depth as vertical coordinate.
It is therefore valid for any functional form of the Rosseland
opacities. Equation (4) allows to switch from τ to P as the
vertical coordinate. Although, for convenience, this expression
contains 4 different variables, γ1, γ2, γP, τlim, it must be kept in
mind that, besides the Rosseland mean opacity, there are only
two independent variables in the problem. The variables β and
+
γ3
2γ2
1
1 − γ2
γ2
Noting that:
2
C3
2
1 − γ2
γ2
(cid:90) ∞
(cid:90) ∞
0
E2(τ)dτ =
(cid:90) ∞
0
τE2(τ)dτ =
0
e−ατE2(τ) dτ = −1
2
+
1
α
1
2
1
3
− ln(1 + α)
α2
with
(61)
(62)
(63)
we can evaluate H1(0) and H2(0) by inserting eq. (58) into
eq. (50). Then, eq. (49) is a linear system of two equations with
two unknowns. After some calculations we get the expressions
for C1 and C3:
C1 = (a0 + a1b0)H + (a1b0b1(1 + b2 + b3) + a2 + a3)Hv(0) (64)
(65)
(66)
(cid:35)
C3 = b0H + b0b1(1 + b2 + b3)Hv(0)
where we have:
(cid:34) γp
1 − γp
(cid:17)(cid:16)
a1 = − 1
3τ2
lim
(cid:16)
τ2
×
lim
γPγ∗2
1 − γ∗2
3γ2
a2 =
v
v
+
1
γ2
1
a0 =
γ1
γ1 + γ2 − 2
γ1 + γ2
+ (γ1 + γ2)τlim − (At,1 + At,2)τ2
lim
(67)
(cid:17)(cid:17)
(cid:16)
(cid:16)
2 − γ∗2
1γ2
v
6γ2
γ2
1
+ γ2
2
(cid:17)
2 − γ∗2
3γ2
v
(γ1 + γ2) − 3γ∗
1 − γ∗2
v τ2
lim
v
a3 = − τ2
lim(3γ2
γ1γ2
γ1 − γ2
b0 =
At,1 − At,2
3
γ1γ2(3γ2
b1 =
b2 =
where we defined:
(68)
−1
−
(69)
v )τ2
lim
(γ1γ2)3
1 − γ∗2
2 − γ∗2
v )(3γ2
v )(Av,2 + Av,1)
v (1 − γ∗2
γPγ∗3
v τ2
lim)
− (γ1γ2)2(cid:112)
(1 − γ1)(1 − γ2)(γ1 + γ2)
3γP
(70)
2 − γ∗2
1 − γ∗2
v )(3γ2
lim − 1)
v (γ∗2
γPγ∗2
v τ2
3(γ1 + γ2)γ∗3
1 − γ∗2
v )(3γ2
Av,2 − Av,1
v(γ1 − γ2)
γ∗
(cid:32)
2 − γ∗2
v )
b3 =
(3γ2
(71)
(72)
(73)
(cid:33)
v
At,i = γ2
i ln
1 +
(cid:32)
1
(cid:33)
τlimγi
γ∗
v
γi
1 +
Av,i = γ2
i ln
8
(74)
(75)
V. Parmentier & T. Guillot: A non-grey analytical model for irradiated atmospheres
R ≡ γ1/γ2 = κ1/κ2 are the ones to consider to have a control on
the opacity function used. The variables γP and τlim are the ones
to consider to have a control on the profile itself. γP is directly
related to the skin temperature of the planet (see section 4.3)
whereas τlim is the optical depth at which the irradiated picket-
fence model differs from the semi-grey model. The steps to use
our model are as follows:
1) Choose the pair of variables suitable for the problem: (R, β)
or (γP, τlim) for example
2) Using eqs (87) to (95), calculate the values of γP, γ1, γ2 and
τlim
3) Using eqs (77) to (81) and eqs (66) to (75), calculate the co-
efficients A, B, C, D and E.
4) Using eq. (76), calculate the temperature/optical depth profile
5) Using eq. (4), calculate the pressure/optical depth relation-
ship and therefore the pressure/temperature profile
For Rosseland opacities depending on the temperature, step 5)
can be iterated until convergence. Given the apparent complexity
of the solution, we provide a ready-to-use code1 in different lan-
guages that gives the temperature/optical depth profile (steps 1
to 4) or the temperature/pressure profile given a Rosseland mean
opacity.
The relationship between the different variables are listed be-
low:
β + R − βR
− (β + R − βR)2
R
R
R
√
√
τlim =
γP = β + R − βR +
(cid:113)
β (R − 1)2 − β2 (R − 1)2 + R
(cid:112)
3 (β + R − βR)2
√
(cid:112)
3γP + 3γPτlim − √
∆ − (cid:112)
(cid:16)
3γP + 3γPτlim
√
2
3γP + 3γPτlim +
R =
β =
√
∆
∆
√
√
3γP + 3γ3/2
2
P τlim − 4
∆ = 3γP + 3
γPτlim
∆
(cid:17)
√
3
γ1 = β + R − βR
β + R − βR
γ2 =
R
√
6τlim
3γP + 3γPτlim +
(cid:112)
(cid:112)
3γP + 3γPτlim − √
(cid:115)(cid:32)
(cid:33)2
6τlim
γP − 1
2β(1 − β)
+
+
∆
∆
γP − 1
2β(1 − β)
γ1 =
γ2 =
R = 1 +
γP − 1
2β(1 − β)
1 https://www.oca.eu/parmentier/nongrey
(87)
(88)
(89)
(90)
(91)
(92)
(93)
(94)
(95)
(96)
3.7. About averaging
Equation (76) can thus be considered as depending on κR, γP ≡
κP/κR and β. While κR can be considered as a function of pres-
sure and temperature (e.g. extracted from a known Rosseland
opacity table) when deriving the atmospheric temperature pro-
file, it is important to realize that the analytical solution re-
mains valid only if γP and β are held constant. This analytical
solution therefore cannot accomodate consistent Rosseland and
Planck opacities as a function of depth (a solution consisting
of atmospheric slices with different values of γP is derived in
Chandrasekhar (1935) for the non-irradiated case but becomes
too complex to be handled easily).
Furthermore, the solution is provided only for one fixed di-
rection of the incoming irradiation. When considering the case
of a non-resolved planet around a star, any information acquired
on its atmosphere will have been averaged over at least a frac-
tion of its surface. Solving this problem for the particular case of
eq. (76) goes beyond the scope of the present work, but it can be
approximated relatively well on the basis of the study by Guillot
(2010). This work shows that given an irradiation flux at the sub-
sub ≡ σ(R∗/D)2T 4∗ , where T∗ is the star's effective
stellar point σT 4
temperature, R∗ its radius and D the star-planet distance, the av-
erage temperature profile of the planet will be very close to that
√
obtained from the 1-dimensional solution with an average an-
gle µ∗ = 1/
3 and an average irradiation effective temperature
Tirr = (1 − A)1/4 f 1/4Tsub, where A is the (assumed) Bond albedo
of the atmosphere and f is a correction factor, equal to 1/4 when
averaging on the entire surface of the planet and equal to 1/2
when averaging on the day-side only. This corresponds to the
so-called "isotropic approximation" and is found to be within
2% of the "exact" semi-grey average for a typical hot-Jupiter
(see Fig. 2 of Guillot (2010)).
For the interpretation of spectroscopic and photometric data
of secondary eclipses, the dayside average is often used ( f =
1/2). For the calculation of evolution models, the global average
is the correct physical quantity to be used in the absence of a
clear knowledge of the composition and opacity variations in
latitude and longitude (see Guillot 2010). In that case, f = 1/4
which is equivalent to setting the irradiation temperature equal to
the usual equilibrium temperature defined as Teq ≡ T∗(R∗/2D)1/2
(Saumon et al. 1996).
Obviously however, detailed interpretations must use an ap-
proach mixing three-dimensional dynamical and radiative trans-
fer models (see Guillot 2010; Heng et al. 2012).
3.8. Adding several bands in the visible
Although, for the simplicity of the derivation, our model used
only one spectral band in the visible channel, it can be easily ex-
tended to n visible bands. The key point is that our equations, and
in particular eq. (43) are linear in the visible. Thus, the equations
can be solved for any linear combination of visible bands. In that
case the first momentum of the visible intensity (see eq. (40))
would write :
n(cid:88)
i=1
Jv(τ) = − Hv(0)
µ∗
βvie−γ∗
viτ
(97)
Where βvi is the relative spectral extend of the ith band and γvi =
κvi/κR with κvi the opacity in the ith visible band. Equation (76)
9
V. Parmentier & T. Guillot: A non-grey analytical model for irradiated atmospheres
Fig. 4. Comparison of the non-irradiated solutions of the radia-
tive transfer problem within the so-called picket-fence model ap-
proximation (see text). The left panel shows temperature (in Teff
units) versus optical depth. The right panel shows the relative
temperature difference between our model and other works. The
models shown correspond to the solutions of King (1955) (blue
lines), Chandrasekhar (1935) (green lines), and this work (red).
Different models correspond to the grey case (plain), i.e. R = 1,
and 2 non-grey cases: β = 0.01, R = 103 (dashed) and β = 0.7,
R = 103 (dotted). (R ≡ κ1/κ2). The red and green lines are so
similar that they are almost indistinguishable on the left panel.
Fig. 5. Comparison between our model in the semi-grey limit
and Guillot (2010). We used γv = 0.25 (plain line) and γv = 10
(dashed line). For the Guillot (2010) model we show the curves
for two different boundary conditions: fH = 1/2 (blue) and fH =
1/
3 (green). We used µ∗ = 1/
√
√
3.
with those of this work. These differences are of the same kind as
those arising from the use of the Eddington approximation com-
pared to exact solutions discussed previously. They are inherent
to the approximation made on the angle dependence of the ra-
diation field and implicitly linked to the choice of the different
boundary solutions discussed in Section 2.3.2.
then becomes:
T 4 =
+
3T 4
int
4
n(cid:88)
i=1
(cid:16)
τ + A + Be−τ/τlim(cid:17)
(cid:16)
Ci + Die−τ/τlim + Eie−γ∗
viτ(cid:17)
3βviT 4
irr
µ∗
4
4.3. Comparison of skin temperatures
(98)
where Ci, Di and Ei are the coefficients C, D and E given by
equation (79) to (81) where γ∗
v have been replaced by γ∗
vi.
4. Comparisons
4.1. Comparison of non-irradiated solutions
Figure 4 shows a comparison between our results and the solu-
tions of King (1955) and Chandrasekhar (1935). The solutions
are extremely close, the temperatures being always less than a
few percent of each other. Our solution is almost identical to that
of Chandrasekhar (1935), a consequence of using the Eddington
approximation and similar boundary conditions. The difference
of these with the exact solution from King (1955) can be at-
tributed to the Eddington approximation.
The non-grey effects lead to colder temperatures at small op-
tical depths. When β is close to unity, a blanketing effect leads to
a heating of the deeper layers too. All solutions have the correct
behavior.
4.2. Comparison of irradiated solutions
The solutions presented in this work for the irradiated case in the
semi-grey case (i.e. R ≡ κ1/κ2 = 1) are very similar to those of
Guillot (2010). As seen in Fig. 5, the solutions obtained either
with fH = 1/2, fH = 1/
3 have relative differences of up to 2%
√
10
Fig. 6. Skin temperature of the planet given by our irradiated
picket-fence model for different value of γv and in the non-
irradiated case. Curves for β = 0.01 (plain lines) and β = 0.5
(dash lines) are shown. Skin temperature from Chandrasekhar
(1935) and King (1956) are also shown. For the irradiated
case we used µ∗ = 1/
3 and f = 0.5. The γv = 0.1, the
non-irradiated and the Chandrasekhar (1935) curves are closely
packed.
√
As discussed previously, the skin temperature (temperature
at the limit of zero optical depth) is an important outcome of ra-
diative transfer and in the case of non-irradiated models, an exact
10-610-410-2100102 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5Optical depth τT/Teff, µ*-8-6-4-202 T / Ta - 1 (%)This workKingChandra R=1 (Grey)β=0.01, R=103β=0.7, R=10310-610-410-2100102104106 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5Optical depth τT/Teff, µ*-2-1012 T / Ta - 1 (%)This workGuillot, fH=1/2Guillot, fH=1/√3γv=0.25γv=10 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6100101102103Tskin / Teff, µ*γp=κp/κrγv=10γv=1γv=0.1No irr.ChandraKingβ=0.5β=0.01 V. Parmentier & T. Guillot: A non-grey analytical model for irradiated atmospheres
solution is available. We compare our results to analytical results
in Fig. 6. In the limit of a non-irradiated planet and in the limit
v → 0, our skin temperature converges to the one derived by
γ∗
Chandrasekhar (1935). This is an important test for the model,
as for small values of γv, most of the stellar flux is absorbed in
the deep layers of the planet and the model is expected to behave
as a non-irradiated model with the same effective temperature.
Moreover, we note that for small values of γv, the skin tempera-
ture is affected only by γP as was already claimed by King (1956)
and Chandrasekhar (1935). This conclusion no longer applies for
larger values of γv for which the skin temperatures then also de-
pend on β. This can be seen by comparing the dotted lines and
plain lines of the same color in figure 6. At a given value of γP,
a larger value of β corresponds to a smaller κ2/κ1. Depending of
the value of β, the stellar irradiation can be absorbed in a region
which can be optically thick to the two thermal bands, only one,
or none, leading to a different behavior for the skin temperature.
5. Consequences of non-grey effects
In this section we study the physical processes that shape our
non-grey temperature profile. To overcome the apparent com-
plexity of our solution, we first derive an approximate expression
for the thermal fluxes at the top of the atmosphere. Using this ex-
pression, we obtain a much simpler expression for the skin and
the deep temperatures. Comparing these expressions with their
semi-grey equivalent, we get physical insights on the processes
that shape the temperature profile.
5.1. Estimation of the fluxes in the different bands
In steady state, all the energy that penetrates the atmosphere
must be radiated away. Thus, the radiative equilibrium at the top
of the atmosphere provides great insights on the physical pro-
cesses that shape the temperature profile. In particular whether
the thermal fluxes are transported by the channel of highest opac-
ity (channel 1) or the channel of lowest opacity (channel 2) is of
particular importance.
As seen in eq. (76) the contribution to the final temperature
of the internal luminosity and of the external irradiation are inde-
pendent. Thus, the thermal fluxes can be split in two independent
contributions that can be studied separatly:
Hi = Hi, int + Hi, irr
(99)
Figure 9 shows which thermal band actually carries the ther-
mal flux Hirr out of the atmosphere. This depends strongly
whether the stellar irradiation is absorbed in the upper or in
the deep atmosphere. If it is deposited in the deep layers of the
planet (i.e.γv << 1), most of the flux is transported by the sec-
ond thermal channel whatever the width of the second channel.
Conversely, when the stellar irradiation is deposited in the upper
atmosphere, most of the flux is carried by the first thermal chan-
nel whatever the width of the first channel. The tipping point,
i.e. when each channel carries half of the flux, is reached when
γv = τ−1
lim. Fig. 10 shows the variations of τlim with the width and
the strength of the two thermal opacity bands. τlim increases with
β but decreases with κ1/κ2. It always corresponds to an optical
depth where the first channel is optically thick and the second is
optically thin.
For large values of γP (i.e. γP > 2), we can approximate the
ratio of the thermal fluxes related to the irradiation by a much
simpler expression:
H1, irr(0)
H2, irr(0)
≈ β√
γP
+
1
+ 1
γ∗
vτlim
1−β√
γP
(100)
As shown in Fig. 9 this expression matches correctly the expres-
sion for the analytical model. Depending on the value of γ∗
vτlim
the expression reduces to:
H1, irr(0)
H2, irr(0)
H2, irr(0)
H1, irr(0)
≈ β√
γP
≈ 1 − β√
γP
∗
vτlim, when γ
+ γ
∗
vτlim < 1
+
1
γ∗
vτlim
, when γ
∗
vτlim > 1
(101a)
(101b)
We now look for a similar expression for the thermal fluxes
resulting from the internal luminosity (Hint). Because the in-
ternal luminosity irradiates the atmosphere from below, the re-
sulting thermal fluxes behave similarly to the irradiated when
γv → 0, thus we have:
H1, int(0)
H2, int(0)
≈ β√
γP
(102)
As γP is always greater than, the internal luminosity is always
transported by channel 2, the channel of lowest opacity.
5.2. The skin temperature
The skin temperature reveals the behavior of the atmosphere at
low optical depths. This is the part of the atmosphere probed
during the transit of an exoplanet in front of its host star and is
therefore of particular importance to interpret the observations.
Figure 7 shows that in the irradiated case non-grey effects always
tend to lower the skin temperature compared to the semi-grey
case. This upper atmospheric cooling is already significant (>
10%) for slightly non-grey opacities (i.e. γP ≈ 2). For larger
values of γP the cooling is stronger, reaching 50% for γP ≈ 10 −
1000. Conversely to the non-irradiated case, the skin temperature
is not only a function of γP but also depends on β, i.e. not only
the mean opacities are relevant but also their actual shape. For
large values of β, when the stellar irradiation is absorbed in the
upper layers of the atmosphere (e.g. γv = 100) the cooling is
more efficient than when the stellar irradiation is absorbed in the
deep layers (e.g. γv = 0.01) whereas for small values of β the
cooling is independent on γv.
The skin temperature results directly from the radiative equi-
librium of the upper atmosphere. Using the boundary condi-
tion (49) in the radiative equlibrium equation (23) evaluated at
τ = 0 we can write:
2γ1H1(0) + 2γ2H2(0) − γ
∗
vHv(0) = γPB(0)
(103)
where the skin temperature is given by T 4
= πB(0)/σ. The
skin temperature, depends on the values of H1(0) and H2(0) and
thus on whether the stellar irradiation is absorbed in the deep
atmosphere or in the upper atmosphere.
skin
5.2.1. Case of a deep absorption of the irradiation flux
When γ∗
vτlim < 1, the stellar irradiation is absorbed in the deep
layers of the atmosphere, where the second thermal band, the
band of lowest opacity, is optically thick. Thus, most of the flux
is transported by the second thermal band and we have H2(0) =
H∞−Hv(0). For large values of γP, using eq. (101a) and eq. (102)
11
V. Parmentier & T. Guillot: A non-grey analytical model for irradiated atmospheres
√
γP/(1 − β) which is always larger
we get γ1H1(0)/γ2H2(0) >
than one. Thus, although most of the flux is in the second thermal
band, it is the first band, the band of highest opacity, that sets the
radiative equilibrium. Neglecting the second term in eq (103)
and calculating H1(0) with eqs. (101a) and (102) we obtain:
√
(cid:32) 2γ1β
√
γP
γP
(cid:33)
This relation differs from the case γ∗
vτlim < 1 as the factor
1/
γP before the irradiation temperatures is replaced by a
factor 1/β. Thus, the skin temperature cannot become arbitrarily
low anymore. However, for large values of γv, the second
term in the parenthesis dominates and the skin temperature
decreases proportionally to 1/
γP, which is faster than in the
case γ∗
vτlim < 1. As an example, in Fig 7, for γv = 100, the skin
temperature decreases much faster when γP increases for large
values of β, i.e. when γvτlim > 1.
√
Physical interpretation. When γvτlim > 1, most of the in-
cident irradiation is absorbed in the upper atmosphere, where
the second channel is optically thin. Therefore it is mainly trans-
ported by the channel of highest opacity: channel 1. Similarly
to the case γ∗
vτlim < 1, the radiative equilibrium at the top of the
atmosphere is set by the channel of highest opacity, the one that
carries most of the thermal flux. Therefore all the flux from the
irradiation contributes to the radiative equilibrium of the upper
layers and the skin temperature cannot cool as much as in the
γ∗
vτlim < 1 case, its lowest value being µ∗T 4
irr/2β. However, for
large values of γv and as long as long γP < γv, T 4
skin decrease
faster than in the case γvτlim > 1. This confines the stratosphere
(i.e.the atmospheric levels with a temperature inversion) around
the τ = τlim level whereas it extends up to τ = 0 in the semi-grey
case (see Figs. 12, 13 and 14 hereafter).
5.3. The deep temperature
The temperature of the deep atmosphere is a fundamental out-
come from radiative transfer models as it reveals the energy ex-
change between the planet and its surroundings. Therefore it is
often used as a boundary condition of planetary interior models.
We define the deep temperature as :
T 4
deep
τ→∞ T(τ)4 − 3T 4
= lim
intτ
(109)
deep
+ 3T 4
Thus, the temperature of the deep atmosphere can be well ap-
intτ between the τ ≈ 1 level
proximated as T(τ)4 = T 4
and the radiative/convective boundary. For irradiated planets, the
deep temperature corresponds to the isothermal zone around τ ≈
1. As seen in Figure 8, it as a complex behavior. For small values
of γv the deep temperature increases compared to the semi-grey
case whenever β becomes large enough; an effect known as the
line blanketing effect in the stellar literature (see Milne 1921;
Chandrasekhar 1935; Hubeny & Lanz 1995, for example). This
effect is always maximum when γ∗
lim (see hereafter Fig. 10).
Conversely, for large values of γ∗
v > 10), the deep atmo-
sphere warms up only for large values of γP (γP > γ2
v) whereas it
becomes cooler than in the semi-grey case for smaller values of
γP, a behavior that was not spotted in previous analytical models.
The deep atmospheric temperature is directly set by the
boundary condition at the top of the atmosphere. From eq. (58),
we see that when τ → ∞ :
τ→∞ B(τ) − 3H∞τ = C1
= lim
v ≈ τ−1
v (i.e. γ∗
T 4
deep
(110)
where C1 is set by the top boundary condition (49) applied on
Jγ(0) (see eq. (52)):
2
H1(0)
γ1
+ 2
H2(0)
γ2
= C1 +
3
γ∗
v
Hv
(111)
Similarly to the skin temperature, the deep temperature de-
pends on H1(0) and H2(0) and depends whether the thermal
flux is transported by the first or by the second thermal chan-
nel, i.e. whether γvτlim is larger or smaller than one.
2γ∗
vτlimγ1
γP
+
γ∗
v
γP
2γ1β
√
γP
γP
H∞ −
+
3γP
B(0) =
B(0) =
(cid:17)−1
Hv(0) (104)
2√
and γ1 ≈ γP/β, the equation becomes:
(cid:112)
2γ∗
(1 − β)
Noting that for large values of γP, τlim ≈ β(1 − β)−1(cid:16)(cid:112)
Hv(0)
µ∗T 4
Replacing the fluxes by their equivalent temperature we get an
expression for the skin temperature valid for γ∗
vτlim < 1 and γP >
2:
2√
γP
H∞ −
+ µ∗T 4
irr
4
2γ∗
(1 − β)
2√
γP
γ∗
v
γP
γ∗
v
γP
T 4
skin
(105)
(cid:112)
v
(106)
T 4
int
3γP
irr
4
γP
+
+
+
3γP
+
=
v
When γ∗
√
vτlim < 1, the first term dominates and the expression
differs by a factor 1/
γP from the semi-grey case (eq. (31)).
Because γP > 1 for non-grey opacities, the skin temperature is
always smaller in the non-grey case than in the grey case, as
shown in Fig. 7.
Physical interpretation. When γ∗
vτlim < 1 most of the irra-
diation is absorbed where both thermal channels are optically
thick. The flux is mainly transported by the channel of lowest
opacity κ2 but only the residual flux transported by the channel
of highest opacity κ1 contributes to the radiative equilibrium at
the top of the atmosphere. Because it represents only a small
part of the total flux, the upper atmospheric temperatures are
smaller than in the semi-grey case. The larger the departure
from the semi-grey opacities, the cooler the skin temperature,
without lower bound.
5.2.2. Case of a shallow absorption of the irradiation flux
When γ∗
vτlim > 1, most of the stellar irradiation is absorbed in the
upper atmosphere, where only the first thermal band is optically
thick. According to. (101a), most of the flux originating from the
irradiation Hirr is carried by the first thermal band, the band of
highest opacity. Conversely, following eq. (102), the internal lu-
minosity is still transported by the second thermal channel, as in
the γvτlim < 1 case. Thus, the radiative equilibrium of the upper
atmosphere is still determined by the channel of highest opac-
ity, channel 1 and the second term of eq. (103) can be neglected.
Conversely to the case γvτlim < 1, the top boundary condition
now reads H1(0) ≈ H1, int − Hv(0). Using eq. (102) to calculate
H1, int and noting that for large values of γP, γP ≈ βγ1, the radia-
tive equilibrium becomes:
2√
γP
H∞ −
(cid:32) 2
B(0) =
Hv(0)
γ∗
v
γP
(107)
(cid:33)
+
β
Replacing the fluxes by their equivalent temperatures we get an
expression for the skin temperature valid for γ∗
vτlim > 1 and γP >
2:
(cid:32) 2
β
(cid:33) µ∗T 4
irr
4
γ∗
v
γP
2√
γP
T 4
int
4
+
+
(108)
T 4
skin
=
12
V. Parmentier & T. Guillot: A non-grey analytical model for irradiated atmospheres
Fig. 7. Contours of the relative difference between the skin tem-
perature in the non-grey model and in the semi-grey model for
different values of γv in function of the width of the lines and
their strength. The non-grey atmosphere is 10% (resp. 50%)
cooler than the semi-grey atmosphere above the blue (resp.
green) lines. The dashed lines are contours of γP. We used
µ∗ = 1/
√
3.
Fig. 8. Contours of the relative difference between the skin tem-
perature in the non-grey model and in the semi-grey model for
different values of γv in function of the width of the lines and
their strength. The non-grey atmosphere is 10% hotter (resp.
cooler) than the semi-grey atmosphere inside the red (resp. blue)
contours. The dashed lines are Contours of γP. We used µ∗ =
1/
√
3.
5.3.1. Case of a deep absorption of the irradiation flux
In the case γvτlim < 1 most of the thermal flux is transported by
the second thermal channel and because γ1 >> γ2 we can write:
2
H2(0)
γ2
≈ C1 +
3
γ∗
v
Hv
(112)
Applying the radiative equilibrium at the top of the atmosphere,
and considering that most of the flux is carried by the second
thermal channel, we get:
(cid:32) 2
γ2
(cid:33)
(113)
Hv(0)
(114)
H2(0) ≈ H∞ − Hv(0)
Thus, we can calculate C1 and obtain :
B(τ) − 3H∞τ ∼
τ→∞
H∞ −
2
γ2
+
3
γ∗
v
Fig. 9. Ratio of the total flux in the two thermal bands in function
of γ∗
vτlim for different β and for γP = 100 given by our analytical
model (plain) and by the approximate expression (100) (dashed).
We used µ∗ = 1/
3 and Tint = 0.
√
Fig. 10. Value of τlim in function of the width of the lines β and
their strength κ1/κ2. The x-axis is in logit scale, where the func-
tion logit is defined as logit(x) = log(x/(1 − x))
For large values of γP and thus large value of γP, γ2 ≈ (1 − β).
Replacing the fluxes by their equivalent temperatures we get an
expression for Tdeep valid for γ∗
T 4
int
vτlim < 1 and γP > 2 :
(115)
deep ≈ 2
T 4
1 − β
+ µ∗T 4
irr
4
+
3
γ∗
v
µ∗T 4
irr
4
This expression differs from the semi-grey value of Guillot
(2010) by a factor 1/(1 − β) multiplying the first term. Thus,
when β → 1, the temperature becomes warmer than in the
semi-grey case, as seen for the small values of γv in Fig. 8.
Physical interpretation. When γ∗
vτlim < 1, most of the flux
from the star is absorbed in the deep atmosphere and is princi-
pally transported by the channel of lowest opacity (channel 2),
even when the width of this channel is smaller than the width
of the first thermal channel. Whenever β → 1, the width of the
second channel decreases. In order to keep transporting most of
13
1001011021031041050.0010.010.10.50.90.990.999κ1/κ2βγv=0.01γv=0.1γv=1γv=10γv=100γv=0.01γv=0.1γv=1γv=10γv=100No coolingModeratecoolingStrong cooling Tskin -10% -50%γp=2γp=10γp=100γp=10001001011021031041050.0010.010.10.50.90.990.999κ1/κ2β Tdeep +10% -10%γp=2γp=10γp=100γp=1000γv=0.01γv=0.1γv=1γv=10γv=10γv=100CoolingHeating10-310-210-110010110210310-410-310-210-1100101102103104H1(0) / H2(0)γv*τlimβ=0.01β=0.1β=0.5β=0.9β=0.99FullApprox.1001011021031041050.0010.010.10.50.90.990.999κ1/κ2βτlim10-410-310-210-1100101102 V. Parmentier & T. Guillot: A non-grey analytical model for irradiated atmospheres
the thermal flux, the flux per wavelength in the second channel
must increase. This increases the temperature where the second
channel is optically thick, i.e. in the deep atmosphere. This is
equivalent to the line blanketing effect well studied in stars (see
Milne 1921; Chandrasekhar 1935; Hubeny & Lanz 1995, for
example).
5.3.2. Case of a shallow absorption of the irradiation flux
When γ∗
vτlim > 1, we have H1, irr(0) >> H2, irr(0). Moreover, us-
√
ing eq. (101b) we can show that (H2, irr(0)/γ2)/(H1, irr(0)/γ1) >
γP/β which is larger than 1. Thus eq. (112) remains valid.
However, conversely to the case γ∗
vτlim < 1, the top boundary
condition now reads :
H1(0) ≈ −Hv(0) + H2, int
H2(0) ≈ H∞ + H2, irr
(116)
1 − β√
Where H2, irr is given by eq. (101b) and H1, int by eq. (102). This
leads to:
2
γ2
C1 =
Hv(0) (117)
Again, for large values of γP, γ2 → 1−β and replacing the fluxes
by their equivalent temperatures we get an expression for Tdeep
valid for γ∗
(H∞ − Hv(0))−
Hv(0)− 3
γv
2
γ2γ∗
vτlim
γP
(cid:33) µ∗T 4
irr
vτlim > 1 and γP > 2
µ∗T 4
4
2
1 − β
T 4
int
4
2√
γP
+
irr
+
(cid:32) 3
+
2
1 − β
1
γ∗
vτlim
T 4
deep
=
γv
4
(118)
When γ∗
vτlim >> 1, the contribution to the deep temperature of
√
the irradiation temperature becomes inversely proportional to
γP. As γP > 1, the deep temperature is smaller in the non-grey
case than in the semi-grey case. This is illustrated by the cases
vτlim → 1, the term in
γv = 10 and γv = 100 of Fig. 8. When γ∗
√
γP becomes very small compared to the term in 1/(1 − β)
1/
and the expression converges toward equation eq. (115), valid
for γ∗
vτlim < 1.
interpretation. When γ∗
vτlim >> 1,
Physical
the incident
irradiation is absorbed in the upper atmosphere, where only the
channel of highest opacity is optically thick. Thus, the channel
of highest opacity κ1 transports all the energy and radiates it
directly to space. The incident irradiation is not transported to
the deep atmosphere, leading to a cooler deep atmosphere.
5.4. Outgoing flux
During secondary eclipse observations, the flux emitted by the
planet can be observed in different bands (e.g. Seager & Deming
2010). The detection of molecular species in the emission spec-
trum of an exoplanet depends strongly on the flux contrast be-
tween the continuum and the molecular band considered which
depends itself on the temperature profile. Figure 11 shows the
= 4πH1(0)/β)
flux per wavelength emitted in the first band (Fν1
over the flux per wavelength emitted in the second band (Fν2
=
4πH2(0)/(1 − β)). This would be the expected contrast in the
emission spectrum of the planet between the spectral features
and the continuum. For a non-irradiated atmosphere and for
small values of γv this is a monotonic function of the opacity ra-
tio κ1/κ2. The flux in the band of lowest opacity is always bigger
than the flux in the band of highest opacity i.e. we see absorp-
tion bands. For large values of γv, whenever a strong inversion
14
Fig. 11. Ratio of the monochromatic flux in the two bands
= βH2(0)/(1 − β)H1(0) in function of the opacity ratio
Fν2 /Fν1
κ1/κ2 for different bandwidth, β and visible to infrared opacities,
γv. We used µ∗ = 1/
√
3
happens, the absorption bands turn into emission bands. In any
case, for large values of κ1/κ2 we have:
(cid:32)
(cid:33)1/2
∝
Fν2
Fν1
κ1
κ2
(119)
6. Resulting temperature profiles
No matter how strong the non-greyness of the opacities is, there
is always a region, at high enough optical depth, where the non-
grey solution converges toward the grey solution (see Fig. 4 in
the non-irradiated case). The transition between a regime where
the grey model is accurate to a regime where the non-grey ef-
fects are of primordial importance is set by the parameter τlim.
For optical depths lower than τlim, non-grey effects are always
important, whereas for optical depth higher than τlim, non-grey
effects are present only if γvτlim < 1 and β → 1. Three distinct
situations can be observed on Fig. 10. For narrow lines (β < 0.1),
τlim is always smaller than one, for larger lines (0.1 < β < 0.9),
τlim is close to one whereas for inverted lines (0.9 < β < 1), τlim
can reach much bigger values. Thus, when γv >> 1, few non-
grey effects are expected in the deep atmosphere, contrary to the
cases γv ≈ 1 and γv << 1.
In the case of narrow lines (β < 0.1), only the non-grey cool-
ing of the upper atmosphere is effective. As shown in Fig. 12,
the profile remains close to the semi-grey model at large opti-
cal depth. However at low optical depth, for τ < τlim, the at-
mosphere can be much cooler than in the semi-grey case (case
R = 1). In particular, in the γv = 10 case, the non-grey cooling
localize the temperature inversion to a specific layer, contrary to
the semi-grey case where it extends to the top of the atmosphere.
The envelope of all the profiles (shaded area) is much wider than
in the semi-grey case (see Fig.1).
In the case of large lines or molecular bands (0.1 < β < 0.9)
shown in Fig. 13, both the non-grey cooling of the upper at-
mosphere and the blanketing effect are important. Whereas the
upper atmosphere undergoes an efficient cooling, the lower at-
mosphere (τ > 1) can experience a significant warming via the
blanketing effect. Lowering the ability of the deep atmosphere to
cool down efficiently can affect significantly the evolution of the
10-1100101102103100101102103104105Fν2/Fν1κ1/κ2γv=10γv=1γv=0.1No irr.β=0.5β=0.01 V. Parmentier & T. Guillot: A non-grey analytical model for irradiated atmospheres
planet (Parmentier & Guillot 2011; Budaj et al. 2012; Spiegel
& Burrows 2013; Rauscher & Showman 2013) and could con-
tribute to the radius anomaly of hot-Jupiters (e.g. Guillot &
Showman 2002; Laughlin et al. 2011). Whenever γvτlim ≈ 1
the stellar irradiation is deposited at a level where non-grey ef-
fects lower the ability of the atmosphere to cool down efficiently.
This leads to an efficient and localized warming causing a tem-
perature inversion in the profile at τ ≈ 1/γ∗
v, even when none is
expected from the semi-grey model (i.e. even when γ∗
v < 1). This
happens, for example, when β ≈ 0.5 for γv = 10, when β ≈ 0.9
for γv = 1 and for β ≈ 0.99 for γv = 0.1 (see Fig. 14).
In the case of inverted lines, (β > 0.9), shown in Fig. 14, both
the upper temperature and the deep temperature are affected by
the non-grey effects. The upper atmosphere cools significantly
compared to the semi-grey case. The deep atmosphere can either
warm up due to the blanketing effect but, for large values of γv it
becomes cooler than in the semi-grey case (see the case γv = 10
and R = 100 of Fig. 14). Temperatures as cool as 0.5Teff, µ∗ can
be reached. This is fundamentally different from the semi-grey
case where the deep temperature is always larger than 21/4Teff, µ∗
(see Fig. 3).
As β increases, τlim increases and the blanketing effect disap-
pear. Eventually, when β → 1, the opacities, and thus the profile,
become semi-grey again.
In any case, our irradiated picket-fence model can reach the
whole temperature range span by the numerical models (see the
shaded area in Figs. 12 to 14). Our model should therefore be
preferred to classical semi-grey models as an approximate solu-
tion for the temperature profile of irradiated atmospheres.
√
Fig. 13. PT profiles for an irradiated planet (Tint = Tirr/10 and
µ∗ = 1/
3). The shaded area show the full range of parameters
0.1 < β < 0.9, 1 < R < 104 and 0.01 < γv < 100. The lines are
profiles obtained for β = 0.5 and R = 1 (plain lines), R = 100
(dashed lines), R = 104 (dotted lines) and for γv = 0.1 (blue),
γv = 1 (green) and γv = 10 (red).
√
Fig. 12. PT profiles for an irradiated planet (Tint = Tirr/10 and
µ∗ = 1/
3). The shaded area show the full range of parameters
10−3 < β < 10−1, 1 < R < 104 and 0.01 < γv < 100. The lines
are profiles obtained for β = 0.1 and R = 1 (plain lines), R = 100
(dashed lines), R = 104 (dotted lines) and for γv = 0.1 (blue),
γv = 1 (green) and γv = 10 (red).
7. Conclusion
We derived an analytic non-grey model to approximate the struc-
ture of a plane-parallel irradiated planetary atmosphere. Our
√
Fig. 14. PT profiles for an irradiated planet (Tint = Tirr/10 and
µ∗ = 1/
3). The shaded area show the full range of parameters
10−3 < 1 − β < 10−1, 1 < R < 104 and 0.01 < γv < 100. The
lines are profiles obtained for β = 0.9 and R = 1 (plain lines),
R = 100 (dashed lines), R = 104 (dotted lines) and for γv = 0.1
(blue), γv = 1 (green) and γv = 10 (red).
model includes non-grey effects in the form of a comb line-
opacity function. It is parametrized by γv, the ratio of the vis-
ible to the infrared Rosseland mean opacities, γP the ratio of the
Planck to the Rosseland mean thermal opacities and β, the width
of the lines. The model is valid for any functional form of the
Rosseland mean opacities, the ones obtained from an opacity ta-
ble for example. However, it cannot account for both realistic
Rosseland mean and Planck mean opacities. Their ratio, γP and
the width of the lines, β, must be held constant through the at-
15
10-610-410-2100102104106 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3Optical depth τT/Teff,µ*γv=0.1γv=1 γv=10 Semi-greyκ1/κ2=102κ1/κ2=104β=0.110-610-410-2100102104106 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3Optical depth τT/Teff,µ*γv=0.1γv=1 γv=10 Semi-greyκ1/κ2=102κ1/κ2=104β=0.510-610-410-2100102104106 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3Optical depth τT/Teff,µ*γv=0.1γv=1 γv=10 Semi-greyκ1/κ2=102κ1/κ2=104β=0.9 V. Parmentier & T. Guillot: A non-grey analytical model for irradiated atmospheres
mosphere. Although the model is limited to two thermal opacity
bands, it can take into account any number of visible opacity
bands, each band adding two new parameters, the strength of the
band γvi and its width βvi.
Our model solves the inability of previous analytical mod-
els to reach temperatures as cold as predicted by the numerical
calculations. For opacities dominated by strong and narrow lines
(β < 0.1), non-grey opacities lead to a colder upper atmosphere
but converge toward the grey model at optical depth greater than
τlim. For opacities dominated by wide lines, or "bands" (β ≈ 0.5),
non-grey opacities still allow the upper atmosphere to cool down
more efficiently but also inhibit the cooling of the lower atmo-
sphere. In that case, a significant warming of the lower atmo-
sphere can happen, down to optical depth much greater than τlim.
This planetary blanketing effect could contribute to the radius
anomaly of hot-Jupiters.
Temperature inversions that were not predicted by previous
analytical models occur whenever γvτlim ≈ 1 due to the interac-
tion between the incoming stellar irradiation and the non-grey
thermal opacities. These could have interesting observational
consequences.
Finally, our model allows for a much greater range of tem-
perature profiles than other solutions of the radiative trans-
fer equations for irradiated atmospheres. We encourage the
community to use it when fast calculations of atmospheric
temperature profiles are needed. Given the apparent complex-
ity of the solution, a code is available on the internet (see
ww.oca.eu/parmentier/nongrey).
Acknowledgements
This work was performed in part thanks to a joint Fullbright
Fellowship to V.P. and T.G. The whole project would not have
been possible without the help and support of Douglas Lin. We
also acknowledge Jonathan Fortney and Mark Marley for many
useful discussions, and the University of California Santa Cruz
for hosting us while this work was carried out.
16
Symbol
Quantity
Definition
Units
κR
κP
κ1
κ2
β
κv
τ
R
γ1, γ2,
γP, γv
τlim
ν
µ
Iµν
Jν, Hν,
Kν
4πH∞ =
σT 4
int
σT 4
sub
Rosseland mean opacities
Planck mean opacities
Opacity in the first band
Opacity in the second band
Relative width of the first
band
Opacity in the visible
Rosseland optical depth
Opacity ratio κ1/κ2
κ1/κR, κ2/κR, κP/κR, κv/κR
Limit optical depth
Frequency
cosine of the direction
angle θ
Specific intensity at
frequency ν and in the
direction µ
First, second and third
momentum of the specific
intensity
Internal flux from the
planet
Stellar flux arriving at the
substellar point of the
planet
4πHv(0) =
σT 4
irr
Stellar flux that penetrates
the modeled atmospheric
column
Teff
Teff, µ∗
Tskin
Tdeep
Effective temperature of
the planet
Effective temperature of
the modeled atmosphere
Temperature at optical
depth of zero.
Temperature at large
optical depth.
eq. (2)
eq. (5)
eq. (8)
eq. (8)
eq. (9)
eq. (7)
eq. (3)
sec.3.4
eqs (6) &
(7)
eq. (15)
−
−
m2/kg
m2/kg
m2/kg
m2/kg
−
m2/kg
−
−
−
Hz
Hz
−
Chandrasekhar
(1960)
W/m2/Hz/sr
eq. (20)
W/m2/Hz
−
−
−
−
−
−
eq. (109)
W/m2
W/m2
W/m2
K
K
K
K
Table 2. Main quantities used in this paper.
References
Avrett, E. H. & Krook, M. 1963, ApJ, 137, 874
Budaj, J., Hubeny, I., & Burrows, A. 2012, A&A, 537, A115
Burrows, A., Hubeny, I., Budaj, J., Knutson, H. A., & Charbonneau, D. 2007,
ApJ, 668, L171
Chandrasekhar, S. 1935, MNRAS, 96, 21
Chandrasekhar, S. 1960, Radiative transfer
Chevallier, L., Pelkowski, J., & Rutily, B. 2007, J. Quant. Spec. Radiat. Transf.,
Eddington, A. S. 1916, MNRAS, 77, 16
Fortney, J. J., Lodders, K., Marley, M. S., & Freedman, R. S. 2008, ApJ, 678,
104, 357
1419
Guillot, T. 2010, A&A, 520, A27+
Guillot, T. & Havel, M. 2011, A&A, 527, A20
Guillot, T. & Showman, A. P. 2002, A&A, 385, 156
Hansen, B. M. S. 2008, ApJS, 179, 484
V. Parmentier & T. Guillot: A non-grey analytical model for irradiated atmospheres
Heng, K., Hayek, W., Pont, F., & Sing, D. K. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 20
Heng, K., Menou, K., & Phillipps, P. J. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 2380
Hubeny, I., Burrows, A., & Sudarsky, D. 2003, ApJ, 594, 1011
Hubeny, I. & Lanz, T. 1995, ApJ, 439, 875
King, I. J. I. F. 1955, ApJ, 121, 711
King, J. I. F. 1956, ApJ, 124, 272
Krook, M. 1963, ApJ, 137, 863
Laughlin, G., Crismani, M., & Adams, F. C. 2011, ApJ, 729, L7+
Madhusudhan, N. & Seager, S. 2009, ApJ, 707, 24
Matsui, T. & Abe, Y. 1986, Nature, 322, 526
Meador, W. E. & Weaver, W. R. 1980, Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 37, 630
Mihalas, D. 1978, Stellar atmospheres /2nd edition/
Mihalas, D. & Mihalas, B. W. 1984, Foundations of radiation hydrodynamics
Miller-Ricci, E. & Fortney, J. J. 2010, ApJ, 716, L74
Milne, E. A. 1921, MNRAS, 81, 510
Mordasini, C., Alibert, Y., Georgy, C., et al. 2012a, A&A, 547, A112
Mordasini, C., Alibert, Y., Klahr, H., & Henning, T. 2012b, A&A, 547, A111
Munch, G. 1946, ApJ, 104, 87
Parmentier, V. & Guillot, T. 2011, in EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2011, 1367
Pierrehumbert, R. T. 2010, Principles of Planetary Climate
Pujol, T. & North, G. R. 2003, Tellus A, 55, 328
Rauscher, E. & Menou, K. 2013, ApJ, 764, 103
Rauscher, E. & Showman, A. P. 2013, ArXiv e-prints
Robinson, T. D. & Catling, D. C. 2012, ApJ, 757, 104
Rutily, B., Chevallier, L.,
J., & Bergeat,
Pelkowski,
J.
2008,
J. Quant. Spec. Radiat. Transf., 109, 28
Saumon, D., Hubbard, W. B., Burrows, A., et al. 1996, ApJ, 460, 993
Seager, S. & Deming, D. 2010, ARA&A, 48, 631
Shaviv, N. J., Shaviv, G., & Wehrse, R. 2011, Icarus, 216, 403
Showman, A. P., Fortney, J. J., Lian, Y., et al. 2009, ApJ, 699, 564
Spiegel, D. S. & Burrows, A. 2013, ArXiv e-prints
Unno, W. & Yamashita, Y. 1960, PASJ, 12, 157
Weaver, C. P. & Ramanathan, V. 1995, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 11585
17
|
1706.05458 | 1 | 1706 | 2017-06-17T00:19:30 | An Investigation into Exoplanet Transits and Uncertainties | [
"astro-ph.EP",
"astro-ph.SR"
] | A simple transit model is described along with tests of this model against published results for 4 exoplanet systems (Kepler-1, 2, 8, and 77). Data from the Kepler mission are used. The Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method is applied to obtain realistic error estimates. Optimization of limb darkening coefficients is subject to data quality. It is more likely for MCMC to derive an empirical limb darkening coefficient for light curves with S/N (signal to noise) above 15. Finally, the model is applied to Kepler data for 4 Kepler candidate systems (KOI 760.01, 767.01, 802.01, and 824.01) with previously unpublished results. Error estimates for these systems are obtained via the MCMC method. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph |
An Investigation into Exoplanet Transits and Uncertainties
Y. Ji1
and
T. Banks2
and
E. Budding3,4,5,6
and
M. D. Rhodes7
Received
;
accepted
1Munich Re, 20 Collyer Quay #13-01, Singapore 049319
2Nielsen, Data Science, 47 Scotts Rd #13-00, Singapore 228233
3University of Canakkale, TR 17020, Turkey;
4Dept. Physics & Astronomy, UoC, New Zealand.
5SCPS, Victoria University of Wellington and
6Carter Observatory
7BYU, Provo, Utah
– 2 –
ABSTRACT
A simple transit model is described along with tests of this model against
published results for 4 exoplanet systems (Kepler-1, 2, 8, and 77). Data from
the Kepler mission are used. The Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method
is applied to obtain realistic error estimates. Optimisation of limb darkening
coefficients is subject to data quality. It is more likely for MCMC to derive an
empirical limb darkening coefficient for light curves with S/N (signal to noise)
above 15. Finally, the model is applied to Kepler data for 4 Kepler candidate
systems (KOI 760.01, 767.01, 802.01, and 824.01) with previously unpublished
results. Error estimates for these systems are obtained via the MCMC method.
Subject headings: optimisation; exoplanets; light curve analysis
– 3 –
1.
Introduction
The last two decades have seen an explosion in the number of planets confirmed to
orbit stars other than the Sun (see Pollacco et al. (2006) and Rice (2014) for reviews).
To date, the transit method has been the leading technique for exoplanet detection, with
the Kepler mission being the major contributor to the transit detections. The scientific
aims of the Kepler mission were presented by Borucki et al. (2003), while Borucki et al.
(2011) gave an early summary of results. This has been updated by Rowe et al. (2014),
Mulally et al. (2015) and others. Although Kepler revolutionised the science of exoplanet
transits, it is worth noting that other space missions have also strongly contributed to the
field, for instance, the first transiting exoplanet detection using a space-based observatory
was by CoRot (Moutou et al., 2013). We note with anticipation the upcoming Transiting
Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) mission (Ricker et al., 2010).
The Kepler Science Center has managed the organization of data for scien-
tific users, such data being readily available from the NASA Exoplanet Archive
(http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/ being the "NEA Website" or NEA; see also
Akeson et al., 2013). Data collected by Kepler and other exoplanet research projects are
generally available to researchers and the public. This paper made use of data from one
such online resource: the NEA, which also provides tools to manipulate these data as well
as summary tables from previous analyses. We have been interested to investigate the
uncertainties of parameter estimation for fits to the Kepler photometric data, in particular
the transit regions of light curves. We believe it should be standard practice to state clearly
uncertainties of light curve models or fits and how uncertainties are estimated, giving
indications of the reliability of the estimates. This gains importance as research moves from
the study of individual systems to population analysis.
The approach followed in this study is as follows:
– 4 –
• We decided to start with first principles and build up a model, so that we clearly
understood the fitting function being applied. This was a simple model for
single-planet systems in circular orbits, which was then fitted to folded and binned
individual light curves for 4 systems with published parameter sets. We applied five
different optimisation techniques, to see if they settle in the same vicinity of the
solution space. If such fits, or validation tests, fall close to the published results for
a system, then this should lend some confidence that our model was implemented
correctly. However, optimisation techniques generally provide point estimates for
fitted parameters, without clear indications of the quality of those estimates.
• To explore the scatter in the fits, we next fitted the model to multiple transits per
system, and studied the variability of the derived solutions. We expected to see
some variations caused by effects such as star spots passing over the star's earthward
hemisphere or perhaps micro-pulsations. Model fits would be 'disturbed' by any such
non-modelled effects.
• A more rigorous approach was then taken to explore the determinacy of the model
fits: Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. A Markov Chain is a random
process where an object can move from one state to another with some underlying
probability. We constructed a Markov Chain to find its stationary distribution,
containing the estimates of transit parameters. Details on MCMC can be found in
Brooks et al. (2011). We performed MCMC on data binned across many planetary
orbits (reducing the noise and hopefully removing short term non-modelled effects),
comparing the derived distributions with the previous results for each system. Again,
we validated our fits with those from the literature. Results from this step were
compared with those from earlier steps to check for consistency, and lend confidence
that we had implemented MCMC correctly.
– 5 –
• Finally we fitted five systems marked as "candidates" in the NEA, which had no
published parameters at the time of the project.
We were particularly interested in comparison with the algebraic model of Budding
(see Budding et al., 2016a, for background on this methodology) and the parameter
'uncertainties' this method provides, particularly in light of the lower computing loads
compared to MCMC methods.
A subtle point we note here that the data itself – regardless of other physical effects,
such as star-spots – is affected by 'Poissonian' noise relating to the distribution of arrival
times of bunches of photons. Our approach is to regard all non-modelled effects as 'noise',
but the problem is that systematic physical effects are different at different times, and so
treating them as another kind of 'white' noise may detract from the determinacy of the
data.
2. Analysis
2.1. The model
We decided to build from 'first principles' a simple model of how the combined light
of a single planet orbiting its host star would vary with time. A simple light curve model
was built using the following parameters: the ratio of the host star's radius to the planet's
orbital radius r1, the ratio of the planet radius to the stellar radius k, the orbital inclination
i, the planet's geometric albedo A, and a linear limb darkening coefficient u. The ratio of
the planet's apparent disk to that of its host star is the key driver of transit depth, while
inclination (or the angle of the planetary orbit relative to our line of sight) indicates the
path taken by the planet across the stellar disk, and is a factor in the duration of the
transit. The geometric albedo was used to model the amount of light from the host star
– 6 –
reflected by the planet. As the planet orbits about its star, it exhibits phases as 'seen'
from Earth, varying the amount of light reflected in our direction and hence the flux of the
combined system of star and planet (reflection effects). Two additional parameters were
the phase offset and stellar luminosity. Phase offset allowed the phase of the transit to
shift in orbital phase to a best fit (a shift on the 'time' axis of the light curve), while the
stellar luminosity allowed gross fitting on the 'vertical' axis (or flux)
The transit formulae of Mandel & Agol (2002) were employed, with the projected
distance d between the centres of the stellar and planetary discs taken from page 258 of
Budding & Demircan (2007). The reflection effect calculations were based on Sobolev (1975)
and Charbonneau et al. (1999). We assumed that the transiting planet was small compared
to its host star, and so did not take fully into account the gradient in the stellar brightening
with radius when calculating the stellar brightness blocked by the planet during transit.
We instead assumed that the obscured light across the portion of the stellar disc obscured
by the planet all had the same brightness as that blocked by the centre of the planetary
disc. This assumption is often called the "small planet approximation" in the literature
(see, e.g., Nutzman et al., 2009). Inclination i follows the usual convention adopted by
eclipsing binary light curve models, i.e., when i = 90◦ the planet's orbital plane is in line
with our line of sight. Eccentric orbits were not included into the model. This, along with
additional limb darkening models and removal of the "small planet" approximation, are
planned in further work. We refer the reader to the discussion of Budding et al.
(2016a)
on the complexity of limb darkening models and the information content of the modelled
data, and also to the work below in this paper where a quadratic limb darkening model was
included into fitting.
– 7 –
System
Parameters nlsLM GA
PSO
SA
ILOT
NEA
Kepler 1b
...
...
...
Kepler 2b
...
...
...
Kepler 8b
...
...
...
Kepler 77b
...
...
...
k
r1
u
i
k
r1
u
i
k
r1
u
i
k
r1
u
i
0.125
0.125
0.126
0.125
0.123
0.122
0.123
0.123
0.1275 ± 0.0007
0.122 ± 0.002
-
0.584
0.587
0.590
-
84.086
84.113
84.111
84.105
0.077
0.078
0.077
0.078
0.235
0.238
0.236
0.236
84.3 ± 0.2
0.0761 ± 0.0002
0.2155 ± 0.0003
-
-
-
0.456
-
83.928
83.721
83.917
83.641
0.096
0.095
0.097
0.097
0.148
0.144
0.149
0.149
87.2 ± 0.5
0.0972 ± 0.0008
0.146 ± 0.002
-
-
0.527
0.512
-
83.730
84.040
83.712
83.704
0.101
0.099
0.101
0.102
0.114
0.107
0.113
0.149
84.0 ± 0.4
0.1081 ± 0.0002
0.147 ± 0.008
-
-
0.556
0.512
0.600
86.459
87.306
86.651
83.704
83.59 ± 0.06
0.12539
0.126
0.56
83.872
0.077524
0.2407
0.51
83.14
0.095751
0.1459
0.52
83.978
0.099241
0.1024
0.505
87.998
Table 1: Estimated physical parameters for Kepler 1b, 2b, 8b, and 77b based on a single
transit (see text) for each system. i is in units of degrees. ILOT is the Information Limit
Optimisation Technique of Budding, nlsLM is the Levenberq-Marquardt method, GA the
genetic algorithm, PSO particle swarm optimisation, SA simulated annealing, and NEA are
the NASA Exoplanet Archive published values. In the absence of error estimates we give
our results to three decimal places
– 8 –
2.2.
Initial tests
A number of tests were made of the model. The first set concerned whether we could
recover the input parameters of the model using standard optimisation techniques. The
model was used to generate simulated light curves, to which Gaussian noise was applied (at
the 3% to 0.0003% levels in powers of 10). This noise is defined as the standard deviation
of the flux due to the host star by itself (i.e., outside transits and not including interaction
effects such as the reflection effect). We used the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm for these
initial tests, which is a combination of gradient descent and the Gauss-Newton algorithms.
This is implemented as the nlsLM function in the R minpack.lm package (Elzhov et
al., 2016). The R statistical programming environment (R Core Team, 2014) was used
throughout this project (R is available from https://www.r-project.org). No successful
solutions were found at the 3% noise level, but by 0.3% solutions were being found. By
the time noise was at 0.03% the derived parameters for the radii, orbital distance, and
inclination were effectively the same the input values. Limb darkening had to be fixed in
most runs, as nlsLM was not able to settle on reasonable estimates even for linear limb
darkening co-efficients. The published noise level for the Kepler data is of the order 0.03%
(see later for noise levels in the modelled data), lending confidence that we would be able
derive appropriate estimates. Of course, this is a 'rule of thumb' as the relative scatter in
the light curves will be different for different systems depending on their brightness (stellar
magnitude).
Having established that we could recover the input parameters from data sets based
on the model combined with noise, we moved on to fit NEA data for the well-known cases
of Kepler 1b TrES-2b (using Kepler data collection quarter 1), Kepler 2b HAT-P-7b (Qtr
2), Kepler 8b (Qtr 2), and Kepler 77b (Qtr 5). We used only a subset of the full data
available for these systems, as we were following an iterative approach to our analysis. No
– 9 –
System
Variable Median
95% Interval
ILOT mean ± 4 std.err.
Kepler 1b
...
...
Kepler 2b
...
...
Kepler 8b
...
...
Kepler 77b
...
...
k
r1
i
k
r1
i
k
r1
i
k
r1
i
0.125
(0.124, 0.125)
(0.125, 0.130)
0.123
(0.122, 0.124)
(0.114, 0.130)
84.075
(84.015, 84.142)
(83.5, 85.1)
0.077
(0.077, 0.078)
0.075, 0.077)
0.235
(0.233, 0.245)
(0.214, 0.217)
83.835
(83.415, 84.668)
(85.2, 89.2)
0.096
(0.093, 0.104)
(0.094, 0.100)
0.141
(0.131, 0.176)
(0.138, 0.154)
84.384
(83.512, 86.793)
(82.4, 85.6)
0.099
(0.097, 0.103)
(0.100, 0.116)
0.101
(0.097, 0.123)
(0.100, 0.116)
88.064
(86.559, 90.000)
(83.35, 83.83)
Table 2: Summary of estimated parameters of 30 light curves for Kepler 1b, 2b, 8b, and
77b. To ease comparison of the results, a column is given providing the ILOT upper and
lower estimates for 4σ from the previous tables for the systems is given. i is in degrees
– 10 –
doubt the precision of our modelling could be improved with more data, and in later papers
exploring the Kepler transit data we intend to do this. The current paper concerns more
methodological research, rather than intensive studies of particular examples. In a similar
way, Rhodes & Budding (2014) used only single quarter data-sets (on 16 systems) to test
their winfitter technology.
Our object was to see if parameter estimates from our best-fit model would be in
line with the published parameters. Short cadence data sets were folded using the periods
published on the NEA. Data were binned in time by 0.0002 days for transit ingress and
egress, and 0.005 outside these times. 30 consecutive orbits were processed for each system,
with each transit being individually modelled. Orbital period estimates were made via
linear regression on the transit midpoints. Standard errors (in 10−6 days) were 3, 7, 7, 4,
for Kepler 1b, 2b, 8b, and 77b respectively. The NEA published periods fell within the
95% confidence intervals of the fits, so we were comfortable with these NEA estimates, and
continued our use of them.
We also wanted to explore choice of optimisation technique, as nlsLM has been
reported sensitive to starting values, to the point that convergence might not be reached
(see Ford, 2005). We tested the simulated annealing (Betsimas & Tsitsiklis, 1993), genetic
algorithm (see Mitchell, 1998), and particle swarm methods (see Rini et al., 2011) as
implemented in the GenSA (Xiang et al., 2013), genalg (function rbga; Cortez, 2014),
and psoptim (Ciupke, 2016) R libraries. A modelling technique originally developed by
Budding was also tested - the Information Limit Optimisation Technique (ILOT; Banks &
Budding, 1990). ILOT has several interesting points:
• The relatively simple and compact algebraic form of the fitting function, which allows
large regions of the χ2 parameter space to be explored at low computing cost.
• The χ2 Hessian (see, for example, Bevington, 1969) can be simply evaluated in
– 11 –
the vicinity of the derived minimum. Inspecting this matrix, and in particular its
eigenvalues and eigenvectors, gives valuables insights into parameter determinacy and
interdependence.
• The Hessian can be inverted to yield an error matrix. This must be positive definite
if a determinate, "unique" optimal solution is to be evaluated. ILOT considers strict
application of this provision essential to avoiding over-fitting the data.
ILOT uses three different optimisation techniques:
1. Parabolic interpolation for single parameters, in a step by step mode;
2. Parabolic in conjugate directions ("Powel"); and
3. Vector (in all parameters) mode
The program switches between these modes depending on the convergence rate and
user defined limits. ILOT has been applied to a variety of problems, ranging from radial
velocity curves for binary stars (Banks et al., 1990), through chromospherically active stars
and interacting binaries (e.g., Zeilik et al. (1988), Zeilik et al. (1994), to orientations of
spiral galaxies (Banks et al., 1994) and radial luminosity functions (Banks et. al., 1995).
The technique has been applied to the light curves of exoplanets in the implementation
called winfitter (see., e.g., Budding et al., 2016a and 2016b), which we make use of in
this paper.
We were particularly interested to see if the parameter uncertainties provided by ILOT
were reasonable estimates. Published ILOT results (Budding et al., 2016a) were available
for three of the test systems, and we ran ILOT fits for Kepler-77b in this paper. The data
for 77b (used for the ILOT fitting) consisted of the entire available short cadence data from
– 12 –
Kepler (quarters 1 to 17 inclusive), binned down to a thousand uniformly spaced points
(around one orbital cycle).
System
k
r1
u
cos(i)
of f set
U
Kepler 1b
1.0061
1.0055
1.0064
1.0058
Kepler 2b
1.0023
1.0017
1.0006
1.0016
Kepler 8b
1.0062
1.0038
1.0153
1.0031
Kepler 77b
1.0001
1.0004
1.0002
1.0004
KOI 760.01
1.001789
1.003602
1.004035
1.004232
KOI 767.01
1.010862
1.009553
1.003716
1.010511
KOI 802.01
1.001221
1.003294
1.003736
1.003597
KOI 824.01
1.032533
1.026074
1.005429
1.040743
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.000292
1.000518
σ
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Table 3: R of transit parameters for the systems modelled in this paper
We first compared results of the different optimisation methods. Table 1 lists the
results of these fits to one transit (the first in each system's selected dataset). Unless
otherwise noted, only the light curve around the transit was modelled in this paper. The
best fits for all the optimisation techniques are similar for Kepler 1b. Limb darkening was
not an optimised parameter in the ILOT fits, and we noted above that nlsLM struggled
when limb darkening was included into the fitted parameter set. For Kepler 2b, the ILOT
results appeared to be the outlier, with the other techniques agreeing. Results were in
general agreement across the remaining two systems.
We concluded that our model, although simple, was producing parameter estimates
in line with reasonable expectation. The close agreement of the different optimisation
techniques appeared to indicate a simple, fully convex search space around the optima with
no significant local minima acting as 'traps' during the searches. Having gained confidence
– 13 –
that we could model real transit data, and derive optimal parameters in line with those
published on NEA, we moved on to fitting the remaining transits in our data sets with the
intention of examining any scatter in the derived parameters across these fits.
We then continued fitting across the remaining 29 transits in the data sets for each
system, using just the nlsLM method as we had shown it was equivalent to the others
in the tests above. Computing run times with nlsLM were shorter than for the other
methods, and our testing above gave us confidence that it was deriving optimal parameters
in line with those from more CPU-itensive methods. Given the issues fitting u, we kept
this as a fixed parameter (using the NEA values). The optimisation methods that had
provided estimates of u gave results in essential agreement with the NEA estimate, so we
felt the compromise of using nlsLM and fixing u was acceptable for this preliminary look
into the scatter of the derived parameters. At this stage it was not really clear if u could
be estimated from the fitting or not, even for the simple linear model. However, 'ILOT'
philosophy would point to more determinacy for the parameter set if a reasonable value of
u is first selected and that value retained in subsequent fittings.
Table 2 give the results of these fits. In order to compare the interval estimates,
we applied Chebyshev's Inequality to generate ILOT interval estimates. According to
Chebyshev's Inequality, at least 15
16 of the values of any distribution are within four standard
deviations of the mean. We use mean ± four standard deviations as the interval estimates
of ILOT. The ILOT intervals for Kepler 1b are wider than the 95% quantile estimates from
the nlsLM fits. None of the 95% quantile estimates for Kepler-2b over-lapped with the
ILOT intervals, while it was a mix for the remaining two systems.
There was clearly a wide spread in the parameter estimates for the different transit
fits, which could be due to additional effects mentioned above "disturbing" the light curve.
Folding and binning across multiple orbits should reduce the impact of noise and effects
– 14 –
such as quickly evolving spots. Folding and binning across multiple orbits should reduce
the impact of white noise, as they have zero mean and are uncorrelated. However, removing
the impact of correlated noise, i.e. 'red noise', is more difficult. In some cases, where the
red noise has a period in harmony with the folding period, binning may reinforce the red
noise and lead to biasing. Some research teams (e.g., Pont et al., 2006) have conducted
studies in this area and have come up with techniques to eliminate the non-white noise
from data, for example, a wavelet-based whitening filter (see Tenenbaum et al., 2010). No
doubt reducing red noise could improve the precision of fitted parameters, but as our initial
test results were in line with those published on NEA, we did not concentrate on this and
instead proceeded on to the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method.
2.3. MCMC fits
MCMC allows us to construct a Markov process such that the stationary distribution
is the same as our target distribution. Random samples are generated from the process.
After a sufficient number of samples, and with the influence of data, the chain becomes
close enough to the stationary distribution and thus the samples give a good approximation
of the target distribution. This is known as the convergence of MCMC (see Sinharay, 2003).
Several approaches are applied to assess the convergence, including trace plot diagnostic,
auto-correlation function (ACF) plots diagnostic and Gelman-Rubin convergence diagnostic
( R). Trace plot diagnostics are an intuitive approach. We compared the trace plots of
different chains to see if they overlapped with each other. ACF plots present the correlations
among samples and help to indirectly check the convergence of MCMC. For chains with
ACF decaying fast (as lag increases), it takes shorter time for them to explore the whole
sampling space (see Sinharay, 2003)).
– 15 –
The Gelman-Rubin (Gelman & Rubin, 1992) convergence diagnostic ( R), also known
as the Potential Scale Reduction Factor, is defined to be the square root of ratio of posterior
variance over within-sequence variance of the Markov chains, taking sampling variability
into account. Within-sequence variance refers to the variance of random samples within
each Markov chain and between-sequence variance is the variance among different chains.
Putting it another way, the diagnostic evaluates MCMC convergence by comparing the
estimated between-chains and within-chain variances for each model parameter, across
multiple chains being run on the problem. Large differences between these variances
indicate nonconvergence. Posterior variance takes both within-sequence variance and
between-sequence variance into account. MCMC is considered converged when R is
approximately 1. As discussed in Brooks & Gelman (1997), if R is less than 1.2 the chains
are approximately converged (see also section 7.3 of Givens & Hoeting, 2013, and references
within).
Similar to the work in sections above, a stepwise approach was taken. First we
tested two MCMC methods: the RWMH (Random Walk Metropolis Hastings) and HMC
(Hamiltonian Monte Carlo) methods. We used Kepler 93b in this test since Ballard et al.
(2014) has also applied a MCMC method on this system. We could compare our results
with those of the Ballard team. If our results were comparable to that paper's, we could
feel more confident to apply our implementation to other systems. We would then apply
the method to the systems modelled above, and if in good agreement, move on to model
systems that had no published parameters.
The RWMH was implemented using the function rwmetrop from the LearnBayes
R library (Albert, 2014). For a Markov Chain to converge, it has to find the stationary
distribution and explore it rapidly. The RWMH algorithm is able to find the distribution,
but it can take a long time to achieve full convergence due to incoherent exploration. HMC
– 16 –
is a faster method, as it explores the posterior distribution in a coherent manner. It is
more efficient that RWMH when dealing with high dimensional problems with correlated
variables (see Wang, Mohamed & de Freitas, 2013). HMC is implemented by the rstan R
package (Stan Development Team, 2016).
The ACF (auto-correlation function) plots of the RWMH estimates demonstrated
much higher dependence than the HMC samples, indicating that the chains may take a
longer time to achieve full convergence. The runtime for RWMH was approximately double
that for HMC. These results suggest that HMC has better performance in this case than
RWMH for our current case.
We compared the pairwise plots and histograms generated from the RWMH and HMC
runs with those in Ballard et al. The HMC results were more similar to Ballard et al. than
those from RWMH. Considering all these points, we decided to use the HMC method for
the subsequent work.
2.3.1. Known Systems
• Kepler 1b: the autocorrelations for this system decay to zero quickly, suggesting
that the samples are approximately independent. The trace plots demonstrate good
mixing and that the chains are exploring the posterior distribution rapidly. All four
ACFs decay to null quickly and the trace plots agree with each other, therefore we
believe that the chains have converged. All parameters have unimodal distributions
(see Figure 1). Figure 1 was presented in Budding et al. (2016b). Now we have
applied this method to more system. In passing, we note that the correlation plots
for all other systems looked very similar to this chart, so in the sake of space we have
not reproduced the charts in this paper, instead, interested parties may contact the
authors for these additional charts. The correlations plots suggest that k , r1 , u, and
– 17 –
cos(i) have higher correlations than the others. For all four systems, all R statistics
were close to 1 (see Table 3 for convergence statistics and Table 4 for the parameter
results).
• Kepler 2b: The histograms show that the distributions of all parameters are unimodal.
The pairwise correlations plots show that r1 and cos(i) have the strongest relationship,
while the others are less related. All R statistics were close to 1.
• Kepler 8b: Again, all parameters have unimodal distributions. The correlations plots
suggest that the parameters do not have linear relationships. Convergence was good
(see Table 3), but the 95% quantiles are wide, indicating a weak solution.
• Kepler 77b:
is similar to Kepler 8b, with wide quantiles but good convergence
statistics. Gandolfi et al. (2013) present a more detailed MCMC-based analysis than
this paper's, including radial velocity measurements with Kepler photometry. We
note that our paper's error estimates are an order of magnitude larger than those of
Gandolfi et al., for instance they estimate inclination as 88.00 ± 0.11 degrees and the
planet to star radius as 0.09924 ± 0.00026, with error bars being defined to be at the
68% confidence limits. We plan to revisit Kepler 77b with a more sophisticated model
(as discussed above) and see if an improved model leads to a reduction in our error
estimates and towards those of Gandolfi et al.
A feature of the HMC fits is just how large the 95% uncertainties from the fitting
are, reflecting the difficult nature of 'untangling' the various effects we have modelled.
The HMC solutions are generally consistent with the model fits before, but now have
estimates of the parameter reliability, plus we were able to include u as a free parameter
more confidently. Not all the HMC intervals overlap with the intervals constructed from
the multiple light curves analyses. The ILOT 'errors' for Kepler-1 were similar to the
– 18 –
Fig. 1.- Pairwise Correlation Diagram of 7 estimated parameters of Kepler-1b. The
columns correspond to each of the model parameters, as discussed in Section 2.1 ("The
model"), e.g., k is the ratio of the planet radius to the stellar radius, and so on. The
pairwise correlation coefficients are in the upper right boxes, e.g., 0.41 for between r1 and
k. The histograms are the distributions for each of the parameters The lower left (below the
diagonal) plots the joint distribution between two parameters at a time, giving an insight
into the n-dimensional surface being optimised over. The colours correspond to frequency, or
the number of times the MCMC was found in this point. Red corresponds to most frequent,
and is found in the centre of the distributions, with counts falling away from these points.
k0.12720.12770.410.940.10780.10860.620.011.0000050.220.12720.0110.12720.1278r10.630.960.0160.130.0056u0.810.0120.0990.630.670.00870.1078cos_i0.0150.0320.0059delta_phi00.0001-0.0003260.00131.000005U0.00220.12720.12780.630.66-0.000326-0.0003121.8e-052.6e-051.8e-05delta_l – 19 –
uncertainties from HMC. The HMC result for Kepler-2 was quite different from ILOT, just
as ILOT's solution had been different to those of the other optimisation methods tested
at the beginning of this study. HMC also struggled with the Kepler-8 data, giving large
uncertainties, as with Kepler-77. We discuss the effect of lowering signal to noise later in the
paper. There is also the issue of 'chi-squared valleys' or 'local minima' - about which some
optimization methods 'handle' better than others, not getting caught in these secondary
minima. MCMC methods are particularly good at such escapes, although as noted above
we do not appear to have over-parameterised the transit light curve data and therefore
the solution search space appears to be highly convex. The MCMC correlation diagrams
confirm this interpretation, along with the not surprising correlations between the three key
parameters of planetary radii (r1), ratio of the planetary and stellar radii (k) and the limb
darkening (u). These relations with limb darkening somewhat complicated comparisons
with the simpler modelling above, and speaks towards the necessity of the more computing
intensive method of MCMC to properly explore the search space. As we will see with later
systems in this paper, the optima can be more complicated than we expected at this stage
of the study. Offset parameters (in phase and flux) were clearly Gaussian, as was the noise
('delta l' in the correlation charts).
The results for Kepler 8 are quite different to the initial estimates, but within the
estimated uncertainties. The difference could be due to data treatment (e.g., data folding
and binning) as well as the outliers in the multiple light curve results. However, we believe
that the HMC estimates are more accurate, given that we only tested 30 light curves in the
individual fits above.
We considered whether to add more detailed modelling of the limb darkening. A
test was therefore made using a quadratic limb darkening law for Kepler 1b. The limb
darkening coefficients were not well defined (see Table 5 and 6, plus Figure 2). We saw
– 20 –
System
Parameters Point Estimate
95% Interval Estimate
Kepler 1b
...
...
...
...
Kepler 2b
...
...
...
...
Kepler 8b
...
...
...
...
Kepler 77b
...
...
...
...
k
r1
u
i
σ
k
r1
u
i
σ
k
r1
u
i
σ
k
r1
u
i
σ
0.126
0.121
0.638
(0.122, 0.128)
(0.120, 0.122)
(0.555, 0.711)
84.238
(84.110, 84.355)
0.000057
(0.000048, 0.000070)
0.0777
0.236
0.461
83.545
(0.0775, 0.0779)
(0.235, 0.238)
(0.451, 0.472)
(83.293, 83.304)
0.000041
(0.000035, 0.000047)
0.094
0.138
0.658
(0.090, 0.097)
(0.124, 0.156)
(0.399, 0.811)
84.759
(83.082, 86.244)
0.00044
(0.000037, 0.000052)
0.099
0.112
0.558
86.863
0.00073
(0.096, 0.104)
(0.100, 0.123)
(0.378, 0.721)
(85.585, 88.890)
(0.00061, 0.00088)
Table 4: Summary of estimated parameters from HMC for Kepler 1b, 2b, 8b, and 77b
– 21 –
Fig. 2.- Pairwise Correlation Diagram of 8 estimated parameters of Kepler 1b. u1 and u2
are parameters for the quadratic limb darkening model
k0.12750.12900.910.980.00.20.910.91-0.0003240.00170.031.8e-052.6e-050.12600.0730.1275r10.950.920.980.00510.110.077u10.970.920.00230.0390.350.600.0780.00.3u20.840.00350.0650.078cos_i0.00360.0670.10800.073-0.000324delta_phi00.000920.0025U1.0000050.00910.12601.8e-050.350.550.10800.11001.000005delta_l – 22 –
no improvement in going to this model, and so remained with a simple linear model for
the remaining fits. Within ILOT philosophy, including more terms in the l.d. expression
dilutes the determinacy of individual parameters, even when it does not create a general
breakdown of determinacy due to the failure of the Hessian to remain positive definite. And
with that, the higher order terms in that expression are expected to be small, or very small,
in comparison to their errors.
k
r1
u1
u2
cos(i)
of f set U σ
R 1.037882
1.040101
1.048493
1.052874
1.030407
1
1
1
Table 5: R of transit parameters for Kepler 1b with quadratic limb darkening model
Parameters Point Estimate
95% Interval Estimate
k
r1
u1
u2
i
σ
0.1273
0.1276
0.6220
0.0420
83.776
(0.1267, 0.1276)
(0.1274, 0.1281)
(0.5394, 0.6612)
(0.0016, 0.1401)
(83.745, 83.797)
0.00002
(0.00002, 0.00002)
Table 6: Summary of estimated parameters from HMC for Kepler 1b with quadratic limb
darkening model
2.3.2. Candidate Systems
The HMC fits on the known systems gave comparable results to the literature and the
previous fits in this study. We were therefore confident to apply the model to four 'new'
– 23 –
systems without published parameters. These are KOI 760.01, 767.01, 802.01, and 824.01.
We adopted the NEA orbital periods after confirming that the NEA-assigned periods were
reasonable via linear regressions (see Table 7).
The light curves are not as 'clean' as the previous systems modelled. KOI 802.01 and
824.01 have relatively long periods, reducing the number of transits available for modelling.
There were only 5 transits available for 760.01, 30 for 767.01, 11 for 802.01, and 9 for
824.01. We did model these transits separately, but the 'error bars' were large (even r1 for
767.01 had a 95% interval range of 0.103 to 0.222, so we decided to go straight through to
MCMC modelling.
Before discussing the results, we will briefly consider signal to noise. If we compare
transit depth to the noise σ it should be no surprise that the S/N (signal to noise) levels
are lower for the candidate systems. Kepler 1b has a signal to noise ratio of about 252,
2b 164, 8b 22, and 77b 16. By comparison, the S/N for KOI 760.01 is 7, for 767.01 19,
802.01 2.3 , and 824.01 7. We therefore expected wider 'uncertainties' in our results for the
candidate systems, and that our parameters would be best defined for KOI 767.01 of all the
candidate systems.
• KOI 760.01: Table 8 gives the results of these fits, and for the other three candidate
systems. The limb darkening is approximately uniformly distributed, indicating poor
definition. Other parameters have unimodal distributions. Only r1 and cos(i) have a
strong positive correlation. Convergence statistics look good (Table 3) and the chains
appear converged. Limb darkening does not seem to be an optimisable variable for
this data set.
• KOI 767.01: All parameters are unimodal bar cos(i), which is apparently uniformly
distributed. Chains appear well converged.
– 24 –
• KOI 802.01: r1 and u can take any values between 0 and 1, indicating that we can
not optimise these parameters together with the others. This system has a low signal
to noise ratio, so it is not unexpected that modelling will be more problematic.
• KOI 824.01: Similar to KOI 802.01, this system has a low signal to noise ratio.
Parameter u can take any values between 0 and 1, indicating that we can not optimise
it together with the others.
System
Point Estimate Standard Error
95% Interval Estimate
NEA
KOI 760.01
4.9597
KOI 767.01
2.81659
KOI 802.01
19.60
KOI 824.01
15.375
0.0005
0.00009
0.01
0.002
(4.9577, 4.9617)
4.95932
(2.8164, 2.8168)
2.81650
(19.569, 19.627)
19.62035
(15.368, 15.382)
15.37563
Table 7: Summary of estimated periods (in days) for 4 'new' systems
Among the 8 systems, Kepler 1, 2, 8, 77 and KOI 767.01 have S/N above 15. Their
corresponding estimates of limb darkening coefficient u have higher determinacy than the
others, i.e., the error bars are narrower. Therefore, we have estimated the borderline S/N
for limb darkening coefficient to be 15. For noisy data with low S/N, it is preferable to take
the limb darkening coefficient derived from appropriate stellar atmosphere models rather
than derive it from the data.
We note Csizmadia et al. (2013) made a detailed study of the determinability of
limb darkening coefficients. This study created 2000 light curves using the subroutines of
Mandel & Agol (2002), assuming a circular orbit and adding levels of Gaussian noise to give
different levels of signal to noise (S/N). A genetic optimisation method was then applied
to these synthetic light curves, fitting a transit model. Figure 3 of their paper plots the
– 25 –
System
Parameters Point Estimate
95% Interval Estimate
Kepler 760.01
...
...
...
...
Kepler 767.01
...
...
...
...
Kepler 802.01
...
...
...
...
Kepler 824.01
...
...
...
...
k
r1
u
i
σ
k
r1
u
i
σ
k
r1
u
i
σ
k
r1
u
i
σ
0.1066
0.0847
0.722
85.888
0.0008
0.1238
0.1176
0.5234
86.618
0.0005
0.1477
0.0163
0.1478
89.296
0.0062
0.1214
0.0317
0.4517
88.671
0.0032
(0.1001, 0.1120)
(0.7590, 0.0925)
(0.0894, 0.9896)
(85.279, 86.600)
(0.0007, 0.0009)
(0.1226, 0.1250)
(0.1152, 0.1199)
(0.4724, 0.5704)
(86.329, 86.921)
(0.0004, 0.0006)
(0.1456, 0.1499)
(0.0156, 0.0169)
(0.0056, 0.4043)
(89.247 ,89.352)
(0.0060, 0.0064)
(0.1130, 0.1265)
(0.0256, 0.0363)
(0.0428, 0.8618)
(88.299, 89.274)
(0.0030, 0.0033)
Table 8: Summary of estimated parameters from HMC for KOI 760.01, 767.01, 802.01, and
824.01
– 26 –
relative uncertainties in derived parameters, including limb darkening, against S/N. They
note that a S/N of at least 25 and 6 is required to fit quadratic limb darkening coefficients
(i.e., the determinability of the limb darkening coefficients depends on the transit depth
relative to the noise). From this figure, it can be seen that the limb darkening co-efficients
can be derived subject to an approximately 6% precision if the S/N ratio is 15, in line with
the current paper and confirming their results.
We have re-fitted KOI 802.01 (with the lowest S/N) data using 6 parameters, excluding
limb darkening coefficient u. As for u, we have fixed a theoretical value 0.41 determined by
winfitter program. See tables 9 and 10.
All six transit parameters for KOI 802.01 have uniform distribution and the fitted
light curve looks reasonable. According to tables 9 and 10, the 95% interval estimates are
reasonably small for all six parameters and the R are all close to 1, suggesting the Markov
Chain has converged.
Parameters Point Estimate
95% Interval Estimate
k
r1
i
σ
0.1482
0.0158
89.353
0.0062
(0.1457, 0.1508)
(0.0150, 0.0167)
(89.277 ,89.410)
(0.0060, 0.0064)
Table 9: Summary of estimated parameters (excluding u) from HMC for KOI 802.01
k
r1
cos(i)
of f set
U
R 1.000733
1.001587
1.001534
1
0.9999253
σ
1
Table 10: R of transit parameters for KOI 802.01
We referred to the Kepler Candidate Overview page of KOI 802.01 on the NEA website
– 27 –
to check the validity of our fitted results. However, the information in that catalog seem to
be inconsistent. According to the "KOI Transit Results" section, we could derive RStar (of
RSun) by applying Kepler's Third Law. The derived radius is smaller than 0.5R(cid:12), consistent
with our fitted results. On the other hand, in the Stellar Properties section, RStar (in R(cid:12))
is reported as 0.77 to 0.87(!). Similarly, the effective temperature of the star is given as
around 5700 K, which is close to that of the Sun. But for a solar effective temperature, the
derived stellar radius in KOI 802 would be too small for any normal star. These findings
suggest something unusual in the KOI 802.01 identification. It seems possible that the
star identified in the catalog is not the one being eclipsed. Such a scenario might account
for the inconsistency between the radius derived from transit curves and from the basis of
normal stellar structure models. This question supports the need for further investigation
and additional observational data. We confirm this by noting Batalha (2014), who gives
useful information on the NEA catalogues and explains that the Kepler Input Catalog
(KIC, see Brown et al., 2011 for background on this catalog) provided the stellar properties
listed on the site. These are in turn derived from ground-based photometry and modelling.
Batalha notes that the KIC "contains known deficiencies and systematic errors, making it
unsuitable for computing accurate planet properties" and we urge diligence be taken for
stellar parameters case by case, particularly for the fainter and therefore harder to measure
stars (the KIC gives a Kepler magnitude of 15.562 for KOI 802, which can be compared
with the 11.338 for Kepler-1).
3. Conclusions
This paper has described a simple transit model and its application using a variety
of optimisation techniques to fit selected Kepler light curves. The model was first applied
to systems with published parameters, deriving point estimates in good agreement with
– 28 –
the literature. Provided that the information content of the data is respected, the point
estimates were effectively independent of the optimisation method indicating a tidy convex
optimisation problem. The following example might make clear our argument against
overfitting: a sine wave has four meaningful parameters - amplitude, offset, frequency and
a non-zero center amplitude. It is possible to fit additional parameters to a 'noisy' sine
wave data set, but how to interpret these parameters? Such over-fitting the data can cloud
meaningful analysis, and we believe it is extremely important for analysts to keep in mind
the information content of the data in analysis, such as through consideration of S/N and
its impact on determinability.
A key question in this study was whether limb darkening could be derived from the
data sets. We started with a simple linear model, frequently finding indeterminacy when
even linear limb darkening was included as an optimisable parameter. The situation did
not improve when a quadratic model was applied (we had wondered if the linear model
was too much of a simplification and subsequently leading to poor fits), and the MCMC
optimisations showed limb darkening to be poorly defined from the data. However this
test was only one case. Later work will involve trialling different models and investigating
whether statistically robust co-efficients can be derived for Kepler transits (taking note of
Espinoza & Jordan (2015) and Espinoza & Jordan (2016)). The MCMC fits above clearly
showed correlations between limb darkening and a key variable of interest in exoplanets:
the radius of the exoplanet itself. We therefore believe that continued modelling and
exploration of the confidence in limb darkening estimates across different models, systems,
and across different periods (for those systems) is an important task. Exoplanet transit
light curves provide a 'laboratory' for exploration of limb darkening, allowing refinement of
our stellar models (see also Csizmadia et al. , 2013).
Such an investigation will require improvement to the rather simple model used in this
– 29 –
paper, ensuring that we have removed other physics before trying to fit limb darkening
models. We further intend to improve the fitting model, noting the deficiencies described
earlier in the paper such as use of the small planet approximation, and continue our
investigation into the parameter distributions of model fits to the Kepler data.
Such an improved model will also allow better comparison with results from winfitter,
which is a more sophisticated model. The comparisons between winfitter and MCMC in
this paper have, unfortunately, been inconclusive. We have not really been comparing "like
with like". As noted above, winfitter uses an optimized chi-square fit of the light curve
to the physical parameters of the system such as mass, luminosity, period and separation. It
is much faster in computer run times than MCMC, and if it can be shown that its estimates
of the accuracy of parameters are consistent with MCMC, then it would be a useful tool for
parameterising transit light curves, particularly at large scale (i.e., an automated system
running across large data sets of multiple systems). winfitter includes the relevant
proximity effects such as radiative interaction (reflection effects), tidal and rotational
distortions, gravity brightening (ellipticity effects), limb darkening, Doppler beaming effect,
and orbital eccentricity (if present). A further advantage of winfitter is that it also
produces a distortion-wave light curve that is the difference between the observed and
model light curves. This 'difference curve' can then be analyzed by spotfitter, an ILOT
based starspot modeling application, which uses a circular, dark starspot model to find the
latitude, longitude, size and temperature of one or two spot groups on the active primary
star.
We believe that knowledge of such parameter distributions will be important for
any 'meta-analyses' based on collection of many individual and separate studies deriving
exoplanet parameters. This is why we have kept the distribution charts in this paper, and
we encourage other researchers to share their 'uncertainties'. Without a clear understanding
– 30 –
of confidence limits in modelling results, meta-analyses might reach incorrect conclusions
by placing undue weight on 'observations' of dubious confidence or indeed the reverse.
We strongly encourage other researchers in the field to use techniques such as MCMC to
explore the determinacy of their model fit and the confidence that should be placed in the
parameter estimates.
4. Acknowledgements
This research has made use of the NASA Exoplanet Archive, which is operated by
the California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration under the Exoplanet Exploration Program.
It is a
pleasure to acknowledge the additional help and encouragement from the National
University of Singapore, particularly through Prof. Lim Tiong Wee of the Department
of Statistics and Applied Probability. Associate Professor Alex R. Cook and Associate
Professor David Nott provided valuable guidance on the Random Walk Metropolis-
Hastings and Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) applications. winfitter is available at
http://michaelrhodesbyu.weebly.com/astronomy.html
– 31 –
REFERENCES
Akeson, R.L., Chen, X., Ciardi, D., Crane, M., Good, J., Harbut, M., Jackson, E., Kane,
S.R., Laity, A.C., Leifer, S., Lynn, M., McElroy, D. L., Papin, M., Plavchan,
P., Ramirez, S.V., Rey, R., von Braun, K., Wittman, M. , Abajian, M., Ali, B.,
Beichman, C., Beekley, A., Berriman, G.B., Berukoff, S., Bryden, G., Chan, B.,
Groom, S., Lau, C., Payne, A. N., Regelson, M., Saucedo, M., Schmitz, M., &
Stauffer, J., Wyatt, P., & Zhang, A., PASP, 125, 989, 2013
Albert, J., 2014, "LearnBayes: Functions for Learning Bayesian Inference",
https://CRAN.R-project.org/ package=LearnBayes
Ballard, S., et al. (25 authors), 2014, Astrophysical Journal, 790, 12
Banks, T., & Budding, E., 1990, Ap&SS, 167, 221
Banks, T., Sullivan, D.J., & Budding, E., 1990, Ap&SS, 173, 77
Banks, T., Kilmartin, P.M., & Budding, E., 1991, Ap&SS, 183, 309
Banks, T., Dodd, R.J., & Sullivan, D.J., 1994, MNRAS, 272, 821
Banks, T., Sullivan, D.J., & Dodd, R.J., 1995, MNRAS, 274, 1225
Batalha, N. M., 2014, PNAS, 111 (35), 12647
Bertsimas, D., & Tsitsiklis, J., 1993, Statistical Science, 8, 10-15
Bevington, P.R., 1969, Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences,
McGraw-Hill, New York
Borucki, W.J., et al. (14 authors), 2003, in Scientific Frontiers in Research on Extrasolar
Planets, Eds. D. Deming and S. Seager, ASP Conf. Ser. 294, 427
– 32 –
Borucki, W.J., et al. (69 authors), 2011, ApJ, 736, 19
Brooks, S., & Gelman, A., 1997, J. Comput. Graph. Statist, 434
Brooks, S., Gelman, A., Jones, G., & Meng, X., 2011, Handbook of Markov Chain Monte
Carlo, Chapman and Hall, CRC
Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., Everett, M. E., & Esquerdo, G. A., 2011, Ap. J, 142, 112
Budding, E., & Demircan, O., 2007, Introduction to Astronomical Photometry, CUP
Budding, E., Puskullu, C¸ ., Rhodes, M.D., Demircan, O., & Erdem, A., 2016, Ap&SS, 361,
17
Budding, E., Rhodes, M.D., Puskullu, C¸ ., Ji, Y., Erdem, A., & Banks, T., 2016, Ap&SS,
361, 346
Charbonneau, D., Noyes, R.W., Korzennik, S.G., Nisenson, P., Jha, S., Vogt, S.S., &
Kibrick, R.I., 1999, ApJ, 527, 445
Ciupke, K., 2016, "psoptim: Particle Swarm Optimization", https://CRAN.R-
project.org/package=psoptim
Cortez, P., 2014, Modern Optimization with R (1st Edition ed.), Springer, Switzerland.
Csizmadia, Sz., Pasternacki, Th., Dreyer, C., Cabrera, J., Erikson, A., & Rauer, H., 2013,
A&A, 549, A9
Elzhov, T.V., Mullen, K. M., Spiess, A. N, & Bolker, B., 2016, "minpack.lm: R Interface to
the Levenberg-Marquardt Nonlinear Least-Squares Algorithm Found in MINPACK,
Plus Support for Bounds", https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=minpack.lm
Espinoza, N., & Jordan, A., 2015, MNRAS, 450, 1879
– 33 –
Espinoza, N., & Jordan, A., 2016, MNRAS, 457, 3573
Ford, E. B., 2005, AJ, 129, 1706
Gandolfi, D., Parviainen, H., Fridlund, M., Hatzes, A. P., Deeg, H. J., Frasca, A., Lanza,
A.F., Prada Moroni, P. G., Tognelli, E., McQuillan, A., Aigran, S., Alonso, R.,
Antoci, V., Cabrera, J., Carone, L., Csizmadia, Sz., Djupvik, A. A., Guenther, E.W.,
Jessen-Hansen, J., Ofir, A., & Telting, J., 2013, A&A, 557, A74
Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B., 1992, Statistical Science 7, 457
Givens, G.H., & Hoeting, J. A., 2013, Computational Statistics - 2nd Edition', Wiley
Mandel, K., Agol, E., 2002, ApJ, 580, 171
Mitchell, M., 1998, "An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms (Complex Adaptive Systems)",
MIT Press
Moutou, C., Deleuil, M., Guillot, T., Baglin, A., Bord, P., Bouchy, F., Cabrera, J.,
Csizmadia, S., & Deeg, H.J., 2013, Icarus, 226, 1625
Mullally, F., Coughlin, J. L., Thompson, S. E., et al. 2015, ApJS, 217, 31
Nutzman, P., Charbonneau, D., Winn, J. N., Knutson, H.A., Fortney, J.J., Holman, M. J.,
& Agol, E., Ap. J., 692, 229, 2009
Pollacco, D.L., et al. (27 authors), 2006, PASP, 118, 1407
Pont, F., Zucker, S., & Queloz, D., MNRAS, 2006, 373, 231
R Core Team, 2014, R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation
for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Rhodes, M.D., & Budding, E., 2014, ApSS, 351: 451
– 34 –
Rice, K., 2014, Challenges, 5, 296
Ricker, G. R., Latham, D. W., Vanderspek, R. K., Ennico, K. A., Bakos, G., Brown, T.
M., Burgasser, A. J., Charbonneau, D., Clampin, M., Deming, L. D., Doty, J. P.,
Dunham, E. W., Elliot, J. L., Holman, M. J., Ida, S., Jenkins, J. M., Jernigan, J. G.,
Kawai, N., Laughlin, G. P., Lissauer, J. J., Martel, F., Sasselov, D. D., Schingler, R.
H., Seager, S., Torres, G., Udry, S., Villasenor, J. N., Winn, J. N., & Worden, S.
P., American Astronomical Society, AAS Meeting #215, id.450.06; Bulletin of the
American Astronomical Society, Vol. 42, 459
Rini, D.P., Shamsuddin, S.M., & Yuhaniz, S.S., 2011, International Journal of Computer
Applications, 14, 19
Rowe, J. F., Bryson, S. T., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2014, ApJ, 784, 45
Sinharay, S., 2003, Assessing Convergence of the Markov Chain Monte Carlo Algorithm: A
Review, ETS Research Report Series, i-52.
Sobolev, V.V., 1975, Light Scattering in Planetary Atmospheres, Pergamon Press, Oxford
Stan Development Team, 2016, "RStan: the R interface to Stan", http://mc-stan.org/
Tenenbaum, P., Brysona, S. T., Chandrasekarana, H., Jie, L, Quintanaa, E., Twickena, J.
D., & Jenkinsa, J. M., 2010, Proc. SPIE, 7740
Wang, Z., Mohamed, S., & de Freitas, N., 2013, Adaptive Hamiltonian and Riemann
Manifold Monte Carlo Samplers, In: International Conference on Machine Learning
(ICML), JMLR W&CP, 28(3), 1462
Xiang, Y., Gubian, S., Suomela, B., & Hoeng, J., 2013, "Generalized Simulated Annealing
for Efficient Global Optimization: the GenSA Package for R", The R Journal,
Volume 5/1, URL http://journal.r-project.org/
– 35 –
Zeilik, M., DeBlasi, C., Rhodes, M., & Budding, E., 1988, Astrophys. J. 332, 293
Zeilik, M., Gordon, S., Jaderlund, E., Ledlow, M. J., Summers, D. L., Heckert, P. A.,
Budding, E., & Banks, T., 1994, Astrophys. J, 421, 303
This manuscript was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2.
|
1809.04160 | 1 | 1809 | 2018-09-11T21:00:42 | Evidence for a massive dust-trapping vortex connected to spirals: a multi-wavelength analysis of the HD~135344B protoplanetary disk | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | Spiral arms, rings and large scale asymmetries are structures observed in high resolution observations of protoplanetary disks, and it appears that some of the disks showing spiral arms in scattered light also show asymmetries in millimeter-sized dust. HD~135344B is one of these disks. Planets are invoked as the origin of these structures, but no planet has been observed so far. We investigate the nature of the asymmetric structure in the HD~135344B disk in order to understand the origin of the spirals and of the asymmetry seen in this disk. Ultimately, we aim at understanding whether or not one or more planets are needed to explain such structures. We present new ALMA sub-0.1" resolution observations in Band 3 and 4. The high spatial resolution allows us to characterize the mm-dust morphology of the disk. The low optical depth of continuum emission probes the bulk of the dust in vortex. Moreover, we combine the new observations with archival data to perform a multi-wavelength analysis and to obtain information about the dust distribution and properties inside the asymmetry. We resolve the asymmetric disk into a symmetric ring + asymmetric crescent, and observe that: (1) the spectral index strongly decreases at the center of the vortex, consistent with the presence of large grains; (2) for the first time, an azimuthal shift of the peak of the vortex with wavelength is observed; (3) the azimuthal width of the vortex decreases at longer wavelengths, as expected for dust traps. These features allow to confirm the nature of the asymmetry as a vortex. Finally a lower limit to the total mass of the vortex is $0.3 M_{\rm Jupiter}$. Considering the uncertainties involved in this estimate, it is possible that the actual mass of the vortex is higher and possibly within the required values ($\sim 4\,\rm M_{\rm Jupiter}$) to launch spiral arms similar to those observed in scattered light. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. hd13_mw_arxiv
September 13, 2018
c(cid:13)ESO 2018
Evidence for a massive dust-trapping vortex connected to spirals
A multi-wavelength analysis of the HD 135344B protoplanetary disk
P. Cazzoletti1, E. F. van Dishoeck1, 2, P. Pinilla3, M. Tazzari4, S. Facchini1, N. van der Marel5, M. Benisty6, 7, A.
Garufi8, and L. M. Pérez9
8
1
0
2
p
e
S
1
1
.
]
P
E
h
p
-
o
r
t
s
a
[
1
v
0
6
1
4
0
.
9
0
8
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
1 Max-Planck-Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstrasse, 85741 Garching bei München, Germany
e-mail: [email protected]
2 Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, Niels Bohrweg 2, 2333 CA Leiden, The Netherlands
3 Department of Astronomy/Steward Observatory, The University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
4 Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK
5 Herzberg Astronomy & Astrophysics Programs, National Research Council of Canada, 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria BC V9E
2E7, Canada
6 Unidad Mixta Internacional Franco-Chilena de Astronomía (CNRS, UMI 3386), Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de
Chile, Camino El Observatorio 1515, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
7 Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IPAG, 38000 Grenoble, France.
8 INAF, Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo Enrico Fermi 5, I-50125 Firenze, Italy
9 Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Chile, Camino El Observatorio 1515, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
Received September 15, 1996; accepted March 16, 1997
ABSTRACT
Context. Spiral arms, rings and large scale asymmetries are structures observed in high resolution observations of protoplanetary
disks, and it appears that some of the disks showing spiral arms in scattered light also show asymmetries in millimeter-sized dust.
HD 135344B is one of these disks. Planets are invoked as the origin of these structures, but no planet has been observed so far and
upper limits are becoming more stringent with time.
Aims. We want to investigate the nature of the asymmetric structure in the HD 135344B disk in order to understand the origin of the
spirals and of the asymmetry seen in this disk. Ultimately, we aim at understanding whether or not one or more planets are needed to
explain such structures.
Methods. We present new ALMA sub-0.1(cid:48)(cid:48) resolution observations at optically thin wavelengths (λ = 2.8 mm and 1.9 mm) of the
HD 135344B disk. The high spatial resolution allows us to unambiguously characterize the mm-dust morphology of the disk. The low
optical depth of continuum emission probes the bulk of the dust content of the vortex. Moreover, we combine the new observations
with archival data at shorter wavelengths to perform a multi-wavelength analysis and to obtain information about the dust distribution
and properties inside the observed asymmetry.
Results. We resolve the asymmetric disk into a symmetric ring + asymmetric crescent, and observe that: (1) the spectral index
strongly decreases at the center of the vortex, consistent with the presence of large grains; (2) for the first time, an azimuthal shift of
the peak of the vortex with wavelength is observed; (3) the azimuthal width of the vortex decreases at longer wavelengths, as expected
for dust traps. These features allow to confirm the nature of the asymmetry as a vortex. Finally, under the assumption of optically
thin emission, a lower limit to the total mass of the vortex is 0.3MJupiter. Considering the uncertainties involved in this estimate, it is
possible that the actual mass of the vortex is higher and possibly within the required values (∼ 4 MJupiter) to launch spiral arms similar
to those observed in scattered light. If this is the case, no outer planet is needed to explain the morphology.
Key words. protoplanetary disks - planet-disk interaction - planets and satellites: formation - stars: individual (HD 135344B) -
instabilities
1. Introduction
In recent years, as higher angular resolution observations of pro-
toplanetary disks are routinely performed, it is becoming appar-
ent that almost every single disk hosts some structures. Rings
(e.g. Andrews et al. 2016; Isella et al. 2016; Fedele et al. 2018),
cavities and large-scale asymmetries (e.g. Casassus et al. 2013;
van der Marel et al. 2013) and spirals (e.g. Benisty et al. 2015,
2017; Pérez et al. 2016; Follette et al. 2017; Stolker et al. 2016,
2017; Dong et al. 2018) are being observed at mm-wavelength
continuum emission with ALMA and in scattered light in the
near-infrared (NIR) with VLT/SPHERE (Beuzit et al. 2008) and
Gemini/GPI (Macintosh et al. 2008).
Rings and azimuthal asymmetries are often interpreted
as dust traps, i.e. local pressure maxima where dust grains
marginally coupled to the gas remain trapped (Weidenschilling
1977). Such traps have critical implications in planet formation,
since they allow dust particles to grow to large sizes and even-
tually to form planetesimals by preventing them from rapidly
drifting into the central star (Klahr & Henning 1997; Johansen
et al. 2007; Pinilla et al. 2012a,b).
Planets are invoked as a potential origin for pressure bumps,
and can also explain the observed spiral arms as these are the
result of an exchange of angular momentum between the planet
and the material in the disk (e.g. Dong et al. 2015a; Fung &
Dong 2015; Bae et al. 2016; Dong & Fung 2017). Symmetric,
Article number, page 1 of 14
A&A proofs: manuscript no. hd13_mw_arxiv
Fig. 1: Left: ALMA Band 4 observations of HD 135344B at 1.9 mm. The panel in the upper right corner shows a zoom into the
inner regions, with a colormap enhancing the emission from the central point-source. Right: same image with the contours of the
spiral arms observed with SPHERE (Stolker et al. 2017) overlaid in white. Note that the spiral starts near the vortex position. The
white ellipse in the bottom left corner of the left panel shows the beam size.
HD 135344B) are challenging our understanding of the origin of
such structures1.
The wealth of information provided by observations at dif-
ferent wavelengths can now help us to break some of the de-
generacies in the interpretation of the observed morphologies.
In particular, to understand the role of planets in sculpting the
disk morphology and vice versa, to understand the role of struc-
tures in the planet formation process, it is now timely to look for
a common explanation for the different morphologies observed
for grains of different sizes.
In this context, HD 135344B, also known as SAO 206462, is
a particularly interesting object. Located at a distance of 135±1.4
pc (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2016; Lindegren et al. 2018; Luri
et al. 2018; Gaia Collaboration et al. 2018), it is a transition disk
with an inner mm-dust cavity of ∼ 40 au (Brown et al. 2007,
2009; Andrews et al. 2011). In addition, the presence of a deep
13CO and C18O gas cavity whose size is smaller than that of the
dust (van der Marel et al. 2016a) suggests that the inner cavity
observed in the dust could have been carved by a large inner
planet at a radius (cid:46) 30 au from the central star (as also suggested
by e.g. Lyo et al. 2011).
At the same time, this system shows two bright, symmet-
ric spiral arms in scattered light (Muto et al. 2012; Garufi et al.
2013; Stolker et al. 2016, 2017) extending out to ∼ 75 au, that
can be explained either by two planets at 55 and 126 au (Stolker
et al. 2016) or by a single, massive planet outside the dust cavity
at ∼ 100 au (Fung & Dong 2015; Bae et al. 2016; Dong & Fung
2017). However, no planet has yet been observed. Using 0.2(cid:48)(cid:48)
resolution data, van der Marel et al. (2016b) noted that the mm
emission could be due to an inner symmetric ring and an outer
vortex, rather than a single asymmetric ring. They proposed that
the vortex may be triggering one of the observed spiral arms,
1 These upper limits are calculated assuming a hot start scenario; in
the case of a cold start the upper limits could be substantially higher.
Fig. 2: Band 3 observations of HD 135344B at 2.8 mm. The
white ellipse in the bottom left corner shows the beam size.
ring-shaped dust traps are expected to form when a planet is mas-
sive enough (e.g. Dipierro et al. 2015a; Rosotti et al. 2016). The
edges of these gaps can then become unstable against Rossby
wave instability (RWI, Lovelace et al. 1999; Li et al. 2000, 2001)
giving rise to vortices, i.e., high-pressure regions that can trap
dust azimuthally and form crescent-shaped dust asymmetries
such as those observed at mm-wavelength (e.g. Lyra et al. 2009;
Lin 2012) . The number of planets and their location are, how-
ever, degenerate, and the same system can often be explained
by more than one scenario. Moreover, the lack of directly im-
aged planets and the increasingly strong upper limits on their
mass (e.g. Maire et al. 2017, Mplanet < 4 MJupiter at r ≥ 0.6(cid:48)(cid:48) in
Article number, page 2 of 14
P. Cazzoletti et al.: Evidence for a massive dust-trapping vortex connected to spirals
Fig. 3: Observations of HD 135344B at different wavelengths.
The white circle has a radius of 0.6(cid:48)(cid:48). The white ellipses show
the beam size of each observation.
while the massive inner planet, also carving the dust cavity, may
be launching the second arm. No planet other than the inner one
would therefore be required in this explanation.
Structures similar to those in HD 135344B, i.e. rings and
asymmetries in the mm continuum and spirals arms in scattered
light, have subsequently been observed in V1247 Ori (Kraus et
al. 2017) and MWC 758 (Boehler et al. 2017; Dong et al. 2018),
strengthening the idea of a connection between the asymmetries
observed in the (sub-)mm continuum emission and spiral arms
in scattered light.
The origin of the structures observed in HD 135344B is how-
ever still ambiguous, both because of the limited spatial resolu-
tion of the available data and because azimuthal asymmetries can
in principle be due to mechanisms different than vortices (e.g.
disk eccentricity, as in Ataiee et al. 2013; Ragusa et al. 2017)
which cannot launch spiral density waves.
Spiral arms can also be explained by other mechanisms not
involving an external perturber. Symmetrical spiral arms resem-
bling the scattered light morphology of the HD 135344B disk
can in principle arise from gravitational instability (GI, e.g. Dip-
ierro et al. 2015b; Dong et al. 2015b), although for this specific
system the total disk mass does not seem to be high enough for
GI to arise. Shadows have also been proposed to trigger spiral
arms (Montesinos et al. 2016), and have been observed in the
disk around HD 135344B. Such shadows, however, change on a
much faster time-scale than the spirals.
In this work, we present new high-resolution Cycle 4 and
Cycle 5 ALMA observations of the HD 135344B disk at 1.9 mm
and 2.8 mm, which allows us to test the different scenarios. We
reach a much higher resolution of 0.08(cid:48)(cid:48). The dust emission is
expected to be optically thin at these long wavelengths, and the
bulk of the dust mass inside the observed structures can be de-
termined. These new observations, combined with archival ob-
Fig. 4: Normalized intensities at different wavelengths as a func-
tion of the azimuth, measured along the asymmetry (i.e. at radius
r = 0.6(cid:48)(cid:48)) after deprojecting the data. Note that the intensity peak
shifts monotonically to smaller values of θ as the wavelength in-
creases.
servations at 0.87 mm and 0.43 mm for the same object, allow
us to carry on a detailed multi-wavelength analysis.
In Sec. 2, the observations and the data reduction process are
discussed. In Sec. 3, we present the observed morphology and
the approach used to fit the data. In Sec. 4, we use the data to ob-
tain information on the dust and gas content of the vortex and to
test theoretical predictions on vortices. Finally, in Sec. 5, we use
our new data and results to discuss the origin of the morphology
observed in HD 135344B and its role in planet formation.
2. Observations and data reduction
The new ALMA data of the disk around HD 135344B presented
in this paper are part of three different projects. The Band 4 data
have been observed in C40-8 configuration during ALMA Cycle
4 in two execution blocks on September 14th, 2017 and Septem-
ber 28th, 2017 as part of program 2016.1.00340.S (PI: Cazzo-
letti) for a total of ∼ 45 min with 41 and 42 antennas. Addi-
tional Band 4 observations were carried out during Cycle 5 in
C43-5 configuration, on January 17th, 2018 as part of the DDT
program 2017.A.00025.S (PI: Cazzoletti) in order to recover the
short uv-spacings, for a total of ∼ 22 min on source and using 44
antennas. The Band 3 data were observed in Cycle 5 in the C43-
8 configuration on November 11th, 2017 (2017.1.00884.S, PI:
Pinilla) for ∼ 24 min using 44 antennas, and in the C43-5 con-
figuration on January 17th, 2018 (as part of the DDT proposal
2017.A.00025.S) for ∼ 11 min on source and 46 antennas.
The spectral setups of the Band 4 and 3 observations are as
follows. In order to maximize continuum sensitivity, the Band
4 observations have 4 spectral windows each, with a band-
width of 1875 MHz (channel width ∼ 2 MHz, corresponding to
∼ 3.6 km s−1), with rest frequencies at 161.987722, 159.997750,
149.997890 and 147.997918 GHz. The spectral setup of the
Band 3 observations also have 4 spectral windows in total. Two
of them are centered on the 13CO(1-0) and C18O(1-0) transitions
with rest frequencies at 110.201354 and 109.782176 GHz, and
a bandwidth of 937.5 MHz (resolution of 488 kHz) and 234.38
MHz (resolution of 122 kHz) respectively. The other two win-
Article number, page 3 of 14
01002003000.00.20.40.60.81.0Normalized intensityBand3Band4Band7Band9 A&A proofs: manuscript no. hd13_mw_arxiv
dows are dedicated to the continuum, and are both centered at
108 GHz. In one of them the correlator is set to Time Division
Mode (128 channels, 31.25 MHz resolution and 1875 MHz total
bandwidth), while in the other one it is set to Frequency Divi-
sion Mode (3840 channels, 488 kHz resolution, 937.5 MHz total
bandwidth). In all executions, J1427-4206 was used as bandpass,
pointing and absolute flux calibrator, and J1457-3539 was used
as phase calibrator.
The archival observations are from ALMA Cycle 0 pro-
gram 2011.0.00724.S (P.I. Pérez) and Cycle 1 program
2012.1.00158.S (P.I. van Dishoeck), taken in Band 9 (690 GHz)
and Band 7 (343 GHz), respectively. The details of the calibra-
tion are described in Pérez et al. (2014) and van der Marel et al.
(2016a).
Data were then processed and calibrated through the ALMA
calibration pipeline in the Common Astronomy Software Appli-
cations (CASA 5.1.1, McMullin et al. 2007). The high signal-
to-noise allows self-calibration of the Band 4 data (both ampli-
tude and phase) after standard phase referencing. The visibilities
were then Fourier inverted and deconvolved using the TCLEAN
task in CASA, and imaged using Briggs weighting with a Ro-
bust parameter of 0.5. The synthetized beam size achieved are
0.09(cid:48)(cid:48) × 0.063(cid:48)(cid:48) (Band 4 data) and 0.1(cid:48)(cid:48) × 0.073(cid:48)(cid:48) (Band 3 data).
Note that the analysis carried out in this work was performed
in the uv-plane only, and is therefore not affected by the clean-
ing process. The achieved sensitivity in Band 3 and Band 4 is
25.3 µJy beam−1 and 10.9 µJy beam−1, respectively. The corre-
sponding peak signal-to-noise is 21 in the Band 3 data, and 86 in
Band 4.
3. Results
3.1. ALMA images
The Band 3 (108 GHz, λ = 2.8 mm) and Band 4 (155 GHz,
λ = 1.9 mm) observations of the HD 135344B disk, imaged as
described above, are presented in Fig. 1 and 2. The dusty compo-
nent of the HD 135344B disk consists of a symmetric inner ring
and an outer azimuthally asymmetric, crescent-shaped structure,
potentially due to a vortex. The ring and the crescent are sepa-
rated by a gap. The Band 4 data also show a "bridge" at the west
end of the crescent, connecting it to the inner ring. Interestingly,
the bridge emission is located exactly where the spiral arm seen
in scattered light crosses the gap between the ring and the cres-
cent (see also Fig. 1), although it could also just be due to the
synthesized beam elongation.
Although the images have different spatial resolution, a vi-
sual comparison between the Band 3 and Band 4 observations at
0.08(cid:48)(cid:48) with the archival Band 7 and Band 9 at 0.2(cid:48)(cid:48) shows some
clear differences (Figs. 3 and 5). First, the relative contrast be-
tween the flux of the asymmetry and that of the ring increases
with increasing wavelengths, showing that the two components
have different spectral indices and perhaps even different dust
populations. Second, the images suggest that the emission peak
of the crescent is located at different azimuthal locations in the
different data sets, and moves toward the east at longer wave-
lengths, as also highlighted by the azimuthal cuts in Fig. 4.
The high signal-to-noise Band 4 observations also allow for
a ∼ 5 σ detection of a central unresolved source, either due
to a small inner circumstellar disk surrounding the star or to
free -- free/synchrotron emission from ionized gas in the proxim-
ity of the star (see right panel in Fig. 1), which appears to be at
the center of the dust ring. The presence of a small inner disk
is consistent with the large near infrared excess (Garufi et al.
Article number, page 4 of 14
Fig. 5: Observations of HD 135344B at different wavelengths in
polar coordinates. The data have been deprojected using PA =
62◦ and the inclinations in Table 1. Note the displacement of the
peak of the vortex emission between the different wavelengths;
also note that the ring has eccentricity very close to zero.
2017) due to the presence of hot dust in the innermost regions,
and with the shadows observed in scattered light by Stolker et al.
(2017). No significant central emission is visible in the Band 3
observations because of the lower signal-to-noise, nor at shorter
wavelengths due to the beam dilution (see end of Sec. 4.1).
3.2. Model fit in the uv-plane
To quantitatively constrain the large scale structures in the
HD 135344B disk we fit the surface brightness in the uv-plane
with a simple analytical model similar to that adopted by Pérez et
al. (2014), Pinilla et al. (2015) and van der Marel et al. (2016b).
The inner ring is fitted with an azimuthally symmetric Gaussian
in the radial direction, centered at a radius rR and with σ = σR:
F1(r, θ) = FRe−(r−rR)2/2σ2
R ,
where FR is the peak surface brightness. The outer asymmetric
crescent is modelled as a double Gaussian in both the radial and
azimuthal direction, based on the vortex prescription by Lyra &
Lin (2013), radially centered at rV, with a radial width σV, r, and
(1)
Band 9: 960 GHz / 0.43 mmBand 7: 343 GHz / 0.87 mmBand 4: 155 GHz / 1.9 mmBand 3: 108 GHz / 2.8 mm P. Cazzoletti et al.: Evidence for a massive dust-trapping vortex connected to spirals
azimuthally peaking at θV. As for the azimuthal width, both pre-
liminary tests and visual inspection of our Band 4 data show that
the surface brightness of the system is better represented by an
azimuthally asymmetric Gaussian rather than a symmetric one.
We therefore allow our model to have two different widths σV, θ1
and σV, θ2 east and west of the center of the asymmetry, respec-
tively. Our adopted model is therefore:
V, re−(θ−θV)2/2σ2
V, re−(θ−θV)2/2σ2
FVe−(r−rV)2/2σ2
FVe−(r−rV)2/2σ2
θ ≤ θV
θ > θV
F2(r, θ) =
V, θ1
V, θ2
FV is the peak surface brightness of the asymmetry at loca-
tion (rV, θV). The final model F(r, θ) = F1(r, θ) + F2(r, θ) uses 9
parameters.
The parameters are then found by Fourier-transforming the
analytical model, by sampling it at the same uv-locations as the
observations using the code GALARIO (Tazzari et al. 2018), and
by then fitting them to the observed visibilities with the Markov-
chain-Monte Carlo (MCMC) code emcee (Foreman-Mackey et
al. 2013). The center of the ring (xc, yc) and the inclination i are
also left as 3 additional free parameters, while the position angle
PA, defined east-of-north, is fixed to 62◦, the value found by van
der Marel et al. (2016a) from the CO isotopologues moment 1
maps. The Band 3 and Band 4 data, as well as the archival Band
7 and Band 9 data sets, are fitted independently with the model
described above. In the MCMC, 120 walkers were used and the
parameters were extracted using 24000 likelihoods.
The derived parameters at each wavelength are presented in
Table 1. The model shows good agreement with the data at all
wavelengths, with the inner ring located at 0.38(cid:48)(cid:48) (∼ 50 au) ra-
dius and the crescent at 0.6(cid:48)(cid:48) (∼ 80 au) from the central star.
Fig. 6 shows the synthesised images of the obtained models
and relative residuals, derived with the same imaging parameters
(mask, weighting and number of iterations) as the data. The data
are generally very well fit, and residuals of at most 25% at the
peak are found only in the Band 4 data set. These are due to the
finest resolved structures that cannot be well represented by a
simple double Gaussian as that used to model the crescent.
A comparison between the real and imaginary part of the
visibilites of the data and the models are shown in Appendix A.
4. Analysis
4.1. Dust mass
Under the assumption of optically thin emission it is possible
to convert the observed flux into dust mass. In particular, the
flux density measured in the crescent is 8.6 mJy at 108 GHz, and
20.2 mJy at 155 GHz. The dust mass is then calculated as
Mdust =
Fνd2
κνBν(Tdust) ,
(2)
where the distance d = 136 pc, the dust temperature Tdust at the
location of the asymmetry (i.e. ∼ 80 au) is assumed to be 15
K, as modelled by van der Marel et al. (2016a) using radiative
transfer to fit the spectral energy distribution, and the dust grain
opacity κν is taken as 10 cm2g−1 at 1000 GHz and scaled to the
observed frequencies using an opacity power-law index β = 1
(Beckwith et al. 1990). The calculated dust masses are 44 M⊕
and 52 M⊕ in Band 4 and Band 3, respectively.
These numbers should be regarded as lower limits. First,
mm-wavelength observations are insensitive to the emission
from very large pebbles (cm-size and larger) which, if present,
Fig. 6: Models derived from the MCMC using the parameters in
Tab. 1, and relative residuals for the four data sets available for
HD 135344B. The color scale is the same for the models and the
residuals. The white ellipses show the synthesized beam sizes.
may be hiding part of the mass. Moreover, the dust densi-
ties reached at such high dust masses can make even mm-
wavelength emission partially optically thick. An estimate of the
optical thickness can be obtained from the brightness tempera-
ture Tbright. The calculated peak brightness temperatures are 7
K in Band 3 and 8 K in Band 4. The relation between bright-
ness temperature and physical temperature Tdust is Tbright =
Tdust(1 − exp (−τν)), which when inverted (using again Tdust =
15 K) gives an optical thickness τν of ∼ 0.5 − 0.6 at 108 and
155 GHz. We conclude that the emission can only be considered
marginally optically thin, and that the dust mass of the asym-
metry is likely higher than 50 M⊕. The crescent remains only
marginally optically thin even assuming Tdust higher by a factor
of 1.5, with τν ∼ 0.4.
The inferred dust surface density at the peak of the asymme-
try, derived from the relation τν = Σdustκν for τν = 0.6, and using
the same value of κν as above, is of the order of ∼ 1 g cm−2.
The total flux densities in Band 3 and Band 4 are ∼ 20.0 mJy
and ∼ 42.7 mJy, respectively. The dust masses corresponding to
these flux densities, calculated using Eq. 2 and assuming Tdust =
Article number, page 5 of 14
Table 1: Parameters estimated from the marginalized likelihood distribution. The value is estimated as the median. The upper and
lower uncertainty represent the extent to the 16th and 84th percentile, respectively.
A&A proofs: manuscript no. hd13_mw_arxiv
Ring
Crescent
[Jy/sr]
[(cid:48)(cid:48)]
[(cid:48)(cid:48)]
[Jy/sr]
[(cid:48)(cid:48)]
[(cid:48)(cid:48)]
[(cid:48)(cid:48)]
[(cid:48)(cid:48)]
[(cid:48)(cid:48)]
[◦]
log FR
rR
σR
log FV
rV
σr,V
θV
σθ1,V
σθ2,V
i
xc
yc
Band 3
108 GHz
8.71+0.03−0.03
0.381+0.006
−0.007
0.097+0.009
−0.008
9.36+0.02−0.02
0.603+0.009
−0.009
0.058+0.003
−0.003
162.1+2.5−2.3
34.9+2.2−1.9
40.9+2.8−2.6
17.7+3.4−4.7
15:15:48.417+0.006(cid:48)(cid:48)
−0.006(cid:48)(cid:48)
-37.09.16.433+0.007(cid:48)(cid:48)
−0.008(cid:48)(cid:48)
Band 4
155 GHz
9.229+0.004
−0.004
0.3752+0.0009
−0.0009
0.0858+0.0009
−0.0011
9.758+0.003
−0.003
0.587+0.002
−0.001
0.0545+0.0005
−0.0005
153.6+0.4−0.4
33.8+0.4−0.4
47.8+0.4−0.4
11.9+0.8−0.7
15:15:48.417+0.001(cid:48)(cid:48)
−0.001(cid:48)(cid:48)
-37:09:16.453+0.001(cid:48)(cid:48)
−0.001(cid:48)(cid:48)
15:15:48.419+0.0003(cid:48)(cid:48)
−0.0003(cid:48)(cid:48)
-37.09.16.346+0.0003(cid:48)(cid:48)
−0.0003(cid:48)(cid:48)
Band 7
343 GHz
10.621+0.002
−0.002
0.3686+0.0003
−0.0003
0.0623+0.0004
−0.0004
10.747+0.002
−0.002
0.5783+0.0003
−0.0003
0.0626+0.0004
−0.0004
137.4+0.1−0.1
34.6+0.2−0.2
77.0+0.3−0.2
9.8+0.1−0.1
Band 9
690 GHz
11.464+0.005
−0.004
0.354+0.001
−0.001
0.070+0.001
−0.001
11.306+0.006
−0.007
0.544+0.002
−0.002
0.085+0.001
−0.001
113.9+1.1−1.0
41.7+0.9−0.8
109.6+1.9−1.8
11.6+0.8−0.8
15:15:48.423+0.0007(cid:48)(cid:48)
−0.0007(cid:48)(cid:48)
-37.09.16.333+0.0007(cid:48)(cid:48)
−0.0007(cid:48)(cid:48)
4.2. Spectral index distribution
In a particle trap, dust rapidly reaches larger sizes and grain
growth can be measured through the spectral index of the dust
opacity β. In the Rayleigh-Jeans regime, the spectral index α of
the spectral energy distribution Fν ∝ να at mm-wavelengths can
be related to β, that can be interpreted in terms of grain size when
the dust continuum emission is optically thin (e.g. Draine 2006;
Testi et al. 2014). Values of α with 2 < α < 3 hint at the pres-
ence of large, cm-sized grains and hence dust growth. In the case
of an azimuthal trap, clear spatial variations of the inferred grain
size along the azimuthal direction are expected, with the smallest
values near the center of the vortex. Therefore, spatial variations
of α should be detected. In this section we calculate the spatial
distribution of α in the HD 135344B disk.
The spectral index is calculated between Band 4 and Band
7: the choice of these two wavelengths turned out to be the
best trade-off between large enough wavelength leverage, high
signal-to-noise, and enough spatial resolution to confidently
calculate the value of α. uv-tapering is applied to the Band
in order to obtain the same synthesized beam
4 data set,
as that of Band 7. Finally,
index α is calcu-
lated as α = ln(F155 GHz/F335 GHz)/ ln(155 GHz/335 GHz), after
re-centering the images on the best-fit center obtained in section
3.2. The value of α is calculated using only those pixels with
a signal-to-noise greater than 20 in both bands. The uncertainty
is therefore dominated by the ±5% and ±10% calibration un-
certainties in Band 4 and Band 7 respectively, translating in a
±0.15 uncertainty on the absolute value of α. The obtained map
is shown in Fig. 7.
the spectral
As expected, there is a clear azimuthal variation in the value
of α, with α decreasing to values below 3 inside the crescent.
This is consistent with the presence of large dust grains, and
therefore with dust growth, but can also be due to high opti-
cal thickness, or to a combination of both effects. Interestingly,
the symmetric ring appears to be both optically thin and devoid
of large grains, with β = 1.8 ± 0.3 consistent with interstellar
medium (ISM) grains. The measured variation across the map is
not affected by the absolute calibration uncertainty.
Fig. 7: Map of the spectral index in HD 135344B, calculated
between the Band 4 and the Band 7 data. A clear azimuthal vari-
ation in the value of α can be seen, consistent with the presence
of large grains trapped inside a vortex. The typical uncertainty is
±0.3. White contours show the Band 4 intensity profile at 0.08(cid:48)(cid:48)
resolution to highlight the location of the crescent. The ellipse
shows the beam size of the Band 4 and Band 7 maps.
15 K, are ∼ 90 M⊕ in Band 4 and ∼ 120 M⊕ in Band 3. About
half of the dust is therefore concentrated inside the asymmetry.
The unresolved emission at the star location, seen in Band
4, has a flux density of ∼ 85 µJy, i.e., assuming it is due to a
small inner disk, its dust mass is ∼ 0.1 M⊕. The expected flux
density in Band 7 can be calculated with F343 GHz = F155 GHz ×
(343/155)2 (assuming Rayleigh-Jeans, optically thick emission)
which gives F343 GHz = 416 µJy, which is well below 3σ at the
Band 7 rms level. The inner ring is therefore not observable in
the current shorter wavelength observations.
Article number, page 6 of 14
0.5-0.0-0.5RA [00]-0.50.00.5Dec [00]2.552.973.383.804.21 P. Cazzoletti et al.: Evidence for a massive dust-trapping vortex connected to spirals
Fig. 8: Left: Location of the peak of the emission at different wavelengths as obtained from the fit. The grey contours show the Band
4 data. Right: azimuthal shift of the emission peak at different wavelengths, calculated with respect to the position of the Band 4
emission peak. There is a shift of more than 30◦ between the Band 3 and Band 9 emission. The uncertainty on the peak location in
Band 4, Band 7 and Band 9 is smaller than the size of the dot.
4.3. Peak shift
The fit of the brightness profile allows to quantitatively compare
the morphology of the emission inside the crescent at different
wavelengths. In particular, as shown in Fig. 8, we observe that at
longer wavelengths the fitted peak of the crescent emission is az-
imuthally shifted towards the east, as already qualitatively seen
in Fig. 4. Keplerian rotation can immediately be ruled-out as the
cause of such a shift, as the gas-kinematics combined with the
scattered light (which allows to identify the close and far sides
of the disk) show that the rotation is in the opposite direction.
Assuming that the emission at longer wavelengths is dominated
by larger grains, and in particular that grain size ∼ 3 × λ (Draine
2006), we observe a shift of ∼ 50◦ between the 1.5 mm grains
(traced in Band 9) and 9 mm grains (traced in Band 3).
A different distribution between small and large dust grains
has been predicted by Mittal & Chiang (2015); Baruteau & Zhu
(2016) in vortices, and is an effect due to the vortex gas self-
gravity. However, the direction of the shift is just the opposite
in these models, which always predict a shift ahead of the vor-
tex rather than behind as in the case of the HD 135344B disk.
Baruteau & Zhu (2016), in particular, show that, whereas smaller
grains are trapped close to the center of the gas vortex, larger
grains can get trapped ahead of it. The amount of shift between
the large and small grains depends on the coupling between the
gas and the dust, parametrized with the Stokes number St defined
as
(cid:32)
(cid:33)(cid:32)
St =
π
2
sρpc
Σgas
≈ 0.015 ×
s
1 mm
ρpc
1 g cm−3
(cid:33)(cid:32)10 g cm−2
(cid:33)
Σgas
,
(3)
decoupled from the gas, and that their Stokes number must be
close to unity. Assuming a typical value of ρpc = 1 g cm−3, we
can therefore invert Eq. 3 and obtain an estimate of the gas sur-
face density at the vortex location of Σgas ≈ 1 g cm−2. This gas
surface density is consistent with that obtained by van der Marel
et al. (2016a) by modelling the emission from 13CO and C18O.
The absolute value of the displacement observed in our data is
consistent also with the simulations by Baruteau & Zhu (2016)
and indeed corresponds to grains with St ∼ 1. However, the fact
that their models cannot reproduce the direction of the shift ob-
served in HD 135344B indicates that more simulations exploring
a larger parameter space or studying different dynamical effects
are still needed.
Even though the derivation of the local gas surface density
has large uncertainties in both the Stokes number method and
for the CO isotopologue one, it can be combined with the esti-
mate of Σdust based on the optical thickness of our Band 4 data
to get a qualitative estimate of the gas-to-dust ratio. We find that
the gas-to-dust ratio inside the asymmetry is close to unity, i.e.
significantly lower than 100, the value generally assumed for in-
terstellar clouds. Given the large uncertainties involved in our
calculations, our estimate is in line with the gas-to-dust ratio of
10 commonly found in simulations of dust traps (e.g. Miranda
et al. 2017; Sierra et al. 2017). It should be noted that when the
gas-to-dust ratio approaches 1, dust feedback becomes relevant
and can even cause dynamical instabilities potentially destroying
the vortex (Fu et al. 2014). The simulations by Baruteau & Zhu
(2016) do not include dust feedback.
where s is the radius of the dust grains, ρpc is their internal den-
sity, Σgas is the gas surface density. In practice, particles with
St >> 1 are decoupled from the gas, while those with St << 1
are well coupled. Trapping usually occurs when St (cid:46) 1.
An azimuthal shift as large as that observed, between grains
which are only a factor of a few different in size, means that the
observed mm-sized grains are neither strongly coupled nor very
4.4. Azimuthal dust trapping
Simulations of dust dynamics and evolution in vortices also
predict a different azimuthal concentration for differently sized
grains (Birnstiel et al. 2013). In particular, one of the key pre-
dictions in dust traps is that smaller grains with lower Stokes
number, traced at shorter wavelengths, tend to be less concen-
Article number, page 7 of 14
904503152702251801350.2"0.5"0.8"0.51.01.52.02.5Wavelength [mm]40302010010 []Band9Band7Band4Band3 A&A proofs: manuscript no. hd13_mw_arxiv
5.1. Spirals launched by a planet
The most common explanation for symmetrical spiral arms is
an external, massive planet triggering density waves. Fung &
Dong (2015); Dong & Fung (2017) calculate that a 5 − 10 MJ
at r = 0.7(cid:48)(cid:48) would indeed be able to excite spiral pressure waves
with the shape and the contrast similar to the scattered-light spi-
rals observed in the HD 135344B disk. VLT/SPHERE observa-
tions, however, rule out planets with mass > 4 MJupiter at r ≥ 0.6(cid:48)(cid:48)
(Maire et al. 2017), making this scenario unlikely. These up-
per limits, though, become higher if cold start formation mod-
els are used instead of the hot start ones adopted by Maire et al.
(2017). Moreover, the radial location of the planet is not well
constrained by Fung & Dong (2015); Dong & Fung (2017) and
a planet with similar mass, but located at r ≈ 0.5(cid:48)(cid:48) is still con-
sistent with VLT/SPHERE upper limits even in the hot start sce-
nario. A 5 MJ planet located at r ≈ 0.5(cid:48)(cid:48), i.e., in between the ring
and the crescent, could at the same time launch the spiral arms,
trigger the vortex asymmetry and carve the gap between the ring
and the vortex, explaining all the features at once. In this con-
text, Hammer et al. (in prep.) also show that a slowly accreting
protoplanet can indeed trigger azimuthally asymmetric vortices,
such as that observed here which appears to have two different
azimuthal widths (σθ1,V and σθ2,V in our model).
However, this scenario presents some weaknesses. First, as
shown in the right panel of Fig. 1, the western spiral arm extends
further out than the orbit of the planet in this scenario, i.e. r =
0.5(cid:48)(cid:48). Assuming an external perturber, the launching point of the
spiral would therefore not be consistent with the location of the
planet. Second, since both the planet and the vortex rotate around
the central star at their local Keplerian velocity, their azimuthal
locations are not necessarily the same. The fact that the tip of the
western spiral is so close to the vortex center seems therefore to
favour a connection between the spirals and the vortex (see Sec.
5.2).
In addition, by using the relation between gap width and ra-
dial location described in Rosotti et al. (2016); Facchini et al.
(2018), it is possible to calculate the mass of the planet carving
the observed gap. Assuming a gap with width of ∼ 20 au (i.e.,
(rV − rR)/2, Tab 1), located at ∼ 68 au from the central star (i.e.,
(rV + rR)/2, Tab 1), and a standard viscosity parameter α = 10−3
(Shakura & Sunyaev 1973), the derived mass for the gap-carving
planet is only ∼ 0.2 MJupiter. This inferred mass is much lower
than that required to launch the spiral arms, even though it should
be noted that the relation by Rosotti et al. (2016); Facchini et al.
(2018) was derived for axisymmetric gaps, rather than gaps be-
tween a ring and a vortex as in our case.
5.2. Spirals launched by the vortex
A second possible explanation is that the vortex is massive
enough to excite its own spiral density waves. This scenario is
theoretically motivated(e.g. Paardekooper et al. 2010; Zhu &
Baruteau 2016), and Fig. 1 indeed shows that the tip of the west-
ern, brightest spiral arm is consistent with a launching point
close to the Band 4 vortex center. As opposed to planets that
can be regarded as point-like, however, vortices are extended
sources. No quantitative comparison between models where spi-
rals are launched by vortices or planets has yet been made, and
we will here assume that the mass of the spiral-driving-vortex is
comparable to that calculated in the case of an external planet.
Using Mdust,vortex ≈ 50M⊕, as calculated in Section 4.1, and as-
suming the gas-to-dust ratio of 1 calculated in section 4.3, gives
a total vortex mass of at least 0.3 MJupiter, which is much lower
Fig. 9: Azimuthal width of the crescent as a function of wave-
length. Larger particles are more azimuthally concentrated than
small particles, that are more coupled to the gas. The error bars
in Band 4 and Band 7 are smaller than the size of the dots.
trated than larger grains observed at longer wavelengths. This
behaviour is expected only when dust-trapping is responsible for
the observed crescent-shaped structure, while it is not present
when the asymmetry is due to other mechanisms such as disk
eccentricity. So far, this effect has been observed for the vor-
tex in the Oph IRS 48 disk (van der Marel et al. 2015), for the
HD 142527 disk (Casassus et al. 2015), and the MWC 758 disk
(Marino et al. 2015; Casassus et al. 2018).
We define the total width of the asymmetry as σθ1 ,V + σθ2 ,V.
Using the values obtained for the models at all wavelengths (Tab.
1), the azimuthal width is found to monotonically decrease with
wavelength, as shown in Fig. 9, consistent with the theoretical
expectation for dust-trapping.
5. Discussion
In Section 4 different theoretical predictions for dust traps were
tested, leading to the identification of the crescent-shaped struc-
ture in the HD 135344B disk as a vortex, trapping mm-sized
dust grains. Dust-trapping vortices such as that observed in the
HD 135344B disk can form at the edges of a gap carved by a
giant planet (Koller et al. 2003; de Val-Borro et al. 2007) or at
the edges of dead zones (e.g. Inaba & Barge 2006; Lyra & Mac
Low 2012; Flock et al. 2015). In the case of the HD 135344B
disk, however, the vortex is not located at the edge of a cavity,
but beyond a ring, and may be connected to the spiral arms seen
in scattered light. Looking for a consistent explanation for all of
the observed substructures can give important information about
the number and location of planets potentially embedded in the
disk. In particular, are planets needed to explain the observed
structures, and which role do the ring and the vortex play in the
formation of new planetesimals and planets? On the one hand,
the distribution of gas and dust at radii between 0 and 40 au
shows that the inner dust cavity is probably due to a planet (van
der Marel et al. 2016a), but on the other hand the substructures
beyond 40 au are more complex and require a more detailed dis-
cussion.
Article number, page 8 of 14
0.51.01.52.02.5Wavelength [mm]80100120140Vortex width []Band9Band7Band4Band3 P. Cazzoletti et al.: Evidence for a massive dust-trapping vortex connected to spirals
than that required to launch two symmetrical spiral arms as those
observed.
Given the high uncertainties involved in the calculations of
the gas surface density, it is possible to speculate that the gas-to-
dust ratio is different than that estimated, and even higher by a
factor of 10. Assuming a value of 10 (typical for dust-trapping
vortices, e.g. Miranda et al. 2017; Sierra et al. 2017), the total
mass for the vortex is Mvortex ≈ 1.7 MJupiter. Although still a fac-
tor of 3 lower than the mass calculated by Fung & Dong (2015)
and Dong & Fung (2017), one should note that the dust mass
calculated in section 4.1 is only a lower limit (the dust emission
in the vortex is only marginally optically thin, even at these long
wavelengths), and that the uncertainties involved in the calcu-
lations of the dust mass (especially in the dust opacity κν) can
easily justify the additional missing factor of 3. Moreover, our
results also show that dust is trapped and is possibly growing
inside the vortex: if planetesimal formation is occurring, a large
fraction of the dust mass of the vortex could already be hidden
into larger bodies, not contributing to the observed millimeter
emission.
If the vortex is not triggered by a planet, the dust morphol-
ogy observed in the mm-continuum has to be explained by dif-
ferent scenarios. The ring could be what remains of a first gen-
eration vortex at the edge of the inner cavity, now decayed into a
ring (e.g. Fuente et al. 2017; Pierens & Lin 2018), that triggered
Rossby wave instability developing in a second generation vor-
tex at larger radii (Lobo Gomes et al. 2015), which is seen in the
current observations. Only one planet carving the inner cavity
and triggering the first generation vortex would then be required.
This scenario is similar to was proposed by van der Marel et al.
(2016b), with the difference that in the interpretation proposed
here both spiral arms, and not only the western one, are due to
the vortex.
Finally, Miranda et al. (2017) have shown that the presence
of a ring alongside a vortex is typical when the vortex is gen-
erated at the edge of a dead-zone. They also show that dead-
zone-generated vortices can overcome the effect of dust feed-
back, which would tend to destroy the vortex when the gas-to-
dust ratio is low. However, in their results the ring is located
outside of the vortex (see their Fig. 6 and 7), in contrast with our
observations.
6. Summary and conclusions
We present new observations of the HD 135344B transition disk
at 155 GHz (ALMA Band 4, 1.9 mm) and 108 GHz (ALMA
Band 3, 2.8 mm) and with beam sizes of 0.09(cid:48)(cid:48) × 0.063(cid:48)(cid:48) (12 × 9
au) and 0.1(cid:48)(cid:48)×0.073(cid:48)(cid:48) (14×10 au), respectively. The high signal-
to-noise millimeter continuum maps show a very symmetric in-
ner ring and an asymmetric outer crescent-shaped structure, in-
dicative of a vortex, separated by a narrow gap. This is consistent
with the model proposed by van der Marel et al. (2016b) to ex-
plain 343 GHz (ALMA Band 7) observations of the same object.
The higher signal-to-noise achieved in the Band 4 data also al-
lows us to detect emission from a point source located at the
center of the ring, either due to a small circumstellar disk or to
free-free emission from hot ionized gas close to the central star.
The Band 3 and Band 4 data have been fitted in the uv-plane
with a model consisting of an inner Gaussian ring in the radial
direction, and an outer double Gaussian both in the radial and az-
imuthal direction. The same analysis was repeated for archival
Band 7 and Band 9 data of the same system. This allows us
to quantitatively study the variations in morphology at different
wavelengths, and to interpret them in terms of the hydrodynamic
response of different grain sizes. Our main conclusions are:
1. All the four data sets at different wavelengths are well rep-
resented by the same model, consisting of a symmetric
ring+asymmetric, co-radial crescent.
2. A clear azimuthal variation of the spectal index α (Fig. 7)
is found, with the lowest values approaching α = 2 inside
the crescent. This could be due to the fact that the crescent
is only marginally optically thin, but is consistent with the
presence of large, cm-sized grains (Testi et al. 2014). Future
optically thin observations will be needed to disentangle the
two effects.
3. A monotonic azimuthal shift in the peak of the emission at
different wavelengths is observed for the first time (Fig. 8),
which cannot be due to Keplerian rotation (opposite direc-
tion). Assuming that the emission at longer wavelengths is
dominated by larger grains, this shift could mean that the
crescent is due to a vortex, and that grains of different size
are trapped at different distances from the center of the vor-
tex. A shift of the same magnitude between large and small
grains in vortices was indeed predicted by Baruteau & Zhu
(2016), although in the opposite direction. This indicates that
some additional dynamical effect still needs to be studied or
that relevant regions of parameter space have yet to be ex-
plored.
4. The emission at longer wavelengths, tracing larger grains, is
more azimuthally concentrated than the emission at shorter
wavelengths, tracing smaller grains that are more coupled to
the gas. This is a key prediction of dust trapping models and
simulations (Birnstiel et al. 2013).
5. The results summarized above are strong evidence for identi-
fying the crescent-shaped structure of HD 135344B as a vor-
tex. Massive enough vortices can act like planets and trigger
spiral density waves. We propose that the vortex is the origin
of the spiral density waves observed in scattered light.
6. A planet of 5 MJupiter located outside the crescent can produce
spiral arms with the shape and contrast of those seen in the
HD 135344B disk (Fung & Dong 2015; Dong et al. 2015a).
The mass of the vortex, inferred from the dust emission and
assuming a gas-to-dust ratio of 10 is MVortex = 1.7 MJupiter.
This value could however be even higher, since the dust
emission is only marginally optically thin. A low gas-to-dust
ratio 10 or less is consistent with our estimates and with hy-
drodynamical simulations of gas and dust in vortices (Sierra
et al. 2017; Miranda et al. 2017).
7. Our calculations estimate that about half of the dust mass of
HD 135344B is trapped in the vortex. Hence, the vortex is
a very favourable spot for planetesimal formation. Planetes-
imals may already have formed inside the vortex, and could
be contributing to its dust mass without showing any emis-
sion at mm wavelengths.
Future high resolution observations at shorter wavelengths
and optically thin observations at longer ones, together with hy-
drodynamical modelling to study the proposed scenarios will be
crucial to strengthen our interpretation, to confirm the nature of
the HD 135344B system and to understand the connection be-
tween vortices in the mm and spiral arms in scattered light. Gas
observations at higher spatial and spectral resolution will also be
critical to constrain the gas content and its kinematics inside the
vortex.
Acknowledgements. We thank the referee R. Dong for the very constructive com-
ments which improved significantly the clarity of the paper. We also thank D.
Article number, page 9 of 14
A&A proofs: manuscript no. hd13_mw_arxiv
Lovelace, R. V. E., Li, H., Colgate, S. A., & Nelson, A. F. 1999, ApJ, 513, 805
Luri, X., Brown, A. G. A., Sarro, L. M., et al. 2018, arXiv:1804.09376
Lyo, A.-R., Ohashi, N., Qi, C., Wilner, D. J., & Su, Y.-N. 2011, AJ, 142, 151
Lyra, W., Johansen, A., Klahr, H., & Piskunov, N. 2009, A&A, 493, 1125
Lyra, W., & Mac Low, M.-M. 2012, ApJ, 756, 62
Lyra, W., & Lin, M.-K. 2013, ApJ, 775, 17
Macintosh, B. A., Graham, J. R., Palmer, D. W., et al. 2008, Proc. SPIE, 7015,
701518
Maire, A.-L., Stolker, T., Messina, S., et al. 2017, A&A, 601, A134
Marino, S., Casassus, S., Perez, S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 813, 76
McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W., & Golap, K. 2007, Astro-
nomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, 376, 127
Miranda, R., Li, H., Li, S., & Jin, S. 2017, ApJ, 835, 118
Mittal, T., & Chiang, E. 2015, ApJ, 798, L25
Montesinos, M., Perez, S., Casassus, S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, L8
Muto, T., Grady, C. A., Hashimoto, J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 748, L22
Paardekooper, S.-J., Lesur, G., & Papaloizou, J. C. B. 2010, ApJ, 725, 146
Pérez, L. M., Isella, A., Carpenter, J. M., & Chandler, C. J. 2014, ApJ, 783, L13
Pérez, L. M., Carpenter, J. M., Andrews, S. M., et al. 2016, Science, 353, 1519
Pierens, A., & Lin, M.-K. 2018, MNRAS,
Pinilla, P., Birnstiel, T., Ricci, L., et al. 2012, A&A, 538, A114
Pinilla, P., Benisty, M., & Birnstiel, T. 2012, A&A, 545, A81
Pinilla, P., van der Marel, N., Pérez, L. M., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A16
Pinilla, P., Flock, M., Ovelar, M. d. J., & Birnstiel, T. 2016, A&A, 596, A81
Ragusa, E., Dipierro, G., Lodato, G., Laibe, G., & Price, D. J. 2017, MNRAS,
Rosotti, G. P., Juhasz, A., Booth, R. A., & Clarke, C. J. 2016, MNRAS, 459,
464, 1449
2790
Shakura, N. I., & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337
Sierra, A., Lizano, S., & Barge, P. 2017, ApJ, 850, 115
Stolker, T., Dominik, C., Avenhaus, H., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A113
Stolker, T., Sitko, M., Lazareff, B., et al. 2017, ApJ, 849, 143
Tazzari, M., Beaujean, F., & Testi, L. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 4527
Testi, L., Birnstiel, T., Ricci, L., et al. 2014, Protostars and Planets VI, 339
van der Marel, N., van Dishoeck, E. F., Bruderer, S., et al. 2013, Science, 340,
van der Marel, N., Pinilla, P., Tobin, J., et al. 2015, ApJ, 810, L7
van der Marel, N., van Dishoeck, E. F., Bruderer, S., et al. 2016, A&A, 585, A58
van der Marel, N., Cazzoletti, P., Pinilla, P., & Garufi, A. 2016, ApJ, 832, 178
Weidenschilling, S. J. 1977, MNRAS, 180, 57
Zhu, Z., & Baruteau, C. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 3918
1199
Appendix A: Fit results
Here we report the results of the fits for the four different data
sets. For each data set we show a triangle plot, showing the
MCMC results and the marginalized posteriors for each param-
eter and the deprojected real and imaginary part of the models
(red lines) obtained with the parameters in Tab. 1 compared to
the data (black dots). For Band 3 and Band 4, only the inner
1000 kλ are shown.
Harsono, Z. Zhu, H. Li, S. Andrews and T. Stolker for very helpful discus-
sions, T. Stolker for making available the SPHERE image of HD 135344B,
and the ALMA director for granting DDT time. P.P. acknowledges support by
NASA through Hubble Fellowship grant HST-HF2-51380.001-A awarded by
the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of
Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., for NASA, under contract NAS
5-26555. M.B. acknowledges funding from ANR of France under contract num-
ber ANR-16-CE31-0013 (Planet Forming disks). M.T. has been supported by
the DISCSIM project, grant agreement 341137 funded by the European Re-
search Council under ERC-2013-ADG. Astrochemistry in Leiden is supported
by the European Union A-ERC grant 291141 CHEMPLAN, by the Nether-
lands Research School for Astronomy (NOVA), and by a Royal Netherlands
Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) professor prize. This paper makes use
of the following ALMA data: 2011.0.00724.S, 2012.1.00158.S, 2016.1.00340.S,
2017.1.00884.S and 2017.A.00025.S. ALMA is a partnership of ESO (repre-
senting its member states), NSF (USA) and NINS (Japan), together with NRC
(Canada) and NSC and ASIAA (Taiwan) and KASI (Republic of Korea), in co-
operation with the Republic of Chile. The Joint ALMA Observatory is operated
by ESO, AUI/NRAO and NAOJ.All the figures were generated with the python-
based package matplotlib (Hunter 2007).
References
Andrews, S. M., Wilner, D. J., Espaillat, C., et al. 2011, ApJ, 732, 42
Andrews, S. M., Wilner, D. J., Zhu, Z., et al. 2016, ApJ, 820, L40
Ataiee, S., Pinilla, P., Zsom, A., et al. 2013, A&A, 553, L3
Bae, J., Zhu, Z., & Hartmann, L. 2016, ApJ, 819, 134
Baruteau, C., & Zhu, Z. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 3927
Beckwith, S. V. W., Sargent, A. I., Chini, R. S., & Guesten, R. 1990, AJ, 99, 924
Benisty, M., Juhasz, A., Boccaletti, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 578, L6
Benisty, M., Stolker, T., Pohl, A., et al. 2017, A&A, 597, A42
Beuzit, J.-L., Feldt, M., Dohlen, K., et al. 2008, Proc. SPIE, 7014, 701418
Birnstiel, T., Dullemond, C. P., & Pinilla, P. 2013, A&A, 550, L8
de Val-Borro, M., Artymowicz, P., D'Angelo, G., & Peplinski, A. 2007, A&A,
471, 1043
Boehler, Y., Weaver, E., Isella, A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 840, 60
Brown, J. M., Blake, G. A., Dullemond, C. P., et al. 2007, ApJ, 664, L107
Brown, J. M., Blake, G. A., Qi, C., et al. 2009, ApJ, 704, 496
Casassus, S., van der Plas, G., M, S. P., et al. 2013, Nature, 493, 191
Casassus, S., Wright, C. M., Marino, S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 812, 126
Casassus, S., Marino, S., Lyra, W., et al. 2018, arXiv:1805.03023
Dipierro, G., Pinilla, P., Lodato, G., & Testi, L. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 974
Dipierro, G., Price, D., Laibe, G., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 453, L73
Dong, R., Zhu, Z., Rafikov, R. R., & Stone, J. M. 2015, ApJ, 809, L5
Dong, R., Hall, C., Rice, K., & Chiang, E. 2015, ApJ, 812, L32
Dong, R., & Fung, J. 2017, ApJ, 835, 38
Dong, R., Liu, S.-y., Eisner, J., et al. 2018, ApJ, 860, 124
Draine, B. T. 2006, ApJ, 636, 1114
Facchini, S., Pinilla, P., van Dishoeck, E. F., & de Juan Ovelar, M. 2018, A&A,
612, A104
306
Fedele, D., Tazzari, M., Booth, R., et al. 2018, A&A, 610, A24
Flock, M., Ruge, J. P., Dzyurkevich, N., et al. 2015, A&A, 574, A68
Follette, K. B., Rameau, J., Dong, R., et al. 2017, AJ, 153, 264
Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125,
Fu, W., Li, H., Lubow, S., Li, S., & Liang, E. 2014, ApJ, 795, L39
Fuente, A., Baruteau, C., Neri, R., et al. 2017, ApJ, 846, L3
Fung, J., & Dong, R. 2015, ApJ, 815, L21
Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A1
Gaia Collaboration, Babusiaux, C., van Leeuwen, F.,
et
al. 2018,
arXiv:1804.09378
Garufi, A., Quanz, S. P., Avenhaus, H., et al. 2013, A&A, 560, A105
Garufi, A., Meeus, G., Benisty, M., et al. 2017, A&A, 603, A21
Goldreich, P., & Tremaine, S. 1980, ApJ, 241, 425
Hammer, M., et al. in prep.
Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing In Science & Engineering, 9, 3
Inaba, S., & Barge, P. 2006, ApJ, 649, 415
Isella, A., Guidi, G., Testi, L., et al. 2016, Physical Review Letters, 117, 251101
Johansen, A., Oishi, J. S., Mac Low, M.-M., et al. 2007, Nature, 448, 1022
Klahr, H. H., & Henning, T. 1997, Icarus, 128, 213
Koller, J., Li, H., & Lin, D. N. C. 2003, ApJ, 596, L91
Kraus, S., Kreplin, A., Fukugawa, M., et al. 2017, ApJ, 848, L11
Li, H., Finn, J. M., Lovelace, R. V. E., & Colgate, S. A. 2000, ApJ, 533, 1023
Li, H., Colgate, S. A., Wendroff, B., & Liska, R. 2001, ApJ, 551, 874
Lin, M.-K. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 3211
Lindegren, L., Hernandez, J., Bombrun, A., et al. 2018, arXiv:1804.09366
Lobo Gomes, A., Klahr, H., Uribe, A. L., Pinilla, P., & Surville, C. 2015, ApJ,
810, 94
Article number, page 10 of 14
P. Cazzoletti et al.: Evidence for a massive dust-trapping vortex connected to spirals
Fig. A.1: Fit results for the Band 3 data set.
Article number, page 11 of 14
A&A proofs: manuscript no. hd13_mw_arxiv
Fig. A.2: Fit results for the Band 4 data set.
Article number, page 12 of 14
P. Cazzoletti et al.: Evidence for a massive dust-trapping vortex connected to spirals
Fig. A.3: Fit results for the Band 7 data set.
Article number, page 13 of 14
A&A proofs: manuscript no. hd13_mw_arxiv
Fig. A.4: Fit results for the Band 9 data set.
Article number, page 14 of 14
|
0908.2073 | 1 | 0908 | 2009-08-14T14:25:06 | Solar wind and dynamics of meteoroid | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | The effect of solar wind on dust particle, meteoroid, is investigated. Rotation of the particle is also considered. Detail derivations of both equation of motion and Euler's dynamical equations, are presented. The most simple form of the action of the solar wind is considered and the derived equation of motion reduces to "pseudo-Poynting-Robertson effect" for non-rotating spherical particle. The final equation of motion contains also angular velocity term and it may cause change of orbital plane of the meteoroid. Analysis of the Euler's dynamical equations shows that rotational axis of the meteoroid changes in time and equilibrium state for the orientation of the axis of rotation does not exist for spherical particle. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph |
Solar wind and dynamics of meteoroid
J. Klacka
Department of Astronomy Physics of the Earth, and Meteorology,
Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University,
Mlynsk´a dolina, 842 48 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
e-mail: [email protected]
ABSTRACT
The effect of solar wind on dust particle, meteoroid, is investigated. Rotation of the
particle is also considered. Detail derivations of both equation of motion and Euler's
dynamical equations, are presented. The most simple form of the action of the solar
wind is considered and the derived equation of motion reduces to "pseudo-Poynting-
Robertson effect" for non-rotating spherical particle. The final equation of motion
contains also angular velocity term and it may cause change of orbital plane of the
meteoroid. Analysis of the Euler's dynamical equations shows that rotational axis of
the meteoroid changes in time and equilibrium state for the orientation of the axis
of rotation does not exist for spherical particle.
Key words. solar wind, meteoroid, equation of motion, Euler's dynamical equations,
orbital motion
1. Introduction
At the beginning of the past century, Poynting (1903) has formulated a problem of finding
equation of motion for a perfectly absorbing spherical particle under the action of electro-
magnetic radiation. Robertson (1937) derived a correct equation of motion for a perfectly
absorbing spherical particle. This result has been applied to astronomical problems for
several decades and is known as the Poynting-Robertson (P-R) effect. Relativistically
covariant equation of motion for general properties of spherical particles was presented
by Klacka (2000, 2004). Complete understanding of the action of the incoming electro-
magnetic radiation on the motion of the spherical dust particle was obtained by Klacka
(2008a, 2008b) and Klacka et al. (2009a). Partly similar effect on interplanetary dust
particles is caused not only by solar electromagnetic radiation, but also by stream of
charged particles flowing from the Sun. This stream continuously emanating from the
Sun's surface consists mostly from electrons and protons, α− particles and heavier atoms.
The stream is called also corpuscular solar radiation, or, shortly, solar wind. Dynamical
effects of solar wind on motion of meteoroids are similar to dynamical effects of solar elec-
tromagnetic radiation and they are known also as "pseudo-Poynting-Robertson effect"
(Dohnanyi 1978). Detail understanding of the effect of solar wind on motion of spherical
interplanetary dust particle is presented in Klacka et al. (2009b).
All the mentioned equations of motion for dust particles under action of electromag-
netic radiation and solar wind are correct for non-rotating dust grains. What is the effect
of rotation? How does dust particle rotate? In order to be able to answer the questions,
we will deal with the effect of rotation on the dust particle. We will obtain results not
only for time evolution of rotation of the particle, but also equation of motion of the
rotating particle.
2. Proper reference frame of the dust particle – stationary particle
We will use considerations and accuracy to the first order in v/u and ωR/u (v is helio-
centric velocity of the spherical dust particle of radius R, u is the speed of solar wind
2
J. Klacka: Solar wind and dynamics of meteoroid
with respect to the Sun and ω is angular velocity of the rotation of the particle about a
rotational axis containing center of mass of the particle).
The term "stationary particle" will denote a particle which does not exhibit transla-
tional motion in a given inertial frame of reference. Primed quantities will denote quan-
tities measured in the proper reference frame of the center of mass of the particle. The
particle may be characterized with a rotational motion in the proper reference frame of
the center of mass.
Let S ′ is an incident flux density of solar wind energy (energy flow through unit area
perpendicular to the ray per unit time) and geometrical cross section of the spherical
particle is π R2. We have S ′ = n′ m1 u′2 c, where n′ is concentration (number of particles
per unit volume) of solar wind particles of mass m1 (for simplicity of these considerations
only one type of particles is considered), c is the speed of light, u′ = u′ S ′ is velocity vector
of solar wind particles: unit vector S ′ denotes direction and orientation of the incident
beam of solar wind particles measured in the proper reference frame of the center of
mass of the dust particle. Relations (1) – (19) in Klacka and Saniga (1993) are significant
for the effect of incident solar wind particle. Moreover, Lorentz transformation yields for
elementary force acting on the elementary area of the spherical particle due to action
rot;el/c2, where double
of the incident solar wind (dp′/dt)el;inc = (dp′′/dt)el;inc + E ′′
primed quantities are measured in the frame of reference connected with the rotating
(rotational velocity v′
rot;el) elementary area on the sphere. We have (dp′′/dt)el;inc = n′
el
el = u′ −
[(dA′)el cos α′] u′
ω × ξ′. If we take all these results into account, then we can write for an elementary
force caused by the incident solar wind
el = n′ = n (within the considered accuracy), u′
el m1 u′
el, n′
incv′
(cid:18) d p′
d t (cid:19)el;inc
= n′ m1 u′2 [(dA′)el cos α′] ×
×(cid:26)S ′ − (cid:18) ω × ξ′
u′
· S ′(cid:19) S ′ −
ω × ξ′
u′ (cid:27) +
+ n′ m1 u′ [(dA′)el cos α′] ω × ξ′ ,
(1)
where ξ′ is position vector of the element on the surface of the spherical particle with
respect to the center of mass of the particle, (dA′)el is area of the element. Within the
considered accuracy, Eq. (1) is equivalent to
(cid:18) d p′
d t (cid:19)el;inc
=
S ′ (dA′)el cos α′
c
(cid:18)1 −
ω × ξ′
u′
· S ′(cid:19) S ′ ,
(2)
if the incident flux density of solar wind energy S ′ = n′ m1 u′2 c is used: this enable
to consider more general composition of solar wind, as for various types of solar wind
particles.
Eq. (2) enables to find the total force of the incident solar wind on the dust particle,
and, also the total torque acting on the particle:
(cid:18) d p′
d t (cid:19)total;inc
total;inc =Xel
M ′
=Xel (cid:18) d p′
ξ′ ×(cid:18) d p′
d t (cid:19)el;inc
d t (cid:19)el;inc
,
.
(3)
(4)
In order to find (dp′/dt)total;inc and M ′
total;inc, we may perform calculations in some
special frame of reference:
(dA′)el = [(R sin α′) d λ′] R d α′ ,
J. Klacka: Solar wind and dynamics of meteoroid
3
ξ′ = R (cos α′, cos λ′ sin α′, sin λ′ sin α′) ,
S ′ = − (1, 0, 0) ,
ω = (ωx, ωy, ωz) ,
α′ ∈ h0, π / 2i ,
λ′ ∈ h0, 2 π) .
(5)
Putting Eqs. (2) and (5) into Eqs. (3) and (4), using also Pel −→ R , one finally obtains
(cid:18) d p′
d t (cid:19)total;inc
S ′ π R2
S ′ ,
(6)
=
c
M ′
total;inc = −
1
4
S ′ π R4
c u′
{ω − (ω · S ′) S ′} .
(7)
As for the "outgoing part" of solar wind, we will suppose that the solar wind does
not impart any momentum to the corresponding element of the area on the surface of
the dust particle. Thus, we have (dp′′/dt)el;out = 0 for elementary force acting on the
elementary area of the spherical particle due to action of the "outgoing" solar wind.
Using the relation (dp′/dt)el;out = (dp′′/dt)el;out + E ′′
rot;el/c2, we can write
outv′
(cid:18) d p′
d t (cid:19)el;out
=
x′ S ′
c
[(dA′)el cos α′]
ω × ξ′
u′
,
(8)
where it is supposed that the x′ − th part of the incident energy per unit time is lost
from the dust particle (see Eq. 20 in Klacka and Saniga 1993).
Eq. (8) enables to find the total force acting on the particle due to the "outgoing"
solar wind, and, also the total torque acting on the particle (the sign minus is due to the
conservation of momentum):
(cid:18) d p′
d t (cid:19)total;out
total;out =Xel
M ′
=Xel ( − (cid:18) d p′
ξ′ ×( − (cid:18) d p′
d t (cid:19)el;out) ,
d t (cid:19)el;out) .
(9)
(10)
Detail calculations in a special frame of reference, e. g. given by relations (5), yield
(cid:18) d p′
d t (cid:19)total;out
M ′
total;out = −
=
1
4
x′ S ′ π R2
c
2
3
R
u′
ω × S ′ ,
x′ S ′ π R4
c u′
{3 ω − (ω · S ′) S ′} .
The total force and torque acting on the particle due to solar wind:
(cid:18) d p′
d t (cid:19)total
=(cid:18) d p′
d t (cid:19)total;inc
+ (cid:18) d p′
d t (cid:19)total;out
,
M ′
total = M ′
total;inc + M ′
total;out ,
or, using Eqs. (6)-(7) and (11)-(12):
(cid:18) d p′
d t (cid:19)total
=
S ′ π R2
c
(cid:26)S ′ + x′ 2
3
R
u′
ω × S ′(cid:27) ,
M ′
total = −
1
4
S ′ π R4
c u′
{(1 + 3 x′) ω − (1 + x′) (ω · S ′) S ′} .
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
4
J. Klacka: Solar wind and dynamics of meteoroid
3. Stationary frame of reference – equation of motion
By the term "stationary frame of reference" (laboratory frame) we mean a frame of
reference in which particle moves with a velocity vector v = v(t). The physical quantities
measured in the stationary frame of reference will be denoted by unprimed symbols.
Our aim is to derive equation of motion for the particle in the stationary frame of
reference. We will use the fact that we know this equation in the proper frame of reference:
Eq. (15). In order to find the equation in the stationary frame of reference, we will use
the Lorentz transformation for force acting on the dust grain:
d p′
d t
+
=
d p
d t
Since
E ′
inc − E ′
out
c
E ′
E ′
out = x′ E ′
inc = n′ m1 u′ c2 π R2 ,
inc ,
v
c
.
(17)
(18)
(compare with the right-hand side of Eq. 1: E ′
have
d p
d t
Since S ′ = S (1 − 2v · S/u), S ′ = (1 + v · S/u) S − v/u, Eqs. (15) and (19) yield
inc =Pel n′ m1 u′ c2 [(dA′)el cos α′]), we
+ (1 − x′) n′ m1 u′ π R2 v .
d p′
d t
(19)
=
d p
d t
=
S π R2
c
(cid:26)(cid:18)1 −
v · S
u (cid:19) S −
v
u
+ x′ 2
3
R
u
ω × S(cid:27) +
+ (1 − x′)
S π R2
c
v
u
.
(20)
The last term in Eq. (20) corresponds to the change of grain's mass, in accordance with
Eq. (18):
d m
d t
= (1 − x′)
S π R2
c u
.
Since dp/dt = d(mv)/dt = m dv/dt + v dm/dt, Eqs. (20)-(21) lead to
d v
d t
=
S π R2
m c (cid:26)(cid:18)1 −
v · S
u (cid:19) S −
v
u
+ x′ 2
3
R
u
ω × S(cid:27) .
(21)
(22)
Mass of the homogeneous spherical particle is m = ( 4π/3 ) R3, where is mass
density. Eq. (21) reduces to
= −
d R
d t
where r is distance between the particle and the Sun, and
K
r2 ,
K = (x′ − 1)
r2 S
4 c u
(23)
(24)
is a constant for a given material. According to Dohnanyi (1978) and Kapisinsk´y (1984)
we can take K ≈ 4 × 10−9 cm year−1 (see also Leinert and Grun 1991). The phenomenon
presented in Eq. (23) is known as the "corpuscular sputtering". The units used in Eq.
(23) are: [ R ] = cm, [ t ] = year, [ r ] = AU , [ K ] = cm year−1. Eq. (24) enables to
find the vale of the dimensionless factor x′: x′ = 1.9 × 1011 K[cm year−1] [g cm−3] +
1. As an example, for the case K = 4 × 10−9 cm year−1 and = 1 g cm−3, we obtain
x′ = 7.6 ×102.
J. Klacka: Solar wind and dynamics of meteoroid
5
4. Rotational motion of spherical particle
On the basis of Eq. (16), we can immediately write Euler's dynamical equations:
d (cid:2)(2/5) m R2 ω(cid:3)
d t
= −
1
4
S π R4
c u
{(1 + 3 x′) ω − (1 + x′) (ω · S ′) S ′} ,
(25)
where we have used S instead of S ′ and u istead of u′, within the considered accuracy.
The moment of inertia of a sphere of uniform density is (2/5) m R2.
In order to solve Eq. (25), together with Eqs. (22)-(23), we use, as standardly, Euler's
angles ψ, ϑ and ϕ. We have
d ω1′
d t
d ω2′
d t
d ω3′
d t
= −
= −
= −
5 π
8
5 π
8
5 π
8
S R2
m c u
S R2
m c u
S R2
m c u
{(1 + 3x′) ω1′ − (1 + x′) (ω · S) S1′ } −
{(1 + 3x′) ω2′ − (1 + x′) (ω · S) S2′ } −
{(1 + 3x′) ω3′ − (1 + x′) (ω · S) S3′ } −
5
R
5
R
5
R
d R
d t
d R
d t
d R
d t
ω1′ ,
ω2′ ,
ω3′ , (26)
where we have used the fact that scalar product satisfiesP3
q=1 ωq′Sq′ , and,
S = S1i + S2j + S3k in the stationary frame of reference, S ′ = S1′ i′ + S2′ j ′ + S3′ k′
in the frame of reference rotating with the particle. Moreover, the well-known relations
are:
ω1′ = ψ sin ϕ sin ϑ + ϑ cos ϕ ,
ω2′ = ψ cos ϕ sin ϑ − ϑ sin ϕ ,
ω3′ = ψ cos ϑ + ϕ ,
p=1 ωpSp =P3
(27)
ω1 = ϕ sin ψ sin ϑ + ϑ cos ψ ,
ω2 = − ϕ cos ψ sin ϑ + ϑ sin ψ ,
ω3 = ϕ cos ϑ + ψ ,
S = S1 i + S2 j + S3 k ,
y
r
j +
k ,
z
r
S =
i +
x
r
r = x i + y j + z k ,
(28)
(29)
where r is position vector of the particle with respect to the Sun, source of solar wind,
r = r, v ≡ dr/dt, and,
S1′
S3′ ! = R11 R12 R13
R31 R32 R33 ! S1
R21 R22 R23
S2′
S2
S3 ! ,
R11 = cos ψ cos ϕ − cos ϑ sin ψ sin ϕ ,
R12 = sin ψ cos ϕ + cos ϑ cos ψ sin ϕ ,
R13 = sin ϑ sin ϕ ,
R21 = − cos ψ sin ϕ − cos ϑ sin ψ cos ϕ ,
R22 = − sin ψ sin ϕ + cos ϑ cos ψ cos ϕ ,
R23 = sin ϑ cos ϕ ,
R31 = sin ϑ sin ψ ,
R32 = − sin ϑ cos ψ ,
R33 = cos ϑ .
(30)
(31)
6
J. Klacka: Solar wind and dynamics of meteoroid
Eqs. (28) and (29) yield
ω · S = (cid:16) ϑ cos ψ + ϕ sin ϑ sin ψ(cid:17) x
r
+ (cid:16) ϑ sin ψ − ϕ sin ϑ cos ψ(cid:17) y
r
+
(32)
+ (cid:16) ϕ cos ϑ + ψ(cid:17) z
r
.
We can take into account a non-dimensional parameter, for Solar System
β =
r2 Slight π R2
G M⊙ m c
¯Q′
pr ≡
L⊙ π R2
4 π G M⊙ m c
¯Q′
pr = 2.4 × 10−3 R2(cid:2)m2(cid:3)
m [kg]
¯Q′
pr ,
(33)
where L⊙ is the rate of energy outflow from the Sun, the solar luminosity, M⊙ is
mass of the Sun and G is the gravitational constant and ¯Q′
pr is a dimensionless ef-
ficiency factor for radiation pressure (Klacka 2004). The non-dimensional parameter
("the ratio of radiation pressure force to the gravitational force") reduces to β =
5.7 × 10−5 ¯Q′
pr/([g/cm3] R[cm]), for homogeneous spherical particle: is mass den-
sity and R is radius of the sphere. On the basis of Eq. (33), we can immediately write
for the quantities of solar wind: S π R2 / (m c) = β (η / ¯Q′
pr) (G M⊙ / r2) u/c, where
η ≈ 1/3. Inserting this result into Eq. (26), using also Eq. (24), one immediately obtains
d ω1′
d t
d ω2′
d t
d ω3′
d t
= −
= −
= −
5
8 c
5
8 c
5
8 c
β
β
β
η
¯Q′
pr
η
¯Q′
pr
η
¯Q′
pr
G M⊙
r2
G M⊙
r2
G M⊙
r2
3
(cid:26) x′ + 11
(cid:26) x′ + 11
(cid:26) x′ + 11
3
3
ω1′ − (1 + x′) (ω · S) S1′(cid:27) ,
ω2′ − (1 + x′) (ω · S) S2′(cid:27) ,
ω3′ − (1 + x′) (ω · S) S3′(cid:27) .
(34)
The orbital and rotational motion of spherical dust particle under action of solar wind
and gravity of the Sun is given by Eqs. (23), (27)-(34), together with equation
d v
d t
= −
G M⊙
r2
S + β
η
¯Q′
pr
G M⊙
r2 (cid:26)(cid:18) u
c
−
v · S
c (cid:19) S −
v
c
+ x′ 2
3
R
c
ω × S(cid:27) .
(35)
Equation of orbital motion represented by Eq. (35) depends on angular rotational
velocity of the particle.
5. Conclusion
The action of solar wind on motion of arbitrarily shaped dust particle would produce
planar motion for non-rotating meteoroid orbiting the Sun. If angular velocity of rotation
of the meteoroid is large enough, then rotational term may change orbital plane (see Eq.
35 for spherical particle; see also Eq. 8). Euler's dynamical equations show that orbital
axis of the particle changes and no equilibrium for the orientation of the axis exists.
Equation of motion and quantities for Euler's dynamical equations for arbitrarily
shaped dust grain are given by Eqs. (2)-(4), (8)-(10), (13)-(14), (17) and the first part of
Eq. (18).
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the Scientific Grant Agency VEGA, Slovak Republic, Grant
No. 2/0016/09.
J. Klacka: Solar wind and dynamics of meteoroid
7
References
Dohnanyi J. S., 1978. Particle Dynamics. In: Cosmic Dust, J. A. M. McDonnell (ed.), John Wiley &
Sons, Chichester, pp. 527-605.
Kapisinsk´y I., 1984. Nongravitational effects affecting small meteoroids in interplanetary space. Contr.
Astron. Obs. Skalnat´e Pleso 12, 99-111.
Electromagnetic
2000.
Klacka
J.,
radiation
and
motion
of
real
particle.
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0008.510
Klacka J., 2004. Electromagnetic radiation and motion of a particle. Cel. Mech. and Dynam. Astron.
89, 1-61.
Klacka J., 2008a. Mie, Einstein and the Poynting-Robertson effect. arXiv: astro-ph/0807.2795
Klacka J., 2008b. Electromagnetic radiation, motion of a particle and energy-mass relation. arXiv: astro-
ph/0807.2915
Klacka J., Saniga M., 1993. Interplanetary dust particles and solar wind. Earth, Moon, and Planets 60,
23-29.
Klacka J., Petrzala J., P´astor P., K´omar L., 2009a. Are explanations of the Poynting-Robertson effect
correct? arXiv: astro-ph/0904.0368
Klacka J., Petrzala J., P´astor P., K´omar L., 2009b. Solar wind and motion of dust grains. arXiv: astro-
ph/0904.2673
Leinert Ch., Grun E., 1990. Interplanetary dust. In: Physics of the Inner Heliosphere I, R. Schwenn and
E. Marsch (eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 207-275.
Poynting J. M., 1903. Radiation in the Solar System: its Effect on Temperature and its Pressure on
Small Bodies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A 202, 525-552.
Robertson H. P., 1937. Dynamical effects of radiation in the Solar System. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.
97, 423-438.
|
1309.6861 | 1 | 1309 | 2013-09-26T12:50:00 | A semi-empirical stability criterion for real planetary systems | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | We test a crossing orbit stability criterion for eccentric planetary systems, based on Wisdom's criterion of first order mean motion resonance overlap (Wisdom, 1980).
We show that this criterion fits the stability regions in real exoplanet systems quite well. In addition, we show that elliptical orbits can remain stable even for regions where the apocenter distance of the inner orbit is larger than the pericenter distance of the outer orbit, as long as the initial orbits are aligned.
The analytical expressions provided here can be used to put rapid constraints on the stability zones of multi-planetary systems. As a byproduct of this research, we further show that the amplitude variations of the eccentricity can be used as a fast-computing stability indicator. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph |
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 000 -- 000 (0000)
Printed 6 August 2018
(MN LATEX style file v2.2)
A semi-empirical stability criterion for real planetary systems with
eccentric orbits
C. A. Giuppone1
1 Departamento de F´ısica, I3N, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
2 Observatorio Astron´omico, IATE, Universidad Nacional de C´ordoba, Laprida 854, (X5000BGR) C´ordoba, Argentina ([email protected])
3 ASD, IMCCE-CNRS UMR8028, Observatoire de Paris, UPMC, 77 Av. Denfert-Rochereau, 75014 Paris, France
2, M. H. M. Morais1, A. C. M. Correia1
,
3
,
ABSTRACT
We test a crossing orbit stability criterion for eccentric planetary systems, based on Wisdom's
criterion of first order mean motion resonance overlap (Wisdom 1980). We show that this
criterion fits the stability regions in real exoplanet systems quite well. In addition, we show
that elliptical orbits can remain stable even for regions where the apocenter distance of the
inner orbit is larger than the pericenter distance of the outer orbit, as long as the initial orbits
are aligned. The analytical expressions provided here can be used to put rapid constraints
on the stability zones of multi-planetary systems. As a byproduct of this research, we further
show that the amplitude variations of the eccentricity can be used as a fast-computing stability
indicator.
Key words: celestial mechanics, methods: numerical, methods: analytical, (stars:) planetary
systems, planets and satellites: individual
1 INTRODUCTION
Multi-planetary systems are discovered and confirmed with in-
creasing frequency, with many of the newest planets in configu-
rations called "compact systems" (where all possible stable regions
are occupied and no additional bodies can be found). Usually the
discoveries of new planetary systems are part of large projects, and
it is important to know which systems are already "full" or not,
in order to look for additional companions. In addition, proposals
for observations focus in discovering Earth-like planets in already
confirmed exo-systems. It is thus important to have a fast criterion
to evaluate the stability of Earth-like planets in already confirmed
exo-systems.
The Circular Restricted 3-Body Problem (CR3BP) consists of
a particle moving under the gravitational influence of a primary and
secondary masses. The primary and secondary move in a circular
orbit about their common centre of mass and the particle is too
small to affect the other two. There is a conserved quantity called
Jacobi constant, that can be used to determine regions of allowed
motion. The region of gravitational influence of the secondary mass
is bounded by the Lagrange points, L1 and L2, forming the Hill
sphere. The Jacobi constant can be interpreted as the "energy" of
the test particle and defines the region of allowed motion. A parti-
cle can remain confined in orbit around the primary, or it can cross
the Hill sphere through L1, or even escape through L2. A parti-
cle that cannot cross the Hill-sphere is called Hill-stable (see e.g.
Murray & Dermott 1999).
In the late 19th century Henri Poincar´e studied the stability
of the three-body problem. He hinted at the complicated nature of
c(cid:13) 0000 RAS
the motion that can arise for some starting conditions. Some tra-
jectories, called chaotic, diffuse in phase-space and may escape
or collide with one of the bodies, in contrast with regular trajecto-
ries (Poincar´e 1899). In the CR3BP, orbits that do not obey Hill-
stability but are regular remain bounded, while chaotic orbits that
do not obey Hill-stability may become unbounded.
Wisdom (1980) deduced a criterion for the onset of chaos in
the CR3BP based on the overlap of first order mean motion reso-
nances. The overlap extends in a region around the planet of width
δ = Cµ2/7a,
(1)
where µ is the mass ratio between the planet and its parent star,
a is the semi-major axis of the planet, and C is a constant value.
Wisdom (1980) obtained a theoretical value C = 1.33, but using
numerical simulations Duncan et al. (1989) estimated C = 1.57.
The orbits of test particles in this region exhibit chaotic diffusion
of eccentricity and semi-major axis until escape or collision occurs.
Marchal & Bozis (1982) obtained Hill-stability criteria in the
general 3-body problem. These apply, in particular, to systems with
two-planets orbiting a central star. In this case, the stability limit in
terms of total angular momentum, c, and total energy, h, is:
−
2M
M 3
⋆
c2h
G 2 > 1 + 34/3 µ1µ2
α4/3 ,
(2)
where G is the gravitational constant, mi is the planetary mass, m⋆
is the stellar mass, M = m⋆ +m1 +m2, M⋆ = m⋆m1 +m⋆m2 +
m2m1, µi = mi/m⋆, and α = µ1 + µ2.
Gladman (1993) studied the stability of two close planets nu-
merically and compared results with existent analytic criteria. He
applied Marchal & Bozis (1982) criterion to provide a relation in
2
Giuppone et al.
function of orbital elements. This was obtained by rewriting ex-
pression (2) as:
tances and equal planet to star mass ratio µ , show that these reso-
nances overlap when
a1
a2(cid:19)(cid:18)µ1γ1 + µ2γ2r a2
a1(cid:19)2
(cid:18)µ1 + µ2
where γi = p1 − e2
> α3 + 34/3µ1µ2α5/3,
(3)
i , ei are the planets' eccentricities, and ai
are the planets' semi-major axis. Note that if µ1 or µ2 are zero
(restricted problem) the above relation becomes γ 2
i > 1, that is,
ei < 0 in the non-circular cases, so Hill stability cannot be obtained
directly (Marchal & Bozis 1982). Expressions (2) and (3) are then
better suited to evaluate systems of comparable planetary masses.
Writing a2 = a1(1 + δ), we can solve Eq. (3) to obtain an
estimate of the Hill stability region for the planet m2 as function
of e2, by fixing a1 and e1 for the planet m1. Moreover, when the
planets have circular orbits, the previous expression simplifies as
(Eq. 24, Gladman 1993):
δ > 3.46 h µ1 + µ2
3
i
1
3
a1 ,
(4)
In many works on stability, δ is often defined in terms of mu-
tual Hill radius RH:
RH = h µ1 + µ2
3
Hence we can write Eq. (4) as
i
1/3 a1 + a2
2
.
δ > 3.46 RH ,
(5)
(6)
The stability of coplanar low eccentricity equally-spaced mul-
tiple planet systems has been investigated numerically by several
authors. Chambers et al. (1996) showed that in the mass range
10−6 − 10−2 MJ the mutual distances should be at least 7 −
9 mutual Hill radii to ensure stability on a 10-Gyr timescale.
Smith & Lissauer (2009) performed simulations for 10-Gyr of
multi-planetary systems of 1 M⊕ orbiting a Sun-like star and also
considering a Jupiter-like planet as perturber in some simulations.
According to their results, in closely packed systems stability for
more than 107 − 108 years is assured when the mutual distances
are larger than 10 RH. However, these numbers should not be taken
too exactly because they were obtained assuming regularly-spaced,
equal-mass planetary systems. They are also not applicable to ec-
centric orbits and dynamical configurations such as mean-motion
resonances. For instance, in the GJ 876 planetary system the sep-
aration between the two Jupiter-size planets in the 2/1 mean mo-
tion resonance is only one Hill radius (Correia et al. 2010). More-
over, Lovis et al. (2011) (Fig.13) show that several known multi-
planetary systems are dynamically "packed", with mutual separa-
tions less than 10 RH.
Barnes & Greenberg (2006) performed 1000 numerical inte-
grations of planetary systems similar to HD 12661 and 47 UMA,
which have Jupiter-mass planets and moderately eccentric orbits.
Their work suggests that the true instability boundary is roughly
10% greater than the Hill-stability boundary of Marchal & Bozis
(1982) (Eq.3). This confirms that although Hill-stability does not
guarantee Lagrange-stability, the two boundaries may be close, at
least for planet systems with moderately eccentric orbits. A plane-
tary system near the Hill-stability boundary may become unstable
if the inner planet collides with the star, or if the outer planet es-
capes, although collisions between the two planets cannot occur.
Quillen (2011) computed the strengths of zero-th order (in ec-
centricities) three-body resonances for a co-planar multi-planetary
system. Their analytical estimates, assuming equal mutual dis-
δ ≤ 2 µ1/4a ,
(7)
For mass ratios µ ∼ 10−3 − 10−6 this limit is about 2 times Wis-
dom's 2-body resonance overlap limit defined in Eq. (1).
We just saw that analytic stability criteria were obtained in
very specific cases, namely the CR3BP, 2-planet systems and 3-
planet systems with circular orbits. Moreover, while Hill-type crite-
ria guarantee stability in the three-body problem, there are regular
orbits outside Hill-stable regions that do not escape. An accurate
stability criterion must rely on obtaining the regions where large
scale chaotic diffusion is possible but this has only been done in
the case of circular 2-planet and 3-planet systems. Finally, current
empirical stability criteria for multi-planet systems rely heavily on
numerical integrations, thus may be affected by the choice of initial
conditions. In particular, we observe that these empirical criteria of-
ten underestimate the size of the stability regions.
Our aim is to obtain a stability criteria with the purpose of pro-
viding a quick guide to exo-planet discovery teams. We considered
non-equally-spaced real planetary systems with mass ratio ranging
from 2 to 100, covering Earth-like and Jupiter-like planets. We pro-
vide some guidelines so that observers can quickly test the stability
without having to rely on time-consuming numerical integrations.
2 CROSSING ORBITS CRITERION
A crossing orbit stability criterion relies on the notion that if two
orbits intercept at some point, unless there is some kind of reso-
nant mechanism, close encounters occur and the system becomes
destabilized. Therefore, we expect that the stability limits should
approximately follow the pericentric and apocentric collision lines.
We will explain this concept better below.
Consider a system composed by two planets. One planet, with
mass mi, is a real planet whose orbital parameters ai and ei are
known. The other planet, with mass m, is a "test" planet, whose or-
bital parameters (a, e) are unknown. In stability studies, we usually
want to know which sets of parameters (a, e) are stable or not.
Assume that the two planets mi and m have circular orbits.
Around each body there exists a region of instability with radius
δi. As time evolves, the position of each planet changes, and after
several periods, the instability zone for each planet covers a strip
around the orbit (Fig. 1). When one of the planets is on a eccentric
orbit, the longitude of pericenter circulates and the orbit precesses.
Consequently, for different times we have an instantaneous ellipse
with an unstable region around it. Since the ellipse is precessing,
the instability region is extended. Therefore, if we considerer ec-
centric orbits, the stability limits should approximately follow the
pericentric and apocentric collision lines (Fig. 1).
The pericentric q = a(1 − e) and apocentric Q = a(1 +
e) distances correspond to the extreme orbital positions, so they
give the minimum distances for close encounters with an object
in a inner or outer orbit, respectively. In a real interacting system,
these values change in time but we are only concerned with the
initial observed orbital elements. Moreover, the closest approach
depends not only on the pericentric (q) and apocentric (Q) distances
of both orbits, but also on the orbits' initial alignment, which is
given by the difference in the longitudes of the pericenters, ∆.
Indeed, if the orbits are initially aligned (∆ = 0◦) the minimum
distance between the planes is maximized, while for anti-aligned
orbits (∆ = 180◦) it is the contrary (Fig.2).
c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000
A semi-empirical stability criterion for real planetary systems
3
m2
m1
Mo
δ2
δ1
m2
m1
q2-δ2
Q2+δ2
δ2
Q1+δ1
q1-δ1
Figure 1. Stability regions schema for a system with 2 planets. Top: Both
planets are in circular orbits. The unstable region fills a certain space ai ±δi
(grey zone). Bottom: One planet has an elliptical orbit. The eccentric orbit
precesses with time, so the unstable region is delimited by the pericentric
qi and apocentric Qi distances.
Δ
ϖ=0o
Mo
m1
m2
δ2
δ1
Δ
ϖ=180o
m2
Mo
m1
δ2
δ1
Figure 2. Stability regions schema for a system with 2 planets in eccentric
orbits. Top: the orbits are initially aligned. Bottom: the orbits are initially
anti-aligned. The first situation allows closer semi-major axis than the sec-
ond one. If somehow the system is able to keep its initial configuration,
stability regions are wider in the first case.
c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000
We can construct a crossing orbit stability criterion using the
initial values of the pericentric and apocentric distances that de-
fine the collision lines: Q = Qi and q = qi for aligned systems;
Q = qi and q = Qi for anti-aligned systems. From the pericen-
tric and apocentric collision lines, we obtain an extended crossing
orbit region by adding (or subtracting) Wisdom's overlap criterion
(Eq. 1) from previous section, defined as1:
δi ≡ Cµ2/7
i ai + Cµ2/7a ≈ 1.57hµ2/7
i + µ2/7i ai ,
(8)
where we adopt the numerical estimate C = 1.57 (Duncan et al.
1989). Since Wisdom's criterion is established using circular or-
bits, we have chosen to use the semi-major axis in the previous ex-
pression. Our assumption is that Wisdom's criterion still provides
a reasonable estimate for the size of the chaotic regions when the
orbits are not circular. Our choice is also one of the most conser-
vative among all criteria described in previous section (see Fig. 3).
Indeed, only the 10 mutual Hill radius provides a larger value for
δi (that gives too large instability regions for large mass-ratios).
In Figure 3 we also see that for identical low-mass planets (Earth-
like to Neptune-like planets) some criteria become equivalent: the
Wisdom's overlap criterion for a single planet (Eq. 1) is similar to
the 3.46 mutual Hill Radius deduced by Gladman for two planets
(Eq. 6); and the empirical criterion given by the above equation (8)
for two planets is similar to Quillen's three-body resonance overlap
(Eq. 7).
In the case of an initially aligned system, the extended cross-
ing orbit region depends on whether e is higher or lower than ei
Interior limit
Exterior limit
a > (ai − δi)
a > (ai − δi)
1 − ei
1 − e
1 + ei
1 + e
,
,
a < (ai + δi)
a < (ai + δi)
1 + ei
1 + e
1 − ei
1 − e
,
,
e < ei
e > ei
When the initial orbits are anti-aligned, the extended cross-
ing orbit region is independent on the relation between e and ei,
becoming
Interior limit
Exterior limit
a > (ai − δi)
1 − ei
1 + e
,
a < (ai + δi)
1 + ei
1 − e
In Fig. 4 we plotted the different limits to be applied. In the
1 After submission of this article, a new work by Deck et al. (2013) was
published where the authors develop and test an analytic criterion for the on-
set of chaotic motion due to overlap of first order mean motion resonances in
the non-restricted three-body problem, valid for small eccentricities. They
2/7
conclude that the minimum distance between the planets is 1.46µ
t where
µt = (mi + m)/m⋆. Hence, the minimum distance obtained with Eq. 8
is larger that the estimate of Deck et al. (2013), at most, by a factor 1.76 in
the case of equal masses. In the next section, we will see that in practice our
expression provides a reasonable, more conservative, estimate of the size of
the chaotic region.
4
Giuppone et al.
δ
1 pl=(µ1/3)1/3
δ
1 pl=1.57µ2/7
δ
2 pl=1.57 (µ1
2 pl=1.46 (µ
δ
δ
2 pl=3.46 RHM
δ
2 pl=10 RHM
δ
3 pl=2µ1/4
2/7)
2/7+µ2
1+µ2)2/7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
]
U
A
[
δ
0
1⋅10-6
1⋅10-5
µ
1⋅10-4
1⋅10-3
Figure 3. Comparison of δi for the different instability criteria described
in this paper as a function of the mass-ratio to the star µ. The planets have
equal masses, the central star has 1M⊙, and the inner planet' semi-major
axis is ai = 1 AU. In red we plot the contribution of two individual Hill-
regions. The green line is calculated using the mutual Hill radius as deduced
by Gladman for two-planets on circular orbits. In blue, we show the 10
mutual Hill radius estimated from some numerical works. The pink line
shows δi using Wisdom resonance overlap criterion for a single planet. The
light-blue line shows the semi-empirical criterion proposed in this paper
(Eq. 8) which in this case is a factor 1.76 larger than the resonance overlap
criterion for 2 planets obtained by Deck et al. (2013) (in orange). Finally, in
brown we show Quillen's 3-body criterion.
e
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0
GJ785
δ
δ
δ
δ
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
a [AU]
Figure 4. Scheme of stability regions in the plane (a, e) for a system with
a planet marked at the circle. We used the GJ 785 system as reference.
Solid lines represent the collision lines in the case ∆ = 0◦ (black) and
∆ = 180◦ (blue), while dashed lines delimit the extended crossing orbit
regions obtained with δi (Eq. 8). The dashed green lines represent the "Hill
stability" limit (Eq. 3).
case of a massless test particle, the orbit of the planet does not pre-
cess. As a consequence, the precession of the test particle orbit will
misalign both orbits after some time, so the stability criterion is re-
duced to the most conservative situation (∆ = 180◦). However,
as we will show in the examples of the following section, when we
consider a Earth-like mass planet, the orbits of both planets are cou-
pled, and they may precess together, or present oscillations around
an equilibrium configuration.
Table 1. Initial osculating elements for single-planet systems (Vogt et al.
2002; Pepe et al. 2011; Dumusque et al. 2011).
#
GJ 785 b
HD 7199 b
HD 85512 b
HD 114783 b
a
[AU]
0.32
1.36
0.26
1.2
e
K
[ms−1]
mass
[M⊕]
0.13
0.19
0.11
0.1
3.0
7.76
0.77
27.0
16.9
92.
3.6
317.8
3 TESTING THE STABILITY CRITERION IN REAL
SYSTEMS
We now test the applicability of the crossing orbit criterion for ec-
centric orbits derived in the previous section by applying it to real
systems. We first select some systems with a single planet to illus-
trate how the method works, and then extend the results to systems
with two and three planets.
The integrations were made using a Bulirsch-Stoer based N-
body code (precision better than 10−12) using as initial conditions
astrocentric osculating variables. We used averaged MEGNO2
chaos indicator hY i (Cincotta & Sim´o 2000), to quickly identify
the initial conditions leading to chaotic evolution. MEGNO is a a
wide-spread tool for study the stability of planetary systems, that is
able to distinguish between different levels of chaoticity (for a re-
view see Maffione et al. 2013). The total integration time was cho-
sen to be roughly around 50,000 periods of the exterior orbit, which
is long enough to put in evidence chaotic behavior. For compari-
son, we also computed the stability index (D), a diffusion indicator
based on frequency analysis (see Laskar 1990, 1993), and the dis-
ruption times for the evolution of the system over 200 kyr.
In Figure 5 we compute stability maps for the HD 7199 plan-
etary system with the inclusion of an additional 2 M⊕ mass test
planet. For a fixed initial condition of the observed planet b at
ai = 1.36 AU and ei = 0.19, the phase space of the system is
explored by varying the semi-major axis a and eccentricity e of
the test planet. We observe that the three methods provide more or
less the same results. The limits in semi-major axis for the grids
were chosen to illustrate the validity of the method. The already
detected planets are represented by white circles. The black solid
lines represent the collision lines, and the white solid lines show the
extended crossing orbit limit as defined in Figure 4. If the system is
regular or stable for a given additional planet with mass m, then an
hypothetical lower-mass planet should also be.
3.1 One planet
3.1.1 Stability maps
We selected four systems to show some examples of how the cross-
ing orbit criterion works, namely GJ 785, HD 114783, HD 7199,
and HD 85512. GJ 785 b is a Neptune-mass planet with minimum
mass 16.9 M⊕ with an orbital period of P=74.39 (semi-major
axis of 0.32 AU) and eccentricity 0.11, orbiting a K3V dwarf
(m⋆ = 0.80 M⊙, Pepe et al. 2011). HD 114783 b is a Jupiter-like
planet orbiting a K2V star (m⋆ = 0.92 M⊙) with minimum mass
317.8 M⊕, a period of 496.9 days (semi-major axis of 1.2 AU),
and eccentricity of 0.1 (Vogt et al. 2002). HD 7199 is a K0IV/V
2 MEGNO is the acronym of Mean Exponential Growth factor of Nearby
Orbits.
c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000
A semi-empirical stability criterion for real planetary systems
5
HD7199 - Megno - ∆ϖ = 0o
HD7199 - Megno - ∆ϖ = 180o
0.6
0.5
0.4
e
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.5
1
1.5
a [AU]
2
2.5
HD7199 - diffusion index D - ∆ϖ = 0o
0.6
0.5
0.4
e
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.5
1
1.5
a [AU]
2
2.5
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
-1
-1.5
-2
-2.5
-3
-3.5
-4
-4.5
-5
0.6
0.5
0.4
e
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.5
1
1.5
a [AU]
2
2.5
HD7199 - diffusion index D - ∆ϖ = 180o
0.6
0.5
0.4
e
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.5
1
1.5
a [AU]
2
2.5
HD7199 - Disruption times - ∆ϖ = 0o
HD7199 - Disruption times - ∆ϖ = 180o
0.6
0.5
0.4
e
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.5
1
1.5
a [AU]
2
2.5
105
3x104
104
3x103
103
3x102
102
0.6
0.5
0.4
e
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.5
1
1.5
a [AU]
2
2.5
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
-1
-1.5
-2
-2.5
-3
-3.5
-4
-4.5
-5
105
3x104
104
3x103
103
3x102
102
Figure 5. Stability maps using different chaos indicators for the HD 7199 planetary system with the inclusion of an additional 2 M⊕ mass test planet. Top:
MEGNO chaos indicator; Middle: Mean motion diffusion using frequency analysis; Bottom: Direct numerical simulations over 200 kyr. For a fixed initial
condition of the observed planet b at ai = 1.36 AU and ei = 0.19, the phase space of the system is explored by varying the semi-major axis a and
eccentricity e of the test planet, respectively. The step size is 0.008 AU in semi-major axis and 0.007 in eccentricity. Left: ∆ = 0; Right: ∆ = 180◦. The
black dots give the initial conditions for the orbits shown in Figure 8.
star (m⋆ = 0.89 M⊙) harboring a planet with an orbital period
of 615 days (semi-major axis of 1.36 AU), eccentricity 0.19, and a
minimum mass of 92 M⊕ (Dumusque et al. 2011). HD 85512 is a
K5V star (m⋆ = 0.69 M⊙) and has a planet with velocity ampli-
tude smaller than one meter per second (0.77 ± 0.09 ms−1), with
an orbital period of 58.4 days (semi-major axis of 0.26 AU), eccen-
tricity 0.11, and a minimum mass of 3.6 M⊕ (Pepe et al. 2011).
The stability analysis considers an hypothetical additional
planet with mass equal to 2 M⊕ (or a signal of amplitude of 0.85
ms−1 for a planet in a circular orbit at 0.06 AU for a Sun-like
star). Blue colors indicate regular orbits, while red colors indi-
cate strongly chaotic orbits that usually lead to collision between
planets or escape from the system after close encounters (some of
them can collide with the central star). Many orbits with interme-
c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000
6
Giuppone et al.
HD85512 - Megno - ∆ϖ = 0o
HD85512 - Megno - ∆ϖ = 180o
0.6
0.5
0.4
e
0.3
e
0.2
0.1
0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.6
0.5
0.4
e
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.4
a [AU]
GJ785 - Megno - ∆ϖ = 0o
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
a [AU]
HD114783 - Megno - ∆ϖ = 0o
0.5
1
1.5
2.5
2
a [AU]
3
3.5
4
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0.6
0.5
0.4
e
0.3
e
0.2
0.1
0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.6
0.5
0.4
e
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.4
a [AU]
GJ785 - Megno - ∆ϖ = 180o
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
a [AU]
HD114783 - Megno - ∆ϖ = 180o
0.5
1
1.5
2.5
2
a [AU]
3
3.5
4
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
Figure 6. Stability maps for an additional test planet m = 2M⊕ for different single-planet systems (with different masses), using the MEGNO chaos indicator.
Top: HD 85512 (mi = 3.6 M⊕); Middle: GJ 785 (mi = 16.9 M⊕); Bottom: HD 114783 (mi = 317.8 M⊕). For a fixed initial condition of the observed
planet b, the phase space of the system is explored by varying the semi-major axis a and eccentricity e of the test planet, respectively. The step size is 0.002 AU
in semi-major axis (0.01 AU for HD 114783) and 0.01 in eccentricity. Left: ∆ = 0; Right: ∆ = 180◦. The black dashed line was computed using Eq. (3)
and gives the limits for "Hill-stability" zones. For identical mass planets there is good agreement between these zones and stability limits defined by the
collision lines ±δi. However, for low mass ratios m/mi, large stable areas are discarded.
diate MEGNO values (yellow colors) were integrated by 106 years
(∼ 6 × 106 orbits of the known planet) and appear to be stable. The
black solid lines represent the collision lines, and the white solid
lines show the extended crossing orbit limit as defined in Figure 4.
The "Hill-stability" limits defined by expression (3) are represented
by black dashed lines (when this line is not show it means that it is
beyond the semi-major limits of the figure).
Figure 6 shows the results for the single planet HD 85512,
GJ 785, and HD 114783 systems, using different ∆ as initial con-
ditions. Unstable orbits (red regions) are easily recognized inside
the region delimited by the white lines. Regular motion depends
c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000
A semi-empirical stability criterion for real planetary systems
7
HD7199 - Maximal ∆ϖ - ∆ϖ = 0o
3.1.2 The importance of the initial ∆
0.6
0.5
0.4
e
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.5
1
1.5
a [AU]
2
2.5
HD7199 - Maximal ∆e - ∆ϖ = 0o
0.6
0.5
0.4
e
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.5
1
1.5
a [AU]
2
2.5
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
Figure 7. Maximal libration amplitude for ∆ (Top), and the maximal
amplitude of eccentricity oscillations ∆e (Bottom) for an additional 2 M⊕
test planet in the HD 7199 system. The grid in (a, e) is the same used in
Figure 5 with ∆ = 0. We observe two different dynamical regimes for
∆, in particular there is libration of this angle around 0◦ in a strip roughly
comprised between 0.05 < e < 0.25. We also observe that ∆e reproduces
quite well the results given by the stability indicators (Fig. 5). The black
dots give the initial conditions for the orbits shown in Figure 8.
strongly on the eccentricity and difference of initial ∆. We ad-
ditionally observe some stable regions associated with MMRs, in-
cluding co-orbital configurations, as vertical blue/yellow lines. The
stable regions for initial conditions with ∆ = 0◦ (left frames) are
greater than those with ∆ = 180◦ (right frames).
For the HD 85512 system, which has m/mi ∼ 1, the "Hill-
stability" regions defined by expression (3) almost coincide with
the regions given by δi with ∆ = 180◦ (Fig. 6). However, for
smaller mass ratios m/mi, the "Hill-stability" limit excludes large
regions that can also be considered stable. Indeed, for the GJ 785
system (m/mi ∼ 0.1), this limit still gives a good estimation
for very eccentric orbits, but becomes a bad approximation when
the test planet is near a circular orbit. For the HD 114783 sys-
tem (m/mi ∼ 0.01) the "Hill-stability" region starts at around
ai = 6 AU (for ei = 0), well beyond the limits shown in Figure 6,
meaning that a wide region from 2 to 6 AU is incorrectly discarded.
Therefore, we see that the "Hill-stability" limit is only appropri-
ate for systems with planets of identical mass. This is expected
since Marchal & Bozis (1982) criterion cannot be applicable in the
restricted problem.
c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000
In section 2 we saw that for identical eccentricities, initially aligned
orbits (∆ = 0◦) allow closer semi-major axis (Fig. 4). If the two
orbits precess independently, the angle ∆ can assume any value
and always reach 180◦ after some time. Therefore, it is often as-
sumed that the initial value of ∆ is irrelevant, and that the cross-
ing orbit criterion should rely on the most conservative anti-aligned
configuration (e.g. Barnes & Greenberg 2007; Tuomi et al. 2013).
However, in Figures 5 and 6 we can clearly observe that there is
a significant difference between the two situations. To understand
why a given configuration is stable for some initial conditions with
∆ = 0◦, but becomes unstable when ∆ = 180◦, in Figure 7
we plot the maximal libration amplitude for ∆ and the maxi-
mal amplitude of eccentricity oscillations of the test planet, ∆e, for
HD 7199 when ∆ = 0◦.
We observe that there is a large strip roughly comprised be-
tween 0.05 < e < 0.25 for which the amplitude of ∆ is always
smaller than 50◦, and it goes down to almost zero for initial con-
ditions close to e = ei. For all those trajectories we conclude that
∆ is in libration around 0◦, and therefore overlap between the
two orbits is prevented, so they can remain stable (see some exam-
ples in Fig. 8a,b).
However, for initial eccentricities outside the range 0.05 <
e < 0.25 the angle ∆ is in circulation, so the orbits become anti-
aligned at some point of the evolution. We may then wonder why
these trajectories remain stable, while the exact same initial values
for (a, e) starting with ∆ = 180◦ are not (Fig. 5). The reason for
this is more subtle, but easily understandable if we plot the eccen-
tricity evolution of those orbits together with ∆ (Fig. 8c,d). Since
the eccentricities of the two planets are coupled, due to the conser-
vation of the angular momentum, we can write to the first order in
eccentricity (e.g. Laskar et al. 2012):
e2 = he2i + ∆e cos ∆ ,
(9)
where he2i and ∆e are constant values. For orbits starting anti-
aligned, the initial value of e corresponds to the minimal ec-
centricity, because cos ∆ = −1. However, for orbits initially
aligned, the initial value of e is already the maximal eccentricity
that the planet can attain (cos ∆ = 1). Therefore, when an ini-
tial aligned orbit becomes anti-aligned, its eccentricity is given by
0 − 2∆e, where e0 is the initial value of e. Thus, e is always
e2 = e2
smaller than the initial higher e0, meaning that the orbit is more cir-
cular when becomes anti-aligned and there is no overlap with the
other orbit.
Due to the conservation of the angular momentum, when e de-
creases, ei increases. Therefore, this protecting mechanism is par-
ticularly effective when the mass of the test planet is much smaller
than the mass of the existing planet, since the eccentricity of the
more massive body almost does not change (Fig. 6). We then con-
clude that when searching for stability regions around planets in
elliptical orbits, the crossing orbit criterion with ∆ = 0◦ pro-
vides a more general picture for the stability of the system, less
conservative than the traditional option with ∆ = 180◦.
Comparing Figures 5 and 7 we also observe that the maxi-
mal amplitude of the eccentricity variations in the stable areas is
about 0.2, while unstable areas correspond to larger amplitudes.
Thus, it can also be used as a stability indicator, as proposed by
Giuppone et al. (2012). Although this indicator is less sensitive to
some subtle dynamical regimes, it can provide a global picture
much faster than the traditional stability indicators shown in Fig-
ure 5.
8
Giuppone et al.
2
1
0
-1
)
U
A
(
y
4
2
0
-2
)
U
A
(
y
2
1
0
-1
)
U
A
(
y
4
2
0
-2
)
U
A
(
y
-2
-2
-1
0
x (AU)
1
2
-4
-4
-2
0
x (AU)
2
4
-2
-2
-1
0
x (AU)
1
2
-4
-4
-2
0
x (AU)
2
4
0.4
0.2
0
-0.2
ω
∆
n
s
i
e
0.4
0.2
0
-0.2
ω
∆
n
s
i
e
0.4
0.2
0
-0.2
ω
∆
n
s
i
e
0.4
0.2
0
-0.2
ω
∆
n
s
i
e
-0.4
-0.4
-0.2
0
e cos∆ω
0.2
0.4
-0.4
-0.4
-0.2
0
e cos∆ω
0.2
0.4
-0.4
-0.4
-0.2
0
e cos∆ω
0.2
0.4
-0.4
-0.4
-0.2
0
e cos∆ω
0.2
0.4
Figure 8. Long-term evolution of the HD 7199 planetary system over 1 Gyr, with the inclusion of an additional 2 M⊕ test planet, located at initial orbits
selected from Figure 7: (a) a = 1.0 AU, e = 0.20; (b) a = 2.0 AU, e = 0.25; (c) a = 0.8 AU, e = 0.40; (d) a = 2.5 AU, e = 0.30. Each dot corresponds
to the position of the planets every 10 kyr. In the top panels we show a face-on view of the system. x and y are spatial coordinates centered on the star in a
frame co-precessing with the observed planet (in red). Solid lines show the orbits with maximal and minimal eccentricity for the test planet (in green). In the
bottom panels we show both orbits on the e exp(i∆) plane. In plots (a) and (b) ∆ is in libration around zero, which prevents close encounters, while in
plots (c) and (d) ∆ circulates, but close encounters also do not occur because for ∆ = 180◦ the eccentricity of the test planet is always minimal.
3.2 Multi-planet systems
In order to test the validity of the stability criterion presented in
section 2 for systems hosting more than one planet, we also tested it
in several existing multi-planet systems. Here we present the results
for HD 47186, HD 51608 (two planets, Table 2), and HD 134606
(three planets, Table 3).
The G5V star HD 47186 (m⋆ = 0.99 M⊙) harbors two
Neptune-like planetary companions in hierarchical orbits as re-
ported by Bouchy et al. (2009), with orbital periods of 4 and
1353 days. On the other hand, HD 51608 is a K0IV star (m⋆ =
0.80 M⊙) harboring two super-earth planetary companions, but in
a more compact configuration, with orbital periods of 14 and 95
days (Mayor et al. 2011). We performed numerical simulations us-
ing the initial osculating elements given in Table 2. In Figure 9 we
show the MEGNO stability map for an additional 2 M⊕ test planet.
As for previous stability maps for single-planet systems
(Figs. 5 and 6), around each planet the stability regions appear to be
relatively well delimited by the collision pericentric and apocentric
lines ±δi (section 2). For the HD 47186 planetary system this re-
sult was expected, since the gravitational interactions between the
two observed planets are weak due to the large mutual distances
between the planets. Indeed, when the innermost planet is not con-
sidered, no significative difference is found in the stability map of
the more massive planet.
For the HD 51608 planetary system the two orbits are rela-
tively close, so we can expect to observe three-body resonances
with the test planet. However, this additional source of instability
does not appear to be very strong: stable and regular motion is still
possible between the already discovered planets, where the global
stability regions continue to be reasonably well described by the
extended crossing orbit criterion (described in section 2). In order
to test the reliability of the MEGNO stability indicator in a such ex-
treme situations, we selected two sets of initial conditions (one in-
Table 2. Initial osculating elements for HD 47186 (Bouchy et al. 2009) and
HD 51608 (Mayor et al. 2011) planetary systems.
#
a
[AU]
e
K
[ms−1]
mass
[M⊕]
HD 47186 b
HD 47186 c
0.05
2.395
0.038
0.249
HD 51608 b
HD 51608 c
0.1059
0.379
0.15
0.41
9.12
6.65
4.10
3.25
22.78
111.42
13.14
17.97
Table 3. Initial osculating elements for the HD 134606 planetary system
(Mayor et al. 2011).
#
HD 134606 b
HD 134606 c
HD 134606 d
a
[AU]
0.102
0.296
1.157
e
K
[ms−1]
mass
[M⊕]
0.15
0.29
0.46
2.68
2.17
3.66
9.27
12.14
38.52
side and another outside the orbit of the outermost planet) and per-
formed a direct numerical integration of the system over 100 Myr
(Fig. 11). We observe that the system remains stable. In Figure 9,
together with the MEGNO stability indicator, we also plot the am-
plitude of the eccentricity variations of the test planet, ∆e. As for
the single-planet system HD 7199, we observe that ∆e is also still
able to reproduce the global stability in the case of a multi-planet
system, although it is less accurate in predicting the secular chaos.
HD 134606 is a G6IV star (m⋆ = 0.98 M⊙) harboring three
Super-Earth planets with orbital periods 12, 60, and 460 days, and
moderate eccentricities (Mayor et al. 2011). In Figure 10 we show
the stability maps using MEGNO and the amplitude of the eccen-
c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000
A semi-empirical stability criterion for real planetary systems
9
HD47186 - Megno - ∆ϖ = 0o
HD51608 - Megno - ∆ϖ = 0o
0.6
0.5
0.4
e
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.6
0.5
0.4
e
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.1
1
a [AU]
HD47186 - Maximal ∆e - ∆ϖ = 0o
0.1
1
a [AU]
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.6
0.5
0.4
e
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.6
0.5
0.4
e
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
a [AU]
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
HD51608 - Maximal ∆e - ∆ϖ = 0o
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
a [AU]
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Figure 9. Stability maps for an additional third test planet m = 2 M⊕ for different two-planet systems (with different semi-major axis ratios), using the
MEGNO chaos indicator over 200 kyr (Top), and the eccentricity amplitude of test planet (Bottom). Left: HD 47186 (a2/a1 = 47.9); Right: HD 51608
(a2/a1 = 3.6). For a fixed initial condition of the two observed planets b and c (Table 2), the phase space of the system is explored by varying the semi-major
axis a and eccentricity e of the test planet, respectively. The step size is 0.05 in a log-scale of semi-major axis (left) or 0.002 AU (right), and 0.01 in eccentricity.
The black dots give the initial conditions for the orbits shown in Figure 11.
tricity variations ∆e in the plane (a, e) for an additional fourth-
planet with 2 M⊕, with osculating initial elements from Table 3.
Neither the arguments of the pericenter nor the mean anomalies
were published in Mayor et al. (2011). However, since the system
does not present any mean motion resonance, the mean anomaly
is not a critical parameter. The argument of the pericenter is only
important if the system is locked in some kind of equilibrium as
the one described in section 3.1.2. We assumed for simplicity that
all initial ωi = 0, which corresponds to the most favorable con-
figuration for the stability of an additional fourth planet. Since the
HD 134606 system contains three planets, we also computed δ for
the superposition of three body resonances (Eq. 7). However, due
to the low mass of the planets, this value almost coincide with δi
given by expression (8), and the differences are not perceptible (see
Fig. 3). In Figure 10 we see that even for a three-planet system of
identical masses, the crossing orbit criterion (section 2) still delim-
its reasonably well the stable regions. Nevertheless, in this case
we can observe several mean motion resonances that destabilize
a significant zone inside the "predicted" stable regions. Therefore,
we must be conservative when applying the crossing orbit criteria
to closely packed multi-planet systems, stable regions for high ec-
centricity can only be confirmed by using a stability map analysis
or by performing long-term numerical simulations (Fig. 11).
c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000
4 CONCLUSIONS
We proposed a semi-empirical crossing orbit stability criterion for
eccentric planetary systems which is based on Wisdom's criterion
of first order mean motion resonance overlap (section 2). In order
to test the validity of this criterion we integrated the equations of
motion for several single planet systems considering an additional
low mass planet. We obtained the regions of stability in the plane
(a, e) and we observed that this criterion works very well for these
systems.
Deck et al. (2013) recently obtained an analytic criterion for
the overlap of first order mean motion resonances valid in 2 planet
systems which has the same functional form as Wisdom's crite-
rion but the mass ratio includes both planets' masses. As discussed
in Sect. 2 our semi-empirical extension of Wisdom's criterion is
larger, at most, by a factor 1.76 than Deck et al. (2013) analytic cri-
terion. This means that, in practice, we obtain a wider, more conser-
vative estimate for the extent of the chaotic region. Mustill & Wyatt
(2012) addressed the problem of stability in the circular restricted
three-body when the test particles have eccentric orbits, and de-
duced a new scaling law for the overlap of first order mean motion
resonances which differs from Wisdom's result. However, this cri-
terion was only tested for eccentricities e ≤ 0.1 and, as shown
10
Giuppone et al.
HD134606 - Megno - ∆ϖ = 0o
0.6
0.5
0.4
e
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.6
0.5
0.4
e
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.1
1
a [AU]
HD134606 - Maximal ∆e - ∆ϖ = 0o
0.1
1
a [AU]
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
Figure 10. Stability maps for an additional fourth test planet m = 2 M⊕
for the HD 134606 three-planetsystem, using the MEGNO chaos indicator
over 50 kyr (Top), and the eccentricity amplitude of the test planet (Bottom).
For a fixed initial condition of the three observed planets b, c and d (Table 3),
the phase space of the system is explored by varying the semi-major axis a
and eccentricity e of the test planet, respectively. The step size is 0.05 in a
log-scale of semi-major axis (AU) and 0.008 in eccentricity. The black dots
give the initial conditions for the orbits shown in Figure 11.
recently by Deck et al. (2013) it does not explain all the observed
chaos even in the low eccentricity regime. Here, we tested a semi-
empirical criterion in real planetary systems with high eccentrici-
ties which can go up to e = 0.6 hence a direct comparison with the
work of Mustill & Wyatt (2012) is not possible at this time.
We tested the crossing orbit criterion on multi-planetary sys-
tems with masses mi = 10−6 M⊙ to mi ∼ 10−3 M⊙. In this mass
range, the chaotic region due to the overlap of 3-body resonances
(Quillen 2011) is close to the chaotic region estimated from the
crossing orbit criterion (Eq. 8). Therefore, our results seem to be
still approximately valid for multiple planet systems, as exempli-
fied in the cases of 2-planet systems HD 47186 and HD 51608, and
3-planet system HD 134606. However, when applying the cross-
ing orbit criterion to closely packed multi-planet systems, stable
regions for high eccentricity can only be confirmed by using a sta-
bility map analysis or by performing long-term numerical simula-
tions.
We additionally explored another 30 non-resonant existing ex-
oplanet systems (but not showed in this paper) and our conclusion
remains valid for all of them. Thus, the crossing orbit criterion
0.8
0.4
)
U
A
(
y
0
-0.4
0.8
0.4
)
U
A
(
y
0
-0.4
-0.8
-0.8
-0.4
0
x (AU)
0.4
0.8
-0.8
-0.8
-0.4
0
x (AU)
0.4
0.8
0.8
0.4
)
U
A
(
y
0
-0.4
0.8
0.4
)
U
A
(
y
0
-0.4
-0.8
-0.8
-0.4
0
x (AU)
0.4
0.8
-0.8
-0.8
-0.4
0
x (AU)
0.4
0.8
Figure 11. Long-term evolution of the HD 51608 (left) and HD 134606
(right) planetary systems over 100 Myr, with the inclusion of an additional
2 M⊕ test planet (in green), located at initial orbits selected from Figures 9
and 10, repectively: a = 0.18 AU, e = 0.20 (top), a = 0.50 AU, e =
0.30 (bottom) for HD 51608 (left), and a = 0.182 AU, e = 0.192 (top),
a = 0.436 AU, e = 0.280 (bottom) for HD 134606. We show a face-on
view of the system, each dot corresponding to the position of the planets
every 10 kyr. x and y are spatial coordinates centered on the star in a frame
co-precessing with planet #2 (in red).
seems to provide a quick tool to infer the stability of potential ad-
ditional planets in existing extra-solar systems.
We also showed that in planetary systems with elliptical or-
bits, the crossing orbits criterion with ∆ = 0◦ provides a more
general picture of the stability of the system, less conservative than
the traditional option with ∆ = 180◦. Finally, we saw that the
eccentricity variation (∆e) of the test planet during the integration
can be used as complement to other chaos indicators, that has the
advantage of being computed faster.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge financial support from FCT-Portugal (grant PEst-
C/CTM/LA0025/2011). The computations were performed on the
Blafis cluster at the University of Aveiro.
REFERENCES
Barnes R., Greenberg R., 2006, Astrophys. J. , 647, L163
Barnes R., Greenberg R., 2007, Astrophys. J. , 665, L67
Bouchy F., Mayor M., Lovis C., Udry S., Benz W., Bertaux J.,
Delfosse X., Mordasini C., Pepe F., Queloz D., Segransan D.,
2009, Astron. Astrophys. , 496, 527
Chambers J. E., Wetherill G. W., Boss A. P., 1996, Icarus, 119,
261
Cincotta P. M., Sim´o C., 2000, A&AS, 147, 205
Correia A. C. M., Couetdic J., Laskar J., Bonfils X., Mayor M.,
Bertaux J., Bouchy F., Delfosse X., Forveille T., Lovis C., Pepe
F., Perrier C., Queloz D., Udry S., 2010, Astron. Astrophys. ,
511, A21
c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000
A semi-empirical stability criterion for real planetary systems
11
Deck K. M., Payne M., Holman M. J., 2013, Astrophys. J. , 774,
129
Dumusque X., Lovis C., S´egransan D., Mayor M., Udry S., Benz
W., Bouchy F., Lo Curto G., Mordasini C., Pepe F., Queloz D.,
Santos N. C., Naef D., 2011, Astron. Astrophys. , 535, A55
Duncan M., Quinn T., Tremaine S., 1989, Icarus, 82, 402
Giuppone C. A., Morais M. H. M., Bou´e G., Correia A. C. M.,
2012, Astron. Astrophys. , 541, A151
Gladman B., 1993, Icarus, 106, 247
Laskar J., 1990, Icarus, 88, 266
Laskar J., 1993, Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena, 67, 257
Laskar J., Bou´e G., Correia A. C. M., 2012, Astron. Astrophys. ,
538, A105
Lovis C., S´egransan D., Mayor M., Udry S., Benz W., Bertaux
J.-L., Bouchy F., Correia A. C. M., Laskar J., Lo Curto G., Mor-
dasini C., Pepe F., Queloz D., Santos N. C., 2011, Astron. Astro-
phys. , 528, A112
Maffione N. P., Darriba L. A., Cincotta P. M., Giordano C. M.,
2013, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , 429, 2700
Marchal C., Bozis G., 1982, Celestial Mechanics, 26, 311
Mayor M., Marmier M., Lovis C., Udry S., S´egransan D., Pepe
F., Benz W., Bertaux J. ., Bouchy F., Dumusque X., Lo Curto G.,
Mordasini C., Queloz D., Santos N. C., 2011, ArXiv e-prints
Murray C. D., Dermott S. F., 1999, Solar System Dynamics. Cam-
bridge University Press
Mustill A. J., Wyatt M. C., 2012, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , 419,
3074
Pepe F., Lovis C., S´egransan D., Benz W., Bouchy F., Dumusque
X., Mayor M., Queloz D., Santos N. C., Udry S., 2011, Astron.
Astrophys. , 534, A58
Poincar´e H., 1899, Les M´ethodes Nouvelles de la M´echanique
C´eleste
Quillen A. C., 2011, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , 418, 1043
Smith A. W., Lissauer J. J., 2009, Icarus, 201, 381
Tuomi M., Anglada-Escud´e G., Gerlach E., Jones H. R. A., Rein-
ers A., Rivera E. J., Vogt S. S., Butler R. P., 2013, Astron. Astro-
phys. , 549, A48
Vogt S. S., Butler R. P., Marcy G. W., Fischer D. A., Pourbaix D.,
Apps K., Laughlin G., 2002, Astrophys. J. , 568, 352
Wisdom J., 1980, Astron. J. , 85, 1122
c(cid:13) 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000 -- 000
|
1702.00236 | 1 | 1702 | 2017-02-01T13:07:18 | Resonance capture at arbitrary inclination: II. Effect of the radial drift rate | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | The effect of radial drift rate on mean motion resonance capture is studied for prograde, polar and retrograde orbits. We employ the numerical framework of our earlier exploration of resonance capture at arbitrary inclination. Randomly constructed samples of massless particles are set to migrate radially from outside the orbit of a Jupiter-mass planet at different drift rates totalling more than $1.6\times 10^6$ numerical simulations. Slower drift rates reduce overall capture probability especially for prograde orbits and enhance capture at specific initial inclinations of high order resonances such as the outer 1:5, 1:4, 1:3, 2:5, 3:7 and 5:7. Global capture is reduced with increasing eccentricity at all inclinations as high order resonances capture more particles that are subsequently lost by disruptive close encounters with the planet. The relative efficiency of retrograde resonances at long-lived capture with respect to prograde resonances is explained by the reduced effect of planet encounters as such events occur with a shorter duration and a higher relative velocity for retrograde motion. Capture in the coorbital 1:1 resonance is marginally affected by the radial drift rate except for nearly coplanar retrograde eccentric orbits whose capture likelihood is increased significantly with slower drift rates. An unexpected finding is the presence of a dynamical corridor for capture in high order inner prograde resonances with initial inclinations in the range [50$^\circ$,80$^\circ$] especially at the inner 5:2 resonance whose capture likelihood peaks at 80% to 90% depending on initial eccentricity. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph |
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 000 -- 000 (0000)
Printed 7 November 2018
(MN LATEX style file v2.2)
Resonance capture at arbitrary inclination: II. Effect of the radial
drift rate
F. Namouni1⋆ and M. H. M. Morais 2 ⋆
1Universit´e Cote d'Azur, CNRS, Observatoire de la Cote d'Azur, CS 34229, 06304 Nice, France
2Instituto de Geociencias e Ciencias Exatas, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Av. 24-A, 1515 13506-900 Rio Claro, SP, Brazil
Accepted 2017 January 31. Received 2017 January 30; in original form 2016 August 25.
ABSTRACT
The effect of radial drift rate on mean motion resonance capture is studied for prograde, polar
and retrograde orbits. We employ the numerical framework of our earlier exploration of res-
onance capture at arbitrary inclination. Randomly constructed samples of massless particles
are set to migrate radially from outside the orbit of a Jupiter-mass planet at different drift rates
totalling more than 1.6 × 106 numerical simulations. Slower drift rates reduce overall capture
probability especially for prograde orbits and enhance capture at specific initial inclinations
of high order resonances such as the outer 1:5, 1:4, 1:3, 2:5, 3:7, 5:7. Global capture is re-
duced with increasing eccentricity at all inclinations as high order resonances capture more
particles that are subsequently lost by disruptive close encounters with the planet. The relative
efficiency of retrograde resonances at long-lived capture with respect to prograde resonances
is explained by the reduced effect of planet encounters as such events occur with a shorter
duration and a higher relative velocity for retrograde motion. Capture in the coorbital 1:1 res-
onance is marginally affected by the radial drift rate except for nearly coplanar retrograde
eccentric orbits whose capture likelihood is increased significantly with slower drift rates. An
unexpected finding is the presence of a dynamical corridor for capture in high order inner
prograde resonances with initial inclinations in the range [50◦,80◦] especially at the inner 5:2
resonance whose capture likelihood peaks at 80% to 90% depending on initial eccentricity.
Key words: celestial mechanics -- comets: general -- Kuiper belt: general -- minor planets, aster-
oids: general -- Oort Cloud.
1 INTRODUCTION
The presence of Centaurs and Damocloids (2006 BZ8, 2008
SO218, 2009 QY6 and 1999 LE31) in retrograde resonance with
Jupiter and Saturn (Morais & Namouni 2013) has recently insti-
gated research into the mechanisms of resonance capture at ar-
bitrary inclination. Retrograde resonance refers to mean motion
resonance with the minor body on retrograde motion or equiva-
lently with an inclination larger than 90◦. The most unexpected
recent result was that retrograde resonances are more efficient
at orbital capture than prograde resonances (Namouni & Morais
(2015) hereafter Paper I). For the Centaurs inherently chaotic or-
bits that wander radially between the planets to be captured then
released from mean motion resonances (Bailey & Malhotra 2009;
Volk & Malhotra 2013), the efficiency of retrograde resonance cap-
ture suggests that the dynamical lifetimes of Centaurs and Damo-
cloids on retrograde orbits are probably the largest of their kind in
the solar system.
This conclusion about
the efficiency of retrograde reso-
⋆ E-mail:
(MHMM)
[email protected]
(FN)
;
[email protected]
nances was established in Paper I using large scale simula-
tions (nearly 6 × 105) by setting up massless particles that in-
teract with a Jupiter mass planet while they drift radially un-
der the effect of a Stokes-type friction force with a charac-
teristic timescale of 105 planetary orbits (1.2 × 106 years).
Whereas this timescale is much larger than the involved plan-
etary periods making radial drift an adiabatic orbital process,
smaller drift rates are known to boost capture likelihood for
planar higher order resonances. Using the analytical Poincar´e
model of resonance in the planar three-body problem (Poincar´e
1902; Henrard 1982; Lemaitre 1984; Borderies & Goldreich
1984; Henrard & de Vleeschauwer 1988; Henrard & Moons 1992;
Engels & Henrard 1994; Murray & Dermott 1999), Quillen (2006)
examined how capture probability in first and second order reso-
nances may be reduced through various parameters such as semi-
major axis drift times and initial particle and planet eccentricities. It
was found that probability capture tends to be reduced with shorter
drift times, larger particle eccentricity and a finite orbital eccentric-
ity of the planet.
In order to ascertain the effect of longer radial drift times on
resonant capture at arbitrary inclination, we may not use analytical
tools such as the Poincar´e model of resonance (Morais & Giuppone
2
F. Namouni and M. H. M. Morais
2012) as we explained in detail in Paper I. At resonance passage or
capture, eccentricity and inclination growth may be significant and
three-body dynamics becomes complex: the activation of higher
harmonics near the nominal resonant location may or may not re-
sult in resonance overlap (Wisdom 1980, 1982, 1983) but it does
influence the capture of the drifting particle by temporarily trapping
it in high order resonances before its arrival to the main low order
resonance. In addition, the secular evolution of eccentricity and in-
clination through the Kozai-Lidov mechanism (Kozai 1962; Lidov
1962; Gronchi & Milani 1999; Lithwick & Naoz 2011; Katz et al.
2011) makes resonance crossing more complex through the three
stages of the capture process uncovered in Paper I (see section 3.1).
These facts had motivated one of our main conclusions that reso-
nance order is not necessarily a good indicator of capture efficiency
at arbitrary inclination.
For these reasons, we revisit the numerical set-up of Paper I
and carry out more simulations with longer drift times in order to
measure the capture efficiency of the main thirty resonances asso-
ciated with the Jupiter-mass planet for various eccentricity distribu-
tions. Particle inclination is varied between 0◦ and 180◦ with a 2.5◦
step for the main simulations improving on the 5◦ initial inclination
resolution of Paper I. In section 2, we discuss the numerical setup
and initial conditions. In section 3, we report the measured capture
likelihoods and how they compare to those of Paper I. Section 4
contains our conclusions.
2 NUMERICAL SETUP
In this investigation, we use the three-body problem of Paper I con-
sisting of a solar-mass and solar-radius star, a Jupiter-mass and
Jupiter-radius planet on a circular orbit with semi-major axis ap
and a massless particle with semi-major axis a0 = 3ap outside the
1:5 resonance with the planet (located at semi-major axis 2.924ap).
An imposed slow inward semi-major axis drift will make the parti-
cle's orbit sweep all major resonances. Drift is modelled through a
velocity-dependent drag force of the form −kv leading to a semi-
major axis function a(t) = a0 exp(−2kt). This drag force does
not model a specific physical process that the particles may be sub-
jected to, it is used to study resonance crossing with the simplest
deterministic and unidirectional radial drift that does influence only
the semi-major axis evolution and leaves the other orbital elements
such as eccentricity and inclination unchanged. Three main charac-
teristic drift times are used τ = (2k)−1 = 105, 106 and 107 plane-
tary orbital periods (in terms of physical units: 1.2 × 106, 1.2 × 107
and 1.2 × 108 years) -- unless stated otherwise τ is quoted in plane-
tary periods. In Paper I, only the drift rate τ = (2k)−1 = 105 was
used. The effect of the planet's eccentricity was examined in Paper
I. Here we shall maintain the planet on a circular orbit. The parti-
cle's inclination is taken from the following three sets [2.5◦:177.5◦]
with a 2.5◦-step, [0.01◦:1.002◦] and [178.876◦:179.99◦] with a
0.124◦-step. The last two ranges were chosen to explore nearly-
coplanar configurations avoiding the higher collision probability
inherent to the two dimensional problem. In addition to the three
main characteristic drift times, we simulated four additional values
(τ = 2, 4, 6 and 8 ×105) with an inclination step of 5◦ in order
to determine if capture likelihood evolves smoothly with respect to
drift time which it does.
For each inclination and each eccentricity standard deviation
σe = 0.01, 0.1, 0.3 and 0.7, we generate a statistical ensemble of
1000 particles with random uniform distributions for mean longi-
tudes and nodes, as well as a Rayleigh distribution for eccentricity.
The study thus totals 1 676 000 numerical simulations of resonant
capture. Thirty resonances are monitored: 5:1, 4:1, 3:1, 5:2, 7:3,
2:1, 9:5, 7:4, 5:4, 8:5, 3:2, 7:5, 4:3, 5:4, 6:5, 1:1, 5:6, 4:5, 3:4, 5:7,
2:3, 5:8, 3:5, 4:7, 5:9, 1:2, 3:7, 2:5, 1:3 and 1:4. As in Paper I,
they were chosen as the main first, second, third and fourth order
(prograde) resonances. We note however that resonance order for
retrograde motion is higher at the same nominal location.
One of the important initial parameters in our simulations is
the integration timespan. Only the correct choice of this parameter
will allow us to meaningfully compare the behaviour of the various
resonances with the different drift rates. Setting up a fixed inte-
gration time span for all simulations -- that covers the longest drift
time -- is not adequate. To see this, suppose that the planet suddenly
disappeared from the system, particles with different radial drift
rates starting at 3ap will end up in different locations and would
not therefore have crossed the same physical space nor the same
resonance web unless the integration time span is long enough so
that particles with the slowest drift rate can reach the star's surface.
In that case, all particles if unperturbed would have travelled across
the same space (and removed if they collided with the star) but
those captured quickly in resonance with the fastest drift rates will
artificially increase their eccentricity to unity and end up colliding
with the star. In fact, if the simulation time span is long enough, all
captured particles will be removed regardless of the drift time. A
very long time span will also remove the resonance-free particles
(see next section) and there would be no way to measure their im-
portance with respect to captured and ejected particles. To remedy
these problems, we do not choose an arbitrary integration time span
but impose physical boundaries on the simulations so that regard-
less of drift rate, a given particle if unperturbed would travel from
3ap to an inner location that we choose to be a semimajor axis of
0.246ap. This value reflects our interest in the transport of aster-
oids and centaurs from the outer to the inner the solar system (for
ap = 5 AU, the inner boundary is at 1.23 AU). With the drag force
that we chose this implies an integration time span 2.5 times the
drift time under study preventing particles from being lost because
of an artificial increase in eccentricity if they were captured or be-
cause they precipitated into the star after having resisted resonance
capture by the planet (see next section).
3 ORBITAL OUTCOMES
For a given particle's initial conditions, five orbital outcomes are
possible: capture, ejection, collision with the star, collision with the
planet and stable resonance-free evolution.
3.1 Resonance capture
A particle is considered captured in mean motion resonance if it
survives the full simulation duration. The simulation's time span
that allows a particle unperturbed by the planet to reach a semi-
major axis of 0.246 was chosen so as to give an opportunity to
those particles that were not captured or were released from res-
onance to be trapped at another location. The capture mechanism
in high order resonance for moderate initial eccentricity and incli-
nation was examined in Paper I and shown to present three distinct
stages: capture occurs first in the lowest order inclination resonance
as its Hamiltonian structure far from the nominal resonance loca-
tion is identical to that of a first order resonance (for details see
the Hamiltonian model described in the Appendix of Paper I). The
second stage sees the activation of the Kozai-Lidov resonance for
a duration that depends on the drift time (the longer the drift time
the longer the Kozai-Lidov episode) and ushers capture in high or-
der eccentricity resonance that constitutes the third stage. For larger
eccentricities, the particles may be or enter the Kozai-Lidov reso-
nance before mean motion resonance capture. We do not produce
examples of orbital evolution of captured particles as that was done
in Paper I.
3.2 Ejection
Ejection is seen to occur in our simulations when particles captured
in mean motion resonance do not survive close encounters with the
planet. Such close encounters are favoured by the eccentricity in-
crease during capture. This state is independent of the semi-major
axis drift rate. Fig. 1 shows two such examples. For the fastest drift
rate, τ = 105 (studied in Paper I), we have chosen one of the few
initial conditions that led to ejection for I0 = 7.5◦ and σe = 0.01
(initial eccentricity e0 = 0.00958). The ejection rate at such an ini-
tial inclination is quite low as will be shown in the next section. The
particle is trapped in the 1:2 resonance and its eccentricity increases
to ∼ 0.5 where a brief passage through the Kozai-Lidov resonance
lowers inclination further. Close encounters with the planet occurs
when e ∼ 0.6 and I ∼ 4◦ and destabilise the orbit after a short
time. For the slowest drift rate, τ = 107, the particle's orbit was
taken from the ensemble I0 = 2.5◦ and σe = 0.01 (initial ec-
centricity e0 = 0.00827). The ejection rate at such an initial in-
clination is quite significant as will be shown in the next section.
The particle is captured in the 1:3 resonance and unlike the previ-
ous example with a first order resonance, capture follows the three
stage process where the lowest order inclination is the first to cap-
ture the particle as evidenced by the inclination growth. After its
release from the Kozai-Lidov resonance and capture in the eccen-
tricity resonance, the particle suffers several close encounters with
the planet starting from e ∼ 0.7 and is rapidly ejected from the
system.
3.3 Comparative outcome statistics
The relative importance of the various orbital outcomes in terms
of the ratio of the particle number in a given outcome to the total
number of particles in an ensemble (= 1000) is shown in Figure 2
for the fastest and slowest drift rates (τ = 105 and 107). Only the
fraction of planet colliding particles is not shown as our simulations
indicate that such outcomes are quite rare (< 0.2% for τ = 105 and
< 0.1% for τ = 107.)
For the fastest drift rate, the dominant outcomes are found to
be capture, followed by ejection, resonance-free evolution and col-
lision with the star. For the slowest drift rate, the latter two posi-
tions are exchanged and very few particles remain resonance free.
The significant lack of stable captured particles is directly corre-
lated with the increase of ejected particles regardless of the drift
rate. As mentioned in the previous section, ejected particles were
captured in mean motion resonance, increased their eccentricity
during the capture episode and suffered close encounters with the
planet. Resonances are most susceptible to close planet encounters
when motion is prograde. The stability against planet encounters of
retrograde resonances originates in the physical setting at the en-
counter specifically its duration and relative velocity. Particles on
retrograde orbits encounter the planet with higher relative velocity
during a shorter time than prograde orbits do. For the fastest drift
rate, resonance-free particles are more present for prograde small
Resonance capture at arbitrary inclination
3
eccentricity orbits and retrograde large eccentricity orbits. For the
slowest drift rate, a similar trend is observed but the overall fraction
of resonance-free particles is negligible.
Star collisions peak for polar and nearly polar retrograde or-
bits. This occurs because once captured in resonance such orbits
are unlikely to encounter the planet and increase their eccentric-
ity to near unity where they collide with the star. This brings us
back to the significance of what is measured as a capture fraction.
In our simulations, only particles that survive the full duration of
the simulation and end up in a resonant state are termed captured
in resonance. Particles that were captured in resonance and sub-
sequently ejected by close encounters with the planet, or suffered
a collision with the star are not counted as captured. Such a def-
inition of capture as stable long-lived capture allows us to assess
the robustness of the resonances that we consider with a possible
future application to the dynamical origin and stability of the Cen-
taurs and Damocloids in high inclination orbits in the solar system.
In the next section, we specialise in the long-lived capture orbital
states and analyse the effect of the radial drift rates on the efficiency
of mean motion resonance capture as a function of the resonance
order and initial inclination.
4 RESONANCE CAPTURE STATISTICS
Our choice of initial conditions and in particular that of the semi-
major axis outside the 1:5 resonance with the planet implies that
the measured capture likelihood in a given resonance only indicates
conditional capture probability and is in no way absolute (with the
exception of the 1:5 resonance) as particles are forced to drift ra-
dially and cross the various resonances that may or may not cap-
ture them. We also note that since our ensembles for each inclina-
tion contains 1000 particles, global long-lived capture likelihood is
known at best down to 1 part in 1000. The results of our simulations
are expanded on in the following sections.
4.1 Global long-lived capture statistics
The fraction of particles captured in each ensemble expressed in
percent is shown in the top row of Fig. 3 as a function of the initial
inclination for the three drift rates, τ = 105, 106 and 107. Global
capture fraction is reduced overall as the drift time is increased.
For small eccentricity, σe = 0.01, and beyond 125◦ initial
inclination, capture is nearly independent of drift rate. The cap-
ture peak at zero inclination for nearly circular orbits disappears in
favour of a new one at 5◦ as drift time increases. A deep gap appears
between 15◦ and 45◦ as well as another around 110◦ that deepen
with drift time. Beyond 125◦ initial inclination, capture fraction is
almost unaffected by the drift rate except for a small gap near 175◦
for the slowest drift rate. As eccentricity is increased, the gaps'
edges become less sharp and capture fraction is reduced further
beyond 125◦. Capture of nearly coplanar retrograde orbits for the
drift rate τ = 107 is reduced to a quarter of its value for the base
drift time τ = 105 of Paper I. The statistics of high order res-
onance capture examined below explains why the global capture
fraction decreases as the drift time becomes longer. These reso-
nances are more efficient at capture for slow drift times but they
are also more susceptible to close planet encounters than first order
resonances. Disruptive close planet encounters not only make parti-
cles leave the resonance but they eject them from the system much
like the examples shown in Fig. 1. As particles on retrograde orbits
encounter the planet with higher relative velocity during a shorter
4
F. Namouni and M. H. M. Morais
time than prograde orbits do, high order retrograde resonances are
less affected by close planet encounters. Therefore, regardless of
eccentricity and drift rate, we confirm the finding of Paper I that
retrograde resonance capture are more efficient for retrograde or-
bits than prograde orbits.
4.2 Coorbital resonance
The fraction of particles captured in the coorbital 1:1 resonance
among those captured at all is shown in the bottom row of Fig. 3 as a
function of the initial inclination. Being the strongest mean motion
resonance in the system, it is interesting that we find it marginally
affected by the longer drift rates except for some specific domains.
For nearly circular orbits, the smaller drift rates may double the
capture likelihood of the small peak at 80◦ (compare the curves of
τ = 105 and 106), lower that of the peak at 110◦ and reduce by a
few degrees the initial inclination extent of unit capture probability
for nearly coplanar retrograde orbits. For moderate eccentricities
(σe = 0.10, 0.30), changes are marginal except for 180◦ initial
inclination and σe = 0.30 where capture likelihood jumps from
∼ 40% with τ = 105 to ∼ 70% with τ = 107. For highly ec-
centric orbits (σe = 0.70), capture is enhanced significantly by the
longest drift rate for initial inclinations around 110◦ and 180◦. At
the former, there appears a strong probability peak about 15◦-wide
that follows a zero capture probability range. At 180◦ initial incli-
nation, capture likelihood increases from ∼ 25% with τ = 105 to
∼ 40% with τ = 107. As with global capture, retrograde orbits are
far more efficiently trapped by the coorbital resonance than pro-
grade orbits. A detailed study of the workings of the coorbital reso-
nance may be found in our recent work Morais & Namouni (2016).
4.3 First order outer resonances
The fraction of particles captured in first order outer resonances
among those captured in resonance by the planet is shown in Fig.
4 as a function of the initial inclination. The resonance rows are
ordered vertically according to their encounter with the particles.
Only those reaching or exceeding ∼ 20% capture fraction are
shown. They number three and reach a maximum of ∼ 100% for
1:2 at σe = 0.01, ∼ 30% for 2:3 at σe = 0.10, and ∼ 30% for 5:6
at σe = 0.01, 0.10 and 0.30.
For nearly circular orbits (σe = 0.01), the 1:2 capture likeli-
hood is reduced for nearly coplanar prograde orbits as the drift time
becomes longer and drops from ∼ 100% for τ = 105 to ∼ 20%
for τ = 107. Smaller peaks and gaps punctuate the capture fraction
curve especially one at an initial inclination of 45◦ where likelihood
peaks at ∼ 65%. The efficiency of the 1:2 resonance at capturing
retrograde orbits (initial inclination > 120◦) is seriously reduced
for longer drift times by the outer higher order resonances that trap
particles first and prevent them traveling further towards the planet.
For large eccentricity ensembles (σe = 0.30, 0.70), longer drift
times tend to enhance capture likelihood threefold in the vicinity
120◦ initial inclination.
For moderate to large eccentricity (σe = 0.10, 0.30 and 0.70),
capture in the 2:3 resonance is globally reduced by slower drift
rates. For nearly circular orbits (σe = 0.01) and longer drift times,
particles are not trapped in resonance except those with nearly polar
orbits and to a lesser extent those with inclinations of 60◦, 110◦
and 150◦. This preference for polar orbits with longer drift rates is
displayed by the 5:6 resonances as capture likelihood is increased
threefold to fivefold.
4.4 Second and third order outer resonances
The fraction of particles captured in second and third order outer
resonances among those captured in resonance by the planet is
shown in Fig. 5 as a function of the initial inclination. The reso-
nance rows are ordered vertically according to their encounter with
the particles. Only 1:3, 5:7, 1:4 and 2:5 reach or exceed ∼ 20%
capture fractions. The effect of longer drift times on second order
planar resonances studied by Quillen (2006) may be seen on the ini-
tially nearly coplanar orbits that are captured in 1:3 resonance. For
the initially nearly circular orbits' ensembles (σe = 0.01), only the
longest drift rate τ = 107 increases the capture fraction to nearly
80% for nearly coplanar orbits. A secondary capture peak rises near
25◦. For larger eccentricity ensembles (σe = 0.10, 0.30 and 0.70),
capture is enhanced only for retrograde orbits with an initial in-
clination larger than 120◦. The 5:7 second order resonance has an
efficiency peak at an initial inclination of ∼ 35◦ for nearly circular
orbits but otherwise shows a preference for polar orbits at larger
eccentricities. The third order outer resonances 1:4 and 2:5 show
some of the most important changes as the drift rate is increased.
Three narrow capture peaks for nearly circular orbits (σe = 0.01)
at 60% and 100% for initial inclinations between 15◦ and 35◦ ap-
pear for 1:4 along a much broader one for the initial inclination
range [90◦, 160◦] rising to 100%. As the initial eccentricity stan-
dard deviation is increased, a single efficiency peak remains for
prograde orbits around 40◦ up to σe = 0.30 whereas capture of
polar and retrograde orbits is enhanced significantly for the former
and moderately for the latter. The longer drift time capture fractions
of the 2:5 resonances peak at least at 70% for prograde orbits and
σe 6 0.30. For nearly circular orbits an efficiency peak at nearly
80% appears around an initial inclination of 15◦ but not for initially
coplanar orbits.
With the longest radial drift rate τ = 107 capture of prograde
orbits occurs mainly in high order resonances. Although the results
of this section refer to particles that survived the full integration
timespan, it is worth noting that the large fraction of ejected par-
ticles on prograde orbits with the longest drift time were captured
by high order resonances. The susceptibility of such resonances
to close planet encounters accounts for the capture asymmetry of
prograde and retrograde resonances as the latter are less disrupted
because encounters occur for a shorter duration and at a larger ve-
locity with respect to prograde motion.
4.5 Fourth order outer resonances
The fraction of particles captured in second and third order outer
resonances among those captured in resonance by the planet is
shown in Fig. 6 as a function of the initial inclination. Only 1:5
and 3:7 reach or exceed ∼ 20% capture fractions. The case of the
1:5 resonance is interesting as it is the only resonance for which
an absolute capture fraction may be known since it is the first ma-
jor resonance to be encountered by all particles. Capture for nearly
coplanar circular orbits is a rare event even with the slowest drift
rate. For the shortest drift time τ = 105, this resonance captured
prograde orbits more efficiently if their initial eccentricities were
very small (σe = 0.01) or very large (σe = 0.70) and retrograde
orbits only at large eccentricity (σe = 0.70). For all but the largest
initial eccentricities, this behaviour is modified by the larger drift
rates as polar orbits are singled out for efficient capture, retrograde
capture is enhanced but prograde orbits not captured at all. For the
largest eccentricities (σe = 0.70) capture is enhanced overall with
a peak at 45% for prograde orbits with an initial inclination of 30◦
and a wider one around 90◦ at 80%. This reinforces our earlier
conclusion in Paper I that resonance order at arbitrary inclination
(and eccentricity) is not necessarily a good indicator for capture
efficiency. The fourth order 3:7 outer resonance shows an equally
interesting behaviour: apart from the much enhanced capture of po-
lar orbits as the drift time is increased (fivefold for σe = 0.10 and
τ = 106 and tenfold for τ = 107), singular narrow efficiency
peaks show up for prograde orbits at locations unrelated to that
of the faster drift rate τ = 105 at 45◦. Moreover, capture in ret-
rograde resonances is reduced and rendered impossible at certain
inclinations (e.g. [100◦, 120◦] for σe = 0.70 and τ = 107).
4.6 First order inner resonances
As capture in high order outer resonances is found to be enhanced
by the longer drift times, one expects that the first order (and
strongest) inner resonances will capture less particles. The reality is
a little different (Fig. 7). For all but the high eccentricity ensembles,
capture is mainly suppressed at most inclinations except in a 15◦-
wide range adjacent near 75◦ for the 6:5, 5:4 and 3:2 resonances
and 65◦ for the 2:1 resonance (with τ = 107) where capture is sig-
nificantly enhanced. For the largest eccentricities (σe = 0.70), in
addition to increasing the width of the previous domain from 15◦ to
30◦, several capture peaks are found for smaller initial inclinations.
4.7 High order inner resonances
The effect of longer drift times on resonance capture is perhaps
most surprising for high order inner resonances as particles are set
out far outside the planet's orbit. The resonance capture fractions
are shown in Fig. 8 and 9. For the drift rate of Paper I, τ = 105,
only the inner third order 5:2 resonance showed a large capture
likelihood ∼ 35% for initially nearly circular orbits centred around
the initial inclination of 55◦. With the longer drift rates of τ = 106
and 107, six resonances show a capture fraction in excess of 20%.
They are second order 7:5, 5:3 and 3:1, fourth order 9:5 and 7:3 and
third order 5:2. The longer drift rates generally tend to increase the
amplitude of the capture peak of maximum efficiency and narrow
its width. For all but the largest eccentricities, additional capture
peaks are present for smaller prograde inclinations. The 7:5 res-
onance doubles its capture fraction peaking at 75◦ initial inclina-
tion. The 5:3 capture fraction around the same location is increased
threefold to fivefold depending on the eccentricity standard devia-
tion and drift time. The 3:1 resonance develops very narrow capture
peaks for prograde orbits at low to moderate eccentricities and ad-
ditional peaks for retrograde large eccentricity orbits. Fourth order
resonances are similar to second order resonances except for the
precise location of their peak efficiency and their capture ampli-
tudes that tend to be larger at moderate to high eccentricities. The
third order 5:2 resonance shows the largest amplitudes among inner
resonances exceeding 90% for τ = 106 and σe = 0.01 and 80%
for τ = 107 and σe = 0.30 peaking around 50◦ to 55◦ initial incli-
nation. Although the global fraction of captured particles at these
initial inclinations is small (a few to 10%), most of it will end up
inside the planet's orbit at the 5:2 resonance. More generally, we
may conclude that in the initial inclination range [50◦,80◦], there
seems to be corridors for particles to drift past the planet's orbit
and be captured in high order inner resonances. Examination of
the final states in that initial inclination range reveals that particles
with moderate eccentricities and an initial inclination lower than
55◦ tend to remain on prograde orbits. Otherwise orbits may end
Resonance capture at arbitrary inclination
5
up significantly inclined and tend to cluster around the Kozai-Lidov
resonance with ω = 0◦ and 180◦.
5 CONCLUSION
Our extended numerical simulations of resonance capture show that
the effect of the radial drift rate is mostly seen on the specific cap-
ture ability of individual resonances. In agreement with Paper I,
retrograde orbits are overall much more likely to be captured in
resonance than prograde orbits. The physical explanation is related
to the disruption caused by planetary encounters that favours ret-
rograde orbits as particles encounter the planet for a shorter dura-
tion with a higher relative velocity with respect to prograde orbits.
The retrograde versus prograde resonance capture asymmetry has
recently been confirmed in simulations about the origin of Halley-
type comets and its possible relation to the evolution of long period
comets (Fern´andez et al. 2016).
Longer radial drift times favour capture in high order reso-
nances especially for low eccentricity orbits at low initial inclina-
tions and moderate to high eccentricity for polar and sub-polar ini-
tial inclinations confirming the findings of Quillen (2006) as far as
two dimensional capture is concerned. As high order resonances
are more affected by disruptive planetary encounters because of
their intrinsic dynamical weakness, longer radial drift times reduce
the overall capture tally especially for prograde orbits. In this re-
gard, our results also imply that the drift rates at which higher order
retrograde resonances are more efficient at resonance capture may
still be larger than the longest drift time employed in this study. In
effect, the capture likelihood of nearly circular orbits with initial
inclinations from 150◦ to 180◦ is unaffected by changing the drift
times (we used) and their capture occurs always in the 1:2 reso-
nance instead for instance of the 1:3 or 1:4 as for prograde motion.
We have uncovered stable dynamical corridors that guarantee
safe passage to particles starting from outside the 1:5 resonance of
a given planet all the way to its inner 5:2 resonance where they are
finally captured. As our study is based on the three-body problem,
we are not able to predict the behaviour of such corridors for a
multi-planet system and in particular the solar system with its four
outer planets. More simulations are required to ascertain whether
such corridors exist and how those pertaining to different planets
combine.
Our main motivation for this paper and its predecessor, is the
origin of Centaurs and Damocloids on retrograde orbits. These
objects are known to follow two types of dynamical evolution
(Bailey & Malhotra 2009; Volk & Malhotra 2013): random walk
and resonance sticking. In the first type, orbits have the shorter life-
times of order 107 years as they are dominated by frequent close
encounters with the giant planets whereas in the second type they
are long lived and may survive 108 years. For the latter type, radial
drift is mainly caused by weak chaos originating from the overlap-
ping of resonances of the four giant planets in the solar system.
The insight we gained from exploring resonant capture at arbitrary
inclination for migration timescales comparable to the chaos gener-
ated drift rates will help us elucidate the significance of the bipolar
nature of the Centaurs' dynamical evolution and its possible link to
their original reservoirs in the solar system.
6
F. Namouni and M. H. M. Morais
I0 = 7.5o, e0 = 0.0096, τ = 105
I0 = 2.5o, e0 = 0.0083, τ = 107
3
a/ap
2
1
1
e
0.5
0
180
ω(°)
0
-180
0
10
I(°)
5
0
36000
72000
t/Tp
108000
144000
180000
3
a/ap
2
1
1
e
0.5
0
180
ω(°)
0
-180
0
50
I(°)
25
0
5e+06
1e+07
t/Tp
1.5e+07
2e+07
2.5e+07
Figure 1. Typical time evolution of ejected orbits for the fastest (left panels) and slowest (right panels) drift rates. Time t is normalized to the planet's period
Tp. The semi-major axes' ratio of the particle's and the planet's a/ap is shown in the top panels, eccentricity e (solid red, left vertical axis) and Inclination
(dashed green, right vertical axis) in the middle panels and the argument of pericentre (solid red) in the bottom panels.
τ = 105, σ
e = 0.01
τ = 105, σ
e = 0.10
τ = 105, σ
e = 0.30
τ = 105, σ
e = 0.70
100
75
50
f
25
100
75
50
f
25
100
75
50
f
25
100
75
50
f
25
0
0
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
180
τ = 107, σ
e = 0.01
τ = 107, σ
e = 0.10
τ = 107, σ
e = 0.30
τ = 107, σ
e = 0.70
100
75
50
f
25
100
75
50
f
25
100
75
50
f
25
100
75
50
f
25
0
0
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
180
Figure 2. Main four outcome particle fractions f (in %) as a function of initial inclination for the fastest (top panels) and slowest (bottom panels) drift rates
and each eccentricity standard deviation σe. The curves correspond to capture (red +), ejection (green ∗), solar collision (blue ×) and stable resonance-free
particles (purple (cid:3)).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The numerical simulations in this work were performed at the Cen-
tre for Intensive Computing 'M´esocentre SIGAMM' hosted by the
Observatoire de la Cote dAzur.
Resonance capture at arbitrary inclination
7
Total capture fraction, σ
e = 0.01
Total capture fraction, σ
e = 0.10
Total capture fraction, σ
e = 0.30
Total capture fraction, σ
e=0.70
100
75
50
f
25
100
75
50
f
25
100
75
50
f
25
100
75
50
f
25
0
0
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
180
1:1 Resonance, σ
e = 0.01
1:1 Resonance, σ
e = 0.10
1:1 Resonance, σ
e = 0.30
1:1 Resonance, σ
e = 0.70
100
90
80
70
60
50
f
40
30
20
10
0
0
90
I0(°)
100
90
80
70
60
50
f
40
30
20
10
0
180
0
90
I0(°)
80
70
60
50
40
f
30
20
10
0
180
40
30
20
f
10
0
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
180
Figure 3. Total capture (upper row) and coorbital capture (lower row) fractions f as a function of initial inclination for the four eccentricity standard deviations
σe = 0.01, 0.10, 0.30, 0.70. In each panel, three curves are plotted corresponding to the drift rates: 105 yr (solid red +), 106 (dashed green ×), 107 (dotted
blue ⋆).
8
F. Namouni and M. H. M. Morais
100
90
80
70
60
50
f
40
30
20
10
0
10
f
1:2 Resonance, σ
e = 0.01
1:2 Resonance, σ
e = 0.10
1:2 Resonance, σ
e = 0.30
1:2 Resonance, σ
e = 0.70
100
90
80
70
60
50
f
40
30
20
10
0
180
0
90
I0(°)
90
80
70
60
50
f
40
30
20
10
0
180
0
90
I0(°)
60
50
40
30
f
20
10
0
0
0
90
I0(°)
180
90
I0(°)
180
2:3 Resonance, σ
e = 0.01
2:3 Resonance, σ
e = 0.10
2:3 Resonance, σ
e = 0.30
2:3 Resonance, σ
e = 0.70
30
20
f
10
20
10
f
30
20
f
10
0
0
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
180
5:6 Resonance, σ
e = 0.01
5:6 Resonance, σ
e = 0.10
5:6 Resonance, σ
e = 0.30
5:6 Resonance, σ
e = 0.70
40
30
20
f
10
30
20
f
10
30
20
f
10
20
10
f
0
0
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
180
Figure 4. First-order outer resonance capture fractions. Color and symbol codes are the same as in Figure 1.
1:4 Resonance, σ
e = 0.01
1:4 Resonance, σ
e = 0.10
1:4 Resonance, σ
e = 0.30
1:4 Resonance, σ
e = 0.70
Resonance capture at arbitrary inclination
9
30
20
f
10
30
20
f
10
30
20
f
10
0
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
180
1:3 Resonance, σ
e = 0.01
1:3 Resonance, σ
e = 0.10
1:3 Resonance, σ
e = 0.30
1:3 Resonance, σ
e = 0.70
100
90
80
70
60
50
f
40
30
20
10
0
90
80
70
60
50
f
40
30
20
10
0
60
50
40
30
f
20
10
0
0
0
90
I0(°)
180
40
30
20
f
10
40
30
20
f
10
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
180
2:5 Resonance, σ
e = 0.01
2:5 Resonance, σ
e = 0.10
2:5 Resonance, σ
e = 0.30
2:5 Resonance, σ
e = 0.70
70
60
50
40
f
30
20
10
20
10
f
70
60
50
40
f
30
20
10
f
20
10
0
10
0
f
100
90
80
70
60
50
f
40
30
20
10
0
40
30
20
f
10
0
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
180
5:7 Resonance, σ
e = 0.01
5:7 Resonance, σ
e = 0.10
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
180
5:7 Resonance, σ
e = 0.30
5:7 Resonance, σ
e = 0.70
10
f
0
0
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
180
Figure 5. Second and third order outer resonance capture fractions. Color and symbol codes are the same as in Figure 1.
10
F. Namouni and M. H. M. Morais
1:5 Resonance, σ
e = 0.01
1:5 Resonance, σ
e = 0.10
1:5 Resonance, σ
e = 0.30
1:5 Resonance, σ
e = 0.70
20
10
f
30
20
f
10
40
30
20
f
10
0
0
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
90
80
70
60
50
f
40
30
20
10
0
180
0
90
I0(°)
180
3:7 Resonance, σ
e = 0.01
3:7 Resonance, σ
e = 0.10
3:7 Resonance, σ
e = 0.30
3:7 Resonance, σ
e = 0.70
30
20
f
10
30
20
f
10
30
20
f
10
20
10
f
0
0
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
180
Figure 6. Fourth order outer resonance capture fractions. Color and symbol codes are the same as in Figure 1.
Resonance capture at arbitrary inclination
11
6:5 Resonance, σ
e = 0.01
6:5 Resonance, σ
e = 0.10
6:5 Resonance, σ
e = 0.30
6:5 Resonance, σ
e = 0.70
20
10
f
20
10
f
30
20
f
10
20
10
f
0
0
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
180
5:4 Resonance, σ
e = 0.01
5:4 Resonance, σ
e = 0.10
5:4 Resonance, σ
e = 0.30
5:4 Resonance, σ
e = 0.70
30
20
f
10
30
20
f
10
20
10
f
20
10
f
0
0
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
180
3:2 Resonance, σ
e = 0.01
3:2 Resonance, σ
e = 0.10
3:2 Resonance, σ
e = 0.30
3:2 Resonance, σ
e = 0.70
20
10
f
30
20
f
10
20
10
f
20
10
f
0
0
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
180
2:1 Resonance, σ
e = 0.01
2:1 Resonance, σ
e = 0.10
2:1 Resonance, σ
e = 0.30
2:1 Resonance, σ
e = 0.70
40
30
20
f
10
30
20
f
10
40
30
20
f
10
30
20
f
10
0
0
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
180
Figure 7. First order inner resonance capture fractions. Color and symbol codes are the same as in Figure 1.
12
F. Namouni and M. H. M. Morais
7:5 Resonance, σ
e = 0.01
7:5 Resonance, σ
e = 0.10
7:5 Resonance, σ
e = 0.30
7:5 Resonance, σ
e = 0.70
30
20
f
10
30
20
f
10
30
20
f
10
20
10
f
0
0
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
180
5:3 Resonance, σ
e = 0.01
5:3 Resonance, σ
e = 0.10
5:3 Resonance, σ
e = 0.30
5:3 Resonance, σ
e = 0.70
30
20
f
10
30
20
f
10
30
20
f
10
20
10
f
0
0
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
180
9:5 Resonance, σ
e = 0.01
9:5 Resonance, σ
e = 0.10
9:5 Resonance, σ
e = 0.30
9:5 Resonance, σ
e = 0.70
50
40
30
f
20
10
50
40
30
f
20
10
50
40
30
f
20
10
30
20
f
10
0
0
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
180
7:3 Resonance, σ
e = 0.01
7:3 Resonance, σ
e = 0.10
7:3 Resonance, σ
e = 0.30
7:3 Resonance, σ
e = 0.70
30
20
f
10
40
30
20
f
10
30
20
f
10
0
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
180
3:1 Resonance, σ
e = 0.01
3:1 Resonance, σ
e = 0.10
3:1 Resonance, σ
e = 0.30
3:1 Resonance, σ
e = 0.70
10
f
30
20
f
10
20
10
f
60
50
40
30
f
20
10
0
50
40
30
f
20
10
0
0
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
180
Figure 8. Higher order inner resonance capture fractions. Color and symbol codes are the same as in Figure 1.
5:2 Resonance, σ
e = 0.01
5:2 Resonance, σ
e = 0.10
5:2 Resonance, σ
e = 0.30
5:2 Resonance, σ
e = 0.70
Resonance capture at arbitrary inclination
13
100
90
80
70
60
50
f
40
30
20
10
0
50
40
30
f
20
10
0
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
90
80
70
60
50
f
40
30
20
10
0
180
50
40
30
f
20
10
0
90
I0(°)
0
0
180
90
I0(°)
180
Figure 9. Capture fraction f of the 5:2 inner resonance. Color and symbol codes are the same as in Figure 1.
14
F. Namouni and M. H. M. Morais
REFERENCES
Wisdom J., 1983, Icarus, 56, 51
Bailey B. L., Malhotra R., 2009, Icarus, 203, 155
Borderies N., Goldreich P., 1984, Celestial Mechanics, 32, 127
Engels J. R., Henrard J., 1994, Celestial Mechanics and Dynami-
cal Astronomy, 58, 215
Fern´andez J. A., Gallardo T., Young J. D., 2016, Mon. Not. R.
Astron. Soc. , 461, 3075
Gronchi G. F., Milani A., 1999, Astron. Astrophys. , 341, 928
Henrard J., 1982, Celestial Mechanics, 27, 3
Henrard J., de Vleeschauwer A., 1988, Celestial Mechanics, 43,
99
Henrard J., Moons M., 1992, Icarus, 95, 244
Katz B., Dong S., Malhotra R., 2011, Physical Review Letters,
107, 181101
Kozai Y., 1962, Astron. J. , 67, 591
Lemaitre A., 1984, Celestial Mechanics, 32, 109
Lidov M. L., 1962, Plan. Space Sci. , 9, 719
Lithwick Y., Naoz S., 2011, Astrophys. J. , 742, 94
Morais M. H. M., Giuppone C. A., 2012, Mon. Not. R. Astron.
Soc. , 424, 52
Morais M. H. M., Namouni F., 2013, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. ,
436, L30
Morais M. H. M., Namouni F., 2016, Celestial Mechanics and
Dynamical Astronomy, 125, 91
Murray C. D., Dermott S. F., 1999, Solar system dynamics. Cam-
bridge University Press
Namouni F., Morais M. H. M., 2015, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. ,
446, 1998
Poincar´e H., 1902, Bulletin Astronomique, Serie I, 19, 289
Quillen A. C., 2006, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , 365, 1367
Volk K., Malhotra R., 2013, Icarus, 224, 66
Wisdom J., 1980, Astron. J. , 85, 1122
Wisdom J., 1982, Astron. J. , 87, 577
|
1706.01413 | 1 | 1706 | 2017-06-05T16:43:00 | Measuring the meteoroid environments of the planets with meteor detectors on Earth | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | We describe how meteors recorded at the Earth can be used to partly reconstruct the meteoroid environments of the planets if a large sample (i.e. millions of orbits at a minimum) is available. The process involves selecting from the Earth-based sample those meteors which passed near a planet's orbit prior to arriving at the Earth, and so carry information about the planetary meteoroid environment. Indeed this process can be extended to any location in the Solar System, though some regions of space are better sampled than others.
From such a reconstruction performed with data from the Canadian Meteor Orbit Radar (CMOR), we reveal that Mars has apex, helion, anti-helion and toroidal sporadic sources, much as Earth does. Such reconstructions, albeit partial, have the potential to provide a wealth of detail about planetary meteoroid environments, and to allow for the ground-truthing of model meteoroid populations without in situ sampling. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | Draft version September 17, 2018
Typeset using LATEX default style in AASTeX61
MEASURING THE METEOROID ENVIRONMENTS OF THE PLANETS WITH METEOR DETECTORS ON
EARTH
Paul Wiegert,1, 2 Peter Brown,1, 2 Petr Pokorny,3 Karina Lenartowicz,1 and Zbyszek Krzeminski1
1Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Western Ontario London Canada
2Centre for Planetary Science and Exploration (CPSX), The University of Western Ontario London Canada
3Dept. of Physics, The Catholic University of America, Washington D.C., USA
(Received Jan 1, 2000; Revised Jan 1, 2000; Accepted Jan 1 2000)
Submitted to AJ
ABSTRACT
We describe how meteors recorded at the Earth can be used to partly reconstruct the meteoroid environments of
the planets if a large sample (i.e. millions of orbits at a minimum) is available. The process involves selecting from
the Earth-based sample those meteors which passed near a planet's orbit prior to arriving at the Earth, and so carry
information about the planetary meteoroid environment. Indeed this process can be extended to any location in the
Solar System, though some regions of space are better sampled than others.
From such a reconstruction performed with data from the Canadian Meteor Orbit Radar (CMOR), we reveal that
Mars has apex, helion, anti-helion and toroidal sporadic sources, much as Earth does. Such reconstructions, albeit
partial, have the potential to provide a wealth of detail about planetary meteoroid environments, and to allow for the
ground-truthing of model meteoroid populations without in situ sampling.
Keywords: meteorites, meteors, meteoroids - planets and satellites: general - comets: general
7
1
0
2
n
u
J
5
.
]
P
E
h
p
-
o
r
t
s
a
[
1
v
3
1
4
1
0
.
6
0
7
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
Corresponding author: Paul Wiegert
[email protected]
2
Wiegert et al.
1. INTRODUCTION
The meteoroid environment at the Earth has been measured over a large particle size range by a number of techniques,
while the environments of the other planets are much less well known. The difference is largely due to the fact that the
equipment used to measure meteors at Earth, such as camera networks and meteor radars, which use the atmosphere
as a detector cannot easily be transported and deployed on other planets by spacecraft.
Some dust measurements have been performed of the meteoroid environment away from the Earth, (Staubach et al.
2002). However, these are primarily in-situ measurements by spacecraft impact detectors and therefore limited to
small collecting areas. As recent examples, the Cosmic Dust Detector on the Cassini spacecraft at Saturn (Srama et al.
2004; Kempf et al. 2004), and the Student Dust Counter on the New Horizons mission to Pluto (Hor´anyi et al. 2008;
Poppe et al. 2010; Szalay et al. 2013) both have sensitive areas of only 0.1 m2. They are therefore unable to sample
particles much larger than a few microns. In contrast, ground-based meteor detectors might monitor thousands of
square km of sky or more e.g. ∼ 106 km2 for the European Fireball Network (Oberst et al. 1998).
Several works have predicted the existence of meteor showers on other planets based on known comet/meteoroid
stream orbits (eg. (Christou 2010),(Selsis et al. 2004)) with close nodal points to other planetary orbits. However,
observations of planetary meteoroid environments other than Earth at sizes larger than a few microns are limited to a
short optical survey at Mars (Domokos et al. 2007), individual impacts in the Jovian atmosphere (Hueso & al. 2013)
and indirect inference of meteoroid impacts on Mercury based on exospheric gas measurements (Christou et al. 2015).
Here we report on a technique that allows us to study the meteoroid environment at a planet in our solar system
directly from Earth. This works for any solar system planet, and indeed arbitrary locations in interplanetary space.
It uses the same equipment as Earth-based meteor studies, whether camera, radar or otherwise. It simply involves
selecting from the observed terrestrial meteoroid orbit sample those particles which passed near the orbit of another
planet prior to arriving at Earth. Particles which pass near a planet before arriving at Earth are de facto part
of that planet's meteoroid environment, and recognizing them as such, we can partially reconstruct the planetary
meteoroid environment (PME) through inversion of these carefully chosen meteoroid orbits as observed at Earth.
An important obstacle for this technique is the small number of meteoroids travelling from the vicinity of any given
planet to the Earth. As a result, a necessary condition for this technique to be useful is a large sample of measured
meteoroid orbits . We can improve our sampling if we are willing to assume that the meteoroid environment of the
planets is approximately azimuthally symmetric about its orbit: this is known to be approximately true for the Earth
(Campbell-Brown & Jones 2006). In this case, the sample of meteoroids measured at Earth which pass sufficiently
near the orbit of a given planet (rather than those which pass sufficient near the planet itself) provides a proxy for
the time averaged PME. Given sufficient numbers of meteoroid orbits, we will show that such a sub-sampling provides
useful information on PMEs, and show that from it we can predict (as just one example) that features in the spatial
radiant distribution at Mars are reminiscent of those seen in the sporadic distribution at Earth.
This approach is not without its limitations: geometrical restrictions arise from the need for the meteoroid orbit
to pass near both the planet in question and the Earth. We also need a very large sample of meteors to get usable
statistics. Here the Canadian Meteor Orbit Radar (CMOR, Webster et al. (2004)) which measured over 4.3 million
meteors orbits in the interval 2011-2014 is the sample that will be used. Even with this vast data set, only a small
fraction (∼ 1%) are useable for our purposes: a smaller data set will scarcely do. Nonetheless, partial data is better
than none, and provides a first look at what otherwise would remain undetected entirely.
2. METHOD
Our intent here is to provide a proof of concept and present an initial reconnaissance of what portions of the
planetary meteoroid environments can be sampled from Earth, and what they look like in their broad strokes. The
key to this technique is determining which of the CMOR meteoroid orbits passed near the orbit of another planet prior
to its detection at Earth. The CMOR meteor patrol radar has been described elsewhere (Webster et al. 2004). Here
we will use the data measured from CMOR since 2011, as this is the time period after which a total of six-stations
began operation (Brown et al. 2012) from an original network of three and hence the precision of orbits is significantly
better on the average since 2011. To determine whether a given meteoroid orbit is part of another planet's PME,
we compute the Minimum Orbital Intersection Distance (MOID) between its pre-atmospheric orbit and the planet's
osculating orbit. If the MOID is less than a particular value (which varies by planet), we will consider it part of our
PME sample. The values chosen here are of the same order as the planetary Hill spheres: 0.01 AU for the terrestrial
Planetary meteoroid environments
3
planets, and 1 AU for the outer planets. For this initial study, we will ignore the effects of instrumental error on the
MOID calculation, though inclusion of uncertainties could be used to refine the calculated PME.
The sample of CMOR meteoroids that passed near a planet's orbit prior to its arrival at Earth gives us a first look
at the planetary meteoroid environment. To obtain a more quantitative result, we have to consider the efficiency with
which particles can travel from the planets to us. There are at least two parts to this calculation.
The first relates to the fraction of meteoroid orbits that have a geometry suitable to reach the Earth; the second
has to do with the 'field of view' of the radar itself, which cannot observe all radiants which reach our planet. These
biases will be addressed in the next two subsections.
2.1. Meteoroid orbital transfer efficiency from the planets to Earth
Some orbits passing near the planet's orbit can reach the Earth, others cannot on purely geometrical grounds. To
examine this, we analyse a random sample of hypothetical meteoroids passing near each of the planets to determine
which can reach the Earth afterwards. This work is a simple extension of the scattering work done as part of Wiegert
(2014), and allows an assessment of how much of a PME we can hope to sample under ideal conditions.
We will use the planet Mars as an example here for concreteness. If we imagine all possible radiant directions and
speeds on Mars' meteor sky, some would (if they weren't destroyed by their encounter with Mars) go on to reach the
Earth. We can compute numerically which of these radiants could have been sampled at Earth, to get a picture of
the portion of Mars' meteor sky we can in principle sample. We refer to the function defining whether or not a given
radiant at Mars can reach Earth as the Transfer Function (TF).
To compute the TF, one million hypothetical meteoroids at Mars are created with radiants that are drawn randomly
on Mars' sky, and for each a speed is randomly drawn from a uniform distribution between zero and the heliocentric
escape speed at Mars. The fraction of these that could reach Earth are counted. The criterion for reaching Earth is
that the meteoroid orbit have a node between 0.9 and 1.1 AU from the Sun or that its heliocentric inclination be less
than 3◦ or more than 177◦. The inclination choice used is based on the size of the Earth's Hill sphere, 0.01 AU, which
subtends an angle of 3◦ when seen from the Sun. The addition of the inclination criterion is a first order attempt to
account for the fact that meteors with orbits very nearly in the plane of Earth's orbit can strike our planet even if they
do not have a node near 1 AU; a more sophisticated criterion based on the MOID could be used, but is unlikely to
affect the results significantly. A plot of the TF for Mars, that is the meteor radiants at Mars which can reach Earth,
is in the top panel of Fig. 1.
Each pixel in the top panel of Fig. 1 represents the fraction of meteors that arrive at Mars from a particular radiant,
and which subsequently can reach Earth. Note that the radiants in Fig. 1 are not the meteor's radiants at Earth
(which are different) but those they would have had at the planet itself had they struck it.
Any regions in white in Fig. 1 represent 'forbidden regions' in that no meteors at any speed considered here can
travel from the planet to the Earth, and so we are inherently blind to these radiant zones. The meteoroids at Mars
which have Martian radiants in the ecliptic plane are the best sampled at Earth, however, there are numerous radiants
at higher ecliptic latitudes that are also accessible. If Mars has six sporadic meteor sources similar to those at Earth
(Jones & Brown 1993), The top panel of Fig. 1 indicates that we can expect to sample all of them at Earth, though
many only at a very low level (∼ 5%). Nonetheless, this provides a first important result from this work: meteor
detectors on Earth have access to a fraction of the meteoroid environment at Mars and in fact, at the other planets as
well, as will be described later.
Our transfer efficiency is idealized for simplicity. It assumes that both the Earth and Mars are on circular orbits, that
the meteoroid was not appreciably deflected by the planet when it passed it, and that the intersection criterion described
above is applicable. Though reasonable approximations, they are not perfect and as a result we will occasionally find
that CMOR meteors are detected from these forbidden regions, but these discrepancies do not affect our broader
argument.
The TFs for other planets are also shown in the lower panels of Figure 1. The fraction of meteors which can reach
Earth from each of the planet's PME is in Table 1 and ranges from 9.0% at Mars down to 2.8% for Mercury. Thus
a wide range of radiants across a planet's meteor sky are in principle accessible from Earth. As a rule, the ecliptic
plane is always best sampled, as the geometrical intersection constraint is easier to satisfy. The apex region (near the
zero of the apex-centered ecliptic latitude and longitude) is often completely inaccessible, but much of the rest of the
planet's meteor sky is sampled at some level.
4
Wiegert et al.
)
g
e
d
(
e
d
u
t
i
t
a
l
c
i
t
p
i
l
c
E
Mars
75
60
45
30
−180
−150
−120
−90
−60
−30
0
30
60
90
120
150
15
180
−15
−30
−45
−60
−75
Ecliptic longitude relative to Mars's apex (deg)
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Mercury
75
60
45
30
−180
−150
−120
−90
−60
−30
0
30
60
90
120
150
15
180
−15
−30
−45
−60
−75
Ecliptic longitude relative to Mercury's apex (deg)
Saturn
75
60
45
30
−180
−150
−120
−90
−60
−30
0
30
60
90
120
150
15
180
−15
−30
−45
−60
−75
)
g
e
d
(
e
d
u
t
i
t
a
l
c
i
t
p
i
l
c
E
)
g
e
d
(
e
d
u
t
i
t
a
l
c
i
t
p
i
l
c
E
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
)
g
e
d
(
e
d
u
t
i
t
a
l
c
i
t
p
i
l
c
E
)
g
e
d
(
e
d
u
t
i
t
a
l
c
i
t
p
i
l
c
E
Venus
75
60
45
30
−180
−150
−120
−90
−60
−30
0
30
60
90
120
150
15
180
−15
−30
−45
−60
−75
Ecliptic longitude relative to Venus's apex (deg)
Uranus
75
60
45
30
−180
−150
−120
−90
−60
−30
0
30
60
90
120
150
15
180
−15
−30
−45
−60
−75
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
)
g
e
d
(
e
d
u
t
i
t
a
l
c
i
t
p
i
l
c
E
)
g
e
d
(
e
d
u
t
i
t
a
l
c
i
t
p
i
l
c
E
Jupiter
75
60
45
30
−180
−150
−120
−90
−60
−30
0
30
60
90
120
150
15
180
−15
−30
−45
−60
−75
Ecliptic longitude relative to Jupiter's apex (deg)
Neptune
75
60
45
30
−180
−150
−120
−90
−60
−30
0
30
60
90
120
150
15
180
−15
−30
−45
−60
−75
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Ecliptic longitude relative to Saturn's apex (deg)
Ecliptic longitude relative to Uranus's apex (deg)
Ecliptic longitude relative to Neptune's apex (deg)
Figure 1. The meteor sky at each planet colour-coded by the fraction of radiants which can reach the Earth, in apex-centered
coordinates. The apex of the planet's way is in the center; the Sun is at −90◦ longitude, and opposition at +90◦. White regions
indicate radiants for which less than 0.1% of the possible speeds can reach Earth.
The idealized TF described above allows us to assess how much of the available phase space can be measured from
Earth. Also interesting is the fraction of the populated phase space at each planet which can reach Earth. This is,
of course, unknown at this time but we can use a model of each planet's meteoroid environment as a proxy. Here we
use the planetary meteoroid environment model of Wiegert et al. (2009), a physics-based self-consistent model of the
near-Earth meteoroid environment calibrated to CMOR data. Though constructed specifically for Earth, the model
contains information on the PME's of all the planets. The terrestrial planets will be reasonably well-represented by
this model, but it was not designed for the outer planets. The fraction of each model PME which can be sampled
at Earth is in line 2 of Table 1. Here we see that the Wiegert et al. (2009) model predictions suggest an even larger
fraction of the terrestrial PMEs are accessible to us than was suggested by our uniform model : 9% for Mercury, 14%
for Mars and 24% for Venus. The fraction is reduced for the outer planets, to between 1-3% in all cases.
Planetary meteoroid environments
5
We conclude that planetary PMEs can be measured at a significant level from Earth, given a sufficiently large
sample of meteoroid orbits. In particular, these measurements offer the possibility of 'ground-truthing' and calibrating
dynamical models of PMEs without in situ measurements.
2.2. The observational geometry from the CMOR radar
Having assessed in the previous section that a reconstruction of PMEs is possible in principle, we turn to the
observing biases that affect this process. Located in the northern hemisphere, CMOR (43◦16′ N, 80◦46′ W) can only
see meteors arriving from certain directions. CMOR has a nearly all-sky gain pattern, which means that most radiants
which get above the local horizon have some detectability throughout the day. Due to this broad beam pattern, the
time-weighted radiant collecting area is purely a function of declination as discusssed in Campbell-Brown & Jones
(2006). To determine the effect of this on our sample, we calculate the relative collecting area f of the radar as a
function of the radiant declination of the arriving meteor. Here we take f to be the time average over the year of the
cosine of the angle between a given apparent meteor radiant and the local vertical at the radar site, with any negative
values (radiant below the horizon) taken to be zero. Thus a radiant that was never above CMOR's horizon would
have f = 0. In practice, a radiant at the North equatorial Pole has the highest effective value at sin(43◦16′) = 0.69, a
result also found in Campbell-Brown & Jones (2006)(see their Fig 6.).
A weighting of 1/f is then applied to that meteor to allow for the radar's time-integrated collecting area for that
radiant. Radiants with f = 0 are not weighted; they cannot be measured with CMOR but are designated 'inaccessible'
(see next section).
There are other observing biases which generically affect back-scatter radar measurements of meteors (Galligan & Baggaley
2004). For CMOR the most important is the echo height ceiling (which reduces sensitivity to higher speed meteoroids
eg. (Campbell-Brown & Jones 2003)) and the ionization efficiency, which reduces detectability of slower meteoroids
(Ye et al. 2016), favoring detection of larger, slower meteoroids. Though these are important for the construction of the
best possible PME, here we ignore these effects for simplicity, as our efforts here are towards a proof of concept rather
than a high-precision result. Moreover, these effects tend to be size dependent and as we do not use size-frequency
distribution in any of our models, as long as CMOR can detect some fraction of the population from any radiant we
can use it to probe other PMEs. We also note that we adopt a simple frequentist approach to debiasing the sample
here, but Bayesian techniques are likely to perform better when a more complete reconstruction of planetary meteoroid
environments is attempted.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Meteoroid environments at the planets
In order to reconstruct the planetary meteoroid environments, each CMOR meteoroid deemed to have arrived from
a PME is assigned a weight inversely proportional to the relative collecting area of the radar. No correction for
the transfer function is applied because the correct TF to apply depends on the PME in question, which is a priori
unknown. We do note that the sporadic meteor sources are known to have very broad speed distributions at the Earth
(Jones & Brown 1993) and so a correction based on the uniform TF might be correct to zeroth order. A more accurate
approach could involve comparison with a model distribution and/or 'best-fit' approach but this is beyond the scope
of this paper: our intent here is simply to provide a first look at what can be recovered about PMEs from Earth-based
samples.
To present our results, we again use Mars as our prototype. The reconstructed radiant distribution at this planet is
shown in the top panel of Fig. 2, from 38178 CMOR meteors collected from 2011-2014 (about 1 % of the total) whose
orbits, when traced backward, have MOIDs with 0.01 AU of Mars' orbit.
The most prominent features are the Martian helion and anti-helion sporadic sources, the regions at zero latitude
near −90◦ and +90◦ in apex-centered longitude respectively. The north and south toroidal sporadic sources, at ±60◦
latitude and zero longitude on Earth are well-measured. In fact the south toroidal source is quite distinct in the figure.
The north toroidal source, which is comparable in strength to the southern on Earth, is absent. However, this is likely
a selection effect due to the geometrical constraint of having a node both at Mars and the Earth. CMOR is in Earth's
northern hemisphere and detects meteoroids which are mostly at their descending node at Earth. These same particles
are at their ascending node at Mars, and hence strike it from the south. Given the near mirror symmetry around
the ecliptic plane of the Earth's PME, it is likely that Mars does in fact have north and south toroidal sources of
comparable strength. The northern toroidal source cannot be said to be weaker based solely on these measurements,
6
Wiegert et al.
rather we would contend that CMOR's sensitivity to the Mars northern toroidal source is much less. Clearly it would
be advantageous to combine meteor data sets obtained from Earth's north and south hemispheres (e.g. Pokorn´y et al.
(2017)) to provide a better picture.
The apex sources near zero longitude and latitude are mostly inaccessible, in a region where the TF is zero, but
are sampled much better along the ecliptic. The apex sources on Earth are associated with retrograde meteors and
hence with the highest speeds relative to the planet. The top panel of Fig. 3 shows the speed distribution at Mars. At
the Earth, the overall speed distribution has two peaks, one at 30 km/s and one at 55 km/s (Taylor 1995; Sato et al.
2000; Close et al. 2002; Janches et al. 2003; Galligan & Baggaley 2004; Hunt et al. 2004; Chau & Woodman 2004;
Chau et al. 2007; Janches et al. 2008; Wiegert et al. 2009). The higher speed peak is associated with the apex sources.
The fact that the distribution at Mars shows two similar peaks indicates that our technique encompasses a broad
subset of the PME. In particular, the presence of the small higher-speed peak in the top panel of Fig. 3 near 50 km/s
at Mars confirms that we can sample a subset of the high-speed Martian apex sporadic meteoroid population at Earth.
From these results, we predict with some confidence that Mars has helion, anti-helion and south toroidal sporadic
sources, and probably a north toroidal source. The apex sources are not evident in the radiant map, but the speed
distribution suggests that they are being sampled, albeit much more thinly, likely due to the low TF.
The meteoroid environment for the other planets , indeed for any location within the Solar System, can be recon-
structed in the same manner. Here we present the results for the radiant distributions at the other planets in Figure 2,
and the speed distributions in Figure 3. These are reconstructed from samples with sizes ranging from the lowest at
2072 meteors for Neptune to the largest at 156054 meteors for Jupiter, or 0.05% to 3.6% respectively of the 4.3 million
meteors collected by CMOR from 2011 to 2014. We emphasize that this represents only part of the PME at each
planet. However, the fact that there are radiants which are accessible through high TF at Earth from a given planet
but not represented in CMOR measurements is an important constraint not previously known for different PMEs.
For the other terrestrial planets, the sporadic radiant features seen resemble those for Mars. There are prominent
helion and anti-helion sporadic sources near ±90◦ from the apex, with a strong band stretching through the apex
sources. The toroidal regions are less distinct but represented. The speed distributions show a clear bi-modality, again
very similar to what is observed at Earth.
For the giant planets, we see meteors only in the region around the apex source, and there is a clear concentration
of orbits in the ecliptic plane. Though portions of the helion and toroidal sources are notionally observable we don't
see any meteors from these regions for any of the outer planets. However, we recall that the white regions in Fig. 2
are those where meteors at some speed from zero to the heliocentric escape speed could reach us, not necessarily those
speeds which are actually populated at these planets. Thus the absence of toroidal or helion sources from these figures
is not enough to conclude that there are no such meteors at the planet's themselves. They may exist but at speeds
which result in orbits that do not reach us at Earth. In a similar vein, the density enhancements of radiants shown in
Fig 2 are subject to the same biases, and could be significantly affected by the absence from our sample of the meteor
component which simply cannot reach the Earth. This geometrical constraint that we can only measure orbits passing
near both the Earth and our planet means that the measurement of some components of PMEs will necessarily have
to await in situ measurements.
4. CONCLUSIONS
Examination of the phase space in the meteoroid environments for each of the planets reveals that a few to several
percent of the meteoroids which have orbits passing close to other planetary orbits in the solar system can reach the
Earth. From this we conclude that some measurement of these environments is possible with Earth-based equipment,
if we can obtain a sufficiently large sample; and that calibration and ground-truthing of model meteoroid environments
is possible in principle, without the need to measure the planetary environment in situ.
A large sample of CMOR radar meteors observed at the Earth was then examined to find those which are also part
of the meteoroid environments of other planets, and a partial meteoroid environment was reconstructed for each of
the planets. Though only partial, it allows us to predict features similar to the sporadic meteor sources observed at
Earth in the environments of Mars and the other terrestrial planets. For the outer planets, high-speed retrograde
meteors from their apex sources are the best sampled. From CMOR observations of the meteoroid environment at
Earth and our model, we predict a concentration of radiants in the ecliptic, but we have much sparser information on
the existence of helion, anti-helion or toroidal sporadic sources.
Planetary meteoroid environments
7
Mars
75
60
45
30
−180
−150
−120
−90
−60
−30
0
30
60
90
120
150
15
180
−15
−30
−45
−60
−75
based on 38174 CMOR meteors
Ecliptic longitude relative to Mars's apex (deg)
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
)
g
e
d
(
e
d
u
t
i
t
a
l
c
i
t
p
i
l
c
E
)
g
e
d
(
e
d
u
t
i
t
a
l
c
i
t
p
i
l
c
E
)
g
e
d
(
e
d
u
t
i
t
a
l
c
i
t
p
i
l
c
E
Mercury
75
60
45
30
−180
−150
−120
−90
−60
−30
0
30
60
90
120
150
15
180
−15
−30
−45
−60
−75
based on 48979 CMOR meteors
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
)
g
e
d
(
e
d
u
t
i
t
a
l
c
i
t
p
i
l
c
E
Venus
75
60
45
30
−180
−150
−120
−90
−60
−30
0
30
60
90
120
150
15
180
−15
−30
−45
−60
−75
based on 68843 CMOR meteors
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
)
g
e
d
(
e
d
u
t
i
t
a
l
c
i
t
p
i
l
c
E
Jupiter
75
60
45
30
−180
−150
−120
−90
−60
−30
0
30
60
90
120
150
15
180
−15
−30
−45
−60
−75
based on 156054 CMOR meteors
Ecliptic longitude relative to Mercury's apex (deg)
Ecliptic longitude relative to Venus's apex (deg)
Ecliptic longitude relative to Jupiter's apex (deg)
Saturn
75
60
45
30
−180
−150
−120
−90
−60
−30
0
30
60
90
120
150
15
180
−15
−30
−45
−60
−75
based on 29072 CMOR meteors
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
)
g
e
d
(
e
d
u
t
i
t
a
l
c
i
t
p
i
l
c
E
Uranus
75
60
45
30
−180
−150
−120
−90
−60
−30
0
30
60
90
120
150
15
180
−15
−30
−45
−60
−75
based on 5514 CMOR meteors
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
)
g
e
d
(
e
d
u
t
i
t
a
l
c
i
t
p
i
l
c
E
Neptune
75
60
45
30
−180
−150
−120
−90
−60
−30
0
30
60
90
120
150
15
180
−15
−30
−45
−60
−75
based on 2072 CMOR meteors
Ecliptic longitude relative to Saturn's apex (deg)
Ecliptic longitude relative to Uranus's apex (deg)
Ecliptic longitude relative to Neptune's apex (deg)
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 2. Radiant distribution of CMOR-detected meteors at Earth which pass within 0.01 AU of the terrestrial planets' orbits
(1 AU for outer planets), in apex-centered ecliptic coordinates at the planet. The scale is the base-10 logarithm of the weighted
number of meteors at each radiant. The apex of the planet's way is in the center; the Sun is at −90◦ longitude, and opposition
at +90◦. Pixels in grey indicate forbidden regions from which less than 1% of possible speeds from those radiants can reach the
Earth (i.e. the TF is less than 0.01); white pixels indicate radiants for which at least some meteors could reach the Earth (i.e.
the TF is greater than 0.01) but none are observed by CMOR.
Thus the first measurements of the meteoroid environments of the planets have now been made. In future works,
through more careful corrections for the observational biases, larger CMOR datasets and higher fidelity modelling we
believe the construction of well-calibrated models of other planetary meteoroid environments is possible.
PGB wishes to thank the Canada Research Chair program. This work was supported in part by the Natural Sciences
and Engineering Research Council of Canada and NASA's Meteoroid Environment Office (MEO) through co-operative
agreement NNX15AC94A.
REFERENCES
Brown, P. G., Weryk, R. J., Wong, D. K., &
Campbell-Brown, M. D., & Jones, J. 2003, Monthly Notices
Campbell-Brown, M. D. 2012, in AAS/Division for
Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 44,
AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts,
302.04
of the Royal Astronomical Society, 343, 775.
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/2003MNRAS.343..775C
8
Wiegert et al.
r
e
b
m
u
n
e
v
i
t
l
a
e
r
0
0
0
5
2
0
0
0
5
1
0
0
0
5
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
speed (km/s) of Mercury meteors at Mercury
r
e
b
m
u
n
e
v
i
t
l
a
e
r
r
e
b
m
u
n
e
v
i
t
l
a
e
r
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
speed (km/s) of Mars meteors at Mars
20
40
60
80
speed (km/s) of Venus meteors at Venus
r
e
b
m
u
n
e
v
i
t
l
a
e
r
r
e
b
m
u
n
e
v
i
t
l
a
e
r
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
5
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
5
0
5
10
15
20
25
speed (km/s) of Jupiter meteors at Jupiter
0
0
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
5
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
5
0
r
e
b
m
u
n
e
v
i
t
l
a
e
r
r
e
b
m
u
n
e
v
i
t
l
a
e
r
5
10
15
20
6
8
10
12
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
speed (km/s) of Saturn meteors at Saturn
speed (km/s) of Uranus meteors at Uranus
speed (km/s) of Neptune meteors at Neptune
Figure 3. Meteoroid speed distribution, showing the speeds that would be measured at the planet, based on those CMOR
meteors detected at Earth which intersect the planet's orbit.
Campbell-Brown, M. D., & Jones, J. 2006, MNRAS, 367,
Chau, J. L., Woodman, R. F., & Galindo, F. 2007, Icarus,
709
188, 162
Campbell-Brown, M. D., & Jones, J. 2006, Monthly Notices
Christou, A. A. 2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal
of the Royal Astronomical Society, 367, 709.
Astronomical Society, 402, 2759.
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09974.x
http://blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16097.x
Chau, J. L., & Woodman, R. F. 2004, Atmos. Chem. Phys,
Christou, A. A., Killen, R. M., & Burger, M. H. 2015,
4, 511
Geophysical Research Letters, 1
Close, S., Oppenheim, M., Hunt, S., & Dyrud, L. 2002,
Poppe, A., James, D., Jacobsmeyer, B., & Hor´anyi, M.
Planetary meteoroid environments
9
Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 107,
1295
Domokos, A., Bell, J., Brown, P. G., et al. 2007, Icarus,
191, 141.
2010, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L11101
Sato, T., Nakamura, T., & Nishimura, K. 2000, IEICE
Trans. Commun., E83-B(9), 1990
Selsis, F., Brillet, J., & Rapaport, M. 2004, Astronomy and
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0019103507001923
Galligan, D. P., & Baggaley, W. 2004, Monthly Notices of
Astrophysics, 789, 783.
the Royal Astronomical Society,
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08078.x
Galligan, D. P., & Baggaley, W. J. 2004, MNRAS, 353, 422
Hor´anyi, M., Hoxie, V., James, D., et al. 2008, Space Sci.
Rev., 140, 387
Hueso, R., & al., E. 2013, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 55, 1.
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A{%}26A...560A..55H
Hunt, S. M., Oppenheim, M., Close, S., et al. 2004, Icarus,
168, 34
http://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2004/11/aa3952/aa3952.html
Srama, R., Ahrens, T. J., Altobelli, N., et al. 2004, Space
Sci. Rev., 114, 465
Staubach, P., Grun, E., & Matney, M. 2002, in
Interplanetary Dust, ed. E. Grun, B. Gustafson,
S. Dermott, & H. Fechtig (Springer Berlin Heidelberg),
346 -- 384
Szalay, J. R., Piquette, M., & Hor´anyi, M. 2013, Earth,
Janches, D., Close, S., & Fentzke, J. T. 2008, Icarus, 193,
Planets, and Space, 65, 1145
105
Janches, D., Nolan, M. C., Meisel, D. D., et al. 2003,
Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 108,
1222
Jones, J., & Brown, P. 1993, MNRAS, 265, 524
Kempf, S., Srama, R., Altobelli, N., et al. 2004, Icarus, 171,
317
Taylor, A. D. 1995, Icarus, 116, 154
Webster, A. R., Brown, P. G., Jones, J., Ellis, K. J., &
Campbell-Brown, M. 2004, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 1181
Wiegert, P., Vaubaillon, J., & Campbell-Brown, M. 2009,
Icarus, 201, 295
Wiegert, P. A. 2014, Icarus, 242, 112
Oberst, J., Molau, S., Heinlein, D., et al. 1998, Meteoritics
Ye, Q., Brown, P. G., & Pokorn´y, P. 2016, Mon. Not. R.
and Planetary Science, 33, 49
Pokorn´y, P., Janches, D., Brown, P. G., & Hormaechea,
J. L. 2017, Icarus, 290, 162
Astron. Soc, 462, 3511.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.07369
10
Wiegert et al.
Table 1. Percent of meteor radiants at a planet which reach Earth. Uniform refers to a random-on-the-sphere distribution of
radiants at all speeds from zero to the local heliocentric escape speed. WCBV09 uses the radiant and speed distribution from
the planetary meteoroid model of Wiegert et al. (2009).
Name
Mercury Venus Mars
Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune
Uniform (%)
WCBV09 (%)
2.8
8.7
5.2
9.0
23.7
14.4
6.2
2.0
5.5
1.3
4.3
1.3
3.5
2.6
|
1604.01069 | 1 | 1604 | 2016-04-04T21:33:49 | Studying the nucleus of comet 9P/Tempel 1 using the structure of the Deep Impact ejecta cloud at the early stages of its development | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | We present an attempt to extract information about the comet 9P/Tempel 1 nucleus from the characteristics of the ejecta cloud produced by the impactor of the Deep Impact mission. For this purpose we use two techniques. We first study the shadow cast on the nucleus surface by the ejecta cloud and investigate how areas of different brightness are related to the varying optical thickness or albedo of the ejecta cloud. The shadow was seen during the first 2.0 seconds after the impact (afterward it became obscured by the ejecta cloud). We have found that all brightness variations in the shadow are the result of the surface inhomogeneities, indicating that during first 2.0 seconds the ejecta cloud was homogeneous within the MRI spatial resolution. Our second technique is to study the obscuration of the nucleus limb by the ejecta. This study covers the period 0.76- 68.8 seconds after impact and is based on comparison of the ejecta cloud brightness on the limb and just beyond the limb. At this stage we do see inhomogeneities in the ejecta cloud that relate to the albedo and optical thickness variations in the ejected dust. Specifically, we have found two distinct bands of low optical thickness and one band of a high optical thickness. Based on crater formation ideas we estimate the depth of excavation of the ejected material for the found inhomogeneities and, thus, define a potential layering structure for the comet nucleus, Our estimates suggest that the low-optical thickness material was excavated from a depth of 15-18 and 30-32 meters in the case the porous nucleus material and 37-46 and 87-93 meters in the case of a non-porous nucleus material, and a layer of high optical thickness originated from the depth 9-11 m for porous material or 20-23 m for non-porous material. Based on the crater diameter estimates, we expect that the real depth of the layers is between these two cases. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | Studying the nucleus of comet 9P/Tempel 1 using the structure of
the Deep Impact ejecta cloud at the early stages of its development
Ludmilla Kolokolovaa, Lev Nagdimunova, Michael A'Hearna, Ashley Kingb ,
Michael Wolffc
aUniversity of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA,
bStanford University, 452 Lomita Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, USA,
cSpace Science Institute, 4750 Walnut Street, Boulder , CO 80301, USA
ACCEPTED by "Planetary and Space Science" on April 4, 2016.
Corresponding author:
Tel.: +1-301-405-1539
Fax.: +1-301-405-3538
Email address: [email protected] (L. Kolokolova).
1
Abstract
The paper presents an attempt to extract information about the comet 9P/Tempel 1 nucleus from
the characteristics of the ejecta cloud produced by the impactor of the Deep Impact mission. For
this purpose we use two techniques. We first study the shadow cast on the nucleus surface by the
ejecta cloud and investigate how areas of different brightness are related to the varying optical
thickness or albedo of the ejecta cloud. The shadow was seen during the first 2.0 seconds after
the impact (afterward it became obscured by the ejecta cloud). We have found that all brightness
variations in the shadow are the result of the surface inhomogeneities, indicating that during first
2.0 seconds the ejecta cloud was homogeneous within the MRI spatial resolution. Our second
technique is to study the obscuration of the nucleus limb by the ejecta. This study covers the
period 0.76- 68.8 seconds after impact and is based on comparison of the ejecta cloud brightness
on the limb and just beyond the limb. At this stage we do see inhomogeneities in the ejecta cloud
that relate to the albedo and optical thickness variations in the ejected dust. Specifically, we have
found two distinct bands of low optical thickness and one band of a high optical thickness. Based
on crater formation ideas we estimate the depth of excavation of the ejected material for the
found inhomogeneities and, thus, define a potential layering structure for the comet nucleus, Our
estimates suggest that the low-optical thickness material was excavated from a depth of 15 - 18
and 30 – 32 meters in the case the porous nucleus material and 37 - 46 and 87 - 93 meters in the
case of a non-porous nucleus material, and a layer of high optical thickness originated from the
depth 9-11 m for porous material or 20-23 m for non-porous material. Based on the crater
diameter estimates, we expect that the real depth of the layers is between these two cases. The
rest of the ejecta do not show any signs of layering but have significant azimuthal inhomogeneity
with clumps of high optical thickness and patterns of high albedo.
1. Introduction
The study of pristine materials from the comet interior was the main goal of the NASA space
mission Deep Impact (A'Hearn et al. 2005a, 2005b). Hundreds of images, obtained with a high
temporal and spatial resolution by the Deep Impact High and Medium Resolution Instruments,
showed how the cloud of the materials, excavated from the nucleus interior, was developing and
how its structure was changing with the time from impact. The amount of the ejected dust and its
change as the ejecta cloud was forming can provide information about the properties of the
nucleus material and the nucleus structure. For this reason, the Deep Impact (hereafter DI)
ground-based campaign included significant efforts to observe the DI ejecta cloud. The cloud
was first spatially resolved 20 minutes after impact by Earth-orbiting telescopes at visible and
UV wavelengths (Meech et al. 2005). Later ground-based telescopes worldwide imaged the
expanding cloud of dust and gas in the visible and infrared. The majority of the ground-based
data were obtained hours after impact. At this time, the difference in the velocities of the dust
particles mixed together the grains from different depths of the nucleus. Additionally, the dust
had already been altered by the solar radiation. Thus, there are no other data than in situ images
2
and spectra taken at early stages of the ejecta cloud development that allow us to see the most
unchanged and unsorted materials in their sequential appearance in the cloud from different
depth of the nucleus. The images of the cloud in the first minutes or even seconds after the
impact and the change in the cloud's brightness with time can provide a great source of
information not only about the spatial distribution and temporal changes in ejecta grains but also
the properties of fresh "parent" materials from the comet nucleus. In this paper we attempt to
extract properties of the ejecta grains using a sequence of in-situ images and by combining pre-
and post-impact images.
We will use two main approaches to analyze the data. Both of them measure the optical
thickness of the cloud and its change with time to allow us to obtain some idea about number
density and albedo of the dust particles. One of the approaches uses pre- and post-impact images
of the limb of the nucleus to determine its obscuration produced by the ejecta, providing the
optical depth of the cloud. The other approach uses the shadow that the optically thick part of the
cloud casts on the nucleus. These reveal not only properties of the pristine comet materials but
also their temporal and spatial variations, leading to a better understanding of the changes in
comet material with the depth, i.e. shedding light on the structure of comet nuclei. This study
allows an examination of the validity of the hypothesis about layered structure of comet nuclei
(Belton et al. 2007). This, in turn, helps us to understand the formation and evolution of Jupiter
Family comets, and improves our knowledge about the processes in protoplanetary nebulae.
2. Observations and their analysis
To study the change in the dust properties of the ejecta cloud with time we use images taken by
the Deep Impact Medium Resolution Instrument (MRI) that are available through the NASA
Planetary Data System, PDS (McLaughlin et al. 2014a). The images taken with the MRI are
available for many seconds before and after the impact, having a time resolution of 65 msec just
after impact with gradually greater spacing after impact as the ejecta are moving more slowly. In
this paper we study the data taken just before the impact and during the first 68.8 seconds after
the impact, thus limiting the change in geometry due to motion of the flyby spacecraft. The
instrument had a variety of filters (the filter wheel contained two clear apertures and eight other
filters, among them three narrow-band gas filters and the following dust filters: 345/6.8 nm,
526/5.6 nm, 750/100 nm, 950/100 nm; the numbers show the central wavelength and the
bandpass of the filters, see details in Hampton et al. 2005). However, we concentrate on the data
taken with the clear filter 650/ 700 nm as it provides the best signal-to-noise values. For our
study of the early stages of the ejecta development we will not worry about the gas
contamination: we have checked the data obtained with the gas filters and concluded that within
the considered time period the gas contamination was low. In some cases, specified below, we
also use selected Deep Impact High Resolution Instrument (HRI) images (McLaughlin et al.
2014b).
2.1 First two seconds after the impact: study of the ejecta shadow.
3
We measured the optical depth of the ejecta cloud and its spatial and temporal changes using the
shadow that the optically thick part of the cloud casts on the surface of the nucleus. A detailed
description of the shadow and its evolution with time can be found in Schultz et al. (2007) and
Richardson et al. (2007). Using images of the type shown in Fig. 1, we calculated the optical
depth of the cloud, comparing the brightness of the same part of the nucleus before the impact
and after, when it is in the shadow. The loss in the brightness of the surface due to shadowing
allows us to see how much light was blocked by the cloud, thus obtaining the optical depth of the
ejecta. A detailed radiative-transfer study of the ejecta cloud and its shadow was presented in
Nagdimunov et al. (2014). Using the package Hyperion (Robitalle 2011) we modeled one of the
HRI images (hv9000910_007, acquired 1.036 s after impact) trying to reproduce the correct
brightness of the ejecta cloud and the nucleus, including the shadowed area. The result of this
modeling allowed us to estimate the number density of the dust particles (1.5×104 particles/
cm3), their size distribution (power law with power 3 ranging particles of radius 0.1-100 micron)
and a dust/ice mass ratio that appeared to be 1-1.6 for the case of the individual particle density
of the dust material 0.4 g/cm3 and 3.6-21.6 for the case of the individual particle density 1.75
g/cm3.
The next step in our study was an analysis of the variations in the shadow brightness distribution,
which we believed indicated variations in the internal structure of the ejecta cloud. These
variations, in turn, could be either variations of the optical depth or the albedo of particles in the
ejecta plume and could provide information about the cratering process as well as properties of
the outer layers of the nucleus.
Figure 1. Left: HRI Image of the Tempel 1 nucleus with a shadow cast by the impact ejecta at time 1.036
s after impact. The dashed line shows the position of the scan we took through the shadow axis. Right:
HRI image of the ejecta 13 s after impact. The line shows approximate position of the nucleus limb. The
brightness of the ejecta on the limb and right beyond the limb is used in Section 2.2 to estimate the optical
depth of the ejecta.
4
From an initial analysis of the MRI post-impact images (we used the images from
mv9000910_074 to mv9000910_96), we found an inhomogeneous structure of the shadow and
assumed that this indicates inhomogeneity in the optical depth of the ejecta plume, i.e.
inhomogeneities in concentration and/or albedo of the dust particles. We assumed that this
indicated inhomogeneity in the excavated material - a layering of the comet nucleus unfolding
with excavation time. To see if these inhomogeneities behave as would be expected for
sequentially excavated layers of the nucleus (i.e. moving up along the ejecta cone with time) we
examined a sequence of MRI images in the time range 0.5 - 2.0 s and took a scan through the
center of the shadow from the impact site and outward to the terminator (Fig. 1, left). Note that
we could not use the images for time smaller than 0.5 s after the impact as at that time the
shadow was very small and covered by the ejecta cloud. To remove the influence of the nucleus
albedo variations, we made the scan through the same area on the pre-impact image of the
nucleus and calculated the ratio of the brightness taken from post-impact image to the pre-impact
image. At each point of the scan, such a ratio is a ratio A*(I-Is) to A*I, where A is albedo of the
given point on the surface, I is the intensity of the solar radiation, and Is is the intensity removed
from the solar radiation due to absorption and scattering by the ejecta particles. It is evident that
considering the ratio we remove effect of the surface albedo.
Figure 2. Left: Scans through the axis of the ejecta shadow for different times after the impact, MRI data
prepared as the ratio of post- to pre-impact images. Right: Nucleus (pre-impact image) scan for MRI (t = -
0.031s); units are W/m2/sr/m. Times are relative to the moment of impact. Note that the brightness
variations in the left and right panels are located at the same positions; the opposite behavior of the
brightness features (minima at the left figure correspond to maxima at the right features) results from
dividing homogeneous post-impact images to inhomogeneous pre-impact images.
Figure 2 shows the scans of the ratio of post-impact to pre-impact image along the axis of the
shadow. One can see several brightness features (pixels 3, 5, and 11) in the scans that may be
caused by more optically thick parts of the ejecta cloud or be filled with darker dust particles.
However, all the features do not move with time, making it doubtful that they are formed by
inhomogeneities in the ejecta material as inhomogeneities, formed by variations of optical depth
5
or particle albedo in the excavated materials, should be seen at larger distances for later time.
Their stable position on the scans suggests that they are not associated with the internal structure
of the expanding ejecta cloud. To investigate the cause of these features, we took scans of the
same area before the impact. In the right panel of Fig.2 we show the pre-impact scans for MRI
images. We can see that the brightness variations in the shadow coincide with the brightness
variations of the nucleus itself. Thus, the shadow inhomogeneity reproduces a nucleus
inhomogeneity. Notice that they are not albedo variations, which, as we mentioned above, should
be canceled as we consider the ratio of post- and pre-impact images. Likely, they are related to
the scattering of light on some structural features of the surface, e.g. crater walls.
From this we conclude that the ejecta cloud itself was rather homogeneous during the 0.5-2.0 s
analysis interval, indicating homogeneity of the layer of the nucleus that was excavated during
that time. We estimate the depth of the layer excavated during the first 2.0 s in Section 3.
2.2 Development of the ejecta up to 68.8 seconds after impact.
The optical depth of the cloud can be also detected through the obscuration of the limb by the
ejecta that can clearly be seen in Figure 1 (right). We used this approach for studying the ejecta
cloud during the period 0.76 - 68.8 s after (there are no reliable data on the ejecta crossing the
limb for times earlier than 0.76 s after impact). Using an image taken just before the impact, at
each point on the downrange limb of the nucleus, we measured the brightness of the nucleus
limb above the background, In. Then on the images after the impact we measured the brightness
at the same locations on the nucleus limb, Il, and immediately beyond the limb, Ib. We assume
that the dust that produces obscuration on the limb is very similar to the dust just outside the limb
at the same location on the limb (the same azimuth) and moment of time, and therefore that the
brightness of the ejecta just beyond the limb may be used to represent the brightness of the dust
on the limb. To be more precise, we carried out a polynomial extrapolation of the out-of-nucleus
brightness to the limb to get second order corrections of the brightness of the ejecta on the limb.
The brightness on the limb after impact is produced by the light scattered by the ejecta dust
particles and the light scattered by the nucleus and attenuated by the ejecta cloud. The latter is
equal to Il – Ib and is also equal to Ine- that allows us to determine , the optical depth of the
ejecta. The obscuration was determined on the limb of the nucleus for a variety of the points
along the nucleus perimeter, i.e. for azimuths from 160° to 290° and for a variety of the times
after impact up to 68.8 seconds thus sequentially covering new strata of the ejecta cloud that
cross the limb. The azimuth was measured along the nucleus perimeter counterclockwise with
the zero azimuth pointing to the top of the image (see Fig. 1 right). Note that as the ejecta plume
expanded, its projection on the nucleus covered a larger part of the nucleus perimeter, thus,
increasing the range of azimuths.
In the case of small optical depth, for an ensemble of particles, the average single-scattering
albedo of the particles, = scaext, can be calculated as the ratio of the intensity of the light
6
scattered by the dust to the intensity of the light lost due to the extinction by the dust particles.
As mentioned above, we assume that the properties of the cloud are the same on the limb and
immediately beyond the limb. This means that the geometrical thickness of the cloud, the
number density of the ejecta grains, and their optical properties defined by their size and
composition are the same in both these almost identical locations. These grains produce the
optical depth τ extracted from the images as described above that by definition is τ = n∙L∙ext,
where n is the number density of the particles, L is the geometrical thickness of the cloud. The
same grains scatter light producing the brightness beyond the limb, Ib, that can be defined as
Isun∙n∙L∙sca(62.9º) where sca(62.9º) is the scattering cross-section at the phase angle 62.9º (the phase
angle of the MRI observations) and Isun is the intensity of the sunlight at the heliocentric distance
of the comet. One can see that from the expressions for optical depth and brightness it is possible
to determine the single-scattering albedo as ω= Ib/(Isun∙τ). Note, that this is not a traditional single-
scattering albedo but the albedo at the phase angle of the observations that was equal to 62.9°.
This means that the obtained values of albedo are smaller than the values we would obtain if we
calculated the traditional single-scattering albedo of the ejecta grains. Where the optical depth is
high, we use a 1D radiative transfer approach similar to the one described in Kokhanovsky
(2004), Chapter 3, to estimate the albedo. We use the Henyey-Greenstein function as the phase
function of the ejecta grains and calculate the optical depth counting on the Sun light
scattered/absorbed by the cloud and the one that was transmitted through the cloud, reflected
from the surface of the nucleus (whose reflectivity we know through the before-impact
brightness of the nucleus, In) and then passed through the cloud again. Calculations are done for
a variety of values for the Henyey-Greenstein parameter g and albedo of the particles. The best
fit parameters for the optically thick parts of the cloud demonstrate low values of albedo that stay
in the range 0.02 - 0.25 and a rather stable value of g that varied only within the range 0.68-0. 70.
Figures 3 shows the results of the analysis described above. The left panel of Figure 3 shows
results for the time period 0.76 -13 s (vertical axis of the plots) and the range of azimuths from
the impact site described above (horizontal axis) and its right panel shows the same data but for
the time range 0.76 - 68.8 s. The brightness of the ejecta on the limb is shown on the top of Fig.
3, the optical depth calculated as described above is shown in the middle, and the single
scattering albedo is shown on the bottom of Fig. 3. Note that, in accordance with the results of
Section 2.1, the optical depth of the ejecta is quite homogeneous for time earlier than two
seconds after impact. However, there are noticeable bands of low optical depth at 8 - 13 s and 60
- 68.8 s. Although the 60 - 68.8 s band looks rather natural as the values of the optical depth
already show some decrease in approaching the band, the 8 - 13 s band begins with a dramatic
drop in the optical depth, suggesting a potential artifact. However, a careful analysis of the data
showed that this is an artifact of the particular display in Figure 3 that corresponds to a large
reduction in the frequency of the MRI sampling that reduced from ~0.11 s to 0.75 s. As a result,
7
Brightness on the limb after impact, Il
Optical depth
Single scattering albedo
Figure 3. Brightness measured on the limb after impact, optical depth, and single-scattering albedo of the
ejecta with the time (vertical axis) from the impact and azimuth (horizontal axis) for the first 13 seconds
(left panel) and 68.8 s (right panel) after the impact. For times earlier than 0.76 s there are no reliable data
on the limb obscuration.
8
the data shown for times after 8 s have a large time gap between them that exaggerates the
abruptness. Our analysis of the data showed that the optical depth had already began decreasing
in many azimuths at time prior to the visible sharp cutoff and the smoothness of this decrease is
disrupted by the big time gap in the data. Notice also that there are no suspicious features in the
brightness for the time after 8 sec, the band in the ejecta cloud is seen only when the optical
depth is calculated. Consequently we conclude that the band of low optical depth at 8-13 seconds
is most likely real. It can be also seen that both bands of low optical depth are associated with a
higher single-scattering albedo, although the albedo inhomogeneity does not produce any band-
like feature and is concentrated within the azimuths 240°-270° for both bands. Both albedo and
optical depth show numerous azimuthal inhomogeneities that are rather randomly distributed
within the ejecta cloud.
3. Discussion: Crater development and depth of the excavated material during the
early stages after impact.
To understand the nature of the features seen in the images shown in Figure 3, we need to
understand from what depth and what location on the surface they originated. This required
modeling the crater formation process, which is presented in this section.
The most important thing we need to define first is whether the crater formed under gravity or
strength domination. This determines the key parameters of crater formation, and specifically the
duration of the formation, the mass of the excavated material and the formulae we use for the
analysis of the ejecta excavation depth.
By analyzing the post-impact crater seen in Stardust-NExT images, Schultz et al. (2013)
conclude that either the crater was entirely gravity dominated or that a nested crater was formed,
with the primary portion (which is the subject of this study), responsible for the crater diameter,
being gravity dominated. Richardson and Melosh (2006) also supported the gravity domination;
they wrote that "The resulting solid ejecta plume, highly visible due to its extremely small
particle distribution, displayed classic gravity-dominated cratering behavior during its ejection
and observed fallback phases: forming an inverted, conical cloud of launched particles which
remained attached to the comet's surface and slowly expanded over the course of the
observations." Although later Richardson and Melosh (2013), analyzing the same Stardust NExT
images, as Schultz et al. conclude that the crater was strength dominated, we find this in
contradiction not only with the other estimates of the crater formation scenario, but also with the
estimates of the total mass of the ejected material. Richardson and Melosh (2013) estimate the
total ejecta mass resulted from a formation of strength dominated crater between 5.4*105 kg and
2.6*106 kg. However, this is lower than the mass of the Deep Impact ejecta. Keller et al. (2007),
using observations by OSIRIS instrument onboard the Rosetta spacecraft, estimated that only
water molecules, without other ejecta components, constituted (4.5-9)×106 kg and the total mass
of the ejecta should be between 107 kg and 108 kg. Similar numbers were obtained from ground-
9
based observations by Schleicher et al. (2006) and Biver et al. (2007). Our estimate
(Nagdimunov et al. 2014), possible only for a gravity controlled crater, was 3*107 kg. Notice
also that a strength dominated crater should be formed quite quickly, within several seconds,
whereas a gravity dominated crater would require hundreds of second for its formation
(Richardson et al. 2007) and the last fact is more consistent with the formation of the Deep
Impact crater, specifically, in the MRI images (McLaughlin et al. 2014b) we see no evidence of
detachment of the ejecta from the nucleus surface even 12 minutes after impact, which is more
consistent with continuous excavation of the nucleus material for a period longer than a couple
of seconds after impact.
Recently, gravity domination at the comet crater formation received additional support from the
studies of the properties of comet 67P Churyumov-Gerasimenko. Groussin et al. (2015) found a
low value of the strength (<15 Pa). This value is typical for meter-sized scale on the surface,
which is the scale of our interest for Deep Impact crater, although on a small scale, of centimeter
size, the strength can be larger, reaching ~10 kPa (Groussin et al. 2015; see also Vincent et al.
2015).
The basic equations we used are from the papers by O'Keefe and Ahrens (1993) and Holsapple
and Schmidt (1987), and the parameters of the impact are from Holsapple and Housen (2007).
O'Keefe and Ahrens consider three main regimes of the crater growth (Holsapple and Schmidt
refer to the same 3 regimes as "very early time", "intermediate time" and "late time"):
(1) Penetration regime. It is characterized by the transfer of the projectile kinetic energy to the
surface of the impacted object. The condition of penetration regime is U*t/a<5.1, where U is the
normal component of the impact velocity, a is equivalent spherical radius of impactor and t is
time.
(2) Inertial regime. It is characterized by the expansion of the crater cavity with a constant
geometry of the cavity (hemispherical). The end of inertial regime for crater depth is
characterized by the time of maximum penetration, tmp. The end of the inertial regime for crater
width, which is also the time of termination of crater formation, is characterized by tmw. For a
gravity dominated crater, these can be estimated from the following formulas:
U*tmp/a = 0.92 (g*a/U2)-(1+μ)/(2+μ) (1)
U*tmw/a = 1.8 (g*a/U2)- (1+μ)/(2+μ) (2)
where g is surface gravity, and μ is the coupling exponent (for details, see Holsapple and
Schmidt, 1987).
(3) Terminal regime. It begins when the growth of the crater is stopped by strength and/or
gravitational forces. At this time the crater lip has stopped expanding laterally and collapses into
an outward propagating wave.
The formulae above were derived for gravity dominated crater formation and will be used in the
following analysis. First, we estimate in which regime the crater formation was during the period
of our observations.
10
Taking values of U= 5.1 km/sec and a=0.46 m from Holsapple and Housen (2007), we obtain
that even for the earliest time of our observations, 0.5 sec, we are out of the penetration regime
because U*t/a >> 5.1. For the following estimates, we consider gravity dominated cases on
opposite extremes presented by Holsapple and Housen: one is called "sand" and represents some
porous material, and the other is called "water", it represents a non-porous material. The
difference between these materials is primarily caused by different values of the coupling
exponent: μ=0.41 for "sand", and μ=0.55 for "water". We use the results by Holsapple and
Housen as they present the most recent attempts to study gravity-dominated cometary crater
excavation and specifically target Deep Impact cratering, although their consideration is limited
by the available experimental data on cratering, and may not fully reproduce the characteristics
of cometary material. Using these values, we obtain a time of the maximum penetration, tmp,
from Eq. (1), equal to 258 s for the "sand" case and 451 s for the "water" case; thus, for both
cases our time period is within the inertial regime. The time of termination of crater formation
tmw, obtained from Eq. (2), is 504 and 902 seconds, or approximately double tmp, thus, it is even
later in the crater formation period. These results show that assuming a gravity dominated
excavation, the time period of the observations we use in our analysis is within the inertial
period, i.e. within the period of transient crater growth (i.e. before the end of excavation and
before the crater undergoes collapse or rebounding). In this case, we can use the formulas from
Table 1 in Holsapple and Housen (2007) to estimate the crater depth and size as it was
developing during the early stages of the crater formation. The growth of the crater diameter, D,
is described by the formula:
D/a = K(δ/ρ)0.4/(1+μ) (Ut/a)μ/(1+μ) (3)
where K =2.1 for the "sand" case, and K = 2.6 for the "water" case. We use Eq. (3) to determine
the size of the crater for specific times of observations and produce a range of values using, as
before, two extreme cases: porous and non-porous materials. Note that Holsapple and Housen
found that the final crater diameter should be about 88 m for porous material ("sand") and of the
order of 350 m for non-porous material ("water"); thus, we may assume that the real crater with
the diameter ~200 m (Schultz et al. 2013) was produced by a material whose mechanical
characteristics are between these two cases. However, the difference between these two materials
is unlikely to be confined solely to differing macroscopic porosity, microscopic (individual
particle) porosity and other mechanical factors would also influence material behavior. To avoid
the confusion that the only difference between the extreme cases is their porosity, we will refer
to them primarily as "sand" and "water," using these words as nicknames, which identify the
extreme cases of mechanical properties represented in Eq. (3) by different values of parameters
K and . We use the formula D/d=1.67 from O'Keefe and Ahrens (1993) to estimate the depth of
excavation, d, for each size of the transient crater to see from which depth the material was
excavated at specific times of observations.
11
Although the data in Fig. 3 cover a time period up to 68.8 seconds after impact, the ejecta that
crossed the limb at the observation time tobs were excavated at some earlier time which we call
excavation time texc; this accounts for the travel time of the ejecta from the crater to the limb.
The difference between the time when the material was excavated and the time when we observe
this material crossing the limb can be estimated as,
tobs – texc = (tobs_i - texc_i)* vi / v
where v is the velocity of the material excavated at the time of excavation texc, and vi is the
velocity of the material, that crosses the limb first, i.e. its observation time is the time when we
see the earliest part of the main ejecta crossing the limb (in the formula above there are projected
velocities, but the projection factors cancel when we take the ratio, so we can use the unprojected
velocities here; later we calculate them based on the crater-scaling law). We denote this earliest
observation time as tobs_i, it can be taken from Fig. 3 to be 0.76 s. The corresponding excavation
time, i.e., the excavation time of the material that reached the limb with the velocity vi, is
denoted as texc_i, The value of v is dependent on the excavation time, following the formula (see
Hermalyn and Schultz, 2011; Richardson et al., 2007),
v/vi = (texc/texc_i)- 1/(1+μ)
where μ is the coupling exponent. Combining the two formulas above we obtain that the time
after impact when we observe the material on the limb (this is the time indicated in Fig. 3) is,
tobs = texc+ (tobs_i - texc_i)*(texc/texc_i)-1/(1+μ)
(4)
This formula can be used to estimate the excavation time for different observation times shown
in Fig. 3. This excavation time can then be used in Eq. (3) to estimate the depth and diameter of
the crater at different moments after impact.
However, before we can use Eq. (4), we need to know the time of excavation of the earliest
ejecta, texc_i. We estimated this time with two methods using MRI images taken during the first
second after impact. First, we found the image which showed the moment when the main ejecta
plume just started developing (image m9000910_066, see McLaughlin et al. 2014b). Via this
image we estimated the time when the excavation started, assuming it equal to the middle of the
exposure time. This yielded texc_i ≃ 0.15 s. We also estimated texc_i based on the discussion in
A'Hearn et al (2005a), where a set of early MRI images was presented, including the image
m9000910_069, which shows the moment when material from the hot flash first reached the
limb. A'Hearn et al. (2005a) estimated the projected velocity of this hot material to be 5 km/s.
The pixel spatial resolution (86.843 m/pixel) and number of pixels between the impact point and
the limb (equal to 12) allow us to find out the projected distance from the crater to the limb, from
which we can estimate the time when the hot material was ejected that is the time when the main
ejecta excavation started. It was found to be texc_i ≃ 0.14 s. The two estimates of texc_i are not
completely identical, however, they are very close and provide extremely similar results. Since
the second approach is based on several uncertain data (exact moment when the hot material
12
reached the limb and speed of the material) whereas the uncertainty in the first approach is only
related to the exact time of the first appearance of the ejected material in the image during the
exposure period, in our following consideration we will focus on texc_i ≃ 0.15 s.
Based on Eq. (3), the correspondence of excavation time to observation time calculated from Fig.
3 using Eq. (4), and the initial excavation time texc_i ≃ 0.15 s , we have produced Figure 4 which
shows the excavation depth and transient crater diameter for different moments after impact,
considering the two cases described above: porous ("sand") and non-porous ("water") materials.
The results for specific bands and azimuthal features are presented in Table 1, where we have
also compared the computations for texc_i ≃ 0.15 s and texc_i ≃ 0.14 s to be sure that the
uncertainty in the beginning of excavation does not affect the main conclusions of the paper.
Figure 4. Calculated excavation depth (left vertical axis) and diameter (right vertical axis) of the transient
Deep Impact crater as a function of observation time (lower axis) and excavation time (upper axis). The
results are for a gravity dominated crater; left panel shows porous ("sand") material and the right panel
shows non-porous ("water") material. The gray areas show the areas of 2-3 s, 8-13 s and 60- 68.8 s bands
in optical depth seen in Fig. 3.
Table 1. Time of excavation and depth of the excavation for porous and non-porous
materials for the bands and azimuthal features in Fig. 3.
texc_i ≃ 0.15 s
Porous material
texc, S
depth, m
Non-porous material
texc, s
depth, m
tobs, s
13
2 - 3
0.5 – 0.9
9 – 11
0.6 – 1
20 – 23
Band of high optical depth
8 - 13
60 - 68.88
3 – 5.5
33 – 38
15 – 18
30 – 32
3.5 – 6
38.5 – 45
Bands of low optical depth
8.5 - 20
15 - 40
Azimuthal feature (high albedo) at 240° - 270°
3.7 – 10
3.2 – 9
Azimuthal feature (high optical depth) at 160° - 210°
6.4 – 20
15 – 20
18 – 26
7.5 – 24
37 – 46
87 – 93
38 – 55
49 – 74
A combination of Figures 3 and 4 reveal some details about the structure of the nucleus of comet
9P/Tempel 1. Noting that the real case is likely closer to the porous ("sand") case than the non-
porous ("water") case, hereafter we will cite values for the "sand" case with numbers for the
"water" case in parentheses. First, as we mentioned in Section 2.2, there are "horizontal" (along
the same time mark) inhomogeneities in the images. Particularly, there are the bands of low
optical depth at 8-13 s and 60- 68.8 s of observation time. They can be interpreted as layers
located on the depth 15 - 18 m (37 - 46 m) and 30 – 32 m (87 - 93 m)1. Low optical depth in
these layers is accompanied by a higher albedo of the material, especially evident in the layer
between the observation time 8 and 13 s. However, albedo appears to be more inhomogeneous
than optical depth; its features are usually concentrated in a narrow range of azimuths,
specifically, for the 8-13 s layer albedo is high within an azimuth of 240° - 270°. There also is a
noticeable band of high optical depth located just after 2.0 seconds, i.e. slightly deeper than 9
(20) meters. This band is accompanied by an azimuthal albedo feature located at azimuths 240° -
270°. These three bands, at 2.0, 8.0, and 60 seconds are the only ones that can potentially be
associated with nucleus layering. As mentioned above, the nucleus can have a finer layering
structure; however, we cannot resolve it due to averaging resulting from the limited temporal and
spatial resolution in the MRI data. All other features relate to azimuthal inhomogeneity. The
most noticeable among them is the area of increased optical depth at 15-40 s after impact, having
azimuths of 160° - 210° and a depth of about 18 – 26 (49 - 74) meters, and the already mentioned
area of high albedo at 240° - 270° that extends from 15 (38) m to 20 ( 55) m. There are also
narrow vertical features in the brightness which can be also seen in the optical depth and,
although less evidently, in albedo. We believe these are the rays clearly seen in the images of the
ejecta cloud (Fig. 1 right). These vertical features are more pronounced in the optical depth than
in albedo, indicating that the rays have a characteristically higher dust density. There are also
1 We may even notice that after the 8-13 s layer the optical depth of the nucleus became generally
lower (except of a chunk of high optical depth material located at azimuths 160°-210°), probably
indicating increasing porosity of the nucleus. This is consistent with decrease of the dielectric
constant of the nucleus materials with depth found for comet 67P/ Churyumov-Gerasimenko by
CONSERT instrument on Rosetta mission (Ciarletti et al. 2015).
14
very narrow optical depth (at ~ 7 s and azimuth ~210°) and high albedo (at ~ 60 s and azimuth
~240°) features.
The resolution of crater depth and diameter based on limb crossing observations can be
determined by examining individual MRI observation times, combined with our calculations
summarized by Fig. 4. We obtain a crater depth resolution of as 0.2 m (for "sand") and 0.5 m
(for "water") at the time the ejecta initially reached the limb, tobs = 0.76 s. In either of these
cases, the data do not have sufficient resolution to see the thin layer of organic material reported
by Kadono et al. (2007). At slightly later observation times of 7-8 s, due to the slower change in
the velocities (see Fig. 4) and prior to the MRI switching to a mode with worse temporal
resolution, we could obtain finer depth resolution which may be as low as 0.05 m . Note that
these estimates are affected by the uncertainties in the excavation start time and rough
representation of the material properties.
As we have shown in Section 2.1, after we take into account the nucleus surface inhomogeneity,
the brightness of the shadow that the ejecta cloud casts on the nucleus does not show any
variations which can be clearly associated with the inhomogeneity of the ejecta cloud.
Unfortunately, analysis of the shadow ejecta is much more complicated than the analysis of the
limb-crossing ejecta. The observations of the limb-crossing ejecta show mainly the dust that
forms the leading edge of the ejecta cone, i.e. the ejecta which move in the direction opposite to
the impactor trajectory (see Fig. 3 in Schultz et al. 2007) whereas the shadow is formed by the
light that goes through the whole ejecta plume. Specifically, the shadow is partly formed by the
light that passes through the ejecta in the central part of the cone, which are likely extracted from
different layers than the outer parts of the ejecta cone (Schultz et al. 2007). Besides, the outer
parts of the ejecta cone are affected by azimuthal difference in the ejecta speed that is typical for
oblique impacts (see Anderson et al. 2003 and Richardson 2011). The latter results in azimuthal
variations of the calculated ejecta excavation time, and, thus, in azimuthal variations of their
calculated excavation depth. Since in the shadow, we observe material from different depths
simultaneously, determining the excavation time of the ejecta which cast each part of the shadow
is very problematic. We suppose that during the shadow observation (0.96 – 2 s after impact) we
see the material excavated from the depth from 9 m to 15 m for "sand" (or to 30 m for "water"),
but cannot disentangle depth or excavation time for individual pixels.
4. Conclusions
In the paper we presented two approaches which allow one to characterize the materials
excavated during an impact crater formation at different moments after impact. Both approaches
were tested using the images of the ejecta resulted from the Deep Impact experiment on comet
9P Tempel 1.
The most interesting result of our analysis is that observed inhomogeneities (bands and
azimuthal features in albedo or optical depth) in the ejecta imply inhomogeneities both laterally
15
and with depth in the tens of meters near the surface of the nucleus. We then use crater-scaling-
laws to estimate from which depth the material that produces said albedo or optical depth
inhomogeneities was excavated, and use this as a probe of the internal inhomogeneity of the
comet nucleus. Summarized characteristics of these bands and azimuthal features are presented
in Table 1. It is hard to define the physical reasons that are responsible for the described bands
and azimuthal features. Whereas high albedo may be associated with a higher abundance of ice
and low albedo with a low ice abundance or domination of absorbing (perhaps carbonaceous)
materials, the inhomogeneities in the optical depth are harder to explain unambiguously. Our
radiative transfer modeling reported in Nagdimunov et al. (2014) showed that, due to the fact
that the optical depth is a function of the extinction cross-section multiplied by the number
density, we can find a variety of combinations of extinction cross-section and number density
that produce the same fit for the optical depth. The bands of low optical depth or azimuthal
inhomogeneities in optical depth can be areas of lower bulk density of the material (due to higher
porosity) or areas characterized by dust consisting of particles of smaller extinction cross-
section. If there is no albedo feature correlated with the optical depth feature, then, more likely,
the reason of the optical depth feature is a varying porosity (number density), although variations
in the particle size are also possible. If there is a correlation between the optical depth and albedo
variations, then, more likely, a difference in the dust particle extinction is the reason of the
variations, indicating either a difference in material absorption, or in particle size variations, or
both.
Acknowledgement
The work was supported by the NASA PMDAP program, grant NNX10AP31G. We appreciate
comments by the anonymous reviewer which led to a significant improvement of the paper.
References
A'Hearn, M, M. Belton, W. A. Delamere, J. Kissel, K. P. Klaasen, L. A. McFadden, et al.,
2005a, Deep Impact: Excavating Comet Tempel 1," Science 310, 258-264.
A'Hearn, M., M. Belton, A. Delamere, W. H. Blume, 2005b, Deep Impact: A large-scale active
experiment on a cometary nucleus, Space Sci. Rev. 117, 1-21.
Anderson, J. L., Schultz, P. H., and Heineck, J. T., 2003, Asymmetry of ejecta flow during
oblique impacts using three‐dimensional particle image velocimetry. Journal of
Geophysical Research: Planets, 108(E8), 13-1 – 13-10.
Belton, M. J., Thomas, P., Veverka, J., Schultz, P., A'Hearn, M. F., Feaga, L., ... and Kissel, J.,
2007, The internal structure of Jupiter family cometary nuclei from Deep Impact
observations: The "talps" or "layered pile" model. Icarus, 187(1), 332-344.
Biver, N. D., Bockelée-Morvan, D., Boissier, J., Crovisier, J., Colom, P., Lecacheux, A.,
Moreno, R., Paubert, G., Lis, D. C., Sumner, M. et al., 2007, Radio observations of comet
9P/Tempel 1 before and after deep impact. Icarus, 187, 253–271.
Ciarletti, V. A.C. Levasseur-Regourd, J. Lasue, C. Statz, D. Plettemeier, A. Hérique, Y. Rogez
and W. Kofman, 2015, CONSERT suggests a change in local properties of
67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko's nucleus at depth, Aastron.Astrophys., DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526337.
16
Hampton, D. L., Baer, J. W., Huisjen, M. A., Varner, C. C., Delamere, A., Wellnitz, D. D., ...
and Klaasen, K. P., 2005, An overview of the instrument suite for the Deep Impact
mission. Space Science Reviews, 117(1-2), 43-93.
Hermalyn, B., and Schultz, P. H. 2011. Time-resolved studies of hypervelocity vertical impacts
into porous particulate targets: Effects of projectile density on early-time coupling and
crater growth. Icarus, 216(1), 269-279.
Holsapple, K. A., and Schmidt, R. M., 1987. Point source solutions and coupling parameters in
cratering mechanics. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (1978–2012), 92(B7),
6350-6376.
Holsapple, K.A., Housen, K.R., 2007. A crater and its ejecta: An interpretation of Deep Impact.
Icarus 187, 345–356.
Groussin, O., L. Jorda, A.-T. Auger, E. Kührt, R. Gaskell, C. Capanna, F. Scholten, F. Preusker,
P. Lamy, S. Hviid, J. Knollenberg, U. Keller, C. Huettig, H. Sierks, C. Barbieri, R.
Rodrigo, D. Koschny, H. Rickman, M. F. A'Hearn, J. Agarwal, M. A. Barucci, J.-L.
Bertaux, I. Bertini, S. Boudreault, G. Cremonese, V. Da Deppo, B. Davidsson, S. Debei,
M. De Cecco19, M. R. El-Maarry, S. Fornasier, M. Fulle, P. J. Gutiérrez, C. Güttler, W.-
H Ip, J.-R. Kramm, M. Küppers, M. Lazzarin, L. M. Lara, J. J. Lopez Moreno, S. Marchi,
F. Marzari, M. Massironi, H. Michalik, G. Naletto, N. Oklay, A. Pommerol, M. Pajola,
N. Thomas, I. Toth, C. Tubiana, and J.-B. Vincent, 2015, Gravitational slopes,
geomorphology, and material strengths of the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-
Gerasimenko from OSIRIS observations Astron. and Astrophys. manuscript no.
26379_ap cESO 2015 July 21, 2015
Kadono, T., Sugita, S., Sako, S., Ootsubo, T., Honda, M., Kawakita, H., Miyata, T., Furusho, R.,
and Watanabe, J., 2007. The thickness and formation age of the surface layer on comet
9P/Tempel 1. Ap.J.Let. 661(1), L89 – L92.
Keller, H.U., Küppers, M., Fornasier, S., Gutierrez, P.J., Hviid, S.F., Jorda, L., Knollenberg, J.,
Lowry, S.C., Rengel, M., Bertini, I., Cremonese, G., Ip, W.-H., Koschny, D., Kramm, R.,
Kührt, E., Lara, L.-M., Sierks, H., Thomas, N., Barbieri, C., Lamy, Ph., Rickman, H.,
Rodrigo, R., A´Hearn, M.F., Angrilli, F., Barucci, M.-A.,. Bertaux, J.-L, da Deppo, V.,
Davidsson, B. J. R., de Cecco, M., Debei, S., Fulle, M., Gliem, F., Groussin, O., Lopez
Moreno, J.J., Marzari, F., Naletto, G., Sabau, L., Andrés, S. A., Wenzel, K.-P., 2007.
Observations of Comet 9P/Tempel 1 around the Deep Impact event by the OSIRIS
cameras onboard Rosetta. Icarus 191, 241-257.
Kokhanovsky, A., 2004, Light scattering media optics: problems and solutions, Springer, Berlin,
240 p.
McLaughlin, S. A., B. Carcich, T. McCarthy, M. Desnoyer, and K.P. Klaasen, 2014a, DEEP
IMPACT 9P/TEMPEL ENCOUNTER - REDUCED HRIV IMAGES V3.0, DIF-C-
HRIV-3/4-9P-ENCOUNTER-V3.0, NASA Planetary Data System.
McLaughlin, S.A., B. Carcich, S.E. Sackett, T. McCarthy, M. Desnoyer, K.P. Klaasen, and D.W.
Wellnitz, 2014b. DEEP IMPACT 9P/TEMPEL ENCOUNTER - REDUCED MRI
IMAGES V3.0, DIF-C-MRI-3/4-9P-ENCOUNTER-V3.0, NASA Planetary Data System
Meech, K. J., Ageorges, N., A'Hearn, M. F., Arpigny, C., Ates, A., Aycock, J.... and Filipovic,
M. D., 2005, Deep Impact: Observations from a worldwide Earth-based campaign,
Science, 310(5746), 265-269.
Nagdimunov, L., Kolokolova, L., Wolff, M., A'Hearn, M. F., and Farnham, T. L., 2014,
Properties of comet 9P/Tempel 1 dust immediately following excavation by Deep Impact.
Planetary and Space Science, 100, 73-78.
O'Keefe, J. D., and Ahrens, T. J. 1993. Planetary cratering mechanics. Journal of Geophysical
Research: Planets (1991–2012), 98(E9), 17011-17028.
17
Richardson, J. E., 2011, Modeling impact ejecta plume evolution: A comparison to laboratory
studies. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 116(E12), CiteID E12004.
Richardson, J. E.; Melosh, H. J.(2006) Modeling the Ballistic Behavior of Solid Ejecta from the
Deep Impact Cratering Event, 37th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference,
March 13-17, 2006, League City, Texas, abstract no.1836.
Richardson, J.E., Melosh, H.J., Lisse, C.M., Carcich, B, 2007, A ballistics analysis of the Deep
Impact ejecta plume: Determining Comet Tempel 1's gravity, mass, and density. Icarus
191, 176-209.
Richardson, J. E., and Melosh, H. J., 2013. An examination of the Deep Impact collision site on
Comet Tempel 1 via Stardust-NExT: Placing further constraints on cometary surface
properties. Icarus, 222(2), 492-501.
Robitaille, T.P., 2011, HYPERION: an open-source parallelized three-dimensional dust
continuum radiative transfer code. Astron. Astrophys. 536, A79.
Schleicher, D. G., K. L. Barnes, N. F. Baugh, 2006. Photometry and imaging results for comet
9P/Tempel 1 and Deep Impact: Gas production rates, postimpact light curves, and ejecta
plume morphology. Astron. J. 131, 1130–1137.
Schultz, P.H., Eberhardy, C.A., Ernst, C.M., A'Hearn, M.F., Sunshine, J.M., Lisse, C.M., 2007,
The Deep Impact oblique impact cratering experiment. Icarus, 191, 84-122.
Schultz, P. H., Hermalyn, B., and Veverka, J., 2013. The Deep Impact crater on 9P/Tempel-1
from Stardust-NExT. Icarus, 222(2), 502-515.
Vincent, J. B., Oklay, N., Marchi, S., Höfner, S., and Sierks, H., 2015, Craters on comets.
Planetary and Space Science, 107, 53-63.
18
|
1804.11006 | 1 | 1804 | 2018-04-30T00:05:17 | The detectability of radio emission from exoplanets | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | Like the magnetised planets in our Solar System, magnetised exoplanets should emit strongly at radio wavelengths. Radio emission directly traces the planetary magnetic fields and radio detections can place constraints on the physical parameters of these features. Large comparative studies of predicted radio emission characteristics for the known population of exoplanets help to identify what physical parameters could be key for producing bright, observable radio emission. Since the last comparative study, many thousands of exoplanets have been discovered. We report new estimates for the radio flux densities and maximum emission frequencies for the current population of known exoplanets orbiting pre-main sequence and main-sequence stars with spectral types F-M. The set of exoplanets predicted to produce observable radio emission are Hot Jupiters orbiting young stars. The youth of these system predicts strong stellar magnetic fields and/or dense winds, which are key for producing bright, observable radio emission. We use a new all-sky circular polarisation Murchison Widefield Array survey to place sensitive limits on 200 MHz emission from exoplanets, with $3\sigma$ values ranging from 4.0 - 45.0 mJy. Using a targeted Giant Metre Wave Radio Telescope observing campaign, we also report a $3\sigma$ upper limit of 4.5 mJy on the radio emission from V830 Tau b, the first Hot Jupiter to be discovered orbiting a pre-main sequence star. Our limit is the first to be reported for the low-frequency radio emission from this source. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph |
MNRAS 000, 1–14 (2018)
Preprint 1 May 2018
Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0
The detectability of radio emission from exoplanets
C. R. Lynch,1,2(cid:63) Tara Murphy1,2 E. Lenc,1,2 D. L. Kaplan3
1 Sydney Institute for Astronomy, School of Physics, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
2 ARC Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO)
3 Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA
Accepted 2018 April 27. Received 2018 April 25; in original form 2018 March 13
ABSTRACT
Like the magnetised planets in our Solar System, magnetised exoplanets should emit
strongly at radio wavelengths. Radio emission directly traces the planetary magnetic
fields and radio detections can place constraints on the physical parameters of these
features. Large comparative studies of predicted radio emission characteristics for the
known population of exoplanets help to identify what physical parameters could be
key for producing bright, observable radio emission. Since the last comparative study,
many thousands of exoplanets have been discovered. We report new estimates for the
radio flux densities and maximum emission frequencies for the current population of
known exoplanets orbiting pre-main sequence and main-sequence stars with spectral
types F-M. The set of exoplanets predicted to produce observable radio emission are
Hot Jupiters orbiting young stars. The youth of these system predicts strong stellar
magnetic fields and/or dense winds, which are key for producing bright, observable
radio emission. We use a new all-sky circular polarisation Murchison Widefield Array
survey to place sensitive limits on 200 MHz emission from exoplanets, with 3σ values
ranging from 4.0 – 45.0 mJy. Using a targeted Giant Metre Wave Radio Telescope ob-
serving campaign, we also report a 3σ upper limit of 4.5 mJy on the radio emission
from V830 Tau b, the first Hot Jupiter to be discovered orbiting a pre-main sequence
star. Our limit is the first to be reported for the low-frequency radio emission from
this source.
Key words:
thermal – plasmas
radio continuum: planetary systems – radiation mechanisms: non–
1 INTRODUCTION
Over the past few decades there has been a great effort
to discover planets outside our Solar System, with more
than 3700 systems now identified (Schneider et al. 2011).
The large contrast in optical or infrared brightness be-
tween the exoplanets and their host stars make discoveries
through direct imaging difficult. Thus the majority of the
currently known exoplanet population were discovered indi-
rectly, through searches for the influence of the exoplanet
on its host star (Perryman 2011). An alternative method
of direct detection of magnetised exoplanets is through ra-
dio observations, as the expected radio emission produced
by these planets could exceed the emission of the host star
(Griessmeier et al. 2005). Radio observations would also pro-
vide a direct measurement of the planet's surface magnetic
field strength and in turn provide insight into the interior
composition of these planets. Further, Hess & Zarka (2011)
(cid:63) E-mail: [email protected]
© 2018 The Authors
show that the variability of the radio emission in both time
and frequency can provide constraints on the rotational pe-
riod of the planet, the orbital period and inclination, and
the magnetic field tilt relative to the rotation axis.
The magnetised planets in our own Solar System are
observed to emit intense, low-frequency radio emission from
their auroral regions through the electron–cyclotron maser
instability (CMI). The observed emission is highly circularly
or elliptically polarised, beamed, and variable on time–scales
ranging from seconds to days (Wu & Lee 1979; Treumann
2006). This emission arises from the propagation of ener-
getic (keV) electrons along converging magnetic field lines
in the planet's magnetosphere. Similarly, magnetised exo-
planets are expected to emit intense, low-frequency radio
emission (e.g. Winglee et al. 1986; Zarka et al. 2001).
The best targets for radio observation can be selected
through theoretical estimates of the main characteristics of
their planetary radio emission. The empirical relation called
the Radiometric Bode(cid:48)s law (RBL), based on observations
of the magnetised Solar System planets, is primarily used to
2
C. R. Lynch et al.
predict the intensity of radio emission from exoplanet. This
relation relates the incident energy flux of the stellar wind
to the radio power produced by a planet (Desch & Kaiser
1984; Zarka et al. 2001). However, the connection between
the stellar wind and planetary auroral radio emission may
not be as direct in large, co-rotating magnetospheres as it is
for Jupiter. Jovian aurorae are driven by currents that form
in the middle magnetosphere (Nichols 2011), although there
is some evidence that the Solar wind may have an indirect
effect on the produced Jovian emission (Gurnett et al. 2002).
There have been a number of theoretical studies that
estimate the expected radio flux densities from exoplanet
systems using the RBL. Focusing on five massive planets or-
biting Solar-like stars, Farrell et al. (1999) noted τ Bootes to
be an optimal target. Lazio et al. (2004) modelled the radio
flux density for 118 sources (known exoplanet population as
of 2003 July 01), finding planets with small orbital distances
to produce mJy level emission at frequencies between 10 −−
1000 MHz. Work by Stevens (2005) and Griessmeier et al.
(2005) focused on investigating how variations in the stel-
lar wind and mass-loss rate affect the expected radio flux
density. In the case of kinetic energy driven RBL, they find
that objects with higher mass–loss rates and wind veloci-
ties relative to the Sun are more favourable targets for radio
detections. This result suggests that Hot Jupiters located
in more exotic planetary environments, such as around pre-
main sequence stars (Vidotto et al. 2010; Vidotto & Donati
2017) or stars that have evolved off the main-sequence (Fujii
et al. 2016) may be ideal candidates for radio detections.
Griessmeier et al. (2007a) compared the predicted ra-
dio flux densities for 197 exoplanets (known population of
exoplanets as of 2007 January 13) using models where the
level of planetary radio emission is related to the incident
magnetic flux, incident kinetic energy of the stellar wind, or
the incident energy from coronal mass ejections. They found
that these different models lead to very different results,
with the magnetic energy model predicting the largest flux
densities. They note, however, that all energy input models
should be considered since it is not clear which dominates in
planet–star systems. Griessmeier et al. (2011) extended this
analysis by predicting the flux densities for an updated cat-
alogue of 547 objects (known population of exoplanets as of
2011 April 28).
Nichols (2011, 2012) suggest that radio emission from
some exoplanets may be dominated by a magnetosphere–
ionosphere coupling current system associated with an in-
ternal plasma source such as an active moon. The expected
radio emission from these planets would then not follow the
RBL. They find that in such systems, fast rotating mas-
sive planets orbiting in large orbits around stars, with bright
emission at X-ray to far-UV wavelengths, are capable of gen-
erating detectable radio emission. Further arguments against
the RBL suggest that for close-in planets magnetospheric
convection will saturate. These systems will not be able to
dissipate the total incident stellar wind energy and thus the
RBL will over estimate the flux densities substantially in
these cases (Jardine & Collier Cameron 2008; Nichols & Mi-
lan 2016).
In addition to these theoretical studies, there have been
many observational attempts to detect radio emission from
exoplanets. The first searches for radio emission from exo-
planets occurred before the first detection of the currently
known population of exoplanets (Winglee et al. 1986). Many
of the more recent searches have involved targeting nearby
Hot Jupiters previously detected through radial velocity and
transit observations (Bastian et al. 2000; George & Stevens
2007; Smith et al. 2009; Lazio et al. 2010; Stroe et al. 2012;
Lecavelier des Etangs et al. 2013; Hallinan et al. 2013; Lynch
et al. 2017; O'Gorman et al. 2018). Others have used obser-
vations from low-frequency sky surveys to search for emis-
sion at the location of known exoplanets (Lazio et al. 2004;
Sirothia et al. 2014; Murphy et al. 2015). Despite these ef-
forts there have been no unambiguous detections to date.
In this paper we update previous attempts to predict
the radio emission from exoplanets by applying the RBL to
the current population of known exoplanets. For systems
with predicted emission properties that make them ideal
candidates for detection, we place limits on their radio emis-
sion at 200 MHz using a recent Murchison Widefield Array
(MWA; Tingay et al. 2013) all-sky circular polarisation sur-
vey (Lenc et al. tted). We also report the results of a deep
Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (GMRT) observing cam-
paign of a particularly interesting target, V830 Tau b, the
first confirmed Hot Jupiter orbiting a pre-main sequence star
(Donati et al. 2016).
2 RADIO EMISSION FROM EXOPLANETS
As described by Zarka (2007), there are in principle four
different types of interaction between a planetary obstacle
and an ambient stellar wind. These depend on whether the
stellar wind and planet are magnetised or un-magnetised. In
three of the four cases it is possible to produce intense non-
thermal radio emission; the only case where radio emission
is not produced is when an un-magnetised ambient wind
encounters a un-magnetised planet.
For cases where the star–planet interaction is expected
to produce radio emission, the RBL suggests that the ex-
pected radio power, Pradio, is roughly proportional to the
input power, Pinput, from the ambient stellar wind
Pradio ∝ Pinput
In the same manner as Griessmeier et al. (2005, 2007a,b), we
determine the proportionality constant by scaling the Jo-
vian auroral radio emission, Pradio,J, with the input energy
from the stellar wind. Observations of Jovian auroral emis-
sion show that the observed radio power varies greatly over
time, with emission reaching powers as high as 4.5×1018 erg
s−1. We use the average power during periods of high activity
as a reference value, with Pradio,J = 2.1×1018 erg s−1. While
(1)
scaling RBL using Jupiter's emission is standard practice,
note that the majority of Jovian emission is not driven by
an interaction with the Solar wind but by the planet's rota-
tion (Nichols 2011). This limitation should be kept in mind
throughout the rest of this work.
The star–planet interaction can be decomposed into ei-
ther the dissipation of the kinetic power, Pinput,kin, of the
stellar wind protons impacting the planet's magnetosphere
Pinput,kin = mpnv3
or the interplanetary Poynting flux on the planet's magne-
tosphere
Pinput,mag = (B2⊥/8π) veff πR2
m.
eff πR2
m
(2)
(3)
MNRAS 000, 1–14 (2018)
Here mp is the mass of a proton, n the number density of the
ambient stellar wind at the location of the planet, veff the
effective velocity of the stellar wind in the reference frame of
the planet, Rm is the radius of the planetary magnetosphere,
and B⊥ is the interplanetary magnetic field perpendicular to
the stellar wind flow. The radio flux density, Sν, expected
from a magnetised exoplanet at a distance d is then
Sν =
Pradio
Ωd2∆ν
(4)
where Ω is the solid angle of the beam of emitted radia-
tion, which we assume to be equivalent to that of Jovian
radio emission Ω=1.6 sr (Zarka et al. 2004) and ∆ν is the
bandwidth of the emission and is taken to be the maximum
emission frequency. Depending on the type of star–planet in-
teraction, the radio power will be given by scaling equation
(2) or (3) by Pradio,J.
Planetary CMI emission is produced near the local cy-
clotron frequency within the source region of the magneto-
sphere. The CMI radio spectrum is expected to show a sharp
cutoff at the cyclotron frequency associated with the max-
imum magnetic field strength, Bmax
, close to the planet's
surface. The maximum emission frequency, νmax
, is then
p
c
νmax
c
=
p
eBmax
2πme
≈ 2.8 MHz Bmax
p
.
(5)
Here, me and e are the electron mass and charge, and Bmax
is measured in Gauss.
p
For an observer to detect the radio emission from an
exoplanet, in addition to being bright enough, the emission
must also be able to propagate from the source to the ob-
server. The characteristic plasma frequency, νp, of a plasma
with number density n (in cm−3),
νp =
≈ 8.98 KHz
√
n
ne2
πme
(6)
(cid:115)
provides a lower frequency limit for the propagation of elec-
tromagnetic radiation. Emission at frequencies lower than
the local plasma frequency will be absorbed by the plasma.
In order for the emission to propagate from the exoplanet
system, the local cyclotron frequency within the source re-
gion, f max
, must be greater than the local plasma frequency
at every point along the line of sight
νmax
p
< νmax
(7)
c
c
.
Because the electron density of the stellar wind decreases
with distance, this condition is most restrictive at the orbital
distance of the planet. Thus to determine if CMI emission
is able to reach distant observers, it is sufficient to check
that equation (7) is satisfied at the orbital location of the
exoplanet. The emission frequency must also be larger than
the plasma frequency of Earth's ionosphere for it to be ob-
servable by ground based telescopes. Earth's ionosphere has
a number density <106cm−3 corresponding to a maximum
plasma frequency of 10 MHz.
An additional factor that affects whether CMI emission
is generated, is the ratio of the plasma frequency to the elec-
tron cyclotron frequency at the location of the radio wave
generation. CMI is only efficient at generating intense ra-
dio emission in density-depleted regions or regions of high
magnetic field strength. In the preferred source regions, the
in situ plasma frequency is small in comparison to the local
MNRAS 000, 1–14 (2018)
Radio detectability of exoplanets
3
electron cyclotron frequency (Treumann 2006). The exact
ratio required is still uncertain; observations favour a ratio
of νp/νc(cid:46)0.1, while CMI theory supports a ratio closer to 0.4
(Le Queau et al. 1985; Hilgers 1992; Zarka et al. 2001). We
assume that at some location along the poloidal magnetic
field line, the ratio of the plasma to cyclotron frequency is
such that the CMI mechanism is able to efficiently produce
radio emission.
3 MODEL PARAMETERS
To estimate the expected radio flux densities and emission
frequencies of exoplanet emission, we need to describe the
properties of the stars, including the stellar wind properties,
and the properties of the exoplanets. We take the host star
mass, M∗, age, t, and distance from Earth, d, from the Ex-
trasolar Encyclopaedia (Schneider et al. 2011) or the NASA
Exoplanet Archive1. In most cases we can also take the star's
radius, R∗, directly from these catalogues. For main-sequence
stars without a listed radius we use the listed effective stel-
lar temperature and mass to estimate R∗, assuming a mass-
luminosity relation of L ∝ M4 (Duric 2004); pre-main se-
quence stars without measured radii are removed from our
sample.
For most of the exoplanets the observed mass listed is
the projected mass of the planet, Mobs = Mp sin(i), where i
is the inclination angle of the planet's orbit with respect
to the observer. The distribution function of inclinations
for a randomly distributed sample, ignoring selection ef-
fects, is proportional to sin(i) (Halbwachs 1987). For exo-
planets with only a projected masses, we use the expected
value, < sin i >, to estimate the real mass of the exoplan-
ets, Mp = Mobs · (
<sin i>)≈ 1.15 Mobs; otherwise we use the
1
observed mass as the mass of the planet, Mp.
The expected radio flux density for exoplanets with
large eccentricities can vary by factors of 2 – 3 over the course
of the planet's orbit (Stevens 2005). Thus we use the ec-
centricity, e, and semi-major axis, a, listed in the on-line
catalogues for each exoplanet, to calculate the periastron
distance, amin = a(1−e) . The estimated radio flux densities re-
ported here are only for this orbital distance.
The planetary radius is required for estimating both the
planetary magnetic field strength and flux density of the ex-
pected radio emission. For transiting planets, we can use
the measured radius, Rp, listed in the online exoplanet cat-
alogues. For non-transiting planets we calculate the plan-
etary radius following the method outlined in Griessmeier
et al. (2007a). Using the results of numerical simulations for
planetary radii, Griessmeier et al. (2007a) derived analytical
expressions to calculate the radius of a planet of mass Mp,
with an orbital semi-major axis a. For a 'cold' planet
(cid:17)2/3
(8)
Rp(a = ∞) =
1 +
≈ 1.47RJ
(cid:16)
(cid:0)αMp
(cid:1)1/3
(cid:17)2/3
(cid:16) (Mp/MJ)
(Mp/MJ)1/3
(Mmax/MJ)
(Mma x/MJ)
1 +
Mp
1 https://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu
C. R. Lynch et al.
4
where Jupiter's radius is taken to be RJ = 7.1492×109 cm,
α = 0.61 cm3 g−1 for a planet with the same composition as
Jupiter, Mmax = 3.16 MJ , and we use MJ = 1.9×1030 g. The
radius of an irradiated planet is then given by
Rp(a)
(Rp(a)/RJ)
1 + 0.05
(Rp(a = ∞)/RJ) =
Rp(a = ∞) =
Here Teq is the equilibrium temperature of the planet's sur-
face and the coefficients T0 and γ depend on the planetary
mass (see appendix A of Griessmeier et al. (2007a) for more
details).
(9)
T0
.
(cid:20)
(cid:18)Teq
(cid:19)γ(cid:21)
3.1 Stellar Wind Model
The stellar wind velocity and density encountered by an or-
biting magnetised exoplanet plays a significant role in de-
termining both the size of the planet's magnetosphere, as
discussed in section (3.2), and the amount of energy avail-
able for the generation of the planetary radio emission. Close
to the star, the stellar wind is still accelerating and provides
much less input energy for the generation of planetary radio
emission than assuming the quasi-asymptotic wind velocity
of the Sun (Griessmeier et al. 2007a). To avoid overestimat-
ing the expected radio flux densities for small orbital dis-
tances, as in the cases of Hot Jupiters, it is necessary to
use a distance dependent stellar wind model. For simplicity
we employ Parker's isothermal solution for the stellar wind
speed, v(r), at a radial distance r from the surface of the star
(Parker 1958)
v(r)2
c2
s
The wind velocity will pass through sound speed cs, given
by
(cid:18) v(r)2
+ 4rc
r
(cid:18) r
= 4 ln
− ln
− 3.
(10)
(cid:19)
(cid:19)
c2
s
rc
(cid:115)
cs =
kbT
mp
at the critical distance rc
rc =
mpGM∗
4kbT
(12)
where kb is the Boltzmann constant, G is the gravitational
constant, T is the temperature of the stellar wind and equiv-
alent to the coronal temperature for our isothermal model,
and M∗ the mass of the star. In this work we assume the
stellar wind to be composed of protons.
Griessmeier et al. (2007a) showed that the Parker stellar
wind model is sufficient for describing the radial properties
of winds for stars with ages >0.7 Gyr. The youngest objects
in our sample are much younger than 0.7 Gyr, including 8
non-accreting pre-main sequence stars (i.e. weak line T Tauri
(WTT) stars). To check the radial velocity profiles for the
young stars in our sample we compared them to the profiles
resulting from three-dimensional numerical magnetohydro-
dynamic simulations of WTT stellar winds by Vidotto et al.
(2010). Using the case of a magnetic field aligned with the
rotation axis, we estimate a difference in the expected ve-
locities of ∼10% at distances <10R∗ and up to a factor of 2
at large distances (>60RS); this is sufficient for our order-
of-magnitude estimates of the planetary radio emission flux
densities.
t
τ
(cid:16)
1 +
(cid:17)−0.43
To determine the stellar wind velocity at a distance r,
we solve equation (10) numerically, where the coronal tem-
perature is a free parameter. To determine the coronal tem-
perature for main-sequence stars we follow the method out-
lined in Griessmeier et al. (2007a): First we determine the
stellar wind velocity expected at 1 AU given the star's age
and using the expression for the time behaviour of the Solar
wind at 1 AU (Newkirk 1980),
v(1 AU, t) = v0
whose proportionality constants, v0 = 3.971×108 cm s−1 and
τ = 2.56×107 yr, are determined by present-day Solar con-
ditions. Next we adjust the coronal temperature until the
corresponding stellar wind velocity at 1 AU found using
Parker's solution (equation 10) agrees with the value we cal-
culate from equation (13). We then use this temperature to
solve for the final radial profile of the stellar wind velocity for
a range of distances between 0.09 and 200 times the critical
distance rc. For pre-main sequence stars we assume the coro-
nal temperature to be 106 K in agreement with the models
of Vidotto et al. (2010) and solve for the stellar wind radial
profile over the same distance range. Each wind profile is
plotted and visually inspected to ensure that the physically
meaningful solution of Parker's wind model is found.
(13)
For planets orbiting at small distances from their host
stars, the Keplerian velocity of the planet will be comparable
to the stellar wind velocity. These orbits are expected to be
circular due to tidal dissipation and the Keplerian velocity
is then given by
vk(r) =
(14)
.
The effective velocity of the stellar wind plasma relative to
the motion of the planet is then
(cid:114) M∗G
(cid:113)
r
(cid:219)M∗, expected for
The radial distance dependence of the stellar wind den-
(cid:219)M∗
sity is determined using the mass-loss rate,
each star
n(r) =
(16)
where v(r) is the stellar wind velocity at the orbital distance
of the exoplanet.
4πmpv(r)r2
The stellar mass-loss rate is found independent of the
wind solution and is based on the age of the star. Charge
exchange interactions between the neutral hydrogen of the
local interstellar medium and an ionised stellar wind creates
a population of hot neutral hydrogen surrounding the star.
The absorption of this hot neutral hydrogen can be detected
in high-resolution Lyman–α spectra. The amount of absorp-
tion measured can be used as a diagnostic for the stellar
mass-loss rate (Wood et al. 2002). Using Solar-type stars
with both measured X-ray luminosities and HI Lyman–α
absorption, Wood et al. (2002, 2005) observed an empirical
relationship between the mass-loss rate of these stars and
their coronal X-ray surface flux. Because the coronal X–ray
surface flux is observed to evolve with stellar age, Wood et al.
(2002, 2005) then related the stellar mass-loss rates to their
age,
(cid:219)M ∝ t2.33±0.55. This scaling relationship is only valid for
stars with X–ray fluxes FX < 106 erg cm−2 s−1, and excludes
MNRAS 000, 1–14 (2018)
(11)
veff =
vk(r)2 + v(r)2.
(15)
the youngest and most active Solar-type stars (Wood et al.
2002, 2005).
Alternatively, Alvarado-G´omez et al. (2016a,b) com-
bined Zeeman–Doppler imaging of magnetic structures for
young Solar-type stars and numerical codes used for Solar
system space weather modelling, to develop a self-consistent
and data-driven characterisation of the wind environment
for young active Solar-type stars. These models were then
used to derive a fully-simulated, mass-loss activity relation
(cid:219)M ∝ F
0.79+0.19
−0.14
X
.
(17)
. Using the relation between the X–ray surface flux and age,
FX ∝ t1.74±0.34 (Ayres 1997), this results in the following scal-
ing relationship for the mass-loss evolution of main-sequence
Solar-type stars:
(cid:219)M∗ ∝ t−1.37.
This expression is valid for high-activity stars with X–
ray fluxes up to 100 times that of the Sun. Scaling equa-
tion (18) using the measured mass-loss rate for the Sun,
(cid:219)M(cid:12) = 1014 M(cid:12) yr−1, we use it to calculate the mass-loss rates
for the main-sequence stars in our sample. For the WTT
stars in our sample we assume the mass-loss rate to be
10−9 M(cid:12) yr−1, consistent with the modelling of winds from
WTT stars by Vidotto et al. (2010).
For a Parker spiral, the interplanetary magnetic field,
(Br ,Bφ), at a distance r from the surface of the star is given
by
(cid:17)2
(cid:16) r0
r
Ωr
veff
Br = B0
and
Bφ = Br
where r0 = R∗, B0 is the magnetic field strength at the surface
of the star, and Ωs = 2π/Ps is the angular velocity of a star
with rotational period Ps. The interplanetary magnetic field
perpendicular to the stellar wind flow can then be calculated
using
B⊥ =
B2
r
+ B2
φ sin
arctan
− arctan
.
(21)
(cid:20)
(cid:19)
(cid:18) Bφ
Br
(cid:17)(cid:21)
(cid:16) vk
v
(cid:113)
main-sequence Solar-type stars are thought to lose sig-
nificant angular momentum through the coupling of their
magnetic fields and wind, causing them to spin down over
time (Bouvier et al. 2014). Similar to Griessmeier et al.
(2007b), we estimate the rotational periods for the main-
sequence stars using
Ps ∝(cid:16)
1 +
t
τ
(cid:17)0.7
where t
is the system age, and we take the time con-
stant τ = 2.56×107 yr and the rotational period of the Sun
P(cid:12) = 25.5 days.
The rotational evolution of young, still forming stars is
quite different from the scenario for the older main-sequence
stars. In the first few Myr of a pre-main sequence star's evo-
lution, its rotation is determined by interactions between
the forming star and its circumstellar disk, which removes
angular momentum as the star contracts towards the main-
sequence. The circumstellar disks are expected to dissipate
MNRAS 000, 1–14 (2018)
Radio detectability of exoplanets
5
on a timescale of a few Myr (e.g. Haisch et al. 2000) and
the rotation of the pre-main sequence star is predicted to
become faster as the young star continues its contraction
but no longer has an efficient braking mechanism (Karim
et al. 2016). The rotational periods of pre-main sequence
stars have been measured in several star forming regions,
showing a large scatter in the rotational properties among
stars that are part of a supposedly coeval population. This
scatter could be the result of a wide range of initial con-
ditions, like the primordial disk fraction, and hint at the
importance of environmental effects on rotation properties
(Karim et al. 2016). Of the 8 WTT stars in our sample only
V830 Tau b has a previously measured rotation period of
2.741 days (Donati et al. 2016). For the other 7 objects we
use a rotational period of 4.31 days, which is the average
rotational period measured for the WTT stars found in the
Taurus–Auriga star forming region (Grankin 2016).
Using literature magnetic field results, Vidotto et al.
(2014) investigated how the large-scale surface magnetic
fields of low-mass stars (∼0.1 - 2 M(cid:12)), reconstructed via
Zeeman–Doppler imaging, vary with age. The sample Vi-
dotto et al. (2014) used consisted of 73 stars ranging in
evolutionary stages from accreting pre-main sequence stars
to main-sequence objects (1 Myr < t <10 Gyr). For the non-
accreting dwarf stars they find that the unsigned average
large-scale surface field scales with age t as
< Bv >∝ t0.655±0.045.
(23)
This correlation holds over two orders of magnitude in
< Bv > and three orders of magnitude in t. Folsom et al.
(2016) did a similar study which focused on a more well-
defined sample of stars, with ages established from clusters
or co-moving groups, finding a correlation between magnetic
field strength and age that agrees with Vidotto et al. (2014).
To estimate the surface magnetic field strengths, B0, for the
host stars in our sample we scale equation (23) using the
appropriate values for the Sun's age, t(cid:12) = 4.6 Gyr, and min-
imum large-scale surface magnetic field, < Bv,(cid:12) > = 1.89 G.
3.2 Planetary magnetosphere
Predictions of the maximum emission frequency for the plan-
etary radio emission require estimates of the planet's mag-
netic field strength at its surface. Scaling relations are used
to relate the magnetic field intensity of a planet's dynamo
to the physical properties of the planet. Griessmeier et al.
(2007a,b, 2011) use scaling relations that assume a balance
of Coriolis force and Lorentz force; in these relations the
magnetic field strength depends on the rotation rate of the
planet.
In contrast, Christensen & Aubert (2006) assume that
the magnetic field strength is determined by the energy flux
through the dynamo region and is independent of the plan-
etary rotation rate. Using direct numerical simulations of
planetary dynamos over a wide range of parameters, Chris-
tensen (2010) tested the predicted magnetic field strengths
of various scaling relations. These tests showed that mag-
netic field scaling based on the available energy flux bet-
ter matched the results of the numerical simulations. Fur-
ther Christensen et al. (2009) generalised the energy flux
scaling relation and showed that the predicted magnetic
field strengths agree with observations of a wide range of
(18)
(19)
(20)
(22)
6
C. R. Lynch et al.
rapidly rotating objects, from Earth and Jupiter to brown
dwarfs and low-mass main-sequence stars. In the following,
we choose to use the scaling relation of Christensen et al.
(2009) to predict the magnetic field strengths for our sam-
ple of exoplanets.
For our sample of exoplanets we use the simple expres-
sion provided by Reiners & Christensen (2010) that relates
the mean magnetic field strength at the surface of the dy-
namo to a planet's mass, radius, and luminosity Lp
(cid:20)(Mp/MJ)(Lp/L(cid:12))
(cid:21)1/6
.
(24)
Bdyn = 4.8 kG
(RP/RJ)7
For massive brown dwarfs and stars, the dynamo surface
is located close to the object's surface and Bdyn represents
the mean surface magnetic field. However for giant planets
the surface of the dynamo region lies within the interior of
the planet and the surface magnetic field is attenuated due
to the overlaying material. Reiners & Christensen (2010)
assume that the depth of the dynamo surface is inversely
proportional to Mp and so the dipole field strength at the
equator of the planet is related to the mean magnetic field
strength at the surface of the dynamo by
(cid:18)
(cid:19)3
.
(25)
Beq
dip
=
Bdyn
√
2
2
1 − 0.17
Mp/MJ
The polar dipole field strength is then, Bmax
dip. The
luminosity of each planet is calculated using the power-law
expressions in Burrows et al. (2001) for massive planets.
= 2 Beq
p
The radius of the planetary magnetosphere is deter-
mined by the pressure balance between the planet's mag-
netic field and the external stellar wind pressure, including
the wind thermal, magnetic, and ram pressure.
Bp(r)2
8π
= 2nkBT +
+ mpnv2
(26)
eff
B2
r
where B∗ =
φ is the magnitude of the stellar mag-
netic field at the location of the planet. Assuming the plan-
etary magnetic field is a dipole, the magnetic field strength,
Bp(r), scales with distance as (Rp/R)3. Substituting this dis-
tance scaling and solving for the magnetospheric radius, we
find
B2∗
8π
+ B2
(cid:113)
= (2.44)1/3
Rm
Rp
(Bmax
p
)2
mpnv2
veff
+ 2nkBT + B2∗
8π
.
(27)
1/6
(cid:17)
(cid:16)
8π
Included in equation (27) is a correction factor of 2.44, which
accounts for the enhancement of the magnetic field at the
magnetosphere boundary due to currents (Mead & Beard
1964).
The magnetosphere of planets with weak magnetic field
strengths or those embedded in dense stellar winds, as in
the case for young systems, can be compressed to such an
extent that its radius is less than the planet's radius. For
these planets we assume the magnetospheric radius is equal
to the planetary radius.
4 EXOPLANET CENSUS
To generate our sample of exoplanets we use the full cata-
logue of the Extrasolar Planet Encyclopaedia and the con-
firmed source catalogue for the NASA Exoplanet archive
from 2018 February 19. After removing common sources we
combine these two catalogues into a master sample of 4133
sources. Due to the stellar wind models we use to estimate
the radio flux densities, we chose to focus on exoplanets
orbiting main-sequence and pre-main sequence dwarf stars
(spectral types F, G, K, and M) and remove all other exo-
planet systems from our sample. After removing the non-
dwarf type host stars we are left with 1287 sources. We
also remove all exoplanets with masses greater than 13 MJ
– objects with masses greater than this are more likely to
be brown dwarf objects than planets. Making this cut re-
moves 35 objects. For terrestrial planets Driscoll & Olson
(2011) modified the scaling relations from Christensen &
Aubert (2006) by assuming the planetary internal struc-
ture to be similar to that of the Earth and used an op-
timal mantle convection model that maximises the avail-
able heat flux to the planet's core to drive the dynamo. For
this mass range, they found the planetary surface magnetic
fields are reasonably constant up to planetary masses twenty
times that of the Earth (MP < 0.06 MJ ) and roughly ∼3Bs,E ,
where Bs,E = 0.3 G. This magnetic field strength corresponds
to maximum emission frequencies < 10 MHz and unobserv-
able by ground-based radio telescopes. Thus we remove all
sources with masses MP < 0.06 MJ from our sample; this re-
moves 95 objects.
There are several measured physical quantities that are
required for calculating either the expected radio flux den-
sity or emission frequency, they include: both the mass of the
exoplanet and the star, the distance to the exoplanet system,
the semi-major axis of the exoplanet orbit, and the age of
the star. Exoplanets that are missing any one of these pa-
rameters are removed from our sample of sources. Pre-main
sequence stars are removed if they do not have a measured
stellar radius. Main-sequence stars are removed if they do
not have a measured stellar radius and temperature; main-
sequence stars with only one of these quantities remain in
our sample. After making these selections this leaves us with
a total of 597 exoplanets in our sample.
We calculate the expected radio flux density and emis-
sion frequency for each of the 597 exoplanets in our sample.
Of the 597 objects, 69 (∼12%) do not satisfy the propaga-
tion condition in equation (7). The results for the remaining
sources are shown in Figure (1) for both the kinetic (1a) and
magnetic (1b) RBL. In this figure the estimated radio flux
density is plotted as a function of the maximum emission fre-
quency (bottom axis) or the maximum planetary magnetic
field (top axis). The colour of each symbol corresponds to
the natural log of the semi-major axis for the star–planet
system, objects with declinations < +30◦ are represented by
a triangle symbols and those with declination > +30◦ corre-
spond to the circles. The size of each symbol represents the
estimated mass-loss rate (1a) or surface magnetic field (1b)
of the host star based on its age.
Comparing the estimated flux densities for the kinetic
and magnetic RBL in Figure (1), its clear that in most cases
the magnetic RBL predicts radio flux densities at least or-
der of magnitude brighter than for the kinetic RBL. How-
ever, there are a few exoplanets where the opposite is true –
adding further support to consider both magnetic and kine-
matic RBL when determining best candidates for radio de-
tections. Similar to the modelling results of both Lazio et al.
(2004) and Griessmeier et al. (2007b, 2011), we find a general
MNRAS 000, 1–14 (2018)
Radio detectability of exoplanets
7
c
i
t
e
n
i
k
e
h
t
g
n
i
s
u
y
t
i
s
n
e
d
x
u
fl
o
i
d
a
r
d
e
t
c
e
p
x
e
d
n
a
,
)
s
i
x
a
p
o
t
(
h
t
g
n
e
r
t
s
d
l
e
fi
c
i
t
e
n
g
a
m
y
r
a
t
e
n
a
l
p
i
g
n
d
n
o
p
s
e
r
r
o
c
d
n
a
)
s
i
x
a
m
o
t
t
o
b
(
y
c
n
e
u
q
e
r
f
g
n
i
v
r
e
s
b
o
m
u
m
i
x
a
m
d
e
t
c
i
d
e
r
p
e
h
T
.
1
e
r
u
g
i
F
s
i
d
n
a
e
l
p
m
a
s
l
l
u
f
e
h
t
s
s
a
p
m
o
c
n
e
o
t
n
e
s
o
h
c
s
i
l
e
d
o
m
h
c
a
e
r
o
f
s
i
x
a
-
y
e
h
T
.
s
r
a
t
s
e
p
y
t
-
f
r
a
w
d
g
n
i
t
i
b
r
o
s
t
e
n
a
l
p
o
x
e
n
w
o
n
k
f
o
n
o
i
t
a
l
u
p
o
p
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
e
h
t
r
o
f
l
e
d
o
m
y
g
r
e
n
e
)
b
(
c
i
t
e
n
g
a
m
d
n
a
)
a
(
MNRAS 000, 1–14 (2018)
M
A
E
L
G
e
h
t
f
o
t
i
m
i
l
n
o
i
t
a
n
i
l
c
e
d
e
h
t
o
t
i
g
n
d
n
o
p
s
e
r
r
o
c
,
s
d
n
o
p
s
e
r
r
o
c
r
u
o
l
o
c
e
h
t
;
r
a
t
s
t
s
o
h
e
h
t
f
o
)
b
(
h
t
g
n
e
r
t
s
d
l
e
fi
◦
c
i
t
e
n
g
a
m
e
c
a
f
r
u
s
r
o
)
a
(
e
t
a
r
s
s
o
l
–
s
s
a
m
d
e
t
c
i
d
e
r
p
e
h
t
o
t
s
d
n
o
p
s
e
r
r
o
c
l
o
b
m
y
s
h
c
a
e
f
o
e
z
i
s
e
h
T
.
s
e
r
u
g
fi
o
w
t
e
s
e
h
t
n
e
e
w
t
e
b
t
n
e
r
e
ff
d
i
0
3
+
<
s
n
o
i
t
a
n
i
l
c
e
d
h
t
i
w
s
m
e
t
s
y
s
t
n
e
s
e
r
p
e
r
s
l
o
b
m
y
s
e
l
g
n
a
i
r
T
.
m
e
t
s
y
s
t
e
n
a
l
p
o
x
e
e
h
t
f
o
s
i
x
a
r
o
j
a
m
-
i
m
e
s
e
h
t
f
o
g
o
l
l
a
r
u
t
a
n
e
h
t
o
t
t
f
e
l
p
o
t
e
h
t
n
i
s
w
o
r
r
a
e
h
t
y
b
n
e
v
i
g
e
r
a
s
e
u
l
a
v
d
e
t
c
i
d
e
r
p
e
s
e
h
t
r
o
f
s
e
i
t
n
i
a
t
r
e
c
n
u
l
a
c
i
p
y
t
e
h
T
.
t
i
m
i
l
s
i
h
t
f
o
h
t
r
o
n
s
n
o
i
t
a
n
i
l
c
e
d
e
v
a
h
s
l
o
b
m
y
s
e
l
c
r
i
c
h
t
i
w
s
t
e
n
a
l
p
o
x
e
;
)
1
.
5
n
o
i
t
c
e
s
e
e
s
(
y
e
v
r
u
s
.
r
e
n
r
o
c
(a)(b) 8
C. R. Lynch et al.
trend of decreasing flux density as the maximum emission
frequency increases. Generally the higher emission frequen-
cies are associated with larger planetary masses (Reiners &
Christensen 2010), and from the colour–mapping its clear
that the most massive planets in our sample are orbiting at
large distances from their host star, resulting in low radio
flux densities. This trend reflects a lack of high mass planets
in orbits with small semi-major axes. This deficit of massive
planets at small orbital radii is a well known phenomena,
explained by strong tidal interactions that lead to a rapid
decay of the planetary orbital radius over a short period of
time, with the planet eventually reaching the Roche limit of
the host star and is effectively destroyed (Patzold & Rauer
2002; Jiang et al. 2003). The outliers to this trend are those
objects that are the best candidates for radio observations.
The uncertainties associated with the estimated ra-
dio flux densities and emission frequencies are considerable.
They are represented by the arrows in the upper left cor-
ner of Figure (1). Similar to Griessmeier et al. (2007a) we
estimate the uncertainty for the emission frequency and ra-
dio flux density by considering the different sources of error
and calculate the range of results for a select group of ex-
oplanets from our sample. Using the uncertainties reported
in the NASA Exoplanet Archive and the Extrasolar Planet
Encyclopaedia we find that the largest uncertainties are for
the exoplanet mass and stellar age. We choose four sources
(V830 Tau b, TAP 26 b, WASP–38 b, and tau Boo b) which
span a range of ages between 0.002 – 5 Gyr and planetary
masses between 0.7 – 4.97 MJ . The uncertainty in the exo-
planet masses reported by these two archives can be as much
as a factor of 3 and for the ages up to a factor of 4. We com-
pare the emission frequencies and estimated flux densities
using the kinetic and magnetic RBL to the original values,
after varying these two parameters by a factor of 3 for the
planet mass and a factor of 4 for the stellar age. We find
that the variation in the planet mass has little effect on the
estimated flux densities, changing them by factors <2, but
can change the estimated emission frequencies by up to a
factor of 3. We find that the variation in the age greatly af-
fects the estimated flux densities using the kinetic RBL for
all the sources with variations up to a factor of 6, however
only the magnetic RBL values for the younger two sources
(V830 Tau b and TAP 26 b) are significantly affected by
the age variation with a change of up to a factor of 7. To be
conservative we assume the uncertainty in our flux estimates
to be an order of magnitude and for our estimated emission
frequencies a factor of 3; these are in agreement with the
modelling results of Griessmeier et al. (2007a). Given these
large uncertainties, the estimated values reported here are
intended to be a guide for future observations and are not
considered to be accurate.
Generally, the range of radio frequencies and expected
radio flux densities shown in Figure (1) agree with previ-
ous large comparative studies by Lazio et al. (2004) and
Griessmeier et al. (2007b, 2011). We see the same trends in
the predicted radio flux densities as a function of the max-
imum emission frequency as these authors. However com-
parisons of individual sources reveal significant differences
between our model and the models of these authors. Both
Lazio et al. (2004) and Griessmeier et al. (2007b) use different
scaling relations as to that used here to predict the maxi-
mum emission frequency leading to large difference between
our results and theirs for specific sources. As previously dis-
cussed in the literature the scaling relation used by Lazio
et al. (2004) was disproven through observations of the Solar
system and should not be used to predict planetary emission
frequencies (Griessmeier et al. 2007b). The scaling relation
from Griessmeier et al. (2007b) is rotationally dependent and
generally predicts lower maximum emission frequencies than
the rotationally independent relations we used here. The dif-
ference is not as large, and within the uncertainties of the
predicted frequencies, if we consider the non-rotationally de-
pendent frequencies predicted by Griessmeier et al. (2011),
with differences of less than a factor of 3. To check our pre-
dicted emission frequencies we compared the results for the
specific sources modelled by Reiners & Christensen (2010),
finding our values to be within a factor of 2 of their predic-
tions.
We use very different scaling relations for the mass-loss
rate and stellar surface magnetic field as to that used by
Griessmeier et al. (2007b, 2011). The relations chosen in
this work are more appropriate for estimating these phys-
ical quantities over a larger range in stellar age, down to a
few Myr, and allowed for more accurate predictions of the
emission for the young sources in our sample. The scaling
relations used by Griessmeier et al. (2007b, 2011) are appro-
priate for sources with ages t >0.5 Gyr. We find that the
disparity between the expected flux densities, assuming a
common emission frequency, is well with our uncertainties
(factors ≤3) for objects with ages similar to that of the Sun
(2.0 Gyr < t < 5.0 Gyr) than for the sources that are either
very young or very old. Also note that the flux densities pre-
dicted by Reiners & Christensen (2010) can be much higher
than ours, even though our frequencies are in agreement,
this is because they assume the stellar wind velocity to be
that of the Solar wind at the location of the Earth – this
is a significant over estimate for close–in planets where the
wind is still accelerating.
5 COMPARISON TO OBSERVATIONS
In Figure (2) we focus on the exoplanets expected to produce
the brightest radio emission at observable frequencies; again
the values from both kinetic (2a) and magnetic (2b) RBL
are shown. The 5σ sensitivity limits of three low-frequency
radio telescopes are represented by the green (GMRT), grey
(Low Frequency Array; LOFAR), and blue (MWA) shaded
regions. We use the measured sensitivities reported for the
MWA in Lenc et al. (2017), for LOFAR in van Haarlem et al.
(2013), and for the GMRT in Gupta et al. (2017), scaling
each to an integration time of 8 hours.
The integration time is chosen to maximise the sensi-
tivity of the instruments while also taking into account the
expected variability of the exoplanet emission. Due to the
narrow beaming of CMI emission, it is expected that ob-
servers will only be able to detect the expected radio emis-
sion during orbital phases where the active magnetic field
lines are suitably oriented relative to the line of sight to
the planet. Simulating the expected radio emission proper-
ties for exoplanets, Hess & Zarka (2011) showed that the
detectable emission only covers a few percent of the orbital
phase. The majority of the exoplanets that are expected to
produce observable radio emission are Hot Jupiter systems
MNRAS 000, 1–14 (2018)
Radio detectability of exoplanets
9
c
i
t
e
n
i
k
e
h
t
g
n
i
s
u
y
t
i
s
n
e
d
x
u
fl
o
i
d
a
r
d
e
t
c
e
p
x
e
d
n
a
,
)
s
i
x
a
p
o
t
(
h
t
g
n
e
r
t
s
d
l
e
fi
c
i
t
e
n
g
a
m
y
r
a
t
e
n
a
l
p
i
g
n
d
n
o
p
s
e
r
r
o
c
d
n
a
)
s
i
x
a
m
o
t
t
o
b
(
y
c
n
e
u
q
e
r
f
g
n
i
v
r
e
s
b
o
m
u
m
i
x
a
m
d
e
t
c
i
d
e
r
p
e
h
T
.
2
e
r
u
g
i
F
.
s
e
r
u
g
fi
o
w
t
e
h
t
n
e
e
w
t
e
b
t
n
e
r
e
ff
d
i
s
i
s
i
x
a
-
y
e
h
t
n
o
s
e
u
l
a
v
f
o
e
g
n
a
r
e
h
t
n
i
a
g
a
;
n
o
i
s
s
i
m
e
o
i
d
a
r
t
s
e
t
h
g
i
r
b
e
h
t
e
c
u
d
o
r
p
o
t
d
e
t
c
e
p
x
e
s
t
c
e
j
b
o
n
o
d
e
r
t
n
e
c
l
e
d
o
m
y
g
r
e
n
e
)
b
(
c
i
t
e
n
g
a
m
d
n
a
)
a
(
e
w
e
s
o
h
t
e
r
a
s
e
c
r
u
o
s
d
e
fi
i
t
n
e
d
i
e
h
T
.
s
n
o
i
g
e
r
d
e
d
a
h
s
)
A
W
M
(
e
u
b
l
d
n
a
,
)
R
A
F
O
L
(
y
e
r
g
,
)
T
R
M
G
(
n
e
e
r
g
e
h
t
y
b
d
e
t
a
c
i
d
n
i
e
r
a
s
e
p
o
c
s
e
l
e
t
o
i
d
a
r
y
c
n
e
u
q
e
r
f
-
w
o
l
e
e
r
h
t
f
o
s
e
i
t
i
v
i
t
i
s
n
e
s
e
s
e
h
T
.
)
1
(
e
r
u
g
i
F
n
i
d
e
b
i
r
c
s
e
d
s
a
e
r
a
s
l
o
b
m
y
s
d
n
a
s
r
u
o
l
o
c
r
e
h
t
o
l
l
A
.
)
8
1
0
2
(
.
l
a
t
e
c
n
e
L
y
b
y
e
v
r
u
s
A
W
M
V
s
e
k
o
t
S
y
k
s
-
l
l
a
e
h
t
g
n
i
s
u
d
e
s
y
l
a
n
a
MNRAS 000, 1–14 (2018)
(a)(b) 10
C. R. Lynch et al.
Table 1. The properties of the 18 exoplanet systems expected to be detectable in the circular polarisation survey by Lenc et al. (2018) .
Included values are the right ascension and declination (RA and Dec), the mass (Mp ) and radius (Rp ) of the planet, the semi-major axis
(a), the distance to the system (d), the age of the host star (t), the predicted maximum emission frequency, νmax
, and flux density from
our kinetic, Sν,kin, and magnetic, Sν,mag, models, as well as the best 3σ limit available at 150 MHz from the literature, S150 ( Hal13:
Hallinan et al. (2013); Sir14: Sirothia et al. (2014); Mur15: Murphy et al. (2015)). The values for the full sample of sources is available
online.
c
Name
BD+20 1790 b
GJ 876 b
HATS–24 b
HD 130322 b
HD 210702 b
HD 5891 b
HD 73256 b
OGLE2–TR–L9 b
Pr 0211 b
TAP 26 b
tau Boo b
V830 Tau b
WASP–14 b
WASP–140 b
WASP–167 b
WASP–18 b
WASP–43 b
WASP–77 A b
RA
(J2000)
Dec
(J2000)
07:23:44 +20:24:59
−14:15:12
22:53:13
−61:44:50
17:55:34
−00:16:53
14:47:33
22:11:51 +16:02:26
01:00:33 +20:17:33
−30:02:15
08:36:23
−61:08:47
11:07:55
08:42:11 +19:16:37
04:18:52 +17:23:17
13:47:16 +17:27:25
04:33:10 +24:33:43
14:33:06 +21:53:41
−20:27:03
04:01:33
−35:32:58
13:04:10
−45:40:40
01:37:25
−09:48:22
10:19:38
−07:03:38
02:28:37
Mp
(MJ )
07.33
02.28
02.44
01.32
02.18
08.74
02.15
04.50
01.88
01.91
04.97
00.70
07.34
02.44
08.00
10.43
01.78
01.76
Rp
(RJ )
a
(AU)
d
(pc)
t
(Gyr)
νmax
c
(MHz)
Sν,kin
(mJy)
Sν,mag
(mJy)
S150
(mJy)
Reference
1.04
1.07
1.49
1.06
1.08
1.03
1.11
1.61
1.10
1.09
1.10
0.99
1.28
1.44
1.58
1.16
0.93
1.21
0.07
0.21
0.03
0.09
1.20
0.76
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.10
0.05
0.06
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.02
0.01
0.02
25.4
4.7
510
29.76
55.93
150.6
36.52
900
170
147
15.6
150
160
180
381
105.49
80
93
0.057
2.5
0.88
0.35
1.4
1.5
0.83
0.66
0.79
0.017
2.52
0.002
0.75
1.6
1.29
0.63
0.4
1.0
1097
64
61
58
78
409
74
132
64
351
159
198
284
60
240
504
98
59
1.4
1.8
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
1.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.3
0.1
209.1
0.1
3.4
9.4
4.2
2.0
64.2
5.0
4.8
278.0
269.2
465.0
10.2
4.4
10.9
287.1
173.6
109.6
<17.3 Mur15
<4.0
Sir14
<1.2
Hal13
<3.4
Mur15
with orbital periods of ≤ 7 days (Schneider et al. 2011). As-
suming the emission is visible for 5% of the Hot Jupiter
orbit, the longest time-scale we expect to see variability is
∼8 hours.
The generally higher expected flux densities using the
magnetic RBL means that there is a much larger number
of potentially detectable planets for this case. At maximum
emission frequencies > 10 MHz and using the magnetic RBL,
11 exoplanets are expected to produce Sν > 100 mJy level
emission, 18 exoplanets with 10 ,mJy< Sν <100 mJy, and 60
are expected to produce emission at 1 mJy< Sν <10 mJy lev-
els. In the kinetic case the maximum predicted flux density
is 3.0 mJy, with 5 objects expected to produce emission at
Sν >1 mJy level. The youngest Hot Jupiters in our sample
are expected to produce the highest radio powers in either
the kinetic or magnetic cases. However, accounting for the
distances to these sources, which can be large (d >100 pc),
we find that slightly older (a ∼2 Gyr) Hot Jupiters that are
nearby (d <20 pc) are expected to produce radio emission
with similar flux densities (e.g. GJ 876 b for kinetic RBL
and τ Boo b for magnetic RBL). In the following we outline
two observational campaigns to look for the radio emission
predicted in section (2).
5.1 MWA observations at 200 MHz
As demonstrated in Lynch et al. (2017), because the MWA is
confusion limited, the sensitivity of this instrument is much
greater in circular polarisation imaging than in total inten-
sity. This makes exoplanets, whose emission is expected to be
highly circularly polarised, prime candidates for MWA cir-
cular polarisations studies. Lenc et al. (2018) recently com-
pleted the first all-sky survey in circular polarisation using
archival visibility data from the Galactic and Extragalactic
All-Sky MWA Survey (GLEAM, Hurley-Walker et al. 2017).
The survey covers declinations south of +30◦ and north of
−86◦ with a total sky coverage of 30900 sq. degrees. Lenc et
al. (2018) used the visibility data for the 169 – 200 MHz and
200 – 230 MHz frequency bands, creating a final mosaic of
the sky centred at 200 MHz. This survey achieved an angu-
lar resolution of ∼3(cid:48) and typical sensitivity of 3.0 mJy over
most of the survey region for the mosaic image. The data
reduction strategy used for this survey is described in detail
by Lenc et al. (2018) .
In Figure (2) we identify the group of exoplanets ex-
pected to be detectable the survey by Lenc et al. (2018) ,
assuming a 5σ value of 15 mJy. This selection takes into
account the expected uncertainties for both the maximum
emission frequency and radio flux density, selecting sources
with maximum emission frequencies ν > 56 MHz and flux
densities Sν > 1.5 mJy. This sample includes 18 sources,
whose physical parameters are listed in Table (1). All of
these objects are Jupiter-size planets, the majority of which
have masses MP > MJ . Roughly ∼78% of the selected sources
are also Hot Jupiters with semi-major axes a < 0.1 AU; all of
them are young with ages ≤ 2.5 Gyr. The exoplanet distance
does not seem to be as restrictive as suggested by Griessmeier
et al. (2007b) when determining the brightest candidates,
only 28% of our selected sources have distances < 50 pc. Our
calculations show that young sources with small orbital radii
can be located at distances of (cid:38)100 pc and still produce de-
tectable emission.
The predicted maximum emission frequencies and radio
flux densities from the kinetic and magnetic RBL are also
listed in Table (1). Only V830 Tau b and BD+20 1790 b
are predicted to produce observable levels of radio emission
using either the magnetic and kinetic RBL. Both V830 Tau
b and BD+20 1790 b are very young and expected to en-
MNRAS 000, 1–14 (2018)
Table 2. Our measured 3σ flux density, Sν , and derived lumi-
nosity, L,limits for both our MWA and GMRT observations.
Name
Sν
(mJy)
L
(erg s−1)
MWA limits at 200 MHz
<12.4
<4.5
<18.2
<8.1
<14.5
<8.2
<6.8
BD+20 1790 b
GJ 876 b
HATS–24 b
HD 130322 b
HD 210702 b
HD 5891 b
HD 73256 b
OGLE2–TR–L9 b <13.7
<14.7
Pr 0211 b
<16.8
TAP 26 b
tau Boo b
<19.0
<45.3
V830 Tau b
<32.0
WASP–14 b
<4.7
WASP–140 b
<7.1
WASP–167 b
WASP–18 b
<4.1
<6.8
WASP–43 b
WASP–77 A b
<6.0
<1.4×1023
<1.8×1021
<8.5×1025
<1.3×1023
<8.2×1023
<3.4×1024
<1.6×1023
<2.0×1026
<7.7×1024
<6.5×1024
<8.3×1022
<1.8×1025
<1.5×1025
<2.7×1024
<1.9×1025
<8.2×1023
<7.8×1023
<9.2×1023
V830 Tau b
<4.5
GMRT limits at 150 MHz
<5.9×1024
counter dense stellar winds and strong magnetic fields which
inject significant energy flux into their magnetospheres. For
only one source, GJ 876 b, does the kinetic RBL predict de-
tectable radio emission while the magnetic RBL does not.
Comparing the dissipated magnetic and kinetic power as a
function of distance its clear that GJ 876 b is located at a
sufficient distance from its host star such that the kinetic
RBL dominates over the magnetic RBL; for the 17 other
sources the opposite is true.
Only 4 of these sources have previous radio upper limits,
also listed in (1), and so the limits reported here are new for
most of these sources. Using the mosaic images from Lenc
et al. (2018) , we did a targeted search of the 18 sources for
significant circularly polarised emission above the estimated
local image noise. No radio source was detected at the loca-
tion of the exoplanets we considered. To place limits on the
circular polarised emission from these sources, we measured
the rms in a box centred on the location of the source and
having a size several times the synthesised beam. The 3σ
upper limits are listed in Table (2). We also list in Table (2)
the luminosity limits assuming the emission is steady and
we ignore any beaming effects (Ω = 4π). For 10 out of the
18 sources we targeted, the upper limits are lower than the
expected flux densities from either the magnetic or kinetic
RBL. Taking into account the uncertainty associated with
the flux density estimates, if the predicted emission levels
are an order-of-magnitude lower only 7 of those sources still
have emission that is above our 3σ limits.
In Figure (3) we compare the luminosity limits from the
literature to those reported here. The MWA upper limits are
unique in that they place limits on the exoplanet radio emis-
sion within a new frequency range (169 – 230 MHz). This is
important because of the expected sharp cutoff in emission
MNRAS 000, 1–14 (2018)
Radio detectability of exoplanets
11
frequency. Complete coverage of all available low-frequency
observing bands is necessary to rule out non-detections due
to observing at the wrong frequency. The MWA limits we re-
port here are comparable to the best limits already reported
in the literature.
5.2 GMRT observations of V830 Tau b
The location of V830 Tau b in the sky is such that the
GLEAM survey only observed its position during a single
epoch with a total time on source of 12 minutes. The lack
of coverage for this position contributes greatly to its high
rms measured in the circular polarisation survey of Lenc et
al. (2018) . As this is an interesting source, given its high
predicted radio flux densities, we observed this source using
the GMRT to try to place better constraints on the radio
emission from this source.
We observed V830 Tau b in three 8-hour observing
epochs on Dec 03, 05, 06 2017 for a total of on-source time
of 24 hours. Due to the highly beamed nature of the radio
emission we expect that the emission will only be observ-
able over orbital and/or rotational phases where the beam
of emission is optimally aligned with our line of sight. If V830
Tau b is tidally locked, we expect the rotational period to be
equivalent to its 4.93 day period. Therefore we asked for our
observations to be scheduled in such a way to maximise our
orbital coverage. With the 24 hours of observational time we
were granted, we achieved coverage of 20% of the orbit. For
each of our observations we observed over a bandwidth of 16
MHz centred at 156 MHz. We observed the primary calibra-
tors 3C48, 3C147 and a secondary calibrator PKS 0428+205.
To reduce and image the data we used the Source Peeling
and Atmospheric Modelling (SPAM) software (Intema et al.
2009). SPAM is a data reduction python module that uses
the NRAO Astronomical Image Processing Software (AIPS;
Greisen 2003) via the ParselTongue interface (Kettenis et al.
2006) and Obit (Cotton 2008).
We give a brief summary of the data reduction pro-
cess of the SPAM pipeline; a more detailed outline of the
pipeline is given by Intema et al. (2017). The SPAM re-
duction pipeline calibrates and images the data in a two–
step process. During the first step, calibration solutions are
derived for our two primary calibrator sources, 3C47 and
3C148. These solutions are found incrementally over itera-
tions of RFI flagging and derivations of the complex gain
and bandpass solutions. SPAM sets the flux scale by assum-
ing a point source model and uses the flux densities and
spectral indices from Scaife & Heald (2012). To select the
best calibrator scan a weight factor was calculated from the
number of active antennas and the inverse variance of the
gain normalised amplitudes. The best calibrator scan is the
one with the highest weight factor. The calibration tables
from the selected primary calibrator were then applied to
the target field scans and basic RFI flagging was applied.
The pipeline then performs initial phase calibration and as-
trometry correction of the target field using a sky model
derived from the NVSS (Condon et al. 1998).
The second step begins with three rounds of direction-
independent phase-only self-calibration, during which vari-
ous automated flagging routines are used between the cycles
of imaging and self-calibration to reduce the residual RFI
and clip statistical outliers. SPAM then performs facet-based
12
C. R. Lynch et al.
Figure 3. Limits on the radio luminosity from exoplanets; the limits presented in this paper are given by the red stars. The references
in the legend are: Bas00 (Bastian et al. 2000); Laz04 (Lazio et al. 2004); Geo07 (George & Stevens 2007); Smi09 (Smith et al. 2009);
Laz10 (Lazio et al. 2010); Str12 (Stroe et al. 2012); Hal13 (Hallinan et al. 2013); Lec13 (Lecavelier des Etangs et al. 2013); Lyn17 (Lynch
et al. 2017); OGo18 (O'Gorman et al. 2018).
direction-dependent calibration on strong sources identified
within the primary beam FWHM. The solutions from this
calibration are used to fit to a global ionospheric model.
Using this model, a set of gain corrections is generated for
the image facets. These gain corrections are applied during
a final round of imaging and de-convolution of the target
field.
We calibrated each observing epoch independently us-
ing SPAM and then median-stacked the final total intensity
images to produce a deep image. We achieved an rms of
∼2.0 mJy in the individual, 8 hour images, and an rms of
1.5 mJy in the deep 24-hour image. We did not detect any
significant emission at the location of the planet to a 3σ
level in any of the these images; the 3σ limit from our deep
image and associated luminosity limit are reported in Table
(2). Our new limit is about an order of magnitude better
than the limit placed by the MWA observations in section
(5.1). With these more sensitive observations we can more
confidently say that if V830 Tau b had produced radio emis-
sion beamed into our line of sight at the levels predicted by
our models, including their uncertainty, we would have made
a significant detection (>10σ) of this emission.
6 CONCLUSIONS
We presented predictions for the radio emission properties
for the currently known population of exoplanets orbiting
dwarf type stars. We report the predicted maximum emis-
sion frequencies and the associated radio flux densities for
this population of sources. Similar to previous modelling ef-
forts of the comprehensive population of known exoplanets,
we find that the expected radio flux density decreases with
the associated maximum emission frequency. This trend
highlights a deficient number of Jupiter or larger sized plan-
ets orbiting their host stars at small radii. For most objects
the magnetic RBL predicts much brighter radio emission
than the kinetic RBL, however in a few cases the exoplanet
is located at a sufficient distance away from its host star so
the kinetic power dissipated dominates the star–planet inter-
action. The brightest emission is predicted for Hot Jupiters
orbiting young (t ≤2.5 Gyr) stars.
We also report upper limits from two observational ef-
forts to detect radio emission from exoplanets. Using a recent
all-sky circular polarisation survey from the MWA, we place
the first upper limits on 169 – 230 MHz emission from exo-
planets. These limits are comparable to previous limits in the
literature at other frequencies. We also carried out a targeted
observational campaign of V830 Tau b using the GMRT.
This source is of particular interest because of the predicted
bright radio emission. We place the first low-frequency radio
limit on emission from this source.
Not much can be gleamed from these upper limits,
as the uncertainties in the predicted radio flux densities
are large, and many other factors could explain the non-
detections. The large uncertainty associated with the max-
imum emission frequency makes it such that the range of
possible emission frequencies is larger than the bandwidth
of current instruments. Better estimates of the exoplanet
masses could alleviate this problem. Additionally, the scal-
ing relation of Christensen et al. (2009) appears consistent
with magnetic field measurement from Solar System plan-
ets to fully convective stars, yet it is unconstrained over the
mass gap occupied by massive exoplanets and rapidly ro-
tating brown dwarfs. CMI emission has now been detected
from the coolest brown dwarf objects (L and T dwarfs),
providing measurements for magnetic field strengths of ob-
MNRAS 000, 1–14 (2018)
102103Frequency (MHz)1020102110221023102410251026102710281029Luminosity (erg s−1)This workMurphy 2015Sirothia 201447 Uma (Bas00)51 Peg (Bas00)55 Cnc (Bas00)70 Vir (Bas00, Laz04)HAT-P-11 (Lec13)HD 104985 (Laz04)HD 108874 (Laz04)HD 114762 (Bas00)HD 128311 (Geo07)HD 189733 (Smi09)HD 80606 (Laz10)K2-33 (Lyn17)WASP-17 (Lyn17)beta Gem (OGo18)beta Umi (OGo18)eps Eri b (Geo07)iota Dra (OGo18)tau Boo b (Laz04, Str12, Hal13)ups And (Bas00) jects with masses between that of Jupiter and low mass stars
(Kao et al. 2016). These magnetic field strengths tentatively
suggest a deviation from the scaling relation of Christensen
et al. (2009). Future radio studies of such objects could place
better constraints on this scaling relation and allow for bet-
ter predictions of the maximum emission frequencies for Hot
Jupiters. Further, much could be gained by pushing down
limits at the lowest observable frequencies since we know
Jupiter can produce emission at these frequencies (Zarka
2007) and eliminates the uncertainty as to whether planets
can produce higher frequency emission.
For the majority of exoplanets in our sample, the mag-
netic RBL predicts much brighter radio emission than the
kinetic RBL. However, as noted in the literature, saturation
of magnetospheric convection in Hot Jupiter atmospheres
could cause these systems to be unable to dissipate the to-
tal incident magnetic energy from the stellar wind (Jardine
& Collier Cameron 2008; Nichols & Milan 2016). If this is
true, than the magnetic RBL significantly overestimates the
expected flux densities from these systems; Nichols & Mi-
lan (2016) predicts flux densities on the order of 1 mJy in
the case of convection saturation. Even worse still, Weber
et al. (2017) suggests that these massive planets will have
extended ionospheres with plasma densities large enough
to prevent the propagation of CMI emission. Counter to
that point, however, Yadav & Thorngren (2017) note that
the luminosity relations used to calculate the magnetic field
strengths for Hot Jupiter systems do not take into account
that most of these objects are inflated and could have much
stronger magnetic field strengths. This might alleviate the
issue presented by Weber et al. (2017).
Lastly, the beaming of the emission could also explain
the non-detections. Only a small percentage of the exoplanet
orbits were covered by either the GMRT or MWA observa-
tions reported here. Given this, we cannot rule out that there
is an optimal orbital phase within which we would have de-
tected the expected emission. Observations that cover the
full orbit of young Hot Jupiter systems would be able to
rule out this scenario.
The increased sensitivity expected through future up-
grades to current low-frequency telescopes and ultimately
the Square Kilometre Array (Lazio et al. 2009) will extend
sensitivity limits into a flux density and frequency regime
where many more exoplanets are predicted to produce ob-
servable levels of radio emission. The greater number of po-
tentially observable exoplanets will help to alleviate some of
the issues associated with these non-detection and increases
the likelihood of a radio detection.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This scientific work makes use of the Murchison Radio-
astronomy Observatory, operated by CSIRO. We acknowl-
edge the Wajarri Yamatji people as the traditional owners of
the Observatory site. Support for the operation of the MWA
is provided by the Australian Government (NCRIS), under
a contract to Curtin University administered by Astronomy
Australia Limited. We acknowledge the Pawsey Supercom-
puting Centre which is supported by the Western Australian
and Australian Governments. This research was conducted
by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for
MNRAS 000, 1–14 (2018)
Radio detectability of exoplanets
13
All-sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO), through project number
CE110001020. We thank the staff of the GMRT that made
these observations possible. GMRT is run by the National
Centre for Radio Astrophysics of the Tata Institute of Fun-
damental Research. DK was supported by NSF grant AST-
1412421. T.M. acknowledges the support of the Australian
Research Council through grant FT150100099. This research
has made use of the NASA Exoplanet Archive, which is op-
erated by the California Institute of Technology, under con-
tract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administra-
tion under the Exoplanet Exploration Program. The authors
thank the anonymous referee for providing helpful comments
on the original version of this paper.
REFERENCES
Alvarado-G´omez J. D., Hussain G. A. J., Cohen O., Drake J. J.,
Garraffo C., Grunhut J., Gombosi T. I., 2016a, A&A, 588,
A28
Alvarado-G´omez J. D., Hussain G. A. J., Cohen O., Drake J. J.,
Garraffo C., Grunhut J., Gombosi T. I., 2016b, A&A, 594,
A95
Ayres T. R., 1997, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 1641
Bastian T. S., Dulk G. A., Leblanc Y., 2000, ApJ, 545, 1058
Bouvier J., Matt S. P., Mohanty S., Scholz A., Stassun K. G.,
Zanni C., 2014, Protostars and Planets VI, pp 433–450
Burrows A., Hubbard W. B., Lunine J. I., Liebert J., 2001, Re-
views of Modern Physics, 73, 719
Christensen U. R., 2010, Space Sci. Rev., 152, 565
Christensen U. R., Aubert J., 2006, Geophysical Journal Interna-
tional, 166, 97
Christensen U. R., Holzwarth V., Reiners A., 2009, Nature, 457,
167
Condon J. J., Cotton W. D., Greisen E. W., Yin Q. F., Perley
R. A., Taylor G. B., Broderick J. J., 1998, AJ, 115, 1693
Cotton W. D., 2008, PASP, 120, 439
Desch M. D., Kaiser M. L., 1984, Nature, 310, 755
Donati J. F., et al., 2016, Nature, 534, 662
Driscoll P., Olson P., 2011, Icarus, 213, 12
Duric N., 2004, Advanced astrophysics
Farrell W. M., Desch M. D., Zarka P., 1999, J. Geophys. Res.,
104, 14025
Folsom C. P., et al., 2016, MNRAS, 457, 580
Fujii Y., Spiegel D. S., Mroczkowski T., Nordhaus J., Zimmerman
N. T., Parsons A. R., Mirbabayi M., Madhusudhan N., 2016,
ApJ, 820, 122
George S. J., Stevens I. R., 2007, MNRAS, 382, 455
Grankin K. N., 2016, Astronomy Letters, 42, 314
Greisen E. W., 2003, in Heck A., ed., Astrophysics and Space
Science Library Vol. 285, Information Handling in Astronomy
- Historical Vistas. p. 109, doi:10.1007/0-306-48080-8 7
Griessmeier J.-M., Motschmann U., Mann G., Rucker H. O., 2005,
A&A, 437, 717
Griessmeier J.-M., Preusse S., Khodachenko M., Motschmann U.,
Mann G., Rucker H. O., 2007a, Planet. Space Sci., 55, 618
Griessmeier J.-M., Zarka P., Spreeuw H., 2007b, A&A, 475, 359
Griessmeier J.-M., Zarka P., Girard J. N., 2011, Radio Science, 46,
RS0F09
Gupta Y., et al., 2017, 113, 707
Gurnett D. A., et al., 2002, Nature, 415, 985
Haisch Jr. K. E., Lada E. A., Lada C. J., 2000, AJ, 120, 1396
Halbwachs J. L., 1987, A&A, 183, 234
Hallinan G., Sirothia S. K., Antonova A., Ishwara-Chandra C. H.,
Bourke S., Doyle J. G., Hartman J., Golden A., 2013, ApJ,
762, 34
Hess S. L. G., Zarka P., 2011, A&A, 531, A29
14
C. R. Lynch et al.
Hilgers A., 1992, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 237
Hurley-Walker N., et al., 2017, MNRAS, 464, 1146
Intema H. T., van der Tol S., Cotton W. D., Cohen A. S., van
Yadav R. K., Thorngren D. P., 2017, ApJ, 849, L12
Zarka P., 2007, Planet. Space Sci., 55, 598
Zarka P., Treumann R. A., Ryabov B. P., Ryabov V. B., 2001,
Bemmel I. M., Rottgering H. J. A., 2009, A&A, 501, 1185
Ap&SS, 277, 293
Intema H. T., Jagannathan P., Mooley K. P., Frail D. A., 2017,
Zarka P., Cecconi B., Kurth W. S., 2004, Journal of Geophysical
A&A, 598, A78
Jardine M., Collier Cameron A., 2008, A&A, 490, 843
Jiang I.-G., Ip W.-H., Yeh L.-C., 2003, ApJ, 582, 449
Kao M. M., Hallinan G., Pineda J. S., Escala I., Burgasser A.,
Bourke S., Stevenson D., 2016, ApJ, 818, 24
Karim M. T., et al., 2016, AJ, 152, 198
Kettenis M., van Langevelde H. J., Reynolds C., Cotton B., 2006,
in Gabriel C., Arviset C., Ponz D., Enrique S., eds, Astronom-
ical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 351, Astro-
nomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XV. p. 497
Lazio W. T. J., Farrell W. M., Dietrick J., Greenlees E., Hogan
E., Jones C., Hennig L. A., 2004, ApJ, 612, 511
Lazio J., et al., 2009, in astro2010: The Astronomy and Astro-
physics Decadal Survey. (arXiv:0903.0873)
Lazio T. J. W., Shankland P. D., Farrell W. M., Blank D. L.,
2010, AJ, 140, 1929
Le Queau D., Pellat R., Roux A., 1985, Annales Geophysicae, 3,
273
Lecavelier des Etangs A., Sirothia S. K., Gopal-Krishna Zarka P.,
2013, A&A, 552, A65
Lenc E., et al., 2017, Publ. Astron. Soc. Australia, 34, e040
Lenc E., Murphy T., Lynch C. R., Kaplan D. L., Zhang S. N.,
2018 submitted
Lynch C. R., Murphy T., Kaplan D. L., Ireland M., Bell M. E.,
2017, MNRAS, 467, 3447
Mead G. D., Beard D. B., 1964, J. Geophys. Res., 69, 1169
Murphy T., et al., 2015, MNRAS, 446, 2560
Newkirk Jr. G., 1980, in Pepin R. O., Eddy J. A., Merrill R. B.,
eds, The Ancient Sun: Fossil Record in the Earth, Moon and
Meteorites. pp 293–320
Nichols J. D., 2011, MNRAS, 414, 2125
Nichols J. D., 2012, MNRAS, 427, L75
Nichols J. D., Milan S. E., 2016, MNRAS, 461, 2353
O'Gorman E., Coughlan C. P., Vlemmings W., Varenius
E., Sirothia S., Ray T. P., Olofsson H., 2018, preprint,
(arXiv:1801.07753)
Parker E. N., 1958, ApJ, 128, 664
Patzold M., Rauer H., 2002, ApJ, 568, L117
Perryman M., 2011, The Exoplanet Handbook
Reiners A., Christensen U. R., 2010, A&A, 522, A13
Scaife A. M. M., Heald G. H., 2012, MNRAS, 423, L30
Schneider J., Dedieu C., Le Sidaner P., Savalle R., Zolotukhin I.,
2011, A&A, 532, A79
Sirothia S. K., Lecavelier des Etangs A., Gopal-Krishna Kantharia
N. G., Ishwar-Chandra C. H., 2014, A&A, 562, A108
Smith A. M. S., Collier Cameron A., Greaves J., Jardine M.,
Langston G., Backer D., 2009, MNRAS, 395, 335
Stevens I. R., 2005, MNRAS, 356, 1053
Stroe A., Snellen I. A. G., Rottgering H. J. A., 2012, A&A, 546,
A116
Tingay S. J., et al., 2013, Publ. Astron. Soc. Australia, 30, e007
Treumann R. A., 2006, A&ARv, 13, 229
Vidotto A. A., Donati J.-F., 2017, A&A, 602, A39
Vidotto A. A., Opher M., Jatenco-Pereira V., Gombosi T. I., 2010,
ApJ, 720, 1262
Vidotto A. A., et al., 2014, MNRAS, 441, 2361
Weber C., et al., 2017, MNRAS, 469, 3505
Winglee R. M., Dulk G. A., Bastian T. S., 1986, ApJ, 309, L59
Wood B. E., Muller H.-R., Zank G. P., Linsky J. L., 2002, ApJ,
574, 412
Wood B. E., Muller H.-R., Zank G. P., Linsky J. L., Redfield S.,
2005, ApJ, 628, L143
Wu C. S., Lee L. C., 1979, ApJ, 230, 621
Research (Space Physics), 109, A09S15
van Haarlem M. P., et al., 2013, A&A, 556, A2
This paper has been typeset from a TEX/LATEX file prepared by
the author.
MNRAS 000, 1–14 (2018)
|
1709.09533 | 2 | 1709 | 2017-11-18T06:36:50 | Dynamical evolution of near-Earth asteroid 1991 VG | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | The discovery of 1991 VG on 1991 November 6 attracted an unprecedented amount of attention as it was the first near-Earth object (NEO) ever found on an Earth-like orbit. At that time, it was considered by some as the first representative of a new dynamical class of asteroids, while others argued that an artificial (terrestrial or extraterrestrial) origin was more likely. Over a quarter of a century later, this peculiar NEO has been recently recovered and the new data may help in confirming or ruling out early theories about its origin. Here, we use the latest data to perform an independent assessment of its current dynamical status and short-term orbital evolution. Extensive N-body simulations show that its orbit is chaotic on time-scales longer than a few decades. We confirm that 1991 VG was briefly captured by Earth's gravity as a minimoon during its previous fly-by in 1991-1992; although it has been a recurrent transient co-orbital of the horseshoe type in the past and it will return as such in the future, it is not a present-day co-orbital companion of the Earth. A realistic NEO orbital model predicts that objects like 1991 VG must exist and, consistently, we have found three other NEOs --2001 GP2, 2008 UA202 and 2014 WA366-- which are dynamically similar to 1991 VG. All this evidence confirms that there is no compelling reason to believe that 1991 VG is not natural. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph |
MNRAS 000, 1–10 (2017)
Preprint 21 November 2017
Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0
Dynamical evolution of near-Earth asteroid 1991 VG
C. de la Fuente Marcos⋆ and R. de la Fuente Marcos
Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
Accepted 2017 September 26. Received 2017 September 26; in original form 2017 August 4
ABSTRACT
The discovery of 1991 VG on 1991 November 6 attracted an unprecedented amount of atten-
tion as it was the first near-Earth object (NEO) ever found on an Earth-like orbit. At that time,
it was considered by some as the first representative of a new dynamical class of asteroids,
while others argued that an artificial (terrestrial or extraterrestrial) origin was more likely.
Over a quarter of a century later, this peculiar NEO has been recently recovered and the new
data may help in confirming or ruling out early theories about its origin. Here, we use the lat-
est data to perform an independent assessment of its current dynamical status and short-term
orbital evolution. Extensive N-body simulations show that its orbit is chaotic on time-scales
longer than a few decades. We confirm that 1991 VG was briefly captured by Earth's gravity
as a minimoon during its previous fly-by in 1991–1992; although it has been a recurrent tran-
sient co-orbital of the horseshoe type in the past and it will return as such in the future, it is
not a present-day co-orbital companion of the Earth. A realistic NEO orbital model predicts
that objects like 1991 VG must exist and, consistently, we have found three other NEOs -
2001 GP2, 2008 UA202 and 2014 WA366- which are dynamically similar to 1991 VG. All this
evidence confirms that there is no compelling reason to believe that 1991 VG is not natural.
Key words: methods: numerical – celestial mechanics – minor planets, asteroids: general –
minor planets, asteroids: individual: 1991 VG – planets and satellites: individual: Earth.
1 INTRODUCTION
Very few near-Earth objects (NEOs) as small as 1991 VG (about
10 m) have given rise to so much controversy and imaginative con-
jectures. Asteroid 1991 VG was the first NEO ever discovered mov-
ing in an orbit that is similar to that of the Earth (Scotti & Marsden
1991). This element of novelty led to a stimulating debate on how
best to interpret the new finding. On the one hand, it could be the
first member of a new orbital class of NEOs (e.g. Rabinowitz et al.
1993); on the other, it could be a relic of space exploration (e.g.
Scotti & Marsden 1991; Steel 1995b).
In addition to the primary debate on the possible character -
natural versus artificial- of 1991 VG, a lively discussion resulted
in multiple theories about its most plausible origin; the main aster-
oid belt (e.g. Brasser & Wiegert 2008), lunar ejecta (e.g. Tancredi
1997), a returning spacecraft (e.g. Steel 1995b) or space debris
(e.g. Scotti & Marsden 1991), and being an extraterrestrial artefact
(e.g. Steel 1995a), were all argued in favour and against as possi-
ble provenances for this object. After being last observed in 1992
April, 1991 VG has spent over a quarter of a century at small solar
elongation angles, out of reach of ground-based telescopes.
Now, this peculiar minor body has been recovered (Hainaut,
Koschny & Micheli 2017)1 and the new data may help in confirm-
ing or ruling out early speculative theories about its origin. Here, we
⋆ E-mail: [email protected]
1 http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/mpec/K17/K17L02.html
c(cid:13) 2017 The Authors
use the latest data available on 1991 VG to study its past, present
and future orbital evolution in an attempt to understand its origin
and current dynamical status. This paper is organized as follows. In
Section 2, we present historical information, current data, and the
various theories proposed to explain the origin of 1991 VG. Details
of our numerical model and 1991 VG's orbital evolution are pre-
sented and discussed in Section 3. In Section 4, we show that even
if 1991 VG is certainly unusual, other known NEOs move in similar
orbits and orbital models predict that such objects must exist nat-
urally. Arguments against 1991 VG being a relic of alien or even
human space exploration are presented in Section 5. Our results are
discussed in Section 6. Section 7 summarizes our conclusions.
2 ASTEROID 1991 VG: DATA AND THEORIES
Asteroid 1991 VG was discovered on 1991 November 6 by J. V.
Scotti observing with the Spacewatch 0.91-m telescope at Steward
Observatory on Kitt Peak at an apparent visual magnitude of 20.7,
nearly 0.022 au from the Earth (Scotti & Marsden 1991). The rather
Earth-like orbit determination initially led to suspect that the object
was of artificial origin, i.e. returning space debris, perhaps a Saturn
S-IVB third stage. It experienced a close encounter with our planet
at nearly 0.0031 au on 1991 December 5 and with the Moon at
0.0025 au on the following day, but it was not detected by radar at
NASA's Goldstone Deep Space Network on December 12 (Scotti
et al. 1991).
2
C. de la Fuente Marcos and R. de la Fuente Marcos
Table 1. Heliocentric Keplerian orbital elements and 1σ uncertainties of
1991 VG at epoch JD 2458000.5 that corresponds to 00:00:00.000 TDB,
Barycentric Dynamical Time, on 2017 September 4 (J2000.0 ecliptic and
equinox. Source: JPL's Small-Body Database.)
Orbital parameter
Value±uncertainty (1σ)
Semimajor axis, a (au)
Eccentricity, e
Inclination, i (◦)
=
Longitude of the ascending node, Ω (◦) =
Argument of perihelion, ω (◦)
=
Mean anomaly, M (◦)
Perihelion, q (au)
Aphelion, Q (au)
Absolute magnitude, H (mag)
=
= 1.0255840443±0.0000000006
= 0.049746422±0.000000010
1.437055±0.000004
73.26393±0.00007
23.96147±0.00007
246.83514±0.00002
= 0.974564908±0.000000010
= 1.0766031805±0.0000000006
=
28.5
After being last imaged in 1992 April, 1991 VG remained un-
observed until it was recovered on 2017 May 30 by Hainaut et
al. (2017) observing with the Very Large Telescope (8.2-m) from
Cerro Paranal at a magnitude of 25. The new orbit determination
(see Table 1) is based on 70 observations that span a data-arc of
9 339 d or 25.57 yr and shows that 1991 VG is an Apollo as-
teroid following a somewhat Earth-like orbit -semimajor axis,
a=1.026 au, eccentricity, e=0.04975, and inclination, i=1.◦44-
with a minimum orbit intersection distance (MOID) with the Earth
of 0.0053 au.
As for the possible origin of 1991 VG and based only on its
orbital elements, Scotti & Marsden (1991) suggested immediately
that it might be a returning spacecraft. West et al. (1991) pointed
out that its light curve might be compatible with that of a rapidly
rotating satellite -probably tumbling- with highly reflective side
panels, further supporting the theory that 1991 VG could be an
artificial object. Although an artificial origin was proposed first,
T. Gehrels pointed out that if 1991 VG was natural, it might be a
representative of a new orbital class of objects, the Arjunas; an un-
official dynamical group of small NEOs following approximately
Earth-like orbits which could be secondary fragments of asteroids
that were originally part of the main belt and left their formation re-
gion under the effect of Jupiter's gravity (Cowen 1993; Rabinowitz
et al. 1993; Gladman, Michel & Froeschlé 2000).
In his analysis of terrestrial impact probabilities, Steel (1995b)
assumed that 1991 VG was a returned spacecraft. An artificial na-
ture for 1991 VG was discussed in detail by Steel (1995a), con-
cluding that it was a robust candidate alien artefact (inert or under
control); this conclusion was contested by Weiler (1996). The con-
troversy on a possible alien origin for 1991 VG was continued by
Steel (1998) and Weiler (1998) to conclude that either the detection
of 1991 VG was a statistical fluke (unusual NEO or space debris of
terrestrial origin) or a very large number of alien probes are follow-
ing heliocentric orbits.
Tancredi (1997) reviewed all the available evidence to con-
clude that 1991 VG could be a piece of lunar ejecta, the result of a
relatively large impact. Tatum (1997) favoured a natural origin for
1991 VG to state that any asteroid moving in an Earth-like orbit
with semimajor axis in the range 0.9943–1.0057 au will inevitably
collide with our planet, i.e. observed NEOs in such paths must be
relatively recent arrivals. Brasser & Wiegert (2008) re-examined
the topic of the origin of 1991 VG and argued that it had to have its
origin on a low-inclination Amor- or Apollo-class object.
Here and in order to identify the most Earth-like orbits among
those of known NEOs, we have used the D-criteria of Southworth
& Hawkins (1963), DSH, Lindblad & Southworth (1971), DLS (in
the form of equation 1 in Lindblad 1994 or equation 1 in Foglia &
Masi 2004), Drummond (1981), DD, and the DR from Valsecchi,
Jopek & Froeschlé (1999) to search the known NEOs for objects
that could be dynamically similar to our planet, considering the or-
bital elements of the Earth for the epoch JDTDB 2458000.5 (see
below) that is the standard time reference used throughout this re-
search. The actual values are: semimajor axis, a = 0.999215960 au,
eccentricity, e = 0.017237361, inclination, i = 0.◦000524177, lon-
gitude of the ascending node, Ω = 230.◦950190495, and argument
of perihelion, ω = 233.◦858793714. The list of NEOs has been re-
trieved from JPL's Solar System Dynamics Group (SSDG) Small-
Body Database (SBDB).2
Considering the currently available data on NEOs, the orbit of
1991 VG is neither the (overall) most Earth-like known -the cur-
rent record holder is 2006 RH120 (Bressi et al. 2008a; Kwiatkowski
et al. 2009) which has the lowest values of the D-criteria, but it has
not been observed since 2007 June 22- nor the one with the or-
bital period closest to one Earth year -which is 2014 OL339 with
a=0.9992 au or an orbital period of 364.83227±0.00002 d (Vadu-
vescu et al. 2014, 2015; de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Mar-
cos 2014; Holmes et al. 2015)- nor the least eccentric -which
is 2002 AA29 with e=0.01296 (Connors et al. 2002; Smalley et
al. 2002), followed by 2003 YN107 with e=0.01395 (McNaught
et al. 2003; Connors et al. 2004)- nor the one with the lowest
inclination -which is probably 2009 BD with i=0.◦38 (Buzzi et
al. 2009; Micheli, Tholen & Elliott 2012), followed by 2013 BS45
with i=0.◦77 (Bressi, Scotti & Hug 2013; de la Fuente Marcos &
de la Fuente Marcos 2013). Other NEOs with very Earth-like or-
bits are 2006 JY26 (McGaha et al. 2006; Brasser & Wiegert 2008;
de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos 2013) and 2008 KT
(Gilmore et al. 2008; de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos
2013). In summary and within the context of the known NEOs, al-
though certainly unusual, the orbital properties of 1991 VG are not
as remarkable as initially thought. On a more technical side, the or-
bit determinations of 2006 RH120 and 2009 BD required the inclu-
sion of non-gravitational accelerations (radiation-pressure related)
in order to reproduce the available astrometry (see e.g. Micheli et
al. 2012). The orbital solution of 1991 VG (see Table 1) was com-
puted without using any non-gravitational forces and reproduces
the observations used in the fitting.
3 INTEGRATIONS AND ORBITAL EVOLUTION
Understanding the origin and current dynamical status of 1991 VG
demands a detailed study of its past, present and future orbital evo-
lution. A careful statistical analysis of the behaviour over time of its
orbital elements and other relevant parameters using a sufficiently
large set of N-body simulations, including the uncertainties asso-
ciated with the orbit determination in a consistent manner, should
produce reasonably robust conclusions.
In this section, we use a publicly available direct N-body
code3 originally written by Aarseth (2003) that implements a fourth
order version of the Hermite scheme described by Makino (1991).
The suitability of this software for Solar system studies has been
successfully and extensively tested (see de la Fuente Marcos & de
2 http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi
3 http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~sverre/web/pages/nbody.htm
MNRAS 000, 1–10 (2017)
la Fuente Marcos 2012). Consistent with the new data on 1991 VG
(Hainaut et al. 2017), non-gravitational forces have been excluded
from the calculations; the effects of solar radiation pressure have
been found to be negligible in the calculation of the orbit in Table 1
and for an average value for the Yarkovsky drift of 10−9 au yr−1 (see
e.g. Nugent et al. 2012), the time-scale to escape the orbital neigh-
bourhood of the Earth is about 12 Myr, which is some orders of
magnitude longer than the time intervals discussed in this research.
Our calculations make use of the physical model described by
de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos (2012) and of initial
conditions -positions and velocities in the barycentre of the So-
lar system for the various bodies involved, including 1991 VG-
provided by JPL's horizons4 (Giorgini et al. 1996; Standish 1998;
Giorgini & Yeomans 1999; Giorgini, Chodas & Yeomans 2001;
Giorgini 2011, 2015) at epoch JD 2458000.5 (2017-September-
04.0 TDB, Barycentric Dynamical Time), which is the t = 0 instant
in our figures.
Fig. 1 shows the evolution backwards and forward in time of
several orbital elements and other relevant parameters of 1991 VG
using initial conditions compatible with the nominal orbit in Ta-
ble 1. The time interval displayed (10 kyr) is consistent with the
analysis of its dynamical lifetime carried out by Brasser & Wiegert
(2008). Fig. 1, top panel (geocentric distance), shows that this NEO
experiences recurrent close encounters with our planet well within
the Hill radius, which is 0.0098 au. The Hill radius of the Earth
is the maximum orbital distance of an object (natural or artificial)
to remain gravitationally bound to our planet, i.e. to be a satellite.
When inside the Hill sphere, the Earth's attraction dominates that
of the Sun even for objects with a positive value of the geocentric
energy, i.e. unbound passing objects. In order to be captured as a
satellite of our planet, the geocentric energy of the object must be
negative (Carusi & Valsecchi 1979). This simple criterion does not
include any constraint on the duration of the capture event; Rick-
man & Malmort (1981) recommended the addition of an additional
restriction that the object completes at least one revolution around
our planet while its geocentric energy is still negative (see Section
5 for a more detailed analysis applied to 1991 VG).
Given its low eccentricity, 1991 VG cannot undergo close en-
counters with major bodies other than the Earth–Moon system. As
the orbit of 1991 VG is somewhat Earth-like, these are often low-
velocity encounters (as low as 0.9 km s−1). Such fly-bys can be very
effective in perturbing an orbit even if the close approaches are rel-
atively distant, but in this case we observe very frequent (every few
decades) close fly-bys. Under such conditions, one may expect a
very chaotic evolution as confirmed by the other panels in Fig. 1.
Although very chaotic orbits present great challenges in terms of re-
constructing the past dynamical evolution of the affected objects or
making reliable predictions about their future behaviour, Wiegert,
Innanen & Mikkola (1998) have shown that it is still possible to ar-
rive to scientifically robust conclusions if a proper analysis is per-
formed. On the other hand, low-velocity encounters well within the
Hill radius can lead to temporary capture events (see Section 5).
Fig. 1, second to top panel, shows the evolution of the value
of the so-called Kozai-Lidov parameter √1 − e2 cos i (Kozai 1962;
Lidov 1962) that measures the behaviour of the component of the
orbital angular momentum of the minor body perpendicular to the
ecliptic. The value of this parameter remains fairly constant over
the time interval studied; the dispersion is smaller than the one ob-
served for typical NEOs following Earth-like paths (see e.g. figs 3,
4 https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?horizons
MNRAS 000, 1–10 (2017)
Dynamical evolution of 1991 VG
3
Figure 1. Evolution of the values of the orbital elements and other rele-
vant parameters for the nominal orbit of 1991 VG in Table 1. The top panel
shows the geocentric distance; encounters at ranges well below the Hill ra-
dius of the Earth, 0.0098 au (also shown), are common. The Kozai-Lidov
parameter is shown in the second to top panel. The value of the resonant
angle is displayed in the third to top panel. The evolution of the orbital ele-
ments, semimajor axis, eccentricity, inclination and argument of perihelion
is shown in the fourth to top panel and the fourth, third and second to bottom
panels, respectively. The bottom panel shows the distance from the Sun to
the descending (thick line) and ascending nodes (dotted line); the aphelion
and perihelion distances of Venus, the Earth and Mars are indicated as well.
4
C. de la Fuente Marcos and R. de la Fuente Marcos
maximum, the value of the inclination reaches a local minimum and
vice versa. This explains why the value of the Kozai-Lidov parame-
ter (Fig. 1, second to top panel) remains relatively stable throughout
the integrations; this is also a sign that the Kozai-Lidov mechanism
(Kozai 1962; Lidov 1962) may be at work, at least partially. This
interpretation is confirmed in Fig. 1, second to bottom panel, as the
value of the argument of perihelion, ω, shows signs of libration (it
does not circulate) which is a typical side effect of the Kozai-Lidov
mechanism. Fig. 1, bottom panel, shows the evolution of the nodal
distances of 1991 VG; encounters with the Earth–Moon system are
only possible in the neighbourhood of the nodes and both nodes
tend to drift into the path of our planet in a chaotic manner.
The orbital evolution displayed in Fig. 1 gives a general idea of
the dynamical behaviour of 1991 VG, but it does not show the effect
of the uncertainties in the orbit determination (see Table 1). In order
to account for this critical piece of information, we use the Monte
Carlo using the Covariance Matrix (MCCM) method detailed in
section 3 of de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos (2015c) -
the covariance matrix to generate initial positions and velocities has
been obtained from JPL's horizons. Fig. 3 shows the results of the
evolution of 250 control orbits generated using the MCCM method.
These simulations confirm that the orbital evolution of 1991 VG is
chaotic on time-scales longer than a few decades.
4 UNUSUAL BUT NOT UNCOMMON
One of the arguments originally applied to reject a natural origin
for 1991 VG was that, in accordance with the evidence available
at that time, such a NEO was highly improbable, from an orbital
point of view. Brasser & Wiegert (2008) using numerical simula-
tions estimated that the probability of a NEO ever ending up on an
Earth-like orbit could be about 1:20 000. If we use the latest NEO
orbital model described by Granvik et al. (2013a,b) and Bottke et
al. (2014) and implemented in the form of a publicly available sur-
vey simulator,5 we obtain a probability of finding a NEO moving
in an orbit akin to that of 1991 VG of about 10−6 -the degree of
similarity between two orbits has been estimated as described be-
fore, using the D-criteria. As the previously mentioned NEO orbit
model only strictly applies to NEOs with H < 25 mag (in fact, the
single object predicted by the model has a magnitude of 24.24) and
1991 VG is smaller, it cannot be discarded that objects other than
1991 VG may be moving along similar paths.
In order to confirm or reject this plausible hypothesis, we have
used the D-criteria mentioned above to search the known NEOs
(data from JPL's SSDG SBDB as before) for objects dynamically
similar to 1991 VG. We apply these criteria using osculating Kep-
lerian orbital elements, not the customary proper orbital elements
(see e.g. Milani 1993, 1995; Milani & Kneževi´c 1994; Kneževi´c &
Milani 2000; Milani et al. 2014, 2017), because 1991 VG-like or-
bits are inherently chaotic on very short time-scales. Table 2 shows
the data of three other NEOs -2001 GP2 (McMillan et al. 2001),
2008 UA202 (Bressi et al. 2008b) and 2014 WA366 (Gibbs et al.
2014)- which are dynamically similar to 1991 VG (they have DLS
and DR < 0.05). Integrations analogous to those in Fig. 1 (not
shown) indicate that the evolution of these three NEOs (although
their orbit determinations are in need of significant improvement)
bears some resemblance to that of 1991 VG. Common features in-
clude relatively frequent close encounters with the Earth–Moon
5 http://neo.ssa.esa.int/neo-population
MNRAS 000, 1–10 (2017)
Figure 2. Variation of the relative mean longitude, λr, over time during the
most recent co-orbital episode of 1991 VG (top panel). The path followed
by 1991 VG during the time interval (−635, −350) yr (bottom panel) de-
scribes a horseshoe pattern when seen in a frame of reference centred at
the Sun and rotating with the Earth, projected on to the ecliptic plane. The
figure also shows the orbit of the Earth, its position at (1, 0) au, and the Sun
at (0, 0) au.
6 and 9, B-panels, in de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos
2016b). The variation of the relative mean longitude of 1991 VG
or difference between the mean longitude of the object and that
of the Earth, λr (see e.g. Murray & Dermott 1999), is shown in
Fig. 1, third to top panel. When λr changes freely in the interval
(0, 360)◦-i.e. λr circulates- 1991 VG is not subjected to the 1:1
mean-motion resonance with our planet. If the value of λr oscil-
lates or librates -about 0◦ (quasi-satellite), ±60◦ (Trojan) or 180◦
(horseshoe)- then the orbital periods of 1991 VG and the Earth
are virtually the same and we speak of a co-orbital companion to
our planet. Fig. 1, third to top panel, shows that 1991 VG has been
a recurrent transient co-orbital of the horseshoe type in the past and
it will return as such in the future, however, it is not a present-day
co-orbital companion of the Earth. Fig. 2 shows the most recent
co-orbital episode of 1991 VG in further detail; the variation of the
relative mean longitude indicates that 1991 VG followed a horse-
shoe path for about 300 yr.
Fig. 1, fourth to top panel, shows the evolution of the value
of the semimajor axis of 1991 VG. Earth's co-orbital region goes
from ∼0.994 au to ∼1.006 au, or a range in orbital periods of 362–
368 d, and the figure shows that 1991 VG only enters this zone
for relatively brief periods of time although it remains in its neigh-
bourhood during the entire integration. Fig. 1, fourth and third to
bottom panels, shows how the eccentricity and the inclination, re-
spectively, change over time. Although in both cases the evolution
is very irregular, there is some weak coupling between both orbital
elements and in some cases, when the eccentricity reaches a local
Dynamical evolution of 1991 VG
5
they have relatively high values of the impact probability, their es-
timated diameters are smaller than 20 m. In the improbable event of
an impact, its effects would be local, not too different from those of
the Chelyabinsk event or some other recent minor impacts (see e.g.
Brown et al. 2013; Popova et al. 2013; de la Fuente Marcos & de la
Fuente Marcos 2015b; de la Fuente Marcos, de la Fuente Marcos &
Mialle 2016); however, an object like 2008 UA202 probably would
break up in the Earth's atmosphere and few fragments, if any, will
hit the ground (or the ocean).
5 NATURAL OR ARTIFICIAL?
Some of the orbital properties of 1991 VG have been used to argue
in favour or against a natural or artificial origin for this object. A
very unusual dynamical feature that was pointed out by Tancredi
(1997) was the fact that 1991 VG experienced a temporary satel-
lite capture by the Earth during its 1991–1992 fly-by; such satellite
capture showed a recurrent pattern.
The backward evolution of the new orbit determination fully
confirms the analysis made by Tancredi (1997). Fig. 4, top panel,
shows that the Keplerian geocentric energy of 1991 VG (relative
binding energy) became negative during the encounter and also that
1991 VG completed an entire revolution around our planet (bottom
panel). Therefore, it might have matched both criteria (see above,
Carusi & Valsecchi 1979; Rickman & Malmort 1981) to be con-
sidered a bona fide satellite or, perhaps more properly, a minimoon
of the Earth; using the terminology in Fedorets, Granvik & Jedicke
(2017) we may speak of a temporarily captured orbiter. However,
the relative binding energy was not negative for the full length of
the loop around our planet pictured in Fig. 4, bottom panel. As the
loop followed by 1991 VG with respect to the Earth was travelled
in the clockwise sense, this event may be regarded as the first ever
documented retrograde capture of a satellite by our planet, even if
it had a duration of about 28 d. Fig. 4, top panel, also shows that
this unusual phenomenon is recurrent in the case of 1991 VG. But,
if there are other objects moving in 1991 VG-like orbits, how often
do they become temporary satellites of the Earth?
Figs 5 and 6 show the results of 106 numerical experiments
in which a virtual object moving in a 1991 VG-like orbit -orbital
elements assumed to be uniformly distributed in the volume of or-
bital parameter space defined by a ∈ (0.95, 1.05) au, e ∈ (0.0, 0.1),
i ∈ (0, 3)◦, Ω ∈ (0, 360)◦, ω ∈ (0, 360)◦, and the time of perihe-
lion passage τq ∈ (2458000.5, 2458365.75) JD- undergoes a fly-
by with our planet. The region chosen encloses the orbit solutions
of 1991 VG, 2001 GP2, 2008 UA202 and 2014 WA366, and those
of other NEOs cited earlier in this paper as well. We did not use
the NEO orbit model mentioned before to generate the synthetic
orbits because we wanted to survey the relevant volume of orbital
parameter space in full detail so our results could be applied to
both natural and artificial objects. The evolution of the virtual ob-
jects was followed just for one year of simulated time to minimize
the impact of orbital chaos and resonant returns (see e.g. Milani,
Chesley & Valsecchi 1999) on our conclusions. This short time in-
terval is fully justified because our previous analyses show that,
after experiencing a close fly-by with the Earth, an object moving
in a 1991 VG-like orbit most likely jumps into another 1991 VG-
like orbit. These experiments have been carried out with the same
software, physical model and relevant initial conditions used in our
previous integrations.
Our calculations show that the probability of becoming a tem-
porary (for any length of time) satellite of our planet for members of
Figure 3. Evolution of the dispersions of the values of the orbital elements
of 1991 VG for 250 control orbits: semimajor axis (top panel), eccentricity
(second to top panel), inclination (middle panel), longitude of the ascending
node (second to bottom panel), and argument of perihelion (bottom panel).
Average values are plotted as thick black curves and their ranges (1σ un-
certainties) as thin red curves.
system and very chaotic short-term evolution (all of them), small
values of their MOIDs, recurrent trapping by 1:1 mean-motion res-
onances with the Earth (particularly 2008 UA202), evolution tem-
porarily affected by the Kozai-Lidov effect and other consistent
properties. Asteroid 2008 UA202 is considered an easily retrievable
NEO (García Yárnoz, Sanchez & McInnes 2013).
NEOs 2001 GP2 and 2008 UA202 are included in the list of
asteroids that may be involved in potential future Earth impact
events maintained by JPL's Sentry System (Chamberlin et al. 2001;
Chodas 2015).6 Asteroid 2001 GP2 has a computed impact prob-
ability of 0.00021 for a possible impact in 2043–2107; asteroid
2008 UA202 is listed with an impact probability of 0.000081 for
a possible impact in 2050–2108. Their very similar range of years
for a most probable potential impact -i.e. they reach their closest
perigees at similar times even if their synodic periods are long-
suggest a high degree of dynamical coherence for these two ob-
jects even if their values of Ω and ω are very different. Although
6 https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/sentry/
MNRAS 000, 1–10 (2017)
6
C. de la Fuente Marcos and R. de la Fuente Marcos
Table 2. Orbital elements, orbital periods (P), perihelion -q = a (1 − e)- and aphelion -Q = a (1 + e)- distances, number of observations (n), data-arc
span, absolute magnitudes (H) and MOID with the Earth of NEOs following orbits similar to that of 1991 VG. The values of the various D-criteria (DSH, DLS,
DD and DR) with respect to 1991 VG are displayed as well. The minor bodies are sorted by ascending DLS and only those with DLS and DR < 0.05 are shown.
The orbits are referred to the epoch 2017 September 4 as before. Source: JPL's Small-Body Database.
Asteroid
a (au)
e
i (◦)
Ω (◦)
ω (◦)
P (yr) q (au) Q (au) n arc (d) H (mag) MOID (au) DSH
DLS
DD
DR
2014 WA366 1.03433 0.07150 1.55915 67.10073
2001 GP2
2008 UA202 1.03318 0.06857 0.26357 21.08289
287.63348 1.05
1.03779 0.07380 1.27825 196.80669 111.40484 1.06
300.90518 1.05
0.9604 1.1083 55 49
0.9612 1.1144 25 27
0.9623 1.1040 16 6
26.9
26.9
29.4
0.00732
0.00174
0.00022
0.0981 0.0261 0.1829 0.0276
0.1291 0.0277 0.2019 0.0201
0.1139 0.0304 0.1655 0.0132
this group of objects is 0.0036. The overall capture rate is roughly
similar to that found by Granvik et al. (2012). In our case, the prob-
ability of a capture for less than one month is 0.0023, for one to
two months is 0.0011, and for more than two months is 0.00021
(see Fig. 5). Captures for less than 7 d are less probable than cap-
tures for 7 to 14 d. Therefore, most objects temporarily captured as
Earth's transient bound companions spend less than one month in
this state and they do not complete one full revolution around our
planet. These results also indicate that as long as we have NEOs in
1991 VG-like orbits, they naturally tend to become temporary satel-
lites of our planet. However, captures for more than two months are
rather unusual and those lasting one year, exceedingly rare. This re-
sult is at odds with those in Granvik et al. (2012) and Fedorets et
al. (2017), but this is not surprising because our short integrations
are biased against producing temporarily captured orbiters due to
the comparatively small size of our synthetic sample -106 exper-
iments versus 1010 in Granvik et al. (2012)- and our choice of
initial conditions -e.g. their integrations start at 4–5 Hill's radii
from the Earth. Fedorets et al. (2017) show explicitly in their table
1 that 40 per cent of all captures should be temporarily captured
orbiters.
As objects moving in 1991 VG-like paths are being kicked
from one of these orbits into another, it is perfectly normal to ob-
serve recurrent but brief capture episodes as those discussed for
1991 VG. Such temporary captures are also observed during the
integrations of 2001 GP2, 2008 UA202 and 2014 WA366 although
they tend to be shorter in duration and less frequent. In addition, no
virtual object collided with the Earth during the calculations, which
strongly suggests that even if impact probabilities are theoretically
high for many of them, it is much more probable to be captured as
an ephemeral satellite of our planet than to become an actual im-
pactor; this conclusion is consistent with recent results by Clark et
al. (2016), but it is again at odds with results obtained by Granvik et
al. (2012) and Fedorets et al. (2017), who found that about one per
cent of their test particles impacted the Earth. This significant dis-
crepancy comes out of the facts pointed out before, comparatively
small size of our synthetic sample and different initial conditions.
Fig. 6 shows how the duration of the episode of temporary
capture as natural satellite of our planet depends on the initial val-
ues of the semimajor axis, eccentricity and inclination. The colours
(or grey scale) in the maps depend on the duration of the episode
in days as indicated in the associated colour box. NEOs moving in
1991 VG-like orbits of the Amor- or Apollo-class are more likely
to experience longer capture episodes. The probability of getting
captured decreases rapidly for objects with e > 0.05 and/or i > 1.◦5,
and the duration of the recorded episodes is shorter. It is impor-
tant to notice that one of these virtual objects might leave the as-
sumed initial volume of NEO orbital parameter space (see above)
in a time-scale of the order of 1 kyr as Fig. 3 shows. In addition,
the longest orbital period of a satellite of our planet is about 205 d
MNRAS 000, 1–10 (2017)
Figure 4. Keplerian geocentric energy of 1991 VG as a function of time (top
panel), ephemeral (lasting about a month) satellite captures happen when
the value of the geocentric energy becomes negative. The unit of energy is
such that the unit of mass is 1 M⊙, the unit of distance is 1 au and the unit
of time is one sidereal year divided by 2π. The path followed by 1991 VG
(same frame of reference as in Fig. 2) during the approximate time interval
(−30, −19) yr (bottom panel) shows that this minor body went around our
planet once during its previous fly-by in 1991–1992. Asteroid 1991 VG
moves clockwise (retrograde) in the figure as the time goes forward; the
temporary satellite capture event happened during 1992 February.
y
c
n
e
u
q
e
r
F
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
y
c
n
e
u
q
e
r
f
e
v
i
t
a
l
u
m
u
C
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
duration of the capture episode (d)
Figure 5. Frequency distribution of the duration of episodes of temporary
capture as natural satellite of our planet. The bin size is 7 d.
Figure 6. Duration of episodes of temporary capture as natural satellite of
our planet in days as a function of the initial values of a and e (bottom panel)
and a and i (top panel). The colours (or grey scale) in the colour maps are
proportional to the duration in days of the episode in Fig. 5. The results of
106 experiments are plotted (see the text for details).
(if it is at the Hill radius); therefore, most of the temporary cap-
tures recorded in our numerical experiment do not qualify as true
satellites according to Rickman & Malmort (1981) because they
did not complete at least one revolution when bound to the Earth;
following the terminology used by Fedorets et al. (2017), we may
speak of temporarily captured fly-bys in these cases. In fact and
strictly speaking, the event in Fig. 4 is compatible with a temporar-
ily captured fly-by not a temporarily captured orbiter; one of the
annual epicycles happens to (somewhat accidentally) loop around
the Earth lasting several months, but the geocentric energy is nega-
tive only for a fraction of the time taken to travel the loop. Indeed,
our limited numerical experiment has been optimized to show how
frequent temporarily captured fly-bys -not orbiters- are; the his-
togram in Fig. 6 matches reasonably well that of temporarily cap-
tured fly-bys in fig. 2 in Fedorets et al. (2017).
The topic of the capture of irregular satellites by planets has
been studied by e.g. Astakhov et al. (2003), Nesvorný, Vokrouh-
lický & Morbidelli (2007) and Emel'yanenko (2015). Jupiter is a
MNRAS 000, 1–10 (2017)
Dynamical evolution of 1991 VG
7
well-documented host for these captures (see e.g. Rickman & Mal-
mort 1981; Tancredi, Lindgren & Rickman 1990; Kary & Dones
1996). In regards to the Earth, the topic has only recently received
attention (see e.g. Baoyin, Chen & Li 2010; Granvik, Vaubaillon
& Jedicke 2012; Bolin et al. 2014; Brelsford et al. 2016; Clark et
al. 2016; Jedicke et al. 2016; Fedorets et al. 2017). Fedorets et al.
(2017) have predicted that the largest body constantly present on a
geocentric orbit could have a diameter of the order of 0.8 m.
The recent scientific interest on the subject of transient bound
companions of our planet was triggered by the exceptional close
encounter between our planet and 2006 RH120 (Bressi et al. 2008a;
Kwiatkowski et al. 2009). Kwiatkowski et al. (2009) showed
that 2006 RH120 was temporarily captured into a geocentric orbit
from 2006 July to 2007 July. In their work, they confirmed that
2006 RH120 is a natural object and it cannot be lunar ejecta; they
favour a scenario in which its capture as transient satellite was
the result of aerobraking in the Earth's atmosphere of a NEO pre-
viously moving in a standard Earth-crossing orbit with very low
MOID, a low-eccentricity Amor- or Apollo-class minor body.
If we interpret the capture of 2006 RH120 as a minimoon
within the context of our previous numerical experiment, in which
the probability of remaining captured for an entire year is about
10−6, this episode might be a statistical fluke or perhaps indicate
that the population of NEOs capable of experiencing such episodes
is exceedingly large. In principle, our results strongly favour the
interpretation of the 2006 RH120 capture episode as a clear outlier.
Short-lived satellite capture events consistent with those in Figs 5
and 6 have been routinely observed in simulations of real NEOs
moving in Earth-like orbits (see e.g. the discussion in de la Fuente
Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos 2013, 2014, 2015a). While our sim-
ulations show that the capture episode experienced by 1991 VG
is unusual but not uncommon, the one by 2006 RH120 seems to
be truly uncommon and it is difficult to assume that the same sce-
nario that led 1991 VG to become a minimoon can be applied to
2006 RH120 as well. However, as 2006 RH120 is a confirmed (by
radar) natural object, it is reasonable to assume that 1991 VG is
natural too. Within the context of numerical experiments optimized
to study temporarily captured orbiters -not fly-bys- the case of
2006 RH120 is not unusual though. In fact, Granvik et al. (2012)
and Fedorets et al. (2017) found a good match between the prob-
ability associated with the capture of 2006 RH120 and predictions
from their models for the temporarily captured orbiter population.
The orbital solution in Table 1 predicts that in addition to its
close approaches to our planet in 2017–2018 (2017 August 7 and
2018 February 11) and 1991–1992 (1991 December 5 and 1992
April 9), 1991 VG experienced similar fly-bys on 1938 August 31
and 1939 March 14, then on 1956 June 14 and 1957 March 26, and
more recently on 1974 August 27 and 1975 March 15. The first two
dates predate the start of any human space exploration programme,
so they can be customarily discarded. The date in 1956 follows
some suborbital tests, one of them on June 13; the same can be
said about 1957, another suborbital flight took place on March 25.
It is highly unlikely that debris from suborbital tests could have
been able to escape into a heliocentric orbit to return at a later time.
There were no documented launches in or around 1975 March 15,
but the spacecraft Soyuz 15 was launched on 1974 August 26 at
19:58:05 UTC (Clark 1988; Newkirk 1990). This manned space-
craft failed to dock with the Salyut 3 space station due to some
electronic malfunction and returned to the ground safely two days
later. One may argue that 1991 VG might be some part of Soyuz 15
(perhaps some stage of the Proton K/D launch system) as the time
match is very good, but Soyuz 15 followed a low-Earth orbit and it
8
C. de la Fuente Marcos and R. de la Fuente Marcos
is extremely unlikely that any of the stages of the heavy-lift launch
vehicle (e.g. the second stage, 8S11K, of 14 m and 11 715 kg or
the third stage of 6.5 m and 4 185 kg, empty weights) could have
escaped the gravitational field of our planet.
Although both space debris and active spacecraft have re-
ceived temporary designations as minor bodies by mistake (see
e.g. section 9 of de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos
2015d), objects with initial conditions coming from artificial paths
tend to be removed from Earth's orbital neighbourhood rather fast
(de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos 2015d). This is
to be expected as spacecraft move under mission control com-
mands and trajectories must be corrected periodically. In addition,
the orbital solutions of the NEOs mentioned in the previous sec-
tions (including that of 1991 VG) did not require the inclusion of
any non-gravitational acceleration (e.g. pressure related) to repro-
duce the available observations with the exception of two objects,
2006 RH120 and 2009 BD, for which the effects of the radiation
pressure were detected (see e.g. Micheli et al. 2012).
Objects of artificial origin are characterized by a low value
of their bulk density (while the average asteroid density is
2 600 kg m−3, but 2006 RH120 has 400 kg m−3 and 2009 BD may
have 640 kg m−3, Micheli et al. 2012) or conversely by a high
value of its proxy, the Area to Mass Ratio (AMR), that may be
> 10−3 m2 kg−1 for an artificial object. The lowest values of the
bulk density of natural objects are linked to the presence of highly
porous rocky materials. The density of a fully loaded 8S11K was
about 886 kg m−3 and an empty one was significantly less dense
at perhaps 62 kg m−3 (as a hollow metallic shell); the AMR of an
empty 8S11K is close to 5.4×10−3 m2 kg−1. The AMR values of
the NEOs cited in this work are compatible with a natural origin for
all of them (including 1991 VG). Reproducing the paths followed
by objects of artificial origin (e.g. space debris) requires the inclu-
sion of non-gravitational accelerations in order to properly account
for the observational data; this is also applicable to inert or active
spacecraft and very likely to any putative extraterrestrial artefact.
As 1991 VG does not exhibit any of the properties characteristic of
artificial objects, it must be natural.
6 DISCUSSION
The data review and analyses carried out in the previous sections
show that, although certainly unusual, the orbital properties and the
dynamical evolution of 1991 VG are not as remarkable as originally
thought. Although initially regarded as a mystery object, it is in fact
less of a puzzle and more of a dynamically complex NEO, one of
a few dozens which roam temporarily in the neighbourhood of the
path of the Earth.
Steel (1995a, 1998) hypothesized that 1991 VG could be an
alien-made object, some type of self-replicating probe akin to that
in von Neumann's concept. In perspective, this imaginative con-
jecture may indeed be compatible with what is observed in the
sense that if an inert fleet of this type of alien-made objects is ac-
tually moving in Earth-like orbits, they would behave as an equiva-
lent population of natural objects (i.e. NEOs) moving in 1991 VG-
like orbits. The presence of a present-day active (i.e. under intel-
ligent control) fleet of alien probes can be readily discarded be-
cause the observed objects do not appear to be subjected to any
non-gravitational accelerations other than those linked to radiation
pressure and perhaps the Yarkovsky effect, and also because of the
lack of detection of any kind of alien transmissions. An inert (or
in hibernation mode) fleet of extraterrestrial artefacts would be dy-
namically indistinguishable from a population of NEOs if the val-
ues of their AMRs are low enough. However and adopting Occam's
razor, when there exist two explanations for an observed event, the
simpler one must be given precedence. Human space probes, radar,
spectroscopic and photometric observations performed over sev-
eral decades have all shown that, in the orbital neighbourhood of
the Earth, it is far more common to detect space rocks than alien
artefacts.
Scotti & Marsden (1991) and West et al. (1991) used orbital
and photometric data to argue that 1991 VG could be a human-
made object, a piece of rocket hardware or an old spacecraft that
was launched many decades ago. The orbital evolutions of relics of
human space exploration exhibit a number of traits that are distinc-
tive, if not actually unique, and the available observational evidence
indicates that none of them are present in the case of 1991 VG and
related objects; almost certainly, 1991 VG was never launched from
the Earth. The putative fast rotation period and large-amplitude
light curve reported in West et al. (1991) could be compatible with
1991 VG being the result of a relatively recent fragmentation event,
where the surface is still fresh, and an elongated boulder is tumbling
rapidly; 2014 WA366 has an orbit quite similar to that of 1991 VG,
perhaps they are both fragments of a larger object.
Tancredi (1997) put forward a novel hypothesis for the origin
of 1991 VG, ejecta from a recent lunar impact. Our calculations
strongly suggest that objects moving in 1991 VG-like orbits may
not be able to remain in this type of orbit for an extended period
of time. These integrations indicate that, perhaps, the present-day
1991 VG is less than 10 kyr old in dynamical terms, but impacts on
the Moon capable of ejecting objects the size of 1991 VG are nowa-
days very, very rare. Brasser & Wiegert (2008) have studied this is-
sue in detail and the last time that a cratering event powerful enough
to produce debris consistent with 1991 VG took place on the Moon
could be about 1 Myr ago. Unless we assume that 1991 VG was
born that way, then left the orbital neighbourhood of the Earth, and
recently was reinserted there, the presence of 1991 VG is difficult
to reconcile with an origin as lunar ejecta.
After discarding an artificial (alien or human) or lunar origin,
the option that remains is the most natural one, 1991 VG could be
an unusual but not uncommon NEO. We know of dozens of rel-
atively well-studied NEOs that move in Earth-like orbits and our
analysis shows that three of them follow 1991 VG-like orbits. All
these orbits are characterized by relatively high probabilities of ex-
periencing temporary captures as satellites of the Earth and also of
becoming trapped in a 1:1 mean motion resonance with our planet;
in a recurrent manner for both cases. We have robust numerical ev-
idence that 1991 VG has been a co-orbital and a satellite of our
planet in the past and our calculations predict that these events will
repeat in the future. Therefore, the peculiar dynamics of 1991 VG
is not so remarkable after all, when studied within the context of
other NEOs moving in Earth-like orbits. In addition to the few dis-
cussed here, multiple examples of these behaviours can be found in
the works by de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos (2013,
2015a,b, 2016a,b). NEOs moving in 1991 VG-like orbits tend to
spend less than one month as satellites (i.e. inside the Hill sphere)
of our planet and follow paths of the horseshoe type when moving
co-orbital (i.e. outside the Hill radius) to our planet; they appear to
avoid the Trojan and quasi-satellite resonant states (see e.g. de la
Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos 2014, 2015a) perhaps be-
cause of their comparatively wide semimajor axes relative to that
of the Earth. Another unusual dynamical property of 1991 VG and
related objects is that of being subjected to the Kozai-Lidov mech-
anism (see Fig. 1, second to bottom panel, libration in ω), at least
MNRAS 000, 1–10 (2017)
for brief periods of time. This is also a common behaviour observed
for many NEOs moving in Earth-like orbits (see e.g. de la Fuente
Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos 2015d).
In a seminal work, Rabinowitz et al. (1993) argued that
1991 VG and other NEOs were signalling the presence of a sec-
ondary asteroid belt around the path of our planet. These objects
are unofficially termed as the Arjunas and are a loosely resonant
family of small NEOs which form the near-Earth asteroid belt. It is
difficult to imagine that all these objects were formed as they are
today within the main asteroid belt and eventually found their way
to the NEO population as they were. None the less, the Hungarias
have been suggested as a possible direct source for this popula-
tion (Galiazzo & Schwarz 2014). NEO orbit models like the one
used here show that this is possible, but it is unclear whether the
known delivery routes are efficient enough to explain the size of
the current population of small NEOs, and in particular the sig-
nificant number of Arjunas like 1991 VG. Fragments can also be
produced in situ (i.e. in the neighbourhood of the path of the Earth)
by multiple mechanisms: subcatastrophic impacts (see e.g. Durda
et al. 2007), tidal disruptions after close encounters with planets
(see e.g. Schunová et al. 2014) or the action of the Yarkovsky–
O'Keefe–Radzievskii–Paddack (YORP) mechanism (see e.g. Bot-
tke et al. 2006). These processes can generate dynamically coherent
groups of genetically related objects -although YORP spin-up is
considered dominant (see e.g. Jacobson et al. 2016)- which may
randomize their orbits in a relatively short time-scale as they move
through an intrinsically chaotic environment (see Fig. 3). In ad-
dition, the superposition of mean motion and secular resonances
creates dynamical families of physically unrelated objects (see e.g.
de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos 2016c) which inter-
twine with true families resulting from fragmentation. On a more
practical side, all these objects are easily accessible targets for any
planned NEO sample-return missions (see e.g. García Yárnoz et
al. 2013) or even commercial mining (see e.g. Lewis 1996; Stacey
& Connors 2009). Bolin et al. (2014) have predicted that, while
objects like 1991 VG or 2006 RH120 are extremely challenging to
discover using the currently available telescope systems, the Large
Synoptic Survey Telescope or LSST (see e.g. Chesley et al. 2009)
may be able to start discovering them on a monthly basis when in
full operation, commencing in January 2022.
Our independent assessment of the current dynamical status
and short-term orbital evolution of 1991 VG leads us to arrive to
the same basic conclusion reached by Brasser & Wiegert (2008):
asteroid 1991 VG had to have its origin on a low-inclination Amor-
or Apollo-class object. However and given its size, it must be a
fragment of a larger object and as such it may have been produced
in situ, i.e. within the orbital neighbourhood of the Earth–Moon
system, during the relatively recent past (perhaps a few kyr ago).
7 CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, we have studied the dynamical evolution of 1991 VG,
an interesting and controversial NEO. This investigation has been
carried out using N-body simulations and statistical analyses. Our
conclusions can be summarized as follows.
(i) Asteroid 1991 VG currently moves in a somewhat Earth-
like orbit, but it is not an Earth's co-orbital now. It has been
a transient co-orbital of the horseshoe type in the past and it
will return as such in the future.
(ii) Extensive N-body simulations confirm that the orbit of
1991 VG is chaotic on time-scales longer than a few decades.
MNRAS 000, 1–10 (2017)
Dynamical evolution of 1991 VG
9
(iii) Our calculations confirm that 1991 VG was a natural satel-
lite of our planet for about one month in 1992 and show that
this situation may have repeated multiple times in the past and
it is expected to happen again in the future. Being a recurrent
ephemeral natural satellite of the Earth is certainly unusual,
but a few other known NEOs exhibit this behaviour as well.
(iv) A realistic NEO orbit model shows that although quite im-
probable, the presence of objects moving in 1991 VG-like or-
bits is not impossible within the framework defined by our
current understanding of how minor bodies are delivered from
the main asteroid belt to the NEO population.
(v) Consistently, we find three other minor bodies -2001 GP2,
2008 UA202 and 2014 WA366- that move in orbits similar to
that of 1991 VG.
(vi) NEOs, moving in 1991 VG-like orbits have a probability
close to 0.004 of becoming transient irregular natural satel-
lites of our planet.
(vii) Our results show that, although featuring unusual orbital
properties and dynamics, there is no compelling reason to
consider that 1991 VG could be a relic of human space ex-
ploration and definitely it is not an alien artefact or probe.
The remarkable object 1991 VG used to be considered mysterious
and puzzling, but the new data cast serious doubt on any possible
origin for this NEO other than a natural one. We find no evidence
whatsoever of an extraterrestrial or intelligent origin for this object.
Spectroscopic studies during its next perigee on 2018 February may
be able to provide better constraints about its most plausible source,
in particular whether it is a recent fragment or not.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank the referee, M. Granvik, for his constructive, thorough
and very helpful reports, S. J. Aarseth for providing the code used
in this research, A. I. Gómez de Castro, I. Lizasoain and L. Hernán-
dez Yáñez of the Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) for
providing access to computing facilities. This work was partially
supported by the Spanish 'Ministerio de Economía y Competitivi-
dad' (MINECO) under grant ESP2014-54243-R. Part of the calcu-
lations and the data analysis were completed on the EOLO clus-
ter of the UCM, and we thank S. Cano Alsúa for his help during
this stage. EOLO, the HPC of Climate Change of the International
Campus of Excellence of Moncloa, is funded by the MECD and
MICINN. This is a contribution to the CEI Moncloa. In prepara-
tion of this paper, we made use of the NASA Astrophysics Data
System, the ASTRO-PH e-print server, and the MPC data server.
REFERENCES
Aarseth S. J., 2003, Gravitational N-body Simulations. Cambridge Univ.
Press, Cambridge, p. 27
Astakhov S. A., Burbanks A. D., Wiggins S., Farrelly D., 2003, Nature,
423, 264
Baoyin H.-X., Chen Y., Li J.-F., 2010, Res. Astron. Astrophys., 10, 587
Bolin B. et al., 2014, Icarus, 241, 280
Bottke W. F., Jr., Vokrouhlický D., Rubincam D. P., Nesvorný D., 2006,
Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 34, 157
Bottke W. F., Jr. et al., 2014, Am. Geophys. Union, Fall Meeting 2014,
Abstract No. P12B-09
Brasser R., Wiegert P., 2008, MNRAS, 386, 2031
Brelsford S., Chyba M., Haberkorn T., Patterson G., 2016, Planet. Space
Sci., 123, 4
10
C. de la Fuente Marcos and R. de la Fuente Marcos
Bressi T. H. et al., 2008a, MPEC Circ., MPEC 2008-D12.
Bressi T. H. et al., 2008b, MPEC Circ., MPEC 2008-V06.
Bressi T. H., Scotti J. V., Hug G., 2013, MPEC Circ., MPEC 2013-B72.
Brown P. G. et al., 2013, Nature, 503, 238
Buzzi L. et al., 2009, MPEC Circ., MPEC 2009-B14.
Carusi A., Valsecchi G. B., 1979, Riun. Soc. Astron. Ital., 22, 181
Chamberlin A. B., Chesley S. R., Chodas P. W., Giorgini J. D., Keesey
M. S., Wimberly R. N., Yeomans D. K., 2001, AAS/Div. Planet. Sci.
Meeting Abstr., 33, 41.08
Chesley S. R., Brown M. E., Durech J., Harris A. W., Ivezi´c Ž., Jones R. L.,
Kneževi´c Z., LSST Solar System Science Collaboration, 2009, AAS
Meeting Abstr., 41, 460.17
Chodas P., 2015, AAS/Div. Planet. Sci. Meeting Abstr., 47, 214.09
Clark P., 1988, The Soviet Manned Space Program. Orion Books, New York
Clark D. L., Spurný P., Wiegert P., Brown P., Borovicka J., Tagliaferri E.,
Shrbený L., 2016, AJ, 151, 135
Kneževi´c Z., Milani A., 2000, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 78, 17
Kozai Y., 1962, AJ, 67, 591
Kwiatkowski T. et al., 2009, A&A, 495, 967
Lewis J. S., 1996, Mining the Sky: Untold Riches from the Asteroids,
Comets, and Planets. Addison-Wesley, Reading, p. 82
Lidov M. L., 1962, Planet. Space Sci., 9, 719
Lindblad B. A., 1994, in Kozai Y., Binzel R. P., Hirayama T., eds, ASP
Conf. Ser. Vol. 63, Seventy-five Years of Hirayama Asteroid Families:
the Role of Collisions in the Solar System History. Astron. Soc. Pac.,
San Francisco, p. 62
Lindblad B. A., Southworth R. B., 1971, in Gehrels T., ed., Proc. IAU Col-
loq. 12: Physical Studies of Minor Planets. Univ. Sydney, Tucson, AZ,
p. 337
Makino J., 1991, ApJ, 369, 200
McGaha J. E. et al., 2006, MPEC Circ., MPEC 2006-J38.
McMillan R. S., Scotti J. V., Gleason A. E., Spahr T. B., 2001, MPEC Circ.,
Connors M., Chodas P., Mikkola S., Wiegert P., Veillet C., Innanen K.,
MPEC 2001-H04.
2002, Meteorit. Planet. Sci., 37, 1435
Connors M., Veillet C., Brasser R., Wiegert P., Chodas P., Mikkola S., In-
nanen K., 2004, Meteorit. Planet. Sci., 39, 1251
Cowen R., 1993, Sci. News, 143, 117
de la Fuente Marcos C., de la Fuente Marcos R., 2012, MNRAS, 427, 728
de la Fuente Marcos C., de la Fuente Marcos R., 2013, MNRAS, 434, L1
de la Fuente Marcos C., de la Fuente Marcos R., 2014, MNRAS, 445, 2985
de la Fuente Marcos C., de la Fuente Marcos R., 2015a, Astron. Nachr.,
336, 5
de la Fuente Marcos C., de la Fuente Marcos R., 2015b, MNRAS, 446, L31
de la Fuente Marcos C., de la Fuente Marcos R., 2015c, MNRAS, 453, 1288
de la Fuente Marcos C., de la Fuente Marcos R., 2015d, A&A, 580, A109
de la Fuente Marcos C., de la Fuente Marcos R., 2016a, Ap&SS, 361, 16
de la Fuente Marcos C., de la Fuente Marcos R., 2016b, Ap&SS, 361, 121
de la Fuente Marcos C., de la Fuente Marcos R., 2016c, MNRAS, 456, 2946
de la Fuente Marcos C., de la Fuente Marcos R., Mialle P., 2016, Ap&SS,
361, 358
Drummond J. D., 1981, Icarus, 45, 545
Durda D. D., Bottke W. F., Nesvorný D., Enke B. L., Merline W. J., Asphaug
E., Richardson D. C., 2007, Icarus, 186, 498
Emel'yanenko N. Y., 2015, Sol. Sys. Res., 49, 404
Fedorets G., Granvik M., Jedicke R., 2017, Icarus, 285, 83
Foglia S., Masi G., 2004, MPBu, 31, 100
Galiazzo M. A., Schwarz R., 2014, MNRAS, 445, 3999
García Yárnoz D., Sanchez J. P., McInnes C. R., 2013, Celest. Mech. Dyn.
Astron., 116, 367
Gibbs A. R. et al., 2014, MPEC Circ., MPEC 2014-X13.
Gilmore A. C. et al., 2008, MPEC Circ., MPEC 2008-K48.
Giorgini J., 2011, in Capitaine N., ed., Proc. Journées 2010 'Systèmes de
référence spatio-temporels' (JSR2010), New Challenges for Reference
Systems and Numerical Standards in Astronomy. Observatoire de Paris,
Paris, p. 87
Giorgini J. D., 2015, IAU Gen. Assem. Meeting, 29, 2256293
Giorgini J. D., Yeomans D. K., 1999, On-Line System Provides Accurate
Ephemeris and Related Data, NASA TECH BRIEFS, NPO-20416, p.
48
Giorgini J. D. et al., 1996, BAAS, 28, 1158
Giorgini J. D., Chodas P. W., Yeomans D. K., 2001, BAAS, 33, 1562
Gladman B., Michel P., Froeschlé C., 2000, Icarus, 146, 176
Granvik M., Vaubaillon J., Jedicke R., 2012, Icarus, 218, 262
Granvik M. et al., 2013a, Eur. Planet. Sci. Congr. 2013, 8, EPSC2013-999
Granvik M. et al., 2013b, AAS/Div. Planet. Sci. Meeting Abstr., 45, 106.02
Hainaut O., Koschny D., Micheli M., 2017, MPEC Circ., MPEC 2017-L02.
Holmes R., Foglia S., Buzzi L., Linder T., 2015, MPEC Circ., MPEC 2015-
P64.
Jacobson S. A., Marzari F., Rossi A., Scheeres D. J., 2016, Icarus, 277, 381
Jedicke R., Bolin B., Bottke W. F., Chyba M., Fedorets G., Granvik M.,
Patterson G., 2016, in Chesley S. R., Morbidelli A., Jedicke R., Farnoc-
chia D., eds, Proc. IAU Symp. 318, Asteroids: New Observations, New
Models. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, p. 86
Kary D. M., Dones L., 1996, Icarus, 121, 207
McNaught R. H. et al., 2003, MPEC Circ., MPEC 2003-Y76.
Micheli M., Tholen D. J., Elliott G. T., 2012, New Astron., 17, 446
Milani A., 1993, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 57, 59
Milani A., 1995, in Roy A. E., Steves B. A., eds, From Newton to Chaos.
Modern Techniques for Understanding and Coping with Chaos in N-
body Dynamical Systems, Vol. 336. Plenum Press, New York, p. 47
Milani A., Kneževi´c Z., 1994, Icarus, 107, 219
Milani A., Chesley S. R., Valsecchi G. B., 1999, A&A, 346, L65
Milani A., Cellino A., Kneževi´c Z., Novakovi´c B., Spoto F., Paolicchi P.,
2014, Icarus, 239, 46
Milani A., Kneževi´c Z., Spoto F., Cellino A., Novakovi´c B., Tsirvoulis G.,
2017, Icarus, 288, 240
Murray C. D., Dermott S. F., 1999, Solar System Dynamics. Cambridge
Univ. Press, Cambridge, p. 97
Nesvorný D., Vokrouhlický D., Morbidelli A., 2007, AJ, 133, 1962
Newkirk D., 1990, Almanac of Soviet Manned Space Flight. Gulf Publish-
ing Company, Texas
Nugent C. R., Margot J. L., Chesley S. R., Vokrouhlický D., 2012, AJ, 144,
60
Popova O. P. et al., 2013, Science, 342, 1069
Rabinowitz D. L. et al., 1993, Nature, 363, 704
Rickman H., Malmort A. M., 1981, A&A, 102, 165
Schunová E., Jedicke R., Walsh K. J., Granvik M., Wainscoat R. J.,
Haghighipour N., 2014, Icarus, 238, 156
Scotti J. V., Marsden B. G., 1991, IAU Circ., 5387, 1
Scotti J. et al., 1991, IAU Circ., 5401, 2
Smalley K. et al., 2002, MPEC Circ., MPEC 2002-A92.
Southworth R. B., Hawkins G. S., 1963, Smithsonian Contrib. Astrophys.,
7, 261
Stacey R. G., Connors M., 2009, Planet. Space Sci., 57, 822
Standish E. M., 1998,
JPL Planetary and Lunar Ephemerides,
Jet Propulsion
Interoffice Memo. 312.F-98-048,
DE405/LE405,
Laboratory, Pasadena, California
Steel D., 1995a, The Observatory, 115, 78
Steel D. I., 1995b, MNRAS, 273, 1091
Steel D., 1998, The Observatory, 118, 226
Tancredi G., 1997, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 69, 119
Tancredi G., Lindgren M., Rickman H., 1990, A&A, 239, 375
Tatum J. B., 1997, J. R. Astron. Soc. Canada, 91, 276
Vaduvescu O. et al., 2014, MPEC Circ., MPEC 2014-P23.
Vaduvescu O. et al., 2015, MNRAS, 449, 1614
Valsecchi G. B., Jopek T. J., Froeschle C., 1999, MNRAS, 304, 743
Weiler H., 1996, The Observatory, 116, 316
Weiler H., 1998, The Observatory, 118, 226
West R. M., Wisniewski W., McDowell J., Rast R., Chodas P., Marsden
B. G., 1991, IAU Circ., 5402, 1
Wiegert P. A., Innanen K. A., Mikkola S., 1998, AJ, 115, 2604
This paper has been typeset from a TEX/LATEX file prepared by the author.
MNRAS 000, 1–10 (2017)
|
1506.00150 | 1 | 1506 | 2015-05-30T18:23:51 | Space-Based Thermal Infrared Studies of Asteroids | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | Large-area surveys operating at mid-infrared wavelengths have proven to be a valuable means of discovering and characterizing minor planets. Through the use of radiometric models, it is possible to derive physical properties such as diameters, albedos, and thermal inertia for large numbers of objects. Modern detector array technology has resulted in a significant improvement in spatial resolution and sensitivity compared with previous generations of space-based infrared telescopes, giving rise to a commensurate increase in the number of objects that have been observed at these wavelengths. Space-based infrared surveys of asteroids therefore offer an effective means of rapidly gathering information about small body populations' orbital and physical properties. The AKARI, WISE/NEOWISE, Spitzer, and Herschel missions have significantly increased the number of minor planets with well-determined diameters and albedos. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph |
Space-Based Thermal Infrared Studies of Asteroids
Amy Mainzer
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
Fumihiko Usui
The University of Tokyo
David E. Trilling
Northern Arizona University
Large-area surveys operating at mid-infrared wavelengths have proven to be a valuable
means of discovering and characterizing minor planets. Through the use of radiometric models,
it is possible to derive physical properties such as diameters, albedos, and thermal inertia
for large numbers of objects. Modern detector array technology has resulted in a significant
improvement in spatial resolution and sensitivity compared with previous generations of space-
based infrared telescopes, giving rise to a commensurate increase in the number of objects that
have been observed at these wavelengths. Space-based infrared surveys of asteroids therefore
offer an effective method of rapidly gathering information about small body populations orbital
and physical properties. The AKARI, WISE/NEOWISE, Spitzer, and Herschel missions
have significantly increased the number of minor planets with well-determined diameters and
albedos.
1.
INTRODUCTION
A variety of remote sensing techniques have given rise
to much of our understanding of the small body popula-
tions in our solar system. Ground-based surveys operating
at visible wavelengths have discovered most of the minor
planets that are known today. At present, roughly 670,000
asteroids have been discovered in the Main Belt between
Mars and Jupiter, ∼12,000 near-Earth objects (NEOs) are
known at all sizes, and some 5000 Jovian Trojans have been
found. While these numbers are thought to represent only a
tiny fraction of the small bodies believed to exist in our so-
lar system, much can be learned about these populations by
studying the physical and dynamical properties of represen-
tative samples (e.g. Bottke et al. 2005; Mainzer et al. 2011b;
Grav et al. 2011a, and Jedicke et al. in this volume). More-
over, information about the probable composition and min-
eralogy of asteroids can be learned from visible and near-
infrared (VNIR) spectroscopy and spectrophotometry. Such
studies have been carried out for ∼2500 asteroids (e.g. the
MIT-UH-IRTF Joint Campaign for NEO Spectral Recon-
naisance, Tholen & Barucci 1989; Xu et al. 1995; Bus &
Binzel 2002; DeMeo et al. 2009; Reddy 2010; Kuroda et al.
2014, and many others). Compared to broadband imaging,
spectrally resolved observations require brighter sources for
the same signal-to-noise ratio, which limits the number of
targets observable. The fourth release of the Sloan Digi-
tal Sky Survey (SDSS) Moving Object Catalog (Stoughton
et al. 2002; Abazajian et al. 2003) provided ∼100,000 ob-
servations in u, g, r, i, and z filters, leading to taxonomic
classifications for ∼64,000 asteroids (Carvano et al. 2010).
Asteroid lightcurves, sometimes combined with stel-
lar occultation data, have been inverted to obtain mod-
els of shapes and rotational states for hundreds of ob-
jects (Kaasalainen et al. 2001; Durech et al. 2010, see also
Durech et al. in this volume). Radar observations can pro-
duce the most detailed information about shape, size, orbit,
and spin state short of visiting a body with spacecraft (e.g.
Ostro et al. 2002, and Benner et al. in this volume). Since
radar echoes must be sent to and received from a body, sen-
sitivity drops as distance to the fourth power, so objects
must make fairly close approaches in order to be detected.
Approximately 600 asteroids have been observed with radar
to date(http://echo.jpl.nasa.gov/asteroids/index.html). Po-
larimetry offers a means of studying asteroid surface prop-
erties, but since only a small fraction of the total luminosity
is polarized, this technique has been applied to ∼300 as-
teroids thus far (Lupishko & Vasilyev 2012; Gil-Hutton &
Canada-Assandri 2012).
While powerful, these techniques have only been em-
ployed on a small fraction of asteroids. Until recently,
for the vast majority of asteroids, nothing was known ex-
cept for absolute visible magnitudes (denoted H) and or-
bital parameters. Observing small bodies at thermal in-
frared (IR) wavelengths with space telescopes complements
other techniques such as visible light ground-based surveys,
VNIR spectroscopy and spectrophotometry, radar studies,
and in situ spacecraft visits.
If a telescope can be cryo-
genically cooled such that its sensitivity is limited by the
natural backgrounds in space, rather than by self-emission,
1
it is possible to obtain measurements of physical properties
such as diameters and albedos very rapidly for a large num-
ber of asteroids. Advances in IR detector technology have
made it possible to achieve diffraction-limited imaging and
orders-of-magnitude improvement in sensitivity compared
to previous generations of IR space telescopes such as the
Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS; Neugebauer et al.
1984; Tedesco et al. 2002b), the Mid-Course Space Exper-
iment (MSX; Mill et al. 1994; Price et al. 2001; Tedesco
et al. 2002a) and the Infrared Space Observatory (ISO;
Kessler et al. 1996). More recent surveys have now ob-
served a substantial fraction of the known asteroids at ther-
mal IR wavelengths, allowing for robust determinations of
their diameters and (where corresponding visible light ob-
servations are available) albedos. These measurements in
turn inform the understanding of the dynamical and colli-
sional history of the asteroids, their probable compositions
and structure, and the impact hazard they pose to the Earth.
Ground-based thermal IR observations began to play an
important role in the physical characterization of the largest
asteroids beginning in the 1970s with the advent of IR de-
tectors (e.g. Allen 1970, 1971; Matson 1971). These obser-
vations require the largest ground-based telescopes due to
the enormous thermal background from the Earth's atmo-
sphere and the telescope itself (backgrounds ∼ 106 lower
between ∼4-200 µm are achievable with a space-based
cooled telescope). Moreover, the Earth's atmospheric opac-
ity restricts ground-based observations to selected wave-
lengths. Some mid-IR instruments are available on ground-
based telescopes, especially at high-altitude observatories
in Hawaii and Chile, leading to observations of several hun-
dred objects to date (e.g. Hansen 1976; Cruikshank 1977;
Lebofsky et al. 1978; Morrison & Lebofsky 1979; Delb´o
et al. 2003, 2011; Matter et al. 2011; Muller et al. 2012,
2013; Wolters et al. 2005, 2008).
Thermal IR fluxes can be used to derive physical prop-
erties such as effective spherical diameter (defined as the
diameter of a spherical thermal model asteroid emitting the
same IR flux as that observed) through the use of radiomet-
ric models. Section 3 below and Delbo et al. (this volume)
give a more detailed description of common thermal mod-
els; see also Harris & Lagerros (2002). Small body spec-
tral energy distributions consist of the sum of blackbody
curves produced by reflected sunlight, centered at visible
wavelengths, and blackbody curves generated by thermal
emission from areas at different temperatures. The central
wavelength of the thermal peak depends on an object's he-
liocentric distance and thermal properties but usually lies
somewhere between 5 -- 20 µm for most asteroids interior
to Saturn's orbit. Hence, by combining orbital information
with thermal IR observations that bracket an object's rota-
tional lightcurve, it is possible to constrain the total energy
being emitted by an asteroid and convert this into an effec-
tive spherical diameter. With only a single IR measurement,
it is possible to compute a projected size, but this does not
necessarily correspond to the effective spherical diameter
if the object is elongated. Diameters derived from good-
quality thermal IR measurements are considerably more ac-
curate than those estimated from visible light observations
alone, since an asteroid's visible flux depends strongly on
its albedo. With multiple thermally-dominated IR bands
that adequately sample rotational phase, effective spheri-
cal diameters can be determined to within ±10% (Mainzer
et al. 2011c); see Section 3 for a more detailed discussion.
However, since asteroid albedos range from a few percent
to ∼50% (e.g. Binzel et al. 2004; Mainzer et al. 2011b), ef-
fective spherical diameters derived from only visible light
measurements are typically uncertain by factors of 2-3. If
both IR and visible observations are available, it is possible
to solve for albedo as well.
Space-based thermal IR surveys therefore offer a num-
ber of advantages for understanding small body popula-
tions. Since an asteroid's visible flux is a strong function
of its albedo, visible light surveys are preferentially biased
against low albedo objects, which are intrinsically dimmer
than higher albedo asteroids. By contrast, surveys that in-
dependently detect asteroids (whether previously known or
new) based solely on their thermal IR flux are approxi-
mately equally sensitive to low and high albedo asteroids.
IR-selected samples directly measure diameter and are in-
sensitive to albedo, allowing for direct determination of a
population's size-frequency distribution rather than its H-
magnitude distribution. An IR-selected sample can there-
fore be readily extrapolated to determine the orbital and
physical properties of the underlying population.
In addition, albedos derived from the combination of vis-
ible and IR observations offer clues to an object's proba-
ble composition. Accurate measurements of asteroid diam-
eters are needed to constrain the impact energy of poten-
tially hazardous objects and inform mitigation strategies.
Space-based telescopes can, depending on their design, ob-
serve regions of sky that are inaccessible to ground-based
observers. All-sky surveys offer the additional benefit of
sampling the population of objects with high inclinations
more thoroughly. Thermal IR observations can be used to
determine thermal inertia, a key parameter for understand-
ing the nature of asteroid regoliths (see Delbo et al., this
volume). Depending on wavelength and spectral resolution,
space-based IR instruments can allow for measurement of
emission and absorption features that are difficult or impos-
sible to access from ground-based facilities.
2. The Missions
The IRAS space telescope was the first space mission
to survey the minor planets at thermal IR wavelengths in
1983, followed by MSX and ISO in 1995 -- 1998 and 1996 --
1997, respectively. With 62 pixels and a 60-cm telescope,
the IRAS mission observed ∼2200 asteroids (Matson et al.
1989; Veeder et al. 1989; Tedesco et al. 2002b). ISO ob-
served ∼40 different asteroids in targeted mode (Dotto et al.
2002), and MSX observed an additional ∼30 objects not
detected by IRAS (Tedesco et al. 2002a).
IRAS was not
diffraction limited due to the large physical size of its pixels;
2
its minimum spatial resolution was ∼30 arcsec. IRAS dis-
covered six asteroids, including (3200) Phaethon, the parent
body of the Geminid meteor stream (Whipple 1983; Green
et al. 1985), and five comets.
As larger-format IR arrays with smaller pixels and lower
noise became available, they were incorporated into next-
generation observatories such as the Spitzer Space Tele-
scope (Werner et al. 2004), the AKARI mission (Murakami
et al. 2007), the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE;
Wright et al. 2010), and the Herschel Space Telescope (Pil-
bratt et al. 2010). These new arrays allowed for Nyquist-
sampled images (i.e. the pixel width is less than half the size
of the point spread function produced by the telescope), im-
proving spatial resolution and sensitivity by orders of mag-
nitude over IRAS and MSX.
The advances in microelectronics, visible-light camera
chips, and tactical sensors are directly responsible for the
vast improvement in sensitivity and miniaturization from
the IRAS mission to today. The 62 IRAS detectors were
individually manufactured and hand-assembled; each pixel
was ∼1-2 mm across (Young 1993). Major developments
since IRAS include the advent of monolithically fabricated
arrays of pixels and the ability to produce semiconduc-
tor material with extremely low levels of impurities. The
result is the development of megapixel IR arrays capable
of achieving low read noise and dark currents well below
the natural zodiacal background at thermal IR wavelengths.
For example, the WISE mission included four 10242 detec-
tor arrays, each with 18 µm pixels (Mainzer et al. 2005).
Recent developments include the fabrication of megapixel
mid-IR detectors capable of operating at higher tempera-
tures, which will ease the burden on cryogenic systems for
future missions (McMurtry et al. 2013).
Spitzer, AKARI, WISE, and Herschel were cryogeni-
cally cooled during their prime mission phases, and all but
Herschel continued to operate using the wavelengths that
remained available following depletion of their liquid or
solid cryogens. Table 1 summarizes the key technical and
operational differences between them. Spitzer and Herschel
functioned as general-purpose observatories, with a wide
range of observing modes employed during their fully cryo-
genic missions. Both performed targeted observations of
previously known objects; neither mission has been widely
used for asteroid discovery. WISE operated in a single sur-
vey mode, covering the entire sky in six months. Modifi-
cations to its science data processing pipeline allowed new
discoveries of minor planets to be made. The primary ob-
jective of the AKARI mission was to carry out an all-sky
survey; AKARI also had the capability of performing tar-
geted spectroscopic and imaging observations. After the
liquid cryogen boiled off, only near-IR observations in a tar-
geted mode were carried out. AKARI did not discover new
asteroids; the all-sky observing cadence did not support the
multiple observations needed to discover new moving ob-
jects.
In this chapter, we review only space-based asteroid
studies from remote telescopic observations. For a detailed
discussion of the results from mid-IR observations of small
bodies carried out by in situ missions such as Dawn and
Rosetta, the reader is referred to chapters by Barucci et al.
and Russel et al. (this volume). These missions gathered
thermal IR maps of bodies such as (2867) Steins (Leyrat
et al. 2011), (21) Lutetia, and (4) Vesta (Keihm et al. 2012;
Tosi et al. 2014; Capria et al. 2014).
2.1. The Spitzer Space Telescope
The Spitzer Space Telescope was launched on August 25,
2003 into an Earth-trailing orbit (Werner et al. 2004). As a
NASA "Great Observatory," it was designed to function as a
facility observatory for the astrophysics and planetary com-
munities. The 85 cm telescope was launched warm, sitting
atop a ∼350 L superfluid helium cryostat that enclosed the
instruments and fine guidance sensor. During its 5.5 year
fully cryogenic mission, three instruments were available:
the Infrared Array Camera (IRAC; an imager operating at
3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8 µm; Fazio et al. 2004), the Multiband
Imaging Photometer for Spitzer (MIPS; imaging and spec-
troscopy covering the wavelength range 24 - 160 µm; Rieke
et al. 2004), and the Infrared Spectrograph (IRS; low and
medium resolution spectroscopy between 5 - 35 µm and
imaging at 16 and 22 µm; Houck et al. 2004). The IRAC
instrument observed the 3.4 and 5.8 µm channels simul-
taneously, and the 4.5 and 8 µm channels simultaneously.
During the fully cryogenic portion of the Spitzer mission,
the telescope temperature was maintained below 8 K using
vapor escaping from the superfluid helium cryostat; focal
planes were maintained at 1.4 K to support operation of the
longest wavelengths.
In 2008, the liquid helium was depleted; at this point, the
focal planes and telescope reached an equilibrium tempera-
ture near 29 K. The 3.6 and 4.5 µm channels of IRAC con-
tinued to operate via passive cooling in an extended Warm
Mission phase (Storrie-Lombardi & Dodd 2012). Hundreds
of asteroids throughout the Solar System were targeted us-
ing all three Spitzer instruments during the fully cryogenic
and Warm Mission phases (e.g. Emery et al. 2006; Trilling
et al. 2010; Licandro et al. 2012, among others).
Data from Spitzer can be accessed through the Spitzer
Heritage Archive (http://sha.ipac.caltech.edu). In general,
proprietary periods are one year for Guest Observer pro-
grams.
2.2. AKARI
Consisting of a 68.5 cm telescope, the AKARI satellite
(meaning "light" as opposed to representing an acronym)
launched on February 21, 2006 into a Sun-synchronous po-
lar orbit at 700 km altitude (Murakami et al. 2007). AKARI
carried two instruments, the InfraRed Camera (IRC; Onaka
et al. 2007) and the Far-Infrared Surveyor (FIS; Kawada
et al. 2007), covering the spectral ranges of 2 -- 26 µm and
50 -- 180 µm, respectively. The whole telescope and instru-
ments were cooled down to ∼6 K using 180 liters of super-
fluid helium and two sets of two-stage Stirling cycle me-
3
SUMMARY OF RECENT SPACE-BASED IR TELESCOPE CAPABILITIES
TABLE 1
Mission
Dates
Wavelengths
Field of
View (arcmin)
Observing
Modes
IRAC: Imaging 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8 µm
IRS: Spectroscopy 5-35 µm
IRS: Imaging 16, 22 µm
MIPS: Imaging 24, 70, 160 µm
MIPS: Spectroscopy 55 - 95 µm
IRAC: Imaging 3.6 & 4.5 µm
IRC: Imaging 9, 18 µm
FIS: Imaging 65, 90, 140, 160 µm
IRC: Imaging
2.4, 3.2, 4.1, 7, 9, 11, 15, 18, 24 µm
IRC: Spectroscopy 1.8-5.2,
5.4-12.9, 17.5-25.7 µm
FIS: Imaging 65, 90, 140, 160 µm
FIS: Spectroscopy 60-180 µm
IRC: Imaging 2.4, 3.2, 4.1 µm
IRC: Spectroscopy 2.5-5 µm
Imaging 3.4, 4.6, 12, 22 µm
Imaging 3.4 & 4.6 µm
HIFI: Spectroscopy 157-212
& 240-625 µm
PACS: Imaging at 70, 100, 160 µm
PACS: Spectroscopy 55-210 µm
SPIRE: Imaging 250, 350, 500 µm
SPIRE: Spectroscopy 194-617 µm
IRAC: 5x5
IRS: ∼0.9x1.35
MIPS: 5x5
IRAC: 5x5
IRC: 10 (cross-scan direction)
FIS: 8-12
(cross-scan direction)
IRC imaging: 10 x 10
FIS imaging:
8-12 (cross-scan direction)
IRC imaging: 10 x 10
47x47
47x47
PACS Imager:
1.75x3.5
PACS Spectrometer:
47x47
SPIRE Imager: 4x8
Spectrometer: 2.6
Targeted
Targeted
Survey
Targeted
Targeted
Survey
Survey
Targeted
Spitzer
2003-2008
Spitzer
2008 - present
AKARI
2006-2007
AKARI
2006-2007
AKARI
2008-2011
WISE
NEOWISE
2010-2011
2013-present
Herschel
2009-2013
NOTE. -- As of March 2015.
4
chanical coolers (Nakagawa et al. 2007). AKARI's liquid
helium supply lasted until August 26, 2007 and enabled 550
days of fully cryogenic operations (the AKARI "cold mis-
sion").
During the cold mission phase, AKARI completed an
all-sky survey at six bands: 9, 18, 65, 90, 140, and 160 µm
(Ishihara et al. 2010; Yamamura et al. 2010). The mid-IR
part of the all-sky survey was conducted at two broad bands
centered at 9 and 18 µm with the IRC. More than 90% of the
sky was observed with both bands, and a large portion of the
sky was observed more than three times. The point source
catalog of ∼877,000 objects was produced from the mid-
IR images of the all-sky survey data (Ishihara et al. 2010).
An asteroid catalog was also constructed from the mid-IR
survey data (Usui et al. 2011). The 16-month cold mission
allowed the inner edge of the Main Belt to be observed at
least once (Usui et al. 2013). AKARI detected point sources
by identifying objects that were detected at least twice at the
same fixed point on the sky, leaving transient sources to be
identified with the list of solar system bodies known at the
time of data processing. Most asteroids in the AKARI cata-
log were detected fewer than five times, with ∼25% having
one detection (Usui et al. 2011). The two mid-IR bands
observed different regions of the sky, separated by ∼25(cid:48)
in the cross-scan direction; thus, solar system objects were
not observed simultaneously in both bands. In total, 5120
known asteroids were identified with AKARI detections.
The list of derived sizes and albedos, known as the As-
teroid Catalog Using AKARI (AcuA), is publicly available
(http://darts.isas.jaxa.jp/ir/akari/catalogue/AcuA.html). The
IR fluxes of individual asteroids observed with AKARI will
also be released in the near future.
The instruments on board AKARI performed both deep
imaging and spectroscopy in the targeted observation mode,
occasionally inserted into a continuous survey operation.
The targeted observations were planned in advance to max-
imize the all-sky survey coverage and efficiency. A number
of observations for a wide variety of astrophysical targets
ranging from solar system objects to galaxies at cosmolog-
ical distances were carried out in the targeted mode. Dur-
ing the cold mission, AKARI made more than 5000 tar-
geted observations, including a small serendipitous survey
of asteroids (Hasegawa et al. 2013), thermal IR photometric
observations of (25143) Itokawa (Muller et al. 2014b) and
(162173) 1999 JU3 (Hasegawa et al. 2008), the targets of
the JAXA Hyabusa and Hyabusa 2 sample return missions
(see Yoshikawa et al. in this volume).
After the exhaustion of AKARI's liquid helium, the tele-
scope and instruments remained at sufficiently low tem-
peratures (below 50 K) owing to the mechanical cooler.
Targeted near-IR observations with the IRC were there-
fore able to be carried out in the AKARI "warm mission"
phase. Low resolution spectroscopy was performed us-
ing the near-IR channel of the IRC from 2 -- 5 µm. The
AKARI warm mission's science observations began in
June 2008 and continued until May 2011.
The IRC
carried out more than 12,000 targeted observations dur-
ing the warm mission, including spectroscopy of 70 as-
teroids. The AKARI data are available at ISAS/JAXA
(http://www.ir.isas.jaxa.jp/AKARI/Observation/).
2.3. WISE/NEOWISE
Launched on December 14, 2009 into a 525 km Sun-
synchronous orbit, the WISE mission surveyed the entire
sky at four infrared wavelengths (3.4, 4.6, 12 and 22 µm;
denoted W1, W2, W3, and W4 respectively) using a 40 cm
telescope (Wright et al. 2010). The survey's scientific ob-
jectives were to find the cool stars and luminous galaxies
using a single operational mode. The survey strategy was
designed for rapid sky coverage resulting in observations of
the entire sky with an average depth of ∼10 exposures on
the ecliptic plane (rising to thousands at the ecliptic poles)
after six months. All four wavelengths were imaged simul-
taneously using beamsplitters. Augmentations to the WISE
science data processing pipeline allowed for archiving of
the individual single-frame exposures as well as mining of
moving objects from the images in real time (Mainzer et al.
2011a). The fully cryogenic baseline mission was com-
pleted in July 2010, and the solid hydrogen cryogen used
to cool the W3 and W4 detectors was partially exhausted
on August 5, 2010, resulting in the loss of the W4 channel.
Operations continued using the W1, W2, and W3 arrays un-
til the cryogen was fully exhausted on September 30, 2010.
The mission continued in a post-cryogenic phase with the
goal of observing near-Earth objects (NEOs; asteroids and
comets with perihelia <1.3 AU) until February 1, 2011 us-
ing the passively cooled W1 and W2 channels. After this,
it was placed into hibernation for 32 months. During all
phases of the prime mission, >158,000 asteroids were de-
tected, including ∼34,000 new discoveries.
The spacecraft was reawakened in August 2013 to begin
an extended mission, known as NEOWISE (for near-Earth
object + WISE), to discover and characterize the NEO pop-
ulation using the 3.4 and 4.6 µm channels, which remain
operational via passive cooling to ∼75 K. Survey opera-
tions resumed on December 21, 2013 and are expected to
continue until early 2017. To date, the spacecraft has ob-
served ∼11,700 minor planets, including 270 NEOs, a rate
of ∼0.7-0.8 NEOs per day (Mainzer et al. 2014).
The WISE observational strategy typically resulted in
∼10-12 observations of most asteroids spaced over ∼36
hours. However,
the short length of the observational
arc means that ground-based follow-up is necessary to se-
cure orbits for new discoveries. The worldwide commu-
nity of professional and amateur observers has contributed
to follow-up for NEOWISE NEO candidate discoveries,
which are typically found with R ∼22 mag. As an all-sky
survey, NEOWISE candidates are frequently found at high
declinations, regardless of weather or lunar phase, posing
unique challenges for follow-up observers.
All data from the WISE prime mission have been pub-
licly released and are available through NASA's Infrared
Science Archive (IRSA; http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/Missions/wise.html).
5
Derived physical properties for minor planets are being pre-
pared for submission to NASA's Planetary Data System;
until then, they are available through the individual NEO-
WISE team publications, i.e. Mainzer et al. (2011d, 2012a);
Mainzer et al. (2014); Mainzer et al. (2014) for the NEOs;
Masiero et al. (2011, 2012a, 2014) for the MBAs; Grav
et al. (2011b, 2012a,b) for the Hilda group and Jovian Tro-
jans; and Bauer et al. (2013) for the scattered disk objects
and Centaur populations. Data from the NEOWISE reac-
tivation will be publicly released annually through IRSA
beginning in March 2015.
2.4. Herschel
The Herschel Space Observatory launched on May 14,
2009, carrying a 3.5 m telescope into orbit around the Earth-
Sun L2 Lagrange point (Pilbratt et al. 2010). Herschel's
telescope was passively cooled, and a dewar containing
∼2370 L of superfluid liquid helium was used to cool its far-
IR instruments, the Photodetector Array Camera and Spec-
trometer (PACS; Poglitsch et al. 2010), the Spectral and
Photometric Imaging REceiver (SPIRE; Griffin et al. 2010),
and the Heterodyne Instrument for the Far Infrared (HIFI;
de Graauw et al. 2010). Owing to its longer wavelengths,
spanning 55 -- 671 µm, Herschel was primarily used to ob-
serve the more distant minor planets (which are cooler and
therefore emit strongly at far-IR) such as trans-Neptunian
and Kuiper Belt objects by the open time key program en-
titled "TNOs are Cool: A survey of the trans-Neptunian re-
gion" (Muller et al. 2010). However, Main Belt asteroids
were used as calibration sources (Muller et al. 2014a), and
measurements of individual targets of interest were made
for ∼10 asteroids (e.g. Leyrat et al. 2012; O'Rourke et al.
2012; Muller et al. 2013, 2014b,c).
Herschel data may be accessed through the Herschel
Science Archive (HSA) maintained by the European Space
Agency (http://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/herschel/science-
archive).
It is also possible to query the HSA through
NASA's Herschel Science Center (http://irsa.ipac.caltech.
edu/applications/Herschel/).
3. Thermal Modeling
Thermal models range in sophistication and complexity;
different models are used depending on data quality, com-
puting resources, and the availability of ancillary data such
as shape models and rotational states. All models begin
by solving the energy balance between incident solar radi-
ation, reflected sunlight, and thermal emission (e.g. Lebof-
sky et al. 1986). For a spherical, airless body, this is given
by
ApS = Lr + Le,
(1)
where Ap is the objects's projected area, S is the solar flux
at the distance of the asteroid, and Lr and Le are the re-
flected and emitted radiation, respectively, and Lr/Le =
A/(1 − A), where A is the bolometric Bond albedo.
In
essence, the purpose of thermal modeling is to determine Le
6
(cid:90) π
(cid:90) π/2
−π
−π/2
(cid:40)
from the observed flux in one direction (or a few directions
for objects observed at multiple viewing geometries), and
one or a few thermally-dominated bandpasses. The extrap-
olation to all directions and the bolometric emitted radiation
are what the model provides. The total thermal emission is
given by
Le = ησR2
T 4(θ, φ)cos(φ)dφdθ,
(2)
where is the emissivity as a function of wavelength, η is
the so-called beaming parameter (described in more detail
below), and σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, R is the
object's radius, and T is the object's temperature distribu-
tion as a function of longitude (θ) and latitude (φ), measured
from the subsolar point.
The Standard Thermal Model (Lebofsky et al. 1986,
and references therein) and the popular Near-Earth Asteroid
Thermal Model (NEATM; Harris 1998) adopt the following
temperature distribution across the asteroid's surface:
T (θ, φ) =
Tsscos1/4ζ
0
if ζ < π/2
if ζ ≥ π/2
(3)
where the angular distance from the subsolar point is ζ and
the temperature at the subsolar point (Tss) is
(cid:20) S(1 − A)
(cid:21)1/4
Tss =
ησ
.
(4)
Since the peak of the Sun's spectral energy distribution
occurs at visible wavelengths, the Bond albedo is customar-
ily assumed to be equal to the total Bond albedo at V band
(∼0.56 µm), Av. In the system of Bowell et al. (1989), the
Bond albedo is related to the more readily measured visible
geometric albedo pV by
A ∼ Av = pV q = pV (0.29 + 0.684G),
(5)
where G is the so-called phase slope parameter that ranges
from ∼-0.1 to 0.4 (Bowell et al. 1989; Harris et al. 1989).
Since pV is generally <1, A is usually (cid:28) 1. We there-
fore have a direct relationship between the asteroid's ther-
mal flux and its diameter D: Le ∝ D2(1 − A) → D2.
However, since the asteroid's reflected sunlight goes as
Lr = ApAS ∝ AD2, diameter and albedo cannot be eas-
ily disentangled if only Lr is measured. This results in a
much larger uncertainty in the derived diameter unless pV is
already known, given the large range of asteroid albedos
(∼0.02 to >0.5; Binzel et al. 2004; Mainzer et al. 2011d;
Masiero et al. 2011).
If only the absolute visible magnitude H of the asteroid
is available, corresponding to its V-band magnitude mea-
sured or extrapolated at α = 0◦ and object-to-observer and
heliocentric distances of 1 au, a frequently-used empirical
relationship for diameter is given by
10−H/5,
D =
(6)
1329√
pV
SUMMARY OF RECENT SPACE-BASED IR ASTEROID OBSERVATIONS AND DISCOVERIES
TABLE 2
Mission
NEOs MBAs
Cybeles Hildas
Jovian Trojans Centaurs
Spitzer
<10
Spitzer Warm Mission ∼600
AKARI
WISE
NEOWISE
Herschel
∼250
0
4806
90
∼700 ∼158,000
∼11600
270
∼7
∼8
1
0
106
1342
100
1
62
0
86
1023
50
0
∼70
0
110
∼2000
50
0
42
28
7
52
1
18
Asteroid
Discoveries
0
0
0
∼34,000
∼100
0
NOTE. -- As of March 2015.
where D is the diameter in km (Bowell et al. 1989; Harris
& Lagerros 2002). This relationship also demonstrates that
diameter derived from visible light observations alone is a
sensitive function of an asteroid's albedo, underscoring the
value of obtaining diameters obtained radiometrically.
Thermal models offer the possibility of deriving physical
properties for large numbers of asteroids, with increasingly
sophisticated models and better data allowing for more and
improved constraints on parameters such as diameter, geo-
metric visible albedo (pV ), infrared albedo (pIR), emissiv-
ity, shape, rotational state, and thermal inertia. The STM
dcorresponds to the case of a non-rotating spherical body,
or one with zero thermal inertia and no night-side emission,
observed at 0◦ solar phase angle. The beaming parameter η,
which takes into account surface roughness and the "beam-
ing" of thermal emission in the direction of the Sun, is often
set to 0.756 in the STM based on empirical fits to the diame-
ters of (1) Ceres and (2) Pallas derived from stellar occulta-
tions. The fast rotating model (FRM; Lebofsky et al. 1978;
Veeder et al. 1989; Lebofsky & Spencer 1989), by contrast,
is more appropriate for an object that rotates rapidly or has
high thermal inertia/high thermal conductivity; effectively,
η is set to π, and the nightside emits flux and does not fol-
low Equation 3. The NEATM assumes a hybrid approach
that still assumes zero contribution from the nightside, but
allows η to be fit as a free parameter if observations from
more than one thermal IR band are available.
NEATM-derived diameters generally reproduce mea-
surements from radar, stellar occultations, and in situ space-
craft visits to within ±10%, given multiple thermally-
dominated IR measurements that adequately sample an
asteroid's rotational light curve with good signal-to-noise
ratio (SNR) and an accurate determination of distance from
knowledge of its orbit (Mainzer et al. 2011c). It is worth
noting that the accuracy of the diameters of objects used
to confirm the performance of radiometric thermal models
(such as radar or stellar occultations) is typically ∼10%.
With these caveats, albedos can be determined to within
±25% of their value (i.e. pV =0.04±0.01) if good-quality
visible light observations are available. The accuracy of
the derived albedo depends critically on the accuracy of
H; see below. If only observations at a single band cen-
tered near 4.6 µm are available (as is the case for some
WISE/NEOWISE and Spitzer targets), diameter errors typ-
ically degrade to ±20 − 25%, and albedos can only be
known to within ±40 − 50% of their value (Mueller et al.
2007; Harris et al. 2011; Mainzer et al. 2012a; Masiero et al.
2012a).
While diameter determinations from thermal IR obser-
vations are relatively insensitive to visible light measure-
ments, the latter are required to determine pV . Obtaining
good-quality H and G measurements (Bowell et al. 1989)
is a persistent difficulty. Most of the time, visible observa-
tions collected simultaneously with IR fluxes are not avail-
able, so the absolute magnitude H and phase curve slope
parameter G must be used to extrapolate the apparent vis-
ible magnitude at the time the IR observations were taken.
Most asteroid observations come from the visible-light sur-
veys that discover them, such as the Catalina Sky Survey,
LINEAR, and PanSTARRS. Typically, discovery observa-
tions are made with broadband V + R band filters to max-
imize sensitivity to NEOs, and while astrometric calibra-
tions can be very accurate, photometric measurements can
be considerably more variable. Moreover, G is known to
vary with asteroid taxonomic type (e.g. Harris & Young
1989). Williams (2012) recomputed H and G values for the
entire Minor Planet Center catalog on a survey-by-survey
basis and found that H offsets peak at +0.4 mag in the
range H=14.2 -- 14.5 mag, but decrease to +0.1 mag for
H > 20 mag, significantly expanding on the work of Pravec
et al. (2012), who measured H values for 583 minor plan-
ets. Williams (2012) recomputed photometric magnitudes
to account for the various surveys' filters. NEOWISE ther-
mal model fits were performed assuming large (±0.3 mag
or more) errors for H if no direct measurements of these
parameters were available (e.g. from Warner et al. 2009;
Pravec et al. 2012) at the time of publication. Future work
will incorporate the Williams (2012) H and G values into
7
thermal models from NEOWISE. If H values are well-
known, albedo can be determined to within 25%, but if H
is poorly known, then the accuracy of the albedo degrades
accordingly.
In bands where reflected sunlight contributes a non-
negligible fraction of the total flux, the albedo at that wave-
length (pIR) must also be treated as a free parameter in ther-
mal models. For NEOs with subsolar temperatures close
to ∼300 K, peak thermal emission occurs near ∼10 µm.
Wavelengths longer than ∼4 µm are typically thermally
dominated for asteroids at heliocentric distances less than
∼4 AU; shorter wavelengths are a mix of reflected sunlight
and thermal emission.
The infrared albedo at ∼3 µm is not necessarily equal
to the visible albedo, and it is correlated with taxonomic
type. The trends for each taxonomic type are (Mainzer et al.
2011d, 2012c):
• pIR/pV ∼1 for C-complex asteroids (except for D-
types)
• pIR/pV ∼1.7 for S-complex asteroids
• pIR/pV ∼2.2 for D-types
• pIR/pV (cid:46)1 for B-types
The differences between pIR/pV for all of these taxonomic
types is likely due to the fact that their VNIR slopes are ei-
ther blue (as is the case for the B-types), flat (C-complex),
red (S-complex), or very red (D-types), and the trend of
these slopes continues out to ∼3µm. Consequently, if pIR
can be determined, it can be used as a proxy for distinguish-
ing between taxonomic types that otherwise have nearly
identical visible albedos (Grav et al. 2012a,b; Al´ı-Lagoa
et al. 2013; Masiero et al. 2014).
While the STM, FRM, and NEATM are useful tools for
rapidly determining effective spherical diameter, pV , and
pIR for large numbers of asteroids, they are of limited use
for determining additional parameters such as emissivity
and thermal inertia. To extract these parameters, thermo-
physical models are needed; see Delb´o et al. (this volume)
for a detailed discussion of their theory and application.
4. Results
Table 2 summarizes the numbers of asteroids that
are known to have been observed to date by Spitzer,
WISE/NEOWISE, AKARI and Herschel for NEOs, Main
Belt asteroids, Jovian Trojans, and Centaurs. Given the
capabilities of each mission's survey data and selection
methods, much can be learned about the properties of the
various asteroid populations.
4.1.
IR-Selected and Optically-Selected Population
Studies.
Samples of asteroids imaged by space-based IR tele-
In an independent
scopes can be selected in two ways.
8
survey, all small body candidates are treated identically re-
gardless of whether they are previously known or might be
new discoveries (assuming the survey's cadence allows for
an observational arc sufficient to enable the discovery of
new moving objects). In a targeted sample, the telescope
observes previously known asteroids and cannot indepen-
dently discover new ones.
In an independent survey, asteroids are selected based on
their IR fluxes, whereas in a targeted survey, asteroids are
drawn from the catalog of objects discovered by other ob-
servers, almost all of whom operate at visible wavelengths.
Understanding the selection biases of the sample is critical
when probing population properties below the size regime
for which the sample is observationally complete.
Since IR flux is insensitive to albedo, IR surveys are less
biased against low albedo objects than surveys that select
targets based on their visible flux alone. Visible light sur-
veys are less likely to discover low albedo objects, particu-
larly at smaller sizes, due to their intrinsic faintness. More-
over, since diameter is determined directly from IR fluxes,
no conversion between H and diameter is needed, elimi-
nating the uncertainty associated with the large range of
possible asteroid albedos. IR-selected samples can be ex-
trapolated to determine the size-frequency distribution of
the underlying population they represent, since the sample
selection method is insensitive to albedo.
The NEOWISE project operated as an independent sur-
vey, using data processing methods to select moving object
objects based on their IR fluxes. Known and new candi-
dates were treated identically by the WISE Moving Object
Processing System (WMOPS), which required all moving
object candidates to be detected a minimum of five times
over ∼15 hours (Mainzer et al. 2011a; Cutri et al. 2012). A
detailed description of WMOPS can be found in the WISE
Explanatory Supplement, section IV.5. Most objects were
observed an average of ∼12 times over ∼36 hours. Over the
course of the year-long prime mission, ∼158,000 asteroids
were detected, including ∼34,000 new discoveries. During
the 8.5-month fully cryogenic portion of the mission, aster-
oids were selected by WMOPS based on their 12 µm flux;
after the cryogen depleted, the primary band for asteroid
selection became the 4.6 µm channel.
One of the main results of the WMOPS-selected sam-
ple was the discovery that asteroid albedo distributions
appear to remain constant over a wide range of diame-
ters. An example of this can be seen in Figure 1, which
compares the albedo-size relationship for a sample of 44
optically-selected Jovian Trojans observed with Spitzer
(Fern´andez et al. 2009) to a sample of 1739 Trojans found
using WMOPS (Grav et al. 2011a). While the optically-
selected sample shows a strong trend of increasing albedo
with decreasing size, no strong trend is apparent in the
IR-selected, albedo-insensitive sample. A similar effect is
observed when the diameter-albedo relationship for NEO
samples is examined (Figure 2; Delb´o et al. 2003; Binzel
et al. 2004; Trilling et al. 2010). For the small NEOs, a real
increase in albedo with decreasing diameter cannot be ruled
out, but because the sample was selected on the basis of its
visible flux, any real trend is entangled with the optical sur-
veys' bias against discovery of small, dark NEOs (Mainzer
et al. 2014). The NEOWISE-discovered NEOs have lower
albedos than those discovered by optical surveys (Figure 3).
Using the IR-selected sample from NEOWISE, survey
biases were estimated in order to determine the orbital prop-
erties, numbers, and physical properties of various asteroid
populations. Survey biases were computed as a function
of orbital and physical properties using the complete sur-
vey pointing list and the sensitivity in each wavelength,
which derives from observations of asteroids with well-
determined orbits; see Mainzer et al. (2011d) and Grav
et al. (2011a) for an expanded description of the debias-
ing methodology as applied to WISE data. The process of
removing the survey bias signatures from the observed sam-
ple is known as debiasing (c.f. Bottke et al. 2002; Jedicke
& Metcalfe 1998; Spahr 1998).
Mainzer et al. (2011d) found that there are ∼20,500±3000
near-Earth asteroids larger than 100 m in diameter, of which
∼25% had been discovered as of 2011. That work verified
that >90% of NEAs larger than 1 km had been discov-
ered, fulfilling the 1998 "Spaceguard" goal given to NASA.
The sub-populations of the NEAs, including potentially
hazardous asteroids (PHAs; asteroids whose minimum or-
bit intersection distances are <0.05 AU and H<22 mag),
were studied by Mainzer et al. (2012b). However, since
WISE measures diameter, rather than H, the authors recom-
mended a change to a diameter-based definition for PHAs
and concluded that there are ∼4700±1500 PHAs larger
than ∼100 m (Mainzer et al. 2012b). Matches to the orbital
element models of Bottke et al. (2002) and Greenstreet &
Gladman (2013) are generally in good agreement. Approx-
imately twice as many PHAs were found occupying orbits
with the lowest inclinations as compared with the model of
Bottke et al. (2002); however, by recomputing the evolu-
tionary models of NEOs with a finer orbital element grid,
Greenstreet & Gladman (2013) found similar results for
the lowest inclination bins. NEOWISE did not effectively
probe the NEA population below 100 m, with the excep-
tion of the optically-selected sample shown in Figure 3.
Debiasing for this sample requires accounting for the op-
tical survey selection effects in addition to the NEOWISE
sample biases, a more complicated undertaking.
Grav et al. (2011b) and Grav et al. (2012a) debiased
the NEOWISE Jovian Trojan and Hilda samples, respec-
tively, facilitating comparison between the leading and trail-
ing Trojan clouds and leading to estimates of their num-
bers, size, and albedo distributions. Infrared observations
have revealed key attributes of the Jovian Trojans, Hildas,
and Cybele asteroids. These results indicate that Trojans
in the leading and trailing clouds are extremely similar in
terms of albedos, taxonomic types, and size distributions;
the major difference is that Trojans in the leading (L4)
cloud outnumber the trailing (L5) by a factor of 1.4±0.2
(Grav et al. 2011a). Theories of early giant planet migration
must account for these observational constraints. Marsset
et al. (2014) obtained visible and near-IR spectra of eight
Jovian Trojans found by WISE and Spitzer to have rela-
tively high albedos and found that these objects had tax-
onomic types consistent with other primitive, low albedo
Trojans. One likely explanation is that when determining
albedos for thousands of objects, normal statistical fluctu-
ations will scatter a small fraction of the observations in
favor of brighter albedos. See Emery et al. (this volume)
for a more comprehensive discussion of the Jovian Trojans.
The Spitzer Space Telescope observed an optically-
selected sample of ∼600 NEOs during its Warm Mission at
3.6 and 4.5 µm (Trilling et al. 2010; Mueller et al. 2011).
Improved diameter constraints assist with assessments of
impact hazard. Targets of interest, such as (101955) Bennu,
the target of the upcoming OSIRIS-REx mission, have also
been observed with Spitzer and Herschel to determine size,
albedo, and thermal inertia (Emery et al. 2014; Yu et al.
2014; Mommert et al. 2014b,a, and Delb´o et al., this vol-
ume). The target of the Hayabusa-2 mission, (162173) 1999
JU3, has been intensively observed with AKARI, Spitzer,
and Herschel, as well as ground-based facilities such as
Subaru (Hasegawa et al. 2008; Mueller et al. 2011). WISE,
Spitzer, and Herschel have been used to study Centaurs,
a transitional population between trans-Neptunian objects
and Jupiter-family comets (Bauer et al. 2013; Duffard et al.
2014). Measurements from IRAS, AKARI, and WISE have
been used to identify NEOs likely to be of cometary ori-
gin by performing follow-up observations of objects with
low albedos and comet-like orbits (Kim et al. 2014). This
work builds on the work of DeMeo & Binzel (2008) and
Fern´andez et al. (2005), who estimated the fraction of NEOs
likely to be of cometary origins as 8% and 4%, respectively.
The albedo-insensitive sample from Mainzer et al.
(2012c) suggests a paucity of NEOs with low albedos at
low perihelion distances, although the sample size is small.
Delb´o et al. (2014) posit that thermal cracking plays a key
role in regolith production, with an erosion and destruction
process that preferentially affects more fragile, low-albedo,
carbonaceous objects as they approach the Sun; see also
Capek & Vokrouhlick´y (2010, 2012).
4.2. Main Belt Asteroid Studies
The Main Belt asteroids (MBAs) have now been exten-
sively studied at thermal IR wavelengths, with >155,000
having been observed by WISE and 4806 objects by
AKARI (Masiero et al. 2011, 2012a; Usui et al. 2011;
Hasegawa et al. 2013). Usui et al. (2014) shows the com-
parison of diameters and albedos derived for the ∼1900
MBAs observed in common between AKARI and WISE.
Diameters between the two datasets match to within ±10%,
and albedos to within ±22%;
these results are in good
agreement with the error bars described above. Figure 4
shows that, as found by IRAS, the asteroids within the
Main Belt become darker with increasing heliocentric dis-
tance (Masiero et al. 2011).
Radiometrically-derived diameters and albedos are valu-
9
able for improving determinations of asteroid collisional
family ages and membership; in most cases, calculations
prior to the recent IR missions described here have relied
on sizes estimated from H and an assumed albedo (c.f.
Marzari et al. 1995). By combining albedos and colors
with orbital information, it is possible to identify probable
family members at velocity limits that would otherwise be
indistinguishable from background objects, assuming that
collisional family members have similar albedos and col-
ors. Furthermore, families that overlap in velocity space
can be disentangled on the basis of their albedos and col-
ors (Masiero et al. 2013; Walsh et al. 2013; Carruba et al.
2013; Milani et al. 2014). With improved and expanded
family membership lists down to smaller sizes, the timing
of collisions can be determined with greater precision, since
the age-determination technique relies upon the strength of
non-gravitational forces such as the Yarkovsky and YORP
effects, which in turn depends on objects' size and mass
(Masiero et al. 2012b). Asteroid collisional families are dis-
cussed in greater depth in Nesvorny et al., Michel et al., and
Masiero et al. in this volume.
Diameters and albedos play a role in understanding
which source reservoirs among the Main Belt asteroids and
comets are most likely to have produced NEOs. While it
is difficult to associate the origins of an individual asteroid
to a specific source region, associations can sometimes be
inferred by comparing source region albedos to the object
of interest and by using diameters to constrain migration
timescales due to non-gravitational forces (e.g. Campins
et al. 2013). Gathering measurements of albedos and diam-
eters for larger numbers of asteroids down to smaller sizes
will facilitate improved understanding of NEO origins and
subsequent evolution, since non-gravitational forces depend
strongly on asteroid sizes (see Vokrouhlicky et al.
in this
volume).
4.3. Taxonomy, Albedo, and Beaming
Albedos and diameters derived from IR observations
have proven useful for studies of the compositional diver-
sity of asteroids throughout the Main Belt. Previous mea-
surements of the asteroids in the main belt suggested a uni-
form, smooth change in composition from more highly re-
flective, stony asteroids closer to the Sun to dark, carbon-
rich objects that were barely altered by solar heating in its
more distant regions. However, data from the WISE mis-
sion and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey have shown that
while there is an overall gradient, the true picture is much
more jumbled, with a wide range of different compositions
scattered throughout the belt. Asteroids rich in minerals
that require high temperatures to form have been found in
the outer belt, while primitive objects are found close to its
inner edge. These results suggest that the early migration
of the giant planets may have turbulently scrambled the as-
teroids and show at the very least that the early solar sys-
tem was more dynamic than previously believed (DeMeo
& Carry 2013, 2014); see also DeMeo et al. (this volume).
10
Comparisons between albedos derived from infrared
data and taxonomic classifications derived from visible and
near-infrared (VNIR) spectroscopy and spectrophotometry
indicate a strong but not universal correlation between tax-
onomic types and albedos (Mainzer et al. 2011b,a; Thomas
et al. 2011). Asteroids with neutral or blue spectra at VNIR
wavelengths tend to have low visible albedos, and most
red objects are associated with higher visible albedos (with
the exception of classes such as D-types, which despite
their red VNIR spectra have low albedos). However, as
described above, even though average pV values may be
nearly identical for some taxonomic types such as C-, P-,
and D-types, their 3 µm albedos (pIR) are distinctly differ-
ent. Therefore, pIR can be used to distinguish between C/P
types and D-types (Grav et al. 2012b) when VNIR spectra
are unavailable. Albedos have been used to identify can-
didate V-type asteroids throughout the Main Belt that have
been subsequently observed spectroscopically to confirm
their taxonomic type (Hardersen et al. 2014). Moreover,
objects with extremely low albedos (pV ∼0.02) in the Main
Belt have been identified as the possible progenitors of the
Tagish Lake meteorite, one of the darkest and most prim-
itive carbonaceous chondrites ever found (Vernazza et al.
2013).
The beaming parameter η has also been shown to cor-
relate with thermal inertia and rotation rate (Harris 1998;
Spencer et al. 1989; Delb´o 2004; Delb´o et al. 2007). How-
ever, caution must be used in the interpretation of beaming
values, since η also correlates with the phase angle at which
an object is observed (Delb´o et al. 2003; Delb´o et al. 2007;
Wolters et al. 2008; Mainzer et al. 2011d). The NEATM as-
sumes a temperature distribution that drops to zero at the
terminator. For rotating bodies with anything other than
low thermal inertias, the temperature distribution is likely
to be non-zero past the terminator; when these bodies are
observed at high phase angle, some portion of the night
side flux is seen, resulting in changes to η to conserve en-
ergy. Moreover, increased surface roughness can increase
the sunward beaming of radiation, and η also depends on
the spin axis orientation with respect to the Sun.
With these caveats, objects with extremely high values
of η are good candidates for high thermal inertias or rapid
rotation rates. Harris & Drube (2014) found 18 NEOs with
high η values (>2) and albedos that may indicate a metallic
composition consistent with the fragmented cores of differ-
entiated bodies. Since high radar albedos can correspond
to high metal content, follow-up radar observations are de-
sirable to confirm their nature. NEOs tend to have higher
η values than MBAs and Jovian Trojans; this may indicate
higher thermal inertia, although they are often observed at
higher phase angles than MBAs (Delb´o et al. 2007; Mainzer
et al. 2011d; Masiero et al. 2011; Grav et al. 2011b). Bauer
et al. (2013) used WISE to perform thermal modeling on
52 Centaurs and scattered disk objects, finding that most η
values were low and similar to those of bare cometary nu-
clei, suggesting a common origin. Observations of 85 trans-
Neptunian objects by Lellouch et al. (2013) showed that
high η values were rare at low heliocentric distances, which
they interpret as evidence of decreasing thermal inertia. The
advent of new mid-IR data from WISE, Spitzer, AKARI,
and Herschel promises to shed further light on thermal in-
ertia trends as thermophysical models are applied to many
more objects (see Delb´o et al., this volume).
4.4. Activated Asteroids and Comets
The boundary between asteroids and comets is now con-
siderably more permeable than previously suspected. Ob-
jects with low albedos and cometary orbits (often telltale
signatures of comets) have stubbornly resisted attempts to
find evidence of cometary activity such as comae or tails,
and asteroids are sometimes revealed upon further inspec-
tion to have become active. Thermal IR imaging surveys
have been used to constrain cometary nucleus sizes dur-
ing periods of inactivity when dust and gas do not obscure
them, allowing for determinations of comet size frequency
distributions (e.g. Bauer et al. 2011; Fern´andez et al. 2013).
Thermal IR imaging can also discover cometary activity
around objects previously thought to be asteroidal. For ex-
ample, WISE observed extended emission around three as-
teroids during its prime mission, which were subsequently
redesignated as comets (237/P LINEAR, 233/P La Sagra,
and P/2009 WX51 Catalina), and Spitzer found evidence
for activity on (3552) Don Quixote (Mommert et al. 2014c).
Since dust emits strongly at thermal IR wavelengths when
comets reach the inner solar system, IR surveys can be used
to discover new comets. IRAS discovered five comets, and
NEOWISE has discovered 24 to date.
Although a detailed discussion of comets is outside the
scope of this book, thermal IR data can also constrain the
sizes and quantities of the dust particles produced by comets
(Bauer et al. 2012a). The slope of the particle size distribu-
tions in turn can be used to determine whether the dust was
produced by a collision between two asteroids or driven off
the surface by volatiles such as CO and CO2, a key signa-
ture of cometary activity. This technique is useful for un-
derstanding the nature of activity observed in some Main
Belt asteroids (Bauer et al. 2012b; Stevenson et al. 2012);
see Jewitt et al. (this volume) for a detailed discussion of
these objects.
4.5. Mid-IR Spectroscopy of Asteroids
A number of key spectral features that vary depending
on a surface's composition, grain size, and porosity can be
observed at mid-IR wavelengths. Laboratory studies of me-
teorites indicate the presence of absorption and emission
features caused by vibrational and lattice modes; for exam-
ple, crystalline and amorphous silicates show broad absorp-
tion features near ∼10 µm.
AKARI, Spitzer, and Herschel all carried spectrographs
operating at mid-IR wavelengths during their fully cryo-
genic mission phases. Spectra have been collected for ∼87
asteroids using the Spitzer IRS and MIPS instruments (e.g.
Cruikshank et al. 2006; Campins et al. 2009a,b; Lim et al.
2011; Marchis et al. 2012). Spitzer IRS spectra covering
5-38 µm revealed broad emission features near 10 and 20
µm on three Jovian Trojans, consistent with the presence of
fine-grained silicates (Emery et al. 2006; Cruikshank 2005).
Similar but smaller emission plateaus were observed be-
tween 9 - 12 µm on 8 Themis-family asteroids and (65)
Cybele, indicating that these bodies may also be covered
with small silicate grains (Licandro et al. 2011, 2012); see
also chapters by Delbo et al. and Emery et al. (this vol-
ume). Moreover, Vernazza et al. (2012) showed that mid-
IR spectra meteorite samples diluted with IR-transparent
KBr powder matched observed emissivity features in Main
Belt asteroids, suggesting that surface porosity can also be
constrained. Marchis et al. (2012) used Spitzer IRS spec-
troscopy of binary asteroids to constrain their bulk densi-
ties, thermal inertia, and surface grain properties. The chap-
ter by Reddy et al. (this volume) provides a more compre-
hensive discussion of mid-IR spectroscopy, including the-
ory and observations.
Mid-IR spectra have also proven useful for constrain-
ing the abundance of volatiles on small bodies; for exam-
ple, many species such as CO and CO2 have been identi-
fied on comets photometrically through excess flux above
their thermal emission (e.g. Bauer et al. 2011; Reach et al.
2013). Recently, Herschel heterodyne spectroscopy of the
largest object in the Main Belt, (1) Ceres, has revealed the
presence of water vapor as the dwarf planet approached per-
ihelion (Kuppers et al. 2014). The water vapor line was de-
tected at three separate epochs at 557 GHz (λ = 540µm),
further illustrating that the distinction between dark aster-
oids and comets is sometimes blurred (Briani et al. 2011).
See Rivkin et al. (this volume) for a discussion of the im-
plications of this result.
4.6. Earth Co-Orbitals
Among the near-Earth objects discovered by NEOWISE
during its post-cryogenic mission is the first known Earth
Trojan, 2010 TK7 and an object in a so-called "horseshoe"
orbit co-orbital with Earth, 2010 SO16 (Connors et al. 2011;
Christou & Asher 2011; Mainzer et al. 2012a). 2010 TK7
was discovered by NEOWISE because its ∼395-year libra-
tion period caused it to move to the region near 90◦ solar
elongation where the satellite continually observes. Be-
cause Earth Trojans are thought to be dynamically con-
strained to remain more than ∼ 24◦ away from Earth in
mean anomaly (Tabachnik & Evans 2000), they spend most
of their time in regions of the sky that are difficult or im-
possible for ground-based telescopes to observe. Infrared
measurements from NEOWISE have provided preliminary
estimates of diameters and albedos (Mainzer et al. 2012a).
2010 TK7 is thought to be temporarily captured by Earth,
with a dynamical stability timescale of ∼7000 years (Con-
nors et al. 2011; Marzari & Scholl 2013). By contrast, 2010
SO16 librates across the L3 Earth-Sun Lagrange point in a
horseshoe pattern that has the longest known stability of any
Earth co-orbital, several hundred thousand years (Christou
11
& Asher 2011).
Although approximately half a dozen horseshoe and
quasi-satellite co-orbitals are known at present, 2010 TK7
remains the sole Earth Trojan found to date. These objects
may represent a much larger population that remains undis-
covered because they spend the majority of their time in the
daytime sky on Earth. Future surveys designed to survey
at low solar elongations may be able to find more of these
unusual objects.
5. Conclusions
Space-based infrared studies of asteroids offer a valuable
means of rapidly determining the physical and orbital prop-
erties of large numbers of objects. Modern detector arrays
have allowed recent space missions to reach background-
limited sensitivities that are orders of magnitude improved
compared to prior generations of IR telescopes. These ca-
pabilities have opened a new window onto the nature of our
solar system's small bodies. Future generations of space-
based IR telescopes using new large-format detectors (e.g.
McMurtry et al. 2013) will further improve our understand-
ing.
6. Acknowledgments.
This study is based on observations with AKARI, a
JAXA project with the participation of ESA. This work is
based in part on observations made with the Spitzer Space
Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Labo-
ratory, California Institute of Technology under a contract
with NASA. This publication makes use of data products
from NEOWISE, which is a project of the Jet Propulsion
Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, funded by
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This
publication makes use of data products from the Wide-
field Infrared Survey Explorer, which is a joint project
of the University of California, Los Angeles, and the Jet
Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology,
funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administra-
tion. Herschel is an ESA space observatory with science
instruments provided by European-led Principal Investiga-
tor consortia and with important participation from NASA.
We gratefully acknowledge the helpful inputs from referees
M. Delbo and A. Harris of DLR.
REFERENCES
Abazajian, K., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Agueros, M. A.,
Allam, S. S., Anderson, S. F., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A.,
Baldry, I. K., Bastian, S., Berlind, A., Bernardi, M.,
Blanton, M. R., Blythe, N., Bochanski, Jr., J. J., Boroski,
W. N., Brewington, H., Briggs, J. W., Brinkmann, J.,
Brunner, R. J., Budav´ari, T., Carey, L. N., Carr, M. A.,
Castander, F. J., Chiu, K., Collinge, M. J., Connolly,
A. J., Covey, K. R., Csabai, I., Dalcanton, J. J., Do-
delson, S., Doi, M., Dong, F., Eisenstein, D. J., Evans,
M. L., Fan, X., Feldman, P. D., Finkbeiner, D. P., Fried-
man, S. D., Frieman, J. A., Fukugita, M., Gal, R. R.,
Gillespie, B., Glazebrook, K., Gonzalez, C. F., Gray, J.,
Grebel, E. K., Grodnicki, L., Gunn, J. E., Gurbani, V. K.,
Hall, P. B., Hao, L., Harbeck, D., Harris, F. H., Harris,
H. C., Harvanek, M., Hawley, S. L., Heckman, T. M.,
Helmboldt, J. F., Hendry, J. S., Hennessy, G. S., Hind-
sley, R. B., Hogg, D. W., Holmgren, D. J., Holtzman,
J. A., Homer, L., Hui, L., Ichikawa, S.-i., Ichikawa, T.,
Inkmann, J. P., Ivezi´c, Z., Jester, S., Johnston, D. E.,
Jordan, B., Jordan, W. P., Jorgensen, A. M., Juri´c, M.,
Kauffmann, G., Kent, S. M., Kleinman, S. J., Knapp,
G. R., Kniazev, A. Y., Kron, R. G., Krzesi´nski, J., Kun-
szt, P. Z., Kuropatkin, N., Lamb, D. Q., Lampeitl, H.,
Laubscher, B. E., Lee, B. C., Leger, R. F., Li, N., Lidz,
A., Lin, H., Loh, Y.-S., Long, D. C., Loveday, J., Lup-
ton, R. H., Malik, T., Margon, B., McGehee, P. M.,
McKay, T. A., Meiksin, A., Miknaitis, G. A., Moor-
thy, B. K., Munn, J. A., Murphy, T., Nakajima, R.,
Narayanan, V. K., Nash, T., Neilsen, Jr., E. H., New-
berg, H. J., Newman, P. R., Nichol, R. C., Nicinski, T.,
Nieto-Santisteban, M., Nitta, A., Odenkirchen, M., Oka-
mura, S., Ostriker, J. P., Owen, R., Padmanabhan, N.,
Peoples, J., Pier, J. R., Pindor, B., Pope, A. C., Quinn,
T. R., Rafikov, R. R., Raymond, S. N., Richards, G. T.,
Richmond, M. W., Rix, H.-W., Rockosi, C. M., Schaye,
J., Schlegel, D. J., Schneider, D. P., Schroeder, J., Scran-
ton, R., Sekiguchi, M., Seljak, U., Sergey, G., Sesar, B.,
Sheldon, E., Shimasaku, K., Siegmund, W. A., Silvestri,
N. M., Sinisgalli, A. J., Sirko, E., Smith, J. A., Smolci´c,
V., Snedden, S. A., Stebbins, A., Steinhardt, C., Stinson,
G., Stoughton, C., Strateva, I. V., Strauss, M. A., Sub-
baRao, M., Szalay, A. S., Szapudi, I., Szkody, P., Tasca,
L., Tegmark, M., Thakar, A. R., Tremonti, C., Tucker,
D. L., Uomoto, A., Vanden Berk, D. E., Vandenberg,
J., Vogeley, M. S., Voges, W., Vogt, N. P., Walkowicz,
L. M., Weinberg, D. H., West, A. A., White, S. D. M.,
Wilhite, B. C., Willman, B., Xu, Y., Yanny, B., Yarger,
J., Yasuda, N., Yip, C.-W., Yocum, D. R., York, D. G.,
Zakamska, N. L., Zehavi, I., Zheng, W., Zibetti, S., &
Zucker, D. B. 2003, Astron. J., 126, 2081
Al´ı-Lagoa, V., de Le´on, J., Licandro, J., Delb´o, M.,
Campins, H., Pinilla-Alonso, N., & Kelley, M. S. 2013,
Astron. Astrophys., 554, A71
Allen, D. A. 1970, Nature, 227, 158
-- . 1971, NASA Special Publication, 267, 41
Bauer, J. M., Grav, T., Blauvelt, E., Mainzer, A. K.,
Masiero, J. R., Stevenson, R., Kramer, E., Fern´andez,
Y. R., Lisse, C. M., Cutri, R. M., Weissman, P. R.,
Dailey, J. W., Masci, F. J., Walker, R., Waszczak, A.,
Nugent, C. R., Meech, K. J., Lucas, A., Pearman, G.,
Wilkins, A., Watkins, J., Kulkarni, S., Wright, E. L.,
WISE Team, & PTF Team. 2013, Astrophys. J., 773, 22
12
Fig. 1. -- Comparison of the IR-selected NEOWISE sample of 1739 Jovian Trojans (filled gray circles; Grav et al. 2011a, 2012b) to
the optically-selected sample observed by Spitzer (light gray squares Fern´andez et al. 2009); the solid and dashed lines give the running
medians for the NEOWISE and Spitzer samples, respectively.
Fig. 2. -- The IR-selected sample of NEOs from NEOWISE (gray points; running median shown as gray line) shows little
change in albedo with diameter, whereas a sample of asteroids selected based on their visible magnitudes (black points and
line) shows an increase in albedo with decreasing diameter (Mainzer et al. 2014).
13
Fig. 3. -- The albedo distribution of the NEOs discovered by WISE during its prime mission (black) has relatively more
low-albedo NEOs than the objects discovered by visible light surveys (dot-dashed line). The albedo distribution for the
entire NEO sample from the WISE prime mission is shown as a finely dashed line.
Fig. 4. -- The albedo distribution for asteroids in the inner (solid line; defined as semi-major axes between 1.8 and 2.5
au), middle (dashed line; 2.5 - 2.82 au), and outer (dotted line; 2.82 < 3.6 au) regions of the Main Belt from Masiero et al.
(2011).
14
Bauer, J. M., Kramer, E., Mainzer, A. K., Stevenson, R.,
Grav, T., Masiero, J. R., Walker, R. G., Fern´andez, Y. R.,
Meech, K. J., Lisse, C. M., Weissman, P. R., Cutri,
R. M., Dailey, J. W., Masci, F. J., Tholen, D. J., Pearman,
G., Wright, E. L., & WISE Team. 2012a, Astrophys. J.,
758, 18
Bauer, J. M., Mainzer, A. K., Grav, T., Walker, R. G.,
Masiero, J. R., Blauvelt, E. K., McMillan, R. S.,
Fern´andez, Y. R., Meech, K. J., Lisse, C. M., Cutri,
R. M., Dailey, J. W., Tholen, D. J., Riesen, T., Ur-
ban, L., Khayat, A., Pearman, G., Scotti, J. V., Kramer,
E., Cherry, D., Gautier, T., Gomillion, S., Watkins, J.,
Wright, E. L., & WISE Team. 2012b, Astrophys. J., 747,
49
Bauer, J. M., Walker, R. G., Mainzer, A. K., Masiero, J. R.,
Grav, T., Dailey, J. W., McMillan, R. S., Lisse, C. M.,
Fern´andez, Y. R., Meech, K. J., Pittichova, J., Blauvelt,
E. K., Masci, F. J., A'Hearn, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Scotti,
J. V., Tholen, D. J., DeBaun, E., Wilkins, A., Hand, E.,
Wright, E. L., & WISE Team. 2011, Astrophys. J., 738,
171
Binzel, R. P., Rivkin, A. S., Stuart, J. S., Harris, A. W., Bus,
S. J., & Burbine, T. H. 2004, Icarus, 170, 259
Bottke, W. F., Durda, D. D., Nesvorn´y, D., Jedicke, R.,
Morbidelli, A., Vokrouhlick´y, D., & Levison, H. 2005,
Icarus, 175, 111
Bottke, W. F., Morbidelli, A., Jedicke, R., Petit, J.-M., Lev-
ison, H. F., Michel, P., & Metcalfe, T. S. 2002, Icarus,
156, 399
Bowell, E., Hapke, B., Domingue, D., Lumme, K., Pel-
toniemi, J., & Harris, A. W. 1989, in Asteroids II, ed.
R. P. Binzel, T. Gehrels, & M. S. Matthews, 524 -- 556
Briani, G., Morbidelli, A., Gounelle, M., & Nesvorn´y, D.
2011, Meteoritics and Planetary Science, 46, 1863
Bus, S. J. & Binzel, R. P. 2002, Icarus, 158, 146
Campins, H., de Le´on, J., Morbidelli, A., Licandro, J.,
Gayon-Markt, J., Delbo, M., & Michel, P. 2013, Astron.
J., 146, 26
Campins, H., Emery, J. P., Kelley, M., Fern´andez, Y., Li-
candro, J., Delb´o, M., Barucci, A., & Dotto, E. 2009a,
Astron. Astrophys., 503, L17
Campins, H., Kelley, M. S., Fern´andez, Y., Licandro, J., &
Hargrove, K. 2009b, Earth Moon and Planets, 105, 159
Capek, D. & Vokrouhlick´y, D. 2010, Astronomy and As-
trophysics, 519, A75
-- . 2012, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 539, A25
Capria, M. T., Tosi, F., De Sanctis, M. C., Capaccioni,
F., Ammannito, E., Frigeri, A., Zambon, F., Fonte, S.,
Palomba, E., Turrini, D., Titus, T. N., Schroder, S. E.,
Toplis, M., Li, J.-Y., Combe, J.-P., Raymond, C. A., &
Russell, C. T. 2014, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 1438
Carruba, V., Domingos, R. C., Nesvorn´y, D., Roig, F., Hua-
man, M. E., & Souami, D. 2013, Mon. Not. R. Astron.
Soc., 433, 2075
Carvano, J. M., Hasselmann, P. H., Lazzaro, D., & Moth´e-
Diniz, T. 2010, Astron. Astrophys., 510, A43
Christou, A. A. & Asher, D. J. 2011, Mon. Not. R. Astron.
Soc., 414, 2965
Connors, M., Wiegert, P., & Veillet, C. 2011, Nature, 475,
481
Cruikshank, D. P. 1977, Icarus, 30, 224
-- . 2005, Advances in Space Research, 36, 1070
Cruikshank, D. P., Stansberry, J. A., Emery, J. P., van Cleve,
J., Fern´andez, Y. R., Werner, M. W., Reike, G. H., &
Trilling, D. E. 2006, in Astronomical Society of the Pa-
cific Conference Series, Vol. 357, Astronomical Society
of the Pacific Conference Series, ed. L. Armus & W. T.
Reach, 23
Cutri, R. M., Wright, E. L., Conrow, T., Bauer, J., Benford,
D., Brandenburg, H., Dailey, J., Eisenhardt, P. R. M.,
Evans, T., Fajardo-Acosta, S., Fowler, J., Gelino, C.,
Grillmair, C., Harbut, M., Hoffman, D., Jarrett, T., Kirk-
patrick, J. D., Leisawitz, D., Liu, W., Mainzer, A.,
Marsh, K., Masci, F., McCallon, H., Padgett, D., Ressler,
M. E., Royer, D., Skrutskie, M. F., Stanford, S. A., Wy-
att, P. L., Tholen, D., Tsai, C. W., Wachter, S., Whee-
lock, S. L., Yan, L., Alles, R., Beck, R., Grav, T.,
Masiero, J., McCollum, B., McGehee, P., Papin, M., &
Wittman, M. 2012, 1
de Graauw, T., Helmich, F. P., Phillips, T. G., Stutzki, J.,
Caux, E., Whyborn, N. D., Dieleman, P., Roelfsema,
P. R., Aarts, H., Assendorp, R., Bachiller, R., Baech-
told, W., Barcia, A., Beintema, D. A., Belitsky, V., Benz,
A. O., Bieber, R., Boogert, A., Borys, C., Bumble, B.,
Caıs, P., Caris, M., Cerulli-Irelli, P., Chattopadhyay,
G., Cherednichenko, S., Ciechanowicz, M., Coeur-Joly,
O., Comito, C., Cros, A., de Jonge, A., de Lange, G.,
Delforges, B., Delorme, Y., den Boggende, T., Desbat,
J.-M., Diez-Gonz´alez, C., di Giorgio, A. M., Dubbel-
dam, L., Edwards, K., Eggens, M., Erickson, N., Ev-
ers, J., Fich, M., Finn, T., Franke, B., Gaier, T., Gal, C.,
Gao, J. R., Gallego, J.-D., Gauffre, S., Gill, J. J., Glenz,
S., Golstein, H., Goulooze, H., Gunsing, T., Gusten,
R., Hartogh, P., Hatch, W. A., Higgins, R., Honingh,
E. C., Huisman, R., Jackson, B. D., Jacobs, H., Ja-
cobs, K., Jarchow, C., Javadi, H., Jellema, W., Justen,
M., Karpov, A., Kasemann, C., Kawamura, J., Keizer,
15
G., Kester, D., Klapwijk, T. M., Klein, T., Kollberg, E.,
Kooi, J., Kooiman, P.-P., Kopf, B., Krause, M., Krieg, J.-
M., Kramer, C., Kruizenga, B., Kuhn, T., Laauwen, W.,
Lai, R., Larsson, B., Leduc, H. G., Leinz, C., Lin, R. H.,
Liseau, R., Liu, G. S., Loose, A., L´opez-Fernandez,
I., Lord, S., Luinge, W., Marston, A., Mart´ın-Pintado,
J., Maestrini, A., Maiwald, F. W., McCoey, C., Mehdi,
I., Megej, A., Melchior, M., Meinsma, L., Merkel, H.,
Michalska, M., Monstein, C., Moratschke, D., Morris,
P., Muller, H., Murphy, J. A., Naber, A., Natale, E.,
Nowosielski, W., Nuzzolo, F., Olberg, M., Olbrich, M.,
Orfei, R., Orleanski, P., Ossenkopf, V., Peacock, T.,
Pearson, J. C., Peron, I., Phillip-May, S., Piazzo, L.,
Planesas, P., Rataj, M., Ravera, L., Risacher, C., Salez,
M., Samoska, L. A., Saraceno, P., Schieder, R., Schlecht,
E., Schloder, F., Schmulling, F., Schultz, M., Schuster,
K., Siebertz, O., Smit, H., Szczerba, R., Shipman, R.,
Steinmetz, E., Stern, J. A., Stokroos, M., Teipen, R.,
Teyssier, D., Tils, T., Trappe, N., van Baaren, C., van
Leeuwen, B.-J., van de Stadt, H., Visser, H., Wildeman,
K. J., Wafelbakker, C. K., Ward, J. S., Wesselius, P.,
Wild, W., Wulff, S., Wunsch, H.-J., Tielens, X., Zaal,
P., Zirath, H., Zmuidzinas, J., & Zwart, F. 2010, Astron.
Astrophys., 518, L6
Delb´o, M. 2004, PhD thesis, Freie UniversitŁt Berlin
Delb´o, M., Dell'Oro, A., Harris, A. W., Mottola, S., &
Mueller, M. 2007, Icarus, 190, 236
Delb´o, M., Harris, A. W., Binzel, R. P., Pravec, P., &
Davies, J. K. 2003, Icarus, 166, 116
Delb´o, M., Libourel, G., Wilkerson, J., Murdoch, N.,
Michel, P., Ramesh, R., Ganino, C., Verati, C., &
Marchi, S. 2014, Nature, 508, 233
Delb´o, M., Walsh, K., Mueller, M., Harris, A. W., & How-
ell, E. S. 2011, Icarus, 212, 138
DeMeo, F. & Binzel, R. P. 2008, Icarus, 194, 436
DeMeo, F. E., Binzel, R. P., Slivan, S. M., & Bus, S. J. 2009,
Icarus, 202, 160
DeMeo, F. E. & Carry, B. 2013, Icarus, 226, 723
-- . 2014, Nature, 505, 629
Dotto, E., Barucci, M. A., Muller, T. G., Storrs, A. D., &
Tanga, P. 2002, Asteroids III, 219
Duffard, R., Pinilla-Alonso, N., Santos-Sanz, P., Vilenius,
E., Ortiz, J. L., Mueller, T., Fornasier, S., Lellouch, E.,
Mommert, M., Pal, A., Kiss, C., Mueller, M., Stansberry,
J., Delsanti, A., Peixinho, N., & Trilling, D. 2014, As-
tron. Astrophys., 564, A92
Durech, J., Sidorin, V., & Kaasalainen, M. 2010, Astron.
Astrophys., 513, A46
Emery, J. P., Cruikshank, D. P., & Van Cleve, J. 2006,
Icarus, 182, 496
Emery, J. P., Fern´andez, Y. R., Kelley, M. S. P., Warden (n`ee
Crane), K. T., Hergenrother, C., Lauretta, D. S., Drake,
M. J., Campins, H., & Ziffer, J. 2014, Icarus, 234, 17
Fazio, G. G., Hora, J. L., Allen, L. E., Ashby, M. L. N.,
Barmby, P., Deutsch, L. K., Huang, J.-S., Kleiner, S.,
Marengo, M., Megeath, S. T., Melnick, G. J., Pahre,
M. A., Patten, B. M., Polizotti, J., Smith, H. A., Tay-
lor, R. S., Wang, Z., Willner, S. P., Hoffmann, W. F.,
Pipher, J. L., Forrest, W. J., McMurty, C. W., McCreight,
C. R., McKelvey, M. E., McMurray, R. E., Koch, D. G.,
Moseley, S. H., Arendt, R. G., Mentzell, J. E., Marx,
C. T., Losch, P., Mayman, P., Eichhorn, W., Krebs,
D., Jhabvala, M., Gezari, D. Y., Fixsen, D. J., Flo-
res, J., Shakoorzadeh, K., Jungo, R., Hakun, C., Work-
man, L., Karpati, G., Kichak, R., Whitley, R., Mann,
S., Tollestrup, E. V., Eisenhardt, P., Stern, D., Gorjian,
V., Bhattacharya, B., Carey, S., Nelson, B. O., Glaccum,
W. J., Lacy, M., Lowrance, P. J., Laine, S., Reach, W. T.,
Stauffer, J. A., Surace, J. A., Wilson, G., Wright, E. L.,
Hoffman, A., Domingo, G., & Cohen, M. 2004, Astro-
phys. J. Suppl., 154, 10
Fern´andez, Y. R., Jewitt, D., & Ziffer, J. E. 2009, Astron. J.,
138, 240
Fern´andez, Y. R., Jewitt, D. C., & Sheppard, S. S. 2005,
Astron. J., 130, 308
Fern´andez, Y. R., Kelley, M. S., Lamy, P. L., Toth, I.,
Groussin, O., Lisse, C. M., A'Hearn, M. F., Bauer, J. M.,
Campins, H., Fitzsimmons, A., Licandro, J., Lowry,
S. C., Meech, K. J., Pittichov´a, J., Reach, W. T., Snod-
grass, C., & Weaver, H. A. 2013, Icarus, 226, 1138
Gil-Hutton, R. & Canada-Assandri, M. 2012, Astron. Astro-
phys., 539, A115
Grav, T., Jedicke, R., Denneau, L., Chesley, S.,
Spahr, T. B. 2011a, PASP, 123, 423
, M. J., &
Grav, T., Mainzer, A. K., Bauer, J., Masiero, J., Spahr,
T., McMillan, R. S., Walker, R., Cutri, R., Wright, E.,
Eisenhardt, P. R., Blauvelt, E., DeBaun, E., Elsbury,
D., Gautier, T., Gomillion, S., Hand, E., & Wilkins, A.
2012a, Astrophys. J., 744, 197
Grav, T., Mainzer, A. K., Bauer, J., Masiero, J., Spahr,
T., McMillan, R. S., Walker, R., Cutri, R., Wright, E.,
Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Blauvelt, E., DeBaun, E., Elsbury,
D., Gautier, IV, T., Gomillion, S., Hand, E., & Wilkins,
A. 2011b, Astrophys. J., 742, 40
Grav, T., Mainzer, A. K., Bauer, J. M., Masiero, J. R., &
Nugent, C. R. 2012b, Astrophys. J., 759, 49
Green, S. F., Meadows, A. J., & Davies, J. K. 1985, Mon.
Not. R. Astron. Soc., 214, 29P
16
Greenstreet, S. & Gladman, B. 2013, Astrophys. J. Lett.,
767, L18
Griffin, M. J., Abergel, A., Abreu, A., Ade, P. A. R.,
Andr´e, P., Augueres, J.-L., Babbedge, T., Bae, Y., Bail-
lie, T., Baluteau, J.-P., Barlow, M. J., Bendo, G., Benielli,
D., Bock, J. J., Bonhomme, P., Brisbin, D., Brockley-
Blatt, C., Caldwell, M., Cara, C., Castro-Rodriguez, N.,
Cerulli, R., Chanial, P., Chen, S., Clark, E., Clements,
D. L., Clerc, L., Coker, J., Communal, D., Conversi, L.,
Cox, P., Crumb, D., Cunningham, C., Daly, F., Davis,
G. R., de Antoni, P., Delderfield, J., Devin, N., di Gior-
gio, A., Didschuns, I., Dohlen, K., Donati, M., Dow-
ell, A., Dowell, C. D., Duband, L., Dumaye, L., Emery,
R. J., Ferlet, M., Ferrand, D., Fontignie, J., Fox, M.,
Franceschini, A., Frerking, M., Fulton, T., Garcia, J.,
Gastaud, R., Gear, W. K., Glenn, J., Goizel, A., Griffin,
D. K., Grundy, T., Guest, S., Guillemet, L., Hargrave,
P. C., Harwit, M., Hastings, P., Hatziminaoglou, E., Her-
man, M., Hinde, B., Hristov, V., Huang, M., Imhof, P.,
Isaak, K. J., Israelsson, U., Ivison, R. J., Jennings, D.,
Kiernan, B., King, K. J., Lange, A. E., Latter, W., Lau-
rent, G., Laurent, P., Leeks, S. J., Lellouch, E., Lev-
enson, L., Li, B., Li, J., Lilienthal, J., Lim, T., Liu,
S. J., Lu, N., Madden, S., Mainetti, G., Marliani, P.,
McKay, D., Mercier, K., Molinari, S., Morris, H., Mose-
ley, H., Mulder, J., Mur, M., Naylor, D. A., Nguyen,
H., O'Halloran, B., Oliver, S., Olofsson, G., Olofsson,
H.-G., Orfei, R., Page, M. J., Pain, I., Panuzzo, P., Pa-
pageorgiou, A., Parks, G., Parr-Burman, P., Pearce, A.,
Pearson, C., P´erez-Fournon, I., Pinsard, F., Pisano, G.,
Podosek, J., Pohlen, M., Polehampton, E. T., Pouliquen,
D., Rigopoulou, D., Rizzo, D., Roseboom, I. G., Rous-
sel, H., Rowan-Robinson, M., Rownd, B., Saraceno,
P., Sauvage, M., Savage, R., Savini, G., Sawyer, E.,
Scharmberg, C., Schmitt, D., Schneider, N., Schulz, B.,
Schwartz, A., Shafer, R., Shupe, D. L., Sibthorpe, B.,
Sidher, S., Smith, A., Smith, A. J., Smith, D., Spencer,
L., Stobie, B., Sudiwala, R., Sukhatme, K., Surace, C.,
Stevens, J. A., Swinyard, B. M., Trichas, M., Tourette,
T., Triou, H., Tseng, S., Tucker, C., Turner, A., Vaccari,
M., Valtchanov, I., Vigroux, L., Virique, E., Voellmer,
G., Walker, H., Ward, R., Waskett, T., Weilert, M., Wes-
son, R., White, G. J., Whitehouse, N., Wilson, C. D.,
Winter, B., Woodcraft, A. L., Wright, G. S., Xu, C. K.,
Zavagno, A., Zemcov, M., Zhang, L., & Zonca, E. 2010,
Astron. Astrophys., 518, L3
Hansen, O. L. 1976, Astron. J., 81, 74
Hardersen, P. S., Reddy, V., Roberts, R., & Mainzer, A.
2014, ArXiv e-prints
Harris, A. W. 1998, Icarus, 131, 291
Harris, A. W. & Drube, L. 2014, Astrophys. J. Lett., 785, L4
Harris, A. W. & Lagerros, J. S. V. 2002, Asteroids III, 205
Harris, A. W., Mommert, M., Hora, J. L., Mueller, M.,
Trilling, D. E., Bhattacharya, B., Bottke, W. F., Chesley,
S., Delbo, M., Emery, J. P., Fazio, G., Mainzer, A., Pen-
prase, B., Smith, H. A., Spahr, T. B., Stansberry, J. A.,
& Thomas, C. A. 2011, Astron. J., 141, 75
Harris, A. W. & Young, J. W. 1989, Icarus, 81, 314
Harris, A. W., Young, J. W., Contreiras, L., Dockweiler, T.,
Belkora, L., Salo, H., Harris, W. D., Bowell, E., Pouta-
nen, M., Binzel, R. P., Tholen, D. J., & Wang, S. 1989,
Icarus, 81, 365
Hasegawa, S., Muller, T. G., Kawakami, K., Kasuga, T.,
Wada, T., Ita, Y., Takato, N., Terada, H., Fujiyoshi, T., &
Abe, M. 2008, PASJ, 60, 399
Hasegawa, S., Muller, T. G., Kuroda, D., Takita, S., & Usui,
F. 2013, PASJ, 65, 34
Houck, J. R., Roellig, T. L., van Cleve, J., Forrest, W. J.,
Herter, T., Lawrence, C. R., Matthews, K., Reitsema,
H. J., Soifer, B. T., Watson, D. M., Weedman, D., Huis-
jen, M., Troeltzsch, J., Barry, D. J., Bernard-Salas, J.,
Blacken, C. E., Brandl, B. R., Charmandaris, V., De-
vost, D., Gull, G. E., Hall, P., Henderson, C. P., Hig-
don, S. J. U., Pirger, B. E., Schoenwald, J., Sloan, G. C.,
Uchida, K. I., Appleton, P. N., Armus, L., Burgdorf,
M. J., Fajardo-Acosta, S. B., Grillmair, C. J., Ingalls,
J. G., Morris, P. W., & Teplitz, H. I. 2004, Astrophys. J.
Suppl., 154, 18
Ishihara, D., Onaka, T., Kataza, H., Salama, A., Alfageme,
C., Cassatella, A., Cox, N., Garc´ıa-Lario, P., Stephenson,
C., Cohen, M., Fujishiro, N., Fujiwara, H., Hasegawa,
S., Ita, Y., Kim, W., Matsuhara, H., Murakami, H.,
Muller, T. G., Nakagawa, T., Ohyama, Y., Oyabu, S.,
Pyo, J., Sakon, I., Shibai, H., Takita, S., Tanab´e, T.,
Uemizu, K., Ueno, M., Usui, F., Wada, T., Watarai, H.,
Yamamura, I., & Yamauchi, C. 2010, Astron. Astrophys.,
514, A1
Jedicke, R. & Metcalfe, T. S. 1998, Icarus, 131, 245
Kaasalainen, M., Torppa, J., & Muinonen, K. 2001, Icarus,
153, 37
Kawada, M., Baba, H., Barthel, P. D., Clements, D., Co-
hen, M., Doi, Y., Figueredo, E., Fujiwara, M., Goto, T.,
Hasegawa, S., Hibi, Y., Hirao, T., Hiromoto, N., Jeong,
W.-S., Kaneda, H., Kawai, T., Kawamura, A., Kester, D.,
Kii, T., Kobayashi, H., Kwon, S. M., Lee, H. M., Mak-
iuti, S., Matsuo, H., Matsuura, S., Muller, T. G., Mu-
rakami, N., Nagata, H., Nakagawa, T., Narita, M., Noda,
M., Oh, S. H., Okada, Y., Okuda, H., Oliver, S., Ootsubo,
T., Pak, S., Park, Y.-S., Pearson, C. P., Rowan-Robinson,
M., Saito, T., Salama, A., Sato, S., Savage, R. S., Ser-
jeant, S., Shibai, H., Shirahata, M., Sohn, J., Suzuki, T.,
Takagi, T., Takahashi, H., Thomson, M., Usui, F., Ver-
dugo, E., Watabe, T., White, G. J., Wang, L., Yamamura,
I., Yamauchi, C., & Yasuda, A. 2007, PASJ, 59, 389
17
Keihm, S., Tosi, F., Kamp, L., Capaccioni, F., Gulkis, S.,
Grassi, D., Hofstadter, M., Filacchione, G., Lee, S.,
Giuppi, S., Janssen, M., & Capria, M. 2012, Icarus, 221,
395
Kessler, M. F., Steinz, J. A., Anderegg, M. E., Clavel, J.,
Drechsel, G., Estaria, P., Faelker, J., Riedinger, J. R.,
Robson, A., Taylor, B. G., & Xim´enez de Ferr´an, S.
1996, Astron. Astrophys., 315, L27
Kim, Y., Ishiguro, M., & Usui, F. 2014, Astrophys. J., 789,
151
Kuppers, M., O'Rourke, L., Bockel´ee-Morvan, D., Za-
kharov, V., Lee, S., von Allmen, P., Carry, B., Teyssier,
D., Marston, A., Muller, T., Crovisier, J., Barucci, M. A.,
& Moreno, R. 2014, Nature, 505, 525
Kuroda, D., Ishiguro, M., Takato, N., Hasegawa, S., Abe,
M., Tsuda, Y., Sugita, S., Usui, F., Hattori, T., Iwata, I.,
Imanishi, M., Terada, H., Choi, Y.-J., Watanabe, S.-i., &
Yoshikawa, M. 2014, PASJ, 66, 51
Lebofsky, L. A. & Spencer, J. R. 1989, in Asteroids II, ed.
R. P. Binzel, T. Gehrels, & M. S. Matthews, 128 -- 147
Lebofsky, L. A., Sykes, M. V., Tedesco, E. F., Veeder, G. J.,
Matson, D. L., Brown, R. H., Gradie, J. C., Feierberg,
M. A., & Rudy, R. J. 1986, Icarus, 68, 239
Lebofsky, L. A., Veeder, G. J., Lebofsky, M. J., & Matson,
D. L. 1978, Icarus, 35, 336
Lellouch, E., Santos-Sanz, P., Lacerda, P., Mommert, M.,
Duffard, R., Ortiz, J. L., Muller, T. G., Fornasier, S.,
Stansberry, J., Kiss, C., Vilenius, E., Mueller, M., Peix-
inho, N., Moreno, R., Groussin, O., Delsanti, A., & Har-
ris, A. W. 2013, Astron. Astrophys., 557, A60
Leyrat, C., Barucci, A., Mueller, T., O'Rourke, L.,
Valtchanov, I., & Fornasier, S. 2012, Astron. Astrophys.,
539, A154
Leyrat, C., Coradini, A., Erard, S., Capaccioni, F., Capria,
M. T., Drossart, P., de Sanctis, M. C., Tosi, F., & Virtis
Team. 2011, Astron. Astrophys., 531, A168
Licandro, J., Campins, H., Kelley, M., Hargrove, K.,
Pinilla-Alonso, N., Cruikshank, D., Rivkin, A. S., &
Emery, J. 2011, Astron. Astrophys., 525, A34
Licandro, J., Hargrove, K., Kelley, M., Campins, H., Zif-
fer, J., Al´ı-Lagoa, V., Fern´andez, Y., & Rivkin, A. 2012,
Astron. Astrophys., 537, A73
Lim, L. F., Emery, J. P., & Moskovitz, N. A. 2011, Icarus,
213, 510
Lupishko, D. F. & Vasilyev, S. V. 2012, NASA Planetary
Data System, 184
Mainzer, A., Bauer, J., Cutri, R. M., Grav, T., Masiero, J.,
Beck, R., Clarkson, P., Conrow, T., Dailey, J., Eisen-
hardt, P., Fabinsky, B., Fajardo-Acosta, S., Fowler, J.,
Gelino, C., Grillmair, C., Heinrichsen, I., Kendall, M.,
Kirkpatrick, J. D., Liu, F., Masci, F., McCallon, H., Nu-
gent, C. R., Papin, M., Rice, E., Royer, D., Ryan, T.,
Sevilla, P., Sonnett, S., Stevenson, R., Thompson, D. B.,
Wheelock, S., Wiemer, D., Wittman, M., Wright, E., &
Yan, L. 2014, ArXiv e-prints
Mainzer, A., Bauer, J., Grav, T., Masiero, J., Cutri, R. M.,
Dailey, J., Eisenhardt, P., McMillan, R. S., Wright, E.,
Walker, R., Jedicke, R., Spahr, T., Tholen, D., Alles,
R., Beck, R., Brandenburg, H., Conrow, T., Evans, T.,
Fowler, J., Jarrett, T., Marsh, K., Masci, F., McCallon,
H., Wheelock, S., Wittman, M., Wyatt, P., DeBaun, E.,
Elliott, G., Elsbury, D., Gautier, IV, T., Gomillion, S.,
Leisawitz, D., Maleszewski, C., Micheli, M., & Wilkins,
A. 2011a, Astrophys. J., 731, 53
Mainzer, A., Bauer, J., Grav, T., Masiero, J., Cutri, R. M.,
Wright, E., Nugent, C. R., Stevenson, R., Clyne, E.,
Cukrov, G., & Masci, F. 2014, The Astrophysical Jour-
nal, 784, 110
Mainzer, A., Grav, T., Bauer, J., Masiero, J., McMillan,
R. S., Cutri, R. M., Walker, R., Wright, E., Eisenhardt,
P., Tholen, D. J., Spahr, T., Jedicke, R., Denneau, L.,
DeBaun, E., Elsbury, D., Gautier, T., Gomillion, S.,
Hand, E., Mo, W., Watkins, J., Wilkins, A., Bryngelson,
G. L., Del Pino Molina, A., Desai, S., G´omez Camus,
M., Hidalgo, S. L., Konstantopoulos, I., Larsen, J. A.,
Maleszewski, C., Malkan, M. A., Mauduit, J.-C., Mul-
lan, B. L., Olszewski, E. W., Pforr, J., Saro, A., Scotti,
J. V., & Wasserman, L. H. 2011b, Astrophys. J., 743, 156
Mainzer, A., Grav, T., Masiero, J., Bauer, J., Cutri, R. M.,
McMillan, R. S., Nugent, C. R., Tholen, D., Walker, R.,
& Wright, E. L. 2012a, Astrophys. J. Lett., 760, L12
Mainzer, A., Grav, T., Masiero, J., Bauer, J., McMillan,
R. S., Giorgini, J., Spahr, T., Cutri, R. M., Tholen, D. J.,
Jedicke, R., Walker, R., Wright, E., & Nugent, C. R.
2012b, Astrophys. J., 752, 110
Mainzer, A., Grav, T., Masiero, J., Bauer, J., Wright, E.,
Cutri, R. M., McMillan, R. S., Cohen, M., Ressler, M.,
& Eisenhardt, P. 2011c, Astrophys. J., 736, 100
Mainzer, A., Grav, T., Masiero, J., Hand, E., Bauer, J.,
Tholen, D., McMillan, R. S., Spahr, T., Cutri, R. M.,
Wright, E., Watkins, J., Mo, W., & Maleszewski, C.
2011d, Astrophys. J., 741, 90
Mainzer, A., Masiero, J., Grav, T., Bauer, J., Tholen,
D. J., McMillan, R. S., Wright, E., Spahr, T., Cutri,
R. M., Walker, R., Mo, W., Watkins, J., Hand, E., &
Maleszewski, C. 2012c, Astrophys. J., 745, 7
18
Mainzer, A. K., Eisenhardt, P., Wright, E. L., Liu, F.-C.,
Irace, W., Heinrichsen, I., Cutri, R., & Duval, V. 2005,
in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
(SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 5899, UV/Optical/IR
Space Telescopes:
Innovative Technologies and Con-
cepts II, ed. H. A. MacEwen, 262 -- 273
Marchis, F., Enriquez, J. E., Emery, J. P., Mueller, M.,
Baek, M., Pollock, J., Assafin, M., Vieira Martins, R.,
Berthier, J., Vachier, F., Cruikshank, D. P., Lim, L. F.,
Reichart, D. E., Ivarsen, K. M., Haislip, J. B., & La-
Cluyze, A. P. 2012, Icarus, 221, 1130
Marsset, M., Vernazza, P., Gourgeot, F., Dumas, C., Birlan,
M., Lamy, P., & Binzel, R. P. 2014, Astron. Astrophys.,
568, L7
Marzari, F., Davis, D., & Vanzani, V. 1995, Icarus, 113, 168
Marzari, F. & Scholl, H. 2013, Celestial Mechanics and Dy-
namical Astronomy, 117, 91
Masiero, J. R., Grav, T., Mainzer, A. K., Nugent, C. R.,
Bauer, J. M., Stevenson, R., & Sonnett, S. 2014, Astro-
phys. J., 791, 121
Masiero, J. R., Mainzer, A. K., Bauer, J. M., Grav, T., Nu-
gent, C. R., & Stevenson, R. 2013, Astrophys. J., 770,
7
Masiero, J. R., Mainzer, A. K., Grav, T., Bauer, J. M., Cutri,
R. M., Dailey, J., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., McMillan, R. S.,
Spahr, T. B., Skrutskie, M. F., Tholen, D., Walker, R. G.,
Wright, E. L., DeBaun, E., Elsbury, D., Gautier, IV, T.,
Gomillion, S., & Wilkins, A. 2011, Astrophys. J., 741,
68
Masiero, J. R., Mainzer, A. K., Grav, T., Bauer, J. M., Cutri,
R. M., Nugent, C., & Cabrera, M. S. 2012a, Astrophys.
J. Lett., 759, L8
Masiero, J. R., Mainzer, A. K., Grav, T., Bauer, J. M., &
Jedicke, R. 2012b, Astrophys. J., 759, 14
Matson, D. L. 1971, NASA Special Publication, 267, 45
Matson, D. L., Veeder, G. J., Tedesco, E. F., & Lebofsky,
L. A. 1989, in Asteroids II, ed. R. P. Binzel, T. Gehrels,
& M. S. Matthews, 269 -- 281
Matter, A., Delbo, M., Ligori, S., Crouzet, N., & Tanga, P.
2011, Icarus, 215, 47
McMurtry, C., Lee, D., Beletic, J., Chen, C.-Y. A., Demers,
R. T., Dorn, M., Edwall, D., Fazar, C. B., Forrest, W. J.,
Liu, F., Mainzer, A. K., Pipher, J. L., & Yulius, A. 2013,
Optical Engineering, 52, 091804
Milani, A., Cellino, A., Knezevi´c, Z., Novakovi´c, B., Spoto,
F., & Paolicchi, P. 2014, Icarus, 239, 46
Mill, J. D., O'Neil, R. R., Price, S., Romick, G. J., Uy,
O. M., Gaposchkin, E. M., Light, G. C., Moore, Jr.,
W. W., Murdock, T. L., & Stair, Jr., A. T. 1994, Jour-
nal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 31, 900
Mommert, M., Farnocchia, D., Hora, J. L., Chesley, S. R.,
Trilling, D. E., Chodas, P. W., Mueller, M., Harris,
A. W., Smith, H. A., & Fazio, G. G. 2014a, Astrophys. J.
Lett., 789, L22
Mommert, M., Hora, J. L., Farnocchia, D., Chesley, S. R.,
Vokrouhlick´y, D., Trilling, D. E., Mueller, M., Harris,
A. W., Smith, H. A., & Fazio, G. G. 2014b, Astrophys.
J., 786, 148
Mommert, M., Hora, J. L., Harris, A. W., Reach, W. T.,
Emery, J. P., Thomas, C. A., Mueller, M., Cruikshank,
D. P., Trilling, D. E., Delbo, M., & Smith, H. A. 2014c,
Astrophys. J., 781, 25
Morrison, D. & Lebofsky, L. 1979, Radiometry of aster-
oids, ed. T. Gehrels, 184 -- 205
Mueller, M., Delbo', M., Hora, J. L., Trilling, D. E., Bhat-
tacharya, B., Bottke, W. F., Chesley, S., Emery, J. P.,
Fazio, G., Harris, A. W., Mainzer, A., Mommert, M.,
Penprase, B., Smith, H. A., Spahr, T. B., Stansberry,
J. A., & Thomas, C. A. 2011, Astron. J., 141, 109
Mueller, M., Harris, A. W., & Fitzsimmons, A. 2007,
Icarus, 187, 611
Muller, T., Balog, Z., Nielbock, M., Lim, T., Teyssier, D.,
Olberg, M., Klaas, U., Linz, H., Altieri, B., Pearson, C.,
Bendo, G., & Vilenius, E. 2014a, Experimental Astron-
omy, 37, 253
Muller, T. G., Hasegawa, S., & Usui, F. 2014b, PASJ, 66,
52
Muller, T. G., Kiss, C., Scheirich, P., Pravec, P., O'Rourke,
L., Vilenius, E., & Altieri, B. 2014c, Astron. Astrophys.,
566, A22
Muller, T. G., Lellouch, E., Stansberry, J., Kiss, C.,
Santos-Sanz, P., Vilenius, E., Protopapa, S., Moreno,
R., Mueller, M., Delsanti, A., Duffard, R., Fornasier, S.,
Groussin, O., Harris, A. W., Henry, F., Horner, J., Lac-
erda, P., Lim, T., Mommert, M., Ortiz, J. L., Rengel,
M., Thirouin, A., Trilling, D., Barucci, A., Crovisier, J.,
Doressoundiram, A., Dotto, E., Guti´errez, P. J., Hainaut,
O. R., Hartogh, P., Hestroffer, D., Kidger, M., Lara, L.,
Swinyard, B., & Thomas, N. 2010, Astron. Astrophys.,
518, L146
Muller, T. G., Miyata, T., Kiss, C., Gurwell, M. A.,
Hasegawa, S., Vilenius, E., Sako, S., Kamizuka, T.,
Nakamura, T., Asano, K., Uchiyama, M., Konishi, M.,
Yoneda, M., Ootsubo, T., Usui, F., Yoshii, Y., Kidger,
M., Altieri, B., Lorente, R., P´al, A., O'Rourke, L., &
Metcalfe, L. 2013, Astron. Astrophys., 558, A97
19
Muller, T. G., O'Rourke, L., Barucci, A. M., P´al, A., Kiss,
C., Zeidler, P., Altieri, B., Gonz´alez-Garc´ıa, B. M., &
Kuppers, M. 2012, Astron. Astrophys., 548, A36
Ostro, S. J., Hudson, R. S., Benner, L. A. M., Giorgini,
J. D., Magri, C., Margot, J. L., & Nolan, M. C. 2002,
Asteroids III, 151
Murakami, H., Baba, H., Barthel, P., Clements, D. L., Co-
hen, M., Doi, Y., Enya, K., Figueredo, E., Fujishiro,
N., Fujiwara, H., Fujiwara, M., Garcia-Lario, P., Goto,
T., Hasegawa, S., Hibi, Y., Hirao, T., Hiromoto, N.,
Hong, S. S., Imai, K., Ishigaki, M., Ishiguro, M., Ishi-
hara, D., Ita, Y., Jeong, W.-S., Jeong, K. S., Kaneda,
H., Kataza, H., Kawada, M., Kawai, T., Kawamura, A.,
Kessler, M. F., Kester, D., Kii, T., Kim, D. C., Kim, W.,
Kobayashi, H., Koo, B. C., Kwon, S. M., Lee, H. M.,
Lorente, R., Makiuti, S., Matsuhara, H., Matsumoto, T.,
Matsuo, H., Matsuura, S., Muller, T. G., Murakami, N.,
Nagata, H., Nakagawa, T., Naoi, T., Narita, M., Noda,
M., Oh, S. H., Ohnishi, A., Ohyama, Y., Okada, Y.,
Okuda, H., Oliver, S., Onaka, T., Ootsubo, T., Oyabu,
S., Pak, S., Park, Y.-S., Pearson, C. P., Rowan-Robinson,
M., Saito, T., Sakon, I., Salama, A., Sato, S., Savage,
R. S., Serjeant, S., Shibai, H., Shirahata, M., Sohn,
J., Suzuki, T., Takagi, T., Takahashi, H., Tanab´e, T.,
Takeuchi, T. T., Takita, S., Thomson, M., Uemizu, K.,
Ueno, M., Usui, F., Verdugo, E., Wada, T., Wang, L.,
Watabe, T., Watarai, H., White, G. J., Yamamura, I., Ya-
mauchi, C., & Yasuda, A. 2007, PASJ, 59, 369
Nakagawa, T., Enya, K., Hirabayashi, M., Kaneda, H.,
Kii, T., Kimura, Y., Matsumoto, T., Murakami, H.,
Murakami, M., Narasaki, K., Narita, M., Ohnishi, A.,
Tsunematsu, S., & Yoshida, S. 2007, PASJ, 59, 377
Neugebauer, G., Habing, H. J., van Duinen, R., Aumann,
H. H., Baud, B., Beichman, C. A., Beintema, D. A.,
Boggess, N., Clegg, P. E., de Jong, T., Emerson, J. P.,
Gautier, T. N., Gillett, F. C., Harris, S., Hauser, M. G.,
Houck, J. R., Jennings, R. E., Low, F. J., Marsden, P. L.,
Miley, G., Olnon, F. M., Pottasch, S. R., Raimond, E.,
Rowan-Robinson, M., Soifer, B. T., Walker, R. G., Wes-
selius, P. R., & Young, E. 1984, Astrophys. J. Lett., 278,
L1
Onaka, T., Matsuhara, H., Wada, T., Fujishiro, N., Fujiwara,
H., Ishigaki, M., Ishihara, D., Ita, Y., Kataza, H., Kim,
W., Matsumoto, T., Murakami, H., Ohyama, Y., Oyabu,
S., Sakon, I., Tanab´e, T., Takagi, T., Uemizu, K., Ueno,
M., Usui, F., Watarai, H., Cohen, M., Enya, K., Oot-
subo, T., Pearson, C. P., Takeyama, N., Yamamuro, T.,
& Ikeda, Y. 2007, PASJ, 59, 401
O'Rourke, L., Muller, T., Valtchanov,
I., Altieri, B.,
Gonz´alez-Garcia, B. M., Bhattacharya, B., Jorda, L.,
Carry, B., Kuppers, M., Groussin, O., Altwegg, K.,
Barucci, M. A., Bockelee-Morvan, D., Crovisier, J.,
Dotto, E., Garcia-Lario, P., Kidger, M., Llorente, A.,
Lorente, R., Marston, A. P., Sanchez Portal, M., Schulz,
R., Sierra, M., Teyssier, D., & Vavrek, R. 2012,
Planet. Space Sci., 66, 192
Pilbratt, G. L., Riedinger, J. R., Passvogel, T., Crone, G.,
Doyle, D., Gageur, U., Heras, A. M., Jewell, C., Met-
calfe, L., Ott, S., & Schmidt, M. 2010, Astron. Astro-
phys., 518, L1
Poglitsch, A., Waelkens, C., Geis, N., Feuchtgruber, H.,
Vandenbussche, B., Rodriguez, L., Krause, O., Renotte,
E., van Hoof, C., Saraceno, P., Cepa, J., Kerschbaum, F.,
Agn`ese, P., Ali, B., Altieri, B., Andreani, P., Augueres,
J.-L., Balog, Z., Barl, L., Bauer, O. H., Belbachir, N.,
Benedettini, M., Billot, N., Boulade, O., Bischof, H.,
Blommaert, J., Callut, E., Cara, C., Cerulli, R., Ce-
sarsky, D., Contursi, A., Creten, Y., De Meester, W.,
Doublier, V., Doumayrou, E., Duband, L., Exter, K.,
Genzel, R., Gillis, J.-M., Grozinger, U., Henning, T.,
Herreros, J., Huygen, R., Inguscio, M., Jakob, G., Ja-
mar, C., Jean, C., de Jong, J., Katterloher, R., Kiss,
C., Klaas, U., Lemke, D., Lutz, D., Madden, S., Mar-
quet, B., Martignac, J., Mazy, A., Merken, P., Montfort,
F., Morbidelli, L., Muller, T., Nielbock, M., Okumura,
K., Orfei, R., Ottensamer, R., Pezzuto, S., Popesso, P.,
Putzeys, J., Regibo, S., Reveret, V., Royer, P., Sauvage,
M., Schreiber, J., Stegmaier, J., Schmitt, D., Schubert,
J., Sturm, E., Thiel, M., Tofani, G., Vavrek, R., Wet-
zstein, M., Wieprecht, E., & Wiezorrek, E. 2010, Astron.
Astrophys., 518, L2
Pravec, P., Harris, A. W., Kusnir´ak, P., Gal´ad, A., &
Hornoch, K. 2012, Icarus, 221, 365
Price, S. D., Egan, M. P., Carey, S. J., Mizuno, D. R., &
Kuchar, T. A. 2001, Astron. J., 121, 2819
Reach, W. T., Kelley, M. S., & Vaubaillon, J. 2013, Icarus,
226, 777
Reddy, V. 2010, NASA Planetary Data System, 127
Rieke, G. H., Young, E. T., Engelbracht, C. W., Kelly,
D. M., Low, F. J., Haller, E. E., Beeman, J. W., Gordon,
K. D., Stansberry, J. A., Misselt, K. A., Cadien, J., Mor-
rison, J. E., Rivlis, G., Latter, W. B., Noriega-Crespo,
A., Padgett, D. L., Stapelfeldt, K. R., Hines, D. C.,
Egami, E., Muzerolle, J., Alonso-Herrero, A., Blaylock,
M., Dole, H., Hinz, J. L., Le Floc'h, E., Papovich, C.,
P´erez-Gonz´alez, P. G., Smith, P. S., Su, K. Y. L., Ben-
nett, L., Frayer, D. T., Henderson, D., Lu, N., Masci, F.,
Pesenson, M., Rebull, L., Rho, J., Keene, J., Stolovy, S.,
Wachter, S., Wheaton, W., Werner, M. W., & Richards,
P. L. 2004, Astrophys. J. Suppl., 154, 25
Spahr, T. B. 1998, PhD thesis, University of Florida
Spencer, J. R., Lebofsky, L. A., & Sykes, M. V. 1989,
Icarus, 78, 337
20
Stevenson, R., Kramer, E. A., Bauer, J. M., Masiero, J. R.,
& Mainzer, A. K. 2012, Astrophys. J., 759, 142
Storrie-Lombardi, L. J. & Dodd, S. R. 2012, in Society
of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Con-
ference Series, Vol. 8448, Society of Photo-Optical In-
strumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series
Stoughton, C., Lupton, R. H., Bernardi, M., Blanton, M. R.,
Burles, S., Castander, F. J., Connolly, A. J., Eisenstein,
D. J., Frieman, J. A., Hennessy, G. S., Hindsley, R. B.,
Ivezi´c, Z., Kent, S., Kunszt, P. Z., Lee, B. C., Meiksin,
A., Munn, J. A., Newberg, H. J., Nichol, R. C., Nicin-
ski, T., Pier, J. R., Richards, G. T., Richmond, M. W.,
Schlegel, D. J., Smith, J. A., Strauss, M. A., SubbaRao,
M., Szalay, A. S., Thakar, A. R., Tucker, D. L., Van-
den Berk, D. E., Yanny, B., Adelman, J. K., Anderson,
Jr., J. E., Anderson, S. F., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A.,
Bakken, J. A., Bartelmann, M., Bastian, S., Bauer, A.,
Berman, E., Bohringer, H., Boroski, W. N., Bracker, S.,
Briegel, C., Briggs, J. W., Brinkmann, J., Brunner, R.,
Carey, L., Carr, M. A., Chen, B., Christian, D., Cole-
stock, P. L., Crocker, J. H., Csabai, I., Czarapata, P. C.,
Dalcanton, J., Davidsen, A. F., Davis, J. E., Dehnen, W.,
Dodelson, S., Doi, M., Dombeck, T., Donahue, M., Ell-
man, N., Elms, B. R., Evans, M. L., Eyer, L., Fan, X.,
Federwitz, G. R., Friedman, S., Fukugita, M., Gal, R.,
Gillespie, B., Glazebrook, K., Gray, J., Grebel, E. K.,
Greenawalt, B., Greene, G., Gunn, J. E., de Haas, E.,
Haiman, Z., Haldeman, M., Hall, P. B., Hamabe, M.,
Hansen, B., Harris, F. H., Harris, H., Harvanek, M.,
Hawley, S. L., Hayes, J. J. E., Heckman, T. M., Helmi,
A., Henden, A., Hogan, C. J., Hogg, D. W., Holmgren,
D. J., Holtzman, J., Huang, C.-H., Hull, C., Ichikawa, S.-
I., Ichikawa, T., Johnston, D. E., Kauffmann, G., Kim,
R. S. J., Kimball, T., Kinney, E., Klaene, M., Klein-
man, S. J., Klypin, A., Knapp, G. R., Korienek, J.,
Krolik, J., Kron, R. G., Krzesi´nski, J., Lamb, D. Q.,
Leger, R. F., Limmongkol, S., Lindenmeyer, C., Long,
D. C., Loomis, C., Loveday, J., MacKinnon, B., Man-
nery, E. J., Mantsch, P. M., Margon, B., McGehee, P.,
McKay, T. A., McLean, B., Menou, K., Merelli, A.,
Mo, H. J., Monet, D. G., Nakamura, O., Narayanan,
V. K., Nash, T., Neilsen, Jr., E. H., Newman, P. R., Nitta,
A., Odenkirchen, M., Okada, N., Okamura, S., Ostriker,
J. P., Owen, R., Pauls, A. G., Peoples, J., Peterson, R. S.,
Petravick, D., Pope, A., Pordes, R., Postman, M., Prosa-
pio, A., Quinn, T. R., Rechenmacher, R., Rivetta, C. H.,
Rix, H.-W., Rockosi, C. M., Rosner, R., Ruthmansdor-
fer, K., Sandford, D., Schneider, D. P., Scranton, R.,
Sekiguchi, M., Sergey, G., Sheth, R., Shimasaku, K.,
Smee, S., Snedden, S. A., Stebbins, A., Stubbs, C., Sza-
pudi, I., Szkody, P., Szokoly, G. P., Tabachnik, S., Tsve-
tanov, Z., Uomoto, A., Vogeley, M. S., Voges, W., Wad-
dell, P., Walterbos, R., Wang, S.-i., Watanabe, M., Wein-
berg, D. H., White, R. L., White, S. D. M., Wilhite, B.,
Wolfe, D., Yasuda, N., York, D. G., Zehavi, I., & Zheng,
W. 2002, Astron. J., 123, 485
Tabachnik, S. A. & Evans, N. W. 2000, Mon. Not. R. Astron.
Soc., 319, 63
Tedesco, E. F., Egan, M. P., & Price, S. D. 2002a, Astron.
J., 124, 583
Tedesco, E. F., Noah, P. V., Noah, M., & Price, S. D. 2002b,
Astron. J., 123, 1056
Tholen, D. & Barucci, M. 1989,
in Asteroids II, ed.
R. P. Binzel, T. Gehrels, & M. S. Matthews
Thomas, C. A., Trilling, D. E., Emery, J. P., Mueller, M.,
Hora, J. L., Benner, L. A. M., Bhattacharya, B., Bottke,
W. F., Chesley, S., Delb´o, M., Fazio, G., Harris, A. W.,
Mainzer, A., Mommert, M., Morbidelli, A., Penprase,
B., Smith, H. A., Spahr, T. B., & Stansberry, J. A. 2011,
Astron. J., 142, 85
Tosi, F., Capria, M. T., De Sanctis, M. C., Combe, J.-
P., Zambon, F., Nathues, A., Schroder, S. E., Li, J.-Y.,
Palomba, E., Longobardo, A., Blewett, D. T., Denevi,
B. W., Palmer, E., Capaccioni, F., Ammannito, E., Ti-
tus, T. M., Mittlefehldt, D. W., Sunshine, J. M., Russell,
C. T., & Raymond, C. A. 2014, Icarus, 240, 36
Trilling, D. E., Mueller, M., Hora, J. L., Harris, A. W.,
Bhattacharya, B., Bottke, W. F., Chesley, S., Delbo, M.,
Emery, J. P., Fazio, G., Mainzer, A., Penprase, B., Smith,
H. A., Spahr, T. B., Stansberry, J. A., & Thomas, C. A.
2010, Astron. J., 140, 770
Usui, F., Hasegawa, S., Ishiguro, M., Muller, T. G., & Oot-
subo, T. 2014, PASJ
Usui, F., Kasuga, T., Hasegawa, S., Ishiguro, M., Kuroda,
D., Muller, T. G., Ootsubo, T., & Matsuhara, H. 2013,
Astrophys. J., 762, 56
Usui, F., Kuroda, D., Muller, T. G., Hasegawa, S., Ishig-
uro, M., Ootsubo, T., Ishihara, D., Kataza, H., Takita, S.,
Oyabu, S., Ueno, M., Matsuhara, H., & Onaka, T. 2011,
PASJ, 63, 1117
Veeder, G. J., Tedesco, E. F., & Matson, D. L. 1989, in As-
teroids II, ed. R. P. Binzel, T. Gehrels, & M. S. Matthews,
282 -- 289
Vernazza, P., Delbo, M., King, P. L., Izawa, M. R. M., Olof-
sson, J., Lamy, P., Cipriani, F., Binzel, R. P., Marchis, F.,
Mer´ın, B., & Tamanai, A. 2012, Icarus, 221, 1162
Vernazza, P., Fulvio, D., Brunetto, R., Emery, J. P., Dukes,
C. A., Cipriani, F., Witasse, O., Schaible, M. J., Zanda,
B., Strazzulla, G., & Baragiola, R. A. 2013, Icarus, 225,
517
Walsh, K. J., Delb´o, M., Bottke, W. F., Vokrouhlick´y, D., &
Lauretta, D. S. 2013, Icarus, 225, 283
Warner, B. D., Harris, A. W., & Pravec, P. 2009, Icarus,
202, 134
21
Werner, M. W., Roellig, T. L., Low, F. J., Rieke, G. H.,
Rieke, M., Hoffmann, W. F., Young, E., Houck, J. R.,
Brandl, B., Fazio, G. G., Hora, J. L., Gehrz, R. D.,
Helou, G., Soifer, B. T., Stauffer, J., Keene, J., Eisen-
hardt, P., Gallagher, D., Gautier, T. N., Irace, W.,
Lawrence, C. R., Simmons, L., Van Cleve, J. E., Jura,
M., Wright, E. L., & Cruikshank, D. P. 2004, Astrophys.
J. Suppl., 154, 1
Whipple, F. L. 1983, IAU Circ., 3881, 1
Williams, G. V. 2012, PhD thesis, Open University UK
Wolters, S. D., Green, S. F., McBride, N., & Davies, J. K.
2005, Icarus, 175, 92
-- . 2008, Icarus, 193, 535
Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., Ressler,
M. E., Cutri, R. M., Jarrett, T., Kirkpatrick, J. D., Pad-
gett, D., McMillan, R. S., Skrutskie, M., Stanford, S. A.,
Cohen, M., Walker, R. G., Mather, J. C., Leisawitz, D.,
Gautier, III, T. N., McLean, I., Benford, D., Lonsdale,
C. J., Blain, A., Mendez, B., Irace, W. R., Duval, V.,
Liu, F., Royer, D., Heinrichsen, I., Howard, J., Shannon,
M., Kendall, M., Walsh, A. L., Larsen, M., Cardon, J. G.,
Schick, S., Schwalm, M., Abid, M., Fabinsky, B., Naes,
L., & Tsai, C.-W. 2010, Astron. J., 140, 1868
Xu, S., Binzel, R. P., Burbine, T. H., & Bus, S. J. 1995,
Icarus, 115, 1
Yamamura, I., Makiuti, S., Ikeda, N., Fukuda, Y., Oyabu,
S., Koga, T., & White, G. J. 2010, VizieR Online Data
Catalog, 2298, 0
Young, E. T. 1993, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumen-
tation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 2019,
Infrared Spaceborne Remote Sensing, ed. M. S. Scholl,
96 -- 108
Yu, L., Ji, J., & Wang, S. 2014, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.,
439, 3357
This 2-column preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2.
22
|
1106.3329 | 1 | 1106 | 2011-06-16T20:00:04 | The Eccentric Kozai Mechanism for a Test Particle | [
"astro-ph.EP",
"astro-ph.SR"
] | We study the dynamical evolution of a test particle that orbits a star in the presence of an exterior massive planet, considering octupole-order secular interactions. In the standard Kozai mechanism (SKM), the planet's orbit is circular, and so the particle conserves vertical angular momentum. As a result, the particle's orbit oscillates periodically, exchanging eccentricity for inclination. However, when the planet's orbit is eccentric, the particle's vertical angular momentum varies and its Kozai oscillations are modulated on longer timescales---we call this the eccentric Kozai mechanism (EKM). The EKM can lead to behavior that is dramatically different from the SKM. In particular, the particle's orbit can flip from prograde to retrograde and back again, and it can reach arbitrarily high eccentricities given enough time. We map out the conditions under which this dramatic behavior (flipping and extreme eccentricities) occurs, and show that when the planet's eccentricity is sufficiently high, it occurs quite generically. For example, when the planet's eccentricity exceeds a few percent of the ratio of semi-major axes (outer to inner), around half of randomly oriented test particle orbits will flip and reach extreme eccentricities. The SKM has often been invoked for bringing pairs of astronomical bodies (star-star, planet-star, compact-object pairs) close together. Including the effect of the EKM will enhance the rate at which such matchmaking occurs. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph |
Draft version October 6, 2018
Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 5/25/10
THE ECCENTRIC KOZAI MECHANISM FOR A TEST PARTICLE
Yoram Lithwick1 and Smadar Naoz1
Draft version October 6, 2018
ABSTRACT
We study the dynamical evolution of a test particle that orbits a star in the presence of an exterior
In the standard Kozai mechanism
massive planet, considering octupole-order secular interactions.
(SKM), the planet's orbit is circular, and so the particle conserves vertical angular momentum. As
a result, the particle's orbit oscillates periodically, exchanging eccentricity for inclination. However,
when the planet's orbit is eccentric, the particle's vertical angular momentum varies and its Kozai
oscillations are modulated on longer timescales -- we call this the eccentric Kozai mechanism (EKM).
The EKM can lead to behavior that is dramatically different from the SKM. In particular, the par-
ticle's orbit can flip from prograde to retrograde and back again, and it can reach arbitrarily high
eccentricities given enough time. We map out the conditions under which this dramatic behavior (flip-
ping and extreme eccentricities) occurs, and show that when the planet's eccentricity is sufficiently
high, it occurs quite generically. For example, when the planet's eccentricity exceeds a few percent
of the ratio of semi-major axes (outer to inner), around half of randomly oriented test particle orbits
will flip and reach extreme eccentricities. The SKM has often been invoked for bringing pairs of
astronomical bodies (star-star, planet-star, compact-object pairs) close together. Including the effect
of the EKM will enhance the rate at which such matchmaking occurs.
1.
INTRODUCTION
Naoz et al. (2011a) recently showed that in a system
with two planets orbiting a star, the inner planet's or-
bit can flip from prograde to retrograde and back, and
can also reach extremely high eccentricities. Therefore,
starting from a system with two prograde planets on dis-
tant orbits from their star, the inner planet can both
flip its orbital orientation and reach high enough ec-
centricities to be tidally captured by the star. That
might explain the origin of the ∼ 25% of hot Jupiters
whose orbits are retrograde with respect to the spin of
their star, as inferred from Rossiter-McLaughlin mea-
surements (e.g., Triaud et al. 2010). However, while
the behavior displayed in Naoz et al. (2011a) is in-
triguing, it has not yet been understood. Furthermore,
Naoz et al. (2011a) choose initial eccentricities and in-
clinations that are fairly extreme for planetary systems
(e ∼ 0.6, i ∼ 70◦), and hence it is not yet clear how
generic their results are. The goal of this paper is to
understand and map out the mechanism in a simplified
system where the inner planet is treated as a massless
test particle.
There has been much work in the literature on the
orbital dynamics of similar systems. Kozai (1962) con-
sidered the evolution of an asteroid perturbed by a cir-
cular Jupiter. He focused on secular interactions, mean-
ing that interactions are averaged over the orbital phases
of the asteroid and Jupiter. Kozai found a remarkable
result: if the asteroid's orbit is sufficiently inclined (be-
tween 39◦ and 141◦), then it cannot remain on a circular
orbit.
Instead, its eccentricity and inclination oscillate
periodically. Furthermore, if the asteroid is highly in-
clined (∼ 90◦), then its eccentricity will grow over the
course of a single Kozai oscillation to ∼ 1.
The Kozai mechanism has been applied to a variety of
1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern Uni-
versity, 2145 Sheridan Rd., Evanston, IL 60208
astronomical systems. For example, in triple star sys-
tems, if the outer star is inclined it can force Kozai oscil-
lations in the inner binary, increasing the inner binary's
eccentricity until tidal dissipation circularizes it into a
very tight orbit (e.g., Eggleton & Kiseleva-Eggleton 2001;
Fabrycky & Tremaine 2007). Similarly, if a Jupiter-mass
planet forms around a star with an inclined compan-
ion star, that companion can force Kozai oscillations in
the planet until tides damp its orbit, forming it into a
hot Jupiter (Wu & Murray 2003; Fabrycky & Tremaine
2007). Analogous scenarios have been proposed for merg-
ing supermassive black holes (Blaes et al. 2002) and
stellar-mass compact objects (Thompson 2010). See also
Naoz et al. (2011b) for a review of other applications of
the Kozai mechanism.
tical angular momentum (=const×√
In the case considered by Kozai, the asteroid's ver-
1 − e2 cos i) is con-
served because Jupiter's orbit is circular. Since this is
a two degree of freedom system (eccentricity and incli-
nation) with two conserved quantities (vertical angular
momentum and secular energy), it is integrable. But
when Jupiter's orbit is eccentric, the dynamics can no
longer be solved analytically. As Kozai noted, "[w]ithout
the aid of a high-speed computer, it is rather difficult to
estimate the effects of Jupiter's eccentricity."
The effect of an eccentric perturber on Kozai oscilla-
tions has been considered in a number of example cases.
Harrington (1969) integrates the secular octupole equa-
tions for four triple star systems, and shows that in one
case there is a new resonance; in a second case there
is chaos; and in the other two cases no new interesting
effects arise. Holman et al. (1997) perform a direct nu-
merical integration for a planet forced by a star, but with
their parameters ( (cid:39) 0.008 in our notation, see below),
the perturber's finite eccentricity only leads to a narrow
zone of chaos around the Kozai separatrix. Ford et al.
(2000) integrate the secular octupole equations for a sys-
2
tem of two eccentric planets, where the outer planet has
eccentricity = 0.9, and find that the inner planet's Kozai
oscillations are modulated on long timescales, leading to
extreme eccentricities. Blaes et al. (2002) examine some
examples for triples of supermassive black holes. Naoz
et al. (2011a,b) examine some examples for two planets.
Yet a systematic exploration of the effect of an eccentric
Kozai perturber is lacking.
In a number of studies the effect of an eccentric per-
turber on Kozai oscillations has been neglected, even in
situations where it should not be (Naoz et al. 2011b).
Part of the reason is that treatments of Kozai oscilla-
tions often expand the secular Hamiltonian to leading
order in the ratio of semimajor axes, i.e. to quadrupole
order. At that order, the exterior body's argument of pe-
riapse does not appear, which implies that the particle's
vertical angular momentum is conserved.2 To see the ef-
fect of the eccentricity, one must work to higher order
in the ratio of semimajor axes, i.e. at least to octupole
order.
In this paper, we extend Kozai's work to the case of
an eccentric planet and map out the resulting behavior,
which we call the eccentric Kozai mechanism (EKM).
To do so, we use the secular octupole Hamiltonian of
Ford et al. (2000), which was apparently first derived
by Harrington (1968) (as cited by Harrington 1969; see
also Marchal 1990 and Krymolowski & Mazeh 1999 for
derivations).
After the work described here was completed, we learnt
of a similar paper being prepared by Katz, Dong, and
Malhotra.
This paper is organized as follows.
In Section 2, we
present the equations of motion, relegating their deriva-
tion to the Appendix. In Section 3, we review the SKM.
In Section 4, the heart of this paper, we map out the
EKM. We summarize in Section 5.
2. EQUATIONS OF MOTION
We solve for the orbit of a massless test particle in the
presence of an exterior massive planet, including only
secular interactions expanded to octupole order. The
planet is on a fixed eccentric orbit, and the particle's
orbit is specified by four variables,
{e, ω, θ ≡ cos i, Ω} ,
(1)
which are its eccentricity, argument of periapse, inclina-
tion (or its cosine), and longitude of ascending node rel-
ative to the planet's periapse (e.g., Murray & Dermott
2000).
In the Appendix, we use the secular octupole
Hamiltonian that has been published in the literature to
derive the particle's equations of motion. As we show in
the Appendix, although that published Hamiltonian has
had its nodes eliminated, one can still use it to derive the
full test particle equations of motion -- even the equation
that requires the nodes.
We summarize the equations here. Defining the parti-
cle's (scaled) total angular momentum and vertical an-
2 The fact that the exterior body's argument of periapse does
not appear to quadrupole order has been called " a happy coin-
cidence" because it makes the system integrable (Lidov & Ziglin
1976; Laskar & Bou´e 2010). However, it is perhaps more of an
unhappy coincidence in view of the fact that it has misled some
researchers into neglecting the role of the planet's eccentricity.
gular momentum as3
J ≡(cid:112)
(cid:112)
Jz ≡ θ
1 − e2
1 − e2 ,
(2)
(3)
the equations of motion may be expressed as partial
derivatives of an energy function F (e, ω, θ, Ω) via
dJ
dt
dJz
dt
dω
dt
dΩ
dt
=
=
∂F
∂ω
∂F
∂Ω
∂F
J
=
∂e
e
=− ∂F
∂θ
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
+
∂F
∂θ
θ
J
1
J
where t is proportional to time (Eq.
[A8]). These are
Hamilton's equations for the two pairs of canonically con-
jugate variables {J, ω} and {Jz, Ω}, except that we ex-
press F as a function of the non-canonical variables e and
θ -- for that reason, we call F the energy function rather
than the Hamiltonian. Of course, F is a constant of the
motion. It is given by a quadrupole and an octupole term
F ≡ Fqu + Foc ,
where the constant
≡ (a/apl)epl
1 − e2
pl
;
(8)
(9)
here a/apl is the ratio of semimajor axes (inner to outer)
and epl is the planet's eccentricity. The quadrupole piece
is
Fqu ≡ − e2
2
+ θ2 +
3
2
e2θ2 +
5
2
e2(1 − θ2) cos(2ω) ,
(10)
3
4
e3)
(e +
after dropping an irrelevant constant, and the octupole
term is
Foc ≡ 5
16
(cid:104)(cid:0)1 + 11θ − 5θ2 − 15θ3(cid:1) cos(ω + Ω)
(cid:105)
+(cid:0)1 − 11θ − 5θ2 + 15θ3(cid:1) cos(ω − Ω)
e3(cid:104)(cid:0)1 − θ − θ2 + θ3(cid:1) cos(3ω − Ω)
(cid:105)
+(cid:0)1 + θ − θ2 − θ3(cid:1) cos(3ω + Ω)
− 175
64
.(11)
The only adjustable parameter in the equations of mo-
tion other than the initial conditions is the constant .
That constant encodes the properties of the planet.4 In
the standard Kozai mechanism (SKM), the planet's or-
bit is circular ( = 0). Hence F is independent of Ω, and
thus Jz is a constant of the motion. But if the planet's
eccentricity is not zero ( > 0), then the octupole term
allows Jz to change. If the planet is either nearly circular
(epl (cid:28) 1) or distant (a/apl (cid:28) 1), then is very small,
3 Our variables are related to the Delaunay variables {G, g, H, h}
that are often used in treatments of Kozai oscillations via J =
GN M∗a), Ω = h (Eqs.
G/(m
[A3]-[A4]).
GN M∗a), ω = g, Jz = H/(m
√
√
4 The planet's properties also enter in a trivial way through the
scaling between t and time (Eq. [A8]).
3
Fig. 2. -- SKM ( = 0): The left panel shows trajectories with
fixed F and various values of Jz ("Kozai curves"). The left-most
tips of the Kozai curves (with co-ordinates {e0, θ0}) trace out
another curve, which we call the "energy curve." That energy
curve is shown in green in the right panel; it is the level curve of
Fqu,0 ≡ Fquω=0 = 0.16. The right panel also shows some other
energy curves. These intersect the θ0 axis at (cid:112)Fqu,0 and the e0
axis at(cid:112)Fqu,0/2
• On a trajectory that has e0 (cid:28) 1, the largest e is
0 ≈ 1 − 5
θ2
3
J 2
z ,
(12)
e2±π/2 ≈ 1 − 5
3
0, when θ0 <(cid:112)3/5. (The cor-
cos−1 ±(cid:112)3/5 = 39◦ and 141◦.) Therefore when
to leading order in e2
responding inclinations are the critical Kozai angles
θ0 (cid:28) 1 (i.e. inclination close to 90◦), the largest
eccentricity is nearly unity.
• Given F and Jz, the minimal e on a circulating
trajectory satisfies
e2
0 =
(F − J 2
z ) .
1
2
(13)
Figure 2, left panel, shows a sequence of Kozai curves
with the same F and differing Jz. The left boundaries
of the sequence (i.e., the values {e0, θ0} for each Kozai
curve) trace out a curve in the e-θ plane, which we call
an "energy curve." That curve is plotted in green in the
right panel of Figure 2. An energy curve is a curve of
constant Fquω=0.
Its form is given by Equation (13)
with J 2
0). The right panel of Figure 2 also
shows other energy curves with different energies Fqu.
0(1 − θ2
z = e2
4. THE ECCENTRIC KOZAI MECHANISM ( > 0)
When the planet is eccentric ( > 0) there is only a sin-
gle conserved quantity, the secular energy F . Therefore
the particle's trajectories are more complicated, and can
even be chaotic. Figure 3 shows two sample trajectories
in the e-θ plane for = 0.01. Both trajectories have the
same energy F = 0.16, but different initial conditions
consistent with that energy. Rather than being confined
to a single Kozai curve, the particle evolves from one
Kozai curve to another. As long as (cid:28) 1, all of these
Kozai curves have nearly the same Fqu, and therefore the
trajectories in Figure 3 follow along the tracks displayed
in the left panel of Figure 2.
Trajectory 'a' in Figure 3 evolves through θ = 0. Its
orbit flips from prograde (θ > 0) to retrograde (θ < 0)
Fig. 1. -- SKM ( = 0): The three left panels show trajectories
with Jz = 0.2 and various values of F . Trajectories with the same
Jz overlap in the e-θ plane (bottom panel); we have slightly offset
these for clarity. The right panels show the same, but with Jz =
0.6. For circulating trajectories, the minimum e and θ occur at ω =
0. The dashed horizontal lines show the cosine of the critical Kozai
inclination, (cid:112)3/5. The separatrix -- which separates circulating
from librating trajectories -- always has e0 = 0 and θπ/2 =(cid:112)3/5
and the evolution is typically similar to the SKM (except
at extremely high inclinations). But as we shall show, if
(cid:38) 0.01, then the octupole term can lead to qualitatively
new behavior that is not found in the = 0 limit.
3. THE STANDARD KOZAI MECHANISM ( = 0)
We review the SKM to set the stage for the EKM.
For the SKM, the planet's orbit is circular ( = 0, i.e.
F = Fqu). Hence there are two constants of the motion,
F and Jz, and the motion is regular. Each trajectory may
be labelled by the values of F and Jz. Inserting Equation
(3) into Equation (10) immediately determines e as a
function of ω, as well as θ as a function of ω. The three
left panels of Figure 1 show sample trajectories, with
fixed Jz = 0.2 and various values of F ; the right panels
show the same, but with Jz = 0.4. For our purposes, the
most important properties of the SKM are as follows:
• Because Jz =constant, each trajectory traces out
a curve in the e-θ plane, which we call a "Kozai
curve."
• There are two classes of trajectories, librating and
circulating. On circulating trajectories, e and θ
are smallest at ω = 0, and they are largest at ω =
±π/2. The separatrix has e0 ≡ eω=0 = 05 and
θ±π/2 =(cid:112)3/5.
5 Throught this paper, we denote values at ω = 0 with subscript
'0'.
4
Fig. 3. -- EKM: Two sample trajectories ('a' and 'b') with F =
0.16, = 0.01, and different initial conditions. When the planet
is eccentric, the test particle no longer traces out a single Kozai
curve, but evolves from one Kozai curve to another, approximately
tracing out a sequence of Kozai curves that have a fixed quadrupole
energy (Fig. 2, left panel). Orbit 'a' flips repeatedly (i.e. crosses
θ = 0) and reaches extreme eccentricities, and orbit 'b' does not.
Although only points up to time t = 500 are plotted, longer runs
yield identical plots, albeit with more densely packed points. In
particular, orbit 'b' never flips.
and back again. Furthermore, its eccentricity approaches
unity. In fact, the flipping of an orbit is closely tied to
its eccentricity reaching unity. This can be seen from
Equation (12), which implies that a Kozai curve that has
θ0 ≈ 0 reaches e ≈ 1. (It never reaches exactly e = 1;
see below). Trajectory 'b' never flips, and its eccentricity
does not approach unity.
The left panels of Figure 4 show the temporal evolution
of θ and e for trajectory 'a'. The bottom left panel shows
two angles that appear as arguments of cosine terms in
Foc. When the particle's orbit is prograde, the angle ω +
Ω librates and ω−Ω circulates; and when it is retrograde,
those two angles switch roles. The right panels of Figure
4 show the same quantities for trajectory 'b'. Whereas
trajectory 'a' is regular, 'b' is chaotic. We demonstrate
that more explicitly below.
The left panels of Figure 5 are a zoom-in of the 'a' tra-
jectory at early times. The fast oscillations in θ and e
are primarily governed by the quadrupole evolution, as e
and θ trace out Kozai curves with F = 0.16 and various
values of Jz. Over the course of a single oscillation, ω
increases from 0 to π or from −π to 0 . Hence the or-
bit is always circulating (see Fig. 1). The top left panel
also shows Jz. Whereas in the SKM Jz =const., here Jz
changes in a nearly step-wise fashion. There are sharp
jumps in Jz whenever e and θ change rapidly; these are
forced by the octupolar contribution Foc. The long-term
evolution of Jz controls the envelopes of both θ (Fig. 5,
top-left panel) and e (Fig. 5, middle-left panel; see eq.
[12]). Successive maxima of e occur in discrete steps.
Therefore even when Jz crosses through zero, the max-
imum e is never precisely unity. Nonetheless, as time
evolves, the maximum e reached approaches closer and
closer to unity.
The right panels of Figure 5 show the corresponding
zoom-in for trajectory 'b'. The bottom right panel shows
that ω switches from circulation to libration and back
again. That explains why the 'b' trajectory is chaotic.
Similar behavior is shown in Holman et al. (1997).
A global view of the dynamics is provided by surfaces of
Fig. 4. -- EKM: Temporal evolution of the two trajectories de-
picted in Figure 3. In the bottom panels, the angles are cumulative.
Trajectory 'a' reaches extreme eccentricities when it flips. Its evo-
lution is regular, with ω + Ω librating when it is prograde, and
ω− Ω librating when it is retrograde. Trajectory 'b' is chaotic, and
never flips.
Fig. 5. -- EKM: Zoomed in evolution of trajectories 'a' and 'b' at
early times (Fig. 3). In the top panels the red lines show that Jz
controls the envelope of both θ and e (via eq. [12]). In the bottom
panels, the angles are not cumulative.
5
Fig. 7. -- First Flipping Orbit. Each curve marks the first flipping
orbit that can occur for a given value of . Above each curve (i.e.,
at low inclination) none of the orbits flip, and below it some do.
always flip provided that θ0 (cid:46) 0.2 (i.e., i0 (cid:38) cos−1 0.2 ∼
80◦ for prograde orbits). For e0 (cid:54)= 0, we infer from the
blue (F = 0.25) panels that even orbits with θ0 as large
as 0.4 (i0 as small as 66◦) can flip.
A second new behavior is the appearance of chaos.
Regular orbits appear as curves in the surfaces of section,
while chaotic orbits appear as a smattering of points. For
example, it is apparent from Figure 6 that trajectory 'a'
is regular and 'b' is chaotic. Chaos always occurs near
e0 = 0. That is because the Kozai separatrix always has
e0 = 0 (Section 3), and chaos is caused the crossing of
the Kozai separatrix, when ω transitions from librating
to circulating and back to librating (e.g., Fig. 5).
Figure 7 is the main result of this paper. It summa-
rizes where flipping orbits occur for various values of .
Towards the top of the plot (large θ0 and small i0), there
are no flipping orbits. But as θ0 decreases, an increasing
number of orbits can flip. Each curve marks, for a given
, the location at which the first flipping orbit occurs, if Ω
is judiciously chosen. Above the curve there are no flip-
ping orbits, and below there are some -- typically around
half of the orbits below the curve can flip. We made
this plot by running a suite of numerical simulations ini-
tialized with θ = 0 and ω = 0, and scanning through
values of initial e and Ω to determine which flipping or-
bit reached the largest values of θ0 for a given initial e,
and then plotting the extreme values of e0 and θ0 for that
orbit. (Note that all such trajectories initialized with the
same initial e = e0 share the same energy curve.)
A striking feature of Figure 7 is the fairly sudden tran-
sition when exceeds a few percent. For example, focus-
ing on orbits with e0 = 0, when = 0.01 flipping orbits
can occur only if θ0 (cid:46) 0.2 i.e., i0 (cid:38) 80◦ (for prograde),
as stated above. But for = 0.03 flips can occur for
θ0 ∼ 0.5, i.e. i0 ∼ 60◦ (for prograde). Note that if test
particle orbits are randomly oriented, they will be uni-
Fig. 6. -- EKM, = 0.01. Surfaces of section with various values
of F ; points are plotted whenever ω = 2nπ for integer n. For each
F , if the values of θ0 were plotted against the value of e0, they
would lie along an energy curve (Fig. 2, right panel). The colors
in that figure correspond to the colors in this one.
section. Figure 6 maps out the behavior when = 0.01.
We plot a point whenever ω = 2nπ for integer n.6 This
may be interpreted as follows. Consider trajectory 'a' of
Figure 3. When ω = 2nπ that trajectory hits the green
energy curve depicted in the right panel of Figure 2. At
those times we plot in Figure 6 the value of e = e0 versus
Ω and θ = θ0 versus Ω (curves labelled 'a', middle pan-
els). Also shown in those green middle panels are other
trajectories with the same energy F = 0.16, including
trajectory 'b'.
If all of the green points were plotted
against each other in the e0-θ0 plane, they would trace
out the energy curve labelled 0.16 in Figure 2. Equiva-
lently, one can imagine that that energy curve is extended
out of the plane of the paper into a half-cyliner, with the
third dimension being the value of Ω. The F = 0.16
surfaces of section of Figure 6 cover the surface of that
half-cylinder. Of course, for a given energy, the maxi-
mum θ0 is
those values, the energy curve does not exist (Fig. 2
caption).
F , and the maximum e0 is(cid:112)F/2. Beyond
√
The other panels in Figure 6 may be interpreted sim-
ilarly, with each pair of panels at fixed F lying along a
single energy curve of Figure 2 (with corresponding col-
ors). We therefore now have a virtually complete view of
the = 0.01 dynamics.
Perhaps the most dramatic new behavior caused by
the octupole term is that orbits can flip orientation (i.e.
cross θ = 0), and, as a consequence, reach arbitrarily high
values of eccentricity. From Figure 6, it is immediately
clear which orbits exhibit this behavior, and which do
not, at = 0.01. For example, orbits with e0 = 0 will
6 Trajectories only appear on our sections while ω is circulating,
because ω is never equal to 2nπ during librations (Fig. 1).
6
formly distributed in θ, and therefore half of the orbits
will have θ < 0.5. Of course, this is only a rough esti-
mate for the fraction of flipping orbits, since it depends
also on the values of the other variables (e, ω, Ω).
The curves in Figure 7 rise as e0 increases from 0, and
then suddenly turn over. The reason for the sudden turn
over is apparent from a glance at the surfaces of sec-
tion (Fig. 6). In the blue (F = 0.25) section, there are
flipping orbits centered both on Ω = 0 and on Ω = π,
with the latter ones reaching to a larger θ0. But in the
magenta (F = 0.36) section, there are no more flipping
orbits centered at Ω = π. It is that discontinuity that
gives rise to the sharp break in Figure 7.
5. SUMMARY
In this paper, we map out the behavior of a test parti-
cle that is forced by a massive eccentric planet, working
under the secular octupole approximation.
In Section 2, we give the evolutionary equations. These
are derived in the Appendix, where we show how one
may use the published Hamiltonian -- which has had its
nodes eliminated -- to derive the full equations of motion.
There is a single parameter, , that characterizes devi-
ations from the SKM (Eq.
[9]). The SKM is recovered
when (cid:28) 1, i.e. when the planet is either nearly circular
or very distant.
In Section 3, we review the SKM. In the e-θ plane
(where θ ≡ cos i), the particle traces out a Kozai curve
because its Jz is fixed. A sequence of Kozai curves with
the same energy F outline an energy curve, which is a
curve of constant secular energy, evaluated at ω = 0.
In Section 4, we map out what happens when the
planet's orbit is eccentric. Our principal results are:
• In the e-θ plane, a single trajectory evolves from
one Kozai curve to another, all of which abut the
same energy curve (Fig. 3).
• For trajectories where the orbit flips, the ec-
centricity becomes extremely high, and as time
evolves, the maximum eccentricity reached ap-
proaches closer and closer to unity. That is because
θ0 becomes
every time θ crosses through zero,
very small. And given enough zero-crossings, the
smallest θ0 reached becomes arbitrarily small, and
hence the maximum eccentricity becomes arbitrar-
ily close to unity (as determined by Eq. [12]).
• The vertical angular momentum Jz varies gradu-
ally in the EKM, unlike in the SKM where it is
constant. Its evolution controls that of both θ and
e (Fig. 4). Even when the value of is small,
and hence the temporal evolution of Jz is slow, if
Jz crosses through zero, the dramatic flipping and
extreme eccentricity behavior occurs (Fig. 3, left
panel).
• Chaotic behavior occurs when the Kozai separatrix
is crossed. In that case, ω transitions from librating
to circulating, and back. See also Holman et al.
(1997).
• Surfaces of section, taken whenever ω = 2nπ, pro-
vide an graphical global map of the dynamics.
Each energy curve gives rise to two panels in Fig-
ure 6 (top and bottom). By stepping through the
energy curves, one acquires a complete map of the
dynamics for a given value of . From the sur-
faces of section, one can immediately see which or-
bits exhibit flipping and extreme eccentricity, and
which do not. One can also see which orbits are
chaotic and which are not. All four combinations
occur: flipping and non-chaotic ('a'), flipping and
chaotic, non-flipping and non-chaotic, non-flipping
and chaotic ('b').
• Figure 7 is the main result of this paper. For each
, it gives the curve in the e0-θ0 plane at which the
first flipping orbit occurs (along with the accompa-
nying extreme-eccentricity behavior). Above the
curve no flipping orbits occur, and below it an in-
creasing number occur. There is a fairly sharp tran-
sition in the smallest inclination at which orbits
can flip. For ∼ 0.01, the inclination must exceed
∼ 80◦ to flip (for prograde orbits with e0 = 0); but
when ∼ 0.03, it need only exceed ∼ 60◦, implying
that around half of randomly oriented test particle
orbis will flip in that case.
We have made a number of approximations in order
to simplify the analysis. First, we work under the sec-
ular octupole approximation, which is poor when is
too large because in that case the particle comes close
to the planet. We have made a few comparisons with
direct integrations, some of which are presented in Naoz
et al. (2011b). Thus far the agreement is quite good, but
more should be done to determine the domain of valid-
ity of the secular octupole approximation. Second, we
take the inner orbiting body to be massless. While that
is appropriate for a planet being forced by a companion
star, it is not for two planets, which is the main motiva-
tion for this paper (Naoz et al. 2011a). We are currently
extending the work presented here to two massive plan-
ets; in that case, there is a generalized that includes
the masses (Naoz et al. 2011b). And third, we ignore
all physical effects beyond Newtonian gravity, including
tides and general relativistic precession. These will play
a role when the inner planet's eccentricity approaches
unity.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank W. Farr, B. Katz, F. Rasio, J. Teyssandier,
and Y. Wu for helpful discussions. SN acknowledges
support from the Gruber Foundation Fellowship and
from the National Postdoctoral Award Program for
Advancing Women in Science (Weizmann Institute of
Science).
Blaes, O., Lee, M. H., & Socrates, A. 2002, ApJ, 578, 775
Eggleton, P. P. & Kiseleva-Eggleton, L. 2001, ApJ, 562, 1012
Fabrycky, D. & Tremaine, S. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1298
Ford, E. B., Kozinsky, B., & Rasio, F. A. 2000, ApJ, 535, 385
-- . 2004, ApJ, 605, 966
REFERENCES
Harrington, R. S. 1968, PhD thesis, THE UNIVERSITY OF
TEXAS AT AUSTIN.
-- . 1969, Celestial Mechanics, 1, 200
Holman, M., Touma, J., & Tremaine, S. 1997, Nature, 386, 254
Kozai, Y. 1962, AJ, 67, 591
Krymolowski, Y. & Mazeh, T. 1999, MNRAS, 304, 720
Laskar, J. & Bou´e, G. 2010, A&A, 522, A60+
Lidov, M. L. & Ziglin, S. L. 1976, Celestial Mechanics, 13, 471
Marchal, C. 1990, The three-body problem, ed. Marchal, C.
Murray, C. D. & Dermott, S. F. 2000, Solar System Dynamics
(Cambridge University Press)
Naoz, S., Farr, W. M., Lithwick, Y., Rasio, F. A., & Teyssandier,
J. 2011a, Nature, 473, 187
7
-- . 2011b, submitted
Thompson, T. A. 2010, ArXiv e-prints
Triaud, A. H. M. J., Collier Cameron, A., Queloz, D., Anderson,
D. R., Gillon, M., Hebb, L., Hellier, C., Loeillet, B., Maxted,
P. F. L., Mayor, M., Pepe, F., Pollacco, D., S´egransan, D.,
Smalley, B., Udry, S., West, R. G., & Wheatley, P. J. 2010,
A&A, 524, A25+
Wu, Y. & Murray, N. 2003, ApJ, 589, 605
OCTUPOLE SECULAR EQUATIONS OF MOTION FOR A TEST PARTICLE
The secular interaction energy between an interior and exterior planet (unprimed and primed, respectively) can be
APPENDIX
written as
Eeon = −GN
mm(cid:48)
a(cid:48) α2f (α, e(cid:48), e, g(cid:48), g, θ) ,
(A1)
where θ ≡ cos I and the other quantities are the mutual inclination I, argument of periapse g, eccentricity e, semimajor
axis a, ratio of semimajor axes (inner to outer) α, mass m, and Newton's constant GN . (The notation here differs
slightly from the body of the paper in order to connect to previous treatments of the octupole. See footnote 3 for the
relation between the two notations.) The subscript "eon" refers to the elimination of the nodes, i.e. the longitudes of
ascending nodes (h, h(cid:48)) have been chosen to satisfy h − h(cid:48) = π which is why they do not appear in the energy.
We seek the equations of motion for the inner planet in the limit that m → 0. The equations of motion can be
expressed as Hamilton's equations for the canonical Delaunay variables {g, G; h, H} where
G ≡ m
GN M∗a
1 − e2 , H ≡ G cos i ,
(A2)
(cid:112)
(cid:112)
with M∗ the mass of the central star. Note that in secular theory, a is constant; note also that in the test particle
limit, i = I.
Setting the Hamiltonian H = Eeon will give the correct equations of motion of g, G, and h, but not for H because
the nodes have been eliminated (Naoz et al. 2011b). We shall prove that the correct procedure for obtaining the
Hamiltonian is simply to replace g(cid:48) → π − h in the above expression for Eeon, as well as e(cid:48) =const., e2 → 1 −
G2/(m2GN M(cid:12)a), and θ → H/G. The relation g(cid:48) → π − h might appear surprising because one might have expected
that g(cid:48) =const when the inner particle is massless. But in truth h(cid:48) is undefined because the reference plane is aligned
with the outer orbit. Therefore, the outer planet must only have g(cid:48) + h(cid:48)=const, and we may choose without loss of
generality the constant to equal zero. Hence, elimination of the nodes implies g(cid:48) = π − h
Our proof is based on the triangle equality G2 + G(cid:48)2 + 2GG(cid:48)θ = (H + H(cid:48))2, which expresses the square of the vertical
angular momentum in two equivalent ways. Taking the time derivative of the triangle equality, and noting that both
G and G(cid:48) satisfy Hamilton's equations, i.e. dG/dt = −∂Eeon/∂g and dG(cid:48)/dt = −∂Eeon/∂g(cid:48), we find that to leading
dt Gθ, i.e. dH/dt = ∂Eeon/∂g(cid:48) which proves that if we replace g(cid:48) → π − h in Eeon, we will end
order in m, dG(cid:48)/dt = − d
up with the correct Hamilton equation for H.
Proof
Equations of Motion
We may re-scale all momenta by an arbitrary constant without changing the equations of motion as long as we
rescale the Hamiltonian by the same constant. Therefore defining
√
m
J ≡
G
GN M∗a
Jz ≡ J cos I ≡ θ
(cid:112)
≡(cid:112)
1 − e2
1 − e2 ,
the rescaled Hamiltonian is
H(J, g; Jz, h)≡
√
Eeon
GN M∗a
m
=− m(cid:48)
Ω∗α3f (α, e(cid:48), e, g(cid:48), g, θ) ,
M∗
where Ω∗ is the orbital angular speed of the test particle around the star.
(A3)
(A4)
(A5)
(A6)
8
The expression for f (defined via eq.
their Equation (22) in the limit m, m(cid:48) (cid:28) M∗ as
[A1]) is derived, e.g., in Ford et al. (2000) to octupole order. We re-express
f =
3
8
1
(1 − e
(cid:48)2)3/2
αe(cid:48)
1 − e
(A7)
where Fqu and Foc are displayed above (Eqs. 10 and 11, with g ≡ ω and h ≡ Ω) after correcting the sign of the
octupole term (Ford et al. 2004) and replacing g(cid:48) → π − h
(cid:48)2 Foc) ,
(Fqu +
The equations of motion are Hamilton's equations for Hamiltonian (A6). These are displayed explicitly in the body
of the paper (Eqs. [4]-[7]) after defining the rescaled time
t ≡ T × m(cid:48)
M∗
Ω∗α3 3
8
1
(1 − e
(cid:48)2)3/2
,
(A8)
where T is the true time.
|
1605.01682 | 1 | 1605 | 2016-05-05T18:34:16 | Maps of Evolving Cloud Structures in Luhman 16AB from HST Time-Resolved Spectroscopy | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | WISE J104915.57-531906.1 is the nearest brown dwarf binary to our Solar system, consisting of two brown dwarfs in the L/T transition: Luhman 16A & B. In this paper we present the first map of Luhman 16A, and maps of Luhman 16B for two epochs. Our maps were created by applying Aeolus, a Markov-Chain Monte Carlo code that maps the top-of-the-atmosphere structure of brown dwarf and other ultracool atmospheres, to light curves of Luhman 16A & B using the Hubble Space Telescope's G141 and G102 grisms. Aeolus retrieved three or four spots in the top-of-the-atmosphere of Luhman 16A & B, with a surface coverage of 19%-32% (depending on an assumed rotational period of 5 hr or 8 hr) or 21%-38.5% (depending on the observational epoch) respectively. The brightness temperature of the spots of the best-fit models was ~200 K hotter than the background top-of-the-atmosphere. We compared our Luhman 16B map with the only previously published map. Interestingly, our map contained a large, cooler (DT~51 K) than the background top-of-the-atmosphere spot that lay at low latitudes, in agreement with the previous Luhman 16B map. Finally, we report the detection of a feature reappearing in Luhman 16B light curves that are separated by tens of hundreds of rotations from each other. We speculate this feature is related to top-of-the-atmosphere structures of Luhman 16B. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | Draft version August 29, 2018
Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 12/16/11
6
1
0
2
y
a
M
5
.
]
P
E
h
p
-
o
r
t
s
a
[
1
v
2
8
6
1
0
.
5
0
6
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
MAPS OF EVOLVING CLOUD STRUCTURES IN LUHMAN 16AB FROM HST TIME-RESOLVED
SPECTROSCOPY.
Theodora Karalidi
Steward Observatory, Department of Astronomy, University of Arizona, 933 N. Cherry Ave, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA,
[email protected]
D´aniel Apai
Steward Observatory, Department of Astronomy, The University of Arizona, 933 N. Cherry Ave, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona,1629 E University Blvd, AZ 85721, USA
Earths in Other Solar Systems Team
NASA Ames Research Center, MS-245-3, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
Mark S. Marley
Institute for Astronomy, ETH Zurich, Wolfgang-Pauli-Str. 27, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
Esther Buenzli
Draft version August 29, 2018
ABSTRACT
WISE J104915.57-531906.1 is the nearest brown dwarf binary to our Solar system, consisting of two
brown dwarfs in the L/T transition: Luhman 16A & B. In this paper we present the first map of
Luhman 16A, and maps of Luhman 16B for two epochs. Our maps were created by applying Aeolus,
a Markov -- Chain Monte Carlo code that maps the top -- of -- the -- atmosphere (TOA) structure of brown
dwarf and other ultracool atmospheres, to light curves of Luhman 16A & B using the Hubble Space
Telescope's G141 and G102 grisms. Aeolus retrieved three or four spots in the top -- of -- the -- atmosphere
of Luhman 16A & B, with a surface coverage of 19% -- 32% (depending on an assumed rotational period
of 5 hr or 8 hr) or 21% -- 38.5% (depending on the observational epoch) respectively. The brightness
temperature of the spots of the best -- fit models was ∼200 K hotter than the background TOA. We
Interestingly, our map
compared our Luhman 16B map with the only previously published map.
contained a large, cooler (∆T ∼ 51 K) than the background TOA spot that lay at low latitudes,
in agreement with the previous Luhman 16B map. Finally, we report the detection of a feature
reappearing in Luhman 16B light curves that are separated by tens of hundreds of rotations from each
other. We speculate this feature is related to TOA structures of Luhman 16B.
Subject headings: methods: statistical - techniques: photometric - stars: WISE J104915.57-531906.1
1.
INTRODUCTION
WISE J104915.57-531906.1, also known as Luhman
16AB (Luhman 2013), is the nearest brown dwarf binary
to our Solar system, at a distance of 1.9980 ± 0.0004 pc
(Sahlmann & Lazorenko 2015). Luhman 16AB is com-
posed of two brown dwarfs in the L/T transition: Luh-
man 16A, an L8 ± 1 [L7.5] dwarf and Luhman 16B a
T1.5 ± 2 [T0.5] dwarf (Kniazev et al. (2013) [Burgasser
et al. (2013)]). Luhman 16B has a rotational period of
4.87±0.01 hr (Gillon et al. 2013), or 5.05±0.10 hr (Bur-
gasser et al. 2014), and an inclination i < 30◦ (Crossfield
et al. 2014). Buenzli et al. (2015b) using HST observa-
tions, reported a rotational period between 4.5 and 5.5 hr
for Luhman 16A, while ground-based, spatially resolved
observations by Mancini et al. (2015) suggested a longer,
∼ 8 hr rotational period. The latter, is longer than the
maximum rotational period suggested by v sin i obser-
vations by Crossfield et al. (2014), assuming a ∼1RJup
radius (see, Buenzli et al. 2015b). Luhman 16A has a yet
undefined inclination. Faherty et al. (2014) using bolo-
metric luminosities found that the two components have
a similar Tef f (Luhman 16A: 1310±30K and Luhman
16B: 1280±75K), consistent with previous observations
by Kniazev et al. (2013).
Gillon et al. (2013) performed partially resolved ob-
servations of Luhman 16AB over multiple rotations and
reported strong night -- to -- night variations of the ob-
served light curves and a large peak -- to -- peak amplitude
(∼10%). Resolved observations showed that Luhman
16B is responsible for the observed variability (Biller
et al. 2013; Burgasser et al. 2014; Buenzli et al. 2015a),
while Luhman 16A did not appear variable above ∼0.4%
(see, e.g., Buenzli et al. 2015a). Resolved observations
by Burgasser et al. (2013) showed that both compo-
nents are red and underluminous in the J -- band, sup-
porting the idea that clouds are responsible for the ob-
served light curve variability. Later observations by
Buenzli et al. (2015b) using the Hubble Space Telescope
(HST)/WFC3 G102 grism reported a significant variabil-
ity for both Luhman 16A (peak -- to -- peak amplitude of
∼4.5%) and 16B (peak -- to -- peak amplitude of ∼9.3%),
cautioning about the implications this has to the unam-
biguous characterization of the two components in unre-
solved observations.
2
Radigan et al. (2014) and Radigan (2014) found that
39+16−14% of brown dwarfs in the L/T transition are vari-
able, and showed that high -- amplitude variability ((cid:38) 2%)
is uncommon in the L/T transition (24+11−9 %). Metchev
et al. (2015) reached a similar conclusion showing that
few L/T dwarfs have amplitudes larger than 1% -- 2%.
The fact that both Luhman 16A and B present high --
amplitude variability makes this brown dwarf binary a
unique object. Buenzli et al. (2015b) performed a sta-
tistical analysis and found that the combined probability
for Luhman 16A and B to be both variable is (cid:46) 10%. The
reason why both components present a large amplitude
variability is yet unclear.
Crossfield et al. (2014) used Doppler imaging to pro-
duce the first global map of Luhman 16B. This first map
indicated a complex cloud structure, with darker and
brighter areas across the globe, which Crossfield et al.
(2014) interpreted as observations of thinner and thicker
clouds that allowed the observations to penetrate deeper
or shallower in the atmosphere. This is in agreement
with the general picture suggested by e.g., Apai et al.
(2013) for other early T -- dwarfs.
In Karalidi et al. (2015) we presented Aeolus, a Markov
Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) code that can map the top --
of -- the -- atmosphere (hereafter, TOA) structure of an ul-
tracool atmosphere, per observational wavelength, using
observed rotational light curves. In Section 3 we present
a brief description of Aeolus. For a detailed description of
Aeolus, and its validation, we refer the reader to Karalidi
et al. (2015).
In this paper we used the Luhman 16B light curves
of Buenzli et al. (2015a,b) to map Luhman 16B's TOA
structure integrating over the J -- and H -- bands (cut at
1.66 µm) of the G141 grism and in the complete G102
grism. Using multi-wavelength observations to study an
ultracool atmosphere is a powerful technique that allows
us to probe different layers in the observed atmosphere.
Contribution functions of early T -- dwarfs suggest that
the J -- and H -- band, and the G102 grism probe very sim-
ilar pressure levels (see Section 5). The maps we made
using these bands thus, provide us with hints of the evo-
lution of the atmospheric structure of Luhman 16B be-
tween the two epochs of observations.
Finally, we used the Luhman 16A curves of Buenzli
et al. (2015b) to create the first map of the TOA struc-
ture of Luhamn 16A. We created two maps for Luhman
16A, using the two proposed rotational rates by Buen-
zli et al. (2015b) and Mancini et al. (2015). Using our
adapted version of Aeolus (see Sect. 3) we constrained
the inclination of Luhman 16A for the two rotational pe-
riods.
This paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2 we present
the dataset we use in this paper. In Sect. 3 we introduce,
briefly, Aeolus. In Sect. 4 we present the Principal com-
ponent analysis results of Buenzli et al. (2015a,b).
In
Sects. 5 and 6 we present Aeolus maps of Luhman 16B
and 16A respectively. Finally, in Sect. 7 we present a
discussion of our results and in Sect. 8 we present our
conclusions.
2. DATA
Luhman 16AB was observed on 2013 November 8 with
HST/WFC3 with the G141 grism (from 1.1 to 1.66 µm)
Summary of observations used in this paper.
TABLE 1
Original Paper
Epoch Date of observations Band
2013 Nov. 8
2013 Nov. 8
2014 Nov. 23
J
H
Buenzli et al. (2015a)
Buenzli et al. (2015a)
Buenzli et al. (2015b)
1
1
2
G102
by Buenzli et al. (2015a), and on 2014 November 23 with
HST/WFC3 with the G102 grism (from 0.8 to 1.15 µm)
by Buenzli et al. (2015b). For a detailed description of
the observations and data reduction we refer the reader
to Buenzli et al. (2015a,b). Each set of observations cov-
ered approximately 1.5 rotations of Luhman 16B. In Ta-
ble 1 we summarize the observations we used in this pa-
per.
Fig. 1 shows the Luhman 16 B light curves derived by
integrating counts of Buenzli et al. (2015a) in the J -- (red
blocks) and H -- (green triangles) bands (top panel), and
of Buenzli et al. (2015b) over the complete G102 grism
(orange triangles, bottom panel). We note that Luhman
16B has a very rapidly evolving atmosphere, and we can
detect evolution in the light curves from the first to the
second rotation on the 2013 observations, and from the
2013, J -- and H -- band light curves to the 2014 G102 light
curve.
Finally, Fig. 2 shows the Luhman 16A curves derived
by integrating counts over the complete G102 grism
(Buenzli et al. 2015b), assuming a rotational period of
8 hr (grey blocks) and 5 hr (orange stars). The J --
band (magenta triangles) light curve from Buenzli et al.
(2015a) is also plotted for comparison.
3. AEOLUS
We mapped Luhman 16B using Aeolus. Aeolus is
an MCMC code that combines a Gibbs sampler with
a random -- walk Metropolis -- within -- Gibbs algorithm to
map the TOA (per observational wavelength) structure
of ultracool atmospheres (Karalidi et al. 2015). Aeolus
assumes that variations in the observed light curves are
due to elliptical, spot -- like features (see, Karalidi et al.
2015) and fits the number of spots as a free parameter.
For every spot, Aeolus fits the position (longitude and
latitude), angular size, and contrast ratio to the back-
ground TOA.
In this paper we allowed the contrast ratio of every spot
to the background to vary between 0.01 and 2.0, and set
the maximum allowed number of spots to 7. We var-
ied Aeolus in comparison to (Karalidi et al. 2015) to fit
the inclination and limb darkening of our target as extra
free parameters. As discussed in Karalidi et al. (2015),
since there is no intrinsic reason why Aeolus should pre-
fer specific values of the parameters it fits (longitude,
latitude, size and contrast ratio) over others, we assign
a uniform prior (p(x) ∼ 1) over their respective param-
eter ranges. We assume that the observational errors
are nearly Gaussian, with known variances, and adopt a
normal likelihood distribution (p(dx) ∼exp[-χ2(x )/2]).
For every light curve we ran eight chains of 5,000,000
steps each. Removal of possible biases rising from our
selection of initial conditions was done by removing the
first 500,000 steps (10%) of the chains (see Karalidi et al.
2015, and references therein). The choice of the best fit-
ting model finally took into account the minimization
of the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) (Schwarz
3
1978). When comparing two models the one with the
smaller BIC is preferred. If the BIC of the two models
is the same, the model with the fewer free parameters is
preferred. As in Karalidi et al. (2015), to control that
the solution on which our MCMC chains converged did
not depend on our initial guesses, we used different initial
condition for each chain and used the Gelman & Rubin R
criterion to control the convergence of the chains (Gel-
man & Rubin 1992). To accept a solution we checked
that R is always less than 1.2. Finally, we kept our sam-
ple size N larger than the number of our fitted parame-
ters κ (200 (cid:38) N/κ (cid:38) 40). For a detailed description of
Aeolus we refer the reader to Karalidi et al. (2015).
4. SINGLE SPOT -- COMPONENT MODEL
Buenzli et al. (2015a,b) performed a Principal Com-
ponent Analysis (PCA) on their data to determine
the minimum number of
independent spectral com-
ponents necessary to reproduce their observed spec-
tra. They concluded that for both sets of observa-
tions the observed spectral variability could be mostly
characterized by a single component,
implying that
only two significant discrete photospheric structures (a
"background" and a "heterogeneity") defined the TOA
structure of these brown dwarfs. A similar conclu-
sion was reached for 2MASSJ21392676+0220226 and
2MASSJ0136565+093347 by Apai et al. (2013).
We assumed that the "heterogeneity" component of
the TOA is structured in the shape of elliptical, spot --
like features (see Sect. 3). We then assumed that the
fact that all possible spots are dominated by one spec-
tral component implies that their temperature difference
to the background TOA was similar. Assuming that any
brightness variations mapped by Aeolus are due to the
different temperatures of the areas observed, this implied
that the contrast ratios of all the spots retrieved by Ae-
olus should be similar. We thus adapted Aeolus to keep
the contrast ratio of all (possible) spots the same.
5. LUHMAN 16B
We initially applied Aeolus on the Luhman 16B light
curves of Fig. 1. These light curves cover approximately
1.3 to 1.4 rotations of Luhman 16B. The atmosphere of
Luhman 16B appears to be highly active, causing the
light curves to evolve already within one complete rota-
tion (see, e.g., the change of the light curve shape be-
tween a rotational phase of 0.1 to 0.3 and 1.1 to 1.3 on
the top panel of Fig. 1). For this reason we split the
light curves and fitted only the first complete rotation
(rotational phase 0. to 1.).
Here we present the maps Aeolus derived for the two
epochs. We followed Karalidi et al. (2015), and assumed
that brightness variations across the TOA are due to the
different temperature of the areas observed. We thus
used the retrieved contrast ratios to calculate brightness
temperature variations across the TOA.
Aeolus retrieved an inclination of 26◦ ± 8◦ for Luhman
16B, in agreement with Crossfield et al. (2014) observa-
tions that suggested an inclination i < 30◦.
5.1. First epoch maps
Fig. 3 (top four panels) shows the brightness temper-
ature map of Luhman 16B in the J -- band. Aeolus re-
trieved three spots (BIC∼25.9 vs 41.4 for two spots)
Fig. 1. -- Luhman 16B light curves from Buenzli et al. (2015a)
and Buenzli et al. (2015b), assuming a rotational period of 5.05 hr
(Burgasser et al. 2014). Top panel: 2013 November 8, HST/WFC3
light curves in the J -- (red blocks) and H -- (green triangles) bands.
Bottom panel: 2014 November 23, HST/WFC3, G102 light curves
over the complete G102 grism (orange arrows). The J -- band (red
blocks) light curve is also plotted for comparison, shifted so that
the trough around a rotational phase of 0.6 match.
Fig. 2. -- Luhman 16A HST/WFC3, G102 light curve from Buen-
zli et al. (2015b) (epoch 2) assuming a rotational period of 8 hr
(grey blocks) and 5 hr (orange stars). The J -- band (magenta tri-
angles) light curve from Buenzli et al. (2015a) (epoch 1) is over --
plotted for comparison.
Luhman 16B0.00.51.01.5Time/Period0.9200.9450.9901.0051.060Normalized fluxJ-band; epoch 1J-band; epoch 1H-band; epoch 1H-band; epoch 1Luhman 16B0.00.51.01.5Time/Period0.9200.9450.9901.0051.060Normalized fluxJ-band; epoch 1J-band; epoch 1G102; epoch 2G102; epoch 2Luhman 16A0.00.51.01.5Time/Period0.9200.9450.9901.0051.060Normalized fluxG102, P=8 hr; epoch 2G102, P=8 hr; epoch 2G102, P=5 hr; epoch 2G102, P=5 hr; epoch 2J-band, P=5 hr; epoch 1J-band, P=5 hr; epoch 1 4
with (longitude, latitude) = (113.47◦ ± 6.46◦, 31◦ ± 6◦),
(186.08◦ ± 3.65◦, 45◦ ± 12◦) and (283◦ ± 13◦, 72◦ ± 10◦)
and respective sizes of 38.89◦ ± 0.80◦, 24.45◦ ± 1.46◦ and
35.54◦ ± 1.67◦. Assuming a background TOA tempera-
ture of 1280 K (Faherty et al. 2014), the retrieved spots
had a temperature difference to the background TOA
∆T ∼ 231 ± 16 K.
In Fig. 4 (top panel) we show the normalized J -- band
light curve (stars) with error bars and the best-fit Aeo-
lus curve (black line). In Fig. 4 (bottom panel) we show
the corresponding residuals. The best-fit 2 -- spots Aeolus
curve (red dashed -- dotted line) is also shown for compar-
ison. In Fig. 5 we show sample posterior distributions for
the longitude of spot 3, the inclination of Luhman 16B
(based on the J -- band light curve) and the inclination of
Luhman 16A assuming a rotational period of 5 hr.
To control the robustness of our results, and to take
advantage of the complete light curve, we applied again
Aeolus on the J -- band light curve between a rotational
phase of 0.2 to ∼1.2. For a direct comparison with the
previous fit, we present the longitudes shifted by ∼ 70◦
(rotational phase of 0.2). Aeolus retrieved three spots
(BIC∼60 vs 71 for two spots) with (longitude, latitude)
= (192◦ ± 12◦, 30◦ ± 15◦), (287◦ ± 12◦, 60◦ ± 12◦) and
(376◦ ± 8◦, −10◦ ± 13◦), and respective sizes of 26◦ ±
1◦, 37◦ ± 1◦ and 15.5◦ ± 1.4◦. The properties of the
first two spots were in agreement with two spots of the
previous fit. The third spot Aeolus retrieved did not
match the properties of the "first spot" of the previous
fit (with longitude of 113.47◦ ± 6.46◦), hinting to the
rapid evolution of the TOA structure of Luhman 16B.
Fig. 3 (bottom four panels) shows the brightness tem-
perature map of Luhman 16B in the H -- band. Aeo-
lus retrieved three spots (BIC∼24 vs 42 for four spots)
with (longitude, latitude) = (107.27◦ ± 5.48◦, 28◦ ± 8◦),
(190.91◦ ± 4.83◦, 50◦ ± 20◦) and (288.6◦ ± 9.4◦, 74◦ ± 6◦)
and respective sizes of 32.42◦ ± 0.80◦, 25.02◦ ± 1.13◦ and
36.30◦ ± 1.18◦. Assuming a background TOA tempera-
ture of 1280 K, the retrieved spots had a ∆T ∼ 211± 16
K to the background TOA.
5.2. Second epoch map
Fig. 6 shows the brightness temperature map of Luh-
man 16B in the G102 grism. Aeolus retrieved 4 spots
(BIC 45 vs 61.7 for three spots) with (longitude, latitude)
= (87◦±7◦, 0◦±20◦), (154◦±18◦, 28◦±12◦), (233◦±16◦,
40◦ ± 12◦) and (355◦ ± 15◦, 63◦ ± 8◦) and respective
sizes of 37.63◦ ± 0.92◦, 39.56◦ ± 1.89◦, 35.87◦ ± 2.10◦ and
13.11◦ ± 0.89◦. Assuming a background TOA tempera-
ture of 1280 K, the retrieved spots had a ∆T ∼ 119 ± 6
K to the background TOA. .
In Table 2 we summarize the corresponding number of
spots of the maps Aeolus retrieved. For a direct compar-
ison of the retrieved maps Fig. 7 shows the 2013 J -- (top
panel) and H -- (middle panel) maps, and the 2014 G102
map (bottom panel) in an equirectangular projection.
Note that the temperature differences retrieved for
the spots in both epochs are comparable to the 200 --
300K temperature difference reported between the best --
fit models of Buenzli et al. (2015a,b), and to the
Thot-Tcold brightness temperature difference reported
by Burgasser et al. (2014). These temperature dif-
ferences are also comparable to the temperature dif-
ference Apai et al. (2013) retrieved for the spots
Fig. 3. -- Luhman 16B brightness temperature maps from apply-
ing Aeolus on the J -- (top four panels) and the H -- band (bottom
four panels) light curves of Fig. 1. The maps are centered at 0◦
of longitude (upper left map), 90◦ of longitude (upper right map),
180◦ of longitude (lower left map) and 270◦ of longitude (lower
right map).
Fig. 4. -- Top panel: Normalized J -- band light curve of Luhman
16B (stars) with error bars and best fit Aeolus curve (black solid
line). Note that the error bars are smaller than the symbols. Also
plotted is the best fit 2-spot model (red dashed -- dotted line) for
comparison. Bottom panel: corresponding residuals.
Luhman 16B - J-band (2013)l=0°l=90°l=180°l=270°1600.1450.1300.1150.1000.Brightness Temperature (K)Luhman 16B - H-band (2013)l=0°l=90°l=180°l=270°1600.1450.1300.1150.1000.Brightness Temperature (K)0.00.20.40.60.81.0Time/Period0.900.951.001.05Normalized flux0.00.20.40.60.81.0Time/Period-0.010.000.01Residuals 5
Fig. 6. -- Same as Fig. 3, but using the G102 grism light curve.
Fig. 5. -- Top panel: Sample posterior distribution for the lon-
gitude of spot 3 of Luhman 16B (J -- band). Middle panel: Sample
posterior distribution for the inclination of Luhman 16B (J -- band).
Bottom panel: Sample posterior distribution for the inclination of
Luhman 16A (P= 5 hr).
TABLE 2
Number of spots of the corresponding maps Aeolus
retrieved for the TOA of Luhman 16B per observational
band and epoch.
Epoch Band Number of spots
1
1
2
J
H
G102
3
3
4
on two other brown dwarfs in the L/T transition
SIMP0136 and 2M2139 (2MASSJ0136565+093347 and
2MASSJ21392676+0220226 respectively).
6. LUHMAN 16A
Fig. 7. -- Luhman 16B maps, in an equirectangular projection,
based on the J -- band (top panel) and H -- band (middle panel) light
curves on 2013, and the G102 grism light curve on 2014 (bottom
panel). The assumed background TOA brightness temperature
(Tbg) and the retrieved brightness temperature of the spots (Tsp)
is shown in every panel.
Buenzli et al. (2015b) observed variability in the at-
mosphere of Luhman 16A, with its rotational light curve
showing a peak -- to -- peak amplitude of ∼4.5% (see bot-
tom panel of Fig. 1), allowing us to map Luhman 16A
with Aeolus.
We initially assumed a rotational period of 5 hr, fol-
lowing Buenzli et al. (2015b). As discussed in Crossfield
et al. (2014), a similar rotational period for Luhman 16B
and 16A would imply that the two brown dwarfs' rota-
tional axes are misaligned. Aeolus retrieved an inclina-
tion of 56◦ ± 5◦.
Fig. 8 (top four panels) shows the brightness temper-
ature map of Luhman 16A assuming a rotational period
of 5 hr. Aeolus retrieved three spots (BIC∼24.2 vs 37.5
for two spots) with (longitude, latitude) = (115◦ ± 8◦,
32◦± 10◦), (0◦± 8◦, 43◦± 8◦) and (287◦± 18◦, 74◦± 10◦)
and respective sizes of 37.72◦ ± 6.96◦, 35.65◦ ± 1.10◦ and
36.34◦ ± 1.21◦. Assuming a background TOA tempera-
ture of 1310 K (Faherty et al. 2014), the retrieved spots
had a temperature difference to the background TOA of
216 ± 5 K. In Fig. 9 we show the normalized G102 light
060120180240300360Longitude(deg)0.1040.2090.3140.419Percentage of counts (%)-90-45045900.000 28 56-90-4504590Inclination (deg)0 00Percentage of counts (%)-90-45045900.0020.941.3-90-4504590Inclination (deg)0.0020.941.3Percentage of counts (%)Luhman 16B - G102 (2014)l=0°l=90°l=180°l=270°1600.1450.1300.1150.1000.Brightness Temperature (K)J-band; 2013Tbg = 1280 KTsp = 1510 KTbg = 1280 KTsp = 1399 KLatitude (deg)900-90Longitude (deg)060120180240300360Latitude (deg)900-90Latitude (deg)900-90H-band; 2013G102; 2014Tbg = 1280 KTsp = 1510 KLuhman 16B 6
Fig. 9. -- Top panel: Normalized G102 light curve of Luhman
16A with a 8 hr rotational period (stars), with error bars and best
fit Aeolus curve (black solid line). Note that the error bars are
smaller than the symbols. Middle panel: corresponding residuals.
Bottom panel: Normalized light curves showing the contribution
of each one of the four spots for our best-fit model.
Fig. 8. -- Luhman 16A brightness temperature maps from apply-
ing Aeolus on the HST/WFC3, G102 light curves of Fig. 1 (bottom
panel), assuming a rotational period of 5 hr (top four panels), or
8 hr (top four panels). The maps are centered at 0◦ of longitude
(upper left map), 90◦ of longitude (upper right map), 180◦ of lon-
gitude (lower left map) and 270◦ of longitude (lower right map).
curve of Luhman 16A (stars) with error bars and the
best-fit Aeolus curve (top panel), and the corresponding
residuals (middle panel).
We then assumed a rotational period of 8 hr, following
Mancini et al. (2015). Mancini et al. (2015) performed
spatially resolved, ground -- based observations of Luhman
16AB over sixteen consecutive nights to estimate the ro-
tational period of both components. Using a Gaussian
process model and a MCMC analysis they retrieved a
preferred period of 8 hr for Luhman 16A. However, they
noted that a wide range of rotational periods are consis-
tent with their data. Aeolus retrieved an inclination of
18◦ ± 8◦, in agreement with the retrieved Luhman 16B
inclination. As discussed in Crossfield et al. (2014), a
different rotational period for Luhman 16A and B would
allow the rotational axes of the two brown dwarfs to be
aligned, as Aeolus retrieved.
Fig. 8 (bottom four panels) shows the brightness tem-
perature map of Luhman 16A assuming a rotational pe-
riod of 8 hr. Aeolus retrieved four spots (BIC∼21.6
latitude) =
vs 31.8 for three spots) with (longitude,
hr (top panel), or 8 hr (bottom panel).
Fig. 10. -- Luhman 16A maps assuming a rotational period of 5
(191.92◦ ± 16.23◦, 50◦ ± 8◦), (243◦ ± 10◦, −24◦ ± 10◦),
(318◦±20◦, 6◦±20◦) and (40◦±6◦, 12◦±20◦) and respec-
tive sizes of 38.67◦ ± 0.57◦, 39.44◦ ± 1.63◦, 28.88◦ ± 1.16◦
and 36.37◦ ± 1.23◦. Assuming a background TOA tem-
perature of 1310 K (Faherty et al. 2014), the retrieved
spots had a temperature difference to the background
TOA of 238 ± 10 K. Table 3 summarizes the properties
of all spots Aeolus retrieved at the TOA of Luhman 16A
and B, per observational band and epoch.
7. DISCUSSION
7.1. Comparison of Aeolus map with previously
published Luhman 16B map.
Crossfield et al. (2014) mapped Luhman 16B using
Doppler imaging and found a complex map, with both
brighter and darker than the background TOA cloud
patches (see bottom panel of Fig. 11). This contradicts
the PCA analysis of Buenzli et al. (2015a,b) that found
that only one kind of cloud patches/spots is necessary to
explain the variability of the observed spectra. Given the
Luhman 16A - 5 hrl=0°l=90°l=180°l=270°1600.1450.1300.1150.1000.Brightness Temperature (K)Luhman 16A - 8 hrl=0°l=90°l=180°l=270°1600.1450.1300.1150.1000.Brightness Temperature (K) 0.900.951.001.051.10Normalized flux -0.010.000.01Residuals0.00.20.40.60.81.0Time/Period0.81.01.21.4Normalized fluxNormalized FluxNormalized FluxResiduals-Time/ PeriodLuhman 16AP = 5 hrP = 8 hrTbg = 1310 KTsp = 1526 KTbg = 1310 KTsp = 1526 KLatitude (deg)900-90Latitude (deg)900-90Longitude (deg)060120180240300360 Properties of the spots Aeolus retrieved at the TOA of Luhman 16A and B per observational band and epoch.
TABLE 3
7
Target
Luhman 16A
Period (hr) Epoch Band
G102
5
2
Luhman 16A
8
Luhman 16B
5.05
Luhman 16B
5.05
Luhman 16B
5.05
2
1
1
2
G102
J
H
G102
191.92◦ ± 16.23◦
Longitdue
115◦ ± 8◦
0◦ ± 8◦
287◦ ± 18◦
243◦ ± 10◦
40◦ ± 6◦
318◦ ± 20◦
Latitude
32◦ ± 10◦
43◦ ± 8◦
74◦ ± 10◦
50◦ ± 8◦
−24◦ ± 10◦
12◦ ± 20◦
6◦ ± 20◦
113.47◦ ± 6.46◦ −20◦ ± 12◦
45◦ ± 12◦
186.08◦ ± 3.65◦
72◦ ± 10◦
107.27◦ ± 5.48◦
−18◦ ± 8◦
51◦ ± 20◦
190.91◦ ± 4.83◦
288.6◦ ± 9.4◦
74◦ ± 6◦
0◦ ± 20◦
87◦ ± 7◦
28◦ ± 12◦
154◦ ± 18◦
233◦ ± 16◦
40◦ ± 12◦
355◦ ± 15◦
63◦ ± 8◦
283◦ ± 13◦
Size
37.72◦ ± 6.96◦
35.65◦ ± 1.10◦
36.34◦ ± 1.21◦
38.67◦ ± 0.57◦
39.44◦ ± 1.63◦
36.37◦ ± 1.23◦
28.88◦ ± 1.16◦
38.89◦ ± 0.80◦
24.45◦ ± 1.46◦
35.54◦ ± 1.67◦
32.42◦ ± 0.80◦
25.02◦ ± 1.13◦
36.30◦ ± 1.18◦
37.63◦ ± 0.92◦
39.56◦ ± 1.89◦
35.87◦ ± 2.10◦
13.11◦ ± 0.89◦
Temperature Contrast
216 ± 5 K
216 ± 5 K
216 ± 5 K
238 ± 10 K
238 ± 10 K
238 ± 10 K
238 ± 10 K
231 ± 16 K
231 ± 16 K
231 ± 16 K
211 ± 16 K
211 ± 16 K
211 ± 16 K
119 ± 6 K
119 ± 6 K
119 ± 6 K
119 ± 6 K
night -- to -- night variability of Luhman 16B's light curves
one could argue that the observed difference could be due
to the ∼0.5 year between the Crossfield et al. (2014) and
Buenzli et al. (2015a) observations. However, the Buen-
zli et al. (2015a) and Buenzli et al. (2015b) observations
were taken ∼1 year apart and the PCA analysis of the
two datasets were in agreement. Crossfield et al. (2014)
observed Luhman 16B in the CO absorption lines in the
K -- band, probing lower pressure levels in the Luhman
16B atmosphere than the G141 and G102 grism observa-
tions of Buenzli et al. (2015a,b) (∼0.94 bar versus ∼2.7
bar, see Fig. 12). The different pressure levels probed
could explain the difference between the mixed -- spot map
of Crossfield et al. (2014) and the single -- temperature --
spot maps implied by the PCA analysis of Buenzli et al.
(2015a,b). However, this could imply that different
mechanisms rule the formation of spots in the deeper and
upper atmosphere (blocking or allowing the formation of
brighter and darker spots, respectively). Note that in a
Doppler imaging map brighter/darker spots could also
be caused by variations in the atmospheric abundances
across the TOA. Assuming that some of these features
could indicate abundance variations, rather than cloud,
heterogeneities could explain the difference between the
PCA analysis and the Crossfield et al. (2014) mixed-spot
map. However, HST spectral mapping by Buenzli et al.
(2015a,b) showed no evidence for abundance variations
in the G102 and G141 grism.
For a direct comparison of our maps with the Crossfield
et al. (2014) map (hereafter C14 map) we again applied
Aeolus on the J -- band light curve of Fig. 1, this time
allowing Aeolus to fit the contrast ratio of every spot
independently of the others. Aeolus retrieved four spots
(BIC∼38.9) with (longitude, latitude) = (84.72◦ ± 8.83◦,
23◦±8◦), (155.87◦±8.47◦, 42◦±9◦), (227.3◦±8.7◦, 59◦±
6◦) and (301.28◦±8.08◦, 30◦±11◦) and respective sizes of
31.99◦±1.19◦, 20.87◦±1.12◦, 28.85◦±1.16◦ and 36.92◦±
1.14◦. Assuming a background TOA temperature of 1280
K, the retrieved spots had a ∆T ∼ −23 ± 6 K, 38 ± 6
K, 141 ± 6 K and −51 ± 6 K to the background TOA.
Note that the multiple-component model has a larger
BIC than our single -- component model (∼39 vs ∼26), so
the latter would be preferred (by Aeolus) over the former.
Fig. 11 (top and middle panels) shows the brightness
temperature maps of Luhman 16B allowing Aeolus to fit
the contrast ratio of all (possible) spots independently of
the others. The Doppler imaging map of Crossfield et al.
(2014) is also shown for comparison (bottom panel). As
in Crossfield et al. (2014), Aeolus found a mixture of
darker and brighter than the background TOA spots.
We compared the spots Aeolus retrieved with the high-
est signal -- to -- noise -- ratio features of the C14 map (see
Fig. 11). Note though, that the ∼0.5 year between the
Crossfield et al. (2014) and Buenzli et al. (2015a) obser-
vations, in combination with the observed night -- to -- night
evolution of Luhman 16B's light curves (and thus TOA
structure), indicates that, probably, our maps probed
very different features from the C14 map.
An interesting result is that Aeolus retrieved a very
large, dark spot (the largest, and darkest spot in the Ae-
olus map) in agreement with the C14 map, even though
the latter map probed higher altitudes in the atmosphere
(∼0.94 bar versus ∼2.7 bar of our map). Both the Ae-
olus' and the C14 map's darkest spots lay at low lati-
tudes. The spot Aeolus retrieved was ∼ 51 K cooler than
the background TOA and spanned ∼ 37◦ of longitude,
while the spot of the C14 map was ∼ 40 K cooler than
the background TOA (assuming a background tempera-
ture of ∼1450 as in Crossfield et al. (2014)) and spanned
∼ 42◦ − 48◦ of longitude. The brightest spot Aeolus re-
trieved was ∼ 141 K hotter than the background TOA
and lay at mid latitudes, while the brightest spot of the
C14 map was ∼ 26 K hotter than the background TOA
and lay at high latitudes. Finally, the brightest and dark-
est spots Aeolus retrieved lay ∼ 74◦ of longitude apart,
while the brightest and darkest spots of the C14 map lay
∼ 190◦ of longitude apart.
A notable difference between the Aeolus and the C14
maps is that the latter contains latitudinally extensive
cloud patches, while the former contains narrower spots.
The latitudinal extensive patches are intrinsic to the
Doppler imaging maps, since they appear even when the
input maps contain latitudinally narrow spots (compare,
e.g., the input map and the retrieved maps of Unruh &
Collier Cameron (1995), or the input and retrieved maps
of Crossfield et al. (2014) [their Fig. 5]). The latitudinal
8
Fig. 11. -- Top panel: Same as in Fig. 3 (top panels), but allowing
Aeolus to fit the brightness temperature (i.e., contrast ratio) of
every spot independently of the others. Middle panel: Same map
as top panel, but in an equirectangular projection. Bottom panel:
Crossfield et al. (2014) map in an equirectangular projection. Black
contour lines show the features with the highest signal -- to -- noise
ratio (≥ 3): a polar, brighter than the background TOA spot and
a mid-latitude, darker than the background TOA spot.
extensive cloud patches of the C14 maps thus, do not
contradict Aeolus' latitudinally narrower spots.
Another difference between the C14 and the Aeolus
maps is that the former shows more features than the
latter. In Karalidi et al. (2015) we showed that Aeolus
could not detect small scale features of the TOA ((cid:46) 10◦).
However, most of the features in the C14 map are exten-
sive enough for Aeolus to have mapped them. Most of the
features in the C14 map have a very low signal -- to -- noise --
ratio making their detection ambiguous. Some of these
features could be artifacts of the Doppler imaging due to,
e.g., a slightly offset assumed limb darkening or inclina-
tion (see, e.g., Vogt et al. 1987; Unruh & Collier Cameron
1995). Additionally, given that Doppler imaging is also
sensitive to abundance variations across the atmosphere,
these features could indicate abundance, rather than
cloud, heterogeneities. Finally, note again that the time
elapsed between the two observations (Crossfield et al.
(2014) and Buenzli et al. (2015a)) indicates that, prob-
ably, our maps probed very different features from the
C14 map.
7.2. Implications of Aeolus maps for the atmospheres of
Luhman 16A & B.
7.2.1. Wind speeds and characteristic timescales.
Assuming that the maximum spot size retrieved by Ae-
olus is defined by the atmospheric jet size, we can follow
a Rhines -- length -- based argument as in Apai et al. (2013);
Burgasser et al. (2014) and Karalidi et al. (2015) to con-
strain the wind speed on Luhman 16A and B. We assume
that our maps are accurate, and that the retrieved spots
in the TOA are uniform. We additionally assume that
Luhman 16A's and B's radii are equal to one Jupiter ra-
dius (evolutionary models suggest that the radius of Luh-
man 16B, assuming an age between 0.5 Gyr and 5 Gyr, is
∼ 1.0± 0.2 RJup, see Saumon & Marley (2008); Burrows
et al. (2011)) and we use the maximum spot size Aeolus
retrieved to calculate the wind speed in the atmospheres
of Luhman 16A and B as: uwind ∼ ΩR/s2, where Ω is the
angular velocity, R = 1×RJup and s is the maximum spot
size. For Luhman 16A this implies a wind speed uwind ∼
602±49 or 891±58 m/s, depending on the assumed rota-
tion rate (8 hr or 5 hr, and assuming a δp ∼ 0.1 hr similar
to Luhman 16B), while for Luhman 16B this implies a
uwind ∼ 813±55 m/s (934±37 m/s) based on the H -- (J -- )
band map, and ∼ 968±94 m/s based on the G102 map.
These speeds are higher than the wind speeds of the giant
planets of our Solar system, but are lower, or compara-
ble to the wind speeds reported for highly irradiated hot
Jupiters by, e.g., Louden & Wheatley (2015); Col´on et al.
(2012) and Snellen et al. (2010). Previous calculations
of the wind speed on Luhman 16B by Burgasser et al.
(2014) predicted wind speeds between 1600 m/sec and
3400 m/sec, assuming a background TOA temperature
of 1510K and a spot -- temperature of 1700K<T<1900K.
These speeds are higher than the ones Aeolus retrieved.
However, since these speeds are upper limits our results
do not contradict, but rather further constrain the results
of Burgasser et al. (2014).
We performed a back -- of -- the -- envelope calculation of
the speed of sound, cs, on Luhman 16A and B. H2 is the
major constituent of both brown dwarfs' and Jupiter's
atmospheres. We took thus into account the variation of
the specific heat ratio of H2 between Jupiter's ∼165 K
and Luhman 16A and B ∼1300 K, as well as the variation
between these atmospheres' relative molecular mass. As-
suming that cs−Jupiter ∼1,000 m/sec at 1.5 bar (Lorenz
1998), we found that in Luhman 16A and B cs ∼2800
m/sec. This implies that the wind speeds we retrieved
using Aeolus and a Rhines -- length -- based argument are
subsonic, and thus plausible for Luhman 16A and B at-
Luhman 16B - J-band (2013)l=0°l=90°l=180°l=270°1600.1450.1300.1150.1000.Brightness Temperature (K)Tbg = 1280 K1256 K1318 K1421 K1229 KLatitude (deg)900-90Longitude (deg)060120180240300360Longitude (deg)036060120180240300Latitude (deg)0-9090Luhman 16B Crossfield et al. (2014)Brightness Temperature (K)10001600115013001450 mospheres.
Using the retrieved wind and sound speeds for the
atmospheres of Luhman 16A and B we calculated the
minimum timescales associated with wind -- and density --
wave -- driven changes in these atmospheres. Assuming
that Luhman 16A's and B's radii are equal to Jupiter's
radius and setting ts ∼ R/cs we find ts ∼6.94 hr, i.e.,
∼1.37 Luhman 16B rotations and ∼1.37 or ∼0.87 Luh-
man 16A rotations, depending on the assumed rota-
tional period (5 hr or 8 hr respectively). The advection
timescale tw ∼ R/uwind of Luhman 16A's atmosphere is
tw ∼ 32.26 hr (23.65 hr) or 4 (4.68) Luhman 16A rota-
tions, depending on the assumed rotational period. For
Luhman 16B tw ∼ 23.89 hr (20.79 hr, or 20.06 hr) or
4.7 (4.12, or 3.97) rotations based on the H -- band (J --
band, or G102 grism) map. If we define a timescale th as
the time required for a spot to be horizontally displaced
by a full spot -- sized length (∼ 40◦ or ∼ 0.7R) due to
the atmospheric wind, we get: th ∼ 22.6 hr (16.6 hr) or
2.8 (3.3) Luhman 16A rotations, and th ∼ 16.7 hr (14.6
hr, or 14 hr) or 3.3 (2.9, or 2.8) Luhman 16B rotations.
Space and ground -- based observations of Luhman 16B
show evolution of its light curve within a couple of rota-
tions, indicating that the TOA structure of Luhman 16B
changes in timescales of 1 -- 5 rotations (see, e.g., Buenzli
et al. (2015a,b); Mancini et al. (2015)). This is compara-
ble to the timescales we inferred here for density -- wave --
and horizontal wind -- driven changes in the atmosphere
of Luhman 16B.
7.2.2. Luhman 16B's evolving cloud structures.
Apai et al. (2013) and Buenzli et al. (2014, 2015a)
showed that the observed variability of light curves of
brown dwarfs in the L/T transition is not caused by
cloud clearings, but by variations in the optical thick-
ness of clouds across the TOA. A similar behavior is ob-
served for the giant, cloud covered, planets of our Solar
System. For example, Karalidi et al. (2015) showed that
the disk -- integrated light curves of Jupiter in the F275W
and F763M are comparable to observed light curves of
brown dwarfs, and are dominated by two distinct cloud
features: the Great Red Spot (a towering cloud structure
in the Jovian atmosphere) and a major 5 µm Hot Spot
(a region of thinner clouds that allows us to see deeper
cloud layers in the Jovian atmosphere). Recently, Simon
et al. (2015) acquired K2 observations of Neptune over
49 days and showed that the disk -- integrated light curve
of Neptune is dominated by a few distinct cloud features.
Using the K2 observations in combination with Hubble
Space Telescope and Keck imaging Simon et al. (2015)
proposed that a combination of stable, large -- scale cloud
features and smaller, short -- lived cloud features defines
the TOA structure and the observed light curve variabil-
ity. A similar combination could be responsible for the
observed variability in brown dwarf light curves. The
best -- fit maps of Aeolus for Luhman 16A and B have
spots that are hotter than the background TOA. This
could be, for example, the case when due to thinner
clouds we see deeper, hotter layers of the atmosphere.
These areas of thinner clouds could be caused by con-
vective downdrafts, in a similar way that Jupiter's 5 µm
Hot Spots are thought to be formed (see, Showman &
Ingersoll 1998; Showman & Dowling 2000).
Using the contribution function of a T2 dwarf for
9
Fig. 12. -- Relative flux contribution of every pressure level in the
best-fit model atmosphere of Buenzli et al. (2015a) as a function
of wavelength. The wavelength ranges observed in the two obser-
vational epochs used in this paper, as well as in Crossfield et al.
(2014) (C14), are shown with white arrows.
Luhman 16B we note that the J -- band and the G102
grism probe approximately the same pressure ranges (see
Fig. 12). When comparing the maps of the two epochs
one can thus deduce the evolution of the pressure layer
over the ∼1800 rotations between the two observations.
The maps show considerable difference between the two
epochs (see Fig. 7). However, we caution that the spots
of the second epoch are probably not the same as the
ones of the first epoch. Luhman 16B light curves ex-
hibit a significant evolution from one rotational period
to the next. Assume that the observed evolution over
the ∼9,000 hr (∼1800 rotations) between the two obser-
vational epochs is solely due to the longitudinal shift of
spots due to winds and possible appearance of new spots.
If we then assume a constant wind speed of uwind ∼934
m/s being responsible for the displacement of the spots
of epoch 1, in epoch 2 the spots would be displaced by
∼ 68◦ of longitude. This is a ∼38% to ∼75% larger dis-
placement than what we observe in our maps, implying
that more mechanisms are responsible for our light curve
evolution.
Space and ground -- based observations of Luhman 16B
show a rapid evolution of the observational light curves,
indicating a rapidly changing atmosphere. During the
∼1800 rotations that separate the two epochs of the ob-
servations used in this paper, Luhman 16B's TOA struc-
ture should have varied multiple times. Indeed, Mancini
et al. (2015) ground -- based observations of Luhman 16B
between 2014 April 19 and 2014 July 16 showed that
Luhman 16B's light curve evolved from one night to the
next (see their Fig. 6). Note that the Mancini et al.
(2015) observations were made in the i + z bands, which,
shortward of 0.8µm, probe higher altitudes of Luhamn
16B's atmosphere than the G102 band.
It is interesting to estimate the TOA map of Luhman
16B between the two observational epochs of this paper
using the Mancini et al. (2015) light curves (their Fig.
6, hereafter MLC). We were not interested in an accu-
rate mapping, but rather a sketch of the TOA struc-
ture. Thus, we did not apply Aeolus on the MLC but
instead we performed a visual comparison of the MLC
with light curves Aeolus produced, assuming that all
(possible) spots are hotter than the background TOA
0.8.1.21.62.02.4 7.0 5.6 4.2 2.8 1.4 0.00.8.1.21.62.02.4Wavelength (m) 7.0 5.6 4.2 2.8 1.4 0.0Pressure (bar)T= 1300 K, log(g)=4.5, fsed=30.8.1.21.62.02.4 7.0 5.6 4.2 2.8 1.4 0.0 2.18 2.18 2.18 2.18 2.18 2.18 2.18 10.91 17.46 0.003.276.559.8213.0916.3719.64G102 grism/Epoch 2μRelative flux contribution (%)J - band/ Epoch 1H - band / Epoch 1C14 10
by ∼ 200 K (see Fig. 7). The best -- fit maps included
three -- or -- more spots, whose location on the TOA varied
from one light curve (night) to the next. For example a
visual comparison of Aeolus light curves with the "MDJ-
56770" light curve gives a best-fit for three spots, for
the "MDJ-56775" light curve for four spots, and for the
"MDJ-56778" light curve for three spots. Given that the
MLC were separated by as little as ∼5 rotations from
each other, the variability of our best -- fit maps indicates
a highly variable atmosphere. In the future, the acqui-
sition of continuous, multi -- rotation observations of Luh-
man 16B will be of great interest. Applying Aeolus on
the light curves of such observations, we will be able to
continuously map the variability of Luhman 16B's TOA
and provide feedback to General Circulation and Radia-
tive Transfer models to help understand the mechanisms
that rule the observed variability.
7.2.3. The Possible Persistent Cloud Structure PPCS-1
An inspection of the J -- (or H -- ) band light curve of
epoch 1 and the G102 grism light curve of epoch 2 showed
the existence of a similar trough around a rotational
phase of 0.6. The shape of these troughs was similar
even though the two observational epochs were separated
by ∼ 1800 rotations (see Fig. 1). The similarity of the
troughs in these light curves hints to the existence of a
similar feature in the TOA of Luhman 16B in the two
epochs. We hereafter refer to this feature as: Possible
Persistent Cloud Structure PPCS-1. We observed a sim-
ilar trough in some of the light curves of Gillon et al.
(2013) (observed in the I + z TRAPPIST filter), while
none of the Mancini et al. (2015) light curves (observed
in the i + z Danish 1.54m long -- pass filter) contained a
trough that matched the PPCS-1.
Fig. 13 shows the PPCS-1 in the two epochs of HST
light curves used in this paper, and the matching PPCS-
1 of Gillon et al. (2013) light curves. Note that the phase
(time/period) of the light curves is altered in comparison
to Fig. 1, and that we shifted the light curves so that the
troughs of PPCS-1 match. The Gillon et al. (2013) ob-
servations took place ∼ 2800 rotations before the epoch
1, and ∼ 4600 rotations before the epoch 2 observations
used in this paper. The existence of PPCS-1 in these five
light curves separated by tens of hundreds of rotations
is intriguing. Note that the Gillon et al. (2013) observa-
tions used the I + z filter of the TRAPPIST telescope,
and probe higher (similar) altitude levels in the atmo-
sphere of Luhman 16B than our G102 grism light curve
shortwards (longwards) of ∼ 0.8µm.
We performed a back -- of -- the -- envelope calculation of
the orbital period of an exoplanet responsible for PPCS-
1. Taking into account the observed J -- band "transit"
depth and duration, and assuming a circular orbit with
an impact parameter b = 0 (the planet transits through
the center of the Luhman 16B's disk), we calculated an
orbital period of ∼ 101 hr [a more accurate fit of the
PPCS-1 to possible exoplanet orbits gave a best-fit for
periods of (cid:38) 500 days (Ben W. P. Lew, private communi-
cation)]. We thus ruled out the possibility that PPCS-1
was due to an exoplanet, since the PPCS-1 was visible
in two successive Luhman 16B rotations in the Gillon
et al. (2013) light curves (see the "Gillon+14, 376.6" and
"Gillon+14, 376.68" PPCS-1 in Fig. 13).
Assuming the PPCS-1 is due to a TOA feature this
Fig. 13. -- Luhman 16B light curves observed hundreds of ro-
tations from each other exhibit a similar trough, indicating the
existence of a similar feature in the TOA of Luhman 16B (PPCS-
1). Note that we shifted the light curves so that the trough of
PPCS-1 match.
could indicate either the existence of a stable formation
(like the Great Red Spot of Jupiter) that periodically
reappears at the TOA, or similar formations that appear
and disappear at different times. In the case of a stable
formation variations in other, unrelated cloud structures
could occasionally wash out the modulations, thus ex-
plaining why the PPCS-1 is only detected in some, but
not other, light curves. In the case of similar formations
appearing at different observation times this could im-
ply a possible preferred size for cloud structures in the
TOA of Luhman 16B. Longer, multi-wavelength obser-
vations of Luhman 16B over (partially) continuous rota-
tions could help clarify the nature of this feature.
8. CONCLUSIONS
We presented the first map of Luhman 16A and maps
of two epochs of Luhman 16B. Aeolus constrained the
inclination of Luhman 16A to 18◦ ± 8◦ or 56◦ ± 5◦, de-
pending on the assumed rotational period, and 26◦ ± 8◦
for Luhman 16B.
In agreement with the complexity of the observa-
tional light curves Aeolus retrieved complex top -- of -- the --
atmosphere cloud structures for both Luhman 16A and
16B, with a surface spot coverage of 19% to 32% (de-
pending on the assumed rotational period), and ∼21%
(2013) to ∼39% (2014) respectively.
We compared our Luhman 16B maps with the only pre-
viously published map of Crossfield et al. (2014). Using
the principal component analysis results of Buenzli et al.
(2015a,b) Aeolus retrieved hotter than the background
TOA spots for both observational epochs, unlike the hot-
ter and cooler than the background TOA spots mixture
that Crossfield et al. (2014) map showed. Relaxing the
PCA induced constraints Aeolus fit a mixture of hotter
and cooler (than the background TOA) spots, in agree-
ment with the Crossfield et al. (2014) map. Interestingly,
the largest spot Aeolus retrieved was the coolest spot and
lay at low latitudes, in agreement with the Crossfield
et al. (2014) map, even though the latter probed higher
altitudes in the atmosphere of Luhman 16B. However,
the BIC of the mixed -- spot solution was larger than that
of hotter -- only spot solution, making the latter the pre-
ferred Aeolus map.
0.00.10.20.30.40.5Time/Period0.940.960.981.001.021.041.06Normalized flux (TRAPPIST)Gillon+14, 368Gillon+14, 376.6Gillon+14, 376.8J-band, epoch 1J-band, epoch 1G102, epoch 2G102, epoch 20.920.961.001.04NormalizedFlux(HST)PPCS-1 Finally, we reported the detection of a feature (PPCS-
1) that reappeared in light curves of Luhman 16B that
are separated by tens of hundreds of rotations from each
other. We excluded the possibility that this feature is
due to an exoplanet and speculated that it is related to
TOA structures of Luhman 16B.
This work is part of the Spitzer Cycle-9 Exploration
Program Extrasolar Storms (program No. 90063). Sup-
port for this work was provided by NASA through an
award issued by JPL/Caltech. Support for Program
number 12314 was provided by NASA through a grant
from the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is op-
erated by the Association of Universities for Research in
Astronomy, Incorporated, under NASA contract NAS5-
11
26555. An allocation of computer time from the UA Re-
search Computing High Performance Computing (HTC)
and High Throughput Computing (HTC) at the Univer-
sity of Arizona is gratefully acknowledged. This study,
in part, is based on observations made with the NASA/
ESA Hubble Space Telescope, obtained at the Space
Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the As-
sociation of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc.,
under NASA contract NAS 526555. D. Apai acknowl-
edges support by the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration under Agreement No. NNX15AD94G
for the program Earths in Other Solar Systems. We
thank I.J.M. Crossfield for providing us with the pre-
viously published Luhman 16B map dataset. We thank
Ben W. P. Lew for providing us with a best-fit exoplanet
period for the PPCS-1 in Luhman 16B light curves. We
thank the anonymous referee for a helpful report.
REFERENCES
Apai, D., Radigan, J., Buenzli, E., Burrows, A., Reid, I. N., &
Jayawardhana, R. 2013, ApJ, 768, 121
Biller, B. A., Crossfield, I. J. M., Mancini, L., Ciceri, S.,
Southworth, J., Kopytova, T. G., Bonnefoy, M., Deacon, N. R.,
Schlieder, J. E., Buenzli, E., Brandner, W., Allard, F.,
Homeier, D., Freytag, B., Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Greiner, J.,
Henning, T., & Goldman, B. 2013, ApJ, 778, L10
Boffin, H. M. J., Pourbaix, D., Muzi´c, K., Ivanov, V. D., Kurtev,
R., Beletsky, Y., Mehner, A., Berger, J. P., Girard, J. H., &
Mawet, D. 2014, A&A, 561, L4
Buenzli, E., Marley, M. S., Apai, D., & Lupu, R. E. 2014,
Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana, 85, 690
Buenzli, E., Marley, M. S., Apai, D., Saumon, D., Biller, B. A.,
Crossfield, I. J. M., & Radigan, J. 2015a, ApJ, 812, 163
Buenzli, E., Saumon, D., Marley, M. S., Apai, D., Radigan, J.,
Bedin, L. R., Reid, I. N., & Morley, C. V. 2015b, ApJ, 798, 127
Burgasser, A. J., Gillon, M., Faherty, J. K., Radigan, J., Triaud,
A. H. M. J., Plavchan, P., Street, R., Jehin, E., Delrez, L., &
Opitom, C. 2014, ApJ, 785, 48
Burgasser, A. J., Sheppard, S. S., & Luhman, K. L. 2013, ApJ,
772, 129
Burrows, A., Heng, K., & Nampaisarn, T. 2011, ApJ, 736, 47
Col´on, K. D., Ford, E. B., Redfield, S., Fortney, J. J., Shabram,
M., Deeg, H. J., & Mahadevan, S. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 2233
Crossfield, I. J. M., Biller, B., Schlieder, J. E., Deacon, N. R.,
Bonnefoy, M., Homeier, D., Allard, F., Buenzli, E., Henning,
T., Brandner, W., Goldman, B., & Kopytova, T. 2014, Nature,
505, 654
Faherty, J. K., Beletsky, Y., Burgasser, A. J., Tinney, C., Osip,
D. J., Filippazzo, J. C., & Simcoe, R. A. 2014, ApJ, 790, 90
Gelman, A. & Rubin, D. B. 1992, Stat. Sci., 7, 457
Gillon, M., Triaud, A. H. M. J., Jehin, E., Delrez, L., Opitom, C.,
Magain, P., Lendl, M., & Queloz, D. 2013, A&A, 555, L5
Karalidi, T., Apai, D., Schneider, G., Hanson, J. R., & Pasachoff,
J. M. 2015, ApJ, 814, 65
Kniazev, A. Y., Vaisanen, P., Muzi´c, K., Mehner, A., Boffin,
H. M. J., Kurtev, R., Melo, C., Ivanov, V. D., Girard, J.,
Mawet, D., Schmidtobreick, L., Huelamo, N., Borissova, J.,
Minniti, D., Ishibashi, K., Potter, S. B., Beletsky, Y., Buckley,
D. A. H., Crawford, S., Gulbis, A. A. S., Kotze, P., Miszalski,
B., Pickering, T. E., Romero Colmenero, E., & Williams, T. B.
2013, ApJ, 770, 124
Lorenz, R. D. 1998, Planet. Space Sci., 47, 67
Louden, T. & Wheatley, P. J. 2015, ArXiv e-prints
Luhman, K. L. 2013, ApJ, 767, L1
Mancini, L., Giacobbe, P., Littlefair, S. P., Southworth, J., Bozza,
V., Damasso, M., Dominik, M., Hundertmark, M., Jørgensen,
U. G., Juncher, D., Popovas, A., Rabus, M., Rahvar, S.,
Schmidt, R. W., Skottfelt, J., Snodgrass, C., Sozzetti, A.,
Alsubai, K., Bramich, D. M., Calchi Novati, S., Ciceri, S.,
D'Ago, G., Figuera Jaimes, R., Galianni, P., Gu, S.-H.,
Harpsøe, K., Haugbølle, T., Henning, T., Hinse, T. C., Kains,
N., Korhonen, H., Scarpetta, G., Starkey, D., Surdej, J., Wang,
X.-B., & Wertz, O. 2015, A&A, 584, A104
Metchev, S. A., Heinze, A., Apai, D., Flateau, D., Radigan, J.,
Burgasser, A., Marley, M. S., Artigau, ´E., Plavchan, P., &
Goldman, B. 2015, ApJ, 799, 154
Radigan, J. 2014, ArXiv e-prints
Radigan, J., Lafreni`ere, D., Jayawardhana, R., & Artigau, E.
2014, ArXiv e-prints
Sahlmann, J. & Lazorenko, P. F. 2015, MNRAS, 453, L103
Saumon, D., & Marley, M. S. 2008, ApJ, 689, 1327
Schwarz, G. 1978, Annals of Statistics, 6, 461
Showman, A. P. & Dowling, T. E. 2000, Science, 289, 1737
Showman, A. P. & Ingersoll, A. P. 1998, Icarus, 132, 205
Simon, A. A., Rowe, J. F., Gaulme, P., Hammel, H. B., Casewell,
S. L., Fortney, J. J., Gizis, J. E., Lissauer, J. J.,
Morales-Juberias, R., Orton, G. S., Wong, M. H., & Marley,
M. S. 2015, ArXiv e-prints
Snellen, I. A. G., de Kok, R. J., de Mooij, E. J. W., & Albrecht,
S. 2010, Nature, 465, 1049
Unruh, Y. C. & Collier Cameron, A. 1995, MNRAS, 273, 1
Vogt, S. S., Penrod, G. D., & Hatzes, A. P. 1987, ApJ, 321, 496
|
1904.07769 | 1 | 1904 | 2019-03-28T14:51:05 | A possible YORP effect on C and S Main Belt Asteroids | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | A rotating frequency analysis in a previous paper, showed that two samples of C and S-type asteroids belonging to the Main Belt, but not to any families, present two different values for the transition diameter to a Maxwellian distribution of the rotation frequency, respectively 48 and 33 km. In this paper, after a more detailed statistical analysis, aiming to verify that the result is physically relevant, we found a better estimate for the transition diameter, respectively $D_C = 44 \pm 2$ km and $D_S = 30 \pm 1$ km. The ratio between these estimated transition diameters, $D_C/D_S = 1.5 \pm 0.1$, can be supported with the help of the YORP (Yarkovsky-O'Keefe-Radzievskii-Paddack) effect, although other physical causes can not be completely ruled out. In this paper we have derived a simple scaling law for YORP which, taking into account the different average heliocentric distance, the bulk density, the albedo and the asteroid <<asymmetry surface factor>>, has enabled us to reasonably justify the ratio between the diameters transition of C-type and S-type asteroids. The same scaling law can be used to estimate a new ratio between the bulk densities of S and C asteroids samples (giving $\rho_S/\rho_C \approx 2.9 \pm 0.3$), and can explain why the asteroids near the transition diameter have about the same absolute magnitude. For C-type asteroids, using the found density ratio and other estimates of S-type density, it is also possible to estimate an average bulk density equal to $0.9 \pm 0.1$ g cm-3, a value compatible with icy composition. The suggested explanation for the difference of the transition diameters is a plausible hypothesis, consistent with the data, but it needs to be studied more in depth with further observations. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | A possible YORP effect on C and S Main Belt Asteroids
A. Carbognani
Astronomical Observatory of the Autonomous Region of the Aosta Valley (OAVdA)
Saint-Barthélemy Loc. Lignan, 39
11020 Nus, Aosta -- Italy
1
Number of manuscript pages: 29
Number of figures: 6
Number of tables: 3
Proposed running head: A possible YORP effect on C and S asteroids
Editorial correspondence to:
Dr Albino Carbognani
Astronomical Observatory of the Autonomous Region of the Aosta Valley (OAVdA)
Fondazione Clément Fillietroz-ONLUS
Saint-Barthélemy Loc. Lignan, 39
11020 Nus, Aosta -- Italy
Telephone: +39 0165 77 00 50
Fax: +39 0165 77 00 51
E-mail address: [email protected]
2
Abstract
A rotating frequency analysis in a previous paper, showed that two samples of C and S-type
asteroids belonging to the Main Belt, but not to any families, present two different values for the
transition diameter to a Maxwellian distribution of the rotation frequency, respectively 48 and 33
km. In this paper, after a more detailed statistical analysis, aiming to verify that the result is
physically relevant, we found a better estimate for the transition diameter, respectively DC = 44 --
km and DS = 30 --
can be supported with the help of the YORP (Yarkovsky-O'Keefe-Radzievskii-Paddack) effect,
1 km. The ratio between these estimated transition diameters, DC/DS = 1.5 --
0.1,
2
although other physical causes can not be completely ruled out.
In this paper we have derived a simple scaling law for YORP which, taking into account the
different average heliocentric distance, the bulk density, the albedo and the asteroid "asymmetry
surface factor", has enabled us to reasonably justify the ratio between the diameters transition of C-
type and S-type asteroids. The same scaling law can be used to estimate a new ratio between the
bulk densities of S and C asteroids samples (giving r S/r C »
asteroids near the transition diameter have about the same absolute magnitude. For C-type asteroids,
0.3), and can explain why the
2.9 --
using the found density ratio and other estimates of S-type density, it is also possible to estimate an
average bulk density equal to 0.9 --
0.1 g cm-3, a value compatible with icy composition. The
suggested explanation for the difference of the transition diameters is a plausible hypothesis,
consistent with the data, but it needs to be studied more in depth with further observations.
Key words: Asteroids, rotation; Rotational dynamics
3
1 Introduction
In a previous paper (Carbognani, 2010), hereafter paper I, we have compared the observable
properties of 962 numbered MBAs (Main Belt Asteroids) of Tholen/SMASSII C and S class (495 S
and 467 C), with a diameter range 1-500 km, not belonging to families or binary systems. The data
for the MBAs sample were drawn from Asteroid LightCurve Data Base (or ALCDB, version of
2009 April 21), care of Alan W. Harris and Brian D. Warner of Space Science Institute and Petr
Pravec of the Astronomical Institute, Czech Republic (Warner et al., 2009).
One of the minor results of the paper quoted above is that, between 48 and 200 km, the C asteroids
have a rotation frequency distribution compatible with a Maxwellian whereas, for S asteroids the
compatibility with the Maxwellian involves diameters greater than 33 km. The transition diameter
from non-Maxwellian to Maxwellian appears sharp and one of the questions we want to answer
here, is if the diameter transition ratio, i.e. DC/DS, is relevant from a physical point of view.
Before answering this and other questions, we will review the known physical characteristics
considered here for the two asteroids populations: geometric albedo, mean semimajor axis and bulk
density.
The C and S class asteroids can effortlessly be distinguished in a (B-V)-(U-B) diagram, and appear
approximation). The asteroids of Tholen S class have an average geometrical albedo
as two homogeneous body populations with different surface physical properties (at least in first
vp = 0.20 --
0.02 for the same quantity (Shevchenko and Lupishko,
0.07, while the C class have
vp = 0.06 --
1998). These values are practically independent of the diameter.
The majority of MBAs have semimajor axes within the range 2.2-3.2 AU, but the S-type asteroids
are located nearer the inner edge of the Main Belt, while the C-type are nearer the outer edge. The
dichotomy in the mean distance from the Sun is visible in the two analysed samples. For the S
asteroids of our sample the mean heliocentric distance is 2.538 --
objects), while for C the mean heliocentric distance is 3.013 --
asteroids). The semimajor axis data for the MBAs samples are drawn from the JPL Small-Body
0.014 AU (mean value of 467
0.011 AU (mean value of 495
Database Browser (JPLSBDB), available from http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi. The distributions are
shown in Fig. 1.
The asteroid's bulk density is a more difficult parameter to obtain, as we need to know both the
body mass and the volume. Data on the bulk density of asteroids have increased in the last years
and have led to significant insights into the structure of these objects. The advancement of
knowledge comes mainly from observations of asteroid satellites, asteroid mutual gravitational
events, perturbations on neighbouring spacecraft and dynamical models of perturbing acceleration
on Mars. In general, most asteroids have relatively low mean densities and probably have
4
significant porosity (Britt et al., 2002). Furthermore there are clues suggesting a density variation
within taxonomic classes due to porosity variations (Baer and Chesley, 2008). In our case, we
assume that the bulk density is diameter independent. Dynamical estimates of the bulk density of
the 300/351 largest asteroids of the Main Belt, plus a massive asteroid ring to take into account the
collective gravitational effect of small asteroids, leads to the values shown in Table 1 (Krasinsky et
al., 2002). The density estimate shown in the table was made as follows.
A first estimate of the mass of the largest asteroid is made using an estimate of the diameter and the
bulk density value for the taxonomic class. Accumulating the planetary perturbations exerted by
each class, it is possible to correct the value initially assumed for bulk density, and determine the
best average value representative of the whole taxonomic class. As we can see, the values of the
density ratio from Table 1 are not consistent with each other and this gives a glimpse of the
difficulty to accurately estimate asteroids' bulk density. In the following paragraph we will give a
quick guide to the paper.
After a review of the method used to calculate the transition diameter and a control of the asteroids
database, we have shown that the ratio between the transition diameters is relevant from a physical
point of view and that this may be due to YORP (Yarkovsky-O'Keefe-Radzievskii-Paddack) effect
on the two different asteroids samples although, at this stage, other physical causes can not be
completely ruled out.
To this purpose, we have developed a simple physical model, YORP based, which gives the ratio
between the transition diameters as a function of asteroids bulk density, mean heliocentric distance
and a quantity that we call "asymmetry surface factor" (see below).
As a first raw test for the physical model proposed here, i.e. to see if the theoretical ratio between
the transition diameters is near, or at least not too far, with the one observed, we need to know a
mean ratio between the bulk density of S and C asteroids, so we use the mean value obtained from
Table 1, about 2.0 --
ratio, we will see the physical consequences of this model, and provide a new estimate of the bulk
0.4. After this plausibility test, and using only the observed transition diameters
density ratio between the S and C asteroids samples. For C-type asteroids, using the found density
ratio and a mean of the S-type density from Table 1, it is also possible to estimate an average bulk
density equal to 0.9 --
0.1 g cm-3. This value appears to be interesting because it suggests the
existence of a high percentage of icy asteroids within the C-type. Finally, we have proved that our
model can justify the fact that the absolute magnitude of the asteroids near the transition diameter is
approximately the same.
5
2 A closer estimate of the transition diameters to the Maxwellian distribution
As in Warner et al. (2009), "It is important to remember that the data in ALCDB are not the result
of a single, well-controlled survey, but are, instead, the compilation of a number of observing
programs, each with its own goals and observing parameters". The current lightcurves numbers in
ALCDB are over 3700, with about 3100 asteroids that have reasonably determined rotation periods
as of December 2008. For MBAs there is a bias against asteroids in the diameter range 3.5-14 km,
because they are too faint to be easily worked upon with small instruments (Warner et al., 2009). In
paper I, we have found that "for diameter values equal to or greater than about 20 km, the diameter
distribution of C and S asteroids [in ALCDB] is about the same because the mean values and
standard deviations are similar. Also, the ratio between C and S numbers is almost constant, with
values between 3 and 2.7. On the contrary, below 20 km the average diameter of S is much smaller
than that of C and the ratio C/S drops to near 1. This difference can be attributed to an observational
bias in favour of the small S asteroids". So, the bias on C and S asteroids periods starts around 15-
20 km in diameter (with absolute magnitude in the range 12-11), well below the transition diameters
that we want to analyse. Regarding the taxonomy in ALCDB, when available, taxonomic classes
are taken from the Asteroids II database, SMASS II (Small Main-Belt Asteroid Spectroscopic
Survey), and from SDSS (Sloan Digital Sky Survey) colors (Warner et al., 2009). As discussed
below, we checked the taxonomic classification for asteroids around the transition diameter and
removed the uncertain cases (see Table 2).
Now, we are going to briefly review the method used in paper I (refer to it for more details), for the
derivation of the transition diameters to the Maxwellian distribution. The analysed diameters, range
from 4 km (lower limit) to 200 km (upper limit) and we use Kuiper test (Press et al., 1992), to
evaluate the compatibility with a Maxwellian distribution. We gradually increase the inferior
diameter value (keeping constant the superior diameter value), by 1 km steps, and, for every step,
we execut Kuiper test for the Maxwellian distribution. The compatibility test is considered
successful if the confidence level of rejection is equal to or less than 95%. In our case, as already
mentioned, the feedback was negative until we reached 33 km for S-type and 48 km for C-type
asteroids.
For a direct comparison between the rotation frequency distribution and the three-dimensional
theoretical Maxwellian distribution, see Fig. 2, 3, 4 and 5. In these figures, the rotation frequency is
indicated by the W
symbol and is equal to 24/P (where P is the asteroid rotation period in hours),
and it is measured in rotations per day (or cyc day-1). As we can see, both for the S and C-type
asteroids, the rotation frequencies distribution is in fairly good agreement with the Maxwellian
distribution (as confirmed by Kuiper test), only in case the diameter value exceeds a certain
6
threshold. If we go below this threshold, an excess of slow rotators appears, as well as a lack of
medium rotators and an excess of fast rotators, which is due to smaller asteroids. In these figures we
did not go below 15 km in diameter due to the observational bias.
After that, in order to test any physical relevance of the results found in paper I, we have analysed
in depth the accuracy of asteroid periods and diameters around the Maxwellian transition diameter
so, for S-type, the examined asteroids have diameters in the range 20-50 km (92 objects), while for
C-type the range is 30-60 km (183 objects). To select the asteroids whose rotation frequency
deviates too much from the Maxwellian distribution we have used the c 2 test with a bin of 0.5 d-1.
We have decided to review the asteroids data for which:
EO
E
1‡
(1)
In Equation (1), O is the observed asteroid number in the bin, while E is the expected asteroid
number in accordance with the Maxwellian distribution. From Eq. 1, we have checked the data of
69 S-type asteroids and 150 C-type asteroids with the new version files of ALCDB (up-to-date,
November 18, 2009). For a cross comparison we have used the taxonomic and albedo data
contained in JPLSBDB. As far as the C and S diameters and the rotation periods values are
concerned, there are no changes in the new ALCDB with respect to the values previously used in
paper I. For most asteroids (about 60%), the lightcurve quality code is U=3, whereas for the
remaining objects it is U=2. The value U=3, denotes a certain result with no ambiguity and full
lightcurve coverage while, if U=2, the period is based on less than full coverage, so it might be
wrong by 20 percent or more, but still useful for statistical study. For more details on the
assignment of the U code see Warner et al., (2009) or the "README.txt" file that accompanies the
ALCDB.
Regarding taxonomy, most S-type asteroids were classified according to the spectrum or the color
indices. Twelve asteroids are classifiable S-type according to the IRAS (Infra Red Astronomical
Satellite) geometric albedo (pv = 0.11-0.32); four asteroids have a low IRAS geometric albedo and
appear more C-type asteroids (pv = 0.047-0.056). For these asteroids there are no other useful data.
Finally, asteroid (723) is classified as C-type from JPLSBDB (high resolution spectrum), while
asteroid (1407) is classified as X-type (same source and motivation). Thus, in first approximation,
for S-type we can discard six asteroids, about 9% of the total (see Table 2 for the full list).
Regarding the C-type asteroids, only 25 were classified by means of spectrum or colour indices.
About half are classifiable as C-type owing to the IRAS geometric albedo (pv = 0.021-0.092); four
7
-
asteroids are classified X-type from JPLSBDB (high resolution spectrum); eleven asteroids have a
high IRAS geometric albedo (pv = 0.12-0.27), which makes it unlikely that they belong to C-type.
Finally, for twenty-seven asteroids, there are no useful data for taxonomic classification of any
kind. So, concerning C-type asteroids, and always as a first approximation, there are 42 objects to
be discarded, about 28% of the total (see Table 2 for the list). In general, after this brief analysis,
one can see that S-type asteroids are best observed from the physical point of view.
However, after this check and screening of the asteroids database around the raw transition
diameters found in paper I, there is an additional problem one has to deal with an additional issue:
asteroids' diameters are not exactly known.
In ALCDB the diameters are taken, when available, from the Supplemental IRAS Minor Planet
Survey (Tedesco et al., 2002), in short SIMPS. If this value is not available, the diameter is
estimated by Eq. (14), with the H value taken from MPCORB catalogue (Minor Planet Center,
2010) and with an assumed value for the geometrical albedo. So, asteroids' diameter values in
ALCDB could be incorrect by --
and S examined in paper I, the fractions of asteroids with diameters from SIMPS vs. diameter lower
20% or more (Warner et al., 2009). As for our full samples of C
limit are shown in Table 3. As we can see, for asteroids greater than 10 km, most of the diameter
values come from SIMPS. For our subsample of S-type asteroids near transition diameter, 94% of
the diameter values are from SIMPS, while for C-type asteroids the percentage drops to 73%. In
practice, most of our asteroid diameters come from IRAS catalogue.
For asteroids with 100 km < D < 350 km for which there exist high-quality results from stellar
occultations, the mean difference in the diameters derived from IRAS is --
2002), that which rises to --
diameters uncertainty for our asteroids sample, we can assume a random value of ± 20%, without
35% for small asteroids (Krasinsky et al., 2002). So, regarding mean
7% (Tedesco et al.,
appreciable systematic errors.
A similar argument applies to the rotation frequencies with quality code U = 2. In the S asteroids
sample with diameter D ‡
the percentage rises to 46%.
20 km, these objects amount to 32% of the total while, for C asteroids,
Now, the problem is to estimate the mean uncertainty for the periods with lightcurve quality U = 2.
To this purpose, we compared the rotation periods of forty asteroids, both C and S, with quality U =
3 and belonging to our sample, with the corresponding period values included in ALCDB of 2006
March 14, when their lightcurve quality was U = 2. The mean relative period uncertainty is 10% --
3% so, to be sure not to underestimate uncertainties, a mean representative value of ± 20% was
taken also for periods, as for diameters.
8
We do not know the real diameters of asteroids or their rotation frequencies (for the cases U = 2),
but now we can estimate the sensitivity and the uncertainty of the transition diameters by adding a
gaussian random noise of --
C asteroids samples, and then the Kuiper test is repeated in the same way as in paper I. As in
20% on the known diameters and rotation frequencies of the full S and
previous work (paper I), the tests were done normalizing every rotation frequency of the samples to
the mean rotation frequency, in order to eliminate the dishomogeneity due to different asteroid sizes
(Pravec and Harris, 2000), but there are not significant differences between the results with and
without normalization. All this is done for n times (with n sufficiently large, see Appendix). At the
computation end, with a set of independent transition diameter values, we can estimate the mean
value and the standard deviation.
Applying the method outlined above, the transition diameters appear to be: DC = 44 --
= 30 --
paper I (so Fig. 2, 3, 4 and 5 do not change substantially). The transition diameter appears to be not
1 km (see Appendix). These values are in agreement with the first row estimate obtained in
2 km and DS
dramatically sensitive to asteroids diameters and rotation frequencies uncertainties. However,
uncertainties on the rotation frequencies have a much greater importance than the ones on the
diameters. The transition diameter difference is DC - DS = 14 --
significant result. So, our best estimate for the transition diameters ratio is DC/DS »
It is interesting to note that rotational analysis carried out considering all asteroid types, indicate the
3 km, and can be considered a
1.5 --
0.1.
30-40 km range below which we have large deviations from the Maxwellian distribution, due to the
occurrence of several relatively rapidly rotating asteroids and one very slow rotator (Pravec et al.,
2002). This transition range appears compatible with our previous values, obtained by analyzing
separately the C and S asteroid types.
As stated in Farinella et al. (1981), a difference in the spin rate distribution of two asteroid samples
of different taxonomic types can be due to "dynamical" or "chemical-physical" reasons. In the
former category we can have different mean sizes of the parent bodies or different mean relative
velocities, while in the latter we have difference in structure or composition, resulting in different
behaviour during collisional events. But there may be a third category, involving environmental
factors external to the asteroid belt, such as solar radiation.
As mentioned above, the distributions of the rotation frequencies in Fig. 2 and 4, in comparison
with Fig. 3 and 5, show an excess of fast and slow rotators of little diameter, while the central part
of the distribution appears empty, as if an external factor had "smeared" the rotation frequency with
respect to Maxwellian distribution. This appears to be independent of taxonomic type and is in
agreement with the YORP effect behavior because, if we reduce the asteroid's size, we expect a
9
major alteration of the rotation, due to the thermal emission, toward shorter and long periods
(Pravec et al., 2008).
Now we shall try to explain the Dc/Ds value (and more), with the help of this physical effect, but it
is important to recall that deviations of asteroid spin rates from the Maxwellian distribution can
occur not only when the asteroid population is not collisionally relaxed, but also when the asteroid
sample is dishomogeneous (Pravec et al., 2002).
Despite every possible effort to have homogeneous asteroids samples, it may not be so. Therefore,
what follows should be considered with caution, as we can not rule out other physical causes for the
deviations from Maxwellian distribution. We assume here that YORP is the only, or the main,
process affecting asteroids' spin.
3 A scaling law for the YORP effect
The YORP effect is a non-gravitational force due to the thermal photon emission from the asteroid
surface, and can change the spin of the body if it has the right shape. An asteroid to be spun up must
have a certain amount of asymmetry in its shape; figures of revolution as the sphere, or even the
triaxial ellipsoid, will not be affected by the YORP effect (Rubincam, 2000). Unlike the photons
emitted, the momentum deposited on the surface by arriving solar photons cancel identically when
averaged around an orbit, while the recoil imparted to the surface by departing reflected photons is
proportional to Bond albedo, and is irrelevant for a dark surface like that of the asteroids, which
reflects sunlight very little (Statler, 2009).
The YORP effect can have a significant effect on the spin even for relatively large asteroids. With a
simple scaling of the Rubincam's work, (2000), we can compare YORP vs collision timescale, for
C and S asteroids near the transition diameter found above. For C-type asteroids (pseudo-Deimos
model), near 3 AU, with a diameter of 44 km and a bulk density of 1.3 g cm-3 the time to double the
rotation speed is TYORP »
1.4 ·109 years, whereas typically the time to substantially change the
rotation period of a Main Belt asteroid is TColl »
5·108 years (Farinella et al., 1998). So, the YORP
timescale is longer than the collision timescale but an alteration in the rotation period for C-type
asteroids appears still possible. For S-type asteroids (pseudo-Ida model), near 2.86 AU from the
Sun, with a diameter of 30 km ad a bulk density of 2.6 g cm-3 we have TYORP »
1.9 ·108 years, while
TColl »
4.1 ·108 years so in this case the timescales are fully comparable. Thus the YORP effect,
despite collisions, appears physically significant for MBAs spin rates evolution up to bodies of
about 40 km in diameter with average density of 2-3 g cm-3 (Binzel, 2003).
Moreover, the YORP effect is extremely sensitive to surface details, like surface roughness,
boulders and craters. A single large feature can alter YORP by tens percent or more (Statler, 2009).
10
Given that the topographical features of asteroids are known in detail only in few cases, it is
extremely difficult to predict the spin rate evolution on individual cases or on a population of
homogeneous bodies (Statler, 2009). From this point of view a more statistical approach can be
useful to estimate to which size the YORP effect has significantly altered the asteroids' rotation.
Now we derive a simple analytical scaling law for YORP effect, capable to compare the non-
gravitational effects for two populations of bodies, not belonging to families, with different mean
physical properties.
The infinitesimal force for YORP on a dS element of the asteroid surface at temperature T, is given
by (Spitale and Greenberg, 2001; Bottke et al., 2002; Bottke et al., 2006):
r
Fd
-=
2 se
t
3
c
r
SdT
4
(2)
r
In Equation (2), the Lambert emission model is assumed. The infinitesimal vector Sd
to the surface, et is the emissivity, s
The emissivity is dimensionless, being the ratio between the energy radiated by the material and the
the Stefan-Boltzmann constant and c the light speed in vacuum.
is orthogonal
energy which would be radiated by a blackbody of equal effective temperature. So for a blackbody
et = 1, while for a real body et < 1. Introducing the asteroid Bond albedo A (or spherical albedo,
defined as the ratio between the reflected flux and the incident flux), and the solar constant FS on
asteroid surface, using energy conservation we can write (in the limit of zero thermal conductivity):
se
t
4
T
=
F
S
(
1
)
(
cos
A
z
S
)
=
F
E
2
(
1
a
E
R
)
(
cos
A
z
S
)
(3)
In Equation (3), zS is the zenith distance of the Sun, R is the asteroid heliocentric distance, FE =
1378 W m-2 is the solar constant at Earth distance, and aE = 1 AU is the mean distance Earth-Sun.
Taking this into account, Eq. (2) can be rewritten as:
r
Fd
-=
2
3
F
E
c
a
E
R
2
(
1
)
(
cos
A
r
) Sdz
S
(4)
r
The torque due to the infinitesimal YORP effect on a surface dS at a r
distance from the asteroid
centre of mass is
r
r
r
·=t
d
Fdr
. The total momentum is given by integrating over the whole asteroid
11
-
-
-
r
surface. If the asteroid is perfectly spherical, the vectors r
and Sd are always parallel, so the
torque is zero and total YORP effect is zero (Rubincam, 2000). Therefore, the non-zero contribution
to the YORP effect is due to the body surface that has an irregular shape. Supposing that the
asteroid has a spherical shape (with a mean diameter equal to D), but with asymmetric roughness on
a total mean area equal to S. From Eq. (4), the order of magnitude of the torque resulting from the
YORP effect will be given by:
t
F
E
c
a
E
R
2
(
1
)DSA
(5)
In Equation (5) the value of the torque is zero when the asteroid is perfectly symmetric (ie S = 0).
Now, the asteroid moment of inertia I, is proportional to:
I
2
MD
r
5
D
(6)
In Equation (6), M is the asteroid mass, while r is the bulk density. Considered that the angular
acceleration a is given by t /I, the angular acceleration due to YORP effect is proportional to:
a
)
(
1
A
f r
DR
2
(7)
2
In Equation (7), f = S/D2 is the asteroid surface asymmetry factor. As we can see, the angular
acceleration for YORP effect does not depend on the asteroid rotation frequency, thus any
concentration in the spin distribution tends to be dispersed. From Equation (7) it follows that if two
different asteroids (call them S and C) at a different distance from the Sun, are affected by the same
YORP effect, we must respect the condition:
r
f
S
2
S
2
DR
(
S
S
1
A
S
)
r
f
C
2
2
DR
(
CCC
1
A
C
)
hence:
(8)
12
-
-
(cid:181)
(cid:181)
(cid:181)
-
-
(cid:181)
-
»
-
D
C
D
S
»
R
S
R
C
(
1
(
1
)
)
A
C
A
S
f
f
C
S
r
r
S
C
(9)
To summarize, in Eq. (9) r is the mean asteroid bulk density, D is the asteroid mean diameter, R is
the mean heliocentric distance and f=S/D2 (where S is the mean surface irregularity extension), is
the asteroid surface asymmetry factor. Equation (9) gives an estimate of the diameter ratio that an S
and C-type asteroid has to have if it is to be affected by the same YORP effect. It is interesting to
note that, from Eq. (9), if we know the ratio between the transition diameters, we can derive the
mean bulk density ratio for two different asteroid samples subjects to the YORP effect and that the
knowledge of the mean bulk density of a population, allows the estimate of the other.
4 A first raw test for the YORP model
With the simple scaling law for YORP effect given by Equation (9) it is possible to justify the ratio
between the transition diameters to the Maxwellian distribution for the samples of C and S
asteroids. First, we need to calculate the Bond albedo from geometric albedo using the relationship
(Bowell et al., 1989):
A =
vqp
(10)
In Equation (10), q is the phase integral, while pv is the geometric albedo. Following Bowell et al.,
(1989), there is a relation between the phase integral and the slope parameter G of the H-G
magnitude system:
=
q
.0
290
+
.0
684
G
(11)
0.01, whereas for S is 0.24 --
For C asteroids the mean G value is 0.07 --
Lupishko, 1998). With these values, using Eq. (11) and the previous values for the geometric
albedo, we have the following Bond albedo: AC = 0.02 --
respectively. With respect to other quantities appearing in Eq. (9), for S we put RS = 2.538 --
AU, while for C is RC = 3.013 --
As mentioned in the introduction, for a first test of the model, we need to know a density ratio to
0.01 and AS = 0.09 --
0.01 (Shevchenko and
0.014 AU.
0.03, for C and S
0.011
ensure that we obtain a reasonable value of the ratio between the transition diameters, so we put
r S/r C »
0.4, the mean value that comes from the values of Table 1. Moreover, for simplicity
2.0 --
13
-
-
sake, we take fC/fS = 1, i.e. assuming that the two asteroids have the same asymmetry surface factor.
With these values, from Eq. (9), we found:
D
C
D
S
»
2.02.1 --
(12)
This raw estimate of the ratio from our YORP model reasonably in agreement with the value of
1.5 --
be noted that the used density ratio is an average value of plausible estimates but that the real value
0.1 estimated for the samples of S and C asteroids, indeed 1.5-1.2 »
0.3 --
0.3. It should also
is still very uncertain (see Table 1). So, after this first raw test of the model, it is reasonable to
assume that the ratio value between different diameter transitions to the Maxwellian distribution is
due to the YORP effect.
5 More results from the YORP model
In this section two results from the YORP model are achieved: we provide a new average bulk
density ratio between the two samples of C and S asteroids and show that our model proves the fact
that the absolute magnitude of the asteroid near the transition diameter is approximately the same.
Inverting Eq. (9), using the same values previously used in section 4 for the Bond albedo and
heliocentric distance, and using the transition diameters ratio derived in section 2, we have:
r
r
S
C
3.09.2 --
(13)
This value represents a new estimate of the bulk density ratio between S and C asteroids and it
appears physically reasonable. The indicative trend of the transition diameter for C and S asteroids
on the whole Main Belt, calculated using Eq. (13), is shown in Fig. 6.
Based on this raw estimate, and by referring to Table 1, C-type asteroids appear less dense, or S-
type asteroids are more dense, than estimated until now. Unfortunately, the YORP model does not
allow individual density estimates. However, if we analyze the bulk densities of Table 1, we can see
that the relative error in the average bulk density of S-type is 3.3% only, while for C-type it rises to
21%. The greater scattering for C asteroids is due to the fact that, being on average more distant
from the Sun, it is more difficult to evaluate their gravitational effects over which the bulk density
estimates of Table 1 are based.
14
»
So, from Table 1, taking as reference value the average bulk density of S asteroids, 2.72 --
cm-3, Eq. (13) gives us an average bulk density for C equal to 0.9 --
any other in Table 1. This result should be assumed with caution, because it is strictly model-
0.09 g
0.1 g cm-3, a lower value than
dependent (e.g., for the assumption of the same asymmetry surface factor for both asteroid groups
or if YORP is not the only process affecting the spin). Anyway, this indication of a low bulk density
could be due to a high water ice percentage within the C-type asteroids. The recent discovery of
water ice on the C-type asteroid (24) Themis (a = 3.13 UA from the Sun, diameter of about 200
km), made by means of NASA's Infrared Telescope Facility, agrees with this interpretation (Rivkin
and Emery, 2010). Of course, porosity makes it difficult to establish a direct relationship between
the mean bulk density and the mean chemical composition of an asteroids sample, especially for
smaller asteroids where porosity tends to increase (Baer and Chesley, 2008).
As we have seen in section 2, the best estimate of the transition diameter to the Maxwellian
distribution for S-type asteroids is about 30 km, while for C-type asteroids is about 44 km. If we
calculate the respective visual absolute magnitudes HV, using the standard relation (Fowler and
Chillemi, 1986; Warner et al., 2009):
=
D
1329
Vp
10
VH
5
(14)
replacing the geometric albedo with the Bond albedo (Eq. 10 and 11), we find:
H
H
S
C
=
=
76.14
44.14
(
2
AD
(
S
S
2
AD
CC
)
)
log5.2
10
log5.2
10
(15)
Here, subscripts S and C mean S-type and C-type asteroids, while the diameter D is in km.
Substituting the above values, i.e. AS = 0.09, DS = 30 km, AC = 0.02 and DC = 44 km, in Eq. (15), we
find HS = 10.0 mag and HC = 10.5 mag, hence HC - HS = 0.5 mag. Thus the transition occurs at about
the same absolute magnitude, with a difference of only 0.5 mag.
Could this similarity be due to an observational bias? It is not likely since in paper I it has been
shown that the periods of C-type and S-type asteroids are complete up to about 20 km in diameter
(H »
(9), we can write:
11). Moreover, the YORP model can justify the small magnitude difference. Indeed, from Eq.
15
-
-
-
2
AD
CC
5.0»
AD
S
2
S
(16)
In Eq. (16), the 0.5 value comes from the density ratio given by Eq. (13). So, from Eq. (15), we
obtain:
H
C
H
-=
S
32.0
log5.2
10
2
AD
Cc
2
AD
S
S
»
32.0
log5.2
10
(
5.0
)
4.0
mag (17)
As we can see, the small magnitude difference between the transition diameters for C and S
asteroids is perfectly justified by the YORP model.
To close this section, we will examine an unusual case in the MBAs, the Koronis family. The most
prominent members of this family are of the S-type, have a semimajor axis between 2.83-2.95 AU,
diameters ranging from 24 to 42 km and the estimated age is about 2-3 billion years, younger than
the age of the Solar System. As asteroid collisions suggest, the Koronis family members should
have spin rates that follow a Maxwellian distribution and random spin-axis orientation. In fact, it
was found that the prograde rotators of this family have nearly the same rotation periods and the
spin-axis are parallel in the space (Slivan, 2002). These peculiar features of the Koronis family
could be explained with the YORP effect and spin-orbit resonance (Vokrouhlicky et al., 2003).
Our simple model predicts that at a distance near 3 AU from the Sun, the transition diameter for S-
type asteroids is about 26 km (see Fig. 6), less than the diameter of the largest members of the
Koronis family. This discrepancy may be due at least to two causes.
First, the model does not apply to few asteroids or bodies belonging to families (which were
deleted from the database used, see introduction), second it is reasonable to expect that the surface
of a recently formed body may have a greater number of small-scale irregularities than an older one.
The small-scale irregularities may be due, for example, to the fallout of smaller fragments (e.g.
boulders) on the surface of larger bodies of the family, after the collision from which it originates.
Hereafter, due to continuous impacts with micrometeoroids and interplanetary dust grains, these
structures tend to decay and disappear. So, according to Statler (2009), in the early billions of years
of their life, the members of families are potentially more affected by the YORP than are asteroids
that do not belong to families and it is reasonable to expect a greater transition diameter achieved in
a short time interval. Indeed, Vokrouhlicky et al. (2003), found that an Ida shape model derived
from Galileo spacecraft images evolves twice as fast as a more-rounded shape derived from
lightcurve-inversion techniques.
16
»
-
-
-
-
If we compare MBAs S-type asteroids to those of the Koronis family, from Eq. (9) the ratio
between the asymmetry surface factors is (the superscript letter K stands for Koronis):
K
f
s
f
s
»
K
K
DR
s
s
DR
s
s
2
»
7.2
(18)
This ratio value seems physically accettable. As the decaying process goes on along with the
gradual smoothing of the asteroid surface, the normal collisional evolution may regain importance,
thereby slightly reducing the transition diameter value. Of course, at this stage, this is merely
conjectural . We have not developed a collision-YORP evolution model to verify it.
6 Conclusions
Statistically, analysing two samples of C and S asteroids having a known rotation period, it was
found that the transition diameters to the Maxwellian distribution are different, 30 --
2 km respectively. This ratio between the transition diameters (1.5 --
consequence of the YORP effect on the two asteroids samples which differ in their average distance
0.1) can be explained as a
1 km and 44 --
from the Sun, bulk density and albedo, although other physical causes can not be completely ruled
0.2, compatible with the observed value.
out. A simple theoretical model YORP -based provides, for the transition diameter ratio, the value
of 1.2 --
The YORP model developed here can also be used to estimate a ratio between the bulk densities of
two different asteroids samples. For the sample of S and C asteroids studied here, we found r S/r C »
2.9 --
0.3, a value which appears physically reasonable. Moreover, from Table 1, taking as reference
the less uncertain value for the average bulk density of S-type asteroids, 2.72 --
0.09 g cm-3, it is
possible to estimate an average bulk density for C-type equal to 0.9 --
0.1 g cm-3. This result should
be taken with caution, but it is probably due to a high water ice percentage within the C-type
asteroids sample; however, there is a chance that also porosity plays a major role, and the problem
is still open. The recent discovery of water ice on the C-type asteroid (24) Themis seems to conform
with this interpretation but more data are necessary.
Finally, the model is also suitable to justify the little difference in absolute magnitude for asteroids
C and S near the transition diameter.
Of course, even if we have done our best to consider all uncertainties, the results put forward in this
paper may change in the event that the asteroid's uncertainty on diameters and rotation periods are
reduced and the taxonomic classification is improved.
17
Finally, it should be noted that the proposed explanation (e.g. YORP) for the difference of the
transition diameters is a plausible hypothesis consistent with the data, but it needs more in depth
attention and research work .
Besides, it shouldn't be overinterpreted with the current limited understanding of the physical
properties of asteroids. For these reasons, repeated and more advanced analysis will be necessary
in years to come.
Acknowledgments
A special thanks to Peter Pravec (Astronomical Institute, Czech Republic) for the very constructive
comments on the manuscript, and to Alan W. Harris (Space Science Institute) and Brian D. Warner
(Palmer Divide Observatory) for the quick assistance with the new ALCDB version. Thanks to
Paolo Tanga (Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur), Stefano Mottola (DLR - German Aerospace Center),
and Mario di Martino (Torino Astronomical Observatory) for critically reading the manuscript and
to Giovanni De Sanctis (Torino Astronomical Observatory), for his help in obtaining references .
Thanks to the anonymous referees that with their advice have contributed to the improvement of the
work.
Research on asteroids at OAVdA is supported by Director, Enzo Bertolini, and funded with a
European Social Fund grant from the Regional Government of the Regione Autonoma della Valle
d'Aosta (Italy). This work has made use of NASA's Astrophysics Data System Bibliographic
Services.
Appendix
Estimate of the minimum n value to explore asteroids ' diameter-rotation frequency space,
and of diameter transition uncertainty.
In this appendix we estimate the minimum number of virtual diameters and rotation frequency sets,
that is necessary to simulate to properly explore the entire space within s sigma (where s = 1, 2, 3).
In general, any virtual diameters and rotation frequencies set can be written as:
(
=
r
S
+
eDeD
2
+
,
2
1
1
,
...
,
+
FeD
1
m
m
,
+
d
,...
,
F
k
1
+
d
)
k
(A.1)
Where Di, with i = 1, 2…m, are the diameters observed for m asteroids, while the ei values are the
associated uncertainties with normal distribution (if systematic errors are negligible). Similarly, Fi
18
is the rotation frequency U=2, with i = 1, 2…k (usually k £
m), and di the associated uncertainties.
In our model, the normal distribution has a mean value equal to Di (or Fi) and standard deviation s i
= 0.2·Di (or s i = 0.2·Fi). In the m+k-dimensional space, the volume occupied by all asteroids, with
their uncertainties within ss , is given by:
s (A.2)
i
km
(cid:213) +
=
1
+ =
km
V
2
s
i
The volume in the diameters and rotation frequency space, explored with the creation of n virtual
asteroid sets obtained by adding normal noise to the observed set, can be approximately measured
as follows:
V
n
+
km
(
max
(
n
D
i
)
(
n
D
i
)
)
min
(
max
(
F
i
n
)
(
F
i
n
)
)
min
k
=
1
i
m
=
1
i
(A.3)
Where
n
iD is the n-tuple of virtual diameters and Fi
n is the n-tuple of virtual rotation frequencies,
obtained for the same asteroid, with the simulation of n virtual sets. In this way, the explored
fraction of diameters and rotation frequencies space is given by:
Q
V
=
n V
n
+
km
+
km
(A.4)
Performing some simulations with s = 3, we find a Qn value close to 1 with n »
asteroids and with n »
As explained in section 2 of this paper, for each inferior value diameter of the virtual asteroids
250 for S-type asteroids. These ones are the n values adopted in the paper.
450 for C-type
sample, Kuiper test is carried out. If the rotation frequency distribution is consistent with a
Maxwellian, at least with a 5% confidence level, the value "0"is assigned, otherwise "1". Thus, in
the scale of increasing diameters, at 1 km step, the passage from non-Maxwellian to Maxwellian
distribution is indicated by the transition from 1 to 0 in a string of digits like this: 1-1-1-1-1-0-0-0-
0-0. We call this type of string "step sequence". However, in the sequence of 0 and 1, a first
transition, a return to non-compatibility, a new transition and so on , may happen. For an example
of this case let us imagine a string of this type: 1-1-1-1-1-0-1-0-0-1-0-0-0-0-0. We call this type of
string "many steps sequence". In this case it becomes more difficult to understand where the
transition diameter to Maxwellian exactly falls.
19
(cid:213)
(cid:213)
-
-
»
In the simulations done, the diameter transition was searched within the range 20-70 km for C-type
and in the range 15-50 km for S-type.
If, as a transition diameter, we consider the mean diameter value between "1" and "0" in the first
0.8 km
appearance of the sequence 1-0, the results are the following (the mean of 10 independent runs):
DC = 44.7 --
DS = 29.3 --
To determine the uncertainty due to many steps sequences on the simple step sequences, we have
0.4 km
also considered the transitions diameters given by the sequences 1-0-0 and 1-0-0-0, i.e. where the
Maxwellian character of the distribution remains for one or two times after the first transition. In
this case we have the following results (mean of 10 independent runs):
001
CD
= 44.1 --
1.1 km
0001
CD
= 41.9 --
0.9 km
001
SD
= 29.6 --
0.4 km
0001
SD
= 30.0 --
0.4 km
As we can see, the transition diameter for C-type decreases by 2.8 km, whereas the one of S-type
remains substantially unchanged. On the cautious basis of these results, it seems reasonable
2 km
(without underestimating uncertainties) to assume these values for the transition diameters:
DC = 44 --
DS = 30 --
These are the values given in the text.
1 km
References
Carbognani A., 2010. Statistical comparison of C and S Main Belt asteroids. Icarus 205, 497-504.
Baer J., Chesley, S.R., 2008. Astrometric masses of 21 asteroids, and an integrated asteroid
ephemeris. Celestial Mech Dyn Astr 100, 27-42.
Binzel, R.P, 2003. Spin control for asteroids. Nature 425, 131-132.
Bottke W. F. Jr., Vokrouhlický D., Rubincam D. P., Broz M., 2002. The Effect of Yarkovsky
Thermal Forces on the Dynamical Evolution of Asteroids and Meteoroids. In: Bottke, Jr., W.F.,
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Cellino, A., Paolicchi, P., Binzel, R.P. (Eds). Asteroids III. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp.
395-408.
Bottke, W.F.Jr., Vokrouhlicky, D., Rubincam, D.P., Nesvorny, D., 2006. The Yarkovsky and
YORP Effects: Implications for Asteroid Dynamics. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary
Sciences, 34, 157-191.
Bowell E., Hapke B., Domingue D., Lumme K., Peltoniemi J., Harris A.W., 1989. Application of
Photometric Models to Asteroids. In: Binzel, R.P., Gehrels, T., Matthews, S.M., (Eds). Asteroids II.
University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 524-556.
Britt D.T., Yeomans D., Housen K., Consolmagno G.J., 2002. Asteroid Density, Porosity, and
Structure. In: Bottke, Jr., W.F., Cellino, A., Paolicchi, P., Binzel, R.P. (Eds). Asteroids III.
University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 395-408.
Farinella, P., Vokrouhlicky, D., Hartmann W.K., 1998. Meteorite delivery via Yarkowsky orbital
drift. Icarus 132, 378-387.
Farinella, P., Paolicchi, P., Zappalà, V., 1981. Analysis of the spin rate distribution of asteroids.
Astron & Astrophys, 104, 159-165.
Fowler, J.W., Chillemi, J.R., 1992. IRAS asteroid data processing. In The IRAS Minor Planet
Survey (ed. E.F. Tedesco), pp. 17 -- 43. Tech. Rep. PL-TR-92-2049, Phillips Laboratory, Hanscom
Air Force Base, Massachusetts, USA.
Krasinsky, G.A., Pitjeva, E.V., Vasilyev, M.V., Yagudina, E. I., 2002. Hidden Mass in the Asteroid
Belt. Icarus 158, 98-105.
Minor Planet Center, 2010. MPCORB.
http://www.minorplanetcenter.org/iau/MPCORB.html
Pravec, P., Harris, A.W., 2000. Fast and slow rotation of asteroids. Icarus, 148, 12-20.
21
Pravec, P., Harris, A.W., Michalowski, T., 2002. Asteroid rotations. In: Bottke, Jr., W.F., Cellino,
A., Paolicchi, P., Binzel, R.P. (Eds). Asteroids III. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 113-
122.
Pravec, P., and 10 colleagues, 2008. Spin rate distribution of small asteroids. Icarus, 197, 497-504.
Press, H.W., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., Flannery, B.P., 1992. Chapter 14. Statistical
description of data. In: Numerical Recipes in C. 2nd edition, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge,
UK, pp. 620-628.
Rivkin A.S., Emery J.P., 2010. Detection of ice and organics on an asteroidal surface. Nature 464,
1322-1323.
Rubincam, D.P., 2000. Radiative spin-up and spin-down of small asteroids. Icarus 148, 2-11.
Shevchenko, V.G, Lupishko, D.F., 1998. Optical properties of asteroids from photometric data.
Solar System Research 32, 220-232.
Slivan S.M., 2002. Spin vector alignment of Koronis family asteroids. Nature 419, 49-51.
Spitale, J., Greenberg, R., 2001. Numerical evaluation of the general Yarkovsky effect: Effects on
semi-major axis, Icarus 149, 222-234.
Statler, T. S., 2009. Extreme sensitivity of the YORP effect to small-scale topography. Icarus 202,
502-513.
Tedesco, E.F., Noah, P.V., Noah, M., Price S.D., 2002. The Supplemental IRAS Minor Planet
Survey. Astronomical Journal 123, 1056-1085.
Vokrouhlicky, D., Nesvorny, D., Bottke, W.F., 2003. The vector alignments of asteroid spins by
thermal torques. Nature 425, 147-151.
Warner, B.D., Harris, A.W, Pravecc, P., 2009. The asteroid lightcurve database. Icarus, 202, 134-
146.
22
The dataset is available on http://www.minorplanetobserver.com/astlc/LightcurveParameters.htm.
Table 1
Dynamical bulk density estimate for C and S Main Belt asteroid (Krasinsky et al., 2002). The bulk
density values are in g cm-3. For the physical meaning of solutions 2, 3 and 4 see the paper
mentioned above. The last column shows the results derived from the YORP model discussed in the
text.
Largest asteroids number
r S
r C
r S/r C
Table 2
Solution 2
Solution 3
Solution 4
YORP model
300
2.71 --
1.34 --
2.02 --
0.01
0.04
0.06
351
2.82 --
1.12 --
2.52 --
0.03
0.04
0.09
351
2.64 --
1.74 --
1.52 --
0.08
0.11
0.11
481
---
0.9 --
2.9 --
0.1
0.3
List of C and S asteroids discarded around Maxwellian transition diameter.
S-type asteroids discarded (20-50 km range)
Motivation
Probably C-type for pv value
C-type
X-type
Asteroids progressive numbers
(829), (1159), (1233), (1244)
(723)
(1407)
C-type asteroids discarded (30-60 km range)
Motivation
Asteroids progressive numbers
Probably S-type for pv value
(297), (430), (655), (894), (987), (1113), (1116),
X-type
No physical data
Table 3
(1232), (1276), (1481), (1572)
(1039), (1323), (1428), (1502)
(942), (1125), (1157), (1175), (1319), (1488),
(1910), (2104), (2193), (2288), (2323), (2347),
(2612), (2802), (3015), (3106), (3259), (3300),
(3431), (3514), (3557), (3761), (3843), (4045),
(5357), (6393), (12559)
Fractions of asteroids with diameters from SIMPS vs. lower diameter limit.
23
Full sample of S-type
Full sample of C-type
Inferior diameter value (km)
asteroids
asteroids
0.35
0.60
0.95
0.95
0.68
0.73
0.96
0.98
1
10
50
100
Fig. 1 Comparison between the semimajor axis distributions for C (black bar) and S (grey bar)
MBAs of the samples. The distribution dichotomy between the two samples is evident.
24
Fig. 2 The three-dimensional Maxwellian distribution vs the rotation frequency distribution (not
normalized) for the sample of 415 C-type MBAs in the range 15-200 km. There is an excess of slow
rotators, a lack of medium rotators and an excess of fast rotators.
25
Fig. 3 The three-dimensional Maxwellian distribution vs the rotation frequency distribution (not
normalized) for the sample of 176 C-type MBAs in the range 48-200 km. The slow/fast rotators
excess is considerably reduced respect to Fig. 2.
26
Fig. 4 The three-dimensional Maxwellian distribution vs the rotation frequency distribution (not
normalized) for the sample of 194 S-type MBAs in the range 15-200 km. As for C asteroids, there is
an excess of slow rotators, a lack of medium rotators and an excess of fast rotators.
27
Fig. 5 The three-dimensional Maxwellian distribution vs the rotation frequency distribution (not
normalized) for the sample of 99 S-type MBAs in the range 33-200 km. The slow/fast rotators
excess is considerably reduced respect to Fig. 4.
28
Fig. 6 Estimated diameter transition to Maxwellian distribution, from Eq. (9), for C (black line) and
S (grey line) MBAs. The density ratio adopted here is from Eq. (13).
29
|
1106.1411 | 2 | 1106 | 2012-03-13T18:46:45 | Transient conditions for biogenesis on low-mass exoplanets with escaping hydrogen atmospheres | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | Exoplanets with lower equilibrium temperatures than Earth and primordial hydrogen atmospheres that evaporate after formation should pass through transient periods where oceans can form on their surfaces, as liquid water can form below a few thousand bar pressure and H2-H2 collision-induced absorption provides significant greenhouse warming. The duration of the transient period depends on the planet size, starting H2 inventory and star type, with the longest periods typically occurring for planets around M-class stars. As pre-biotic compounds readily form in the reducing chemistry of hydrogen-rich atmospheres, conditions on these planets could be favourable to the emergence of life. The ultimate fate of any emergent organisms under such conditions would depend on their ability to adapt to (or modify) their gradually cooling environment. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph |
Transient conditions for biogenesis on
low-mass exoplanets with escaping hydrogen
atmospheres
R. Wordsworth a,1
aLaboratoire de M´et´erologie Dynamique, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace, Paris,
France.
Abstract
Exoplanets with lower equilibrium temperatures than Earth and primordial hy-
drogen atmospheres that evaporate after formation should pass through transient
periods where oceans can form on their surfaces, as liquid water can form below
a few thousand bar pressure and H2-H2 collision-induced absorption provides sig-
nificant greenhouse warming. The duration of the transient period depends on the
planet size, starting H2 inventory and star type, with the longest periods typically
occurring for planets around M-class stars. As pre-biotic compounds readily form in
the reducing chemistry of hydrogen-rich atmospheres, conditions on these planets
could be favourable to the emergence of life. The ultimate fate of any emergent or-
ganisms under such conditions would depend on their ability to adapt to (or modify)
their gradually cooling environment.
Key words: Prebiotic environments; Atmospheres, evolution; Terrestrial planets;
Extrasolar planets; Solar radiation
1
Introduction
Recent developments in exoplanet characterization [e.g., Tinetti et al., 2007,
Knutson et al., 2007, Bean et al., 2010] have raised the possibility that in
the relatively near future, we may be able to search for biosignatures in the
atmospheres of terrestrial-mass planets. However, as Earth is the only current
example of a life-supporting world that we know of, there is still no consensus
as to the form such biosignatures will take. More fundamentally, there are
1 Current address: Department of the Geological Sciences, University of Chicago,
60637 IL, USA
Preprint submitted to Elsevier
29 October 2018
still major unknowns as to the prevalence of conditions necessary to create
and sustain life on other planets in general.
To date, much of the discussion has centered on the concept of the habitabil-
ity zone - the orbital range around a star in which temperatures are in the
right range for a planet to have surface liquid water. The standard definition
of this region [Kasting et al., 1993] is based on the assumption that a habit-
able planet will have a climate dominated by the greenhouse warming of CO2
and H2O, with temperature regulation provided by the carbonate-silicate cy-
cle via plate tectonics. Alternative hypotheses exist: for example, Stevenson
[1999] proposed that if they retain primordial H2-He envelopes, planetary em-
bryos ejected from their systems during planet formation could be kept warm
enough for surface liquid water even as they drift through interstellar space.
Following this, Pierrehumbert and Gaidos [2011] noted that orbitally bound
exoplanets far from their host stars might also be habitable to life if they
form with relatively thin hydrogen envelopes and manage to preserve them
against escape. Both these studies suggest that a definition of the habitable
zone based on H2O-CO2 warming only may be too narrow. However, the per-
centage of planets left with exactly the right atmospheric pressures to allow
habitable temperatures after the early stages of atmospheric erosion is likely
to be small, and the observation of rocky planets that are free-floating or in
distant orbits around other stars is technically challenging.
Here the impact of hydrogen greenhouse warming is considered for exoplanets
that are closer-in and hence may lose their hydrogen atmospheres entirely.
Major uncertainties remain in planetary formation theory, but it is generally
understood that planets of between 1 and 20 Earth masses can form with
primordial hydrogen envelopes either due to capture of the gas from the so-
lar nebula [Rafikov, 2006] or outgassing during accretion [Elkins-Tanton and
Seager, 2008]. In the case of Earth and Venus, these envelopes may have been
lost to space extremely rapidly, while as noted by Stevenson [1999] and Pier-
rehumbert and Gaidos [2011], planets that are in distant orbits or are ejected
to interstellar space during formation can retain them permanently. In the
intermediate situations where hydrogen atmospheres persist some time after
formation but are eventually removed, the planet's climate will clearly evolve
over time. Here I argue that during this evolution, transient periods will occur
where water exists as a liquid on the planet's surface, and organic molecules
may form in the atmosphere via photochemistry.
In the following section, the greenhouse effect of hydrogen atmospheres is
discussed and an empirical expression for the pressure necessary to maintain
surface temperatures in the correct range for liquid water is derived. Next, a
simple assessment of atmospheric loss due to thermal escape is presented, and
transient habitable times as a function of planet mass, orbital distance and
starting hydrogen inventory are estimated. Finally, the effects of processes not
2
included in the model are considered, along with the potential implications of
the results.
2 Analysis
2.1 Climate
In atmospheres dominated by hydrogen, the main opacity source in the in-
frared is H2-H2 collision-induced absorption (CIA). Other gases can also con-
tribute to infrared opacity and hence greenhouse warming, but only if they
are present in sufficient amounts in the mid- to high atmosphere to absorb in
the spectral regions where hydrogen becomes transparent. Helium can warm
through He-H2 or He-He CIA, but its effects should be secondary to those of
hydrogen. In addition, it will not be present in large quantities if the atmo-
sphere is created by accretion outgassing [Elkins-Tanton and Seager, 2008].
For temperatures of a few hundred Kelvin or less, the dominant equilibrium
O-C-N species will be H2O, CH4 and NH3 if hydrogen is the majority gas, as
in the atmospheres of the Solar System gas giants [e.g. Moses et al., 2011].
The primary effect of these gases should be to increase greenhouse warming,
although they can also influence the climate via cloud and haze formation (see
Discussion). For simplicity, the climatic effect of gases other than H2 is ne-
glected in the main part of this analysis, although some calculations involving
H2-H2O are also discussed.
To allow rapid assessment of climate for a range of cases, one-dimensional
radiative-convective calculations were used to produce an analytical expres-
sion for the globally averaged outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) Fout and
shortwave albedo A assuming pure H2 atmospheres. The model used was sim-
ilar to that described in Wordsworth et al. [2010a,b]: there were 32 spectral
bands in the longwave and 36 in the shortwave, and AD Leo and solar data
[Segura et al., 2005] were used for M-class and G-class stellar spectra, respec-
tively. A two-stream scheme [Toon et al., 1989] was used to compute fluxes,
and the radiative effects of Rayleigh scattering in the visible were taken into
account using the H2 refractive index from Hecht [2001].
Simulations were performed with specific heat capacity cp = 14.31 kJ kg−1
K−1 [Lide, 2000, value at 300 K] and molar mass µH2 = 2.02 g to calculate
Fout as a function of surface pressure ps and gravity g. Hydrogen CIA opaci-
ties were calculated from tabulated spectral absorption data [Borysow, 2002].
The vertical temperature profile was assumed to follow the dry ideal adiabat
T (z) = Ts − (g/cp)z, with the transition to an isothermal region ('strato-
sphere') at low pressures assumed to occur at 100 K (Figure 1). Comparison
3
with a time-stepping version of the model and simulations where the isother-
mal transition was neglected entirely showed that the stratospheric temper-
ature did not have a significant influence on the value of Fout, in agreement
with previous studies [Pierrehumbert and Gaidos, 2011].
We are most interested in greenhouse warming for surface temperatures in the
range Tmin < Ts < Tmax, where {Tmin, Tmax} = {273, 333} K are conservative
temperature limits for habitability to Earth-like microbial life. The variation
of the effective OLR Fout/σT 4
s with temperature was found to be slow, so cal-
culations were performed at Ts = 300 K only and the temperature dependence
of the effective OLR was neglected. Given this simplification, the expression
Fout/σT 4
s = ap−b
s gb/2∗
(1)
was calculated from the numerical results within the limits 0.5 < ps < 10 bar
and 10 < g < 30 ms−2 using a logarithmic least squares fit (see Figure 2).
Here ps is in bars, a = 0.279, b = 1.123, g∗ = g/gref and gref = 20.0 ms−2.
To determine the potential error in the analysis due to the assumption of pure
H2 atmospheres, a few additional calculations were performed including the
presence of water vapour. In this case, saturation of H2O vapour in the atmo-
sphere was assumed, and the lapse rate was calculated with H2O assumed to
be an ideal gas. The effect of H2O on the radiative transfer was included in
a similar way to in previous studies [e.g. Wordsworth et al., 2010b]. High res-
olution spectra were computed from the HITRAN database [Rothman et al.,
2009] on a 6 × 8 × 8 temperature, pressure and H2O volume mixing ratio grid
with values T = {100, 150, . . . , 350} K, p = {10−2, 10−1, . . . , 105} mbar and
qH2O = {10−7, 10−6, . . . , 100}, respectively, before conversion to a correlated-k
format for use in the radiative-convective model.
Figure 1 shows the temperature profiles vs. pressure for pure H2 and H2-H2O
atmospheres with constant stratospheric temperatures of 100 K. Figure 2
shows the resulting effective OLR calculated using the radiative-convective
model for a planet with g = gref . As can be seen, water vapour changes the
lapse rate in the low atmosphere, primarily via latent heat release, but its
effects decrease rapidly as the total pressure increases beyond a few fractions
of a bar (the vapour pressure of H2O is ∼ 0.035 bar at 300 K). These lapse
rate changes were more than compensated for climatically by increased in-
frared absorption - as shown by Figure 2, water vapour generally decreased
the effective OLR and hence increased the greenhouse effect. Nonetheless, its
effects were not significant for pH 2 values above about 0.4 bar. Hence equation
(1) was judged an acceptable approximation for use in the following analysis.
In the visible, the radiative transfer in pure H2 atmospheres is dominated by
a combination of CIA and Rayleigh scattering. For surface pressures greater
4
than around 20 bar, the fraction of starlight reaching the surface is small, and
calculation of the surface temperature becomes difficult without knowledge of
the planet's internal heat flux. In this analysis, all climate calculations were
restricted to atmospheric pressures of 10 bar or less, for which it was sufficient
to determine the planet's bond albedo in the visible. A surface albedo of 0.2
(typical for a rocky planet) was assumed. Albedos A (cid:39) 0.25+0.15log10(ps[bar])
and (cid:39) 0.15 were found for G-class and M-class stars, respectively. The latter
values were lower and approximately constant because the effects of Rayleigh
scattering depend strongly on wavelength, and M-class stars have redder spec-
tra. The variation of albedo with surface gravity was found to be small (under
0.025 at Ts = 300 K) and hence ignored. The effect of water vapour on albedo
due to absorption was slightly greater (maximum decrease of ∼ 0.1), but given
the fact that it tended to increase warming and the inherent uncertainties due
to haze and cloud cover, it was also neglected for simplicity. Finally, the re-
duction in visible flux early in the lifetime of G-class stars [Gough, 1981] was
taken into account, with the G-star stellar luminosity taken to be L = 0.7L(cid:12).
In the M-class case, the value L = 0.01205L(cid:12) (representative of the red dwarf
GJ581; von Braun et al. [2011]) was used.
Planets with slowly escaping atmospheres will be in thermal equilibrium,
Fout = Fin, if the loss timescale tloss is much longer than the radiative adjust-
ment timescale trad = cppsTs/gσT 4
e [Goody and Yung, 1989] 2 , where σ is the
Stefan-Boltzmann constant, g is gravity and Te is the characteristic emission
temperature. Hydrogen has a mean optical depth of 1 in the infrared at around
0.2 bar pressure, so for e.g., a 20 bar atmosphere with surface temperature
300 K, the emission temperature should be Te = Ts(pe/ps)R/(cpµH2 ) ∼ 80 K,
where R is the ideal gas constant. This yields trad = 12, 000 years for an
Earth-gravity planet. The presence of a primordial steam atmosphere could
complicate this picture [e.g. Valencia et al., 2008], but only for planets that
lose their entire hydrogen inventory in the first few million years after forma-
tion. In the following analysis this possibility is neglected and Fout = Fin is
assumed.
4(1 − A)(L/4πd2), where L is the stellar luminosity and d
Writing Fin = 1
the orbital distance, and making the standard 1D modelling assumption of
efficient horizontal heat transport by the atmosphere, we find
(cid:32) G
(cid:33)1/2
(cid:32)
M 1/2−β
∝ M 0.23T 3.56
d1.78(1 − A)−0.89
s
ps =
ν2gref
aσT 4
s
(1 − A)L/16πd2
(cid:33)1/b
,
(2)
2 Here we use Ts rather than the smaller Te as an upper limit estimate of the mean
atmospheric temperature.
5
where the mass-radius relation r = (αr⊕/M β⊕)M β = νM β from Sotin et al.
[2007] is used to write g in terms of the planetary mass M . For simplicity
the rocky planet values α = 1.0 and β = 0.274 are assumed throughout
the calculation. The approximately constant albedo in the M-star case allows
direct calculation of ps[M, d, Ts], while in the G-star case, iteration is necessary
for a self-consistent calculation. For an example 5M⊕ rocky planet at 2.5 AU
around a Sun-like star with L = 0.7L(cid:12), iteration of (2) predicts an albedo
of 0.35 and 4.3 bars of H2 necessary to maintain a surface temperature of
300 K. The saturation temperature of H2 at this pressure is less than 25 K
[Lide, 2000], so atmospheric condensation does not occur at any altitude. As
Stevenson [1999] and Pierrehumbert and Gaidos [2011] have already noted,
hydrogen is an extremely potent, effectively incondensible greenhouse gas. Its
main disadvantage in the context of achieving habitable temperatures is of
course that usually, either far too much or too little of it is present.
2.2 Atmospheric escape
Unless hydrogen is continuously supplied via vulcanism or other surface pro-
cesses at the same rate at which it escapes, habitable conditions due to H2-H2
warming will clearly be transient on exoplanets with escaping atmospheres.
The habitable duration will depend primarily on the host star's extreme ul-
traviolet (XUV) emission and the planet's size and orbital distance. Erosion
due to the stellar wind and meteorite impacts can also play a role in hydrogen
loss from rocky planets, but thermal / hydrodynamic escape processes should
dominate in the early phase of a system's evolution when stellar XUV levels
are high [Tian et al., 2005].
For an atmosphere undergoing thermal escape, the flux of hydrogen to space
depends primarily on the thermal escape parameter λ = r/Hexo, where Hexo =
kBTexo/mHg is the scale height, kB is the Boltzmann constant, Texo is the
temperature just below the exobase (exospheric temperature) and mH is the
atomic mass of hydrogen 3 . The exospheric temperature is the most important
unknown in λ. It may depend on factors such as the XUV heating, coupling
with the lower atmosphere via thermal conduction and wave propagation, and
cooling to space due to radiatively active molecules / ions such as H+
3 [e.g.,
Koskinen et al., 2007]. Here Texo is calculated using the approach of Lammer
et al. [2003] as
T s
exo = CFXU V /g + T s
min,
(3)
3 In the main part of this analysis efficient H2 dissociation is assumed, so that the
dominant escaping species is atomic hydrogen.
6
where FXU V is the stellar XUV flux, Tmin the temperature at the base of the
thermosphere, s = 0.73 and C = 1.67 × 106 Ks W−1 m3 s−2. In Lammer et al.
[2003], it was assumed following Bauer [1971] that Texo is primarily determined
by a balance between XUV energy input and energy loss to the lower atmo-
sphere due to thermal conduction, with the latter equal to K(Texo) = K0T s
ergs K−1 cm−1 s−1, where K0 = 16.4 for atomic hydrogen. This approach ne-
glects the possible effects of radiative cooling and internal heat sources, which
we discuss later.
exo
The temperature Tmin is included to account for conductive coupling between
the thermosphere and the lower atmosphere. For all calculations assuming
XUV-dominated escape, we set this parameter to the representative cold-trap
temperature 100 K. However, the exact value of Tmin had a negligible influence
on the results, as by the time the exospheric temperature drops to a few
hundred Kelvin or lower, thermal escape rates are extremely small for planets
of mass greater than ∼ 1 mE.
The stellar XUV flux depends primarily on the star type and age. Although
XUV emissions may vary widely in a given stellar population (particularly
for M-stars) the XUV flux tends to saturate at a value FXU V ∼ 10−3.1L/4πd2
early in a star's lifetime, for a time tXU V that ranges from around 100 million
years (G-stars) to 1 billion years (M-stars) [Selsis et al., 2007]. After this it
decays relatively rapidly according to a power law [Ribas et al., 2005]. In
most cases, the majority of atmospheric erosion therefore occurs early in a
planet's lifetime. When other heating sources are negligible, an upper limit on
atmospheric escape
φ =
FXU V
4r
=
FXU V
4νM β
[Pa s−1]
(4)
where is an efficiency factor, can be derived. Equation (4) assumes that the
averaged XUV energy input to the atmosphere FXU V /4 (× the factor ) is used
to overcome the gravitational potential energy of exospheric hydrogen atoms.
For convenience when coupling with the climate equations, the hydrogen flux
is converted to a loss rate of surface pressure per unit time. This makes use of
the fact that surface pressure is equal to mH2g times the area number density
of H2 molecules, and the potential energy of one hydrogen atom is GM mH/r
(with mH2 ≈ 2mH).
This simple energy balance approach gives a reasonable estimate of escape
rates for values of λ equal to or less than around 2.8, for which the escape can
be regarded as hydrodynamic [Volkov et al., 2011]. For extremely small values
of λ, the outer layers of the atmosphere extend to several planetary radii and
7
the value of φ may be greater than that given in (4). Hydrodynamic escape in
such atmospheres is a formidable problem involving three-dimensional effects
and coupled physics/chemistry, which we do not attempt to tackle here. As will
be seen, the frequency of transient habitable conditions is most likely limited
by the total amount of hydrogen that can be removed from the atmosphere,
so the use of (4) allows for a conservative estimate.
For λ > 2.8, the flux of hydrogen to space was estimated from the Jeans
formula
φ = vpnexof (λ)mHg,
[Pa s−1]
(5)
where vp = (2kBTexo/mH)1/2 is the most probable particle speed, nexo = 1/
(σHHexo) is the particle number density at the exobase, σH = π(3.1 × 10−12)2 m2
√
is the hydrogen atom collision cross-section 4 and f (λ) = (1 + λ)e−λ/2
π is
the fraction of upward-moving particles with speed greater than the escape
velocity.
Figure 3 shows the total quantity of hydrogen that can be lost to space in
time tXU V as a function of planet mass and orbital distance for G- and M-class
stars. Due to the relatively small radii of rocky planets and high exospheric
temperatures under elevated XUV conditions, energy-limited loss governed by
(4) occurs instead of Jeans escape almost everywhere. As can be seen, more
than 100 bars of hydrogen may be lost in G-class systems for orbits closer
than 1.5 AU, while for M-class systems, the 100-bar boundary is 0.5-0.7 AU.
Accounting for the slight difference in luminosities used, these results are in
approximate agreement with those of Pierrehumbert and Gaidos [2011], al-
though they predict less escape than that shown in Figure 3 for more distant
orbits. Pierrehumbert and Gaidos [2011] used a slightly more complex exo-
sphere model that predicted the exospheric temperature numerically, but still
neglected all significant radiative cooling effects. Onset of Jeans escape at
lower values of d and M due to lower exospheric temperatures in their model
is the most likely cause of the difference in the results.
Given our simplifying assumption of constant saturated XUV flux throughout
the time period tXU V , (2), (4) and (5) can be combined to give an estimate of
the duration of habitable conditions on the planet's surface
∆thab = [p(Tmax) − p(Tmin)]/φ.
(6)
Figure 4 shows ∆thab in G- and M-class systems, assuming various initial
H2 inventories p0. In situations where there is too little atmospheric loss to
reach p(Tmax) after tXU V , the results have not been plotted. As can be seen,
4 Value at 1000 K, taken from Pierrehumbert [2011].
8
transient habitable conditions occur for many values of d, M and p0. The
habitable duration ∆thab varies widely, from a few thousand years for close-in
planets to values approaching tXU V for more distant ones. In some cases, the
amount of atmospheric erosion is just right to leave the planet with surface
temperatures in the habitable range permanently (black regions in Fig. 4).
However, these cases represent only a small fraction of the total.
The starting H2 pressure is a critical factor in the calculation. As Figure 4
shows, for large values of p0 only planets close to the star experience transient
habitable periods. Pierrehumbert and Gaidos [2011] argue based on the results
of Rafikov [2006] that initial H2 pressures of 1-100 bar are possible, although
it is likely that the exact amount in any situation will depend sensitively on
the nature of accretion in the final stages of planet formation. As M-stars tend
to have elevated XUV levels for longer periods than G-stars, planets around
them can lose larger quantities of hydrogen, and hence have a greater chance
of experiencing transient hydrogen-induced habitable periods given starting
H2 pressures of greater than a few tens of bars.
The influence of exospheric radiative cooling on escape were neglected in
this analysis for simplicity, but it could nonetheless be important in some
cases. The effect of H+
3 cooling can be crudely investigated by fixing the ex-
ospheric temperature at a constant value for XUV levels below the critical
XU V ∼ 0.18 W m−2 given by Koskinen et al. [2007]. If we assume
threshold F crit
XU V , based
Texo = 3000 K for all planets outside a radius dcrit =
on their Fig. 1, λ ≤ 2.8 then requires M ≤ 1.16M⊕. For larger planetary
masses, inefficient Jeans escape dominates and the amount of hydrogen re-
moved from the atmosphere is significantly reduced. Unfortunately, Koskinen
et al. [2007] examined only Jupiter-mass planets around Sun-like stars in their
study, so we are unable to investigate the scaling of Texo with planetary mass
and star type here. However, if H+
3 cooling effects for terrestrial-mass planets
are as strong as those for gas giants, transient habitable periods may be less
common outside the critical radius than Fig. 4 suggests.
10−3.1L/4πF crit
(cid:113)
For low-mass planets, thermal escape processes that do not depend on the
stellar XUV flux may also contribute to H2 loss and hence eventual transient
habitability. In the Solar System, the variation in mean exospheric tempera-
tures for the gas giants is surprisingly small, with typical values in the range
700 − 1000 K despite the large differences in solar XUV insolation. Internal
processes such as heating due to magnetic field ion acceleration and gravity
wave breaking are believed to dominate the energy budget [Lunine, 1993].
If similar mechanisms were present for rocky exoplanets with hydrogen en-
velopes, they would continue to lose gas to space even after the initial phase
of saturated stellar XUV fluxes. Figure 5 shows the amount of hydrogen lost
after 10 GYr due to atmospheric Jeans escape only, for planets of different
masses and fixed Texo values. As can be seen, planets of Earth mass or lower
9
can continue to lose significant amounts of hydrogen even far from their host
star if their exospheric temperatures remain above ∼750 K. Such bodies will of
course be difficult to observe, but the example serves to illustrate the variety
of situations that may lead to transient habitable scenarios.
3 Discussion
In summary, if a planet with equilibrium temperature lower than that of Earth
has multiple bars of hydrogen in its atmosphere early in its evolution (either
due to direct capture from the nebula or outgassing after accretion) but subse-
quently loses it due to escape, it will almost certainly pass through a transient
state where liquid water can form on its surface. It has been shown that the
duration of habitable conditions can range from thousands to hundreds of mil-
lions of years, although planets left with exactly the right amount of hydrogen
for permanent habitable conditions only occur in rare cases.
Several effects that we have not considered could alter the simple analysis
presented here. For one, we have assumed a short, discrete phase of planetary
accretion, but meteorite impacts can continue long after the main stages of
formation are over. Events such as the Late Heavy Bombardment in the Solar
System could erode primordial hydrogen atmospheres and evaporate oceans,
potentially destroying any emerging life. However, as noted by Abramov and
Mojzsis [2009], even on an Earth-mass planet relatively large impactors (r ≥
50 km) are incapable of sterilizing the entire surface.
Perhaps more restrictive is the fact that we have only described the evolu-
tion of pure H2 atmospheres. For more realistic hydrogen-dominated atmo-
spheres containing a mixture of gases, other sources of opacity will be present
that could increase greenhouse warming. In addition, photochemistry in the
planet's upper atmosphere can lead to the formation of aerosols and organic
hazes, which can increase the planetary albedo or cause 'anti-greenhouse' ef-
fects [e.g., McKay et al., 1991]. These processes could quantitatively alter
the results described here, and should be investigated in future using more
detailed models. Nonetheless, it is difficult to see how they could invalidate
the basic mechanism entirely. The effectiveness of hydrogen as a greenhouse
gas means that planets with primordial H2 envelopes should have high initial
surface temperatures even if they form far from the host star. In cases where
the hydrogen envelope is later removed and the planets receive significantly
less starlight than Earth, transient periods of habitable surface temperatures
of some duration should therefore always result.
The reducing chemistry of hydrogen-rich atmospheres provides fertile con-
ditions for the formation of some of the basic building blocks of life, such as
10
amino acids and ribonucleotides [Miller, 1953, Ferris et al., 1978, Powner et al.,
2009]. Provided C, N and O-bearing species are also present, an exoplanet with
a slowly evaporating hydrogen atmosphere would likely therefore experience a
steady rain of organic compounds towards the surface due to photolysis in the
upper atmosphere. If the atmosphere were dense enough to cause high tem-
peratures at the surface, these compounds would be destroyed by thermolysis
relatively rapidly. However, as the greenhouse effect of hydrogen diminished,
temperatures would decrease, allowing them to begin to accumulating on the
surface. Moderately high temperatures (60 - 100 ◦C) dramatically accelerate
key reactions in primordial biochemistry [Stockbridge et al., 2010], so the ini-
tial stages of a planet's transiently habitable period might provide particularly
favourable conditions for the development of complex reaction pathways on
the surface.
In an environment dominated by hydrogen-bearing species, the efficiency of
redox reactions available for metabolism would clearly be very different from
that of either present-day Earth or the weakly reducing N2-CO2-H2O atmo-
spheres generally believed to be representative of the Archean [e.g. Kasting,
1993]. Nonetheless, emergent organisms could potentially extract energy from
a variety of mechanisms. Volcanic emission of gases such as CO2 or sulphate
aerosols from an oxidising mantle [Elkins-Tanton and Seager, 2008] would al-
low for some of the redox reactions already known to be used by methanogens
and sulphur-reducing bacteria on Earth. Photochemistry itself provides fur-
ther possibilities: by definition it is driven by the free energy from photons and
as such results in compounds that are out of equilibrium with their environ-
ment [Pascal and Boiteau, 2011]. To give one example, dissociation of water
vapour and the subsequent loss of hydrogen to space results in highly reactive
radicals such as OH*, which can cause the formation of oxidized trace species
(e.g. H2O2) that are transported to the surface via rainout.
After the loss of the hydrogen envelope in these scenarios, heavier gases such
as methane or carbon dioxide could remain in the atmosphere, depending
on their volatility and escape rates. If these gases provided insufficient green-
house warming to keep temperatures above 0 ◦C, surface liquid water would no
longer be possible globally, although processes such as vulcanism and geother-
mal heating would still allow locally habitable regions and hence some further
opportunity for life to develop. Investigating the end state of atmospheric
evolution self-consistently in these cases, while challenging, would be an inter-
esting subject for future research.
If life readily emerges under these conditions but cannot adapt to the changing
climate by altering either itself or its environment, transient hydrogen green-
house warming may be of little relevance to the search for life around other
stars. In this case, constraints based on abiotic climate stabilization mecha-
nisms such as the carbonate-silicate cycle [Walker et al., 1981] will probably
11
determine the frequency of life-supporting planets. The carbonate-silicate cy-
cle requires plate tectonics for CO2 recycling, and the extent to which this
phenomenon depends on a planet's mass, internal heat sources and man-
tle composition is still under investigation [Valencia et al., 2007, Korenaga,
2010]. If only a sub-set of rocky planets in the CO2 habitable zone have ac-
tive carbonate-silicate cycles, the prevalence of life-supporting planets in the
stellar neighborhood could therefore be small.
If, however, the adaptability of life to diverse habitats through evolution and
environmental modification is high, the frequency of conditions allowing its
formation may be the critical factor. Life on Earth is adapted to a wide range
of physical and chemical environments, and has colonized all regions of the
planet where even minimal liquid water is present, including the Antarctic sub-
surface [Cary et al., 2010]. It has been shown elsewhere [Laughlin and Adams,
2000, Abbot and Switzer, 2011] that even planets receiving essentially no stel-
lar flux are able to maintain ice-covered liquid oceans through geothermal
heating alone. Hence even in the absence of other warming processes, local-
ized habitable environments would remain in the time after transient hydrogen
warming had ceased.
Since the Archean era, life has also extensively modified the composition of
the atmosphere. The extent to which this modification has regulated surface
temperatures to optimize planetary habitability remains a subject of intense
debate [e.g., Lovelock and Margulis, 1974, Kirchner, 2003], and resolving the
argument has proved difficult, in part due to our inability to study the Earth's
atmosphere in different epochs directly. However, it has been shown here that
appropriate conditions for the origin of life may occur in a fairly wide range
of cases. Hence if living ecosystems are capable of regulating global climate,
even planets outside the standard CO2-warming habitable zone might retain
biospheres for longer periods. The boundaries of the CO2 habitable zone are
fairly well-defined as a function of star type, and global biospheres may be
detectable from e.g., the presence of non-equilibrium gases in a planet's atmo-
sphere. Given the planned future searches for nearby planets with biosigna-
tures, therefore, in theory it could eventually be possible to assess the relative
importance of abiotic vs. biotic climate stabilization processes directly.
Acknowledgements
This article has benefited from fruitful discussions with Franck Selsis, Fran¸cois
Forget, Robert Pascal and Lee Grenfell.
12
References
D. S. Abbot and E. R. Switzer. The Steppenwolf: A Proposal for a Habitable
Planet in Interstellar Space. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 735:L27,
July 2011. doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/735/2/L27.
O. Abramov and S. J. Mojzsis. Microbial habitability of the Hadean Earth
during the late heavy bombardment. Nature, 459:419 -- 422, May 2009. doi:
10.1038/nature08015.
S. J. Bauer. Solar cycle variation of planetary exospheric temperatures. Na-
ture, 232:101 -- 102, August 1971.
J. L. Bean, E. M.-R. Kempton, and D. Homeier. A ground-based transmission
spectrum of the super-Earth exoplanet GJ 1214b. Nature, 468:669 -- 672,
December 2010. doi: 10.1038/nature09596.
A. Borysow. Collision-induced absorption coefficients of H2 pairs at temper-
atures from 60 K to 1000 K. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 390:779 -- 782,
August 2002. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020555.
S. C. Cary, I. R. McDonald, J. E. Barrett, and D. A. Cowan. On the rocks: the
microbiology of Antarctic Dry Valley soils. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 8:
129 -- 138, 2010.
L. T. Elkins-Tanton and S. Seager. Ranges of atmospheric mass and composi-
tion of super-Earth exoplanets. The Astrophysical Journal, 685:1237 -- 1246,
2008.
J. P. Ferris, P. C. Joshi, E. H. Edelson, and J. G. Lawless. HCN: A plausi-
ble source of purines, pyrimidines and amino acids on the primitive earth.
Journal of Molecular Evolution, 11:293 -- 311, 1978.
R. M. Goody and Y. L. Yung. Atmospheric radiation: Theoretical basis. 1989.
D. O. Gough. Solar interior structure and luminosity variations. Solar Physics,
74:21 -- 34, November 1981.
E. Hecht. Optics 4th edition. 2001.
J. F. Kasting. Earth's early atmosphere. Science, 259:920 -- 926, February 1993.
doi: 10.1126/science.259.5097.920.
J. F. Kasting, D. P. Whitmire, and R. T. Reynolds. Habitable Zones around
Main Sequence Stars. Icarus, 101:108 -- 128, January 1993. doi: 10.1006/icar.
1993.1010.
James W. Kirchner. The Gaia Hypothesis: Conjectures and Refutations. Cli-
matic Change, 58:21 -- 45, 2003. 10.1023/A:1023494111532.
H. A. Knutson, D. Charbonneau, L. E. Allen, J. J. Fortney, E. Agol, N. B.
Cowan, A. P. Showman, C. S. Cooper, and S. T. Megeath. A map of the day-
night contrast of the extrasolar planet HD 189733b. Nature, 447:183 -- 186,
May 2007.
J. Korenaga. On the Likelihood of Plate Tectonics on Super-Earths: Does Size
Matter? The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 725:L43 -- L46, December 2010.
doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/725/1/L43.
T. T. Koskinen, A. D. Aylward, and S. Miller. A stability limit for the atmo-
spheres of giant extrasolar planets. Nature, 450:845 -- 848, December 2007.
13
doi: 10.1038/nature06378.
H. Lammer, F. Selsis, I. Ribas, E. F. Guinan, S. J. Bauer, and W. W. Weiss.
Atmospheric Loss of Exoplanets Resulting from Stellar X-Ray and Extreme-
Ultraviolet Heating. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 598:L121 -- L124,
2003. doi: 10.1086/380815.
G. Laughlin and F. C. Adams. The frozen Earth: Binary scattering events
Icarus, 145:614 -- 627, June 2000. doi:
and the fate of the Solar System.
10.1006/icar.2000.6355.
David P. Lide, editor. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. CRC PRESS,
81 edition, 2000.
J. E. Lovelock and L. Margulis. Atmospheric homeostasis by and for the
biosphere: The Gaia hypothesis. Tellus, 26(1-2):2 -- 10, 1974. doi: 10.1111/j.
2153-3490.1974.tb01946.x.
J. I. Lunine. The atmospheres of Uranus and Neptune. Annual Review of
Astronomy and Astrophysics, 31:217 -- 263, 1993. doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.
31.090193.001245.
C. P. McKay, J. B. Pollack, and R. Courtin. The greenhouse and anti-
greenhouse effects on Titan. Science, 253:1118 -- 1121, September 1991. doi:
10.1126/science.253.5024.1118.
S. L. Miller. A Production of Amino Acids under Possible Primitive Earth
Conditions. Science, 117:528 -- 529, May 1953. doi: 10.1126/science.117.3046.
528.
J. I. Moses, C. Visscher, J. J. Fortney, A. P. Showman, N. K. Lewis, C. A.
Griffith, S. J. Klippenstein, M. Shabram, A. J. Friedson, M. S. Marley, and
R. S. Freedman. Disequilibrium Carbon, Oxygen, and Nitrogen Chemistry
in the Atmospheres of HD 189733b and HD 209458b. The Astrophysical
Journal, 737:15, 2011.
R. Pascal and L. Boiteau. Energy flows, metabolism and translation. Phil.
Trans. R. Soc., 366:2949, 2011.
R. Pierrehumbert and E. Gaidos. Hydrogen Greenhouse Planets Beyond the
Habitable Zone. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 734:L13, June 2011.
doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/734/1/L13.
R.T. Pierrehumbert. Principles of Planetary Climate. Cambridge Univer-
sity Press, 2011. ISBN 9780521865562. URL http://books.google.com/
books?id=bO_U8f5pVR8C.
M. W. Powner, B. Gerland, and J. D. Sutherland. Synthesis of activated
pyrimidine ribonucleotides in prebiotically plausible conditions. Nature,
459:239, May 2009.
R. R. Rafikov. Atmospheres of Protoplanetary Cores: Critical Mass for Nucle-
ated Instability. The Astrophysical Journal, 648:666 -- 682, September 2006.
doi: 10.1086/505695.
I. Ribas, E. F. Guinan, M. Gudel, and M. Audard. Evolution of the Solar
Activity over Time and Effects on Planetary Atmospheres. I. High-Energy
Irradiances (1-1700 A). The Astrophysical Journal, 622:680 -- 694, 2005.
L. S. Rothman, I. E. Gordon, A. Barbe, D. C. Benner, P. F. Bernath, M. Birk,
14
V. Boudon, L. R. Brown, A. Campargue, J.-P. Champion, K. Chance, L. H.
Coudert, V. Dana, V. M. Devi, S. Fally, J.-M. Flaud, R. R. Gamache,
A. Goldman, D. Jacquemart, I. Kleiner, N. Lacome, W. J. Lafferty, J.-Y.
Mandin, S. T. Massie, S. N. Mikhailenko, C. E. Miller, N. Moazzen-Ahmadi,
O. V. Naumenko, A. V. Nikitin, J. Orphal, V. I. Perevalov, A. Perrin,
A. Predoi-Cross, C. P. Rinsland, M. Rotger, M. Simeckov´a, M. A. H. Smith,
K. Sung, S. A. Tashkun, J. Tennyson, R. A. Toth, A. C. Vandaele, and
J. Vander Auwera. The HITRAN 2008 molecular spectroscopic database.
Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 110:533 -- 572,
2009. doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.02.013.
A. Segura, J. F. Kasting, V. Meadows, M. Cohen, J. Scalo, D. Crisp, R. A. H.
Butler, and G. Tinetti. Biosignatures from Earth-Like Planets Around M
Dwarfs. Astrobiology, 5:706 -- 725, December 2005. doi: 10.1089/ast.2005.5.
706.
F. Selsis, J. F. Kasting, B. Levrard, J. Paillet, I. Ribas, and X. Delfosse.
Habitable planets around the star Gliese 581? Astron. Astrophys., 476:
1373 -- 1387, December 2007.
C. Sotin, O. Grasset, and A. Mocquet. Mass radius curve for extrasolar Earth-
like planets and ocean planets. Icarus, 191:337 -- 351, November 2007.
D. J. Stevenson. Life-sustaining planets in interstellar space? Nature, 400:
32 -- +, July 1999. doi: 10.1038/21811.
Randy B. Stockbridge, Charles A. Lewis, Yang Yuan, and Richard Wolfenden.
Impact of temperature on the time required for the establishment of
primordial biochemistry, and for the evolution of enzymes. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(51):22102 -- 22105, 2010. doi:
10.1073/pnas.1013647107.
F. Tian, O. B. Toon, A. A. Pavlov, and H. De Sterck. A Hydrogen-Rich
Early Earth Atmosphere. Science, 308:1014 -- 1017, May 2005. doi: 10.1126/
science.1106983.
G. Tinetti, A. Vidal-Madjar, M.-C. Liang, J.-P. Beaulieu, Y. Yung, S. Carey,
R. J. Barber, J. Tennyson, I. Ribas, N. Allard, G. E. Ballester, D. K. Sing,
and F. Selsis. Water vapour in the atmosphere of a transiting extrasolar
planet. Nature, 448:169 -- 171, July 2007. doi: 10.1038/nature06002.
O. B. Toon, C. P. McKay, T. P. Ackerman, and K. Santhanam. Rapid calcula-
tion of radiative heating rates and photodissociation rates in inhomogeneous
multiple scattering atmospheres. JGR, 94:16287 -- 16301, November 1989.
D. Valencia, R. J. O'Connell, and D. D. Sasselov. Inevitability of Plate Tec-
tonics on Super-Earths. The Astrophysical Journal, 670:L45 -- L48, November
2007.
D. Valencia, R. J. O'Connell, and R. T. Pierrehumbert. Magma Ocean Life-
times. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, pages C1329+, 2008.
A. N. Volkov, R. E. Johnson, O. J. Tucker, and J. T. Erwin. Thermally
Driven Atmospheric Escape: Transition from Hydrodynamic to Jeans Es-
cape. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 729:L24, March 2011.
doi:
10.1088/2041-8205/729/2/L24.
15
K. von Braun, T. S. Boyajian, S. R. Kane, G. T. van Belle, D. R. Ciardi,
M. L´opez-Morales, H. A. McAlister, T. J. Henry, W.-C. Jao, A. R. Riedel,
J. P. Subasavage, G. Schaefer, T. A. ten Brummelaar, S. Ridgway, L. Stur-
mann, J. Sturmann, J. Mazingue, N. H. Turner, C. Farrington, P. J. Goldfin-
ger, and A. F. Boden. Astrophysical Parameters and Habitable Zone of the
Exoplanet Hosting Star GJ 581. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 729:
L26, March 2011. doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/729/2/L26.
J. C. G. Walker, P. B. Hays, and J. F. Kasting. A negative feedback
mechanism for the long-term stabilization of the earth's surface temper-
ature. Journal of Geophysical Research, 86:9776 -- 9782, October 1981. doi:
10.1029/JC086iC10p09776.
R. Wordsworth, F. Forget, and V. Eymet. Infrared collision-induced and far-
line absorption in dense CO2 atmospheres. Icarus, 210:992 -- 997, December
2010a. doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.06.010.
R. D. Wordsworth, F. Forget, F. Selsis, J.-B. Madeleine, E. Millour, and
V. Eymet.
Is Gliese 581d habitable? Some constraints from radiative-
convective climate modeling. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 522:A22+,
2010b. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015053.
Fig. 1. Example temperature profiles used in the climate calculations for pure H2 at-
mospheres (solid lines) compared with those for mixed H2-H2O atmospheres (dashed
lines).
16
10015020025030010−310−210−1100101 Fig. 2. Calculated effective OLR (Fout/σT 4
s ) as a function of total H2 pressure for
pure H2 (solid line) and mixed H2-H2O (dashed line) atmospheres. As can be seen,
significant differences between the two cases only occur below around pH2 = 0.5 bar.
The empirical fit to the pure H2 curve given by (1) is shown as a series of crosses
between 0.5 and 10 bar.
Fig. 3. Total amount of hydrogen lost due to XUV energy-limited / Jeans thermal
escape as a function of planet mass and orbital distance a) in a G-class system after
100 MYr and b) in an M-class system after 1 GYr. For reference, the dotted red
line shows the critical H+
3 cooling limit of Koskinen et al. [2007] for Jupiter-mass
planets under saturated XUV conditions.
17
a)11.522.533.54246810 Fig. 4. Duration of habitable conditions ∆thab as a function of planet mass and or-
bital distance for various starting atmospheric hydrogen inventories. a) and b) show
results for G- and M-class systems, respectively. Results are not plotted for situ-
ations where insufficient hydrogen is removed to allow surface temperatures lower
than Tmax = 333 K. The dashed blue line shows the outer edge of the CO2-warming
habitable zone for the given stellar luminosity, while in a) the thin solid lines show
the orbits of Earth and Mars. The black region shows cases for which the atmo-
sphere is eroded just the right amount to allow permanent surface temperatures in
the 273 to 333 K range.
18
Fig. 5. Total amount of hydrogen lost due to atmospheric Jeans escape only after
10 GYr as a function of planet mass, for planets with constant exospheric tempera-
tures. For these relatively low values of Texo, efficient hydrogen dissociation was no
longer assumed, and the Jeans flux (5) was calculated using the collision cross-sec-
tion for molecular hydrogen σH2 = π(1.2 × 10−10)2 m2, to give a simple lower limit
on the total escape.
19
|
1803.08564 | 2 | 1803 | 2018-03-26T19:42:57 | The WFIRST Exoplanet Microlensing Survey | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) was the top ranked large space mission in the 2010 New Worlds, New Horizons decadal survey, and it was formed by merging the science programs of 3 different mission concepts, including the Microlensing Planet Finder (MPF) concept (Bennett \etal\ 2010). The WFIRST science program (Spergel \etal\ 2015) consists of a general observer program, a wavefront controlled technology program, and two targeted science programs: a program to study dark energy, and a statistical census of exoplanets with a microlensing survey, which uses nearly one quarter of WFIRST's observing time in the current design reference mission. The New Worlds, New Horizons (decadal survey) midterm assessment summarizes the science case for the WFIRST exoplanet microlensing survey with this statement: "WFIRST's microlensing census of planets beyond 1 AU will perfectly complement Kepler's census of compact systems, and WFIRST will also be able to detect free-floating planets unbound from their parent stars\rlap." | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | The WFIRST Exoplanet Microlensing Survey
David P. Bennett1 (301-286-5473, [email protected]),
Rachel Akeson2, Jay Anderson3, Lee Armus2, Etienne Bachelet4, Vanessa Bailey5, Thomas
Barclay1, Richard Barry1, Jean-Phillipe Beaulieu6, Andrea Bellini3, Dominic J. Benford7,
Aparna Bhattacharya1, Padi Boyd1, Valerio Bozza8, Sebastiano Calchi Novati2, Kenneth
Carpenter1, Arnaud Cassan9, David Ciardi2, Andrew Cole6, Knicole Colon1, Christian
Coutures9, Martin Dominik10, Pascal Fouqu´e11 Kevin Grady1, Tyler Groff1, Calen
B. Henderson2, Keith Horne10, Christopher Gelino2, Dawn Gelino2, Jason Kalirai3, Stephen
Kane12, N. Jeremy Kasdin13, Jeffrey Kruk1, Seppo Laine2, Michiel Lambrechts14, Luigi
Mancini15, Avi Mandell1, Sangeeta Malhotra1, Shude Mao16, Michael McElwain1, Bertrand
Mennesson5, Tiffany Meshkat2, Leonidas Moustakas5, Jose A. Munoz17, David Nataf18,
Roberta Paladini2, Ilaria Pascucci19, Matthew Penny20, Radek Poleski20, Elisa Quintana1,
Cl´ement Ranc1, Nicholas Rattenbury21, James Rhodes1, Jason D. Rhodes5, Maxime Rizzo1,
Aki Roberge1, Leslie Rogers22, Kailash C. Sahu3, Joshua Schlieder1, Sara Seager23, Yossi
Shvartzvald5, R´emi Soummer3, David Spergel13, Keivan G. Stassun24, Rachel Street4,
Takahiro Sumi25, Daisuke Suzuki26, John Trauger5, Roeland van der Marel3, Benjamin F.
Williams27, Edward J. Wollack1, Jennifer Yee28, Atsunori Yonehara29, and Neil Zimmerman1
1NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
2IPAC/Caltech
3Space Telescope Science Institute
4Las Cumbres Observatory
5Jet Propulsion Laboratory
6University of Tasmania, Australia
7NASA Headquarters
8University of Salerno, Italy
9Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, France
10University of St.Andrews, Scotland, UK
11Canada France Hawaii Telescope Corp.
12University of California, Riverside
13Princeton University
14Lund University, Sweden
15University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy
16Tsinghua University, China
17University of Valencia, Spain
18Johns Hopkins University
19University of Arizona
20Ohio State University
21University of Auckland, New Zealand
22University of Chicago
23Massachusetts Institute of Technology
24Vanderbilt University
25Osaka University, Japan
26ISAS, JAXA, Japan
27University of Washington
28Harvard-Smithsonian CfA
29Kyoto Sangyo University, Japan
Submitted to the Committee on an Exoplanet Science Strategy
8
1
0
2
r
a
M
6
2
.
]
P
E
h
p
-
o
r
t
s
a
[
2
v
4
6
5
8
0
.
3
0
8
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
1
1. Scientific Rationale
The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) was the top ranked large space
mission in the 2010 New Worlds, New Horizons decadal survey, and it was formed by merging
the science programs of 3 different mission concepts, including the Microlensing Planet
Finder (MPF) concept (Bennett et al. 2010). The WFIRST science program (Spergel et al.
2015) consists of a general observer program, a wavefront controlled technology program,
and two targeted science programs: a program to study dark energy, and a statistical
census of exoplanets with a microlensing survey, which uses nearly one quarter of WFIRST's
observing time in the current design reference mission. The New Worlds, New Horizons
(decadal survey) midterm assessment summarizes the science case for the WFIRST exoplanet
microlensing survey with this statement: "WFIRST's microlensing census of planets beyond
1 AU will perfectly complement Kepler's census of compact systems, and WFIRST will also
be able to detect free-floating planets unbound from their parent stars."
Fig. 1.- Comparison of the WFIRST design sensitivity to that of Kepler in the planet mass-
semimajor axis plane (Penny et al., in preparation). The red line shows the approximate
50% completeness limit of Kepler (Burke et al. 2015). Blue shading shows the number of
WFIRST planet detections during the mission if there is one planet per star at a given mass
and semimajor axis. The thick blue line is the contour for 3 detections. Red dots show
Kepler candidate and confirmed planets, black dots show all other known planets. Blue dots
show a simulated realization of the planets detected by the WFIRST microlensing survey,
assuming a fiducial planet mass function. Solar system bodies are shown by their images,
including the moons Ganymede, Titan, and The Moon at the semi-major axis of their hosts.
WFIRST is needed to detect low-mass planets at orbital separations ∼> 1 AU,
2
complementing Kepler's sensitivity to short period planets. Fig. 1 shows that WFIRST
is sensitive to planets in these orbits with masses two orders of magnitude smaller than what
is achievable with other methods. It indicates that WFIRST will be sensitive to analogs to
all the planets in our Solar System, except for Mercury, and its sensitivity reaches down to
very low mass planets as indicated by the light curve from a WFIRST simulation shown in
Fig. 2 (Penny et al. in preparation). Even very low mass planets can be detected with strong
signals. WFIRST is also sensitive to free-floating planets down to the mass of Mars that
have been ejected from the planetary systems of their birth, which should provide important
clues the processes of planet formation.
Fig. 2.- Example WFIRST lightcurve of
a 0.025M⊕ (2 lunar-mass) bound planet
detection. Black and red data points
are in the wide W149 and Z087 filters,
respectively. The blue curve shows the
underlying true lightcurve and the grey
line shows the best fit single lens light
curve.
The ultimate goal of NASA's exoplanet program is to search for signs of life on other
planets, but this requires an understanding of the planet formation process. Crucial details,
such as the delivery of water to Earth, are likely to depend on the details of the planet
formation process (Raymond et al. 2007). So, the presence of an Earth-size planet in the
habitable zone may not be a sufficient condition to allow life to develop. On the other hand,
our understanding of planetary habitability is currently rather primitive, so it could be that
planets very different from Earth could have conditions that are suitable for life (Seager
2013). Thus, gaining a better understanding of the basic properties of exoplanets and their
formation mechanisms is a critical part of NASA's search for life outside the Solar System.
It has proved to be quite challenging to develop a detailed understanding of planet formation
process, as it seems to involve a wide range of physical processes operating over a huge range
of length scales. It is fair to say that planet formation theory has yet to provide any detailed
predictions that have been confirmed, and that progress in the theoretical understanding of
planet formation must closely follow observational discoveries. Thus, WFIRST's exoplanet
microlensing survey is a crucial element of NASA's exoplanet program.
Ground-based microlensing is already playing a crucial role in our understanding of
planet populations. Suzuki et al. (2016) have found a break and likely peak in the exoplanet
mass ratio function at a mass ratio of q ∼ 10−4, and other ongoing surveys promise
substantially improved statistics. Fully characterizing the mass-ratio and mass functions
can only be done from space. Ground-based microlensing rapidly runs out of sensitivity to
3
21.621.82222.2150200250300350W149magnitudeM=2.02MMoona=5.20AUM⋆=0.29M⊙∆χ2=71021.5521.621.6521.721.750hr2468101214161820Time(days)W149Z087 Fig. 3.- Simulated color images of
a WFIRST microlensing survey field,
as observed by WFIRST in the IR
and a optical ground-based telescope.
Only the blue foreground disk stars
and bulge giants are resolvable in the
ground-based images on the right,
while the much more numerous main
sequence stars are resolved in the
WFIRST images.
planets below the observed break in the mass ratio function.
Signals from the smallest planets (mass ∼< 1M⊕) are largely washed out by finite-source
effects (Bennett & Rhie 1996), especially if they orbit inside the Einstein radius, which is
typically 2-3 AU. These effects are minimized for dwarf source stars, but the bulge main
sequence stars that comprise the vast majority of microlensing source stars are not resolved
in the ground-based images. This means that the ground-based photometry of these stars
is imprecise due to blending with other unresolved stars and that the microlensing signal is
diluted. WFIRST's vastly improved resolution (Fig. 3) will resolve these issues.
This improved resolution will also enable the characterization of the host stars by
allowing direct measurements of their flux and the vector lens-source relative proper
motion, µrel (Bennett et al. 2006, 2015) WFIRST will also combine relative proper motion
measurements with partial microlensing parallax measurements to measure masses more
directly (Gould 2014). Combining the mass-distance relationships from microlens parallax
and flux measurements also determines the mass of the lens (Yee 2015). Measurements of
µrel also ensure the the measured light can be correctly identified with the exoplanet host
star (Bhattacharya et al. 2017; Koshimoto et al. 2017).
Fig. 4 shows HST images that reveal the lens (and planet host) star separating from the
source star at the predicted µrel value for planetary microlensing event OGLE-2005-BLG-
169. High angular resolution follow-up observations from space or narrow field adaptive
optics systems are needed to measure such effects for events found from the ground, but
WFIRST will measure such effects directly. With ∼ 40, 000 images per star, WFIRST will
have the S/N to measure lens-source separations much smaller than seen in Fig. 4.
2. Developments Since the Decadal Survey
The WFIRST mission has undergone some changes since the Decadal Survey. The main
change has been the move from a 1.3-1.5m telescope to a 2.4m aperture telescope that was
gifted to NASA from another government agency. This has opened up some opportunities
for WFIRST. It has enabled a technology demonstration wavefront controlled coronagraph
to be added to WFIRST, and it allows the dark energy studies to go much deeper in contrast
to ESA's Euclid mission. The improvements for the exoplanet microlensing survey have been
4
Fig. 4.- Stacked, dithered HST/WFC3 images of the OGLE-2005-BLG-169 source and lens
star, separated by 50 mas in images taken 6.5 years after the microlensing event. The fit to
microlensing light curve constraints and mass-magnitude relations yields the masses of the
host (or lens) star and its planet of ML = 0.69 ± 0.02M(cid:12) and mp = 14.1 ± 0.9M⊕ (Bennett
et al. 2015).
more modest, because the smaller field-of-view and larger slew times than previous designs
counteract some of the gains in photometric precision. However, the significant improvement
in angular resolution adds a great deal of margin to the lens-source relative proper motion
(µrel) measurements that are part of the primary WFIRST mass measurement method,
illustrated in Fig. 4.
3. Simultaneous Ground-based Surveys
The primary WFIRST exoplanet host star and planet mass measurement method
involves measuring the brightness and relative proper motion of the host star, so this
method does not apply to planets without a host star. The same is true for planets hosted
by brown dwarfs or white dwarfs. Fortunately, for events caused by low-mass free-floating
or bound planets, there is a method that can determine the lens masses for events that
can be observed from the ground. This method uses finite source effects (which yield the
angular Einstein radius, θE) combined with a measurement of the microlensing parallax
effect (as seen in Fig. 5) between Earth and WFIRST's L2 orbit. This combination yields
the lens mass (Yee 2013), and this is the only method to determine the masses of free-
floating planets. This method is only expected to yield mass measurements for a fraction of
free-floating planets, but this will be important, since it will be our only method to check if
our statistical methods to estimate the mass distribution of free-floating planets might be
subject to systematic errors due uncertainties in their spatial or velocity distribution.
These parallax observations can only be obtained through simultaneous observations
of free-floating planets from the ground and WFIRST, because the WFIRST data are not
transmitted to the Earth in time for prompt alerts to observe with follow-up telescopes.
There are several planned or existing ground-based telescopes that could be used for such
a ground-based survey, and they would mostly make microlensing parallax measurements
of different events. So, it would be beneficial have several of these simultaneous ground-
based surveys. The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) is one option that could detect
5
-3048126204282360438516594672750-3048126204282360438516594672750F814W
Lens
Source
-3048126204282360438516594672750F555W
Lens
Source
5.- Simulated light curve of a
Fig.
free-floating planet of 10M⊕ observed
simultaneously by WFIRST and LSST.
The shift in the time of peak magnification
between the two light curves is due to
the microlensing parallax effect. When
combined with the source radius crossing
time,
that is also measured from
this light curve, the microlensing parallax
measurement will yield the host star mass.
t∗,
relatively faint events (Marshall et al. 2017). The Japanese-American-South African PRIME
infrared telescope that is now being developed for deployment in South Africa for WFIRST
precursor observations (Bennett et al. 2018) would cover a different longitude and would be
less affected by high extinction. Another attractive option would be the Korean Microlensing
Telescope Network (KMTNet) (Kim et al. 2016) with telescopes on 3 Southern continents.
A simultaneous WFIRST-KMTNet survey might serve as a possible Korean contribution to
join the WFIRST Project.
4. Conclusion
The WFIRST exoplanet microlensing survey is the unique program that can extend
the Kepler census of short period planets to the cooler, long period planets, like seven of
the eight planets in our own Solar System. It will provide fundamental information on the
properties of exoplanet systems that will be crucial for understanding planet formation and
ultimately the search for life outside the Solar System.
References
Bennett, D.P. & Rhie, S. 1996, ApJ, 472, 660
Bennett, D.P., et al. 2006, ApJL, 647, L171
Bennett, D.P., et al. 2010, arXiv:1012.4486
Bennett, D.P., et al. 2015, ApJ, 808, 169
Bennett, D.P., et al. 2018, SAG-11 Report
update to CESS
Bhattacharya, A., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 59
Burke, C.J., et al. 2015, ApJ, 809, 8
Calchi Novati, S., et al. 2018, AJ, submitted
(arXiv:1801.10586)
Gould, A., 2014, KAS, 47, 215
Kim, S.-L., et al., 2016, JKAS, 49, 37
Koshimoto, N., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 3
Marshall, P., et al. 2017, arXiv:1708.04058
Raymond, S. N., Quinn, T., & Lunine, J. I.
2007, Astrobiology, 7, 66
Seager, S., 2013, Science, 340, 577
Spergel, D. et al. 2015, arXiv.org:1503.03757
Yee, J.C., 2013, ApJL, 770, L31
Yee, J.C., 2015, ApJL, 814, L11
Yee, J.C., et al. 2018, CESS white paper
6
MagnificationTimesinceUT00:00April192025(days)10-M⊕FFPπE=16.1is=20.9WFIRST-W149WFIRST-Z087LSST-zLSST-iLSST-rLSST-g0246810120.20.40.6 |
1802.09379 | 2 | 1802 | 2018-06-05T13:33:39 | Mapping of Jupiter's tropospheric NH$_3$ abundance using ground-based IRTF/TEXES observations at 5 $\mu$m | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | We report on results of an observing campaign to support the Juno mission. At the beginning of 2016, using TEXES (Texas Echelon cross-dispersed Echelle Spectrograph), mounted on the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF), we obtained data cubes of Jupiter in the 1930--1943 cm$^{-1}$ spectral ranges (around 5 $\mu$m), which probe the atmosphere in the 1--4 bar region, with a spectral resolution of $\approx$ 0.15 cm$^{-1}$ and an angular resolution of $\approx$ 1.4". This dataset is analysed by a code that combines a line-by-line radiative transfer model with a non-linear optimal estimation inversion method. The inversion retrieves the vertical abundance profiles of NH$_3$ - which is the main contributor at these wavelengths - with a maximum sensitivity at $\approx$ 1--3 bar, as well as the cloud transmittance. This retrieval is performed on over more than one thousand pixels of our data cubes, producing maps of the disk, where all the major belts are visible. We present our retrieved NH$_3$ abundance maps which can be compared with the distribution observed by Juno's MWR (Bolton et al., 2017; Li et al., 2017) in the 2 bar region and discuss their significance for the understanding of Jupiter's atmospheric dynamics. We are able to show important latitudinal variations - such as in the North Equatorial Belt (NEB), where the NH$_3$ abundance is observed to drop down to 60 ppmv at 2 bar - as well as longitudinal variability. In the zones, we find the NH$_3$ abundance to increase with depth, from 100 $\pm$ 15 ppmv at 1 bar to 500 $\pm$ 30 ppmv at 3 bar. We also display the cloud transmittance--NH$_3$ abundance relationship, and find different behaviour for the NEB, the other belts and the zones. Using a simple cloud model, we are able to fit this relationship, at least in the NEB, including either NH$_3$-ice or NH$_4$SH particles with sizes between 10 and 100 $\mu$m. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | Mapping of Jupiter's tropospheric NH3 abundance using ground-based
IRTF/TEXES observations at 5 µm
Doriann Blaina,∗, Thierry Foucheta, Thomas Greathouseb, Th´er`ese Encrenaza, Benjamin Charnaya, Bruno B´ezarda,
Cheng Lic, Emmanuel Lelloucha, Glenn Ortonc, Leigh N. Fletcherd, Pierre Drossarta
aLESIA, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, Sorbonne Universit´e, Univ. Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cit´e, 92195,
cJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
dDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
bSwRI, Div. 15, San Antonio, TX 78228, USA
Meudon, France
Abstract
We report on results of an observing campaign to support the Juno mission. At the beginning of 2016, using TEXES
(Texas Echelon cross-dispersed Echelle Spectrograph), mounted on the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF), we
obtained data cubes of Jupiter in the 1930 -- 1943 cm−1 spectral ranges (around 5 µm), which probe the atmosphere in the
1 -- 4 bar region, with a spectral resolution of ≈ 0.15 cm−1 and an angular resolution of ≈ 1.4". This dataset is analysed
by a code that combines a line-by-line radiative transfer model with a non-linear optimal estimation inversion method.
The inversion retrieves the vertical abundance profiles of NH3 -- which is the main contributor at these wavelengths --
with a maximum sensitivity at ≈ 1 -- 3 bar, as well as the cloud transmittance. This retrieval is performed on more than
one thousand pixels of our data cubes, producing maps of the disk, where all the major belts are visible. We present our
retrieved NH3 abundance maps which can be compared with the distribution observed by Juno's MWR (Bolton et al.,
2017; Li et al., 2017) in the 2 bar region and discuss their significance for the understanding of Jupiter's atmospheric
dynamics. We are able to show important latitudinal variations -- such as in the North Equatorial Belt (NEB), where
the NH3 abundance is observed to drop down to 60 ppmv at 2 bar -- as well as longitudinal variability. In the zones,
we find the NH3 abundance to increase with depth, from 100 ± 15 ppmv at 1 bar to 500 ± 30 ppmv at 3 bar. We also
display the cloud transmittance -- NH3 abundance relationship, and find different behaviour for the NEB, the other belts
and the zones. Using a simple cloud model (Lacis and Hansen, 1974; Ackerman and Marley, 2001), we are able to fit
this relationship, at least in the NEB, including either NH3-ice or NH4SH particles with sizes between 10 and 100 µm.
1. Introduction
Ammonia (NH3) is an important molecule for the un-
derstanding of Jupiter's atmosphere.
Indeed, the most
commonly accepted models of Jupiter's atmosphere, such
as from Atreya et al. (1999) show that the condensation
of NH3 plays a major role in the presumed cloud structure
of Jupiter. It is assumed to react with hydrogen sulfide
(H2S) to form an ammonium hydrosulfide (NH4SH) cloud
at around 2 bar, and to condense to form a NH3-ice cloud
at about 0.8 bar.
Observations made at radio wavelengths by de Pater
(1986); de Pater et al. (2016) for example, are consistent
with this model. The NH3 abundance profile is found to
sharply decrease above the 0.6-bar and 2-bar pressure lev-
els -- with variations between the North Equatorial Belt
(NEB) and the Equatorial Zone (EZ) -- , where the hypo-
thetical clouds are predicted to lie, while the abundance
remains constant below the 2-bar pressure level. In con-
Figure 1: Reconstitution of the apparent disk of Jupiter the 16 Jan-
uary 2016, 11:10 UT. Orthographic projection of a mosaic of pic-
tures taken by Einaga (2016) between 15 and 16 January 2016 UT
with a 300 mm Newton telescope from Kasai-City, Hyogo-Prefecture,
Japan.
∗Corresponding author.
Email address: [email protected] (Doriann Blain)
trast to these observations and theory, the Galileo atmo-
spheric probe measurements of the NH3 volume mixing ra-
Preprint submitted to Elsevier
August 27, 2018
8
1
0
2
n
u
J
5
.
]
P
E
h
p
-
o
r
t
s
a
[
2
v
9
7
3
9
0
.
2
0
8
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
tio (VMR) showed NH3 to increase down to 8 bar (Folkner
et al., 1998; Sromovsky et al., 1998). However, the probe
entered a specific region called a hotspot -- a small, bright
region at 5 µm -- , and several remote sensing measure-
ments (Fouchet et al., 2000; de Pater et al., 2001; B´ezard
et al., 2002; Bjoraker et al., 2015; Fletcher et al., 2016)
have demonstrated that hotspots are not representative of
the whole atmosphere.
More recently, the first published results of the Juno
Microwave Radiometer (MWR) (Bolton et al., 2017; Li
et al., 2017) undeniably show that the distribution of NH3
below the 1-bar pressure level is much more complex than
previously thought, with strong variations observed both
with altitude and with latitude -- though this complex-
ity was previously observed above the 1-bar pressure level
from 10-µm observations (Achterberg et al., 2006; Fletcher
et al., 2016). Most strikingly, MWR profiles display a
minimum with altitude at about 7 bar everywhere on the
planet except in the EZ. In addition, Orton et al. (2017)
have highlighted a potential inconsistency at some lati-
tudes between JIRAM radiance at 5 µm and MWR bright-
ness temperature that has yet to be understood. Moreover,
MWR currently published results may not be representa-
tive of the whole planet. Indeed, MWR channels have a
full width half maximum (FWHM) footprint from 2◦ at
the equator to 20◦ near the poles, so even if MWR data
cover latitudes pole to pole, only a narrow longitude range
is explored during each perijove pass.
Ammonia could also play a role in the visible-light ap-
pearance of Jupiter, itself correlated with the vertical and
horizontal winds in the troposphere. The NH3-ice clouds
could be responsible for the white color of Jupiter's zones
in the visible, and are associated with intense vertical up-
drafts bringing NH3 to high altitudes (Owen and Terrile,
1981). However, this relation between NH3 and the visi-
ble brightness of Jupiter has been tempered by the work of
Giles et al. (2015), which showed that pure NH3-ice clouds
are not consistent with Cassini VIMS 5-µm data. These
results are in agreement with Baines et al. (2002) observa-
tions using the Galileo Near-Infrared Mapping Spectrom-
eter (NIMS), which showed that pure NH3-ice clouds have
bee identified on less than 1% of the area observed in the
study. In the same work, to explain this discrepancy be-
tween the observations and thermodynamic predictions,
it was suggested that NH3-ice material might be altered
either by photochemistry or coated by another material.
The brown color of the belts may be due to a deeper
cloud deck possibly containing a sulfide, like NH4SH, as
evoked by Owen and Terrile (1981). The color of the Great
Red Spot (GRS), might be due to NH3 photodissociation
byproducts reacting with acetylene (C2H2) at high alti-
tude (Carlson et al., 2016), or irradiation of NH4SH par-
ticle (Loeffler and Hudson, 2018). In all cases, NH3 seems
to play a role in the cloud formation -- and therefore, the
colors in visible-light -- of Jupiter. Joint cloud opacity
and NH3 gas abundance measurement could therefore be
useful to assess the importance of this role.
2
Figure 2: Map of the mean observed radiance for the reduced spectral
cube in the 1930 -- 1943 cm−1 wavenumber range taken the 16 January
2016 at 11h10 UTC. The Great Red Spot can be seen around pixel
[32, 70]. The longitudes are in system III and the latitudes are
planetocentric.
In this work, we use high-resolution spectral cubes, de-
scribed in section 2, covering most of Jupiter's disk to
simultaneously retrieve the abundance of NH3 in the tro-
posphere and the cloud transmittance.
In section 3 we
present our methodology, and our results are described
and discussed in section 4. We display a map of the NH3
abundance in the troposphere, covering a wide range of
longitudes and latitudes. We aim to both offer a com-
plementary view of MWR data and try to spot localised
features that may be missed by MWR due to its narrow
longitudinal coverage.
2. Observations and data reduction
2.1. Observations
2.1.1. IRTF
We used three spectral cubes of Jupiter obtained on 16
January 2016 (UT) using Texas Echelon X-Echelle Spec-
trograph (TEXES, see Lacy et al., 2002) mounted on the
InfraRed Telescope Facility (IRTF) at Mauna Kea, Hawaii.
The data were acquired with the medium-resolution 1.4"×45"
slit with the long axis aligned along celestial N/S. A visual
approximation of the appearance of Jupiter at this date is
shown in figure 1.
The slit was offset from Jupiter's center by 25" west
and stepped by 0.7" increments east until the slit fell off
the planet on the eastern limb. Sky observations taken at
the beginning and end of the scan were used to subtract
the sky emission throughout the scan. The observations
were flat fielded and flux calibrated using observations of
a blackbody card placed in front of the instrument win-
dow at the beginning of the observations following the
black-sky method described in Lacy et al. (2002). This
0102030405060x px020406080y px-75°-70°-65°-60°-55°-50°-45°-40°-35°-30°-25°-20°-15°-10°-5°0°5°10°15°20°25°30°35°40°45°50°55°60°65°70°75°180°210°240°270°300°0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.5Mean radiance (W m−2⋅sr−1/cm−1)×10−4 Figure 3: Planetocentric Mollweide projection of Jupiter in visible light. Longitudes are in system III. The mosaic was built from several
pictures taken by Einaga (2016) between 15 and 16 January 2016 using a 300 mm Newton telescope.
Figure 4: Planetocentric Mollweide projection of the observed radiance of all our reduced IRTF/TEXES spectral cubes in the 1930 -- 1943
cm−1 wavenumber range. Longitudes are in system III. The Great Red Spot is located between latitudes 15 -- 25◦S and longitudes 230 -- 250◦W.
3
85°S80°S75°S70°S65°S60°S55°S50°S45°S40°S35°S30°S25°S20°S15°S10°S5°S0°5°N10°N15°N20°N25°N30°N35°N40°N45°N50°N55°N60°N65°N70°N75°N80°N85°N360.0° W330.0° W300.0° W270.0° W240.0° W210.0° W180.0° W150.0° W120.0° W90.0° W60.0° W30.0° W85°S80°S75°S70°S65°S60°S55°S50°S45°S40°S35°S30°S25°S20°S15°S10°S5°S0°5°N10°N15°N20°N25°N30°N35°N40°N45°N50°N55°N60°N65°N70°N75°N80°N85°N360.0° W330.0° W300.0° W270.0° W240.0° W210.0° W180.0° W150.0° W120.0° W90.0° W60.0° W30.0° W0.00.40.81.21.62.02.42.83.2Mean radiance (W.m−2).sr−1/cm−1)×10−4 Table 1: Reduced spectral cubes parameters, recorded on 16 January 2016
Wavenumber range Main
feature
(cm−1)
1930 -- 1943
NH3
Observing time
(UT)
09h36
11h10
12h50
Size
(px)
61 × 95
61 × 95
59 × 96
Longitude converage
(sys. III ◦W)
Number of
retrieved spectra
(1)
cH2O
(mm)
83 -- 264
153 -- 296
213 -- 358
4489
4472
4511
1.5
2.0
2.5
(1) Line-of-sight column density in the Earth's atmosphere. See section 3.2.
Table 2: Molecular parameters and references
Molecule
VMR
Line parameters
(ν, intensity and Elow)
Broadening
parameters
0.863(1)
0.135(1)
1.81×10−3
--
--
GEISA 2015
GEISA 2015
GEISA 2015
--
--
H2
He
CH4
H2O
NH3
(1) From von Zahn et al. (1998).
(2) Vertical profile taken from cited article.
(3) Pressure broadening at half width half maximum multiplied by 0.79 according to Langlois
Roos-Serote et al. (1998)(2)
Sromovsky et al. (1998)(4)
GEISA 2015
GEISA 2015(3)
Brown and Peterson (1994)
et al. (1994).
(4) We took the a priori of the vertical profile used in the article for all pressures lower than
0.8 bar. For greater pressures, we modified the value in some of our configurations (see
section 3.3).
reduction is performed within the TEXES pipeline soft-
ware along with wavelength calibration by using telluric
lines within the bandpass observed and distortion correc-
tions for all the optical effects within the spectrograph to
return a fully reduced flux-calibrated 3-dimensional data
cube, 2-d spatial and 1-d spectral. Then, the latitude and
longitude of each pixel are determined. This is discussed
in section 2.2.
The spectral cubes were transposed to make them look
like the disk as observed from Earth, as shown for example
in Figure 2. They cover the planet's disk in roughly 65×95
pixels (depending on the cube), with a pixel-projected an-
gular resolution of ≈0.7" (the length of the scan steps)
along the x axis and ≈0.34" along the y axis (close to the
diffraction limit of the telescope), with a spectral resolu-
tion of ≈0.15 cm−1 in the 1930 -- 1943 cm−1 spectral range.
This range permits us to probe the atmosphere in the 1 -- 3
bar region via the strong NH3 line at 1939 cm−1, as shown
later.
The noise of the observed radiance at each wavenumber
was taken as the mean of the standard deviation of the
radiance of the off-disk pixels in the four 5×5 pixels squares
at each corner of the spectral cubes. This gives us a mean
S/N ratio per spectral pixel of ≈10, with a maximum of
≈35. More details about the spectral cubes can be found
in Table 1.
It should be noted that there is known radiance cali-
bration problems with TEXES, as highlighted by Fletcher
et al. (2016) and Melin et al. (2017). This may affect the
absolute values, essentially of the cloud transmittance, but
not the relative spatial variations that we observe.
2.1.2. Visible light
In order to compare our infrared observations with
the visible aspect of Jupiter, we took a cylindrical map
of Jupiter made by Einaga (2016) from a mosaic of pic-
tures taken between 15 and 16 January 2016 with a 300
mm Newton telescope and transformed it using Molleweide
and orthographic projections. The results are displayed in
figures 1 and 3.
2.2. Latitudes and longitudes
After the pipeline processing, the data are pushed through
a purpose-built IDL program where the user visibly matches
the limb of the planet to an ellipse to locate the center of
the planet. Then using NAIF's ICY toolkit (Acton, 1996)
the program calculates the latitude and longitude of each
pixel of the map in Jovian west longitude and planetocen-
tric latitude.
One of the main challenges of using this method is that,
with TEXES in the spectral range of our observations, the
limbs are not well-defined. It is therefore hard to correctly
place the ellipse. A few arc-seconds error on the placement
of the center of the ellipse -- resulting on a few degrees
error on latitudes and longitudes at the center of the disk
-- or the size of the ellipse can result in errors reaching
4
more than 10◦ on latitude and longitude near the limbs.
This makes quantitative spatial comparisons between our
work and others difficult. Hence, when spatially compar-
ing our results with other works we favour a qualitative
discussion.
2.3. Doppler shift
We corrected the Doppler shift of the observed spectra
using a velocity map produced by the IDL mapping code,
which takes into account the relative velocity of Jupiter
with respect to Earth as well as Jupiter's rotation, so that
each spectrum has its own Doppler-shift correction. To
take this into account when adding the effect of the sky to
the synthetic spectra (see section 3.2), the sky is accord-
ingly shifted in wavenumber. For information, the Doppler
shift had a mean value of +0.17 cm−1.
3. Methods
3.1. Radiative transfer
The radiative transfer we use includes H2 -- H2 and H2 --
He absorption, rovibrational bands from CH4, H2O and
NH3, as well as cloud-induced absorption, reflection and
emission. The H2 -- H2 and H2 -- He absorption were given by
a subroutine originally written by A. Borysow and based
on models by Borysow et al. (1985, 1988). The volume
mixing ratios (VMR), line parameters (i.e. position, in-
tensity and energy of the lower transition level), tempera-
ture and broadening coefficients references used for mod-
elling these different gases are listed in Table 2. We used
linewidths broadened by H2 and He and their respective
temperature dependence whenever available. For the line
shape, we used a Voigt profile with a cut-off at 35 cm−1
for all the molecules.
Our initial a priori temperature profile comes from the
measurement of the Galileo probe (Seiff et al., 1998). Our
model atmosphere is divided up in 126 atmospheric layers
from 10−7 to 20 bar, evenly distributed logarithmically.
Our model includes one monolayer grey (i.e. spectrally
constant) cloud located at 0.8 bar, with a lambertian re-
flectance (I/F ) always equal to 0.15. This cloud is repre-
sented in our code by a scalar fixed to 1 above the cloud
level and the cloud transmittance tc at and below the
cloud level. This cloud model is inspired from the work
of Giles et al. (2015, 2017), who showed that the tropo-
spheric cloud layer can be located between 1.2 and 0.8 bar,
and that more refined cloud structures, as described by
Atreya et al. (1999) for example (three multilayer clouds
with a smooth transmittance gradient), have only a minor
effect on the goodness of fit. For the spectral directional
reflectance, we used the value retrieved by Drossart et al.
(1998), based on a comparison between 5-µm low-flux day-
side and nightside spectra of Jupiter. However, we do not
include multiple-diffusion or a deep cloud layer at 5 bar.
These parameters play an important role only inside the
zones (see Giles et al., 2015, for example), but in our data,
the mean signal-to-noise ratio of these regions is system-
atically lower than 6, which is not high enough to retrieve
valuable information. Therefore, our approach ignoring
these parameters should have only a minor impact on our
results.
The radiance is convolved to simulate the instrument
function, which was approximated as a gaussian with a
FWHM of 0.15 cm−1.
Further details concerning the radiative transfer equa-
tions used can be found in the appendix.
3.2. Transmission of the Earth's atmosphere
To model the effect of Earth's atmospheric transmit-
tance ("sky"), we used the code LBLRTM (Clough et al.,
2005) using a U.S. standard atmosphere and zenith an-
gles and integrated column for telluric H2O adjusted to
reproduce the conditions of observation for each spectral
cube. Then, we multiplied our synthetic spectra and our
retrieval derivatives (see section 3.3) by the synthetic sky
transmittances. In contrast with methods adopted by pre-
vious authors, where the observed radiance is divided by
the sky transmittances (i.e. B´ezard et al., 2002), there is
no need to remove some spectral ranges where the sky ab-
sorption is above an arbitrary limit. Concomitantly, the
retrieval process is less sensitive to the radiances at the
wavenumbers where the sky absorption is high.
We determined the zenith angles using the position and
altitude of the telescope and the position of Jupiter in the
sky at the date of observation coupled with ephemerides.
The value of the telluric H2O column was derived, for
each cube, using the jovian spectra with highest signal.
We obtained the best fit with the synthetic spectrum gen-
erated with the line of sight column for telluric H2O dis-
played in Table 1.
3.3. Retrieval method
We used a classical optimal non-linear retrieval method
(Rodgers, 2000) to retrieve the abundance of the main
molecular contributors at each atmospheric layer, as well
as the cloud transmittance, while the abundance profiles
of minor species as well as the temperature profile were
kept constant.
This retrieval method can be described as follows. We
can take the full state vector x containing k independent
components, x1, ..., xk, representing in our case the abun-
dance profiles and the cloud transmittance profile. It can
be demonstrated (Rodgers, 2000, Eq. 4.29) that the best
estimator xj of a component xj of x can be written as
xj = xaj + SajK T
j
KiSaiK T
i + S
∆y
(1)
i=1
With xaj the a priori estimate of xj (i.e.
the a priori
abundance profiles, listed in Table 2, and the cloud trans-
mittance profile), Sa the covariance matrix for the a priori
5
(cid:32)i=k(cid:88)
(cid:33)−1
weighted sum of squared deviations per degrees of freedom
(reduced χ2) function. (iii) we use our retrieval method
described in Eq. (1), this gives us our new profiles x. (iv)
we update our a priori profiles with our new profiles, so
that xa = x. These four steps constitute one iteration.
While the goodness of fit calculated in step 2 is improved
by more than a threshold δ, we continue to iterate, until
the condition is fulfilled. For our runs, we choose a δ of
1%. Typically, it takes about 10 iterations before the χ2
improvement drops below this threshold. We also limited
the maximum number of iterations to 32 to speed up our
retrievals. Increasing the maximum number of iterations
does not significantly change our results. This limit was
reached in less than 0.001% of the retrievals, and concerned
mostly pixels with high cloud transmittance (> 0.129). In
the worst case, the χ2 was improved by 1% during the last
iteration. We consider that, given the low improvement of
the goodness of fit at the last iteration and the very lim-
ited number of spectra concerned, this limit in iteration
number had no significant effect on our results.
To prevent the retrieval of being trapped within a χ2
local minima, we chose to make a first run retrieving only
the cloud transmittance, while leaving the mixing ratios of
the gases constant. In this case, we used a weight w = 0.5
to ensure a fast convergence. This permitted us to have an
a priori value on the cloud transmittance for our second
run very close to the solution value. In the second run,
we retrieved all the abundance profiles as well as the cloud
transmittance. It is this last run that gives us the spectra,
profiles and maps that will be discussed in the following
sections.
Clouds play a crucial role in our retrieval method. Be-
cause of the way clouds are taken into account (see the
appendix) they can change drastically the sensitivity and
therefore the retrieved profiles of our species. Indeed, the
pressure level at which they are placed and the spectral
directional reflectance value are critical. For example, the
cloud-free maximum sensitivity at 5 µm of most of the
species we study in this work is around 4 bar. If we add a
cloud, the sensitivity at all the levels below the cloud level
decreases due to its transmittance, while the sensitivity at
and above the cloud level increases due to the solar re-
flected contribution. At some point, the level of maximum
of sensitivity at a given wavenumber will switch from be-
low the cloud level to above the cloud level. For NH3 the
effect is important even at a relatively high cloud trans-
mittance of 0.1. The result is that, taking into account the
effect of the smoothing matrix Sa, the maximum change
in the retrieved abundance profile will be situated at lower
pressure than in a cloud-free atmosphere, typically in the
1 -- 3 bar range instead of the 3 -- 4 bar expected.
For NH3, we tested four configurations (A, B, C and
D) in order to test the influence of the a priori and the
classical view of a profile constant below a given altitude.
(A) In the first configuration, we used the abundance pro-
file from Sromovsky et al. (1998), modified with a VMR of
200 ppmv for pressures greater than 0.8 bar, to represent
Figure 5: Weighting function matrix for NH3, with a cloud located
at 0.8 bar. The cloud transmittance is 0.14 and its reflectance is
0.15. Solid white line: pressure of maximum sensitivity as a function
of wavenumber.
parameters, which contains the uncertainties on each pa-
rameters, K the weighting functions of the parameters,
which contains the partial derivatives of the radiance with
respect to the parameter (an example is displayed in fig-
ure 5), S the measurement error diagonal covariance ma-
trix, which is described in section 2, and ∆y = y − ya
the difference between y, the observed radiance and ya,
the radiance calculated by our model using the a priori
parameters.
The unweighted covariance matrix Sa, common to all
the a priori parameters (xa1, ..., xak) is given by:
(cid:16)− log (px/py)2 /2v2(cid:17)
Sa,xy = exp
(2)
With, in our case, pz the pressure at the atmospheric level
z and v the vertical smoothing parameter, expressed in
scale height. It determines the degree of smoothing applied
to the solution. This matrix is then weighted by a factor
σj = w trace(S)/trace(Kj SaK T
j ), w being the weight of
the constraint on the departure from the a priori profile. In
this study, we adopted v = 0.75 and w = 0.1. These values
give us a fair goodness of fit and convergence speed, while
preventing the abundance profile to oscillate. Note that
for w, a wide range of values is possible (from 1 to 0.05),
most of the time without significant changes in the results.
If w is taken too low or too high, the results might vary
with the chosen a priori. Finally, the covariance matrix
Saj for the a priori parameter xaj is given by:
Saj = σj Sa
(3)
Our algorithm follows these steps: (i) we calculate the
radiance ya and its derivatives K, using our a priori pro-
files xa. (ii) we estimate the goodness of fit of the mod-
elled radiance ya on the observed radiance y through the
6
19321934193619381940Wavenumber (cm−1)100101Pressure (bar)−9.0−7.5−6.0−4.5−3.0−1.50.0∂Lth/∂lncNH3 (W⋅m−2⋅sr−1/cm−1)×10−6 the classical view on the abundance, but with a value at
≈ 10 bar close to what was found by Li et al. (2017) (B)
In the second configuration, the a priori VMR was set to
300 ppmv for pressures greater than 0.8 bar, which is the
value found by Sromovsky et al. (1998). (C) In the third
configuration, the a priori VMR was set to 400 ppmv for
pressures greater than 0.8 bar, to have an a priori similar
to the one used by Li et al. (2017). (D) In the fourth con-
figuration, we used the same a priori as in configuration
B, but instead of allowing the profile to freely vary at each
iteration, we impose that the profile must be constant at
pressures greater than 2 bars, and at pressures comprised
between 0.8 and 2 bars, taking as value the last retrieved
VMR at 2 bars. The formulae of KN H3 and Sa,N H3 are
changed accordingly. This latter configuration represents
a case where the NH3 VMR is constant until its conden-
sation at 0.8 bar. An example of a retrieval using these
profiles is discussed in section 4.3, the results are displayed
on figures 9 and 12.
In the 1930 -- 1943 cm−1 spectral range, only H2O -- and
to a lesser extent, CH4 and PH3 -- play a significant role
apart from NH3. In this spectral range H2O plays a role
similar to the cloud transmittance, and retrieving its abun-
dance profile following our methodology does not lead to
significant improvement. Hence, we chose to not retrieve
the H2O abundance profile. Since we also assume the CH4
VMR abundance profile to be constant, we chose to invert
only the abundance profile of NH3, while the abundance
profiles of the other molecules were kept constant.
3.4. Error handling
The uncertainties on the parameters obtained by the
retrieval method are given by the square root of the diag-
onal elements of the covariance matrix
Sj = Saj − GjKjSaj+ GjF
(4)
i + S
i KiSaiK T
With Gj = SajK T
the gain matrix
j
and F being 0 except on its diagonal where Fii = ∆yi
(meaning no correlation between wavenumber). The first
two terms represent the result of the sum of the smoothing
error and the retrieval noise error (i.e. the propagation of
the instrumental noise into the retrieved parameters). The
last term represents the forward model error, which is due
to the model imperfections. Note that the forward model
error must be evaluated with the true parameters, rather
than the retrieved parameters. However, at the end of all
the iterations, the retrieved parameters are expected to be
close to the true state, therefore the value used here should
be a good approximation of the true forward model error.
(cid:0)(cid:80)
(cid:1)−1
4. Results and discussion
4.1. Goodness of fit
To calculate the goodness of fit of our retrievals we
used the classical reduced RMS method (χ2/n, where n is
7
Table 3: Goodness of fit for each configuration for all the retrieved
spectra
Configuration NH3 a priori "deep"
abundance (ppmv)
name
A
B
C
D
200(1)
300(1)
400(1)
300(2)
χ2/n
σχ2/n
1.852
1.850
1.869
1.907
1.308
1.305
1.332
1.307
(1) For pressures greater than 0.7 bar.
(2) Same than (1) for the first iteration. For iteration
n: pressures greater than 1.8 bar and between 0.8
and 1.8 bar set to the abundance value at 1.8 bar
retrieved at iteration n − 1.
the number of free parameters, i.e. the number of samples
in a spectrum). We obtained very similar goodness of fit
for all our configurations, as shown in Table 3. Configu-
rations A, B and C allow the NH3 VMR profile to vary
freely, hence the VMR profiles retrieved with these config-
urations can be difficult to physically explain. In contrast,
the explanation for VMR profiles retrieved with configura-
tion is straightforward: there is no source of NH3 and the
gas condenses into NH3-ice clouds at 0.8 bar. More other,
the goodness of fit obtained with this configuration is com-
parable to those of the other configurations. Therefore, we
will discuss only the results derived from configuration D.
A map of these RMS can be seen in figure 6. For configu-
ration D, we obtained a mean χ2/n of 1.9 with a standard
deviation of 1.3, and values lower than 4 for 95% of the
retrieved spectra.
There is a large correlation between the mean radiance
and the goodness of fit, due to the better SNR in high-flux
spectra. A comparison between a synthetic spectrum and
an observed spectrum is displayed in figure 7.
These relatively high χ2/n values are primarily ex-
plained by the presence in the majority of our observations
of "spikes" and "dips" at roughly constant wavenumbers,
of varying intensities and shapes, that we were unable to
fit (there are some in figure 7 at ≈ 1933.6, 1934.9, 1937.0
or 1939.9 cm−1). We cannot definitively attribute those
features to a specific instrument artifact, since its seems
that the features follow Jupiter's band structure, but we
strongly favour this explanation, for the following reasons.
(i) In the spectra where these features seem insignificant,
we are able to obtain reasonably good fits (χ2/n ≈ 1).
(ii) Our model was tested and validated on a spectrum
of Jupiter in the same spectral range, already analysed in
B´ezard et al. (2002), so our model should not be the main
issue. (iii) These features do not correspond to lines of any
simple constituent, though some of them seem to be corre-
lated with the telluric absorption. (iv) Previous works on
TEXES in the same spectral range, such as Fletcher et al.
(2016) did not mention such issues.
Our uncertainties take into account the capacity of our
Figure 6: Planetocentric Mollweide projection of the goodness of fit of all our reduced spectral cube in the 1930 -- 1943 cm−1 wavenumber
range (configuration A). Longitudes are in system III.
Figure 7: Example of a fit on a relatively bright spectrum in the spectral cube taken at 11:10 UT situated at planetocentric latitude 8◦N and
System III longitude 215◦W (configuration D). The wavelengths are given in the reference frame of Jupiter. The residuals are shown below.
Dark blue: the observed spectrum, the errorbar represents the 1 sigma noise. Light blue: the convolved Earth's atmosphere transmittance,
with a Doppler shift of -0.13 cm−1. Green: our best fit, with a NH3 VMR of 125 ppmv at 2 bar. Black: our a priori, with a NH3 VMR of
300 ppmv at 2 bar. The NH3 lines are around 1939.0 and 1939.5 cm−1.
8
85°S80°S75°S70°S65°S60°S55°S50°S45°S40°S35°S30°S25°S20°S15°S10°S5°S0°5°N10°N15°N20°N25°N30°N35°N40°N45°N50°N55°N60°N65°N70°N75°N80°N85°N360.0° W330.0° W300.0° W270.0° W240.0° W210.0° W180.0° W150.0° W120.0° W90.0° W60.0° W30.0° W012345678910χ2/n0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.5Radiance (W⋅m−2⋅sr−1/cm−1)−10−40.00.20.40.60.8Sky transmittance19331934193519361937193819391940Wavenumber (cm−1)−1.0.0.50.00.51.0Difference (W⋅m−2⋅sr−1/cm−1)−10−41σ3σ5σwith a NH3 VMR of 300 ppmv at 2 bar (χ2/n = 9.47e+00)with a NH3 VMR of 125 ppmv at 2 bar (χ2/n = 2.70e+00) Figure 8: Planetocentric Mollweide projection of our retrieved 0.8-bar level cloud transmittance on all our reduced spectral cube in the
1930 -- 1943 cm−1 wavenumber range (configuration A). Longitudes are in system III.
model to fit the data, and the NH3 abundance of the re-
gions exempt of those features is consistent with the re-
gions where they are more intense, so we stay confident in
our results.
4.2. Cloud transmittance
It should be kept in mind that our methodology as-
sumes that the main modulator of flux is cloud transmit-
tance rather than absorption by gases. Therefore, it is
not surprising that our retrieved cloud transmittances are
strongly correlated with the mean radiance map. Once
again, the results are very similar among configuration A,
B, C and D, so we will discuss only configuration D.
It can be seen from figure 8 that the zones are very
cloudy, contrary to the belts. The northern belts are or-
ganised in patches of relatively cloud-free regions, which
correspond to dark, bluish regions south of the belts, at the
interface with the white zones -- the so called "hotspots".
It can also be seen that the globally thinnest cloud patches
are located in the North Equatorial Belt (NEB), with a
cloud transmittance greater than 0.2. The region at ≈
315◦W in the NEB is a good example. It should be noted
that the whitest regions of the northern belts in the visible
image (figure 3) often correspond to the regions with the
thickest clouds. This can be seen for example near 240◦W
in the NEB or near 210◦W in the North Temperate Belt
(NTB).
In the South Equatorial Belt (SEB), the Great Red
Spot (GRS), situated at longitude 240◦W, seems to per-
turb a line of thin clouds (in the visible (c.f. figure 3),
the dark brown line between 15 and 20◦S) from its east
side, so that the entire band west of the GRS is covered
by thick, light brown clouds that get more and more trans-
parent westward. This feature has been observed for ex-
ample by Giles et al. (2015) with 2001 Cassini's VIMS
spectral cubes. It can be explained by turbulence caused
by the GRS forming clouds. South-west of the GRS, there
is another line of thinner clouds at 20◦S, between 240 and
270◦W, which correspond to a dark bluish region in the
visible image. This region seems to circle around the GRS,
similarly to the dark line east of the GRS. Still in the SEB,
between longitude 120◦W and 150◦W, it seems that there
are two dark brown, transparency filaments, one at the
north and one at the south of the belt, separated by a thin
line of white, thicker clouds. The southern one reaches
the GRS, while the clouds of the northern one get thicker
approaching the GRS.
In the South Temperate Belt (STB), the distribution
seems to be simpler. The clouds get thinner at the center
of the belt, and thicker at its borders. The white ovals
that can be seen in the visible at latitude ≈ 40◦S do not
seem to have an infrared cloud counterpart, but it might be
because we do not have a high enough spatial resolution.
Quantitatively, these results are consistent with cloud
opacities at 5 µm retrieved in other works, such as B´ezard
9
85°S80°S75°S70°S65°S60°S55°S50°S45°S40°S35°S30°S25°S20°S15°S10°S5°S0°5°N10°N15°N20°N25°N30°N35°N40°N45°N50°N55°N60°N65°N70°N75°N80°N85°N360.0° W330.0° W300.0° W270.0° W240.0° W210.0° W180.0° W150.0° W120.0° W90.0° W60.0° W30.0° W0.0000.0250.0500.0750.1000.1250.1500.1750.2000.2250.250Cloud transmittance 4.3.1. Belts
An example of an abundance profile retrieved by each
configuration is displayed in figure 9. We used the same
spectrum as for figure 7. In this figure 9, we can see that we
obtain very similar results in the 1 -- 3 bar region -- where
our maximum of sensitivity lies -- with all our configu-
rations, while anywhere else the results are very a priori-
dependent and therefore not meaningful. Still in this fig-
ure, we also show the profiles retrieved using an a priori
close to that retrieved by MWR (Bolton et al., 2017) inside
of the NEB and an a priori with an abundance set to 50
ppmv below 0.6 bar. The solution profiles are close to the
other ones in the 1 -- 3 bar range and confirms that, outside
of this sensitivity region, no reliable information is avail-
able. We will therefore hereafter only show the retrievals
for configuration D (figures 10 and 11).
In figure 10, we removed all the points in the zones.
The mean uncertainty on the NH3 VMR at 2 bar, outside
of the zones, is ≈ 20%. In this figure we observe a large
depletion of NH3 in the middle of the NEB, with a volume
mixing ratio at 2 bar lower than 200 ppmv and going down
to 60 ppmv, between planetocentric latitudes ≈ 0 -- 17◦N,
over all our longitude coverage (system III 90 -- 360◦W).
This depletion seems to be less significant at longitudes
225 -- 240◦W, where thicker clouds are present.
The STB and the SEB are enriched compared to the
NEB (≈ 250 ppmv), and correspond to darker regions in
the visible. The NTB is similarly enriched, except between
270 -- 300◦W, where the NH3 abundance is lower than 200
ppmv. Globally, the southern belts seem to be have a
decreasing NH3 abundance southward -- from ≈ 250 ppmv
north of the belts to ≈ 200 ppmv south of the belts --
while it is the opposite for the NTB. In the SEB, the NH3
abundance seems to be lower around the GRS at 17◦S,
230◦W (≈ 200 ppmv), than in most of the belt (≈ 300
ppmv). A filament of depleted NH3 appears north of the
SEB east of longitude ≈ 150◦W, correlated to the filament
of thinner cloud observed in figure 8. westward of the GRS,
the NH3 abundance seems to decreases with longitude.
Poleward of latitudes ≈ 45◦N, there seems to be a de-
creasing NH3 abundance towards the Pole, starting at ≈
240 ppmv and going down to ≈ 160 ppmv. We have only a
few points poleward of latitude ≈ 50◦S, but the behaviour
seems to resemble what we observed in the northern hemi-
sphere.
Globally, the NH3 abundance shows little variation with
longitude in the temperate belts or near the poles, but the
smallest features, like the "ovals", may not be resolved. In
the SEB, the GRS seems to have a major influence, sep-
arating two very distinct behaviours we discussed earlier.
In the NEB, the latitudinal width of the depletion seems to
vary with longitude: 5◦ wide at longitudes 150◦W, 200◦W,
270◦W, almost disappearing at 235◦W, while nearly 10◦
wide in most of the belt. Strong longitudinal variations
should be observed by MWR in the equatorial belts as it
probes differents over different perijoves.
10
Figure 9: Retrieved NH3 abundance profiles for the spectral cube
taken at 11:10 UT situated at planetocentric latitude 8◦N and Sys-
tem III longitude 215◦W (see figure 7). Dotted black: configuration
A a priori abundance profile. Dashed black: configuration B and first
iteration of configuration D a priori abundance profile. Solid black:
configuration C a priori abundance profile. Yellow, orange, red and
green: retrieved abundance profile from respectively configuration
A, B, C and D. Purple: retrieved abundance profile using the dotted
grey a priori. Blue: retrieved abundance profile using the dashed
grey a priori, meant to be close to what was retrieved by MWR at
latitude 8◦N
.
et al. (2002), who found a transmittance of ≈ 0.45 inside
hotspots, or Irwin et al. (2001), who find transmittances
between ≈ 0.20 and 0.30 at 2 bar in bright regions of the
atmosphere.
It is also consistent with precise cloud re-
trievals, such as by Wong et al. (2004), who found that a
compact grey cloud of transmittance 0.14 is needed to fit
their observation in the NEB.
4.3. NH3
The Jupiter spectra we have can be separated into two
groups. One group is constituted of high-flux, high SNR
spectra, which gives a reasonably low relative uncertainty
on the retrieved NH3 abundance. The other group, in con-
trast, is constituted of low-flux, low-SNR spectra, which
gives a high uncertainty on the retrieved NH3 abundance.
One way to separate these groups is to use the retrieved
cloud transmittance. Indeed, the retrieved cloud transmit-
tance is highly correlated with the mean radiance -- and
therefore, the flux -- of the spectra, and is easy to ma-
nipulate. If we set a cloud transmittance threshold of 0.05
to separate the two groups, it appears that all the spectra
below this threshold have a low SNR (≈ 4 or less) and
are located exclusively in the zones. Hence, for now we
will refer as "zones" all the points with a retrieved cloud
transmittance lower than 0.05, and as "belts" all the other
points.
050100150200250300350400NH3 Volume Mixing Ratio (ppmv)100101Pressure (bar) Figure 10: Planetocentric Mollweide projection of our retrieved abundance of NH3 at 2 bar (configuration D). Longitudes are in system III.
All the points with a cloud transmittance lower than 0.05 has been removed.
Figure 11: Zonally-averaged NH3 abundance as a function of latitude. Green line: mean retrieved abundance of NH3 at 2 bar over all our
data. Green zone: standard deviation of our retrieved NH3 abundance in 1◦ bins. Yellow zone: mean uncertainty (per spectrum) on the NH3
abundance derived from the retrievals over the NH3 abundance at 2 bar. Grey dotted line: mean retrieved cloud transmittance over all our
data. Blue line: NH3 abundance at 2 bar as measured by MWR during Juno's perijove 1 (PJ1); data obtained with the courtesy of C. Li,
first published in Bolton et al. (2017).
11
85°S80°S75°S70°S65°S60°S55°S50°S45°S40°S35°S30°S25°S20°S15°S10°S5°S0°5°N10°N15°N20°N25°N30°N35°N40°N45°N50°N55°N60°N65°N70°N75°N80°N85°N360.0° W330.0° W300.0° W270.0° W240.0° W210.0° W180.0° W150.0° W120.0° W90.0° W60.0° W30.0° W04080120160200240280320360400NH3 Volume Mixing Ratio−60−40−200204060Planetocentric latit de (ࢪ∘050100150200250300350400Mean NH3 Vol me Mixing Ratio (ppmv∘0.000.020.040.060.080.100.120.14Mean clo d transmittance proach has some limits. For example, the Doppler shift,
the viewing angle, the solar incidence angle vary with the
spectra, while the telluric absorption varies with the spec-
tral cube, and these may not be well taken into account
in the averaging. Hence, the results we obtain by this
methodology should be taken particularly cautiously.
With the above-mentioned methodology, we obtained
two spectra. (i) In the first one, we averaged all the spectra
in the zones, (ii) while in the second one, we averaged the
spectra located in the zones between latitudes 15 ◦S and
5 ◦N, corresponding to the EZ.
In figure 12, we display the retrieved NH3 abundance
profiles of the two spectra for various a priori. We can see
that our domain of sensitivity remains roughly the same
compared to what we obtain in the belts: between 1 and
3 bar. There is no significant differences between the be-
haviour of the retrieved profiles for the EZ (dotted curves)
and for all the zones considered together (solid curves)
in the 1 -- 3 bar region. However, the behaviour of the NH3
abundance profiles is very different from what we obtained
in section 4.3.1 (figure 9). Instead of what can be inter-
preted as constant-with-depth abundance profiles in the
1 -- 3 bar range, we obtain a NH3 abundance that seems to
increase with depth, from ≈ 100 ppmv at 1 bar to ≈ 500
ppmv at 3 bar. This is the opposite of what was found by
MWR (Bolton et al., 2017) both in the zones -- where the
NH3 abundance is observed to decrease with depth from
≈ 300 ppmv at 0.7 bar to ≈ 200 ppmv at 7 bar -- and
in the EZ -- where the NH3 abundance is observed to re-
main constant at ≈ 400 ppmv. What we obtain is closer
to what was obtained in Giles et al. (2017), with a NH3
abundance increasing from ≈ 10 ppmv at 1 bar to ≈ 500
ppmv at 3 bar (or from 30 to 90 ppmv, depending on the
cloud model used). These differences in retrieved values
could be explained by the absence of light scattering in
our model.
In figure 13, we display our two averaged spectra and
two of the fits we obtained. We voluntarily removed the
1932 -- 1935 cm−1 region which is dominated by telluric ab-
sorption. We can see that we obtain a relatively good fit,
given the small noise considered. We can also see that the
different fits are relatively similar despite their different
initial a priori profiles.
4.4. NH3 VMR and cloud transmittance correlation
In figure 14 we display the retrieved cloud transmit-
tance as a function of our retrieved NH3 abundance at 2
bar for each of our spectra and each of our spectral cubes.
We decided to classify the spectra into three families, rep-
resented on the figures by different colors.
(i) The first
family (red) corresponds to the zones (clouds transmit-
tance < 0.05). (ii) The second family (green) corresponds
to all the spectra outside of the zones with a latitude com-
prised between 0 and 17 ◦N, which correspond to the NEB.
(iii) The third family (blue) are all the spectra outside of
the zones and NEB, which corresponds to the other belts.
The location of these families are displayed in this order
Figure 12: Retrieved NH3 abundance profiles for the average of the
spectra of all the zones (solid coloured curves) and for the average of
the spectra of the EZ only (dotted coloured curves). Yellow, orange,
red: retrieved NH3 abundance profile for respectively the dotted
black, dashed black and solid black a priori profiles. Green: retrieval
similar to configuration D, for the dashed black a priori profile. Pur-
ple: retrieved NH3 abundance profile for the dotted grey a priori
profile, with a slope from 100 ppmv at 1 bar to 600 ppmv at 4 bar.
Blue: retrieved NH3 abundance profile for the dashed grey a priori
profile, meant to be close to what was retrieved by MWR in the EZ.
In figure 11, we show the NH3 mole fraction at 2 bar
and the cloud transmittance longitudinally averaged over
1◦ latitude bins, and compare them with MWR retrieval
(Bolton et al., 2017). As expected, there is a huge un-
certainty on our results in the zones, and the mean abun-
dance retrieved here should be taken cautiously. We also
observe the same north/south NH3 abundance "slope" in
the belts (at the exception of the NEB) and poleward of
latitude 45◦ that we observed in figure 10. The NEB de-
pletion is also clearly visible. Globally, we obtain a mean
NH3 abundance close to what was found by MWR, but
we do not see evidence of the "plume" detected by MWR
in the EZ. This discrepancy can be explained both by our
latitude uncertainty (discussed in section 2.2), which can
reach ≈ 5◦ at the equator, and by our abundance uncer-
tainties in this region, which is greater than ± 300 ppmv.
In summary, our results are in good agreement with MWR
measurements. Our values of NH3 VMR in the NEB are
also consistent with the preliminary retrieval from JIRAM
observations North of two hotspots (Grassi et al., 2017).
4.3.2. Zones
As mentioned above in this section, the results we ob-
tain in the zones are much less reliable than in the belts,
due to the low SNR of the spectra in these regions.
In an attempt to enhance the SNR of the zones, we
averaged all the spectra in these regions, as well as their
corresponding Doppler shift and noise. Doing this allows
us, in first approximation, to divide the noise by the square
root of the number of spectra averaged. However, this ap-
12
02004006008001000NH3 Volume Mixing Ratio (ppmv)100101Pressure (bar) (a)
(b)
Figure 13: Fit of the average of the spectra in all the zones (top) and of the average of the spectra in the EZ only (bottom). The wavelengths
are given in the reference frame of Jupiter. The residuals are shown below. Dark blue: the average of the spectra, the errorbar represents the
1 sigma noise, divided by the square root of the number of the averaged spectra. Light blue: the convolved Earth's atmosphere transmittance,
with a Doppler shift of -0.15 cm−1, which is the mean of the Doppler shift of all the spectra in the zones. Yellow: our best fit using a NH3
abundance profile a priori of 100 ppmv below 0.8 bar. Purple: our best fit using a NH3 abundance profile a priori where the NH3 is increasing
with depth from 100 ppmv at 1 bar to 600 ppmv at 4 bar (see figure 12).
13
0123456Radiance (W⋅m−2⋅ r−1/cm−1)×10−50.00.20.40.60.8Sky tran mittance19361937193819391940Wavenumber (cm−1)−1.00−0.75−0.50−0.250.000.250.500.751.00Difference (W⋅m−2⋅sr−1/cm−1)×10−61σ3σ5σχ2/n = 5.69e+01χ2/n = 7.44e+01χ2/n = 1.47e+020123456Radiance (W⋅m−2⋅ r−1/cm−1)×10−50.00.20.40.60.8Sky tran mittance19361937193819391940Wavenumber (cm−1)−1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.5Difference (W⋅m−2⋅sr−1/cm−1)×10−61σ3σ5σχ2/n = 3.28e+01χ2/n = 3.72e+01χ2/n = 5.82e+01 (a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
(l)
Figure 14: Figures (a) to (c): retrieved cloud transmittance in function of our retrieved NH3 abundance for each spectrum of the spectral
cube taken at 09h36, 11h10 and 12h50 (see Table 1) in this order from left to right. Red: spectra with a retrieved cloud transmittance lower
than 0.05, corresponding to the zones. Green: spectra with a retrieved cloud transmittance greater than 0.05 and located between latitudes
0 and 17◦N, corresponding to the NEB. Blue: spectra located outside the NEB with a cloud transmittance greater than 0.05. Figures (d)
to (l): retrieved NH3 abundance and location of each spectra of each of our spectral cube, for each of the filters used in figure (a) to (c).
From top to bottom: spectra corresponding to respectively the red, green and blue points of figures (a) to (c). From left to right: spectra
corresponding to respectively the figure (a), (b) and (c). Latitudes are planetocentric and longitudes are in system III.
14
050100150200250300350400NH3 Volume Mixing Ratio (ppmv)0.000.050.100.150.200.250.30Cloud transmittance050100150200250300350400NH3 Volume Mixing Ratio (ppmv)0.000.050.100.150.200.250.30Cloud transmittance050100150200250300350400NH3 Volume Mixing Ratio (ppmv)0.000.050.100.150.200.250.30Cloud transmittance01020304050x px020406080y px-70°-65°-60°-55°-50°-45°-40°-35°-30°-25°-20°-15°-10°-5°0°5°10°15°20°25°30°35°40°45°50°55°60°65°70°75°120°120°120°150°180°210°240°240°240°05010015020025030035040001020304050x px020406080y px-70°-65°-60°-55°-50°-45°-40°-35°-30°-25°-20°-15°-10°-5°0°5°10°15°20°20°25°30°35°40°45°50°55°60°65°70°75°80°180°210°240°270°270°300°300°05010015020025030035040001020304050x px020406080y px-75°-70°-65°-60°-55°-50°-45°-40°-35°-30°-25°-20°-15°-10°-5°0°5°10°15°20°25°30°35°40°45°50°55°60°65°70°75°240°240°270°300°330°05010015020025030035040001020304050x px020406080y px-70°-65°-60°-55°-50°-45°-40°-35°-30°-25°-20°-15°-10°-5°0°5°10°15°20°25°30°35°40°45°50°55°60°65°70°75°120°120°120°150°180°210°240°240°240°05010015020025030035040001020304050x px020406080y px-70°-65°-60°-55°-50°-45°-40°-35°-30°-25°-20°-15°-10°-5°0°5°10°15°20°20°25°30°35°40°45°50°55°60°65°70°75°80°180°210°240°270°270°300°300°05010015020025030035040001020304050x px020406080y px-75°-70°-65°-60°-55°-50°-45°-40°-35°-30°-25°-20°-15°-10°-5°0°5°10°15°20°25°30°35°40°45°50°55°60°65°70°75°240°240°270°300°330°05010015020025030035040001020304050x px020406080y px-70°-65°-60°-55°-50°-45°-40°-35°-30°-25°-20°-15°-10°-5°0°5°10°15°20°25°30°35°40°45°50°55°60°65°70°75°120°120°120°150°180°210°240°240°240°05010015020025030035040001020304050x px020406080y px-70°-65°-60°-55°-50°-45°-40°-35°-30°-25°-20°-15°-10°-5°0°5°10°15°20°20°25°30°35°40°45°50°55°60°65°70°75°80°180°210°240°270°270°300°300°05010015020025030035040001020304050x px020406080y px-75°-70°-65°-60°-55°-50°-45°-40°-35°-30°-25°-20°-15°-10°-5°0°5°10°15°20°25°30°35°40°45°50°55°60°65°70°75°240°240°270°300°330°050100150200250300350400 mittance model from Lacis and Hansen (1974) we obtain
the following relation between NH3 abundance and the
cloud transmittance:
ppqNH3
3
2
τ =
tc(qNH3 ) =
greffρp(1 + frain)
(u + 1)2et − (u − 1)2e−t
4u
With:
(cid:114) 1 − gc ω
u =
t = τ(cid:112)3(1 − gc ω)(1 − ω)
1 − ω
(5)
(6)
Figure 15: Relation between cloud transmittance and NH3 VMR.
Grey: retrieved cloud transmittance of each spectrum of our spectral
cubes with respect to the retrieved NH3 abundance at 2 bar. Blue:
each line corresponds to transmittances calculated through Lacis and
Hansen (1974)'s and Ackerman and Marley (2001) cloud model for
a NH3-ice cloud situated at 0.8 bar and constituted of particles with
a size of 10 µm, for a frain of 45 (dotted), 80 (solid), 120 (dashed)
and 200 (dotted-dashed). Orange: same as blue, but for a NH4SH
cloud situated at 1.2 bar, for a frain of 150 (dotted), 250 (solid), 350
(dashed) and 700 (dotted-dashed).
from top to bottom in the column below their correspond-
ing figure. As expected, the retrieved NH3 abundance at 2
bar is very dispersed in the zones, due to the low SNR. It
appears that the NEB has a behaviour very different from
the other belts, with generally a lower NH3 abundance and
a higher cloud transmittance. The asymmetry of the SEB
is also visible: as we pass over the GRS from East to West
(figures 14a to 14c), thicker clouds cover the SEB while
the NH3 abundance remains constant.
In figure 15, we display the cloud transmittance as a
function of the NH3 abundance for each of our spectra.
To estimate the Spearman correlation coefficient of the
two parameters (i.e. how well the relationship between
the two parameters can be described using a monotonic
function) and the reliability of this coefficient, we applied
the following methodology. (i) We generated 1000 sets of
Gaussian random NH3 abundances, using as mean value
our retrieved NH3 abundances, and as standard deviation
our NH3 abundance uncertainties. (ii) Then, we calculated
the mean and the standard deviation of the Spearman cor-
relation coefficient between each of those set and our re-
trieved cloud transmittance. Taking only the points out-
side of the zones (5246 points), we obtained a Spearman
correlation coefficient of ≈ −0.23 ± 0.01. We interpret
these numbers as a fairly reliable evidence (low standard
deviation) of a weak anti-correlation (negative near zero
coefficient) between the cloud transmittance and the NH3
abundance. To physically explain this correlation, we con-
sidered the cloud optical thickness model by Ackerman
and Marley (2001) and the multi-scattering cloud trans-
15
And with τ the optical thickness of the cloud, p the ratio
of the molar mass of the particle over the molar mass of
the atmosphere, p the pressure of the cloud base, qNH3 the
abundance of NH3, g the gravity of the planet, reff the
area-weighted mean particle effective radius -- which fol-
lows a log-normal distribution with a geometric standard
deviation of 1.6 -- , ρp the density of the particle, frain
the ratio of the mass-averaged particle sedimentation ve-
locity to convective velocity, gc the asymmetry factor of
the cloud particles, and ω their single-scattering albedo.
The parameters gc and ω are calculated through Mie the-
ory from optical constants from Howett et al. (2007) and
Martonchik et al. (1984), and are displayed in Table 4.
With this relation, we are able to fit the observed cor-
relation with both an NH3-ice and an NH4SH cloud, for
different sets of our free parameters reff and frain (see Ta-
ble 4). These sets of parameters are roughly consistent
with the values retrieved by Ohno and Okuzumi (2017)
for example.
If we take large enough particles, we can use the droplet
terminal fallspeed equation from Ackerman and Marley
(2001) to calculate the corresponding eddy diffusion coef-
ficient Kzz. We obtain values between ≈ 105 and ≈ 108
cm2·s−1, depending on the particle size we choose, for ei-
ther NH3 or NH4SH particles. The values for 100 µm parti-
cles are of the same order of magnitude as the eddy mixing
coefficient expected from free convection, as discussed by
B´ezard et al. (2002). We can also note that Flasar and
Gierasch (1978), using a model of turbulent convection in
a rotating body, estimated Kzz ≈ 4×108 cm2·s−1 at 10
bar decreasing to 1×108 cm2·s−1 at 0.5 bar in the NEB,
in good agreement with our finding.
However, the cloud parameters we retrieved may vary
for each region. For example, it is possible that the hotspots
may have thinner clouds of smaller particles similar to
Galileo's probe results (Ragent et al., 1998, particle sizes
<10 µm), while the zones may be covered with thicker
clouds of larger particles. Moreover, we have no informa-
tion about the number of different cloud layers and their
respective base pressure or the chemical composition of
the clouds. More importantly, even if our simple model
fits relatively well the behaviour of the NEB, it cannot ex-
plain the behaviour of the other belts, mainly the SEB.
050100150200250300350400NH3 Volume Mixing Ratio (ppmv)0.000.050.100.150.200.250.30Cloud transmittance Table 4: Cloud parameters fitting the observed cloud transmittance-NH3 VMR at 2 bar correlation.
Particle
Cloud base
type
pressure (bar)
Particle
size (µm)
NH3-ice
NH4SH
0.8
1.2
10
100
10
100
(1)
gc
ω(1)
0.775
0.913
0.567
0.697
0.923
0.697
0.968
0.867
frain
(2)
(min -- max)
45 -- 200
10 -- 50
150 -- 700
25 -- 100
(cm2.s−1)
Kzz (min -- max)(2)
9.1×105 -- 2.0×105
4.1×108 -- 0.8×108
4.4×105 -- 0.9×105
2.6×108 -- 0.7×108
(1) At 5 µm.
(2) The minimum and maximum values correspond to a fit close to respectively the dotted
curve and the dashed-dotted curve of figure 15.
This inadequacy could be explained by the simplicity of
our model and the complexity of the meteorology of the
belts, or simply by the fact that the NH3 abundance is
roughly constant in the belts and is not correlated with
the cloud transmittance. In particular, the use of a single
eddy mixing coefficient to parametrize vertical transport
is likely too simplistic as it does not account for vertical
advection (either upwelling or downwelling) nor for hori-
zontal advection.
If we assume that NH3 drives at least partially the
clouds on Jupiter, so if we assume that our model is ad-
equate but too simple, our simplistic model suggests that
both NH3-ice and NH4SH are cloud constituents compati-
ble with our observations, but also that local meteorology
probably plays a significant in distributing gas and cloud
particles.
5. Conclusions
We were able to derive a map of the abundance of NH3
on Jupiter at 2 bar with a spatial resolution of ≈ 0.7"
and a mean uncertainty of 20%. The latitude coverage
is 75◦S -- 75◦N (planetocentric) and the longitude coverage
is 90 -- 360◦W (system III), although the information we
retrieved in the zones is of questionable quality.
Our results notably show:
1. a large NH3 depletion compared to other regions in
the NEB, with mixing ratio values around 160 ppmv
at 2 bar, of varying width with longitude,
2. a correlation between the most depleted regions in
NH3 of the disk, the brightest regions at 5 µm, the
"hotspots", and the blue-gray regions in the NEB in
visible light,
3. an enrichment in NH3 (≈ 250 ± 50 ppmv at 2 bar)
in the other belts compared to the NEB, with some
local exceptions (notably in the NTB and around the
GRS),
4. a north-to-south NH3 abundance "slope" in the belts,
at the exception of the NEB, with a poleward orien-
tation,
5. a similar north-to-south NH3 abundance slope north-
ward of latitude ≈ 45◦N, and possibly southward of
latitude ≈ 50◦S, starting at ≈ 240 ± 50 ppmv and
going down to ≈ 160 ± 30 ppmv,
6. in the zones and particularly in the EZ, our data sug-
gest a NH3 abundance increasing with depth, from
100 ± 15 ppmv at 1 bar to 500 ± 30 ppmv at 3 bar,
albeit with a relatively low confidence level,
7. a clear distinction in the behaviour of the NEB and
the other belts, in term of NH3 abundance and cloud
transmittance,
8. a strong dichotomy in term of cloud transmittance in
the SEB, between the East and the West of the GRS:
the western side seems to be perturbed by the GRS
and is covered by thicker clouds than the eastern
side,
9. a possible correlation between cloud transmittance
and NH3 abundance, more obvious in the NEB than
in the other belts,
10. according to cloud models, the above mentioned cor-
relation seems to indicate that NH3 plays a major
role in the formation of the cloud we observe at
5 µm, either through NH3-ice or NH4SH particles.
However our observations also shows that local me-
teorology probably play an important role in cloud
formation.
Compared with MWR results (Bolton et al., 2017), we
obtain on average a similar NH3 abundance in the 1 -- 3 bar
region (≈ 250 ppmv), and we observe the same depletion
in the NEB (down to ≈ 150 ± 30 ppmv at 2 bar). The
behaviour of NH3 at pressures greater than 4 bars is inac-
cessible to us, due to the lack of sensitivity of our spectral
range to greater pressures. We do not observe the "plume"
in the EZ and the behaviour of the zones in general seems
to be different, but the results we obtain in this region are
not as reliable as those for the belts.
Acknowledgements
D.B. and T.F. were supported by the Programme Na-
tional de Plan´etologie as well as the Centre National d'Etudes
Spatiales.
T.G. acknowledges funding supporting this work from
NASA PAST through grant number NNH12ZDAO01N-
PAST.
G.S.O. was supported by funds from the National Aero-
nautics and Space Administration distributed to the Jet
Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology.
16
Fletcher was supported by a Royal Society Research
Fellowship at the University of Leicester.
References
References
Achterberg, R. K., Conrath, B. J., and Gierasch, P. J. Cassini cirs
retrievals of ammonia in jupiter's upper troposphere. Icarus, 182
(1):169 -- 180, 2006.
ISSN 0019-1035. doi: https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.icarus.2005.12.020. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/
science/article/pii/S0019103505005087.
Ackerman, A. S. and Marley, M. S. Precipitating condensation clouds
in substellar atmospheres. The Astrophysical Journal, 556(2):872,
2001. URL http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/556/i=2/a=872.
Acton, C. H. Ancillary data services of nasa's navigation and an-
cillary information facility. Planetary and Space Science, 44(1):
65 -- 70, 1996. ISSN 0032-0633. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
0032-0633(95)00107-7. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/
science/article/pii/0032063395001077. Planetary data system.
Atreya, S. K., Wong, M. H., Owen, T. C., Mahaffy, P. R., Niemann,
H. B., de Pater, I., Drossart, P., and Encrenaz, T. A comparison of
the atmospheres of jupiter and saturn: deep atmospheric compo-
sition, cloud structure, vertical mixing, and origin. Planetary and
Space Science, 47(10 -- 11):1243 -- 1262, 1999. ISSN 0032-0633. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0032-0633(99)00047-1. URL //www.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032063399000471.
Baines, K. H., Carlson, R. W., and Kamp, L. W. Fresh ammonia
ice clouds in jupiter: I. spectroscopic identification, spatial dis-
tribution, and dynamical implications.
Icarus, 159(1):74 -- 94,
2002.
ISSN 0019-1035. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.2002.
6901. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/
pii/S0019103502969010.
Bjoraker, G. L., Wong, M. H., de Pater, I., and ´Ad´amkovics, M.
Jupiter's deep cloud structure revealed using keck observations of
spectrally resolved line shapes. The Astrophysical Journal, 810
(2):122, 2015. URL http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/810/i=
2/a=122.
Bolton, S. J., Adriani, A., Adumitroaie, V., Allison, M., Anderson,
J., Atreya, S., Bloxham, J., Brown, S., Connerney, J. E. P., De-
Jong, E., Folkner, W., Gautier, D., Grassi, D., Gulkis, S., Guillot,
T., Hansen, C., Hubbard, W. B., Iess, L., Ingersoll, A., Janssen,
M., Jorgensen, J., Kaspi, Y., Levin, S. M., Li, C., Lunine, J.,
Miguel, Y., Mura, A., Orton, G., Owen, T., Ravine, M., Smith,
E., Steffes, P., Stone, E., Stevenson, D., Thorne, R., Waite, J.,
Durante, D., Ebert, R. W., Greathouse, T. K., Hue, V., Parisi,
M., Szalay, J. R., and Wilson, R. Jupiter's interior and deep
atmosphere: The initial pole-to-pole passes with the juno space-
craft. Science, 356(6340):821 -- 825, 2017.
ISSN 0036-8075. doi:
10.1126/science.aal2108. URL http://science.sciencemag.org/
content/356/6340/821.
Borysow, J., Trafton, L., Frommhold, L., and Birnbaum, G. Model-
ing of pressure-induced far-infrared absorption spectra molecular
hydrogen pairs. Astrophysical Journal, 296:644 -- 654, sep 1985.
doi: 10.1086/163482.
Borysow, J., Frommhold, L., and Birnbaum, G. Collison-induced ro-
totranslational absorption spectra of h2-he pairs at temperatures
from 40 to 3000 k. Astrophysical Journal, 326:509 -- 515, mar 1988.
doi: 10.1086/166112.
Brown, L. R. and Peterson, D. B. An empirical expression
for linewidths of ammonia from far-infrared measurements.
Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 168(2):593 -- 606, 1994.
ISSN 0022-2852.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmsp.1994.
1305. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/
pii/S0022285284713051.
doi:
B´ezard, B., Lellouch, E., Strobel, D., Maillard, J. P., and Drossart,
P. Carbon monoxide on jupiter: Evidence for both internal and
external sources. Icarus, 159(1):95 -- 111, 2002. ISSN 0019-1035.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/icar.2002.6917. URL http://www.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103502969174.
Carlson, R. W., Baines, K. H., Anderson, M. S., Filacchione, G.,
and Simon, A. A. Chromophores from photolyzed ammonia re-
acting with acetylene: Application to jupiter's great red spot.
Icarus, 274(Supplement C):106 -- 115, 2016. ISSN 0019-1035. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2016.03.008. URL http://www.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103516001494.
Clough, S. A., Shephard, M. W., Mlawer, E. J., Delamere, J. S.,
Iacono, M. J., Cady-Pereira, K., Boukabara, S., and Brown,
P. D. Atmospheric radiative transfer modeling: a summary of
the aer codes. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Ra-
diative Transfer, 91(2):233 -- 244, 2005.
ISSN 0022-4073. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2004.05.058. URL http://www.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022407304002158.
de Pater, I. Jupiter's zone-belt structure at radio wavelengths: Ii.
comparison of observations with model atmosphere calculations.
Icarus, 68(2):344 -- 365, 1986.
ISSN 0019-1035. doi: https:
//doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(86)90027-8.
URL http://www.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0019103586900278.
de Pater, I., Dunn, D., Romani, P., and Zahnle, K. Reconciling
galileo probe data and ground-based radio observations of ammo-
nia on jupiter.
ISSN 0019-1035.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.2000.6527. URL http://www.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103500965278.
Icarus, 149(1):66 -- 78, 2001.
de Pater, I., Sault, R. J., Butler, B., DeBoer, D., and Wong,
M. H. Peering through jupiter's clouds with radio spectral imag-
ing. Science, 352(6290):1198 -- 1201, 2016. ISSN 0036-8075. doi:
10.1126/science.aaf2210. URL http://science.sciencemag.org/
content/352/6290/1198.
Drossart, P., Roos-Serote, M., Encrenaz, T., Lellouch, E., Baines,
K. H., Carlson, R. W., Kamp, L. W., Orton, G. S., Calcutt,
S., Irwin, P., Taylor, F. W., and Weir, A. The solar reflected
component in jupiter's 5-um spectra from nims/galileo observa-
tions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 103(E10):23043 --
23049, 1998.
ISSN 2156-2202. doi: 10.1029/98JE01899. URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98JE01899.
Einaga, H.
Jupiter
URL
alpo-j.asahikawa-med.ac.jp/indexE.htm. [Online; accessed 27-
November-2017].
image 2016/01/16(ut),
2016.
Flasar, F. M. and Gierasch, P. J. Turbulent convection within
rapidly rotating superadiabatic fluids with horizontal tempera-
ture gradients. Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics,
10(1):175 -- 212, 1978. doi: 10.1080/03091927808242636. URL
https://doi.org/10.1080/03091927808242636.
Fletcher, L. N., Greathouse, T. K., Orton, G. S., Sinclair, J. A.,
Giles, R. S., Irwin, P. G. J., and Encrenaz, T. Mid-infrared map-
ping of jupiter's temperatures, aerosol opacity and chemical dis-
tributions with irtf/texes. Icarus, 278(Supplement C):128 -- 161,
2016. ISSN 0019-1035. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2016.
06.008. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/
pii/S0019103516302834.
Folkner, W. M., Woo, R., and Nandi, S. Ammonia abundance in
jupiter's atmosphere derived from the attenuation of the galileo
probe's radio signal. Journal of Geophysical Research: Plan-
ets, 103(E10):22847 -- 22855, 1998. ISSN 2156-2202. doi: 10.1029/
98JE01635. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98JE01635.
Fouchet, T., Lellouch, E., B´ezard, B., Encrenaz, T., Drossart,
P., Feuchtgruber, H., and de Graauw, T.
Iso-sws observations
of jupiter: Measurement of the ammonia tropospheric profile
and of the 15n/14n isotopic ratio.
Icarus, 143(2):223 -- 243,
2000.
ISSN 0019-1035. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.1999.
6255. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/
pii/S0019103599962553.
Giles, R. S., Fletcher, L. N., and Irwin, P. G. J. Cloud struc-
ture and composition of jupiter's troposphere from 5-um cassini
vims spectroscopy. Icarus, 257:457 -- 470, 2015. ISSN 0019-1035.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2015.05.030. URL //www.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103515002407.
Giles, R. S., Fletcher, L. N., and Irwin, P. G. J.
Latitudi-
nal variability in jupiter's tropospheric disequilibrium species:
Geh4, ash3 and ph3.
Icarus, 289(Supplement C):254 -- 269,
2017. ISSN 0019-1035. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2016.
17
ical Research Letters, 44(10):4607 -- 4614, 2017. ISSN 1944-8007.
doi: 10.1002/2017GL073019. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/
2017GL073019. 2017GL073019.
Owen, T. and Terrile, R. J. Colors on jupiter. Journal of Geophysical
Research: Space Physics, 86(A10):8797 -- 8814, 1981. ISSN 2156-
2202. doi: 10.1029/JA086iA10p08797. URL http://dx.doi.org/
10.1029/JA086iA10p08797.
Ragent, B., Colburn, D. S., Rages, K. A., Knight, T. C. D., Avrin, P.,
Orton, G. S., Yanamandra-Fisher, P. A., and Grams, G. W. The
clouds of jupiter: Results of the galileo jupiter mission probe neph-
elometer experiment. Journal of Geophysical Research: Plan-
ets, 103(E10):22891 -- 22909, 1998. ISSN 2156-2202. doi: 10.1029/
98JE00353. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98JE00353.
Rodgers, C. D. Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: The-
ory and Practice. Series on Atmospheric, Oceanic and Plane-
tary Physics. World Scientific, 2000. ISBN 9789814498685. URL
https://books.google.fr/books?id=Xv7sCgAAQBAJ.
Roos-Serote, M., Drossart, P., Encrenaz, T., Lellouch, E., Carlson,
R. W., Baines, K. H., Kamp, L., Mehlman, R., Orton, G. S.,
Calcutt, S., Irwin, P., Taylor, F., and Weir, A. Analysis of
jupiter north equatorial belt hot spots in the 4 -- 5 um range from
galileo/near-infrared mapping spectrometer observations: Mea-
surements of cloud opacity, water, and ammonia. Journal of Geo-
physical Research: Planets, 103(E10):23023 -- 23041, 1998.
ISSN
2156-2202. doi: 10.1029/98JE01049. URL http://dx.doi.org/
10.1029/98JE01049.
Seiff, A., Kirk, D. B., Knight, T. C. D., Young, R. E., Mihalov, J. D.,
Young, L. A., Milos, F. S., Schubert, G., Blanchard, R. C., and
Atkinson, D. Thermal structure of jupiter's atmosphere near the
edge of a 5-um hot spot in the north equatorial belt. Journal
of Geophysical Research: Planets, 103(E10):22857 -- 22889, 1998.
ISSN 2156-2202. doi: 10.1029/98JE01766. URL http://dx.doi.
org/10.1029/98JE01766.
Sromovsky, L. A., Collard, A. D., Fry, P. M., Orton, G. S., Lem-
mon, M. T., Tomasko, M. G., and Freedman, R. S. Galileo probe
measurements of thermal and solar radiation fluxes in the jovian
atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 103(E10):
22929 -- 22977, 1998.
ISSN 2156-2202. doi: 10.1029/98JE01048.
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98JE01048.
von Zahn, U., Hunten, D. M., and Lehmacher, G. Helium in jupiter's
atmosphere: Results from the galileo probe helium interferometer
experiment. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 103(E10):
22815 -- 22829, 1998.
ISSN 2156-2202. doi: 10.1029/98JE00695.
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98JE00695.
Wong, M. M., Bjoraker, G. L., Smith, M. D., Flasar, F. M., and
Nixon, C. A.
Identification of the 10-um ammonia ice fea-
ture on jupiter. Planetary and Space Science, 52(5):385 -- 395,
2004. ISSN 0032-0633. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2003.
06.005. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/
pii/S003206330300223X. Jupiter after Galileo and Cassini.
10.023. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/
pii/S0019103516304365.
Grassi, D., Adriani, A., Mura, A., Dinelli, B. M., Sindoni, G., Tur-
rini, D., Filacchione, G., Migliorini, A., Moriconi, M. L., Tosi,
F., Noschese, R., Cicchetti, A., Altieri, F., Fabiano, F., Piccioni,
G., Stefani, S., Atreya, S., Lunine, J., Orton, G., Ingersoll, A.,
Bolton, S., Levin, S., Connerney, J., Olivieri, A., and Amoroso,
M. Preliminary results on the composition of jupiter's troposphere
in hot spot regions from the jiram/juno instrument. Geophysi-
cal Research Letters, 44(10):4615 -- 4624, 2017.
ISSN 1944-8007.
doi: 10.1002/2017GL072841. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/
2017GL072841. 2017GL072841.
Howett, C. J. A., Carlson, R. W., Irwin, P. G. J., and Calcutt, S. B.
Optical constants of ammonium hydrosulfide ice and ammonia
ice. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 24(1):126 -- 136, Jan 2007. doi: 10.1364/
JOSAB.24.000126. URL http://josab.osa.org/abstract.cfm?
URI=josab-24-1-126.
Irwin, P. G. J., Weir, A. L., Taylor, F. W., Calcutt, S. B., and Carl-
son, R. W. The origin of belt/zone contrasts in the atmosphere
of jupiter and their correlation with 5-um opacity. Icarus, 149(2):
397 -- 415, 2001. ISSN 0019-1035. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/
icar.2000.6542. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/
article/pii/S0019103500965424.
Lacis, A. A. and Hansen, J. A parameterization for the absorp-
tion of solar radiation in the earth's atmosphere. Journal of
the Atmospheric Sciences, 31(1):118 -- 133, 1974. doi: 10.1175/
1520-0469(1974)031(cid:104)0118:APFTAO(cid:105)2.0.CO;2.
URL https://
doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1974)031<0118:APFTAO>2.0.CO;2.
Lacy, J. H., Richter, M. J., Greathouse, T. K., affe, D. T., and Zhu,
Q. Texes: A sensitive high-resolution grating spectrograph for
the mid-infrared. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the
Pacific, 114:153 -- 168, feb 2002. doi: 10.1086/338730.
Langlois, S., Birbeck, T. P., and Hanson, R. K. Diode laser mea-
surements of h2o line intensities and self-broadening coefficients
in the 1.4-um region. Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 163(1):
27 -- 42, 1994. ISSN 0022-2852. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/
jmsp.1994.1004. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/
article/pii/S0022285284710046.
Li, C., Ingersoll, A., Janssen, M., Levin, S., Bolton, S., Adumitroaie,
V., Allison, M., Arballo, J., Bellotti, A., Brown, S., Ewald, S.,
Jewell, L., Misra, S., Orton, G., Oyafuso, F., Steffes, P., and
Williamson, R. The distribution of ammonia on jupiter from a
preliminary inversion of juno microwave radiometer data. Geo-
physical Research Letters, 44(11):5317 -- 5325, 2017.
ISSN 1944-
8007. doi: 10.1002/2017GL073159. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.
1002/2017GL073159. 2017GL073159.
Loeffler, M. J. and Hudson, R. L. Coloring jupiter's clouds: Radi-
olysis of ammonium hydrosulfide (nh4sh). Icarus, 302:418 -- 425,
2018. ISSN 0019-1035. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2017.
10.041. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/
pii/S0019103517304396.
Martonchik, J. V., Orton, G. S., and Appleby, J. F. Optical proper-
ties of nh3 ice from the far infrared to the near ultraviolet. Appl.
Opt., 23(4):541 -- 547, Feb 1984. doi: 10.1364/AO.23.000541. URL
http://ao.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-23-4-541.
Melin, H., Fletcher, L. N., Donnelly, P. T., Greathouse, T. K., Lacy,
J. H., Orton, G. S., Giles, R. S., Sinclair, J. A., and Irwin, P. G. J.
Assessing the long-term variability of acetylene and ethane in
the stratosphere of jupiter. Icarus, 2017. ISSN 0019-1035. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2017.12.041. URL http://www.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103517306139.
Ohno, K. and Okuzumi, S. A condensation -- coalescence cloud model
for exoplanetary atmospheres: Formulation and test applications
to terrestrial and jovian clouds. The Astrophysical Journal, 835
(2):261, 2017. URL http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/835/i=
2/a=261.
Orton, G. S., Momary, T., Ingersoll, A. P., Adriani, A., Hansen,
C. J., Janssen, M., Arballo, J., Atreya, S. K., Bolton, S.,
Brown, S., Caplinger, M., Grassi, D., Li, C., Levin, S., Moriconi,
M. L., Mura, A., and Sindoni, G. Multiple-wavelength sensing of
jupiter during the juno mission's first perijove passage. Geophys-
18
Annexes
These annexes describe the equations used in our radiative transfer model.
5.1. Optical depth
Relationship between cm(z), the column number density of attenuating specie m at altitude z and Vm(z), the Volume
Mixing Ratio (a.k.a. abundance) of specie m at altitude z:
cm(z) =
Vm(z)n0[T (z), P (z)]dz
where n0[T (z), P (z)] is the Loschmidt constant at temperature T (z) and pressure P (z).
Optical depth at wavenumber ν, atmospheric level k and for attenuating specie m:
Nlevels(cid:88)
τν,m(k) =
σm(ν, l)cm(l) =
αm(ν, l)
l=k
l=k
(cid:90) ∞
0
Nlevels(cid:88)
where Nlevels is the number of atmospheric levels and σm is the attenuation cross section of the attenuating specie m.
αm(ν, l) will be called "column attenuation coefficient", with αm(ν, l) ≡ σm(ν, l)cm(l).
Optical depth at wavenumber ν and for atmospheric level k:
Nspecies(cid:88)
m=1
τν(k) =
τν,m(k)
where Nspecies is the number of different attenuating species.
Optical depth at cloud level kc:
τν(kc) =
Nspecies(cid:88)
Nlevels(cid:88)
αm(ν, l)
Relationship between optical depth and spectral directional transmittance at emission angle θe:
m=1
l=kc
Derivative of spectral directional transmittance over logarithm of column number density of specie m:
Tν(k, θe) = e−τν (k) sec(θe)
(cid:16)− sec(θe)(cid:80)Nspecies
(cid:80)Nlevels
l=k
σs(ν, l)eln cs(l)(cid:17)
∂Tν(k, θe)
∂ ln cm(k)
⇔ ∂Tν(k, θe)
∂ ln cm(k)
∂ exp
=
s=1
∂ ln cm(k)
= − sec(θe)αm(ν, k)e−τν (k) sec(θe)
5.2. Cloud transmittance
Total cloud hemispherical transmittance:
Nlevels(cid:89)
(cid:34)Nclouds(cid:89)
(cid:35)
Tc,n(k)
Tc(k) =
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
where Tc,n(k) is the hemispherical transmittance of cloud n at level k. Tc,n(k) = 1 above the cloud top level and below
the cloud bottom level.
Derivative of total cloud hemispherical transmittance over cloud n hemispherical transmittance:
l=k
n=1
∂(cid:81)Nlevels
l=k
(cid:104)(cid:81)Nclouds
n=1
∂Tc,n(k)
(cid:105)
Tc,n(l)
∂Tc(k)
∂Tc,n(k)
∂Tc(k)
∂Tc,n(k)
Tc(l)
Tc(l)
⇔
⇔ ∂(cid:80)Nlevels
⇔ ∂(cid:80)Nlevels
l=1
l=1
∂Tc,n(k)
∂Tc,n(k)
=
=
=
=
Tc(k)
Tc,n(k)
Tc(1)
Tc,n(k)
(cid:80)k
+
l=1 Tc(l)
Tc,n(k)
19
Tc(2)
Tc,n(k)
+ ... +
Tc(k)
Tc,n(k)
+ 0 + ... + 0
(14)
5.3. Reflection contribution
Spectral radiance reflected by the cloud at emission angle θe:
(15)
with Rc the hemispherical reflectance of the cloud, E(cid:12) the spectral irradiance of the Sun and θ(cid:12) the cosine of the local
zenith angle. Level kc is the atmospheric level of the highest altitude cloud.
Lr(ν) = RcE(cid:12)(ν)e− sec(θ(cid:12))τν (kc)e− sec(θe)τν,m(kc)
Derivative of radiance reflected by the cloud over logarithm of gas abundance:
∂Lr
∂ ln cm(k)
∂Lr
∂ ln cm(k)
⇔
∂RcE(cid:12)e−[sec(θe)+sec(θ(cid:12))]τν (kc)
∂ ln cm(k)
=
= − [sec(θe) + sec(θ(cid:12))] σm(ν, k)cm(k)Lr
if k ≥ kc, 0 else.
Derivative of spectral radiance reflected by the cloud over cloud n hemispherical transmittance at level k:
∂Lr
∂Tc,n(k)
∂Lr
∂Tc,n(k)
∂Lr
∂Tc,n(k)
⇔
⇔
=
∂Tc,n(k)
∂RcE(cid:12)e−[sec(θe)+sec(θ(cid:12))]τν (kc)
≈ ∂(1 − Tc(kc))
∂Tc,n(k)
≈ − Tc(kc)
Tc,n(k)
E(cid:12)e−[sec(θe)+sec(θ(cid:12))]τν (kc)
E(cid:12)e−[sec(θe)+sec(θ(cid:12))]τν (kc)
if k ≥ kc, 0 else.
(16)
(17)
5.4. Thermal contribution
Thermal spectral radiance:
(cid:90) ∞
⇔ Lth(ν) ≈ Nlevels(cid:88)
Lth(ν) =
0
Tc(z)Bν[T (z)]de− sec(θe)τν (z)
e−τν (l+1) sec(θe) − e−τν (l) sec(θe)(cid:17)
(cid:16)
Tc(l)
Bν[T (l)]
l=1
⇒ Lth(ν) = Tc(1)(e−τν (2) sec(θe) − e−τν (1) sec(θe)) Bν[T (1)] + Tc(2)(e−τν (3) sec(θe) − e−τν (2) sec(θe))Bν[T (2)] + ...
⇒ Lth(ν) = −Tc(1)Bν[T (1)]e−τν (1) sec(θe) + Tc(2)(Bν[T (1)] − Bν[T (2)])e−τν (2) sec(θe) + ... + Tc(k)Bν[T (k)]e−τν (k) sec(θe)
⇒ Lth(ν) = −Tc(1)Bν[T (1)]e−τν (1) sec(θe) +
Tc(l)(Bν[T (l − 1)] − Bν[T (l)])e−τν (l) sec(θe)
Nlevels(cid:88)
l=2
Derivative of thermal spectral radiance over logarithm of column number density of specie m:
(cid:16)−Tc(1)Bν[T (1)]e−τν (1) sec(θe) +(cid:80)Nlevels
l=2
Tc(l)(Bν[T (l − 1)] − Bν[T (l)])e−τν (l) sec(θe)(cid:17)
k(cid:88)
Tc(l)(Bν[T (l)] − Bν[T (l − 1)])e−τν (l) sec(θe)
∂
=
∂Lth(ν)
∂ ln cm(k)
⇔ ∂Lth(ν)
∂ ln cm(k)
= sec(θe)αm(ν, k)
(cid:32)
∂ ln cm(k)
Tc(1)Bν[T (1)]e−τν (1) sec(θe) +
l=2
Derivative of thermal spectral radiance over cloud transmittance at level k:
∂
(cid:16)(cid:80)Nlevels
(cid:80)k
l=1 Tc(l)(e−τν (l+1) sec(θe) − e−τν (l) sec(θe)) Bν[T (k)]
Tc(l)(e−τν (l+1) sec(θe) − e−τν (l) sec(θe)) Bν[T (l)]
∂Tc,n(k)
l=1
(cid:17)
Tc,n(k)
∂Lth(ν)
∂Tc,n(k)
⇔ ∂Lth(ν)
∂Tc,n(k)
=
=
20
(18)
(cid:33)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
5.5. Cloud contribution
Cloud spectral radiance:
Lc(ν, k) = dTc(k)/dk e−τν (k) sec(θe)Bν[T (k)]
⇔ Lc(ν, k) ≈ (Tc(k + 1) − Tc(k))e−τν (k) sec(θe)Bν[T (k)]
(Tc(l + 1) − Tc(l)) e−τν (k) sec(θe)Bν[T (l)]
⇔ Lc(ν) ≈ Nlevels(cid:88)
≈ ∂(cid:80)Nlevels
l=1
l=1
Derivative of cloud spectral radiance over logarithm of column density number:
Derivative of cloud spectral radiance over cloud hemispherical transmittance:
∂Lc(ν)
∂ ln cm(k)
⇔ ∂Lc(ν)
∂ ln cm(k)
ν,k,gas sec(θe)Bν[T (k)]
(Tc(k + 1) − Tc(k))e−τ
∂ ln cm(k)
(Tc(k + 1) − Tc(l))e−τν (k) sec(θe)Bν[T (l)]
k(cid:88)
≈ − sec(θe)αm(ν, k)
l=1
≈ ∂(cid:80)Nlevels
(cid:104)(cid:80)k−1
l=1
≈
(Tc(l + 1) − Tc(l))e−τν (l) sec(θe)Bν[T (l)]
∂Tc,n(k)
l=1 (Tc(l + 1) − Tc(l))e−τν (l) sec(θe)Bν[T (l)]
Tc,n(k)
(cid:105) − Tc(k)e−τν (k) sec(θe)Bν[T (k)]
∂Lc(ν)
∂Tc,n(k)
⇔ ∂Lc(ν)
∂Tc,n(k)
5.6. Total contribution
Total spectral radiance:
L(ν) = Lth(ν) + Lc(ν) + Lr(ν)
21
|
1905.05821 | 1 | 1905 | 2019-05-14T20:13:33 | A Chromaticity Analysis and PSF Subtraction Techniques for SCExAO/CHARIS data | [
"astro-ph.EP",
"astro-ph.IM"
] | We present an analysis of instrument performance using new observations taken with the Coronagraphic High Angular Resolution Imaging Spectrograph (CHARIS) instrument and the Subaru Coronagraphic Extreme Adaptive Optics (SCExAO) system. In a correlation analysis of our datasets (which use the broadband mode covering J through K band in a single spectrum), we find that chromaticity in the SCExAO/CHARIS system is generally worse than temporal stability. We also develop a point spread function (PSF) subtraction pipeline optimized for the CHARIS broadband mode, including a forward modelling-based exoplanet algorithmic throughput correction scheme. We then present contrast curves using this newly developed pipeline. An analogous subtraction of the same datasets using only the H band slices yields the same final contrasts as the full JHK sequences; this result is consistent with our chromaticity analysis, illustrating that PSF subtraction using spectral differential imaging (SDI) in this broadband mode is generally not more effective than SDI in the individual J, H, or K bands. In the future, the data processing framework and analysis developed in this paper will be important to consider for additional SCExAO/CHARIS broadband observations and other ExAO instruments which plan to implement a similar integral field spectrograph broadband mode. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | Draft version May 16, 2019
Typeset using LATEX preprint style in AASTeX62
9
1
0
2
y
a
M
4
1
.
]
P
E
h
p
-
o
r
t
s
a
[
1
v
1
2
8
5
0
.
5
0
9
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
A Chromaticity Analysis and PSF Subtraction Techniques for SCExAO/CHARIS data
Benjamin L. Gerard,1, 2 Christian Marois,2, 1 Thayne Currie,3, 4, 5 Timothy Brandt,6
Jeffrey K. Chilcote,7 Zachary H. Draper,1, 2 Tyler Groff,8 Olivier Guyon,9, 10
Masahiko Hayashi,11 Nemanja Jovanovic,12 Gillian R. Knapp,13 Tomoyuki Kudo,4
Jungmi Kwon,14 Julien Lozi,4 Frantz Martinache,15 Michael McElwain,8
Motohide Tamura,16, 10 and Taichi Uyama16
1University of Victoria, Department of Physics and Astronomy, 3800 Finnerty Rd, Victoria, V8P 5C2, Canada
2National Research Council of Canada, Astronomy & Astrophysics Program, 5071 West Saanich Rd, Victoria, V9E
3NASA-Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA
2E7, Canada
4Subaru Telescope, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 650 North A'oh¯ok¯u Place, Hilo, HI 96720, USA
5Eureka Scientific, 2452 Delmer Street Suite 100, Oakland, CA, USA
6Department of Physics, University of California-Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
7Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, 225 Nieuwland Science Hall, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA
8NASA-Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
9Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
10Astrobiology Center, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan
11NAOJ, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan
12Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
13Department of Astrophysical Science, Princeton University, Peyton Hall, Ivy Lane, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
14ISAS/JAXA, 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Chuo-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-5210, Japan
15Universit´e Cote d'Azur, Observatoire de la Cote d'Azur, CNRS, Laboratoire Lagrange, France
16Department of Astronomy, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo,
113-0033, Japan
(Received February 18, 2019; Revised May 9, 2019; Accepted May 14, 2019)
Submitted to AJ
ABSTRACT
We present an analysis of instrument performance using new observations taken with
the Coronagraphic High Angular Resolution Imaging Spectrograph (CHARIS) instru-
ment and the Subaru Coronagraphic Extreme Adaptive Optics (SCExAO) system. In a
correlation analysis of our datasets (which use the broadband mode covering J through
K band in a single spectrum), we find that chromaticity in the SCExAO/CHARIS sys-
tem is generally worse than temporal stability. We also develop a point spread function
(PSF) subtraction pipeline optimized for the CHARIS broadband mode, including a for-
ward modelling-based exoplanet algorithmic throughput correction scheme. We then
present contrast curves using this newly developed pipeline. An analogous subtraction
Corresponding author: Benjamin L. Gerard
[email protected]
2
Gerard, B. L. et al.
of the same datasets using only the H band slices yields the same final contrasts as the
full JHK sequences; this result is consistent with our chromaticity analysis, illustrat-
ing that PSF subtraction using spectral differential imaging (SDI) in this broadband
mode is generally not more effective than SDI in the individual J, H, or K bands. In
the future, the data processing framework and analysis developed in this paper will be
important to consider for additional SCExAO/CHARIS broadband observations and
other ExAO instruments which plan to implement a similar integral field spectrograph
broadband mode.
Keywords: planets and satellites: general, techniques:
image processing, techniques:
high angular resolution
1. INTRODUCTION
Ground-based exoplanet imaging is currently uniquely poised to understand how giant planets form
and evolve over time. Distinct from other exoplanet detection methods, exoplanet imaging is currently
sensitive to wide separations (greater than about 10 AU), young ages (less than about 1 Gyr), and
high masses (greater than about one Jupiter mass; e.g., Nielsen et al. 2019). However, the push to
closer separations, older ages, and lower masses is constantly improving with new instrumentation
and processing algorithms.
Post-processing of high contrast imaging data is currently a crucial component of reaching the
necessary contrasts in order to detect new exoplanets by subtracting the correlated speckle noise
around their host star. There are three main point spread function (PSF) subtraction observing
strategies used to improve the exoplanet signal to noise ratio (S/N): spectral differential imaging
(SDI; Rosenthal et al. 1996; Racine et al. 1999; Marois et al. 2000; Sparks & Ford 2002), angular
differential imaging (ADI; Marois et al. 2006a), and the commonly used reference differential imaging
RDI algorithm. Although these strategies are often combined with more advanced least-squares
subtraction algorithms (e.g., Lafreni`ere et al. 2007; Soummer et al. 2012), all three methods remain
fundamentally limited by PSF chromaticity (SDI and RDI) and/or temporal stability (ADI and
RDI). Thus, understanding and mitigating the level of chromatic and temporal decorrelation in high
contrast imaging datasets is a crucial step towards improving contrast to detect fainter and/or lower
mass exoplanets.
Although significant efforts have been made to understand the relative impact of temporal stability
vs. chromaticity from a numerical perspective (e.g. Marois et al. 2008; Vigan et al. 2010), a similar
comprehensive on-sky analysis with second generation high contrast imaging instruments that are
equipped with an integral field spectrograph (IFS) has not yet been completed. Hinkley et al. (2007),
and Milli et al. (2016) have carried out temporal analyses on the quasi-static speckle lifetime, but with
no corresponding chromaticity analysis. Following from the work of Marois et al. (2010), temporal
correlation analyses have informed some new ADI+SDI PSF subtraction pipelines to select reference
images ranked by correlation (e.g. Currie et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2015). (Marois et al. 2014) presented
an analyses of time- vs. wavelength-dependent correlation in individual target images. In this paper
we will extend this analysis to multiple target images; later we will show that such correlation can
vary significantly depending on observing conditions and on location in the coronagraphic image.
SCExAO/CHARIS chromaticity analysis
3
The main focus of this paper is thus to present a detailed analysis of chromaticity and temporal
stability using our observations from the Subaru adaptive optics system (AO188; Minowa et al. 2010),
Subaru Coronagraphic Extreme Adaptive Optics (SCExAO; Jovanovic et al. 2015b), and Corona-
graphic High Angular Resolution Imaging Spectrograph (CHARIS; Groff et al. 2016, 2017). We also
present new modifications to the ADI+SDI-based template locally optimized combination of images
(TLOCI; Marois et al. 2014) PSF subtraction pipeline for these datasets. Our SCExAO/CHARIS
datasets use a Lyot coronagraph in the broadband JHK mode, covering the full 1.15 - 2.39 µm range
at R∼18 (Groff et al. 2016); this new low resolution broadband mode, currently unique to CHARIS
amongst current high contrast imaging instruments, is thought to provide a potential gain in achiev-
able contrast through SDI PSF subtraction for an achromatic system (Marois et al. 2008, 2014),
and so our performance analysis and PSF subtractions methods will focus on impacts of using this
broadband mode.
The structure of this paper is as follows: in §2 we present details of our target observations, in §3
we present the architecture of our PSF subtraction pipeline (§3.2) and then use the same reference
image selection and correlation calculation procedures to carry out a detailed chromaticity analysis
(§3.3), in §4 we present final contrast curves and discuss instrument performance implications for the
future, and we conclude in §5. Additional correlation analysis is presented in appendix A.
2. OBSERVATIONS
We observed a handful of young, nearby two temperature-component debris disks, the extrasolar
analogues of the Asteroid and Kuiper belts in our Solar System (Wyatt 2008). We identified targets
in Kennedy & Wyatt (2014) that had not yet been observed by the Gemini Planet Imager (GPI; Mac-
intosh et al. 2014) or Spectro-Polarimetric High-contrast Exoplanet REsearch instrument (SPHERE;
Beuzit et al. 2008) and/or are inaccessible to either for being too far north. We also observed two
additional targets in 2018A through ancillary time (Hodapp 2018). Our observed targets are listed
in Table 1, including dates of observations, exposure times, and field of view (FOV) rotation.
UT date
(d/m/yy)
9/4/17
9/4/17
9/4/17
9/4/17
9/4/17
7/1/18
8/1/18
8/1/18
name
(HD)
70313
98673
109085
125162
141378
23267
" "
38206
mV
5.51
6.43
4.3
4.18
5.53
6.88
" "
5.73
texp
(s)
15
31
13
20
31
60
" "
31
nframes
107
91
93
93
70
50
40
118
Table 1. Table of our target observing parameters.
∆PA
(deg)
25
22
18
21
21
32
24
27
Observations were made in the standard pupil tracking mode for ADI. The coronagraphic setup
in this broadband mode utilized the standard Lyot coronagraph, applying the 217 mas diameter
focal plane mask (FPM), for which the inner working angle (IWA; separation at which an off-axis
4
Gerard, B. L. et al.
companion would have 50% optical throughput relative to the center of the star) is 113 mas; at the
time, no other coronagraph options offered sufficient performance over the full broadband mode of
CHARIS. The deformable mirror waffle spots (Marois et al. 2006b; Sivaramakrishnan & Oppenheimer
2006; Jovanovic et al. 2015a), or "satellite spots," are applied with a non-standard amplitude for the
April 2017 data, and so instead an on-sky non-coronagraphic data sequence (using an ND filter but
with the same Lyot stop) is taken to measure the star-to-spot ratio directly (see §3.1). The January
2018 data uses the standard 50 nm amplitude spots and corresponding pre-computed star-to-spot
ratio as in Currie et al. (2018a).
3. DATA ANALYSIS
3.1. Data Cube Extraction and Setup
We used the CHARIS data reduction pipeline (DRP; Brandt et al. 2017) to generate data cubes
from recorded IFS detector images, which uses a least-squares method to extract the flux in each
slice of the data cube (Draper et al. 2014). A background subtraction, flat field correction, and
bad pixel mask are also applied in the extraction process as described in Brandt et al. (2017). All
images are then prepared for subsequent PSF subtraction (§3.2) and correlation analysis (§3.3). The
satellite spots are used for image registration, magnification with wavelength to align speckles, flux-
normalization to remove the wavelength dependence of the broadband transmission filter and stellar
spectrum, and contrast calibration. We chose to magnify the images with wavelength centered around
slice 16 of 22 (λ0 = 2.0µm). Slice 16 was chosen instead of slice 11 (λ = 1.7µm; in the middle of the
bandpass) because of wavelength-dependent sampling issues. The CHARIS PSF in J and H band is
slightly under-sampled, and we found that cubic spline interpolation, used to rotate and magnify the
images for our ADI+SDI PSF subtraction algorithm (§3.2), provided a more accurate centroiding
precision from numerical interpolation in K band. The four satellite spots all lie at 15.91 λ0/D
separation, and so measured satellite spot positions in the registered, magnified images are used to
calculate a plate scale for contrast curve measurements (§4). We were not able to use any on-sky
astrometric data to validate these derived plate scale values. Images are then high-pass-filtered using
a 4.1×4.1 λ0/D median boxcar filter to attenuate the smooth AO halo while retaining a close-to-unity
algorithmic throughput of λ/D-scale static speckles and any possible planet(s). The λ2 dependence
of the satellite spot intensity is also removed during the flux normalization procedure. The satellite
spots are omitted from reference image selection in §3.2 and correlation calculations for analysis in
§3.3. Finally, all registered, magnified, flux-normalized, high-pass-filtered images are converted into
"raw" contrast units (i.e., the pixel value-to-star ratio throughout the whole image) using measured
and pre-calibrated star-to-satellite spot ratios, whose data acquisition is described at the end of §2.
The same registration, magnification, flux normalization, and high-pass filtering procedure is applied
to the custom April 2017 star-to-spot calibration data before computing the ratios.
3.2. PSF Subtraction
Our ADI+SDI PSF subtraction algorithms build on the least-squares-based locally optimized com-
bination of images (LOCI; Lafreni`ere et al. 2007) algorithm, further developed by Marois et al. (2010)
and Marois et al. (2014) as Template LOCI (TLOCI). A conceptual illustration of the procedure used
in our TLOCI pipeline to subtract a single region of a single target image is shown in Fig. 1.
In addition to the process of generating least-squares coefficients to subtract a region of the target
image, Fig. 1 also illustrates the principle of forward modelling (FM), where the same coefficients
SCExAO/CHARIS chromaticity analysis
5
Figure 1. A block diagram illustrating the process of least-squares-based PSF subtraction and forward
modelling. The junctions combine the two boxes (connected to a "+" or "-") and output to a third box. The
junctions with a "-" sign indicate that the output box is the difference between the two images represented
by input boxes. All other boxes, where the two junctions are "+" signs, represent a more abstract process of
combining two input concepts (i.e., an image, a vector of images, a vector of coefficients, and/or a selection
criterion) to produce an output concept. The inputs, on the lower left of the diagram, include a model of
both the exoplanet target image and all other reference images in the sequence, both in time and wavelength,
including the assumed spectrum of the planet. These models are then used to define a selection criterion,
which is combined with correlation of each reference image in the sequence to the target image in order
to select the best reference images to use in subtracting the target image. After a few intermediate steps
involving the calculation of least squares coefficients, the outputs are illustrated on the right side of the
diagram, including a subtracted image along with a noiseless forward model of the planet signal in the
subtracted image.
are also used to model the algorithmic exoplanet throughput during the subtraction. As shown, a
selection criterion, or aggressiveness, specifies that reference images be selected beyond a radial and/or
azimuthal gap in wavelength and/or time, respectively, from the target image in order to minimize
algorithmic exoplanet throughput losses. The highest aggressiveness of 1 (using dimensionless units
calculated from relative aperture photometry between the target and reference image models) would
allow using any reference image in the full target sequence, including the target image. In contrast,
the lowest aggressiveness of 0 would not allow any reference images in the target sequence to be
selected. Aggressiveness is also illustrated in Fig. 2. In this figure, a range of times and wavelengths
around the target image are not selectable because, if used, a planet present in the target image
would be partially subtracted by the same planet in the reference images. This un-selectable region
of Fig. 2, illustrated by a white color, would be either larger or smaller for a lower or higher value
of user-defined aggressiveness, respectively. The size of this un-selectable region also depends on the
least-squares coefficients correla0on to target image least-squares image subtracted image exoplanet model of target image exoplanet models of reference images Δt Δλ reference images least-squares FM forward model (FM) op0miza0on region subtrac0on region target image selec0on criterion (Δλ, Δt) + + + + + + + + + - + + - + 6
Gerard, B. L. et al.
Figure 2. Correlation of selectable reference images to a single target image. The target image is illustrated
with a correlation of 1 in the center of the white region. Various correlation trends illustrate the stability of
the sequence in time and wavelength. Darker vertical lines illustrate wavelength-dependent effects, including
the atmospheric water bands at wavelength slices 5 and 14, a degradation of performance towards the red
edge of K band, while darker horizontal lines illustrate time-dependent effects from variable AO and/or
quasi-static stability.
separation in the image, assumed exoplanet spectrum, wavelength, and parallactic angle relative to
the target image. The target image is highlighted in the center of this region with a correlation
of one. Then, reference images are chosen from the remaining sample based on correlation, also
illustrated in Fig. 2. Generally, the most correlated reference images are near the target image time
or wavelength, although this depends on the temporal stability and chromaticity of the sequence. A
more correlated set of reference images (i.e., those with a more similar speckle pattern to the target
image) provides a better basis for the least-squares algorithm and will yield a deeper final contrast
without changing any other free parameters (Marois et al. 2014). We will examine the chromatic
and temporal dependence of these correlations further in §3.3. Additional details are described below
about the setup and new modifications of our TLOCI pipeline.
To help define, identify, and remove uncorrelated images from each dataset, we will introduce a new
free parameter into our PSF subtraction pipeline called a correlation cut. For a single target image,
the value of a correlation cut will define the minimum level of correlation that is rendered acceptable
in a reference image used to subtract the target image speckle pattern. A given target image/region
will be discarded from the subtracted sequence if there are not at least Nref reference images above
the correlation cut value, all of which must pass a selection criterion, where Nref and aggressiveness
are also free parameters. For example, if correlation cut = 0.5 and Nref = 10 but there are only
five reference images that are greater than 50% correlated to the target image using a moderate
aggressiveness, the target image/region will be discarded from the sequence. The target image would
be discarded in this case even if, e.g., one of those five reference images is 99% correlated to the
target image. Thus, it is clearly important to use a physically motivated correlation cut so that a
maximal number of target images in an observing sequence can be subtracted while still rejecting a
05101520j = wavelength index010203040i = time indexHD23267, Jan7, (i,j)=(17,10),291 mas<<477 mas, Sp. Type = L00.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0correlation1.251.501.752.002.25wavelength (m) SCExAO/CHARIS chromaticity analysis
7
maximal number of uncorrelated reference images. Marois et al. (2010) and subsequent papers have
shown that using correlated reference images is crucial to prevent unnecessary noise propagation
in the covariance matrix inversion step of a least-squares/principal component analysis subtraction
algorithm. The correlation cut values are dimensionless by definition and have a minimum and
maximum of 0 and 1, respectively. Analysis in appendix A inform the decision to use the following
correlation cut values for the four different radial sections of an image, progressing from innermost
to outermost separation: 0.8, 0.74, 0.67, and 0.59. Although the specific angular separations of these
regions varies for each target based on our method of measuring the pixel scale using the satellite
spots (§3.1), the average separation and standard deviation across all targets is: 104±2 mas < ρ <
286±4 mas, 286±4 mas < ρ < 468±7 mas, 468±7 mas < ρ < 649±10 mas, and ρ > 649±10 mas.
A graphical illustration of these zones is illustrated later in §3.2. Note that we chose to fix the
radial separation of subtraction regions based on pixel separation, which is why the derived angular
separation varies slightly from target to target. In pixels, the radial separations for each annulus for
all targets are 7 < ρ < 19, 19 < ρ < 32, 32 < ρ < 44, and ρ > 44.
Based on the definitions and work in Marois et al. (2010) and Johnson-Groh (2016), for all
subsequent analyses in this paper we use an L0 or T6 input spectrum (J02281101+2537380 and
J02281101+2537380 from Burgasser et al. 2008 and Burgasser et al. 2004, respectively, subsequently
convolved and binned to the appropriate CHARIS spectral resolution), an aggressiveness of 0.5 and
15 reference images per least-squares subtraction. Gerard & Marois (2016) found, on GPI datasets,
that optimizing aggressiveness and number of reference images yielded a negligible gain in contrast,
and so here we use the same aggressiveness, number of reference images per subtraction, and input
spectral types (to define a selection criterion and for subsequent forward modelling). We use a sin-
gular value decomposition (SVD) cut-off value for the covariance matrix inversion of 1 × 10−4, as in
Gerard & Marois (2016), where a maximum value of 1 would set all the LOCI coefficients to zero.
Although this is a low value compared to other algorithms (e.g. Currie et al. 2018b), note that there
are many degeneracies between the number of reference images used, reference image correlation,
and SVD cut-off (Marois et al. 2010); our approach here uses a lower SVD cut-off but compensates
by selecting more correlated reference images.
In a new addition to our TLOCI pipeline, the central region of each subtraction region is defined
by both the parallactic angle and wavelength at any given timestamp, and so the location of a single
region will both rotate with time and magnify with wavelength over a single observing sequence,
similar to the approach in Wang et al. (2015). These definitions are used so that the subtraction
regions line up after de-rotation and de-magnification, which allows the generation of a FM map for
each target. The LOCI optimization regions are defined for each subtraction region as the other
two azimuthal regions at the same radial separation. This subtraction/optimization region geometry
ensures that the least-squares coefficients are never generated from the subtraction zone where a
planet would be. S/N maps are calculated using back-rotated images, as in Gerard & Marois (2016).
A few example data products of a single target sequence from our PSF-subtraction pipeline are shown
in Figure 3, including a subtracted collapsed data cube, corresponding S/N map, and corresponding
FM map.
For each target we also run a bootstrapping procedure, illustrated in Figures 4 and 5.
As in
Marois et al. (2010) and Marois et al. (2014), we implement a FM algorithmic throughput correction
procedure in each subtraction region of the image, including a model for the radial variation of the
8
Gerard, B. L. et al.
Figure 3. PSF-subtracted data products for a single target, HD141378. Left: an image of a collapsed
PSF-subtracted sequence. Middle: an S/N map of the left image. Right: a collapsed forward model map.
Note the relative absence of dark shadows in the radial relative to azimuthal direction. This suggests that
images at the same wavelength and different time are more correlated than images at a different time and
same wavelength, causing the former to be selected as reference images more often than the latter.
Figure 4. Right: definitions of the different subtraction regions defined in the final collapsed image. "k" and
"l" represent the radial and azimuthal indices for each subtraction region, respectively. Left: the locations
of simulated planets (one per subtraction).
algorithmic throughput within each region. In addition to the center, four additional FM throughput
corrections using the same LOCI coefficients are computed at smaller and larger separations within
each subtraction region. A fifth order polynomial is then fit to the radial variation of throughput
correction values to generate a continuous function across the region. As a result of this throughput
correction procedure, a bootstrapped planet at any location in the image (i.e., not necessarily at
the radial or azimuthal center of a subtraction region), is extracted at the input value and does not
need any additional throughput correction. This is illustrated in Fig. 5. The simulated planets
were injected throughout the image, one per subtraction region, such that none lies at the radial or
azimuthal center of the region, as in the left panel of Fig. 4. Almost all recovered fluxes match the
EN500 mas-2e-06-1e-06-1e-06-5e-070e+005e-071e-062e-062e-06normalized contrast1012345S/NHD141378, T6100001000RA offset (mas)15001000500050010001500Dec offset (mas)100001000RA offset (mas)k=0k=1k=2k=3l=0l=1l=2 SCExAO/CHARIS chromaticity analysis
9
Figure 5. The injected and recovered fluxes of the simulated planets illustrated in Fig. 4, as well as the
5σ contrasts corresponding to the separation of each simulated planet (calculated from the back-rotated
images). The same conventions for "k" and "l" are used here as in Fig. 4.
input value within their expected scatter, materialized by the 5σ contrast value at the location of
the planet.
3.3. Chromaticity Analysis
As discussed in §1, in a perfectly achromatic system, the larger "lever arm" of wavelength coverage
over the JHK filter of CHARIS should provide a better algorithmic exoplanet throughput than a
narrower bandpass, and so if both cases provide the same level of speckle subtraction, the final
throughput-corrected contrast should be better in the former case. However, in reality broadband
systems are not achromatic, and the level of wavefront decorrelation, or chromaticity (i.e., separate
from wavelength magnification), will ultimately determine the limits of speckle subtraction via SDI
processing (e.g., Marois et al. 2008). In this section we will measure the chromaticity in our CHARIS
datasets, which will then inform the SDI speckle subtraction limits in §4.
105104103k = 0MK=T6MK=L0105104103normalized contrast units k = 1105104103k = 2inputoutput, l=0output, l=1output, l=25 contrast05101520wavelength slice = j105104103k = 305101520wavelength slice = jHD23267, Jan7 10
Gerard, B. L. et al.
A generalization of Figure 2 extends to Figure 6, which shows the median correlation of all of our
targets as a function of time and wavelength. Fig. 6 is generated as follows:
Figure 6. The median correlation of selectable references over all the observed targets, separated into
time and wavelength. The shaded regions show the robust standard deviation over all targets. Each panel
corresponds to a different separation in the image. For every target image, each selectable reference image
is identified as either the target wavelength and a different time (j = jtarget, i (cid:54)= itarget; top x-axis) or the
target time and a different wavelength (i = itarget, j (cid:54)= jtarget; bottom x-axis). The main conclusion from
this figure is that there is significant chromaticity at small and large separations over the full JHK bandpass;
at adjacent wavelengths SDI may still be advantageous, but this figure suggests that this is not the case for
a large wavelength lever arm across the full bandpass (see §4 for a validation of this hypothesis).
30201001020300.00.20.40.60.81.0median correlation (full sequence)104±2 mas << 286±4 mastimewavelength30201001020300.00.20.40.60.81.0286±4 mas << 468±7 mastimewavelength3020100102030j - jtarget (wavelength indicies)0.00.20.40.60.81.0median correlation (full sequence)468±7 mas << 650±10 mastimewavelength3020100102030j - jtarget (wavelength indicies)0.00.20.40.60.81.0> 650±10 mastimewavelength15810653053106158i - itarget (time indicies)15810653053106158i - itarget (time indicies)1581065305310615815810653053106158 SCExAO/CHARIS chromaticity analysis
11
1. For a single target image at a single time, wavelength, and user-defined separation, spectral
type, and aggressiveness, a selection criterion is applied to all of the images in the oberving
sequence; images that do not meet this criterion are discarded.
2. Correlation of the target image with every remaining image from step 1 is computed, normalized
to unity using the standard deviation in both the target image and reference images. Steps 1-2
are illustrated in Fig. 2.
3. In order to create a common zero-point for every subsequent target image (i.e., so the central
index of Fig. 6 is zero for every target image), each correlation value from step 2 is saved in
a two dimensional array of size 2it × 2jt, where it and jt are the total number of time stamps
and wavelength slices, respectively (i.e., so both the negative and positive indices can be shown
in Fig. 6). The x and y indices that fill a quarter of the total area of the two dimensional
array for each correlation value from step 2 are (2it − itarget) and (2jt − jtarget), respectively,
where itarget and jtarget are the indices of time and wavelength for the target image. This index
definition ensures that the target image is in the center, or zero point, of each 2it × 2jt array.
Both the region removed by the selection criterion and the other three quarters of the array
remain empty and are filled with "not a number" (NaN) placeholders.
4. Steps 1 - 3 are repeated over time and wavelength for every target image within a single
observing sequence, generating a vector of two dimensional arrays of size itjt × 2it × 2jt. The
autocorrelation of each target image is in the center of each 2it × 2jt array.
5. A median is taken across the zeroth axis of the vector in step 4 (i.e., the axis of dimension
itjt), ignoring NaN values, to generate a two dimensional array of size 2it × 2jt, representing
the median correlation between the target image and every other image in the sequence. A
slice along the x direction of this array at y = jt (the zero point of the wavelength direction)
reveals the median correlation of the target image (at x = it) vs. time, whereas a slice along
the y direction of this array at x = it reveals the median correlation vs. wavelength.
6. Steps 1-5 are repeated over each user-defined spectral type.
7. Steps 1-6 are repeated over each user-defined separation.
8. Steps 1-7 are repeated for each target, computing the median and standard deviation of corre-
lation over time and wavelength for each separation.
The outcome of the above procedure is illustrated in Figure 6, whereas steps 1-7 are illustrated in
Fig. 7, for which we used a separate dataset from our sample, the κ And data from Currie et al.
(2018b). Rather than a single target in our sample, the Currie et al. (2018b) dataset was chosen for
Fig. 7 to understand how the conclusions from Fig. 6 change with higher quality AO correction.
The main empirical conclusion from Figures 6 and 7 is that SCExAO/CHARIS datasets are gen-
erally more correlated as a function of time than as a function of wavelength, most notably at small
and large separations. This is particularly important at small separations, where PSF subtraction
algorithms generally underperform compared to the rest of the image. For a given difference in
parallactic angle and/or wavelength between a target and reference image, the respective azimuthal
and/or radial movement of an exoplanet in between the two images is larger at larger separations. In
12
Gerard, B. L. et al.
Figure 7. Median correlation with time and wavelength for the κ And dataset from Currie et al. (2018b),
illustrating that on a more stable dataset chromaticity is generally also much better compared to Fig. 6.
other words, For a given aggressiveness, more reference images near the target image, both in time
and wavelength, have to be discarded at lower separations compared to higher separations. Although
a longer wavelength lever arm would help overcome this problem, Figures 6 and 7 illustrate that
this would generally add unnecessary noise in the covariance matrix inversion. A more correlated
image at the same wavelength and different time will be selected instead. Later in §4 we will test the
predictions from Fig. 6 on our PSF subtraction pipeline.
With that said, at small separations in Fig. 6 and at all separations in Fig. 7, reference images
are actually more correlated at the closest wavelengths than at the closest times. Although these
images will be preferentially selected for SDI processing, this approach will not necessarily reach
30201001020300.00.20.40.60.81.0median correlation106 mas << 292 mastimewavelength30201001020300.00.20.40.60.81.0292 mas << 478 mastimewavelength3020100102030j - jtarget (wavelength indicies)0.00.20.40.60.81.0median correlation478 mas << 664 mastimewavelength3020100102030j - jtarget (wavelength indicies)0.00.20.40.60.81.0> 664 mastimewavelength4530150153045i - itarget (time indicies)4530150153045i - itarget (time indicies)45301501530454530150153045kappa And SCExAO/CHARIS chromaticity analysis
13
the deepest (throughput-corrected) final contrasts. Selecting a closer wavelength will reach a better
non-throughput-corrected contrast but will also cause more self-subtraction, therefore requiring a
larger throughput correction. Thus, the optimal reference selection based on final, throughput-
corrected contrast will ultimately depend on optimizing the trade off between correlation and self-
subtraction, as in Gerard & Marois (2016). Additionally, although the chromaticity is still worse
than the temporal-stability in Fig. 7, note that there is a significant improvement in both temporal
stability and chromaticity between Fig. 6 and 7. Although the improvement from temporal stability
is most likely from improved AO performance (strehl ratios for the Currie et al. 2018b dataset are
around 0.92), the origin of chromaticity improvement is not clear and will require further investigation
and analysis, beyond the discussion below.
Although the specific origin of the observed chromaticity is beyond the scope of this paper, we
discuss a few possibilities here that could explain these results.
In general, Fresnel propagation
generates a chromatic evolution of the wavefront from any out-of-pupil plane optics, particularly for
optics that are transmissive and/or near the focal plane (e.g., Marois et al. 2008), as well as from
atmospheric scintillation (Guyon 2005), although both of these effects are expected to be very weak
at the current level of raw contrasts (but see Madurowicz et al. 2018, who show that in some cases
scintillation effects are observed in GPI data). Additional sources of the observed behavior may
be algorithmic in nature, arising from either numerical interpolation errors and/or DRP extraction
errors. These numerical interpolation errors are wavelength-dependent when aligning data cubes,
since, as discussed in §3.1, the full CHARIS bandpass goes from near the Nyquist sampling limit in
J band to more oversampled in K band. Although numerical interpolation errors are more likely to
disproportionally effect the J band (from under-sampling effects) while DRP extraction errors are
more likely to affect the K band (from increased thermal background effects), further investigation
is needed to understand the relative impact of either effect. At small separations there are two
additional possible origins of the observed chromaticity: the atmospheric dispersion corrector (ADC)
and the FPM IWA. The ADC does not sufficiently offset differential atmospheric tip/tilt to center the
FPM on the star at the red edge of the K band. For the FPM IWA, because our chromaticity analysis
uses magnified data cubes to align speckles as a function of wavelength, the IWA on magnified data
cubes varies between about 2 and 4 λ/D at the red and blue ends of the bandpass, respectively,
which could explain the observed chromaticity in the inner-most radial zone.
4. CONTRAST CURVES
Our 5σ contrast curves are shown in Fig. 8. Final contrasts are calculated using the standard
deviation at each separation in a 3 pixel-wide annulus on the collapsed, back-rotated images. Raw
contrasts are calculated on a median image of the stack of the registered, magnified, flux-normalized,
high-pass-filtered images (i.e., the same image preparation used before the correlation analysis in
addition to a median stack of the full sequence). Also note that the frames used to calculate raw
contrast are not de-rotated to align the parallactic angle, thus keeping quasi-static aberration aligned
during the median collapse.
Although other deeper contrasts have been reached with CHARIS on more stable datasets (e.g.,
Currie et al. 2018b; Rich et al. 2018), the main purpose of this paper is instead to provide a detailed
correlation analysis (§3.3) that can be used as a reference for future CHARIS observations (e.g.,
considering the impact of SDI in broadband mode).
14
Gerard, B. L. et al.
Figure 8. (a): contrast curves for all of our targets. (b): Final contrasts at a single wavelength, slice 7 =
1.5 µm. Each target is color coded (the same in both figures); the solid, dashed, and dotted lines indicate
the raw, final L-type, and final T-type contrasts, respectively.
With that said, Fig. 8 a and b does show that T-type subtractions generally reach up to ∼50%
deeper contrasts than the corresponding L-type subtractions for the same target, illustrating that
SDI is improving contrast. Contrasts in a single slice are shown in addition to the final broadband
contrasts to control for the effects of noise averaging in comparing an L- vs. T-type reduction. In
applying a weighted average using the assumed planet spectral type to collapse the final subtracted
cube, noisier frames that lie further away from the bright part(s) of the spectrum are given less
weight to the final collapsed cube (Marois et al. 2014), and so looking only at a single wavelength
slice at the peak of the H band T-type spectrum removes this affect. Although other wavelengths
will not show as much of a performance gain further away from the T-type spectrum peak, a deeper
contrast reached by a T-type vs. L-type, at any wavelength, illustrates that SDI is being used to
improve contrast. This improvement occurs because, within the 15 reference images that are chosen
to subtract a target image at a given time and wavelength, some are at the same time but different
wavelength as the target image. These results are consistent with our analysis in §3.3 which showed
that chromaticity generally prevents using a reference image for SDI with a large wavelength lever
arm, but that reference images closer in wavelength were often more correlated than images closer
in time. For a T-type subtraction, the relative lack of long dark shadows in the spectral (i.e., radial)
direction of the right panel of Fig. 3 is also consistent with these results; selecting the reference
images closest in wavelength, especially for a T-type subtraction, are still often more correlated than
the closest images in time.
Along these lines, because the main conclusions of Figures 6 and 7 indicate that reference images
at a large wavelength difference from the target image are unlikely to be selected (i.e., separate from
the hypothesis of whether or not SDI is improving contrast), we carried out the exact same PSF
subtraction procedure as described in §3.2 on all seven targets using only the H band wavelengths
within the broadband data cubes (i.e., slices 6 - 13). The idea here is to see what level of contrast
200400600800radial separation (mas)(a)681012145 contrast (mag)rawL-type subtractionT-type subtraction200400600800radial separation (mas)(b)681012145 contrast, slice 7 (mag)HD23267, Jan7HD23267, Jan8HD38206HD141378HD125162HD109085HD98673HD70313 SCExAO/CHARIS chromaticity analysis
15
improvement is lost by removing the broadband feature of CHARIS while still using SDI in a standard
∼20% bandpass. Note that using the same parameters as in §3.2 (e.g., Nref=15) means that there
are less available reference images as a function of wavelength to select for the H band-only sequence.
However, because reference images are selected by correlation, our chromaticity analysis in §3.3 and
Figure 6 has determined that images at these wider wavelength differences are generally not selected,
and so we expect this discrepancy to have a negligible effect on final contrast.
Figure 9. The difference in contrast for each target when using the full JHK dataset vs. only the H band
to do PSF subtraction, illustrated here for a single wavelength slice at the center of H band (slice 11 in the
full JHK cube). The color and line styles are the same representation as in Fig. 8.
Fig. 9 illustrates the contrast difference on a single slice in the center of H band for all of our
targets between the full broadband mode and the H band mode. Note that comparing the collapsed
cubes between the broadband and H-only subtractions would introduce a systematic bias; in the
final wavelength collapse the broadband dataset would average more slices than the H-only dataset,
producing a deeper final contrast for the former even if the individual subtracted cubes are the same
for both sequences. In general, all of our April 2017 observations show little to no gain using the
broadband dataset, as expected from Fig. 6. Interestingly, the January 2018 observations, which
reach the deepest raw and final contrasts in Fig. 8, instead consistently show a ∼0.5 - 1 magnitude
gain from using the broadband mode. Also when using the broadband mode, in a few cases at
separations less than about 200 mas, the L-type subtractions appear to decrease in contrast by up
to a magnitude.
Ultimately, the origin of this observed chromaticity that may be improving and/or degrading con-
trast will need to be better understood before a detailed analysis leading to mitigation strategies can
be done. As discussed in §3.3, many different possible sources of chromaticity could reproduce the
results in Figures 6, 7, and 9. These sources may be algorithmic and/or optical in nature, and could
be quasi-static and/or time-variable. However, independent of the origin, in this paper we illustrate
100200300400500600700800900radial separation (mas)1.00.50.00.51.01.5JHK/Hcube (mag)HD23267, Jan7HD23267, Jan8HD38206HD141378HD125162HD109085HD98673HD70313L-type subtractionT-type subtraction 16
Gerard, B. L. et al.
that chromaticity in our broadband datasets is limiting the final achievable contrast, thus motivating
the need for further work towards more achromatic ExAO systems.
In this paper, we have presented a detailed correlation analysis, data processing architecture, and
final contrast curves of our SCExAO/CHARIS broadband datasets to the community. Our main
findings are as follows:
5. CONCLUSIONS
1. A correlation analysis of the SCExAO/CHARIS system across all seven of our targets shows
that for small ((cid:46)300 mas) and large ((cid:38)650 mas) separations, chromaticity across the full JHK
bandpass is worse than temporal stability across the full observing sequence (Fig. 6). This
result suggests that at these separations, the large wavelength "lever arm" of our CHARIS
broadband datasets could not be used advantageously to improve SDI post-processing (i.e.,
slices in J band can generally not be used to subtract slices in K band, and vice versa).
2. With that said, we find that our T-type PSF subtractions generally reach up to ∼50% deeper
final contrasts than our L-type subtraction of the same target (Fig. 8), illustrating that more
correlated wavelength slices close to the target image wavelength are being used to improve
contrast. This is consistent with the findings of point 1 above (i.e., Fig. 6); together, these
results illustrate that improved contrast from SDI processing of our targets comes from selecting
reference slices closer in wavelength to the target image where chromaticity is less significant.
3. We present a modified framework for exoplanet algorithmic throughput correction using forward
modelling that is designed for the CHARIS broadband mode (§3.2). As a result, simulated
planets are recovered in good agreement with their input values even when close to the 5σ
noise floor (Fig. 5).
4. PSF-subtracted sequences using only the H-band slices within the broadband dataset generally
reach final contrasts that are similar to the final contrasts of the same slices in the broadband
sequences (Fig. 9), validating the claim made in points 1 and 2 above.
Beyond the work presented in this paper, as long as ExAO systems remain limited by temporal sta-
bility (i.e., preventing subtraction to the photon noise limit using ADI and/or RDI post-processing,
thus motivating the additional need for SDI-processing), chromaticity will also limit the deepest
contrasts that can be reached. Looking towards the future, coherent differential imaging (CDI; e.g.,
Guyon 2004; Bord´e & Traub 2006; Baudoz et al. 2006; Give'On et al. 2007; Serabyn et al. 2011;
Sauvage et al. 2012; Jovanovic et al. 2018, and references therein) is a complimentary approach to-
wards reaching deeper contrasts on ExAO systems. CDI can operate in a narrow bandpass (i.e., in
contrast with SDI) and is therefore, in principle, not limited by chromaticity. However, detailed char-
acterization of colder/lower mass exoplanet atmospheres will continually push the ExAO community
towards reaching deeper broadband contrasts, in which case chromaticity will ultimately become a
fundamental limitation to this goal. The future push towards reaching deeper contrasts will therefore
also require a push towards implementing more achromatic broadband systems.
The data in this paper was obtained through 2017B open use Canadian and US Gemini ex-
change time (Gerard 2017). We gratefully acknowledge research support of the Natural Sciences
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
SCExAO/CHARIS chromaticity analysis
17
and Engineering Council of Canada through the Postgraduate Scholarships-Doctoral discovery grant
(DG), and Technologies for Exo-Planetary Science Collaborative Research and Training Experience
programs. The development of SCExAO was supported by the JSPS (Grant-in-Aid for Research
#23340051, #26220704 #23103002), the Astrobiology Center of the National Institutes of Natural
Sciences, Japan, the Mt Cuba Foundation and the directors contingency fund at Subaru Telescope.
CHARIS was built at Princeton University under a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Inno-
vative Areas from MEXT of the Japanese government (# 23103002). We thank Jason Wang and
Jean-Baptiste Ruffio for helpful discussions and suggestions about forward modelling. The authors
thank the anonymous referee for his or her comments and suggestions that have significantly im-
proved this manuscript. The authors acknowledge and support the cultural and spiritual importance
of the summit of Mauna Kea to the Hawaiian native community. We are grateful to share and respect
this land with the community.
APPENDIX
A. ADDITIONAL CORRELATION ANALYSIS
(a)
(c)
(b)
(d)
Figure 10. (a) and (b): the 15 most correlated selectable reference images (i.e., reference image numbers
0 through 14, using a zero-index counting system) at a single wavelength slice as a function of time and
at a single time stamp as a function of wavelength, respectively, both for large separations and assuming
a L0 template selection criterion. (c) and (d): The 15th most correlated selectable reference image at all
separations and for two input spectral types (c) at a single wavelength as a function of time and (d) at a single
time as a function of wavelength (i.e., reference image number 14 as a function of time and wavelength).
010203040i = time index02468101214reference image numberHD23267, Jan7,j=10, >663 mas, MK = L00.650.700.750.800.850.90correlation05101520j = wavelength index02468101214reference image numberHD23267, Jan7,i=17, >663 mas, MK = L00.50.60.70.80.9correlation01020304050i = time index0.60.70.80.9correlation of 15th bestselectable referenceHD23267, Jan7,j=10, MK: solid=L0, dashed=T6105 mas<<291 mas291 mas<<477 mas477 mas<<663 mas>663 mas05101520j = wavelength index0.50.60.70.80.91.0correlation of 15th bestselectable referenceHD23267, Jan7,i=17, MK: solid=L0, dashed=T6105 mas<<291 mas291 mas<<477 mas477 mas<<663 mas>663 mas 18
Gerard, B. L. et al.
Figure 11. The median correlation of the 15th most correlated, selectable reference image and corresponding
robust standard deviation over all times, wavelength, and input spectral types, at each separation for each
target. Our adopted correlation cut values are illustrated by the horizontal dashed lines, color coded to each
separation.
Additional correlation analysis informed our choice of values for a correlation cut, as discussed in
§3.2. Still using the HD 23267 Jan. 7 dataset, frame 17, slice 10 as an example (as in Fig. 2), Fig.
10 illustrates the trends in correlation of selected reference images at either the same time or same
wavelength (i.e., i = 17 or j = 10, respectively). The top two panels show the correlation trends of the
15 most correlated images as defined in §3.2, Nref=15) at large separations as a function of time (a)
or wavelength (b) at large separations, using an aggressiveness of 0.5, and using an assumed L0 input
spectrum. Uncorrelated frames can be identified as vertical "streaks" in these images (e.g., the water
bands at j = 5 and j = 14, as in Fig. 2). The chosen correlation cut value at this separation should
reject these uncorrelated frames from the sequence in order to prevent unnecessary noise amplification
in the least-squares algorithm (Marois et al. 2010). Because we require that all 15 reference images
lie above our defined correlation cut value, the bottom panels of Fig. 10 show a one dimensional slice
of the top two panels: the correlation of reference image number 14 (i.e., the 15th most correlated
selectable reference, using a zero-index counting system) as a function of time (c) and wavelength
(d) for both spectral types and all separations. Similarly, at all separations and spectral types we
would like to discard the frames where there are "dips" in these plots in order to optimally reject
uncorrelated images and avoid propagating them through the least-squares algorithm. Fig. 10 c and
d also suggest that larger separations may be less correlated overall and that a different correlation
cut value will be needed for each separation. Note that the low correlation at larger separations may
be a result of wavefront decorrelation at those spatial frequencies and/or increased background noise
because the speckles at those separations are detected at a lower S/N. At a given separation, using
a correlation cut value that is too high will reject too many images at that separation and return
only a minimal number of subtracted frames to the final collapsed cube; the "optimal" correlation
cut value should balance rejecting too many images with propagating too much noise through the
least-squares algorithm.
The extension of Fig. 10 c and d is to calculate the median behavior over a full sequence and for
all targets. Thus, for a single target at a given separation, in Fig 11 we compute the median and
HD70313HD98673HD109085HD125162HD141378HD23267, Jan7HD23267, Jan8HD382060.60.81.0correlation of 15th best selectable reference104±2 mas << 286±4 mas286±4 mas << 468±7 mas468±7 mas << 649±10 mas> 649±10 mas SCExAO/CHARIS chromaticity analysis
19
robust standard deviation for the 15th most correlated reference image over all target images (time
and wavelength) and input spectral types. Fig. 11 illustrates that, for most targets, the 15th most
correlated image decreases in correlation with separation, motivating the use of different correlation
cut values at each separation. The horizontal dashed lines in Fig. 11 illustrate our chosen correlation
cut values at each separtion. We set these values to generally lie near the bottom of the corresponding
1σ error bars over all targets. Using this definition to define the correlation cut values will balance the
rejection of bad frames relative to the median correlation value without discarding too many frames
from the sequence.
In general, the optimal correlation cut value will vary for each least-squares
subtraction and is degenerate with SVD cutoff and number of reference images (Marois et al. 2010);
this will ultimately require a more optimized approach (e.g. Gerard & Marois 2016), but is beyond
the scope of this paper.
Baudoz, P., Boccaletti, A., Baudrand, J., &
Gerard, B. 2017, S17A-TE261: Search for
REFERENCES
Rouan, D. 2006, in IAU Colloq. 200: Direct
Imaging of Exoplanets: Science & Techniques,
ed. C. Aime & F. Vakili, 553 -- 558
Beuzit, J.-L., Feldt, M., Dohlen, K., et al. 2008, in
Proc. SPIE, Vol. 7014, Ground-based and
Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II,
701418
Bord´e, P. J., & Traub, W. A. 2006, ApJ, 638, 488,
doi: 10.1086/498669
Brandt, T. D., Rizzo, M., Groff, T., et al. 2017,
Journal of Astronomical Telescopes,
Instruments, and Systems, 3, 048002,
doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.3.4.048002
Burgasser, A. J., Liu, M. C., Ireland, M. J., Cruz,
K. L., & Dupuy, T. J. 2008, ApJ, 681, 579,
doi: 10.1086/588379
Burgasser, A. J., McElwain, M. W., Kirkpatrick,
J. D., et al. 2004, AJ, 127, 2856,
doi: 10.1086/383549
Currie, T., Debes, J., Rodigas, T. J., et al. 2012,
ApJ, 760, L32,
doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/760/2/L32
Currie, T., Kasdin, N. J., Groff, T. D., et al.
2018a, Publications of the Astronomical Society
of the Pacific, 130, 044505,
doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aaab41
Currie, T., Brandt, T. D., Uyama, T., et al. 2018b,
AJ, 156, 291, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aae9ea
Draper, Z. H., Marois, C., Wolff, S., et al. 2014, in
Proc. SPIE, Vol. 9147, Ground-based and
Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V,
91474Z
exoplanets scultping debris disks with
SCExAO+CHARIS, Gemini Proposal: Subaru
Exchange Time
Gerard, B. L., & Marois, C. 2016, in Proc. SPIE,
Vol. 9909, Adaptive Optics Systems V, 990958
Give'On, A., Belikov, R., Shaklan, S., & Kasdin,
J. 2007, Optics Express, 15
Groff, T., Chilcote, J., Brandt, T., et al. 2017, in
Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation
Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 10400,
Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation
Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 1040016
Groff, T. D., Chilcote, J., Kasdin, N. J., et al.
2016, in Proc. SPIE, Vol. 9908, Ground-based
and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy
VI, 99080O
Guyon, O. 2004, ApJ, 615, 562,
doi: 10.1086/423980
-- . 2005, ApJ, 629, 592, doi: 10.1086/431209
Hinkley, S., Oppenheimer, B. R., Soummer, R.,
et al. 2007, ApJ, 654, 633, doi: 10.1086/509063
Hodapp, K. 2018, UH-07B, UH Proposal: Subaru
Time
Johnson-Groh, M. 2016, Master's thesis, 111
pages; Canada: University of Victoria (Canada).
http://hdl.handle.net/1828/7440
Jovanovic, N., Guyon, O., Martinache, F., et al.
2015a, ApJL, 813, L24,
doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/813/2/L24
Jovanovic, N., Martinache, F., Guyon, O., et al.
2015b, PASP, 127, 890, doi: 10.1086/682989
20
Gerard, B. L. et al.
Jovanovic, N., Absil, O., Baudoz, P., et al. 2018,
Milli, J., Banas, T., Mouillet, D., et al. 2016, in
in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation
Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 10703,
Adaptive Optics Systems VI, 107031U
Kennedy, G. M., & Wyatt, M. C. 2014, Monthly
Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 444,
3164, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1665
Lafreni`ere, D., Marois, C., Doyon, R., Nadeau, D.,
& Artigau, ´E. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal,
660, 770, doi: 10.1086/513180
Macintosh, B., Graham, J. R., Ingraham, P., et al.
2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of
Science, 111, 12661,
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1304215111
Madurowicz, A., Macintosh, B. A., Ruffio, J.-B.,
et al. 2018, in Society of Photo-Optical
Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference
Series, Vol. 10703, Adaptive Optics Systems VI,
107036E
Marois, C., Correia, C., Galicher, R., et al. 2014,
in Proceedings of the SPIE, Vol. 9148, Adaptive
Optics Systems IV, 91480U
Marois, C., Doyon, R., Racine, R., & Nadeau, D.
2000, Publications of the Astronomical Society
of the Pacific, 112, 91, doi: 10.1086/316492
Marois, C., Lafreni`ere, D., Doyon, R., Macintosh,
B., & Nadeau, D. 2006a, The Astrophysical
Journal, 641, 556, doi: 10.1086/500401
Marois, C., Lafreni`ere, D., Macintosh, B., &
Doyon, R. 2006b, The Astrophysical Journal,
647, 612, doi: 10.1086/505191
Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation
Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9909,
Adaptive Optics Systems V, 99094Z
Minowa, Y., Hayano, Y., Oya, S., et al. 2010, in
Proc. SPIE, Vol. 7736, Adaptive Optics Systems
II, 77363N
Nielsen, E. L., De Rosa, R. J., Macintosh, B.,
et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1904.05358.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.05358
Racine, R., Walker, G. A. H., Nadeau, D., Doyon,
R., & Marois, C. 1999, Publications of the
Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 111, 587,
doi: 10.1086/316367
Rich, E. A., Wisniewski, J. P., Currie, T., et al.
2018, ArXiv e-prints.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.07785
Rosenthal, E. D., Gurwell, M. A., & Ho, P. T. P.
1996, Nature, 384, 243, doi: 10.1038/384243a0
Sauvage, J.-F., Mugnier, L., Paul, B., &
Villecroze, R. 2012, Optics Letters, 37, 4808,
doi: 10.1364/OL.37.004808
Serabyn, E., Wallace, J. K., & Mawet, D. 2011,
ApOpt, 50, 5453, doi: 10.1364/AO.50.005453
Sivaramakrishnan, A., & Oppenheimer, B. R.
2006, The Astrophysical Journal, 647, 620,
doi: 10.1086/505192
Soummer, R., Pueyo, L., & Larkin, J. 2012, The
Astrophysical Journal Letters, 755, L28,
doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/755/2/L28
Sparks, W. B., & Ford, H. C. 2002, The
Astrophysical Journal, 578, 543,
doi: 10.1086/342401
Vigan, A., Moutou, C., Langlois, M., et al. 2010,
MNRAS, 407, 71,
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16916.x
Marois, C., Macintosh, B., Soummer, R., Poyneer,
Wang, J. J., Ruffio, J.-B., De Rosa, R. J., et al.
L., & Bauman, B. 2008, in Proc. SPIE, Vol.
7015, Adaptive Optics Systems, 70151T
Marois, C., Macintosh, B., & V´eran, J.-P. 2010, in
Proceedings of the SPIE, Vol. 7736, Adaptive
Optics Systems II, 77361J
2015, pyKLIP: PSF Subtraction for Exoplanets
and Disks, Astrophysics Source Code Library.
http://ascl.net/1506.001
Wyatt, M. C. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 339,
doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110525
|
1903.04507 | 1 | 1903 | 2019-03-11T18:00:18 | Realistic On-The-Fly Outcomes of Planetary Collisions: Machine Learning Applied to Simulations of Giant Impacts | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | Planet formation simulations are capable of directly integrating the evolution of hundreds to thousands of planetary embryos and planetesimals, as they accrete pairwise to become planets. In principle such investigations allow us to better understand the final configuration and geochemistry of the terrestrial planets, as well as to place our solar system in the context of other exosolar systems. These simulations, however, classically prescribe collisions to result in perfect mergers, but computational advances have begun to allow for more complex outcomes to be implemented. Here we apply machine learning to a large but sparse database of giant impact studies, streamlining simulations into a classifier of collision outcomes and a regressor of accretion efficiency. The classifier maps a 4-Dimensional parameter space (target mass, projectile-to-target mass ratio, impact velocity, impact angle) into the four major collision types: merger, "graze-and-merge", "hit-and-run", and disruption. The definition of the four regimes and their boundary is fully data-driven; the results do not suffer from any model assumption in the fitting. The classifier maps the structure of the parameter space and provides insights about the outcome regimes. The regressor is a neural network which is trained to closely mimic the functional relationship between the 4-D space of collision parameters, and a real-variable outcome, the mass of the largest remnant. This work is a prototype of a more complete surrogate model, based on extended sets of simulations ("big data"), that will quickly and reliably predict specific collision outcomes for use in realistic N-body dynamical studies of planetary formation. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph |
Draft version March 13, 2019
Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62
Realistic On-The-Fly Outcomes of Planetary Collisions: Machine Learning Applied to Simulations of Giant Impacts
Saverio Cambioni,1 Erik Asphaug,1 Alexandre Emsenhuber,1 Travis S. J. Gabriel,2 Roberto Furfaro,3 and
Stephen R. Schwartz1
1Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, 1629 E. University Blvd., Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
2School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, 781 E. Terrace Mall, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
3Systems and Industrial Engineering Department, University of Arizona, 1127 E. James E. Rogers Way, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Submitted to ApJ
ABSTRACT
Planet formation simulations are capable of directly integrating the evolution of hundreds to thou-
sands of planetary embryos and planetesimals, as they accrete pairwise to become planets. In principle
such investigations allow us to better understand the final configuration and geochemistry of the ter-
restrial planets, as well as to place our solar system in the context of other exosolar systems. These
simulations, however, classically prescribe collisions to result in perfect mergers, but computational
advances have begun to allow for more complex outcomes to be implemented. Here we apply machine
learning to a large but sparse database of giant impact studies, streamlining simulations into a classi-
fier of collision outcomes and a regressor of accretion efficiency. The classifier maps a 4-Dimensional
parameter space (target mass, projectile-to-target mass ratio, impact velocity, impact angle) into the
four major collision types: merger, "graze-and-merge", "hit-and-run", and disruption. The definition
of the four regimes and their boundary is fully data-driven; the results do not suffer from any model
assumption in the fitting. The classifier maps the structure of the parameter space and provides in-
sights about the outcome regimes. The regressor is a neural network which is trained to closely mimic
the functional relationship between the 4-D space of collision parameters, and a real-variable outcome,
the mass of the largest remnant. This work is a prototype of a more complete surrogate model, based
on extended sets of simulations ("big data"), that will quickly and reliably predict specific collision
outcomes for use in realistic N -body dynamical studies of planetary formation.
Keywords: Planetary systems -- planets and satellites: terrestrial planets -- methods: numerical
1. INTRODUCTION
The idea of giant impacts has gone well beyond Moon
formation (e.g., Hartmann & Davis 1975; Stevenson
1987; Benz et al. 1989; Canup & Asphaug 2001) to give
new understandings of planet formation during the "late
stage", when bodies that are similar in size collide at one
to several times their mutual escape velocity vesc,
(cid:115)
vesc =
2G(MT + MP)
Rcoll
,
(1)
where MT is the mass of the target, MP is the mass
of the projectile and Rcoll = RT + RP is the separa-
Corresponding author: Saverio Cambioni
[email protected]
tion at initial contact (e.g., Wetherill 1985; Asphaug
2010). Supported by increasingly-sophisticated models,
hypotheses have emerged for the giant impact formation
of planets including Mercury (Benz et al. 2007; Asphaug
& Reufer 2014; Chau et al. 2018), Pluto-Charon (e.g.,
Canup 2005, 2011), Haumea (Leinhardt et al. 2010), Ti-
tan (Asphaug & Reufer 2013), and the Moon. In a broad
sense, giant impact events have had a significant role in
determining the final physical properties of rocky/icy
planets.
In N -body dynamical studies, planetary embryos or-
bit the Sun and each giant impact is typically assumed
to be fully accretionary, so that N only decreases in
time. However, perfect merging is known (Chambers
2013) to be a problematic oversimplification of more
complex outcomes, as has been demonstrated by decades
of detailed hydrocode simulations (e.g., Asphaug et al.
2
2006) using methods such as Smoothed-Particle Hydro-
dynamics (SPH) described below. The most common
collision events at the end-stage of terrestrial planet for-
mation in the solar system involve similar-sized bodies
and vcoll/vesc = 1 − 4 (Agnor et al. 1999). Over this
range of mass ratios and impact velocities, collision out-
comes span all the regimes of accretion, erosion, and
"hit-and-run" (Leinhardt & Stewart 2012). Some more
advanced N -body approaches have implemented simple
rules for limiting accretion efficiency (e.g., Chambers
2013), but approximations such as perfect mergers are
still the norm (e.g., O'Brien et al. 2006; Raymond et al.
2009).
One ultimate strategy is to model collisions "on the
fly", e.g., using SPH to model a given impact event while
the N -body evolution is in progress (e.g., Haghighipour
et al. 2017). But in practice this has limitations. In or-
der for a giant impact simulation to run in less than an
hour, a practical limit when the N -body evolution must
wait, the hydrocode resolution is limited to a ∼ 104 par-
ticles, which is only adequate for classifying the most
basic outcomes (Agnor & Asphaug 2004). Then there is
the concern of data reduction. Well-resolved giant im-
pact simulations often generate multiple debris products
(including intact remnants), and these must be identi-
fied and characterized in each output file to be fed back
into the N -body code. These include the projectile "run-
ner" in case of "hit-and-run" (Asphaug et al. 2006),
and other self-gravitating clumps and debris. "Graze-
and-merge" collisions can spin off escaping bodies up to
a third the size of the progenitors (Asphaug & Reufer
2013), and head-on impacts appear to make fields of siz-
able clumps (e.g., Sugiura et al. 2018). Keeping track of
all this requires post-processing analysis of the collision
outcome and increases N , which can stall the evolution.
Ensuring convergence of the debris field requires larger
numbers of particles than a nominal simulation (e.g.,
Genda et al. 2015).
However, a detailed description of the debris field is
neither needed nor desired. Instead, we would prefer a
summary description of the two or three major bodies
emerging from the giant impact, their thermodynamic
and orbital dynamic states, and useful statistics regard-
ing the remaining debris, e.g., their characteristic sizes
and velocity distributions, as well as the overall mass,
momentum and composition. Lastly, it must be recog-
nized that the knowledge of the specific impact prop-
erties (angle of impact relative to spin state of planet,
for example) are in fact completely unknown, so that
running a superb 3-D simulation of a specified giant im-
pact is misplaced effort, unless results can be generalized
in some way. Our approach is to use high-fidelity SPH
calculations as a training dataset, beginning with the
impact simulations published by Reufer (2011) that is
also the basis for Gabriel et al. (in rev.), who develop a
forward-functional model from the same dataset.
We use SPH to model giant impacts on planetary bod-
ies such as the Moon, Mercury and Mars (e.g., Asphaug
& Reufer 2014; Asphaug et al. 2015; Reufer et al. 2012).
Each SPH outcome is a complex N -Dimensional state
(consolidated planets, clumps, unconsolidated ejecta,
and their thermodynamic states and other characteris-
tics) that requires detailed analysis. Giant impacts cover
a large range of input parameters, and are intrinsically
three-dimensional events. As an example, a colliding
pair of planets is represented by masses M1 and M2,
their impact velocity and angle, target and impactor
spin rate and orientation, plus some assumptions on
their composition and internal structure. Performing 5
realizations of each variable would require nearly 400 000
simulations, just to produce a coarse mapping of the pa-
rameter space. The necessity of a detailed coverage of
the parameter space couples with the requirement of pre-
cise (high-resolution) simulations. Simulations with 106
particles have become standard (e.g., Canup et al. 2013;
Hyodo et al. 2017; Emsenhuber et al. 2018), and runs are
extended to many gravitational times τg = (cid:112)4π/3ρG
(Jutzi & Benz 2017).
We apply machine learning to build an accurate data-
driven model of giant impacts, which does not simply
interpolate the available data, but rather generalizes the
underlying functional relationship between impact prop-
erties and collision outcomes.
It does so as to fit the
available data, but not to over-fit it; that is, to be in-
clusive of the expectation of new data that is yet to be
observed. The data described below is ideal for an initial
study, but is being superceded by much higher fidelity
models; one of the advantages of this approach is that
higher fidelity data can be added to lower fidelity data
in a weighted manner as they become available.
We present two distinct machine-learned response
functions for collisions in the gravity regime: a classifier
of collision types and a regressor of accretion efficiency.
These functional models -- compact algorithms -- map
the outcome of a giant impact (post-collision end state)
into a 4-Dimensional parameter space, i.e., mass of tar-
get, projectile-to-target mass ratio, impact velocity and
impact angle. The training is performed on existing gi-
ant impact simulations between similar-size differenti-
ated chondritic bodies. The resulting surrogate collision
models give a reliable result to within a known degree of
confidence and at a highly reduced computational time
(with respect to full giant impact simulations, i.e., on the
order of seconds on a single computing thread). There-
fore, they are designed to apply especially well to N -
body evolution calculations and to constrain pre-impact
dynamical conditions from hypothesized post-collision
scenario (Jackson et al. 2018).
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2.1 we
describe the available dataset. In Section 2.2 we provide
an introduction to machine learning, with a focus on
the two distinct algorithms used to train the classifier of
collision types and the regressor of accretion efficiency:
Support Vector Machine (Section 2.2.1) and Neural Net-
work (Section 2.2.2), respectively. In Sections 3 and 4
we present and discuss the predictions by the trained
algorithms regarding the post-collision end states and
the characterization of the parameter space. Finally, we
discuss the potentialities of the methodology and future
work/application in Section 5.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Dataset
In this study, we use SPH simulations from Reufer
(2011). Completed at ∼ 200 000-particle resolution, the
dataset spans a wide range of parameters: target mass,
mass ratio (projectile/target), impact angle, and impact
velocity. The bodies are similar in size and initially non-
rotating. They are differentiated with a chondritic com-
position of 30% iron and 70% silicate. The values for the
first two parameters that are present in the dataset are
provided in Table 1. For each pair, more than 100 runs
with different impact velocity and angle are performed,
ranging between 0 and 90◦, and 1 to 4 times the mutual
escape velocity, respectively (top-left and top-right pan-
els of Figure 1). These conditions are the most relevant
to the late-stage planet formation (Stewart & Leinhardt
2012; Chambers 2013). Among the impact parameters,
we do not include the initial spin rates, which require
three additional variables for each of the bodies (one for
the magnitude and two for the orientation). The target
and impactor spin rates, however, have been found to
be relevant for the overall impact outcome (e.g., Canup
2005, 2011); we intend to include this parameter in fu-
ture machine learning applications.
The collisions in our dataset are modeled using the
SPH technique.
SPH is a physically-based hydro-
dynamical model that uses a Lagragian description,
which is suited for collision modeling, where a large
range of densities is expected; no grid is required, in con-
trast with Eulerian methods. Quantities are obtained
by interpolating over ∼ 50−100 neighbor particles using
a kernel function -- in this case a β-spline (Monaghan &
Lattanzio 1985). Spatial derivatives are retrieved using
the derivative of the kernel, so that no grid is required.
Time evolution is provided by Euler's equations: mass
3
Figure 1. Top-left and top-right panels: frequency distribu-
tions of input impact angle θcoll and velocity vcoll/vesc, re-
spectively; the values for the other two input parameters that
are present in the dataset -- target mass and mass ratio (pro-
jectile/target) -- are provided in Table 1. Bottom-left panel:
frequency distribution of the collision classes as labelled in
the classification task (Sections 2.2.1 and 3.1); on the x-axis,
"HnR" refers to the simulations labelled as "hit-and-run"
cases, "GnM" refers to the "graze-and-merge" cases, and
"Disr." refers to the "disruption" cases. Bottom-right panel:
frequency distribution of accretion efficiency values -- Equa-
tion 11 -- which are used in the regression task (Sections
2.2.2 and 3.2). Simulations from Reufer (2011). Details on
the database of simulations and detailed physical analysis
are provided in Gabriel et al. (in rev.).
conservation to obtain the density, energy conservation
for the internal energy, and momentum conservation
with pressure gradient and self-gravity. An artificial
viscosity is added to resolve shocks as is common in
nearly all SPH implementations in planetary science
(e.g., Monaghan 1992). An equation of state is required
to obtain the pressure from the density and internal
energy; we use M-ANEOS for SiO2 and ANEOS for
iron (Melosh 2007; Thompson & Lauson 1972) -- a com-
mon choice for such studies. Self-gravity is based on
a hierarchical spatial tree (Barnes & Hut 1986), where
contributions from distant regions are estimated using
a multi-pole approximation. The same tree is used to
walk the nearest-neighbor search, a process that occurs
throughout the simulation.
Each simulation begins with the bodies approaching
from several radii away, to allow for tidal deformation to
take place prior to the collision. The initial conditions
are determined assuming a two-body problem so that
4
Target mass [M⊕] Mass ratio (projectile/target)
1
10−1
10−2
0.20, 0.70
0.10, 0.20, 0.35, 0.70
0.20, 0.70
Table 1. Pairs of target masses and projectile-to-target
mass ratio present in the collisions dataset from Reufer
(2011); Gabriel et al. (in rev.). For each pair, more than
100 runs with different impact velocity and angle are per-
formed, ranging between 0 and 90◦, and 1 to 4 times the
mutual escape velocity, respectively (Figure 1).
the velocity and angle at initial contact follow the pre-
scribed values. The simulations are evolved for 50τcoll
past initial contact, with τcoll being the collision time
scale defined as
τcoll =
2Rcoll
vcoll
,
(2)
where vcoll is the impact velocity and Rcoll = RT + RP
is the separation at initial contact. The indexes T and
P refer to the target and projectile respectively. Once
the simulation has finished, the resulting bodies are
found using the following iterative algorithm: particles
pairs are iterated over, starting with the ones that have
the lowest gravitational potential energy, and checked
whether the pair is bound. If a pair is bound, then a
new clump is started, and the iteration continues check-
ing particles against the new clump. For each particle
added, the iteration is repeated until no further particle
is found to be bound to the clump. This procedure is
also used to compute the mass of the largest remnant
of the collisions. Details on the database of simulations
and detailed physical analysis are provided in Gabriel
et al. (in rev.). Snapshots of the movie rendering of
these simulations are shown in Figure 2.
The simulations in the dataset use SPH in the origi-
nal, fluid mode, where the equation of motion is derived
only from the pressure gradient (e.g., Monaghan 1992)
and self-gravity. This is appropriate when the stresses
of gravity exceed the possible mechanical strengths, and
for this reason the existing dataset has its lower limit
at 1400 km diameters (the so-called "gravity regime").
For bodies 100 -- 1000 km in diameter, it has been shown
that friction (e.g. Jutzi 2015) and strength (Emsenhu-
ber et al. 2018) are important, with the potential to
challenge our ideas for the origin of moons and embryos
during the late stage of planet formation. For super-
Earth and Neptune-mass bodies (10 000 km and larger),
the dominant variables are thermodynamic processes,
shocks and gravity (Marcus et al. 2009, 2010b; Liu et al.
2015; Kegerreis et al. 2018a). For this work we limit
ourselves to Earth-sized planets and smaller, because a
Figure 2. Different combinations of the 4 impact properties
(predictors: mass of the target, projectile-to-target mass ra-
tio, impact angle, impact velocity) lead to different collision
outcomes (responses). The SPH codes allow easy visualiza-
tion of the results in form of short clips. As an example, the
top panel of the figure shows the initial state of the simu-
lation (target and impactor before the collision). The other
panels show the collision type for various impact velocities
and angles. From top to the bottom: a merging event, re-
sulting from a head-on collision at low impact velocity; a
"graze-and-merge" event, resulting from a collision at the
most probable impact angle (45◦, Shoemaker 1962) and low
impact velocity; a "hit-and-run" event, resulting from a colli-
sion at an impact angle of 45◦ and moderate impact velocity;
a disruptive event, resulting from a head-on collision at high
impact velocity. The time after the collision (in hours) is
reported at the bottom left of each frame. Simulations from
Reufer (2011). Details on the database of simulations and
detailed physical analysis are provided in Gabriel et al. (in
rev.).
sufficiently large database for super-Earth and Neptune-
sized collisions is not reported in the literature.
2.2. Machine Learning
Machine Learning (ML) is a subfield of data analysis
that lies at the cornerstone between statistical meth-
ods and computer science as well as at the core of
artificial intelligence. Originally conceived to address
the question of how to build computers that can au-
tonomously improve through direct experience, ML en-
ables machines to learn features and trends from the
available data. Over the past few years, encouraged by
advancements in parallel computing technologies (e.g.,
Graphic Processing Units, GPUs), availability of mas-
sive labeled data as well as breakthrough in understand-
ing of deep neural networks, there has been an explosion
of ML algorithms that can accurately process images for
classification and regression tasks, e.g., image and video
recognition (Krizhevsky et al. 2012), natural language
processing (Socher et al. 2012), speech recognition (Hin-
ton et al. 2012). State-of-the-art ML techniques allow
for several advantages: they can streamline the genera-
tion of data sets to most efficiently explore regions of in-
terest in a large parameter space; and they can perform
accurate mappings of initial conditions and end-states,
with associated probabilities, taking into account a high-
dimensional parameter space. This is in contrast to hu-
man operators that are often limited to a mostly 2-D
understanding of the data. ML schemes take advantage
of this 'big data problem' to spot new and sometimes
unexpected correlations.
ML techniques are divided into supervised (or predic-
tive) and unsupervised (or descriptive) methods. Super-
vised methods rely on a training set of data, both with
features/predictors and labels, that is known with some
level of confidence. As an example, in a giant impact,
a set of predictors (e.g., impact angle, impact velocity,
mass of the target) results into a collision outcome, such
as merger or disruption (the label). In supervised learn-
ing, the dataset is split into training samples, validation
samples (data used to measure generalization capability
of the algorithm), and testing samples (data that do not
affect training and are used as an independent measure
of performance during and after training). By contrast,
unsupervised methods do not label the data directly into
classes but rather attempt to find patterns and trends
underlying in the data. Usually, such algorithms (e.g.,
K-mean, Ahmad & Dey 2007) require an initial assump-
tion on the data (e.g., number of clusters), and results
heavily depend on such initial assumptions.
We divide the algorithms as metric and non-metric
depending on their specific operating principles. Metric
5
algorithms employ measures of similarities and distances
to the predictors whereas non-metric algorithms do not.
Among the metric-based algorithms, we consider Sup-
port Vector Machines (SVM, Hearst et al. 1998) which
uses a kernel to compute the inner product of all pairs
of data in the feature space and implicitly projects the
data in a higher dimensional space where such data
are linearly separable; and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN,
Duda et al. 2012), which uses a suitable similarity func-
tion/distance to evaluate the closeness of a new sample
to samples stored in memory. Among the non-metric
algorithms, we consider Decision Trees (DT, Safavian
& Landgrebe 1991), which construct a tree structure
and explore nodes and leaves for both classification and
regression; and Random Forest (Breiman 2001), which
is an ensemble of multiple DT, where each tree is con-
structed by sampling a random set of attributes from
the data. Each tree performs regression via a mean pre-
diction and classification via majority voting. Ensem-
ble methods (e.g., Bootstrap Aggregation or Bagging,
Breiman 1996), where an ensemble of weak learners are
combined to produce a stronger learner, are considered
for both regression and classification tasks.
2.2.1. Classification task: Support Vector Machine
In SPH, the continuous fluid is represented as a La-
grangian set of particles that move with the flow; this
allows easy visualization and supports analytical deduc-
tions (Asphaug et al. 2015, and references therein). We
digest the dataset for the classifier by defining the qual-
itative outcome of each giant impact simulation accord-
ing to four distinct classes of responses: merging, disrup-
tion, "graze-and-merge", "hit-and-run" (e.g. Asphaug
et al. 2006, 2015; Stewart & Leinhardt 2009), Figure
2.
In our classification, we distinguish between merg-
ing and "graze-and-merge" scenarios. The latter is a
transient evolution that would eventually lead the pro-
jectile to merge with the target, but escaping bodies up
to a third of the size of the progenitors can be spin off
during the collision (Asphaug & Reufer 2013). The out-
come of the simulations (response, or class) is associated
to four impact parameters (predictors): mass of the tar-
get, projectile-to-target mass ratio, impact angle, and
impact velocity. The dataset has entries:
{(MT, γ, θcoll, vcoll/vesc); class}
(3)
where MT is the mass of the target, γ = MP/MT is the
projectile-to-target mass ratio (MP being the mass of
the projectile), θcoll is the impact angle and vcoll is the
collision velocity normalized to the mutual escape veloc-
ity vesc (Equation 1). The matching between predictors
and response is done during one of our "movie days":
6
four co-authors watched short movie clips of the simu-
lations and, based on this visualization, agreed on the
outcome of the simulations (class). When dealing with
a complicated problem, a group of experts with varied
experience in the same area have a higher probability
of reaching a satisfactory solution than a single expert
(Baruque & Corchado 2010). Labeling error, however,
can still occur for several reasons, including subjectivity,
data-entry error, or inadequacy of the information used
to label each entry. Domains in which experts disagree
are natural places for subjective labeling errors (Brodley
& Friedl 1999, and references therein). To mitigate mis-
labeling and its negative effect on the performance of the
classifier, the labeling of the dataset is performed by the
domain experts with a majority vote. Taking a majority
over many hypotheses, all of which proposed by different
experts, has the effect to reduce the random variability
of the labels (Baruque & Corchado 2010). More ad-
vanced approaches to labeling (e.g., crowd-sourcing or
weighted-voting, Rodrigues et al. 2013) or to labeling
error mitigation (e.g., ensemble learning, Zhang & Ma
2012) are also possible, but they are beyond the scope
of this pilot study.
An excerpt of the labelled data is reported in Table
2. The dataset for the classification task is published
in its entirety in the machine-readable format. Among
the available schemes, we selected a multi-class Support
Vector Machine (SVM, Hearst et al. 1998) as the al-
gorithm achieving the highest validation for the classi-
fication task (see Section 3.1). SVMs were introduced
by Boser, Guyon and Vapnik (Boser et al. 1992), and
became very popular because of their large success at
the handwritten digit recognition task. SVMs are ma-
chine learning algorithms that can discriminate between
different classes given input data. They are considered
primary examples of the so-called "kernel methods".
Consider a set of given training vectors xi ∈ Rn, i =
1, ...., l that belong to two classes, as well as a class in-
dicator vector y ∈ Rl such that yi ∈ [−1, 1]. The basic
SVM algorithm solves the following primal optimization
problem:
minw,b,η
1
2
wT w + C
subject to the following constraints:
l(cid:88)
i=1
ηi
(4)
yi(wT φ(xi) + b) ≥ 1 − ηi, ηi ≥ 0
(5)
Here, φ(xi) maps the training vectors xi into a higher-
dimensional space. C ≥ 0 is the Tikhonov regularization
parameter. Generally, the vector variable w lives in a
l(cid:88)
high dimensional space. Thus, one equivalently solves
the following dual problem:
minα
1
2
αT Qα − eT α
(6)
subject to:
yT α = 0,
0 ≤ αi ≤ 0,
i = 1, ..., l
(7)
Here, e = [1, ...., 1]T is a vector comprising all ones,
Q is an l × l positive semi-definite matrix where Qi,j =
yiyjK(xi, xi). The kernel function K(·,·) is defined as
K(xi, xi) = φ(xi)T φ(xi). After the optimization prob-
lem is solved via the primal-dual relationship, the opti-
mal vector w satisfies the following relationship:
w =
yiαiφ(xi)
(8)
i=1
Importantly, the decision (discriminative) function for
the binary classification problem is mathematically de-
scribed as:
l(cid:88)
sgn(wT φ(x) + b) = sgn(
i=1
yiαiK(xi, x) + b)
(9)
This formulation holds when the problem has nonlin-
ear decision surfaces, as the input vector x is substituted
by a properly selected mapping function φ that projects
the training data into a suitable feature space (Shashua
2009). The choice of the function φ is done using k−fold
cross-validation, which subdivides the training set in k
subsets and train the classifier (i.e., solve the primal-
dual optimization problem) using only (k − 1) subsets.
The validation accuracy (i.e., percentage of correct clas-
sification) is computed -- after training -- on the k−th
subset. The procedure is repeated several times; the av-
erage validation accuracy is used to compare different
schemes with different hyperparameters (i.e., the value
of k and the function φ). The model with the highest
validation accuracy is adopted.
Once the SVM is trained and validated, its perfor-
mance is assessed by means of a confusion matrix com-
puted on a testing set. The confusion matrix shows the
degree to which the classifier is confused when it makes
predictions; each row represents the instances in a pre-
dicted class while each column represents the instances
in an actual class (Ting 2010). As an example, for the
binary sub-problem of classification between "graze-and-
merge" (GnM) and "hit-and-run" (HnR), the confusion
matrix has the form:
7
Target mass [M⊕] Mass ratio (projectile/target)
Impact angle
Impact velocity [vesc]
Collision class
1
1
1
1
10−1
10−1
10−1
10−1
0.70
0.70
0.70
0.70
0.70
0.70
0.70
0.70
89.5
89.5
22.5
22.5
30.0
30.0
22.5
22.5
1.30
1.05
1.00
4.00
1.50
1.40
1.00
4.00
"hit-and-run" (flag: 1)
"graze-and-merge" (flag: 2)
merging (flag: 3)
disruption (flag: 4)
"hit-and-run" (flag: 1)
"graze-and-merge" (flag: 2)
merging (flag: 3)
disruption (flag: 4)
Note -- Table 2 is published in its entirety in the machine-readable format. A portion is shown here for guidance regarding its
form and content.
Table 2. Excerpt of the labelled data for the classification task. The elements in columns first to fourth are the predictors
(pre-impact conditions): MT ∈ [10−2, 1] M⊕; γ = MP/MT ∈ [0.2, 0.7]; θcoll ∈ [0, 90]; vcoll/vesc ∈ [1, 4]. The elements in
the fifth column are the responses (type of collision outcome). Among the responses, "hit-and-run" cases are coded as #1;
"graze-and-merge" cases are coded as #2; merging cases are coded as #3; disruptive cases are coded as #4.
Actual: HnR Actual: GnM
Predicted: HnR
Predicted: GnM
a
c
b
d
The diagonal elements are the instances of correct
classifications, while the off-diagonal values account for
misclassifications.
In this example, the total number
of actual "hit-and-run" events is 'a + c'; after training,
the SVM classifies correctly 'a' events and misclassify 'c'
events as "graze-and-merge". The accuracy of the clas-
sifier is computed as the percentages of true positives
(correct predictions) over total number of sample:
AC [%] =
a + d
a + b + c + d
× 100
(10)
Classification problems with a number of classes
greater than 2 are decomposed into multiple binary
classification problems, according to different trans-
formation techniques (e.g., one-vs-one and one-vs-rest
strategies, Bishop 2006). The choice of a specific tech-
nique is also part of hyperparameter optimization.
2.2.2. Regression task: Neural Networks
Whereas classifiers are able to handle discrete, quali-
tative responses, a regressor is a surrogate model able to
mimic the "parent" SPH input-output function to pre-
dict continuous (real-variable) outputs given the input
parameters (predictors), Figure 3. This scheme provides
a synthesis of the collision outcome in terms of a set of
output properties of interests (e.g., mass of the largest
remnants, their post-collision orbital elements, etc.), by
learning from large planetary formation datasets of col-
lision. Running the surrogate model drastically reduces
the computational time with respect to full SPH simu-
lations (from hours to seconds). We design a surrogate
model for the prediction of accretion efficiency (i.e., the
mass of the largest remnant of the collision) at several
times the collision timescale, Equation (2). After this
time, pressure and temperature gradient forces are no
longer acting and the resulting scenario (largest rem-
nants and their orbital properties) can be treated using
N -body integrator rather than hydrocodes. We use the
definition of accretion efficiency by Asphaug (2010):
ξ =
(MLR − MT)
MP
(11)
where MLR is the mass of the largest remnant, MT is the
mass of the target body and MP is the mass of the pro-
jectile. For each simulation in our dataset, the largest
remnants is identified as discussed in Section 2.1. A
summary of the data is reported in Table 3. The dataset
for the regression task is published in its entirety in the
machine-readable format.
This effort of the work is entirely independent from
the classification of Section 3.1. For this task, a Neural
Network (NN) is trained, validated and tested to replace
the more computationally expensive "parent" numerical
models, e.g., the full SPH simulation, in the prediction
of accretion efficiency. NNs are able to learn (i.e., im-
prove the performance of a specific tasks) from data, by
modeling the functional relationship between inputs and
outputs, which is exemplified by labeled data. NNs con-
sist of many mathematical units called neurons, which
communicate in a parallel fashion through weights that
represent the strength of the corresponding synapses.
Neurons are the basic processing units for the network
and are characterized by an activation function h(·). Ad-
ditive nodes with activation functions have the following
structure:
G(ai, bi, x) = h(aT
i x + bi)
(12)
8
Target mass [M⊕] Mass ratio (projectile/target)
Impact angle
Impact velocity [vesc] Accretion efficiency (Eq. 11)
1
1
1
10−1
10−1
10−1
10−2
0.70
0.70
0.70
0.70
0.20
0.35
0.70
52.5
22.5
45.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
60.0
1.15
3.00
1.30
1.40
3.50
3.50
1.70
0.02
-0.58
0.02
0.90
-1.52
-1.25
0.00
Note -- Table 3 is published in its entirety in the machine-readable format. A portion is shown here for guidance regarding its
form and content.
Table 3. Excerpt of the data for the regression task. The elements in columns first to fourth are the predictors (pre-impact
conditions): MT ∈ [10−2, 1] M⊕; γ = MP/MT ∈ [0.2, 0.7]; θcoll ∈ [0, 90]; vcoll/vesc ∈ [1, 4]. The elements in the fifth column
are the responses (accretion efficiency ξ) as post-processed by Gabriel et al. (in rev.).
number of neurons S. The overall process begins with a
summation of each input with the correspondent weights
(synapses) and then further processing by an activation
function. In regression problems, the overall NN output
function is typically represented as follows:
S(cid:88)
S(cid:88)
N(cid:88)
i=1
fS(x) =
βihi(x) =
βiG(ai, bi, x)
(14)
i=1
i=1
where x ∈ Rd and βi ∈ Rm. The weights ai an bi-
ases bi are determined during the training process which
implies minimization of a loss function. For regression
problems, the typical loss function is the Mean Square
Error (MSE), i.e.:
M SE(ai, bi) =
1
N
(fS(xi) − yi)2
(15)
where {x, y}i is the associated training set of size N .
In this paper, the regressor is trained, validated and
tested on data of the type:
{(MT, γ, θcoll, vcoll/vesc); ξ}
(16)
while the composition is kept as parameter. The dataset
is subdivided in training, validation and testing sub-
sets, typically in proportion 70%-15%-15%. Network
training is performed using the training set and involves
the fitting of the network parameters (weight ai and bi-
ases bi) via minimization of the loss function (Equation
15). Common approach to training involves backprop-
agation or Stochastic Gradient Descent (Schmidhuber
2015). A training step (or epoch) consists in a round
of predictions for the predictors xi in the training set,
followed by backpropagation of the residuals between
targets and prediction and update of weights ai that re-
duce the MSE. At each epoch, the performance of the
network (and progress toward a successful training) is
Figure 3. A surrogate model (e.g, neural network) is able
to generalize the functional relationship y = f (x) between
real-variable input x (impact conditions, right column) and
outputs y (collision outcomes, left column). Training oc-
curs on N data of the type: {x; y}i = {predictor; label}i,
i = 1, ..., N . Examples of impact conditions (predictors) and
outcomes (labels) are shown in the right and left columns,
respectively.
In this pilot study, we train a neural net-
work to associate four impact conditions (mass of the target,
projectile-to-target mass ratio, impact angle, impact veloc-
ity) to accretion efficiency (or mass of the largest remnant,
Equation 11).
where ai ∈ Rm and bi ∈ R. A common activation
function for shallow neural networks is the tanh-sigmoid
function
h(s) =
2
1 + exp(−2s)
− 1
(13)
For deeper architectures, such as Convolutional Neu-
ral Network (CNN, Krizhevsky et al. 2012), other acti-
vation functions (e.g., ReLu, Rectified Linear Unit) are
more commonly used. Neurons are organized by layers;
for this application, we adopt a shallow network com-
prising one input layer, one hidden layer and an output
layer. The hidden layer is assumed to have a specified
evaluated in terms of Mean Square Error, MSE, Equa-
tion 15, which is expected to decrease as the number of
epochs increases, thus indicating progressive improve-
ment in the performance (i.e., learning).
Both the validation and testing sets are employed to
protect against overfitting of the training set (Bishop
et al. 1995). The training process is not a simple in-
terpolation of the training set, but rather it involves
the search for families of parametric functions (i.e., the
neural network) that globally fit the data (generaliza-
tion). The validation procedure consists in the search of
those network hyperparameters (e.g., the learning rate
or numbers of hidden neurons, which are not learned
during training) that minimize the MSE on the valida-
tion set. In addition to help protecting against overfit-
ting, the testing set is used for an independent assess-
ment of the generalization capabilities of the network,
i.e., the behavior of the MSE on an unseen ensemble of
data. Properly trained networks ensure that the data
in the validation and the testing sets follow the same
probability distribution of the data in the training set.
At every training epoch, the MSE for validation and
testing is computed; the training is completed when the
MSE on the validation set does not further decrease for
6 consecutive training epochs.
In addition to the MSE, the overall process is evalu-
ated also in terms of regression value R, which measures
the degree of correlation between outputs and targets;
this quantity is the analogous of the SVM classification
accuracy for real-variable data. The regression value R
is a non-dimensional quantity and allows comparing the
performance of different approaches to the problem (e.g.,
data-driven approach versus data interpolation) with re-
spect to the data, at testing. An optimal result shows
low MSE values (i.e., close to zero) and a high degree
of correlation between predictions and targets (i.e., a R
value close to 100%) on the testing set.
3. RESULTS
In the following two sections, the trained response
functions (classifier of collision types and regressor of
accretion efficiency) are presented. We also discuss their
predicting performance with respect to the labels of the
entries in the datasets.
3.1. Classifier of collision outcomes
The classifier of collision outcomes maps the four im-
pact properties (mass of the target, projectile-to-target
mass ratio, impact angle, impact velocity) into one of the
following types of collisions: merging, disruption, "hit-
and-run", "graze-and-merge". The classifier is trained,
cross-validated and tested as discussed in Section 2.2.1.
9
The ensemble of 769 labelled SPH simulations in Table 2
is split in a training dataset (90%) and a testing dataset
(10%) via random sampling without replacement. The
training set is used for training the network with 10-
fold cross-validation, which allows performing hyperpa-
rameter optimization for what concerns the best kernel
feature parametrization. We find that a quadratic ker-
nel (K = φT φ = (kT x + m)2) achieves the best cross-
validation accuracy (91.0%).
The performance of the classifier, in terms of its con-
fusion matrix, is shown in Figure 4, left panel. The
performance is evaluated on the testing set, correspond-
ing to 77 entries, which was not used for training and
cross-validation. Testing the algorithm on this sepa-
rate dataset provides an independent, additional assess-
ment of the performance of the classifier on unseen data.
We achieve an overall accuracy above 93% at testing.
Certain regimes, however, are characterized by more
misclassifications (e.g., disruption versus merging) than
others (e.g., "hit-and-run"). Those classes characterized
by high false negative rates prevent the classifier from
achieving 100% accuracy at testing (i.e., a fully diagonal
confusion matrix); this is found to be indicative of "con-
fusion" along the decision boundaries between regimes,
as we address in more details in Section 4.2 (Figure 7,
left panel).
The classifier is intrinsically a 4-D scheme, with many
dimensions as the number of predictors (impact proper-
ties). The algorithm describes the outcome in parameter
space by means of decision hyper-surfaces, which mark
the transition between different regimes. To better ap-
preciate these features, the parameter space can be sec-
tioned in 2-D slices; one example of these map is in Fig-
ure 4, right panel, for a mass of the target MT = 0.1 M⊕
and similar-mass projectile (γ = MP/MT = 0.7). The
collision type is mapped into a space of collision velocity
(in units of mutual escape velocity) and impact angle.
We recognize 4 distinct collision regimes, whose decision
boundaries are the traces of the decision hyper-surfaces
suggested by the classifier. Each regime is a "phase" in
which the collision outcome is qualitative similar, that
is, a scaling law is expected to apply.
3.2. Regressor of accretion efficiency
The neural network has 4 input neurons (as many as
the impact properties), one hidden layer, and one output
layer which predicts accretion efficiency. The dataset of
Table 3 is composed by 810 simulations; their predic-
tors (i.e. the impact properties) are internally scaled in
a min-max procedure. The training is performed using
the Levemberg - Marquardt algorithm (Demuth et al.
2014) on 70% of the overall dataset. The rest of the
10
Figure 4. Left panel: Confusion matrix of the 4-D classifier, quantifying the degree of accuracy of the classification on the
testing set. The elements on the diagonal of the confusion matrix represents those instances that have been correctly classified
by the SVM (true positives). Conversely, each extra-diagonal element represents the number of mis-classifications with respect
the SPH data (i.e., the labels). The number of misclassifications is added along each column to compute the false negative rates.
Overall, we achieve a true positive rate of 91.4% on the "hit-and-run" (HnR) class, 95.5% for "graze-and-merge" (GnM) class,
87.5% for the merge class and 100.0% for the disruption class. The confusion matrix is close to be fully diagonal; the accuracy
-- computed as the mean value of the true positives over the whole population, Equation (10) -- is above 93%. Right panel:
decision boundaries for the collision type, as predicted by the classifier for a mass of the target MT = 0.1 M⊕ and a mass ratio
between the projectile and the target γ = 0.7. The impact velocity spans in a range between 1 to 4 times the mutual escape
velocity (Equation 1) while the impact angle ranges from head-on to grazing configurations.
data is split between a validation set (15%) and a test-
ing set (15%). The dataset is split via random sampling
without replacement to assure that the data in the three
sets follow the same probability distribution. Figure 5,
left panel, shows learning dynamics in terms of the evo-
lution of the MSE for training, validation and testing, at
different epochs of training procedure. For the hidden
layer, the choice of 10 hidden neurons gives the lowest
MSE at validation. The testing MSE converges to an
error level of about 0.04. This value is an estimate of
the global accretion efficiency error, as it quantifies the
(squared) residual between the values predicted by the
regressor and the values of accretion efficiency of the
SPH data in the testing set. The training error is also
0.04, while the validation error is about 0.03. Figure
5, right panel, shows the correlation index at the end
of the training procedure, whose value is above 95% on
testing.
As for the classifier of collision outcome, the regressor
maps accretion efficiency in a 4-D parameter space. For
a mass of the target MT = 0.1 M⊕ and similar-mass pro-
jectile (γ = MP/MT = 0.7), Figure 6, left panel, shows
a 2-D map (slice of the parameter space) of accretion
efficiency in a plane of impact velocity (in units of mu-
tual escape velocity) and impact angle. The grid has a
step of 0.01◦ along the impact angle axis (θcoll) and 0.01
along the velocity axis (vcoll/vesc). Accretion efficiency
is color-coded such that the outcome varies from perfect
merging (dark blue) to partial accretion (light blue) to
partial erosion to disruption (redder colors and black for
ξ ≤ −1). The corner of the face that has the smallest
indices determines the constant color of each mesh face.
Catastrophic disruption is achieved when the mass of the
largest remnant is less or equal to the half of the total
mass of the system (MT +MP). Given that MP = γMT,
catastrophic disruption is characterized by an accretion
efficiency equal or less than ξD = 0.5 − 0.5 γ, with dis-
ruption threshold (ξD = −0.21 for γ = 0.7).
4. DISCUSSION
High-resolution SPH simulations have been used to
train, validate and test a classifier of collision type (Sec-
tion 3.1) and a regressor of accretion efficiency (Sec-
11
Figure 5. Left panel: evolution of the Mean Square Error (MSE) for training, testing and validation, for increasing epochs of
training. When validation is concluded, the average plateau value of the testing MSE is 0.04. This quantifies the global uncer-
tainty of the surrogate model in mimicking the "parent" numerical model, i.e., the SPH simulations. Right panel: correlation
between predictions and target, and overall fitting with respect to an expected 1:1 line. The regression index R is about 96%
(average), close to the optimal value of 100%.
tion 3.2). Together with the prediction of the type of
collision (e.g., merging versus disruption), real-variable
collision outcomes (e.g., mass of the larges remnants,
their post-collision orbits) are needed to realistically
simulate collisions in an N-body dynamical evolution.
The regression of such quantities can be done by means
of a neural network able to map pre-impact conditions
into outcomes (Figure 3).
In this work we present a
first machine-learned regressor that predicts the accre-
tion efficiency at many times the collision timescale --
Equation (2).
The two surrogate collision models (classifier and re-
gressor) describe a 4-D parameter space in terms of mass
of the target, projectile-to-target mass ratio, impact ve-
locity and impact angle. Interpretation by the human
operator, however, is preferably done on a 2-D section
("slice") of the 4-D parameter space. As an example,
SVM decision boundaries and accretion efficiency are
predicted for MT = 0.1 M⊕ and γ = MP/MT = 0.7
in Figure 4, right panel, and Figure 6, left panel, re-
spectively. The map of the accretion efficiency unveils
a richer background scenario in regions were the col-
lision outcome seemed homogeneous according to the
classifier. "Graze-and-merge" and merging are some-
what inefficient in delivering mass to the target, as a
portion of the projectile as high as 50% can escape
accretion. Because of its typical grazing nature, the
"hit-and-run" regime is characterized by accretion ef-
ficiency close to 0, within the error associated with
the training. At the most probable impact angle (i.e.,
45◦, Shoemaker 1962), however, lower-energy "hit-and-
run" cases are indistinguishable from partially-accreting
"graze-and-merge" events, while partial erosion starts
to dominate above vcoll/vesc ∼ 2. Overall, the tar-
get is likely to be slightly eroded in the "hit-and-run"
regime, but the second largest remnant (i.e., the sur-
viving projectile) underwent the highest collision and
tidal stresses, as the energy of the impact is partitioned
equally in the two bodies.
4.1. Comparison with scaling laws
Predicting the outcome of a giant impact without per-
forming a full hydrodynamics simulation has already
been the subject of multiple studies leading to the for-
mulation of scaling laws (e.g., Davis & Ryan 1990; Benz
& Asphaug 1999; Leinhardt & Stewart 2012). A scaling
law is an analytic relationship between impact proper-
ties (e.g., mass ratio, impact angle, and impact velocity)
and its outcome for any collision in a physical regime
(e.g, between gravity-dominated bodies), assuming in-
variance with respect to one property, usually the mass
of the target. Hydrodynamical simulations are used to
fit the parameters of the relationship, and, ideally, ac-
count for the transition between the different regimes.
12
Figure 6. Left panel: map of accretion efficiency -- Equation (11) -- as predicted by the neural network (Section 3.2). Right
panel: map of collision outcome and accretion efficiency generated using the scaling laws proposed by Stewart & Leinhardt
(2012), for the same combination of mass of the target and mass of the projectile, using the values c(cid:63) = 1.9 and ¯µ = 0.36, which
were fit to hydrodynamic planets
. Impact velocity (y axis) ranges between 1 to 4 vesc, impact angle (x axis) ranges from head-on to grazing, MT = 0.1 M⊕, and
γ = MP/MT = 0.7. The grid was sampled in steps of 0.01◦ and 0.01vesc; color for each mesh face is dictated by the vertex with
the smallest index. Accretion efficiency shows a rich range of outcomes, which includes transitions from accretion (cooler
colors) to disruption (warmer/black colors), to hit-and-run (almost net-zero accretion; white colors).
Here, we compare our results with one such law by
Leinhardt & Stewart (2012). They proposed scaling the
collisions according to the ratio between the specific im-
pact energy, and the catastrophic disruption threshold
Q∗
RD -- the specific energy required to disperse half the
total colliding mass (for non-grazing collision). The ref-
erence specific energy is first computed for head-on colli-
sions between equal-mass bodies and then corrected for
the mass ratio and impact angle.
The left panel of Figure 6 shows the map of accre-
tion efficiency (predicted using our regressor), again for
MT = 0.1 M⊕ and γ = 0.7. On the right panel of Fig-
ure 6 is the analogous map generated using the scaling
laws for hydrodynamic bodies proposed by Leinhardt
& Stewart (2012). The fit parameters in their model
which are most relevant to our results are c(cid:63) = 1.9± 0.3
and ¯µ = 0.36 ± 0.01 and were thus used to generate the
right panel of Figure 6. Our data-driven approach and
the empirical, physics-based energy scaling by Leinhardt
& Stewart (2012), however, are different in two funda-
mental aspects: 1) the underlying dataset of simulations
that were used for fitting procedures; and 2) the fitting
methodology. Because of these differences, we keep the
comparison between the two results shown in Figure 6
qualitative and aim to highlight similarities and differ-
ences between those.
Leinhardt & Stewart (2012) segregate collisions into
"grazing" and "non-grazing" according to the critical
impact parameter bcrit = sin θcrit = RT/(RT + RP) (As-
phaug 2010) (see vertical line in the right panel of Fig-
ure 6). This relationship, however, was introduced by
Asphaug (2010) as a geometrical guideline and not in-
tended for the purpose of accurately predicting "hit-and-
run" events. The description of the parameter space by
our surrogate models does not show a "hard" transition
between grazing and non-grazing scenarios based on the
critical impact parameter value. We unveil the occur-
rence of "hit-and-run" events at angles lower than the
critical value, discussed further in Gabriel et al. (in rev.).
In the grazing domain (on the right of the critical im-
pact angle), Leinhardt & Stewart (2012) assume that
all collisions are "hit-and-run" in nature for sufficiently
high impact velocities and accretion efficiency is as-
sumed to be zero, i.e., the largest and second largest
remnant masses are equal to the target and projectile
mass respectively. In the "hit-and-run" regime, we con-
firm that the accretion efficiency is consistently close to
zero (within the accuracy of the regressor) in the ma-
jority of the parameter space, but partial accretion or
erosion scenarios are recorded close to transition with
other regimes (Figure 6, left panel).
Our surrogate models show that perfect merging is
rare; it may happen for low impact velocities and mid
impact angles (about 15◦ to 50◦, again, within the ac-
curacy of the regressor). Grazing events need to eject
some material to release angular momentum that would
otherwise lead to unphysical spin (Asphaug & Reufer
2013). Most of the regions categorized by the classi-
fier as merging or "graze-and-merge" is actually partial
accretion rather than perfect merging. The underlying
events were categorized as such since the lost mass is in
the form of debris.
At the boundary between the "hit-and-run" and
"graze-and-merge" regimes (low impact velocity and
high impact angle), the transition curve by our classi-
fier of collision outcome (decision boundary in Figure 4,
right panel) is found to be similar to that by Leinhardt
& Stewart (2012), who use the hit and run velocity
criterion from Kokubo & Genda (2010) to mark the
transition. Across this region, however, we also observe
a rapid decrease in accretion efficiency -- from merging to
"hit-and-run" values -- as the impact velocity increases
(Figure 6, left panel).
We point out the similarity between the transition
curves from our classifier (Figure 4, right panel) and that
of Leinhardt & Stewart (2012) (Figure 6, right panel) at
the boundary between the "hit-and-run" and the partial
erosion regimes. For non-grazing scenarios, Leinhardt
& Stewart (2012) determine the outcome by specific im-
pact energy and γ solely. Accretion efficiency ranges
from partial accretion (cool colors in Figure 6 to catas-
trophic disruption (black color); catastrophic disruption
for this combination of parameters is ξ ≤ −0.21. Be-
sides the differences in the assumed boundaries between
regimes, our simulations are based on different underly-
ing datasets. Our data-driven model is based on simu-
lations from Reufer (2011), whereas the hydrocode sim-
ulations used in Leinhardt & Stewart (2012) are from
diverse source models (e.g., Benz et al. 2007; Marcus
et al. 2009, 2010b). Gabriel et al. (in rev.) demon-
strate that the range of disruption thresholds exhibited
by our dataset are close to the uncertainty of the dis-
ruption threshold of Leinhardt & Stewart (2012). Thus,
we do not consider the difference in disruptive behavior
observed in Figure 6 to be significant.
4.2. A guide to parameter space exploration
13
The designed classifier and regressor have high global
accuracies (Figure 4, left panel and Figure 5), but mis-
classifications and inaccurate predictions can still occur
locally in the parameter space. For a classifier, the local
degree of confusion is quantified by the SVM classifica-
tion score, which is the signed distance to the decision
boundary. If the classifier is asked to predict the class
for a labeled data, a positive, large score on the correct
label means that the prediction is correct (the data are
within the sub-space of the correct class), while a nega-
tive score indicates misclassification; the more negative
the value, the higher the signed distance from the deci-
sion hyper-surface. The decision boundaries -- transition
curve from a collision regime to another -- are in regions
where the score tends to be negative, as the outcome
is more sensitive to slight variations in the pre-impact
conditions and mislabeling is likely to occur. This is
evident in Figure 7, left panel, which shows the clas-
sification scores for the data with MT = 0.1 M⊕ and
similar-mass projectile (γ = MP/MT = 0.7), in a plane
of impact velocity and impact angle. Correct predic-
tions are represented using small dots, while misclassi-
fied datapoints are color-coded according to their score
(i.e., signed distance from the true classification bound-
ary). The larger the absolute value of the score, the
more severe the misclassification. The decision bound-
aries from the classifier are also reported (black curves).
As expected, misclassification occurs more often along
the boundaries.
A similar trend is observed in Figure 7,
right
panel, where the predicted values for accretion effi-
ciency are locally compared directly to the SPH data,
again for MT = 0.1 M⊕ and similar-mass projectile
(γ = MP/MT = 0.7), in a plane of impact velocity
and impact angle. For the regressor, the local accuracy
is quantified in terms of the residuals between pre-
dictions and targets (geometric distance).
Inaccurate
predictions are "more distant" with respect to their
corresponding SPH data than accurate predictions. A
positive (negative) residual indicates that the regressor
is overestimating (underestimating) accretion efficiency
with respect to the target value. In Figure 7, predictions
with positive residuals are represented using diamonds,
while predictions with negative residuals are represented
using dots. For the whole datasets (810 entries) 49%
of the predictions have positive residuals and the re-
maining 51% cases have negative values. Therefore, the
regressor is found to not systematically overestimate or
underestimate accretion efficiency. We note that inac-
curate predictions occur near the decision boundaries
(black curves), which is to be expected. Local accura-
cies are thus expected to vary depending on location in
14
Figure 7. Left panel:
local SVM score of the SPH simulations by the classifier of collision outcomes (small dots: correct
predictions; color-coded datapoints: misclassifications). Right panel: residuals between the predictions by the regressor and
the SPH data, for the same combination of mass of the target and mass of the projectile (diamonds: positive residuals; dots:
negative residuals). Impact velocity ranges between 1 to 4 times the mutual escape velocity, impact angle ranges from head-on
to grazing, MT = 0.1 M⊕ and γ = MP/MT = 0.7. High uncertainty is recorded along the decision boundaries (black curves),
where misclassifications and inaccurate predictions tend to cluster. In these regions, additional SPH simulations are required to
further reduce the "confusion" of the machine learning algorithms.
the parameter space. The residual distribution is well
approximated by a Gaussian fit centered at zero with
1-σ value equal to 0.18. Large areas are characterized
by residuals < 0.1, and few cases (less than 1%) have
residuals up to 0.66 near transition regimes (absolute
value, accretion efficiency units).
The distributions of SVM scores (local uncertainties
for the classifier) and residuals (local uncertainties for
the regressor) provide a guideline towards the complete-
ness of the dataset, by indicating those regions of the pa-
rameter space that require additional simulations. The
decision boundaries must not be intended as binary hard
boundaries between different regimes of giant impact
outcome, but rather as indicators that the outcome is
gradually transitioning from a regime to another. Ex-
amples are the transition regions between "graze-and-
merge" and merging (low impact angle and low impact
velocity, left bottom corner of the panels in Figure 7),
and "hit-and-run" and "graze-and-merge" (high impact
angle and low impact velocity, right bottom corner of
the panels in Figure 7).
The extent of the transition regions is given by the size
of the clusters of inaccurate classifications and predic-
tions ("uncertainty band"). For the classifier, the uncer-
tainty band quantifies the degree of "confusion" of the
field experts during the labeling process. Such confusion
arises because, near and along the decision boundaries,
the outcomes of collision events seem alike or are unclear
to the experts performing the labeling. These cases in-
clude the distinction between impactor disruption (e.g.,
Leinhardt & Stewart 2012) and "hit-and-run". Further-
more, in proximity of certain decision boundaries, the
outcome of a collision is highly sensitive to small changes
in the impact parameters. For this reason, misclassifi-
cations correlate with inaccurate predictions by the re-
gressor in the transition regions. Accretion efficiency is
a real-number physical quantity and its transitions are
smooth due to the occurrence of runner disruption at
the boundary between erosive and "hit-and-run" colli-
sions. The local gradient, however, can be large and
more simulations may be needed for the regressor to re-
solve the region, i.e., to accurately learn the functional
relationship between pre-impact conditions and accre-
tion efficiency along the decision boundaries.
On the other hand, in regions where classification is
exact and regression is accurate, one can avoid running
a full SPH simulation to figure out the outcome, because
the classifier is certain in the prediction of the type of
collision, and the regressor is able to mimic the "parent"
model at high fidelity.
5. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK
We have applied machine learning to explore a large
dataset of SPH simulations for giant impacts (Reufer
2011; Gabriel et al. in rev.). The relationship between
beginning state (e.g., target mass, projectile mass, im-
pact velocity and impact angle) and end state (im-
pact outcome) has been mapped using two approaches.
The result is the prototype of a full surrogate model
of planet-forming giant impacts, which does not suffer
from assumed physical models, and run in a fraction of
a second, compared to days of simulation effort, thus
enabling a fine -- and fast -- mapping of the parameter
space to a known level of accuracy.
First, we train, validate and test a Support Vector
Machine (SVM, Hearst et al. 1998) to predict the type
of the collision among 4 classes: merger, "graze-and-
merge", "hit-and-run", and disruption. The classifier
has global accuracy above 93% at testing (Figure 4, left
panel), but local misclassifications are found to occur
in proximity of the decision boundaries (Figure 7, left
panel). Second, we train a neural network to predict
the accretion efficiency, i.e., mass of the largest remnant
of the collision. The network has a global error level
of 0.04 (Mean Square Error between predictions and
the dataset of SPH accretion efficiencies) and regres-
sion index above 95% at testing (left and right panel in
Figure 5, respectively); locally in the parameter space,
residuals can reach 0.66 in accretion efficiency units (ab-
solute value) but are generally lower, depending on the
parameter region (Figure 7, right panel). These func-
tions -- classifier of collision outcome and regressor of
accretion efficiency -- are called "surrogate models" be-
cause they provide a synthesis of the collision outcomes
without the need to run a full hydrodynamical simula-
tion. They are derived by generalizing the functional re-
lationship between impact properties and outcomes, de-
rived from the SPH simulations, to the whole parameter
space within the ranges of the dataset (Table 1 and Fig-
ure 1). The use of surrogate models avoids performing
additional simulations over the entirety of the param-
eter space, which would be computationally inefficient
given the large number of parameters and the require-
15
ment for high-resolution simulations to produce reliable
outcomes.
The present training has been done using a dataset
that is sparse in many regions of importance. One fea-
ture of machine learning is that the surrogate models
can be easily updated if the training landscape is ex-
panded as new simulations become available. Future
collision surrogate models will benefit from the publica-
tion of datasets available to researchers in the commu-
nity. A proposed list of impact conditions and corre-
spondent collision outcomes for use in realistic N-body
dynamical studies of planetary formation can be found
in Figure 3. Additional interesting outcomes include the
thermodynamic history of the hydro-particles (pressure,
temperature, and density) which provides insights into
the composition and size distribution of the debris field.
For the present work we have trained on giant impacts
in the gravity regime, where material strength plays
a negligible role in the mass of post-impact remnants.
In future work we shall extend the parameter space
to "small giant impacts" involving bodies hundreds to
thousands of kilometers diameter, colliding at around
their mutual escape velocities, hundreds to thousands of
meters per second. In this regime, friction plays a non-
negligible role (e.g., Jutzi 2015; Asphaug 2017). New
inroads have been made into SPH modeling of friction-
governed planetary collisions (Jutzi 2015; Emsenhuber
et al. 2018; Sugiura et al. 2018) revealing its importance
in thousand-kilometer-scale (embryo-embryo) collisions.
Collisions in the friction regime have also been studied
using soft-sphere discrete element (DEM) contacts in
code PKDGRAV (Schwartz et al. 2012) that has been
applied to asteroid family formation (Michel et al. 2001,
2004), ejecta cloud evolution (Schwartz et al. 2016),
and comet formation through catastrophic disruption
(Schwartz et al. 2018). Angle of internal friction and ma-
terial composition (e.g., icy versus chondritic, Schwartz
et al. 2018) are found to have a significant effect on
the mass of the largest remnant (Ballouz et al. 2014,
2015). On asteroids, intergranular cohesion (Scheeres
et al. 2010) becomes a sizeable source of tensile strength,
which may affect the impact outcome. Resolving this
complex physics requires higher numerical resolution
and much more computational overhead per timestep of
evolution. At the larger extreme, there are few sets of
data regarding giant impacts for planets larger than the
Earth (see Marcus et al. 2009, 2010a,b; Liu et al. 2015;
Kegerreis et al. 2018b); here a primary challenge is the
reliable treatment of massive atmospheres. The same
techniques of surrogate model development can be ap-
plied to these simulations, ultimately forming a general
surrogate model for similar-sized planetary collisions at
16
every scale, but, to date, no data table has been pub-
lished at every scale.
The surrogate model is only as good as the post-
processing of the physical simulations that gives us the
derived outcomes for each run. The masses of the final
bound remnants, and their velocities, rotations and com-
positions, must be reliably determined.
In this study,
the final masses have been computed using a friends-of-
friends analysis and a calculation of binding energy; this
is an approximation compared to running the simulation
out many days longer in time to get the final bound ob-
jects, which then is increasingly effected by inaccuracies
in the integrator. The application of Convolutional Neu-
ral Networks (Krizhevsky et al. 2012) could also improve
significantly the reliability of clump detection, allowing
for a more accurate identification and classification of
second- and third-mass planets or planetesimals emerg-
ing from accretion-regime giant impacts.
If it is pos-
sible to reliably identify bound clumps much earlier in
a calculation, then emphasis could be placed on higher
numerical resolution rather than longer runtime.
The combination of giant impact studies and machine
learning is new research, and we anticipate many future
studies (e.g., Valencia et al. 2019). Machine classifica-
tion is able to "corral the herd" of thousands of high-
resolution simulations to identify the underlying struc-
ture of the parameter space. Machine regression is able
to produce a quick and efficient algorithm for accretion
efficiency that can be used in dynamical models, e.g.,
N -body codes studying the growth of planets. These
constitute the prototype of a surrogate model, that will
reliably map inputs to outcomes and will effectively be
equivalent to running an SPH simulation as an interme-
diate step during N -body studies of planet formation. In
fact, the surrogate models may become preferred since
they run on a expediant functional call, yet are trained
on high-resolution simulations instead of low-resolution
simulations that would be run 'on-the-fly'.
Because it represents simulation-derived data as a
function, a surrogate model can be inverted to for-
mally understand the likelihood of specified scenarios of
planet formation, such as Theia deriving from nearby
the Earth, or Mercury forming in a couple of "hit-
and-run" collisions (Chau et al. 2018). Such inversion
can be performed by means of Markov Chain Monte
Carlo Bayesian inference (Stuart 2010) of observed post-
collision scenarios, in which the surrogate models are
used to sample the (unknown) posterior distribution of
pre-impact conditions. Recent uses of this approach in
planetary science include a new technique for constrain-
ing the thermal inertias of rock and regolith, and rela-
tive rock abundance, on asteroids from observed infrared
fluxes (Cambioni et al. 2019). Rather than a boutique of
scenarios that can solve for the origin of a given planet,
there can be an inversion of outcomes. Lastly, there is
an unknown future significance of machine learning in
studies of planet formation, where unsupervised classifi-
cation of these datasets can reveal new and unforeseen
trends and relationships in the data, leading to the de-
velopment of better scientific models. Humans are ex-
cellent at looking for patterns in 2-D and 3-D datasets,
but N -dimensional trends can often be performed better
by a computer, leading to accurate data-driven models
and scaling laws that help explain why collisions happen
the way they do.
S.C., E.A., A.E. and S.R.S. acknowledge support from
NASA Planetary Science Division (PSD) -- grant ti-
tle "Application of Machine Learning to Giant Impact
Studies of Planet Formation" -- and the University of
Arizona. The authors thank the anonymous referees for
the precious comments and suggestions that improved
this manuscript.
REFERENCES
Agnor, C., & Asphaug, E. 2004, ApJ, 613, L157
Asphaug, E., Agnor, C. B., & Williams, Q. 2006, Nature,
Agnor, C. B., Canup, R. M., & Levison, H. F. 1999, Icarus,
439, 155
142, 219
Ahmad, A., & Dey, L. 2007, Data & Knowledge
Engineering, 63, 503
Asphaug, E. 2010, Chemie der Erde / Geochemistry, 70, 199
Asphaug, E. 2017, in Planetesimals: Early Differentiation
and Consequences for Planets, ed. L. T. Elkins-Tanton &
B. P. Weiss, Cambridge Planetary Science (Cambridge
University Press), 737
Asphaug, E., Collins, G., & Jutzi, M. 2015, in Asteroids IV,
ed. P. Michel, F. E. DeMeo, & W. F. Bottke (University
of Arizona Press), 661 -- 677
Asphaug, E., & Reufer, A. 2013, Icarus, 223, 544
-- . 2014, Nat. Geosci., 7, 564
Ballouz, R.-L., Richardson, D. C., Michel, P., & Schwartz,
S. R. 2014, ApJ, 789, 158
Ballouz, R.-L., Richardson, D. C., Michel, P., Schwartz,
S. R., & Yu, Y. 2015, Planet. Space Sci., 107, 29
17
Barnes, J., & Hut, P. 1986, Nature, 324, 446
Hearst, M. A., Dumais, S. T., Osuna, E., Platt, J., &
Baruque, B., & Corchado, E. 2010, in Fusion Methods for
Unsupervised Learning Ensembles (Springer), 31 -- 47
Benz, W., Anic, A., Horner, J., & Whitby, J. A. 2007,
Scholkopf, B. 1998, IEEE Intelligent Systems and their
applications, 13, 18
Hinton, G. E., Deng, L., Yu, D., et al. 2012, IEEE Signal
SSRv, 132, 189
Benz, W., & Asphaug, E. 1999, Icarus, 142, 5
Benz, W., Cameron, A. G. W., & Melosh, H. J. 1989,
Icarus, 81, 113
Bishop, C. M. 2006, Pattern Recognition and Machine
Learning (Information Science and Statistics) (Berlin,
Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag)
Bishop, C. M., et al. 1995, Neural networks for pattern
recognition (Oxford university press)
Boser, B. E., Guyon, I. M., & Vapnik, V. N. 1992, in
Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on
Computational learning theory, ACM, 144 -- 152
Breiman, L. 1996, Machine learning, 24, 123
-- . 2001, Machine learning, 45, 5
Brodley, C. E., & Friedl, M. A. 1999, Journal of artificial
intelligence research, 11, 131
Process. Mag., 29, 1
Hyodo, R., Genda, H., Charnoz, S., & Rosenblatt, P. 2017,
ApJ, 845, 125
Jackson, A. P., Gabriel, T. S. J., & Asphaug, E. I. 2018,
MNRAS, 474, 2924
Jutzi, M. 2015, Planet. Space Sci., 107, 3
Jutzi, M., & Benz, W. 2017, A&A, 597, A62
Kegerreis, J. A., Eke, V. R., Massey, R. J., et al. 2018a, in
Lunar and Planetary Inst. Technical Report, Vol. 49,
Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, 1886
Kegerreis, J. A., Teodoro, L. F. A., Eke, V. R., et al. 2018b,
ApJ, 861, 52
Kokubo, E., & Genda, H. 2010, ApJL, 714, L21
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. 2012, in
Advances in neural information processing systems,
1097 -- 1105
Leinhardt, Z. M., Marcus, R. A., & Stewart, S. T. 2010,
Cambioni, S., Delbo, M., Ryan, A. J., Furfaro, R., &
ApJ, 714, 1789
Asphaug, E. 2019, Icarus,
doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2019.01.017
Canup, R. M. 2005, Science, 307, 546
-- . 2011, AJ, 141, 35
Leinhardt, Z. M., & Stewart, S. T. 2012, ApJ, 745, 79
Leinhardt, Z. M., & Stewart, S. T. 2012, The Astrophysical
Journal, 745, 79
Liu, S.-F., Hori, Y., Lin, D. N. C., & Asphaug, E. 2015,
Canup, R. M., & Asphaug, E. 2001, Nature, 412, 708
ApJ, 812, 164
Canup, R. M., Barr, A. C., & Crawford, D. A. 2013, Icarus,
Marcus, R. A., Sasselov, D., Hernquist, L., & Stewart, S. T.
222, 200
Chambers, J. E. 2013, Icarus, 224, 43
Chau, A., Reinhardt, C., Helled, R., & Stadel, J. 2018,
ApJ, 865, 35
Davis, D. R., & Ryan, E. V. 1990, Icarus, 83, 156
Demuth, H. B., Beale, M. H., De Jess, O., & Hagan, M. T.
2014, Neural network design (Martin Hagan)
Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., & Stork, D. G. 2012, Pattern
classification (John Wiley & Sons),
doi:10.1007/s00357-007-0015-9
Emsenhuber, A., Jutzi, M., & Benz, W. 2018, Icarus, 301,
247
Gabriel, T. S. J., Jackson, A., Asphaug, E., Jutzi, M., &
Benz, W. in rev., ApJ
2010a, ApJL, 712, L73
Marcus, R. A., Sasselov, D., Stewart, S. T., & Hernquist, L.
2010b, ApJL, 719, L45
Marcus, R. A., Stewart, S. T., Sasselov, D., & Hernquist, L.
2009, ApJL, 700, L118
Melosh, H. J. 2007, Meteoritics and Planetary Science, 42,
2079
Michel, P., Benz, W., & Richardson, D. C. 2004,
Planet. Space Sci., 52, 1109
Michel, P., Benz, W., Tanga, P., & Richardson, D. C. 2001,
Science, 294, 1696
Monaghan, J. J. 1992, ARA&A, 30, 543
Monaghan, J. J., & Lattanzio, J. C. 1985, A&A, 149, 135
O'Brien, D. P., Greenberg, R., & Richardson, J. E. 2006,
Icarus, 183, 79
Genda, H., Kobayashi, H., & Kokubo, E. 2015, ApJ, 810,
Raymond, S. N., O'Brien, D. P., Morbidelli, A., & Kaib,
136
Haghighipour, N., Maindl, T., & Schaefer, C. 2017, in
AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts,
Vol. 49, AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting
Abstracts #49, 508.02
N. A. 2009, Icarus, 203, 644
Reufer, A. 2011, PhD thesis, University of Bern
Reufer, A., Meier, M. M. M., Benz, W., & Wieler, R. 2012,
Icarus, 221, 296
Rodrigues, F., Pereira, F., & Ribeiro, B. 2013, Pattern
Hartmann, W. K., & Davis, D. R. 1975, Icarus, 24, 504
Recogn. Lett., 34, 1428
18
Safavian, S. R., & Landgrebe, D. 1991, IEEE transactions
on systems, man, and cybernetics, 21, 660
Scheeres, D. J., Hartzell, C. M., S´anchez, P., & Swift, M.
2010, Icarus, 210, 968
Schmidhuber, J. 2015, Neural networks, 61, 85
Stevenson, D. J. 1987, Ann. Rev. Earth Plan. Sci., 15, 271
Stewart, S. T., & Leinhardt, Z. M. 2009, ApJL, 691, L133
-- . 2012, ApJ, 751, 32
Stuart, A. M. 2010, Acta Numerica, 19, 451
Sugiura, K., Kobayashi, H., & Inutsuka, S. 2018, A&A, 620,
Schwartz, S. R., Michel, P., Jutzi, M., et al. 2018, Nat.
A167
Astron., 2, 379
Schwartz, S. R., Richardson, D. C., & Michel, P. 2012,
Granul. Matter, 14, 363
Schwartz, S. R., Yu, Y., Michel, P., & Jutzi, M. 2016,
Advances in Space Research, 57, 1832
Shashua, A. 2009, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:0904.3664
Shoemaker, E. M. 1962, in Physics and Astronomy of the
Moon, ed. Z. Kopal (Academic Press, New York),
283 -- 359
Socher, R., Bengio, Y., & Manning, C. D. 2012, in Tutorial
Abstracts of ACL 2012, Association for Computational
Linguistics, 5 -- 5
Thompson, S. L., & Lauson, H. S. 1972, Improvements in
the CHART-D Radiation-hydrodynamic code III:
Revised analytic equations of state, Tech. Rep. SC-RR-71
0714, Sandia National Laboratories
Ting, K. M. 2010, in Encyclopedia of Machine Learning,
ed. C. Sammut & G. I. Webb (Boston, MA: Springer
US), 209 -- 209
Valencia, D., Paracha, E., & Jackson, A. P. 2019, arXiv
e-prints, arXiv:1902.04052
Wetherill, G. W. 1985, Science, 228, 877
Zhang, C., & Ma, Y. 2012, Ensemble machine learning:
methods and applications (Springer)
|
1304.6472 | 2 | 1304 | 2013-07-08T14:05:13 | Water-Trapped Worlds | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | Although tidally-locked habitable planets orbiting nearby M-dwarf stars are among the best astronomical targets to search for extrasolar life, they may also be deficient in volatiles and water. Climate models for this class of planets show atmospheric transport of water from the dayside to the nightside, where it is precipitated as snow and trapped as ice. Since ice only slowly flows back to the dayside upon accumulation, the resulting hydrological cycle can trap a large amount of water in the form of nightside ice. Using ice sheet dynamical and thermodynamical constraints, I illustrate how planets with less than about a quarter the Earth's oceans could trap most of their surface water on the nightside. This would leave their dayside, where habitable conditions are met, potentially dry. The amount and distribution of residual liquid water on the dayside depend on a variety of geophysical factors, including the efficiency of rock weathering at regulating atmospheric CO2 as dayside ocean basins dry-up. Water-trapped worlds with dry daysides may offer similar advantages as land planets for habitability, by contrast with worlds where more abundant water freely flows around the globe. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph |
Water-Trapped Worlds
Kristen Menou1
ABSTRACT
Although tidally-locked habitable planets orbiting nearby M-dwarf stars are
among the best astronomical targets to search for extrasolar life, they may also
be deficient in volatiles and water. Climate models for this class of planets show
atmospheric transport of water from the dayside to the nightside, where it is
precipitated as snow and trapped as ice. Since ice only slowly flows back to
the dayside upon accumulation, the resulting hydrological cycle can trap a large
amount of water in the form of nightside ice. Using ice sheet dynamical and ther-
modynamical constraints, I illustrate how planets with less than about a quarter
the Earth's oceans could trap most of their surface water on the nightside. This
would leave their dayside, where habitable conditions are met, potentially dry.
The amount and distribution of residual liquid water on the dayside depend on a
variety of geophysical factors, including the efficiency of rock weathering at reg-
ulating atmospheric CO2 as dayside ocean basins dry-up. Water-trapped worlds
with dry daysides may offer similar advantages as land planets for habitability, by
contrast with worlds where more abundant water freely flows around the globe.
1.
Introduction
Tidally-locked terrestrial planets orbiting in the habitable zone of nearby M-dwarf stars
are among the best astronomical targets for discovery and atmospheric characterization (e.g.,
Charbonneau & Deming 2007; Montgomery & Laughlin 2009; Seager & Deming 2010; Rojas-
Ayala et al. 2013). Recent estimates based on Kepler results are encouraging in suggesting
a high frequency of such planets around M-dwarfs (Dressing & Charbonneau 2013; Fressin
et al. 2013; Kopparapu 2013; Morton & Swift 2013).
The climate on this class of planets is peculiar and interesting because of the perma-
nent day-night insolation pattern many are expected to experience by the end of their tidal
evolution, once they are captured in 1:1 spin-orbit resonance (e.g. Rodriguez et al. 2012;
see Correia & Laskar 2011 for a review). Provided that large enough surface pressures are
1Department of Astronomy, Columbia University, 550 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027
– 2 –
present, nightside atmospheric collapse can be avoided (Joshi et al. 1997). Various other
studies have illustrated how habitable planets around M-dwarfs will typically find themselves
in a climate regime with hot daysides, cold frozen nightsides and an atmospheric circulation
connecting the two hemispheres (Joshi 2003; Merlis & Schneider 2010; Heng et al. 2011; Kite
et al. 2011; Pierrehumbert 2011; Wordsworth et al. 2011; Edson et al. 2011,2012; Leconte
et al. 2013).
Two aspects of the climate problem on these planets which have received less attention,
however, are the possibilities that they are deficient in volatiles and that a significant fraction
of their surface water inventory could be trapped as ice on their nightside. Indeed, Lissauer
(2007) and Raymond et al. (2007) have argued on the basis of standard terrestrial planet
formation scenarios that volatile deficiency may be a key attribute of these planets (see also
Ogira & Ida 2009 for an alternate view). Even planets formed with abundant water could
lose much of their surface inventory via atmospheric escape during an intense tidal heating
phase preceding their spin-orbit resonant capture (Barnes et al. 2013). Heath et al. (1999)
and Joshi (2003) have considered the nightside ice trap issue but they mostly emphasized
how the ice layer would experience melting at its base on worlds with abundant water, thus
making the ice trap inefficient. Recently, Leconte et al.
(2013) have also discussed the
nightside ice trap but mostly in the specific context of the climate bi-stability of planets
found near the inner edge of their habitable zone.
Here, I interpret volatile deficiency as likely implying a small surface water inventory
for these planets and I argue that the ice trap on the nightside of water-deficient planets
around M-dwarfs could in fact be efficient and have a profound effect on their climate. In
§2, I present new simulations of the climate on habitable planets around M-dwarfs which
illustrate the rapid development of a nightside ice trap for surface water. In §3, I develop the
argument about the effective nature of this ice trap on sufficiently water-deficient planets,
before discussing some implications for their climate and concluding in §4.
2. Climate Simulations and Ice Trapping
I use PlanetSimulator, a flexible Earth-System simulator of intermediate complexity
developed at the University of Hamburg,1 to study the climate of tidally-locked habitable
planets around M-dwarfs. PlanetSimulator relies on a pseudo-spectral atmospheric dynami-
cal solver coupled to an accurate radiative transfer scheme. It includes detailed formulations
to simulate the hydrological cycle on Earth-like planets, such as water evaporation and pre-
1www.mi.uni-hamburg.de/plasim
– 3 –
cipitation, diagnostic cloud formation, a 50m slab model for the ocean and a thermodynamic
sea ice model (see Fraedrich et al. 2005 for details). Although these model elements have
been tuned to simulate the Earth's climate, they are expected to remain reasonably accu-
rate for climates deviating only modestly from Earth's conditions, as is the case here. I use
PlanetSimulator in its T42L10 formulation (128 longitude nodes, 64 latitude nodes and 10
vertical levels).
I modified PlanetSimulator to enforce a permanent day-night insolation pattern and I set
the planetary obliquity and orbital eccentricity to zero in all models, for consistency with the
tidally-locked hypothesis investigated here. I adopt an Earth-like insolation of 1365 W m−2
in all models and a planet rotation period Prot = 240 h by default, which corresponds to
a tidally-locked planet around a ∼ 0.3 M(cid:12) M-dwarf (Edson et al. 2012). I also removed
orography (relief over continents) from all models to make the results more general and after
tests showed that it does not have a major impact on the main results. I use the current
distribution of Earth continents in models with continents. All other model parameters take
their standard Earth values, unless otherwise stated.2
Table 1 shows the list of models I have explored in this work. All models are run for 40
Earth months, which is sufficient for the surface temperature field to reach a steady-state
under permanent insolation, starting from Earth-like initial conditions. Earth1, Earth2 and
Earth3 are models with standard Earth parameters, the default rotation period Prot = 240 h
and a permanent insolation pattern centered on longitude 0 deg (Greenwhich), +90 deg
(Bangladesh) and +180 deg (central pacific ocean), respectively. Earth.lowP is similar to
Earth1 except that the total atmospheric surface pressure is reduced to 0.3 bar.3 With
a constant CO2 fraction of 360 ppm, this also corresponds to a CO2 atmospheric content
reduced by about a third. Earth.lowCO2 and Earth.highCO2 are similar to Earth1 except
for CO2 fraction of 36 ppm and 3600 ppm, respectively.4 Earth.fast and Earth.slow are
similar to Earth1 except for their rotation periods Prot = 120 h and 480 h, respectively.
2In particular, I have not accounted for the reduced ice and snow albedos expected on planets orbiting
M-dwarfs (Joshi & Haberle 2012). This is expected to have only a minor quantitative impact on the main
results of interest here because only a small fraction of the icy surface is actually exposed to insolation (see
also Leconte et al. 2013).
3Volatile deficiency could in principle also result in a reduce N2 atmospheric content, which is captured
by the lower surface pressure in this model. Note that improved modeling of low surface pressure scenarios
would entail verifying the accuracy of the PlanetSimulator radiative scheme under these conditions, which
was not done here.
4Lucarini et al. (2013) suggest that PlanetSimulator's radiative transfer scheme should remain reasonably
accurate over this range of CO2 atmospheric content values.
– 4 –
SuperEarth is similar to Earth1 except that it uses larger values of the surface gravity and
the planetary radius, corresponding to a super-Earth with a mass ∼ 10 M⊕ (see Table 1;
Valencia et al. 2006). Finally, Aquaplanet is similar to the Earth1-3 models except that all
the continents have been replaced by a global ocean.
I find that the general circulation regime in all these models is qualitatively consistent
with what has been reported in the literature before for other tidally-locked habitable planet
models (e.g., Joshi et al. 1997; Merlis & Schneider 2010; Heng et al. 2011; Edson et al.
2012). The majority of models listed in Table 1 exhibit a zonally-averaged zonal wind
profile comparable to that of Earth, with two eastward jets streams at altitude and negative
wind speeds at the equatorial ground. In three models, however (Earth.lowP, Earth.slow
and SuperEarth), the general circulation is in a superrotating5 regime with positive zonal
winds at the equatorial ground and a rather broad eastward jet at altitude. Maximum
zonally-averaged wind speeds range from ∼ 17 m s−1 (SuperEarth model) to ∼ 60 m s−1
(Earth.highCO2). Interestingly, these results are not entirely consistent with the study of
Edson et al. (2012), who reported faster wind speeds in their superrotating models and
dynamical transitions to the superrotating regime at Prot (cid:39) 100–101 h for land planets and
Prot (cid:39) 72–96 h for aquaplanets (i.e., at faster rotation rates than found here). It would be
interesting to understand the origin of this discrepancy better. I simply note for now that
it does not appear to have a major impact on the main results of interest here for nightside
ice since all models in Table 1 exhibit comparable properties in that respect.
Figure 1 shows representative end results from the Aquaplanet model. The surface
temperature field shows that liquid water conditions are confined to the dayside of the planet
(see also Figure 4), making this model climate comparable to the eyeball climate discussed
by Pierrehumbert (2011). On the nightside, the coldest surface conditions are offset from
the poles and the equator is the hottest, as the region where the near-surface wind is the
most efficient at carrying heat from the dayside and coupling it with the nightside surface.
Precipitable water in the atmosphere is also largely confined to the dayside, where evap-
oration strongly peaks at the substellar point. The circulation is able to advect, preferentially
eastward, a modest amount of moisture to the nightside, where it is precipitated as snow.
Most of the snow precipitation occurs in an annulus on the dayside, but the weak snow pre-
cipitation rates on the nightside are nevertheless interesting in terms of the ice accumulation
rates they imply (see below). As noted before by Merlis & Schneider (2010) in comparable
5Superrotation refers to a regime with positive equatorial winds, which imply "eddy" momentum transport
towards the equator beyond what any type of axisymmetric meridional circulation can achieve (e.g., Showman
et al. 2011).
– 5 –
simulations, strong net precipitation occurs in the vicinity of the substellar point, with net
evaporation over most of the dayside. All of the properties illustrated in Figure 1 are qual-
itatively shared by the other models listed on Table 1, which suggest that they are rather
general for tidally-locked habitable planets around M-dwarf stars.
For each of the models, Table 1 also lists the snow precipitation rate averaged over the
planetary nightside. Values range from 0.3 to 0.01 mm day−1, in broad agreement with
the 0.11 mm day−1 nightside rate reported by Joshi (2003).6 This range largely reflects
the efficiency of the circulation at advecting moisture to the nightside, which is noticeably
weaker in the Earth.slow model (see also Merlis & Schneider 2010). Nevertheless, with
such precipitation rates, a layer of 1 km of ice would take between 3 × 104 and 106 yr, and
typically ∼ 105 yr, to accumulate on the nightside (accounting for the factor ∼ 3 difference
between the density of snow and ice). These timescales are quite short and they suggest
a rapid change in the hydrological cycle of planets with no more than a few km of ocean
(such as Earth), following their capture into 1:1 spin-orbit resonance. It is thus important to
understand the nature of this ice layer in detail if one is to address the climate of habitable
planets around M-dwarfs.
3. Nightside Ice Sheet
3.1. General Considerations
Figure 2 illustrates schematically three possible configurations for the nightside ice layer
on a tidally-locked planet. For the sake of argument, a uniformly flat ocean basin has
been assumed and continents have been ignored, though the consequences of lifting these
assumptions are reconsidered in §4.
As discussed quantitatively in §3.3, a conducting ice layer carrying a given geothermal
heat flux has a limited thickness because melting eventually occurs at its base.7 This limiting
thickness is smaller for warmer surface temperatures at the top of the ice layer. Tidally-
locked planets with relatively mild nightside temperatures and/or a large surface water
inventory will thus have their nightside ice layer float over a sub-glacial ocean connecting to
the dayside ocean. This scenario, which is the one emphasized by Health et al. (1999; see
6Note that Joshi's simulations are not fully consistent for M-dwarf habitable planets in that they assume
an Earth-like planetary rotation rate (Prot = 24 h).
7At least for ice pressures (cid:28) 100s MPa, which is the relevant regime for the water-deficient planets of
interest here.
– 6 –
also Joshi 2003), is depicted in the first "ice shelf configuration" shown in Fig. 2. In this
configuration, rain and snow precipitate on the nightside, as a result of moisture advection
from the dayside (gray arrows). Snowfall does not add to the ice layer thickness, however,
because the thickness is limited by basal melting. The steady-state hydrological cycle is
closed with a return flow of water to the dayside via the sub-glacial ocean (yellow arrows).
The ice+ocean layer thickness must be essentially uniform over the entire globe to satisfy
lateral pressure equilibrium at the base, or rapid water flows would ensue to enforce this
equilibrium.8
As depicted by the second"ice sheet configuration" in Fig. 2, on a planet with less surface
water and/or colder nightside temperatures, it becomes possible for part of the ice layer not
to exceed the critical thickness for melting. This region of the ice layer is then grounded, as
shown in between the two radial dotted lines in Fig. 2. Rain and snow precipitation act the
same as in the previous configuration, with the important exception of the grounded ice sheet.
Ice is able to accumulate in this ice sheet and sustain a sizable pressure gradient at its base
(indicated by a bulged ice layer in Fig. 2) because of the considerable ice viscosity. Ice flows
down the basal pressure gradient in the ice sheet and, in steady state, the hydrological cycle
must satisfy a new mass balance: over the grounded ice sheet, ice accumulation from snowfall
must balance the flow of ice exiting the ice sheet at its boundary with the sub-glacial ocean.
Since ice accumulation is made possible by the enormous difference of viscosity between the
grounded ice flow (in the ice sheet) and the water flow (in the ocean) covering the rest of
the globe, an ice sheet model describing the viscous flow of ice is necessary to evaluate the
amount of ice present in the ice sheet.
The third "water-trapped configuration," which is of particular interest to the present
study, is essentially an extreme version of the "ice shelf configuration." On a planet with even
less surface water and/or even colder nightside temperatures, one can in principle have the
great majority of the surface water trapped in the slowly flowing ice sheet, with little water
present in liquid form on the dayside. A finite liquid dayside inventory remains a necessity
to close the hydrological cycle.
Indeed, it is the evaporation, advection and subsequent
precipitation of this dayside water on the nightside that must balance the flux of ice flowing
back to the dayside, but the size of this dayside liquid reservoir could in principle be very
small, as depicted in Fig. 2. To evaluate how much water can potentially be trapped on the
nightside in this configuration, I now turn to quantitative ice sheet models.
8Note that the thick ice shelf representation in Fig. 2 is highly idealized since ice shelves on Earth are
known to spread out and thin out efficiently, and they can experience catastrophic break-ups (e.g., Tziperman
et al. 2012, Scambos et al. 2009).
– 7 –
3.2.
Isothermal Ice Sheet Models
Thermo-mechanical models of ice sheets exist (e.g. Bueler et al. 2007; Fowler 2011) but
I find it convenient for the present purpose to consider separately mechanical and thermo-
dynamical constraints to gain insight into the behavior of nightside ice on a tidally-locked
planet. The use of a simple, isothermal ice sheet model can be justified by noting that a
comparable diffusion equation can be derived for the non-isothermal case (e.g., Fowler 2011)
and that ice sheets generally exhibit strong vertical shear preferentially near their bottom
boundary, i.e. over a limited range of temperatures. The evolutionary equation satisfied by
a thin isothermal ice sheet with a flat base and a no slip boundary condition at its bottom
is (Fowler 2011)
(cid:20)
(cid:21)
= ∇ ·
∂h
∂t
2(ρg)3A0
hn+2∇hn−1
n + 2
∇h
+ a,
(1)
where h is the ice thickness, ρ = 917 kg m−3 is the mean density of ice, g is the surface
gravity, A0 = 10−16 Pa yr−1 is a typical value of the flow rate constant (related to the ice
viscosity near the bottom of the ice sheet), n = 3 is the typical value used in Glen's ice
flow law to model the non-Newtonian nature of the ice fluid and a is the ice accumulation
rate (assumed constant to model uniform snowfall over the ice sheet). This equation is a
non-linear diffusion equation for the ice thickness, h, satisfying the conservation of mass and
momentum in the shallow ice approximation (h much less than the horizontal length-scale of
the ice sheet). The quantity in bracket is the ice flux, with an effective diffusion coefficient
that depends strongly on the ice thickness and its horizontal gradient.
Equation (1) admits analytical solutions (e.g., Bueler 2003) and I shall use such a simple
solution here. I solve the adimensional, steady-state axisymmetric version of Eq (1) for the
standard n = 3 value in Glen's law,
(cid:34)
(cid:19)3(cid:35)
(cid:18) ds
dr
1
r
d
dr
rs5
(cid:18) 5L4a
(cid:19)1/8
Z =
2(ρg)3A0
+ 1 = 0,
(2)
where r = R/L is the adimensional cylindrical radius from the ice shelf center (located
in R = 0), r = 1 marks the outer edge of the axisymmetric ice sheet (defined by R = L
dimensionally), s = h/Z is the adimensional ice thickness, and
(3)
– 8 –
is the ice thickness scale factor.
I integrate this equation a first time with respect to r and use the central boundary
condition ds/dr = 0 in r = 0 (the ice "ridge"). I integrate a second time with respect to r
and use a finite, arbitrary thickness hout for the boundary condition in r = 1. This boundary
condition guarantees a finite ice flux at the point where the ice ceases to be grounded and
reaches flotation over water (indicated by the radial dotted lines in the middle panel of
Fig. 2), at which point the ice sheet equation ceases to be valid (fowler 2011). The resulting
dimensional solution for the ice sheet thickness is
(cid:34)
(cid:34)(cid:18)1
2
(cid:19)4/3 −
(cid:18) R
2L
(cid:19)4/3(cid:35)
(cid:18) hout
Z
+
(cid:19)8/3(cid:35)3/8
h(R) = Z
4
.
(4)
This solution generalizes the singular case hout = 0 already known in the literature (e.g.,
Bueller 2003). The case hout > 0 is more satisfactory for the present application in that it
permits a finite ice flux at the outer edge (where flotation is reached) to balance the ice
accumulation rate integrated over the entire ice sheet.
Figure 3 shows a few ice thickness profiles derived from Eq. (4). The solid line is
the solution for an ice sheet of L = 10000 km in radius, a uniform ice accumulation rate9
a = 0.1 mm day−1 and a boundary thickness hout = 1 km. The dash-dotted line, which
is nearly indistinguishable from the solid line, corresponds to a similar solution except for
hout = 500 m, while the dotted line corresponds to a reduced accumulation rate a = 0.01
mm day−1. The dashed line is the solution for an ice sheet of L = 5000 km in radius (with
accumulation rate a = 0.1 mm day−1 and hout = 500 m). The corresponding values of
the ice thickness scale factor in these four solutions are Z = 7737, 7737, 5802 and 5471 m,
respectively.
An exploration of the parameter space of these simple ice sheet solutions shows that
the value of hout has only a small impact on the global ice profile, as long as hout (cid:28) Z. The
scale factor Z itself is a good indicator of the overall ice thickness across the profile (and
thus the total mass ∼ ZL2 in the ice sheet), as illustrated in Fig. 3. Stronger (weaker) ice
accumulation rates lead to thicker/steeper (thinner/shallower) ice profiles, as expected from
the ice sheet adopting a steady-state thickness profile such that the local ice flux at any
radius carries an amount of ice equal to the integrated accumulation rate within that radius
(Eq. (2)). It is this mass balance that sets the typical ice thickness in these models.
9Note that ice accumulates at a rate approximately 3 times slower than snow precipitates, in proportion
to the ratio of ice to snow density.
– 9 –
The climate models discussed in §2 do suggest the possibility of an ice sheet extending
globally over the entire nightside, which corresponds to an ice sheet radius L (cid:39) 10000 km on
an Earth-size planet.10 For ice accumulation rates representatives of the average nightside
precipitation in these same climate models (∼ 0.01–0.3 mm/day of snow, see Table 1), a
typical ice thickness is thus Z ∼ 5.5–7.7 km for an ice sheet of radius L = 10000 km (see
also Eq. (3)). Such ice depths would imply a considerable amount of ice being trapped on
the nightside. As we shall now see, such a massive ice trap may be limited by additional
thermodynamical constraints.
3.3. Thermodynamic Melting Constraint
Ice thickness is also limited by the melting condition for ice at high pressure, at the
base of the ice sheet. In its simplest form, this process is modeled as a vertical, steady-state
conduction problem for the ice layer transporting a specified geothermal flux to the surface.
Here, I adopt for concreteness the formalism of Abbot & Switzer (2011), which accounts
for the important variation with temperature of the ice thermal conductivity. The resulting
exponential temperature profile for the steady-state conductive ice layer yields a maximum
thickness before melting,
(cid:18) Tmelt
(cid:19)
hcond =
A
F
ln
Tsurf
,
(5)
where the water ice conductivity is given by k(T ) = AT −1, A = 651 W m−1, T is
the ice temperature in K, F is the thermal flux being conducted ((cid:39) 0.09 W m−2 for Earth's
geothermal flux),11 Tmelt (cid:39) 260 K is a representative high-pressure water melting temperature
and Tsurf is the temperature boundary condition at the top of the ice layer. Tsurf is determined
by surface-atmosphere exchanges which are modeled explicitly in the climate simulations
described in §2.
It is therefore straightforward to translate a surface temperature map into a map of
maximum ice thickness before melting occurs, according to Eq. (5). An example is shown
in Fig. 4 for the Aquaplanet model, assuming Earth's geothermal flux for F . This map
10All else being equal, a super-Earth has ice sheets g−3/8 times thinner from stronger gravity, although a
global ice sheet could also be thicker from the extra L1/2 horizontal scale factor in Eq. (3).
11The geothermal flux may scale up with planet mass to the power one half, so that ice layers would be
comparatively thinner on super-Earths (Abbot & Switzer 2011).
– 10 –
shows that the melting constraint on the ice thickness is stringent. Most of the nightside
ice has a maximum depth ∼ 1–1.5 km before melting occurs, with a colder region of a few
thousand km in extent allowing for thicker ice (up to 4.3 km depth). A first, conservative
limit on the amount of ice that can be trapped on the nightside of a tidally-locked planet
can thus be obtained by considering that this thermodynamic melting constraint provides an
effective limit to ice accumulation. Since most of the nightside exhibits surface temperatures
which may not permit ice thickness in excess of 1.5–2 km without melting, the considerably
larger values of ice thickness (5.5-7.7 km) that would otherwise accumulate according to
steady-state ice sheet models may not be realized in practice, because basal melting would
prevent such large ice buildup. In this interpretation, the actual ice thickness may be close
to marginal basal melting since steady-state mass balance, as described by simple isothermal
ice sheet models, would systematically have more ice accumulate, until basal melting limits
this accumulation.
A weaker, alternative limit on the amount of ice trapped on the nightside of a tidally-
locked planet can be obtained by considering the possibly important role of basal water flows
on the energetics of the ice sheet. When basal melting occurs, it is natural for basal water
to advect heat away from the regions where the ice is thickest, i.e. down the basal pressure
gradient. Such a basal water flow, carrying heat away from melting regions, can reduce the
heat flux Feff effectively conducted through the overlying ice sheet (e.g., Cuffey & Paterson
2010), allowing thicker ice than was suggested by our use of the simple one-dimensional
criterion in Eq. (5) (by virtue of Feff being less than F ). Although it is difficult to make
quantitative predictions for this effect without a basal water flow model, a strong hypothesis
sometimes adopted in multi-dimensional ice sheet modeling is to assume that basal water
efficiently escapes from under the ice sheet, carrying away any excess heat needed for melting
(e.g., Hulbe & MacAyeal 1999). In such a limit, the ice sheet thickness is no longer strongly
limited by melting but it would instead be determined by the ice sheet mass balance through
accumulation (as modeled by Eq (1) for instance).12
Although idealized, these two separate limits for ice thickness, which we refer to as the
strong and weak melting constraints, are useful in bracketing the possible behaviors of ice
on the nightside of a tidally-locked planet, when basal melting occurs. After integration,
the ice distribution following the strong melting constraint, shown in Fig. 4, amounts to an
12In this interpretation, one also implicitly assumes that the thick, wet-based ice does not experience
sliding because it is trapped by thinner, frozen-base ice at the periphery of the ice sheet, and that any basal
water escapes from under the ice sheet through sufficiently localized sub-glacial streams. Regular emptying
of this ice reservoir through rapid sliding events could in principle occur, by analogy with 'Heinrich' events
for the Laurentide ice sheet during Earth's last glacial period (e.g., MacAyeal 1993).
– 11 –
equivalent depth of 560 m spread over the entire globe. Similar averages13 for the other
climates models listed in Table 1 range from 320 to 770 m. This range of values largely
reflects how cold the nightside is in each model, with the lowest efficiency of heat advection
to the nightside found in the model Earth.low (with a low atmospheric mass). By contrast,
the ice distributions shown as solid and dotted lines in Fig. 3, which could in principle
be realized according to the weak melting constraint, amount to equivalent depths (spread
over the entire globe) of 2400 and 1806 m for ice sheets covering the entire nightside on an
Earth-sized planet.
The amount of surface water on Earth (essentially in the oceans) corresponds to an
average depth of ∼ 2700 m once spread over the globe (e.g., Charette & Smith 2010).
Adopting the strong melting constraint, one concludes that the climate models listed in
Table 1 could trap from a seventh up to almost a third of the Earth's surface water on their
nightsides, with the majority of models trapping about a quarter to a fifth. Following the
alternative weak melting constraint, when efficient sub-glacial water-flows are present, one
concludes that about 65-90% of the Earth's surface water could be trapped on the nightside
of an Earth-sized planet.14 In both cases, this is considerably more that the amount of water
in ice form on Earth and large enough that water-deficient planets may be at risk of trapping
most of their surface water on their nightside.
It is difficult, however, to make robust predictions for the total amount of water present
on terrestrial planets on the basis of planet formation models. Simulations of in situ forma-
tion by Raymond et al. (2007) suggest that habitable zone planets around M-dwarfs could
form with as little as two orders of magnitude less bulk water than Earth, which would likely
result in significantly reduced amounts of surface water as well. On the other hand, Ogira
& Ida (2009) argue that water could be abundantly present on terrestrial planets in the
habitable zone of M-dwarfs if planetary migration efficiently brings in bodies from beyond
the ice line. Depending on details of the protoplanetary disk structure and how it influences
the planetary migration process, both scenarios could be at work in nature. M-dwarf planets
could also lose much of their initial surface water inventory via atmospheric escape during
the intense tidal heating phase that may precede their spin-orbit resonant capture (Barnes
13For simplicity, I do not differentiate between land and ocean when making such averages. The role of
continents is reconsidered in §4.
14Such large amounts of nightside ice are likely overestimated because the corresponding ice sheet thickness,
shown in Fig. 3, approaches the tropospheric height of the atmosphere, which would reduce snow precipitation
on the nightside. To evaluate the magnitude of this effect, which will act to reduce the ice thickness, one
will have to consistently include the orographic blueprint of a thick ice sheet in specially-designed climate
models.
– 12 –
et al. 2013). I will adopt the simple view here that at least some terrestrial planets in the
habitable zone of M-dwarfs could be quite deficient in surface water.
Therefore, among the population of habitable Earth-like planets around M-dwarfs, those
who possess only a fraction of the Earth's surface water inventory could trap the great
majority of their water in the form of nightside ice. Although the dayside of such water-
trapped worlds may end up being quite dry, it is worth emphasizing again that a closed
hydrological cycle requires liquid water to remain present on the dayside to compensate for
the return flow of ice from the nightside (see Fig 2 and discussion below). Evaluating exactly
how much liquid water is present on the dayside of a water-trapped world is challenging15
and, as I shall briefly describe below, it is closely related to other long-term climate issues
for such planets.
4. Discussion and Conclusion
Using a combination of climate and ice sheet models, I made the case for tidally-locked
habitable planets around M-dwarfs being able to trap most of their surface water in the
form of nightside ice, provided they are sufficiently volatile-deficient. Quantitatively, planets
subjected to an Earth-equivalent insolation and possessing less than about a quarter the
Earth's surface water inventory could rapidly find themselves into a water-trapped configu-
ration, following their capture into 1:1 spin-orbit resonance. The critical amount of surface
water below which a water-trapped configuration can occur will probably vary with the
magnitude of insolation received by such planets, although this issue cannot be easily disen-
tangled from the atmospheric CO2 content and the climate being regulated by global-scale
weathering, which has a potentially strong dependence on the continental distribution for
tidally-locked planets (Edson et al. 2011).
Clearly, the main argument constructed in this work relies on a number of assumptions
and approximations made in the climate and ice sheet models, which all deserve further
scrutiny. For example, oceanic heat transport to the nightside, which is not accounted
for in either type of models, could provide an extra heat source that may act to limit the
ice thickness relative to the results discussed above.16
In the limit where this transport
is efficient, significant ice accumulation may only occur on the fraction of the planetary
15For example, Leconte et al. (2013) have presented an idealized model for a water reservoir present at
the edge of the icy region, without accounting for constraints on the nightside ice flow.
16Under particular conditions, tidal dissipation could contribute an additional heat flux acting to limit the
nightside ice layer thickness (e.g., Barnes et al. 2013; Leconte et al. 2013).
– 13 –
nightside that is covered by continents,17 thus reducing the size of the ice trap. This is an
example of how the detailed topography and ocean basin configuration on a water-trapped
world can have a strong impact on its climate.
Another example of the important role played by the continental distribution and ocean
basin configuration concerns the amount of residual liquid water left on the dayside of a
water-trapped world. In the climate models discussed in §2, the ability to precipitate snow
at the rates listed in Table 1 largely relies on evaporation over oceans and moisture transport
to the nightside by the atmosphere. In a water-trapped configuration, as the dayside oceans
gradually dry up, their evaporative surface will shrink in a way that depends on the detailed
ocean basin configuration. The atmospheric moisture transport to the nightside may also
be affected when a significant lowering of the dayside sea level occurs. If this were to result
in substantially decreased nightside precipitation rates, the nightside ice sheet would tend
to accumulate less ice than evaluated in §3 (see, e.g., scaling with a in Eq. (3)). Eventually,
the ice layer depth would not be limited by melting at the base but simply by mass balance
at very small accumulation rates. This regime, which would require snow precipitation rates
orders of magnitudes smaller than the values listed in Table 1, may happen on some water-
trapped worlds but not others, when dayside oceans dry up. Regardless, this reasoning
illustrates how a reliable evaluation of the amount of liquid water left on the dayside of a
water-trapped world must rely on a closed hydrological cycle, i.e. one that accounts for two-
way exchanges between the dayside and the nightside water reservoirs, in a manner more
explicit than the isolated ice sheet models considered in §3.
The amount of residual liquid water on the dayside of water-trapped worlds will also
depend on the efficiency of rock weathering at regulating the CO2 content of the atmosphere.
Abe et al. (2011) argue that weathering will continue to operate on land planets but the
efficiency of the process may differ from what it is on Earth, depending on the availability of
surface water for different land regions.18 On a planet with dried-up dayside ocean basins,
more rock will be exposed to the atmosphere but the opportunity for ocean weathering would
also largely disappear, with unclear consequences for the global weathering rate (e.g., Abbot,
Cowan & Ciesla 2012). Quantitatively, the models Earth.lowCO2 and Earth.highCO2 listed
in Table 1 exhibit ∼ 150 m differences in their ice equivalent thicknesses, relative to the
17I note that the literature on Earth's True Polar Wander suggests that continental distribution and
planetary moments of inertia are not strongly coupled attributes (e.g., Kirschvink et al. 1997, Raub et.
al. 2007). This also suggests a lack of correlation between the continental distribution and the day/night
hemispheres that end up being locked into 1:1 spin-orbit resonance by tides on a close-in planet.
18For example, desertification could occur in regions where evaporation dominates over precipitation, such
as the dayside annular region away from the substellar point with negative net precipitation in Fig. 1.
– 14 –
model Earth1 with 360ppm of CO2. This makes it clear that even modest adjustments to
the atmospheric CO2 content by weathering can have a significant impact on the residual
dayside surface water inventory of a water-trapped world.
A related issue is the fate of the large CO2 reservoir stored in the ocean (about 50
times that in the atmosphere on Earth). Although this reservoir may shrink in proportion
to the total ocean mass on volatile deficient planets, if one assumes a fixed CO2 ocean
concentration, it could still amount to a significant and sudden CO2 increase if released in
the atmosphere when dayside oceans dry-up on a water-trapped world. This excess CO2
would presumably be weathered on long-enough timescales, so that the long-term climate
would remain determined by detailed balance between the hydrological cycle and the carbon-
silicate cycle.
The trapping of the majority of the surface water inventory in the form of nightside ice
does not necessarily constitute a challenge to the habitability of water-trapped worlds. Abe
et al. (2011) found more extended habitability limits for land planets than for aquaplanets
and they illustrated how land planets are better at holding on to their water, which is lost
through atmospheric escape, even if they start with less water than aquaplanets (see also
Leconte et al. 2013; Zsom, Seager & de Wit 2013). Water-trapped worlds with dry daysides
and frozen nightsides may thus offer similar advantages as land planets for habitability, in
comparison with worlds where more abundant water is free to flow around the globe (first
configuration shown in Fig. 2). A water-trapped configuration may, however, lead to more
strongly localized habitable regions, depending on the availability and detailed distribution of
surface water on the dayside. It would thus be interesting to determine to what extent water-
trapped and water-free configurations can be discriminated from one another observationally.
This may be challenging if the surface conditions are not directly accessible (e.g., Benneke
& Seager 2012) and if the stratospheric water content probed by transmission spectroscopy
is not too different between these two configurations (e.g., Fig. 12 of Joshi 2003).
The author is grateful to D. Valencia for many insights on the geophysics of this problem,
to C. Lithgow-Bertelloni for useful exchanges on the True Polar Wander literature and to
the referee D. Abbot for many constructive comments, including the suggestion that thicker
ice may be allowed with sub-glacial water flows. This work was supported in part by NASA
grant PATM NNX11AD65G.
Abe, Y. et al. 2011, Astrobiology 11, 443
REFERENCES
– 15 –
Abbot, D. S., Cowan, N. B., Ciesla, F. J. 2012, ApJ 756, 178
Abbot, D. S., Switzer, E. R. 2011, ApJ 735, L27
Barnes, R. et al. 2013, Astrobiology 13, 225
Benneke, B., Seager, S 2012, ApJ 753, 100
Bueler, E. 2003, Construction of steady state solutions for isothermal shallow ice sheets.
Technical Report 03-02, UAF DMS.
(http://www.cs.uaf.edu/∼bueler/steadyiso.pdf)
Bueler, E., Brown, J., Lingle, C. 2007, Journal of Glaciology 53, 499
Charbonneau, D., Deming, D. 2007, arXiv:0706.1047
Charette, M. A., Smith, W. H. F. 2010, Oceanography 23, 112
Correia, A. C. M., Laskar, J. 2011, Exoplanets, edited by S. Seager. Tucson, AZ: University
of Arizona Press, p. 239
Cuffey, K., Paterson, W. S. B. 2010, The Physics of Glaciers, 4th Ed. (Elsevier)
Dressing, C. D., Charbonneau, D. 2013, arXiv:1302.1647
Edson, A. et al. 2011, Icarus 212, 1
Edson, A. et al. 2012, Astrobiology 12, 562
Fowler, A. 2011, Mathematical Geoscience (Springer)
Fraedrich, K., Jansen, H.,Kirk, E., Luksch, U., Lunkeit, F. 2005, Meteorol. Z. 14, 299-304.
Fressin, F. et al. 2013, ApJ 766, 81
Heath, M. J., Doyle, L. R., Joshi, M. M., Haberle, R. M. 2009, Origins of Life and Evolution
of the Biosphere 29, 405
Heng, K., Menou, K. & Phillipps, P. J. 2011, MNRAS 413, 2380
Joshi, M. M., Haberle, R. M. & Reynolds, R. T. 1997, Icarus 129, 450
Joshi, M. 2003, Astrobiology 3, 415
Joshi, M. M., Haberle, R. M. 2012, Astrobiology 12, 3
Hulbe, C. L., MacAyeal 1999, J. Geophys. Res. 104(B11), 25394
Kite, E. S., Gaidos, E., Manga, M. 2011, ApJ 743, 41
Kirschvink, J. L., Ripperdan, R. L., Evans, D. A. 1997, Science 277, 541
Kopparapu, R. K. 2013, ApJ 767, L8
Leconte, J. et al. 2013, arxiv 1303.7079
– 16 –
Lissauer, J. J. 2007, ApJ 660, L149
Lucarini, V. et al. 2013, arXiv:1303.5937
MacAyeal, D. 1993, Paleoceanography, 8(6), 775
Merlis, T. M., Schneider, T. 2010, James 2, 13
Montgomery, R., Laughlin, G. 2009 Icarus 202, 1
Morton, T. D., Swift, J. J. 2013, arXiv:1303.3013
Ogihara, M., Ida, S. 2009, ApJ 699, 824
Pierrehumbert, R. T. 2011, ApJ 726, L8
Raub, T. D., Kirschvink, J.L., Evans. D. A. D. 2007 Treatise on Geophysics, V. 5, Ch. 14,
p. 565
Raymond, S. N., Scalo, J., Meadows, V. S. 2007, ApJ 669, 606
Rodrguez, A., Callegari, N., Michtchenko, T. A., Hussmann, H. 2012, MNRAS 427, 2239
Rojas-Ayala, B. et al. 2013, Astronomische Nachrichten 334, 155
Scambos, T. et al. 2009, Earth And Planetary Science Letters, 280(1-4), 51
Seager, S., Deming, D. 2010, ARA&A 48, 631
Showman, A. P., Cho, J. Y.-K., Menou, K. 2011, Exoplanets, edited by S. Seager. Tucson,
AZ: University of Arizona Press, p. 419
Tziperman, E. et al. 2012, J. Geophys. Res. 117, C05016
Valencia, D., O'Connell, R. J., Sasselov, D. 2006, Icarus 181, 545
Wordsworth, R. D. et al. 2011, ApJ 733, L48
Zsom, A., Seager, S., de Wit, J. 2013, arXiv:1304.3714
This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2.
– 17 –
Model
Earth1
Earth2
Earth3
Earth.lowP
Earth.lowCO2
Earth.highCO2
Earth.fast
Earth.slow
SuperEarth
Aquaplanet
Key Parameters
Nightside Snow
Precipitation (mm/day)
Equivalent Ice
Thickness (m)
Prot = 240 h, Stellar longitude = 0 deg
Prot = 240 h, Stellar longitude = +90 deg
Prot = 240 h, Stellar longitude = +180 deg
Earth1 except Psurf = 0.3 bar
Earth1 except CO2 = 36 ppm
Earth1 except CO2 = 3600 ppm
Earth1 except Prot = 120 h
Earth1 except Prot = 480 h
Earth1 except g = 29.63 m s−2, Rp = 11000 km
Earth1 without continents
0.12
0.11
0.26
0.27
0.10
0.16
0.29
0.009
0.07
0.06
470
440
400
770
600
320
340
490
400
560
Table 1: Key parameters of climate simulations and results.
– 18 –
Fig. 1.- End snapshots from the Aquaplanet model. Clockwise, from upper left: sur-
face temperature (K), precipitable water (kg m−2), net precipitation (precipitation minus
evaporation in m s−1, with an arbitrarily skewed scale to highlight low values) and snow
precipitation (mm day−1, logarithmic scale with zero reset at 8.64 × 10−3). The substellar
point is located at zero longitude and latitude in each plot. Surface water conditions are
confined to the dayside and the coldest regions on the nightside are offset from the poles. A
modest amount of moisture is advected to the nightside, resulting in weak snow precipitation
rates. Net evaporation occurs on the dayside in an annulus from ∼ 20 deg to ∼ 50 deg from
the substellar point, with net precipitation over the remainder of the globe.
– 19 –
Fig. 2.- Schematic plot of three idealized configurations envisioned for the surface water
inventory on a tidally-locked terrestrial planet. A view from the pole is shown, with the
nightside up and the dayside down. Exaggerated thicknesses are adopted for the ocean
(blue) and ice (white) layers. In the ice shelf configuration, the ice layer builds up on the
nightside but melting occurs at its base well before the ground is met.
In the ice sheet
configuration, the ice layer is partly grounded over the coldest regions on the nightside
(between the two radial dotted lines) and it connects to an ice shelf further away. In the
water-trapped configuration, most of the surface water is trapped in the nightside ice sheet,
with comparatively little water on the dayside. In all cases, the hydrological cycle is closed
by advection of atmospheric moisture from the dayside to the nightside, where it is deposited
as snow (gray arrows), and a return flow of water to the dayside in the ocean (yellow arrows).
Planets with less surface water and/or colder nightside temperatures, are more likely to be
in the water-trapped configuration.
– 20 –
Fig. 3.- Axisymmetric solutions for a thin isothermal flowing ice sheet. The solid line
is the solution for an ice sheet of 10000 km in radius, a uniform ice accumulation rate of
0.1 mm day−1 and an outer boundary thickness value of 1 km. The dash-dotted line, which
can hardly be distinguished from the solid line, corresponds to a similar solution except for
an outer boundary thickness value of 500 m. The dotted line corresponds to a reduced ice
accumulation rate of 0.01 mm day−1. The dashed line is the solution for an ice sheet of
5000 km in radius (with accumulation rate of 0.1 mm day−1 and outer boundary thickness
value of 500 m). These steady-state ice profiles carry an outward flux of ice at each radius
that is equal to the integrated ice accumulation rate within that radius.
– 21 –
Fig. 4.- A representative map of the ice thickness distribution (in meters) permitted by
the thermodynamic melting constraint in the Aquaplanet model, for a geothermal flux equal
to that of Earth. Most of the nightside ice has a maximal depth ∼ 1–1.5 km, with a colder
region of a few thousand km in extent permitting a thicker ice layer (up to 4.3 km). The
equivalent depth of this ice distribution, averaged over the entire globe, is 560 m.
|
1609.08215 | 1 | 1609 | 2016-09-26T22:39:15 | Probing for Evidence of Plumes on Europa with HST/STIS | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | Roth et al (2014a) reported evidence for plumes of water venting from a southern high latitude region on Europa - spectroscopic detection of off-limb line emission from the dissociation products of water. Here, we present Hubble Space Telescope (HST) direct images of Europa in the far ultraviolet (FUV) as it transited the smooth face of Jupiter, in order to measure absorption from gas or aerosols beyond the Europa limb. Out of ten observations we found three in which plume activity could be implicated. Two show statistically significant features at latitudes similar to Roth et al, and the third, at a more equatorial location. We consider potential systematic effects that might influence the statistical analysis and create artifacts, and are unable to find any that can definitively explain the features, although there are reasons to be cautious. If the apparent absorption features are real, the magnitude of implied outgassing is similar to that of the Roth et al feature, however the apparent activity appears more frequently in our data. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | PROBING FOR EVIDENCE OF PLUMES ON EUROPA WITH HST/STIS
Sparks, W.B.1, Hand, K.P.2, McGrath, M.A.3, Bergeron, E.1, Cracraft, M.1, Deustua, S.E.1
1 Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
2 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109
3SETI Institute, 189 N Bernardo Ave, Mountain View, CA 94043
Short title: PLUMES ON EUROPA
Corresponding author: [email protected]
ABSTRACT
Roth et al. (2014a) reported evidence for plumes of water venting from a southern high latitude
region on Europa – spectroscopic detection of off-limb line emission from the dissociation
products of water. Here, we present Hubble Space Telescope (HST) direct images of Europa in
the far ultraviolet (FUV) as it transited the smooth face of Jupiter, in order to measure absorption
from gas or aerosols beyond the Europa limb. Out of ten observations we found three in which
plume activity could be implicated. Two show statistically significant features at latitudes similar
to Roth et al., and the third, at a more equatorial location. We consider potential systematic
effects that might influence the statistical analysis and create artifacts, and are unable to find any
that can definitively explain the features, although there are reasons to be cautious. If the
apparent absorption features are real, the magnitude of implied outgassing is similar to that of the
Roth et al. feature, however the apparent activity appears more frequently in our data.
KEYWORDS: planets and satellites: general
1. INTRODUCTION
Europa is one of the most compelling astrobiological targets in the Solar System. The
combination of geological, compositional, gravity, and induced magnetic field measurements all
indicate a contemporary global saline liquid water ocean of ~100 km in depth (Anderson et al.,
1998; Pappalardo et al., 1998; Kivelson et al., 2000; Zimmer et al., 2000; Hand & Chyba, 2007).
Cycling of the ocean with a silicate seafloor and oxidant laden surface ice could yield an ocean
rich with the elements and chemical energy needed to sustain life (Chyba 2000; Chyba & Hand,
1
2001; Hand et al., 2007; Hand et al., 2009). Europa is therefore one of the most plausible sites in
the Solar System beyond Earth where life could exist. With Roth et al. (2014a)'s evidence that
plumes of water may be emanating from Europa's surface, the possibility arises that material
from Europa's ocean could be ejected out into space and onto Europa's surface, providing direct
access to ocean material without the need to drill through the many kilometers of Europa's ice
shell. Furthermore, plume activity would indicate that Europa is geologically active in the
modern epoch. Therefore, it is of critical importance that additional observations and techniques
for assessing plume activity be undertaken.
Europa possesses a tenuous atmosphere and, because of its location deep within the Jovian
magnetosphere, auroral activity in the form of far ultraviolet hydrogen and oxygen line emission
occurs from the interaction of plasma electrons with the thin gases around the satellite (Hall et al.
1995; McGrath et al. 2009). Though the exosphere of Europa arises from material escaping from
the surface, its basic properties such as areal coverage, density, thermal structure, and spatial and
temporal variability are poorly understood (McGrath et al., 2009; Roth et al., 2015).
Evidence for off-limb far ultraviolet oxygen and hydrogen emission, dissociation products of
water, was inferred by Roth et al. (2014a) to be the result of plume activity. The detection
comprises a single 4-σ event, and remains to be validated by an independent observational
approach (or even the same approach; Roth et al., 2014b). The intriguing possibility that plumes
and active cryovolcanism are present on Europa was considered previously (Fagents et al., 2000;
Fagents et al., 2003). Fagents et al. (2000) modeled volatile gas and particle-rich plumes in an
effort to explain a variety of low-albedo features on Europa. In that work, which also considered
the dynamics of Io's observed plumes, the greatest height to which Europa plumes were
expected to reach was ~100 km. This height corresponded to gas-dominated plumes with
eruption velocities of ~600 m s-1. They argue that more realistic values for ejection velocities and
plume compositions yield plumes with heights of 1 to < 25 km.
Significantly, the observations by Roth et al. (2014a) necessitate plumes of water vapor that
reach heights of ~200 km. This would require an initial eruption velocity of 700 m s-1, which is
hard to reconcile with the Fagents et al. (2000) work, especially given that the species reaching
the highest altitudes in those models were the dissolved and devolatilized gases possibly trapped
in the water and ice fractures (e.g. CO2, CO, NH3, SO2). At Enceladus, where the Cassini
spacecraft has directly observed plumes (Porco et al., 2006), the water gas velocities are in the
range of 300-500 m s-1 (Waite et al., 2006; Tian et al., 2007; Brilliantov et al., 2008). For water
molecules to achieve velocities of ~700 m s-1 on Europa requires vent fractures with surface
temperatures of >230 K (Roth et al., 2014a). Though not impossible, such temperature and
corresponding plume heights are well above Europa's ~100 K surface temperature, and well
below the eutectic temperature for any salt-rich solution that might suppress the freezing
temperature of the plume source material (Kargel et al., 2000).
Here we seek to further investigate the existence of plumes on Europa by using a different HST
observing strategy than that used by Roth et al; we use HST direct imaging observations of
Europa transiting in front of Jupiter, with Europa limb absorptions of Jupiter's reflected light as a
possible indication of plumes. In the far ultraviolet, the face of Jupiter is smooth, dominated in
appearance by scattering from high level atmospheric hazes in the Jovian atmosphere. Not only
that, but the scattering cross-sections of molecules of interest – H2O, O2 primarily – are high and
2
the spatial resolution of HST is near its highest. The diffraction limit of HST at 150 nm is
λ/D≈13 millarcseconds (mas), where λ is the wavelength and D is the HST diameter. Although
HST point spread function (PSF) at these wavelengths is significantly degraded relative to pure
diffraction limited performance (see below), the images retain information at this very high
spatial resolution. At a distance of 4 AU, 13 mas corresponds to 38 km, which we exploited by
acquiring data in the high resolution time-tag imaging mode of the Space Telescope Imaging
Spectrograph (STIS)
2. OBSERVATIONS
Europa was observed with the FUV multi-anode microchannel array (MAMA) on STIS using
time-tag imaging mode, and the F25SRF2 filter which excludes geocoronal Lyman α. The
effective wavelength of this filter is ~150 nm, although there is a red leak discussed below. The
time-tag imaging mode provides a position and time for every detected photon event, with a time
resolution of 125 µs. For time-tag observations, the STIS memory is divided into two 8MB
buffers, each of which can hold up to 2 × 106 events. If the cadence between scheduled buffer
dumps is at least 99 seconds, then one buffer can be actively recording new events, while
previously recorded events in the other buffer are being written to an HST onboard data recorder.
However, in cases where Jupiter filled a large fraction of the detector, the photon event rate was
such that the buffer filled in less than 99 sec, and there was a pause in the data acquisition while
the buffer was read into data storage, resulting in gaps in the data acquisition sequences. We
typically acquired ~40−50×106 photon events per image. Table 1 presents the exposure time for
which active data acquisition occurred.
The MAMA detectors record time-tag data in "highres" mode, a 2048×2048 x-y coordinate
frame with twice the spatial sampling of a standard "accum" image. The time-tag pixel size is
approximately 12 mas (Biretta et al. 2016, §11.1.2).
The primary HST tracking was centered on Europa, with an additional moving target "Level 3"
drift imposed to move the location of the Europa image across the detector during the course of
the observation. This was to minimize artifacts arising from fine-structure irregularities in the
detector sensitivity. The time-tag approach allowed us to back-out the motion of Europa to
reconstruct images in the Europa (or other) coordinate frames by applying a coordinate
transformation to the x-y values in the time-tag datafile, without the necessity for any spatial
resampling.
We observed ten transits of Europa across the face of Jupiter spanning over a year. We also
acquired seven images out of transit with the geometry illustrated in Fig. 1. The primary purpose
of the out of transit images was to enable us to accurately model the appearance of Europa in the
FUV, crucial in trying to model the transits themselves. The observations were designed to be
taken at different telescope roll angles, but any one observation, including the acquisition
procedure, is at the same roll angle and did not change throughout the exposure. Data
accumulation begins once the guide star acquisition is complete. All transit observations have
essentially the same viewing perspective by necessity since Europa is tidally locked in its orbit
about Jupiter.
3
3. METHODS
3.1 ASSEMBLING THE IMAGES
Each observation resulted in a single file of photon events, which we expanded to include
additional information such as new coordinate systems, tracking information, sky levels, the
detector pixel flat-field value, and the location of Europa as a function of time. We refer to these
expanded event files as "basetag" files. A transit image of Europa is derived by transforming the
(x,y,t) values for each photon event into a frame in which Europa is at rest. We chose two
primary coordinate systems: one fixed in detector coordinates, with the x,y values corrected for
geometric distortion of the STIS FUV MAMA, and the Level 3 moving target drift removed, and
the other, a frame in which Europa is oriented with the Europa North pole up and the spatial
scale fixed at 35 km per pixel. These "35km" images were the principal images with which we
worked. In the 35 km pixel frame, the radius of Europa is 44.6 pixels. We emphasize that
because the data are time-tag, no image resampling is involved in switching between coordinate
systems: the different coordinates for each photon are stored as different columns in the basetag
file (there is a small contribution to the noise from digitization of the 12 mas pixel scale,
negligible in our statistical analysis which uses binned data).
The task of accumulating images from the time-tag data involves first choosing a spatial
coordinate system, based on a transformation of the original set of (x,y,t) events, and secondly,
realizing that an image is a histogram of the index value corresponding to location (x,y) in the
chosen coordinate frame. That is, if there are N events with unique coordinates (x,y), then the
image intensity value is N at location (x,y). A subtlety arises when we additionally include the
STIS flat-field response. Each photon event occurs at a known location on the detector, and the
detector pixel flat field response ("p-flat"), or relative sensitivity, of that location is known. If the
photon is detected in a region of low sensitivity, it needs to be given higher weight than a photon
that arrives in a region of higher sensitivity. To do this, if the pixel p-flat value is f, then instead
of counting "1" per event, we count "1/f" per event when accumulating the image from the time-
tag file. This is equivalent to applying a standard flat field to the data in the case where there is
no target motion or drift. To allow for various tracking solutions, we imbedded the photon events
into images with pixel dimensions 4096×4096, double the size of the raw data coordinate
system.
To create images in the reference frame of Europa, we compared the HST tracking solution
available from the HST jitter files to the HORIZONS ephemeris. Using these two pieces of
information, we predicted the (x,y) position of the Europa image in the geometrically corrected
detector frame. In doing so, we noticed that a small error in the HST tracking was present – the
track of Europa on the detector had a curvature resulting in deviations of order one pixel for
some of the data, less for the majority. Since we are working with time-tag data, this was
completely removed by a coordinate transformation that followed the track of the Europa image
accurately on the detector. This procedure provided a relative accuracy for the Europa location
within a single observation of significantly better than a pixel. The position of the Europa image
in geometrically corrected (x,y) coordinates was recorded as a polynomial in the basetag header.
The absolute position of Europa on the detector is subject to uncertainties in the guide star
catalog, which can cause a shift of the image away from the nominal location by a few tenths of
4
an arcsec. Hence, having obtained an image of Europa in corrected detector coordinates,
nominally located at the image center, we measured its actual position in two ways. For the
transit images the most effective procedure was to cross-correlate the images with a model of the
image (§3.2), and then we adjusted the position slightly by eye if necessary so that any residuals
in comparison to the model appeared symmetric. By comparing the cross-correlation results to
estimates done by eye, we found the image centering was good to approximately one pixel.
Shifts of the model relative to the data by one pixel introduce noticeable asymmetries in their
ratio. For out of transit images, we contoured the image with axis ratio and center as free
parameters at a relatively low level compared to the peak count rate. This gives a highly precise
measurement, but nevertheless could be slightly biased by an asymmetric light distribution. We
found a consistent image elongation of ~2%, which we attributed to the convolution of the
asymmetric light distribution with the complex FUV PSF. We considered and rejected
centroiding, since the trailing hemisphere is approximately a factor of two darker than the
leading hemisphere; this biases the centroid towards the leading edge by several pixels.
After accumulating a Europa transit image, relatively low level band structures in the
background image of Jupiter remain. To estimate the optical depth of any off-limb features of
Europa, we divided the transit image by an empirically constructed model of the background
Jovian light. In the FUV, the face of Jupiter in the equatorial regions is relatively smooth to
begin with. Perpendicular to the Jovian cloud belts, the brightness variation had an RMS
brightness variation of ≈5%, while along the belts, the dispersion was consistent with Poisson
noise. In the frame in which Europa is at rest, additional smoothing took place as Jupiter rotated
behind Europa, smearing the Jupiter image relative to the Europa one. To model the appearance
of Jupiter for the transit observation, we identified a point on the Jovian surface roughly centered
on Europa during the transit, and then constructed an image using coordinate transformations in
which that point on the Jovian surface is at rest. In this frame, Europa drifted across the field of
view during the observation. We then built a series of images in the Jovian frame each of
duration 1 sec, and masked out the data within a circular region with diameter 1.2× the diameter
of Europa. We also created an exposure time image, allowing for time intervals where data
acquisition was paused due to buffer dumps, and omitted the path of Europa across Jupiter.
Dividing the summed Jupiter images by the exposure time image, we obtained an image of
Jupiter free of the presence of Europa, which we used as the basis of an empirical model image
of Jupiter.
To determine the appearance of Jupiter in each Europa-frame transit image, we created an image
stack with 1 second slices in the Europa rest frame, using the Jupiter countrate image shifted
according to the relative motion of Europa and Jupiter. We set buffer dump periods to zero, but
otherwise used the entire Jupiter image. The sum of the image slices, divided by the equivalent
exposure time yielded a model of the smeared Jovian background for comparison to the transit
observation. After division by this empirical model, the belt structure was not present at a level
above the Poisson noise. Since these Jovian models, and the actual Jovian images, were smeared
in the Europa frame due to the relative motions of Europa and Jupiter, and because they were
intrinsically smooth relative to the noise level of the data, we concluded that they were not
introducing fine structure around the Europa limb.
5
This process worked well for the majority of transit observations, though there are some caveats
for those observations near the Jovian limb. The relative motion of Europa and the background
Jovian cloud tops is dominated by Jupiter's rotation. Near the limb, however, the apparent
movement due to Jupiter's rotation decreases, and additionally the surface brightness of a
location on Jupiter changes as it moves away from, or towards, the limb. The quality of the
resulting models was somewhat inferior in these cases, although we were able to make the
necessary models for all observations.
For all images, we measured the sky background in regions away from both Jupiter and Europa.
The sky brightness was measured at 200 second intervals through the orbit, and a total
background sky level was subtracted from the images prior to processing (though included
appropriately in the noise models). There are strong variations in the sky background as HST
approaches the Earth limb.
3.2 MODELING THE OBSERVATIONS
To assess the likelihood of image artifacts arising due to the combination of albedo fine structure
on the surface of Europa, and the optics of HST, we generated a series of models of Europa and
convolved them with representations of the HST PSF. The phase angle of Europa varied from
≈3° to ≈11° which had a significant influence on the illumination pattern, which we also
modeled.
Qualitatively, the Europa disk appearance in the FUV images is similar to the optical, with the
same large scale overall albedo variations: a dark trailing hemisphere and a bright leading one.
We did not see the albedo inversion shown in Figure 4 of McGrath et al. (2009), described in
more detail by Roth et al. (2014a), which is not unexpected since that appears at shorter
wavelength.
The Europa model was derived from the 500 m resolution Galileo mosaic available from the US
Geological Survey1, which we mapped onto a sphere matched to the observing configuration for
each visit. We neglected rotation of Europa during an observation. To allow for differences
between the FUV and visible morphology, we adjusted the "contrast" of the Galileo image by a
factor C such that 𝐺𝐺′=𝐶𝐶(𝐺𝐺−<𝐺𝐺>)+<𝐺𝐺>, where G is the original image and <G>, its
mean. These contrast adjusted Galileo images were then multiplied by an illumination function,
derived from the known geometry of the observation relative to the Sun, and the generalized
Lambertian bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) described in Oren & Nayar
(1994). This reflectance model is physically motivated, based on a macroscopic distribution of
Lambertian facets (length scale >> wavelength), similar to the approach of Torrance & Sparrow
(1967) for specular facets. The model is parameterized by its "roughness", which is the standard
deviation of the angle distribution of facets. Rougher models have a flatter surface brightness
profile, with sharper edges.
We tested a variety of PSFs: empirical and theoretically modeled using the TinyTim software
package (Krist et al., 2011). The core of the PSF retains the diffraction limited width, but as
aberrations increase relative to the wavelength, energy is redistributed from the core into Airy
1 http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/search/details/Europa/Voyager-Galileo/Europa_Voyager_GalileoSSI_global_mosaic_500m/cub
6
rings at greater radii. Hence, images retain the fine detail of the diffraction limit, but overlaid on
that is a blurring from the broad wings of the PSF. We combined a PSF generated for the default
focus position and STIS F25SRF2 filter parameters covering 15 wavelengths in the range 125
nm to 185 nm, which does not include a red leak element, with a 300 nm PSF to mimic the red
leak, in the proportion 66% to 34%, which we estimated to be the proportion of counts from the
Jovian reflected light spectrum bluewards and redwards of 200 nm respectively, to
approximately model the red leak. The actual value of the red leak is very uncertain.
Empirically, the smooth appearance of Jupiter, and the fact that the ice of Europa appeared
darker than the clouds of Jupiter, argues that we were at least dominated by FUV photons in the
images, consistent with this red leak estimate. At optical wavelengths, the clouds of Jupiter
exhibit much higher contrast and the albedo of water ice (on Europa) is extremely high.
Encircled energy data for the STIS F25SRF2 PSF are available in the STIS Instrument
Handbook (Biretta et al., 2016, see imaging reference material). The residual HST RMS
wavefront error is in the range 25−70 nm, depending on field location, wavelength, focus,
individual instrument optics, etc. (Krist & Burrows 1995; Hartig priv. comm.), which for a low
25 nm error implies a Strehl ratio (ratio of PSF peak to the theoretical diffraction limit) ≈33% at
150 nm or an encircled energy 28% of the total within the first Airy ring, radius 16 mas. The
aberrations used by TinyTim yield a lower Strehl: for our composite PSF the encircled energy
within a fiducial radius of 35 mas (~5 pixel diameter) is ≈30%. The encircled energy within this
radius for the red leak element is 39% since the amplitude of the aberrations relative to the
wavelength of observation declines to the red. We compared radial profiles of models of two of
the out of transit Europa images convolved with the composite PSF and the individual red and
blue components, and found that the data match more closely to the convolution with the red
(sharper) PSF, and that the composite PSF is slightly too pessimistic. This could be due to either
a small mismatch between the assumed aberration model of TinyTim and the actual HST optics,
or a higher fraction of red leak for the icy surface of Europa than assumed. Hence, there is
significant energy available at resolutions at or close to the telescope diffraction limit.
Quantitatively, the amplitude of fine structure on these scales is diminished by approximately the
fraction of energy in the PSF core ≈0.3−0.4, which we correct for in §4 Results, below.
Empirical PSFs were also obtained from STIS F25SRF2 observations of NGC6681 which
contain numerous individual stellar images. Thirty-one separate observations used exposure
times ranging from 110 to 2600 seconds. Stars were selected to be in the area of the detector
where the Europa data were obtained, and were ranked according to the HST focus model
available at http://www.stsci.edu/hst/observatory/focus/FocusModel. We selected 10 relatively
high S/N stellar images across a wide range of focus for exploration of the data, using as
empirical PSFs either the one nearest in focus to the Europa observation, or the average of the
PSFs within the focus range of the Europa observation. In the end, the empirical PSF proved too
diffuse in comparison to the actual data, due to resampling necessary in their preparation,
coupled to inadequate S/N. Hence, although it is an idealization with inevitable small
mismatches to the real PSF, we used the composite TinyTim PSF described above as our input
for the data modeling, and assumed it was unchanged within a visit and from visit to visit in the
detector coordinate frame.
7
For comparison to the data, for each visit, we developed a complete model of the scene allowing
for the (slightly) different view of Europa, the differing illumination pattern due to the Europa
phase angle, the Jovian background and the convolving PSF. For all visits individually, we
multiplied a contrast enhanced Galileo image projected onto a sphere, by the illumination pattern
of known geometry and chosen roughness. The transit models included an empirically
determined image of Jupiter, smeared by the relative motions of Jupiter and Europa. The central
surface brightness of the Europa model (R<0.5RE), was matched to the data self-consistently by
convolving the model images of Europa and Jupiter (with a gap for Europa) separately, to
account for the effect of the PSF spilling light from Jupiter across the Europa image. For the out
of transit images, we assumed the background sky was constant, tweaking the original
measurement according to the residual sky measured in the range 1.5−3RE. Fig. 3 illustrates the
construction of the models.
For each observation, we generated a grid of models with a range of roughness in the range 0−1,
a range of contrast enhancement from -1 to +3, and three PSFs: TinyTim, empirical nearest
neighbor, and empirical range. We measured the reduced χ2 for "data minus model" to derive a
fit for roughness and contrast, and spatially cross-correlated the data and model using the best fit
parameters to adjust the position of the model relative to the data. Following this iterative step,
we re-derived the reduced χ2 as a function of roughness, σ, and contrast, C, and found best-fit
values of σ=0.57±0.02 and contrast C=1.61±0.06 using the Tiny Tim PSF. The average reduced
χ2≈1.12 with a range 0.98 to 1.32, omitting the leading and trailing hemisphere images which
have strong "edge effects" around the Europa limb. Departures from unity were likely dominated
by mismatches between the assumption that the visual albedo is directly proportional to the
FUV, and that the PSF was well-represented by the Tiny Tim PSF. Nevertheless, the final
models seemed acceptable, Fig. 4.
A value of σ=0.57, corresponding to a standard deviation of slopes of 32°, would be considered
very rough. It is not our intent to determine the surface characteristics of Europa from this
analysis, since alternative scattering models may apply (Goguen et al., 2010). They find a
comparable root mean square slope distribution for the lunar highlands of ≈35° derived from
optical observations, but show that an equally good fit to the photometry can be obtained with
flat regolith, and multiple scattering between regolith particles on the microscopic scale. Here we
were less concerned with the physical interpretation of the model, and were primarily concerned
that the model empirically described the appearance of Europa to an acceptable degree of
accuracy.
3.3 STATISTICAL METHODS AND RESULTS
For the statistical analysis to examine evidence for plumes, we worked with the transit
observations. We analyzed the data in a variety of different ways. For the transit observations,
the goal was to determine a fractional absorption against the smooth background light of Jupiter.
Hence we worked with the data image divided by the convolved model, and for additional
insights, we also inspected the data divided by a circularly symmetric azimuthally averaged
version of the data itself (i.e. free of model assumptions). That is, we used ratio images that
provide a measure of, or limit to, the optical depth of the Europa exosphere as Europa transits
8
using a box of side n pixels, i.e. a total of N=n2 pixels, then to obtain the average optical depth
Jupiter, together with the original images that gave observed counts for deriving Poisson
statistics.
If the background light intensity (of light scattered by Jupiter) is I0(i,j) at each pixel in the image
in the vicinity of Europa, and if the observed surface brightness is modified by a plume with
optical depth τ(i,j), then the observed brightness will be 𝐼𝐼𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜(𝑖𝑖,𝑗𝑗)= 𝐼𝐼0(𝑖𝑖,𝑗𝑗)𝑒𝑒−τ(i,j). For small
optical depth τ, and omitting the (i,j) subscript for clarity, 𝐼𝐼𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜≈ 𝐼𝐼0(1− τ). If we bin the data
<τ> we take one minus the average of the ratio of observed flux to background flux 〈τ〉=1−
〈𝐼𝐼𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝐼𝐼0� 〉 (as opposed to 1−<𝐼𝐼𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜>/<𝐼𝐼0> which would give a luminosity weighted optical
depth is τ=−ln (𝐼𝐼𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝐼𝐼0� ) however use of this quantity in the statistical comparisons would
obtained if 〈τ〉=1−〈𝐼𝐼𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝐼𝐼0� 〉 as τ′=〈τ〉(1+〈τ〉2�).
unnecessarily introduce a complex error distribution: the errors on Iobs are straightforwardly and
correctly estimated from Poisson statistics. A first order correction τ' to the optical depth may be
depth estimate, biasing the measurement to low values of τ). An exact estimate of the optical
Our initial goal was, for each image, to test whether the data are statistically consistent with the
observation model described above, given the Poisson noise statistics appropriate to the image.
The sky-subtracted data images in 35 km coordinate space were therefore divided by the model
of the observation. The model included a reconstruction of the appearance of Jupiter, which
flattened the off-limb zone, and yielded the optical depth estimate. Since we were testing for
departures of the data Iobs from the model image I0, we used the noiseless model image, with the
addition of the measured sky pedestal, as the basis of estimate for the Poisson count uncertainty.
We tested the significance of the departure of the ratio data-to-model by calculating an estimate
of the uncertainty σ on the average 〈𝐼𝐼𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝐼𝐼0� 〉. The uncertainty on 〈𝐼𝐼𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝐼𝐼0� 〉 is given by the
the box σ�〈𝐼𝐼𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝐼𝐼0� 〉�=1𝑛𝑛�〈1𝐼𝐼0� 〉+𝑆𝑆.〈1𝐼𝐼02� 〉. Hence we derived a z statistic 𝑧𝑧=(〈𝐼𝐼𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝐼𝐼0� 〉−
1)/σ which we assumed was normally distributed to test for departures from a ratio value of
assumption that the uncertainty on an individual pixel is σ2(Iobs)=(I0+S) where S is the sky level
per pixel. Then it follows that within a box of side n pixels the uncertainty on the mean within
one, i.e. optical depth zero. For the transit observations, I0 was typically 15−20 counts per pixel,
so the Poisson distribution was adequately approximated by the normal distribution, even for no
binning. It was very well approximated by the normal distribution for modest amounts of binning
(counts in the hundreds), see Table 2. We excluded pixels interior to the limb of Europa in the
binning of points close to the limb.
To test the assumption of Poisson (normal) statistics, we established a sparse grid with sampling
points spaced by the binning box size plus one, in the region of the image between 2.0 and 4.0
RE. The means and standard deviations of the z statistics for these grids are reported in Table 2.
9
4. RESULTS
Figures 5−14 show the results of the analysis. These images are the 512×512 pixels centered on
Europa in the 35 km frame, with the Europa North pole up. On the left, we show the data image
divided by the model image. A circle indicates the limb of Europa. On the right there is an image
of the probability that the data are consistent with the model for the off-limb region (we blanked
out the Europa disk as there were known mismatches between the model and data that were
statistically significant, but which are not relevant to the off-limb transmission study). The grey
scale on the left hand image ranges from 0.8 to 1.2, i.e. black would correspond to 20% decrease
in <I/I0>, or τ=0.22. If the probability is p that the data and model are consistent, for a one-sided
test, then the image on the right hand side is an image of -log10(p) scaled from zero to 5.5, i.e. p
range 1 to 10-5.5≈3.2×10-6.
For 512×512 random data points, we expect one outlier at z≈4.47 σ, corresponding to a
probability of p≈3.8×10-6, i.e. –log10 p≈5.4. For a 5×5 binning factor, the number of independent
data points in the image is reduced by a factor 25× and we expect to see one outlier for z≈3.7 σ,
corresponding to a probability of 0.95×10-4, i.e. –log10 p≈4.0 (as expected for approximately
100×100 independent data points). There are three images which have off-limb data points
within 1.25× the radius of Europa whose z, or equivalently -log10 p, values exceed this threshold.
These are the transit images taken on January 26, 2014, March 17, 2014 and April 4, 2014 (see
Fig. 15 and Fig. 16). The other images do not have outlier candidates by this criterion. We now
look at each of these images in turn.
At face value, inspecting the January 26, 2014 image, oc7u02g2q, there are three patches of
absorption in the same latitude zone that Roth et al. (2014a) found evidence of an emission line
plume, though with sub-longitude ≈181° rather than the ≈93° of Roth et al. (2014a), Figs. 15 and
21 below. If we identify the plume region as -40°<latitude<-60°, radius 1.0−1.25 RE, the
maximum z-value for the ratio of the data to the model is z≈3.9 for 5×5 binning, and z≈4.0 for
7×7 binning in this region, i.e. a ≈4 σ significance, and a formal probability of chance occurrence
≈4×10-5.
Another way to look at this probability is to consider a search region close to the Europa limb. If
we take an annulus of width 6 pixels (210 km), the annulus contains 1681 pixels, or 67 5x5 bins,
~34 7x7 regions. Hence the probability of obtaining a random fluctuation as large as observed
with 67 or 34 trials (i.e. within the annulus close to the Europa limb) given a probability of
≈4×10-5 per trial is only ≈0.0027 (0.3%) or ≈0.0014 (0.1%) for the two bin factors. These would
both generally be considered statistically significant.
Independent of the models, the basic unprocessed transit image shows dark spikes starting at the
limb of Europa around latitude ≈-60° and extending, in the most prominent case, to a height of
≈6 pixels or 220 km. Fig. 17 shows both the 35 km space (where the bands of Jupiter are
horizontal) and detector space (where the bands of Jupiter are at an angle of ~60°) versions of the
transit image prior to dividing by any models or images of Jupiter.
10
To formalize a model independent statistic, we divided the data by a circularly symmetric
azimuthally averaged image, generated from the original data after division by the Jupiter model,
and computed a probability following the procedures described earlier, see Fig. 18. The
probability image indicates that the dark features remain statistically significant at a slightly
higher significance, z≈4.1 for 5×5 binning, and z≈4.8 for 7×7 binning, in this model independent
approach, and that we are not introducing artifacts during the modeling process. Further, it may
be noted that the dark spikes do not appear adjacent to the darkest part of the trailing hemisphere,
and they appear to have a sharp edge at the limb suggesting an origin, if real, slightly over the
horizon.
As another control, the observation model with Poisson noise added was divided by the model of
Jupiter to flatten out the band structure prior to azimuthal averaging. The noisy model was then
divided by its azimuthal average to reveal whether spurious off-limb features appear. No off-
limb features were apparent.
The second dataset we examine is ochz03dwq obtained on March 17, 2014. There is a dark spot
at latitude 16.5°S, very close to the limb on the Western side but apparently protruding slightly
from the limb, longitude ~275°. The protrusion is also visible in the model-independent
circularly symmetric profile subtracted image, Figs. 19. Formally, the data divided by the model
yields a significance level of z≈4.4 for 5×5 binning, a probability of chance occurrence
p≈4.8×10-6.
To test for a problem with the model, we divided this image (after division by the Jupiter model)
by the median of the other nine transit images, treated identically, since the view of Europa in
transit is always very similar. The dark spot remained in this ratio. To estimate its significance,
we derived an uncertainty estimate on the ratio using standard propagation of errors, assuming
that the error on the median was √(π/2) times the error on the mean, as it is for a Gaussian
distribution. Fig. 20 shows the data points in the image beyond the limb of Europa normalized by
the error estimate, with the position of the dark spot indicated. Again, the protrusion appears to
be statistically significant, with z≈6.6, though since this quantity is the ratio of two random
variables, the distribution is not formally Gaussian, although the zero mean unit dispersion
Gaussian included for comparison does appears to be quite a good description of the distribution.
Empirically, the patch under discussion is the darkest spot on the image.
In addition, these data show similar darkenings off-limb in the south polar zone to the January
26, 2014 image: as for that image, there are two darker patches in the same latitude range at polar
angles 236 and 260°, with z≈4.0.
Image ochz05ftq was obtained on April 4, 2014. It shows a single dark spot at latitude 40°S on
the trailing hemisphere, polar angle 220°, see Figs. 9 & 15. With 5×5 binning, it is at about 4.5 σ,
comparable to, or even slightly more significant than, the other candidate detections. We are
concerned that the rim of apparently darker material in this image is mirrored in part by a rim of
brighter material on the opposite side of Europa, seen as a dark area in the probability maps.
Though not at such a strong significance level, this bright rim could indicate a problem in the
data processing. This image also has a (small) number of outliers elsewhere in the field of view,
Table 2.
11
5. SYSTEMATIC ERRORS AND CONCERNS
Even if the data show statistically significant absorption features according to the photon
statistical analysis above, which assumes independent randomly distributed data points, it is
conceivable that systematic effects may come into play to introduce artifacts and cast doubt upon
the reality of the dark patches. We step through a range of potential sources of systematic error.
None of these appear to be responsible for the features.
Detector non-Poisson behavior: If the counting statistics were not Poisson, but influenced in
some fashion by the physics of the detection process or reliability of the MAMA counting
methods, then there may be random fluctuations larger than the Poisson distribution would
predict. Negative fluctuations of this sort could be mistaken for plumes. Table 2 shows, however,
that the number of 4.5 σ outliers in the control region beyond 1.5 RE are essentially as expected
from Poisson statistics. We expect one event by chance at 4.47 σ for 512x512 trials. We see zero
for six of the images, 1 for two of them and 3 for two images. We conclude that there is not a
tendency for the detector to exhibit anomalous dark spots in general, and for such dark spots to
congregate around the Europa limb demands a different explanation. Overall, the dispersion of
the normalized z statistics is within 2−3% of the Poisson estimate (1.8% for 5×5 binning, and
2.3% for 7×7), and the mean is close to zero 0.05−0.06, Table 2. The remaining residuals are
likely due to imperfectly modeled Jupiter band structure, from inspection of Figs. 5−14. Thus
from the statistics of the control region, there is no compelling evidence that the detector has
non-Poisson counting behavior.
A complex and variable point spread function: Fig. 2 illustrated the complexity of the FUV PSF.
For a root mean square wavefront error of ≈25 nm for the HST corrected optics, the estimated
Strehl ratio is ≈0.33, significantly below diffraction limited performance. This manifests itself as
a tight core, retaining diffraction limited information, but with substantial "power" in the wings
of the PSF. To make matters worse, there is a contribution to the PSF from the only
approximately known red leak, which also introduces a scene-dependence to the PSF. That is,
the regions of high albedo exposed ice, the darker trailing hemisphere material and the reflected
light from Jupiter each must have a slightly different PSF. Further, the HST focus changes
through an observation, introducing a time dependence to the PSF. Hence it is not possible to
know accurately the exact PSF for each part of the image at all times.
However, when convolving the complex PSF with the extended halo of Jovian light in the transit
images, the effect of the substantial PSF wings is to smooth the resulting image, rather than to
introduce sharp features such as the candidate plume observations, as discussed in §3.2.
Detector defects: There are a number of places on the STIS MAMA detector where defects are
evident, and at high resolution, the appearance of the detector p-flat is of a honeycomb grid with
significant amplitude variations through the grid lines. We addressed this in two ways. Firstly,
we used our own observations of Jupiter, to self-consistently derive an improved p-flat
calibration, which by definition is appropriate to the time frame of our observations. Secondly,
we used the Level 3 moving target specification for HST tracking to drift the image of Europa
across the detector during the observation. Hence any localized detector defects and the
honeycomb grid, were smeared out over the length of the drift. After gaining experience of these
12
issues, we adopted a primary pointing of Europa to be well away from detector defects. The dark
features in question (putative plumes) are significantly more localized than Level 3 smeared
detector defects, and they are in a different position angle to the imposed tracking drift. We
inspected the effective p-flat for each observation and did not see any defects coincident with
candidate absorption features.
Model mismatches to the data: The comparison model is not perfect – we fitted for contrast and
illumination function, and for the location of Europa within the image as described, and derived
the underlying image of Jupiter empirically and self-consistently from the data. We checked for
the effect of centering errors by eye on two of the candidate plume images, and found that the
appearance of the image is robust against shifts of order one to two pixels, by which time the
asymmetries in the ratio of data to model are noticeable. The contrast value and illumination
functions were fitted by least squares and have relatively small errors, quoted above. Small
departures from these fitted parameters do not affect the appearance of off-limb structure in
comparison with the data: we tried several version of the fits depending on which PSF was used
and found no substantial difference in the appearance of the ratio images.
There are additional reasons to be cautious:
The first image that shows apparent off-limb structure, oc7u02g2q, used the smallest Level 3
drift which means detector features are more pronounced in the flat field.
The darkest spot in ochz03dwq is close to, though not exactly coincident with the darkest part of
the Europa disk. It is also apparent on the image with the largest sublongitude, indicating we are
seeing further "around" the dark trailing hemisphere by ~1.5 degrees. Equivalently, this image is
the one with Europa closest to the Jovian limb, making correction for the Jovian background
harder.
The individual best optical depth (1-σ) limit is 0.033 for 7×7 binning in oc7u02g2q. While this
may seem to be good, if there are weak systematics, the higher sensitivity could render them
more statistically significant.
All features are in roughly, but not exactly, the same area of Europa – a strength yielding insight
into the physics of Europa, or an indication of an unsolved imaging problem?
Despite almost contemporaneous observations with oc7u02g2q (January 26, 2014) during early
2014, Roth et al. (2014b) failed to detect any plume activity. They observed Europa twice,
January 22 and February 2, 2014, indicated on Fig. 16, and derived only upper limits. The
difference does not appear to be a geometric viewing perspective difference. All transit
observations have subobserver longitude ≈180°, and the 2014 Roth data were acquired with
subobserver longitude in the range 117−157°, which, coupled to the extreme polar latitudes
involved, means the features ought to have been visible to Roth et al. (2014b). There are possible
physical explanations, which we return to in the discussion, however the apparent inconsistency
gives us pause, and represents a cause for concern.
13
6. DISCUSSION
6.1 QUANTITATIVE IMPLICATIONS
If the statistically significant regions are due to plumes, then we can quantify their properties,
with the caveat that these numbers are to be treated with caution, and apply only if the features
are actually plumes and not artifacts. Table 2 gives the mean dispersion in the bright region
surrounding Europa (i.e. the transit image divided by the model of Jupiter). This may be
interpreted as the "1-σ" optical depth limit, for which the average value is 0.056 and 0.04
respectively for 5×5 and 7×7 binning. The individual best limit (1-σ) is 0.033 for 7×7 binning in
oc7u02g2q, which also has the second best spatial resolution and is one of the images which
appears to show statistically significant off-limb features. The actual candidate features were
seen at ≈4.5 σ, corresponding to a lower detection limit of τ≈0.15−0.25. There is an additional
correction factor due to the broad wings of the PSF, as discussed in §3.2. This correction factor is
size dependent, larger features requiring smaller correction. By simulating a grid of Gaussian
patches of absorption with a range of optical depth and length scale, we found that for the length
scales of interest, a factor of ≈2.3−3.3 to scale the as-seen integrated extinction over the patch, to
the underlying total, was appropriate, corresponding to a PSF with ≈37% of its energy in the
compact core (see §3.2). Hence, taking the mean factor 2.8× and correcting the optical depth, we
derived a lowest detectable limit of intrinsic optical depth of τ≈0.4. We illustrate one of these
models below, applied to the data of March 17, 2014.
To quantify the amount of water required to produce a patch of absorption, we looked at both
molecular and ice particle cross-sections. The STIS FUV MAMA detector has a significant red
leak. Using the component level software package pysynphot, with a Solar spectrum, we
calculated that the fraction of detected photons with wavelength longer than 200 nm is
approximately 34%. This acts to dilute the effective cross-section of absorbing molecules,
typically highest in the FUV region, which represents ≈66% of detected photons. The actual
value of the red leak is very uncertain − this value was obtained using pre-launch component
throughput curves; it has not been calibrated on orbit or as a function of time. Qualitatively,
however, the smooth appearance of Jupiter, and dark appearance of Europa indicate that the
image is dominated by the FUV spectrum and not the red leak.
To obtain an effective cross section for H2O, in light of these considerations, we derived a
countrate-weighted mean cross section using the pysynphot spectrum together with the cross-
section as a function of wavelength. The resulting wavelength averaged weighted cross-section
was σ(H2O)≈1.8×10-22m2. For a patch of area A35 pixels of 35 km size, and optical depth τv the
corresponding implied mass in water vapor due to molecular absorption is Mv = 0.2×106τv A35
kg.
The plumes of Enceladus comprise a mixture of water vapor and ~micron sized ice grains (Dong
et al., 2015). The ratio by mass of grains to vapor was variable, but in the range 15−25%
typically. The ultraviolet scattering cross-sections for solid column (and other) ice particle habits
are given by Key et al. (2002). Converting their parameters into mass and optical depth, we
derive a mass in grains of Mg(H2O) = 0.64×106 τg A35 aµm kg, where τg is the optical depth due to
grains, A35 is the area of the patch in 35 km pixels, and aµm is the grain size in microns. The total
14
optical depth is the optical depth due to molecular absorption (vapor) and grains. If the mass
ratio of grains to vapor is α≈0.2, the total inferred mass in water from a patch of intrinsic optical
(1+α)/ (1+α/3.2aµm) kg, from which it is
depth τ and area A35 pixels is Mtot(H2O) = 0.2×106τ A35
evident that the presence of grains in any scattering ice plumes makes a difference only of order
10% (12.9% specifically for α=0.2). More subtly, however, is that grains scatter across the entire
spectrum, including the redder regions for which the PSF is sharper, raising the possibility that
the correction factor due to PSF blurring may be (slightly) reduced. In the discussion that
follows, given these offsetting small corrections, we set α=0.
At face value, inspecting the January 26, 2014 image, there are three patches of absorption in the
latitude zone where Roth et al. (2014a) found evidence of an emission line plume, though with
sub-longitude ≈181° rather than ≈93°, Fig. 21. We defined the potential plume region as those
points within the Roth latitude range (polar angle 220−260°), and probability of chance
occurrence p<0.01 based on the probability image for 5×5 binning, for the quantitative analysis
that follows.
Converting the statistical data to physical quantities, the average optical depth, defined as I=I0e-τ,
in the plume region as described in the previous paragraph, is <τ>≈0.15 (15% absorption)
averaged over 45 pixels (55125 km2) with a peak τmax≈0.25. For an average measured optical
depth <τ>≈0.15 the implied intrinsic optical depth is <τ>≈0.42 for a blurring correction factor of
2.8, and the average column density is <N>≈2.3×1021m-2 which is higher than the H2O column
density inferred by Roth et al. (2014a) of ≈1.5×1020m-2. Nevertheless, the total number of H2O
molecules in the two-plume model of Roth et al. (2014a) is 1.3×1032, while the implied total
number of H2O molecules (column density times projected putative plume area) of our new
observation is also 1.3×1032, or ≈3.9×106kg, in good agreement, though the uncertainty is
significant.
Hence, at face value, the absorbing features we see imply a similar order of magnitude of
material to the emission features of Roth et al. (2014a), and arise in the same latitudes, but with
physical characteristics derived in a completely independent fashion using a very different
observing strategy, albeit with the same detector.
We turn now to the compact nub of March 17, 2014, on the trailing limb. Quantitatively, the
average optical depth over the central 22 pixels is <τ>≈0.21, reaching a peak τ≈0.34 at a
significance level of 4.4 σ, with formal probability of being a random event ≈4.8×10-6. The
corresponding column density for a pure water event would be 3.3×1021m-2 corresponding to a
total of 1.8×1032 H2O molecules, or ≈5.4×106kg. The two polar region patches of absorption in
this image have an implied corresponding column density 2.7×1021m-2 corresponding to a total of
2.1×1032 H2O molecules, or ≈6.6×106kg.
Fig. 22 shows an example of an idealized model, with a Gaussian σ=2.5 pixels (≈90 km)
absorption patch, peak optical depth 0.75, with Poisson noise added, not intended to be a
rigorous fit to the data, but in quite good qualitative and quantitative agreement with the data,
also shown. In this example, the peak implied intrinsic optical depth is ≈2× the peak observed
15
optical depth and the total intrinsic absorption of the model is 2.3× the face-value extinction in
the data.
Examining the image of April 4, 2014, the average optical depth is 0.04 over 42 pixels, reaching
a peak τ≈0.3 at a significance level of 4.5 σ, with formal probability of being a random event
≈2.9×10-6. The corresponding average column density for a pure water event would be
0.7×1021m-2 corresponding to a total of 0.5×1032 H2O molecules, or ≈1.4×106kg.
Given large correction factors due to pixel blurring, red leak and the balance of ice particle to
molecular scattering, the numbers above are intended to provide only an approximate order of
magnitude to assess plausibility. Since the total amounts of implied material are of the same
order as those of Roth et al. (2014a), we conclude that it is possible water plumes could be
producing the apparent absorption features.
6.2 A PHYSICAL MODEL?
The original hypothesis being tested by Roth et al. (2014a) was that, following the example of
Enceladus, the plumes were modulated on the orbital period of Europa (3.55 days) and that
maximum activity would occur at apoapsis. The true anomaly values for the three transits
potentially indicative of activity, are intermediate between apoapsis and periapsis (see Table 1
and Fig.1). These three candidate images are grouped together covering a time period of ~2.5
months, though with a gap on March 24, 2014 (Fig. 16), hinting at a protracted period of activity.
If this were to represent a timescale of activity, the two month period is ~19 orbits of Europa
about Jupiter, many times the Europa orbital period (3.55 days); hence the initial expectation of
an activity cycle that correlates with Europa's location in its orbit, similar to Enceladus and as
proposed by Roth et al. (2014a), is not valid.
Also, despite almost contemporaneous observations during early 2014, Roth et al. (2014b) failed
to detect any plume activity. There are possible physical explanations: the plumes may be
genuinely transient if their activity is governed by tidal stresses as Europa orbits Jupiter. The
observing programs of Roth et al. (2014a; b) were designed to test this hypothesis, and they
concluded that other factors must be involved. Variations in the plasma environment cause large
variations in auroral activity, and even if plume activity is fairly constant, or slowly varying,
rapid fluctuations in the ambient plasma can result in substantially different detectability of the
plume emission sought by Roth et al. (2014a, b). The upper limits of Roth et al. (2014a, b) are
typically a factor of a few less than their detection, which in principle could be due to decreased
excitation rather than diminished plume activity. Our technique is insensitive to the plasma
environment.
The feature of March 17, 2014 is close to the crater Pwyll, but is significantly displaced to the
North, by approximately 6.5° of latitude, or 177 km. Fig. 23 plots an ellipse of dimensions
8.3°×34° centered at longitude 275.68°, latitude 16.4°S, corresponding to the approximate
uncertainty in the location of the feature from the HST image. The apparent extent of the feature
along the limb is ≈6.6 pixels and we assume an uncertainty of 2 pixels orthogonal to the limb.
Fagents (2003) summarizes a wide variety of models that could explain cryogenic volcanism on
the surface of Europa, though acknowledging that despite the geological youth of the surface,
16
there may be other explanations for the features considered. There is a great deal of complex
terrain within the ellipse shown in Fig. 23, and several features reminiscent of those discussed in
Fagents (2003) in the context of cryovolcanism. However, we consider discussion of detailed
physical processes premature until the plume activity is confirmed (or shown not to exist).
7. CONCLUSIONS
We have used HST STIS FUV imaging observations of Europa as it transits the smooth face of
Jupiter to reveal statistically significant evidence of off-limb absorption features in the vicinity of
the plumes discovered by Roth et al. (2014a). All transit observations have essentially the same
viewing perspective since the orbit of Europa is tidally locked. The features are mostly at similar
latitude to the event of Roth et al. (2014a), but approximately 90° further West in longitude.
There are hints that the features appear three times between January 2014 and April 2014. The
original hypothesis tested by Roth et al (2014a) was that plume activity would correlate with true
anomaly, as is the case for Enceladus. These times, however, do not correspond to special values
of the true anomaly, in particular orbital apocenter, and Roth et al (2014b) also came to the
conclusion, namely that being at orbital apocenter is not a sufficient condition for plume activity.
This period also, however, encompasses the null results of Roth et al. (2014b). There are
potential physical explanations, including a variable plasma environment or intermittent activity,
or this may be indicative of the presence of unknown artifacts. If the apparent absorption is due
to plume activity, quantitatively, the implied amounts of water are similar to the plumes
described by Roth et al. (2014a).
We find only upper limits for all other observations between December 2013 and March 2015.
The observation of March 17, 2014, provides an indication of a compact off-limb patch of
absorption at a more equatorial latitude ≈16.5°S, longitude ≈275°W, north of the crater Pwyll.
The peak optical depth of the patch is τ≈0.34, corresponding to a column density of ≈1.8×1021m-
2 and a mass of ≈5.4×106 kg if the feature is pure water. Since this feature is at a more equatorial
latitude, and is compact, it is possible to locate the event more precisely on the surface of
Europa. Even so, the error ellipse encompasses a wide variety of Europa terrain.
In conclusion, we find tentative evidence in three of our ten observations that could be indicative
of plume activity on Europa. The features we find are statistically significant from the
perspective of photon statistics, and we are unable to identify any definitive systematic problem
that could be responsible. If the features we see are due to plumes, then the activity must be more
common and more extensive than previously thought.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
These data were obtained using the Hubble Space Telescope which is operated by STScI/AURA
under grant NAS5-26555. We acknowledge support from grants associated with observing
programs HST GO-13438, HST GO/DD-13620 and HST GO-13829.
17
REFERENCES
Science 281, 2019
Anderson, J.D., Schubert, G., Jacobson, R.A., Lau, E.L., Moore, W.B., Sjogren, W.L., 1998,
Biretta, J., et al. 2016, "STIS Instrument Handbook", Version 15.0, (Baltimore: STScI)
Brilliantov, N.V., Schmidt, J., Spahn, F. 2008, P&SS, 56, 1596
Chyba, C.E. 2000, Nature, 403, 381
Chyba, C.F., Hand, K.P. 2001, Science, 292: 2026
Dong, Y., Hill, T.W., Ye, S.,-Y 2015, JGRA, 120, 915
Fagents, S. A., R. Greeley, R. J. Sullivan, R. T. Pappalardo, L. M. Prockter, and the Galileo SSI
Team, 2000, Icarus, 144, 54
Fagents, S.A. 2003, JGR, 108,13
Goguen, J.D., Stone, T.C., Kieffer, H.H., Buratti, B.J., 2010, Icarus, 208, 548
Hand, K.P., Carlson, R.W., Chyba, C.F., 2007, Astrobiology, 7, 1006
Hand, K.P., Chyba, C.F., Priscu, J.C., Carlson, R.W., Nealson, K.H.. Astrobiology and the potential for
life on Europa (2009), Chapter in Europa, Eds. R. Pappalardo, W. McKinnon, and K. Khurana,
University of Arizona Press Space Science Series, pp 589-630.
Hall, D.T., Strobel, D.F., Feldman, P.D., McGrath, M.A., Weaver, H.A., 1995, Nature, 373, 677
Kargel, J.S., Kaye, J.Z., Head, J.W., et al., 2000, Icarus, 148, 226
Key, J., Yang, P., Baum, B., Nasiri, S. 2002, JGR, 107(D13), 4181
Kivelson, M.G., Khurana, K.K., Russell, C.T., Volwerk, M., Walker, R.J., Zimmer, C.,
Science, 289, 1340
2000,
Krist, J.E., Burrows, C.J., 1995, Applied Optics, 34, 4951
Krist, J.E., Hook, R.N., Stoehr, F., 2011, Proc. SPIE 8127, Optical Modeling and Performance
Predictions V, 81270J (22 September 2011); doi:10.1117/12.892762
McGrath, M. A., Hansen, C. J., and Hendrix, A. R. Europa's Tenuous Atmosphere (2009),
Chapter in Europa, Eds. R. Pappalardo, W. McKinnon, and K. Khurana, University of
Arizona Press Space Science Series, pp 485-505.
Oren, M., Nayar, S.K. 1994, Generalization of Lambert's Reflectance Model. SIGGRAPH.
pp.239-246, Jul, 1994.
18
Pappalardo, R.T., Head, J.W.I., Greeley, R., Sullivan, R., Pilcher, C.B., Schubert, G., Moore,
W.B., Carr, M.H., Moore, J.M., Belton, M.J.S., Goldsby, D.L., 1998, Nature 391, 365
Porco, C.C., Helfenstein, P., Thomas, P.C., et al., 2006, Science, 311, 1393Roth, L., Saur, J.,
Retherford, K.D., Strobel, D.F., Feldman, P., McGrath, M.A., Nimmo, F., 2014a,
Science, 343, 171
Roth, L., Saur, J., Retherford, K.D., Strobel, D.F., Feldman, P., McGrath, M.A., Nimmo, F.,
2014(a), Science, 343, 171-174.
Roth, L., Retherford, K.D., Saur, J., Strobel, D.F., Feldman, P., McGrath, M.A., Nimmo, F.,
2014(b), PNAS, 111, E5123
Roth, L., Saur, J., Retherford, K. et al., 2015, JGR, in press, doi: 10.1002/2015JA022073
Tian, F., Stewart, A.I.F., Toon, O.B., Larsen, K.W., Esposito, L.W., 2007, Icarus, 188, 154
Torrance, K. E. and Sparrow, E. M. 1967, J. Opt. Soc. Am.. 57, 9, 1105
Waite, J.H., Combi, M.R., Ip, W.-H. et al., 2006, Science, 311, 1419
Zimmer, C., Khurana, K., Kivelson, M.G., 2000, Icarus 147, 329
19
km per
pixel
(detector)
37.7
38.1
41.1
43.5
44.5
46.0
47.5
48.5
49.9
40.8
39.9
39.7
39.6
39.2
38.8
39.5
39.8
True
Anomaly
238.91
260.08
296.56
296.83
295.03
310.31
316.94
323.85
328.72
354.47
194.46
100.43
208.49
185.64
306.55
227.08
66.44
TABLES:
TABLE 1: Summary of STIS observations
Dataset
Visit Start Time
Exposure time
(seconds)
Observation
sub
longitude
Europa
Diameter
(arcsec)
OC7U03SCQ*
OC7U02G2Q*
OCHZ09QRQ
OCHZ03DWQ*
OCHZ04EAQ*
OCHZ05FTQ*
OCHZ06EVQ*
OCHZ08FYQ*
OCHZ07P2Q*
OCP206JFQ
OCP207JWQ*
OCP202X3Q
OCP204D7Q
OCP203M8Q
OCP205N1Q
OCP208PBQ*
OCP251YTQ
12/22/13 6:58
1/26/14 18:05
2/27/14 19:57
3/17/14 11:47
3/24/14 12:45
4/4/14 5:20
4/14/14 21:52
4/22/14 0:19
5/2/14 15:15
12/28/14 14:26
1/6/15 14:54
1/9/15 4:58
1/10/15 6:26
1/17/15 2:23
2/15/15 11:28
3/4/15 7:45
3/6/15 5:54
1473.88
2023.24
2507.19
2389.45
2232.8
2200.41
2119.05
1802.89
2507.2
2508.19
1741.85
2508.19
2508.2
2508.2
2508.2
1489.27
2508.17
182.12
181.75
195.65
185.68
178.98
181.9
184.3
183.33
178.55
348.86
184.01
86.37
194.12
167.36
269.45
178.99
14.09
1.018
1.006
0.9317
0.8816
0.8619
0.8332
0.8065
0.7902
0.7679
0.9398
0.9607
0.9645
0.9674
0.9781
0.9884
0.9691
0.9638
20
TABLE 2: Statistical summary of image quality
Counts Sky
(counts)
13.68
19.11
16.23
13.12
12.43
13.54
12.47
9.8
13.85
15.04
0.13
0.21
0.6
0.81
0.52
0.48
0.59
0.52
0.23
0.08
σ(d/m5) σ(d/m7) <z5>
σ(z5)
<z7>
σ(z7)
n5
n7
0.054
0.046
0.05
0.057
0.059
0.057
0.059
0.068
0.054
0.053
0.056
0.039
0.033
0.035
0.042
0.042
0.04
0.042
0.049
0.039
0.038
0.040
0.009
-0.008
0.063
0.072
0.052
-0.004
0.030
0.055
0.071
0.052
0.039
1.001
1.015
0.983
1.011
1.026
1.027
1.015
1.040
1.017
1.047
1.018
0.048
-0.005
0.084
0.074
0.046
0.070
0.038
0.083
0.130
0.059
0.063
0.995
1.025
0.988
1.030
1.029
1.013
1.016
1.051
1.038
1.040
1.023
0
0
0
1
3
0
0
1
0
3
0.8
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
1
0
5
1
Dataset
oc7u03scq
oc7u02g2q
ochz03dwq
ochz04eaq
ochz05ftq
ochz06evq
ochz08fyq
ochz07p2q
ocp207jwq
ocp208pbq
Mean
Columns:
bin 5×5
bin 7×7
1. Dataset
2. Mean counts outside 1.5 RE in 35 km frame
3. Sky level in 35 km image
4. Standard deviation of data/model in sampling grid, yielding 1-σ limit for optical depth,
5. Standard deviation of data/model in sampling grid, yielding 1-σ limit for optical depth,
6. Mean normalized data/model (i.e. "z") in sampling grid, bin 5×5
7. Standard deviation of normalized data/model in sampling grid, bin 5×5
8. Mean normalized data/model (i.e. "z") in sampling grid, bin 7×7
9. Standard deviation of normalized data/model in sampling grid, bin 7×7
10. Number of negative outliers, 5×5 binning
11. Number of negative outliers, 7×7 binning
21
FIGURE CAPTIONS
Figure 1. Left, true anomaly distribution for HST STIS observations. Transits are in blue and out
of transit, red. The transits with evidence of plume activity are circled. Right, the configuration
of Europa as seen by the observer.
Fig. 2. Left, central 2.5×2.5 arcsec of the composite TinyTim model PSF used, and for
comparison, empirical PSFs (images of stars) at different focus values illustrating the difficulty
of exactly matching the model PSF to the data.
Fig. 3. Procedure used to construct model observations. An optical map of Europa was combined
with a generalized Lambertian illumination function and background reconstruction of Jupiter,
convolved with the PSF, central 2.5 arcsec shown, and Poisson noise added.
Fig. 4. Lower array shows all images of Europa in geometrically corrected detector coordinate
system, ranked in time starting lower left, moving left to right. Upper panel shows derived
models for each observation, without Poisson noise.
Figures 5-14: The following 10 figures show data/model on the left hand side, scaled 0.8-1.2
corresponding to 20% absorption as black, and on the right, the probability of chance occurrence,
given by (-log10p) scaled 0−5.5 with high numbers representing low probability of chance
occurrence.
Fig. 5. oc7u03scq
Fig. 6. oc7u02g2q
Fig. 7. ochz03dwq
Fig. 8. ochz04eaq
Fig. 9. ochz05ftq
Fig. 10. ochz06evq
Fig. 11. ochz08fyq
Fig. 12. ochz07p2q
Fig. 13. ocp207jwq
Fig. 14. ocp208pbq
Fig. 15. Probability images for Europa transits on (a) January 26, (b) March 17, (c) April 4,
2014, showing statistically significant off-limb features, based purely on photon statistics
without regard for possible systematic effects. Beneath, (d), (e), (f), the corresponding "optical
depth" images scaled 0.0−0.15 black to white. Inset to lower right shows the PSF to the same
scale with the same bin factor as the images. Images: oc7u02g2q, ochz03dwq, ochz05ftq.
Fig. 16. Timeline for Europa transit observations, showing significant residuals between January
and April 2014. Images are (-log) probability images, as for Figs. 5 to 14, scaled 0−5.5.
Fig. 17. Image oc7u02g2q obtained January 26, 2014 shown in two coordinate frames: 35
km/pixel (left) and detector frame (right). The features of interest are indicated with the ellipse.
22
Fig. 18. Image of oc7u02g2q after division by a circularly symmetric profile, left, with
associated probability map on the right, showing the same features as seen in the data/model
image.
Fig. 19, showing dark patch close to limb in image ochz03dwq. Top left, the data image after
dividing by a model of Jupiter; lower left data after division by circularly symmetric profile. Top
right, data divided by model, and bottom right, data divided by median of the other 9 transits.
Dashed green circle shows Europa limb, and blue circle centered on dark spot.
Fig. 20. Histogram of normalized deviations "z values" for ochz03dwq, divided by the median of
the other 9 transit images processed as described in the text. The location of the minimum z of
the compact protrusion discussed in the text is indicated with the blue arrow. A Gaussian with
zero mean and unit standard deviation is overplotted.
Fig. 21. Showing the location of features in the January 26, 2014 image relative to the location of
the Roth et al. (2014) plume detection. The cyan circle shows the new location and the yellow,
the Roth one. On the right, the Roth et al. (2014) annulus and sector containing the putative
plumes, which also contains the current features.
Fig. 22. Illustration of a model patch of absorption, convolved with a TinyTim PSF and Possion
noise added, configured to approximately match the data of March 17, 2014. The model is to the
left and the data, to the right.
Fig. 23. High resolution image from Galileo showing approximate location uncertainty of the
equatorial off-limb feature discussed in the text. The viewing perspective of the STIS data is
from the right.
23
Figures(
(Figure(1(
(((((((
(Figure(2(
(Figure(3(
((
(
(
Figure(4(
(((((
((Figures(5,(6(and(7(
(((
(
Figures(8,(9(and(10(
((
Figures(11,(12(13(and(14(
((Figure(15(
(
(Figure(16(
(Figure(17(
((((((
(Figure(18(
(((((
(FIgure(19((
((
(Figure(20(
Figure(21(
((((((
(Figure(22(
(
((((
FIgure(23(
((
|
1301.6284 | 1 | 1301 | 2013-01-26T20:19:05 | Near-Infrared Spectral Monitoring of Pluto's Ices: Spatial Distribution and Secular Evolution | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | We report results from monitoring Pluto's 0.8 to 2.4 {\mu}m reflectance spectrum with IRTF/SpeX on 65 nights over the dozen years from 2001 to 2012. The spectra show vibrational absorption features of simple molecules CH4, CO, and N2 condensed as ices on Pluto's surface. These absorptions are modulated by the planet's 6.39 day rotation period, enabling us to constrain the longitudinal distributions of the three ices. Absorptions of CO and N2 are concentrated on Pluto's anti-Charon hemisphere, unlike absorptions of less volatile CH4 ice that are offset by roughly 90{\deg} from the longitude of maximum CO and N2 absorption. In addition to the diurnal variations, the spectra show longer term trends. On decadal timescales, Pluto's stronger CH4 absorption bands have been getting deeper, while the amplitude of their diurnal variation is diminishing, consistent with additional CH4 absorption at high northern latitudes rotating into view as the sub-Earth latitude moves north (as defined by the system's angular momentum vector). Unlike the CH4 absorptions, Pluto's CO and N2 absorptions appear to be declining over time, suggesting more equatorial or southerly distributions of those species. Comparisons of geometrically-matched pairs of observations favor geometric explanations for the observed secular changes in CO and N2 absorption, although seasonal volatile transport could be at least partly responsible. The case for a volatile transport contribution to the secular evolution looks strongest for CH4 ice, despite it being the least volatile of the three ices. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | Near-Infrared Spectral Monitoring of Pluto's Ices:
Spatial Distribution and Secular Evolution
In press in Icarus
W.M. Grundy1,2, C.B. Olkin2,3, L.A. Young2,3,
M.W. Buie2,3, and E.F. Young2,3.
1. Lowell Observatory, 1400 W. Mars Hill Rd., Flagstaff AZ 86001.
2. Visiting or remote observer at the Infrared Telescope Facility, which is operated by the University of
Hawaii under Cooperative Agreement no. NNX-08AE38A with the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration, Science Mission Directorate, Planetary Astronomy Program.
3. Southwest Research Institute, 1050 Walnut St. #300, Boulder CO 80302.
— submitted 2012-12-02, accepted 2013-01-22 —
ABSTRACT
We report results from monitoring Pluto's 0.8 to 2.4 µm reflectance spectrum with
IRTF/SpeX on 65 nights over the dozen years from 2001 to 2012. The spectra show vibrational
absorption features of simple molecules CH4, CO, and N2 condensed as ices on Pluto's surface.
These absorptions are modulated by the planet's 6.39 day rotation period, enabling us to constrain
the longitudinal distributions of the three ices. Absorptions of CO and N2 are concentrated on
Pluto's anti-Charon hemisphere, unlike absorptions of less volatile CH4 ice that are offset by
roughly 90° from the longitude of maximum CO and N2 absorption. In addition to the diurnal
variations, the spectra show longer term trends. On decadal timescales, Pluto's stronger CH4 ab-
sorption bands have been getting deeper, while the amplitude of their diurnal variation is dimin-
ishing, consistent with additional CH4 absorption at high northern latitudes rotating into view as
the sub-Earth latitude moves north (as defined by the system's angular momentum vector). Un-
like the CH4 absorptions, Pluto's CO and N2 absorptions appear to be declining over time, sug-
gesting more equatorial or southerly distributions of those species. Comparisons of geometri-
cally-matched pairs of observations favor geometric explanations for the observed secular
changes in CO and N2 absorption, although seasonal volatile transport could be at least partly re-
sponsible. The case for a volatile transport contribution to the secular evolution looks strongest
for CH4 ice, despite it being the least volatile of the three ices.
1
1. Introduction
Reflectance spectroscopy has had a remarkable record of revealing the surface composi-
tions of icy solar system bodies, ranging from satellites of the four giant planets to icy dwarf
planets beyond Neptune's orbit (see reviews by Cruikshank et al. 1998a,b; Clark et al. 2013; and
de Bergh et al. 2013; and references therein). In addition to nearly ubiquitous water ice, more ex-
otic ices of methane, ethane, nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen cyanide, ammonia, carbon monoxide,
carbon dioxide, and sulfur dioxide have been identified on outer solar system bodies from their
characteristic patterns of absorption bands imprinted on visible to infrared reflectance spectra.
Several of these ices are highly volatile (e.g., Brown and Zeigler 1980; Fray and Schmitt 2009)
and could be mobilized on seasonal timescales, even at the cryogenic temperatures prevalent in
the outer solar system (Hansen and Paige 1996; Spencer et al. 1997; Trafton et al. 1998; Young
2012a). In addition to discovering the existence of such ices, spectroscopy can be a powerful
tool for monitoring their evolution over time. This prospect is especially enticing for Pluto's sur-
face, where volatile N2, CH4, and CO ices are all known to exist (Owen et al. 1993; Douté et al.
1999). Having passed through both perihelion and equinox within the past few decades, Pluto's
surface and atmosphere are thought to be undergoing seasonal evolution at an especially rapid
pace, at least compared with aphelion. Stellar occultations indicate that the atmospheric pressure
has been increasing (Elliot et al. 2003; Sicardy et al. 2003; Young 2012b and references therein)
and photometric lightcurves and Hubble Space Telescope imagery show that Pluto's surface
albedo patterns are not static (Buratti et al. 2003; Schaefer et al. 2008; Buie et al. 2010a,b).
NASA's New Horizons spacecraft will return a detailed, up-close look at the system in 2015
(e.g., Young et al. 2008). Understanding how that brief snapshot fits into the broader, seasonal
context is crucial for getting the most scientific understanding out of the New Horizons flyby.
Various teams have been spectroscopically monitoring the Pluto system at near-infrared
wavelengths to help constrain the spatial distribution and long term evolution of its surface ices
(e.g., Rudy et al. 2003; Verbiscer et al. 2007; Merlin et al. 2010). From 1995 to 1998, we col-
lected Pluto spectra on 83 nights at Lowell Observatory's 72" Perkins telescope (Grundy and
Buie 2001). Over the past dozen years, our spectroscopic monitoring campaign has continued at
NASA's InfraRed Telescope Facility (IRTF). This paper presents the ensemble of the IRTF data
and discusses some patterns seen in the data. Companion papers will go into greater detail with
radiative transfer models fitted to the Pluto spectra.
2. Data Acquisition and Reduction
Spectra were recorded during a series of observing runs from 2001 through 2012 at
NASA's 3 m IRTF, located at an altitude of 4168 m on the summit of Mauna Kea. Most observ-
ing was done remotely by observers situated on the mainland as described by Bus et al. (2002),
during scheduled telescope time allocations of typically two to four hours duration, although
longer allocations were occasionally requested in order to obtain higher quality data. We used
the short cross-dispersed mode of the SpeX spectrograph (Rayner et al. 1998, 2003). This mode
divides the 0.8 to 2.4 µm wavelength range across five spectral orders, recorded on a
1024 × 1024 InSb detector array. Usable data were obtained on 65 nights, with circumstances
described in Table 1. A few of the resulting spectra have been shown previously (Olkin et al.
2007; Protopapa et al. 2008; Tegler et al. 2012; plus several conference presentations), but this
paper presents most of them for the first time, along with a full description of data acquisition
and reduction procedures.
2
UT date of
Sky conditionsa
observation
mean-time
(on site or remote)
2001/07/04 8h.98 Cirrus (HI)
2001/07/07 9h.20 Cirrus (HI)
2001/07/08 8h.30 Clear (HI)
2002/06/24 6h.54 Mostly clear (HI)
2002/06/25 6h.30 Cirrus (HI)
2002/06/26 6h.49 Clear (HI)
2002/07/15 7h.24 Clear (HI)
2002/07/16 7h.29 Some clouds (HI)
2002/07/17 6h.94 Partly cloudy (HI)
2002/07/18 6h.81 Thin cirrus (HI)
2002/07/19 7h.06 Thin cirrus (HI)
2002/07/20 6h.80 Thin cirrus (HI)
2002/07/21 6h.81 Thin cirrus (HI)
2002/07/22 6h.72 Clear (HI)
2003/08/09 6h.82 Clear (r)
2005/04/15 13h.15 Thin cirrus (r)
2005/05/09 13h.06 Mostly clear (r)
2005/05/23 11h.27 Heavy cirrus (r)
2005/05/24 12h.03 Clear (r)
2006/07/19 8h.32 Clear (r)
2006/07/24 7h.83 Heavy cirrus (r)
2006/07/25 7h.73 Clear (r)
2006/07/26 7h.71 Clear (r)
2006/08/08 7h.13 Thin cirrus (r)
2006/08/25 6h.80 Clear (r)
2007/06/23 10h.78 Clear (r)
2007/06/25 10h.66 Clear (r)
2007/08/06 7h.27 Clear (r)
2007/08/07 7h.50 Clear (r)
2007/08/08 7h.06 Clear (r)
2007/08/09 6h.90 Clear (r)
2007/08/10 7h.07 A little cirrus (r)
2007/08/11 7h.65 Clear (r)
Table 1
Observational circumstances
Sub-Earth
Slit H band
longitudeb
width
seeing
latitudeb
(″︢)
(″︢)
(°N)
(°E)
27.7
196.5
1.1
0.5
0.5
1.0
26.9
27.6
27.6
332.7
1.1
0.5
30.0
352.0
1.1
0.5
0.5
0.6
296.2
29.9
29.9
239.3
0.6
0.3
29.5
246.8
0.6
0.3
0.3
0.7
190.4
29.5
29.4
134.8
0.8
0.3
29.4
78.8
0.8
0.3
0.3
0.7
21.8
29.4
29.4
326.1
0.8
0.3
29.4
269.7
0.6
0.3
0.3
0.7
213.6
29.4
31.1
225.0
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.5
103.0
37.1
36.8
190.7
0.7
0.3
36.5
125.9
0.7
0.3
0.3
0.7
67.8
36.5
37.0
106.7
0.8
0.3
37.0
186.1
1.5
0.3
0.3
1.0
130.0
36.9
36.9
73.7
0.9
0.3
36.7
62.4
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.7
185.1
36.5
39.5
72.0
0.6
0.3
39.4
319.5
0.5
0.3
0.5
0.7
120.7
38.5
38.5
63.8
0.6
0.5
38.5
8.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.6
312.5
38.5
38.5
255.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.7
198.0
38.5
Phase
angle
(°)
0.99
1.06
1.09
0.64
0.66
0.69
1.19
1.21
1.23
1.26
1.28
1.30
1.33
1.35
1.63
1.59
1.10
0.73
0.70
1.01
1.14
1.16
1.19
1.47
1.72
0.26
0.30
1.36
1.39
1.41
1.42
1.44
1.46
Pluto
integration
(min)
120
147
192
44
46
48
60
80
96
88
78
92
96
104
96
176
188
184
268
148
100
160
168
126
136
32
36
104
80
108
112
116
124
3
2008/06/16 10h.99 A little cirrus (r)
2008/06/17 10h.94 Clear (r)
2008/06/18 11h.10 Cirrus (r)
2008/06/19 10h.63 Cirrus (r)
2008/06/20 10h.67 Clear (r)
2008/06/21 10h.68 Clear (r)
2009/06/18 12h.52 Clear (r)
2009/06/19 12h.14 Clear, humid (r)
2009/06/20 12h.84 Clear, humid (r)
2009/06/21 12h.40 Clear (r)
2009/06/22 12h.62 Clear (r)
2010/05/08 14h.11 Clear (r)
2010/05/28 14h.01 Some clouds (r)
2010/06/24 10h.52 Clear (r)
2010/06/25 10h.25 Clear (r)
2010/06/30 10h.22 Fog (r)
2010/07/01 9h.99 Clear (r)
2011/05/22 14h.77 Clear (r)
2011/06/01 13h.96 Clear (r)
2011/06/02 13h.89 Trace of clouds (r)
2011/06/06 14h.43 Clear (r)
2011/06/07 13h.91 Clear (r)
2011/06/11 13h.82 Clear (r)
2011/06/12 11h.90 Partly cloudy (r)
2011/07/15 9h.02 Clear (r)
2012/05/12 13h.51 Clear (r)
2012/05/13 13h.83 Clear (r)
2012/05/14 13h.92 Trace of cirrus (r)
2012/05/15 14h.04 Clear (r)
2012/05/16 14h.03 Clear (r)
2012/05/17 13h.97 Clear (r)
2012/09/09 6h.19 Clear (r)
Table notes:
a. On-site observing runs are indicated by “(HI)” and remote observing runs are indicated by “(r)”.
b. Throughout this paper, geometry on Pluto is defined as in previous publications of this author, using a
right-hand-rule coordinate system in which North is the direction of Pluto's spin vector and East is the
direction of sunrise. Zero longitude is defined by the sub-Charon point. Longitudes and latitudes tabu-
lated here were computed by assuming Pluto's spin state is tidally locked to the Buie et al. (2012) orbit
of Charon.
355.4
299.1
242.4
187.2
130.7
74.3
184.8
129.3
71.3
16.0
319.1
277.1
230.2
157.0
101.3
179.6
123.8
152.1
310.5
254.3
27.6
332.5
107.3
55.5
2.8
247.7
190.6
134.0
77.3
21.0
324.8
342.9
52
64
34
84
60
60
64
80
84
58
88
80
64
92
124
96
112
52
72
76
64
40
52
64
64
104
120
92
120
96
104
40
41.4
41.4
41.3
41.3
41.3
41.3
43.0
43.0
43.0
43.0
42.9
45.5
45.1
44.5
44.5
44.4
44.4
46.8
46.6
46.6
46.5
46.5
46.4
46.4
45.6
48.4
48.4
48.4
48.4
48.4
48.4
46.3
0.25
0.23
0.22
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.24
0.22
0.20
0.19
0.19
1.34
0.86
0.17
0.16
0.22
0.24
1.07
0.81
0.78
0.67
0.64
0.53
0.50
0.54
1.32
1.30
1.28
1.25
1.23
1.21
1.68
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.8
1.1
0.9
1.1
0.7
0.6
1.1
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.9
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.7
4
On each night, sets of Pluto observations lasting from 30 minutes up to an hour were sand-
wiched between sets of nearby solar analog star observations. Each set of observations, star or
Pluto, consisted of at least 3 spectra taken in an “A” beam position and at least 3 more taken in a
separate “B” beam position, interleaved according to an ABBAAB... pattern. Star integration
times were set to a minimum of 30 seconds to ensure that the spatial profile in each star integra-
tion was averaged over numerous telescope guiding updates, in order to be as similar as possible
to the longer 2 minute Pluto integrations, while still leaving the majority of available time for
Pluto integrations. In cases where the star was too bright to integrate for 30 seconds without sat-
urating, multiple, consecutive, shorter integrations were combined through co-addition to synthe-
size 30 second integrations. A and B spectral images were subtracted pairwise to remove most
telluric sky emission features. Spectral extraction of the A and B components from each such
subtracted pair was accomplished using the Horne (1986) optimal extraction algorithm. Details
of our implementation have been described previously and, for the sake of brevity, interested
readers are referred to Grundy et al. (2010) and references therein. However, it is worth mention-
ing here that the spatial profiles used to extract Pluto spectra were constructed from the bracket-
ing star observations, rather than from the Pluto frames themselves.
Pluto's motion along its heliocentric orbit required a new nearby solar analog star to be se-
lected every few years. Stars used for this purpose (and the years they were used) were
SAO 160066 (2001), HD 153631 (2003), HD 160788 (2005-2009), and HD 170379 (2010-
2012). Spectra of these stars were compared with additional observations of established solar
analogs 16 Cyg B, BS 5968, BS 6060, SA 112-1333, Hyades 64, and SA 105-56. The nearby so-
lar analogs were found to be spectrally consistent with these better known analogs, with the ex-
ception of HD 170379, which was found to have an effective temperature of ~6500 K, somewhat
hotter than the Sun. To account for the temperature difference, a correction based on the ratio of
two Planck functions was applied to observations using that star. Pluto spectra were divided by
spectra of bracketing nearby solar analogs to remove most instrumental and telluric effects. Dur-
ing 2002 we tried a different procedure of observing an ensemble of well known solar analogs
over a broad range of airmasses to construct an extinction model for the night. After correcting
all Pluto and star spectra to a common airmass, the Pluto average was divided by the star aver-
age. This procedure was hampered by wavelength shifts from instrument flexure, leading us to
rely on a nearby solar analog in all subsequent years. Because the observed Pluto flux is entirely
due to reflected sunlight over this wavelength range, the Pluto/solar analog ratio produced spectra
proportional to the reflectance of Pluto. It is not possible to quote absolute albedos from our nar-
row-slit spectra, since variable slit losses (e.g., due to changes in guiding, seeing, or focus) un-
dermine the photometric fidelity of comparisons between targets and standards. Residual telluric
features remain near 1.4 and 1.9 µm, where strong and narrow H2O vapor absorptions make sky
transparency especially variable in time. Example spectra from some representative nights are
plotted in Fig. 1, showing how data quality varies from relatively short total integration times,
such as the 2007 June 23 spectrum, to much longer total integrations with multiple interleaved
Pluto and star observations as on 2005 May 24.
We selected one of two different slit widths for use during a night's observations. An 0.5ʺ ︢
slit provided a reasonable match to near-infrared seeing at Mauna Kea, resulting in a typical
spectral resolving power of R = 1200 (wavelength divided by measured full width at half maxi-
mum for an unresolved line). A narrower 0.3ʺ ︢ slit boosted the resolution to around R = 1900, at a
cost of increased slit losses. SpeX's internal integrating sphere, illuminated by a low-pressure ar-
gon arc lamp, was observed at similar sky positions as Pluto so as to duplicate instrument flexure
conditions experienced during the Pluto observations. A quadratic wavelength calibration curve
was derived for each spectral order from the ensemble of arc lamp spectra obtained over the
course of the Pluto observations. For additional protection against flexure effects, the derived
5
wavelengths of telluric sky emis-
sion lines extracted from the
Pluto frames themselves were
checked against their published
wavelengths (Rousselot et al.
2000; Hanuschik 2003). Occa-
sionally, this check called for a
shift in the constant term of the
wavelength calibration relative to
what was measured for the argon
spectra. Spectral profiles of both
arc lamp and sky emission lines
were well approximated by
Gaussians having full width at
half maximum (FWHM) of ~2
pixels for the 0.3″︢ slit and ~3
pixels for the 0.5″︢ slit. Wave-
length uncertainty, primarily due
to flexure and to a few sparse re-
gions in the argon spectrum, is
generally less than a pixel. Flex-
ural shifts over the course of a
night's observations degraded the
spectral resolution of final
nightly average spectra, espe-
cially for nights with longer total
integration times. On such
nights, measured resolutions of
R ≈ 1600 and 1100 were more
typical for the 0.3″︢ and 0.5″︢ slits,
respectively.
As seen from Earth, Pluto and its largest satellite Charon are never separated by more than
about 1″︢ on the sky, so light from both objects can enter the spectrograph slit and be blended in
our spectra. Unfortunately, the amount of light received from Charon is highly variable, depend-
ing on the separation between the two objects, seeing conditions, slit width, and the orientation of
the slit relative to the Pluto-Charon position angle. At higher airmasses we would try to orient
the 15″︢ long slit near the parallactic angle to minimize effects of differential refraction by the
Earth's atmosphere, while at lower airmasses we would try to place it along the Pluto-Charon
line. However, over the past decade Pluto has been passing through a highly crowded region
near the galactic center, so the need to keep background sources out of the slit often left us with
little choice of slit orientation. Our use of point-source spatial profiles based on the star observa-
tions helped reduce the Charon contribution on nights of better seeing, but on poor seeing nights,
signal from the two bodies was highly blended. Charon accounts for about a fifth of the total sur-
face area in the Pluto system so it could contribute up to a fifth of the observed signal, if its
albedo was the same as Pluto's. Charon's albedo is actually lower than Pluto's at most wave-
lengths between 0.8 and 2.4 µm (Fink and DiSanti 1988; Douté et al. 1999; Buie & Grundy
2000; Grundy and Buie 2002), diminishing its potential contribution to our spectra. But in nar-
row spectral regions centered about 1.72 and 1.79 µm, and also in the range from around 2.18 to
2.4 µm, strong CH4 ice absorptions reduce Pluto's albedo to below that of Charon, so these spec-
Figure 1. Example spectra obtained on UT dates indicated in
YYMMDD format with vertical offsets indicated in parentheses .
Noisy areas or gaps around 1.0, 1.4, and 1.9 µm coincide with
higher opacity in the terrestrial atmosphere.
6
tral regions are likeliest to show effects of variable Charon contamination. Spectral contributions
from Nix, Hydra, and the other small satellites are negligible, both because they are further away
from Pluto and because they are
much fainter (e.g., Weaver et al.
2006; Showalter et al. 2011,
2012).
Pluto's disk as seen from
Earth is an unresolved 0.1″︢
across, so each of our observa-
tions represents the reflectance
integrated over whichever hemi-
sphere of Pluto is oriented to-
ward Earth at the time of the ob-
servation. The region near the
center of the disk contributes
most strongly to the observed
signal, with foreshortened re-
gions approaching the limb con-
tributing less. The sub-Earth
longitudes and latitudes of our
65 observations are shown in
Fig. 2. The full data set provides
relatively dense sampling as a
function of sub-Earth longitude,
making it particularly well-
suited to investigating the longi-
tudinal distributions of Pluto's
volatile CO, CH4, and N2 ices, as
discussed in the next section.
3. Longitudinal Distributions of Ices
3.1 Carbon Monoxide Ice
Two narrow CO ice absorption bands are visible in our spectra. Both are overtones of a
fundamental vibrational transition at 4.67 µm (Quirico and Schmitt 1997a). Despite its being the
stronger of the two, the 2-0 overtone at 2.35 µm is difficult to quantify in our spectra because it
falls between two very strong and overlapping CH4 ice absorptions. The 3-0 overtone at 1.58 µm
occupies a much less cluttered spectral region. A simple measure of an absorption band's
strength is its equivalent width. This was computed for the 3-0 CO band in each of our spectra
by integrating one minus the ratio of spectrum/continuum over wavelengths between 1.575 and
1.581 µm, with wavelengths from 1.571 to 1.575 µm and from 1.581 to 1.585 µm being used to
constrain a linear continuum model. Based on near-infrared spectral observations of this same
band obtained during 1995 to 1998, Grundy and Buie (2001) reported that CO ice absorption on
Pluto's anti-Charon hemisphere was much stronger than on the sub-Charon face. The new data
independently confirm that result, as shown in Fig. 3. Comparing with the map in Fig. 2, a high-
albedo region centered around 180° E, 10° N could plausibly be the site of the excess CO ice ab-
sorption. CO ice absorption appears greatly reduced on Pluto's Charon-facing hemisphere, but it
is definitely not zero there. Averaging the thirteen observations obtained within 40° of zero lon-
Figure 2. Distribution of sub-Earth longitudes and latitudes on
Pluto at the times of our IRTF observations, superimposed on a
map of single scattering albedos at visible wavelengths from Buie
et al. (2010b), based on Hubble Space Telescope observations ob-
tained between 2002 June and 2003 June . The sub-Charon point
is at 0° E, 0° N and the anti-Charon point is at 180° E, 0° N. The
hatched region was not illuminated by the Sun at the time of the
Buie et al. observations and thus was not mapped. Pluto's visible
lightcurve from the same HST observations (Buie et al. 2010a) is
shown as a dashed curve, arbitrarily scaled, with the main features
labeled. Circled pairs of observations are discussed in Section 4.
7
gitude gives a securely non-zero equivalent width of 0.076 ± 0.006 nm.
Figure 3. Equivalent width of the 1.58 µm 3-0 CO ice absorption
band, showing a roughly three-fold variation as Pluto rotates, with
maximum absorption being centered on the anti-Charon hemi -
sphere. Each point represents data from one night's observations,
with the horizontal error bar indicating the duration of the obser -
vations and the vertical error bar indicating the 1-σ uncertainty in
the equivalent width of the 1.58 µm CO ice band. Points are du-
plicated outside the 0° to 360° longitude range to better show the
cyclical pattern. The dotted curve is a sinusoid fitted to the data,
with a constant offset, amplitude, and phase of maximum absorp-
tion as free parameters . The fitted values are 0.13 nm, 0.066 nm,
and 174°, respectively.
3.2 Methane Ice
The four fundamental vibrational modes of the CH4 molecule produce a complex array of
overtone and combination absorption bands distributed across Pluto's near-infrared spectrum. In-
deed, Pluto has so many overlapping CH4 absorption bands that computing equivalent widths for
individual bands is not feasible. So instead we computed fractional depths by subtracting from
unity the ratio of the spectral signal at the center of a CH4 band to the associated continuum sig-
nal. Where continuum wavelengths were available on both sides of a band, a linear continuum
model was computed from the two, and evaluated at the wavelength of the band canter. Other-
wise a simple ratio was computed. The spectral signals in band centers were obtained by averag-
ing over a small wavelength interval to overcome noise and effects of variable spectral resolu-
tion. Examples of this fractional band depth are shown for four bands in Fig. 4, and wavelengths
used in computing them (for these and eight other CH4 bands) are listed in Table 2. Sinusoids
fitted to the fractional band depths show trends that are generally similar from one band to the
next, with maximum absorption in the 260° to 320° E longitudes range, and minimum absorption
in the 80° to 140° E range.
8
Table 2
CH4 ice absorption bands, wavelength windows, and sinusoidal fits to fractional band depths
Sinusoidal fit
Wavelength windows (µm)
1st continuum
Band
2nd continuum
Ampl.
Lon. (°E)
315
0.039
0.920 - 0.932
0.8878 - 0.8902
0.845 - 0.857
319
0.029
1.050 - 1.070
0.9710 - 0.9750
0.930 - 0.950
0.930 - 0.950
0.9895 - 0.9925
1.050 - 1.070
0.035
322
292
0.032
1.245 - 1.265
1.1350 - 1.1390
1.060 - 1.080
279
0.032
1.245 - 1.265
1.1605 - 1.1645
1.060 - 1.080
1.060 - 1.080
1.1880 - 1.1910
1.245 - 1.265
0.028
301
262
0.032
1.510 - 1.540
1.3305 - 1.3345
1.250 - 1.280
257
0.036
1.980 - 2.010
1.6635 - 1.6675
1.510 - 1.540
1.510 - 1.540
1.7185 - 1.7225
1.980 - 2.010
0.035
262
257
0.043
1.980 - 2.010
1.7910 – 1.7940
1.510 - 1.540
256
0.038
n/a
2.2005 - 2.2055
1.980 – 2.010
1.980 – 2.010
2.3130 - 2.3230
n/a
0.033
260
0.89 µm (2ν1 + ν3 + 2ν4)
0.97 µm (2ν3 + ν4)
0.99 µm (ν1 + 2ν3 + ν4)
1.14 µm (ν2 + 2ν3 + ν4)
1.16 µm (2ν1 + ν2 + ν4)
1.19 µm (ν1 + ν3 + 2ν4)
1.33 µm (ν2 + 2ν3)
1.66 µm (2ν2 + ν3)
1.72 µm (ν2 + ν3 + ν4)
1.79 µm (ν3 + 2ν4)
2.20 µm (ν2 + ν3)
2.32 µm (ν3 + ν4)
Absorption band
Const.
0.20
0.11
0.16
0.39
0.49
0.28
0.48
0.69
0.61
0.58
0.74
0.84
Figure 4. Fractional depths of four CH4 ice absorption bands as a function
of sub-Earth longitude on Pluto. As in Fig. 3, each point represents data
from one night's observations, with the horizontal error bar indicating the
duration of the observations and the vertical error bar indicating the 1-σ un-
certainty in the measured depth of the indicated band. Sinusoidal fits are
shown with dotted lines, with parameter values listed in Table 2. The
larger scatter in fractional depths of the deeper bands is mostly due to secu-
lar evolution, as discussed in Section 4, but the stronger bands are also
more vulnerable to variable contamination by Charon light.
9
Figure 5. Comparison of the longitude of maximum absorp-
tion (determined from sinusoidal fits as shown in Fig. 4) and
average fractional band depth, for the dozen methane bands
listed in Table 2. Horizontal bars represent the 1-σ uncertainty
in the maximum absorption longitude and vertical bars indi -
cate the peak-to-peak amplitude of the sinusoidal fit. A linear
regression is shown with a dashed line.
Correlation between Pluto's
near-infrared CH4 band depths and
visible lightcurve has been noted
long ago (e.g., Buie and Fink 1987;
Marcialis and Lebofsky 1991), and
is also evident in our data. This
longitudinal pattern is strikingly
different from the Charon-centered
geometry of the CO ice absorption.
Correlation between Pluto's CH4
band depths and the visual
lightcurve supports a correlation
between CH4 absorption and
albedo that has been suggested pre-
viously (e.g., Grundy and Buie
2001). But the IRTF data show
subtle differences from one CH4
band to the next. Plotting the lon-
gitude where each CH4 band shows
its maximum absorption against the
mean fractional depth of each band
(Fig. 5) reveals a strong correlation,
with deeper bands showing maxi-
mum absorption near 260° E and
shallower bands showing their maximum absorption further east, toward the Charon-facing
hemisphere. This contrast between Pluto's weaker and stronger CH4 bands has also been noted
previously (e.g., Grundy and Fink 1996; Grundy and Buie 2001) and interpreted as indicating
that the CH4 responsible for producing the deeper CH4 bands is more prevalent at longitudes cor-
responding to Pluto's lightcurve maximum, while terrains with the larger particle sizes or greater
CH4 enrichment needed to boost the depths of weaker CH4 absorptions occur more on the
Charon-facing hemisphere.
3.3 Nitrogen Ice
N2 is a non-polar molecule, so vibrational absorptions are not easily excited by incident
photons. However, when the molecule's electron distribution is temporarily distorted by interac-
tion with a neighboring molecule, a weak “collisionally induced” fundamental absorption appears
at 4.25 µm with an even weaker overtone in our wavelength range at 2.15 µm (e.g., Shapiro and
Gush 1966; Owen et al. 1993; Clark et al. 2013). This band appears as a subtle feature just to the
left of a much deeper CH4 ice band at 2.2 µm (see Fig. 1). The N2 absorption is difficult to disen-
tangle from the wings of the CH4 band, requiring detailed modeling for an accurate estimation of
the N2 abundance (to be presented in a separate paper). But we can get a crude idea of the longi-
tudinal distribution of N2 absorption by computing an equivalent width, as we did for CO ice.
Here we used wavelengths from 2.115 to 2.130 µm and from 2.165 to 2.180 µm to compute a
linear continuum model and integrated one minus spectrum/continuum from 2.130 to 2.165 µm.
The result, plotted in Fig. 6, has considerable scatter, but shows greater N2 absorption on the anti-
Charon hemisphere, similar to the pattern seen for CO ice, so we can tentatively associate both
ices with the bright anti-Charon spot in the Buie et al. (2010b) albedo map. That N2 and CO ices
would exhibit similar spatial distributions is not surprising, since the two ices have similar
volatilities (Brown and Ziegler 1980; Fray and Schmitt 2009) and are completely miscible in one
10
another (Vetter et al. 2007). The
absorptions of these two ices have
also been observed to have very
similar longitudinal distributions to
one another on Triton, Neptune's
large, captured satellite (Grundy et
al. 2010).
Another way to investigate
Pluto's N2 ice is via the much more
numerous CH4 ice bands. This is
possible because dilution of CH4 in
N2 ice has the effect of blue-shift-
ing the CH4 bands relative to their
positions in pure CH4 ice (Quirico
and Schmitt 1997b). Larger blue
shifts correspond to greater dilu-
tion factors (Brunetto et al. 2008).
An easy way to quantify the shift is
by cross-correlation relative to a
model for pure CH4 ice, as de-
scribed by Tegler et al (2008). The
results are shown for four methane
bands in Fig. 7. These (and other)
CH4 bands all show maximum blue
shifts when the anti-Charon hemi-
sphere is oriented toward Earth and
minimum blue shifts when the sub-
Charon hemisphere is visible, con-
sistent with the N2 distribution im-
plied by the equivalent width of
the N2 band.
As Fig. 7 shows, different
CH4 absorption bands have differ-
ent average blue shifts in wave-
length units. These different bands
also probe different average depths
into the surface of Pluto, with
more strongly absorbing bands
sampling, on average, less deep
within a particulate surface than
weaker bands do. This fact has
been used to search for depth-de-
pendent CH4/N2 ratios by compar-
ing shifts versus band depth (e.g.,
Licandro et al. 2006a,b; Tegler et
al. 2008; Abernathy et al. 2009;
Merlin et al. 2009, 2010). The not-
always consistent results of these
efforts point to an additional com-
Figure 6. Approximate equivalent width of the 2.15 µm N2
ice band as a function of sub-Earth longitude. Our use of a lin -
ear continuum approximation over wavelengths where there is
clearly some curvature due to the wings of the strong 2.2 µm
CH4 band can be expected to cause systematic underestimation
of the equivalent width, but at least it gives some idea of the
longitude dependence. The dotted curve is a sinusoid fitted to
the data, with a constant offset, amplitude, and phase as free
parameters. The fitted values are 0.92 nm, 0.33 nm, and 209°,
respectively.
Figure 7. Wavelength shifts of four of Pluto's CH4 bands as a
function of sub-Earth longitude, as measured by cross-correla-
tion. All bands are blue-shifted relative to the corresponding
absorption bands in pure CH4 (negative wavelength shifts) ,
consistent with dilution in N2 ice. In all bands, greater blue
shifts are seen on the anti-Charon hemisphere, consistent with
greater dilution of CH4 in N2 ice on that hemisphere.
11
plication: CH4 is not soluble in N2 at all concentrations. When the solubility limit is exceeded,
two separate phases co-exist, one CH4-rich, and the other N2-rich, as described by the binary
phase diagram (Prokhvatilov and Yantsevich 1983; Lunine and Stephenson 1985). CH4 bands in
the N2-rich phase exhibit blue shifts like those reported by Quirico and Schmitt (1997b) while
CH4 bands in the CH4-rich phase exhibit much smaller blue shifts that have yet to be measured in
the laboratory in a systematic way, although that work is now in progress. What the cross-corre-
lation technique treats as a single shifted band should actually be modeled as a superposition of
two distinct absorption bands. Approximating the CH4-rich phase with pure CH4 optical con-
stants from Grundy et al. (2002) and the N2-rich phase with a shifted version of the same, Tegler
et al. (2010, 2012) fitted a two-phase model to a series of both weak and strong CH4 bands, find-
ing no convincing evidence for compositional trends with band depth. Applying a model like
that to this new data set will enable much more quantitative compositional conclusions as a func-
tion of longitude and is the subject of a separate paper.
4. Secular Evolution
The past dozen years span only a tiny fraction of Pluto's 2.5 centuries-long heliocentric or-
bit, but over that time the sub-Earth latitude on Pluto has progressed northward by some 20°,
from around 28° N in 2001 to 48° N in 2012. It will be 51° N when the New Horizons probe en-
counters the system in July 2015, and will reach its maximum of about 60° N during 2025 to
2033. The recent latitude change is as large as it is because Pluto's true anomaly advances rela-
tively rapidly near perihelion and because Pluto's obliquity is high. Secular spectral changes po-
tentially detectable in our IRTF data could result from a static distribution of ices on Pluto with a
distinct composition in more northerly latitudes increasingly contributing to the spectra due to the
shifting viewing geometry. Changes could also be produced by seasonal volatile transport driv-
ing evolution of the texture, composition, or spatial distribution of Pluto's volatile ices (e.g.,
Hansen and Paige 1996; Spencer et
al. 1997; Trafton et al. 1998;
Young 2012a). The temporal base-
line can be extended by including
observations from the 1990s ob-
tained at Lowell Observatory's 72"
Perkins telescope (Grundy and
Buie 2001), although those data
have much lower spectral resolu-
tion of around R ≈ 300 and a more
restricted wavelength coverage of
1.20 to 2.35 µm. Taking the
1.72 µm CH4 band as an example,
its fractional depth as a function of
longitude is shown in Fig. 8 for
three epochs, 1998, 2001-2002, and
2011-2012. Other strong CH4
bands (not shown here) exhibit
similar-looking trends. Grundy
and Buie (2001) observed that
Pluto's strong CH4 bands were get-
ting deeper during the 1990s. That
trend has evidently continued in the
past decade. If the explanation is
Figure 8. Secular evolution of the diurnal variation of CH4 ice
absorption on Pluto, as measured by the fractional depth of the
1.72 µm band during three different epochs, indicated by dis -
tinct plotting symbols . In creating this figure, we resampled
the IRTF spectra to match the lower spectral resolution of the
1998 data. Dashed lines indicate low-order Fourier fits to the
three different data subsets.
12
geometric, the secular increase in CH4 band depths would imply strong CH4 absorption at the
high north latitudes on Pluto that are increasingly coming into view. The pattern of longitudinal
variation has also evolved, with diurnal variability declining in amplitude consistent with the in-
creasing contribution to the observed spectrum of northern polar regions (currently visible
throughout Pluto's diurnal cycle) at the expense of more highly modulated contributions from
equatorial and southern latitudes.
The evolution of the
longitudinal variability of
Pluto's strong CH4 bands
shares certain features with
the evolution of the visible
lightcurve, shown in Fig. 9
(data from Buie et al.
1997, 2010b). The ampli-
tudes of both types of vari-
ation have decreased, with
longitudes around 100° E
contributing disproportion-
ately to the decrease. Buie
et al. (2010a) argued for an
especially rapid period of
evolution during the early
2000s, with Pluto's surface
coloration and albedo pat-
terns causing rapid changes
in its lightcurve. To search
for a potentially non-uni-
form rate of change in the
CH4 ice absorptions, we
plotted the average band depth along with the maximum and minimum from a Fourier fit to
pooled data from six different time intervals in Fig. 10. These data are also suggestive of rela-
tively rapid evolution around the late 1990s and early 2000s.
We noted earlier that Pluto's weak CH4 absorption bands behave differently from the
stronger bands, in terms of their longitudinal distribution. The same is true of their secular evo-
lution. Grundy and Fink (1996) reported the very weak 0.72 µm band to be decreasing in
strength from the 1980s through early 1990s, rather than increasing like the strong CH4 bands.
The weakest bands that can be reliably measured in our IRTF spectra are a little stronger than
that particular band, so they may not be directly comparable, but the three weakest bands we
measured do not show the secular depth increase that the stronger bands show, except right
around 90° east longitude. Averaged over all longitudes, the change in CH4 band depth is shown
in Fig. 11 as a function of band depth for the same twelve CH4 bands discussed earlier. A linear
fit to these measurements becomes negative for band depths below about 10%, consistent with
the Grundy and Fink (1996) observation of a declining 0.72 µm band, which had a fractional
depth of around 6% at the time of those observations.
The plots of CO and N2 absorption versus longitude (Figs. 3 and 6) have too much scatter
to show obvious trends in just the 2001-2002 and 2011-2012 data subsets, so we grouped the
data into two larger subsets, one consisting of all data taken during 2001 through 2006 (25
nights) and the other consisting of all data taken during 2007 through 2012 (39 nights). The am-
Figure 9. Evolution of Pluto's visible lightcurve over one decade, based
on Hubble Space Telescope observations obtained during 1992-1993
and during 2002-2003 (Buie et al. 1997, 2010a; see also Buratti et al.
2003). Over that time interval, Pluto's visual lightcurve amplitude de-
clined, mostly as a result of increasing flux near lightcurve minimum.
13
Figure 10. Secular evolution of Fourier fits to the longitudinal variation of CH4 ice absorption, from
six groups of Pluto spectra, indicated by six rectangular zones . The horizontal extent of each zone cor -
responds to the dates of observations included in each group. The bottom and top of each zone indicate
the minimum and maximum absorption in the Fourier fit, while the central line shows the average over
all longitudes. White rectangles are based on the new IRTF data presented here, while gray rectangles
are based on Perkins data (Grundy and Buie 2001). The IRTF data were resampled to the lower resolu -
tion of the Perkins data in making this plot. There appears to have been somewhat more rapid evolu-
tion of the CH4 ice absorption some time between ~1998 and ~2006, but the cadence of our observa-
tions limits determination of the exact time-history of this evolution (and despite our efforts to account
for the different spectral resolutions, caution is always warranted when comparing data from different
instruments).
Figure 11. Secular changes in a dozen CH4 absorption bands over the 10 year interval between 2001-
2002 and 2011-2012 data subsets, showing a strong correlation between rate of change and fractional
band depths. The points are averages over all longitudes from Fourier fits such as shown in Fig. 8 and
the dashed line is a linear fit to those averages. The vertical bars indicate the minimum and maximum
observed change for each band. The maximum change is generally seen at longitudes near 90 ° E while
the minimum change tends to be seen around 200° E.
14
plitudes and constant offsets of the sinusoidal fits shown in Figs. 3 and 6 were refitted to each
six-year group of data, while holding the phase constant. For both N2 and CO absorptions, the
average equivalent widths declined from the first group to the second, suggesting a secular de-
cline in absorption by both ices. The N2 average dropped from 1.08 ± 0.03 to 0.82 ± 0.02 µm
and the CO average dropped from 0.136 ± 0.005 to 0.125 ± 0.005 nm. The N2 peak-to-peak am-
plitude dropped negligibly, from 0.64 ± 0.08 to 0.63 ± 0.07 µm while the CO amplitude declined
from 0.153 ± 0.016 to 0.118 ± 0.015 nm. Only the change in N2 average equivalent width looks
statistically significant, but taken together, these numbers are suggestive of a secular decline in
Pluto's CO and N2 absorptions that would be consistent with those volatile ices being more
prevalent at lower latitudes that are gradually becoming more foreshortened as the sub-Earth lati-
tude moves north. If these ices were especially prevalent in the high albedo region near Pluto's
anti-Charon point, we would expect to see their absorptions gradually decline as the sub-Earth
latitude moves north, especially around longitude 180° E.
Another, even more exciting possibility is that we could be witnessing the seasonal re-
moval of volatile N2 and CO ices from the northern hemisphere through the action of so-
lar-driven volatile transport. Changes in Pluto's surface ices are difficult to distinguish from
changes due to geometry with our spatially unresolved observations, but Grundy and Buie (2001)
suggested one possible way to identify which mechanism is responsible. Parallax from Earth's
motion around the Sun offers views of Pluto differing by almost four degrees between pre- and
post-opposition quadrature. Due to Pluto's high obliquity, much of the parallax translates into
shifting sub-Earth latitudes on Pluto. As mentioned before, the sub-Earth latitude on Pluto has
moved north by around 20° over the past dozen years, but this motion is modulated by the annual
parallax variation. It is thus possible to schedule a pair of observations separated by a year plus a
few months, such that the sub-Earth longitude and latitude are almost perfectly duplicated.
Thanks to the impressive scheduling flexibility of the IRTF team, we were able to observe Pluto
on three such pairs of UT dates, indicated as circled pairs in Fig. 2: 2005 April 15 and 2006 July
19, 2005 May 9 and 2006 July 24, and 2005 May 23 and 2006 July 25, corresponding to longi-
tudes 105°, 188°, and 128° E, respectively. For each of these pairs, the sub-Earth longitude dif-
ference was less than 5° and the latitude difference was less than 0.5° (see Table 1). If changing
geometry were solely responsible for the secular evolution, we should see little or no change in
each of these matched pairs, since the observing geometries are so similar. If seasonal volatile
transport were solely responsible, we would expect to see changes consistent with the longer
term rate of change.
The sinusoids fitted to CO and N2 ice absorptions in the 2001-2006 and 2007-2012 data
subsets described above provide an estimate of the baseline rate of change in the absorptions of
these ices as a function of longitude. According to the fitted sine functions, both absorptions de-
cline over time at all three longitudes of our matched pairs. Taking the time base between the
two data subsets to be six years, for the relevant longitudes we find average rates of change in
equivalent widths of −0.043 nm yr−1 for N2 and −0.0038 nm yr−1 for CO. Turning to the matched
pairs, with an average time separation of 1.2 years, we see N2 absorption decline by a much
slower −0.004 ± 0.014 nm yr−1 while CO absorption actually increases by
+0.002 ± 0.017 nm yr−1. Both numbers are consistent with no change at all. The N2 rate of de-
cline in the matched pair being just over 3-σ smaller than the longer term rate of −0.043 nm yr−1
favors geometry over volatile transport as the leading explanation of the declining N2 absorption
over the past dozen years. But the substantial uncertainty leaves open the possibility of volatile
transport accounting for at least some of the overall decline, let alone the fact that we do not
know whether the decline of N2 ice absorption is uniform in time, or is perhaps more punctuated
or episodic, like the changes in CH4 absorption and in visual colors and lightcurve seem to be.
Our CO measurement in the matched pairs is unfortunately too insensitive to put comparable
15
constraints on the cause of the apparent decline in that absorption.
Although it is less volatile than CO and N2, and thus less expected to show rapid seasonal
effects of volatile transport, we also examined the CH4 ice bands in the geometrically matched
pairs. The longer term evolution shown in Fig. 8 indicates a strong dependence on longitude that
must be taken into account. That plot shows maximum secular evolution of about +0.10 µm in
fractional band depth of the 1.72 µm band over ten years at a longitude of around 100° E, sug-
gesting that of our three matched pairs, the pair obtained near 105° E should be the most sensi-
tive to changes in CH4 absorption. If volatile transport was responsible, this pair should show an
increase of around +0.013 µm over the 1.3 year interval between that pair of observations. In-
stead we observed a decrease of −0.018 ± 0.010 µm. Using the 2001-2002 and 2011-2012 data
subsets, we measured the changes for the 12 CH4 bands in Table 2. Figure 11 shows larger long-
term increases for the stronger bands. We did the same for our 105° E matched pair, and only the
three weakest bands showed increases. The strong bands weakened. We would have expected a
strengthening trend in the matched pairs if volatile transport alone explained the observed long-
term trend, and no change if geometry alone was responsible. Neither hypothesis called for a
weakening of these bands. Grundy and Buie (2001) noted a similar weakening trend in geometri-
cally matched pairs from 1997 and 1998, although it was not statistically distinguishable from
zero in their data. If we interpret the 1.72 µm band data as saying a −0.018 µm change in band
depths in 1.3 years was due to volatile transport, that would imply an offsetting change of
+0.031 µm in 1.3 years due to geometric factors, in order to reconcile the two observations.
Such a scenario is possible if a CH4-rich northern polar cap is rotating into view and losing its
CH4 ice absorptions to volatile transport at the same time. But again, potential non-uniformity of
the secular change suggested by Fig. 10 raises questions as to the validity of the test offered by
the geometrically matched pairs.
Other possible types of change could also affect the observed spectra. For instance, chang-
ing ice textures could lead to observable changes in band depth. A shrinking mean grain size in a
particulate surface, perhaps due to sublimation or fracturing, would lead to reduced optical path
lengths and thus reduced absorption band depths. Scenarios like this are to be explored in a sepa-
rate paper involving radiative transfer modeling of the absorption bands. A variety of shorter
term transient changes could also potentially be detected in time-series spectral data. These
might occur in the wake of some sort of large scale eruption or weather event, as has been sug-
gested for Triton (Hicks and Buratti 2004). Outlier points, the sort of signature that might be ex-
pected from a transient event, can certainly be found in our plots of various absorption band
strengths versus longitude. But in all cases, the outliers were found to arise from the lowest qual-
ity spectra obtained, attributable to poor sky conditions and/or short total integration times. Ac-
cordingly, it seems unwise to ascribe any significance to them.
5. Grand Average
Combining data from all 65 nights yields the very high signal-to-noise grand average spec-
trum shown in Fig. 12. Since the wavelengths of SpeX's pixels shift slightly from night to night,
merging the spectra required resampling them all to a common wavelength scale, for which we
used a wavelength grid with a constant resolution of R = 1100 (wavelength divided by double the
sample spacing), providing a reasonable match to our lower resolution spectra. Detailed radia-
tive transfer modeling of this grand average product will be presented in companion papers, but
some quick comparisons are worth making here.
An examination of the shape of the N2 ice absorption at 2.15 µm shows it to be consistent
with the hexagonal β phase of N2 ice (see Fig. 13). The cubic α phase of N2 has a much narrower
band. That phase is only stable at temperatures below 35.61 K for pure N2 ice (Scott 1976), es-
16
Figure 12. Grand average IRTF/SpeX spectrum of Pluto with absorptions of CO, CH4, and N2 ices la-
beled.
tablishing a firm lower limit on Pluto's N2 ice temperature. A much cruder upper limit on the N2
ice temperature can be set by the presence of a shoulder on the right side of the N2 band at around
2.162 µm. In pure N2 ice, this feature only appears below approximately 41 K (Grundy et al.
1993), implying an N2 ice temperature between 35.61 and ~41 K, consistent with the conclusions
of Tryka et al. (1994). However,
caution is advisable for two rea-
sons. First, published correspon-
dences between spectral features
and temperatures are for pure N2
ice, and as discussed earlier, Pluto's
N2 ice should have CH4 and CO
dissolved in it (and perhaps also ar-
gon, e.g., Tegler et al. 2010). More
laboratory work is needed on the
temperature-dependent spectral be-
havior of N2 in the presence of
these probable contaminants. Sec-
ond, the hydrogen Brackett γ line
(Brackett 1922) produces a Fraun-
hofer absorption in the solar spec-
trum at 2.160 µm. We checked ra-
tios between spectra of our different
solar analog stars and this line
seems to cancel out reasonably well
in the ratios, but we do not have a
direct comparison between the solar
analogs and the Sun itself. Flexure
Figure 13. Comparison of our Pluto grand average spectrum
with that of Triton (from Grundy et al. 2010) in the region of
the N2 ice overtone band, showing the main N2 absorption at
2.147 µm and also a weaker side-band at about 2.162 µm, in-
dicative of N2 ice temperatures below ~41 K.
17
within the instrument can result in wavelength shifts and thus imperfect cancellation, even if the
stellar emission perfectly matched the solar spectrum.
In spectra of Triton, Nep-
tune's large captured satellite, CO2
ice has been detected through three
strong, narrow, vibrational absorp-
tion bands near 2 µm, along with
several weaker bands (Cruikshank
et al. 1993, 1998b; Hansen 1997;
Grundy et al. 2010). These absorp-
tions have not been seen in spectra
of Pluto. Figure 14 shows a
zoomed-in view of both Triton and
Pluto grand averages in the region
of the CO2 ice bands. No trace of
CO2 ice absorption can be seen in
the Pluto spectrum. Not being de-
tected at the signal precision of our
grand average spectrum implies
that less than 3% of the observed
surface of the Pluto-Charon system
could be covered with Triton-like
material. DeMeo et al. (2010)
searched for ethane ice absorptions
in Pluto spectra obtained in 2005,
finding features consistent with
pure C2H6 ice at 2.274, 2.405,
2.457, and 2.461 µm. Our grand
average spectrum looks consistent
with their data at 2.274 and
2.405 µm (see Fig. 12), but our
wavelength coverage does not extend to the two longer wavelength bands. DeMeo et al. also
searched for, but did not see a weaker C2H6 ice absorption at 2.015 µm in their Pluto spectra.
Our grand average also shows no obvious absorption at that wavelength, nor at the wavelengths
of three other nearby C2H6 ice bands at 2.021, 2.030, and 2.054 µm.
6. Summary
New 0.8-2.4 µm spectral observations of the Pluto system were obtained at IRTF/SpeX
during 65 nights from 2001 through 2012. The data reveal striking inhomogeneities in the spatial
distributions of Pluto's ice absorptions. When the anti-Charon hemisphere (180° E) is oriented
toward Earth, carbon monoxide ice absorption is almost triple what is seen half a Pluto day later,
when the sub-Charon hemisphere (0° E) is oriented toward Earth. Although there is considerable
scatter in our N2 ice equivalent width numbers, the longitudinal pattern of that absorption appears
to be at least crudely similar to that of the CO ice. Blue shifts of CH4 bands, attributed to dilu-
tion of CH4 in N2 ice, are also at their greatest at this longitude. In contrast, the strong CH4 ice
bands show their maximum absorption around 260° E, almost 90° out of phase with the CO and
N2 ices. Weaker CH4 absorptions are even further out of phase with CO and N2, with their maxi-
mum absorptions shifted even further toward the sub-Charon hemisphere. These longitudinal
Figure 14. Comparison of our Pluto grand average spectrum
with that of Triton (from Grundy et al. 2010) in the region
where Triton's spectrum features three strong and narrow CO2
ice absorption bands. No trace whatsoever of these CO2 ice
absorptions can be seen in the Pluto spectrum at the relevant
wavelengths, indicated by upward-pointing arrows. The thin
gray curve is a linear mixture of 3% Triton and 97% Pluto. If
3% of Pluto's surface had been composed of Triton-like mate-
rial, the CO2 absorptions would have been visible in our data.
The downward-pointing arrows indicate wavelengths of C2H6
ice absorption bands. Corresponding dips are not apparent in
our Pluto grand average spectrum.
18
patterns are illustrated schematically in Fig. 15. Grundy and Fink (1996) divided an albedo map
of Pluto into three zones according to albedo to create a hypothetical distribution of three differ-
ent compositional provinces on Pluto. This distribution of ices was able to match a number of
features of Pluto's spectral variability and has subsequently been adapted and modified by various
authors (e.g., Lellouch et al. 2000, 2011; Grundy and Buie 2001). The new IRTF data set offers
an important test for the various versions of this map, to be presented in a companion paper.
Figure 15. Approximate longitudes where various spectral characteristics
reach their maxima in sinusoidal fits are indicated by gray battleship hulls,
with corresponding minima indicated by dotted outlines at the same height.
Also shown are the Buie et al. (2010a,b) lightcurve and V wavelength albedo
map from HST observations during 2002-2003. In addition to sub- and anti-
Charon longitudes on Pluto, the leading and trailing apex longitudes are
marked. These are offset from the usual 270° and 90° for a tidally-locked
satellite due to Pluto's proximity to the system barycenter.
CH4 ice is much less volatile than N2 and CO, with a vapor pressure at 40 K roughly three
orders of magnitude below those of CO and N2 (Fray and Schmitt 2009). The volatility contrast
between CH4 and the other two ices suggests that their distinct distributions could represent the
product of sorting by volatility. Such a pattern could perhaps be controlled by elevation if Pluto
has a fossil tidal bulge or a displacement of its center of mass relative to its center of body, lead-
ing to a near-side/far-side dichotomy like Earth's moon has. Large-scale patterns in Pluto's inter-
nal heat flow offer another possible explanation. The remarkably unbalanced volatile ice distri-
bution is reminiscent of the Moore and Spencer (1990) “Koyaanismuuyaw” hypothesis of a
perennially dichotomous Triton. The Charon-centered symmetry of Pluto's N2 and CO ice distri-
butions is especially intriguing. Triton's volatile ices show a comparably symmetric distribution
around Triton's sub-Neptune point, except that in Triton's case the N2 and CO ices are concen-
trated on the sub- rather than the anti-Neptune hemisphere (Grundy et al. 2010).
19
Longer term changes in Pluto's ice absorptions are also evident in the data. The strong CH4
bands are getting stronger while the CO and N2 absorptions are declining in strength. A possible
explanation could be that the north polar regions that have been swinging more into view since
equinox in the mid-1980s have more CH4 ice and less CO and N2. However, volatile transport
models (e.g., Hansen and Paige 1996; Spencer et al. 1997; Trafton et al. 1998; Young 2012a)
suggest that volatile N2 (and presumably also CO) should have been accumulating at high north-
ern latitudes during the long southern summer that just ended in the 1980s. Now that those
northern latitudes are receiving continuous sunlight, the CO and N2 should be sublimating away,
but the fact that the atmospheric pressure is increasing rather than declining suggests they have
not yet been exhausted from the northern hemisphere (Young 2012a,b). To get an idea of
whether the observed decline in N2 and CO is due to sublimation removal of those species from
observable latitudes on Pluto, or simply from the changing observing geometry, we did observa-
tions on three pairs of nights selected to be separated in time by a little over a year, but with al-
most no change in observing geometry. Those observations showed less change than would be
expected on the basis of the time interval between them, and thus favor the geometric explana-
tion. Oddly, the CH4 absorptions in the geometrically matched pairs diminished, contrary to the
long-term strengthening trend for those absorptions. Both long-term and matched-pair CH4 be-
haviors can be explained if volatile transport is reducing the strengths of the CH4 bands at the
same time as geometric effects are increasing them. Averaged over the past decade, the two ef-
fects combine to result in an overall increase in CH4 band strengths, but if geometry is held con-
stant, only the volatile transport weakening effect is seen.
This evidence for complex and time-variable spatial distributions of volatile ices on Pluto
is tantalizing, but ambiguities between geometric and volatile transport interpretations of spectral
changes hamper interpretation of the behavior of Pluto's volatile ices. NASA's New Horizons
spacecraft will get a much more detailed view when it flies through the Pluto system in 2015
(Young et al. 2008). New Horizons' Linear Etalon Imaging Spectral Array (LEISA) will return
near-infrared spectral maps covering wavelengths from 1.25 to 2.50 µm at a spectral resolution
of R ≈ 240 with higher resolution coverage of R ≈ 560 between 2.10 and 2.25 m (Reuter et al.
2008). LEISA will map Pluto's ices at spatial resolutions as high as 10 km/pixel. Once the 2015
distribution of ices is known, ambiguities between geometric and volatile transport effects can be
broken, making a long-term spectral monitoring data set such as presented here immensely valu-
able for investigating the rate at which Pluto's spatial distributions of ices are changing in time.
However, we should also emphasize the need for laboratory measurements currently in progress
on temperature-dependent spectral behaviors of the mixed N2, CO, and CH4 phases expected to
be present on the surface of Pluto from thermodynamic considerations. These data are essential
for interpretations of the New Horizons data, as well as ground-based spectral observations such
as presented here.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully thank the staff of IRTF for their tremendous assistance over the
dozen years of this project, especially W. Golisch, D. Griep, P. Sears, E. Volquardsen, S.J. Bus,
J.T. Rayner, and A.T. Tokunaga. As with any long-term project, a great many other people and
organizations have contributed in various ways over the years, including R.S. Bussmann, K.
Crane, J.R. Spencer, J.A. Stansberry, S.B. Porter, and S.D. Tegler, and JPL's Horizons ephemeris
services. The work was funded in part by NSF grants AST-0407214 and AST-0085614 and
NASA grants NAG5-4210 and NAG5-12516. We wish to recognize and acknowledge the sig-
nificant cultural role and reverence of the summit of Mauna Kea within the indigenous Hawaiian
community and to express our appreciation for the opportunity to observe from this special
20
mountain. Finally, we thank the free and open source software communities for empowering us
with key software tools used to complete this project, notably Linux, the GNU tools, LibreOffice,
MySQL, Evolution, Python, and FVWM.
REFERENCES
Abernathy, M.R., S.C. Tegler, W.M. Grundy, J. Licandro, W. Romanishin, D. Cornelison, and F. Vilas
2009. Digging into the surface of the icy dwarf planet Eris. Icarus 199, 520-525.
Brackett, F.S. 1922. Visible and infra-red radiation of hydrogen. Astrophys. J. 56, 154-161.
Brown, G.N., Jr., and W.T. Ziegler 1980. Vapor pressure and heats of vaporization and sublimation of
liquids and solids of interest in cryogenics below 1-atm pressure. Adv. Cryogenic Eng. 25, 662-670.
Brunetto, R., G. Caniglia, G.A. Baratta, and M.E. Palumbo 2008. Integrated near-infrared band strengths
of solid CH4 and its mixtures with N2. Astrophys. J. 686, 1480-1485.
Buie, M.W., and U. Fink 1987. Methane absorption variations in the spectrum of Pluto. Icarus 70, 483-
498.
Buie, M.W., D.J. Tholen, and L.H. Wasserman 1997. Separate lightcurves of Pluto and Charon. Icarus
125, 233-244.
Buie, M.W., and W.M. Grundy 2000. The distribution and physical state of H 2O on Charon. Icarus 148,
324-339.
Buie, M.W., W.M. Grundy, E.F. Young, L.A. Young, and S.A. Stern 2010a. Pluto and Charon with HST
I: Monitoring global change and improved surface properties from lightcurves. Astron. J. 139, 1117-
1127.
Buie, M.W., W.M. Grundy, E.F. Young, L.A. Young, and S.A. Stern 2010b. Pluto and Charon with HST
II: Resolving changes on Pluto's surface and a map for Charon. Astron. J. 139, 1128-1143.
Buie, M.W., D.J. Tholen, and W.M. Grundy 2012. The orbit of Charon is circular. Astron. J. 144, 15.1-
19.
Buratti, B.J., J.K. Hillier, A. Heinze, M.D. Hicks, K.A. Tryka, J.A. Mosher, J. Ward, M. Garske, J.
Young, and J. Atienza-Rosel 2003. Photometry of Pluto in the last decade and before: Evidence for
volatile transport? Icarus 162, 171-182.
Bus, S.J., A.J. Denault, J.T. Rayner, R.P. Binzel, and M. Birlan 2002. Remote observing at the NASA
Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF). Proc. SPIE 4845, 94-99.
Clark, R.N., R. Carlson, W. Grundy, and K. Noll 2013. Observed ices in the solar system. In: M.S.
Gudipati and J. Castillo-Rogez (Eds.), The Science of Solar System Ices , Springer, New York, 3-46.
Cruikshank, D.P., T.L. Roush, T.C. Owen, T.R. Geballe, C. de Bergh, B. Schmitt, R.H. Brown, and M.J.
Bartholomew 1993. Ices on the surface of Triton. Science 261, 742-745.
Cruikshank, D.P., R.H. Brown, W.M. Calvin, T.L. Roush, and M.J. Bartholomew 1998a. Ices on the
satellites of Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus. In: B. Schmitt, C. de Bergh, M. Festou (Eds.), Solar Sys-
tem Ices, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 579-606.
Cruikshank, D.P., T.L. Roush, T.C. Owen, E. Quirico, and C. de Bergh 1998b. The surface compositions
of Triton, Pluto, and Charon. In: B. Schmitt, C. de Bergh, M. Festou (Eds.), Solar System Ices,
Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 655-684.
de Bergh, C., E.L. Schaller, M.E. Brown, R. Brunetto, D.P. Cruikshank, and B. Schmitt 2013. The ices
on transneptunian objects and Centaurs . In: M.S. Gudipati and J. Castillo-Rogez (Eds.), The Sci-
ence of Solar System Ices , Springer, New York, 107-146.
DeMeo, F.E., C. Dumas, C. de Bergh, S. Protopapa, D.P. Cruikshank, T.R. Geballe, A. Alvarez-Candal,
F. Merlin, and M.A. Barucci 2010. A search for ethane on Pluto and Triton. Icarus 208, 412-424.
Douté, S., B. Schmitt, E. Quirico, T.C. Owen, D.P. Cruikshank, C. de Bergh, T.R. Geballe, and T.L.
Roush 1999. Evidence for methane segregation at the surface of Pluto. Icarus 142, 421-444.
Elliot, J.L., A. Ates, B.A. Babcock, A.S. Bosh, M.W. Buie, K.B. Clancy, E.W. Dunham, S.S. Eikenberry,
D.T. Hall, S.D. Kern, S.K. Leggett, S.E. Levine, D.S. Moon, C.B. Olkin, D.J. Osip, J.M. Pasachoff,
21
B.E. Penprase, M.J. Person, S. Qu, J.T. Rayner, L.C. Roberts Jr, C.V. Salyk, S.P. Souza, R.C. Stone,
B.W. Taylor, D.J. Tholen, J.E. Thomas-Osip, D.R. Ticehurst, and L.H. Wasserman 2003. The re -
cent expansion of Pluto's atmosphere. Nature 424, 165-168.
Fink, U., and M.A. DiSanti 1988. The separate spectra of Pluto and its satellite Charon. Astron. J. 95,
229-236.
Fray, N., and B. Schmitt 2009. Sublimation of ices of astrophysical interest: A bibliographic review.
Planet. Space Sci. 57, 2053-2080.
Grundy, W.M., B. Schmitt, and E. Quirico 1993. The temperature dependent spectra of alpha and beta
nitrogen ice with application to Triton. Icarus 105, 254-258.
Grundy, W.M., and U. Fink 1996. Synoptic CCD spectrophotometry of Pluto over the past 15 years.
Icarus 124, 329-343.
Grundy, W.M., and M.W. Buie 2001. Distribution and evolution of CH 4, N2, and CO ices on Pluto's sur-
face: 1995 to 1998. Icarus 153, 248-263.
Grundy, W.M., and M.W. Buie 2002. Spatial and compositional constraints on non-ice components and
H2O on Pluto's surface. Icarus 157, 128-138.
Grundy, W.M., B. Schmitt, and E. Quirico 2002. The temperature-dependent spectrum of methane ice I
between 0.7 and 5 µm and opportunities for near-infrared remote thermometry. Icarus 155, 486-
496.
Grundy, W.M., L.A. Young, J.A. Stansberry, M.W. Buie, C.B. Olkin, and E.F. Young 2010. Near-in -
frared spectral monitoring of Triton with IRTF/SpeX II: Spatial distribution and evolution of ices.
Icarus 205, 594-604.
Hansen, C.J., and D.A. Paige 1996. Seasonal nitrogen cycles on Pluto. Icarus 120, 247-265.
Hansen, G.B. 1997. The infrared absorption spectrum of carbon dioxide ice from 1.8 to 333 µm. J. Geo-
phys. Res. 102, 21569-21587.
Hanuschik, R.W. 2003. A flux-calibrated, high-resolution atlas of optical sky emission from UVES. As-
tron. & Astrophys. 407, 1157-1164.
Hicks, M.D., and B.J. Buratti 2004. The spectral variability of Triton from 1997-2000. Icarus 171, 210-
218.
Horne, K. 1986. An optimal extraction algorithm for CCD spectroscopy. Pub. Astron. Soc. Pacific 98,
609-617.
Lellouch, E., R. Laureijs, B. Schmitt, E. Quirico, C. de Bergh, J. Crovisier, and A. Coustenis 2000.
Pluto's non-isothermal surface. Icarus 147, 220-250.
Lellouch, E., C. de Bergh, B. Sicardy, H.U. Kaufl, and A. Smette 2011. High resolution spectroscopy of
Pluto's atmosphere: Detection of the 2.3 µm CH4 bands and evidence for carbon monoxide. Astron.
& Astrophys. 530, L4.1-4.
Lunine, J.I., and D.J. Stevenson 1985. Physical state of volatiles on the surface of Triton. Nature 317,
238-240.
Marcialis, R.L., and L.A. Lebofsky 1991. CVF spectrophotometry of Pluto: Correlation of composition
with albedo. Icarus 89, 255-263.
Merlin, F., A. Alvarez-Candal, A. Delsanti, S. Fornasier, M.A. Barucci, F.E. DeMeo, C. de Bergh, A.
Doressoundiram, E. Quirico, and B. Schmitt 2009. Stratification of methane ice on Eris' surface.
Astron. J. 137, 315-328.
Merlin, F., M.A. Barucci, C. de Bergh, F.E. DeMeo, A. Alvarez-Candal, C. Dumas, and D.P. Cruikshank
2010. Chemical and physical properties of the variegated Pluto and Charon surfaces. Icarus 210,
930-943.
Moore, J.M., and J.R. Spencer 1990. Koyaanismuuyaw: The hypothesis of a perennially dichotomous
Triton. Geophys. Res. Lett. 17, 1757-1760.
Olkin, C.B., E.F. Young, L.A. Young, W. Grundy, B. Schmitt, A. Tokunaga, T. Owen, T. Roush, and H.
Terada 2007. Pluto's spectrum from 1.0 to 4.2 µm: Implications for surface properties. Astron. J.
133, 420-431.
22
Owen, T.C., T.L. Roush, D.P. Cruikshank, J.L. Elliot, L.A. Young, C. de Bergh, B. Schmitt, T.R.
Geballe, R.H. Brown, and M.J. Bartholomew 1993. Surface ices and atmospheric composition of
Pluto. Science 261, 745-748.
Prokhvatilov, A.I., and L.D. Yantsevich 1983. X-ray investigation of the equilibrium phase dia gram of
CH4-N2 solid mixtures. Sov. J. Low Temp. Phys. 9, 94-98.
Protopapa, S., H. Boehnhardt, T.M. Herbst, D.P. Cruikshank, W.M. Grundy, F. Merlin, and C.B. Olkin
2008. Surface characterization of Pluto and Charon by L and M band spectra. Astron. & Astrophys.
490, 365-375.
Quirico, E., and B. Schmitt 1997a. A spectroscopic study of CO diluted in N 2 ice: Applications for Tri -
ton and Pluto. Icarus 128, 181-188.
Quirico, E., and B. Schmitt 1997b. Near-infrared spectroscopy of simple hydrocarbons and carbon ox -
ides diluted in solid N2 and as pure ices: Implications for Triton and Pluto. Icarus 127, 354-378.
Rayner, J.T., D.W. Toomey, P.M. Onaka, A.J. Denault, W.E. Stahlberger, D.Y. Watanabe, and S.I. Wang
1998. SpeX: A medium-resolution IR spectrograph for IRTF. Proc. SPIE 3354, 468-479.
Rayner, J.T., D.W. Toomey, P.M. Onaka, A.J. Denault, W.E. Stahlberger, W.D. Vacca, M.C. Cushing,
and S. Wang 2003. SpeX: A medium-resolution 0.8-5.5 micron spectrograph and imager for the
NASA Infrared Telescope Facility. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 115, 362-382.
Reuter, D.C., S.A. Stern, J. Scherrer, D.E. Jennings, J.W. Baer, J. Hanley, L. Hardaway, A. Lunsford, S.
McMuldroch, J. Moore, C. Olkin, R. Parizek, H. Reitsma, D. Sabatke, J. Spencer, J. Stone, H.
Throop, J. Van Cleve, G.E. Weigle, and L.A. Young 2008. Ralph: A visible/infrared imager for the
New Horizons Pluto/Kuiper belt mission. Space Sci. Rev. 140, 129-154.
Rousselot, P., C. Lidman, J.G. Cuby, G. Moreels, and G. Monnet 2000. Night-sky spectral atlas of OH
emission lines in the near-infrared. Astron. & Astrophys. 354, 1134-1150.
Rudy, R.J., C.C. Venturini, D.K. Lynch, S. Mazuk, R.C. Puetter, and B.R. Perry 2003. 0.8-2.5 micron re -
flectance spectroscopy of Pluto. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 115, 484-489.
Schaefer, B.E., M.W. Buie, and L.T. Smith 2008. Pluto's light curve in 1933–1934. Icarus 197, 590-
598.
Scott, T.A. 1976. Solid and liquid nitrogen. Phys. Rep. 27, 89-157.
Shapiro, M.M., and H.P. Gush 1966. The collision-induced fundamental and first overtone bands of oxy -
gen and nitrogen. Can. J. Phys. 44, 949-963.
Showalter, M.R., D.P. Hamilton, H.A. Weaver, S.A. Stern, A.J. Steffl, and L.A. Young 2011. New satel-
lite of (134340) Pluto: S/2011 (134340) 1. IAU Circ. 9221.
Showalter, M.R., H.A. Weaver, S.A. Stern, A.J. Steffl, M.W. Buie, W.J. Merline, M.J. Mutchler, R.
Soummer, and H.B. Throop 2012. New satellite of (134340) Pluto: S/2012 (134340) 1. IAU Circ.
9253.
Sicardy, B., T. Widemann, E. Lellouch, C. Veillet, J.C. Cuillandre, F. Colas, F. Roques, W. Beisker, M.
Kretlow, A.M. Lagrange, E. Gendron, F. Lacombe, J. Lecacheux, C. Birnbaum, A. Fienga, C.
Leyrat, A. Maury, E. Raynaud, S. Renner, M. Schultheis, K. Brooks, A. Delsanti, O.R. Hainaut, R.
Gilmozzi, C. Lidman, J. Spyromilio, M. Rapaport, P. Rosenzweig, O. Naranjo, L. Porras, F. Diaz, H.
Calderon, S. Carrillo, A. Carvajal, E. Recalde, L. Gaviria Cavero, C. Montalvo, D. Barria, R. Cam-
pos, R. Duffard, and H. Levato 2003. Large changes in Pluto's atmosphere as revealed by recent
stellar occultations. Nature 424, 168-170.
Spencer, J.R., J.A. Stansberry, L.M. Trafton, E.F. Young, R.P. Binzel, and S.K. Croft 1997. Volatile
transport, seasonal cycles, and atmospheric dynamics on Pluto. In: S.A. Stern, D.J. Tholen (Eds.),
Pluto and Charon, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 435-473.
Tegler, S.C., W.M. Grundy, F. Vilas, W. Romanishin, D.M. Cornelison, and G.J. Consolmagno 2008.
Evidence of N2-ice on the surface of the icy dwarf Planet 136472 (2005 FY 9). Icarus 195, 844-850.
Tegler, S.C., D.M. Cornelison, W.M. Grundy, W. Romanishin, M.R. Abernathy, M.J. Bovyn, J.A. Burt,
D.E. Evans, C.K. Maleszewski, Z. Thompson, and F. Vilas 2010. Methane and nitrogen abundances
on Pluto and Eris. Astrophys. J. 725, 1296-1305.
23
Tegler, S.C., W.M. Grundy, C.B. Olkin, L.A. Young, W. Romanishin, D.M. Cornelison, and R. Kho -
dadadkouchaki 2012. Ice mineralogy across and into the surfaces of Pluto, Triton, and Eris. Astro-
phys. J. 751, 76.1-10.
Trafton, L.M., D.L. Matson, and J.A. Stansberry 1998. Surface/atmosphere interactions and volatile
transport (Triton, Pluto, and Io). In: B. Schmitt, C. de Bergh, M. Festou (Eds.), Solar System Ices,
Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 773-812.
Tryka, K.A., R.H. Brown, D.P. Cruikshank, T.C Owen, T.R. Geballe, and C. de Bergh 1994. Tempera-
ture of nitrogen ice on Pluto and its implications for flux measurements. Icarus 112, 513-527.
Verbiscer, A.J., D.E. Peterson, M.F. Skrutskie, M. Cushing, M.J. Nelson, J.D. Smith, and J.C. Wilson
2007. Simultaneous spatially-resolved near-infrared spectra of Pluto and Charon. Lunar and Plan-
etary Sci. Conf. 38, 2318-2319 (abstract).
Vetter, M., H.J. Jodl, and A. Brodyanski 2007. From optical spectra to phase diagrams: The binary mix-
ture N2-CO. Low Temp. Phys. 33, 1052-1060.
Weaver, H.A., S.A. Stern, M.J. Mutchler, A.J. Steffl, M.W. Buie, W.J. Merline, J.R. Spencer, E.F.
Young, and L.A. Young 2006. Discovery of two new satellites of Pluto. Nature 439, 943-945.
Young, L.A., S.A. Stern, H.A. Weaver, F. Bagenal, R.P. Binzel, B. Buratti, A.F. Cheng, D. Cruikshank,
G.R. Gladstone, W.M. Grundy, D.P. Hinson, M. Horanyi, D.E. Jennings, I.R. Linscott, D.J. McCo -
mas, W.B. McKinnon, R. McNutt, J.M. Moore, S. Murchie, C.B. Olkin, C.C. Porco, H. Reitsema,
D.C. Reuter, J.R. Spencer, D.C. Slater, D. Strobel, M.E. Summers, and G.L. Tyler 2008. New Hori -
zons: Anticipated scientific investigations at the Pluto system. Space Sci. Rev. 140, 93-127.
Young, L.A. 2012a. Volatile transport on inhomogeneous surfaces: I – Analytic expressions, with appli -
cation to Pluto’s day. Icarus 221, 80-88.
Young, L.A. 2012b. Pluto's seasons: New predictions for New Horizons. Astrophys. J. Lett. (submitted,
available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.7778).
24
|
1610.07679 | 1 | 1610 | 2016-10-24T23:31:15 | Jupiter's Phase Variations from Cassini: a testbed for future direct-imaging missions | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | We present phase curves of Jupiter from 0-140 degrees as measured in multiple optical bandpasses by Cassini/ISS during the Millennium flyby of Jupiter in late 2000 to early 2001. Phase curves are of interest for studying the energy balance of Jupiter and understanding the scattering behavior of Jupiter as an exoplanet analog. We find that Jupiter is significantly darker at partial phases than an idealized Lambertian planet by roughly 25% and is not well fit by Jupiter-like exoplanet atmospheric models across all wavelengths. We provide analytic fits to Jupiter's phase function in several Cassini/ISS imaging filter bandpasses. In addition, these observations show that Jupiter's color is more variable with phase angle than predicted by models. Therefore, the color of even a near Jupiter-twin planet observed at a partial phase cannot be assumed to be comparable to that of Jupiter at full phase. We discuss how WFIRST and other future direct-imaging missions can enhance the study of cool giants. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | Draft version October 26, 2016
Preprint typeset using LATEX style AASTeX6 v. 1.0
6
1
0
2
t
c
O
4
2
.
]
P
E
h
p
-
o
r
t
s
a
[
1
v
9
7
6
7
0
.
0
1
6
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
JUPITER'S PHASE VARIATIONS FROM CASSINI: A TESTBED FOR FUTURE
DIRECT-IMAGING MISSIONS
L. C. Mayorga1, J. Jackiewicz
Department of Astronomy, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003-8001, USA
K. Rages
SETI Institute, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA
R. A. West
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
B. Knowles
CICLOPS/Space Science Institute, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
N. Lewis
Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
and
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
2
Mayorga, L. C. et al.
M. S. Marley
NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
1NSF GRFP Fellow
ABSTRACT
We present empirical phase curves of Jupiter from ∼ 0 − 140 degrees as measured in
multiple optical bandpasses by Cassini/ISS during the Millennium flyby of Jupiter in
late 2000 to early 2001. Phase curves are of interest for studying the energy balance of
Jupiter and understanding the scattering behavior of Jupiter as an exoplanet analog.
We find that Jupiter is significantly darker at partial phases than an idealized Lamber-
tian planet by roughly 25% and is not well fit by Jupiter-like exoplanet atmospheric
models across all wavelengths. We provide analytic fits to Jupiter's phase function
in several Cassini/ISS imaging filter bandpasses. In addition, these observations show
that Jupiter's color is more variable with phase angle than predicted by models. There-
fore, the color of even a near Jupiter-twin planet observed at a partial phase cannot be
assumed to be comparable to that of Jupiter at full phase. We discuss how WFIRST
and other future direct-imaging missions can enhance the study of cool giants.
1. INTRODUCTION
The ratio of the total energy scattered by a planet to that incident upon the planet, or the Bond
albedo, defines its external energy budget. Along with internal heat flow, this influences. a planet's
atmospheric temperature, controls its evolution through time, and defines its detectability as a func-
tion of wavelength. A more reflective atmosphere allows a planet to cool more quickly than a darker,
Jupiter's Empirical Phase Curve
3
more absorptive atmosphere. Complete measurements of the reflectivity of the planet require obser-
vations of the light from the planet relative to the light from the star at all wavelengths at all phase
angles, α, the angle formed between the star, planet, and Earth. The variation of reflectivity at a
given wavelength as a function of phase angle is known as the phase curve and is defined as follows:
Fp(λ, α)
F⊙(λ)
d (cid:19)2
= Ag(λ)(cid:18)Rp
Φ(λ, α),
(1)
where Ag(λ) is the monochromatic geometric albedo defined at α = 0◦, Fp(λ, α) is the monochromatic
planet flux observed at phase angle, α, F⊙(λ) is the monochromatic incident solar flux, Rp is the
planet's radius, d is the planet-star separation, and Φ(λ, α) is the planet's phase function at angle α,
not to be confused with particle scattering phase functions.
The simplest model planetary phase function treats planets as Lambertian reflectors where the
reflected intensity is described by
Φ(α) =
sin(α) + (π − α) cos(α)
π
.
(2)
Other phase functions are possible, including those which arise from isotropic or Rayleigh scattering
(e.g. Dlugach & Yanovitskij (1974); Greco & Burrows (2015)) or a combination of these and non-
isotropic Mie scatterers (Cahoy et al. 2010). From the phase function, we can calculate the phase
integral,
q(λ) = 2Z π
0
Φ(λ, α) sin(α)dα,
(3)
which leads to the fraction of light reflected at all angles known as the spherical albedo, As(λ) =
q(λ)Ag(λ). From this the full Bond albedo, a measure of the amount of light reflected at all angles
and all wavelengths, can be computed as,
For a given internal heat flow and under the assumption of thermal equilibrium, the effective tem-
0 As(λ)F⊙(λ)dλ
0 F⊙(λ)dλ
AB = R ∞
R ∞
.
(4)
4
Mayorga, L. C. et al.
perature of a planet can be estimated, allowing major cloud constituents and atmospheric structure
to be modeled. Evolution models can then constrain the cooling history.
While these concepts are familiar in planetary sciences, they have been fruitfully applied to exo-
planet science as well. As reviewed by Parmentier et al. (2016), measurements of the phase curves
of transiting planets have been used to create atmospheric brightness maps (e.g. Cowan & Agol
(2008) and Demory et al. (2013)).
Recent phase curve observations have indicated that plan-
ets have variations in cloud coverage (Webber et al. 2015; Majeau et al. 2012; Demory et al. 2013;
Parmentier et al. 2016; Sing et al. 2016) and deviate from the simple Lambertian assumption.
In
the future, planned space telescopes, such as WFIRST, aim to directly image extrasolar planets in
reflected light. The interpretation of such observations will require an understanding of their phase
curves (e.g. Cahoy et al. 2010; Greco & Burrows 2015) in order to interpret cloud properties and the
abundance of various absorbers (e.g., Nayak et al., submitted).
Fortunately, Solar System giant planets are generally well characterized and offer a point of com-
parison to future exoplanet observations. However, studies of the outer Solar System planets are
complicated by observational limitations. Since the Earth is interior to the giant planets in the
Solar System, only phase angles . 12◦ are visible to us from the ground for Jupiter (Gussow 1929;
Guthnick 1920, 1918; Muller 1893; Irvine et al. 1968), and even more restricted phase angles are
available for the more distant ice giants. Observations of full phase curves for the outer planets
requires space-craft observations, e.g., Pollack et al. (1986). The most notable ground-based work
(Karkoschka 1994, 1998) was able to obtain albedo spectra for all the giant planets at low phase
angles. These studies have become the basis for many exoplanet analyses. In particular, studies of
Jupiter are valuable as both a planet in our Solar System and an exoplanet analog.
In addition to their role in the interpretation of future observations, phase curves also play a role
in mission modeling and observation planning. The brightness of planets as a function of phase is
Jupiter's Empirical Phase Curve
5
an important input parameter to simulations of exoplanet searches by direct imaging and observa-
tion planning for known planets detected by other means. While it has been known since the early
20th century that Jupiter is not Lambertian, only recently have non-Lambertian phase curves been
considered in the exoplanet arena. To aid in such efforts here we seek to provide a testbed specif-
ically for giant-planet characterization and searches with direct-imaging techniques. Beyond these
empirical phase curves, the literature of the characterization of giant planets, including such works
as Tomasko et al. (1978) and Smith & Tomasko (1984), will undoubtedly be helpful for exoplanet
direct imaging science.
The need to classify the type of object being observed has led astronomers to often turn to color.
Color-color diagrams have been discussed as a method of determining surface properties of terrestrial-
type planets (Hegde & Kaltenegger 2013). Also, the color differences between objects have opened a
possibility for detecting exomoons through spectroastrometric observations (Agol et al. 2015) and can
be used to mitigate the contamination from background objects (Exo-S Final Report). In particular,
Cahoy et al. (2010) discuss the use of color-color diagrams to help distinguish between Neptune-like
and Jupiter-like exoplanets. In stellar astronomy, the (U −B), (B −V ) colors have a long history. The
(U − B) index roughly measures the height of the Balmer jump and has been shown to be sensitive to
both surface gravity and effective temperature, with further complications in interpretation arising
from a sensitivity to metallicity. The (B −V ) index is sensitive to the slope of the Paschen continuum
and is correlated with the effective temperature of the star. The choice of photometric system has
since somewhat evolved to more precisely measure stellar features.
From the combination of spectra compiled by Karkoschka (1994, 1998), Sing et al. (2016), and
modelling (e.g., ?Sudarsky et al. 2000; Cahoy et al. 2010), we can see that there are several notable
features that would help differentiate between various classes of gas giant exoplanets. In general the
blue end slope is a product of Rayleigh scattering by gas and hazes. Into the red and near-infrared
6
Mayorga, L. C. et al.
are spectral features of methane, ammonia, water, and alkali metals. Differences among solar system
giants are primarily attributable to variations in gravity, cloud properties, and methane abundance.
The appropriate selection of color indices for best identifying giant planets is relevant to instrument
filter selection and mission planning for direct imaging campaigns. For example among all the
combinations of Johnson-Morgan/Cousins (JC) filters, Cahoy et al. (2010) found that the (B − V ),
(R − I) and (B − V ), (V − I) filter pairs showed the greatest spread between planet types when
considering how color evolves with phase angle. To test the veracity of these exoplanet models for the
Jupiter-like planet case we require space-based observations across many phase angles and multiple
bandpasses.
Prior to the recent arrival of the Juno Spacecraft to Jupiter, the latest full-disk imaging of Jupiter
came in 2000, in a flyby of the planet by Cassini dubbed the "Millennium" flyby. Cassini was en
route to orbit around Saturn and carried a suite of instruments designed to study the atmospheres of
Saturn and Titan, the particles in the rings, and more (Porco 2003). The flyby provided thousands
of full-disk images of Jupiter in a variety of filters. An in depth explanation of the cameras and filters
on the Imaging Science Subsystem (ISS) can be found in Porco et al. (2004) and is briefly discussed
in SECTION 2.
Previous attempts to measure Jupiter's phase curves used data from Voyager (Hanel et al. 1981)
and Pioneer 10 and 11 (Tomasko et al. 1978; Smith & Tomasko 1984), but they had either limited
phase coverage, wavelength coverage, or were lacking in full-disk measurements at all phases, which
are most relevant to direct-imaging studies of exoplanets. Cassini/ISS data has already provided
information about the atmospheric properties of Jupiter (Zhang et al. 2013; Sato et al. 2013), but
previous studies have been limited to the Narrow Angle Camera (NAC), one of the two components of
the ISS, in concert with older space-based or ground-based observations (Dyudina et al. 2005, 2016).
Future exoplanet missions have prioritized atmospheric characterization via direct-imaging. The
Jupiter's Empirical Phase Curve
7
Wide-Field InfraRed Survey Telescope (WFIRST) was identified as the top priority space mission
in the 2010 "New Worlds, New Horizons" decadal survey. Its current design (Spergel et al. 2015)
features a coronagraph instrument (CGI) with an inner working angle of ∼ 0.1 arcseconds. The
CGI will enable WFIRST to directly image the light from exoplanets at moderate phase angles near
quadrature. The design features imaging capabilities in visible wavelengths (430–970 nm) with detec-
tion limitations reaching unprecedented planet/star contrast ratios (see Figure 2-44 in Spergel et al.
2015).
Preliminary target lists, sourced from planets detected through the radial-velocity measurements,
demonstrate that WFIRST's most promising targets will be Jupiter-mass planets with semi-major
axes of only a couple AU (Table 2-7 in Spergel et al. 2015). These planets maintain high contrast
ratios due to their size and proximity to their host stars without being within the inner working
angle. In preparation for the analysis of these
systems, it is critical that we gain an understanding
of how Jupiter-like planets scatter light as function of phase angle because they cannot be directly
imaged at 0◦ phase. The Cassini/ISS instrument shares the same wavelength regime and has provided
nearly full phase angle coverage of Jupiter and is therefore perfectly poised to provide observations
of Jupiter of the type WFIRST will conduct on giant exoplanets.
We present here an analysis of the images from both ISS cameras, the Narrow Angle and Wide Angle
Camera (NAC and WAC), in six filters ranging from roughly 400–1000 nm and spanning phase angles
from about 0–140 degrees. In SECTION 2 we present our data, the selection process (Section 2.1),
the reduction software (Section 2.2), and photometric analysis process (Section 2.3, Section 2.4). In
SECTION 3 we present the phase functions of Jupiter. We discuss our results and implications for
observations and model performance in SECTION 4 while making predictions for WFIRST. We close
in SECTION 5 with a summary of our results and preparations for future missions.
8
Mayorga, L. C. et al.
i
i
n
o
s
s
m
s
n
a
r
T
d
e
z
i
l
a
m
r
o
N
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
VIO
BL1
GRN
RED
CB2
CB3
K1998
C+2010
y
t
i
v
i
t
c
e
l
f
e
R
r
e
t
i
p
u
J
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
400
400
400
600
600
600
Wavelength (nm)
800
800
800
1000
1000
1000
Figure 1. The filter transmission curves for the WAC filters used in this study. Overplotted are the data
from Karkoschka (1998) taken in 1995 at a phase angle of 6.8◦ and the Cahoy et al. (2010) model of a
Jupiter-like planet at a phase angle of 0◦ degrees with no photochemical hazes.
2. DATA AND REDUCTION
Cassini/ISS took almost 23,000 images of Jupiter during the Millennium flyby spanning from Oc-
tober, 2000 to March, 2001. Cassini imaged Jupiter with both the WAC and the NAC, with fields of
view of 3.5◦ and 0.35◦, respectively (Porco et al. 2004). The two cameras each have two filter wheels
that are designed to move independently. The WAC has 9 filters on each wheel for a total of 18
filters. The NAC has 12 filters on each wheel for a total of 24 filters. Roughly half of the NAC filters
are duplicated on the WAC, however the bandpasses are shifted a few nm because of the differing
spectral transmissions of the camera optics (the optical train of the WAC is a Voyager flight spare),
(Porco et al. 2004). These 15 common filters span from 400–1000 nm in wavelength and six of the
WAC filters' transmission curves are shown in Figure 1.
Jupiter's Empirical Phase Curve
9
2.1. Data Selection
The images vary in resolution and orientation during the course of the flyby. The requirement
for this study is that Jupiter be contained entirely within an image.
This requirement resulted
in the poor sampling of phase angles in the 20–50 degree range (see Figure 2), where not only was
Jupiter too large, but the spacecraft also made other observations. During the photometry process,
we ensure that Jupiter's disk does not fall off the edge of the field-of-view due to Jupiter being too
close or from specific pointings.
Given the need for short exposures to prevent smearing during flybys, the most common configura-
tion is a clear filter in combination with a filter from the other wheel. For the WAC specifically, the
CL1 filter was designed to improve focus when combined with the filters of the second wheel. Sharp
focus is difficult to achieve on the WAC with any other combination and renders most two-filter
combinations useless (Porco et al. 2004). Maximizing the phase coverage of the data results in the
bulk of the images being a combination of a clear filter and a common filter that is present on the
WAC's second wheel.
Of the 15 similar filters on the WAC and NAC, only data observed with six of them in combination
with a clear filter are considered in this study (the six shown in Figure 1). We discarded the two
methane-band filters (MT), the four IR filters, an IR polarization filter, and a Hydrogen alpha filter.
These 8 filters do not have sufficient phase coverage for our purposes. We opted to include the VIO
filter, despite it not being a common filter, because it does have sufficient phase coverage. Due to
the methods by which the data were transmitted to Earth, those images that were compressed in a
lossy fashion were also discarded as they are not of photometric quality.
This selection process results in nearly 10,000 images being selected and downloaded from the
Planetary Data System (PDS) Rings Node in the raw format. Some additional images were removed
10
103
103
102
102
101
101
s
e
g
a
m
I
f
o
r
e
b
m
u
N
100
100
0
0
Mayorga, L. C. et al.
VIO
BL1
GRN
RED
CB2
CB3
45
45
90
90
Phase Angle (°)
)
m
k
6
0
1
(
e
c
n
a
t
s
D
i
60
40
20
0
-20
-40
-60
135
135
WAC
NAC
Sun
135
120
105
90
75
60
45
30
15
0
)
°
(
l
e
g
n
A
e
s
a
h
P
-20
0
20
Distance (106 km)
Figure 2. The phase angle coverage available in a selection of filters for both the WAC and NAC cameras.
Left: The number of images that fit our selection criteria is shown for 15◦ bins in phase angle. The gap in
coverage from 20 to 50 degrees is due to Jupiter encompassing an area too large to be contained in a single
image as well as the spacecraft targeting for other observations. Right: The position of Cassini around
Jupiter during the flyby in the J2000 (x, y) plane color-coded with phase angle in 15◦ bins. For clarity, the
NAC data (squares) are offset from the WAC data (circles) by −5 million km in x..
from our sample due to pixel saturation, poor targeting of Jupiter, etc. The final sample is roughly
6600 images. The resulting number of images as a function of phase angle for the six filters is shown
in Figure 2. The total number of images and effective wavelengths of the filters use in this study,
computed from using the full system transmission function convolved with a solar spectrum, are
shown in Table 1.
2.2. Cassini ISS CALibration (CISSCAL) image reduction
CISSCAL is the Cassini/ISS image reduction pipeline. CISSCALv3.6 was the latest version at the
onset of our study and we followed the steps outlined by West et al. (2010) and the ISS Data User
Jupiter's Empirical Phase Curve
11
Table 1. Number of images in each filter used in this study.
Filter
WAC
NAC
λeff (nm) # of images λeff (nm) # of images
VIO
BL1
GRN
RED
CB2
CB3
Total
420
463
568
647
752
939
· · ·
658
201
701
622
680
421
3283
· · ·
455
569
649
750
938
· · ·
· · ·
841
839
556
837
289
3362
Guide1 to fully reduce the data. To summarize, CISSCAL removes bias, dark current, and a 2 Hz
noise source found in all ISS data. It applies flatfielding, nonlinearity, and antiblooming corrections
and accounts for exposure times, quantum efficiency, and uneven bit weighting. The images resulting
from this process are provided in photon flux units alone or normalized by the solar flux ( I
F). The
latter case will be denoted as the reflectivity.
Reduced images still vary in resolution, orientation, and presence or absence of moons and their
shadows on Jupiter's disk. A sample of four fully reduced green (GRN) WAC images from crescent
to full phase that have been properly derotated, aligned, and cropped is shown in Figure 3.
2.3. Additional data processing
1 pds-rings.seti.org/cassini/iss/ISS Data User Guide 120703.pdf
12
Mayorga, L. C. et al.
Figure 3. Example images of Jupiter taken in the GRN filter after CISSCAL reduction. The flyby allowed
Cassini to image Jupiter at various phases shown here from left to right at approximately 0, 50, 90, and 125
degrees. Note that the 90 degree image contains the shadow of the moon Io.
This study only concerns Jupiter's reflected and scattered light and the fully reduced images still
require removal of some wayward light sources. These sources can be cosmic rays, background stars,
and moonlight. We discuss lost light which has not made it to the detector due to PSF broadening.
It is also necessary to adjust for the non-equatorial viewing angle increasing Jupiter's disk area.
The corrections for lost light and cosmic rays are described by West et al. (2010). We chose to
forgo the lost light correction partially due to analysis in West et al. (2010), who note it made less
than a 1% difference in the majority of filters. In addition, the PSFs were derived from observations
of stars in early flight stages. Due to the method that the PSFs were created, it is suspected that
the wings of the extended PSFs are overestimated and require attenuation from their current values.
Our analysis of the Jupiter images, as West et al. (2010) show for Enceladus, gives us confidence that
indeed the lost light fraction can be ignored at the 1% level.
Jupiter's apparent size and the position of its moons vary on an image-to-image basis. We required
navigation and targeting information for each image. We used SPICE (Spacecraft Planet Instrument
Camera matrix Events), a program provided and maintained by JPL and acquired from the PDS
Navigation Node. The purpose of SPICE is to track observation geometry and events leading to
determining the following: (1) spacecraft location and orientation; (2) target location, shape, and size;
(3) events on the spacecraft or the ground that might affect the interpretation of science observations
Jupiter's Empirical Phase Curve
13
(SPICE overview tutorial 3). SPICE can quickly determine the 3-dimensional position of Jupiter
and its moons, and compute the location of moon shadows on Jupiter's disk from any perspective.
Visual inspection of the images reveals that we often see Io or its shadow crossing Jupiter's disk.
The targeting information shows that one of the Galilean satellites and several smaller moons like
Adrastea and Metis are often present (see Io's shadow in Figure 3 in the 90◦ phase angle image).
SPICE, in combination with the image labels, is able to provide us with the necessary position
information to identify moons and their shadows that impact the light the cameras receive from
Jupiter. At most their presence could cause a . 0.15% difference in the measured flux, (assuming
Jupiter is 100% reflective and the moons are 0% reflective). In the spirit of what will be done with
WFIRST, we have chosen to make analogous observations by not removing or correcting for the
moons and their shadows in the image, since direct-imaging missions will not be able to resolve such
details.
2.4. Photometry
We briefly discuss how the brightness of Jupiter (relative to the incoming solar flux) in each filter
is obtained from the fully-reduced images. To remove leftover background features, such as stellar
and lunar sources outside of Jupiter's disk, we first set pixel values that are below a threshold, that
is image and filter dependent, to zero. We then determine the location of Jupiter in the image and
remove any sources of light that remain outside of Jupiter's disk. What remains is Jupiter's light,
some moonlight from moons in front of Jupiter, and the surrounding glow from scattered light. The
images are then summed over and normalized by the apparent area of Jupiter to create a phase curve
according to
Fp(λ, α)
F⊙(λ, α)
= PN
i
AJ
I
F i
,
(5)
14
Mayorga, L. C. et al.
where I
F is the solar-flux normalized brightness of Jupiter in a given bandpass at a given phase angle,
AJ is the apparent area of Jupiter in pixels, and the sum runs over all N pixels in an image.
Note that the phase curve formulation already accounts for Cassini's distance from Jupiter due
to how AJ is computed. We chose to properly compute AJ , instead of removing a distance factor
from I
F , because Jupiter is an oblate spheroid. Its apparent shape and area changes from image to
image. SPICE is able to compute the location of the apparent limb of Jupiter given Cassini's and
Jupiter's 3-dimensional location in space. From this we determine the pixel location of the limb and
compute the apparent area AJ in each of our images. Each image has a known phase angle and the
photometry of all images produces a phase curve. Normalizing the phase curve to unity at zero phase
produces a phase function.
The reflectivity values for the NAC and the WAC are offset from each other in each filter. This is
likely due to a contamination event and subsequent de-contamination cycle that occurred between
the Jupiter and Saturn encounters that changed the calibration. To derive the normalized phase
functions, which make use of both datasets, the NAC reflectivity values are first scaled to the WAC
reflectivity values. Then, the combined phase curve is fit by a low order polynomial to approximate
a 0◦ phase value and normalized to unity. This is easily done for all but the RED filter where there
is no phase coverage overlap between the NAC and the WAC values. We instead found the closest
NAC and WAC phase angle pair, those closest to 135◦ phase, and scaled based on those. The closest
WAC data point is at a lower phase angle (∼ 120◦) while the closest NAC data point is at a higher
phase angle (∼ 137◦). The GRN and CB2 filters show that between 120◦ and 137◦ the reflectivity
of Jupiter decreased 63% and 65%, respectively. Thus we scaled the NAC RED reflectivity values to
match a 65% falloff.
3. RESULTS
y
t
i
v
i
t
c
e
l
f
e
R
y
r
a
r
t
i
b
r
A
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
VIO
GRN
RED
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
60
60
Jupiter's Empirical Phase Curve
15
20
16
)
°
(
l
12
e
g
n
A
e
s
a
h
P
8
4
30
30
20
20
CB2
CB3
50
50
40
40
Target Distance (106 km)
Figure 4. The measured reflectivity of Jupiter in 5 of the WAC filters as a function of distance during the
period of approach. The deviation seen in the WAC GRN and RED filters is not present in any of the other
filters with concurrent imaging. The curves are offset for clarity.
During Cassini's approach to Jupiter, the measured flux by the WAC shows peculiar deviations
only in certain filters at distances of about 30–35 million km, corresponding to phases 12–16 degrees.
Figure 4 shows 5 of the WAC filters during the period of interest. Although there is also higher
dispersion in the data at low phase angles, the deviation is markedly present in the GRN and RED
filters, but not present concurrently in the VIO, CB2 or CB3 filters. BL1 images were not taken
during this time period with sufficient frequency to note such a trend. The NAC does not have images
closer than 40 million km and thus does not cover the period of most deviation. Due to Jupiter's
brightness in both the GRN and RED filters, these filters have the shortest exposure duration of
5 ms throughout the entire encounter with Jupiter. Inconsistencies in the shutter speed may be the
source of these deviations.
To compare with the uniformly cloudy Jupiter-like exoplanet from Cahoy et al. (2010), we first
16
Mayorga, L. C. et al.
must generate the phase curves. The Cahoy et al. (2010) models generated albedo spectra at a 10◦
phase increments. We filter-integrated each albedo spectrum and then normalized to unity at zero
phase. The resulting phase functions from the Cassini/ISS and Cahoy et al. (2010) are shown in
Figure 5. Also shown are the best fit polynomials to the Cassini/ISS data and a sample of phase
functions for a cloud-free atmosphere representing a range of Rayleigh single scattering albedos.
The phase coverage of NAC images is significantly less than that covered by WAC images, but it
does extend coverage into high phase angles. The gap in data in the 20–45 degree phase range, when
Cassini was quite close to Jupiter, is caused by the limitations we imposed on Jupiter's apparent size.
The GRN and RED images from the WAC are quite noisy due to the probable shutter instabilities.
The other WAC filters and all the NAC filters do not exhibit the same behavior and as a result
are much cleaner. However, the VIO images from the WAC show a small bump around 18◦ phase,
evident in Figure 5, which is not corroborated by any other filters. CB2 images appear to be the
cleanest and have the best phase coverage.
We fit the phase functions with a 5th-order polynomial letting all coefficients be free parameters
and restricting the function to reach 0 at 180◦ phase. We also tried a fit by setting the coefficient
of the linear term to zero, which fixes the first-derivative to zero at 0◦ phase. The former function
yields a better overall fit as the data fall off steeply at low phase angles. Given the phase coverage
of the data, the fits break down and are untrustworthy beyond ∼ 130◦ due to the lack of data to
constrain that region. The table of coefficients of the best fit 5th order polynomial for each filter is
shown in Table 2, where x = α/180. We show the coefficients to the third decimal place to ensure
that in the range of 0–135 degrees (x =0–0.75), where the fits are trustworthy, the computed curve
is within 1% of the machine precision result.
We opted to use a 5th order polynomial because it minimized the standard deviation of the residuals
in each filter (the average standard deviation is 0.003). With increasing order, the average standard
Jupiter's Empirical Phase Curve
17
Table 2. Coefficients of the polynomial fits.
Filters
[ ]
+
[ ] x +
[ ] x2 +
[ ] x3 +
[ ] x4 +
[ ] x5
VIO
1.000
-1.815
0.940
-2.399
4.990
-2.715
BL1
1.000
-1.311
-2.382
5.893
-4.046
0.846
GRN 1.000
-1.507
-0.363
-0.062
2.809
-1.876
RED
1.000
-0.882
-3.923
8.142
-5.776
1.439
CB2
1.000
-1.121
-1.720
1.776
1.757
-1.691
CB3
1.000
-0.413
-6.932
11.388
-3.261
-1.783
deviation is reduced, but individual standard deviations begin to fluctuate. In particular, the lack of
constraints in the data for the CB3 filter lead to poorly behaved fits for polynomials greater than 5th
order. Limitations in the available dataset translate into some poorer quality polynomial fits. The
VIO filter has no data past 120◦ leading to a poor fit in that region. In addition, the CB3 filter has
insufficient mid and high phase angle coverage leading to poor constraints on the fit.
Furthermore, work by Karalidi et al. (2015) with the Hubble Space Telescope has shown that
Jupiter varies by a couple percent in brightness over the course of a rotation and the amplitude
of this variation fluctuates with time and the evolution of cloud features. We have presented here
only a snapshot of Jupiter in time and fully expect that Jupiter will likewise vary when observed at
other phase angles. In addition, observations from higher inclinations will detect smaller phase curve
amplitudes and may miss any backscattering anomalies.
As seen in Figure 5, the observed phase curves depart from a purely Lambertian phase function and
qualitatively more closely resemble the combined Rayleigh and particle scattering phase functions
predicted by models (Cahoy et al. 2010; Greco & Burrows 2015). In general the planet is darker at
18
Mayorga, L. C. et al.
all wavelengths at phase angles below about 90 degrees and brighter than Lambertian at higher phase
angles. At phase angles above 45 degrees, the Cassini data generally have a shallower slope than a
Lambertian phase function. In addition at very low phase angles there is an uncharacteristic steep
slope to the phase curve, known as the cusp effect, that has been readily apparent since the first
ground-based observations were conducted at the turn of the 20th Century (Gussow 1929; Guthnick
1920, 1918; Muller 1893; Irvine et al. 1968) and most recently was discussed in Dyudina et al. (2016)
as being caused by large cloud particles sharpening the backscattering peak. Dyudina et al. (2016)
employ models incorporating Henyey-Greenstein functions to study this effect in detail. The phase
function resulting from their modeling is shown in the CB3 panel of Figure 5 in dark gray.
We also compared our phase functions with model representations. The first comparison is with the
phase function of the 3x solar metallicity Jupiter-like planet at a separation of 5 AU from Cahoy et al.
(2010). This model2 is computed to provide an approximate "Jupiter-like" albedo spectrum although
it is missing the atmospheric photochemistry that would more accurately reproduce the hazes and
chromophores that would lower the measured albedo in the blue and UV to match that of Jupiter
(see again Figure 1).
The second comparison is with several phase functions produced through a vector Rayleigh-
scattering treatment by Madhusudhan & Burrows (2012). Rayleigh scattering is the dominant
contribution to scattered light in a cloud-free atmosphere (Madhusudhan & Burrows 2012). The
models have a range of scattering albedos, ω, given by
ω =
σscat
σscat + σabs
,
(6)
where σscat and σabs denotes the single-scattering and absorption cross sections, respectively. For a
perfectly Rayleigh-scattering atmosphere, ω = 1. A more absorptive atmosphere can be modeled
2 https://wfirst.ipac.caltech.edu/sims/Exoplanet Albedos.html
Jupiter's Empirical Phase Curve
19
1.00
0.93
0.86
0.80
0
1.00
0.93
0.86
0.80
0
1.00
0.95
0.90
0.85
0
5
10
15
20
5
10
15
20
5
10
15
20
BL1
RED
CB3
1.00
0.94
0.88
0.82
0
1.000
0.947
0.894
0.841
0
1.00
0.96
0.92
0.88
0
5
10
15
20
5
10
15
20
5
10
15
20
0
0
Phase Angle (°)
Cahoy+2010
45
90
135
ω = 0.1
ω = 0.5
ω = 0.9
n
o
i
t
c
n
u
F
e
s
a
h
P
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0
0
VIO
GRN
CB2
45
90
135
WAC
NAC
Order 5 poly
Lambertian
Figure 5. The phase functions for all of the filters in our study. From the top left to the bottom right we
show: VIO, BL1, GRN, RED, CB2, and CB3. The black circles are from the WAC and the gray squares
are from the NAC. We overplot a 5th order polynomial fit for each filter in blue, a Lambertian phase
function in red, the phase function derived from filter integrating Cahoy et al. (2010) in tan, and several
Madhusudhan & Burrows (2012) vector Rayleigh phase functions for a variety of scattering albedos, ω. The
Dyudina et al. (2016) phase function for CB3 is overplotted in that panel in dark gray for comparison. The
inset plots highlight the region near full phase and demonstrate the steep slope we refer to as the cusp effect.
with smaller values of ω. The scattering albedo is highly dependent on wavelength and atmospheric
conditions such as temperature, pressure, and composition. Thus we have selected a sub-sample of
the full range of potential ω values for comparison.
4. DISCUSSION
20
Mayorga, L. C. et al.
WFIRST will be observing planets which are well separated from their host stars. For edge-
on systems, the planet will be observed at phase angles somewhere between 40 and 130 degrees
depending on the orientation of the orbit and the limitations of the coronographs inner working
angle. For systems closer to face-on, this range shrinks down towards ∼ 90◦. The need to understand
scattering from the planetary atmosphere in these near-quadrature regimes is clear.
The Cassini data indicate that Jupiter's true phase function is not perfectly reproduced by any
current model prediction. Indeed it differs from the model phase functions of Cahoy et al. (2010);
Madhusudhan & Burrows (2012); Greco & Burrows (2015). This is not unexpected since these mod-
els all assume idealized uniform, scattering atmospheres.
In reality, we know Jupiter is more
complex. The Cahoy et al. (2010) phase functions of a 3x solar metallicity Jupiter-like exoplanet
through the Cassini filter set are shown together in Figure 6 along with the residuals when compar-
ing the model to the data. The models lack a cusp effect and demonstrate a steep slope in filters
and there is a small evolution from shorter to longer wavelengths where the bluer wavelengths have
a slightly shallower fall off with phase angle before falling off more quickly at phase angles beyond
150◦. Despite the Cahoy et al. (2010) assumptions, the residuals show that their models do a rea-
sonable job at matching Jupiter's phase function especially in the reddest Cassini/ISS filters where
the presence of haze is minimal and clouds are relatively uniform.
The polynomial fits to the Cassini data are shown all together in the upper panel of Figure 7
in comparison with a Lambertian phase function.
In the Cassini data, CB3 shows the weakest
demonstration of the cusp effect and yet, as demonstrated by Dyudina et al. (2016), still does not
align well with any of the models. The mid phase angle slope of the data is shallower than any of
the models. The gray shaded region from 60–120 degrees highlights the phase angles where WFIRST
observations will most often occur. The gray dashed vertical line indicates where our fits become
unconstrained by the data and any behavior beyond this point should be treated with caution.
1.0
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
-0.1
0
n
o
i
t
c
n
u
F
e
s
a
h
P
s
l
a
u
d
i
s
e
R
Jupiter's Empirical Phase Curve
21
VIO
BL1
GRN
RED
CB2
CB3
50
100
Phase Angle (°)
150
Figure 6. Upper: The Cahoy et al. (2010) phase functions of a 3x solar metallicity Jupiter with a separation
of 5 AU from a solar-like star as seen through the Cassini filter set. Lower: The residuals between the data
and each model.
For future direct-imaging missions, the desire for a bright planet that is still widely separated
provides constraints on what the optimal phase angles of observations might be. The planet/star
contrast ratios for the WFIRST candidate systems are computed by Spergel et al. (2015) at 60◦.
Figure 7 shows that in the near-quadrature regime Jupiter-like planets are much darker than predicted
by the Lambertian assumption. The middle panel of Figure 7 shows the percent error (100Y −X/X,
where Y is the predicted value and X is the actual value at each phase) between the Lambertian
phase function and Jupiter in each filter. The difference is largest at 60◦ phase where the Lambertian
22
Mayorga, L. C. et al.
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
90
90
60
60
30
30
0
0
0.04
0.02
0.00
-0.02
-0.04
0
n
o
i
t
c
n
u
F
e
s
a
h
P
r
o
r
r
E
t
n
e
c
r
e
P
s
l
a
u
d
i
s
e
R
Lambertian
VIO
BL1
GRN
RED
CB2
CB3
D2016 CB3
50
100
Phase Angle (°)
150
Figure 7. Upper: The 5th order polynomial fits to each phase function. The shaded region indicates the
phase-angles most likely to be observed by direct-imaging missions, 60–120 degrees. Note that the fits are
unconstrained by the data past ∼ 130◦ phase as marked by the vertical dashed line. Middle: The percent
difference between the Lambertian phase function and each filter. Lower: The residuals between the data
and each fit.
Jupiter's Empirical Phase Curve
23
overpredicts Jupiter's brightness by on average roughly 25%. Meanwhile, observations of Jupiter only
near 110◦ phase would result in the erroneous conclusion that Jupiter is consistent with a Lambertian
sphere. The Lambertian assumption is a poor model of Jupiter-like exoplanets and further study of
the Solar System giants is needed.
Given the complexity of Jupiter's true phase curve, we briefly consider another Solar System planet,
Venus, which has a well studied atmosphere. Venus is interior to the orbit of the Earth and its
orbit has allowed for extensive ground- and space-based monitoring of its brightness through time.
Mallama et al. (2006) provide polynomial fit coefficients to Venus' phase curves which are valid from
∼6 to ∼165 degrees in the JC system. We computed the 0◦ phase angle point for normalization and
demonstrate the differences between the two planets in Figure 8. Although WFIRST will not be
able to observe Venus-like planets, the next generation of space-based telescopes may well be able
to. We note that like Jupiter, Venus' phase curve differs from that of a simple Lambertian and the
interpretation of observations of such worlds will likewise require sophisticated modeling such as that
of Robinson et al. (2010).
As discussed previously, there is some discussion over optimal color index choices. The desire
to measure the blue continuum slope and the strength of the redder lines indicates a color index
selection of (B − V ), (V − Z) or (V − I). Cahoy et al. (2010) preferred similar indices, (B − V ),
(R − I) and (B − V ), (V − I), and Hegde & Kaltenegger (2013) preferred (B − I), (B − V ). For
comparison purposes, we have explored this question using the Cassini/ISS filters with the closest
effective wavelengths, namely BL1 is representative of the B filter, GRN is V, RED is R, CB2 is I
and CB3 is Z.
To compute color, we use the polynomial fit functions scaled to align with Karkoschka (1998) albedo
values, PK, and compute them at 1 degree increments from 0–135 degrees. We then multiply by the
filter-integrated value of the solar reference spectrum at 5.2 AU that was previously divided out by
24
Mayorga, L. C. et al.
n
o
i
t
c
n
u
F
e
s
a
h
P
1.0
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0
0
J
V
BL1
GRN
RED
B
V
R
50
50
100
100
Phase Angle (°)
150
150
Figure 8. Comparison of phase functions for Venus and Jupiter. The Jupiter curves (solid) are from this
work, while those from Venus (dashed) are obtained from Mallama et al. (2006). The three filters for Jupiter
are the closest matching available to the JC system's BVR.
CISSCAL during the reduction process. The color indices are computed as shown in equation (7) for
two filters, f1 and f2.
f1 − f2 = −2.5 log(cid:18)PK,f1(α)Rλ F⊙(λ)Tf1(λ)dλ
PK,f2(α)Rλ F⊙(λ)Tf2(λ)dλ(cid:19)
(7)
The color-color diagrams as a function of phase angle are shown in Figure 9 with the colors of all
the giant planets as a reference. The colors of all the giant planets were computed from Karkoschka
(1998) and represent the colors of those planets at 6.8◦ for Jupiter, 5.7◦ phase for Saturn, and ∼ 0◦
Jupiter's Empirical Phase Curve
25
phase for Uranus and Neptune. For comparison, we have also computed the color of the 3x solar
metallicity Jupiter-like planet at a separation of 5 AU using the phase function from Cahoy et al.
(2010) also scaled to Karkoschka (1998) and those diagrams are plotted without phase information.
The 0◦ phase angle colors are not in perfect agreement with Cahoy et al. (2010), but are in the
correct region of color space. Cahoy et al. (2010) expressed concern with selecting color indices where
the planet types are well separated. Figure 9 demonstrates that the giant planets can occupy distinct
regions of color space.
Jupiter's color varies with phase angle. This variation is much larger than
predicted by the idealized model of Cahoy et al. (2010) ranging from ∼ 0.1 mag in (BL1 - GRN) up
to ∼ 0.5 mag in (GRN - CB3) assuming the model by Dyudina et al. (2016). A Jupiter-twin may fall
somewhere within this much larger range depending on the phase in which it is observed. This may
exacerbate the issue of using exoplanet colors as a method of distinguishing between planet types
and background objects.
The precise evolution of color with phase angle will vary based on filter selection. The Cahoy et al.
(2010) models show less variation in the Cassini/ISS photometric system than in the JC system and
the differences in color between the planets is also smaller. It is possible that the Cassini observations
in the JC system would result in Jupiter's color variations being proportionately larger.
The Cassini/ISS filters were specifically selected to target known features while the JC system was
an earlier evolution of a filter set intended for stellar classification. For future direct-imaging missions,
the filter set must also evolve to better allow classification of planets. In particular, observations will
most often be done at phase angles between 60 and 120 degrees (olive and lighter in Figure 9). The
variation in this regime ranges from ∼ 0.01 mag to ∼ 0.3 mag. The WFIRST/CGI filters will not
be in the JC system, but the filters listed in Spergel et al. (2015) have central wavelengths similar to
those of Cassini/ISS's RED, CB2, and MT3 filters . These filter choices are intended for measuring
the blue continuum slope and the effects of methane and given their similarities to the Cassini/ISS
26
N
R
G
-
1
L
B
N
R
G
-
1
L
B
0.2
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
0.2
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
Mayorga, L. C. et al.
-0.4
-0.2
RED-CB2
0.0
0.0
0.0
2
B
C
-
1
L
B
-0.5
-0.5
-1.0
-1.0
-1.5
-1.5
0.2
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
N
R
G
-
1
L
B
-0.9
-0.6
GRN-CB2
-0.3
Jupiter
Saturn
Uranus
135
120
105
)
°
(
l
e
g
n
A
e
s
a
h
P
90
75
60
45
30
15
0
-0.3
-0.3
0.0
0.0
BL1-GRN
0.3
0.3
-1.5
-1.0
GRN-CB3
Neptune
-0.5
Figure 9. Color-color diagrams for Jupiter as a function of phase angle for a variety of color indices. For
reference, the colored stars indicate the Karkoschka (1998) filter-integrated color at 6.8◦ phase for Jupiter
in red, 5.7◦ phase for Saturn in orange, ∼ 0◦ phase for Uranus in turquoise, and ∼ 0◦ phase for Neptune in
navy. The 3x solar metallicity Jupiter-like planet of Cahoy et al. (2010) is shown completely in red tracks
and is much less variable than Jupiter. For the panel including CB3, we also demonstrate the variation
assuming the Dyudina et al. (2016) model offset by +0.1 in BL1-GRN for clarity.
Jupiter's Empirical Phase Curve
27
filterset should be well suited to differentiating planets as long as appropriate care is given to measure
the phase variation over an adequate fraction of the planetary orbit.
5. CONCLUSIONS
We have presented a study of Jupiter's reflected light as seen by Cassini/ISS during the millennium
flyby in late 2000 to early 2001. We have analyzed the full-disk images of Jupiter from both cameras
in six filters spanning the range of wavelengths 400–1000 nm and phases from 0–140 degrees.
We find that Jupiter's phase function as observed in 2000 and 2001 is well reproduced by a 5th-
order polynomial whose coefficients are given in Table 2 for each Cassini/ISS filter. In general, the
brightness of Jupiter falls off more steeply near full illumination than previously predicted and is
significantly darker than Lambertian near quadrature and somewhat brighter than both a purely
Rayleigh scattering model and the Cahoy et al. (2010) prediction at high phase angles.
We find that Jupiter's color varies substantially with phase angle by as much as ∼ 0.8 mag across
all phase angles and as much as ∼ 0.3 mag in the 60–120 degree regime, well beyond that previously
predicted by (Cahoy et al. 2010). Although not demonstrated here, we expect, given the complexity
of planetary atmospheres, that such color changes are typical of many types of planets.
The variability that we observe in Jupiter's color as a function of phase, demonstrates that multi-
bandpass measurements would be required to fully characterize a given planet. The phase dependence
likely arises from the relative contributions to the scattered light from clouds and hazes at various
altitudes in the atmosphere and carries information about the vertical structure and composition of
the atmosphere that could not easily be extracted from a single observation.
We analyzed only six of the filters on Cassini/ISS and lack of phase coverage prevented the rest
from being included in this study. In particular, the methane filters, which lacked the requisite phase
coverage to be included in our study, but has been included in others (Dyudina et al. 2016), and the
28
Mayorga, L. C. et al.
polarization filters are of particular interest to the studies of planet color especially with respect to
WFIRST.
As the field of exoplanet science moves toward the direct-imaging of planets in reflected light, ob-
servations of solar system planets under similar viewing geometries and at similar wavelengths, as
presented here, will undoubtedly provide important context. While the new worlds will inevitably
present new surprises, viewing them in the context of solar system observations will provide a frame-
work for interpreting the unexpected.
The authors would like to thank Adam Burrows for providing the code to generate the Rayleigh
phase curves. K.R. and M.S.M thank the WFIRST Project Office for support of their participation
in this project. L.C.M would like to acknowledge support from the NSF GRFP. This material is
based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Pro-
gram under Grant No. DGE-1144458. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations
expressed in this material are those of the authors(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the
National Science Foundation.
Jupiter's Empirical Phase Curve
29
REFERENCES
Agol, E., Jansen, T., Lacy, B., Robinson, T. D., &
Meadows, V. 2015, ApJ, 812, 5
Cahoy, K. L., Marley, M. S., & Fortney, J. J. 2010,
ApJ, 724, 189
Cowan, N. B., & Agol, E. 2008, ApJ, 678, L129
Demory, B.-O., de Wit, J., Lewis, N., et al. 2013, ApJ,
776, L25
Dlugach, J., & Yanovitskij, E. 1974, Icarus, 22, 66
Dyudina, U., Zhang, X., Li, L., et al. 2016, ApJ, 822,
76
Dyudina, U. A., Sackett, P. D., Bayliss, D. D. R., et al.
2005, ApJ, 618, 973
Greco, J. P., & Burrows, A. 2015, ApJ, 808, 172
Gussow, M. 1929, Astron. Nachrichten, 237, 229
Guthnick, P. 1918, Astron. Nachrichten, 206, 157
-. 1920, Astron. Nachrichten, 212, 39
Hanel, R. a., Conrath, B. J., Herath, L. W., Kunde,
V. G., & Pirraglia, J. a. 1981, JGR, 86, 8705
Hegde, S., & Kaltenegger, L. 2013, AsBio, 13, 47
Irvine, W. M., Simon, T., Menzel, D. H., Pikoos, C., &
Young, A. T. 1968, AJ, 73, 807
Karalidi, T., Apai, D., Schneider, G., Hanson, J. R., &
Pasachoff, J. M. 2015, ApJ, 814, 65
Karkoschka, E. 1994, Icarus, 111, 174
-. 1998, Icarus, 133, 134
Madhusudhan, N., & Burrows, A. 2012, ApJ, 747, 25
Majeau, C., Agol, E., & Cowan, N. B. 2012, ApJ, 747,
L20
Mallama, A., Wang, D., & Howard, R. A. 2006, Icarus,
182, 10
Muller, G. 1893, Publ. des Astrophys. Obs. zu
Potsdam, 8, 193
Parmentier, V., Fortney, J. J., Showman, A. P., Morley,
C. V., & Marley, M. S. 2016, arXiv:1602.03088
Pollack, J. B., Rages, K., Baines, K. H., et al. 1986,
Porco, C. C. 2003, Science (80-. )., 299, 1541
Porco, C. C., West, R. a., Squyres, S., et al. 2004,
Robinson, T. D., Meadows, V. S., & Crisp, D. 2010,
Sato, T., Satoh, T., & Kasaba, Y. 2013, Icarus, 222,
Sing, D. K., Fortney, J. J., Nikolov, N., et al. 2016,
Icarus, 65, 442
SSrv, 115, 363
ApJ, 721, L67
100
Nature, 529, 59
Smith, P. H., & Tomasko, M. G. 1984, Icarus, 58, 35
Spergel, D., Gehrels, N., Baltay, C., et al. 2015,
Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics
Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015
Report, Tech. rep., arXiv:1503.03757
Sudarsky, D., Burrows, A., & Pinto, P. 2000, ApJ, 538,
Tomasko, M., West, R., & Castillo, N. 1978, Icarus, 33,
Webber, M. W., Lewis, N. K., Marley, M., et al. 2015,
West, R., Knowles, B., Birath, E., et al. 2010, P&SS,
Zhang, X., West, R., Banfield, D., & Yung, Y. 2013,
885
558
ApJ, 804, 94
58, 1475
Icarus, 226, 159
|
1904.09355 | 2 | 1904 | 2019-05-21T18:55:18 | Exoplanet Reflected Light Spectroscopy with PICASO | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | Here we present the first open-source radiative transfer model for computing the reflected light of exoplanets at any phase geometry, called PICASO: Planetary Intensity Code for Atmospheric Scattering Observations. This code, written in Python, has heritage from a decades old, well-known Fortran model used for several studies of planetary objects within the Solar System and beyond. We have adopted it to include several methodologies for computing both direct and diffuse scattering phase functions, and have added several updates including the ability to compute Raman scattering spectral features. Here we benchmark PICASO against two independent codes and discuss the degree to which the model is sensitive to a user's specification for various phase functions. Then, we conduct a full information content study of the model across a wide parameter space in temperature, cloud profile, SNR and resolving power. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | Draft version May 23, 2019
Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62
9
1
0
2
y
a
M
1
2
.
]
P
E
h
p
-
o
r
t
s
a
[
2
v
5
5
3
9
0
.
4
0
9
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
Exoplanet Reflected Light Spectroscopy with PICASO
Natasha E. Batalha,1 Mark S. Marley,2 Nikole K. Lewis,3 and Jonathan J. Fortney1
1Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of CaliforniaSanta Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
2NASA Ames Research Center, MS 245-3, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
3Department of Astronomy and Carl Sagan Institute, Cornell University, 122 Sciences Drive, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
(Accepted April 12, 2019)
Submitted to ApJ
ABSTRACT
Here we present the first open-source radiative transfer model for computing the reflected light of
exoplanets at any phase geometry, called PICASO: Planetary Intensity Code for Atmospheric Scattering
Observations. This code, written in Python, has heritage from a decades old, well-known Fortran model
used for several studies of planetary objects within the Solar System and beyond. We have adopted
it to include several methodologies for computing both direct and diffuse scattering phase functions,
and have added several updates including the ability to compute Raman scattering spectral features.
Here we benchmark PICASO against two independent codes and discuss the degree to which the model
is sensitive to a user's specification for various phase functions. Then, we conduct a full information
content study of the model across a wide parameter space in temperature, cloud profile, SNR and
resolving power.
1. INTRODUCTION
Across all the state-of-the-art pipelines that exist to
study atmospheric composition and climate from exo-
planets, about half a dozen have been developed for
transiting science, a few of which are open-source (e.g.
Madhusudhan & Seager 2009; Line et al. 2012; Benneke
& Seager 2012; Waldmann et al. 2015; Barstow et al.
2017; Zhang et al. 2019). This abundance of model
development has overall improved the quality of all of
these models, has contributed to interesting model inter-
comparison studies (e.g. Baudino et al. 2017), and in-
creased accessibility of traditionally private codes.
On the other hand, for observations of reflected light
from directly imagined exoplanets there have only been
two, neither of which are open source (Lupu et al. 2016;
Lacy et al. 2019). An additional branch of models, used
for Solar System/Earth science also exists to compute
reflected light from planetary atmospheres (NEMESIS, Ir-
win et al. (2008); DISORT, Stamnes et al. (1988); PSG,
Villanueva et al. (2018)). NEMESIS is well-vetted, and
has been used for retrieving composition from dozens of
observations of Jupiter (e.g. Irwin et al. 2019a), Nep-
Corresponding author: Natasha E. Batalha
[email protected]
tune (e.g. Irwin et al. 2019b), Titan (e.g. Thelen et al.
2019) and many more. DISORT is an open-source forward
model, however cannot be used to retrieve atmospheric
composition. Note that all retrieval models consist of a
versatile and fast forward model that can be wrapped
in a statistical algorithm. DISORT contains several hard-
wired assumptions for terrestrial conditions and is not
versatile/fast enough to use in a retrieval framework.
PSG is the retrieval tool of the ExoMars mission and has
been used for other investigations such as Earth and the
NASA Infrared Telescope Facility. Lastly, ray-tracing
forward models, such as Dyudina et al. (2016), would
also be computationally intensive and complex to wrap
into a retrieval framework for exoplanets.
With the detection and analysis of reflected light from
optical phase curves (Demory et al. 2013; Esteves et al.
2015; Niraula et al. 2018) and optical photometry (Evans
et al. 2013; Barstow et al. 2014; Garcia Munoz & Isaak
2015; Webber et al. 2015; Lee et al. 2017), and the on-
set of reflected light direct imaging missions on the hori-
zon, such has WFIRST and ELTs, Spergel et al. (2013),
there has been an increasing demand for an accessible,
versatile reflected light code.
Here, we present the Planetary Intensity Code for
Atmospheric Scattering Observations (PICASO). It is
2
Batalha et al.
available through Github1, and can be installed through
pip or conda. Tutorials for running the code are avail-
able online2 along with an in-depth physics tutorial for
the derivation of the radiative transfer of the code3.
1.1. The Heritage of the Code
The methodology of PICASO partly originates from the
Fortran albedo spectra model described in several stud-
ies of planetary objects within the Solar System (McKay
et al. 1989; Marley & McKay 1999) and beyond (Mar-
ley et al. 1999). These models utilized radiative trans-
fer methods described in Toon et al. (1977, 1989) and
only included the capability to compute monochromatic
scattered radiation observed at full phase. Later, Ca-
hoy et al. (2010) introduced the capability to compute
the monochromatic scattered radiation observed at any
phase angle. Since then the model has been widely used
in several studies of exoplanets including: retrievals of
exoplanet atmospheres (Lupu et al. 2016; Nayak et al.
2017) sulfur hazes in giant exoplanet atmospheres (Gao
et al. 2017), Earth analogues in reflected light (Feng
et al. 2018), water absorption in cool giants (MacDonald
et al. 2018), and color classification of directly imaged
exoplanets (Batalha et al. 2018b), among others.
While the code bifurcated across several of these anal-
yses (e.g. updates to molecular opacities, various ways
to regrid the atmosphere, varying phase functions, dif-
ferent sources of scattering and cloud opacity) the bulk
of the radiative transfer in the code has remained rela-
tively similar since the original publications of McKay
et al. (1989); Marley et al. (1999); Cahoy et al. (2010).
Individual changes for each analysis lack trace-ability
since the age of version control through Github is a re-
cent phenomenon.
PICASO is the first open-source compilation of all these
previous works. It is written in Python and is designed
to be user-friendly and versatile enough to handle all the
use cases that have come before it, and additional use
cases yet to be explored.
1.2. Exoplanet Diversity & the Need for Versatility
At the foundation of any reflected light code is an as-
sumption of a scattering phase function, p(cos Θ), used
to describe the angular dependence of how light is scat-
tered. Assumptions of phase functions vary widely in
complexity (Hansen 1969). The most simplistic assump-
tion is an isotropic scattering phase function.
In this
case, there is equal probability of arriving photons trav-
1 (cid:135):Github
2 /:Code Tutorial
3 (cid:252):Physics Tutorial
eling to scatter in any given direction. Of course, scat-
tering by gasses and particles is not isotropic. To ac-
count for more realistic phase functions, an asymmetry
parameter, g, is usually introduced, and used with more
complex phase functions. It is important to note that
asymmetry values vary widely depending on the specific
optical properties of the condensing species (e.g., Morley
et al. 2012).
Figure 1 shows distributions of asymmetry parame-
ters and single scattering albedos from a wide range of
giant planet models computed in Batalha et al. (2018b)
(data is available through Batalha et al. (2018c)). All
cloud models were computed using Ackerman & Marley
(2001) for a Jupiter-like system (1×Solar metallicity, 25
ms−2), with varying semi-major axes (i.e equilibrium
temperatures). For reference, the asymmetry parame-
ters of well-studied cirrus clouds and volcanic aerosols
are also shown (Thomas & Stamnes 2002).
At 5 AU from a Sun-like star, H2O/NH3 clouds dom-
inate the optical behavior, leading to high asymmetry
values/single scattering albedo. At hotter temperatures
more exotic cloud species such as ZnS and, Na2S begin
to widen and decrease the distribution of asymmetry val-
ues/single scattering albedos. Exoplanet atmospheres,
which cover a broad range in mass and temperature
space, will exhibit a wide range of optical properties.
To emphasize how these wide ranges of optical prop-
erties propagate to the behavior of the phase function,
Figure 2 shows a typical phase function computed for a
range in asymmetry parameters, g.
The extreme range in these differences motivated the
design of the new code. We aimed to create a code
where fundamental radiative transfer assumptions, such
as that of the phase function, could be easily assessed.
We hope that this will guide development of future fa-
cilities, and facilitate a symbiotic relationship between
future observations and the improvement of theoretical
models of directly imaged exoplanets.
1.3. Organization
In what follows we describe the methodology of
PICASO in §2, with a special emphasis on the new
physics/capabilities that have been introduced. Then
we will analyze the major assumptions made in our cal-
culations of the reflected light in §3 in order to show
which assumptions the calculations are most sensitive
to across a large parameter space in planet temperature,
cloud composition, and stellar type. In §4 we validate
PICASO against two different independent calculations.
Then, given the most up-to-date specifics of a future
space-based direct imaging mission, we use PICASO to
do a full information-content analysis across SNR and
PICASO
3
Figure 1. Aggregated asymmetry parameters, and single scattering albedos from the grid of models used in Batalha et al.
(2018b). Each distribution showcases the diversity of values we should expect for different temperature exoplanets ranging from
semi-major axis= 0.5− 5 AU. For reference, the cloud icon represents the asymmetry and single scattering of a cirrus cloud, and
the volcano icon represents the same of aged volcanic aerosols (Thomas & Stamnes 2002). Main Point: Exoplanet atmospheres
will exhibit a diverse range in optical properties.
Figure 2. A two-tern Henyey-Greenstein phase function
for a range of asymmetry values.Main Point: Seemingly
small changes to g propagate to large differences in the phase
function behavior. (cid:252)
Figure 3. Model schematic of PICASO. (cid:252)
resolving power. Here, we will specifically focus on
our ability to constrain atmospheric composition and
gravity. We end with a discussion and conclusion in §6.
2. PICASO: THE FORWARD MODEL
A full derivation of the radiative transfer of the for-
ward model can be found online. As is with any at-
mospheric scattering code, we begin with the radiative
transfer equation (Goody & Yung 1989):
I(τi, µ) = I(τi+1, µ)eδτi/µ
−
(cid:90) δτi
0
S(τ(cid:48)µ)e−τ /µdτ '/µ (1)
Here, the terms are as following:
• I(τi, µ): the azimuthally averaged intensity emer-
gent from the top of an atmospheric layer, i, with
opacity, τ , and outgoing angle, µ
• I(τi+1, µ)eδτi/µ:
the incident intensity on the
lower boundary of the layer attenuated by the
optical depth within the layer, δτ
• S(τ(cid:48), µ): the source function, integrated over all
layers
In our formalism, the source function only consists of
two components: 1) the single-scattered radiation, and
2) the multiple scattered radiation, integrated over all
diffuse angles. In other words, we do not include a ther-
mal term in the source function. Traditionally, dating
back to (Toon et al. 1989), the thermal and reflected
light terms have been computed separately. We leave
the addition of the thermal component to a future up-
date so that the source function has the form:
S(τ(cid:48), µ) =
ω
4π
F0Psingle(µ,−µ0)e−τ(cid:48)/µs+
(cid:90) 1
−1
ω
2
I(τ(cid:48), µ(cid:48))Pmulti(µ, µ(cid:48))dµ(cid:48)
(2)
where the first term is the single-scattered radiation,
whose behavior is described by the phase function
Psingle(µ,−µ0), and the second term is the multiple
0.40.50.60.70.80.91.00.40.50.60.70.80.91.00.50.60.70.851.01.52.03.04.05.0Semi Major Axis (AU)Asymmetry ParameterSingle Scattering AlbedoBack ● Forward ScatteringLight comes from hereg0.50.60.70.80.9 4
Batalha et al.
scattered radiation, whose behavior is described by
Pmulti(µ, µ(cid:48)). A schematic of the plane-parallel model
is shown in Figure 3.
In addition to basic planetary properties (e.g. stellar
spectrum, planet mass & radius) PICASO takes in as
input: 1) a pressure-temperature profile and altitude-
dependent abundances (see /, justdoit.atmosphere()),
and 2) a cloud profile (single scattering albedo,
asymmetry parameter, and total extinction; see /,
justdoit.clouds()). As further shown in the tutorial,
the cloud profile can either be input as a full altitude
dependent profile parameterized or generated from a
model such as Ackerman & Marley (2001), or it can
be input as different cloud layers that are arbitrarily
set by additionally supplying the cloud top pressures
and vertical extent of each layer. PICASO is designed to
accommodate several different input styles in order to
be highly customizable for each user.
Our methodology is thoroughly described in Cahoy
et al. (2010) (see Section 3.2). In short, we follow the
source function method in Toon et al. (1989). We first
use the two-stream quadrature to solve for the diffuse
scattered radiation. Then, we use the resulting two-
stream intensity to approximate the source function.
There are several other methods of solving this, e.g. δ-M
stream method (Wiscombe 1977), which we will explore
in a future release of the code.
PICASO includes several ways of handling the single
and multiple scattering phase functions, as compared
with (Cahoy et al. 2010). Additionally, PICASO has been
written to include a more physically motivated method-
ology for Raman Scattering. Therefore, we will devote
§2.1, §2.2, & §2.4 to these specific components and we
reference Cahoy et al. (2010) for an explanation of the
boundary condition formalism, which has not been al-
tered. Finally, in §2.5 & §2.6 we derive the methodology
for computing various types of albedos and the planet
phase geometry, respectively.
2.1. The Single Scattering Component
For the direct/single scattering component, the most
widely used form is the Henyey-Greenstein (HG) phase
function because it is: a function of g, generally resem-
bles "real" phase functions, and is non-negative for all
values of Θ. The one-term HG phase function has the
form:
1 − g2
pOT HG =
(1 + g2 − 2g cos Θ)3/2
(3)
Here, g is the asymmetry parameter, which is defined
as:
p(cos Θ)cosΘdω
(4)
(cid:90)
g =
1
4π
4π
where Θ is the angle between the original direction and
the scattered direction (related to the planet's phase, α
function via α = π− Θ). By defining this parameter, we
only need to determine the relative proportion of pho-
tons that are scattered in the forward versus backward
direction (as opposed to each individual intensity).
The asymmetry parameter, g can be any value −1 ≤
g ≤ 1. In the limit when g = 1, photons approximately
continue traveling in their original direction, when g =
−1 their directions are reversed, and when g = 0 they
are equally likely to travel in the forward or backward
direction (i.e. isotropy, (cid:252)).
Using Equation 3 for the single scattering phase func-
tion, is easily accessed in PICASO (/), but it is not the
default. This is because although Equation 3 captures
the observed forward peak relatively well, it fails to cap-
ture the additional (albeit smaller) backward scattering
peak that has been observed on the Moon, Mars, Venus
and Jupiter (Sudarsky et al. 2005). To account for this,
a second term in the phase function can be introduced :
PT T HG(cos Θ) = f POT HG(cos Θ, gf )
+ (1 − f )POT HG(cos Θ, gb).
(5)
Here, in addition to having two asymmetry factors (gf
for the forward & gb for the backward), we also have a
new parameter, f , which describes the fraction of for-
ward to back scattering. In PICASO, we give f the func-
tional form of
f = c1 + c2gc3
b
(6)
where users can specify c1, c2, and c3. By default,
PICASO, sets gf = ¯g, gb = −¯g/2, and f = 1 − g2
b . ¯g
is the cloud asymmetry factor that is computed directly
from the cloud code eddysed, weighted by the contribu-
tion of cloud opacity (¯g = gcldτcld/τscat)(Ackerman &
Marley 2001).
However these values are certainly not universal.
Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune all exhibit slightly
different forward/back scattering peaks (Sudarsky et al.
2005; Dyudina et al. 2016). For observations of exoplan-
ets, these parameters will have to be fit for.
The last component to consider is the effect of
Rayleigh scattering, which acts to increase the back
scattering peak. The Rayleigh phase function has the
form:
Pray(cos Θ) =
(1 + cos2 Θ)
(7)
3
4
In order to incorporate both Rayleigh and the cloud scat-
tering properties, we combine TTHG and Equation 7,
by weighting the two phase functions by the fractional
opacity of each. In other words, if τcld is the contribu-
tion of scattering from clouds, τray is the contribution
PICASO
5
Formalism
Inputs Required
Pro/Con
Eqn. 3
Eqn. 5
Eqn. 8
g
gf , gb, c1,c2,c3
Does not capture back scattering.
Captures small back peak.
gf , gb, c1,c2,c3, τray,τcld Captures sharper back scattering caused by Rayleigh.
Key
OTHG
TTHG
TTHG Raya
aPICASO default
Table 1. Single Scattering Options /
of scattering from Rayleigh, and τscat is the total scat-
tering, the phase function takes the form:
PT T HG ray =
τcld
τscat
PT T HG +
τray
τscat
PRay
(8)
This methodology was used in (Feng et al. 2018) and
a similar methodology was employed in Cahoy et al.
(2010).
It is also the default methodology used in
PICASO. Table 1 has a full summary of the single scat-
tering methodology.
2.2. Multiple Scattering Component
We cannot use the same forms for phase functions, as
we did in §2.1, because the multiple scattering compo-
nent of the source function (Equation 2) must be inte-
grated over all diffuse angles, µ.
An additional convenience of the HG phase function,
is that we can mathematically write it as a series of
Legendre polynomials:
Pmulti(cos Θ) ≈ N−1(cid:88)
l=0
βlPl(cos Θ)
(9)
(cid:90) −1
2l + 1
2
1
where Pl(cos Θ) are the polynomials (not to be confused
with another phase function), and βl are the moments
of the phase function. The moments can be written out
as:
βl =
Pl(cos Θ)p(cos Θ)d cos Θ
(10)
which should look familiar, given the previous equa-
tion shown for the asymmetry factor (see Equation
4). Therefore, the moment can just be simplified to
βl = (2l + 1)gl.
Expanding this polynomial to simply an N = 1 ex-
pansion gives us:
Pmulti(cos Θ) = 1 + 3¯g cos Θ = 1 + 3¯gµµ(cid:48)
(11)
authors (originating from Snook 1999), have leveraged
the fact that the second order Legendre dependence
on cos2 Θ is the same as that of Rayleigh (see Equa-
tion 7). Therefore, by forcing the second moment
βl = (2l+1)gl = g2 to yield the Rayleigh phase function,
we can accurately account for Rayleigh scattering. We
set this new parameter, g2 = τray/(2τscat), so that when
Rayleigh dominates the total opacity, g2 approaches 1/2,
the correct value for Rayleigh (Hansen & Travis 1974).
For multiple scattering, the two options for PICASO
are N=1 and N=2 expansions (N=2, being the default).
However, we can also add δ-Eddington methodology (ex-
plained in the following section) to further improve ac-
curacy.
2.3. δ-Eddington
Low order Legendre expansions are not adequate
enough to represent very high forward scattering (which
is very asymmetric). Given the high scattering asym-
metry produced by Mie scattering particles with sizes
larger than typical optical wavelengths (Figure 1), this
could be problematic.
In order to make lower order
approximations more accurate, PICASO leverages the δ-
Eddington Approximation (Joseph et al. 1976). In this
approximation, ¯g, τ, ω (the single scattering albedo) are
all scaled by recognizing that a beam which experiences
a high degree of forward scattering from high albedo
particles essentially still propagates forward with little
alteration:
g(cid:48) =
¯g
1 + ¯g
, τ(cid:48) = τ (1 − ω¯g2), ω(cid:48) =
ω(1 − ¯g2)
1 − ω¯g2
(12)
Figure 4 shows a full comparison of all the multiple scat-
tering phase functions. Note, the N = 2 expansion
with δ-scaling reduces the forward peak to regions where
the Legendre polynomials should be in higher agreement
with the TTHG (i.e. lower asymmetry).
2.4. Raman Scattering
where an azimuthal independence assumption can re-
duce cos Θ = µµ(cid:48).
One downfall to this formalism (similar to the OTHG)
is that it fails to capture the behavior of Rayleigh scat-
tering (as ¯g is zero for Rayleigh). Therefore, many
A small fraction of photons that are scattered via the
well-known Rayleigh process, experience a shift to red-
der wavelengths caused by the excitation of rotational
and vibrations transitions in atmospheric gasses. Al-
though some incident stellar photons are shifted, when
6
Batalha et al.
Figure 4. All the options for multiple-scattering phase functions included within PICASO. TTHG with Rayleigh is shown for
reference. Main Point: As asymmetry increases, approximations to the TTHG phase function get progressively worse. (cid:252) /
we compute the albedo, we normalize by the original in-
cident flux (see Equation 15). This discrepancy between
the shifted incident radiation and the original incident
radiation creates new spectral features in the albedo cal-
culation. These detectable shifts are called "ghost" fea-
tures in the reflected light spectra of planetary atmo-
spheres (Price 1977).
Raman scattering has been detected in the reflected
light of all Solar System gas giants (e.g. Karkoschka
1994; Yelle et al. 1987; Courtin 1999). Recently, it was
also suggested that Raman scattering could be an impor-
tant indicator of the main spectroscopic scatterer in the
atmospheres of exoplanets, such as H2 vs. N2 (Oklopci´c
et al. 2016). Additionally, it was shown that varying
stellar spectra will have a non-negligible affect on the
reflected light of exoplanets (Oklopci´c et al. 2017).
For the studies of exoplanets, the effect of Raman scat-
tering has been approximated using the methodology of
Pollack et al. (1986) (e.g. Marley et al. 1999; Sudarsky
et al. 2005; Cahoy et al. 2010). All of these analyses com-
puted Raman scattering correction terms for a 6000 K
blackbody. The Pollack et al. (1986) approximation cap-
tures the overall shape of Raman scattering by H2 (i.e.
decreased reflectively toward the blue). However, it fails
to capture specific 'ghost' features from the stellar spec-
trum at higher resolving powers (as the shift of individ-
ual stellar spectral lines are resolved).
For PICASO, we modify the Pollack et al. (1986) ap-
proximation to include the Raman cross sections of H2
computed by Oklopci´c et al. (2016). We also retain the
original Pollack et al. (1986) methodology, as an option,
for low resolution, low SNR observations.
Following Pollack et al. (1986) we introduce the effect
of Raman scattering by adding a correction term to the
Rayleigh opacity, τRay.
where σRam,Ray are the cross sections of both Raman
and Rayleigh scattering, respectively, and fλ, λ∗ are
the solar spectra at unshifted, and shifted wavelengths.
Each excitation corresponds to a specific wavelength
shift of λ∗−1 = λ−1 + ∆λ−1, where ∆λ is the wave-
length shift. For reference, the strongest transition of
H2 (the vibrational fundamental) is ∆ν = 4161 cm−1.
Unlike Pollack et al. (1986), we use stellar spectral
models from Castelli & Kurucz (2004) for this analy-
sis. PICASO uses PySynphot (STScI Development Team
2013) so that users can draw from different stellar
databases.
Additionally, we include initial rotational levels rang-
ing from J=0 to J=9 for H2 only since those were the
transitions provided by Oklopci´c et al. (2016). The cross
sections for any given transition from an initial quantum
state of v = 0, Ji, to final quantum state of vf , Jf is given
by (see Equation A4; Oklopci´c et al. (2016)):
σRam(0, Ji, ff , Jf , λ) =
C
λ ∗ λ3 [cm2]
(14)
The constant C is given by the values in Table A1 of
Oklopci´c et al. (2016).
In a future update we will include Raman scattering
by N2 and He but for this work, H2 is sufficient to study
the approximate behavior or Raman scattering.
2.5. Computing Different Types of Albedos
PICASO computes three different kinds of albedos:
spherical albedo (As), geometric albedo (Ag), and the
Bond albedo (Ab). The spherical albedo, As, is the frac-
tion of incident light reflected by a sphere towards all
angles, and it can be computed for a planet phase ge-
ometry, α, by:
(cid:90) π
0
As(λ) = 2
Fp(α, λ)
F0,L(λ)
sin αdα
(15)
fRam =
σRay + σRam(fλ∗/fλ)
σRay + σRam
(13)
where Fp is the emergent flux from the planet, and F0,L
is the flux from a perfect Lambert disk under the same
Back ● ForwardLight comes from hereBack ● ForwardBack ● Forwardg=0g=0.3g=0.7RayleighTTHG+RayN=1N=2N=2, δ-scale PICASO
7
(cid:90) π
0
(cid:82) ∞
(cid:82) ∞
incident flux, F0. This spherical albedo, integrated over
all angles can be written in two parts: the geometric
albedo, and the phase integral. The geometric albedo is
just the ratio of the reflected planet flux at full phase,
to the incident flux from the perfect Lambert disk:
Ag(λ) =
Fp(α = 0◦, λ)
F0,L(λ)
.
(16)
Then, the phase integral, which is normalized to be 1.0
at full phase, can be written as:
q = 2
Fp(α, λ)
Fp(α = 0◦, λ)
sin αdα.
(17)
Although we do not show any Bond albedos here,
PICASO does contain the functionality to compute it.
The Bond albedo is a stellar flux-weighted reflectivity
that is integrated by wavelength:
Ab =
0 As(λ)F0(λ)dλ
0 F0(λ)dλ
.
(18)
Therefore, Bond albedos will vary for two planets that
have identical spherical/geometric albedos but orbit dif-
ferent stars (Marley et al. 1999). Since a directly imaged
exoplanet will never be observed at full phase, the tradi-
tional geometric albedo (which arose from Solar System
heritage) can be somewhat cumbersome, given the ra-
tio to the ideal Lambert disk. Nevertheless for ease of
comparison with the existing literature we here report
results primarily in this framework.
2.6. Planet Phase Geometry
In order to capture phase-dependence, we compute
the emergent intensity from the disk at several plane-
parallel facets, where each facet has its own incident
and outgoing angles. Following Horak & Little (1965),
we use a Chebyshev-Gauss integration method to inte-
grate over all the emergent intensities (also used in Ca-
hoy et al. 2010; Madhusudhan & Burrows 2012; Webber
et al. 2015). By default, PICASO includes 10 Chebyshev
and 10 Gauss angles, which strikes a balance between
computational speed and physical accuracy. However
this can easily be modified in the code (see options in
justdoit.phase angle()). Of course, increasing the
number of angles, increases compute time. However, if
the user is particularly interested in capturing scatter-
ing at high cosine angles (e.g. near the limbs), then it is
necessary to increase the number of integration angles
accordingly.
Chebyshev-Gauss angles easily translate to planetary
latitude and longitude, making it possible to explore the
effect of 3D general circulation models on albedo spec-
tra, as in e.g. Webber et al. (2015) and Lee et al. (2017).
Although we do not currently include this in the set of
PICASO tutorials, we will make this jupyter notebook
available soon.
3. AN ANALYSIS OF THE MODELING
ASSUMPTIONS
Given our reflected light model, we now aim to deter-
mine which modeling assumptions are most important
across a large range in parameter space. In particular,
we are interested in sampling a parameter space across
approximate temperature, cloud properties, and stellar
spectrum (to test effects of Raman scattering).
In order to do so, we require, as input, the temperature-
pressure profiles, cloud structure, atmospheric compo-
sition profile. Batalha et al. (2018b) created a large
grid across this particular parameter space. It covered,
for a planet with a gravity of 25 m/s2, planets with
semi-major axes ranging from 0.5-5 AU around a Sun-
like star, metallicities (M/H) of 1-100×Solar, and cloud
profiles ranging from fsed = 0.01 − 6.
We use these models published in Batalha et al.
(2018b) as input. Briefly, the temperature profiles were
computed using the radiative-convective model initially
developed by McKay et al. (1989) and later updated by
Marley & McKay (1999); Marley et al. (2002); Fortney
et al. (2005, 2008).
The cloud profiles were computed using a Mie scatter-
ing treatment of particle sizes calculated from the model
developed by Ackerman & Marley (2001). Each pro-
file was computed using a specific value of fsed, which
is used to tune the sedimentation efficiency of the at-
mosphere. High values of fsed > 1, produce vertically
thin clouds with large particles, low values of fsed < 1,
produce the opposite -- vertically thick clouds with small
particles. The Ackerman & Marley (2001) produces, as
output: single scattering albedo, cloud extinction, and
asymmetry values as a function of atmospheric layer,
and wavelength.
The top panel of Figure 5 contains two plots which
show the depth in the atmosphere at which the two way
optical depth encountered by a photon traversing the at-
mosphere at µ=0.5 is τ = 1, which we henceforth denote
as a photon attenuation plot. These two models, chosen
from our grid, are computed at 1×Solar with a semi-
major axis of 5 AU. The left panel contains a model
of a cloud-free system, while the right contains a sys-
tem with a cloud sedimentation efficiency of fsed=3. We
showcase these two case studies throughout the analysis
of the modeling assumptions.
The shaded regions of the photon attenuation plot in-
dicate what the dominant source of opacity is as a func-
tion of wavelength: molecular absorption (blue), cloud
8
Batalha et al.
Figure 5. Photon attenuation plot, which shows the pressure level at which the two way optical depth encountered by a photon
traversing the atmosphere at µ = 0.5 is τ = 1 (top panel). The lower panel shows the corresponding albedo spectra. Each
spectrum is computed for a 25 m s−2 Jupiter-like planet, 5 AU from a Sun-like star. The left panel is a cloud-free model, while
the right panel contains a cloud profile modeled with a sedimentation efficiency of fsed = 3. Main Point: Photon attenuation
plot shows the dominant source of reflectivity, and therefore can give insight into the overall shape of the reflected light spectrum.
absorption and scattering (green), or Rayleigh scatter-
ing (pink). Over the full illuminated hemisphere of a
planet the angle of incidence of course varies from µ = 0
to 1 and scattering within cloud decks can increase the
effective path length of a photon through the absorbing
gas. Thus no single plot can fully capture the complete
complexity inherent in the problem, but we find plots
such as these helpful for understanding how the shape
of reflected light spectra can be traced back to the dom-
inant sources of reflectivity and absorption in the atmo-
sphere. This is especially true for cases where you may
have an interplay between the muting of strong scatter-
ing features (e.g. Raman) from the presence of optical
absorbers (e.g. Na & K).
Indeed such plots are commonly used in Solar Sys-
tem planetary science to help illuminate the relative im-
portance of scattering and absorption at different wave-
lengths (e.g., Sromovsky et al. 2009).
3.1. Sensitivity to Single Scattering Phase Function
We first explore the sensitivity of PICASO to the choice
in single scattering phase function. Figure 6 shows the
same planet case as that in Figure 5. The same spectrum
was run using each of the four ways of representing direct
scattering in PICASO.
For a cloud-free case where there are no highly asym-
metry scatterers, the two TTHG functions and the func-
tion used in Cahoy et al. (2010) are all identical (since
gcld = 0). However, the cloud-free case shows deviations
from the code default (TTHG ray) on the order of 10-30%
when the OTHG phase function is used.
For the cloudy case, Cahoy et al.'s phase function
closely matches TTHG ray, except when Rayleigh scat-
tering opacity is high toward the blue where deviations
of ≤ 10% are present. Note all deviations are strongly
sensitive to wavelength.
OTHG exhibits the greatest deviation from the other
phase functions, because it is not accounting for the
back scattering peak from Rayleigh scattering. Figure
2 shows that the Rayleigh contribution as a small back
scattering contribution. It is important to note that the
actual Rayleigh phase function is symmetric forward and
back. But when you combine it with forward scattering
particles, the net scattering is more forward.
Even for cases that are seemingly less asymmetric
(semi-major axis, as=0.5 AU, see Figure 1), the specifi-
cation for direct scattering phase function can still pro-
duce spectra that have maximum differences on the or-
der of 100% for full phase observations, and 50% for
phase=90◦.
Although we do not show the specific effect of chang-
ing, f , the fraction of forward to back scattering, it will
also strongly impact the resultant spectrum. Smaller
fractions will produce smaller back scattering peaks and
yield significantly dimmer spectra across wavelength,
and vice versa.
Modeling Recommendation:
• Use default specification for direct scattering
(TTHG Ray)
0.30.40.50.60.70.80.91Wavelength (μm)0.30.40.50.60.70.80.91Wavelength (μm)110100Pressure (bars)1101000.60.40.20Geom. Albedo0.60.40.20MolecularCloudScatteringτ=0.5 pressure level: PICASO
9
Figure 6. PICASO's four different methodologies for direct scattering phase functions. All spectra are computed at full phase
for a 25m/s2 Jupiter-like planet 5 Au from a Sun-like star. The left panel is a cloud-free model, while the right panel contains
a cloud profile modeled with fsed=3. Main Point: Assumptions of direct scattering phase function have large effect (≤30%)
on the resultant spectrum across all wavelengths. (cid:252) /
• Fit for the functional form of the fraction, f , of
forward to back scattering according to the prob-
lem being addressed.
3.2. Multiple Scattering Phase Function & δ-Eddington
Next, we assess PICASO's sensitivity to the multiple
scattering phase function, and the δ-Eddington approx-
imation. Figure 7 shows the modeling sensitivity to the
user's choice for multiple scattering phase function. For
both cloud-free and cloudy cases, there are ≤ 1% dif-
ferences when choosing between a N = 1 or N = 2
Legendre expansion. The N = 2 expansion is used to
approximate the multiple scattering by Rayleigh scat-
tering. Therefore, for the cases modeled here, the dif-
fuse scattering by Rayleigh is a relatively small contri-
bution to the total reflectivity. As observations increase
in precision we will have to revisit whether or not this
holds true. Studies of the accuracy of Legendre poly-
nomial expansions suggest that they made degrade in
accuracy for asymmetric large particles (Zhang et al.
2017). Zhang et al. (2017) also suggested that Cheby-
shev polynomial expansions as a more accurate alterna-
tive. We will save this for a future update, when better
data warrant higher accuracy phase functions.
In order to improve the parameterization of these ex-
pansions, PICASO leverages the δ-Eddington method of
scaling the single scattering albedo, opacity, and asym-
metry parameter. When gcld is nonzero, choice of the
δ-Eddington method impacts the spectra by up to 30%
in some cases. We set N = 2 δ-Eddington as default
since it can reproduce, with relatively high accuracy,
observations of Earth (Feng et al. 2018), and Jupiter
(Cahoy et al. 2010).
As more diverse populations of exoplanets are ob-
served in reflected light with higher signal-to-noise ra-
tio (SNR), we will conduct a more thorough investiga-
tion of these approximations. Since the publication of
the δ-Eddington method (Joseph et al. 1976), several
other techniques have also been developed to improve
the phase function parameterization (e.g. Hu et al. 2000;
Iwabuchi & Suzuki 2009; Sorensen et al. 2017). We will
consider these in a future update.
Modeling Recommendation: For planet cases with
some degree of asymmetric cloud scatterers, always
use N=2 Legendre polynomial expansion with the δ-
Eddington correction.
3.3. Raman Scattering
Figure 8 shows the modeling sensitivity to PICASO's
two methodologies for computing Raman scattering.
The Pollack et al. (1986) approximation captures the
general behavior of the decline in reflectively toward the
blue, but fails to produce any spectral features. When
the Pollack et al. approximation is modified to include
cross sections computed from Oklopci´c et al. (2016),
ghost spectral features are introduced at the ∼ 10%
level. Spectral features begin to disappear at R∼50,
but small 1% baseline differences still remain at R∼10.
For a Teff =6000 K star (the Pollack et al. default),
10% differences remain through 0.55µm (after the Mg I
feature at 5200A). Cooler stars (toward Teff =2600 K),
with more crowded molecular features, create spectral
differences out past 0.65 µm. Cloudy spectra (e.g. Fig-
ure 4 right panel) are also sensitive to Raman scattering
features despite the prominent cloud opacity in the blue.
Differences between the calculations here and those
shown in Oklopci´c et al. (2017) (see Figure 4) and Sro-
Cahoy et al 2010, TTHGOTHGTTHG w/o Rayleigh PhaseTTHG w/ Rayleigh PhaseCloudy, fsed=3Cloud free0.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.1Geometric Albedo0.30.40.50.60.70.80.910.30.40.50.60.70.80.91% dev.3020101010.1Direct Scattering Phase Approx.:Wavelength (μm)Wavelength (μm) 10
Batalha et al.
Figure 7. Spectra and percent deviation between the code default and all other PICASO specifications for phase function.
Planet cases are identical to those shown in Figure 6. Main Point: Use of δ-Eddington approximation has largest impact on
spectra.(cid:252) /
Figure 8. Spectra and percent deviation between the code default and all other PICASO specifications for phase function. Planet
cases are identical to those shown in Figure 6. Main Point: Even at low resolution (R=100), Raman scattering is important
to include, especially for cool stars./
movsky (2005) (see Figure 17) are attributed to the res-
olution of the stellar spectrum, and the stellar databases
chosen. A key input to modeling Raman scattering
correctly is an accurate, high-resolution stellar spec-
trum. Oklopci´c et al. (2017) used stellar spectra from
Valdes et al. (2004) database, which are computed with
∆λ=1 A. Sromovsky (2005) used a Solar spectrum from
the Upper Atmospheric Research Satellite, which had a
nominal resolution of 2 A.
The Castelli & Kurucz
(2004) grid used here is computed at a resolution of 10 A.
This lower resolution grid will result in an under estima-
tion of the Raman effect. One additional, minor, differ-
ence can be seen in the Tef f =2600 K spectrum. Around
0.35 µm, some spectral features appear to have flat tops.
This is a result, originally pointed out in Courtin (1999),
of instabilities in the solution of the radiative transfer
equation that prevent us from allowing Equation 13 to
be greater than 1. Despite these differences, our modi-
fied Pollack approximation is a much more accurate so-
lution than the original Pollack methodology.
One last subtlety is that Figure 8 makes it seem as
if Raman scattering has a dramatic effect on the total
energy of budget of the atmosphere. This is somewhat
exaggerated by the way in which the albedo is defined,
by ratioing to the stellar flux. It has to be accounted for
in order for the ratio to be correct, but in actuality is not
a huge influence on the energy budget of the atmosphere.
The effect of the small deposition of energy into the at-
mosphere by the small wavelength shifts that occur for
those photons that experience this form of scattering
would have to be computed by a complete radiative-
convective equilibrium code which carefully tracks the
Cloudy, fsed=3Cloud free0.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10.30.40.50.60.70.80.910.30.40.50.60.70.80.9110110010-110-2N=2 Legendre Poly, δ-Edd.N=1 Legendre Poly, δ-Edd.N=2 Legendre PolyN=1 Legendre Poly% dev.10010-110-2Geometric AlbedoMultiple Scattering Phase Approx.:Wavelength (μm)Wavelength (μm)0.30.350.40.450.50.550.600.65Wavelength (μm)Wavelength (μm)10210110010-1Mod. Pollack w/ OklopčićOriginal PollackNone10110010-110-2% dev.0.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.1Geometric AlbedoTeff=6000 KTeff=4000 KTeff=2600 KTeff=3500 KPollackModified Pollack w/ Oklopčić0.30.350.40.450.50.550.600.65Raman Scattering Approx.:Stellar Model: PICASO
11
Figure 9. A summary of the benchmark analysis between Dlugach & Yanovitskij (1974) and this work. Left two panels shows
the geometric albedo for a range of single scattering albedos and phase functions. Right-most plot shows the difference map
between the two. Main Point: Models agree within 10% for most cases, with a maximum discrepancy of 40% for highly
asymmetric cases.
the optical properties of Venus and the Jovian plan-
ets. Therefore, they carried out calculations for Rayleigh
and the HG phase functions with asymmetry parameters
ranging from 0-0.9, and single scattering albedos rang-
ing from 0.7-1. Madhusudhan & Burrows (2012) pro-
vided analytic phase expressions for geometric albedo as
a function of single scattering albedo for both Rayleigh
scattering and isotropy in a semi-infinite atmosphere.
We compare PICASO against two models (one originating
from Solar System science, the other originating from ex-
oplanet science) across a wide range in phase function,
and single scattering albedo is sufficient enough to prove
accuracy of the model.
Figure 9 shows the first comparison against Dlugach &
Yanovitskij (1974). Dlugach et al. used a one-term HG
phase function for all asymmetric calculations. There-
fore, it is important to note that if comparisons are car-
ried out using PICASO's default (as opposed to using
OTHG for the single scattering phase function), the re-
sults will not agree well. This further motivates our
choice for inheriting older methodologies of computing
phase functions so that fruitful code comparisons are
easily accessible.
Using a OTHG phase function, the models agree within
10% for all Rayleigh phase functions and for g ≤0.5.
The models start to exhibit 10% differences for 0.5 <
g ≤0.85. Since the diversity of cases illustrated in Fig-
ure 1 fall in this range of asymmetry values, we feel
that this can be considered in good agreement. There
are few cases with g = 0.9 that exhibit ∼40% differ-
ences. However, it is not obvious what these differences
could be attributed to. Dlugach & Yanovitskij (1974)
computes higher geometric albedos when single scatter-
Figure 10. Summary of the benchmark analysis between
Madhusudhan & Burrows (2012) and this work. The great-
est divergence occurs at very low geometric albedo (≤0.1).
Main Point: Overall, models agree within 10% in all
isotropic and rayleigh phase functions cases.
energy budget of the atmosphere. Since PICASO is fo-
cused on tracking the reflectivity of the atmosphere as
a whole it is not well suited to this particular task and
doing so is beyond the scope of this paper.
Modeling Recommendation: Choose Pollack et al.
methodology with Oklopci´c et al. (2016) cross sections,
and choose a stellar spectrum that matches the level of
resolution and accuracy needed.
4. BENCHMARK ANALYSIS
In order to benchmark the accuracy of the code,
we chose to compare against the results of Dlugach
& Yanovitskij (1974) and Madhusudhan & Burrows
(2012). Dlugach & Yanovitskij (1974) computed the
intensity of radiation diffusely reflected from a semi-
infinite homogeneous atmosphere with arbitrary single
scattering phase function. Their analysis focused on
Ray1.0000.9990.9950.9900.9800.9500.9000.8000.7001.0000.9990.9950.9900.9800.9500.9000.8000.7000.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.00.50.750.800.850.90Ray0.00.50.750.800.850.90Ray0.00.50.750.800.850.90-40%-30%-20%-10%0%10%20%30%40%% DeviationGeometric AlbedoPhase functionSingle Scattering AlbedoPhase functionPhase functionSingle Scattering AlbedoThis WorkDlugach & Yanovitskij (1974)1.00.10.01Geometric Albedo00.20.40.60.81.0Single Scattering AlbedoThis workMadhusudhan & Burrows (2011)IsotropicRayleigh 12
Batalha et al.
ing is less than 0.98, and lower geometric albedos when
single scattering is ∼1. Given the complete indepen-
dence of the two models, there are numerous factors
that could potentially contribute to this including: the
diffuse scattering calculation, geometric integration, ra-
diative transfer solver. Because majority of cases fall
within 10% agreement we consider these two models to
be in good agreement.
Figure 10 shows the comparison between the calcula-
tions in Madhusudhan & Burrows (2012) and PICASO.
Here, we only compare isotropic and Rayleigh cases
across a range of single scattering albedos. Our re-
sults are well within 10% agreement. The largest devia-
tion comes from the computation of very low geometric
albedos (∼0.01). Such very low single scattering albe-
dos are well outside the range expected for the types of
clouds expected (Figure 1), although unusual composi-
tion particles (e.g., Gao et al. (2017)) can be quite dark
at some wavelengths. We consider PICASO and the ana-
lytic model of Madhusudhan & Burrows (2012) to be in
good agreement.
5. INFORMATION CONTENT ANALYSIS OF
REFLECTED LIGHT
Currently, an important driver for the creation of
PICASO is to determine optimal observing strategies for
future direct imaging missions, such as WFIRST, ELTs,
and potential large space based observatories such as
LUVOIR or HabEx. For example, determining band
pass ranges, minimum SNR, and instrument resolv-
ing powers that maximize the total retrievable infor-
mation from a planetary reflected light spectrum will
be a critical contribution to the design of future facili-
ties. Throughout this analysis, we focus specifically on
the approximate SNR, bandpass, and resolution of the
WFIRST -Coronographic Instrument, which is a tech-
nology demonstrator for future concept mission like LU-
VOIR or HabEx. Our methodology, though, can be ap-
plied to any parameter space.
Lupu et al. (2016) and Nayak et al. (2017) began to
explore optimal observing strategies by wrapping the
original Fortran code outlined in Cahoy et al. (2010)
and others, in a sophisticated retrieval framework. Lupu
et al. (2016) focused on our ability to ascertain the pres-
ence or absence of clouds and CH4, while Nayak et al.
(2017) focused on our ability to constrain planet phase
and radius. These studies offered valuable insights into
our ability to constrain the atmospheres of exoplanets
with reflected light. However, the computational limita-
tions of MCMC (or similar) methods hinders our ability
to rapidly move through a large parameter space in at-
mospheric diversity, resolution, and SNR.
Information content (IC) theory offers an alternative
to full MCMC methods. IC has been commonly used in
Earth and Solar System science (e.g. Kuai et al. 2010;
Saitoh et al. 2009), as well as in exoplanet science (e.g.
Line et al. 2012; Batalha & Line 2017; Howe et al. 2017;
Batalha et al. 2018a). We use the IC model originally
developed for transiting exoplanet science. A full de-
scription of the methodology can be found in Batalha &
Line (2017).
IC theory relies heavily on computing the Jacobian
of individual systems, which describe how sensitive the
model is to slight perturbations of the state vector pa-
rameters at a given initial state.
In this analysis we
assume that the state vector is made up of [T (P ), ξi, g],
where T (P ) is the pressure-dependent temperature pro-
file, ξi is the mixing ratio of species i, and g is the grav-
ity. We compute the derivative of the Jacobian using a
centered-finite difference scheme. Our T (P ) and mixing
ratio profiles come from the calculations in Batalha et al.
(2018b), so that perturbations shift the entire profile.
T (P ) and g are perturbed linearly, with 0.1% perturba-
tions. ξi's are perturbed in log space, also with 0.1%
perturbations. These finite perturbations were chosen
to reproduce the results of a full retrieval analyses.
Of course there are several other parameters that con-
tribute to an atmospheric state. Choosing only T (P ),
ξi, g is almost certainly too simplistic. For example, as
we've seen here, the cloud asymmetry parameter and
the single scattering albedo will largely contribute to
how well we can constrain the atmospheres of exoplan-
ets. Additionally, Lupu et al. (2016) showed that the
pressure of the cloud deck will also influence the shape
of the spectral features.
In order to capture this be-
havior, we compute the Jacobian across a diversity of
initial states (as=0.5-5.0 AU, fsed=0.1-6) at a phase an-
gle of 90◦. As shown in Figure 1, this covers a broad
diversity of cases in single scattering and asymmetry, to
compensate for our simplistic state vector.
Along with the Jacobian, K, we also need an approx-
imation of the error covariance, Se, and Sa, the a prior
covariance matrix. We take the values of the error co-
variance matrix from the cases in Nayak et al. (2017) for
SNR=5-25. The priors, Sa, represents the information
we start with for any given system. We assume broad
uniform priors for every state vector parameter. In other
words, we assume to have very little information about
the system before conducting our observation: ±300 K
for T (P ), ±6 dex for mixing ratio, ±100m/s2 for gravity.
Given K, Se, and Sa, we can compute the posterior co-
variance matrix, which gives the 1-sigma uncertainty on
a state vector parameter after a measurement is made:
S = (KTS−1
e K + S−1
a )−1
(19)
PICASO
13
Information content analysis for a subset of the full parameter space covered here.
Figure 11.
In all plots, darker colors
correspond to tighter constrained planetary systems. All spectra simulations were computed for a 1×Solar, 25m/s2 planet,
around a Sun-like star. The approximate WFIRST wavelength range of 0.5-0.76µm was used with the SNR calculations
computed in Nayak et al. (2017). Due to the assumption of chemical equilibrium, the main absorber in all models shown is CH4.
On each subplot we show constant exposure-time contours for detector-noise-limited and photon-noise-limited observations.
Main Point: We need SNR=20 to constrain composition and gravity. Results are less sensitive to resolving power.
−1 dependence, using large priors guar-
Because of the Sa
antees that our estimates for the posterior covariance
matrix are solely driven by the model sensitivity (via
the Jacobian) and the expected data quality at each
wavelength (e.g. KTSe
). Additionally,
we spot checked our analysis against the full retrievals
done in Lupu et al. (2016) & Nayak et al. (2017), and
found that they are in good agreement.
K >> S−1
−1
a
Figure 11 shows a summary of the results of the
IC analysis for a subset of as and fsed. We focus on
this subset because it is the "sweet spot" in parameter
space for a WFIRST -CGI mission. However, we dis-
cuss the full parameter space in §5.1 & §5.2. Addition-
ally, Figure 11 shows constant exposure time contours
for both detector-noise and photon-limited observations.
Because WFIRST instrumentation has not yet been fi-
nalized, we cannot add definitive exposure times on each
of these curves. However, we include them anyways
to give readers an understanding of the SNR-Resolving
Power interplay, in terms of total time (e.g. for detector-
noise limited observations it takes equal time to achieve
SNR=25 at R=40, as SNR=5 at R=120). As WFIRST
instrumentation is solidified, we will perform more ro-
bust noise simulations with estimates for integration
time.
Overall, our ability to constrain composition and grav-
ity are more dependent on the SNR, as opposed to
instrument resolving power. Regardless of resolving
power, SNR=10 is not sufficient to constrain either com-
position or gravity (our definition of constraint is dis-
cussed in the following §5.1). Generally, a SNR∼20 is
needed to attain robust constraints on composition and
gravity.
5.1. Sensitivity to Composition
Figure 11 only shows the ability to constrain the abun-
dance of CH4, the dominant absorber at these temper-
atures. From as=0.5-5, there is a transition from alkali-
dominated atmospheres (Na & K) toward 0.5 AU, to
CH4-dominated atmospheres toward 5 AU. This transi-
tion, a result of chemical equilibrium, roughly occurs at
1.03.01.03.0fsedAU12010080604020510152025SNRR. Power1 sigma constraint gravity (m/s2)12010080604020R. Power510152025SNR510152025SNR510152025SNR1.03.010203040500.51.01.52.02.53.03.51 sigma constraint log CH4∝R-1
Detector-noise-limited∝R-0.5
Photon-noise-limitedConstant-exposure time-contours: 14
Batalha et al.
0.85 AU (see Batalha et al. 2018b), where both alkali and
CH4 features are comparatively small. WFIRST -CGI,
with a proposed wavelength coverage for spectroscopy
of ∼ 0.6 -- 0.76 µm will be primarily focused on the detec-
tion of CH4. Therefore, we only show figures for as = 1
& 3 AU because most of the considered targets will fall
in this range.
At SNR=5, constraints on CH4 approach the prior
value, meaning the observation does not contribute to
the overall knowledge. A definition of "good" constraint
is relatively arbitrary, but adopt the definition of Feng
et al. (2018), which is effectively the ability to constrain
the abundance within ±1.0 log units. Although, this
may seem too stringent a definition, IC analyses tends
to be more optimistic than full retrieval analyses. This
is because IC cannot pick up on important factors such
as degeneracies between state vector parameters.
The difference in being able to detect CH4 at 1 AU
versus 3 AU comes from the relative size of the molecu-
lar features, and the cloud composition. At 1 AU, even
though Na & K are nearly gone, CH4 is still not as
pronounced as it is at 3 AU, because the volume mix-
ing ratio is lower. Additionally, higher-in-altitude water
clouds will weaken the feature.
The cloud parameter fsed appears to have a lesser ef-
fect than semi-major axis. This is because at moder-
ately high values of fsed, the cloud deck is at low enough
pressures as to not completely impede the detection of
molecular features. For fsed ≤ 1, detection of CH4 (or
any other molecular feature) will be difficult to impos-
sible because the path length for reflected light through
the atmosphere is too short.
5.2. Sensitivity to Gravity
The effect of gravity on reflected light is summarized
in Figure 3 & 4 in Lupu et al. (2016). Generally, increas-
ing gravity increases the depth of spectral features and
increases reflectively towards the blue. There is also a
more subtle effect of gravity on the 0.8 µm H2 continuum
feature (at lower gravity the feature is stronger). We
are not able to leverage this effect because of WFIRST -
CGI's spectroscopic wavelength coverage.
For SNR≤ 10 the constraint on gravity, approaches
the prior, meaning the observation does yet not con-
tribute to the overall knowledge. It also appears that
1 AU systems are slightly more amenable to gravity
characterization as opposed to 3 AU. This because at
3 AU when fsed ≥ 1, water cloud reflectively dominates
the opacity, as opposed to at 1 AU, where there is still
a contribution from scattering by Rayleigh. When wa-
ter cloud opacity dominates the opacity, the spectrum
is less sensitive to slight perturbations in gravity. This
is also why the fsed=3 cases are better constrained, as
opposed to the fsed=1 cases.
6. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION
Here, we presented an initial release of a reflected
light code, called PICASO. PICASO is versatile enough
for calculations of reflected light spectroscopy, and for
retrievals of directly imaged exoplanet atmospheres. It
has been benchmarked against two independent codes
from Dlugach & Yanovitskij (1974) and Madhusudhan
& Burrows (2012). For isotropic and Rayleigh scatter-
ing, PICASO agrees with other codes to well within 10%.
For asymmetric scattering, calculations are slightly more
discrepant, but well within the bounds of observational
precision (∼ 10% agreement).
PICASO contains several methodologies for computing
calculations of reflected light. Specifically, we have fo-
cused on highlighting different methodologies for com-
puting single scattering, multiple scattering, and Raman
scattering. Within each section, we have provided rec-
ommendations for modeling exoplanets, which are also
PICASO's default run settings. A further explanation of
this is available in our online radiative transfer tutorial4.
Our information content analysis demonstrates the
approximate parameter space in cloud composition, re-
solving power, and SNR, where we can expect to get
robust constraints on composition and gravity. We find
that in general, we need an SNR∼20 to attain con-
straints on composition, where our definition for con-
straint is attaining a 1-σ confidence interval of ±1 log
unit on the volume mixing ratio of the dominant ab-
sorber (following Feng et al. 2018).
Despite the versatility of the original release, there are
still aspects which we are currently working on. Future
releases of the code will contain:
1. Thermal Emission
2. δ-M stream method (Wiscombe 1977)
3. Raman scattering by N2 and He
4. Chebyshev polynomial
for multiple scattering
phase function
5. Compatibility with nested sampling algorithm
Additionally, a robust retrieval analysis will be needed
to address degeneracies that cannot be captured in an
information content analysis. This includes developing
methods to constrain radius, directly retrieve the opti-
cal properties of the clouds (i.e. the imaginary compo-
nent of the refractive index), and discern the presence
4 (cid:252):Physics Tutorial
PICASO
15
of photochemical hazes. This analysis will additionally
be added as a future code release since PICASO contains
the modularity and versatility to support it.
We thank Kerri Cahoy for helpful discussion and
tracking down various versions of the original albedo
code. Additionally, we thank Cornell undergraduate
Mark Siebert, and Caltech graduate student Danica
Adams for being the first beta testers, and pointing
out some bugs in the code and installation. N.E.B ac-
knowledges support from the University of California
Presidents Postdoctoral Fellowship Program. M.S.M.
acknowledges support from GSFC Sellers Exoplanet En-
vironments Collaboration (SEEC), with funding specif-
ically by the NASA Astrophysics Divisions Internal Sci-
entist Funding Model.
Software: numba (Lam et al. 2015), pandas (McK-
inney 2010), bokeh (Bokeh Development Team 2014),
NumPy (Walt et al. 2011), IPython (P´erez & Granger
2007), Jupyter, (Kluyver et al. 2016),PySynphot (STScI
Development Team 2013), sqlite3 (sqlite3 Development
Team 2019),picaso(Batalha 2019)
REFERENCES
Ackerman, A. S., & Marley, M. S. 2001, ApJ, 556, 872,
Dyudina, U., Zhang, X., Li, L., et al. 2016, ApJ, 822, 76,
doi: 10.1086/321540
doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/822/2/76
Barstow, J. K., Aigrain, S., Irwin, P. G. J., et al. 2014,
Esteves, L. J., De Mooij, E. J. W., & Jayawardhana, R.
ApJ, 786, 154, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/154
2015, ApJ, 804, 150, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/150
Barstow, J. K., Aigrain, S., Irwin, P. G. J., & Sing, D. K.
Evans, T. M., Pont, F., Sing, D. K., et al. 2013, ApJL, 772,
2017, ApJ, 834, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/50
L16, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/772/2/L16
Batalha, N. 2019, natashabatalha/picaso: Initial
Publication Release, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.2647593.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2647593
Batalha, N. E., Lewis, N. K., Line, M. R., Valenti, J., &
Stevenson, K. 2018a, ApJL, 856, L34,
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aab896
Batalha, N. E., & Line, M. R. 2017, AJ, 153, 151,
doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa5faa
Batalha, N. E., Smith, A. J. R. W., Lewis, N. K., et al.
2018b, AJ, 156, 158, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aad59d
-- . 2018c, Color Classification of Extrasolar Giant Planets:
Prospects and Cautions, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.2003949.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2003949
Baudino, J.-L., Molli`ere, P., Venot, O., et al. 2017, ApJ,
850, 150, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa95be
Benneke, B., & Seager, S. 2012, ApJ, 753, 100,
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/753/2/100
Bokeh Development Team. 2014, Bokeh: Python library for
interactive visualization
Cahoy, K. L., Marley, M. S., & Fortney, J. J. 2010, ApJ,
724, 189, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/189
Castelli, F., & Kurucz, R. L. 2004, arXiv Astrophysics
e-prints
Courtin, R. 1999, Planet. Space Sci., 47, 1077,
doi: 10.1016/S0032-0633(99)00013-6
Demory, B.-O., de Wit, J., Lewis, N., et al. 2013, ApJL,
776, L25, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/776/2/L25
Feng, Y. K., Robinson, T. D., Fortney, J. J., et al. 2018,
AJ, 155, 200, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aab95c
Fortney, J. J., Lodders, K., Marley, M. S., & Freedman,
R. S. 2008, ApJ, 678, 1419, doi: 10.1086/528370
Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., Lodders, K., Saumon, D., &
Freedman, R. 2005, ApJL, 627, L69, doi: 10.1086/431952
Freedman, R. S., Marley, M. S., & Lodders, K. 2008, ApJS,
174, 504, doi: 10.1086/521793
Gao, P., Marley, M. S., Zahnle, K., Robinson, T. D., &
Lewis, N. K. 2017, AJ, 153, 139,
doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa5fab
Garcia Munoz, A., & Isaak, K. G. 2015, Proceedings of the
National Academy of Science, 112, 13461,
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1509135112
Goody, R. M., & Yung, Y. L. 1989, Atmospheric radiation :
theoretical basis
Hansen, J. E. 1969, Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 26,
478, doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1969)026(cid:104)0478:
EAASFM(cid:105)2.0.CO;2
Hansen, J. E., & Travis, L. D. 1974, SSRv, 16, 527,
doi: 10.1007/BF00168069
Horak, H. G., & Little, S. J. 1965, ApJS, 11, 373,
doi: 10.1086/190119
Howe, A. R., Burrows, A., & Deming, D. 2017, ApJ, 835,
96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/96
Hu, Y.-X., Wielicki, B., Lin, B., et al. 2000, Journal of
Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 65,
681
Dlugach, J. M., & Yanovitskij, E. G. 1974, Icarus, 22, 66,
Irwin, P. G. J., Bowles, N., Braude, A. S., et al. 2019a,
doi: 10.1016/0019-1035(74)90167-5
Icarus, 321, 572, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2018.12.008
16
Batalha et al.
Irwin, P. G. J., Toledo, D., Garland, R., et al. 2019b,
Icarus, 321, 550, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2018.12.014
Nayak, M., Lupu, R., Marley, M. S., et al. 2017, PASP,
129, 034401, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/129/973/034401
Irwin, P. G. J., Teanby, N. A., de Kok, R., et al. 2008,
Niraula, P., Redfield, S., de Wit, J., et al. 2018, arXiv
JQSRT, 109, 1136, doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.11.006
e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.09227
Iwabuchi, H., & Suzuki, T. 2009, Journal of Quantitative
Oklopci´c, A., Hirata, C. M., & Heng, K. 2016, ApJ, 832,
Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 110, 1926
30, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/30
Joseph, J. H., Wiscombe, W. J., & Weinman, J. A. 1976,
-- . 2017, ApJ, 846, 91, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8630
Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 33, 2452,
doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033(cid:104)2452:
TDEAFR(cid:105)2.0.CO;2
Karkoschka, E. 1994, Icarus, 111, 174,
doi: 10.1006/icar.1994.1139
P´erez, F., & Granger, B. E. 2007, Computing in Science &
Engineering, 9
Pollack, J. B., Rages, K., Baines, K. H., et al. 1986, Icarus,
65, 442, doi: 10.1016/0019-1035(86)90147-8
Price, M. J. 1977, Reviews of Geophysics and Space
Kluyver, T., Ragan-Kelley, B., P´erez, F., et al. 2016, in
Physics, 15, 227, doi: 10.1029/RG015i002p00227
ELPUB, 87 -- 90
Saitoh, N., Imasu, R., Ota, Y., & Niwa, Y. 2009, Journal of
Kuai, L., Natraj, V., Shia, R.-L., Miller, C., & Yung, Y. L.
2010, JQSRT, 111, 1296, doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2010.02.011
Geophysical Research (Atmospheres), 114, D17305,
doi: 10.1029/2008JD011500
Lacy, B., Shlivko, D., & Burrows, A. 2019, AJ, 157, 132,
Snook, K. J. 1999, PhD thesis, STANFORD UNIVERSITY
doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab0415
Lam, S. K., Pitrou, A., & Seibert, S. 2015, in Proceedings
of the Second Workshop on the LLVM Compiler
Infrastructure in HPC, LLVM '15 (New York, NY, USA:
ACM), 7:1 -- 7:6.
http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2833157.2833162
Sorensen, C. M., Heinson, Y. W., Heinson, W. R.,
Maughan, J. B., & Chakrabarti, A. 2017, Atmosphere, 8,
68
Spergel, D., Gehrels, N., Breckinridge, J., et al. 2013, arXiv
e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.5422
sqlite3 Development Team. 2019, DB-API 2.0 interface for
Lee, G. K. H., Wood, K., Dobbs-Dixon, I., Rice, A., &
SQLite databases
Helling, C. 2017, A&A, 601, A22,
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629804
Sromovsky, L. A. 2005, Icarus, 173, 254,
doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2004.08.008
Line, M. R., Zhang, X., Vasisht, G., et al. 2012, ApJ, 749,
Sromovsky, L. A., Fry, P. M., Hammel, H. B., et al. 2009,
93, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/93
Icarus, 203, 265, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2009.04.015
Lupu, R. E., Marley, M. S., Lewis, N., et al. 2016, AJ, 152,
Stamnes, K., Tsay, S.-C., Jayaweera, K., & Wiscombe, W.
217, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/217
1988, ApOpt, 27, 2502, doi: 10.1364/AO.27.002502
MacDonald, R. J., Marley, M. S., Fortney, J. J., & Lewis,
STScI Development Team. 2013, pysynphot: Synthetic
N. K. 2018, ApJ, 858, 69, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabb05
Madhusudhan, N., & Burrows, A. 2012, ApJ, 747, 25,
photometry software package, Astrophysics Source Code
Library. http://ascl.net/1303.023
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/747/1/25
Sudarsky, D., Burrows, A., Hubeny, I., & Li, A. 2005, ApJ,
Madhusudhan, N., & Seager, S. 2009, ApJ, 707, 24,
627, 520, doi: 10.1086/430206
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/707/1/24
Thelen, A. E., Nixon, C. A., Chanover, N. J., et al. 2019,
Marley, M. S., Gelino, C., Stephens, D., Lunine, J. I., &
Icarus, 319, 417, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2018.09.023
Freedman, R. 1999, ApJ, 513, 879, doi: 10.1086/306881
Thomas, G. E., & Stamnes, K. 2002, Radiative Transfer in
Marley, M. S., & McKay, C. P. 1999, Icarus, 138, 268,
the Atmosphere and Ocean, 546
doi: 10.1006/icar.1998.6071
Marley, M. S., Seager, S., Saumon, D., et al. 2002, ApJ,
568, 335, doi: 10.1086/338800
Toon, O. B., McKay, C. P., Ackerman, T. P., &
Santhanam, K. 1989, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 16287,
doi: 10.1029/JD094iD13p16287
McKay, C. P., Pollack, J. B., & Courtin, R. 1989, Icarus,
Toon, O. B., Pollack, J. B., & Sagan, C. 1977, Icarus, 30,
80, 23, doi: 10.1016/0019-1035(89)90160-7
663, doi: 10.1016/0019-1035(77)90088-4
McKinney, W. 2010, in Proceedings of the 9th Python in
Valdes, F., Gupta, R., Rose, J. A., Singh, H. P., & Bell,
Science Conference, ed. S. van der Walt & J. Millman, 51
-- 56
D. J. 2004, ApJS, 152, 251, doi: 10.1086/386343
Villanueva, G. L., Smith, M. D., Protopapa, S., Faggi, S., &
Morley, C. V., Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., et al. 2012,
ApJ, 756, 172, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/172
Mandell, A. M. 2018, JQSRT, 217, 86,
doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2018.05.023
PICASO
17
Waldmann, I. P., Tinetti, G., Rocchetto, M., et al. 2015,
Yelle, R. V., Doose, L. R., Tomasko, M. G., & Strobel,
ApJ, 802, 107, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/802/2/107
Walt, S. v. d., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. 2011,
Computing in Science & Engineering, 13, 22
D. F. 1987, Geophys. Res. Lett., 14, 483,
doi: 10.1029/GL014i005p00483
Zhang, F., Liu, K., Yang, Q., Wu, K., & Zhao, J.-Q. 2017,
Webber, M. W., Lewis, N. K., Marley, M., et al. 2015, ApJ,
Advances in Meteorology, 2017
804, 94, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/94
Wiscombe, W. J. 1977, Journal of Atmospheric Sciences,
34, 1408, doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034(cid:104)1408:
TDMRYA(cid:105)2.0.CO;2
Zhang, M., Chachan, Y., Kempton, E. M.-R., & Knutson,
H. A. 2019, PASP, 131, 034501,
doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aaf5ad
18
Batalha et al.
APPENDIX
A. LIST OF ALL MODELING RECOMMENDATIONS
In §3 we explored PICASO's sensitivities to single scattering phase function, multiple scattering phase function, and
Raman scattering methodology. Throughout the text, we outlined our modeling suggestions. Here, we aggregate those
recommendations into a single table. In this version of PICASO, these represent the current radiative transfer defaults.
• Single Scattering:
-- Use default specification for direct scattering (TTHG Ray)
-- Fit for the functional form of the fraction, f , of forward to back scattering according to the problem being
addressed.
-- See Table 1 for a list of pros/cons
• Multiple Scattering:
-- For planet cases with some degree of asymmetric cloud scatterers, always use N=2 Legendre polynomial
expansion with the δ-Eddington correction.
• Raman Scattering:
-- Choose Pollack et al. methodology with Oklopci´c et al. (2016) cross sections.
-- Choose a stellar spectrum that matches the level of resolution needed
-- The user will experience slight compute speed losses for a single run depending largely on the stellar/planet
resolution chosen. However, because these shifts only need to be computed once, adding this Raman
scattering methodology is not a computational burden.
• Phase Geometry:
-- The default number of integration angles is 10 Gauss and 10 Chebyshev angles. If the user is particularly
interested in exploring scattering effects at high cosine angle (e.g. near planet limb), it would be beneficial
to increase the number of planet facets despite the decrease in computation speed.
B. OPACITY DATABASE
For this version of the code, PICASO contains a database of opacities that are hosted on Github. As summarized in
Freedman et al. (2008), our molecular opacities are computed on a 1060 point pressure-temperature grid from 0.3-1µm.
Currently this database contains molecular opacity from: CH4, CO2, CrH, FeH, H2O, H2S, K, Li, NH3, Na, Rb, TiO,
and VO. Notably, for CH4 we include the visible methane following Karkoschka (1994). For continuum absorption,
we include H bound-free, H free-free, H−
2 , H2-CH4, H2-H, H2-H2, H2-He, H2-N2. We also include Rayleigh scattering
from H2, He, and CH4, and Raman scattering from H2 (Oklopci´c et al. 2016).
Our opacity database is constructed in sqlite3 format. sqlite3 is a user-friendly, python-based module for the C-
library, SQLite. After testing several database formats (json, hdf5, ascii, sqlalchemy), SQLite was chosen because
it is a lightweight disk-based database that does not require a separate server process. Additionally, as we expand our
opacity database it will be trivial to port over this smaller SQLite database to another format that can handle much
larger data structures. We provide a full tutorial on how to query and construct sqlite3 databases5. If users follow
our recipe, they can swap in any molecular opacities without needing any code modifications.
5 /:Opacity Tutorial
|
1508.05207 | 1 | 1508 | 2015-08-21T08:32:11 | Observations of Comets C/2007 D1 (LINEAR), C/2007 D3 (LINEAR), C/2010 G3 (WISE), C/2010 S1 (LINEAR), and C/2012 K6 (McNaught) at large heliocentric distances | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | Photometric and spectroscopic observations of five nearly parabolic comets with eccentricity larger than 0.99 at heliocentric distances greater than 4 AU were performed. No molecular emission was observed for any studied comet and the entire cometary activity in all cases was attributed to dust production. Upper limits of the gas production rates for the main neutral molecules in the cometary comae were calculated. The derived values of dust apparent magnitudes were used to estimate the upper limit of the geometric cross-section of cometary nuclei (upper limits of radii range from 2 km to 28 km). Due to the poor sublimation of water ice at these distances from the Sun, other mechanisms triggering activity in comets are discussed. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | Observations of Comets C/2007 D1 (LINEAR), C/2007 D3 (LINEAR), C/2010 G3 (WISE),
C/2010 S1 (LINEAR), and C/2012 K6 (McNaught) at large heliocentric distances
Oleksandra Ivanova1,*, Luboš Neslušan2, Zuzana Seman Krišandová2,
Ján Svoreň2, Pavlo Korsun1, Viktor Afanasiev3,
Volodymyr Reshetnyk1,4, Maxim Andreev5,6
1- Main Astronomical Observatory of NAS of Ukraine, Akademika Zabolotnoho 27, 03680 Kyiv, Ukraine
*Corresponding Author. E-mail address: [email protected]
2Astronomical Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, SK-05960 Tatranská Lomnica, Slovak Republic
3 Special Astrophysical Observatory, RAS, 369167 Nizhnij Arkhyz, Russia
4Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 03022 Kyiv, Glushkova ave. 4, Ukraine
5International Center for Astronomical, Medical and Ecological Research, NAS of Ukraine, Akademika
Zabolotnoho 27, 03680 Kyiv, Ukraine
6Terskol Branch of the Institute of Astronomy of RAS - 81 Elbrus ave., ap. 33, Tyrnyauz Kabardino-Balkaria
Republic, 361623 Russian Federation
ABSTRACT
Photometric and spectroscopic observations of five nearly parabolic comets with eccentricity
larger than 0.99 at heliocentric distances greater than 4 AU were performed. No molecular
emission was observed for any studied comet and the entire cometary activity in all cases was
attributed to dust production. Upper limits of the gas production rates for the main neutral
molecules in the cometary comae were calculated. The derived values of dust apparent
magnitudes were used to estimate the upper limit of the geometric cross-section of cometary
nuclei (upper limits of radii range from 2 km to 28 km). Due to the poor sublimation of water
ice at these distances from the Sun, other mechanisms triggering activity in comets are
discussed.
Key words: Photometry; Spectroscopy; Comets, dust; Meteors.
Published in Icarus
1
1. Introduction
As already pointed out by Roemer (1962), bright comets are the basic source of our
knowledge about the physics of these celestial objects. The bright comets are mostly small
objects observed at relatively short heliocentric distances during their favourable
configuration relative to the Sun and the Earth. This fact means that the typical properties
derived for them are not necessarily identical with the properties of larger objects observed at
larger distances.
Progress in the development of the technologies of modern light detectors and a participation
of a number of large telescopes has led to a great increase in the number of observations of
distant comets with perihelion distances larger than 4 AU. Unfortunately, the studies of the
comets, which are active beyond the orbit of Jupiter, are episodic. Only a small number of
comets and centaurs active at large heliocentric distances have been studied (Korsun and
Chörny 2003; Bauer et al., 2003; Tozzi et al. 2003; Jewitt 2009; Lowry and Fitzsimmons, 2005;
Meech et al. 2009; Korsun et al. 2008, 2010; Mazzotta Epifani et al. 2010, 2014; Shi et al.
2014; Rousselot et al., 2014). Differences in the levels of activity, in the relative abundances of
dust and different coma morphologies have been observed. In addition, the differences
between the individual objects were large even for similar geometrical conditions.
Analysis of observations of distant comets allows us to study various physical mechanisms
triggering the activity at large heliocentric distances. To explain the cometary activity at large
heliocentric distances a few mechanisms (see, e.g., review by Meech and Svoren, 2004;
Gronkowski 2005) have been proposed. The most popular sources of the energy required to
explain the activity are: the sublimation of more volatile compounds like CO or CO2 (Houpis
and Mendis, 1981; Prialnik and Bar-Nun, 1992; Hughes, 1992), the transition phase between
amorphous and crystalline water ice (Prialnik, 1992; Gronkowski and Smela, 1998; De Sanctis
et al., 2002), polymerisation of HCN (Rettig et al., 1992), and the annealing of amorphous
water ice (Meech et al. 2009).
Observations of distant comets by different methods (e.g., photometry, spectroscopy, and
polarimetry) can be used to determine the sizes of cometary nuclei (Svoren, 1983), to study
the brightness evolution and dust composition of cometary comae (Meech et al., 2009), as
well as to detect gas emissions above the reflected solar continuum (Larson, 1980; Cochran et
al., 1980, 1982; Bockelée-Morvan et al., 2001; Rauer et al., 2003; Cook et al., 2005; Korsun et
al., 2006, 2008).
To enlarge the set of the comets studied at relatively large heliocentric distances, in Sects.
2 and 3 we describe the observations and their analysis five comets with perihelia near or,
mostly, beyond the snow line. The determined physical characteristics are given in related
tables and the relations between some parameters are shown in several figures. Observations
of the comets were performed utilizing the 6-meter telescope of the Special Astrophysical
Observatory and the 0.6-meter telescope of the Peak Terskol Observatory, both located in
Russia.
2
2. Observations and reduction
The data set of distant active comets presented in this paper was obtained within the period
from 2008 to 2014. The images and spectra were obtained during several observing runs at
two different sites: the Special Astrophysical Observatory (SAO RAS, Russia) and the Peak
Terskol Observatory. We obtained images and spectra for a number of comets within the
framework of a program of optical spectroscopic and photometric investigations of distant
active comets. Table 1 summarizes the data and the geometric circumstances at the times of
the observations. A general description of the comets and orbit planes is presented in Fig.1.
Table 1. Log of observations.
Object
Date, UT
C/2007 D1
(LINEAR)
C/2007 D3
(LINEAR)
C/2010 G3
(WISE)
C/2010 S1
(LINEAR)
2008-03-14
2008-12-04
2011-03-29
2011-11-25
C/2012 K6
(McNaught)
2014-02-13
2014-02-23
Exp.
Times
(s)
7×60
5×60
4×900
7×60
4×900
6×90
6×60
4×900
10×30
7×30
5×30
4×900
10×180
11×120
11×120
7×180
5×180
Orb.a
rb, AU
c, AU
Phase angle,
Filter/
Telescope
8.93
7.94
(º)
1.0
6.62
6.51
8.6
5.60
5.19
9.7
7.00
6.52
7.3
4.16
3.52
11.3
4.22
3.45
9.4
O
O
O
I
O
O
Spectrum
V
R
spectra
V
spectra
V
R
spectra
B
V
R
spectra
B
V
R
B
V
6-m, SCORPIO
6-m, SCORPIO
6-m SCORPIO-2
6-m, SCORPIO-2
0.6-m Zeiss
0.6-m Zeiss
aOrbital arc: I is inbound leg of orbit (pre-perihelion); O is outbound leg of orbit (post-perihelion)
b r is heliocentric distance
c Δ is geocentric distance.
Fig.1. The positions of a given comet for the observational dates. The summarized images of the comets obtained
with the filter R, celestial north (N), east (E), the motion (V) and sunward directions (S) are also shown. The scale
bar represents 5105 km perpendicular to the line of sight.
3
2.1 Observations at 6 m telescope of SAO RAS
The observations of comets C/2007 D1 (LINEAR), C/2007 D3 (LINEAR), C/2010 G3 (WISE)
and C/2010 S1 (LINEAR) were made with the 6 meter telescope of the Special Astrophysical
Observatory (SAO RAS). The heliocentric distances of the comets in the observation period
ranged from 4.22 AU to 8.93 AU. More detailed information about the observations of the
comets is given in Table 1. The observations were made using the universal SCORPIO and
SCORPIO-2 focal reducers mounted in the primary focus of the 6-m BTA telescope of the SAO
RAS (Afanasiev and Moiseev, 2011). We used the photometric and spectroscopic modes of the
focal reducers. An EEV 42-40 chip of 2048×2048 pixels was employed as the detector with the
reducer SCORPIO. The SCORPIO-2 device was used with a CCD radiation detector E2V 42–90.
The size of an image was 20482048 pixels. The image scale was 0.18 arcsec/pix and the full
field of view of the detectors was 6.16.1 arcmin.
We applied 22 and 21 binning to the photometric and spectroscopic frames respectively
during the observations. The reduction of the raw data including bias subtraction and flat-field
corrections was made. The telescope was tracked on the comet to compensate its apparent
motion during the exposure. The frames with morning sky were obtained to create the
averaged flat-field image for the photometric data, while a smoothed spectrum of an
the spectral data. We used routine sky
incandescent
(http://www.astro.washington.edu/docs/idl/cgi-bin/getpro/library01.html?SKY) of the
IDL
library (Goddard Space Flight Center) to calculate the sky background count (Landsman,
1993). Observed frames were cleaned from cosmic events. The recorded events were
removed automatically when we computed a composite image from the individual ones. For
this purpose, the robust routine of IDL library (http://www.astro.washington.edu/docs/idl/cgi-
bin/getpro/library30.html?ROBOMEAN) was applied to the stacked images.
lamp was observed
for
The spectroscopic data were obtained using the VPHG1200B grism (in 2008) and
VPHG940@600 grism (in 2011) in combination with a long, narrow-slit mask having
dimensions of 1.0′′ × 6.1′. The spectral resolution of the spectra was defined by the width of
the slit and was about 5 Å. The photometric data of the comets were obtained in Johnson-
Cousins broadband filters BVR. We obtained the observations in 2008 in a crowded field with
seeing being stable to about 1.8, while the observing conditions were much better in 2011
(seeing 1.3). All nights were photometric.
We observed the spectrophotometric standard stars BD+28d4211, HZ44, and GD108 (Oke,
1990) to make the absolute calibration of the observed spectra and photometry of the comets
at 6-m telescope SAO RAS. To perform an absolute flux calibration of the comet images
obtained at 0.6 m telescope of Peak Terskol Observatory, the field stars were used. The
background stars were identified on a comet image. We selected all bright stars as
photometric standards with the signal-to-noise ratio greater than 100. The stellar magnitudes
of the standard stars were taken from the catalog NOMAD (Zacharias, et al., 2005)
(http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR). We used the correspondence between instrumental
and catalogue magnitudes in each filter to derive the transformation coefficient from the
instrumental to the B, V, and R system. After studying the star in the field of view, we used for
our study only those standard stars, which were not variable. For each observed comet, we
obtained the integrated magnitude as a function of the aperture.
4
2.2 Observations at 0.6 m telescope of Peak Terskol Observatory
The comet C/2012 K6 (McNaught) was observed with the 60-cm Zeiss telescope of the
Peak Terskol Observatory (IC AMER) on February 13 and 23, 2014. We observed the comet
when it was at heliocentric distances 4.16 AU and 4.22 AU after its perihelion passage. A brief
summary of our observations of the comet is presented in Table 1.
The CCD SBIG STL 1001 camera was used as a detector. The size of the image was 1024
1024 pixels. The full field view of the CCD was 10.610.6 arcmin, and the image scale was 1.24
arcsec per pixel. The seeing was 1.9.
The photometric images of the comet were obtained in Johnson B, V, and R broad-band
filters centred at 4330 Å, 5450 Å, and 6460 Å, respectively. A binning of 22 was applied
during the observations. After applying the standard procedures of bias subtraction and flat-
fielding, all individual frames were stacked together and summed to increase the signal-to-
noise ratio.
3. Analysis of the results
3.1 Spectroscopy
To reduce the long-slit spectra observed with SCORPIO we used the package Scorpio2k.lib
developed at SAO RAN. The package enables making the basic photometric reductions, such
as bias removing, flat-fielding, geometry correction, and linearization of the scale along
dispersion. The night sky spectrum existing in the frames with the cometary spectra was
removed by measuring its level in each column over the zones that were free of the cometary
coma. The photometric calibration of the cometary spectra was made using observed spectra
of the spectrophotometric standard stars and spectral behavior of atmospheric extinction that
was taken from Kartasheva and Chunakova (1978). A median frame for each considered
comet was composed from a number of individual images with spectra. The last procedure
also eliminates cosmic rays. Since the observed spectra were obtained from the faint objects
we collapsed them in spatial direction to increase the signal-to-noise ratio of the spectra to be
analysed. To search for possible molecular emissions we need to remove continuum from the
observed spectra. In fitting the continuum we used a solar spectrum, which was taken from
Neckel and Labs (1984). Convolving the solar spectrum with the appropriate instrumental
profile we degraded it to the resolution of our observations. The proper spectral behavior was
gained multiplying the solar spectrum by a polynomial. The observed spectra and fitted
continua for the comets observed at SAO RAN are displayed in Fig. 2.
Published in Icarus
5
Fig. 2. Spectra of four distant comets. The spectra of C/2007 D1 (LINEAR), C/2007 D3 (LINEAR), C/2010 G3
(WISE), and C/2010 S1 (LINEAR) are shown in four frames. The observed spectra and superimposed fitted
continua are depicted in the upper panels of each frame. The results of subtraction of the calculated continua
from the observed spectra are depicted in the lower panels of each frame. The wavelength limits of the spectra
are defined by the grisms used and by the level of the detected signal. The dotted lines correspond to the ±3σ
levels of the residual data. The positions of the most intensive spectral lines of CN, C3, CO+, and C2, which are
typically seen in cometary, but not occurring in our spectra, are indicated at the upper border of each plot.
Subtracting the calculated continuum from the observed spectrum, we obtained a residual
signal, in which the potential emission features would be detected. The result of the
subtraction is also displayed in Fig. 2 (lower panels in the ABCD frames). The 3σ level was used
as a criterion to search for the emissions in the noisy residuals. The careful inspection of the
data shows that no regular feature exceeds the 3σ level. The data displayed in Fig.2 (lower
panels of frames C and D) with the values above the specified level do not show any regular
features. We consider it as noise that is determined at the low spectral sensitivity of the E2V
42–90 detector used in the blue wavelength region.
The polynomials used to fit the observed continua can also be used to measure the
reddening effect when the slit was oriented along the parallactic angle. In our cases the slit
direction deviated by 45°-103° relative to the mean parallactic angle and we do not make any
conclusions on the spectral reddening gradient.
We concluded that we have detected only the continuum and not detected any emission
in the spectra of four distant comets. A few spectra for distant comets (with q > 5 AU) were
6
published so far. The spectra of well-known periodic comet 29P/Schwassmann–Wachmann 1
show the CN and ionic emissions at distances of ~6 AU from the Sun (Cochran et al., 1980;
Cochran and Cochran, 1991). Ionic emissions were also detected in the spectra of the long
period comet C/2002 VQ94 (LINEAR) at the distance of 8.36 AU from the Sun (Korsun et al.,
2014). Nevertheless, no emission exceeding 3σ level was found in the spectra of comets
C/2003 WT42 (LINEAR) (Korsun et al., 2010) and C/2006 S3 (LONEOS) (Rousselot et al., 2014).
We calculated upper limits of the emission fluxes of CO+ and upper limits of the
production rates of the neutrals, which could be detected at large heliocentric distances. In
order to calculate the relative fluxes we used an approach similar to that presented by
Rousselot et al. (2014). The upper limits of the production rates of the neutrals were derived
using the Haser model (Haser, 1957). The model parameters for the neutrals were taken from
Langland-Shula and Smith (2011). G-factor for CN, which depends on the heliocentric velocity
of the comet, was taken from Schleicher (2010). The resulting upper limits are presented in
Table 2.
Table 2. Upper limits for the main molecules in the cometary comae.
Molecule
Central wavelength and
Amplitude=σ,
Flux,
spectral range, Å/Δλ
10-17 erg s-1 cm-2 Å-1
10-16 erg s-1 cm-2
Aperture,
l×h arcsec2
Gas production rate**,
1023 mol s-1
CN
C3
CO+
C2
C3
CO+
C2
C3
CO+
C2
CN
C3
CO+
C2
3870/62
4062/62
4266/64
5141/118
4062/62
4266/64
5141/118
4062/62
4266/64
5141/118
3870/62
4062/62
4266/64
5141/118
C/2007 D1 (LINEAR)
1.43
1.02
0.63
0.81
<0.77
<0.55
<0.34
<0.44
C/2007 D3 (LINEAR)
0.33
0.24
0.16
<0.18
<0.13
<0.09
C/2010 G3 (WISE)
1.50
0.74
0.15
<0.85
<0.42
<0.08
C/2010 S1 (LINEAR)
57.77
22.51
7.34
3.03
<31.51
<12.72
<4.15
<1.71
1×22
1×18
1×24
1×37
<15.62
<0.32
<5.87
<0.06
<0.64
<0.15
<0.27
<234.17*
<2.77
<7.36
* The high value of the gas production rate of CN is caused by the high level of noise within the examined
wavelength region.
** The gas production rates were calculated for an effective annular aperture with diameter of
,
where h and l are height and width of the slit respectively.
3.2 Photometry
All comets were observed at heliocentric distances larger than 4 AU. The spectral
observations of a majority of distant comets did not reveal molecular emissions seen above
the reflected solar continuum. We used broadband filters for the analysis of the cometary
dust environment. We obtained the magnitude using relation
7
πhl=D/4 , (1)
is the magnitude of the standard star;
where
and
are the measured fluxes of
the star and the comet in counts, respectively;
is the sky transparency that depends on
the wavelength, and
is the difference between the cometary and stellar air masses.
Because the field stars were used for calibration, the sky transparency is not taken into
account.
0º using equation
Absolute magnitudes of the comets were corrected to r = = 1 AU and phase angle α =
, (2)
where r and are, respectively, the heliocentric and geocentric distances of the comet (in
AU);
is R magnitude of the comet; is the phase angle of the comet (in degree); = 0.04 is
the linear phase coefficient in magnitudes per degree (Snodgrass et al., 2008). The results for
our comets are given in Table 3.
Table 3. Photometry, reduced magnitudes, and colors of the comets.
Comet
DATE, UT
r, AU
mR(1,1,0)
,
arcsec
C/2007
2008/03/14
8.93
D1(LINEAR)
C/2007 D3
(LINEAR)
2008/12/04
6.62
-
C/2010 G3
2011/03/29
5.6
(WISE)
C/2010 S1
(LINEAR)
2011/11/25
7.0
2014/02/13
4.16
C/2012 K6
(MgNaught)
2014/02/23
4.22
-
12.95±0.03
12.33±0.03
11.04±0.03
14.74±0.01
14.08±0.01
12.73±0.01
11.89±0.01
10.01±0.01
8.64±0.01
12.59±0.04
12.02±0.03
mc
a
19.36±0.08
19.10±0.08
18.57±0.08
20.89±0.07
20.68±0.06
20.29±0.05
20.36±0.07
20.09±0.07
19.59±0.06
16.90±0.08
16.59±0.07
15.99±0.05
17.63±0.08
17.44±0.07
17.79±0.08
17.65±0.07
Color index
BV*
-
-
-
0.62±0.11
0.58±0.10
0.64±0.09
0.63±0.14
0.62±0.13
0.78±0.14
0.75±0.13
VR*
0.59±0.09
0.57±0.09
0.46±0.09
-
0.61±0.07
0.61±0.07
0.56±0.06
0.49±0.08
0.48±0.07
0.46±0.06
0.60±0.09
0.59±0.08
-
1.8
2.2
3.3
1.8
2.2
3.3
1.8
2.2
3.3
1.8
2.2
3.3
6.2
7.5
6.2
7.5
a- magnitude of the comets obtained through V filter
*- estimated accuracy of determining the brightness of standard stars for catalogue NOMAD is about a few
hundredths of magnitude.
A majority of our comets exhibit low activity. To calculate their dust production rate,
we therefore used the method proposed by Jewitt (2009), which involves an estimate of the
apparent magnitude of the cometary dust coma in an annular aperture, in particular
8
MPmIImstscc ))(log(5.2)()(log5.2stm)(sI)(cI)(PMαβΔlog51,1,0)(rm=)(mRRRm (3)
where m1 and m2 are the magnitudes corresponding to the aperture radii ρ1 and ρ2; the values
of the latter were taken to be ρ1 =1.8 arcsec and ρ2=2.4 arcsec.
The apparent magnitude can be used to estimate the upper limit of the geometric
cross-section of a cometary nucleus (Russell, 1916; Jewitt, 1991). For this purpose, we used
the relation
where
is the geometric grain albedo for the given wavelength referring to the mix of
(4)
grain size;
geometrical cross-section of the nucleus in m2;
is the phase function dependence on phase angle
;
is the
is the magnitude of the Sun (the latter
being -26.09, -27.74, and -27.26 for the B, V, and R bands, respectively).
In our calculation we used the three values of the geometric albedo
. The first
adopted value
= 0.1 is related to the phase angle of the comets from the article by
Kolokolova et al. (2004). The second value
= 0.04 is often used for the similar study of
very distant comets (Meech et al., 2009). The third value
= 0.25 is the mean geometric
albedo, which was taked from the article by Gehrz and Ney (1992), who showed that the
albedo of some comets lies in the range of 0.1−0.3 on average.
To estimate the upper limit of the effective radius of the cometary nucleus, we used
relation
. The results are presented in Table 4 for the three values of the geometric
albedo.
Table 4. The apparent magnitude of coma and upper limit of the radius of the comet nucleus. Calculations
were made for three variants of mean geometric albedo: 0.04, 0.1, and 0.25.
Comet
Filter
C/2007 D1
(LINEAR)
C/2007 D3
(LINEAR)
C/2010 G3
(WISE)
C/2010 S1
(LINEAR)
C/2012 K6
(MgNaught)
R
V
R
R
R
V
a
md
20.4
22.5
21.4
18.9
18.9
19.9
Cd, [m2]
0.1
5.1108
0.04
1.3109
*
Rn
, [km]
0.25
2.0108
0.04
206
0.1
134
0.25
82
5.2106
2.1106
8.3106
42
31
21
1.2108
4.6107
1.9107
63
42
32
2.5109
1.0109
4.1108
287
185
113
3.2108
1.1108
1.3108
4.5107
5.1107
1.8107
<104
<63
<42
<62
<41
<31
a- coma magnitude in the projected annulus between 1 =1.78 arcsec and 2 =2.14 arcsec
*-
Limits are given where cometary coma was detected.
The parameter
(as a proxy for the dust production in the comet) was computed
using the formula (A’Hearn et al., 1984),
9
),1010log(5.2124.04.0mmdm,101025.2)()()(4.02222SUNdmmdrCp)(p4.010)(dCSUNm)(p)(p)(p)(p2NdRC , (5)
is the albedo;
is a filling factor, i.e., the ratio of the total cross section of grains; and ρ is
the linear radius of the field of view at the comet distance. The value
is typically
expressed in centimetres and is independent of the photometric aperture size. Our results are
presented in Fig.3.
Fig.3. Log(Af) values obtained for target comets (squares) as the function of heliocentric distance r compared to
the values derived for long period comets (asterisks), active centaurs (triangles) and JFC (crosses), which were
active at large heliocentric distances. To compare amoung the values, we used the results presented in the
papers by Lowry et al. (1999), Mazzotta Epifani et al. (2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2014), Meech et al.
(1990, 2009), Szabó et al. (2001; 2002; 2008), Korsun et al. (2010), Rousselot et al. (2014), Shubina et al. (2014),
Solontoi et al. (2012), Ivanova et al. (2014), Bauer et al. (2003) and Lara et al. (2003).
We used obtained
parameters for the comets to calculate the dust mass
production rate (Newburn and Spinrad, 1985; Weiler et l., 2003; Fink and Rubin, 2012). The
relation to estimate the dust productivity is given by
, (6)
where
is the grain density (Newburn and Spinrad, 1985), with
=3000 kgm-3,
=2200 kgm-3 and
=2 m;
is the differential particle size
distribution, where
is grain radius;
and
are minimal and maximal grain radii.
10
maxmin)()()3/4(3aadNMdaafaaQQ))/(()(210aaaad012a)(afaminamaxa We used the lower and upper limits of dust grain radii equal to 5 and 1000 μm, respectively,
based on the results obtained from the numerical modelling of dust environments of distant
comets (Fulle 1994; Korsun 2005, 2010; Mazzotta Epifani et al. 2009). For our estimations we
used two types of differential particle size distribution: in the simple form of f(a)a-4 (Korsun
et al., 2005; 2010) and more complex expression of f(a)
(Hanner, 1983).
For our calculation we fixed the parameters, whereby the minimum grain radius a0=5 m,
M=27 and N=4, which provide a peak of the function for a particle size of about 40 m.
The dust number rate is given by
,
(7)
where
is the ejection velocity of dust particle. We calculated the outflow dust velocity
based on the equation found by Sekanina et al. (1992). We used the parameters based on the
results obtained from numerical modeling of dust environment of some distant comets
(Korsun et al., 2010, 2014; Rousselot et al., 2014), which were observed at the similar
heliocentric distances as our comets. The calculated outflow velocities between 1 and 28 ms−1
are in agreement with the numerical modeling of dust environment of some other distant
active targets at the same heliocentric distances (Fulle, 1994; Mazzotta Epifani et al., 2009;
Korusn et al., 2010, 2014; Rousselot et al., 2014). The numerical values of dust mass
production are listed in Table 5.
Table 5. Dust mass production rate of the comets.
Comet
r, [AU]
, ms-1
p=0.25
p=0.1
QM, kgs-1
f(a)a-4
f(a)
f(a)a-4
f(a)
C/2007 D1
(LINEAR)
C/2007 D3
(LINEAR)
C/2010 G3
(WISE)
C/2010 S1
(LINEAR)
C/2012 K6
(MgNaught)
8.93
1-19
6.62
3-22
5.60
3-24
7.00
2-22
4.16
4.22
5-29
5-28
4
1
1
21
3
2
15
2
2
77
10
6
10
1
1
52
7
5
37
4
4
193
24
19
4. A discussion of the dust-production mechanisms
Our observations of comets at large heliocentric distances revealed the occurrence
of well-observable dust clouds near the cometary nuclei, but we did not detect any gas.
Below, we discuss some mechanisms, which could lead to this.
Common cometary activity at a relatively short heliocentric distance occurs mostly
due to a heating of the cometary surface by the solar radiation and subsequent sublimation of
11
NMaaaa001121maxmin))(/)(()()(2aaNdaavaafpAfQ)(av5μμ4,271000=a=N,=MaaaaNM5μμ4,271000=a=N,=MaaaaNM near surface water. At the large heliocentric distances, where the comets were observed, the
heating is not usually sufficient to support a continuous activity. However, it can likely cause
temporary eruptions of species like solid carbon monoxide or carbon dioxide, which are
volatile at relatively large heliocentric distances (Meech and Svoren, 2004). The outgassing
can eject a significant amount of dust from the surface. Further motion of dust grains can
subsequently be influenced by solar radiation.
Alternatively, temporary outgassing and subsequent lifting of dust grains could be
caused by a sudden release of internal energy, e.g. due to a phase change of amorphous ice,
which can be accompanied by a release of trapped gases (Jewitt, 2009).
Despite the fact that no gas was seen, we cannot exclude that the dust particles were
ejected to coma and tail by outgassing. Some molecules or ions could escape our detection.
For example, CO+, a potentially short-lived dissociation product, is weakly detectable in
wavelengths shorter than 430 nm. Or, outgassing could happen before time of observation.
Namely, we performed the spectroscopic observations of each of four comets only at a single
time. The molecules and atoms that move faster than dust grains could be meanwhile gone
and we only detected the dust grains, which have had not enough time to disperse. However,
an intriguing aspect of this explanation is the fact that we observed, four times for four
objects, only this stage of dust cloud without a gas. The most likely explanation is that at these
heliocentric distances any of the emissions from the gases responsible for the activity are
simply below detection limits, while the reflected solar continuum from the slowly moving
dust particles in the coma is detectable.
Another mechanism to eject the dust grains from the cometary surface are the impacts
of meteoroids, which blast the ejecta out of the cometary nucleus. The number density of
meteoroid particles in the interplanetary space is not generally very high. However, every
comet can move through the corridors of several meteoroid streams, in which the number
density is considerably higher. It could be estimated that tens to hundreds of 1-gram
meteoroid particles of a typical major stream can impact a comet nucleus during its passage
through the stream corridor. The impact velocity ranges from several to several tens of
kilometers per second, therefore the impact energy is quite high even if it is delivered by the
relatively small meteoroids.
We know only the streams crossing the orbit of our planet. Almost all major streams
have the parent body orbiting the Sun inside the stream corridor and the prevailing majority
of these parent bodies are periodic comets. Hence, we can expect a meteoroid stream around
the orbit of every periodic comet. If a given studied comet closely approaches the orbit of
periodic comet, we can assume that it also passes through the corridor of associated stream.
If all periodic comets were known, this assumption would enable us to estimate the number
of passages of a given studied comet through the stream corridors within an appropriate time
interval before the observation.
For the short-period comets 9P/Tempel 1 and 81P/Wild 2, there were found 110 and
129 approaches to the orbits of known periodic comets (Marsden and Williams, 2005) within
0.15 AU. Comet 1P/Halley approached such orbits 103 times (Ivanova et al., 2015).
Considering the same sample of known, cataloged comets, we however found only 2, 13, 4, 4,
and 23 approaches within 0.15 AU to the orbits of C/2007 D1, C/2007 D3, C/2010 G3, C/2010
S1, and C/2012 K6, respectively. These numbers are obviously incomplete with respect to the
12
lack of comet discoveries with the perihelia beyond the orbit of Earth (see, e.g., Neslušan,
2007, Fig. 4). Consequently, a direct evidence of the crossings of meteoroid streams and
meteoroid impacts is not possible to demonstrate and no reliable proof of the scenario that
the dust coma is created by the meteoroid impacts can be done.
Sometimes an evidence supporting the particular mechanism of dust production can
be gained from an image analysis showing the structure of coma and tail. Unfortunately, this
kind of analysis is problematic using our images of comets in large distances. As seen in Table
1, all observations of objects at large heliocentric and, thus, geocentric distance are,
necessarily, performed at a small phase angle (from 1.0º to 11.3º). Hence, we see a column of
coma and tail spanning over a large interval of distances from the nucleus and the structural
features, if present, are mutually over-covered. In an attempt to analyse the images, only
small variations of intensity were found. Since the magnitude of these variations was smaller
than the determination uncertainty, no information could be gained.
In conclusion, we cannot clearly discriminate between the mechanisms of activation of
the comets in large heliocentric distances, which we observed. To achieve progress, in the
future, we will need a sequence of precise observations covering a longer period to see the
evolution of the dust coma of each comet. With such observations, we could see if gas is
observed at a certain stage of the formation or evolution of the coma. If observations of
comets are performed when they are crossing the corridors of the well-known major streams,
in which the number density of meteoroids can be rather reliably estimated, this would help
to support or reject the meteoroid-impact hypothesis.
5. Results
(1) No gas emissions were detected in the spectra of four distant comets: C/2007 D1
(LINEAR), C/2007 D3 (LINEAR), C/2010 G3 (WISE), and C/2010 S1 (LINEAR). The upper
limits of the gas production rates for the main neutral molecules in the cometary
comae were calculated.
(2) The results of the photometric investigation of five distant comets presented here
show activity properties that are typical for new comets. The Afρ value obtained (Fig.3)
and the dust production (Tab. 5) for our objects are of the same order as those
measured for most of dynamically new and long period comets (Mazzotta Epifani et al.
2009; 2010; Meech et al. 2009; Szabó et al., 2001; 2002; 2008; Korsun et al., 2010;
Ivanova et al., 2014; Rousselot et al., 2008). Only comet C/2010 S1 (LINEAR) features a
higher level of the dust production rate than the other objects. Shubina et al. (2014)
estimated the comet dust production to be between 20 and 60 kg s−1 at the distance of
6.3 AU. The activity of the comet is similar to that of objects 29P/Schwassmann-
Wachmann 1 (Szabó et al., 2002) and 174P/Echeclus (Rousselot et al., 2013).
(3) Estimates of the upper limits of effective cometary radii yield the values (Tab. 4) that
are similar to those of a majority of comets (Lamy et al., 2004). Our results depend on
particular values of the albedo used for the calculations. We found the radii from 6 to
28 km, 4 to 13 km, and 3 to 8 km using albedo 0.04, 0.1, and 0.25, respectively.
13
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the Slovak Grant Agency VEGA (grants No. 2/0031/14 and
2/0032/14) and the implementation of the project SAIA. Grateful acknowledgement is made
to Dr. Lukyanyk for discussion and constructive criticism about programming methods under
the IDL. The results are based on the observations made with the 6-m telescope of SAO RAN
and the 60-cm Zeiss 600 telescope of the Peak Terskol Observatory (IC AMER).
References
1. Afanasiev, V.L., Moiseev, A.V., 2011. Scorpio on the 6 m Telescope: Current State and
Perspectives for Spectroscopy of Galactic and Extragalactic Objects. Baltic Astron. 20, 363-
370.
A’Hearn, M.F., Schleicher, D.G., Millis, R.L., Feldman, P.D., Thompson, D.T., 1984.
2.
Comet Bowell 1980b. Astron. J. 89, 579–591.
3. Bauer, J.M., Fernández, Y.R., Meech, K.J., 2003. An optical survey of the Active Centaur
C/NEAT (2001 T4). Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 115, 981-989.
4. Bockelée-Morvan, D., Lellouch, E., Biver, N., Paubert, G., Bauer, J., Colom, P., Lis, D. C.
2001. Search for CO gas in Pluto, Centaurs and Kuiper Belt objects at radio wavelengths.
Astron. Astrophys. 377, 1, 343-353.
5. Cochran, A.L, Barker, E.S., Cochran, W.D., 1980. Spectrophotometric observations of
29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1 during outburst. Astron. J. 85, 474–477.
Cochran, A.L, Cochran, W.D., Barker, E.S., 1982. Spectrophotometry of Comet
6.
Schwassmann-Wachmann 1. II – Its color and CO+ emission. Astrophys. J. 254, 816-822.
7. Cochran, A.L, Cochran, W.D., 1991. The first detection of CN and the distribution of CO+
gas in the coma of Comet P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1. Icarus. 90, 172–175.
8. Cook, J.C., Desch, S.J., Wyckoff, S., 2005. Visible and near infrared spectra of Comet
29P/Schwassmann–Wachmann 1. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 37, 645 (abstract).
9. De Sanctis, M.C., Capria, M.T., Coradini, A., 2002. Thermal evolution models of objects at
large heliocentric distance. In: Proceedings of Asteroids, Comets, Meteors – ACM 2002.
pp. 39–42.
10. Fink, U., Rubin, M., 2012. The calculation of Af and mass lost rate for comets. Icarus.
221, 721-734.
11. Fulle, M. 1994. Spin axis orientation of 2060 Chiron from dust coma modelling. Astron.
and Astrophys. 282, 980-988.
Gehrz, R. D., Ney, E. P., 1992. 0.7- to 23-micron photometric observations of P/Halley
12.
2986 III and six recent bright comets. Icarus. 100, 1, 162-186.
13. Gronkowski, P., 2005. The source of energy of the Comet 29P/Schwassmann– Wachmann
1 outburst activity: The test of the summary. Mon. Not. 360, 3, 1153–1161.
14. Gronkowski, P., Smela, J., 1998. The cometary outbursts at large heliocentric distances.
Astron. Astrophys. 338, 761–766.
15. Hanner, M.S., 1983. The nature of cometary dust from remote sensing. In: Gombosi, T. I.
(Ed.), Cometary exploration, vol. 2. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, 1-22.
14
16. Haser, L., 1957. Distribution d’intensite dans la tete d’une cometes. Bull. Soc. Roy. Sci.
Liege. 43, 740-750.
17. Houpis, H.L.F., Mendis, D.A., 1981. Dust emission from comets at large heliocentric
distances. I – The case of Comet Bowell/1980b. Moon Planets. 25, 397–412.
18. Hughes, D.W., 1992. Cometary nuclei. Astron. Now. 6, 7, 41–43.
19. Ivanova, O., Borysenko, S., Golovin, A., 2014. Photometry of Comet C/2011 L4
(PANSTARRS) at 4.4–4.2 AU heliocentric distances. Icarus. 227, 202-205.
20. Ivanova, O.V., Neslusan, L., Svoren, J., Seman Krisandova Z. 2015. Crater-diameter
distribution on comets 9P and 81P and potential meteoroid streams crossing their orbits.
Icarus. 254, 1, 92-101.
Jewitt, D.C., 1991. Cometary photometry. In: Comets in the post-Halley era. Kluwer,
21.
Dordrecht, Vol. 1, 19-65.
22. Jewitt, D. C., 2009. The active centaurs. Astrophys. J. 137, 4296–4312.
23. Kartasheva, T.A., Chunakova, N.M. 1978. Spectral atmospheric transparency at the Special
Astrophysical Observatory of the USSR Academy of Science from 1974 to 1976. Astrof.
Issled. Izv. Spets. Astr. Obs. 10, 44–51 (Rus.).
24. Kolokolova, L., Hanner, M.S., Levasseur-Regourd, A.-Ch., Gustafson, B.Å.S. 2004. Physical
properties of cometary dust from light scattering and thermal emission. In Comets II, eds.
M.C. Festou, H.U. Keller and H.A. Weaver, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 577-604.
25. Korsun, P.P., Chorny, G.F., 2003. Dust tail of the distant Comet C/1999 J2 (Skiff). Astron.
Astrophys. 410, 1029–1037.
26. Korsun, P. P., 2005. Distant activity of Comet C/2001 K5 (LINEAR). Kinem. Fiz. Neb. Tel 5,
Suppl. Ser., 465-472.
27. Korsun, P.P., Ivanova, O.V., Afanasiev, V.L., 2006. Cometary activity of distant object
C/2002 VQ94 (LINEAR). Astron. Astrophys. 459, 977–980.
28. Korsun, P.P.,
Ivanova, O.V., Afanasiev, V.L., 2008. C/2002 VQ94 (LINEAR) and
29P/Schwassmann–Wachmann 1 – CO+ and N2+ rich comets. Icarus. 198, 465–471.
29. Korsun, P.P., Kulyk, I.V., Ivanova, O.V., Afanasiev, V.L., Kugel, F., Rinner, C., Ivashchenko,
Yu.N. 2010. Dust tail of the active distant Comet C/2003 WT42 (LINEAR) studied with
photometric and spectroscopic observations. Icarus. 210, 916–929.
30. Korsun, P.P., Rousselot, P., Kulyk, I.V., Afanasiev, V L., Ivanova, O.V., 2014. Distant activity
of comet C/2002 VQ94 (LINEAR): optical spectrophotometric monitoring between 8.4 and
16.8 AU from the Sun. Icarus. 232, 88-96.
31. Lamy, P.L., Toth, I., Fernández, Y.R., Weaver, H.A., 2004. The sizes, shapes, albedos, and
colors of cometary nuclei. In: Comets II, M.C. Festou, H.U. Keller and H.A. Weaver,
University of Arizona Press, Tucson. 223-264.
32. Landsman, W.B., 1993. The IDL astronomy user’s library. A.S.P. Conference Series. 52,
246–248.
33. Langland-Shula, L.E., Smith, G.H., 2011. Comet classification with new methods for gas
and dust spectroscopy. Icarus. 213, 280-322.
34. Lara, L. M., J. Licandro, and G-P. Tozzi. 2009. Structures in the dust coma of comet C/1999
T1 (McNaught-Hartley) from Jan. 26 to Feb. 05, 2001. Astron. and Astrophys. 497. 3. 843-
846.
15
35. Larson, S., 1980. CO+ in Comet Schwassmann–Wachmann 1 near minimum brightness.
Astrophys. J. 238L, L47–L48.
36. Lowry, S.C., Fitzsimmons, A., 2005. William Herschel telescope observations of distant
comets. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 358, 641–650.
37. Marsden, B.G., Williams, G.V., 2005. Catalogue of Cometary Orbits, 16th ed., Smithsonian
Astrophys. Obs., Cambridge.
38. Mazzotta Epifani, E., Palumbo, P., Capria, M. T., Cremonese, G., Fulle, M., Colangeli, L.
2006). The dust coma of the active Centaur P/2004 A1 (LONEOS): a CO-driven
environment? Astron. and Astrophys. 46. 935-944.
39. Mazzotta Epifani, E., Palumbo, P., Capria, M. T., Cremonese, G., Fulle, M., Colangeli, L.
2007. The distant activity of short-period comets–I. MNRAS. 381. 713-722.
40. Mazzotta Epifani, E., Palumbo, P., Capria, M.T., Cremonese, G., Fulle, M., Colangeli, L.,
2009. The distant activity of the Long Period Comets C/2003 O1 (LINEAR) and C/2004 K1
(Catalina). Astron. Astrophys. 502, 355–365.
41. Mazzotta Epifani, E., Dall'Ora, M., di Fabrizio, L., Licandro, J., Palumbo, P., Colangeli, L.,
2010. The Activity of Comet C/2007 D1 (LINEAR) at 9.7 AU from the Sun. Astron.
Astrophys. 513, A33.
42. Mazzotta Epifani, E. M., Perna, D., Di Fabrizio, L., Dall’Ora, M., Palumbo, P., Snodgrass, C.,
Tozzi, G. P. 2014. Observational results for eight long-period comets observed far from
the Sun. Astron. Astrophys. 561, A6 (9 pp.).
43. Meech, K.J., Belton, M.J.S. 1990. The atmosphere of 2060 Chiron. Astron. J. 100. 1323-
1338.
44. Meech, K.J., Pittichova, J., Bar-Nun, A., Notesco, J., Laufer, D., Hainaut, O.R., Lowry, S.C.,
Yeomans, D.K., Pitts, M., 2009. Activity of comets at large heliocentric distances pre-
perihelion. Icarus. 201, 719–739.
45. Meech, K. J., and J. Svoren. 2004. Using Cometary Activity to Trace the Physical and
Chemical Evolution of Cometary Nuclei. Comets II. 317-335.
46. Neckel, H., Labs, D., 1984. The solar radiation between 3300 and 12500 Ǻ. Sol. Phys. 90,
205–258.
47. Neslušan, L., 2007. The fading problem and the population of the Oort cloud. Astron.
Astrophys. 461, 741-750.
48. Newburn, R. L., Spinrad, H. 1985. Spectrophotometry of seventeen comets. II-The
continuum. The Astron. J. 90, 2591-2608.
49. Oke, J.B., 1990. Faint spectrophotometric standard stars. Astron. J. 99, 1621–1631.
50. Prialnik, D., 1992. Crystallization, sublimation, and gas release in the interior of a porous
comet nucleus. Astrophys. J. 388, 196–202.
51. Prialnik, D., Bar-Nun, A., 1992. Crystallization of amorphous ice as the cause of Comet
P/Halley’s outburst at 14 AU. Astron. Astrophys. 258, 2, L9–L12.
52. Rettig, T.W., Tegler, S.C., Pasto, D.J., Mumma, M.J., 1992. Comet outbursts and polymers
of HCN. Astrophys. J. 398, 1, 293–298.
53. Rauer, H., Helbert, J., Arpigny, C., Benkhoff, J., Bockelée-Morvan, D., Boehnhardt, H.,
Thomas, N. 2003. Long-term optical spectrophotometric monitoring of comet C/1995 O1
(Hale-Bopp). Astron. Astrophys. 397, 3, 1109-1122.
16
54. Roemer, E., 1962. Activity in comets at large heliocentric distance. Publ. Astron. Soc.
Pacific. 74, 351-365.
55. Rousselot, P. 2008. 174P/Echeclus: a strange case of outburst. Astron. Astrophys. 480,
543-550.
56. Rousselot, P., Korsun, P.P., Kulyk, I.V., Afanasiev, V.L., Ivanova, O.V., Sergeev, A.V., and
Velichko, S.F. 2014. Monitoring of the cometary activity of distant comet C/2006 S3
(LONEOS). Astron. Astrophys. 480, A73.
57. Russel, H.N., 1916. On the Albedo of the Planets and their Satellites. Astrophys. J. 43, 173-
196.
58. Schleicher, D.G., 2010. The Fluorescence Efficiencies of the CN Violet Bands in Comets.
Astron. J. 140, 973-984.
59. Shi, J. C., Y. H. Ma, J. Q. Zheng. 2014. CCD photometry of distant active comets
228P/LINEAR, C/2006 S3 (LONEOS) and 29P/Schwassmann–Wachmann 1. Monthly Not.
Roy. Astron. 441, 1, 739-744.
60. Shubina, O., Kulyk, I., Korsun, P., Romanjuk, Y. 2014. Photometry of distant active comet
C/2010 S1 (LINEAR). Advances in Astronomy and Space Phys. 4, 38-41.
61. Sekanina, Z., Larson, S.M., Hainaut, O., Smette, A., West, R.M., 1992. Major outburst of
periodic comet Halley at a heliocentric distance of 14 au. Astron. Astrophys. 263, 367–
386.
62. Snodgrass C., Lowry S. C., Fitzsimmons A., 2008. Optical observations of 23 distant Jupiter
Family Comets, including 36P/Whipple at multiple phase angles. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.
385, 737–756.
63. Solontoi, M., Ivezid, Ž., Jurid, M., Becker, A. C., Jones, L., West, A. A., ... & Schneider, D. P.
2012). Ensemble properties of comets in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey.Icarus. 218. 571-584.
64. Svoren, J., 1983. Maximum sizes of cometary nuclei. In: Cometary Exploration I., ed.
T.I.Gombosi, Inst. for Physics, Budapest. 31-37.
65. Szabó, Gy.M., Csák, B., Sárneczky, K., Kiss, L.L., 2001. Photometric observations of distant
active comets. Astron. Astrophys. 374, 712–718.
66. Szabó, Gy.M., Kiss, L.L., Sárneczky, K., Sziládi, K., 2002. Spectrophoto-metry and structural
analysis of 5 comets. Astron. Astrophys. 384, 702-710.
67. Szabó, Gy.M., Kiss, L.L., Sárneczky. K., 2008. Cometary activity at 25.7 AU: Hale-Bopp 11
years after perihelion. Astrophys. J. Let. 677, 2, L121.
68. Tozzi, G.P., Boehnhardt, H., Curto, G. 2003. Imaging and spectroscopy of comet C/2001
Q4 (NEAT) at 8.6 AU from the Sun. Astron. Astrophys. 398, L41-L44.
69. Weiler, M., Rauer, H., Knollenberg, J., Jorda, L., Helbert, J. 2003. The dust activity of comet
C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp) between 3 AU and 13 AU from the Sun. Astron. Astrophys. 403,
313-322.
70. Zacharias, N., Monet, D. G., Levine, S. E., Urban, S. E., Gaume, R., Wycoff, G. L. 2005. The
Naval Observatory Merged Astrometric Dataset (NOMAD). In American Astronomical
Society 205th Meeting.
17
|
0907.4806 | 1 | 0907 | 2009-07-28T00:31:27 | That's the way the comet crumbles: Splitting Jupiter-family comets | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | Our current understanding of split, Jupiter-family comets is reviewed. The focus is on what recent studies of comets have told us about the nature of the splitting phenomenon. The goal is to not repeat the information given in recent reviews of split comets, but to build upon it. In particular, we discuss comets that have suffered splitting or fragmentation events in the past few years. These include comets (a) 57P/du Toit-Neujmin-Delporte, observed with a long train of fragments in 2002; (b) 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3, which split in 1995 and was extensively studied during its relatively close passage to Earth in 2006, during which dozens of fragments were discovered and studied; and (c) 174P/Echeclus, a Centaur and potentially future JFC, which split in late 2005 and was the first such Centaur observed to do so. We also discuss recent observations by SOHO of split comets that are likely of short-period. The Spitzer Space Telescope has observed many JFCs and provided us with unprecedented detailed views of cometary debris trails, which may be thought of as a middle ground between "normal" ejection of micron-sized dust grains and the cleaving off of meter-to-kilometer sized fragments. We will also discuss potential breakthroughs in studying splitting JFCs that may come from future surveys. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | That's the Way the Comet Crumbles:
Splitting Jupiter-Family Comets
Yanga R. Fern´andez ∗
University of Central Florida, Department of Physics, 4000 Central Florida Blvd.,
Orlando, FL 32816-2385 U.S.A.
Abstract
Our current understanding of split, Jupiter-family comets is reviewed. The focus
is on what recent studies of comets have told us about the nature of the splitting
phenomenon. The goal is to not repeat the information given in recent reviews of
split comets, but to build upon it. In particular, we discuss comets that have suffered
splitting or fragmentation events in the past few years. These include comets (a)
57P/du Toit-Neujmin-Delporte, observed with a long train of fragments in 2002; (b)
73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3, which split in 1995 and was extensively studied
during its relatively close passage to Earth in 2006, during which dozens of fragments
were discovered and studied; and (c) 174P/Echeclus, a Centaur and potentially
future JFC, which split in late 2005 and was the first such Centaur observed to do
so. We also discuss recent observations by SOHO of split comets that are likely of
short-period. The Spitzer Space Telescope has observed many JFCs and provided us
with unprecedented detailed views of cometary debris trails, which may be thought
of as a middle ground between "normal" ejection of micron-sized dust grains and
the cleaving off of meter-to-kilometer sized fragments. We will also discuss potential
breakthroughs in studying splitting JFCs that may come from future surveys.
Key words:
comets -- splitting, comets -- individual (57P, 73P, 174P), comets -- evolution
PACS: 96.30.Cw, 96.30.C-
9
0
0
2
l
u
J
8
2
.
]
P
E
h
p
-
o
r
t
s
a
[
1
v
6
0
8
4
.
7
0
9
0
:
v
i
X
r
a
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 407 8236939; fax: +1 407 8235112.
Email address: [email protected] (Yanga R. Fern´andez).
Article published in Planetary & Space Science 57 (2018) 1218 -- 1227
1
Introduction
The "typical" Jupiter-family comet (JFC) loses mass through a relatively
slow process of volatile sublimation and dust entrainment. Common mass loss
rates when a JFC is near perihelion are roughly ∼ 101−3 kg/s (A'Hearn et al.,
1995), depending on the size of the nucleus's "active area." This indicates that
nominally the cometary nucleus could disintegrate away probably only after
thousands of orbits around the Sun. This end-state of a JFC has never been
directly observed, although such very tiny comets (meters in diameter) that
are about to disintegrate would be difficult to discover. In any case current
thinking (e.g. Meech and Svoren, 2004) holds that most JFCs end their lives
either by plunging into the Sun, colliding with a planet, simply turning off
and becoming asteroid-like, or by catastrophic fragmentation.
This review will focus on this last option and its attendant large mass loss rate.
The primary motivation for studying split comets is that they are laboratories
for understanding cometary structure and bulk mechanical properties. Since
this can give us clues about how comets are put together, split comets can be
an important window for investigating the details of planetary formation and
specifically the accretion of solids into icy planetesimals. As mentioned above,
split comets also represent an aspect of cometary evolution. Since split comets
expose previously buried material to the space environment and thus to our
telescopes, they give us a way to probe chemical and thermophysical changes
in cometary nuclei.
In this paper, recent developments in our understanding of split comets will be
discussed. An excellent recent review of this topic is provided by Boehnhardt
(2004), and there have been several likewise good reviews before that (e.g.
Sekanina, 1982; Hughes and McBride, 1992; Sekanina, 1997; Boehnhardt, 2002).
The goal of this paper is to not duplicate that earlier work but rather to pro-
vide updates on work occuring in the interim.
2 Observational Aspects of Splitting
Conceptually, the question of "how do you know when a comet has split?" is
easy to answer. The observational manifestation of a splitting is a condensation
that appears away from the head of the comet but moving with very nearly the
same proper motion. However not all near-nuclear condensations are actually
indicative of a split; the condensation may or may not hold a solid body and
may be simply (e.g.) a trick of perspective on jet features in the coma, or a
clump of dust from an outburst. The overall dust production rate and the
complexity of coma morphology can make the actual identification of a real
2
splitting problematic. In particular, a splitting is often associated with an
outburst or a brightening, potentially making it even more difficult to identify
a fragment.
Interestingly, a fragment may not appear even when a comet brightens dra-
matically. For example comet 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1 has frequent
outbursts (see, e.g., Jewitt, 1990), yet no fragment has ever been seen.
On the other hand a comet that appears perfectly "typical" could have had a
recent splitting, but the fragments may be more than a few arcminutes from
the head, i.e. beyond the field-of-view of a typical CCD camera. Due to spo-
radic monitoring of most comets, a fragment will not always be seen in the
near-nuclear region; it may not be discovered until well after the split, as was
the case for fragment B of 57P/du Toit-Neujmin-Delporte (Marsden, 2002a),
which was found 0.2◦ away from fragment A, the comet's main head. The
even more extreme case is the paternity of comets 42P/Neujmin 3 (discov-
ered in 1929) and 53P/van Biesbroeck (discovered in 1954), which were found
(Carusi et al., 1985) to be pieces of one comet that split after a close approach
to Jupiter in 1850.
Another problem in determining whether a split has happened is simply faint-
ness. A 50-meter radius bare nucleus that is 2.0 AU from the Sun and 1.0
AU from Earth -- all reasonable numbers for a cometary fragment -- will have
an R-band magnitude of about 25 (for a geometric albedo of 0.04), which is
beyond the reach of many facilities. Even when such a fragment is actively
outgassing and thus brighter, the observation itself may not be done in such
a way as to detect the fragment.
All this makes determining the frequency of fragmentation among JFCs rela-
tively difficult to measure. A list of published instances of JFC fragmentation
is give in Table 1, but since many comets have long intervals (months or years)
where no observations are obtained by either professionals or amateurs, this
is naturally a lower limit of the true roster. Hughes and McBride (1992) esti-
mated that a JFC has 0.3% chance of splitting per perihelion passage, based
on the historical record of observed fragmentations. Chen and Jewitt (1994)
observed a sample of 34 JFCs with CCDs in the late 1980s and early 1990s,
and found 2 had split, corresponding to a ∼1% chance of a JFC splitting per
year. If these are accurate estimates of the splitting rate, one remarkable con-
sequence is that over the course of the ∼ 103 orbits that a typical JFC will be
active (Levison and Duncan, 1997), it can expect to split perhaps dozens to
hundreds of times. As noted by Chen and Jewitt (1994), while JFC splittings
may be perceived as being rarer than splittings by near-isotropic comets, a
given JFC will shed fragments many times during its active life.
This finding suggests that the shape and rotation state of a JFC is intimately
3
tied to the specific fragmentation events it has suffered, since the amount
of mass coming off in a fragment can be significant compared to the total
mass lost by normal outgassing in the course of an orbit. Suppose a JFC with
perihelion at 1 AU and aphelion at 5.2 AU (Jupiter's distance) has a mass
loss that is 200 kg/s at perihelion and is proportional to the inverse-square of
heliocentric distance. This comet will lose about 4 × 109 kg in one orbit. If the
effective radius of the nucleus is 2 km, and the density is about 400 kg/m3,
that is just 0.03% of the comet's total mass. If the comet is "active" over 10%
of its surface, the mass loss from those active areas erodes about 2 m deep.
If an equivalent mass were to come off as a spherical fragment, however, the
fragment would be 130 m in radius. This is a reasonable size for a "typical"
fragment of a JFC (Boehnhardt, 2004). Such a splitting would represent a
significant change in gravitational field, angular momentum, and topography.
As mentioned earlier, we have not discovered a population of very tiny comets.
We do not have observational evidence of a population of deka- or hectometer
sized JFCs that could be made up of fragments. The discovery biases almost
certainly play a role in this, although, as Meech et al. (2004) showed, if one
accounts for the biases it seems that the JFC size distribution really does fall
off below ∼1 km. In other words if the JFC size distribution were a power-law,
we should have discovered more comets smaller than 1 km than we actually
have. This suggests that most deka- or hectometer sized JFC fragments will not
stay as coherent bodies for long (years to decades) but eventually disintegrate.
In any case, directed, deep searches for smaller JFCs would be useful so that
we could directly address this problem with as little observational bias as
possible. In particular, a search that covers the projected orbits of several
JFCs would put constraints on the lifetimes of the fragments. For example, in
Fig. 1 we show a Spitzer Space Telescope mosaic of the vicinity of comet
73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 in May 2006. Approximately three dozen
fragments can be seen; how many will survive to the comet's next perihelion
in 2011? (We discuss this comet further in §4.2.)
3 Causes of Splitting
While tidal disruption as a mechanism for splitting comets is well understood,
it is responsible for only a small fraction of observed splits. Briefly, a comet
passing close enough to a planet (usually Jupiter) or the Sun will feel dif-
ferent gravitational forces on one end of its nucleus compared to the other.
The difference in forces can be strong enough to overcome the body's cohe-
sion. The extremely low tensile strength and high porosity of cometary nuclei,
as suggested most recently by the Deep Impact visit to comet 9P/Tempel
1 (Ernst and Schultz, 2007; Holsapple and Housen, 2007; A'Hearn, 2008), in-
4
dicate that a tidal force need not be that strong to successfully rip a comet
apart. However, in only one case -- comet D/1993 F2 (Shoemaker-Levy 9) -- are
we very sure that tidal disruption is the cause of the fragmentation. Comet
16P/Brooks 2 probably also suffered this fate but it was not discovered until
a few years after the purported close-approach.
For all the other comets in Table 1, tidal disruption could not have been the
cause of the split. In these cases, we are no closer to understanding why a
particular comet splits when it does than we were when Boehnhardt (2004)
wrote his review. He gives four other methods that could cause splitting: by
fast rotation, by thermal stress, by internal gas pressure, and by impacts.
Since that review was written, our understanding of the thermal properties
of cometary nuclei has improved as a result of the Deep Impact experiment.
For example there is stronger evidence now that the thermal conductivity
of cometary nuclei is extremely low (Sunshine et al., 2007; Groussin et al.,
2007), so low that the thermal pulse can penetrate only a few centimeters due
to diurnal heating. This means that on diurnal time scales thermal energy
may not be transported effectively into the comet's interior any faster than
the surface can itself be excavated by normal cometary activity. The existence
of abundant CO2 -- with its low sublimation temperature -- in P/Tempel 1's
coma (Feaga et al., 2007) also indicates that the comet could not have been
entirely baked out. Of course these are results for just one comet, but if they
are indicative of the "average" thermal properties of a JFC, then perhaps it
may be less likely for JFCs to split as a result of thermal stress. On the other
hand, the low strength of a JFC means that one can conceive of localized
structures (e.g. sheer cliffs in depressions or concentrations of less porous rock)
where thermal stress in just a small volume could cause a much bigger volume
to break off. This relates to more fundamental questions of nucleus structure
about which we do not yet have much data. How well are the volatiles and
refractories mixed within the nucleus? Is the high porosity manifest in micro-
or macro- scales? How common is significant topography?
4 Recent Results
4.1 Comet 57P/du Toit-Neujmin-Delporte
Fragment B was discovered in July 2002 well away from the main part of the
comet. Soon after, we (Fernandez et al., 2002) discovered eighteen more frag-
ments (named "C" through "T") along the line of variation (the projected
orbital path) and extending out 27 arcminutes from the comet's head. A mon-
tage of these individual fragments as seen on UT July 17 is shown in Fig.
2, along with a plot of the fragments' positions. The fragments had varying
5
brightnesses ranging from 20 to 23.5 mag in R-band. They also had widely
varying degrees of condensation; some fragments were nothing more than blobs
of dust with no central source, such as I and P. All fragments seemed to be
actively outgassing, though with apparently varying production rates.
Interestingly, there was no outburst in 2002 associated with this shedding of
mass. There was a significant outburst at the previous apparition, in 1996,
when the comet was observed to be about 5 mag brighter than expected.
However dynamical analysis of the largest fragments by Sekanina and Chodas
(2002) suggests that they could not have broken off six years earlier.
The fragments must represent a significant fraction of the comet's total mass.
How much mass, and what fraction is it? The size of the nucleus before frag-
mentation is unknown, but Lowry and Fitzsimmons (2001) derived an upper
limit to the radius of 1.1 km. So for an assumed density of 400 kg/m3, the
upper limit to total mass would be approximately ∼ 2 × 1012 kg. The activity
of the fragments makes their size estimation problematic, so a mass estimate is
even more difficult. However we can make an order-of-magnitude analysis. For
example, fragment G had an R-band magnitude of about 22.5, which at the
distance of 57P at the time, would correspond to a solid body with effective
radius of about 130 meters. Such a body alone would be ∼0.1% of 57P's total
mass. This is an overestimate for this particular fragment since cometary dust
contributes to the magnitude, but there are a few fragments that are likely
much bigger than G, so this is a reasonable order-of-magnitude estimate of
57P's mass loss.
A slightly more sophisticated analysis would be to naıvely convert all 19
fragment magnitudes to sizes, and thus create a cumulative size distribution
(CSD). One finds that such a distribution is fairly shallow, with N(> R),
the number of objects with radius bigger than R, proportional to only R−1.3.
While this totally ignores the obvious activity of the fragments, if activity
scales roughly with the fragment's surface area, the power-law slope of the
size distribution will be unaffected. This slope means that the total mass m
contained in fragments up to some size cutoff R0 is proportional to R1.7
0 . This
suggests that much of the fragmented mass is in the largest pieces such as B,
E, and F.
Interestingly, the CSD slope is shallower than that of large dust grains found in
JFC trails, as measured by Reach et al. (2007a). They found N(> R) ∝ R−2.3
for grains over 0.25 mm. Whether this is a clue as to the physical mechanism
behind fragmentation remains to be studied.
The real significance of the discovery of the train behind 57P is that it was the
first time so many fragments had been observed around a surviving, non-tidally
disrupted comet. Other comets have had as many fragments but only while
6
being completely broken apart or after passage by Jupiter or the Sun (e.g.,
comet C/1999 S4 (LINEAR), comet D/1993 F2 (Shoemaker-Levy 9), and
the Kreutz sungrazers). It motivates the question of whether shedding events
happen more frequently than thought and are just being missed due to the
extreme faintness of the fragments. Indeed, the sheer length of 57P's train
suggests that there were several fragmentation episodes in the past. If a JFC
loses only fragments of magnitude 23, 24, or fainter, only deep imaging of the
comet during the course of monitoring will reveal them.
The case of 57P also raises questions about the endurance of the smallest
fragments. Sekanina and Chodas (2002) state that fragment F would have left
the primary nucleus -- i.e. fragment A -- about 14 months before the discovery
observation; at discovery, F was 6 arcmin from Fragment A. They predicted
the future motion of fragment F based on this model, but unfortunately ap-
parently little if any data could be obtained by observers to corroborate or
refute the hypothesis. However, if true, it suggests that large fragments farther
down the train could have been released at even earlier times. Fragment T is
27 arcminutes from fragment A -- 4.5 times farther than fragment F. T could
have left the main nucleus (on its own or as part of another fragment) years in
the past. This would not necessarily be unprecedented, since as Boehnhardt
(2004) notes JFC fragments can have long endurance (hundreds of days), and
there is indication that JFCs can split most anywhere along their orbit. The
estimation of the endurance of fragment T would also depend on at what rela-
tive speed it left the nucleus. In any case, fragment T is a fairly small fragment:
could it have survived for years, and are we just now seeing the end of its life?
Is it really persistent despite its small size? It is also possible that fragment
T is a subfragment of a brighter fragment, say fragment S. Even so, the dis-
tance between S and T is appreciable (3.2 arcmin) and suggests an endurance
for T of several months despite its small apparent size. Beech and Nikolova
(2001) have modeled the survival times of fragments and show that small,
clean icy fragments can survive for months after separation, although whether
or not fragment T can be clean "enough," is uncertain. The images in Fig. 2
show cometary dust, not gas, and so there must be some "dirtiness" to the
fragments, which would shorten their lives (Hanner et al., 1981; Lien, 1990).
The faintness of the fragments, and then later the fact that the comet was post
perihelion and at unfavorable elongation, prevented detailed follow up. The
endurance of the the fragments was not directly measured. Therefore further
observations of the fragments and of the main comet itself at future apparitions
would be extremely useful to understand how this comet is evolving.
7
4.2 Comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3
One of the most-widely observed split comets since D/Shoemaker-Levy 9 has
been 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3, which first split in 1995 and approached
to within 0.07 AU of Earth in May 2006. This recent visit was a monumentally
important apparition scientifically since it would allow us detailed studies of
bright and relatively-fresh fragments -- fragments whose ices had formerly been
deeply embedded within the comet's nucleus but were now exposed to sunlight.
In a way, it was similar to the Deep Impact experiment in that 73P provided
us with a close-up view of subsurface pristine cometary material.
A review of this comet's behavior was given by Boehnhardt et al. (2002) and
by Sekanina (2007), which we briefly summarize here. This comet split into
several fragments in 1995, some of which deactivated or disintegrated before
the apparition was over. At the comet's next apparition in 2000 and 2001,
two of the 1995 fragments, B and C (the primary part of the comet), were
recovered, and two new fragments, E and F, were confirmed (although appar-
ently E broke off from C during the previous orbit). F disappeared later in the
apparition but the stage was thus set for the 2006 apparition: would B and C
survive another perihelion passage? Would E have survived? Would there be
a train of even more fragments?
The result was that in April and May 2006 over 60 fragments were found
-- including B and C but not E. The proximity to Earth certainly helped; a
fragment of the same size as 57P-G (mentioned in the last subsection) would
be about 3 mag brighter at 73P's geocentric distance. In any case some of
the fragments were very short-lived, lasting for only a few days. Amateur
astronomers contributed greatly to the census of fragments, in fact even finding
fragments that disappeared within a day and so could not be followed up and
formally named. Lists of the fragments and relevant info have been compiled
by Sekanina (2007) and Birtwhistle (2008), and the former also discusses some
preliminary work on describing the cascading fragmentation.
One of the many spectacular images from this apparition is shown in Fig. 3,
which comes from the Hubble Space Telescope. Fragment B was a dynamic
and rapidly changing fragment for much of the apparition, and this image
epitomizes this. It shows several subfragments (a.k.a. "mini-comets") tailward
of fragment B itself. These pieces are probably dekameter in scale, and a
sequence of images from HST show these fragments moving down the tail,
outgassing until they disintegrate away in timescales of only hours or days. The
image field-of-view is only about 25 arcseconds. A wider scale picture is shown
in Fig. 1, covering almost 5 degrees of sky along the comet's orbital path. The
dynamics of the small fragments in Figs. 1 and 3 have been analyzed by
Reach et al. (2007b), who found that the HST fragments are strongly affected
8
by the non-gravitational reaction force due to outgassing -- suggesting a high
volatile content. On the other hand, the "meteoroids" in the Spitzer image are
moving as would be expected simply from radiation pressure and solar gravity
-- suggesting a low volatile content. This perhaps could be explained as an
evolutionary effect, where the HST fragments dry out to become the Spitzer
fragments. This does require that the HST fragments would have to have
sufficient size and sufficiently low rock-to-ice ratio to be able to survive for the
several days that they are seen in the HST data. Unfortunately, identifying the
fragments seen by HST on April 18 with some part of the extended emission
seen in the Spitzer mosaic on May 4 would be problematic since the spatial
resolutions are so different and the time gap is so large.
The variability of fragment B is in stark contrast to fragment C, the primary
fragment (Sekanina, 2007). That fragment remained relatively stable, with
only slowly varying activity, nowhere near the frequency and amplitude of
changes seen from night-to-night (and sometimes within a night) in fragment
B. The two fragments must be roughly comparable in size, yet the specifics
of B's shape and the location of its volatiles has made apparently a huge
difference in the evolution.
Many observations of comet 73P were obtained during its apparition, and anal-
ysis on these rich datasets continue. We summarize here some of the exciting
results and apologize for oversights.
Arguably some of the most important findings involve the composition. Over-
all, 73P seems to be depleted in CH3OH, C2H6, and C2H2, but has "typical"
abundance of HCN (Villanueva et al., 2006; DiSanti et al., 2007; Kobayashi et al.,
2007). This means that this ecliptic comet that came from the trans-neptunian
region is compositionally similar to C/1999 S4 (LINEAR), a carbon-chain
depleted Oort Cloud comet (DiSanti and Mumma, 2008). Furthermore it is
unlike its fellow ecliptic comet 9P/Tempel 1 (DiSanti and Mumma, 2008).
This matching of compositions across dynamical classes hints that there was
sufficient mixing in the protoplanetary disk to allow individual icy planetesi-
mals to accrete material from various regions. In other words perhaps there is
not necessarily a compositional distinction that exactly matches the dynam-
ical distinction of ecliptic comets forming beyond Neptune and Oort Cloud
comets forming among the giant planets. Alternately, there could simply be
interlopers polluting the dynamical groups. In particular, we are only now
starting to build up a statistically significant sample of the parent-molecule
composition of JFCs (Mumma, 2008) to build upon the daughter-species work
by (e.g.) A'Hearn et al. (1995) and Schleicher and Bair (2008). We can note
that 73P is a "depleted" comet in the A'Hearn et al. (1995) taxonomy and 9P
is "typical;" as the parent species of more JFCs are observed, 73P and 9P can
be placed into better context.
9
Several people compared the two main fragments, B and C, to each other (e.g.
Biver et al., 2006; Villanueva et al., 2006; Schleicher et al., 2006; Dello Russo et al.,
2007; Kobayashi et al., 2007). The consensus result is that B and C have sim-
ilar composition. This is an important finding since both fragments are rela-
tively large fractions of the original comet and so show us fresh material that
formerly was very deep inside the nucleus. They should be excellent labora-
tories for determining heterogeneity -- i.e., whether large blocks of the comet
have different compositions. No such effect was found, and this is in stark con-
trast to comet 9P, where the heterogeneity was quite obvious after the Deep
Impact flyby (e.g. Feaga et al., 2007). The fact that 73P seems to be both (a)
homogeneous and (b) different from what may be currently considered "typi-
cal" composition suggests that this comet had an atypical formation history.
However this is speculative and, again, we are suffering somewhat from a small
JFC sample. In any case we clearly see the vital need for more surveys of JFC
composition.
One important additional result regarding composition was presented by Schleicher et al.
(2006). They showed that the B and C fragments both have the same "de-
pleted" abundance of CN, C2, and C3 relative to water. As mentioned, since
the fragments were outgassing relatively pristine material, this suggests that
this depletion seen in many JFCs could not be an evolutionary effect, but
rather is primordial. It may be indicative of the chemistry happening in the
protoplanetary disk at the location where at least some of the JFCs formed.
The proximity of 73P motivated many observers to investigate the physical
properties of the fragments. Of primary concern were the fragments' sizes and
masses. Boehnhardt et al. (1999) observed the comet in 1994, before breakup,
and estimated an upper limit of 1.1 km for the radius. Some of the most ex-
citing data on the nuclei after break-up were obtained by Howell et al. (2007),
who used radar to obtain Delay-Doppler maps of fragments B and C in May
2006. 73P was at the time only the second comet so imaged. The data show
that fragment B is at least 0.2 km in radius and that fragment C is about
0.5 to 1 km in radius. These results are consistent with earlier estimates of
those two fragments' sizes (Boehnhardt, 2002; Toth et al., 2003, 2005, 2006).
While fragment C is the primary remnant of the comet, fragment B took a
significant fraction of the mass with it.
Knowing the rotational states of the larger fragments could potentially give
insight into the fragmentation process, the dekameter-scale structure of the
comet, and/or the cometary mass. So far, there have been reports only for frag-
ment C (e.g. Storm et al., 2006; Toth et al., 2006). Fragment B was so active
and changing on such short timescales that obtaining either a photometrically-
or morphologically-derived period may be challenging. Coma structures were
seen however (e.g. Bonev et al., 2008) so a sufficient baseline of observations
could prove fruitful. Rotation periods for the other relatively bright fragments,
10
such as G and H, have not been reported to our knowledge.
Images such as Figs. 1 and 3 make it clear that there is a continuum of sizes
among the fragments. An analysis of the size distribution of all fragments has
yet to be presented, but Fuse et al. (2007) have studied a group of fragments
that at the time had all just recently broken off fragment B. Their processed
image is shown in Fig. 4, and was obtained a few weeks after the HST image in
Fig. 3. They identify 54 fragments in their data, all of which were active, and
measured the luminosity of each. Assuming that the activity is proportional
to the fragment surface area, they then derive a CSD power-law slope 1 based
on their 54 fragments: N(> R) ∝ R−1.1. This is tantalizingly similar to the
rough CSD slope for 57P as discussed in §4.1. Both CSD slopes are much
shallower than the overall JFC CSD slope as derived by Meech et al. (2004),
suggesting that the process of splitting has an underlying physical mechanism
that is different from the primary evolutionary processes (such as collisions
and erosion) that affect kilometer-scale JFCs. It is important to note however
that there is a size mismatch, so such a conclusion is tentative; there are no
independent JFCs known to have nuclei as small as the fragments seen in
73P and 57P. Interestingly, both Meech et al. (2004) and Samarasinha (2007)
have used simulations to suggest that the JFC CSD becomes shallower at
sub-kilometer sizes due to a real dearth of such comets in the inner Solar
System.
4.3 Comet 174P/Echeclus
The Centaur 174P/Echeclus = (60558) 2000 EC98 was discovered by Space-
watch in March 2000 (Scotti et al., 2000), and it orbits between 5.9 and 15.6
AU from the Sun. Its current orbital intersection distance with Jupiter is 0.9
AU and with Saturn is just 0.2 AU; as a Centaur it is likely to be significantly
perturbed on ∼107 year timescales (Levison and Duncan, 1997) and may be-
come a JFC. No cometary activity was reported for several years after its
discovery, and physical properties of the bare object were obtained by several
groups (Rousselot et al., 2005; Lorin and Rousselot, 2007; Stansberry et al.,
2008). Activity was first noticed in December 2005 by Choi et al. (2006a) and
continued through May 2006 (Choi et al., 2006b; Weissman et al., 2006), while
the comet was about 13 AU from the Sun.
Bauer et al. (2008) present an analysis of contemporaneous ground-based vis-
ible and Spitzer infrared imaging of the comet from February 2006. Their im-
ages are shown in Fig. 5, and demonstrate why this comet should be counted
1 Note that Fuse et al. (2007) call their "q" the CSD power-law slope but it is
actually the differential size distribution's slope; their 1 − q = −1.1 is the CSD
slope.
11
as one that has split. The center of brightness of the cometary activity is not
on the nucleus itself, but offset (by six arcseconds at the time the images were
taken). Furthermore there is a condensation embedded in the coma. However,
imaging obtained in March 2006 (i.e. the following month) by Rousselot (2008)
shows a more diffuse coma, and they state that the surface brightness profiles
of the coma suggest that the dust is no longer coming from a central source
but rather from a diffuse source.
One hypothesis to explain the observations is: Echeclus itself was mostly inac-
tive, but perhaps active enough in one locale for a fragment to break off. This
fragment stayed active, while the remainder of Echeclus continued to have no
activity. After a few months, the fragment itself began to disintegrate into
smaller pieces or subfragments. The subfragments remained active and so -- at
the spatial resolution obtainable from Earth -- the coma appeared to emanate
from a distributed source. The problem with this scenario is explaining why
there would not be activity from the "hole" on the primary created by the
departing fragment.
An alternate hypothesis is that we are seeing a satellite of Echeclus that just
happens to be active. However, the motion of the fragment over the course of
several months suggests that it is moving hyperbolically (Choi et al., 2006b;
Weissman et al., 2006). The apparent motion is too great for a bound orbit,
given the expected mass of Echeclus. Also, Echeclus's Hill sphere radius at
the time was roughly only 5 × 104 km, i.e. about 6 arcsec on the sky. Further
evidence against the satellite hypothesis is that a search in earlier deep imaging
(when no activity was seen) yielded no such object (Rousselot, 2008).
The fragment itself could be a few kilometers in radius (Rousselot, 2008) --
compared to the ∼40 km of the primary -- and so a large impulse would
be needed for that much mass to be accelerated up to the ∼15 to 30 m/s
required to reach escape velocity. While typical separation speeds are an order
of magnitude smaller (Boehnhardt, 2004), we note that a fragment that is flung
off the surface of Echeclus due to the primary's rotation could be given such
a speed, since in that case the fragment's speed would be proportional to the
primary's radius. On the other hand, current evidence suggests that Echeclus
has a relatively long rotation period of 27 hours (Rousselot et al., 2005).
While a fragment remains the best explanation for 174P, further study of
this enigmatic comet is certainly warranted. The main science goals would
be to (a) ascertain the nature of Echeclus's activity so as to explain how
such a large mass could have left the primary; (b) explain why activity is
so tightly localized; (c) determine what the source of the activity is (CO?
CO2? crystallization of amorphous H2O ice?) and whether this plays a role
in making fragmentation more likely; (d) monitor the rest of the Centaur
population to determine whether any other objects suffer these events, and
12
what the frequency is; and (e) infer what Centaur fragmentation implies for
the bulk structure and strength of the JFCs that the Centaurs become.
4.4 Short-Period SOHO Comets
The SOHO spacecraft has discovered over 1500 comets, almost all of which
are "sungrazers" (comets with perihelia less than about 0.06 AU). A large
fraction of the SOHO comets are part of the Kreutz family, whose comets
pass only about 0.005 AU from the center of the Sun. Since the Sun's radius
is 0.00465 AU, many Kreutz comets (and almost all the ones discovered by
SOHO, which are faint) disintegrate to dust very near perihelion if not earlier.
The Kreutz comets are all presumably fragments of a long-period comet that
broke apart thousands of years ago; see Marsden (2005a) for a recent review.
Since the Kreutz comets are of long-period, we do not consider them here.
However SOHO has discovered four other families of sungrazer comets, some
of which may be of short-period. While the Meyer group (Meyer, 2002) comets
have orbital inclinations of about 72◦, well out of the ecliptic, the Marsden
group (Marsden, 2002b), the Kracht group (Kracht, 2002a), and the Kracht
II group (Kracht, 2002b) have members with inclinations of 27◦, 13◦, and 13◦,
respectively, perfectly normal for short-period comets. As with the Kreutz
family, the members of each group have similar orbits and thus imply a single
progenitor in the past. The perihelia of these comets are at about 0.05 AU,
so, while not currently passing within the Sun's Roche limit, perhaps stress
due to tidal forces or due to energy transport facilitated fragmentation at
higher heliocentric distances. Such distant fragmentation has been suggested
by Sekanina (2002) for the Kreutz comets.
Recent work incorporating the 12-year database of cometary astrometry from
SOHO has revealed possible linkages between some of the comets in these three
groups, as well as between some comets not belonging to any known group.
This information is collected in Table 2. It is worth noting that the linking of
apparitions with short-arc orbits can be difficult, especially when independent
comets move on similar orbits anyway. There are several other possible links
among comets within the three groups that have been reported (e.g. Marsden,
2006; Kracht, 2008). Sekanina and Chodas (2005) present a detailed analysis
of some of the Marsden and Kracht group linkages.
Detailed physical studies of the sungrazing short-period comets are currently
limited to observations by Sun-staring spacecraft. These often provide mag-
nitudes and thus some secular light curve. In many cases, the comets are
sufficiently faint that neither a tail nor an extended coma is visible, limiting
the amount of available information on gas and dust. The nuclei are probably
13
of order dekameters in radius (Marsden, 2005a); this means that even with an
improved orbit, it would be feasible to observe such a comet well away from
the Sun only when it is near Earth. For example, a 10-meter radius nucleus at
opposition 0.1 AU from Earth still only achieves an R-band magnitude of 22.5.
So even in a very favorable apparition (which would not happen very often to
begin with), it will not be easy to make detailed studies of such comets. The
detailed study of a wide sample of sungrazing short-period comets will proba-
bly have to wait for very deep and wide sky surveys, or for classically-scheduled
time at the largest telescopes.
4.5 Cometary Debris
As comet 73P shows, comet fragments have a distribution of sizes. Indeed,
Fig. 1 demonstrates that such a comet gives off fragments that are decimeter
sized and larger -- fragments that are larger than what can be typically lifted
off a comet's surface simply by gas drag (Grun and Jessberger, 1990). These
fragments remain in a trail in the orbit plane since radiation pressure acts
slowly on them.
The deep infrared observations by IRAS brought to light the existence of
cometary debris trails (Sykes and Walker, 1992), consisting mainly of mil-
limeter and centimeter sized grains that are the largest solid bodies that come
off the comet during "normal" activity. Such grains have often been found to
contain most of the mass that is contained in dust. The grains in the trails rep-
resent an intermediate size scale between the visible-wavelength dust that is
typically micron sized and smaller, and observed fragments that are dekameter
sized and larger.
An infrared survey of debris trails has been performed by Spitzer. Reach et al.
(2007a) present 24 µm imaging of 34 JFCs in which a trail is unambiguously
seen in 27 of them -- about 80%. Most of these comets were observed while
2 to 4 AU from the Sun, and months away from perihelion. Examples of the
observations presented by Reach et al. (2007a) are shown in Fig. 6.
Most of the comets in their survey had not suffered splitting events in the
traditional sense; the particles were liberated by regular cometary activity.
One could call these millimeter and centimeter sized particles "fragments"
only in a liberal definition. Nonetheless, the high frequency of trails, coupled
with the fact that often the trail was seen all the way out to the edge of
the field of view, indicates that JFCs are prodigious producers of millimeter
and centimeter sized fragments into the interplanetary dust environment. As
Reach et al. (2007a) point out, the total mass of these large grains is larger
than the total mass of grains seen at visible wavelengths.
14
4.6 Searches for Fragments
Usually fragments are found serendipitously, but a few pointed searches for
fragments have been performed. The survey of Chen and Jewitt (1994), men-
tioned earlier, focussed on finding fragments near (i.e. a few arcminutes away
from) the primary comet. The faint meter and dekameter scale objects could
have been missed, however. Beech et al. (2004) did a telescopic search for
meter-sized (and larger) Perseid meteoroids while Earth was passing through
the meteor stream; this would have detected fragments of the Halley-family
comet 109P/Swift-Tuttle. They sought to find objects a few arcminutes away
from the radiant before they collided with Earth's atmosphere. The search
found no objects, thus constraining the space density of meter-scale objects
within the stream.
Another survey has made use of the proliferation of CCD cameras with very
wide fields-of-view. Stevenson and Jedicke (2007) have used the Megacam in-
strument on the CFH Telescope atop Mauna Kea to search for fragments up
to half a degree away from a comet's head. They have observed about 12
JFCs so far with no fragments seen to a limiting magnitude of about 24. For
these comets this limit corresponds to fragments of size about 100 m in ra-
dius. With such a large field-of-view, the search is not just a snapshot in time,
but actually tests whether these comets have had any splitting event in the
previous several months. This kind of survey gives a more complete view of
the fragmentation history and so should provide a good new measurement of
the frequency of JFC splittings.
5 Concluding Remarks
The interested reader is encouraged to study the recent review of split comets
given by Boehnhardt (2004). We have tried here to provide a summary of
recent developments on the topic of split comets. But what does the future
hold for our understanding of this phenomenon? While splittings caused by
tides can be predicted if the comet's orbit is known, the large majority of JFC
splittings instead happen stochastically. Classically-scheduled observing runs
will often fail to catch these events. Synoptic observations of comets however
will in general be more fruitful for understanding the full evolution of a comet
before, during, and after a fragmentation event; unbiassed and well-sampled
datasets will be important.
It is possible that all-sky survey projects in the coming decade will indeed
provide us with a great deal of such data. For example, Pan-STARRS and
LSST will likely discover several hundred comets each in their first year of
15
operation in addition to the thousands of new Trojans, Centaurs, and trans-
Neptunian objects they will find (Jewitt, 2003; Ivezi´c et al., 2008). In addi-
tion, the temporal coverage (scanning the sky on week-long timescales), depth
(reaching approximately 23rd magnitude), and angular resolution will ensure
that moderate-sized fragments of JFCs will be found more reliably. Further-
more, we will be able to follow the photometric and dynamic evolution of
the fragments for months and possibly years at a time. The datasets will
revolutionize our picture of fragment behavior and endurance (in addition to
revolutionizing many questions about comets).
Since the review by Boehnhardt (2004) was published, the most important
event with regard to split JFCs was the apparition of comet 73P/Schwass-
mann-Wachmann 3 in 2006. Following up other known split comets in the
future would be worthwhile as well but 73P represents a unique case that is
crucial to study. Observations of 73P in forthcoming years can give us new
details about its fragments and its continuing evolution. If fragments B and
C survive, we will be able to watch their new surfaces age as they continue to
be exposed to the space environment. Will the resulting chemistry change the
apparent production rates we measure in their comae? If so, how? Observations
of other JFCs at multiple apparitions have shown a constancy in relative coma
abundances from orbit to orbit (A'Hearn et al., 1995), but likely none of those
comets have had such a recent fragmentation event that produced a secondary
of comparable size to the primary. Physical observations of the continued
unraveling of fragment B and perhaps the eventual unraveling of fragment C
would also give us more insight into cometary structure. Unfortunately, three
of the next five apparitions of 73P are unfavorable -- only the visits in 2022
and 2033 are good -- but even limited data on each fragment at each orbit
would be useful.
More generally, wide-field observations of all JFCs that will make close ap-
proaches to Earth would be useful for understanding the frequency of frag-
mentation and the endurance of the fragments, since the proximity will make
searches for meter-scale fragments feasible. For example, comet 103P/Hartley
2 approaches to 0.12 AU in 2010, and comet 45P/Honda-Mrkos-Pajdusakov´a
comes to 0.06 AU in 2011.
Acknowledgements
We thank W. T. Reach, J. M. Bauer, H. A. Weaver, and T. Fuse for the
use of their figures, and M. S. Kelley for helpful suggestions. We appreciate
the thorough reviews of this manuscript given by N. Samarasinha and an
anonymous referee.
16
References
A'Hearn, M.F., Millis, R.L., Schleicher, D.G., Osip, D.J., Birch, P.V., 1995.
The ensemble properties of comets: Results from narrowband photometry
of 85 comets, 1976-1992. Icarus 118, 223 -- 270.
A'Hearn, M.F., 2008. Deep Impact and the origin and evolution of cometary
nuclei. Space Sci. Rev., 138, 237 -- 246.
Bauer, J.M., Choi, Y.-J., Weissman, P.R., Stansberry, J.A., Fernandez, Y.R.,
Roe, H.G., Buratti, B.J., Sung, H.-I., 2008. The large-grained dust coma of
174P/Echeclus. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 120, 393 -- 404.
Beech, M., Illingworth, A., Brown, P., 2004. A telescopic search for large Per-
seid meteoroids. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 348, 1395 -- 1400.
Beech, M., Nikolova, S., 2001. The endurance lifetime of ice fragments in
cometary streams. Plan. & Space Sci. 49, 23 -- 29.
Birtwhistle, P., 2008. 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann (fragment summary
2006). URL http://www.birtwhistle.org/Gallery73P-2006Summary.htm.
Accessed June 25, 2008.
Biver, N., Bockel´ee-Morvan, D., Boissier, J., Colom, P., Crovisier, J.,
Lecacheux, A., Lis, D. C., Parise, B., Menten, K., and the Odin team, 2006.
Comparison of the chemical composition of fragments B and C of comet
73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 from radio observations. Bull. Amer. As-
tron. Soc. 38, 484.
Boehnhardt, H., 2002. Comet splitting observations and model scenarios.
Earth Moon & Plan. 89, 91 -- 115.
Boehnhardt, H., 2004. Split comets. In: Festou, M. C., Keller, H. U., Weaver,
H. A. (Eds.), Comets II, pp. 301 -- 316. University of Arizona Press.
Boehnhardt, H., Holdstock, S., Hainaut, O., Tozzi, G.P., Benetti, S., Licandro,
J., 2002. 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 - One orbit after breakup: Search
for fragments. Earth Moon & Plan. 90, 131 -- 139.
Boehnhardt, H., Rainer, N., Birkle, K., Schwehm, G., 1999. The nuclei of
comets 26P/Grigg-Skjellerup and 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3. Astron.
& Astrophys. 341, 912 -- 917.
Bonev, T., Boehnhardt, H., and Borisov, G., 2008. Broadband imaging and
narrowband polarimetry of comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3, compo-
nents B and C, on 3, 4, 8, and 9 May 2006. Astron. & Astrophys. 480,
277 -- 287.
Carusi, A., Perozzi, E., Valsecchi, G.B., Kresak, L., 1985. First results of the
integration of motion of short-period comets over 800 years. In: Carusi, A.,
Valsecchi, G.B. (Eds.), Dynamics of Comets: Their Origin and Evolution,
pp. 319 -- 340. D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Chen, J., Jewitt, D., 1994. On the rate at which comets split. Icarus 108,
265 -- 271.
Choi, Y.-J., Weissman, P. R., Polishook, D., 2006a. (60558) 2000 EC98. IAU
Circ. 8656.
Choi, Y.-J., Weissman, P.R., Chesley, S., Bauer, J., Stansberry, J., Tegler, S.,
17
Romanishin, W., Consolmagno, G., 2006b. Comet 174P/Echeclus. Central
Bureau Electr. Teleg. 563.
Dello Russo, N., Vervack, R.J., Weaver, H.A., Biver, N., Bockel´ee-Morvan, D.,
Croivisier, J., Lisse, C.M., 2007. Compositional homogeneity in the frag-
mented comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3. Nature 448, 172 -- 175.
DiSanti, M. A., Anderson, W.M., Villanueva, G.L., Bonev, B.P., Magee-Sauer,
K., Gibb, E.L., Mumma, M.J., 2007. Depleted carbon monoxide in fragment
C of the Jupiter-Family comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3. Astrophys.
J. 661, L101-L104.
DiSanti, M. A., Mumma, M. J., 2008. Reservoirs for comets: Compositional
differences based on infrared observations. Space Sci. Rev., 138, 127 -- 145.
Ernst, C. M., Schultz, P. H., 2007. Evolution of the Deep Impact flash: Im-
plications for the nucleus surface based on laboratory experiments. Icarus
190, 334 -- 344.
Feaga, L. M., A'Hearn, M.F., Sunshine, J.M., Groussin, O., Farnham, T.L.,
2007. Asymmetries in the distribution of H2O and CO2 in the inner coma
of comet 9P/Tempel 1 as observed by Deep Impact. Icarus 190, 345 -- 356.
Fernandez, Y. R., Jewitt, D. C., Sheppard, S. S., 2002. Comet 57P/du Toit-
Neujmin-Delporte. IAU Circ. 7935.
Fuse, T., Yamamoto, N., Kinoshita, D., Furusawa, H., Watanabe, J., 2007.
Observations of fragments split from nucleus B of comet 73P/Schwassmann-
Wachamnn 3 with Subaru Telescope. Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 59, 381 -- 386.
Groussin, O., A'Hearn, M.F., Li, J.-Y., Thomas, P.C., Sunshine, J.M., Lisse,
C.M., Meech, K.J., Farnham, T.L., Feaga, L.M., Delamere, W.A., 2007.
Surface temperature of the nucleus of comet 9P/Tempel 1. Icarus 187, 16 --
25.
Grun, E., Jessberger, E. K., 1990. Dust. In: Huebner, W. F. (Ed.), Physics
and Chemistry of Comets, pp. 113 -- 175. Springer-Verlag.
Hanner, M. S., Giese, R. H., Wiess, K., Zerull, R., 1981. On the definition
of albedo and application to irregular partcles. Astron. & Astrophys. 104,
42 -- 46.
Holsapple, K. A., Hausen, K. R., 2007. A crater and its ejecta: An interpreta-
tion of Deep Impact. Icarus 187, 345 -- 356.
Howell, E. S., Nolan, M.C., Harmon, J.K., Lovell, A.J., Benner, L.A., Ostro,
S.J., Campbell, D.B., Margot, J., 2007. Radar and radio observations of
the fragmented comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3. Bull. Amer. Astron.
Soc. 39, 486.
Hughes, D. W., McBride, N., 1992. Short-period comet splitting. J. Brit. As-
tron. Assoc. 102, 265 -- 268.
Ivezi´c, Z., and 93 colleagues, 2008. LSST: From science drivers to reference
design and anticipated data products. arXiv:0805.2366v1 [astro-ph] 15 May
2008.
Jewitt, D., 2003. Project Pan-STARRS and the outer Solar System. Earth
Moon & Plan. 92, 465 -- 476.
Jewitt, D., 1990. The persistent coma of comet P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
18
1. Astrophys. J. 351, 277 -- 286.
Kobayashi, H., Kawakita, H., Mumma, M.J., Bonev, B.P., Watanabe, J., Fuse,
T., 2007. Organic volatiles in comet 73P-B/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 ob-
served during its outburst: A clue to the formation region of the Jupiter-
Family comets. Astrophys. J. 668, L75 -- L78.
Kracht, R., 2002a. Comets C/1999 M3, 2002 E1 (SOHO). Minor Plan. Electr.
Circ. 2002-E18.
Kracht, R., 2002b. Comets C/2002 R4, 2002 R5, 2002 R6, 2002 R7, 2002 R8
(SOHO). Minor Plan. Electr. Circ. 2002-S35.
Kracht, R., 2008. Orbital links between the Marsden and between the Kracht
group comets. URL http://www.rkracht.de/soho/links.htm. Accessed
July 3, 2008.
Lien, D. J., 1991. Optical properties of cometary dust. In: Newburn, R.L.,
Neugebauer, M., Rahe, J. (Eds.), Comets in the post-Halley era, pp. 1005 --
1041. Kluwer.
Levison, H. F., Duncan, M. J., 1997. From the Kuiper Belt to Jupiter-Family
comets: The spatial distribution of ecliptic comets. Icarus 127, 13 -- 32.
Lorin, O., Rousselot, P., 2007. Search for cometary activity in three Centaurs
[(60558) Echeclus, 2000 FZ53 and 2000 GM137] and two trans-Neptunian
objects [(29981) 1999 TD10 and (28978) Ixion]. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.
376, 881 -- 889.
Lowry, S. C., Fitzsimmons, A., 2001. CCD photometry of distant comets II.
Astron. & Astrophys. 365, 204 -- 213.
Marsden, B. G., 2002. Comet 57P/du Toit-Neujmin-Delporte. IAU Circ. 7934.
Marsden, B. G., 2002. Comet C/2002 C3 (SOHO). Minor Plan. Electr. Circ.
2002-C28.
Marsden, B. G., 2004. Comets C/2004 V9, 2004 V10 (SOHO). Minor Plan.
Electr. Circ. 2004-X73.
Marsden, B. G., 2005a. Sungrazing comets. Ann. Rev. Astron. & Astrophys.
43, 75 -- 102.
Marsden, B. G., 2005b. Comets C/2005 E3, 2005 E4 (SOHO). Minor Plan.
Electr. Circ. 2005-E87.
Marsden, B. G., 2005c. Comets C/2005 W4, 2005 W5 (SOHO). Minor Plan.
Electr. Circ. 2005-X14.
Marsden, B. G., 2006. Comets C/1996 X3, 1996 X4, 1996 X5, 1997 B5, 1997
B6, 1997 B7 (SOHO). Minor Plan. Electr. Circ. 2006-C49.
Marsden, B. G., 2007. Comet P/1999 R1 = 2003 R5 = 2007 R5 (SOHO).
Minor Plan. Electr. Circ. 2007-S16.
Marsden, B. G., 2008a. Comets C/2007 Y8, 2007 Y9, 2007 Y10, 2008 A3
(SOHO). Minor Plan. Electr. Circ. 2008-B61.
Marsden, B. G., 2008b. Comets C/2008 G5, 2008 G6, 2008 H2, 2008 H3
(SOHO). Minor Plan. Electr. Circ. 2008-L29.
Marsden, B. G., 2008c. Comets C/2002 Q8, 2008 E4, 2008 F1 (SOHO). Minor
Plan. Electr. Circ. 2008-F32.
Marsden, B. G., 2008d. Comet C/1999 X3 = 2004 E2 = 2008 K10 (SOHO).
19
Minor Plan. Electr. Circ. 2008-S49.
Marsden, B. G., 2008e. Comets C/2001 D1 = 2004 X7 = 2008 S2 (SOHO).
Minor Plan. Electr. Circ. 2008-S82.
Meech, K. J., Hainaut, O. R., Marsden, B. G., 2004. Comets nucleus size
distributions from HST and Keck telescopes. Icarus 170, 463 -- 491.
Meech, K. J., Svoren, J., 2004. Using cometary activity to trace the physical
and chemical evolution of cometary nuclei. In: Festou, M. C., Keller, H. U.,
Weaver, H. A. (Eds.), Comets II, pp. 317 -- 335. University of Arizona Press.
Meyer, M., 2002. Comets C/2002 C3 (SOHO). Minor Plan. Electr. Circ. 2002-
C28.
Mumma, M. J., 2008. Chemical diversity of organic volatiles among comets:
An emerging taxonomy and implications for processes in the proto-planetary
disk. In: Kwok, S., Sandford, S. A. (Eds.), Proceedings IAU Symposium No.
251: Organic Matter in Space, pp. 309-310. Cambridge University Press.
Reach, W. T., Kelley, M. S., Sykes, M. V., 2007. A survey of debris trails from
short-period comets. Icarus 191, 298 -- 322.
Reach, W. T., Lisse, C. M., Kelley, M. S., Vaubaillon J., 2007. Rocket effect for
fragments and meteoroids of the split comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
3. Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc. 39, 524.
Rousselot, P., 2008. 174P/Echeclus: A strange case of outburst. Astron. &
Astrophys. 480, 543 -- 550.
Rousselot, P., Petit, J.-M., Poulet, F., Sergeev, A., 2005. Photometric study of
Centaur (60558) 2000 EC98 and trans-neptunian object (55637) 2002 UX25
at different phase angles. Icarus 176, 478 -- 491.
Samarasinha, N. H., 2007. Rotation and activity of comets. Adv. Space. Res.
39, 421 -- 427.
Schleicher, D. G., Birch, P. V., Bair, A. N., 2006. The composition of the
interior of comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3: Results from narrowband
photometry of multiple components. Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc. 38, 485.
Schleicher, D. G., Bair, A. N., 2008. Compositional taxonomy of comets and
the unique cases of 96P/Machholz 1 and 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
3. In: LPI Editorial Board (Eds.), LPI Contribution No. 1405: Asteroids,
Comets, Meteors 2008 (CD-ROM), paper ID 8174.
Scotti, J. V., Gleason, A. E., Montani, J. L., Read, M. T., 2000. Eight TNOs
and Centaurs. Minor Plan. Electr. Circ. 2000-E64.
Sekanina, Z., 1982. The problem of split comets in review. In: Wilkening, L.
L. (Ed.), Comets, pp. 251 -- 287. University of Arizona Press.
Sekanina, Z., 1997. The problem of split comets revisited. Astron. & Astro-
phys. 318, L5 -- L8.
Sekanina, Z., 2002. Runaway fragmentation of sungrazing comets observed
with the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory. Astrophys. J. 576, 1085 -- 1089.
Sekanina, Z., 2007. Earth's 2006 encounter with comet 73P/Schwassmann-
Wachmann: Products of nucleus fragmentation seen in closeup. In: Valsec-
chi, G.B., Vokrouhlicky, D. (Eds.), Near Earth Objects, our celestial neigh-
bors: Opportunity and risk, pp. 211 -- 220. Cambridge University Press.
20
Sekanina, Z., Chodas, P. W., 2002. Comet 57P/du Toit-Neujmin-Delporte.
IAU Circ. 7957.
Sekanina, Z., Chodas, P. W., 2005. Origin of the Marsden and Kracht groups
of sunskirting comets. I. Association with comet 96P/Machholz and its in-
terplanetary complex. Astrophys. J. Supp. Ser. 161, 551 -- 586.
Stansberry, J., Grundy, W., Brown, M., Cruikshank, D., Spencer, J., Trilling,
D., Margot, J.-L., 2008. Physical properties of Kuiper Belt and Centaur
objects: Constraints from the Spitzer Space Telescope. In: Barucci, M. A.,
Boehnhardt, H., Cruikshank, D.P., Morbidelli, A. (Eds.), The Solar System
beyond Neptune, pp. 161 -- 179. University of Arizona Press.
Stevenson, R., Jedicke, R. 2007. An observational limit of decameter scale
fragment mass loss from comets. Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc. 39, 525. 54.09
Storm, S., Samarasinha, N., Mueller, B., Farnham, T., Fernandez, Y., Kidder,
A., Snowden, D., A'Hearn, M., Harris, W., Knight, M., Morgenthaler, J.,
Lisse, C., Roesler, F., 2006. Time variability of component C of the frag-
mented comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3. Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc.
38, 504.
Sykes, M. V., Walker, R. G., 1992. Cometary dust trails. I - Survey. Icarus 95,
180 -- 210.
Sunshine, J. M., Groussin, O., Schultz, P.H., A'Hearn, M.F., Feaga, L.M.,
Farnham, T.L., Klaasen, K.P., 2007. The distribution of water ice in the
interior of comet Tempel 1. Icarus 190, 284 -- 294.
Toth, I., Lamy, P. L., Weaver, H. A., 2003. Hubble Space Telescope obser-
vations of the nucleus fragment 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3-B. Bull.
Amer. Astron. Soc. 35, 985.
Toth, I., Lamy, P., Weaver, H. A., 2005. Hubble Space Telescope observations
of the nucleus fragment 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3-C. Icarus 178, 235 --
247.
Toth, I., Lamy, P., Weaver, H., A'Hearn, M., Kaasalainen, M., Lowry, S., 2006.
Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc. 38, 489.
Villanueva, G. L., Bonev, B.P., Mumma, M.J., Magee-Sauer, K., DiSanti, M.
A., Salyk, C., Blake, G. A., 2006. The volatile composition of the split
ecliptic comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3: A comparison of fragments
C and B. Astrophys. J. 650, L87 -- L90.
Weaver, H. A., Lisse, C. M., Mutchler, M. J., Lamy, P., Toth, I., Reach,
W. T., 2006. Hubble Space Telescope investigation of the disintegration
of 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3. Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc. 38, 490.
Weissman, P. R., Chesley, S. R., Choi, Y. J., Bauer, J. M., Tegler, S.C., Ro-
manishin, W.J., Consolmagno, G., Stansberry, J. A., 2006. Motion of the
activity source associated with active Centaur 174P/Echeclus (60558). Bull.
Amer. Astron. Soc. 38, 551.
21
Table 1
Known Split JFCs
Comet
3D/Biela
16P/Brooks 2
51P/Harrington
When
1840
1889, 1995
1994, 2001
57P/du Toit-Neujmin-Delporte
2002
69P/Taylor
1915
73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3
1995, 2001, 2006
79P/du Toit-Hartley
1982
101P/Chernykh
108P/Ciffreo
120P/Shoemaker-Holt 1
141P/Machholz 2
174P/Echeclus
205P/Giacobini
D/1993 F2 Shoemaker-Levy 9
P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill)
1991, 2005
1985
1996
1987, 1989
2006
1896, 2008
1992
2004
List adapted from work by Boehnhardt (2004).
Note that 174P is also a Centaur.
22
Table 2
Potentially Periodic Sungrazers
Comets
Group
P Refs.
C/1999 J6 = C/2004 V9
Marsden
5.49
1
C/1999 M3 = C/2004 L10
Kracht
4.95
1,2
C/1999 N5 = C/2005 E4
Marsden
5.66
3
C/1999 N6 = C/2004 J4 or C/2004 J18
Kracht
4.81
1,2
C/1999 R1 = C/2003 R5 = C/2007 R5
Kracht II
3.99
C/1999 X3 = C/2004 E2 = C/2008 K10
(none)
C/2000 O3 = C/2005 W4
Kracht
C/2001 D1 = C/2004 X7 = C/2008 S2
(none)
C/2002 Q8 = C/2008 E4
Kracht
4.22
5.32
3.78
5.52
C/2002 R1 = C/2008 A3
Marsden
5.37
4
5
6
7
8
9
C/2002 S11 = C/2008 G6
Kracht
5.54
10
All comets are named SOHO. P = orbital period in years.
References: 1 = Marsden (2004), 2 = Sekanina and Chodas (2005),
3 = Marsden (2005b), 4 = Marsden (2007), 5 = Marsden (2008d),
6 = Marsden (2005c), 7 = Marsden (2008e), 8 = Marsden (2008c),
9 = Marsden (2008a), 10 = Marsden (2008b).
23
Fig. 1. Mosaic of comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 as observed by the Spitzer
Space Telescope over May 4 to 6, 2006, at a wavelength of 24 µm. About three
dozen fragments of this split comet are visible here, and almost every one has its
own cometary tail. The fragments themselves all lie on the comet's projected orbit.
Courtesy W. T. Reach of Caltech.
24
Fig. 2.
Information about the fragments of 57P. At top are the 18 fragments dis-
covered by Fernandez et al. (2002) on July 17, 2002. Each panel is 44 arcsec across.
Short white segments indicate the location of each fragment. Note the wide variety
of morphologies and condensations. At bottom is a schematic showing the location
of each fragment with respect to the head - fragment A. The location of fragment
B (Marsden, 2002a) is also shown.
25
Fig. 3. Hubble Space Telescope image of fragment B of comet 73P, taken on April
18, 2006 by Weaver et al. (2006). The fragment itself is the condensation at upper
left; the image was taken just after the fragment had shed several fragments of its
own. These are the dozens of condensations farther down the tail. The image is
about 25 arcsec across, and HST's spatial resolution is just 8 km/pixel (i.e. 0.05
arcsec/pixel). Courtesy H. A. Weaver of JHU APL.
26
Fig. 4. Detail of an image (after unsharp masking) of fragment B taken by Fuse et al.
(2007) on May 3, 2006, with the Subaru telescope. The image is their Figure 1. The
field size is 96 by 68 arcsec. Fragment B itself is in the upper left, and Fuse et al.
(2007) report finding 54 fragments in the image. Compare the time and scale to
Fig. 3. White streaks are trailed stars.
27
Fig. 5.
Images of comet 174P from February 24, 2006, adapted from Figs. 1 and
3 in the work by Bauer et al. (2008). The left panel shows the R-band image from
the Table Mountain Observatory 0.6-m telescope; the right shows the 24-µm image
from the Spitzer Space Telescope. In each panel, the two arrows indicate the main
body of Echeclus itself and the condensation of the coma. Note that the orientations
are slightly different; in the TMO image, equatorial north is up, while in the SST
image, north is 21◦ to the right of up.
Spitzer images of
Fig. 6.
four representative JFCs taken from the work
by Reach et al. (2007a). Clockwise from top-left: 10P/Tempel 2, 48P/Johnson,
129P/Shoemaker-Levy 3, and 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. All show a linear trail
populated by millimeter (and larger) scale grains, though with different meridional
and longitudinal variations. While some of the comet-to-comet variation is due to
observing geometry, there are some intrinsic differences in the trails.
28
|
1002.3650 | 1 | 1002 | 2010-02-19T01:01:26 | Inflating Hot Jupiters With Ohmic Dissipation | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | We present a new, magnetohydrodynamic mechanism for inflation of close-in giant extrasolar planets. The idea behind the mechanism is that current, which is induced through interaction of atmospheric winds and the planetary magnetic field, results in significant Ohmic dissipation of energy in the interior. We develop an analytical model for computation of interior Ohmic dissipation, with a simplified treatment of the atmosphere. We apply our model to HD209458b, Tres-4b and HD189733b. With conservative assumptions for wind speed and field strength, our model predicts a generated power that appears to be large enough to maintain the transit radii, opening an unexplored avenue towards solving a decade-old puzzle of extrasolar gas giant radius anomalies. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph |
Draft version August 4, 2018
Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 11/10/09
INFLATING HOT JUPITERS WITH OHMIC DISSIPATION
Konstantin Batygin & David J. Stevenson
Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125
Draft version August 4, 2018
ABSTRACT
We present a new, magnetohydrodynamic mechanism for inflation of close-in giant extrasolar plan-
ets. The idea behind the mechanism is that current, which is induced through interaction of atmo-
spheric winds and the planetary magnetic field, results in significant Ohmic dissipation of energy in
the interior. We develop an analytical model for computation of interior Ohmic dissipation, with a
simplified treatment of the atmosphere. We apply our model to HD209458b, Tres-4b and HD189733b.
With conservative assumptions for wind speed and field strength, our model predicts a generated
power that appears to be large enough to maintain the transit radii, opening an unexplored avenue
towards solving a decade-old puzzle of extrasolar gas giant radius anomalies.
Subject headings: planets and satellites: interiors -- magnetohydrodynamics -- methods: analytical
1.
INTRODUCTION
The detection of the first transiting extrasolar planet
HD209458b (Charbonneau et al. 2000; Henry et al. 2000)
marked the first observation of a planet whose radius is
anomalously large. With the current aggregate of tran-
siting planets exceeding 60, over-inflated "hot Jupiters"
are now known to be common (Fig.1), and understand-
ing their radii has become recognized as an outstanding
problem in planetary astrophysics (Baraffe et al. 2010).
Most proposed explanations require an interior power
source that would replace the radiated heat from grav-
itational contraction and cause a planet to reach ther-
mal equilibrium with a larger-than-expected radius. In
the context of such solutions, the generated heat must
be deposited into the interior envelope, i.e. below the
radiative/convective boundary, in order to maintain the
core entropy (and therefore the radius) of the planet. No-
tably, eccentricity tides (Bodenheimer et al. 2001), obliq-
uity tides of a Cassini state (Winn & Holman 2005), and
deposition of kinetic energy to adiabatic depths by dy-
namical and convective instabilities (Guillot & Showman
2002) have been invoked to provide an extra power source
in the interior of the planet. It has been shown that the
required powers are rather modest (Burrows et al. 2007),
but it is unlikely that any of the proposed solutions alone
are able to account for all observed radii (Baraffe et al.
2010; Fortney & Nettelmann 2009).
Here we show that the anomalous sizes of close-in exo-
planets can be explained by a magnetohydrodynamic
mechanism. The interactions of zonal winds with the
expected planetary magnetic field in a thermally ionized
atmosphere induce an emf that drives electrical currents
into the interior. These currents dissipate Ohmically and
thus maintain the interior entropy of the planet. The
primary controlling factors in our model are the atmo-
spheric temperature, wind velocity and strength of the
magnetic field, as they dictate how much current is al-
lowed to penetrate the interior. Other variables, such
as metalicity also contribute, but to a smaller degree.
Our results predict that interior heating of this kind oc-
curs in all close-in exoplanets with magnetic fields, but it
[email protected]
Fig. 1. -- Scatter-plot of mass vs. radius of transiting Jovian exo-
planets. The three planets considered in the text as well as Jupiter
& Saturn are labeled. The two lines represent the theoretical mass-
radius relationships for a core-less planet (dashed) and one with a
40M⊕ core (solid) from Bodenheimer et al. (2003). Planets above
the dashed line require an inflation mechanism to halt gravitational
contraction.
is negligible if the atmospheric temperature is not high
enough for sufficient thermal ionization to take place.
Smaller, but hot exoplanets are attributed to heavy el-
ement enrichment in the interior. While the inflation
mechanism we present here is general, the quantitative
modeling in this work is specific to HD209458b, Tres-4b,
and HD189733b which are arguably the better studied
transiting exoplanets.
2. STRUCTURAL MODEL & ELECTRICAL
CONDUCTIVITY
Unlike Jupiter and Saturn, close-in extra-solar gas gi-
ants are exposed to high irradiation due to their prox-
imity to parent stars. This forces their atmospheric
temperature-pressure profiles to be significantly shal-
lower than their solar system counterparts (Fortney &
Nettelmann 2009). In particular, the lower atmospheres
(P (cid:38) 0.1 Bars) of hot Jupiters are believed to be almost
isothermal while the radiative/convective boundaries are
thought to lie at P ∼ 100− 1000 Bars, depending on the
planet (Showman et al. 2008).
The isothermal sections of extrasolar gas giant atmo-
spheres often reach temperatures close to 2000 K (Spiegel
0.511.520.511.52SaturnJupiterTres!4bHD 209458bHD 189733bR (RJ)M (MJ) 2
Batygin & Stevenson
(cid:118)(cid:117)(cid:117)(cid:116) N(cid:88)
(cid:19) 3
2
(cid:18) mekbT
2π2
et al. 2009) and in some cases, even higher (Borucki et al.
2009). These temperatures are not high enough to ionize
H or He significantly, however, alkali metals such as Na
and K will be partially ionized. As a result, electrical
conductivity in the interior of a hot Jupiter is dominated
by ionization of hydrogen, while in the outer region of
the planet, electrical conductivity is primarily due to the
ionization of alkali metals, with the transition between
the two inoization regimes taking place at P ∼ 300 Bars.
Thermal ionization is governed by the Saha equation:
=
j
(1)
(cid:80) n+
exp (−Ij/kbT ) ,
n+
j ne
nj − n+
where nj and n+
j are the total and positively ionized
number densities of constituent j respectively, ne =
j is the total electron number density, me is the elec-
tron mass, kb is Boltzmann's constant, T is temperature,
is Plank's constant, and Ij is the ionization potential
of constituent j. If the ionization is far from complete
j (cid:28) fjn), the abundances of alkali metals, fj are held
(n+
constant, and the atmosphere is isothermal, it is easy to
show that the electron number density takes on an ex-
ponential profile with an ionization scale-height that is
twice as large as the density scale-heght:
ne = n0
r0−r
2H ,
fiχie
(2)
i=1
where χ's are the RHS's of equation (1), r0 is the ra-
dial distance at some reference point (P = 10 Bars) and
H = kbT /µg is the density scale-height. In our ionization
calculations, we considered the following alkali metals:
Na, K, Li, Rb, Fe, Cs and Ca. Their abundances and
ionization potentials were inferred from Lodders (1999)
and Cox et al. (2000) respectively.
The atmospheric temperatures above the isothermal
layer differ significantly from planet to planet. In partic-
ular, thermal inversions have been detected in the atmo-
spheres of HD209458b (Burrows et al. 2007) and Tres-4b
(Knutson et al. 2009) but not in HD189733b.
In our
models, we adopt atmospheric temperature profiles sim-
ilar to that of Spiegel et al. (2009) for HD209458b and
Tres-4b, and the 1D profile of Fortney et al. (2010) for
HD189733b. The relatively cool temperatures attained
above P (cid:46) 0.1 Bars are of significant importance to our
models because they provide insulating shells which are
impenetrable to radial current. Consequently, current
loops are necessarily setup through the interior, and any
current flowing in the ionosphere is not relevant. We
place the radiative/convective boundary at P ∼ 100 Bars
in all of our models.
We did not have to explicitly compute the ionization
fractions of H and He, as they are published in the equa-
tion of state (Saumon et al. 1995), which we employed in
our model.
In particular, we used the "interpolated"
version of the equation of state, where ionization oc-
curs smoothly with pressure and temperature. Although
the planetary structure was core-less, we mimicked the
presence of a core by changing the Helium content from
Y = 0.24 to Y = 0.3 (Burrows et al. 2003) in some of
our models.
Fig. 2. -- Electrical conductivity profile of
the nominal
HD209458b model with Tiso = 1700K, Y = 0.24 and Z = 1×solar.
The inset is a magnification of the profile in the outer part of planet.
The model parameters R, δ and γ are labeled. The dashed lines are
functional approximations to the conductivity profile where zonal
flow is present. The highlighted region corresponds to the upper
convective envelope (100 − 3000)Bars, where most of the interior
dissipation takes place.
Having computed the electron number density, the
electrical conductivity of a gas is given by (Tipler &
Llewellyn 2002)
(cid:114) πme
σ =
ne−
n
e2
meA
8kbT
(3)
where n and A are the number density, and the number
density weighted cross-section of everything other than
electrons. Strictly speaking, the above equation is only
valid for non-degenerate gas. However, by the point mat-
ter becomes degenerate in our models, the resistivity is
completely negligible and the details of its profile have
no noticeable effect on the results.
Since we are only interested in the part of the planet,
interior to the atmospheric temperature minimum, we
define the model radius r = R as the point of maximal
conductivity in the atmosphere (P = 75 mbars), and we
set the outer edge of our model at the conductivity min-
imum, r = R + γ (P = 30 mbars). We place the bottom
boundary of the "weather" layer of the atmosphere at a
pressure of P = 10 Bars and denote it as r = R−δ. Con-
sequently, the "inert" layer of the atmosphere is between
100 (cid:46) P (cid:46) 10 Bars. A computed electrical conductiv-
ity profile for HD209458b is presented in figure (2), along
with a simplified conductivity profile resulting from equa-
tion (2). Because the functional profiles (dashed curve)
are in good agreement with the numerically computed
profile, we utilize them in all future calculations (see ap-
pendix).
3. ANALYTICAL THEORY
Global circulation models (Showman et al. 2008, 2009;
Langton & Laughlin 2008; Menou & Rauscher 2009)
have shown that winds on hot Jupiters, specifically
HD209458b and HD189733b, can attain velocities of or-
der v ∼ 1km/s.
It appears that two qualitative wind
In the upper atmosphere (P (cid:46)
patterns are present.
30mbars), wind flows from the sub-stellar point to the
anti-stellar point symmetrically across the terminator.
Deeper down, a strong eastward zonal jet develops. Im-
portantly, the development of zonal jets have been ob-
served in virtually all simulations (see Showman et al.
(2009) for a comprehensive review).
Puffy Magnetic EGP's
3
Fig. 3. -- Side view cross-section of induced current due to zonal
wind flow. The interior vector field, plotted with small arrows,
is a quantitative result of the model. The large semi-transparent
arrows are illustrations. The yellow shell in the inset represent
the region to which we confine the zonal flow (10-0.03 Bars). The
orange region denotes the region of interior heating.
r:
P =
(cid:90) (cid:90) (cid:90)
(cid:126)J 2
σ(r)
dV.
(8)
In order to satisfy continuity, the magnitude of the cur-
rent density must be constant along its path in the inte-
rior. As a result, it is apparent from the above equation
that most of the dissipation takes place in the upper lay-
ers of the planet, where conductivity is not too great, and
the solution is insensitive to the details of the conductiv-
ity profile in the deep interior, as long as it remains high.
The Ohmic heat that is generated in the convective enve-
lope of the planet replaces gravitational contraction, and
is lost by radiative cooling at the radiative/convective
boundary. Consequently, to ensure a null secular cool-
ing rate, we need the Ohmic dissipation rate to at least
compensate for the the radiative heat flux at the radia-
tive/convective boundary (Clayton 1968).
(6)
Prior to obtaining a formal solution to the problem,
we can identify some of its features. First, if the planet's
dipole moment is aligned with the rotation axis and we
consider only zonal flow, then there is azimuthal symme-
try. Second, it is immediately apparent from the geome-
try of the zonal jet and the dipole field that the induced
current will be meridional. In the atmosphere, we expect
the current to flow from the poles to the equator where
it penetrates the interior of the planet and completes the
loop (Fig 3).
The general induction equation can be written as:
(cid:16)(cid:126)∇ × (cid:126)B
(cid:17)
+ (cid:126)∇ ×(cid:16)
(cid:126)v × (cid:126)B
(cid:17)
∂ (cid:126)B
∂t
= −(cid:126)∇ × λ
,
(4)
where (cid:126)B is the magnetic field and λ ≡ 1/µ0σ is the mag-
netic diffusivity (Moffatt 1978). We express the magnetic
field as a dipole background component and an induced
component: (cid:126)B = (cid:126)Bdip + (cid:126)Bind with ∇× (cid:126)Bdip = 0. This as-
sumes no dynamo generation in the region. The induced
magnetic field will tend to point in the same direction
as the velocity field, so we can make the approximation
(cid:126)v × (cid:126)B ≈ (cid:126)v × (cid:126)Bdip. We assume that the prescribed veloc-
ity field and background magnetic field are not strongly
modified by the induced field i.e. Rm ≡ vL/λ (cid:46) 1, an as-
sumption satisfied in our models with T(cid:54) 1700K. Finally,
we seek a steady-state solution, so we require ∂ (cid:126)B/∂t = 0.
With these assumptions, the induction equation simpli-
fies to:
(cid:16)(cid:126)∇ × (cid:126)Bind
(cid:126)∇ × λ
(cid:126)v × (cid:126)Bdip
.
(5)
We can "uncurl" this equation and use Ampere's law
(cid:126)∇ × (cid:126)B = µ0 (cid:126)J to recover Ohm's law:
(cid:17)
(cid:17)
= (cid:126)∇ ×(cid:16)
(cid:16)−→v × −→
−→∇ · σ
(cid:16)−→v × −→
B dip − (cid:126)∇Φ
.
(cid:17)
(cid:17)
−→
J ind = σ
−→∇ · σ
−→∇Φ =
By continuity, ∇ · (cid:126)J must vanish. As a result,
B dip
.
(7)
4. MODEL RESULTS
If the conductivity takes on an exponential form, there
exists an analytical solution for Φ and in our models, we
confine the atmospheric flow to the region where conduc-
tivity is exponential. In the interior region, the electric
potential is also governed by the above equation, with the
right-hand side is set to zero. However, since the interior
conductivity does not take on a simple analytical form,
the above equation there must be solved numerically.
We take a nominal value for the "strength" of the field
at the surface of the planets to be BR = 10−3T, ap-
proximately the value expected from scaling the field via
the Elsasser number Λ ≡ σB2/2ρΩ ∼ 1, where Ω is the
planetary rotation rate (assumed tidally locked). The
magnetic field scaling argument based on energy flux
also suggests a similar value (Christensen et al. 2009).
For comparison, Jupiter's surface field is BRjup =
4.2×10−4T (Stevenson 2003). We approximate the zonal
wind as v ∝ vm sin(θ) φ where vm is the maximum speed
attained by the wind and set vm = 1 km/s (see appendix
for more details).
Once we have the solution for the current, we can com-
pute the total Ohmic dissipation rate below some radius
It has been shown that extra-solar gas giants require
between 10−6 and 10−2 of the irradiation they receive to
be deposited into the adiabatic interior to maintain their
radii (Bodenheimer et al. 2001; Burrows et al. 2007; Ibgui
et al. 2009), although the exact number depends on the
metallicity of the atmosphere and the mass of the heavy
element core in the interior of the planet. Under the as-
sumption of solar metallicity and no core, HD209458b
requires 3.9× 1018W, Tres-4b requires 8.06× 1020W and
HD189733b requires no heating at all (Burrows et al.
2007; Ibgui et al. 2009). Within the context of our model,
HD209458b and HD189733b are easily explained. To
adequately explain Tres-4b however, we require an en-
hanced (10×solar) metallicity in the atmosphere to re-
duce the required heating down to 5.37 × 1019W.
Table (1) presents a series of models with various tem-
peratures, Helium contents, and metallicities of the plan-
ets under consideration. Upon inspection, it is apparent
that the global heating rate scales exponentially with
temperature, and as a square root of the metallicity.
Both of these scalings can be easily understood by noting
that scaling the conductivity profile by a multiplicative
factor causes a corresponding change in dissipation while
4
Batygin & Stevenson
equations (1) and (2) relate temperature and metallicity
(i.e. f ) to the conductivity.
It is also noteworthy that the models with a simulated
core produce approximately the same amount of heating
as the coreless models. This is because most of the dis-
sipation takes place in a region where ionization of alkali
metals still dominates the electrical conductivity and the
somewhat hotter interior isentrope makes little difference
- recall that the value of the conductivity is unimportant
in the deep interior.
There are a number of other scalings present within our
model. For instance, the total Ohmic dissipation rate is
proportional to the squares of the wind speed and the
strength of the magnetic field, P ∝ (B/103T)2(vm/1km
s−1)2. Additionally, to leading order, the dissipation in
the atmosphere scales linearly with the thickness of the
atmosphere, while the interior dissipation approximately
scales quadratically. Consequently, along with the con-
ductivity effect, hotter atmospheres also lead to more
dissipation by virtue of a physically larger atmosphere.
It is important to understand that Ohmic heating does
not only affect the interior. Because the induced cur-
rent's "return path" lies in the atmosphere (Fig. 3), the
atmosphere also gets heated. This heating, along with
magnetic drag on the flow are the limiting factors of our
theory.
Consider the nominal case of HD209458b with Tiso =
1700K and Z = 1×solar. In this model, the heating re-
quired to inflate the planet is attained at a depth of ∼ 90
Bars, essentially at the radiative/convective boundary.
Ohmic heating in the atmosphere is small (only ∼ 4%)
in comparison with the irradiation, having little effect
on the planet's evolution or structure and Rm ∼ 0.3.
In other words, the assumptions implicit in our calcu-
lation are satisfied and the mechanism seems to explain
the transit radius adequately. However, if we go to the
model with Tiso = 2000K, Rm ∼ 3, the Ohmic dissipa-
tion in the atmosphere is comparable with the insolation,
and the assumptions of our model may no longer apply.
The nominal model of Tres-4b with Tiso = 2250K also
runs into the same problem. Here, Rm ∼ 15, and the
Ohmic dissipation in the atmosphere is again comparable
with the insolation. However, if we imagine that mag-
netic drag reduces the wind velocity by a factor of ∼ 3,
our results fall in the right ballpark to explain Tres-4b's
radius, in the scenario where its atmospheric opacity is
super-solar. Finally, consider the model of HD189733b.
For this configuration of parameters, our mechanism does
not predict a significant amount of Ohmic dissipation
at adiabatic depths, consistent with an un-inflated ra-
dius. A similar scenario is observed for the model of
HD209458b with Tiso = 1400K. Overall, it appears that
within the current setup of the model, the cumulative
heating below the weather layer of the atmosphere i.e.
r < R−δ is of order a few×10−2 of the heating that takes
place in the atmosphere. Provided that this ratio of mag-
nitudes holds up in a more dynamical treatment of the
problem, it can provide an upper limit to the maximum
inflation that can be explained with Ohmic dissipation.
5. DISCUSSION
In this letter, we have presented a new, magnetohy-
drodynamic mechanism for inflation of extrasolar gas gi-
ants. Our calculations show that the heating, necessary
to maintain the seemingly anomalous radii of transiting
exo-planets, naturally emerges from considerations of in-
teractions between partially ionized winds and the plane-
tary magnetic field. Interestingly, there seems to be a set
limit to the extent that Ohmic dissipation can heat the
interior, making this theory testable. Currently, there
is significant uncertainty with respect to the calculation
of the required interior heating, because core masses are
unknown. However, dynamical determinations of inte-
rior structure (Batygin et al. 2009; Ragozzine & Wolf
2009) may allow us to resolve the degeneracy for a frac-
tion of observed planets, and provide a solid test-bed for
the mechanism we've presented here.
There is a number of interesting additional questions
that our model inevitably brings up. First, recall that
our treatment of the induction equation is kinematic. In
reality, flow modification by the Lorenz force may play
an important role in determining the actual wind pat-
terns. While this effect may be small for HD209458b
and HD189733b, weather on hotter planets, such as Tres-
4b or Wasp-12b may be more intimately linked with
their magnetic fields, calling for a magentohydrodynamic
treatment of the atmospheric circulation. Generally,
when zonal winds interact with a background dipole field,
they give rise to poloidal current which in turn, gives rise
to a predominantly toroidal, unobservable field. How-
ever, the dayside-to-nightside flows that are present at
higher levels in the atmosphere may modify the flow in
an interesting way that may eventually be astronomically
observable.
Second, we are neglecting the stellar magnetic field.
The star's magnetic field is likely to be considerably
smaller than the planetary field at the planetary orbital
radius, but induction by stellar field as well as coupling
of the stellar and planetary magnetic field lines is cer-
tainly plausible. This too, may produce an astronomi-
cally observable signature. Finally, we are neglecting the
effects the induced current in the interior on the plan-
etary dynamo. Considerations of this sort may influ-
ence the background magnetic field of the planet. All of
these aspects call for a self-consistent treatment of the
full problem. Such calculations would no-doubt provide
further insight into the physical structure of extra-solar
gas giants.
We approximate the electrical conductivity profile in the atmosphere with exponential functions:
APPENDIX
(cid:40)
σ =
r−(R−δ)
Hδ
r−R
Hγ
σδe
σγe
R − δ < r (cid:54) R
R < r (cid:54) R + γ
(1)
where σδ and σγ are the conductivities at r = R − δ and r = R respectively, while Hδ and Hγ are the conductivity
scale-heights in the corresponding regions. We prescribe a parabolic radial dependence to the zonal flow over the
thickness of the atmosphere, δ, and maintain the velocity constant over the outermost thin shell, γ:
where
(cid:126)v =
0 < r (cid:54) R − δ
βvm sin θ φ R − δ < r (cid:54) R + γ
(cid:26)0
(cid:40)(cid:16) r−( R−δ)
(cid:17)2
β =
δ
1
R − δ < r (cid:54) R
R < r (cid:54) R + γ
(cid:18) sin θ
(cid:19)
r2
5
(2)
(3)
(5)
Puffy Magnetic EGP's
TABLE 1
Ohmic dissipation acquired at various pressures in various models of HD209458b, Tres-4b, and HD189733b
Planet
HD209458b
HD209458b
HD209458b
HD209458b
HD209458b
HD209458b
HD209458b
HD209458b
HD209458b
HD209458b
HD209458b
HD209458b
Tres-4b
Tres-4b
Tres-4b
Tres-4b
Tres-4b
Tres-4b
HD189733b
Y
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
Tiso (K) Z (×solar)
1400
1400
1700
1700
2000
2000
1400
1400
1700
1700
2000
2000
2000
2250
2500
2000
2250
2500
1500
1
10
1
10
1
10
1
10
1
10
1
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
P [P < 10 Bars] (W)
2.30 × 1019
7.28 × 1019
1.14 × 1021
3.61 × 1021
1.22 × 1022
3.89 × 1022
2.22 × 1019
7.01 × 1019
6.97 × 1020
2.21 × 1021
1.38 × 1022
4.52 × 1022
6.87 × 1022
1.44 × 1023
4.62 × 1023
4.80 × 1022
1.98 × 1023
5.13 × 1023
9.94 × 1018
P [P > 10 Bars] (W)
2.23 × 1017
7.06 × 1017
1.01 × 1019
3.19 × 1019
3.24 × 1020
1.05 × 1021
1.30 × 1017
4.10 × 1017
7.67 × 1018
2.43 × 1019
3.13 × 1020
1.05 × 1021
2.57 × 1021
3.33 × 1021
7.87 × 1021
9.56 × 1020
5.92 × 1021
8.75 × 1021
2.65 × 1016
P [P > 100 Bars] (W)
1.09 × 1016
3.43 × 1016
5.60 × 1017
1.77 × 1018
7.09 × 1019
2.29 × 1020
9.18 × 1014
2.89 × 1015
8.02 × 1017
1.90 × 1018
4.05 × 1019
9.42 × 1019
1.42 × 1020
3.68 × 1020
1.54 × 1021
3.16 × 1019
6.16 × 1020
1.55 × 1021
1.00 × 1016
zero:
g(cid:48)
γ(R + γ) =
Assuming alignment of the dipole moment and the rotation axis, the background dipole magnetic field can be expressed
as follows:
(cid:126)Bdip = (cid:126)∇ × k
φ.
(4)
With these expressions, we can decompose the angular part of (cid:126)v × (cid:126)B into spherical harmonics. Upon inspection, one
finds that the only harmonic of interest has (cid:96) = 2 and m = 0. Consequently, we write the potential as Φ = g(r)Y 0
2 (θ, φ)
and equation (7) becomes a scalar equation.
Because the outer edge of our models is set at an insulating shell, we require the radial current at r = R + γ to be
5
4kvm
3(R + γ)3 .
(cid:114) π
σ−1dr (cid:29) R(cid:82) π
γ − 6Hγ(R + γ) + (R + γ)2(cid:1)
Hγ
2
R
reads:
gγ(r) =
− R+r+γ
This boundary condition is appropriate when the electrical resistance that the current will encounter radially, greatly
0 σ−1dθ. This criterion is satisfied in our models.
With this boundary condition, the radial part of the solution to equation (7) in the outermost shell (R < r (cid:54) R + γ)
90Hγr3(cid:0)1 − 4Hγ + 6H 2
exceeds that of a path confined to a surface i.e. (cid:82) R+2γ
(cid:1)(cid:0)12H 2
(cid:1) (6H 2
(cid:0)1 − 4Hγ + 6H 2
γ + 6Hγ(R + γ) + (R + γ)2(cid:1) A1),
γ r + 6Hγr2 − r3(cid:1)(cid:0)12H 2
δ r − 6Hδr2 + r3(cid:1)
√
γ (2R − 5r + 2γ)
× (12
− 2Hγ(R2 − 3Rr − 3r2 + 2Rγ − 3rγ + γ2) − r(r2 + (R + γ)2))
− 30e
+ 5e
γ − 6Hγ(R + γ) + (R + γ)2)A1
γ (4Hγ + r)(12H 2
γ − 18H 2
Hγ H 2
Hγ (cid:0)24H 3
(cid:0)−24H 3
where A1 is an undetermined constant of integration. In a similar fashion, we can write down the solution to the radial
part of equation (7) in the region (R − δ < r (cid:54) R):
5πkvme
R+r+γ
Hγ Hγ
(6)
R+γ
r
e
γ
γ
gδ(r) =
5A2
1
15r3 (
δ + 18H 2
6H 2
δ − 4Hδ + 1
− 5A3Hδe
6H 2
Hδ (4Hδ + r)
− r
δ − 4Hδ + 1
6
Batygin & Stevenson
(cid:18) r
(cid:19)
Hδ
δ r − 6Hδr2 + r3) log(r)
δ + 18H 2
+ e
r
Hδ
√
− r
Hδ
5πkvme
− 2
δ2
× (−192H 3
δ + 96H 2
− 2Hδ(12r2 + R2 − δ2) + r(4rR − R2 + δ2))),
(12H 2
δ r + 2(−24H 3
δ (4Hδ + r)Ei
where A2 and A3 are again undetermined constants, and Ei is an exponential integral: Ei(x) =(cid:82) x
t dt. Although
equation (7) must be solved numerically in the interior, towards the center of the planet, where conductivity can
be taken to be constant, it reduces to Laplace's equation. As a result we can use the polynomial eigenfunction
gint(r) = A4r2 in the vicinity of the origin, and A4 is the last undetermined constant. The four constants of integration
are determined by continuity.
−∞ et
(7)
Acknowledgments We thank G. Laughlin, D. Charbonneau, A. Showman, J. Liu, H. Knutson, A. Wolf and M.
Line for useful discussions.
REFERENCES
Batygin, K., Bodenheimer, P., & Laughlin, G. 2009, ApJ, 704,
Knutson, H. A., Charbonneau, D., Burrows, A., O'Donovan,
L49
Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., & Barman, T. 2010, Reports on
Progress in Physics, 73, 016901
Bodenheimer, P., Lin, D. N. C., & Mardling, R. A. 2001, ApJ,
548, 466
F. T., & Mandushev, G. 2009, ApJ, 691, 866
Langton, J., & Laughlin, G. 2008, ApJ, 674, 1106
Lodders, K. 1999, ApJ, 519, 793
Menou, K., & Rauscher, E. 2009, ApJ, 700, 887
Moffatt, H. K. 1978, Cambridge, England, Cambridge University
Bodenheimer, P., Laughlin, G., & Lin, D. N. C. 2003, ApJ, 592,
Press, 1978. 353 p.,
555
Burrows, A., Hubeny, I., Budaj, J., & Hubbard, W. B. 2007, ApJ,
661, 502
Ragozzine, D., & Wolf, A. S. 2009, ApJ, 698, 1778
Saumon, D., Chabrier, G., & van Horn, H. M. 1995, ApJS, 99, 713
Showman, A. P., Y-K. Cho, J., & Menou, K. 2009,
Burrows, A., Hubeny, I., Budaj, J., Knutson, H. A., &
arXiv:0911.3170
Charbonneau, D. 2007, ApJ, 668, L171
Showman, A. P., Cooper, C. S., Fortney, J. J., & Marley, M. S.
Burrows, A., Sudarsky, D., & Hubbard, W. B. 2003, ApJ, 594, 545
Borucki, W. J., et al. 2009, Science, 325, 709
Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., & Mayor, M.
2000, ApJ, 529, L45
Christensen, U. R., Holzwarth, V., & Reiners, A. 2009, Nature,
457, 167
Clayton, D. D. 1968, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968
Cox, A. N., Becker, S. A., & Pesnell, W. D. 2000, Allen's
Astrophysical Quantities, 499
Fortney, J. J., & Nettelmann, N. 2009, Space Science Reviews,
108
Fortney, J. J., Shabram, M., Showman, A. P., Lian, Y., Freedman,
R. S., Marley, M. S., & Lewis, N. K. 2010, ApJ, 709, 1396
Guillot, T., & Showman, A. P. 2002, A&A, 385, 156
Henry, G. W., Marcy, G. W., Butler, R. P., & Vogt, S. S. 2000,
ApJ, 529, L41
2008, ApJ, 682, 559
Showman, A. P., Fortney, J. J., Lian, Y., Marley, M. S.,
Freedman, R. S., Knutson, H. A., & Charbonneau, D. 2009,
ApJ, 699, 564
Spiegel, D. S., Silverio, K., & Burrows, A. 2009, ApJ, 699, 1487
Stevenson, D. J. 2003, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 208, 1
Tipler, P. A., & Llewellyn, R. 2002, Modern Physics, 4th edition,
by Paul A. Tipler and Ralph Llewellyn. W. H. Freeman
Publishers, ISBN 0-71674345-0, 700pp, 2002.,
Ibgui, L., Spiegel, D. S., & Burrows, A. 2009, arXiv:0910.5928
Winn, J. N., & Holman, M. J. 2005, ApJ, 628, L159
|
1310.0482 | 1 | 1310 | 2013-10-01T20:26:45 | Analysis of a superbolide from a Damocloid observed over Spain on July 13, 2012 | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | A superbolide with an estimated absolute magnitude of -20+-1 was seen on July 13, 2012 over the center and south of Spain. This extraordinary event, which was witnessed by numerous casual observers, was recorded in the framework of the continuous fireball monitoring and meteor spectroscopy campaign performed by the SPanish Meteor Network (SPMN). Thus, because of optimal weather conditions, the bolide was imaged from ten meteor observing stations. Here we present the analysis of this magnificent event, which is the brightest fireball ever recorded by our team. The atmospheric trajectory of the bolide and the orbit in the Solar System of the parent meteoroid were obtained. The emission spectrum produced during the ablation of this particle is also discussed. We found that the meteoroid, which was following a Halley Type Comet orbit, was depleted in Na and had a tensile strength one order of magnitude higher than that corresponding to typical cometary materials. By means of orbital analysis tools we have investigated the likely parent body of this particle and the results suggest that the progenitor is a damocloid. The impact area of the hypothetical remnants of the meteoroid is also given and a search for meteorites was performed, but none were found. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph | Analysis of a superbolide from a Damocloid observed
over Spain on July 13, 2012
José M. Madiedo1, 2, Josep M. Trigo-Rodríguez3, Jaime Zamorano4, José L. Ortiz5,
Alejandro Sánchez de Miguel4, Francisco Ocaña4, Jaime Izquierdo 4, Alberto J.
Castro-Tirado5, Nicolás Morales5, David Galadí6, Enrique de Guindos6, Juan
Lacruz7, Faustino Organero8, Leonor Ana-Hernández8, Fernando Fonseca8, Mar
Tapia9, Felipe Gallego2 and Jesús Cabrera-Caño2
1Depto. de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, Facultad de Física, Universidad de
Sevilla, 41012 Sevilla, Spain.
2Facultad de Ciencias Experimentales, Universidad de Huelva, Avda. de las Fuerzas
Armadas S/N. 21071 Huelva, Spain.
3Institute of Space Sciences (CSIC-IEEC). Campus UAB, Facultat de Ciències, Torre
C5-p2. 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.
4Depto. de Astrofísica y CC. de la Atmósfera, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas, Universidad
Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
5Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, CSIC, Apt. 3004, 18080 Granada, Spain.
6Centro Astronómico Hispano-Alemán, Calar Alto (CSIC-MPG), E-04004 Almería,
Spain.
7La Cañada Observatory (MPC J87), Ávila, Spain.
8Observatorio Astronómico de La Hita, La Puebla de Almoradiel, Toledo, Spain.
9Laboratori d’Estudis Geofísics Eduard Fontseré (LEGEF), IEC, Barcelona, Spain.
Accepted for publication in
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (MNRAS)
on Sept. 26, 2013
ABSTRACT
A superbolide with an estimated absolute magnitude of -20±1 was seen on July 13,
2012 over the center and south of Spain. This extraordinary event, which was witnessed
by numerous casual observers, was recorded in the framework of the continuous fireball
monitoring and meteor spectroscopy campaign performed by the SPanish Meteor
Network (SPMN). Thus, because of optimal weather conditions, the bolide was imaged
from ten meteor observing stations. Here we present the analysis of this magnificent
event, which is the brightest fireball ever recorded by our team. The atmospheric
trajectory of the bolide and the orbit in the Solar System of the parent meteoroid were
obtained. The emission spectrum produced during the ablation of this particle is also
1
discussed. We found that the meteoroid, which was following a Halley Type Comet
orbit, was depleted in Na and had a tensile strength one order of magnitude higher than
that corresponding to typical cometary materials. By means of orbital analysis tools we
have investigated the likely parent body of this particle and the results suggest that the
progenitor is a damocloid. The impact area of the hypothetical remnants of the
meteoroid is also given and a search for meteorites was performed, but none were
found.
KEYWORDS: meteorites, meteors, meteoroids, comets.
1 INTRODUCTION
At 0h04m52.6±0.1s UTC on July 13, 2012 an exceptionally bright fireball was observed
across the center and south of the Iberian Peninsula. It was named "Belmonte de Tajo",
since its maximum brightness was reached when the bolide was located next to the
zenith of this town, at about 45 km southeast of Madrid. The event, which lasted around
3 seconds, was witnessed by numerous casual observers, mostly from their homes.
Some of these reported a strong thunder-like sound heard a few seconds after the
luminous phase of the event took place. Most witnesses also claimed that night
suddenly turned into day during a fraction of a second. This, in fact, could be confirmed
by our fireball monitoring systems. Thus, because of optimal weather conditions, the
event was imaged from eight meteor observing stations operated by the SPanish Meteor
Network and by one camera operating at the Calar Alto Astronomical Observatory
(Table 1). Additional images were provided by the cameras operated by DGT (the
Spanish Traffic Service). In this way, we could confirm that the event fell within the
superbolide category (Ceplecha et al. 1999), since the photometric analysis of our video
recordings showed that the bolide reached an absolute magnitude of -20±1 at its
brightest phase. This fireball is, in addition, the brightest event ever recorded by our
network as the also extraordinary Bejar bolide appeared on July 11, 2008 reached an
absolute magnitude of -18 (Trigo-Rodríguez et al. 2009). Like in this previous case, the
opportunity of reconstructing the trajectory, radiant and orbital elements of the July 13,
2012 superbolide proves to be crucial to better understand the origin and dynamics of
meter-sized meteoroids orbiting the Sun. We also present the bulk chemistry of the
meteoroid producing this event from the analysis of its emission spectrum.
2
2 INSTRUMENTATION AND METHODS
The fireball was imaged from eight SPMN meteor observing stations: Sevilla, La Hita,
Huelva, El Arenosillo, Madrid, Villaverde del Ducado, Sierra Nevada and Ávila. It was
also recorded by a low-resolution video camera operating at Calar Alto. The
geographical coordinates of these observing stations are given in Table 1. SPMN
systems are based on high-sensitivity monochrome CCD video devices we employ to
monitor the night sky (models 902H and 902H Ultimate, from Watec Co.). These can
image meteor events with an apparent magnitude of around +3/+4, or brighter. Station
#1 also employs colour CCD video cameras. Although these were set up to monitor the
sky during the day, we usually keep them working also during the night to image events
with brightness higher than that corresponding to an apparent magnitude of about -4.
All of these CCD devices (monochrome and colour) operate according to the PAL video
standard. With this configuration, these cameras generate interlaced video sequences
with a frame rate of 25 fps and a resolution of 720x576 pixels (Trigo-Rodriguez et al.
2007; Madiedo & Trigo-Rodríguez 2008; Madiedo et al. 2010).
Some of our observing stations perform a continuous spectroscopic monitoring since
2006 to infer information about the chemical composition of meteoroids. For this
purpose we employ holographic diffraction gratings (500 or 1000 lines/mm, depending
on the device) attached to the objective lens of some of the above-mentioned cameras to
image the emission spectra resulting from the ablation of meteoroids in the atmosphere
(Madiedo et al. 2013a, 2013b, 2013c). Our video spectrographs can image spectra for
meteor events with brightness higher than the corresponding to an apparent magnitude
of around -4.
With respect to data reduction, we first deinterlaced the video sequences by separating
the even and odd fields contained in each video frame. Then, an astrometric
measurement was done by hand in order to obtain the plate (x, y) coordinates of the
fireball along its apparent path in the sky from each observing station. These astrometric
measurements were then introduced in the AMALTHEA software (Madiedo et al.
2011a), which transforms plate coordinates into equatorial coordinates by using the
position of reference stars appearing in the images. This follows the method of the
intersection of planes to obtain the position of the apparent radiant and the trajectory in
3
the atmosphere of multi-station meteors (Ceplecha 1987). Once these data are known,
the software computes the orbital parameters of the corresponding meteoroid by
following the procedure described in Ceplecha (1987).
On the other hand, the magnitude of the fireball was estimated from the photometric
analysis of the images recorded by our CCD video cameras. In general, we determine
the magnitude of meteor events by direct comparison of the brightness level of the
pixels along the meteor trail and those corresponding to the position of nearby stars.
However, since the event discussed here saturated the video frames containing its
brightest phase, a different approach was employed. Thus, we employed the images
taken by other cameras that did not contain the fireball in their field of view but,
however, did record the increase in brightness of the environment as a consequence of
the luminosity of the bolide. This brightness level was then compared to a previous
calibration performed by us where the luminosity of this environment as a consequence
of the different phases of the Moon during the night but also of the Sun at dawn and
sunset was measured. Then, by using this approach, the peak magnitude of this event
was obtained with an uncertainty of about ±1.
3 OBSERVATIONS: atmospheric path, radiant and orbit
The "Belmonte de Tajo" superbolide was included in our fireball database with the
SPMN code 130712. This code was given after the observing date. Because of its
extraordinary brightness, it was witnessed by many casual observers along Spain. In
fact, our video fireball monitoring cameras operating at the Sierra Nevada Astronomical
Observatory (Granada, Spain) recorded the shadows produced by the fireball at over
300 km from the epicentre of this event. Figures 1a to 1f show several images of this
bolide as recorded from observing stations #2 and #7 during the initial phase, half
position in the atmospheric path and maximum brightness of the fireball. The image
taken by the low-resolution camera operating at Calar Alto is shown in Figure 1h.
Some of the witnesses reported their observations to the SPMN website, via an online
form that is available for these purposes. Most of these casual observers commented
that the fireball had a greenish colour. This was confirmed by one of our fireball
monitoring cameras operating from Sevilla, since this device employs a colour CCD
sensor. These reports, however, did not contain accurate information about the
4
atmospheric trajectory of the bolide and so they were not used for the orbit
determination. So, the analysis of its trajectory and orbit was performed on the basis of
the images recorded from SPMN video stations.
The calculated parameters of the atmospheric trajectory of the superbolide are
summarized in Table 2. The preatmospheric velocity V∞ was found from the velocities
measured at the earliest part of the meteor trajectory. No deceleration was observed
between the initial height and ∼70 km. Taking this into account, the parent meteoroid
struck the atmosphere with an initial velocity V∞=22.6±0.3 km s-1. The fireball started
its luminous path at 100.4±0.5 km above the ground level and reached its maximum
brightness (corresponding to an absolute magnitude of -20±1) at a height of 36.7±0.5
km. The luminous phase ended at 35.4±0.5 km. The inclination of this trajectory was of
about 75º with respect to the ground and the position of the apparent radiant was
α=261.5±0.1º, δ=37.66±0.06º. With this information the heliocentric orbit in the Solar
System of the parent meteoroid was calculated. The corresponding orbital parameters
(J2000) are listed in Table 3 and the projection of this orbit on the ecliptic plane is
shown in Figure 1i. The calculated aphelion is Q=14±2 AU and the revolution period
yields P=20.1±4.0 yr, with a Tisserand parameter with respect to Jupiter TJ=1.8±0.1.
Thus, although these data satisfy the conditions imposed to Halley Type Comet (HTC)
orbits (P>20yr and TJ<2), the orbit of the meteoroid can be regarded as a limiting case
between those of Jupiter Family (JFC) and HTC.
4 DISCUSSION
4.1 Light curve and preatmospheric mass
A photometric analysis was performed on the video frames containing the fireball. From
this we have obtained the evolution with time of the luminosity of this deep-penetrating
bolide. The resulting light curve is plotted in Figure 4. This reveals that the fireball
experienced several bright flares during the second half of its atmospheric trajectory,
between t=1.6 and t=2.6 seconds. This behaviour is exhibited by compact meteoroids
(Murray et al. 1999; Campbell et al. 2000), while for dustball meteoroids these flares
take place earlier (Hawkes & Jones 1975). The last of these events, which is also the
brightest one, corresponds to the violent disruption of the meteoroid at the end of the
luminous trajectory.
5
The light curve has been employed to infer the initial (preatmospheric) mass of the
meteoroid. For this purpose, the classical meteor luminous equation has been used:
m=2
t
b
∫
t
e
v/(I
τ
2
)dt
(1)
(2)
Here I is the measured luminosity of the fireball, which is given as a function of the
absolute magnitude M by means of the relationship
I=10 -0.4·M
For the calculation of the luminous efficiency (τ), which depends on velocity (v) we
have employed the equations given by Ceplecha & McCrosky (1976). In this way, the
initial mass of the meteoroid yields 1700±500 kg. According to this, the diameter of this
particle would range from 1.1±0.1 m to 0.9±0.1 m for a bulk density of 2.4 g cm-3 and
3.7 g cm-3, respectively. Since even meter-sized meteoroids produced by comets are
completely disintegrated at high altitudes in the atmosphere (Madiedo et al. 2013d), the
deep penetration ability of the "Belmonte de Tajo" meteoroid indicates that this particle
was tougher than ordinary cometary meteoroids.
4.2 Tensile strength
The compactness of the meteoroid inferred from the photometric behaviour of the
fireball can be confirmed by estimating the tensile strength of the particle. Thus, the
bolide exhibited several flares along its atmospheric trajectory as a consequence of the
successive break-ups suffered by the meteoroid. These can be noticed in the light curve
plotted in Figure 2. However, the violent disruption of the meteoroid took place by the
end of the luminous phase where the major flare was produced and the event reached its
maximum brightness. Previous flares were not catastrophic, since the meteoroid
continued penetrating in the atmosphere. The equation given by Bronshten (1981) can
be employed to estimate the tensile (aerodynamic) strength S at which these flares took
place:
6
(3)
S=ρatm·v2
This aerodynamic strength S can be used as an estimation of the tensile strength of the
meteoroid (Trigo-Rodriguez & Llorca 2006, 2007). In this relationship v is the velocity
of the meteoroid at the break-up point and ρatm is the atmospheric density at the height
where the flare takes place. We have calculated this density by means of the US
standard atmosphere model (U.S. Standard Atmosphere 1976). Table 4 shows the
values of the aerodynamic strength for the different flares highlighted in Figure 2. The
corresponding heights and velocities are also indicated. From this analysis we found
that the value obtained for the final flare, (3.1±0.6)·107 dyn cm-2, is 2 orders of
magnitude higher than the typical tensile strengths of ~105 dyn cm-2 exhibited by tough
meteoroids with a cometary origin (Trigo-Rodriguez and Llorca 2006, 2007), but
similar
to
those found for stony meteoroids (Consolmagno and Britt 1998;
Consolmagno et al. 2006, 2008; Macke et al. 2011).
4.3 Analysis of the emission spectrum
Three video spectrographs operating from stations #2, #5 and #6 in Table 1 recorded the
emission spectrum produced during the ablation of the meteoroid in the atmosphere. We
have employed our CHIMET software to process these spectra (Madiedo et al. 2011b).
Thus, the video files containing the emission spectrum were first deinterlaced by
separating even and odd video fields, so that a new video sequence was produced from
them. Then, the resulting video file was dark-frame substracted and flat-fielded. A
calibration in wavelengths was then performed with by identifying typical lines
appearing in meteor spectra and, finally, the signal was corrected by taking into account
the spectral efficiency of the spectrograph. The resulting spectrum is shown in Figure 3,
where multiplet numbers are given according to Moore (1945). As can be seen, the
signal is dominated by a strong emission from Mg I-2 (517.2 nm) and several Fe I
multiplets: Fe I-41 (441.5 nm) and Fe I-15 (526.9 and 542.9 nm). In the ultraviolet, the
intensity of H and K lines of ionized calcium is also strong. The contribution from Na I-
1 is, however, very small, revealing a depletion of sodium in the meteoroid. The
emission from atmospheric N2 bands can also be noticed in the red region.
7
Once the main emission lines were identified, the relative abundances were calculated.
Thus, a software application was used to reconstruct a synthetic spectrum by adjusting
the temperature (T) in the meteor plasma, the column density of atoms (N), the damping
constant (D), and the surface area (P) from the observed brightness of lines as explained
in Trigo-Rodríguez et al. (2003). First, since Fe I emission lines are well distributed all
over the spectrum, they were used to set the parameters capable to fit the observed
spectrum with the synthetic one (Trigo-Rodríguez et al. 2003, 2004). The modelled
spectrum of the meteor column is then compared line by line with the observed one to
fit all its peculiarities. Thus, once the parameters T, D, P and N are fixed, the relative
abundances of the main rocky elements relative to Fe are found by performing an
iterative process until an optimal fit is achieved. To obtain the elemental abundances
relative to Si, we have considered Fe/Si=1.16 (Anders and Grevesse 1989). The results
are summarized in Table 5, where these relative abundances are compared with those
found for other undifferentiated bodies in the Solar System, such as comet 1P/Halley
and the CI and CM groups of carbonaceous chondrites (Jessberger et al. 1988;
Rietmeijer & Nuth 2000; Rietmeijer 2002; Trigo-Rodríguez et al. 2003). Overall, the
computed abundances suggest that the main rock-forming elements were available in
proportions close to those found for comet 1P/Halley, but some small differences
suggest that perhaps we were in front of not yet sampled solar system materials. In
particular, the SPMN130712 meteoroid exhibited a very significant depletion in Na.
4.4 Orbital analysis: parent body
The results obtained from the analysis of the photometric behaviour and the emission
spectrum of the "Belmonte de Tajo" superbolide show the existence of tough
meteoroids depleted in Na moving in cometary orbits. We have employed the orbital
elements inferred from the analysis of this superbolide to find the likely parent body of
this meteoroid
among
the
objects
currently
listed
in
the NeoDys
(http://newton.dm.unipi.it/neodys/)
Center
Planet
Minor
the
and
(http://www.minorplanetcenter.org/iau/mpc.html) databases. One of the advantages of
finding the parent body is the possibility to establish a correlation with the physical and
chemical properties of the meteoroid and those of its progenitor. For this purpose, we
have employed the ORAS software (ORbital Association Software), which can perform
a link between meteoroids and their potential progenitor bodies on the basis of
dissimilarity criteria (a review about this topic is given in Williams (2011)). In this way,
8
the value of the so-called dissimilarity function, which measures the "distance" between
the orbit of the meteoroid and that of the potential parent body, is obtained. Thus, a link
can be established if this distance is below a predefined cut-off value. This software,
which is described in detail in Madiedo et al. (2013a), can employ the different
dissimilarity criteria proposed by Southworth and Hawkins (1963), Drummond (1981),
Jopek (1993), Valsecchi et al. (1999) and Jenniskens (2008). However, no parent body
was found, which means that either the progenitor is not yet catalogued or the link with
the parent body is broken because of the differences in orbital elements arisen during
the evolution of the orbit of the progenitor and the meteoroid (Vaubaillon et al. 2006).
Since the specific parent body could not be determined, we have employed a different
approach in order to infer more information about the nature and past history of the
progenitor and, in this way, try to explain some of the physical properties calculated for
the SPMN130712 meteoroid. Thus, we have analyzed the evolution of the orbit of this
particle by integrating backwards in time its orbital elements by means of the Mercury 6
symplectic integrator (Chambers 1999). In fact, a lower perihelion at an earlier epoch
could explain the inferred Na depletion and high tensile strength on the basis of the
sublimation of volatiles. This situation is found, for instance, for Geminid meteoroids,
where their low volatile content is thought to be due to the low perihelion distance
(q=0.14 AU) of this stream (Čapek & Borovička 2009). Besides, meteoroids with q<0.1
(as, for instance, the δ-Aquariids) are found to have Na-free properties (Kasuga et al.
2006).
For this calculation, the gravitational fields of Venus, the Earth-Moon system, Mars,
Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune and Pluto were considered. In order to take into
account the uncertainty in the orbital elements of the meteoroid, a set of 100 clones was
created around the orbit of this particle. Their orbital elements were spread within the
error bars determined for the orbit of the meteoroid and at the 3-sigma confidence
interval. The orbits were integrated back for 5·105 years. This analysis reveals that only
three clones exhibited a decrease of the perihelion distance below 0.14 AU after a time
period ranging between 45,000 and 80,000 years, reaching values below 0.03 AU.
Because of thermal desorption of alkali silicates, at such small distances from the Sun
mm-sized meteoroids are depleted in Na, but also in Fe and Mg as a consequence of the
sublimation of additional minerals containing these elements (Kasuga et al. 2006).
9
However, this should be taken with caution here, as we could expect that for meter-
sized meteoroids such as SPMN130712 thermal desorption is not so effective.
Nevertheless, if we admit that thermal desorption at low perihelion distances was able
of sublimating Na containing minerals in the SPMN130712 meteoroid, we should also
admit that such mechanism must decrease, at least to a significant extent, the Fe and Mg
contents. Since these additional depletions are not observed in the emission spectrum,
we conclude that the orbits of clones exhibiting a small perihelion distance, which are
also minority, do not account for the physical properties inferred for the SPMN130712
meteoroid. On the contrary, most clones (92 out of 100) exhibited an increase of the
semimajor axis and orbital eccentricity. As a consequence of this, the aphelion of these
clones was placed between 90 and 130 AU after a time period ranging between 50,000
and 440,000 years in the past. The perihelion distance also increased or remained of the
order of 1 AU for these of clones. On dynamical grounds, these orbits correspond to
either Halley Type Comets or Long Period Comets, but as previously mentioned the
strength of cometary materials is much lower than the tensile strength inferred for the
SPMN130712 meteoroid (Trigo-Rodriguez & Llorca 2006, 2007; Trigo-Rodríguez and
Blum 2009). There are, however, other minor bodies in the Solar System which are
known to follow HTC orbits: the damocloids. The Tisserand parameter with respect to
Jupiter of the damocloids, whose archetypal object is 5335 Damocles, is not larger than
2 (Jewitt 2005). According to the JPL Small Body Database (http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/),
only 88 minor bodies are currently identified as damocloid candidates, although most of
them have poorly defined orbits (with an arc-span below 30 days). The fact that the
SPMN130712 meteoroid originated from a damocloid would explain the low Na
content and high tensile strength determined from the analysis of the "Belmonte de
Tajo" superbolide. Thus, the damocloids are considered to be nuclei of dead Halley-
family and long-period comets and, so, they are depleted in volatiles (Jewitt 2005;
Jewitt et al. 2008; Fernández et al. 2005; Toth 2006). According to an alternative
scenario proposed to explain the origin of the damocloids, the source of some of these
bodies is probably associated with the sweeping resonances found in the Nice model
(Gomes et al. 2005; Morbidelli et al. 2005, 2010). The large movement of the giant
planets about 4.1 to 3.9 Gyrs ago caused powerful orbital resonances to sweep across
the asteroid belt, causing a significant mass depletion of bodies in the belt (Bottke et al.
2012; Walsh et al. 2012). In this way, the dynamic evolution and disruption of asteroids
in these unusual high-inclination orbits could be the source of the damocloids, but the
10
present population of these asteroids moving in HTC orbits could be a minor remnant of
its importance in the past due to the fact that they were mostly destined to bombard the
terrestrial planets long time ago (Morbidelli et al. 2010).
4.5 Dark flight and field search
Because of the size of the event and the penetration of the fireball till a final altitude of
about 35 km, the survival of fragments that could be recovered as meteorites on the
ground was not dismissed. So, the dark flight of these fragments was modelled by
means of the AMALTHEA software, which performs this analysis by following the
procedure described in (Ceplecha 1987). Atmospheric data provided by AEMET (the
Spanish meteorological agency) were used to include wind effects in the calculations.
Because of the violent disruption of the meteoroid by the end of the luminous phase, we
expected that most of the surviving fragments would be small, with a mass below
several tens of grams. Since the inclination of the trajectory with respect to the ground
was of about 75º, these, however, would be dispersed over a relatively small area on the
ground. The shape of these fragments was supposed to be spherical and a value of the
drag coefficient Γ=0.51 was considered. According to this, the landing point would be
located around the geographical coordinates 40.1º N, 3.2º W. Yet, despite several
expeditions were organized to the strewnfield, no meteorites were found.
5 CONCLUSIONS
We have analyzed a mag. -20±1 superbolide observed over Spain on July 13, 2012. Our
main conclusions are listed below:
1) The meteoroid, with an estimated initial mass of 1,700±500 kg and a diameter of
about 1 meter, penetrated the atmosphere till a final height of 35.4±0.5 above the
ground level. By that point, it experienced a very intense flare as a consequence
of the sudden disruption of the body.
2) The tensile strength of the meteoroid was estimated by calculating the
aerodynamic pressure at the disruption point. The result supports the existence
of high-strength meteoroids moving in cometary orbits.
3) The analysis of the emission spectrum produced by the fireball provided the
elemental abundances of the main rocky elements in the meteoroid. This
11
spectrum indicates that the meteoroid was quite poor in Mg and exhibited a very
significant depletion in Na. Overall, the computed abundances suggest that the
main rock-forming elements were available in proportions close to those found
for comet 1P/Halley, but some small differences might suggest that we were in
front of still non sampled solar system materials.
4) The specific parent body of the meteoroid could not be established by
performing a search through the minor bodies currently listed in the NeoDys and
Minor Planet Center databases. However, the integration backwards in time of
the orbital elements of the meteoroid suggests that the parent body is a
damocloid. So, the analysis of the "Belmonte de Tajo" fireball has provided an
insight into the physical properties of dead nuclei of HTCs.
5) Because of the size of the event and the terminal height of the luminous
trajectory, the survival of fragments as meteorites was considered and their
landing point was calculated. Several expeditions to the expected impact area
were organized, although no meteorites were found.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank AstroHita Foundation for its support in the establishment and operation of the
automated meteor observing station located at La Hita Astronomical Observatory (La
Puebla de Almoradiel, Toledo, Spain). We also acknowledge support from the Spanish
Ministry of Science and Innovation (projects AYA2009-13227, AYA2009-06330-E and
AYA2011-26522) and Junta de Andalucía (project P09-FQM-4555). We also thank
Dirección General de Tráfico for providing additional images of the event discussed in
the text.
REFERENCES
Anders E., Grevesse N., 1989, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 53, 197.
Bottke W.F. et al., 2012, Nature, 458, 78.
Bronshten V.A., 1981, Geophysics and Astrophysics Monographs. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Campbell M.D. et al., 2000, Meteorit. & Planet. Sci., 35, 1259.
12
Čapek D., Borovička J., 2009, Icarus, 202, 361.
Ceplecha Z., 1987, Bull. Astron. Inst. Cz., 38, 222.
Ceplecha Z. et al., 1999, Astron. Inst. Slovak Acad. Sci., Bratislava, 37-54.
Ceplecha Z. & McCrosky R.E., 1976, Journal of Geophysical Research, 81, 6257.
Consolmagno G.J. and Britt D.T., 1998, Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 33, 1231.
Consolmagno G.J., Macke R.J., Rochette P., Britt D.T., and Gattacceca J., 2006,
Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 41, 331.
Consolmagno G.J., Britt D.T., and Macke R.J., 2008, Chemie der Erde-Geochemistry,
68, 1.
Chambers J.E., 1999, MNRAS, 304, 793.
Drummond J.D., 1981, Icarus, 45, 545.
Fernández Y.R, Jewitt D., Sheppard S.S., 2005, AJ, 130, 308.
Gomes R., Levison H.F., Tsiganis K., Morbidelli A., 2005, Nature, 435, 466.
Hawkes R.L. & Jones J., 1975, MNRAS, 173, 339.
Jenniskens P., 2008, Icarus, 194, 13.
Jewitt D., 2005, AJ, 129, 530.
Jewitt D., Morbidelli A., Rauer H., 2008, Trans-Neptunian Objects and Comets,
Springer.
Jessberger E.K., Christoforidis A., Kissel J., 1988, Nature, 332, 691.
13
Jopek T.J., 1993, Icarus, 106, 603.
Kasuga T., Yamamoto T., Kimura H., Watanabe J., 2006, A&A, 453, L17.
Macke R.J., Consolmagno G.J., and Britt D.T. et al., 2011, Meteoritics & Planetary
Science, 46, 1842.
Madiedo J.M., Trigo-Rodríguez J.M., 2008, Earth Moon Planets, 102, 133.
Madiedo J.M., Trigo-Rodríguez J.M., Ortiz J.L., Morales N., 2010, Advances in
Astronomy, 2010, 1.
Madiedo J.M., Trigo-Rodríguez J.M., Lyytinen E., 2011a, NASA/CP-2011-216469,
330.
Madiedo J.M., Trigo-Rodríguez, J.M., Williams I.P., Ortiz J.L., Cabrera J., 2013a,
MNRAS, 431, 2464.
Madiedo J.M., Trigo-Rodríguez, J.M., Konovalova N., Williams I.P., Castro-Tirado
A.J., Ortiz J.L., Cabrera J., 2013b, MNRAS, 433, 571.
Madiedo J.M., Trigo-Rodríguez J.M., Lyytinen E., Dergham J., Pujols P., Ortiz J.L.,
Cabrera J., 2013c, MNRAS, 431, 1678.
Madiedo J.M. et al., 2013d, Icarus, submitted.
Moore C.E., 1945, In: A Multiplet Table of Astrophysical Interest. Princeton University
Observatory, Princeton, NJ. Contribution No. 20.
Morbidelli A. et al., 2005, Nature, 435, 462.
Morbidelli A. et al., 2010, Astron. J., 140, 1391.
14
Murray I.S., Hawkes R.L., Jenniskens P., 1999, Meteorit. & Planet. Sci., 34, 949.
Rietmeijer F. and Nuth J.A., 2000, Earth, Moon and Planets, 82-83, 325.
Rietmeijer F., 2002, Chemie der Erde, 62, 1.
Southworth R.B., Hawkins G.S., 1963, Smithson Contr. Astrophys., 7, 261.
Toth I., 2006, Proceedings of IAU Symposium No. 229, 67.
Trigo-Rodríguez J.M., Llorca J., 2007, Adv. Space Res., 29, 517.
Trigo-Rodríguez J.M., Blum J., 2009, Plan. Space Sci., 57, 243.
Trigo-Rodríguez J.M., Llorca J., Borovicka J., Fabregat J., 2003, Meteorit. Planet. Sci.,
38, 1283.
Trigo-Rodríguez J.M., Llorca J., 2006, MNRAS, 372, 655.
Trigo-Rodríguez J.M., Llorca J., 2007, MNRAS, 375, 415.
Trigo-Rodríguez J.M. et al., 2007, MNRAS, 382, 1933.
Trigo-Rodríguez J.M., Madiedo J.M., Williams I.P., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 394, 569.
U.S. Standard Atmosphere, 1976, NOA-NASA-USAF, Washington.
Valsecchi G., Jopek T., Froeschlé C., 1999, MNRAS, 304, 743.
Vaubaillon J., Lamy P., Jorda L., 2006, MNRAS, 370, 1841.
Walsh K.J. et al., 2012, MAPS, 47, 1941.
Williams I.P., 2011, A&G, 52, 2.20.
15
TABLES
Table 1. Geographical coordinates of the meteor observing stations involved in this
work.
Longitude (W) Latitude (N) Alt. (m)
05º 58' 50"
37º 20' 46"
28
674
39º 34' 06"
03º 11' 00"
06º 56' 11"
37º 15' 10"
25
2896
37º 03' 51"
03º 23' 05"
40
37º 06' 16"
06º 43' 58"
02º 29' 29"
41º 00' 04"
1100
640
40º 27' 03"
03º 43' 34"
04º 29' 30"
40º 36' 18"
1400
Station name
Sevilla
La Hita
Huelva
Sierra Nevada
El Arenosillo
Villaverde del Ducado
Madrid-UCM
Ávila
Station #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Table 2. Trajectory and radiant data for the SPMN130712 fireball (J2000).
Vh
Vg
He
Hb
V∞
δg
αg
(km/s)
(km/s)
(km)
(km)
(km/s)
(º)
(º)
100.4±0.5 35.4±0.5 258.5±0.1 36.98±0.07 22.6±0.3 19.8±0.3 40.3±0.3
Table 3. Orbital parameters (J2000) for the SPMN130712 fireball.
a (AU)
7.4±0.9
e
0.87±0.02
ω (º)
204.1±0.1
Ω (º)
110.8413±10-4
i (º)
25.6±0.3
Table 4. Aerodynamic pressure for flares and break-up processes highlighted in
Figure 3.
Velocity
(km s-1)
22.3±0.6
22.3±0.6
22.0±0.6
21.7±0.6
21.0±0.6
Aerodynamic pressure
(dyn cm-2)
(2.3±0.6)·106
(2.6±0.6)·106
(5.3±0.6)·106
(8.8±0.6)·106
(3.1±0.6)·107
Height
(km)
56±1
55±1
49±1
45±1
36±1
Flare
#
1
2
3
4
5
16
Table 5. Derived elemental abundances relative to Si of the SPMN130712 superbolide
compared with the inferred for other Solar System undifferentiated materials (Jessberger
et al. 1988; Rietmeijer & Nuth 2000; Rietmeijer 2002).
SPMN130712
1P/Halley
IDPs
CI chondrites
CM chondrites
Mg
0.48
0.54
0.85
1.06
1.04
Na
0.003
0.054
0.085
0.060
0.035
Ca
0.025
0.034
0.048
0.071
0.072
Mn
(×10-4)
40
30
150
90
60
Ni
(×10-3)
41
22
37
51
46
T
(K)
4700
-
-
-
-
17
FIGURES
Figure 1. Video frames showing the initial phase, half position in the atmospheric path
and maximum brightness of the fireball as imaged from La Hita Astronomical
Observatory - a), b) and c) - and Madrid - d), e) and f) -. g) Image taken from Calar
Alto. h) Apparent trajectory in the sky as seen from La Hita. i) Projection on the ecliptic
plane of the heliocentric orbit of the meteoroid.
18
.
)
-
(
y
t
i
s
n
e
t
n
I
1
0,9
0,8
0,7
0,6
0,5
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
0
5
4
1
2 3
0
0,5
1
1,5
time (s)
Figure 2. Light curve (relative pixel intensity vs. time) of the SPMN130712 fireball.
3,5
2,5
2
3
250
200
.
)
-
(
y
t
i
s
n
e
t
n
I
150
100
50
0
5
1
-
I
e
F
2
-
I
g
M
6
1
-
I
e
F
1
-
I
a
N
N2
1
4
-
I
e
F
Ca II-1
2
4
-
I
e
3
F
4
-
I
e
F
5
-
I
e
3
F
2
-
I
e
F
300
400
600
500
Wavelength (nm)
700
800
Figure 3. Calibrated emission spectrum of the SPMN130712 superbolide. Intensity is
expressed in arbitrary units.
19
|
1902.00036 | 1 | 1902 | 2019-01-31T19:04:07 | Scattered light shadows in warped protoplanetary discs | [
"astro-ph.EP"
] | Three-dimensional hydrodynamic numerical simulations have demonstrated that the structure of a protoplanetary disc may be strongly affected by a planet orbiting in a plane that is misaligned to the disc. When the planet is able to open a gap, the disc is separated into an inner, precessing disc and an outer disc with a warp. In this work, we compute infrared scattered light images to investigate the observational consequences of such an arrangement. We find that an inner disc misaligned by a less than a degree to the outer disc is indeed able to cast a shadow at larger radii. In our simulations a planet of around 6 Jupiter masses inclined by around 2 degrees is enough to warp the disc and cast a shadow with a depth of more than 10% of the average flux at that radius. We also demonstrate that warp in the outer disc can cause a variation in the azimuthal brightness profile at large radii. Importantly, this latter effect is a function of the distance from the star and is most prominent in the outer disc. We apply our model to the TW Hya system, where a misaligned, precessing inner disc has been invoked to explain an recently observed shadow in the outer disc. Consideration of the observational constraints suggest that an inner disc precessing due to a misaligned planet is an unlikely explanation for the features found in TW Hya. | astro-ph.EP | astro-ph |
MNRAS 000, 1 -- 13 (2015)
Preprint 4 February 2019
Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0
Scattered light shadows in warped protoplanetary discs
Rebecca Nealon1(cid:63), Christophe Pinte2, Richard Alexander1, Daniel Mentiplay2
and Giovanni Dipierro1
1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
2Monash Centre for Astrophysics (MoCA) and School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
Accepted XXX. Received YYY; in original form ZZZ
ABSTRACT
Three-dimensional hydrodynamic numerical simulations have demonstrated that the
structure of a protoplanetary disc may be strongly affected by a planet orbiting in a
plane that is misaligned to the disc. When the planet is able to open a gap, the disc is
separated into an inner, precessing disc and an outer disc with a warp. In this work, we
compute infrared scattered light images to investigate the observational consequences
of such an arrangement. We find that an inner disc misaligned by a less than a degree
to the outer disc is indeed able to cast a shadow at larger radii. In our simulations a
planet of (cid:38) 6MJ inclined by (cid:38) 2◦
is enough to warp the disc and cast a shadow with
a depth of (cid:38) 10% of the average flux at that radius. We also demonstrate that warp
in the outer disc can cause a variation in the azimuthal brightness profile at large
radii. Importantly, this latter effect is a function of the distance from the star and is
most prominent in the outer disc. We apply our model to the TW Hya system, where
a misaligned, precessing inner disc has been invoked to explain an recently observed
shadow in the outer disc. Consideration of the observational constraints suggest that
an inner disc precessing due to a misaligned planet is an unlikely explanation for the
features found in TW Hya.
Key words: accretion, accretion discs -- protoplanetary discs -- planet−disc inter-
actions -- submillimetre: planetary systems -- stars: individual: TW Hydrae
1 INTRODUCTION
Evidence is mounting that misalignments and warps in pro-
toplanetary discs are common. Strongly misaligned discs
present the most compelling examples, where the inner part
of the disc is misaligned to the outer disc. The inner disc
casts unique shadows on the outer disc, constraining the
relative inclination between the two (Min et al. 2017). Rela-
tive inclinations have been measured from 30◦ for DoAR 44
(Casassus et al. 2018) to 45◦ for AA Tau (Loomis et al.
2017), 70◦ for HD 142527 (Marino et al. 2015), 72◦ for
HD 100453 Benisty et al. (2017) and up to 80◦ for HD 100546
(Walsh et al. 2017). Numerical simulations suggested that
such an arrangement may be generated through gravita-
tional interaction with an inclined binary. For example, a
circumbinary disc may be broken into two discs and the inner
can cast asymmetric shadows onto the outer (Facchini et al.
2013, 2018; Zhu 2018). For the specific case of HD 143006,
Benisty et al. (2018) demonstrated that such a model re-
produces most of the observed features. Using HD 142527
as a case study, Price et al. (2018b) suggested that spiral
(cid:63) E-mail: [email protected]
© 2015 The Authors
arms, a cavity and shadows observed in some transition discs
could be explained with the presence of an inclined binary.
Characteristic disc structures including warps may also be
generated through the interaction with an inclined external
perturber, as in RW Aurigae system (Dai et al. 2015), MWC
758 (Dong et al. 2018) and as shown by Cuello et al. (2018).
Additionally, strongly misaligned discs may also be formed
during independent chaotic accretion episodes (Bate 2018).
Small to moderate misalignments have been invoked at
the innermost edge of the disc to explain observations of dip-
per stars, e.g. Ansdell et al. (2016) and recently by Pinilla
et al. (2018). These may be driven by stellar magnetic fields
that are misaligned to the disc, as in AA Tau (Donati et al.
2010; Bouvier et al. 1999) and LkCa 15 (Alencar et al. 2018).
Further evidence of misaligned discs is motivated by TW
Hya, where recent infrared (IR) observations identified a
variation of ∼ 20% in the surface brightness of the outer disc
that moved with a speed much faster than Keplerian at that
radius (Roberge et al. 2005; Debes et al. 2017; Poteet et al.
2018). Such an asymmetry is difficult to explain as TW Hya
is considered to be an isolated, single star system (Mamajek
2005; Gagn´e et al. 2017) -- broadly ruling out interactions
with external perturbers or the interaction of the disc with
2
R. Nealon et al.
a misaligned binary. Debes et al. (2017) suggested that the
feature in TW Hya may instead be caused by a misaligned,
inner disc that is casting a shadow on the outer disc. In this
interpretation the motion of the inner disc is governed by
a misaligned planet that causes the disc to be inclined and
rigidly precess, casting a shadow that moves with the pre-
cession rate of the inner disc. This model is consistent with
existing observations; a small warp or misalignment in the
inner region has been suggested (Qi et al. 2004; Pontoppi-
dan et al. 2008; Hughes et al. 2011, (cid:38) 10 au) and a planetary
companion may explain the inner disc cavity (Calvet et al.
2002; Andrews et al. 2016). Additionally, a small warp is
consistent with CO kinematics in the inner part of the disc
(Rosenfeld et al. 2012).
Numerical simulations have confirmed that this ar-
rangement may be possible, as the disc structure can be
altered by the influence of an inclined planet (Nealon et al.
2018; Zhu 2018). In the case that the planet is able to open
a gap, the initial disc is separated at the orbit of the planet
into an inner and outer disc. A warp forms across the orbit of
the planet, where a misalignment develops between the in-
ner and outer disc (Xiang-Gruess & Papaloizou 2013; Bitsch
et al. 2013; Nealon et al. 2018). Xiang-Gruess & Papaloizou
(2013) demonstrated that the inner (and, in their case outer)
disc tilt toward the orbit of the inclined planet. This be-
haviour is confirmed by Bitsch et al. (2013) who found that
the inner disc can achieve an inclination greater than that of
the planet orbit. Both of these works agree that the disc re-
sponds most rapidly when the planet is at moderate inclina-
tions (at inclinations ∼ the aspect ratio), rather than larger
inclinations. Recently, Nealon et al. (2018) conducted simi-
lar simulations with a larger outer disc radius (50 au rather
than ∼20 au). We showed that the larger outer disc moves
less under the influence of the misaligned planet, leading to
a larger relative misalignment between the inner and outer
disc. In the case that protoplanetary discs are larger than
∼20 au (Andrews & Williams 2007 and Ansdell et al. 2018,
but see Cieza et al. 2019 and van Terwisga et al. 2018), this
suggests that the inclinations between the inner and outer
disc found in the previous works represent underestimates.
Scattered light observations of protoplanetary discs are
the most important diagnostic to investigate the structural
properties of protoplanetary discs. The scattering emission
from small dust grains at the disc surface layer dominates
at short wavelengths, roughly from optical to near-infrared
(NIR) part of the spectrum. Small dust grains carry most
of the opacity at optical and near-infrared wavelengths,
and therefore control the stellar absorption and the dis-
ca A´Zs temperature (Hartmann 2009). Additionally, these
dust grains are expected to be well coupled with the gas
in the inner and intermediate disc regions and populate the
full vertical extent of the gas disc. Therefore, such obser-
vations can be considered a fundamental probe of the disc
vertical structure (see the review of Watson et al. 2007) and
can be used to infer the disc inclination, the shape of the
surface and detect features at the surface layer (e.g. induced
by gaps carved by planets, Jang-Condell & Turner 2012).
The observational consequences of a low inclination warp
in the inner disc have been explored by Arzamasskiy et al.
(2018), where they compared the IR scattered light profile in
the cases of an aligned and misaligned planet. In their inten-
sity maps, asymmetries due to the warp from the misaligned
planet were only observed in the inner regions of the disc.
However, the duration of their simulation is shorter than in
other works (e.g. Marzari & Nelson 2009; Xiang-Gruess &
Papaloizou 2013; Bitsch et al. 2013; Nealon et al. 2018), the
gap opened by the planet is not fully formed and the planet
is kept at on a fixed orbit. This scenario is distinct from that
invoked from observations of TW Hya, where the inner disc
must be cleanly separated from the outer disc such that it
can precess differentially.
In this paper we measure the observational conse-
quences in scattered light for a disc warped by an interac-
tion with a misaligned planet. We use the radiative transfer
code mcfost (Pinte et al. 2006, 2009) to generate scattered
light images from the simulations presented in Nealon et al.
(2018) (hereafter NDAMN18). In Section 2 we summarise
these simulations and our use of mcfost. In Section 3 we
present the scattered light results and examine the azimuthal
brightness profile in the intermediate and outer disc. In Sec-
tion 4 we consider the observed features of TW Hya in the
context of our model. In Section 5 we discuss these results
in the context of the limitations of our simulations and con-
clude in Section 6.
2 NUMERICAL METHOD
2.1 Three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations
In NDAMN18 we conducted simulations using the smoothed
particle hydrodynamics (SPH) code phantom, a code par-
ticularly well suited to examining warps and disc-planet in-
teractions (Price et al. 2018a). The simulations from Section
4 of that work examined the behaviour of an accretion disc
with a planet on a misaligned orbit. In the suite of simu-
lations presented the properties of the disc were held con-
stant; the disc extended from 0.1 to 50 au with a disc mass of
5× 10−3 M(cid:12) and was simulated with 3.4× 106 particles. The
surface density profile in each case was initially set with a
tapered inner edge and a power-law profile with an index of
a vertically isothermal disc assumed with the sound speed
p = −1. The aspect ratio was set to H/R = 0.05(R/R0)1/4 and
profile cs = cs,0(R/R0)−1/4, where R is the cylindrical radius
and R0=1 au for the simulations we are considering. As the
disc evolves, the temperature of the particles remains a func-
tion of radius and is assigned according to cs(R). The vis-
cosity was modelled with the Shakura & Sunyaev (1973) α
parametrisation, with α = 10−3 for all the particles. We refer
the interested reader to NDAMN18 for further details.
A planet was placed in each disc at a distance of 5 au
from the star with a mass of 0.13, 1.3 or 6.5MJ (correspond-
ing to 0.1, 1.0 and 5.0× the thermal mass) and an orbital
inclination of 2.15◦, 4.30◦ or 12.89◦ (0.5, 1.0 and 3.0× H/R,
where H is the scale height). This planet was then allowed
to migrate and accrete mass due to the interaction with
the surrounding disc for 200 orbits at the initial planet or-
bital radius. For those planets that were able to open a gap,
we found (in agreement with previous studies, see Xiang-
Gruess & Papaloizou 2013) that the initial disc was sepa-
rated into two discs. The inclination of the planets' orbit
caused a change in the relative orientation of the inner and
outer disc, with more massive and strongly inclined planets
driving a larger difference.
MNRAS 000, 1 -- 13 (2015)
Shadows in protoplanetary discs
3
Figure 1. Density cross-section in the x = 0 plane of our simulation from NDAMN18 with a 6.5MJ planet inclined at 12.89◦, located at
5 au after t = 100 orbits (the planet is not apparent in this figure as it is not located at x = 0 at this time). The planet has separated the
original disc into an inner and outer disc, both of which respond to the inclination of the planet. The inner disc tilts and precesses and
the disc exterior to the planet orbit warps. The dashed line shows the position of the initial disc mid-plane.
Figure 1 shows the density cross-section t = 100 planet
orbits of our representative simulation (with a 6.5MJ planet
inclined at 12.89◦). Here the dashed line represents the initial
position of the disc mid-plane. Although the outer disc (with
R > 5 au) has not moved appreciably, the inner has tilted
towards the inclined planet orbit. This rotation is accompa-
nied by the inner disc twisting as it undergoes differential
precession. The outer disc also warps slightly in response to
the misaligned planet (see Figures 8 and 9 of NDAMN18)
and traces of the spiral shocks from the planet can be seen,
e.g. around y ∼ −8 au, y ∼ 10 au in the cross section in
Figure 1.
In our simulations, the most massive planet (6.5MJ) was
surrounded by a weak tidal stream that was most clearly
visible during the initial phases where the gap is not fully
carved. As this could potentially complicate any shadows
due to the inclination of the inner disc, in this work we only
consider snapshots where the planet is on the far side of the
disc. We also supplement our parameter study with three
new simulations. These have exactly the same properties
as the previous set except that we consider a planet mass
of 2.6MJ (corresponding to 2.0× the thermal mass). In line
with our previous results the massive planet opens a gap
and a warp between the inner and outer disc and driving
precession of the inner disc.
For simplicity, in this work we use the t ∼ 100 orbit
snapshots of the simulations presented in NDAMN18. At
this time the gap opened by the planet is well established,
as the relative tilt between the inner and outer disc is almost
at maximum (e.g. see Figure 8, NDAMN18). The resolution
of the simulations decreases at late times as the particles in
the inner disc are accreted onto both the star and planet, but
at t ∼ 100 orbits it has not decreased appreciably -- the shell
averaged smoothing length to scale-height ratio (cid:104)h(cid:105)/H ≈ 0.65
at R = 3 au and < 0.2 for R > 10 au. This choice means
we do not take into account any temporal evolution of the
discs, noting that the warp amplitude decreases slightly after
t = 100 orbits in all of our simulations.
2.2 Radiative transfer calculations
We use the continuum radiative transfer code mcfost to
generate scattered light images from our simulations (Pinte
MNRAS 000, 1 -- 13 (2015)
et al. 2006, 2009). mcfost is particularly well suited for use
with SPH simulations because it employs a Voronoi mesh
rather than a cylindrical or spherical grid (Camps et al.
2015). This method allows the mesh to be made without
interpolation, as it is generated directly from the particle
positions. To accommodate regions of the simulation that
have lower numerical resolution, mcfost implements a check
based on the comparison between the size of the cell and the
smoothing length of the particle. In the case that a dimen-
sion of any cell is three times larger than the smoothing
length, mcfost considers the region outside three smooth-
ing lengths of the particle within that cell to be optically
void.
We focus on scattered light observations that are sen-
sitive to the distribution of micron sized dust grains. As
these grains are very well coupled to the gas, we can use the
gas distribution in our simulations directly. From our simu-
lations we estimate a Stokes number of ∼ 1.2 × 10−3 in the
upper layers for ∼ µm grains at 5 au, confirming this assump-
tion is valid. The total mass of dust in the disc is calculated
from the mass of gas in the disc (directly measured from the
simulation) and an assumed dust-to-gas ratio. We assume
that each of the dust grains are spherical and homogeneous
(according to Mie theory), that the dust and gas is in ther-
mal equilibrium and the dust opacities are independent of
temperature. We assume a dust-gas ratio of 100, where the
dust grains have a power-law size distribution with an expo-
nent of -3.5 (Mathis et al. 1977) between 0.03 and 1000µm
using 100 grain sizes.
To improve efficiency the computation of scattered light
is broken into two steps. First, the temperature of the disc is
calculated for each of the Voronoi cells. Photon packets are
emitted from the central star using a Monte Carlo approach
and the path of each photon packet is governed by scatter-
ing, absorption and re-emission processes (see Pinte et al.
2006). Second, the scattered light is calculated by emitting
photon packets randomly from the disc and central star. In
this second step the photon packets are always scattered (i.e.
there is no absorption) but the energy of the packet is multi-
plied by the albedo at each scattering event. Images are then
produced with a ray-tracing method, where we integrate the
radiative transfer equation using the specific intensities and
temperatures computed by the Monte-Carlo runs. We refer
y [au]z [au]-10010-505-15-14-13-12log density [g/cm3]t = 100 orbits 4
R. Nealon et al.
to Pinte et al. (2006) and Pinte et al. (2009) for a more
detailed description of mcfost.
Unless otherwise stated, we use the following values for
our mcfost calculations. To compute the temperature struc-
ture and the scattered light we use 108 photon packets and
our grid is set by the Voronoi mesh. We set our image to have
a size of 120 au and define the angular momentum vector of
the outer disc as direction of the viewer (that is, the viewer
is 'face-on' to the outer disc). We do not include any con-
tribution from viscous heating. The luminosity of the star is
calculated from 1 Myr Siess isochrone (Siess et al. 2000), as-
suming a fiducial 1M(cid:12) star. This corresponds to an effective
temperature of T∗ = 4278K and a luminosity of L∗ = 0.16L(cid:12).
The scattered light images have been computed at a wave-
length of λ = 1.6µm and convolved with a 2D Gaussian to
smooth across 1.8 au (which corresponds to a FWHM of
30mas at a distance of 60 pc, Gaia Collaboration et al. 2018).
We chose these values as they represent the angular resolu-
tion of TW Hya using a typical instrument, e.g. SPHERE or
GPI. The central 5 au of the disc is masked in figures (grey
inner circle) to simulate the effect of a coronograph.
2.3 Measuring the surface brightness as a
function of angle
Using the NICMOS and STIS instruments on the Hubble
Space Telescope (HST), Roberge et al. (2005), Debes et al.
(2017) and Poteet et al. (2018) identified subtle fluctuations
in the IR surface brightness of TW Hya by considering the
flux as a function of position. In order to measure this, they
separated the disc into concentric annuli (describing the dis-
tance from the star) as well as azimuthal wedges (describing
the angle around the disc). This allows the flux in each ra-
dial annulus to be described as a function of the azimuthal
angle. We follow the method outlined by Debes et al. (2017)
in order to describe the flux from our simulations in a com-
parable manner.
We discretise the outer disc into wedges where the an-
nuli are delimited by 5, 15, 30 and 50 au and the azimuthal
slices have an angular size of 5◦. In each single wedge, the
flux from all pixels is averaged and the standard deviation
quantifies the noise in the flux at that location in radius and
azimuthal angle. The flux across each radial annulus is av-
eraged and we use it to normalise the flux in each wedge in
that radial annulus. This means that the amplitude of the
surface brightness profiles plotted as a function of azimuthal
angle represent the variation from the average brightness in
that radial annulus. Following the method of Debes et al.
(2017), we assume this azimuthal profile can be fitted with
a sinusoidal function of the form
F(φ) = A cos[φ − C] + 1,
where A and C are unconstrained and φ is the angle mea-
sured from the positive x-axis in an anti-clockwise direction.
This form is scaled to the average brightness around the an-
nulus, where A determines the magnitude of the variation
compared to the average and the position angle C is the
angular location of the strongest variation.
(1)
The fit is achieved using a least-squares curve fitting
tool scipy.optimize (Jones et al. 2001). When conducting
the fit, each measurement of the flux at a specific azimuthal
wedge is weighted by the standard deviation of the flux in
Figure 2. Total intensity in scattered light at 1.6µm from a
misaligned inner disc, calculated from the simulation shown in
Figure 1. The upper right side appears brighter, consistent with
shadowing from the inner disc at R < 5 au. Here the inner 5 au
has been masked with a grey circle.
that wedge. Each parameter (A and C) is returned with an
associated standard deviation. We use the standard devia-
tion of the parameter A as an estimate for our accuracy of
the fit on the amplitude of the surface brightness profile.
3 SYNTHETIC SCATTERED LIGHT
OBSERVATIONS
We computed the scattered light images for our 12 simu-
lations described above using mcfost. Figure 2 shows an
example of the resulting total intensity image for the sim-
ulation with a 6.5MJ planet initially inclined at 12.89◦. It
is apparent that the upper, right side of this image is more
strongly illuminated than the lower, left side. This brightness
feature is consistent with the orientation of the misaligned
inner disc casting a shadow towards the left, lower side of the
disc in Figure 2. We examine the properties of this shadow
in the following sections.
3.1 Azimuthal brightness profile
The left panels of Figure 3 show the density rendering of our
simulation (upper), the corresponding scattered light image
(middle, as in Figure 2) and the azimuthal brightness profile
(lower). The surface brightness has been measured across 5-
15 au, 15-30 au and 30-50 au as indicated on the scattered
light image. The surface brightness profile shows asymme-
tries are present at all radii outside of the planet orbit, with
the deepest shadow occurring near the inner disc. The pro-
file of the shadow is quite noisy for φ < 180◦, likely due to
low resolution in the particle distribution close to the star
being strongly illuminated.
In order to test the effect of the inner disc, we remove
all the gas inside of 15 au as a post-processing step and
re-run the radiative transfer calculation. The density ren-
dering, scattered light image and surface brightness profile
MNRAS 000, 1 -- 13 (2015)
-40-2002040x [au]-40-2002040y [au]10−1510−1410−1310−12W/m2/arcsec2 Shadows in protoplanetary discs
5
Figure 3. Casting shadows in warped discs: the upper panels show the column density of a simulation from NDAMN18 containing a
6.5MJ planet inclined at 12.89◦ at 5 au at t = 100 orbits. The middle panels show the scattered light image recovered from this simulation,
with concentric annuli indicated with dashed lines. The lower panels show the azimuthal surface density profiles from each of these annuli,
normalised by the average brightness in the annulus. The left panels show the shadow cast from the misaligned inner disc. In the right
panels, gas from R < 15 au has been removed (as a post-processing step), demostrating variation in the surface density brightness due
to the warp induced in the disc by the misaligned planet.
MNRAS 000, 1 -- 13 (2015)
x [au]y [au]-50050-50050-101log column density [ g/cm2]x [au]y [au]-50050-50050-101log column density [ g/cm2]-60-3003060x[au]-60-3003060y[au]10−1610−1510−1410−1310−12-60-3003060x[au]-60-3003060y[au]10−1610−1510−1410−1310−12W/m2/arcsec2090180270Azimuthalangle0.00.51.01.52.02.5Normalisedbrightness5-15au15-30au30-50au090180270360Azimuthalangle15-30au30-50au 6
R. Nealon et al.
Figure 4. Measuring the amplitude of the surface brightness variation, with the thick solid lines representing the fit to the data from
Equation 1. The left panel shows the variation due to a misaligned inner disc (and warp) and the right panel the variation due to warping
in the outer disc, both for the simulation shown in Figure 3.
are shown in the right panels of Figure 3. We note that the
same profile shown in Figure 3 is achieved by only removing
the gas inside of 5 au, but with 15 au we can be confident
there are no effects due to warping at the inner edge of the
outer disc. By eliminating all gas in the inner region, we re-
move any structures that could cast a shadow such that the
outer disc is uniformly illuminated by the star. The surface
brightness still shows significant but much smaller variations
in the azimuthal profile (lower, right panel). This variation
is due to the influence of the misaligned planet on the struc-
ture of the disc; the planet induces a warp in the outer disc
and this causes one side of the disc to be illuminated more
strongly. Because the illumination of the disc depends on
the differential twist between the source of the illumination
(e.g. the star) and the radius of the disc that is being illumi-
nated, this affect appears stronger at larger radii. The lower,
right panel of Figure 3 demonstrates this, with the variation
between 30-50 au stronger than in the intermediate disc.
Due to warp propagation, we note that at later times in our
simulation the warp amplitude is lower in the outer disc.
To confirm this variation in brightness in the outer disc
is exclusively caused by differential twist in the disc driven
by the planet, we first repeat the radiative transfer but force
the scattering to be isotropic. Here we recover the same vari-
ation in the surface brightness, confirming that this effect is
due to the preferential illumination of the disc. Second, we
repeat this calculation at t = 40 orbits when the inner disc
is inclined but the outer disc has not yet been able to twist
up (see Figures 8 and 9, NDAMN18). At this earlier time
when the outer disc is not yet warped, we find no variation
in the azimuthal brightness profile.
Our simulations with a misaligned planet therefore
demonstrate that a non-axisymmetric azimuthal brightness
profile can be driven by two mechanisms. First, the inner
misaligned disc can cast strong shadows that emanate from
the inner region. Second, the outer disc warp causes some
part of the disc to be preferentially illuminated with the
strongest variation occurring at large radii. Understanding
the shadow in TW Hya requires us to consider both of these
effects together.
3.2 Amplitude of the brightness variation
We quantify the variation in the surface brightness profile
observed in Figure 3 using the curve fitting procedure out-
lined in Section 2.3. Figure 3 suggests that a variation could
be caused by either shadowing from the inner disc or warping
of the outer disc, so we present fits for both of these. Fig-
ure 4 shows the azimuthal brightness for both cases with the
variation due to the misaligned inner disc in the left panel
and the variation measured in the outer disc in the right
panel. Both are shown with the standard deviation in the
flux measurement as a shaded region. We measure the vari-
ation from the misaligned inner disc between 5-15 au, where
there is little confusion from the outer disc warp and the
shadow is strongest. We also measure the variation due to
the outer disc warp between 30-50 au, where it is strongest
(and after eliminating the inner disc, as described above).
Both measurements thus represent an upper limit on the
amplitude of the shadow for t = 100 orbits and should be
considered as demonstrations of the effect of the warp.
For a 6.5MJ planet inclined at 12.89◦, the intensity of
the shadow cast by the misaligned disc between 5-15 au is
best fit with an amplitude of 78%±3% (compared to the
mean in this annulus). For the same simulation, in the outer
disc between 30-50 au we measure a variation in the surface
brightness caused by the outer disc warp of 25%±9%. It is
clear that the fit to the shadow in the left panel of Figure 4
is not a good representation of the actual profile cast by the
shadow. This is particularly apparent for azimuthal angles
(cid:46) 120◦, where the profile is dominated by noise likely due to
the strong illumination of low resolution particles. However
we chose a simple sinusoid function because of its simplicity
MNRAS 000, 1 -- 13 (2015)
090180270360Azimuthalangle0.00.51.01.52.02.5Normalisedbrightness5-15au090180270360Azimuthalangle30-50au and also to allow direct comparison to the observations in
Debes et al. (2017) and Poteet et al. (2018), as they used
this form.
We repeat this measurement of the variation in the sur-
face brightness due to either the misaligned inner disc or
warp in the outer region for each of our 12 simulations. Fig-
ure 5 shows the amplitudes from each of these fits with their
associated uncertainties, plotted as a function of the relative
inclination between the inner and outer disc (i.e. the maxi-
mum projected inclination, calculated as the angle between
their average angular momentum vectors). The depth of the
shadow driven by the inner disc (left panel, Figure 5) is
largest for more massive planets. This agrees with our pre-
vious findings where the massive planets are able to open a
gap more cleanly, allowing a larger difference in the orien-
tation between the inner and outer disc (NDAMN18). For
those planets not able to cleanly separate the inner and outer
disc (in our simulations, planets with 0.13MJ), we find that
the amplitude of the shadow depths measured are consistent
with zero.
Figure 5 thus suggests that an appreciable shadow (i.e.
more than ∼10%) is only cast by planets much more mas-
sive than the gap-opening mass. For an aligned planet, the
gap-opening mass is approximately the same as the thermal
mass of 1.3MJ (Crida et al. 2006; Baruteau et al. 2014). With
the parameters used in our simulations, the limit for gener-
ating a brightness variation corresponds to (cid:38) 6MJ planets
(at inclinations (cid:38) 2◦) that drive misalignments of only a few
degrees between the inner and outer disc. We find a similar
limit exists on the amplitude of the variation driven by the
warp in the outer disc (right panel, Figure 5); planets that
are more massive than the gap clearing mass are able to
drive appreciable variations in the brightness profile in the
outer disc. Additionally, in NDAMN18 we showed that the
warp created across the planet orbit for a massive planet at
low/moderate inclinations was mainly caused by differential
precession of the inner disc. These shadows therefore rep-
resent the misalignment due to the precession of the inner
disc, rather than the inner disc being strictly tilted away
from the outer disc.
3.3 Effect of viewing inclination
In the above results we have assumed the viewing inclination
is parallel to the angular momentum vector in the outer disc
(i.e. the outer disc is face on). However, as the variation in
surface brightness is a geometric effect it is likely to change
when viewed at other inclinations. A cursory examination
of the disc at different inclinations shows that this is indeed
the case with shadows only clear for viewing inclinations less
than about 30◦. At inclinations larger than this, brightness
profiles are complicated by the dust scattering function and
flaring structure.
We thus consider the extreme case of viewing the disc
edge-on (i.e. the viewing inclination is i = 90◦ and the angu-
lar momentum vector of the outer disc is perpendicular to
the line of sight). As our simulation does not go for a full pre-
cession of the inner disc, we emulate precession by rotating
the disc through 90◦, 180◦ and 270◦, measured clock-wise
from the orientation in Figure 3. When the disc is subse-
quently turned edge on, the inner disc is then at four differ-
ent orientations, as it would be across a full precession.
MNRAS 000, 1 -- 13 (2015)
Shadows in protoplanetary discs
7
Figure 6 shows the inclined view of the entire disc. There
is a flux asymmetry between the upper and lower disc sur-
faces depending on the rotation of the disc, with the lower
disc surface brighter with an viewing rotation of 0◦ and the
upper disc surface at a rotation of 180◦. To confirm whether
this asymmetry is caused by the misaligned inner disc or
the warp in the outer disc, we repeat this calculation but
remove the gas inside of 15 au. As before, this removes any
shadowing that could be caused by the inner misaligned disc
such that any changes in flux should only be caused by the
warp in the outer disc. We find that the disc is brighter in
absolute flux (as the remaining disc is now more strongly
illuminated) but that the same flux asymmetry pattern ap-
pears. This comparison suggests that a flux asymmetry be-
tween the upper and lower surfaces of an edge-on disc is a
potential signature of a disc warp. If the warp is steady, in
observations these asymmetries would evolve according to
the precession time-scale of the warp in the outer disc. We
note that similar asymmetries have already been observed
on much shorter time-scales, e.g. HH 30 (Stapelfeldt et al.
1999).
3.4 Temperature structure
While our simulations in NDAMN18 assume the disc is verti-
cally isothermal, mcfost calculates the temperature struc-
ture due to the illumination by the star. To quantify the
effect of our assumption, Figure 7 compares the tempera-
ture calculated by mcfost for each Voronoi cell in the disc
mid-plane with the temperature predicted in our simula-
tion. Here we have discretised the Voronoi mesh into annuli
(defined by cylindrical radius) and by comparing with the
azimuthally averaged profile of the angular momentum, ex-
tracted and averaged the temperature of only those cells
that are within a distance of z < 0.05 from the mid-plane.
Thus the profile in Figure 7 represents the temperature of
the (sometimes misaligned) disc mid-plane. Outside of the
planet orbit (at R (cid:38) 10 au) the radial temperature gradi-
ent is consistent with that assumed in the hydrodynamical
simulations (i.e. T(R) ∝ R−1/2). Around the planet orbit (at
5 au) the spiral density waves created by the planet are
identified in the temperature structure. The disc inside the
planet orbit and around the planet is warped and not uni-
formly illuminated by the star, hence we do not expect good
agreement in this inner region.
The offset in Figure 7 demonstrates that the tempera-
ture assumed in the simulation is hotter than that calculated
using mcfost, by a factor of ∼ 4. This offset corresponds to a
difference in the sound speed in the disc of ∼ 2 such that com-
munication (via wave propagation) is occurring about twice
as fast than it would if radiative transfer were included. A
change in the sound speed (or equivalently, the thickness of
the disc) may prevent the planet carving a gap or change
the precession behaviour. However, for the parameters we
have simulated in NDAMN18 we estimate that such a small
change does not affect the relationship between the sound
crossing and precession time-scales. As this relationship de-
termines the evolution of the disc (in the event the planet
is massive enough to open a gap, whether the inner disc
will precess with respect to the outer disc), we thus expect
that a cooler disc will exhibit similar dynamical evolution.
Additionally, the disc temperature calculated by mcfost is
8
R. Nealon et al.
Figure 5. What planet mass and inclination leads to the largest shadow? The percentage is derived from the curve fitting procedure
(i.e. the amplitude of the fitted curve in Figure 4) over our 12 simulations at t ∼ 100 orbits. The left panel shows the shadow cast by the
inclined inner disc and the right panel the variation due to the warp in the outer disc. The different planet masses and inclinations are
shown by the legend in the right hand panel.
Figure 6. Scattered light surfaces when the disc in Figure 2 is viewed edge-on from different sides (with the rotation indicated measured
clock-wise from Figure 3). The asymmetry in the flux between the upper and lower disc surfaces is mainly due to the warp in the outer
disc.
primarily determined by the luminosity of the star, which in
turn depends on the input parameters of its age and mass.
A higher luminosity star would reduce the discrepancy (our
adopted value is L∗ = 0.16 L(cid:12)).
Figure 8 shows the azimuthal temperature profile be-
tween 9.9 < R < 10.1 au, with the cells coloured by their az-
imuthal angle (such a narrow radial annulus is only chosen
for plotting convenience, we find the same results with larger
annuli). Significant departures from the locally isothermal
approximation occur at only more than two scale-heights
from the mid-plane.
Additionally, the striking pattern on either side of the
mid-plane demonstrates the effect that shadowing has on the
temperature structure in the disc. The upper and lower sur-
face of the disc have opposing temperatures at the same az-
imuthal position, such that one side of the disc is warm while
the other is cool. This temperature differential is driven by
the shadowing due to the misaligned inner disc and will af-
fect the dust thermal emission and disc scale-height of the
disc if taken into account during our simulation.
4 CASTING SHADOWS: AN APPLICATION
TO TW HYA
Recent observations of TW Hya have identified an azimuthal
surface brightness variation that is proposed to be created
by an inclined inner disc driven by a misaligned planet.
From observations, this shadow has two defining features;
the speed at which it rotates (22.7◦/yr) and the radial loca-
tion (outside of ∼50 au) (Roberge et al. 2005; Debes et al.
2017; Poteet et al. 2018). In Section 3 we have shown that
an inner, misaligned disc generated by an inclined planet is
capable of casting shadows with similar properties. We thus
seek to test our model by applying it to the shadow observed
in TW Hya. Indeed, if this model is consistent with the ob-
MNRAS 000, 1 -- 13 (2015)
012345Projecteddiscmisalignment(degrees)020406080100Amplitudeofbrightnessvariationcastbymisalignedinnerdisc(%)012345Projecteddiscmisalignment(degrees)020406080100Amplitudeofbrightnessvariationduetoouterdiscwarp(%)m=0.13MJm=1.3MJm=2.6MJm=6.5MJi=2.15◦i=4.30◦i=12.89◦-50050x[au]-50050y[au]Rotatedby0◦-50050x[au]Rotatedby90◦-50050x[au]Rotatedby180◦-50050x[au]Rotatedby270◦10−1610−1510−1410−13W/m2/arcsec2 Shadows in protoplanetary discs
9
absence of the shadow at intermediate radii may be caused
by a few different mechanisms. First, they suggest the rela-
tive geometry between the inner and outer disc may result
in a shadow only being cast in the outer disc. With the ar-
rangement proposed by Debes et al. (2017), the shadow is
likely to appear as in the left panels of Figure 3 where we
find the shadow is weaker in the outer disc. Second, they
propose that the inner rim of the outer disc is puffed in such
a way as to cast a shadow that masks any azimuthal vari-
ation (as in Dullemond et al. 2001; Dong 2015). However,
the azimuthal temperature profile in Figure 8 demonstrates
that if there is a misaligned inner disc it will drive an asym-
metry in the temperature structure at the inner edge of the
outer disc. This suggests that the puffing would also be non-
axisymmetric. Third, Debes et al. (2017) suggest that one
of the currently observed gaps in the inner region is capa-
ble of interfering with the shadow. While shadows from the
puffed edges of a planet gap have been considered (Jang-
Condell 2008, 2009), our simulations do not include a planet
at larger radii and so cannot address this.
Our scattered light image in the right panels of Fig-
ure 3 suggests an additional option: warping of the outer
disc by a misaligned planet produces comparable fluctua-
tions in the azimuthal surface brightness profile. Crucially,
the strength of this effect depends on the radius due to the
radial dependence of the warp. Figure 5 also demonstrates
that a planet massive enough to separate an inner disc (in
our simulations, (cid:38)2MJ) is also massive enough to warp the
outer disc. Thus any planet that can drive an inner, precess-
ing disc must cause warping of the outer disc which would
affect the profile of the shadow as a function of the radius.
In this scenario, a misaligned planet could self consistently
explain two of the key features of the shadow in TW Hya.
4.2 Depth of the shadow
The depth of the shadow (measured as the amplitude of the
variation in the surface brightness profile, A in Equation 1)
is likely to have contributions from both the shadow cast
by the misaligned inner disc and the warp in the outer disc.
How these effects sum depends on their relative phase; as
the warp in the outer disc precesses much more slowly than
the precessing inner disc. Thus there must exist particular
arrangements where they add constructively and the shadow
appears deeper than it otherwise would (and vice versa). For
the parameters chosen in our simulations (in particular, the
location of the planet orbit and the aspect ratio), Figure 5
indicates that either mechanism in isolation could produce
variations that are consistent in amplitude to TW Hya for
planet masses ∼ 6MJ (∼ 20%, Debes et al. 2017).
4.3 Speed of the shadow
The rate of precession of the inner disc depends strongly
on the mass of the planet and its orbital inclination to the
precessing disc. In the case that the inner disc is precessing
differentially relative to the outer disc, we have additional
constraints on the relationship between the planet mass, ra-
dial extend of the inner disc and the radial extent of the
outer disc.
The frequency of precession of a rigidly precessing cir-
Figure 7. Comparison of the mid-plane temperature structure
used to generate the scattered light images (solid line) with
the vertically isothermal approximation assumed in NDAMN18
(dashed line). Although the temperature profile calculated by mc-
fost has the same radial power-law slope, it is cooler than that
assumed in our simulations. The feature at 5 au corresponds to
the planet orbit, with spiral waves emanating from this region.
Figure 8. Effect of shadowing on the temperature profile in the
outer disc. The temperature of each of the cells between 9.9 < R <
10.1 au used in our scattered light calculation is shown, coloured
with the azimuthal angle. When the azimuthal angle is < 180◦
(> 180◦) the upper side of the disc is warm (cool) and the lower
side is cool (warm). This is consistent with the shadow cast by
the misaligned inner disc.
servations it will place constraints on the location and mass
of the misaligned planet. Based on the features of the shadow
observed in TW Hya, we consider the location, speed, depth
of the shadow and secular evolution of the disc in turn.
4.1 Location of the shadow
The shadow identified in TW Hya appears only in the outer
disc, where R (cid:38) 53 au. Debes et al. (2017) suggest that the
MNRAS 000, 1 -- 13 (2015)
100101Radius(au)101102103Temperature(K)−4−2024z/H20406080100120Temperature(K)50100150200250300350Azimuthalangle 10
R. Nealon et al.
Þ xout
Þ xout
xin
xin
ΣR3dR
ΣΩk R3dR
ωprec = −3Gm
4a3
cumprimary disc in an inclined binary is given by Larwood
et al. (1996),
cos β
(cid:48)
.
(2)
Here xin and xout are the inner and outer edges of the
disc respectively, m is the planet mass, a is the semi-major
axis of the orbit, G is the gravitational constant and β(cid:48) is
the angle between the disc and the inclined planet. This
expression can be used to calculate the precession time-scale,
as tprec = 2π/ωprec. If we assume Σ ∝ R−1 and a very small
inner edge, this reduces to the form used by Debes et al.
(2017)1 (originally from Lai 2014),
(cid:19)−1/2(cid:16) rdisc
(cid:17)−3/2(cid:16)
(cid:17)3
ac
1 au
300 au
yr,
(3)
P =
7.21 × 107
µc cos ic
(cid:18) M∗
M(cid:12)
where µc is the mass ratio of the secondary to the primary,
ic ≡ β(cid:48) in Equation 2, rdisc ≡ xout and ac is the semi-major
axis of the secondary. Following Debes et al. (2017), we can
solve either of these equations for the position and mass of
the planet that will drive precession at the rate observed in
TW Hya.
The solution to both Equations 2 and 3 for tprec = P =
15.9 years is shown in Figure 9. In this representation, a
planet must lie in the vicinity of the solid and dashed lines
in order to cause precession of a disc that agrees with the
rate observed in TW Hya. Here we have assumed the disc
is truncated at 0.05 au (although it may be smaller than
this, Johnstone et al. 2014), the disc extends to 90% of the
planet's orbit (as in Debes et al. 2017), the star has a mass
of 0.7M(cid:12) (Hu´elamo et al. 2008) and the inclination between
the disc and the planet is small. Additionally, we assume a Σ
profile in Equation 2 that has a taper at the inner edge such
that Σ(Rin) = 0. Both of these relations agree that in order
to drive the observed precession rate, such a planet must be
massive ((cid:29) the gap clearing mass) and relatively close in.
For example, a planet of 12.5MJ located at ∼ 0.2 au would
drive a disc between 0.05 and 0.2 au to precess with a period
of 15.9 years. These planet masses are broadly consistent
with previous predictions by Facchini et al. (2014).
Radial velocity (RV) observations of pre-main-sequence
stars are challenging, due to the high levels of stellar activ-
ity, but if we treat the observations of Setiawan et al. (2008)
and Hu´elamo et al. (2008) as upper limits on the mass of
any companion in TW Hya then they yield a combined up-
per limit to the RV amplitude of 238±9 m s−1; any putative
planet in the system must induce a stellar reflex velocity be-
low this limit. Assuming a viewing inclination of 7◦, we solve
for the planet orbit and mass that will cause a radial velocity
measurement of 238±9 m s−1. The relationship between the
planet mass and radius is shown in Figure 9 by the dotted
line and represents an upper limit for the mass of the planet
-- a planet that is more massive than this should have been
revealed in existing observations. This comparison suggests
that it is possible for a planet that is massive enough to
cause a precessing, inner disc to remain undetected by cur-
rent radial velocity measurements.
4.4 Long term evolution
Our simulations in NDAMN18 are limited in that they do
not complete a full precession of the inner disc. We instead
consider the viscous and alignment time-scales to infer the
long term evolution.
The mode of differential precession invoked to cast the
moving shadow requires that the planet and inner disc have
some mutual misalignment (Equation 2). This was evident
in NDAMN18, where we see differential precession cease af-
ter t ∼ 50 orbits, when the planet and inner disc show the
same tilt (Figures 8 and 9 of that paper). When the inner
disc and planet are aligned, a shadow will still be cast (the
inner disc will still be misaligned with respect to the outer
disc) but it will move with the much slower precession rate
of the entire disc. The rate at which this alignment occurs
between the planet and the inner disc is on the order of the
precession time-scale (Scheuer & Feiler 1996) -- this is ∼15.9
years in the case of TW Hya. However, this azimuthal fea-
ture has been identified in observations spanning about 17
years (Roberge et al. 2005; Debes et al. 2017; Poteet et al.
2018). Given the length of time this shadow should be visi-
ble compared to the disc lifetime, it is thus unlikely that the
inner disc is driven by a single misaligned planet.
Independent of the mechanism that causes the disc to
precess, its lifetime may be limited by how quickly it is ac-
creted onto the star. The accretion rate in TW Hya is esti-
mated to be ∼ 1.8 × 10−9 M(cid:12)/yr (Ingleby et al. 2013). We
relate the mass of the disc inside the planet orbit to this ac-
cretion rate to find the expected disc life-time, optimistically
estimating that the disc could extend to 0.3 au (from Fig-
ure 9). Assuming a surface density profile of (Pringle 1981)
Σ(R) = Σ0
(cid:114) Rin
(cid:19)−p(cid:32)
(cid:18) R
1 −
(cid:33)
(4)
,
R0
R
where Σ0 is calibrated to the total disc mass, R0 = 1 au
and p = 1, the disc mass from the inner edge of the disc
Rin = 0.05 au to the planet orbit at Rp = 0.3 au is
Mdisc =
2πRΣ(R)dR.
(5)
Þ Rp
Rin
Assuming a total disc mass (i.e. between 0.1 au and 50 au)
of 5× 10−3 M(cid:12) as in our simulations, this suggests the inner
disc life-time of ∼ 6.3 × 103 years or less than ∼ 0.1% of
the total disc life-time of ∼ 107 years (e.g. Weinberger et al.
2013). This measurement is similar to the estimation using
the viscous life-time, expressed as
,
R
tν =
(6)
where H/R is the aspect ratio, α the Shakura-Sunyaev vis-
cosity parameter and Ωk the Keplerian angular velocity.
Here we set H/R = 0.05(R/R0)1/2−q, with q = 1/4, R0 = 1 au
and α = 10−3. At R = 0.3 au the viscous time-scale is then
∼ 2.3× 104 years. It is thus highly unlikely that this disc can
be sustained long enough to be observed unless it is being
fed by the outer disc, but such replenishment is not expected
across the gap that must exist in order for the precession of
the inner disc to occur.
(cid:18) H
(cid:19)−2
1
αΩk
1 In deriving Equation 3 from Lai (2014), we find a different lead-
ing coefficient to that in Equation 2 of Debes et al. (2017) by a
factor of 503/2.
We note that the above estimate is directly proportional
to the total mass of the disc but this is difficult to measure
(Thi et al. 2010; Bergin et al. 2013; Trapman et al. 2017;
MNRAS 000, 1 -- 13 (2015)
Shadows in protoplanetary discs
11
affect the precession rate of the inner disc. While our simula-
tions only consider a disc mass of 5× 10−3 M(cid:12), the observed
disc mass is poorly constrained (Thi et al. 2010; Bergin et al.
2013; Trapman et al. 2017; Teague et al. 2018) and may be
massive enough to influence the inner disc precession.
One limitation of our simulations in NDAMN18 is that
they do not take into account any magnetic field effects. At
the predicted location of the misaligned planet (Figure 9)
the stellar magnetic field is likely to interact with the disc.
An example of how this may affect the inner edge of the
disc is found in AA Tau, which has a stellar magnetic field
that is misaligned by about 20◦ (Bouvier et al. 1999; Donati
et al. 2010). Non-ideal MHD simulations by Romanova et al.
(2004) demonstrated that the inner edge of a disc warps
under the influence of the misaligned magnetic field. This
type of warping represents an additional method to cast a
shadow from the inner disc to the outer disc, but here the
time-scale for the shadow to move would be related to the
stellar magnetic field structure. In applying such a model to
TW Hya, we note that measurements of the magnetic field
geometry suggest it is misaligned by (cid:46) 10◦ (Donati et al.
2011) and the inner radius of the disc is 0.05 au (Eisner et al.
2006; Johnstone et al. 2014). Thus if the shadow cast from
the misaligned inner disc was due to magnetic fields it would
likely have a similar time-scale to the stellar rotation period,
which is observed to be days in TW Hya. It is not clear how
time-scales of years required by the observed shadow in TW
Hya can be related to the much shorter time-scales due to
stellar magnetic field effects at the inner edge of the disc.
Our simulations are also limited by their radial extent
and duration. In NDAMN18 we demonstrated that the mis-
alignment of the inner disc and the warp structure in the
outer disc both evolve dramatically across the 200 planet
orbits simulated. Both the variation due to the misaligned
inner disc and the warped outer disc decrease across the last
100 orbits of our simulations. We thus caution that the am-
plitudes presented in Figures 3 and 5 are optimistic, but note
that the other features of the shadow (i.e. radial location)
do not change appreciably for t > 100 orbits. The radial pro-
file of the warp under the influence of multiple planets also
remains unexplored.
5.2 Alternative mechanisms to cast a shadow
The shadow in TW Hya may alternatively be the cast by
the dense tidal stream when the planet is on the near side
of the disc. We find hints of this in the earlier stages of our
simulations, when the planet is still rapidly accreting. In this
case the speed of the shadow may be explained by the Kep-
lerian orbit of a misaligned planet at 5.6 au. Additionally, it
implies that the shadow would only be observed for the half
of the orbit when the planet is on the near side of the disc.
This is consistent with current observations (e.g. Figure 7 of
Debes et al. 2017) and suggests that the shadow will not be
visible after ∼2022.
The radial dependence of the shadow observed in TW
Hya may be self-consistently explained if the disc is warped
by the presence of a misaligned planet. However, warping of
the outer disc could also be caused by a smaller, misaligned
planet at larger radii or by a previous interaction with an ex-
ternal perturber. Recent simulations by Cuello et al. (2018)
showed that the disc may be warped by such an episode and
Figure 9. Approximate relationship between mass and radius for
a misaligned planet located in TW Hya, based on the observed
rate of the shadow in the outer disc (i.e. Equations 2 and 3).
Thus, in order to cast a shadow moving with a precession rate of
15.9 years, the planet would have to be massive and close to the
innermost edge of the disc. The innermost edge of the disc fixed
at 0.05 au (Eisner et al. 2006; Johnstone et al. 2014). The upper
limit (dotted line) is calculated for a reflex velocity of K = 238m/s
and i = 7◦ (Setiawan et al. 2008; Hu´elamo et al. 2008).
Teague et al. 2018). For the largest realistic total disc mass
of 0.1 M(cid:12) the inner disc life-time increases to 1.2× 105 years
or ∼ 1.2% of the disc life-time. The life-time of this inner,
precessing disc is thus much shorter than the estimated disc
life-time, even taking into account the uncertainty in the
total disc mass.
5 DISCUSSION
Observations of a moving azimuthal brightness pattern in
TW Hya have been proposed to be caused by a misaligned,
precessing inner disc casting a shadow on the outer disc
(Debes et al. 2017; Poteet et al. 2018). Although our results
in Section 3 show that the observational signatures of a disc
misaligned by a planet may provide a consistent explana-
tion, our discussion in Section 4 shows that this is unlikely
to be the complete picture. We thus consider other mecha-
nisms that may result in shadowing from the inner disc and
the relevant limitations of our simulations from NDAMN18.
5.1 Alternative mechanisms to misalign the inner
disc
While precession of the inner disc due to a single misaligned
planet is unlikely, the interaction of multiple bodies may be
able to sustain precession. For example, the presence of an-
other massive planet may lead to planet-planet scattering
interactions that could continue to perturb the inner planet
(Thommes & Lissauer 2003). Indeed, there is circumstantial
evidence of planets outside of 1 au in TW Hya (Calvet et al.
2002; Debes et al. 2013; Andrews et al. 2016; Tsukagoshi
et al. 2016; van Boekel et al. 2017; Mentiplay et al. 2018).
Additionally, if the outer disc is particularly massive it may
MNRAS 000, 1 -- 13 (2015)
0.000.050.100.150.200.250.30Planetsemi-majoraxis(au)051015202530Planetmass(MJ)Lai2014Larwoodetal.1996UpperlimitfromRV,Hu´elamoetal.2008 12
R. Nealon et al.
retain the warp long after the interaction (see also Nixon &
Pringle 2010). For the relatively isolated TW Hya, such an
interaction appears unlikely. In any case, we note that the
time-scale of the shadow cannot be matched exclusively by
a warp in the outer disc.
6 CONCLUSIONS
We have examined the signatures in scattered light that are
caused in a protoplanetary disc under the influence of a
misaligned planet. Using our simulations from NDAMN18,
we have conducted radiative transfer calculations using mc-
fost. We have then examined the azimuthal profile of the
surface brightness from both a shadow cast from an inner,
misaligned disc and the variation due to a warp in the outer
disc. Our results are summarised as:
(i) An inner disc misaligned by more than a degree can
cast non-axisymmetric shadows on the outer disc which are
observable in IR scattered light (with a shadow depth of
(cid:38) 20% compared to the average flux at that radius). This
shadow is strongest closest to the inner edge of the outer disc
and decreases in intensity at larger radii. The azimuthal lo-
cation of this shadow is consistent with a shadow cast from
the inner disc. In the case that the disc is created by a mis-
aligned planet, our simulations suggest the planet must be
(cid:38) 6.5MJ and inclined by more than ∼ 2◦ to cast an appre-
ciable shadow. These values are specific to our model, but
correspond to a planet with 5.0× the thermal masses at an
inclination of 0.5×H/R. In contrast to previous works, a only
small relative misalignment between the inner and outer disc
is required to produce shadowing (and this inclination is less
than the initial inclination of the planet).
(ii) The presence of a warp can additionally cause mea-
surable variations in the azimuthal surface brightness. The
amplitude of this variation depends on the relative warp
between the star and the disc, and thus can change the ap-
pearance of this variation as a function of radius. In our sim-
ulations with a misaligned planet, the variation is strongest
at large radii. Our simulations suggest that planets that are
massive enough to cause a misaligned inner disc also drive
a warp in the outer disc.
(iii) Our simulations suggest that a misaligned inner disc
may be consistent with observations of the moving shadow in
TW Hya. Despite this, we argue that it is difficult to sustain
this configuration over observationally relevant time-scales,
making this an unlikely arrangement for TW Hya.
Although the scattered light images from a misaligned
inner disc are consistent with observations, we suggest that
a single misaligned planet is unlikely to be the mechanism
driving such a disc. Alternative scenarios include a mis-
aligned planet in the outer disc providing the outer disc
warp, the inner disc warped by a misaligned stellar mag-
netic field, Keplerian motion of a misaligned inner planet at
5 au or precession driven by more than a single planet.
Even the case that the misaligned disc is not driven by a
planet, this work demonstrates that small to moderate mis-
alignments in the disc are capable of casting shadows onto
the outer disc. In combination with previous studies looking
at strongly misaligned discs (Facchini et al. 2018; Zhu 2018),
this confirms that warps and misalignments can be used to
inform on the underlying dynamics in protoplanetary discs.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors warmly thank Daniel Price, Cassandra Hall,
Chris Nixon and Jim Pringle for useful discussions. We
also thank John Debes and the referee for constructive
comments. This project has received funding from the
European Research Council (ERC) under the European
Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
(grant agreement No 681601). DM is funded by a Re-
search Training Program Stipend from the Australian gov-
ernment. This work was performed using the DiRAC Data
Intensive service at Leicester, operated by the University
of Leicester IT Services, which forms part of the STFC
DiRAC HPC Facility (www.dirac.ac.uk). The equipment
was funded by BEIS capital funding via STFC capital grants
ST/K000373/1 and ST/R002363/1 and STFC DiRAC Op-
erations grant ST/R001014/1. DiRAC is part of the Na-
tional e-Infrastructure. Figure 1 and the upper panels of
Figure 3 were plotted with splash (Price 2007). All other
figures were produced using the community open-source
Python package Matplotlib (Hunter 2007).
REFERENCES
Alencar S. H. P., et al., 2018, preprint, (arXiv:1811.04806)
Andrews S. M., Williams J. P., 2007, ApJ, 659, 705
Andrews S. M., et al., 2016, ApJ, 820, L40
Ansdell M., et al., 2016, ApJ, 816, 69
Ansdell M., et al., 2018, preprint, (arXiv:1803.05923)
Arzamasskiy L., Zhu Z., Stone J. M., 2018, MNRAS, 475, 3201
Baruteau C., et al., 2014, Planet-Disk Interactions and Early Evo-
lution of Planetary Systems. University of Arizona Press, pp
667 -- 690, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt183gxt8.34
Bate M. R., 2018, MNRAS, 475, 5618
Benisty M., et al., 2017, A&A, 597, A42
Benisty M.,
et al., 2018, preprint, p. arXiv:1809.01082
(arXiv:1809.01082)
Bergin E. A., et al., 2013, Nature, 493, 644
Bitsch B., Crida A., Libert A.-S., Lega E., 2013, A&A, 555, A124
Bouvier J., et al., 1999, A&A, 349, 619
Calvet N., D'Alessio P., Hartmann L., Wilner D., Walsh A., Sitko
M., 2002, ApJ, 568, 1008
Camps P., et al., 2015, A&A, 580, A87
Casassus S., et al., 2018, MNRAS, 477, 5104
Cieza L. A., et al., 2019, MNRAS, 482, 698
Crida A., Morbidelli A., Masset F., 2006, Icarus, 181, 587
Cuello N.,
2018, preprint, p.
arXiv:1812.00961
et
al.,
(arXiv:1812.00961)
Dai F., Facchini S., Clarke C. J., Haworth T. J., 2015, MNRAS,
449, 1996
Debes J. H., Jang-Condell H., Weinberger A. J., Roberge A.,
Schneider G., 2013, ApJ, 771, 45
Debes J. H., et al., 2017, ApJ, 835, 205
Donati J.-F., et al., 2010, MNRAS, 409, 1347
Donati J. F., et al., 2011, MNRAS, 417, 472
Dong R., 2015, ApJ, 810, 6
Dong R., et al., 2018, ApJ, 860, 124
Dullemond C. P., Dominik C., Natta A., 2001, ApJ, 560, 957
Eisner J. A., Chiang E. I., Hillenbrand L. A., 2006, ApJ, 637,
L133
Facchini S., Lodato G., Price D. J., 2013, MNRAS, 433, 2142
MNRAS 000, 1 -- 13 (2015)
Shadows in protoplanetary discs
13
Weinberger A. J., Anglada-Escud´e G., Boss A. P., 2013, ApJ, 762,
118
Xiang-Gruess M., Papaloizou J. C. B., 2013, MNRAS, 431, 1320
Zhu Z., 2018, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1812.01262
van Boekel R., et al., 2017, ApJ, 837, 132
van Terwisga S. E., et al., 2018, preprint, (arXiv:1811.03071)
Facchini S., Ricci L., Lodato G., 2014, MNRAS, 442, 3700
Facchini S., Juh´asz A., Lodato G., 2018, MNRAS, 473, 4459
Gagn´e J., et al., 2017, ApJS, 228, 18
Gaia Collaboration et al., 2018, A&A, 616, A1
Hartmann L., 2009, Accretion Processes in Star Formation: Sec-
ond Edition. Cambridge University Press
Hu´elamo N., et al., 2008, A&A, 489, L9
Hughes A. M., Wilner D. J., Andrews S. M., Qi C., Hogerheijde
M. R., 2011, ApJ, 727, 85
Hunter J. D., 2007, Computing In Science & Engineering, 9, 90
Ingleby L., et al., 2013, ApJ, 767, 112
Jang-Condell H., 2008, ApJ, 679, 797
Jang-Condell H., 2009, ApJ, 700, 820
Jang-Condell H., Turner N. J., 2012, ApJ, 749, 153
Johnstone C. P., Jardine M., Gregory S. G., Donati J.-F., Hussain
G., 2014, MNRAS, 437, 3202
Jones E., Oliphant T., Peterson P., et al., 2001, SciPy: Open
source scientific tools for Python, http://www.scipy.org/
Lai D., 2014, MNRAS, 440, 3532
Larwood J. D., Nelson R. P., Papaloizou J. C. B., Terquem C.,
1996, MNRAS, 282, 597
Loomis R. A., Oberg K. I., Andrews S. M., MacGregor M. A.,
2017, ApJ, 840, 23
Mamajek E. E., 2005, ApJ, 634, 1385
Marino S., Perez S., Casassus S., 2015, ApJ, 798, L44
Marzari F., Nelson A. F., 2009, ApJ, 705, 1575
Mathis J. S., Rumpl W., Nordsieck K. H., 1977, ApJ, 217, 425
Mentiplay D., Price D. J., Pinte C., 2018, MNRAS,
Min M., Stolker T., Dominik C., Benisty M., 2017, A&A, 604,
L10
Nealon R., Dipierro G., Alexander R., Martin R. G., Nixon C.,
2018, MNRAS, 481, 20
Nixon C. J., Pringle J. E., 2010, MNRAS, 403, 1887
Pinilla P., et al., 2018, preprint, (arXiv:1810.05172)
Pinte C., M´enard F., Duchene G., Bastien P., 2006, A&A, 459,
797
Pinte C., Harries T. J., Min M., Watson A. M., Dullemond C. P.,
Woitke P., M´enard F., Dur´an-Rojas M. C., 2009, A&A, 498,
967
Pontoppidan K. M., Blake G. A., van Dishoeck E. F., Smette A.,
Ireland M. J., Brown J., 2008, ApJ, 684, 1323
Poteet C. A., et al., 2018, preprint, (arXiv:1805.01926)
Price D. J., 2007, Publ. Astron. Soc. Australia, 24, 159
Price D. J., et al., 2018a, Publ. Astron. Soc. Australia, 35, e031
Price D. J., et al., 2018b, MNRAS, 477, 1270
Pringle J. E., 1981, ARA&A, 19, 137
Qi C., et al., 2004, ApJ, 616, L11
Roberge A., Weinberger A. J., Malumuth E. M., 2005, ApJ, 622,
1171
Romanova M. M., Ustyugova G. V., Koldoba A. V., Lovelace
R. V. E., 2004, ApJ, 616, L151
Rosenfeld K. A., et al., 2012, ApJ, 757, 129
Scheuer P. A. G., Feiler R., 1996, MNRAS, 282, 291
Setiawan J., Henning T., Launhardt R., Muller A., Weise P.,
Kurster M., 2008, Nature, 451, 38
Shakura N., Sunyaev R., 1973, A&A, 24, 337
Siess L., Dufour E., Forestini M., 2000, A&A, 358, 593
Stapelfeldt K. R., et al., 1999, ApJ, 516, L95
Teague R., et al., 2018, ApJ, 864, 133
Thi W. F., et al., 2010, A&A, 518, L125
Thommes E. W., Lissauer J. J., 2003, ApJ, 597, 566
Trapman L., Miotello A., Kama M., van Dishoeck E. F., Bruderer
S., 2017, A&A, 605, A69
Tsukagoshi T., et al., 2016, ApJ, 829, L35
Walsh C., Daley C., Facchini S., Juh´asz A., 2017, A&A, 607, A114
Watson A. M., Stapelfeldt K. R., Wood K., M´enard F., 2007,
Protostars and Planets V, pp 523 -- 538
MNRAS 000, 1 -- 13 (2015)
|
math/0606548 | 3 | 0606 | 2010-01-25T09:06:32 | Dimer models for parallelograms | [
"math.AG",
"hep-th",
"math.SG"
] | We discuss the relation between dimer models and coamoebas associated with lattice parallelograms. We also discuss homological mirror symmetry for the product of two projective lines, emphasizing the role of a non-isoradial dimer model. | math.AG | math | Dimer models for parallelograms
Kazushi Ueda and Masahito Yamazaki
0
1
0
2
n
a
J
5
2
]
.
G
A
h
t
a
m
[
3
v
8
4
5
6
0
6
0
/
h
t
a
m
:
v
i
X
r
a
Abstract
We discuss the relation between dimer models and coamoebas associated with
lattice parallelograms. We also discuss homological mirror symmetry for P1 × P1,
emphasizing the role of a non-isoradial dimer model.
1
Introduction
This is a short companion paper to [8, 9], where we discuss the relation between dimer
models, coamoebas and homological mirror symmetry, following the work of string theo-
rists [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. We refer the readers to [8, 9] and references therein for notations
and backgrounds. We show the following in this paper:
• The linear Hanany-Vegh algorithm produces a unique dimer model from a lattice
parallelogram.
• For a suitable choice of a Laurent polynomial W , the zero locus W −1(0) behaves
nicely under the argument map Arg : (C×)2 → (R/Z)2.
• The dimer model is the argument projection of a graph on W −1(0), which encodes
Floer-theoretic information of vanishing cycles.
As a corollary, one obtains a torus-equivariant generalization of homological mirror sym-
metry for P1 × P1 proved by Seidel [7]. We also discuss the role of a non-isoradial dimer
model which cannot be obtained by the linear Hanany-Vegh algorithm.
2 Coamoebas for lattice parallelograms
We prove the following in this section:
Theorem 2.1. For any lattice parallelogram, there exists a Laurent polynomial W satis-
fying the following:
• The Newton polygon of W coincides with the lattice parallelogram.
• The set A of asymptotic boundaries of the coamoeba of W −1(0) is the unique ad-
missible arrangement of oriented lines associated with the lattice parallelogram.
• The coamoeba is the union of colored cells and vertices of A.
1
• The restriction of the argument map to the inverse image of a colored cell is a
diffeomorphism. It is orientation-preserving if the cell is white, and reversing if the
cell is black.
• The inverse image of a vertex of A by the argument map is homeomorphic to an
open interval.
Im x
D1
I1
I2
I3
I4 Re x
D2
Figure 2.2: The projection of W −1(0) to the
x-plane
Figure 2.4: The dimer model
Figure 2.1: A lattice square
I4
I1
U1
I3
I2
I2
U2
I1
I4
Figure 2.3: The coamoeba
Proof. Since any lattice parallelogram is obtained from the convex hull of (0, 0), (0, 1),
(1, 0) and (1, 1) shown in Figure 2.1 by a translation and an integral linear transformation,
it suffices to discuss the case
The projection
W (x, y) = xy + x − y + 1.
∈ ∈
W −1(0) → C×
7→ x
(x, y)
2
to the x-plane is injective, whose image is obtained by gluing the upper half plane
and the lower half plane
along four intervals
D1 = {x ∈ C Im(x) > 0}
D2 = {x ∈ C Im(x) < 0}
I1 = (−∞,−1), I2 = (−1, 0), I3 = (0, 1), and I4 = (1,∞).
as shown in Figure 2.2. Set
U1 = (cid:26)(θ, φ) ∈ T (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)
U2 = (cid:26)(θ, φ) ∈ T (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)
0 < θ <
1
2
, 0 < φ <
1
2(cid:27) ,
1
2
−
< θ < 0, −
1
2
< φ < 0, (cid:27) .
Then the argument map gives an orientation-reversing homeomorphism from D1 to U1
and an orientation-preserving homeomorphism from D2 to U2. The line segments I1, I2,
I3 and I4 on the boundary of D1 and D2 are mapped to four points ( 1
2, 0), (0, 0)
and (0, 1
2 ) respectively. This shows that the coamoeba of W −1(0) is as in Figure 2.3. Its
asymptotic boundaries and the corresponding dimer model is shown in Figure 2.4.
2), ( 1
2 , 1
The uniqueness of the output of the linear Hanany-Vegh algorithm can be shown in
just the same way as the case of triangles in [8, Section 5.6], and we omit the detail
here.
3 Vanishing cycles for the mirror of P1 × P1
We prove [9, Conjecture 6.2] for P1 × P1 in this section. The mirror of P1 × P1 is given
by the Laurent polynomial
W (x, y) = x −
1
x
+ y +
1
y
,
whose critical points are given by
(x, y) = (−√−1,−1), (√−1,−1), (√−1, 1), (−√−1, 1),
with critical values
(p1, p2, p3, p4) = (−2 − 2√−1,−2 + 2√−1, 2 + 2√−1, 2 − 2√−1).
Let (ci)4
i=1 be a distinguished set of vanishing paths, obtained as the straight line segments
from the origin to the critical values of W as shown in Figure 3.1. The fiber of W can be
realized as a branched cover of C by
πt : W −1(t) → C
∈
∈
1
x
7→ x −
(x, y)
3
Im W
c2
c3
c1
c4
Re W
Im s
2√−1
I3
−2
−2√−1
I2
I4
2
I1
Re s
Figure 3.1: A distinguished set of vanishing
paths
Figure 3.2: Branch points and cuts on the
s-plane
I3
I1
I4
U1
I2
U2
I4
I1
I2
U3
I4
I3
I3
U4
I1
I2
Im
Re
Figure 3.3: The glued surface W −1(0)
Figure 3.4: Behavior of the branch points
along c1
Im s
C3
C2
Re s
C4
C1
C4
C3
C2
C1
Figure 3.5: The images of four vanishing cy-
cles on the s-plane
Figure 3.6: Vanishing cycles on W −1(0)
4
1
x
x −
= s
1
y
= t − s.
(3.1)
(3.2)
for t ∈ C. The fiber of πt at a general point s ∈ C consists of four points, which is the
product of the set of solutions of
with that of
y +
The set of solutions of (3.1) degenerates at s = ±2√−1, whereas that of (3.2) degenerates
at s = ±2 + t. The fiber W −1(0) is obtained by gluing four copies U1, . . . , U4 of the s-
plane cut along four half lines I1, . . . , I4 as in Figure 3.2. The resulting surface is shown
in Figure 3.3.
Two of the four branch points of πt move as in Figure 3.4 as one varies t from 0 to
p1 = −2−2√−1 along c1. This shows that the image by π0 of the corresponding vanishing
cycle C1 is the line segment from 2 to −2√−1 up to homotopy. Figure 3.5 shows four line
segments on the s-plane, which are images of the vanishing cycles of W shown in Figure
3.6. One can equip these vanishing cycles with gradings so that the Maslov indices of the
intersection points in C1 ∩ C2, C2 ∩ C3, and C3 ∩ C4 are 1. Then the Maslov indices of
intersection points in C1 ∩ C4 are 2. The dot in Figure 3.6 shows our choice of branch
points for the non-trivial spin structures.
I4
I3
I4
I1
U1
I1
I2
U2
I3
I2
U3
U4
Figure 3.7: The graph on W −1(0)
Figure 3.8: The coamoeba
Figure 3.9: The dimer model G
Figure 3.10: The perfect matching D
There are four quadrangles in W −1(0) bounded by S4
i=1 Ci, which correspond to A∞-
operations in Fuk W . By contracting these quadrangles, one obtains the bicolored graph
in Figure 3.7. Figure 3.8 shows the coamoeba of W −1(0), and Figure 3.9 shows the dimer
model G. Here, the black node on the top left in Figure 3.9 corresponds to U1 in Figure
3.8.
5
The perfect matching D coming from the order in the distinguished basis of vanishing
cycles is shown in Figure 3.10. The full strong exceptional collection of line bundles on
P1 × P1 associated with the pair (G, D) is given by
(E1, E2, E3, E4) = (O,O(1, 0),O(1, 1),O(2, 1)),
(3.3)
where O(i, j) = OP1(i) ⊠ OP1(j) denotes the exterior tensor product of the i-th and j-th
tensor powers of the hyperplane bundle on P1 for i, j ∈ Z.
4 Non-isoradial dimer model and vanishing cycles
In this section, we discuss the role of the non-isoradial dimer model in Figure 4.16 below,
which corresponds to the full strong exceptional collection
(E1, E2, E3, E4) = (O,O(1, 0),O(0, 1),O(1, 1))
(4.1)
of line bundles on P1× P1. This collection is obtained from the collection (3.3) by the right
mutation at the last term, and the corresponding vanishing paths are shown in Figure
4.1. Figure 4.2 shows the images of vanishing cycles by the projection to the s-plane. The
vanishing cycles on W −1(0) are shown in Figure 4.3, and by contracting eight triangles
bounded by them, one obtains the bicolored graph on W −1(0) shown in Figure 4.4.
Unfortunately, the argument projection of this graph does not give a dimer model.
Figure 4.5 shows the image of this graph on the s-plane. Here, two white dots are images
of eight nodes, and four black dots are branch points where the fiber becomes two points
instead of four points.
Consider the deformation
from
to
Wt(x, y) = x +
2t − 1
x
+ y +
t + 1
y
W0(x, y) = x −
W1(x, y) = x +
1
x
1
x
+ y +
+ y +
1
y
2
y
.
Figure 4.6 shows the behavior of the branch points under this deformation. The graph
in Figure 4.5 is deformed to the graph in Figure 4.7. We put labels on this graph as in
Figure 4.8.
Note that the map
C× → C
∈ ∈
7→ x + 1
x
x
from the x-plane to the s-plane is a branched double cover, which maps both the upper
half plane and the lower half plane into the whole s-plane minus
I = I+a I− = {s ∈ R s ≥ 2},
6
Im W
c1
c2
c3
c4
Re W
Im s
C3
C4
Re s
C2
C1
Figure 4.1: A distinguished set of vanishing
paths
Figure 4.2: Images of vanishing cycles
I3
I1
C4
C3
C2
C1
I4
U1
I2
U2
I4
I2
I1
U3
I3
I3
I4
U4
I2
I1
Figure 4.3: Vanishing cycles on W −1(0)
Figure 4.4: The graph on W −1(0)
7
Im s
Im s
Re s
Re s
Figure 4.5: The image of the graph on the
s-plane
Im s
Figure 4.6: Behavior of the branch points
Re s
6
5
4
3
2
1
Figure 4.8: Labels on the graph on the s-
plane
Figure 4.7: The deformed graph
8
Figure 4.9: Division of the s-plane
Figure 4.10: Division of the x-plane
6
5
4
3
4
5
6
1
2
1
2
1
2
3
3
5
6
5
4
4
Figure 4.11: The graph on the x-plane
Figure 4.12: The graph on the y-plane
and the real axis into I. The inverse image of the interval I0 = {s ∈ R s ≤ 2} is the
circle {x ∈ C x = 1}. Figures 4.9 and 4.10 shows this behavior. The same is true for
the s-projection from the y-plane
C× →
∈ ∈
y
7→ −y − 2
C
x
up to the minus sign and a rescaling.
Figures 4.11 and 4.12 shows the pull-back of the graph on the s-plane in Figure 4.8
to the x-plane and the y-plane respectively. This shows that the argument projection of
the graph on W −1(0) looks as in Figure 4.13. Although the restriction of the argument
projection to the graph is not injective, one can perturb the graph slightly to obtain the
graph in Figure 4.14. This graph is combinatorially identical to the graph in Figure 4.15,
which gives the non-isoradial dimer model in Figure 4.16.
Acknowledgment: K. U. is supported by Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (No.18840029).
9
3
4
5
6
5
4
3
1
2
2
1
3
4
5
6
5
4
3
3
3
4
5
6
5
4
1
1
2
2
1
1
4
5
6
5
4
3
3
Figure 4.13: The graph on the torus
Figure 4.14: A perturbed graph
3
3
1
4
4
1
5
6
5
2
2
5
6
5
1
4
4
1
3
3
Figure 4.15: A deformed graph
Figure 4.16: The non-isoradial dimer model
10
References
[1] Bo Feng, Yang-Hui He, Kristian D. Kennaway, and Cumrun Vafa. Dimer models from
mirror symmetry and quivering amoebae. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 12(3):489 -- 545,
2008.
[2] Sebasti´an Franco, Amihay Hanany, Dario Martelli, James Sparks, David Vegh, and
Brian Wecht. Gauge theories from toric geometry and brane tilings. J. High Energy
Phys., (1):128, 40 pp. (electronic), 2006.
[3] Sebasti´an Franco, Amihay Hanany, David Vegh, Brian Wecht, and Kristian D. Kenn-
away. Brane dimers and quiver gauge theories. J. High Energy Phys., (1):096, 48 pp.
(electronic), 2006.
[4] Amihay Hanany, Christopher P. Herzog, and David Vegh. Brane tilings and excep-
tional collections. J. High Energy Phys., (7):001, 44 pp. (electronic), 2006.
[5] Amihay Hanany and Kristian D. Kennaway. Dimer models and toric diagrams. hep-
th/0503149, 2005.
[6] Amihay Hanany and David Vegh. Quivers, tilings, branes and rhombi. J. High Energy
Phys., (10):029, 35, 2007.
[7] Paul Seidel. More about vanishing cycles and mutation. In Symplectic geometry and
mirror symmetry (Seoul, 2000), pages 429 -- 465. World Sci. Publishing, River Edge,
NJ, 2001.
[8] Kazushi Ueda and Masahito Yamazaki. A note on dimer models and McKay quivers.
math.AG/0605780.
[9] Kazushi Ueda and Masahito Yamazaki. Homological mirror symmetry for toric orb-
ifolds of toric del Pezzo surfaces. math.AG/0703267.
Kazushi Ueda
Department of Mathematics, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Machikaneyama
1-1, Toyonaka, Osaka, 560-0043, Japan.
e-mail address : [email protected]
Masahito Yamazaki
Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1,
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
e-mail address : [email protected]
11
|
1806.03035 | 1 | 1806 | 2018-06-08T09:22:07 | Examples and non-examples of polyhedral K\"ahler surfaces | [
"math.AG",
"math.MG"
] | Polyhedral K\"ahler surfaces are a class of complex surfaces, which are flat everywhere except on a two-dimensional skeleton. They are defined as a generalisation of the "gluing a polygon side by side" construction of flat Riemann surfaces.
In this article, we introduce two classes of polyhedral K\"ahler surfaces with trivial holonomy: products of polyhedral K\"ahler curves with zero holonomy and ramified coverings of tori, and prove that none of these classes is contained in the other. Existence of other types of polyhedral K\"ahler surfaces is still open. | math.AG | math |
Examples and non-examples of polyhedral Kähler surfaces
Cécile Gachet
June 11, 2018
Abstract
Polyhedral Kähler surfaces are a class of complex surfaces, which are flat everywhere except on a
two-dimensional skeleton. They are defined as a generalisation of the "gluing a polygon side by side"
construction of flat Riemann surfaces.
In this article, we introduce two classes of polyhedral Kähler surfaces with trivial holonomy:
products of polyhedral Kähler curves with zero holonomy and ramified coverings of tori, and prove
that none of these classes is contained in the other. Existence of other types of polyhedral Kähler
surfaces is still open.
Contents
1 Introduction
1.1 Definition and examples of P K manifolds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.2 Complex Kähler structure and flat metric on P K surfaces or curves
. . . . . . . . . . . .
1.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2 Does a P K 0 product of curves cover a torus?
2.1 Characterising P K 0 curves
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2 Does a P K 0 curve cover of a torus?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.3 Generalising to products of P K 0 curves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 Characterizing P K 0 product of curves
3.1 Some more definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2 Excursion in the realm of complex tori . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3 Extend line bundles
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.4 P K 0 surfaces with two complex direction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.5 Ramified torus over three curves of different complex direction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
References
2
2
3
4
5
5
6
8
8
8
9
10
11
11
12
1
1 Introduction
1.1 Definition and examples of P K manifolds
There is a well-known construction of flat Riemann surfaces with conical singularities, occurring by gluing
two-by-two sides of same lengths of a polygon P Ă C. The resulting topological surface S naturally
inherits a complex structure, which is flat except at a finite number of singular points: charts are trivial
at neighbourhoods of points not being vertices of P , and any vertex x of P has a neighbourhood Ux Ă S
isometric to the cone Cα Ă C centred at zero of conical angle 2πα, so that the map z P Cα » Ux ÞÝÑ zα P C
is a chart.
This point of view on Riemann surfaces is given several motivations in the survey [5] by A. Zorich.
One of them is the definition of the so-called Teichmüller geodesic flow on the moduli space of genus
g Riemann surfaces (and even on the Teichmüller spaces, because the flow preserves a given choice of
representatives of the fundamental group). It is defined as follows: fix a polygon with sides which are
two-by-two identified by translations, so that you can glue it to a flat Riemann surface X0. Fixing a
real direction in this polygon, scaling in this direction and gluing the new polygon according to the old
gluing-pattern, we get a new flat Riemann surface of the same topological type as X0. This defines
our Teichmüller geodesic flow. Its orbits and ergodic properties are studied in geometry as well as in
dynamical systems.
The initial gluing-procedure can be generalised to higher dimensions to construct so-called polyhedral
manifolds.
Definition 1.1. Consider M a 2n-dimensional R-smooth manifold together with some fixed simplicial
decomposition, and endow it with a flat metric obtained by isometrical gluing of choices of flat metrics
on each 2n-dimensional simplex. Then M is called a polyhedral manifold.
From now on, let us consider for convenience only connected manifolds.
Definition 1.2. If M 2n is a polyhedral manifold, let Ms be the union of all its simplices of codimension
at least 2. Then M zMs clearly has a complex structure, so that the holonomy of M is well-defined as the
holonomy of M zMs. This holonomy is called unitary if it is a subgroup of U pnq.
For n " 1, we were lucky enough to get an additional complex structure on M . This does not arise
in general, for M may have a non-unitary holonomy: U p1q " SOp2q but U pnq Ĺ SOp2nq in higher
dimension.
Actually, a more careful study sheds light on another obstruction. Let M 2n be a polyhedral manifold
of unitary holonomy, Ms its 2-skeleton. Let us introduce a few useful concepts for studying the singular
locus of the flat metric, Ms. First, if x P Ms does not belong to any simplex of codimension greater or equal
to 3 (x is in a face Fx of codimension 2 of the simplicial decomposition), then there is a neighbourhood
x P Ux Ă M isometric to Cα R2n´2. We call 2πα the conical angle at x. In particular, if M is P K 0,
all such conical angles are in 2πZ. Moreover, this isometry carries the natural parallel complex structure
of Ux X pM zMsq to a parallel complex structure on C
α R2n´2, which can be extended by continuity to
Cα R2n´2. If t0u R2n´2 is stable under this complex structure, the face Fx is said to have a complex
direction.
Definition 1.3. A polyhedral manifold M 2n is said to be polyhedral Kähler (PK) if it has unitary
holonomy and each face of codimension 2 has a complex direction. It is called a P K curve if n " 1, a
P K surface if n " 2. We may also encounter polyhedral Kähler manifolds with trivial holonomy, being
referred to as P K 0 manifolds.
Example 1.4. Let n ě 2. A covering of the torus T 4 ramified with conical angle 2πn over the complex
curve tpx " a ` ib, y " c ` idq P T 4 y " 0u is a P K manifold. It also holds if ramified over the complex
curve tpx, yq P T 4 x " yu. If ramified over tpa, b, c, dq P T 4 b " d " 0u however, it is not polyhedral
Kähler, for the ramified locus has no complex direction.
More generally, the following result holds. Its proof is postponed to Section 3.2, where various results
about complex tori are recalled.
2
Proposition 1.5. Let T be a two-dimensional complex torus and C1, . . . , Cn complex curves with fixed
complex directions in T. Assume that no three of them have a common intersection point. Then the
ramified cover of T over these curves is a P K 0 surface.
Example 1.6. We will see in Section 2.1 that P K 0 curves are exactly flat Riemann surfaces with trivial
holonomy and a finite number of singular points. A product of two flat Riemann surfaces with trivial
holonomy and a finite number of singular points is a P K 0 surface.
Remark 1.7. There is a priori no way to scale a given P K 0 surface X, let alone to define an analogous
of the Teichmüller geodesic flow on moduli spaces of P K 0 surfaces. That is a motivation for us to study
some families of P K 0 surfaces on which natural scalings may arise. For instance, P K 0 product of curves
definitely have such scalings. On the other hand, even a P K 0 surface X arising as a ramified covering
π : X Ñ B of a scalable P K 0 surface B may have no scaling induced by B. A scaling of B lifting up
to X is indeed defined as a scaling of B compatible with the P K 0 structure considered on X; for that, it
should send any irreducible component of πpXsq to a curve in B which still has a complex direction.
Remark 1.8. If a scaling of B is not compatible with one P K 0 structure of X (in the sense of the previous
remark), it may still be compatible with another (biholomorphic but not isometric) P K 0 structure on X.
Unfortunately, we do not understand relations between various biholomorphic P K 0 structures on a given
P K 0 manifold.
1.2 Complex Kähler structure and flat metric on P K surfaces or curves
We already mentioned a natural complex structure arising on any P K 0 curve. Actually, P K 0 surfaces
are trickier to handle; let us just quote here a theorem of [4]:
Theorem (by Dima Panov) On any polyhedral Kähler surface M , a natural parallel complex structure
on M zMs can be extended to M by charts on points of Ms, in order to obtain a smooth complex structure
on M . This complex flat structure is Kähler. Moreover, Ms is a union of complex curves for this
structure.
We do not need this theorem in Section 2: P K 0 surfaces arising as a product of two P K 0 curves have
indeed an explicit complex structure. It will appear to be mostly important in Section 3, significantly
enough the third part about the structure of Ms.
Let us denote by Ω1pXq the sheaf of holomorphic 1-forms on a complex manifold X. Combining
complex structure and flat metric on P K 0 surfaces and curves yields to the following definition:
Definition 1.9. A holomorphic 1-form on an n-dimensional P K 0 manifold is said to be compatible with
the flat structure if at any non-singular point, it is locally pulled back from a form of constant coefficients
a1 dz1 ` . . . ` an dzn on Cn by the isometric local chart.
Remark 1.10. Particularly, on a P K 0 curve X, the set of all holomorphic 1-forms compatible with the
flat structure is 1-dimensional in H 0pΩ1pXqq, which is itself of dimension gpXq. Taking this compatibility
with the flat structure into account will appear as a nice way to distinguish a special abelian differential
(up to multiplicative constant). It will be used thoroughly in the proof of theorem B.
At last, we should say that the "Kähler part" of D. Panov's theorem is not proven in [4]. For sake of
self-contentedness, let us sketch here an argument for proving due to Misha Verbitsky and Dima Panov.
It uses the following lemma:
Lemma 1.11. On a non-Kähler surface, squares of (1,1)-forms are non-positive.
The proof of this lemma is to be found in an upcoming book by Misha Verbitsky and Liviu Ornea
about the classification of complex surfaces.
In this article, we actually just need to prove that a P K 0 surface can not be a Hopf surface (Sec-
tion 3.3), hence finding a non-zero (1,1)-form is already enough for our purpose (even if it has some
degenerations).
3
Proof of the existence of a (1,1)-form of positive square on a P K 0 surface. Let M be a P K 0 surface with
singular locus Ms of real codimension at least 2 and S singular locus of codimension 4. Let ω be the
Kähler form associated with the flat metric on M zMs.
For p P MszS, Up a chart neighbourhood of p and V a flat open chart set intersecting Up, with
flat coordinates z1, z2. There are some coordinates pz, z1q on Up, pz3, z1q on C2 in which there is a
chart pz, z1q P Up Ñ pzn, z1q P C2 centered at p " p0, 0q with Ms " tz " 0u locally. We can also
write z3 :" az1 ` bz2 " 0 for some constants a, b P C, say b ‰ 0. Then on Ux X V , dz1 " dz1 and
dz2 " b´1pnzn´1 dz ´ a dz1q. Since
ω "
i
2
p dz1 ^ dz1 ` dz2 ^ dz2q
2 p1`ab´12q dz1 ^ dz1
on V , rewriting in coordinates pz, z1q on Ux XV extends it holomorphically to ω " i
on Ms X Ux. This does not depend of the choice of V since M has trivial holonomy, so that dz1 can be
chosen globally on M zMs.
For p P S now, we can extend ω by Hartogs theorem (in the basis of local (1,1)-forms, ω is indeed
given by a finite number of holomorphic functions defined everywhere except at the (real codimension 4)
point p).
Hence, ω extends to a global closed (1,1)-form on M . It has some degenerations, so it is not Kähler
itself; nevertheless its square is still the local volume form almost everywhere, so it equals 2.
1.3 Results
Remember that a P K 0 curve X has an Albanese variety: AlbpXq " H 0pΩ1pXqq{ιpH1pX, Zqq where
ι : rγs P H1pX, Zq ÞÑ
ω ÞÑ ż
γ
ω
‚P H 0pΩ1pXqq
is an embedding. This AlbpXq is a complex torus, and fixing x0 P X, we have a map
x P X ÞÑ x ´ x0 P Pic0pXq » AlbpXq.
Even with the P K assumption though, there is no reason why this map should be a (-n eventually
ramified) covering. Actually, we prove in Section 2 that:
Theorem A A P K 0 curve is a ramified covering of a torus if and only if there are two directions V and
H such that V -periods (respectively H-periods) form a discrete subgroup of R.
Remark 1.12. This is actually equivalent to the fact that for any two distinct directions V and H,
V -periods (resp. H-periods) form a discrete subgroup of R, or also to the fact that periods form a lattice
in C.
This idea enables us to construct P K 0 surfaces which are products of two curves but not ramified
coverings of tori, by theorem B of Section 2.3:
Theorem B A product of two P K 0 curves X " C1 C2 is a ramified covering of a torus T if and only
if C1 and C2 both are ramified coverings of tori.
In Section 3, we consider the converse problem: which P K 0 surfaces are products of two curves? The
answer depends actually on the set of complex directions of X realised by codimension 2 faces. After a
few definitions postponed to Section 3, we will be able to prove the following result:
Theorem C Let X be a P K 0 surface. If it has at most two relevant complex directions, it is a product
of curves. Moreover, there are P K 0 surfaces with three relevant complex directions not being products of
curves.
4
U1
U2
U3
Figure 1: Topological argument to choose T in the proof of lemma 2.2
2 Does a P K 0 product of curves cover a torus?
2.1 Characterising P K 0 curves
All starts with the following correspondence.
Proposition 2.1. A P K 0 curve is the same as a zero holonomy flat Riemann surface with a finite
number of singular points.
The direct inclusion has already been proved.
Let X be a zero holonomy flat Riemann surface with a finite number of singular points. Since the
surface has zero holonomy, we can fix a direction in the tangent space at each point of X; let's call it
the north. Completing this unitary vector field into an indirect orthonormal basis of T X, we can define
an orthogonal unitary vector field east. For all x P X, we denote by lx : R Ñ X the geodesic path of
northern direction such that lxp0q " x and mx the analogous eastern path.
To prove that X is a P K 0 curve, we are going to use the following result.
Lemma 2.2. There is a compact geodesic arc of eastern direction S such that for all x P X, the path lx
crosses S.
Proof. Actually, take any p P X and the geodesic arc of eastern direction S " mppr´T, T sq, for some
T to be chosen in a while. Let U " tx P X lx crosses Su.
It contains S. For a well-chosen T , U
even contains a neighbourhood of S. Indeed, mppRq Ă X is compact, so finitely covered by open sets
U1, . . . , UN of X trivialising the north-east grid and of eastern diameter smaller than 2. Without loss of
generality, mppRq X Uj ‰ ∅ for all j. Since mppRq " Ťną0 mppr´n, nsq, there is some big enough n such
that mppr´n, nsq X Uj ‰ ∅ for all j. Then T " n ` 1 is fine.
This argument is depicted on figure 1, with mppr´1, 1sq in blue, the remaining part of mppr´2, 2sq in
green, the remaining part of mppr´3, 3sq in cyan, and the remaining part of mppRq in red. On this figure,
T " 3 is fine.
U is open in X: let x P U and t0 P R such that lxpt0q " s0 P S. Then, y P X ÞÑ lypt0q P X being a
local diffeomorphism, we restrict it to a diffeomorphism between neighbourhoods Vx and Vs0 on which
the north-east grid is trivial. Since U contains a neighbourhood of S, Vs0 Ă U . Composing by lp´t0q
yields Vx Ă U .
And U is also closed:
let x P X approached by a sequence pxnq P U N. We have ptnq, psnq such
that lxnptnq " sn P S. Since S is compact, we can assume that both psn, tnq converge to ps, tq P
S R Y t´8, `8u. If x P lspRq Ă U , it's fine. Else, x can actually be approached by a sequence in lspRq;
in a neighbourhood of x trivialising the north-east grid, lspRq is just a set of parallel lines of northern
direction. So there are some a, b P R such that mxpaq " lspbq. Since north and east define locally constant
vector fields with zero Lie bracket, their flow commute, so s1 " msp´aq P S satisfies ls1 pbq " x.
By connectedness, U " X.
For now on, let S be as in the previous lemma.
5
Figure 2: Strip decomposition locally around S0 (black points are singularities)
Figure 3: Gluing rectangles to construct X
Proof of Proposition 2.1. Let ε ą 0 such that l : ps, tq P S p´ε, εq ÞÑ lsptq P X is injective. Let U be
its image. Since U Ă X has non zero Lebesgue measure, by Poincaré recurrence theorem, for almost all
s P S there is a time tU psq ą ε such that lsptU psqq P U and hence tpsq P ptU psq ´ ε, tU psq ` εq such that
lsptpsqq P S. Without loss of generality, we can assume that tpsq ą 0 is minimal and call it the first return
time of ls. By almost all, we understand S1 Ă S such that lpS1 p´ε, εqq and lpS p´ε, εqq have the
same Lebesgue measure.
Let us cover X by a finite set C of open balls trivialising the north-east grid. If x P S1 and lx does not
go through any singular point before its first return to S, then there is a neighbourhood x P Vx Ă S such
that for all t P r0, tpxqs and for all y P Vx, an open ball of C contains both lyptq and lxptq. Then all ly for
y P Vx are parallel paths with constant distance to each other before their first return to S and they all
have the same first return time tpyq " tpxq. Particularly, Vx Ă S1. So S " S1 by connectedness.
Hence, this construction defines a striped decomposition of X in the following sense (see figure 2): a
strip is an element of
tlxptq x P S, t P r0, tpxqq, lxpsq is not a singular point for s ă tpxqu {„
where „ is the finest equivalence relation such that lxpsq „ lxptq if x P S, s, t P r0, tpxqq and x „ y if x P S
and y P Vx. According to Lemma 2.2, strips partition X. This gives equivalently a construction of X
from glued rectangles as in figure 3.
Hence, X is a P K 0 curve.
2.2 Does a P K 0 curve cover of a torus?
Let us come to the proof of theorem A. First, we state what we mean by V and H-periods.
6
Figure 4: The finite sheeted ramified covering X Ñ C{Γ
Definition 2.3. Let X be a P K 0 surface with a complex flat structure with associated 1-form dz; X is
obtained from gluing rectangles as in the proof of Proposition 2.1. For any closed path γ on X,
dz " a ` ib P C,
ż
γ
and a (respectively b) is called an H-period (respectively a V -period) of X. We may refer to a as the
H-period on the path γ.
Remark 2.4. The set of all H-periods of X is a subgroup PH of R. Actually, it is finitely generated, by
the H-periods on horizontal paths between singular points of X (e.g. on the figure 3, these paths are only
the coloured segments).
Proposition 2.5. If both PH and PV are discrete subgroups of R (or equivalently the set of all periods is
a discrete subgroup of C), then X is a ramified covering of the complex torus C{Γ, where Γ " PH ` iPV .
Proof. Let Γ " PH ` iPV . Consider the rectangle decomposition of X as a (simply-connected) polygonal
closed set X Ă C from which X is glued by the projection p : X Ñ X. Fixing a base point and
integrating dz along paths contained in X, we define an injective, holomorphic map: X Ñ C. Composed
with the canonical C Ñ C{Γ, it yields a finite-sheeted surjective map X Ñ C{Γ which is a covering inside
X. It is depicted in figure 4.
By definition of Γ, this factorizes through p and we get a map: X Ñ C{Γ, which is a finite-sheeted
covering ramified only at points corresponding to vertices of X, that is to say at the singular points of
X.
We are now left with the converse statement of theorem A.
Proposition 2.6. Let X be a P K 0 curve and a ramified covering of a torus π : X Ñ C{Γ as well. Then
PH and PV both are discrete subgroups of R.
Proof. It is equivalent to show that PH ` iPV is a discrete subgroup of C, which is clear since:
PH ` iPV " $&
ż
%
γ
dz γ closed path on X,.
-
ż
γ 1
Ă $&
%
dz γ1 closed path on C{Γ,.
-
" Γ.
Remark 2.7. By Remark 2.4, if X is given with its rectangle decomposition, we can easily construct a
finite number of generators of PH and PV . Checking that PH and PV are discrete is then tantamount to
checking that a few generators are commensurable, which is quite an effective criterion.
7
2.3 Generalising to products of P K 0 curves
Let us now prove theorem B.
Proof. The converse direction is clear.
Let now π : X " C1 C2 Ñ T be a ramified covering of a torus by a product of P K 0 curves. Let us
prove that both curves C1 and C2 are ramified coverings of complex one-dimensional tori.
Denote by dz1, dz2 the unique (up to a complex multiplicative constant) holomorphic flat differentials
on C1, C2, and take a basis of flat differentials dz, dw on T. For any fixed b P C2, we pull them back by
fb : C1 » C1 tbu ãÑ C1 C2
πÝÑ T.
These pull-backs are holomorphic flat differentials on C1, so multiples of dz1, and their periods are
the same as the periods of the forms dz, dw on the torus, so discrete subgroups of C. But by Proposition
2.5, the periods of a non-zero multiple of dz1 form a discrete subgroup of C1 if and only if C1 is a ramified
covering of a torus.
Hence, if we assume that C1 is not a ramified covering of a torus (working by contradiction), we get
f
b p dzq " f
b p dwq " 0, that is to say that at a point pa, bq P C1 C2, both linear forms pπ dzqpa,bq and
pπ dwqpa,bq on the tangent space Tpa,bqpXq have the same one-dimensional kernel Tpa,bqpC1 tbuq. So
these two linear forms π dz, π dw are proportional. But dz, dw were set linearly independent on T,
absurd!
So C1 is a ramified covering of a torus.
Remark 2.8. The compatibility of our pull-backs of holomorphic 1-forms with the flat structures arises
from the fact that we always pull back through local isometries (for π, it is example 3.4.4 in [2]). It is
very important since our main criterion, that is theorem A, focuses on periods for a holomorphic 1-form
dz compatible with the flat structure.
3 Characterizing P K 0 product of curves
3.1 Some more definitions
Let X be a P K 0 surface with 2-skeleton Xs.
Definition 3.1. A complex direction of X is defined as a parallel line bundle on XzXs which is also a
subsheaf of Ω1pXzXsq.
Let F be a codimension 2 face of X and Fs be the set of points x P F which are codimension 4
singularities of X. In a neighbourhood of a point x P F zFs, there is a chart pz, z1q P Ux Ă X ÞÑ pzn, z1q P
C2 such that locally F X Ux " tz " 0u.
Definition 3.2. The complex direction of F is the unique complex direction LF of X defined on XzXs Y
F zFs such that LF pUxq " C dz Ă Ω1pXzXs Y F zFsq.
Definition 3.3. A complex direction L of X is said relevant if there is a codimension 2 face F of X
such that L " LF .
Examining whether X could be a product of curves, we will be interested in eventual splittings of its
cotangent bundle. Our first goal is to extend certain complex directions of X to the whole surface. This
works out when two or less distinct complex directions of X are relevant.
Then we give an example of a P K 0 surface X with three relevant complex directions, which is not
a product of two curves. It arises as a ramified covering of a torus over some elliptic curves. Let us
summarize some useful facts about flat elliptic curves inside a complex 2-dimensional torus, and deduce
some easy statements on ramified coverings of tori and P K 0 surfaces.
8
3.2 Excursion in the realm of complex tori
Definition 3.4. Two complex tori T1, T2 of same complex dimension n are said isogenous if one of these
equivalent conditions is satisfied:
• there is a finite-sheeted covering T1 Ñ T2 ;
• there is a finite-sheeted covering T2 Ñ T1 ;
• there are lattices Λ1, Λ2 of Cn such that Ti is biholomorphic to Cn{Λi and for some non-zero integers
n1, n2, n1Λ1 " n2Λ2.
Isogeny defines an equivalence relation on the moduli space of complex n-dimensional tori: we denote it
ambiguously by ».
Definition 3.5. Given a flat elliptic curve C inside a complex n-dimensional torus T, there is a holo-
morphic local flat coordinate z on T such that C is locally given by an equation of the form z " c for a
constant c P Cn. This coordinate z is actually globally defined up to an additive constant. Let us call it
the coordinate induced by C: up to additive and multiplicative constant, it is unique.
Two flat elliptic curves C1, C2 in T are said parallel if their induced coordinates can be made equal
by constant shift and rescaling.
Lemma 3.6. Let T be a flat two-dimensional complex torus containing two non parallel flat elliptic
curves C1, C2. Then T » C1 C2.
Proof. Let z1, z2 be the coordinates of T induced by C1, C2. Since they are globally defined up to additive
constant, they induce global holomorphic maps z1 : T Ñ C{Γ1, z2 : T Ñ C{Γ2 for some lattices Γ1, Γ2.
The equation zi " ci is now a global equation for Ci (for a good choice of ci) and there is a projection
in the local basis z1, z2 given by px1, x2q P T ÞÑ ppc1, x1q, pc2, x2qq P C1 C2. Hence, T is a finite-sheeted
covering of C1 C2.
We can now prove Proposition 1.5.
Proof of Proposition 1.5. Let T be a torus and C1, . . . , Cn flat curves in T with no three of them having
a common intersection point. Let X be a ramified covering of T over C1, . . . , Cn. It has trivial holonomy;
it is only left to check the local condition that it should be polyhedral Kähler.
It is clear outside of the ramification locus. In a neighbourhood of a point belonging to only one
ramification line, there are two local coordinate z1, z2 as in the proof of Lemma 3.6 making the situation
isometric to: pz1, z2q ÞÑ pzm
1 , z2q P C2 over a neighbourhood of the point p0, 0q, with ramification line
tz1 " 0u. Take any ε ą 0. Gluing cubes
Cubk " tpz1, z2q P C2 z1, z2 ă ε, argpz1q P rπk, πpk ` 1qsu
by isometries for k P Z{2mZ, we get a local P K 0 model of our singularity.
In a neighbourhood of an intersection point of two ramification lines, the situation is again as in
2 q P C2 over a neighbourhood of p0, 0q. Then
1 , zn
Lemma 3.6, that is to say like in the chart pz1, z2q ÞÑ pzm
consider all cubes
Cubk,l " tpz1, z2q P C2 z1, z2 ă ε, argpz1q P rπk, πpk ` 1qsu, argpz2q P rπl, πpl ` 1qsu
for k P Z{2mZ, l P Z{2nZ and glue Cubk,l with Cubk`1,l (respectively Cubk,l with Cubk,l`1) on the side
argpz1q " πpk ` 1q (respectively argpz2q " πpl ` 1q) by the identity. This gives a local P K 0 model of our
product-type singularity.
Remark 3.7. Let X be a P K 0 surface and a ramified covering of a complex flat two-dimensional torus
π : X Ñ T over curves C1, . . . , Cn Ă T. Let Xs be as usual the singular locus of X as a P K 0 surface.
Then πpXsq is a union of flat elliptic curves inside T, since any codimension 2 face of X has a fixed
complex direction. Conversely, each π´1pCiq is a curve of fixed complex direction in X. There is generally
no equality between πpXsq and C1 Y . . . Y Cn.
Remark 3.8. If a flat torus contains three flat elliptic curves C1, C2, C3, none of them parallel, then
the projections C3 Ñ C1, C3 Ñ C2 are non-zero, so C1, C2, C3 are isogenous. To that extent, considering
P K 0 surfaces being ramified over at least three curves on a torus is a very nice and specific situation.
9
3.3 Extend line bundles
In the forthcoming proofs, we need to extend line bundles near some singularities. Let us prepare for it
with the following results.
Definition 3.9. If L is a line bundle on XzXs and a subsheaf of Ω1pXzXsq, we will call a line bundle
L an extension of L to the set U if XzXs Ă U Ă X, L is a subsheaf of Ω1pU q, and the pull-back of L by
the injection XzXs ãÑ U is equal to L.
In order to extend line bundles near singularities of complex codimension 2, there is the lemma 3.2
from [3] by Fabricio Catanese and Mateo Franciosi:
Definition 3.10. Let X be a complex surface. A special tensor ω is a never-vanishing global section of
the sheaf
SpT :" Sym2pΩ1pXqq b pdet Ω1pXqq´1 » End0pT Xq,
tangent space, the isomorphism of sheaves is given by
where End0pT Xq is the sheaf of trace zero endomorphisms of T X. Locally, in a basis ´ B
a .
ÞÝÑ ´a a22
dz2 b dz2
dz1 ^ dz2
dz1 b dz1
dz1 ^ dz2
dz1 b dz2 ` dz2 b dz1
dz1 ^ dz2
` a22
Bz1
, B
Bz2¯ of the
a11
` a
a11
Remark 3.11. On a compact complex surface, the fact that a special tensor is never-vanishing is tanta-
mount to the fact that its (holomorphic on X, hence constant) determinant as endomorphism of T X is
non-zero.
Proposition 3.12. Let X be a complex surface. A splitting of Ω1pXq as direct sum of two line bundles
M1, M2 is equivalent to the existence of a special tensor ω on X. As it happens, one can assume that
locally, if Mi " C dzi, then ω corresponds to the diagonal endomorphism of the tangent space with
eigenvalues ´1, 1 and respective eigenvectors
.
B
, B
Bz2
Bz1
Let us use theses results to prove:
Lemma 3.13. Let X is a complex surface with a finite set of marked points S. Suppose either that X is
compact or that each s P S is contained in a compact complex curve C Ă X. If there are two line bundles
M1, M2 such that Ω1pXzSq " M1 ' M2, then one can extend them (in the sense of Definition 3.10) as
M1, M2 to X. It yields a splitting Ω1pXq " M1 ' M2.
Proof. Combine Proposition 3.9 on the complex surface XzS, the fact that the sheaf SpT is locally the
same as a 3-dimensional free sheaf of holomorphic functions and Hartogs' extension theorem to define a
global section of SpT on X. Its determinant is non-zero on XzS; at a point s P S belonging to a compact
complex curve C (respectively to X, if it is compact), since the determinant should be holomorphic, hence
constant and non-zero on C (respectively X), we get detpωsq ‰ 0, so ωs ‰ 0. So we have a special tensor
on X, and the converse direction of Proposition 3.12 applies to split the cotangent bundle of X.
Near complex codimension 1 singularities, we extend line bundles thanks to the following result:
Lemma 3.14. Let X be a P K 0 surface with 2-skeleton Xs and C Ă Xs an irreducible component. Let Cs
be the set of complex codimension 2 singularities of X belonging to C. Let x P CzCs with a neighbourhood
Vx Ă X not intersecting Cs. Let L1, L2 two holomorphic line bundles defined on VxzC such that L1 is
the complex direction of C. Then L1, L2 can be extended to holomorphic line bundles on a neighbourhood
x P Ux Ă Vx.
Proof. Reducing to a smaller neighbourhood Ux Ă Vx, we have a chart φx : pz1, z2q P Ux Ñ pzn
1 , z2q P C2,
in local coordinates pz1, z2). This coordinate system can be chosen such that L1, L2 are spanned by the
1-forms dz1, dz2 on UxzC.
Let us take local coordinates z, z2 on Ux pulled back from pz1, z2q through this chart: nzn´1 dz "
dz1, dz2 " dz2. Setting L1pUxq " C dz and L2pUxq " C dz2 makes sense and gives rise to the two
extended holomorphic line bundles as wished.
Remark 3.15. Complex codimension 1 singularities are tackled locally, whereas we need some global
hypothesis (some compactness condition) to deal with complex codimension 2 singularities.
10
3.4 P K 0 surfaces with two complex direction
We start by recalling a result of [1] to characterise a product of complex curves.
Theorem (by Arnaud Beauville) Let X be a compact complex surface. Its tangent bundle splits if
and only if the universal cover of X is a product of two complex surfaces U V and the fundamental
group π1pXq acts diagonally on U V , or X is a Hopf surface with universal cover C2zt0u and π1pXq »
Z ' Z{mZ generated by px, yq ÞÑ pαx, βyqq with α ď β ă 1 and px, yq ÞÑ pλx, µyq with λ, µ primitive
m-roots of unity for some m P N.
Since a Hopf surface can not be a P K 0 surface as proven in Section 1.2, we are left to prove
Proposition 3.16. Let X be a P K 0 surface with at most two complex directions. Then its cotangent
bundle splits.
Proof. Let L1, L2 be two locally independent line bundles defined on XzXs by translating dz1, dz2
(thanks to flatness and trivial holonomy of X), such that the at most two complex directions of X are
among them. They extend to L1, L2 on XzS by Lemma 3.14, for S Ă Xs the set of complex codimension
2 singularities on X; since X is compact, Lemma 3.13 then extends L1, L2 to X, and we are done.
3.5 Ramified torus over three curves of different complex direction
Let us first prove a technical lemma, using the following well-known fact.
Lemma 3.17. Let L be a line bundle on a complex curve X, with f : O Ñ L be a non-zero section.
Suppose it has zeros p1, . . . , pk with multiplicities n1, . . . , nk. Then c1pLq P H2
DRpXq is Poincaré dual to
the divisor n1p1 ` . . . , nkpk.
Let us call this divisor the zero-divisor of f .
Definition 3.18. Let B be a bundle of rank r on a complex curve X. The slope of B is:
slpBq "
c1pBq.
1
r ż
X
Corollary 3.19. Let L, M be line bundles on a complex curve X. If slpLq ą slpM q, then HompL, M q " 0.
If slpLq " slpM q, then any f P HompL, M q is either zero or an isomorphism.
Proof. Let f P HompL, M q neither zero, nor an isomorphism. It induces a non-zero section f : O Ñ
M b L´1. By Lemma 3.17, if D is the zero-divisor of f ,
so slpM q ď slpLq.
slpM b L´1q " degpDq ď 0,
Lemma 3.20. Let X be a complex curve, B a bundle of rank 2 on X with splittings B " L1 ' L2 "
M1 ' M2. Then there are i, j P t1, 2u such that Li » Mj and Lj » Mi. If L1 fi L2, then one of these
two isomorphisms is an equality, and if moreover c1pL1q " c1pL2q, both isomorphisms are equalities.
Proof. Without loss of generality, slpM1q ě slpL1q ě slpL2q ě slpM2q.
If HompM1, L1q " HompM1, L2q " 0, then HompM1, M1 ' M2q " HompM1, Bq " 0, contradiction!
Hence, by Corollary 3.19, either slpM1q " slpL1q and M1 » L1, or slpM1q " slpL1q " slpL2q and M1 » L2.
In this second case, let us reverse the names of L1, L2, so that M1, L1 are anyway isomorphic.
We can not have HompL1, M2q " HompL2, M2q " 0 either. Hence, either L2 and M2 are isomorphic
(and we are done), or HompL2, M2q " 0 and L1, M1, M2 are isomorphic. In this last case, HompL2, M1q "
HompL2, M2q " 0, so HompL2, Bq " 0, contradiction!
Now let us prove the second statement of Lemma 3.20. We assume slpM1q " slpL1q ě slpL2q " slpM2q
and M1 » L1, M2 » L2. If HompM1, L2q " 0, then the morphism
f : M1 ãÑ M1 ' M2 " L1 ' L2
p
Ñ L2
11
induced by the projection p to L2 parallel to L1 is zero, so M1 " L1 and we are done. Else, slpM1q " slpL2q
and M1, L2 are isomorphic, so L1, L2 are isomorphic.
The third statement of Lemma 3.20 is proven similarly.
Now, we can prove what we want.
Proposition 3.21. Consider X a P K 0 surface which is a ramified cover of a torus over three lines
C1, C2, C3 with no common intersection point and of distinct complex directions, with respective ramifi-
cation orders n1 ě n2 ě n3: π : X Ñ T. Then the cotangent bundle Ω1pXq does not split.
Proof. Assume by contradiction Ω1pXq " M1 ' M2. Let the line bundles L1, L2, L3 be the complex
directions of π´1pC1q, π´1pC2q, π´1pC3q (defined on Ω1pXzXsq).
Let C1
1 Ă X be a parallel to π´1pC1q. By Lemmata 3.14 and 3.13, L2, L3 can be extended to be
. Moreover, since C1
1 gives generic intersection
1 (of degree n3) are not isomorphic. According to Lemma 3.20,
defined globally on an open neighbourhood of C1
has positive intersection with π´1pC2q and π´1pC3q (and a generic choice of C1
points), L2C 1
1 " MiC 1
L2C 1
1 (of degree n2) and L3C 1
1 for some i, say i " 2. Passing to any parallel C1
1, so that Ω1pXqC 1
1, we get
" L2C 1
1
' L3C 1
1
1
1
L2Xzπ´1pC1q " M2Xzπ´1pC1q.
Similarly, L1Xzπ´1pC2q " MjXzπ´1pC2q for some j, and j " 1 since L1, L2 are locally linearly inde-
pendent as subbundles of Ω1pXzXsq.
Hence, the special tensor ω given by the splitting Ω1pXq " M1 ' M2 satisfies:
ωp " αppq
dz1 b dz2 ` dz2 b dz1
dz1 ^ dz2
for all p P zzπ´1pC1 Y C2q and some holomorphic never-vanishing function α on Xzπ´1pC1 Y C2q.
Let us write ω in local coordinates in a neighbourhood Up of a point p P π´1pC3qzπ´1pC1 Y C2q. Let
z1, z be local coordinates in Uz such that L1pUpq " C dz1, L3pUpq " C dz, there is a chart given in
these coordinates by:
φp : pz1, zq P Up ÞÑ pz1, znq P C2,
yielding dz1 " dz1, nzn´1 dz " dz3. Since dz3 spans the complez direction of C3 in T, dz2 " a dz1`b dz3
for some a, b P C. So, for all flat chart neighbourhood V Ă z, it holds in Up X V that
ωq"pz1,zq "
aαpqq
nzn´1
dz1 b dz1
dz1 ^ dz
` bαpqq
dz1 b dz
dz1 ^ dz
,
which is not bounded when z tends to zero, whereas ω should also be defined at p " p0, 0q, contradiction.
Acknowledgements
We are very grateful to Misha Verbitsky for proposing us this nice question, for explaining us so many
mathematics on and around the subject of P K manifolds and complex manifolds more generally, giving
references as well as patiently exposing arguments that were not to be found in the literature.
References
[1] Arnaud Beauville. Complex manifolds with split tangent bundle. ArXiv Mathematics e-prints, sep
1998.
[2] Dmitri Burago, Yuri Burago, and Sergei Ivanov. A Course in Metric Geometry, volume 33 of Graduate
Studies in Mathematics. AMS, 2001.
12
[3] Fabrizio Catanese and Marco Franciosi. On varieties whose universal cover is a product of curves.
ArXiv Mathematics e-prints, dec 2008.
[4] Dmitri Panov. Polyhedral Kähler manifolds. Geometry and Topology, 13:2205–2252, 2009.
[5] Anton Zorich. Flat surfaces. In Frontiers in Number Theory, Physics and Geometry I, pages 439–586.
Springer-Verlag, 2006.
13
|
1108.2026 | 1 | 1108 | 2011-08-09T19:52:14 | Derived equivalence and birationality | [
"math.AG"
] | A different proof to a known criterion of derived equivalence implying birationality is given. Derived equivalent smooth projective curves over an algebraically closed field are proved to be isomorphic. A different proof of derived equivalence implying birationality for varieties of general type (originally due to Kawamata) is given. | math.AG | math |
Derived equivalence and birationality
Y a i
1 Introduction
1.1
Introduction
(1.1.1) Tw h je
ive vaieie ae
a ed deived e iva e D e iva e if hei
b ded deived
aegie f
hee heave ae exa
e iva e. awaaa f aed
je
e e aig D e iva e
e wih e iva e
e [aw02℄. Se aia awe hee
je
e have bee kw; ee [ y06 Se
i 6.4℄ ad [aw10℄.
f w vaieie ae e iva e he hey ae biaia ad hee ae exa e f D
e iva e vaieie whi
h ae biaia : we kw ag he eha abe ia
vaieie ad hei d a f diei a ea w.
hi ae we ve a AE
ie
dii 2.1.2.1 whe D e iva e
e de i y biaia iy.
The f 2.1.2.2 i whi
h we wi a y he
iei wa a eady kw a he a h
di
veed afe havig wie he ae. The igh hif f ehai f geey
e f
wi be j i(cid:12)ed y i f e wk.
(1.1.2) Si
e biaia iy i e iva e ihy f h je
ive
ve we e
hi biaia
iei i 3.1.1.1 hw ha ve a a gbai
a y
ed (cid:12)e d f ay
haa
eii
D e iva e
ve ae ihi
. The
ae whe he
ve ge i ze
a ea 2
a be ed
ed a e geea e d e Bda v [B01 Thee
2.5℄ ab vaieie wih a e ai
ai
a b d e; aa
h give a a f f
igh y di(cid:11)ee (cid:13)av f hee
ae.
1
The ieeig
ae i f e ii
ve. The f eeed i hi ae ha he
advaage f beig a gebai
ad de e he
ex gy. i eha a
e
i ii he (cid:12) kw exa e f D e iva e vaieie: They h d be
ideed a
d i a
e f ea
h he b f a e ii
ve a he \ieeig" d i a
e ae
eeia y ihi
he
ve ie f; [Ai57 Thee 7℄ ad [T 93 Thee 1℄.
(1.1.3) awaaa hwed [aw02 Thee 2.3℄ ha f h je
ive vaieie f ax
ia daia dieia D e iva e
e i ie e iva e
e.
ai
a i hi
ae
D e iva e
e i ie biaia iy.
3.2.1.2 we ve hi a i i
ai a ahe
a i
ai. aa
h i eieve ifai he aia a a
iaed he
iea ye f i
ai
a f h gh he See f
he deived
aegie.
(1.1.4) ai. F ay vaiey we dee by T
X
af
:= DX
he iag aed
aegy
f efe
exe. Whe X i h T
i ihi
he deived
aegy D
X f
b
hee heave X . f k i a (cid:12)e d we have T
= D
Ve
.
k
k
X
b
A f
ideed i hi ae ae deived ad f exa e we dee he deived
ba
k Rf
e. deived h fwad Rf
f a hi f i y by f
e. f
.
he
ae whe a k iea iag aed
aegy T i (cid:12)ie f ay ai f b je
a; b 2 T we dee by
a; b he b je
a; b[j ℄[ j ℄ i T
. The (cid:12)ie
j
T
k
(cid:15)
dii i ai(cid:12)ed f exa e whe k i a (cid:12)e d ad T = T
whee X i a h
X
je
ive vaiey ve k.
2 A criterion for birationality
2.1 Varieties sharing a point
(2.1.1) e X be a vaiey ve a (cid:12)e d k; dee by (cid:25) he
a hi X ! Se
k.
We wi eed he f wig
(2.1.1.1) Lemma
f i a bje
i T
h ha he f
T
! T
de(cid:12)ed by
X
X
k
a 7! (cid:25)
a (cid:10) i a e f
he i ed a a
ed k i x X .
2
f. By [i 11 Thee 3.3.4.1℄ he e f
a 7! (cid:25)
a (cid:10) i ihi
a 7! x
a f e
ed k i x 2 X ; i
e x
kx i ze he
ae f a = kx
i ie ha x ie i he
h gy f .
S e hee i ahe
ed k i y 6= x i he we have x
ky = 0. he
he had (cid:25)
ky(cid:10)
(cid:25)
y
y
i ze i
e y
i ze ad (cid:25)
y
: T
! T
=
k
ky
(cid:24)
i a e iva e
e. Thi i a
adi
i ad we have = fxg.
(2.1.2) e X ad Y be w h je
ive vaieie ve a (cid:12)e d k.
(2.1.2.1) Theorem S e : T
X
! T
i a exa
e iva e
e ad F : T
! T
ad
Y
X
k
G : T
! T
ae e f
h ha he f wig diaga i
aive
Y
k
f
ihi:
T
T
X
!CCCCCCCC
F
Y
}{{{{{{{{
G
T
:
k
The X ad Y ae biaia .
f. Agai by [i 11 Thee 3.3.4.1℄ we ay e a
e F wih x
ad G wih y
whee
x 2 X ad y 2 Y ae
ed k i. By [ 03 Thee 3.2.2℄ he e iva e
e i
ihi
he F ie kai afai
f e b je
E 2 T
; e E
be he
E
XY
y
ei
i f E X fyg ! X Y . w we have he f wig diaga:
X Y
X fyg
(cid:25)
X
{xxxxxxxxx
(cid:25)
Y
(cid:25)
X
Y
y :
Cide he f
y
AE
whi
h by [B95 ea 1.3℄ i ihi
he F ie kai
E
afai
: a 7! (cid:25)
a (cid:10) E
. By a i hi i ihi
he e f
E
y
y
a 7! x
a ad by 2.1.1.1 we have E
= fxg X fyg
X . By [Th97 ea
y
=
(cid:24)
3.3b℄ we he have E \ X fyg = E
= fxg.
y
w he je
i E ! Y i je
ive wih
e
ed (cid:12)be [ y06 ea 6.4
ad ea 6.11℄ whe diei ae e ei
i . e
e hee i a e
eighb hd V f y i Y ve whi
h he hi E ! Y i a hehi.
ai
a he f
= (cid:25)
E
ai V ; i (cid:12)be a y i ihi
ky.
X
Y
Theefe by hikig V if e
eay we have
j
.
X
V
V
=
(cid:24)
3
/
/
!
}
{
o
o
o
o
w
ide he f wig
aive diaga:
T
T
T
X
Y
V
j
V
x
y
0
y
T
= kex
T
= key
T
= key
X
Y
V
(cid:22)
%KKKKKKKKKK
(cid:22)x
yssssssssss
(cid:22)y
f :f :
T
;
k
whee
i he id
ed exa
e iva e
e ad he aw aked wih \f.f." i f y faihf .
(cid:22)
We he have
=
whe iage i T
= key
i he i b je
.
x
X
y
X
V
V
y
(cid:22)
0
ai
a de he
ii
T
= kex
! T
= key
! T
= key
X
Y
V
he i b je
i e he i b je
. Thi
ii i f y faihf
x
X
V
y
0
ad we have a ihi
Ed
Ed
:
=
T
= kex
T
= key
x
X
V
X
V
y
(cid:24)
0
B by [i 11 Thee 3.3.4.1 ad ii 2.3.3.1℄ hee w ae ihi
ee
ive y he
a ig
ad
ad X ad Y ae biaia .
X;x
V ;y
Y ;y
=
(cid:24)
(2.1.2.2) Corollary [B01 ea 2.5℄ e X ad Y be h je
ive vaieie ve
a (cid:12)e d k; e x 2 X ad y 2 Y be
ed k i. S e : T
! T
i a exa
X
Y
e iva e
e edig kx a hif f ky he X ad Y ae biaia .
f. By e ad
ii wih he hif f
T
ad T
we ay a e
X
Y
ha ed kx[ diX ℄ ky[ diY ℄. Dee by F : T
! T
he f
X
k
(cid:15)
eeeed by kx[ diX ℄ i he ee ha F a :=
kx[ diX ℄; a f evey
a 2 T
. Sii a y e G be eeeed by ky[ diY ℄ he we have F
G AE .
=
X
(cid:24)
B he we ae i he i ai f 2.1.2.1 i
e hee f
ae ihi
he e
f
x
ad y
by Ghedie
k Vedie d a iy [ y06 C ay 3.35℄: F ay a 2 T
X
we have
(cid:15)
(cid:15)
(cid:15)
(cid:24)
(cid:24)
kx[ diX ℄; a =
x
k; a[diX ℄
k; x
a
x
a 2 T
:
=
=
k
T
X
T
X
T
k
(2.1.2.3) Corollary e X ad Y be h je
ive vaieie ve a (cid:12)e d k; e y 2 Y be
a
ed k i. S e : T
! T
i a exa
e iva e
e edig a bje
v
X
Y
4
/
/
/
/
/
/
%
y
/
/
a hif f ky. f he
h gy v i ze dieia he X ad Y
ae biaia .
f. S e v
ky[℄ he we have
=
(cid:24)
v ; v
ky; ky
k:
=
=
(cid:24)
(cid:24)
eve
v ; v [i℄
ky; ky[i℄ = 0
=
(cid:24)
f a i < 0. See f exa e [ y06 ii 11.8℄.
Th he
dii f [ y06 ea 4.5℄ ae ai(cid:12)ed ad we
de ha v i ihi
a hif f kx f e
ed k i x 2 X ad we ae i he i ai f 2.1.2.2.
3 Applications
3.1 Smooth projective curves with equivalent derived categories
(3.1.1) We
ide he f wig
(3.1.1.1) Theorem e k be a a gebai
a y
ed (cid:12)e d. f C
ad C
ae w h
1
2
je
ive
ve adiig a exa
e iva e
e : T
! T
he C
ad C
ae
C
C
1
2
1
2
ihi
.
fa
whe he ge g f C
i eihe ze a ea w he e h d ve ay (cid:12)e d
1
d e he e geea e [B01 Thee 2.5℄; ee a [i 11 Thee 4.2.1.1℄ f
a ewha di(cid:11)ee f. 3.1.5 be w we ke
h a ideede f i he
ae f
ve.
We ae h ed
ed he e
ia
ae:
(3.1.1.2) Proposition e k be a a gebai
a y
ed (cid:12)e d. f E
ad E
ae w h
1
2
je
ive
ve f ge e adiig a exa
e iva e
e : T
! T
he E
E
E
1
1
2
ad E
ae ihi
.
2
5
The
ae whe k = C
a be ved by aig ig a
h gy [ y06 C ay
5.46℄ b hi f de ee ivia y geea ize he (cid:12)e d.
ay be a
ieeig ei ak whehe 3.1.1.2 i h d ve (cid:12)e d whi
h ae e
eai y
a gebai
a y
ed.
The e f hi e
i ex
e f 3.1.5 i deved givig he f f 3.1.1.2 ad we
wk de i ai ad a i.
(3.1.2) e v be a b je
i T
E
1
h ha v
ky[ 1℄ f a
ed k i y 2 E
.
=
2
(cid:24)
Re
a ha ky[ 1℄ eee he f
y
: T
! T
; ee he f f 2.1.2.2. e
E
2
ky
F : T
! T
be he exa
f
eeeed by v :
E
k
1
f evey b 2 T
. The f ay b 2 T
we have
E
1
E
1
F b :=
v ; b 2 T
k
T
E
1
(cid:15)
F b :=
v ; b
v; b = y
b:
=
(cid:15)
(cid:15)
(cid:24)
T
T
E
E
1
2
e
e we have a
aive diaga
T
T
E
2
E
1
!CCCCCCCC
F
T
:
k
}{{{{{{{{
y
(3.1.2.1) Proposition Wih ai a abve we have:
a v ; v = k.
b The bje
v i ihi
eihe a hif f kx f e i x 2 E
a
1
hif f a ve
b d e E
.
1
f. a f w f he fa
ha v ; v
ky; ky
k i
e v 7! ky[ 1℄
=
=
(cid:24)
(cid:24)
de he e iva e
e .
b By [ y06 C ay 3.15℄ ay b je
i T
i ihi
a die
f hif f
E
1
hee heave E
. By a a hee be y e ad he
e i he hif
1
f a
hee heaf. Si
e ay
hee heaf a h
ve i a he die
f i
i bheaf wih a
a y fee heaf we ee ha v i he hif f eihe a i heaf
ed a a
ed k i a ve
b d e. he i
ae i a be ed
ed
i
e hewie v ; v w d have diei geae ha e.
6
/
/
!
}
(3.1.3) The f f 3.1.1.2 wi
eed by id
i he ak f he hif f he
hee heaf v ; by hi we ea he ak f he i e ihi
hee heaf
ihi
v i T
. The bae
ae ae he f wig:
E
1
(3.1.3.1) Lemma f he ak f v i 0 1 he E
ad E
ae ihi
.
1
2
f. By 3.1.2.1 if v i i he i i a hif f kx. The E
ad E
ae biaia
1
2
by 2.1.2.2 he
e ihi
i
e hey ae a ed be bh h.
he he had a e ha v i a hif f a ie b d e he v
[℄ f e 2 Z
=
(cid:24)
ad ie b d e E
. Fix a
ed k i z 2 E
ide exa
e iva e
e
1
1
whee i he i
a(cid:19)e ie b d e i
E
E
ad E =
degz [℄
1
1
E
1
E
E
; hee : E
! E
E
dee he diaga hi.
1
1
1
1
1
E
T
0
! T
! T
;
i
E
1
E
E
1
1
0
Wih
hi
e f F ie kai kee E we have a ie b d e f degee ze E
h
1
ha
= v ; eve hee i a
ed k i 2 i
E
h ha
k = .
E
1
0
e
e he
ii AE
AE
i a exa
e iva e
e edig kx ky[ 1℄ ad we
E
ae i he i ai eaed abve:
T
0
/
E /
/
T
T
T
i
E
E
E
E
1
1
1
2
)SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
T
:
k
e
e we have E
i
E
E
by 2.1.2.2.
2
1
1
=
=
(cid:24)
(cid:24)
0
}{{{{{{{{
y
(3.1.4) The f f 3.1.1.2 i w ed
ed he f wig
(3.1.4.1) Lemma Wih ai ad a i a i 3.1.1.2 if v i f ak a ea
w he hee exi ahe exa
e iva e
e
: T
! T
ad bje
v
2 T
h
E
E
1
2
E
1
0
0
ha
v
ky[ 1℄ ad akv
< akv.
=
0
0
0
(cid:24)
f. e = akv (cid:21) 2. By eig wih a iab e ie b d e E
we
a wie
1
(cid:24)
v
(cid:10) B [℄; whee 2 Z i a ie b d e ad B a ide
ab e ve
b d e f
=
ak ad degee d
aifyig 0 (cid:20) d
< .
B
B
We
ai ha d
a be ze: deed by [Ai57 Thee 5 ii℄ evey ide
ab e
B
ve
b d e f degee ze ad ak E
i f he f (cid:10) F
whee i a ie
1
7
/
)
/
/
}
b d e f degee ze ad F
i he e
ia ve
b d e f degee ze ad ak ; ee
[Ai57 Thee 5 i℄. e
e if d
= 0 he we have
B
v ; v
(cid:10) (cid:10) F
[℄; (cid:10) (cid:10) F
[℄
F
; F
k
=
=
=
(cid:24)
(cid:24)
(cid:24)
by [Ai57 C ay 1 h 5 ad ea 17℄. Thi
adi
3.1.2.1 a a i
e
(cid:21) 2.
w
ide he i
a(cid:19)e ie b d e i
E
E
; dee by (cid:25)
he je
i
1
1
i
0
he i h fa
. e be he b je
(cid:10) (cid:25)
[ ℄ i T
. The we have a exa
0
2
i
E
E
1
1
1
e iva e
e
T
0
T
;
i
E
1
E
1
whi
h ed he b je
v
(cid:10) B [℄ (cid:25)
(cid:10) (cid:25)
B i T
0
.
=
1
2
i
E
1
(cid:24)
We
ide he ve
b d e (cid:10) (cid:25)
B a a fai y f ve
b d e E
aaeized
2
1
0
by i
E
. fa
i i he fai y f ve
b d e f ak ad degee d
E
wih
1
B
1
\ eve =h
e" whee h = g
d; d
; ee [Ai57 Thee 10℄.
B
Re
a ha we have 0 < d
< ad by [Ai57 ea 15℄ ad he Riea R
h hee
B
[Ai57 ea 8℄ we have f evey ie b d e f degee ze:
i
(cid:10) B
(cid:24)
=
d
B
k
if i = 0
0
if i 6= 0.
e
e by he eay e
a e e
e [ y06 3.4℄ we ee ha v
:= (cid:25)
(cid:10) (cid:25)
B i a
1
2
0
ve
b d e i
E
f ak d
< ad we
a i y ake
be he
ii
1
B
0
0
f a ai ivee f
f wed by :
T
0
T
T
i
E
E
E
1
1
2
(cid:24)
(cid:24)
=
=
deifyig i
E
wih E
he
de he f f he ea ad wih i he f f
1
1
0
3.1.1.2.
(3.1.5) Reak. The ae idea abve ay i fa
be ed give a f f 3.1.1.1 i
he
ae whe he ge g f C
i e a e. ee we give a ke
h: S e Y i a
1
h je
ive vaiey ad C i a h je
ive
ve adiig a exa
e iva e
e
: T
! T
:
C
Y
e y 2 Y be a
ed k i. Dee by v 2 T
he hif f a i e
hee heaf
h
C
ha v
ky[ diY ℄. Si
e See f
e wih exa
e iva e
e we have
=
(cid:24)
a
aive diaga
8
/
/
o
o
/
T
T
C
Y
(cid:10)
[1℄
(cid:10)
[diY ℄
C
Y
/
T
T
:
C
Y
A yig he f
i hi diaga he b je
v give
v
_
ky[ diY ℄
_
v (cid:10)
[1℄
ky:
C
B hi i ie ha v [diY ℄ ad v (cid:10)
[1℄ ae e ihi
b je
de he
C
e iva e
e ad hi i ib e y if hee w b je
ae ihi
; i ai
a we
have diY = 1. F hi we ee ha we have v
v (cid:10)
f a 2 Z b hi
(cid:24)
(cid:10)
=
C
(cid:24)
i ib e y if eihe v i i i whi
h
ae we
de C
Y by 2.1.2.2
=
C
ad
ae bh a e i whi
h
ae C i f ge e.
C
3.2 Varieties of maximal Kodaira dimension
(3.2.1) Cide he f wig
(3.2.1.1) Theorem [aw02 Thee 2.3 2℄ e X ad Y be h je
ive vaieie
ve a (cid:12)e d k adiig a exa
e iva e
e : T
! T
. S e ha he daia
X
Y
diei f X i e a diX he X ad Y ae e iva e.
ee by e iva e
e we ea hee i ahe je
ive h vaiey Z wih biaia
a f : Z ! X ad g : Z ! Y ha f
g
Z .
ee
ea a he
X
Y
=
(cid:24)
e ad a ieeig ei hw iee e iva e
e i e f he deived
aegie.
(3.2.1.2) Corollary e X ad Y be h je
ive vaieie ve a (cid:12)e d k adiig
a exa
e iva e
e : T
! T
. S e ha he daia diei f X i e a
X
Y
diX he X ad Y ae biaia .
he eaiig aagah f hi e
i we give a di(cid:11)ee f f 3.2.1.2 ad we
wk de i ai ad a i. A aa g ag e wk if we e a
e he
daia diei f X i he aee wih he daia diei f he ai
ai
a
b d e
.
X
9
/
/
/
/
/
/
(3.2.2) e y 2 Y be a
ed k i ad v
y
2 T
be a b je
h ha v
X
y
(cid:24)
=
ky[ diY ℄. The a i 3.1.2.1 we kw ha v
; v
k. By [ y06 ea
y
y
=
(cid:24)
3.9℄ we kw ha he
h gy Z
:= v
i
e
ed.
y
y
(3.2.2.1) Lemma F evey i x 2 X hee i a i y 2 Y
h ha x ie iZ
.
y
f. By [ y06 ii 3.17℄ we kw ha fky[ diY ℄g wih y vayig f
a aig
a f T
. Si
e i a e iva e
e we ee ha fv
g f a aig
a
Y
y
f T
. ai
a f ay x we
a (cid:12)d a y ha
X
(cid:15)
(cid:24)
x
v
kx[ diX ℄; v
6= 0 2 T
:
=
y
y
kx
(3.2.3) By 2.1.2.3 he f f 3.2.1.2 i ed
ed he f wig
(3.2.3.1) Proposition f he daia diei f X i e a diX he hee i a
i y 2 Y wih diZ
= 0.
y
Fi we eed a i e
(3.2.3.2) Lemma e Z be a h je
ive vaiey ve a (cid:12)e d k a ie b d e
Z ad G a
hee heaf wih G = Z
h ha G
G (cid:10) . The i i
=
(cid:24)
i i
Z ; ha i
f e 2 .
Z
=
(cid:24)
(cid:10)
f. We ay e a
e G i he aee wih a e(cid:13)exive heaf [ a80 C ay 1.4℄:
deed G
i e(cid:13)exive ad i eai y ee aify G
G
(cid:10) . S f w we
=
_ _
_ _
_ _
(cid:24)
a e G i e(cid:13)exive.
The hee i a
ed be Z
(cid:26) Z f
diei a ea w
h ha he ei
i f
0
G i
ee U := Z Z
i a ve
b d e f iive ak . By akig he h
0
wedge we f G j
G (cid:10) j
we ge
U
U
=
(cid:24)
^
^
(cid:24)
(cid:10)
G j
G j
(cid:10) j
:
=
U
U
U
V
(cid:10)
Si
e
G j
i a ie b d e U hi i ie ha j
i he ivia ie b d e U
U
U
whi
h i i ie ha
i he ivia ie b d e Z i
e Z
ha
diei a
(cid:10)
0
ea w.
10
f f 3.2.3.1. S e he
ay ha f evey y we have diZ
> 0. Cide
y
he f wig
aive diaga
/
T
T
X
Y
(cid:10)
[diX ℄
(cid:10)
[diY ℄
X
Y
/
T
T
;
X
Y
whee he vei
a aw ae See f
. A yig he f
i hi diaga he
b je
v
give
y
v
y
_
ky[ diY ℄
_
v
(cid:10)
y
X
[diX ℄
ky:
The v
[diY ℄ ad v (cid:10)
[diX ℄ ae e ihi
b je
i T
de he e iv
y
X
Y
a e
e he
e hee w b je
ae ihi
i T
. eig d = diX diY we
X
he have
(cid:24)
(cid:24)
(cid:24)
(cid:24)
(cid:24)
(cid:10)2
(cid:10)
v
v
(cid:10)
[d℄
v
(cid:10)
[2d℄
v
(cid:10)
[d℄
=
=
=
=
=
y
y
X
y
y
X
X
f a 2 Z. Thi i ai
a i ie he we kw fa
ha d = 0 [ y06 ii
4.1℄ ad we have v
v
(cid:10)
f evey 2 Z.
y
y
=
X
(cid:24)
(cid:10)
Fix ay
ed k i x X ad y Y ha x 2 Z
a i 3.2.2.1. e h : Z ! Z
be a
y
y
a hi f a iive dieia h vaiey Z whe iage
ai
x; f exa e we
a
he ay je
ive
ve
aied i Z
aig h gh x he
y
ake Z be i a izai. Thi
a be de i
e Z
i
e
ed ad a ed be
y
f iive diei.
The ihi v
v
(cid:10)
he give h
v
h
v
(cid:10) h
Z . Si
e
=
=
y
y
y
y
X
X
(cid:24)
(cid:24)
(cid:10)
(cid:10)
(cid:10)
h
i
a y fee Z hi i ie
X
i
i
(cid:10)
(cid:24)
h
v
h
v
(cid:10) h
;
y
y
=
X
f evey i; hee
dee he i h
h gy heaf.
i
Si
e he iage f h i
aied i he f v
we have
h
v
= Z f e
y
y
i
i. Theefe he
dii f 3.2.3.2 ae ai(cid:12)ed wih G =
h
v
ad = h
y
X
i
(cid:10)
ad we
de ha h
i a i e ee i i
Z f evey .
X
(cid:10)
B hi i ie ha evey geea x i
aied i a iive dieia (cid:12)be f he
aia a (cid:30)
(cid:10)
a
iaed
i
e hZ i aed a i. Theefe he
(cid:10)
X
X
daia diei f X
a be e a diX .
11
/
/
/
/
/
/
(3.2.4) Reak. Dee by (cid:20)X; he iaka daia diei f a ie b d e a
h je
ive vaiey X . The he f f 3.2.3.1 hw ha if v 2 T
i a b je
X
ha i e a hif f ky de a exa
e iva e
e : T
! T
he he f
X
Y
v i
a
ed by he aia a (cid:30)
a
iaed he iea ye j
j. F
X
X
hi we have
References
diX (cid:20)X;
(cid:21) di v:
X
[Ai57℄ . F. Aiyah Ve
b d e ve a e ii
ve
. d ah. S
. 3
7 1957 414{452.
[B01℄ T Bidge ad ad Ay a
i
ia C ex fa
e wih e iva e deived
aegie ah. Z. 236 2001 . 4 677{697.
[B95℄ A. . Bda ad D. . v Seihga de
ii f a gebai
vai
eie aXiv:a g ge/9506012v1 1995.
[B01℄ A exei Bda ad Dii v Re
i f a vaiey f he deived
aegy ad g f a e iva e
e Cii ah. 125 2001 . 3
327{344.
[ a80℄ Rbi ahe Sab e e(cid:13)exive heave ah. A. 254 1980 . 2 121{176.
[ y06℄ D. ybe
h F ie kai af i a gebai
geey xfd ahe
ai
a gah The C aed e xfd Uiveiy e xfd 2006.
[aw02℄ Y ji awaaa D e iva e
e ad e iva e
e . Di(cid:11)eeia Ge. 61
2002 . 1 147{171. R 1949787 2004:14025
[aw10℄
Deived
aegie ad iia de S gak Exii 23 2010
. 2 235{259 S gak Exii.
[i 11℄ Y a i
F
iag aed
e
aegie
ei
aXiv:1105.2197v1 2011.
[ 03℄ D. . v Deived
aegie f
hee heave ad e iva e
e bewee
he Uekhi a. a k 58 2003 . 3351 89{172.
[Th97℄ R. W. Tha The
ai(cid:12)
ai f iag aed b
aegie Cii
ah. 105 1997 . 1 1{27.
[T 93℄
ig W. T Seiab e b d e ve a e ii
ve Adv. ah. 98 1993
. 1 1{26.
12
|
1708.05382 | 6 | 1708 | 2019-03-13T20:50:28 | Schur-finiteness (and Bass-finiteness) conjecture for quadric fibrations and for families of sextic du Val del Pezzo surfaces | [
"math.AG",
"math.AT",
"math.KT",
"math.RT"
] | Let Q -> B be a quadric fibration and T -> B a family of sextic du Val del Pezzo surfaces. Making use of the recent theory of noncommutative mixed motives, we establish a precise relation between the Schur-finiteness conjecture for Q, resp. for T, and the Schur-finiteness conjecture for B. As an application, we prove the Schur-finiteness conjecture for Q, resp. for T, when B is low-dimensional. Along the way, we obtain a proof of the Schur-finiteness conjecture for smooth complete intersections of two or three quadric hypersurfaces. Finally, we prove similar results for the Bass-finiteness conjecture. | math.AG | math |
SCHUR-FINITENESS (AND BASS-FINITENESS) CONJECTURE
FOR QUADRIC FIBRATIONS AND
FOR FAMILIES OF SEXTIC DU VAL DEL PEZZO SURFACES
GONC¸ ALO TABUADA
Abstract. Let Q → B be a quadric fibration and T → B a family of sextic
du Val del Pezzo surfaces. Making use of the recent theory of noncommutative
mixed motives, we establish a precise relation between the Schur-finiteness
conjecture for Q, resp. for T , and the Schur-finiteness conjecture for B. As an
application, we prove the Schur-finiteness conjecture for Q, resp. for T , when
B is low-dimensional. Along the way, we obtain a proof of the Schur-finiteness
conjecture for smooth complete intersections of two or three quadric hypersur-
faces. Finally, we prove similar results for the Bass-finiteness conjecture.
1. Introduction
Schur-finiteness conjecture. Let C be a Q-linear, idempotent complete, sym-
metric monoidal category. Given a partition λ of an integer n ≥ 1, consider the
corresponding Q-linear representation Vλ of the symmetric group Sn and the asso-
ciated idempotent eλ ∈ Q[Sn]. Under these notations, the Schur-functor Sλ : C → C
sends an object a ∈ C to the direct summand of a⊗n determined by eλ. Following
Deligne [9, §1], a ∈ C is called Schur-finite if it is annihilated by some Schur-functor.
Voevodsky introduced in [37] a triangulated category of geometric mixed motives
DMgm(k)Q (over a perfect base field k). By construction, this category is Q-linear,
idempotent complete, symmetric monoidal, and comes equipped with a ⊗-functor
M (−)Q : Sm(k) → DMgm(k)Q defined on smooth k-schemes of finite type. Given
X ∈ Sm(k), an important conjecture in the theory of motives is the following:
Conjecture S(X): The geometric mixed motive M (X)Q is Schur-finite.
Thanks to the (independent) work of Guletskii [10] and Mazza [26], the conjec-
ture S(X) holds in the case where dim(X) ≤ 1. Thanks to the work of Kimura
[19] and Shermenev [29], the conjecture S(X) also holds in the case where X is
an abelian variety. Besides these cases (and some other cases scattered in the
literature), the Schur-finiteness conjecture remains wide open.
The main goal of this note is to prove the Schur-finiteness conjecture in the new
cases of quadric fibrations and families of sextic du Val del Pezzo surfaces.
Quadric fibrations. Our first main result is the following:
Theorem 1.1. Let q : Q → B a flat quadric fibration of relative dimension d − 2.
Assume that B and Q are k-smooth, that all the fibers of q have corank ≤ 1, and
Date: March 15, 2019.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 14A20, 14A22, 14C15, 14D06, 16H05, 19E08.
The author was supported by a NSF CAREER Award.
1
2
GONC¸ ALO TABUADA
that the locus D ⊂ B of the critical values of the fibration q is k-smooth. Under
these assumptions, the following holds:
(i) When d is even, we have S(Q) ⇔ S(B) + S( eB), where eB stands for the dis-
(ii) When d is odd and char(k) 6= 2, we have {S(Vi)} + {S( eDi)} ⇒ S(Q), where Vi
criminant 2-fold cover of B (ramified over D).
is any affine open of B and eDi is any Galois 2-fold cover of Di := D ∩ Vi.
To the best of the author's knowledge, Theorem 1.1 is new in the literature.
Intuitively speaking, it relates the Schur-finiteness conjecture for the total space Q
with the Schur-finiteness conjecture for certain coverings/subschemes of the base
B. Among other ingredients, its proof makes use of Kontsevich's noncommutative
mixed motives of twisted root stacks; consult §3-4 below for details.
Making use of Theorem 1.1, we are now able to prove the Schur-finiteness con-
jecture in new cases. Here are two low-dimensional examples:
Corollary 1.2 (Quadric fibrations over curves). Let q : Q → B be a quadric fibra-
tion as in Theorem 1.1 with B a curve1. In this case, the conjecture S(Q) holds.
Corollary 1.3 (Quadric fibrations over surfaces). Let q : Q → B be a quadric
fibration as in Theorem 1.1 with B a surface and d odd. In this case, S(B) ⇒ S(Q).
Proof. Given a smooth k-surface X, we have S(X) ⇔ S(U ) for any open U of X.
Therefore, thanks to Theorem 1.1(ii), the proof follows from the fact that when B
is a surface, the conjectures {S(Vi)} can be replaced by the conjecture S(B).
(cid:3)
Corollary 1.3 can be applied, for example, to the case where B is (an open
subscheme of) an abelian surface or a smooth projective surface with pg = 0 which
satisfies Bloch's conjecture (see Guletskii-Pedrini [11, §4 Thm. 7]). Recall that
Bloch's conjecture holds for surfaces not of general type (see Bloch-Kas-Leiberman
[4]), for surfaces which are rationally dominated by a product of curves (see Kimura
[19]), for Godeaux, Catanese and Barlow surfaces (see Voisin [38, 39]), etc.
Remark 1.4 (Related work). Let q : Q → B be a quadric fibration as in Theorem 1.1.
In the particular case where Q and B are smooth projective, Bouali [7] and Vial [36,
§4] "computed" the Chow motive h(Q)Q of Q using smooth projective k-schemes
of dimension ≤ dim(B). Since the category of Chow motives (with Q-coefficients)
embeds fully-faithfully into DMgm(k)Q (see [37, §4]), these computations lead to
an alternative "geometric" proof of Corollaries 1.2-1.3. Note that in Theorem 1.1
and in Corollaries 1.2-1.3 we do not assume that Q and B are projective; we are
(mainly) interested in geometric mixed motives and not in pure motives.
Intersections of quadrics. Let Y ⊂ Pd−1 be a smooth complete intersection of m
quadric hypersurfaces. The linear span of these quadrics gives rise to a flat quadric
fibration q : Q → Pm−1 of relative dimension d − 2, with Q k-smooth. Under these
notations, our second main result is the following:
Theorem 1.5. We have S(Q) ⇒ S(Y ). When 2m ≤ d, the converse also holds.
By combining Theorem 1.5 with the above Corollaries 1.2-1.3, we hence obtain
a proof of the Schur-finiteness conjecture in the following cases:
1Since B is a curve, the locus D ⊂ B of the critical values of q is necessarily k-smooth.
SCHUR-FINITENESS (AND BASS-FINITENESS) CONJECTURE
3
Corollary 1.6 (Intersections of two or three quadrics). Assume that q : Q → Pm−1
is as in Theorem 1.1. In this case, the conjecture S(Y ) holds when Y is a smooth
complete intersection of two, or of three odd-dimensional, quadric hypersurfaces.
Families of sextic du Val del Pezzo surfaces. Recall that a sextic du Val
del Pezzo surface X is a projective k-scheme with at worst du Val singularities
and ample anticanonical class such that K 2
X = 6. Consider a family of sextic
du Val del Pezzo surfaces f : T → B, i.e. a flat morphism f such that for every
geometric point x ∈ B the associated fiber Tx is a sextic du Val del Pezzo surface.
Following Kuznetsov [24, §5], given d ∈ {2, 3}, let us write Md for the relative
moduli stack of semistable sheaves on fibers of T over B with Hilbert polynomial
hd(t) := (3t+ d)(t+ 1), and Zd for the coarse moduli space of Md. By construction,
we have finite flat morphisms Z2 → B and Z3 → B of degrees 3 and 2, respectively.
Under these notations, our third main result is the following:
Theorem 1.7. Let f : T → B be a family of sextic du Val del Pezzo surfaces.
Assume that char(k) 6∈ {2, 3} and that T is k-smooth. Under these assumptions,
we have the equivalence of conjectures S(T ) ⇔ S(B) + S(Z2) + S(Z3).
To the best of the author's knowledge, Theorem 1.7 is new in the literature. It
leads to a proof of the Schur-finiteness conjecture in new cases. Here is an example:
Corollary 1.8 (Families of sextic du Val del Pezzo surfaces over curves). Let
f : T → B be a family of sextic du Val del Pezzo surfaces as in Theorem 1.7 with
B a curve. In this case, the conjecture S(T ) holds.
Remark 1.9. Let f : T → B be a family of sextic du Val del Pezzo surfaces as
in Theorem 1.7. To the best of the author's knowledge, the associated geometric
mixed motive M (T )Q has not been "computed" (in any non-trivial particular case).
Nevertheless, consult Helmsauer [14] for the "computation" of the Chow motive
h(X)Q of certain smooth (projective) del Pezzo surfaces X.
Bass-finiteness conjecture. Let k be a finite base field and X a smooth k-scheme
of finite type. The Bass-finiteness conjecture B(X) (see [3, §9]) is one of the oldest
and most important conjectures in algebraic K-theory. It asserts that the algebraic
K-theory groups Kn(X), n ≥ 0, are finitely generated. In the same vein, given an
integer r ≥ 2, we can consider the conjecture B(X)1/r, where Kn(X) is replaced
by Kn(X)1/r := Kn(X) ⊗ Z[1/r]. Our fourth main result is the following:
Theorem 1.10. The following holds:
(i) Theorem 1.1 and Corollaries 1.2-1.3 hold2 similarly for the conjecture B(−)1/2.
In Corollary 1.2, the groups Kn(Q)1/2, n ≥ 2, are moreover finite.
(ii) Theorem 1.5 holds similarly for the conjecture B(−).
(iii) Corollary 1.6 holds similarly for the conjecture B(−)1/2. In the case where
Y is a smooth complete intersection of two quadric hypersurfaces, the groups
Kn(Y )1/2, n ≥ 2, are moreover finite.
(iv) Theorem 1.7 and Corollary 1.8 hold similarly for the conjecture B(−)1/6. In
Corollary 1.8, the groups Kn(T )1/6, n ≥ 2, are moreover finite.
2Corollary 1.3 (for the conjecture B(−)1/2) can also be applied to the case where B is (an
open subscheme of) an abelian surface; see [17, Cor. 70 and Thm. 82].
4
GONC¸ ALO TABUADA
2. Preliminaries
In what follows, all schemes/stacks are of finite type over the perfect base field k.
Dg categories. For a survey on dg categories we invite the reader to consult [18].
In what follows, we will write dgcat(k) for the category of (essentially small) dg cat-
egories and dg functors. Every (dg) k-algebra A gives naturally rise to a dg category
with a single object. Another source of examples is provided by schemes/stacks.
Given a k-scheme X (or stack X ), the category of perfect complexes of OX -modules
perf(X) admits a canonical dg enhancement perf dg(X); consult [18, §4.6][25] for
details. More generally, given a sheaf of OX -algebras F , we can consider the dg
category of perfect complexes of F -modules perf dg(X; F ).
Noncommutative mixed motives. For a book, resp. recent survey, on noncom-
mutative motives we invite the reader to consult [31], resp. [30]. Recall from [31,
§8.5.1] (see also [20, 21, 22]) the definition of Kontsevich's triangulated category
of noncommutative mixed motives NMot(k). By construction, this category is
idempotent complete, symmetric monoidal, and comes equipped with a ⊗-functor
U : dgcat(k) → NMot(k).
In what follows, given a k-scheme X (or stack X )
equipped with a sheaf of OX -algebras F , we will write U (X; F ) := U (perf dg(X; F )).
3. Noncommutative mixed motives of twisted root stacks
Let X be a k-scheme, L a line bundle on X, σ ∈ Γ(X, L) a global section, and
r > 0 an integer. In what follows, we will write D ⊂ X for the zero locus of σ.
Recall from [8, Def. 2.2.1] (see also [1, Appendix B]) that the associated root stack
X is defined as the following fiber-product of algebraic stacks
X := rp(L, σ)/X
p
X
/ [A1/Gm]
θr
/ [A1/Gm] ,
(L,σ)
where θr stands for the morphism induced by the rth power maps on A1 and Gm.
A twisted root stack (X ; F ) consists of a root stack X equipped with a sheaf of
Azumaya algebras F . In what follows, we will write s for the product of the ranks
of F (at each one of the connected components of X ). The following result, which
is of independent interest, will play a key role in the proof of Theorem 1.1.
Theorem 3.1. Assume that X and D are k-smooth.
(i) We have an isomorphism U (X ) ≃ U (X) ⊕ U (D)⊕(r−1).
(ii) Assume moreover that char(k) 6= r and that k contains the rth roots of unity.
Under these extra assumptions, U (X ; F )1/rs belongs to the smallest thick tri-
angulated subcategory of NMot(k)1/rs containing the noncommutative mixed
motives {U (Vi)1/rs} and {U ( eDl
i)1/rs}, where Vi is any affine open subscheme
of X and eDl
i is any Galois l-fold cover of Di := D ∩ Vi with l ∤ r and l 6= 1.
Proof. We start by proving item (i). Following [16, Thm. 1.6], the pull-back func-
tor p∗ is fully-faithful and we have the following semi-orthogonal decomposition3
perf(X) = hperf(D)r−1, . . . , perf(D)1, p∗(perf(X)i. All the categories perf(D)j are
3Consult [5, 6] for the definition of semi-orthogonal decomposition.
/
/
SCHUR-FINITENESS (AND BASS-FINITENESS) CONJECTURE
5
equivalent (via a Fourier-Mukai type functor) to perf(D). Therefore, since the func-
tor U : dgcat(k) → NMot(k) sends semi-orthogonal decompositions to direct sums,
we obtain the searched direct sum decomposition U (X ) ≃ U (X) ⊕ U (D)⊕(r−1).
Let us now prove item (ii). We consider first the particular case where X =
Spec(A) is affine and the line bundle L = OX is trivial. Let µr be the group of
rth roots of unity and χ : µr → k× a (fixed) primitive character. Under these no-
tations, consider the global quotient [Spec(B)/µr], where B := A[t]/htr − σi and
the µr-action on B is given by g · t := χ(g)−1t for every g ∈ µr and by g · a := a
for every a ∈ A. As explained in [8, Example 2.4.1], the root stack X agrees, in
this particular case, with the global quotient [Spec(B)/µr]. By construction, the
induced map Spec(B) → X is a r-fold cover ramified over D ⊂ X. Moreover,
for every l such that l r and l 6= 1, the associated closed subscheme Spec(B)µl
agrees with the ramification divisor D ⊂ Spec(B). Therefore, since the functor
U (−)1/rs : dgcat(k) → NMot(k)1/rs is an additive invariant of dg categories in the
sense of [31, Def. 2.1] (see [31, §8.4.5]), we conclude from [34, Cor. 1.28(ii)] that, in
this particular case, U (X ; F )1/rs belongs to the smallest thick additive subcategory
of NMot(k)1/rs containing the noncommutative mixed motives U (Spec(B))µl
1/rs and
{U ( eDl)1/rs}, where eDl is any Galois l-fold cover of D with l ∤ r and l 6= 1. Fur-
thermore, since the geometric quotient Spec(B)//µr agrees with X and the latter
scheme is k-smooth, [34, Thm. 1.22] implies that U (Spec(B))µl
1/rs is isomorphic to
U (X)1/rs. This finishes the proof of item (ii) in the particular case where X is
affine and the line bundle L is trivial.
Let us now prove item (ii) in the general case. As explained above, given any
affine open subscheme Vi of X which trivializes the line bundle L, the noncommu-
tative mixed motive U (Vi; Fi)1/rs, with Vi := p−1(Vi) and Fi := FVi, belongs to
the smallest thick additive subcategory of NMot(k)1/rs containing U (Vi)1/rs and
{U ( eDl
i is any Galois l-fold cover of Di := D ∩Vi with l r and l 6= 1.
Let us then choose an affine open cover {Wi} of X which trivializes the line bundle
L. Since X is quasi-compact (recall that X is of finite type over k), this affine open
cover admits a finite subcover. Consequently, the proof follows by induction from
the Z[1/rs]-linearization of the distinguished triangles of Lemma 3.2 below.
(cid:3)
i)1/rs}, where eDl
Lemma 3.2. Given an open cover {W1, W2} of X, we have an induced Mayer-
Vietoris distinguished triangle of noncommutative mixed motives
(3.3)
U (X ; F ) −→ U (W1; F1) ⊕ U (W2; F2) ±−→ U (W12; F12) ∂−→ ΣU (X ; F ) ,
where W12 := W1 ∩ W2 and F12 := FW12.
Proof. Consider the following commutative diagram of dg categories
perf dg(X ; F )Z
/ perf dg(X ; F )
/ perf dg(W1; F1)
perf dg(W2; F2)Z
/ perfdg(W2; F2)
/ perf dg(W12; F12) ,
where Z stands for the closed complement X −W1 = W2 −W12 and perf dg(X ; F )Z ,
resp. perf dg(W2; F2)Z , stands for the full dg subcategory of perf dg(X ; F ), resp.
/
/
/
/
6
GONC¸ ALO TABUADA
perfdg(W2; F2), consisting of those perfect complexes of F -modules, resp. F2-
modules, that are supported on Z. Both rows are short exact sequences of dg cate-
gories in the sense of Drinfeld/Keller (see [18, §4.6]) and the left vertical dg functor
is a Morita equivalence. Therefore, since the functor U : dgcat(k) → NMot(k) is a
localizing invariant of dg categories in the sense of [31, §8.1], we obtain the following
induced morphism of distinguished triangles:
U (perf dg(X ; F )Z )
/ U (X ; F )
/ U (W1; F1)
∂
/ ΣU (perf dg(X ; F )Z )
≃
≃
U (perfdg(W2; F2)Z )
/ U (W2; F2)
/ U (W12; F12)
∂ /
/ ΣU (perf dg(W2; F2)Z ) .
Finally, since the middle square is homotopy (co)cartesian, we hence obtain the
claimed Mayer-Vietoris distinguished triangle (3.3).
(cid:3)
4. Proof of Theorem 1.1
Following [23, §3] (see also [2, §1.2]), let E be a vector bundle of rank d on
B, q′ : P(E) → B the projectivization of E on B, OP(E)(1) the Grothendieck line
bundle on P(E), L a line bundle on B, and finally ρ ∈ Γ(B, S2(E∨) ⊗ L∨) =
Γ(P(E), OP(E)(2) ⊗ L∨) a global section. Given this data, recall that Q ⊂ P(E)
is defined as the zero locus of ρ on P(E) and that q : Q → B is the restriction of
q′ to Q; note that the relative dimension of q is equal to d − 2. Consider also the
discriminant global section disc(q) ∈ Γ(B, det(E∨)⊗2 ⊗ (L∨)⊗d) and the associated
zero locus D ⊂ B; note that D agrees with the locus of the critical values of q.
Recall from [23, §3.5] (see also [2, §1.6]) that when d is even, we can consider
the discriminant cover eB := SpecB(Z(Cl0(q))) of B, where Z(Cl0(q)) stands for the
center of the sheaf Cl0(q) of even parts of the Clifford algebra associated to q; see
[23, §3] (and also [2, §1.5]). By construction, eB is a 2-fold cover ramified over D.
Moreover, since D is k-smooth, eB is also k-smooth.
Recall from [23, §3.6] (see also [2, §1.7]) that when d is odd and char(k) 6= 2,
we can consider the discriminant stack X := 2p(det(E∨)⊗2 ⊗ (L∨)⊗d, disc(q))/B.
Since char(k) 6= 2, X is a Deligne-Mumford stack with coarse moduli space B.
Proposition 4.1. Under the above notations, and assumptions, the following holds:
(i) When d is even, we have U (Q)1/2 ≃ U ( eB)1/2 ⊕ U (B)⊕(d−2)
(ii) When d is odd and char(k) 6= 2, U (Q)1/2 belongs to the smallest thick triangu-
lated subcategory of NMot(k)1/2 containing the noncommutative mixed motives
{U (Vi)1/2} and {U ( eDi)1/2}, where Vi is any affine open subscheme of B and
eDi is any Galois 2-fold cover of Di := D ∩ Vi.
1/2
.
Proof. As proved in [23, Thm. 4.2] (see also [2, Thm. 2.2.1]), we have the semi-
orthogonal decomposition perf(Q) = hperf(B; Cl0(q)), perf(B)1, . . . , perf(B)d−2i,
where perf(B)j := q∗(perf(B)) ⊗ OQ/B(j). All the categories perf(B)j are equiv-
alent (via a Fourier-Mukai type functor) to perf(B). Therefore, since the functor
U : dgcat(k) → NMot(k) sends semi-orthogonal decompositions to direct sums, we
obtain the direct sum decomposition U (Q) ≃ U (B; Cl0(q))) ⊕ U (B)⊕(d−2).
We start by proving item (i). As explained in [23, §3.5] (see also [2, §1.6]),
when d is even, the category perf(B; Cl0(q)) is equivalent (via a Fourier-Mukai
/
/
/
/
/
SCHUR-FINITENESS (AND BASS-FINITENESS) CONJECTURE
7
d
d−1
type functor) to perf( eB; F ) where F is a certain sheaf of Azumaya algebras on
2 −1. This leads to an isomorphism U (B; Cl0(q)) ≃ U ( eB; F ). Making
eB of rank 2
use of [35, Thm. 2.1], we hence conclude that U (B; Cl0(q))1/2 is isomorphic to
U ( eB; F )1/2 ≃ U ( eB)1/2. Consequently, we obtain the isomorphism of item (i).
Let us now prove item (ii). As explained in [23, §3.6] (see also [2, §1.7]),
when d is odd, the category perf(B; Cl0(q)) is equivalent (via a Fourier-Mukai
type functor) to perf(X ; F ) where F is a certain sheaf of Azumaya algebras on
X of rank 2
2 . This leads to an isomorphism U (B; Cl0(q)) ≃ U (X ; F ). By com-
bining Theorem 3.1(ii) with the isomorphism U (Q) ≃ U (X ; F ) ⊕ U (B)⊕(d−2), we
hence conclude that U (Q)1/2 belongs to the smallest thick triangulated subcat-
egory of NMot(k)1/2 containing U (B)1/2, {U (Vi)1/2}, and {U ( eDi)1/2}, where Vi
is any affine open subscheme of B and eDi is any Galois 2-fold cover of Di. We
now claim that U (B)1/2 belongs to the smallest thick triangulated subcategory
of NMot(k)1/2 containing {U (Vi)1/2}; note that this would conclude the proof.
Choose an affine open cover {Wi} of B. Since B is quasi-compact (recall that B
is of finite type over k), this affine open cover admits a finite subcover. Therefore,
similarly to the proof of Theorem 3.1, our claim follows from an inductive argu-
ment using the Z[1/2]-linearization of the Mayer-Vietoris distinguished triangles
U (B) → U (W1) ⊕ U (W2) ±→ U (W12) ∂→ ΣU (B).
(cid:3)
As proved in [32, Thm. 2.8], there exists a Q-linear, fully-faithful, ⊗-functor Φ
making the following diagram commute
(4.2)
Sm(k)
X7→perf dg(X)
M(−)Q
DMgm(k)Q
π
dgcat(k)
U(−)Q
NMot(k)Q
Hom(−,U(k)Q)
DMgm(k)Q/−⊗Q(1)[2]
Φ
/ NMot(k)Q ,
where DMgm(k)Q/−⊗Q(1)[2] stands for the orbit category with respect to the Tate
motive Q(1)[2] and Hom(−, −) for the internal Hom of the monoidal structure;
note that the functors X 7→ perf dg(X) and Hom(−, U (k)Q) are contravariant. By
construction, π is a faithful ⊗-functor. Therefore, it follows from [26, Lem. 1.11]
that we have the following equivalence:
(4.3) S(X) ⇔ the noncommutative mixed motive (Φ ◦ π)(M (X)Q) is Schur-finite.
We now have all the ingredients necessary to conclude the proof of Theorem 1.1.
Item (i). The above functors π and Hom(−, U (k)Q) are Q-linear. Therefore, by
combining Proposition 4.1(i) with the commutative diagram (4.2), we conclude that
(4.4)
(Φ ◦ π)(M (Q)Q) ≃ (Φ ◦ π)(M ( eB)Q) ⊕ (Φ ◦ π)(M (B)Q)⊕(d−2) .
Since Schur-finiteness is stable under direct sums and direct summands, the proof
of the equivalence S(Q) ⇔ S(B) + S( eB) follows then from (4.3)-(4.4).
/
/
/
8
GONC¸ ALO TABUADA
Item (ii). Recall from [31, §8.5.1-8.5.2] that, by construction, NMot(k)Q is a Q-
linear closed symmetric monoidal triangulated category in the sense of Hovey [15,
§6-7]. As proved in [10, Thm. 1], this implies that Schur-finiteness has the 2-out-
of-3 property with respect to distinguished triangles. The functor Hom(−, U (k)Q)
is triangulated. Hence, by combining Proposition 4.1(ii) with the commutative
diagram (4.2), we conclude that (Φ ◦ π)(M (Q)Q) belongs to the smallest thick tri-
angulated subcategory of NMot(k)Q containing the noncommutative mixed motives
{(Φ ◦ π)(M (Vi)Q)} and {(Φ ◦ π)(M ( eDi)Q)}, where Vi is any affine open subscheme
of B and eDi is any Galois 2-fold cover of Di. Since by assumption the conjectures
{S(Vi)} and {S( eDi)} hold, (4.3) implies that the noncommutative mixed motives
{(Φ ◦ π)(M (Vi)Q)} and {(Φ ◦ π)(M ( eDi)Q)} are Schur-finite. Therefore, making use
of the 2-out-of-3 property of Schur-finiteness with respect to distinguished trian-
gles (and of the stability of Schur-finiteness under direct summands), we conclude
that (Φ ◦ π)(M (Q)Q) is also Schur-finite. The proof follows now from the above
equivalence (4.3).
5. Proof of Theorem 1.5
Recall from the proof of Proposition 4.1 that we have the semi-orthogonal de-
composition perf(Q) = hperf(Pm−1; Cl0(q)), perf(Pm−1)1, . . . , perf(Pm−1)d−2i, and
consequently the following direct sum decompositon:
(5.1)
U (Q) ≃ U (Pm−1; Cl0(q)) ⊕ U (Pm−1)⊕(d−2) .
As proved in [23, Thm. 5.5] (see also [2, Thm. 2.3.7]), the following also holds:
(a) When 2m < d, we have perf(Y ) = hperf(Pm−1; Cl0(q)), O(1), . . . , O(d − 2m)i.
Consequently, since the functor U : dgcat(k) → NMot(k) sends semi-orthogonal
decompositions to direct sums, we obtain the following direct sum decompo-
sition U (Y ) ≃ U (Pm−1; Cl0(q)) ⊕ U (k)⊕(d−2m).
(b) When 2m = d, the category perf(Y ) is equivalence (via a Fourier-Mukai type
functor) to perf(Pm−1; Cl0(q)). Consequently, we obtain an isomorphism of
noncommutative mixed motives U (Y ) ≃ U (Pm−1; Cl0(q)).
(c) When 2m > d, perf(Y ) is an admissible subcategory of perf(Pm−1; Cl0(q)).
This implies that U (Y ) is a direct summand of U (Pm−1; Cl0(q)).
Let us now prove the implication S(Q) ⇒ S(Y ).
If the conjecture S(Q) holds,
then it follows from the decomposition (5.1), from the commutative diagram (4.2),
from the equivalence (4.3), and from the stability of Schur-finiteness under direct
summands, that the noncommutative mixed motive Hom(U (Pm−1; Cl0(q))Q, U (k)Q)
is Schur-finite. Making use of the above descriptions (a)-(c) of U (Y ) and of the
commutative diagram (4.2), we hence conclude that the noncommutative mixed
motive (Φ ◦ π)(M (Y )Q) is also Schur-finite. Consequently, the conjecture S(Y )
follows now from the above equivalence (4.3). Finally, note that when 2m ≤ d, a
similar argument proves the converse implication S(Y ) ⇒ S(Q).
6. Proof of Theorem 1.7
Recall first from [24, Prop. 5.12] that since char(k) 6∈ {2, 3} and T is k-smooth,
the k-schemes B, Z2 and Z3 are also k-smooth.
Proposition 6.1. We have U (T )1/6 ≃ U (B)1/6 ⊕ U (Z2)1/6 ⊕ U (Z3)1/6.
SCHUR-FINITENESS (AND BASS-FINITENESS) CONJECTURE
9
Proof. As proved in [24, Thm. 5.2 and Prop. 5.10], we have the semi-orthogonal
decomposition perf(T ) = hperf(B), perf(Z2; F2), perf(Z3; F3)i, where F2 (resp. F3)
is a certain sheaf of Azumaya algebras over Z2 (resp. Z3) of order 2 (resp. 3). Recall
that the functor U : dgcat(k) → NMot(k) sends semi-orthogonal decompositions to
direct sums. Therefore, we obtain the following direct sum decomposition:
(6.2)
U (T ) ≃ U (B) ⊕ U (Z2; F2) ⊕ U (Z3; F3) .
Since F2 (resp. F3) is of order 2 (resp. 3), the rank of F2 (resp. F3) is necessarily
a power of 2 (resp. 3). Making use of [35, Thm. 2.1], we hence conclude that the
noncommutative mixed motive U (Z2; F2)1/2 (resp. U (Z3; F3)1/3) is isomorphic to
U (Z2)1/2 (resp. U (Z3)1/3). Consequently, the proof follows now from the Z[1/6]-
linearization of (6.2).
(cid:3)
The functors π and Hom(−, U (k)Q) in (4.2) are Q-linear. Therefore, similarly
to the proof of item (i) of Theorem 1.1, by combining Proposition 6.1 with the
commutative diagram (4.2), we conclude that
(6.3) (Φ ◦ π)(M (T )Q) ≃ (Φ ◦ π)(M ( eB)Q) ⊕ (Φ ◦ π)(M (Z2)Q) ⊕ (Φ ◦ π)(M (Z3)Q) .
Since Schur-finiteness is stable under direct sums and direct summands, the proof
follows then from the combination of (6.3) with the above equivalence (4.3).
7. Proof of Theorem 1.10
Item (i). We start by proving the first claim. As explained in [31, §8.6] (see also
[33, Thm. 15.10]), given X ∈ Sm(k), we have the isomorphisms of abelian groups:
(7.1)
HomNMot(k)(U (k), Σ−nU (X)) ≃ Kn(X)
n ∈ Z .
Assume that d is even. By combining Proposition 4.1(i) with the Z[1/2]-linearization
of (7.1), we conclude that Kn(Q)1/2 ≃ Kn( eB)1/2 ⊕ Kn(B)⊕(d−2)
. Therefore, since
finite generation is stable under direct sums and direct summands, we obtain the
equivalence B(Q)1/2 ⇔ B(B)1/2 + B( eB)1/2. Assume now that d is odd and that
char(k) 6= 2. Finite generation has the 2-out-of-3 property with respect to (short or
long) exact sequences and is stable under direct summands. Therefore, the proof
of the implication {B(Vi)1/2} + {B( eDi)1/2} ⇒ B(Q)1/2 follows from the combi-
nation of Proposition 4.1(ii) with the Z[1/2]-linearization of (7.1). Finally, recall
from [12, 27, 28] that the conjecture B(X) holds in the case where dim(X) ≤ 1.
Therefore, the Corollaries 1.2-1.3 also hold similarly for the conjecture B(−)1/2.
1/2
We now prove the second claim. Let q : Q → B be a quadric fibration as in
Theorem 1.1 with B a curve. Thanks to Corollary 1.2 (for the conjecture B(−)1/2),
it suffices to show that the groups Kn(Q), n ≥ 2, are torsion. Assume first that d is
even. By combining Proposition 4.1(i) with the Q-linearization of (7.1), we obtain
an isomorphism Kn(Q)Q ≃ Kn( eB)Q ⊕ Kn(B)⊕(d−2)
. Thanks to Proposition 7.2
below, we have Kn( eB)Q = Kn(B)Q = 0 for every n ≥ 2. Therefore, we conclude
that the groups Kn(Q), n ≥ 2, are torsion. Assume now that d is even and that
char(k) 6= 2. Thanks to Proposition 4.1(ii), U (Q)Q belongs to the smallest thick
triangulated subcategory of NMot(k)Q containing the noncommutative mixed mo-
tives {U (Vi)Q} and {U ( eDi)Q}, where Vi is any affine open subscheme of B and
eDi is any Galois 2-fold cover of Di. Moreover, U (Q)Q may be explicitly obtained
from {U (Vi)Q} and {U ( eDi)Q} using solely the Q-linearization of the Mayer-Vietoris
Q
10
GONC¸ ALO TABUADA
distinguished triangles. Therefore, since Kn(Vi)Q = 0 for every n ≥ 2 (see Propo-
sition 7.2 below) and Kn( eDi)Q = 0 for every n ≥ 1 (see Quillen's computation
[28] of the algebraic K-theory of a finite field), an inductive argument using the
Q-linearization of (7.1) and the Q-linearization of the Mayer-Vietoris distinguished
triangles implies that the groups Kn(Q), n ≥ 2, are torsion.
Proposition 7.2. We have Kn(X)Q = 0 for every n ≥ 2 and smooth k-curve X.
Proof. In the particular case where X is affine, this result was proved in [13,
Cor. 3.2.3] (see also [12, Thm. 0.5]).
In the general case, choose an affine open
cover {Wi} of X. Since X is quasi-compact, this affine open cover admits a fi-
nite subcover. Therefore, the proof follows from an inductive argument (similar to
the one in the proof of Theorem 3.1(ii)) using the Q-linearization of (7.1) and the
Q-linearization of the Mayer-Vietoris distinguished triangles.
(cid:3)
Item (ii). If the conjecture B(Q) holds, then it follows from the decomposi-
tion (5.1) and from the isomorphisms (7.1) that the algebraic K-theory groups
Kn(perf dg(Pm−1; Cl0(q))), n ≥ 0, are finitely generated. Therefore, by combining
the descriptions (a)-(c) of the noncommutative mixed motive U (Y ) (see the proof of
Theorem 1.5) with (7.1), we conclude that the conjecture B(Y ) also holds. Note that
when 2m ≤ d, a similar argument proves the converse implication B(Y ) ⇒ B(Q).
Item (iii). Items (i)-(ii) of Theorem 1.10 imply that Corollary 1.6 holds similarly
for the conjecture B(−)1/2. We now address the second claim. Let q : Q → P1
be the quadric fibration associated to the smooth complete intersection Y of two
quadric hypersurfaces. Thanks to item (i), the groups Kn(Q)1/2, n ≥ 2, are finite.
Therefore, making use of the decomposition (5.1), of the Z[1/2]-linearization of
(7.1), and of the above descriptions (a)-(c) of U (Y ) (see the proof of Theorem 1.5),
we conclude that the groups Kn(Y )1/2, n ≥ 2, are also finite.
Item (iv). We start by proving the first claim. By combining Proposition 6.1 with
the Z[1/6]-linearization of (7.1), we conclude that
Kn(T )1/6 ≃ Kn(B)1/6 ⊕ Kn(Z2)1/6 ⊕ Kn(Z3)1/6 .
Therefore, since finite generation is stable under sums and direct summands, we
obtain the equivalence B(T )1/6 ⇔ B(B)1/6 + B(Z2)1/6 + B(Z3)1/6. As mentioned
in the proof of item (i), the conjecture B(X) holds in the case where dim(X) ≤ 1.
Hence, Corollary 1.8 also holds similarly for the conjecture B(−)1/6.
We now prove the second claim. Let f : T → B be a family of sextic du Val
del Pezzo surfaces as in Theorem 1.7 with B a curve. Similarly to the proof of
item (i) of Theorem 1.10, it suffices to show that the groups Kn(T ), n ≥ 2, are
torsion. By combining Proposition 6.1 with the Q-linearization of (7.1), we obtain
an isomorphism Kn(T )Q ≃ Kn(B)Q ⊕ Kn(Z2)Q ⊕ Kn(Z3)Q. Thanks to Proposition
7.2, we have moreover Kn(B)Q = Kn(Z2)Q = Kn(Z3)Q = 0 for every n ≥ 2.
Therefore, we conclude that the groups Kn(T ), n ≥ 2, are torsion.
Acknowledgments: The author is grateful to Joseph Ayoub for useful e-mail
exchanges concerning the Schur-finiteness conjecture. The author also would like
to thank the Hausdorff Research Institute for Mathematics for its hospitality.
SCHUR-FINITENESS (AND BASS-FINITENESS) CONJECTURE
11
References
[1] D. Abramovich, T. Graber and A. Vistoli, Gromov-Witten theory of Deligne-Mumford stacks.
Amer. J. Math. 130 (2008), no. 5, 1337 -- 1398.
[2] A. Auel, M. Bernardara and M. Bolognesi, Fibrations in complete intersections of quadrics,
Clifford algebras, derived categories, and rationality problems. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 102
(2014), no. 1, 249 -- 291.
[3] H. Bass, Some problems in classical algebraic K-theory. Algebraic K- theory, II: "Classical"
algebraic K-theory and connections with arithmetic (Proc. Conf., Battelle Memorial Inst.,
Seattle, Wash., 1972), pp. 3 -- 73. LNM 342, 1973.
[4] S. Bloch, A. Kas and D. Lieberman, Zero cycles on surfaces with pg = 0. Compositio Math.
33 (1976), 135 -- 145.
[5] A. Bondal and D. Orlov, Derived categories of coherent sheaves. Proceedings of the Interna-
tional Congress of Mathematicians, Vol. II (Beijing, 2002), pp. 47 -- 56.
, Semiorthogonal decomposition for algebraic varieties. arXiv:alg-geom/9506012.
[6]
[7] J. Bouali, Motives of quadric bundles. Manuscr. Math. 149 (3-4) (2016), 347 -- 368.
[8] C. Cadman, Using stacks to impose tangency conditions on curves. Amer. J. Math. 129
(2007), no. 2, 405 -- 427.
[9] P. Deligne, Cat´egories tensorielles. Dedicated to Yuri I. Manin on the occasion of his 65th
birthday. Mosc. Math. J. 2 (2002), no. 2, 227 -- 248.
[10] V. Guletskii, Finite-dimensional objects in distinguished triangles. J. Number Theory 119
(2006), no. 1, 99 -- 127.
[11] V. Guletskii and C. Pedrini, Finite-dimensional motives and the conjectures of Beilinson and
Murre. Special issue in honor of Hyman Bass on his seventieth birthday. Part III. K-Theory
30 (2003), no. 3, 243 -- 263.
[12] D. Grayson, Finite generation of K-groups of a curve over a finite field (after Daniel
Quillen). Algebraic K-theory, Part I (Oberwolfach, 1980), pp. 69 -- 90, LNM 966, 1982.
[13] G. Harder, Die Kohomologie S-arithmetischer Gruppen uber Funktionenkorpern. Invent.
Math. 42 (1977), 135 -- 175.
[14] K. Helmsauer, Chow Motives of del Pezzo surfaces of degree 5 and 6. Ph.D. thesis (2013).
Available at https://era.library.ualberta.ca/files/f7623d587#.WdQx-saZN0E.
[15] M. Hovey, Model categories. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 63. American Math-
ematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999.
[16] A. Ishii and K. Ueda, The special McKay correspondence and exceptional collections. Tohoku
Math. J. (2) 67(4) (2015), 585 -- 609.
[17] B. Kahn, Algebraic K-theory, algebraic cycles and arithmetic geometry. Handbook of Alge-
braic K-theory, Berlin, New York. Springer-Verlag, pp. 351 -- 428, 2005.
[18] B. Keller, On differential graded categories. International Congress of Mathematicians
(Madrid), Vol. II, 151 -- 190. Eur. Math. Soc., Zurich (2006).
[19] S.-I. Kimura, Chow groups are finite dimensional, in some sense. Math. Ann. 331 (2005),
no. 1, 173 -- 201.
[21]
[20] Maxim Kontsevich, Mixed noncommutative motives. Talk at the Workshop on Homological
Mirror Symmetry, Miami, 2010. Available at www-math.mit.edu/auroux/frg/miami10-notes.
in
honor of Yu. I. Manin. Vol. II, Progr. Math., vol. 270, Birkhauser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA,
2009, pp. 213 -- 247.
, Notes on motives in finite characteristic. Algebra, arithmetic, and geometry:
[22]
, Noncommutative motives. Talk at the IAS on the occasion of the 61st birthday of
Pierre Deligne (2005). Available at http://video.ias.edu/Geometry-and-Arithmetic.
[23] A. Kuznetsov, Derived categories of quadric fibrations and intersections of quadrics. Adv.
Math. 218 (2008), no. 5, 1340 -- 1369.
[24]
, Derived categories of
families of sextic del Pezzo surfaces. Available at
arXiv:1708.00522.
[25] V. Lunts and D. Orlov, Uniqueness of enhancement for triangulated categories. J. Amer.
Math. Soc. 23 (2010), no. 3, 853 -- 908.
[26] C. Mazza, Schur functors and motives. K-Theory 33 (2004), no. 2, 89 -- 106.
[27] D. Quillen, Finite generation of the groups Ki of rings of algebraic integers. Cohomology of
groups and algebraic K-theory, 479 -- 488, Adv. Lect. Math. (ALM), 12 (2010).
12
GONC¸ ALO TABUADA
[28]
, On the cohomology and K-theory of the general linear groups over a finite field.
Ann. of Math. (2) 96 (1972), 552 -- 586.
[29] A. Shermenev, The motive of an abelian variety. Funct. Anal. 8 (1974), 47 -- 53.
[30] G. Tabuada, Recent developments on noncommutative motives. New Directions in Homotopy
Theory, Contemporary Mathematics 707 (2018), 143 -- 173.
[31]
[32]
, Noncommutative Motives. With a preface by Yuri I. Manin. University Lecture
Series, 63. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015.
, Voevodsky's mixed motives versus Kontsevich's noncommutative mixed motives. Ad-
vances in Mathematics 264 (2014), 506 -- 545.
[33]
, Higher K-theory via universal invariants. Duke Math. J. 145 (2008), no. 1, 121 -- 206.
[34] G. Tabuada and M. Van den Bergh, Additive invariants of orbifolds. Geometry and Topology
22 (2018), 3003 -- 3048
[35]
, Noncommutative motives of Azumaya algebras. J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 14 (2015),
no. 2, 379 -- 403.
[36] C. Vial, Algebraic cycles and fibrations. Doc. Math. 18 (2013), 1521 -- 1553.
[37] V. Voevodsky, Triangulated categories of motives over a field. Cycles, transfers, and motivic
homology theories, 188 -- 238, Ann. of Math. Stud., 143, Princeton, NJ, 2000.
[38] C. Voisin, Bloch's conjecture for Catanese and Barlow surfaces. J. Differential Geom. 97
(2014), no. 1, 149 -- 175.
[39]
, Sur les z´ero-cycles de certaines hypersurfaces munies d'un automorphisme. Ann.
Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa 19 (1992), 473 -- 492.
Gonc¸alo Tabuada, Department of Mathematics, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
E-mail address: [email protected]
URL: http://math.mit.edu/~tabuada
|
1601.02743 | 1 | 1601 | 2016-01-12T06:26:37 | Lectures notes in universal algebraic geometry | [
"math.AG"
] | Lectures notes in universal algebraic geometry for beginners | math.AG | math |
Lectures notes in universal algebraic geometry
Artem N. Shevlyakov
January 13, 2016
Contents
1 Introduction
2 Algebraic structures
2.1 Free objects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2 Abelian groups
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.3 Semigroups
3 Subalgebras, direct products, homomorphisms
4 Simplifications of terms
2
3
4
5
5
6
8
5 Equations and solutions
5.1 Simplifications of equations
9
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
6 Algebraic sets and radicals
11
6.1 Radicals and congruent closures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
6.2
Irreducible algebraic sets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
7 Equationally Noetherian algebras
14
7.1 Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
8 Coordinate algebras
9 Main problems of universal algebraic geometry
10 Properties of coordinate algebras
11 Coordinate algebras of irreducible algebraic sets
12 When all algebraic sets are irreducible
20
22
23
28
30
13 The intervention of model theory
32
13.1 Quasi-identities and universal formulas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
13.2 Coordinate algebras . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
13.3 Irreducible algebraic sets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
14 Geometrical equivalence
41
1
15 Unifying theorems
42
16 Appearances of constants
43
16.1 Equations with constants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
16.2 New algebraic sets
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
16.3 Equationally Noetherian algebras with constants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
17 Coordinate algebras with constants
17.1 Coordinate groups over abelian groups
17.2 Irreducible coordinate groups over abelian groups
45
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
18 Equational domains
50
18.1 Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
19 Types of equational compactness
54
19.1 Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
20 Advances of algebraic geometry and further reading
57
20.1 Further reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
20.2 Groups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
20.3 Semigroups
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
20.4 Algebras . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
1
Introduction
Universal algebraic geometry studies the general properties of equations over arbitrary al-
gebraic structures. Such general principles really exist, and there are at least two attempts
to explain them.
1. In the papers by B.I. Plotkin (with co-authors) [93]–[100] such principles were ex-
plained in the language of Lindebaum algebras.
2. In the papers [1, 2, 3, 4] written by E. Daniyarova, A. Miasnikov, V. Remeslennikov
(DMR) the universal algebraic geometry is studied by the methods of model theory
and universal algebras.
The main achievement of DMR is the pair of so-called Unifying theorems (see The-
orems 15.1, 15.2 of our paper). The Unifying theorems give the connections between
equations and other six (!) notions in algebra. Thus, the universal algebras geometry
becomes a set of six equivalent approaches for solving equations over arbitrary algebraic
structures. Therefore, any researcher may choose the most useful approach for him to
solve equations over the given algebraic structure.
Moreover, the statements of Unifying theorems give the connection between equations
and elementary theory of an algebraic structure A. Therefore, the study of equations over
A is the starting point in the study of the elementary theory Th(A). This strategy was
applied by O. Kharlampovich and A. Miasnikov in [66, 67, 68], where the description of
the solution sets of equations over free non-abelian groups allowed to solve positively the
famous Tarski problem in [69].
Unfortunately, there are difficulties in the reading of DMRs‘ papers [1]– [5], since the
authors use the abstract language of model theory and rarely give examples. We hope our
2
survey elementary explains the ideas of DMR and gives numerous examples for universal
algebraic geometry.
In the series of the papers by DMR we extract the main results, prove them by ele-
mentary methods and illustrate by numerous examples. Thus, each section of our survey
consists of two parts. In the first part we give definitions and theorems of universal alge-
braic geometry, and in the second one we explain them with examples from the following
classes of algebraic structures:
• abelian groups (here we follow the paper [89]);
• free monoids and semigroups;
• the additive monoid of natural numbers (here we follow the papers [9, 10]);
• semilattices;
• rectangular bands;
• lest zero semigroups;
• unars (unar is a set equipped with a unary function f (x)).
In the first sections we consider all algebraic structures above in the “standard” lan-
guages (for example, any group is an algebraic structure of the language Lg = {·,−1 , 1}).
It follows that we study equations with no constants (parameters). The general case
(equations with constants) is studied in Section 16.
The survey is concluded by Section 20, where we refer to papers devoted to equations
in various classes of algebraic structures.
We tried to write an elementary survey. The reader needs only the simple facts in
linear algebra and group theory. Some notions in our text are marked by the symbolWiki.
For example, the expression “cyclic groupWiki”means that the survey does not contain the
definition of a cyclic group, but we recommend the reader to find it in Wikipedia.
2 Algebraic structures
, f (n2)
2
, . . .}, where f ni
1
A set of functional symbols L = {f (n1)
i denotes a ni-ary function, is
a functional language (language, for shortness). A functional 0-ary symbol f (0)
is called
a constant symbol, and in the sequel we shall denote constant symbols with no upper
index. An algebraic structure A = hA Li of a language L (L-algebra for shortness) is
an nonempty set A, where each functional symbol f (ni)
∈ L corresponds to a function
f A
corresponds to some element of A). The
i
function f A
∈ L. The set A of an
i
L-algebra A is the universe of A. If A = 1 an algebraic structure A is called trivial.
is called the interpretation of a functional symbol f (ni)
: Ani → A (clearly, each constant symbol f (0)
i
i
i
i
We shall use the following denotations: an expression a ∈ A ((a1, a2, . . . , an) ∈ An)
means a ∈ A (respectively, (a1, a2, . . . , an) ∈ An).
Let us define main classes of algebraic structures which are used for our examples.
1. An algebra A of the language Ls = {·(2)} is a semigroup, if A satisfies the axiom of
the associativity
∀x∀y∀z (xy)z = x(yz).
(1)
The binary function · is called a multiplication.
3
2. An algebra A of the language Lm = {·(2), 1} is a monoid, if A satisfies (1) and
∀x(x · 1 = x), ∀x(x · 1 = x).
(2)
The element 1 is the identity of a monoid A.
3. An algebra A of the language Lg = {·(2), −1(1), 1} is a group, if A satisfies (1, 2) and
∀x(xx−1 = 1), ∀x(x−1x = 1)
(3)
The unary function −1 is called an inversion.
4. A group is commutative, if it satisfies
∀x∀y (xy = yx).
Commutative groups (abelian groups) are considered as algebraic structures of the
additive language L+g = {+, −, 0}, where the binary operation + is called an
addition and 0 is the zero element. Similarly, one can define commutative semi-
groups (monoids) as algebraic structures of the language L+s = {+(2)} (respectively,
L+m = {+(2), 0}).
5. Any algebraic structure of the language Lu = {f (1)} is said to be unar.
2.1 Free objects
Let us give the definition of a term of a language L (L-term for shortness) in variables
X = {x1, x2, . . . , xn} as follows:
1. any variable xi ∈ X is an L-term;
2. if f (m) is a functional symbol of a language L and t1(X), t2(X), . . . , tm(X) are L-
terms, then the expression f (m)(t1(X), t2(X), . . . , tm(X)) is an L-term.
Since any constant symbol of a language L is a 0-ary functional symbol, all constant
symbols are L-terms.
Remark 2.1. Roughly speaking, an L-term is a composition of variables X, constant
and functional symbols of L.
According to the definition, L-terms may be very complicated expressions. For exam-
ple, the following expressions are terms of the group language Lg:
x1, x1(x1)−1, ((x1x2)(x3)−1), (((x1)−1)−1)−1, ((1−1)(1−1))−1.
In Section 5.1 we discuss the ways to simplify L-terms in some classes of L-algebras.
A formulaWikiof the language L of the form
∀x1∀x2 . . . ∀xn t(x1, x2, . . . , xn) = s(x1, x2, . . . , xn),
where t, s are terms of L, is called an identity. The class of L-algebras defined by a set
of identities is called a variety. Obviously, the classes of all semigroups and monoids
are defined by the identities of the languages Ls, Lm respectively, therefore such classes
form varieties. By Birkgof‘s theoremWikiany variety contains a freeWikiobject. Thus, there
4
exist free semigroups F Sn and free monoids F Mn of rankWikin. Below we give constrictive
definitions for F Sn and F Mn.
The class of all algebraic structures of the language Lu forms the variety of unars. Let
us denote the free unar of rank n by F Un. It is easy to prove that F Un is isomorphicWiki(we
give the definition of an isomorphism in Section 3) to the disjoint union of n copies of
natural numbers N1, N2, . . . , Nn, Ni = {0i, 1i, 2i, . . . , ki, . . .}, and the function f is defined
as follows f (ki) = (k + 1)i.
2.2 Abelian groups
We shall use the following denotations.
1. Z is the abelian group of integers {0, ±1, ±2, . . .} relative to the operation of the
addition.
2. Zn is the cyclicWikigroup of order n. Elements of Zn are denoted by natural numbers
{0, 1, 2, . . . , n − 1} relative to the addition modulo n.
2.3 Semigroups
In the variety of semigroups we deal only with the following classes of semigroups.
1. A semilattice S is a semigroup, where all elements are idempotents (∀x xx = x) and
commute (∀x∀y xy = yx). Any semilattice admits a partial order
x ≤ y ⇔ xy = x.
If a partial order over S is linearWiki, the semigroup is said to be linearly ordered.
A linearly ordered semilattice with exactly n elements is denoted by Ln.
2. A left zero semigroup is a semigroup which satisfies the identity
∀x∀y xy = x.
It is easy to prove that there exists a unique (up to isomorphism) left zero semigroup
with n elements. Let us denote such semigroup by LZn.
3. A rectangular band is a semigroup which satisfies the identity
∀x xx = x, ∀x∀y∀z xyz = xz.
By semigroup theory, any rectangular band is isomorphic to a set of pairs
RB(n, m) = {(i, j) 1 ≤ i ≤ n, 1 ≤ j ≤ m} under multiplication (i, j)(i′, j′) =
(i, j′). Obviously, RB(n, m) is a left zero semigroup if m = 1.
4. The free semigroup F Sn of rank n is the set of all words in an alphabet An =
{a1, a2, . . . , an} under the operation of a word concatenation.
5. The free monoid F Mn of rank n is obtained from F Sn by the adjunction of the
empty word 1 which satisfies the identity axiom (2).
6. For n = 1 the free monoid F Mn is isomorphic to the monoid of natural numbers
N = {0, 1, 2, . . .} relative to the addition. In the sequel we consider the monoid N
in the language L+m.
5
7. A semigroup S has cancellations if each equality xy = xz, yx = zx implies y = z.
It is directly checked that the free monoids F Mn has cancellations.
By the definition, the class of all semilattices (respectively, rectangular bands, left zero
semigroups) forms a variety.
3 Subalgebras, direct products, homomorphisms
Let A = hA Li be an algebraic structure of a language L. An L-algebra B = hB Li is
called a subalgebra of A if
1. B ⊆ A;
2. all functions over B are restrictions of corresponding functions over A
f B(b1, b2, . . . , bn) = f A(b1, b2, . . . , bn),
3. B is closed under all functions f B.
By the definition, any subalgebra of an L-algebra A should contain all constants
from the set A, since constants are unary functions over A. Obviously, in the variety
of groups (semigroups) subalgebras of a group (respectively, semigroup) A are exactly
subgroupsWiki(respectively, subsemigroupsWiki) of A.
An L-algebra A = hA Li is finitely generated if there exists a finite set of elements
S = a1, a2, . . . , an such that any non-constant element of A is a value of a composition of
functions over A at a point P = (p1, p2, . . . , pm) where for each i either pi ∈ S or pi is a
constant of an L-algebra A.
Remark that an L-algebra A is always finitely generated if each element of A is defined
as constant.
One calls a variety V of L-algebras locally finite if every finitely generated algebra from
V has finite cardinality. For example, the varieties of semilattices, left zero semigroups
and rectangular bands are locally finite.
Let A = hA Li, B = hB Li be L-algebras. A map φ : A → B is called a homomor-
phism if for any functional symbol f (n) ∈ L it holds
φ(f A(a1, a2, . . . , an)) = f B(φ(a1), φ(a2), . . . , φ(an)).
It follows that for any constant symbol c ∈ L we have the equality φ(cA) = cB.
In
other words, any homomorphism should map constants into constants. The set of all
homomorphisms between L-algebras A, B is denoted by Hom(A, B).
Let us apply the general definition of a homomorphism to groups, semigroups and
unars.
1. A map φ : A → B is a homomorphism between two semigroups A, B of the language
Ls if for all a1, a2 ∈ A it holds
φ(a1 · a2) = a1 · a2
(4)
2. A map φ : A → B is a homomorphism between two monoids A, B of the language
Lm if for all a1, a2 ∈ A it holds (4) and
φ(1) = 1
6
(5)
3. A map φ : A → B is a homomorphism between two groups A, B of the language Lg
if for all a1, a2 ∈ A it holds (4, 5) and
φ(a−1
1 ) = φ(a1)−1.
(6)
4. A map φ : A → B is a homomorphism between two unars A, B of a language Lu if
for any a ∈ A we have φ(f (a)) = f (φ(a)).
A homomorphism φ ∈ Hom(A, B) is an embedding if φ is injective, i.e. for any pair of
distinct elements a1, a2 ∈ A it holds φ(a1) 6= φ(a2).
Let us describe homomorphism sets and embeddings for some algebras A, B (in all
examples below p, q are distinct primes).
1. The abelian group Zpn is embedded into Zpm iff n ≤ m. For example, Z4 =
{0, 1, 2, 3} is embedded into Z8 = {0, 1, . . . , 7} by φ(x) = 2 · x.
2. Any homomorphism φ ∈ Hom(Zpn, Zpm) (n > m) maps an element pm ∈ Zpn into
0 ∈ Zpm.
3. The unique homomorphism of the set Hom(Zpn, Zqm) (p 6= q) is the trivial homo-
morphism φ(x) = 0.
4. The unique homomorphism of the set Hom(Zpn, Z) is the trivial homomorphism
φ(x) = 0.
5. Any homomorphism between Z and Zpn should map the element pn ∈ Z into 0 ∈ Zpn.
6. The left zero semigroup LZn is embedded into LZm iff n ≤ m.
7. Clearly, a rectangular band RB(n, m) is embedded into RB(n′, m′) iff n ≤ n′,
m ≤ m′.
A homomorphism φ ∈ Hom(A, B) of two L-algebras A, B is an isomorphism if φ is
bijective. A pair of isomorphic L-algebras A, B is denoted by A ∼= B.
Let {Ai i ∈ I} be a family of L-algebras. The direct product A = Qi∈I Ai is an
L-algebra of all tuples
(a1, a2, . . . , an, . . .), ai ∈ Ai,
and the value of any function f over A is the tuple of values of f in algebras Ai. For
example, a binary function f (x, y) over A is computed as follows
f A((a1, a2, . . . , an, . . .), (a′
1, a′
2, . . . , a′
n, . . .)) = (f A1(a1, a′
1), f A2(a2, a′
2), . . . , f An(an, a′
n), . . .).
By the definition of a direct product, we have the following interpretation of constant
symbols. Suppose ai ∈ Ai is an interpretation of a constant symbol c ∈ L in Ai, then the
element (a1, a2, . . . , ai, . . .) is the interpretation of c in the algebra A.
a direct power of an algebra B.
If all algebras Ai are isomorphic to an algebra B, the direct product Qi Ai is called
Let A = Qi∈I Ai. By πi : A → Ai we shall denote the projection of A onto the
subalgebra Ai. In other words,
πi((a1, a2, . . . , ai, . . .)) = ai.
It is directly checked that any projection πi is a homomorphism between A and Ai.
Let us give examples of direct products in various classes of algebras.
7
1. In the category of abelian groups direct products are called direct sums and denoted
by ⊕.For example, one can prove that the cyclic group Z6 is isomorphic to the direct
sum Z2 ⊕ Z3.
By the theory of abelian groups, any finitely generated abelian group A is isomorphic
to a direct sum
Z ⊕ Z ⊕ . . . ⊕ Z ⊕ Zp
n1
1
⊕ Zp
n2
2
⊕ . . . ⊕ Zp
,
nl
l
(7)
where pi are primes. The subgroup Zp
A and denoted by T (A).
⊕ Zp
n2
2
n1
1
⊕ . . . ⊕ Zp
nl
l
is the torsion of a group
2. The proof of the following two facts is refer to the reader. The direct product of
two left zero semigroups LZn, LZm is isomorphic to LZn·m. The direct product of
two rectangular bands RB(n, m), RB(n′, m′) is isomorphic to RB(nn′, mm′).
3. Remark that nontrivial direct products of free semigroups F Sn and free monoids
F Mn are not free.
4 Simplifications of terms
As we mentioned above, L-terms may be very complicated expressions. Fortunately, for
many varieties of algebras one can simplify term expressions.
Let V be a variety of L-algebras. L-terms t(X), s(X) are called equivalent over V if
the identity ∀x1∀x2 . . . ∀xn t(X) = s(X) holds in each algebra of V . Let us give examples
which show the simplification of terms in many varieties of algebras (in all examples below
terms depend on variables X = {x1, x2, . . . , xn}).
1. V =the variety of all semigroups. Since the multiplication is associative in every
semigroup, any Ls-term is equivalent over V to a term with no brackets:
xk1
i1 xk2
i2 . . . xkm
im (kj ∈ N).
(8)
2. V =the variety of all groups. Using the axioms of group theory, one can obtain
that every Lg-term is equivalent over V to a product of variables in integer powers
xk1
i1 xk2
i2 . . . xkm
im (kj ∈ Z).
(9)
3. V =the variety of all idempotent semigroups. Recall that a semigroup is idem-
potent if it satisfies the identity ∀x xx = x. Thus, any Ls-term is equivalent over V
to an expression of the form
xi1xi2 . . . xik .
(10)
4. V =the variety of all semilattices. Since a semilattice is a commutative idem-
potent semigroup, one can sort variables in (10) and obtain
xi1xi2 . . . xik (i1 < i2 < . . . < ik).
(11)
5. V =the variety of all rectangular band. Recall that a rectangular band is
an idempotent semigroup satisfying the identity ∀x∀y∀z (xyz = xz). Therefore
the expression (10) is equivalent over V to xi1xik . In other words, any Ls-term is
equivalent over V to a term in at most two letters.
8
6. V =the variety of all left zero semigroups. The identity ∀x∀y (xy = x) holds
in V . Thus, any Ls-term is equivalent over V to a term in one letter.
7. V =the variety of all abelian groups. It is directly checked that every L+g-term
is equivalent over V to an expression of the form
k1x1 + k2x2 + . . . + knxn,
(12)
where ki ∈ Z, and expressions kixi are defined as follows
kixi =
f n(x) =
xi + xi + . . . + xi
if ki > 0
−(xi + xi + . . . + xi
) if ki < 0
ki times
{z
}
ki times
0 if ki = 0
f (f (f (. . . (x)) . . .))
if n > 0
n-times
x ifn = 0
{z
{z
}
}
8. V =the variety of all unars. The language Lu has a very simple set of terms,
therefore we write only a compact form of Lu-terms:
5 Equations and solutions
An equation over a language L (L-equation) is an equality of two L-terms.
t(X) = s(X).
Remark 5.1.
atomicWikiformula of L.
According to model
theoryWiki, L-equation is actually an
A system of L-equations (L-system for shortness) is an arbitrary set of L-equations.
Notice that we shall consider only systems which depend on a finite set of variables X.
An L-system in variables X is denoted by S(X).
Let A be an L-algebra and S be an L-system in variables X = {x1, x2, . . . , xn}. A
point P = (p1, p2, . . . , pn) ∈ An is called a solution of S if the substitution xi = pi reduces
each equation of S to a true equality of A. Let us denote the set of all solutions of S in
A by VA(S(X)) ⊆ An.
If VA(S) = ∅ an L-system S is called inconsistent over A.
Proposition 5.2. For an L-algebra A and L-systems Si it holds:
1. S1 ⊇ S2 ⇒ VA(S1) ⊆ VA(S2);
2.
VA([i∈I
Si) =\i∈I
VA(Si)
Proof. Both statements immediately follows from a principle: “a big system has a small
solution set”.
An L-system S1 is equivalent over an L-algebra A to an L-system S2 if
and it is denoted by S1 ∼A S2.
VA(S1) = VA(S2),
9
5.1 Simplifications of equations
One can simplify equations in many classes of L-algebras.
1. Any Lg-equation t(X) = s(X) is equivalent over any group G to
w(X) = 1,
where w(X) = t(X)s−1(X).
Respectively, any L+g-equation is equivalent over an abelian group A to
k1x1 + k2x2 + . . . + knxn = 0.
2. By the definition, an equation over a semigroup S is an equality
t(X) = s(X),
(13)
(14)
(15)
where t(X), s(X) are semigroup terms (8). However, the equation (15) does not
always allow further simplifications. Nevertheless, for a commutative monoids with
cancellations any L+m-equation can be reduced to
Xi∈I
kixi =Xj∈J
kjxj,
(16)
where I, J ⊆ {1, 2, . . . , n}, and I ∩ J = ∅, i.e. there is not a variable occurring in
both parts of equation.
3. Any Lu-equation over an unar U is written as
f n(xi) = f m(xj),
(17)
xi, xj ∈ X.
If a function f is injective the equation (17) can be reduced to an expression of the
form
f k(xi) = xj.
(18)
Let us give examples of equations and their solutions over some algebraic structures.
1. Let us consider an equation xy = yx in the free semigroup F Sn (n > 1). By the
properties of F Sn, elements x, y ∈ F Sn commute iff x, y are powers of the same
element w ∈ F Sn. Thus,
VF Sn(xy = yx) = {(wk, wl) w ∈ F Sr, k, l > 0}
The solution set of xy = yx in the free monoid F Mn (n > 1) is
VF Mn(xy = yx) = {(wk, wl) w ∈ F Sr, k, l ≥ 0},
where the expression w0 equals 1.
2. Let S = RB(n, m) be a rectangular band. The solution set of an equation xy = y
in S is the following set of pairs {([t, t1], [t, t2]) 1 ≤ t ≤ n, 1 ≤ t1, t2 ≤ m}.
10
6 Algebraic sets and radicals
A set Y ⊆ An is called algebraic over an L-algebra A if there exists an L-system S in
variables X = {x1, x2, . . . , xn} such that VA(S) = Y .
Let us give examples and properties of algebraic sets.
1. An intersection of an arbitrary number of algebraic sets
Yi, Yi ⊆ An
Y =\i∈I
is algebraic over every L-algebra A.
Indeed, if each Yi is the solution set of an
L-system Si, then the system S =Si∈I Si has the solution set Y .
2. A set Y = An is algebraic over any L-algebra A and every natural n > 0. Indeed,
the L-system S = {xi = xi1 ≤ i ≤ n} has the solution set Y .
3. Let G be a group, and Yn = {g the orderWikiof g divides n} ⊆ G. The set Yn is
algebraic, since Yn = VG(xn = 1).
4. Every algebraic set Y ⊆ Gn over a group G contains the point en = (1, 1, . . . , 1),
since any equation w(X) = 1 satisfies en over the group G. Thus, the empty set is
not algebraic over any group G.
5. The set of idempotents E in an arbitrary semigroup S is algebraic, since E =
VS(x2 = x).
6. Let S be an idempotent semigroup (recall that left zero semigroups, semilattices and
rectangular bands are idempotent). Let us prove that every algebraic set Y ⊆ Sn
over a semigroup S contains the set of points {(a, a, . . . , a) a ∈ S}. Indeed, let us
consider an Ls-equation t(X) = s(X). The idempotency of S gives t(a, a, . . . , a) = a,
s(a, a, . . . , a) = a, therefore (a, a, . . . , a) ∈ VS(t(X) = s(X)). Thus, the point
(a, a, . . . , a) satisfies any Ls-system S, and every algebraic set Y should contain all
points of the form (a, a, . . . , a). Finally, we obtain that the empty set is not algebraic
set over any idempotent semigroup.
7. Left zero semigroups LZm have a simple structure, and we can explicitly describe
the whole class of algebraic sets over LZm. According to Section 4, any equation
over LZm is the equality of two variables xi = xj. Therefore, every Ls-system S in
variables X = {x1, x2, . . . , xn} over LZm is the set of equalities between variables of
X. Thus, for any pair of variables xi, xj it holds that either the values of xi and xj
coincide at any point of VLZm(S) or for all ai, aj ∈ LZm the set VLZm(S) contains
a point, where xi = ai, xj = aj.
Let Y be a subset of LZ n
to be algebraic. Let πij(Y ) ⊆ LZ 2
and j-th coordinates, i.e.
m. Using the reasonings above, we give conditions for Y
m denote the projection of the set Y onto the i-th
(ai, aj) ∈ πij(Y ) ⇔ (a1, a2, . . . , an) ∈ Y.
Thus, a set Y ⊆ LZ n
projection πij(Y ) is equal either LZ 2
m is algebraic over LZm iff for any pair 1 ≤ i 6= j ≤ n the
m or πij(Y ) = {(a, a) a ∈ LZm}.
8. The empty set is algebraic over the free unar F Un of rank n, since there exists an
inconsistent equation f (x) = x over F Un.
11
6.1 Radicals and congruent closures
Let Y ⊆ An be an algebraic set over an L-algebra A. The radical of Y is defined as
follows
RadA(Y ) = {t(X) = s(X)Y ⊆ VA(t(X) = s(X))}.
The radical of an L-system S over A is defined as the radical of the set VA(S):
RadA(S) = RadA(VA(S)).
Equations from the radical RadA(S) are called consequences of an L-system S.
Obviously, S ⊆ RadA(S) (a system S is a consequence of its equations) for any L-
algebra A. Moreover, any radical RadA(S) contains the following types of equations.
1. All equations obtained from equations of S by the transitive and symmetric closure
of the equality relation. For example, if t(X) = s(X) ∈ S then s(X) = t(X) ∈
RadA(S), and t(X) = s(X), s(X) = u(X) ∈ S imply t(X) = u(X) ∈ RadA(S).
2. All equations obtained from a functional composition of equations of S. For example,
for an Ls-system S = {t1(X) = s1(X), t2(X) = s2(X)} of semigroup equations the
equation t1(X) · t2(X) = s1(X) · s2(X) belongs to the radical RadS(S) over any
semigroup S.
Above we describe two types of elementary consequences of an L-system S. Such
equations form a main subset [S] of the radical RadA(S). Let us give a formal definition
of the set [S].
A set of L-equations [S] is a congruent closure of an L-system S, if [S] is the least set
containing S and satisfying the following axioms (below ti(X), si(X) are L-terms):
1. t1(X) = t1(X) ∈ [S] for every L-term t1(X);
2. if t1(X) = t2(X) ∈ [S] then t2(X) = t1(X) ∈ [S];
3. if t1(X) = t2(X) ∈ [S] and t2(X) = t3(X) ∈ [S] then t1(X) = t3(X) ∈ [S];
4. if ti(X) = si(X) ∈ [S] (1 ≤ i ≤ n) and L contains an n-ary functional symbol f (n)
then we have f (t1(X), t2(X), . . . , tn(X)) = f (s1(X), s2(X), . . . , sn(X)) ∈ [S].
It is easy to check that for any L-system S it holds the following inclusion
[S] ⊆ RadA(S).
(19)
The converse inclusion of (19) does not holds for many systems S and algebras A, since
the radical may contain nontrivial and unexpected equations. In the following examples
we find some equations which do not belong to congruent closures of given systems.
1. The radical of any system over an L-algebra A should contain all identities which
are true in A.
2. Let Z be the abelian group of integers. The radical of an L+g-equation nx = 0
(n ∈ N) contains the consequence x = 0. Obviously, in this example one can take
an arbitrary abelian group with no torsion instead of Z.
3. Let N be the monoid of natural numbers. The radical of the equation x + y = 0
contains x = 0, y = 0.
12
4. Let F Sr be the free semigroup of rank r. Let us consider a Ls-system S = {x1x2 =
x2x1, x2x3 = x3x2}. By the properties of free semilattices, elements x, y commute iff
x, y are powers of the same element w. Therefore, x1 = wn1, x2 = wn2, x3 = wn3 for
some w ∈ F Sr, and we obtain that the equation x1x3 = x3x1 belongs to the radical
of S.
However in the free monoid F Mr of rank r > 1 the equation x1x3 = x3x1 does not
belong to the radical of S, since (a1, 1, a2) ∈ VFr (S), but a1a2 6= a2a1, where ai are
free generators of F Mr.
5. The equation x1x3 = x2x3 over the free monoid F Mr
implies x1 = x2 ∈
RadF Mr(x1x3 = x2x3), since F Mr has cancellations.
6. The equation f (x) = f 2(y) over the free unar F Un deduces the equation x = f (y) ∈
RadF Un(f (x) = f 2(y)), since the unary function f is injective over the set F Un.
The following statement contain the list of all elementary properties of radicals.
Proposition 6.1. Let A be an L-algebra.
1. For algebraic sets Y1, Y2 it holds
Y1 ⊆ Y2 ⇒ RadA(Y1) ⊇ RadA(Y2).
(20)
In particular,
Y1 = Y2 ⇔ RadA(Y1) = RadA(Y2).
2. For L-systems S1, S2 we have
S1 ⊆ S2 ⇒ RadA(S1) ⊆ RadA(S2).
3. Suppose an algebraic set Y is a union of algebraic sets {Yi i ∈ I}, then
RadA(Y ) =[i∈I
RadA(Yi).
(21)
(22)
Proof. The first statement follows from the informal principle “a small set Y has a big
class of equations which satisfy all points of Y ”. The second statement immediately
follows from the first one.
from (20), therefore it is sufficient to prove the converse inclusion. Let t(X) = s(X) be an
L-equation from all radicals RadA(Yi) (i ∈ I). Therefore, we have Yi ⊆ VA(t(X) = s(X)),
Let us prove the third statement. The inclusion Rad(Y ) ⊆ Si∈I RadA(Yi) follows
and hence Y =Si∈I Yi ⊆ VA(t(X) = s(X)) or equivalently t(X) = s(X) ∈ RadA(Y ).
6.2
Irreducible algebraic sets
A nonempty algebraic set Y ⊆ An is irreducible if Y is not a finite union of algebraic sets
Y1 ∪ Y2 ∪ . . . ∪ Yk, Yi 6= Y.
Below we give examples of irreducible algebraic sets over different algebraic structures.
13
1. Let A = hA Li be a finite L-algebra and A = {a1, a2, . . . , an}. Any algebraic
set Y = Am for m > n is reducible.
Indeed, Y is the solution set of a system
S = {x1 = x1, x2 = x2, . . . , xm = xm}. Since the values of x1, x2, . . . , xm belong to
A, there exists a pair xi, xj with the same values at a given point. Thus, the set Y
is a union
VA(S ∪ {xi = xj}).
Y =[i6=j
2. Let Ln be a linear ordered semilattice and n > 1. Then
L2
n = VLn({x = x, y = y}) = VL(x ≤ y) ∪ VL(y ≤ x).
Remark that the set Ln = VLn(x = x) is irreducible.
3. Let S = RB(n, m) = {(i, j) 1 ≤ i ≤ n, 1 ≤ j ≤ m} be a rectangular band. Then
the algebraic set Y = Sl = VS(S) = VS(x1 = x1, x2 = x2, . . . , xl = xl) is reducible
for l > min(n, m). Let us prove this statement for min(n, m) = n.
There exists a pair xi, xj whose values have the same first coordinate in the presen-
tation of S. Thus, Y is a union
Y = [1≤i6=j≤n
VS(S ∪ {xixj = xj}).
4. Let F Mr be the free monoid of rank r > 1. Then the solution set of S = {xy =
yx, yz = zy} admits a presentation
VF Mr(S) = VF Mr(S ∪ {xz = zy}) ∪ VFr (S ∪ {y = 1}).
(see Section 5.1 for details).
Remark that S has the irreducible solution set over the free semigroup F Sr (see
Section 11 for the proof).
There are algebraic structures, where every nonempty algebraic set is irreducible (fol-
lowing [4], such algebraic structures are called co-domains, and we study their properties
in Section 12).
7 Equationally Noetherian algebras
An L-algebra A is equationally Noetherian if any infinite L-system S is equivalent over A
to some finite subsystem S′ ⊆ S.
Remark 7.1. By the definition, any infinite inconsistent system S over an equationally
Noetherian L-algebra A should contain a finite inconsistent subsystem S′. However, the
property “any consistent system S is equivalent to some finite subsystem S′ ⊆ S” is not
equivalent to the definition of equationally Noetherian algebra (see the definition of the
class Nc in Section 19).
For equationally Noetherian algebras we have the following criterion (its proof is easily
deduced from the definition of equationally Noetherian algebras).
Proposition 7.2. An L-algebra A is equationally Noetherian iff for each n > 1 the set
An does not contain an infinite chain of algebraic sets
Y1 ⊃ Y2 ⊃ . . . ⊃ Yn ⊃ . . .
14
In examples below of equationally Noetherian algebras we use the following obvious
fact: any subalgebra A of an equationally Noetherian L-algebra B is equationally Noethe-
rian.
1. Any finite L-algebra A is equationally Noetherian. Indeed, the solution set of ev-
ery L-system S is finite, so there is not any infinite chain of algebraic sets, and
Proposition 7.2 concludes the proof.
2. Any L-algebra A from a locally finite variety V is equationally Noetherian. In this
case the free algebra F (X) in V generated by X = {x1, x2, . . . , xn} is finite. Since
one can consider any L-term as an element of F (X), the set of different terms is
finite. Therefore, the number of all nonequivalent equations are also finite and there
is not any infinite L-system over A.
3. By the previous item, all semilattices, rectangular bands and left zero semigroups
are equationally Noetherian.
4. Each abelian group is equationally Noetherian. Let us explain this statement by the
following example. Let us consider an infinite L+g-system
x + 2y = 0,
3x + 4y = 0,
5x + 6y = 0,
. . .
(2i + 1)x + (2i + 2)y = 0,
. . .
S =
S1 =
x + 2y = 0,
2y = 0,
4y = 0,
. . .
(2i)y = 0,
. . .
over an abelian group A. By the Gauss elimination process, one can reduce S to
an upper triangular form as follows. Multiplying the first equations on 2i + 1 and
subtracting the i-th equation from the first one, we obtain the following system of
equations
Since there exist abelian groups where the equation (2i)y = 0 do not imply y = 0,
the system S1 is not necessarily equivalent to {x + 2y = 0, y = 0}. However abelian
group theory states that a system of the form Sx = {n1x = 0, n2x = 0, n3x = 0, . . .}
is equivalent to an equation nx = 0, where n is the greatest common divisor of
n1, n2, n3, . . .. By the properties of the greatest common divisor, there exists a
number k such that gcd(n1, n2, . . . , nk) = gcd(n1, n2, . . .). Therefore the system Sx
is equivalent to its finite subsystem {n1x = 0, n2x = 0,
. . . nkx = 0}. Thus, the
system S1 is equivalent to its finite subsystem S′
1 = {x + 2y = 0, 2y = 0}. Replacing
all equations of S′
2 to the corresponding equations of the original system S, we obtain
a finite subsystem S′ = {x + 2y = 0, 3x + 4y = 0} ⊆ S with S′ ∼A S.
15
5. Every commutative monoid M with cancellations is equationally Noetherian. By
semigroup theory, such monoids are embedded into abelian groups. Since all abelian
groups are equationally Noetherian (see above), each submonoid of an abelian group
is also equationally Noetherian.
6. Any group isomorphic to a group of invertible matrices relative to the operation
of matrix multiplication (following group theory, such groups are called linear) is
equationally Noetherian. Let us prove this statement for a group G of 2×2-matrices
with entries in a field F .
Let S be an arbitrary system in variables x1, x2, . . . , xn. Since elements of G are
2 × 2-matrices, we put
xi = x(1)
x(3)
i
i
i
i !
x(2)
x(4)
for some x(j)
i ∈ F . The identity of G is the identity matrix
1 =(cid:18)1 0
0 1(cid:19)
Replacing all variables in S to their matrix presentations and computing all multi-
plications and inverse elements, we obtain a system of polynomial equations Spoly
over the field F . For example, the group equation xixj = 1 is equivalent to the
following polynomial system
i
x(3)
xixj = 1 ⇒ x(1)
x(1)
j + x(2)
j + x(4)
i x(1)
x(3)
i x(1)
i x(3)
i x(3)
j
j
i
x(1)
i x(1)
x(1)
i x(2)
x(3)
i x(1)
x(3)
i x(2)
j + x(2)
j + x(2)
j + x(4)
j + x(4)
i x(3)
i x(4)
i x(3)
i x(4)
j = 1,
j = 0,
j = 1,
j = 0
i
i ! x(1)
x(2)
x(4)
x(3)
j
j
x(1)
i x(2)
x(3)
i x(2)
j + x(2)
j + x(4)
i x(4)
i x(4)
j
x(2)
x(4)
j ! =(cid:18)1 0
0 1(cid:19) ⇒
0 1(cid:19) ⇒
j ! =(cid:18)1 0
j
According to commutative algebra (Hilbert‘s basic theoremWiki), the system of poly-
nomial equations Spoly is equivalent over the field F to its finite subsystem S′
poly.
Applying inverse transformations to S′
poly, one can obtain a system of group equa-
tions S′ with S′ ∼G S.
7. Let us prove that the free monoids F Mn are equationally Noetherian. We need the
following facts about the theory of the free groupWiki. It is known that the free group
F Gn of rank n contains (as a submonoid) the free monoid of rank n, and moreover
all free groups F Gn are embedded into the free group F G2 of rank 2. Thus, F G2
contains a submonoid F Mn of an arbitrary finite rank n and it is sufficient to prove
that F G2 is equationally Noetherian.
By the Sanov theoremWikithere exists a presentation of the free generators a1, a2 of
F G2 by the following matrices
2 1(cid:19) .
0 1(cid:19) , (cid:18)1 0
(cid:18)1 2
16
Thus, the group F G2 is linear and by the previous statement F G2 is equationally
Noetherian. Remark that we actually prove that all free groups are equationally
Noetherian.
8. Let us show that the free unar F Un of rank n is equationally Noetherian. Since
any equation over F Un contains at most two variables, every system S in variables
X = {x1, x2, . . . , xm} is a union
S = [1≤i≤j≤m
Sij,
where the system Sij depends only on the variables xi, xj. It is sufficient to prove
that each Sij is equivalent to a finite subsystem.
According to (18), each equation of Sij has the form f k(xi) = xj. Suppose Sij is
infinite. Let us consider all possible cases if Sij contains the following equations.
(a) If f k(xi) = xj, f l(xi) = xj ∈ Sij (k < l) then
f k(xi) = f l(xi) ∈ RadF Un(Sij) ⇔ f l−k(xi) = xi ∈ RadF Un(Sij).
(b) If f k(xi) = xj, xi = f l(xj) ∈ Sij (k < l) we have
f k+l(xj) = xj ∈ RadF Un(Sij).
In both cases the last equation is inconsistent in the free unar, Sij is also inconsistent
and it is equivalent to the given two equations.
There are algebras which are not equationally Noetherian.
1. Following [64], let us consider a monoid with the presentation B = ha, b ab = 1i.
The monoid B is called the bicyclic, and each element s ∈ B is a product of the form
s = bnam (m, n ∈ N). The multiplication in B is defined as follows
bn1am1bn2am2 =(bn1+n2−m1am2, if m1 ≤ n2
bn1am1−n2+m2, otherwise
The elements bnan are idempotents of B:
(bnan)(bnan) = bn(anbn)an = bn1an = bnan.
Let us consider an infinite system of equations
xyz = z,
x2y2z = z,
x3y3z = z,
. . .
S =
Let us assume that S is equivalent over B to a finite subsystem S′. Without loss of
generality, we put S′ = {xiyiz = z 1 ≤ i ≤ n}. The system S′ satisfies the point
(b, a, bnan):
biaibnan = bi(aibn)an = bibn−ian = bnan.
However (b, a, bnan) /∈ VB(xn+1yn+1z = z):
bn+1an+1bnan = bn+1(an+1bn)an = bn+1a1an = bn+1an+1 6= bnan.
Thus, (b, a, bnan) /∈ VB(S), and we obtain S ≁B S′, a contradiction.
17
2. Let Lu∞ = {f (1)
i ∈ N} be a language of a countable number of unary functional
symbols, and A be an Lu∞-algebra with the universe N (natural numbers) and the
functions fi are defined in A as follows
i
f A
i (x) =(0, if x = i
x, otherwise
Let us consider an infinite system S = {fi(x) = x i ∈ N}. By the definition of the
functions fi it follows VA(S) = {0}. However, any finite subsystem S′ = {fi(x) =
x 1 ≤ i ≤ n} has the nonempty solution set VA(S′) = {i i > n}.
3. Following [64], any finitely generated non-hopfianWikigroup is not equationally
Noetherian. In particular, the well-know Baumslag-Solitar group B(2, 3) = ha, b
a−1b2a = b3i is not equationally Noetherian.
For the class of equationally Noetherian algebras we have the following statements.
1. Any subalgebra of an equationally Noetherian L-algebra A is also equationally
Noetherian (we used this property above many times).
2. An arbitrary direct power of an equationally Noetherian L-algebra A is equationally
Noetherian.
3. A finite direct product of equationally Noetherian algebras is also equationally
Noetherian.
The class of equationally Noetherian algebras is not closed under the following oper-
ations.
1. An infinite direct product of equationally Noetherian algebras is not always equa-
In [73] it was defined an example of infinite direct product
tionally Noetherian.
S = Qi Si of equationally Noetherian semigroups Si such that S is not equation-
ally Noetherian. Below we consider a simpler example of a direct product of linear
ordered semilattices in a non-standard language.
Let Ls∞ = {·, c1, c2, . . . , cn, . . .} be a semigroup language extended by a countable
set of constants ci. Let An = h{1, 2, . . . , n} Li be an Ls∞-algebra such that
x · y = min{x, y} and the constants are defined in A as follows
cAn
i =(i if i ≤ n
n otherwise
Obviously, An is a linear ordered semilattice. Since all An are finite, they are
equationally Noetherian.
Let A denote the direct product Q∞
constant symbol cn has an interpretation in A as follows
i=1 Ai. By the definition of a direct product, a
cA
n = (1, 2, 3, . . . , n, n, . . . , n, . . .).
According to the definition of a partial order, we have the following chain of con-
stants
cA
1 < cA
2 < . . . < cA
n < . . .
18
n n ≥ 1} over A. Let S′ be a finite
Let us consider an infinite system S = {x ≥ cA
subsystem of S. Without loss of generality one can assume that S′ = {x ≥ cn
N is a solution of S′, however
1 ≤ n ≤ N}. It is directly checked that the point cA
N /∈ VA(S). Thus, S′ ≁A S, and A is not equationally Noetherian.
cA
N (cid:3) cA
N +1, i.e. cA
2. A homomorphic image of an equationally Noetherian algebra is not always equa-
tionally Noetherian. The Baumslag-Solitar group B(2, 3) is a homomorphic image
of the equationally Noetherian free group F G2 of rank 2 (by group theory, any two-
generated group is a homomorphic image of F G2), but above we showed B(2, 3) is
not equationally Noetherian.
An algebraic set Y over an L-algebra A can be decomposed into a union of other
algebraic sets Y = Y1 ∪ Y2 ∪ . . . ∪ Yn, and one can iterate this process for each Yi, ets...
This process may be finite (if we shall obtain a decomposition of Y into a finite union of
irreducible sets) or infinite. The equationally Noetherian property provides the finiteness
of the process.
Theorem 7.3.
over A admits a decomposition
If an L-algebra A is equationally Noetherian, then any algebraic set Y
Y = Y1 ∪ Y2 ∪ . . . ∪ Ym,
(23)
where Yi are irreducible, Yi * Yj (i 6= j), and this decomposition is unique up to permu-
tations of Yi.
The algebraic sets Yi from Theorem 7.3 are called irreducible components of Y .
Remark 7.4. Let us prove that the converse statement of Theorem 7.3 does not hold.
It is sufficient to define an L-algebra B such that B is not equationally Noetherian and
all nonempty algebraic sets over B are irreducible (in this case the decomposition (23)
obviously holds for B).
Algebras with no nonempty reducible sets are called co-domains (see Section 12).
Thus, B should be a co-domain. According to the results of Section 12, an infinite direct
i=1 A of an arbitrary L-algebra A is co-domain. Taking a non-equationally
power B =Q∞
Noetherian algebra A, we obtain B with required properties.
7.1 Comments
Firstly, let us show the terminology difference. In B. Plotkin‘s papers [93, 94, 95] equation-
ally Noetherian algebras are called logically Noetherian, and in [63, 64, 73] the equationally
Noetherian property is called the Compacteness property.
In [2] there is a list of equationally Noetherian algebras. For example, the following
algebras are equationally Noetherian
• any Noetherian commutative ring R (a ring R is called Noetherian if it does not
contain infinite ascending chains of ideals);
• any torsion-free hyperbolic group [127];
• any free solvable group [59];
• any finitely generated metabelian (nilpotent) Lie algebra [42];
19
• since any linear group is equationally Noetherian (see above), any polycyclic and
any finitely generated metabelian group is equationally Noetherian [26, 29, 57].
Moreover, the paper [116] is devoted to the Noetherian property of the universal en-
veloping algebras; in [63] there were described equationally Noetherian completely simple
semigroups.
On the other hand, the following algebras are not equationally Noetherian (see [2] for
the complete list of such algebras):
• infinitely generated nilpotent groups [89];
• the wreath product A ≀ B of a non-abelian group A and infinite group B [28];
• the min-max algebras MR = hR; max, min, ·, +, −, 0, 1i and MN = hN; max, min,
+, 0, 1i [49];
• finitely generated semigroups with an infinite descending chains of idempotents (in
particular, all free inverse semigroups) [64].
One can recommend the book [73] which contains many examples of (non-) equation-
ally Noetherian semigroups.
Nevertheless there are many open problems in this area. Let us formulate only two of
them.
Problem. Is the free product of two equationally Noetherian groups equationally Noethe-
rian?
Problem.
free Lie algebra) is equationally Noetherian?
Is the free anti-commutative (respectively, the free associative algebra, the
8 Coordinate algebras
By the definition, the set of all L-terms is closed under compositions of all functional
symbols of the language L. Thus, the set of all L-terms in variables X is an L-algebra
which is denoted by TL(X) and called the the termal L-algebra generated by X.
Let Y be an algebraic set over an L-algebra A and Y is defined by an L-system in
variables X. Let us define an equivalence relation ∼Y over TL(X) as follows:
t(X) ∼Y s(X) ⇔ t(P ) = s(P ) for each point P ∈ Y ⇔ t(X) = s(X) ∈ RadA(Y ).
Let [t(X)]Y denote the equivalence class of a term t(X) relative to the relation ∼Y .
The family of all equivalence classes
ΓA(Y ) = T (X)/ ∼Y
is called the coordinate L-algebra of an algebraic set Y (precisely, ΓA(Y ) is a factor-
algebraWikiof T (X) by the relation ∼Y ). The result of an n-ary function f over an
L-algebra ΓA(Y ) is defined as follows
f ([t1(X)]Y , [t2(X)]Y , . . . , [tn(X)]Y ) = [f (t1(X), t2(X), . . . , tn(X))]Y .
For example, if L contains a binary functional symbol ·, the result of the function · in
ΓA(Y ) is [t(X)]Y · [s(X)]Y = [t(X) · s(X)]Y .
Remark 8.1. Let I be the set of all identities which hold in an L-algebra A. Since the
radical of any algebraic set Y ⊆ An contains all identities from I, the coordinate algebra
20
of Y satisfies all identities of I A. In particular, the coordinate algebra of an algebraic
set over a group (semigroup, unar) is always a group (respectively, semigroup, unar).
According to the definition, the coordinate algebra of an algebraic set Y ⊆ An defined
by a system in variables X admits a presentation
ΓA(Y ) = hX RadA(Y )i.
(24)
By (24) it follows that any coordinate algebra is finitely generated.
Let us compute coordinate algebras for some algebraic sets.
1. Suppose Y = ∅ is an algebraic set over an L-algebra A, and Y is defined by an
L-system S in variables X. Obviously, arbitrary terms t(X), s(X) has equal values
It follows that the relation ∼∅ defines a unique
at each point of the empty set.
equivalence class in TL(X). Therefore, the factor-algebra ΓA(∅) consists of a single
element. In other words, the algebra ΓA(∅) is trivial.
2. Let us consider a system of equations S = {2x + z = y + u, x + u = 3y + z} over the
commutative monoid of natural numbers N and denote Y = VN(S). Subtracting
from the first equation the second one, we obtain the equation x + 2y = 0 which is
obviously belongs to the radical of S. From the last equation it follows x = 0, y = 0 ∈
RadN(Y ). Applying x = 0, y = 0, to the equations of S, we have z = u ∈ RadA(Y ).
Since the substitutions x := 0, y := 0, z := u reduce the system S to trivial equalities,
the radical of Y is generated by the equations x = 0, y = 0, z = u. Therefore
ΓN(Y ) ∼= hx, y, z, u x = 0, y = 0, z = ui ∼= hui ∼= N
3. Let A be a torsion-free abelian group, and Y be an arbitrary algebraic set over A.
By Remark 8.1, the coordinate group ΓA(Y ) is an abelian group. Suppose that
ΓA(Y ) has a nontrivial torsion, i.e. there exists a nonzero element γ ∈ ΓA(Y ) with
nγ = 0 for some n ∈ N. By the definition of a coordinate group, there exists
an L+g-term t(X) such that γ = [t(X)]Y and nt(X) = 0 ∈ RadA(Y ). Since the
equality nt(X) = 0 implies t(X) = 0 in any torsion-free group, we have γ = [0], a
contradiction.
Thus, we proved that all coordinate groups over an abelian torsion-free group A
have not torsion subgroups. Since the coordinate group ΓA(Y ) is always finitely
generated, the group ΓA(Y ) is isomorphic to Zn for some n ∈ N (here we apply the
decomposition (7)).
Proposition 8.2. A group G is the coordinate group of an algebraic set over an
abelian torsion-free group iff G is isomorphic to Zn.
Proof. The “only if” statement was proved above. Let us prove the “if” part of
the theorem: one should prove that Zn is isomorphic to a coordinate group of some
algebraic set over A. Let us consider an algebraic set Y = An = VA({x1 = x1, x2 =
x2, . . . , xn = xn}). Its coordinate group is
ΓA(Y ) = hx1, x2, . . . , xn xi = xii ∼= hx1, x2, . . . , xni ∼= Zn.
21
4. Let F Mr be the free monoid of rank r > 1. The coordinate monoid of the algebraic
set Y = VF Mr(xy = yx) is the monoid with two generators x, y and x commutes
with y. Thus, ΓF Mr(Y ) is isomorphic to the commutative free monoid of rank 2:
ΓF Mr(Y ) ∼= N2.
5. Let us consider the equation f (x) = f 2(y) over the free unar F Ur. Since the function
f is injective on F Ur, we have x = f (y) ∈ RadF Ur(f (x) = f 2(y)). Therefore the
coordinate unar of the algebraic set Y = VF Ur(f (x) = f 2(y)) has the presentation
ΓF Un(Y ) ∼= hx, y x = f (y)i ∼= hyi ∼= F U1.
There exist distinct algebraic sets Y ⊆ An, Z ⊆ Am with isomorphic coordinate alge-
bras. Indeed, the algebraic sets
Y = A = VZ(x = x), Z = VZ({x = x, y = x}) ⊆ Z2
over the abelian group Z has the following coordinate groups
ΓZ(Y ) = hx RadZ(x = x)i ∼= Z.
ΓZ(Z) = hx, y RadZ(x = x, y = x)i ∼= hx RadZ(x = x)i ∼= Z.
Algebraic sets with isomorphic coordinate algebras were described in [1]. Precisely, it
was defined the notion of an isomorphism of algebraic sets (see [1] for more details) and
proved the following statement.
Proposition 8.3. Algebraic sets Y ⊆ An, Z ⊆ Am have isomorphic coordinate algebras
iff the sets Y, Z are isomorphic. Moreover, an irreducible algebraic set is isomorphic only
to irreducible algebraic sets.
The coordinate algebra of an irreducible algebraic set is called irreducible. By Propo-
sition 8.3, this definition is well-defined.
9 Main problems of universal algebraic geometry
Now we are able to explain the problems studied in universal algebraic geometry. For a
fixed L-algebra A one can pose the following problems.
1. Describe all algebraic sets over A. When a given set Y ⊆ An is algebraic over A?
What are irreducible sets over A?
2. Describe all coordinate algebras over A. When a given L-algebra B is isomorphic to
the coordinate algebra of some algebraic set over A? What are irreducible coordinate
algebras over A?
Actually, the first problem is complicated and it is completely solved only for algebras
A of a simple structure (for example, in Section 6 we completely describe algebraic sets
over left zero semigroups).
The second problem is simpler than the first one, since the description of coordinate
algebras gives the description of algebraic sets up to isomorphism. However, this problem
can be solved for a wide class of algebras, and in the next sections we shall study only
coordinate algebras.
22
10 Properties of coordinate algebras
Let Γ = ΓA(Y ) be the coordinate algebra of an algebraic set over an L-algebra A, and
φ : Γ → A be a homomorphism between Γ and A. By (24), we may assume that Γ
has a presentation hX RadA(Y )i, where X = {x1, x2, . . . , xn} is the generating set
of Γ. The homomorphism φ should map each xi into an element of A, and the vector
(x1, x2, . . . , xn) is mapped into a point P = (φ(x1), φ(x2), . . . , φ(xn)) ∈ An. Since φ
should preserve all relation RadA(Y ) of Γ, we obtain that the point P should satisfy all
equations from RadA(Y ) and therefore P ∈ Y . Thus, we proved that any homomorphism
between L-algebras Γ, A is actually a substitution xi 7→ pi of coordinates of some point
P = (p1, p2, . . . , pn) ∈ Y . This fact can be written in the following form
φ([t(X)]Y ) = t(P )
(25)
A homomorphism φ : B → A of the type (25) is denoted below by φP .
An L-algebra A approximates an L-algebra B if for an arbitrary pair of distinct ele-
ments b1, b2 ∈ B there exists a homomorphism φ : B → A such that φ(b1) 6= φ(b2).
A finitely generated L-algebra B is the coordinate L-algebra of a
Theorem 10.1.
nonempty algebraic set Y over an L-algebra A iff B is approximated by A.
Proof. Let us prove the “only if” part of the theorem. Suppose B ∼= ΓA(Y ) for some
algebraic set Y over A, and [t(X)]Y , [s(X)]Y are distinct elements of B. Since the terms
t(X), s(X) are not ∼Y -equivalent, there exists a point P ∈ Y with t(P ) 6= s(P ). Thus, the
homomorphism φP gives φP ([t(X)]Y ) 6= φP ([s(X)]Y ), and the algebra B is approximated
by A.
Let us prove the “if” part of the statement. Suppose that a finitely generated L-
algebra B has a presentation hX Ri, where X = {x1, x2, . . . , xn} is the set of generators
and R = {ti(X) = si(X) i ∈ I} are defining relations. One can consider R as an
L-system over an L-algebra A.
The images of homomorphisms φ ∈ Hom(B, A) are the subset in An:
Y = {(φ(x1), φ(x2), . . . , φ(xn)) φ ∈ Hom(B, A)}.
A map φ : B → A is a homomorphism of B iff φ preserves all defining relations R, or
equivalently (φ(x1), φ(x2), . . . , φ(xn)) ∈ VA(R). Thus, Y = VA(R), i.e. Y is an algebraic
It is sufficient to prove that B is the coordinate algebra of the set Y . According
set.
to (24), one should prove the equality of the sets [R] = RadA(Y ).
Since Y = VA(R), for any t(X) = s(X) ∈ [R] it holds Y ⊆ VA(t(X) = s(X)),
therefore t(X) = s(X) ∈ RadA(Y ). Let us prove the converse inclusion RadA(Y ) ⊆ [R].
Assume there exists an equation t(X) = s(X) ∈ RadA(Y ) \ [R].
It follows that the
elements t(X), s(X) are distinct in the algebra B, but t(P ) = s(P ) for all P ∈ Y . By the
definition of the set Y , we have φ(t(X)) = φ(s(X)) for any homomorphism φ : B → A.
Thus, we obtain a contradiction, since B is approximated by A.
Let us apply Theorem 10.1 to various algebras.
1. Let A = Zpn be the cyclic group of order pn for a prime p. Let us find all coordinate
groups of algebraic sets over A. The list of nontrivial subgroup of A is Sub(A) =
{Zpm 1 ≤ m ≤ n}. Obviously, each group from Sub(A) is approximated by A,
therefore all groups {Zpm m ≤ n} are coordinate groups of algebraic sets over A.
23
Let is prove that any direct sum of groups from Sub(A) is also a coordinate group
over A. Let
B =
Zpni ,
m
Mi=1
where 1 ≤ ni ≤ n, and we allow ni = nj for distinct i, j. Therefore the elements
b, b′ ∈ B, b 6= b′ admit unique presentations as the following sums
b = b1 + b2 + . . . + bm, b′ = b′
1 + b′
2 + . . . + b′
m,
i ∈ Zpni . Since b 6= b′, there exists a number i such that bi 6= b′
where bi, b′
the projection πi of B onto the subgroup Zpni ⊆ A gives πi(bi) 6= πi(b′
approximated by A.
i. Then
i), and B is
Thus, we proved that the group B is the coordinate group of some algebraic set Y
over A. Moreover, one can write a system of equations S such that ΓA(VA(S)) ∼= B.
Indeed, for
S =
{pnixi = 0},
m
[i=1
the coordinate group of the set Y = VA(S) has the presentation
ΓA(Y ) = hx1, x2, . . . , xm pnixi = 0i (1 ≤ i ≤ m),
and we obtain ΓA(Y ) ∼= B.
Let us consider groups which are not coordinate groups over A = Zpn (below we
shall use the results of Section 3 about homomorphisms of abelian groups).
(a) Let B = Z. Any homomorphism φ ∈ Hom(B, A) maps the element pn ∈
Z in 0 ∈ Zpn, hence the group A does not approximate B (there is not a
homomorphism ψ ∈ Hom(B, A) with ψ(0) 6= ψ(pn)).
(b) Let B = Zqm, where q is prime and q 6= p. The set of homomorphisms
Hom(B, A) contains only the trivial homomorphism φ(x) = 0 for all x ∈ Zqm.
Obviously, such group B is not approximated by A.
(c) Suppose B = Zpm, where m > n. Each homomorphism φ ∈ Hom(B, A) maps
pn ∈ Zpm in the zero of Zpn. Thus, the group A does not approximate B, since
there is not a homomorphism ψ ∈ Hom(B, A) with ψ(0) 6= ψ(pn).
The obtained results allow us to formulate the following proposition.
Let Sub(A) = {Zpk 1 ≤ k ≤ n} be the set of all nonzero
Proposition 10.2.
subgroups of the group A = Zpn for a prime p. An abelian group B is the coordinate
group of a nonempty algebraic set over A iff B is a direct sum of a finite number of
groups from Sub(A).
In Theorem 10.6 we shall prove Proposition 10.2 for any finitely generated abelian
group A.
2. Let A = LZn = {a1, a2, . . . , an} be a left zero semigroup consisting of n > 1
elements. Let us show that an arbitrary finite left zero semigroup B = LZm =
24
{b1, b2, . . . , bm} is the coordinate semigroup of some nonempty algebraic set over A.
Let bi, bj be two distinct elements of B. Then the homomorphism
φ(b) =(a1, if b = bi
a2, otherwise
satisfies φ(bi) 6= φ(bj). Thus, the semigroup B is approximated by A and by Theo-
rem 10.1 B is the coordinate semigroup of a nonempty algebraic set over A.
3. Let A = RB(n, m) be a rectangular band. If n = 1 (m = 1) the semigroup A is a left
(respectively, right) zero semigroup and its coordinate semigroups were described
above. Thus, we assume n, m > 1. Let us show that an arbitrary finite rectangular
band B = RB(n′, m′) is the coordinate semigroup of a nonempty algebraic set over
A. Without loss of generality one can assume A = RB(2, 2). Let b1 = (i1, j1),
b2 = (i2, j2) be two distinct elements of B, and i1 6= i2 (similarly one can consider
the case j1 6= j2). It is directly checked that the map
φ((i, j)) =((1, 1), if i = i1
(1, 2), otherwise
is a homomorphism and φ(b1) = (1, 1) 6= (1, 2) = φ(b2). Thus, the semigroup B is
approximated by A, therefore B is the coordinate band of an algebraic set over A.
4. Let A = L2 be a linear ordered semilattice consisting of the elements 0, 1. Let
us show that an arbitrary finite semilattice B is the coordinate semilattice of a
nonempty algebraic set over A.
Let us consider two distinct elements b1, b2 ∈ B. One can assume b2 (cid:2) b1 (otherwise,
we assign b1 := b2, b2 := b1 and obtain the condition b2 (cid:2) b1). Let us define a map
φ : B → A:
φ(b) =(1, if b ≥ b2,
0 otherwise
Let us prove the map φ is a homomorphism of B. Assume the converse: φ(xy) 6=
φ(x)φ(y) for some x, y ∈ B. We have the following cases:
(a) φ(xy) = 0, φ(x) = φ(y) = 1;
(b) φ(xy) = 1, φ(x) = 0;
(c) φ(xy) = 1, φ(y) = 0.
In the first case we have b2 ≤ x, b2 ≤ y. Therefore, b2 ≤ xy, and the definition of φ
gives φ(xy) = 1, a contradiction. In the second case we obtain xy ≥ b2 that implies
x ≥ b2, and the definition of ψ gives φ(x) = 1, a contradiction. The proof of the
third case is similar to the second one.
Thus, φ ∈ Hom(B, A) and φ(b1) 6= φ(b2). We have that B is approximated by L2.
Since each nontrivial semilattice A contains L2 as a subsemilattice, we obtain the
following statement.
Theorem 10.3.
nonempty algebraic set over a nontrivial semilattice A.
Any finite semilattice B is the coordinate semilattice of a
25
5. Let us describe the coordinate unars of algebraic sets of nonempty algebraic sets
over the free unar A = F Un of rank n. Let us consider a finitely generated unar B
with the set of generators b1, b2, . . . , bm. Therefore, each element b ∈ B is equal to
an expression b = f k(bi) for some numbers i, k.
If there exists numbers i, k such that f k(bi) = bi then the set of homomorphisms
Hom(B, A) is empty (it is impossible to map bi into A, since there is not any element
a ∈ A with f k(a) = a). Therefore, B is not a coordinate unar of a nonempty
algebraic set over A.
Thus, for any i all elements in sequence bi, f (bi), f 2(bi), . . . are different. Moreover,
one can assume there are not generators bi, bj with f k(bi) = bj (otherwise,one can
remove bj from the set of generators).
Assume there exist different elements b, b′ ∈ B such that f (b) = f (b′). In this case
any homomorphism φ ∈ Hom(B, A) gives φ(b) = φ(b′), since f is injective on A.
Thus, B is not approximated by A in this case.
Finally, we have all elements of the set {f k(bi)} (k ∈ N, 1 ≤ i ≤ m) are pairwise
distinct, and it follows that the unar B is isomorphic to the free unar of rank m.
Thus, we obtain the following statement.
Theorem 10.4. A finitely generated unar B is the coordinate unar of a nonempty
algebraic set over A = F Un (n ≥ 1) iff B ∼= F Um for some m ≥ 1.
Proof. The “only if” part of the statement was proved above. Let us prove the
“if” part. Let B = F Um, where B is freely generated by the set of generators
b1, b2, . . . , bm, and a1 be an arbitrary free generator of A. Let us take two different
elements b, b′ ∈ B. If b = f k(bi), b′ = f k′(bi) (i.e. b, b′ lies in the same subunar
F U1 ⊆ B generated by the element bi), then the homomorphism
has the property
φ(bj) = a1 for all 1 ≤ j ≤ m
φ(b) = f k(a1) 6= f k′
(a1) = φ(b′).
In the case of b = f k(bi), b = f k′(bi′), the homomorphism φ is defined as follows
if k 6= k′, and
φ(bj) = a1,
φ(bj) =(a1, if j 6= i′
f (a1), otherwise j = i′
if k = k′. One can directly check that φ(b) 6= φ(b′).
Thus, we proved the unar B is approximated by A, and according to Theorem 10.1
B is the coordinate unar of a nonempty algebraic set over A.
One can describe coordinate algebras with embeddings.
Theorem 10.5. An L-algebra B is the coordinate L-algebra of a nonempty algebraic
set over an L-algebra A iff B is embedded into a direct power of A.
26
Proof. Let us prove the “only if” part of the statement. Suppose B ∼= ΓA(Y ) for some
algebraic set Y over the L-algebra A. For each b ∈ B let us define a vector v(b) such that
1. coordinates of v(b) are indexed by points P ∈ Y ;
2. the value of the P -th coordinate is φP (b).
By Theorem 10.1, B is approximated by A, i.e.
for any pair b1, b2 ∈ B there exists a
homomorphism φP with φP (b1) 6= φP (b2). Thus, the vectors v(b1), v(b2) are distinct in
the P -th coordinate, and the map v is an embedding of B into a direct power of A.
Let us prove the “if” of the theorem. According to Theorem 10.1, it is sufficient to
prove that each subalgebra of a direct power Qi∈I A is approximated by A. Let
¯b1 = (b11, b12, . . . , b1n, . . .), ¯b2 = (b21, b22, . . . , b2n, . . .)
be two distinct elements a direct power of A (bij ∈ A). Therefore there exists a coordinate
with index j such that b1j 6= b2j. The projection
A → A
πj : Yi∈I
of a direct power onto the j-th coordinate is a homomorphism, and πj(¯b1) 6= πj(¯b2). Thus,
any subalgebra of a direct power of A is approximated by A.
Let us apply Theorem 10.5 for descriptions of coordinate algebras.
1. Theorem 10.5 allows us to describe the coordinate groups of algebraic sets over a
finitely generated abelian group A. According to theory of abelian groups, a group
A is a direct sum (7). Let Sub⊕(A) denote the set of all nonzero subgroups of all
direct summands of A. For example, the group
A = Z ⊕ Z ⊕ Z8 ⊕ Z3 ⊕ Z3
(26)
gives Sub⊕(A) = {Z, Z8, Z4, Z2, Z3}. The following result holds.
Theorem 10.6. A finitely generated group B is the coordinate group of a nonzero
algebraic set over an abelian group A iff B is isomorphic to a finite direct sum of
groups from Sub⊕(A).
Proof. Let us explain the idea of the proof at the group A given by (26). By
Theorem 10.5, the group B = Z8 ⊕Z8 ⊕Z8 is coordinate over A, since B is embedded
into the direct power A ⊕ A ⊕ A. Similarly, one can embed into a direct power of
A any sum of groups from Sub⊕(A).
If a group B has a direct summand G /∈ Sub⊕(A) in its presentation (7), the
subgroup G is not embeddable into any direct power of A. For example, the group
B = Z ⊕ Z9 contain the subgroup Z9 which is not embedded into direct powers of
A. Thus, B is not a coordinate group over A.
2. Applying Theorems 10.3 and 10.5, one can obtain the well-known result in semilat-
tice theory.
Proposition 10.7.
infinite semilattices) semilattice B is embedded into a direct power of L2 = {0, 1}.
Any finite (actually, one can prove this statement also for
27
3. Let A = N be the additive monoid of natural numbers. According to Theorem 10.5,
a finitely generated monoid B is a coordinate monoid over A iff B is embedded into
a direct power of N. Remark that the monoid Nn has a rich class of submonoids.
For example, it contains monoids which are not isomorphic to a direct powers of N.
11 Coordinate algebras of irreducible algebraic sets
An L-algebra A discriminates an L-algebra B if for any finite set of distinct elements
b1, b2, . . . , bn there exists a homomorphism φ : B → A such that φ(bi) 6= φ(bj) for all i 6= j,
i.e. φ is injective on the set {b1, b2, . . . , bn}. Obviously, the approximation is a special case
(n = 2) of the discrimination.
The following theorem shows the role of the discrimination in the description of irre-
ducible coordinate algebras.
A finitely generated L-algebra B is the coordinate L-algebra of an
Theorem 11.1.
irreducible algebraic set Y over an L-algebra A iff B is discriminated by A.
Proof. Let us prove the “only if” part of the statement. Suppose B ∼= ΓA(Y ) for a
nonempty algebraic set Y over A. Let us assume that B is not discriminated by A,
i.e. there exist distinct elements [t1(X)]Y , [t2(X)]Y , . . . , [tm(X)]Y ∈ B such that for any
homomorphism φ ∈ Hom(B, A) there are indexes i 6= j with φ([ti(X)]Y ) = φ([tj(X)]Y ).
Since any homomorphism of coordinate algebras has the form (25), the assumption above
for each point P ∈ Y there exist indexes i 6= j such that
is formulated as follows:
ti(P ) = tj(P ). Therefore
(Y ∩ VA(ti(X) = tj(X))).
(27)
Y =[i<j
According to Theorem 10.1, B is approximated by A, i.e. for all i 6= j there exists a
point Pij ∈ Y with ti(Pij) 6= tj(Pij). It follows that Yij ⊂ Y for all i < j. Thus, (27) is a
proper decomposition of the set Y , and we obtain a contradiction with the irreducibility
of the set Y .
Let us prove the “if” part of the statement. Since the approximation is a special case
of the discrimination, B is approximated by A. According to Theorem 10.1, there exists
an algebraic set over A with ΓA(Y ) ∼= B. Assume that Y is reducible and it admits a
decomposition
Y = Y1 ∪ Y2 ∪ . . . ∪ Ym (Yi ⊂ Y, Yi * Yj for all i 6= j).
By (20), it follows RadA(Y ) ⊂ RadA(Yi), and there exist equations ti(X) = si(X) ∈
RadA(Yi) \ RadA(Y ). Let us show that an arbitrary homomorphism φ ∈ Hom(B, A) is
not injective on the set M = {[ti(X)]Y , [si(X)]Y 1 ≤ i ≤ m}. Following (25), φ = φP
for some point P ∈ Y . Since Y is a union of Yi, the have P ∈ Yk for some 1 ≤ k ≤ m.
Therefore tk(P ) = sk(P ) and
φP ([tk(X)]Y ) = φP ([sk(X)]Y ).
(28)
Since tk(X) = sk(X) /∈ RadA(Y ), the elements [tk(X)]Y , [sk(X)]Y are distinct in the
L-algebra B. So [tk(X)]Y , [sk(X)]Y are distinct elements of the set M. However, by (28)
the homomorphism φP is not injective on M, a contradiction with the discrimination of
B.
28
Theorem 11.2.
coordinate algebra of an irreducible algebraic set over A iff B is embedded into A.
Let A be a finite L-algebra. A finitely generated L-algebra B is the
Proof. Let us prove the “only if” part of the statement. If B contains at least n > A
different elements b1, b2, . . . , bn, there is not any homomorphism φ : B → A which is
injective on the set {bi}, and we obtain a contradiction with Theorem 11.1. Therefore,
B ≤ A, i.e. B is also finite. Let b1, b2, . . . , bm (m ≤ n) be all elements of B. An injective
on {bi} homomorphism φ : B → A provides the embedding of B into A.
The proof of the “if” part of the statement immediately follows from the obvious
discrimination of any subalgebra B ⊆ A by A.
Theorem 11.3. Let A be an L-algebra from a locally finite variety V (remark that A
may not be finitely generated). Then a finitely generated L-algebra B is the coordinate
algebra of an irreducible algebraic set over A iff B is embedded into A.
Proof. The proof of this theorem repeats the proof of Theorem 11.2, since B ∈ V (Re-
mark 8.1) that gives the finiteness of B.
Let us describe the coordinate algebras of irreducible algebraic sets over some algebras.
1. Let A be a torsion-free abelian group. Proposition 8.2 provides that a group B is
approximated by A iff B ∼= Zn for some n. Let us show that B is discriminated by
A. First of all we assume the following.
(a) We assume that A ∼= Z (any torsion-free group G contains a subgroup Z,
therefore the discrimination of B by Z implies the discrimination by G).
(b) We assume B = Z2 = Z ⊕ Z (the general case B ∼= Zn is considered by the
induction on n and its proof is similar to the case n = 2).
Let b1, b2, . . . , bn be different elements of B ∼= Z2. Each bi is a pair bi = (bi1, bi2),
where bij ∈ Z. Let us consider a map φα : B → Z φα((x, y)) = αx + y, where a
number α ∈ Z\{0} will be defined below. It is easy to see that φα ∈ Hom(B, A). Let
us choose α such that the homomorphism is φα injective on {bi}. An integer number
α is said to be forbidden if φα is not injective on the set {bi}. Let us prove there
exist at most finite set of forbidden numbers. Indeed, the equality φα(bi) = φα(bj)
implies
αbi1 + bi2 = αbj1 + bj2 ⇔ α(bi1 − bj1) + (bi2 − bj2) = 0,
and the last equation has a unique solution αij. Choosing all pairs i, j, we obtain a
finite set of forbidden numbers αij. Thus, there exists an integer permitted number α
such that the homomorphism φα is injective on {bi}, and therefore B is discriminated
by A.
According to Theorem 11.1, we have the following result.
Proposition 11.4. A finitely generated abelian group G is the coordinate group of
an irreducible algebraic set over a torsion-free abelian group A iff G is isomorphic
to Zn for some n.
29
2. Similarly, one can prove that any submonoid in Nn is discriminated by N, and
Theorem 11.1 gives the following result.
Proposition 11.5. A finitely generated commutative monoid M is the coordinate
monoid of an irreducible algebraic set over N iff M is embedded into a direct power
of N.
3. Since the varieties of semilattices, left zero semigroups and rectangular bands are lo-
cally finite, irreducible coordinate semigroups in such varieties satisfy Theorem 11.3.
4. Let A be a finitely generated abelian group. By (7), the group A admits a pre-
sentation A = Zn ⊕ T (A). If n = 0 (i.e. A = T (A)), the group A is finite, and
Theorem 11.2 states that irreducible coordinate groups over A are exactly the sub-
groups of A.
Suppose now n > 0 and consider a finitely generated abelian group B = Zm ⊕
T (B) such that B is discriminated by A. Since the subgroup T (B) is finite, the
discrimination gives that T (B) is embedded into T (A). By 8.2, the subgroup Zm ⊆
B is discriminated by Zn ⊆ A, and we obtain the following result.
Theorem 11.6. A finitely generated abelian group B = Zm⊕T (B) is an irreducible
coordinate group over a finitely generated abelian group A = Zn⊕T (A) iff the torsion
T (B) is embedded into T (A) and m = 0 for n = 0.
5. Let us show (as we promised in Section 6.2) that an algebraic set Y = VF Sr ({xy =
yx, yz = zy}) over the free semigroup F Sr is irreducible. Let us compute the
coordinate semigroup of the set Y . Remark that the equation xz = zx belongs to the
radical of Y , therefore the coordinate semigroup ΓF Sr(Y ) generated by the elements
x, y, z is commutative. Since there are not other relations between the elements
x, y, z ∈ ΓF Sr(Y ), the semigroup ΓF Sr(Y ) is isomorphic to the free commutative
semigroup of rank 3, i.e. ΓF Sr(Y ) ∼= (N \ 0)3. To prove the irreducibility of Y it
is sufficient to show that the semigroup (N \ 0)3 is discriminated by F Sr. The last
property follows from Proposition 11.5, where we proved that (N\0)3 is discriminated
by N \ 0 ⊆ F Sr.
12 When all algebraic sets are irreducible
There are L-algebras where all nonempty algebraic sets are irreducible. Following [4],
such algebras are called co-domains. Theorems 10.1, 11.1 give the following criterion for
an L-algebra to be a co-domain.
Theorem 12.1. An L-algebra A is a co-domain iff for any finitely generated L-algebra
B the following conditions are equivalent
1. B is approximated by A;
2. B is discriminated by A
(remark that the second condition implies the first one for any L-algebra A).
Let us show examples of co-domains in different classes of algebras.
30
1. Let us show that an infinite direct power of any L-algebra A is a co-domain. Let
Aω =Qi∈I A denote an infinite power of A, and suppose that a finitely generated
L-algebra B is approximated by Aω. By Theorem 10.5, B is embedded into a direct
power Aω, so B is embedded into a direct power of A. Thus, one can treat elements
of B as vectors with coordinates from A. Let b1, b2, . . . , bn be different elements of
B, i.e.
there exists an index ijk ∈ I such that the elements bj, bk have different
ijk-th coordinates. Let I ′ = {ikj 1 ≤ j < k ≤ n}, and B′ be the projection
π(B) onto the coordinates I ′. Since B′ is a finite direct power of A, the algebra B′ is
embedded into A∞ and the images π(b1), π(b2), . . . , π(bn) are different in A∞. Thus,
B is discriminated by Aω, and by Theorem 12.1 the algebra Aω is a co-domain.
2. According to Propositions 11.4, 11.5, any torsion-free abelian group and the monoid
N are co-domains.
3. Let F be the free semilattice of infinite rank. According to semilattice theory, F is
isomorphic to the family of all finite subsets of natural numbers N relative to the
operation of set union. Moreover, semilattice theory states that any finite semilattice
is embedded into F . Therefore F discriminates any finite semilattice (in the locally
finite varieties of semilattices every finitely generated semilattice is finite). Thus F
is a co-domain.
The following algebras are not co-domains.
1. Let A = {a1, a2, . . . , an} be a finite L-algebra. Then the solution set of the L-system
S = {x1 = x1, x2 = x2, . . . , xn+1 = xn+1} is reducible:
VA(S) =[i6=j
VA(S ∪ {xi = xj}).
2. By the previous item, any cyclic group Zn is not a co-domain. Moreover, below
we prove that any finitely generated abelian group with a nontrivial torsion is not
a co-domain. Let A = Zn ⊕ T (A). Since T (A) is finite for a finitely generated A,
there exists a natural number m such that mx = 0 for each x ∈ T (A). Let k denote
the order of T (A) and S be an L-system
{mxi = 0 1 ≤ i ≤ k + 1},
which is obviously satisfied only by points (a1, a2, . . . , ak+1) ∈ T k+1(A). Since
T (A) = k, there exists a pair of coordinates i, j such that ai = aj. Therefore
the solution set of S is reducible and admits a presentation
VA(S) =[i6=j
VA(S ∪ {xi = xj}).
3. The free monoid F Mr of rank r > 1 is not a co-domain, since
VF Mr({xy = yx, yz = zy}) = VF Mr({xy = yx, yz = zy, xz = zx})∪
VF Mr({xy = yx, yz = zy, y = 1})
31
13 The intervention of model theory
13.1 Quasi-identities and universal formulas
One of the unexpected result of Unifying theorems is the description of coordinate alge-
bras by first-order formulas of special kind. Below we assume that a reader knows the
definition of a first-order formulaWikiof a language L and main identities of the first-order
logic. The operations of the conjunction, disjunction and negation are denoted by ∧, ∨, ¬
respectively. Moreover, the expression x 6= y is the abbreviation for ¬(x = y).
A universal formula of a language L is a formula equivalent to
∀x1∀x2 . . . ∀xnϕ(x1, x2, . . . , xn),
(29)
where ϕ is a quantifier-free formula. A quasi-identity of L is a universal formula, where
the subformula ϕ has the form
(t1(X) = s1(X)) ∧ (t2(X) = s2(X)) ∧ . . . ∧ (tm(X) = sm(X)) → (t(X) = s(X)),
where ti(X), si(X), t(X), s(X) are L-terms in variables X = {x1, x2, . . . , xn}.
Many properties of algebraic structures can be written as universal formulas or quasi-
identities.
1. It is easy to see that any identity
∀x1∀x2 . . . ∀xn t(X) = s(X)
of a language L is a quasi-identity, since it is equivalent to
∀x1∀x2 . . . ∀xn ((x1 = x1) → (t(X) = s(X)))
2. The cancellation property in the language Ls is written as the following quasi-
identity
∀x∀y∀z((xz = yz) → (x = y)) ∧ ((zx = zy) → (x = y)).
For a commutative semigroup of the language L+s the cancellation property is writ-
ten as the following quasi-identity
∀x∀y∀z((x + z = y + z) → (x = y)).
3. One of the principal properties of the additive monoid of natural numbers can be
written as the quasi-identity
∀x∀y((x + y = 0) → (x = 0)).
Following [87], this property is called the positiveness, and in Section 13.2 it is used
in the description of coordinate monoids over N.
4. The injectivity of a function f defined on an unar U can be written as the following
quasi-identity of the language Lu
∀x∀y((f (x) = f (y)) → (x = y)).
Obviously, all free unars F Un satisfy this formula.
32
5. The transitivity of the commutation in a semigroup can be written as the following
quasi-identity
∀x∀y∀z((xy = yx) ∧ (yz = zy) → (xz = zx)).
6. If an abelian group A satisfies the following list of quasi-identities
{∀x((nx = 0) → (x = 0)) n ∈ N}
the group A is torsion-free.
The following properties of L-algebras can be written as universal formulas .
1. If a semilattice S satisfies the following formula of the language Ls
∀x∀y ((x ≤ y) ∨ (y ≤ x)),
S is linearly ordered (precisely, in this formula one should replace all occurrences of
inequalities a ≤ b to ab = a, and after that we obtain a formula of the language Ls)
2. All free monoids satisfy the universal formula
∀x∀y∀z((xy = yx) ∧ (yz = zy) → ((y = 1) ∨ (xz = zx))).
3. The following universal formula states that an L-algebra A contain at most n ele-
ments:
∀x1∀x2 . . . ∀xn∀xn+1(_i6=j
(xi = xj)).
Remark that the properties “an L-algebra A contain exactly n elements” and “an
L-algebra A contains at least n elements” are not expressible by universal formulas.
4. The property “ in a group G there are at most k elements of the order n” is written
as the following universal formula of the language Lg
∀x1∀x2 . . . ∀xk∀xk+1(
k+1
^i=1
(xj
i 6= 1)
n−1
^j=1
k+1
^i=1
(xn
i = 1) →_i6=j
(xi = xj)).
Let A be an L-algebra. The quasi-variety qvar(A) (universal closure ucl(A)) is the
class of all L-algebras B such that B satisfies all quasi-varieties (respectively, universal
formulas) which are true in A.
Since any quasi-identity is a universal formula, we have the inclusion ucl(A) ⊆
qvar(A).
The importance of the classes qvar(A), ucl(A) in universal algebraic geometry follows
from the next two sections.
13.2 Coordinate algebras
Theorem 13.1.
nonempty algebraic set over an L-algebra A, then B ∈ qvar(A).
If a finitely generated L-algebra B is the coordinate algebra of a
33
Proof. By Theorem 10.1, B is approximated by A. Suppose there exists a quasi-identity
ϕ : ∀x1∀x2 . . . ∀xn(
ti = si → t = s)
m
^i=1
such that ϕ is true in A, but false in B (above ti, si, t, s are L-terms in variables
X = {x1, x2, . . . , xn}). Therefore, there exist elements b1, b2, . . . , bn ∈ B such that
ti(b1, b2, . . . , bn) = si(b1, b2, . . . , bn), but t(b1, b2, . . . , bn) 6= s(b1, b2, . . . , bn). Since B is
approximated by A, there exists a homomorphism φ ∈ Hom(B, A) with
φ(t(b1, b2, . . . , bn)) = t(φ(b1), φ(b2), . . . , φ(bn))) 6= s(φ(b1), φ(b2), . . . , φ(bn)) = φ(s(b1, b2, . . . , bn)).
(30)
Since φ preserves all equalities between elements of B, we have the following equalities
in A:
ti(φ(b1), φ(b2), . . . , φ(bn))) = si(φ(b1), φ(b2), . . . , φ(bn)).
Thus, the point P = (φ(b1), φ(b2), . . . , φ(bn)) make the subformula
ti = si
m
^i=1
true. Since ϕ holds in A, the equation t(X) = s(X) should satisfy the point P , and we
came to the contradiction with (30).
The profit of Theorem 13.1 is the following: for a given L-algebra A one can restrict
the class of coordinate algebras over A. For example, Theorem 13.1 immediately gives
that any coordinate monoid of algebraic set over the monoid N is positive, since N is
positive and the property of positiveness can be written as quasi-identity of the language
L+m (see above).
Actually, for equationally Noetherian algebras it holds the converse to Theorem 13.1
statement.
If a finitely generated L-algebra B belongs to the quasi-variety qvar(A)
Theorem 13.2.
generated by an equationally Noetherian L-algebra A, then B is the coordinate algebra of
a nonempty algebraic set over A.
Proof. Assume the converse: the L-algebra B is not the coordinate algebra of a nonempty
algebraic set over A. By Theorem 10.1 it follows that there exist two distinct elements
b, b′ ∈ B such that for any homomorphism φ ∈ Hom(B, A) it holds φ(b) = φ(b′).
Suppose B has a presentation hb1, b2, . . . , bn Ri. Let ¯b denote the vector of the
generators (b1, b2, . . . , bn). There exist L-terms t(¯b), t′(¯b) with b = t(b1, b2, . . . , bn),
b′ = t′(b1, b2, . . . , bn).
One can treat the set of defining relations R = {ti(¯b) = si(¯b) i ∈ I} as an L-system
in variables b1, b2, . . . , bn over the algebra A. Since A is equationally Noetherian, there
exists a finite subsystem R′ = {ti(¯b) = si(¯b) i ∈ I ′} such that R′ ∼A R (in other words,
the algebras B′ = hb1, b2, . . . , bn R′i and B have the same set of homomorphisms to the
algebra A). Let us show that the following quasi-identity
holds in A.
ϕ : ∀x1∀x2 . . . ∀xn(^i∈I ′
ti = si → t = s).
34
If ϕ does not holds in A, there exist elements a1, a2, . . . , an such that
ti(a1, a2, . . . , an) = si(a1, a2, . . . , an) (i ∈ I ′), t(a1, a2, . . . , an) 6= s(a1, a2, . . . , an).
Therefore the homomorphism φ ∈ Hom(B′, A) = Hom(B, A) defined by φ(bj) = aj (one
can check that this map is really homomorphism) satisfies φ(b) = t(a1, a2, . . . , an) 6=
s(a1, a2, . . . , an) = φ(b′). The last inequality contradicts the choice of the elements b, b′.
Thus, we obtain that ϕ is true in A.
Since B ∈ qvar(A), the algebra B satisfies the quasi-identity ϕ. The equalities
ti(b1, b2, . . . , bn) = si(b1, b2, . . . , bn) (i ∈ I ′) hold in B, since they are defining relations
of B. The truth of ϕ in B implies b = t(b1, b2, . . . , bn) = s(b1, b2, . . . , bn) = b′ that contra-
dicts the choice of the elements b, b′.
Actually, one can prove Theorem 13.2 for a wide class of qω-compact algebras (see
details in Section 19).
The sense of Theorems 13.1, 13.2 is the following: any coordinate L-algebra B of a
nonempty algebraic set over an equationally Noetherian L-algebra A inherits the prop-
erties of A which can be written as quasi-identities of the language L. For example, a
coordinate group over the cyclic group Zn is not necessarily cyclic, since the property “to
be a cyclic group” is not expressible as a quasi-identity of the language L+g (see Theo-
rem 13.3). Moreover, Theorems 13.1, 13.2 explain the following phenomenon. One can
consider the set Z = {0, ±1, ±, 2, . . .} as a commutative monoid in the language L+m.
Then the coordinate algebras of algebraic sets over the monoid Z are not necessarily
abelian groups, since the property “to be a group” can not be written as a quasi-identity
of the language L+m (see example below).
Thus, it follows from Theorems 13.1, 13.2 that the class of coordinate algebras over
a given equationally Noetherian L-algebra A is logical, i.e. it can be defined by a set of
logical formulas (quasi-identities). Let us give examples which demonstrate such property
of coordinate algebras.
1. Let A = Zk ⊕ T (A) be a finitely generated abelian group. Below we define a set of
quasi-identities ΣA which are true in A. Initially, we put ΣA = ∅.
A group A has a period n if for each a ∈ A it holds na = 0 and n is the minimal
number with such property. For example, the group A = Z2 ⊕ Z3 has the period
n = 6. One can prove that the period of a finitely generated abelian group exists iff
A = T (A), and the period equals the least common multiple of the orders of direct
summand of T (A). For example, the periods of the groups Z4 ⊕Z3, A = Z2 ⊕Z4 ⊕Z8
are 12, 8 respectively.
Thus, if a group A has the period n we add to the set ΣA the following identity
∀x (nx = 0)
(remind that any identity is equivalent to a quasi-identity)
From the set of quasi-identities
Σp,n = {∀x (pnx = 0 → pn−1x = 0) p is prime , n ∈ N},
(31)
let us add to ΣA the quasi-identies which are true in the group A. Let us explain,
the sense of the set Σp,n by the following examples (below p, q are pimes).
35
(a) If A = Z (one can take here any torsion-free group), then each quasi-identity
of the form (31) is true in A (the condition pnx = 0 implies in A the equality
x = 0, and pn−1x = 0 obviously holds).
(b) Let A = Zqn. All quasi-identities (31) for p 6= q are true in A, since there are
not nonzero elements of order pn in A, and the left part of the implication (31)
becomes false, therefore the whole formula (31) becomes true. Moreover, any
quasi-identity (31) for p = q and n < m is also true in A, since the condition
qmx = 0 implies that an element x ∈ A becomes zero in a power less than qm.
By the other hand, the set ΣA does not contain all formulas with p = q and
m ≤ n, since the condition qmx = 0 does not now imply qm−1x = 0, because
the group Zqn contains an element of order qm.
(c) Let A = Zpn ⊕ Zqm. By the reasonings from the previous item, one can prove
that a quasi-identity Q from Σp,n is true in A iff Q is true in Zpn and Zqm
simultaneously.
(d) Actually, the following general statement holds: if the torsion T (A) of a finitely
generated abelian group A does not contain Zqm as a subgroup of a direct sum-
mand, then A satisfies the following quasi-identities
∀x (qnx = 0 → qn−1x = 0)
for every n ≥ m.
Theorem 13.3. Let A, B be finitely generated abelian groups. Then the following
conditions are equivalent:
(a) B is the coordinate group of a nonempty algebraic set over A;
(b) B is a direct sum of groups from Sub⊕(A).
(c) B satisfies all quasi-identities ΣA.
Proof. The equivalence of the first two conditions was proved in Theorem 10.6. By
Theorem 13.1, we have (a) ⇒ (c). Thus, it is sufficient to prove (c) ⇒ (b).
Assume the presentation (7) of B contains as a direct summand Zqm /∈ Sub⊕(A).
By the properties of the set ΣA the group A satisfies the formulas
∀x (qnx = 0 → qn−1x = 0)
for any n ≥ m. Since B contains Zqm as direct summand, the equality qmx = 0
does not imply qm−1x = 0 in Zqm. Thus, the quasi-identity
∀x (qmx = 0 → qm−1x = 0)
is false in B, that contradicts the condition.
Therefore, for all direct summands Zqn of the group B we proved Zqn ∈ Sub⊕(A).
Assume now that Z is a direct summand in B. If Z /∈ Sub⊕(A) the group A has a
finite period n, and the definition of the set ΣA gives (∀x (nx = 0)) ∈ ΣA. By the
condition, such quasi-identity should hold in B, so B has a finite period. We came
to the contradiction, since B contains Z.
Thus, we proved that B is a direct sum of groups from Sub⊕(A).
36
2. Let us consider the set of integer numbers Z as a commutative monoid of the lan-
guage L+m. For coordinate algebras of algebraic sets over Z we have the following
theorem.
Theorem 13.4. A finitely generated commutative monoid M is the coordinate
monoid of an algebraic set over the monoid Z iff M satisfies the following quasi-
identities:
∀x∀y∀z(x + z = y + z → x = y) (cancellation property),
ϕn : ∀x (nx = 0 → x = 0), n ≥ 1
(the series {ϕn} provides that M does not contain elements of finite order).
Proof. The “only if” statement follows from Theorem 13.1, since all quasi-identities
above hold in Z. Let us prove the “if” statement of the theorem. Following The-
orem 10.5, it is sufficient to prove the embedding of M into a direct power of the
monoid Z. By semigroup theory, a commutative monoid M is embedded into an
abelian group iff M has the cancellation property. Thus, there exists an abelian
group A with a submonoid isomorphic to M. Since M is finitely generated, so is A.
Following (7), A is isomorphic to a direct sum Zn ⊕ T (A). Since the quasi-identities
ϕn hold in M, the monoid M does not contain elements of finite order, and actually
M is embedded into a subgroup Zn ⊆ A.
3. One can compare Theorem 13.4 with the similar result for the monoid N.
Theorem 13.5. A finitely generated commutative monoid M is the coordinate
monoid of an algebraic set over N iff M satisfies the following quasi-identities:
∀x∀y∀z(x + z = y + z → x = y) (cancellation property),
∀x∀y(x + y = 0 → x = 0) (positiveness).
Proof. By Proposition 11.5, it is sufficient to prove that any positive commutative
monoid with cancellations is embedded into a direct power of Nn. One can see the
proof of this fact in [52] or [87] (remark that in [52] a positive monoid is called a
reduced monoid).
4. For unars of the language Lu we have the following result.
Theorem 13.6. For a nontrivial finitely generated unar U the following conditions
are equivalent:
(a) U is isomorphic to a free unar F Um for some m ≥ 1;
(b) U is the coordinate unar of an algebraic set over the free unar F Un (n ≥ 1);
37
(c) U satisfies the quasi-identities
ϕ : ∀x∀y(f (x) = f (y) → x = y) (the function f is injective),
ϕn : ∀x∀y(f n(x) = x → x = y) (n ≥ 1)
(the quasi-identities ϕn provides the following property: if an unar U contains
an element x such that x = f n(x) for some n ≥ 1 then the unar U is trivial).
Proof. One can see that a unar U satisfying ϕ, ϕn is either free or trivial. The trivial
unar is the coordinate unar of the empty set, therefore U is free.
13.3
Irreducible algebraic sets
Let us consider the role of the class ucl(A) in algebraic geometry over an L-structure A.
First of all we prove the following auxiliary statement from model theory.
Proposition 13.7.
L-algebra A iff B satisfies all formulas of the form
An L-algebra B belongs to the universal closure ucl(A) of an
∀x1∀x2 . . . ∀xn(
(ti = si) → (
m
^i=1
(t′
j = s′
j)))
l
_j=1
(32)
which are true in A (ti, si, t′
j, s′
j are L-terms).
Proof. According to the main identities of the first-order logic, the quantifier-free subfor-
mula ϕ(x1, x2, . . . , xn) of an universal formula (29) can be written as
ϕ : ∀x1∀x2 . . . ∀xn (
Dk),
r
^k=1
where Dk are disjunctions of atomic formulas and their negations (the precise structure
Dk is written below). Using the logic identity
∀x (ϕ1 ∧ ϕ2) ∼ ∀x (ϕ1) ∧ ∀x (ϕ2),
we obtain that ϕ holds in A iff all formulas
∀x1∀x2 . . . ∀xn (Dk).
(33)
are true in A.
Thus the truth of (29) in B is equivalent to the simultaneous truth of formulas of the
form (33). Thus, it is sufficient to prove that any formula (33) can be transformed to (32).
Indeed, the quantifier-free part Dk of (33) is the following expression
(ti 6= si)_j
_i
(t′
j = s′
i).
Using the identities of the first-order logic, we obtain:
_i
(ti 6= si)_j
(t′
j = s′
i) ∼ ¬(^i
(ti = si))_j
(t′
j = s′
i) ∼^i
(ti = si) → (_j
j = s′
t′
i).
38
Theorem 13.8.
irreducible algebraic set over an L-algebra A, then B ∈ ucl(A).
If a finitely generated L-algebra B is the coordinate L-algebra of an
Proof. By Theorem 11.1, B is discriminated by A. Let us assume there exists a universal
formula (32) which is true in A but false in B. Therefore, there exists a vector ¯b =
(b1, b2, . . . , bn) ∈ Bn such that ti(¯b) = si(¯b), t′
j(¯b) for all 1 ≤ i ≤ m, 1 ≤ j ≤ l.
Since B is discriminated by A there exists a homomorphism φ ∈ Hom(B, A) with
j(¯b) 6= s′
φ(t′
j(¯b)) = t′
j(φ(b1), φ(b2), . . . , φ(bn))) 6= s′
j(φ(b1), φ(b2), . . . , φ(bn)) = φ(s′
j(¯b))
(34)
for all 1 ≤ j ≤ l.
By the definition of a homomorphism, we have the following equalities
ti(φ(b1), φ(b2), . . . , φ(bn))) = si(φ(b1), φ(b2), . . . , φ(bn))
in A for each 1 ≤ i ≤ m.
Thus, the subformula
ti = si
m
^i=1
becomes true for the vector φ(¯b) = (φ(b1), φ(b2), . . . , φ(bn)) ∈ An.
Since A satisfies the universal formula (32), the subformula
j = s′
t′
j
l
_j=1
should be true at φ(¯b). Therefore, there exists an index j with t′
contradiction with (34).
j(φ(¯b)) = s′
j(φ(¯b)), a
The role of Theorem 13.8 is close to Theorem 13.1: for a fixed L-algebra A one can
easily discover main properties of the irreducible coordinate algebras over A. For example,
Theorem 13.8 states that any irreducible coordinate semilattice over the linearly ordered
semilattice Ln is always linearly ordered, since the property “to be a linearly ordered
semilattice” is written as a universal formula of the language Ls (see Section 13.1).
Actually, for equationally Noetherian algebras one can prove the statement converse
to Theorem 13.8.
If a finitely generated L-algebra B belongs to the universal closure
Theorem 13.9.
ucl(A) generated by an equationally Noetherian L-algebra A, then B is isomorphic to the
coordinate L-algebra of an irreducible algebraic set over A.
Proof. The proof of this theorem is left to the reader, since it is close to the proof of
Theorem 13.2.
Remark 13.10. One can deduce the following principle from Theorem 13.9: if the uni-
versal theory of an L-algebra A is undecidable it is impossible to obtain a nice description
of irreducible coordinate algebras over A. For example, one can take the free nilpotent
group F Nn of rank n > 1 and nilpotency classWiki2. It follows from model theory that
F Nn has an undecidable universal theory. Thus, it is impossible to obtain a description
of irreducible coordinate groups over F Nn. Nevertheless, the coordinate groups of the
solution sets of systems in one variable were described [84].
39
Actually, one can prove Theorem 13.9 for any uω-compact L-algebra A, not merely
for equationally Noetherian A (for more details see Section 19).
According to Theorems 13.8, 13.9, the class of irreducible coordinate algebras over an
equationally Noetherian L-algebra A is a logical, i.e. it is defined by universal formulas.
Let us give examples which show this property.
1. Let A be an abelian group. Let us define a set of universal formulas Σ′ as fol-
A = ΣA, where the set of quasi-identities ΣA was defined in
lows. Firstly, we put Σ′
Section 13.2. Let us consider a set of universal formulas of the form
ϕn,k : ∀x1∀x2 . . . ∀xn+1(
(pkxi = 0)
n+1
^i=1
n+1
^i=1
(pk−1xi 6= 0) → _1≤i<j≤n+1
(xi = xj)). (35)
The formula ϕn,k obviously states that there are at most n elements of order pk in
a group A.
Let us add to Σ′
A all formulas of the form ϕn,k which are true in A.
Theorem 13.11.
abelian group. Then the following conditions are equivalent
Let A = Zn ⊕ T (A), B = Zm ⊕ T (B) be finitely generated
(a) B is an irreducible coordinate group over A;
(b) T (B) is embedded into T (A) and m = 0 if n = 0;
(c) B satisfies all universal formulas of the set Σ′
A.
Proof. The equivalence of the conditions (a), (b) follows from Theorem 11.6. The
implication (a) ⇒ (c) follows from Theorem 13.8. Thus, it is sufficient to prove
(c) ⇒ (b).
If n = 0 the group A has a finite period d and the set Σ′
∀x (dx = 0). Therefore B has also a finite period and we have m = 0.
A contains a formula
Let T (B) is isomorphic to the following direct sum
Zn1 ⊕ Zn2 ⊕ . . . ⊕ Znt,
where ni are powers of primes. Each group Zni is generated by the element 1i of
order ni. Since B satisfies every formula ϕn,k (35) such that ϕn,k is true in A, one
can map the elements 1i into different elements of T (A). Moreover, the elements
1i, 1j (i 6= j) are mapped into different direct summands of T (A). Following the
formula (35), the elements 1i and their images have the same order. Thus, T (B) is
embedded into T (A).
2. Since the monoid of natural numbers N is a co-domain (see Section 12), Theo-
rem 13.5 immediately gives the following result.
Theorem 13.12. A finitely generated commutative monoid M is an irreducible
coordinate monoid over N iff M satisfies the following quasi-identities:
∀x∀y∀z(x + z = y + z → x = y) (cancellation property),
∀x∀y(x + y = 0 → x = 0) (positiveness).
40
3. Theorem 13.13.
Let Ln be the linearly ordered semilattice of order n. For a
finite semilattice S the following conditions holds S:
(a) S is an irreducible coordinate semilattice over Ln;
(b) S is embedded into Ln
(c) S satisfies the following universal formulas
∀x∀y (x ≤ y ∨ y ≤ x).
∀x1∀x2 . . . ∀xn+1( _1≤i<j≤n+1
(xi = xj))
Proof. The equivalence of the conditions (a), (b) follows from Theorem 11.2. The
implication (a) ⇒ (c) follows from Theorem 13.8. Thus, it is sufficient to prove
(c) ⇒ (b). The first universal formula above states that S is linearly ordered, and
the second one asserts that S contains at most n elements. Thus, S is isomorphic
to Lm for some m ≤ n, therefore S is obviously embedded into Ln.
14 Geometrical equivalence
Two L-algebras A1, A2 are geometrically equivalent if for any L-system S the coordinate
L-algebras of the sets VA1(S), VA2(S) are isomorphic to each other. In other words, we
have the radical equality RadA1(S) = RadA2(S).
It follows from the definition that geometrically equivalent L-algebras A1, A2 have
the same set of the coordinate algebras of algebraic sets. According to Theorem 10.1 we
obtain the following criterion of geometric equivalence.
Theorem 14.1. L-algebras A1, A2 are geometrically equivalent iff any finitely generated
L-algebra B is approximated by A1 iff B is approximated by A1.
One can simplify the statement of Theorem 14.1 if A1, A2 are finitely generated.
Theorem 14.2. A finitely generated L-algebras A1, A2 are geometrically equivalent iff
A1 is approximated by A2 and A2 is approximated by A1.
Proof. The “only if” part of the statement immediately follows from Theorem 14.1. Let
us prove the “if” part. Let us consider a finitely generated L-algebra B1 such that B1
is approximated by A1, i.e.
for arbitrary b1 6= b2 there exists a homomorphism φ ∈
Hom(B1, A1) with φ(b1) 6= φ(b2). By the condition, A1 is approximated by A2, therefore
there exists a homomorphism φ′ ∈ Hom(A1, A2) such that φ′(φ(b1)) 6= φ′(φ(b2)). Thus,
B1 is approximated by A2, and Theorem 14.1 gives the algebras A1, A2 are geometrically
equivalent.
Theorem 14.2 allows us to apply Theorems 10.3, 10.4, 10.6 for the study of geometri-
cally equivalent semilattices, unars and abelian groups.
1. All free unars F Un, F Um are geometrically equivalent.
2. All finite nontrivial semilattices are geometrically equivalent .
3. A finitely generated abelian groups A1, A2 are geometrically equivalent
iff
Sub⊕(A1) = Sub⊕(A2).
41
4. It follows from Section 10 that two rectangular bands are always geometrically
equivalent except the following cases:
(a) the the first band is a left zero semigroup, but the second one isn‘t;
(b) the the first band is a right zero semigroup, but the second one isn‘t;
(c) the the first band is trivial, but the second one isn‘t;
5. Let us prove that a finitely generated commutative monoid with cancellations M is
geometrically equivalent to N iff M is positive. Indeed, in Theorem 13.5 it was proved
that M is approximated by N. By the positiveness property, any one-generated
submonoid in M is isomorphic to N, i.e. N is embedded into M. Thus, N is
approximated by M and Theorem 14.2 concludes the proof.
15 Unifying theorems
Above we describe coordinate algebras and irreducible coordinate algebras with differ-
ent approaches: approximation, discrimination, embeddings, quasi-variety and universal
closure. Actually, it is not a complete list of equivalent approaches in the description of
(irreducible) coordinate algebras.
In [2] it was formulated so-called Unifying theorems
which contain seven (!) approaches in the description of coordinate algebras. Let us
formulate these theorems (all unknown definitions can be found in [1, 2]).
Theorem 15.1.
generated L-algebra B the following conditions are equivalent:
Let A be an equationally Noetherian L-algebra. Then for a finitely
1. B is the coordinate algebra of a nonempty algebraic set over A;
2. B is approximated by A;
3. B is embedded into a direct power of A;
4. B ∈ qvar(A);
5. B belongs to the pre-variety generated by A;
6. B is a subdirect product of finitely many limit algebras over A;
7. B is defined by a complete atomic type of the theory Thqi(A).
Theorem 15.2.
generated L-algebra B the following conditions are equivalent:
Let A be an equationally Noetherian L-algebra. Then for a finitely
1. B is the coordinate algebra of an irreducible algebraic set over A;
2. B is discriminated by A;
3. B is embedded into a ultrapower of A;
4. B ∈ ucl(A);
5. Th∃(A) ⊇ Th∃(B);
42
6. B is a limit algebra over A;
7. B is defined by a complete atomic type of the theory Th∀(A).
Remark 15.3. Fragments of Unifying theorems were appearing in many papers. In [26,
89] (in [42]) Theorems 15.1, 15.2 were proved for groups (for Lie algebras, respectively).
Finally, [1, 2] prove these theorems for an arbitrary algebra.
16 Appearances of constants
In the previous sections we consider groups monoid and semigroups in standard languages
Lg, Lm, Ls. Commutative groups monoids and semigroups were considered in the additive
languages L+g, L+m, L+s. Thus, equations over groups, monoids and semigroups contain
only trivial elements 1 (0 in commutative case). In the following sections we consider a
general form of equations which may contain nontrivial constants.
Let C = {ci i ∈ I} be a set of constant symbols. Below the extended language L ∪ C
is denoted by L(C).
For shortness we give the necessary definitions only for groups. The corresponding
definitions for semigroups, monoid and algebras of an arbitrary language L are similar.
A group G considered as an algebraic system of the language Lg(C) is called a C-group.
A C-group G differs from “classic” group G, since a C-group G has a subgroup C(G)
generated by constants of the set C. If C(G) = G (i.e. any element of the group G is a
product of constants) a C-group G is called Diophantine.
16.1 Equations with constants
The language extension changes the classes of terms and equations. Let us show the
equations in groups and semigroups in languages with constants.
1. Any Lg(C)-equation t(X) = s(X) is equivalent over a Diophantine G-group G to
an equality
w(X) = 1,
(36)
where w(X) is a product of variables in integer powers and constants g ∈ G. Pre-
cisely, w(X) is an element of the free productWikiF (X) ∗ G, where F (X) is the free
group generated by the set X.
Similarly any L+g(C)-equation over a Diophantine abelian C-group A is equivalent
to an expression
k1x1 + k2x2 + . . . + knxn = a,
(37)
where a ∈ A.
2. By the definition, an Ls(C)-equation over a Diophantine C-semigroup S is an ex-
pression
t(X) = s(X),
where t(X), s(X) are products of variables and constants s ∈ S. Any L+m(C)-
equation over a a commutative Diophantine C-monoid with cancellations M is
written as
kjxj + a′,
(38)
Xi∈I
kixi + a =Xj∈J
43
where a, a′ ∈ M, I, J ⊆ {1, 2, . . . , n}, I ∩ J = ∅ (i.e. each variable occurs in at most
one part of the equation).
16.2 New algebraic sets
In the previous section we showed that an extension of the language changes the classes
of terms and equations. Therefore we obtain a wide class of algebraic sets over extended
languages. Moreover, a language extension may change the class of irreducible algebraic
sets. Let us give examples which show such properties of an extension (below G is a
Diophantine C-group).
1. Any point (a1, a2, . . . , an) ∈ Gn is algebraic set over G (actually, this fact holds for
any Diophantine C-semigroup and C-monoid), since it is the solution set of the
following Lg(C)-system S = {xi = ai 1 ≤ i ≤ n}. Moreover, for G > 1 the empty
set is algebraic over G: VA(c = c′) = ∅, where c, c′ are different elements of G.
2. There is an algebraic set Y ⊆ Gn such that Y is irreducible over a group G, but Y
is reducible over a Diophantine C-group G. Let G = Z2 = {0, 1}. The algebraic
set Y = G = VG(x = x) is irreducible over an abelian group G of the language
L+g, since ΓG(Y ) ∼= Z2 and ΓG(Y ) is obviously discriminated by G. Let us extend
the language L+g by new constants C = {0, 1} and obtain an abelian Diophantine
C-group G. The set Y becomes reducible over the C-group G, since Y = VG(x =
0) ∪ VG(x = 1).
Moreover, one can prove that a finite algebraic set Y is irreducible over a Diophan-
tine C-group G iff Y = 1.
3. If a semigroup S is a co-domain, the Diophantine C-semigroup S is not always a
co-domain. Indeed, in Section 12 we proved that the commutative monoid N is a co-
domain in the language L+m. However in the language L+m(C) there are reducible
algebraic sets over the Diophantine C-monoid:
VN(x + y = 1) = VN({x = 0, y = 1}) ∪ VN({x = 1, y = 0}).
16.3 Equationally Noetherian algebras with constants
1. If an L-algebra A is equationally Noetherian the L(C)-algebra A is not necessarily
Indeed, let L∞ = {a1, a2, a3, . . .} be an infinite linearly
equationally Noetherian.
ordered semilattice with ai < ai+1. The semilattice L∞ is equationally Noetherian
as an algebra of the language Ls (L∞ belongs to a locally finite variety, see Section 7).
However, for the Diophantine C-semilattice L∞ there is an infinite Ls(C)-system
S = {x ≥ an n ≥ 1} such that S is not equivalent to any finite subsystem. Thus,
the Diophantine C-semilattice L∞ is not equationally Noetherian.
Moreover, for the variety of semilattices we have the following result.
Proposition 16.1.
iff S is finite.
[6] A Diophantine C-semilattice S is equationally Noetherian
2. Let us consider a Diophantine nilpotent C-group of the nilpotency class 2 given by
the presentation
G = ha1, a2, . . . , an, . . . , b1, b2, . . . , bn, . . . [ai, bj] = 1 i ≤ ji.
44
An infinite Lg(C)-system S = {[x, ai] = 1 i ≥ 1} is not equivalent to any finite
subsystem (a finite subsystem S′ = {[x, ai] = 1 1 ≤ i ≤ n} is satisfied by the point
x = bn, but bn /∈ VG(S)). Thus, the Diophantine C-group G is not equationally
Noetherian. However, the group G in the standard group language Lg is equationally
Noetherian (actually, one can prove that any nilpotent group of the nilpotency class
2 is equationally Noetherian).
3. All classes of algebras considered in Section 7 (abelian and linear groups, free semi-
lattices, rectangular bands, left zero semigroups) remain equationally Noetherian in
extended languages L(C). We give this fact with no proof.
17 Coordinate algebras with constants
In Section 8 it was given the definition of the coordinate L-algebra over an arbitrary
language L (including languages with an arbitrary number of constant symbols). Thus,
the reader can apply this general definition for C-groups and C-semigroups. We remark
below only the principal differences between coordinate algebras in constant-free languages
and in languages with constants. For simplicity we deal with groups in all examples below.
Firstly, the coordinate C-group ΓG(Y ) of an algebraic set Y over a Diophantine C-
group G is not always Diophantine. Thus, all elements of a C-group ΓG(Y ) can be divided
into three groups:
1. constants, i.e. the images of interpretations of constant symbols of the language
Lg(C) (Proposition 17.1 describes below a subgroup generated by constants);
2. “transcendental” elements, i.e. the elements which cannot be obtained from con-
stants;
3. results of functions applied to transcendental and constants elements.
Let us consider a nonempty algebraic set Y over a Diophantine C-group G. By the
definition, distinct constants a, a′ ∈ G are Lg(C)-terms and a ≁Y a′ (i.e. [a]Y 6= [a′]Y in
ΓG(Y )). Thus, we obtain the following statement.
The coordinate C-group ΓA(Y ) for Y 6= ∅ contains a subgroup
Proposition 17.1.
isomorphic to G, and this subgroup is generated by constants (this statement holds for
any Diophantine C-algebra not merely for a group).
Remark that the set Y = ∅ makes Proposition 17.1 false, since the relation ∼∅ over
the set of Lg(C)-terms generates a unique equivalence class, and the coordinate C-algebra
ΓG(Y ) is trivial.
Thus, a constant subgroup of ΓG(Y ) is isomorphic to G, so G is embedded into ΓG(Y ).
The principal question is a way of this embedding, because there is often at least one
embedding of G into ΓG(Y ). The following example shows the differences in algebraic
geometries for different embeddings of G into ΓG(Y ).
Let G1, G2 be two isomorphic copies of the abelian group Z, but G1 is Diophantine
(i.e. all elements of G1 are marked as constants) whereas the set of constants of G2 is
2Z = {0, ±2, ±4, . . .}. It is clear that G1, G2 are abelian C-groups in the language L+g(C)
and the constant subgroups of G1, G2 are isomorphic to Z. The abelian C-group G1 is
∼= Z). However G2 is not approximable by
approximated by the C-group Z (since G1
the C-group Z (by the definition of a homomorphism φ : G2 → Z, the constants of G2
45
should be mapped into the constants of Z; therefore the relation 1 + 1 = 2 becomes
φ(1) + φ(1) = 1, since 2 ∈ G2 and 1 ∈ Z are the interpretations of the same constant
symbol; but there is not any element x in Z satisfying the equality x + x = 1). Since
Unifying theorem 15.1 was proved for an arbitrary language L, it also holds for abelian
groups of the language L+g(C). Thus, the C-group G1 is the coordinate C-group of an
algebraic set over the abelian Diophantine C-group Z, but G2 isn’t.
Let us give examples of coordinate algebras over Diophantine C-groups and C-
monoids.
1. Proposition 17.2. The coordinate C-group of an algebraic set Y over a Diophan-
tine C-group G is isomorphic to G iff Y = 1 (actually, this statement holds for
any Diophantine C-algebra, not merely for groups).
Proof. If a set Y consists of a single P = (p1, p2, . . . , pn) the definition of the equiv-
alence relation ∼Y gives
t(X) ∼Y s(X) ⇔ t(P ) = s(P ).
Therefore for each Lg(C)-term t(X) there exists a unique constant a ∈ G with
t(X) ∼Y a (t(P ) = a), and the equivalence class [t(X)]Y is uniquely defined by a
constant a ∈ [t(X)]Y . Thus, the factor-algebra ΓG(Y ) = T (X)/ ∼Y is isomorphic
to the group generated by constants, i.e. ΓG(Y ) ∼= G.
Let us assume that Y contains a least two points P = (p1, p2, . . . , pn), Q =
(q1, q2, . . . , qn). Without loss of generality we put p1 6= q1. Therefore an L-term
t(X) = x1 is not ∼Y -equivalent to any constant a ∈ G. Thus, the coordinate
C-group ΓG(Y ) is not equivalent to G.
2. Let us consider an equation 2x + 3y + 5z = 5 over the Diophantine C-monoid N.
Obviously, its solution set is Y = {(1, 1, 0), (0, 0, 1)}, therefore the equation x = y
belongs to the radical of Y . Thus, the coordinate C-monoid for the set Y is a
commutative C-monoid given by the following presentation
ΓA(Y ) = hx, y, z RadN(2x+3y+5z = 5)i ∼= hx, y, z RadN(2x+3y+5z = 5), x = yi ∼=
hx, y, z RadN(2x+3x+5z = 5)i ∼= hx, z RadN(5x+5z = 5)i ∼= hx, z RadN(x+z = 1)i.
It is directly checked that RadN(x + z = 1) coincides with the congruent closure
[x + z = 1], therefore
ΓA(Y ) ∼= hx, z x + z = 1i.
The defined relation x + y = 1 describes the way of an embedding of the constant
monoid N into ΓA(Y )
17.1 Coordinate groups over abelian groups
In this section we describe coordinate C-groups over a finitely generated abelian Diophan-
tine C-group A. Moreover we compare algebraic geometries over Diophantine group Z
and monoid N.
By Proposition 17.1, a group A is embedded into any coordinate C-group of a
nonempty algebraic set over A. The following propositions specify the properties of this
embeddings.
46
A subgroup A of an abelian group G is pure if any consistent in G equation nx =
a (a ∈ A) is also consistent in A. According to group theory, we have the following
statement.
Proposition 17.3. Any pure subgroup A of a finitely generated abelian group G is a
direct summand of G, i.e. G ∼= A ⊕ G′ for some finitely generated group G′.
Proposition 17.4.
over an abelian Diophantine group A. Then A is pure in ΓA(Y ).
Let ΓA(Y ) be the coordinate C-group of a nonempty algebraic set
Proof. By Unifying theorem 15.1, the C-group ΓA(Y ) should satisfy all quasi-identities ϕ
of the language L+g(C) such that ϕ holds in A. Since A is Diophantine, one can explicitly
use any element a ∈ A in formulas. Let us consider the following quasi-identity for any
equation nx = a with VA(nx = a) = ∅
ϕ∅,n,a : ∀x (nx = a → x = 0).
(39)
Let us show that the quasi-identity ϕ∅,n,a is true in A.
Indeed, the left part of the
implication in ϕ∅,n,a does not hold for any x ∈ A (since the equation nx = a is inconsistent
in A), therefore the whole implication is true in A.
By Theorem 15.1, all formulas ϕ∅,n,a should hold in ΓA(Y ), therefore any inconsistent
over A equation nx = a remains inconsistent in ΓA(Y ). Thus, A is a pure subgroup of
ΓA(Y ).
By Propositions 17.3, 17.4 we obtain the following statement about coordinate C-
groups over an abelian Diophantine group A.
Suppose an abelian C-group ΓA(Y ) is the coordinate C-group of
Proposition 17.5.
a nonempty algebraic set over a finitely generated abelian Diophantine group A. Then
ΓA(Y ) is isomorphic to a direct sum A ⊕ G′ for some finitely generated group G′.
Thus, we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 17.6. Let A, B be finitely generated abelian C-groups, and A is Diophantine.
Then the following conditions are equivalent:
1. B is the coordinate C-group of a nonempty algebraic set over A;
2. B is a direct sum of groups from Sub⊕(A) and B = A ⊕ B′ for some subgroup
B′ ⊆ B;
3. B satisfies all quasi-identities ΣAA, where ΣAA consists of the set ΣA (see Theo-
rem 10.6) and all quasi-identities of the form (39) which hold in A.
Proof. By Theorem 13.1 we obtain the implication (1) ⇒ (3).
Let us prove (2) ⇒ (1). Following Unifying theorem 15.1, it is sufficient to prove
that B is approximated by A. Let b1, b2 ∈ B be two distinct elements of B. We find
a homomorphism φ ∈ Hom(B, A) such that φ(b1) 6= φ(b2) (recall that a homomorphism
of C-groups acts trivially on the subgroup of constants A ⊆ B). By the definition of a
direct sum, the elements bi admit a unique presentation as sums bi = ai + b′
i, ai ∈ A,
If a1 6= a2 one can define φ as th projection onto A: φ(a + b′) = a. Let
i ∈ B′.
b′
us assume now a1 = a2 = a. The group B′ satisfies the conditions of Theorem 10.6,
therefore B′ is approximated (as a group in the language L+g) by A. Thus, there exists a
47
homomorphism ψ : B′ → A such that ψ(b′
2), and the homomorphism of C-groups
φ(a + b′) = a + ψ(b′) (φ is a homomorphism of abelian C-groups, since it acts trivially on
the set A ⊆ B) has the property φ(b1) 6= φ(b2).
1) 6= ψ(b′
Let us prove (3) ⇒ (2). Since B satisfies the formulas ΣA ⊆ ΣAA, Theorem 13.3 states
that B is a direct sum of groups from the set Sub⊕(A). The quasi-identities (39) from
ΣAA provide the purity of A in B, therefore A is embedded into B as a direct summand
(Proposition 17.3).
An abelian C-group B is the coordinate C-group of a nonempty
Corollary 17.7.
algebraic set over an abelian Diophantine C-group A = Z iff B is isomorphic to a direct
sum A ⊕ Zn for some n ≥ 0.
Unlike the group Z, the class of coordinate C-monoids over the Diophantine monoid
of natural numbers N is not trivial (see [10] for the axiomatization of qvar(N)).
17.2
Irreducible coordinate groups over abelian groups
For irreducible coordinate C-groups over an abelian Diophantine C-group A we have the
following theorem.
Theorem 17.8. Let A, B be a finitely generated abelian C-groups and A is Diophantine.
Then the following conditions are equivalent:
1. B is the coordinate C-group of an irreducible algebraic set over A;
2. B = A ⊕ B′, where
B′ =({0} if A = T (A),
Zn if A contains Z as a direct summand
3. B satisfies all universal formulas of the set ΣAA ∪ Σ′
A (see Theorems 11.6, 17.6).
Proof. Theorem 13.8 immediately proves the implication (1) ⇒ (3).
Let us prove (2) ⇒ (1). By Unifying theorem 15.2, it is sufficient to prove that B is
discriminated by the Diophantine C-group A. If B′ = {0} then B ∼= A and B is obviously
discriminated by A. Let B = A ⊕ Zn and A = Z ⊕ A′. Therefore any element of B is
written as b = a′ + a + z, where a′ ∈ A′, a ∈ Z ⊆ A, z ∈ Zn. Let us consider a set of
elements bi ∈ B given by sums bi = a′
i + ai + zi (1 ≤ i ≤ k).
According to Theorem 11.6, for any finite set of elements z1, z2, . . . , zk ∈ Zn there
exists a group homomorphism ζ : Zn → Z with ζ(zi) 6= ζ(zj) for zi 6= zj. Let us consider
a map φ : B → A, φ(b) = φ(a′ + a + z) = a′ + (a + d · ζ(z)) (the brackets contain an
elements of the subgroup Z ⊆ A), where the integer d will be defined below. It is clear
that φ is a homomorphism of C-groups, since it preserves the operations +, − and it acts
trivially on A ⊆ B. Let us choose d which makes φ injective on the set {bi}.
If the
equality φ(zi) = φ(zj) holds there appears a single constraint for d:
a′
i + ai + dζ(zi) = a′
i + aj + dζ(zj) ⇒ d =
ai − aj
ζ(zj) − ζ(zi)
.
Iterating all possible pairs bi, bj, we obtain at most finite number of constraints for d.
Therefore there exists an integer value of d such that φ is injective on {bi}. Thus, B is
discriminated by A.
48
Let us prove (3) ⇒ (2). The quasi-identities of the form (39) from ΣAA provides
the purity of the group A in B. By Proposition 17.3, A is embedded into B as direct
summand. According the quasi-identities ΣA ∪ Σ′
A and Theorem 13.1, we obtain the
desired structure of B.
A finitely generated C-group B is the coordinate C-group of an
Corollary 17.9.
irreducible algebraic set over the Diophantine C-group A = Z iff B ∼= A ⊕ Zn for some
n ≥ 0. Applying Corollary 17.7, we obtain that the abelian Diophantine C-group Z is a
co-domain in the language L+g(C).
Unlike Z, the Diophantine C-monoid of natural numbers N has a complicated set of
irreducible C-monoids.
Theorem 17.10. [9] Let N be the Diophantine C-monoid of natural numbers. Consider a
finitely generated C-monoid M of the language L+m such that the set of homomorphisms
of C-monoids Hom(M, N) is nonempty. The C-monoid M is the coordinate C-monoid of
an irreducible algebraic set over N iff the constant submonoid of M is isomorphic to N,
and for any a ∈ N M satisfies the following universal formula of the language L+m(C)
ϕa : ∀x∀y (x + y = a →
(x = i)).
a
_i=0
The sense of the formula ϕa is the following: if a sum of elements x, y ∈ M belongs to
the submonoid N ⊆ M, then both summands x, y belong to N ⊆ M. Equivalently,
x, y ∈ M \ N ⇒ x + y ∈ M \ N.
Proof. The “only if” part of the theorem follows from Theorem 13.8, since the formulas
ϕa obviously hold in N. Let us prove the “if” part. By Unifying theorem 15.2, it is
sufficient to prove that for any finite set of distinct elements m1, m2, . . . , mn ∈ M there
is a homomorphism φ ∈ Hom(M, N) injective on {mi}.
Since N ⊆ M, one can define an equivalence relation on M as follows:
m ∼ m′ ⇔ ∃a1, a2 ∈ N : m + a1 = m′ + a2.
Let M ′ = M/ ∼ be the factor-monoid (the zero of M ′ is the equivalence class [0] =
N ⊆ M). Let χ : M → M ′ denote the canonical homomorphism between M and M ′.
It is easy to check that the monoid M ′ of the language L+m is positive and has the
cancellation property (the positiveness of M ′ follows from the implication x, y ∈ M \ N ⇒
x + y /∈ N and [x] + [y] 6= [0]). By Theorem 13.12, M ′ is discriminated (as a monoid of
the language Lm) by the monoid N.
Therefore, there exists a monoid homomorphism ζ : M ′ → N such that ζ(χ(mi)) 6=
ζ(χ(mj)) if χ(mi) 6= χ(mj). Let us consider a map φ(m) = ψ(m) + dζ(χ(m)), where ψ is
an arbitrary element of the nonempty set Hom(M, N) 6= ∅ and a number d will be defined
below.
We have exactly two cases.
1) Let us assume that χ(mi) 6= χ(mj) for any i 6= j. Since M is positive, M has not
a torsion and the equality
φ(mi) = ψ(mi) + dζ(χA(mi)) = ψ(mj) + dζ(χA(mj)) = φ(mj).
49
holds only for a unique d. Since the set {mi} is finite there exists a number d such that
φ is injective on m1, . . . , mk.
2) If χ(mi) = χ(mj) some i 6= j then mi + a = mj + a′ for a, a′ ∈ N, a 6= a′. It is
directly checked that the equality φ(mi) = φ(mj) implies φ(a) = φ(a′). The last equality
is impossible, since φ is a homomorphism of C-monoids, and φ acts trivially on the set of
constants.
Thus, φ has the property φ(mi) 6= φ(mj) (i 6= j), and the C-monoid N discriminates
M.
18 Equational domains
Recall that in Section 12 we studied co-domains. A co-domain is an L-algebra A, where
any nonempty algebraic set is irreducible. In the current section we consider L-algebras
where any finite union of algebraic sets remains algebraic.
Let us give the main definition, following [4]. An L-algebra A is called an equational
domain (e.d.) if any finite union Y1 ∪ Y2 ∪ . . . ∪ Yn of algebraic sets over A is an algebraic
set. Let us give examples which show the properties of this definition.
1. Obviously, one can simplify the definition of e.d. a follows: an L-algebra A is called
an equational domain (e.d.) if any union of two algebraic sets Y1, Y2 over A is an
algebraic set.
2. It is easy to see that the trivial L-algebra A (i.e. A = 1) is an e.d. The proof of
this fact immediately follows from An = 1 and there is a unique algebraic set in
the affine space An.
3. Any nontrivial group G of the language Lg is not an e.d. To prove this fact we
consider the union of the following algebraic sets over G
M = {(x, y) ∈ G2 x = 1 or y = 1} = VA(x = 1) ∪ VA(y = 1).
Let us assume that M is the solution set of some system S(x, y), and w(x, y) = 1
be an arbitrary equation from S(x, y), where
w(x, y) = xn1ym1xn2ym2 . . . xnkymk, mi, ni ∈ Z.
Since any point (1, y) ∈ M should satisfy the equation w(x, y) = 1, we obtain that
the following identity holds in G
ym1+m2+...+mk = 1
Similarly, the points (x, 1) ∈ M gives the truth of the identity
xn1+n2+...+nk = 1.
in G.
Since G is nontrivial, there exists an element g ∈ G \ {1}. Computing w(g, g) = 1,
we obtain
w(g, g) = gn1gm1gn2gm2 . . . gnkgmk = (gn1+n2+...+nk)(gm1+m2+...+mk ) = 1 · 1 = 1,
i.e. w(x, y) = 1 is satisfied by (g, g). Since we arbitrarily chose the equation
w(x, y) = 1 ∈ S, we obtain (g, g) ∈ VG(S) that contradicts (g, g) /∈ M = VG(S).
50
4. In [11] it was proved that any nontrivial semigroup of the language Ls is not an e.d.
5. Let Lr = h+(2), −(2), ·(2), 0i be the language of ringWikitheory. An arbitrary fieldWikiF
is an Lr-algebra with natural
interpretations of the functional symbols. Ap-
plying the axioms of field theory, one can show that any equation in variables
X = {x1, x2, . . . , xn} is equivalent over F to an expression of the form
xm1i
1 xm1i
2
. . . xm1n
n = 0.
(40)
Xi
Let us prove that a field F (as an Lr-algebra) is an e.d. The absence of zero-
divisors plays a key role in this proof. Recall that elements a, b 6= 0 are called
zero-divisors if ab = 0.
Consider a union Y = Y1 ∪ Y2 of algebraic sets Y1, Y2 over F . There exist systems
S1 = {ti(X) = 0 i ∈ I}, S2 = {sj(X) = 0 j ∈ J} with the solution sets Y1, Y2
respectively. The direct check gives that the solution set of the system
S = {ti(X)sj(X) = 0 i ∈ I, j ∈ J}
equals Y . Thus, Y is an algebraic set.
The obtained result can be applied to a wide class of Lr-algebras. Precisely, any
commutative associative ring (as an Lr-algebra) with no zero-divisors is an e.d.
The main result of this section is the following theorem.
Theorem 18.1. An L-algebra A is an e.d. iff the set of points
M = {(x1, x2, x3, x4) ∈ A4 x1 = x2 or x3 = x4} = VA(x1 = x2) ∪ VA(x3 = x4)
(41)
is algebraic over A.
Proof. The “only if” part of the theorem obviously follows from the definition of an e.d.
Let us prove the “if” part of the statement. Suppose M is the solution set of a system
S(x1, x2, x3, x4).
Firstly, we show that the union of the solution sets of two equations t1(X) = t2(X),
t3(X) = t4(X) is algebraic over A. Indeed, changing all variables xi in S(x1, x2, x3, x4) to
the terms ti(X), we obtain
VA(t1(X) = t2(X)) ∪ VA(t3(X) = t4(X)) = VA(S(t1(X), t2(X), t3(X), t4(X))),
and therefore the union of the solution set of two equations is an algebraic set over A.
Let us consider the union of two algebraic sets Y1, Y2 given by systems of equations
S1 = {ti(X) = si(X) i ∈ I}, S2 = {pj(X) = rj(X) j ∈ J}. In other words,
Y1 =\i∈I
VA(ti(X) = si(X)), Y2 = \j∈J
VA(pj(X) = rj(X)).
By the distributive law of set intersection, we obtain
Y = \i∈I,j∈J
(VA(ti(X) = si(X))∪VA(pj(X) = rj(X))) = \i∈I,j∈J
i.e. Y is algebraic.
51
S(ti(X), si(X), pj(X), rj(X)),
The statement of Theorem 18.1 gives the following observation. Extending a language
L by new constants symbols C, we enrich the class of algebraic sets. Thus, it is possible
that the set M (41) is not algebraic over a group (semigroup) A, but M becomes algebraic
over the Diophantine C-group (C-semigroup) A.
in
the languages Lg(C) (respectively, Ls(C)) is wider than in the languages Lg (respectively,
Ls), and the following examples demonstrate this effect.
In other words, the class of e.d.
1. In [4] it was proved the following criterion for e.d.
in the class of Diophantine
C-groups.
Theorem 18.2. A Diophantine C-group G is an e.d.
iff there is not a pair of
elements x, y ∈ G \ {1} such that [x, yg] = 1 for every g ∈ G (the denotation yg
equals g−1yg).
According to Theorem 18.2, the following Diophantine C-groups are e.d.
language Lg(C).
in the
(a) The free group F Gn of rank n > 1 is an e.d. Let us prove this fact. Indeed, if
assume the existence of elements x, y 6= 1 such that [x, yg] = 1 for all g ∈ F Gn
we obtain for g = 1 that x commutes with y. By the properties of the free
groups, there exists w ∈ F Gn with x = wk, yg = wl for some k, l ∈ Z. However
it is easy to find an element h ∈ F Gn such that yh is not a power of w, and
the equality [x, yh] = 1 fails.
(b) Any simpleWikinon-abelian Diophantine C-group G is an e.d.. Let us assume
the existence of elements x, y ∈ G \ {1} such that [x, yg] = 1 for all g ∈ G. By
the assumption, the set
Gx = {y [x, yg] = 1 for all g ∈ G}
is nonempty. If y ∈ Gx then for y−1 it holds
[x, (y−1)g] = [x, (yg)−1] = [yg, x](yg )−1
= 1(yg)−1
= 1
(we use the commutator identity [a, b−1] = [b, a]b−1
If y, z ∈ Gx then the identity [a, cb] = [a, b][a, c]b gives
). Thus, y−1 ∈ Gx.
[x, (yz)g] = [x, (ygzg)] = [x, zg][x, yg]zg
= 1 · 1 = 1.
Thus, yz ∈ Gx and we proved that Gx is a subgroup in G. Let us show that
Gx is a normalWikisubgroup. If z ∈ G, y ∈ Gx then
[x, (z−1yz)g] = [x, yzg] = 1,
and we obtain z−1yz ∈ Gx. Thus, Gx is a normal subgroup.
Since G is simple, Gx = G. Therefore for g = 1 we obtain that for any z ∈ G
it holds [x, z] = 1. Thus x belongs to the centerWikiZ of G. Since Z is always
a normal subgroup, we obtain G = Z. Thus, G is abelian, a contradiction.
2. The examples of e.d.
in the class of groups allow us to define an e.d.
in the class
of semigroups of the language Ls(C). Let us consider a finite Diophantine C-group
in the language Lg(C) (for example, one can choose any
G such that G is an e.d.
finite simple non-abelian group). According to Theorem 18.1, the set M is the
52
solution set of a system S of Lg(C)-equations. If all equations of S do not contain
the operation of the inversion S becomes a system of Ls(C)-equations, and G is an
e.d. as a C-semigroup of the language Ls(C). If S contains occurrences of −1 one
can replace all inversions to a sufficiently large positiver power as follows
x−1 = xG−1,
and G becomes an e.d. as C-semigroup of the language Ls(C).
It follows from Theorem 18.2 that the following classes of Diophantine C-groups are
not e.d. in the language Lg(C):
1. abelian groups;
2. groups with a nontrivial center (for example, nilpotentWikigroups)
For semigroups of the language Ls(C) we have the following results.
1. The free semigroup F Sn and the free monoid F Mn are not e.d.
in the languages
Ls(C) Lm(C) respectively (see the proof in [4]).
2. Any nontrivial Diophantine C-semigroup S with a zeroWikiis not an e.d.
in the
language Ls(C). Let us prove this fact and consider the union of two algebraic sets
M2 = {(x, y) x = a or y = a}, where a is a nonzero element of S. Let us assume
there exists a system of Ls(C)-equations S(x, y) with
that M2 is algebraic, i.e.
the solution set M2. Since the point (0, 0) does not belong to M2, there exists an
equation in S which is not satisfied by (0, 0). It is clear that such equation should
have the form t(x, y) = c, where c is a nonzero constant. If the left part of t(x, y) = c
contain the variable x (respectively, y) it is not satisfied by the point (0, a) ∈ M2
(respectively, (a, 0) ∈ M2). Thus, we obtained the contradiction with the choice of
S.
18.1 Comments
The notion of an e.d. is the generalization of domains in commutative algebra (a domain
is a commutative associative ring with no zero-divisors), since any domain is an e.d.
in
the ring language Lr = {+, −, ·, 0} (see above). Besides commutative rings and groups,
in [4] it was described e.d. in the classes of Lie algebras, anti-commutative algebras and
associative algebras.
The first examples of e.d. in groups were the free non-abelian groups (it was initially
proved by G. Gurevich, see the proof in [76]) and finite non-abelian simile groups (see the
proof above).
We studied e.d. in various classes of semigroups. Above we mentioned about e.d. in
the constant-free language Ls (see [11] for more details). Moreover, we described e.d. in
the classes of completely simple [13], inverse [12] and completely regular [16] semigroups.
The classes of inverse and completely regular semigroups do not contain proper e.d. In
other words, we proved the following theorems.
Theorem 18.3. ([16]) If a Diophantine completely regular C-semigroup S of the language
Ls(C) is an e.d. then S is completely simple.
([12] If a Diophantine inverse C-semigroup S of the language
Theorem 18.4.
Ls−inv(C) = {·,−1 } ∪ {ci i ∈ I} (all inverse semigroups admit the operation of the
inversion) is an e.d. then S is a group.
53
Remark that Theorem 18.4 generalizes the following result of
[115].
[115] If a set M (41) is the solution set of a single equation of the
Theorem 18.5.
language Ls−inv(C) = {·,−1 } ∪ {ci i ∈ I} over an inverse semigroup S then S is a group.
The class of completely simple semigroups contains proper e.d. which are not groups.
One can see such results in our papers [13] (for finite completely simple semigroups of
the language Ls(S)) and [14] (for arbitrary completely simple semigroups of the language
Ls−inv(C) = {·,−1 } ∪ {ci i ∈ I}). In [15] we describe all finite e.d.
in the semigroup
language Ls(C).
In conclusion we remark that there is not any analogue of Theorem 18.2 for semigroups.
In particular, we do not know e.d. among semigroups with the infinite minimal two-sided
ideal and among semigroups with infinite descending chain of two-sided ideals.
19 Types of equational compactness
Actually, one can prove Unifying theorem 15.1, 15.2 for a wide class of L-algebras, not
merely for equational Noetherian ones. Thus, in [3] there were defined the following
generalizations of equationally Noetherian algebras.
An L-algebra A is qω-compact if for any L-system S and an L-equation t(X) = s(X)
such that
there exists a finite subsystem S′ ⊆ S with
VA(S) ⊆ VA(t(X) = s(X))
VA(S′) ⊆ VA(t(X) = s(X)).
An L-algebra A is uω-compact if for any system S and L-equations {ti(X) = si(X)
1 ≤ i ≤ m} such that
VA(S) ⊆
VA(ti(X) = si(X))
m
[i=1
there exists a finite subsystem S′ ⊆ S with
VA(S′) ⊆
m
[i=1
VA(ti(X) = si(X)).s
Let N, Q, U denote the classes of equationally Noetherian, qω-compact and uω-compact
L-algebras, respectively. By the definitions, it follows N ⊆ U ⊆ Q. The importance of
the classes Q, U follows from the following statement.
Theorem 19.1.
algebra A iff A is qω-compact (respectively, uω-compact).
[3]. The statement of Theorem 15.1 (Theorem 15.2) holds for an L-
Using the definition below, one can obtain a necessary condition for an L-algebra to
be qω- or uω-compact.
An L-system S over an L-algebra A is called an Ek-system if VA(S) = k, but for
any finite subsystem S′ ⊆ S it holds VA(S) = ∞. In particular, an E0-system is an
inconsistent system with consistent finite subsystems.
Theorem 19.2.
k ∈ {0, 1} (respectively, k ∈ N).
[71] If A ∈ Q (A ∈ U) then there are not Ek-systems over A for all
54
Proof. Let us prove the necessary condition of the qω-compactness (one can see [71] for
the whole proof of the theorem).
First of all we establish the following property of Ek-systems. If there exists an Ek-
system S over an L-algebra A then there is a variable xi such that for any finite subsystem
S′ ⊆ S the variable xi has an infinite set of values in the set VA(S′). (if there are not
such variables there is a finite subsystem in S with a finite solution set that contradicts
the definition of an Ek-system).
Let us prove there are not E0- and E1-systems over any qω-compact L-algebra A.
Assume the converse: There exists an E0-system S0(X) (or E1-system S1(X)) in variables
X = {x1, x2, . . . , xn}. By the definition, S0(X) is inconsistent and S1(X) has a unique
solution P = (p1, p2, . . . , pn).
Let Si(Y ) denote a system obtained from Si(X) by the substitution xi
7→ yi. Let
S00 = S0(X) ∪ S0(Y ) (respectively, S11 = S1(X) ∪ S1(Y )).
It is easy to see that the
system S00(X, Y ) is inconsistent, and S11(X, Y ) has a unique solution (P, P ). By the
properties of Ek-systems, there exists a pair xi, yi such that xi, yi has an infinite set of
values in the solution set of any finite subsystem S′
00(X, Y ) ⊆ S00(X, Y ) (respectively,
S′
11(X, Y ) ⊆ S11(X, Y )).
Since VA(S00(X, Y )) = ∅ and VA(S11(X, Y )) = (P, P ) we have the set inclusions
VA(S00(X, Y )) ⊆ VA(xi = yi), VA(S11(X, Y )) ⊆ VA(xi = yi).
By the properties of the variables xi, yi,
S00(X, Y ), S′
11(X, Y ) ⊆ S11(X, Y ) the inclusions
VA(S′
00(X, Y )) ⊆ VA(xi = yi), VA(S′
11(X, Y )) ⊆ VA(xi = yi)
for any finite subsystem S′
00(X, Y ) ⊆
do not hold. Thus, A is not qω-compact.
Let us give examples of qω- and uω-compact algebras.
1. Let Ls(C) denote the semigroup language extended by a countable set of constant
symbols C = {ci i ∈ N}. Below we define three C-semilattices A, B, C such that
A /∈ Q, B ∈ Q \ U, C ∈ U \ N.
Let us consider a linearly ordered C-semilattice A which consists of the elements
{ai i ∈ N}, ai < ai+1, cA
i = ai. There exists an E0-system S = {x ≥ ci i ∈ N}
over A (obviously, VA(S) = ∅), therefore Theorem 19.2 states A /∈ Q.
Let us add to A two non-constant elements b1, b2 with b1 < b2, ai < bj for all i, j
and denote the obtained linearly ordered C-semilattice by B. The system S defined
above is neither an E0- nor E1-system over B, since VB(S) = {b1, b2}. In [6] it was
proved that B ∈ Q. However, S is an E2-system, therefore Theorem 19.2 gives
B /∈ U.
Let us add to B a countable number of non-constant elements b3, b4, . . . , such that
bi < bi+1 (i ∈ N), ai < bj for all i, j, and denote the obtained linearly ordered
C-semilattice by C. Remark that the system S is not an Ek-system over C for any
k ∈ N, since VB(S) = {b1, b2, . . .}. Actually, in [6] it was proved that C ∈ U.
2. There exists examples of qω- and uω-compact algebras in the languages with no
constants. For instance, in [95] it was proved that the “Plotkin’s monster” (the
direct product of all finitely generated group in the standard group language Lg) is
55
qω-compact but not equationally Noetherian. The existence of a group from U \ N
follows from the following statement.
Theorem 19.3.
uω-compact L-algebra B.
[3] For any L-algebra A there exists an embedding of A into a
An L-algebra A is called consistently Noetherian if any consistent L-system S is equiv-
alent to its finite subsystem. The class of all consistently Noetherian L-algebras is denoted
by Nc.
In general, Nc does not coincide with N, since we have the following statement.
Theorem 19.4. [18] Let F be the free Diophantine C-semilattice of infinite rank (recall
that F is isomorphic to the class of all finite subsets of some infinite set relative to the
operation of set union). Then F ∈ Nc \ N (in other words, any consistent system over
F is equivalent to its finite subsystem, but there exists an infinite inconsistent system S
such that all finite subsystem of S are consistent.
There are classes of L-algebras where the equality Nc = N holds. For example, one
can consider any class of L-algebras C such that the empty set is not algebraic over any
L-algebra A ∈ C (the class of all groups of the language Lg satisfies this property). In this
case all L-systems are consistent and the definition of the class Nc becomes the definition
of equationally Noetherian algebras. On the other hand, there exist classes of L-algebras
with N = Nc, where the empty set is algebraic (see [8] where we study Boolean algebras
in the language with constants).
An L-algebra A is weakly equationally Noetherian if for any L-system S there exists a
finite equivalent system S0 (we do not claim now for S0 to be a subsystem of S). The class
of all weakly equationally Noetherian L-algebras is denoted by N′. Obviously, N ⊆ N′.
Proposition 19.5.
L-algebra A then A ∈ Nc implies A ∈ N′.
If the empty set is the solution set of some finite system over an
Proof. Suppose an L-algebra A is consistently Noetherian, and S is an infinite L-system
over A. If S is consistent, S is equivalent to its finite subsystem. Otherwise ( VA(S) = ∅),
the condition provides the existence of a finite inconsistent system S0 ∼A S.
Proposition 19.6. For L-algebras we have
Q ∩ N′ = N.
Proof. Since the definitions of the classes above immediately give N ⊆ Q, N ⊆ N′, then
N ⊆ Q ∩ N′. Let us prove the converse inclusion. Let an L-algebra A is qω-compact and
weakly equationally Noetherian. Consider an infinite L-system S over A. Since A ∈ N′,
S is equivalent to a some finite system {ti(X) = si(X) 1 ≤ i ≤ n}. Therefore, for each
equation ti(X) = si(X) it holds
VA(S) ⊆ VA(ti(X) = si(X)).
Since A is qω-compact, for each equation ti(X) = si(X) there exists a finite subsystem
Si ⊆ S with
VA(Si) ⊆ VA(ti(X) = si(X)).
i=1 Si be a finite subsystem of S. By the choice of each Si it is easy to prove
that S′ is equivalent to S over A. Thus, A is equationally Noetherian.
Let S′ =Sn
56
In conclusion we give a picture which shows the inclusions of the classes N, N′, U, Q.
Q U N N′
Fig. 1.
19.1 Comments
The concept of qω-compact (uω-compact) algebra was given in [3] as a maximal class
where Unifying Theorem 15.1 (respectively, both Unifying Theorems 15.1, 15.2) remains
true. Remark that in [95] it was used the equivalent to the qω-compactness definition of
“logically Noetherian algebras”.
Let us refer to papers devoted to qω- and uω-compact algebras. In [95] it was defined
the “Plotkin’s monster”, i.e. a qω-compact but not equationally Noetherian group of the
language Lg. Thus, the classes Q, N are distinct in the variety of groups. The examples
of algebras from the classes Q \ N, Q \ U, U \ N can be found in [71, 6]. In [71] the
examples were given in the language of infinite number of unary functions, while in [6] we
find examples in the class of C-semilattices of the language Ls(C).
The paper [71] gives the necessary conditions of qω- and uω-compactness (see Theo-
rem 19.2), therefore there arises a question: for what classes of L-algebras such conditions
are sufficient? This problem was solved positively for Boolean algebras of the language
LC−bool = {∨, ∧, ¬, 0, 1} ∪ {ci i ∈ I} extended by constants (see [8]) and for linearly
ordered semilattices of the language Ls(C) ([7]).
Let us note the paper [129] by M. Shahryari where the qω-compactness of an L-algebra
A was described as a property of the lattice of congruences over A.
20 Advances of algebraic geometry and further read-
ing
In this section we give a brief survey of papers devoted to equations over some algebras
and recommend papers for the further reading.
20.1 Further reading
As we mentioned in Introduction, our lectures notes are based on the series of papers [1]–
[5] by DMR. Therefore, we strongly recommend you to read these papers. Let us give the
content of each paper [1]–[5].
1. The first paper [1] develops universal algebraic geometry. The main disadvantage
of this paper is the fundamental division of algebraic geometry into two parts:
“equations without constants” and “equations with constants”. Thus, the paper
becomes complicated. This disadvantage was eliminated in the second paper [2].
57
2. The second paper [2] of the series contains the main definitions of universal algebraic
geometry (algebraic sets, coordinate algebras, equationally Noetherian property). It
generalizes the results of the first paper [1], since the authors use the apt approach in
the study of algebraic geometry. We follow this paper in all sections of our lectures
notes. Thus, the reader may omit the paper [1] and begin the study of universal
algebraic geometry with [2].
3. The paper [3] contains the definitions of qω-, uω-compact and weakly equationally
Noetherian algebras and studies the properties of such classes. We follow this paper
in Section 19.
4. The paper [4] contains the descriptions of equational domains and co-domains. We
used some results in Sections 12, 18.
5. The paper [5] deals with predicate languages and develops their algebraic geometry.
Our paper [20] applies the ideas of [5] to algebraic structures equipped the relation
6=.
Moreover, the papers by M. Shahryari, P. Modabberi, H. Khodabandeh [128, 86, 129,
130, 70] continue the study of general problems of universal algebraic geometry.
20.2 Groups
Firstly, we recommend the survey [124] by V. Romankov devoted to equational problems
in groups.
Free and hyperbolic groups.
The algebraic geometry over free groups was studied in many papers. We refer only
the principal ones [74, 23, 25, 29, 75, 102, 103, 51, 125, 126, 127, 88, 90, 105, 66, 67, 68, 69].
The papers [66, 67, 68] contain the description of coordinate groups over the free
group F Gn of rank n. Precisely, it was proved that a finitely generated group G is the
coordinate group of an irreducible algebraic set over F Gn iff F Gn is embedded into the
Lindon‘s group F Z[t]. On the other hand, in [125, 126, 127] it was obtained the description
of limit groups over F Gn. According to Unifying theorems, the results of [125, 126, 127]
gives the another description of irreducible coordinate groups over F Gn.
The class of hyperbolic groups is close the class of free groups. The algebraic geometry
over hyperbolic groups was studied in [27, 53, 54, 56, 55].
Partially commutative groups.
Algebraic geometries over partially commutative groups in several varieties were stud-
ied in [30, 31, 32, 60, 61, 62, 83, 84, 85, 132, 133].
Nilpotent, solvable and metabelian groups.
Interesting and nontrivial results about equations in free metabelian group were
obtained in the following papers [34, 106, 107, 108, 110, 111, 112, 117]. The pa-
pers [59, 91, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123] are devoted to the algebraic geometry over
solvable groups.
20.3 Semigroups
The description of coordinate C-monoids over the Diophantine C-monoid of natural num-
bers was obtained in [10, 9]. The consistency of systems of equations over N was studied
58
in [72], and there were found the necessary and sufficient condition for a system of equa-
tions over N to be consistent.
In [17] it was developed the algorithm that for a given
system S and an equation t(X) = s(X) determines whether t(X) = s(X) belongs to the
radical RadN(S) or not. Moreover, in [17] we offer the algorithm that for a given system
S over N finds the irreducible components of VN(S).
The paper [134] contains the description of coordinate semigroup in various classes of
completely simple semigroups.
In [18] the irreducible coordinate C-semilattices over the Diophantine free C-
semilattice were described.
A left regular band is a semigroup which satisfies the following identities
∀x xx = x, ∀x∀y xyx = xy.
Let F LRn denote the free left regular semigroup of rank n. Actually, in [77] it was proved
that F LRn, F LRm are geometrically equivalent to each other, and the list of axioms of
qvar(F LRn) was obtained. In [19] we described all finite subsemigroups of F LRn (since
the variety of left regular semigroups is locally finite, we actually describe irreducible
coordinate semigroups over F LRn).
20.4 Algebras
The papers [35, 43, 44, 45, 46, 48, 101, 109, 116] are devoted to algebraic geometry over Lie
algebras. Let us refer to the paper [109], where it was proved that even simple equations
over free Lie algebra have the complicated solution sets. Thus, it is impossible to obtain a
nice description of all coordinate algebras of algebraic sets over free Lie algebras. However,
in [48] it was obtained the description of bounded algebraic sets over free Lie algebras.
Surprisingly, the solution sets of linear equations in free anti-commutative algebra is
simpler than the corresponding sets over free Lie algebra (see [47]).
References
[1] E. Daniyarova, A. Miasnikov, V. Remeslennikov, Unification theorems in algebraic
geometry, Algebra and Discrete Mathematics, 1, 2008, 80–111.
[2] E. Yu. Daniyarova, A. G. Myasnikov, V. N. Remeslennikov, Algebraic geometry
over algebraic structures. II. Foundations, J. Math. Sci., 185:3 (2012), 389–416
[3] E. Daniyarova, A. Miasnikov, V. Remeslennikov, Algebraic geometry over algebraic
structures III: Equationally Noetherian property and compactness, South. Asian
Bull. Math., 35:1, 2011, 35–68.
[4] Daniyarova E.Y., Remeslennikov V.N., Myasnikov A.G., Algebraic geometry over
algebraic structures. iv. equational domains and codomains, Algebra and Logic, 49:6
(2011), 483–508.
[5] Daniyarova, E. Yu.; Myasnikov, A. G.; Remeslennikov, V. N., Algebraic geometry
over algebraic structures. V. The case of arbitrary signature, Algebra and logic, 51:1
(2012), DOI: 10.1007/s10469-012-9168-7 , 28–40.
59
[6] A. N. Shevlyakov, Commutative idempotent semigroups at the service of the uni-
versal algebraic geometry, Southeast Asian Bulletin of Mathematics, 35, (2011),
111-136.
[7] A. N. Shevlyakov A. N., Algebraic geometry over linear ordered semilattices, Algebra
and Model Theory 8, eds. A.G. Pinus, K.N. Ponimarev, S.V. Sudoplatov and E.I.
Timoshenko, Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk (2011), 116–131
[8] A. N. Shevlyakov, Algebraic geometry over Boolean algebras in the language with
constants, J. Math. Sci., 206:6 (2015), 742–757, arXiv:1305.6844 [math.MR].
[9] A. Shevlyakov, Algebraic geometry over the monoid of natural numbers. Irreducible
algebraic sets, Proceedings of the Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics (Trudy
Instituta Matematiki I Mekhaniki), 16:2 (2010), 258–269.
[10] A. N. Shevlyakov, Algebraic geometry over the additive monoid of natural numbers:
The classifcation of coordinate monoids, Groups, Complexity and Cryptology, 2(1),
(2010), 91–111.
[11] A. N. Shevlyakov, On disjunction of equations in the semigroup language with no
constants, Herald of Omsk University, 4 (2013), 60–62, arXiv:1306.4543 [math.AG].
[12] A. N. Shevlyakov, On disjunction of equations in inverse semigroups, Herald of
Omsk University, 4 (2013), 63–66, arXiv:1306.4545 [math.AG].
[13] A. N. Shevlyakov, Unifying solutions to systems of equations in finite simple semi-
groups, Algebra and Logic, 53:1 (2014), 70–83, arXiv:1305.6843 [math.RA].
[14] A. N. Shevlyakov, On disjunctions of algebraic sets in completely simple semigroups,
Algebra and logic to appear, arXiv:1406.4572 [math.AG].
[15] A. N. Shevlyakov, On disjunctions of equations over semigroups, arXiv:1305.6842
[math.RA].
[16] A.N. Shevlyakov, On disjunction of equations in completely regular semigroups,
Herald of Omsk University, 3 (2014), 18–21 (Russian), arXiv:1306.4547 [math.AG].
[17] A.N. Shevlyakov, Nullstellensatz and the additive monoid of natural numbers, Her-
ald of Omsk University, 2 (2011), 49–55 (Russian).
[18] A. N. Shevlyakov, Elements of algebraic geometry over a free semilattice, Algebra
and Logic, 54:3 (2015), 258–271, arXiv:1401.2608v1 [math.AG].
[19] A. N. Shevlyakov,
Finite
arXiv:1406.3429v5 [math.AG].
subsemigroups
of
free
left
regular
bands,
[20] A. N. Shevlyakov, Universal algebraic geometry with relation 6=, Algebra and Logic,
to appear.
[21] S. G. Afanaseva, The Coordinate Group of an Affine Space Over a Rigid Metabelian
Pro-p-group, Algebra and Logic, 2014, 53:3, 187–190.
[22] E. Alibegovich. Makanin-Razborov diagrams for limit groups, Geometric Topology
11 (2007), 643–666.
60
[23] K. I. Appel, One-variable equations in free groups, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 19
(1968), 912–918.
[24] M. Barr, C. Wells, Toposes, triples and theories, Theory and Applications of Cate-
gories, 1 (2005), 1–289.
[25] B. Baumslag, Residually free groups, Proc. London Math. Soc., 17 (3) (1967),
402–418.
[26] G. Baumslag, A. Myasnikov, V. Remeslennikov, Algebraic geometry over groups I:
Algebraic sets and ideal theory, J. Algebra, 219 (1999), 16–79,
[27] G. Baumslag, A. Myasnikov, V. Remeslennikov, Discriminating completions of hy-
perbolic groups, Geometriae Dedicata, 92 (2002), 115–143.
[28] G. Baumslag, A. Myasnikov, V. Romankov, Two theorems about equationally
Noetherian groups, J. Algebra, 194 (1997), 654–664.
[29] R. Bryant, The verbal topology of a group, J. Algebra, 48 (1977), 340–346.
[30] M. Casals-Ruiz, I. Kazachkov, Elements of algebraic geometry and the positive
theory of partially commutative groups, to appear in Canadian J. Mathematics
[31] M. Casals-Ruiz, I. Kazachkov, On systems of equations over free partially commu-
tative groups, Preprint.
[32] M. Casals-Ruiz, I. Kazachkov, On systems of equations over free products of groups,
Preprint.
[33] C. Champetier, V. Guirardel, Limit groups as limits of free groups: Compactifying
the set of free groups, Israel J. Math., 146 (2005), 1–76.
[34] O. Chapuis, ∀- free metabelian groups, J. Symbolic Logic, 62 (1997), 159–174.
[35] I. V. Chirkov , M. A. Shevelin, Zero Divisors in Amalgamated Free Products of Lie
Algebras, Siberian Mathematical Journal, 2004, 45:1, 188–195.
[36] I. M. Chiswell, V. N. Remeslennikov, Equations in free groups with one variable,
J. Group Theory, 3 (4) (2000), 445-466.
[37] L.P. Comerford, Jr., C.C. Edmunds, Solutions of equations in free groups, Group
Theory: Proc. of the 1987 Singapore Conference, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New
York (1989), 347–356.
[38] L.P. Comerford, Jr., C.C. Edmunds, Quadratic equations over free groups and free
products, J. Algebra 68 (1981), 276–297.
[39] L.P. Comerford, Jr., C.C. Edmunds, The solvability of quadratic equations in free
products of free groups with cyclic amalgamation, J. Indian Math. Soc. 50 (1986),
213–252.
[40] L.P. Comerford, Jr., C.C. Edmunds, Genus of powers in a free group, Geometric
Group Theory, Eds.: Charney, Davis, Shapiro, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York
(1995), 67–71.
61
[41] F. Dahmani, Existencial quotients in (relatively) hyperbolic groups, Israel J. Math.
[42] Daniyarova E.Yu., Algebraic geometry over Lie algebras: foundations, Herald of
Omsk University, Special edition:Combinatorial methods of algebra and complexity
(2007), 8–39.
[43] Daniyarova E.Yu., Kazatchkov I.V., Remeslennikov V.N., Algebraic geometry over
free metabelian lie algebras I. u-algebras and universal classes, Journal of Mathe-
matical Sciences, 135:5 (2006), 3292–3310.
[44] Daniyarova E.Yu., Kazatchkov I.V., Remeslennikov V.N., Algebraic geometry over
free metabelian lie algebras II. finite-field case, Journal of Mathematical Sciences,
135:5 (2006), 3311–3326.
[45] Daniyarova E.Yu., Algebraic geometry over free metabelian Lie algebra III: Q-
algebras and the coordinate algebras of algebraic sets, Preprint, Omsk (2005), 1–130
(Russian).
[46] Daniyarova E.Yu., Kazatchkov I.V., Remeslennikov V.N., Semidomains and
metabelian product of metabelian lie algebras, Journal of Mathematical Sciences,
131:6 (2005), 6015–6022.
[47] Daniyarova E.Yu., Onskul’ I.V., Linear and bilinear equations over free anti-
commutative algebras, Herald of Omsk University, Special edition: Combinatorial
methods of algebra and complexity (2008), 38–49 (Russian).
[48] E. Yu. Daniyarova, V. N. Remeslennikov, Bounded Algebraic Geometry over a Free
Lie Algebra, Algebra and Logic, 44:3 (2005), 148–167.
[49] Dvorzhezki Yu.S., Kotov M.V., The min-max algebraic strucures, Herald of Omsk
University, Special edition: Combinatorial methods of algebra and complexity
(2008), 130–136 (Russian).
[50] A. Gaglione, D. Spellman, Some model theory of free groups and free algebras,
Houston J. Math., 19 (1993), 327–356.
[51] R. I. Grigorchuk, P. F. Kurchanov, On quadratic equations in free groups, Contemp.
Math., 131 (1) (1992), 159–171.
[52] P. Grillet, Commutative Semigroups, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2001,
436
[53] D. Groves, Limits of (certain) CAT(0) groups, I: Compactification, Algebraic and
Geometric Topology, 5 (2005), 1325–1364.
[54] D. Groves, Limits of (certain) CAT(0) groups, II: The Hopf property and the
shortening argument, Preprint, 2004.
[55] D. Groves,
Limit groups for relatively hyperbolic groups, I: The basic tools,
Preprint, 2008.
[56] D. Groves, Limit groups for relatively hyperbolic groups, II: Makanin-Razborov
diagrams, Geometry and Topology, 9 (2005), 2319–2358.
62
[57] V. Guba, Equivalence of infinite systems of equations in free groups and semigroups
to finite subsystems, Mat. Zametki, 40 (3) (1986), 321–324.
[58] V. Guirardel, Limit groups and group acting freely on Rn-trees, Geometry and
Topology, 8 (2004), 1427–1470.
[59] Ch. K. Gupta, N. S. Romanovskii, The property of being equationally Noetherian
for some soluble groups, Algebra and Logic, 2007, 46:1, 2836.
[60] Ch. K. Gupta, E. I. Timoshenko, Partially commutative metabelian groups: cen-
tralizers and elementary equivalence, Algebra and Logic, 48:3 (2009), 173–192.
[61] Ch. K. Gupta, E. I. Timoshenko, Universal theories for partially commutative
metabelian groups, Algebra and Logic, 50:1 (2011), 1–16.
[62] Ch. K. Gupta, E. I. Timoshenko, Properties and universal theories for partially
commutative nilpotent metabelian groups, Algebra and Logic, 51:4 (2012), 285–
305.
[63] T. Harju, J. Karhumaki, M. Petrich, Compactness of systems of equations on com-
pletely regular semigroups, Structures in Logic and Computer Science, LNCS 1261,
268–280. Springer, Berlin, 1997.
[64] T. Harju, J. Karhumaki, W. Plandowski, Compactness of systems of equations in
semigroups, International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming,
(ICALP 1995, Szeged, Hungary) LNCS 944, 444454, Springer, 1995.
[65] E. Hrushovski, The Mordell-Lang conjecture for function fields, J. Amer Math.
Soc., 9 (1996), 667–690.
[66] O. Kharlampovich, A. Myasnikov,
Irreducible affine varieties over free group I: Ir-
reducibility of quadratic equations and Nullstellensatz, J. Algebra, 200 (2) (1998),
472–516.
[67] O. Kharlampovich, A. Myasnikov,
Irreducible affine varieties over free group II:
Systems in trangular quasi-quadratic form and description of residually free groups,
J. Algebra, 200 (2) (1998), 517–570.
[68] O. Kharlampovich, A. Myasnikov, Algebraic geometry over free groups: Lifting
solutions into generic points, Contemp. Math., 378 (2005), 213–318.
[69] O. Kharlampovich, A. Myasnikov, Elementary theory of free nonabelian groups,
J. Algebra, 302 (2) (2006), 451–552.
[70] H. Khodabandeh, M. Shahryari Equations in polyadic groups, arXiv:1508.07726.
[71] M. V. Kotov, Equationally Noetherian property and close properties, Southeast
Asian Bulletin of Mathematics, Southeast Asian Bulletin of Mathematics, 35:3
(2011), 419–429.
[72] Kryvyi S. L. Compatibility of systems of linear equations over the set of natural
numbers // Cybernetics and Systems Analysis. V. 38. 2002. 1. . 17-28.
[73] M. Lothaire, Combinatorics on words, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Appli-
cations 17, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Mass, 1983.
63
[74] R. C. Lyndon, Groups with parametric exponents, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 96
(1960), 518–533.
[75] G. S. Makanin, Equations in a free group, Math. USSR-Izv., 21:3 (1983), 483–546.
[76] G. S. Makanin, Decidability of the universal and positive theories of a free group,
Math. USSR-Izv., 25:1 (1985), 75–88.
[77] S. Margolis, F. Saliola, B. Steinberg, Semigroups embeddable in hyperplane
monoids, Semigroup Forum, August 2014, 89 (1), 236–248.
[78] D. Marker, Model theory: An introduction, Springer-Verlag New York, 2002.
[79] W. Maurer, J. Rhodes, A property of finite simple non-abelian groups, Proc. Am.
Math. Soc., 16 (1965), 552–554
[80] J. McCool, A. Pietrowski, Some finitely presented subgroups for the automorphism
group of a free group, J. Algebra, 35 (1975), 205–213.
[81] S.G. Melesheva, Equations and algebraic geometry over profinite groups, Algebra
and Logic, 2010, 49:5, 444455.
[82] A. A. Mishchenko, A.V. Treyer, Commutation graphs for partially commutative
Q-groups of nilpotency class 2, Siberian Elect. Math. Rev., 4 (2007), . 460–481.
[83] A. A. Mishchenko, The universal equivalnce of partially commutative Q-groups
of nilpotency class 2, Herald of Omsk University, Special edition: Combinatorial
methods of algebra and complexity (2008), 61–68 (Russian).
[84] A. A. Mishchenko, Structure of coordinate groups for algebraic sets in partially
commutative nilpotent groups, Algebra and Logic, 48:3 (2009), 214–227.
[85] A. A. Mishchenko, E. I. Timoshenko, Universal equivalence of partially commutative
nilpotent groups, Siberian Math. J., 52:5 (2011), 884–891.
[86] P. Modabberi, M. Shahryari Equational Conditions in Universal Algebraic Geome-
try, arXiv:1401.4389.
[87] P. Morar, A. Shevlyakov, Algebraic geometry over additive positive monoids. Sys-
tems of coefficient free equations, Combinatorial and Geometric Group Theory:
Dortmund and Carleton Conferences (2010), 261–278.
[88] A. Myasnikov, V. Remeslennikov, Exponential groups 2: Extension of centralizers
and tensor completion of CSA-groups, International J. Algebra and Computation,
6 (6) (1996), 687–711.
[89] A. Myasnikov, V. Remeslennikov, Algebraic geometry over groups II: Logical foun-
dations, J. Algebra, 234 (2000), 225–276.
[90] A. Myasnikov, V. Remeslennikov, D. Serbin, Regular free length functions on Lyn-
don’s free Z(t)- group F Z(t), Contemp. Math., 378 (2005), 37–77.
[91] A. Myasnikov, N. Romanovskii, Krull dimension of solvable groups, Preprint, 2008.
64
[92] A. G. Myasnikov, N. S. Romanovskii, Universal theories for rigid soluble groups,
Algebra and Logic, 2012, 50:6, 539–552.
[93] B. Plotkin, Varieties of algebras and algebraic varieties. Categories of algebraic
varieties, Siberian Advances in Math., 7 (2) (1997), 64–97.
[94] B. Plotkin, Varieties of algebras and algebraic varieties, Izrael J. Math., 96 (2)
(1996), 511–522.
[95] B. Plotkin, Algebras with the same (algebraic) geometry, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math.,
242 (2003), 165–196,
[96] B. Plotkin,
Seven lectures on the universal algebraic geometry, (2002), arXiv:
math/0204245[math.GM].
[97] B. Plotkin, Geometrical equivalence, geometrical similarity and geometrical com-
putability of algebras, . . . -. - . - . . .
(), 330, (2006), 201–222.
[98] B. Plotkin, Some results and problems related to universal algebraic geometry, Int.
J. Algebra Comput., 17:56 (2007), 1133–1164.
[99] B. Plotkin, E. Plotkin, A. Tsurkov, Geometrical equivalence of groups, Commun.
Algebra, 24 (1999), 4015–4025.
[100] B.I. Plotkin, Some concepts of algebraic geometry in universal algebra, St. Peters-
burg Mathematical Journal, 1998, 9:4, 859–879.
[101] E. N. Poroshenko, E. I. Timoshenko, Universal equivalence of partially commutative
metabelian Lie algebras, Journal of Algebra, 384 (2013), 143–168
[102] A. Razborov, On systems of equations in a free groups, Combinatorial and geomet-
ric group theory, Edinburgh (1993), Cambridge University Press (1995), 269–283.
[103] A. A. Razborov, On systems of equations in a free group, Math. USSR-Izv., 25:1
(1985), 115–162.
[104] A. Razborov, On the parametrization of solutions for equations in free groups,
Intern. J. Algebra Comp. 3 (1993), 251–273.
[105] V. N. Remeslennikov, ∃-free groups, Sib. Math. J., 30:6 (1989), 998–1001.
[106] V. N. Remeslennikov, Dimensions of algebraic sets over free metabelian groups,
Fund. i. Prikl. Math, 7 (2001), 873–885 (Russian).
[107] V. Remeslennikov, R. Stohr, On the quasivariety generated by a non-cyclic free
metabelian group, Algebra Colloq., 11 (2004), 191–214.
[108] V. Remeslennikov, R. Stohr, On algebraic sets over metabelian groups, J. Group
Theory, 8 (2005), 491–513.
[109] V. Remeslennikov, R. Stohr, The equation [x, u] + [y, v] = 0 in free Lie algebras,
Intern. J. Algebra and Computation, 17 (5/6) (2007), 1165–1187.
[110] V. N. Remeslennikov, N. S. Romanovskii, Metabelian Products of Groups, Algebra
and Logic, 43:3 (2004), 190–197.
65
[111] V. N. Remeslennikov, N. S. Romanovskii, Irreducible Algebraic Sets in Metabelian
Groups, Algebra and Logic, 44:5 (2005), 336–347.
[112] V. N. Remeslennikov, E. I. Timoshenko, Topological dimensions for u-groups,
Siberian Math. J., 47:2 (2006), 341–354.
[113] E. Rips, Commutator equations in free groups, Israel J. Math. 39 (1981), 326–340.
[114] E. Rips, Z. Sela, Canonical representatives and equations in hyperbolic groups,
Invent. Math. 120 (1995), 480–512.
[115] B. Rosenblat, On equations in inverse semigroups, Algebra Universalis, vol. 47, 2,
2002, 153–156.
[116] Romanovskiy N. S., Syhestakov I.P., Noetherianness of wreath products of Abelian
Lie algebras with respect to equations of universal enveloping algebra, Algebra and
Logic, 2008, 47:4, 269–278.
[117] Romanovskiy N. S., Algebraic sets in metabelian groups, Algebra and Logic, 2007,
46:4, 274–280.
[118] Romanovskiy N. S., Equational Noetherianness of rigid soluble groups, Algebra
and Logic, 2009, 48:2, 147–160.
[119] Romanovskiy N. S., Irreducible algebraic sets over divisible decomposed rigid
groups, Algebra and Logic, 2009, 48:6, 449–464.
[120] Romanovskiy N. S., Coproducts of rigid groups, Algebra and Logic, 2010, 49:6,
539–550.
[121] Romanovskiy N. S., Universal theories for free solvable groups, Algebra and Logic,
2012, 51:3, 259–263.
[122] Romanovskiy N. S., Irreducibility of an affine space in algebraic geometry over a
group, Algebra and Logic, 2013, 52:3, 262–265.
[123] Romanovskiy N. S., Hilbert’s Nullstellensatz in algebraic geometry over rigid soluble
groups, Izvestiya: Mathematics, 2015, 79:5, 1051–1063.
[124] V. A. Roman’kov, Equations over groups, Groups Complex. Cryptol., 4:2 (2012),
191–239.
[125] Z. Sela, Diophantine geometry over groups I: Makanin-Razborov diagrams, Publi-
cations Mathematiques de l’IHES, 93 (2001), 31–105.
[126] Z. Sela, Diophantine geometry over groups VI: The elementary theory of a free
group, GAFA, 16 (2006), 707–730.
[127] Z. Sela, Diophantine geometry over groups VII: The elementary theory of a hyper-
bolic group, Preprint.
[128] M. Shahryari
Equational Noetherian Algebras
and Chain Conditions,
arXiv:1308.3451.
[129] M. Shahryari A new characterization of qω-compact algebras, arXiv:1508.00325.
66
[130] M. Shahryari Algebraic sets with fully characteristic radicals, arXiv:1508.03128.
[131] W. Szmielew, Elementary properties of Abelian groups, Fundam. math., 41(2),
(1955), 203–271.
[132] E. I. Timoshenko, Universal equivalence of partially commutative metabelian
groups, Algebra and Logic, 49:2 (2010), 177–196 .
[133] E. I. Timoshenko, Quasivarieties generated by partially commutative groups,
Sibirian Mathematical Journal, 54:4 (2013), 722–730.
[134] P. A. Ulyashev, On algebraic geometry over completely simple semigroups, Herald
of Omsk University, 4(74), (2014), 37–40 (Russian).
67
|
1803.09908 | 1 | 1803 | 2018-03-27T06:03:09 | Free hyperplane arrangements over arbitrary fields | [
"math.AG",
"math.AC",
"math.CO"
] | In this paper, we study the class of free hyperplane arrangements. Specifically, we investigate the relations between freeness over a field of finite characteristic and freeness over $\mathbb{Q}$. | math.AG | math |
FREE HYPERPLANE ARRANGEMENTS OVER ARBITRARY
FIELDS
ELISA PALEZZATO AND MICHELE TORIELLI
ABSTRACT. In this paper, we study the class of free hyperplane arrange-
ments. Specifically, we investigate the relations between freeness over a
field of finite characteristic and freeness over Q.
CONTENTS
Introduction
1.
2. Preliminares on hyperplane arrangements
3. Free hyperplane arrangements
4. From characteristic 0 to characteristic p
5. Homogeneous ideals in Z[x1, . . . , xl]
6. From characteristic p to characteristic 0
7. Applications
References
1
2
3
6
7
11
12
13
1. INTRODUCTION
Let V be a vector space of dimension l over a field K. Fix a system of
coordinate (x1, . . . , xl) of V ∗. We denote by S = S(V ∗) = K[x1, . . . , xl]
the symmetric algebra. A hyperplane arrangement A = {H1, . . . , Hn} is a
finite collection of hyperplanes in V .
Freeness of an arrangement is a key notion which connects arrangement
theory with algebraic geometry and combinatorics. The study of free ar-
rangements was started by Saito [13] and a remarkable factorization theo-
rem was proved by Terao [15]. This theorem asserts that the characteristic
polynomial of a free arrangement completely factors into linear polynomi-
als over the integers. This imposes a necessary condition on the structure
of the intersection lattice for an arrangement to be free. The Terao con-
jecture is the converse problem, i.e.
to understand if the structure of the
intersection lattice characterize freeness of arrangements. A lot of work has
done to solve this conjecture especially in the case of characteristic 0 (see
Date: November 9, 2018.
1
2
ELISA PALEZZATO AND MICHELE TORIELLI
for example [17], [18], [3], [1] and [6]). However, also the case of finite
characteristic has been analyzed (see for example [16] and [19]). Despite
this effort, this question is still open.
The purpose of this paper is to study the connections between freeness
over a field of characteristic zero and over a finite field, and to describe in
which cases the two situations are related and how.
2. PRELIMINARES ON HYPERPLANE ARRANGEMENTS
In this section, we recall the terminology, the basic notations and some
fundamental results related to hyperplane arrangements.
Let K be a field. A finite set of affine hyperplanes A = {H1, . . . , Hn}
in K l is called a hyperplane arrangement. For each hyperplane Hi we
fix a defining equation αi ∈ S = K[x1, . . . , xl] such that Hi = α−1
i (0),
i=1 αi. An arrangement A is called central if each Hi
contains the origin of K l. In this case, the defining equation αi ∈ S is linear
homogeneous, and hence Q(A) is homogeneous of degree n.
and let Q(A) = Qn
Let L(A) = {TH∈B H B ⊆ A} be the lattice of intersection of A,
ordered by reverse inclusion, i.e. X ≤ Y if and only if Y ⊆ X, for X, Y ∈
L(A). Define a rank function on L(A) by rk(X) = codim(X). L(A)
plays a fundamental role in the study of hyperplane arrangements, in fact it
determines the combinatorics of the arrangement.
Let µ : L(A) −→ Z be the Mobius function of L(A) defined by
Definition 2.1. The characteristic polynomial of A is defined by
µ(X) =(1
−PY <X µ(Y )
χ(A, t) = XX∈L(A)
for X = K l,
if X > K l.
µ(X)tdim(X).
The importance of the characteristic polynomial in combinatorics is jus-
tified by the following result from [7], [10] and [20].
Theorem 2.2. We have that
(1) If A is an arrangement in Fl
(2) If A is an arrangement in Cl, then the topological i-th Betti number
p \SH∈A H = χ(A, p).
p, then Fl
of the complement is bi(Cl \SH∈A H) = bi(A).
(3) If A is an arrangement in Rl, then χ(A, −1) is the number of
chambers and χ(A, 1) is the number of bounded chambers.
FREE HYPERPLANE ARRANGEMENTS OVER ARBITRARY FIELDS
3
3. FREE HYPERPLANE ARRANGEMENTS
We recall the basic notions and properties of free hyperplane arrange-
ments.
We denote by DerK l = {Pl
mial vector fields on K l (or S-derivations). Let δ = Pl
i=1 fi∂xi fi ∈ S} the S-module of polyno-
i=1 fi∂xi ∈ DerK l.
Then δ is said to be homogeneous of polynomial degree d if f1, . . . , fl
are homogeneous polynomials of degree d in S.
In this case, we write
pdeg(δ) = d.
Definition 3.1. Let A be a central arrangement in K l. Define the module
of vector fields logarithmic tangent to A (or logarithmic vector fields) by
D(A) = {δ ∈ DerK l δ(αi) ∈ (αi)S, ∀i}.
The module D(A) is obviously a graded S-module and we have that
D(A) = {δ ∈ DerK l δ(Q(A)) ∈ (Q(A))S}. In particular, since the ar-
i=1 xi∂xi belongs
to D(A), in fact δE(Q(A)) = nQ(A). In this case, if the characteristic of
K does not divide n, we can write D(A) ∼= S·δE ⊕ D0(A), where
rangement A is central, then the Euler vector field δE =Pl
D0(A) = {δ ∈ DerK l δ(Q(A)) = 0}.
Definition 3.2. A central arrangement A in K l is said to be free with ex-
ponents (e1, . . . , el) if and only if D(A) is a free S-module and there ex-
ists a basis δ1, . . . , δl ∈ D(A) such that pdeg(δi) = ei, or equivalently
D(A) ∼=Ll
i=1 S(−ei).
In general the exponents of an arrangement depend on the characteristic
of K. In fact, we have the following examples.
Example 3.3 ([11], Example 4.35). Consider the arrangement A in K 3
with defining equation Q(A) = xyz(x − y)(x + z)(y + z)(x + y + z). Then
A is free for any K, but its exponents depend on the characteristic of K.
If char(K) 6= 2, then A is free with exponents (1, 3, 3), in fact we can
take as basis of D(A) the following vector fields δE, δ2 = x(x + z)(x + y +
z)∂x+y(y+z)(x+y+z)∂y and δ3 = x(x+z)(2y+z)∂x+y(y+z)(2x+z)∂y.
If char(K) = 2, then A is free with exponents (1, 2, 4), in fact we can take
as basis of D(A) the following vector fields δE, δ2 = x2∂x + y2∂y + z2∂z
and δ3 = x4∂x + y4∂y + z4∂z.
Example 3.4. Consider A the arrangement in K 3 as the cone of A[−2,2] the
Shi-Catalan arrangement of type B , see for example [2]. Then A is free for
any K, but its exponents depend on the characteristic of K.
If char(K) = 5, then A is free with exponents [1, 5, 15]. If char(K) = 7,
then A is free with exponents [1, 7, 13]. If char(K) 6= 5, 7, then A is free
with exponents [1, 9, 11].
4
ELISA PALEZZATO AND MICHELE TORIELLI
Remark 3.5. Assume that the characteristic of K does not divide n, then a
central arrangement A is free if and only if D0(A) is a free S-module.
In general, it is important to distinguish between the case that the charac-
teristic of K does not divide n and the case that it does. In the latter, there
might not exist δ ∈ D(A) such that δ(Q(A)) is a non-zero scalar multiple
of Q(A).
Example 3.6. Consider the arrangement A in F3
3 with defining equation
Q(A) = xyz(y + z)(x − y)(x + z). In this case n = 6. Then A is free and
we can take {δE, δ2, δ3} as basis of D(A), where δ2 = (xy − y2)∂y + (xz +
z2)∂z and δ3 = (xyz + xz2 + yz2 + z3)∂z. In this situation, δE(Q(A)) =
δ2(Q(A)) = 0 and δ3(Q(A)) = xQ(A). Hence, there does not exist δ ∈
D(A) such that δ(Q(A)) is a non-zero scalar multiple of Q(A).
Let δ1, . . . , δl ∈ D(A). Then det(δi(xj))i,j is divisible by Q(A). One
of the most famous characterization of freeness is due to Saito [13] and
it uses the determinant of the coefficient matrix of δ1, . . . , δl to check if
the arrangement A is free or not. Notice that the original statement is for
characteristic 0, but in [16] Terao showed that this statement holds true for
any characteristic.
Theorem 3.7 (Saito's criterion). Let A be a central arrangement in K l and
δ1, . . . , δl ∈ D(A). Then the following facts are equivalent
(1) D(A) is free with basis δ1, . . . , δl, i. e. D(A) = S · δ1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ S · δl.
(2) det(δi(xj))i,j = cQ(A), where c ∈ K \ {0}.
i=1 pdeg(δi) = n.
(3) δ1, . . . , δl are linearly independent over S andPl
Given an arrangement A in K l, the Jacobian ideal of A is the ideal of S
generated by Q(A) and all its partial derivatives, and it is denoted by J(A).
This ideal has a central role in the study of free arrangements. In fact, we
can also characterize freeness by looking at the Jacobian ideal of A. This
characterization by Terao [14] will be used in Section 6. Notice that Terao
described this result for characteristic 0, but the same proof also works for
the case that the characteristic does not divide the cardinality of A.
Theorem 3.8 (Terao's criterion). A central arrangement A in K l is free if
and only if S/J(A) is 0 or (l − 2)-dimensional Cohen-Macaulay.
Proof. By Remark 3.5, we need to prove that D0(A) is a free S-module if
and only if S/J(A) is 0 or Cohen-Macaulay.
We have an exact sequence
0
/ D0(A) α
/ Sl
β
/ S
γ
/ S/J(A)
/ 0 ,
/
/
/
/
/
Xi=1
FREE HYPERPLANE ARRANGEMENTS OVER ARBITRARY FIELDS
5
where
α(
l
Xi=1
fi∂/∂xi) = (f1, . . . , fl)t for
l
fi∂/∂xi ∈ D0(A),
l
Xi=1
β((g1, . . . , gl)t) =
gi∂Q(A)/∂xi for (g1, . . . , gl)t ∈ Sl
and γ is the natural projection. Thus D0(A) is free if and only if the homo-
logical dimension of S/J(A) is less than three.
Recall the Auslander-Buchsbaum equality
depth(S/J(A)) + hdim(S/J(A)) = dim(S) = l,
if S/J(A) 6= 0. On the other hand, we have dim(S/J(A)) ≤ l − 2, then
hdim(S/J(A)) ≤ 2
⇔ depth(S/J(A)) ≥ l − 2 ≥ dim(S/J(A))
⇔ depth(S/J(A)) = l − 2 = dim(S/J(A))
⇔ S/J(A) is Cohen-Macaulay of dimension l − 2,
if S/J(A) 6= 0. When S/J(A) = 0, D0(A) is obviously a free S-module.
(cid:3)
Freeness has several consequences. For example we recall the following.
Theorem 3.9. ([15]) Suppose that A is a free arrangement in K l with ex-
ponents (e1, . . . , el). Then
l
χ(A, t) =
(t − ei).
Yi=1
The previous theorem imposes a necessary condition on the structure of
L(A) for the arrangement A to be free. The Terao conjecture is the problem
to ask the converse, i.e if the structure of L(A) characterize freeness of A.
This conjecture is still unsolved. In [19], Yoshinaga gave an affirmative
result when K = Fp and l = 3. Specifically, he proved the following result.
Theorem 3.10. Let A be a central arrangement in F3
facts hold true.
p. Then the following
(1) When A ≥ 2p, A is free if and only if χ(A, p) = 0.
(2) When A = 2p − 1, A is free if and only if either χ(A, p) = 0 or
χ(A, t) = (t − 1)(t − p + 1)2.
(3) When A = 2p − 2, A is free if and only if either χ(A, p) = 0 or
χ(A, t) = (t − 1)(t − p + 1)(t − p + 2).
More in general, in [19], Yoshinaga also proved the following.
6
ELISA PALEZZATO AND MICHELE TORIELLI
Theorem 3.11. Let A be a central arrangement in Fl
then A is free with exponents (1, p, . . . , pl−2, A − 1 − p − · · · − pl−2).
p. If χ(A, pl−2) = 0,
4. FROM CHARACTERISTIC 0 TO CHARACTERISTIC p
From now on we will assume that A = {H1, . . . , Hn} is a central ar-
rangement in Ql. After getting rid of the denominators, we can suppose that
i=1 αi ∈
Z[x1, . . . , xl]. Moreover, we can also assume that there exists no prime
number p that divides any αi.
αi ∈ Z[x1, . . . , xl] for all i = 1, . . . , n, and hence that Q(A) = Qn
Let p be a prime number. Consider the image of Q(A) under the canoni-
cal homomorphism πp : Z[x1, . . . , xl] −→ Fp[x1, . . . , xl].
Definition 4.1. Let A be a central arrangement in Ql. We will call a prime
number p good for A if πp(Q(A)) is reduced.
Lemma 4.2. There is a finite number of primes p that are not good for A.
Proof. We have that πp(Q(A)) is not reduced if and only if πp(αi) = πp(αj)
for some i 6= j and this can happens only for a finite number of primes. (cid:3)
Let now p be a good prime for A, and consider Ap the arrangement in
p defined by πp(Q(A)). Hence, by construction, Q(Ap) = πp(Q(A)) 6= 0
Fl
and it is reduced.
Theorem 4.3. If A is free in Ql with exponents (e1, . . . , el), then Ap is free
in Fl
p with exponents (e1, . . . , el), for all good primes except possibly a finite
number of them.
Proof. Let ∆ = {δ1, . . . , δl} be a basis of D(A) with pdeg(δi) = ei for
all i = 1, . . . , l. Since A has a defining equation with only integer coeffi-
cients, we can assume that every polynomial that appear in each δ ∈ ∆ is
in Z[x1, . . . , xl]. Hence we can consider ¯δ1, . . . , ¯δl ∈ DerFl
the image of
δ1, . . . , δl. We can assume that p ∤ δ for all δ ∈ ∆, and hence ¯δ 6= 0 for all
δ ∈ ∆. This implies that pdeg(¯δi) = pdeg(δi) = ei for all i = 1, . . . , l.
p
By the definition of D(A), for each δ ∈ ∆ there exists h ∈ Z[x1, . . . , xl]
such that δ(Q(A)) = hQ(A). If we apply πp to this expression we obtain
that ¯δ(Q(Ap)) = πp(δ(Q(A))) = πp(hQ(A)) = πp(h)Q(Ap), and hence
¯δ ∈ D(Ap).
By Theorem 3.7, since in each δ ∈ ∆ every polynomial that appear have
only integer coefficients, there exists c ∈ Z \ {0} such that det(δi(xj))i,j =
cQ(A). If we apply πp to the previous equality we obtain that det(¯δi(xj))i,j =
πp(det(δi(xj))i,j) = πp(cQ(A)) = πp(c)Q(Ap). Hence if p does not divide
c, we have that πp(c) ∈ Fp \ {0} and hence again by Theorem 3.7, we
have that ¯δ1, . . . , ¯δl are a basis of D(Ap). This proves that Ap is free with
exponents (e1, . . . , el).
(cid:3)
FREE HYPERPLANE ARRANGEMENTS OVER ARBITRARY FIELDS
7
By Lemma 4.2, the number of non good primes is finite. Hence we have
the following.
Corollary 4.4. Let A be a central arrangement in Ql and p a large prime
number. If A is free in Ql with exponents (e1, . . . , el), then Ap is free in Fl
p
with exponents (e1, . . . , el).
From Example 3.3, we have the following.
Example 4.5. Consider the arrangement A of Example 3.3 with K = Q.
Then the determinant of the coefficient matrix of the basis of D(A) is equal
to 2Q(A). A direct computation shows that if we take another basis of D(A)
with only integer coefficients, then the determinant of the coefficient matrix
is equal to cQ(A) with c ∈ 2Z \ {0}. This is why over F2 the exponents of
A change.
Similarly to the previous example, we have the following
Example 4.6. Consider A the cone of A[−2,2] the Shi-Catalan arrangement
of type B as in Example 3.4 with K = Q. Then the determinant of the coef-
ficient matrix of any basis of D(A) with only integer coefficients is equal to
cQ(A), with c ∈ 35Z \ {0}. This is why over F5 and F7 the exponents of A
change.
Example 4.7 ([21]). Let Aall be the arrangement of all hyperplanes of F3
3
and L a line in F3
3. Consider the arrangement A = {H ∈ Aall H + L}
in F3
3. Now A is not free. However, if we consider K a field such that
char(K) 6= 3 and A′ an arrangement in K 3 satisfying L(A) ∼= L(A′), then
A′ is free with exponents (1, 4, 4). Notice that the corresponding matroid is
not representable over R or Q.
The following is an example of a free arrangements in Ql that is not free
in Fl
p, for some good prime p.
Example 4.8. Consider A the arrangement in Q4 as the cone of A[−2,2] the
Shi-Catalan arrangement of type B. As described in [2], A is free with ex-
ponents (1, 13, 15, 17). Moreover, the determinant of the coefficient matrix
of a basis of D(A) with only integer coefficients is equal to cQ(A), with
c ∈ 56595Z \ {0}. Notice that 56595 = 3 · 5 · 73 · 11. Now, 3 is not a good
prime but 5, 7 and 11 are. A direct computation shows that the arrangement
A5 over F5 is free with exponents (1, 5, 15, 25). However, both A7 over F7
and A11 over F11 are not free.
5. HOMOGENEOUS IDEALS IN Z[x1, . . . , xl]
In this section, we study ideals in Z[x1, . . . , xl], their Betti numbers and
their zero divisors. This will play an important role in Section 6.
8
ELISA PALEZZATO AND MICHELE TORIELLI
Definition 5.1. Given a sequence of numbers {ci,j}, we obtain a new se-
quence by a cancellation as follows. Fix a j, and choose i and i′ so that one
of the numbers is odd and the other is even. Then replace ci,j by ci,j −1, and
replace ci′,j by ci′,j −1. We have a consecutive cancellation when i′ = i+1.
The following result is a generalization of Proposition 5.2 from [8] and it
will play an important role in Theorem 6.1.
Proposition 5.2. Let I be a homogeneous ideal of R = Z[x1, . . . , xl] and
p a prime number that is a non-zero divisor in R/I. Then, the graded Betti
numbers of (R/I) ⊗Z Q can be obtained from the one of (R/I) ⊗Z Fp by a
sequence of consecutive cancellations.
Proof. Since p is a non-zero divisor in R/I, then (R/I) ⊗Z Z(p) is flat over
Z(p). Let F• be a minimal graded free R⊗ZZ(p)-resolution of (R/I)⊗ZZ(p).
Note that F• ⊗Z Z(p) is a free resolution of (R/I) ⊗Z Z(p) over R ⊗Z Z(p) =
Z(p)[x1, . . . , xl], and that the graded Betti numbers of F• and F• ⊗Z Z(p) are
the same. The flatness of (R/I) ⊗Z Z(p) over Z(p) ensures that the complex
F• ⊗Z Fp = F• ⊗Z Z(p) ⊗Z(p) Fp is a free resolution of (R/I) ⊗Z Fp =
(R/I) ⊗Z Z(p) ⊗Z(p) Fp over R ⊗Z Fp = Fp[x1, . . . , xl]. Now matrices giving
the maps in this complex are in (x1, . . . , xl), i.e., it is a minimal resolution.
This shows that the graded Betti number of F• coincides with the one of
(R/I) ⊗Z Fp.
Now, F• ⊗Z(p) Q is a graded free (R ⊗Z Q)-resolution of (R/I) ⊗Z Q.
Therefore we can write F•⊗Z(p) Q = G•⊕G′
•, where G• is a minimal graded
free (R ⊗Z Q)-resolution of (R/I) ⊗Z Q and G′
• is a graded trivial complex
of free (R ⊗Z Q)-modules [9, Theorem 20.2]. Therefore, the graded Betti
numbers of (R/I) ⊗Z Q can be obtained from the one of (R/I) ⊗Z Fp by a
sequence of consecutive cancellations.
(cid:3)
From the notion of consecutive cancellations, we directly obtain the rela-
tion between homological dimensions.
Corollary 5.3. Let I be a homogeneous ideal of R = Z[x1, . . . , xl] and p
a prime number that is a non-zero divisor in R/I. Then, the Betti numbers
of (R/I) ⊗Z Q are smaller or equal to the one of (R/I) ⊗Z Fp, and hence
hdim((R/I) ⊗Z Q) ≤ hdim((R/I) ⊗Z Fp).
In general, given I an ideal of R = Z[x1, . . . , xl], the number of zero di-
visor in R/I is infinite. However, if we restrict our attention to zero divisors
that are prime numbers, we have the following.
Proposition 5.4. Let I be an ideal of R = Z[x1, . . . , xl]. Then the number
of distinct prime numbers that are zero divisors in R/I is finite.
FREE HYPERPLANE ARRANGEMENTS OVER ARBITRARY FIELDS
9
Proof. By Theorem 14.4 of [9], there exists a ∈ Z\{0} such that (R/I)[a−1]
is a free Z[a−1]-module. This implies that the set of distinct prime numbers
that are zero divisors in R/I is included in the set of distinct prime numbers
that divide a, that is finite by the unique factorization theorem.
(cid:3)
Also if the number of prime numbers that are zero divisors in R/I is
finite, it might be difficult to compute them. The rest of this section is
dedicated to describe a method to compute them.
Consider I an ideal of R = Z[x1, . . . , xl] and σ a term ordering on R. As
for the case with polynomial rings over fields, we can study the theory of
Grobner basis for ideals of R. We refer to Chapter 4.5 of [4] for details.
Definition 5.5. Let I be an ideal of R = Z[x1, . . . , xl], σ a term ordering
on R and G = {g1, . . . , gt} a set of non-zero polynomials in I. Then we say
that G is a minimal strong σ-Grobner basis for I if the following conditions
hold true
(1) G forms a set of generators of I;
(2) for each f ∈ I, there exists i ∈ {1, . . . , t} such that LMσ(gi) divides
LMσ(f );
(3) if i 6= j, then LMσ(gi) does not divide LMσ(gj).
Remark 5.6 (c.f. [4], Lemma 4.5.8). A minimal strong σ-Grobner basis of
an ideal I of Z[x1, . . . , xl] is also a σ-Grobner basis of I.
Proposition 5.7 ([4], Exercise 4.5.9). Let I be a non-zero ideal of R =
Z[x1, . . . , xl] and σ a term ordering on R. Then there always exists a mini-
mal strong σ-Grobner basis of I
Notice that in general, a minimal strong σ-Grobner basis is not unique.
Consider the following example.
Example 5.8. Consider the ideal I = (x2 − y, 3y) in Z[x, y] and σ =
degrevlex. Then both {x2 − y, 3y} and {x2 + y, 3y} are minimal strong
σ-Grobner basis for I.
Lemma 5.9. Let I be an ideal of R = Z[x1, . . . , xl], and σ a term ordering
on R. Let G1 and G2 be two minimal strong σ-Grobner bases of I. Then
{LMσ(g) g ∈ G1} = {LMσ(g) g ∈ G2}. Consequently we have G1 =
G2 and {LCσ(g) g ∈ G1} = {LCσ(g) g ∈ G2}.
Proof. Assume that there exists t ∈ LMσ(G1) \ LMσ(G2). Now, t ∈
LMσ(I) and hence there exists f ∈ I such that t = LMσ(f ). Since G2
is a minimal strong σ-Grobner basis for I, there exists g ∈ G2 such that
LMσ(g) = t′ divides LMσ(f ) = t. With a similar argument, we see that
t′, and hence t, is a multiple of an element t′′ in LMσ(G1). The minimal-
ity of G1 implies that t′′ = t. Hence, t = t′ ∈ LMσ(G2), but this is a
contradiction. This shows that LMσ(G1) ⊆ LMσ(G2).
10
ELISA PALEZZATO AND MICHELE TORIELLI
With the same argument we can show that LMσ(G2) ⊆ LMσ(G2), and
(cid:3)
hence that LMσ(G1) = LMσ(G2).
Remark 5.10. The previous lemma implies that {LMσ(g) g ∈ G} gener-
ates the monomial ideal LMσ(I).
By Lemma 5.9, we can introduce the following Definition. See [12], for
more details.
Definition 5.11. Let I be an ideal of R = Z[x1, . . . , xl], and σ be a term
ordering on R. If a prime number p does not divide the leading coefficient
of any polynomial in a minimal strong σ-Grobner basis for I, then we will
call p σ-lucky for I.
Remark 5.12. Given I an ideal of R = Z[x1, . . . , xl] and σ be a term
ordering on R, since a minimal strong σ-Grobner basis is finite, then the
number of primes that are not σ-lucky for I is finite.
Notice that the list of σ-lucky primes for an ideal depends on the choice
of term ordering.
Example 5.13. Consider the ideal I = (3x − y) in Z[x, y]. Consider on
Z[x, y] a term ordering σ such that x >σ y. Then {3x − y} is a minimal
strong σ-Grobner basis of I, and hence every prime p 6= 3 is σ-lucky for I.
However, if we consider on Z[x, y] a term ordering τ such that y >τ x, then
{y − 3x} is a minimal strong τ -Grobner basis of I. Hence every prime p is
τ -lucky for I, also p = 3.
Notice that in general, we cannot determine the σ-lucky primes from the
coefficients that appear in a set of generators.
Example 5.14. Consider the ideal I = (2x + 3y, x − y) in Z[x, y] with
σ = degrevlex. In this case, {5y, x − y} is a minimal strong σ-Grobner
basis of I, and hence p = 5 is the only non σ-lucky prime of I.
We are now ready to describe the relation between lucky primes and
primes that are non-zero divisors.
Proposition 5.15. Let I be an ideal of R = Z[x1, . . . , xl] and σ a term
ordering on R. If p is a σ-lucky prime for I, then p is a non-zero divisor in
R/I.
Proof. Let G = {g1, . . . , gt} be a minimal strong σ-Grobner basis of I and
p a σ-lucky prime for I. Suppose that p is a zero divisor in R/I. This im-
plies that there exists f ∈ R \ I such that pf ∈ I. By definition of minimal
strong σ-Grobner basis, there exists i ∈ {1, . . . , t} such that LMσ(gi) di-
vides LMσ(pf ). We can now consider h1 = pf − LMσ(pf )
LMσ(gi) gi ∈ I. Since p
FREE HYPERPLANE ARRANGEMENTS OVER ARBITRARY FIELDS
11
σ-lucky, p LMσ(pf1)
LMσ(gj ) , and hence h1 = pf1, for some f1 ∈ R. We can now
repeat the process with pf1 ∈ I and obtain pf2 = pf1 − LMσ(pf1)
LMσ(gj ) gj ∈ I,
for some j. Since G is a σ-Grobner basis this process will end after a fi-
nite number of steps, i.e. we will obtain that there exists a k ≥ 1 such that
pfk ∈ I with pfk 6= 0 but pfk+1 = 0. Retrieving each step, we can write
i=1 aigi ∈ I,
(cid:3)
i=1 paigi, for some ai ∈ R. This implies that f = Pt
pf = Pt
but this is impossible by assumption.
Notice that in general the set of distinct prime numbers that are non-zero
divisors in R/I contains strictly the set of σ-lucky primes for I.
Example 5.16. Consider the ideal of Example 5.13 with the term order-
ing σ. Then p = 3 is a non-zero divisor in R/I, but it is not a σ-lucky
prime.
6. FROM CHARACTERISTIC p TO CHARACTERISTIC 0
As in Section 4, we will assume that A = {H1, . . . , Hn} is a central
arrangement in Ql and hence that αi ∈ Z[x1, . . . , xl] for all i = 1, . . . , n.
Moreover, we can also assume that there exists no prime number p that
divides any αi.
In the rest of the paper, we will denote by J(A)Z the ideal of Z[x1, . . . , xl]
generated by Q(A) and its partial derivatives.
Theorem 6.1. Let A = {H1, . . . , Hn} be a central arrangement in Ql.
Let p be a good prime number for A that does not divide n and that is a
non-zero divisor in Z[x1, . . . , xl]/J(A)Z. If Ap is free in Fl
p with exponents
(e1, . . . , el), then A is free in Ql with exponents (e1, . . . , el).
Proof. Denote S = Q[x1, . . . , xl], Sp = Fp[x1, . . . , xl] and R = Z[x1, . . . , xl].
Notice that Sp/J(Ap) ∼= (R/J(A)Z) ⊗Z Fp and S/J(A) ∼= (R/J(A)Z) ⊗Z
Q.
Clearly Sp/J(Ap) = 0 if and only if S/J(A) = 0
Assume now that Sp/J(Ap) 6= 0. By Theorem 3.8, Sp/J(Ap) is Cohen-
Macaulay of dimension l − 2.
By Auslander-Buchsbaum equality, we can write
depth(Sp/J(Ap))+hdim(Sp/J(Ap)) = l = depth(S/J(A))+hdim(S/J(A)).
By Corollary 5.3, hdim(Sp/J(Ap)) ≥ hdim(S/J(A)) and hence, by the
previous equality, depth(Sp/J(Ap)) ≤ depth(S/J(A)). Now Sp/J(Ap)
is Cohen-Macaulay, hence depth(Sp/J(Ap)) = dim(Sp/J(Ap)) = l − 2 =
dim(S/J(A)). This implies that depth(S/J(A)) ≥ l − 2 = dim(S/J(A)).
On the other hand, depth(S/J(A)) ≤ dim(S/J(A)) and hence we have
12
ELISA PALEZZATO AND MICHELE TORIELLI
that depth(S/J(A)) = dim(S/J(A)). This implies that S/J(A) is Cohen-
Macaulay of dimension l − 2, and so A is free in Ql.
This argument also shows that 2 = hdim(Sp/J(Ap)) = hdim(S/J(A)),
and hence, S/J(A) have the same Betti numbers of Sp/J(Ap). Since
the exponents of A can be computed uniquely from the Betti numbers of
S/J(A), this implies that A has exponents (e1, . . . , el).
(cid:3)
In Theorem 6.1, the assumption that the prime p is a non-zero divisor in
Z[x1, . . . , xl]/J(A)Z is fundamental. In fact we have the following.
Example 6.2. Consider the arrangement A ⊆ Q3 with defining equation
Q(A) = z(x + 2y − 4z)(y + 4z)(x + 3y − 6z). A is non free and both
2 and 3 are zero divisors in Z[x1, . . . , xl]/J(A)Z.
In fact, we have that
3(y2z2 + 2yz3 − 8z4) ∈ J(A)Z but y2z2 + 2yz3 − 8z4 /∈ J(A)Z, and
similarly 2(xyz2 + 4y2z2 + 4xz3 + 8yz3 − 32z4) ∈ J(A)Z but xyz2 +
4y2z2 + 4xz3 + 8yz3 − 32z4 /∈ J(A)Z. However, both A2 and A3 are free
with exponents (1, 1, 2).
By Proposition 5.4, the number of prime numbers that are zero divisors
in Z[x1, . . . , xl]/J(A)Z is finite. Hence, putting together Corollary 4.4 and
Theorem 6.1, we have the following.
Corollary 6.3. Let A be a central arrangement in Ql and p a large prime
number. Ap is free in Fl
p with exponents (e1, . . . , el) if and only if A is free
in Ql with exponents (e1, . . . , el).
7. APPLICATIONS
As in Sections 4 and 6, we will assume that A = {H1, . . . , Hn} is a
central arrangement in Ql and hence that αi ∈ Z[x1, . . . , xl] for all i =
1, . . . , n. Moreover, we can also assume that there exists no prime number
p that divides any αi.
From Theorems 3.11 and 6.1, we have the following.
Theorem 7.1. Let A = {H1, . . . , Hn} be a central arrangement in Ql. Let
p be a good prime number for A that does not divide n and that is a non-
zero divisor in Z[x1, . . . , xl]/J(A)Z. If χ(Ap, pl−2) = 0, then A is free with
exponents (1, p, . . . , pl−2, A − 1 − p − · · · − pl−2).
As noted in [5], if p is a large prime number, then A and Ap have iso-
morphic intersection lattices, and hence have the same characteristic poly-
nomial. This fact, together with the finiteness of good prime numbers that
are zero divisors in Z[x1, . . . , xl]/J(A)Z, gives us the following.
Corollary 7.2. Let A be a central arrangement in Ql and p a large prime
number. If χ(A, pl−2) = 0, then A is free with exponents (1, p, . . . , pl−2, A−
1 − p − · · · − pl−2).
FREE HYPERPLANE ARRANGEMENTS OVER ARBITRARY FIELDS
13
Acknowledgements. The authors would like to thank G. Caviglia, M. Kum-
mini, N. Nakashima and M. Yoshinaga for many helpful discussions.
REFERENCES
[1] T. Abe. Divisionally free arrangements of hyperplanes. Inventiones mathematicae,
204(1):317 -- 346, 2016.
[2] T. Abe and H. Terao. The freeness of Shi -- Catalan arrangements. European Journal
of Combinatorics, 32(8):1191 -- 1198, 2011.
[3] T. Abe and M. Yoshinaga. Free arrangements and coefficients of characteristic poly-
nomials. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 275(3-4):911 -- 919, 2013.
[4] W. W. Adams and P. Loustaunau. An introduction to Grobner bases. Number 3.
American Mathematical Soc., 1994.
[5] F. Ardila. Computing the tutte polynomial of a hyperplane arragement. Pacific Jour-
nal of Mathematics, 230(1):1 -- 26, 2007.
[6] A. Bigatti, E. Palezzato, and M. Torielli. New characterizations of freeness for hyper-
plane arrangements. arXiv:1801.09868, 2018.
[7] H. Crapo and G.-C. Rota. On the foundations of combinatorial theory: Combinatorial
geometries. MIT press Cambridge, Mass., 1970.
[8] K. Dalili and M. Kummini. Dependence of Betti numbers on characteristic. Commu-
nications in Algebra, 42(2):563 -- 570, 2014.
[9] D. Eisenbud. Commutative algebra with a view toward algebraic geometry, volume
150. Springer, 1995.
[10] P. Orlik and L. Solomon. Combinatorics and topology of complements of hyper-
planes. Inventiones mathematicae, 56(2):167 -- 189, 1980.
[11] P. Orlik and H. Terao. Arrangements of hyperplanes, volume 300 of Grundlehren
der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sci-
ences]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992.
[12] F. Pauer. On lucky ideals for Grobner basis computations. Journal of Symbolic Com-
putation, 14(5):471 -- 482, 1992.
[13] K. Saito. Theory of logarithmic differential forms and logarithmic vector fields. J.
Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. IA Math., 27(2):265 -- 291, 1980.
[14] H. Terao. Arrangements of hyperplanes and their freeness I. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo
Sect. IA Math., 27(2):293 -- 312, 1980.
[15] H. Terao. Generalized exponents of a free arrangement of hyperplanes and Shepherd-
Todd-Brieskorn formula. Inventiones mathematicae, 63(1):159 -- 179, 1981.
[16] H. Terao. Free arrangements of hyperplanes over an arbitrary field. Proceedings of
the Japan Academy, Series A, Mathematical Sciences, 59(7):301 -- 303, 1983.
[17] M. Yoshinaga. Characterization of a free arrangement and conjecture of Edelman and
Reiner. Inventiones mathematicae, 157(2):449 -- 454, 2004.
[18] M. Yoshinaga. On the freeness of 3-arrangements. Bulletin of the London Mathemat-
ical Society, 37(01):126 -- 134, 2005.
[19] M. Yoshinaga. Free arrangements over finite field. Proceedings of the Japan Acad-
emy, Series A, Mathematical Sciences, 82(10):179 -- 182, 2007.
[20] T. Zaslavsky. Facing up to Arrangements: Face-Count Formulas for Partitions of
Space by Hyperplanes, volume 154. Memoirs American Mathematical Society, 1975.
[21] G. M. Ziegler. Matroid representations and free arrangements. Transactions of the
American Mathematical Society, 320(2):525 -- 541, 1990.
14
ELISA PALEZZATO AND MICHELE TORIELLI
ELISA PALEZZATO, DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS, HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY,
KITA 10, NISHI 8, KITA-KU, SAPPORO 060-0810, JAPAN.
E-mail address: [email protected]
MICHELE TORIELLI, DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS, HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY,
KITA 10, NISHI 8, KITA-KU, SAPPORO 060-0810, JAPAN.
E-mail address: [email protected]
|
1904.13301 | 3 | 1904 | 2019-10-20T16:10:12 | Toric topology of the Grassmannian of planes in $\mathbb{C}^5$ and the del Pezzo surface of degree $5$ | [
"math.AG",
"math.AT",
"math.SG"
] | We determine the integral homology of the orbit space of a maximal compact torus action on the Grassmannian Gr(2,5). Our approach uses the well-known Geometric Invariant Theory of the maximal algebraic torus action on this Grassmannian. | math.AG | math |
TORIC TOPOLOGY OF THE GRASSMANNIAN OF PLANES IN
C5 AND THE DEL PEZZO SURFACE OF DEGREE 5
HENDRIK S USS
Abstract. We determine the integral homology of the orbit space of a maxi-
mal compact torus action on the Grassmannian Gr(2, C5). Our approach uses
the well-known Geometric Invariant Theory of the maximal algebraic torus
action on this Grassmannian.
1. Introduction
We consider the Grassmannian Gr(2, C5), parametrising planes in C5, together
with the Plucker embedding Gr(2, C5) ֒→ P(V2 C5). The action of the algebraic
torus (C∗)5 y C5 by diagonal matrices induces an action of the subtorus
TC = {(t1, . . . , t5) ∈ (C∗)5 t1 · · · t5 = 1}
on Gr(2, C5). Via the TC-action on C5 we also obtain a linearisation of this action
TC yV2 C5. We refer to this linearisation as the standard one. In this paper, we
are mainly interested in the induced action of the associated compact torus
T = {(s1, . . . , s5) ∈ (S1)5 s1 · · · s5 = 1}.
The orbit space Gr(2, C5)/T of this torus action is a compact Hausdorff space
and the purpose of this paper is to determine the integral homology groups of
this space and more generally to develop a framework which can be applied in
similar situations. The motivation for this problem comes from toric topology where
the topology of torus quotients of Grassmannians, flag manifolds and Hessenberg
varieties has been studied recently [BT16, BT19a, BT19b, Ayz18, Che19], see also
[KT18, Suss18]. Our main result is the following.
Theorem 1.1. The orbit space Gr(2, C5)/T has non-trivial homology groups
Hi(Gr(2, C5)/T ) ∼=(Z
i = 0, 8
Z/2Z i = 5.
Remark 1.2. The homology groups with coefficients in Z/2Z had been found before
by Buchstaber and Terzi´c in the earlier version [BT18] of their article [BT19b]. In
between, they also determined the correct integral homology groups independently.
The proof of Theorem 1.1 will take us on a tour from the classical birational
geometry of the del Pezzo surface of degree 5 to the more recent theme of Variation
of Geometric Invariant Theory which in turn, by the Kempf-Ness Theorem, links
to the topology of the orbits space of the compact torus action. More precisely, our
proof of Theorem 1.1 in Section 5 will make use of the Geometric Invariant Theory
(GIT) of the TC-action on Gr(2, C5). As it will be discussed in Section 4 this
Geometric Invariant Theory is known to be governed by the birational geometry
of the degree-5 del Pezzo surface. For this reason we first review the birational
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 57S25 (primary), 14L24, 53D20, 14J26 (secondary).
Key words and phrases. Grassmannian, torus action, orbit space, Geometric Invariant Theory,
del Pezzo surface.
1
2
H. S USS
geometry of this surface in Section 3. In this context the combinatorial structure
of a directed chamber decomposition arises naturally. Hence, we start off with
introducing this notion in Section 2 and deriving some of its basic properties.
Acknowledgement. This research was partially supported by the program In-
terdisciplinary Research conducted jointly by the Skolkovo Institute of Science and
Technology and the Interdisciplinary Scientific Center J.-V. Poncelet. In particular,
I would like to thank Center Poncelet for its great hospitality. This work was also
partially supported by the grant 346300 for IMPAN from the Simons Foundation
and the matching 2015-2019 Polish MNiSW fund.
I would like to thank Anton Ayzenberg, Victor Buchstaber, Alexander Perepechko,
Nige Ray and Svjetlana Terzi´c for stimulating discussions on the subject of this pa-
per. Moreover, I am grateful for the helpful comments by an anonymous referee.
2. Directed chamber decompositions
Consider a polyhedron P contained in a real vector space V . By a chamber
decomposition of P we understand a polyhedral subdivision induced by a finite set
of affine hyperplanes, i.e. the maximal elements (called chambers) of the polyhedral
subdivision are given as the closures of connected components of the complement
of the hyperplane arrangement.
Now, we equip each of the hyperplanes with a direction, i.e. we consider a finite
α }α∈A with A being some finite index set
collection of closed affine halfspaces {H +
and
H +
α = {v ∈ V hv, uαi ≥ bα} ⊂ V
for some uα ∈ V ∗ and bα ∈ R. Then H −
α = {v ∈ V hv, uαi ≤ bα} will denote
the opposite closed affine halfspace and Hα = H +
α the separating hyperplane.
Consider a subset J ⊂ A and denote its complement A \ J by J. Assume that the
corresponding intersection
α ∩ H −
PJ = P ∩ \α∈J
of positive and negative halfspaces gives a polyhedron of full dimension. These
polyhedra are simply the chambers of the chamber decomposition corresponding
to the arrangement of hyperplanes {Hα}α∈A. Moreover, the boundary of every
chamber comes with a distinguished part ∂
we will call the positive boundary of PJ . In this situation, we speak of a directed
chamber decomposition consisting of the directed chambers (PJ , ∂
α! ∩\α∈J
PJ := PJ ∩(cid:0)∂P ∪Sα∈J Hα(cid:1) , which
α
H −
+
PJ ).
H +
+
If the common intersection of all positive halfspaces
H +
α
P + := PA = P ∩ \α∈A
has non-empty interior we call it the central chamber of the directed chamber
decomposition. Note, that by definition we have ∂P + = ∂+P +.
Lemma 2.1. Consider two chambers PI , PJ with J 6⊂ I then PI ∩ PJ is contained
in ∂
+
PJ .
Proof. By our precondition J \ I is not empty. Consider an α ∈ J \ I. Then PI ∩ PJ
must be contained in both H +
α and H −
α . Hence, it is a subset of Hα. By definition
this implies that PI ∩ PJ is a subset of ∂
(cid:3)
PJ .
+
Lemma 2.2. Consider a directed chamber decomposition admitting a central cham-
ber. Then for every other compact chamber PJ the positive boundary ∂
PJ is a
deformation retract of PJ .
+
TORIC TOPOLOGY OF THE GRASSMANNIAN OF PLANES IN C5
3
Proof. Note, that P is itself an intersection of halfspaces. By adding them to the
set of positive halfspaces we may assume, that P = V , since the chambers of
the original decomposition of P are now a subset of the chambers of the induced
decomposition of V . Moreover, without loss of generality we may assume that 0 is
α , since by our precondition an interior
point exists and we may apply a global translation moving this point into the origin.
In the notation above this means that all the bα are negative.
an interior point of the intersectionTα∈A H +
We now consider v ∈ PJ . The intersection of PJ with the line Rv has to be
compact and convex. Hence, we obtain a line segment L(v). Then there is a
unique intersection point r(v) := L(v) ∩ ∂+PJ . Indeed, we may assume L(v) = uw,
u ≥ w. Then u ∈ ∂P +
J . Indeed, it is clearly a boundary point. Let Hα1 , . . . , Hαk
be its supporting hyperplanes i.e. huαj , ui = bαj < 0. Then we have
huαj , tui = thuαj , ui < bαj
j=1 H −
j ∈ {1, . . . , k}.
αj . This implies that αj ∈ J for at least one
If not, we would have tu ∈ PJ for t sufficiently close to 1. A
α , i.e.
huα, ui ≥ bα < 0 for all α ∈ J, but this implies huα, sui > bα for s < 1 and
PJ = u. Now H(t, v) = (1 − t) · v +
(cid:3)
for t > 1. Hence, tu ∈ Tk
contradiction to our choice of u. On the other hand, we have u ∈ Tα∈J H +
consequently su 6∈Sα∈J Hα. Hence, L(v) ∩ ∂
t · r(v) defines a deformation retraction of PJ to ∂
+
+
PJ .
3. The birational geometry of the del Pezzo surface of degree 5
In this section we review basic facts on the birational geometry of the del Pezzo
surface Y = dP5 of degree 5, most of them can be found in [Dol12, Chapter 8].
The del Pezzo surface Y can be constructed as the blowup of CP2 in 4 points in
general position. Hence, the Picard group Pic(Y ) is a free abelian group of rank 5
with basis [E1], . . . , [E5], where E5 is the preimage of a line in CP2 not containing
the points of the blowup and E1, . . . , E4 are the exceptional divisors of the blowups.
i=1[Ei]. The
intersection product of curves defines a non-degenerate bilinear form on Pic(Y ),
where
The class of the canonical divisor is given by [KY ] = −3[E5] +P4
[Ei] · [Ej] =
1
i = j = 5
−1 i = j ≤ 4
0
i 6= j.
The cone of effective divisors Eff(Y ) ⊂ N 1 := Pic(Y ) ⊗ R is spanned by the classes
of ten irreducible rational curves (i.e. they are isomorphic to CP1), which we are
going to be indexed by two-element subsets {i, j} ⊂ {1, . . . , 5}. Their classes can
be expressed in the basis from above as follows.
[Ci5] = [Ei], i ∈ {1, . . . , 4}
[Cij ] = [E5] − [Ei] − [Ej], {i, j} ⊂ {1, . . . , 4}
These curves are characterised by the properties [Cij ]2 = −1 and [KY ] · [Cij ] = −1.
They are usually referred to as (−1)-curves or exceptional curves. Note, that by
the above two such curves Cij and Ckℓ intersect if and only if {i, j} ∩ {k, ℓ} = ∅.
Hence, the intersection graph of these ten curves is the well-known Petersen graph
shown in Figure 1.
We also consider the polytope P obtained as the cross section
P = Eff(Y ) ∩ {v [KY ] · v = −1} ⊂ N 1.
Since Eff(Y ) is spanned by the classes [Cij ] which fulfil [Cij] · [KY ] = −1, it follows
that P coincides with the convex hull of these classes in N 1 and the faces of Eff(Y )
4
H. S USS
Figure 1. Intersection graph for the ten exceptional curves
with the exception of the vertex are in one-to-one correspondence with the faces
of P . Note, that expressing the classes [Cij ] in a new basis b1, . . . , b5 of N 1 given
by bi = 1
2 [E5] − [Ei], we obtain [Cij ] = bi + bj. Hence, P coincides with the
hypersimplex ∆2,5. Furthermore, one observes that the facets of P come in pairs
Oi and Ti, i = 1, . . . , 5, where Ti is the tetrahedron obtained as the convex hull
of the classes [Cij ] with j ∈ {1, . . . , 5} \ {i} and Oi is the octahedron obtained as
the convex hull of the remaining 6 exceptional classes. Recalling the fact that two
exceptional curves intersect if and only if their index sets are disjoint we see that
the tetrahedral facets are given exactly by all possible choices of 4 pairwise disjoint
curves among the 10 exceptional ones.
Now, for every rational divisor class [D] ∈ Eff(Y ) one obtains a projective variety
Y[D] = ProjMk≥0
H 0(Y, O(kD)) .
∼= Y[D] for every k ≥ 0. Hence, we may assume that [D] ∈ P .
Here, we have Y[kD]
The construction comes with a contraction map φ[D] : Y 99K Y[D]. In the case of a
surface this rational map extends to a morphism. If we choose [D] from the interior
of P the corresponding map φ[D] is birational inducing an isomorphism between
the complement of the exceptional curves and its image. Moreover, an exceptional
curve Cij is contracted to a point under this map if and only if we have [D]·[Cij ] ≤ 0
for the intersection product. Hence, for every exceptional curve Cij we may define
two closed halfspaces and its boundary hyperplane
H ±
ij := {[D] ±[D] · [Cij ] ≥ 0}, Hij := {[D] [D] · [Cij ] = 0}
In this way we obtain a directed chamber decomposition of P , where the index
set A for the hyperplanes consists of all exceptional curves (or equivalently of all
2-element subsets of {1, . . . , 5}).
Remark 3.1. For [D] ∈ PJ \ ∂
curves in J = A \ J.
+
PJ the map φ[D] is given as the contraction of the
For some choices of J ⊂ A the intersection PJ has lower dimension, i.e. PJ does
not constitute a chamber. The chambers among the PJ correspond exactly to the
choice J ⊂ A such that J consists of pairwise disjoint exceptional curves. It is not
hard to see from the intersection graph that one can choose at most 4 such curves.
The corresponding birational models Y[D] are obtained from Y by blowing down
up to 4 curves. In this way we obtian the blowups of CP2 in up to 4 points and
additionally CP1 × CP1. Note, that there is a central chamber P + ⊂ P spanning
the nef cone Nef(Y ) ⊂ N 1. Now, consider a point [D] ∈ ∂P . Then φ[D] : Y → CP1
defines a conic bundle structure on Y with three reducible fibres consisting of two
intersecting exceptional curves each if [D] lies in the interior of one of the facets Ok.
Here, these six exceptional curves are exactly the ones corresponding to the vertices
of Ok. All other exceptional curves are mapped isomorphically onto CP1. Finally,
if [D] does not lie in the interior of one of the octahedral facets, then φ[D] : Y → ∗
is the contraction to a point.
TORIC TOPOLOGY OF THE GRASSMANNIAN OF PLANES IN C5
5
4. The Geometric Invariant Theory of Gr(2, C5)
In this section we use standard results from the variation of GIT quotients. We
refer to [GM87, Hu92, DH98] for details.
The standard linearisation of the torus action on Gr(2, C5) defines a moment
map on Gr(2, C5) as follows.
µ : Gr(2, C5) → MR := R5/R · (1, 1, 1, 1, 1) ∼= R4;
(zij) 7→ Pij zij 2(ei + ej)
Pij zij 2
+ R · (1, 1, 1, 1, 1).
It is easy to see that this map is invariant under the compact torus action. Hence,
we obtain an induced map µ : Gr(2, C5)/T → MR and a fibre of this map can
be naturally identified with the quotient µ−1(u)/T . On the other hand, the fibre
quotients µ−1(u)/T are known to be homeomorphic to quotients of Gr(2, C5) by
the TC-action in the sense of GIT. In particular, these fibres are homeomorphic to
algebraic varieties. The fibre µ−1(0) equals the GIT quotient corresponding to the
standard linearisation.
The GIT quotients Yu := µ−1(u) = µ−1(u)/T are known to vary in a rather
well-behaved manner. Namely, there is a polyhedral subdivision Λ of the moment
polytope P , such that µ−1(u) ∼= µ−1(u′) whenever there is an element λ ∈ Λ such
that u and u′ belong to the relative interior λ◦ of λ, see e.g.
[GM87, 3]. Hence,
we may define Yλ := Yu for any u in the relative interior of λ. The map µ induces
a trivial fibration over the relative interior of each λ ∈ Λ, i.e. µ−1(λ◦) ∼= λ◦ × Yλ.
Moreover, for every pair of faces λ′ ≺ λ there is an induced contraction morphism
fλλ′ : Yλ → Yλ′ . Hence, we obtain an inverse system of GIT quotients indexed by
the elements of the polyhedral subdivision Λ.
The GIT quotient for the standard linearisation of the TC-action on Gr(2, C5) is
known to be Y = dP5, the del Pezzo surfaces of degree 5. This is shown in [Sko93,
Prop. 3.2]. The proof there also shows that the complement of the semi-stable locus
has codimension 2. Moreover, the stable and semi-stable locus coincide by Corollary
2.5 loc.cit. Now, by Theorem 2.3, Remark 2.3.1 and Corollary 2.4 of [HK00] we
conclude, that birational geometry of the del Pezzo surface Y and the Geometric
Invariant Theory of the Grassmannian Gr(2, C5) coincide in the following sense.
There is an isomorphism of vector spaces Ψ : MR × R → N 1(Y ) identifying the
cone over P × {1} with Eff(Y ), such that
(1) the polyhedral subdivision Λ gets identified with the chamber decomposi-
tion from Section 3.
(2) for a fixed λ ∈ Λ and any two rational elements u, u′ ∈ λ◦ in its rel-
ative interior the corresponding contractions φΨ(u,1) : Y → YΨ(u,1) and
φΨ(u′,1) : Y → YΨ(u′,1) coincide,
(3) for λ ∈ Λ and u ∈ λ◦ the GIT quotient Yλ coincides with the birational
model YΨ(u,1). Hence, we obtain well-defined morphisms φλ : Y → Yλ by
setting φλ = φΨ(u,1).
(4) Moreover, the contraction morphisms φλ are compatible with the inverse
system of GIT quotients, i.e. for λ′ ≺ λ we have φλ′ = fλλ′ ◦ φλ.
Goresky and MacPherson showed in [GM87, 5] that the orbit space X/T of a
projective variety X ⊂ CPN with moment polytope P can be recovered from the
corresponding inverse system of GIT quotient as the identification space
X/T ∼= Gλ∈Λ
λ × Yλ! /∼,
6
H. S USS
where (u, y) ∼ (u, y′) if (u, y′) ∈ λ′ × Yλ′, (u, y) ∈ λ × Yλ with λ′ ≺ λ and fλλ′ (y) =
y′.
In our setting, where Y dominates all GIT quotients of Gr(2, C5) via the mor-
phisms φλ : Y → Yλ, this construction can be simplified as follows. Let us define
an equivalence relation φ∼ on P × Y by
(u, y) φ∼ (u, y′) ⇔ φλ(y) = φλ(y′)
for the unique λ ∈ Λ with u ∈ λ◦. Then by [Suss18, Corollary 2.2] we have
(1)
Gr(2, C5)/T ∼= (P × Y )/ φ∼.
For the remaining part of this paper we will utilise this homeomorphism to study
the topology of Gr(2, C5)/T .
From now one we will identify P with its image Ψ(P × {1}) and the polyhedral
subdivision Λ with the one induced by the directed chamber decomposition of
Section 3.
In the following Proposition we merely reformulate the observations
from Section 3 in terms of GIT and the map µ : Gr(2, C5)/T → P .
Proposition 4.1. For an element λ ∈ Λ of maximal dimension we have a homeo-
λ) × Yλ, where Yλ is either CP1 × CP1 or a blowup
morphism µ−1(λ \ ∂
of CP2 in up to 4 points.
λ) ∼= (λ \ ∂
+
+
Morover, for the facets Oi ≺ P we have µ−1(O◦
type of facets Ti ≺ P we have µ−1(Ti) ∼= Ti.
i ) ∼= O◦
i × CP1. For the second
5. The homology groups for Gr(2, C5)/T
We consider the chamber decomposition Λ of the hypersimplex P = ∆2,5 from
Section 3, which parametrises the contractions Y[D] of Y = dP5.
In Section 4
we have seen that that these contractions coincide with the fibres Yu = µ−1(u).
For i = 1, . . . , 5 let Λk the set of chambers λ ∈ Λ such that for u ∈ λ◦ the
morphism Y → Yu contracts exactly 5 − k of the 10 exceptional curves. In the
notation of Section 3 this is Λk = {PJ #J = 5 − k}. Let Λk denote the support
λ. By Lemma 2.1 for a chamber λ ∈ Λk+1 we have
of Λk, i.e.
Λk := Sλ∈Λk
+
i=1 Λi = ∂
λ ∩Sk
λ. Now, for k = 1, . . . , 5 we set
Vk = µ−1 k[i=0
Λi!
and V0 = µ−1(∂P ).
In this way we obtain a filtration of Gr(2, C5)/T by closed
subspaces. Our strategy to determine the homology groups of V5 = Gr(2, C5)/T is
as follows.
(1) In Proposition 5.2 we show that the relative homology groups of the pairs
(V5, V4) and (V5, V0) coincide.
(2) In Lemma 5.3 we calculate the relative homology groups of the pair (V5, V4).
(3) In Lemma 5.4 we calculate the homology groups of V0.
(4) We consider the long exact sequence of homology for the pair (V5, V0). The
results from steps (1)-(3) allow us to calculate most of the homology groups
of V5.
(5) To determine the remaining homology groups we have to study some of
the homomorphisms in the long exact sequence in detail. This is done in
Lemma 5.5 and Proposition 5.9.
TORIC TOPOLOGY OF THE GRASSMANNIAN OF PLANES IN C5
Lemma 5.1. For every full dimensional λ ∈ Λ the quotient space µ−1(λ)/µ−1(∂
is contractible.
Proof. First note, that µ−1(λ)/µ−1(∂
tion 4.1. Now Lemma 2.2 says that ∂
H : [0, 1] × λ → λ be the deformation retraction. Then
+
λ) ∼= (λ × Yλ) /(cid:16)∂
+
+
λ × Yλ(cid:17) by Proposi-
λ ⊂ λ is a deformation retract of λ. Let
7
+
λ)
H ×id : ([0, 1] × λ) × Yλ → λ × Yλ
is a deformation retraction of λ × Yλ onto ∂
H×id with the quotient map (λ × Yλ) → (λ × Yλ) /(cid:16)∂
λ × Yλ(cid:17) onto the point(cid:16)∂
retraction of (λ × Yλ) /(cid:16)∂
+
+
+
λ × Yλ(cid:17) gives a deformation
λ × Yλ(cid:17). (cid:3)
λ × Yλ(cid:17) /(cid:16)∂
+
+
λ × Yλ and finally the composition of
Proposition 5.2. The identity on V5 induces an isomorphism of relative homology
groups Hi(V5, V4) ∼= Hi(V5, V0).
Proof. We show that Hi(V5, V4) ∼= Hi(V5, V5−k) by induction on k = 1, . . . , 5. As-
sume we know that Hi(V5, V4) ∼= Hi(V5, V5−k) then we consider the pair V5−k−1 ⊂
V5−k for its relative homology we have Hi(V5−k−1, V5−k) ∼= eHi(V5−k−1/V5−k), but
µ−1(λ)/µ−1(∂
then
λ),
+
Vk+1/Vk ∼= _λ∈Λk+1
is contractible by Lemma 5.1. Hence, we obtain Hi(V5−k−1, V5−k) = 0. Now, the
long exact sequence for the triple V5−k−1 ⊂ V5−k ⊂ V5 implies that Hi(V5, V5−k−1) ∼=
Hi(V5, V5−k) and we obtain Hi(V5, V5−k−1) ∼= Hi(V5, V4) by induction hypothe-
sis.
(cid:3)
Note, that by definition V4 coincides with the complement of µ−1((P +)◦) in
V5 = Gr(2, C5)/T . Hence, we have V5/V4 ∼= (P + × Y )/(∂P + × Y ).
Lemma 5.3. The homology groups of V5/V4 are given by
Hi(V5/V4) ∼=
Z
Z5
0
i = 4, 8, 0
i = 6,
else
Moreover, H6(V5/V4) is generated by the images of the homomorphisms
(id × ιij )∗ : H6((P + × Cij )/(∂P + × Cij )) → H6(V5/V4),
where 1 ≤ i < j ≤ 5 and ιij : Cij ֒→ Y denotes the inclusion of the (−1)-curve Cij .
Proof. The non-trivial homology groups for Y , the blowup of CP2 in four points,
are known to be
Hi(Y ) ∼=(Z
Z5
i = 0, 4
i = 2.
Moreover, the homology group H2(Y ) ∼= Pic(Y ) is generated by the fundamental
classes of the (−1)-curves Cij .
Applying the Kunneth theorem to products of pairs (P +, ∂P +) × (Cij , ∅) and
(P +, ∂P +) × (Y, ∅), respectively we obtain the following commutative diagram
(2) Lr+s=m Hr(P +, ∂P +) ⊗ Hs(Cij , ∅)
Lr+s=m Hr(P +, ∂P +) ⊗ Hs(Y, ∅)
id∗ ⊗ ιij
∗
∼
∼
Hm(P + × Cij, ∂P + × Cij )
(id × ιij )∗
Hm(P + × Y, ∂P + × Y )
8
H. S USS
Here, the horizontal isomorphisms are just the relative Kunneth isomorphisms
and the commutativity of the diagram just corresponds to the naturality of these
isomorphisms. From the lower row of this diagram we directly conclude
Moreover, the only nontrivial summands in
eHi(V5/V4) ∼= Hi(P + × Y, ∂P + × Y ) ∼=
H6(P + × Y, ∂P + × Y ) ∼= Mr+s=6
H6(P + × Cij , ∂P + × Y ) ∼= Mr+s=6
and
Z
Z5
0
i = 4, 8
i = 6
else.
Hr(P +, ∂P +) ⊗ Hs(Y, ∅)
Hr(P +, ∂P +) ⊗ Hs(Cij , ∅)
are H4(P +, ∂P +) ⊗ H2(Y, ∅) and H4(P +, ∂P +) ⊗ H2(Cij , ∅), respectively. Since
H2(Y ) is generated by the images of the homomorphisms
ιij
∗ : H2(Cij ) → H2(Y )
it follows by (2) that H6(P + × Y, ∂P + × Y ) is generated by the images of the
homomorphisms
(id × ιij)∗ : H6(P + × Cij , ∂P + × Cij ) → H6(P + × Y, ∂P + × Y ).
Composing again with the map of pairs
(P + × Y, ∂P + × Y ) → ((P + × Y )/(∂P + × Y ), ∗) ∼= (V5/V4, ∗)
implies our claim.
(cid:3)
Lemma 5.3 in combination with Proposition 5.2 provides us with the relative
homology groups of the pair (V5, V0). Our next aims are to calculate the homology
groups of V0 and then use the long exact sequence of the pair (V5, V0) to eventually
determine the homology groups of V5 = Gr(2, C5)/T .
To study the homology groups of V0 we follow the approach of [BT19b, 12.1]
and consider a section s : P → Gr(2, C5)/T of µ. Such a section can be constructed
as follows. Fix an element y ∈ Y and set s(u) = [(u, y)] ∈ (P × Y )/ φ∼. Recall from
Proposition 4.1 that µ−1(O◦
i . Then
µ−1(O◦
i × (S2 \ {∗}) as a product of open balls is itself homeomorphic
to an open ball and its one-point compactification is a 5-sphere, which we denote
by S5
i × S2 and µ−1(u) = {s(u)} for u 6∈Si O◦
i . On the other hand, we have
i ) \ s(∂P ) ∼= O◦
i ) ∼= O◦
V0 ∼= s(∂P ) ∪
5ai=1(cid:0)µ−1(O◦
i ) \ s(∂P )(cid:1) .
Note, that V0 as a closed subset of a compact space is itself compact. Hence,
V0/s(∂P ) is compact as well. It follows that V0/s(∂P ) is the one-point compactifi-
i=1 S5
i .
Lemma 5.4 ([BT19b, Lem. 29]). The non-trivial homology groups of V0 are the
following
i ) \ s(∂P )(cid:1), which by the above is homeomorphicW5
cation of`5
i=1(cid:0)µ−1(O◦
Hi(V0, Z) =(Z
Z5
i = 0, 3
i = 5.
Moreover, the homomorphism H3(∂P ) → H3(V0) and H5(V0) → H5(cid:0)Wi S5
duced by the section s and the quotient map V0 → V0/s(∂P ), respectively, are
isomorphisms.
i(cid:1), in-
TORIC TOPOLOGY OF THE GRASSMANNIAN OF PLANES IN C5
9
Proof. This follows directly from the considerations above, the fact that ∂P is
homeomorphic to S3 and the long exact sequence for the pair (V0, s(∂P )).
(cid:3)
Proof of Theorem 1.1. The exact homology sequence for the pair V0 ⊂ V5 together
with Proposition 5.2 and Lemma 5.3 implies Hi(V5) = 0 for i = 1, 2, 7, 8. Moreover,
we obtain the exact sequences
(3)
and
(4)
0 → H4(V5) −→ Z −→ Z
ι∗−→ H3(V5) → 0.
0 → H6(V5) −→ Z5 ∂6−→ Z5 −→ H5(V5) → 0
Now by Lemma 5.5, below, the inclusion ι : V0 ֒→ V5 induces the trivial homomor-
phism H3(V0) → H3(V5).
It follows from the exactness of (3) that H3(V5) = 0
and that the central homomorphisms in (3) is an isomorphism and eventually that
H4(V5) = 0.
We will show later in Proposition 5.9 that the co-kernel of the connecting ho-
momorphism ∂6 : H6(V5, V0) → H5(V0) is Z/2Z. Then the exactness of (4) implies
H5(V5) ∼= Z/2Z and H6(V5) = 0.
(cid:3)
Lemma 5.5. Let ι : V0 → V5 = Gr(2, C5)/T denote the inclusion map. Then the
induced map ι∗ : H3(V0) → H3(V5) is trivial.
Proof. Consider the section s : P → V5 of µ from above. Then by Lemma 5.4 the
induced homomorphism (s∂P )∗ : H3(∂P ) → H3(V0) is an isomorphism. On the
other hand, we have the following commutative diagram.
V0
s
∂P
ι
V5
s
P
It follows that ι∗ : H3(V0) → H3(V5) must be trivial, as H3(P ) = 0.
(cid:3)
In the following for a product Q×Z and F ⊂ Q we define an equivalence relation
as follows. For u ∈ F we have (u, z) F∼ (u, z′) for all z ∈ Z. With this notation we
have the following technical lemma
Lemma 5.6. Let H + = Rk−1 × R≥0 be a closed halfspace with boundary hyperplane
H = Rk−1 × {0}. Consider D+ = Dk ∩ H +, S+ = Sk−1 and Dk−1 = Dk ∩ H. Then
there exists a homeomorphism (D+ × Sm)/ S+
∼ ∼= Dk+m identifying (Dk−1 × Sm)/ S+
∼
with the boundary sphere Sk+m−1.
Proof. The map
(D+ × Sm)/S+
∼ → Dk+m,
defines a homeomorphisms identifying (Dk−1 × Sm)/S+
∼ with the boundary sphere.
Here, for u ∈ Rk−1 × R we denote by u1 and u2 the projection to the first and
second factor, respectively.
(cid:3)
[(u, y)] 7→ (u1,p1 − u2 · y)
For every exceptional curve Cij ∼= CP1 ∼= S2 we consider the polytopes Pij =
ij ∩ P and its facet Fij = P ∩ Hij . Then the curve Cij does not get contracted
ij , but it gets contracted under this map if
i or
H +
under the map Y → Yu for u ∈ P ◦
u ∈ H −
u ∈ O◦
ij ∩ P . If u ∈ ∂P then Cij gets not contracted if and only if u ∈ O◦
j . Now, the inclusion Pij × Cij ⊂ P × Y induces an embedding
eCij := (Pij × Cij)/ φ∼ ֒−→ (P × Y )/ φ∼ ∼= Gr(2, C5)/T.
10
H. S USS
The pair (Pij , Fij ) is homeomorphic to the pair (D+, S+) in Lemma 5.6. Hence,
Fij∼ is homeomorphic to the
by that Lemma we conclude that D6
closed disc D6, where the boundary S5 ⊂ D6 is being identified with the sphere
Fij∼ . Recall that Cij gets contracted under the map
S5
Y → Yu for u ∈ Hij, i.e. for u ∈ Hij we have (u, y) φ∼ (u, y′) for every two points
y, y′ ∈ Cij . Hence, we obtain a map Ψij : D6
ij := ((Pij ∩ ∂P ) × Cij )/
ij → V5 via the composition
ij := (Pij × Cij )/
(Pij × Cij )/
Fij∼
→ (Pij × Cij )/ φ∼
֒→ V5
=D6
ij
{z
}
= eCij
{z
}
ij ⊂ D6
and S5
(D6
ij, S5
ij ) → (V5, V0) for 1 ≤ i < j ≤ 5. These maps induce homomorphisms be-
tween the corresponding long exact sequences fitting into the following commutative
diagram.
ij is sent to eCij ∩ V0 via this map. Hence the Ψij are maps of pairs
(5)
H6(S5
ij )
H6(D6
ij )
H6(D6
ij, S5
ij )
∼=
H5(S5
ij )
Ψij
∗
Ψij
∗
Ψij
∗
Ψij
∗
H6(V0)
H6(V5)
H6(V5, V0)
H5(V0)
Lemma 5.7. Consider a continuous map of pairs q : (X, ∂X) → (Y /∂Y, ∗). Where
X and Y are compact orientable n-dimensional manifold with boundary. Assume
that there exist an open subset U ⊂ X \ ∂X which is mapped homeomorphically
onto some open subset V ⊂ Y /∂Y .
Then q induces an isomorphism
q∗ : Hn(X, ∂X) ∼−→ eHn(Y /∂Y ).
Proof. We set Z = Y /∂Y and pick a point y ∈ Y ◦ := Y \ ∂Y , which we identify
with its image in Z. We than have Hn(Z, Z \ y) ∼= eHn(Z). Indeed consider the
following diagram
Hn(Y, ∂Y )
∼
Hn(Y, Y \ y)
∼
Hn(Y ◦, Y ◦ \ y)
∼
∼
Hn(Z, Z \ y)
∼
Hn(Y ◦, Y ◦ \ y)
Both sides of the diagram commute as the homomorphisms are induced by in-
clusions of pairs and the quotient map. The horizontal arrows on the right are
isomorphisms by excision. By commutativity of the right square the central ver-
tical arrow has to be an isomorphism and the commutativity of the left square
implies that the lower left horizontal arrow is an isomorphism as well.
We argue similarly as before. For every x ∈ U ∩ φ−1(Y ◦) we get essentially the
same diagram as above
Hn(X, ∂X)
∼
Hn(X, X \ x)
q∗
q∗
∼
Hn(Z, Z \ q(x))
∼
∼
Hn(U, U \ x)
∼ q∗
Hn(V, V \ q(x))
eHn(Z)
eHn(Z)
with both squares commuting. This time we know that the horizontal arrow in the
lower left is an isomorphism due to the above considerations. Arguing as before
shows that the left vertical arrow is an isomorphism.
(cid:3)
TORIC TOPOLOGY OF THE GRASSMANNIAN OF PLANES IN C5
11
Lemma 5.8. The classes Ψij
∗ [D6
ij, S5
ij ] generate the relative homology group H6(V5, V0).
Fij∼ . By the definition of P + we have P + ⊂ Pij
Proof. Recall, that D6
and Hij ∩ P + ⊂ ∂P +. Hence, (P + × Cij)/(∂P + × Cij ) can be identified with the
quotient of D6
ij by the complement of (P +)◦ × Cij and we obtain a map of pairs
ij = Pij × Cij /
ij) → ((P + × Cij )/(∂P + × Cij ), ∗).
Moreover, this map fits into the following commutative diagram
φ : (D6
ij, S5
(D6
ij , S5
ij)
Ψij
φ
((P + × Cij )/(∂P + × Cij ), ∗)
id × ιij
(V5, V0)
(V5, V4)
(V5/V4, ∗) ∼= ((P + × Y )/(∂P + × Y ), ∗)
By Proposition 5.2 we see that in the induced diagram on the level of homology
In the top row we have at least an
we have isomorphisms in the bottom row.
isomorphism for H6 by Lemma 5.7 as (P +)◦ × Cij ⊂ D6
ij is an open subset which
gets mapped homeomorphically onto it image in (P + × Cij )/(∂P + × Cij ).
By Lemma 5.3 we know that eH6(V5/V4) is generated by images of the homology
groups eH6((P + × Cij)/(∂P + × Cij)). By the commutativity of the diagram we see
that the images of the groups H6(D6
ij) have to generate H6(V5, V0).
Proposition 5.9. The connecting homomorphism ∂6 of the long exact sequence
ij , S5
(cid:3)
. . . → H6(V0) → H6(V5) → H6(V5, V0)
∂6−→ H5(V0) → . . .
has cokernel Z/2Z .
Proof. Recall how the map ∂6 is constructed. A relative cycle of the pair (V5, V0) is
just mapped to its boundary, which by definition lies in V0. In our case we consider
the cycles Ψij
ij]. The image under the connecting homomorphism of such a
relative cycle is just given by Ψij
ij ] ∈ H5(V0). By Lemma 5.4 we have
ij , S5
∗ [D6
∗ [S5
H5(V0) ∼= H5(V0/s(∂P )) ∼= H5 5_ℓ=1
ℓ! ∼=
S5
5Mℓ=1
H5(S5
ℓ ) ∼= Z5.
A choice of an orientation for ∂P and S2 induces an orientation for each of the S5
ℓ
and by the above this fixes a basis for H5(V0). More precisely, we first obtain an
orientation on ∂P × S2. Now, recall that S5
ℓ was the one-point compactification of
ℓ × (S2 \ {∗}). Hence, the latter can be regarded as an open subset of both S5
O◦
ℓ
and ∂P × S2. We obtain an induced orientation via Lemma 5.7.
Now, we consider the degree of the composition
(6)
ij → V0 → V0/s(∂P ) → S5
S5
ℓ .
ij was obtained as ((H +
Fij∼ and that Cij was contracted
Recall that S5
to a point y ∈ Yu ∼= CP1 by Y → Yu for u ∈ Oℓ and ℓ 6= i, j. It follows that the
map in (6) is not surjective in this case and, hence, has degree 0. For ℓ = i or ℓ = j
Lemma 5.7 shows that the map has degree 1. Indeed, identifying Cij with S2 we
see that O◦
ℓ × (S2 \ {∗}) is mapped homeomorphically onto its image in S5
ℓ .
ij ∩ ∂P ) × Cij )/
By Lemma 5.8 the classes Ψij
∗ [D6
ij, S5
∂6 in H5(V0) is generated by the sums [S5
But this is the kernel of the surjective map
[S5
H5(V0) → Z/2Z;
j ] ∈L5
i ] 7→ 1 ∀i∈{1,...,5}.
ij] generate H6(V5, V0). Hence, the image of
ℓ ) with 1 ≤ i, j ≤ 5.
ℓ=1 H5(S5
i ] + [S5
(cid:3)
12
H. S USS
References
[Ayz18] Anton A. Ayzenberg. Torus actions of complexity 1 and their local properties. Proceedings
of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics, 302(1):16 -- 32, Aug 2018.
[BT16] Victor M. Buchstaber and Svjetlana Terzi´c. Topology and geometry of the canonical
2 and the complex projective space CP 5.
action of T 4 on the complex Grassmannian G4
Mosc. Math. J., 16(2):237 -- 273, 2016.
,
[BT18] Victor M. Buchstaber and Svjetlana Terzic. Toric topology of the complex Grassmann
manifolds. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1802.06449v3, Feb 2018, 1802.06449v3.
[BT19a] V. M. Buchstaber and S. Terzi´c. The foundations of (2n, k)-manifolds. Sbornik: Mathe-
matics, 210(4):508 -- 549, apr 2019.
[BT19b] Victor M. Buchstaber and Svjetlana Terzi´c. Toric topology of the complex Grassmann
manifolds. Moscow Mathematical Journal, 19:397 -- 463, 2019.
[Che19] V. Cherepanov. Orbit spaces of torus actions on Hessenberg varieties. arXiv e-prints,
page arXiv:1905.02294, May 2019, 1905.02294.
[DH98] Igor V. Dolgachev and Yi Hu. Variation of geometric invariant theory quotients. (With an
appendix: "An example of a thick wall" by Nicolas Ressayre). Publ. Math., Inst. Hautes
´Etud. Sci., 87:5 -- 56, 1998.
[Dol12] Igor V. Dolgachev. Classical algebraic geometry. A modern view. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2012.
[GM87] Mark Goresky and Robert MacPherson. On the topology of algebraic torus actions. Al-
gebraic groups, Proc. Symp., Utrecht/Neth. 1986, Lect. Notes Math. 1271, 73-90 (1987).,
1987.
[HK00] Yi Hu and Sean Keel. Mori dream spaces and GIT. Mich. Math. J., 48:331 -- 348, 2000.
[Hu92] Yi Hu. The geometry and topology of quotient varieties of torus actions. Duke Math. J.,
68(1):151 -- 184, 1992.
[KT18] Yael Karshon and Susan Tolman. Topology of complexity one quotients. arXiv e-prints,
Oct 2018, 1810.01026.
[Sko93] Alexei N. Skorobogatov. On a theorem of Enriques -- Swinnerton-Dyer. Ann. Fac. Sci.
Toulouse, Math. (6), 2(3):429 -- 440, 1993.
[Suss18] Hendrik Suss. Orbit spaces of maximal torus actions on oriented grassmannians of planes.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.00981, 2018.
Hendrik Suss, School of Mathematics, The University of Manchester, Alan Turing
Building, Oxford Road Manchester M13 9PL
E-mail address: [email protected]
|
1502.01770 | 1 | 1502 | 2015-02-06T01:43:23 | On surfaces of maximal sectional regularity | [
"math.AG"
] | We study projective surfaces $X \subset \mathbb{P}^r$ (with $r \geq 5$) of maximal sectional regularity and degree $d > r$, hence surfaces for which the Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity $\reg(\mathcal{C})$ of a general hyperplane section curve $\mathcal{C} = X \cap \mathbb{P}^{r-1}$ takes the maximally possible value $d-r+3$. We use the classification of varieties of maximal sectional regularity of \cite{BLPS1} to see that these surfaces are either particular divisors on a smooth rational $3$-fold scroll $S(1,1,1)\subset \mathbb{P}^5$, or else admit a plane $\mathbb{F} = \mathbb{P}^2 \subset \mathbb{P}^r$ such that $X \cap \mathbb{F} \subset \mathbb{F}$ is a pure curve of degree $d-r+3$. We show that our surfaces are either cones over curves of maximal regularity, or almost non-singular projections of smooth rational surface scrolls. We use this to show that the Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity of such a surface $X$ satisfies the equality $\reg(X) = d-r+3$ and we compute or estimate various of the cohomological invariants as well as the Betti numbers of such surfaces. We also study the geometry of extremal secant lines of our surfaces $X$, more precisely the closure $\Sigma(X)$ of the set of all proper extremal secant lines to $X$ in the Grassmannian $\mathbb{G}(1, \mathbb{P}^r).$ | math.AG | math | ON SURFACES OF MAXIMAL SECTIONAL REGULARITY
MARKUS BRODMANN, WANSEOK LEE, EUISUNG PARK, PETER SCHENZEL
Abstract. We study projective surfaces X ⊂ Pr (with r ≥ 5) of maximal sectional reg-
ularity and degree d > r, hence surfaces for which the Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity
reg(C) of a general hyperplane section curve C = X ∩ Pr−1 takes the maximally possible
value d − r + 3. We use the classification of varieties of maximal sectional regularity of
[BLPS1] to see that these surfaces are either particular divisors on a smooth rational
3-fold scroll S(1, 1, 1) ⊂ P5, or else admit a plane F = P2 ⊂ Pr such that X ∩ F ⊂ F
is a pure curve of degree d − r + 3. We show that our surfaces are either cones over
curves of maximal regularity, or almost non-singular projections of smooth rational sur-
face scrolls. We use this to show that the Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity of such a
surface X satisfies the equality reg(X) = d − r + 3 and we compute or estimate various
of the cohomological invariants as well as the Betti numbers of such surfaces. We also
study the geometry of extremal secant lines of our surfaces X, more precisely the closure
Σ(X) of the set of all proper extremal secant lines to X in the Grassmannian G(1, Pr).
5
1
0
2
b
e
F
6
]
.
G
A
h
t
a
m
[
1
v
0
7
7
1
0
.
2
0
5
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
1. Introduction
Varieties of maximal sectional regularity. In [BLPS1] we have studied and classified
projective varieties X ⊂ Pr of dimension n ≥ 2, of codimension c ≥ 3 and of degree
d ≥ c + 3 which are of maximal sectional regularity, which means that the Castelnuovo-
Mumford regularity reg(C) of a general linear curve section C = X ∩ Pc+1 ⊂ Pr of X takes
the maximally possible value d − c + 1. There are two possible types of such varieties,
namely (see also Theorem 2.1 below):
Either it holds c = 3 and X ≈ H + (d − 3)F is a divisor on a rational (n + 1)-fold scroll
W ⊂ Pn+3 with n − 3-dimensional vertex, where H ⊂ W is the hyperplane divisor and
F = Pn ⊂ W is a linear n-space;
or else, there is linear subspace F = F(X) = Pn ⊂ Pr such that X ∩F ⊂ F is a hypersurface
of degree d − c + 1.
If X is of type II, the n-space F(X) is unique and coincides with the so-called extremal
variety of X, that is the closed union of all lines in Pr which are (d − c + 1)-secant
to a general curve section of X. Moreover, if the (algebraically closed) base field k is
of characteristic 0 or if n = 2, each variety X ⊂ Pr of maximal sectional regularity is
sectionally smooth rational (in the sense of Section 2 below) and hence is an almost non-
singular linear projection of a rational n-fold scroll eX ⊂ Pd+n−1 (see Theorem 2.7). In
addition, this projecting scroll eX is singular if and only if X is a cone.
Date: Busan, Halle, Seoul and Zurich, September 25, 2018.
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary: 14H45, 13D02.
Key words and phrases. Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity, variety of maximal sectional regularity, ex-
tremal locus, extremal variety.
2
MARKUS BRODMANN, WANSEOK LEE, EUISUNG PARK, PETER SCHENZEL
Surfaces of maximal sectional regularity. In this paper we focus on the case in which
n = 2, hence the case in which X is a surface of maximal sectional regularity, and we
shall investigate in detail the structure of X. In this case, the above two possible types
present themselves as follows (see Corollary 2.3 below):
Type I: It holds r = 5 and X ≈ H + (d −3)F is a smooth divisor on the smooth rational 3-
fold scroll W = S(1, 1, 1) ⊂ P5, where H ⊂ W is the hyperplane divisor and F = P2 ⊂ W
is a ruling plane.
Type II: There is a plane F = P2 ⊂ Pr such that X ∩ F ⊂ F is a pure curve of degree
d − r + 3.
Moreover in this situation either the projecting surface scroll eX ⊂ Pd+1 is smooth or X is
a cone over a curve of maximal regularity. It turns out that the surfaces in question have
a rich geometric, homological and cohomological structure, which we aim to investigate
in this paper.
Preview of results. Section 2: We give a few preliminaries, which mainly rely on re-
sults established in [BLPS1]. We also establish a bound for the Castelnuovo-Mumford
regularity of varieties which are almost non-singular projections of varieties satisfying the
Green-Lazarsfeld property N2,p (see Theorem 2.9). We shall revisit the extremal secant
locus Σ(X) of an arbitrary non-degenerate irreducible projective variety X ⊂ Pr of degree
d and codimension c ≥ 2, that is the closure of the set of all proper (d − c + 1)-secant lines
to X in the Grassmannian G(1, Pr) of all lines in Pr. This locus is particularly interesting
if X is a surface of extremal regularity and hence satisfies the inequality reg(X) ≥ d−r+3.
We also consider the so-called special extremal locus ∗Σ(X) of a variety X of maximal
sectional regularity, hence the closure of the set of all lines in G(1, Pr) which are (d−r+3)-
secant to a general curve section of X. We show that this latter locus has dimension 2, if
X is a surface of maximal sectional regularity (see Proposition 2.12).
Section 3: We study sectionally smooth rational surfaces, hence surfaces whose general
curve section is smooth and rational -- a property which holds for surfaces of maximal
sectional regularity. As sectionally smooth rational surfaces are almost non-singular pro-
jections of surface scrolls, they have a number of interesting properties and their cohomol-
ogy is quite well understood. In particular, they satisfy the conjectural regularity bound
of Eisenbud-Goto [EG] (see Theorem 3.4). The results of this section will pave our way
for a more detailed investigation of surfaces of maximal sectional regularity.
Section 4 : We investigate surfaces of maximal sectional regularity of type I. In particular,
we compute their Betti tables (see Theorem 4.2) and their cohomological Hilbert func-
tions (see Theorem 4.3). Moreover we show that the special extremal secant locus of such
surfaces coincides with their extremal locus, and we show that these loci become Veronese
Surfaces in a projective 5-space under the Plucker embedding (see Proposition 4.5).
Section 5: We study surfaces of maximal sectional regularity which fall under type II.
We notably investigate the cohomological invariants and the cohomology tables of these
surfaces (see Theorem 5.2 and Corollary 5.3).
If X is a variety of maximal sectional
regularity of dimension n ≥ 2, which falls under type II, the union Y := X ∪ F(X) of
X with its extremal variety F(X) = Pn ⊂ Pr plays a crucial role. As an application of
Theorem 5.2, we shall establish a lower bound on the number of defining quadrics of a
variety of maximal sectional regularity X of type II with arbitrary dimension n ≥ 2 -- a
ON SURFACES OF MAXIMAL SECTIONAL REGULARITY
3
bound which is sharp if and only Y is arithmetically Cohen-Macaulay (see Corollary 5.13).
Finally, in the surface case, we give a comparison result for the Betti numbers of X and
Y (see Proposition 5.14).
Section 6: We study the index of normality N(X) of a surface X of maximal sectional reg-
ularity which falls under type II. In all examples we found, this index is sub-maximal and
hence satisfies the inequality N(X) ≤ d − r. In Theorem 6.2 we give various conditions
which are equivalent to the mentioned sub-maximality of N(X). This sub-maximality
notably implies that the homogeneous vanishing ideal of the union Y = X ∪ F(X) is
generated in degrees ≤ d − r + 2. This latter property allows to draw conclusions on the
geometry of extremal secant lines to X (see Remark 6.3). We also revisit surfaces of
degree r + 1 in Pr and prove, that two of the eleven cases listed in [B2] and [BS4] may
indeed not occur, as conjectured (see Remark 6.4).
Section 7: This section is devoted to examples and open problems. We first provide exam-
ples of large families of surfaces of extremal regularity which are not of maximal sectional
regularity and whose extremal secant locus is of any dimension in the maximally possible
range {−1, 0, 1}. (see Construction and Examples 7.1). This is of some interest, as the
paper [GruLPe] let to the expectation that "there are only a few "exceptional" varieties
of extremal regularity without extremal secant lines". We also provide some examples
which make explicit the Betti tables in the case of surfaces of maximal sectional regularity
which fall under type I (see Example 7.2). We also suggest a general construction princi-
ple which provides large classes of surfaces of maximal sectional regularity of type II (see
Construction and Examples 7.3). We use this principle to produce explicit examples for
which we compute the Betti tables (see Examples 7.4, 7.5 and 7.6). Finally, we give some
conclusive remarks and suggest a few open problems, which are related to the previously
mentioned question on the sub-maximality of the index of normality (see Problems and
Remark 7.7).
2. Preliminaries
The classification of varieties of maximal sectional regularity. Let X ⊂ Pr be
a non-degenerate irreducible projective variety of dimension n ≥ 2, codimension c ≥ 3
and degree d ≥ c + 3. We recall the following classification result on varieties of maximal
sectional regularity, which was established in [BLPS1, Theorem 7.1]
2.1. Theorem. If either n = 2 or Char(k) = 0, the variety X ⊂ Pr is of maximal sectional
regularity if and only if it falls under one of the following two types:
Type I: c = 3 and X is a divisor of the (n + 1)-fold scroll
W := S( 0, . . . , 0
, 1, 1, 1) ⊂ Pn+3
(n−2)−times
{z }
with X ≈ H + (d − 3)F , where H is the hyperplane divisor of W and F ⊂ W is a
linear subspace of dimension n.
Type II: There exists an n-dimensional linear subspace F = Pn ⊂ Pr such that
X ∩ F ⊂ F is a hypersurface of degree d − c + 1.
4
MARKUS BRODMANN, WANSEOK LEE, EUISUNG PARK, PETER SCHENZEL
2.2. Remark. The previous classification result allows to conclude that there exist va-
rieties X ⊂ Pr of maximal sectional regularity of dimension n, of codimension c and of
degree d for any given triplet (n, c, d) with n ≥ 2, c ≥ 3 and d ≥ c + 3.
For the purposes of the present paper, we notice in particular the following result (see
also [BLPS1, Theorem 6.3]):
2.3. Corollary. Let 5 ≤ r < d. Then, a non-degenerate irreducible projective surface
X ⊂ Pr of degree d is of maximal sectional regularity if and only if it falls under one of
the following two types:
Type I: r = 5 and X is a divisor of the smooth 3-fold scroll W := S(1, 1, 1) ⊂ P5
with X ≈ H + (d − 3)F , where H is the hyperplane divisor of W and F ⊂ W is a
ruling plane. In this case, the surface X is smooth.
Type II: There exists a plane F = P2 ⊂ P5 such that X ∩ F ⊂ F is a pure curve
of degree d − r + 3. In this case, the surface X is singular.
We now introduce the notion of sectional regularity and characterize surfaces of maximal
sectional regularity by means of this invariant.
2.4. Remark and Definition. (A) Let X ⊂ Pr = Proj(S := k[x0, x1, . . . , xr]) be a non-
degenerate irreducible projective variety of dimension n ≥ 2, of codimension c ≥ 2 and of
degree d. We introduce the notation
Hh := Proj(S/hS) for all h ∈ S1 =
and we define the sectional regularity of X by
kxi with h 6= 0},
rXi=0
sreg(X) := min{reg(X ∩ Hh) h ∈ S1 \ {0}}.
As the regularity is semi-continuous on hyperplane sections, we can say that
W(X) := {h ∈ S1 \ {0} reg(X ∩ Hh) = sreg(X)} is a dense open subset of S1 \ {0}.
Now, there is a dense open subset U ⊆ W such that X ∩ Hh is an integral scheme, and
we denote the largest of these open sets by U(X).
(B) Now, assume that 4 ≤ r < d and that X ⊂ Pr = Proj(S := k[x0, x1, . . . , xr]) is a
non-degenerate irreducible projective surface of degree d. In this situation
Ch := X ∩ Hh is an integral curve of degree d with reg(Ch) = sreg(X) for all h ∈ U(X).
Hence, in particular we see that
sreg(X) ≤ d − r + 3 with equality if and only if X is of maximal sectional regularity.
Curves of maximal regularity. As the generic linear curve sections of varieties of
maximal sectional regularity are curves of maximal regularity, it will be useful for us to
keep in mind the following fact.
2.5. Proposition. Let r ≥ 4 and let C ⊂ Pr be a curve of degree d ≥ r + 2 which is
of maximal sectional regularity, so that reg(C) = d − r + 2. Then C admits a unique
(d − r + 2)-secant line L. Moreover, if d ≥ 3r − 3, then depth(C ∪ L) = 1.
ON SURFACES OF MAXIMAL SECTIONAL REGULARITY
5
Proof. The existence of the (d − r + 2)-secant line L follows from the classification of
curves of maximal regularity given in [GruLPe]. The uniqueness of the extremal secant
line L follows by [BS2, (3.1)].
Assume now that d ≥ 3r − 3. Note that S := Join(L, C) ⊂ Pr is a rational normal 3-fold
scroll of type S(0, 0, r − 1) whose vertex S(0, 0) ⊂ S(0, 0, 1) equals L. So, in degree 2,
the homogeneous vanishing ideals IC and IS of C respectively of S in S := k[x0.x1, . . . , xr]
satisfy the relation
2 (cid:19).
dimk(IC)2 ≥ dimk(IS)2 =(cid:18)r − 2
Assume now that depth(C ∪ L) 6= 1, so that C ∪ L is arithmetically Cohen-Macaulay.
Then, by [BS2, Proposition 3.3] it follows that
dimk(IC)2 =(cid:18)r + 1
2 (cid:19) − d − 1, whence(cid:18)r − 2
2 (cid:19) ≤(cid:18)r + 1
2 (cid:19) − d − 1,
and this yields the contradiction that d ≤ 3r − 4.
(cid:3)
Sectionally rational varieties. It is most important, that each variety X of maximal
sectional regularity is sectionally rational, which means that its general curve section is
rational. If the general curve section of X is even smooth and rational, we say that X
is sectionally smooth rational. A particularly interesting property of sectionally rational
varieties is the fact, that they are birational linear projections of varieties of minimal
degree. To make this statement more precise, we first give the following definition.
2.6. Definition and Remark. (A) We define the singular locus of a finite morphism
f : X ′ −→ X of noetherian schemes by
Observe, that we also may write
Sing(f ) := {x ∈ X length(cid:0)f −1(x)(cid:1) ≥ 2}.
Sing(f ) = Supp(cid:0)(f∗OX ′)/OX(cid:1).
(B) We say that the finite morphism f : X ′ −→ X is almost non-singular if its singular
locus Sing(f ) is a finite set.
Now, we have the following result (see [BLPS1, Theorem 4.1]).
2.7. Theorem. Let X ⊂ Pr be a non-degenerate irreducible sectionally rational projective
variety of dimension n ≥ 2 and degree d. Assume furthermore that char(k) = 0 or n = 2.
Then, we may write
(c) πΛ : Pd+n−1 \ Λ −→ Pr is the linear projection map from Λ and
(a) X = πΛ(eX), where eX ⊂ Pd+n−1 is an n-dimensional variety of minimal degree,
(b) Λ = Pd+n−r−2 ⊂ Pd+n−1 is a linear subspace with eX ∩ Λ = ∅,
(d) the induced finite morphism πΛ : eX → X is the normalization of X.
Moreover, if d ≥ 5, then eX is a rational n-fold scroll. Finally, if X is a sectionally smooth
rational surface, the morphism πΛ : eX → X is almost non-singular.
6
MARKUS BRODMANN, WANSEOK LEE, EUISUNG PARK, PETER SCHENZEL
A regularity bound for almost non-singular projections. We know by Theo-
rem 2.7, that sectionally smooth rational surfaces are almost non-singular linear pro-
jections of rational normal scrolls. This will allow us to prove that these surfaces satisfy
the conjectural Eisenbud-Goto bound. In this subsection, we shall actually prove a much
more general bounding result for the regularity of almost non-singular linear projections.
2.8. Definition. (A) Let p ∈ N. The graded ideal I ⊂ S := k[x0, x1, . . . , xr] is said to
satisfy the (Green-Lazarsfeld) property N2,p (see [GrL]) if the Betti numbers of S/I satisfy
the condition
βi,j := βS
i,j(S/I) = βS
i−1,j+1(I) = 0 whenever i ≤ p and j 6= 1,
-- hence if the minimal free resolution of I is linear up to the homological degree p -- and
thus has the form
. . . → Sβp,1(−p − 1) → . . . → Sβ1,1(−2) → I → 0.
(B) The closed subscheme Z ⊂ Pr is said to satisfy the property N2,p if its homogeneous
vanishing ideal IZ ⊂ S satisfies the property N2,p.
Now, we may prove the announced regularity bound for almost non-singular projections
of N2,p-varieties.
2.9. Theorem. Let r′ ≥ r be integers, let X ′ ⊂ Pr′ be a non-degenerate projective variety
of dimension ≥ 2 which satisfies the property N2,p for some p ≥ max{2, r′ − r + 1}. Let
Λ = Pr′−r−1 be a subspace such that X ′ ∩ Λ = ∅ and let πΛ : Pr′ \ Λ :։ Pr be the linear
projection from Λ. Let X := πΛ(X ′) ⊂ Pr and assume that the induced finite morphism
πΛ : X ′ ։ X is almost non-singular. Then
(a) The homogeneous vanishing ideal IX ⊂ S of X is generated by homogeneous poly-
nomials of degrees ≤ r′ − r + 2.
(b) reg(X) ≤ max{reg(X ′), r′ − r + 2}.
Proof. Let IX ′ ⊂ S′ := k[x0, x1, . . . , xr, xr+1, . . . , xr′] = S[xr+1, . . . , xr′] be the homoge-
neous vanishing ideal of X ′ ⊂ Pr′ = Proj(S′) and let A′ := S′/IX ′ be the homogeneous
coordinate ring of X ′. We assume that Λ = Proj(S′/(x0, x1, . . . , xr)S′), consider A′ as
a finitely generated graded S-module and set t := r′ − r. As X ′ satisfies the condition
N2,p with p ≥ max{2, t + 1}, it follows by [AK, Theorem 3.6], that the minimal free
presentation of A′ has the shape
Ss(−2) v→ S ⊕ St(−1)
q→ A′ → 0
for some s ∈ N. Moreover, the coordinate ring A = S/IX of X is nothing else than the
image q(S) under q of the direct summand S ⊂ S ⊕ St(−1). Therefore
A′/A ∼= Coker(cid:0)u : Ss(−2) → St(−1)(cid:1),
where u is the composition of the map v : Ss(−2) → S ⊕ St(−1) with the canonical
projection map w : S ⊕ St(−1) ։ St(−1). Hence, the S-module (A′/A)(1) is generated
by t homogeneous elements of degree 0 and related in degree 1. As Sing(πΛ) is finite, we
have dim(A′/A) ≤ 1. So, it follows by [ChFN, Corollary 2.4] that reg(cid:0)(A′/A)(1)(cid:1) ≤ t − 1,
whence reg(A′/A) ≤ t. Now, the short exact sequence 0 → A → A′ → A′/A → 0
ON SURFACES OF MAXIMAL SECTIONAL REGULARITY
7
implies that reg(A) ≤ max{reg(A′), t + 1}.
It follows that reg(X) = reg(A) + 1 ≤
max{reg(A′) + 1, t + 2} = max{reg(X ′), t + 2} = max{reg(X ′), r′ − r + 2}. This proves
claim (b).
To prove claim (a), observe that IX = Ker(q) ∩ S occurs in the short exact sequence
w↾→ Im(u) → 0, where w ↾ is the restriction of
of graded S-modules 0 → IX → Im(v)
the above projection map w. In particular, we may identify w ↾ with the canonical map
Ss(−2)/ Ker(v) ։ Ss(−2)/ Ker(u).
In view of
u→ St(−1) → A′/A → 0, we finally get
the exact sequence 0 → Ker(u) → Ss(−2)
reg(Ker(u)) ≤ t + 2 = r′ − r + 2. Therefore Ker(u) is generated in degrees ≤ r′ − r + 2,
and hence so is IX. This proves statement (a).
(cid:3)
∼= Ker(u)/ Ker(v).
It follows, that IX
Extremal secant loci and extremal varieties. In this subsection, we recall a few
facts on the geometry of proper (d − c + 1)-secant lines to a non-degenerate irreducible
projective variety X ⊂ Pr of codimension c and degree d. We also recall the related
notion of extremal secant locus Σ(X) of X, that is, the closure of the set of all proper
(d − c + 1)-secant lines of X in the Grassmannian G(1, Pr).
2.10. Notation and Reminder. (See [BLPS1, Notation and Reminder 3.1]) (A) Let
X ⊂ Pr be as above and let
Σ(X) := {L ∈ G(1, Pr) d − c + 1 ≤ length(X ∩ L) < ∞}
denotes the extremal secant locus of X. Keep in mind, that setting n := dim(X) = r − c
we can say (see [BLPS1, Theorem 3.4])
dim(cid:0)Σ(X)(cid:1) ≤ 2n − 2 with equality if and only if X is of maximal sectional regularity.
(B) Keep the above notations and hypotheses and let U(X) denote the largest open subset
U ⊂ G(c + 1, Pr) such that
CΛ := X ∩ Λ ⊂ Λ = Pc+1 is an integral curve of maximal regularity for all Λ ∈ U.
Observe that
X is of maximal sectional regularity if and only if U(X) 6= ∅.
We introduce a subset of the extremal locus of a variety of maximal sectional regularity,
which reflects in a particular way the nature of these varieties. We use this set to define
the extremal variety of a variety of maximal sectional regularity.
2.11. Notation and Reminder. (See [BLPS1, Section 5]) (A) Let the notations and
hypotheses be as in Notation and Reminder 2.10, and assume that X is of dimension
n ≥ 2 and of maximal sectional regularity, so that U(X) 6= ∅. For all Λ ∈ U(X) let
LΛ ∈ Σ(X) denote the unique (d − c + 1)-secant line to the curve CΛ ⊂ Λ = Pc+1 (see
Notation and Reminder 2.10 (B) and Proposition 2.5), so that
LΛ ∈ G(1, Pr) with
length(CΛ ∩ LΛ) = length(X ∩ LΛ) = d − c + 1.
The (d − c + 1)-secant lines of the form LΛ with Λ ∈ U(X) are called special extremal
secant lines, whereas the set
∗Σ(X) := {LΛ Λ ∈ U(X)} ⊆ Σ(X) ⊂ G(1, Pr)
8
MARKUS BRODMANN, WANSEOK LEE, EUISUNG PARK, PETER SCHENZEL
is called the special extremal secant locus of X. If n = 1, then 4 ≤ r < d and X ⊂ Pr is
a curve of maximal sectional regularity, and hence admits a unique extremal secant line
L ∈ G(1, Pr) (see Proposition 2.5). So, we define ∗Σ(X) := {L} in this case.
(B) We define the extremal variety and the extended extremal variety of X respectively
by
F(X) := [Λ∈U (X)
LΛ
( ⊆ ) F+(X) := [L∈Σ(X)
L.
(C) Keep the previous notations and hypotheses, and assume that 5 ≤ r < d. Let
X ⊂ Pr = Proj(cid:0)S := k[x0, x1, . . . , xr](cid:1) be a surface of maximal sectional regularity, so
that c + 1 = r − 1 and sreg(X) = d − r + 3. Then, in the notations of Remark and
definition 2.4 we have
U(X) = {h ∈ S1 \ {0} Proj(S/hS) ∈ U(X)}.
Moreover, for each h ∈ U(X), the line Lh := LHh is the unique (d − r + 3)-secant line to
the curve of maximal regularity Ch ⊂ Hh, and hence the line defined by the condition
Lh ∈ G(1, Pr) with
length(Ch ∩ Lh) = length(X ∩ Lh) = d − r + 3.
Now, according to [BLPS1, Theorem 6.3] we can say:
(a) If X is of type I, then the extremal variety F(X) and the extended extremal variety
F+(X) of X both coincide with the smooth 3-fold scroll W = S(1, 1, 1) ⊂ Pr of
Corollary 2.3.
(b) If X is of type II, then the extremal variety F(X) of X coincides with the plane
F = P2 ⊂ Pr of Corollary 2.3.
The following result says that the extremal secant locus and the special extremal secant
locus of a variety of maximal sectional regularity have the same dimension.
2.12. Proposition. Let c ≥ 3, let d ≥ c + 3, let n ≥ 1 and X ⊂ Pr be a non-degenerate
irreducible variety of dimension n and degree d which is of maximal sectional regularity.
Proof. As ∗Σ(X) ⊆ Σ(X) it follows by the last observation made in Notation and Re-
Then dim(cid:0)∗Σ(X)(cid:1) = 2n − 2.
minder 2.10 (A) that dim(cid:0)∗Σ(X)(cid:1) ≤ dim(cid:0)Σ(X)(cid:1) ≤ 2n − 2. It remains to show, that
dim(cid:0)∗Σ(X)(cid:1) ≥ 2n − 2.
We proceed by induction on n. If n = 1, then our claim is clear by the definition of ∗Σ(X)
(see Notation and Reminder 2.11 (A)). So, let n > 1 and let H = Pr−1 ⊂ Pr be a general
hyperplane. Then X ∩ H ⊂ H is a variety of dimension n − 1, codimension c and degree
d, which is of maximal sectional regularity. Moreover, each special extremal secant line
L ∈ ∗Σ(X ∩ H) to X ∩ H is a special extremal secant line to X. Therefore, we can say
that ∗Σ(X ∩ H) ⊆ ∗Σ(X) ∩ G(1, H).
By induction, we have dim(cid:0)∗Σ(X ∩ H)(cid:1) ≥ 2(n − 1) − 2 = 2n − 4. If we apply [BLPS1,
Lemma 3.2] with T = ∗Σ(X) we obtain dim(cid:0)∗Σ(X)(cid:1) ≥ dim(cid:0)∗Σ(X) ∩ G(1, H)) + 2. This
proves our claim.
(cid:3)
ON SURFACES OF MAXIMAL SECTIONAL REGULARITY
9
3. Sectionally Smooth Rational Surfaces
The projecting scroll. In this section we investigate sectionally smooth rational sur-
faces. We do this, because surfaces of maximal sectional regularity are sectionally smooth
rational. Let us recall first, that according to Theorem 2.7 we can say.
3.1. Corollary. Let X ⊂ Pr be a non-degenerate irreducible projective and sectionally
smooth rational surface of degree d with r ≥ 4 and d ≥ r + 1.
Then, there exists a unique non-negative integer a ≤ d
2 such that X = πΛ(eX), where
eX = S(a, d − a) ⊂ Pd+1 and
(a) Λ = Pd−r ⊂ Pd+1 is a subspace such that eX ∩ Λ = ∅,
(c) the induced finite morphism πΛ : eX → X is almost non-singular and coincides
(d) eX is smooth (or, equivalently, a > 0) if and only if X is not a cone.
3.2. Definition. In the above situation, we call eX = S(a, d − a) the projecting scroll
of the surface X, Λ ⊂ Pr the projecting center for X and πΛ : eX ։ X the standard
(b) πΛ : Pd+1 \ Λ → Pr is the linear projection map from Λ,
with the normalization of X, and
normalization of X.
Algebraic and cohomological properties. The precise aim of this section is to inves-
tigate a few algebraic and geometric properties of sectionally smooth rational surfaces,
which are encoded in Corollary 3.1. We begin with a few preliminaries.
3.3. Notation and Reminder. Let X ⊂ Pr = Proj(S := k[x0, . . . , xr]) be a non-
degenerate irreducible projective surface of degree d, homogeneous vanishing ideal I ⊂ S
and homogeneous coordinate ring A = S/I.
(A) (see [BS4]) For any graded ideal b ⊆ A+ := S+A and any graded A-module M
(i ∈ N0)
let Db(M) := lim−→ HomA(bn, M) denote the b-transform of M, and let H i
denote the i-th local cohomology module of M, both furnished with their natural grading.
We usulally will write H i(M) instead of H i
Let a ⊆ A+ be the graded radical ideal which defines the non-Cohen-Macaulay locus
X \ CM(X) of X. Observe that height a ≥ 2, so that the a-transform
A+(M).
b(M),
of A is a positively graded finite birational integral extension domain of A. In particular
B(A)0 = k. Moreover B(A) has the second Serre-property S2. As Proj(B(A)) is of
dimension 2, it thus is a locally Cohen-Macaulay scheme.
If E is a finite graded integral extension domain of A which satisfies the property S2,
we have A ⊂ B(A) ⊂ E. So B(A) is the least finite graded integral extension domain
of A which has the property S2. Therefore, we call B(A) the S2-cover of A. We also
can describe B(A) as the endomorphism ring End(K(A), K(A)) of the canonical module
K(A) = K 3(A) = Extr−2
(B) The inclusion map A → B(A) gives rise to a finite morphism
S (A, S(−r − 1)) of A.
π : eX := Proj(B(A)) ։ X, with Sing(π) = X \ CM(X).
B(A) := Da(A) = lim−→ HomA(an, A) = [n∈N
(A :Quot(A) an) =Mn∈Z
Γ(CM(Z), OZ(n))
10
MARKUS BRODMANN, WANSEOK LEE, EUISUNG PARK, PETER SCHENZEL
In particular π is almost non-singular and hence birational. Moreover, for any finite
morphism ρ : Y ։ X such that Y is locally Cohen-Macaulay, there is a unique morphism
σ : Y → eX such that ρ = π◦σ. In addition σ is an isomorphism if and only if Sing(ρ) = X\
CM(X). Therefore, the morphism π : eX ։ X is addressed as the finite Macaulayfication
of X. Keep in mind, that -- unlike to what happens with normalization -- there may be
proper birational morphisms τ : Z ։ X with Z locally Cohen-Macaulay, which do not
factor through π (see [B1]).
(C) We also introduce the invariants
ex(X) := length(H 1
mX,x(OX,x)), (x ∈ X closed ) and e(X) := Xx∈X,closed
ex(X).
Note that the latter counts the number of non-Cohen-Macaulay points of X in a weighted
way. Keep in mind that
e(X) = h1(X, OX (j)) = h2(Pr, IX (j)) for all j ≪ 0.
Now, we are ready to prove the following result on sectionally smooth rational surfaces.
3.4. Theorem. Let X ⊂ Pr be a non-degenerate irreducible projective and sectionally
smooth rational surface of degree d with r ≥ 4 and d ≥ r + 2. Then it holds
(a) reg(X) ≤ d − r + 3.
(b) Reg(X) = Nor(X) = CM(X).
cover B(A) of the homogeneous coordinate ring A of X ⊂ Pr and the standard
(c) The homogeneous coordinate ring of the projecting scroll eX ⊂ Pd+1 is the S2-
normalization πΛ : eX → X is the finite Macaulayfication of X.
(d) If e(X) = 0, then h2(Pr, IX(j)) = 0 for all j ∈ Z. If e(X) 6= 0, then
h2(Pr, IX(j))
= e(X)
= e(X) + h1(Pr, IX (1)) + r − d − 1
≤ max{0, h2(Pr, IX(j − 1)) − 1}
≤ 1
= 0
for all j ≤ 0;
for j = 1;
for all j > 1;
for j = d − r;
for all j ≥ d − r + 1.
(e) h3(Pr, IX(j)) = h2(eX, O eX(j)) for all j ∈ Z, thus
h3(Pr, IX(j)) =( (j+1)(dj+2)
0
2
for all j ≤ −2,
for all j ≥ −1.
and this proves our claim.
(b): As X is a surface, we have Reg(X) ⊂ Nor(X) ⊂ CM(X). Therefore, it suffices to
show that CM(X) ⊂ Reg(X).
Proof. (a): The projecting scroll eX ⊂ Pd+1 satisfies the conditions N2,p for all p ∈ N, so
that reg(eX) = 2. Therefore, by Theorem 2.9 we get reg(X) ≤ (d − 1) − r + 2 = d − r + 3,
So, let x ∈ CM(X) be a closed point. We always write π := πΛ. Then (cid:0)π∗O eX(cid:1)x is a
finite integral extension domain of the local 2-dimensional CM ring (OX,x, mX,x). As the
ON SURFACES OF MAXIMAL SECTIONAL REGULARITY
11
morphism π : eX → X is almost non-singular, the finitely generated OX,x-module
(cid:0)(π∗O eX)/OX(cid:1)x =(cid:0)π∗O eX(cid:1)x/OX,x
is annihilated by some power of mX,x and hence contained in the local cohomology module
H 1
mX,x(OX,x). But this latter module vanishes because OX,x is a local CM-ring of dimension
> 1. This shows, that x /∈ Sing(π).
O eX,ex
∼= OX,x.
But this means, that x has a unique preimageex ∈ eX under the morphism π and that
Assume now, that x /∈ Reg(X). Then ex /∈ Reg(eX). This means that eX ⊂ Pd+1 is a
singular 2-fold scroll with vertex ex. But this implies that the tangent space Tex(eX) of eX
atex has dimension d + 1. In view of the above isomorphism, we thus get the contradiction
(c): Let E denote the homogeneous coordinate ring of the projecting scroll eX ⊂ Pd+1. As
that the tangent space Tx(X) of X ⊂ Pr at x has dimension d+1. This proves that indeed
x ∈ Reg(X).
E is a CM ring, we have canonical inclusions of graded rings
(A :Quot(A) an) ⊂ E
A ⊂ B(A) = [n∈N
(see Notation and Reminder 3.3 (A)). Keeping in mind statement (b) and observing that
Proj(A/a) = X \ CM(X) = X \ Nor(X) = Sing(πΛ)
the projection morphism πΛ : eX −→ X provides the normalization of X, we thus get
and hence E ⊂Sn∈N(A :Quot(A) an) = B(A). Therefore E = B(A) and statement (c) is
shown.
(d): Let B := B(A) as above, let D := DA+(A) and consider the short exact sequence of
graded S-modules
0 −→ D −→ B −→ C −→ 0.
Observe that dim(C) ≤ 1, depth(C) > 0 and that eC ∼= F := π∗O eX /OX, so that
dimk(DA+(C)j) = e(X) for all j ∈ Z.
As B is a Cohen-Macaulay module of dimension 3, we have
H 2
∗ (Pr, IX) ∼= H 2(A) ∼= H 2(D) ∼= H 1(C) ∼= DA+(C)/C.
Hence, if e(X) = 0, we have indeed h2(Pr, IX(j)) = 0 for all j ∈ Z.
So, let e(X) > 0. As Cj = 0 for all j ≤ 0 we get that h2(Pr, IX(j)) = e(X) for all
j ≤ 0. As dimk(D1) = r + 1 + h1(Pr, IX(1)), we have dimk(C1) = dimk(B1) − dimk(D1) =
d + 2 −(cid:0)r + 1 + h1(Pr, IX(1))(cid:1) and hence
h2(Pr, IX (1)) = dimk(DA+(C)1) − dimk(C1) = e(X) − dimk(C1) =
= e(X) − h1(Pr, IX(1)) + r − d − 1.
Observe that C is a Cohen-Macaulay module of dimension 1. Moreover, the regularity of
B as an A-module and as a B-module take the same value reg(B) = reg(eX) − 1 = 1, so
that the A-module B is generated in degree 1. Therefore, the A-module C is generated
12
MARKUS BRODMANN, WANSEOK LEE, EUISUNG PARK, PETER SCHENZEL
in degree 1, and hence dimk(H 1(C)j) ≤ max{0, dimk(H 1(C)j−1) − 1} for all j > 1 (see for
example [BS1]). Therefore we get indeed h2(Pr, IX(j)) ≤ max{0, h2(Pr, IX(j − 1)) − 1}
for all j > 1.
By statement (a) we have h2(Pr, IX (j)) = 0 for all j ≥ d − r + 1.
Finally, let us consider the exact sequence
0 −→ IX (−1) −→ IX −→ IC −→ 0,
where C = X ∩ H (H ∈ G(r − 1, Pr)) is a general hyperplane section of X. As C ⊂
H = Pr−1 is a smooth rational curve of degree d, we have h1(Pr−1, IC(1)) = d − r + 1 and
h1(Pr−1, IC(j + 1)) ≤ max{0, h1(Pr−1, IC(j)) − 1} for all j ≥ 1, so that h1(Pr−1, IC(d − r +
1)) ≤ 1. Applying the above exact sequence and keeping in mind that h2(Pr, IX (d − r +
1)) = 0 we get h2(Pr, IX(d − r)) ≤ 1. and this proves our claim.
(e): Let the notation be as above. As the sheaf F := π∗O eX/OX has finite support, the
sequence
0 −→ OX −→ π∗O eX −→ F −→ 0
together with the well known formulas for the cohomology of a rational surface scroll
yields that
h3(Pr, IX(j)) = h2(X, OX(j)) = h2(eX, O eX(j)) =( (j+1)(dj+2)
0,
2
This proves statement (e).
,
if j ≤ −2,
if j ≥ −1.
(cid:3)
Local properties. Finally, we want to give the following result, in which multz(Z) is
used to denote the multiplicity of the noetherian scheme Z at the point z ∈ Z.
3.5. Proposition. Let X ⊂ Pr be a non-degenerate irreducible projective and sectionally
standard normalization of X. Then it holds:
smooth rational surface of degree d with r ≥ 4 and d ≥ r + 2. Let π = πΛ : eX ։ X be the
(a) If x ∈ Sing(X), then 2 ≤ length(π−1(x)) ≤ max{multx(X), ex(X) + 1}.
(b) If K ∈ G(k, Pr) with 0 ≤ k ≤ r − 1 and dim(X ∩ K) ≤ 0, then
x ∈ Sing(X), then dim(X ∩ hx, Li) = 1.
(c) If L ∈ G(1, Pr) is a proper extremal secant line to X with X ∩ L ⊂ Reg(X), and
length(cid:0) Reg(X) ∩ K(cid:1) + 2#(cid:0) Sing(X) ∩ K(cid:1) ≤ d − r + k + 2.
Indeed, as x is an isolated point of Sing(X) = Sing(πΛ) and as eX is a
Cohen-Macaulay surface, the semilocal ring O eX,x := (cid:0)π∗O eX,x(cid:1)x is a Cohen-Macaulay
mX,x(OX,x) ∼= O eX,x/OX,x. As
Proof. (a):
finite integral extension domain of the local ring OX,x and H 1
π−1(x) ∼= O eX,x/mX,xO eX,x our claim follows easily.
(b): Let K′ := (π′
linear projection π′
π : eX ։ X induces an isomorphism
Λ : Pd+1 \ Λ ։ Pr. Then eX ∩ K′ = π−1(X ∩ K), and so the morphism
π ↾: eX ∩ K′ \(cid:2)π−1(cid:0)Sing(π) ∩ K(cid:1)(cid:3) ∼=−→ X ∩ K \(cid:0)Sing(π) ∩ K(cid:1) = Reg(X) ∩ K.
Λ)−1(K) ∈ G(d − r + k + 1, Pd+1) be the closed preimage of K under the
ON SURFACES OF MAXIMAL SECTIONAL REGULARITY
13
the first inequality of statement (a).
(c): Observe, that K := hx, Li is a plane. Assume that dim(X ∩ K) ≤ 0. Then, by
statement (b) we get
Moreover eX ∩ K′ is of dimension ≤ 0. As eX ⊆ Pd+1 is a surface scroll and K ∈ G(d − r +
k + 1, Pd+1), we get that length(eX ∩ K′) ≤ d − r + k + 2. Now, our statement follows by
d − r + 5 ≤ length(X ∩ L) + 2 ≤ length(cid:0)Reg(X) ∩ K(cid:1) + 2#(cid:0)Sing(X) ∩ K(cid:1) ≤ d − r + 4.
This contradiction proves our claim.
(cid:3)
4. Surfaces of Type I
The Betti numbers. In this section we study the surfaces which fall under type I of
our classification. We begin by investigating their Betti numbers.
4.1. Convention and Remark. (A) Let X ⊂ P5 denote a projective surface contained
in a smooth rational three-fold scroll in P5, hence that
X ⊂ W := S(1, 1, 1) ⊂ P5.
We assume furthermore that the divisor X ⊂ W satisfies
X ≈ H + (d − 3)F for some d ≥ 5,
where H is a hyperplane section and F is a plane of W . Then it is easy to check that
deg(X) = d and reg(X) = d − 2.
(B) With the definition of the Betti numbers and the Betti diagram we follow the
notations suggested by D. Eisenbud (see [E]). So, if Z ⊂ Pr is a closed subscheme, with
homogeneous vanishing ideal IZ ⊂ S := k[x0, x1, . . . , xr] and homogeneous coordinate
ring AZ := S/IZ, we write
βi,j = βi,j(Z) := dimk(cid:0)TorS
i (k, AZ)i+j(cid:1) for all i ∈ N0 and all j ∈ Z.
As usually, if Z is non-degenerate, we list this numbers only the range 1 ≤ i ≤ r + 1 −
depth(Z) and 1 ≤ j < reg(Z)
4.2. Theorem. In the previous notation we have the following Betti diagram of X
i
βi,1
βi,2
...
1
3
0
...
0
2
2
0
...
0
3
0
0
...
0
4
0
0
...
0
5
0
0
...
0
βi,d−4
βi,d−3 β1,d−3 β2,d−3 β3,d−3 β4,d−3 β5,d−3
with the following entries
2 (cid:19),
β1,d−3 =(cid:18)d − 1
β2,d−3 = 2(d − 1)(d − 3),
β3,d−3 = 3(d2 − 5d + 5)
β4,d−3 = 2(d − 2)(d − 4)
2 (cid:19).
and β5,d−3 =(cid:18)d − 3
14
MARKUS BRODMANN, WANSEOK LEE, EUISUNG PARK, PETER SCHENZEL
Proof. As in Convention and Remark 4.1 (A), we put W = S(1, 1, 1), and denote the
coordinate rings of X and W by AX and AW respectively. Then there is a short exact
sequence
0 → IX /IW → AW → AX → 0
of graded S-modules, where IW denotes the defining ideal of W ⊂ P5. In a first step we
compute the Hilbert series
H(IX/IW , t) =Xn∈Z
dimk[IX /IW ]n · tn
of IX/IW . By applying sheaf cohomology to the corresponding short exact sequence
0 → IX/IW → OW → OX → 0 we obtain an isomorphism
[IX/IW ]n
∼= H 0(W, OW (−X + nH)) ∼= H 0(W, OW ((n − 1)H − (d − 3)F )).
Therefore, it follows that
0
dimk[IX /IW ]n =((cid:0)n+1
2 (cid:19)(n−d+3)tn =
2 (cid:1)(n − d + 3)
(1 − t)4(cid:0)(cid:18)d − 1
td−2
if n ≥ d − 2
if n < d − 2
2 (cid:19)−(d−1)(d−4)t+(cid:18)d − 3
2 (cid:19)t2(cid:1).
As an application to the Hilbert series H(IX/IW , t) it turns out that
H(IX/IW , t) = Xn≥d−2(cid:18)n + 1
The formula for the expression of the generating function as a rational function might be
proven directly or by some Computer Algebra System. The Hilbert series of AY is given
by H(AW , t) = (1 + 2t)/(1 − t)4. By the above short exact sequence of graded modules it
follows that
H(AX, t) =
1
(1 − t)4(cid:0)1 + 2t −(cid:18)d − 1
2 (cid:19)td−2 + (d − 1)(d − 4)td−1 −(cid:18)d − 3
2 (cid:19)td(cid:1).
As a consequence of [P, Remark 4.8 (2)] the Betti diagram of X now must have the shape
as indicated in the statement. In particular the first row has the stated form. For the sake
of simplicity, we put βi,d−3 = βi, i = 1, . . . , 5. Then by the additivity of the Hilbert series
on short exact sequences of graded S-modules the Betti diagram implies the following
form of the Hilbert series H(AX, t)
H(AX, t) =
1
(1 − t)6(cid:0)1 − 3t2 − β1td−2 + 2t3 + β2td−1 − β3td + β4td+1 − β5td+2(cid:1).
By comparing both expressions for our Hilbert series we obtain the desired values for the
remaining Betti numbers.
(cid:3)
Cohomological properties. We now provide a result which summarizes some cohomo-
logical properties of surfaces of type I. It is worth noticing that in this case the values for
the sheaf cohomology of OX and IX , and hence also the index of normality
N(X) := sup{j ∈ N h1(Pr, IX (j)) 6= 0} (∈ N ∪ {−∞})
of X are completely determined.
ON SURFACES OF MAXIMAL SECTIONAL REGULARITY
15
4.3. Theorem. With the previous notation there are the following equalities for the coho-
mology:
(a) h1(P5, IX (j)) =(cid:0)j+1
2 (cid:1)(d − j − 3) for 1 ≤ j ≤ d − 4 and zero else.
(b) h0(X, OX (j)) = 1/2(j + 1)(dj + 2) for all j ≥ 0 and zero else.
(c) h1(X, OX (j)) = 0 for all j ∈ Z.
(d) h2(X, OX (−j)) = 1/2(j − 1)(dj − 2) for all j ≥ 2 and zero else.
Proof. We start with the proof of (a), using the notations introduced in Convention and
Remark 4.1. Clearly H 1(P5, IX (j)) = 0 for all j ≤ 0. So let j ≥ 1. Then we use the short
exact sequence
0 → IW → IX → OW (−X) → 0.
Since W is arithmetically Cohen-Macaulay, this sequence yields that H i(P5, IW (j)) =
0 for i = 1, 2 and all j ∈ Z. Therefore the long exact cohomology sequence induces
isomorphisms H 1(P5, IX(j)) ∼= H 1(W, OW (jH − X)) for all j ∈ Z. Because of X ≈
H + (d − 3)F it follows that
h1(P5, IX(j)) = h1(W, OW ((j − 1)H − (d − 3)F ) =(cid:18)j + 1
2 (cid:19)h1(P1, OP1(j + 2 − d)).
By duality we get h1(P1, OP1(j + 2 − d)) = h0(P1, OP1(d − j − 4)). This proves statement
(a).
Because of h1(P5, IX (1)) = d − 4 (as shown in (a)) and because of deg(X) = d, the
linearly normal embedding of X implies that X ⊂ P5 is isomorphic to the linear pro-
jection of a smooth rational normal surface scroll X ⊂ Pd+1. As a consequence we have
H i(X, OX(j)) ∼= H i( X, O X (j)) for all i, j ∈ Z. Since X is arithmetically Cohen-Macaulay
this yields statement in (c).
The Hilbert function
j 7→ hA X
(j) := dimk[A X ]j = h0( X, O X(j))
of the coordinate ring A X is given by 1/2(j + 1)(dj + 2), and this proves statement (b).
By interchanging j and −j this provides also the proof of the statement in (d).
(cid:3)
The extremal secant locus. Now, we consider the (special) secant locus of a surface
of type I. We first give the following auxiliary result, which shall be of use for us again
later.
4.4. Lemma. Let s > 1, let C ⊂ Ps be a closed subscheme of dimension 1 and degree d
and let H = Ps−1 ⊂ Ps be a hyperplane. Then
length(C ∩ H) ≥ d with equality if and only if AssC(OC) ∩ H = ∅.
Proof. Let R = k ⊕ R1 ⊕ R2 ⊕ . . . = k[R1] be the homogeneous coordinate ring of C and let
f ∈ R1 be such that C ∩ H = Proj(R/f R). Let HR(t) = dt + c be the Hilbert polynomial
of R. Then, the two exact sequences
0 → f R → R → R/f R → 0 and 0 → (0 :R f )(−1) → R(−1) → f R → 0
yield that the Hilbert polynomial of R/f R is given by
HR/f R(t) = d + H(0:Rf )(t − 1).
16
MARKUS BRODMANN, WANSEOK LEE, EUISUNG PARK, PETER SCHENZEL
Observe that the polynomial H(0:Rf )(t − 1) vanishes if and only if (0 :R f )t = 0 for all
t ≫ 0, hence if and only if
f /∈
[p∈Ass(R)\{R+}
p.
But this latter condition is equivalent to the requirement that Ass(C) ∩ H = ∅.
4.5. Proposition. Let X ⊂ P5 be a surface of maximal sectional regularity of degree d > 5
which is of type I. Then, in the notations of Convention and Remark 4.1 we have:
(cid:3)
(a) F+(X) = F(X) = W = S(1, 1, 1).
(b) ∗Σ(X) = Σ(X).
(c) The image ψ(cid:0)Σ(X)(cid:1) of Σ(X) under the Plucker embedding ψ : G(1, P5) → P14 is
a Veronese surface in a subspace P5 ⊂ P14.
Proof. Statement (a) is a restatement of Notation and Remark 2.11 (C)(a).
(b), (c): We identify S(1, 1, 1) = W with the image of the Segre embedding σ : P1 × P2 →
P5. Consider the canonical projection
ϕ : P1 × P2 ։ P1 and its restriction ϕ ↾: X ։ P1.
Let
Θ := {P1 × {q} q ∈ P2} ⊂ G(1, P5)
denote the closed subset of all fibers under the canonical projection P1 × P2 ։ P2, hence
the set of all line sections of ϕ.
Fix a closed point p ∈ P1. Then, the fiber ϕ−1(p) = {p} × P2 =: P2
p is a ruling plane
of W . As X is smooth (see Corollary 2.3) and hence locally Cohen-Macaulay, the fiber
(ϕ ↾)−1(p) = X ∩ ϕ−1(p) = X ∩ P2
p is of pure dimension 1 and has no closed associated
points. Therefore length(X ∩ L) = deg(X ∩ P2
p not contained in X
(see Lemma 4.4). Consequently, if P2
p would contain a proper extremal secant line to X,
the curve X ∩ P2
p would be pure and of degree d − 2, so that X would be of type
II. This contradiction shows, that no proper extremal secant line to X is contained in a
ruling plane P2
p. Hence each proper secant line to X must be a line section of W .
As Θ ⊂ G(1, P5) is closed, it follows that ∗Σ(X) ⊆ Σ(X) ⊆ Θ, so that finally ψ(cid:0)∗Σ(X)(cid:1) ⊆
ψ(cid:0)Σ(X)) ⊆ ψ(Θ). Standard arguments on Plucker embeddings show that ψ(Θ) is the
Veronese surface in some subspace P5 ⊂ P14. As ∗Σ(X) is of dimension 2 (see Proposi-
tion 2.12), as ψ(Θ) is irreducible and as ψ is a closed embedding, statements (c) and (b)
follow.
(cid:3)
p) for all lines L ⊂ P2
p ⊂ P2
5. Surfaces of Type II
The cohomological aspect. In this section, we investigate the surfaces of maximal
sectional regularity which fall under type II. For the whole section we make the following
convention.
5.1. Convention and Notation. Let 5 ≤ r < d and let X ⊂ Pr be a surface of degree d
and of maximal sectional regularity of type II which is not a cone. Set Y := X ∪ F, where
F = F(X) = P2 denotes the extremal plane of X. Moreover, let I and L respectively
denote the homogeneous vanishing ideal of X and of F in S = k[x0, x1, . . . , xr].
ON SURFACES OF MAXIMAL SECTIONAL REGULARITY
17
5.2. Theorem. Let the notations and hypotheses be as in Convention and Notation 5.1.
Then the following statements hold
(a) (1) reg(X) = d − r + 3 and e(X) ≥(cid:0)d−r+2
2 (cid:1).
(2) h1(Pr, IX(j)) = 0 for all j ≤ 1. In particular X is linearly normal.
(3) h2(Pr, IX(j))
= e(X)
= e(X) + r − d − 1
≤ max{0, h2(Pr, IX (j − 1)) − 1}
= 1
= 0
for all j ≤ 0;
for j = 1;
for all j > 1;
for j = d − r;
for all j ≥ d − r + 1.
2
,
0,
(b) (1) reg(Y ) ≤ d − r + 3.
if j ≤ −2,
if j ≥ −1.
(4) h3(Pr, IX(j)) =( (j+1)(dj+2)
(3) h2(Pr, IY (j)) = h2(Pr, IX(j)) − max{0,(cid:0)−j+d−r+2
lar h2(Pr, IY (1)) = e(X) −(cid:0)d−r+2
∗ (Pr, IY ) ∼= H 1
∗ (Pr, IX).
(2) H 1
2
(cid:1)} for all j ≥ 0. In particu-
2 (cid:1) and h2(Pr, IY (d − r)) = 0.
(4) h2(Pr, IY (j)) ≥ h2(Pr, IY (j − 1)) for all j ≤ 1, with equality for j = 1.
(5) h2(Pr, IY (j)) ≤ max{0, h2(Pr, IY (j − 1)) − 1} for all j > 1.
(6) h3(Pr, IY (j)) = 0 for all j ≥ 0.
(7) If h2(Pr, IY ) = 0, then h2(Pr, IY (j)) = 0 for all j ∈ Z.
(1) τ (X) = (2, 3) if r + 1 ≤ d ≤ 2r − 4;
(2) τ (X) ∈ {(1, 1), (2, 2), (2, 3)} if 2r − 3 ≤ d ≤ 3r − 7;
(3) τ (X) ∈ {(1, 1), (2, 2)} if 3r − 6 ≤ d.
(c) For the pair τ (X) :=(cid:0) depth(X), depth(Y )(cid:1) we have
(d) h0(Pr, IX(2)) ≥(cid:0)r
2(cid:1) − d − 1 with equality if and only if τ (X) = (2, 3).
(cid:0)hi(Pr, IY (j))(cid:1)i=1,2,3 and j∈Z
(cid:0)hi(Pr, IX(j))(cid:1)i=1,2,3 and j∈Z,
of the sheaves of vanishing ideals IX , IY ⊂ OPr of X and Y .
As an immediate application, we get the following information on the cohomology tables
5.3. Corollary. Let X and Y be as above. Then the ideal sheaves IX , IY ⊂ OPr of X and
Y have the following cohomology tables:
2 · · · κ − 1 κ κ + 1 κ + 2 · · ·
· · · −2 −1 0
· · ·
· · ·
∗ · · ·
0
e e −κ − 1 ∗ · · ·
· · ·
· · ·
· · ·
0 · · ·
· · ·
0
∗
1
0
∗
0
0
∗
∗
0
0
e
∗
0
0
0
0
e
0
1
0
0
· · · −2 −1 0
· · ·
0
· · ·
· · ·
0
e
∗
0
e
∗
0
1
0
2 · · · κ − 1 κ κ + 1 κ + 2 · · ·
∗ · · ·
· · ·
· · ·
· · ·
∗
0
0
∗
∗
0
∗
0
0
0
0
0
e e −(cid:0)d−r+2
2 (cid:1) ∗ · · ·
0 · · ·
0
where κ := d − r, e := e(X) and ∗ stands for non-specified non-negative integers.
j
h1(Pr, IX (j))
h2(Pr, IX (j))
h3(Pr, IX (j))
and
j
h1(Pr, IY (j))
h2(Pr, IY (j))
h3(Pr, IY (j))
18
MARKUS BRODMANN, WANSEOK LEE, EUISUNG PARK, PETER SCHENZEL
An auxiliary result. Before we establish Theorem 5.2 we prove the following Lemma.
5.4. Lemma. Let the notations and hypotheses be as in Convention and Notation 5.1. In
addition let C := X ∩ F. Then the following statements hold.
(a) Each line L ⊂ F which is not contained in X, satisfies
length(C ∩ L) = length(X ∩ L) = d − r + 3.
In particular, C ⊂ F is a curve of degree d − r + 2 and has no closed associated
points.
(b) Id−r+3 \ I ∩ L 6= ∅ and for each f ∈ Id−r+3 \ I ∩ L it holds I = (I ∩ L, f )
Proof. (a): First let h ∈ U(X). Then Lh ⊂ F and
length(C ∩ Lh) = length(X ∩ Lh) = length(Ch ∩ Lh) = d − r + 3.
This shows, that C ⊂ F is a closed subscheme of dimension 1 and degree d − r + 3. Now,
let L ⊂ F be an arbitrary line which is not contained in X. As C ⊂ F is of dimension
1 and of degree d − r + 3 we have length(X ∩ L) = length(C ∩ L) ≥ d − r + 3. As
reg(X) ≤ d − r + 3 (see Theorem 3.4 (a)) we also have length(X ∩ L) ≤ d − r + 3, so that
indeed length(X ∩ L) = d − r + 3. Now, it follows by Lemma 4.4 that C has no closed
associated point.
(b): According to statement (a), there is a homogeneous polynomial g ∈ Sd−r+3 \ L such
that the homogeneous vanishing ideal (I + L)sat ⊂ S of C in S can be written as (L, g).
In particular we have I≤d−r+2 ⊂ L. As reg(X) = d − r + 3, the ideal I ⊂ S is generated
by homogeneous polynomials of degree ≤ d − r + 3. As g /∈ L it follows that Id−r+3 is
not contained in L and hence that I + L = (L, f ) for all f ∈ Id−r+3 \ I ∩ L. Therefore
I = I ∩ (I + L) = I ∩ (L, f ) = (I ∩ L, f ) for all such f .
(cid:3)
Proof of Theorem 5.2. (a)(1): Since X admits (d−r+3)-secant lines, we have reg(X) ≥
d − r + 3. On the other hand, reg(X) ≤ d − r + 3 by Theorem 3.4 (a). This proves the
stated equality for the regularity. For the moment, we postpone the proof of the stated
estimate for the invariant e(X).
(a)(2): It is obvious that h1(Pr, IX (j)) = 0 for all j ≤ 0. Assume h1(Pr, IX(1)) > 0.
Then X is a regular projection of a surface X ′ ⊂ Pr+1. Note that X ′ is again a sectionally
smooth rational surface and hence reg(X ′) ≤ d − r + 2 by Theorem 3.4(a). On the other
hand, the preimage C′ of C = X ∩ F under this regular projection is a plane curve of
degree (d − r + 3), and hence reg(X ′) ≥ d − r + 3. This contradiction proves our claim.
(a)(4): See Theorem 3.4(e)
(b)(4) and (b)(6): Let h ∈ U(X) and consider the induced exact sequence
0 → IY (−1) → IY → ICh∪Lh → 0
Keep in mind that H 1(Pr, ICh∪Lh(j)) = 0 for all j ≤ 1 and H 2(Pr, ICh∪Lh(j)) = 0 for all
j ≥ 1 by [BS2, Proposition 2.7(c),(d)]. Both claims now follow easily.
(b)(5): Assume again that h ∈ U(X) and keep in mind that S/(I ∩ L, h)sat is the homo-
geneous coordinate ring of Ch ∪ Lh in S. By [BS2, Remark 3.2 B)] the graded S-module
H 1(S/(I ∩ L, h)sat) =Mj∈Z
H 1(Pr, ICh∪Lh(j))
ON SURFACES OF MAXIMAL SECTIONAL REGULARITY
19
is generated by homogeneous elements of degree 2. Now, the induced exact sequences of
local cohomology modules
H 1(S/(I ∩ L, h)sat) −→ H 2(S/I ∩ L)(−1) ×h−→ H 2(S/I ∩ L) −→ H 2(S/(I ∩ L, h)sat)
proves claim (b)(5), since the multiplication map ·h is an epimorphism in all positive
degrees and its kernel is generated by homogeneous elements of degree 2.
(b)(7): This is an immediate consequence of (b)(4) and (b)(5).
(b)(2): Keep in mind that
H i
∗(Pr, IX ) ∼= H i(S/I) and H i
∗(Pr, IY ) ∼= H i(S/I ∩ L) for i = 1, 2, 3.
According to Lemma 5.4(b) we have an exact sequence
0 → (S/L)(−d + r − 3) → S/I ∩ L → S/I → 0.
Claim (b)(2) now follows immediately, since H i((S/L)(−d + r − 3)) vanishes for i = 1, 2.
(a)(3): For all j 6= d − r the values of h2(Pr, IX(j)) are as requested by statement (a)(2)
and by Theorem 3.4 (d). Observe that h2(Pr, IX(d − r)) ≤ 1 by Theorem 3.4 (d). So, it
remains to show that H 2(Pr, IX(d − r)) 6= 0. This follows from the exact sequence
H 2(S/I)d−r −→ H 3(S/L)−3
∼= k −→ H 3(S/I ∩ L)d−r = 0.
(b)(3):The first part of this claim follows immediately by (b)(6) and the exact sequence
used in the proof of (b)(2). Now, the second part of (b)(3) comes immediately from (a)(3).
(b)(1): The required vanishing conditions
hi(Pr, IY (d − r + 3 − i + k)) = 0 for i = 1, 2, 3 and all k ≥ 0
are obtained respectively by (a)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3) and (b)(6).
Finally, the inequality for e(X) stated in (a)(1), follows from (b)(3) applied with j = 1.
(c): By (a)(3), we know that depth(X) ≤ 2. Also (b)(2) implies that, if depth(X) = 1
then depth(Y ) = 1 and, if depth(X) = 2 then depth(Y ) = 2 or 3. Thus we need only to
show (c)(1) and (c)(3). If d ≤ 2r − 4 = 2(r − 1) − 2, then Ch ∪ Lh is arithmetically Cohen-
Macaulay by [BS2, Proposition 3.5]. Thus we have depth(Y ) = 3 and hence depth(X) = 2.
On the other hand, if d ≥ 3r − 6, then depth(Ch ∪ Lh) = 1 by Proposition 2.5 and hence
depth(Y ) ≤ 2. Therefore either τ (X) = (1, 1) or τ (X) = (2, 2).
(d): Since X is linearly normal we have h0(Pr, IX(2)) = h0(Pr−1, ICh(2)). Moreover, by
[BS2, Proposition 3.6], we have
h0(Pr−1, ICh(2)) ≥(cid:18)r
2(cid:19) − d − 1
where equality holds if and only if Ch ∪ Lh is arithmetically Cohen-Macaulay, or equiv-
alently, if and only if depth(Y ) = 3. Finally, we know by (c) that depth(Y ) = 3 if and
only if τ (X) = (2, 3). This completes the proof.
(cid:3)
Simplicity of the socle of the second cohomology. As a first application and ex-
tension of Theorem 5.2 we show that (in the previous notation) the vanishing condi-
tion h2(Pr, IY ) = 0 which occurs in statement (b)(7) of that Theorem is equivalent
∗ (Pr, IX) =
to the simplicity of the socle of the second total cohomology module H 2
Lj∈Z H 2(Pr, IX(j)) of IX. To formulate our result, we recall the following notation.
(ii) h2(Pr, IY ) = 0.
(iii) h2(Pr, IY (j)) = 0 for all j ∈ {0, 1, 2, . . . , d − r − 1}.
(iv) h2(Pr, IY (j)) = 0 for all j ∈ Z.
(i) e(X) takes its minimally possible value(cid:0)d−r+2
2 (cid:1).
(v) h2(Pr, IX(j)) =(cid:0)−j+d−r+2
(vi) h2(Pr, IX(j)) = max{0,(cid:0)−j+d−r+2
∗ (Pr, IX))(cid:1) = 1.
(vii) dimk(cid:0)Soc(H 2
(cid:1)} for all j ≥ 0.
(cid:1) for all j ∈ {0, 1, 2, . . . , d − r}.
2
2
Proof. Indeed, the equivalences (i) ⇔ (ii) ⇔ (iii) ⇔ (iv) ⇔ (v) ⇔ (vi) follow by Theo-
rem 5.2. It remains to show the equivalence (iv) ⇔ (vii). Consider the exact sequence of
graded S-modules
0 −→ H 2
∗ (Pr, IY ) −→ H 2
∗ (Pr, IY ) −→ H 3
∗ (Pr, IF(−d + r − 3)).
As
Soc(cid:0)H 3
∗ (Pr, IF(−d + r − 3))(cid:1) = k(d − r),
h2(Pr, IY (j)) = 0 for all j ≥ d − r, and
h2(Pr, IX(j)) = 0 for all j ≥ d − r + 1
we get an isomorphism of graded S-modules
20
MARKUS BRODMANN, WANSEOK LEE, EUISUNG PARK, PETER SCHENZEL
5.5. Notation and Reminder. Let T = Ln∈Z Tn be a graded S-module. Then, we
denote the socle of T by Soc(T ), thus:
Soc(T ) := (0 :T S+) ∼= HomS(k, T ) = HomS(S/S+, T ).
Keep in mind that the socle of a graded Artinian S-module T is a k-vector space of finite
dimension which vanishes if and only if T does.
5.6. Proposition. Let the notations and hypotheses be as in Convention and Notation 5.1.
Then following statements are equivalent:
From this isomorphism, we see that
Soc(cid:0)H 2
∗ (Pr, IY )(cid:1) ∼= Soc(cid:0)H 2
∗ (Pr, IY ) = 0 if and only if Soc(cid:0)H 2
∗ (Pr, IX)(cid:1)≤d−r−1.
∗ (Pr, IX)(cid:1)≤d−r−1 = 0.
H 2
By Theorem 5.2 (b)(7) the module H 2
h2(Pr, IY ) does. So, condition (iv) holds,
trated in degrees ≥ d − r. By Theorem 5.2 (a)(4) this is the case if and only if condition
(vii) holds.
(cid:3)
if and only if Soc(cid:0)H 2
∗ (Pr, IX)(cid:1) is concen-
∗ (Pr, IY ) vanishes if and only if the number
5.7. Remark. (A) If the above equivalent conditions (i) -- (vii) hold, we must have
τ (X) ∈ {(1, 1), (2, 3)}.
Moreover τ (X) = (2, 3) implies the above equivalent conditions (i) -- (vii).
(B) Observe, that the above minimality condition (i) describes a generic situation. So,
∗ (Pr, IX ) occurs in the generic situ-
it is noteworthy that the simplicity of the socle of H 2
ation, too. Below, we shall see, that in such a generic situation, a number of additional
conclusions may be drawn.
ON SURFACES OF MAXIMAL SECTIONAL REGULARITY
21
5.8. Corollary. Let the notations and hypotheses be as in Convention and Notation 5.1.
Then, the following statements hold:
(b) If the equivalent conditions (i)-(vii) of Proposition 5.6 hold, the S-module H 1
∗ (Pr, IX)
(a) h1(Pr, IX(2)) ≤ h0(Pr, IX(2)) −(cid:0)r
2(cid:1) + d + 1.
is minimally generated by h0(Pr, IX (2)) −(cid:0)r
degree 2.
2(cid:1) + d + 1 homogeneous elements of
Proof. In view of Theorem 5.2(b)(2) we may replace X by Y . We choose h ∈ U(X) and
apply cohomolgy to the induced exact sequence of sheaves
in order to end up with an exact secuence of graded S-modules
0 → IY (−1) h→ IY → ICh∪Lh → 0
∗ (Pr, IY ) → H 1
(a): By Proposition 3.6 of [BS2], the S-module H 1
∗ (Pr, IY )/hH 1
0 → H 1
∗ (Hh, ICh∪Lh) → H 2
∗ (Hh, ICh∪Lh) is minimally generated by
∗ (Pr, IY )
h0(Hh, ICh(2)) −(cid:18)r
2(cid:19) + d + 1
homogeneous elements of degree 2. As X is linearly normal, we have h0(Hh, ICh(2)) =
h0(Pr, IX (2)). Now, our claim follows immediately.
(b): By our hypothesis, the third module in the above sequence vanishes. Now, we get
our claim by Nakayama.
(cid:3)
5.9. Corollary. Let the notations and hypotheses be as in Convention and Notation 5.1.
Then, the following statements hold:
(a) For all j ∈ N0 we have
h0(X, OX (j)) = d(cid:18)j + 1
2 (cid:19) + j + 1 + h2(Pr, IX(j)) − e(X).
(b) If the equivalent conditions (i)-(vii) of Proposition 5.6 hold, then
h0(X, OX (j)) =
eX ⊂ Pd+1 of X, let D := DA+(A) = Γ∗(X, OX) be the A+-transform of A and consider
the short exaxt sequence 0 → D → B → C → 0 in which C is a one-dimensional
Cohen-Macaulay module of dimension 1 with
2 (cid:1) + j + 1 +(cid:0)d−r+2−j
d(cid:0)j+1
d(cid:0)j+1
2 (cid:1) + j + 1 −(cid:0)d−r+2
2 (cid:1)
Proof. (a): Once more, let B be the homogeneous coordinate ring of the projecting scroll
(cid:1) −(cid:0)d−r+2
2 (cid:1)
for 0 ≤ j ≤ d − r,
for d − r < j.
2
As
dimk(Cj) = e(X) − h2(Pr, IX(j)) for all j ∈ Z.
dimk(Bj) = χ(O eX (j)) = d(cid:18)j + 1
2 (cid:19) + j + 1 for all j ∈ N0,
we get our claim.
(b): This follows immediately from statement (a) bearing in mind the values of e(X) and
of h2(Pr, IX (j)) imposed by the conditions (i) and (vi) of Proposition 5.6.
(cid:3)
22
MARKUS BRODMANN, WANSEOK LEE, EUISUNG PARK, PETER SCHENZEL
The second deficiency module. We first remind the notion of deficiency module.
5.10. Reminder. Let A be the homogeneous coordinate ring of the surface X ⊂ Pr, let
M be a finitely generated graded A-module and let i ∈ N0. Then, the i-th deficiency
module of M is defined by
K i(M) := Extr−i+1
S
(M, S(−r − 1)) ∼= H i(M)∨,
where •∨ := ∗Homk(•, k) denotes the (contravariant exact) graded Matlis duality functor.
The module K dim(M )(M) is called the canonical module of M.
In this subsection, we are interested in the second deficiency module
K 2(A) = Extr−1
S (A, S(−r − 1)) = H 2(A)∨
of the coordinate ring A of X and its induced sheaf
X := ^K 2(A).
K2
5.11. Proposition. Let the notations and hypotheses be as in Convention and Nota-
tion 5.1. Let π = πΛ : eX ։ X be the standard normalization of X. Let B be the
homogeneous coordinate ring of the projecting scroll eX ⊂ Pd+1, let D := DA+(A) =
Γ∗(X, OX )(⊆ B) and set F := π∗(O eX)/OX = ]B/D. Then, the following statements hold:
(a) K 2(A) ∼= K 1(B/D) is a Cohen-Macaulay module of dimension one, and
(1) reg(K 2(A)) = 0;
∼= ^Γ∗(X, F )∨.
(2) K2
X
(b) For each closed point x ∈ X, the stalk K2
X,x of K2
X at x coincides with the first
(OX,x, OPr,x) of the local ring OX,x of X at
deficiency module K 1(OX,x) = Extr−1
OX,x
x. In particular
(1) lengthOX,x(K2
(2) Supp(K2
(3) lengthOX (K2
X) = Sing(X);
X) = e(X).
X,x) = ex(X) for all closed points x ∈ X;
(c) If the equivalent conditions of Proposition 5.6 hold, then K 2(A) ∼= S/J(d − r),
where J ⊂ S is a saturated graded ideal such that:
(1) I + L ⊂ J;
(2) reg(J) = d − r + 1;
(3) J is minimally generated by L and d − r + 2 forms of degree d − r + 1.
(d) If the equivalent conditions of Proposition 5.6 do not hold, then the S-module
K 2(A) is minimally generated by one element of degree r − d and some additional
elements of degrees > r − d.
Proof. (a): Let C := B/D. As seen in the proof of Theorem 3.4 (d) we have
H 2(A) ∼= H 2(D) ∼= H 1(C), ^DA+(C) ∼= eC ∼= F and DA+(C) ∼= Γ∗(X, F ).
Applying the functor •∨ to the first isomorphism, we get K 2(A) ∼= K 1(C) = K 1(B/A).
As C is a Cohen-Macaulay module of dimension 1, so is its canonical module K 1(C).
ON SURFACES OF MAXIMAL SECTIONAL REGULARITY
23
To prove claim (1), keep in mind that K 2(A) is a Cohen-Macaulay module of dimension
1, so that indeed
reg(K 2(A)) = end(cid:0)H1(K 2(A))(cid:1) + 1 = sup{j ∈ Z dimk(K 2(A)j−1) < dimk(K 2(A)j)} + 1
= sup{j ∈ Z dimk(H 2(A)−j+1) < dimk(H 2(A)−j)} + 1 = −1 + 1 = 0.
To prove claim (2), we apply the Matlis duality functor •∨ to the short exact sequence
0 → C → DA+(C) → H 2(A) → 0 and get an exact sequence of graded A-modules
0 −→ K 2(A) −→ DA+(C)∨ −→ C ∨ −→ 0. As fC ∨ = 0, we obtain K2
(b): The standard isomorphism ^Extr−1
requested isomorphism K2
local duality implies that
OX,x(OX,x, OPr,x) implies the
∼= K 1(OX,x). As taking local Matlis duals preserve lengths,
S (A, S(−r − 1))x
∼= Extr−1
∼= ^Γ∗(X, F )∨.
X,x
X
ex(X) = length(cid:0)H 1
mX,x(OX,x)(cid:1) = length(cid:0)K 1(OX,x)(cid:1),
and this implies claim (1). Now, claims (2) and (3) are immediate.
(c): As H 2(A) ∼= H 2
∗ (Pr, IX ) our hypotheses imply that Soc(H 2(A)) = H 2(A)d−r
and hence the standard isomorphism Soc(cid:0)H 2(A)(cid:1)∨ ∼= H 2(A)∨ ⊗A k shows that K 2(A)
is generated by one single element of degree r − d. Therefore K 2(A) ∼= S/J(d − r) for
some homogeneous ideal J ⊂ S. By statement (a), this ideal J is saturated.
If we
apply cohomology to the exact sequence 0 → S/I ∩ L → S/I ⊕ S/L → S/(I + L) → 0
∗ (Pr, IX∪F(X)) = 0, we get a monomorphism
and keep in mind, that H 2(S/I ∩ L) = H 2
H 2(A) → H 2(S/(I + L)). Therefore (I + L)K 2(A) = 0 and hence I + L ⊆ J. As K 2(A)
is of dimension 1, the inclusion is strict. This proves claim (1).
According to Statement (a)(1) we have reg(J) = reg(S/J) + 1 = reg(K 2(A)(r − d)) + 1 =
reg(K 2(A)) + d − r + 1 = d − r + 1, and this proves claim (2).
Moreover, in view of condition (v) of Proposition 5.6 we have
∼= k,
dimk(S/J)k = dimk(cid:0)H 2(A)r−d+k(cid:1) =(cid:18)min{k, d − r} + 2
2
(cid:19) for all k ∈ N0,
so that
dimk(cid:0)(S/J)k(cid:1) = dimk(cid:0)(S/L)k(cid:1) for all k ≤ d − r and
dimk(cid:0)(S/J)d−r+1(cid:1) = dimk(cid:0)(S/L)d−r+1(cid:1) − (d − r + 2).
In view of claims (1) and (2) this proves claim (3).
(d): If the equivalent conditions of Proposition 5.6 do not hold, then dimk(cid:0)Soc(H 2(A))j(cid:1)
Soc(cid:0)H 2(A)(cid:1)∨ ∼= H 2(A)∨ ⊗A k.
vanishes for all j > d − r, takes the value 1 for j = d − r and does not vanish for
some j < d − r (see Theorem 5.2 (a)(3)). Now, we get our claim by the isomorphism
(cid:3)
5.12. Remark. Observe that the previous proposition generalizes Theorem 3.6 (e) of
[BS4].
24
MARKUS BRODMANN, WANSEOK LEE, EUISUNG PARK, PETER SCHENZEL
An application in higher dimensions. We now draw a conclusion for higher dimen-
sional varieties of maximal sectional regularity.
5.13. Corollary. Let n ≥ 2 and let X ⊂ Pr be an n-dimensional variety of maximal
sectional regularity of degree d and of type II. Then X is linearly normal and we have
h0(Pr, IX(2)) ≥(cid:18)r − n + 1
2
(cid:19) − d − 1
with equality if and only if X ∪ F(X) is arithmetically Cohen-Macaulay. Moreover, if
equality is attained, then depth(X) = n.
Proof. For n = 2, our claim follows by Theorem 5.2 (a)(2) and (d).
So let n > 2. Note that a general hyperplane section X ′ = X ∩ H ⊂ H, (H = Pr−1) of
X is again a variety of maximal sectional regularity and of degree d of type II. So, by
induction and on use of the exact sequence
0 −→ IX (−1) −→ IX −→ IX ′ −→ 0
2
it first follows that h1(Pr, IX(1)) = 0 and then that h0(Pr, IX(2)) = h0(H, IX ′(2)) ≥
(cid:1) − d − 1. So, X is linearly normal and satisfies the requested inequality.
(cid:0)r−n+1
As F(X ′) = F(X∩H) = F(X)∩H (see [BLPS1, Lemma 5.1 (a)]), we have(cid:0)X∪F(X)(cid:1)∩H =
X ′ ∪ F(X ′). So,(cid:0)X ∪ F(X)(cid:1) ∩ H is arithmetically Cohen-Macaulay if and only X ′ ∪ F(X ′)
is. Therefore, again by induction, equality holds if and only if X ∪ F(X) is arithmetically
Cohen-Macaulay.
Finally, by [BLPS1, Theorem 7.1] we know that X ∩ F ⊂ F is a hypersurface. Therefore
depth(X) = n if X ∪ F(X) is arithmetically Cohen-Macaulay.
(cid:3)
Comparing Betti numbers. We finish this section with a comparison of the Betti
numbers of X and Y = X ∪ F(X).
5.14. Proposition. Let the notations and hypotheses be as in Convention and Nota-
tion 5.1 and assume that X is not a cone. Set m := reg(Y ). Then the following statements
hold:
(a) For all i ≥ 1 we have
βi,j(X) =
βi,j(Y )
βi,j(Y ) = 0
i−1(cid:1)
βi,d−r+2(Y ) +(cid:0)r−2
for 1 ≤ j ≤ m − 1,
for m ≤ j ≤ d − r + 1,
for j = d − r + 2.
(b) m ≤ d − r + 2 if and only if βi,d−r+2(X) =(cid:0)r−2
i−1(cid:1) for all i ≥ 1.
Proof. Let I and L respectively denote the homogeneous vanishing ideals of X and F(X)
in S = k[x0, x1, . . . , xr], so that βi,j(X) = βi,j(S/I) and βi,j(Y ) = βi,j(S/I ∩ L) for all
i, j ∈ N.
(a): The exact sequence
0 → (S/L)(−d + r − 3) → S/I ∩ L → S/I → 0
used in the proof of Theorem 5.2 induces the following long exact sequence:
i (k, S/I)i+j
i (k, S/L)i+j−d+r−3 → TorS
i (k, S/I ∩ L)i+j → TorS
TorS
ON SURFACES OF MAXIMAL SECTIONAL REGULARITY
25
→ TorS
i−1(k, S/L)(i−1)+j−d+r−2 → TorS
i−1(k, S/I ∩ L)(i−1)+j+1
For all non-negative integers k we have
dimK(cid:0) TorS
k (k, S/L)k+l(cid:1) = βk,l(S/L) =(0
(cid:0)r−2
k (cid:1)
if l 6= 0
if l = 0
Therefore, the above long exact sequence makes us end up with isomorphisms
TorS
i (k, S/I ∩ L)i+j
∼= TorS
i (k, S/I)i+j for all i ≥ 1 and all j ∈ {1, 2, . . . , d − r + 1}.
As reg(S/I ∩ L) = reg(Y ) − 1 = m − 1, we have βi,j(S/I ∩ L) = 0 for all i ≥ 1 and all j ≥
m. So by the above isomorphisms we get the requested values of βi,j(S/I) for all i ≥ 1
and all j ∈ {1, . . . , d − r + 1}.
As reg(S/I ∩ L) = reg(Y ) − 1 ≤ d − r + 2 (see Theorem 5.2(b)(1)), the last module in
the above exact sequences vanishes for j = d − r + 2. So, our previous observation on the
Betti numbers βk,l(S/L) yields a short exact sequence
0 → TorS
i (k, S/I ∩ L)i+d−r+2 → TorS
i (k, S/I)i+d−r+2 → k(r−2
i−1) → 0 for all i ≥ 1,
(b): As already said above, we have m ≤ d − r + 3 and hence βi,j(Y ) = 0 for all i ≥ 1
and all j ≥ d − r + 3. Thus m ≤ d − r + 2 if and only if βi,d−r+2(Y ) = 0 for all i ≥ 1.
which shows that βi,d−r+2(S/I) = βi,d−r+2(S/I ∩ L) +(cid:0)r−2
i−1(cid:1), and this proves our claim.
i−1(cid:1) for
Also by statement (a), the second condition holds if and only if βi,d−r+2(X) =(cid:0)r−2
all i ≥ 1.
(cid:3)
Special extremal secant lines. In case of surfaces of type II, the special extremal
secant locus is easily understood. We also shall see that proper 3-secant lines which meet
X only in regular points are already special extremal lines and we shall approximate the
singular locus of X by the singular locus of the intersection of X with the extremal F(X)
plane of X.
5.15. Proposition. Let the hypotheses be as in Convention and Notation 5.1. Then the
following statements hold:
(a) The image ψ(cid:0)∗Σ(X)(cid:1) of the special extremal locus ∗Σ(X) of X under the Plucker
embedding
ψ : G(1, Pr(cid:1) −→ P(r+1
2 )−1
is a plane.
(b) Let L ∈ G(1, Pr) such that L * X. Then, the following statements are equivalent:
(i) L ∈ ∗Σ(X);
(ii) length(X ∩ L) ≥ 3 and X ∩ L ⊂ Reg(X).
X.
(c) Sing(X) = {x ∈ Sing(cid:0)X ∩ F(X)(cid:1) F(X) ( Tx(X)}. In particular, each point
x ∈ Sing(cid:0)X ∩ F(X)(cid:1) not contained in a line L ⊂ X ∩ F(X) is a singular point of
Proof. (a): As X is of type II, we know thatSL∈∗Σ(X) L = F(X) = P2 ⊂ Pr is a plane, so
that ψ(cid:0)G(1, P2)(cid:1) is a plane in P(r+1
(b): The implication "(i) ⇐ (ii)" follows as CH := X ∩ H is smooth for each H ∈ U(X)
that ∗Σ(X) = G(1, F(X)) = G(1, P2). Standard arguments on Plucker embeddings show
2 )−1.
26
MARKUS BRODMANN, WANSEOK LEE, EUISUNG PARK, PETER SCHENZEL
and hence can only contain smooth points of X.
So, let L ∈ Σ3(X) such that X ∩ L is finite and contained in Reg(X), and assume that
Λ : Pd+1 ։ Pr,
standard normalization of X, induced by the linear projection π′ = π′
consider the closed preimage L′ := π′−1(L) ∈ G(d − r + 2, Pd+1), of L and observe that
LH 6= L for all H ∈ U(X). We aim for a contradiction. Let π = πΛ : eX ։ X be the
eX ∩L′ = π−1(X ∩L) is finite. Let H′ ∈ G(d, Pd+1) be a general hyperplane which contains
the space L′. If eX is not a cone, we may conclude by [BP2, Remark 2.3 (B)], that the
intersection eX ∩ H′ ⊂ H′ is a rational normal curve. If eX is a cone, the fact that L avoids
the singular locus of X implies that L′ does not contain the vertex of eX and we end up
again with the conclusion that eX ∩ H′ ⊂ H′ is a rational normal curve. As H′ is general,
CH = X ∩ H = π(eX ∩ H′) ⊂ Pr is an integral curve, whence H ∈ U(X).
By our assumption we have L 6= LH, hence V := hLH, Li ∈ G(s, H) with s ∈ {2, 3}. In
particular, the intersection X ∩ V is finite. As L 6= LH, we have
the hyperplane H := π′(H′ \ Λ) ∈ G(r − 1, Pr) avoids the finite set Sing(π), and hence
length(X ∩ (L ∪ LH)) ≥ length(X ∩ L) + length(X ∩ LH) − ε
with ε = 1 if L ∩ LH ⊂ X and ε = 0 otherwise. In the first case, we have s = 2, so that
always 3 − ε ≥ s. Therefore, we obtain
length(X ∩(L∪LH)) ≥ length(X ∩L)+length(X ∩LH)−ε ≥ 3+d−r +3−ε ≥ d−r +s+3.
As L ∪ LH ⊂ Reg(X) ∩ V this contradicts Proposition 3.5 (b).
(c): Let x ∈ Sing(X). Let H ∈ U(X) such that LH ∩ Sing(X) = ∅ and consider the
plane EH := hx, LHi ⊂ Pr. Then, by Proposition 3.5 (c), we have dim(X ∩ EH) = 1. If
x /∈ F(X), this would imply the contradiction that the intersection of X with the three-
space hx, F(X)i contains infinitely many curves. Therefore x ∈ F(X).
Now, let L ⊂ F(X) be a general line such that x ∈ L. Then, by Lemma 5.4 (a) we have
Sing(X) ∩ L = {x} and length(X ∩ L) = d − r + 3. Assume, that multx(L ∩ X) = 1,
so that length(Reg(X) ∩ L) = length(X ∩ L) − 1 = d − r + 2. By Proposition 3.5 (b) it
follows that d − r + 4 = d − r + 2 + 2 ≤ d − r + 1 + 2 = d − r + 3, and this contradiction
shows that multx(L ∩ X) > 1. This first shows that L is a tangent line to X in x,
and hence proves that F(X) ⊆ Tx(X). As x ∈ Sing(X), the inclusion is strict. As
multx(cid:0)L ∩ (X ∩ F(X)(cid:1) = multx(L ∩ X) > 1 it also follows that a general line L ⊂ F(X)
which runs through x, is tangent to X ∩ F(X) in x, so that x ∈ Sing(cid:0)X ∩ F(X)(cid:1). This
proves the inclusion "⊆" between the two sets in question. As the converse inclusion is
obvious, we get the requested equality. The additional claim now follows easily, as X is a
union of lines.
(cid:3)
6. The index of normality of X
Index of normality and extremal planes. Our next main result is devoted to the
study of the relations among the index of normality N(X), the Betti numbers βi,j(X) and
the nature of the union X ∪ F(X), where X is a surface of maximal sectional regularity
which is of type II. We begin with two auxiliary results.
6.1. Lemma. Let the notations and hypotheses be as in Convention and Notation 5.1.
Assume that X is not a cone. Then we have the following statements
ON SURFACES OF MAXIMAL SECTIONAL REGULARITY
27
(a) Soc(H 1(S/I))(−r − 1) ∼= TorS
r (k, S/I).
(c) N(X) ≤ d − r if and only if βr,d−r+2(X) = 0.
(b) If depth(X) = 1, then H 1(cid:0)Pr, IX (N(X))(cid:1) ∼= TorS
DS+(S/I) =Ln∈Z H 0(Pr, OX (n)) of X, as well as the short exact sequence
If depth(X) > 1, both of the occurring modules vanish and our claim is
Proof. (a):
obvious. So, we assume that depth(X) = 1 and consider the total ring of sections D :=
0 −→ S/I −→ D −→ H 1(S/I) −→ 0.
r (k, S/I)N (X)+r+1.
We apply the Koszul functor K(x; •) with respect to x := x0, x1, . . . , xr to this sequence
and end up in homology with an exact sequence
Hr+1(x; D) → Hr+1(x; H 1(S/I)) → Hr(x; S/I) → Hr(x; D).
As depth(D) > 1 the first and the last module in this sequence vanish, so that
Hr+1(x; H 1(S/I)) ∼= Hr(x; S/I).
As the Koszul complex K(x, S) provides a free resolution of k = S/S+ and K(x; S/I) ∼=
K(x; S)⊗S S/I we have Hr(x; S/I) ∼= TorS
r (k, S/I). As the sequence x has length r+1, we
have Hr+1(x; H 1(S/I)) ∼= Soc(H 1(S/I))(−r−1). Altogether, we now obtain the requested
statement (a).
(b): As N(X) = end(H 1(S/I)), we have
H 1(cid:0)Pr, IX(N(X))(cid:1) ∼= H 1(S/I)N (X) = Soc(H 1(S/I))N (X).
Now, our claim follows immediately by statement (a).
(c): If depth(X) > 1 we have N(X) = −∞ and βr,d−r+2(X) = 0, so that our claim is true.
We thus may assume that depth(X) = 1. As reg(X) = d −r + 3 we have N(X) ≤ d −r + 1
and TorS
r (k, S/I)r+l = 0 for all l ≥ d −r + 3. Now, we may conclude by statement (b). (cid:3)
Now, we are ready to give the announced main result.
6.2. Theorem. Let the notations and hypotheses be as in Convention and Notation 5.1.
Assume that X is not a cone. Then
(a) The following statements are equivalent:
(i) N(X) ≤ d − r.
(ii) reg(X ∪ F(X)) ≤ d − r + 2.
(iii) βi,d−r+2(X) =(cid:0)r−2
(iv) βr,d−r+2(X) = 0.
i−1(cid:1) for all i ≥ 1.
(b) The following statements are equivalent:
(i) β1,d−r+2(X) = 1.
(ii) I ∩ L = (I≤d−r+2), where I and L are the homogeneous vanishing ideals of X
respectively of F(X) in S.
Proof. (a): (i) ⇒ (ii): Let N(X) ≤ d − r and I and L ⊂ S = k[x0, x1, . . . , xr] re-
spectively denote the homogeneous vanishing ideals of X and of F(X). According to
Theorem 5.2 (b)(1) we have end(H 1(S/I ∩ L) = end(H 1(S/I)) = N(X) ≤ d − r.
So, it follows by Theorem 5.2 (b)(3) and (6) that reg(S/I ∩ L) ≤ d − r + 1, whence
reg(X) ∪ F(X) = reg(I ∩ L) ≤ d − r + 2.
28
MARKUS BRODMANN, WANSEOK LEE, EUISUNG PARK, PETER SCHENZEL
(ii) ⇒ (i): As end(H 1(S/I)) = N(X), this is an easy consequence of Theorem 5.2 (b)(2).
(ii) ⇒ (iii): This follows by Propsition 5.14.
(iii) ⇒ (ii): Assume that statement (iii) holds. Then we have in particular that
β1,d−r+2(X) = 1. Now, we may again conclude by Proposition 5.14.
(iii) ⇔ (iv): This is clear by Lemma 6.1.
(b): (i) ⇒ (ii): Assume that β1,d−r+2(X) = 1. Then, it follows by Proposition 5.14 (a)
that (I≤d−r+2) = I ∩ L.
(ii)⇒(i): This also follows immediately by Proposition 5.14 (a).
(cid:3)
6.3. Remark. (A) The extremal plane F(X) of a surface X of type II which satisfies
N(X) ≤ d−r has some nice properties. We namely can say that the equivalent properties
(i),(ii) of Theorem 6.2 (b) imply the following statements, in which, for all m ∈ N, we use
Secm(X) :=
[
L∈G(1,Pr):length(X∩L)≥m
L
to denote the m-th secant variety of X.
(1) If L ∈ Σ(X), then L ⊂ X ∪ F(X),
(2) Secd−r+3(X) = X ∪ F(X),
(3) F+(X) = F(X).
Indeed, assume that the equivalent statements (i) and (ii) of Theorem 6.2(b) hold. Let
L ∈ G(1, Pr) such that d − r + 3 ≤ length(X ∩ L) < ∞. Let M ⊂ S be the homogeneous
vanishing ideal of L. Then, (Id−r+2) ⊂ M. As I ∩L = (I≤d−r+2) it follows that I ∩L ⊂ M.
As L is not contained in X, the ideal I is not contained in M. It follows that L ⊂ M, and
hence that L ⊂ F(X). As Σ(X) is the closure of all lines L as above, this proves claim
(1).
Claims (2) and (3) are immediate by claim (1), as F(X) is a union of lines and each line
L ⊂ Pr with length(X ∩ L) > d − r + 3 is contained in X.
(B) Observe that statement (iii) of Theorem 6.2 (a) implies that β1,d−r+2(X) = 1. So,
the equivalent statements (a) (i) -- (iv) imply the equivalent statements (b)(i) and (b)(ii)
of this theorem.
(C) We have seen above, that surfaces X of type II and sub-maximal index of normality
behave nicely. We therefore can expect, that in the extremal case N(X) = −∞ -- hence
in the case where depth(X) = 2 -- we get even more detailed information on the Betti
numbers if X is of "small degree".
Surfaces of degree r + 1 in Pr. We now briefly revisit the special case of surfaces
X ⊂ Pr of degree r + 1.
[B2], [BS4]) (A) Assume that r ≥ 5 and let our surface X ⊂ Pr be
6.4. Remark. (s.
of degree r + 1. Then, we can distinguish 9 cases, which show up by their numerical
invariants as presented in the following table. Here σ(X) denotes the sectional genus of
(h ∈ U(X))
X, that is the arithmetic genus of the generic hyperplane section curve Ch
or equivalently, the sectional genus of the polarized surface (X, OX (1)) in the sense of
Fujita [Fu]. Moreover sreg(X) denotes the sectional regularity introduced in Remark and
Definition 2.4.
ON SURFACES OF MAXIMAL SECTIONAL REGULARITY
29
Case sreg(X) depth(X) σ(X) e(X) h1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
1
0
3
0
A(2)
0
0
0
0
0
≤ 1
≤ 2
A(1) h1
0
0
0
1
0
1
2
0
2
0
3
The case 9 occurs only if r = 5. In [B2] and [BS4] we listed indeed two more cases 10 and
11, of which we did not know at that time, whether they might occur at all. For these
two cases we had sreg(X) = 4 = d − r + 3 and e(X) ∈ {1, 2}. As these surfaces would be
of maximal sectional regularity, this would contradict Theorem 4.3 (b) and Theorem 5.2
(a). So, surfaces which fall under the cases 10 and 11 cannot occur at all. In the case 9
we have e(X) = 0, and hence by Theorem 5.2 (b)(3) the surface X is of type I in this
case.
(B) The surfaces of types 8 and 9 are of particular interest, as they are the ones of maximal
sectional regularity within all the 9 listed types. Observe, that among all surfaces X of
degree r + 1 in Pr, those of type 8 are precisely the ones X which are of maximal sectional
regularity and of arithmetic depth ≥ 2. If r ≥ 6, the surfaces of type 8 are precisely the
ones which are of maximal sectional regularity.
(C) Observe, that in the cases 5 -- 9 we have σ(X) = 0. This means, that the surfaces
which fall under these 5 types are all sectionally rational and have finite non-normal locus.
So, by Theorem 4.1 in [BLPS1], these surfaces are almost non-singular projections of a
2 , even if they are
cones (see [BS3, Corollary 5.11] for the non-conic case). So, according to Theorem 2.9 (b)
the surfaces X of types 5 -- 9 all satisfy the Eisenbud-Goto inequality reg(X) ≤ 4, with
equality in the cases 8 and 9 (see Theorem 5.2 (a)(1) and Theorem 4.2 ). In the cases 1 -- 5,
the values of hi(Pr, IX(n)) =: hi(S/I)n
(i = 1, 2, n ∈ Z) (see [BS4, Reminder 2.2 (C) and
(D)]) show, that reg(X) = 3. In the case 6 we may have reg(X) = 3 whereas in the case 7,
we know even that reg(X) may take both values 3 and 4 (see [BS4, Example 3.5, Examples
3.4 (A),(B) and (C)]). This shows in particular, that there are sectionally rational surfaces
X ⊂ Pr of degree r + 1 with finite non-normal locus and sreg(X) < reg(X).
rational normal surface scroll eX = S(a, r + 1 − a) with 0 ≤ a ≤ r+1
6.5. Corollary. Assume that the surface X ⊂ Pr
statements are equivalent
K is of degree r + 1. Then, the following
(i) The surface X is of type 8.
(ii) e(X) = 3.
(iii) sreg(X) = 4 and depth(X) = 2.
(iv) sreg(X) = 4 and X does not fall under the case 9 of Remark 6.4.
Proof. This follows easily on use of the table in Remark 6.4 (A).
(cid:3)
30
MARKUS BRODMANN, WANSEOK LEE, EUISUNG PARK, PETER SCHENZEL
7. Examples and Problems
Surfaces of extremal regularity with small extremal secant locus. As announced
already in the Introduction, we now shall present a construction, which allows to provide
examples of surfaces of extremal regularity whose extremal secant variety is of dimension
−1, 0, or 1. These surfaces are in particular not of maximal sectional regularity. We
already have spelled out the meaning of such examples in relation what is said about
varieties of extremal regularity in [GruLPe].
7.1. Construction and Examples. Let a, b, d ∈ N with a ≤ b, let r := a + b + 3,
assume that d > r and consider the smooth threefold rational normal scroll of degree
a + b + 1 = r − 2
Z := S(1, a, b) ⊂ Pr.
Let H, F ∈ Div(Z) respectively be a hyperplane section and a ruling plane of Z, so that
each divisor on Z is linearly equivalent to mH + nF for some integers m, n. Let X ⊂ Pr
be an non-degenerate irreducible surface of degree d which is contained in Z as a divisor
linearly equivalent to H + (d − r + 2)F .
(A) One can easily see that h0(X, OX(1)) = h0(Z, OZ(1)) + d − r + 1 = d + 2. This
smooth rational normal surface scroll, a cone over a rational normal curve or the Veronese
surface in P5. As d + 1 > 5, and as a cone does not admit a proper isomorphic linear
means that the linearly normal embedding eX ⊂ Pd+1 of X by means of OX (1) is of
minimal degree and X is a regular projection of eX. Keep in mind, that eX is either a
projection, eX ⊂ Pd+1 is a smooth rational normal surface scroll. This means that X is
smooth and sectionally rational. Also reg(X) = d − r + 3 (cf.
hence X is a surface of extremal regularity.
[P, Theorem 4.3]) and
(B) Let L be a line section of Z. Then the intersection number L · X takes the maximal
possible value d − r + 3. This means that either L is contained in X or else it is a proper
(d − r + 3)-secant line to X. On the other hand, observe that any proper (d − r + 3)-secant
line to X must be contained in Z as a line section, since Z is cut out by quadrics.
To reformulate this observation, we introduce the locally closed subset
Σ◦(X) := {L ∈ G(1, Pr) d − r + 3 ≤ length(X ∩ L) < ∞} ⊂ G(1, Pr)
of proper (d − r + 3)-secant lines to X, so that Σ◦(X) = Σ(X). The previous observation
now may be written in the form
Σ◦(X) = {L ∈ G(1, Pr) L is a line section of Z and L * X}.
(C) Suppose that a ≥ 2 and let L be the unique line section S(1) of Z.
If L is
contained in X, then we have Σ◦(X) = ∅ and hence Σ(X) = ∅. So, in this case X is a
surface of maximal regularity, having no proper extremal secant line at all. Next, if L is
(D) Suppose next, that a = 1 and b ≥ 2. Then, by part (B), we have
not contained in X, then we have Σ◦(X) = Σ(X) = {L}, and hence dim(cid:0)Σ(X)(cid:1) = 0.
lines to X. This implies that dim(cid:0)Σ(X)(cid:1) = dim(cid:0)Σ◦(X)(cid:1) = 1 and that F+(X) is exactly
Since X 6= S(1, 1), all but finitely many line sections of Z are proper (d − r + 3)-secant
Σ◦(X) = {L ∈ S(1, 1) L is a line section of Z and L * X}.
equal to S(1, 1).
ON SURFACES OF MAXIMAL SECTIONAL REGULARITY
31
Surfaces of maximal sectional regularity of type I. We now provide a few examples
for surfaces of maximal sectional regularity of type I, focusing on the various Betti tables
which may occur. These tables have been computed by means of the Computer Algebra
System Singular [DGSch]. We use the divisorial description of surfaces of type I given in
Theorem 2.1
7.2. Example. Let X ⊂ W := S(1, 1, 1) ⊂ P5 be a divisor which is linearly equivalent to
H + (d − 3)F . Then X is given by an isomorphic projection of a smooth rational normal
scroll eX ⊂ Pd+1 (see [P, Lemma 3.1]).
(A) Let d = 8 and assume that X has the parametrization
{(cid:0)u7s : u7t : vs7 : vs6t : vst6 : vst7(cid:1) (s, t), (u, v) ∈ k2 \ {(0, 0)}}.
Then, X has the following Betti table.
i
βi,1
βi,2
βi,3
βi,4
βi,5
2
2
0
0
0
5
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
21 70 87 48 10
4
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
(B) Let d = 9 and assume that X has the parametrization
{(cid:0)u7s : u7t : vs8 : vs7t : vst7 : vt8(cid:1) (s, t), (u, v) ∈ k2 \ {(0, 0)}}.
Then, we get the following Betti table for X.
i
βi,1
βi,2
βi,3
βi,3
βi,4
βi,5
2
2
0
0
0
0
1
5
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
28 96 123 70 15
3
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
(C) Let d = 10 and assume that X has the parametrization
{(cid:0)u9s : u9t : vs9 : vs8t : vst8 : vst9(cid:1) (s, t), (u, v) ∈ k2 \ {(0, 0)}}.
Then, the Betti table of X is as given below.
i
βi,1
βi,2
βi,3
βi,3
βi,3
βi,4
βi,5
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
36 126 165 96 21
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
32
MARKUS BRODMANN, WANSEOK LEE, EUISUNG PARK, PETER SCHENZEL
Surfaces of maximal sectional regularity of type II. Next, we aim to present
examples which concern surfaces X ⊂ Pr (r ≥ 5) of maximal sectional regularity of
degree d > r and of type II. Set Y := X ∪ F(X) and recall that τ (X) denotes the pair
(depth(X), depth(Y )). We will construct a few examples of X, having all possible τ (X)
listed in Theorem 5.2(c).
7.3. Construction and Examples. (A) We assume that the characteristic of the base
field k is zero. Let a, b be integers such that 3 ≤ a ≤ b and consider the standard smooth
(B) Let Λ be an (a − 3)-dimensional subspace of hS(a)i = Pa which avoids S(a) and let
of Pa+b+1. The occurring Betti diagrams have been computed by means of the Computer
Algebra System Singular [DGSch].
rational normal surface scroll eX := S(a, b) ⊂ Pa+b+1. We shall construct surfaces of
maximal sectional regularity of type II by projecting eX from appropriate linear subspaces
X ⊂ Pb+3 be the linear projection of eX from Λ. Observe that this linear projection maps
hS(a)i onto a plane P2 = F ⊂ Pb+3. Suppose that this projection maps S(a) birationally
onto a plane curve Ca ⊂ F of degree a. Since X ⊂ Pb+3 is a surface of degree a + b, we
have reg(X) ≤ a by Theorem 5.2(a). On the other hand, a general line on F is a proper
a-secant line to X. Therefore reg(X) = a, X is a surface of maximal sectional regularity
of type II and F(X) = F. Finally, we get τ (X) = (2, 3) by Theorem 5.2(c).
(C) Assume that b ≥ 3. Let Λ be a (b − 3)-dimensional subspace of hS(b)i = Pb which
avoids S(b) and let X ⊂ Pa+3 be the linear projection of eX from Λ. So, this linear
projection maps hS(b)i onto a plane P2 = F ⊂ Pa+3. From now on, we assume that this
projection maps S(b) birationally onto a plane curve Cb ⊂ F of degree b. Then as in
(B), one can see that X ⊂ Pr is a surface of maximal sectional regularity of type II and
F(X) = F. If b ≤ a + 2, then we have τ (X) = (2, 3) by Theorem 5.2(c).
(D) From now on, we assume that b ≥ a + 3, and we will vary the projection center Λ.
To do so, we first consider the canonical isomorphism
κ : P1 → S(b),
[s : t] 7→ [0 : . . . : 0 : sb : sb−1t : . . . : stb−1 : tb] ∈ Pa+b+1.
Then, we choose a homogeneous polynomial f ∈ k[s, t] of degree b which is not divisible
by s and by t. Now, let
Λf = Pb−3 ⊂ hS(b)i \ S(b)
be such that the composition map
ϕf := πΛf ◦ κ : P1 → Cb ⊂ F = P2
of the linear projection map
with the above map κ sends [s : t] to [sb : f : tb]. Let
πΛf : Pa+b+1 \ Λf ։ Pa+3
denote the image of the scroll eX under the linear projection map πΛf centered at Λf .
Then, we may write
Xf := {[usa : usa−1t : . . . : usta−1 : uta : vsb : vf (s, t) : vtb] (s, t), (u, v) ∈ K 2 \ {(0, 0)}}.
Xf := πΛf (eX) ⊂ Pa+2
ON SURFACES OF MAXIMAL SECTIONAL REGULARITY
33
After an appropriate choice of f , this latter presentation is accessible to syzygetic com-
putations.
7.4. Example. Let (a, b) = (3, 5) and f := s4t + s3t2 + s2t3 + st4. Then Xf ⊂ P6 is of
degree d = 8(= 2r − 4) and the graded Betti numbers βi,j = βi,j(X) of X are as presented
in the following table.
i
βi,1
βi,2
βi,3
βi,4
3
3
2
8
4 5 6
1
6
0 0 0
4 12 12 4 0 0
0
0 0 0
4 1 0
1
0
6
0
4
By Proposition 5.14 (a) it follows from this graded Betti diagram of X, that
τ (X) = (2, 3).
7.5. Example. Let (a, b) = (3, 8) and consider Xfi ⊂ P6 (i = 1, 2, 3) for the following
choices of fi:
(1) f1 = s7t + s6t2 + s5t3 + s4t4 + s3t5 + s2t6 + st7,
(2) f2 = s7t + s6t2 + s5t3 + s4t4 + s3t5 + s2t6, and
(3) f3 = s7t + s6t2 + s5t3 + s4t4.
Then Xfi ⊂ P6 is of degree d = 11 (= 2r − 1 = 3r − 7) for all i = 1, 2, 3. The graded
Betti diagrams of Xf1, Xf2 and Xf3 are given respectively in the three tables below.
i
βi,1
βi,2
βi,3
βi,4
βi,5
βi,6
βi,7
i
βi,1
βi,2
βi,3
βi,4
βi,5
βi,6
βi,7
2
8
0
3
3
0
4 5 6
1
0 0 0
6
0
0 0 0
4 12 12 4 0 0
0 0 0
0
1
4 1 0
0 0 0
0
1
4 1 0
0
4
0
4
0
6
0
6
5
0
0
0
2
5
0
9
4
0
0
4
3
0
1
11
6
1
0
5
0
1
0
1
4 18 32 28 12 2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
4
0
0
1
0
0
6
0
0
4
34
MARKUS BRODMANN, WANSEOK LEE, EUISUNG PARK, PETER SCHENZEL
i
βi,1
βi,2
βi,3
βi,4
βi,5
βi,6
βi,7
2
2
3
0
4 5
1
3
0 0
10 27 24 7 0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0
1
4 1
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
4
By Proposition 5.14 (a) we can see from these tables that
τ (Xf1) = (2, 2),
τ (Xf2) = (1, 1) and τ (Xf3) = (2, 3).
7.6. Example. Let (a, b) = (3, 9) and consider Xfi ⊂ P6, (i = 1, 2) for the two choices
(1) f1 = s8t + s7t2 + s6t3 + s5t4 + s4t5 + s3t6 + s2t7 + st8 and
(2) f2 = s8t + s7t2 + s6t3 + s5t4 + s4t5 + s3t6 + s2t7.
Then Xfi ⊂ P6 is of degree d = 12 (= 2r = 3r − 6) for i = 1, 2. The graded Betti
diagrams of Xf1 and Xf2 are given respectively in the tables below.
i
βi,1
βi,2
βi,3
βi,4
βi,5
βi,6
βi,7
βi,8
i
βi,1
βi,2
βi,3
βi,4
βi,5
βi,6
βi,7
βi,8
3
3
0
0
4 5 6
1 2
0 0 0
6 8
0 0 0
0 0
2 4
0 0 0
1 4 10 6 1 0
0 0 0
0 0
4 1 0
1 4
0 0 0
0 0
1 4
4 1 0
0
6
0
6
4
0
0
5
0
5
0
0
0
0
6
1
3
0
5
0
0
0
1
0
5 15 15
0
0
0
5 23 42 38 17 3
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
6
0
0
4
2
5
0
0
0
0
4
By Proposition 5.14 (a) we can verify that
τ (Xf1) = (2, 2) and τ (Xf2) = (1, 1).
7.7. Problem and Remark. (A) Let 5 ≤ r < d and let X ⊂ Pr be a non-degenerate
surface of degree d which is of maximal sectional regularity. We consider the three condi-
tions
(i) N(X) ≤ d − r.
(ii) β1,d−r+2(X) = 1.
ON SURFACES OF MAXIMAL SECTIONAL REGULARITY
35
(iii) F(X) = P2 or -- equivalently -- X is of type II.
(B) By the implication (i) ⇒ (iii) given in statement (a) of Theorem 6.2 we have the
implication (i) ⇒ (ii) among the above three conditions. By the implication (i) ⇒ (ii)
given in statement (b) of Theorem 6.2 we have the implication (ii) ⇒ (iii) among the
above three conditions.
We expect, that the converse of both implications holds but could not prove this. So we
aim to pose the problem
(P) Are the three conditions (i), (ii) and (iii) of part (A) equivalent ?
Observe, that in view of Remark 6.3 (A) an affirmative answer to this would also answer
affirmatively the question, whether for surfaces of type II, the extended extremal variety
and the extremal variety of X coincide (see Notation and Reminder 2.11), hence the
question whether
(Q)
F+(X) = F(X) for X of type II ?
Obviously, this latter question would been affirmatively answered if we could answer
affirmatively the question
(R)
∗Σ(X) = Σ(X) for X of type II ?
Acknowledgement. The first named author thanks to the Korea University Seoul, to
the Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach, to the Martin-Luther Universitat
Halle and to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for their hospitality and the financial
support provided during the preparation of this work.The second named author was sup-
ported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of
Korea(NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education(2014008404). The third named author
was supported by the NRF-DAAD GEnKO Program (NRF-2011-0021014). The fourth
named author thanks to the Korea University Seoul, to the Mathematisches Forschungsin-
stitut Oberwolfach and to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for their hospitality re-
spectively financial support offered during the preparation of this work.
References
[AK]
[AlB]
[B1]
[B2]
[Be]
Ahn, J., Kwak, S.: Graded mapping cone theorem, multisecants and syzygies, Journal of
Algebra 331 (2011) 243 - 262.
Albertini, C, Brodmann, M.: A bound on certain local cohomology modules and application
to ample divisors, Nagoya Mathematical Journal 163 (2001) 87-106.
Brodmann, M.: A few remarks on blowing-up and connectedness, Journal fur die reine und
angewandte Mathematik 370 (1986) 51 - 60.
Brodmann, M.: Cohomology of certain projective surfaces with low sectional genus and de-
gree, in: D. Eisenbud (Ed.) "Commutative Algebra, Algebraic Geometry and Computational
Methods", 172 - 200, Springer, 1999.
Bertin, M-A. : On the regularity of varieties having an extremal secant line. Journal fur die
reine und angewandte Mathematik. 545 (2002), 167 - 181.
[BLPS1] Brodmann, M., Lee, W., Park, E., Schenzel, P.: On projective varieties of maximal
sectional regularity. Preprint (2014).
[BLPS2] Brodmann, M., Lee, W., Park, E., Schenzel, P.: On varieties of maximal sectional
[BP2]
regularity in codimension two. In preparation.
Brodmann, M., Park, E.: On varieties of almost minimal degree III: Tangent spaces and
embedding scrolls. Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 215 (2011) 2859 - 2872.
36
MARKUS BRODMANN, WANSEOK LEE, EUISUNG PARK, PETER SCHENZEL
[BS1]
[BS2]
[BS3]
[BS4]
[BSh]
[C]
Brodmann, M., Schenzel, P.: Curves of degree r + 2 in Pr: Cohomological, geometric, and
homological aspects. Journal of Algebra 242 (2001), 577 - 623.
Brodmann, M., Schenzel, P.: On projective curves of maximal regularity. Mathematische
Zeitschrift 244 (2003), 271 - 289.
Brodmann, M., Schenzel, P.: Projective curves with maximal regularity and applications
to syzygies and surfaces. Manuscripta Mathematica 135 (2011) 469 - 495.
Brodmann, M., Schenzel, P.: Projective surfaces of degree r + 1 in Projective r-space and
almost non-singular projections. Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 216 (2012) 2241-2255.
Brodmann, M., Sharp, R.Y.: Local cohomology -- an algebraic introduction with geomet-
ric applications. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics Vol. 60, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998.
Castelnuovo, G.: Sui multipli di une serie lineare di gruppi di punti appartenente ad une
curva algebraic, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo (2) 7 (1893), 89-110.
[ChFN] Chardin, M., Fall, A.M., Nagel, U.: Bounds for the Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity of
modules. Mathematische Zeitschrift 258 (2008) 69 - 80.
[DGSch] Decker, M., Greuel, G.M., Schonemann, H.: Singular 3 − 1 − 2 -- A computer algebra
[E]
[EG]
[Ek]
[Fu]
[GrL]
system for polynomial computations. http://www.singular.uni-kl.de (2011).
Eisenbud, D>: Commutative algebra with a view toward algebraic geometry. Graduate Texts
in Mathematics 150, Springer, New York, 1994.
Eisenbud, D., Goto, S.: Linear free resolutions and minimal multiplicity. J. Algebra 88
(1984) 89 - 133.
Ekedal, T.: Canonical models of surfaces of general type in positive characteristic. Publica-
tions Math´ematiques de l' I.H.E.S, 67 (1988) 97 - 144.
Fujita, T.: Classification theories of polarized varieties, London Mathematical Society Lec-
ture Notes Series 155, Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Green, M., Lazarsfeld, R.: Some results on the syzygies of finite sets and algebraic curves.
Compositio Mathematica 67 (1988), 301 - 314.
[GruLPe] Gruson, L., Lazarsfeld, R., Peskine, C.: On a theorem of Castelnuovo and the equations
[KwP]
[L]
[M]
[No]
[P]
[Pi]
defining space curves. Inventiones Mathematicae 72 (1983), 491 - 506.
Kwak, S., Park, E.: Some effects of property Np on the higher normality and defining
equations of nonlinearly normal varieties. Journal fur die reine und angewandte Mathematik
582 (2005) 87 - 105.
Lazarsfeld, R.: A sharp Castelnuovo bound for smooth surfaces. Duke Mathematical Jornal
55 (1987) 423 - 429.
Mumford, D.: Lectures on curves on an algebraic surface. Annals of Mathematics Studies
59, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1966.
Noma, A.: A bound on the Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity for curves. Mathematische An-
nalen 322 (2002) 69 - 74.
Park, E.: On syzygies of divisors of rational normal scrolls. Mathematische Nachrichten 287
(2014), no. 11-12, 1383 - 1393.
Pinkham, H.: A Castelnuovo bound for smooth surfaces. Inventiones Mathematicae 83 (1986),
321 - 332.
Universitat Zurich, Institut fur Mathematik, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH -- Zurich,
Switzerland
E-mail address: [email protected]
Pukyong National University, Department of applied Mathematics, Daeyeon Campus
45, Yongso-ro, Nam-Gu, Busan, Republic of Korea
E-mail address: [email protected]
ON SURFACES OF MAXIMAL SECTIONAL REGULARITY
37
Korea University, Department of Mathematics, Anam-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 136-
701, Republic of Korea
E-mail address: [email protected]
Martin-Luther-Universitat Halle-Wittenberg, Institut fur Informatik, Von-Secken-
dorff-Platz 1, D -- 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany
E-mail address: [email protected]
|
1712.00911 | 2 | 1712 | 2019-01-24T21:37:01 | Nash blow-ups of jet schemes | [
"math.AG"
] | Given an arbitrary projective birational morphism of varieties, we provide a natural and explicit way of constructing relative compactifications of the maps induced on the main components of the jet schemes. In the case the morphism is the Nash blow-up of a variety, such relative compactifications are shown to be given by the Nash blow-ups of the main components of the jet schemes. | math.AG | math |
Nash blow-ups of jet schemes
Tommaso de Fernex and Roi Docampo
Abstract. Given an arbitrary projective birational morphism of varieties, we provide a
natural and explicit way of constructing relative compactifications of the maps induced on
the main components of the jet schemes. In the case the morphism is the Nash blow-up
of a variety, such relative compactifications are shown to be given by the Nash blow-ups
of the main components of the jet schemes.
1. Introduction
The Nash blow-up of a variety is defined as the universal projective birational morphism
for which the pull-back of the sheaf of differentials admits a locally free quotient of the same
rank. The name comes from John Nash, who is generally credited for having promoted the
question of whether singularities of algebraic varieties can always be resolved by finitely
many iterations of such blow-ups; before him, the question had already been considered by
Semple [Sem54]. The property is known to hold for curves of characteristic zero, and to
fail in positive characteristics [Nob75]. A variant of this question, where Nash blow-ups are
alternated with normalizations, has been settled affirmatively for surfaces of characteristic
zero by Spivakovsky [Spi90], building on [Hir83]. Higher order Nash blow-ups have been
defined and studied by Yasuda [Yas07].
The Nash blow-up can be thought as the universal operation separating multiple limits of
tangent spaces, and hence its construction relates to the geometry of the main component
of the first jet scheme of the variety. It is however unclear a priori how the Nash blow-up
of a variety should relate to the Nash blow-up of such component. Even less obvious is
whether there should be a relationship with the Nash blow-ups of the main components of
the higher jet schemes of the variety.
The following result shows that these Nash blow-ups are not just related, but in fact
they essentially determine each other.
Theorem 1.1. Let X be a variety. For every n, the main component of the n-th jet
scheme of the Nash blow-up of X has an open immersion into the Nash blow-up of the
main component of the n-th jet scheme of X, and such immersion is compatible with the
respective natural map to the n-th jet scheme of X.
Denoting by N (X) → X the Nash blow-up of a variety and by J ′
n(X) the main compo-
nent of the n-th jet scheme of X, Theorem 1.1 can be rephrased by saying that the Nash
blow-up N (J ′
n(N (X)) →
J ′
n(X) induced on n-jets by the Nash blow-up of X. This implies that the Nash blow-up
n(X) gives a relative compactification of the map J ′
n(X)) → J ′
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 14E18; Secondary 14E04, 14B05.
Key words and phrases. Jet scheme, Nash blow-up, singularities, Grassmannian, functor of points.
The research of the first author was partially supported by NSF Grant DMS-1700769.
2
Nash blow-ups of jet schemes
of a variety X can equivalently be characterized as the universal projective birational mor-
n(X) has a
phism Y → X such that, for every n, the pull-back of ΩJ ′
locally free quotient of the same rank. The theorem also implies that the Nash blow-up
of J ′
n(X) induces the Nash blow-up of X under the natural section (the 'zero section') of
the projection J ′
n(X) → X. It was shown by Ishii [Ish09] that if a variety X is singular
then all of its jet schemes are singular, and Theorem 1.1 implies that, if the ground field
is algebraically closed of characteristic zero, then in fact the main components of the jet
schemes are already singular.
n(X) via J ′
n(Y ) → J ′
The proof of Theorem 1.1 uses the description of the sheaves of differentials on jet
schemes given in [dFD] in combination with Theorem 1.2 (stated below), which addresses
a related question in a more general context.
Suppose that µ : Y → X is an arbitrary projective birational morphism of varieties.
By functoriality, µ induces for every n a morphism on jet schemes µn : Jn(Y ) → Jn(X),
and hence, by restriction, a birational morphism µ′
n(X) between the main
components of the jet schemes. In general, µ′
n is not a projective morphism, and one can
ask whether there are natural ways of constructing relative compactifications of µ′
n. The
next theorem provides an answer to this question.
n(Y ) → J ′
n : J ′
n(X) whose blow-up gives a relative compactification of µ′
The morphism µ can be described as the blow-up of an ideal sheaf I ⊂ OX , and a
way to approach the question is to look for natural ways of constructing an ideal sheaf
n. Doing this directly
an ⊂ OJ ′
seems hard: while a posteriori we will provide an explicit formula for computing the local
generators of such an ideal an in terms of the generators of I, the formula will show that
the complexity of an grows fast even in simple examples, an indication that looking at
ideals might not be the best approach.
Instead, we view µ as the Nash transformation N (F) → X of a coherent sheaf F, as
defined for instance in [OZ91]. In this language, the blow-up of an ideal I ⊂ OX is the
same as the Nash transformation N (I) → X of the ideal, and the Nash blow-up of a variety
X is defined to be the Nash transformation N (ΩX ) → X of the sheaf of differentials of X.
In general, the Nash transformation of a coherent sheaf F of rank r is defined using the
Grassmann bundle of locally free quotients of rank r of F, and is a projective birational
morphism. Conversely, every projective birational morphism µ : Y → X can be realized as
a Nash transformation of some coherent sheaf F on X.
Theorem 1.2. Let X be a variety over a field k, and let µ : N (F) → X be the Nash
transformation of a coherent sheaf F on X. For every n, let
J ′
n(X) × ∆n
γ ′
n
/ X
ρ′
n
J ′
n(X)
be the diagram induced by restriction from the universal n-jet of X; here, we denote ∆n =
Spec k[t]/(tn+1). Define
F ′
n := (ρ′
n)∗(γ′
n)∗F.
Then the induced map µ′
n : J ′
n(N (F)) → J ′
n(X) factors as
where ιn is an open immersion and νn is the Nash transformation of F ′
n.
J ′
n(N (F))
ιn
/ N (F ′
n)
νn
/ J ′
n(X)
/
/
/
Tommaso de Fernex and Roi Docampo
3
If in this theorem we take F = I ⊂ OX , an ideal sheaf on X, then F ′
n is not an ideal
n, modulo torsion, is isomorphic to an ideal sheaf an,
n) = N (an). Our approach enables us to make explicit computations and hence
sheaf. However, the sheaf ∧(n+1)F ′
and N (F ′
to provide a formula for the generators of an.
A motivation for Theorem 1.2 comes from the Nash problem on families of arcs through
the singularities of a variety [Nas95] and, more specifically, from the problem of lifting
wedges [LJ80,Reg06]. In dimension two, the Nash problem has been settled in characteristic
zero in [FdBPP12] but it remains open in positive characteristics. The algebraic proof given
in [dFD16] may be adaptable to positive characteristics, provided one can avoid certain
wild ramifications that could occur in the proof. A possible approach is to look for suitable
deformations of wedges, and this requires working with relative compactifications of the
maps Jn(Y ) → Jn(X) where Y → X is the minimal resolution of the surface. Theorem 1.2
provides a first step in this direction.
1.1. Acknowledgments. We thank Mircea Mustat¸a for pointing out an error in a pre-
vious version of the paper and the referee for a careful reading of the paper and valuable
comments and corrections.
2. Proofs
We work over an arbitrary field k. For every integer n ≥ 0, the n-th jet scheme Jn(X)
of a scheme X is the scheme representing the functor of points defined by
for any scheme Z, where ∆n = Spec k[t]/(tn+1). We denote by
Jn(X)(Z) = X(Z × ∆n)
Jn(X) × ∆n
γn
/ X
ρn
Jn(X)
the universal n-jet of X. For generalities about jet schemes, we refer to [Voj07, EM09]. If
X is a variety, then there exists a unique irreducible component of Jn(X) dominating X,
and this component has dimension (n + 1) dim X. We shall denote it by J ′
n(X) and call it
the main component of Jn(X).
Given a coherent sheaf F on a scheme X, and a positive integer r, we denote by Gr(F, r)
the Grassmann bundle over X parameterizing locally free quotients of F of rank r, where by
the term quotient we mean an equivalence class of surjective maps from the same source
where two surjections are identified whenever they have the same kernel. This scheme
represents the functor of points given by
Gr(F, r)(Z) = (cid:8)(cid:0)Z
p
−→ X, p∗F ։ Q(cid:1)
Q locally free sheaf on Z of rank r(cid:9)
for any scheme Z.
Suppose now that X is a variety, and let F be a coherent sheaf on X of rank r. The Nash
transformation of F is defined to be the irreducible component of Gr(F, r) dominating X,
and is denoted by N (F). The natural projection Gr(F, r) → X induces the blow-up map
N (F) → X. The Nash blow-up N (X) → X is, by definition, the Nash transformation of
the sheaf of Kahler differentials ΩX.
/
4
Nash blow-ups of jet schemes
Proof of Theorem 1.2. The sheaf F ′
of the sheaf
n is the restriction, under the inclusion J ′
n(X) ⊂ Jn(X),
Fn := (ρn)∗γ∗
nF.
By construction, J ′
Similarly, observing that F ′
is an irreducible component of Jn(X), we see that N (F ′
Gr(Fn, (n + 1)r). We claim that there is a universally injective map
n(N (F)) is an irreducible component of the jet scheme Jn(Gr(F, r)).
n(X)
n) is an irreducible component of
n is a sheaf of rank (n + 1)r and keeping in mind that J ′
i : Jn(Gr(F, r)) ֒→ Gr(Fn, (n + 1)r),
defined over X, which agrees with the natural identification of these schemes over the open
set where X is smooth and F is locally free, and restricts to an open immersion from
n(N (X)) to N (J ′
J ′
n(X)). Note that the existence of such a map implies the statement of
the theorem.
In order to prove this claim, we compare the functors of points of the schemes Jn(Gr(F, r))
and Gr(Fn, (n + 1)r). For every scheme Z, we have
Jn(Gr(F, r))(Z) = Gr(F, r)(Z × ∆n)
and
Gr(Fn, (n + 1)r)(Z) = (cid:8)(cid:0)Z
= (cid:8)(cid:0)Z × ∆n
α
−→ X, α∗F ։ Q(cid:1)
Q locally free sheaf on Z × ∆n of rank r(cid:9)
−→ Jn(X), β∗Fn ։ R(cid:1)
R locally free sheaf on Z of rank (n + 1)r(cid:9).
β
By the description of Jn(X) via the functor of points, every β : Z → Jn(X) corresponds
to a unique α : Z × ∆n → X, and for any such pair of maps there is a commutative diagram
α
Z × ∆n
β×id∆n
Jn(X) × ∆n
/ X
γn
π
Z
ρn
/ Jn(X)
β
where π is the projection onto the first factor. Note that taking push-forward along π of
a sheaf on Z × ∆n simply means that we are restricting scalars to OZ and forgetting the
given OZ×∆n-module structure of the sheaf.
By the definition of Fn and base-change, which holds in this setting because ρn and π
are affine, we have
β∗Fn = π∗α∗F.
Using the identification Jn(X)(Z) = X(Z × ∆n), the above formula yields the following
alternative description of the functor of points of Gr(Fn, (n + 1)r):
Gr(Fn, (n + 1)r)(Z) = (cid:8)(cid:0)Z × ∆n
α
−→ X, π∗α∗F ։ R(cid:1)
R locally free sheaf on Z of rank (n + 1)r(cid:9).
For every locally free sheaf Q on Z × ∆n of rank r, the push-forward π∗Q is a locally free
sheaf on Z of rank (n + 1)r. Taking push-forwards via π is exact, and any two quotients
/
/
(
(
/
/
Tommaso de Fernex and Roi Docampo
5
of α∗F are identified (i.e., they define the same kernel in α∗F) if and only if their push-
forwards are identified as quotients of π∗α∗F (i.e., they define the same kernel in π∗α∗F).
This means that taking push-forwards via π defines a natural injection
Jn(Gr(F, r))(Z) ֒→ Gr(Fn, (n + 1)r)(Z).
As this holds for every scheme Z, we deduce that there is a naturally defined universally
injective morphism
i : Jn(Gr(F, r)) ֒→ Gr(Fn, (n + 1)r).
It is immediate to see that i is defined over X and therefore it agrees with the natural
identification of these schemes over the open set where X is smooth and F is locally
free. Furthermore, the restriction of i to J ′
n(N (F)) gives a universally injective map
ιn : J ′
n). To finish the proof, we need to show that ιn is a local iso-
morphism, that is, it induces isomorphisms on all local rings. To this end, we prove the
following property.
n(N (F)) → N (F ′
Lemma 2.1. Let (A, m) be a Noetherian local domain over k, and set U = Spec A and
P = Spec A/m. Assume that f0 and g are morphisms as in the diagram
P
f0
f
Jn(Gr(F, r))
i
U g
Gr(Fn, (n + 1)r)
such that the square sub-diagram commutes and the image of g is a dense subset of N (F ′
n).
Then there exists a unique morphism f (marked by the dotted arrow in the diagram) making
the whole diagram commute.
Proof. Suppose f0 and g are given. Let π0 : P × ∆n → P and π : U × ∆n → U denote
the respective projections to the first components. By the descriptions of the functors of
points, we can write
where R is a locally free A-module of rank (n + 1)r. The commutativity of the square sub-
diagram in the statement means that α0 is the restriction of α and R ⊗A A/m = (π0)∗Q.
n) implies that α is dominant, and hence π∗α∗F
The fact that the image of g is dense in N (F ′
is a sheaf of rank (n + 1)r. Since R is a locally free quotient of the same rank of π∗α∗F, the
kernel K of π∗α∗F → R is the torsion A-submodule of π∗α∗F. Every element of Pi≥0 tiK,
viewed as an A-submodule of π∗α∗F, is torsion, and therefore we have Pi≥0 tiK = K. This
shows that K is an A[t]/(tn+1)-submodule of π∗α∗F and hence R is an A[t]/(tn+1)-module
quotient of π∗α∗F. This gives the lift f of g as in the diagram, which is clearly unique and
makes the diagram commute.
(cid:3)
We apply Lemma 2.1 to the local rings of N (F ′
n) at the points in the image of ιn. Using
the fact that i is injective on the functors of points, we deduce that i induces isomorphisms
on the local rings.
To see this last implication, let Oq denote the local ring of J ′
n(N (F)) at a point q, and
n) at p = ιn(q). Let g : Spec Op → Gr(Fn, (n + 1)r)
let Op denote the local ring of N (F ′
where Q is a locally free A[t]/(tn+1)-module of rank r, and
f0 = (cid:0)P × ∆n
g = (cid:0)U × ∆n
α0−→ X, α∗
0F ։ Q(cid:1),
α−→ X, π∗α∗F ։ R(cid:1)
/
/
_
_
/
/
8
8
6
Nash blow-ups of jet schemes
and h : Spec Oq → Jn(Gr(F, r)) be the natural maps, and let j : Spec Oq → Spec Op be
the map induced by ιn.
We have the following diagram:
Spec Oq
s
j
h
f
Jn(Gr(F, r))
i
Spec Op
g
Gr(Fn, (n + 1)r).
Here, the square sub-diagram is commutative, f exists by Lemma 2.1 and hence satisfies
i ◦ f = g,
(2a)
and the universal property of local rings implies that f factors through h, so that we have
a morphism s, as in the diagram, satisfying
h ◦ s = f.
(2b)
Using the commutativity of the square sub-diagram and Eq. (2a), we get
i ◦ h = g ◦ j = i ◦ f ◦ j.
Then, using the fact that i is injective at the level of functors of points and hence is a
monomorphism, we deduce that
h = f ◦ j.
(2c)
Now, using Eqs. (2b) and (2c), we get
h = f ◦ j = h ◦ s ◦ j,
and since h is a monomorphism, this implies that s ◦ j is the identity of Spec Oq. Using
Eqs. (2b) and (2c) in a different order, we get
f = h ◦ s = f ◦ j ◦ s.
Since g is a monomorphism, it follows by Eq. (2a) that f is a monomorphism, and this
implies that j ◦ s is the identity of Spec Op. This proves that j is an isomorphism, which
completes the proof of the theorem.
(cid:3)
Proof of Theorem 1.1. By [dFD, Theorem B], there is an isomorphism
ΩJn(X)
∼= (ρn)∗γ∗
nΩX,
and this implies that
N (J ′
n(X)) = N(cid:0)(ρn)∗γ∗
n are the restrictions of ρn and γn to J ′
nΩX ⊗OJn(X) OJ ′
n(X)(cid:1) = N(cid:0)(ρ′
where ρ′
reduces to Theorem 1.2 with F = ΩX.
n and γ′
n)∗(γ′
n)∗ΩX(cid:1),
n(X) × ∆. Therefore Theorem 1.1
(cid:3)
Corollary 2.2. For any variety X, the following properties are equivalent:
(1) the Nash blow-up N (J ′
(2) the Nash blow-up N (J ′
n(X)) → J ′
n(X)) → J ′
n(X) is an isomorphism for some n ≥ 0;
n(X) is an isomorphism for every n ≥ 0.
Proof. By Theorem 1.1, both properties are equivalent to the fact that the Nash blow-up
N (X) → X is an isomorphism.
(cid:3)
/
/
/
/
B
B
6
6
Tommaso de Fernex and Roi Docampo
7
In positive characteristics, there are examples of singular varieties whose Nash blow-up
is an isomorphism (see [Nob75, Example 1]), and Corollary 2.2 implies that this property,
whenever it holds, propagates through all the jet schemes, and conversely.
By contrast, when the ground field is algebraically closed of characteristic zero the Nash
blow-up is an isomorphism if and only if the variety is smooth (see [Nob75, Theorem 2]). It
is elementary to show that the jet schemes of a smooth variety are smooth, and conversely
it was proved in [Ish09] that if X is a singular variety then all its jet schemes Jn(X) are
singular. With the above assumptions on the ground field, we deduce the following stronger
statement from Corollary 2.2.
Corollary 2.3. If X is a singular variety defined over an algebraically closed field of
characteristic zero, then the main component of J ′
n(X) of Jn(X) is singular for every n.
3. Computational aspects
After viewing a projective birational morphism µ : Y → X as the Nash transformation
of a coherent sheaf F on a variety X, Theorem 1.2 provides a construction of a relative
compactification of the induced map µ′
n(X) by taking the Nash transfor-
mation of an explicitly described sheaf F ′
n(X). Such transformation is a projective
birational morphism, and therefore can also be described as the blow-up of an ideal sheaf
an on J ′
n(X). In this section we explain how to compute such ideal.
n : J ′
n on J ′
n(Y ) → J ′
For simplicity, we assume that X = Spec R is affine. The following diagram provides
the algebraic counterpart of the restriction to J ′
n(X) of the universal n-jet:
R′
n[t]/(tn+1)
(γ ′
n)♯
R
(ρ′
n)♯
R′
n
Here R′
(ρ′
n is a quotient of Rn, the algebra of Hasse -- Schmidt differentials of order at most n,
n)♯ is the natural inclusion map, and (γ′
n)♯ is induced by the homomorphism
n : R → Rn[t]/(tn+1),
γ♯
f 7→
n
Xi=0
Di(f ) ti,
where (D0, D1, . . . , Dn) is the universal Hasse -- Schmidt derivation of order n. With this
notation, we have Jn(X) = Spec Rn and J ′
n(X) = Spec R′
n.
n and (F/τ (F))′
If τ (F) denotes the torsion of F, then the two sheaves F ′
n have the same
torsion free quotient. We can therefore assume without loss of generality that F is torsion
free. Let F denote the R-module associated to F. If r is the rank of F , we can then realize
F as a submodule of Rr. Picking a set of generators for F of cardinality s, we obtain a
matrix M ∈ Matr×s(R) such that F = Im M . Notice that, to produce an ideal whose
blow-up gives Y → X, one can take the ideal generated by the r × r minors of M .
The relative compactification of µ′
by the Nash transformation of the R′
n(Y ) → J ′
n : J ′
n-module
n(X) constructed in Theorem 1.2 is given
F ′
n := (γ′
n)♯(F ) · (R′
n[t]/(tn+1))r,
o
o
O
O
8
Nash blow-ups of jet schemes
where the R′
that Fn = Im Mn where Mn ∈ Mat(n+1)r×(n+1)s(R′
n-module structure is defined via (ρ′
n)♯. A straightforward computation shows
n) is the matrix given in block form by
Mn =
D0(M )
D1(M ) D0(M )
0
...
...
Dn(M ) Dn−1(M )
0
0
...
· · ·
· · ·
. . .
· · · D0(M )
.
Here Di(M ) is the matrix obtained from M by applying Di to each entry. By construction,
we have the following property.
Proposition 3.1. With the above notation, the morphism N (F ′
of the ideal an ⊂ R′
n) → J ′
n generated by the (n + 1)r × (n + 1)r minors of Mn.
n(X) is the blow-up
The next example shows the computation of the first few ideals an in a simple case.
Example 3.2. Consider X = A2 = Spec k[x, y], and let Y → X be the blow-up of the
maximal ideal (x, y). Taking F to be the maximal ideal, we have
x1 y1 x y(cid:21) ,
0 0
y
M0 = (cid:2)x y(cid:3) ,
M1 = (cid:20) x
M2 =
M3 =
,
0
y
0
x
0 0
y
x
x1 y1
0 0
x2 y2 x1 y1 x y
0 0
x
y
0
0 0
x1 y1
y
x2 y2 x1 y1
0 0
x3 y3 x2 y2 x1 y1 x y
0
0
x
0
0
y
0
x
,
where xi = Di(x) and yi = Di(y). Letting an be the ideal generated by the (n + 1) × (n + 1)
minors of Mn, we have
a0 = (x, y),
2
a1 = a
0 + (xy1 − yx1),
a2 = a0 a1 + (y2x2 − yx2x − x1y1x + yx2
2
1+
a3 = a0 a2 + a
1, x2y2 − x1y1y − xy2y + xy2
1),
+ ( y3x3 − yx3x2 − x2y1x2 − x1y2x2 + 2yx1x2x + x2
1x + y2x3x + y2x1x2 + yx2
1y1x − yx3
1,
1y1,
1y − 2xy1y2y + xy3
1 − y3x3,
y1y2x2 − yy3x2 − x1y2
x2y1y2 + x1y2y2 + xy3y2 − x1y2
y2
2x2 − y1y3x2 + x2y2
1x + yx3y1x − 2yx2y2x − x1y1y2x +
2 − y2x1x3 − yx1x2y1 + yx2
+ yx1y3x + y2x2
1y2).
Notice that while the matrices Mn remain simple and have an easily recognizable structure,
the corresponding ideals an grow in complexity quite fast.
Tommaso de Fernex and Roi Docampo
9
References
[dFD16] Tommaso de Fernex and Roi Docampo, Terminal valuations and the Nash problem, Invent.
Math. 203 (2016), no. 1, 303 -- 331. (cit. on p. 3)
[dFD]
, Differentials on the arc space. Preprint, arXiv:1703.07505 [math.AG]. (cit. on pp. 2
and 6)
[EM09] Lawrence Ein and Mircea Mustat¸a, Jet schemes and singularities, Algebraic geometry -- Seattle
2005. Part 2, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 80, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2009,
pp. 505 -- 546. (cit. on p. 3)
[FdBPP12] Javier Fern´andez de Bobadilla and Mar´ıa Pe Pereira, The Nash problem for surfaces, Ann. of
Math. (2) 176 (2012), no. 3, 2003 -- 2029. (cit. on p. 3)
[Hir83] Heisuke Hironaka, On Nash blowing-up, Arithmetic and geometry, Vol. II, Progr. Math., vol. 36,
Birkhauser, Boston, Mass., 1983, pp. 103 -- 111. (cit. on p. 1)
[Ish09] Shihoko Ishii, Smoothness and jet schemes, Singularities -- Niigata -- Toyama 2007, Adv. Stud.
Pure Math., vol. 56, Math. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 2009, pp. 187 -- 199. (cit. on pp. 2 and 7)
[LJ80] Monique Lejeune-Jalabert, Arcs analytiques et r´esolution minimale des surfaces quasiho-
mog`enes, S´eminaire sur les Singularit´es des Surfaces (Palaiseau, France, 1976/1977), Lecture
Notes in Math., vol. 777, Springer, Berlin, 1980, pp. 303 -- 332 (French). (cit. on p. 3)
[Nas95] John F. Nash Jr., Arc structure of singularities, Duke Math. J. 81 (1995), no. 1, 31 -- 38 (1996).
A celebration of John F. Nash, Jr. (cit. on p. 3)
[Nob75] A. Nobile, Some properties of the Nash blowing-up, Pacific J. Math. 60 (1975), no. 1, 297 -- 305.
(cit. on pp. 1 and 7)
[OZ91] A. Oneto and E. Zatini, Remarks on Nash blowing-up, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Politec. Torino 49
(1991), no. 1, 71 -- 82 (1993). Commutative algebra and algebraic geometry, II (Italian) (Turin,
1990). (cit. on p. 2)
[Reg06] Ana J. Reguera, A curve selection lemma in spaces of arcs and the image of the Nash map,
Compos. Math. 142 (2006), no. 1, 119 -- 130. (cit. on p. 3)
[Sem54] J. G. Semple, Some investigations in the geometry of curve and surface elements, Proc. London
Math. Soc. (3) 4 (1954), 24 -- 49. (cit. on p. 1)
[Spi90] Mark Spivakovsky, Sandwiched singularities and desingularization of surfaces by normalized
Nash transformations, Ann. of Math. (2) 131 (1990), no. 3, 411 -- 491. (cit. on p. 1)
[Voj07] Paul Vojta, Jets via Hasse-Schmidt derivations, Diophantine geometry, CRM Series, vol. 4, Ed.
Norm., Pisa, 2007, pp. 335 -- 361. (cit. on p. 3)
[Yas07] Takehiko Yasuda, Higher Nash blowups, Compos. Math. 143 (2007), no. 6, 1493 -- 1510.
(cit. on p. 1)
Tommaso de Fernex
Roi Docampo
Department of Mathematics
University of Utah
155 South 1400 East
Salt Lake City, UT 48112
USA
Department of Mathematics
University of Oklahoma
601 Elm Avenue, Room 423
Norman, OK 73019
USA
[email protected]
[email protected]
|
1703.03390 | 1 | 1703 | 2017-03-09T18:45:28 | Complex adjoint orbits in Lie theory and geometry | [
"math.AG",
"math.DG",
"math.RT"
] | This expository article is an introduction to the adjoint orbits of complex semisimple groups, primarily in the algebro-geometric and Lie-theoretic contexts, and with a pronounced emphasis on the properties of semisimple and nilpotent orbits. It is intended to build a foundation for more specialized settings in which adjoint orbits feature prominently (ex. hyperk\"{a}hler geometry, Landau-Ginzburg models, and the theory of symplectic singularities). Also included are a few arguments and observations that, to the author's knowledge, have not yet appeared in the research literature. | math.AG | math | COMPLEX ADJOINT ORBITS IN LIE THEORY AND GEOMETRY
PETER CROOKS
ABSTRACT. This expository article is an introduction to the adjoint orbits of complex semisim-
ple groups, primarily in the algebro-geometric and Lie-theoretic contexts, and with a pro-
nounced emphasis on the properties of semisimple and nilpotent orbits.
It is intended
to build a foundation for more specialized settings in which adjoint orbits feature promi-
nently (ex. hyperkahler geometry, Landau-Ginzburg models, and the theory of symplectic
singularities). Also included are a few arguments and observations that, to the author's
knowledge, have not yet appeared in the research literature.
7
1
0
2
r
a
M
9
]
.
G
A
h
t
a
m
[
1
v
0
9
3
3
0
.
3
0
7
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
CONTENTS
Introduction
1.
1.1. Motivation and objectives
1.2. Structure of the article
1.3. Acknowledgements
1.4. General conventions
2. Preliminaries on algebraic group actions
2.1. Definitions and examples
2.2. Generalities on orbits
2.3. Orbits as quotient varieties
2.4. The closure order
3. Preliminaries on Lie theory
3.1. The basic objects
3.2. Semisimple and nilpotent elements
3.3. The Jacobson-Morozov Theorem and sl2(C)-triples
4. General adjoint orbits
4.1. Definitions and conventions
4.2. Dimension and regularity
4.3. Some first results
4.4. The adjoint quotient
4.5. Geometric features
5. Semisimple Orbits
5.1. Definitions and characterizations
5.2. Stabilizer descriptions
5.3. Fibrations over partial flag varieties
5.4. Equivariant projective compactifications
6. Nilpotent Orbits
6.1. Definitions and first results
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 22-02 (primary); 14L30, 14M17, 32M10 (secondary).
1
2
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
7
8
9
9
12
13
15
15
15
15
17
18
19
19
20
21
25
28
28
6.2. The closure order on nilpotent orbits
6.3. The regular nilpotent orbit
6.4. The minimal nilpotent orbit
6.5. Orbit projectivizations
6.6. Orbit closures and singularities
References
29
29
32
33
36
36
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Motivation and objectives. In linear algebra, it is a classical exercise to determine
whether two given matrices, A, B ∈ Matn×n(C), are conjugate, ie. whether B = QAQ−1 for
some invertible Q ∈ Matn×n(C). More generally, one can fix A ∈ Matn×n(C) and consider
the set of all B ∈ Matn×n(C) that are conjugate to A. This set is precisely the conjugacy
class of A, and, as we shall see, it is the paradigm example of a complex adjoint orbit.
Despite this classical motivation, complex adjoint orbits are central to modern research in
algebraic geometry [5, 6, 23, 24, 33, 39, 45], differential geometry [8, 10, 11, 19, 44, 46, 47], Lie
theory [4, 17, 31, 53, 54], and geometric representation theory [12, 16, 38, 55]
This article is an introduction to complex adjoint orbits in algebraic geometry, Lie the-
ory, and, to a lesser extent, the other fields mentioned above. It is written with a view to
meeting several key objectives. Firstly, it should be accessible to a fairly broad mathemat-
ical audience and require only introductory algebraic geometry and Lie theory as prereq-
uisites. Secondly, it aims to build a clear, intuitive, and reasonably self-contained founda-
tion for more advanced topics in which complex adjoint orbits play a role. Thirdly, it is
designed to motivate and outline some of these more advanced topics (ex. hyperkahler
geometry, Landau-Ginzburg models, and symplectic singularities). Our final objective is
to emphasize a few contextually appropriate arguments that, while possibly well-known
to experts, do not seem to appear in the research literature. The arguments in question are
the proofs of Proposition 5.6, Lemma 5.10, Proposition 5.12, Corollary 5.13, Proposition
5.15, Theorem 5.16, and Proposition 6.5. While these are new proofs, at least to the au-
thor's knowledge, we emphasize that the underlying results themselves are well-known.
1.2. Structure of the article. This article is organized as follows. Section 2 addresses
some of the relevant background on actions of complex algebraic groups, focusing largely
on the structure of algebraic group orbits. It includes a number of examples, some of
which are designed to give context and build intuition for later sections. Section 3 subse-
quently discusses a few critical topics in Lie theory. Firstly, in the interest of clarity and
consistency in later sections, 3.1 fixes various objects that arise when one studies represen-
tations of a complex semisimple group (ex. a maximal torus, a Borel subgroup, weights,
roots, etc.). Secondly, 3.2 and 3.3 review the basics of semisimple and nilpotent elements
in a complex semisimple Lie algebra.
Section 4 specializes the previous sections to examine the adjoint orbits of a complex
semisimple group. Adjoint orbits are defined in 4.1, and 4.2 then introduces regular ad-
joint orbits. Next, 4.3 presents some results relating Jordan decompositions to the study
of adjoint orbits. Section 4.4 discusses adjoint orbits in the context of the adjoint quotient,
concluding with some of Kostant's foundational results (see Theorem 4.7). The topics
2
become more manifestly geometric in 4.5, which mentions the role of adjoint orbits in
hyperkahler and holomorphic symplectic geometry.
Section 5 is devoted to semisimple adjoint orbits and their features. These orbits are
introduced in 5.1, where it is also shown that semisimple orbits are exactly the closed
orbits of the adjoint action (see Theorem 5.4). Section 5.2 develops a uniform description
of a semisimple element's stabilizer under the adjoint action of a complex semisimple
group (see Proposition 5.6 and Corollary 5.7). The discussion becomes more esoteric in
Sections 5.3 and 5.4. The former shows semisimple orbits to be explicitly diffeomorphic to
cotangent bundles of partial flag varieties G/P (see Proposition 5.12), which is consistent
with results in hyperkahler geometry (see Remark 5.9). Section 5.4 reviews a procedure
for compactifying semisimple orbits (see Theorem 5.16), and subsequently gives some
context from the homological mirror symmetry program (see Remark 5.17).
Section 6 is exclusively concerned with nilpotent adjoint orbits and their properties. It
begins with 6.1, in which nilpotent orbits are defined and then characterized in several
equivalent ways. Also included is a proof that there are only finitely many nilpotent
orbits of a given complex semisimple group (see Theorem 6.4). Section 6.2 studies the
set of nilpotent orbits as a poset, partially ordered by the closure order. In particular,
it recalls Gerstenhaber and Hesselink's classical description of this poset in Lie type A
(see Example 6.7). Section 6.3 shows there to be a unique maximal element in the poset
of nilpotent orbits (see Proposition 6.8), called the regular nilpotent orbit. We also recall
Kostant's construction of a standard representative for this orbit (see Proposition 6.10).
Next, 6.4 introduces Omin, the minimal (non-zero) nilpotent orbit of a complex simple
group. This leads to a discussion of nilpotent orbit projectivizations in 6.5, where P(Omin)
and its properties are discussed in detail. Some emphasis is placed on the role of P(Omin)
in quaternionic-Kahler geometry. Lastly, 6.6 outlines how nilpotent orbit closures can
arise in geometric representation theory, and in the study of symplectic singularities and
resolutions.
1.3. Acknowledgements. The author is grateful to Roger Bielawski, Steven Rayan, and
Markus R oser for many fruitful discussions, and to the Institute of Differential Geometry
at Leibniz Universitat Hannover for its hospitality.
1.4. General conventions. While many of our conventions will be declared in Sections 2
and 3, the following are some things we can establish in advance.
• We will discuss several objects that, strictly speaking, make sense only when a base
field has been specified (ex. vector spaces, Lie algebras, representations, algebraic
varieties, etc.). Unless we indicate otherwise, we will always take this field to be
C.
• If X is a set with an equivalence relation ∼, then [x] ∈ X/∼ will denote the equiva-
lence class of x ∈ X. The equivalence relations of interest to us will usually come
from the (left) action of a group G on a set X, in which x1 ∼ x2 if and only if x2 = g·x1
for some g ∈ G. In such cases, we will denote the quotient set X/∼ by X/G.
• Many of the spaces we will consider can be viewed both as algebraic varieties with
their Zariski topologies, and as manifolds with their analytic topologies. Accord-
ingly, if one of our statements has topological content, the reader should by de-
fault understand the underlying topology to be the Zariski topology. Only when a
3
space does not have a clear algebraic variety structure (ex. a compact Lie group or
an orbit thereof), or when manifold-theoretic terms are being used (ex. diffeomor-
phism, holomorphic, homotopy-equivalence, equivariant cohomology) should we
be understood as referring to the analytic topology.
2. PRELIMINARIES ON ALGEBRAIC GROUP ACTIONS
In what follows, we review some pertinent concepts from the theory of group actions
on algebraic varieties. This review is designed to serve two principal purposes: to clearly
establish some of our major conventions, and to give motivation/context for what is to
come. However, it is not intended to be a comprehensive overview of algebraic group
actions. For this, we refer the reader to [36, Chapt. II–IV].
2.1. Definitions and examples. Let G be a connected linear algebraic group with Lie
algebraic variety X equipped with an algebraic G-action, namely a variety morphism
(i) e · x = x for all x ∈ X, where e ∈ G is the identity element,
(ii) (g1g2) · x = g1 · (g2 · x) for all g1, g2 ∈ G and x ∈ X.
algebra g and adjoint representation Ad : G → GL(g). By G-variety, we shall mean an
G × X→ X, (g, x) 7→ g · x, satisfying the usual properties of a left G-action:
of algebraic varieties, ie. a variety morphism ϕ : X→ Y satisfying ϕ(g · x) = g · ϕ(x) for
all g ∈ G and x ∈ X. This induces the definition of a G-variety isomorphism, which is
precisely a G-equivariant isomorphism of algebraic varieties.
A morphism of G-varieties is then appropriately defined to be a G-equivariant morphism
The literature contains many examples of G-varieties and related ideas, some of which
we mention below.
Example 2.1. Let G = GLn(C) act by left multiplication on the vector space of n × n ma-
trices Matn×n(C), so that g · A = gA, g ∈ GLn(C), A ∈ Matn×n(C). In this way, Matn×n(C)
is a GLn(C)-variety.
Example 2.2. Alternatively, one has the conjugation action of GLn(C) on Matn×n(C), ie.
g · A = gAg−1, g ∈ GLn(C), A ∈ Matn×n(C). This, too, renders Matn×n(C) a GLn(C)-
variety.
Example 2.3. By a flag in Cn, we shall mean a sequence
V• = ({0} ( V1 ( V2 ( . . . ( Vk ( Cn)
of subspaces of Cn. Now, suppose that d• = (d1, d2, . . . , dk) is a strictly increasing se-
quence of integers with 1 ≤ di ≤ n − 1 for all i = 1, . . . , k. We denote by Flag(d•, Cn) the
set of all flags in Cn whose constituent subspaces have dimensions d1, d2, . . . , dk, namely
Flag(d•; Cn) = {V• : dim(Vi) = di, i = 1, . . . , k}.
This is a smooth projective variety and it carries a GLn(C)-variety structure in which
GLn(C) acts via
g · V• = ({0} ( gV1 ( gV2 ( . . . ( gVk ( Cn),
g ∈ GLn(C), V• ∈ Flag(d•, Cn).
Example 2.4. Let X be a G-variety and H ⊆ G a closed subgroup. One can restrict the G-
structure on X.
action to H in the sense that H × X→ X, (h, x) 7→ h · x, h ∈ H, x ∈ X defines an H-variety
4
Example 2.5. Let X be a G-variety and Y ⊆ X a locally closed subvariety.1 If g · y ∈ Y
for all g ∈ G and y ∈ Y, we will refer to Y as being G-invariant (or simply invariant if the
structure on Y.
action is clear from context). In this case, the map G × Y→ Y, (g, y) 7→ g · y, is a G-variety
Example 2.6. Let X and Y be G-varieties. The product X × Y then carries a canonical
G-variety structure, defined by the "diagonal" G-action
g · (x, y) = (g · x, g · y),
g ∈ G, (x, y) ∈ X × Y.
Example 2.7. Let V be a G-representation, meaning for us that V is a finite-dimensional
G-variety. Note that Examples 2.1 and 2.2 feature G-varieties induced by representations.
Example 2.8. As a counterpart to the last example, one can use G-varieties to induce
the automorphism defined by φg(x) = g · x. Now suppose H ⊆ G is a closed subgroup
and x ∈ X is a point satisfying h · x = x (ie. φh(x) = x) for all h ∈ H. It follows that
vector space together with a morphism of algebraic groups ρ : G → GL(V) (ex. V = g
and ρ = Ad). In this case, the map G × V → V, (g, v) 7→ ρ(g)(v), gives V the structure of a
representations. To this end, let X be a G-variety and for each g ∈ G let φg : X → X be
the differential of φh at x is a vector space automorphism dx(φh) : TxX → TxX of the
tangent space TxX. Furthermore, one can verify that H → GL(TxX), h 7→ dx(φh), is an
Example 2.9. Let ρ : G→ GL(V) be a G-representation, and let P(V) = (V \{0})/C∗ denote
the projectivization of V. The formula g · [v] = [ρ(g)(v)] gives a well-defined action of G
on P(V), rendering the latter a G-variety.
H-representation.
Example 2.10. Let X be an affine G-variety and C[X] the algebra of regular functions on
X. This algebra carries a canonical action of G by algebra automorphisms, in which g ∈ G
acts on f ∈ C[X] by (g · f)(x) := f(g−1 · x), x ∈ X.
Example 2.11. Let H be a closed subgroup of G. The set of left H-cosets X = G/H = {gH :
g ∈ G} is naturally an algebraic variety. Furthermore, when G acts by left multiplication,
G/H is a G-variety.
A few remarks are in order. Firstly, one may summarize Examples 2.7 and 2.9 together
as the statement that a G-representation V induces canonical G-variety structures on both
V and P(V). We will always understand V and P(V) to be G-varieties in exactly this way
when V is a G-representation. Secondly, we shall always view a variety G/H as carrying
the left-multiplicative action of G.
2.2. Generalities on orbits. Let X be a G-variety. One may associate to each point x ∈ X
the subset
(1)
OG(x) := {g · x : g ∈ G},
called the G-orbit of x. Should the underlying group G be clear from context, we will
sometimes suppress it and write O(x) in place of OG(x). Now, let us call O ⊆ X a G-orbit
1Recall that a subset of X is defined to be locally closed if it is expressible as the intersection of an open
and a closed subset of X. Equivalently, a subset is locally closed if and only if the subset is open in its
closure.
5
if O = O(x) for some x ∈ X. In this case, O shall denote the closure of O in X. The orbit O
is open in O (ie. is locally closed), so that O inherits from X the structure of a subvariety.
Furthermore, O is known to be a smooth subvariety of X.
Example 2.12. Let GLn(C) act by left multiplication on Matn×n(C). If A, B ∈ Matn×n(C),
then B = gA for some g ∈ GLn(C) if and only if A and B are equivalent under row
operations, which holds if and only if their reduced echelon forms coincide. It follows that
the GLn(C)-orbits are parametrized by the set of n × n matrices in reduced echelon form.
In particular, the orbit of matrices with reduced echelon form In is O(In) = GLn(C) ⊆
Matn×n(C). This orbit is open and dense.
Example 2.13. Let GLn(C) act by conjugation on Matn×n(C), so that the GLn(C)-orbits are
precisely the conjugacy classes of matrices in Matn×n(C). These classes are indexed by the
equivalence classes of n × n matrices in Jordan canonical form, where two such matrices
are equivalent if they agree up to a reordering of Jordan blocks along the diagonal. To
build some algebro-geometric intuition for these orbits, we specialize to three cases.
• Suppose that A ∈ Matn×n(C) is diagonal with pairwise distinct eigenvalues
λ1, . . . , λn ∈ C. If B ∈ Matn×n(C), then B ∈ O(A) if and only if the characteristic
polynomial of B has the form
det(λIn − B) = (λ − λ1)(λ − λ2) · · · (λ − λn).
Equating corresponding coefficients of λk for each k ∈ {0, 1, . . . , n − 1}, we obtain n
polynomial equations in the entries of B. From this, it follows that O(A) is a closed
(hence affine) subvariety of Matn×n(C).
• Let N1 ∈ Matn×n(C) be the matrix consisting of a single nilpotent Jordan block. If
B ∈ Matn×n(C), then B ∈ O(N1) if and only B has a minimal polynomial of λn, ie.
O(N1) = {B ∈ Matn×n(C) : Bn = 0, Bn−1 6= 0}.
The conditions Bn = 0 and Bn−1 6= 0 define closed and open subsets of Matn×n(C),
respectively, and O(N1) is the intersection of these subsets. We thus see explicitly
that O(N1) is locally closed. Also, one can show that O(N1) = {B ∈ Matn×n(C) :
Bn = 0}, the locus of all nilpotent matrices.
• Let N2 ∈ Matn×n(C) be a nilpotent matrix in Jordan canonical form having a single
2 × 2 Jordan block and all remaining blocks of dimension 1 × 1. To describe O(N2),
note that the Jordan canonical form of a nilpotent B ∈ Matn×n(C) has only 1 × 1
and 2 × 2 blocks if and only if B2 = 0. To ensure the existence of exactly one 2 × 2
block, one must impose the condition rank(B) = 1. Equivalently, one requires that
B 6= 0 and that all 2 × 2 minors of B vanish. It follows that
O(N2) = {B ∈ Matn×n(C) : B2 = 0, rank(B) = 1}
= {B ∈ Matn×n(C) : B2 = 0, every 2 × 2 minor of B = 0, B 6= 0}.
As with O(N1), we explicitly see that O(N2) is the intersection of a closed subset of
Matn×n(C) (defined by B2 = 0 and the vanishing of the 2 × 2 minors) with an open
subset (defined by B 6= 0). Furthermore, it is not difficult to see that 0 ∈ O(N2),
and that O(N2) ∪ {0} is the closed subset mentioned in the previous sentence. We
conclude that O(N2) = O(N2) ∪ {0}.
6
Example 2.14. Refer to Example 2.3, in which GLn(C) acts on Flag(d•; Cn). One can verify
that this action is transitive, so that Flag(d•; Cn) is the unique GLn(C)-orbit. However, let
us restrict the GLn(C)-action to the Borel subgroup B of upper-triangular matrices. To
describe the B-orbits, let w ∈ Sn be a permutation and consider the point
k ( Cn) ∈ Flag(d•; Cn),
• := ({0} ( V w
V w
1 ( V w
2 ( . . . ( V w
:= span{ew(1), ew(2), . . . , ew(di)}, i ∈ {1, 2, . . . , k}. It turns out that w 7→ OB(V w
where V w
• ) is
i
a surjection from Sn to the collection of B-orbits. Furthermore, OB(V w
• ) is isomorphic to
affine space and called a Schubert cell, alluding to the fact that the B-orbits constitute a cell
decomposition of Flag(d•; Cn). The B-orbit closures are the well-studied Schubert varieties.
For further details in this direction, we refer the reader to [25, Chapt. 10].
2.3. Orbits as quotient varieties. Let X be a G-variety and O ⊆ X an orbit. Since O is
locally closed and G-invariant, it inherits from X the structure of a G-variety (cf. Example
2.5). To better understand this structure, fix a point x ∈ O and consider its G-stabilizer
(2)
CG(x) := {g ∈ G : g · x = x}.
This is a closed subgroup of G and one has a well-defined G-variety isomorphism
(3)
G/CG(x)
Note that (3) is just the Orbit-Stabilizer Theorem in an algebro-geometric context.
One can use (3) to yield a convenient description of the tangent space TxO. Indeed, since
(3) sends the identity coset [e] ∈ G/CG(x) to x, it determines an isomorphism of tangent
spaces,
∼=−→ O,
[g] 7→ g · x.
(4)
T[e](G/CG(x))
Also, the differential of G→ G/CG(x) at e ∈ G is surjective with kernel the Lie algebra of
CG(x). Let us denote this Lie algebra by Cg(x), so that we have T[e](G/CG(x)) ∼= g/Cg(x)
as vector spaces. The isomorphism (4) then takes the form
∼=−→ TxO.
(5)
TxO ∼= g/Cg(x).
It turns out that (5) is more than an isomorphism of vector spaces. To see this, note
that TxO is a CG(x)-representation by virtue of x being fixed by CG(x) (see Example 2.8).
At the same time, g carries the adjoint representation of G, and one can restrict this to a
representation of CG(x). One notes that Cg(x) is a CG(x)-invariant subspace, making the
quotient g/Cg(x) a CG(x)-representation. With this discussion in mind, one can verify that
(5) is actually an isomorphism of CG(x)-representations.
Example 2.15. Recall the action of GLn(C) on Flags(d•; Cn) from Example 2.3. Following
the notation of Example 2.14, the GLn(C)-stabilizer of the flag V e
• is
CGLn(C)(V e
• ) = {(Aij) ∈ GLn(C) : Aij = 0 for all r ∈ {1, . . . , k}, i > dr, j ∈ {dr−1, . . . , dr}}.
More simply, a matrix A ∈ GLn(C) is in CGLn(C)(V e
• ) if and only if it is block upper-
triangular with blocks of dimensions d1 × d1, (d2 − d1) × (d2 − d1), . . . , (dk − dk−1) × (dk −
dk−1), (n − dk) × (n − dk) along the diagonal (read from top to bottom). Now, since the
action of GLn(C) on Flags(d•; Cn) can be shown to be transitive, (3) gives an isomorphism
• ) ∼= Flags(d•; Cn).
GLn(C)/CGLn(C)(V e
7
Example 2.16. Recall Example 2.13, and let A, N1 ∈ Matn×n(C) be as introduced there.
One can verify that CGLn(C)(A) is the maximal torus of diagonal matrices in GLn(C), while
CGLn(C)(N1) can be seen to have the following description:
CGLn(C)(N1) = {(Bij) ∈ GLn(C) : Bij = 0 for i > j, Bij = B(i+1)(j+1) for 1 ≤ i ≤ j ≤ n − 1}.
In other words, a matrix B ∈ GLn(C) is in CGLn(C)(N1) if and only if B is upper-triangular
and any two entires of B lying on the same diagonal must be equal. Now, let U ⊆
CGLn(C)(N1) be the unipotent subgroup of matrices having only 1 along the main diag-
onal. This subgroup is complementary to the centre Z(GLn(C)), and one has an internal
direct product decomposition CGLn(C)(N1) = Z(GLn(C)) × U.
2.4. The closure order. The set of orbits in a G-variety X turns out to have a canonical
partial order, based fundamentally on the following proposition.
Proposition 2.17. If O ⊆ X is a G-orbit, then O is a union of O and orbits having dimensions
strictly less than dim(O).
Proof. Choose x ∈ O and note that O is the image of the morphism G→ X, g 7→ g · x. Since
G is irreducible, so too is the image O. It follows that O is also irreducible. Appealing to
the fact that O is locally closed (ie. open in O), we see that O \ O is a closed subvariety
of O, each of whose irreducible components then necessarily has dimension strictly less
than dim(O) = dim(O) (see [36, Sect. 3.2]). Of course, as O \ O is G-invariant, it is a union
of G-orbits. Each of these orbits is also irreducible and therefore has dimension at most
that of an irreducible component of O \ O to which it belongs. Our previous discussion
implies that the dimension of such an orbit is strictly less than dim(O).
(cid:3)
Proposition 2 implies that each G-orbit O is the unique orbit in O having dimension
dim(O). With this in mind, suppose that O1, O2 ⊆ X are G-orbits satisfying O1 ⊆ O2 and
O2 ⊆ O1. These inclusions show O1 and O2 to have the same dimension. Since both orbits
lie in O1, it follows that O1 = O2 must hold. It is thus not difficult to see that
(6)
O1 ≤ O2⇐⇒ O1 ⊆ O2
defines a partial order on the set of G-orbits in X, which we shall call the closure order.
Example 2.18. Recall the setup of Example 2.13, in which GLn(C) acts by conjugation
on Matn×n(C) and A, N1, N2 ∈ Matn×n(C) are three fixed matrices. Having shown O(A)
to be closed in Matn×n(C), we see that O(A) is a minimal element in the closure order.
Secondly, remembering that O(N1) is the locus of all nilpotent n × n matrices, the G-
orbits in O(N1) are the conjugacy classes of nilpotent matrices. These conjugacy classes
are therefore precisely the orbits O ⊆ Matn×n(C) satisfying O ≤ O(N1). Finally, having
seen in Example 2.13 that O(N2) = O(N2) ∪ {0}, we conclude that {0} and O(N2) are the
unique orbits O satisfying O ≤ O(N2).
Example 2.19. Refer to Examples 2.3 and 2.14, where GLn(C) and its subgroup B act on
• ) is a
bijection from Sn to the set of B-orbits. The latter set has the closure order, and there is a
unique partial order on Sn for which our bijection is a poset isomorphism. One thereby
obtains the well-studied Bruhat order on Sn, which we now describe. Given i ∈ {1, . . . , n −
Flag(d•; Cn). We will assume that d• = (1, 2, . . . , n − 1), in which case w 7→ OB(V w
8
1}, let si ∈ Sn be the transposition interchanging i and i + 1. The n − 1 transpositions si
generate Sn, so that each w ∈ Sn has an expression w = si1si2 · · · sik. One calls such an
expression reduced if its length k is minimal. Now given v, w ∈ Sn, the Bruhat order is
defined as follows: v ≤ w if whenever w = si1si2 · · · sik is a reduced expression for w, it is
possible to delete some of the sij so that the resulting expression is a reduced expression
for v.
3. PRELIMINARIES ON LIE THEORY
The following is a brief review of Lie-theoretic topics central to this article, with a strong
emphasis on the structure of semisimple algebraic groups and their Lie algebras. Like the
previous section, this review is more concerned with establishing clear conventions than
being comprehensive. References for the relevant Lie theory include [36, Chapt. III–VIII]
and [57, Chapt. 20–29].
3.1. The basic objects. In what follows, we introduce several Lie-theoretic objects to be
understood as fixed for the rest of this article. To begin, let G be a connected, simply-
connected semisimple linear algebraic group having Lie algebra g and exponential map
exp : g→ G. Let
and
Ad : G→ GL(g),
ad : g→ gl(g),
g 7→ Adg, g ∈ G
x 7→ adx, x ∈ g
denote the adjoint representations of G and g, respectively. Recall that Adg is a Lie algebra
automorphism of g for all g ∈ G, a fact we will use repeatedly. Note also that adx(y) =
[x, y] for all x, y ∈ g, from which it follows that the kernel of ad is the centre of g. This
centre is trivial by virtue of the fact that g is semisimple. In other words, ad is injective.
Now, suppose that T ⊆ B ⊆ G, with T a maximal torus of G and B a Borel subgroup
of G. One then has inclusions t ⊆ b ⊆ g, where t and b are the Lie algebras of T and B,
respectively. Let X∗(T ) be the additive group of weights (ie. algebraic group morphisms
T → C∗), with the sum of λ1, λ2 ∈ X∗(T ) defined by (λ1 + λ2)(t) = λ1(t)λ2(t) for all t ∈ T .
The map sending λ ∈ X∗(T ) to its differential at the identity e ∈ T includes X∗(T ) into t∗ as
an additive subgroup. Where appropriate, we will use this inclusion to regard a weight
as belonging to t∗.
Given a weight α ∈ X∗(T ), let us set
If we regard α as belonging to t∗, then gα admits the following alternative description:
gα := {x ∈ g : Adt(x) = α(t)x for all t ∈ T }.
gα = {x ∈ g : adh(x) = α(h)x for all h ∈ t}.
One knows that g0 = t, while any non-zero weight α satisfying gα 6= {0} is called a root.
In this case, gα is one-dimensional and called a root space. Furthermore, letting ∆ ⊆ X∗(T )
denote the set of roots, we have the following decomposition of g:
(7)
g = t ⊕Mα∈∆
gα.
9
One can check that [gα, gβ] ⊆ gα+β for all α, β ∈ ∆. In particular, if α + β is neither zero
nor a root, then [gα, gβ] = {0}.
Our choice of B gives rise to several distinguished subsets of ∆. The positive roots ∆+
are those α ∈ ∆ for which gα ⊆ b, so that
b = t ⊕ Mα∈∆+
gα.
The negative roots ∆− ⊆ ∆ are defined by negating the positive roots, ie. ∆− := −∆+. We
then have a disjoint union ∆ = ∆+ ∪ ∆−. Finally, the simple roots Π ⊆ ∆ are positive roots
with the property that every β ∈ ∆ can be written as
(8)
(9)
β =Xα∈Π
cαα
β ≤ γ⇐⇒ γ − β =Xα∈Π
cαα
for unique coefficients cα ∈ Z. These coefficients are either all non-negative (in which
case β ∈ ∆+) or all non-positive (in which case β ∈ ∆−). Furthermore, the simple roots
are known to form a basis of t∗.
It will be beneficial to note that the weight lattice carries a particular partial order, de-
fined in terms of the simple roots. Given β, γ ∈ X∗(T ), one has
for some strictly non-negative integers cα ∈ Z.
called the Killing form and defined by
The Lie algebra g carries a distinguished symmetric bilinear form h·, ·i : g ⊗ g → C,
hx, yi := tr(adx ◦ ady),
x, y ∈ g.
This form is G-invariant in the sense that hAdg(x), Adg(y)i = hx, yi for all g ∈ G and
x, y ∈ g. Furthermore, the Killing form is non-degenerate both on g and when restricted
to a bilinear form on t. This non-degeneracy gives rise to vector space isomorphisms
g ∼= g∗ and t ∼= t∗, under which the Killing form corresponds to bilinear forms on g∗
and t∗, respectively. In an abuse of notation, we will also use h·, ·i to denote these forms.
Each simple root α ∈ Π then determines a simple coroot hα ∈ t, defined by the following
property:
φ(hα) = 2
hα, φi
hα, αi
for all φ ∈ t∗. One can check that hα ∈ [gα, g−α] and that the simple coroots form a basis
of t.
Now let W := NG(T )/T be the Weyl group and sα ∈ W the reflection associated to
α ∈ ∆, so that W is generated by the simple reflections sα, α ∈ Π. Note that W acts on t
by w · x = Adg(x), w ∈ W, x ∈ t, where g ∈ NG(T ) is any representative of w. There is an
induced action on t∗ defined by
(w · φ)(x) = φ(w−1 · x), w ∈ W, φ ∈ t∗, x ∈ t,
under which the reflections act as follows:
sα · φ = φ − 2
hα, φi
hα, αi
α, α ∈ ∆, φ ∈ t∗.
It is known that X∗(T ) and ∆ are invariant under this W-action.
10
Now recall that a closed subgroup P ⊆ G is called parabolic if P contains a conjugate
of B. If P contains B itself, one calls it a standard parabolic subgroup. To construct such a
subgroup, consider a subset S ⊆ Π and let ∆S (resp. ∆+
S ) denote the collection of roots
(resp. positive roots, negative roots) expressible as Z-linear combinations of the elements
of S. It follows that
S , ∆−
(10)
pS := b ⊕ Mα∈∆−
S
gα
is a Lie subalgebra of g, and we shall let PS ⊆ G denote the corresponding closed con-
nected subgroup of G. Note that PS contains B, by construction. Moreover, it turns out
that S 7→ PS defines a bijective correspondence between the subsets of Π and the standard
parabolic subgroups of G. The inverse associates to a standard parabolic subgroup P the
subset ΠP := {α ∈ Π : g−α ⊆ p}, where p is the Lie algebra of P.
We will later benefit from recalling a particular Levi decomposition of a standard para-
bolic subgroup PS (cf. [36, Sect. 30.2]). One has
(11)
PS = US ⋊ LS,
where US is the unipotent radical of PS and LS is a (reductive) Levi factor having Lie
algebra
(12)
lS := t ⊕ Mα∈∆S
The Lie algebra of US is
(13)
⊕ t ⊕
Mα∈∆+
S
gα
.
S
gα
gα =
Mα∈∆−
uS := Mα∈∆+\∆+
gα.
S
We now specialize some of the above Lie-theoretic generalities to the case of G =
SLn(C), a recurring example in this article.
Example 3.1. Let G = SLn(C), whose Lie algebra is g = sln(C) = {x ∈ gln(C) : tr(x) = 0}
with Lie bracket the commutator of matrices. The adjoint representations are given by
(14)
Adg(x) = gxg−1,
adx(y) = [x, y] = xy − yx
for all g ∈ SLn(C) and x, y ∈ sln(C). Also, the Killing form h·, ·i is given by
(15)
hx, yi = 2n tr(xy),
x, y ∈ sln(C).
One may take T and B to be the subgroups of diagonal and upper-triangular matrices in
SLn(C), respectively. It follows that t and b are the Lie subalgebras of diagonal and upper-
triangular matrices in sln(C), respectively. Now, for each i ∈ {1, . . . , n}, let ti ∈ X∗(T ) be
the weight defined by
ti : T → C∗,
a1
0
0 a2
...
...
0
0
11
. . .
0
. . .
0
...
. . .
. . . an
7→ ai.
: 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n},
We then have ∆ = {ti − tj
∆− = {ti − tj : 1 ≤ j < i ≤ n}, and Π = {ti − ti+1 : 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1}. If α = ti − tj ∈ ∆, then
sln(C)α = spanC{Eij} where Eij ∈ sln(C) has an entry of 1 in position (i, j) and 0 elsewhere.
Recall that the Weyl group identifies with Sn in such a way that w ∈ Sn acts on h ∈ t by
: 1 ≤ i, j ≤ n, i 6= j}, ∆+ = {ti − tj
permuting entries along the diagonal.
3.2. Semisimple and nilpotent elements. It will be prudent to recall some of the funda-
mentals concerning semisimple and nilpotent elements in g. We begin with the official,
Lie-theoretic definitions of these terms.
(resp. nilpotent) as a vector space endomorphism.
Definition 3.2. We call a point x ∈ g semisimple (resp. nilpotent) if adx : g→ g is semisimple
At first glance, there might appear to be other legitimate definitions. Suppose, for in-
stance, that g is explicitly presented as a subalgebra of gln(C) for some n. Elements of g
are then n×n matrices, and one has the usual notions of "semisimple" and "nilpotent" for
square matrices. Fortunately, these turn out to coincide with Definition 3.2 (see [57, Cor.
20.4.3]).
Theorem 3.3. If g is a subalgebra of gln(C), then x ∈ g is semisimple (resp. nilpotent) in the
sense of Definition 3.2 if and only if x is semisimple (resp. nilpotent) as a matrix.
Example 3.4. Suppose that G = SL2(C), whose Lie algebra g = sl2(C) has the usual
generators
(16)
X =(cid:20)0 1
0 0(cid:21) , H =(cid:20)1
0
0 −1(cid:21) ,
Y =(cid:20)0 0
1 0(cid:21) .
By Theorem 3.3, it is immediate that H is a semisimple element of sl2(C), while X and
Y are nilpotent elements. The algebra sl2(C) and triple of elements (X, H, Y) will play a
substantial role in 3.3.
The relationship between semisimple (resp. nilpotent) elements of g and semisimple
(resp. nilpotent) matrices extends beyond Theorem 3.3. For instance, recall that if an
n × n matrix is both semisimple and nilpotent, it is necessarily zero. At the same time, if
x ∈ g is both semisimple and nilpotent, so too is the endomorphism adx : g→ g. It follows
that adx = 0, and the injectivity of ad : g→ gl(g) implies x = 0. For a second comparison,
tent) if and only if there exists g ∈ G satisfying Adg(x) ∈ t (resp. Adg(x) ∈ Lα∈∆+
note that an n × n matrix is semisimple (resp. nilpotent) if and only if it is conjugate to a
diagonal (resp. strictly upper-triangular) matrix. Dually, x ∈ g is semisimple (resp. nilpo-
gα).
Thirdly, one knows that every n × n matrix A gives rise to unique n × n matrices S and N
such that S is semisimple, N is nilpotent, A = S + N, and SN − NS = 0. The analogous fact
is that for every x ∈ g, there exist unique elements xs, xn ∈ g for which xs is semisimple,
xn is nilpotent, x = xs + xn, and [xs, xn] = 0. The expression x = xs + xn is called the
Jordan decomposition of x, while xs and xn are called the semisimple and nilpotent parts of
x, respectively.
Let us turn to a more geometric discussion. Denote by gss and N the subsets of semisim-
ple and nilpotent elements of g, respectively. The latter is called the nilpotent cone, in ref-
erence to the fact that N is invariant under the dilation action of C∗ on g. In the interest of
12
preparing for later sections of this article, let us mention a few preliminary facts concern-
ing gss and N. Firstly, since the semisimple endomorphisms are open and dense in gl(g), it
follows that gss is an open dense subvariety of g. One analogously sees that N is a closed
subvariety of g. Secondly, noting that Adg is a Lie algebra automorphism for each g ∈ G,
we conclude that x ∈ g is semisimple (resp. nilpotent) if and only if Adg(x) is semisimple
(resp. nilpotent). This is equivalent to the observation that both gss and N are invariant
under the adjoint representation.
Example 3.5. Let G = SL2(C). By Theorem 3.3, A ∈ sl2(C) is nilpotent if and only if it is
nilpotent as a matrix. Equivalently, the characteristic polynomial det(λI2 − A) is λ2, which
is the case if and only if det(A) = 0 (the condition tr(A) = 0 being automatic). In other
words, we have
N =(cid:12)(cid:20)x y
z −x(cid:21) ∈ sl2(C) : x2 + yz = 0(cid:13) .
3.3. The Jacobson-Morozov Theorem and sl2(C)-triples. Let (X, H, Y) be the triple of
matrices in sl2(C) from Example 3.4. These matrices form a C-basis of sl2(C) and satisfy
the following bracket relations:
(17)
[X, Y] = H,
[H, X] = 2X,
[H, Y] = −2Y.
More generally, one calls a triple (x, h, y) of points in g an sl2(C)-triple if (17) holds in
g when X, H, and Y are replaced with x, h, and y, respectively. Such triples are in
bijective correspondence with the Lie algebra morphisms φ : sl2(C) → g, where φ ∈
Hom(sl2(C), g) identifies with (φ(X), φ(H), φ(Y)). Since any φ ∈ Hom(sl2(C), g) is either
zero or injective (a consequence of sl2(C) having no non-trivial ideals), there are exactly
two possibilities for an sl2(C)-triple (x, h, y). Either x = h = y = 0 or spanC{x, h, y} is a
subalgebra of g isomorphic to sl2(C).
Example 3.6. Let α ∈ Π be a simple root and hα ∈ [gα, g−α] the corresponding simple
coroot (as defined in 3.1). If eα ∈ gα and e−α ∈ g−α are chosen so that hα = [eα, e−α], then
one can show (eα, hα, e−α) to be an sl2(C)-triple.
Example 3.7. In the interest of preparing for discussions to come (particularly 6.3), we
now consider a more complicated example (cf. [42, Lemma 5.2]). To this end, since Π is a
basis of t∗, we may define {ǫα}α∈Π to be the basis of t satisfying
(18)
α(ǫβ) =(cid:14)2
0
if α = β
if α 6= β
for all α, β ∈ Π. Now consider the semisimple element
(19)
h :=Xα∈Π
ǫα ∈ t.
Noting that {hα}α∈Π is a basis of t (see 3.1), there exist unique coefficients cα ∈ C, α ∈ Π,
such that
h =Xα∈Π
13
cαhα.
We now define ξ, η ∈ g by
and
eα
ξ :=Xα∈Π
η :=Xα∈Π
cαe−α,
respectively, where for each α ∈ Π, eα ∈ gα and e−α ∈ g−α are chosen such that hα =
[eα, e−α] (as in Example 3.6). Furthermore, we claim that (ξ, h, η) is an sl2(C)-triple. To see
this, first note that
(20)
[ξ, η] = Xα,β∈Π
cβ[eα, e−β].
If α, β ∈ Π are distinct, then the discussion of simple roots in 3.1 implies that α − β cannot
be a root. Since α − β is also non-zero in this case, [gα, g−β] = {0} (see 3.1). In particular,
[eα, e−β] = 0 when α and β are distinct. At the same time, we know that [eα, e−α] = hα for
all α ∈ Π. Hence (20) can be written as
Now computing [h, ξ], we have
[ξ, η] =Xα∈Π
cαhα = h.
[h, ξ] =Xα∈Π
[h, eα] =Xα∈Π
α(h)eα.
The description (19) of h implies that α(h) = 2 for all α ∈ Π, so that
[h, ξ] =Xα∈Π
2eα = 2ξ.
The verification of [h, η] = −2η is similar, since −α(h) = −2 for all α ∈ Π. It follows that
(ξ, h, η) is indeed an sl2(C)-triple.
We will benefit from understanding sl2(C)-triples in the context of the Jacobson-Morozov
Theorem, a crucial result that will feature prominently in 4.3. To motivate this theorem,
suppose that (x, h, y) is the sl2(C)-triple corresponding to a non-zero (ie. injective) φ ∈
Hom(sl2(C), g). It follows that φ defines an isomorphism with its image spanC{x, h, y},
so that φ sends nilpotent elements of sl2(C) to nilpotent elements of spanC{x, h, y}. In
particular, x = φ(X) is nilpotent in spanC{x, h, y}. If one chooses a Lie algebra embedding
g ⊆ gln(C)2, then spanC{x, h, y} becomes a subalgebra of gln(C) and Theorem 3.3 implies
that x is nilpotent matrix. By applying Theorem 3.3 again, this time to the subalgebra
g ⊆ gln(C), we see that x is nilpotent in g. This is clearly also true when φ = 0 (in which
case x = 0), so we have shown x ∈ g to be nilpotent whenever it appears as the first
element in an sl2(C)-triple. For a converse, one has the Jacobson-Morozov Theorem.
Theorem 3.8 (The Jacobson-Morozov Theorem; cf. [16, Thm. 3.7.1]). If x ∈ g is nilpotent,
then there exist h, y ∈ g such that (x, h, y) is an sl2(C)-triple.
2Since g is semisimple, such an embedding always exists. For instance, one may identify g with its image
under the (injective) adjoint representation ad : g→ gl(g) ∼= gln(C), n = dim(g).
14
4. GENERAL ADJOINT ORBITS
Equipped with Section 3, we can apply parts of Section 2 to study a distinguished
class of algebraic group orbits – adjoint orbits. Our overarching objective is to give the
background and context necessary for the more specialized discussions of semisimple
and nilpotent adjoint orbits (Sections 5 and 6, respectively). Nevertheless, we will see
that general adjoint orbits are interesting objects of study in Lie theory and geometry (see
4.5, for example).
4.1. Definitions and conventions. Following the framework of Example 2.7, the adjoint
action the adjoint action and its orbits adjoint orbits.
representation Ad : G→ GL(g) induces a G-variety structure on g. One calls the resulting
Example 4.1. Let G = SLn(C). Referring to (14), we see that the adjoint orbits of SLn(C)
are precisely the conjugacy classes of the traceless n × n matrices. Note that the term
"conjugacy class" is unambiguous, since two n × n matrices are conjugate under SLn(C)
if and only if they are conjugate under GLn(C). With this point in mind, Example 2.13
describes several adjoint SLn(C)-orbits.3
Now, recall the discussion of stabilizers from 2.3. Given x ∈ g, we shall always under-
stand CG(x) as referring to the G-stabilizer of x under the adjoint action, ie.
CG(x) := {g ∈ G : Adg(x) = x},
x ∈ g.
The following fact about its Lie algebra, Cg(x) ⊆ g, will be used repeatedly and (in the
interest of parsimony) without explicit indication that it is being used.
Lemma 4.2 (cf. [38, Sect. 2.2]). If x ∈ g, then Cg(x) = {y ∈ g : [x, y] = 0}.
4.2. Dimension and regularity. In the interest of later sections, we now take a moment
to discuss the dimensions of adjoint orbits. One might begin with the observation that
each adjoint orbit can have dimension at most dim(G). However, this dimension bound
turns out to be highly sub-optimal. To improve it, we note that dim(CG(x)) ≥ rank(G) for
all x ∈ g (see [57, Sect. 19.7, Sect. 29.3]4). It follows that
dim(O(x)) = dim(G/CG(x)) = dim(G) − dim(CG(x)) ≤ dim(G) − rank(G)
for all x ∈ g, so that dim(G) − rank(G) is our new upper bound on adjoint orbit dimen-
sions. This bound is sharp in the sense that g always contains adjoint orbits of dimension
dim(G) − rank(G). We defer the proof of this fact to 5.2 (see Corollary 5.8), which is
completely independent of the present section.
One calls an adjoint orbit O ⊆ g regular if dim(O) = dim(G) − rank(G).
4.3. Some first results. We now gather some initial results on adjoint orbits, emphasizing
connections to semisimple/nilpotent elements and the Jordan decomposition (discussed
in 3.2). The facts we establish here will be essential to Sections 5 and 6.
3To ensure that O(A) from Example 2.13 is an adjoint SLn(C)-orbit, one must impose the extra condition
tr(A) = 0.
4Strictly speaking, this reference bounds the dimension of Cg(x) instead of CG(x). This is, of course,
equivalent to the dimension inequality stated here.
15
Proposition 4.3. If O ⊆ g is an adjoint orbit and x ∈ O has Jordan decomposition x = xs + xn,
then xs + axn ∈ O for all a ∈ C∗.
Proof. Since [xs, xn] = 0, it follows that xn ∈ Cg(xs). However, Cg(xs) is known to be a
reductive subalgebra of g (see [57, Prop. 20.5.13]), and one can then deduce that xn ∈
[Cg(xs), Cg(xs)] (see [57, Prop. 20.5.14]). Also, the fact that [Cg(xs), Cg(xs)] is reductive
implies that [Cg(xs), Cg(xs)] is a semisimple subalgebra. The element xn is nilpotent in
[Cg(xs), Cg(xs)], as one can see by embedding g (hence also [Cg(xs), Cg(xs)]) into gln(C) and
applying Theorem 3.3. By the Jacobson-Morozov Theorem, there exists h ∈ [Cg(xs), Cg(xs)]
for which [h, xn] = 2xn. Now for all c ∈ C, we have
(21)
Adexp(ch)(x) = exp(adch)(x) = exp(adch)(xs) + exp(adch)(xn)
where exp(adch) denotes the exponential of the endomorphism adch : g → g. Observe
that ch ∈ Cg(xs), so that exp(adch)(xs) = xs. Secondly, the condition [ch, xn] = 2cxn gives
exp(adch)(xn) = e2cxn. These two observations allow one to write (21) as
Adexp(ch)(x) = xs + e2cxn.
In particular, xs + e2cxn ∈ O for all c ∈ C. To prove the proposition as stated, choose c ∈ C
such that e2c = a.
(cid:3)
By letting a→ 0 in Proposition 4.3, one obtains the following corollary.
Corollary 4.4. If O ⊆ g is an adjoint orbit and x ∈ O has Jordan decomposition x = xs + xn,
then xs ∈ O.
Our next results will make extensive use of G-invariant polynomials on g. To be more
precise, note that the adjoint action induces an action of G on C[g] (cf. Example 2.10), the
algebra of regular (ie. polynomial) functions on g. Let C[g]G ⊆ C[g] denote the subalgebra
of all G-invariant polynomial functions, meaning
C[g]G := {f ∈ C[g] : g · f = f for all g ∈ G}.
Analogously, the W-action on t (see 3.1) gives rise to a W-action on the polynomial func-
tions C[t], and to a subalgebra C[t]W ⊆ C[t] of W-invariant polynomial functions. One can
verify that G-invariant polynomials on g restrict to W-invariant polynomials on t, and it
turns out that this restriction process defines an algebra isomorphism
(22)
(see [16, Thm. 3.1.38]). Moreover, C[g]G (hence also C[t]W) is known to be freely generated
as a commutative C-algebra by r = rank(G) homogeneous polynomials (see [43, Sect.
3.3]).
C[g]G
∼=−→ C[t]W
Proposition 4.5. If x, y ∈ g are semisimple, then O(x) = O(y) if and only if f(x) = f(y) for all
f ∈ C[g]G.
Proof. If O(x) = O(y), then y = Adg(x) for some g ∈ G and f(y) = f(Adg(x)) = f(x)
for all f ∈ C[g]G. Conversely, suppose that f(x) = f(y) for all f ∈ C[g]G. Since x and y
are semisimple, there exist hx, hy ∈ t such that O(hx) = O(x) and O(hy) = O(y) (see the
discussion in 3.2). Also, repeating the argument from the first sentence of our proof, we
see f(hx) = f(x) and f(hy) = f(y) for all f ∈ C[g]G. We may therefore assume that x, y ∈ t
16
when proving our converse. It then follows from (22) that f(x) = f(y) for all f ∈ C[t]W.
Using Lemma 34.2.1 of [57], we conclude that y = w · x for some w ∈ W. After lifting w to
a representative g ∈ NG(T ), this statement becomes y = Adg(x). Hence O(x) = O(y). (cid:3)
Focusing now on nilpotent elements and adjoint orbits, we have the following.
Proposition 4.6. If x ∈ g, then the following conditions are equivalent.
(i) x is nilpotent.
(ii) For all a ∈ C∗, ax ∈ O(x).
(iii) 0 ∈ O(x).
(iv) For all f ∈ C[g]G, f(x) = f(0).
4.3.
Proof. We will verify the implications (i)⇒(ii)⇒(iii)⇒(iv)⇒(i).
(i)⇒(ii): Note that xs = 0 and xn = x, so that (ii) follows immediately from Proposition
(ii)⇒(iii): Since ax ∈ O(x) for all a ∈ C∗, letting a→ 0 establishes that 0 ∈ O(x).
(iii)⇒(iv): If f ∈ C[g]G, then f(Adg(x)) = f(x) for all g ∈ G. In other words, f takes the
(iv)⇒(i): For each positive integer n, consider the function φn ∈ C[g] defined by φn(y) =
tr((ady)n). To see that φn ∈ C[g]G, suppose that g ∈ G and y, z ∈ g. We have adAdg(y)(z) =
[Adg(y), z] = Adg([y, (Adg)−1(z)]), meaning that adAdg(y) = Adg ◦ ady ◦(Adg)−1. Hence,
constant value f(x) on O(x). By continuity, f actually takes the constant value f(x) on
O(x). Since 0 ∈ O(x), we see that f(x) = f(0).
φn(Adg(y)) = tr((adAdg(y))n) = tr(Adg ◦(ady)n ◦ (Adg)−1) = tr((ady)n) = φn(y),
and we conclude that φn ∈ C[g]G. Now by hypothesis,
tr((adx)n) = φn(x) = φn(0) = 0
for all positive integers n. It follows that adx is a nilpotent endomorphism, as desired. (cid:3)
4.4. The adjoint quotient. Adjoint orbits feature prominently in a very natural and well-
studied fibration whose total space is g. To construct it, one can appeal to the basics of
surjective map of affine varieties,
geometric invariant theory. The inclusion C[g]G ֒→ C[g] corresponds to a G-invariant
(23)
(see [51, Sect. 1.4.1, Sect. 1.4.2]), called the adjoint quotient. Note Spec(C[g]G) refers to the
maximal ideal spectrum of C[g]G, while G-invariance is the condition that φ ◦ Adg = φ
for all g ∈ G.
Φ : g→ Spec(C[g]G),
One can say a great deal more about (23) by invoking the discussion of C[g]G in 4.3.
Indeed, recall that C[g]G is freely generated by r := rank(G) homogeneous generators,
χ1, χ2, . . . , χr ∈ C[g]G. We may therefore identify Spec(C[g]G) with Cr and re-write Φ as
the map
(24)
Φ : g→ Cr,
ξ 7→ (χ1(ξ), χ2(ξ), . . . , χr(ξ)).
Kostant studied this form of the adjoint quotient in detail (see [43]). More specifically, note
that the G-invariance of Φ is equivalent to each fibre of Φ being a union of adjoint orbits.
With this in mind, Kostant gave the following description of each fibre's decomposition
into adjoint orbits (see [43, Thm. 0.6, Thm. 0.7]).
17
Theorem 4.7. If z ∈ Spec(C[g]G), then Φ−1(z) is a union of finitely many adjoint orbits and
contains a unique regular orbit. This regular orbit is open and dense in Φ−1(z).
Corollary 4.8. If O ⊆ g is an adjoint orbit, then O is a union of finitely many adjoint orbits.
Proof. Choose a point x ∈ O. Since the fibres of Φ are G-invariant, it follows that O belongs
to Φ−1(Φ(x)). This fibre is closed, meaning that O ⊆ Φ−1(Φ(x)). Theorem 4.7 implies that
Φ−1(Φ(x)) is a union of finitely many adjoint orbits, so that the same must be true of
O.
(cid:3)
4.5. Geometric features. We now turn our attention to some more inherently geometric
aspects of adjoint orbits. However, to avoid the lengthy digressions needed to properly
motivate certain definitions, we will sometimes not define the geometric structures un-
der consideration (ex. Poisson and hyperkahler structures). In such cases, we will give
suitable references to the research literature.
Consider the coadjoint representation Ad∗ : G→ GL(g∗), g 7→ Ad∗
g(φ))(x) := φ(Adg−1(x)),
g ∈ G, φ ∈ g∗ , x ∈ g.
(Ad∗
g, defined as follows:
This representation gives g∗ the structure of a G-variety, and the resulting orbits are called
coadjoint orbits. Moreover, g∗ is known to carry a canonical holomorphic Poisson structure
whose symplectic leaves are precisely the coadjoint orbits (see [16, Sect. 1.2, 1.3]). It fol-
lows that every coadjoint orbit inherits a holomorphic symplectic form, namely a closed,
non-degenerate, holomorphic 2-form (see [16, Sect. 1.1] for further details on symplectic
forms). One call this particular symplectic form the Kirillov-Kostant-Souriau form.
Now, recall that the Killing form induces a vector space isomorphism g ∼= g∗. Not-
ing that the Killing form is G-invariant (see 3.1), one can verify that our isomorphism is
G-equivariant. Hence, in addition to identifying g with g∗, the isomorphism identifies
adjoint orbits with coadjoint orbits. We may therefore transfer the above-mentioned geo-
metric structures on g∗ and coadjoint orbits to g and adjoint orbits, respectively. The Lie
algebra g then has a canonical holomorphic Poisson structure and its symplectic leaves
are exactly the adjoint orbits. In particular, every adjoint orbit O ⊆ g carries a preferred
holomorphic symplectic form, ωO ∈ Ω2(O). To describe it, fix x ∈ O and identify the
tangent space TxO with g/Cg(x) via (5), so that the restriction of ωO to x is a bilinear form
on g/Cg(x). We then have
(25)
for all [y], [z] ∈ g/Cg(x).
ωOx : g/Cg(x) ⊗ g/Cg(x)→ C, ωOx([y], [z]) := hx, [y, z]i
Thus far, our treatment of adjoint orbits and geometry has been classical. However,
there is a more modern and elaborate framework within which to appreciate the canonical
symplectic forms described above – hyperkahler geometry. It turns out that each adjoint
orbit is a hyperkahler manifold (see [20] for a definition) whose underlying holomorphic
symplectic form is the canonical one we have just described. This result was proved by
Kronheimer [46, 47] in important special cases and by Biquard [11] and Kovalev [44] in
full generality. The key is to identify each adjoint orbit with a certain moduli space of
solutions to Nahm's equations (see [9, Sect. 2.2]), known to be a hyperkahler manifold, and
then transfer the hyperkahler structure over to the orbit. It is nevertheless often difficult
to describe this induced hyperkahler structure in explicit terms (see [9, Sect 2.3]). This is
18
one of several unresolved issues that have made and continue to make the hyperkahler
geometry of adjoint orbits an active area of research (see [8, 10, 19, 41, 58]).
5. SEMISIMPLE ORBITS
Informally speaking, Example 4.1 shows adjoint orbits to be generalizations of matrix
conjugacy classes. In what follows, we will study the adjoint orbits that generalize the
conjugacy classes of diagonalizable matrices – the semisimple orbits.
5.1. Definitions and characterizations. Recall from 3.2 that the subvariety of semisimple
elements gss ⊆ g is invariant under the adjoint representation of G. One may rephrase this
G-invariance in the following way: an adjoint orbit contains a semisimple element if and
only if it consists of semisimple elements. The adjoint orbits satisfying these equivalent
conditions are called the semisimple orbits.
Definition 5.1. An adjoint orbit O ⊆ g is called a semisimple orbit if O ∩ gss 6= ∅, or equiva-
lently O ⊆ gss.
Example 5.2. Let G = SLn(C). Using Example 4.1 and Theorem 3.3, we see that the
semisimple orbits in sln(C) are precisely the conjugacy classes of semisimple (ie. diago-
nalizable) n × n matrices having zero trace.
While we shall take Definition 5.1 to be our definition of a semisimple orbit, there are
alternatives. To motivate one of these, recall that Example 2.13 shows the conjugacy class
of a diagonal n × n matrix with pairwise distinct eigenvalues to be closed in Matn×n(C).
Now suppose that the matrix in question lies in sln(C). Its SLn(C)-adjoint orbit is semisim-
ple (see Example 5.2), and the argument from Example 2.13 shows the orbit to be closed
in sln(C). At the same time, the matrices N1 and N2 from Example 2.13 belong to sln(C).
Their SLn(C)-adjoint orbits are not semisimple (see Example 5.2 again) and the arguments
from Example 2.13 show these orbits to be non-closed in sln(C). Our findings here are an
instance of a general fact: an adjoint orbit is closed if and only if it is semisimple. Before
proving this, we present the following lemma.
Lemma 5.3. If O ⊆ g is an adjoint orbit, then there exists a unique semisimple orbit belonging to
O.
Proof. Choose a point x ∈ O. For existence, Corollary 4.4 implies that xs ∈ O. It follows
that O(xs) is a semisimple orbit lying in O. As for uniqueness, suppose that f ∈ C[g]G.
Since f(Adg(x)) = f(x) for all g ∈ G, we see that f is constant-valued on O. By continuity,
f is actually constant-valued on O. In particular, any two semisimple y, z ∈ O must satisfy
f(y) = f(z). By Proposition 4.5, O(y) = O(z).
(cid:3)
Theorem 5.4. An adjoint orbit O ⊆ g is semisimple if and only if it is closed in g.
Proof. Assume that O is semisimple and let y ∈ O be given. It follows that O(y) ⊆ O,
or equivalently O(y) ⊆ O. Using this together with Corollary 4.4, we see that ys ∈ O.
The orbit O(ys) is then a semisimple orbit belonging to O, and Lemma 5.3 implies that
O = O(ys). We already know that O(y) ⊆ O (ie. O(y) ≤ O), while Corollary 4.4 gives
O(ys) ⊆ O(y) (ie. O = O(ys) ≤ O(y)). Hence O(y) = O. This implies that y ∈ O, and we
conclude that O is closed.
19
Conversely, assume that O is closed in g and choose a point x ∈ O. Corollary 4.4 implies
(cid:3)
that xs ∈ O = O, meaning that O = O(xs) is a semisimple orbit.
Corollary 5.5. If O ⊆ g is a semisimple orbit, then O is an affine variety.
Proof. This follows from the fact that O is closed in the affine variety g.
(cid:3)
5.2. Stabilizer descriptions. Recall from 3.2 that x ∈ g is semisimple if and only if Adg(x) ∈
t for some g ∈ G. It follows that an adjoint orbit is semisimple if and only if it is of the
form O(h) for h ∈ t. Now given h1, h2 ∈ t, one can show that O(h1) = O(h2) if and only if
h1 and h2 belong to the same W-orbit in t. We conclude that [h] 7→ O(h) defines a bijection
from t/W to the set of semisimple orbits. At the same time, each equivalence class in t/W
has a unique representative belonging to
(26)
(see [17], Section 2.2). Our parametrization of semisimple orbits therefore takes the form
D := {h ∈ t : ∀α ∈ Π, Re(α(h)) ≥ 0 and Re(α(h)) = 0 =⇒ Im(α(h)) ≥ 0}
Given h ∈ D, we have the following instance of the orbit-stabilizer isomorphism (3):
h 7→ O(h), h ∈ D.
(27)
O(h) ∼= G/CG(h).
In the interest of using (27) to study semisimple orbits, we turn our attention to the struc-
ture of CG(h). To this end, set
Π(h) := {α ∈ Π : α(h) = 0}.
Recall that Π(h) determines a standard parabolic subgroup PΠ(h) with Levi decomposition
PΠ(h) = UΠ(h) ⋊ LΠ(h), as explained in 3.1.
Proposition 5.6. If h ∈ D, then CG(h) = LΠ(h).
Proof. To begin, note that PΠ(h) is connected (see [57, Thm. 28.4.2]). It follows that the
∼= LΠ(h) is also connected. At the same time, CG(h) is known to be
quotient PΠ(h)/UΠ(h)
connected (see [17, Thm. 2.3.3]). Proving CG(h) = LΠ(h) therefore amounts to establishing
the equality of these groups' respective Lie algebras Cg(H) and lΠ(h). To this end, as t
is abelian and h ∈ t, we have t ⊆ Cg(h). It follows that Cg(h) decomposes as a direct
sum of t and certain root spaces. To determine these root spaces note that α ∈ ∆ satisfies
gα ⊆ Cg(h) if and only if α(h) = 0. Hence,
Cg(h) = t ⊕ Mα∈∆
α(h)=0
gα.
Using this together with (12), we are reduced to proving that
(28)
∆Π(h) = {α ∈ ∆ : α(h) = 0}.
The inclusion ∆Π(h) ⊆ {α ∈ ∆ : α(h) = 0} clearly holds. Conversely, suppose that
α ∈ ∆ satisfies α(h) = 0. There exist simple roots α1, . . . , αk ∈ Π and non-zero integers
n1, . . . , nk ∈ Z \ {0} such that
(29)
α =
kXi=1
20
niαi.
Since α(h) = 0, we have
(30)
0 =
niαi(h).
kXi=1
In particular, 0 = Pk
Also, taking imaginary parts in (30) gives 0 =Pk
i=1 niRe(αi(h)). Now, recall from (26) that Re(αi(h)) ≥ 0 for all
i, and note that all ni are strictly positive or all ni are strictly negative. It follows that
Re(αi(h)) = 0 for all i. Noting that h ∈ D, it must be true that Im(αi(h)) ≥ 0 for all i.
i=1 niIm(αi(h)). Again using the fact that
all ni are strictly positive or all ni are strictly negative, it follows that Im(αi(h)) = 0 for
all i. We conclude that αi(h) = 0 (ie. αi ∈ Π(h)) for all i, which by (29) implies α ∈ ∆Π(h).
Having shown (28) to hold, our proof is complete.
(cid:3)
Proposition 5.6 gives rise to the following more uniform description of the stabilizers
of semisimple elements.
Corollary 5.7. If x ∈ g is semisimple, then CG(x) is a Levi factor of a parabolic subgroup of G.
Proof. Since x is semisimple, x = Adg(h) for some g ∈ G and h ∈ D. It follows that
CG(x) = gCG(h)g−1, which by Proposition 5.6 is precisely gLΠ(h)g−1. This is a Levi factor
of the parabolic subgroup gPΠ(h)g−1.
(cid:3)
We conclude this section with a proof of the existence of regular adjoint orbits, as
promised in 4.2.
Corollary 5.8. There exist regular adjoint orbits in g.
Proof. Let {ǫα}α∈Π and h ∈ t be as defined in Example 3.7. Since α(h) = 2 for all α ∈ Π, we
see that h ∈ D and Π(h) = ∅. It follows that lΠ(h) = t (see (12)), which together with the
connectedness of LΠ(h) (established in the proof of Proposition 5.6) implies that LΠ(h) = T .
Now the orbit-stabilizer isomorphism (27) and Proposition 5.6 give
dim(O(h)) = dim(G/T ) = dim(G) − dim(T ) = dim(G) − rank(G).
In other words, O(h) is a regular adjoint orbit.
(cid:3)
5.3. Fibrations over partial flag varieties. Consider a point h ∈ D, to be regarded as
fixed throughout 5.3, and recall the variety isomorphism O(h) ∼= G/CG(h) in (27). Propo-
sition 5.6 allows us to write the right-hand-side of this isomorphism as G/LΠ(h), and the
we have a canonical fibre bundle
inclusion LΠ(h) ⊆ PΠ(h) gives rise to a fibration UΠ(h)→ G/LΠ(h)→ G/PΠ(h). In other words,
(31)
where πh(Adg(h)) = [g] ∈ G/PΠ(h) for all g ∈ G.
UΠ(h)→ O(h)
πh−→ G/PΠ(h),
The fibre UΠ(h) is unipotent, so that the exponential map restricts to a variety isomor-
∼=−→ UΠ(h) (see [34, Chapt. VIII, Thm. 1.1]). It follows that the fibres of (31)
phism uΠ(h)
are affine spaces, raising the issue of whether O(h) is isomorphic to the total space of
a vector bundle over G/PΠ(h). Perhaps surprisingly, one cannot expect an isomorphism
on the level of algebraic varieties. The total space of a vector bundle over G/PΠ(h) con-
tains G/PΠ(h) as the zero-section, and one knows G/PΠ(h) to be irreducible (since G is irre-
ducible) and projective (see [57, Cor. 28.1.4]). It follows that the zero-section is a closed,
21
irreducible, projective subvariety. However, the only a such subvarieties of the affine
variety O(h) are the singletons. A similar argument precludes the existence of a biholo-
morphism, as a compact, connected, complex submanifold of the Stein manifold O(h) is
necessarily a point.5 Nevertheless, it turns out that there is a diffeomorphism between
O(h) and (the total space of) T ∗(G/PΠ(h)) that respects fibrations over G/PΠ(h). We devote
the balance of 5.3 to an explicit construction of this diffeomorphism.
Remark 5.9. By invoking well-known facts from hyperkahler geometry, one can deduce
that O(h) and T ∗(G/PΠ(h)) are diffeomorphic without having to construct a diffeomor-
phism. To this end, recall that O(h) is a hyperkahler manifold (see 4.5). Among other
things, it follows that the underlying smooth manifold O(h) carries a family of complex
structures. This family turns out to include the usual complex structure on O(h) (ie. the
one it inherits as a subvariety of g), as well as one in which O(h) becomes biholomor-
phic to T ∗(G/PΠ(h)) (see [11, Thm. 2]). One concludes that O(h) and T ∗(G/PΠ(h)) must be
diffeomorphic. While this approach is elegant, it is difficult to extract an explicit diffeo-
morphism O(h) ∼= T ∗(G/PΠ(h)) from the supporting arguments.
Let K ⊆ G be a maximal compact subgroup having K ∩ T as a maximal real torus. We
shall assume the Lie algebra k of K to have the form
(32)
k = (k ∩ t) ⊕ Mα∈∆+
spanR{eα − e−α}! ⊕ Mα∈∆+
spanR{i(eα + e−α)}! ,
where eα ∈ gα \ {0} and e−α ∈ g−α \ {0} for each α ∈ ∆+ (cf. the proof of Theorem 6.11
in [40]). Now note that K acts transitively on G/PΠ(h) by left multiplication (see [49, Chapt.
5, Sect. 8]), and that the K-stabilizer of the identity coset [e] ∈ G/PΠ(h) is K ∩ PΠ(h) =: KΠ(h).
By the orbit-stabilizer isomorphism (3), this time for compact Lie group actions, we have
a K-equivariant diffeomorphism.
(33)
K/KΠ(h)
We will later need the following result concerning KΠ(h).
∼=−→ G/PΠ(h).
Lemma 5.10. We have KΠ(h) ⊆ LΠ(h).
Proof. We begin by showing KΠ(h) to be connected. To this end, consider the fibration
KΠ(h) → K→ K/KΠ(h). The base is simply-connected by virtue of being diffeomorphic to
G/PΠ(h), a simply-connected space (see [1, Chapt. 3, Sect. 1, Prop. 7]). The total space K
is homotopy-equivalent to G (see [59, Appendix A, Thm. 1.1]), so that the connectedness
of K follows from that of G. Using these two observations together with the long exact
sequence of homotopy groups associated to our fibration (see [59, Chapt. IV, Cor. 8.6]),
we see that KΠ(h) is also connected. It will therefore suffice to prove that kΠ(h) ⊆ lΠ(h),
where kΠ(h) and lΠ(h) are the Lie algebras of KΠ(h) and LΠ(h), respectively. The former Lie
algebra is k ∩ pΠ(h), which via (10) and (32) can be shown to coincide with
(k ∩ t) ⊕
spanR{eα − e−α}
⊕
Mα∈∆+
Π(h)
spanR{i(eα + e−α)}
.
Mα∈∆+
Π(h)
5For the definitions and results necessary to make this argument, we refer the reader to [22, Chapt. V,
Sect. 1].
22
Since t ⊆ lΠ(h) and gα ⊕ g−α ⊆ lΠ(h) for all α ∈ ∆+
Π(h) (see 12), it follows that kΠ(h) ⊆ lΠ(h). (cid:3)
Let us return to the main discussion. Note that the pullback of T ∗(G/PΠ(h)) under (33) is
a smooth complex vector bundle E→ K/KΠ(h), so that we have the commutative diagram
T ∗(G/PΠ(h))
E
∼=
(34)
K/KΠ(h)
∼=
G/PΠ(h)
One can show E to be a K-equivariant vector bundle, meaning that K acts smoothly on
E via a lift of the left multiplication action on K/KΠ(h) (hence k ∈ K sends the fibre over
x ∈ K/KΠ(h) to the fibre over k · x), and secondly that restricting the action of k ∈ K to the
fibre over x ∈ K/KΠ(h) gives a vector space isomorphism with the fibre over k · x. Since the
identity coset [e] ∈ K/KΠ(h) is fixed by KΠ(h), this second condition implies that the fibre
over [e] in any K-equivariant vector bundle is a complex KΠ(h)-representation. In fact, this
turns out to define a bijective correspondence between isomorphism classes of (smooth)
complex KΠ(h)-representations and isomorphism classes of smooth K-equivariant com-
plex vector bundles over K/KΠ(h). The inverse process assigns to each representation
freely on K × V via g · (k, v) = (kg−1, ϕ(g)v), g ∈ KΠ(h), k ∈ K, v ∈ V. One defines K ×KΠ(h) V
to be the quotient manifold (K × V)/KΠ(h), equipped with the projection to K/KΠ(h) given
ϕ : KΠ(h)→ GL(V) the associated bundle K ×KΠ(h) V, defined as follows. The group KΠ(h) acts
by [(k, v)] 7→ [k]. The fibres of this projection are naturally complex vector spaces, and the
K-equivariant structure comes from the left-multiplicative action of K on the first factor of
K ×KΠ(h) V.
With the above discussion in mind, it is natural to realize E as an associated bundle. To
this end, UΠ(h) is a normal subgroup of PΠ(h) by virtue of the former being the unipo-
It follows that uΠ(h) is invariant under PΠ(h) (hence also the
tent radical of the latter.
subgroup KΠ(h)), acting through the adjoint representation of G. In particular, uΠ(h) is a
KΠ(h)-representation.
Lemma 5.11. There is an isomorphism E ∼= K ×KΠ(h) uΠ(h) of K-equivariant vector bundles over
K/KΠ(h).
Proof. Given our discussion of the correspondence between isomorphism classes of K-
equivariant vector bundles and those of KΠ(h)-representations, it will suffice to prove that
uΠ(h) is isomorphic to the fibre of E over [e] ∈ K/KΠ(h) as a KΠ(h)-representation. The latter
is the dual of the tangent space to [e] ∈ G/PΠ(h), which by (5) (with O = G/PΠ(h)) is
isomorphic to (g/pΠ(h))∗. One can identify (g/pΠ(h))∗ with {φ ∈ g∗ : φpΠ(h) = 0}, which
under our isomorphism g∗ ∼= g corresponds to {x ∈ g : hx, yi = 0 for all y ∈ pΠ(h)}. This
last subspace can be seen to coincide with uΠ(h), as desired. We leave it as an exercise for
the reader to verify that each of the above-constructed isomorphisms is an isomorphism
of PΠ(h) (hence also KΠ(h)-) representations.
(cid:3)
Using Lemma 5.11, we may present (34) as
23
(35)
K ×KΠ(h) uΠ(h)
K/KΠ(h)
∼=
∼=
T ∗(G/PΠ(h))
G/PΠ(h).
Proposition 5.12. There is a K-equivariant diffeomorphism T ∗(G/PΠ(h))
following diagram commutes:
(36)
T ∗(G/PΠ(h))
∼=
O(h)
.
πh
G/PΠ(h)
∼=−→ O(h) for which the
Proof. We will construct a K-equivariant diffeomorphism K ×KΠ(h) uΠ(h)
(37)
K ×KΠ(h) uΠ(h)
∼=
O(h)
πh
K/KΠ(h)
∼=
G/PΠ(h)
∼=−→ O(h) making
commute. By reversing the horizontal arrows in (35) and combining with (37), we will
have constructed the desired isomorphism T ∗(G/PΠ(h))
K×KΠ(h) (PΠ(h)/LΠ(h)) denote the quotient of K×(PΠ(h)/LΠ(h)) by the KΠ(h)-action g·(k, [p]) =
(kg−1, [gp]), g ∈ KΠ(h), k ∈ K, p ∈ PΠ(h). The proof of Lemma 2.4 in [2] shows the map
to be a (well-defined) diffeomorphism. In the interest of re-writing (38), recall that LΠ(h) =
CG(h) (see Proposition 5.6). One therefore has the orbit-stabilizer isomorphism
K ×KΠ(h) (PΠ(h)/LΠ(h))→ G/LΠ(h),
∼=−→ O(h). Accordingly, let
[(k, [p])] 7→ [kp]
(38)
(39)
As for the domain of (38), note that the Levi factorization (11) implies UΠ(h)→ PΠ(h)/LΠ(h),
u 7→ [u], is a variety isomorphism. Identifying UΠ(h) with uΠ(h) via the exponential map,
this isomorphism becomes
(40)
G/LΠ(h)
∼=−→ O(h),
uΠ(h)→ PΠ(h)/LΠ(h),
[g] 7→ Adg(h).
x 7→ [exp(x)].
Since KΠ(h) ⊆ LΠ(h) (see Lemma 5.10) and exp(Adg(x)) = g exp(x)g−1 for all g ∈ KΠ(h) and
x ∈ uΠ(h), one can show (40) to be KΠ(h)-equivariant. This allows us to replace PΠ(h)/LΠ(h)
in (38) with uΠ(h), giving rise to the diffeomorphism
(41)
K ×KΠ(h) uΠ(h)→ K ×KΠ(h) (PΠ(h)/LΠ(h)),
[(k, x)] 7→ [(k, [exp(x)])].
Now composing the three diffeomorphisms (38), (39), and (41) (in the only order that
makes sense), we obtain
(42)
K ×KΠ(h) uΠ(h)→ O(h),
24
[(k, x)] 7→ Adk exp(x)(h).
This diffeomorphism is clearly K-equivariant. To see that it makes (37) commute, note
that the composite map K ×KΠ(h) uΠ(h)→ K/KΠ(h)→ G/PΠ(h) sends [(k, x)] ∈ K ×KΠ(h) uΠ(h)
to [k] ∈ G/PΠ(h). On the other hand, the composite map K ×KΠ(h) uΠ(h)→ O(h)→ G/PΠ(h)
sends [(k, x)] ∈ K ×KΠ(h) uΠ(h) to [k exp(x)] ∈ G/PΠ(h). However, since x ∈ uΠ(h) ⊆ pΠ(h), we
must have exp(x) ∈ PΠ(h). It follows that [k exp(x)] = [k] in G/PΠ(h), so that (37) indeed
commutes. This completes the proof.
(cid:3)
Proposition 5.12 has strong implications for the topology (both equivariant and non-
equivariant) of a semisimple orbit.
Corollary 5.13. There is a K-equivariant homotopy equivalence between O(h) and the compact
group orbit OK(h) = K · h.
Proof. Note that K ×KΠ(h) uΠ(h) is K-equivariantly homotopy equivalent to its zero-section.
Since (42) is a K-equivariant diffeomorphism, it follows that the image of the zero-section
under (42) is K-equivariantly homotopy equivalent to O(h). The zero-section is given by
{[(k, 0)] ∈ K ×KΠ(h) uΠ(h) : k ∈ K}, and its image under (42) is the K-orbit OK(h) ⊆ O(h). This
completes the proof.
(cid:3)
An essentially analogous version of Corollary 5.13 is as follows. The cotangent bundle
projection T ∗(G/PΠ(h)) → G/PΠ(h) is a K-equivariant (in fact, G-equivariant) homotopy
equivalence, so that (36) shows πh : O(h) → G/PΠ(h) to be a K-equivariant homotopy
equivalence. In principle, one can use this fact to compute various topological invari-
ants of O(h).
Indeed, since G/PΠ(h) is simply-connected (as discussed in the proof of
Lemma 5.10), so too is O(h). Secondly, the cohomology ring H∗(O(h); Z) is isomorphic
to H∗(G/PΠ(h); Z), which has a well-studied description in terms of Schubert calculus
(see [7]). This result has an equivariant counterpart, namely that the L-equivariant co-
homology rings H∗
L(G/PΠ(h); Z) are isomorphic for any closed subgroup
L ⊆ K (see [14] for details on equivariant cohomology). If one takes L to be the maxi-
mal torus K ∩ T of K, then H∗
L(G/PΠ(h); Z) is describable via equivariant Schubert calculus
(see [30,50]) and (if one works over C instead of Z) Goresky-Kottwitz-MacPherson (GKM)
theory (see [32]).
L(O(h); Z) and H∗
5.4. Equivariant projective compactifications. While semisimple orbits are affine (see
Corollary 5.5), each turns out to admit a G-equivariant projective compactification (ie. a
projective G-variety X and a G-variety isomorphism between the orbit and an invariant
open dense subvariety of X). To properly construct this compactification, however, we
will need a few preliminary results. Let w0 ∈ W denote the longest element of the Weyl
group (see [15, Chapt. 20]). It is known that w0 · Π = −Π, so that S 7→ S∨ := −w0 · S
defines an involution on the collection of subsets S ⊆ Π. With this in mind, we have the
following lemma.
Lemma 5.14. For S ⊆ Π, we have w0 · ∆−
S∨ = ∆+
S .
Proof. Let us write S = {α1, . . . , αn}, so that S∨ = {γ1, . . . , γn} with γi = −w0 · αi for all i.
Given β ∈ ∆+
i=1 kiαi with k1, . . . , kn ∈ Z≥0. It follows that
S , we have β =Pn
w0 · β =
nXi=1
(−ki)(−w0 · αi) =
25
(−ki)γi.
nXi=1
Since w0 · β is a root, this implies that w0 · β ∈ ∆−
β ∈ w0 · ∆−
S∨.
Conversely, if β ∈ w0 ·∆−
that
S∨, then β = w0 ·(Pn
β = w0 · nXi=1
ki(−w0 · αi)! =
Noting that β is a root, this implies that β ∈ ∆+
S .
S∨. Using the fact that w2
0 = e, we have
i=1 kiγi) with k1, . . . , kn ∈ Z≤0. We conclude
(−ki)αi.
nXi=1
(cid:3)
Given S ⊆ Π, the subset S∨ ⊆ Π determines a standard parabolic subgroup PS∨ ⊆ G (as
discussed in 3.1). Now consider the parabolic subgroup P∗
S ⊆ G defined by
(43)
where w0PS∨(w0)−1 := gPS∨g−1 for any representative g ∈ NG(T ) of w0.
S := w0PS∨(w0)−1,
P∗
Proposition 5.15. For S ⊆ Π, we have PS ∩ P∗
S = LS.
Proof. Since LS and PS ∩ P∗
S are connected (the former by the beginning of the proof of
Proposition 5.6 and the latter by [21, Prop. 2.1]), it suffices to establish the equality of
their respective Lie algebras. The latter Lie algebra is precisely pS ∩ w0 · pS∨, where w0 · pS∨
denotes the adjoint action of a lift of w0 to NG(T ). This intersection contains t and therefore
decomposes as a direct sum of t and the root spaces belonging to both pS and w0 · pS∨. To
identify these root spaces, note that
pS = t ⊕ Mα∈∆+
w0 · pS∨ = t ⊕ Mα∈w0·∆+
gα
S
gα! ⊕
Mα∈∆−
gα! ⊕
.
gα
Mα∈w0·∆−
S∨ = ∆+
S∨
Since w0 · ∆+ = ∆− (see [15, Prop. 20.14] and w0 · ∆−
re-write (45) to obtain
S (by Lemma 5.14), we may
(44)
and
(45)
(46)
Using (44) and (46), we conclude that
S
w0 · pS∨ = t ⊕
Mα∈∆+
pS ∩ w0 · pS∨ = t ⊕
Mα∈∆+
S
gα
gα
⊕ Mα∈∆−
⊕
Mα∈∆−
S
gα! .
gα
= lS,
(cid:3)
the Lie algebra of LS. This completes the proof.
Returning to the discussion of equivariant projective orbit compactifications, fix h ∈ D
and consider its semisimple orbit O(h). Also, let X be any G-variety. By means of (39),
a G-variety isomorphism between O(h) and an invariant subvariety Y ⊆ X is equivalent
26
to a G-variety isomorphism between G/LΠ(h) and Y. Now by the general orbit-stabilizer
theory developed in 2.3, specifying the latter isomorphism is equivalent to specifying
a point x ∈ X with CG(x) = LΠ(h).
In this case, G/LΠ(h) (hence O(h)) is equivariantly
identified with the G-orbit of x in X.
In light of the above, we seek a projective G-variety X and a point x ∈ X with CG(x) =
LΠ(h). To this end, consider the diagonal G-action (see Example 2.6) on the projective
variety X = G/PΠ(h) × G/P∗
Π(h). Consider also the pair of identity cosets x = ([e], [e]) ∈ X.
The G-stabilizer of x is PΠ(h)∩P∗
Π(h), which by Proposition 5.15 is precisely LΠ(h). Appealing
to the previous paragraph, the following is a G-variety isomorphism between O(h) and
the G-orbit G · ([e], [e]) ⊆ G/PΠ(h) × G/P∗
Π(h):
O(h)
Π(h) a G-equivariant projective com-
∼=−→ G · ([e], [e]), Adg(h) 7→ ([g], [g]), g ∈ G.
(47)
Theorem 5.16. If h ∈ D, then (47) makes G/PΠ(h) × G/P∗
pactification of O(h).6
Proof. It remains only to prove that G · ([e], [e]) is open and dense in G/PΠ(h) × G/P∗
Π(h).
However, since G · ([e], [e]) is open in its closure (see 2.2), it will suffice to prove that
G · ([e], [e]) = G/PΠ(h) × G/P∗
Π(h) is irreducible, so that
it has no proper irreducible closed subvarieties of codimension zero (see [36, Sect. 3.2]).
We are therefore reduced to proving that G · ([e], [e]) and G/PΠ(h) × G/P∗
Π(h) have equal
dimensions. The dimension of the former equals that of its open subvariety G · ([e], [e]),
which by (47) equals dim(O(h)). Proposition 5.12 implies dim(O(h)) = 2 dim(G/PΠ(h)),
so that we have
Π(h). Now note that G/PΠ(h) × G/P∗
(48)
dim(G · ([e], [e])) = 2 dim(G/PΠ(h)).
At the same time, we have
(49)
dim(G/PΠ(h) × G/P∗
Π(h)) = dim(G/PΠ(h)) + dim(G/P∗
Π(h)).
Π(h)∨ have the same cardinality. Of course, since ∆−
In light of (48) and (49), it will be enough to prove that dim(G/PΠ(h)) = dim(G/P∗
Π(h))). To this end, Lemma 5.14 implies that ∆+
(or equivalently, dim(PΠ(h)) = dim(P∗
and ∆−
lent to ∆−
dim(pΠ(h)∨), which one can re-write as dim(PΠ(h)) = dim(PΠ(h)∨). Finally, since P∗
defined to be a conjugate of PΠ(h)∨ (see (43)), the dimensions of PΠ(h)∨ and P∗
agree. Hence dim(PΠ(h)) = dim(P∗
Π(h)
Π(h), this is equiva-
Π(h)∨ having the same cardinality. Now (10) implies that dim(pΠ(h)) =
Π(h) was
Π(h) must also
(cid:3)
Π(h) = −∆+
Π(h) and ∆−
Π(h)), as desired.
Π(h))
Remark 5.17. The compactification in Theorem 5.16 turns out to have some context in
the homological mirror symmetry program (see [29, 35] for an introduction to this pro-
gram). Vaguely speaking, an instance of homological mirror symmetry is an equiva-
lence between symplecto-geometric data on a smooth manifold (called the A-side of the
symmetry) and algebro-geometric data on a projective variety (called the B-side of the
symmetry).
In [3], the authors interpret this as a symmetry between so-called A-side
Landau-Ginzburg (LG) models and B-side LG models (see [3, Sect. 1] for further details).
Building on an existing interpretation of a semisimple orbit O(h) as an A-side LG model
6For the precise meaning of "G-equivariant projective compactification", see the beginning of 5.4.
27
(explained in [3, Sect. 1] and based on [26, Thm. 2.2]), the authors explain how one would
make G/PΠ(h) × G/P∗
Π(h) into the corresponding B-side model.
6. NILPOTENT ORBITS
Recall that we introduced semisimple orbits as generalizing the conjugacy classes of
diagonalizable matrices. We now discuss the appropriate generalization of a nilpotent
conjugacy class – a nilpotent orbit.
6.1. Definitions and first results. Recall that the nilpotent cone N ⊆ g is invariant under
the adjoint action of G (see 3.2). It follows that N is a union of those adjoint orbits O for
which O ∩ N 6= ∅ (ie. O contains a nilpotent element). Such adjoint orbits will be called
nilpotent orbits.
Definition 6.1. An adjoint orbit O ⊆ g is called a nilpotent orbit if O∩N 6= ∅, or equivalently
O ⊆ N.
While this is generally taken to be the definition of a nilpotent orbit, there are several
equivalent descriptions. Indeed, one can rephrase Proposition 4.6 in the language of ad-
joint orbits as follows.
Proposition 6.2. If O ⊆ g is an adjoint orbit, then the following conditions are equivalent.
(i) O is a nilpotent orbit.
(ii) O is invariant under the dilation action of C∗ on g.
(iii) 0 ∈ O.
(iv) For all f ∈ C[g]G, f takes the constant value f(0) on O.
Example 6.3. Let G = SLn(C). By Theorem 3.3 and Example 4.1, the nilpotent orbits in
sln(C) are exactly the conjugacy classes of the nilpotent n × n matrices (which necessarily
have zero trace). These conjugacy classes are in turn indexed by the nilpotent n× n matri-
ces in Jordan canonical form, modulo permutations of Jordan blocks along the diagonal.
Of course, each of these equivalence classes of nilpotent Jordan matrices has a unique
representative whose block heights, read from top to bottom, form a non-decreasing se-
quence. The sequences one obtains in this way are precisely the partitions of n, ie. the
positive integer sequences λ = (λ1, λ2, . . . , λk), 1 ≤ k ≤ n, satisfying λ1 ≥ λ2 ≥ . . . ≥ λk
and λ1 + λ2 + . . . + λk = n. It follows that the nilpotent orbits in sln(C) are explicitly
parametrized by the partitions of n. In particular, there are only finitely many nilpotent
SLn(C)-orbits.
This last point about finiteness turns out to hold in much greater generality. More
precisely, it turns out there are only finitely many nilpotent G-orbits. The proof of this fact,
however, is far more complicated than what appears in Example 6.3. One approach uses
ideas related to the Springer resolution and Steinberg variety (see [16, Sect. 3.3] for more
details). Another strategy is to classify nilpotent orbits using so-called "weighted Dynkin
diagrams" and appeal to the fact that there are only finitely many of the latter (see [17,
Chapt. 3]). Here, we will see the finiteness of nilpotent orbits as a direct consequence of
Kostant's work on the adjoint quotient.
Theorem 6.4. There are only finitely many nilpotent orbits.
28
Proof. Recall the description of the adjoint quotient given in (24). It will suffice to prove
that Φ−1(0) = N, since Theorem 4.7 will then show N to be a union of finitely many adjoint
orbits. To this end, Proposition 4.6 implies that x ∈ g is nilpotent if and only if f(x) = f(0)
for all f ∈ C[g]G. Letting χ1, χ2, . . . , χr ∈ C[g]G be the homogeneous generators mentioned
in 4.4, this is equivalent to χj(x) = 0 for all j = 1, . . . , n, ie. Φ(x) = 0. The preceding
argument establishes that Φ−1(0) = N, as desired.
(cid:3)
6.2. The closure order on nilpotent orbits. In what follows, we will see that nilpotent or-
bits are profitably studied in the context of the closure order (see 2.4) on the set of adjoint
G-orbits. To help formulate this, recall that a subset Q of a poset is called a "connected
component" if it is maximal with respect to the following property: if p, q ∈ Q, then there
exists a sequence r1, . . . , rk ∈ Q with r1 = p, rk = q and for all j ∈ {1, . . . , k − 1}, rj ≤ rj+1
or rj ≥ rj+1 (ie. p and q are "connected" by a sequence of comparisons in Q). It turns out
that the nilpotent orbits form a "connected component" in the poset of adjoint orbits.
Proposition 6.5. The nilpotent orbits form a connected component in the poset of adjoint orbits.
Proof. To begin, {0} is clearly a nilpotent orbit and Proposition 6.2 (iii) implies that {0} ≤ O
for all nilpotent orbits O. In other words, all nilpotent orbits are "connected" to {0} in the
above-defined sense. In particular, any two nilpotent orbits are connected by a sequence
of comparisons with other nilpotent orbits.
It now remains only to show maximality,
namely that if a nilpotent orbit O and an adjoint orbit Θ satisfy Θ ≤ O or O ≤ Θ, then
Θ is a nilpotent orbit. To this end, suppose O and Θ are nilpotent and adjoint orbits,
respectively. If Θ ≤ O, then by definition Θ ⊆ O. Since N is a closed subvariety of g (see
3.2) containing O, we must have O ⊆ N. Hence Θ ⊆ N, meaning that Θ is a nilpotent
orbit. For the other case, assume that O ≤ Θ. It follows by definition that O ⊆ Θ, and
therefore also O ⊆ Θ. Since 0 ∈ O (see Proposition 6.2 (iii)), 0 ∈ Θ and Proposition 6.2
shows that Θ is a nilpotent orbit.
(cid:3)
Remark 6.6. There is no immediate analogue of Proposition 6.5 for semisimple orbits. For
one thing, it is possible for O ≤ Θ to hold when O is a semisimple orbit and Θ is a non-
semisimple adjoint orbit. Indeed, let Θ be any non-semisimple adjoint orbit. Lemma 5.3
implies that there exists a unique semisimple orbit O satisfying O ⊆ Θ. By construction,
O ≤ Θ.
Example 6.7. Let us describe the poset of nilpotent orbits in sln(C). To this end, recall that
Example 6.3 uses the partitions of n to explicitly parametrize the nilpotent SLn(C)-orbits.
It follows that the closure order on these nilpotent orbits corresponds to a partial order
on the partitions of n, which Gerstenhaber [27, Chapt. 1, Thm. 2] and Hesselink [33,
Thm. 3.10] showed to coincide with the dominance order on partitions. Two partitions
λ = (λ1, λ2, . . . , λk) and µ = (µ1, µ2, . . . , µℓ) of n satisfy λ ≤ µ in the dominance order
precisely when for all p ∈ {1, . . . , n}, λ1 + λ2 + . . . + λp ≤ µ1 + µ2 + . . . + µp, where we
define λj := 0 for j > k and µj := 0 for j > ℓ.
6.3. The regular nilpotent orbit. Having discussed nilpotent orbits in general, we turn
our attention to a few particularly notable orbits. For the first of these, recall that the
proof of Theorem 6.4 shows N to be a fibre of the adjoint quotient. It then follows from
Theorem 4.7 that N contains a unique regular adjoint orbit. This amounts to the existence
29
of a unique regular nilpotent orbit, which we shall denote by Oreg. Alternatively, one can
characterize Oreg via the closure order as follows.
Proposition 6.8. In the poset of nilpotent orbits with the closure order, Oreg is the unique maximal
element.
Proof. Let O be any nilpotent orbit. Since Oreg is dense in N (by Theorem 4.7), we have
O ⊆ N = Oreg. Hence O ≤ Oreg, as desired.
(cid:3)
Example 6.9. Recall that Example 6.3 used partitions of n to index nilpotent SLn(C)-
orbits, and Example 6.7 in turn mentioned the correspondence between the dominance
order on partitions of n and the closure order on nilpotent SLn(C)-orbits. Furthermore,
one readily sees that the partition λ = (n) is the unique maximal element in the domi-
nance order. It follows from Proposition 6.8 that Oreg ⊆ sln(C) is indexed by λ = (n),
meaning that Oreg is the conjugacy class of the n × n nilpotent Jordan block.
This last example raises the question of whether, in general, Oreg has any standard rep-
resentatives. Kostant [42] answered this question in the affirmative, but we will need to
recall a few facts about the representation theory of sl2(C) before elaborating on his ar-
gument. Let φ : sl2(C)→ gl(V) be an sl2(C)-representation, ie. V is a finite-dimensional
complex vector space and φ is a Lie algebra morphism. One knows such a representation
to be completely reducible, meaning that
n
for irreducible sl2(C)-subrepresentations Vk ⊆ V. Now let X, H, Y ∈ sl2(C) be the usual
generators, as defined in (16). Each subrepresentation Vk decomposes into eigenspaces
are integers and form a string as follows: if λk is the largest eigenvalue, then λk ≥ 0 and
−λk, −λk + 2, −λk + 4, . . . , λk − 2, λk is a complete list of the eigenvalues. Finally, the last
of φ(H), which are known to be one-dimensional. The eigenvalues of φ(H) : Vk → Vk
facts we will need are the following decompositions of the kernels of φ(X) : V → V and
φ(H) : V → V:
ker(φ(X)) =
Vk(λk),
(50)
V =
Vk
Mk=1
n
Mk=1
Mk=1
n
(51)
ker(φ(H)) =
Vk(0),
where Vk(λk) and Vk(0) denote the λk and 0-eigenspaces of φ(H) : Vk→ Vk, respectively.7
Proposition 6.10. Recalling the notation used in Example 3.7, the nilpotent element ξ =Pα∈Π eα
belongs to Oreg.
Proof. This proof will begin with two intermediate claims. For the first, recall that Exam-
ple 3.7 includes ξ in an explicit sl2(C)-triple (ξ, h, η). We claim that every eigenvalue of
adh : g→ g is an even integer. However, since each summand appearing in the root space
7Note that 0 need not be an eigenvalue, so that Vk(0) = {0} may hold.
30
decomposition (7) of g is adh-invariant, it will suffice to establish that adh acts on each
summand with only even eigenvalues. Now, since adh(x) = 0 for all x ∈ t, we see that 0 is
that for all x ∈ gβ, we have adh(x) = β(h)x. To see that the eigenvalue β(h) is an even
the unique eigenvalue of adh : t→ t. For the root space summands, suppose β ∈ ∆. Note
integer, let us write β = Pα∈Π cαα for cα ∈ Z, α ∈ Π. Example 3.7 shows that α(h) = 2
for all α ∈ Π, meaning that β(h) = 2Pα∈Π cα is indeed an even integer. Hence every
eigenvalue of adh : g→ g is an even integer.
restrict the adjoint representation ad : g → gl(g) to a representation of the subalgebra
a := span{ξ, h, η} ∼= sl2(C) on g. One can now think of g as an sl2(C)-representation in
which X, H, Y ∈ sl2(C) are identified with ξ, h, η ∈ a, respectively. Now, decompose g into
irreducible a-subrepresentations,
Our second claim is that Cg(h) and Cg(ξ) have the same dimension. To see this, we
(52)
g =
Vk.
n
Mk=1
Since the eigenvalues of adh : g → g are even integers, the same is necessarily true of
the eigenvalues of adh on each irreducible subrepresentation Vk. The string description
of the latter eigenvalues (explained just before this proposition) implies that 0 occurs as
an eigenvalue in each Vk. Since Vk(0) is then one-dimensional for each k, (51) implies
that dim(ker(adh)) equals n, the number of irreducible summands in (52). A similar
argument uses (50) to show that dim(ker(adξ)) = n. Of course, as ker(adh) = Cg(h) and
ker(adξ) = Cg(ξ), we have actually shown that dim(Cg(h)) = dim(Cg(ξ)).
We may now give a direct proof of our proposition, which is equivalent to the state-
ment that O(ξ) = Oreg. Now, as ξ is nilpotent and Oreg is the unique regular nilpotent
orbit, this is equivalent to O(ξ) being a regular adjoint orbit. This is in turn equivalent to
dim(CG(ξ)) = rank(G), since dim(O(ξ)) = dim(G/CG(ξ)) = dim(G) − dim(CG(ξ)). At
the same time, we know dim(CG(ξ)) = dim(Cg(ξ)) = dim(Cg(h)) = dim(CG(h)). Our
task is therefore to show that dim(CG(h)) = rank(G). However, the proof of Corollary 5.8
explains that CG(h) = LΠ(h) = T for our choice of h, so that the dim(CG(h)) = dim(T ) =
rank(G). This completes the proof.
(cid:3)
Remark 6.11. Kostant found a curious relationship between the decomposition (52) and
the topology of G. To formulate it, note that the last two paragraphs in the proof of Propo-
sition 6.10 can be used to show that (52) has exactly r := rank(G) irreducible summands.
If d1, d2, . . . , dr are their respective dimensions, then the Poincar´e polynomial of G factors
as follows:
(53)
(see [42, Cor. 8.7]).8
PG(t) =
(1 + tdj)
rYj=1
8Strictly speaking, Kostant's result is that (53) is the Poincar´e polynomial of the adjoint group of g. The
adjoint group is just the quotient of G by its (finite) centre, and one can use this fact to show that (53) must
also be the Poincar´e polynomial of G.
31
6.4. The minimal nilpotent orbit. Having studied Oreg as the unique maximal element
in the poset of nilpotent orbits (see Proposition 6.8), it is natural to wonder about an
analogous result at the opposite extreme - the existence of a unique minimal nilpotent
orbit. However, a first investigation yields underwhelming results. The singleton {0} is
the unique minimal nilpotent orbit, since Proposition 6.2 implies that {0} ⊆ O for all nilpo-
tent orbits O. It is therefore a natural next step to study the minimal non-zero nilpotent
orbits. Interestingly, there turns out to be a unique such orbit when G is simple. At the
same time, G being simple implies the existence of a unique θ ∈ ∆ with the property of
being maximal among all roots in the partial order (9) (see [57, Thm. 18.9.2]). We then
have the following theorem, which is essentially a restatement of Theorem 4.3.3 in [17].
Theorem 6.12. If G is simple and eθ ∈ gθ \ {0}, then O(eθ) is the unique minimal element in the
poset of non-zero nilpotent orbits.
One denotes the above orbit by Omin and calls it the minimal nilpotent orbit. Note that
being minimal in the poset of non-zero nilpotent orbits amounts to the condition Omin =
Omin ∪ {0}.
Example 6.13. Let G = SLn(C), a simple group. Recall from Example 6.7 the poset iso-
morphism between nilpotent SLn(C)-orbits in the closure order and partitions of n in the
dominance order. While λ = (1, 1, . . . , 1) (which corresponds to the orbit {0}) is clearly the
unique minimal partition of n, µ = (2, 1, 1, . . . , 1) is seen to be minimal once µ is excluded.
It follows that µ corresponds to Omin ⊆ sln(C), or equivalently that Omin is the conjugacy
class of a nilpotent Jordan canonical form matrix having a single 2 × 2 Jordan block and 0
for all other entries.
Theorem 6.12 assumes G is simple, so one might legitimately ask whether a unique
minimal non-zero nilpotent orbit exists when G is semisimple. The following example
shows this to be false in general.
Example 6.14. Assume that G is simple, in which case the product G × G is semisimple
but not simple. The latter group has Lie algebra g ⊕ g, and the adjoint representation
Ad : G × G→ GL(g ⊕ g) is as follows:
Ad(g1,g2)(x1, x2) = (Adg1(x1), Adg2(x2))
for all (g1, g2) ∈ G × G and (x1, x2) ∈ g ⊕ g, where (via a slight abuse of notation) Adg1(x1)
and Adg2(x2) come from the adjoint representation of G. Now, let θ ∈ ∆ and eθ ∈ gθ \ {0}
be as discussed above. It follows that the adjoint G × G-orbits of (eθ, 0) and (0, eθ) are
OG×G(eθ, 0) = Omin × {0} and OG×G(0, eθ) = {0} × Omin,
respectively, where Omin ⊆ g is the minimal nilpotent G-orbit. Taking closures, we have
OG×G(eθ, 0) = Omin × {0} = (Omin ∪ {0}) × {0} = OG×G(eθ, 0) ∪ {(0, 0)}
and
OG×G(0, eθ) = {0} × Omin = {0} × (Omin ∪ {0}) = {(0, 0)} ∪ OG×G(0, eθ).
These calculations establish two things. Firstly, since the closures of OG×G(eθ, 0) and
OG×G(0, eθ) contain (0, 0), each orbit is nilpotent (see Proposition 6.2). Secondly, for each
orbit, {(0, 0)} is the unique orbit that is strictly smaller in the closure order. Equivalently,
32
OG×G(eθ, 0) and OG×G(0, eθ) are minimal among the non-zero nilpotent orbits in the clo-
sure order. It is nevertheless clear that OG×G(eθ, 0) 6= OG×G(0, eθ).
6.5. Orbit projectivizations. Recall from Proposition 6.2 that one can characterize nilpo-
tent orbits as those adjoint orbits which are invariant under the dilation action of C∗ on
g. We will see that this fact gives rise to a special geometry enjoyed only by the nilpotent
orbits. Indeed, given a non-zero nilpotent orbit O ⊆ g, we may define its projectivization
to be the quotient
P(O) := O/C∗.
Note that P(O) is, by construction, a subset of the projective space P(g) = (g \ {0})/C∗. The
latter is a G-variety with action map
G × P(g)→ P(g),
(g, [x]) 7→ [Adg(x)],
g ∈ G, [x] ∈ P(g)
(cf. Example 2.9), and it is not difficult to check that P(O) is a G-orbit in P(g). As such,
P(O) is a smooth locally closed subvariety of P(g) (see 2.2). However, P(O) is seldom
closed.
Proposition 6.15. Assume that G is simple and let O ⊆ g be a non-zero nilpotent orbit. Then
P(O) is closed in P(g) if and only if O = Omin.
Proof. The nilpotent cone N ⊆ g is C∗-invariant, and one may define
P(N) := (N \ {0})/C∗.
It is not difficult to see that P(N) is a G-invariant closed subvariety of P(g) whose G-orbits
are precisely the projectivizations of the non-zero nilpotent orbits.
It will therefore be
equivalent to prove that P(Omin) is the unique closed orbit in P(N).9 Now, remember that
P(O) is a union of P(O) and the G-orbits lying below P(O) in the closure order. Showing
P(Omin) to be the unique closed orbit is therefore equivalent to showing it to be the unique
minimal orbit in P(N). We shall do the latter.
Let O ⊆ g be any non-zero nilpotent orbit. Since Omin is the unique minimal non-zero
nilpotent orbit in the closure order, it must be true that Omin ⊆ O \ {0}. Also, because N
is closed in g and contains O, O \ {0} is the closure of O in N \ {0}. The continuity of the
quotient map π : N \ {0}→ P(N) therefore implies π(O \ {0}) ⊆ π(O), and we have
P(Omin) = π(Omin) ⊆ π(O \ {0}) ⊆ π(O) = P(O).
In other words, P(Omin) belongs to the closure of P(O) for all non-zero nilpotent orbits O.
We conclude that P(Omin) is the unique minimal orbit in P(N), as desired.
(cid:3)
Seeking to build on Proposition 6.15, we will assume G to be simple for the duration of
6.5.
Remark 6.16. Recall that the image of a projective variety under a morphism is necessarily
closed. If P(O) is projective, we may take this morphism to be the inclusion P(O) ֒→ P(g)
and conclude that P(O) is closed in P(g). Conversely, if P(O) is closed in P(g), then the
former is necessarily projective. These last two sentences explain that P(O) is projective
if and only if it is closed in P(g), which by Proposition 6.15 is equivalent to O = Omin. In
particular, P(O) is generally not projective.
9Strictly speaking, this will only show P(O) to be closed if and only if P(O) = P(Omin). We leave it as an
exercise to check that P(O) = P(Omin) if and only if O = Omin.
33
While Proposition 6.15 is an important first step in understanding P(Omin), one can say
a great deal more. Indeed, as P(Omin) is a G-orbit, it must be G-equivariantly isomorphic
to G/P for some closed subgroup P ⊆ G. Furthermore, since P(Omin) is projective, P
is necessarily a parabolic subgroup of G (see [57, Cor. 28.1.4]). This subgroup contains
a conjugate of B, meaning that P is conjugate to a standard parabolic subgroup PS (as
defined in 3.1). One can use this to verify that G/P ∼= G/PS, so that P(Omin) and G/PS
are G-equivariantly isomorphic for some subset S ⊆ Π. The following proposition shows
that one can take S to be
Π(θ) := {α ∈ Π : hα, θi = 0},
the set of simple roots that are orthogonal to the maximal root θ.
Proposition 6.17. If G is simple, then there is a G-variety isomorphism G/PΠ(θ)
∼= P(Omin).
Proof. Fix eθ ∈ gθ \ {0} and recall that eθ ∈ Omin (see Theorem 6.12). It follows that [eθ] ∈
P(Omin), so that P(Omin) is the G-orbit of [eθ] in P(g). We claim that CG([eθ]) = PΠ(θ), which
together with the orbit-stabilizer isomorphism (3) will prove the proposition.
Since G is simple, its adjoint representation is irreducible (see [37, Sect. 0.11]) and θ is
the maximal weight of this representation. It follows that Ad(b)(eθ) is a non-zero multiple
of eθ for each b ∈ B (see [36, Sect. 31.3]). This shows that B ⊆ CG([eθ]), meaning that
CG([eθ]) is a standard parabolic subgroup of G. In other words, CG([eθ]) = PS for some
subset S ⊆ Π, and we must show S = Π(θ). Now by the correspondence between subsets
of Π and standard parabolic subgroups (see 3.1), S is the set of simple roots α for which
g−α belongs to Cg([eθ]), the Lie algebra of CG([eθ]). One can show that
Cg([eθ]) = {ξ ∈ g : [ξ, gθ] ⊆ gθ}, so that α ∈ Π belongs to S if and only if [g−α, gθ] ⊆ gθ.
Furthermore, as [g−α, gθ] ∩ gθ = {0}, it follows that α belongs to S if and only if [g−α, gθ] =
{0}. Hence, showing S = Π(θ) amounts to proving that α ∈ Π satisfies [g−α, gθ] = {0} if
and only if hα, θi = 0.
Assume that [g−α, gθ] = {0}. Since θ is the maximal root, α + θ is not a root and we have
[gα, gθ] ⊆ gα+θ = {0}. Applying the Jacobi identity, we see that
(54)
[[g−α, gα], gθ] = {0}.
Letting hα ∈ [g−α, gα] be the coroot associated with α, (54) gives
0 = [hα, eθ] = θ(hα)eθ = 2
hα, θi
hα, αi
eθ.
It follows that hα, θi = 0.
Conversely, assume that hα, θi = 0. If [g−α, gθ] 6= {0}, then gθ−α 6= {0} and θ − α is a root.
Since the set of roots is invariant under the action of W on t∗, sα · (θ − α) is also a root.
However,
sα · (θ − α) = sα · θ − sα · α = θ − 2
hα, θi
hα, αi
α + α = θ + α,
and this contradicts the maximality of θ. We conclude that [g−α, gθ] = {0}.
(cid:3)
Example 6.18. One can use Proposition 6.17 to give a more classical description of P(Omin)
when G = SLn(C). To do this, recall the SLn(C)-specific discussion of the maximal torus,
Borel subgroup, roots, simple roots, etc. given in Example 3.1. It turns out that θ = t1 − tn
is the maximal root, which by the Killing form description (15) implies that
34
Π(θ) = {ti − ti+1 : 2 ≤ i ≤ n − 2}. The set ∆−
combinations of the roots in Π(θ) is ∆−
compute pΠ(θ), one finds the corresponding parabolic subgroup PΠ(θ) ⊆ SLn(C) to be
PΠ(θ) = {(Aij) ∈ SLn(C) : Ai1 = 0 for all i ≥ 2 and Anj = 0 for all j ≤ n − 1}.
Π(θ) of negative roots expressible as linear
Π(θ) = {ti − tj : 2 ≤ j < i ≤ n − 1}. Using (10) to
(55)
In other words, a matrix A ∈ SLn(C) belongs to PΠ(θ) if and only if it is block upper-
triangular with blocks of dimensions 1 × 1, (n − 2) × (n − 2), and 1 × 1 along the diagonal
(read from top to bottom).
Now, recall that Example 2.15 computed the GLn(C)-stabilizer of the flag V e
• ∈ Flag(d•; Cn).
Note that the SLn(C)-stabilizer of V e
• is obtained by intersecting SLn(C) with the GLn(C)-
stabilizer. Furthermore, when d• = (1, n − 1), it is not difficult to see that CSLn(C)(V e
• )
coincides with (55). The action of SLn(C) on Flag(1, n − 1; Cn) is transitive, so that we
have Flag(1, n − 1; Cn) ∼= SLn(C)/CSLn(C)(V e
• ) = SLn(C)/PΠ(θ). Proposition (6.17) identifies
SLn(C)/PΠ(θ) with P(Omin), meaning that we have an SLn(C)-variety isomorphism
P(Omin) ∼= Flag(1, n − 1; Cn).
Remark 6.19. Using similar ideas, one can obtain classical descriptions of P(Omin) in other
Lie types. In type Dn, for instance, P(Omin) identifies with the Grassmannian of isotropic
2-dimensional subspaces in C2n (see [18, Sect. 4.2])
On a somewhat different note, P(Omin) turns out to feature prominently in quaternionic-
Kahler geometry (see [56] for a brief introduction). To develop this point, let X be a complex
manifold and E a holomorphic subbundle of TX. One then has a short exact sequence of
holomorphic bundles on X,
where F := TX/E and θ is the quotient map. Let E and F denote the sheaves of sections of
E and F, respectively, and consider the following pairing:
0→ E→ TX
θ−→ F→ 0,
(56)
E ⊗ E→ F,
(s1, s2) 7→ θ([s1, s2]).10
One calls E a complex contact structure if E has co-rank one in TX and the pairing (56) is
non-degenerate (on both local and global sections of E). Once endowed with a complex
contact structure, X is called a complex contact manifold.
Now, let O ⊆ g be a non-zero nilpotent orbit and recall the canonical symplectic form
ωO ∈ Ω2(O) defined in (25). One can use ωO to induce a canonical complex contact
structure on P(O) (see [5, Prop. 2.2, Rmk. 2.3, Sect. 2.4]11), so that P(O) is a complex
contact manifold. In particular, P(Omin) belongs to the class of Fano contact manifolds
(see [48, Def. 1.3, Def. 2.5]), which are of interest to quaternionic-Kahler geometers (see
[48, Sect. 1]). Moreover, it is in the quaternionic-Kahler context that LeBrun and Salamon
conjectured the following classification of Fano contact manifolds: each is isomorphic,
as a complex contact manifold, to the projectivization of the minimal nilpotent orbit of a
simple algebraic group. This conjecture is known to be true in a number of cases (see [5]),
and counter-examples have not yet been found.
10Note that s1 and s2 may be regarded as vector fields via the inclusion E ⊆ TX, so that [s1, s2] makes
sense.
11Note that some of these are phrased in the language of coadjoint orbits, rather than adjoint orbits.
However, recall from 4.5 that one can identify coadjoint orbits with adjoint orbits.
35
Remark 6.20. When P(Omin) is described in classical terms, as in Example 6.18, one should
expect a similarly classical description of its complex contact structure. Such a description
is given in [18, Sect. 4.2] in Lie type Dn, when P(Omin) is viewed as the Grassmannian of
isotropic 2-dimensional subspaces of C2n.
6.6. Orbit closures and singularities. It turns out that nilpotent orbit closures have been
studied extensively in the literature, both intrinsically and as parts of broader research
programs. We now briefly survey some of this literature, giving references where neces-
sary in order to avoid long digressions.
Recall that the closure of Oreg is the nilpotent cone N. This is singular variety and there
exists a canonical resolution of singularities µ : T ∗(G/B)→ N 12, called the Springer reso-
lution (see [16, Def. 3.2.4]13). While fundamental to the study of singularities in N, µ also
plays a significant role in adjacent subjects. In geometric representation theory, one con-
structs a representation of the Weyl group on the Borel-Moore homology of each fibre of
µ (see [16, Sect. 3.4–3.6]). In symplectic geometry, T ∗(G/B) and Oreg have canonical sym-
plectic forms (see [16, Sect. 1.1] for the former and 4.5 for the latter) and µ is an example
of a symplectic resolution (see [23, Sect. 1.3] for a definition, and all of [23] for an intro-
duction to the subject). This turns out to be an instance of a more general occurrence: for
certain nilpotent orbits O ⊆ g, one can find a parabolic subgroup P ⊆ G and a symplectic
resolution T ∗(G/P)→ O (see [23, Sect. 5.1]14). These nilpotent orbit closures thereby give
examples of symplectic singularities (see [6, Def. 1.1]), which have received a great deal of
recent attention (see [6, 24, 28, 39]).
In addition to the above, nilpotent orbits closures are sometimes studied through their
intersections with certain affine-linear subsets of g, often called Slodowy slices (see [16,
Prop. 3.7.15]). This study was initiated by the works of Brieskorn [13] and Slodowy [52],
which show the intersection of Oreg = N with a particular Slodowy slice to contain a
Kleinian surface singularity when g is of type ADE (see [52, Sect. 6.4] for further details).
This result is interesting in many contexts, and in particular plays a role in Kronheimer's
study of nilpotent orbits in hyperkahler geometry (see [47, Prop. 2(a), Prop. 2(b)]).
REFERENCES
[1] AKHIEZER, D. N. Lie group actions in complex analysis. Aspects of Mathematics, E27. Friedr. Vieweg &
Sohn, Braunschweig, 1995.
[2] AZAD, H., VAN DEN BAN, E., AND BISWAS, I. Symplectic geometry of semisimple orbits. Indag. Math.
(N.S.) 19, 4 (2008), 507–533.
[3] BALLICO, E., GASPARIM, E., GRAMA, L., AND SAN MARTIN, L. Some Landau-Ginzburg models
viewed as rational maps. arxiv:1601.05119 (2016), 16 pages.
[4] BARBASCH, D., AND VOGAN, JR., D. A. Unipotent representations of complex semisimple groups.
Ann. of Math. (2) 121, 1 (1985), 41–110.
[5] BEAUVILLE, A. Fano contact manifolds and nilpotent orbits. Comment. Math. Helv. 73, 4 (1998), 566–
583.
[6] BEAUVILLE, A. Symplectic singularities. Invent. Math. 139, 3 (2000), 541–549.
12By "resolution of singularities", we mean that µ is a proper surjective morphism with the property of
being an isomorphism over the smooth locus of N.
13Note that this reference substitutes G/B with the variety of all Borel subalgebras of g.
14This reference focuses on resolutions of normalizations of orbit closures, but many closures happen to
be normal (see [45], for example).
36
[7] BERNSTEIN, I. N., GEL'FAND, I. M., AND GEL'FAND, S. I. Schubert cells, and the cohomology of the
spaces G/P. Uspehi Mat. Nauk 28, 3(171) (1973), 3–26.
[8] BIELAWSKI, R. On the hyperkahler metrics associated to singularities of nilpotent varieties. Ann. Global
Anal. Geom. 14, 2 (1996), 177–191.
[9] BIELAWSKI, R. Lie groups, Nahm's equations and hyperkahler manifolds. In Algebraic groups. Univer-
sitatsverlag G ottingen, G ottingen, 2007, pp. 1–17.
[10] BIELAWSKI, R. Reducible spectral curves and the hyperkahler geometry of adjoint orbits. J. Lond. Math.
Soc. (2) 76, 3 (2007), 719–738.
[11] BIQUARD, O. Sur les ´equations de Nahm et la structure de Poisson des alg`ebres de Lie semi-simples
complexes. Math. Ann. 304, 2 (1996), 253–276.
[12] BORHO, W., AND MACPHERSON, R. Repr´esentations des groupes de Weyl et homologie d'intersection
pour les vari´et´es nilpotentes. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´er. I Math. 292, 15 (1981), 707–710.
[13] BRIESKORN, E. Singular elements of semi-simple algebraic groups. In Actes du Congr`es International des
Math´ematiciens (Nice, 1970), Tome 2. Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1971, pp. 279–284.
[14] BRION, M. Equivariant cohomology and equivariant intersection theory. In Representation theories and
algebraic geometry (Montreal, PQ, 1997), vol. 514 of NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. C Math. Phys. Sci. Kluwer
Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 1998, pp. 1–37. Notes by Alvaro Rittatore.
[15] BUMP, D. Lie groups, vol. 225 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2004.
[16] CHRISS, N., AND GINZBURG, V. Representation theory and complex geometry. Modern Birkhauser Clas-
sics. Birkhauser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2010. Reprint of the 1997 edition.
[17] COLLINGWOOD, D. H., AND MCGOVERN, W. M. Nilpotent orbits in semisimple Lie algebras. Van Nos-
trand Reinhold Mathematics Series. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, 1993.
[18] CROOKS, P., AND RAYAN, S. Some results on equivariant contact geometry for partial flag varieties.
Internat. J. Math. 27, 8 (2016), 1650066, 13pp.
[19] D'AMORIM SANTA-CRUZ, S. Twistor geometry for hyper-Kahler metrics on complex adjoint orbits.
Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 15, 4 (1997), 361–377.
[20] DANCER, A. S. Hyperkahler manifolds. In Surveys in differential geometry: essays on Einstein manifolds,
vol. 6 of Surv. Differ. Geom. Int. Press, Boston, MA, 1999, pp. 15–38.
[21] DIGNE, F., AND MICHEL, J. Representations of finite groups of Lie type, vol. 21 of London Mathematical
Society Student Texts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.
[22] FRITZSCHE, K., AND GRAUERT, H. From holomorphic functions to complex manifolds, vol. 213 of Graduate
Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002.
[23] FU, B. A survey on symplectic singularities and symplectic resolutions. Ann. Math. Blaise Pascal 13, 2
(2006), 209–236.
[24] FU, B., AND NAMIKAWA, Y. Uniqueness of crepant resolutions and symplectic singularities. Ann. Inst.
Fourier (Grenoble) 54, 1 (2004), 1–19.
[25] FULTON, W. Young tableaux, vol. 35 of London Mathematical Society Student Texts. Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, 1997. With applications to representation theory and geometry.
[26] GASPARIM, E., GRAMA, L., AND SAN MARTIN, L. A. B. Symplectic Lefschetz fibrations on adjoint
orbits. Forum Math. 28, 5 (2016), 967–979.
[27] GERSTENHABER, M. On dominance and varieties of commuting matrices. Ann. of Math. (2) 73 (1961),
324–348.
[28] GINZBURG, V., AND KALEDIN, D. Poisson deformations of symplectic quotient singularities. Adv.
Math. 186, 1 (2004), 1–57.
[29] GIVENTAL, A. B. Homological geometry and mirror symmetry. In Proceedings of the International Con-
gress of Mathematicians, Vol. 1, 2 (Z urich, 1994) (1995), Birkhauser, Basel, pp. 472–480.
[30] GRAHAM, W. Positivity in equivariant Schubert calculus. Duke Math. J. 109, 3 (2001), 599–614.
[31] GRAHAM, W. A. Functions on the universal cover of the principal nilpotent orbit. Invent. Math. 108, 1
(1992), 15–27.
[32] GUILLEMIN, V., HOLM, T., AND ZARA, C. A GKM description of the equivariant cohomology ring of
a homogeneous space. J. Algebraic Combin. 23, 1 (2006), 21–41.
[33] HESSELINK, W. Singularities in the nilpotent scheme of a classical group. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 222
(1976), 1–32.
37
[34] HOCHSCHILD, G. P. Basic theory of algebraic groups and Lie algebras, vol. 75 of Graduate Texts in Mathe-
matics. Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1981.
[35] HORI, K., AND VAFA, C. Mirror Symmetry. arxiv:hep-th/0002222 (2000), 91 pages.
[36] HUMPHREYS, J. E. Linear algebraic groups. Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1975. Graduate Texts
in Mathematics, No. 21.
[37] HUMPHREYS, J. E. Conjugacy classes in semisimple algebraic groups, vol. 43 of Mathematical Surveys and
Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1995.
[38] JANTZEN, J. C. Nilpotent orbits in representation theory. In Lie theory, vol. 228 of Progr. Math.
Birkhauser Boston, Boston, MA, 2004, pp. 1–211.
[39] KALEDIN, D. Symplectic singularities from the Poisson point of view. J. Reine Angew. Math. 600 (2006),
135–156.
[40] KNAPP, A. W. Lie groups beyond an introduction, second ed., vol. 140 of Progress in Mathematics.
Birkhauser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2002.
[41] KOBAK, P. Z., AND SWANN, A. Classical nilpotent orbits as hyperkahler quotients. Internat. J. Math. 7,
2 (1996), 193–210.
[42] KOSTANT, B. The principal three-dimensional subgroup and the Betti numbers of a complex simple
Lie group. Amer. J. Math. 81 (1959), 973–1032.
[43] KOSTANT, B. Lie group representations on polynomial rings. Amer. J. Math. 85 (1963), 327–404.
[44] KOVALEV, A. G. Nahm's equations and complex adjoint orbits. Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 47, 185
(1996), 41–58.
[45] KRAFT, H., AND PROCESI, C. Closures of conjugacy classes of matrices are normal. Invent. Math. 53, 3
(1979), 227–247.
[46] KRONHEIMER, P. B. A hyper-Kahlerian structure on coadjoint orbits of a semisimple complex group.
J. London Math. Soc. (2) 42, 2 (1990), 193–208.
[47] KRONHEIMER, P. B. Instantons and the geometry of the nilpotent variety. J. Differential Geom. 32, 2
(1990), 473–490.
[48] LEBRUN, C., AND SALAMON, S. Strong rigidity of positive quaternion-Kahler manifolds. Invent. Math.
118, 1 (1994), 109–132.
[49] LUKE, G. L., Ed. Representation theory of Lie groups (1979), vol. 34 of London Mathematical Society Lecture
Note Series, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge-New York.
[50] MIHALCEA, L. C. On equivariant quantum cohomology of homogeneous spaces: Chevalley formulae
and algorithms. Duke Math. J. 140, 2 (2007), 321–350.
[51] SCHMITT, A. H. W. Geometric invariant theory and decorated principal bundles. Zurich Lectures in Ad-
vanced Mathematics. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Z urich, 2008.
[52] SLODOWY, P. Simple singularities and simple algebraic groups, vol. 815 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics.
Springer, Berlin, 1980.
[53] SOMMERS, E. A generalization of the Bala-Carter theorem for nilpotent orbits. Internat. Math. Res.
Notices, 11 (1998), 539–562.
[54] SOMMERS, E. Lusztig's canonical quotient and generalized duality. J. Algebra 243, 2 (2001), 790–812.
[55] SPRINGER, T. A. A construction of representations of Weyl groups. Invent. Math. 44, 3 (1978), 279–293.
[56] SWANN, A. Hyperkahler and quaternionic Kahler geometry. Math. Ann. 289, 3 (1991), 421–450.
[57] TAUVEL, P., AND YU, R. W. T. Lie algebras and algebraic groups. Springer Monographs in Mathematics.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005.
[58] VILLUMSEN, M. Cohomogeneity-three hyperKahler metrics on nilpotent orbits. Ann. Global Anal.
Geom. 28, 2 (2005), 123–156.
[59] WHITEHEAD, G. W. Elements of homotopy theory, vol. 61 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-
Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1978.
INSTITUTE OF DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, GOTTFRIED WILHELM LEIBNIZ UNIVERSIT AT HANNOVER,
WELFENGARTEN 1, 30167 HANNOVER, GERMANY
E-mail address: [email protected]
38
|
1607.08705 | 1 | 1607 | 2016-07-29T07:06:24 | Polynomials nonnegative on the cylinder | [
"math.AG"
] | In 2010, Marshall settled the strip conjecture, according to which every polynomial in $\mathbb{R}[x,y]$, nonnegative on the strip $[-1,1]\times\mathbb{R}$, is a sum of squares and of squares times $1-x^2$. We consider affine nonsingular curves $C$ over $\mathbb{R}$ with $C(\mathbb{R})$ compact, and study the question whether every $f$ in $\mathbb{R}[C][y]$, nonnegative on $C(\mathbb{R})\times\mathbb{R}$, is a sum of squares in $\mathbb{R}[C][y]$. We give an affirmative answer under the condition that $f$ has only finitely many zeros in $C(\mathbb{R})\times\mathbb{R}$. For $C$ the circle $x_1^2+x_2^2=1$, we prove the result unconditionally. | math.AG | math |
POLYNOMIALS NONNEGATIVE ON THE CYLINDER
CLAUS SCHEIDERER, SEBASTIAN WENZEL
Abstract. In 2010, Marshall settled the strip conjecture, according to which
every polynomial in R[x, y], nonnegative on the strip [−1, 1] × R, is a sum of
squares and of squares times 1 − x2. We consider affine nonsingular curves C
over R with C(R) compact, and study the question whether every f in R[C][y],
nonnegative on C(R)× R, is a sum of squares in R[C][y]. We give an affirmative
answer under the condition that f has only finitely many zeros in C(R) × R.
For C the circle x2
2 = 1, we prove the result unconditionally.
1 + x2
Introduction
A couple of years ago, Murray Marshall [3] proved that every polynomial f ∈
R[x, y], nonnegative on the strip [−1, 1] × R ⊆ R2, can be written in the form
f = s + (1 − x2)t, where s, t ∈ R[x, y] are sums of squares of polynomials. As soon
as his result became known, it caused quite a bit of excitement among the experts.
The question had been a well-known open problem for several years. It originated
in a false claim made in 2001, for which the first author of this present paper was
responsible. At the very end of [4], it was announced that a forthcoming paper
would contain a proof of the above statement. Soon after [4] had gone into print,
the intended proof broke down, after which the question became known as the strip
conjecture. In the years to follow, many people tried in vain to solve the problem.
When Murray surprised us with his success, it was with great joy and admiration
that we studied his elegant arguments.
This paper builds on his ideas. Our initial goal had been to replace the interval
I = [−1, 1] by a nonsingular compact real curve C(R), and to show that every
polynomial f ∈ R[C][y], nonnegative on C(R) × R, is a sum of squares in R[C][y].
However, in this generality we did not succeed. Following the overall strategy of
Murray's argument, there are several points where new ideas are required. A major
problem arises from the lack of unique factorization in R[C]. This prevents us from
reducing to the case where f has only finitely many zeros in C(R) × R. In general
we were unable to overcome this difficulty, and so we have to assume that the zero
set of f in C(R) × R is finite. When the curve C is rational, the divisor class group
is small enough to get around this point, using a homological argument. For C the
circle curve, we can therefore prove the full statement without restriction.
The two main results of this paper are thus:
Theorem 1. Let C be a nonsingular affine curve over R with C(R) compact. Let
V = C × A1, and let f ∈ R[V ] = R[C][y]. If f ≥ 0 on V (R) = C(R) × R, and if f
has only finitely many zeros, then f is a sum of squares in R[V ].
Theorem 2. Let C be the plane affine curve over R with equation x2
2 = 1,
and let V = C × A1. Then every f ∈ R[V ] with f ≥ 0 on V (R) is a sum of squares
in R[V ].
1 + x2
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 14P05; secondary 14P10, 14P99.
Key words and phrases. Positive polynomials, sums of squares, real algebraic surfaces.
1
2
CLAUS SCHEIDERER, SEBASTIAN WENZEL
The proof of Theorem 1 (resp. Theorem 2) is given in Section 1 (resp. Section 2).
We also present a generalized version of Theorem 1 that applies to polynomials non-
negative on K × R, where K is a compact semi-algebraic subset of a nonsingular
curve. See Corollary 1.19 for the precise statement. We conjecture that Theo-
rem 1 holds unconditionally for every f ∈ R[V ] nonnegative on V (R), even if f has
infinitely many real zeros.
The results of this paper are largely contained in the second author's doctoral
thesis [8]. The thesis contains other generalizations of the strip theorem that we
plan to publish elsewhere.
1. Proof of Theorem 1
1.1. Marshall's strip theorem [3] provides the first example of a two-dimensional
semi-algebraic set K ⊆ Rn for which the saturated preorder
P(K) = {f ∈ R[x] : f K ≥ 0}
is finitely generated and the ring B(K) ⊆ R[x]/IK of bounded polynomial functions
on K has transcendence degree ≤ 1. (Here IK ⊆ R[x] is the ideal of polynomials
vanishing on K). Indeed, a polynomial in R[x, y] is bounded on [−1, 1] × R if and
only if it lies in R[x]. To put this remark into perspective, recall [5] that P(K)
can never be finitely generated when dim(K) ≥ 3. Examples of two-dimensional
sets K with P(K) finitely generated are known since about 2004, see [7]. But all
these examples were either compact, or derived from some compact set in a simple
manner. In particular, all these examples carried plenty of bounded polynomials, in
the sense that the ring B(K) had full transcendence degree two. Before Marshall's
theorem, it was not known whether such examples could exist with trdeg B(K) ≤ 1.
1.2. Our proof is inspired by the strategy of proof in [3], although the details are
different in several respects. Let I = [−1, 1], and let T be the preorder in R[x, y]
generated by 1 − x2. Let f ∈ R[x, y] with f ≥ 0 on I × R, say f = adyd + · · · + a0
with ai ∈ R[x] and ad 6= 0. To show f ∈ T , Marshall observes that the leading
coefficient ad is nonnegative on I. By a standard reparametrization argument he
can assume ad > 0 on I. Moreover, by extracting irreducible factors of f with
infinitely many zeros in I × R, he reduces to the case where f has only finitely
many zeros in I × R.
Neither step works in our situation. We are considering f ∈ R[C][y], where C
is a nonsingular affine curve and C(R) is compact, and we try to show that f ≥ 0
on C(R) × R implies that f is a sum of squares in R[C][y]. Both reduction steps
would essentially require unique factorization in R[C]. We get around the first step
by using a different approach, based on the Lojasiewicz inequality. But we have to
make it an assumption that the zero set of f is finite.
After the initial reduction steps, the key idea in [3] is to find a nonzero product
p(x)s(y) of two polynomials, with variables separated, for which 0 ≤ p(x)s(y) ≤
f (x, y) holds on I ×R. This creates enough room for approximation: One first solves
the problem in polynomials whose coefficients are analytic locally around x ∈ I, and
then uses a refined Weierstrass approximation argument to get a global polynomial
solution. Our proof essentially follows this approach, although the details need to
be modified, in particular since we cannot guarantee strict positivity of the leading
coefficient.
1.3. Let always C be a nonsingular affine curve over R whose set C(R) of R-points
is compact and non-empty. Any p ∈ R[C] with p ≥ 0 on C(R) is a sum of squares
in R[C], by [6] Theorem 4.15). The affine surface V = C × A1 has coordinate
ring R[V ] = R[C][y], the polynomial ring over R[C] in the variable y. We will
often express elements 0 6= f ∈ R[V ] in the form f = Pd
i=0 aiyi with d ≥ 0,
POLYNOMIALS NONNEGATIVE ON THE CYLINDER
3
ai ∈ R[C] and ad 6= 0. In this case we write d = degy(f ) and refer to ad ∈ R[C]
as the leading coefficient of f . The zero set of f in V (R) = C(R) × R is denoted
Z(f ) = {z ∈ V (R) : f (z) = 0}.
Lemma 1.4. Let 0 6= f ∈ R[V ] with f ≥ 0 on V (R), let d = degy(f ), and let
a ∈ R[C] be the leading coefficient of f .
(a) d is even, and a ≥ 0 on C(R).
(b) If a > 0 on C(R), then Z(f ) is compact.
Proof. For any x ∈ C(R) with a(x) 6= 0, restrict f to the line {x} × R ⊆ V (R) to
see that d is even and a(x) > 0. Therefore a ≥ 0 on C(R) by continuity. If a > 0 on
C(R), there is a real constant c > 0 with a ≥ c on C(R). All zeros α of a polynomial
Pd
i=0 ai. Since the coefficients of
f are bounded on C(R), it is therefore clear that Z(f ) is compact.
(cid:3)
i=0 aiyi in R[y] with ad 6= 0 satisfy α ≤ 1
ad Pd
Let f ∈ R[V ] be nonnegative on V (R) with Z(f ) finite. In the next two lemmas
we show that f can be bounded from below by a product of sums of squares with
separated variables. Other than in [3] (Lemmas 4.1 and 4.2), we cannot arrange
the leading coefficient of f to be strictly positive. So we have to argue along a
different line. Recall that a function C(R) → R is called semi-algebraic if its graph
is a semi-algebraic subset of C(R) × R.
Lemma 1.5. Let g : C(R) → R be a continuous semi-algebraic function with g(x) =
0 for only finitely many x ∈ C(R). Then there exists 0 6= p ∈ R[C] with p2 ≤ g on
C(R).
Proof. Let Z(g) = {x ∈ C(R) : g(x) = 0}, and choose 0 6= q ∈ R[C] with q(x) = 0
for every x ∈ Z(g). By the semi-algebraic Lojasiewicz inequality ([1] Corollary
2.6.7) there exist an integer N ≥ 1 and a real constant c > 0 with qN ≤ cg on
C(R). Enlarging c if necessary we can assume that N = 2n is even. So we can take
p = sqn, for s > 0 a small real number.
(cid:3)
Lemma 1.6. Let f ∈ R[V ] = R[C][y] with f ≥ 0 on V (R) and degy(f ) = d, and
assume Z(f ) < ∞. Given any polynomial s ∈ R[y] with degy(s) = d, there exists
0 6= p ∈ R[C] such that f (x, y) ≥ p(x)2s(y) for all (x, y) ∈ C(R) × R.
Proof. By adding a positive constant to s we may assume that s > 0 on C(R).
Consider R with its natural embedding in P1(R) = R ∪ {∞}. Since f and s have
the same y-degree, the map C(R) × R → R, (x, y) 7→ f (x,y)
s(y) extends to a continuous
map φ : C(R) × P1(R) → R, namely by φ(x, ∞) = ad(x)
i=0 ai(x)yi,
bd
s(y) = Pd
if f (x, y) = Pd
i=0 biyi. For x ∈ C(R) put
g(x) := infn f (x, y)
s(y)
: y ∈ Ro = min(cid:8)φ(x, y) : y ∈ P1(R)(cid:9).
Then g : C(R) → R is a well-defined function with semi-algebraic graph. From the
second description it is easy to see that g is continuous. The zeros of g in C(R)
are the zeros of ad ∈ R[C], together with the projection of Z(f ) ⊆ C(R) × R to
C(R). Hence g has only finitely many zeros in C(R), and clearly g ≥ 0 on C(R).
By Lemma 1.5 there exists 0 6= p ∈ R[C] with p2 ≤ g on C(R). This is the
assertion.
(cid:3)
1.7. In the following let O0 denote the ring of convergent real power series Pi≥0 aixi
in one variable. This is a (henselian) discrete valuation ring with residue field R.
As usual, an element f of a ring A is said to be psd (positive semidefinite) in A if f
is nonnegative on the real spectrum of A. By the abstract Nichtnegativstellensatz,
4
CLAUS SCHEIDERER, SEBASTIAN WENZEL
it is equivalent that there is an identity sf = f 2n + t with n ≥ 0 and s, t sums of
squares in A. For the ring A = O0[y], a polynomial f (x, y) = Pd
i=0 ai(x)yi with
coefficients ai ∈ O0 is psd in O0[y] if and only if there exists ε > 0 such that f is
defined and nonnegative on ]−ε, ε[ × R.
The following lemma is a particular case of [5] Lemma 1.8:
Lemma 1.8. Every psd element of the polynomial ring O0[y] is a sum of squares
in O0[y].
(cid:3)
Remark 1.9. Lemma 1.8 is a stronger version of [3] Lemma 4.3, in that we allow
the leading coefficient of the polynomial to lie in the maximal ideal of O0. One can
in fact show that every psd element in O0[y] is a sum of two squares, generalizing
also the quantitative part of [3] Lemma 4.3. We skip the argument since this fact
will not be needed.
1.10. On C(R) there is a natural structure of one-dimensional real analytic mani-
fold. For any open subset U ⊆ C(R), let O(U ) denote the ring of analytic functions
U → R. Given finitely many points P1, . . . , Pr in C(R), let A(P1, . . . , Pr) denote
the ring of all continuous functions C(R) → R that are real analytic in suitable
neighborhoods of P1, . . . , Pr.
Lemma 1.11. Given P1, . . . , Pr ∈ C(R), any f ∈ R[V ] with f ≥ 0 on V (R) is a
sum of squares in the polynomial ring A[y], where A = A(P1, . . . , Pr).
Here we consider R[V ] = R[C][y] as a subring of the polynomial ring A[y] in the
natural way.
Proof. Fix a point P ∈ C(R). By Lemma 1.8 there exists an open neighborhood
U of P in C(R) such that the restriction of f to U × R is a sum of squares in
O(U )[y]. Hence there exists a finite covering C(R) = U1 ∪ · · · ∪ Um by open sets,
together with a sum of squares decomposition of f Ui×R in the ring O(Ui)[y], for
every i = 1, . . . , m. We can arrange that m ≥ r and Pi ∈ Ui, Pi /∈ Uj for i 6= j and
1 ≤ i ≤ r, 1 ≤ j ≤ m. Let βi : C(R) → [0, 1] (i = 1, . . . , m) be continuous functions
forming a partition of unity and satisfying supp(βi) ⊆ Ui for all i. Now we take
the weighted sum of the sum of squares representations of f Ui×R in O(Ui)[y], using
the βi as weights. The resulting identity is a sum of squares decomposition of f in
A[y].
(cid:3)
Fix a sum of squares decomposition of f in A[y], as in Lemma 1.11. The involved
polynomials have coefficients that are elements of A. We want to approximate these
coefficients by regular functions on C. To do this we need some preparations.
1.12. Let R[y]≤m be the space of real polynomials of degree at most m. If f =
Pm
i=0 aiyi with ai ∈ R, we write c(f ) = max{ai : i = 0, . . . , m} and f =
max{f (t) : − 1 ≤ t ≤ 1}. Since any two norms on R[y]≤m are equivalent, there
exist real numbers αm, βm > 0 such that f ≤ αmc(f ) and c(f ) ≤ βmf for
every f ∈ R[y]≤m. Clearly one may take αm = m + 1. A concrete value for βm
can be deduced easily from Markov's inequality f ′ ≤ m2f . For f, g ∈ R[y]≤m,
note that c(f g) ≤ (m + 1)c(f )c(g).
i=1 f 2
i , g = Pk
i=1 g2
Lemma 1.13. For i = 1, . . . , k, let fi, gi ∈ R[y] be of degree ≤ m, and let f =
Pk
i . If ε ≥ 0 is such that c(gi − fi) ≤ ε for i = 1, . . . , k, then
c(g − f ) ≤ (m + 1)kε · (cid:16)ε + 2βmpf (cid:17).
i − f 2
Proof. See 1.12 for notation. Fix i ∈ {1, . . . , k}. Using g2
we get
i = (gi − fi)(gi + fi)
c(g2
i − f 2
i ) ≤ (m + 1) c(gi − fi) c(gi + fi) ≤ (m + 1)ε · (cid:0)ε + 2c(fi)(cid:1)
POLYNOMIALS NONNEGATIVE ON THE CYLINDER
5
Since c(fi) ≤ βmfi and fi2 ≤ f , this implies
c(g2
i − f 2
i ) ≤ (m + 1)ε · (ε + 2βmpf ).
i ).
i − f 2
Now the assertion follows using c(g − f ) ≤ Pk
Lemma 1.14. Let P1, . . . , Pr ∈ C(R), and let ϕ, ψ ∈ A = A(P1, . . . , Pr) be such
that ψ − ϕ is nonnegative on C(R) and vanishes at most in P1, . . . , Pr. Then there
exists a regular function p ∈ R[C] with ϕ ≤ p ≤ ψ on C(R).
i=1 c(g2
(cid:3)
Proof. This is similar to Lemma 4.5 in [3]. If ϕ < ψ on C(R), the assertion follows
from Weierstrass approximation. Otherwise one proceeds by induction on r. Let
P ∈ C(R) with ϕ(P ) = ψ(P ), and let 2k > 0 be the vanishing order of ψ − ϕ at
P (note that ψ − ϕ is analytic locally around P ). There exists t ∈ R[C] such that
t has vanishing order two at P and t > 0 on C(R) r {P }. Moreover there exists
q ∈ R[C] such that ϕ − q and ψ − q vanish at P of order ≥ 2k. Hence we can define
real functions a, b on C(R) by
a(x) =
ϕ(x) − q(x)
t(x)k
,
b(x) =
ψ(x) − q(x)
t(x)k
(x ∈ C(R))
Clearly a, b ∈ A, we have a ≤ b on C(R), and a(P ) < b(P ). So by induction there
exists p′ ∈ R[C] with a ≤ p′ ≤ b on C(R). Hence p := tkp′ + q will do the job. (cid:3)
Lemma 1.15. Let f ∈ R[V ] with f ≥ 0 on V (R) and degy(f ) = d. Then for any
0 6= p ∈ R[C] with p ≥ 0 on C(R), there is a decomposition f = g + Pd
i=0 aiyi,
where g ∈ R[V ] is a sum of squares in R[V ] and a0, . . . , ad ∈ R[C] satisfy ai ≤ p,
pointwise on C(R).
Proof. Let A = A(P1, . . . , Pr) be the ring of 1.10, where P1, . . . , Pr ∈ C(R) are the
real zeros of p. The degree d is even, say d = 2m. By Lemma 1.11 there is a sum
of squares decomposition f = f 2
1 + · · · + f 2
k with fi ∈ A[y], say
m
fi =
bijyj
X
j=0
with bij ∈ A. Let λ > 0 be a real parameter that will be adjusted later. By Lemma
1.14 there exist regular functions qij ∈ R[C] such that (cid:12)(cid:12)qij − bij(cid:12)(cid:12) ≤ λp on C(R), for
1 ≤ i ≤ k and 0 ≤ j ≤ m. Put
gi :=
m
X
j=0
qij yj
k ∈ R[V ] and write f − g = Pd
(i = 1, . . . , k), let g := g2
i=0 aiyi with
ai ∈ R[C]. We can estimate the ai as follows. Let γ > 0 be a real number such
that f (x, y) ≤ γ2 for x ∈ C(R) and y ≤ 1. Using Lemma 1.13 we get
1 + · · · + g2
ai(x) ≤ (m + 1)k · λp(x) · (cid:16)λp(x) + 2βmγ(cid:17),
x ∈ C(R).
For λ > 0 sufficiently small, the right hand side is less or equal to p(x), uniformly
for all x ∈ C(R). This proves the lemma.
(cid:3)
1.16. We now give the proof of Theorem 1. So let C be a nonsingular affine curve
over R with C(R) compact, and let V = C × A1. Let f ∈ R[V ] with f ≥ 0 on
V (R) and with only finitely many zeros in V (R), and let degy(f ) = 2m. Fix a
strictly positive polynomial s ∈ R[y] with deg(s) = 2m, for example s = y2m + 1.
6
CLAUS SCHEIDERER, SEBASTIAN WENZEL
By Lemma 1.6 there exists a sum of squares p 6= 0 in R[C] with ps ≤ f on V (R).
Let
2m
m
t :=
yi + 2
X
i=0
X
j=0
y2j = 3 + y + 3y2 + y3 + · · · + 3y2m,
a polynomial in R[y] with deg(t) = 2m. There is a real number c > 0 such that
the polynomial s − ct is nonnegative (and hence a sum of squares) in R[y], since s
is strictly positive and deg(t) = deg(s). By Lemma 1.15, applied to f − ps ∈ R[V ]
and c
3 p ∈ R[C], there is a sum of squares g in R[V ] such that
f − ps = g +
2m
X
i=0
biyi
with bi ∈ R[C] for which 3bi ≤ cp holds on C(R) (i = 0, . . . , 2m). We now
mimick Marshall's marvelous decomposition (last two pages of [3]), thereby proving
that f is a sum of squares: We have f = g + h1 + h2 where h1 = (s − ct)p and
h2 = ctp + P2m
i=0 biyi. Clearly h1 is a sum of squares in R[y]. And h2 is a sum of
squares in R[V ], since h2 is the sum of the following polynomials:
b0 − b1 + 2cp, (cid:16)b2m − b2m−1 + 2cp(cid:17)y2m,
(cid:16)bi + cp(cid:17) yi−1(1 + y + y2)
(cid:16)bi − bi−1 − bi+1 + cp(cid:17)yi
(for 0 < i < 2m, i odd),
(for 0 < i < 2m, i even).
Each of these is a psd polynomial in y, times an element of R[C] that is nonnegative
on C(R) (and that is hence, by [6], a sum of squares in R[C]). The reason is
3bi ≤ cp on C(R) for all i. Theorem 1 is proved.
(cid:3)
Remark 1.17. In Theorem 1 we may relax the hypothesis by allowing the curve C
to have singularities in nonreal points. The proof given above carries over verbatim
to this more general case.
1.18. Generalizing the setup of Theorem 1, one may ask if the compact curve C(R)
can be replaced by a compact semi-algebraic set K on some curve. Hereby sums of
squares need to be replaced by elements of a suitable preorder. Such generalizations
are indeed possible, as we'll indicate now. We are content with a straightforward
formulation and do not strive for the most general version.
Let C be a nonsingular affine curve over R, and let K ⊆ C(R) be a compact
semi-algebraic subset without isolated points. By [6] Theorem 5.22, the saturated
preorder
P(K) := (cid:8)p ∈ R[C] : p ≥ 0 on K(cid:9)
in R[C] can be generated by a single element h ∈ R[C].
Indeed, there exists
h ∈ R[C] with K = {x ∈ C(R) : h(x) ≥ 0} such that h has vanishing order 1
at every boundary point of K, and has no other zeros in C(R). Any such h will
generate the preorder P(K) in R[C], according to [6].
Corollary 1.19. Let C be a nonsingular affine curve over R, and let K ⊆ C(R)
be a compact semi-algebraic set without isolated points. Let h ∈ R[C] generate the
preorder P(K) in R[C]. If f ∈ R[C × A1] = R[C][y] satisfies f ≥ 0 on K × R,
and if f has only finitely many zeros in K × R, there are sums of squares g0, g1 in
R[C][y] such that f = g0 + g1h.
Proof. Corollary 1.19 could be proved by inspecting each step in the proof of Theo-
rem 1 and replacing it a suitably generalized version. It is however easier to obtain
1.19 as a direct corollary to Theorem 1:
POLYNOMIALS NONNEGATIVE ON THE CYLINDER
7
Let C′ be the affine curve with coordinate ring R[C′] = R[C][z]/(z2 − h), and let
C′ → C be the natural morphism. Then f , considered as an element of C′[y], is
nonnegative on C′(R) × R and has only finitely many zeros there. Since the curve
C′ has no real singularities, it follows from Theorem 1 (observe Remark 1.17) that
f is a sum of squares in R[C′]. So we have f = Pi(ai + biz)2 with ai, bi ∈ R[C][y]
(and z2 = h). Expanding this expression shows f = Pi a2
i in R[C]. (cid:3)
i + hPi b2
2. Proof of Theorem 2
In the following let C be the plane real curve with equation x2
C ×A1, so R[V ] = R[C][y] is the polynomial ring over R[C] = R[x1, x2]/(x2
1 +x2
2 = 1. Let V =
2−1).
1 +x2
Lemma 2.1. Let 0 6= p ∈ R[C] with p ≥ 0 on C(R). There exist p1, p2 ∈ R[C],
both nonnegative on C(R), with p = p1p2 and such that p1 has only real zeros on
C, while p2 has no real zeros.
Proof. Let ξ ∈ C(R) with p(ξ) = 0. The vanishing order of p at ξ is even, so by
induction it suffices to show that there exists q ∈ R[C] with a double zero in ξ and
with no other zeros in C. But this is clear, one can take q to be the tangent to C
at ξ.
(cid:3)
Note that there is no analogue of Lemma 2.1 when the curve C has positive
genus.
i with hi ∈ R[V ]. Since b has only real zeros, we
(cid:3)
Lemma 2.2. Let f ∈ R[V ] and b ∈ R[C] be sums of squares, and assume that b
has only real zeros on C. If there is g ∈ R[V ] with f = bg, then g is a sum of
squares in R[V ] as well.
Proof. We have b2g = bf = Pi h2
have hi = bgi for suitable gi ∈ R[V ], see [5] Lemma 0.2, and so g = Pi g2
i .
2.3. We need a small argument involving divisor class groups. Let X be an irre-
ducible variety over a field k. By Cl(X) we denote the codimension one Chow group
of X, i.e. the group of Weil divisors on X modulo rational equivalence. As usual
let Pic(X) be the Picard group of Cartier divisors on X modulo linear equivalence.
There is a natural map Pic(X) → Cl(X) which in general is neither injective nor
surjective. When X is nonsingular (or more generally locally factorial), the map
Pic(X) → Cl(X) is a group isomorphism. See e.g. [2] section 2.1 for these notions
and facts.
2.4. We only need these concepts for nonsingular irreducible varieties X over k = R.
Given such X let Div(X) be the group of Weil divisors on X, i.e. the free abelian
group on the irreducible codimension one subvarieties Y (called prime divisors)
of X. A prime divisor Y is said to be real if Y (R) is Zariski dense in Y , otherwise
i=1 Yi on X with prime divisors Y1, . . . , Yr,
nonreal. Given a Weil divisor D = Pr
we let D(R) = Sr
Lemma 2.5. Let C be the plane affine curve x2
2 = 1 over R. Any Weil divisor
D ≥ 0 on V = C × A1 for which D(R) is compact is rationally equivalent to zero.
i=1 Yi(R).
1 + x2
Proof. Pullback of divisors via the projection map C × A1 → C induces a group
isomorphism Cl(C) ∼→ Cl(C × A1), see [2] Theorem 3.3. The inverse map Cl(C ×
A1) → Cl(C) is given by intersecting a divisor on C × A1 with the 1-cycle C × {ξ},
for ξ ∈ A1(R) = R an arbitrary point (see [2] 3.3.1). Hence the class of the divisor
D in the assertion is a 2-fold in Cl(V ). Since Cl(V ) ∼= Cl(C) = Z/2, this proves
the claim.
(cid:3)
8
CLAUS SCHEIDERER, SEBASTIAN WENZEL
2.6. We give the proof of Theorem 2. Let f = f (x, y) ∈ R[V ] with f ≥ 0 on V (R).
We have to show that f is a sum of squares in R[V ]. Write f = Pd
i=0 aiyi with
ai ∈ R[C] and ad 6= 0. By Lemma 1.4, d is even and ad ≥ 0 on C(R). By Lemma
2.1 we can write ad = bc with b, c ∈ R[C], such that b has only real zeros on C,
and such that b ≥ 0 and c > 0 on C(R). Multiplying f with bd−1 gives
b(x)d−1f (x, y) = g(x, b(x)y),
where g ∈ R[V ] is defined by g = cyd + Pd−1
i=0 aibd−1−iyi. Clearly, g ≥ 0 on V (R)
as well, and the leading coefficient c of g is strictly positive on C(R). It suffices to
prove that g is a sum of squares in R[V ]. Indeed, this implies that bd−1f is a sum
of squares in R[V ], and by Lemma 2.2 we conclude that f itself is a sum of squares
in R[V ].
(x, y) ∈ C(R) × R,
So we can assume that the leading coefficient of f is strictly positive on C(R).
By Lemma 1.4(b), the real zero set Z(f ) ⊆ V (R) of f is compact. For every real
prime divisor Y on V , the vanishing order of f along Y is even. Therefore we can
decompose the Weil divisor div(f ) on V as div(f ) = 2D + E, in such a way that
every irreducible component of D is real and every irreducible component of E is
nonreal (see 2.4).
Since Z(f ) is compact, it follows that D(R) is compact as well. By Lemma 2.5
(and since Pic(V ) ∼= Cl(V )), this implies that D = div(g) for some rational function
g 6= 0 on V . Since V is nonsingular, hence normal, we have g ∈ R[V ]. This means
we have a product decomposition f = g2h with g, h ∈ R[V ], and every irreducible
component of div(h) = E is nonreal. Therefore h has only finitely many zeros in
V (R). By Theorem 1, h is a sum of squares in R[V ]. Hence so is f , and Theorem 2
is proved.
(cid:3)
Remark 2.7. Theorem 2 provides the first example of an affine algebraic surface V
over R for which psd = sos holds in R[V ], and for which the ring B(V ) ⊆ R[V ] of
bounded polynomials has trdeg B(V ) ≤ 1 (c.f. Remark 1.1).
We may generalize Theorem 2 slightly:
Corollary 2.8. Let X be any nonsingular affine rational curve over R for which
X(R) is compact. Then psd = sos holds on the surface X × A1.
Proof. For X(R) = ∅ the assertion is clear. The only examples of such X with
X(R) 6= ∅ are of the form X = C r Z where Z is a finite set of nonreal closed
points of C (and Z is conjugation-invariant, depending on the view point). Choose
h ∈ R[C] such that Z is the set of zeros of h in C. Then R[X] = R[C]h, the ring of
fractions. If f ∈ R[X × A1] = (R[C]h)[y] is nonnegative on X(R) × R, write f = g
hr
with r ≥ 0 even and g ∈ R[C][y]. Then g ≥ 0 on C(R) × R, so g is a sum of squares
in R[C][y] by Theorem 2. Hence f is a sum of squares in R[X × A1].
(cid:3)
References
[1] J. Bochnak, M. Coste, M.-F. Roy: Real Algebraic Geometry. Erg. Math. Grenzgeb. (3)
36, Springer, Berlin, 1998.
[2] W. Fulton: Intersection Theory. Second edition. Erg. Math. Grenzgeb. (3) 2, Springer,
Berlin, 1998.
[3] M. Marshall: Polynomials non-negative on a strip. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 138, 1559 -- 1567
(2010).
[4] V. Powers, C. Scheiderer: The moment problem for non-compact semialgebraic sets. Adv.
Geom. 1, 71 -- 88 (2001).
[5] C. Scheiderer: Sums of squares of regular functions on real algebraic varieties. Trans. Am.
Math. Soc. 352, 1039 -- 1069 (1999).
[6] C. Scheiderer: Sums of squares on real algebraic curves. Math. Z. 245, 725 -- 760 (2003).
[7] C. Scheiderer: Sums of squares on real algebraic surfaces. Manuscr. math. 119, 395 -- 410
(2006).
POLYNOMIALS NONNEGATIVE ON THE CYLINDER
9
[8] S. Wenzel: Preorderings in dimension 2. Ph. D. thesis, Univ. Konstanz, 2015.
Fachbereich Mathematik und Statistik, Universitat Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Ger-
many
E-mail address: [email protected], [email protected]
|
1106.0096 | 3 | 1106 | 2012-03-29T19:03:46 | The Phase Limit Set of a Variety | [
"math.AG",
"math.CV"
] | A coamoeba is the image of a subvariety of a complex torus under the argument map to the real torus. We describe the structure of the boundary of the coamoeba of a variety, which we relate to its logarithmic limit set. Detailed examples of lines in three-dimensional space illustrate and motivate these results. | math.AG | math |
THE PHASE LIMIT SET OF A VARIETY
MOUNIR NISSE AND FRANK SOTTILE
Abstract. A coamoeba is the image of a subvariety of a complex torus under the argument
map to the real torus. We describe the structure of the boundary of the coamoeba of a variety,
which we relate to its logarithmic limit set. Detailed examples of lines in three-dimensional
space illustrate and motivate these results.
1. Introduction
A coamoeba is the image of a subvariety of a complex torus under the argument map to
the real torus. Coamoebae are cousins to amoebae, which are images of subvarieties under the
coordinatewise logarithm map z 7→ log z. Amoebae were introduced by Gelfand, Kapranov,
and Zelevinsky in 1994 [7], and have subsequently been widely studied [9, 10, 14, 15]. Coamoe-
bae were introduced by Passare in a talk in 2004, and they appear to have many beautiful and
interesting properties. For example, coamoebae of A-discriminants in dimension two are unions
of two non-convex polyhedra [11], and a hypersurface coamoeba has an associated arrangement
of codimension one tori contained in its closure [12].
Bergman [3] introduced the logarithmic limit set L ∞(X) of a subvariety X of the torus as
the set of limiting directions of points in its amoeba. Bieri and Groves [4] showed that L ∞(X)
is a rational polyhedral complex in the sphere. Logarithmic limit sets are now called tropical
algebraic varieties [16]. For a hypersurface V(f ), logarithmic limit set L ∞(V(f )) consists of
the directions of non-maximal cones in the outer normal fan of the Newton polytope of f .
We introduce a similar object for coamoebae and establish a structure theorem for coamoebae
similar to that of Bergman and of Bieri and Groves for amoebae.
Let coA (X) be the coamoeba of a subvariety X of (C∗)n with ideal I. The phase limit set of
X, P∞(X), is the set of accumulation points of arguments of sequences in X with unbounded
logarithm. For w ∈ Rn, the initial variety inwX ⊂ (C∗)n is the variety of the initial ideal of
I. The fundamental theorem of tropical geometry asserts that inwX 6= ∅ exactly when the
direction of −w lies in L ∞(X). We establish its analog for coamoebae.
Theorem 1. The closure of coA is coA (X) ∪ P∞(X), and
coA (inwX) .
P∞(X) = [w6=0
Johansson [8] used different methods to prove this when X is a complete intersection.
1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. 14T05, 32A60.
Research of Sottile supported in part by NSF grant DMS-1001615 and the Institut Mittag-Leffler.
1
2
MOUNIR NISSE AND FRANK SOTTILE
The cone over the logarithmic limit set admits the structure of a rational polyhedral fan Σ
in which all weights w in the relative interior of a cone σ ∈ Σ give the same initial scheme
inwX. Thus the union in Theorem 1 is finite and is indexed by the images of these cones σ
in the logarithmic limit set of X. The logarithmic limit set or tropical algebraic variety is
a combinatorial shadow of X encoding many properties of X. While the coamoeba of X is
typically not purely combinatorial (see the examples of lines in (C∗)3 in Section 3), the phase
limit set does provide a combinatorial skeleton which we believe will be useful in the further
study of coamoebae.
We give definitions and background in Section 2, and detailed examples of lines in three-
dimensional space in Section 3. These examples are reminiscent of the concrete descriptions of
amoebae of lines in [18]. We prove Theorem 1 in Section 4.
2. Coamoebae, tropical varieties and initial ideals
As a real algebraic group, the set T := C∗ of invertible complex numbers is isomorphic to
R× U under the map (r, θ) 7→ er+√−1θ. Here, U is the set of complex numbers of norm 1 which
may be identified with R/2πZ. The inverse map is z 7→ (log z, arg(z)).
Let M be a free abelian group of finite rank and N = Hom(M, Z) its dual group. We
use h·,·i for the pairing between M and N. The group ring C[M] is the ring of Laurent
polynomials with exponents in M. It is the coordinate ring of a torus TN which is identified
with N ⊗Z T = Hom(M, T), the set of group homomorphisms M → T. There are natural
maps Log : TN → RN = N ⊗Z R and arg : TN → UN = N ⊗Z U, which are induced by the
maps C∗ ∋ z 7→ log z and z 7→ arg(z) ∈ U. Maps N → N′ of free abelian groups induce
corresponding maps TN → TN ′ of tori, and also of RN and UN . If n is the rank of N, we may
identify N with Zn, which identifies TN with Tn, UN with Un, and RN with Rn.
The amoeba A (X) of a subvariety X ⊂ TN is its image under the map Log : TN → RN ,
and the coamoeba coA (X) of X is the image of X under the argument map arg : TN → UN .
An amoeba has a geometric-combinatorial structure at infinity encoded by the logarithmic
limit set [3, 4]. Coamoebae similarly have phase limit sets which have a related combinatorial
structure that we define and study in Section 4.
If we identify C∗ with R2\{(0, 0)}, then the map arg : C∗ → U given by (a, b) 7→ (a, b)/√a2 + b2
is a real algebraic map. Thus, coamoebae, as they are the image of a real algebraic subset of
the real algebraic variety TN under the real algebraic map arg, are semialgebraic subsets of
UN [1]. It would be very interesting to study them as semi-algebraic sets, in particular, what
are the equations and inequalities satisfied by a coamoeba? When X is a Grassmannian, such
a description would generalize Richter-Gebert's five-point condition for phirotopes from rank
two to arbitrary rank [2].
Similarly, we may replace the map C∗ ∋ z 7→ log z ∈ R in the definition of amoebae by the
map C∗ ∋ z 7→ z ∈ R+ := {r ∈ R r > 0} to obtain the algebraic amoeba of X, which is a
subset of R+
N , and we also ask for its
description as a semi-algebraic set.
N . The algebraic amoeba is a semi-algebraic subset of R+
THE PHASE LIMIT SET OF A VARIETY
3
Example 2. Let ℓ ⊂ T2 be defined by x + y + 1 = 0. The coamoeba coA (ℓ) is the set of
points of U2 of the form (arg(x), π + arg(x + 1)) for x ∈ C \ {0,−1}. If x is real, then these
points are (±π, 0), (±π,±π), and (0,±π) if x lies in the intervals (−∞,−1), (−1, 0), and (0,∞)
respectively. For other values, consider the picture below in the complex plane.
x
x + 1
arg(x) ❳❳❳③
0
✘✘✾
arg(x + 1)
R
For arg(x) 6∈ {0, π} fixed, π + arg(x+1) can take on any value strictly between π + arg(x) (for
w near ∞) and 0 (for x near 0), and thus coA (ℓ) consists of the three points (π, 0), (π, π),
and (0, π) and the interiors of the two triangles displayed below in the fundamental domain
[−π, π]2 ⊂ R2 of U2. This should be understood modulo 2π, so that π = −π.
π
(1)
0
π
The coamoeba is the complement of the region
−π
0
−π
✻
arg(y) = π + arg(x+1)
arg(x)
✲
{(α, β) ∈ [−π, π]2 : α − β ≤ π = arg(−1)} ,
together with the three images of real points (±π, 0), (±π,±π), and (0,±π).
Given a general line ax + by + c = 0 with a, b, c ∈ C∗, we may replace x by cx′/a and y by
cy′/b, to obtain the line x′ + y′ + 1 = 0, with coamoeba (1). This transformation rotates the
coamoeba (1) by arg(a/c) horizontally and arg(b/c) vertically.
Let f ∈ C[M] be a polynomial with support A ⊂ M,
(2)
f = Xm∈A
cm · ξm ,
cm ∈ C∗ ,
where we write ξm for the element of C[M] corresponding to m ∈ M. Given w ∈ RN , let w(f )
be the minimum of hm, wi for m ∈ A. Then the initial form inwf of f with respect to w ∈ RN
is the polynomial inwf ∈ C[M] defined by
inwf := Xhm,wi=w(f )
cm · ξm .
Given an ideal I ⊂ C[M] and w ∈ RN , the initial ideal with respect to w is
Lastly, when I is the ideal of a subvariety X, the initial scheme inwX ⊂ TN is defined by the
initial ideal inwI.
inwI := hinwf f ∈ Ii ⊂ C[M] .
4
MOUNIR NISSE AND FRANK SOTTILE
The sphere SN := (RN \ {0})/R+ is the set of directions in RN . Write π : RN \ {0} → SN
for the projection. The logarithmic limit set L ∞(X) of a subvariety X of TN is the set of
accumulation points in SN of sequences {π(Log(xn))} where {xn} ⊂ X is an unbounded set.
A sequence {xn} ⊂ TN is unbounded if its sequence of logarithms {Log(xn)} is unbounded.
A rational polyhedral cone σ ⊂ RN is the set of points w ∈ RN which satisfy finitely many
inequalities and equations of the form
hm, wi ≥ 0
hm′, wi = 0 ,
where m, m′ ∈ M. The dimension of σ is the dimension of its linear span, and faces of σ are
proper subsets of σ obtained by replacing some inequalities by equations. The relative interior
of σ consists of its points not lying in any face. Also, σ is determined by σ ∩ N, which is a
finitely generated subsemigroup of N.
A rational polyhedral fan Σ is a collection of rational polyhedral cones in RN in which every
and
two cones of Σ meet along a common face.
Theorem 3. The cone in RN over the negative −L ∞(X) of the logarithmic limit set of X is
the set of w ∈ RN such that inwX 6= ∅. Equivalently, it is the set of w ∈ RN such that for every
f ∈ C[M] lying in the ideal I of X, inwf is not a monomial.
This cone over −L ∞(X) admits the structure of a rational polyhedral fan Σ with the property
that if u, w lie in the relative interior of a cone σ of Σ, then inuI = inwI.
minimum, which is forced by our use of toric varieties to prove Theorem 1 in Section 4.2.
It is important to take −L ∞(X). This is correct as we use the tropical convention of
We write inσI for the initial ideal defined by points in the relative interior of a cone σ of
Σ. The fan structure Σ is not canonical, for it depends upon an identification M ∼−→ Zn.
Moreover, it may be the case that σ 6= τ , but inσI = inτ I.
Bergman [3] defined the logarithmic limit set of a subvariety of the torus TN , and Bieri and
Groves [4] showed it was a finite union of convex polyhedral cones. The connection to initial
ideals was made more explicit through work of Kapranov [5] and the above form is adapted from
Speyer and Sturmfels [16]. The logarithmic limit set of X is now called the tropical algebraic
variety of X, and this latter work led to the field of tropical geometry.
3. Lines in space
We consider coamoebae of lines in three-dimensional space. We will work in the torus TP3
of P3, which is the quotient of T4 by the diagonal torus ∆T and similarly in UP3, the quotient
of U4 by the diagonal ∆U := {(θ, θ, θ, θ) θ ∈ U}. By coordinate lines and planes in UP3 we
mean the images in UP3 of lines and planes in U4 parallel to some coordinate plane.
Let ℓ be a line in P3 not lying in any coordinate plane. Then ℓ has a parameterization
(3)
φ : P1 ∋ [s : t]
7−→ [ℓ0(s, t) : ℓ1(s, t) : ℓ2(s, t) : ℓ3(s, t)] ,
where ℓ0, ℓ1, ℓ2, ℓ3 are non-zero linear forms which do not all vanish at the same point. For
i = 0, . . . , 3, let ζi ∈ P1 be the zero of ℓi. The configuration of these zeroes determine the
coamoeba of ℓ ∩ TP3, which we will simply write as coA (ℓ).
THE PHASE LIMIT SET OF A VARIETY
5
Suppose that two zeroes coincide, say ζ3 = ζ2. Then ℓ3 = aℓ2 for some a ∈ C∗, and so ℓ lies
in the translated subtorus z3 = az2 and its coamoeba coA (ℓ) lies in the coordinate subspace
of U3 defined by θ3 = arg(a) + θ2. In fact, coA (ℓ) is pulled back from the coamoeba of the
projection of ℓ to the θ3 = 0 plane. It follows that if there are only two distinct roots among
ζ0, . . . , ζ3, then coA (ℓ) is a coordinate line of U3. If three of the roots are distinct, then (up to
a translation) the projection of the coamoeba coA (ℓ) to the θ3 = 0 plane looks like (1) so that
coA (ℓ) consists of two triangles lying in a coordinate plane.
For each i = 0, . . . , 3 define a function depending upon a point [s : t] ∈ P1 and θ ∈ U by
ϕi(s, t; θ) = (cid:26) θ
arg(ℓi(s, t))
if ℓi(s, t) = 0 ,
otherwise
.
For each i = 0, . . . , 3, let hi be the image in UP3 of U under the map
θ 7−→ [ϕ0(ζi, θ), ϕ1(ζi, θ), ϕ2(ζi, θ), ϕ3(ζi, θ)] .
Lemma 4. For each i = 0, . . . , 3, hi is a coordinate line in UP3 that consists of accumulation
points of coA (ℓ).
This follows from Theorem 1. For the main idea, note that arg ◦φ(ζi + ǫeθ√−1) for θ ∈ U is a
curve in UP3 whose Hausdorff distance to the line hi approaches 0 as ǫ → 0. The phase limit
set of ℓ is the union of these four lines.
Lemma 5. Suppose that the zeroes ζ0, ζ1, ζ2 are distinct. Then
P1 \ {ζ0, ζ1, ζ2} ∋ x 7−→ arg(ℓ0(x), ℓ1(x), ℓ2(x)) ∈ U3/∆U = UP2
is constant along each arc of the circle in P1 through ζ0, ζ1, ζ2.
Proof. After changing coordinates in P1 and translating in UP2 (rotating coordinates), we may
assume that these roots are ∞, 0,−1 and so the circle becomes the real line. Choosing affine
coordinates, we may assume that ℓ0 = 1, ℓ1 = x and ℓ2 = x + 1, so that we are in the situation
of Example 2. Then the statement of the lemma is the computation there for x real in which
we obtained the coordinate points (π, 0), (π, π), and (0, π).
(cid:3)
Lemma 6. The phase limit lines h0, h1, h2, and h3 are disjoint if and only if the roots ζ0, . . . , ζ3
do not all lie on a circle.
Proof. Suppose that two of the limit lines meet, say h0 and h1. Without loss of generality, we
suppose that we have chosen coordinates on U4 and P1 so that ζi ∈ C and ℓi(x) = x − ζi for
i = 0, . . . , 3. Then there are points α, β, θ ∈ U such that
(ϕ0(ζ0, α), ϕ1(ζ0, α), ϕ2(ζ0, α), ϕ3(ζ0, α))
= (ϕ0(ζ1, β), ϕ1(ζ1, β), ϕ2(ζ1, β), ϕ3(ζ1, β)) + (θ, θ, θ, θ) .
Comparing the last two components, we obtain
arg(ζ0 − ζ2) = arg(ζ1 − ζ2) + θ
and
arg(ζ0 − ζ3) = arg(ζ1 − ζ3) + θ ,
6
MOUNIR NISSE AND FRANK SOTTILE
and so the zeroes ζ0, . . . , ζ3 have the configuration below.
ζ3
θ
ζ0
ζ2
θ
ζ1
But then ζ0, . . . , ζ3 are cocircular. Conversely, if ζ0, . . . , ζ3 lie on a circle C, then by Lemma 5
the lines hi and hj meet only if ζi and ζj are the endpoints of an arc of C \ {ζ0, . . . , ζ3}.
(cid:3)
Lemma 7. If the roots ζ0, . . . , ζ3 do not all lie on a circle, then the map
arg ◦φ : P1 \ {ζ0, ζ1, ζ2, ζ3} −→ UP3
is an immersion.
Proof. Let x ∈ P1 \ {ζ0, ζ1, ζ2, ζ3}, which we consider to be a real two-dimensional manifold.
After possibly reordering the roots, the circle C1 containing x, ζ0, ζ1 meets the circle C2 con-
taining x, ζ2, ζ3 transversally at x. Under the derivative of the map arg ◦φ, tangent vectors at x
to C1 and C2 are taken to nonzero vectors (0, 0, u1, v1) and (u2, v2, 0, 0) in the tangent space to
U4. Furthermore, as the four roots do not all lie on a circle, we cannot have both u1 = v1 and
u2 = v2, and so this derivative has full rank two at x, as a map from P1 \{ζ0, ζ1, ζ2, ζ3} → UP3,
which proves the lemma.
(cid:3)
By these lemmas, there is a fundamental difference between the coamoebae of lines when
the roots of the lines ℓi are cocircular and when they are not. We examine each case in detail.
First, choose coordinates so that ζ0 = ∞. After dehomogenizing and separately rescaling each
affine coordinate (e.g. identifying UP3 with U3 and applying phase shifts to each coordinate
θ1, θ2, θ3 of U3), we may assume that the map (3) parametrizing ℓ is
(4)
φ : C ∋ x 7−→ (x − ζ1, x − ζ2, x − ζ3) ∈ C3 .
Suppose first that the four roots are cocircular. As z0 = ∞, the other three lie on a real line
in C, which we may assume is R. That is, if the four roots are cocircular, then up to coordinate
change, we may assume that the line ℓ is real and the affine parametrization (4) is also real. For
this reason, we will call such lines ℓ real lines. We first study the boundary of coA (ℓ). Suppose
that x lies on a contour C in the upper half plane as in Figure 1 that contains semicircles of
C
ζ1
ζ2
ζ3
R
Figure 1. Contour in upper half-plane
radius ǫ centered at each root and a semicircle of radius 1/ǫ centered at 0, but otherwise lies
THE PHASE LIMIT SET OF A VARIETY
7
along the real axis, for ǫ a sufficiently small positive number. Then arg(φ(w)) ∈ U3 is constant
on the four segments of C lying along R with respective values
(5)
(π, π, π) ,
(0, π, π) ,
(0, 0, π) ,
and (0, 0, 0) ,
moving from left to right. On the semicircles around ζ1, ζ2, and ζ3, two of the coordinates are
essentially constant (but not quite equal to either 0 or π!), while the third decreases from π
to 0. Finally, on the large semicircle, the three coordinates are nearly equal and increase from
(0, 0, 0) to (π, π, π). The image arg(φ(C)) can be made as close as we please to the quadrilateral
in U3 connecting the points of (5) in cyclic order, when ǫ is sufficiently small. Thus the image
of the upper half plane under the map arg ◦ φ is a relatively open membrane in U3 that spans
the quadrilateral. It lies within the convex hull of this quadrilateral, which is computed using
the affine structure induced from R3 by the quotient U3 = R3/(2πZ)3.
For this, observe that its projection in any of the four coordinate directions parallel to its
edges is one of the triangles of the coamoeba of the projected line in CP2 of Example 2, and
the convex hull of the quadrilateral is the intersection of the four preimages of these triangles.
Because ℓ is real, the image of the lower half plane is isomorphic to the image of the upper
half plane, under the map (θ1, θ2, θ3) 7→ (−θ1,−θ2,−θ3) and so the coamoeba is symmetric in
the origin of U3 and consists of two quadrilateral patches that meet at their vertices. Here are
two views of the coamoeba of the line where the roots are ∞,−1/2, 0, 3/2:
Now suppose that the roots ζ0, . . . , ζ3 do not all lie on a circle. By Lemma 6, the four
phase limit lines h1, . . . , h3 are disjoint and the map from ℓ to the coamoeba is an immersion.
Figure 2 shows two views of the coamoeba in a fundamental domain of UP3 when the roots are
∞, 1, ζ, ζ 2, where ζ is a primitive third root of infinity. This and other pictures of coamoebae
of lines are animated on the webpage [13].
The projection of this coamoeba along a coordinate direction (parallel to one of the phase
limit lines hi) gives a coamoeba of a line in TP2, as we saw in Example 2. The line hi is
mapped to the interior of one triangle and the vertices of the triangles are the images of line
segments lying on the coamoeba. These three line segments come from the three arcs of the
circle through the three roots other than ζi, the root corresponding to hi.
Proposition 8. The interior of the coamoeba of a general line in TP3 contains 12 line segments
in triples parallel to each of the four coordinate directions.
8
MOUNIR NISSE AND FRANK SOTTILE
Figure 2. Two views of the coamoeba of a symmetric line.
The symmetric coamoeba we show in Figure 2 has six additional line segments, two each
coming from the three longitudinal circles through a third root of unity and 0,∞. Two such
segments are visible as pinch points in the leftmost view in Figure 2. We ask: What is the
maximal number of line segments on a coamoeba of a line in TP3?
4. Structure of the Phase limit set
The phase limit set P∞(X) of a complex subvariety X ⊂ TN is the set of all accumulation
points of sequences {arg(xn) n ∈ N} ⊂ UN , where {xn n ∈ N} ⊂ X is an unbounded
sequence. For w ∈ N, inwX ⊂ TN is the (possibly empty) initial scheme of X, whose ideal is
the initial ideal inwI, where I is the ideal of X. Our main result is that the phase limit set of
X is the union of the coamoebae of all its initial schemes.
Theorem 1. The closure of coA is coA (X) ∪ P∞(X), and
coA (inwX) .
P∞(X) = [w6=0
Remark 9. This is a finite union. By Theorem 3, inwX is non-empty only when w lies in the
cone over the logarithmic set L ∞(X), which can be given the structure of a finite union of
rational polyhedral cones such that any two points in the relative interior of the same cone σ
have the same initial scheme. If we write inσX for the initial scheme corresponding to a cone
hσi ≃ (C∗)dim σ acts on inσX by translation (see, e.g. Corollary 13). (Here,
σ, then the torus T
hσi ⊂ N is the span of σ∩N, a free abelian group of rank dim σ.) This implies that coA (inσX)
is a union of orbits of coA (Thσi) = Uhσi, and thus that dim(coA (inσX)) ≤ 2 dim(X)− dim(σ).
This discussion implies the following proposition.
Proposition 10. Let X ⊂ TN be a subvariety and suppose that TX ⊂ TN is the largest subtorus
acting on X. Then we have dim coA (X) ≤ min{dim TN , 2 dim X − dim TX}.
We prove Theorem 1 in the next two subsections.
THE PHASE LIMIT SET OF A VARIETY
9
4.1. Coamoebae of initial schemes. We review the standard dictionary relating initial ideals
to toric degenerations in the context of subvarieties of TN [7, Ch. 6]. Let X ⊂ TN be a
subvariety with ideal I ⊂ C[M]. We study inwI and the initial schemes inwX = V(inwI) ⊂ TN
for w ∈ N. Since in0I = I, so that in0X = X, we may assume that w 6= 0. As N is the
lattice of one-parameter subgroups of TN , w corresponds to a one-parameter subgroup written
as C∗ ∋ t 7→ tw ∈ TN . Define X ⊂ C × TN by
(6)
The fiber of X over a point t ∈ C∗ is t−wX. Let X be the closure of X in C × TN , and set X0
to be the fiber of X over 0 ∈ C.
Proposition 11. X0 = inwX.
Proof. We first describe the ideal I of X . For m ∈ M, the element ξm ∈ C[M] takes the value
thm,wi ∈ C∗ on the element tw ∈ TN , and so if x ∈ TN , then ξm takes the value thm,wiξm(x) =
thm,wim(x) on twx. Given a polynomial f ∈ C[M] of the form
(cm ∈ C∗)
X := {(t, x) ∈ C∗ × TN tw · x ∈ X} .
f := Xm∈A
define the polynomial f (t) ∈ C[t, t−1][M] by
(7)
cmξm ,
f (t) := Xm∈A
cmthm,wiξm .
Then f (t)(x) = f (twx), so I is generated by the polynomials f (t) (7), for f ∈ I. A general
element of I is a linear combination of translates taf (t) of such polynomials, for a ∈ Z.
If we set w(f ) to be the minimal exponent of t occurring in f (t), then
and
cmξm ,
inwf = Xhm,wi=w(f )
t−w(f )f (t) = inwf + Xhm,wi>w(f )
thm,wi−w(f )cmξm .
This shows that I ∩ C[t][M] is generated by polynomials t−w(f )f (t), where f ∈ I. Since
inwf ∈ C[M] and the remaining terms are divisible by t, we see that the ideal of X0 is generated
by {inwf f ∈ I}, which completes the proof.
(cid:3)
We use Proposition 11 to prove one inclusion of Theorem 1, that
(8)
P∞(X) ⊃ [w∈N\{0}
coA (inwX) .
Fix 0 6= w ∈ N, and let X , X , and X0 = inwX be as in Proposition 11, and let x0 ∈ X0. We
show that arg(x0) ∈ P∞(X). Since (0, x0) ∈ X , there is an irreducible curve C ⊂ X with
(0, x0) ∈ C. The projection of C ⊂ C∗ × TN to C∗ is dominant, so there exists a sequence
10
MOUNIR NISSE AND FRANK SOTTILE
For each n ∈ N, set yn := tw
{(tn, xn) n ∈ N} ⊂ C that converges to (0, x0) with each tn real and positive. Then arg(x0) is
the limit of the sequence {arg(xn)}.
n is
positive and real, and so arg(yn) = arg(xn). Thus arg(x0) is the limit of the sequence {arg(yn)}.
Since xn converges to x0 and tn converges to 0, the sequence {yn} ⊂ X is unbounded, which
implies that arg(x0) lies in the phase limit set of X. This proves (8).
n · xn ∈ X. Since tn is positive and real, every component of tw
4.2. Coamoebae and tropical compactifications. We complete the proof of Theorem 1 by
establishing the other inclusion,
P∞(X) ⊂ [w∈N\{0}
coA (inwX) .
Suppose that {xn n ∈ N} ⊂ X is an unbounded sequence. To study the accumulation points
of the sequence {arg(xn) n ∈ N}, we use a compactification of X that is adapted to its
inclusion in TN . Suitable compactifications are Tevelev's tropical compactifications [17], for in
these the boundary of X is composed of initial schemes inwX of X in a manner we describe
below.
By Theorem 3, the cone over the logarithmic limit set L ∞(X) of X is the support of a
rational polyhedral fan Σ whose cones σ have the property that all initial ideals inwI coincide
for w in the relative interior of σ.
Recall the construction of the toric variety YΣ associated to a fan Σ [6], [7, Ch. 6]. For σ ∈ Σ,
set
σ∨ := {m ∈ M hm, wi ≥ 0 for all w ∈ σ} , and
σ⊥ := {m ∈ M hm, wi = 0 for all w ∈ σ} .
Set Vσ := spec C[σ∨] and Oσ := spec C[σ⊥], which is naturally isomorphic to TN /T
hσi, where
hσi ⊂ N is the subgroup generated by σ∩N. The map m 7→ m⊗m determines a comodule map
C[σ∨] → C[σ∨]⊗ C[M], which induces the action of the torus TN on Vσ. Its orbits correspond to
faces of the cone σ with the smallest orbit Oσ corresponding to σ itself. The inclusion σ⊥ ⊂ σ∨
is split by the semigroup map
(9)
σ∨ ∋ m 7−→ (cid:26) m
0
if m ∈ σ⊥
if m 6∈ σ⊥ ,
which induces a map C[M] ։ C[σ⊥], and thus we have the TN -equivariant split inclusion
Oσ ֒−→ Vσ
πσ−−։ Oσ .
(10)
On orbits Oτ in Vσ, the map πσ is simply the quotient by T
If σ, τ ∈ Σ with σ ⊂ τ , then σ∨ ⊃ τ∨, so C[σ∨] ⊃ C[τ∨], and so Vσ ⊂ Vτ . Since the quotient
fields of C[σ∨] and C[M] coincide, these are inclusions of open sets, and these varieties Vσ for
σ ∈ Σ glue together along these natural inclusions to give the toric variety YΣ. The torus TN
acts on YΣ with an orbit Oσ for each cone σ of Σ.
Since V0 = TN , YΣ contains TN as a dense subset, and thus X is a (non-closed) subvariety.
Let X be the closure of X in YΣ. As the fan Σ is supported on the cone over L ∞(X), X
hσi.
THE PHASE LIMIT SET OF A VARIETY
11
will be a tropical compactification of X and X is complete [17, Prop. 2.3]. To understand the
points of X \ X, we study the intersection X ∩ Vσ, which is defined by I ∩ C[σ∨], as well as the
intersection X ∩ Oσ, which is defined in C[σ⊥] by the image I(σ) of I ∩ C[σ∨] under the map
C[σ∨] ։ C[σ⊥] induced by (10).
Lemma 12. The initial ideal inσI ⊂ C[M] of I is generated by I(σ) under the inclusion
C[σ⊥] ֒→ C[M].
Proof. Let f ∈ I. Since σ is a cone in Σ, we have that inσf = inwf for all w in the relative
interior of σ. Thus for w ∈ σ, the function m 7→ hm, wi on exponents of monomials of f is
minimized on (a superset of) the support of inσf , and if w lies in the relative interior of σ, then
the minimizing set is the support of inσf . Multiplying f if necessary by ξ−m, where m is some
monomial of inσf , we may assume that for every w ∈ σ, the linear function m 7→ hm, wi is
nonnegative on the support of f , so that f ∈ C[σ∨], and the function is zero on the support of
inσf . Furthermore, if w lies in the relative interior of σ, then it vanishes exactly on the support
of inσf . Thus inσf ∈ C[σ⊥], which completes the proof.
(cid:3)
Since Oσ = TN /Thσi, Lemma 12 has the following geometric counterpart.
Corollary 13. Thσi acts (freely) on inσX by translation with inσX/Thσi = X ∩ Oσ.
Proof of Theorem 1. Let θ ∈ P∞(X) be a point in the phase limit set of X. Then there exists
an unbounded sequence {xn n ∈ N} ⊂ X with
arg(xn) = θ .
lim
n→∞
Since X is compact, the sequence {xn n ∈ N} has an accumulation point x in X. As the
sequence is unbounded, x 6∈ O0, and so x ∈ X \ X. Thus x is a point of X ∩ Oσ for some cone
σ 6= 0 of Σ. Replacing {xn} by a subsequence, we may assume that limn xn = x.
Because the map πσ (10) is continuous and is the identity on Oσ, we have that {πσ(xn)}
converges to πσ(x) = x, and thus
(11)
πσ(θ) = πσ(cid:0) lim
n→∞
arg(xn)(cid:1) = arg(cid:0) lim
n→∞
πσ(xn)(cid:1) = arg(x) ∈ coA (X ∩ Oσ) .
Corollary 13 implies that coA (X ∩ Oσ) = coA (inσX)/Uσ, as Uhσi = arg(Thσi). Recall that
on O0, πσ is the quotient by T
hσi. Thus we conclude from (11) that θ ∈ coA (inσX) which
completes the proof of Theorem 1 as inσX = inwX for any w in the relative interior of σ. (cid:3)
Example 14. In [12], the closure of a hypersurface coamoeba coA (V(f )) for f ∈ C[M] was
shown to contain a finite collection of codual hyperplanes. These are translates of codimension
one subtori Uσ for σ a cone in the normal fan of the Newton polytope of f corresponding
to an edge. By Theorem 1, these translated tori are that part of the phase limit set of X
corresponding to the cones σ dual to the edges, specifically coA (inσX). Since σ has dimension
n−1, the torus Tσ acts with finitely many orbits on inσX, which is therefore a union of finitely
many translates of Tσ. Thus coA (inσX) is a union of finitely many translates of Uσ.
The logarithmic limit set L ∞(C) of a curve C ⊂ TN is a finite collection of points in SN .
Each point gives a ray in the cone over L ∞(C), and the components of P∞(C) corresponding
12
MOUNIR NISSE AND FRANK SOTTILE
to a ray σ are finitely many translations of the dimension one subtorus Uσ of UN , which we
referred to as lines in Section 3. These were the lines lying in the boundaries of the coamoebae
coA (ℓ) of the lines ℓ in T2 and T3.
References
[1] Saugata Basu, Richard Pollack, and Marie-Fran¸coise Roy, Algorithms in real algebraic geometry, second
ed., Algorithms and Computation in Mathematics, vol. 10, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006.
[2] Alexander Below, Vanessa Krummeck, and Jurgen Richter-Gebert, Complex matroids phirotopes and their
realizations in rank 2, Discrete and computational geometry, Algorithms Combin., vol. 25, Springer, Berlin,
2003, pp. 203 -- 233.
[3] George M. Bergman, The logarithmic limit-set of an algebraic variety, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 157 (1971),
459 -- 469.
[4] Robert Bieri and J. R. J. Groves, The geometry of the set of characters induced by valuations, J. Reine
Angew. Math. 347 (1984), 168 -- 195.
[5] Manfred Einsiedler, Mikhail Kapranov, and Douglas Lind, Non-Archimedean amoebas and tropical varieties,
J. Reine Angew. Math. 601 (2006), 139 -- 157.
[6] William Fulton, Introduction to toric varieties, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 131, Princeton Uni-
versity Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993.
[7] I. M. Gel′fand, M. M. Kapranov, and A. V. Zelevinsky, Discriminants, resultants, and multidimensional
determinants, Mathematics: Theory & Applications, Birkhauser Boston Inc., Boston, MA, 1994.
[8] Petter Johansson, The argument cycle and the coamoeba, Complex Variables and Elliptic Equations (2011),
DOI:10.1080/17476933.2011.592581.
[9] Richard Kenyon, Andrei Okounkov, and Scott Sheffield, Dimers and amoebae, Ann. of Math. (2) 163
(2006), no. 3, 1019 -- 1056.
[10] G. Mikhalkin, Real algebraic curves, the moment map and amoebas, Ann. of Math. (2) 151 (2000), no. 1,
309 -- 326.
[11] Lisa Nilsson and Mikael Passare, Discriminant coamoebas in dimension two, J. Commut. Algebra 2 (2010),
no. 4, 447 -- 471.
[12] Mounir Nisse, Geometric and combinatorial structure of hypersurface coamoebas, arXiv:0906.2729.
[13] Mounir Nisse and Frank Sottile, Coamoebae of lines in 3-space,
www.math.tamu.edu/~sottile/research/stories/coAmoeba/.
[14] Mikael Passare and Hans Rullgard, Amoebas, Monge-Amp`ere measures, and triangulations of the Newton
polytope, Duke Math. J. 121 (2004), no. 3, 481 -- 507.
[15] Kevin Purbhoo, A Nullstellensatz for amoebas, Duke Math. J. 141 (2008), no. 3, 407 -- 445.
[16] David Speyer and Bernd Sturmfels, The tropical Grassmannian, Adv. Geom. 4 (2004), no. 3, 389 -- 411.
[17] Jenia Tevelev, Compactifications of subvarieties of tori, Amer. J. Math. 129 (2007), no. 4, 1087 -- 1104.
[18] Thorsten Theobald, Computing amoebas, Experiment. Math. 11 (2002), no. 4, 513 -- 526 (2003).
Mounir Nisse, Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
77843, USA
E-mail address: [email protected]
URL: www.math.tamu.edu/~nisse
Frank Sottile, Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
77843, USA
E-mail address: [email protected]
URL: www.math.tamu.edu/~sottile
|
1009.1768 | 1 | 1009 | 2010-09-09T13:13:10 | Invertible Symmetric 3 x 3 Binary Matrices and GQ(2,4) | [
"math.AG",
"math-ph",
"math-ph"
] | We reveal an intriguing connection between the set of 27 (disregarding the identity) invertible symmetric 3 x 3 matrices over GF(2) and the points of the generalized quadrangle GQ(2,4). The 15 matrices with eigenvalue one correspond to a copy of the subquadrangle GQ(2,2), whereas the 12 matrices without eigenvalues have their geometric counterpart in the associated double-six. The fine details of this correspondence, including the precise algebraic meaning/analogue of collinearity, are furnished by employing the representation of GQ(2,4) as a quadric in PG(5,2) of projective index one. An interesting physical application of our findings is also mentioned. | math.AG | math |
Invertible Symmetric 3 × 3 Binary Matrices
and GQ(2, 4)
Andrea Blunck,1 P´eter L´evay,2 Metod Saniga3 and P´eter Vrana2
1Department of Mathematics, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
2Department of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Physics, Budapest University of
Technology and Economics, H-1521 Budapest, Hungary
3Astronomical Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences
SK-05960 Tatransk´a Lomnica, Slovak Republic
and
(November 2, 2018)
Abstract: We reveal an intriguing connection between the set of 27 (disregarding the
identity) invertible symmetric 3 × 3 matrices over GF(2) and the points of the generalized
quadrangle GQ(2, 4). The 15 matrices with eigenvalue one correspond to a copy of the
subquadrangle GQ(2, 2), whereas the 12 matrices without eigenvalues have their geometric
counterpart in the associated double-six. The fine details of this correspondence, includ-
ing the precise algebraic meaning/analogue of collinearity, are furnished by employing the
representation of GQ(2, 4) as a quadric in PG(5, 2) of projective index one. An interesting
physical application of our findings is also mentioned.
Keywords: Binary Matrices of Order 3 -- GQ(2, 4) -- PG(5, 2): Quadratic Forms and
Symplectic Polarity
1
Introduction
The set of invertible symmetric 3 × 3 matrices over the field GF(2) has 28 elements. The
elements different from the identity matrix can be divided in a natural way into one set of
15 matrices and two sets of 6 matrices each. This suggests that there might be a connection
to the generalized quadrangle GQ(2, 4), which has a description using a subquadrangle of
15 points and two additional sets of 6 points each.
In this paper we show that indeed the set of 27 invertible, non-identity matrices can be
equipped with the structure of GQ(2, 4).
In Section 2, we recall some well known facts
on generalized quadrangles, in particular, the two descriptions of GQ(2, 4) we are going to
work with. In Section 3 we study the set of invertible symmetric 3 × 3 matrices over GF(2).
In Section 4 we show that the 27 matrices can be mapped bijectively onto a quadric of
projective index one in PG(5, 2), which can be seen as the point set of GQ(2, 4). In Section
5, we give another description, where the points appear as planes in PG(5, 2); in this section
we also state an explicit isomorphism between the generalized quadrangle on the 27 matrices
and the model of GQ(2, 4) mentioned above (Proposition 5.6). Finally, in Section 6 we state
an application to physics.
The geometry of matrices defined over fields/division rings represents an important branch of
geometry (see, e. g., the monograph of Wan [12]). The elements of a matrix space are viewed
as vertices of a graph where a particular symmetric and anti-reflexive adjacency relation is
defined. The problem of describing all adjacency-preserving bijections between matrix spaces
is then converted into that of finding all isomorphisms between the corresponding graphs.
A prominent place in the field is occupied by symmetric matrices (e. g., [13, 14]), and in
particular those defined over fields of characteristic two (e. g., [4, 15]). This paper deals,
like [15], with a particular case of 3 × 3 symmetric binary matrices. Yet our approach is
fundamentally different from that followed by Wan and/or others since we focus exclusively
on invertible matrices and instead of the concept of adjacency in a graph we use that of
collinearity in a particular well-known finite geometry (here the generalized quadrangle of
type GQ(2, 4)).
1
2 The generalized quadrangle GQ(2, 4)
A finite generalized quadrangle is a point-line incidence geometry (P, L) satisfying the fol-
lowing axioms (see [7, 1.1]), where s, t ≥ 1 are fixed natural numbers:
• Each point is incident with 1 + t lines and any two points are joined by at most one
line.
• Each line is incident with 1 + s points and any two lines meet in at most one point.
• For each pair (p, L) ∈ P × L with p /∈ L there is a unique pair (q, M ) ∈ P × L such
that p ∈ M , q ∈ M , q ∈ L.
The pair (s, t) is called the order of (P, L). Examples of generalized quadrangles (GQs) can
be obtained from quadratic forms (see [7, 3.1.1]): Let F be a finite field of order s and let
q be a quadractic form of index 2 on V = F d+1. This means that the associated quadric
Q = {F v v ∈ V, v 6= 0, q(v) = 0} in the d-dimensional projective space PG(d, s) over F
contains lines but no planes (Q has projective index 1). Recall that such a quadratic form q
exists exactly if d = 3, 4 or 5. Now consider the incidence structure (Q, L), where L is the set
of lines of PG(d, s) contained in Q. Then (Q, L) is a generalized quadrangle of order (s, t),
where t = 1 if d = 3, t = s if d = 4, and t = s2 if d = 5. This GQ is called an orthogonal
quadrangle. Since there is up to equivalence only one quadratic form of index 2 on each of
the vector spaces under consideration, a finite orthogonal quadrangle is uniquely determined
by the parameters d and s and thus is called Q(d, s) for short. Note that one can also define
infinite generalized quadrangles and then one similarly gets orthogonal quadrangles over
infinite fields (see [10]).
We are going to study the orthogonal quadrangle Q(5, 2) whose point set Q is a quadric in
PG(5, 2). One can show ([7, 5.3.2]) that there is (up to isomorphism) only one generalized
quadrangle of order (2, 4), namely, Q(5, 2). For this reason the generalized quadrangle
Q(5, 2) is also called GQ(2, 4). It has (s + 1)(s3 + 1) = 27 points and (s2 + 1)(s3 + 1) = 45
lines. Non-degenerate hyperplane sections of Q give rise to subgeometries of Q(5, 2) that
are ismorphic to Q(4, 2) ∼= GQ(2, 2), the unique GQ of order (2, 2). There are 36 distinct
copies of GQ(2, 2) in GQ(2, 4) [9].
We present another model of GQ(2, 4) ([7, 6.1]; see Figure 1): We start with a subgeometry
Its point set P ′ consists of the 2-
isomorphic to GQ(2, 2) (sometimes called the doily).
element subsets of {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} (so there are 15 points), and the line set L′ consists of
the 3-element subsets {A, B, C} of P ′ with A ∪ B ∪ C = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} (so there are also
15 lines). Now we add 12 extra points called 1, 2, . . . , 6, 1′, 2′, . . . , 6′ and the 30 extra lines
{i, {i, j}, j ′} (with 1 ≤ i, j ≤ 6, i 6= j). The thus obtained incidence geometry (P, L) is
isomorphic to GQ(2, 4) and depicted in Figure 1. We sometimes call the additional points
1, 2, . . . , 6, 1′, 2′, . . . , 6′ the double-six. Its connection to the classical double-six of lines in
3-space is established, e. g., in [3].
3 The 27 matrices
The set J = S(3, 2) of symmetric 3 × 3 matrices with entries in GF(2) is a 6-dimensional
vector subspace of the algebra M(3, 2) of all 3 × 3 matrices with entries in GF(2).
It is
not closed w.r.t. multiplication, so it is not a subalgebra. However, it is closed w.r.t. the
operations A 7→ A−1 (if A ∈ J ∗, the set of invertible elements of J) and (A, B) 7→ ABA.
Since, moreover, the identity matrix 1 belongs to J, we have that J is a Jordan-closed Jordan
system (see [2]).
Among the 64 elements of J = S(3, 2), there are 28 invertible ones. These fall into three
classes:
• the identity matrix 1.
• 15 matrices 6= 1 with eigenvalue 1. These are the matrices Di (see below). The matrices
i = 1) and have a 2-dimensional eigenspace, the
D1, D2 and D3 are involutions (i.e. D2
others have a 1-dimensional eigenspace. We call the set of these matrices D.
2
1
45
3'
2'
36
26
5
12
15
14
4
13
6
6'
25
46
4'
34
56
5'
35
2
23
16
1'
6'
24
3
5
56
5'
6
Figure 1: A diagrammatic illustration of the structure of the generalized quadrangle GQ(2, 4)
built around the doily (after Polster [8], slightly modified). In both the parts, each picture
depicts the doily and all 27 points (circles) of GQ(2, 4). The top picture shows only 19 lines
(line segments and arcs of circles) of GQ(2, 4), with the two points located in the middle
of the doily being regarded as lying one above and the other below the plane the doily is
drawn in. Sixteen out of the missing 26 lines can be obtained by successive rotations of the
figure through 72 degrees around the center of the pentagon. The bottom picture shows a
couple of lines which go off the doily's plane; the remaining 8 lines of this kind are again
gotten by rotating the figure through 72 degrees around the center of the pentagon.
• 12 = 6 + 6 matrices without eigenvalues. These fall into two classes U and V of six
matrices each (the matrices Ui and Vi, respectively). Both subsets U ∪ {1, 0} and
V ∪ {1, 0} of S(3, 2), where 0 is the zero matrix, are fields isomorphic to GF(8).
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
D1 =
D4 =
D7 =
D10 =
0 1
1 0
0 0
0 1
1 0
0 1
1 0
1 0
0 1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
, D2 =
, D5 =
, D8 =
, D11 =
1 0
0 1
1 0
1
0
0
0 0
0 1
1 0
1 1
0 1
1 1
0 0
0 1
1 1
0 1
1 0
0 0
0 1
1 1
1 1
1 0
0 1
0 1
, D3 =
, D6 =
, D9 =
, D12 =
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
,
,
,
,
1 0
0 0
0 1
1
1
1
1 0
0 1
1 1
3
1 1
1 1
0 1
0
1
1
D13 =
U1 =
U4 =
V1 =
V4 =
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
, D14 =
, U2 =
, U5 =
V2 =
,
V5 =
,
0
1
1
1
0
1
1 1
1 0
0 0
0 1
1 1
1 0
1 0
0 1
1 1
1 1
0 0
0 1
1 1
1 0
1 1
0 1
1 0
1 0
1 1
1 0
0 1
1
1
0
, D15 =
, U3 =
, U6 =
V3 =
,
V6 =
,
1
1
0
0
0
1
0 1
0 1
1 1
1 0
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
1 0
1
1
1
1 1
1 0
0 1
1
0
1
0
1
0
,
,
.
,
.
1 0
1 1
1 0
0 1
1 1
1 1
We are interested in the set S := J ∗ \{1} = D∪U∪V. Our aim is to introduce the structure
of GQ(2, 4) on S such that D corresponds to a copy of the doily and U, V correspond to
the associated double-six.
We mention the following geometric facts: All matrices of S ⊆ GL(3, 2) act on the projec-
tive plane PG(2, 2) (the Fano plane) as collineations. The fixed points of such a collineation
are exactly the 1-dimensional eigenspaces of the associated matrix. This implies that the
collineations induced by D1, D2, D3 fix one line pointwise (and hence are axial collineations),
the collineations induced by the other elements of D fix exactly one point, and the collineations
induced by U ∪ V are fixed point free. The sets G = U ∪ {1} and H = V ∪ {1} are groups
isomorphic to the multiplicative group of GF(8) (and hence isomorphic to the cyclic group
of order 7). They induce on PG(2, 2) so-called Singer cycles (compare [5, II.10]).
4 Two quadratic forms
The vector space J = S(3, 2) over F = GF(2) is 6-dimensional. We identify J \ {0} with
the projective space PG(5, 2) by identifying the 1-dimensional subspace F X = {0, X} with
X ∈ J \ {0}. In order to show that the 27-element set S = J ∗ \ {1} from above can be
viewed as the point set of GQ(2, 4) we are going to construct a suitable quadratic form on J.
We know that a matrix X ∈ J belongs to J ∗ if, and only if, det X = 1. The mapping
det : J −→ F is a cubic form. Our first step now is to introduce new coordinates on J such
that det can be seen as a quadratic form. For this purpose, we map the matrix
X =
a b
d
b
c
e
c
e
f
∈ J
to the vector
α(X) = (a, e2 + df, d, c2 + af, f, b2 + ad) = (a, e + df, d, c + af, f, b + ad) ∈ V = F 6. (1)
Note that here we used that x2 = x is valid for all x ∈ F . One can easily check that α is a
bijection (but of course not a linear one). On V we have the quadratic form q0 of index 3
given by
q0(x) = q(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6) = x1x2 + x3x4 + x5x6.
A direct computation, using that F has characteristic 2, yields that for each matrix X ∈ J
we have
det X = q0(α(X)).
(2)
4
Let h..i0 be the symmetric bilinear form associated to q0, i. e., for x, y ∈ V we have
hxyi0 = q0(x + y) + q0(x) + q0(y).
Then for all X, Y ∈ J the following holds:
hα(X)α(Y )i0 = det(X + Y ) + det X + det Y.
(3)
Note that this is not completely trivial because α is not linear. Equations (2) and (3) allow
us to identify X with α(X) (and so J with V = F 6) and q0 with det. In particular, the
identity matrix 1 corresponds to the vector (1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1). The quadric Q0 given by q0
is the Klein quadric in PG(5, 2), which is in 1 − 1 correspondence with the set of lines of
PG(3, 2), and hence consists of 35 elements. This is clear also because there are 35 non-zero
non-invertible matrices in J = S(3, 2).
Our set S, together with the identity matrix 1, is the (set-theoretic) complement of Q0 in
PG(5, 2). In order to find a bijection from S to a quadric of projective index 1 in PG(5, 2)
we consider another quadratic form q on V = J, given by
q(X) = q0(X) + (hX1i0)2 = q0(X) + hX1i0.
One can easily check that the associated bilinear form h..i coincides with h..i0. Moreover,
using (2), (3) and identifying X with α(X), we get
q(X) = det X + det(X + 1) + det X + det 1 = det(X + 1) + 1.
(4)
From this equation it is obvious that the quadric Q given by q consists exactly of the points
X of PG(5, 2) with X + 1 ∈ S (recall that X = 0 is not a point of PG(5, 2)). So it is
reasonable to consider the mapping
π : X 7→ X + 1,
which can be seen as a translation on the affine space V = J. However, we want to interpret
π projectively. In PG(5, 2), the mapping π is not defined on the point 1, because π(1) = 0;
on the other points π is a bijection. For each point X 6= 1 the image π(X) is the unique
third point on the line joining X and 1.
As mentioned above, we have that π(S) = Q. So the quadric Q consists of 27 points. Thus
Q must be a quadric of projective index 1 and hence gives rise to a generalized quadrangle
GQ(Q) ∼= GQ(2, 4) as described in Section 2. This leads us to the following definition:
Definition 4.1. The incidence structure GQ(S) is given by the point set S and the line set
L(S) consisting of the 3-element subsets π−1(L), where L ⊆ Q is a line entirely contained
in Q (i.e., a line of the generalized quadrangle GQ(Q) on Q). Then clearly GQ(S) is a
generalized quadrangle isomorphic to GQ(Q) via π, i.e., GQ(S) is a model of GQ(2, 4). For
X, Y ∈ S we write X ∼ Y iff X, Y are collinear in GQ(S), i.e., iff π(X), π(Y ) are collinear
in GQ(Q).
We mention here that similarly to the quadratic form q, which is defined with the help of
the distinguished matrix 1, one could define a quadratic form qM for each matrix M ∈ S by
qM (X) = q0(X) + hXM i0 = det(X + M ) + 1. Thus we get 27 more quadrics of projective
index 1, all of which can be mapped bijectively onto S by a mapping πM : X 7→ X + M .
However, we will restrict ourselves to q and π as above.
The following holds:
Proposition 4.2. Let X, Y ∈ S. Then X ∼ Y ⇐⇒ hX + 1Y + 1i = 0. In particular:
(a) If X, Y ∈ U ∪ V, then X ∼ Y ⇐⇒ det(X + Y ) = 0.
(b) If X, Y ∈ D, then X ∼ Y ⇐⇒ det(X + Y ) = 0.
(c) If X ∈ U ∪ V, Y ∈ D, then X ∼ Y ⇐⇒ det(X + Y ) = 1.
5
Proof. By definition, X ∼ Y iff π(X) = X + 1 and π(Y ) = Y + 1 are collinear in GQ(Q).
This is equivalent to 0 = hX + 1, Y + 1i = hX + 1, Y + 1i0. Using (3), we compute
0 = hX + 1, Y + 1i0 = det(X + 1 + Y + 1) + det(X + 1) + det(Y + 1) = det(X + Y ) +
det(X + 1) + det(Y + 1). This implies the statements of (a), (b), (c) because in cases (a) and
(b) we have det(X + 1) = det(Y + 1) while in case (c) we have det(X + 1) 6= det(Y + 1).
Proposition 4.3.
(a) For the subsets D, V and U of S, the following holds:
(i) π(U) = U, π(V) = V, π(D) ∩ S = ∅,
(ii) S ∩ Q = U ∪ V, Q0 ∩ Q = π(D),
(b) Let 1⊥(= 1⊥0) be the hyperplane of points of PG(5, 2) perpendicular to 1 w.r.t. h..i(=
h..i0), i.e., the tangent hyperplane through 1 of Q and of Q0. Then:
(i) 1⊥ = {1} ∪ D ∪ π(D),
(ii) The tangents through 1 of Q and of Q0 are the lines {1, X, π(X)} with X ∈ D.
(iii) The quadric Q ∩ 1⊥ = Q0 ∩ 1⊥ equals π(D). So π(D) is a quadric of projective
index 1 in the 4-dimensional projective space 1⊥ and gives rise to a subquadrangle
GQ(D) isomorphic to GQ(2, 2).
Proof. (a) (i): The statements on U and V can be checked easily. (They follow also from
the fact that U ∪ {1, 0} and V ∪ {1, 0} are fields of characteristic 2.) The statement on D
is clear because the elements of D have eigenvalue 1.
(ii): The first equation follows from (i) because Q = π(S). The second equation follows
from the fact that D consists exactly of the elements of S that have eigenvalue 1.
(b) (i) X ∈ 1⊥ ⇐⇒ 0 = hX, 1i = hX, 1i0 = det(X+1)+det X+1 ⇐⇒ det(X+1) 6= det X.
So 1 ∈ 1⊥, and for X 6= 1 we get X ∈ 1⊥ ⇐⇒ X ∈ D or X + 1 ∈ D.
(ii) and (iii) follow from (i) and (a).
5 Another projective representation
Again we consider the projective space PG(5, 2). But now we study the planes of this space,
i. e., the 3-dimensional vector subspaces of V = F 6. Each such plane can be described as
the row space of a 3 × 6 matrix, i. e., a matrix (AB), with A, B ∈ M(3, 2), of rank 3. In
what follows, we always identify (AB) with its row space.
Let
S := {(X1) X ∈ S}.
Then of course each 3 × 6 matrix in S has rank 3 and thus will be considered as a plane of
PG(5, 2). The bijection S −→ S : X 7→ (X1) gives us another model of GQ(2, 4), where
the points are planes in PG(5, 2). We call this model GQ(S). Note that for X ∈ S the
coordinate vector α(X) defined in (1) consists exactly of the six Plucker coordinates (i.e.
the 3 × 3-minors) of (X1) that have multiplicity one.
We study the planes of S more in detail. It is shown in [12] (see also [1], [2]) that all these
planes are totally isotropic w.r.t. a symplectic polarity of PG(5, 2). Moreover, they are all
skew to the plane (10) and to the plane (01), as two planes (AB) and (CD) are skew iff
the 6×6 matrix (cid:18)A B
C D(cid:19) is invertible. For two planes (X1) and (Y 1) (with X, Y ∈ M(3, 2)
arbitrary) we have
rank(X − Y ) = k ⇐⇒ dim((X1) ∩ (Y 1)) = 3 − k
(5)
(see [12, Prop. (3.30)]; here dim means the vector space dimension). Note that in (5) we
might also write X + Y instead of X − Y since the ground field is F = GF(2). Now we
study the following subsets of S:
D := {(X1) X ∈ D}, U := {(X1) X ∈ U}, V := {(X1) X ∈ V}.
6
Remark 5.1. The sets U ′ := {(10), (01), (11)} ∪ U and V ′ := {(10), (01), (11)} ∪ V are
spreads, i. e. partitions of the point set of PG(5, 2) into planes.
Proof. By (5), any two different planes of U ′ (or V ′, respectively) are skew. Since PG(5, 2)
altogether has 63 points and each plane has 7 points, the assertion follows.
It is easy to see that the intersection of the planes (X1) and (11) consists exactly of the
points F (x1, x2, x3, x1, x2, x3) where x = (x1, x2, x3) is an eigenvector of X. (Note that we
let the matrices act from the right, so the eigenvectors are rows and not columns.) This
implies:
Remark 5.2. For each Di ∈ D the plane (Di1) ∈ D meets the distinguished plane (11)
either in a point or in a line (and this latter case appears exactly if i = 1, 2, 3).
By Rem. 5.1 the plane (X1) ∈ U ∪ V is always skew to (11). Next we want to find out
how the planes (U 1) ∈ U intersect the planes (X1) ∈ D ∪ V. For this we need a lemma on
an action of the cyclic group G = {1} ∪ U:
Lemma 5.3. The mapping ρ : U 7→ ρU : X 7→ U XU (U ∈ G) is an action of G on the
21-element set D ∪ V. There are three orbits of this action, each orbit contains 2 elements
of V and 5 elements of D, among these exactly one of the involutions D1, D2, D3. (So
D1, D2, D3 can be chosen as representatives of the orbits.) The same holds for the action of
H = {1} ∪ V on D ∪ U.
Proof. For U ∈ G and X ∈ D ∪ V, the matrix U XU is again symmetric and of course again
invertible, so U XU ∈ S ∪ {1}. In addition, since G is a group and X does not belong to G,
we are sure that U XU belongs to D ∪ V. As G is commutative, we have ρU U ′ = ρU ρU ′ , so ρ
is a group action. The statement on the orbits can be checked by a direct computation.
Now we extend the action of G on D ∪ V to the plane set D ∪ V. Consider again U ∈ G.
Then the 6 × 6 matrix (cid:18)U
0 U −1(cid:19) induces a collineation of PG(5, 2). This collineation maps
0
planes to planes; in particular, for each matrix X we have
(X1) 7→ (X1)(cid:18)U
0 U −1(cid:19) = (XU U −1) = (U XU 1).
0
if, and only if, (U XU 1) meets
Moreover, we have that (X1) meets (11) in a line,
(U 1U 1) = (U 21) in a line.
Consider now an arbitrary X ∈ D ∪ V. Then the orbit of X under the action of G contains
exactly one of the matrices D1, D2, D3, say D1, i. e., X = U D1U for some U ∈ G. By
Rem. 5.2, (D11) meets (11) in a line. So (X1) = (U D1U 1) meets (U 21) in a line. Recall
now that the set U ′ defined in Rem. 5.1 is a spread of PG(5, 2), so each of the 4 remaining
points of the plane (X1) (not in (U 21)) must be contained in exactly one of the planes
(Y 1) with Y ∈ G \ {U 2} (recall that (X1) is skew to (10) and (01)). Since no 3 of the 4
points are collinear, we have that 4 of these planes are needed, i. e., 4 of these planes meet
(X1) in exactly one point. By Rem. 5.2, the plane (11) is among these 4 planes if, and
only if, X = D1. Altogether, we have the following result:
Proposition 5.4. Let X ∈ D ∪ V. Then the plane (X1) ∈ D ∪ V meets
(a) exactly 4 planes of U in a point and no plane of U in a line, if X ∈ {D1, D2, D3},
(b) exactly 3 planes of U in a point and exactly one plane of U in a line, if X ∈ D \
{D1, D2, D3},
(c) exactly 4 planes of U in a point and exactly one plane of U in a line, if X ∈ V.
Consequently, (X1) is skew to exactly two planes of U, if X ∈ D, and (X1) is skew to
exactly one plane of U, if X ∈ V. The same holds if the roles of U and V are interchanged.
7
i = Vi.
By the above, for each X ∈ U there is a unique in Y ∈ V such that (X1) is skew to (Y 1)
(and vice versa). We write Y = X ′ (and X = Y ′). A direct computation using (5) yields
that U ′
Now we study collinearity in GQ(S). We write (X1) ∼ (Y 1) iff the planes (X1), (Y 1) ∈ S
are collinear. By definition of GQ(S) this is equivalent to X ∼ Y . Using Propositions 4.2
and 5.4, we obtain the following:
Proposition 5.5. Let (X1), (Y 1) ∈ S. Then the following holds:
(a) If X, Y ∈ U ∪ V, then (X1) ∼ (Y 1) iff the two planes meet. This is the case exactly
if X = Y or X ∈ U, Y ∈ V \ {X ′} or X ∈ V, Y ∈ U \ {X ′}.
(b) If X ∈ U∪V, Y ∈ D, then (X1) ∼ (Y 1) iff the two planes are skew. For each Y ∈ D
there are exactly two matrices X1, X2 ∈ U and two matrices X3, X4 ∈ V satisfying
this condition; moreover, w.l.o.g., X3 = X ′
1 and X4 = X ′
2.
(c) If X, Y ∈ D, then (X1) ∼ (Y 1) iff the two planes meet. For each X ∈ D there are
exactly 6 matrices Y ∈ D, Y 6= X, satisfying this condition.
Proof. (a): By 4.2 (a) we have that (X1) ∼ (Y 1) iff 0 = det(X + Y ), which by (5) is
equivalent to the statement that the planes meet. The second statement follows from 5.4.
(b): By 4.2 (c) we have that (X1) ∼ (Y 1) iff 1 = det(X + Y ), which by (5) is equivalent
to the statement that the planes are skew. The second statement follows from 5.4. The
statement that X3 = X ′
2 can be checked by an explicit computation. (See
also Prop. 5.6.)
(c): The first statement can be shown as in (a). The second statement follows from (a)
and (b) and the fact that each point p of GQ(2, 4) is collinear to exactly 10 points different
from p.
1 and X4 = X ′
The statements from above suggest how to find an explicit isomorphism from GQ(2, 4)
onto GQ(S) (or GQ(S)) such that D corresponds to the doily and U, V correspond to the
double-six.
Proposition 5.6. The following is an isomorphism from GQ(S) to GQ(2, 4):
∀i ∈ {1, 2, . . . , 6} : Ui 7→ i, Vi 7→ i′,
D1 7→ {3, 5}, D2 7→ {1, 4}, D3 7→ {2, 6}, D4 7→ {1, 2}, D5 7→ {4, 5},
D6 7→ {1, 6}, D7 7→ {3, 4}, D8 7→ {3, 6}, D9 7→ {2, 5}, D10 7→ {4, 6},
D11 7→ {1, 3}, D12 7→ {1, 5}, D13 7→ {2, 4}, D14 7→ {2, 3}, D15 7→ {5, 6}
Proof. Explicit computation using 4.2.
We mention still another model: The mapping π : X 7→ X + 1 from above can be trans-
ferred to the planes (X1) via (X1) 7→ (X + 11). This is induced by a collineation of
PG(5, 2), namely, the one given by the 6 × 6 matrix (cid:18)1 1
0 1(cid:19). We call the image of S
under this collineation π(S). Then it is clear that π(S) is the image of π(S) = Q un-
der the representation X 7→ (X1), and π(S) can be seen as the point set of another
model of GQ(2, 4). As in GQ(Q), we then have that (X1), (Y 1) ∈ π(S) are collinear
iff 0 = hXY i = hXY i0 = det(X + Y ) + det X + det Y . The point set π(S) consists exactly
of those planes (X1), X ∈ J = S(3, 2), that are skew to (11) (because by (4) we have
0 = q(X) = det(X + 1) + 1) and different from (01).
8
6 An interesting physical application
The ideas discussed above can also be relevant from a physical point of view. This is because
the geometry of the generalized quadrangle GQ(2, 4) reproduces completely the properties
of the E6(6)-symmetric entropy formula describing black holes and black strings in D = 5
supergravity [6]. As a detailed discussion of this issue lies far beyond the scope of the
present paper we just outline the gist, referring the interested reader to [6] for more details
and further literature. The 27 black hole/string charges correspond to the points and the
45 terms in the entropy formula to the lines of GQ(2, 4). Different truncations with 15, 11
and 9 charges are represented by three distinguished subconfigurations of GQ(2, 4), namely
by a copy of GQ(2, 2), the set of points collinear to a given point, and a copy of GQ(2, 1),
respectively. In order to obtain also the correct signs for the terms in the entropy formula,
it was necessary to employ a non-commutative labelling for the points of GQ(2, 4). This
was furnished by certain elements of the real three-qubit Pauli group [6]; now it is obvious
that the set of invertible matrices from J = S(3, 2) lends itself as another candidate to do
such job. A link between the two labellings can, for example, be established by employing
the plane representation of S = J ∗ \ {1}, transforming each matrix via associated Plucker
coordinates into a binary six-vector (eq. (1)) and encoding the latter in a particular way into
the tensor product of a triple of the real Pauli matrices (see [11] for motivations and further
details of the final step of such correspondence in a more general physical setting).
Acknowledgements. The work on this topic began in the framework of the ZiF Coop-
eration Group "Finite Projective Ring Geometries: An Intriguing Emerging Link Between
Quantum Information Theory, Black-Hole Physics, and Chemistry of Coupling," held in 2009
at the Center for Interdisciplinary Research (ZiF), University of Bielefeld, Germany. It was
also partially supported by the VEGA grant agency, projects 2/0092/09 and 2/0098/10. We
thank Prof. Hans Havlicek (Vienna) for several clarifying comments and Dr. Petr Pracna
(Prague) for an electronic version of the figure.
References
[1] A. Blunck and H. Havlicek. Projective lines over Jordan systems and geometry of Her-
mitian matrices. Linear Algebra Appl. 433 (2010), 672 -- 680.
[2] A. Blunck and A. Herzer. Kettengeometrien. Eine Einfuhrung. Shaker, Aachen, 2005.
[3] H. Freudenthal. Une ´etude de quelques quadrangles g´en´eralis´es. Ann. Mat. Pura
Appl. (4) 102 (1975), 109 -- 133.
[4] J.-F. Gao, Z.-X. Wan, R.-Q. Feng and D.-J. Wang. Geometry of symmetric matrices
and its applications III. Algebra Colloquium 3 (1996), 135 -- 146.
[5] D.R. Hughes and F.C. Piper. Projective Planes. Springer, New York, 1973.
[6] P. L´evay, M. Saniga, P. Vrana and P. Pracna. Black holes and finite geometry. Phys.
Rev. D 79 (2009), 084036.
[7] S.E. Payne and J.A. Thas. Finite Generalized Quadrangles (Second Edition). EMS Series
of Lectures in Mathematics. European Mathematical Society, Zurich, 2009.
[8] B. Polster. A Geometrical Picture Book. Springer, New York, 1998.
[9] M. Saniga, R. Green, P. L´evay, P. Pracna and P. Vrana. The Veldkamp Space of GQ(2, 4).
International Journal of Geometrical Methods in Modern Physics 7 (2010), in press.
[10] H. Van Maldeghem Generalized Polygons. Birkhauser, Basel 1998.
[11] P. Vrana and P. L´evay. The Veldkamp space of multiple qubits. J. Phys A 42 (2010),
125303.
9
[12] Z.-X. Wan. Geometry of Matrices. World Scientific, Singapore, 1996.
[13] Z.-X. Wan. Geometry of symmetric matrices and its applications I. Algebra Colloquium
1 (1994), 97 -- 120.
[14] Z.-X. Wan. Geometry of symmetric matrices and its applications II. Algebra Collo-
quium 1 (1994), 201 -- 224.
[15] Z.-X. Wan. The Graph of Binary Symmetric Matrices of Order 3. Northeastern Math.
Journal 11 (1995), 1 -- 2.
10
|
1412.7744 | 2 | 1412 | 2016-04-11T16:54:50 | A brief introduction to Enriques surfaces | [
"math.AG"
] | This is a brief introduction to the theory of Enriques surfaces over arbitrary algebraically closed fields. Some new results about automorphism groups of Enriques surfaces are also included. | math.AG | math |
A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO ENRIQUES SURFACES
IGOR V. DOLGACHEV
To Shigeru Mukai on the occasion of his 60th birthday
Abstract. This is a brief introduction to the theory of Enriques
surfaces over arbitrary algebraically closed fields.
Contents
Introduction
1.
2. History
3. Generalities
4. Polarized Enriques surfaces
5. Nodal Enriques surfaces
6. Automorphisms of Enriques surfaces
References
1
2
6
11
15
19
28
1. Introduction
This is a brief introduction to the theory of Enriques surfaces. Over
C, this theory can be viewed as a part of the theory of K3-surfaces,
namely the theory of pairs (X, ι) consisting of a K3-surface X and
a fixed-point-free involution ι on X.
It also can be viewed as the
theory of lattice polarizes K3 surfaces, where the lattice M is the lat-
tice U(2) ⊕ E8(2) with the standard notation of quadratic hyperbolic
lattices [25]. The account of this theory can be found in many intro-
ductory lecture notes, for example, in [7], [41], [49], and in books [6]
or [8]. We intentionally omit this theory and try to treat the theory of
Enriques surfaces without appeal to their K3-covers. This makes more
sense when we do not restrict ourselves with the basic field of com-
plex numbers and take for the ground field an algebraically closed field
of arbitrary characteristic p ≥ 0. This approach to Enriques surfaces
follows the book of F. Cossec and the author [19], the new revised,
corrected and extended version of which is in preparation [20].
The author shares his passion for Enriques surfaces with Shigeru
Mukai and is happy to dedicate this survey to him. He is grateful to
1
2
IGOR V. DOLGACHEV
the organizers of the conference, and especially to Shigeyuki Kond¯o, for
the invitation and opportunity to give a series of lectures on Enriques
surfaces. He also thanks Daniel Allcock for providing proofs of some
group-theoretical results and the thorough referee for pointing out to
many inaccuracies in its earlier version of the survey.
2. History
Let S be a smooth projective surface over an algebraically closed
field k. We use the customary notations from the theory of algebraic
surfaces. Thus we reserve D to denote a divisor on S and very often
identify it with the divisor class modulo linear equivalence. The group
of such divisor classes is the Picard group Pic(S). The group of divisor
classes with respect to numerical equivalence is denoted by Num(S).
We denote by D the linear system of effective divisors linearly equiv-
alent to D. We set
hi(D) = dimk H i(S, OS(D)), pg = h0(KS) = h2(OS), q = h1(OS).
We use the Riemann-Roch Theorem
h0(D) − h1(D) + h2(D) = 1
2(D2 − D · KS) + 1 − q + pg
and Serre's duality hi(D) = h2−i(KS − D).
The theory of minimal models provides us with a birational mor-
phism f : S → S ′ such that either the canonical class KS ′ is nef (i.e.
KS ′ · C ≥ 0 for any effective divisor C), or S ′ is a projective bundle
over Spec k, or over a smooth projective curve B.
If the latter happens the surface S is called ruled and, if S ′ = P2 or
B ∼= P1, it is called rational. A rational surface has pg = q = 0 since
the latter are birational invariants. In 1894, Guido Castelnuovo tried to
prove that the converse is true. He could not do it without an additional
assumption that h0(2KS) = 0. He used the so called termination of
adjoints (showing that, under this assumption C + mKS = ∅ for any
curve C and large m, and, if m is minimal with this property, the
linear system C + (m − 1)KS gives a pencil of rational curves on S
that implies the rationality).
The modern theory of minimal models provides us with a simple
proof of Castelnuovo's Theorem. First use that D2 ≥ 0 for any nef
divisor D.1 Thus, if S is not rational, then we may assume that KS is
nef, hence K 2
S + 1
S ≥ 0. By Riemann-Roch, h0(−KS) + h0(2KS) ≥ K 2
1In fact, take any positive number N and an ample divisor A, then N D + A is
ample and (N D + A)2 = N 2D2 + 2N A · D + A2 must be positive, however if D2 < 0
and N is large enough, we get a contradiction.
ENRIQUES SURFACES
3
implies h0(−KS) ≥ 1, thus −KS ≥ 0 cannot be nef unless KS = 0 in
which case pg = 1.
Still not satisfied, Castelnuovo tried to avoid the additional assump-
tion that h0(2KS) = 0. He discussed this problem with Enriques during
their walks under arcades of Bologna. Each found an example of a sur-
face with pg = q = 0 with some effective multiple of KS. Since the
termination of the adjoint is a necessary condition for rationality, the
surfaces are not rational.
The example of Enriques is a smooth normalization of a non-normal
surface X of degree 6 in P3 that passes with multiplicity 2 through the
edges of the coordinate tetrahedron. Its equation is
F = x2
1x2
2x2
3 + x2
0x2
2x2
3 + x2
0x2
1x2
3 + x2
0x2
1x2
2 + x0x1x2x3q(x0, x1, x2, x3) = 0,
where q is a non-degenerate quadratic form.
The surface X has ordinary singularities: a double curve Γ with ordi-
nary triple points that are also triple points of the surface, and a num-
ber of pinch points. The completion of a local ring at a general point is
isomorphic to k[[t1, t2, t3]]/(t1t2), at triple points k[[t1, t2, t3]]/(t1t2t3),
and at pinch points k[[t1, t2, t3]]/(t2
2t3). Let π : S → X be the
normalization. The pre-image of a general point on Γ consists of two
points, the pre-image of a triple point consists of three points, and the
pre-image of a pinch point consists of one point.
1 + t2
Let c0 = HomOX (π∗OS, OX ). It is an ideal in OX , called the con-
It is equal to the annihilator ideal of π∗OS/OX . Let
ductor ideal.
c = c0OS. This is an ideal in OS and π∗(c) = c0. The duality theorem
for finite morphisms gives an isomorphism
ωS = c ⊗ π∗OX (d − 4),
(1)
where ωS is the canonical sheaf on S and d = deg X (in our case
d = 6). In particular, it implies that c is an invertible sheaf isomorphic
to OS(−∆), where ∆ is an effective divisor on S. Under the assumption
on singularities, c0
∼= JΓ, hence ∆ = π−1(Γ).
Returning to our sextic surface, we find that deg Γ = 6, the number
t of triple points is equal to 4 and each edge contains 4 pinch points.
∼= π∗OS(2)(−∆). The pro-
The canonical class formula shows that ωS
∼= OX (2) ⊗ JΓ (we use that c0 annihilates
jection formula gives π∗ωS
π∗OS/OX ). Since deg Γ = 6, ωS has no sections, i.e. pg(S) = 0. Also,
the exact sequence
0 → JΓ(2) → OX (2) → OΓ(2) → 0
4
IGOR V. DOLGACHEV
allows us to check that H 1(S, ωS) ∼= H 1(X, JΓ(2)) = 0, i.e. q = 0.
We use that the curve Γ is an ACM-scheme, i.e.
the canonical ho-
momorphism of graded algebras ⊕H 0(P3, OP3(n)) → ⊕H 0(Γ, OΓ(n)) is
surjective.
Now,
∼= OS(2KS) ∼= c⊗2 ⊗ π∗OP3(2d − 8)
ω⊗2
S
∼= π∗OX (4)(−2∆) = π∗(OX (4) ⊗ J <2>
),
Γ
Γ
where J <2>
is the second symbolic power of the ideal sheaf c0 = JΓ,
the sheaf of functions vanishing with order ≥ 2 at a general point of Γ.
The global section of the right-hand side defined by the union of four
coordinate planes shows that h0(2KS) > 0, in fact, ω⊗2
S
∼= OS.
It follows from the description of singularities of the sextic that the
pre-image of each edge of the tetrahedron, i.e. an irreducible compo-
nent of the double curve Γ, is an elliptic curve. The pre-image of the
section of the surface with a face of the tetrahedron is the sum of three
elliptic curves F1 + F2 + F3, where Fi · Fj = 1, i 6= j and F 2
i = 0.
The pre-images of the opposite edges are two disjoint elliptic curves
Fi + F ′
i . The preimage of the pencil of quadrics with the base locus
equal to the union of four edges excluding a pair of opposite edges is
an elliptic pencil on S of the form 2Fi = 2F ′
i .
This example of Enriques was included in Castelnuovo's paper [14]
and was very briefly mentioned in Enriques foundational paper [31],
n.39. Enriques returned to his surface only much later, in a paper of
1906 [32], where he proved that any nonsingular surface with q = pg =
0, 2KS ∼ 0 is birationally isomorphic to a sextic surface as above or
its degeneration [32]. Modern proofs of Enriques' results were given in
the sixties, in the dissertations of Boris Averbuch from Moscow [2], [3]
and Michael Artin from Boston [1].
In his paper Castelnuovo considers the birational transformation of
P3 defined by the formula
T : (x0 : x1 : x2 : x3) = (y2y3 : y0y1 : y0y2 : y0y3).
Plugging in this formula in the equation of the sextic, we obtain
F (x0, x1, x2, x3) = y4
0y2
2y2
3Q1(y0y1, y2y3, y1y3, y1y2)
2y2
3Q2(y0y1, y2y3, y1y3, y1y2).
+y3
0y2
0y1y2
2y2
After dividing by y3
degree 5 in P3 given by the equation
3, we obtain that the image of X is a surface of
G = y0Q1(y0y1, y2y3, y1y3, y1y2) + y1Q2(y0y1, y2y3, y1y3, y1y2) = 0.
ENRIQUES SURFACES
5
It has four singular points [1, 0, 0, 0], [0, 1, 0, 0], [0, 0, 1, 0], [0, 0, 0, 1]. The
local computations show that the first two points are double points lo-
cally isomorphic to a singularity z2 + f4(x, y) = 0, where f4(x, y) is a
binary form of degree four without multiple roots. Classics called such
a surface singularity an ordinary tacnode with the tacnodal tangent
plane z = 0. Nowadays we call such a singularity a simple elliptic sin-
gularity of degree 2. Its minimal resolution has a smooth elliptic curve
as the exceptional curve with self-intersection equal to −2. The other
two singular points of the quintic surface are ordinary triple points (=
simple elliptic singularities of degree 3).
One can show the converse: a minimal resolution of a normal quintic
surface with two ordinary triple points and two tacnodes with tacnodal
tangent planes equal to faces of the tetrahedron with vertices at the
singular points is an Enriques surface. In modern times, the quintic
birational models of Enriques surfaces were studied in [38], [54], [55].
Consider the birational transformation of P3 given by the formula
(y0 : y1 : y2 : y3) = (x1x2x3 : x0x2x3 : x0x1x3 : x0x1x2).
(2)
It transforms the sextic surface V (F6) to a birationally isomorphic sex-
tic surface V (G6). The two birational morphisms S → P3 are defined
by linear systems H and H + KS.
Since [0, 0, 0, 1] is a triple point of the quintic surface V (G), we can
write its equation in the form
G = x2
3A3(x0, x1, x2) + 2x3B4(x0, x1, x2) + C5(x0, x1, x2) = 0,
Projecting from the triple point [0, 0, 0, 1], we get a rational double
cover V (G) 99K P2. Its branch curve is a curve of degree 8 given by
the equation B2
4 − C5A3 = 0. The projections of the tacnodal planes
y0 = 0 and y1 = 0 are line components of this octic curve. The residual
sextic curve has a double point at the intersection of these lines and
two tacnodes with tacnodal tangent lines equal to the lines. This is an
Enriques octic.
ℓ1
p1
!"#
•
'&%$
ℓ2
❄❄❄❄
⑧⑧⑧⑧
p2
'!&"%#$
•
In 1906 Enriques proved that any Enriques surface is birationally
isomorphic to the double cover of P2 with branch curve as above or its
degeneration [32].
6
IGOR V. DOLGACHEV
Caslelnuovo gave also his own example of a non-rational surface with
q = pg = 0. It differs from Enriques' one by the property that h0(2K) =
2. In this example, S is given as a minimal resolution of a surface X
of degree 7 in P3 with the following singularities:
• a triple line ℓ;
• a double conic C disjoint from ℓ;
• 3 tacnodes p, q, r with tacnodal tangent planes α = 0, β =
0, γ = 0 containing ℓ.
The equation is
F7 = f 2
3 h + αβγf4 = 0,
where h = 0 is any plane containing the line ℓ, f3 = 0 is a cubic surface
containing ℓ and C. The tacnodal planes are tangent planes to f3 = 0
at the points p, q, r. The quartic surface f4 = 0 contains C as a double
conic.
The pencil of planes through the line ℓ cuts out a pencil of quartic
curves on X with 2 nodes on C. Its members are birationally isomor-
phic to elliptic curves. On the minimal resolution S ′ of X, we obtain
an elliptic fibration with a 2-section defined by the pre-image of the
double conic. Each tacnodal tangent plane cuts out a double conic,
and the pre-image of it on S ′ is a divisor 2Ei + 2Fi, where Ei is a (−1)-
curve and Fi is an elliptic curve. Blowing down E1, E2, E3, we obtain a
minimal elliptic surface S with three double fibers. The canonical class
is equal to −F + F1 + F2 + F3. It is not effective. However, 2KS ∼ F ,
so h0(2K) = 2.
3. Generalities
Recall Noether's Formula
12(1 − q + pg) = K 2
S + c2,
where c2 = P(−1)ibi(S) is the Euler characteristic in the usual topol-
ogy if k = C or l-adic topology otherwise.
In classical definition, an Enriques surface is a smooth projective
surface with q = pg = 0 and 2KS = 0. It is known that q = h1(OS)
is equal to the dimension of the tangent space of the Picard scheme
PicS/k. Thus its connected component Pic0
S/k is trivial. The usual
computation, based on the Kummer exact sequence, gives that b1 =
2 dim Pic0
S/k. Thus b1 = 0. Noether's Formula implies that c2 = 12,
hence b2 = 10. Also, since 2KS = 0, S is a minimal surface of Ko-
daira dimension 0. A modern definition of an Enriques surface is the
following (see [10]):
ENRIQUES SURFACES
7
Definition 1. An Enriques surface is a smooth projective minimal
algebraic surface of Kodaira dimension 0 satisfying b1 = 0 and b2 = 10.
Other minimal surfaces of Kodaira dimension 0 are abelian surfaces
with b1 = 4, b2 = 6, K3-surfaces with b1 = 0, b2 = 22, and hyperelliptic
surfaces with b1 = b2 = 2 (see [10]).
Let S be an Enriques surface. Since the Kodaira dimension is zero,
S = 0. Also, since h0(KS) is bounded, pg ≤ 1.
we obtain that K 2
Noether's Formula gives q = pg.
Recall that Pic0
S/k parameterizes divisor classes algebraically equiv-
alent to zero. It is an open and closed subscheme of the Picard scheme.
PicS/k contains another closed and open subscheme Picτ
S/k that pa-
rameterizes divisor classes numerically equivalent to zero. The group
PicS/k(k) is the Picard group Pic(S) of divisor classes modulo linear
equivalence. The group Pic0(S) := Pic0
S/k(k) is the subgroup of di-
visor classes algebraically equivalent to zero. The group Picτ (S) :=
Picτ
S/k(k) is the subgroup of numerically trivial divisor classes. The
quotient group NS(S) = Pic(S)/Pic0(S) is a finitely generated abelian
group, the N´eron-Severi group of S. The quotient group Pic(S)τ /Pic0(S)
is the torsion subgroup Tors(NS(S)) of the N´eron-Severi group and the
quotient Pic(S)/Picτ (S) is isomorphic NS(S)/Tors(NS(S)). It is a free
abelian group denoted by Num(S).
S/k.
If p = 0, all group schemes are reduced and q = dim Pic0
In
our case, this implies that q = 0. It is known that Pic0
S/k is reduced if
pg = 0 and, and for Enriques surfaces, this always happens if p 6= 2 [11].
If p = 2 and q = pg = 1, the group scheme Pic0
S/k coincides with
Picτ
S/k. It is a finite non-reduced group scheme of order 2 isomorphic
to the group schemes µ2 or α2. In the first case, an Enriques surface is
called a µ2-surface, and in the second case it is called an α2-surface, or
supersingular surface (because in this case the Frobenius acts trivially
on H 1(S, OS) and H 2(S, OS)).
S/k = 0, Pic(S) = NS(S) and Picτ
If h2(OS) = h1(OS) = 0, the Enriques surface S is called classical. In
this case Pic0
S/k is a constant group
scheme defined by the group Tors(NS(S)). By Riemann-Roch, for any
torsion divisor class D 6= 0 in Pic(S), we have h0(D) + h0(KS −D) ≥ 1.
This implies that either D or KS − D is effective. Since a non-trivial
torsion divisor class cannot be effective, we have D ∼ KS.
It is known that KS is numerically trivial if the Kodaira dimension
is equal to 0 (this is a highly non-trivial result, the core of the classifi-
cation of algebraic surfaces). Since h0(2KS) 6= 0 because otherwise S
8
IGOR V. DOLGACHEV
is rational, and KS is numerically trivial, 2KS = 0. So, Tors(Pic(S) is
of order ≤ 2. It is trivial if q = pg = 1 and of order 2 otherwise.
If p 6= 2, the non-trivial 2-torsion element KS in Pic(S) gives rise
to an ´etale double cover f : X → S. We have c2(X) = 2c2(S) = 24,
KX = f ∗(KS) = OX . Thus, X is a K3-surface. If p = 2 and S is a µ2-
surface, the same is true: there exists an ´etale double cover f : X → S
and X is a K3-surface. In other words, an Enriques surface in these
cases is the quotient of a K3-surface by a fixed-point-free involution.
So, the theory of Enriques surfaces becomes a chapter in the theory of
K3 surfaces. This has been much overused in the modern literature by
applying transcendental methods, in particular, the theory of periods
of K3 surfaces, to solve some problems on Enriques surfaces of pure
geometrical nature. These tools do not apply in the case of Enriques
surfaces over fields of positive characteristic, however one can still cheat
for some problems by lifting Enriques surfaces to characteristic 0.
For any finite commutative group scheme G over k, one has a natural
isomorphism
Homgr-sch/k(D(G), PicS/k) ∼= H 1
fl(S, G),
where D(G) is the Cartier dual of G and the right-hand-side is the
group of flat cohomology with coefficients in the sheaf represented by
G. This group is isomorphic to the group of isomorphism classes of
G-torsors over S.
In our case, by taking G = (Z/2Z)k, µ2, α2, we
obtain D(G) = µ2, (Z/2Z)k, α2, respectively. If p 6= 2 the groups µ2
and (Z/2Z)k are isomorphic. Hence, we have a non-trivial (Z/2Z)k-
torsor if p 6= 2, or S is a µ2-surface. The corresponding degree 2 finite
´etale cover π : X → S is a K3-surface. The cover is known as the
K3-cover of an Enriques surface. The Galois group of the cover is a
group of order 2, acting freely on X with the quotient isomorphic to
S. Conversely, any such involution ι on a K3-surface, defines, after
passing to the quotient map X → X/hιi the K3-cover of the Enriques
surface S ∼= X/hιi.
If p = 2 and S is a classical Enriques surface or an α2-surface,
the non-trivial µ2 or α2-torsor defines an inseparable degree 2 cover
X → S, also called the K3-cover. However, the surface X is not
isomorphic to a K3-surface.
It is birationally isomorphic to a K3-
surface or it is a non-normal rational surface.
Let ρ = rank Pic(S) = rank NS(S). If k = C, the Hodge decomposi-
tion H 2(S, C) = H 2,0 + H 1,1 + H 0,2 implies that H 1,1 = b2(S) = 10. By
the Lefschetz Theorem, all integral 2-cohomology classes are algebraic,
hence H 2(S, Z) = Pic(S) and H 2(S, Z)/Tors = Num(S) = Z10. The
Poincar´e Duality implies that the intersection form on Num(S) is a
ENRIQUES SURFACES
9
quadratic form on Num(S) defined by a symmetric matrix with deter-
minant ±1. We say that Num(S) is a quadratic unimodular lattice.
The adjunction formula D2 = 2χ(OS(D)) − 2 for any irreducible effec-
tive divisor D implies that D2 is always even. The Hodge Index The-
orem gives that the signature of the real quadratic space Num(S) ⊗ R
is equal to (1, 9). Finally, Milnor's Theorem about even unimodular
indefinite integral quadratic forms implies that Num(S) = U ⊥ E8,
where U is a hyperbolic plane over Z and E8 is a certain negative
definite unimodular even quadratic form of rank 8.
If p 6= 0, more subtle techniques, among them the duality theorems in
´etale and flat cohomology imply the same result provided one proves
first that ρ = b2 = 10. There are two proofs of this fact one by E.
Bombieri and D. Mumford [11] and another by W. Lang [42]. The first
proof uses the existence of an elliptic fibration on S, the second one uses
the fact that an Enriques surface with no global regular vector fields
can be lifted to characteristic 0. The fact that Num(S) is isomorphic to
the lattice U ⊕E8 was first proven by L. Illusie [36] who used crystalline
cohomology.
One can use the following description of the lattice U ⊕ E8 which we
denote by E10, sometimes it is called the Enriques lattice. Let Z1,10 be
the standard hyperbolic lattice with an orthonormal basis e0, e1, . . . , e10
satisfying (ei, ej) = 0, (e0, e0) = 1, (ei, ei) = −1, i > 0. Then E10 is
isomorphic as a quadratic lattice to the orthogonal complement of the
vector k10 = 3e0 − · · · − e10. The vectors
α0 = e0 − e1 − e2 − e3, αi = ei − ei+1, i = 1, . . . , 9
can be taken as a basis of E10. It is called a canonical root basis. The
matrix of the symmetric bilinear form with respect to this basis is equal
to −2I10 + A, where A is the incidence matrix of the graph pictured in
Fig.2:
α1
•
α2
•
α3
•
α4
•
α5
•
α6
•
α7
•
α8
•
α9
•
α0
•
Figure 1. Enriques lattice
The Enriques lattice E10 is isomorphic to the orthogonal complement
of the canonical class of a rational surface obtained by blowing up 10
points in the projective plane. In fact, if we denote by e0 the class of the
pre-image of a line on the plane and by ei the classes of the exceptional
divisors, we obtain that the canonical class is equal to −3e0 + e1 + · · · +
e10, hence the claim. This explains the close relationship between the
10
IGOR V. DOLGACHEV
theory of Enriques surfaces and the theory of rational surfaces. In fact,
if we take the 10 points in the special position, namely to be the double
points of an irreducible rational curve of degree 6, the rational surface,
called a Coble surface, lies on the boundary of a partial compactification
of the moduli space of Enriques surfaces.
We set
fi = ei + k10, i = 1, . . . , 10.
Since (fi, k10) = 0, these vectors belong to E10. We have
(fi, fj) = 1 − δij,
where δij is the Kronecker symbol. Also, adding up the expressions for
the fi's, we obtain
f1 + · · · + f10 = 9k10 + 3e0 = 3(10e0 − 3e1 − · · · − 3e10).
We set
We have
δ =
1
3
(f1 + · · · + f10) = 10e0 − 3e1 − · · · − 3e10.
(δ, δ) = 10, (δ, fi) = 3, (fi, fj) = 1 − δij.
A sequence of k isotropic vectors in E10 satisfying the last property
is called an isotropic k-sequence. The maximal k possible is equal to
10. An ordered isotropic 10-sequence defines a root basis in E10 as
follows. Consider the sublattice L of E10 spanned by f1, . . . , f10. The
direct computation shows that its discriminant is equal to −9, thus it
is a sublattice of index 3 in E10. The vector δ = 1
3(f1 + · · · + f10) has
integer intersection with each fi, hence it defines an element in the dual
lattice L∗ such that 3δ ∈ L. This implies that δ ∈ E10 and we may set
α∗
0 = δ, α∗
1 = δ − f1, α∗
2 = 2δ − f1 − f2, α∗
i = 3δ − f1 − · · · − fi, i ≥ 3.
1, . . . , α∗
The vectors (α∗
is a canonical root basis with the intersection graph as in Figure 1.
The following matrix is the intersection matrix of the vectors α∗
10) form a basis of E10 and its dual basis α0, . . . , α9
i . It
was shown to me first by S. Mukai during our stay in Bonn in 1983.
ENRIQUES SURFACES
11
9
14 21 18 15 12
9
6
8
18 28 24 20 16 12
14 12 10
3
10
2
7
14
4
21 14 28 42 36 30 24 18 12 6
18 12 24 36 30 25 20 15 10 5
4
15 10 20 30 25 20 16 12
3
9
12
9
6
2
1
4
6
3
2
0
16 24 20 16 12
12 18 15 12
9
6
8
8
4
4
3
12 10
6
5
6
4
8
8
6
4
2
1
7
4
9
8
6
4
2
.
Let O(E10) be the orthogonal group of the lattice E10, i.e. the group
of automorphisms of E10 preserving the quadratic form. We have
O(E10) = W (E10) × {±1},
where W (E10) is the Weyl group of E10 generated by reflections sαi :
x 7→ x + (x, αi)αi. It coincides with the full reflection group of E10, the
group generated by sα : x 7→ x + (x, α)α, where α is any vector with
(α, α) = −2 (see, for example, [27]).
4. Polarized Enriques surfaces
The moduli space of Enriques surfaces exists as a stack only.
If
p 6= 2, it is an irreducible smooth unirational Artin stack of dimension
10. Over C, it admits a coarse moduli space isomorphic to an arith-
metic quotient of a symmetric domain of orthogonal type (or type IV).
If p = 2, it consists of two irreducible unirational components inter-
secting along a 9-dimensional substack. One component corresponds to
classical Enriques surfaces and another one corresponds to µ2-surfaces.
The intersection corresponds to α2-surfaces. This is a recent result of
Christian Liedtke [44].
To consider a quasi-projective moduli space one has to polarize the
surface. A polarized surface is a pair (S, D), where D is a nef divisor
class with D2 > 0 and D is base-point-free. An isomorphism of po-
larized surfaces (S, D) → (S ′, D′) is an isomorphism f : S → S ′ such
that f ∗(D′) ∼ D. Let us discuss such divisor classes.
Let D be any irreducible curve on S. By adjunction formula, D2 ≥
If D2 = −2, then D ∼= P1. An Enriques surface containing a
−2.
smooth rational curve is called nodal and unnodal otherwise. If D2 ≥ 0,
by Riemann-Roch, h0(D) > 0. Let W n
S be the subgroup of the reflection
group of Num(S) generated by the reflections sα, where α is the class
of a smooth rational curve. Applying elements of W n
S , we obtain that
∼= P1. If
D ∼ D0 + P Ri, where D0 is a nef effective divisor, and Ri
12
IGOR V. DOLGACHEV
D is nef and D2 ≥ 2, then h1(D) = 0 and dim D = 1
2D2. If D2 = 0,
then D = kE, where h0(E) = 1 but h0(2E) = 2. The linear system
2E is a pencil of curves of arithmetic genus 1. It defines a morphism
f : S → P1 whose general fiber is a curve of arithmetic genus 1. It is
called a genus one fibration. A general fiber is nonsingular if p 6= 2 but
could have a cusp if p = 2. In the latter case the genus one fibration
is called a quasi-elliptic fibration. If KS 6= 0 (resp. KS = 0), a genus
one fibration has two fibers (resp. one fiber) of the form 2F , called a
double fiber.
For any nef divisor D with D2 > 0, let Φ(D) = min{D · E}, where
E2 = 0. The function Φ satisfies an inequality (see [19], Corollary
2.7.1)
Φ(D)2 ≤ D2.
We have Φ(D) = 1 if and only if D has base-points (two, counting
with multiplicity). Also Φ(D) = 2 if and only D defines a double
cover of a normal surface, or a birational morphism onto a non-normal
surface, or D2 = 4 and the map is of degree 4 onto P2. In the first case,
the linear system is called superelliptic (renamed to bielliptic in [20]).
Finally, Φ(D) ≥ 3 if and only if D defines a birational morphism onto
a normal surface with at most rational double points as singularities.
Here are examples.
If D2 = 2, then D ∼ E1 + E2 or D ∼ 2E1 + R + KS, where 2Ei are
genus one pencils and R ∼= P1 such that Ei · E2 = 1 and R · E1 = 1.
The linear system D is a pencil of curves of arithmetic genus 2.
Assume D2 = 4 and Φ(D) = 1, then, after blowing up the two base
points, we obtain a degree 2 map to P2 with the branch divisor equal to
an Enriques octic which may be degenerate if S is nodal. If Φ(D) = 2,
and S is unnodal, then D ∼ E1 + E2, where 2Ei are genus one pencils
and E1 · E2 = 2. The map given by D is a finite map of degree 4
onto P2. If p 6= 2, its branch locus is a curve of degree 12, the image of
the dual of a nonsingular cubic curve under a map P2 → P2 given by
conics [56]. If p = 2, the map could be inseparable. If S is a µ2-surface,
the map is separable and its branch curve is a plane cubic. If p 6= 2
or S is a µ2-surface, the preimage D of D on the K3-cover X defines
a linear system D on X that maps X onto a complete intersection of
three quadrics in P5.
Assume D2 = 6 and Φ(D) = 2. Again, if S is unnodal, then D ∼
E1 + E2 + E3, where 2Ei are genus one pencils and Ei · Ej = 1. The
map is a birational map onto an Enriques sextic in P3. The moduli
ENRIQUES SURFACES
13
space of polarized surfaces (S, D) admits a compactification, a GIT-
quotient of the space of sextic surfaces passing through the edges of
the tetrahedron with multiplicity two.
Assume D2 = 8 and Φ(D) = 2. If S is unnodal, then D ∼ 2E1 + 2E2
or D ∼ 2E1 +2E2 +KS, where 2Ei are genus one pencils and E1 ·E2 =
1. In the first case, the map given by the linear system D is a double
cover φ : S → D4, where D is a 4-nodal quartic del Pezzo surface.
It is isomorphic to a complete intersection of two quadrics in P4 with
equations
x0x1 + x2
2 = 0, x3x4 + x2
2 = 0.
Its minimal resolution is isomorphic to the blow-up X of five points in
the projective plane equal to the singular points of an Enriques octic
curve. The rational map X 99K D4 is given by the anti-canonical linear
system. The cover ramifies over the singular points and a curve from
OD(2). Thus, birationally, the cover is isomorphic to the double cover
of the plane branched over an Enriques octic.
If S is nodal, the degree 8 polarization can be also given by the linear
system 4E + 2R or 4E + 2R + KS, where 2E is a genus one pencil
and R is a (−2)-curve with E ·R = 1. In the first case, the linear system
4E + 2R defines a degree 2 cover of a degenerate 4-nodal quartic del
Pezzo surface. Its equations are
x0x1 + x2
2 = 0, x3x4 + x2
0 = 0.
It has two ordinary nodes and one rational double point of type A3. Its
minimal resolution is isomorphic to the blow-up of four points in the
plane equal to singular points of a degenerate Enriques octic.
Figure 2 is the picture of the branch curve of the rational map S 99K
D, where D is a minimal resolution of singularities of D. We assume
here that p 6= 2.
If S admits a K3-cover, then the preimage of the linear system D
on the cover defines a degree 2 map onto P1 × P1 with branch curve
of type (4, 4) invariant with respect to an involution of the quadric
with four isolated fixed points. This is sometimes referred to as the
Horikawa model.
The linear system D + KS, where D = 2E1 + 2E2 or 4E + 2R
as above, maps S birationally onto a non-normal surface of degree 8 in
P4. So, we see that the type of polarization depends on the linear but
not the numerical equivalence class of the divisor.
Note that all such linear systems exist on any Enriques surface, nodal
or not.
Finally, assume D2 = 10 and Φ(D) = 3. If S is unnodal, the linear
system D defines a closed embedding onto a surface F of degree 10
14
IGOR V. DOLGACHEV
⑧
⑧
⑧
⑧⑧
-2
⑧
⑧
⑧⑧
8?9>
-1
?>=<
-1
❄❄
❄
❄
❄❄
-2
❄
❄
❄
-1
:=;<
⑧
⑧
⑧
⑧⑧
-2
⑧
⑧
⑧⑧
8?9>
-1
❄
❄
❄
❄❄
-2
❄
❄
❄❄
89:;
-1
⑧
⑧⑧
⑧
-2
⑧
⑧⑧
⑧
⑧
❄
❄
❄
❄❄
-2
❄
❄
❄❄
-2
❄❄
❄
❄
❄❄
-2
❄
❄
❄
-1
:=;<
⑧
⑧⑧
⑧
-2
⑧
⑧⑧
⑧
⑧
non-special
special
Figure 2. Branch curve of a bielliptic map (p 6= 2)
in P5. Its homogeneous ideal is generated by 10 cubics. This model
was first studied by Gino Fano in [33] and [34]. One can represent
the divisor class 3D as the sum of 10 divisor classes E1 + · · · + E10
whose numerical classes form an isotropic 10-sequence in Num(S). The
images of Ei and E ′
i ∈ Ei + KS are plane cubics contained in F. The
linear system D − Ei − Ej, i 6= j, consists of an isolated genus one
curve Eij which is mapped onto a curve of degree 4 on F. The linear
system Ei + Ej + Ek, k 6= i 6= j, maps S onto an Enriques sextic S ′
in P3, the image of Eij is an elliptic quintic, and the images of Ei and
Ej are coplanar edges of the tetrahedron. The images of the 7 curves
Es, s 6= i, j, k, and 21 curves Eab, a, b 6= i, j, k, are plane cubic curves on
S ′. The residual cubic curve is the unique curve in the linear system
E1 + E2 + E3 − Es or E1 + E2 + E3 − Eab, they intersect at 6 points
lying on the edges and three additional points. If p 6= 2, we also have
the adjoint 28 curves E ′
ij numerically equivalent to Ei and Eij,
respectively. The corresponding planes containing the images of the
curves in a pair of adjoint curves intersect along a line in a face of the
tetrahedron. The image of the cubic curve Es (resp. Eab) under the
Cremona transformation (2) is the cubic curve E ′
i and E ′
s (resp. E ′
ij).
Note that the numerical equivalence classes of the curves Ei are
determined uniquely by the choice of the Fano polarization D. A
choice of an ordered representatives Ei of these classes such that 3D ∼
E1 +· · ·+E10 defines a supermarking of S, i.e. a splitting of the projec-
tion Pic(S) → Num(S) preserving the intersection forms. A marking
of S is just an isomorphism of quadratic lattices Num(S) → E10. So,
there are 29 supermarkings lifting a given marking. A supermarking of
S defines a choice of 10 planes in P5 cutting out 10 plane cubics on the
Fano model F. One can show that the moduli space of supermarked
ENRIQUES SURFACES
15
unnodal Enriques surfaces is irreducible and it is mapped into an ir-
reducible component of the variety of ordered 10-tuples of mutually
intersecting planes in P5 (see [29]).
If S is nodal and KS 6= 0, one of the Fano polarization D or D + KS
maps S into a nonsingular quadric in P5. If we identify the quadric
with the Grassmann variety G(2, 4) of lines in P3, then the image of S
is isomorphic to the Reye congruence of lines, the set of lines in a web
of quadrics in P3 that are contained in a pencil from the web. Such
polarization of a nodal surface is called a Reye polarization [18].
If
D is a Reye polarization, then D + KS maps S into P5 that can be
identified with a general 5-dimensional linear system of quadrics. The
image of S is the locus of reducible quadrics.
An interesting open problem is to determine the Kodaira dimension
If D2 = 4 and
of the moduli space of polarized Enriques surface.
D = E1 + E2 with E1 · E2 = 2, then the moduli space is rational [13].
If D = E1 + E2 + E3 is an Enriques sextic polarization, then, up to
a projective transformation, a sextic model is defined uniquely by the
quadratic form q. This shows that the moduli space is also rational.
The moduli space of Enriques surfaces with polarization of degree 8
and type 2E1 + 2E2 is birationally isomorphic to the GIT-quotient
OD4(2)/Aut(D4). It can be shown to be rational [20]. The moduli
space of Enriques surfaces with a Fano polarization is birationally cov-
ered by the space of quintic elliptic curves in P3 [57]. It was shown in
loc.cit. that the latter space is rational and of dimension 10 . Thus the
moduli space of Fano polarized Enriques surfaces is unirational.
It is conjectured that the moduli space of polarized Enriques sur-
faces is always unirational (or, at least of negative Kodaira dimen-
sion).2 Note that, over C, the coarse moduli space of Enriques surface
is rational [40].
5. Nodal Enriques surfaces
Recall that a nodal Enriques surface is an Enriques surface S con-
taining a smooth rational curve. By adjunction formula, the self-
intersection of such curve is equal to −2, for this reason it is often
called a (−2)-curve. Over C, a smooth rational curve R on S splits
under the K3-cover π : X → S into the disjoint sum of two smooth
rational curves R+ and R−. The Picard group Pic(X) contains the
divisor class R+ − R− that does not belong to π∗(Pic(S)). The theory
2A recent paper of V. Gritsenko and K. Hulek (Moduli of polarized Enriques
surfaces, math.AG.arXiv:1502.02723) disproves this conjecture.
16
IGOR V. DOLGACHEV
of periods of lattice polarized K3 surfaces shows that the nodal sur-
faces form an irreducible hypersurface in the coarse moduli space of
Enriques surfaces. Over any algebraically closed field of characteristic
p 6= 2 one can show that a nodal Enriques surface is isomorphic to a
Reye congruence of lines in P3. The moduli space of Reye congruences
is an irreducible variety of dimension 9. On the other hand, the moduli
space of Enriques sextics is of dimension 10. This shows that a general
Enriques surface is unnodal.
There are several invariants that measure how nodal an Enriques
surface could be. The first one is the non-degeneracy invariant d(S)
defined in [19], p. 182. It is equal to the maximal k such that there
exists an isotropic k sequence (f1, . . . , fk) in Num(S) where each fi is
a nef numerical divisor class. If S is unnodal, then d(S) = 10, maximal
possible. It is known that d(S) ≥ 3 if p 6= 2. However, no example of
a surface with d(S) = 3 is known to me. Note that this result implies,
if p 6= 2, that any Enriques surface admits a non-degenerate Enriques
sextic model or a non-degenerate double octic model.
The next invariant was introduced by Viacheslav Nikulin [53]. To
define it we assume that p 6= 2, or S is a µ2-surface.
Let π : X → S be the K3-cover and ι be the fixed-point involu-
tion with quotient isomorphic to S. Denote by N + (N −) the subgroup
of Pic(X) that consists of invariant (anti-invariant) divisor classes. It
is clear that N − is contained in the orthogonal complement (N +)⊥
in Pic(S). Also, since G = hιi acts freely, N + = π∗(Pic(S)). Since
N + contains an ample divisor, N − does not contain (−2)-curves. By
the Hodge Index Theorem, N − is negative definite. The quotient
group N −/Im(ι∗ − 1) = Ker(ι∗ + 1)/Im(ι∗ − 1) is isomorphic to the
cohomology group H 1(G, Pic(X)), where G = hιi. The Hochshild-
Serre spectral sequence in ´etale cohomology gives a boundary map
2 = H 3(G, Gm(X)) ∼= Hom(G, k∗).
d2 : E1,1
Its kernel coincides with the kernel of the homomorphism of the Brauer
groups π∗ : Br(S) → Br(X), see [9]. It is shown in loc.cit. that d2
coincides with the norm map Nm : Pic(X) → Pic(S)3 restricted to
Ker(ι∗ + 1) and its image is contained in Ker(π∗) = hKSi. It is known
that Br(X) is of order 2 if KS 6= 0 and it is trivial otherwise (see [19],
Proposition 5.3.5). Thus, the order of N −/Im(ι∗ − 1) is at most 4, and
in the case when S is a µ2-surface, the group is trivial.
2 = H 1(G, Pic(X)) → E3,0
Consider the subgroup N −
0 = Im(ι∗ − 1) of N −. For any x ∈ Pic(X),
we have ι∗(x) + x ∈ π∗(Pic(S)), hence (ι∗(x) + x)2 = 2x2 + 2x· ι∗(x) ≡ 0
3Recall that the norm map is defined on invertible sheaves by setting Nm(L) =
det π∗L.
ENRIQUES SURFACES
17
mod 4, and we obtain that x · ι∗(x) is even. This implies that (x −
ι∗(x))2 ≡ 0 mod 4. Thus the lattice N −
2) is an integral even lattice.
Note that N +( 1
0 ( 1
2) ∼= E10.
Let us consider elements δ− = (ι∗ − 1)(x) in N −
0 such that δ2
− = −4
and δ+ := (ι∗ + 1)(x) is equal to π∗(y), where y2 = −2. Let ∆+
S be the
set of such classes y. Note that, if δ− = (ι∗ − 1)(x′), then x′ = x + z,
where ι∗(z) = z, hence δ+ = ι∗(x) + x + 2z = π∗(y′), where y′ = y + 2z′.
+
S be the
Thus each δ− determines a unique coset in Num(S). Let ∆
subset of such cosets. Let W (∆+
S ) be the subgroup of WS generated by
reflections in the classes of elements of ∆+
S ), we
have π∗(α) = ι∗(β) + β for some β ∈ Pic(S), so that, for and y ∈ ∆+
S ,
we get
S . For any α ∈ W (∆+
π∗(sα(y)) = π∗(y + (y, α)α) = ι∗(x + (y, α)β) + (x + (y, α)β).
This shows that ∆+
S is invariant with respect to W (∆+
S ).
Let
Num(S) := Num(S)/2Num(S) ∼= E10 := E10/2E10
∼= F10
2 .
We equip the vector space E10 with the quadratic form q : E10 → F2
defined by
q(x + 2E10) = 1
2x2 mod 2.
One can show that the quadratic form is non-degenerate and is of even
type, i.e. equivalent to the orthogonal direct sum of five hyperbolic
planes x1x2 + x3x4 + · · · + x9x10. Its orthogonal group is denoted by
O+(10, F2). It contains a simple subgroup of index 2. We denote by
(x, y) the value of the associated symmetric form b(x, y) = q(x + y) +
q(x) + q(y) on a pair x, y ∈ Num(S).
+
Let us identify Num(S) with E10. Nikulin defines the r-invariant of
S in Num(S). This
of E10 equal to the image of ∆+
S as the subset ∆S
is a subset J of F10
• J ⊂ q−1(1);
• for any r ∈ J, sr(J) = J, where sr(x) = x + (x, r)r.
2 satisfying two properties
Note that ∆+
S contains divisor classes y with y2 = −2 such that
y ≡ R mod 2Num(S) for some (−2)-curve R (it is easy to see, using
Riemann-Roch on X, that y or −y is effective). So, ∆S
contains the
set RS of cosets of (−2)-curves on S and the larger set RS
obtained
from this set by applying sr, where r ∈ RS. I do not know whether
this larger set coincides with ∆S
+
+
.
′
Another invariant, the R-invariant is defined by Nikulin as follows.
2) spanned by the classes δ−. It is
Let K to be the sublattice of N −
0 ( 1
18
IGOR V. DOLGACHEV
a negative definite lattice spanned by vectors of norm −2. It follows
that it is a root lattice, the orthogonal sum of root lattices of types
A, D, E. We also have a homomorphism φ : K/2K → Num(S) that
sends δ− to y + 2Num(S), where π∗(y) = δ+. Note that the image of
φ is the linear subspace spanned by ∆S
and the image of the cosets
. The Nikulin R-invariant is the pair (K, H),
of the δ−'s is the set ∆S
where H = Ker(φ).
+
+
A slightly different definition of the R-invariant was given by S.
Mukai [49]. He considers the kernel of the norm map Nm : Pic(X) →
Pic(S) and defines the root system of S as a sublattice of Ker(Nm)( 1
2)
generated by vectors with norm (−2).
Over C, one can use the theory of periods of K3 surfaces to show that
Enriques surfaces with rankK = r form a codimension r subvariety in
the moduli space.
′
If p = 2 and S is not a µ2-surface, we still have the subset RS
of F10
2
and we define the r-invariant of S as the smallest subset r(S) of RS
such that any RS
can be written as a sum of elements from r(S). We
picture r(S) as a graph with vertices in r(S) and the edges connecting
two elements x, y in r(S) such that (x, y) = 1.
′
′
#r(S) = 1 :
#r(S) = 2 :
(a)
#r(S) = 3 :
(a)
•
•
•
(b)
•
•
•
•❄❄❄❄❄
•
⑧⑧⑧⑧⑧
(b)
•
•
(c)
•
•
(d)
•
•
•
•
•❄❄❄❄❄
An Enriques surface is called a general nodal if #r(S) = 1, i.e. any
two (−2)-curves are congruent modulo 2Num(S). In terms of the R-
invariant, it means that (K, H) = (A1, {0}). The following theorem
gives equivalent characterizations of general nodal surfaces [20].
Theorem 2. The following properties are equivalent.
(i) S is a general nodal Enriques surface;
(ii) Any genus one fibration on S contains at most one reducible
fiber that consists of two irreducible components. A half-fiber is
irreducible.
(ii') Any genus one fibration on S contains at most one reducible
fiber that consists of two irreducible components.
(iii) Any two (−2)-curves are f -equivalent.
(iv) For any Fano polarization h, the set Πh = {R ∈ RS : R · h ≤ 4}
consists of one element.
ENRIQUES SURFACES
19
(v) For any d ≤ 4, S admits a Fano polarization h such that Πh =
{R}, where R · h = d.
(vi) A genus one pencil that admits a smooth rational curve as a
2-section does not contain reducible fibres.
Here two (−2)-curves R and R′ are called f -equivalent if there exists
a sequence of genus one fibrations 2E1, . . . , 2Ek−1 and a sequence of
(−2)-curves R1 = R, . . . , Rk = R′ such that
R1 + R2 ∈ 2E1, R2 + R3 ∈ 2E2, . . . , Rk−1 + Rk ∈ 2Ek−1.
Obviously, the f -equivalence is an equivalence relation on the set of
nodal curves.
6. Automorphisms of Enriques surfaces
One of the main special features of Enriques surfaces is the richness
of its symmetry group, i.e the group Aut(S) of birational automor-
phisms. Since S is a minimal model, this group coincides with the
group of biregular automorphisms. The group of biregular automor-
phisms of any projective algebraic variety X over k is the group of
k-points of a group scheme AutX/k of locally finite type. This means
that the connected component of the identity Aut0
X/k of AutX/k is an
algebraic group scheme over k, and the group of connected components
is countable. The tangent space of Aut0
X/k at the identity point is iso-
morphic to the space of regular vector fields H 0(X, ΘX/k). All of this
can be found, for example, in [45].
It is known that in the case of an Enriques surface dim H 0(S, ΘS/k) ≤
1 and the equality takes place only if p = 2 and S is an α-surface or an
exceptional classical Enriques surface, the latter surfaces were described
in [30].
Theorem 3. Let S be an Enriques surface. Then dim Aut0
h0(ΘS/k) = 0, then AutS/k is reduced and Aut0
S/k is trivial.
S/k = 0. If
Proof. The second assertion follows immediately from the discussion in
above. Suppose H 0(S, ΘS/k) 6= 0. If AutS/k is reduced then Aut0
S/k
is a one-dimensional connected algebraic group G over k. There are
three possibilities: G = Gm, Ga, or G is an elliptic curve. A connected
algebraic group acts trivially on the N´eron-Severi group of S. Since
S has a non-trivial genus one fibration with some rational fibers, the
group G preserves the set of singular fibers, and being connected, pre-
serves any singular fiber. If G is an elliptic curve, then G must fix any
S,x/mk+1
point x on a singular fiber. Thus G acts linearly on any mk
S,x ,
and being complete, it act trivially. This implies that G acts trivially
20
IGOR V. DOLGACHEV
on the completion of the local ring OS,x, hence on the ring itself, hence
on its fraction ring, hence on S.
Suppose G is a linear group of positive dimension acting on an irre-
ducible algebraic variety X. We can always choose a one-dimensional
subgroup of G and assume that it acts freely on X. Then, by Rosen-
licht's Theorem, there exists a G-invariant open subset U of X such
that the geometric quotient U → U/G exists and its fibers are orbits
of G. As is well-known this implies that U is a principal homogenous
space over U/G (see, for example, [51], Proposition 0.9). Thus U, and
hence X, is a ruled variety, i.e. it is birationally isomorphic to P1×U/G.
Applying this to S, we find a contradiction.
(cid:3)
Enriques himself realized that Aut(S) is an infinite discrete group.
In his paper [32] of 1906 he remarks that any S containing a general
pencil of elliptic curves has infinite automorphism group. The paper
ends with the question whether there exists a special degeneration of
the sextic model such that the group of automorphisms is finite.
A usual way to investigate Aut(S) is to consider its natural represen-
tation by automorphisms of some vector space or of an abelian group.
In our case, this would be Num(S). Since automorphisms preserve the
intersection form, we have a homomorphism
ρ : Aut(S) → O(Num(S)) ∼= O(E10).
From now on, we fix an isomorphism Num(S) ∼= E10 and identify these
two lattices. Since automorphisms preserve the ample cone in Num(S),
the image does not contain −1E10, hence it is contained in the preimage
WS of the reflection group W (E10) in O(Num(S)). It is a subgroup of
O(Num(S)) generated by reflections in numerical divisor classes x with
x2 = −2. The kernel of ρ preserves the set {h, h + KS}, where h is a
very ample divisor class. Thus it preserves 2h, hence it is contained in
a group of projective automorphisms of some projective space Pn. It
must be a linear algebraic group, hence it is a finite group.
The reduction homomorphism E10 → E10 = E10/2E10 defines a ho-
momorphism of the groups W (E10) → O+(10, F2). Let
W (E10)(2) := Ker(W (E10) → O+(10, F2)).
It is called the 2-level congruence subgroup of W (E10). The preimage
of W (E10)(2) in WS will be denoted by WS(2). It does not depend on
a choice of an isomorphism WS
∼= W (E10).
Proposition 4 (A. Coble). The subgroup W (E10)(2) is the smallest
normal subgroup containing the involution σ = 1U ⊕ (−1)E8 for some
(hence any) orthogonal decomposition E10 = U ⊕ E8.
ENRIQUES SURFACES
21
Proof. A proof suggested by Eduard Looijenga and following Coble's
incomplete proof is computational. It is reproduced in [19], Chapter 2,
§10. The following nice short proof is due to Daniel Allcock.
Let Γ be the minimal normal subgroup containing σ. It is generated
by the conjugates of σ in W = W (E10). Let (f, g) be the standard basis
of the hyperbolic plane U. If α0, . . . , α7 is the basis of E8 corresponding
to the subdiagram of type E8 of the Coxeter diagram of the Enriques
lattice E10, then we may take
f = 3α0 + 2α1 + 4α2 + 6α3 + 5α4 + 4α5 + 3α6 + 2α7 + α8,
and g = f + α9. The stabilizer Wf of f in W is the semi-direct product
E8 ⋊ W (E8) ∼= W (E9), where E9 is the affine group of type E8 and
W (E9) is its Weyl group, the reflection group with the Coxeter diagram
of type T2,3,6. The image φv of v ∈ E8 = U ⊥ under the map φ : E8 →
Wf is the transformation
φv : x 7→ x − (
v2
2
(f, x) + (v, x))f + (x, f )v.
The inclusion of W (E8) in W (E9) is natural, it consists of compositions
of the reflections in the roots α0, . . . , α7. In particular, any w ∈ W (E8)
acts identically on E ⊥
8 = U. The image of σ in W (E9) is equal to
−idE8 ∈ W (E8) ⊂ W (E9). Let us compute the φv-conjugates of σ. If
x ∈ E8, we have
φv ◦ σ ◦ φ−v(x) = φv(σ(x + (v · x)f ))
= φv(−x + (v · x)f ) = (−x + (v · x)f ) + (v · x)f = −x + 2(v · x)f.
Thus the intersection of Γ with Wf is equal to φ(2E8) : 2. The quotient
Wf /Γ ∩ Wf injects into O(¯E10) ∼= O+(10, F2).
Let us consider the subgroup H generated by Wf and Γ. Since
Wf normalizes Γ ∩ Wf , the kernel of the homomorphism H → O(¯E10)
coincides with Γ. To finish the proof it suffices to show that H coincides
with the preimage W ¯f in W of the stabilizer subgroup of the image ¯f of
f in O(¯E10). Indeed, the kernel of W ¯f → O(¯E10) is equal to W (E10)(2)
and hence coincides with Γ.
Let us consider a sublattice L of E10 generated by the roots α0, . . . , α8,
9, where α′
9 = α8 + 2g − f . The Dynkin diagram of this basis is the
α′
following
α1
•
α2
•
α3
•
α4
•
α5
•
α6
•
α7
•
α8
•
α0
•
α′
•
9
22
IGOR V. DOLGACHEV
Here all the roots, except α′
9, are orthogonal to f . So, H contains the
reflections defined by these roots. Also the root α8 − f is orthogonal
to f , and α′
9 is transformed to it under the conjugate of the group
φ(2E8) stabilizing g (instead of f ). So H contains sα′
9 too. The Coxeter
diagram contains three subdiagrams of affine types E8, E8 and D8. The
Weyl group is a crystallographic group with a Weyl chamber being a
simplex of finite volume with 3 vertices at the boundary. This implies
that H has at most 3 orbits of (± pairs) of primitive isotropic vectors in
E10. On the other hand, W ¯f contains H and has at least three orbits of
them, because the stabilizer of ¯f in O(¯E10) has three orbits of isotropic
vectors (namely, { ¯f}, the set of isotropic vectors distinct from ¯f and
orthogonal to ¯f , and the set of isotropic vectors not orthogonal to ¯f ).
This implies that the set of orbits of primitive isotropic vectors of H
and W ¯f is the same. Since the stabilizers of f in these two groups are
both equal to Wf , it follows that H = W ¯f .
(cid:3)
Theorem 5. Let S be an unnodal Enriques surface. Then ρ : Aut(S) →
WS is injective and the image contains WS(2).
Proof. In the complex case the assertion about the injectivity of the
map follows from the classification of automorphisms that act identi-
cally on Num(S) due to S. Mukai and Y. Namikawa [46], [47]. Without
assumption on the characteristic, one can deduce it from the arguments
in [26].
Consider the linear system D = 2E1 + 2E2 with D2 = 8. As was
explained in section 4, it defines a degree 2 map S → D4 ⊂ P4, where D4
is a 4-nodal quartic del Pezzo surface. Let σ be the deck transformation
of the cover and σ∗ = ρ(σ) ∈ WS.4
It is immediate that σ∗ leaves
invariant the divisor classes of E1 and E2, and acts as the minus identity
on the orthogonal complement of the sublattice hE1, E2i generated by
E1, E2. The latter is isomorphic to the hyperbolic plane U and U ⊥ is
isomorphic to the lattice E8 (sorry for the confusing notation). Now any
conjugate of σ∗ in WS is also realized by some automorphism. In fact,
w · σ∗ · w−1 leaves invariant w(hE1, E2i), and the deck transformation
corresponding to the linear system 2w(E1)+2w(E2) realizes w·σ∗·w−1.
Now we invoke the previous proposition that says that W (E10)(2) is
the minimal normal subgroup of W (E10) containing σ∗.
(cid:3)
4Since S has no smooth rational curves, the cover is a finite separable map of
degree 2.
ENRIQUES SURFACES
23
Here is the history of the theorem. We followed the proof of A.
Coble in the similar case when S is a Coble surface. This surface is a
degeneration of an Enriques surface, although I do not know whether
one can deduce the result from Coble's theorem.
Over C, the proof follows immediately from the Global Torelli The-
orem for K3-surfaces. It was first stated by V. Nikulin [52] and, in-
dependently, by W. Barth and C. Peters [4]. Also the Global Torelli
Theorem implies that the subgroup generated by Aut(S) and the sub-
group W n
S generated by reflections in the classes of (−2)-curves is of
finite index in WS. In particular, Aut(S) is finite if and only W n
S is of
finite index in WS. If S has no nonzero regular vector fields, then the
same is true in any characteristic. This follows easily from the proof of
Theorem 2.1 in a recent paper [43].
If k = C, one can show that for a general, in the sense of moduli,
Enriques surface, Aut(S) ∼= W (E10)(2).
The interesting case is when S is a nodal Enriques surface. Over C,
Nikulin proves that, up to finite groups, Aut(S) is determined by the
r or the R-invariant of S. He deduces the following theorem from the
Global Torelli Theorem for K3-surfaces [53].
Theorem 6 (V. Nikulin). Let W (S; ∆+
S , and let W (∆+
ing invariant the set ∆+
W (S; ∆+
phism ρ : Aut(S) → W (S; ∆+
cokernel.
S ) be the subgroup of WS leav-
S ) be the normal subgroup of
S ) generated by reflections in such curves. Then the homomor-
S ) has a finite kernel and a finite
S )/W (∆+
Let r(S) be the r-invariant of S and let hr(S)i be the subspace of
AS generated by r(S) and RS be the preimage of hr(S)i⊥ under the
reduction modulo 2E map. This is called the Reye lattice of S. An
equivalent definition is
RS = {x ∈ Num(S) : x · R ≡ 0 mod 2 for any (−2)-curve R}.
Obviously, the action of Aut(S) on S preserves the set of (−2)-curves,
hence preserves the Reye lattice. Thus we have a homomorphism
ρ : Aut(S) → O(RS).
Let ARS = R∨
S/RS be the discriminant group of RS. Since any element
in the image of ρ lifts to an isometry of the whole lattice E10, it must
be contained in the kernel of the natural homomorphism O(RS) →
O(ARS ).
Suppose S is a general nodal Enriques surface. In this case the Reye
lattice RS is a sublattice of Num(S) of index 2. It is isomorphic to the
lattice U ⊕ E7 ⊕ A1. One can choose a basis defined by δ, E1, . . . , E10 as
24
IGOR V. DOLGACHEV
above such that the nontrivial coset is equal to the coset of the divisor
class α = δ − 2E10. Then RS = {x ∈ E10 : x · α ∈ 2Z} has a basis
formed by the divisor classes
β0 = δ − E1 − · · · − E4, βi = Ei − Ei+1, i = 1, . . . , 9.
The matrix of the quadratic lattice is equal to −2I10 + B, where B is
the incidence matrix of the graph:
β1
•
β2
•
β3
•
β4
•
β5
•
β6
•
β7
•
β8
•
β9
•
•
β0
Figure 3. Reye lattice
We denote this quadratic lattice by E2,4,6 and call it the Reye lattice.
Note that the Reye lattice is 2-reflective, i.e. the subgroup Ref2(E2,4,6)
generated by reflections in vectors α with α2 = −2 is of finite index
in the orthogonal group (see [27], Example 4.11). However, it is larger
than the Weyl group W2,4,6 of the lattice E2,4,6 generated by reflections
in the vectors βi. The former group is generated by the reflections
sβi and the vector r = f − β9, where f = 2β0 + β1 + 2β2 + 3β3 +
4β4 + 3β5 + 2β6 + β7 is an isotropic vector. We have r · β9 = 2 and
r · βi = 0, i 6= 9. The Coxeter graph of the full 2-reflection group of
E2,4,6 is the following:
β1
•
β2
•
β3
•
β4
•
β5
•
β6
•
β7
•
β8
•
β9
•
r
•
•
β0
Since Ref2(E2,4,6) is of finite index in O(E2,4,6), and since E2,4,6 is of
finite index in E10, it is of finite index in W (E10). In particular, the 2-
level congruence subgroup of Ref2(E2,4,6)(2) is of finite index in W (E10).
If we choose an isomorphism RS → E2,4,6 such that r represents the
class of a (−2)-curve, then the image of W n
S is a normal subgroup of
Ref2(E2,4,6)(2) and the quotient is isomorphic to the 2-level subgroup
of W2,4,6.
+
If S admits a K3-cover, then Nikulin's r-invariant ∆S
consists of one
element. The set ∆+
S consists of vectors of norm −2 in the unique coset
in Num(S) that contains a (−2)-curve. If k = C, applying Nikulin's
Theorem 6, we obtain, that, up to a finite group, Aut(S) is isomorphic
to W2,4,6.
ENRIQUES SURFACES
25
The next theorem gives a much more precise result about the struc-
ture of the group of automorphisms of a general nodal Enriques surface.
Since RS has discriminant group isomorphic to (Z/2Z)2, its reduction
modulo 2RS is a quadratic vector space. with 2-dimensional radical.
The radical is generated by the cosets of r and β0 + β1 + β3. and its
orthogonal group is isomorphic to G = 28 ⋊ Sp(8, F2). It is known that
the homomorphism W (RS) → G is surjective [15], [35]. Let W (RS)(2)′
be equal to the pre-image of the subgroup 28. Obviously it contains
the 2-level congruence subgroup W (RS)(2) as a subgroup of index 28.
Theorem 7. Let S be a general nodal Enriques surface and ρ : Aut(S) →
W (RS) be its natural representation. Then the kernel of ρ is trivial, and
the image is equal to W (RS)(2)′.
Proof. Consider the following sublattices of E2,4,6.
• L1 = hβ0, . . . , β6i. It isomorphic to E7 and L⊥
1
• L2 = hβ0, β2, . . . , β7i. It is isomorphic to E7 and L⊥
2
∼= A1 ⊕ U.
∼= A1 ⊕
U(2).
• L3 = hβ0, β2, . . . , β8i. It is isomorphic to E8 and L⊥
3
A1(−1).
∼= A1 ⊕
Define the following involutions of T2,4,6:
• K = −idL1 ⊕ idL⊥
;
• G = (−idL2 ⊕ idL⊥
) ◦ sβ9;
• B = −idL3 ⊕ idL⊥
;
1
2
3
One proves in [19], again following A. Coble, that the minimal normal
subgroup hhB, Kii containing B, K coincides with W (RS)(2) and to-
gether with G, the three involutions K, B, G normally generate W (RS)(2)′.5
It remains to show that all of these involutions and their conjugate can
be realized by automorphisms of S.
The involution K is realized by the deck transformation of the double
cover S → C3 of a cubic surface C3 defined by a linear system 2E1 +
2E2 − R, where E1, E2 are half-fibers with E1 · E2 = 1 and R is a
smooth rational curve with R · E1 = R · E2 = 0. One can show that it
always exists.
The involution B is realized by the deck transformation of the double
cover S → D′ onto a degenerate 4-nodal quartic del Pezzo surface
defined by the linear system 4E1 + 2R, where E1 is a half-fiber and
R is a smooth rational curve with E1 · R = 1.
5The computational proof from [19] can now be replaced by a conceptual proof
due to D. Allcock (Congruence subgroups and Enriques surface automorphisms,
math.AG.arXiv:1601.00103).
26
IGOR V. DOLGACHEV
Finally, the involution G is realized by the double cover S → D
defined by the linear system 2E1 + 2E2 which we considered in the
previous discussion. Note that G ∈ W (E10)(2) but does not belong to
W (RS)(2).
(cid:3)
The letters B, G and K here stand for E. Bertini, C. Geiser and
S. Kantor. The K3-cover π : X → S of a general nodal Enriques
surface is birationally isomorphic to a quartic symmetroid Y . This
is a quartic surface in P3 with 10 nodes, its equation is given by the
determinant of a symmetric matrix with entries linear forms in the
projective coordinates. The surface X admits a birational map σ :
X → Y , so it is a minimal resolution of Y . Let Q1, . . . , Q10 be the
exceptional curves and H is the class of a pre-image of a plane section
of Y . For a general X, the Picard group of X is generated by H, Qi and
H ′ such that 2H ′ ∼ 3H −Q1−· · ·−Q10. The orthogonal complement of
the divisor class of 2H −Q1 −· · ·−Q10 is isomorphic to π∗(RS) ∼= RS(2).
The involutions K, B, and G are induced by a Cremona involution of
P3 that leave Y invariant. Let us describe them.
The Kantor involution is defined by the linear system Q of quartics
through the first 7 nodes p1, . . . , p7 of the symmetroid. This linear
system defines a degree 2 rational map P3 99K Σ ⊂ P6, where Σ is a
cone over the Veronese surface in P5. We consider the elliptic fibration
on the blow-up P3 of 7 points of P3 defined by the net of quadrics
It has the negation birational involution
through the seven points.
defined by the eighth base point.
If we take a quartic elliptic curve
E through p1, . . . , p7 passing through a point p, then a quartic surface
from the linear system Q that contains p intersects E at one more
point p′. This defines an involution on E, p 7→ p′. The set of fixed
points is the set of quartics from Q that has an eight node. Thus the
three remaining nodes of the symmetroid are fixed and this makes the
symmetroid invariant. Note that the birational Kantor involution of
P3 is an analog of the Bertini involution of the plane.
The other two involutions are dilated Bertini and Geiser involutions
of the plane. They extend these involutions to the three dimensional
space.
The classification of finite subgroups of Aut(S) is far from being com-
plete. We do not even know what is the list of possible automorphism
groups of an unnodal Enriques surface. However, we can mention the
following result (explained to me by Daniel Allcock).
Theorem 8. Let G be a finite non-trivial subgroup contained in WS(2).
Then it is a group of order 2, and all such subgroups are conjugate in
ENRIQUES SURFACES
27
WS. The quotient S/G is isomorphic to a 4-nodal quartic del Pezzo
surface.
Proof. We identify Num(S) with the lattice E10. Suppose G contains
an element σ of order 2. Then V = E10 ⊗ Q splits into the orthogonal
direct sum of eigensubspaces V+ and V− with eigenvalues 1 and −1.
For any x = x+ + x− ∈ E10, x+ ∈ V−+, x− ∈ V−, we have
σ(x) ± x = (x+ − x−) ± (x+ + x−) ∈ 2E10.
This implies 2x± ∈ 2E10, hence x± ∈ E10 and the lattice E10 splits
into the orthogonal sum of sublattices V+ ∩ E10 and V− ∩ E10. Since
E10 is unimodular, the sublattices must be unimodular. This gives
∼= E8 or U, respectively. Since σ = g∗
V+ ∩ E10
∼= U. Thus
leaves invariant an ample divisor, we must have V+ ∩ E10
σ = 1U + (−1)E8 and hence σ = g∗ for some deck transformation of
S → D.
∼= U or E8 and V− ∩ E10
Suppose G contains an element σ of odd order m. Then σm − 1 =
(σ − 1)(1 + σ + · · · + σm−1) = 0, hence, for any x 6∈ 2E10 which is not
σ-invariant, we have
x + σ(x) + · · · + σm−1(x) ≡ mx mod 2E10.
Since m is odd, this gives x ∈ 2E10, a contradiction.
Finally, we may assume that G contains an element of order 2k, k > 1.
Then it contains an element σ of order 4. Let M = Ker(σ2 + 1) ⊂ E10.
Since σ2 = −1E8 ⊕1U for some direct sum decomposition E10 = E8 ⊕U,
we obtain M ∼= E8. The equality (σ2 + 1)(σ(x)) = σ3(x) + σ(x) =
−(σ2 + 1)(x), implies that σ(M) = M. Consider M as a module over
the principal ideal domain R = Z[t]/(t2 + 1). Since M has no torsion,
it is isomorphic to R⊕4. This implies that there exists v, w ∈ M such
that σ(v) = w and σ(w) = −v. However, this obviously contradicts our
assumption that σ ∈ W (E10)(2).
(cid:3)
Over C one can use the coarse moduli space of Enriques surfaces to
show that a general (resp. general nodal) Enriques surface has auto-
morphism group isomorphic to W (E10)(2) (resp. W2,4,6(2)′). I believe
that the same is true in any characteristic but I cannot prove it (except
in the case of µ2-surfaces or general unnodal surface if p 6= 2).
In any case if p 6= 2, the image of the automorphism group Aut(S)
in W (E10) is not the whole group. This is because W (E10) contains
a subgroup isomorphic to W (E8) and the known information about
finite groups of automorphisms of K3-surfaces shows that the order of
this group is too large to be realized as an automorphism group of a
K3-surface and hence of an Enriques surface.
28
IGOR V. DOLGACHEV
When the root invariant of an Enriques surface becomes large, the
automorphism group may become a finite group. The first example of
an Enriques surface with a finite automorphism group isomorphic to
S4 belongs to G. Fano [34]. However, I failed to understand Fano's
proof. An example of an Enriques surface with automorphism group
isomorphic to the dihedral group D4 of order 8 was given in my paper
[21]. At that time I did not know about Fano's example. Later on
all complex Enriques surfaces with finite automorphism groups were
classified by Nikulin [52] (in terms of their root invariant RS and by S.
Kond¯o [39] by explicit construction). There are seven classes of such
surfaces with automorphisms groups
D4, S4, 24 ⋊ D4, 22 ⋊ (Z/4Z ⋉ Z/5Z), Z/2Z ⋊ S4, S5, S5.
Their Nikulin R-invariants are, respectively,
(E8 ⊕ A1, {0}), (D9, {0}), (D8 ⊕ A⊕2
1 , Z/2Z),
(D5 ⊕ D5, Z/2Z), (E7 ⊕ A2 ⊕ A1, Z/2Z), (E6 ⊕ A4, {0}), (A9 ⊕ A1, {0}).
Note that Kond¯o's classification works in any characteristic 6= 2 and
there are more examples in characteristic 2 (see [26]).
We refer to the latest works in progress of H. Ito, S. Mukai and
H.Ohashi on the classification of finite groups of automorphisms of
complex Enriques surfaces [48], [49], [50], [37]. Note, that, via equi-
variant lifting an Enriques surface to characteristic 0, the classification
is the same in all characteristics except when p = 2 and S is an µ2 or
an α2-surface (see [26], Theorem 2). Another remark is that any finite
subgroup of W (E10) is conjugate to a subgroup of W (R), where R is a
negative root lattice corresponding to some subdiagram of the Dynkin
diagram of the root basis α0, . . . , α9 [12], Chapter V, §4, Exercise 2.
The types of maximal subdiagrams with this property are
D9, A1+A8, A1+A2+A6, A4+A5, D5+A4, E6+A3, E7+A2, E8+A1, A9.
This implies that the image of a finite subgroup G of Aut(S) in W (E10)
is isomorphic to a subgroup of W (R), where R is one of the above root
systems.
To conclude our survey let me refer to my earlier surveys of the
subject [23], [24]. Sadly, many of the problems of the theory discussed
in these surveys remain unsolved.
References
[1] M. Artin, On Enriques's surfaces, Thesis (Ph.D.)Harvard University. 1960.
[2] B.G. Averbuch, Enriques surfaces, Chapter X in Algebraic surfaces. Trudy
Mat. Inst. Steklov. 75, 1965. [Engl. Transl.: Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 75,
1965].
ENRIQUES SURFACES
29
[3] B.G. Averbuch, On the special types of Kummer and Enriques surfaces. Izv.
Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 29 (1965), 1095–1118.
[4] W. Barth, C. Peters, Automorphisms of Enriques surfaces, Inv. Math., 73
(1983), 383–411.
[5] W. Barth, Lectures on K3-and Enriques surfaces, in "Algebraic geometry.
Sitges 1983", Lecture Notes in Math., 1124, Springer, Berlin, 1985.
[6] W. Barth, K. Hulek, Ch. Klaus, A. Van de Ven, Compact complex surfaces.
Second edition. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004.
[7] W. Barth, Lectures on K3-and Enriques surfaces, in "Algebraic geometry.
Sitges 1983", Lect. Notes in Math. vol. 1124, Springer-Verlag, 1985, pp. 21–
57.
[8] A. Beauville, Surfaces alg´ebriques complexes, Ast´erisque. vol. 54, Soc. Mat.
de France. 1980 [Engl. Transl.: Complex algebraic surfaces, London Math.
Soc. Lecture Notes. vol. 68, Cambridge Univ. Press. 1983].
[9] A. Beauville, On the Brauer group of Enriques surfaces. Math. Res. Lett. 16
(2009), 927-934.
[10] E. Bombieri, D. Mumford, Enriques classification in char. p, II, Complex
Analysis and Algebraic Geometry, Iwanami-Shoten, Tokyo. 1977, 23–42.
[11] E. Bombieri, D. Mumford, Enriques classification in char. p, III, Invent.
Math. 35 (1976), 197–232.
[12] N. Bourbaki, Lie groups and Lie algebras. Chapters 4–6. Translated from the
1968 French original by Andrew Pressley. Elements of Mathematics. Springer-
Verlag, Berlin, 2002.
[13] G. Casnati, The moduli space of Enriques surfaces with a polarization of
degree 4 is rational. Geom. Dedicata 106 (2004), 185-194.
[14] G. Castelnuovo, Sulle superficie di genere zero, Mem. delle Soc. Ital. delle
Scienze, ser. III, 10 (1895), 103–123
[15] A. Coble, Theta Modular Groups Determined by Point Sets. Amer. J. Math.
40 (1918), 317-340.
[16] F. Cossec, I. Dolgachev, On automorphisms of nodal Enriques surfaces. Bull.
Amer. Math. Soc. 12 (1985), 247-249.
[17] F. Cossec, I. Dolgachev, Rational curves on Enriques surfaces, Math. Ann.
272 (1985), 369–384.
[18] F. Cossec, Reye congruences, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 280 (1983),737–751.
[19] F. Cossec, I. Dolgachev, Enriques surfaces. I. Progress in Mathematics, 76.
Birkhauser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1989.
[20] F. Cossec, I. Dolgachev, C. Liedtke, Enriques surfaces, in preparation.
[21] I. Dolgachev, On automorphisms of Enriques surfaces. Invent. Math. 76
(1984), 163–177
[22] I. Dolgachev, D. Ortland, Point sets in projective spaces and theta functions.
Ast´erisque No. 165 (1988), 210 pp.
[23] I. Dolgachev, Enriques surfaces: what is left?, Problems in the theory of sur-
faces and their classification (Cortona, 1988), 81-97, Sympos. Math., XXXII,
Academic Press, London, 1991
[24] I. Dolgachev, Enriques surfaces: old and new. Geometry and complex vari-
ables (Bologna, 1988/1990), 165-176, Lecture Notes in Pure and Appl. Math.,
132, Dekker, New York, 1991
30
IGOR V. DOLGACHEV
[25] I. Dolgachev, Mirror symmetry for lattice polarized K3 surfaces. J. Math. Sci.
81 (1996), 2599-2630.
[26] I. Dolgachev, Numerical automorphisms of Enriques surfaces in arbitrary
characteristic, Arithmetic and geometry of K3 surfaces and Calabi-Yau three-
fold, ed. R. Lazu, M. Schutt, N. Yui, Fields Institute Communications, vol.
67, Springer. 2013, pp.267–284.
[27] I. Dolgachev, Reflection groups in algebraic geometry. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.
45 (2008), 1-60.
[28] I. Dolgachev, Classical algebraic geometry. A modern view. Cambridge Uni-
versity Press, Cambridge, 2012.
[29] I. Dolgachev, D. Markushevich, Lagrangian tens of planes, Enriques surfaces
and holomorphic symplectic fourfolds, in preparation.
[30] T. Ekedahl, N. Shepherd-Barron, On exceptional Enriques
surfaces.
math.AG. arXiv:0405510.
[31] F. Enriques, Introduzione alla geometria sopra le superficie algebriche, Mem.
Soc. Ital. delle Scienze, 10 (1896), 1–81.
[32] F. Enriques, Sopra le superficie algebriche di bigenere uno, Mem. Soc. Ital.
delle Scienze, ser. 3a, 14 (1906), 327–352.
[33] G. Fano, Superficie algebriche di genere zero e bigenere uno e loro case par-
ticolari, Rendiconti Mat. di Palermo, 29 (1910), 98–118.
[34] G. Fano, Superficie regolari di genere zero e bigenere uno, Revista de matem-
atica y fisica Teoretica Univ. de Tucuman Argentina, 4 (1944), 69–79.
[35] R. Griess, Quotients of infinite reflection groups. Math. Ann. 263 (1983),
267-278.
[36] L. Illusie, Complexe de De Rham-Witt et cohomologie crystalline. Ann. Sci.
´Ec. Norm. Sup, 4e ser., 12 (1979), 501–661.
[37] H. Ito, H. Ohashi, Classification of
involutions on Enriques surfaces.
math.AG. arXiv:1302.2316.
[38] Y. Kim, Normal quintic Enriques surfaces. J. Korean Math. Soc. 36 (1999),
no. 3, 545566.
[39] S. Kond¯o, Enriques surfaces with finite automorphism groups. Japan. J. Math.
(N.S.) 12 (1986), 191-282.
[40] S. Kond¯o, The rationality of the moduli space of Enriques surfaces. Compo-
sitio Math. 91 (1994), 159–173.
[41] S. Kond¯o, K3 and Enriques surfaces, Arithmetic and geometry of K3 surfaces
and Calabi-Yau threefold, ed. R. Lazu, M. Schutt, N. Yui, Fields Institute
Communications, vol. 67, Springer. 2013, pp.3–28.
[42] W. Lang, Two theorems on the De Rham cohomology, Comp. Math. 40
(1980), 417–423.
[43] M. Lieblich, D. Maulik, A note on the cone conjecture for K3 surfaces in
positive characteristic, arXiv:1102.3377.
[44] C. Liedtke, Arithmetic moduli and lifting of Enriques surfaces. J. Reine
Angew. Math. 706 (2015), 35–65.
[45] H. Matsumura, F. Oort, Representability of group functors, and automor-
phisms of algebraic schemes. Invent. Math. 4 (1967), 1–25.
[46] S. Mukai, Y. Namikawa, Automorphisms of Enriques surfaces which act triv-
ially on the cohomology groups. Invent. Math. 77 (1984), 383-397.
ENRIQUES SURFACES
31
[47] S. Mukai, Numerically trivial involutions of Kummer type of an Enriques
surface. Kyoto J. Math. 50 (2010), 889-902.
[48] S. Mukai, Kummer's quartics and numerically reflective involutions of En-
riques surfaces. J. Math. Soc. Japan 64 (2012), 231-246.
[49] S. Mukai, Lecture notes on K3 and Enriques surfaces. Contributions to al-
gebraic geometry, 389-405, EMS Ser. Congr. Rep., Eur. Math. Soc., Zrich,
2012.
[50] S. Mukai, H. Ohashi, Enriques surfaces of Hutchinson-Gopel type and Math-
ieu automorphisms, Arithmetic and geometry of K3 surfaces and Calabi-Yau
threefold, ed. R. Lazu, M. Schutt, N. Yui, Fields Institute Communications,
vol. 67, Springer. 2013, pp. 429–453.
[51] D. Mumford, J. Fogarty, F. Kirwan, Geometric invariant theory. Third edi-
tion. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (2) [Results in Math-
ematics and Related Areas (2)], 34. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994.
[52] V. Nikulin, On the quotient groups of the automorphism groups of hyperbolic
forms modulo subgroups generated by 2-reflections, Algebraic geometric appli-
cations, Current Problems of Mathematics, t. 18, VINITI, Moscow, 1981, pp.
3–114 [Engl. Transl.: J. Soviet Math. 22 (1983), 1401–1476].
[53] V. Nikulin, Description of automorphism groups of Enriques surfaces. Dokl.
Akad. Nauk SSSR 277 (1984), 1324-1327. [Engl. transl.: Soviet Math. Dokl.
30 (1984), 282–285].
[54] E. Stagnaro, Constructing Enriques surfaces from quintics in P 3
k , Algebraic
Geometry-Open Problems, Lect. Notes in Math. vol. 997, Springer-Verlag,
1983, pp. 400–403.
[55] Y. Umezu, Normal quintic surfaces which are birationally Enriques surfaces.
Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 33 (1997), no. 3, 359–384.
[56] A. Verra, On Enriques surfaces as a fourfold cover of P 2, Math. Anal. 266
(1983), 241–250.
[57] A. Verra, A short proof of the unirationality of A5. Nederl. Akad. Wetensch.
Indag. Math. 46 (1984), 339–355.
Department of Mathematics, University of Michigan, 525 E. Univer-
sity Av., Ann Arbor, Mi, 49109, USA
E-mail address: [email protected]
|
1310.6705 | 2 | 1310 | 2013-10-25T19:57:20 | Universal unramified cohomology of cubic fourfolds containing a plane | [
"math.AG"
] | We prove the universal triviality of the third unramified cohomology group of a very general complex cubic fourfold containing a plane. The proof uses results on the unramified cohomology of quadrics due to Kahn, Rost, and Sujatha. | math.AG | math |
UNIVERSAL UNRAMIFIED COHOMOLOGY OF CUBIC
FOURFOLDS CONTAINING A PLANE
ASHER AUEL, JEAN-LOUIS COLLIOT-TH ´EL `ENE, R. PARIMALA
Abstract. We prove the universal triviality of the third unramified cohomology
group of a very general complex cubic fourfold containing a plane. The proof
uses results on the unramified cohomology of quadrics due to Kahn, Rost, and
Sujatha.
Introduction
Let X be a smooth cubic fourfold, i.e., a smooth cubic hypersurface in P5 . A well
known problem in algebraic geometry concerns the rationality of X over C.
Expectation. The very general cubic fourfold over C is irrational.
Here, “very general” is usually taken to mean “in the complement of a countable
union of proper Zariski closed subsets” in the moduli space of cubic fourfolds. At
present, however, not a single cubic fourfold is provably irrational, though many
families of rational cubic fourfolds are known.
If X contains a plane P (i.e., a linear two dimensional subvariety of P5 ), then X
is birational to the total space of a quadric surface bundle eX → P2 by pro jecting
from P . Its discriminant divisor D ⊂ P2 is a sextic curve. The rationality of a cubic
fourfold containing a plane over C is also a well known problem.
Expectation. The very general cubic fourfold containing a plane over C is irra-
tional.
Assuming that the discriminant divisor D is smooth, the discriminant double
cover S → P2 branched along D is then a K3 surface of degree 2 and the even Clifford
algebra of the quadric fibration eX → P2 gives rise to a Brauer class β ∈ Br(S ), called
the Clifford invariant of X . This invariant does not depend on the choice of P (if β
is not zero, the plane P is actually the unique plane contained in X ). By classical
results in the theory of quadratic forms (e.g., [40, Thm. 6.3]), β is trivial if and only
if the quadric surface bundle eX → P2 has a rational section. Thus if β is trivial
then X is rational (see [34, Thm. 3.1]), though it may happen that X is rational
even when β is not trivial (see [4, Thm. 11]).
Some families of rational cubic fourfolds have been described by Fano [29], Tregub
[51], [52], and Beauville–Donagi [8]. In particular, pfaffian cubic fourfolds, defined
by pfaffians of skew-symmetric 6 × 6 matrices of linear forms, are rational. Hassett
[33] describes, via lattice theory, Noether–Lefschetz divisors Cd in the moduli space
C of cubic fourfolds. In particular, C14 is the closure of the locus of pfaffian cubic
fourfolds and C8 is the locus of cubic fourfolds containing a plane. Hassett [34]
identifies countably many divisors of C8—the union of which is Zariski dense in
C8—consisting of rational cubic fourfolds with trivial Clifford invariant.
1
2
AUEL, COLLIOT-TH ´EL `ENE, PARIMALA
A natural class of birational invariants arise from unramified cohomology groups.
The unramified cohomology of a rational variety is trivial (i.e., reduces to the co-
homology of the ground field), cf. [18, Thm. 1.5] and [17, §2 and Thm. 4.1.5]. Such
invariants have been known to provide useful obstructions to rationality.
For a smooth cubic fourfold X over C, the unramified cohomology groups
H i
nr(X/C, Q/Z(i − 1))
vanish for 0 ≤ i ≤ 3, see Theorem 2.4. The case i = 1 follows from the Kummer
sequence (see Theorem 2.4). For i = 2, one appeals to the Leray spectral sequence
and a version of the Lefschetz hyperplane theorem due to M. Noether, as in [45,
Thm. A.1]. For i = 3, the proof relies on the integral Hodge conjecture for cycles of
codimension 2 on smooth cubic fourfolds, a result proved by Voisin [56, Thm. 18]
building on [44] and [58].
Something stronger is known when i ≤ 2, namely that for any field extension F /C,
the natural map H i (F , Q/Z(i − 1)) → H i
nr (XF /F , Q/Z(i − 1)) is an isomorphism,
see Theorem 2.4. In this case, we say that the unramified cohomology is universally
trivial. The universal behavior of an unramified cohomology group can lead to a
finer obstruction to rationality. While we do not know if the unramified cohomology
of an arbitrary smooth cubic fourfold over C is universally trivial in degree 3, our
main result is the following.
Theorem 1. Let X ⊂ P5 be a very general cubic fourfold containing a plane over C.
Then H 3
nr(X/C, Q/Z(2)) is universal ly trivial, i.e., the natural map H 3 (F , Q/Z(2)) →
H 3
nr(XF /F , Q/Z(2)) is an isomorphism for every field extension F /C.
Here, “very general” means that the quadric surface bundle eX → P2 attached
to the plane P ⊂ X has simple degeneration (see Proposition 4.1) and that the
associated K3 surface r : S → P2 of degree 2 satisfies r∗ : Pic(P2 ) → Pic(S ) is an
isomorphism. A very general cubic fourfold containing a plane has nontrivial Clifford
invariant. Theorem 1 implies the corresponding statement with µ⊗2
coefficients as
2
well (see Corollary 5.6).
This article is organized as follows. In §1, we expand on the notion of universal
triviality and, more generally, universal torsion by a positive integer, of the Chow
group A0 (X ) of zero-cycles of degree zero on a smooth proper variety X . We state
an extension of a theorem of Merkurjev [43, Thm. 2.11] on the relationship between
universal torsion properties of A0 (X ) and analogous properties for unramified co-
homology groups and, more generally, unramified classes in cycle modules. We also
recall that rationally connected varieties, and among them Fano varieties, satisfy
such a universal torsion property for A0 (X ).
In §2, we discuss the specific case of cubic hypersurfaces X ⊂ Pn+1 for n ≥ 2.
Already in this case, the universal triviality is an open question. We register a
folklore proof that A0 (X ) is killed by 18, and by 2 as soon as X contains a k-line.
In particular, for any smooth cubic hypersurface X ⊂ Pn+1 over C, with n ≥ 2,
and any field extension F /C, the group A0 (XF ) is 2-torsion, which also follows from
the existence of a unirational parameterization of X of degree 2. The only possible
interesting unramified cohomology groups are thus those with coefficients Z/2Z.
We recall the known results on these groups. Our main result, Theorem 1, then
appears as one step beyond what was known, but still leaving open the question of
the universal triviality of A0 (X ).
UNIVERSAL UNRAMIFIED COHOMOLOGY OF CUBIC FOURFOLDS
3
In §3, we recall some results on the unramified cohomology groups of quadrics
in degrees at most 3. The most important is due to Kahn, Rost, and Sujatha (see
Theorem 3.3), who build upon earlier work of Merkurjev, Suslin, and Rost.
In §4, we discuss the fibration into 2-dimensional quadrics over the pro jective
plane, as well as its corresponding even Clifford algebra, associated to a smooth
cubic fourfold containing a given plane.
In §5, we use the results of the previous two sections to prove Theorem 1. The
“very general” hypothesis allows us to construct well-behaved parameters at the
local rings of curves on P2 that split in S (see Lemma 5.3).
We thank the American Institute of Mathematics for sponsoring the workshop
“Brauer groups and obstruction problems: moduli spaces and arithmetic” held Feb-
ruary 25 to March 1, 2013, in Palo Alto, California. This work emerges from a
problem session group formed during the workshop, and involved the participation
of Marcello Bernardara, Jodi Black, Evangelia Gazaki, Andrew Kresch, Eric Riedl,
Olivier Wittenberg, and Matthew Woolf. We thank Andrew Kresch for further
discussions after the AIM meeting.
The first author is partially supported by National Science Foundation grant
MSPRF DMS-0903039 and by an NSA Young Investigator grant. The third author
is partially supported by National Science Foundation grant DMS-1001872.
1. Unramified cohomology and Chow group of 0-cycles
1.1. Unramified elements. A general framework for the notion of “unramified
element” is established in [17, §2]. Let k be a field and denote by Localk the category
of local k-algebras together with local k-algebra homomorphisms. Let Ab be the
category of abelian groups and let M : Localk → Ab be a functor. For any field K/k
the group of unramified elements of M in K/k is the intersection
Mnr (K/k) = \k⊂O⊂K
im(cid:0)M (O ) → M (K )(cid:1)
over all rank 1 discrete valuations rings k ⊂ O ⊂ K with Frac(O ) = K .
There is a natural map M (k) → Mnr (K/k) and we say that the group of unram-
ified elements Mnr (K/k) is trivial if this map is surjective.
For X an integral scheme of finite type over a field k , in this paper we write
Mnr (X/k) := Mnr (k(X )/k). By this definition, the group Mnr (X/k) is a k-birational
invariant of integral schemes of finite type over k . We will be mostly concerned with
´et (−, µ) with coefficients µ either µ⊗(i−1)
the functor M = H i
(under the assumption
2
char(k) 6= 2) or
Q/Z(i − 1) := lim−→ µ⊗(i−1)
m
the limit being taken over all integers m coprime to the characteristic of k . In this
case, Mnr (X/k) is called the unramified cohomology group H i
nr (X, µ) of X with
coefficients in µ.
,
Theorem 1.1. Let k be a field of characteristic different from a prime p. The
natural map
is injective.
H i (F , µ⊗(i−1)
p
) → H i (F , Q/Z(i − 1))
4
AUEL, COLLIOT-TH ´EL `ENE, PARIMALA
This is a well known consequence of the norm residue isomorphism theorem (pre-
viously known as the Bloch–Kato conjecture) in degree i − 1. We use this only
for i = 3, in which case it is a consequence of the Merkurjev–Suslin theorem. For
i = 3, p = 2, this is a theorem of Merkurjev.
If F /k is a field extension, we write XF = X ×k F . If X is geometrically integral
over k , we say that Mnr (X/k) is universally trivial if Mnr (XF /F ) is trivial for every
field extension F /k .
Proposition 1.2 ([17, §2 and Thm. 4.1.5]). Let M : Localk → Ab be a functor
satisfying the fol lowing conditions:
• If O is a discrete valuation ring containing k, with fraction field K and residue
field κ, then ker(cid:0)M (O ) → M (K )(cid:1) ⊂ ker(cid:0)M (O ) → M (κ)(cid:1).
• If A is a regular local ring of dimension 2 containing k, with fraction field K ,
then im(cid:0)M (A) → M (K )(cid:1) = Tht(p)=1 im(cid:0)M (Ap ) → M (K )(cid:1).
• The group Mnr (A1
k /k) is universal ly trivial.
Then Mnr (Pn
k /k) is universal ly trivial.
The functor H i
´et (−, µ) satisfies the conditions of Proposition 1.2 (cf. [17, Thm. 4.1.5]),
hence if X is a k-rational variety, then H i
nr (X/k , µ) is universally trivial.
Denote by Ab• the category of graded abelian groups. An important class of
functors M : Localk → Ab• arise from the cycle-modules of Rost [48, Rem. 5.2]. In
particular, unramified cohomology arises from a cycle-module. A cycle module M
comes equipped with residue maps of graded degree −1
∂−→ Mx∈X (1)
M i (k(X ))
M i−1 (k(x))
for any integral k-variety X . If X is smooth and proper, then the kernel is M i
nr (X/k).
1.2. Chow groups of 0-cycles. Denote by CHd (X ) the Chow group of d-cycles
on a smooth variety X over a field k up to rational equivalence.
If X is proper
over k , then there is a well-defined degree map CH0 (X ) → Z, and we denote by
A0 (X ) its kernel, called the Chow group of 0-cycles of degree 0. The group A0 (X )
is a k-birational invariant of smooth, proper, integral varieties over a field k , see
[21, Prop. 6.3] requiring resolution of singularities and [30, Ex. 16.1.11] in general.
The computation of the Chow groups of pro jective space goes back to Severi. For
0-cycles, one easily sees A0 (Pn
k ) = 0.
For X a proper k-variety, we say that A0 (X ) is universally trivial if A0 (XF ) = 0
for every field extension F /k . To check triviality of A0 (XF ) over every field extension
F /k seems like quite a burden. However, usually it suffices to check it over the
function field by the following well known lemma.
Lemma 1.3. Let X be a geometrical ly irreducible smooth proper variety over a field
k. Assume that X has a 0-cycle of degree 1. The group A0 (X ) is universal ly trivial
if and only if A0 (Xk(X ) ) = 0.
Proof. If A0 (X ) is universally trivial then A0 (Xk(X ) ) = 0 by definition. Let us
prove the converse. Write d = dim(X ). Let ξ ∈ Xk(X ) be the k(X )-rational point
which is the image of the “diagonal morphism” Spec k(X ) → X ×k Spec k(X ). Let
P be a fixed 0-cycle of degree 1 on X . By hypothesis, we have ξ = Pk(X ) in
CH0 (Xk(X ) ). The closures of Pk(X ) and ξ in X ×k X are P ×k X and the diagonal
UNIVERSAL UNRAMIFIED COHOMOLOGY OF CUBIC FOURFOLDS
5
∆X , respectively. By the closure in X ×k X of a 0-cycle on Xk(X ) , we mean the sum,
taken with multiplicity, of the closures of each closed point in the support of the 0-
cycle on Xk(X ) . Hence the class of ∆X − P ×k X is in the kernel of the contravariant
map CHd (X ×k X ) → CHd (Xk(X ) ). Since CHd (Xk(X ) ) is the inductive limit of
CHd (X ×k U ) over all dense open subvarieties U of X , we have that ∆X − P ×k X
vanishes in some CHd (X ×k U ). We thus have a decomposition of the diagonal
∆X = P ×k X + Z
(1)
in CHd (X ×k X ), where Z is a cycle with support in X × V for some proper closed
subvariety V ⊂ X .
Now, each d-cycle T on X ×k X induces a homomorphism T∗ : CH0 (X ) → CH0 (X )
defined by T∗ (z ) = (p1 )∗ (T .p∗2z ), where pi : X ×k X → X are the two pro jections.
The map T 7→ T∗ is itself a homomorphism
CHd (X ×k X ) = CHd (X ×k X ) → HomZ (CH0 (X ), CH0 (X ))
by [30, Cor. 16.1.2]. We note that (∆X )∗ is the identity map and (P ×k X )∗ (z ) =
deg(z )P . By the easy moving lemma for 0-cycles on a smooth variety (cf. [19,
p. 599]), for a proper closed subvariety V ⊂ X , every 0-cycle on X is rationally
equivalent to one with support away from V . This implies that Z∗ = 0 for any
d-cycle with support on X ×k V for a proper closed subvariety V ⊂ X . Thus if
A0 (Xk(X ) ) = 0, then by the decomposition of the diagonal (1), we see that the
identity map restricted to A0 (X ) is zero.
For any field extension F /k , we have the base-change ∆XF = PF ×F XF + ZF
of the decomposition of the diagonal (1), hence the same argument as above shows
that A0 (XF ) = 0. We conclude that A0 (X ) is universally trivial.
(cid:3)
Let M be a cycle module and let X be a smooth, proper, geometrically connected
variety over the field k . Let N be a positive integer. We say that Mnr (X/k) is
universally N -torsion if the cokernel of the natural map M (F ) → Mnr (XF /F ) is
killed by N for every field extension F /k . We say that A0 (X ) is universally N -
torsion if A0 (XF ) is killed by N for every field extension F /k .
The index i(X ) of a variety X is the smallest positive degree of a 0-cycle.
Theorem 1.4. Let X be a smooth proper geometrical ly connected variety over a
field k. Let N > 0 be an integer. If the Chow group A0 (X ) of 0-cycles of degree 0 is
universal ly N -torsion then for every cycle module M over k, the group Mnr (X/k)
is universal ly i(X )N -torsion.
Proof. This is a direct consequence of Lemma 1.3 and [37, Prop. RC.8].
(cid:3)
The case N = 1 is a generalization of a theorem of Merkurjev [43, Thm. 2.11], who
also establishes a converse statement. For any N > 0, one may extend Merkurjev’s
method to prove a weak converse: if Mnr (X/k) is universally N -torsion for every
cycle module M then A0 (X ) is also universally N -torsion.
We point out that the appearance of the index of X , in the statement of Theo-
rem 1.4, is necessary. For any quadric X over any field k of characteristic 6= 2, we
have that A0 (X ) is universally trivial (see [50]). However, if X is the 4-dimensional
quadric associated to an anisotropic Albert form X over a field k of characteristic
nr (X/k , Q/Z(2))(cid:1) ∼= Z/2Z by [36, Thm. 5].
6= 2, then coker(cid:0)H 3 (F , Q/Z(2)) → H 3
6
AUEL, COLLIOT-TH ´EL `ENE, PARIMALA
Hence A0 (X ) is universally trivial, while there are nontrivial unramified elements of
some cycle module over X . Note that the index of an anisotropic quadric is 2.
The following lemmas will be used in the next section.
Lemma 1.5. Let X be a proper variety over a field k with X (k) 6= ∅. Let N > 0
be an integer. If for every finite extension K/k and any two K -points P , Q ∈ X (K )
the class of the 0-cycle P − Q is N -torsion in A0 (XK ), then A0 (X ) is N -torsion.
Proof. Fixing P ∈ X (k), any element of A0 (X ) can be written as a linear combina-
tion of 0-cycles of degree 0 of the form Z − deg(Z )P , where Z is a closed point of
X . Let K be the residue field of Z . Consider the morphism f : XK → X . Since
K ⊗k K has K as a direct factor, there is a corresponding K -rational point ζ of
XK lying over Z , such that f∗ζ = P . By hypothesis ζ − PK is N -torsion, hence
f∗ (ζ − PK ) = Z − deg(Z )P is N -torsion.
(cid:3)
Lemma 1.6. Let k be an algebraical ly closed field and K/k a field extension. Let X
be a smooth projective connected variety over k. Then the natural map CH0 (X ) →
CH0 (XK ) is injective.
Proof. Let z be a 0-cycle on X that becomes rationally equivalent to zero on XK .
Then there exists a subextension L of K/k that is finitely generated over k , such
that z becomes rationally equivalent to zero on XL .
In fact, we can spread out
the rational equivalence to a finitely generated k-algebra A. Since k is algebraically
closed, there are many k-points on Spec A, at which we can specialize the rational
equivalence.
(cid:3)
Lemma 1.7. Let X be a smooth proper connected variety over an algebraical ly
closed field k of infinite transcendence degree over its prime field. If A0 (X ) = 0
then there exists an integer N > 0 such that A0 (X ) is universal ly N -torsion.
Proof. The variety X is defined over an algebraically closed subfield L ⊂ k , with
L algebraic over a field finitely generated over its prime field. That is, there exists
a variety X0 over L with X ∼= X0 ×L k . Let η be the generic point of X0 . Let P
be an L-point of X0 . One may embed the function field F = L(X0 ) into k , by the
transcendence degree hypothesis on k . Let K be the algebraic closure of F inside k .
By Lemma 1.6 and the hypothesis that A0 (X ) = 0, we have that A0 (X0 ×L F ) = 0.
This implies that there is a finite extension E /F of fields such that ηE − PE = 0
in A0 (X0 ⊗L E ). Taking the corestriction to F , one finds that N (ηF − PF ) = 0 in
A0 (X0 ×L F ), hence in A0 (X ) as well. Arguing as in the proof of Lemma 1.3, we
conclude that A0 (X ) is universally N -torsion.
(cid:3)
1.3. Connections with complex geometry. The universal torsion of A0 (X ) puts
strong restrictions on the variety X . For example, the following result is well known.
Proposition 1.8. Let X be a smooth proper geometrical ly irreducible variety over
a field k of characteristic zero. If A0 (X ) is universal ly N -torsion for some positive
integer N then, H 0 (X, Ωi
X ) = 0 and H i (X, OX ) = 0 for al l i ≥ 1.
Proof. Over a complex surface, the result goes back to Bloch [9, App. Lec. 1],
by exploiting a decomposition of the diagonal and the action of cycles on various
cohomology theories. Aspects of this argument were developed in [12]. A proof over
UNIVERSAL UNRAMIFIED COHOMOLOGY OF CUBIC FOURFOLDS
7
the complex numbers can be found in [55, Cor. 10.18, §10.2.2]. Over a general field
of characteristic zero, the argument is sketched in [28, p. 187].
(cid:3)
Over C, the universal triviality of A0 (X ) does not imply H 0 (X, ω⊗n
X ) = 0 for
all n > 1. Otherwise, a surface over C with A0 (X ) = 0 would additionally satisfy
P2 (X ) = h0 (X, ω⊗2
X ) = 0, hence would be rational by Castelnovo’s criterion.
It is however well known that there exist nonrational complex surfaces X , with
pg (X ) = q(X ) = 0 and for which A0 (X ) = 0. Enriques surfaces were the first
examples, extensively studied in [26], [27, p. 294] with some examples considered
earlier in [47], see also [15]. For more examples, see [10]. We remark that for an
Enriques surface X , we have that H 1
nr(X/C, Z/2Z) = H 1
´et (X, Z/2Z) = Z/2Z. Hence
by Theorem 1.4, we see that A0 (X ) is not universally trivial.
The following result was stated without detailed proof as the last remark of [12].
As we show, it is an immediate consequence of a result in [22]. A more geometric
proof was recently shown to us by C. Voisin.
Proposition 1.9. Let X be a smooth proper connected surface over C. Suppose
that al l groups H i
Betti (X (C), Z) are torsionfree and that A0 (X ) = 0. Then A0 (X ) is
universal ly trivial.
Proof. By Lemma 1.7, we have that A0 (X ) is universally N -torsion. Hence by
Lemma 1.8, we have that H i (X, OX ) = 0 for all i ≥ 1. Hence pg (X ) = q(X ) = 0,
and thus b3 (X ) = b1 (X ) = 2q(X ) = 0. The torsion-free hypothesis on cohomology
finally allows us conclude, from [22, Thm. 3.10(d)], that A0 (XF ) = 0 for any field
extension F /C.
(cid:3)
Corollary 1.10. Let X be a smooth proper connected surface over C. Suppose that
the N´eron-Severi group NS(X ) of X is torsionfree and that A0 (X ) = 0. Then A0 (X )
is universal ly trivial.
Proof. The group H 1
Betti (X (C), Z) is clearly torsionfree. For any smooth proper
connected variety X over C of dimension d there is an isomorphism N S (X )tors ≃
Betti (X (C), Z)tors and H 2d−1
H 2
Betti (X (C), Z)tors , and the finite groups H 2
Betti (X (C), Z)tors
are dual to each other. The hypotheses thus imply that for the surface X , all groups
H i
Betti (X (C), Z) are torsionfree, and we apply Proposition 1.9.
(cid:3)
The first surfaces S of general type with pg (S ) = q(S ) = 0 were constructed in
[14] and [31]. Simply connected surfaces X of general type for which pg (X ) = 0
were constructed by Barlow [6], who also proved that A0 (X ) = 0 for some of them.
See also the recent paper [53]. For such surfaces, Pic(X ) = NS(X ) has no torsion,
thus Corollary 1.10 applies. The group A0 (X ) is universally trivial, but the surfaces
are far from being rational, since they are of general type.
A smooth pro jective variety X over a field k is called rationally chain connected
if for every algebraically closed field extension K/k , any two K -points of X can be
connected by a chain of rational curves. Smooth, geometrically unirational varieties
It is a theorem of Campana [13] and Koll´ar–Miyaoka–
are rationally connected.
Mori [41] that any smooth pro jective Fano variety is rationally chain connected. If
X is rationally chain connected, then A0 (XK ) = 0 for any algebraically closed field
extension K/k . While a standard argument then proves that A0 (XF ) is torsion for
8
AUEL, COLLIOT-TH ´EL `ENE, PARIMALA
every field extension F /k , the following more precise result, in the spirit of Lemma
1.7 above, is known.
Proposition 1.11 ([19, Prop. 11]). Let X be a smooth, projective, rational ly chain
connected variety over a field k. Then there exists an integer N > 0 such that A0 (X )
is universal ly N -torsion.
There exist rationally connected varieties X over an algebraically closed field of
characteristic zero with A0 (X ) not universally trivial. Indeed, let X be a unirational
nr (X, Q/Z(1)) ∼= Br(X ) 6= 0, see e.g., [2]. Then by Theorem 1.4,
threefold with H 2
A0 (X ) is not universally trivial.
We do not know whether there exist smooth Fano varieties over an algebraically
closed field of characteristic zero with A0 (X ) not universally trivial.
2. Chow groups of 0-cycles on cubic hypersurfaces
Now we will discuss the situation for cubic hypersurfaces X ⊂ Pn+1 with n ≥ 2.
Quite a few years ago, one of us learned the following argument from the Dean of
Trinity College, Cambridge.
Proposition 2.1. Let X ⊂ Pn+1
, with n ≥ 2, be an arbitrary cubic hypersurface
k
over an arbitrary field k. Then A0 (X ) is 18-torsion. If X (k) 6= ∅ then A0 (X ) is
6-torsion. If X contains a k-line, then A0 (X ) is 2-torsion.
Proof. Assuming the assertion in the case X (k) 6= ∅, we can deduce the general case
from a norm argument, noting that X acquires a rational point after an extension
of degree 3. So we assume that X (k) 6= ∅. By Lemma 1.5, to prove the general
statement over an arbitrary field k , it suffices to prove that for any distinct points
P , Q ∈ X (k), the class of the 0-cycle P − Q is 6-torsion, and that it is 2-torsion
k ⊂ Pn+1
if X contains a k-line. Choose a P3
containing P and Q. If X contains a
k
k is either P3
k-line L, take such a P3
k which contains the line L. Then X ∩ P3
k or is a
k . In the first case, P is rationally equivalent to Q on P3
cubic surface in P3
k , hence on
X . Thus we can assume, for the rest of the proof, that X ⊂ P3
k is a cubic surface,
possibly singular. We will sketch a route to prove the result, leaving the minute
details to the reader.
We first show that if the cubic surface X contains a k-line L, then for any two
distinct points P , Q ∈ X (k), we have 2(P − Q) = 0 ∈ A0 (X ). It is enough to prove
this when Q is a k-point on L. If P also lies on L, then P − Q = 0. If P does not lie
on L, let Π be the plane spanned by P and L. If it is contained in X , then clearly
P − Q = 0. If not, then it cuts out on X a cubic curve C , one component of which
is the line L, the other component is a conic. At this juncture, we leave it to the
reader to consider the various possible cases and show that 2(P − Q) is rationally
equivalent to zero on C , hence on X . The coefficient 2 is the degree of intersection
of the conic with the line.
We may now assume that the cubic surface X does not contain a k-line. If P and
Q were both singular, then the line through P and Q would intersect the surface
with multiplicity at least 4, hence would be contained in X , which is excluded. We
may thus assume that P is a regular k-point. First assume that Q is singular. Let
Π be a plane which contains P and Q. It is not contained in X . Its trace on X is
a cubic curve C in the plane Π, such that C is singular at Q. A discussion of cases
UNIVERSAL UNRAMIFIED COHOMOLOGY OF CUBIC FOURFOLDS
9
then shows that 6(Q − P ) = 0 on C , hence on X (the occurence of 6 rather than 2,
comes from allowing nonperfect fields in characteristic 3). Now suppose that both
P and Q are regular, hence smooth, k-points. Let TP ⊂ P3
k be the tangent plane to
X at P , and TQ ⊂ P3
k the tangent plane to X at Q. Since X contains no k-line, the
tangent planes are distinct. Let L = TP ∩ TQ be their intersection. This line is not
contained in X , which it intersects in a zero-cycle z of degree 3 over k . The trace of
X on the plane TP is a cubic curve CP which is singular at P and contains the 0-cycle
z . We leave it to the reader to check that 6P − 2z = 0 ∈ A0 (CP ), hence in A0 (X ).
Similarly, 6Q − 2z = 0 ∈ A0 (CQ ), hence in A0 (X ). Thus 6(P − Q) = 0 ∈ A0 (X ) in
all cases.
(cid:3)
For smooth cubic hypersurfaces, the last part of Proposition 2.1 is a consequence
of the fact that a cubic hypersurface containing a line has unirational parameteriza-
tions of degree 2. This fact that was likely known to M. Noether (cf. [16, App. B]).
Theorem 2.2. Let X ⊂ Pn+1
, with n ≥ 2, be a smooth cubic hypersurface contain-
k
ing a k-line L. Then X has a unirational parameterization of degree 2.
Proof. Denote by W the variety of pairs (p, l) where p ∈ L and l is a line in Pn+1
k
tangent to X at p. Then the pro jection W → L is a Zariski locally trivial Pn−1 -
bundle. A general such line l intersects X in one further point, defining a rational
map g : W → X . This map is two-to-one. Indeed, as before, for a general point
p ∈ X , the plane through p and L meets X in the union of L and a smooth conic.
Generally, that conic meets L in two points. The lines through p, and tangent to
X , are exactly those connecting p to these two points of intersection.
We can give another argument, following [32, §2.1]. Pro jecting from L displays X
as birational to the total space of a conic bundle Y → Pn−1
, where Y is the blow-up
k
of X in L. Each point P in the base Pn−1
corresponds to a plane containing L, and
k
intersecting X with this plane is the union of L and a conic CP ; this conic is the fiber
above P in the conic bundle. Let M be the incidence variety of pairs (P , p) where
P ∈ Pn−1
and p ∈ L, such that p ∈ CP . Then the pro jection M → Pn−1
has degree
k
k
2, the fiber over each P is exactly the two points of intersection of L and CP . The
other pro jection M → L displays M as the total space of a Zariski locally trivial
Pn−2 -bundle, hence M is rational. Then consider the base change of Y → Pn−1
by
k
M → Pn−1
. The resulting conic bundle M ×Pn−1
Y → M has a tautological rational
k
k
section. Thus M ×Pn−1
Y is rational (being a conic bundle over M with a rational
k
section) and the pro jection to Y has degree 2.
(cid:3)
Over an algebraically closed field, any cubic hypersurface X ⊂ Pn+1 , with n ≥ 2,
contains a line. Indeed, by taking hyperplane sections, one is reduced to the well
knwon fact that any cubic surface X ⊂ P3 contains a line over an algebraically
closed field, see [46, Prop. 7.2] for instance. Proposition 2.1 and Theorem 1.4 then
yield the following corollary.
Corollary 2.3. Let X ⊂ Pn+1
, with n ≥ 2, be a smooth cubic hypersurface over
k
a field k.
If X contains a k-line (e.g., if k is an algebraical ly closed field) then
A0 (X ) is universal ly 2-torsion and thus for every cycle module M over k, the group
Mnr (X/k) is universal ly 2-torsion.
Hassett and Tschinkel [35, §7.5] prove that the cubic fourfolds over C with a
unirational parameterization of odd degree are Zariski dense in the moduli space.
10
AUEL, COLLIOT-TH ´EL `ENE, PARIMALA
In particular, they prove that on a Zariski dense subset of the Noether–Lefschetz
divisor Cd , with d = 2(m2 + m + 1) for m ≥ 1, the cubic fourfolds have a unirational
parameterization of degree m2 + m + 1. The countable union of these loci is dense in
the moduli space. Together with Corollary 2.3, this implies that such cubic fourfolds
X have universally trivial A0 (X ), and thus for every cycle module M over C, the
group Mnr (X/k) is universally trivial.
Corollary 2.3 leaves the following questions open. Let X ⊂ Pn+1 , with n ≥ 2, be
a smooth cubic hypersurface over C.
a) Is the group A0 (X ) universally trivial?
nr (X/C, µ⊗(i−1)
b) For any integer i ≥ 1, are the unramified cohomology groups H i
2
universally trivial?
)
The following theorem gathers previously known results.
Theorem 2.4. Let X ⊂ Pn+1
be a smooth cubic hypersurface over a field k of
k
characteristic zero. Then H i
nr (X/k , Q/Z(1)) is universal ly trivial for al l n ≥ 3 and
0 ≤ i ≤ 2. If k = C, then H 3
nr (X/k , Q/Z(2)) is trivial for al l 3 ≤ n ≤ 4.
Proof. Let F /k be any field extension. For any complete intersection Y ⊂ Pn+1
of
F
dimension ≥ 3 over F , the restriction map on Picard groups Pic(Pn+1
) → Pic(Y ) is
F
an isomorphism and the natural map on Brauer groups Br(F ) → Br(Y ) is an iso-
morphism, see [45, Thm. A.1]. By purity, for any smooth variety Y over F , we have
´et (Y , Q/Z(1)) and that H 2
nr(Y /F , Q/Z(1)) = H 1
that H 1
nr(Y /F , Q/Z(1)) = Br(Y ), see
[23, Cor. 3.2, Prop. 4.1] and [11]. From the Kummer sequence for a pro jective and
geometrically connected variety X over F , we get an the exact sequence
1 → F ×/F ×n → H 1
´et (X, µn ) → Pic(X )[n] → 0
which yields an exact sequence
0 → H 1 (F , Q/Z(1)) → H 1
´et (X, Q/Z(1)) → Pic(X )tors → 0.
upon taking direct limits.
When X ⊂ Pn+1
is a smooth cubic hypersurface, the above considerations imply
k
that H i
nr(X/k , Q/Z(1)) is universally trivial for i = 1, 2. Also H 0
nr(X/k , Q/Z(1)) is
universally trivial since X is geometrically irreducible.
Now assume k = C. If n = 3, then X contains a line hence is birational to a
conic fibration over P2 , as in the proof of Theorem 2.2. For a conic bundle Y over a
complex surface, one has H 3
nr (Y /C, Q/Z(2)) = 0 (cf. [20, Cor. 3.1(a)]). If n = 4 and
X contains a plane, then X is birational to a fibration Y → P2 in 2-dimensional
quadrics, and once again [20, Cor. 3.1(a)] yields H 3
nr(X/C, Q/Z(2)) = 0.
For n ≥ 2 arbitrary, X is unirational hence rationally chain connected. Then [25,
Thm. 1.1] implies that the integral Hodge conjecture for codimension 2 cycles on X
is equivalent to the vanishing of H 3
nr (X/C, Q/Z(2)).
For smooth cubic threefolds, the integral Hodge conjecture holds for codimen-
sion 2 cycles, as H 4 (X, Z) is generated by a line. This yields another proof of
H 3
nr(X/C, Q/Z(2)) = 0 in the case n = 3.
For smooth cubic fourfolds, the integral Hodge conjecture for codimension 2 cy-
cles is a result of Voisin [56, Thm. 18], building on [44] and [58]. We thus get
nr(X/C, Q/Z(2)) = 0 for an arbitrary smooth cubic hypersurface X ⊂ P5 .
H 3
(cid:3)
Our main result, Theorem 1, is a first step beyond the mentioned results.
UNIVERSAL UNRAMIFIED COHOMOLOGY OF CUBIC FOURFOLDS
11
3. Unramified cohomology of quadrics
Let Q be a smooth quadric over a field k of characteristic 6= 2 defined by the
vanishing of a quadratic form q . We note that the dimension of Q (as a k-variety) is
2 less than the dimension of q (as a quadratic form). When Q has even dimension,
one defines the discriminant d(Q) ∈ H 1 (k , µ2 ) of Q to be the (signed) discriminant
of q . If Q has even dimension and trivial discriminant or has odd dimension, then
define the Clifford invariant c(Q) ∈ Br(k) of Q to be the Clifford invariant of q ,
i.e., the Brauer class of the Clifford algebra C (q) or the even Clifford algebra C0 (q),
respectively. We point out when q has even rank and trivial discriminant, then a
choice of splitting of the center induces a decomposition C0 (q) ∼= C +
0 (q) × C −0 (q),
with C (q), C +
0 (q), and C −0 (q) all Brauer equivalent central simple k-algebras. Under
the given constraints on dimension and discriminant, these invariants only depend
on the similarity class of q , and thus yield well-defined invariants of Q.
The following two results are well known (cf. [1, §5, p. 485]; see also the proof of
[24, Th´eor`eme 2.5]), though we could not find the second stated in the literature.
Theorem 3.1. Let k be a field of characteristic 6= 2. Let Q be a smooth quadric
surface over k. Then
ker(cid:0)Br(k) → Br(k(Q))(cid:1) = (0
Z/2Z · c(Q)
where c(Q) is the Clifford invariant of Q.
Proposition 3.2. Let k be a field of characteristic 6= 2. Let Q be a quadric surface
cone over k, the base of which is a smooth conic Q0 . Then
ker(cid:0)Br(k) → Br(k(Q))(cid:1) = Z/2Z · c(Q0 )
where c(Q0 ) is the Clifford invariant of Q0 .
k ), hence ker(cid:0)Br(k) → Br(k(Q))(cid:1) equals
Proof. In this case k(Q) ∼= k(Q0 ×k P1
ker(cid:0)Br(k) → Br(k(Q0 ))(cid:1). Thus the proposition follows from the case of smooth
conics, a result going back to Witt [57, Satz p. 465].
(cid:3)
Finally, the deepest result we will need is the following one concerning the degree
three unramified cohomology of a quadric.
if d(Q) is nontrivial
if d(Q) is trivial
Theorem 3.3 (Kahn–Rost–Sujatha [36, Thm. 5]). Let k be a field of characteristic
6= 2. Let Q be a smooth quadric surface over k. Then the natural map
H 3 (k , Q/Z(2)) → H 3
nr(Q/k , Q/Z(2))
is surjective.
The following is an amplification of one the main results of Arason’s thesis.
Theorem 3.4. Let k be a field of characteristic 6= 2. Let Q be a smooth quadric
surface over k defined by a nondegenerate quadratic form q of rank 4. Then the
kernel of the map H 3 (k , Q/Z(2)) → H 3 (k(Q), Q/Z(2)) coincides with the kernel of
the map H 3 (k , µ⊗2
2 ) → H 3 (k(Q), µ⊗2
2 ), and it is equal to the set of symbols
{(a, b, c) : q is similar to a subform of ≪ −a, −b, −c ≫}.
12
AUEL, COLLIOT-TH ´EL `ENE, PARIMALA
Proof. By a standard norm argument, the kernel of H 3 (k , Q/Z(2)) → H 3 (k(Q), Q/Z(2))
is 2-torsion. By Merkurjev’s theorem (see Theorem 1.1), the two kernels in the The-
orem thus coincide. The precise description of the kernel with coefficients Z/2Z is
Arason’s [1, Satz 5.6].
(cid:3)
However, for our purposes, we will only need to know that certain special symbols
are contained in this kernel. We can give a direct proof of this fact.
Lemma 3.5. Let k be a field of characteristic 6= 2. If < 1, −a, −b, abd > is isotropic
over k, then for w any norm from k(√d)/k, the symbol (a, b, w) ∈ H 3 (k , µ⊗2
2 ) is
trivial.
Proof. Put l = k(√d). As < 1, −a, −b, abd > is isotropic, there exist x, y , u, v ∈ k
such that x2 − ay2 = b(u2 − adv2 ) 6= 0. The class (a, x2 − ay2 ) is trivial, hence
(a, b, w) = (a, (x2 − ay2 )/(u2 − adv2 ), w) = (a, u2 − adv2 , w).
Let w = Nl/k (w ′ ). By the pro jection formula, we have that
(a, b, w) = coresk(√d)/k (a, u2 − adv2 , w ′ )
which is trivial since (a, u2 − adv2 ) = (a, u2 − a(√dv)2 ) ∈ H 2 (l, µ⊗2
2 ) is trivial. (cid:3)
4. Cubic fourfolds containing a plane and Clifford algebras
Let X be a smooth cubic fourfold over a field k . Suppose X ⊂ P5
k = P(V ) contains
a plane P = P(W ), where W ⊂ V is a dimension 3 linear subspace of V . Let eX be
the blow-up of X along P and π : eX → P(V /W ) the pro jection from P . We will
write P2
k = P(V /W ). Then the blow-up of P5
k along P is isomorphic to the total
space of the pro jective bundle p : P(E ) → P2
(−1),
) ⊕ OP2
k , where E = (W ⊗ OP2
k
k
and in which π : eX → P2
k embeds as a quadric surface bundle.
Now choose homogeneous coordinates (x0 : x1 : x2 : y0 : y1 : y2 ) on P5
k . Since
Autk (P5 ) acts transitively on the set of planes in P5
k , without loss of generality, we
can assume that P = {x0 = x1 = x2 = 0}. Write the equation of X as
X0≤m≤n≤2
amnymyn + X0≤p≤2
bp yp + c = 0
for homogeneous linear polynomials amn , quadratic polynomials bp , and a cubic
polynomial c in k [x0 , x1 , x2 ]. Then we define a quadratic form q : E → OP2
(1) over
k
P2
k by
amnymyn + X0≤p≤2
q(y0 , y1 , y2 , z ) = X0≤m≤n≤2
(−1). Of course, given X , the quadratic
and z of OP2
on local sections yi of OP2
k
k
form q is only well-defined up to multiplication by an element of Γ(X, Gm ) = k× .
(1)) is precisely π : eX → P2
k . The
The quadric fibration associated to (E , q , OP2
k
associated bilinear form bq : E → E ∨ ⊗ OP2
(1) has Gram matrix
k
b0
a02
a01
2a00
a12
b1
a01
2a11
b2
2a22
a12
a02
b0
b1
b2
2c
bp ypz + cz 2
(2)
(3)
UNIVERSAL UNRAMIFIED COHOMOLOGY OF CUBIC FOURFOLDS
13
whose determinant ∆ is a homogeneous sextic polynomial defining the discriminant
divisor D ⊂ P2
k .
Proposition 4.1. Let X be a smooth cubic fourfold containing a plane P over a
field k of characteristic 6= 2. Denote by π : eX → P2
k the associated quadric surface
bund le, D ⊂ P2
k the discriminant divisor, and U = P2
k r D . Then the fol lowing are
equivalent:
a) The divisor D is smooth over k.
b) The fibers of q are nondegenerate over points of U and have a radical of
dimension 1 over points of D .
c) The fibers of π are smooth quadric surfaces over points of U and are quadric
surface cones with isolated singularity over points of D .
d) There is no other plane in X ×k k meeting P ×k k.
In this case, we say that π has simple degeneration.
Proof. The equivalence between a and b is proved in [7, I Prop. 1.2(iii)] over an
algebraically closed field and [3, Prop. 1.6] in general. The equivalence of b and c
follows from the fact that the singular locus of a quadric is the pro jectivization of its
radical. The statement that d implies a appears without proof in [54, §1 Lemme 2],
and holds over a general field. Finally, another plane intersecting P nontrivially
will give rise, in the pro jection, to a singular line or plane in a fiber of the quadric
fibration, contradicting c.
(cid:3)
(1)), cf. [3, §1.5]. It
Let C0 be the even Clifford algebra associated to (E , q , OP2
k
is a locally free OP2
-algebra of rank 8 whose center Z is a locally free quadratic
k
-algebra (cf. [38, IV Prop. 4.8.3]). The discriminant cover r : S = Spec Z → P2
OP2
k
is a finite flat double cover branched along the sextic D ⊂ P2
k .
Assuming simple degeneration, then S is a smooth K3 surface of degree 2 over
k . We say that a cubic fourfold X containing a given plane P is very general if the
quadric surface bundle associated to P has simple degeneration and the associated
K3 surface S satisfies r∗ : Pic(P2
k ) → Pic(S ) is an isomorphism. If the ground field k
is algebraically closed, then for any overfield F of k , by rigidity of the N´eron–Severi
group, this implies that r∗ : Pic(P2
F ) → Pic(SF ) is an isomorphism. We note that in
the moduli space C8 of smooth cubic fourfolds containing a plane over C, the locus
of very general ones (in our definition) is the complement of countably many proper
Zariski closed subvarieties (see [33, Thm. 1.0.1]). Thus this notion of very general
agrees with the usual notion in algebraic geometry.
A cubic fourfold X containing a plane P over C is very general if and only if the
Chow group CH2 (X ) of cycles of codimension 2 is spanned by the classes of P and of
a fiber Q of the quadric fibration (see [54, §1 Prop. 2] and its proof ). A very general
cubic fourfold X has nontrivial Clifford invariant. Indeed, the Zariski closure of a
rational section of the quadric fibration would provide a cycle of dimension 2 having
one point of intersection with a general fiber Q. Such a cycle cannot be rationally
equivalent to any linear combination of P and Q, since both P and Q have even
intersection with Q. Hence X cannot be very general (see [34, Thm. 3.1]).
Still assuming simple degeneration, the even Clifford algebra C0 , considered over
its center, defines an Azumaya quaternion algebra B0 over S (cf. [42, Prop. 3.13]
14
AUEL, COLLIOT-TH ´EL `ENE, PARIMALA
and [5, Prop. 1.13]). We refer to the Brauer class βX,P ∈ Br(S ) of B0 as the Clifford
invariant of the pair (X, P ).
Lemma 4.2. Let X be a smooth cubic fourfold containing a plane P over a field
k of characteristic 6= 2. Assume that the quadric surface bund le associated to P
has simple degeneration. Let S be the associated K3 surface of degree 2.
If X
contains another plane P ′ (necessarily skew to P ), then the fibration π : eX → P2
k
has a rational section. In this case, the generic fiber of π is an isotropic quadric over
k(P2 ), hence is a k(P2 )-rational variety. In particular, the k-variety X is k-rational.
Moreover, βX,P = 0 ∈ Br(S ).
Proof. Recall how the fibration π : eX → P2
k is constructed. One fixes an arbitrary
plane Q ⊂ P5
k which does not meet P . The morphism π is induced by the morphism
: X \ P → Q sending a point x of X not on P to the unique point of intersection
of the linear space spanned by P and x with the linear space Q.
Let P ′ be another plane in X . By Proposition 4.1, P ′ must be skew to P . Take
the plane Q to be P ′ . On points of P ′ ⊂ X the map : X \ P ′ → P ′ is the identity.
Thus π has a rational section, the generic fiber is an isotropic quadric, hence rational
over k(P2 ), and the even Clifford invariant of this quadric is trivial.
(cid:3)
In view of this lemma, when given a smooth cubic fourfold containing a plane P
whose associated quadric fibration has simple degeneration, we shall abuse notation
and write βX ∈ Br(S ) instead of βX,P ∈ Br(S ).
(1)) is a quadratic form of rank 4 over k(P2 ) with
The generic fiber of (E , q , OP2
k
values in a k(P2 )-vector space of dimension 1. Choosing a generator l of OP2
(1)
k
over k(P2 ), we arrive at a usual quadratic form (E , q) with discriminant extension
k(S )/k(P2 ). The generic fiber of βX is then in the image of the restriction map
Br(k(P2 )) → Br(k(S )) by the fundamental relations for the even Clifford algebra
(cf. [39, Thm. 9.12]). Explicitly, the full Clifford algebra C (E , q) is central simple
over k(P2 ) and its restriction to k(S ) is Brauer equivalent to the even Clifford algebra
C0 (E , q), hence with the generic fiber of βX . We note that C (E , q) depends on the
choice of l, while C0 (E , q) does not. We now construct a particular Brauer class
on k(P2 ) restricting to βX on k(S ). This will play a crucial role in the proof of
Theorem 1.
Proposition 4.3. Let X be a smooth cubic fourfold containing a plane P over a
field k of characteristic 6= 2 . Assume that the associated quadric surface bund le
has simple degeneration along a divisor D ⊂ P2
k and let S be the associated K3
surface of degree 2. Given a choice of homogeneous coordinates on P5
k , there exists
a line L ⊂ P2
k and a quaternion algebra α over k(P2 ) whose restriction to k(S ) is
isomorphic to the generic fiber of the Clifford invariant βX , and such that α has
ramification only at the generic points of D and L.
k , let L ⊂ P2
Proof. For a choice of homogeneous coordinates on P5
k be the line whose
equation is a00 from (2). The smoothness of X implies that a00 is nonzero. Then
on A2
k = P2
k r L, the choice of a00 determines a trivialization ψ : O (1)A2
k → OA2
,
k
with respect to which the quadratic form q ′ = ψ ◦ q A2
k → OA2
: E A2
(given by
k
k
the dehomogenization of equation (2) associated to ψ) represents 1. Letting V =
k , we have that (E V , q ′ V , OV ) is a regular quadratic form of rank
k r (D ∪ L) ⊂ A2
P2
UNIVERSAL UNRAMIFIED COHOMOLOGY OF CUBIC FOURFOLDS
15
4 on V . In this case, we have the full Clifford algebra C = C (E V , q ′ V , OV ) at our
disposal, which is an Azumaya algebra of degree 4 on V .
Let us prove that C k(P2 ) is Brauer equivalent to a symbol. Since q ′ k(P2 ) represents
1, we have a diagonalization
q ′ k(P2 ) =< 1, a, b, abd >
where d ∈ k(P2 )×/k(P2 )× 2 is the discriminant. Then in Br(k(P2 )) we have
[C k(P2 ) ] = (a, b) + (a, abd) + (b, abd) + (−1, −d) = (−ab, −ad)
by the formula [49, Ch. 2, Def. 12.7,Ch. 9, Rem. 2.12] relating the Clifford invariant
to the 2nd Hasse–Witt invariant.
Letting α = (−ab, −ad) ∈ Br(k(P2 )), we see that α coincides with [C k(P2 ) ] in
Br(k(P2 )), hence is unramified at all codimension 1 points of V , i.e., α is ramified
at most at the generic points of D and L.
The even Clifford algebra is a similarity class invariant, hence we have an an iso-
morphism C0 (E V , q ′ V , OV ) ∼= C0 (E V , q V , O (1)V ) over V , hence over the inverse
image of V in S .
Finally, we have C k(S ) ∼= M2(cid:0)B0 k(S )(cid:1), hence α restricted to k(S ) is Brauer
equivalent to the generic fiber of the Clifford invariant βX ∈ Br(S ).
(cid:3)
5. Proof of the main result
0
(4)
/ H 3 (F , Q/Z(2))
Let us recall the statement.
Theorem 5.1. Let X ⊂ P5 be a very general cubic fourfold containing a plane
P ⊂ P5 over C. Then H 3
nr(X/C, Q/Z(2)) is universal ly trivial.
Let k be a field of characteristic 6= 2. Let X ⊂ P5
k be a smooth cubic fourfold
containing a plane over k . Let π : eX → P2
k be the associated quadric surface bundle.
We assume that π has simple degeneration along a smooth divisor D ⊂ P2
k , see
Proposition 4.1. Denote by Q the generic fiber of π ; it is a smooth quadric surface
over k(P2 ). For any field extension F /k , we will need to refer to the following
commutative diagram of Bloch–Ogus complexes
M H 2 (F (γ ), Q/Z(1))
H 3 (F (P2 ), Q/Z(2)) {∂γ } /
/ M H 2 (F (Qγ ), Q/Z(1))
where the sums are taken over all points γ of codimension 1 of P2
F . The top row is
the exact sequence defining the unramified cohomology of P2
F (which is constant, by
Proposition 1.2) via the residue maps ∂γ . The bottom row is the complex arising
from taking residues on F (Q) at points of codimension 1 of eX whose image in P2
F is
nr(QF /F (P2 ), Q/Z(2)) consists of classes over
F (recall that H 3
of codimension 1 on P2
F (Q) which have trivial residues at all rank 1 discrete valuations trivial on F (P2 )).
Here, Qγ denotes the generic fiber of the restricted quadric fibration π C : eX C →
C , where C ⊂ P2
F is a pro jective integral curve with generic point γ . Under the
simple degeneration hypothesis, each Qγ is an integral quadric surface. The bottom
nr(QF /F (P2 ), Q/Z(2)),
complex is also exact. This is obvious except at the term H 3
/ H 3
nr(QF /F (P2 ), Q/Z(2))
0
/ H 3
nr(X/F , Q/Z(2))
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
16
AUEL, COLLIOT-TH ´EL `ENE, PARIMALA
and we shall not used the exactness at that point. The vertical maps in the diagram
are the natural ones.
nr (XF /F , Q/Z(2)) ⊂ H 3
Let ψ ∈ H 3
nr(QF /F (P2 ), Q/Z(2)). By Theorem 3.3, this
is the image of an element ξ ∈ H 3 (F (P2 ), Q/Z(2)). By the commutativity of the
right-hand square, and since the bottom row of diagram (4) is a complex, for each
γ of codimension 1 in P2
F we know that
∂γ (ξ ) ∈ ker(cid:0)H 2 (F (γ ), Q/Z(1)) → H 2 (F (Qγ ), Q/Z(1))(cid:1).
(5)
We recall that if F is any field, then H 2 (F , Q/Z(1)) is isomorphic to the prime-to-p
part of the Brauer group Br(F ), where p is the characteristic of F . With the notation
of §4, where the line L is defined by a00 = 0, let d = ∆/a6
00 . Then div(d) = D − 6L,
and the class of d in k(P2 )/k(P2 )×2 is the discriminant of the quadric Q.
Definition 5.2. Fix L as above. Let F /k be a field extension and ξ a class in
H 3 (F (P2 ), Q/Z(2)). We call an integral curve C ⊂ P2
F with generic point γ a bad
curve (for ξ ) if C is different from DF and LF and if ∂γ (ξ ) 6= 0 in H 2 (F (γ ), Q/Z(1)).
There are finitely many bad curves for each given ξ ∈ H 3 (F (P2 ), Q/Z(2)). Let
α ∈ H 2 (k(P2 ), µ2 ) be the class of a quaternion algebra attached to π : eX → P2
k and
the choice of a line L, as in Proposition 4.3. Theorem 3.1 and Proposition 3.2 imply
that the following statements hold concerning bad curves:
a) The class dγ ∈ H 1 (F (γ ), µ2 ) is trivial.
b) The class αγ ∈ H 2 (F (γ ), µ2 ) is nontrivial and coincides with c(Q)γ ∈
Br(F (γ )).
c) The class ∂γ (ξ ) ∈ H 2 (F (γ ), Q/Z(1)) also coincides with c(Q)γ ∈ Br(F (γ )).
For curves C split by the discriminant extension (e.g., for bad curves), we will
construct special rational functions that are parameters along C and are norms from
the discriminant extension. This is where the very general hypothesis will be used.
Lemma 5.3. Let k be a field of characteristic 6= 2. Let r : S → P2
k be a finite
flat morphism of degree 2 branched over a smooth sextic curve D . Assume that
k ) → Pic(S ) is an isomorphism. Choose a line L ⊂ P2
r∗ : Pic(P2
k and a function d ∈
k(P2 ) with divisor D − 6L that satisfies k(S ) = k(P2 )(√d). If C ⊂ P2
k is an integral
curve (with generic point γ ) different from D and L such that dγ ∈ H 1 (k(γ ), µ2 ) is
trivial, then there exists a function fγ ∈ k(P2 ) whose divisor is C − 2nL for some
positive integer n, and which is a a norm from k(S )/k(P2 ).
Proof. Under our hypothesis, Pic(S ) = CH1 (S ) = ZH , where H = r∗L by flat pull-
back. As a consequence, the action of Aut(S/P2 ) on Pic(S ) = CH1 (S ) is trivial.
If the class of d is a square in k(γ ), then f −1C splits as C1 ∪ C2 , with C1 and
C2 both having class nH for some positive integer n. Hence C1 − nH = div(gγ ) for
some gγ ∈ k(S ). However, by proper push-forward, r∗ (C1 − nH ) = C − 2nL, hence
C − 2nL = div(Nk(S )/k(P2 ) (gγ )). Set fγ = Nk(S )/k(P2 ) (gγ ).
(cid:3)
Remark 5.4. From the proof of Lemma 5.3, one sees that every bad curve C has
even degree. Using some further intersection theory, one can even prove that any
such curve has degree 6, though we shall not need this.
Now assume that k = C. Let α ∈ Br(C(P2 )) be the class of the full Clifford
algebra (E , q , O (1)) over P2 r (D ∪ L), as in Proposition 4.3. Then α is unramified,
except possibly at the generic points of D and L.
UNIVERSAL UNRAMIFIED COHOMOLOGY OF CUBIC FOURFOLDS
17
Now assume that X is very general. Fix a field F /C. For each bad curve C
over F , we will choose a parameter fγ ∈ F (P2 ) at the generic point γ of C as in
Lemma 5.3, which we may apply since r∗ : Pic(P2
F ) → Pic(SF ) is an isomorphism
by the rigidity of the N´eron–Severi group. Denote by
f = Y fγ ,
where the product is taken over all bad curves.
Let us continue with the proof of Theorem 1. Recall that we have lifted ψ ∈
nr(XF /F , Q/Z(2)) to an element ξ ∈ H 3 (F (P2 ), Q/Z(2)). We now compute the
H 3
residues of ξ along codimension one points of P2
F , where we need only worry about
the generic points of D , any bad curves C , and L.
Let us first consider the generic point η of D . The hypothesis that X is very
general implies simple degeneration, hence that the F (η)-quadric Qη is a quadric
cone over a smooth F (η)-conic. The conic is split by Tsen’s theorem since it is the
base change of a smooth C(η)-conic. Hence Proposition 3.2, and the commutativity
of the right hand square of diagram (4), implies that ξ is unramified at η .
Now, we will compare ξ with the class α ∪ (f ), whose ramification we control. Re-
lying on Theorem 1.1, we are implicitly considering an inclusion H 3 (F (P2 ), µ⊗2
2 ) ⊂
H 3 (F (P2 ), Q/Z(2)). By construction, the function f is a norm from the extension
F (P2 )(√d)/F (P2 ), i.e., is of the form f = g2 − dh2 for some g , h ∈ F (P2 ). Also, f
has its zeros and poles only along the bad curves and L, hence in particular, f is a
unit at the generic point η of D .
The extension F (P2 )(√d)/F (P2 ) is totally ramified at η . In particular, any unit
in the local ring at η which is a norm from F (P2 )(√d) reduces to a square in the
residue field F (η). Thus f lifts to a square in the completion [F (P2 )η .
Now we consider the residues of α ∪ (f ) ∈ H 3 (F (P2 ), µ⊗2
2 ) along codimension
one points of P2
F . Both α ∈ H 2 (F (P2 ), µ2 ) and (f ) ∈ H 1 (F (P2 ), µ2 ) are unramified
away from the generic points of D , L, and the bad curves C .
At the generic point η of D , the function f is a square in the completion [F (P2 )η .
Thus, the residue of α ∪ (f ) at η is zero. At a bad curve, α is regular and the
valuation of f is one. Thus the residue at such a curve is αγ = c(Q)γ .
Thus, we have that the difference ξ − α ∪ (f ) ∈ H 3 (F (P2 ), Q/Z(2)) has trivial
residues away from L, hence it comes from a constant class ξ0 in the image of
H 3 (F , Q/Z(2)) → H 3 (F (P2 ), Q/Z(2)).
Now we show that α ∪ (f ) vanishes when restricted to H 3 (F (Q), µ⊗2
2 ). In the
notation of the proof of Proposition 4.3, q F (P2 ) =< 1, a, b, abd > becomes isotropic
over F (Q) and α = (−ab, −ad). Since f is a norm from F (P2 )(√d), Lemma 3.5
implies that (a, b, f ) is trivial in H 3 (F (Q), µ⊗2
2 ). Further, since f is a norm from
F (P2 )(√d), we have (d, f ) = 0.
But then
α ∪ (f ) = (ab, ad, f ) = (a, b, f ) + (a, a, f ) + (ab, d, f )
is trivial in H 3 (F (Q), µ⊗2
2 ) as well. Thus ψ ∈ H 3
nr(XF /F , Q/Z(2)) is the image of
the constant class ξ0 ∈ H 3 (F , Q/Z(2)).
Remark 5.5. We can give a different argument, using Arason’s result (see Theo-
rem 3.4), for the vanishing of α ∪ (f ) in H 3 (F (Q), µ⊗2
2 ). As in the notation of the
18
AUEL, COLLIOT-TH ´EL `ENE, PARIMALA
proof of Proposition 4.3, we write qk(P2) = < 1, a, b, abd > and α = (−ab, −ad). The
3-Pfister form associated to α ∪ (f ) decomposes as
≪ −ab, −ad, f ≫ = < 1, ab, ad, bd >⊥ −f < 1, ab, ad, bd >
Since f is a norm from F (P2 )(√d) we have that d is a norm from F (P2 )(√f ). Thus
d is a similarity factor of the norm form of F (P2 )(√f )/F (P2 ), i.e., we have an
isometry < 1, −f > ∼= < d, −df >. Hence the 3-Pfister form
≪ −ab, −ad, f ≫ = < 1, ab, ad, bd >⊥ −f < 1, ab, ad, bd >
= < ab, ad, bd >⊥< 1, −f >⊥ −f < ab, bd, ad >
= < ab, ad, bd >⊥< d, −df >⊥ −f < ab, bd, ad >
= < d, ab, ad, bd >⊥ −f < d, ab, bd, ad >
contains the form < d, ad, bd, ab > = d < 1, a, b, abd >. Thus by Theorem 3.3, we
have that α ∪ (f ) is trivial in H 3
nr (QF /F (P2 ), Q/Z(2)).
Corollary 5.6. Let X ⊂ P5 be a very general cubic fourfold containing a plane
nr(X/C, µ⊗2
P ⊂ P5 over C. Then H 3
2 ) is universal ly trivial.
Proof. In the following commutative diagram
H 3 (F , µ⊗2
2 )
nr(XF /F , µ⊗2
/ H 3
2 )
H 3 (F , Q/Z(2))
/ H 3
nr(XF /F , Q/Z(2))
the horizontal maps are injective since we may specialize to an F -rational point. The
nr(XF /F , µ⊗2
vertical maps are injective by Theorem 1.1. By Theorem 5.1, any ψ ∈ H 3
2 ) ⊂
nr(XF /F , Q/Z(2)) is the image of a constant class ξ0 ∈ H 3 (F , Q/Z(2)), which by
H 3
the diagram is 2-torsion, hence comes from an element in H 3 (F , µ⊗2
2 ). Since the
right hand side vertical map is injective, the proof is complete.
(cid:3)
References
[1] J. Kr. Arason, Cohomologische Invarianten quadratischer Formen, J. Algebra 36 (1975), 448–
491. 11, 12
[2] M. Artin, and D. Mumford, Some elementary examples of unirational varieties which are not
rational, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 25 (1972), 75–95. 8
[3] A. Auel, M. Bernardara, and M. Bolognesi, Fibrations in complete intersections of quadrics,
Clifford algebras, derived categories and rationality problems, preprint arXiv:1109.6938, 2013,
Journal de Math´ematiques Pures et Appliqu´ees, to appear. 13
[4] A. Auel, M. Bernardara, M. Bolognesi, and A. V´arilly-Alvarado, Cubic fourfolds containing a
plane and a quintic del Pezzo surface, preprint arXiv:1205.0237. 1
[5] A. Auel, R. Parimala, and V. Suresh, Quadric surface bund les over surfaces, preprint
arXiv:1207.4105. 14
[6] R. Barlow, Rational equivalence on zero cycles for some more surfaces with pg = 0, Invent.
math. 79 (1985), 303–308. 7
[7] A. Beauville, Vari´et´es de Prym et jacobiennes interm´ediaires, Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. (4)
10, no. 3, 1977, 309–391. 13
[8] A. Beauville and R. Donagi, La vari´et´e des droites d’une hypersurface cubique de dimension 4,
C.R. Acad. Sc. Paris, S´erie I 301 (1985), 703–706. 1
[9] S. Bloch, Lectures on Algebraic Cycles, Duke Univ. Math. Ser. IV, Durham, 1980. Second
edition. New Mathematical Monographs 16. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010. 6
[10] S. Bloch, A. Kas, and D. Lieberman, Zero-cycles on surfaces with pg = 0, Compositio math.
33 (1976) 135–145. 7
/
/
UNIVERSAL UNRAMIFIED COHOMOLOGY OF CUBIC FOURFOLDS
19
[18]
[20]
[19]
[11] S. Bloch and A. Ogus, Gersten’s conjecture and the homology of schemes, Ann. Sci. ´Ecole
Norm. Sup. (4) 7 (1974), 181–201. 10
[12] S. Bloch and V. Srinivas, Remarks on correspondences and algebraic cycles, Amer. J. Math.
105 (1983), no. 5, 1235–1253. 6, 7
[13] F. Campana, Connexit´e rationnel le des vari´et´es de Fano, Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. (4) 25
(1992), no. 5, 539–545. 7
[14] L. Campedelli, Sopra alcuni piani doppi notevoli con curve di diramazione d el decimo ordine,
Atti Acad. Naz. Lincei 15 (1932), 536–542. 7
[15] G. Castelnuovo, Sul le superficie di genere zero, Memorie della Soc.It. delle Scienze (detta dei
XL), ser. III, t. 10, (1896). 7
[16] C.H. Clemens and P. A. Griffiths, The intermediate Jacobian of the cubic threefold Ann. of
Math. (2) 95 (1972), 281–356. 9
[17] J.-L. Colliot-Th´el`ene, Birational invariants, purity and the Gersten conjecture, K -theory and
algebraic geometry: connections with quadratic forms and division algebras (Santa Barbara,
CA, 1992), Amer. Math. Soc., Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 58 (1995), 1–64. 2, 3, 4
Formes quadratiques multiplicatives et vari´et´es alg´ebriques : deux compl´ements, Bulletin
de la Soci´et´e Math´ematique de France 108 (1980), 213–227. 2
Un th´eor`eme de finitude pour le groupe de Chow des z´ero-cycles d’un groupe alg´ebrique
lin´eaire sur un corps p-adique, Invent. math. 159 (2005), no. 3, 589–606. 5, 8
Quelques cas d’annulation du troisi`eme groupe de cohomologie non ramifi´ee, Contem-
pory Math. 571 (2012), 45–50. 10
[21] J.-L. Colliot-Th´el`ene and D. Coray, L’´equivalence rationnel le sur les points ferm´es des surfaces
rationnel les fibr´ees en coniques, Compositio Math. 39 (1979), no. 3, 301–332. 4
[22] J.-L. Colliot-Th´el`ene and W. Raskind, K2 -cohomology and the second Chow group, Math. Ann.
270 (1985), no. 2, 165–199. 7
[23] J.-L. Colliot-Th´el`ene and J.-J. Sansuc, Cohomologie des groupes de type multiplicatif sur les
sch´emas r´eguliers, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´er. A-B, no. 6, 287 (1978), A449–A452. 10
[24] J.-L. Colliot-Th´el`ene and A.N. Skorobogatov, Groupe de Chow des z´ero-cycles sur les fibr´es en
quadriques, K -Theory 7 (1993), no. 5, 477–500. 11
[25] J.-L. Colliot-Th´el`ene and C. Voisin, Cohomologie non ramifi´ee et conjecture de Hodge enti`ere,
Duke Math. J. 161 (2012), no. 5, 735–801. 10
[26] F. Enriques, Introduzione al la geometria sopra le superficie algebriche, Memorie della Societa’
Italiana delle Scienze (detta “dei XL”), s.3 , to. X, (1896), 1–81. 7
[27]
, Memorie scelte di geometria, vol. I, Zanichelli, Bologna, 1956. 7
[28] H. Esnault, Varieties over a finite field with trivial Chow group of 0-cycles have a rational
point, Invent. math. 151 (2003), no. 1, 187–191. 7
[29] G. Fano, Sul le forme cubiche del lo spazio a cinque dimensioni contenenti rigate rationali di
quarto ordine, Comment. Math. Helv. 15 (1943), 71–80. 1
[30] W. Fulton, Intersection theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3) vol. 2,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984. 4, 5
[31] L. Godeaux, Les involutions cycliques appartenant `a une surface alg´ebrique, Actual. Sci. Ind.
270, Hermann, Paris, 1935. 7
[32] J. Harris, B. Mazur, and R. Pandharipande, Hypersurfaces of low degree, Duke Math. J. 95
(1998), no. 1, 125–160. 9
[33] B. Hassett, Special cubic fourfolds, Compos. Math. 120 (2000), no. 1, 1–23. 1, 13
[34]
, Some rational cubic fourfolds, J. Algebraic Geometry 8 (1999), no. 1, 103–114. 1, 13
[35] B. Hassett and Y. Tschinkel, Rational curves on holomorphic symplectic fourfolds, Geom.
Funct. Anal. 11 (2001), no. 6, 1201–1228. 9
[36] B. Kahn, Bruno, M. Rost, and R. Sujatha, Unramified cohomology of quadrics. I, Amer. J.
Math. 120 (1998), no. 4, 841–891. 5, 11
[37] N.A. Karpenko and A.S. Merkurjev, On standard norm varieties, Ann. Sc. ´Ec. Norm. Sup. 46
(2013), 175–214. 5
[38] M.-A. Knus, Quadratic and hermitian forms over rings, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991. 13
[39] M.-A. Knus, A. Merkurjev, M. Rost, and J.-P. Tignol, The Book of Involutions, Colloquium
Publications, vol. 44, AMS, 1998. 14
20
AUEL, COLLIOT-TH ´EL `ENE, PARIMALA
[40] M.-A. Knus, R. Parimala, and R. Sridharan, On rank 4 quadratic spaces with given Arf and
Witt invariants, Math. Ann. 274 (1986), no. 2, 181–198. 1
[41] J. Koll´ar, Y. Miyaoka, and S. Mori, Rational connectedness and boundedness of Fano manifolds,
J. Differential Geom. 36 (1992), no. 3, 765–779. 7
[42] A. Kuznetsov, Derived categories of quadric fibrations and intersections of quadrics, Adv.
Math. 218 (2008), no. 5, 1340–1369. 13
[43] A.S. Merkurjev, Unramified elements in cycle modules, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 78 (2008),
no. 1, 51–64. 2, 5
[44] J.P. Murre, On the Hodge conjecture for unirational fourfolds, Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc.
Ser. A 80 (Indag. Math. 39) (1977), no. 3, 230–232. 2, 10
[45] B. Poonen and J.F. Voloch (with appendices by J.-L. Colliot-Th´el`ene and N.M. Katz), Random
diophantine equations, Arithmetic of Higher-Dimensional Algebraic Varieties, (Bjorn Poonen
and Yuri Tschinkel, eds.), pp. 175–184, Progress in Mathematics, Vol. 226, 2004, Birkhauser
Boston, Cambridge, MA. 2, 10
[46] M. Reid, Undergraduate algebraic geometry, London Mathematical Society Student Texts, vol.
12, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988. 9
[47] T. Reye, Die Geometrie der Lage, Vortrage, Baumgartner, Leipzig, 1882. 7
[48] M. Rost, Chow groups with coefficients, Doc. Math.1 (1996), no. 16, 319–393. 4
[49] W. Scharlau, Quadratic and Hermitian forms, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wis-
senschaften 270, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985. 15
[50] R. Swan, Zero cycles on quadric hypersurfaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 107 (1989), no. 1,
43–46. 5
[51] S.L. Tregub, Three constructions of rationality of a cubic fourfold, Vestnik Moskov. Univ. Ser.
I Mat. Mekh. (1984), no. 3, 8–14. Translation in Moscow Univ. Math. Bull. 39 (1984), no. 3,
8–16. 1
[52]
, Two remarks on four-dimensional cubics, Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 48 (1993), no. 2(290),
201–202. Translation in Russian Math. Surveys 48 (1993), no. 2, 206–208. 1
[53] C. Voisin, Bloch’s conjecture for Catanese and Barlow surfaces, preprint arXiv:1210.3935, 2013,
Journal of Differential Geometry (volume dedicated to the memory of Friedrich Hirzebruch),
to appear. 7
, Th´eor`eme de Torel li pour les cubiques de P5 , Invent. math. 86 (1986), no. 3, 577–601.
[54]
13
[55]
, Hodge theory and complex algebraic geometry. I, II. Translated from the French by
Leila Schneps. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 76, 77, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, 2007. 7
, Some aspects of the Hodge conjecture, Jpn. J. Math. 2 (2007), no. 2, 261–296. 2, 10
[56]
[57] E. Witt, Uber ein Gegenbeispiel zum Normensatz, Math. Z. 39 (1935), no. 1, 462–467. 11
[58] S. Zucker, The Hodge conjecture for cubic fourfolds, Compositio Math. 34 (1977), no. 2, 199–
209. 2, 10
Asher Auel, Department of Mathematics, Yale University, 10 Hillhouse Avenue,
E-mail address: [email protected]
New Haven, CT 06511, USA
R. Parimala, Department of Mathematics & CS, Emory University, 400 Dowman
Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
E-mail address: [email protected]
Jean-Louis Colliot-Th´el`ene, CNRS, Universit´e Paris-Sud, Math´ematiques, Batiment
425, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France
E-mail address: [email protected]
|
1403.3981 | 3 | 1403 | 2016-09-01T09:05:45 | Geometric Langlands in prime characteristic | [
"math.AG",
"math.RT"
] | Let $G$ be a semisimple algebraic group over an algebraically closed field $k$, whose characteristic is positive and does not divide the order of the Weyl group of $G$, and let $\breve G$ be its Langlands dual group over $k$. Let $C$ be a smooth projective curve over $k$. Denote by $\Bun_G$ the moduli stack of $G$-bundles on $C$ and $ \Loc_{\breve G}$ the moduli stack of $\breve G$-local systems on $C$. Let $D_{\Bun_G}$ be the sheaf of crystalline differential operators on $\Bun_G$. In this paper we construct an equivalence between the bounded derived category $D^b(\on{QCoh}(\Loc_{\breve G}^0))$ of quasi-coherent sheaves on some open subset $\Loc_{\breve G}^0\subset\Loc_{\breve G}$ and bounded derived category $D^b(D_{\Bun_G}^0\on{-mod})$ of modules over some localization $D_{\Bun_G}^0$ of $D_{\Bun_G}$. This generalizes the work of Bezrukavnikov-Braverman in the $\GL_n$ case. | math.AG | math |
GEOMETRIC LANGLANDS IN PRIME CHARACTERISTIC
TSAO-HSIEN CHEN, XINWEN ZHU
Abstract. Let G be a semisimple algebraic group over an algebraically closed
field k, whose characteristic is positive and does not divide the order of the Weyl
group of G, and let G be its Langlands dual group over k. Let C be a smooth pro-
jective curve over k of genus at least two. Denote by BunG the moduli stack of G-
bundles on C and LocSys G the moduli stack of G-local systems on C. Let DBunG
be the sheaf of crystalline differential operators on BunG. In this paper we con-
struct an equivalence between the bounded derived category Db(QCoh(LocSys0
G))
of quasi-coherent sheaves on some open subset LocSys0
G ⊂ LocSys G and bounded
derived category Db(D0
BunG of
DBunG . This generalizes the work of Bezrukavnikov-Braverman in the GLn case.
BunG -mod) of modules over some localization D0
Contents
Introduction
1.
2. The Hitchin fibration
3. Classical duality
4. Multiplicative 1-forms
5. Main result
Appendix A. Beilinson's 1-motive
Appendix B. D-modules on stacks and Azumaya property
Appendix C. Abelian Duality
References
1
6
13
29
36
44
50
54
56
1. Introduction
1.1. Geometric Langlands conjecture in prime characteristic. Let G be a
reductive algebraic group over C and let G be its Langlands dual group. Let C
be a smooth projective curve over C. Let BunG be the stack of G-bundles on
C and LocSys G be the stack of de Rham G-local systems on C. The geometric
Langlands conjecture (GLC), as proposed by Beilinson and Drinfeld, is a conjectural
equivalence between certain appropriately defined category of quasi-coherent sheaves
on LocSys G and certain appropriately defined category of D-modules on BunG. A
precise formulation of this conjecture (over C) can be found in the recent work of
Dima Arinkin and Dennis Gaitsgory [AG, Ga].
The geometric Langlands duality has a classical limit which amounts to the duality
of Hitchin fibrations. The classical duality is established "generically" by Donagi
and Pantev in [DP1] over C.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 14D24, 22E57.
Key words and phrases. Langlands duality, Hitchin fibration, D-modules in characteristic p.
1
In this paper, we establish a "generic" characteristic p version of the geometric
Langlands conjecture. Namely, let G be a semi-simple algebraic group over an
algebraically closed field k of characteristic p that does not divide the order of the
Weyl group of G, and G be its Langlands dual group, defined over k. Let C be
a smooth projective curve over k of genus at least two1. Then we establish an
equivalence of bounded derived category
(1.1.1)
Db(D -mod(BunG)0) ≃ Db(QCoh(LocSys G)0),
where D -mod(BunG)0 (resp. QCoh(LocSys G)0) is a certain localization of the cat-
egory of D-modules on BunG (resp. a localization of the category of quasi-coherent
sheaves on LocSys G). We call (1.1.1) a "generic" version of the GLC.
One remark is in order. Recall that over a field of positive characteristic, there
are different objects that can be called D-modules. In this paper, we use the notion
of crystalline D-modules, i.e. D-modules are quasi-coherent sheaves with a flat
connection. Likewise, the stack LocSys G is the stack of G-bundles on C with a flat
connection.
1.2. Summary of the construction. The case G = GLn has been considered
by R. Bezrukavnikov and A. Braverman in [BB] (see [Groe, Trav] for various exten-
sions). The main observation is that, the geometric Langlands duality in characteris-
tic p formulated in the above form can be thought as a twisted version of its classical
limit. Since the classical duality holds "generically", they proved a "generic" version
of the GLC in the case when G = GLn.
Our generalization to any semisimple group G is based on the same observation,
but some new ingredients are needed in this general situation.
One of the main difficulties for general G is that the classical duality is more
complicated. For G = GLn, the generic fibers of the Hitchin fibration are the Picard
stacks of line bundles on the corresponding spectral curves and the duality of Hitchin
fibrations in this case essentially amounts to the self-duality of the Jacobian of an
algebraic curve. However, for general G, the fibers of the Hitchin fibration involve
more general Picard stacks, such as the Prym varieties, etc., and the duality of the
Hitchin fibrations for G and G over C are the main theme of [DP1] (see [HT] for
the case G = SLn). As commented by the authors, the arguments in [DP1] use
transcendental methods in an essential way and therefore cannot be applied to our
situation directly.
Our first step is to extend the classical duality to any reductive group G over
any algebraically closed field k whose characteristic does not divide the order of the
Weyl group of G. Let us first give its statement, and leave the details to §3. For
a reductive group G and a smooth projective curve C over k, and a positive line
bundle L on C, let HiggsG,L → B denote the corresponding Hitchin fibration, on
which the Picard stack PL → B acts (see §2 for a review). There is an open subset
B0 ⊂ B such that PLB0 is a Beilinson 1-motive (a Picard stack that is essentially
an abelian variety, see Appendix A). Fix a nondegenerate bilinear form on the Lie
algebra g of G, one can identify the Hitchin base B and the corresponding open
subset B0 for G and G. The classical duality is the following assertion.
1The assumptions on the genus of C and on the semisimplicity of G should not be essential. We
impose them to avoid the DG structure on moduli spaces.
2
Theorem 1.2.1. For a positive line bundle L on C, there is a canonical isomor-
phism of Picard stacks
(1.2.1)
where (PLB0 )∨ is the dual Picard stack of PLB0 (as defined in Appendix A).
Dcl : (PLB0)∨ ≃ PLB0,
Now assume that the characteristic of k is positive. In addition, assume that the
genus of C is at least two and that L = ωC is the canonical bundle. We will omit the
subscript ωC and write P = PωC etc. The second step then is to construct a twisted
version of the above classical duality in this situation. To explain its meaning, let
us first introduce a notation: If X is a stack over k, we denote by X ′ its Frobenius
twist, i.e., the pullback of X along the absolute Frobenius endomorphism of k. Let
FX : X → X ′ denote the relative Frobenius morphism. We will replace both sides
of (1.2.1) by certain torsors under P ′∨ and P ′.
We begin to explain the P ′-torsor
H , which was introduced in [CZ]. There
is a smooth commutative group scheme J ′ on C ′ × B′ and P ′ in fact classifies
J ′-torsors. Let us denote by J p the pullback of J ′ along the relative Frobenius
FC ′×B′/B′ : C × B′ → C ′ × B′. This is a group scheme with a canonical connection
along C, and therefore it makes sense to talk about J p-local systems on C × B′
H be the stack of
and their p-curvatures (see [CZ, Appendix] for generalities). Let
J p-local systems with some specific p-curvature τ ′. This is a P ′-torsor.
Next we explain the P ′∨-torsor TD(θm). According to general nonsense (Appendix
A), such a torsor gives a multiplicative Gm-gerbe D on P ′ and vice versa. So it
is enough to explain this multiplicative Gm-gerbe D(θm) on P ′. First recall that
the sheaf of crystalline differential operators on P can be regarded as a Gm-gerbe
DP on the cotangent bundle T ∗P ′. We will construct a 1-form θm on P ′, which is
multiplicative (in the sense of §C.2). Now, D = D(θm) is the gerbe on P ′ obtained
via pullback of DP along the map θm : P ′ → T ∗P ′.
The twisted version of the classical duality is the following assertion
Theorem 1.2.2. Over B
′0, there is a canonical isomorphism of P ′∨ ≃ P ′-torsors
D : TD(θm)B′0 ≃ H B′0.
The final step towards (1.1.1) is to establish two abelianization theorems. An-
other difference between the geometric Langlands correspondence for GLn and for
a general group G is that in the latter case, there is no canonical equivalence in
general. As is widely known to experts (e.g. see [FW]), the geometric Langlands
correspondence for general G should depend on a choice of theta characteristic of
the curve C.
Let us fix a square root κ of ωC. Then the Kostant section of Higgs′
G → B′
G. The first abelianization theorem asserts a
induces a map ǫκ′
canonical isomorphism
: P ′ → Higgs′
ǫ∗
κ′ DBunG ≃ D(θm),
where DBunG is the Gm-gerbe (on Higgs′
operators on BunG and D(θm) is the Gm-gerbe on P ′ mentioned above.
G = T ∗ Bun′
G) of crystalline differential
On the dual side, we constructed a canonical morphism in [CZ]
C : H ×
P ′
Higgs′
G
3
→ LocSys G,
and the Kostant section of Higgs′
G
Cκ : H ≃ LocSysreg
G
,
→ B′ induces an isomorphism
where LocSysreg
G
is a certain open substack of LocSys G (see [CZ, Remark 3.14]).
Combining the above three steps and a general version of the Fourier-Mukai trans-
form (Appendix A) will give the desired equivalence (1.1.1).
Let us mention that the morphism C was obtained in [CZ] as a version of Simpson
correspondence for smooth projective curves in positive characteristic.
Finally in §5.5 and §5.6, we discuss how the equivalence constructed above depends
on the choice of the theta characteristic. This can be regarded as a verification of
the predictions of [FW, §10] in our settings.
1.3. The Langlands transform. To claim that the above equivalence is the con-
jectural geometric Langlands transform, one needs to verify several properties that
it is supposed to satisfy. We will only briefly discuss these properties (see [Ga] for
more details), and leave the verifications to our next work.
The first property is that the equivalence should intertwine the action of the Hecke
operators on the automorphic side and the action of the Wilson operators on the
spectral side. Recall that in the case k = C, both categories D(D -mod(BunG)) and
D(Qcoh(LocSys G)) admit actions of a family of commuting operators, labeled by
points x on the curve and representations V of the group G. Namely, for x ∈ C and
V ∈ Rep( G), there is the so-called Wilson operator WV,x acting on Qcoh(LocSys G)
by tensoring with the locally free sheaf VEuniv LocSys G ×{x}. On the other side, there
is the Hecke operator HV,x acting on D -mod(BunG) via certain integral transform
(e.g.
see [BD, §5]). The second property is that the equivalence should satisfy
the Whittaker normalization. Namely, the Whittaker D-module FΨ on BunG is
supposed to transformed to the structure sheaf OLocSys G
In the positive characteristic, it is yet not clear how to define Hecke operators
(except those corresponding to minuscule coweights) due to lack of the notion of
intersection cohomology D-modules. Our observation is that by the geometric
Casselman-Shalika formula ([FGV]), the two properties together will imply that
the Whittaker coefficients of D-modules on BunG can be calculated by applying the
Wilson operators on their Langlands transforms and then taking the global sections.
This is a well formulated statement in characteristic p and we will verify in the future
work that this is satisfied by the equivalence constructed here.
.
The third property is that the equivalence should be compatible with Beilinson-
Drinfeld's construction of automorphic D-modules via opers ([BD]).
In the case
G = GLn this property has been verified in [BT]. We plan to return to this in the
future work.
1.4. Structure of the article. Let us now describe the contents of this paper in
more detail.
In §2 we collect some facts about Hitchin fibrations that are used in this paper.
Main references are [N1, N2].
In §3 we prove the classical duality, i.e., the duality of Hitchin fibrations. This
extends the work of [DP1] (over C) to any algebraically closed field whose char-
acteristic does not divide the order of the Weyl group of G.
In §3.8, we discuss
the compatibility of the classical duality with twisting by Z( G)-torsors. This is
4
used to study the dependence of the equivalence (1.1.1) on the choice of the theta
characteristic in §5.5 and §5.6.
In §4 we construct a canonical multiplicative 1-form θm on P ′.
In §5 we deduce our main Theorem 5.0.4 from the twisted duality (see §5.2) and
the two abelianization theorems (see §5.3).
There are three appendices at the end of the paper.
In §A we collect some basic facts about Beilinson's 1-motive and duality on Beilin-
son's 1-motive. In particular, we state a general version of Fourier-Mukai transforms
for Beilinson's 1-motives.
In §B we recall the basic theory of D-modules over varieties and stacks in positive
characteristic, following [BMR, BB, OV, Trav].
In §C we prove the abelian duality for good Beilinson's 1-motives. It asserts that
the derived category of D-modules on a "good" Beilinson's 1-motive A is equivalent
to the derived category of quasi-coherent sheaves on the universal extension A ♮ by
vector groups of its dual A ∨.
1.5. Notations.
1.5.1. Notations related to algebraic stacks. Our terminology of algebraic stacks fol-
lows the book [LB]. Let k be an algebraically closed field and let p be the charac-
teristic component of k. Let S be a Noetherian scheme over k. In this paper, an
algebraic stack X over S is a stack such that the diagonal morphism
∆S : X → X ×S X
is representable and quasi-compact and such that there exists a smooth presentation,
i.e., a smooth, surjective morphism X → X from a scheme X.
An algebraic stack X is called smooth over S if for every S-scheme U mapping
smoothly to X , the structure morphism U → S is smooth.
For any algebraic stack X , we denote by XEt the big ´etale site of X . We denote
by Xsm the smooth site on X , i.e., the site for which the underling category has
objects consisting of S-schemes U together with a smooth morphism U → X and
has morphisms V → U smooth 2-morphisms over X and for which covering maps
are smooth surjective maps of schemes. If X is a Deligne-Mumford stack, we denote
by Xet the small ´etale site of X .
Let Y → X be a quasi-projective morphism of algebraic stacks, with X smooth
and proper over S. We denote by SectS(X , Y ) the stack of "sections" of Y over
X , i.e., for any u : U → S we have
SectS(X , Y )(U ) = HomX (X ×S U, Y ).
If the base scheme S = Spec(k), we write Sect(X , Y ) = SectS(X , Y ).
If X is a smooth algebraic stack over S, we define the relative tangent stack
T (X /S) as the stack that assigns every Spec R → S, the groupoid
It is algebraic and the natural inclusion R → R[ǫ]/ǫ2 induces a morphism
T (X /S)(R) := X (R[ǫ]/ǫ2).
τX : T (X /S) → X .
It is known that T (X /S) is a relative Picard stack over X . Therefore, one can
associate to it a complex in D[−1,0](X , Z), called the relative tangent complex:
T •
X /S = {TX /S → TX }.
5
The relative cotangent stack is then defined as
T ∗(X /S) := SpecX (SymOX H 0(T •
X /S)).
Let f : X → Y be a (representable) morphism between two algebraic stacks over
S. We denote the cotangent morphism as the following diagram of maps
(1.5.1)
T ∗(Y /S) ×Y X
fd
T ∗(X /S)
.
fp
T ∗(Y /S)
1.5.2. Notations related to Frobenius morphism. Let S be a Noetherian k-scheme
and X → S be an algebraic stack over S. If pOS = 0, we denote by F rS : S → S
the absolute Frobenius map of S. We have the following commutative diagram
X
X (S)
πX /S
X
FX /S
"❋❋❋❋❋❋❋❋❋❋
S
F rS
/ S
where the square is Cartesian. We call X (S) the Frobenius twist of X along S, and
FX /S : X → X (S) the relative Frobenius morphism. If the base scheme S is clear,
X (S) is also denoted by X ′ for simplicity.
1.5.3. Notation related to torsors. Let G be a smooth affine group scheme over X,
and E be a G-torsor on X. We denote by Aut(E) = E ×G G the adjoint torsor and
ad(E) or gE = E ×G Lie G the adjoint bundle.
1.6. Acknowledgement. We thank Roman Bezrukavnikov, Roman Travkin and
Zhiwei Yun for useful discussions, and Uwe Weselmann for helpful comments and
suggestions. The first author would like to thank his advisor Roman Bezrukavnikov
for continuous interest in this work and many helpful advices. T-H. Chen is par-
tially supported by NSF under the agreement No.DMS-1128155. X. Zhu is partially
supported by NSF grant DMS-1001280/1313894 and DMS-1303296 and AMS Cen-
tennial Fellowship.
2. The Hitchin fibration
In this section, we review some basic geometric facts of Hitchin fibrations, follow-
ing [N1, N2]. Only §2.7 is probably new.
2.1. Notations related to reductive groups. Let G be a reductive algebraic
group over k of rank l. We denote by G its Langlands dual group over k. We denote
by g (resp. by g) the Lie algebra of G (resp. G). Let T denote the abstract Cartan
of G with its Lie algebra t. The counterparts on the Langlands dual side are denoted
by T ,t. We denote by W the abstract Weyl group of G, which acts on T and T . We
denote by X•(T ) or simply by X• (resp. by X•(T ) or simply by X•) the character
(resp. the cocharacter) group of T . Let Φ ⊂ X•(T ) be the set of roots. Sometimes,
we also fix a set of simple roots {α1, . . . , αl} and an embedding t ⊂ g. Then for
α ∈ Φ, let gα ⊂ g denote the corresponding root subspace.
6
/
/
/
/
"
/
/
/
From now on, we assume that the char k = p is zero or p ∤ W. We fix a W-
invariant non-degenerate bilinear form ( , ) : t × t → k and identify t with t using
( , ). This invariant form also determines a unique G-invariant non-degenerate
bilinear form g × g → k, still denoted by ( , ). Let g ≃ g∗ be the resulting G-
equivariant isomorphism.
2.2. Hitchin map. Let k[g] and k[t] be the algebras of polynomial functions on
g and on t respectively. By Chevalley's theorem, we have an isomorphism k[g]G ≃
k[t]W. Moreover, k[t]W is isomorphic to a polynomial ring of l variables u1, . . . , ul and
each ui is homogeneous in degree ei. Let c = Spec(k[t]W). The natural Gm action on
g induces a Gm-action on c and under the isomorphism c ≃ Spec(k[u1, . . . , ul]) ≃ Al
the action is given by
h · (a1, . . . , al) = (he1 a1, . . . , helal).
Let χ : g → c be the map induced by k[c] ≃ k[g]G ֒→ k[g].
It is a G × Gm-
equivariant map where G acts trivially on c. Similarly, let π : t → c be the map
induced by k[c] ֒→ k[t], which is also Gm-equivariant. Let L be an invertible sheaf
on C and L× be the corresponding Gm-torsor. We denote by gL = g ×Gm L×,
tL = t ×Gm L×, and cL = c ×Gm L× the Gm-twist of g, t, and c with respect to the
natural Gm-action.
Let HiggsG,L = Sect(C, [gL/G]) be the stack of sections of [gL/G] over C. I.e., for
each k-scheme S the groupoid HiggsG,L(S) consist of maps:
or equivalently, those maps
hE,φ : C × S → [gL/G],
hE,φ : C × S → [g/G × Gm]
such that the composition of hE,φ with the projection [g/G × Gm] → BGm is given
by the Gm-torsor L×. Explicitly, HiggsG,L(S) consist of pairs (E, φ) (called Higgs
bundles), where E is an G-torsor over C×S and φ is an element in Γ(C×S, ad(E)⊗L)
known as the Higgs field. If the group G is clear from the context, we simply write
HiggsL for HiggsG,L.
Let BL = SectSpec k(C, cL) be the scheme of sections of cL over C. I.e., for each
k-scheme S, BL(S) is the set of sections
or equivalently, those maps
b : C × S → cL,
b : C × S → [c/Gm]
such that the composition of b with the projection [c/Gm] → BGm is given by L×.
It is called the Hitchin base of G.
The natural G-invariant projection χ : g → c induces a map
[χL] : [gL/G] → cL,
or more generally
(2.2.1)
[χ/G × Gm] : [g/G × Gm] → [c/Gm].
The map [χL] induces a natural map
hL : HiggsL = Sect(C, [gL/G]) → Sect(C, cL) = BL.
Definition 2.2.1. We call hL : HiggsL → BL the Hitchin map associated to L.
7
For any b ∈ BL(S) we denote by HiggsL,b the fiber product S ×BL HiggsL.
Observe that the invariant bilinear form t × t → k induces a canonical isomor-
phism t ≃ t∗ =: t, compatible with the W-action. Therefore, there is a canonical
isomorphism c ≃ c and BL ≃ BL. In what follows, we will identify them.
Let ω = ωC be the canonical line bundle of C. We are mostly interested in the
case L = ω. For simplicity, from now on we denote B = Bω, Higgs = Higgsω,
h = hω : Higgs → B, and Higgsb = HiggsωC ,b. We sometimes also write HiggsG for
Higgs to emphasize the group G. Observe that the bilinear form as in §2.1 together
with the Serre duality induces an isomorphism Higgs ≃ T ∗ BunG (cf. [H]).
2.3. The Kostant section. In this section, we recall the construction of the Kostant
section of the Hitchin map hL. For each simple root αi we choose a nonzero vector
fi ∈ g−αi. Let f = ⊕l
i=1fi ∈ g. We complete f into an sl2 triple {f, h, e} and denote
by ge the centralizer of e in g. A theorem of Kostant says that f + ge consist of
regular elements in g and the restriction of χ : g → c to f + ge is an isomorphism
onto c. We denote by
kos : c ≃ f + ge
the inverse of χf +ge. Let ρ(Gm) denote the following Gm-action on g:
trivially on t, and on gα by ρ(t)x = tht(α)x where ht(α) = P ni if α = P niαi.
We have ρ(t)f = t−1f and ρ(t)e = te, in particular ge is invariant under ρ(Gm).
We define a new Gm-action on g by ρ+(t) = tρ(t). Then ρ+(t)f = f and ρ+(Gm)
preserves f + ge. With respect to this action, the isomorphism kos : c ≃ f + ge is
Gm-equivariant.
It acts
The diagonal map Gm → Gm × Gm induces a map
[g/ρ+(Gm)] → [g/Gm × ρ(Gm)].
By precomposing with the map [c/Gm]
kos
≃ [f +ge/ρ+(Gm)] → [g/ρ+(Gm)] we obtain
[c/Gm] → [g/Gm × ρ(Gm)].
If the action of ρ(Gm) on g factors through the adjoint action of G, for example
when G is adjoint, then there is a map [g/Gm × ρ(Gm)] → [g/Gm × G] which defines
a section
[c/Gm] → [g/Gm × ρ(Gm)] → [g/Gm × G]
of (2.2.1), and in particular, we get a section of hL. In general, the action ρ(Gm)
does not necessarily factor through G, but its square does since it is given by the
co-character 2ρ : Gm → G where 2ρ is the sum of positive coroots. So if we denote
G[2]
m is isomorphic to Gm, but regarded as its the
double cover), we get a map
η1/2 : [c/G[2]
m → Gm the square map (so G[2]
m )] → [g/G[2]
m ] → [g/G[2]
m × ρ(G[2]
m × G].
Let L1/2 be a square root of L. Then every b : S × C → [c/Gm] in BL(S) factors
m ]. Therefore, by composing with η1/2,
through a unique map b1/2 : S × C → [c/G[2]
we get a lift of b:
η1/2(b) : S × C b1/2
−→ [c/G[2]
m ]
η1/2
−→ [g/G[2]
m × G] → [g/Gm × G].
The assignment b → η1/2(b) defines a section
ηL1/2 : BL → HiggsL
8
of the Hitchin map hL.
We fix a square root κ = ω1/2 (called a theta characteristic) of ω and write
κ = ηκ : B → Higgs.
2.4. Cameral curve. For any b ∈ BL(S), the cameral curve eCb is defined as the
fiber product
eCb
πb
tL
.
C × S b
/ cL
When b = id : BL → BL, the corresponding cameral curve eCL := eCb is called the
universal cameral curve. For simplicity, we will write eC = eCω, π = πb : eC → C × B.
2.5. The universal centralizer group schemes. Consider the group scheme I
over g consisting of pairs
I = {(g, x) ∈ G × g Adg(x) = x}.
We define J = kos∗I, where kos : c → g is the Kostant section. This is called the
universal centralizer group scheme of g (see Proposition 2.5.1). To study it, it is
convenient to introduce two auxiliary group schemes. We define J 1 = Rest/c(T )W
and let J 0 to be the neutral component of J 1. All the group schemes J, J 0 and J 1
are smooth commutative group schemes over c. The following proposition is proved
in [N1] (see also [DG]).
Proposition 2.5.1.
(1) There is a unique morphism of group schemes a : χ∗J → I ⊂ G × g, which
extends the canonical isomorphism χ∗Jgreg ≃ Igreg . .
(2) There are natural inclusions J 0 ⊂ J ⊂ J 1.
(3) The inclusion J ⊂ J 1 = Rest/c(T )W in part (2) defines a morphism
of group schemes over t, which is an isomorphism over trs,
j1 : π
∗J → T × t
All the above constructions can be twisted. Namely, there are Gm-actions on I,
J, J 1 and J 0. Moreover, the Gm-action on I can be extended to a G × Gm-action
given by (h, t) · (x, g) = (t · hxh−1, hgh−1). The natural morphisms J → c and I → g
are Gm-equivariant, and therefore we can twist everything by the Gm-torsor L× to
get JL → cL, IL → gL where JL = J ×Gm L× and IL = I ×Gm L× . Similarly, we
have J 0
L. The
group scheme IL over gL is equivariant under the G-action, hence it descends to a
group scheme [IL] over [gL/G].
L → cL, and there are natural inclusions J 0
L → cL and J 1
L ⊂ JL ⊂ J 1
2.6. Symmetries of Hitchin fibration. Let b : S → BL be an S-point of BL,
corresponding to a map b : C × S → cL. Pulling back JL → cL along this map, we
obtain a smooth group scheme Jb = b∗J over C × S.
Let Pb be the Picard category of Jb-torsors over C × S. The assignment b → Pb
defines a Picard stack over B, denoted by PL. Let us fix b ∈ BL(S), and let
(E, φ) ∈ HiggsL,b corresponding to the map hE,φ : C × S → [gL/G]. Observe that
9
/
/
/
the morphism χ∗J → I in Proposition 2.5.1 induces [χL]∗JL → [IL] of group schemes
over [gL/G]. Pulling back to C × S using hE,φ, we get a map
(2.6.1)
aE,φ : Jb → h∗
E,φ[I] = Aut(E, φ) ⊂ Aut(E),
which allows us to twist (E, φ) ∈ HiggsL,b by a Jb-torsor. This construction defines
an action of PL on HiggsL over BL.
Let Higgsreg
L
L . Following [N1, §4], we define B0
be the open stack of HiggsL consisting of (E, φ) : C → [gL/G]
that factors through C → [(greg)L/G]. If (E, φ) ∈ Higgsreg
L , then aE,φ above is an
isomorphism. The Kostant section ηL1/2 : BL → HiggsL factors through ηL1/2 :
BL → Higgsreg
L as the open sub-scheme of BL
consisting of b ∈ BL(k) such that the image of the map b : C → cL intersects the
discriminant divisor transversally. The following proposition can be extracted from
[DG, DP1, N1]:
Proposition 2.6.1. (1) The stack Higgsreg
by a choice of a Kostant section ηL1/2.
L is a PL-torsor, which can be trivialized
(2) One has Higgsreg
(3) The restriction of the universal cameral curve eCLB0 → B0
L = HiggsL ×BLB0
L.
L ×BLB0
L is a Beilinson's 1-motive .
The restriction PLB0
to B0
L
L to B0
L is smooth.
Remark 2.6.2. Let Disc : t → k be the discriminant function defined by
Disc = Y
dα,
α∈Φ
where Φ is the set of roots of G. The function Disc is W-invariant, and thus descends
to a function Disc on c. Moreover, the function Disc : c → k is Gm-equivariant
where Gm acts on k via the character t → tN and N = Φ. Let DiscL : cL → LN
be the twist of Disc. For any b : C → cL, we get a section
sb ∈ Γ(C, LN ).
The zeros of sb is the branch loci B of the cameral cover πb : eCb → C. If b ∈ B0
L(k),
then B is multiplicity free. Note that if deg L > 0 the branch loci B is non-empty.
2.7. The tautological section τ : c → Lie J . Recall that by Proposition 2.5.1,
there is a canonical isomorphism χ∗Jgreg ≃ Igreg . The sheaf of Lie algebras
Lie (Igreg ) ⊂ greg × g admits a tautological section τ : greg → Lie (Igreg ) given
by x 7→ x ∈ Lie Ix for x ∈ greg. This section descends to a tautological section
τ : c → Lie J.2 Recall the following property of τ [CZ, Lemma 2.2]
Lemma 2.7.1. Let x ∈ g, and ax : Jχ(x) → Ix ⊂ G be the homomorphism as in
Proposition 2.5.1 (1). Then dax(τ (x)) = x, where dax denotes the differential of ax.
Let us regard Lie J as a scheme over c. Besides the section τ , there is a canonical
map c : Lie J → c such that cτ = id. Namely, if we regard Lie (Igreg ) as a scheme,
then there is a natural map Lie (Igreg ) → c given by
Lie (Igreg ) ⊂ g × greg → c × greg → c,
which also descends to a morphism c : Lie J → c.
2Indeed, one can check that τ is equal to kos∗(τ ), the pullback of τ along the Kostant section
kos : c → greg.
10
The morphisms τ and c have global counterparts (see also [CZ, §2.3]). Observe
that Gm acts on g × greg via natural homotheties on both factors, and therefore on
χ∗Lie Jgreg ≃ Lie (Igreg ) ⊂ g × greg. This Gm-action on χ∗Lie Jgreg descends to a
Gm-action on Lie J, and for any line bundle L on C the L×-twist (Lie J) ×Gm L×
is Lie JL ⊗ L, where JL is introduced in §2.5. In addition, both maps τ and c are
Gm-equivariant with respect to this Gm-action on Lie J and the natural Gm-action
on c. Therefore, if we define a vector bundle BJ,L over BL, whose fiber over b ∈ BL
is Γ(C, Lie Jb ⊗ L), then by twisting τ and c by L, we obtain
(2.7.1)
τL : BL → BJ,L.
which is a canonical section of the projection pr : BJ,L → BL, and a canonical map
(2.7.2)
cL : BJ,L → BL
such that cLτL = id. As before, we omit the subscript L if L = ω for brevity.
Likewise, we introduce the vector bundle B∗
J,L over BL whose fiber over b is
Γ(C, (Lie Jb)∗ ⊗ L). Observe that B∗
J,L is not the dual of BJ,L. Rather, when L = ω,
it is the pullback e∗T ∗(PL/BL) of the cotangent bundle of PL → BL along the unit
section e : BL → PL and will also be denoted by T∗
e(PL) interchangeably later on.
We construct a section
(2.7.3)
as follows. The non-degenerate bilinear form ( , ) we fixed in 2.1 induces g ≃ g∗,
which restricts to a map Lie Ix → (Lie Ix)∗ for every x ∈ greg. This map descends
to give
J,L
L : BL → B∗
τ ∗
(2.7.4)
which is Gm-equivariant. We define τ ∗
before, we omit the subscript L if L = ω.
ι : Lie J → (Lie J)∗,
L as the twist of c
τ
→ Lie J
ι
→ (Lie J)∗. As
We give another interpretation of this map. Observe that the Kostant section κ
induces the map
over B, and therefore,
vκ : P → HiggsG → BunG ×B
T ∗(BunG) ×BunG
P
(vκ)d
T ∗(P/B)
.
(vκ)p
T ∗ BunG
Lemma 2.7.2. The map
P
κ×id→ T ∗(BunG) ×BunG
P
(vκ)d→ T ∗(P/B) ≃ T∗
e
P ×B P,
can be identified with
P
pr ×id
→ B × P
τ ∗×id−→ T∗
e
P ×B P.
Proof. For b ∈ B, we write the restriction of vκ over b by vκ,b : Pb → BunG. We
need to show that for x ∈ Pb, the image of the point
Pb ≃ (T∗
e
coincides with τ ∗(b). Let E denote the G-bundle vk,b(x).
vκ,b(x) BunG → T ∗
κ(x) ∈ T ∗
x
P)b
11
/
/
Observe that there is a universal G-torsor Euniv over [g/G] given by g → [g/G],
pr1→ [g/G].
and that ad(Euniv) → [g/G] is canonically isomorphic to [g/G] ×BG [g/G]
The cotangent map
(vκ,b)d : T ∗
vκ,b(x) BunG → T ∗
x
Pb
is induced by twisting
kos∗(ad(Euniv))∗ → (Lie J)∗
by the (G × Gm)-torsor (E × ω×). Therefore, it is enough to show that
κ(x) ∈ T ∗
vκ,b(x) BunG = Γ(C, gE ⊗ ω)
can be identified with the image of b under
τ (b) ∈ Γ(C, Lie Jb ⊗ ω) → Γ(C, gE ⊗ ω).
Let us consider the universal situation. Therefore, we need to show that
τ
→ Lie J → kos∗ad(Euniv) ≃ c ×BG [g/G]
c
is the same as
However, the composition
id×kos
→ c ×BG [g/G].
c
[g/G]
[χ]∗(τ )
→ [χ]∗Lie J → ad(Euniv) ≃ [g/G] ×BG [g/G]
restricts to a map [greg/G] → [greg/G] ×BG [g/G], which is easily checked to be the
diagonal map using the definition of τ . By pulling back this identification along
kos : c → [greg/G], we obtain the claim.
(cid:3)
By the similar argument, we have the following lemma, which will be used in §4.
Let j1 : π∗J → T × t be the map in Proposition 2.5.1, and let
(2.7.5)
dj1 : π
∗Lie J → t × t
denote its differential. Consider the pull back π∗τ : t → π∗Lie J of τ : c → Lie J
along π : t → c.
Lemma 2.7.3. The composition
δ : t
π
∗τ→ π
∗Lie J
dj1
→ t × t
is equal to the diagonal map ∆ : t → t × t.
Proof. For an embedding t ⊂ g, the restriction of dj1 to treg = t ∩ greg is just the
restriction to treg of the isomorphism Lie Jgreg ≃ Lie (Igreg ). This follows from the
construction of j1 as in [N2, Proposition 2.4.2]. Therefore, the restriction of δ to treg
is just the diagonal map. The lemma then follows.
(cid:3)
12
3. Classical duality
In this section, we fix a smooth projective curve C over k and a line bundle L on
C such that deg L > 0. Except §3.8, we also fix a connected reductive group G over
k. We assume that p = char k does not divide the order of the Weyl group of G. We
show that the PL ≃ P ∨
L as Picard stacks over B0. Note that this duality for k = C
is the main theorem of [DP1] (for G = SLn, see [HT]). However, as mentioned by
the authors, transcendental arguments are used in loc. cit. in an essential way, and
therefore cannot be applied directly to our situation. Our argument works for any
algebraically closed field k of characteristic zero or p with p ∤ W.
In fact, it is not hard to construct a canonical isogeny Dcl between PL and P ∨
L .
If the adjoint group of G does not contain a simple factor of type B or C, then
to show that Dcl is an isomorphism is relatively easy. It is to show that Dcl is an
isomorphism in the remaining cases that some complicated calculations are needed.
Observe in this section, we do not need to assume that L = ωC. We only need
the assumption that deg L is positive. However, to simplify the notations, we still
omit the subscript L.
3.1. Galois description of P. We first introduce several auxiliary Picard stacks.
Let eC → B be the universal cameral curve. There is a natural action of W on
eC. For a T -torsor ET on eC, and an element w ∈ W, there are two ways to produce
a new T -torsor. Namely, the first is via the pullback w∗ET = eC × w, eCET , and the
second is via the induction ET ×T,w T . We denote
w(ET ) = ((w−1)∗ET ) ×T,w T.
Clearly, the assignment ET 7→ w(ET ) defines an action of W on BunT (eC/B), i.e.
for every w, w′ ∈ W, there is a canonical isomorphism w(w′(ET )) ≃ (ww′)(ET )
satisfying the usual cocycle conditions.
Example 3.1.1. Let us describe w(ET ) more explicitly in the case G = SL2. Let
s be the unique nontrivial element in the Weyl group, acting on the cameral curve
s : eCb → eCb. If we identify T = Gm-torsors with invertible sheaves L, then
s(L) = s∗L−1.
Let BunW
T (eC/B) (or BunW
T for simplicity) denote the Picard stack of strongly W-
T (eC/B)(S) is
equivariant T -torsors on eC/B. By definition, for a B-scheme S, BunW
the groupoid of (ET , {γw, w ∈ W }), where ET is a T -torsor on eCS, and γw : w(ET ) ≃
ET is an isomorphism, satisfying the natural compatibility conditions. Another way
to formulate these compatibility conditions is provided in [DG]. Namely, for a T -
torsor ET , let AutW(ET ) be the group consisting of (w, γw), where w ∈ W and γw :
w(ET ) ≃ ET is an isomorphism. Then there is a natural projection AutW(ET ) → W.
T (eC/B)(S) is a pair (ET , γ), where γ : W → AutW(ET ) is a
Then an object of BunW
splitting of the projection.
T . Namely,
there is a non-constant group scheme T = eC ×W T on the stack [eC/W]. Then the
pullback functor induces an isomorphism from the stack BunT of T-torsors on [eC/W ]
to BunW
T .
T is given. We here refine
For later purpose, it is worthwhile to give another description of BunW
In [DG], a Galois description of P in terms of BunW
their description.
13
Let P 1 be the Picard stack over B classifying J 1-torsors on C × B. First, we
claim that there is a canonical morphism
j1,P : P 1 → BunW
T (eC/B).
(3.1.1)
(3.1.2)
To construct j1,P , recall that J 1 = (π∗(T × eC))W , where π : eC → C × B is the
projection, and therefore, for any J 1-torsor EJ 1 on C × S (where b : S → B is a test
scheme), one can form a T -torsor on eCS by
ET := π∗EJ 1 ×π∗J 1
T.
Clearly, ET carries on a strongly W-equivariant structure γ, and j1(EJ 1) = (ET , γ)
defines the morphism j1,P .
The morphism j1,P , in general, is not an isomorphism. Let us describe the image.
Let α ∈ Φ be a root and let iα : eCα → eC be the inclusion of the fixed point subscheme
of the reflection sα. Let Tα = T /(sα − 1) be the torus of coinvariants of the reflection
×T Tα and therefore
sα. Then sα(ET ) eCα
induces an automorphism of the Tα-torsor ET ×T Tα. In other words, there
γsα eCα
is a natural map
×T Tα is canonically isomorphic to ET eCα
r = Y
α∈Φ
rα : BunW
T (eC/B) → (Y
α∈Φ
Res eCα/B(Tα × eCα))W.
It is easy to see that r ◦ j1,P is trivial, and one can show that
Lemma 3.1.2. P 1 ≃ ker r. In other words, P 1(S) consists of those strongly W-
equivariant T -torsors (ET , γ) such that the induced automorphism of ET ×T Tα eCα
is trivial for every α ∈ Φ.
Proof. We shall show that every strongly W-equivariant T -torsor (ET , γ) such that
r(ET , γ) = 1 is Zariski locally on eC isomorphic to the trivial one, i.e., the trivial
T -torsor together with the canonical W-equivariance structure. If this is the case,
then the inverse map from ker r → P 1 is given as follows. For every strongly W-
equivariant T -torsor (ET , γ), π∗ET carries on an action of W. Namely, let x : S → C
be a point and m : S ×C eCb → ET be a point of π∗ET over x. Then w(m) is the
point of π∗ET over x given by
S ×C eCb
1×w−1
→ S ×C eCb
w−1(m)
→ (w−1)∗ET → w(ET )
s(w)
→ ET .
This W-action on π∗ET is compatible with the action of π∗(T × eC) in the sense that
w(mt) = w(m)w(t). Now let EJ 1 = (π∗ET )W , then as (E, γ) is locally isomorphic
to the trivial one, EJ 1 is locally isomorphic to J 1, and therefore is a J 1-torsor on C.
To prove the local triviality, we follow the argument as in [DG, Proposition 16.4].
One reduces to prove the statement for a neighborhood around a point x ∈ ∩α eCα.
By replacing eC by the local ring around x, one can assume that ET is trivial. Pick
up a trivialization, then the W-equivariance structure on ET amounts to a 1-cocycle
W → T (eC). By evaluating T (eC) at the unique closed point x, there is a short exact
sequence 1 → K → T (eC) → T (k) → 1. The condition r(ET , γ) = 1 would mean
that the cocycle takes value in K. Since there exists a filtration on K, such that the
associated graded is an Fp-vector space and p ∤ W, this cocycle is trivial.
(cid:3)
14
3.2. Recall that in [DG, N1], an open embedding J → J 1 is constructed. To
describe the cokernel, we need some notations. Let α ∈ Φ be a coroot. Let
µ α := ker(α : Gm → T ).
This is either trivial, or µ2, depending on whether α is primitive or not. Let µ α × eCα
be the constant group scheme over eCα, regarded as a sheaf of groups over eCα, and
let (iα)∗(µ α × eCα) be its push forward to eC. Now, the result of [DG, §11, 12] can
be reformulated as follows: there is a natural exact sequence of sheaves of groups
on C.
1 → J → J 1 → π∗(M
(iα)∗(µ α × eCα))W → 1.
α∈Φ
(3.2.1)
(3.2.2)
As a result, we obtain a short exact sequence of Picard stacks (see §A.2)
1 → (Y
α∈Φ
Res eCα/B(µ α × eCα))W → P → P 1 → 1.
To simplify the notation, we will denote Res eCα/B(µ α × eCα) by µ α(eCα) in the
sequel.
Consider the composition
j : P → P 1 → BunW
T (eC/B).
Combining Lemma 3.1.2 and (3.2.2), we recover a description of P in terms of
BunW
torsor (ET , γ), one obtains a canonical trivialization
T (eC/B) as given in [DG, §16.3]. Namely, given a strongly W-equivariant T -
(3.2.3)
E α◦α
T
:= (ET eCα
) ×T,α Gm ×Gm, α T ≃ E0
T eCα
,
. The condition that
given by (ET eCα
rα(E, γ) = 1 is equivalent to the condition that (3.2.3) comes from a trivialization
) ×T,α Gm ×Gm, α T ≃ ET eCα
T ) eCα
⊗ sα(E−1
(3.2.4)
cα : Eα
T := (ET eCα
) ×T,α Gm ≃ Gm × eCα.
In addition, the set of all such cα form a µ α-torsor. Consider the following Picard
T (eC/B)+: For any B-scheme S, its S-points form the Picard groupoid of
stack BunW
triples
(3.2.5)
BunW
T (eCS)+ := (ET , γ, cα, α ∈ Φ),
where (ET , γ) is a strongly W-equivariant T -torsor on eCS, and cα : (ET eCα
) ×T,α
Gm ≃ Gm × eCα is a trivialization, which induces (3.2.3) and is compatible with
the W-equivariant structure. We call those trivializations {cα}α∈Φ a +-structure on
(ET , γ). Note that, by Lemma 3.1.2, we have the following short exact sequence of
Picard stacks
(3.2.6)
1 → (Y
α∈Φ
Res eCα/B(µ α × eCα))W → BunW
T (eC/B)+ → P 1 → 1.
Lemma 3.2.1. [DG, Proposition 16.4] We have P ≃ BunW
T (eC/B)+.
Proof. Indeed, the exact sequence (3.2.1) implies that, for any J-torsor EJ ∈ P
T (eC/B) carries a canonical +-structure. This defines a
the image j(EJ ) ∈ BunW
T (eC/B)+ and one can check that it is compatible with the
morphism P → BunW
short exact sequences (3.2.2) and (3.2.6). The lemma follows.
(cid:3)
15
Here is an application of the above discussion. Observe there is the norm map
Nm : BunT (eC/B) → BunW
T (eC/B), ET 7→ ( O
w∈W
w(ET ), γcan).
We claim that Nm admits a canonical lifting
(3.2.7)
NmP : BunT (eC/B) → P.
To show this, we need to exhibit a canonical trivialization
cα : O
w∈W
w(ET ) eCα
×T,α Gm ≃ Gm × eCα.
compatible with the strongly W-equivariant structure. However, for any T -torsor
ET , there is a canonical isomorphism (ET eCα
and therefore, we obtain cα by writing
×T,α Gm ≃ O
) ×T,α Gm ≃ Gm × eCα,
⊗ sα(ET ) eCα
) ×T,α Gm,
O
⊗ sαw(ET ) eCα
(w(ET ) eCα
w(ET ) eCα
w∈W
w∈sα\W
where sα \ W denotes the quotient of W by the subgroup generated by sα. The
compatibility of the collection {cα} with the W-equivariant structure is clear.
3.3. Galois description of P-torsors. The above description of P in terms of
BunW
to (3.1.2), we define
T (eC/B) can be generalized as follows. Let D be a J-gerbe on C × B. Similar
DT := (π∗D)j1
as the T -gerbe on eC induced from D using maps π : eC → C ×B and j1 : π∗J → T × eC
(see A.5 and A.6 for the notion of gerbes and functors between them). Since the
map j1 is W-equivariant the gerbe DT is strongly W-equivariant. Equivalently, this
means that DT descends to a T-gerbe on [eC/W].
Let TD be the stack of splittings of D over B. By definition, for every S → B,
TD (S) is the groupoid of the splittings of the gerbe DC×S. This is a (pseudo)
P-torsor. On the other hand, let T W
denote the stack of strongly W-equivariant
DT
splittings of DT , i.e., T W
(S) is the groupoid of the splittings of DT [ eC/W]×B S. Our
DT
goal is to give a description of TD in terms of T W
DT
T and E α◦α
Let α ∈ Φ. Similar to Eα
as defined in (3.2.3) and (3.2.4), let D α
T ,
denote the restrictions to eCα of the Gm- and T -gerbes on eC induced from DT
D α◦α
using the maps α : T → Gm and α ◦ α : T → T respectively. The strongly W-
equivariant structure on DT implies that the T -gerbe D α◦α
has a canonical splitting
F 0
α. Moreover, by a similar argument in §3.2, one can show that: (i) there is a
canonical splitting E0
α via the canonical map
D α
and (ii) for any strongly W-equivariant splitting (E, γ) of DT there is
a canonical isomorphism of splittings
α of the Gm-gerbe D α
T , which induces F 0
T → D α◦α
T
T
T
T
.
(3.3.1)
where E α◦α is the splitting of D α◦α
We define T W,+
T
DT
as the stack over B whose S-points consist of
≃ F 0
α,
E α◦α eCα
induces by E via the canonical map D α
T → D α◦α
T
.
T W,+
DT
(S) := (E, γ, tα, α ∈ Φ),
16
where (E, γ) is a strongly W-equivariant splittings of DT and
tα : Eα eCα
≃ E0
α
is an isomorphism of splittings of D α
the W-equivariant structure. It is clear that T W,+
T , which induces (3.3.1) and is compatible with
T (eC/B)+-torsor.
is a P = BunW
DT
Lemma 3.3.1. There is a canonial isomorphism of P-torsors TD ≃ T W,+
.
DT
Proof. Let E ∈ TD be a splitting of D. Then ET := (π∗(E))j1
defines a splitting of
DT . Since both maps j1 and π are W-equivariant the splitting ET has a canonial
W-equivariant structure, which we denote by γ. Moreover, by the same reasoning
as in §3.2, there is a canonical isomorphism of splittings tα : Eα
α such that
the induced isomorphism E α◦α
α is equal to the one coming form
the W-equivariant structure γ. The assignment E → (ET , γ, tα, α ∈ Φ) defines a
morphism TD → T W,+
, which is compatible with their P-torsor structures and
hence is an isomorphism.
(cid:3)
α)α ≃ F 0
≃ (E0
≃ E0
T eCα
eCα
DT
T
3.4. The Abel-Jacobi map. From now on till the end of this section, we restrict
to the open subset B0 of the Hitchin base. To simplify the notations, we use B to
denote B0 unless specified. Recall from Proposition 2.6.1 that the cameral curve eC
is smooth over B0.
Let
be the Abel-Jacobi map given by (x, λ) 7→ O(λx) := O(x) ×Gm,λ T . By composition
with NmP , we obtain a morphism
AJ : eC × X•(T ) → BunT (eC/B)
AJP : eC × X•(T ) → P.
It is W-equivariant, where W acts on eC × X•(T ) diagonally and on P trivially, and
is commutative and multiplicative with respect to the group structures on X•(T )
and on P. Observe that for any x ∈ eCα, AJP (x, α) is the unit in P. This follows
from
O
wO(αx) ≃ O
wO(αx + sα(α)x)
w∈W
w∈W/sα
is canonically trivialized, and the trivialization is compatible with the W-equivariant
structure. Here as before W/sα is the quotient of W by the subgroup generated by
sα.
By pulling back the line bundles, we thus obtain
(AJP )∨ : P ∨ → Pic m(eC × X•(T ))W,
where Pic m(eC × X•(T ))W denotes the Picard stack over B of W-equivariant line
bundles on eC × X•(T ) which are multiplicative with respect to X•(T ). Observe
(eC/B) → Pic m(eC × X•(T ))W given
that there is the canonical isomorphism BunW
T
x. Therefore, we can regard (AJP )∨ as a
by (E T , γ) 7→ L, where L(x,λ) = Eλ
T
morphism
(eC/B).
We claim that (AJP)∨ canonically lifts to a morphism
(AJP )∨ : P ∨ → BunW
T
Dcl : P ∨ → P.
17
Let L be a multiplicative line bundle on P. We thus need to show that
(AJP )∗L( eCα, α)
admits a canonical trivialization, which is compatible with the W-equivariance struc-
ture. However, this follows from AJP((x, α)) is the unit of P and a multiplicative
line bundle on P is canonically trivialized over the unit. To summarize, we have
constructed the following commutative diagram
(3.4.1)
P ∨
Dcl
P
"❋❋❋❋❋❋❋❋❋
(AJP)∨
}③③③③③③③③③
j
BunW
T
Now, the classical duality theorem reads as
Theorem 3.4.1. Dcl is an isomorphism.
The proof of this theorem occupies §3.5- §3.7 below.
3.5. First reductions. We first show that Dcl induces an isomorphism
π0(Dcl) : π0(P ∨) → π0( P).
For any S-point b ∈ B0, Pb is a Beilinson 1-motive (Appendix B). We have
Aut(e) ≃ H0(C, Jb),
π0(Pb) = Pb/W1Pb.
Observe that
H0(C, Jb) ≃ ker(T W → (Y
α∈Φ
Res eCα/b(µ α × eCα))W) = Z(G).
By Corollary A.4.3
π0(P ∨) ≃ (AutP (e))∗.
Let us also recall the description of π0(P) as given in [N2, §4.10, §5.5]. As we
restrict P to B0, the answer is very simple. Namely, the Abel-Jacobi map
induces a surjective map
AJP : eC × X•(T ) → P
which induces
π0(eC × X•(T )) ≃ X•(T ) ։ π0(P).
π0(P)∗ ≃ Z( G) ⊂ T W.
Therefore, as abstract groups π0(P ∨) ≃ π0( P).
Since π0(P ∨) ≃ π0( P) are finitely generated abelian groups and are isomorphic
abstractly, to show that π0(Dcl) is an isomorphism, it is enough to show that
Lemma 3.5.1. The induced map π0(Dcl) is surjective.
18
/
/
"
}
Proof. According to the above description, it is enough to construct a morphism
eC × X•(T ) → P ∨ making the following diagram is commutative.
ytttttttttt
Dcl
P ∨
eC × X•(T )
P
AJ
$❏❏❏❏❏❏❏❏❏❏
/ P.
To this goal, observe that there is the universal line bundle Luniv on (eC × X•(T )) ×
BunT . Then the pullback of this line bundle to (eC × X•(T )) × P gives rise to the
desired map. The commutativity of this diagram is an easy exercise.
(cid:3)
Next, we see that
W0(Dcl) : W0P ∨ → W0 P
:
P : eC × X•(T ) → P, and therefore
P ∨ → P. By the same argument, it induces an isomorphism π0( Dcl) :
cl, and therefore W0(Dcl) is also
is an isomorphism. Indeed, we can construct AJ
Dcl
π0( P ∨) → π0(P). It is easy to check that Dcl = D∨
an isomorphism.
Therefore, it is enough to show that Dcl : P ∨ → P is an isomorphism, where P
(resp. P ) is the neutral connected component of the coarse moduli space of P (resp.
P), and Dcl is the map induced by Dcl. We can prove this fiberwise, and therefore
we fix b ∈ B(k). However, to simplify the notation, in the following discussion we
write eC, P instead of eCb, Pb, etc.
3.6. The calculation of the coarse moduli. We introduce a few more notations.
Let P 0 be the Picard stack of J 0-torsors on C, and let P 0 (resp. P 1) be the neutral
connected components of the coarse moduli space of P 0 (resp. P 1).
is the neutral connected component of the coarse moduli space of BunT .
We first understand P 1. Let Jac denote the Jacobi variety of eC. Then Jac ⊗X•
Lemma 3.6.1. The map P 1 → Jac ⊗X• is an embedding, and P 1 can be identified
with (Jac ⊗X•)W,0, the neutral connected component of the W-fixed point subscheme
of Jac ⊗X•.
Proof. We first show that P 1 → Jac ⊗X• is injective at the level of k-points. Indeed,
up to isomorphism, the strongly W-equivariant structures on a trivializable T -torsor
on eC are classified by H1(W, T (k)). By Lemma 3.1.2, the kernel of P 1 → Jac ⊗X•
can be identified with the kernel of the natural map
H1(W, T (k)) → M
eCα
Tα(eCα).
Therefore, it is enough to show that this latter map is injective. Over B0, eCα is
nonempty for every root α.3 Then the injectivity is a consequence of the following
lemma applied to M = T (k).
3Indeed, the same argument in Remark 2.6.2, with the discriminant function Disc replaced by
the W-invariant function Qβ∈Wα dβ : t → k, shows that the fixed point eCα is nonempty.
19
y
$
/
Lemma 3.6.2. Let M be a W-module satisfying the following condition: for some
(and therefore any) choice of a set of simple roots {α1, . . . , αl}, the natural map
M →
lY
(1 − sαi)M, m 7→ ((1 − sα1)m, · · · , (1 − sαl)m)
i=1
is surjective. Then the natural map
H1(W, M ) → Y
1≤i≤s
M/(1 − sβi)M,
[c] 7→ Y
1≤i≤s
(c(sβi) mod (1 − sβi)M )
is injective for any choice of a set {β1, . . . , βs} ⊂ Φ of representatives of Φ/W.
Proof. Let c : W → M be a cocycle.
It follows from the cocycle condition that
if c(sβi) ∈ (1 − sβi)M , then c(sw(βi)) ∈ (1 − sw(βi))M . Therefore, a class [c] is in
the kernel of the map in the lemma only if c(sαi) ∈ (1 − sαi)M for a set of simple
roots {α1, . . . , αl}. But by our assumption of M , there exists m ∈ M such that
c(sαi) = (1 − sαi)m for all 1 ≤ i ≤ l. Then using the cocycle condition, one can
show by induction on the length of w that c(w) = (1 − w)m for every w ∈ W. But
this means that c is a coboundary.
(cid:3)
To complete the proof, observe that the restriction of the norm map
Nm : Jac ⊗X• → P → P 1 → (Jac ⊗X•)W
to Nm : (Jac ⊗X•)W → (Jac ⊗X•)W is the multiplication by W. Therefore, the
image of P 1 → Jac ⊗X• is (Jac ⊗X•)W,0.
In addition, P 1 → (Jac ⊗X•)W,0 is a
prime-to-p isogeny and therefore its kernel is ´etale. Then this kernel must be trivial
since its underlying group of k-points is trivial.
(cid:3)
As a result, for any prime ℓ 6= p,
TℓP 1 ≃ (H1(eC, Zℓ(1)) ⊗ X•)W.
In addition, observe that from the definition of Dcl, the map P 1 ⊂ Jac ⊗X•
factors as
Nm
→ P 1
P 1 ⊂ Jac ⊗X• ≃ (Jac ⊗X•)∨ → ( P 1)∨ → P ∨
Dcl→ P → P 1.
Therefore Dcl is a prime-to-p isogeny. In addition, the map
TℓNm : Tℓ(Jac ⊗X•) ։ Tℓ( P 1)∨ ֒→ TℓP 1
can be identified with
Nm : H1(eC, Zℓ(1))⊗ X• ։ (H1(eC, Zℓ(1))⊗ X•)W/(torsion) ֒→ (H1(eC, Zℓ(1))⊗ X•)W.
On the other hand, as J 0 is connected, the norm map Nm : π∗T → J 1 = (π∗T )W
factors as π∗T → J 0 → J 1. Therefore, Nm : Jac ⊗X• → P 1 also factors as
Nm : Jac ⊗X• → P 0 → P 1.
It follows that P 0 → P 1 is also a prime-to-p isogeny, and for ℓ 6= p there is a
factorization
Nm : H1(eC, Zℓ(1)) ⊗ X• → TℓP 0 ֒→ (H1(eC, Zℓ(1)) ⊗ X•)W.
We need the following key result.
20
Proposition 3.6.3. The two isogenies ( P 1)∨ → P 1 ← P 0 induce an isomorphism
( P 1)∨ ≃ P 0.
Proof. By the above considerations, the lemma is equivalent to saying that the
induced map of Tate modules TℓNm : Tℓ(Jac ⊗X•) → TℓP 0 is surjective for every
ℓ 6= p.
Note that we have the following commutative diagram
(Jac ⊗X•)[ℓn] = H1(C, π∗(X• ⊗ µℓn))
P 0[ℓn]
H1(C, J 0[ℓn])
/ H1(C, J 0)[ℓn],
where the left vertical arrow is induced by π∗T [ℓn] = π∗(X• ⊗ µℓn) → J 0[ℓn], and the
bottom row is induced by the Kummer sequence for J 0 and therefore is surjective.
Since π0(P 0) = H 1(C, J 0)/P 0 is finitely generated, passing to the inverse limit gives
lim←−nH1(C, π∗(X• ⊗ µℓn))
TℓP 0
≃
lim←−nH1(C, J 0[ℓn])
/ lim←−nH1(C, J 0)[ℓn],
where the bottom arrow is surjective. So it is enough to show that the left vertical
arrow is also surjective.
Let y ∈ C, and choose a point y ∈ eC lying over y. Let Wy ⊂ W denote the
stabilizer of y under the action of W on eC. Note that Wy = hsαi if y ∈ eCα and is
trivial otherwise. Then the inclusion of J 0[ℓn] ⊂ J 1[ℓn] at y can be identified as
(3.6.1)
J 0[ℓn]y ≃ T Wy,0[ℓn] = X
Wy
• ⊗ µℓn ⊂ J 1[ℓn]y ≃ T Wy [ℓn] = (X• ⊗ µℓn)Wy .
Therefore, the cokernel of the inclusion J 0[ℓn] ⊂ J 1[ℓn] = π∗(X• ⊗ µℓn)W is a sheaf
supported on the ramification loci of π : eC → C, and whose stalk at y can be
identified with H1(Wy, X•)[ℓn] ⊗ µℓn. Since H1(Wy, X•) is a finite group, passing to
the inverse limit gives
lim←−n H1(C, J 0[ℓn]) ≃ lim←−nH1(C, π∗(X• ⊗ µℓn)W).
Therefore, it is enough to show that the inverse limit of the system of maps
Nm : H1(C, π∗(X• ⊗ µℓn)) → H1(C, π∗(X• ⊗ µℓn)W)
is surjective.
Let j : U ⊂ C be the complement of the ramification loci of π : eC → C and let
j : eU → eC be its preimage in eC. Let i : C \ U → C be the closed embedding of
ramification loci. Then Ln := π∗(X• ⊗ µℓn)U is a locally free Z/ℓn-module on U
with an action of W, and the norm map Nm : Ln → LW
n is surjective. Let Fn denote
its kernel. Note that since j∗(X• ⊗ µℓn) = X• ⊗ µℓn, we have
π∗(X• ⊗ µℓn) = j∗Ln,
π∗(X• ⊗ µℓn)W = j∗LW
n .
Now, let Nn = i∗j∗LW
Taking cohomology of 0 → j!LW
n be the restriction of j∗LW
n over the ramification loci.
n → j∗LW
n → Nn → 0 then induces the following
21
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
commutative diagram with rows and columns exact
H1
c(U, Ln)
H1(C, π∗(X• ⊗ µℓn))
/ 0
.
Nm
Nm
H0(C, Nn)
∂n /
/ H1
c(U, LW
n )
H1(C, π∗(X• ⊗ µℓn)W)
H0(C, Nn)
δn
qn
/ ∆n
0
/ Qn
0
0
0
Here ∆n and Qn denote the cokernels of the norm maps. Recall that we want to
show lim←−Qn = 0. From this diagram, this is equivalent to the surjectivity of lim←−nδn.
It is easier to first describe the Pontrjagin dual of ∂n and qn. Note that the
n [1] → is the Verdier dual of the
n [1] → j∗LW
n → j!LW
distinguished triangle i∗j∗LW
natural distinguished triangle
j∗((LW
n )∗ ⊗ µℓn)[1] → Rj∗((LW
n )∗ ⊗ µℓn)[1] → R1j∗((LW
n )∗ ⊗ µℓn) → .
Therefore, the dual of ∂n is the natural restriction map
H1(SpecOh
n )∗ ⊗ µℓn) → M
res : H1(U, (LW
(3.6.2)
C,y \ {y}, (LW
n )∗ ⊗ µℓn),
y∈C−U
where Oh
C,y denotes the henselization of OC,y.
Let ¯η denote a geometric generic point of eU .
denoted by ¯η. Then we have
Its image in U under π is still
and the monodromy representation ρ : π1(U, ¯η) → GL((Ln)¯η) is given by
(Ln)¯η ≃ Z[W] ⊗ (X• ⊗ µℓn),
ρ(γ)(a ⊗ b) = ρ(γ)a ⊗ b.
There is another action of W on (Ln)¯η given by
w(a ⊗ b) = aw−1 ⊗ wb,
which gives rise to the W-action on Ln. Then there is a canonical isomorphism
(3.6.3)
w ⊗ w−1λ.
X• ⊗ µℓn ≃ (LW
n )¯η, λ 7→ X
Now we have the following commutative diagram
w∈W
((Ln)∗
¯η ⊗ µℓn)W
/ ((Fn)∗
¯η ⊗ µℓn)W
/ H1(W, X•/ℓn)
0
ρ∗
((Ln)∗
¯η ⊗ µℓn)π1(U,¯η)
/ ((Fn)∗
¯η ⊗ µℓn)π1(U,¯η)
/ H1(π1(U, ¯η), X•/ℓn)
/ H1(π1(U, ¯η), (Ln)∗
¯η ⊗ µℓn),
where the second row is the long exact sequence of ´etale cohomology for locally free
Z/ℓn-modules 0 → (LW
n ⊗ µℓn → 0 on U , and the first row
is the long exact sequence of the group cohomology for their stalks at ¯η, regarded
as W-modules. Here, we use: (i) H1(W, (Ln)∗
¯η) = 0 by Shapiro's lemma; (ii) under
n )∗ ⊗ µℓn → L∗
n ⊗ µℓn → F ∗
22
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
_
/
/
/
the isomorphism (3.6.3), the π1(U, ¯η)-action on (LW
n )¯η corresponds to the natural
action of W = ρ(π1(U, ¯η)) on X• ⊗ µℓn; (iii) ρ∗ is injective since it is induced by the
surjective map π1(U, ¯η) → W. Therefore, it follows from the Poincar´e duality on U
that the Pontrjagin dual of qn is ρ∗.
Putting together, the dual of δn is res ◦ ρ∗. Now we choose a geometric generic
C,y \ {y}), ¯ηy) = hsαy i ⊂ W for
point ¯ηy of SpecOh
some root αy (depending on ¯ηy), and there is the following commutative diagram
C,y \ {y} over ¯η. Then ρ(π1(SpecOh
H1(W, X•/ℓn)
ρ∗
H1(hsαy i, X•/ℓn)
ρ∗
res
+❳❳❳❳❳❳❳❳❳❳❳❳❳❳❳❳❳❳❳❳❳❳❳❳
δ∗
n
res
H1(π1(U, ¯η), X•/ℓn)
/ H1(π1(SpecOh
C,y \ {y}, ¯ηy), X•/ℓn),
with vertical arrows injective. Therefore, it remains to show that
lim←−H1(hsαy i, X•/ℓn)∗ → lim←−H1(W, X•/ℓn)∗
M
y∈C−U
is surjective. Note
(3.6.4)
lim←−nH1(W, X•/ℓn)∗ = Hom(lim−→n H1(W,
1
ℓn X•/X•), Qℓ/Zℓ).
Using 0 → H1(W, X•)/ℓn → H1(W, X•/ℓn) → H2(W, X•)[ℓn] → 0, and the fact that
H1(W, X•) is finite, we have
lim−→n H1(W,
1
ℓn X•/X•) = H2(W, X•)[ℓ∞] = H1(W, X• ⊗ Qℓ/Zℓ).
So it reduces to show that
H1(W, X• ⊗ Qℓ/Zℓ) → M
H1(hsαy i, X• ⊗ Qℓ/Zℓ)
y∈C−U
is injective. As mentioned in the proof of Lemma 3.6.1, eCα is non-empty for every
α ∈ Φ. So {αy} contain a set of representatives of Φ/W. Now we can apply Lemma
3.6.2 to M = X• ⊗ Qℓ/Zℓ to finish the proof of the proposition.
(cid:3)
Now, let A′ = ker(P 0 → P ), and A = ker(P → P 1). Then by the above proposi-
tion,
ker Dcl = A′/( A)∗.
As both A′ and A are finite ´etale groups, it is enough to show that A′ = A, where
for a finite group Γ, Γ denotes the number of its elements. This is the subject of
the next subsection.
3.7. Calculation of finite groups. Let us understand A. In fact, it is better to
pick up ∞ ∈ C away from the ramification loci. Let O∞ denote the completed local
ring of C at ∞. Let J∞ be the dilatation of J along the unit of the fiber of J at
∞. By definition (see [BLR, §2] for details), J∞ is the unique smooth group scheme
over C equipped with a natural map J∞ → J, which is an isomorphism away from
∞ and induces an isomorphism from J∞(O∞) to the first congruence subgroup of
J(O∞). Let P∞ be the Picard stack of J∞-torsors on C. One can also interpret P∞
as the Picard stack of J-torsors on C together with a trivialization at ∞. Observe
that P∞ is in fact a scheme. Let P∞ denote the neutral connected component of
23
/
/
_
+
_
/
P∞. Similarly, one can define J 0
A′
∞ = ker(P 0
∞ → P∞).
∞, J 1
∞, P 0
∞, P 1
∞ etc. Let A∞ = ker(P∞ → P 1
∞) and
Lemma 3.7.1. There are the following two exact sequences
1 → A∞ → Γ(C, J 1/J) → π0(P) → π0(P 1) → 1
and
Similarly,
and
Proof. Consider
1 → AutP (e) → AutP1 (e) → A∞ → A → 1.
1 → A′
∞ → Γ(C, J/J 0) → π0(P 0) → π0(P) → 1
1 → AutP0(e) → AutP (e) → A′
∞ → A′ → 1.
1 −−−−→ J∞ −−−−→ J 1
∞ −−−−→ J 1
∞/J∞ −−−−→ 1
y
y
y
1 −−−−→ J −−−−→ J 1 −−−−→ J 1/J −−−−→ 1.
Taking RΓ(C, −), we obtain
(3.7.1)
1 −−−−→ Γ(C, J 1
∞/J∞) −−−−→ P∞ −−−−→ P 1
∞ −−−−→ 1
y
y
y
1 −−−−→ Γ(C, J 1/J) −−−−→ P −−−−→ P 1 −−−−→ 1.
Since P∞ and P 1
∞ are schemes, the first row of (3.7.1) gives
∞/J∞) → π0(P∞) → π0(P 1
1 → A∞ → Γ(C, J 1
∞) → 1.
∞/J∞ = J 1/J and π0(P∞) = π0(P), π0(P 1
∞) = π0(P 1), we obtain the
Since J 1
first exact sequence of the lemma. In addition, combining with the second row of
(3.7.1), we obtain the short exact sequence of Beilinson's 1-motives
1 → A∞ → W1P → W1P 1 → 1,
which in turn gives the second exact sequence of the lemma. The proof of the last
two exact sequences of the lemma is similar (by considering RΓ of the short exact
sequence 1 → J 0
(cid:3)
∞ → J∞ → J∞/J 0
∞ → 1).
As a corollary, we can write
and
A =
A′ =
coker(AutP (e) → AutP1(e)) ker(π0(P) → π0(P 1)
Γ(C, J 1/J)
.
coker(AutP0 (e) → AutP (e)) ker(π0(P 0) → π0(P))
(Γ(C, J/J 0)
.
Therefore to show that A = A′, it is enough to show that
(1) Γ(C, J 1/ J) = Γ(C, J/J 0);
(2) coker(Aut P (e) → Aut P1 (e)) = coker(π0(P)∗ → π0(P 0)∗);
(3) ker(π0( P) → π0( P 1)) = ker(AutP(e)∗ → AutP0 (e)∗).
24
We first prove (1). By (3.2.1),
(3.7.2)
Γ(C, J 1/ J ) = (M
α
µα(eCα))W.
Observe that µα 6= 0 if and only if α is not a primitive root, i.e. α/2 ∈ X•. On the
other hand, from
one can see that the character group of Γ(C, J/J0) is (Lx∈⊔ eCα
Qα∩X•
Zα )W. Then (1)
1 → J/J0 → J1/J0 → J1/J → 1,
follows.
Next, we prove (2). In fact, it follows from §3.5 and [N2, §4.10] that both maps
can be identified with the natural inclusion Z( G) → T W.
Finally, we show (3). Recall that AutP(e) = {t ∈ T α(t) = 1, α ∈ Φ}. On the
other hand, from the above description of Γ(C, J/J0)∗,
AutP0(e) = {t ∈ T λ(t) = 1 if λ ∈ Qα ∩ X•, α ∈ Φ)}.
Therefore,
ker(AutP(e)∗ → AutP0 (e)∗) = Pα∈Φ(Qα ∩ X•)
ZΦ
.
To calculate ker(π0( P) → π0( P 1)), we choose y ∈ eCαy above y ∈ C − U for
every point in the ramification loci. The restriction of 1 → J → J 1 → J 1/ J → 0 at
y then can be identified with
1 → ker(αy) → T sαy
αy→ µαy ≃
Qαy ∩ X•
Zαy
→ 1.
It follows that the coboundary map Γ(C, J 1/ J) → H1(C, J ) can be identified with
M
y∈C−U
Qαy ∩ X•
Zαy
→ H1(C, J ),
λy ∈
Qαy ∩ X•
Zαy
7→ AJ
P (y, λy),
P is the Abel-Jacobi map introduced before. Of course, this map does
P(y, λy) =
where AJ
not really depend on the choice of liftings of y ∈ C − U since AJ
AJ
P (wy, wλy).
Now, as in the proof of Lemma 3.7.1, we have a right exact sequence
Γ(C, J 1/ J ) → π0( P) → π0( P 1) → 0.
Since the Abel-Jacobi map induces X•
ZΦ ≃ π0( P), we deduce that
ker(π0( P) → π0( P 1)) = Im(Γ(C, J 1/ J ) → π0( P)) = Pα∈Φ(Qα ∩ X•)
.
ZΦ
Therefore, (3) follows and the proof of Theorem 3.4.1 is complete.
Remark 3.7.2. As a byproduct of the proof, we obtain
π0( P 1) =
X•
Pα∈Φ(Qα ∩ X•)
.
It seems that this expression of π0( P 1) did not appear in literature before.
25
3.8. A property of Dcl. In this subsection, we assume that G is semisimple. We
show that the classical duality Dcl intertwines certain homomorphisms of Picard
stacks over the Hitchin base B0. As before, we omit the subscript 0.
Let Z( G) -tors(C) denote the Picard stack of Z( G)-torsors on C. We start with
the construction of two homomorphisms
(3.8.1)
lJ : Z( G) -tors(C) × B → P ∨,
lJ : Z( G) -tors(C) × B → P.
The definition of lJ is easy. It is induced by the natural map of group schemes
for every b : S → B. For K ∈ Z( G) -tors(C), let
Z( G) × (C × S) → Jb,
KJ := lJ ({K} × B) ∈ P(B).
Next we define lJ . For the purpose, we need to generalize a construction of [BD,
§4.1]. Let π : C → B be a smooth proper relative curve over an affine base B (later
on C = C × B). Let
0 → Π(1) → G → G → 0
be an extension of smooth affine group schemes on C with Π commutative finite
´etale. Let Π∨ = Hom(Π, Gm) be its Cartier dual, which is assumed to be ´etale as
well (in particular, the order of Π is prime to char k), and let Π∨ -tors(C/B) denote
the Picard stack (over B) of Π∨-torsors on C relative to B. We construct a Picard
functor
lG : Π∨ -tors(C/B) → Pic (BunG(C/B))
of Picard stacks over B as follows. First, let Π -gerbes(C/B) denote the Picard 2-
stack of Π-gerbes on C relative to B, regarded as a Picard stack. Then there is the
generalized (or categorical) Chern class map
cG : BunG(C/B) → Π(1) -gerbes(C/B)
that assigns every B-scheme S and a G-torsor E on CS, the Picard groupoid of the
lifting of E to a G-torsor. We have
Lemma 3.8.1. The dual of the Picard stack Π -gerbes(C/B) (as defined in §A.3) is
canonically isomorphic to Π∨ -tors(C/B).
We follow [BD, §4.1.5] for a "scientific interpretation" of this lemma and refer to
[BD, §4.1.2-4.1.4] for the precise construction. As explained in §A.1, the Picard stack
Π -gerbes(C/B) is incarnated by the complex τ≥−1Rπ∗Π[2](1), and Π∨ -tors(C/B) is
incarnated by the complex τ≤0Rπ∗Π∨[1]. Let µ′
∞ denote the group of prime-to-p
roots of unit. Note that π!µ′
∞ ≃ µ′
RHom(Rπ∗Π[2](1), µ′
∞[2](1). Then by the Verdier duality,
∞) ≃ Rπ∗Π∨.
∞) ≃ Rπ∗RHom(Π[2](1), π!µ′
By shifting by [1] and truncating τ≤0, one obtains the lemma. As explained in [BD,
§4.1.5], working in the framework of derived categories is in not enough to turn
the above heuristics into a proof. One can either give a concrete construction as
in [BD, §4.1.2-4.1.4] or understand the above argument in the framework of stable
∞-categories.
Therefore, each K ∈ Π∨ -tors(C/B) defines a morphism
lG,K : BunG(C/B)
cG→ Π(1) -gerbes(C/B)
<,K>
→ BGm
26
or equivalently a line bundle LG,K on BunG(C/B) and the assignment K → LG,K
defines a homomorphism of Picard stacks
lG : Π∨ -tors(C/B) → Pic(BunG(C/B)),
which factors through the n-torsion of Pic(BunG)(C/B) where n is the order of Π∨.
Note that in the above discussion we do not assume that G is commutative. But
if G is commutative, BunG(C/B) has a natural structure of Picard stack over B
and one can check that lG factors through a homomorphism lG : Π∨ -tors(C/B) →
(BunG(C/B))∨.
Now let C = C × B, where B is the Hitchin base as before. Let G = Jb and
G = (Jsc)b, where b : B → B is the identity map, and Jsc is the universal regular
centralizer for Gsc, the simply-connected cover of G. Then Π(1) = ΠG(1) is the fun-
G is canonical isomorphic to the center Z( G) of G. Therefore,
damental group and Π∨
the above construction gives lJ as promised in (3.8.1).
Note that similarly we can set G = G × C and G = T × C in the above construction
so we obtain
lG : Z( G) -tors(C) → Pic(BunG),
lT : Z( G) -tors(C) → (BunT )∨.
For K ∈ Z( G) -tors(C), let LG,K := lG(K) ∈ Pic(BunG), LJ,K := lJ ({K} × B) ∈
(P)∨(B). The following lemma will be used in §5.6.
Lemma 3.8.2. Let κ be a square root of ω. Then the pullback of LG,K along the
κ ◦ pr∗LG,K.
map P
pr
→ BunG is isomorphic to LJ,K, i.e., we have LJ,K ≃ ǫ∗
ǫκ→ Higgs
Proof. It is enough to show that the composition
P
ǫκ→ Higgs
pr
→ BunG
cG→ ΠG(1) -gerbes(C)
is isomorphic to
P
cJ→ ΠG -gerbes(C) × B → ΠG(1) -gerbes(C).
Let P ∈ P and (E, φ) := ǫκ(P ). We need to construct a functorial isomorphism
between cJ (P ) and cG(E) where cJ (P ) (resp. cG(E)) is the ΠG(1)-gerbe of liftings
of P to Jsc-torsors (resp. Gsc-torsors).
Note that the G-torsor Eκ given by the Kostant section has a natural lifting
Eκ ∈ BunGsc, since the cocharacter 2ρ : Gm → G has a natural lifting to Gsc. Thus
any lifting P ∈ cJ (P ) defines a lifting E := P ×Jsc Eκ ∈ BunGsc of E = P ×J Eκ and
the assignment P → E defines a functorial isomorphism between cJ (P ) and cG(E).
The lemma follows.
(cid:3)
We write lG, lT , lJ for the induced maps between the corresponding coarse moduli
spaces. The following lemma is a specialization of our construction of the duality
given in Lemma 3.8.1.
Lemma 3.8.3. Let n be a positive integer such that p ∤ n. Let
l : T [n] -tors(C) → (BunT )∨[n]
n
→ T → 0.4 Then the
be the tensor functor given by the extension 0 → T [n] → T
induced map l : H 1(C, T [n]) → H 1(C, T [n])∨ between the coarse moduli spaces is the
same the as map given by the Poincare duality.
4Recall that we have a canonical isomorphism T [n] ≃ (T [n])∨.
27
Now we are ready to state the result in this subsection.
Proposition 3.8.4. There is a natural isomorphism of functors Dcl ◦ lJ ≃ lJ . In
particular, we have Dcl(LJ,K) ≃ KJ .
Proof. Let Gad denote the adjoint group of G. Note that it is the Langlands dual
group of Gsc. Let Jad be the universal centralizer for Gad, and nad denote the Picard
stack of Jad-torsors. We first claim that the composition
Z( G) -tors(C) × B
lJ→ P ∨ Dcl≃ P → Pad
is trivial. From the construction of Dcl, we have the following commutative diagram
P ∨
Dcl
P
(Psc)∨ Dcl
/ Pad.
Thus above composition can be identified with
Z( G) -tors(C) × B
lJ→ (P)∨ → (Psc)∨ Dcl≃ Pad.
This is trivial since the composition of the first two maps is the dual of
Psc → P
cJ→ ΠG(1) -gerbes(C) × B,
which is trivial by the construction of cJ .
On the other hand, the short exact sequence 0 → Z( G) × B → J → Jad → 0
induces a left exact sequence of Picard stacks
0 → Z( G) -tors(C) × B
lJ→ P → Pad.
I.e., Z( G) -tors(C) × B is identified as the kernel of P → Pad. Therefore, there is
a morphism
i : Z( G) -tors(C) × B → Z( G) -tors(C) × B
such that Dcl◦lJ ≃ lJ ◦i. We now show that i is isomorphic to the identity morphism.
As argued in §3.5, we reduce to show that i induced the identity map on the coarse
moduli space H 1(C, Z( G)) × B.
Let i : H 1(C, Z( G)) × B → H 1(C, Z( G)) × B, lJ : H 1(C, Z( G)) × B → P ∨ and
lJ : H 1(C, Z( G)) × B → P be the induced maps on the corresponding coarse moduli
spaces. Our goal is to show that i = id. Since Γ(C × B, Jad) = 0, lJ is injective.
Therefore, it suffices to show that
lJ ◦ (i − id) : H 1(C, Z( G)) × B → P
is zero. As in §3.5, we can prove this fiberwise, and therefore we fix b ∈ B0(k).
Again, to simplify notations, in the following discussion we write eC, J, P, P instead
of eCb, Jb, Pb, Pb, etc.
Let j1 : P → H 1(eC, T ) be the map induced by the morphism j1 : π∗ J → T .
Then the composition j1 ◦ lJ : H 1(C, Z( G)) → H 1(eC, T ) is also injective (note that
j1 ◦ lJ is induced by the natural map Z( G) → T ). Thus it is enough to show that
j1 ◦ lJ ◦ (i − id) = 0. Since Dcl ◦ lJ = lJ ◦ i, it is equivalent to show that
(3.8.2)
j1 ◦ Dcl ◦ lJ − j1 ◦ lJ = 0.
28
/
/
/
Let us consider the following diagram
H 1(C, Z( G))
id
H 1(C, Z( G))
lJ
lJ
H 1(C, J)∨
Nm∨
/ H 1(eC, T )∨
Dcl
/ H 1(C, J )
j1
/ H 1(eC, T ),
where Nm∨ is the dual of (3.2.7), and the right vertical map is (Jac ⊗X•)∨ ≃
Jac ⊗X•. The right rectangle in the above diagram is commutative by the con-
struction of Dcl in §3. Therefore it is enough to show that the outer diagram is also
commutative.
Let n be the order of Z( G). Then j1 ◦ lJ and Nm∨ ◦lJ will factor through
H 1(eC, T )[n] ≃ H 1(eC, T [n]) and H 1(eC, T )∨[n] ≃ H 1(eC, T [n])∨5. Thus the outer
diagram factors as
H 1(C, Z( G))
Nm∨ ◦lJ/
H 1(eC, T [n])∨
id
H 1(C, Z( G))
j1◦lJ /
/ H 1(eC, T [n]),
where the right vertical arrow is now given by the Poincare duality. Unraveling the
definition of lJ , one sees that Nm∨ ◦ lJ can be identified with
H 1(C, Z( G)) → H 1(eC, T [n]) → H 1(eC, T [n])∨
where the first map is induced by the natural morphism Z( G) → T [n] and the second
map is the map l in Lemma 3.8.3. Then the commutativity of above diagram follows
from Lemma 3.8.3.
(cid:3)
4. Multiplicative 1-forms
In this section, we establish a technical result. Namely, we show that the pullback
of the canonical 1-form θcan on T ∗ BunG along P → T ∗ BunG induced by a Kostant
section κ is multiplicative in the sense of §C.2.
4.1. Lie algebra valued 1-forms. In this subsection, we restrict everything to
B0 and therefore omit the subscript 0 from the notation. Recall that there is a
group scheme T = eC ×W T over [eC/W] and Proposition 2.5.1 says that there is a
homomorphism [j1] : [π]∗J → T where [π] : [eC/W] → C × B is the projection. It
induces the following commutative diagram
[π]∗(ΩC×B ⊗ Lie J) −−−−→ [π]∗(ΩC×B/B ⊗ Lie J)
y
y
Ω[ eC/W ] ⊗ Lie T −−−−→ Ω[ eC/W ]/B ⊗ Lie T
Note that, due to the product structure on C ×B, the arrow in the upper row admits
a canonical splitting. Therefore, the tautological section in (2.7.1)
(τ : B → BJ ) ∈ Γ(C × B, ΩC×B/B ⊗ Lie J)
5Note that p ∤ n.
29
/
/
/
/
/
/
can be regarded as a section of [π]∗(ΩC×B ⊗ Lie J), which in turn gives
(4.1.1)
θ eC ∈ Γ([eC/W], Ω[ eC/W] ⊗ Lie T) = Γ(eC, Ω eC ⊗ t)W.
We denote by θ eC ∈ Γ(eC, Ω eC ⊗ t)W the corresponding section for the dual group.
We shall give an alternative description of θ eC. We denote by
the Gm-twist by ω of the map δ as in Lemma 2.7.3. We regard tω and tω ×C tω (via
the first projection) as schemes over cω and define
δω : tω → tω ×C tω
δ eC : eC = e∗tω → e∗(tω ×C tω) = eC ×C (T ∗C ⊗ t)
to be the base change of δω via the evaluation map e : C ×B → cω. By Lemma 2.7.3,
δ eC is just the pull back of the diagonal map tω → tω ×C tω along e : C × B → cω.
By construction, the section θ eC ∈ Γ(eC, Ω eC ⊗ t)W is equal to the following com-
position
(4.1.2)
eC
δ eC→ eC ×C (T ∗C ⊗ t) → T ∗ eC ⊗ t
where the last map is the cotangent map for the projection eC → C.
The description of θ eC in (4.1.2) implies the following relation between θ eC and θ eC:
Lemma 4.1.1. Let σ : Γ(eC, Ω eC ⊗t)W ≃ Γ(eC, Ω eC ⊗t)W be the canonical isomorphism
induced by the non-degenerate invariant form (, ) on t. We have σ(θ eC ) = θ eC.
Remark 4.1.2. The 1-form θ eC is related to the canonical 1-form ωC of C in the
following way. Let e : eC → T ∗C ⊗ t (= tω) be the natural W-equivariant map (see
§2.4). The natural W-equivariant pairing X• × t → k induces a W-equivariant map
(4.1.3)
ν : eC × X• e×id
→ (T ∗C ⊗ t) × X• → T ∗C,
where W acts diagonally on eC × X•. Now the pull back of the canonical 1-form ωC
on T ∗C along ν defines a section ν∗ωC ∈ Γ(eC, Ω eC ⊗ t)W, and using the description
of θ eC in (4.1.2) one can check that θ eC = ν∗ωC.
4.2. Canonical 1-form. Let us denote by T ∗ Bun0
stack of T ∗ BunG. Then there is a tautological section
G → T ∗(T ∗ Bun0
G the maximal smooth open sub-
θcan : T ∗ Bun0
G).
Note that T ∗ BunG ×BB0 ⊂ T ∗ Bun0
G. From now on, we restriction everything to
the open part B0 and therefore will omit 0 from the subscript. Note that for a choice
of the Kostant section κ, we have an isomorphism ǫκ : P ≃ T ∗ BunG, and therefore
we may regard θcan as a section P → T ∗P, denoted by θκ.
Let AJP : eC × X• → P be the Abel-Jacobi map. Write pull back
(AJP)∗θκ = {θκ,λ}λ∈X• ∈ Γ(eC × X•, Ω eC )W,
where θκ,λ ∈ Γ(eC, Ω eC) is the restriction of (AJP )∗θκ to eC × {λ}. A section
{αλ}λ∈X• ∈ Γ(eC × X•, Ω eC ) (resp. Γ(eC × X•, Ω eC/B)) is called X•-multiplicative if it
satisfies αλ+µ = αλ + αµ, for any λ, µ ∈ X•. Clearly, any X•-multiplicative section
{αλ}λ∈X• corresponds to a t-valued section α ∈ Γ(eC, Ω eC ⊗t) (resp. Γ(eC, Ω eC/B ⊗t)).
The rest of the section is mainly devoted to the proof of the following result.
30
Proposition 4.2.1. The 1-form (AJP )∗θκ is X•-multiplicative. Moreover, if we
regard (AJP)∗θκ as a section of Γ(eC, Ω eC ⊗ t)W we have
(AJP )∗θκ = θ eC.
Where θ eC is the section defined in §4.1.
We have the following corollary. Recall the notion of multiplicative sections P →
T ∗P as defined In §C.2.
Corollary 4.2.2. The section θκ is multiplicative in the sense of §C.2. In addition,
it is independent of the choice of Kostant section κ.
Proof. We first show that θκ is multiplicative. Consider the section
m∗θκ : P ×B P → T ∗P ×P (P ×B P) → T ∗(P ×B P),
where the first map is the base change of θκ along the multiplication m : P ×B P →
P, and the second map is the differential md of m. On the other hand, consider
(θκ, θκ) : P ×B P → (T ∗P × T ∗P)P×B P → T ∗(P ×B P).
We need to show that (θκ, θκ) = m∗θκ.
We first have the following lemma, whose proof is independent of Proposition
4.2.1.
Lemma 4.2.3. The projection of θκ along T ∗P → T ∗(P/B) is multiplicative.
More precisely, the images of m∗θκ and (θκ, θκ) in T ∗(P ×B P/B) are the same.
Proof. Consider the following short exact sequence of vector bundles on P ×B P
0 → T ∗B ×B (P ×B P) → T ∗(P ×B P) → T ∗(P ×B P/B) → 0.
As the projection of θκ along T ∗P → T ∗(P/B) is identified with τ ∗ × id (cf.
Lemma 2.7.2), the restriction of θκ to each fiber Pb is given by the "constant" 1-
form τ ∗b ∈ Γ(C, (Lie Jb)∗ ⊗ ω). Therefore, (θκ, θκ) = m∗θκ in T ∗(P ×B P/B). (cid:3)
Therefore, their difference can be regarded as a section
m∗θκ − (θκ, θκ) ∈ Γ(P ×B P, pr∗ΩB) = (π0(P) × π0(P)) × Γ(B, ΩB).
The Abel-Jacobi map AJP : eC × X• → P induces a map
AJP,2 : eC × X• × X• → P ×B P.
It is enough to show that the pullback of m∗θκ − (θκ, θκ) in
Γ((eC × X• × X•), pr∗ΩB) = (X• × X•) × Γ(B, ΩB)
vanishes. By Proposition 4.2.1, the one form (AJP )∗θκ = {θκ,λ}λ∈X• is X•-multiplicative,
thus for any λ, µ ∈ X• we have
(AJP,2)∗(m∗θκ − (θκ, θκ)) eC×{λ}×{µ} = θκ,λ+µ − (θκ,λ + θκ,µ) = 0.
This finishes the proof of multiplicative property of θκ. The independence of κ
follows from (AJP )∗θκ = θ eC.
(cid:3)
Notation. In what follows, we denote the multiplicative 1-form θκ on P by θm.
31
Remark 4.2.4. Let a := m ◦ (AJP × id) : (eC × X•) ×B P → P ×B P → P be
the action map. Then Remark 4.1.2 together with Corollary 4.2.2 implies that
a∗θm = ν∗(ωC) ⊠ θm.
Here ν is the map in (4.1.3) for the dual group. In the case of G = GLn, (a variant
of) this identity was proved in [BB, Theorem 4.12].
4.3. Proof of Proposition 4.2.1: first reductions. Let θκ and θ eC be the pro-
jections of (AJP )∗θκ and θ eC along
Γ(eC × X•, Ω eC) → Γ(eC × X•, Ω eC/B).
Lemma 4.2.3 implies that θκ is X•-multiplicative and can be regarded as an element
in Γ(eC, Ω eC/B ⊗ t)W. Let us first show that θκ = θ eC.
Recall in (2.7.4) we have introduced a morphism ι : Lie J → (Lie J)∗. It follows
from the definition of ι in loc. cit. that the following diagram is commutative
[π]∗Lie J
[π]∗ι
[π]∗(Lie J)∗
Lie T
/ Lie T,
where the arrow in the bottom row is the morphism Lie T → Lie T induced by the
invariant from (, ) on t. (Recall (cf. §4.1) that T := eC ×W T is a group scheme over
[eC/W ] and [π] : [eC/W ] → C × B.) It induces the following commutative diagram
Γ(C × B, ΩC×B/B ⊗ Lie J)
Γ(C × B, ΩC×B/B ⊗ Lie J ∗)
υ
ι∗
σ
Γ(eC, Ω eC/B ⊗ t)W
/ Γ(eC, Ω eC/B ⊗ t)W
Recall the sections τ ∈ Γ(C ×B, ΩC×B/B⊗Lie J) and τ ∗ ∈ Γ(C ×B, ΩC×B/B ⊗Lie J ∗)
in §2.7. Note the map υ in the diagram above is an isomorphism6 and it identifies
θκ with the section τ ∗. On the other hand, Lemma 4.1.1 implies the section θ eC ∈
Γ(eC, Ω eC/B ⊗t)W is equal to the image of τ under the composition of the morphisms
in the lower left corner of the above diagram. Thus, υ(θ eC ) = ι∗(τ ) = τ ∗. Therefore
both θ eC and θκ map to τ ∗ under the isomorphism υ, which implies θ eC = θκ.
As a consequence, difference θ eC − (AJP )∗θκ can be regarded as a section
(4.3.1)
θ eC − (AJP)∗θκ ∈ Γ(eC × X•, pr∗ΩB).
We need to show that it is zero. Let eU ⊂ eC be the largest open subset such that
eU → C × B is ´etale. It is enough to show that θ eC − (AJP )∗θκ eU ×X•
for x ∈ eU we have a canonical decomposition Tx eC = TxC ⊕ TbB and by (4.3.1) it
suffices to show that (θ eC − (AJP )∗θκ)TbB = 0. As the section θ eC is induced by the
canonical splitting ΩC×B/B ⊗ Lie J → ΩC×B ⊗ Lie J, the restriction of θ eC to TbB is
= 0. Note that
6It is the relative cotangent map of the isogeny P → BunW
T ( eC/B).
32
/
/
/
O
O
/
/
/
O
O
zero, so we reduce to show that (AJP )∗θκTbB = 0, i.e. for any λ ∈ X• and v ∈ TbB
we have
(4.3.2)
hθκ,λ, vi = h(AJP )∗θκ eC×{λ}, vi = 0.
For the later purpose, we introduce some notations. Let (Eκ, φκ) be the Higgs field
on C × B obtained by the pullback along the Kostant section κ. For every λ ∈ X•
let AJP,λ : eC → P denote the corresponding component of the Abel-Jacobi map
and let
(Ex, φx) := AJP,λ(x) ×Jb (Eκ, φκ)C×{b},
be the image of x under the map eC
AJP,λ
→ P
aλ : eC
AJP,λ
ǫκ≃ T ∗ BunG. We also define
→ P
ǫκ≃ T ∗ BunG → BunG .
Since θκ = ǫ∗
κθcan, we have
hθκ,λ, vi = h(AJP,λ)∗ǫ∗
κθcan, vi = hθcan, (ǫκ)∗(AJP,λ)∗vi = hφx, aλ∗vi,
where aλ∗ : Tx eC → TEx BunG ≃ H 1(C, adEx) is the differential of aλ and the last
pairing is induced by the Serre duality H 0(C, adEx ⊗ ΩC) ≃ H 1(C, adEx)∗.
Therefore we reduce to show the following:
Proposition 4.3.1. For any v ∈ TbB ⊂ Tx eC = TxC ⊕ TbB, the pairing hφx, aλ∗vi
is zero.
4.4. Proof of Proposition 4.3.1: calculations of differentials. We shall need
several preliminary steps. Recall that there is the Eκ-twist global Grassmannian
Gr(Eκ) which classify the triples (x, E, β) where x ∈ C, E is a G-torsor and β :
EκC−{x} ≃ EC−{x} is an isomorphism. Given a dominant coweight µ (with respect
to the set of simple roots we choose), it makes sense to talk about the closed substack
Gr≤µ(Eκ), consisting of those β : EκC−{x} ≃ EC−{x} having relative position ≤ µ
[BD, §5.2.2]). Let Grµ(Eκ) = Gr≤µ(Eκ) − Sλ<µ Gr≤λ(Eκ). We have
at x (cf.
natural projection maps
For any x ∈ C, let
BunG
pr1← Gr≤µ(Eκ)
pr2→ C.
Grx(Eκ) := Gr(Eκ) ×C {x},
and similarly we have Grx,≤µ(Eκ), Grx,µ(Eκ).
Note that for any x ∈ eC the J-torsor AJP,λ(x) ∈ P has a canonical trivialization
s over C − x (here x is the image of x in C), thus it induces a canonial isomorphism
β : EκC−x ≃ ExC−x (recall that Ex := AJP,λ(x) ×J Eκ). The assignment x →
(x, Ex, β) defines a morphism aλ : eC → Gr(Eκ). We have the following key lemma:
Lemma 4.4.1. Let µ be a dominant coweight and λ ∈ W · µ. The morphism aλ
factors through Gr≤µ(Eκ) and the following diagram
Gr≤µ(Eκ)
eC
aλ /
#❍❍❍❍❍❍❍❍❍❍
aλ
pr1
BunG
is commutative. Moreover, for any k-point x ∈ eU (k), aλ(x) ∈ Grµ(Eκ)(k).
33
/
#
The proof is given at the end of this subsection. We also need the following lemma
about the differential of aλ.
Lemma 4.4.2. Let x ∈ eU (k), and let aλ(x) = (x, Ex, β) ∈ Grµ(Eκ)(k) (by Lemma
4.4.1). For every v ∈ TbB ⊂ Tx eC = TxC ⊕ TbB, we have
u := (aλ)∗v ∈ T(Ex,β)Grx,µ(Eκ) ⊂ T(x,Ex,β)Grµ(Eκ).
Proof. The subspace T(Ex,β)Grx,µ(Eκ) ⊂ T(x,Ex,β)Grµ(Eκ) is equal to
Ker((pr2)∗ : T(x,Ex,β)Grµ(Eκ) → TxC).
Therefore it is enough to show (pr2)∗(aλ)∗v = 0. Recall that we have the following
commutative diagram (not cartesian)
eC
π
aλ
Gr≤µ(Eκ)
.
pr2
C × B
prC
/ C
Thus we have (pr2)∗(aλ)∗v = (prC)∗(π∗v) = (prC)∗v = 0. This finishes the proof.
(cid:3)
Combining the above two lemmas we obtain that
(4.4.1)
hθκ,λ, vi = hφx, aλ∗vi = hφx, (pr1)∗ui
where u := (aλ)∗v ∈ T(Ex,β)Grx,µ(Eκ). So we need show that the last pairing is zero.
To calculate it, we need a few more notations. For any x ∈ C we denote by Ox the
completion of the local ring of C at x and Fx its fractional field. Let ωOx (resp. ωFx)
denote the completed regular (resp. rational) differentials on SpecOx. We denote
by
Res(, ) : g(ωFx) × g(Fx) → k
the residue pairing induced by the G-invariant form (, ) on g.
Let us fix a trivialization γκ : Eκ ≃ E0 on SpecOx. Then, for every trivialization
γ of E on SpecOx, we obtain
g = γ−1
κ βγ ∈ G(Fx).
In this way, γκ induces an isomorphism
Grx,µ(Eκ) ≃ Orbµ,
(E, β) 7→ γ−1
κ βγG(Ox),
where Orbµ is the G(Ox)-orbit of µ·G(Ox) ∈ G(Fx)/G(Ox). Under the isomorphism,
we have the identification of the tangent spaces
T(E,β)Grx,µ(Eκ) ≃ g(Ox)/(Adg g(Ox) ∩ g(Ox)).
For any u ∈ T(E,β)Grx,µ(Eκ) and φ ∈ TE BunG the pairing hφ, (pr1)∗ui can be
calculated as follows. Let u ∈ g(Ox) be a lifting of u under the above isomorphism.
Let φ(γ) denote the φ : SpecOx → adE ⊗ ωC
γ
→ g(ωFx). Now we have
hφ, (pr1)∗ui = Res(φ(γ), Ad−1
g u),
In our case φ = φx = AJP,λ(x) ×J φκ, the following lemma will imply the vanishing
of hφx, (pr1)∗ui, and therefore will finish the proof of Proposition 4.3.1.
Lemma 4.4.3. We have Adg φx(γ) ∈ g(ωOx).
34
/
/
/
Proof. Indeed, unraveling the definitions, we have Adg φ(γ) = φκ(γκ), which is reg-
ular.
(cid:3)
It remains to prove Lemma 4.4.1. Let aλ : eC → Gr(Eκ) be the morphism con-
structed as in the lemma. Since eC is smooth and eU ⊂ eC is open dense, it is enough
to show that aλ(eU (k)) ⊂ Grµ(Eκ)(k). Let x ∈ eU (k) and aλ(x) = (x, Ex, β) ∈
Gr(Eκ)(k) be its image, where Ex := AJP,λ(x) ×J Eκ and β : EκC−x ≃ ExC−x is
the isomorphism induced by the canonical section s ∈ AJP,λ(x)(C − x). Let
rel : Grx(Eκ) → X•/W
be the map sending an element (E, β) to the relative position of β (cf. [BD, §5.2.2]).
We have (Ex, β) ∈ Grx(Eκ) and we need to show that rel(Ex, β) = µ. For simplicity,
we will denote P := AJP,λ(x).
Let GrJ (resp. GrT ) be the global Grassmannian for the group scheme J (resp.
T ). By [Yun, Lemma 3.2.5], the morphism j1 : π∗J → T × eC induces a W-equivariant
isomorphism
jGr : GrJ ×(C×B) eU ≃ GrT ×C eU
of group ind-schemes over eU . We denote by jx,Gr : Grx,Jb ≃ Grx,T the restriction of
jGr to x. We have (P, s) ∈ Grx,Jb(k) (here s ∈ P(C − x) is the canonical section)
and one can check that jx,Gr(P, s) = λ ∈ Grx,T (k) ≃ X•. The action of Grx,Jb on
(Eκ, φκ) defines a map aκ : Grx,Jb → Grx(Eκ). We claim that the following diagram
is commutative
(4.4.2)
Grx,Jb(k)
jx,Gr
aκ
Grx(Eκ)(k)
.
rel
Grx,T (k) ≃ X•
/ X•/W
Assuming the claim we see that rel(E, β) = rel(aκ(P, s)) is equal to the image of
jx,Gr(P, s) = λ ∈ X• in X•/W. But by assumption λ ∈ W · µ. This finishes the proof
of Lemma 4.4.1.
To prove the claim, recall that a trivialization γκ of Eκ on SpecOx defines an
isomorphism Grx(Eκ) ≃ G(Fx)/G(Ox). Moreover, under the canonical isomorphism
Grx,Jb(k) ≃ Jb(Fx)/Jb(Ox), Grx,T (k) ≃ T (Fx)/T (Ox) and G(Ox)\G(Fx)/G(Ox) =
X•/W, the diagram (4.4.2) can be identified with
Jb(Fx)/Jb(Ox)
G(Fx)/G(Ox)
pr
T (Fx)/T (Ox)
/ G(Ox)\G(Fx)/G(Ox),
where the the upper arrow is induced by the homomorphism
(4.4.3)
aEκ,φκ≃ Aut(Eκ, φκ) → Aut(Eκ)
γκ
≃ G
Jb
and the arrow in the left column is induced by the homomorphism j1 : π∗J → T × eC.
Let bx ∈ crs(Ox) be the restriction of b to SpecOx. Using the definition of aEκ,φκ in
(2.6.1), it is not hard to see that the restriction of (4.4.3) to SpecOx is equal to
(4.4.4)
Jbx ≃ Ikos(bx) ֒→ G × SpecOx,
35
/
/
/
/
/
/
bx→ c
kos
up to conjugation by an element in G(Ox). Here kos(bx) : SpecOx
→ g ∈
greg(Ox) and the first isomorphism is induced by the canonical isomorphism χ∗Jgreg ≃
Igreg in Proposition 2.5.1. Therefore, to prove the claim, it is enough to show that
7 is is equal to the map (4.4.4) up to left and right mul-
the restriction of j1 to SpecOx
tiplication by elements in G(Ox). To see this, we first observe that the point x defines
a lifting bx ∈ trs(Ox) of bx ∈ crs(Ox). Since the map G × grs → grs ×c grs,
(y, v) →
(Ad y(v), v) is smooth, there exists g ∈ G(Ox) such that Ad g(kos(bx)) = bx. The
= T × SpecOx, which is inde-
map Ad g induced an isomorphism ιg : Ikos(bx) ≃ Ibx
pendent of the choice of g, and according to [N2, Proposition 2.4.2] the restriction
of j1 to SpecOx is given by
(4.4.5)
Jbx ≃ Ikos(bx)
ιg
≃ T × SpecOx,
where the first map is the canonical isomorphism mentioned before. The above
description implies the map (4.4.4) is equal to the map (4.4.5) up to left and right
multiplication by elements in G(Ox). This finishes the proof of the claim.
5. Main result
We assume that G is semi-simple over k whose characteristic p is positive and
does not divide the order of the Weyl group of G. Let C be a smooth projective
curve over k, of genus at least two.
In this case, BunG is a "good" stack in the
sense of [BD, §1.1.1] (see also B.5). Let DBunG be the sheaf of algebras on Higgs′
G
in Proposition B.5.1. Denote by D0
G ×B′ B′0 the restriction of
DBunG to the smooth part of the Hitchin fibration. We define D -mod(BunG)0 as
the category of D0
-modules. As explained in B.5, the category D -mod(BunG)0
is a localization of the category of D-modules on BunG and is canonical equivalent
′0
to the category of twisted sheaves QCoh(D 0
and DBunG is the gerbe of crystalline differential operators on Higgs′
G. On the dual
side, let LocSys G be the stack of de Rham G-local systems on C. Recall that in
[CZ], we constructed a fibration
:= DBunGHiggs′
= DBunG ×B′ B
BunG
BunG
BunG
)1, where D 0
BunG
hp : LocSys G → B′
from LocSys G to the Hitchin base B′, which can be regraded as a deformation of
the usual Hitchin fibration. We define
Our goal is to prove the following Theorem:
LocSys0
G
:= LocSys G ×B′B
′0.
Theorem 5.0.4. Assume G is semi-simple and the genus of C is at least two. For a
choice of a square root κ of ωC, we have a canonical equivalence of bounded derived
categories
Dκ : Db(D -mod(BunG)0) ≃ Db(QCoh(LocSys0
G
))
The proof of above theorem is divided into two steps. The first step, which involves
the Langlands duality, is to establish a twisted version of the classical duality (see
§5.2). The second step, which does not involve the Langlands duality, is to establish
two abelianization theorems (see §5.3) for which we need a choice of square root κ
7Here we identify SpecOx ≃ SpecOx and regard j1 as a map of group schemes over SpecOx.
36
of ωC. Combining above two steps, our main theorem follows from a general version
of the Fourier-Mukai transform (see §5.4).
H . We first recall that in [CZ], we constructed a P ′-torsor
5.1. The P ′-torsor
H . It is defined via the following Cartesian diagram
H −−−−→ LocSys J p
(5.1.1)
y
B′
y
τ ′
−−−−→ B′
J ′
Here J p is the pullback of the universal centralizer J ′ over C ′ × B′ along the relative
frobenius map FC ′×B′/B′ : C ×B′ → C ′×B′. This is a group scheme with a canonical
connection along C, and therefore it makes sense to talk about the stack LocSys J p
of J p-torsors with flat connections. In addition, it admits a map LocSys J p → B′
J ′.
We refer to [CZ, Appendix] for generalities.
T (eC/B). We give a similar
description of the P ′-torsor
(eC/B)′-torsor. Recall that τ ′ is
regarded as a section of ΩC ′×B′/B′ ⊗Lie J ′, which defines a J ′-gerbe D(τ ′) on C ′ ×B′
H is isomorphic to TD(τ ′), the
(see B.4) and according to [CZ, Proposition A.9],
stack of splittings of D(τ ′) over B′. Therefore by Lemma 3.3.1 we have
Recall that there is a description of P in terms of BunW
H in terms of a BunW
T
B′0,
(5.1.2)
H B′0 ≃ T W,+
D(τ ′) T
where D(τ ′) T := (π∗D(τ ′))j1
is the T -gerbe on eC ′ induced from D(τ ′) using maps
π : eC ′ → C ′ × B′ and j1 : π∗ J ′ → T ′ × eC ′ (see A.6 for the induction functor of
On the other hand, using the definition of θ eC ′ ∈ Γ(eC ′, Ω eC ′ ⊗ t′)W in §4.1 one can
∗ π∗(τ ′) is the t′-valued 1-form induced from τ ′
check that j1
using maps π and j1. Therefore, by Lemma B.4.1 we see that over B
∗ π∗(τ ′) = θ eC ′, where j1
′0 we have
gerbes).
(5.1.3)
j1
D(τ ′) T := (π∗D(τ ′))
≃ D(j1
∗ π∗(τ ′)) ≃ D(θ eC ′).
Hence combining (5.1.2) and (5.1.3) we get the following Galois description of
H .
Corollary 5.1.1. There is a canonical isomorphism of P ′-torsors H B′0 ≃ T W,+
D(θ eC′ )B′0.
5.2. Twisted duality. Let us construct the twisted duality. Let θ′
denote the canonical multiplicative one form constructed in §4.2. Let D(θ′
the corresponding Gm-gerbe on P ′ obtained by pullback of DP on T ∗P ′ by θ′
B.4). According to C.2, the gerbe D(θ′
according to A.7, the stack of multiplicative splittings of D(θ′
torsor TD(θ′
m : P ′ → T ∗P ′
m) denote
m (see
m) is canonically multiplicative. Moreover,
m) over B′ is a (P ′)∨-
m). Our goal is to prove the following theorem.
Theorem 5.2.1. There is a canonical isomorphism of P ′∨ ≃ P ′-torsors
D : TD(θ′
m)B′0 ≃ H B′0.
37
For the rest of this subsection we will restrict everything to B
Jacobi map AJP ′
Therefore, Lemma B.4.1 implies that
: eC ′ × X• → P ′. By Proposition 4.2.1 we have (AJP ′
′0. Recall the Abel-
m = θ eC ′.
)∗θ′
(AJP ′
)∗D(θ′
m) = D(θ eC ′).
Since the Abel-Jacobi map AJP ′
functor
is W-equivariant, pullback via AJP ′
defines a
m) → T W
We claim that D canonically lifts to a morphism
m) → T W,+
D : TD(θ′
D : TD(θ′
D(θ eC′ ).
D(θ eC′ ) ≃ H ,
where the second isomorphism is Corollary 5.1.1. Let E ∈ TD(θ′
splitting of D(θ′
m) be a tensor
m). We need to show that the splitting
)∗E( eC ′
( D(E))α eC ′
= (AJP ′
α
α, α)
)∗D(θ′
m)( eC ′
admits a canonical isomorphism compatible with the canonical splitting E0
(AJP ′
unit of P ′ for x ∈ eC ′
is canonically isomorphic to the canonical splitting E0
summarize, we have constructed the following commutative diagram
α, α). However, this follows from the fact that AJP ′
α and a tensor splitting E of a multiplicative Gm-gerbe D(θ′
m)
m) over the unit. To
((x, α)) is the
α of D(θ′
α of D(θ eC ′)α eC ′
α
=
(5.2.1)
TD(θ′
m)
D
H
$❍❍❍❍❍❍❍❍❍
D
③③③③③③③③③③
F or
T W
D(θ eC′ )
By construction, the morphism D is compatible with the P ′∨ ≃ P ′-action, hence
is an equivalence. This finishes the proof of Theorem 5.2.1.
5.3. Abelianization Theorems. We need to fix a square root κ of ωC. Then the
Kostant section for Higgs′
G → B′ induces a map
ǫκ′ : P ′ ≃ Higgs′
G
reg ⊂ Higgs′
G,
where Higgs′
G
abelianization theorem is the following.
reg is the smooth sub-stack consisting of regular Higgs fields. The first
Theorem 5.3.1. We have a canonical isomorphism ǫ∗
m), where
DBunG is the Gm-gerbe on Higgs′
G of crystalline differential operators. Moreover,
the pullback along the map ǫκ′ defines an equivalence of categories of twisted sheaves
κ′ DBunG ≃ D(θ′
Aκ : Db(D -mod(Bun0
G)) ≃ Db(QCoh(D 0
BunG))1
ǫ∗
κ′
≃ Db(QCoh(D(θ′
m)B′0))1.
Proof. By Proposition B.3.3, the restriction of DBunG to Higgs′
G
can on Higgs′
the gerbe D(θ′
G
hand, it follows from the construction of θm in §4.2 that we have ǫ∗
Hence
can) defined by the canonical 1-form θ′
reg is isomorphic to
reg. On the other
m.
can = θ′
κ′θ′
κ′ DBunG ≃ ǫ∗
ǫ∗
κ′ D(θ′
can) ≃ D(ǫ∗
κ′θcan) ≃ D(θ′
m).
38
/
/
$
The last statement follows from the fact that the base change of ǫκ′ : P ′ → Higgs′
G
to B
(cid:3)
′0 is an isomorphism (see Proposition 2.6.1).
To state the second abelianization theorem, recall that in [CZ] we constructed a
canonical isomorphism
C : H ×
P ′
Higgs′
G
≃ LocSys G .
Moreover, by [CZ, Remark 3.14] the choice of the theta characteristic κ defines an
isomorphism ǫκ′ : P ′ ≃ Higgs′
G
reg, and hence induces an isomorphism
Cκ : H ≃ LocSysreg
G
⊂ LocSys G .
Here LocSysreg
G
curvature, and we have LocSysreg
G
B′0 = LocSys0
G
. It implies:
is the open substack consisting of G-local systems with regular p-
Theorem 5.3.2. For each choice of a square root κ of ωC, we have a canonical
isomorphism of P ′-torsors CκB′ 0 : H B′0 ≃ LocSys0
and it induces an equivalence
G
of categories
C∗
κ : Db(QCoh(LocSys0
G
)) ≃ Db(QCoh( H B′0)).
5.4. Proof of Theorem 5.0.4. We deduce our main theorem from the twisted
duality and above two abelianization theorems. By the twisted duality we have
an isomorphism of P ′∨ ≃ P ′-torsors TD(θ′
m)B′0 ≃ H B′0. Therefore the twisted
Fourier-Mukai transform (Theorem A.7.2) implies an equivalence of categories
D : Db(QCoh(D(θ′
m)B′0))1 ≃ Db(QCoh( H B′0)).
Now combining Theorem 5.3.1 and Theorem 5.3.2 we get the desired equivalence
Dκ = (C∗
κ)−1 ◦ D ◦ Aκ : Db(D -mod(Bun0
G)) ≃ Db(QCoh(LocSys0
G
)).
5.5. A µ2-gerbe of equivalences. In this subsection we study how those equiv-
alences Dκ : Db(D -mod(BunG)0) ≃ Db(QCoh(LocSys0
)) in Theorem 5.0.4 depend
G
on the choices of the theta characteristics κ. Our discussion is very similar to [FW]
and can be regarded as a verification of the predictions of [FW] in our setting.
Let ω1/2(C) be the groupoid of square roots of ωC. The groupoid ω1/2(C) is
a torsor over the Picard category µ2 -tors(C) of µ2-torsors on C. Let GLC be the
groupoid of equivalences between Db(D -mod(BunG)0) and Db(QCoh(LocSys0
)), i.e.
G
objects in GLC are equivalences E : Db(D -mod(BunG)0) ≃ Db(QCoh(LocSys0
))
G
and morphisms are isomorphisms between equivalences. We first construct an action
of µ2 -tors(C) on GLC.
Let Z = Z(G) be the center of G. We have a map α : µ2 → Z(G) by restricting
the cocharacter 2ρ : Gm → G to µ2 (see [BD, §3.4.2]). Thus for each χ ∈ µ2 -tors(C)
and (E, ∇) ∈ LocSysG we can twist (E, ∇) by χ using the map
µ2 → Z → Aut(E, ∇)
to get a new G-local system (E ⊗ χ, ∇E⊗χ) ∈ LocSysG. The assignment (χ, E, ∇) →
(E ⊗ χ, ∇E⊗χ) defines a geometric action
actG : µ2 -tors(C) × LocSysG → LocSysG .
39
Likewise, there is actG : µ2 -tors(C) × BunG → BunG. For χ ∈ µ2 -tors(C),
let aχ,G : BunG ≃ BunG (resp, bχ,G : LocSysG ≃ LocSysG ) be the automor-
phisms of BunG (resp. LocSysG) given by aχ,G(E) := E ⊗ χ, (resp. bχ,G(E, ∇) =
actG(χ, E, ∇)). They induce auto-equivalences a∗
χ,G of Db(D -mod(BunG))
and Db(QCoh(LocSysG)) respectively. Note that for the definition of a∗
χ,G,
there is no restriction of the characteristic of k. However, if chark = p ∤ W, we
have
χ,G and b∗
χ,G and b∗
Lemma 5.5.1. 1) The equivalence a∗
2) The equivalence b∗
χ,G preserves the full subcategory Db(QCoh(LocSys0
G)).
χ,G preserves the full subcategory Db(D -mod(BunG)0).
Proof. This lemma will be clear after we give alternative descriptions of a∗
b∗
χ,G.
First, recall that in §B.3 we introduce a Gm-gerbe DBunG over T ∗ Bun′
G and
the category QCoh(DBunG)1 of twisted sheaves on DBunG such that there is an
equivalence of categories between D -mod(BunG) and QCoh(DBunG)1. Let f :=
da′
χ,G. The map f preserves the
canonical one form θ′
can, and thus by Lemma B.4.1, there is a canonical 1-morphism
M : f ∗DBunG ∼ DBunG of gerbes on T ∗ Bun′
G. The 1-morphism M induces an
equivalence M : QCoh(f ∗DBunG)1 ≃ QCoh(DBunG)1 and it follows from definitions
that the functor a∗
G be the differential of a′
χ,G is isomorphic to the composition
χ,G : T ∗ Bun′
G ≃ T ∗ Bun′
χ,G and
(5.5.1)
Db(QCoh(DBunG)1)
f ∗
≃ Db(QCoh(f ∗DBunG)1)
M
≃ Db(QCoh(DBunG)1).
Recall that the category D -mod(BunG)0 is by definition the category of twisted
sheaves on D 0
= DBunGB′0. Therefore, Part 1) follows.
BunG
To prove Part 2), note that the map actG : µ2 -tors(C) × LocSysG → LocSysG
can be also described as follows. There is a map of group schemes (µ2)C ′×B′ →
Z(G)C ′×B′ → J ′ over C ′ × B′, which induces a morphism of Picard stacks
(5.5.2)
lµ2 : µ2 -tors(C) × B′ → P ′,
and the action map actG can be identified with
(5.5.3)
actG : µ2 -tors(C) × LocSysG
lµ2 ×id
→ P ′ ×B′ LocSysG → LocSysG
where the last map is the action of P ′ on LocSysG defined in [CZ, Proposition 3.5].
In particular, if we endow B′ with the trivial : µ2 -tors(C) action, the p-Hitchin map
LocSysG → B′ is : µ2 -tors(C)-equivariant. Therefore LocSys0
G is invariant under
the action of bχ,G, and Part 2) follows.
(cid:3)
From now on we regard a∗
χ,G and b∗
χ,G as automorphisms of the category Db(D -mod(BunG)0)
and Db(Qcoh(LocSys0
G)).
For each χ ∈ µ2 tors(C) and E ∈ GLC we define
χ · E := b∗
χ, G
◦ E ◦ a∗
χ,G ∈ GLC.
The following lemma follows from the construction of b∗
χ, G
and a∗
χ,G .
Lemma 5.5.2. The functor µ2 -tors(C) × GLC → GLC given by (χ, E) → χ · E
defines an action of the Picard category µ2 -tors(C) on GLC.
40
Now let C1 and C2 be two categories acted by a Picard category G . A G -module
functor from C1 to C2 is a functor N : C1 → C2 equipped with functorial isomor-
phisms N (a · c) ≃ a · N (c) satisfying the natural compatibility condition. Here is
the main result of this subsection
Proposition 5.5.3. The assignment κ → Dκ defines a µ2 -tors(C)-module functor
Φ : ω1/2(C) → GLC.
Proof. Given χ ∈ µ2 -tors(C) and κ ∈ ω1/2(C) we need to specify a functorial
isomorphism Dχ·κ ≃ χ · Dκ satisfying the natural compatibility condition. First,
observe that the maps ǫκ′, ǫκ′
G induced by κ, κ1 := χ · κ ∈ µ2 -tors(C)
differ by a translation of the section lµ2({χ} × B′) ∈ P ′(B′), where lµ2 is the map
in (5.5.2). Then it follows from the construction of Aκ and Cκ in §5.3 that there are
canonical functorial isomorphisms Aχ·κ ≃ Aκ ◦ a∗
χ·κ. Therefore
we get a functorial isomorphism
: P ′ → Higgs′
χ,G and C∗
κ ◦ b∗
≃ C∗
χ, G
1
Dχ·κ = (C∗
χ·κ)−1 ◦ D ◦ Aχ·κ ≃ b∗
χ, G
◦ (C∗
κ)−1 ◦ D ◦ Aκ ◦ a∗
χ,G = χ · Dκ,
and one can check that it satisfies the natural compatibility condition.
(cid:3)
Remark 5.5.4. The above construction suggests that the geometric Langlands cor-
respondence should be a µ2 -gerbe of equivalences between Db(D -mod(BunG)) and
Db(QCoh(LocSys G)). This gerbe is trivial, but is not canonically trivialized. One
obtains a particular trivialization of this gerbe, and hence a particular equivalence
Dκ, for each choice of a square root of the canonical line bundle of C. A similar
µ2-gerbe also appears in the work of Frenkel and Witten [FW, §10], where the geo-
metric Langlands correspondence is interpreted as gauge theory duality between the
twisted A-model of HiggsG and the twisted B-model of Higgs G.
5.6. The actions a∗
χ,G as tensoring of line bundles. In this subsec-
tion we show that, under the equivalence Dκ, the geometric actions a∗
χ,G
constructed in previous subsection become functors of tensoring with certain line
bundles.
χ,G and b∗
χ,G and b∗
Recall that in §3.8 we associated to every Z( G)-torsor K on C a line bundle LG,K
on BunG. For any χ ∈ µ2 -tors(C) let KG,χ := χ ×µ2 ZG ∈ Z(G) -tors(C) be the
induced Z(G)-torsor via the canonical map 2ρ : µ2 → Z(G). We denote by LG,χ and
L G,χ be the line bundles on BunG and Bun G corresponding to K G,χ and KG,χ. Since
the line bundle LG,χ carries a canonical connection with zero p-curvature, tensoring
with LG,χ defines an auto-equivalence LG,χ⊗? of Db(D -mod(BunG)0).
For any κ ∈ ω1/2(C) let Dκ : Db(D -mod(BunG)0) ≃ Db(QCoh(LocSys0
G
equivalence in Theorem 5.0.4.
)) be the
Theorem 5.6.1. 1) The equivalence Dκ intertwines the auto-equivalence LG,χ⊗?
of Db(D -mod(BunG)0) and the auto-equivalence b∗
)) con-
structed in §5.5.
2) The equivalence Dκ intertwines the auto-equivalence a∗
as in §5.5 and the auto-equivalence L G,χ⊗? on Db(QCoh(LocSys0
G
L G,χ as a line bundle on LocSys0
G
Remark 5.6.2. Similar actions by tensoring line bundles on LocSysG and on HiggsG
also appear in the work of Frenkel and Witten [FW, §10.4]. Moreover, the authors
χ,G of Db(D -mod(BunG)0)
)) (here we regard
via the projection LocSys G → Bun G).
on Db(QCoh(LocSys0
G
χ, G
41
also predict that the geometric Langlands correspondence should interchange these
actions.
Combining Theorem 5.5.3 and Theorem 5.6.1 we have the following:
Corollary 5.6.3. Let κ1, κ2 ∈ ω1/2(C). Then there is a natural isomorphism of
equivalences
Dκ1 ≃ (L G,χ⊗ ?) ◦ Dκ2 ◦ (LG,χ⊗ ?).
Here χ ∈ µ2 -tors(C) such that κ1 = χ · κ2 and LG,χ⊗ ? (resp. L G,χ⊗ ?) is the
functor of tensoring with the line bundle LG,χ (resp. L G,χ).
The rest of this subsection is devoted to the proof of this theorem.
We first introduce a morphism of Picard stack
l : Z(G) -tors(C) × B′ → Pic( H )
and prove a twisted version of Proposition 3.8.4. We begin with the construction
of l. Let BunJ p be the Picard stack of J p-torsors over C. We have the generalized
Chern class map c J p : Bun J p → Π G(1) -gerbes(X) × B′ and a Picard functor l J p :
Z(G) -tors(C) × B′ → Pic(Bun J p). We define
l : Z(G) -tors(C) × B′ l J p
→ Pic(Bun J p) → Pic( H )
where the last map is induced by the restriction map H = LocSys J p(τ ′) → Bun J p.
Recall the morphism l J : ZG -tors(C) × B′ → P ′ constructed in §3.8. For any
Z(G)-torsor K over C, we define
L J p,K := l({K} × B′) ∈ Pic( H ).
Let K ′ denote the Frobenius descendent of K (as Cet ≃ C ′
J ′ = l J ({K ′} × B′) ∈ P ′(B′).
K ′
et), and let
m) to K ′
m to K ′
J ′
J ′
∈ QCoh(P ′) as an object in QCoh(D(θ′
) ∈ Pic( H ) be the image of δK ′
J ′ via the twisted duality. From the definition of
J ′ is zero. Thus
J ′ is canonical trivial and we can re-
m))1. Let
under the twisted duality D :
We will relate L J p,K with K ′
m in §4.2, one can easily check that the restriction of θ′
θ′
the restriction of the Gm-gerbe D(θ′
gard the structure sheaf δK ′
J ′
LK = D(δK ′
Db(QCoh(D(θ′)))1 ≃ Db(QCoh( H )).
Lemma 5.6.4. We have LK ≃ L J p,K.
Proof. Let G := D(θ′
m)∨. We have a short exact sequence of Beilinson's 1-motives
p
0 → P ′ → G
→ Z → 0 and H = p−1(1). The construction of duality for torsors in
A.7 implies that there is a multiplicative line bundle LG,K on G such that LG,K H ≃
LK. Moreover, this line bundle is characterized by the property that LG,K P ′ ≃
J ′). Observe that we have a natural map G → Bun J p of Picard stacks8 such
D−1
that the composition H → G → Bun J p is the natural inclusion. Thus the morphism
cl (K ′
8We have G = {(n, t)n ∈ Z, t ∈ H ⊗n} and H ⊗n is isomorphic to LocSys J p (n · τ ′), the base
change of LocSys J p → B J ′ along the section n · τ ′ : B ′ → B J ′ . Thus there is a natural map
H ⊗n → Bun J p and the map G → Bun J p is given by G → H ⊗n → Bun J p.
42
l : ZG -tors(C) × B′ → Pic( H ) factors through a morphism lG : ZG -tors(C) × B′ →
G∨, and the corresponding multiplicative line bundle LG,K := lG({K}×B′) ∈ P∨(B′)
It is enough to show that LG,K ≃ LG,K. From the
satisfies LG,K H ≃ L J p,K.
characterization of LG,K, it is enough to show that LG,K P ′ ≃ D−1
J ′). But this
follows from Proposition 3.8.4 and the fact that LG,K P ′ is isomorphic to L J ′,K ′. (cid:3)
Recall that a choice of κ ∈ ω1/2(C) defines an isomorphism Cκ : H ≃ LocSysreg
.
G
C Eκ′ :=
C Eκ′ ) where P ⊗ F ∗
More precisely, we have Cκ(P, ∇) = (P ⊗ F ∗
P ×J p
C Eκ′, ∇P ⊗F ∗
CEκ′ is the product connection.
CEκ′ and ∇P ⊗F ∗
cl (K ′
F ∗
pr
→
Cκ→ LocSys G
κ ◦ pr∗L G,K.
Lemma 5.6.5. The pull back of the line bundle L G,K along the map H
Bun G is isomorphic to LK . I.e. we have LK ≃ C∗
Proof. The proof is similar to the proof of Lemma 3.8.2. Recall that the line bun-
dles L G,K and LK ≃ L J p,K are induced by the generalized Chern class map c G,
c J p. Therefore it is enough to show that for any (P, ∇) ∈ H there is a canonical
isomorphism c J p(P ) ≃ c G(Cκ(P )) of Π G -gerbes, where Cκ(P ) = P ×J p
CEκ′. Let
P ∈ c J p(P ) and Eκ′ be the canonical lifting of the Kostant section appearing in
Lemma 3.8.2. The Gsc-torsor P ×(J p
Eκ′ is a lifting of Cκ(P ) and the assign-
ment P → P ×(J p
Eκ′ defines an isomorphism between cJ p(P ) and c G(Cκ(P )).
sc) F ∗
C
This finishes the proof.
(cid:3)
sc) F ∗
C
F ∗
Now we prove the theorem. Recall that we have Dκ = (C∗
κ)−1 ◦ D ◦ Aκ where Aκ
κ are equivalences constructed in §5.3. It follows from the definition that under
becomes the functor induced by the geometric
H 9. Now Theorem A.7.2 implies, under the
G,χ
∈ Z( G) -tors(C ′) on
κ the functor b∗
and C∗
the equivalence C∗
action of K ′
equivalence
G,χ
D : Db(QCoh(D(θ′
m)B′0))1 ≃ Db(QCoh( H B′0)),
above geometric action becomes the functor of tensoring with the line bundle L′
D−1
) ∈ (BunJ ′)∨10. By Lemma 3.8.2 and Lemma 3.8.4, the line bundle L′
J,χ :=
J,χ is
cl (K ′
G,χ
G,χ under the map P ′ ǫ′
equal to the pull back of L′
G. On the other
hand, since the equivalence Aκ : Db(D -mod(Bun0
m)B′0))1 is
induced by pullback along the morphism ǫκ : P → HiggsG, an easy exercise shows
that under the equivalence Aκ the functor of tensoring with L′
J,χ becomes the functor
of tensoring with LG,χ. This implies Part 1).
κ→ Higgs′
G)) ≃ Db(QCoh(D(θ′
G → Bun′
The proof of part 2) is similar to part 1). Unraveling the definition of a∗
G,χ
and the construction of Aκ, one sees that Aκ interchanges the functor a∗
G,χ with the
∈ QCoh(P ′). Now Theorem A.7.2 implies
functor of convolution product with δK ′
that, under the equivalence D, the above convolution action becomes the functor of
tensoring with the line bundle LKG,χ := D(K ′
G,χ) ∈ Pic H . By Lemma 5.6.4 and
G,χ
9Recall that K G,χ carries a canonical connection with zero p-curvature and K ′
G,χ is its Frobenius
descent.
10 Here we use the fact that ωP∨/B ∼= pr∗
B(e∗ωP∨/B) is trivial. Indeed, since B is isomorphic
to an affine space we have e∗ωP∨/B ∈ Pic (B) = 0.
Lemma 5.6.5, the line bundle LKG,χ is isomorphic to the pull back of L G,χ under the
map H
κ ◦ (pr∗L G,χ⊗?) ≃ ( LKG,χ⊗?) ◦ C∗
κ.
pr
→ Bun G. It implies that C∗
Cκ→ LocSys G
Appendix A. Beilinson's 1-motive
In this section, we review the duality theory of Beilinson's 1-motives. The main
references are [Ar, DP1, DP2, Lau].
A.1. Picard Stack. Let us first review the theory of Picard stacks. The standard
reference is [Del, §1.4]. Let T be a given site. Recall that a Picard Stack is a stack
P over T together with a bi-functor
and the associativity and commutative constraints
⊗ : P × P → P,
a : ⊗ ◦ (⊗ × 1) ≃ ⊗ ◦ (1 × ⊗),
c : ⊗ ≃ ⊗ ◦ flip,
such that for every U ∈ T, P(U ) form a Picard groupoid (i.e. symmetrical monoidal
groupoid such that every object has a monoidal inverse). The Picard stack is called
strictly commutative if cx,x = idx for every x ∈ P. In the paper, Picard stacks will
always mean strictly commutative ones.
Let us denote by PS/T the 2-category of Picard stacks over T. This means that
if P1, P2 are two Picard stacks over T, HomPS/T(P1, P2) form a category. Indeed,
PS/T is canonically enriched over itself. For P1, P2 ∈ PS/T, we use Hom(P1, P2)
to denote the Picard stack of 1-homomorphisms from P1 to P2 over T (cf.
[Del]
§1.4.7). On the other hand, let C [−1,0] be the 2-category of 2-term complexes of
sheaves of abelian groups d : K−1 → K0 with K−1 injective and 1-morphisms
are morphisms of chain complexes (and 2-morphisms are homotopy of chain com-
plexes)11. Let K ∈ C [−1,0]. We associate to it a Picard prestack pch(K) whose U
point is the following Picard category
(1) Objects of pch(K)(U) are equal to K0(U ).
(2) If x, y ∈ K0(U ), a morphism from x to y is an element f ∈ K−1(U ) such
that df = y − x.
Let ch(K) be the stackification of pch(K). Then a theorem of Deligne (cf.
Corollaire 1.4.17]) says that the functor
[Del,
ch : C[−1,0] → PS/T
is an equivalence of 2-categories.
Let us fix an inverse functor ()♭ of the above equivalence. So for P a Picard
stack, we have a 2-term complex of sheaves of abelian groups P ♭ := K−1 → K0.
For example, if A is an abelian group in T, then its classifying stack BA is a natural
Picard stack and (BA)♭ can be represented by a 2-term complex quasi-isomorphic
to A[1]. The following result of Deligne (cf. [Del, Construction 1.4.18]) is convenient
for computations.
(A.1.1)
(Hom(P1, P2))♭ ≃ τ≤0 R Hom(P ♭
1, P ♭
2).
11The 2-category C [−1,0] is an enhancement of the subcategory D[−1,0] ⊂ D of the derived cate-
gory consisting of complexes concentrated in cohomological degrees [−1, 0]. That is, the homotopy
category of C [−1,0] is equivalent to D[−1,0].
A.2. Short exact sequences of Picard stacks. Let a : P1 → P2 be a homo-
morphism of Picard stacks. We define ker(a) as the fiber P1 ×P2 {e}, where e ∈ P2
is the unit. Then ker(a) acquires a natural Picard stack structure. It follows from
the construction of ch that
Lemma A.2.1. There is a natural isomorphism ker(a)♭ ≃ τ≤0C(a♭)[−1], where
C(a♭) is the cone of the morphism of complexes
1 → P ♭
2.
a♭ : P ♭
A left exact sequence of Picard stacks, usually denoted by
1 → P1
a
→ P2
b
→ P3,
is a sequence of homomorphisms of Picard stacks that exhibits P1 as ker(b). If, in
addition locally on T, b is essentially surjective, we call such a sequence exact and
denote it by
1 → P1
a
→ P2
b
→ P3 → 1.
Sometimes, we also call P2 an extension of P3 by P1. The following lemma is used
in several places in the paper.
Lemma A.2.2. The sequence of homomorphisms P1 → P2 → P3 is exact if and
only if
P ♭
3 →
1 → P ♭
2 → P ♭
is a distinguished triangle.
A.3. Duality of Picard stacks. Let S be a noetherian scheme. We consider the
category Sch/S of schemes over S. We will endow Sch/S with fpqc topology in the
following discussion.
Definition A.3.1. For a Picard stack P, we define the dual Picard stack as
P ∨ := Hom(P, BGm).
Example A.3.2. Let A → S be an abelian scheme over S. Then by definition
A∨ := Hom(A, BGm) = Ext1(A, Gm) classifies the multiplicative line bundles on A,
is represented by an abelian scheme over S, called the dual abelian scheme of A.
Example A.3.3. Let Γ be a finitely generated abelian group over S. By definition,
this means locally on S, Γ is isomorphic to the constant sheaf MS, where M is a
finitely generate abelian group (in the naive sense). Recall that the Cartier dual
of Γ, denoted by D(Γ) is the sheaf which assigns every scheme U over S the group
Hom(Γ ×S U, Gm), which is represented by an affine group scheme over S. We claim
that Γ∨ ≃ B D(Γ). By (A.1.1), it is enough to show that Ri Hom(Γ, Gm) = 0 if i > 0.
This is clear since locally on S, Γ is represented by a 2-term complex Zm
S → Zn
S.
Example A.3.4. Let G be a group of multiplicative type over S, i.e. G = D(Γ) for
some finitely generated abelian group Γ over S. Let P = BG, the classifying stack
of G. We have
P ∨ ≃ τ≤0 R Hom(BG, BGm) ≃ Hom(G, Gm) ≃ Γ.
Definition A.3.5. Let P be a Picard stack. We say that P is dualizable if the
canonical 1-morphism P → P ∨∨ is an isomorphism.
By the above examples, abelian schemes, finitely generated abelian groups, and
the classifying stacks of groups of multiplicative type are dualizable.
Let P be a dualizable Picard stack. There is the Poincare line bundle LP over
P×SP ∨. Let Db(QCoh(P)) denote the bounded derived category of quasi coherent
sheaves on P. We define the Fourier-Mukai functor
ΦP : Db(QCoh(P)) → Db(QCoh(P ∨)), ΦP(F ) = (R p2)∗(L p∗
1F ⊗ LP ).
Here p1 : P ×S P ∨ → P and p2 : P ×S P ∨ → P ∨ denote the natural projections.
It is easy to see in the case when P is of the form given in the above examples,
ΦP is an equivalence of categories. Indeed, the case when P = A follows from the
results of Mukai; the case when P = Γ or BG is clear.
It is not clear to us whether ΦP is an equivalence for all dualizable Picard stacks.
In the following subsection, we select out a particular class of Picard stacks, called
the Beilinson's 1-motive (following [DP1] and Arinkin's appendix to [DP2]), for
which the Fourier-Mukai transforms are equivalences.
A.4. Beilinson's 1-motives. Let P1, P2 be two Picard stacks. We say that P1 ⊂
P2 if there is a 1-morphism φ : P1 → P2, which is a faithful embedding.
Definition A.4.1. We called a Picard stack P a Beilinson's 1-motive if it admits
a two step filtration W•P:
W−1 = 0 ⊂ W0 ⊂ W1 ⊂ W2 = P
such that (i) GrW
(ii) GrW
group.
1 ≃ A is an abelian scheme; and (iii) GrW
0 ≃ BG is the classifying stack of a group G of multiplicative type;
2 ≃ Γ is a finitely generated abelian
Lemma A.4.2. The dual of a Beilinson's 1-motive is a Beilinson's 1-motive and
Beilinson's 1-motives are dualizable.
Proof. This is proved via the induction on the length of the filtration. We use the
following fact. Let
0 → P ′ → P → P ′′ → 0
be a short exact sequence of Picard stacks. Then
0 → (P ′′)∨ → P ∨ → (P ′)∨
with the right arrow surjective if R2 Hom((P ′′)♭, Gm) = 0.
If P = W0P, this is given by Example A.3.4.
If P = W1P, we have the
following exact sequence
0 → BG → P → A → 0.
Using the fact that Ext2(A, Gm) = 0 (See [LB, Remark 6]), we know that P is also
a Beilinson's 1-motive. In general, we have
0 → W1P → P → Γ → 0,
and the lemma follows from the fact Ext2(Γ, Gm) = 0 (see Example A.3.3).
Corollary A.4.3. Let P be a Beilinson 1-motive, and P ∨ be its dual. Then
D(AutP (e)) = π0(P ∨), where e denotes the unit of P and π0 denotes the group of
connected components of P ∨.
(cid:3)
Lemma A.4.4. Let P be a Beilinson's 1-motive. Then locally on S,
P ≃ A × BG × Γ.
Proof. It is enough to prove that
Ext1(Γ, BG) = Ext1(Γ, A) = Ext1(A, BG) = 0.
Clearly, Ext1(Γ, BG) = Ext2(Γ, G) = 0. To see that Ext1(Γ, A) = 0, we can assume
that Γ = Z/nZ. Then it follows that A n→ A is surjective in the flat topology that
Ext1(Γ, A) = 0.
To see that Ext1(A, BG) = 0, let P to the Beilinson's 1-motive corresponding to
a class in Ext1(A, BG). Taking the dual, we have 0 → A∨ → P ∨ → D(G) → 0.
Therefore, locally on S, P ∨ ≃ A∨ × D(G), and therefore locally on S, P ∨∨ ≃
A × BG.
(cid:3)
Definition A.4.5 (cf.
the following two conditions
[Ar]). We say that a Picard stack P is good if it satisfies
(1) P is dualizable, i.e., the map r : P → P ∨∨ is an isomorphism of Picard
stacks.
(2) The functor ΦP : Db(QCoh(P)) → Db(QCoh(P ∨)) is an equivalence of
categories.
As explained in §A.3 (see also [BB]), examples of good Picard stacks include
BG, Γ and abelian schemes over S, as well as fiber products over S of such. More
generally
Theorem A.4.6 ([Ar], Proposition A.6). Let P be a Beilinson's 1-motive. Then
P is "good" in the sense of Definition A.4.5. In particular, the functor ΦP is an
equivalence of categories.
Proof. Indeed, the property of being good is fpqc-local on S. This can be seen by
lifting ΦP to a functor between stable ∞-categories of quasi-coherent sheaves and
then applying a descent argument. Therefore, the theorem follows from Lemma
A.4.4 and the above examples.
Alternatively, similar to the usual Fourier-Mukai transform, one can show directly
that in our generality, there is still an isomorphism of functors ΦP ∨ ◦ ΦP ≃ ω−1
P/S ⊗
(−1)∗[−g], where ωP/S is the canonical sheaf and g is the relative dimension of
P/S12. By the argument as in [Mu2] (see also [Lau]), one reduces to show that the
kernel complex
23LP ) ≃ m∗ R p1∗LP
for the functor ΦP ∨ ◦ ΦP is isomorphic to the kernel complex
13LP ⊗ L p∗
R p12∗(L p∗
σ∗(ω−1
P/S )[−g] ≃ m∗e∗(e∗ω−1
P/S)[−g]
for ω−1
P/S ⊗ (−1)∗[−g]. Here pij are the projections of P ×S P ×S P ∨ on the
(i, j)-factors, σ : P → P ×S P, x → (x, x−1) and e : S → P is the unit morphism.
To prove this, we first observe that there is a natural map
R p1∗LP ≃ Rg p1∗LP [−g] → e∗ Rg prS∗OP ∨ [−g] → e∗(e∗ω−1
P/S)[−g].
We claim that the map above is an isomorphism, and hence induces m∗ R p1∗LP ≃
m∗e∗(e∗ω−1
P/S)[−g]. To prove the claim, we observe that, using Lemma A.4.4 and
fpqc base change, we can assume P ≃ A × BG × Γ and the claim follows from the
results in [Mu2, p.519] or [Lau, Lemma 1.2.5].
(cid:3)
12This argument was suggested to us by the referees.
Entirely similar arguments as in [Mu1, p.160] and [Lau, Corollary 1.3.3] give us
Theorem A.4.7. Let P be a Beilinson 1-motive. Let
∗ : Db(QCoh(P)) × Db(QCoh(P)) → Db(QCoh(P))
be the functor defined by F1 ∗ F2 := R m∗(F1 ⊠ F2). We called ∗ the convolution
product. Then there are canonical isomorphisms
ΦP(F1 ∗ F2) ≃ ΦP(F1) ⊗ ΦP(F2)
and
ΦP (F1 ⊗ F2) ≃ (ΦP(F1) ∗ ΦP (F2)) ⊗ ωP ∨/S[g].
A.5. Multiplicative torsors and extensions of Beilinson 1-motives. Let us
return to the general set-up. Let T be a fixed site and let P be a Picard stack over
T. A torsor of P is a stack Q over T, together with a bi-functor
Action : P × Q → Q,
satisfying the following properties:
(i) the bi-functor Action defines a monoidal action of P on Q;
(ii) For every V ∈ T, there exists a covering U → V , such that Q(U ) is non-empty.
(iii) For every U ∈ T such that Q(U ) is non-empty and let D ∈ Q(U ), the functor
P(U ) → Q(U ), C 7→ Action(C, D)
is an equivalence.
In the case when P is the Picard stack of G-torsors for some sheaf of abelian
groups G, people usually call a P-torsor Q a G-gerbe.
All P-torsors form a 2-category, denoted by BP, is canonically enriched over
I.e., given two P-torsors Q1, Q2, HomP (Q1, Q2) is a natural
itself ([OZ, §2.3]).
P-torsor. An object in HomP (Q1, Q2) induces an equivalence between Q1 and Q2.
In addition, there is a monoidal structure on BP making BP a Picard 2-stack.
Remark A.5.1. Let 1 → P1 → P → ZS → 1 be an exact sequence of Picard
stacks. Then T := P ×ZS {1} is naturally a P1-torsor. As explained in [Ar] and
[Trav, §3.1], the correspondence P → T induces an equivalence of 2-categories
between extensions of ZS by P1 and P1-torsors.
Now, let P and P1 be two Picard stacks and let G be a P1-torsor over P.
Let m : P × P → P, e : T → P be the multiplication morphism and the unit
morphism respectively, and let σ : P ×P → P ×P be the flip map σ(x, y) = (y, x).
Definition A.5.2. A commutative group structure on G consists of the following
data:
(1) An equivalence M : G ⊠ G ≃ m∗G of P1-torsors over P × P;
(2) A 2-morphism γ between the resulting two 1-morphisms between G ⊠ G ⊠ G
and m∗G over P × P × P, which satisfies the cocycle condition.
(3) A 2-morphism i : σ∗M ≃ M such that i2 = id. (Note that σ∗(M ) is another
1-morphism between m∗G and G ⊠ G .)
Clearly, all P1-torsors over P with a commutative group structure also form a
2-category.
We have the following Lemma.
Lemma A.5.3. A commutative group structure on G makes G into a Picard stack
which fits into the following short exact sequence:
0 → P1 → G → P → 0.
In particular, if P is a Beilinson's 1-motive, and P1 = BGm, then G is a Beilinson's
1-motive. In this case, we also call G a multiplicative Gm-gerbe over P.
Definition A.5.4. A multiplicative splitting of a P1-torsor G over P with a com-
mutative group structure is a 1-morphism (in the category of all P1-torsors over P
with a commutative group structure): P → G .
A.6. Induction functor. Let φ : P → P1 be a morphism of Picard stacks. Then
to each P-torsor Q we may associate a P1-torsor Qφ := HomP (Q−1, P1) whose
sections are P-equivariant functors from Q−1 := HomP (Q, P) to P1 (here P acts
on P1 via φ) and whose morphisms are natural transformations of such functors.
We have a canonical functor Q → Qφ, compatible with their P and P1-structure
via φ. For any section E of Q we denote by Eφ the section of Qφ induced by the
canonical map Q → Qφ.
A.7. Duality for torsors. Let Y be an algebraic stack. Let fY be a Gm-gerbe
over Y , i.e. fY is a BGm-torsor over Y . We say fY is split if it is isomorphic to
Y × BGm. Let Db(QCoh(fY )) be the bounded derived category of quasi coherent
sheaves on fY . If fY is split, there is a decomposition
(A.7.1)
Db(QCoh(fY )) = ⊕n∈ZDb(QCoh(fY ))n
13. In general we still have such a decomposition
according to the character of Gm
given as follows: M ∈ Db(QCoh(fY ))n if only if a∗(M) ∈ Db(QCoh(fY ))n, where
a : BGm × fY → fY is the action map.
Definition A.7.1. The direct summand Db(QCoh(fY ))1 is called the category of
twisted sheaves on fY .
Now we further assume Y = P is a Beilinson's 1-motive over S and fY = D is
a multiplicative Gm-gerbe over P. Let P and D as above. Then by Lemma A.5.3
we have the following short exact sequence
(A.7.2)
as Picard stacks. Note that in this case D is also a Beilinson's 1-motive. Let D ∨ be
the dual Beilinson's 1-motive. It fits into the short exact sequence
0 → BGm
i
→ D
p
→ P → 0
0 → P ∨ → D ∨ π
→ ZS → 0.
Let
(A.7.3)
be the P ∨-torsor associated to above extension. We call TD the stack of multiplica-
tive splitting of D. To justify the name, let us give an alternative description of TD .
By definition the dual of D is
TD = π−1(1)
D ∨ = Hom(D, BGm).
13The direct sum in (A.7.1) means that every object in Db(QCoh( eY )) decomposes as a direct
sum of objects in the subcategories Db(QCoh( eY ))n.
An element s ∈ D ∨ belongs to TD if and only if the composition
BGm
i
→ D
s
→ BGm
is equal to the identity. Equivalently, s ∈ TD gives a splitting of the exact sequence
(A.7.2) and according to A.5.4 it is a multiplicative splitting of D.
The following theorem follows immediately from Theorem A.4.7:
Theorem A.7.2 ([Ar], [Trav] §3.2). 1) The Fourier-Mukai functor ΦD restricts to
an equivalence
ΦD : Db(QCoh(D))1 ≃ Db(QCoh(TD )).
2) There is an action of Db(Qcoh(P)) on Db(QCoh(D))1 by tensoring and an
action of Db(QCoh(P ∨)) on Db(QCoh(TD )) by convolution. Those two actions are
compatible with the above equivalence in the following sense: There is a canonical
isomorphism
ΦD (F1 ⊗ F2) ≃ (ΦD (F1) ∗ ΦD (F2)) ⊗ ωP ∨/S[g]
for F1 ∈ Db(Qcoh(P)) and F2 ∈ Db(QCoh(D))1. Here ωP ∨/S is the canonical sheaf
and g is the relative dimension of P/S.
3) The convolution product ∗ on Db(QCoh(D)) induces a convolution product on
Db(QCoh(D))1 (by abuse of notation we still denote it by ∗). On the other hand,
the category Db(QCoh(TD )) has the usual monoidal structure by tensoring. The
equivalence ΦD is compatible with those monoidal structures: There is a canonical
isomorphism
ΦD (F1 ∗ F2) ≃ ΦD (F1) ⊗ ΦD (F2)
for F1, F2 ∈ Db(QCoh(D))1.
Appendix B. D-modules on stacks and Azumaya property
In this section we review some basic facts about D-modules on algebraic stacks
and the Azumaya property of the sheaf of differential operators. Standard references
are [BD] and [BB].
B.1. Azumaya algebras and twisted sheaves. Let us begin with a review of the
basic definition of Azumaya algebras and the category of twisted sheaves. Let S be
a Noetherian scheme. Let X be an algebraic stack over S. Recall that an Azumaya
algebra A over X is a quasi-coherent sheaf of OX -algebras, which is locally in
smooth topology isomorphic to End(V) for some vector bundle V on X . Such an
isomorphism between A and the matrix algebra is called a splitting of A. Given an
Azumaya algebra A on X , one can associate to it the Gm-gerbe DA of splittings
over X , i.e., for any U → S we have
(B.1.1)
DA(U ) = {(x, V, i)x ∈ X (U ), i : End(V) ≃ x∗(A)}.
We will use the following proposition in the sequel:
Proposition B.1.1 ([DP2], §2.1.2). Let A be a sheaf of Azumaya algebras on X .
There is the following equivalence of categories
QCoh(DA)1 ≃ A -mod(QCoh(X ))
where A -mod(Qcoh(X )) is the category of A-modules which is quasi-coherent as
OX -modules.
B.2. D-module on scheme. Let X be a scheme smooth over S. Let DX/S be the
sheaf of crystalline differential operators on X, i.e., DX/S is the universal enveloping
D-algebra associated to the relative tangent Lie algebroid TX/S. By definition, the
category of D-modules on X is the category of modules over DX/S that are quasi-
coherent as OX -modules. We denote by D -mod(X) the category of D-modules on
X. In the case pOS = 0, we have the following fundamental observation:
Theorem B.2.1 ( [BMR], §1.3.2, §2.2.3). The center of (FX/S )∗DX/S is isomorphic
to OT ∗(X ′/S) and there is an Azumaya algebra DX/S on T ∗(X ′/S) such that
(FX/S )∗DX/S ≃ (τX ′)∗DX/S .
where τX ′ : T ∗(X ′/S) → X ′ is the natural projection.
In particular, we have the following:
Corollary B.2.2. There is a canonical equivalence of categories
where DDX/S is the gerbe of splittings of DX/S.
D -mod(X) ≃ QCoh(DDX/S )1
In what follows, the gerbe DDX/S will be denoted by DX/S for simplicity.
B.3. D-module on stack. Let S be a Noetherian scheme and pOS = 0. Let X be
a smooth algebraic stack over S. A D-module M on X is an assignment for each
U → X in Xsm, a DU/S-module MU and for each morphism f : V → U in Xsm
an isomorphism φf : f ∗MU ≃ MV which satisfies the cocycle conditions. We denote
the category of D-modules on X by D -mod(X ).
Unlike the case of schemes, in general there does not exist a sheaf of algebras DX /S
on X such that the category of D-modules on X is equivalent to the category of
modules over DX /S, and therefore the naive stacky generalization of Theorem B.2.1
is wrong. On the other hand, it is shown in [Trav] that the obvious stacky version
of Corollary B.2.2 is correct:
Proposition B.3.1. There exists a Gm-gerbe DX /S on T ∗(X ′/S) such that the
category of twisted sheaves on DX /S is equivalent to the category of D-modules on
X , i.e., we have
D -mod(X ) ≃ QCoh(DX /S)1.
Remark B.3.2. It is a theorem of Gabber that on a quasi-projective scheme X,
every torsion element in H2
et(X, Gm) can be constructed from an Azumaya algebra
via (B.1.1). However, this fails for non-separated schemes. A theorem of Toen
[Toen] shows that in a very general situation, every Gm-gerbe arises from a derived
Azumaya algebra. Although Toen's theorem does not directly apply to T ∗(X ′/S),
it suggests that the derived category of D-modules on X (which is not the derived
category of D -mod(X ) in general) probably should be equivalent to the category
of modules over some derived Azumaya algebra Ddr
X /S on T ∗(X ′/S).
Let us sketch the construction of the Gm-gerbe DX /S on T ∗(X ′/S). As gerbes
satisfy smooth descent, it is enough to supply a Gm-gerbe (DX /S)U on T ∗(X /S)×X ′
U ′ for every U → X in Xsm and compatible isomorphisms for any β : U → V in
Xsm. But for any f : U → X in Xsm we have
(f ′
U )d : T ∗(X /S) ×X ′ U ′ → T ∗(U ′/S).
We have a Gm-gerbe DU/S on T ∗(U ′/S) corresponding to the sheaf of relative dif-
ferential operators DU/S . We define a Gm-gerbe (DX /S)U on T ∗(X /S) ×X ′ U ′ as
the pull back of DU/S along (f ′
U )d. One can check that these gerbes (DX /S)U are
compatible under pullbacks, and therefore define a Gm-gerbe DX /S on X .
Let f : X → Y be a schematic morphism between two smooth algebraic stacks.
From the above construction, the following lemma clearly follows from its scheme
theoretic version.
Lemma B.3.3 ([Trav]). (1) There is a canonical 1-morphism of Gm-gerbe on
T ∗(Y ′/S) ×Y ′ X ′
Mf : (f ′
p)∗DY /S ≃ (f ′
d)∗DX /S.
(2) For a pair of morphisms X
g
→ Z
h
→ Y and their composition f = h ◦ g :
X → Y , there is a canonical 1-morphisms of Gm-gerbe on T ∗(Y ′/S) ×Y ′ X ′
Mg,h : (f ′
p)∗DY /S ≃ (f ′
d)∗DX /S,
together with a canonical 2-morphism between Mh◦g and Mg,h.
(3) We have a canonical 1-morphism of Gm-gerbe on T ∗(X ′/S)sm:
DX /ST ∗(X ′/S)sm ≃ DT ∗(X ′/S)sm/S(θcan) := θ∗
can(DT ∗(X ′/S)sm/S),
where T ∗(X ′/S)sm is the maximal smooth open substack of T ∗(X ′/S) and θcan :
T ∗(X ′/S)sm → T ∗(T ∗(X ′/S)sm) is the canonical one form.
Let us discuss a stacky version of [OV, §4.3]. Let X /S be a smooth algebraic
stack as above and let Pic♮(X /S) be the Picard stack of invertible sheaves on X
equipped with a connection (i.e. objects in Pic♮(X /S) are D-modules on X whose
underlying quasi-coherent sheaves are invertible). Let B′
S = SectS(X ′, T ∗(X ′/S)).
Note that the following proposition does not need the representability of Pic♮(X /S).
Proposition B.3.4. (1) There is a natural morphism ψ : Pic♮(X /S) → B′
S.
(2) The pullback of the gerbe DX /S along
X ′ ×S Pic♮(X /S)
id×ψ
→ X ′ ×S B′
S → T ∗(X ′/S)
is canonically trivialized.
Proof. For (1), recall that if X is a scheme, the morphism ψ is given by the p-
curvature map (see [OV, §4.3]). We explain how to generalize this map to stacks.
Let U → X be a smooth morphism. Then via pullback, we obtain a morphism
Pic♮(X /S) → Pic♮(U/S) → SectS(U ′, T ∗(U ′/S)). By considering further pull-
backs to V = U ×X U , we find that the above maps fit into the following commu-
tative diagram
Pic♮(X /S)
−−−−→
Pic♮(U/S)
SectS(U ′, T ∗(X ′/S) ×X ′ U ′) −−−−→ SectS(U ′, T ∗(U ′/S)).
These ψU 's are compatible under pullbacks and define the π : Pic♮(X /S) → B′
S.
For (2), again let U → X be a smooth morphism. Note that the pullback
of the gerbe DU/S along U ′ ×S Pic♮(U/S) → T ∗(U ′/S) is canonically trivialized
by the object F∗(L, ∇), where (L, ∇) is the universal object on U ×S Pic♮(U/S).
Combining this with Lemma B.3.3 and the proof of part (i), this shows that the
ψUy
y
pullback of DX /S along U ′ ×S Pic♮(X /S) → X ′ ×S Pic♮(X /S) is canonically
trivialized. These trivializations glue together and give a canonical trivialization of
DX /S on X ′ ×S Pic♮(X /S).
(cid:3)
B.4. 1-forms. In this subsection we make a digression into the construction of
gerbes using 1-forms. We refer to [CZ, Appendix A.8] for more details. Recall that
for any smooth algebraic stack X /S we can associate to it a Gm-gerbe DX /S on
T ∗(X ′/S). Thus giving a 1-form θ : X ′ → T ∗(X ′/S) we can construct a Gm-gerbe
D(θ) := θ∗DX /S on X ′ by pulling back DX /S along θ.
When X = X is a smooth Noetherian scheme, above construction can be gener-
alized as follows. Let G be a smooth affine commutative group scheme over X. For
any section θ of Lie G′ ⊗ ΩX ′/S we can associate to it a G-gerbe D(θ) on X ′ using the
four term exact sequence constructed in loc. cit.. In the case G = Gm, the Gm-gerbe
D(θ) is isomorphic to θ∗DX,S the pull back of DX/S along θ : X ′ → T ∗(X ′/S). We
have the following functorial properties:
Lemma B.4.1.
(1) Let Y be another smooth algebraic stack over S and let f : Y → X be a
morphism. Let θ be a 1-form on X . There is a canonical equivalence of
Gm-gerbes on Y ′
f ′∗D(θ) ≃ D(f ′∗θ).
(2) Let X be a smooth Noetherian scheme and let φ : G → H be a morphism
of smooth commutative affine group schemes over X. For any section θ of
∗θ denote its image Lie H′ ⊗ ΩX ′/S under the map induced
Lie G′ ⊗ ΩX ′ let φ′
by φ. There is a canonical equivalence of H′-gerbes on X ′
D(θ)φ′
≃ D(φ′
∗θ),
where D(θ)φ′
is the H′-gerbe induced form D(θ) using the map φ′ (see A.6).
B.5. Azumaya property of differential operators on good stacks. Recall
that a smooth algebraic stack X over S of relative dimension d is called relatively
good if it satisfies the following equivalent properties:
(1) dim(T ∗(X /S)) = 2d.
(2) codim{x ∈ X dim Aut(x) = n} > n for all n > 0.
(3) For any U → X in Xsm, the complex
has cohomology concentrated in degree 0 and
Sym(TU/X → TU/S)
H 0(Sym(TU/X → TU/S )) ≃ Sym(TU/S)/TU/X Sym(TU/S).
The following proposition is proved in [BB] (see also [Trav]).
Proposition B.5.1. Let X be a relatively good stack. Let πX : T ∗(X /S) → X
be the natural projection and πX ′ be its Frobenius twist. Let T ∗(X ′/S)0 be the
maximal smooth open substack of T ∗(X ′/S). Then
(1) There is a natural coherent sheaf of algebras DX /S on T ∗(X ′/S) such that
the restriction of DX /S to T ∗(X ′/S)0 is an Azumaya algebra on T ∗(X ′/S)0
of rank p2 dim(X /S).
(2) The Gm-gerbe D 0
of splittings of D0
X /S := DX /ST ∗(X ′/S)0 is isomorphic to D
X /S. In particular, we have
X /S -mod ≃ QCoh(D 0
X /S)1.
D0
D0
X /S
, the gerbe
Remark B.5.2. By Proposition B.3.1, the category D0
a localization of the category of D-modules on X .
X /S -mod can be thought as
Appendix C. Abelian Duality
C.1. Abelian duality for Beilinson's 1-motives. Assume that S is a scheme
and pOS = 0. Let A be a Picard stack over S. In this subsection, we denote the
A ′ be the
base change of A along F rS : S → S by A ′ instead of A (S). Let T∗
e
vector bundle on S, which is the restriction of the relative (to S) cotangent bundle
of A ′ along e : S → A ′. Then there is a canonical isomorphism
A ′ ×S T∗
e
A ′ ≃ T ∗(A ′/S).
Therefore, via the map πS : T ∗(A ′/S) ≃ A ′ ×S T∗
e
a Picard stack over T∗
e
A ′ and we denote by mS the multiplication map:
A ′ → T∗
e
A ′, T ∗(A ′/S) becomes
mS : T ∗(A ′/S) ×T∗
e
A ′ T ∗(A ′/S) → T ∗(A ′/S).
Recall that it makes sense to talk about a gerbe on a Picard stack with a commutative
group structure (cf. A.5.2).
Lemma C.1.1. The gerbe DA /S on T ∗(A ′/S) admits a canonical commutative
group structure.
Proof. Let us sketch the construction of the multiplicative structure M and the
2-morphisms γ and i in A.5.2. The multiplication m : A ×S A → A , which induces
T ∗(A ′/S) ×A ′ (A ′ ×S A ′)
md
T ∗(A ′ ×S A ′/S)
.
mp
T ∗(A ′/S)
Observe that the map md : T ∗(A ′/S) ×A ′ (A ′ ×S A ′) → T ∗(A ′ ×S A ′/S) ≃
T ∗(A ′/S) ×S T ∗(A ′/S) induces an isomorphism
A ′ T ∗(A ′/S) → T ∗(A ′/S)×S T ∗(A ′/S).
T ∗(A ′/S)×A ′ (A ′ ×S A ′) ≃ T ∗(A ′/S)×T∗
Under this isomorphism mp becomes the multiplication map mS. Now the canonical
1-morphism between m∗
DA /S and DA /S ⊠DA /S comes from Lemma B.3.3. We have
S
two different factorizations of the multiplicative morphism A ×S A ×S A → A and
the 2-morphisms γ comes from the 2-morphisms for corresponding equivalences of
Lemma B.3.3. Finally, the 2-morphism i : σ∗M ≃ M can be constructed by applying
Lemma B.3.3 to the morphism A ×S A
(cid:3)
σ
→ A ×S A
m
→ A .
e
Now we assume that A is a Beilinson's 1-motive and is good when regarded
as an algebraic stack. Let A ♮ := Pic♮(A ) be the Picard stack of multiplicative
A ′
invertible sheaves on A with a connection (cf.
be the p-curvature morphism as given in Proposition B.3.4 (1). By [OV, §4.3],
there is a natural action of T ∗(A ′/S)∨ ≃ (A ′)∨ ×S T∗
A ′ on A ♮. Concretely, for
e
any b : U → T∗
A ′ U consist of multiplicative line bundles
e
[Lau]), and let ψS : A ♮ → T∗
e
A ′ objects in A ♮ ×T∗
e
/
/
on A ×S U with a connection whose p-curvature is equal to b. Then for any L′ ∈
(A ′)∨ ×S U ≃ T ∗(A ′/S)∨ ×S U and (L, ∇) ∈ A ♮ ×B′
U we define
S
L′ · (L, ∇) := (F ∗
A L′ ⊗ L, ∇F ∗
A L′ ⊗ ∇),
A L′ is the canonical connection on F ∗
A L′ giving by the Cartier descent.
where ∇F ∗
It also follows from the Cartier descent that A ♮ is a T (A ′/S)∨-torsor under this
action.
On the other hand, recall that for a Gm-gerbe D with commutative group struc-
ture on a Beilinson's 1-motive P, we defined the P ∨-torsor TD of multiplicative
splittings of D (cf. A.7).
Proposition C.1.2. There is a canonical (T ∗(A ′/S))∨-equivariant isomorphism
A ♮ → TDA /S .
Proof. We sketch the proof. Write TDA /S by TD for simplicity. Recall that for
A ′ T ∗(A ′/S)
U → T∗
e
which are compatible with the commutative group structure of DA /S. Note that
A ′, TDA(U ) is the groupoid of splittings of DA /S over U ×T∗
e
U ×T∗
e
A ′ T ∗(A ′/S) ≃ U ×T∗
e
A ′ (T∗
e
A ′ ×S A ′) ≃ A ′ ×S U,
and under this isomorphism, the projection of left hand side to the second factor is
identified with
A ′ ×S U → A ′ ×S A ♮ → T ∗(A ′/S).
Now by Lemma B.3.4, the pull back of DA /S to A ′ ×S U has a canonical splitting
LU,α. Moreover, one can check that this canonical splitting is compatible with the
commutative group structure of DA /S. Thus the assignment (U, α) → LU,α defines
a map from A ♮ to TD which is compatible with their T (A ′/S)∨-torsor structures
hence an equivalence.
(cid:3)
As a corollary, we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem C.1.3. Let A be a good Beilinson's 1-motive. Then there is a canonical
equivalence of categories
Db(D -mod(A )) ≃ Db(QCoh(A ♮)).
Proof. This is the combination of Theorem A.7.2 and Proposition B.5.1.
(cid:3)
Remark C.1.4. Note that in [Lau], this theorem is proved for abelian schemes
over S of characteristic zero. In fact, Laumon's construction applies to any "good"
Beilinson's 1-motive over a locally noetherian base. When pOS = 0, it is easy to see
that Laumon's equivalence and the equivalence constructed above are the same.
In particular, let θ : A ′ → T∗A ′ be a section obtained by base change τ : S →
A ′. Let DA /S(θ) := θ∗DA /S. Then DA /S,θ is a Gm-gerbe on A ′ equipped with a
T∗
e
canonical commutative group structure, and the A ′∨-torsor TDA /S,θ of multiplica-
tive splittings can be identified with A ♮ ×T∗
A ′,τ S.
e
C.2. A variant. In the main body of the paper, however, we need a variant of the
above construction. Let k be an algebraically closed field of characteristic p. For a k-
scheme X, we denote by X ′ its Frobenius base change along F r : k → k. Let S be a
smooth k-scheme. For an S-scheme X → S, we denote by X (S) its base change along
F rS : S → S. Let A → S be a Picard stack with multiplication m : A ×S A → A .
The goal of this subsection is to construct certain multiplicative gerbe DA (θ) on A ′
(rather than on A (S) as done at the end of the previous subsection).
Let θ : A ′ → T ∗A ′ be a section, where T ∗A ′ is the cotangent bundle of A ′
relative to k. We say θ is multiplicative if the upper right corner of the following
diagram is commutative
T ∗A ′ × T ∗A ′
T ∗A ′ × T ∗A ′A ′×S′ A ′
/ T ∗(A ′ ×S ′ A ′)
θ×θ
A ′ × A ′
θ×θ
md
A ′ ×S ′ A ′
m∗θ
T ∗A ′ ×A ′ (A ′ ×S ′ A ′)
m
A ′
θ
mp
/ T ∗A ′.
Let DA (θ) = θ∗DA be the pullback of DA to A ′. Then by the same argument as
in Lemma C.1.1, we have
Lemma C.2.1. (See also [BB, Lemma 3.16]) Let θ : A ′ → T ∗A ′ be a multiplicative
section. Then DA (θ) is a Gm-gerbe on A ′ with a commutative group structure.
References
[Ar] D. Arinkin: Appendix to [DP2].
[AG] D. Arinkin, D. Gaitsgory: Singular support of coherent sheaves, and the geometric Langlands
conjecture, arXiv:1201.6343.
[BD] A. Beilinson, V. Drinfeld: Quantization of Hitchin's integrable system and Hecke eigensheaves,
preprint, available at http://www.math.uchicago.edu/earinkin/langlands/
[BB] R. Bezrukavnikov, A. Braverman: Geometric Langlands conjecture in characteristic p: The
GLn case , Pure Appl. Math. Q. 3 (2007), no. 1, Special Issue: In honor of Robert D. MacPher-
son. Part 3, 153-179.
[BMR] R. Bezrukavnikov, I. Mirkovi´c, D. Rumynin: Localization of modules for a semisimple Lie
algebra in prime characteristic (with an appendix by R. Bezrukavnikov and S. Riche), Ann. of
Math. (2) 167 (2008), no. 3, 945-991.
[BT] R. Bezrukavnikov, R. Travkin: Quantization of Hitchin integrable system via positive charac-
teristic, in preparation.
[BLR] S. Bosch, W. Lutkebohmert, M. Raynaud: N´eron models, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und
ihrer Grenzgebiete (3), 21. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990.
[Br] S. Brochard: Foncteur de Picard d'un champ alg´ebrique, Mathematische Annalen March 2009,
Volume 343, Issue 3, 541-602.
[CZ] T.-H. Chen, X. Zhu: Non-abelian Hodge theory for curves in characteristic p, Geometric and
Functional Analysis, Volume 25 (2015), pp 1706-1733.
[DG] R. Donagi, D. Gaitsgory: The gerbe of Higgs bundles, Transformation groups Volume 7,
Number 2, 109-153.
[DP1] R. Donagi, T. Pantev: Langlands duality for Hitchin systems, Invent. Math. 189 (2012)
653-735.
[DP2] R. Donagi, T. Pantev: Torus fibrations, gerbes, and duality (with an appendix by Dmitry
Arinkin), Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 193 (2008), no. 901.
[Del] P. Deligne: La formule de dualit´e globale, in SGA 4, tome 3, Expose XVIII, Lecture Notes in
Mathematics, vol. 305, 481-587. Springer-Verlag, 1973.
o
o
/
O
O
o
o
O
O
/
/
O
O
/
[FGV] E. Frenkel, D. Gaitsgory, K. Vilonen: Whittaker Patterns in the Geometry of Moduli Spaces
of Bundles on Curves, Annals of Mathematics Second Series, Vol. 153, No. 3 (May, 2001), pp.
699-748.
[FW] E. Frenkel, E. Witten: Geometric Endoscopy and Mirror Symmetry, Communications in
Number Theory and Physics, 2 (2008) 113-283.
[Ga] D. Gaitsgory: Outline of the proof of the geometric Langlands conjecture for GL2, arXiv:
1302.2506.
[Groe] M. Groechenig: Moduli of flat connections in positive characteristic, arXiv:1201.0741.
[H] N. Hitchin: Stable bundles and integrable systems, Duke Math. J. 54 (1987), no. 1, 91-114.
[HT] T. Hausel and M. Thaddeus: Mirror symmetry, Langlands duality, and the Hitchin system,
Invent. Math., 153 (1):197-229, 2003.
[LB] G. Laumon, L. Moret-Bailly: Champs alg´ebriques, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Gren-
zgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics, 39. Springer-Verlag, Berlin,
2000.
[Lau] G. Laumon: Transformation de Fourier generalisee , arXiv:alg-geom/9603004.
[LB] L. Breen: Un th´eoreme d'annulation pour certains Ext de faisceaux ab´eliens, Ann. Sc. Ec.
Norm. Sup. 5, 339-352 (1975).
[Mu1] S. Mukai: Duality between D(X) and D( X) with its application to Picard sheaves, Nagoya
Math. J., 1981, 153-175.
[Mu2] S. Mukai: Fourier functor and its application to the moduli of bundles on an abelian variety,
Algebraic geometry, Sendai, 1985, Adv. Stud. Pure Math 3.6.1.
[N1] B.C. Ngo: Hitchin fibration and endoscopy , Invent. Math. 164 (2006) 399-453.
[N2] B.C. Ngo: Le lemme fondamental pour les alg'ebres de Lie, Publ. Math., Inst. Hautes ´Etud.
Sci., No. 111 (2010), 1-169.
[OV] A. Ogus, V. Vologodsky: Nonabelian Hodge theory in characteristic p , Publ. Math., Inst.
Hautes ´Etud. Sci., No. 106 (2007), 1-138.
[OZ] D. Osipov, X. Zhu: A categorical proof of the Parshin reciprocity laws on algebraic surfaces,
Algebra Number Theory 5 (2011), no. 3, 289-337.
[Toen] B. Toen: Derived Azumaya algebras and generators for twisted derived categories, Invent.
Math. 189 (2012), 581-652.
[Trav] R. Travkin: Quantum geometric Langlands in positive characteristic, arXiv:1110.5707.
[Yun] Z. Yun:Global Springer theory, Advances in Mathematics 228 (2011) 266-328.
Department of Mathematics, Northwestern University, 2033 Sheridan Road, Evanston,
IL 60208, USA
E-mail address: [email protected]
Department of Mathematics, California Institute of Techonology, 1200 E. Cali-
fornia Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
E-mail address: [email protected]
|
1603.02227 | 1 | 1603 | 2016-03-07T19:45:26 | Non-Degeneracy of Kobayashi Volume Measures for Singular Directed Varieties | [
"math.AG",
"math.CV"
] | In this note, we prove the generic Kobayashi volume measure hyperbolicity of singular directed varieties $(X, V)$, as soon as the canonical sheaf $\mathcal{K}\_V$ of $V$ is big in the sense of Demailly. | math.AG | math |
Non-Degeneracy of Kobayashi Volume Measures for
Singular Directed Varieties
Ya Deng
Abstract
In this note, we prove the generic Kobayashi volume measure hyperbolicity of singular
directed varieties (X, V ), as soon as the canonical sheaf KV of V is big in the sense of
Demailly.
1
Introduction
Let (X, V ) be a complex directed manifold, i.e X is a complex manifold equipped with a holo-
morphic subbundle V ⊂ TX. Demailly's philosophy in introducing directed manifolds is that,
there are certain fonctorial constructions which work better in the category of directed mani-
folds (ref. [Dem12]), even in the "absolute case", i.e. the case V = TX. Therefore, it is usually
inevitable to allow singularities of V , and V can be seen as a coherent subsheaf of TX such
that TX /V is torsion free. In this case V is a subbundle of TX outside an analytic subset of
codimension at least 2, which is denoted by Sing(V ). The Kobayashi volume measure can also
be defined for (singular) directed manifolds.
Definition 1.1. Let (X, V ) be a directed manifold with dim(X) = n and rank(V ) = r. Then
the Kobayashi volume measure of (X, V ) is the pseudometric defined on any ξ ∈ ∧rVx for
x /∈ Sing(V ), by
er
X,V (ξ) := inf{λ > 0; ∃f : Br → X, f (0) = x, λf∗(τ0) = ξ, f∗(TBr ) ⊂ V },
where Br is the unit ball in Cr and τ0 = ∂
say that (X, V ) is generic volume measure hyperbolic if er
∂t1 ∧ ··· ∂
∂tr
is the unit r-vector of Cr at the origin. We
X,V is generically positive definite.
In [Dem12] the author also introduced the definition of canonical sheaf KV for any singular
directed variety (X, V ), and he showed that the "bigness" of KV will imply that, any non-
constant entire curve f : C → (X, V ) must satisfy certain global algebraic differential equations.
In this note, we will study the Kobayashi volume measure of the singular directed variety (X, V ),
and give another intrinsic explanation for the bigness of KV . Our main theorem is as follows:
Theorem 1.1. Let (X, V ) be a compact complex directed variety (V is singular) with rank(V ) =
r and dim(X) = n.
If V is of general type (see Definition 2.1 below), with the base locus
Bs(V ) ( X (see also Definition 2.1), then Kobayashi volume measure of (X, V ) is non-degenerate
outside Bs(V ). In particular (X, V ) is generic volume measure hyperbolic.
Remark 1.1. In the absolute case, Theorem 1.1 is proved in [Gri71] and [KO71]; for the smooth
directed variety it is proved in [Dem12].
1
2 Proof of main theorem
Proof. Since the singular set Sing(V ) of V is an analytic set of codimension ≥ 2, the top
exterior power ∧rV of V is a coherent sheaf of rank 1, and is included in its bidual ∧rV ∗∗, which
is an invertible sheaf (of course, a line bundle). We will give an explicit construction of the
multiplicative cocycle which represent the line bundle ∧rV ∗∗.
Since V ⊂ TX is a coherent sheaf, we can take an open covering {Uα} satisfying that on
each Uα one can find sections e(α)
kα ∈ Γ(Uα, TXUα) which generate the coherent sheaf V
on Uα. Thus the sections e(α)
ir ∈ Γ(Uα,∧rTXUα) with (i1, . . . , ir) varying among all
r-tuples of (1, . . . , kα) generate the coherent sheaf ∧rV Uα, which is a subsheaf of ∧rTXUα. Let
v(α)
is
I
contained in Sing(V ), and thus all v(α)
are proportional outside Sing(V ). Therefore there exists
a unique vα ∈ Γ(Uα,∧rTXUα), and holomorphic functions {λI} which do not have common
factors, such that v(α)
I = λI vα for all I. By this construction we can show that on Uα ∩ Uβ, vα
and vβ coincide up to multiplication by a nowhere vanishing holomorphic function, i.e.
ir , then by Cod(Sing(V )) ≥ 2 we know that the common zero of all v(α)
1 , . . . , e(α)
i1 ∧ ··· ∧ e(α)
:= e(α)
i1 ∧ ··· ∧ e(α)
I
I
vα = gαβvβ
on Uα ∩ Uβ 6= ∅, where gαβ ∈ O∗
X (Uα ∩ Uβ). This multiplicative cocycle {gαβ} corresponds to
the line bundle ∧rV ∗∗. Then fix a Kahler metric ω on X, it will induce a metric Hr on ∧rTX
and thus also induce a singular hermitian metric hs of ∧rV ∗∗∗ whose local weight ϕα is equal
to log vα2
Hr . It is easy to show that hs has analytic singularities, and the set of singularities
Sing(hs) = Sing(V ). Indeed, we have Sing(hs) = ∪α{p ∈ Uαvα(p) = 0}. Now we make the
following definition.
Definition 2.1. With the notions above, V is called to be of general type if there exists a
singular metric h on ∧rV ∗∗∗ with analytic singularities satisfying the following two conditions:
(1) The curvature current Θh ≥ ǫω, i.e., it is a Kahler current.
(2) h is more singular than hs, i.e., there exists a globally defined quasi-psh function χ which is
bounded from above such that
eχ · h = hs.
Since h and hs has both analytic singularities, χ also has analytic singularities, and thus eχ is
a continuous function. Moreover, eχ(p) > 0 if p /∈ Sing(h). We define the base locus of V to be
Bs(V ) := ∩hSing(h),
where h varies among all singular metric on ∧rV ∗∗∗ satisfying the Properties (1) and (2) above.
Now fix a point p /∈ Bs(V ), then by Definition 2.1 we can find a singular metric h with
Let f be any holomorphic map from the unit ball Br ⊂ Cr to (X, V ) such that f (0) = p,
analytic singularities satisfying the Property (1) and (2) above, and p /∈ Sing(h).
then locally we have
f∗(
∂
∂t1 ∧ ··· ∧
∂
∂tr
) = a(α)(t) · vαf ,
2
where a(α)(t) is meromorphic functions, with poles contained in f −1(Sing(V )), and satisfies
Since f∗( ∂
∂t1 ∧ ··· ∧ ∂
∂tr
∂
∂t1 ∧ ··· ∧
∂
∂tr
)2
ω = a(α)(t)2 · vα2
f∗(
) can be seen as a (meromorphic!) section of f ∗ ∧r V ∗∗, then we define
δ(t) := f∗(
h−1 = a(α)(t)2 · eφα,
)2
∂
∂t1 ∧ ··· ∧
Hr ≤ C.
∂
∂tr
where φα is the local weight of h. By Property (2) above, we have a globally defined quasi-psh
function χ on X which is bounded from above such that
δ(t) = eχ · f∗(
∂
∂t1 ∧ ··· ∧
∂
∂tr
)2
ω ≤ C1.
Now we define a semi-positive metric eγ on Br by putting eγ := f ∗ω, then we have
f∗( ∂
∂t1 ∧ ··· ∧ ∂
∂tr
)ω
≤ C0(f (t)),
(2.1)
(2.2)
deteγ
where C0(z) is a bounded function on X which does not depend on f , and we take C2 to be its
upper bound. One can find a conformal λ(t) to define γ = λeγ satisfying
det γ = δ(t)
2 .
1
Combined (2.1) and (2.2) togother we obtain
λ ≤ C
1
r
2 · e
χ
2r .
Since Θh ≥ ǫω, by (2.1) we have
ddc log det γ ≥
f ∗ω =
ǫ
2
ǫ
2λ
γ ≥
ǫ
2C
1
r
2
e− χ◦f
2r γ.
By Property (2) in Definition 2.1 of h, there exists a constant C3 > 0 such that
e− χ
2r ≥ C3.
Let A := ǫC3
1
r
2C
2
, and we know that it is a constant which does not depend on f . Then by
Ahlfors-Schwarz Lemma (see Lemma 2.1 below) we have
A
Since p /∈ Sing(h), then we have eχ(p) > 0, and thus
r + 1
)2r.
δ(0) ≤ (
∂
∂t1 ∧ ··· ∧
∂
∂tr
f∗(
)2
ω(0) ≤ e−χ(p)δ(0) = e−χ(p) · (
r + 1
A
)2r.
By the arbitrariness of f , and Definition 1.1, we conclude that (X, V ) is generic volume measure
hyperbolic and er
X,V is non-degenerate outside Bs(V ).
3
Lemma 2.1 (Ahlfors-Schwarz). Let γ = √−1P γjk(t)dtj∧dtk be an almost everywhere positive
hermitian form on the ball B(0, R) ⊂ Cr of radius R, such that
−Ricci(γ) := √−1∂∂ log det γ ≥ Aγ
in the sense of currents for some constant A > 0. Then
det(γ)(t) ≤ (
r + 1
AR2 )r
1
R2 )r+1
(1 − t2
.
Remark 2.1. If V is regular, then V is of general type if and only if ∧rV is a big line bundle.
In this situation, the base locus Bs(V ) = B+(∧rV ), where B+(∧rV ) is the augmented base locus
for the big line bundle ∧rV (ref. [Laz04]).
With the notions above, we define the coherent ideal sheaf I(V ) to be germ of holomorphic
functions which is locally bounded with respect to hs, i.e., I(V ) is the integral closure of the ideal
generated by the coefficients of vα in some local trivialization in ∧rTX. Let ∧rV ∗∗∗ be denoted
by KV , and KV := KV ⊗ I(V ), then KV is the canonical sheaf of (X, V ) defined in [Dem12]. It
is easy to show that the zero scheme of I(V ) is equal to Sing(hs) = Sing(V ). KV is called to be
a big sheaf iff for some log resolution µ : eX → X of I(V ) with µ∗I(V ) = O eX (−D), µ∗KV − D
is big in the usual sense. Now we have the following statement:
Proposition 2.1. V is of general type if and only if KV is big. Moreover, we have
Bs(V ) ⊂ µ(B+(µ∗KV − D)) ∪ Sing(hs) = µ(B+(µ∗KV − D)) ∪ Sing(V ).
Proof. From Definition 2.1, the condition that KV is a big sheaf implies that KV and µ∗KV − D
are both big line bundles. For m ≫ 0, we have the following isomorphism
µ∗ : H 0(X, (mKV − A) ⊗ I(V )m)
(2.3)
Fix an very ample divisor A, then for m ≫ 0, the base locus (in the usual sense) B(mµ∗KV −
mD − µ∗A) is stably contained in B+(µ∗KV − D) (ref. [Laz04]). Thus we can take a m ≫ 0
to choose a basis s1, . . . , sk ∈ H 0(eX, mµ∗KV − mD − µ∗A), whose common zero is contained in
B+(µ∗KV − D). Then by (2.3) there exists {ei}1≤i≤k ⊂ H 0(X, (mKV − A) ⊗ I(V )m) such that
≈−→ H 0(eX, mµ∗KV − µ∗A − mD).
µ∗(ei) = si.
ξ2
hm
1
:=
Then we can define a singular metric hm on mKV − A by putting ξ2
i=1 ei2 for ξ ∈
Pk
(mKV − A)x. We take a smooth metric hA on A such that the curvature ΘA ≥ ǫω is a smooth
Kahler form. Then h := (hmhA)
m defines a singular metric on KV with analytic singularities,
such that its curvature current Θh ≥ 1
m ΘA. From the construction we know that h is more
singular than hs, and Sing(h) ⊂ µ(B+(µ∗KV − D)) ∪ Sing(hs).
Remark 2.2. From Proposition 2.1 we can take Definition 2.1 as another equivalent definition
of the bigness of KV , and it is more analytic. From Theorem 1.1 we can replace the condition
that V is of general type by the bigness of KV , and it means that the definition of canonical
sheaf of singular directed varieties is very natural.
4
A direct consequence of Theorem 1.1 is the following corollary, which was suggested in
[GPR13]:
Corollary 2.1. Let (X, V ) be directed varieties with rank(V ) = r, and f be a holomorphic map
from Cr to (X, V ) with generic maximal rank. Then if KV is big, the image of f is contained in
Bs(V ) ( X.
The famous conjecture by Green-Griffiths stated that in the absolute case the converse of
Theorem 1.1 should be true. It is natural to ask whether we have similar results for any directed
varieties. A result by Marco Brunella (ref. [Bru10]) gives a weak converse of Theorem 1.1 for
1-directed variety:
Theorem 2.1. Let X be a compact Kahler manifold equipped with a singular holomorphic
foliation F by curves. Suppose that F contains at least one leaf which is hyperbolic, then the
canonical bundle KF is pseudoeffective.
Indeed, Brunella proved more than the results stated in the theorem above. By putting on
KF precisely the Poincar´e metric on the hyperbolic leaves, he construct a singular hermitian
metric h (maybe not with analytic singularities) on KF , such that the set of points where
h is unbounded locally are polar set Sing(F) ∪ Parab(F), where Parab(F) are the union of
parabolic leaves, and the curvature Θh of the metric h is a positive current. Therefore, it seems
that Brunella's theorem can be strengthened, i.e., not only KF is pseudo-effective, but also the
canonical sheaf KF is pseudoeffective. However, as is shown in the following example, even if
all the leaves of F are hyperbolic, the canonical sheaf can not be pseudoeffective.
Example 2.1. A foliation by curves of degree d on the complex projective space CP n is gener-
ated by a global section
s ∈ H 0(CP n, TCP n ⊗ O(d − 1)).
From the results by Lins Neto and Soares [LS96] and Brunella [Bru06], we know that a generic
one-dimensional foliation F of degree d satisfies the following property:
(a) the set of the singularities Sing(F) of F is discrete;
(b) each singularity p ∈ Sing(F) is non-degenerate, i.e. the Milnor number of F at p is 1;
(c) no d + 1 points in Sing(F) lie on a projective line;
(d) all the leaves of F are hyperbolic.
Hence the Baum-Bott formula states that
#Sing(F) = cn(TCP n + O(d − 1))
nXi=0
cn−i(CP n)c1(O(d − 1))i
(cid:18)n + 1
i + 1(cid:19)(d − 1)i
nXi=0
dn+1 − 1
d − 1
,
=
=
=
5
and thus the canonical sheaf KF = O(d − 1) ⊗ ISing(F ), where ISing(F ) is the maximal ideal of
Sing(F). By property (c) above it is easy to prove that for d ≫ 0 KF is not pseudo-effective.
Remark 2.3. In [McQ08] the author introduces the definition canonical singularities for fo-
liations, in dimension 2 this definition is equivalent to reduced singularities in the sense of
Seidenberg. The generic foliation by curves of degree d in CP n is another example of canonical
singularities. In this situation, one can not expect to improve the "bigness" of canonical sheaf
KF by blowing-up. Indeed, this birational model is "stable" in the sense that, π∗K eF = KF for
any birational model π : (eX, eF ) → (X,F). However, on the complex surface endowed with a
foliation F with reduced singularities, if f is an entire curve tangent to the foliation, and T [f ] is
the Ahlfors current associated with f , then in [McQ98] it is shown that the positivity of T [f ]·TF
can be improved by an infinite sequence of blowing-ups, due to the fact that certain singularities
of F appearing in the blowing-ups are "small", i.e. the lifted entire curve will not pass to these
singularities. Since T [f ] · TF is related to value distribution, and thus these small singularities
are negligible. In [Den16] this "Diophantine approximation" idea has been generalized to higher
dimensions.
Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor Professor Jean-Pierre Demailly
for stimulating exchanges and comments in this work. The author is supported by the China
Scholarship Council.
References
[Bru06] M. Brunella, Inexistence of invariant measures for generic rational differential equations
in the complex domain. Bol. Soc. Mat. Mexicana (3), 2006, 12(1): 43-49.
[Bru10] M. Brunella, Uniformisation of foliations by curves. Holomorphic dynamical systems.
Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010: 105-163.
[Dem12] J.P. Demailly, Kobayashi pseudo-metrics, entire curves and hyperbolicity of algebraic
varieties, Lecture notes in Summer School in Mathematics 2012.
[Dem14] J.P. Demailly, Towards the Green-Griffiths-Lang conjecture, arXiv:
1412.2986v2
[math.AG]
[Den16] Y. Deng, Degeneracy of entire curves into higher dimensional complex manifolds, in
preparation.
[GPR13] C. Gasbarri, G. Pacienza, E. Rousseau, Higher dimensional tautological inequalities
and applications. Mathematische Annalen, 2013, 356(2): 703-735.
[Gri71] P.A. Griffiths, Holomorphic mapping into canonical algebraic varieties. Annals of Math-
ematics, 1971: 439-458.
[KO71] S. Kobayashi, T. Ochiai, Mappings into compact complex manifolds with negative first
Chern class. Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan, 1971, 23(1): 137-148.
6
[Laz04] R. Lazarsfeld, Positivity in algebraic geometry II. Springer-Verlag. 2004.
[LS96] A. Lins Neto, M.G. Soares, Algebraic solutions of one-dimensional foliations. Journal of
Differential Geometry, 1996, 43(3): 652-673.
[McQ98] M. McQuillan, Diophantine approximations and foliations. Publications Mathmatiques
de l'Institut des Hautes tudes Scientifiques, 1998, 87(1): 121-174.
[McQ08] M. McQuillan, Canonical models of foliations. Pure and applied mathematics quarterly,
2008, 4(3).
Institut Fourier & University of Science and Technology of China
Ya Deng
Email: [email protected]
7
|
1208.4129 | 2 | 1208 | 2012-12-20T05:51:34 | Grothendieck ring class of Banana and Flower graphs | [
"math.AG"
] | We define a special type of hypersurface varieties inside $\mathbb{P}_k^{n-1}$ arising from connected planar graphs and then find their equivalence classes inside the Gr\"othendieck ring of projective varieties. Then we find a characterization for graphs in order to define irreducible hypersurfaces in general. | math.AG | math |
Grothendieck ring class of Banana and Flower
graphs
Pedro Morales-Almaz´an
Pedro [email protected]
Abstract
We define a special type of hypersurface varieties inside Pn−1
arising
from connected planar graphs and then find their equivalence classes inside
the Grothendieck ring of projective varieties. Then we find a characteri-
zation for graphs in order to define irreducible hypersurfaces in general.
k
1 Introduction
This is result from a short communication session from the summer school Ap-
plications of Algebra and Topology in Quantum Field Theory held in Villa de
Leyva, Colombia during the summer of 2011.
The first three sections are mainly based on [1].
In the first section we
introduce the concept of the Grothendieck ring of varieties together with some
important results in this ring such as the inclusion-exclusion principle. In the
second section we define a graph polynomial and a graph hypersurface and find
some special properties about such polynomials. The third section is mainly
concerned with the Grothendieck class of some special type of graphs, namely
star, flower, polygon and banana graphs.
In section four we explore graph
hypersurfaces for graphs in general and find a necessary and sufficient condition
for a graph to produce an irreducible graph hypersurface.
2 Grothendieck Ring of Varieties
The Grothendieck ring of varieties can be thought as a generalization of the
Euler characteristic, [4]. It can be thought of as the quotient of the free abelian
group generated by isomorphism classes [X] of k-varieties, modulo inclusion-
exclusion type relations, together with the product of two classes given by the
class of the product, [1, 4].
We start off with a characteristic zero field k and the the category of algebraic
varieties Vk defined over it. Then we look at the abelian group K0(Vk) of
isomorphism classes [X] of varieties X over the field k with the relations
[X] − [Y ] = [X \ Y ],
(1)
1
where Y ⊂ X is a closed subvariety of X. Notice that setting X = Y gives that
the Grothendieck class of the empty set is zero,
[∅] = 0 .
(2)
K0(Vk) is called the Grothendieck group of varieties which then can be turned
into a ring by defining the product of two isomorphism classes by
[X] · [Y ] = [X × Y ].
(3)
This can be also thought of as the quotient of the free abelian group gener-
ated by the symbols [X] by the relation (1) and with the product (3), [4].
The use of the Grothendieck ring of varieties is very useful when looking for
invariants. We call an additive invariant a map χ : Vk → R, with values on a
commutative ring R, that satisfies
1. χ(X) = χ(Y ) if X and Y are isomorphic
2. χ(X \ Y ) = χ(X) − χ(Y ), for Y ⊂ X closed
3. χ(X × Y ) = χ(X)χ(Y )
Thus, an additive invariant is the same as a ring homomorphism χ from
the Grothendieck ring of varieties to the ring R, [1]. Some interesting additive
invariants are the Euler characteristic, as mentioned before, and the Hodge
polynomial, [1, 4].
For the following discussion, let L = [A1
k] be the equivalence class in the
Grothendieck ring of varieties of the one dimensional affine space A1
k. From the
product (3) of K0(Vk) we have that the Grothendieck class of the affine spaces
An
k are given in terms of L as
[An
k ] = Ln .
(4)
Also, let T be the class of the multiplicative group k×, which is just A1
k
without a point. Thus we have that
T = [A1
k] − [A0
k] = L − 1,
(5)
where 1 is the class of a point in K0(Vk).
L and T are useful to find the Grothendieck class of a variety together with
the inclusion-exclusion principle
Theorem 2.1 (Inclusion-Exclusion Principle). Let X, Y be varieties over k,
then
[X ∪ Y ] = [X] + [Y ] − [X ∩ Y ]
(6)
Proof. Since we have that X \ (X ∩ Y ) = (X ∪ Y ) \ Y , then
[X] − [X ∩ Y ] = [X \ (X ∩ Y )] = [(X ∪ Y ) \ Y ] = [X ∪ Y ] − [Y ] ,
(7)
and hence the result follows.
2
From this we find as a corollary the classes the projective spaces,
Corollary 2.2. We have that
[Pn
k ] =
Ln+1 − 1
L − 1
,
(8)
where the fraction is taken as a short hand notation for the corresponding sum-
mation.
Proof. Since Pn+1
result, we have that
k
\ An+1
k ≃ Pn
k for all n ∈ N, by induction and the previous
[Pn
k ] = 1 + L + L2 + · · · + Ln ,
(9)
from which the result follows.
3 Graphs
3.1 Graph Hypersufaces
In this section, let Γ be a connected planar graph with n edges and label them
with the variables t1, t2, . . . , tn of the polynomial ring Z[t1, t2, . . . , tn]. With
this, define the graph polynomial associated to Γ by
ΨΓ(t) = XT ⊂Γ Ye /∈E(T )
te ,
(10)
where T is runs through all spanning trees of Γ and E(T ) is the set of all edges
of T .
For a graph with v vertices, the pigeon hole principle gives that all spanning
trees have v−1 edges, as otherwise there would be a cycle. Hence the polynomial
ΨΓ(t) is a homogeneous polynomial of degree n − v + 1 and one can define the
graph hypersurface associated to the graph Γ by
XΓ = {t = (t1 : t2 : · · · : tn) ∈ Pn−1
k
ΨΓ(t) = 0} .
(11)
Since ΨΓ(t) is homogeneous, XΓ is well defined as a projective variety.
3.2 Dual Graph
Given a planar connected graph Γ, define the dual graph Γ∨ by the following:
1. embed Γ in S2
2. for each region defined by Γ on S2 assign a vertex of Γ∨
3. if two regions share an edge, join the corresponding vertices on Γ∨
3
This definition depends on the particular embedding used. Different em-
beddings of the same graph Γ might lead to different dual graphs Γ∨, but the
resulting graph polynomials ΨΓ∨(t) are the same up to relabeling. This fact
follows from the relation between the graph polynomial of Γ and the graph
polynomial of the dual Γ∨ via the Cremona transformation described below,
[1, 2]. This makes the graph hypersurface of the dual graph XΓ∨ a well defined
object.
3.3 Cremona Transformation
The Cremona transformation on Pn−1
k
is given by
C : Pn−1
k
k → Pn−1
1
t2
t1
:
(t1 : t2 : · · · : tn) 7→(cid:18) 1
: · · · :
1
tn(cid:19)
which is well defined outside the coordinate hyperplanes
Σn =((t1 : t2 : · · · : tn) ∈ Pn−1
k
ti = 0) .
n
Yi=1
(12)
(13)
(14)
This Cremona transform is useful to relate the graph hypersurfaces of a graph
Γ and its dual Γ∨. For this, consider the graph of the Cremona transform in
Pn−1
k × Pn−1
and define G(C) to be its closure. Then we have the two projections
π1 and π2 of G(C) into Pn−1
related by
k × Pn−1
k
k
C ◦ π1 = π2 .
(15)
G(C) is then a closed subvariety of Pn−1
k × Pn−1
k
Lemma 1.1)
with equations (see [1],
t1tn+1 = t2tn+2 = · · · = tnt2n ,
(16)
where we used the coordinates (t1 : t2 : · · · : t2n) for Pn−1
k × Pn−1
k
.
Now, we have a relation between the graph polynomials of a graph Γ and
its dual Γ∨ given by
Proposition 3.1. Let Γ be a graph with n edges. Then the graph polynomials
of Γ and its dual Γ∨ are related by
ΨΓ(t) = n
Yi=1
ti! ΨΓ∨(cid:18) 1
t(cid:19) ,
(17)
and hence the corresponding graph hypersurfaces of Γ and Γ∨ are related via the
Cremona transformation by
C(cid:0)XΓ ∩(cid:0)Pn−1
k
\ Σn(cid:1)(cid:1) = XΓ∨ ∩(cid:0)Pn−1
k
\ Σn(cid:1)
Proof. The proof follows from the definition of the graph polynomial and the
combinatorial properties between Γ and Γ∨ (see [1], Lemma 1.3).
(18)
4
This result also gives an isomorphism between the graph hypersurfaces of Γ
and Γ∨ away from the coordinate hyperplanes which can be summarized in the
following
Corollary 3.1. Given a graph Γ, we have that the graph hypersurface of its
dual is
XΓ∨ = π2(π−1
1 (XΓ)) ,
(19)
where πi are the projections given on (15). Also, we have that the Cremona
transform gives a (biregular) isomorphism
C : XΓ \ Σn → XΓ∨ \ Σn ,
and the projection π2 : G(C) → Pn−1
k
restricts to an isomorphism
π2 : π−1
1
(XΓ \ Σn) → XΓ∨ \ Σn .
(20)
(21)
Proof. The result follows from Proposition 3.1 and the geometric properties of
G(C) (see [1], Lemma 1.2, Lemma 1.3, Corollary 1.4).
4 Banana and Flower graph hypersurfaces
4.1 Flower graphs
Let us start with the simplest of the graphs that define a graph hypersurface.
Let Γ be a star graph with n edges. Then
and hence
ΨΓ(t) = 1 ,
XΓ = ∅ .
(22)
(23)
On the other hand, the dual graph Γ∨ is a flower graph consisting with only one
vertex and n loops. Therefore the graph polynomial associated to Γ∨ is given
by
which shows that the graph hypersurface is
ΨΓ∨(t) = t1t2 · · · tn ,
XΓ∨ = {t ∈ Pn−1
k
ΨΓ∨(t) = 0} = Σn .
(24)
(25)
Therefore, by means of Corollary 3.1, we have an isomorphism between the
graph hypersurfaces of the star graph and the flower graph away from the co-
ordinate hyperplanes, which is indeed the case,
XΓ \ Σn = ∅ = XΓ∨ \ Σn .
From 2 we have that the Grothendieck class of XΓ is
[XΓ] = 0 .
(26)
(27)
Now, for XΓ∨ , recall that from 14, we have that the complement of Σn consists
of all tuples where all the elements are different from zero, which is a copy of
(k×)n−1 and gives the class of Tn−1.
5
Proposition 4.1. The Grothendieck class of Σn is given by
[XΓ∨] = [Σn] =
(1 + T)n − 1 − Tn
T
=
n−1
Xi=1(cid:18)n
i(cid:19)Tn−1−i .
(28)
Proof. Since XΓ∨ = Σn = Pn−1
of Grothendieck class, the relations given in (8) and (5).
k
\ (k×)n−1, the result follows from the definition
4.2 Banana graphs
The next interesting type of graphs that give rise to graph hypersurfaces are
the polygons. Let Γ be a polygon with n edges, i.e. a graph with n edges, n
vertices in which each vertex has degree 2. Here, the graph polynomial is then
given by
ΨΓ(t) = t1 + t2 + · · · + tn ,
and hence the graph hypersurface is the hyperplane
XΓ = {t ∈ Pn−1
k
t1 + t2 + · · · + tn = 0} =: L .
(29)
(30)
Notice that choosing any n−1 points for t1, t2, . . . , tn−1 in L gives a unique value
for tn, and hence we can identify L with Pn−2
. Thus we find the Groethendieck
class of L to be given by
k
[L] = [XΓ] = [Pn−2
k
] =
Ln−1 − 1
L − 1
=
(T + 1)n−1 − 1
T
.
(31)
The dual graph for Γ is a banana graph, which consists of 2 vertices of degree
n each, and n edges joining them. The corresponding graph polynomial is then
given by the (n − 1)−th elementary symmetrical polynomial in ti,
ΨΓ∨(t) = t2t3 · · · tn + t1t3 · · · tn + · · · + t1t2 · · · ti · · · tn + · · · + t1t2 · · · tn−1 , (32)
where ti means that the variable ti is omitted from the product. In order to
find its Grothendieck class, we first use the isomorphism between XΓ \ Σn and
XΓ∨ \ Σn to have
[XΓ \ Σn] = [XΓ∨ \ Σn] .
(33)
From this, we can find the class of XΓ \ Σ by studying L ∩ Σn . First, we need
a result that tells us how to find the Grothendieck class of a hyperplane section
of a given class in the Grothendieck ring.
Lemma 4.1. Let C be a class in the Grothendieck ring that can be written as
a function of the torus class T by means of a polynomial expression C = g(T).
Then the transformation
H : g(T) 7→
g(T) − g(−1)
T + 1
(34)
gives an operation on the set of classes in the Grothendieck ring that are polyno-
mial functions of the torus class T that can be interpreted as taking a hyperplane
section.
6
Proof. Notice that for g(T) = [Pn] =
(T − 1)n − 1
T
, equation (34) gives
g(T − g(−1))
T + 1
=
(T − 1)n−1 − 1
T
= [Pn−1] ,
(35)
which effectively is the same as taking a hyperplane section. Since H is linear
in g, it works for any g.
Since [Σn] = (T+1)n−1−Tn
T
= g(T), using the previous result gives that
[L ∩ Σn] =
g(T) − g(−1)
T + 1
=
(1 + T)n−1 − 1
T
−
Tn−1 − (−1)n−1
T + 1
and with this, we find that
[XΓ∨ \ Σn] = [L \ Σn] = [L] − [L ∩ Σn] =
Tn−1 − (−1)n−1
T + 1
,
.
(36)
(37)
On the other hand, consider the variety Sn generated by the ideal
I = (t2t3 · · · tn, t1t3 · · · tn, . . . , t1t2 · · · ti · · · tn, . . . , t1t2 · · · tn−1) .
(38)
This is the singularity subvariety of the divisor of singular normal crossings Σn
given by the union of coordinate hyperplanes (see [1] Section 1.3).
We can find the Grothendieck class of Sn by
Lemma 4.2. The class of Sn is given by
[Sn] = [Σn] − nTn−2 =
n−1
Xi=2(cid:18)n
i(cid:19)Tn−1−i .
(39)
Proof. Each coordinate hyperplane Pn−2
in Σn intersects the others along the
union of its coordinate hyperplanes Σn−1. Thus, to obtain the class of Sn from
the class of Σn, we just need to subtract the class of n complements of Σn−1 in
the n components of Σn, from which the result follows.
k
Finally, this results lead to the Grothendieck class of the graph hypersurface
of the banana graph by
Theorem 4.3. The class of the graph hypersurface of the banana graph is given
by
[XΓ∨] =
Proof. Writing [XΓ∨] as
(T + 1)n − 1
Tn − (−1)n
T
T
−
− nTn−2 .
(40)
[XΓ∨] = [XΓ∨ \ Σ] + [XΓ∨ ∩ Σ] = [XΓ∨ \ Σ] + [Sn] ,
(41)
and using the previous results for [XΓ∨ \ Σ] and [Sn] we find the desired result.
7
5 Irreducible Graph Hypersurfaces
To start, notice that if a graph Γ produces a reducible graph hypersurface XΓ
so will its dual graph Γ∨.
Theorem 5.1. XΓ is irreducible if and only if XΓ∨ is irreducible.
Proof. This result follows directly from Proposition 3.1.
Even though every planar connected graph gives rise to a graph hypersur-
face, not every graph produces an irreducible graph hypersurface. To see this,
consider a planar connected graph Γ and following [3] define a separation to be
a decomposition of the graph into two subgraphs which share only one vertex.
This common vertex is called a separating vertex.
With this, we can give a relation between separating vertices and irreducibil-
ity of the graph hypersufaces by the following result
Theorem 5.2. If the graph Γ has a separating vertex such that each of the two
components contain a cycle, then the corresponding graph hypersurface XΓ is
reducible.
Proof. Let a be a separating vertex in Γ with the properties required. Consider
the two associated components of the graph separately. Since the components
do not share edges, the choice of edges to remove in order to achieve a spanning
tree on each component is independent of one another. Thus every spanning
tree of Γ can be obtained by spanning trees of the two components joint through
a. Then the graph polynomial for Γ is the product of the graph polynomials
of each component. Since each component contains a cycle, the corresponding
graph polynomials are non-constant, and hence XΓ is reducible.
The concept of independence in the graph is the key for reducibility. With
this discussion, we can refine the previous result by means of defining separa-
bility on graphs. A connected graph that has no separating vertices is called
non-separable, otherwise it is called separable. The next result, due to Whitney,
will provide the key ingredient to characterize reducibility on graph hypersur-
faces by means of graph theoretical properties of Γ.
Lemma 5.3. A connected graph is non-separable if and only if any two of its
edges lie on a common cycle.
Proof. The proof can be found in Theorem 5.2 in [3]. The result follows from
the definition of separating vertex and properties of cycles.
With this result, we can characterize reducibility of graph hypersurfaces.
Theorem 5.4. XΓ is reducible if and only if Γ is separable and each component
contains a cycle.
8
Proof. By Theorem 5.2 we have that if Γ is separable, and hence has a separating
vertex, the corresponding graph polynomial ΨΓ(t) is reducible.
Now, suppose that Γ is such that ΨΓ(t) is reducible. Thus
ΨΓ(t) = p(t)q(t)
(42)
for p(t) and q(t) non constant polynomials. Now, let ti = x be variable and fix
all other tj, j 6= i. Therefore ΨΓ(x) is a linear polynomial, and hence either p(x)
or q(x) is a constant for any choice of tj. Without loss of generality, suppose that
p(x) is a constant and that q(x) is a linear polynomial. Now regard p(x) and
q(x) as polynomials in x whose coefficients depend on tj. Since the coefficient
of x in q(x) is non-zero for our initial choice of tj, by continuity on tj it remains
non-zero in a neighborhood of these initial values. Hence the coefficient of x in
p(x) is zero for a neighborhood of tj, and since p(t) is a polynomial, p(x) must
be constant for all tj.
Therefore, we have that p(t) and q(t) separate the variables t1, t2, . . . , tn,
that is, if ti is present in p(t), then it is not in q(t). Hence we have that p(t) and
q(t) are homogeneous polynomials where the exponent of each ti is at most 1.
Since p(t) and q(t) separate the variables ti associated to the edges of Γ,
the choice of the edges appearing in p(t) is independent of the choice of the
edges appearing in q(t) in order to break cycles and obtain a spanning tree of
Γ. Hence the edges appearing in p(t) do not lie in any cycle in which are any of
the edges that appear in q(t).
Let
and
P = {ti such that ti appears in p(t)}
Q = {ti such that ti appears in q(t)} .
(43)
(44)
Since P ∩ Q = ∅, P ∪ Q are all the variables appearing in ΨΓ, and no cycle
in Γ contains both elements of P and Q, we have that, by Lemma 5.3, Γ is
separable.
References
[1] Aluffi, P., Marcolli, M., Feymann motives of banana graphs, Comm. in
Number Theory and Physics (2009) 1-57.
[2] S. Bloch, Motives associated to graphs, Japan J. Math., Vol.2 (2007) 165196.
[3] Bondy, A., Murty, U.S.R., Graph Theory, Springer, (2008).
[4] Sahasrabudhe, N., Grothendieck Ring of Varieties, Master Thesis, AL-
GANT Erasmus Mundus, Bordeaux, 2008.
9
|
0712.3192 | 4 | 0712 | 2010-01-17T23:31:46 | Generalized theta linear series on moduli spaces of vector bundles on curves | [
"math.AG"
] | This article is based on lecture notes prepared for the August 2006 Cologne Summer School. The first part contains background material and references for beginners. The second (and main) part is a survey of the current status in the theory of pluri-theta linear series and generalized theta divisors on moduli spaces of vector bundles on curves. It emphasizes relatively new techniques employed in the analysis of linear series on these moduli spaces, namely the use of moduli spaces of stable maps for understanding Quot schemes, and the Fourier-Mukai functor in the study of coherent sheaves on abelian varieties. In addition, it briefly describes recent important developments, most significant of which is the proof of the Strange Duality conjecture due to Belkale and Marian-Oprea. | math.AG | math |
GENERALIZED THETA LINEAR SERIES ON MODULI SPACES OF VECTOR
BUNDLES ON CURVES
MIHNEA POPA
CONTENTS
Introduction
1.
2. Semistable bundles
2.1. Arbitrary vector bundles
2.2. Semistable vector bundles
2.3. Example: Lazarsfeld's bundles
2.4. Example: Raynaud's bundles
2.5. The moduli space
3. Generalized theta divisors
4. Quot schemes and stable maps
5. Verlinde formula and Strange Duality
5.1. Verlinde formula
5.2. Strange Duality
6. Base points
6.1. Abstract criteria
6.2. Concrete constructions
6.3. Other determinants or levels
7. Effective results on generalized theta linear series
7.1. The theta map
7.2. Basepoint-freeness
7.3. Very ampleness
7.4. Verlinde bundles and bounds for UX (r, d)
7.5. Conjectures
References
1
2
2
4
6
8
9
11
14
15
15
17
19
19
20
22
23
23
24
26
27
30
31
1. INTRODUCTION
This article is based on lecture notes prepared for the August 2006 Cologne Summer
School. The notes have expanded in the meanwhile into a survey whose main focus is the
study of linear series on moduli spaces of vector bundles on curves.
The paper is essentially divided into two parts. The first, smaller one, consists of §2 and
§3, and is almost entirely devoted to background material, reflecting precisely what I was
The author was partially supported by the NSF grant DMS-0500985, by an AMS Centennial Fellowship, and
by a Sloan Fellowship, at various stages in the preparation of this work.
1
2
Mihnea Popa
able to cover during the first couple of introductory lectures at the school. There are a few
short proofs or hints, some exercises, while for the fundamental results I have to refer to
the standard references. This part is intended as a warm-up for the rest of the paper, and
especially as an introduction to the literature for beginners in the field. The experts are
advised to skip to §4 (with perhaps the exception of §2.3, 2.4).
The second part consists of §4-§7, and is a survey of the current status in the theory of
linear series and generalized theta divisors on these moduli spaces, including the connec-
tion with Quot schemes. Beauville's survey [Be2] has been a great source of inspiration
for researchers in this field (and in fact the main one for myself). A number of problems
proposed there have been however (at least partially) solved in recent years, and new con-
jectures have emerged. An update is provided in [Be5], where the emphasis is specifically
on the theta map. Here my goal is to complement this by emphasizing effective results on
pluri-theta linear series, and proposing some questions in this direction.
Concretely, I would like to stress relatively new techniques employed in the analysis
of linear series on moduli spaces of vector bundles, namely the use of moduli spaces of
stable maps for understanding Quot schemes, and of the Fourier-Mukai functor in the study
of coherent sheaves on Jacobians coming from generalized theta divisors.
In addition,
I will briefly describe recent important developments, namely the proof of the Strange
Duality conjecture by Belkale and Marian-Oprea, and the algebro-geometric derivation of
the Verlinde formula via intersection theory on Quot schemes, due to Marian-Oprea.
There is certainly recent and not so recent literature that I have not covered in this survey,
for which I apologize. This is mainly due to the fact that in goes in directions different from
the main thrust here, but sometimes also to my own lack of sufficient familiarity with the
respective results. For those so inclined, much of the material can also be phrased in the
language of stacks, with little or no difference in the proofs of the results in §3-7.
Acknowledgements. I would like to warmly thank the organizers of the Cologne Sum-
mer School, Thomas Eckl and Stefan Kebekus, for an extraordinarily well-organized and
successful school, which I consider a model for such events. I am also grateful to all the
students who took part for their enthusiasm and their helpful comments on the material.
Finally, I thank Arnaud Beauville, Prakash Belkale, Alina Marian and Drago¸s Oprea for
very useful comments and corrections.
2. SEMISTABLE BUNDLES
Most of the foundational material in this section can be found in detail in the books
of Le Potier [LP2] and Seshadri [Se], especially the construction of moduli spaces, which
is only alluded to here. I have only included sketches of simpler arguments, and some
exercises, in order to give the very beginner an idea of the subject. However, an explicit
description of two special classes of vector bundles that might be of interest to the more
advanced is given in §2.3 and §2.4.
2.1. Arbitrary vector bundles. Let X be a smooth projective curve of genus g over an
algebraically closed field k. I will identify freely vector bundles with locally free sheaves.
Generalized theta linear series on moduli spaces of vector bundles on curves
3
Definition 2.1. Let E be a vector bundle on X, of rank r. The determinant of E is the
line bundle det E := ∧rE. The degree of E is the degree e of det E.1 The slope of E is
µ(E) = e
r ∈ Q.
The Riemann-Roch formula for vector bundles on curves says:
χ(E) = h0(X, E) − h1(X, E) = e + r(1 − g).
An important example is the following: χ(E) = 0 ⇐⇒ µ(E) = g − 1.
Exercise 2.2. Let E be a vector bundle of rank r on the curve X. Then, for each k, the
degree of the quotient bundles of E of rank k is bounded from below.
From the moduli point of view, the initial idea would be to construct an algebraic va-
riety (or scheme) parametrizing the isomorphism classes of all vector bundles with fixed
invariants, i.e. rank r and degree e. Note that fixing these invariants is the same as fixing
the Hilbert polynomial of E.
Definition 2.3. Let B be a set of isomorphism classes of vector bundles. We say that B is
bounded if there exists a scheme of finite type S over k and a vector bundle F on S × X
such that all the elements of B are represented by some Fs := F{s}×X with s ∈ S.
We find easily that the initial idea above is too naive.
Lemma 2.4. The set of isomorphism classes of vector bundles of rank r and degree e on
X is not bounded.
Proof. Assuming that the family is bounded, use the notation in Definition 2.3. As F is
flat over S, by the semicontinuity theorem we get that there are only a finite number of
possible hiFs for i = 0, 1. Fix now a point x ∈ X and define for each k ∈ N the vector
bundle
Ek := OX (−kx) ⊕ OX ((k + e)x) ⊕ O⊕r−2
X
.
They all clearly have rank r and degree e. On the other hand, when k → ∞ we see that
h0Ek and h1Ek also go to ∞, which gives a contradiction.
(cid:3)
There exists however a well-known bounded moduli problem in this context, which
produces the Quot scheme. Let E be a vector bundle of rank r and degree e on X, and fix
integers 0 ≤ k ≤ r and d. We would like to parametrize all the quotients
with Q a coherent sheaf of rank k and degree d.2 We consider the Quot functor
E −→ Q −→ 0
QuotE
k,d
: Algebraic varieties/k → Sets
associating to each S the set of coherent quotients of ES := p∗
X E which are flat over S
and have rank k and degree d over each s ∈ S. This is a contravariant functor associating
f
to T
→ S the map taking a quotient ES → Q to the quotient ET = (f × id)∗ES →
(f × id)∗Q.
1This is the same as the first Chern class c1(E).
2Recall that the rank of an arbitrary coherent sheaf is its rank at a general point, while the degree is its first
Chern class.
4
Mihnea Popa
Theorem 2.5 (Grothendieck, cf. [LP2] §4). There exists a projective scheme Quotk,d(E)
of finite type over k, which represents the functor QuotE
k,d
.
This means the following: there exists a "universal quotient" EQuotk,d(E) → Q on
Quotk,d(E) × X, which induces for each variety S an isomorphism
Hom(S, Quotk,d(E)) ∼= QuotE
k,d
(S)
given by
(S
f
→ Quotk,d(E)) → (ES → (f × id)∗Q).
The terminology is: the Quot functor (scheme) is a fine moduli functor (space). I will
discuss more things about Quot schemes later -- for now let's just note the following basic
fact, which is a standard consequence of formal smoothness.
Proposition 2.6 ([LP2] §8.2). Let E be a vector bundle of rank r and degree e, and
q : [0 → G → E → F → 0]
a point in Quotk,d(E). Then:
(1) There is a natural isomorphism TqQuotk,d(E) ∼= Hom(G, F )(∼= H 0(G∨ ⊗ F )).
(2) If Ext1(G, F )(∼= H 1(G∨ ⊗ F )) = 0, then Quotk,d(E) is smooth at q.
(3) We have
h0(G∨ ⊗ F ) ≥ dimqQuotk,d(E) ≥ h0(G∨ ⊗ F ) − h1(G∨ ⊗ F ).
The last quantity is χ(G∨ ⊗ F ) = rd − ke − k(r − k)(g − 1) (by Riemann-Roch).
2.2. Semistable vector bundles. To remedy the problem explained in the previous sub-
section, one introduces the following notion.
Definition 2.7. Let E be a vector bundle on X of rank r and degree e.
It is called
semistable (respectively stable) if for any subbundle 0 6= F ֒→ E, we have µ(F ) ≤ µ(E)
(respectively µ(F ) < µ(E)). It can be easily checked that in the definition we can replace
subbundles with arbitrary coherent subsheaves.
Exercise 2.8. Let E and F be vector bundles such that χ(E ⊗ F ) = 0. If H 0(E ⊗ F ) = 0
(or equivalently, by Riemann-Roch, H 1(E ⊗ F ) = 0), then E and F are semistable.
Exercise 2.9. Let F be a stable bundle on the curve X. For any exact sequence
0 −→ E −→ F −→ G −→ 0
we have Hom(G, E) = 0.
Here are some basic properties.
Proposition 2.10. If E and F are stable vector bundles and µ(E) = µ(F ), then every
non-zero homomorphism φ : E → F is an isomorphism. In particular Hom(E, E) ∼= k
(i.e. E is simple).
Generalized theta linear series on moduli spaces of vector bundles on curves
5
Proof. Say G = Im(φ). Then by definition we must have µ(E) ≤ µ(G) ≤ µ(F ) and
wherever we have equality the bundles themselves must be equal. Since µ(E) = µ(F ),
we have equality everywhere, which implies easily that φ must be an isomorphism. Now
if φ ∈ Hom(E, E), by the above we see that k[φ] is an finite field extension of k. Since
this is algebraically closed, we deduce that φ = λ · Id, with λ ∈ k∗.
(cid:3)
Exercise 2.11. Fix a slope µ ∈ Q, and let SS(µ) be the category of semistable bundles of
slope µ. Based on Proposition 2.10, show that SS(µ) is an abelian category.
Definition 2.12. Let E ∈ SS(µ). A Jordan-Hölder filtration of E is filtration
0 = E0 ⊂ E1 ⊂ . . . ⊂ Ep = E
such that each quotient Ei+1/Ei is stable of slope µ.
Proposition 2.13. Jordan-Hölder filtrations exist. Any two have the same length and, upon
reordering, isomorphic stable factors.
Proof. (Sketch) Since the rank decreases, there is a G ⊂ E stable of slope µ. This implies
that E/G is semistable of slope µ and we repeat the process with E/G instead of E. The
rest is a well-known general algebra argument.
(cid:3)
Definition 2.14. (1) For any Jordan-Hölder filtration E• of E, we define
gr(E) := gr(E•) =Mi
Ei+1/Ei.
This is called the graded object associated to E (well-defined by the above).
(2) A vector bundle E is called polystable if it is a direct sum of stable bundles of the same
slope. (So for E semistable, gr(E) is polystable.)
(3) Two bundles E, F ∈ SS(µ) are called S-equivalent if gr(E) ∼= gr(F ).
Sometimes we can reduce the study of arbitrary bundles to that of semistable ones via
the following:
Exercise 2.15 (Harder-Narasimhan filtration). Let E be a vector bundle on X. Then there
exists an increasing filtration
such that
0 = E0 ⊂ E1 ⊂ . . . ⊂ Ep = E
(1) Each quotient Ei+1/Ei is semistable.
(2) We have µ(Ei/Ei−1) > µ(Ei+1/Ei) for all i.
The filtration is unique; it is called the Harder-Narasimhan filtration of E.
Example 2.16. (1) All line bundles are stable. Any extension of vector bundles in SS(µ)
is also in SS(µ).
(2) If (r, e) = 1, then stable is equivalent to semistable.
(3) If X = P1, by Grothendieck's theorem we know that every vector bundle splits as
E ∼= O(a1) ⊕ . . . ⊕ O(ar), so it is semistable iff all ai are equal.
6
Mihnea Popa
(4) We will encounter some very interesting examples below. Until then, here is the first
type of example which requires a tiny argument. Say L1 and L2 are line bundles on X,
with deg L1 = d and deg L2 = d + 1. Consider extensions of the form
0 −→ L1 −→ E −→ L2 −→ 0.
These are parametrized by Ext1(L2, L1) ∼= H 1(X, L1 ⊗ L−1
2 ). By Riemann-Roch this is
isomorphic to kg−2, so as soon as g ≥ 3 we can choose the extension to be non-split. For
such a choice E is stable: first note that µ(E) = d + 1/2. Consider any line subbundle M
of E. If deg M ≤ d everything is fine. If not, the induced map M → L2 must be non-zero
(otherwise M would factor through L1, of too low degree). This immediately implies that
it must be an isomorphism, which is a contradiction since the extension is non-split.
For later reference, let me also mention the following important result. An elementary
proof based on Gieseker's ideas can be found in [Laz2] §6.4.
Theorem 2.17. Assume that char(k) = 0. If E and F are semistable bundles, then E ⊗ F
is also semistable.3 In particular, for any k, SkE and ∧kE are also semistable.
2.3. Example: Lazarsfeld's bundles. Here are the more interesting examples of
semistable bundles promised above.
In this subsection, following [Laz1], I describe a
construction considered by Lazarsfeld in the study of syzygies of curves. In the next I will
describe a different construction due to Raynaud.
Consider a line bundle L on X of degree d ≥ 2g + 1. Denote by ML the kernel of the
evaluation map:
0 −→ ML −→ H 0(L) ⊗ OX
ev
−→ L −→ 0
and let QL = M ∨
The main property of QL is the following:
L . Note that rk QL = h0L − 1 = d − g and deg L = d, so µ(QL) = d
d−g .
Proposition 2.18. If x1, . . . , xd are the points of a generic hyperplane section of X ⊂
P(H 0(L)), then QL sits in an extension:
0 −→
d−g−1Mi=1
OX (xi) −→ QL −→ OX (xd−g + . . . + xd) −→ 0.
Proof. (1) Look first at a general situation: assume that x1, . . . , xk are distinct points on
X, with D = x1 + . . . + xk, such that:
(1) L(−D) is globally generated.
(2) h0L(−D) = h0L − k.
Claim: In this case we have an exact sequence
0 −→ ML(−D) −→ ML −→
kMi=1
OX (−xi) −→ 0.
3It is also true that if E and F are actually stable, then E ⊗ F is polystable.
Generalized theta linear series on moduli spaces of vector bundles on curves
7
Proof. By Riemann-Roch and (1) we have h1L(−D) = h1L. This implies that after
passing to cohomology, the exact sequence
0 −→ L(−D) −→ L −→ LD −→ 0
stays exact. Note also that the evaluation map for LD can be written as
(cid:0)H 0LD ⊗ OX → LD(cid:1) =(cid:0) kMi=1
(OX → Oxi)(cid:1).
Using all of these facts, (2) and the Snake Lemma, we obtain a diagram whose top row
gives precisely our Claim.
0
0
0
0
/ ML(−D)
0
ML
0
⊕k
i=1OX (−xi)
/ H 0L(−D) ⊗ OX
H 0L ⊗ OX
H 0LD
/ L(−D)
0
L
0
LD
0
0
0
0
(cid:3)
(2) Note now that if in the situation above we also have h0L(−D) = 2, then the exact
sequence takes the form
0 −→ OX (x1 + . . . + xk) ⊗ L−1 −→ ML −→
kMi=1
OX (−xi) −→ 0.
This is clear, since in this case by definition rk ML(−D) = 1 and det ML(−D) = L−1(D).
(3) Say now that X is embedded in Pn by a line bundle L, and Λ := Span(cid:0)x1, . . . , xk(cid:1) ⊂
Pn. Then we have the following general
Exercise 2.19. (a) h0L(−D) = h0L − k ⇐⇒ dim Λ = k − 1.
(b) L(−D) is globally generated ⇐⇒ Λ ∩ X = {x1, . . . , xk} and Λ does not contain the
tangent line to X at xi for all i.
(4) Now consider the situation in the Proposition, when X ⊂ P(H 0L) and x1, . . . , xd are
the points of a general hyperplane section of X. This implies that the points are in linear
general position, which immediately gives that the conditions in Exercise 2.19 are satisfied.
By the previous points, we are done.
(cid:3)
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
8
Mihnea Popa
Proposition 2.18 implies the stability of QL. The proof below is due to Ein-Lazarsfeld
[EL1].
Proposition 2.20. Under the assumptions above QL is a stable bundle.
Proof. Let's see that the dual ML is stable. One can actually prove a bit more: ML is
cohomologically stable, i.e. for any line bundle A of degree a and any t < rkML = d − g:
(1)
H 0(
t^ ML ⊗ A−1) = 0 if a ≥ t · µ(ML) = −
td
d − g
.
This implies the stability of ML: indeed, if F ֒→ ML is a subbundle of degree a and rank
t, then we have an inclusion A := Vt F ֒→ Vt ML, which implies that H 0(Vt ML ⊗
A−1) 6= 0. By cohomological stability we must have µ(F ) = a
stable.
t < µ(ML), so ML is
To prove (1), take exterior powers in the dual of the sequence in Proposition 2.18 to
obtain
0 → OX (−xd−g−. . .−xd)⊗
t−1^ (
d−g−1Mi=1
OX (−xi)) →
t^ ML →
d−g−1Mi=1
t^(
OX (−xi)) → 0.
In other words we have an exact sequence
0 →
M1≤i1<...<it−1≤d−g−1
OX (−xi1 − . . . − xit−1 − xd−g . . . − xd)) →
t^ ML
→
M1≤j1<...<jt≤d−g−1
OX (−xj1 − . . . − xjt )) → 0.
We tensor this sequence by A−1. It can be checked easily that on both extremes H 0 is
zero, as the points xi are general. This implies what we want.
(cid:3)
Corollary 2.21. If char(k) = 0, then for all p the bundleVp QL is semistable.
2.4. Example: Raynaud's bundles. (cf. [Ra]) Let X ֒→ J(X) be an Abel-Jacobi em-
bedding. Denote A = J(X). Then A has a principal polarization Θ, which induces an
isomorphism A ∼= bA = Pic0(A). Denote by P a Poincaré bundle on A × bA. For any
m ≥ 1, we consider what is called the Fourier-Mukai transform of O bA(−mΘ), namely:
F := \O bA(−mΘ) := RgpA∗(p∗
bAO(−mΘ) ⊗ P).
By base change, this is a vector bundle with fiber over x ∈ A isomorphic to
H g(bA, O bA(−mΘ) ⊗ P{x}× bA) ∼= H 0(J(X), OJ(X)(mΘ) ⊗ Px)∨,
where Px is the line bundle in Pic0(J(X))) corresponding to x ∈ J(X). (Note that as x
varies with J(X), Px varies with Pic0(J(X)).) Hence F is a vector bundle of rank mg.
Define the vector bundle E := FX on X.
The claim is that this is a semistable bundle. Indeed, consider the multiplication by m
map φm : A → A. By a result of Mukai, [Mu2] Proposition 3.11, we have that
φ∗
mF ∼= H 0O bA(mΘ) ⊗ O bA(mΘ) ∼=Mmg
O bA(mΘ).
Generalized theta linear series on moduli spaces of vector bundles on curves
9
We consider the étale base change ψ : Y → X, where Y = φ−1
m (X). The decomposition
of F via pull-back by φm implies that ψ∗E is semistable on Y . Applying the well-known
Lemma below, we deduce that E is semistable.
Lemma 2.22. (cf. [Laz2] Lemma 6.4.12) Let f : Y → X be a finite morphism of smooth
projective curves, and E a vector bundle on X. Then E is semistable if and only if f ∗E is
semistable.
Let's also compute the slope of E. Note that deg ψ∗E = deg φm ·deg E = m2g ·deg E.
This gives
deg E =
mg · m · (θ · [Y ])
m2g
=
θ · [Y ]
mg−1 .
But since Y = φ−1
Putting everything together, we finally obtain
m (X), φ∗
mθ ≡ m2 ·θ and θ·[X] = g, we have that m2 ·(θ·[Y ]) = g ·m2g.
deg E = g · mg−1, i.e. µ(E) =
g
m
.
Remark 2.23. Schneider [Sch2] uses a slightly more refined study of Raynaud's bundles
based on theta-group actions in order to show that they are actually stable.
Remark 2.24. A generalization of Raynaud's examples, by means of semi-homogeneous
vector bundles on the Jacobian of X, is presented in Remark 7.18 (2).
Remark 2.25. I will only mention in passing one more interesting idea, which has to do
with moduli of curves: certain types of stable bundles can exist only on special curves, just
like in the usual Brill-Noether theory for line bundles. One can look for vector bundles
with "many" sections, i.e. wonder whether for a given k there exist semistable bundles E
on X of rank r and degree d (or fixed determinant L), which have k independent sections.
For instance, if g(X) = 10, one can see that the condition that there exist a semistable
bundle of rank 2 and determinant ωX with at least 7 sections is codimension 1 in M10, i.e.
such bundles exist only on curves filling up a divisor in M10. The closure of this locus in
M10 is a very interesting divisor, the first one shown to be of slope smaller than expected
(cf. [FP]). As examples of stable bundles though, the vector bundles here are not quite
new: they are roughly speaking of the same kind as the Lazarsfeld examples above.
2.5. The moduli space. Back to the boundedness problem: we want to see that semistable
bundles do the job. First a technical point, extending a well-known fact for line bundles.
Exercise 2.26. Let E be a semistable bundle on X.
(a) If µ(E) > 2g − 2, then h1E = 0.
(b) If µ(E) > 2g − 1, then E is globally generated.
Proposition 2.27. The set S(r, d) of isomorphism classes of semistable bundles of rank r
and degree d is bounded.
Proof. Fix OX (1) a polarization on the curve. By Exercise 2.26, there exists a fixed m ≫
0 such that for all F in S(r, d) we have h1F (m) = 0 and F (m) is globally generated. Let
q := h0F (m) = χ(F (m)), which is constant by Riemann-Roch. The global generation of
F (m) means that we have a quotient
O⊕q
X (−m)
β
−→ F −→ 0.
10
Mihnea Popa
These all belong to the Quot scheme Quotr,d(O⊕q
X (−m)), which is a bounded family. (cid:3)
The quotient β can be realized in many ways: fix a vector space V ∼= kq, and choose
X (−m)) we
an isomorphism V ∼= H 0F (m). On Quotr,d(V ⊗ OX (−m)) ∼= Quotr,d(O⊕q
have a natural GL(V )-action, namely each g ∈ GL(V ) induces a diagram
V ⊗ OX (−m)
Q
9sssssssssss
g⊗id
V ⊗ OX (−m)
The scalar matrices act trivially on these quotients, so in fact we have a P GL(V )-action.
Proposition 2.28. Let Ω ⊂ Quotr,d(V ⊗ OX (−m)) be the set of quotients Q such that Q
is semistable and V ∼= H 0Q(m). Then Ω is invariant under the P GL(V )-action, and we
have a bijection
Ω/P GL(V ) −→ S(r, d).
Proof. The set Ω is clearly invariant, and the points in the same orbit give isomorphic
quotient bundles, so we have a natural map Ω/P GL(V ) −→ S(r, d). Since m ≫ 0, by
global generation the map is surjective. Suppose now that we have two different quotients
inducing an isomorphism φ:
V ⊗ OX (−m)
V ⊗ OX (−m)
/ Q
φ ∼=
/ Q
This induces an isomorphism H 0Q(m)
−→ H 0Q(m), which corresponds to an ele-
ment g ∈ GL(V ). This is uniquely determined up to scalars, so we can in fact consider it
in P GL(V ).
(cid:3)
H 0 φ(m)
Although this was not one of the topics of the lectures, the main point of Geometric
Invariant Theory (GIT) -- appropriately for this volume, one of D. Mumford's most cele-
brated achievements -- is in this context essentially to show that in fact this quotient has
the structure of a projective algebraic variety.4 The GIT machinery constructs the space
UX(r, d) -- an algebraic variety replacement of Sr,d -- the moduli space of S-equivalence
classes of semistable vector bundles of rank r and degree d on X. For the well-known
construction, that can be adapted to arbitrary characteristic without difficulty, cf. [LP2] §7
or [Se] Ch.I. We denote by U s
X(r, d) the open subset corresponding to isomorphism classes
of stable bundles.
We consider also a variant of UX(r, d) when the determinant of the vector bundles is
fixed. More precisely, for any L ∈ Picd(X), we denote by SUX (r, L) the moduli space
of (S-equivalence classes of) semistable bundles of rank r and fixed determinant L. These
are the fibers of the natural determinant map
det : UX (r, d) −→ Picd(X).
4This is literally true if we consider S-equivalence classes of semistable bundles (cf. Definition 2.14) instead
of isomorphism classes.
/
/
9
/
/
Generalized theta linear series on moduli spaces of vector bundles on curves
11
These spaces have the following basic properties, essentially all derived from the GIT
construction (cf. e.g. [Se] Ch.I and [DN]):
(1) UX (r, d) and SUX (r, L) are projective varieties (i.e irreducible), of dimension r2(g −
1) + 1 and (r2 − 1)(g − 1) respectively.
(2) UX (r, d) and SUX (r, L) are in general only coarse moduli spaces (i.e.
there is no
universal family). In fact one can show that they are fine moduli spaces if and only if
(r, d) = 1.
(3) UX (r, d) and SUX (r, L) are normal, Gorenstein, with rational singularities.
(4) Sing(UX (r, d)) = UX (r, d) − U s
UX(r, d) is smooth. Same for SUX(r, L).
X(r, d), unless g = 2, r = 2 and d = even, when
(5) If E is stable,
TESUX (r, L) ∼= H 1(X, ad(E)).
phisms of E.)
then TEUX (r, d) ∼= H 1(X, E∨ ⊗ E) ∼= Ext1(E, E) and
(Recall that ad(E) is the sheaf of trace 0 endomor-
Exercise 2.29. Let r > 0 and d be two integers, h := (r, d) and r0 := r/h, d0 := d/h.
The dimension of the singular locus Sing UX (r, d) is equal to r2
2 (g − 1) + 2 if h is even,
and r2+r2
(g − 1) + 2 if h is odd.
0
2
Exercise 2.30 (Moduli of vector bundles on elliptic curves). Let X be an elliptic curve.
Assume that (r, d) = 1 and d > 0. Then the determinant map det : UX (r, d) → Picd(X)
is an isomorphism. (Cf. [LP2], Exercise 8.7, for a break-down of this exercise. The case
when (r, d) > 1 is more involved. It can be shown that there are no stable bundles of rank
r and degree d, and that UX (r, d) is isomorphic to the symmetric product ShX, where
h = (r, d); cf. [At].)
3. GENERALIZED THETA DIVISORS
Consider first the following well-known situation: on Picd(X) we have, for each L ∈
Picg−1−d(X), a theta divisor
ΘL := {M h0(M ⊗ L) 6= 0},
which is a "translate" of the principal polarization Θ on the Jacobian J(X) ∼= Pic0(X) (or
of Wg−1 = {N h0N 6= 0} ⊂ Picg−1(X)). Note that the numerical choice is such that
χ(M ⊗ L) = 0.
Now fix E ∈ UX (r, d).5 When can we have a vector bundle F such that χ(E ⊗F ) = 0?
By Riemann-Roch we need µ(E ⊗ F ) = g − 1, in other words
µ(F ) = g − 1 − µ(E).
Using the notation h = (r, d), r0 = r/h and d0 = d/h, we see that the only possibilities
are rk F = kr0 and deg F = k(r0(g − 1) − d0), with k ≥ 1. Fix such an F .
5I will always use somewhat abusively vector bundle notation instead of S-equivalence class notation for
simplicity. For anything we are interested in, it can be checked easily using Jordan-Hölder filtrations that the
statement is independent of the choice in the S-equivalence class.
12
Mihnea Popa
Claim: If there exists E ∈ UX (r, d) such that H 0(E ⊗ F ) = 0, then
ΘF := {E h0(E ⊗ F ) 6= 0} ⊂ UX (r, d)
is a divisor with a natural scheme structure (a generalized theta divisor). The same is true
on SUX (r, L).
Proof. I will sketch here only the case (r, d) = 1, when there exists a universal family on
X × UX (r, d).6 It is a typical example of a determinantal construction: let E be a universal
bundle on X × UX(r, d) and D an effective divisor on X with deg D ≫ 0. We can
consider the following natural sequence obtained by pushing forward to UX (r, d):
0 → pU ∗(E ⊗ p∗
X F ) → pU ∗(E ⊗ p∗
X F (D)) → pU ∗((E ⊗ p∗
X F (D))D×UX (r,d)) →
→ R1pU ∗(E ⊗ p∗
X F ) → 0,
Note that the 0 on the right is obtained by Base Change, since for any E ∈ UX (r, d) we
have that h1(E ⊗ F (D)) = 0, as D has sufficiently large degree and the family of E's is
bounded. Let's redenote this sequence
0 → K → G α→ H → C → 0.
In fact we have K = 0 (exercise: why?). In any case, by Base Change and Riemann-Roch,
G and H are vector bundles on UX (r, d) of the same rank r · rk(F ) · deg(D). On the locus
where Base Change applies, fiberwise we have
H 0(E ⊗ F (D)) → H 0(E ⊗ F (D)D) → H 1(E ⊗ F ).
We see immediately that the degeneracy locus of α is set-theoretically precisely ΘF . This
means that ΘF has a determinantal scheme structure and since rk G = rk H we have that
codim ΘF ≤ 1. Since there exists E such that h0(E ⊗ F ) = 0, i.e E 6∈ ΘF , we must then
have codim ΘF = 1.
(cid:3)
Note that by Exercise 2.8, a vector bundle F as in the Claim has to be semistable. The
requirement above is indeed satisfied for F general in its corresponding moduli space of
semistable bundles, so we always have enough generalized theta divisors (cf. e.g. [DN]
0.2). One proof is based on counting techniques similar to those explained below in §7.
Note however that, by semicontinuity, it is obvious for example on the moduli spaces that
contain direct sums of line bundles, for instance UX (k, k(g − 1)).
One of the most important facts that has been proved about the moduli spaces of vector
bundles on curves, again using the GIT description, is the following:
Theorem 3.1. (Drezet-Narasimhan [DN]) (1) UX (r, d) and SUX (r, L) are locally facto-
rial.
(2) For any F ∈ UX(kr0, k(r0(g − 1) − d0)) such that ΘF is a divisor, the line bundle
O(ΘF ) on SUX (r, L) does not depend on the choice of F . The Picard group of SUX(r, L)
is isomorphic to Z, generated by an ample line bundle L (called the determinant line
bundle), and ΘF ∈ Lk.
6The general case follows by doing essentially the same thing on a Quot scheme and using GIT, or on an étale
cover of UX (r, d) (cf. [DN]).
Generalized theta linear series on moduli spaces of vector bundles on curves
13
(3) The inclusions Pic(Picd(X)) ⊂ Pic(UX (r, d)) (given by the determinant morphism
det : UX (r, d) → Picd(X)) and Z · O(ΘF ) ⊂ Pic(UX (r, d)), with k = 1, induce an
isomorphism
Pic(UX (r, d)) ∼= Pic(Picd(X)) ⊕ Z.
We have the following transformation formula: if F, F ′ ∈ UX (kr0, k(r0(g − 1) − d0)),
then
O(ΘF ) ∼= O(ΘF ′ ) ⊗ det∗(det(F ) ⊗ det(F ′)−1).
(4) ωSUX (r,L)
There is a similar formula for UX (r, d).
∼= L−2h, where h = (r, d) (in particular, SUX (r, L) are Fano varieties).
Exercise 3.2. For L ∈ Picd(X), consider the tensor product map
τ : SUX (r, L) × Pic0(X) −→ UX (r, d).
(1) Show that τ is étale Galois, with Galois group X[r] ⊂ Pic0(X), the group of r-torsion
points in the Jacobian of X.
(2) For any vector bundle F ∈ UX (kr0, k(r0(g − 1) − d0)) giving a theta divisor ΘF on
UX(r, d), show that
τ ∗OU (ΘF ) ∼= Lk ⊠ OPic(krr0ΘN ),
where L is the determinant line bundle on SUX (r, L) and N ∈ Picg−1(X).
The very existence of generalized theta divisors has as a consequence a useful criterion
for basepoint-freeness, point separation and tangent vector separation. I state it for sim-
plicity only in degree 0, but there are analogous statements for any degree. The first two
parts follow immediately from the definition of ΘF .
Corollary 3.3. (1) Given E ∈ SUX(r), if there exists F ∈ UX (k, k(g − 1)) such that
H 0(E ⊗ F ) = 0, then Lk is free at E.
(2) Given E1, E2 ∈ SUX (r), if there exists F ∈ UX (k, k(g − 1)) such that H 0(E1 ⊗ F ) =
0 and H 0(E2 ⊗ F ) 6= 0, then Lk separates E1 and E2.
(3) Consider E ∈ SU s
X(r) and v ∈ TESUX (r), corresponding to an extension
0 −→ E −→ E −→ E −→ 0.
If there exists F ∈ UX(k, k(g − 1)) such that h0(E ⊗ F ) = 1 and the induced element in
Hom(F ∨, E) does not lift to an element in Hom(F ∨, E) via the extension map, then Lk
separates v.
Exercise 3.4. Prove part (3) of Corollary 3.3.
Remark 3.5. Among the generalized theta divisors described in this section, an impor-
tant class is provided by pluri-theta divisors on Jacobians associated to higher rank vector
bundles. This means, say for E in UX (r, r(g − 1)), loci of the form
ΘE = {L ∈ Pic0(X) H 0(E ⊗ L) = 0} ⊂ Pic0(X).
For a variety of reasons, it is interesting to detect when a bundle E "has" such a theta
divisor, i.e. when ΘE is indeed a proper subset. Besides the connection with linear series
on the moduli space described in these notes, some special such theta divisors appear for
example in [FMP] in connection with the Minimal Resolution Conjecture for points on
curves. Cf. also [Be3] for related topics.
14
Mihnea Popa
4. QUOT SCHEMES AND STABLE MAPS
The Quot scheme is a key tool in the study of moduli spaces, beyond its obvious role
coming from the GIT construction. For applications, one of the most important things is to
understand a good dimension bound. If X is a smooth projective curve, and E is a vector
bundle on X, denote by Quotk,d(E) the Quot scheme parametrizing coherent quotients of
E of rank k and degree d. Set
dk = dk(E) := min
rk F =k
{deg F F a quotient of E} ,
i.e. the minimal degree of a quotient bundle of rank k (cf. Exercise 2.2).
Theorem 4.1 ([PR]). For an arbitrary vector bundle E of rank r, the following holds:
dim Quotk,d(E) ≤ k(r − k) + (d − dk)r, f or all d ≥ dk.
This result opens the door towards obtaining effective bounds for basepoint-freeness
and very ampleness on the moduli spaces of vector bundles, as explained in §7, and is
useful for a variety of counting problems related to families of vector bundles.
Remark 4.2. (1) In general the invariant dk is quite mysterious. In case E is semistable
however, there are obvious lower bounds given by the semistability condition: for example
if E ∈ SUX(r), then dk ≥ 0.
(2) Lange [La] showed that if E ∈ UX (r, e) is general, then dk(E) is the smallest integer
making the expression dkr − ke − k(r − k)(g − 1) non-negative.
(3) By Proposition 2.6, if q = [E → Q → 0] is a quotient of rank r and degree d, we
always have
dimqQuotk,d(E) ≥ rd − ke − k(r − k)(g − 1).
Combining with the Theorem above, this gives
rdk − ke ≤ k(r − k)g,
which is an upper bound on dk due to Lange [La] and Mukai-Sakai [MS], extending an old
theorem of Nagata on the minimal self-intersection of a section of a ruled surface. Loosely
speaking, every vector bundle has quotients of every rank of sufficiently small degree.
I will explain briefly the approach to proving Theorem 4.1. The starting point is the
well-known identification provided by the following:
Exercise 4.3. Let E be a vector bundle of rank r and degree e on a smooth projective curve
X.
(1) Show that all the vector bundle quotients of E of rank k can be identified with sections
of the Grassmann bundle (of quotients) projection π : G(k, E) → X.
(2) Let E
corresponds to a section s : X → G(k, E). If Y = s(X), then show that
q
→ F → 0 be a vector bundle quotient of E of rank k. By the above this
deg F = d ⇐⇒ OG(1) · Y = rd − ke
where OG(1) on G(k, E) is the line bundle inducing the Plücker line bundle on the fibers.
Deduce that d determines and is determined by the cohomology class of Y .
Generalized theta linear series on moduli spaces of vector bundles on curves
15
It had already been noticed by Mukai-Sakai [MS] that the Rigidity Lemma applied to
sections as in the Exercise above provides the bound in the case d = dk. The general proce-
dure is an induction relying on the Bend-and-Break Lemma, which needs to be applied to a
close kin of Quotk,d(E), namely the moduli space of stable maps Mg(G(k, E), βd). Here
βd is the class of any section corresponding to a quotient of E of degree d -- this imposes
strong conditions on the points (C, f ) ∈ Mg(G(k, E), βd): there must be one component
C0 of C mapping isomorphically onto X, while all the other components must be rational,
forming trees hanging off the main component C0. The stability condition implies that
no such tree can be collapsed by f . When there are such extra rational components, i.e.
when the point is in the boundary of Mg(G(k, E), βd), the main component C0 gives a
section of G(k, E) → X corresponding to a quotient of E of degree strictly smaller than
d. Heuristically, on one hand such boundary loci have to be rather large because of Bend-
and-Break, while on the other hand by the observation above their general points are in the
image of glueing (along the marked points) maps of the form
Mg,1(G(k, E), βd−δ) ×G(k,E) M0,1(G(k, E), αδ) −→ Mg(G(k, E), βd).
Since d − δ is strictly smaller than d, the dimension of the image can be bounded by induc-
tion on the degree. In this argument, considering the compactification Mg(G(k, E), βd),
with "larger" boundary than Quotk,d(E), is crucial.
I conclude by mentioning a result which is not directly relevant to the sequel, but which
is perhaps the main application of Theorem 4.1 outside the realm of moduli spaces.
Theorem 4.4 ([PR]). For any vector bundle E on X, there is an integer dQ = dQ(E, k)
such that for all d ≥ dQ, Quotk,d(E) is irreducible. For any such d, Quotk,d(E) is
generically smooth, has dimension rd − ke − k(r − k)(g − 1), and its generic point
corresponds to a vector bundle quotient.
This had been proved before in the case E = Or
X in [BDW]. It is amusing to note that,
reversing the usual order, the result relies on the existence and properties of moduli spaces
of stable bundles. In the case when E is semistable, the integer dQ in the statement above
can be made effective (cf. [PR], end of §6). There are plenty of examples with small d
where the result fails in various ways -- cf. e.g. [Po2] §2 or [PR] §5 for this and other
examples of the behavior of Quot schemes on curves.
5. VERLINDE FORMULA AND STRANGE DUALITY
The main purpose of this section is to update the comprehensive presentation in [Be2]
with beautiful recent results of Belkale [Bel1], [Bel2] and Marian-Oprea [MO1], [MO2]
(cf. also [MO3]).
5.1. Verlinde formula. Theorem 3.1 says that the only line bundles on the moduli space
SUX(r, L) are the powers of the determinant line bundle L. The Verlinde formula tells
us the dimension sr,d,k of the space of global sections H 0(SUX (r, L), Lk), for all k ≥
1, where d = deg(L). For an extended discussion of the Verlinde formula and various
proofs, see [Be2]; I will mention two more recent intersection theoretic proofs below. I
state a numerical result only in the case when L = OX, using the notation SUX (r) :=
SUX(r, OX ) and sr,k := sr,0,k; there are analogous but technically more complicated
16
Mihnea Popa
results for any L. In this case, in a form due to Zagier, according to [Be1] §5 the formula
reads
(2)
sr,k = h0(SUX(r), Lk) =(cid:0)
r
r + k(cid:1)g
· XS∪T ={1,...,r+k}
Ys∈S
S=r,T =k
t∈T
(cid:12)(cid:12)2 · sin π
s − t
r + k(cid:12)(cid:12)g−1
.
Example 5.1. Note that s1,k = 1, while sr,1 = rg. This last number is the same as the
dimension of the space of classical theta functions of level r, i.e. h0(J(X), OJ (rΘ)). We
will see in a second that this is not a coincidence.
By Theorem 3.1(4) and Kodaira vanishing (which works on varieties with rational sin-
gularities by Grauert-Riemenschneider vanishing), for any L we have
H i(SUX (r, L), Lk) = 0, for all i > 0 and k > 0,
which implies that
h0(SUX (r, L), Lk) = χ(Lk) =
L(r2−1)(g−1)
(r2 − 1)(g − 1)!
· k(r2−1)(g−1) + l.o.t.
This is a polynomial in k, with integral output7 and the knowledge of various intersection
numbers on the moduli space appearing in the Riemann-Roch formula naturally leads to
the answer. This type of direct calculation proof was first completed by Jeffrey-Kirwan
[JK] in the case (r, d) = 1 (when the moduli space is smooth), using symplectic methods.
Recently they achieved the same in the general case, together with coauthors [JKKW],
using their previous methods in the framework of intersection homology.
From the algebro-geometric point of view, a surprisingly simple proof was recently pro-
vided by Marian-Oprea [MO1] in the smooth case. Hopefully the same type of proof -- with
the technical modifications due to the presence of singularities -- will eventually work also
in the non-coprime case. The point of their proof is to turn the computation into looking
at intersection numbers of geometrically defined classes on a Quot scheme parametrizing
quotients of a trivial vector bundle. More precisely, let Q = Quotr,d(Or(k+1)
) be the Quot
scheme of coherent quotients of rank r and degree d of the trivial bundle of rank r(k + 1)
on X, which can be endowed with a virtual fundamental cycle [Q]vir. On Q × X there is a
universal bundle E, and the Künneth decomposition of the Chern classes of its dual defines
the ai (and bj
i , fi) classes:
X
ci(E ∨) = ai ⊗ 1 +
2gXj=1
bj
i ⊗ δj + fi, i = 1, . . . , r,
where δi are generators of the first cohomology of X. It turns out that only some very
special intersection numbers on this Quot scheme are needed in order to obtain the Verlinde
formula. In fact the key formula proved in [MO1] is
(3)
h0(SUX (r, L), Lk) =
ak(d−r(g−1))+d
r
.
1
(k + 1)g ·Z[Q]vir
Now, at least when d is large enough, this intersection number has an enumerative meaning,
namely it counts the number of degree d maps to the Grassmannian G(r, r(k + 1)) with
7Neither of which seems to be obvious from the formula in the case L = OX .
Generalized theta linear series on moduli spaces of vector bundles on curves
17
incidences at k(d − r(g − 1)) + d points with sub-Grassmannians G(r, r(k + 1) − 1) in
general position.
What about UX (r, d)? For instance, note that we have a natural morphism obtained by
taking tensor product with line bundles:
τ : SUX (r) × Picg−1(X) ⊗−→ UX (r, r(g − 1)).
One can check by a slight variation of Exercise 3.2 that if we denote the canonical polar-
ization
Θ = Θcan := {E h0E 6= 0} ⊂ UX (r, r(g − 1)),
we have that
τ ∗OU (Θ) ∼= L ⊠ OPic(rΘ).
The Künneth formula gives then for any k ≥ 1 an isomorphism
H 0(τ ∗OU (kΘ)) ∼= H 0(SUX (r), Lk) ⊗ H 0(Picg−1(X), O(rΘ)).
Putting these facts together, we obtain that
h0(UX (r, r(g − 1), OU (kΘ)) = sr,k ·
kg
rg .
Corollary 5.2.
h0(UX (k, k(g − 1), OU (rΘ)) = sr,k = h0(SUX (r), Lk).
Proof. Stare at the Verlinde formula until you see that the expression sr,k·r−g is symmetric
in r and k.
(cid:3)
Corollary 5.3.
h0(UX (k, k(g − 1), OU (Θ)) = 1, for all k ≥ 1.
More generally, in [DT] and [Be1] §8 it is explained that a simple covering argument re-
duces the calculation of the dimension of spaces of generalized theta functions on UX (r, d)
to the Verlinde formula as well. Here, as before, ΘF is any basic theta divisor on UX (r, d)
as in Theorem 3.1(3), h = (r, d), and sr,d,k = h0(SUX(r, L), Lk) for any L ∈ Picd(X).
Proposition 5.4.
h0(UX (r, d), OU (kΘF )) = sr,d,k ·
kg
hg .
5.2. Strange Duality. Furthermore, recalling the notation r0 = r/h and d0 = d/h, one
defines a tensor product map:
τ : SUX (r, L) × UX(kr0, k(r0(g − 1) − d0)) ⊗−→ UX (krr0, krr0(g − 1)).
We pull back the unique section given by Corollary 5.3 to the product space. Hence up to
constants we have a naturally defined section in H 0(τ ∗OU (Θ)). Consider a stable bundle
G of rank r0 and degree d0 which has a theta divisor. It can be checked easily that this is a
basic theta divisor on UX (kr0, k(r0(g − 1) − d0)) If we impose the (harmless) assumption
that L ∼= (det G)⊗h, we have a simple formula for the pull-back line bundle:
Thus our section lives naturally in
τ ∗OU (Θ) ∼= Lk ⊠ OU (hΘG).
H 0(SUX (r, L), Lk) ⊗ H 0(UX (kr0, k(r0(g − 1) − d0)), OU (hΘG)),
18
Mihnea Popa
and so it induces a non-zero homomorphism
SD : H 0(SUX(r, L), Lk)∨ −→ H 0(UX (kr0, k(r0(g − 1) − d0), OU (hΘG)).
We saw that the two spaces have the same dimension. In fact much more is true, namely
what used to be called the Strange Duality Conjecture.
Theorem 5.5. SD is an isomorphism.
This is certainly one of the most exciting recent theorems to be proved in the context of
generalized theta functions. Belkale [Bel1] first proved it for general curves. Subsequently,
building on some of his ideas, and introducing several new ones as well, Marian and Oprea
[MO2] proved it for all curves. Finally, in [Bel2], Belkale complemented the picture by
showing the flatness of the global Strange Duality map over the moduli space of curves.
A more detailed discussion is given below. (Previous results include a proof for k = 1 by
Beauville-Narasimhan-Ramanan [BNR], and a proof for r = 2 by Abe [Ab].)
Remark 5.6. The Strange Duality has a beautiful geometric interpretation (which is also
the key to its proof): for any k ≥ 1, the linear series Lk on SUX (r, L) is spanned by the
generalized theta divisors ΘF , with F ∈ UX(kr0, k(r0(g − 1) − d0)). Here is a sketch of
this, following [Be1] §8. The duality is equivalent to having a commutative diagram
SUX (r, L)
P((H 0Lk)∨)
φLk
θk
(PPPPPPPPPPPP
∼= SD
P(H 0OU (hΘG))
where φLk and θk are in general only rational maps, the first one induced by the line bundle
Lk, and the second taking the form E → ΘE ∈ hΘG. Note that the divisor of the section
inducing the SD map is
D = {(E, F ) h0(E ⊗ F ) 6= 0} ⊂ SUX (r, L) × UX (kr0, k(r0(g − 1) − d0).
If HF ∈ P(H 0OU (hΘG)) is the hyperplane of divisors passing through F , then θ∗
kHF =
ΘF , so via this duality the generalized theta divisors ΘF correspond to the hyperplanes
HF , which obviously span the linear series P(H 0OU (hΘG)).
I will give a quick overview of the methods involved in the proof of the Strange Duality,
and for technical simplicity I stick to the case d = 0. Belkale's approach [Bel1] is to use
the geometric interpretation of the Strange Duality in the Remark above. Namely, his aim
is to construct m = sr,k vector bundles E1, . . . , Em with trivial determinant, and also m
vector bundles F1, . . . , Fm of rank k and degree k(g − 1), such that
H 0(Ei ⊗ Fj) = 0 ⇐⇒ i = j.
This implies that
there exist m linearly independent generalized theta divisors
ΘF1, . . . , ΘFm in the linear series Lk of dimension m, hence the result. Belkale achieves
this for the general curve X of genus g by degeneration to a rational curve with g nodes.
On such a curve, the problem is translated into an explicit Schubert calculus problem for
a product of Grasmannians. He then uses the connection between the quantum cohomol-
ogy of Grassmanians and representation theory, in particular the Verlinde formula, known
already from work of Witten [Wi]. The subtlety in the argument comes from choosing a
certain part of the intersection numbers involved, which corresponds to fixing the determi-
nant of the Ei.
/
/
(
Generalized theta linear series on moduli spaces of vector bundles on curves
19
To obtain the result on any curve, Marian and Oprea [MO2] follow Belkale's strat-
egy, noting in addition that it is not the Verlinde numbers sr,k, but rather the numbers
(r+k)g
· sr,k that have enumerative meaning. More precisely, in this case formula (3) can
rg
be rewritten as
h0(SUX (r), Lk) =
rg
(r + k)g ·ZQ′
as
k,
such d the intersection numbersRQ′ as
where this time Q′ stands for the Quot scheme of quotients of a trivial bundle of rank r + k.
k − r(g − 1), d is taken to be divisible by k, and sufficiently large so that
Here s := (r + k) d
in particular Q′ is irreducible and of expected dimension (cf. [BDW]). As noted before, for
k count maps from rational curves to Grassmannians,
with certain incidence conditions. After some standard manipulation, this implies that they
count vector bundles Ei as above, without the determinant restriction. On the other hand, a
slight variation on Corollary 5.3 shows that they represent the dimension of certain spaces
of sections on UX (r, 0). Marian and Oprea formulate a new duality statement for these
moduli spaces, which can be seen as an extension of the Wirtinger duality for 2Θ functions
on Jacobians. The count and interpretation above show precisely the following:
Theorem 5.7. ([MO2]) Let L and M be two line bundles of degree g − 1 on X. There
exists a rank-level duality isomorphism
D : H 0(UX (r, 0), OU (kΘM ) ⊗ det∗OJ (ΘL))∨ −→
−→ H 0(UX (k, 0), OU (rΘM ) ⊗ det∗OJ (ΘωX ⊗L−1)).
A restriction argument gives from this without much effort the usual Strange Duality
statement. The argument for arbitrary degree is very similar. Finally, note that recently
Belkale [Bel2] has shown that the global Strange Duality map over the moduli space of
curves is projectively flat (cf. also [Be2] for background on this circle of ideas), which
beautifully completes the picture. This says in particular that knowing the Strange Duality
for any one curve is equivalent to knowing it for an arbitrary curve.
6. BASE POINTS
6.1. Abstract criteria. The geometric interpretation of the Strange Duality stated in Re-
mark 5.6 provides a simple criterion for detecting base points for any linear system Lk
on an arbitrary SUX (r, L) with L ∈ Picd(X).
Lemma 6.1. A vector bundle (class) E in SUX(r, L) is a base point for the linear system
Lk if and only if
H 0(E ⊗ F ) 6= 0, for all F ∈ UX (kr0, k(r0(g − 1) − d0)).
Recently, another abstract description of the base points of these linear series has
emerged. I will briefly describe the general construction. It is well known that there exists
an étale cover M of UX (kr0, k(r0(g −1)−d0)) such that there is a "universal bundle" E on
X × M (cf. [NR2] Proposition 2.4). This allows one to consider a Fourier-Mukai-type cor-
M A⊗ E).8 We fix any
respondence RΨE : D(M ) → D(X) taking an object A to RpX ∗(p∗
generalized theta divisor (or indeed any ample line bundle) on UX(kr0, k(r0(g − 1)− d0)),
8For the statements we are interested in, this is a good as thinking that M is UX (kr0, k(r0(g − 1) − d0))
itself, with the technical problem that for k ≥ 2, and sometimes for k = 1, this moduli space is not fine.
20
Mihnea Popa
and denote abusively by Θ its pullback to M . We consider for m ≫ 0 the Fourier-Mukai
transform
Ek
m := RΨEOM (−mΘ)[dim M ] = Rdim M ΨEOM (−mΘ),
which is a vector bundle on X.9 The equivalence between (1) and (3) in the statement
below was first proved by Hein [He2] (noting that objects essentially equivalent to the
vector bundles Ek
m can be defined alternatively in terms of spectral covers of X). It follows
also, together with the equivalence with (2), as a special case of the theory of GV -sheaves
in [PP2].
Theorem 6.2. ([He2] and [PP2]) Let X be a smooth projective curve of genus g ≥ 2 and
E a vector bundle in SUX (r, L), with L ∈ Picd(X). Then the following are equivalent:
(1) E is not a base point for the linear series Lk.
(2) H 1(E ⊗ Ek
(3) H 0(E ⊗ Ek
m
m) = 0 for all m ≫ 0.
) = 0 for all m ≫ 0.
∨
In the most basic, and by far most studied case, namely when d = r(g−1) (equivalent by
appropriate tensorization to the case d = 0) and k = 1, the Fourier-Mukai correspondence
above is between X and Pic0(X), and Θ is simply a theta divisor on the Picard variety
m are well understood: they are precisely the Raynaud bundles
of X. Here the bundles E1
described in §2.4, which as we saw are stable. Moreover, Hein [He2] provides an effective
bound in (3), which gives hope for a more or less concrete description of the entire base
locus. It would be nice to similarly have a better understanding of all the vector bundles
Ek
m considered in Theorem 6.2. For example one would expect:
Conjecture 6.3. All the vector bundles Ek
m are stable.
6.2. Concrete constructions. Lemma 6.1 was until recently conjectural in essentially ev-
ery other case except for L = OX and k = 1, so most of the existing constructions of
base points are in this case. Putting together what is known up to now, in this case the
conclusion is roughly the following:
(1) There exist basic examples of base points, and even basic families of large dimension
in special ranks, obtained both from the Raynaud examples [Ra], and from the examples
in [Po1]. Still basic examples, following the ideas of the previous two, are examples in
[Po3] (see also Remark 7.18 (2)), respectively [Sch1] and [GT]. Other examples can be
built by applying standard operations (extensions and elementary transformations) to the
basic examples, as in [Ar] or [Sch2], and similarly, but more subtly, in [Pau], based also
on some ideas in [Hit].
Example 6.4. Let me explain the most basic constructions. To begin with, let's restate
Corollary 6.1 in this case.
Corollary 6.5. E is a base point for L if and only if H 0(E ⊗ L) 6= 0 for all L ∈
Picg−1(X).
9This, and the second equality above, are due to the fact that mΘ is taken sufficiently positive. We abusively
omit in the notation the choice of ample line bundle made on M.
Generalized theta linear series on moduli spaces of vector bundles on curves
21
By twisting with an effective line bundle in order to obtain the slope µ = g − 1, we see
that it is enough to construct semistable vector bundles E satisfying
(∗) µ(E) ∈ Z, µ(E) ≤ g − 1, h0(E ⊗ ξ) 6= 0 for all ξ ∈ Pic0(X).
Lazarsfeld's bundles II [Po1]. Let's go back to the Lazarsfeld bundles considered in §2.3.
Let L be a line bundle on X of degree d ≥ 2g + 1 and consider the evaluation sequence
We saw that QL = M ∨
that if x1, . . . , xd−g−1 are general points on X, then we have an inclusion
0 −→ ML −→ H 0(L) ⊗ OX −→ L −→ 0.
L is a stable bundle, and µ(QL) = d
d−g < 2. Recall that we showed
d−g−1Mi=1
OX (xi) ֒→ QL.
Passing to exterior powers, we obtain for any p an inclusion
M1≤j1<...<jp≤d−g−1
OX (xj1 + . . . + xjp ) ֒→
p^ QL.
This has the consequence that
h0(
p^ QL ⊗ OX (y1 + . . . + yp − x1 − . . . − xp)) 6= 0
for any general points y1, . . . , yp and x1, . . . , xp on X. Such differences of points cover
what is called the difference variety Xp − Xp ⊂ Pic0(X). This has dimension 2p, hence in
particular we have Pic0(X) = Xγ − Xγ, where γ := [ g+1
2 ]. By semicontinuity we finally
deduce that
h0(
γ^ QL ⊗ ξ) 6= 0, for all ξ ∈ Pic0(X).
is certainly possible:
Since at least in characteristic zeroVγ QL is semistable, in order to satisfy condition (∗)
we only need to make a choice such that µ(Vγ QL) = γ · µ(QL) = γd
µ(Vγ QL) = γ + 1. In conclusion, starting with a sufficiently high rank, L will have
d−g ∈ Z. This
the simplest such choice is to take d = g(γ + 1), which gives
base points.10 It is explained in [Po1] that a more careful construction provides higher
dimensional families of such examples (with fixed determinant).
Raynaud's bundles II [Ra]. Raynaud's vector bundles discussed in §2.4 also provide
such examples. This was the first known construction of base points for L, as noted by
Beauville [Be2]. Let's see how it works: recall that such a bundle E is the restriction to an
Abel-Jacobi embedding X ⊂ J(X) of the Fourier-Mukai transform F = \OJ(X)(−mΘ).
Consider U ⊂ J(X) an open subset where OJ(X)(mΘ) is trivial. By Mukai's inversion
1F ⊗ Pp−1
theorem [Mu2] Theorem 2.2, bF ∼= (−1J(X))∗OJ(X)(−mΘ), so it is trivial on U as well.
By definition, bF ∼= p2∗(p∗
1F ⊗ P). Thus our choice means that there exists 0 6= s ∈
2 (U)). Hence there exists x0 ∈ J(X) such that s{x0}×U 6= 0. But we can
Γ(p∗
choose our Abel-Jacobi embedding of X to pass through x0. This implies that sX×U ∈
1F ⊗ PX×U ) is non-zero, which reinterpreted means that H 0(E ⊗ ξ) 6= 0 for ξ ∈
Γ(p∗
Pic0(X) general. By semicontinuity this has to hold then for all ξ ∈ Pic0(X). As we saw
10Note that starting with a base point in rank r, one can always obtain a base point in any rank s > r by
adding for example the trivial bundle of rank s − r.
22
Mihnea Popa
in §2.4, the slope of E is g
m . If mg, then E satisfies condition (∗). It turns out that these
examples are the first level of a more general class of bundles with the same property, of
rank mg and slope kg
m , for any k < m coprime with m; see Remark 7.18 (2).
(2) For each genus g, there exist base points for the linear series L on SUX (r) for every
rank r ≥ r0 = g + 2, while for hyperelliptic curves they exist for every rank r ≥ r0 = 4
(see [Pau]; cf. also [Ar] for the weaker bound r ≥ r0 = 1
2 (g + 1)(g + 2)). This suggests
that the lower bound r0 might depend on the curve X.
(3) If Br := Bs L ⊂ SUX (r), then
dim Br + (s − r)2(g − 1) + 1 ≤ dim Bs,
for all s ≥ r.
This follows roughly speaking by adding all semistable bundles of rank s − r to the base
points (cf. [Ar]).
My favorite problem remains giving examples of basic base points, as in (1).
It is
probably no accident that essentially all nontrivial classes of examples of vector bundles on
curves we know of have to do with this problem! Also, given the successive improvements,
it is perhaps time to ask:
Question 6.6. What is a good estimate for the dimension of the base locus of L? More-
over, can one give a reasonably concrete description of the entire base locus?
A full description of the base locus is known in genus 2 and rank 4: it is a reduced finite
set of cardinality 16, consisting of Raynaud-type bundles (cf. [Hit] and [Pau]).
6.3. Other determinants or levels. A base point for Lk, k ≥ 2, is of course also a base
point for L, so the most comprehensive construction problem is that of base points of L.
In [Po1] it is explained however that there is a concrete way of constructing base points for
higher k (and also for determinants L 6= OX). This is an indirect construction, based on
combining Raynaud's examples and the existence of subbundles of large enough degree of
a fixed vector bundle.
Lemma 6.7. Let E be a semistable bundle on X, such that h0(E ⊗ ξ) 6= 0 for all ξ ∈
Pic0(X). If k ≤
µ(E)+1 is an integer, then H 0(E ⊗ F ) 6= 0 for all vector bundles F with
µ(F ) = g − 1 − µ(E).
g
Proof. If F has rank k and degree e, then by the theorem of Lange and Mukai-Sakai (cf.
Remark 4.2(3)) we know that there exists a sub-line bundle M ֒→ F of degree
deg(M ) ≥
e − (k − 1)g
k
.
The inequality in the hypothesis implies precisely that deg(M ) ≥ 0, which, given the other
condition in the hypothesis, implies that H 0(E ⊗ M ) 6= 0. This gives immediately that
H 0(E ⊗ F ) 6= 0.
(cid:3)
Combining this with Lemma 6.1, one obtains
Corollary 6.8. Let L ∈ Picd(X) for some d.
satisfying Raynaud's condition:
If E is a vector bundle in SUX(r, L)
H 0(E ⊗ ξ) 6= 0, for all ξ ∈ Pic0(X),
Generalized theta linear series on moduli spaces of vector bundles on curves
23
then E ∈ BsLk for all integers k ≤ g
d0+r0
.
One concrete consequence that deserves special notice is
Corollary 6.9. Raynaud's examples with integral slope µ = g/n produce, after twisting
with appropriate line bundles, base points in Lk on SUX (r) if k ≤ gn
g+n , where r = ng.
Thus k can be made arbitrarily large if g and n are chosen appropriately, which rules out
the possibility of a fixed bound on all SUX (r). The reader can draw similar conclusions in
other degrees by playing with the known examples satisfying Raynaud's condition, listed
in the previous subsection.
Problem 6.10. Find a direct way of constructing vector bundles E satisfying the condition
H 0(E ⊗ F ) 6= 0 for all semistable bundles F of slope g − 1 − µ(E) and some rank k ≥ 2.
One construction proposed in [Po1] (Remark in §2) is to consider vector bundles of the
form Vp QE, analogous to the Lazarsfeld bundles above, where this time E is a higher
rank vector bundle as opposed to a line bundle. This was carried out recently in [CGT]
for arbitrary determinants (cf. also [GT]), providing positive dimensional families of base
points in various linear series on all moduli spaces.
7. EFFECTIVE RESULTS ON GENERALIZED THETA LINEAR SERIES
7.1. The theta map. Not much is known at the moment about the rational map
θ : SUX (r) 99K rΘ, E → ΘE,
which by Strange Duality can be identified with the map induced by the linear series L.
This is the most natural map defined on the moduli space, but unfortunately we have al-
ready seen in the previous section that usually it is not a morphism. A very nice survey of
what is currently known on the theta map is [Be5]. The reader is referred to it, while here
I will only briefly reproduce the main results.
Theorem 7.1. (1) If r = 2, then θ is a morphism ([Ra]; cf. also [He1] and [Po2]).
(2) Moreover, if r = 2 and X is non-hyperelliptic, then θ is an embedding ([BV1] and
[vGI]), while if X is hyperelliptic, it is 2 : 1 onto its image (cf. [Be1]).
(3) If r = 3, then if X is general θ is a morphism ([Ra]). The same is true for all X if in
addition g = 2 ([Ra]) or g = 3 ([Be4]).
(4) If g = 2, θ is generically finite ([Be4]).
In a few instances the image of the theta map has been determined explicitly. This is
summarized below. It remains a fascinating problem to determine explicitly the moduli
space of vector bundles as an embedded projective variety in other situations.
Theorem 7.2. (1) If g = 2, then SUX(2) ∼= P3 ([NR1]).
(2) If g = 3 and X is non-hyperelliptic, then SUX (2) is isomorphic to the Coble quartic
hypersurface in P7 ([NR3]).
(3) If g = 2, then SUX(3) is a double covering of its image in P8, branched along a sextic
which is the dual of the Coble cubic hypersurface ([Or] and [Ng]).
24
Mihnea Popa
Even less studied is the theta-map for other SUX(r, d), besides the case of rank 2. Here
are some results that I am aware of.
Theorem 7.3. (1) L is very ample on SUX(2, 1) ([BV2]).
(2) If X is hyperelliptic of genus g, then SUX (2, 1) is isomorphic to the subvariety of
the Grassmannian G(g − 2, 2g + 1) parametrizing the (g − 2)-planes contained in the
intersection of two general quadrics in P2g+1 ([DR]).
(3) For arbitrary r, the rational theta map on SUX (r, 1) is generically injective ([BV3]).11
One last interesting thing to note is Beauville's observation [Be3] that there exist (even
stable) examples of vector bundles E, at least of integral slope, which are not characterized
by their theta divisor ΘE. In other words, for every r ≥ 3, there exist genera for which the
theta map on SUX (r) is not injective.
7.2. Basepoint-freeness. Since the linear series L is most of the time not basepoint-free
on SUX(r, d), the next natural thing is to look for effective bounds for the basepoint-
freeness of powers Lm. The remarks at the end of §6 suggest that one should not expect
a bound independent of the rank r. On the other hand, Faltings has shown in [Fa] that
one could eventually generate this linear series only by generalized theta divisors, without
providing an effective bound.
Effective versions of Faltings' results are now available in [Po2] and [PR], improving
on earlier results of Le Potier [LP1] and Hein [He1] which depended on the genus of the
curve. In order to state the general result, I will need some notation. Let d be an arbitrary
integer and let as usual h = (r, d). For the statement it is convenient to introduce another
invariant of the moduli space. If E ∈ SUX(r, d) and 1 ≤ k ≤ r − 1, as in [La] we define
sk(E) := kd − rek, where ek is the maximum degree of a subbundle of E of rank k. Note
that if E is stable, one has sk(E) ≥ h and we can further define
sk = sk(r, d) := min
E stable
sk(E) and s = s(r, d) := min
sk.
1≤k≤r−1
Clearly s ≥ h and it is also immediate that s(r, d) = s(r, −d).
Theorem 7.4. (1) ([Po2]) The linear series Lm on SUX(r, d) is basepoint-free for
m ≥ max{[
(r + 1)2
4r
]h, [
r2
4
]
h
s
}.
(2) ([PR]) Slightly better, on SUX(r) the linear series Lm is basepoint-free for m ≥ [ r2
4 ].
The general pattern is that for arbitrary degree one has bounds which are at least as good
as those for degree 0. For example, if d = ±1, then m ≥ r − 1 suffices.
Remark 7.5. What should we have definitely expected at worst? Fujita's Conjecture pre-
dicts basepoint-freeness for ωSUX ⊗ Lp with p ≥ dim SUX + 1 (and one more for very
ampleness). Given the formula for ωSUX in Theorem 3.1, this would predict the bound
k ≥ (r2 − 1)(g − 1) + 1 − 2h for basepoint-freeness, with h = (r, d), which is also
quadratic in r but depends on the genus.
11In loc. cit. it is also stated that it is a morphism, but unfortunately this seems to have a gap.
Generalized theta linear series on moduli spaces of vector bundles on curves
25
Sketch of proof of Theorem 7.4 (2) (cf. [Po2] §4 for details). (Part (1) goes along the same
lines, but is slightly more technical.) The crucial point is to relate this to Quot schemes.
Proposition 7.6. If E ∈ SUX(r) and dim Quotk,d(E) ≤ m · d for all 1 ≤ k ≤ r − 1,
then E 6∈ Bs Lk.
Proof. (Sketch.) It suffices to show that there exists F ∈ UX (m, m(g − 1)) such that
H 0(E ⊗ F ) = 0. Let's "count" the moduli of F for which this is not the case. In other
words, assume that H 0(E ⊗ F ) 6= 0, i.e.
that there exists a non-zero homomorphism
E∨ φ
→ F . This induces a diagram of the form
0
E∨
BBBBBBBB
φ
G
F
where the vector bundle G is the image of φ. The vertical inclusion determines an exact
sequence
(4)
0 −→ G −→ F −→ H ′ −→ 0,
where H ′ might have a torsion part τa of length a. This induces a diagram as follows,
where H is locally free of rank m − k and degree m(g − 1) − d − a.
0
0
/ G
∼=
/ G
0
0
0
G′
0
τa
/ F
H ′
H
0
∼= /
/ H
0
Clearly then, for fixed degree, the moduli of such G's and G′'s satisfy
dim {G′} ≤ dim {G} + ka.
Now note that if d is the degree of G, then d runs only over a finite set of integers, since E∨
and F are semistable. Thus we can do the calculation for any fixed d. Now the dimension
of the moduli of such F 's is at most the dimension of the space of vertical extensions in
the diagram above, so we can try to estimate that. We have
(5) dim {F } ≤ dim {G}d + ka + dim {H}m(g−1)−d−a + dim Ext1(H ⊕ τ, G) − 1.
/
/
/
/
_
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
26
Mihnea Popa
On the other hand, the dimension of the moduli of G's in the diagram can be bounded
above by the dimension of the space of quotients of E of the type of G, which is in turn
bounded by hypothesis:
(6)
dim {G}d ≤ dim Quotk,d(E) ≤ m · d.
Since F ∈ UX (m, m(g − 1)) form a bounded family, for a fixed degree the H's must
form a bounded family too (this is in fact a subset of a relative Quot scheme). The well-
known Lemma 7.7 below implies then the estimate
(7)
dim {H}m(g−1)−d−a ≤ (rk H)2(g − 1) + 1 = (m − k)2(g − 1) + 1.
For the space of extensions, using Serre duality we have
(8)
Finally, since F is stable, by Exercise 2.9 we have h0(H ∨ ⊗ G) = 0, so we can use
Riemann-Roch to compute
dim Ext1(H ⊕ τa, G) = h1(H ∨ ⊗ G) + ka.
(9)
h1(H ∨ ⊗ G) = k(m − k)(g − 1 −
d
k
+
m(g − 1) − d − a
m − k
).
Putting together (5), (6), (7), (8) and (9), after a slightly tedious calculation one gets
dim {F } ≤ m2(g − 1) < dim UX (m, m(g − 1)),
so for the general F we must have H 0(E ⊗ F ) = 0.
(cid:3)
Lemma 7.7 (cf. [NR2], Proposition 2.6). Let S be a scheme of finite type over k, and E on
X × S a vector bundle such that all Es := EX×{s} have rank r and degree d. Then there
exists a variety T (irreducible, nonsingular), and a vector bundle F on X × T , such that
all vector bundles Es and all stable bundles of rank r and degree d are among the Ft's,
t ∈ T .
Going back to the proof of Theorem 7.4, now the key point is to use the bound for the
dimension of Quot schemes provided by Theorem 4.1. In view of this and the discussion
above, what's left to note is that if E ∈ SUX (r) is stable, then
k(r − k) + (d − dk)r ≤ d · [
r2
4
]
for all d and all k.
7.3. Very ampleness. Aside from the beautiful results of Brivio-Verra and van Geemen-
Izadi mentioned above, showing that in rank 2 the theta map is usually an embedding, in
general one has to go to even higher powers than in the previous subsection in order to
achieve this. Faltings' basepoint-freeness method was extended by Esteves [Es] to point
separation and separation of tangent vectors at smooth points, the starting point being the
criterion in Corollary 3.3(3). This, together with the method in [Po2] described in §7.2, is
Generalized theta linear series on moduli spaces of vector bundles on curves
27
used in [EP] to obtain effective very ampleness bounds. There is however an obstruction
to obtaining a complete result for arbitrary rank and degree: at the moment we don't know
how to separate tangent vectors at singular points of the moduli space using generalized
theta divisors. Thus very ampleness is obtained only in the case (r, d) = 1, while in general
we only have an injective map which separates tangent vectors at smooth points.
Theorem 7.8. ([EP]) For each m ≥ r2 + r the linear series Lm on SUX (r, d) separates
points, and separates tangent vectors on the smooth locus SU s
X(r, d). In particular, if r
and d are coprime, then Lm is very ample.
Note that here, unlike in Theorem 7.4, the result does not depend on the degree.
suspect that the bound for very ampleness should hold in general.12
Conjecture 7.9. The very ampleness bound r2 + r holds for any rank and degree.
I
In order to attack this problem, one likely needs a good understanding of the tangent
cone, and space, to the moduli space of vector bundles at a singular (i.e. not stable) point.
Steps in this direction have been made only in some very special cases, already quite
difficult, by Laszlo [Las] and Serman [Ser]. Thus the following is an important open
problem about the structure of the moduli space.
Problem 7.10. Find a useful description of the tangent cone to UX (r, d) at a singular
point.
7.4. Verlinde bundles and bounds for UX (r, d). Essentially the same effective
basepoint-freeness and very ampleness bounds hold replacing SUX (r, d) by UX (r, d).
This however does not follow immediately, since this time one has to worry about the
determinant of the vector bundles corresponding to the generalized theta divisors used in
the proof. Instead, one applies results specific to the study of sheaves on abelian varieties to
some natural vector bundles on the Jacobian of X. These were introduced in [Po3] under
the name of Verlinde bundles, and are further studied in [Op1] and [Op2].
Specifically, let M be a line bundle of degree d on X and πM the composition
πM : UX (r, d)
det
−→ Picd(X)
⊗M −1
−→ J(X).
Set for simplicity U := UX(r, d) and J := J(X). Fix F ∈ UX (r0, r0(g − 1) − d0) which
admits a generalized theta divisor; thus ΘF is a basic theta divisor. Put
where I simplify the notation, but remember the choice of r, d, M, F .
Em := πM ∗OU (mΘF ),
The fibers of πM are the SUX (r, L), for L running over all line bundles of degree d
on X, and OU (ΘF )SUX (r,L) = L, the determinant line bundle on SUX(r, L). Kodaira
vanishing (for varieties with rational singularities) and base change imply that Em is a
vector bundle of rank equal to the Verlinde number sr,d,m. One of the main properties of
the Verlinde bundles is the following: if φr : J(X) → J(X) denotes the multiplication by
r map on the Jacobian of X, then
φ∗
OJ (mrr0ΘN ),
(10)
rEm ∼= Msr,d,k
12Note however that a sharper bound is proposed in Conjecture 7.20.
28
Mihnea Popa
where N ∈ Picg−1(X) is a line bundle such that N ⊗r ∼= L ⊗ (detF )⊗h (this follows
from Exercise 3.2 and the push-pull formula). Such bundles are called semihomogeneous;
an alternative description of this property is that for every x ∈ J(X) there exists α ∈
xEm ∼= Em ⊗ α. Equation (10) implies that the Em are well
Pic0(J(X)) such that t∗
understood cohomologically.
On the other hand, on an abelian variety A there are precise cohomological criteria for
the global generation of coherent sheaves or the surjectivity of multiplication maps, relying
on the use of the Fourier-Mukai functor
RbS : D(A) → D(bA), RbS(F ) := Rp bA∗(p∗
AF ⊗ P ),
where P is a Poincaré bundle on A × bA. A coherent sheaf F on X satisfies IT0 (the Index
Theorem with index 0) if RbS(F ) = R0bS(F ), which is equivalent to H i(F ⊗ α) = 0 for
all α ∈ Pic0(A) and all i > 0. From our point of view here, the key result is the following
-- it was proved first for locally free sheaves in [Pa], and then for arbitrary coherent sheaves
in the more general context of M -regularity in [PP1].
Theorem 7.11. Let F be a coherent sheaf on A satisfying IT0. Then, for any ample line
bundle L on A, the sheaf F ⊗ L is globally generated.
In the context of Verlinde bundles, the decomposition formula (10) allows one to check
the IT0 property for the sheaves
• Em ⊗ OJ (−ΘN ), for m ≥ h + 1.
• Em ⊗ Ia ⊗ OJ (−ΘN ), where a ∈ J(X) is any point, for m ≥ 2h + 1.
• (Emb∗ Em) ⊗ OJ (−ΘN ), whereb∗ denotes the skew-Pontrjagin product (cf. [Pa]),
for m ≥ 2h + 1.
In combination with Theorem 7.11, this implies:
Proposition 7.12. ([Po3], [EP]) (1) Em is globally generated if and only if m ≥ h + 1.
(2) Em ⊗ Ia is globally generated for m ≥ 2h + 1, for any point a ∈ J(X).
(3) For m ≥ 2h + 1, the multiplication map
H 0(Em) ⊗ H 0(Em) −→ H 0(E⊗2
m )
is surjective.
Remark 7.13. In [Po3], I incorrectly claimed that for m = r · p, the Verlinde bundles
Em decompose as direct sums of O(pΘ).13 In fact, in [Op1] Oprea shows by an explicit
calculation that on elliptic curves, as part of a general result, for rm a decomposition into
a direct sum of line bundles does exist, but the factors are various twists of O(pΘ) by
different torsion line bundles. More recently, he has obtained for any genus and d = 0 a
decomposition of Em into simple semihomogeneous factors, at least when h = (r, m) is
odd. This is discussed in Remark 7.18 below.
Based on Proposition 7.12 and the results for SUX(r, d) in Theorems 7.4 and 7.8, one
can then deduce via standard fibration arguments the corresponding results for UX (r, d),
13Note that this also led to an erroneous statement in loc.cit., Theorem 5.3, namely the Claim that OU (rΘ)
is not globally generated on UX (r, 0); cf. also Remark 7.15. I thank D. Oprea for pointing this out.
Generalized theta linear series on moduli spaces of vector bundles on curves
29
together with projective normality statements (see [Po3] §5,6) which I will not include
here.
Theorem 7.14. Let ΘF be a basic generalized theta divisor on UX (r, d).
(1) ([Po3]) The linear series mΘF is basepoint-free for m ≥ max{[ (r+1)2
4r
]h, [ r2
4 ] h
s }.
(2) ([PR]) Slightly better, on UX (r, 0) the linear series mΘF is basepoint-free for m ≥
max{[ r2
4 ], r + 1}.
(3) ([EP]) For each m ≥ r2 + r, the linear series mΘF on UX(r, d) separates points,
and separates tangent vectors on the smooth locus U s
X (r, d). In particular, if r and d are
coprime, then mΘF is very ample.
Remark 7.15. The following fact, which was communicated to me by D. Oprea, shows
that one is at least sometimes able to do better then the bound r + 1 in (2) above, on
UX(r, 0).
Proposition 7.16. (D. Oprea) If L is basepoint-free on SUX(r), then 2ΘL is basepoint-
free on UX (r, 0) for any L ∈ Picg−1(X). In particular, by Theorem 7.1, this holds when
r = 2 and when r = 3 and X is generic.
Proof. This goes essentially as in the case of abelian varieties. First, by the geometric
interpretation of Strange Duality, Remark 5.6, L is generated by theta divisors, which
can be easily translated as saying that for each E in UX (r, 0), H 0(E ⊗ M ) = 0 for
M ∈ Picg−1(X) general. Now if L ∈ Picg−1(X) is any line bundle, then in the linear
series 2ΘL on UX (r, 0) we have all reducible divisors of the form ΘL⊗A + ΘL⊗A−1, for
A ∈ Pic0(X). By the observation above, any fixed E is avoided by such a divisor if A is
general.
(cid:3)
The same techniques, combined with the sharp results on very ampleness for rank 2
bundles with fixed determinant mentioned at the beginning of §7, imply in rank 2 a better
result.
Theorem 7.17. ([EP]) Let ΘF be a basic generalized theta divisor on UX(2, d). If d is
odd, then 3ΘF is very ample. If d is even, and C is not hyperelliptic, then 5ΘF is very
ample.
Remark 7.18 (Decomposition, and other uses of the Verlinde bundles; cf.
[Op2],
[Po3]). (1) The Fourier-Mukai transform of the Verlinde bundles is an equally useful ob-
ject in terms of linear series on moduli spaces. For simplicity, let's assume here that d = 0,
and redenote Em by Er,m, to include the rank. The Strange Duality isomorphism (cf.
§5.2), in fact their collection over all moduli spaces SUX(r, L), can be interpreted as a
natural isomorphism
(11)
SD : E∨
r,m −→ [Em,r,
where the hat denotes the Fourier-Mukai transform coming from the dual Jacobian. One
can for instance show that for m = 1 this is an isomorphism by checking the stability of
the bundles involved (see [Po3] §3). Furthermore, Oprea shows in [Op2] the following
statement on the decomposition of Er,m into simple semihomogeneous (hence stable by
[Mu1]) factors, extending his previous result for elliptic curves in [Op1].
30
Mihnea Popa
Theorem 7.19 ([Op2], Theorem 1). If (r, k) = 1 and h is odd, the Verlinde bundle Ehr,hk
splits as
Ehr,hk ∼=Mξ
W ⊕mξ(r,k)
r,k,ξ
where ξ runs over all h-torsion line bundles on J(X) .
The notation is as follows: Oprea deduces from results in Mukai [Mu1] that on a principally
polarized abelian variety (A, Θ) with Θ symmetric, for every coprime integers r and k
there exists a unique symmetric simple semihomogeneous bundle Wr,k such that
rk Wr,k = rg, det Wr,k = OA(rg−1kΘ).
(Symmetric means (−1)∗Wr,k ∼= Wr,k; without this requirement uniqueness is not satis-
fied.) One can easily check that for every ξ ∈ Pic0(J(X)) and ¯ξ an r-th root of ξ, the
bundle Wr,k ⊗ ¯ξ depends only on ξ. We then denote
Wr,k,ξ := Wr,k ⊗ ¯ξ.
The multiplicities mξ(r, k) are computed explicitly in [Op2], by means of a calculation of
the trace of the action of h-torsion points on the spaces of generalized theta functions (itself
very interesting), but I will not reproduce the complicated formula here. They depend on
the Verlinde numbers on a higher genus curve (see loc. cit., Theorem 2). One can check
∼= \Wk,r,ξ and mξ(r, k) = mξ(k, r), hence the decomposition in the Theorem
that W ∨
agrees term by term with the Strange Duality isomorphism (11). This does not however
reprove Theorem 5.5, as the various isomorphisms are not known to be compatible with
the map in (11).
r,k,ξ
(2) Finally, with suitable choices of r, m, and g, it is shown in [Po3] that the restriction
of [Em,r to a suitable Abel-Jacobi embedding of X provides a class of base points for the
series L on SUX(r) extending Raynaud's examples discussed in §6.2. However, as the
decomposition in Theorem 7.19 is now available, let me note that this is really a statement
about the bundles Wr,k (and their twists). Indeed, precisely as in [Po3] §4, using (16) in
r,m to a suitable embedding
[Op2] instead of (10) here, one sees that the restriction of W ∨
of X in its Jacobian is a semistable vector bundle of rank mg and slope kg
m , satisfying
condition (∗) in §6.2 when k < m and mg. Raynaud's examples are exactly the case
k = 1; note that the argument works for the Fourier-Mukai transform of every simple
semihomogeneous bundle.
7.5. Conjectures. It is likely that various effective bounds mentioned above are not op-
timal. In particular one hopes for linear bounds in the rank. Inspired by the low-rank
cases and the uniform bound for the global generation of Verlinde bundles in 7.12, I would
speculate the following:
Conjecture 7.20. (a) If Θ is a basic theta divisor, the linear series mΘ on UX (r, 0) is
(1) basepoint-free for m ≥ r + 1.
(2) very ample for m ≥ 2r + 1.
(b) The linear series Lm on SUX(r) is
(1) basepoint-free for m ≥ r − 1.
(2) very ample for m ≥ 2r + 1.
Generalized theta linear series on moduli spaces of vector bundles on curves
31
(c) The bounds are at least as good on UX (r, d) and SUX (r, d) with d 6= 0.
Remark 7.21. (1) In the Conjecture, (a) trivially implies (b), with r + 1 instead of r − 1
in the case of basepoint-freeness, by restriction.
(2) More importantly, (b) implies (a) via the same procedure using Verlinde bundles on
Jacobians.
(3) The main appeal of the conjecture in (a) is that it directly extends the case of classical
theta functions of Jacobians (and more generally ample divisors on any abelian variety)
given by the Lefschetz theorem, as a linear function in the rank. As we see for example
in Proposition 7.15, this would still not always be optimal, but at the moment no general
machinery seems to indicate towards a better guess. The conjecture in (b) is a bit more
speculative. Also, there is again the possibility that one can do even better. For instance,
Beauville conjectures in [Be5] that L is basepoint-free on SUX(3), which would be be-
low this bound. It is even harder to predict a bound for very ampleness on SUX(r), so
somewhat inconsistently I haven't even attempted to go beyond what is implied by (a),
namely that it should be better than 2r + 1. In the same vein, it is not yet clear what
sharper conjecture should replace (c) above in the case of arbitrary degree.
REFERENCES
[Ab]
[Ar]
T. Abe, On SL(2) -- GL(n) strange duality, J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 46 (2006), no. 3, 657 -- 692.
D. Arcara, A lower bound for the dimension of the base locus of the generalized theta divisor, C. R.
Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 340 (2005), no. 2, 131 -- 134.
M. F. Atiyah, Vector bundles over an elliptic curve, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 7 (1957), 414 -- 452.
[At]
[Be1] A. Beauville, Fibrés de rang 2 sur les courbes, fibré determinant et fonctions thêta, Bull. Soc. Math. Fr.
116 (1988), 431 -- 448.
[Be2] A. Beauville, Vector bundles on curves and generalized theta functions: recent results and open prob-
lems, in Current topics in algebraic geometry, Cambridge Univ. Press (1995), 17 -- 33.
[Be3] A. Beauville, Some stable vector bundles with reducible theta divisor, Manuscripta Math. 110 (2003),
no. 3, 343 -- 349.
[Be4] A. Beauville, Vector bundles and theta functions on curves of genus 2 and 3, Amer. J. of Math. 128
(2006), 607 -- 618.
[Be5] A. Beauville, Vector bundles on curves and theta functions, Moduli Spaces and Arithmetic Geometry
(Kyoto 2004), Advanced Studies in Pure Math. 45 (2006), 145 -- 156.
[BNR] A. Beauville, M.S. Narasimhan and S. Ramanan, Spectral curves and the generalized theta divisor, J.
[Bel1]
[Bel2]
Reine Angew. Math. 398 (1989), 169 -- 179.
P. Belkale, The Strange Duality conjecture for generic curves, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 21 (2008), no. 1,
235 -- 258.
P. Belkale, Strange Duality and the Hitchin/WZW connection, J. Differential Geom. 82 (2009), no. 2,
445 -- 465.
[BDW] A. Bertram, G. Daskalopoulos and R. Wentworth, Gromov invariants for holomorphic maps from Rie-
[BV1]
mann surfaces to Grasmannians, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 9 (1996), 529 -- 571.
S. Brivio and A. Verra, The theta divisor of SUC (2)s is very ample if C is not hyperelliptic, Duke
Math. J. 82 (1996), 503 -- 552.
S. Brivio and A. Verra, On the theta divisor of SU(2, 1), Internat. J. Math. 10 (1999), 925 -- 942.
S. Brivio and A. Verra, On the theta divisor of SU(r, 1), Nagoya Math. J. 165 (2002), 179 -- 193.
[BV2]
[BV3]
[CGT] S. Casalaina-Martin, T. Gwena and M. Teixidor i Bigas, Some examples of vector bundles in the base
[DR]
[DT]
[DN]
locus of the generalized theta divisor, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 347 (2009), no. 3-4, 173 -- 176.
U. Desale and S. Ramanan, Classification of vector bundles of rank 2 on hyperelliptic curves, Invent.
Math. 38 (1976), 161 -- 185.
R. Donagi and L. Tu, Theta functions for SL(n) versus GL(n), Math. Res. Lett. 1 (1994), 345 -- 357.
J.-M. Drezet and M.S. Narasimhan, Groupe de Picard des variétés des modules de fibrés semi-stables
sur les courbes algébriques, Invent. Math. 97 (1989), 53 -- 94.
Mihnea Popa
32
[EL1]
[EL2]
[Es]
[EP]
L. Ein and R. Lazarsfeld, Stability and restrictions of Picard bundles, with an application to the normal
bundles of elliptic curves, in Complex Projective Geometry, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., 179
(1992), 149 -- 156.
L. Ein and R. Lazarsfeld, Singularities of theta divisors and the birational geometry of irregular varieties,
J. Amer. Math.Soc. 10 (1997), 243 -- 258.
E. Esteves, Separation properties of theta functions, Duke Math J. 98 (1999), 565 -- 593.
E. Esteves and M. Popa, Effective very ampleness for generalized theta divisors, Duke Math. J. 123
(2004), 429 -- 444.
G. Faltings, Stable G-bundles and projective connections, J. Algebraic Geom. 2 (1993), 507 -- 568.
[Fa]
[FMP] G. Farkas, M. Musta¸ta and M. Popa, Divisors on Mg,g+1 and the Minimal Resolution Conjecture for
[FP]
[vGI]
[GT]
points on canonical curves, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Sup. 36 (2003), 553 -- 581.
G. Farkas and M. Popa, Effective divisors on Mg, curves on K3 surfaces, and the Slope Conjecture, J.
Algebraic Geom. 14 (2005), 241 -- 267.
B. van Geemen and E. Izadi, The tangent space to the moduli space of vector bundles on a curve and the
singular locus of the theta divisor of the Jacobian, Journal of Alg. Geom. 10 (2001), 133 -- 177.
T. Gwena and M. Teixidor, Maps between moduli spaces of vector bundles and the base locus of the
theta divisor, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 137 (2009), no. 3, 853 -- 861.
[He1] G. Hein, On the generalized theta divisor, Contrib. to Alg. and Geom. 38 (1997), No.1, 95 -- 98.
[He2] G. Hein, Raynaud's vector bundles and base points of the generalized Theta divisor, Math. Z. 257 (2007),
[Hit]
[JK]
no. 3, 597 -- 611.
G. Hitching, Rank four symplectic bundles without theta divisors over a curve of genus two, Internat. J.
Math. 19 (2008), no. 4, 387 -- 420.
L. Jeffrey and F. Kirwan, Intersection theory on moduli spaces of holomorphic bundles of arbitrary rank
on a Riemann surface, Ann. of Math. (2) 148, no.1, 109 -- 196.
[JKKW] L. Jeffrey, Y.-H. Kiem, F. Kirwan and J. Woolf, Intersection pairings on singular moduli spaces of
bundles over a Riemann surface and their partial desingularisations, Transform. Groups 11 (2006), no.
3, 439 -- 494.
H. Lange, Zur Klassifikation von Regelmannigfaltigkeiten, Math. Ann. 262 (1983), 447 -- 459.
Y. Laszlo, Local structure of the moduli space of vector bundles over curves, Comment. Math. Helv. 71
(1996), 373 -- 401.
[La]
[Las]
[Laz1] R. Lazarsfeld, A sampling of vector bundle techniques in the study of linear series, in Lectures on
Riemann Surfaces, World Scientific Press, Singapore (1989), 500 -- 559.
[Laz2] R. Lazarsfeld, Positivity in algebraic geometry I & II, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebi-
[LP1]
ete, vol. 48 & 49, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004.
J. Le Potier, Module des fibrés semi-stables et fonctions thêta, Proc. Symp. Taniguchi Kyoto 1994:
Moduli of vector bundles, M. Maruyama ed., Lecture Notes in Pure and Appl. Math. 179 (1996), 83 --
101.
J. Le Potier, Lectures on vector bundles, Cambridge Univ. Press (1997).
[LP2]
[MO1] A. Marian and D. Oprea, Counts of maps to Grassmannians and intersection theory on the moduli space
of bundles, J. Differential Geom. 76 (2007), 81 -- 113.
[MO2] A. Marian and D. Oprea, The level-rank duality for nonabelian theta functions, Invent. Math. 168 (2007),
225 -- 247.
[MO3] A. Marian and D. Oprea, A tour of theta dualities on moduli spaces of sheaves, Curves and abelian
[Mu1]
[Mu2]
[MS]
varieties, Contemp. Math. 465, 175 -- 201, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2008.
S. Mukai, Semi-homogeneous vector bundles on an abelian variety, J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 18 (1978),
no.2, 239 -- 272.
S. Mukai, Duality between D(X) and D( bX) with its application to Picard sheaves, Nagoya Math. J.
81 (1981),153 -- 175.
S. Mukai and F. Sakai, Maximal subbundles of vector bundles on a curve, Manuscripta Math. 52 (1985),
251 -- 256.
[NR1] M. S. Narasimhan and S. Ramanan, Moduli of vector bundles on a compact Riemann surface, Ann. of
Math. (2) 89 (1969), 14 -- 51.
[NR2] M. S. Narasimhan and S. Ramanan, Deformations of the moduli space of vector bundles over an alge-
braic curve, Ann of Math (2) 101 (1975), 391 -- 417.
[NR3] M. S. Narasimhan and S. Ramanan, 2θ-linear systems on abelian varieties, Vector bundles on algebraic
[Ng]
varieties, 415 -- 427, Oxford University Press (1987).
Q. M. Nguyen, Vector bundles, duality, and classical geometry on a curve of genus two, Internat. J.
Math., 18 (2007), no. 5, 535 -- 558.
Generalized theta linear series on moduli spaces of vector bundles on curves
33
[Op1] D. Oprea, A note on the Verlinde bundles on elliptic curves, preprint arXiv:0709.0023, to appear in
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.
[Op2] D. Oprea, The Verlinde bundles and the semihomogeneous Wirtinger duality, preprint arXiv:0812.4962,
[Or]
to appear in J. Reine Angew. Math.
A. Ortega, On the moduli space of rank 3 bundles on a genus 2 curve and the Coble cubic, J. Algebraic
Geom. 14 (2005), 327 -- 356.
G. Pareschi, Syzygies of abelian varieties, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 13 (2000), 651 -- 664.
[Pa]
[PP1] G. Pareschi and M. Popa, Regularity on abelian varieties I, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 16 (2003), 285 -- 302.
[PP2] G. Pareschi and M. Popa, GV -sheaves, Fourier-Mukai transform, and Generic Vanishing, preprint
[Pau]
math.AG/0608127, to appear in Amer. J. Math.
Ch. Pauly, On the base locus of the linear system of generalized theta functions, Math. Res. Lett. 15
(2008), 699 -- 703.
[Po1] M. Popa, On the base locus of the generalized theta divisor, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 329 (1999), Série I,
507 -- 512.
[Po2] M. Popa, Dimension estimates for Hilbert schemes and effective base point freeness on moduli spaces
of vector bundles on curves, Duke Math J. 107 (2001), 469 -- 495.
[Po3] M. Popa, Verlinde bundles and generalized theta linear series, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 354 (2002),
1869 -- 1898.
[PR] M. Popa and M. Roth, Stable maps and Quot schemes, Invent. Math. 152 (2003), 625 -- 663.
[Ra]
[Ser]
M. Raynaud, Sections des fibrés vectoriels sur une courbe, Bull. Soc. Math. France 110 (1982), 103 -- 125.
O. Serman, Local structure of SUC (3) over a curve of genus 2, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris. 344
(2007), no.6, 383 -- 388.
C. S. Seshadri, Fibrés vectoriels sur les courbes algébriques, Astérisque 96, 1982.
[Se]
[Sch1] O. Schneider, Stabilité des fibrés ΛpEL et condition de Raynaud, Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. 14
(2005), 515 -- 525.
[Sch2] O. Schneider, Sur la dimension de l'ensemble des points base du fibré déterminant sur SUC (r), Ann.
[Wi]
Inst. Fourier 57 (2007), no. 2, 481 -- 490.
E. Witten, The Verlinde algebra and the cohomology of the Grassmannian, Geometry, topology, and
physics, 357 -- 422, Conf. Proc. Lecture Notes Geom. Topology, IV, Cambridge MA, 1995.
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO, 851 S. MORGAN ST.,
CHICAGO, IL 60607-7045, USA
E-mail address: [email protected]
|
1409.7115 | 3 | 1409 | 2016-07-15T05:14:54 | Homogeneity of cohomology classes associated with Koszul matrix factorizations | [
"math.AG"
] | In this work we prove the so called dimension property for the cohomological field theory associated with a homogeneous polynomial W with an isolated singularity, in the algebraic framework of arXiv:1105.2903. This amounts to showing that some cohomology classes on the Deligne-Mumford moduli spaces of stable curves, constructed using Fourier-Mukai type functors associated with matrix factorizations, live in prescribed dimension. The proof is based on a homogeneity result established in arXiv:math/0011032 for certain characteristic classes of Koszul matrix factorizations of 0. To reduce to this result we use the theory of Fourier-Mukai type functors involving matrix factorizations and the natural rational lattices in the relevant Hochschild homology spaces, as well as a version of Hodge-Riemann bilinear relations for Hochschild homology of matrix factorizations. Our approach also gives a proof of the dimension property for the cohomological field theories associated with some quasihomogeneous polynomials with an isolated singularity. | math.AG | math |
Homogeneity of cohomology classes associated with
Koszul matrix factorizations
Alexander Polishchuk
Abstract
In this work we prove the so called dimension property for the cohomological field
theory associated with a homogeneous polynomial W with an isolated singularity, in the
algebraic framework of [36]. This amounts to showing that some cohomology classes on
the Deligne-Mumford moduli spaces of stable curves, constructed using Fourier-Mukai
type functors associated with matrix factorizations, live in prescribed dimension. The
proof is based on a homogeneity result established in [33] for certain characteristic
classes of Koszul matrix factorizations of 0. To reduce to this result we use the the-
ory of Fourier-Mukai type functors involving matrix factorizations and the natural
rational lattices in the relevant Hochschild homology spaces, as well as a version of
Hodge-Riemann bilinear relations for Hochschild homology of matrix factorizations.
Our approach also gives a proof of the dimension property for the cohomological field
theories associated with some quasihomogeneous polynomials with an isolated singu-
larity.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 81T70; Secondary 14B05, 16E40
Keywords. Matrix factorization, Fan-Jarvis-Ruan-Witten theory, Hochschild homology
1
Introduction
1.1 Dimension property in Fan-Jarvis-Ruan-Witten theory
Let W ∈ C[x1, . . . , xn] be a quasihomogeneous polynomial with an isolated singularity at
the origin. Fan, Jarvis and Ruan introduced in [16] an analog of the Gromov-Witten theory
associated with W and with a finite subgroup G ⊂ (C∗)n of diagonal symmetries of W
(such that G contains the exponential grading operator J associated with the weights of
the variables x1, . . . , xn). This theory, often referred to as Fan-Jarvis-Ruan-Witten theory
(FJRW-theory), consists of a collection of maps
Λg,r : H ⊗r → H ∗(M g,r, C),
where M g,r is the Deligne-Mumford compactification of the moduli spaces of curves with r
marked points, and H = HW,G is a finite-dimensional vector space associated with (W, G)
(called the space state of the theory). The maps Λg,r satisfy some gluing axioms on the
1
boundary components of M g,r, that constitute the notion of a cohomological field theory,
introduced by Kontsevich and Manin [20]. In fact, the state space of the FJRW-theory has
a decomposition
HW,G =Mγ∈G
H(Wγ)G,
where Wγ = W (An)γ , the restriction of W to the space of γ-invariants, and
H(W (x1, . . . , xn)) := (Ωn
An/(dW ∧ Ωn−1
An ))
(1.1)
(the latter definition is applied to all Wγ). Each component of the map Λg,r factors as a
composition
H(Wγ1)G ⊗ . . . ⊗ H(Wγr )G φg(γ1,...,γr)✲ H ∗(Sg,G(γ1, . . . , γr), C) → H ∗(M g,r, C),
where Sg,G(γ1, . . . , γr) → M g,r is some finite covering, corresponding to choices of generalized
spin-structure (of type γ1, . . . , γr) on a curve. For details, see [16] and [36].
Whereas in the original approach of [16] the maps φg(γ1, . . . , γr) were defined by study-
ing a certain PDE (Witten's equation), in [36] we constructed these maps using Hochschild
homology and the categories of matrix factorizations. More precisely, we use natural em-
beddings
H(W )G ⊂ HH∗(MFG(W )),
where MFG(W ) is the category of G-equivariant matrix factorizations of W , and construct
the maps φg(γ1, . . . , γr) as maps induced on Hochschild homology by some Fourier-Mukai
type functor
MFG(Wγ1 ⊕ . . . ⊕ Wγr ) → Db(Sg,G(γ1, . . . , γr)),
where Db(X) denotes the derived category of coherent sheaves on X.
Conjecturally, the algebraic approach of [36] produces the same theory as in [16], however,
this is currently known to be true only for simple singularities (see [36, Sec. 7]), in the so-
called narrow sectors (see [9]), and for most invertible polynomials and the maximal groups
of symmetries (see [17]). In general, the hope is that the algebraic approach will be more
accessible for calculations (as for example, the work [17] indicates), so it is important to
establish algebraically all the properties of the FJRW-theory.
One of the properties of the maps φg(γ1, . . . , γr) which arises naturally in the analytic
approach of [16] is the dimension property stating that
im(φg(γ1, . . . , γr)) ⊂ H 2Dg(γ1,...,γr)+n1+...+nr (Sg,G(γ1, . . . , γr), C),
(1.2)
with ni = dim(AN )γi and
Dg(γ1, . . . , γr) = (g − 1)c + ιγ1 + . . . + ιγr = −
nXj=1
χ(C, Lj),
where (C, L1, . . . , Ln) is a smooth curve with a generalized spin-structure from the moduli
space Sg,G(γ1, . . . , γr) and the numbers c = cW , ιγ1, . . . , ιγr are determined using the weights
of the variables x1, . . . , xn (see [16, Sec. 3.2]).
2
This property is not at all clear in the algebraic framework of [36]. The goal of this
paper is to prove the dimension property in this framework assuming that W (x1, . . . , xn) is
a homogeneous polynomial, i.e., the degrees of the variables are deg(x1) = . . . = deg(xn) = 1.
More generally, for a quasihomogeneous polynomial W (x1, . . . , xn), where deg(xi) = di >
0, we can define a homogeneous polynomial
fW (y1, . . . , yn) = W (yd1
1 , . . . , ydn
n )
(1.3)
in new variables y1, . . . , yn with deg(yi) = 1. We will prove the dimension property for the
algebraic cohomological field theory associated with (W, G) (for any G) provided fW still has
an isolated singularity at 0.
Theorem 1.1.1. Let W (x1, . . . , xn) be a quasihomogeneous polynomial with an isolated sin-
gularity, G a finite group of diagonal symmetries of W , containing the exponential grading
element. Assume that fW still has an isolated singularity at 0. Then the maps φg(γ1, . . . , γr)
defined in [36] satisfy the dimension property (1.2).
This will be deduced from a more general Theorem 1.2.1 formulated below.
1.2 Purity of dimension for functors associated with Koszul ma-
trix factorizations
Let W (x1, . . . , xn) be a quasihomogeneous polynomial of degree d, where deg(xi) = di > 0,
with an isolated singularity at the origin, and denote by MFGm(W ) the category of Gm-
equivariant matrix factorizations of W (see Sec. 2.5 below). Here Gm acts on An by
λ · (x1, . . . , xn) = (λd1x1, . . . , λdnxn).
(1.4)
Let also X be a smooth projective variety. We are going to prove a certain purity of
dimension for the maps
H(W ) := HH∗(MFGm(W )) → H ∗(X, C)
induced by Fourier-Mukai functors
DMFGm(W ) → Db(X)
of a special kind, where DMFGm(W ) is the derived category of Gm-equivariant matrix fac-
torizations of W .
Here is the precise setup. Assume that A is a Gm-equivariant vector bundle on X, where
Gm acts trivially on X, equipped with a surjective Gm-morphism of OX-modules
z : A → On
X ,
where Gm acts on On
X with the weights (d1, . . . , dn) Let tot(A) be the total space of this
vector bundle, and let p : tot(A) → X be the natural projection. Note that z corresponds
to a morphism
Z : tot(A) → An,
3
linear on the fibers of p and Gm-equivariant with respect to the action (1.4) on An. Let
B be another Gm-equivariant vector bundle on X and suppose we have Gm-morphisms of
OX -modules
α : ⊕N
i=1Si(A) → B∨{d}, β : A → B,
where Sm(·) denotes the mth symmetric power, and {d} denotes the twist by the character
λ 7→ λd of Gm We can view α and β as Gm-invariant sections of induced bundles on tot(A):
α ∈ H 0(tot(A), p∗B∨{d}), β ∈ H 0(tot(A), p∗B).
The main assumption is that these sections satisfy
hα, βi = −Z ∗W,
and that the common vanishing locus of α and β coincides with the zero section in tot(A).
Then we have a Gm-equivariant Koszul matrix factorization {α, β} of −Z ∗W on tot(A),
supported at the zero section (see Sec. 2.5). We can use this matrix factorization and the
diagram
tot(A)
Z
p
✛
An
✲
X
to define a Fourier-Mukai type functor
Φ : DMFGm(An, W ) → Db(X) : E 7→ p∗(Z ∗E ⊗ {α, β})
(1.5)
(more precisely, this is the functor ΦP for P = {α, β} defined in Sec. 2.6 below).
This functor has a natural realization on the dg-level which in particular allows to consider
the induced map on the Hochschild homology
φ = Φ∗ : H(W ) → HH∗(X).
The Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg isomorphism together with the Hodge theory give an
identification HH∗(X) ≃ H ∗(X, C) (see Sec. 2.2).
Theorem 1.2.1. In the above situation assume in addition that the homogeneous polynomial
fW given by (1.3) still has an isolated singularity. Then for any x ∈ H(W ) one has
Td(A)−1 Td(B)φ(x) ∈ H D(X, C) ⊂ H ∗(X, C),
where Td(·) denotes the Todd class, and
D = 2 rk B − 2 rk A + n.
(1.6)
4
1.3 Outline of the proof
The proof combines some ideas of noncommutative Hodge theory, the relation between
graded matrix factorizations and derived categories of coherent sheaves on hypersurfaces
(Orlov's equivalence), and a purity result from [33].
We start by rewriting the assertion using the left adjoint map to φ with respect to the
canonical pairings on the Hochschild homology. Recall that for a smooth and proper dg
category C the Hochschild homology is equipped with a canonical nondegenerate pairing
h·, ·iC, such that the maps on Hochschild homology induced by an adjoint pair of functors
are adjoint with respect to the canonical pairings (see Sections 2.3 and 2.4 for details). Thus,
the left adjoint map to φ is given by
ψ = Ψ∗ : H ∗(X) ≃ HH∗(X) → H(W ),
where Ψ : Db(X) → DMFGm(W ) is the left adjoint functor to Φ. Thus, we can rewrite the
condition α · φ(H(W )) ⊂ H D(X), where α = Td(A)−1 Td(B), as
ψ(⊥(α−1H D(X))) = 0.
Under the Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg isomorphism HH∗(X) ≃ H ∗(X) the canonical
pairing takes the form
h·, ·iDb(X) =ZX
κ(a) · b · TdX,
where a, b ∈ H ∗(X), κ is the linear operator on H ∗(X), such that κ(c) = (−1)qc for c ∈ H p,q
(see Section 2.3). This implies that the left orthogonal to α−1H D(X) ⊂ H ∗(X) with respect
to the canonical pairing is
⊥(α−1H D(X)) = Mj6=2 dim X−D
κ(α · Td−1
X )H j(X),
so we need to check that for each y ∈ H j(X), where j 6= 2 dim X − D, one has
ψ(cid:0)κ(α · Td−1
X ) · y(cid:1) = 0.
(1.7)
Next, we recall that the Hochschild homology of the category of matrix factorizations
has a canonical decomposition (see [36, Thm. 2.6.1])
H(W ) = HH∗(MFGm(W )) ≃ Mγ∈µd
H(Wγ)µd,
(1.8)
where Wγ = W (An)γ , and H(W ) is given by (1.1). In fact, (1.8) is exactly the decomposition
of HH∗(MFGm(W )) into isotypical components with respect to the natural action of Z/d on it
(see [36, Thm. 2.6.1(ii)]). Let Π : H(W ) → H(W ) denote the projector onto the summand
H(W )µd, corresponding to γ = 1. Using the characterization of this summand as Z/d-
invariants in H(W ) we check that φ = φΠ (see Lemma 2.6.3), and hence the image of ψ is
contained in H(W )µd ⊂ H(W ).
5
Now the idea is that H(W )µd should be thought of as an analog of the primitive middle
cohomology. Recall that if X ⊂ PN is a smooth projective variety of dimension n then the
primitive part of the middle cohomology P n(X) ⊂ H n(X) is defined as the kernel of the
operator of multiplication with c1(H), where H is the hyperplane class on X. The classical
Hodge-Riemann relations imply (see Lemma 2.3.1) that for a nonzero class a ∈ P n
H(X) one
has
n(n+1)
2
(−1)
ha, aiDb(X) > 0,
where a 7→ a is the complex conjugation associated with the real structure on H ∗(X).
The key step of the proof is establishing an analog of this property for the canonical
pairing on H(W )µd ⊂ H(W ). One missing piece of structure that we need for this is a real
structure on H(W ). In fact, in general one expects to have a natural rational lattice in the
Hochschild homology of any smooth proper dg-category (see [19], [4]).
In the case of an
admissible subcategory C of Db(Y ) such a rational lattice can be constructed easily using
the realization of its Hochschild homology as an image of a rational projector on H ∗(Y ) (see
Section 3.1). Furthermore, the obtained rational lattices are compatible with the maps on
Hochschild homology induced by functors of Fourier-Mukai type.
Using the natural embedding H(W )µd ⊂ H(fW )µd, where fW is given by (1.3) we reduce
the situation to the homogeneous case (where deg(xi) = 1). For homogeneous W , we apply
Orlov's result, connecting the category of matrix factorizations DMFGm(W ) with the derived
category of the corresponding projective hypersurface X = (W = 0), to realize DMFGm(W )
as such an admissible subcategory (see Lemma 3.2.1). Then using explicit descriptions of
the canonical pairing h·, ·iW on H(W ) and of the Chern characters of matrix factorizations
in [34], we prove the following property of the subspace H(W )µd ⊂ H(W ), which makes it
an analogue of the primitive cohomology: H(W )µd is orthogonal to the Chern characters
of the matrix factorizations k(m)st, for m ∈ Z. Here k(m)st is the stabilization of the
trivial module k, with the grading shifted by m. This is used in proving the analog of the
Hodge-Riemann relations for matrix factorizations (see Proposition 3.2.4), which states that
for a nonzero class x ∈ H(W )µd ∩ Hj(W ) one has hx, xiW 6= 0 (and in fact, hx, xiW is a
positive multiple of a certain power of i). Roughly speaking, this is proved by reducing to
the classical Hodge-Riemann relations for cohomology classes on the projective hypersurface
X, using Orlov's theorem relating the categories DMFGm(W ) and Db(X). For example, in
the case d = n Orlov's theorem states an equivalence of these categories, and we check that
H(W )µd corresponds precisely to the primitive cohomology of X under the corresponding
isomorphism between the Hochschild homology (see Remark 3.2.5).
Since the image of ψ is contained in H(W )µd, the above Hodge-Riemann relations show
that the vanishing (1.7) is equivalent to the vanishing
hψ(y′), ψ(y′)iW = 0,
where y′ = κ(α · Td−1
φ and ψ we rewrite this as a certain purity property for the composition φψ = (Φ ◦ Ψ)∗.
X ) · y and y ∈ H p,q with p + q 6= 2 dim X − D. Using the adjointness of
Finally, a computation with the Fourier-Mukai kernels (see Sections 2.6 and 4.1) shows
that the kernel K on X × X defining the functor Φ ◦ Ψ : Db(X) → Db(X) is given by the
push-forward of a Koszul matrix factorization of zero on some vector bundle over X × X,
6
supported along the zero section. Applying the results of [33] (see Prop. 4.1.1) we obtain
that the appropriate twist of the class ch(K) is pure of certain dimension (see (4.1)). This
gives the required purity property for φψ and so finishes the proof.
We conjecture that a statement similar to Theorem 1.2.1 holds for any quasihomogeneous
W with an isolated singularity. One could try to mimic our proof in the homogeneous
case. However, at present several technical ingredients are lacking. For example, in this
case the analog of the projective hypersurface is a DM-stack, so we need to identify the
canonical bilinear form on the Hochschild homology of a smooth proper DM-stack in terms
of the Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg isomorphism. Another problem is matching the effect
of Orlov's equivalence on the Hochschild homology with the ad hoc isomorphism constructed
in [11].
The paper is organized as follows.
In Section 2 we build the background and prove
some technical statements. The most important bits are Section 2.6, where we establish
an adjunction result for Fourier-Mukai type functors involving matrix factorizations, and
Section 2.7 containing some calculations with Orlov's equivalence. Then in Section 3 we
discuss rational lattices and prove the analog of the Hodge-Riemann bilinear relations for the
Hochschild homology of the category of matrix factorizations of a homogeneous polynomial
with an isolated singularity (or a quasihomogeneous polynomial as in Theorem 1.2.1; see
Proposition 3.2.4). Finally, in Section 4 we recall the purity result from [33] and show
how Theorem 1.2.1 is deduced from it. We then deduce Theorem 1.1.1 in Section 4.3.
In the Appendix we prove a technical result involving Grothendieck duality and matrix
factorizations, which is needed in Section 2.6.
Conventions. We work with schemes and dg-categories over a field k. Starting from Section 3
we assume that k = C. For a smooth projective variety X we denote by Db(X) the bounded
derived category of coherent sheaves on X, which we equip with one of the standard dg-
enhancements. We denote by Per(X) ⊂ Db(X) the full subcategory of perfect complexes.
For an algebraic group G acting on X we denote by PerG(X) the category of G-equivariant
perfect complexes. For a morphism of schemes f we denote by f ∗ and f∗ the corresponding
derived functors of pull-back and push-forward. For an additive category C we denote by C
its Caroubian completion. By ch(·) and Td(·) we denote the characteristic classes of algebraic
vector bundles constructed using the Atiyah class, as in [1] (their components differ from
the corresponding topological characteristic classes by factors of (−2πi)).
Acknowledgments. I would like to thank Alessandro Chiodo and Dimitri Zvonkine for orga-
nizing the workshop "Mirror symmetry and spin curves" which prompted me to write this
paper. I am grateful to Nick Rosenblyum for a useful discussion on adjoint functors. I am
also grateful to the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute at Berkeley, where some of
this work was done, for the hospitality and excellent working conditions. Finally, I thank
the anonimous referee for useful suggestions. This research is supported in part by the NSF
grant DMS-1400390.
7
2 Preliminaries
2.1 DG-categories and dg-functors
Let k be a field. For a dg-category C over k we denote by D(C) the derived category of
right C-modules and by Per(C) ⊂ D(C) the subcategory of perfect modules. We denote by
Perdg(C) the natural dg-enhancement of Per(C) (defined using cofibrant right C-modules, see
[41, Sec. 7]).
Throughout this paper we consider only C such that Perdg(C) is saturated (see [42, Sec.
2.2]).
For an object K ∈ Per(Cop ⊗ D) we have a dg-functor of tensoring with K,
ΦK : Perdg(C) → Perdg(D) : M 7→ M ⊗L
C K.
It is known that in this way we get a bijection between isomorphism classes in Per(Cop ⊗ D)
and morphisms between Perdg(C) and Perdg(D) in the localized category Hqe of dg-categories,
obtained by inverting quasi-equivalences (see [41]). To a usual dg-functor Φ : C → D we
associate a bimodule, i.e., an object in D(Cop ⊗ D),
(C, D) 7→ HomD(D, Φ(C)),
which is perfect under our assumptions on C and D. The corresponding tensor functor
Perdg(C) → Perdg(D) is an extension of Φ.
In the remainder of the paper we often switch between K and ΦK, and sometimes,
denote them by the same letter. We denote by ∆C ∈ Per(Cop ⊗ C) the diagonal bimodule
corresponding to the identity functor. We also have the corresponding dg-functor
Trdg
C : Perdg(Cop ⊗ C) → Perdg(k)
(2.1)
mapping A∨ ⊗ B to HomC(A, B).
For a pair of kernels K1 ∈ Per(Cop
1 ⊗ D1), K2 ∈ Per(Cop
2 ⊗ D2) we have the induced functor
K1(cid:3)K2 : Perdg(C1 ⊗ C2) → Perdg(D1 ⊗ D2),
given by the external tensor product of the kernels K1 and K2. Recall that there is a natural
equivalence
Per(C)op ∼✲ Per(Cop) : M 7→ M ∨
(see e.g., [39, (3.6)]). Using this equivalence, for a kernel F ∈ Per(Cop ⊗ D) we can define
F op ∈ Per(C ⊗ Dop) as the kernel corresponding to the functor
Per(Cop)
∼✲ Per(C)op
F✲ Per(D)op ∼✲ Per(Dop).
Definition 2.1.1. Let F ∈ Per(Cop ⊗ D), G ∈ Per(Dop ⊗ C). We say that (F, G) is an adjoint
pair, or that F is left adjoint to G if a morphism
ϕ : ∆C → G ◦ F
8
is given in D(Cop ⊗ C), such that for any C ∈ Per(C) and D ∈ Per(D) the induced morphism
HomD(F (C), D)
G✲ HomC(GF (C), G(D))
?◦ϕ✲ HomC(C, G(D))
(2.2)
is a quasi-isomorphism.
Note that if (F, G) is an adjoint pair then the map (2.2) can be extended to a similar
map of dg-functors Perdg(Cop ⊗ D) → Perdg(k),
TrD ◦(F op(cid:3)∆D) → TrC ◦(IdC (cid:3)G),
(2.3)
induced by a quasi-isomorphism of kernels in Per(C ⊗ Dop).
Indeed, the fact that (2.3)
is a quasi-isomorphism of kernels is equivalent to the assertion that it becomes a quasi-
isomorphism of complexes when applied to C ∨ ⊗ D ∈ Cop ⊗ D, which corresponds to (2.2)
being a quasi-isomorphism.
Recall that a Z/2-dg-category is a dg-category in which all Hom-complexes are 2-periodic.
Equivalently, we can replace the 2-periodic complexes by the corresponding Z/2-graded
complexes. The theory of Z/2-dg-categories is parallel to the theory of dg-categories (see
[14, Sec. 4.1]). With each dg-category C we can associate its Z/2-folding C(2), which is a
Z/2-dg-category such that
Hom0
C(2)(A, B) =Mi∈Z
Hom2i
C (A, B), Hom1
C(2)(A, B) =Mi∈Z
Hom2i+1
C
(A, B).
One can think of this operation as the tensor product with the algebra k[u, u−1], where
deg(u) = 2. It is easy to see that the Hochschild homology functor commutes with passing
to the Z/2-folding, i.e., the Hochschild homology of C(2) as a Z/2-dg-category is the Z/2-
folding of the complex HH∗(C), and these identifications are compatible with the maps
induced by functors. In particular, taking the Chern character and the canonical pairing on
the Hochschild homology discussed below are also compatible with this operation.
2.2 Chern character in Hochschild homology versus topological
Chern character
Recall that for any dg-category C over k and an object E of C one has the Chern character
ch(E) ∈ HH0(C) defined by the functoriality of the Hochschild homology (see e.g., [39],
[34]).
In the case when C = Db(X), the dg-version of the bounded derived category of coherent
sheaves on a smooth projective variety X over C, we have the Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg
isomorphism
HH∗(Db(X)) = HH∗(X) ≃ ⊕p,qH q(X, Ωp)
(2.4)
so that HHi corresponds to the sum of terms with p − q = i. Hence, by Hodge theory, we
can identify the Hochschild homology HH∗(X) with H ∗(X, C).
As was shown in [6], under this identification, the abstract Chern character with values in
HH∗(X) is essentially the same as the topological Chern character with values in H ∗(X, C)
(for k = C). Here is a more precise statement.
9
Proposition 2.2.1. Let k = C. For E ∈ Db(X) let chtop(E) ∈ H ∗(X, C) denote the usual
topological Chern character. Then one has
chk(E) = (−2πi)k chtop
k (E).
Proof. Caldararu computes ch(E) in terms of traces of powers of the Atiyah class At(E) ∈
Ext1(E, E ⊗ Ω1) (see the proof of [6, Thm. 4.5]). Thus, the assertion follows from the
comparison with the topological Chern character in [1, Sec. 5].1
In what follows we always use the notation ch(·) for the abstract Chern character defined
using Hochschild functoriality (or in terms of the Atiyah class, in the case of Db(X)). We
denote by Td(·) the Todd class defined by the standard formulas in terms of the components
of ch(·) (we only use it for Db(X)).
2.3 Canonical pairing on the Hochschild homology
Applying the functoriality of the Hochschild homology to the functor (2.1) and using the
Kunneth isomorphism for Hochschild homology we obtain a canonical pairing
h·, ·iC : HH∗(Cop) ⊗ HH∗(C) → k
(2.5)
(cf. [39, Sec. 1.2]).
Note that there is a canonical isomorphism HH∗(Cop) ≃ HH∗(C), so we can think of
the canonical pairing as a pairing on HH∗(C). However, one should be careful that in the
case when the category C is equipped with the duality Cop ≃ C the induced identification of
HH∗(Cop) ≃ HH∗(C) may be different from the canonical one. For example this is the case
for C = Db(X), where it is customary to use the duality on sheaves to identify C with Cop.
This is related to the involution a 7→ κ(a) on the Hochschild homology of X arising below
(cf. [32, Rem. 2.15]).
In the case of C = Db(X) (where X is a smooth projective variety) the canonical pairing
on HH∗(Db(X)) is given in terms of the HKR-isomorphism (2.4) by the formula
where
ha, biDb(X) = (κ(a), b)X ,
(a, b)X :=ZX
a · b · TdX,
κ(c) = (−1)qc for c ∈ H p,q = H q(X, Ωp)
(2.6)
(2.7)
(2.8)
(see [37, Eq. (8)]; note that Ramadoss in [37] works with the Mukai pairing which coincides
with the canonical pairing (2.5) for C = Db(X), e.g., by [32, Prop. 2.14]). HereRX is defined
as the projection
ZX
: ⊕p,qH q(X, Ωp) → H n(X, Ωn
X) ≃ k,
1The factor (−2πi)k appears due to the standard normalization of chtop(E), so that it takes values in
H ∗(X, Z). Caldararu uses a different normalization, so he does not have this factor.
10
where n = dim X. In the case k = C it is related to the topological operation of integration
over the fundamental cycle of X by the formula
ZX
ω =
1
(2πi)n Z top
[X]
ω
(see e.g., [13]).
The classical Hodge-Riemann bilinear relations (see e.g., [43, Ch. V]) imply the following
property of the canonical pairing h·, ·iDb(X).
H(X) ⊂ H n(X) be the cor-
Lemma 2.3.1. Let H ∈ Pic(X) be an ample class, and let P n
responding primitive part of the middle cohomology consisting of the classes a such that
a · c1(H) = 0. Then for a nonzero class a ∈ P n
H(X) one has
(−1)
n(n+1)
2
ha, aiDb(X) > 0.
Proof. By (2.6), we have
ha, aiDb(X) = (−1)qZX
a · a · TdX =
(−1)q
(2πi)n Z top
[X]
a · a · TdX ,
where a ∈ H p,q, p + q = n. Since in our case a · a ∈ H n,n(X), we can delete TdX , and the
result follows from the Hodge-Riemann bilinear relations stating that
(−1)
n(n−1)
2
ip−qZ top
[X]
a · a > 0.
2.4 Maps on Hochschild homology induced by Fourier-Mukai func-
tors
We need the fact that adjoint functors induce adjoint operators on Hochschild homology
with respect to the canonical pairings (2.5) (cf. [8, Thm. 8] in the case of derived categories
of sheaves).
Lemma 2.4.1. If (F ∈ Per(Cop ⊗ D), G ∈ Per(Dop ⊗ C)) is an adjoint pair of kernels then
hF∗(x), yiD = hx, G∗(y)iC,
where x ∈ HH∗(C), y ∈ HH∗(D), and F∗ : HH∗(C) → HH∗(D), G∗ : HH∗(D) → HH∗(C)
are the induced maps on the Hochschild homology.
Proof. The required equality is immediately obtained from (2.3) by passing to the induced
maps on Hochschild homology. We have to use the fact that the map
F op
∗
: HH∗(Cop) → HH∗(Dop)
11
coincides with F∗ under the natural identifications HH∗(C) ≃ HH∗(Cop), HH∗(D) ≃ HH∗(Dop).
The simplest way to check this is to use the definition of the maps F∗ via the Hochschild
chain complexes.
We will use the following formula for the maps induced on the Hochschild homology by
Fourier-Mukai type functors, in terms of the Chern character of the kernel and the pairing
(2.7).
Lemma 2.4.2. For the Fourier-Mukai functor F : Db(X) → Db(Y ) associated with a kernel
K ∈ Db(X × Y ) the induced map on the Hochschild homology gets identified via the HKR-
isomorphisms with
F∗ : H ∗(X, C) → H ∗(Y, C) : a 7→ tr12(a ⊗ ch(K)),
where
tr12 : H ∗(X) ⊗ H ∗(X) ⊗ H ∗(Y ) → H ∗(Y ) : a ⊗ b ⊗ c 7→ (a, b)X c.
Proof. This is equivalent to [26, Thm. 1.2].
2.5 Matrix factorizations
In this section we recall some basic results about matrix factorizations and also prove several
technical statements that will be needed later in working with Fourier-Mukai transforms
involving matrix factorizations. The key result that allows to deduce many results for matrix
factorizations from the classical results about coherent sheaves is the equivalence with the
singularity category of the hypersurface W = 0 (see (2.9) below).
Let X be a Gm-scheme, i.e., a scheme with a Gm-action. Throughout this paper we
make an assumption that our Gm-schemes admit a Gm-equivariant ample line bundle. This
implies that they admit a Gm-invariant open affine cover and have a resolution property, i.e.,
every Gm-equivariant coherent sheaf on X admits a surjection from a Gm-equivariant vector
bundle (see [40]).
For a Gm-equivariant quasicoherent sheaf F on X we denote by F{i} the same sheaf with
the Gm-action twisted by the character λ 7→ λi of Gm.
Let W be a function on X of weight d > 0 with respect to the Gm-action, i.e., W ∈
H 0(X, OX {d})Gm. A Gm-equivariant matrix factorization of W is a Z/2-graded vector bundle
E = E0 ⊕ E1 on X together with maps
δ1 : E1 → E0, δ0 : E0 → E1{d},
such that δ0δ1 = W · id and δ1δ0 = W · id. For a pair of Gm-equivariant matrix factorizations
of W , E and F we consider the complex of Gm-equivariant sheaves Hom(E, F ) given by
Hom2n(E, F ) = Hom(E0, F0{dn}) ⊕ Hom(E1, F1{dn}),
Hom2n+1(E, F ) = Hom(E0, F1{d(n + 1)}) ⊕ Hom(E1, F0{dn}),
12
with the differential f 7→ δF ◦ f − (−1)f f ◦ δE. Let
RΓ(X, ·) : Com(QcohGm(X)) → Com(k[Gm])
be a multiplicative dg-model of the push-forward to the point, given e.g., by the Cech
complex with respect to a Gm-invariant open affine cover (as in [38, Sec. 2]). We define the
dg-category MFGm(X, W ) of Gm-equivariant matrix factorizations of W by setting
Hom(E, F ) = RΓ(X, Hom(E, F ))Gm.
Passing to the 0th cohomology of the dg-category MFGm(X, W ) we get the derived category
of matrix factorizations DMFGm(X, W ).
Assume that X is smooth. Recall that by our assumption X admits a Gm-equivariant
ample line bundle, hence it has a Gm-resolution property. Assume also that W is not a
zero divisor. Then the functor associating with a matrix factorization E the cokernel of
δ1 : E1 → E0 extends to an equivalence
DMFGm(X, W )
∼✲ DSg,Gm(X0),
(2.9)
where X0 ⊂ X is the hypersurface W = 0, DSg,Gm(X0) is the singularity category, defined as
the quotient of the bounded Gm-equivariant derived category by the subcategory PerGm(X0)
of perfect complexes.
In this form the equivalence follows from [35, Thm. 3.14] but the
construction and the main ideas go back to Orlov [28] (see also [29, Sec. 3], [30] and [15]).
Note that there is a different way to define the derived category of matrix factorizations
as the absolute derived category Dabs(MFGm(X, W )), which is the quotient of the naive
homotopy category by the convolutions of exact sequences of matrix factorizations (see [30],
[15]). The equivalence of this definition with the one above (in the case of smooth X) follows
from the equivalence
Dabs
Gm(X, W ) ≃ DSg,Gm(X0)
(which can be proved as in [30], [15]). In the case when X is affine (and smooth) the derived
category of matrix factorization on X coincides with the naive homotopy category (see e.g.,
[29, Sec. 3], [35, Prop. 3.19]).
For technical reasons we often work with the Caroubian completion DMFGm(X, W ) of
the derived category of matrix factorizations. It can be realized as a full subcategory in the
derived category of matrix factorizations of quasicoherent sheaves (see [35, Sec. 4], [15, Sec.
2.3]). In the case when W is a homogeneous polynomial on An with an isolated singularity the
relation of DMFGm(An, W ) with the derived category Db(Y ) on the corresponding projective
hypersurface Y (see Sec. 2.7) implies that DMFGm(An, W ) is in fact Caroubian closed.
We have a natural duality equivalence
D : MFGm(X, W )op → MFGm(X, −W ),
where D(E)0 = E∨
1 {−d} with the induced differential (see [34, Eq. (2.13)]).
Often, we will simply write E∨ instead of D(E). Similarly to the Z/2-graded case (see [25,
Lem. 3.9]) this duality can be interpreted in terms of the singularity category.
0 , D(E)1 = E∨
13
Lemma 2.5.1. Assume that X is smooth and W is not a zero divisor. Under the equivalences
of DMFGm(X, W ) and DMFGm(X, −W ) with Db
Sg,Gm(X0), the duality D corresponds to the
duality F 7→ RHom(F, OX0[−1]).
Proof. Recall that for a matrix factorization E the corresponding object of the singularity
category is represented by the coherent sheaf F on X0 fitting into the exact sequence
where i : X0 → X is the embedding. By duality, we have an exact triangle
0 → E1 → E0 → i∗F → 0,
E∨
0 → E∨
1 → RHom(i∗F, OX)[1] → . . .
By Grothendieck duality,
RHom(i∗F, OX)[1] ≃ i∗RHom(F, i!OX )[1] ≃ i∗RHom(F, OX0).
Thus, G = RHom(F, OX0) is a sheaf on X0, and we have an exact sequence
0 → E∨
0 → E∨
1 → i∗G → 0.
On the other hand, the object of the singularity category associated with D(E) is the coherent
sheaf F ′ on X0 from the exact sequence
0 → E∨
1 {−d} → E∨
0 → i∗F ′ → 0.
Hence, we have an exact sequence on X0
which shows that F ′ ≃ G[−1] in the singularity category.
0 → F ′ → i∗E∨
1 → G → 0
For a pair of potentials W, W ′ on X, both of weight d > 0, we define the tensor product
functor
by setting
⊗ : MFGm(X, W ) × MFGm(X, W ′) → MFGm(X, W + W ′)
(E ⊗ F )0 = E0 ⊗ F0 ⊕ E1 ⊗ F1{d} and (E ⊗ F )0 = E0 ⊗ F1 ⊕ E1 ⊗ F0
(2.10)
with the differential δE ⊗ idF + idE ⊗δF .
For F ∈ MFGm(X, W ) we can consider the infinite complex of Gm-equivariant sheaves
on X0 = W −1(0),
com(F ) : . . . → E0{−d}X0 → E1X0 → E0X0 → E1{d}X0 → . . .
with E0X0 placed in degree 0. Note that if W = 0 then this is a complex on X = X0. The
following relation between Hom's, duality and tensor product is straightforward to check (cf.
[36, Lem. 1.1.6]).
14
Lemma 2.5.2. For E, F ∈ MFGm(X, W ) one has an isomorphism of Gm-equivariant com-
plexes on X,
Hom(E, F ) ≃ com(E∨ ⊗ F ).
Hence,
Hom(E, F ) ≃ RΓ(X, com(E∨ ⊗ F ))Gm.
For a Gm-scheme X and for some d > 0 we can consider the category MFGm,d(X, 0) of
matrix factorizations of 0 on X, where 0 is viewed as a function of weight d. In this situation
we define the functor
mf : PerGm(X) → DMFGm,d(X, 0) : mf(C •)0 =Mn
C 2n{−nd}, mf(C •)1 =Mn
C 2n−1{−nd}
(2.11)
(note that since we have a resolution property for Gm-equivariant sheaves on X, an object
of PerGm(X) can be represented globally by a bounded complex of Gm-equivariant vector
bundles, see [35, Lem. 3.5]). If W is a function on X of weight d then we also get the tensor
product operation
⊗ : PerGm(X) × DMFGm(X, W ) → DMFGm(X, W ), F ⊗ E := mf(F ) ⊗ E.
Then one has a natural isomorphism of complexes on X0,
com(F ⊗ E) ≃ F X0 ⊗ com(E)
(2.12)
(see [36, Lem. 1.1.5]). This easily implies (assuming W is not a zero divisor) that under the
equivalence (2.9) the operation F ⊗? corresponds to the operation F X0⊗? on the singularity
category DSg,Gm(X0).
Assume now in addition that the action of Gm on X is trivial and X is quasiprojective.
Then we can define several complexes associated with a Gm-equivariant matrix factorization
of 0 on X. Note that for any Gm-equivariant matrix factorization E of 0 we can write
E0 = L E0,i, E1 = L E1,i, where Gm acts on E•,i through the character λ 7→ λ−i, i.e.,
E•,i = (E•{i})Gm. Then we have the functor
com0 : DMFGm,d(X, 0) → Per(X),
where com0(E) is the complex
. . . → E1,0 → E0,0 → E1,d → . . .
with E0,0 placed in degree 0. Note that E0,i and E1,i are nonzero only for finitely many i, so
the complex com0(E) is bounded. Let us also consider the functor
com : DMFGm,d(X, 0) → Per(X), com(E) =
d−1Mi=0
com0(E{i}).
(2.13)
15
Proposition 2.5.3. Let X be a scheme equipped with the trivial Gm-action.
(i) For E ∈ DMFGm,d(X, 0) one has a natural isomorphism of complexes
com0(E) ≃ com(E)Gm.
(ii) The functor mf is left adjoint to com0.
(iii) The left adjoint to the functor com is F 7→Ld−1
i=0 mf(F ){−i}.
(iv) For F ∈ Per(X) and E ∈ DMFGm,d(X, 0) one has a natural isomorphism of complexes
where on the left we equip F with the trivial Gm-action.
com(F ⊗ E) ≃ F ⊗ com(E),
Proof. (i) This follows immediately from the definitions.
(ii) For a complex C • ∈ Per(X) and a matrix factorization F let us compute the complex
Hom(mf(C •), F )Gm. We have
Hom2n(mf(C •), F )Gm = Hom(Mi
Yi
Hom(C 2i, F0,d(i+n)) ⊕Yi
C 2i{−id}, F0{dn})Gm ⊕ Hom(Mn
Hom(C 2i−1F1,d(i+n)) =Yj
Hom(C j, com0(F )j+2n).
C 2i−1{−id}, F1{dn})Gm =
Similarly
Hom2n+1(mf(C •), F )Gm =Yj
Hom(Cj, com0(F )j+2n+1),
and the differentials match. Passing to RΓ(X, ?) we get the required adjointness.
(iii) This follows easily from (ii).
(iv) This follows from (2.12): first, we check a similar property for com0, and then for
com.
Remark 2.5.4. When the action of Gm on X is trivial, we have an equivalence
DMFGm,d(X, 0) ≃ Perµd(X)
associating to E the complexLd−1
is the composition of this equivalence with the forgetful functor Perµd(X) → Per(X).
i=0 com0(E{i}){−i} (cf. [36, Prop. 1.2.2]). The functor com
Let us now return to the general situation of a Gm-scheme X with a function W of weight
d > 0. For a closed Gm-invariant subset T ⊂ X0 = W −1(0) we denote by DMFGm,T (X, W ) ⊂
DMFGm(X, W ) the full subcategory of matrix factorizations E such that for every closed
point x ∈ X0\T the complex com(E)x is exact. Equivalently, these are matrix factorizations
that become trivial in the category DMFGm(X \ T, W ) (see [35, Lem. 5.4(iii)]).
Let f : X → Y be a Gm-morphism of smooth Gm-varieties, and let W be a function of
weight d > 0 on Y . The push-forward functor f∗ for matrix factorizations is most naturally
16
defined in terms of matrix factorizations of quasicoherent sheaves (see [15, Sec. 3], [2]). If
T ⊂ X is a closed subset, proper over Y , then one has also a natural push-forward functor
f∗ : DMFGm,T (X, f ∗W ) → DMFGm(Y, W )
(see [15, Sec. 3.4], [35, Sec. 6]).
Assume in addition that W and f ∗W are not zero divisors. Let f0 : X0 = f −1(W −1(0)) →
Y0 = W −1(0) be the morphism between the hypersurfaces induced by f . Then the functor
f0∗ : Db(X0) → Db(Y0) induces a functor between the singularity categories, which corre-
sponds to f∗ under the equivalences (2.9) for W and f ∗(W ).
The following property is straightforward.
Lemma 2.5.5. For f : X → Y a Gm-equivariant morphism of smooth Gm-varieties, and
for F , a Gm-equivariant matrix factorization of 0 on X, one has
com(f∗(F )) ≃ f∗ com(F ).
The analog of the Grothendieck duality for matrix factorizations was established under
quite general assumptions in the work of Efimov and Positselski [15, Sec. 3]. Here we will
use the following version for smooth morphisms between smooth varieties.
Proposition 2.5.6. Let f : X → Y be a smooth Gm-equivariant morphism of relative
dimension m between smooth Gm-varieties, and let T ⊂ X be a closed subset, proper over
Y . Let W be a function on Y of weight d > 0 with respect to the Gm-action, which is not a
zero divisor. For E ∈ DMFGm,T (X, f ∗W ) we have a natural functorial isomorphism
in DMFGm(Y, −W ), where
f∗(E∨ ⊗ Df ) ≃ (f∗E)∨
Df := ωf [m].
Proof. Let f0 : X0 → Y0 = W −1(0) be the morphism induced by f , where X0 = f −1(Y0).
Note that under the equivalence (2.9), extended to Caroubian completions, E corresponds
to an object F ∈ DSg(X0) supported at T ∩ X0 (see [35, Prop. 5.6]). Hence, by Lemma 2.5.1,
it suffices to construct an isomorphism
f0∗(RHom(F, OX0) ⊗ Df X0) ≃ RHom(f0∗F, OY0)
in Db(Y0), provided F ∈ Db(X0) has a support proper over Y0. Since Df X0 ≃ Df0, such an
isomorphism is given by the usual Grothendieck duality.
Corollary 2.5.7. In the situation of Proposition 2.5.6, for E ∈ DMFGm,T (X, f ∗W ) and
F ∈ DMFGm(Y, W ) one has
Hom(f∗E, F ) ≃ f∗Hom(E, f +F ), where
f +F = Df ⊗ f ∗F.
Hence, we also have a functorial isomorphism
Hom(f∗E, F ) ≃ Hom(E, f +F ).
17
Proof. Using Lemma 2.5.2, Proposition 2.5.6, and the projection formula we get
Hom(f∗E, F ) ≃ com((f∗E)∨ ⊗ F ) ≃ com(f∗(E∨ ⊗ Df ⊗ f ∗F )).
Using Lemma 2.5.5 we can switch com with f∗, so we obtain
Hom(f∗E, F ) ≃ f∗ com(E∨ ⊗ Df ⊗ f ∗F ) ≃ f∗Hom(E, Df ⊗ f ∗F ),
as claimed. The second isomorphism is obtained from the first by applying RΓ.
Let us recall an important construction of Koszul matrix factorizations, which can be
viewed as a generalization of the Koszul complex. Assume we have a Gm-equivariant vector
bundle V on X and invariant global sections
α ∈ H 0(X, V {d})Gm, β ∈ H 0(X, V ∨)Gm such that hα, βi = W.
Then we define the Koszul matrix factorization {α, β} of W by
{α, β}0 = OX ⊕ ∧2V {d} ⊕ ∧4V {2d} ⊕ . . . ,
{α, β}1 = V ⊕ ∧3V {d} ⊕ ∧5V {2d} ⊕ . . . ,
with the differential given by
where ιβ is the contraction by β. An important fact is that {α, β} is supported on the locus
of common zeros of α and β (see [36, Lem. 1.5.1]).
δα,β = α∧? + ιβ,
(2.14)
2.6 Some functors given by kernels and an adjunction between
them
Suppose we have a diagram of smooth Gm-varieties
Y
f
p
✛
Z
✲
X
(2.15)
where f is a smooth morphism of constant relative dimension, and Gm acts trivially on X.
Assume further that W is a function on Z of weight d > 0 with respect to the Gm-action.
Given a Gm-equivariant matrix factorization P of −f ∗W on Y , with proper support, we can
define functors
eΦP : DMFGm(Z, W ) → DMFGm,d(X, 0), ΦP : DMFGm(Z, W ) → Db(X),
eΨP : DMFGm,d(X, 0) → DMFGm(Z, −W ), ΨP : Db(X) → DMFGm(Z, −W ),
(2.16)
18
as follows:
eΦP (E) = p∗(f ∗E ⊗ P ), ΦP = com ◦eΦP ,
eΨP (F ) = f∗(P ⊗ p∗F ), ΨP (F ) =
d−1Mi=0 eΨP (mf(F ){−i}).
Here f ∗E ⊗ P (resp., P ⊗ p∗F ) is a Gm-equivariant matrix factorization of 0 (resp., −f ∗W )
on Y , that has a proper support, and so we can apply the push-forward functor p∗ (resp.,
f∗) to it. The functors mf and com are given by (2.11) and (2.13).
Lemma 2.6.1. Let
Y ′
g
q
✛
Z
✲
X ′
be another diagram with the same properties as (2.15), and let P ′ be a Gm-equivariant matrix
factorization of g∗W on Y ′ with proper support. Then the composition
DMFGm,d(X ′, 0)
eΨP ′✲ DMFGm(Z, W )
eΦP✲ DMFGm,d(X, 0)
is isomorphic to the Fourier-Mukai type functor associated with the kernel
where we consider the diagram
eK = pX ′X,∗(p∗
1P ′ ⊗ p∗
2P ) ∈ DMFGm,d(X ′ × X, 0),
Y ′ ×Z Y
p 1
p
2
✛
Y ′
✲
Y
q
g
f
p
✛
X ′
✛
✲
Z
✲
X
and denote by pX ′X : Y ′ ×Z Y → X ′ ×X the map induced by q ◦p1 and p◦p2. The composition
ΦP ◦ ΨP ′ : Db(X ′) → Db(X)
is isomorphic to the Fourier-Mukai functor associated with a kernel K ∈ Db(X ′ × X) such
that [K] = d[com(eK)] in K0(X ′ × X).
19
Proof. The first assertion follows easily from the projection formula and the base change
formula (cf. [2, Sec. 5.2]). It remains to compute the composition
ΦP ◦ ΨP ′ : F 7→ com(eΦP ◦ eΨP ′)(
d−1Mi=0
mf(F ){−i}).
Let pX : X ′ × X → X, pX ′ : X ′ × X → X ′ be the projections. We have
where in the last isomorphism we used Proposition 2.5.3(iv). Thus, ΦP ◦ ΨP ′ is associated
with the kernel
X ′F ⊗ eK{−i}) ≃ pX,∗(cid:0)p∗
X ′F ⊗ com(eK{−i})(cid:1),
com(cid:0)pX,∗(p∗
X ′ mf(F ){−i} ⊗ eK)(cid:1) ≃ pX,∗com(p∗
d−1Mi=0
K =
com(eK{−i}).
It is easy to see that com(eK{−i}) and com(eK) are direct sums of almost the same complexes --
some complexes get shifted by even integers. Hence, the assertion about the classes in the
Grothendieck group.
As before, we denote Df = ωf [dim Y − dim Z].
Proposition 2.6.2. In the above situation the left adjoint functor to eΦP (resp., ΦP ) is
eΨQ (resp., ΨQ), where Q = P ∨ ⊗ Df ∈ MFGm(Y, f ∗W ). Furthermore, the corresponding
dg-functors are adjoint in the sense of Definition 2.1.1.
Proof. For E ∈ MFGm,d(X, 0) and F ∈ MFGm(Z, W ), we have a chain of quasi-isomorphisms
Hom(E,eΦP (F )) ≃ Hom(E, p∗(P ⊗ f ∗F )) ≃
Hom(p∗E, P ⊗ f ∗F ) ≃ Hom(p∗E ⊗ P ∨ ⊗ Df , f ∗F ⊗ Df ).
Note that p∗E ⊗ P ∨ ⊗ Df has proper support. Hence, using Corollary 2.5.7 we can rewrite
this as
Hom(f∗(p∗E ⊗ P ∨ ⊗ Df ), F ) ≃ Hom(eΨQ(E), F ).
To show the required adjunction at the dg-level we have to prove that the above isomorphism
is induced by a map Id → eΦP ◦ eΨQ given by a map of kernels. By Lemma 2.6.1, the
composition eΦP ◦ eΨQ is the functor given by the kernel
1Q ⊗ p∗
2P ) ∈ MFGm,d(X ′ × X, 0),
pXX,∗(p∗
where p1 and p2 are the two projections Y ×Z Y → Y , and
pXX : Y ×Z Y → X × X
is the map with the components (pp1, pp2). Thus, we need a map of kernels
∆∗OX → pXX,∗(p∗
1Q ⊗ p∗
2P ).
20
The construction of this map and the verification that the corresponding natural transfor-
mation IdMFGm,d(X,0) → eΦP ◦ eΨQ induces the same quasi-isomorphism
Hom(eΨQ(E), F )
∼✲ Hom(E,eΦP (F ))
as the one obtained above are done in the Appendix (see (5.8) and Proposition 5.0.3).
The adjunction of the pair (ΨQ, ΦP ) follows from the adjunction of the pair (eΨQ,eΦP )
using Proposition 2.5.3(iii).
Now assume that in the above situation we have Z = An and W is a quasihomoge-
neous polynomial on Z of degree d > 0 with an isolated singularity. Recall that we have a
decomposition
HH∗(MFGm(W )) = H(W ) = Mγ∈µd
H(Wγ)µd,
(2.17)
where Wγ = W (An)γ (see [36, Thm. 2.6.1]). In fact, this decomposition is exactly the µd-
grading associated with the natural Z/d-action on HH∗(MFGm(W )) induced by the functors
E 7→ E{i} (see [36, Thm. 2.6.1(ii)]). Let Π denote the projector of H(W ) onto the summand
H(W )µd, corresponding to γ = 1.
Lemma 2.6.3. Let φP : H(W ) → HH∗(X) = H ∗(X, C) be the map induced on Hochschild
homology by the functor ΦP given by (2.16). We have φP = φP ◦ Π.
Proof.
characters of Gm. Hence, ΦP (F ) ≃ ΦP (F {i}). It follows that the map φP is Z/d-invariant,
which is equivalent to the equality in question.
It is clear from the definition that the functor eΦP commutes with tensoring by
2.7 Orlov's equivalence
Now let W (x1, . . . , xn) be a homogeneous polynomial of degree d > 0 (so deg(xi) = 1) with
an isolated singularity. Let us recall Orlov's construction in [29, Sec. 2.1, 2.2] relating the
category of Gm-equivariant matrix factorizations of W with the derived category of coherent
sheaves on the smooth projective hypersurface Y ⊂ Pn−1 given by the equation W = 0.
The construction proceeds in several steps. First, consider the graded algebra
A = k[x1, . . . , xn]/(W ).
Note that the algebra A is Gorenstein with the Gorenstein parameter a = n − d, i.e.,
Ext∗
A(k, A) is concentrated in internal degree a (and in cohomological degree n − 1). We
denote by gr −A the category of finitely generated graded A-modules, and by gr −A≥i the
full subcategory of modules M with Mj = 0 for j < i.
We have Serre's description of coherent sheaves on Y = Proj(A) as the quotient
qgr A = gr −A/ tors −A
21
of gr −A by the subcategory of torsion modules. Thus, we have an equivalence
Db(Y ) ≃ Db(qgr A).
Note that under this equivalence the sheaf OY (i) corresponds to A(i) ∈ qgr A.
Next, for each i ∈ Z we have a fully faithful functor
Rωi : Db(qgr A) → Db(gr −A≥i) ⊂ Db(gr −A),
which is right adjoint to the natural projection πi : Db(gr −A≥i) → Db(qgr A). The image
of Rωi is denoted by Di. The natural projection
π : Db(gr −A) → Db(qgr A) ≃ Db(Y )
induces an equivalence Di ≃ Db(Y ).
Recall that a full triangulated subcategory T′ of a triangulated category T is called left
(resp., right) admissible if the inclusion functor T′ → T has a left (resp., right) adjoint functor
T → T′. A subcategory is admissible if it is left and right admissible. A semiorthogonal
decomposition
T = hA1, . . . , Ari
(2.18)
is given by a collection of full triangulated subcategories (Ai) such that there exists an
increasing filtration 0 = T0 ⊂ T1 ⊂ . . . ⊂ Tr = T by left admissible subcategories such that
Ai is the left orthogonal of Ti−1 in Ti. In particular, HomT(Aj, Ai) = 0 for j > i and (Ai)
generate T as a triangulated category. Note that if in addition T = Db(X), where X is a
smooth projective variety, then each Ai is an admissible subcategory in T (see [5]). When
one of the subcategories Ai is generated by an exceptional object Ai then we write simply
Ai instead of Ai in the right-hand side of (2.18).
Let P≥i (resp., S<i) denote the triangulated subcategory of Db(gr −A) generated by A(e)
with e ≤ −i (resp., by k(e) with e > i). Then we have semiorthogonal decompositions
Db(gr −A) = hS<i, Db(gr −A≥i)i,
Db(gr −A≥i) = hP≥i, Tii,
where Ti is equivalent via the natural projection from Db(gr −A≥i) to the graded singularity
category of A, which in turn is equivalent to the homotopy category of graded matrix factor-
izations (by [29, Thm. 3.10]). Combining these two decompositions we get a semiorthogonal
decomposition
On the other hand, there is a semiorthogonal decomposition
Db(gr −A) = hS<i, P≥i, Tii.
Db(gr −A) = hP≥i+a, S<i, Dii,
where a = n − d.
(2.19)
(2.20)
22
For a = 0 the above decompositions for i = 0 imply that D0 = T0, and hence we get an
equivalence relating matrix factorizations and coherent sheaves on Y :
DMFGm(W ) ≃ T0 = D0 ≃ Db(Y ).
More generally, for a ≥ 0 we can use the semiorthogonal decomposition
P≥i = hP≥i+a, A(−i − a + 1), . . . , A(−i − 1), A(−i)i
to refine the decomposition (2.19) to
Db(gr −A) = hS<i, P≥i+a, A(−i − a + 1), . . . , A(−i − 1), A(−i), Tii.
Comparing this with (2.20) we get a semiorthogonal decomposition
Di = hA(−i − a + 1), . . . , A(−i − 1), A(−i), Tii.
(2.21)
Thus, in this case the category Db(Y ) contains DMFGm(W ) as an admissible subcategory.
Let
ρ : Db(Y ) ≃ D0 → T0 ≃ DMFGm(W )
(2.22)
be the right adjoint functor to the embedding T0 ⊂ D0.
In the case a ≤ 0, using the decomposition
S<−a = hS<0, k, k(−1), . . . , k(a + 1)i,
we refine the decomposition (2.20) for i = −a to
Db(gr −A) = hP≥0, S<0, k, k(−1), . . . , k(a + 1), D−ai.
Comparing this with (2.19) for i = 0 we get a semiorthogonal decomposition
T0 = hk, k(−1), . . . , k(a + 1), D−ai.
Thus, in this case DMFGm(W ) contains Db(Y ) as a full subcategory. Let
ρ : Db(Y ) ≃ D−a → T0 ≃ DMFGm(W )
(2.23)
(2.24)
be the corresponding fully faithful functor.
Caldararu and Tu showed that the above constructions can be performed at the dg-level
(see [7, Sec. 5]). In particular, the functors (2.22) and (2.24) lift to the dg-level.
For any graded module M over A we denote by M st the object of DMFGm(W ) corre-
sponding to M viewed as an object of the graded singularity category.
Proposition 2.7.1. Let us consider the composition
Φ : Db(Pn−1) → Db(Y )
ρ✲ T0 ≃ DMFGm(W ),
where the first arrow is the pull-back with respect to the embedding Y ⊂ Pn−1, and ρ is given
by (2.22) for a ≥ 0 and by (2.24) for a ≤ 0. Then the image of Φ is contained in the
triangulated subcategory of DMFGm(W ), generated by (k(−e)st)e∈Z.
23
Proof. Assume first that a ≤ 0. For e < 0 let us consider the truncated module A(−e)≥−a,
so that we have an exact sequence
0 → A(−e)≥−a → A(−e) → Ne → 0,
(2.25)
where Ne ∈ hk(−e), k(−e − 1), . . . , k(a + 1)i. Then we claim that A(−e)≥−a ∈ D−a. Indeed,
we have A(−e)≥−a ∈ Db(gr −A≥−a), so by the decomposition (2.20), it is enough to check
that
Ext∗
gr −A(A(−e)≥−a, P≥0) = 0.
But this follows from the exact sequence (2.25), since Ext∗
Now the same exact sequence shows that on the one hand,
gr −A(k(−j), P≥0) = 0 for j < −a.
π(A(−e)≥−a) = O(−e),
while on the other hand, the image of A(−e)≥−a in the graded singularity category is the
same as that of Ne[−1]. Hence, we deduce that
Φ(O(−e)) ∈ hk(−e)st, k(−e − 1)st, . . . , k(a + 1)sti ⊂ DMFGm(W ).
Since Db(Pn−1) is generated by the sheaves O(−e) with e < 0, the assertion follows in this
case.
Now assume that a ≥ 0. Then for e < 0 we consider the truncated module A(−e)≥0 that
fits into an exact sequence
where Me ∈ hk(−e), . . . , k(1)i. Then as above we deduce that A(−e)≥0 ∈ D0 and
0 → A(−e)≥0 → A(−e) → Me → 0
π(A(−e)≥0) = O(−e).
On the other hand, by the semiorthogonal decomposition (2.21) for i = 0, we have an exact
triangle
ρ(A(−e)≥0) → A(−e)≥0 → Q → . . .
with Q ∈ hA(−a + 1), . . . , A(−1), Ai. It follows that the image of ρ(A(−e)≥0) in the graded
singularity category is the same as that of Me, so we deduce that
Φ(O(−e)) ∈ hk(−e)st, . . . , k(1)sti ⊂ DMFGm(W ).
3 Rational structure on the Hochschild homology
3.1 Rational structure on the Hochschild homology of admissible
subcategories in the derived categories of sheaves
Let X be a smooth projective variety over C. Recall that the Hochschild homology HH∗(X)
can be identified with H ∗(X, C) = Lp,q H p,q(X) (with H p,q(X) ⊂ HHp−q(X)). We can
24
use this identification to define a rational lattice in HH∗(X). To get better compatibility
with the Chern characters and Fourier-Mukai type functors we insert some standard factors.
Namely, let us consider an automorphism
J : H ∗(X, C) → H ∗(X, C) : c 7→ (2πi)pc
for c ∈ H p,q(X),
and set2
HH∗(X)Q := J(H ∗(X, Q)) ⊂ H ∗(X, C) ≃ HH∗(X).
Proposition 3.1.1. (i) For any E ∈ Db(X) we have ch(E) ∈ HH∗(X)Q.
(ii) For any c, c′ ∈ HH∗(X)Q one has (c, c′)X ∈ Q, where (·, ·)X is the pairing (2.7).
(iii) For any Fourier-Mukai type functor Φ : Db(X) → Db(Y ), where Y is smooth projective,
the induced map Φ∗ : HH∗(X) → HH∗(Y ) sends HH∗(X)Q to HH∗(Y )Q.
Proof. (i) This follows immediately from Proposition 2.2.1.
(ii) We have
c · c′ · TdX ,
[X]
(c, c′)X =
1
(2πi)nZ top
so the assertion follows from the fact that c · c′ · TdX ∈ J(H ∗(X, Q)).
(iii) This follows from (i) and (ii) and from Lemma 2.4.2.
We will use the real structure on HH∗(X) = H ∗(X, C) associated with the rational lattice
HH∗(X)Q = J(H ∗(X, Q)). Let us denote by τ the corresponding complex conjugation map
on H ∗(X, C), so that τ (Jx) = Jx (where x 7→ x is the usual complex conjugation on
H ∗(X, C)). It is easy to check that
τ (c) = (−1)p(2πi)q−pc
for c ∈ H p,q(X).
(3.1)
Let T ⊂ Db(X) be an admissible subcategory. We can enhance T to a dg-category using
the dg-enhancement of Db(X) (see [23, Sec. 4]). By functoriality of the Hochschild homology,
applied to the inclusion functor and to its left adjoint Db(X) → T, the Hochschild homology
HH∗(T) gets identified with a direct summand of HH∗(X).
Proposition 3.1.2. The subgroup HH∗(T) ∩ HH∗(X)Q is a rational lattice in HH∗(T). If
T ֒→ Db(X ′) is a different embedding of T as admissible subcategory, where X ′ is a smooth
projective variety, then
HH∗(T) ∩ HH∗(X)Q = HH∗(T) ∩ HH∗(X ′)Q,
so that the lattice HH∗(T)Q := HH∗(T) ∩ HH∗(X)Q depends only on T. If T → T′ is a
dg-functor between two categories like this then the induced map HH∗(T) → HH∗(T′) is
compatible with these rational lattices.
2Choosing instead of J the automorphism c 7→ (2πi)qc, c ∈ H p,q(X), would work as well. The two choices
differ by the grading operator with respect to the Hochschild degree.
25
Proof. The projector functor Π : Db(X) → T ⊂ Db(X) is given by some kernel (see [24,
Thm. 7.1]). Hence, by Proposition 3.1.1, the induced projector Π∗ of HH∗(X) with the image
HH∗(T) sends HH∗(X)Q to HH∗(T) ∩ HH∗(X)Q, which implies that the latter subgroup is
a rational lattice in HH∗(T). Suppose we have a functor Φ : T → T′, where T′ ⊂ Db(X ′).
Then by Proposition 3.1.1(iii), the composed map
HH∗(X)
Π∗✲ HH∗(T)
Φ∗✲ HH∗(T′) → HH∗(X ′)
is compatible with rational lattices, hence, Φ∗ sends HH∗(T) ∩ HH∗(X)Q = Π∗(HH∗(X)Q)
to HH∗(T′) ∩ HH∗(X ′)Q. In the case Φ = Id this also proves the independence of the lattice
on the embedding T ֒→ Db(X).
3.2 Hodge-Riemann relations for matrix factorizations: homoge-
neous case
We use the rational lattices considered above to define a rational lattice in the Hochschild
homology of the category MFGm(W ), where W is a homogeneous polynomial with an isolated
singularity.
Lemma 3.2.1. Let W be a homogeneous polynomial with isolated singularity. Then there
exists a smooth projective variety X such that DMFGm(W ) is an admissible subcategory in
Db(X), in a way compatible with the dg-enhancements.
If a ≥ 0 then the semiorthogonal
Proof. Let a = n − d be the Gorenstein parameter.
decomposition (2.21) shows that we can take X to be the hypersurface Y ⊂ Pn−1 with the
equation W = 0. In the case a ≤ 0 we have the semiorthogonal decomposition (2.23) of
DMFGm(W ), with Db(Y ) as one of the pieces, where each of the remaining pieces is generated
by an exceptional object. Hence, the desired X can be constructed using [31, Thm. 4.15].
Combining this Lemma with Proposition 3.1.2 we equip the Hochschild homology H(W ) =
HH∗(MFGm(W )) with a (uniquely defined) rational lattice, such that the maps on Hochschild
homology induced by Fourier-Mukai transforms involving MFGm(W ) are compatible with this
lattice. We denote by x 7→ x the complex conjugation associated with the corresponding
real structure on H(W ).
Lemma 3.2.2. The subspace H(W )µd ⊂ H(W ) coming from the decomposition (2.17) is
compatible with the rational lattice in H(W ). The projector Π : H(W ) → H(W )µd is
compatible with the rational lattices.
Proof. Indeed, the operators of the Z/d-action on H(W ) are induced by the twist functors
E 7→ E{m}, hence they are compatible with the rational lattice in H(W ). It remains to
observe that H(W )µd is the subspace of Z/d-invariants in H(W ), and Π is precisely the
standard projector onto it (see [36, Thm. 2.6.1(ii)]).
Let us denote by h·, ·iW the canonical pairing (2.5) on H(W ).
26
Lemma 3.2.3. For any x ∈ H(W )µd ⊂ H(W ) and any m ∈ Z one has
hx, ch(k(m)st)iW = 0.
Proof. This follows from the explicit calculation of the pairing h·, ·iW and of ch(k(m)st) in
[34]. Note that the Z/2-folding of the dg-category MFGm,d(W ) is naturally isomorphic to the
Z/2-dg-category MFµd(W ) of µd-equivariant matrix factorizations (see [36, Sec. 2.1] and [34,
Sec. 4.4]). The computations in [34] were done in the context of Z/2-dg-categories but we
can use them due to the compatibility of all the Hochschild homology manipulations with
the Z/2-folding (see remarks at the end of Sec. 2.1). By [36, Prop. 4.3.4], we see that ch(kst)
has a trivial component in H(W )µd, i.e., Π(ch(kst)) = 0. It follows that Π(ch(k(m)st)) = 0
for any integer m (since Π is the projector onto the invariants of the Z/d-action). Now the
assertion follows from the fact that the summand H(W )µd is orthogonal to other summands
in the decomposition (2.17) with respect to h·, ·iW , as the explicit formula of [34, Thm. 4.2.1]
shows.
Proposition 3.2.4. Suppose we have a class x ∈ H(W )µd ∩ Hj(W ) for some j ∈ Z. If
hx, xiW = 0 then x = 0.
Proof. Let a be the Gorenstein parameter. Assume first that a ≥ 0. Then we have a fully
faithful functor λ : DMFGm(W ) → Db(Y ) and the right adjoint functor ρ (see (2.22)), such
that ρλ = Id. By Proposition 2.7.1, the map
ρ∗ : H ∗(Y, C) → H(W )
sends classes restricted from Pn−1 to the span of the Chern characters ch(k(m)st), m ∈ Z.
But the latter classes are orthogonal to H(W )µd with respect to h·, ·iW by Lemma 3.2.3.
Hence, by adjointness of λ∗ and ρ∗ (see Lemma 2.4.1), λ∗(H(W )µd) is left orthogonal to the
image of H ∗(Pn−1, C) → H ∗(Y, C) with respect to the pairing h·, ·iDb(Y ). Since TdY is a class
restricted from Pn−1, using (2.6) we get that
ZY
κ(λ∗(H(W )µd)) · c = 0
for any c restricted from Pn−1. Hence, for any x ∈ H(W )µd, λ∗(x) is a primitive class.
In particular, by the Lefschetz hyperplane theorem, λ∗(x) ∈ H n−2(Y, C).
If in addition
x ∈ Hj(W ) then λ∗(x) ∈ H p,q(Y ) for the unique p, q such that p + q = n − 2 and p − q = j.
Since λ∗ is compatible with rational lattices, we have
λ∗(x) = τ (λ∗(x)) = (−1)p(2πi)q−pλ∗(x)
(see (3.1)). Hence,
(−1)p(2πi)q−phλ∗(x), λ∗(x)iDb(Y ) = hλ∗(x), λ∗(x)iDb(Y ) = hx, ρ∗λ∗(x)iW = hx, xiW .
Thus, the vanishing of hx, xiW implies the vanishing of hλ∗(x), λ∗(x)iDb(Y ). Since λ∗(x) is
primitive, by Lemma 2.3.1, this implies that λ∗(x) = 0, and so x = 0.
27
Now assume that a ≤ 0. Then we have a fully faithful functor
ρ : Db(Y ) → DMFGm(W )
(see (2.24)), such that the image is the left orthogonal to kst, . . . , k(a + 1)st. Considering
the corresponding decomposition of H(W ) (see [23, Thm. 7.3]) we deduce that the image
of ρ∗ can be identified with the left orthogonal to ch(kst), . . . , ch(k(a + 1)st) with respect to
h·, ·iW . Since H(W )µd lies in this left orthogonal, we deduce that any x ∈ H(W )µd ∩ Hj(W )
has form x = ρ∗(y) for some y ∈ HHj(Y ). Furthermore, by Proposition 2.7.1 and Lemma
3.2.3, we have
hy, ciDb(Y ) = hx, ρ∗(c)iW = 0
for any c restricted from Pn−1. Thus, we deduce that y is a primitive class. Now we can
finish the proof as before, using Lemma 2.3.1 and the fact that ρ∗ is compatible with the
rational lattices.
Remark 3.2.5. It is easy to see that the Chern characters ch(k(m)st), m ∈ Z, span the
orthogonal complement to H(W )µd in H(W ). In the Calabi-Yau case, d = n, Proposition
2.7.1 implies that the subspace H(W )µd ⊂ H(W ) corresponds to the primitive part of the
middle cohomology of the projective hypersurface Y under the isomorphism
H(W ) ≃ H ∗(Y, C)
induced by the Orlov's equivalence. Note that the images of k(m)st in Db(Y ) under this
equivalence are calculated explicitly in [12, Prop. 4.11].
3.3 Hodge-Riemann relations for matrix factorizations: quasiho-
mogeneous case
Now let W (x1, . . . , xn) be a quasihomogeneous polynomial with an isolated singularity, such
n ) still has an
isolated singularity. Let us consider the corresponding finite flat Gm-equivariant morphism
between affine spaces
that the corresponding homogeneous polynomialfW (y1, . . . , yn) = W (yd1
1 , . . . , ydn
ϕ : An → An : (y1, . . . , yn) 7→ (yd1
1 , . . . , ydn
n ),
such that ϕ∗W = fW . We have the corresponding functors
ϕ∗ : MFGm(W ) → MFGm(fW ), ϕ∗ : MFGm(fW ) → MFGm(W ),
such that ϕ∗ϕ∗(E) ≃ ϕ∗O ⊗ E, where ϕ∗O corresponds to a free C[x1, . . . , xn]-module (with
generators of various degrees).
Lemma 3.3.1. The induced maps on the Hochschild homology
ϕ∗ : H(W ) → H(fW ), ϕ∗ : H(fW ) → H(W )
28
are compatible with the decompositions (2.17), and the composition
H(W )µd
ϕ∗✲ H(W )µd
ϕ∗✲ H(fW )µd
is the multiplication by deg(ϕ) = d1 . . . dn.
Proof. The first assertion immediately follows from the fact that ϕ∗ and ϕ∗ commute with
the twist functors E 7→ E{m}. Next, since ϕ∗O is free of rank deg(ϕ), we see that ϕ∗ϕ∗(E)
is a direct sum of deg(ϕ) twists E{m}.
It remains to use the fact that these twists act
trivially on the summand H(W )µd.
The above Lemma shows that the map
ϕ∗ : H(W )µd → H(fW )µd
is injective and its image coincides with the image of the map ϕ∗ϕ∗ : H(fW )µd → H(fW )µd.
Recall that by Lemma 3.2.2, the subspace H(fW )µd ⊂ H(fW ) is compatible with the rational
lattice in H(fW ). Since ϕ∗ϕ∗ is induced by a dg-endofunctor of MFGm(fW ), it follows that
the subspace
inherits a rational lattice, so we get a rational lattice on H(W )µd.
ϕ∗(H(W )µd) = ϕ∗ϕ∗(H(fW )µd) ⊂ H(fW )µd
Lemma 3.3.2. For any dg-functors F : DMFGm(W ) → T, G : T → DMFGm(W ), where T
is an admissible subcategory in Db(X) for some smooth and projective X, the induced maps
H(W )µd → H(W )
F∗✲ HH∗(T), HH∗(T)
G∗✲ H(W )
Π✲ H(W )µd
are compatible with rational structures.
Proof. By Lemma 3.3.1, to prove the assertion about F∗ we can replace it by F∗ϕ∗ϕ∗.
Since F∗ϕ∗ is induced by a dg-functor DMFGm(fW ) → T, it is compatible with the rational
lattices. But the restriction of ϕ∗ to H(W )µd preserves rational lattices by the definition, so
the assertion follows.
To check the assertion about ΠG∗, it is enough to prove it for the composition
ϕ∗ΠG∗ = Πϕ∗G∗ : HH∗(T) → H(fW )µd.
But ϕ∗G∗ is induced by a dg-functor T → DMFGm(fW ), so it compatible with the rational
lattices. It remains to use the fact that Π : H(fW ) → H(fW )µd is also compatible with the
rational lattices (see Lemma 3.2.2).
Remark 3.3.3. Using the connection between DMFGm(W ) and the derived category of the
corresponding stacky weighted projective hypersurface X from [29] and the recent paper [3],
one can equip the Hochschild homology H(W ) with a rational structure for any quasihomo-
geneous polynomial W with an isolated singularity. Namely, the main result of [3] implies
that Db(X) can be realized as an admissible subcategory in Db(Y ) for Y smooth and pro-
jective variety, so using the same approach as in Lemma 3.2.1 we can realize DMFGm(W ) as
such a subcategory.
29
As before, we denote by x 7→ x the conjugation associated with the real structure on
H(W )µd.
Proposition 3.3.4. Let W be a quasihomogeneous polynomial with an isolated singularity
j ∈ Z, if hx, xiW = 0 then x = 0.
such that fW still has an isolated singularity. Given a class x ∈ H(W )µd ∩ Hj(W ) for some
Proof. The map ϕ∗ : H(W )µd → H(fW )µd is rational, so using adjointness of (ϕ∗, ϕ∗) and
Lemma 2.4.1 we get
hϕ∗x, ϕ∗(x)ifW = hϕ∗x, ϕ∗(x)ifW = hx, ϕ∗ϕ∗(x)iW = deg(ϕ)hx, xiW = 0.
so by Lemma 3.3.1, x = 0.
Also we have ϕ∗x ∈ H(fW )µd ∩ Hj(fW ). Hence, by Proposition 3.2.4, we obtain ϕ∗x = 0, and
Remark 3.3.5. The idea of using the relation between matrix factorizations of W and fW
to deduce results about H(W ) was inspired by a similar method in [27, Sec. 6].
4 Homogeneity
4.1 Calculations with Koszul matrix factorizations
Let A and B be Gm-vector bundles over a scheme S (where Gm acts trivially on S), α ∈
H 0(tot(A), p∗B∨{d}) and β ∈ H 0(tot(A), p∗B) be Gm-invariant sections, where p : tot(A) →
S is the projection. Assume that α and β are orthogonal and have common zeros only on
the zero section in tot(A). Let
E = {α, β} ∈ MFGm,d(tot(A), 0)
be the corresponding Koszul matrix factorization of 0 on tot(A) (see Section 2.5). The
following homogeneity property follows from the results of [33] and [10] (it also appears
implicitly in the proof of [36, Prop. 5.6.1]).
Proposition 4.1.1. In the above situation we have
Td(B) Td(A)−1 ch(com(p∗E)) ∈ H 2(rk B−rk A)(S).
Proof. Note that
ch(com(p∗E)) = ch(p∗E) := ch(H even(p∗E)) − ch(H odd(p∗E)),
where on the right we view p∗E as a Z/2-graded complex. It is enough to show that in the
Chow group A∗(S)Q one has
Td(B) Td(A)−1 ch(p∗E) ∈ Ark B−rk A(S)Q.
30
By [10, Lemma 5.3.8], one has
Td(A)−1 ch(p∗E) = chtot A
S
(E) · [p],
S
where chtot A
(E) ∈ A∗(S → tot(A)) is the localized Chern character of the Z/2-graded
complex E in the relative Chow group for the zero section embedding S → tot(A) (see [33,
Sec. 2.2]), and [p] ∈ A−rkA(tot A → S) is the orientation class of p. Now by [33, Thm. 3.2],
the class
Td(B) chtot A
S
(E) ∈ A∗(S → tot A)
is concentrated in degree rk B. To get the class we need, one has to multiply the above class
with the orientation class [p] that lives in degree −rkA, hence the result.
Now let us consider the setup of Sec. 1.2. Note that the functor Φ : DMFGm(W ) → Db(X)
in (1.5) is of the form Φ = ΦP (see (2.16)) for the diagram
tot(A)
Z
p
✛
An
✲
X
and P = {α, β}. Note also that in this case DMFGm(W ) = DMFGm(W ) is the usual
homotopy category of matrix factorizations.
We start by computing the left adjoint functor Ψ : Db(X) → DMFGm(W ) to Φ.
Lemma 4.1.2. In the notation of (2.16), one has Ψ = ΨP ′, where
P ′ = {α′, β′} ⊗ p∗(det−1(A) ⊗ ωX)[N],
with α′ = β ∈ p∗B, β′ = −α ∈ p∗B∨{d}, N = dim X + rk A − n. Thus, the Koszul matrix
factorization {α′, β′} is of the same type as {α, β} but with B being replaced by B∨{d}.
Proof. By Proposition 2.6.2, we have Ψ = ΨP ′ with
P ′ = P ∨ ⊗ ωZ[N].
Recall that the dual matrix factorization P ∨ has the even part P ∨
and the differential δP ∨ determined by the rule
0 , the odd part P ∨
1 {−d},
hδP ∨(ξ), xi = (−1)deg(ξ)hξ, δP (x)i.
Thus, disregarding the Gm-action we can identify P ∨ with V∗(p∗B) using the isomorphism
(p∗B∨))∨ : b1 ∧ . . . ∧ bp 7→ [w 7→ (ιb1 ◦ . . . ◦ ιbp)(w)0],
^∗
(p∗B)
∼✲ (^∗
31
where the subscript 0 means taking the component in V0. Under this identification, with
the above sign convention, the operator dual to α∧ is −ια, and the operator dual to ιβ is
β∧. The Gm-weights work out so that we have an identification
Taking into account the isomorphism
P ∨ ≃ {α′, β′}.
ωZ ≃ ωtot A ≃ ωp ⊗ p∗ωX ≃ p∗(det−1(A) ⊗ ωX),
we get the assertion.
Lemma 4.1.3. In the above situation the composed functor Φ ◦ Ψ : Db(X) → Db(X) is
associated with a kernel K ∈ Db(X × X) such that [K] = d · [K ′] in K0(X × X), where
K ′ = com(cid:0)p(2)
∗ {α(2), β(2)}(cid:1) ⊗ p∗
1(det−1(A) ⊗ ωX)[N]
for a Koszul matrix factorization of zero {α(2), β(2)} on the vector bundle
p(2) : tot(A) ×An tot(A) → X × X,
associated with the sections α(2) = (α, α′) ∈ p∗
Furthermore, α(2) and β(2) have common zeros only on the zero section of the bundle p(2).
2B, β(2) = (β, β′) ∈ p∗
1B∨{d} ⊕ p∗
1B ⊕ p∗
2B∨{d}.
Proof. The computation of the composition follows from Lemma 2.6.1. The fact about the
common zeros of α(2) and β(2) follows from the similar fact about (α, β) and (α′, β′).
Note that the bundle tot(A) ×An tot(A) over X × X has rank 2 rk A − n. Thus, by
Proposition 4.1.1, we have
Td(p∗
1B∨) Td(p∗
2B) Td(p∗
1A)−1 Td(p∗
Using the formula
2A)−1 ch(cid:0)K⊗p∗
1(det(A)⊗ω−1
X )(cid:1) ∈ H 2(2 rk B−2 rk A+n)(X×X).
we can rewrite the above class as
Td(E∨) = Td(E) · ch(det(E))−1,
p∗
1(cid:0)ch(ωX)−1 Td(B∨) Td(A∨)−1(cid:1) · p∗
2(cid:0)Td(B) Td(A)−1(cid:1) ch(K) ∈ H 2D(X × X),
where D is given by (1.6).
(4.1)
4.2 The proof of Theorem 1.2.1
We start by reformulating the statement using the canonical bilinear forms on Hochschild
homology. Let φ = Φ∗ : H(W ) = HH∗(MFGm(W )) → H ∗(X) be the map induced by
Φ = ΦP on Hochschild homology. Let us set
α = Td(B) Td(A)−1,
32
By the nondegeneracy of the Poincar´e pairing, and by (2.6), the left orthogonal to
H i(X) ⊂ H ∗(X) with respect to h·, ·iDb(X) is the subspace
⊥H i(X) = Mj6=2 dim X−i
κ(TdX)−1 · H j(X) ⊂ H ∗(X),
where κ is given by (2.8). Since hx, α−1 · yiDb(X) = hκ(α−1) · x, yiDb(X), we deduce that
⊥(cid:0)α−1 · H i(X)(cid:1) = Mj6=2 dim X−i
κ(α · TdX)−1 · H j(X) ⊂ H ∗(X)
(4.2)
(note that κ(α) and κ(TdX) live in even degrees, so they commute with any cohomology
class).
By the nondegeneracy of h·, ·iDb(X), to show that φ(x) ∈ α−1 · H D(X) for all x ∈ H(W ),
it is enough to prove that
ψ(cid:0)⊥(cid:0)α−1 · H D(X)(cid:1)(cid:1) = 0,
where ψ is the left adjoint operator to φ. Note that by Lemma 2.4.1, we have ψ = Ψ∗. Thus,
taking into account (4.2), we should check that for each j 6= 2 dim X − D one has
ψ(cid:0)κ(α · Td−1
X ) · H j(X)(cid:1) = 0.
We are going to use the rational lattices on the relevant Hochschild homology introduced
in Sec. 3. We denote by x 7→ x (resp., τ ) the corresponding operation of complex conjugation
on H(W ) (resp., H ∗(X, C)).
Let y ∈ H p,q(X) ⊂ H j(X), and set y′ = κ(α Td−1
X ) · y. Note that y′, viewed as an element
of Hochschild homology, lives in the single degree p − q. Hence, the same is true about
z = ψ(y′). Also, since by Lemma 2.6.3, φΠ = φ, it follows that Πψ = ψ, so z ∈ H(W )µd.
By Proposition 3.3.4, z = 0 if and only if hz, ziW = 0. Thus, it is enough to prove that
hψ(y′), ψ(y′)iW = 0,
provided j 6= 2d − D.
We will use the following fact about the involution κ. For any vector bundle V on X one
has
κ(Td(V )) = Td(V ∨) = Td(V ) · ch(det(V ))−1.
(4.3)
In particular, the classes κ(Td(V )) and κ(Td(V )−1) = κ(Td(V ))−1 belong to the rational
lattice J(H ∗(X, Q)) (see Section 3.1).
Thus, the class κ(α Td−1
X ) is in J(H ∗(X, Q)). Hence, using (3.1) we get
τ (y′) = κ(α Td−1
X ) · τ (y) = (−1)p(2πi)q−pκ(α Td−1
X ) · y
Since the operator ψ = Πψ is compatible with the rational lattices (see Lemma 3.3.2), we
deduce
ψ(y′) = ψ(τ (y′)) = (−1)p(2πi)q−pψ(κ(α Td−1
X ) · y).
33
Hence, by adjointness of the pair (ψ, φ),
hψ(y′), ψ(y′)iW = (−1)p(2πi)q−phκ(α Td−1
X ) · y, φψ(y′)iDb(X).
(4.4)
Recall that φψ = Φ∗Ψ∗ = (Φ ◦ Ψ)∗ is induced by the Fourier-Mukai functor with the
kernel K, as in Lemma 4.1.3. Thus, by Lemma 2.4.2, we have
φψ(y′) = tr12(y′ ⊗ ch(K)) =Zp2
:= (ZX
where
Zp2
1(TdX ·y′) ch(K),
p∗
⊗ id) : H ∗(X × X) ≃ H ∗(X) ⊗ H ∗(X) → H ∗(X).
Taking into account the relation (4.3) we get
φψ(y′) =Zp2
1(ch(ωX)−1κ(α) · y) ch(K).
p∗
Thus, we can rewrite (4.4) as follows:
(−1)p(2πi)p−qhψ(y′), ψ(y′)iW = hκ(α Td−1
α · κ(y) · φψ(y′) =
(−1)pZX
(−1)pZX×X
y ·(cid:18)α ·Zp2
p∗
p∗
2(y) · p∗
X ) · y, φψ(y′)iDb(X) =ZX
1(ch(ωX)−1κ(α)y) · ch(K)(cid:19) =
1(y) ·(cid:0)p∗
1(ch(ωX)−1κ(α)) · p∗
2α · ch(K)(cid:1) .
Note that the condition (4.1) simply means that
p∗
1(ch(ωX)−1κ(α)) · p∗
2α · ch(K) ∈ H 2D(X × X).
On the other hand, p∗
2j + 2D = 4 dim X. In other words, it is zero unless j = 2 dim X − D.
1(y) ∈ H 2j(X × X). Thus, the above integral vanishes unless
2(y) · p∗
4.3 Proof of Theorem 1.1.1
Let W be a quasihomogeneous polynomial of degree d as in Theorem 1.1.1, and let G be a
finite group of diagonal symmetries of W , containing the exponential grading operator J.
Recall that for γ1, . . . , γr ∈ G the maps
φg(γ1, . . . , γr) : H(Wγ1)G ⊗ . . . ⊗ H(Wγr )G → H ∗(S, C),
where S = Sg,µd(γ1, . . . , γr) is the moduli of Γ-spin structures associated with G, giving the
algebraic FJRW cohomological field theory, are obtained in the following way (see [36, Sec.
5.1]). First, we consider the potential W = Wγ1 ⊕ . . . ⊕ Wγr , and the map
φ : HH∗(MFGm(W )) → H ∗(S, C)
34
defined as in Sec. 1.2, using a certain Gm-equivariant Koszul matrix factorization {α, β}
of −Z ∗W on the total space of a vector bundle p : tot(A) → S, equipped with a map
Z : tot(A) → An. The definition of the Koszul matrix factorization {α, β} is rather involved
(see [36, Sec. 4]) and will not be repeated here: for our purposes we only need to know that
it is supported on the zero section in tot(A). One difference from the framework of Sec. 1.2
is that S is not a variety, but a DM-stack. However, there is still a natural map
HH∗(S) → H ∗(S, C)
(4.5)
(see [36, Eq. (5.6)]), which we use to define φ with values in H ∗(S, C). Now the map φg is
obtained by restricting Td(A)−1 Td(B)φ to the subspace
H(Wγ1)µd ⊗ . . . ⊗ H(Wγr)µd ⊂ H(W )µd.
(here we use the fact that Td(A) Td(B)−1 = Td(Rπ∗(Ln
universal generalized spin-structure on S).
j=1
Lj)), where (L•) comes from a
Actually, in [36] we consider a bigger group Γ and a Γ-equivariant matrix factorization
P = (p, Z)∗{α, β} of −W on An × X to produce a map of C[G∗]-modules
HH∗(MFΓ(W )) → H ∗(S, C) ⊗ C[G∗],
where G∗ is the dual group to G. To get φg(γ1, . . . , γr) we specialize this map using the
evaluation at 1 homomorphism C[G∗] → C, compose the resulting map with a natural
embedding
H(Wγ1)G ⊗ . . . ⊗ H(Wγr )G → HH∗(MFΓ(W )) ⊗C[G∗] C,
and twist by Td(Rπ∗(Ln
j=1
Lj))−1. It is easy to check that one gets the same map by passing
to Gm-equivariant matrix factorizations and then applying the above procedure.
The map (4.5) is defined using a finite flat surjective morphism π : X → S, where X is a
smooth projective variety (the existence of such maps is a general fact about smooth proper
DM-stacks over C with projective coarse moduli spaces -- see [21, Thm. 4.4], [22, Thm. 2.1]).
In fact, (4.5) factors through the pull-back map
π∗ : HH∗(S) → HH∗(X) ≃ H ∗(X, C),
followed by the degree preserving map H ∗(X, C) → H ∗(S, C). Thus, it is enough to prove
the required purity of dimension over X. Taking into account the equality
Dg(γ1, . . . , γr) = − rk Rπ∗(
nMj=1
Lj) = rk B − rk A,
we see that Theorem 1.2.1 would imply the dimension property (1.2) provided we check
that the polynomial Wγ1 ⊕ . . . ⊕ Wγr satisfies the assumptions of that Theorem, i.e., each
homogeneous polynomial gWγi still has an isolated singularity at 0. But this follows easily
from Lemma 4.3.1 below.
35
1 , . . . , ydn
J
i
has an isolated singularity, where An
J ⊂ I the restriction W An
given by xj = 0 for all j ∈ J.
Lemma 4.3.1. Let W (x1, . . . , xn) be a quasihomogeneous polynomial with an isolated sin-
gularity, where deg(xi) = di > 0. Let I ⊂ [1, n] be the set of i such that di > 1. Then
n ) still has an isolated singularity if and only for every subset
J ⊂ An is the linear subspace
fW (y1, . . . , yn) = W (yd1
Proof. We have ∂yifW (y) = diydi−1
for i 6∈ I we have ∂yifW (y) = 0 if and only if ∂xiW (ϕ(y)) = 0. On the other hand, for i ∈ I
we have ∂yifW (y) = 0 if and only if either yi = 0 or ∂xiW (ϕ(y)) = 0. This easily implies
that y is a critical point of fW if and only if ϕ(x) is a critical point of W An
∂xiW (ϕ(y)), where ϕ(y1, . . . , yn) = (yd1
1 , . . . , ydn
n ). Thus,
for some subset
J
J ⊂ I.
5 APPENDIX: A compatibility involving the Grothendieck
duality.
Let f : Y → Z be a separated morphism of finite type between Noetherian schemes. We
denote by f + : D+(qcoh(Y )) → D+(qcoh(Z)) the extraordinary inverse image functor (see
[18] where it is denoted by f !). Then for any F ∈ Db(Y ) such that the support of F is proper
over Z, we have a canonical morphism
(5.1)
let F = i∗F ′,
Indeed, this can be reduced to a similar map in the case when f is proper:
where i : Y ′ → Y is a closed subscheme, proper over Z, and F ′ ∈ Db(Y ′). Then we have
f∗F ≃ f ′
∗F ′, where f ′ = f ◦ i. Since f ′ is proper, we have a canonical map
cf,F : F → f +f∗F.
cf ′,F ′ : F ′ → (f ′)+f ′
∗F ′ ≃ i+f +f∗F.
By adjunction of i∗ and i+ we get the required map
F = i∗F ′ → f +f∗F.
Furthermore, for such F and for any G ∈ Db(Z) the natural map
Hom(f∗F, G) → Hom(f +f∗F, f +G) → Hom(F, f +G),
(5.2)
where the second arrow is induced by cF , is an isomorphism (again this easily reduces to the
case when f is proper).
The fact that cf,F does not depend on a choice of the subscheme Y ′ follows from the
compatibility of the maps cf,F with compositions (for proper maps). Namely, for a morphism
g : Z → T we have a commutative triangle
F
cf,F ✲ f +f∗F
c
g
f
,
F
f +cg,f∗F
(5.3)
✲
❄
f +g+g∗f∗F
36
The above picture extends to matrix factorizations. Namely, let us assume that we have
the following situation:
(⋆): Y and Z are smooth Gm-varieties admitting Gm-equivariant ample line bundles;
f : Y → Z is a smooth Gm-equivariant morphism; W is a function on Z of weight d > 0
with respect to the Gm-action, which is not a zero divisor.
Then canonical morphism (5.1) can be constructed for F ∈ MFGm(Y, f ∗W ), with proper
support over Z, using Corollary 2.5.7, and the compatibility (5.3) still holds provided g is
also smooth Gm-equivariant and W = g∗W ′.
Next, let us consider the fibered product Y ×Z Y with its two projections p1, p2 : Y ×Z Y →
Y , and let δ : Y → Y ×Z Y be the diagonal embedding. Let us also set
Then for any F ∈ Db(Y ) we have a canonical morphism
π = f ◦ p1 = f ◦ p2 : Y ×Z Y → Z.
αF : δ∗F → p+
2 F
(5.4)
on Y ×Z Y , which corresponds by adjunction to the identity map
Equivalently, it corresponds by adjunction to the identity map
F → δ+p+
2 F ≃ F.
F ≃ p2∗δ∗F → F
(note that δ∗F is supported on the diagonal which is proper over Y ). Exchanging the roles
of the factors in Y ×Z Y we get canonical morphisms
F : δ∗F → p+
α′
1 F.
As before, we can define similar morphisms for F ∈ MFGm(Y, f ∗W ) assuming the situa-
tion (⋆).
We will need the following properties of the maps α and α′. We set Df = f +OZ ≃
ωf [dim Y − dim Z].
Lemma 5.0.2. (i) In the above situation, assuming that F ∈ Db(Y ) has the support that is
proper over Z, we have a commutative triangle
F ≃ p1∗δ∗F
p1∗(αF )✲ p1∗(p+
2 F )
c
f,F
θ
✲
❄
f +f∗F
where θ is the base change map, which corresponds via the isomorphism (5.2) for p1 to the
map
p+
2 F
p+
2 cf,F✲ p+
2 f +f∗F ≃ p+
1 f +f∗F
37
(note that the map from the support of p+
2 F to Y , induced by p1, is proper). The similar
assertion holds for F ∈ MFGm(Y, f ∗W ), with proper support over Z, assuming the situation
(⋆).
(ii) For F, G ∈ Db(Y ), or, assuming the situation (⋆), for F ∈ PerGm(Y ), G ∈ MFGm(Y, f ∗W ),
the diagram
δ∗(F ) ⊗ p∗
2G
∼
❄
δ∗(F ⊗ G)
αF ⊗ id✲ p+
2 F ⊗ p∗
2G
∼
❄
αF ⊗G✲ p+
2 (F ⊗ G)
is commutative. The same property holds for the maps α′.
(iii) Under the natural identification p+
1
Df ≃ p+
2
Df ≃ p∗
1
Df ⊗ p∗
2
Df one has
αDf = α′
Df ∈ Hom(δ∗Df , p∗
1
Df ⊗ p∗
2
Df ).
Proof. (i) Applying the compatibility (5.3) to the maps f , p1 and the object δ∗F we get that
cπ,δ∗F = cf p1,δ∗F is equal to the composition
δ∗F → p+
1 p1∗δ∗F = p+
1 F
p+
1 cf,F✲ p+
1 f +f∗F.
In other words, the map cf,F corresponds to cπ,δ∗F under the adjunction isomorphism (5.2).
Thus, we have to show that cπ,δ∗F = cf p2,δ∗F is equal to the composition
δ∗F
αF✲ p+
2 F
p+
2 cf,F✲ p+
2 f +f∗F ≃ p+
1 f +f∗F.
But this immediately follows from the compatibility (5.3) applied to the maps f , p2 and the
object δ∗F .
(ii) First, let us consider the case of sheaves. By reversing the direction of the isomorphism
of the left vertical arrow and using the adjointness of (δ∗, δ+) we reformulate the required
commutativity as showing that the following composition is the identity map:
∼✲ δ+(δ∗(F )⊗p∗
F ⊗G → δ+δ∗(F ⊗G)
2 (F ⊗G) ≃ F ⊗G,
(5.5)
where the first arrow is the adjunction map. Now we use the following standard compatibility
of the canonical morphisms tf,A,B : f +(A)⊗f ∗(B) → f +(A⊗B) with the projection formula:
for a proper map f the square
2 F ⊗p∗
αF✲ δ+(p+
∼✲ δ+p+
2G)
2G)
f +f∗(A ⊗ f ∗B)
✻
cf,A⊗f ∗B
∼ ✲ f +(f∗A ⊗ B)
✻
tf,f∗A,B
A ⊗ f ∗B
cf,A ⊗ id✲ f +f∗A ⊗ f ∗B
38
with the top horizontal arrow induced by the projection formula, is commutative. Applying
this to f = δ, A = F and g = p∗
2G we deduce the commutativity of the left square in the
diagram
δ+δ∗(F ⊗ G)
✻
∼✲ δ+(δ∗F ⊗ p∗
2G) ✲ δ+(p+
2 F ⊗ p∗
2G)
✻
✻
F ⊗ G
✲ δ+δ∗F ⊗ δ∗p∗
2G
✲ δ+p+
2 F ⊗ δ∗p∗
2G
Note that the second square is commutative by the functoriality of the map δ+A ⊗ δ∗B →
δ+(A ⊗ B) in A. It follows that the composition of the first three arrows in (5.5) is equal to
the map
F ⊗ G ≃ δ+p+
2 F ⊗ δ∗p∗
2G → δ+(p+
2 F ⊗ p∗
2G).
(5.6)
Next, for composable arrows f and g we have a commutative diagram
(f g)+(A) ⊗ (f g)∗(B)
tf g,A,B
✲ (f g)+(A ⊗ B)
∼
❄
∼
❄
g+f +(A) ⊗ g∗f ∗(B)
→ g+(f +(A) ⊗ f ∗(B)) →g+f +(A ⊗ B)
Applying this for f = p2, g = δ, A = F and B = G we deduce that the composition of (5.6)
with the last arrow in (5.5),
δ+(p+
2 F ⊗ p∗
2G)
∼✲ δ+p+
2 (F ⊗ G) ≃ F ⊗ G,
is the identity map of F ⊗ G.
The case of matrix factorization reduces to the case of (Gm-equivariant) sheaves using
the equivalences with the (Gm-equivariant) singularity categories. Namely, let Z0 ⊂ Z be
the hypersurface of zeros of W , Y0 = f −1(Z0). Note that the hypersurface of zeros of π∗W
is
π−1(Z0) = Y0 ×Z0 Y0.
Now G corresponds to an object of DSg,Gm(Y0), while the commutative diagram lives in the
category of matrix factorizations of π∗W , which is equivalent to the category DSg,Gm(Y0 ×Z0
Y0). Now we observe that the functors p∗
2 from matrix factorizations of f ∗W to those
of π∗W correspond to the similar functors
2 and p+
2, p+
p∗
2 : DSg,Gm(Y0, f ∗W ) → DSg,Gm(Y0 ×Z0 Y0).
The operation of tensoring a matrix factorization with an object P of the perfect derived
category corresponds for the category of singularity to the operation of tensoring with the
39
restriction of P to the zero locus of the potential (we apply this for f ∗W and for π∗W ).
Finally, we use the fact that
δ∗F π1 (Z0) ≃ δ∗(F Y0),
where δ : Y0 → Y0 ×Z0 Y0 is the diagonal, that follows from the base change formula.
(iii) Using the definition this reduces to checking the equality of the maps
OY
∼✲ δ+p+
1 f +OZ
and
OY
∼✲ δ+p+
2 f +OZ
under the identification π+OZ ≃ p+
the diagram with standard isomorphisms
1 f +OZ ≃ p+
2 f +OZ. This reduces to the commutativity of
(f gh)+ ∼✲ h+(f g)+
∼
∼
❄
(gh)+f +
❄
∼✲ h+g+f +
applied to the triples of morphisms (f, p1, δ) and (f, p2, δ).
Next, we assume that our map f fits into a diagram
Y
f
p
✛
Z
✲
X
and that we are given P ∈ Db(Y ), with proper support. Let us set Q = P ∨ ⊗ Df . Note that
we have a natural isomorphism p+
Df . Hence, we obtain a natural map on Y ×Z Y ,
2
OY ≃ p∗
1
eϕ : δ∗OY → δ∗(P ∨ ⊗ P ) ≃ δ∗OY ⊗ p∗
p∗
1(Df ⊗ P ∨) ⊗ p∗
2P = p∗
1Q ⊗ p∗
2P,
1P ∨ ⊗ p∗
2P
αO⊗id✲ p∗
1
Df ⊗ p∗
1P ∨ ⊗ p∗
2P ≃
(5.7)
where δ : Y → Y ×Z Y is the relative diagonal and αO is the map (5.4). Let pXX : Y ×Z Y →
X × X be the map with the components (pp1, pp2). Applying pXX,∗ to the above map and
using the natural map OX → p∗OY we get a canonical morphism
ϕ : ∆∗OX → ∆∗p∗OY ≃ pXX,∗δ∗OY → pXX,∗(p∗
1Q ⊗ p∗
2P ),
(5.8)
where ∆ = ∆X : X → X × X is the diagonal map.
We also consider an analogous construction for matrix factorizations in the situation (⋆),
where P is an object of MFGm(Y, −f ∗W ) with proper support. We then view Q as an object
40
of MFGm(Y, f ∗W ), and the analog of the map (5.7) can be constructed in MFGm,d(Y ×Z Y, 0).
Assuming in addition that X is smooth (so we can regard ∆∗OX as a perfect complex on
X × X), we get an analog of the map ϕ in MFGm,d(X × X, 0). Recall that in this situation
we have functors
eΦP : MFGm(Z, W ) → MFGm,d(X, 0), eΨQ : MFGm,d(X, 0) → MFGm(Z, W )
(see Sec. 2.6). In the case of sheaves we also denote by eΦP and eΨQ the similar Fourier-Mukai
functors between Db(Z) and Db(X).
The main result of this Appendix is the following compatibility (needed for the proof of
Proposition 2.6.2).
Proposition 5.0.3. In the two situations described above (with sheaves and with matrix
factorizations) the map
Hom(eΨQ(E), F ) → Hom(E,eΦP (F ))
obtained via (2.2) from the natural transformation Id → eΦP ◦eΨQ, induced by (5.8), is equal
to the composition
∼✲ Hom(p∗E ⊗ Q, f ∗F ⊗ Df ) ≃ Hom(p∗E, f ∗F ⊗ P )
∼✲
Hom(f∗(p∗E ⊗ Q), F )
Hom(E, p∗(f ∗F ⊗ P )).
Proof. By definition, we have to prove that the composition (5.9) is equal to the map
(5.9)
Hom(eΨQ(E), F )
eΦP✲ Hom(eΦPeΨQ(E),eΦP (F )) → Hom(E,eΦP (F )),
where the second arrow is induced by (5.8). Unraveling this leads to the following composi-
tion
Hom(f∗(p∗E ⊗ Q), F )
Hom(p∗E ⊗ p2∗(p∗
1Q ⊗ p∗
with the intermediate maps given by
(1)✲ Hom(p2∗p∗
2P ), f ∗F ⊗ P )
1(p∗E ⊗ Q), f ∗F )
(2)✲
(3)✲ Hom(E, p∗(f ∗F ⊗ P )),
1(p∗E ⊗Q), f ∗F ),
∼✲ p2∗p∗
1;
(1) : Hom(f∗(p∗E ⊗Q), F )
f ∗✲ Hom(f ∗f∗(p∗E ⊗Q), f ∗F )
∼✲ Hom(p2∗p∗
where the second arrow is induced by the base change isomorphism f ∗f∗
(2) : Hom(p2∗p∗
Hom(p2∗(p∗
1p∗E ⊗ p∗
1Q ⊗ p∗
2P ), f ∗F ⊗ P );
1(p∗E ⊗ Q), f ∗F )
⊗P✲ Hom(p2∗p∗
1(p∗E ⊗ Q) ⊗ P, f ∗F ⊗ P ) ≃
and
(3) : Hom(p2∗(p∗
2∗pXX,∗(p∗
Hom(pX
2P ), f ∗F ⊗ P )
2P ), p∗(f ∗F ⊗ P )) ≃
1p∗E ⊗ p∗
1p∗E ⊗ p∗
1 E ⊗ pXX,∗(p∗
1 E ⊗ ∆∗OX ), p∗(f ∗F ⊗ P )) ≃ Hom(E, p∗(f ∗F ⊗ P )),
2P )(cid:1), p∗(f ∗F ⊗ P ))
1Q ⊗ p∗
1Q ⊗ p∗
1Q ⊗ p∗
ϕ✲
2∗(cid:0)pX,∗
2∗(pX,∗
Hom(pX
Hom(pX
p∗✲
41
where pX
i
identifications p∗p2∗ ≃ pX
: X × X → X, for i = 1, 2, are the projections. Here we used the natural
2∗pXX,∗, p∗
1p∗ ≃ p∗
XX pX,∗
1
and the projection formula for pXX .
Let us set for brevity R := p∗
1Q ⊗ p∗
(3′) : Hom(p2∗(p∗
2P and eF := f ∗F ⊗ P . We claim that the map
1p∗E ⊗ R), eF ) → Hom(p∗E, eF ),
that corresponds to (3) under the identification Hom(E, p∗(f ∗F ⊗P )) ≃ Hom(p∗E, f ∗F ⊗P ),
is given simply by the composition
Hom(p2∗(p∗
1p∗E⊗R), eF )
where the first arrow is induced by (5.7).
rewrite (3) as the composition
eϕ✲ Hom(p2∗(p∗
1p∗E⊗δ∗OY ), eF ) ≃ Hom(p2∗δ∗(p∗E), eF ) ≃ Hom(p∗E, eF ),
Indeed, first, using the definition of ϕ we can
Hom(p2∗(p∗
Hom(pX
Hom(pX
2∗pXX,∗(p∗
2∗(pX,∗
2∗pXX,∗(p∗
p∗✲ Hom(pX
1p∗E ⊗ R), eF )
1p∗E ⊗ δ∗OY ), p∗eF ) ≃ Hom(pX
1 E ⊗ ∆∗OX ), p∗eF ) ≃ Hom(E, p∗eF ).
p∗ ✲ Hom(pX
Hom(p2∗(p∗
Now we observe that there is a commutative diagram
eϕ✲
2∗(pX,∗
1p∗E ⊗ R), p∗eF )
1 E ⊗ pXX,∗δ∗OY ), p∗eF ) →
1p∗E ⊗ R), eF )
eϕ
1p∗E ⊗ δ∗OY ), eF )
❄
2∗pXX,∗(p∗
1p∗E ⊗ R), p∗eF )
p∗✲ Hom(pX
2∗pXX,∗(p∗
❄
eϕ
1p∗E ⊗ δ∗OY ), p∗eF )
Hom(p2∗(p∗
∼
❄
Hom(p2∗δ∗p∗E, eF )
∼
❄
Hom(p∗E, eF )
∼✲ pX
E
∼
❄
∼
❄
p∗ ✲ Hom(pX
2∗pXX,∗δ∗p∗E, p∗eF )
p∗
✲ Hom(p∗p∗E, p∗eF )
Hence, our claim about the map (3′) follows from the commutativity of the diagram
2∗(pX,∗
1 E ⊗ ∆∗OX ) ✲ pX
2∗(pX,∗
1 E ⊗ pXX,∗δ∗OY )
❄
p∗p∗E
∼ ✲ pX
2∗pXX,∗δ∗p∗E
42
∼
❄
∼✲ pX
2∗pXX,∗(p∗
1p∗E ⊗ δ∗OY )
which is easy to check.
Our description of (3′) implies that we have a commutative diagram
Hom(p2∗(p∗
1(p∗E ⊗ Q)), f ∗F )
(3′) ◦ (2) ✲ Hom(p∗E, f ∗F ⊗ P )
β ∼
❄
Hom(p2∗p+
1 (p∗E ⊗ Q), f +F )
∼
(5.10)
γ ✲ Hom(p∗E ⊗ P ∨ ⊗ Df , f +F )
❄
Here β is the composition of the natural isomorphisms
β : Hom(p2∗p∗
Hom(p2∗p+
1(p∗E ⊗ Q), f ∗F )
1 (p∗E ⊗ Q), f +F ),
∼✲ Hom(p2∗p∗
1(p∗E ⊗ Q) ⊗ Df , f ∗F ⊗ Df )
∼✲
where in the second isomorphism we use the identification p+
1
composition
OY ≃ p∗
2
Df , and γ is the
γ : Hom(p2∗p+
Hom(p∗E ⊗ P ∨ ⊗ Df , f +F ),
1 (p∗E ⊗ Q), f +F ) → Hom(p2∗(cid:0)p+
1 (p∗E ⊗ Q) ⊗ p∗
2P ⊗ p∗
2P ∨(cid:1), f +F ) →
where the first arrow is induced by the evaluation map evP : P ⊗ P ∨ → OY , while the second
arrow is induced by the map
p∗E ⊗ P ∨ ⊗ Df ≃ p2∗(cid:0)p∗
p2∗(cid:0)p+
1 (p∗E ⊗ Q) ⊗ p∗
where ǫ is the composition
2P ⊗ p∗
2P ∨(cid:1),
1p∗E ⊗ δ∗(P ∨ ⊗ Df )(cid:1) p2∗(id ⊗ǫ)✲ p2∗(p∗
1p∗E ⊗ p+
1 Q ⊗ p∗
2P ⊗ p∗
2P ∨) ≃
(5.11)
ǫ : δ∗(P ∨ ⊗ Df ) ≃ δ∗OY ⊗ p∗
2P ∨ ⊗ p∗
2
Df
eϕ⊗id✲ p∗
1Q ⊗ p∗
2P ⊗ p∗
2P ∨ ⊗ p∗
2
Df ≃ p+
1 Q ⊗ p∗
2P ⊗ p∗
2P ∨.
Next, let us consider the composed map
(1′) : Hom(f∗(p∗E⊗Q), F )
(1)✲ Hom(p2∗p∗
1(p∗E⊗Q), f ∗F )
β✲ Hom(p2∗p+
1 (p∗E⊗Q), f +F ).
Applying Lemma 5.0.2(i) to the object p∗E ⊗ Q we get that the composition
p∗E ⊗ Q ≃ p2∗δ∗(p∗E ⊗ Q)
p2∗(αp∗ E⊗Q)✲ p2∗p+
1 (p∗E ⊗ Q) → f +f∗(p∗E ⊗ Q)
is just the map (5.1). This implies the commutativity of the following triangle
Hom(f∗(p∗E ⊗ Q), F )
(1′)✲ Hom(p2∗p+
1 (p∗E ⊗ Q), f +F )
γ′
✲
❄
Hom(p∗E ⊗ Q, f +F )
∼
43
(5.12)
where the diagonal is the adjunction isomorphism and γ′ is induced by the map
p∗E ⊗ Q ≃ p2∗δ∗(p∗E ⊗ Q)
p2∗(α′
p∗ E⊗Q)✲ p2∗p+
1 (p∗E ⊗ Q).
Comparing the diagrams (5.10) and (5.12) with the definition of the map (5.9), we see that
our assertion would follow from the equality γ′ = γ, which in turn would be implied by the
commutativity of the diagram
p∗E ⊗ P ∨ ⊗ Df
1 (p∗E ⊗ Q) ⊗ p∗
2P ⊗ p∗
✲ p2∗(cid:0)p+
2P ∨(cid:1)
=
❄
p∗E ⊗ Q
p2∗(α′
p∗E⊗Q)
evp∗
2P
❄
✲ p2∗p+
1 (p∗E ⊗ Q)
where the top horizontal arrow is (5.11). Note that this diagram is obtained by applying the
functor p2∗ to the diagram
1p∗E ⊗ δ∗(P ∨ ⊗ Df )
p∗
id ⊗ǫ✲ p+
1 (p∗E ⊗ Q) ⊗ p∗
2P ⊗ p∗
2P ∨
∼
❄
δ∗(p∗E ⊗ Q)
α′
p∗E⊗Q
evp∗
2P
❄
✲ p+
1 (p∗E ⊗ Q)
Unraveling the definition of ǫ and using Lemma 5.0.2(ii), we see that the latter diagram is
obtained by tensoring with p∗
1p∗E from the diagram
δ∗Df ⊗ p∗
2P ∨
∼
❄
δ∗Df ⊗ p∗
1P ∨
α′
Df
⊗ id
✲ p+
1
where the top arrow is the composition
✲ p+
2
Df ⊗ p∗
1P ∨ ⊗ p∗
2P ⊗ p∗
2P ∨
evp∗
2P
❄
Df ⊗ p∗
1P ∨ ≃p+
2
Df ⊗ p∗
1P ∨
(5.13)
δ∗Df ⊗ p∗
2P ∨ → δ∗Df ⊗ p∗
2P ∨ ⊗ p∗
2P ⊗ p∗
1P ∨
αD
f
⊗id✲ p+
2
Df ⊗ p∗
2P ∨ ⊗ p∗
2P ⊗ p∗
1P ∨.
Thus, it remains to prove the commutativity of (5.13). Using the commutative diagram
δ∗Df ⊗ p∗
2P ∨ ⊗ p∗
2P ⊗ p∗
1P ∨ αDf ⊗ id✲ p+
2
Df ⊗ p∗
2P ∨ ⊗ p∗
2P ⊗ p∗
1P ∨
evp∗
2P
❄
δ∗Df ⊗ p∗
1P ∨
evp∗
2P
❄
Df ⊗ p∗
1P ∨
✲ p+
2
αDf ⊗ id
44
we can rewrite the composition of the top arrow with the right vertical arrow in (5.13) as
the map
δ∗Df ⊗ p∗
2P ∨ → δ∗Df ⊗ p∗
2P ∨ ⊗ p∗
2P ⊗ p∗
1P ∨
evp∗
2 P✲ δ∗Df ⊗ p∗
1P ∨
αD
f
⊗id✲ p+
2
Df ⊗ p∗
1P ∨.
Here the composition of the first two arrows coincides with the left vertical arrow in (5.13),
so we get the commutativity of the diagram like (5.13) but with αDf instead of α′
in the
bottom arrow. It remains to recall that αDf = α′
by Lemma 5.0.2(iii).
Df
Df
References
[1] M. Atiyah, Complex analytic connections in fibre bundles, Trans. AMS 85 (1957), 181 --
207.
[2] M. Ballard, D. Deliu, D. Favero, M. U. Isik, L. Katzarkov, Resolutions in factorization
categories, Adv. Math. 295 (2016), 195 -- 249.
[3] D. Bergh, V. A. Lunts, O. M. Schnurer, Geometricity for derived categories of algebraic
stacks, arXiv:1601.04465.
[4] A. Blanc, Topological K-theory of complex noncommutative spaces, Compos. Math. 152
(2016), no. 3, 489 -- 555.
[5] A. Bondal, M. Kapranov, Representable functors, Serre functors, and reconstructions,
Math. USSR-Izv. 35 (1990), no. 3, 519 -- 541.
[6] A. Caldararu, The Mukai pairing. II. The Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg isomorphism,
Adv. Math. 194 (2005) 34 -- 66.
[7] A. Caldararu, J. Tu, Curved A∞-algebras and Landau-Ginzburg models, New York J.
Math. 19 (2013), 305 -- 342.
[8] A. Caldararu, S. Willerton, The Mukai Paring I: a categorical approach, New York J.
Math. 16 (2010), 61 -- 98.
[9] H.-L. Chang, J. Li, W.-P. Li, Witten's top Chern class via cosection localization, Invent.
Math. 200 (2015), no. 3, 1015 -- 1063.
[10] A. Chiodo, Witten's top Chern class via K-theory, J. Algebraic Geom. 15 (2006), no. 4,
681 -- 707.
[11] A. Chiodo, Y. Ruan, LG/CY correspondence: the state space isomorphism, Adv. Math.
227 (2011), no. 6, 2157 -- 2188.
[12] A. Chiodo, H. Iritani, Y. Ruan, Landau-Ginzburg/Calabi-Yau correspondence, global
mirror symmetry and Orlov equivalence, Publ. Math. IHES 119 (2014), 127 -- 216.
45
[13] P. Deligne, Hodge cycles on abelian varieties, in Hodge cycles, motives, and Shimura
varieties, LNM 900, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1982.
[14] T. Dyckerhoff, Compact generators in categories of matrix factorizations, Duke Math.
J. 159 (2011), 223 -- 274.
[15] A. Efimov, L. Positselski, Coherent analogues of matrix factorizations and relative sin-
gularity categories, Algebra Number Theory 9 (2015), no. 5, 1159 -- 1292.
[16] H. Fan, T. Jarvis, Y. Ruan, The Witten equation, mirror symmetry and quantum singu-
larity theory, Ann. of Math. (2) 178 (2013), 1 -- 106.
[17] J. Gu´er´e, A Landau -- Ginzburg mirror theorem without concavity, arXiv:1307.5070.
[18] R. Hartshorne, Residues and Duality, Lecture Notes in Math. 20, Springer-Verlag,
Berlin, 1966.
[19] M. Kontsevich, XI Solomon Lefschetz Memorial Lecture Series: Hodge structures in non-
commutative geometry (Notes by Ernesto Lupercio), in Non-commutative geometry in
mathematics and physics, 1 -- 21, AMS, Providence, RI, 2008.
[20] M. Kontsevich, Yu. I. Manin, Gromov-Witten classes, quantum cohomology, and enu-
merative geometry, Commun. Math. Phys. 164 (1994), 525 -- 562.
[21] A. Kresch, On the geometry of Deligne-Mumford stacks, in Algebraic geometry (Seattle
2005), Part 1, 259 -- 271, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2009.
[22] A. Kresch, A. Vistoli, On coverings of Deligne-Mumford stacks and surjectivity of the
Brauer map, Bull. London Math. Soc. 36 (2004), no. 2, 188 -- 192.
[23] A. Kuznetsov,
Hochschild
homology
and
semiorthogonal
decompositions,
arXiv:0904.4330.
[24] A. Kuznetsov, Base change for semiorthogonal decompositions, Compos. Math. 147
(2011), 852 -- 876.
[25] K. Lin, D. Pomerleano, Global matrix factorizations, Math. Res. Lett. 20 (2013), no. 1,
91 -- 106.
[26] E. Macr´ı, P. Stellari, Infinitesimal derived Torelli theorem for K3 surfaces, IMRN 17
(2009), 3190 -- 3220.
[27] W. F. Moore, G. Piepmeyer, S. Spiroff, M. E. Walker, Hochster's theta invariant and the
Hodge-Riemann bilinear relations, Adv. Math. 226 (2011), 1692 -- 1714.
[28] D. Orlov, Triangulated categories of singularities and D-branes in Landau-Ginzburg mod-
els, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 2004, no. 3 (246), 227 -- 248.
46
[29] D. Orlov, Derived categories of coherent sheaves and triangulated categories of singular-
ities, in Algebra, arithmetic, and geometry: in honor of Yu. I. Manin, Vol. II, 503 -- 531,
Birkhauser, Boston, MA, 2009.
[30] D. Orlov, Matrix factorizations for nonaffine LG-models, Math. Ann. 353 (2012), 95 --
108.
[31] D. Orlov, Smooth and proper noncommutative schemes and gluing of DG categories,
arXiv:1402.7364.
[32] A. Polishchuk, Lefschetz type formulas for dg-categories, Selecta Math. 20 (2014), 885 --
928.
[33] A. Polishchuk and A. Vaintrob, Algebraic construction of Witten's top Chern class, in
Advances in algebraic geometry motivated by physics (Lowell, MA, 2000), 229 -- 249,
Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2001.
[34] A. Polishchuk, A. Vaintrob, Chern characters and Hirzebruch-Riemann-Roch formula
for matrix factorizations, Duke Math. J. 161 (2012), 1863 -- 1926.
[35] A. Polishchuk, A. Vaintrob, Matrix factorizations and singularity categories for stacks,
Ann. Inst. Fourier 61 (2011), 2609 -- 2642.
[36] A. Polishchuk, A. Vaintrob, Matrix factorizations and Cohomological Field Theories, J.
Reine Angew. Math. 714 (2016), 1 -- 122.
[37] A. C. Ramadoss, The relative Riemann-Roch theorem from Hochschild homology, New
York J. Math. 14 (2008), 643 -- 717.
[38] I. Shipman, A geometric approach to Orlov's theorem, Compos. Math. 148 (2012), no.
5, 13651389.
[39] D. Shklyarov, Hirzebruch-Riemann-Roch-type theorem for DG algebras, Proc. London
Math. Soc. 106 (2013), 1 -- 32.
[40] R. W. Thomason, Algebraic K-theory of group scheme actions, in Algebraic topology and
algebraic K-theory (Princeton, N.J., 1983), 539 -- 563, Princeton Univ. Press, 1987.
[41] B. Toen, The homotopy theory of dg-categories and derived Morita theory, Invent. Math.
167 (2007), 615 -- 667.
[42] B. Toen, M. Vaqui´e, Moduli of objects in dg-categories, Ann. Sci. ENS (4) 40 (2007),
387 -- 444.
[43] R. O. Wells, Differential analysis on complex manifolds, Springer-Verlag, New York,
1980.
Department of Mathematics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97405
47
|
1712.02528 | 3 | 1712 | 2018-02-25T10:04:28 | Cohomological field theory calculations | [
"math.AG"
] | Cohomological field theories (CohFTs) were defined in the mid 1990s by Kontsevich and Manin to capture the formal properties of the virtual fundamental class in Gromov-Witten theory. A beautiful classification result for semisimple CohFTs (via the action of the Givental group) was proven by Teleman in 2012. The Givental-Teleman classification can be used to explicitly calculate the full CohFT in many interesting cases not approachable by earlier methods. My goal here is to present an introduction to these ideas together with a survey of the calculations of the CohFTs obtained from Witten's classes on the moduli spaces of r-spin curves, Chern characters of the Verlinde bundles on the moduli of curves, and Gromov-Witten classes of the Hilbert schemes of points of the plane. The subject is full of basic open questions. | math.AG | math |
Cohomological field theory calculations
Rahul Pandharipande
February 2018
Abstract
Cohomological field theories (CohFTs) were defined in the mid 1990s
by Kontsevich and Manin to capture the formal properties of the virtual
fundamental class in Gromov-Witten theory. A beautiful classification
result for semisimple CohFTs (via the action of the Givental group) was
proven by Teleman in 2012. The Givental-Teleman classification can be
used to explicitly calculate the full CohFT in many interesting cases not
approachable by earlier methods.
My goal here is to present an introduction to these ideas together with
a survey of the calculations of the CohFTs obtained from
• Witten's classes on the moduli spaces of r-spin curves,
• Chern characters of the Verlinde bundles on the moduli of curves,
• Gromov-Witten classes of Hilbert schemes of points of C2.
The subject is full of basic open questions.
0 Introduction
0.1 Moduli of curves
The moduli space Mg of complete, nonsingular, irreducible, algebraic curves
over C of genus g has been a central object in mathematics since Riemann's
work in the middle of the 19th century. The Deligne-Mumford compactification
Mg ⊂ Mg
by nodal curves was defined almost 50 years ago [10].
We will be concerned here with the moduli space of curves with marked
points,
Mg,n ⊂ Mg,n ,
in the stable range 2g − 2 + n > 0. As a Deligne-Mumford stack (or orbifold),
Mg,n is nonsingular, irreducible, and of (complex) dimension 3g − 3 + n. There
are natural forgetful morphisms
dropping the last marking.
p : Mg,n+1 → Mg,n
1
The boundary1 of the Deligne-Mumford compactification is the closed locus
parameterizing curves with a least one node,
∂Mg,n = Mg,n \ Mg,n .
By identifying the last two markings of a single (n + 2)-pointed curve of genus
g − 1, we obtain a morphism
q : Mg−1,n+2 → Mg,n .
Similarly, by identifying the last markings of separate pointed curves, we obtain
r : Mg1,n1+1 × Mg2,n2+1 → Mg,n ,
where n = n1 + n2 and g = g1 + g2. The images of both q and r lie in the
boundary ∂Mg,n ⊂ Mg,n.
The cohomology and Chow groups of the moduli space of curves are
H ∗(Mg,n, Q) and A∗(Mg,n, Q) .
While there has been considerable progress in recent years, many basic questions
about the cohomology and algebraic cycle theory remain open.2
0.2 Gromov-Witten classes
Let X be a nonsingular projective variety over C, and let
Mg,n(X, β)
be the moduli space of genus g, n-pointed stable maps to X representing the
class β ∈ H2(X, Z). The basic structures carried by Mg,n(X, β) are forgetful
maps,
π : Mg,n(X, β) → Mg,n ,
to the moduli space of curves via the domain (in case 2g − 2 + n > 0) and
evaluation maps,
evi : Mg,n(X, β) → X ,
for each marking 1 ≤ i ≤ n.
Given cohomology classes v1, . . . , vn ∈ H ∗(X, Q), the associated Gromov-
Witten class is defined by
ΩX
g,n,β(v1, . . . , vn) = π∗ nYi=1
i (vi) ∩ [Mg,n(X, β)]vir! ∈ H ∗(Mg,n, Q) .
ev∗
1Since Mg,n is a closed nonsingular orbifold, the boundary here is not in the sense of
orbifold with boundary. If g = 0, there is no boundary map q.
2See [31] for a survey of results and open questions.
2
(cid:10)v1, . . . , vn(cid:11)X
g,n,β =ZMg,n
ΩX
g,n,β(v1, . . . , vn) .
Central to the construction is the virtual fundamental class of the moduli space
of stable maps,
[Mg,n(X, β)]vir ∈ H2·virdim(Mg,n(X, β), Q) ,
of virtual dimension
virdim =Zβ
c1(X) + (1 − g) · (dimC(X) − 3) + n .
Gromov-Witten classes contain much more information than the Gromov-Witten
invariants defined by integration,
We refer the reader to [3, 4, 9, 15] for a detailed treatment of stable maps, virtual
fundamental classes, and Gromov-Witten invariants in algebraic geometry.
The Gromov-Witten classes satisfy formal properties with respect to the
natural forgetful and boundary maps p, q, and r discussed in Section 0.1. The
idea of a cohomological field theory was introduced by Kontsevich and Manin
[21] to fully capture these formal properties.
0.3 Cohomological field theories
The starting point for defining a cohomological field theory is a triple of data
(V, η, 1
¯
) where
• V is a finite dimensional Q-vector space,
• η is a non-degenerate symmetric 2-form on V ,
∈ V is a distinguished element.
• 1
¯
Given a Q-basis {ei} of V , the symmetric form η can be written as a matrix
ηjk = η(ej, ek) .
The inverse matrix is denoted, as usual, by ηjk.
A cohomological field theory consists of a system Ω = (Ωg,n)2g−2+n>0 of
tensors
Ωg,n ∈ H ∗(Mg,n, Q) ⊗ (V ∗)⊗n.
The tensor Ωg,n associates a cohomology class in H ∗(Mg,n, Q) to vectors
assigned to the n markings. We will use both
v1, . . . , vn ∈ V
Ωg,n(v1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ vn)
and Ωg,n(v1, . . . , vn)
to denote the associated cohomology class in H ∗(Mg,n, Q).
In order to define a cohomological field theory, the system Ω = (Ωg,n)2g−2+n>0
must satisfy the CohFT axioms:
3
(i) Each tensor Ωg,n is Σn-invariant for the natural action of the symmetric
group Σn on
H ∗(Mg,n, Q) ⊗ (V ∗)⊗n
obtained by simultaneously permuting the n marked points of Mg,n and
the n factors of V ∗.
(ii) The tensor q∗(Ωg,n) ∈ H ∗(Mg−1,n+2, Q) ⊗ (V ∗)⊗n, obtained via pull-back
by the boundary morphism
q : Mg−1,n+2 → Mg,n ,
is required to equal the contraction of Ωg−1,n+2 by the bi-vector
ηjkej ⊗ ek
inserted at the two identified points:
Xj,k
q∗(Ωg,n(v1, . . . , vn)) =Xj,k
ηjk Ωg−1,n+2(v1, . . . , vn, ej, ek)
in H ∗(Mg−1,n+2, Q) for all vi ∈ V .
The tensor r∗(Ωg,n), obtained via pull-back by the boundary morphism
r : Mg1,n1+1 × Mg2,n2+1 → Mg,n ,
is similarly required to equal the contraction of Ωg1,n1+1 ⊗ Ωg2,n2+1 by the
same bi-vector:
r∗(Ωg,n(v1, . . . , vn)) =
Xj,k
ηjk Ωg1,n1+1(v1, . . . , vn1 , ej) ⊗ Ωg2,n2+1(vn1+1, . . . , vn, ek)
in H ∗(Mg1,n1+1, Q) ⊗ H ∗(Mg2,n2+1, Q) for all vi ∈ V .
(iii) The tensor p∗(Ωg,n), obtained via pull-back by the forgetful map
p : Mg,n+1 → Mg,n ,
is required to satisfy
) = p∗Ωg,n(v1, . . . , vn)
Ωg,n+1(v1, . . . , vn, 1
¯
for all vi ∈ V . In addition, the equality
Ω0,3(v1, v2, 1
) = η(v1, v2)
¯
is required for all vi ∈ V .
4
Definition 1 A system Ω = (Ωg,n)2g−2+n>0 of tensors
Ωg,n ∈ H ∗(Mg,n, Q) ⊗ (V ∗)⊗n
satisfying (i) and (ii) is a cohomological field theory or a CohFT. If (iii) is also
satisfied, Ω is a CohFT with unit.
The simplest example of a cohomological field theory with unit is given by
the trivial CohFT,
V = Q , η(1, 1) = 1 , 1
¯
= 1 , Ωg,n(1, . . . , 1) = 1 ∈ H 0(Mg,n, Q) .
A more interesting example is given by the total Chern class
c(E) = 1 + λ1 + . . . + λg ∈ H ∗(Mg,n, Q)
of the rank g Hodge bundle E → Mg,n,
V = Q , η(1, 1) = 1 , 1
¯
= 1 , Ωg,n(1, . . . , 1) = c(E) ∈ H ∗(Mg,n, Q) .
Definition 2 For a CohFT Ω = (Ωg,n)2g−2+n>0, the topological part ω of Ω
is defined by
ωg,n = [Ωg,n]0 ∈ H 0(Mg,n, Q) ⊗ (V ∗)⊗n .
The degree 0 part [ ]0 of Ω is simply obtained from the canonical summand
projection
[ ]0 : H ∗(Mg,n, Q) → H 0(Mg,n, Q) .
If Ω is a CohFT with unit, then ω is also a CohFT with unit. The topological
part of the CohFT obtained from the total Chern class of the Hodge bundle is
the trivial CohFT.
The motivating example of a CohFT with unit is obtained from the Gromov-
Witten theory of a nonsingular projective variety X. Here,
V = H ∗(X, Q) , η(v1, v2) =ZX
v1 ∪ v2 , 1
¯
= 1 .
Of course, the Poincar´e pairing on H ∗(X, Q) is symmetric only if X has no
odd cohomology.3 The tensor Ωg,n is defined using the Gromov-Witten classes
ΩX
g,n,β of Section 0.2 (together with a Novikov4 parameter q),
Ωg,n(v1, . . . , vn) = Xβ∈H2(X,Q)
ΩX
g,n,β qβ .
The CohFT axioms here coincide exactly with the axioms5 of Gromov-Witten
theory related to the morphisms p, q, and r. For example, axiom (ii) of a CohFT
here is the splitting axiom of Gromov-Witten theory, see [21].
3To accommodate the case of arbitrary X, the definition of a CohFT can be formulated
with signs and Z/2Z-gradings. We do not take the super vector space path here.
4Formally, we must extend scalars in the definition of a CohFT from Q to the Novikov ring
to capture the Gromov-Witten theory of X.
5The divisor axiom of Gromov-Witten theory (which concerns divisor and curve classes on
X) is not part of the CohFT axioms.
5
0.4 Semisimplicity
A CohFT with unit Ω defines a quantum product • on V by6
η(v1 • v2, v3) = Ω0,3(v1 ⊗ v2 ⊗ v3) .
The quantum product • is commutative by CohFT axiom (i). The associativity
of • follows from CohFT axiom (ii). The element 1
∈ V is the identity for • by
¯
the second clause of CohFT axiom (iii). Hence,
is a commutative Q-algebra.
(V, •, 1
)
¯
Lemma 3 The topological part ω of Ω is uniquely and effectively determined by
the coefficients
Ω0,3(v1, v2, v3) ∈ H ∗(M0,3, Q)
of the quantum product •.
Proof. Let the moduli point [C, p1, . . . , pn] ∈ Mg,n correspond to a maximally
degenerate curve (with every component isomorphic to P1 with exactly 3 special
points). Since
ωg,n(v1, . . . , vn) ∈ H 0(Mg,n, Q) ,
is a multiple of the identity class, ωg,n(v1, . . . , vn) is determined by the pull-back
to the point [C, p1, . . . , pn]. The equality
ωg,n(v1, . . . , vn)(cid:12)(cid:12)[C,p1,...,pn] = Ωg,n(v1, . . . , vn)(cid:12)(cid:12)[C,p1,...,pn]
holds, and the latter restriction is determined by 3-point values Ω0,3(w1, w2, w3)
from repeated application of CohFT axiom (ii).
♦
A finite dimensional Q-algebra is semisimple if there exists a basis {ei} of
idempotents,
eiej = δijei ,
after an extension of scalars to C.
Definition 4 A CohFT with unit Ω = (Ωg,n)2g−2+n>0 is semisimple if (V, •, 1
)
¯
is a semisimple algebra.
6Since M0,3 is a point, we canonically identify H ∗(M0,3, Q)
∼
= Q, so Ω0,3(v1, v2, v3) ∈ Q.
6
0.5 Classification and calculation
The Givental-Teleman classification concerns semisimple CohFTs with unit.7
The form of the classification result is as follows: a semisimple CohFT with unit
Ω is uniquely determined by the following two structures:
• the topological part ω of Ω,
• an R-matrix
R(z) = Id + R1z + R2z2 + R3z3 + . . . , Rk ∈ End(V )
satisfying the symplectic property
R(z) · R⋆(−z) = Id ,
where ⋆ denotes the adjoint with respect to the metric η.
The precise statement of the Givental-Teleman classification will be discussed
in Section 1.
Via the Givental-Teleman classification, a semisimple CohFT with unit Ω
can be calculated in three steps:
(i) determine the ring (V, •, 1
) as explicitly as possible,
¯
(ii) find a closed formula for the topological part ω of Ω via Lemma 3,
(iii) calculate the R-matrix of the theory.
In the language of Gromov-Witten theory, step (i) is the determination of the
small quantum cohomology ring QH ∗(X, Q) via the 3-pointed genus 0 Gromov-
Witten invariants. Step (ii) is then to calculate the Gromov-Witten invariants
where the domain has a fixed complex structure of higher genus. New ideas are
often required for the leap to higher genus moduli in step (iii). Finding a closed
formula for the R-matrix requires a certain amount of luck.
Explaining how the above path to calculation plays out in three important
CohFTs is my goal here. The three theories are:
• Witten's class on the moduli of r-spin curves,
• the Chern character of the Verlinde bundle on the moduli of curves,
• the Gromov-Witten theory of the Hilbert scheme of points of C2.
While each theory has geometric interest and the calculations have consequences
in several directions, the focus of the paper will be on the CohFT determination.
The paths to calculation pursued here are applicable in many other cases.
7Semisimple CohFTs without unit are also covered, but we are interested here in the unital
case. Semisimplicity is an essential condition.
7
0.6 Past and future directions
The roots of the classification of semisimple CohFTs can be found in Givental's
analysis [16, 17, 22] of the torus localization formula [18] for the higher genus
Gromov-Witten theory of toric varieties. The three CohFTs treated here are
not directly accessible via the older torus localization methods. Givental's ap-
proach to the R-matrix via oscillating integrals (used often in the study of toric
geometries) is not covered in the paper.
Many interesting CohFTs are not semisimple. For example, the Gromov-
Witten theory of the famous Calabi-Yau quintic 3-fold,
X5 ⊂ P4 ,
does not define a semisimple CohFT. However, in the past year, an approach to
the quintic via the semisimple formal quintic theory [20, 23] appears possible.
These developments are not surveyed here.
0.7 Acknowledgments
Much of what I know about the Givental-Teleman classification was learned
through writing [22] with Y.-P. Lee and [32] with A. Pixton and D. Zvonkine.
For the study of the three CohFTs discussed in the paper, my collaborators
have been J. Bryan, F. Janda, A. Marian, A. Okounkov, D. Oprea, A. Pixton,
H.-H. Tseng, and D. Zvonkine. More specifically,
• Sections 1-2 are based on the papers [32, 33] and the Appendix of [33],
• Section 3 is based on the paper [24],
• Section 4 is based on the papers [6, 29] and especially [34].
Discussions with A. Givental, T. Graber, H. Lho, and Y. Ruan have played
an important role in my view of the subject.
I was partially supported by
SNF grant 200021-143274, ERC grant AdG-320368-MCSK, SwissMAP, and the
Einstein Stiftung.
1 Givental-Teleman classification
1.1 Stable graphs
The boundary strata of the moduli space of curves correspond to stable graphs
Γ = (V, H, L, g : V → Z≥0, v : H → V, i : H → H)
satisfying the following properties:
(i) V is a vertex set with a genus function g : V → Z≥0,
(ii) H is a half-edge set equipped with a vertex assignment v : H → V and an
involution i,
8
(iii) E, the edge set, is defined by the 2-cycles of i in H (self-edges at vertices
are permitted),
(iv) L, the set of legs, is defined by the fixed points of i and endowed with a
bijective correspondence with a set of markings,
(v) the pair (V, E) defines a connected graph,
(vi) for each vertex v, the stability condition holds:
2g(v) − 2 + n(v) > 0,
where n(v) is the valence of Γ at v including both half-edges and legs.
An automorphism of Γ consists of automorphisms of the sets V and H which
leave invariant the structures g, v, and i (and hence respect E and L). Let
Aut(Γ) denote the automorphism group of Γ.
The genus of a stable graph Γ is defined by:
g(Γ) =Xv∈V
g(v) + h1(Γ) .
Let Gg,n denote the set of all stable graphs (up to isomorphism) of genus g
with n legs. The strata8 of the moduli space Mg,n of Deligne-Mumford stable
curves are in bijective correspondence to Gg,n by considering the dual graph of
a generic pointed curve parameterized by the stratum.
To each stable graph Γ, we associate the moduli space
MΓ = Yv∈V
Mg(v),n(v) .
Let πv denote the projection from MΓ to Mg(v),n(v) associated to the vertex v.
There is a canonical morphism
with image9 equal to the boundary stratum associated to the graph Γ.
ιΓ : MΓ → Mg,n
(1)
1.2 R-matrix action
1.2.1 First action
Let Ω = (Ωg,n)2g−2+n>0 be a CohFT10 on the vector space (V, η). Let R be a
matrix series
R(z) =
Rkzk ∈ Id + z · End(V )[[z]]
∞Xk=0
8We consider here the standard stratification by topological type of the pointed curve
9 The degree of ιΓ is Aut(Γ).
10Ω is not assumed here to be unital – only CohFT axioms (i) and (ii) are imposed.
9
which satisfies the symplectic condition
R(z) · R⋆(−z) = Id .
We define a new CohFT RΩ on the vector space (V, η) by summing over stable
graphs Γ with summands given by a product of vertex, edge, and leg contribu-
tions,
(RΩ)g,n = XΓ∈Gg,n
1
Aut (Γ)
where
ιΓ⋆Yv∈V
Cont(v)Ye∈E
Cont(e)Yl∈ L
Cont(l) ,
(2)
(i) the vertex contribution is
Cont(v) = Ωg(v),n(v),
where g(v) and n(v) denote the genus and number of half-edges and legs
of the vertex,
(ii) the leg contribution is the End(V )-valued cohomology class
Cont(l) = R(ψl) ,
where ψl ∈ H 2(Mg(v),n(v), Q) is the cotangent class at the marking corre-
sponding to the leg,
(iii) the edge contribution is
Cont(e) =
η−1 − R(ψ′
ψ′
e)η−1R(ψ′′
e + ψ′′
e
e )⊤
,
e and ψ′′
where ψ′
e are the cotangent classes at the node which represents the
edge e. The symplectic condition guarantees that the edge contribution is
well-defined.
We clarify the meaning of the edge contribution (iii),
Cont(e) ∈ V ⊗2 ⊗ H ⋆(Mg′,n′ ) ⊗ H ⋆(Mg′′,n′′),
where (g′, n′) and (g′′, n′′) are the labels of the vertices adjacent to the edge e
by writing the formula explicitly in coordinates.
Let {eµ} be a Q-basis of V . The components of the R-matrix in the basis
are Rν
µ(z),
R(z)(eµ) =Xν
Rν
µ(z) · eν .
The components of Cont(e) are
Cont(e)µν =
ηµν −Pρ,σ Rµ
ρ (ψ′
ψ′
e + ψ′′
e
e) · ηρσ · Rν
σ(ψ′′
e )
∈ H ⋆(Mg′,n′ ) ⊗ H ⋆(Mg′′,n′′).
10
The fraction
ηµν −Pρ,σ Rµ
ρ (z) · ηρσ · Rν
z + w
σ(w)
is a power series in z and w since the numerator vanishes when z = −w as a
consequence of the symplectic condition which, in coordinates, takes the form
Rµ
ρ (z) · ηρσ · Rν
σ(−z) = ηµν .
Xρ,σ
The substitution z = ψ′
e and w = ψ′′
e is therefore unambiguously defined.
Definition 5 Let RΩ be the CohFT obtained from Ω by the R-action (2).
The above R-action was first defined11 on Gromov-Witten potentials by
Givental [16]. An abbreviated treatment of the lift to CohFTs appears in pa-
pers by Teleman [38] and Shadrin [37]. A careful proof that RΩ satisfies CohFT
axioms (i) and (ii) can be found in [32, Section 2].
If Ω is a CohFT with unit on (V, η, 1
¯
To handle the unit, a second action is required.
), then RΩ may not respect the unit 1
¯
.
1.2.2 Second action
A second action on the CohFT12 Ω on (V, η) is given by translations. Let
T ∈ V [[z]] be a series with no terms of degree 0 or 1,
T (z) = T2z2 + T3z3 + . . . ,
Tk ∈ V .
Definition 6 Let T Ω be the CohFT obtained from Ω by the formula
(T Ω)g,n(v1, . . . , vn) =
∞Xm=0
1
m!
pm⋆(cid:16)Ωg,n+m(v1, . . . , vn, T (ψn+1), . . . , T (ψn+m))(cid:17) ,
where pm : Mg,n+m → Mg,n is the morphism forgetting the last m markings.
The right side of the formula in Definition 6 is a formal expansion by dis-
tributing the powers of the ψ classes as follows:
Ωg,n+m(· · · , T (ψ•), · · · ) =
ψk
• · Ωg,n+m(· · · , Tk, · · · ) .
∞Xk=2
The summation is finite because T has no terms of degree 0 or 1.
11To simplify our formulas, we have changed Givental's and Teleman's conventions by re-
placing R with R−1. Equation (2) above then determines a right group action on CohFTs
rather than a left group action as in Givental's and Teleman's papers.
12To define the translation action, Ω is required only to be CohFT and not necessarily a
CohFT with unit.
11
1.3 Reconstruction
We can now state the Givental-Teleman classification result [38]. Let Ω be a
semisimple CohFT with unit on (V, η, 1
), and let ω be the topological part of
¯
Ω. For a symplectic matrix R, define
R.ω = R(T (ω)) with T (z) = z((Id − R(z)) · 1
¯
) ∈ V [[z]] .
). The Givental-
By [32, Proposition 2.12], R.ω is a CohFT with unit on (V, η, 1
¯
Teleman classification asserts the existence of a unique R-matrix which exactly
recovers Ω.
Theorem 7 There exists a unique symplectic matrix
R ∈ Id + z · End(V )[[z]]
which reconstructs Ω from ω,
Ω = R.ω ,
as a CohFT with unit.
The first example concerns the total Chern class CohFT of Section 0.3,
V = Q , η(1, 1) = 1 , 1
¯
= 1 , Ωg,n(1, . . . , 1) = c(E) ∈ H ∗(Mg,n, Q) .
The topological part is the trivial CohFT, and the R-matrix is
R(z) = exp −
∞Xk=1
B2k
(2k)(2k − 1)
z2k−1! .
That the above R-matrix reconstructs the total Chern class CohFT is a con-
sequence of Mumford's calculation [27] of the Chern character of the Hodge
bundle by Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch.
1.4 Chow field theories
Let (V, η, 1
¯
a distinguished element. Let Ω = (Ωg,n)2g−2+n>0 be a system of tensors
) be a Q-vector space with a non-degenerate symmetric 2-form and
Ωg,n ∈ A∗(Mg,n, Q) ⊗ (V ∗)⊗n
where A∗ is the Chow group of algebraic cycles modulo rational equivalence.
In order to define a Chow field theory, the system Ω must satisfy the CohFT
axioms of Section 0.3 with cohomology H ∗ replaced everywhere by Chow A∗.
Definition 8 A system Ω = (Ωg,n)2g−2+n>0 of elements
Ωg,n ∈ A∗(Mg,n, Q) ⊗ (V ∗)⊗n
satisfying (i) and (ii) is a Chow field theory or a ChowFT. If (iii) is also
satisfied, Ω is a ChowFT with unit.
12
For ChowFTs, the quantum product (V, •, 1
) and semisimplicity are defined
¯
just as for CohFTs. The R- and T -actions of Sections 1.2 also lift immediately
to ChowFTs. However, the classification of semisimple ChowFTs is an open
question.
Question 9 Does the Givental-Teleman classification of Theorem 7 hold for a
semisimple Chow field theory Ω with unit?
2 Witten's r-spin class
2.1
r-spin CohFT
Let r ≥ 2 be an integer. Let (Vr, η, 1
) be the following triple:
¯
• Vr is an (r − 1)-dimensional Q-vector space with basis e0, . . . , er−2,
• η is the non-degenerate symmetric 2-form
ηab = hea, ebi = δa+b,r−2 ,
= e0.
• 1
¯
Witten's r-spin theory provides a family of classes
W r
g,n(a1, . . . , an) ∈ H ∗(Mg,n, Q)
for a1, . . . , an ∈ {0, . . . , r − 2} which define a CohFT Wr = (Wr
g,n)2g−2+n>0 by
Wr
g,n : V ⊗n
r → H ∗(Mg,n, Q) , Wr
g,n(ea1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ ean) = W r
g,n(a1, . . . , an) .
The class W r
g,n(a1, . . . , an) has (complex) degree13
degC W r
g,n(a1, . . . , an) = Dr
g,n(a1, . . . , an)
(r − 2)(g − 1) +Pn
r
i=1 ai
=
(3)
.
If Dr
g,n(a1, . . . , an) is not an integer, the corresponding Witten's class vanishes.
The construction of W r
0,n(a1, . . . , an) in genus 0 was carried out by Wit-
r
ten [42] using r-spin structures. Let M
0,n(a1, . . . , an) be the Deligne-Mumford
moduli space parameterizing rth roots,
L⊗r ∼= ωC(cid:16) −
nXi=1
aipi(cid:17) where
[C, p1, . . . , pn] ∈ M0,n .
The class 1
top Chern class of the bundle on M
r W r
0,n(a1, . . . , an) is defined to be the push-forward to M0,n of the
r
0,n(a1, . . . , an) with fiber H 1(C, L)∗.
13So W r
g,n(a1, . . . , an) ∈ H 2·Dr
g,n (a1,...,an)(Mg,n, Q).
13
The existence of Witten's class in higher genus is both remarkable and highly
non-trivial. Polishchuk and Vaintrob [35, 36] constructed
W r
g,n(a1, . . . , an) ∈ A∗(Mg,n, Q)
as an algebraic cycle class and proved and the CohFT axioms (i-iii) for a Chow
field theory hold. The algebraic approach was later simplified in [7, 8]. Analytic
constructions appear in [13, 26].
2.2 Genus 0
2.2.1 3 and 4 markings
Witten [42] determined the following initial conditions in genus 0 with n = 3, 4:
ZM0,3
W r
0,3(a1, a2, a3) =(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)
ZM0,4
W r
1
0
if a1 + a2 + a3 = r − 2 ,
otherwise,
(4)
0,4(1, 1, r − 2, r − 2) =
1
r
.
Uniqueness of the r-spin CohFT in genus 0 follows easily from the initial con-
ditions (4) and the axioms of a CohFT with unit.
The genus 0 sector of the CohFT Wr defines a quantum product14 • on Vr.
The resulting algebra (Vr, •, 1
), even after extension to C, is not semisimple.
¯
Therefore, the Givental-Teleman classification can not be directly applied.
2.2.2 Witten's r-spin class and representations of sl2(C).
Consider the Lie algebra sl2 = sl2(C). Denote by ρk the kth symmetric power
of the standard 2-dimensional representation of sl2,
ρk = Symk(ρ1) ,
dim ρk = k + 1 .
The following complete solution of the genus 0 part of the CohFT Wr (after
integration) was found by Pixton, see [33] for a proof.
Theorem 10 Let a = (a1, . . . , an≥3) with ai ∈ {0, . . . , r − 2} satisfy the degree
constraint Dr
0,n(a) = n − 3. Then,
ZM0,n
W r
0,n(a) =
(n − 3)!
rn−3 dimhρr−2−a1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ ρr−2−anisl2
,
where the superscript sl2 denotes the sl2-invariant subspace.
14See Section 0.4.
14
2.2.3 Shifted Witten class
Definition 11 For γ ∈ Vr, the shifted r-spin CohFT Wr,γ is defined by
Wr,γ
g,n(v1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ vn) = Xm≥0
1
m!
pm⋆ Wr
g,n+m(v1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ vn ⊗ γ⊗m),
where pm : Mg,n+m → Mg,n is the map forgetting the last m markings.
Using degree formula Dr
g,n, the summation in the definition of the shift is easily
seen to be finite. The shifted Witten class Wr,γ determines a CohFT with unit,
see [32, Section 1.1].
) by the shift
Definition 12 Define the CohFT bWr with unit on (Vr, η, 1
bWr = Wr,(0,...,0,r)
along the special vector rer−2 ∈ Vr. Let (Vr,b•, 1
by the quantum product defined by bWr.
¯
¯
The Verlinde algebra of level r for sl2 is spanned by the weights of sl2 from 0
to r − 2. The coefficient of c in the product a • b is equal to the dimension of the
sl2-invariant subspace of the representation ρa ⊗ ρb ⊗ ρc provided the inequality
) be the Q-algebra determined
a + b + c ≤ 2r − 4
is satisfied. Using Theorem 10 for the integral r-spin theory in genus 0, the
following basic result is proven in [33].
¯
level r for sl2.
) is isomorphic to the Verlinde algebra of
Since the Verlinde algebra is well-known to be semisimple15, the Givental-
Theorem 13 The algebra (Vr,b•, 1
Teleman classification of Theorem 7 can be applied to the CohFT bWr. Us-
g,n(a1, . . . , an) part of bWr equals Wr,
ing the degree formula (3) and Definition 12, we see the (complex) degree
Dr
g,n(a1,...,an)
= Wr
g,n(a1, . . . , an) .
hbWr
g,n(a1, . . . , an)iDr
Hence, a complete computation of bWr also provides a computation of Wr.
2.3 The topological field theory
After the studying genus 0 theory, we turn our attention to the topological part
bωr of bWr. The following two results of [33] provide a complete calculation.
15An explicit normalized idempotent basis is given in Proposition 14 below.
15
(cid:19) ea,
vkb• vl = pr/2
sin( kπ
r )
vk δk,l .
forward by Lemma 3 and elementary trigonometric identities.
Once the normalized idempotents are found, the computation ofbωr is straight-
Proposition 15 For a1, . . . , an ∈ {0, . . . , r − 2}, we have
g,n(ea1 , . . . , ean ) =(cid:16) r
bωr
2(cid:17)g−1 r−1Xk=1
(−1)(k−1)(g−1)
sin(cid:16) (ai+1)kπ
r
nQi=1
(cid:0)sin( kπ
r )(cid:1)2g−2+n
(cid:17)
.
ical identification
In Proposition 15, the CohFTbωr is viewed as taking values in Q via the canon-
H 0(Mg,n, Q) ∼= Q .
2.4 The R-matrix
The last (and often hardest) step in the computation of a semisimple CohFT via
the Givental-Teleman classification is to find the unique R-matrix. Remarkably,
there exists a closed formula in hypergeometric series for the R-matrix of the
shift rer−2 is (up to scale) the only shift of Wr for which closed formulas for the
R-matrix are known.
CohFT bWr. The precise shift in Definition 12 of the CohFT bWr is crucial: the
at the shift rer−2. The operator of quantum multiplicationb• by the Euler field
The method of finding the unique R-matrix for Wr uses the Euler field er−2
in the basis e0, . . . , er−2 is
0
· · ·
· · ·
0
2
Proposition 14 The basis of normalized idempotents of (Vr,b•, 1
¯
vk =r 2
r
sin(cid:18) (a + 1)kπ
r
r−2Xa=0
k ∈ {1, . . . , r − 1} .
) is given by
More precisely, we have
η(vk, vl) = (−1)k−1δk,l ,
ξ =
.
0
.
.
.
0
2
0
2
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2
0
0
· · ·
· · ·
0
.
.
.
0
0
16
In the same frame, the shifted degree operator is
−(r − 2)
0
· · ·
· · ·
µ =
1
2r
0
.
.
.
0
0
−(r − 4)
0
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
0
r − 4
· · ·
· · ·
0
r − 2
0
0
.
.
.
0
.
Since bWr has an Euler field with an associated degree operator, the unique
R-matrix for the classification is given by the solution of
[Rm+1, ξ] = (m − µ)Rm
(5)
with the initial condition R0 = Id, see [38].
Definition 16 For each integer a ∈ {0, . . . , r − 2}, define the hypergeometric
series
Br,a(z) =
∞Xm=0" mYi=1(cid:0)(2i − 1)r − 2(a + 1)(cid:1)(cid:0)(2i − 1)r + 2(a + 1)(cid:1)
i
#(cid:16)−
z
16r2(cid:17)m
.
Let Beven
r,a and Bodd
r,a the even and odd summands16 of the series Br,a.
surprisingly simple form.
The unique solution to (5) is computed in [33]. The R-matrix of bWr has a
Theorem 17 The unique R-matrix classifying bWr has coefficients
a ∈ {0, . . . , r − 2}
a = Beven
r,a (z) ,
Ra
on the main diagonal, and
Rr−2−a
a
= Bodd
r,a (z) ,
a ∈ {0, . . . , r − 2}
on the antidiagonal (if r is even, the coefficient at the intersection of both diag-
onals is 1), and 0 everywhere else.
In case r = 2, the matrix is trivial R(z) = Id. For r = 3 and 4 respectively,
the R-matrices17 are
Bodd
R(z) =(cid:18)Beven
R(z) =
4,0 (z)
0
Bodd
4,0 (z)
Beven
3,0 (z) Bodd
3,0 (z) Beven
3,1 (z)
3,1 (z)(cid:19) ,
4,2 (z)
0 Bodd
1
0
4,2 (z)
0
Beven
.
17
16The even summand consists of all the even powers of z (and likewise for the odd summand).
17R here is R−1 in [32, 33] because of a change of conventions.
2.5 Calculation of Wr
The analysis of Sections 2.2-2.4 together complete the calculation of bWr,
in exactly the steps (i)-(iii) proposed in Section 0.5 of the Introduction. Then,
as we have seen,
bWr = R.bωr ,
g,n(a1, . . . , an)iDr
g,n(a1,...,an)
.
Wr
g,n(a1, . . . , an) =hbWr
The calculation has an immediate consequence [33].
Corollary 18 Witten's r-spin class on Mg,n lies in the tautological ring (in
cohomology),
W r
g,n(a1, . . . , an) ∈ RH ∗(Mg,n, Q) .
We refer the reader to [31] for a discussion of tautological classes on the mod-
uli space of curves. In fact, the first proof of Pixton's relations in RH ∗(Mg,n, Q)
was obtained via the calculation of bW3 in [32].
2.6 Questions
Whether Corollary 18 also holds in Chow is an interesting question: is
W r
g,n(a1, . . . , an) ∈ R∗(Mg,n, Q) ?
(6)
A positive answer to Question 9 about the classification of Chow field theories
would imply a positive answer here. The following question may be viewed as
a refinement of (6).
Question 19 Find a formula in algebraic cycles for Witten's r-spin class on
r
M
g,n(a1, . . . , an) before push-forward to Mg,n.
Another open direction concerns the moduli spaces of holomorphic differen-
tials [1, 14]. Let (a1, . . . , an) be a partition of 2g − 2 with non-negative parts.
Let
Hg(a1, . . . , an) ⊂ Mg,n
be the closure of the locus of moduli points
[C, p1, . . . , pn] ∈ Mg,n where ωC
∼= OC(cid:16) nXi=1
aipi(cid:17) .
For r − 2 ≥ Max{a1, . . . , an}, Witten's r-spin class W r
defined and of degree independent of r,
g,n(a1, . . . , an) is well-
Dr
g,n(a1, . . . , an) =
(r − 2)(g − 1) +Pn
r
i=1 ai
= g − 1 .
By [33, Theorem 7], after scaling by rg−1,
Wg,n(a1, . . . , an)[r] = rg−1 · W r
g,n(a1, . . . , an) ∈ RH g−1(Mg,n, Q)
is a polynomial in r for all sufficiently large r.
18
Question 20 Prove the following conjecture of [33, Appendix]:
(−1)gWg,n(a1, . . . , an)[0] = [Hg(a1, . . . , an)] ∈ H 2(g−1)(Mg,n, Q) .
3 Chern character of the Verlinde bundle
3.1 Verlinde CohFT
Let G be a complex, simple, simply connected Lie group with Lie algebra g. Fix
an integer level ℓ > 0. Let (Vℓ, η, 1
) be the following triple:
¯
• Vℓ is the Q-vector space with basis indexed by the irreducible representa-
tions of g at level ℓ,
• η is the non-degenerate symmetric 2-form
where ν⋆ denotes the dual representation,
η(µ, ν) = δµ,ν ⋆
is the basis element corresponding to the trivial representation.
• 1
¯
Let µ1, . . . , µn be n irreducible representations of g at level ℓ. A vector
bundle
Vg(µ1, . . . , µn) → Mg,n
is constructed in [41]. Over nonsingular curves, the fibers of Vg(µ1, . . . , µn)
are the spaces of non-abelian theta functions – spaces of global sections of the
determinant line bundles over the moduli of parabolic G-bundles. To extend
Vg(µ1, . . . , µn) over the boundary
∂Mg,n ⊂ Mg,n ,
the theory of conformal blocks is required [41]. The vector bundle Vg(µ1, . . . , µn)
has various names in the literature: the Verlinde bundle, the bundle of conformal
blocks, and the bundle of vacua. A study in genus 0 and 1 can be found in [12].
A CohFT Ωℓ is defined via the Chern character18 of the Verlinde bundle:
Ωℓ
g,n(µ1, . . . , µn) = cht(Vg(µ1, . . . , µn)) ∈ H ⋆(Mg,n, Q) .
CohFT axiom (i) for Ωℓ is trivial. Axiom (ii) follows from the fusion rules [41].
Axiom (iii) for the unit 1
¯
is the propagation of vacua [12, Proposition 2.4(i)].
18For a vector bundle V with Chern roots r1, . . . , rk,
cht(V) =
k
X
j=1
etrj .
The parameter t may be treated either as a formal variable, in which case the CohFT is
defined over the ring Q[[t]] instead of Q, or as a rational number t ∈ Q.
19
3.2 Genus 0 and the topological part
Since the variable t carries the degree grading, the topological part ωℓ of Ωℓ is
obtained by setting t = 0,
ωℓ
g,n = Ωℓ
.
g,n(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)t=0
The result is the just the rank of the Verlinde bundle,
ωℓ
g,n(µ1, . . . , µn) = rk Vg(µ1, . . . , µn) = dg(µ1, . . . , µn) .
With the quantum product obtained19 from ωℓ, (Vℓ, •, 1
) is the fusion algebra.
¯
Since the fusion algebra is well-known20 to be semisimple, the CohFT with
unit Ωℓ is also semisimple, The subject has a history starting in the mid 80s
with the discovery and in 90s with several proofs of the Verlinde formula for the
rank dg(µ1, . . . , µn), see [2] for an overview.
Hence, steps (i) and (ii) of the computational strategy of Section 0.5 for Ωℓ
are complete (and have been for many years). Step (iii) is the jump to moduli.
3.3 Path to the R-matrix
The shifted r-spin CohFT bWr has an Euler field obtained from the pure dimen-
sionality of Witten's r-spin class which was used to find the unique R-matrix in
Section 2. The CohFT Ωℓ is not of pure dimension and has no Euler field. A
different path to the R-matrix is required here.
The restriction of the tensor Ωℓ
g,n to the open set of nonsingular curves
Mg,n ⊂ Mg,n
forgets a lot of the data of the CohFT. However, by [24, Lemma 2.2], the
restriction is enough to uniquely determine the R-matrix of Ωℓ. Fortunately,
the restriction is calculable in closed form:
• the first Chern class of the Verlinde bundle over Mg,n is found in [40],
• the existence of a projectively flat connection21 [41] on the Verlinde bundle
over Mg,n then determines the full Chern character over Mg,n.
As should be expected, the computation of Ωℓ relies significantly upon the past
study of the Verlinde bundles.
3.4 The R-matrix
For a simple Lie algebra g and a level ℓ, the conformal anomaly is
c = c(g, ℓ) =
ℓ dim g
h + ℓ
,
19Since the quantum product depends only upon the tensors of genus 0 with 3 markings,
the quantum products of Ωℓ and ωℓ are equal.
20See, for example, [2, Proposition 6.1].
21Often called the Hitchin connection.
20
where h is the dual Coxeter number. For each representation with highest weight
µ of level ℓ, define
w(µ) =
(µ, µ + 2ρ)
2(h + ℓ)
.
Here, ρ is half of the sum of the positive roots, and the Cartan-Killing form (, )
is normalized so that the longest root θ satisfies
(θ, θ) = 2.
Example 21 For g = sl(r, C), the highest weight of a representation of level ℓ
is given by an r-tuple of integers
µ = (µ1, . . . , µr) , ℓ ≥ µ1 ≥ · · · ≥ µr ≥ 0 ,
defined up to shifting the vector components by the same integer. Furthermore,
we have
w(µ) =
1
2(ℓ + r)
c(g, ℓ) =
ℓ(r2 − 1)
,
ℓ + r
(µi)2 −
rXi=1
1
r rXi=1
µi!2
+
rXi=1
(r − 2i + 1)µi .
Via the path to the R-matrix discussed in Section 3.3, a simple closed form
for the R-matrix of Ωℓ is found in [24] using the constants c(g, ℓ) and w(µ) from
representation theory.
Theorem 22 The CohFT Ωℓ is reconstructed from the topological part ωℓ by
the diagonal R-matrix
R(z)µ
µ = exp(cid:18)tz ·(cid:18)−w(µ) +
c(g, ℓ)
24 (cid:19)(cid:19) .
For the Lie algebra g = sl2 at level ℓ = 1, there are only two representations
{∅, (cid:3)} to consider22,
c(sl2, 1) = 1, w(∅) = 0, w((cid:3)) =
1
4
.
As an example of the reconstruction result of Theorem 22,
the total Chern character ch Vg((cid:3), . . . , (cid:3)) at t = 1 is
Ωℓ = R.ωℓ ,
exp(cid:18)−
λ1
2 (cid:19) · XΓ∈Geven
g,n
2g−h1(Γ)
Aut(Γ)
· ιΓ⋆Ye∈E
1 − exp(cid:0)− 1
4 (ψ′
e + ψ′′
e
ψ′
e + ψ′′
e )(cid:1)
·Yl∈ L
e−ψl/4
in H ∗(Mg,n, Q). A few remarks about the above formula are required:
22Here, ∅ is the trivial representation (corresponding to 1
¯
tation.
) and (cid:3) is the standard represen-
21
• The classes λ1 and ψ are the first Chern classes of the Hodge bundle and
the cotangent line bundle respectively.
• The sum is over the set of even stable graphs,
Geven
g,n ⊂ Gg,n ,
defined by requiring the valence n(v) to be even for every vertex v of the
graph.
• The Verlinde rank dg(v)((cid:3), . . . , (cid:3)) with n(v) insertions equals 2g in the
even case, see [2]. The product of 2g(v) over the vertices of Γ yields
2g−h1(Γ), where h1 denotes the first Betti number.
3.5 Questions
A different approach to the calculation of the Chern character of the Verlinde
bundle in the sl2 case (for every level) was pursued in [11] using the geometry
introduced by Thaddeus [39] to prove the Verlinde formula. The outcome of [11]
is a more difficult calculation (with a much more complex answer), but with one
advantage: the projective flatness of the Hitchin connection over Mg,n is not
used. When the flatness is introduced, the method of [11] yields tautological
relations. Unfortunately, no such relations are obtained by the above R-matrix
calculation of Ωℓ since the projective flatness is an input.
Question 23 Is there an alternative computation of Ωℓ which does not use the
projective flatness of the Hitchin connection and which systematically produces
tautological relations in RH ∗(Mg,n, Q)?
Of course, if the answer to Question 23 is yes, then the next question is
whether all tautological relations are produced.23
4 Gromov-Witten theory of Hilbm(C2)
4.1 T-equivariant cohomology of Hilbm(C2)
The Hilbert scheme Hilbm(C2) of m points in the plane C2 parameterizes ideals
I ⊂ C[x, y] of colength m,
dimC C[x, y]/I = m .
The Hilbert scheme Hilbm(C2) is a nonsingular, irreducible, quasi-projective
variety of dimension 2m, see [28] for an introduction. An open dense set of
Hilbm(C2) parameterizes ideals associated to configurations of m distinct points.
The symmetries of C2 lift to the Hilbert scheme. The algebraic torus
23I first heard an early version of this question from R. Bott at Harvard in the 90s.
T = (C∗)2
22
acts diagonally on C2 by scaling coordinates,
(z1, z2) · (x, y) = (z1x, z2y) .
We review the Fock space description of the T-equivariant cohomology of the
Hilbert scheme of points of C2 following the notation of [29, Section 2.1].
By definition, the Fock space F is freely generated over Q by commuting cre-
ation operators α−k, k ∈ Z>0, acting on the vacuum vector v∅. The annihilation
operators αk, k ∈ Z>0, kill the vacuum
αk · v∅ = 0,
k > 0 ,
and satisfy the commutation relations [αk, αl] = k δk+l.
A natural basis of F is given by the vectors
µi =
α−µi v∅
(7)
1
z(µ) Yi
indexed by partitions µ. Here, z(µ) = Aut(µ)Qi µi is the usual normalization
factor. Let the length ℓ(µ) denote the number of parts of the partition µ.
The Nakajima basis defines a canonical isomorphism,
F ⊗Q Q[t1, t2] ∼=Mn≥0
H ∗
T(Hilbm(C2), Q).
(8)
The Nakajima basis element corresponding to µi is
1
Πiµi
[Vµ]
where [Vµ] is (the cohomological dual of) the class of the subvariety of Hilbµ(C2)
with generic element given by a union of schemes of lengths
µ1, . . . , µℓ(µ)
supported at ℓ(µ) distinct points24 of C2. The vacuum vector v∅ corresponds
to the unit in
1 ∈ H ∗
T(Hilb0(C2), Q) .
The variables t1 and t2 are the equivariant parameters corresponding to the
weights of the T-action on the tangent space Tan0(C2) at the origin of C2.
The subspace Fm ⊂ F ⊗Q Q[t1, t2] corresponding to H ∗
T(Hilbm(C2), Q) is
spanned by the vectors (7) with µ = n. The subspace can also be described as
the n-eigenspace of the energy operator:
· =Xk>0
α−k αk .
24The points and parts of µ are considered here to be unordered.
23
The vector 1ni corresponds to the unit
1 ∈ H ∗
T(Hilbm(C2), Q) .
The standard inner product on the T-equivariant cohomology of Hilbm(C2)
induces the following nonstandard inner product on Fock space after an exten-
sion of scalars:
hµνi =
.
(9)
(−1)µ−ℓ(µ)
(t1t2)ℓ(µ)
δµν
z(µ)
4.2 Gromov-Witten CohFT of Hilbm(C2)
Let m > 0 be a colength. Let (Vm, η, 1
¯
) be the following triple:
• Vm is the free Q(t1, t2)[[q]]-module Fm ⊗Q[t1,t2] Q(t1, t2)[[q]],
• η is the non-degenerate symmetric 2-form (9),
is the basis element 1ni.
• 1
¯
Since Hilbm(C2) is not proper, the Gromov-Witten theory is only defined
after localization by T. The CohFT with unit
ΩHilbm(C2) = (ΩHilbm(C2)
g,n
)2g−2+n>0
is defined via the localized T-equivariant Gromov-Witten classes of Hilbm(C2),
ΩHilbm(C2)
g,n
∈ H ∗(Mg,n, Q(t1, t2)[[q]]) ⊗ (V ∗
m)n .
Here, q is the Novikov parameter. Curves of degree d are counted with weight
qd, where the curve degree is defined by the pairing with the divisor
D = −(cid:12)(cid:12)2, 1m−2(cid:11) ,
d =Zβ
D .
Formally, ΩHilbm(C2) is a CohFT not over the field Q as in the r-spin and
Verlinde cases, but over the ring Q(t1, t2)[[q]]. To simplify notation, let
Ωm = ΩHilbm(C2) .
4.3 Genus 0
Since the T-action on Hilbm(C2) has finitely many T-fixed points, the localized
T-equivariant cohomology
H ∗
T(Hilbm(C2), Q) ⊗Q[t1,t2] Q(t1, t2)
is semisimple. At q = 0, the quantum cohomology ring,
(Vm, •, 1
) ,
¯
24
(10)
defined by Ωm specializes to the localized T-equivariant cohomology of Hilbm(C2).
Hence, the quantum cohomology (10) is semisimple over the ring Q(t1, t2)[[q]],
see [22].
Let MD denote the operator of T-equivariant quantum multiplication by the
divisor D. A central result of [29] is the following explicit formula for MD an as
operator on Fock space:
MD(q, t1, t2) = (t1 + t2)Xk>0
k
2
(−q)k + 1
(−q)k − 1
α−k αk −
t1 + t2
2
(−q) + 1
(−q) − 1
·
+
1
2 Xk,l>0ht1t2 αk+l α−k α−l − α−k−l αk αli .
The q-dependence of MD occurs only in the first two terms (which act diagonally
in the basis (7)).
Let µ1 and µ2 be partitions of m. The T-equivariant Gromov-Witten in-
variants of Hilbm(C2) in genus 0 with 3 cohomology insertions given (in the
Nakajima basis) by µ1, D, and µ2 are determined by MD:
∞Xd=0
Ωm
0,3,d(µ1, D, µ2) qd = (cid:10)µ1(cid:12)(cid:12) MD(cid:12)(cid:12) µ2(cid:11) .
The following result is proven in [29].
Theorem 24 The restriction of Ωm to genus 0 is uniquely and effectively de-
termined from the calculation of MD.
While Theorem 24 in principle completes the genus 0 study of Ωm, the result
is not as strong as the genus 0 determinations in the r-spin and Verlinde cases.
The proof of Theorem 24 provides an effective linear algebraic procedure, but
not a formula, for calculating the genus 0 part of Ωm from MD.
4.4 The topological part
Let ωm be the topological part of the CohFT with unit Ωm. A closed formula
for ωm can not be expected since closed formulas are already missing in the
genus 0 study.
The CohFT with unit ωm has been considered earlier from another per-
spective. Using fundamental correspondences [25], ωm is equivalent to the local
GW/DT theory of 3-folds of the form
C2 × C ,
(11)
where C is a curve or arbitrary genus. Such local theories have been studied
extensively [6] in the investigation of the GW/DT theory of 3-folds25.
25 A natural generalization of the geometry (11) is to consider the 3-fold total space,
L1 ⊕ L2 → C ,
25
4.5 The R-matrix
Since Ωm is not of pure dimension (and does not carry an Euler field), the
R-matrix is not determined by the T-equivariant genus 0 theory alone. As in
the Verlinde case, a different method is required. Fortunately, together with
the divisor equation, an evaluation of the T-equivariant higher genus theory in
degree 0 is enough to uniquely determine the R-matrix.
Let Part(m) be the set of of partitions of m corresponding to the T-fixed
points of Hilbm(C2). For each η ∈ Part(m), let Tanη(Hilbm(C2)) be the T-
representation on the tangent space at the T-fixed point corresponding to η. As
before, let
be the Hodge bundle. The follow result is proven in [34].
E → Mg,n
Theorem 25 The R-matrix of Ωm is uniquely determined by the divisor equa-
tion and the degree 0 invariants
1,0
(cid:10)µ(cid:11)Hilbm(C2)
(cid:10)(cid:11)Hilbm(C2)
g≥2,0
µηZM1,1
= Xη∈Part(m)
= Xη∈Part(m)ZMg
e(cid:0)E∗ ⊗ Tanη(Hilbm(C2))(cid:1)
e (Tanη(Hilbm(C2)))
,
e(cid:0)E∗ ⊗ Tanη(Hilbm(C2))(cid:1)
e (Tanη(Hilbm(C2)))
.
While Theorem 25 is weaker than the explicit R-matrix solutions in the r-
spin and Verlinde cases, the result nevertheless has several consequences. The
first is a rationality result [34].
Theorem 26 For all genera g ≥ 0 and µ1, . . . , µn ∈ Part(m), the series26
ZMg,n
Ωm
g,n(µ1, . . . , µn) ∈ Q(t1, t2)[[q]]
is the Taylor expansion in q of a rational function in Q(t1, t1, q).
The statement of Theorem 26 can be strengthened (with an R-matrix argu-
ment using Theorem 25) to prove that the CohFT with unit Ωm can be defined
over the field Q(t1, t2, q).
4.6 Crepant resolution
The Hilbert scheme of points of C2 is well-known to be a crepant resolution of
the symmetric product,
ǫ : Hilbm(C2) → Symm(C2) = (C2)m/Sm .
of a sum of line bundles L1, L2 → C. For particular pairs L1 and L2, simple closed form
solutions were found [6] and have later played a role in the study of the structure of the
Gromov-Witten theory of Calabi-Yau 3-folds by Ionel and Parker [19].
26As always, g and n are required to be in the stable range 2g − 2 + n > 0.
26
Viewed as an orbifold, the symmetric product Symm(C2) has a T-equivariant
Gromov-Witten theory with insertions indexed by partitions of m and an asso-
ciated CohFT with unit ΩSymm(C2) determined by the Gromov-Witten classes.
The CohFT ΩSymm(C2) is defined over the ring Q(t1, t2)[[u]], where u is variable
associated to the free ramification points, see [34] for a detailed treatment.
In genus 0, the equivalence of the T-equivariant Gromov-Witten theories of
Hilbm(C2) and the orbifold Symm(C2) was proven27 in [5]. Another consequence
of the R-matrix study of ΩHilbm(C2) is the proof in [34] of the crepant resolution
conjecture here.
Theorem 27 For all genera g ≥ 0 and µ1, . . . , µn ∈ Part(m), we have
ΩHilbm(C2)
g,n
(µ1, . . . , µn) = (−i)Pn
i=1 ℓ(µi)−µi ΩSymm(C2)
g,n
(µ1, . . . , µn)
after the variable change −q = eiu.
The variable change of Theorem 27 is well-defined by the rationality of The-
orem 26. The analysis [30] of the quantum differential equation of Hilbm(C2)
plays an important role in the proof. Theorem 27 is closely related to the
GW/DT correspondence for local curves (11) in families, see [34].
4.7 Questions
The most basic open question is to find an expression for the R-matrix of Ωm
in terms of natural operators on Fock space.
Question 28 Is there a representation theoretic formula for the R-matrix of
the CohFT with unit Ωm?
The difficulty in attacking Question 28 starts with the lack of higher genus
calculations in closed form. The first nontrivial example [34] occurs in genus 1
for the Hilbert scheme of 2 points:
ZM1,1
ΩHilb2(C2)
1,1
(cid:0)(2)(cid:1) = −
1
24
(t1 + t2)2
t1t2
·
1 + q
1 − q
.
(12)
While there are numerous calculations to do, the higher m analogue of (12)
surely has a simple answer.
Question 29 Calculate the series
ZM1,1
ΩHilbm(C2)
1,1
(cid:0)(2, 1n−2)(cid:1) ∈ Q(t1, t2, q) ,
in closed form for all m.
27The prefactor (−i)Pn
i=1 ℓ(µi)−µi was treated incorrectly in [5] because of an arthimetical
error. The prefactor here is correct.
27
References
[1] M. Bainbridge, D. Chen, Q. Gendron, S. Grushevsky, and M. Moeller,
Compactification of strata of abelian differentials, arXiv:1604.08834.
[2] A. Beauville, Conformal blocks, fusion rules, and the Verlinde formula,
Proceedings of the Hirzebruch 65 Conference on Algebraic Geometry, Israel
Math. Conf. Proc. 9 (1996), 75–96.
[3] K. Behrend, Gromov-Witten invariants in algebraic geometry, Invent.
Math. 127 (1997), 601–617.
[4] K. Behrend and B. Fantechi, The intrinsic normal cone, Invent. Math. 128
(1997), 45–88.
[5] J. Bryan and T. Graber, The crepant resolution conjecture, In: Algebraic
geometry–Seattle 2005, Part 1, 23–42, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 80, Amer.
Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2009.
[6] J. Bryan and R. Pandharipande, The local Gromov-Witten theory of curves,
J. Amer. Math. Soc. 21 (2008), 101–136.
[7] H.-L. Chang, J. Li, and W.-P. Li, Witten's top Chern class via cosection
localization, Invent. Math. 200 (2015), 1015–1063.
[8] A. Chiodo, The Witten top Chern class via K-theory, J. Algebraic Geom.
15 (2006), 681–707.
[9] D. Cox and S. Katz, Mirror symmetry and algebraic geometry, Amer. Math.
Soc., Providence, RI, 1999.
[10] P. Deligne and D. Mumford, The irreducibility of the space of curves of
given genus, Pub. IHES 36 (1969), 75–109.
[11] C. Faber, A. Marian, and R. Pandharipande, Verlinde flatness and relations
in H ∗(Mg), https://people.math.ethz.ch/rahul/vertaut.pdf.
[12] N. Fakhruddin, Chern classes of conformal blocks, In: Compact moduli
spaces and vector bundles, Contemp. Math. 564, 145–176, Amer. Math.
Soc., Providence, RI, 2012.
[13] H. Fan, T. Jarvis, and Y. Ruan, The Witten equation, mirror symmetry
and quantum singularity theory, Ann. of Math. 178 (2013), 1–106.
[14] G. Farkas and R. Pandharipande, The moduli space of twisted canonical
divisors, J. Institute Math. Jussieu (to appear), arXiv:1508.07940.
[15] W. Fulton and R. Pandharipande, Notes on stable maps and quantum co-
homology, In: Algebraic geometry–Santa Cruz 1995, Part 2, Proc. Sympos.
Pure Math. 62, 45–96, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1997.
28
[16] A. Givental, Gromov-Witten invariants and quantization of quadratic
Hamiltonians, Mosc. Math. J. 1 (2001), 551–568.
[17] A. Givental, Semisimple Frobenius structures at higher genus, Internat.
Math. Res. Notices (2001), 1265–1286.
[18] T. Graber and R. Pandharipande, Localization of virtual classes, Invent.
Math. 135 (1999), 487–518.
[19] E.-N. Ionel and T. Parker, The Gopakumar-Vafa formula for symplectic
manifolds, Ann. of Math. (to appear).
[20] F. Janda, S. Guo, and Y. Ruan, A mirror theorem for genus two Gromov-
Witten invariants of quintic threefolds, arXiv:1709.07392.
[21] M. Kontsevich and Yu. Manin, Gromov-Witten classes, quantum cohomol-
ogy, and enumerative geometry, Comm. Math. Phys. 164 (1994), 525–562.
[22] Y.-P. Lee and R. Pandharipande, Frobenius manifolds, Gromov–Witten
theory, and Virasoro constraints,
https://people.math.ethz.ch/rahul/Part1.ps.
[23] H. Lho and R. Pandharipande, Stable quotients and the holomorphic
anomaly equation, arXiv:1702.06096.
[24] A. Marian, D. Oprea, R. Pandharipande, A. Pixton, and D. Zvonkine, The
Chern character of the Verlinde bundle over M g,n, J. Reine Angew. Math.
732 (2017), 147–163.
[25] D. Maulik, N. Nekrasov, A. Okounkov, and R. Pandharipande Gromov-
Witten theory and Donaldson-Thomas theory I, Compos. Math. 142 (2006),
1263–1285.
[26] T. Mochizuki, The virtual class of the moduli stack of stable r-spin curves,
Comm. Math. Phys. 264 (2006), 1–40.
[27] D. Mumford, Towards an enumerative geometry of the moduli space of
curves, in Arithmetic and Geometry (M. Artin and J. Tate, eds.), Part II,
Birkhauser, 1983, 271–328.
[28] H. Nakajima, Lectures on Hilbert schemes of points on surfaces, University
Lecture Series 18, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999.
[29] A. Okounkov and R. Pandharipande, Quantum cohomology of the Hilbert
scheme of points in the plane, Invent. Math. 179 (2010), 523–557.
[30] A. Okounkov and R. Pandharipande, The quantum differential equation of
the Hilbert scheme of points in the plane, Transform. Groups 15 (2010),
965–982.
29
[31] R. Pandharipande, A calculus for the moduli space of curves, Proceedings
of Algebraic geometry – Salt Lake City 2015, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math.
(to appear).
[32] R. Pandharipande, A. Pixton, and D. Zvonkine, Relations on M g,n via
3-spin structures, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 28 (2015), 279–309.
[33] R. Pandharipande, A. Pixton, and D. Zvonkine, Tautological relations via
r-spin structures, arXiv:1603.05151.
[34] R. Pandharipande and H.-H. Tseng, Higher genus Gromov-Witten theory
of the Hilbert scheme of points of the plane and CohFTs associated to local
curves, arXiv:1707.01406.
[35] A. Polishchuk, Witten's top Chern class on the moduli space of higher
spin curves, in Frobenius manifolds, 253–264, Aspects Math. E36, Vieweg,
Wiesbaden, 2004.
[36] A. Polishchuk and A. Vaintrob, Algebraic construction of Witten's top
Chern class, Advances in algebraic geometry motivated by physics (Lowell,
MA, 2000), 229–249, Contemp. Math. 276, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence,
RI, 2001.
[37] S. Shadrin, BCOV theory via Givental group action on cohomological fields
theories, Mosc. Math. J. 9 (2009), 411–429.
[38] C. Teleman, The structure of 2D semi-simple field theories, Invent. Math.
188 (2012), 525–588.
[39] M. Thaddeus, Stable pairs, linear systems and the Verlinde formula, Invent.
Math. 117 (1994), 317–353.
[40] Y. Tsuchimoto, On the coordinate-free description of the conformal blocks,
J . Math. Kyoto Univ. 33 (1993), 29–49.
[41] A. Tsuchiya, K. Ueno and Y. Yamada, Conformal field theory on univer-
sal family of stable curves with gauge symmetries, Integrable systems in
quantum field theory and statistical mechanics, Adv. Stud. Pure Math.
19, 459–566, Academic Press: Boston, MA, 1989.
[42] E. Witten, Algebraic geometry associated with matrix models of two-
dimensional gravity in Topological methods in modern mathematics (Stony
Brook, NY, 1991), 235–269, Publish or Perish, Houston, TX, 1993.
Departement Mathematik
ETH Zurich
[email protected]
30
|
1207.4047 | 7 | 1207 | 2013-12-22T13:20:56 | Detecting Symmetries of Rational Plane and Space Curves | [
"math.AG",
"cs.SC"
] | This paper addresses the problem of determining the symmetries of a plane or space curve defined by a rational parametrization. We provide effective methods to compute the involution and rotation symmetries for the planar case. As for space curves, our method finds the involutions in all cases, and all the rotation symmetries in the particular case of Pythagorean-hodograph curves. Our algorithms solve these problems without converting to implicit form. Instead, we make use of a relationship between two proper parametrizations of the same curve, which leads to algorithms that involve only univariate polynomials. These algorithms have been implemented and tested in the Sage system. | math.AG | math |
Detecting Symmetries
of Rational Plane and Space Curves
Juan Gerardo Alc´azara,1, Carlos Hermosoa, Georg Muntinghb,2
aDepartamento de F´ısica y Matem´aticas, Universidad de Alcal´a, E-28871 Madrid, Spain
bSINTEF ICT, PO Box 124 Blindern, 0314 Oslo, Norge, and
Department of Mathematics, University of Oslo, PO Box 1053, Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norge
Abstract
This paper addresses the problem of determining the symmetries of a plane or
space curve defined by a rational parametrization. We provide effective meth-
ods to compute the involution and rotation symmetries for the planar case.
As for space curves, our method finds the involutions in all cases, and all the
rotation symmetries in the particular case of Pythagorean-hodograph curves.
Our algorithms solve these problems without converting to implicit form. In-
stead, we make use of a relationship between two proper parametrizations of the
same curve, which leads to algorithms that involve only univariate polynomials.
These algorithms have been implemented and tested in the Sage system.
1. Introduction
The problem of detecting the symmetries of a curve has been studied extensively,
mainly because of its applications in Pattern Recognition, Computer Graphics
and Computer Vision.
In Pattern Recognition, a common problem is how to choose, from a database
of curves, the one which best suits a given object, represented by means of an
equation [14, 18, 30, 35, 36, 38]. Before a comparison can be carried out, one
must bring the shape that needs to be identified into a canonical position. Thus
it becomes necessary to compute the symmetries of the studied curve. In this
context, the computation of symmetries has been addressed using splines [14],
by means of differential invariants [7, 9, 40], using a complex representation of
the implicit equation of the curve [16, 17, 35], and using moments [14, 32, 33, 39].
In Computer Graphics, the detection of symmetries and similarities is im-
portant, both in the 2D and the 3D case, to gain understanding when analyzing
Email addresses: [email protected] (Juan Gerardo Alc´azar),
[email protected] (Carlos Hermoso), [email protected] (Georg Muntingh)
1Supported by the Spanish "Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion" under the Project
MTM2011-25816-C02-01. Member of the Research Group asynacs (Ref. ccee2011/r34)
2Partially supported by the Giner de los R´ıos grant from the Universidad de Alcal´a.
1
pictures, and also in order to perform tasks like compression, shape editing or
shape completion. Many techniques involve statistical methods and, in particu-
lar, clustering; see for example the papers [5, 6, 24, 25], where the technique of
transformation voting is used. Other techniques are robust auto-alignment [31],
spherical harmonic analysis [23], primitive fitting [28], and spectral analysis [21],
to quote a few.
In Computer Vision, symmetry is important for object detection and recogni-
tion. In this context, an analysis has been carried out using the Extended Gauss
Image [34] and using feature points [22]. In addition, there are algorithms for
computing the symmetries of 2D and 3D discrete objects [4, 8, 15, 19] and for
boundary-representation models [19, 20, 37].
In the case of discrete objects (polygons, polyhedra), the symmetries can be
determined exactly [4, 8, 15, 19]. This can be generalized to the case of more
complicated shapes whose geometry is described by a discrete object, as done in
[8], where an efficient algorithm is provided. Examples of this situation appear
with B´ezier curves and tensor product surfaces, where the shape follows from
the geometry of the control points. However, in almost all of the other above
references, the goal is to find approximate symmetries of the shape. This is
perfectly adequate in many applications, because the input is often a 'fuzzy'
shape, with missing or occluded parts in some cases. In fact, even if the input
is exact, it is often an approximate, simplified model of a real object. Here we
shall consider a different perspective. We assume that our input is exact, and
we want to deterministically detect the existence and nature of its symmetries,
without converting to implicit form. More precisely, our input will be either a
plane or a space curve C defined by means of a rational parametrization with
integer coefficients. Our goal is to (1) determine whether C has any symmetries,
and (2) determine all symmetries in the affirmative case.
Notice that since we are dealing with a global object, i.e., the whole curve
C, we do not have a control polygon from which the geometry of the curve, and
in particular its symmetries, can be derived. This could be the case if we were
addressing a piece of C, at least when C admits a polynomial parametrization.
In that situation, C could be brought into B´ezier form, and then an algorithm
like [8] could be applied.
In fact, in that case the algorithm of [8] would be
computationally more effective than ours, since essentially the analysis follows
from a discrete object. However, this idea is no longer applicable when the
whole curve is considered.
Additionally, an analysis of approximate symmetries of rational curves could
be attempted by sampling points on the curve, and then applying algorithms
like [8, 19, 20]. In that case, the question is how to choose suitable zones for
sampling, which amounts to collecting some information on the shape of the
curve [1]. A natural strategy is to look for notable points on the curve, like
singularities, inflection points or vertices: Since any symmetry maps notable
points of a certain nature to the same kind of points or leaves them invariant,
one might sample around these points. One thus obtains clusters of points that
must be compared. There would be various possibilities for comparing these
clusters, depending on the kind of symmetry one is looking for, all which should
2
be explored. Still, this approach only leads to an approximate estimate on the
existence of symmetries, which is a different problem than the one considered
in this paper.
Up to our knowledge, the deterministic problem for whole curves has only
been solved in the case of implicit plane curves [16, 17] and in the case of
polynomially parametrized plane curves [3]. The case of space curves seems
absent from the literature. In [16, 17], the authors provide an elegant method to
detect rotation symmetry of an implicitly defined algebraic curve, and efficiently
find the exact rotation angle and rotation center. The method uses a complex
representation F (z, ¯z) = 0 of the curve. Some cases not treated in [16] are
completed in [17], where similar ideas are applied to detect mirror symmetry.
In contrast, our method applies directly to the parametrization, which is the
most common representation in CAGD, avoiding the conversion into implicit
form. The approach in [3] is similar to ours, although it should be noted that
restricting to polynomial parametrizations yields an advantage for solving the
problem fast and efficiently.
The main ingredient in our method is the underlying relation between two
parametrizations of a curve that are proper, i.e., injective except perhaps for
finitely many values of the parameter. Essentially, whenever a symmetry is
present, this symmetry induces an alternative parametrization of the curve.
Furthermore, if the starting parametrization is proper, this second parametriza-
tion is also proper. Since two proper parametrizations of a same curve are
related by means of a Mobius transformation [29], we can reduce the problem
to finding this transformation. Thus, involutions, i.e., symmetries with respect
to a point, line or plane, can be detected and determined for plane and space
curves. For rotations, we need one more ingredient: a formulation in terms of
complex numbers for plane curves, or the Pythagorean-hodograph assumption
for space curves.
In practice, our methods boil down to computing greatest
common divisors and finding real roots of univariate polynomials, which are
tasks that can be performed efficiently.
2. Symmetries of plane and space curves
Throughout the paper we shall consider a rational curve C ⊂ Rn, where n = 2
or n = 3, neither a line nor a circle, defined by means of a proper rational
parametrization
x(t) =(cid:0)x1(t), x2(t), . . . , xn(t)(cid:1),
x : R (cid:57)(cid:57)(cid:75) C ⊂ Rn,
where
(1)
xi(t) =
pi(t)
qi(t)
,
pi, qi ∈ R[t],
gcd(pi, qi) = 1,
i = 1, . . . , n.
Here "gcd" refers to the greatest common divisor. Since C is rational, it is ir-
reducible. One can check whether a parametrization of a plane curve is proper,
3
and every rational plane curve can be properly reparametrized without extend-
ing the ground field. See [29] for a thorough study on properness and a proof
of these claims, and see [2, §3.1] for similar results for rational space curves.
We recall some facts from Euclidean geometry [10]. An isometry of Rn is a
map f : Rn −→ Rn preserving Euclidean distances. Any isometry f of Rn is
linear affine, taking the form
x ∈ Rn,
f (x) = Qx + b,
(2)
with b ∈ Rn and Q ∈ Rn×n an orthogonal matrix. In particular det(Q) = ±1.
The isometries of the plane and space form a group under composition that is
generated by reflections, i.e., symmetries with respect to a hyperplane, or mirror
symmetries. An isometry is called direct when it preserves the orientation, and
opposite when it does not. In the former case det(Q) = 1, while in the latter
case det(Q) = −1. The identity map idRn of Rn is called the trivial symmetry.
An isometry f (x) = Qx + b of Rn is called an involution if f ◦ f = idRn , in
which case Q2 = I is the identity matrix and b ∈ ker(Q + I).
The nontrivial isometries of the Euclidean plane are classified into reflec-
tions, rotations, translations, and glide reflections. The special case of central
symmetries is of particular interest and corresponds to a rotation by an angle π.
Central and mirror symmetries are involutions.
The classification of the nontrivial isometries of Euclidean space again in-
cludes reflections (in a plane), rotations (about an axis), and translations, and
these combine in commutative pairs to form twists, glide reflections, and rota-
tory reflections. Composing three reflections in mutually perpendicular planes
through a point P , yields a central inversion with center P , i.e., a symmetry
with respect to the point P . The special case of rotation by an angle π is
again of special interest, and it is called an axial symmetry. Central inversions,
reflections, and axial symmetries are involutions.
By B´ezout's theorem, an algebraic curve other than a line cannot be invari-
ant under a translation or glide reflection, and a space curve can, in addition,
not be invariant under a twist. We shall refer to the remaining isometries as
symmetries, and we shall say that a plane or space curve C is symmetric, if
it is invariant under a nontrivial symmetry. Any algebraic curve in the plane,
neither a line nor a circle, has finitely many symmetries [17, §5]. We need the
following lemma to show the same result for nondegenerate space curves, i.e.,
space curves not contained in a plane.
Lemma 1. Let C ⊂ R3 be a nondegenerate irreducible space curve, invariant
under a rotation with axis L and angle θ. Then θ = 2π/k, with k ≤ deg(C) an
integer.
Proof. For any plane Π normal to L, a rotation about L induces a rotation of
the same angle on Π around the point P := L ∩ Π. But then θ = 2π/k, with
k an integer that is at most the number of points in the intersection C ∩ Π;
however, this is at most deg(C) by definition of the degree of a nondegenerate
irreducible curve.
4
Lemma 2. Let C ⊂ R3 be an irreducible space curve, invariant under two
rotations f1, f2 with axes L1,L2. Then L1,L2 cannot be parallel.
Proof. Suppose that L1,L2 are parallel. Let Π be a plane normal to L1,L2
that intersects C in at least one point. The set C ∩ Π is invariant under both
rotations. But if a set of planar points exhibits rotation symmetry, then the
rotation center must be the barycenter of the points, implying that L1 = L2.
Proposition 3. Let C ⊂ R3 be a space curve different from a line or a circle.
Then C is invariant under at most:
(i) one central inversion;
(ii) finitely many rotation symmetries, whose axes are all concurrent;
(iii) finitely many mirror symmetries, whose planes share a point.
Proof. This result is known to hold when C is degenerate [17], so assume that
C is nondegenerate.
(i): If C is invariant under two central inversions with symmetry centers P1
and P2, then it is invariant under their composition, which is a translation by
2(cid:107)P1 − P2(cid:107) along the direction P1P2 [10, §7.3]. Since C is not a line, it cannot
be invariant under a nontrivial translation, implying that P1 = P2.
(ii): The composition of two rotations with axes L1,L2 is: (a) when the axes
are parallel, a rotation with axis parallel to L1,L2; (b) when the axes intersect,
a rotation with axis passing through L1 ∩ L2; (c) when the axes are skew, a
twist. We can discard the cases (a) (by Lemma 2) and (c).
In the remaining case (b), if C is invariant under three rotations with axes
intersecting pairwise in three distinct points forming a plane Π, then the com-
position of any two rotations with axes L1,L2 yields a rotation with axis L
intersecting Π transversally in a point away from the third axis L3. But then
the axes L and L3 are skew, which is case (c) and cannot happen.
Finally, suppose we have an infinite number of rotation axes {Li} meeting
in a point P . The set of lines through P forms a real projective plane P2(R),
which is compact. The points {Pi} ⊂ P2(R) corresponding to the axes {Li} will
therefore have a point of accumulation P. Any neighbourhood of P will contain
an infinite number of points in {Pi}, corresponding to an infinite number of axes
in {Li}. These axes meet in infinitely many distinct angles. The composition of
two rotations with concurrent axes is another rotation, about an axis perpen-
dicular to the concurrent rotation axes. If the rotations have rotation angles
α, β and their axes meet with an angle Φ, then the composition is a rotation by
an angle γ, where [13]
· cos(Φ).
(cid:16) γ
(cid:17)
2
cos
= cos
(cid:17) · cos
(cid:16) α
2
(cid:18) β
(cid:19)
2
(cid:17) · sin
(cid:16) α
2
(cid:18) β
(cid:19)
2
− sin
Since there are finitely many α, β by Lemma 1 but infinitely many angles Φ,
we get infinitely many angles γ as well, therefore contradicting Lemma 1. We
5
conclude that C has at most finitely many rotation symmetries, whose axes are
concurrent.
(iii): The composition of two mirror symmetries with planes Π1, Π2 is: (a) if
the planes are parallel, a translation; (b) if the planes intersect, a rotation about
Π1 ∩ Π2 making twice the angle as between Π1, Π2. Case (a) can be discarded,
so all mirror symmetries of C have intersecting planes, and the statement follows
in the case that C has at most two mirror symmetries.
Suppose C has at least three mirror symmetries f1, f2, f3 with corresponding
planes Π1, Π2, Π3. If these three planes intersect in a point at infinity, then any
two pairs, say (Π1, Π2) and (Π1, Π3), intersect in parallel lines L := Π1∩ Π2 and
L(cid:48) := Π1 ∩ Π3 in the finite plane, which cannot happen by Lemma 2. It follows
that the three planes intersect in a point P := Π1 ∩ Π2 ∩ Π3 in the finite plane.
Suppose there is a fourth mirror symmetry f4 with plane Π4 not containing
P . Then Π4 intersects Π3 in a certain line L(cid:48)(cid:48). If L(cid:48)(cid:48) does not pass through P ,
then C has rotation symmetries about the two skew axes L and L(cid:48)(cid:48). But then
C would be invariant under their composition, which is a twist, and this cannot
happen. So Π4 also contains P and (iii) holds.
Corollary 4. The number of symmetries of a plane or space curve, other than
a line or a circle, is finite.
The following theorem forms the foundation of our method. We need the
definition of a Mobius transformation (on the affine real line), which is a rational
function
ϕ : R (cid:57)(cid:57)(cid:75) R,
ϕ(t) =
at + b
ct + d
,
∆ := ad − bc (cid:54)= 0.
(3)
In particular the identity map is a Mobius transformation, which we refer to as
the trivial transformation.
Theorem 5. The curve C in (1) is invariant under a nontrivial symmetry f of
the form (2) if and only if there exists a nontrivial Mobius transformation ϕ,
with real coefficients a, b, c, d, such that
f(cid:0)x(t)(cid:1) = x(cid:0)ϕ(t)(cid:1).
(4)
Moreover, for any f there is a unique Mobius transformation ϕ satisfying (4).
"=⇒": Let x(t) := f(cid:0)x(t)(cid:1). Since x is proper, x−1 is defined for all but
Proof. If there are two Mobius transformations ϕ1, ϕ2 satisfying (4), then x(ϕ1) =
x(ϕ2). Since x is proper, it follows that ϕ1 = ϕ2. For the first claim:
finitely many values, and x−1 ◦ x is a birational map ϕ := x−1 ◦ x from the
real line to itself. Any such map lifts to a birational automorphism of the
complex projective line P(C), which are known to be Mobius transformations
[29]. It follows that ϕ takes the form (3) and is nontrivial because f is nontrivial.
Moreover, since ϕ maps the real line to itself, we can assume that the coefficients
of ϕ(t) are real.
6
"⇐=": If f(cid:0)x(t)(cid:1) = x(cid:0)ϕ(t)(cid:1) for some nontrivial isometry f and nontrivial
Mobius transformation ϕ, we observe that x(t) := f(cid:0)x(t)(cid:1) is an alternative
parametrization of C, and therefore that C is invariant under f .
Equation (4) relates the symmetries of C to Mobius transformations in the
parameter domain. We obtain the following lemma.
Lemma 6. Suppose an isometry f and Mobius transformation ϕ are related by
(4). For any integer k, the composition f k = idRn if and only if ϕk = idR.
Proof. Because x is proper, its inverse x−1 exists as a rational map, and ϕ =
x−1 ◦ f ◦ x. The result follows from ϕk = (x−1 ◦ f ◦ x)k = x−1 ◦ f k ◦ x.
At this point one could in principle find the symmetries of C by determining
f and ϕ satisfying the equation (4). However, the resulting polynomial system
would involve too many variables in the coefficients of ϕ and f to be solved
efficiently. In the following section we propose an efficient method to determine
the symmetries of C.
3. Determining symmetries of plane and space curves
To consider plane and space curves in one go, we embed R2 into R3 as the
plane of points with zero third component. The mappings on R2 are lifted to
mappings of R3 leaving the third component invariant.
For technical reasons, we assume that x(0) is well defined, and that x(cid:48)(0), x(cid:48)(cid:48)(0)
are also well defined, nonzero, and not parallel. Notice that this amounts to re-
quiring that the curvature
κ(t) :=
(cid:107)x(cid:48)(t) × x(cid:48)(cid:48)(t)(cid:107)
(cid:107)x(cid:48)(t)(cid:107)3
is well defined and nonzero at t = 0. Since this is the case for almost all
parameters t, this condition holds after applying an appropriate, even random,
linear affine change of the parameter t.
Assume that the plane or space curve C in (1) is invariant under a nontrivial
symmetry f (x) = Qx + b. By Theorem 5, there is a Mobius transformation ϕ
satisfying (4). Our strategy will be to first, in Sections 3.1 -- 3.5, express all
unknown parameters in Q, b, and ϕ as rational functions of a single parameter
b of ϕ. Substituting these rational functions into (4) and clearing denominators,
one obtains three polynomials in t, whose coefficients are polynomials in b.
For (4) to hold identically for all t, each of these polynomial coefficients must
be zero, which happens if and only if their greatest common divisor vanishes.
Removing from this polynomial all factors for which the Mobius transformation
or symmetry is not defined or not invertible, one obtains a polynomial P (b) in
which every real root corresponds to a symmetry.
Let f be a plane rotation or an involution in R2 or R3. Alternatively, let f be
any isometry and C be a Pythagorean-Hodograph curve. We can now formulate
the main theorem of the paper, which will be proved case-by-case in Sections
3.1 -- 3.5.
7
Theorem 7. The curve C has a nontrivial symmetry f if and only if P (b) has
a real root b at which the parameters of Q, b, and ϕ are well defined.
Each real root of P (b) determines a Mobius transformation, which corre-
sponds uniquely to a symmetry of C by Theorem 5. By Corollary 4, C has at
most finitely many symmetries, implying that P (b) cannot be identically zero.
Finally, observe that one can directly find the symmetry type and its ele-
ments by analyzing the set of fixed points of the symmetry f (x) = Q(b)x+b(b).
In particular, rank(cid:0)Q(b)− I(cid:1) is 1 for a symmetry with respect to a plane; 2 for a
symmetry with respect to a line; 3 for a rotation symmetry or central inversion.
3.1. The case d = 0
If d = 0, equation (4) becomes
Qx(t) + b = x(cid:0)ϕ(t)(cid:1) = x(cid:0)a/t + b(cid:1),
where a := b/c and b := a/c. Applying the change of variables t −→ 1/t and
writing x(t) := x(1/t), we obtain
Qx(t) + b = x(cid:0)at + b(cid:1).
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
Without loss of generality, we assume that x(t) is well defined at t = 0 and that
x(cid:48)(0), x(cid:48)(cid:48)(0) are well defined, nonzero, and not parallel. Evaluating (5) at t = 0
yields
Qx(0) + b = x(b),
while differentiating once and twice and evaluating at t = 0 yields
Qx(cid:48)(0) = x(cid:48)(b) · a,
Qx(cid:48)(cid:48)(0) = x(cid:48)(cid:48)(b) · a2.
Taking inner products and using that Q is orthogonal, we get
a2 =
(cid:107)x(cid:48)(0)(cid:107)2
(cid:107)x(cid:48)(b)(cid:107)2
,
a3 =
(cid:104)x(cid:48)(0), x(cid:48)(cid:48)(0)(cid:105)
(cid:104)x(cid:48)(b), x(cid:48)(cid:48)(b)(cid:105) ,
from which we can write a as a rational function of b,
a =
(cid:107)x(cid:48)(b)(cid:107)2
(cid:107)x(cid:48)(0)(cid:107)2 · (cid:104)x(cid:48)(0), x(cid:48)(cid:48)(0)(cid:105)
(cid:104)x(cid:48)(b), x(cid:48)(cid:48)(b)(cid:105) .
A straightforward, but lengthy, calculation yields
(M a) × (M b) = det(M )M−T (a × b)
(10)
for any invertible matrix M ∈ R3×3 and vectors a, b ∈ R3. Taking the cross
product in (7) and using that Q is orthogonal, one obtains
Q(cid:0)x(cid:48)(0) × x(cid:48)(cid:48)(0)(cid:1) = det(Q)(cid:0)x(cid:48)(b) × x(cid:48)(cid:48)(b)(cid:1) · a3.
(11)
8
We analyze separately the cases n = 2 and n = 3. For n = 2, (7) implies
that multiplying Q by the matrix A := [x(cid:48)(0), x(cid:48)(cid:48)(0)] gives the matrix B :=
[x(cid:48)(b)a, x(cid:48)(cid:48)(b)a2] so that Q = BA−1. For n = 3, multiplying Q by the matrix
A := [x(cid:48)(0), x(cid:48)(cid:48)(0), x(cid:48)(0) × x(cid:48)(cid:48)(0)] gives the matrix
B :=(cid:2)x(cid:48)(b)a, x(cid:48)(cid:48)(b)a2, det(Q)(cid:0)x(cid:48)(b) × x(cid:48)(cid:48)(b)(cid:1) · a3(cid:3)
and Q = BA−1. One sets det(Q) = 1 to find the direct transformations and
det(Q) = −1 to find the opposite transformations. Substituting a = a(b), one
expresses Q as a matrix-valued rational function of b. Finally from (6) one
expresses b as a vector-valued rational function of b.
3.2. The case d (cid:54)= 0
If d (cid:54)= 0, we may and will assume d = 1 after scaling the coefficients of ϕ if
necessary. Differentiating (4) twice, we get
(cid:19)
Qx(cid:48)(t) = x(cid:48)(cid:0)ϕ(t)(cid:1) · ϕ(cid:48)(t) = x(cid:48)(cid:18) at + b
+ x(cid:48)(cid:0)ϕ(t)(cid:1)ϕ(cid:48)(cid:48)(t)
Qx(cid:48)(cid:48)(t) = x(cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:0)ϕ(t)(cid:1)(cid:0)ϕ(cid:48)(t)(cid:1)2
(cid:19) ∆2
(ct + d)4 − 2x(cid:48)(cid:18) at + b
= x(cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:18) at + b
ct + d
ct + d
ct + d
(cid:19)
∆
(ct + d)2 ,
c∆
(ct + d)3 .
Evaluating (12) and (13) at t = 0 yields
Qx(cid:48)(0) = x(cid:48)(b)∆,
Qx(cid:48)(cid:48)(0) = x(cid:48)(cid:48)(b)∆2 − 2x(cid:48)(b)c∆.
From (14), and using that Q is orthogonal, we can express
∆2 =
(cid:107)x(cid:48)(0)(cid:107)2
(cid:107)x(cid:48)(b)(cid:107)2
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
solely in terms of b. Taking the cross product of (14), (15) and using again (10)
and that Q is orthogonal, one obtains
Q(cid:0)x(cid:48)(0) × x(cid:48)(cid:48)(0)(cid:1) = det(Q) · ∆3(cid:0)x(cid:48)(b) × x(cid:48)(cid:48)(b)(cid:1).
Using (16) and taking norms, one reaches
(cid:107)x(cid:48)(0) × x(cid:48)(cid:48)(0)(cid:107)2(cid:107)x(cid:48)(b)(cid:107)6 − (cid:107)x(cid:48)(0)(cid:107)6(cid:107)x(cid:48)(b) × x(cid:48)(cid:48)(b)(cid:107)2 = 0,
which amounts to κ2(b) = κ2(0). If this equation does not have a real root, then
we know that C does not have any symmetry of any type. If it does, then we
proceed to write Q in terms of b. By computing the dot product of (14), (15)
and using that Q is orthogonal, we get
c = −(cid:104)x(cid:48)(cid:48)(0), x(cid:48)(0)(cid:105)
2(cid:107)x(cid:48)(0)(cid:107)2 + ∆
(cid:104)x(cid:48)(cid:48)(b), x(cid:48)(b)(cid:105)
2(cid:107)x(cid:48)(b)(cid:107)2
.
(19)
Next we consider separately involutions and plane rotations for which the
corresponding Mobius transformation has parameter d = 1.
9
3.3. Involutions
Assume that f (x) = Qx + b is a nontrivial involution. Then
x = f 2(x) = Q(Qx + b) + b = Q2x + (Q + I)b,
x ∈ Rn,
implying that Q2 = I. By Lemma 6, ϕ2 = idR, implying that (a + d)b = 0,
If a + d (cid:54)= 0, then b = c = 0 and a = d, and
(a + d)c = 0, and a2 = d2.
therefore ϕ = idR, which contradicts that f (x) is nontrivial. Therefore a = −d.
So, ∆ = −1 − bc, and from (19) we can write
(cid:17)
c = c(b) = −(cid:104)x(cid:48)(b), x(cid:48)(cid:48)(b)(cid:105)(cid:107)x(cid:48)(0)(cid:107)2 + (cid:104)x(cid:48)(0), x(cid:48)(cid:48)(0)(cid:105)(cid:107)x(cid:48)(b)(cid:107)2
(cid:16)
b(cid:104)x(cid:48)(b), x(cid:48)(cid:48)(b)(cid:105) + 2(cid:107)x(cid:48)(b)(cid:107)2
(cid:107)x(cid:48)(0)(cid:107)2
.
(20)
as a rational function of b.
By changing the parametrization if necessary, we can determine c(b) by
assuming that the numerator and denominator of the above fraction have no
real root in common. Alternatively, we can take the gcd of the numerator and
denominator and find the common real roots b, determine the corresponding
∆(b) from (16) by considering both signs separately, and c(b) from ∆(b) =
−1 − b · c(b). Moreover, the denominator of this expression vanishes iff
0 = b(cid:104)x(cid:48)(b), x(cid:48)(cid:48)(b)(cid:105) + 2(cid:107)x(cid:48)(b)(cid:107)2 =
(cid:107)x(cid:48)(b)(cid:107)2 + 2(cid:107)x(cid:48)(b)(cid:107)2,
b
2
d
db
which happens precisely when (cid:107)x(cid:48)(b)(cid:107)2 = M/b4, with M a nonzero constant.
However, in that case x(cid:48)(0) is not defined, which contradicts one of our initial
assumptions. Hence, the above expression for c(b) is well defined.
Once the rational functions ∆ = ∆(b) and c = c(b) are obtained, the matrix
Q = Q(b) can again be determined from its action on x(cid:48)(0), x(cid:48)(cid:48)(0), and x(cid:48)(0) ×
x(cid:48)(cid:48)(0), which is given by equations (14), (15), and (17). One finds b(b) from
evaluating (4) at t = 0.
3.4. Plane rotations
In order to detect rotation symmetries in the plane, we identify the Euclidean
plane with the complex plane as (x1, x2) (cid:39) x1 + x2i. Thus the parametrization
x = (x1, x2) in (1) yields a parametrization
z : R (cid:57)(cid:57)(cid:75) C ⊂ C,
z(t) = x1(t) + x2(t)i,
where we denoted the curve by the same symbol C. Writing z0 for the rotation
center and θ for the rotation angle, equation (4) takes the form
(21)
(22)
Differentiating this expression we obtain
(cid:1).
z(cid:0)ϕ(t)(cid:1) = z0 + eiθ ·(cid:0)z(t) − z0
z(cid:48)(cid:0)ϕ(t)(cid:1) ·
(ct + d)2 = eiθ · z(cid:48)(t).
∆
10
Without loss of generality, we assume that z(t) is well defined at t = 0 and
z(cid:48)(0) (cid:54)= 0, so that evaluating (21) and (22) at t = 0 gives
z(b) − eθiz(0)
eiθ = ∆
z(cid:48)(b)
z(cid:48)(0)
,
z0 =
1 − eθi
,
(23)
expressing the symmetry in terms of the Mobius transformation. Differentiating
(22), evaluating at t = 0, and solving for c, we deduce
(cid:20) z(cid:48)(cid:48)(b)
z(cid:48)(b)
c =
1
2
∆ − z(cid:48)(cid:48)(0)
z(cid:48)(0)
(cid:21)
.
(24)
Since all coefficients of ϕ are real, the imaginary part of the above expression
for c must be zero, which yields rational expressions ∆ = ∆(b), c = c(b), and
therefore also a = a(b) = ∆(b) + b· c(b). The symmetry itself is determined from
(23).
3.5. Space rotations and Pythagorean-Hodograph curves
Some rotation symmetries of space curves are found by the previous algorithms.
Since axial symmetries are involutions, these rotations will be found directly by
the method of Section 3.3. By the Cartan-Dieudonn´e Theorem, any rotation f
in R3 is the composition of three reflections f1, f2, f3. However, if our curve C
has a rotation symmetry f , then these reflections f1, f2, f3 need not be mirror
symmetries of our curve. Taking compositions of the reflections found in Section
3.3 will therefore only yield some of the rotations of C. In addition, the rotations
whose corresponding Mobius transformation have parameter d = 0 will be found
by the method of Section 3.1.
Unfortunately it seems that the approach of the previous section can not be
generalized to find all rotations of space curves. The complex numbers in the
plane can be replaced by quaternions [11, 12] in space, which provides a conve-
nient way to express rotations. For instance, one can give quaternion versions
of (12) and (13). The difficulty, however, comes from the fact that quaternions
are not commutative, which makes it hard to eliminate the parameters defining
the rotation in the resulting equations. Because of this, we have not been able
to prove a version of Theorem 7 for space rotations.
In fact, we are uncer-
tain whether it is possible in that case to write all parameters of the Mobius
transformation as rational functions of just one of them. While we might write
these parameters in terms of two of them, which would yield a bivariate polyno-
mial system, we feel that this solution is not satisfactory computationally. We
therefore pose the question here as a pending problem.
However, if the curve C from (1) is a Pythagorean-Hodograph curve, i.e., if
there exists a rational function σ(t) such that
(cid:107)x(cid:48)(t)(cid:107)2 = x(cid:48)2
1 (t) + x(cid:48)2
2 (t) + ··· + x(cid:48)2
n (t) = σ2(t),
then we do not run into the same obstacle. Such curves form an important topic
in Computer Aided Geometric Design, and they have been studied extensively
11
(a)
(b)
Figure 1: The deltoid from (25) (left) and the twisted cubic from (28) (right).
both from the point of view of theory and of applications [11].
In this case
we can determine all rotation symmetries, since (16) gives a rational function
∆(b) = ±(cid:107)x(cid:48)(0)(cid:107)/σ(b), from which we find a rational function c(b) by (19), and
finally a rational function a(b) = ∆(b) + b · c(b). After this we determine the
symmetry as before. The sign of ∆(b) is not easily determined in advance, so it
is necessary to carry out the algorithm for both cases.
4. Implementation and experimentation
For all but the simplest examples, the computations quickly become too large
to be carried out by hand, and a computer algebra system is needed. We have
therefore implemented and tested the algorithms in Sage [27]. The resulting
worksheet with implementations and examples can be downloaded from the
website of the third author [26].
4.1. An example: rotations of the deltoid
Let C be the deltoid from Figure 1a, defined parametrically as the image of the
map z : R −→ C,
z(t) =
−t4 + 4t3 − 12t2 + 16t − 4
t4 − 4t3 + 8t2 − 8t + 4
8t3 − 24t2 + 24t − 8
t4 − 4t3 + 8t2 − 8t + 4
i.
+
(25)
We follow the recipe from Section 3.4 to find its rotations. This parametrization
is well defined at t = 0 and satisfies z(cid:48)(0) (cid:54)= 0. Using that the imaginary part
of (24) is zero, we find ∆(b) = 1
2 b2 − b + 1,
c(b) =
b(2b3 − 3b2 − 18b + 22)
4(b2 − 2b − 2)(1 − b)
,
a(b) =
7b4 − 34b3 + 30b2 + 8b − 8
4(1 − b)(b2 − 2b − 2)
.
The symmetry is determined by (23), as
eθi(b) = − (b − 1)(b2 − 2b − 2)
(b2 − 2b + 2)2
(b − 2 + bi),
(26)
12
-3-2-1123-3-2-1123 z0(b) = −3
b2 − 6b + 6
(5b4 − 32b3 + 72b2 − 64b + 20)
(cid:0)b2 − 4b + 2 + 2(b − 2)(b − 1)i(cid:1). (27)
Substituting these expressions into (21) yields a rational function in t, whose
coefficients are polynomials in b. This rational function is identically zero if and
only if the gcd b(b−1)(b2−2b−2)(b2−6b+6) of the coefficients in the numerator
is zero. Removing all factors for which either the Mobius transformation or
b(b2 − 6b + 6). Substituting its three real zeros b = 0, 3 ± √
the symmetry is not defined or not invertible, we obtain a polynomial P (b) =
3 into (26), (27)
we find rotations about z0 = 0 with angles θ = 0, 2π/3, 4π/3. There are no
additional symmetries for the case d = 0.
(cid:18) 1
(cid:19)
4.2. An example: involutions of the twisted cubic
Let C be the twisted cubic, defined parametrically as the image of the map
x : R −→ C ⊂ R3,
t (cid:55)−→
t + 1
From (20) and using that ∆ = −1 − bc we find
,
1
(t + 1)2 ,
1
(t + 1)3
.
(28)
c(b) =
(b + 2)(25b4 + 89b3 + 228b2 + 262b + 350)
14(b4 + 2b3 + 6b2 + b + 14)
,
∆(b) = − (b + 1)(25b + 14)(b4 + 4b3 + 10b2 + 12b + 14)
14(b4 + 2b3 + 6b2 + b + 14)
.
One obtains Q(b) from (14), (15), and (17) and b(b) from evaluating (4) at
t = 0. Substituting Q(b), b(b), and c(b) into (4), one finds that the coefficients
of the powers of t in the numerator have gcd
(b + 2)(25b + 14)(b4 + 4b3 + 10b2 + 12b + 14)
for direct transformations and
(25b + 14)(b4 + 4b3 + 10b2 + 12b + 14)
for opposite transformations. Since the Mobius transformation is invertible,
∆(b) is nonzero and there is only one relevant factor P (b) = b + 2 for the direct
transformations. Substituting b = −2 into ∆(b), b(b), and c(b), one finds the
Mobius transformation ϕ(t) = −t − 2 with corresponding axial symmetry
f (x) = Qx + b,
Q =
b =
−1
0
0
,
0
0
1
0
0 −1
0
.
0
0
This symmetry is depicted in Figure 1b by connecting corresponding points by
lines. There are no additional symmetries for the case d = 0.
13
deg.
parametrization z
u(t) #rot #inv
trot
tinv
3u + u3i
t−1
t+1
1
1
0.09
0.09
3u+3u2i
u3+1
t + 1
0
1
0.23
0.29
1−7u4+18u2−(20u3−4u)i
(u2+1)2
t − 1
1−3u2
(u2+1)2 (u + i)
t − 1
− u4+u2−3−8u3i
(u2+1)2
(1−u2)(1+u2+2ui)
u4+6u2+1
(1−u2)3+8u3i
(1+u2)3
t + 1
t + 2
2t−1
t+2
0
2
2
1
3
0
1
0.12
0.14
3
0.53
0.82
3
3
5
0.17
0.47
0.15
0.25
0.75
1.65
1
0.30
0.37
curve
cubic
folium
epitrochoid
3-leaf rose
deltoid
lemniscate
astroid
3
3
4
4
4
4
6
cardioid offset
8
see worksheet [26]
Table 1: Average CPU times trot and tinv (seconds) for determining rotations
and involutions of classical plane curves.
14
curve
degree
parametrization x
u(t) #inv
tinv
twisted cubic
cusp
axial sym. 1
crunode
inversion 1
space rose
inversion 2
(cid:0)u, u2, u3(cid:1)
(cid:0)u2, u3, u4(cid:1)
(cid:16) u3+u
u4+1 , u3
u4+1 , u2
u4+1
(cid:16) u
1+u4 , u2
1+u4 , u3
1+u4
1
t+1
1
0.26
t−1
t+1
1
0.52
t + 1
1
2.22
t + 2
3
39.6
(cid:17)
(cid:17)
(cid:0)u7, u3 + u, u5 + u3(cid:1)
(cid:16) 1−3u2
(1+u2)2 , (1−3u2)u
(1+u2)2 , (1−3u2)u3
(1+u2)4
t−2
t+1
1
6.8
(cid:17)
t − 1
1
57.6
3
4
4
4
7
8
(cid:0)u11, u3 + u, u5 + u3(cid:1)
11
t−2
t+1
1
75.6
Table 2: Average CPU time tinv (seconds) for involutions of several space curves.
15
4.3. Performance
We test the performance of the algorithms in Section 3 for several classical
curves on a Dell XPS 15 laptop, with 2.4 GHz i5-2430M processor and 6 GB
RAM. Additional technical details are provided in the Sage worksheet [26].
For each curve, Tables 1 and 2 list the degree, a standard parametrization, a
reparametrization u(t) that brings this curve into general position, the number
#rot and #inv of (nontrivial) rotations and involutions found, and the aver-
age CPU times trot and tinv (seconds) of the computations. In each case the
algorithm for finding rotations performs better than the algorithm for finding
involutions. The curves "inversion 1" and "inversion 2" are constructed to have
precisely one central inversion.
Note that the algorithm for finding involutions of space curves performs
significantly worse for the crunode in Table 2 than for the other curves of degree
four. The reason seems to be that, besides the degree of a parametrization, the
sizes of the coefficients greatly influence the performance of the algorithms.
Even rational numbers with relatively small numerator and denominator get
blown up by simple arithmetic operations. This is a common problem when
computing in exact arithmetic.
Most of the computation time is spent by substituting the symmetry and
Mobius transformation in (4) and finding the polynomial conditions on the
parameter b.
5. Conclusion
We have provided effective methods for determining the involution symmetries
of a plane or space curve defined by a rational parametrization, and the rotation
symmetries of a rational plane or Pythagorean-hodograph space curve. Exam-
ples were given, and the algorithms have been implemented in Sage. Experi-
ments show that we can generally quickly compute the rotation and involution
symmetries of curves of relatively low degree. The current approach cannot
guarantee to find all the rotation symmetries of a space curve efficiently, ex-
cept in the case of Pythagorean-hodograph curves. For the general case, an
alternative strategy seems to be required.
References
[1] Alc´azar J.G., D´ıaz-Toca G.M. (2010), Topology of 2D and 3D rational
curves, Computer Aided Geometric Design vol. 27 (7), pp. 483 -- 502.
[2] Alc´azar J.G. (2012), Computing the shapes arising in a family of space
rational curves depending on one parameter, Computer Aided Geometric
Design vol. 29, pp. 315 -- 331.
[3] Alc´azar J.G. (2014), Efficient detection of symmetries of polynomially
parametrized curves, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
vol. 255, pp. 715 -- 724.
16
[4] Alt H., Mehlhorn K., Wagener H., Welzl E. Congruence, similarity and
symmetries of geometric objects. Discrete Computational Geometry vol. 3,
pp. 237 -- 256.
[5] Berner A., Bokeloh M., Wand M., Schilling A., Seidel H.P. (2008), A Graph-
Based Approach to Symmetry Detection. Symposium on Volume and Point-
Based Graphics (2008), pp. 1 -- 8.
[6] Bokeloh M., Berner A., Wand M., Seidel H.P., Schilling A. (2009), Sym-
metry Detection Using Line Features. Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 28,
No. 2. (2009), pp. 697 -- 706.
[7] Boutin M. (2000), Numerically Invariant Signature Curves, International
Journal of Computer Vision 40(3), pp. 235 -- 248.
[8] Brass P., Knauer C. (2004), Testing congruence and symmetry for general
3-dimensional objects. Computational Geometry vol. 27, pp. 3 -- 11.
[9] Calabi E., Olver P.J., Shakiban C., Tannenbaum A., Haker S. (1998), Dif-
ferential and Numerically Invariant Signature Curves Applied to Object
Recognition, International Journal of Computer Vision, 26(2), pp. 107 -- 135.
[10] Coxeter, H. S. M. (1969), Introduction to geometry, Second Edition, John
Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York-London-Sydney.
[11] Farouki R.T. (2008), Pythagorean-Hodograph Curves, Springer.
[12] Goldman R. (2010), Rethinking Quaternions: Theory and Computation,
Synthesis Lectures on Computer Graphics and Animation, Morgan and
Clayter Publishers.
[13] Heard W.B. (2006), Rigid Body Mechanics: Mathematics, Physics and Ap-
plications, Wiley-VCH Verlag.
[14] Huang Z., Cohen F.S. (1996), Affine-Invariant B-Spline Moments for Curve
Matching, IEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 5, No. 10, pp. 1473 --
1480.
[15] Jiang X., Yu K., Bunke H. (1996), Detection of rotational and involutional
symmetries and congruity of polyhedra. The Visual Computer vol. 12(4),
pp. 193 -- 201.
[16] Lebmeir P., Richter-Gebert J. (2008), Rotations, Translations and Symme-
try Detection for Complexified Curves, Computer Aided Geometric Design
25, pp. 707 -- 719.
[17] Lebmeir P. (2009), Feature Detection for Real Plane Algebraic Curves,
Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universitat Munchen.
17
[18] Lei Z., Tasdizen T., Cooper D.B. (1998), PIMs and Invariant Parts for
Shape Recognition, Proceedings Sixth International Conference on Com-
puter Vision, pp. 827 -- 832.
[19] Li M., Langbein F., Martin R. (2008), Detecting approximate symmetries
of discrete point subsets. Computer-Aided Design vol. 40(1), pp. 76 -- 93.
[20] Li M., Langbein F., Martin R. (2010), Detecting design intent in approxi-
mate CAD models using symmetry. Computer-Aided Design vol. 42(3), pp.
183 -- 201.
[21] Lipman Y., Cheng X., Daubechies I., Funkhouser T. (2010), Symmetry
factored embedding and distance, ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIG-
GRAPH 2010).
[22] Loy G., Eklundh J. (2006). Detecting symmetry and symmetric constella-
tions of features. Proceedings ECCV 2006, 9th European Conference on
Computer Vision, pp. 508 -- 521.
[23] Martinet A., Soler C., Holzschuch N., Sillion F. (2006) Accurate Detection
of Symmetries in 3D Shapes. ACM Trans. Graphics, 25 (2), pp. 439 -- 464.
[24] Mitra N.J., Guibas L.J., Pauly M. (2006), Partial and approximate sym-
metry detection for 3d geometry, ACM Transactions on Graph. 25 (3), pp.
560 -- 568.
[25] Podolak J., Shilane P., Golovinskiy A., Rusinkiewicz S., Funkhouser T.
(2006), A Planar-Reflective Symmetry Transform for 3D Shapes. Proceed-
ing SIGGRAPH 2006, pp. 549 -- 559.
[26] Muntingh G., personal website, software
https://sites.google.com/site/georgmuntingh/academics/software
[27] Stein, W. A. et al. (2013), Sage Mathematics Software (Version 5.9), The
Sage Development Team, http://www.sagemath.org.
[28] Schnabel R., Wessel R., Wahl R., Klein R. (2008), Shape Recognition in
3D-Point Clouds, The 16-th International Conference in Central Europe
on Computer Graphics, Visualization and Computer Vision '08.
[29] Sendra J.R., Winkler F., Perez-Diaz S. (2008), Rational Algebraic Curves,
Springer-Verlag.
[30] Sener S., Unel M. (2005), Affine invariant fitting of algebraic curves using
Fourier descriptors, Pattern Analysis and Applications Vol. 8, pp. 72 -- 83.
[31] Simari P., Kalogerakis E., Singh K. (2006), Folding meshes: hierarchical
mesh segmentation based on planar symmetry. Proc. Symp. Geometry Pro-
cessing, pp. 111 -- 119.
18
[32] Suk T., Flusser J. (1993), Pattern Recognition by Affine Moment Invari-
ants, Pattern Recognition, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 167 -- 174.
[33] Suk T., Flusser J. (2005), Affine Normalization of Symmetric Objects, in
Proceedings ACIVS 2005, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 100 -- 107.
[34] Sun C., Sherrah J. (1997), 3-D Symmetry Detection Using the Extended
Gaussian Image, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine In-
telligence, Vol. 19, pp. 164 -- 168.
[35] Tarel J.P., Cooper D.B. (2000), The Complex Representation of Algebraic
Curves and Its Simple Exploitation for Pose Estimation and Invariant
Recognition, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intel-
ligence, vol. 22, No. 7, pp. 663 -- 674.
[36] Tasdizen T., Tarel J.P., Cooper D.B. (2000), Improving the Stability of
Algebraic Curves for Applications, IEE Transactions on Image Processing,
Vol. 9, pp. 405 -- 416.
[37] Tate S., Jared G. Recognising symmetry in solid models. Computer-Aided
Design, vol. 35(7), pp. 673 -- 92.
[38] Taubin G. (1991), Estimation of Planar Curves, Surfaces, and Nonplanar
Space Curves Defined by Implicit Equations, with Applications to Edge and
Range Image Segmentation, IEEE Trans. Patter Analysis and Machine In-
telligence, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1115 -- 1138.
[39] Taubin G., Cooper D.B. (1992), Object Recognition Based on Moments
(or Algebraic) Invariants, Geometric Invariance in Computer Vision, J.L.
Mundy and A.Zisserman, eds., MIT Press, pp. 375 -- 397.
[40] Weiss I. (1993), Noise-Resistant Invariants of Curves, IEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 15, No. 9, pp. 943 -- 948.
19
|
1303.3076 | 1 | 1303 | 2013-03-13T02:15:44 | Higher Tannaka and Beyond | [
"math.AG"
] | We consider the origins of Higher Tannaka duality, as well as it consequences. In a first time we review the work of J. Wallbridge on that subject, which shows in particular that Hopf algebras are essential to generating Tannakian infinity-categories. While doing so we provide an analysis of what it means for Higher Tannaka to be a reconstruction program for stacks. Putting Wallbridge's work in perspective paves the way for causal models in Higher Category Theory. We introduce two interesting concepts that we deem to be instrumental within this framework; that of blow-ups of categories as well as that of fractal infinity-categories. | math.AG | math |
Higher Tannaka and Beyond
Renaud Gauthier ∗
September 17, 2018
Abstract
We consider the origins of Higher Tannaka duality, as well as it
consequences.
In a first time we review the work of J. Wallbridge
([W]) on that subject, which shows in particular that Hopf algebras
are essential to generating Tannakian ∞-categories. While doing so
we provide an analysis of what it means for Higher Tannaka to be a
reconstruction program for stacks. Putting Wallbridge's work in per-
spective paves the way for causal models in Higher Category Theory.
We introduce two interesting concepts that we deem to be instrumen-
tal within this framework; that of blow-ups of categories as well as
that of fractal ∞-categories.
∗[email protected]
1
1
Introduction
The origin of Tannaka duality can be found in [C], and from the perspective
of a reconstruction program, the duality theorems of Tannaka and Krein were
the first to show that some algebraic objects such as compact groups could
be recovered from the collection of their representations. Tannaka ([Ta])
showed that a compact group can be recovered from its category of repre-
sentations. Krein ([K]) worked on those categories that arise as the category
of representations of such groups. A nice account of Tannaka duality can be
found in [JS], with a formal development of the basis for a modern form of
Tannaka duality given in [DM]. It is worth giving the main result of that
latter paper to give a flavor of the Tannaka formalism. Deligne and Milne
considered a rigid abelian tensor category (C, ⊗) for which k = End(1) and
let ω : C → Veck be an exact faithful k-linear tensor functor. Such a pair
(C, ω) is otherwise known as a neutralized Tannakian category. They
showed that Aut⊗(ω) is represented by an affine group scheme G and that
the functor C → Repk(G) given by the fiber functor ω is an equivalence of
tensor categories. Papers of importance to us are given by [M] which intro-
duces Hopf algebras into the picture. One cannot omit [SR] from the list of
references, the first place where affine group schemes are introduced in the
Tannaka formalism. A first step towards a higher categorical generalization
of this formalism is made in [T1] and is further developed in [T3]. The use
of ring spectra and affine group stacks is exemplified in [W] which we use
as a basis for studying the causality of Tannaka duality theorems. Exten-
sion of the Tannaka formalism to that of geometric stacks has been done
by Lurie [L3] as well as in the more thorough [L4]. An interesting work in
the continuation of [W] is that of [I], where an application to motives is made.
We regard (∞, 1)-categories, heretofore referred to as ∞-categories, as
building blocks of any natural phenomenon. In other terms we are ultimately
interested in the phenomenology of higher Tannakian categories insofar as
once one knows what they do, one can essentially determine what they are.
We ask the simple question: given an ∞-Tannakian category and one of its
representations, is there some operation generating such a representation.
The answer to this question can be found in [W]. There is a functor from the
∞-category of certain group stacks to a particular ∞-category of pointed ∞-
categories. The group stacks G = Spec(B) in question, B being a certain kind
of Hopf algebra, are thus seen as being essential to the Tannakian formalism.
2
We reformulate this result as a reconstruction problem: if X , M are stacks,
π : X → M is a morphism of stacks, we seek to find stacks U (i), and
morphisms ω(i), i ≥ 1, such that in the following sequence:
X
❄π
M ∋ πX
✲ U (1)
ω(1) ∈ U (3)
❄
U (2)
ω(2)
❄
U (4)
r
r
r
r U (p)
❄
ω((p+1)/2)
we eventually recover X from the knowledge of πX only.
Tannaka duality is exemplified with the very short sequence:
In [W] Higher
X
G
B
❄
BG ✲ Mor( BG, Perf)
ω
❄
Mor(∗, Perf)
✲ End⊗ω ∈ TGpτ (R)
k
G
We then shift our attention to studying non-circular sequences of such mor-
phisms and view them as representative of a causality in Algebraic Geometry.
This motivates the introduction of categories with adjunctions between them
3
and morphisms above them such as in:
C−2
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
❲
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣✠
C0
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
❏
✡
♣
♣
✑
✑
♣
♣
✡
✡
♣✠
✡✡✢
✑✑✰
✛
C1
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✾
✑
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
✑
✑
✓
C−1
✓
✑
♣
✑
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
✑✑
✓
✓
❏
❏
❏❏❫
✲
✓
♣
♣
♣
♣
✓
♣✎
✓✓✴
C2
the collection of which forms a category that we denote by Cat, and which
we conjecture to be connected. Towards proving such a result we introduce
the concept of blow-up of a category, very much in the same spirit as the
algebro-geometric definition:
eCc = C − cSπ E(c)
yπ
C
c′ ∈ Ob(C), ψ not a composition}.
with E(c) = {c′ ψ
−→ c
Another model we introduce is that of fractal ∞-categories with non-
well founded set theory as a foundation. Those are Z-graded category-like
structures C(∗) such that for all n, C(n) has C(n−1) as an object as well as
all n-1-st categories C(n−1) has a morphism with. "Higher" morphisms are
functors between "lower" morphisms which gives credence to the term ∞-
category. The fractal-like presentation of such Z-graded categories leads to
the notion of fractal ∞-categories, the collection of which we also conjecture
to be connected. Disclaimer: there is an obvious bias in the references as we
have mentioned those that we deemed to be of greater importance. It does
not mean that those we didn't mention are any less important.
4
Acknowledgments. The author would like to thanks D. Yetter for sharing
its knowledge of Category Theory and related topics, and for enriching dis-
cussions. Thanks also go to J. Wallbridge for explicating parts of his paper
as well as to J. Bergner for giving very helpful comments on a preliminary
draft of this paper.
2 Wallbridge's Higher Tannaka Results with
Generalizations
If we consider higher Tannakian categories as being essential components of
any viable model of nature, is there some mathematical object that produces
such categories? The answer to that question is in the affirmative and can
be recovered from [W]. We provide the raw statement below. All notations
and background material can be found in the appendix.
Theorem 2.1. ([W]) Let τ be a subcanonical topology, TGpτ (R) the (∞, 1)-
category of R-Tannakian group stacks, (Tensrig
rigid R-tensor (∞, 1)-categories. One has an adjunction:
R )∗ the (∞, 1)-category of pointed
Fib∗ : (Tensrig
R )∗ ⇄ Gpτ (R)op : Perf∗
(1)
Perf∗ is fully faithful.
If R is an E∞-ring, then (T, ω) is a pointed finite
R-Tannakian ∞-category if and only if (T, ω) =Perf∗(G) for G a finite R-
Tannakian group stack.
2.1 Fleshing out the details: Tannaka and beyond
The ingredients of Wallbridge's higher Tannaka results are best understood
from the perspective of Brave New Algebraic Geometry (BNAG for short), a
specialization to stable homotopy theory of Homotopical Algebraic Geometry
(HAG for short) ([T2], [TV2], [TV3], [TV5]), a mathematical setting where
affine objects are modelled by homotopy-ring like objects. In particular, in
relative algebraic geometry one can do algebraic geometry over well-behaved
symmetric monoidal base categories, and this program has been initiated in
[TV1] for symmetric monoidal ∞-categories. Thus working with a site such
as (AffR, τ ) comes naturally to mind if one is interested in working in BNAG.
It is in [T1] and [T2] that we see some work done on AffM := (Comm(M))op,
M being a symmetric monoidal model category, the base category of some
5
HAG-like theory.
If one takes M to be the category of spectra, one does
BNAG. Thus working with E∞-rings is well-motivated, and in particular us-
ing (AffR, τ ), R an E∞-ring, as a site is well-motivated as well. In [T1] Toen
considered Tannaka duality within the context of BNAG. Algebraically, one
needs to consider algebraic group schemes. Hence the use of affine group
stacks in Wallbridge's framework.
We look at Tannaka duality as a recovery problem (read reconstruction)
that may be stated in broad terms as follows. We consider the very general
problem of having a stack X , a moduli stack M, a morphism X π−→ M, and
of having to recover X from the knowledge of πX . In order to achieve this we
adopt the point of view that it is necessary not to isolate πX but to compare
it to other appropriately chosen stacks. If U is one such stack, a comparison is
conveniently provided by the morphism space Mor(πX , U). Most likely this
will not be sufficient to determine X in full. Further comparisons may be
required. Under certain conditions, Mor(πX , U) itself is a stack that we can
compare to another stack of our chosing. We let U := U (1), Mor(πX , U) :=
U (2). If we have chosen another stack for comparison purposes, we denote
it by U (3). The comparison is then provided by considering Mor(U (2), U (3)).
We do this as many times as necessary in the hope that for some p finite
we end up having X as the image of some morphism ω ∈ Mor(U (p−1), U (p)).
This motivates the following definition:
Definition 2.1.1. Let X be a stack, M a moduli stack, π : X → M a
morphism of stacks. A volume of stacks for X is a sequence of stacks U (i),
i ≥ 1 defined inductively by setting Mor(U (n−1), U (n)) =: U (n+1) with U (1) be-
ing given and Mor(πX , U (1)) =: U (2). A given volume is called a bound vol-
ume for X if we can find a sequence of morphisms ω(n) ∈ Mor(U (2n), U (2n+1))
such that for some p finite the image of ω(p) ◦ · · · ω(1) in U (2n+1) is precisely
X . The binding is then given by the sequence of stacks U (i) and morphisms
ω(i). Failure to recover X from a volume gives us a loose volume. We
6
graphically represent a bound volume as follows:
X
❄π
M ✲ Mor(πX , U (1)) := U (2)
ω(1) ∈ Mor(U (2), U (3)) := U (4)
❄
U (3)
❄
U (5)
ω(2) ∈ Mor(U (4), U (5)) := U (6)
Mor(U (2n−2), U (2n−1)) := U (2n)
r
r
r
r
ω(n)
❄
X ∈ U (2n+1)
(2)
What [W] gives is a bound volume for Tannakian group stacks as we
will see. We see the Tannaka reconstruction as essentially recovering finite-
R-Tannakian group stacks G from their classifying stack BG.
It is true
that B has an adjoint Ω : Stτ (R) → Gpτ (R), that sends a stack F to
Ω(F ) : x 7→ ω(F (x)) where for an (∞, 0)-category X, ω(X) : [n] 7→ X ∆n
∗ .
What Wallbridge does is much more; he finds an inverse to B by comparing
BG to Perf, and then comparing Mor( BG, Perf) to Mor(∗, Perf). In doing so
Wallbridge does not see the morphisms spaces as stacks but as R-tensor cat-
egories instead. The last comparison is induced from the natural morphism
∗ → BG and is denoted ω. He proves End⊗ω = G.
Proposition 2.1.2. For X a finite-R-Tannakian group stack, π = B, M =
BG, one has a bound volume for G being provided by choosing U (1) = Perf,
U (3) = Mor(∗, Perf), ω(1) = ω as defined above and ω(2) is the morphism that
sends any morphism ψ to End⊗ψ.
7
Proof. This is a simple rewriting of Theorem 7.14 of [W]. Graphically:
G
B
❄
BG ✲ Mor( BG, Perf)
ω
❄
Mor(∗, Perf)
✲ End⊗ω ∈ TGpτ (R)
k
G
2.2 Analysis
Higher Tannaka as exposed by Wallbridge is a surprisingly fast way to recover
a finite-R-Tannakian group stack G from BG. This is owing to the fact that
End⊗ω is a representable Gp(S)-valued prestack, and thus an affine group
stack with respect to any subcanonical topology (Proposition 6.10 of [W]).
That justifies that one can close our bound volume in two steps only. The
proof of such a statement hinges on two nontrivial facts. The first is Lemma
6.9 whose proof involves arguing that symmetric monoidal ∞-categories are
given by the homotopy colimit of free symmetric monoidal ∞-categories over
∞-graphs ([W]), conveniently defined by a universal property. This intro-
duces maps into arbitrary symmetric monoidal ∞-categories in the picture.
If one picks Modrig
R to be one such category, one ends up having an equiv-
alence End⊗ω ≃ End(M) for M a rigid module, and being dualizable, this
latter object can be written Spec(Fr(M ⊗R M ∨)) where Fr: ModR → CAlgR
is the free functor, left adjoint to the forgetful functor CAlgR → ModR. The
other fact that is needed and is not obvious is that End⊗ω ≃ RAut⊗ω, and
this is true by virtue of Proposition 6.4 of [W](originally from [Sa]).
Proposition 4.6 of [W] is a pivotal point where we move from discussing
stacks BG and Perf to discussing symmetric monoidal ∞-categories, a set-
ting for which the ∞-graph discussion takes place. This proposition states
that for the site (AffR, τ ) and for Cat∞, a presentable symmetric monoidal
∞-category, then StCat∞(R) is tensored and enriched over Cat∞. That this
latter category is presentable is owing to the fact that it is the localization
of a combinatorial simplicial model category, P (Σ), a fact reminded to us
8
by Wallbridge. From that point on one can use the adjunction S ⇄ Cat∞
to see BG as an element not of Stτ (R) but of Stτ
Cat∞(R), from which it fol-
lows that one can invoke the fact that Mor( BG, Perf) really is an element of
Cat∞. From there it soon follows that it is also an element of Tensrig
R and
Wallbridge's program comes into effect.
If we come back to our general question of recovering a stack X from the
knowledge of πX , suppose we restrict ourselves to working in Homotopical
Algebraic Geometry. Suppose further we are interested in Stable Homotopy
Theory. Then it is natural to work within the confines of Brave New Algebraic
Geometry. Thus we can consider R to be an E∞-ring and we can work on a
site (AffR, τ ) as well, over which we construct stacks. X and M will be stacks
over such a site. Suppose we are given πX ∈ M. We initiate a volume for X .
A simple first stack to compare πX to is Perf. We consider Mor(πX , Perf).
If further M ∈ Stτ (R), then by Proposition 4.6 of [W], Mor(πX , Perf) can
be viewed as an element of Cat∞, and following the argument of Wallbridge
we find that it is an element of Tensrig
R . ω : Mor(πX , Perf) → Mor(∗, Perf)
we regard as a comparison that comes naturally to mind even if we do not
see it as being induced by the morphism ∗ → πX . From our persective
it amounts to comparing morphisms πX → Perf with the very elementary
morphisms ∗ → Perf. We impose that ω be a finite-fiber functor. Then
the pair (Mor(πX , Perf), ω) is a pointed finite R-Tannakian ∞-category and
Theorem 7.14 of [W] tells us we must have Mor(πX , Perf) = Mor( BG, Perf)
for G a finite R-Tannakian group stack. Thus what we obtain at best is a
local equivalence of πX with a classifying stack BG of a Tannakian group
stack G. Further End⊗ω = G, at the second stage in the volume for X . It
means an additional two comparisons such as above yields back G again and
thus provides a bound volume for G.
In the next section we go beyond Tannaka as this duality yields bound
volumes for Tannakian group stacks. What we are really interested in is
loose volumes. If we want to determine the origin of any given viable model
of nature one does not want to deal with bound volumes insofar as those do
not provide an origin but simply display a circularity in ideas that though
interesting from a duality perspective is not very illuminating for the purpose
of answering fundamental questions about causality.
9
3 Causality and Dynamics in Higher Cate-
gories
3.1 Conic towers of categories
Let Cat denote the category of all small categories. From Cat we construct
another category Cat, defined as follows. For objects we take small categories
that have an adjunction with at least one other small category, and for which
we can find a third category with a morphism to each of those two categories.
If C1 and C2 are two such categories between which there is an adjunction, C
is a category with a morphism to both categories, then both C1 and C2 are
viewed as objects of Cat, (though C may not be so as it may not necessarily
have an adjunction with another category). We first introduce morphisms in
Cat, informally before defining them in full. The triangle depicted below is
defined to be a morphism in Cat, between C1 and C2.
C
✡
✡
✡
✡✡✢
✛
C1
❏
❏
❏
❏❏❫
✲
C2
(3)
This is the simplest morphism we can have. From such a morphism we can
have another one if, writing C0 for C we can find a fourth category C−1 with
a morphism to C0, and by composition it would also have a morphism to C1
and C2 as well. We depict this as follows:
✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✾
✑
✑
✑
✓
✑
✑
✓
C−1
✓
✓
✓
✓
✑✑
❏
❏❏❫
✲
✓✓✴
C2
C0
✡
✡
❏
❏
✑
✑
✡
✡✡✢
✑✑✰
✛
C1
If we can find a fifth category C−2 with a morphism to C−1 then by com-
position C−2 also has a morphism to Ci, i = 1, 2, 0. This gives yet another
(4)
10
morphism between C1 and C2 which we depict as follows:
C−2
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
❲
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣✠
C0
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
❏
✡
♣
♣
✑
✑
♣
♣
✡
✡
♣✠
✡✡✢
✑✑✰
✛
C1
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✘✾
✑
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
✑
✑
✓
C−1
✓
✑
♣
✑
♣
♣
♣
♣
♣
✑✑
✓
✓
❏
❏
❏❏❫
✲
✓
♣
♣
♣
♣
✓
♣✎
✓✓✴
C2
(5)
By induction we can construct more elaborate morphisms between C1 and
C2 if given a morphism with topmost category C−p we can find yet another one
C−(p+1) with a morphism to C−p, and by composition to all lower categories
Ci, i = 1, 2, 0, −1, · · · , −(p − 1), −p as well.
If we arrange all these lower
categories in a circle, we obtain a cone with vertex C−(p+1). We can now
define a morphism between two small categories C1 and C2 of Cat, to be
given by an adjunction between them as well as a sequence of morphisms
C−p → C−(p−1) → · · · → C0, morphisms in Cat, with the last category C0
having a morphism to both C1 and C2 as in (3). A morphism between two
such objects of Cat, will also be referred to as a cone over C1 and C2 with
vertex C−p. Observe that we have been using the terminology "morphism
If C1
between objects" as opposed to saying "morphism from ...
and C2 are two objects of Cat,, with a morphism φ between them given in
part by an adjunction f : C1 ⇄ C2 : g, then we can talk about a morphism
from C1 to C2 as being φ where we regard f as being a left adjoint and g
a right adjoint. By symmetry, we can talk about this same φ as also being
a morphism from C2 to C1 with now g being a left adjoint and f a right
adjoint. For simplicity of notation, writing C → C′ will mean that there
exists a morphism between C and C′. The identity morphism is given by
the natural morphism from the trivial category ∅ to an object C of Cat,.
Composition of morphism is defined by the product of the vertices of each
to ...".
11
cone. If we have a morphism f between categories C1 and C2 given by a cone
with vertex C(1,2)
−p and a morphism g between C2 and C3 given by a cone with
vertex C(2,3)
, then the composition g ◦ f is given by the cone resulting from
taking the product of categories C(1,2)
−q as this category has a projection
to C(1,2)
, and thus to all lower categories by composition. This is
−p
represented as follows:
−p ×C(2,3)
and C(2,3)
−q
−q
C(1,2)
−p × C(2,3)
−q
✁
✁
✁
✁☛
❆
❆
❆
❆❯
C(1,2)
−p
✂
❆
❆
❆
❆❆❯
✲✛
✂
✂
✂✂✌
C1
C(2,3)
−q
✂
❆
✂
❆
❆
❆❯
✲✛
✂
✂✂✌
C2
C3
(6)
which yields a morphism from C1 to C3 as depicted below:
−p × C(2,3)
C(1,2)
✡
−q
❏
❏
❏
❏❏❫
✲
✡
✡
✡✡✢
✛
C1
C3
(7)
where for simplicity we have only displayed the vertex of the cone and all
intermediate categories and morphisms are implied. This definition of com-
position makes the identity morphism satisfy id ◦ f = f = f ◦ id for any
morphism f owing to the fact that for any category C, ∅ × C ≃ C ≃ C × ∅.
Associativity is also immediate and can be represented graphically with cones
12
only as done below:
(C(1,2)
−p × C(2,3)
−q ) × C(3,4)
−r
❈
❈
❈
❈
p2
❈
❈
❈❈❲
C(3,4)
−r
✄
✄
✄
✄
v
✡
✡
✡
✡
✄
✄
✄
✄
C4
✄
✄✄✎
×
✘
✙
(8)
C(1,2)
−p × C(2,3)
✡
−q
❅
p1
✡
✡✢
❅
❅❘
C(2,3)
−q
C(1,2)
−p
❏
❏
❏
❏❫
❄
×
C1
u
✬
✫
p1
✠
✓
✓
✓
✡
✡
✡
C2
×
✡
✓✴
✛
✘
✩
✙✛
✚
✪
✚
✡
✡✢
❄
×
C3
13
This cone is clearly equivalent to the following cone:
C(1,2)
−p × (C(2,3)
−q × C(3,4)
−r )
p2
❅
❅
✄
✄
✄
✄
✄
✄
✄
p1
✄
✄
✄✎
C(1,2)
−p
❅❘
C(2,3)
−q × C(3,4)
−r
✡
✡
✡
✡✢
C(2,3)
−q
p2
❄
C(3,4)
−r
✑
❏
❏
❏
❏❫
❄
×
C1
u
✬
✫
✓
✓
C2
×
✓
✓✴
✑
✑
✑✑✰
✛
✘
✩
✙✛
✚
✪
✚
❄
×
C3
×
C4
v
❄
✘
✙
(9)
One interesting peculiarity of Cat, is that for two objects C1 and C2 of Cat,
with a morphism Φ between them given in part by an adjunction f ⊣ g
where f : C1 ⇄ C2 : g, then Φ can equivalently be seen as a morphism
g : C2 ⇄ C1 : f . If Φ is seen as a morphism from C1 to C2 then f ⊣ g means
f is a left adjoint and g a right adjoint. Likewise if Φ is seen as a morphism
from C2 to C1, then g ⊣ f means g is left adjoint.
This may lead to confusion however. Consider the following diagram:
C1
φ
✲ C2
❩
❩
ζ
❩
❩
❩❩⑦
ψ
❄
C3
14
where φ is given in part by f12 : C1 ⇄ C2 : g12, ψ is given in part by
f23 : C2 ⇄ C3 : g23 and ζ is given in part by f13 : C1 ⇄ C3 : g13. Then ψ can
ψ⊃
be viewed as a morphism C3
−−→ C2 with g23 ⊣ f23 and the cone for ψ flipped
accordingly. One may be tempted to write:
φ
C1
❩
❩
ζ
❩
✲ C2
✻
❩
❩❩⑦
ψ⊃
C3
This is not possible however by definition of the composition of morphisms
in Cat,. If one were to accept a diagram such as this one then the horizontal
arrow would no longer be φ but another morphism ξ = ψ⊃ ◦ ζ with ζ itself
equal to the composition ψ ◦ φ. This rigidity is nevertheless a good thing
insofar as it enables one to keep track of previous compositions.
Recall that a category is said to be connected if it is inhabited and there is
a finite sequence of morphisms between any two of its objects. We generalize
this definition to the case of possibly infinite sequences of such morphisms
and state the following conjecture:
Conjecture 3.1.1. Cat, is a connected category.
We introduce a construction over Cat, which we anticipate to be instru-
mental in proving this conjecture. We first put a topology on Cat,.
3.2 Morphism topology on Cat,
Definition 3.2.1. Let X denote the number of products of categories re-
sulting from a composition in the cone associated to a morphism between
any two objects of Cat,.
Definition 3.2.2. A morphism metric d on Cat, is a function:
(cid:16)Ob(Cat,) × Ob(Cat,)(cid:17) ×Mor(Cat,) Arr(Cat,) → {0} ∪ N ∪ {∞}
(C1, C2, φ) 7→ d(C1, C2, φ) =
if C1 = C2, φ = idC1
if φ 6= id
if Hom(C1, C2) = ∅
0,
X(φ) + 1,
∞,
15
Clearly d(C1, C2, φ) = 0 ⇒ C1 = C2 and d(C1, C2, φ) = d(C2, C1, φ). Further
if there are morphisms φ between C1 and C2, and ψ between C2 and C3, then
d(C1, C2, φ) + d(C2, C3, ψ) = d(C1, C3, ψ ◦ φ). If there is no morphism between
at least one pair of categories above then the inequality ∞+X +1 = ∞ holds.
For C in Cat,, r ∈ N ∪ {∞}, we define the ball:
B(C, r) = {C′ φ−→ C d(C′, C, φ) < r}
Note that if r = 1, then:
B(C, 1) = {C′ φ
−→ C d(C′, C, φ) = 0} = {C (cid:9) idC}
and if r = ∞, then:
B(C, ∞) = {all C′ → C}
The collection of all balls B(C, r) for C ∈ Ob(Cat,), r ∈ N ∪ {∞}, forms a
basis for a topology on Cat, that we call the morphism topology.
3.3 Crystals of categories
In proving the connectedness of Cat,, one may wish to prove that the ge-
ometric realization of its nerve is a connected topological space.
In order
to better appreciate the geometric realization of the nerve of Cat,, we wish
to consider neighborhoods of each category defined by those morphisms for
which X = 0. We are led to consider the blow up of a category at an object,
which we define below:
Definition 3.3.1. Let C be a category, c an object of C. We define the blow
up of C at c to be the category
eCc = C − c[π
E
(10)
where the exceptional divisor E is defined to be the collection of objects of
C that are connected to c by at least one morphism, and of those morphisms
between c and any such object that do not result from a composition of
morphisms in C. We have a projection morphism π : Cc → C that is the
identity morphism away from c and projects E down to c. The gluing in eCc
is done via identity morphisms for those objects that are in E.
16
In our context, this becomes:
Definition 3.3.2. We define the blow up of Cat, at some object C to be
given by the category:
]
Cat,
C = Cat, − C[π
B(C, 2)
(11)
where B(C, 2) is really {C (cid:9) idC} ∪ {C′ φ
−→ C X(φ) = 0}. Morphisms
between any two objects of this category are defined to be the adjunctions
only of morphisms between the same objects in the base category Cat,.
Connecting such blowups for neighboring categories in Cat,, categories
for wich there is at least one morphism between them with X = 0, we obtain
what we call a crystal of categories. We abbreviate the word adjunction
in the definition that follows by the symbol ⊣.
Definition 3.3.3.
]
Cat,
X=0 = [X=0 ⊣′s
C∈Cat,
]
Cat,
C
(12)
Though not a category itself, this crystal of categories is a stackoid in
the following sense: for U an open set about an object C of Cat,, if we write
Fi =
]
Cat,
Ci, and if for any two objects Ci and Cj of U we have:
X=0−−−→ Cj
in U k ∈ K)
(13)
K an indexing set. Then we have:
U ∩ B(Ci, 2) ∩ B(Cj, 2) =( Cij;k
y
yX=0
Cij;k = Fj(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)Cij;k
Fi(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)Cij;k
Ci −−−→ C
]
Cat,
=
for all k ∈ K. Further such a descent datum is effective since
]
Cat,
X=0 as being easier to deal with than the original category
We regard
Cat, itself. Further, instead of proving the geometric realization of its nerve
to be connected, we think it would be somewhat easier to work with the
following object:
(14)
= Fi.
]
Cat,
C(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)Ci
17
Definition 3.3.4. The tangent stackoid of
]
Cat, is defined to be:
]
Cat,
T
X=0 := [X=0 ⊣′s
C∈Cat,
B(C, 2)
(15)
The tangent stackoid can be represented as an S∞ sphere which we define
below:
Definition 3.3.5. Within a given formalism, an S∞ sphere is an infinite
collection of points, each of which is connected (in a sense to be precised by
the context) to infinitely many other points.
]
Cat,
For T
X=0, fix C an object of Cat,, and pinch it out of B(C, 2) so
that one obtains a cone-like picture with C as its vertex. If we glue all other
X=0, by composition C
balls to B(C, 2) to obtain the tangent stackoid T
is connected to infinitely many other objects of Cat∞, hence the S∞ picture.
We write S∞[Cat,] for an S∞ in this formalism.
]
Cat,
f
−→ C2
f
−→ C2
g
−→ C3
f
−→ C2
g
−→ C3
g
−→ C3 and C2
For two morphisms f and g that can be composed as in C1
g
−→ C3,
the use of g follows that of f . This introduces a convenient notion of
time. We thus regard such a composition as a two steps process. We re-
fer to the composition of two X = 0 morphisms as an elementary com-
position. The composition of three X = 0 morphisms f , g and h as in
h−→ C4 is seen as the overlap of the following two elementary
C1
h−→ C4, the overlap happening
compositions: C1
over g. If there are morphisms between objects of a given category, to say
we use one of those morphisms means we consider the application of such
a morphism on a given source to obtain the corresponding target. To say
that overlapping elementary compositions are used quasi-simultaneously
h−→ C4 are two such elementary
means that if C1
compositions, once in the first composition g is being used, the second com-
position is being used also, starting by g of course. If there is a sequence
of elementary, overlapping compositions that is used quasi-simultaneously in
some category, then we say we have a flow along such a sequence. If such
a sequence is closed in the sense that such a sequence does not have a final
object, for example if it is cyclic, then the flow is said to be conservative.
g
−→ C3 and C2
f
−→ C2
g
−→ C3
18
In the case of Cat, if we have a flow along all closed sequences of morphisms,
and if in addition they can all be used simultaneously in a compatible man-
ner, then we say we have a flow on S∞[Cat,].
Conjecture 3.3.6. On S∞[Cat,] there is at least one flow. Further if there
is one flow, there is infinitely many others.
3.4 Fractal ∞-categories
In this subsection we do away with the axiom of regularity from Zermelo-
Frankel set theory ([F], [Z1], [Z2]) one of whose consequences is that no
set can be an element of itself since that is precisely what we aim to do in
what follows. An alternative to axiomatic set theory is found in non-well
founded set theories [Mi]. We do not regard the ZF axioms or those of non-
well founded set theories as mutually exclusive but rather as complementary
tools whose use is contextually warranted. Those axioms of non-well founded
set theories that are in contradiction with the axiom of regularity are called
anti-foundation axioms. We can mention Boffa's work in this regard ( [Bo1],
[Bo2]). We place ourselves within Boffa's universe B. What follows should
read as a research announcement.
We consider pointed Z-graded category-like objects that, for lack of a
better name we will simply refer to as uber-categories for reasons that will
become clear shortly. If we consider objects and morphisms only, an uber-
category is nothing but an ordinary category for which there is only one mor-
phism from one object to another. From that perspective, uber-categories are
constructed from ordinary categories following a "minimal" splitting princi-
ple; as soon as we introduce higher morphisms, a distinction is being made
in that if there exists two elementary morphisms f, g : a → b in a given
category C (elementary as in not a composition of other morphisms), a and b
being objects of C, and if there exists a 2-morphism τ : f ⇒ g, then we split
C into two categories, one consisting of f : a → b, the other of g : a → b,
each resulting category being an uber-category in disguised form.
Rather than obfuscate the reader with bewildering layers of definitions,
we will now delve into uber-categories proper rather informally, in the hope
that this will make it clear what an uber-category is, perhaps to the detriment
of more sophistication in the presentation, something we do not see as being
19
entirely necessary for the time being. If we regard the two categories above as
elements of a larger category with τ as a map from one to the other, these two
categories become uber-categories properly speaking in the sense that once
seen as elements of a larger category, their morphisms become objects of the
larger category, and higher morphisms such as τ become morphisms of the
larger category. In other terms, isolated uber-categories are simply ordinary
categories with objects and a single morphism between them. Embedded
within larger categories, their morphisms become objects of the larger cate-
gory. Identity morphisms and compositions are defined as in higher category
theory, and associativity is defined within the context of weak ∞-categories
at the very least, but preferably with (∞, 1)-categories in mind.
By induction, categories with pairs of objects between which there are
multiple elementary morphisms as well as at least one higher morphism from
one of those morphisms to another, will split as above into uber-categories,
each one displaying only one elementary morphism from the category it's orig-
inating from. Regarding notation, each uber-category resulting from such a
split will be labeled by its morphisms such as in C{fi}i∈I , I an indexing set
for the set of morphisms in such a category.
Concerning morphisms, given a n-morphism, n + 1-morphisms are mor-
phism objects of possibly yet another category, so we place ourselves within
the context of enriched category theory, with enrichments taking place at
each stage.
For n ∈ Z fixed, C(∗) one pointed Z-graded uber-category, C(n) is pointed
at C(n−1), one of its elements. Its other elements are all those (n-1)-st cat-
egories C(n−1) have morphisms with, a morphism φ(n−1) between C(n−1) and
another category D(n−1) being defined to be an adjunction fφ(n−1) : C(n−1) ⇄
D(n−1) : gφ(n−1), also denoted by fφ(n−1) ⊣ gφ(n−1). We do not label categories
by their morphisms for the time being, as they should, but by (n − 1) instead
to emphasize at which stage we are working. Suppose we have an elemen-
tary morphism µ(n−1) between two objects E (n−1) and D(n−1) of C(n). If in
addition to µ(n−1) there are other elementary morphisms between E (n−1) and
D(n−1), then we split C(n) into as many copies as there are other elementary
morphisms between E (n−1) and D(n−1). For µ(n−1) and ψ(n−1) two such mor-
phisms, we have two copies, one that we denote by C{··· ,µ(n−1),··· },(n), the other
20
C{··· ,ψ(n−1),··· },(n), with a morphism ξ(n) between them given by an adjunction:
fξ(n) : C{··· ,µ(n−1),··· },(n) ⇄ C{··· ,ψ(n−1),··· },(n) : gξ(n)
(16)
If such an adjunction is between C{··· ,µ(n−1),··· },(n) and C{··· ,ψ(n−1),··· },(n), viewed
as objects of some larger category C(n+1), then fξ(n) is an object of
HomC(n+1)(fµ(n−1), fψ(n−1)), and likewise gξ(n) is an object of
HomC(n+1)(gψ(n−1), gµ(n−1)).
Imposing that elementary morphisms between same objects split as op-
Indeed, for a
posed to non-elementary ones hold our categories together.
category C(n) pointed at C(n−1), suppose we have the following morphisms:
E (n−1)
× D(n−1)
✡✡✣
ψ
✡
✡
×
❆❑
φ
❆
✡
❆
×
C(n−1)
(17)
Then we have by composition (we work with adjunctions) a morphism from
E (n−1) to D(n−1) that makes this diagram commutative as in:
E (n−1)
ξ
q
q
q
q
q✏✏✶
× D(n−1)
✡✡✣
ψ
q
q
q
✡
✡
×
❆❑
φ
❆
✡
❆
×
C(n−1)
(18)
If we did not limit ourselves to elementary morphisms, then we would have
to split ψ and ξ ◦ φ, which would lead to a splitting of all morphisms, and
our categories would end up not being very interesting.
Another related question is the following. Given two categories C(n) and
D(n), C(q) pointed at C(q−1), D(q) pointed at D(q−1), such that C(p) is never an
element of D(p+1) for p < n, can we have a morphism between C(n) and D(n)?
21
Such a phenomenon we refer to as the sudden appearance of a morphism.
Recall that a category C not being an element of another category D means
that there is no morphism between C and the base category of D.
Proposition 3.4.1. There are no sudden appearances of morphisms for
pointed Z-graded uber-categories as defined above.
f
−→ C(n−1)
2
in C(n) to some D(n−1)
Proof. Let C(n) and D(n) be two such categories with a morphism τ between
them. Then by construction this morphism must be a higher morphism from
some C(n−1)
in D(n), where both
f and g are elementary morphisms. Further, we must have C(n−1)
= D(n−1)
,
i = 1, 2. We then have a morphism from the base point C(n−1) of C(n) to
C(n−1)
to
1
the base point D(n−1) of D(n), hence a morphism from C(n−1) to D(n−1). This
means C(n−1) must be an element of D(n), a contradiction.
, composed with f , followed by a morphism from D(n−1)
g
−→ D(n−1)
= C(n−1)
2
i
i
1
1
2
2
Pointed Z-graded uber-categories being constructed inductively, we could
very well have considered sequences of pointed uber-categories instead and
have worked with those objects. We will see how that approach is poten-
tially more amenable to obtaining a result about the connectedness of the
∞-category of such graded uber-categories below. We are more interested in
Z-graged uber-categories insofar as from a given rank n ∈ Z we can study
lower morphisms between lower categories. This amounts to studying the
causality of given morphisms at the n-th rank, with a tacit understanding
that original objects at the p-th rank for p negative and very large may not
necessarily be known. The problem however is that coherence conditions for
the associativity of morphisms make this formalism intractable computation-
wise.
Another approach is provided by considering sequences of categories in-
stead. The problem with that approach however is that a collection of cate-
gories {C(0)} is known at the onset, and causality becomes a non-issue. We
regard this formalism as a diminished variant of the above theory. Our view
is that from a causal perspective, once we go back further for smaller and
smaller values of the rank at which we are studying uber-categories and mor-
phisms between them, there is a point beyond which we can still refer to
the considered objects as uber-categories though we may not necessarily cur-
rently have the mathematical machinery required to fully describe the objects
thus obtained. This is why working with sequences of pointed uber-categories
22
is unrealistic in our opinion. However, that picture carries one very impor-
tant simplification. Precisely because we work with sequences and higher
categories and morphisms are defined and constructed inductively, it is pos-
sible to limit ourselves to (∞, 1)-uber-categories. For that purpose, we define
an adjunction f ⊣ g to be invertible if both f and g are invertible, and we
take the inverse of f ⊣ g to be f −1 ⊣ g−1. We define F Cat∞ to be the ∞-
category of Z-graded pointed uber-categories and higher morphisms between
them which we refer to as the category of fractal ∞-categories. The cat-
egory of (∞, 1)-sequences of pointed uber-categories we call the category of
fractal ∞-categories in positive degrees which we denote by F≥0Cat∞.
For questions of connectedness, we limit ourselves to sequences of uber-
categories. Observe that at a given rank, categories C(n) have a definite
knowledge of where they are coming from as C(k) is known for k < n, but from
the perspective of C(n), nothing is known about C(l) for l > n. This makes
proving a connectedness statement about F≥0Cat∞ difficult. We introduce
a notion of compactification that may be useful in that regard. Assuming
such a notion as f (∞) to make sense, if for all morphisms we have f (0) to be
isomorphic to f (+∞) then we can define a first compactification of F≥0Cat∞
to be defined by:
K1F≥0Cat∞ := F≥0Cat∞/Ob(0) ∼ Ob(+∞)
(19)
where objects at the 0-th and +∞ ranks are identified. Another compactifica-
tion is given by a one point compactification if for each object C(∗) of F≥0Cat∞
we can find a category C(−) such that it has C(+∞) as an object and for any
two elementary morphisms φ(+∞) and ψ(+∞) between two uber-categories
C(+∞) and D(+∞) respectively given by fφ(+∞)
: C(+∞) ⇄ D(+∞) : gφ(+∞)
and fψ(+∞) : C(+∞) ⇄ D(+∞) : gψ(+∞), we have a morphism µ(−) given by
fµ(−) : C(−) ⇄ D(−) : gµ(−) such that fµ(−) is a morphism between fφ(+∞) and
fψ(+∞) and likewise gµ(−) is a morphism between gψ(+∞) and gφ(+∞). Suppose
there is another morphism ρ(−) given by fρ(−)
: C(−) ⇄ D(−) : gρ(−). We
also need that both C(−) and D(−) be objects of C(0) and D(0), for which one
of the morphisms between them is given by an adjunction f (0) ⊣ g(0), f (0)
a morphism from fµ(−) to fρ(−).
In that case we can define the one point
compactification of F≥0Cat∞ as:
K2F≥0Cat∞ := F≥0Cat∞ aC∈F≥0Cat∞
23
{C(−), C(−) ⇄ D(−)}
(20)
Either compactification still yields a fractal ∞-category. Suppose that in
either case we obtain a disconnected fractal ∞-category.
In that case for
two disconnected components we can define a twist by an integer number p
by letting all categories and morphisms of either component be shifted by
p: C(n) 7→ C(n+p) and f (n) 7→ f (n+p). If for all p ∈ Z the corresponding com-
ponents are still disconnected then we say the original category F≥0Cat∞ is
totally disconnected.
Conjecture 3.4.2. F≥0Cat∞ is not totally disconnected.
This category offers a dynamic alternative to Cat,. Though we conjec-
ture this latter to be connected, we still regard F≥0Cat∞ as being of some
relevance for answering questions pertaining to causality in higher category
theory, though as we said above it is really F Cat∞ that is important. Fur-
ther we anticipate such a concept as fractal ∞-categories to be versatile and
to have applications in other branches of Mathematics.
3.5 Grothendieck topology on F Cat∞
We put a Z-graded Grothendieck topology on F Cat∞. In doing so we will
mainly follow [GM] as this is a standard reference. A first observation is that
since we work with enrichments of categories at each rank, it is natural to
have Grothendieck topologies for each rank, hence the notion of a Z-graded
Grothendieck topology. Fix n ∈ Z. We work within the n-th slice for the
time being.
For C(∗) an object of F Cat∞, we define the following family of morphisms:
Φ(n)(C(n)) = {all morphisms φi : C(n)
i → C(n)}
(21)
Proposition 3.5.1. The families of sieves {Φ(n)(C(n))}C∈F Cat∞ define
a Grothendieck topology on the n-th slice of F Cat∞.
Proof. By definition, the set of all morphisms to C(n) in the n-th slice of
F Cat∞ is precisely Φ(n)(C(n)), a covering sieve. Let Φ(n)(C(n)) be a covering
sieve. Let D(n) ψ(n)
−−→ C(n) be a morphism in the n-th slice of F Cat∞. We define
the restriction Φ(n)
D(n)(C(n)) of this sieve to D(n) to be the family of morphisms
φ(n)
i−−→ D(n) ψ(n)
is in Φ(n)(C(n)).
−−→ C(n) such that the composition ψ(n) ◦ φ(n)
C(n)
i
i
24
By definition however this is true for all φ(n)
D(n)(C(n)) = Φ(n)(D(n)).
Thus the restriction of a covering sieve is a covering sieve. Finally suppose
Φ(n)(C(n)) = {φ(n)
i → C(n)} is a covering sieve, Ψ(n) is another sieve
over C(n) such that the restriction Ψ(n)
i → C(n) is
C(n)
to any element φ(n)
so Φ(n)
: C(n)
: C(n)
i
i
i
i
ψ(n)
ji−−→ C(n)
to C(n)
j
i }. This being a covering
a covering sieve. We write Ψ(n)
= {D(n)
C(n)
i
sieve means that all morphisms from D(n)
morphisms φ(n)
then the same morphism between C(n)
C(n) → C(n)
ψ(n)⊃
constitute this family. If
i ⊣ g(n)
and C(n) can be viewed as a morphism
, which we write as
being a covering sieve means that it contains in particular
to C(n) are given in part by an adjunction f (n)
given in part by an adjunction g(n)
from C(n)
⊣ f (n)
j
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
. Then Ψ(n)
C(n)
i
ψ(n)⊃
i−−−→ C(n)
i
j → C(n)
all morphisms D(n)
. This means in such a sequence all
morphisms D(n)
j → C(n) are present. By definition of the restriction of a
sieve all such sequences composed with φ(n)
i → C(n) are in Ψ(n). Such
compositions are of the form D(n)
i where we have
a double composition of adjunctions, isomorphic to the identity morphism, so
all morphisms D(n)
j → C(n) are in Ψ, hence this latter is a covering sieve.
: C(n)
i
−−−→ C(n)
j → C(n) φ(n)⊃
φ(n)
−−→ C(n)
i
Definition 3.5.2. We denote by Φ(n) the Grothendieck topology on the n-th
slice of F Cat∞.
Definition 3.5.3. A Z-graded Grothendieck topology on an ∞-category
of Z-graded categories C(∗) is a collection {G(n)}n∈Z where each G(n) is a
Grothendieck topology on the n-th slice of such a category.
Proposition 3.5.4. Φ := {Φ(n)}n∈Z defines a Z-graded Grothendieck topol-
ogy on F Cat∞ making (F Cat∞, Φ) into a site.
Once that is achieved, one can study ∞-topos and stacks over this site.
Whether it be Cat, or F Cat∞, one needs to resort to "global" arguments,
and the study of topos we expect to be illuminating in that respect.
25
Appendix
We follow the notations used by Wallbridge as much as possible. Everything
below can be found in his paper [W] and we have only selected that which is
necessary for our purposes. The material of interest to us we have repackaged
for ease of use. Another reference we also use is [L1].
A ∞-categories
The higher generalization of classical category theory is fertile ground for
proving myriad problems in several seemingly disconnected mathematical
fields. The origins of such work can be found in [BV] and [J2] with very nice
reviews provided in [L1] and [B].
A (n, m)-category, m ≤ n, is a category in which all k-morphisms are
If one sets n = ∞ and m = 1 one deals with
invertible if m < k ≤ n.
(∞, 1)-categories, which one typically refers to as ∞-categories.
Definition A.1. ([L1], [BV]) An ∞-category is a simplicial set K with the
following extension property: for any 0 < i < n any map Λn
i → K from the
i-th horn of ∆n admits an extension ∆n → K.
An object of an ∞-category that is both initial and final is called a zero
object and is denoted by 0. An ∞-category is said to be pointed if it
contains a zero object. A pointed ∞-category with finite limits and colimits
for which pullback and pushout squares are the same is called a stable ∞-
category.
The theory of ∞-categories is equivalent to the theory of topological
categories ([L1]). Those are categories enriched over the category CG of
compactly generated, weakly Hausdorff topological spaces. The equivalence
exists by virtue of Theorem 1.1.5.13 of [L1]. The theory of ∞-categories is
also equivalent to the theory of simplicial categories ([L1]). These are
categories enriched over the category Set∆ of simplicial sets.
One important concept is that of the homotopy category hC of an ∞-
category C. There are two equivalent definitions of hC. One can first define a
26
notion of homotopic maps as follows: two edges φ : X → Y and φ′ : X → Y
in an ∞-category C are said to be homotopic if there is a 2-simplex σ :
∆2 → C:
Y
✒
φ
X
idY
❅■
❅
❅
✲
Y
φ′
The relation of homotopy is an equivalence relation on the edges between
same vertices of C ([L1]). One can define the homotopy category hC of an
∞-category C to be the category whose vertices are those of C and whose
edges are given by the sets of homotopy classes of morphisms between objects
of C. Or going back to the definition of an (∞, 1)-category, one can define
the homotopy category of a simplicial set, for which we need the definition
of the homotopy category of a simplicial category, which in turn necessitates
to define the homotopy category of a topological category. We define these
in turns.
One defines the homotopy category hC of a topological category C by
taking as objects those of C, and for two objects X, Y of C, one defines:
HomhC(X, Y ) = π0MapC(X, Y )
For instance if one considers the topological category C whose objects are
CW complexes and for objects X, Y of such a category MapC(X, Y ) is the
set of continuous maps from X to Y , then one refers to H = hC as the
homotopy category of spaces.
Observe as is done in [L1] that for X ∈ CG, the map that assigns to X
its homotopy class [X] gives a well-defined map θ : CG → H. From there
one can improve on the definition of the homotopy category of a topologi-
cal category by defining HomhC(X, Y ) = [MapC(X, Y )] instead of using path
components.
We can define the homotopy category of a simplicial category as done in
[L1] by applying a certain functor to each of the morphism spaces of this
27
category. Recall that one has a geometric realization functor:
Set∆
−→ CG
If C is a simplicial category, one defines its homotopy category hC as being the
H-enriched category following [L1] by applying the functor θ ◦ : Set∆ → H
to each of its morphism spaces.
Finally, in order to define the homotopy category of a simplicial set, one
first has to construct some simplicial category C[S] from a given simplicial set
S. This is not very illuminating, and the interested reader is refered to [L1]
for details. Then one just defines the homotopy category hS of a simplicial
set S to be the homotopy category hC[S].
Now if C and D are ∞-categories, one simply defines a functor from C to
D to be a map C → D of simplicial sets.
A functor F : C → D between two ∞-categories C and D is said to be
fully faithful if its underlying maps of simplicial sets is so. If F is regarded
as a map between simplicial sets, it is said to be fully faithful if the induced
map of homotopy categories hF : hC → hD is such that for all X, Y in C,
the induced map MaphC(X, Y ) → MaphD(F X, F Y ) is an isomorphism in H.
One way to also produce ∞-categories is to use model categories, which
we now define:
Definition A.2. ([L1], [H]) A model category is a category C equipped with
three distinguished classes of morphisms: fibrations, cofibrations and weak
equivalences. In addition, such a category satisfies the following axioms:
- C admits small limits and colimits.
- For any composition X
f−→ Y
g−→ Z, if any two of g ◦ f , f and g are
weak equivalences, so is the third.
- For a commutative diagram
X −−−→
X ′ −−−→
yg
r
r′
X
yf
Y
fy
i
i′
28
Y −−−→
Y ′ −−−→
for which r ◦ i = idX and r′ ◦ i′ = idY , then if g is any of a fibration,
cofibration, or a weak equivalence, then so is f .
- Given a diagram of solid arrows
X
i
❄
Y
✲
♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣✒
✲
X ′
p
❄
Y ′
one can find a diagonal arrow from Y to X ′ as above making the above
diagram commutative if either i is a cofibration and p is both a fi-
bration and a weak equivalence, or i is both a cofibration and a weak
equivalence and p is a fibration.
- Any map X → Y admits factorizations X i−→ Z
−→ Z ′ p′
fibration and weak equivalence) and X i′
weak equivalence, p′ fibration).
p−→ Y (i cofibration, p
−→ Y (i′ cofibration and
For instance the category Set∆ can be endowed with the Kan model
structure (in which case we denote Set∆ by Σ) for which cofibrations are
monomorphisms, fibrations f : X → Y are Kan fibrations, that is for any
diagram of solid arrows:
Λn
i
❄
∆n
X
f
❄
Y
✲
♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣✒
✲
one can find a dotted arrow as shown above that makes the diagram com-
mutative for all n and i, and finally a map f : X → Y is a weak equivalence
if the induced map of geometric realizations X → Y is a homotopy equiv-
alence of topological spaces.
The process whereby ∞-categories are produced from model categories
is called localization. In the following definition categories are regarded as
∞-categories in an obvious way.
29
Definition A.3. ([W]) Let C be an ∞-category, S a set of morphisms of C.
A localization of C along S is an ∞-category LSC together with a functor of
∞-categories l : C → LSC characterized by the following universal property:
for any ∞-category D, the map of internal Hom objects in the homotopy
category of ∞-categories
RHom(LSC, D) → RHom(C, D)
induced by l is fully faithful and its essential image is given by functors
F : C → D that send morphisms in S to an equivalence in D.
For M a model category, one lets LM be the localization of M along
the set of weak equivalences of M.
One important example of localization is provided as we will see below
by the localization of combinatorial simplicial model categories. Those are
model categories that are both combinatorial model categories and simplicial
model categories, two concepts we introduce presently. To define simplicial
model categories, we need the notions of monoidal model category and
of left Quillen bifunctor.
Definition A.4. ([L1]) If A, B and C are model categories, a functor F :
A × B → C is called a left Quillen bifunctor if F preserves small colimits
separately in each variable, and if for i : A → A′ and j : B → B′ cofibrations
in A and B respectively, the induced map:
i ∧ j : F (A′, B) aF (A,B)
F (A, B′) → F (A′, B′)
is a cofibration in C, and further if either of i or j is a trivial cofibration
(both a cofibration and a weak equivalence), then so is i ∧ j.
Definition A.5. ([L1]) A monoidal model category is a monoidal category
M equipped with a model structure for which the tensor product functor
⊗ : M × M → M is a left Quillen bifunctor, the monoidal structure on M
is closed, and the unit object 1 ∈ M is cofibrant. Recall that any model
category has an initial object ∅ and an object X of such a category has a
unique map ∅ → X which makes X cofibrant if this map is a cofibration.
30
One can enrich model categories over monoidal model categories. If M is
a monoidal model category, a M-enriched model category is a model category
C equipped with a model structure for which C is tensored and cotensored
over itself, and the tensor product ⊗ : C×M → C is a left Quillen bifunctor.
Definition A.6. ([L1]) If one endows the category Set∆ of simplicial sets
with the cartesian product and the Kan model structure, it becomes a monoidal
model category. A Set∆-enriched category is called a simplicial model cat-
egory.
Definition A.7. ([L1]) Let C be a category with all small colimits, S a class
of morphisms in C. One says that S is weakly saturated if the following
conditions are met: given a diagram
x −−−→
f
y
x′ −−−→
f ′
y
y
y′
such that f belongs to S, then so does f ′. If x is an object of C, α is an
ordinal, {zβ}β<α is a system of objects of the undercategory Cx/, if for β ≤ α,
x→β denotes a colimit in Cx/ of the system {xγ}γ<β, if for each β < α the
natural maps x→β → xβ belong to S, then so does the induced map x → x→α.
Finally for a commutative diagram
x −−−→ x′ −−−→ x
y −−−→ y′ −−−→ y
yf
yg
yf
for which both horizontal compositions are the identity, if g is in S, then so
is f .
Definition A.8. ([L1]) A model category C is said to be a combinato-
rial model category if it is presentable, there exists a set I of generating
cofibrations such that the collection of all cofibrations in C is the smallest
weakly saturated class of morphisms containing I, and if there exists a set
31
J of generating trivial cofibrations such that the collection of all trivial cofi-
brations in C is the smallest weakly saturated class of morphisms containing
J.
One defines a combinatorial simplicial model category to be a model
category that is both a combinatorial model category and a simplicial model
category.
Definition A.9. ([W]) An ∞-category is said to be presentable if it is
equivalent to the localization of a combinatorial simplicial model category.
Remark A.10. One could also have defined a presentable ∞-category as
done in [L1]: an ∞-category is presentable if it is accessible and admits
small colimits. Then for C an ∞-category, C is presentable if and only if it
is equivalent to N(A0), A0 the subcategory of fibrant-cofibrant objects in a
combinatorial simplicial model category A ([L1]).
One denotes by Catp
∞ the full subcategory of Cat∞ spanned by pre-
sentable ∞-categories.
An example of ∞-category that will be fundamental to us is provided by
symmetric monoidal ∞-categories. We will follow [W] closely to define
these. We denote by Ξ the category of pointed finite ordinals and point
preserving maps. We denote a pointed ordinal n`{∗} by n∗. One has a
monoidal category structure on Ξ given by (Ξ, ∨, 0∗). We denote by P(Σ)
the category of Σ-enriched precategories with the injective or Reedy model
structure as considered in [W] (see [L1] for details on these model structures).
Let p : C → Ξ be an object of P(Σ)/Ξ. An arrow F in C(a, b) is said to be
p-cocartesian if for all c ∈ C, the induced morphism
C(b, c) → C(a, c) ×Ξ(p(a),p(c)) Ξ(p(b), p(c))
is a weak equivalence in Σ.
An object p : C → Ξ in P(Σ)/Ξ is said to be a cofibered ∞-category
if for any morphism f : n∗ → m∗ in Ξ, for every object c ∈ C such that
p(c) = n there exists a cocartesian morphism F such that p(F ) is isomorphic
to f in the category Ξn∗/. For p : C → Ξ an object of P(Σ)/Ξ, we denote by
Cn∗ the fiber of p at n∗ ∈ Ξ. For all n ≥ 1 and 0 < i ≤ n one considers the n
pointed maps pi : n∗ → 1∗ in Ξ defined by pi(j) = {j} if j = i, ∗ otherwise.
Those maps induce natural maps (pi)↑ : Cn∗ → C1∗.
32
Definition A.11. ([W]) Let C be an ∞-precategory. A symmetric monoidal
∞-category is a cofibered object p : C → Ξ of P(Σ)/Ξ for which
Cn∗
∐i(pi)↑−−−−→ (C1∗)n
is an equivalence for all n ≥ 0.
An important example of symmetric monoidal ∞-category is given in [W]
and is the following. The category P(Σ) of Σ-precategories with the injective
or Reedy model structure is a model category for ∞-categories, and turns
out to be a symmetric monoidal simplicial model category for the carte-
sian product, from which it follows that its localization with respect to weak
equivalences, which is none other than the ∞-category Cat∞ of ∞-categories,
is itself a symmetric monoidal ∞-category.
An arrow f : n∗ → m∗ in Ξ is said to be inert if f −1{i} is a single
element, i ∈ m ∗ −∗. An arrow F in a symmetric monoidal ∞-category C is
said to be p-inert if F is a cocartesian arrow in C and p(F ) is inert in Ξ.
For two symmetric monoidal categories p : C → Ξ and q : D → Ξ, a functor
F : C → D for which the diagram
F
C
D
✲
q
❅
❅
p
❅❘
Ξ
✠
is commutative and for which F carries p-cocartesian arrows to q-cocartesian
arrows is said to be symmetric monoidal. It is said to be lax symmetric
monoidal if it carries p-inert arrows to q-cocartesian arrows. One denotes
by Cat⊗
∞ the ∞-category of symmetric monoidal ∞-categories and symmet-
ric monoidal functors.
For the purpose of studying Tannaka duality, we will restrict our attention
to ∞-categories that are rigid since for those a notion of duality can be
defined. One says that an object of a symmetric monoidal ∞-category C is
dualizable if it admits a dual in the homotopy category hC. A symmetric
monoidal ∞-category for which all objects are dualizable is said to be rigid.
33
B E∞-rings
Let C be an ∞-category with finite limits. One regards Z as a filtered cate-
gory. Let T be an endofunctor on C. Consider:
φ : RHom(Z, C) → RHom(Z, C)
F 7−→ φ(F ) : n 7→ φ(F )(n) = T (F (n + 1))
Definition B.1. ([W]) Let C be an ∞-category with finite limits, T an
endofunctor on C. A functor F : Z → C for which F → φ(F ) is an equivalence
in RHom(Z, C) is called a T-spectrum object of C.
Let C be a pointed ∞-category with finite limits. The loop functor Ω
of C is the endofunctor of C defined by:
Ω : x 7→ 0 ×x 0
Definition B.2. ([W]) If S∗ denotes the ∞-category of pointed spaces, a
spectrum is an object of Sp := SpΩ(S∗), the ∞-category of Ω-spectrum
objects of S∗.
For C a presentable ∞-category, the natural functor Evn : SpT (C) → C
has a left adjoint Frn : C → SpT (C). If ∗ denotes the final object of S, T = Ω
and C = S, then Fr0(∗) =: S is called the sphere spectrum. Sp can be en-
dowed with a symmetric monoidal structure uniquely characterized by the
conditions that S be the unit object of Sp and ⊗ : Sp × Sp → Sp preserves
colimits separately in each variable ([L2]).
One last ingredient needed before defining an E∞ ring is the concept of
commutative monoid object.
Definition B.3. ([W]) Let p : C → Ξ be a symmetric monoidal ∞-category.
A commutative monoid object in C is a lax symmetric monoidal section of p.
One denotes by CMon(C) the ∞-category of commutative monoid objects
in C.
Definition B.4. ([W]) A commutative ring spectrum, or E∞-ring, is a com-
mutative monoid object in the ∞-category of spectra endowed with the smash
product monoidal structure.
34
Now that we have seen what an E∞-ring is, we go back to the general
theory of commutative monoid objects. In [W] and [L2], for R a commutative
monoid object in a symmetric monoidal ∞-category C, a symmetric monoidal
∞-category p : ModR(C) → Ξ is defined, the ∞-category of R-modules of
C. The reader is referred to the references for details pertaining to the
construction of such a category. For our purposes we will retain that for such
a symmetric monoidal ∞-category, the unit object is canonically equivalent
to R and one has a relative tensor product over R denoted by ⊗R, leading
to a functor ([W]):
Mod(C) : CMon(C) → Cat⊗
∞
R 7→ ModR(C)
f : R → S 7→ − ⊗R S
A symmetric monoidal ∞-category C is said to be a presentable sym-
metric monoidal ∞-category if its symmetric product preserves small
colimits separately in each variable and the fibers Cn∗ are presentable ∞-
categories for all n > 0.
Definition B.5. ([W]) Let D be a presentable symmetric monoidal ∞-
category. A presentable ∞-category is said to be R-linear if one can give
it the structure of a ModR(D)-module object in Catp
∞.
C R-Tannakian group stacks
We will be interested in group stacks.
In this regard we will first go over
stacks as done in [W] and then study Tannakian Hopf algebras. If (C, τ ) is
a site, a topology τ on the ∞-category C is equivalent to having covering
families for all objects of C, with the added axioms that those families contain
equivalences, and are stable under compositions and base change. Let {ui →
x}i∈I be the covering family of some object x ∈ C, write u = Qi ui and
define the simplicial object:
u∗ : [n] 7→ u ×x · · · ×x u
Definition C.1. ([W]) If (C, τ ) is a site, X an ∞-category with limits, an
X-valued prestack F : C op → X is an X-valued stack if for all x ∈ C and all
coverings u∗ the map F (x) → lim∆ F (u∗) is an equivalence in X.
35
An S-valued stack will simply be referred to as a stack, and the ∞-
category of such stacks will be denoted by Stτ (C). Those topologies τ on
C for which every representable functor on C is a stack with respect to τ
are called subcanonical and will play an important role later. If one writes
AffC for CMon(C)op and one fixes a symmetric monoidal ∞-category D, then
AffR := AffModR(D) effectively corresponds to the opposite of the ∞-category
of commutative R-algebras in D, where R-algebras in D are simply defined
to be commutative monoid objects in ModR(D). This will be the category
on which we will construct stacks. To be more precise, we would like to
work with group stacks. That notion necessitates the introduction of the
notion of group objects in S. For an ∞-category C with pullbacks, a group
object G is a functor G : ∆op → C such that for all n ≥ 0 the canonical
map G([n]) → G([1]) ×G([0]) · · · ×G([0]) G([1]) is an equivalence in C, if it takes
every partition [2] = {P ∪ P ′P ∩ P ′ = {x}, x ∈ P } to a diagram
G([2]) −−−→ G(P ′)
G(P ) −−−→ G({x})
y
y
and finally if G([0]) is a terminal object in C. Let Gp(S) be the ∞-category
of group objects of S. A Gp(S)-valued stack will be called a group stack by
virtue of the equivalence between Gp(Pr(C)) and RHom(C op, Gp(S)) ([W]),
and the ∞-category of group stacks on an ∞-category C will be denoted
by Gpτ (C). One denotes by Gpτ (R) := Gpτ (AffR) the ∞-category of group
stacks on the site (AffR, τ ) of commutative R-algebras.
Among the topologies one can put on AffR, in this paper we are interested
in the finite topology ([W]). Thus we have to define what are finite coverings.
Let R be an E∞-ring and A → B a map of R-algebras. Consider the base
change functor
B ⊗A − : ModA → ModB
M 7→ B ⊗A M
Such a map is said to be conservative if B ⊗A M ≃ 0 if and only if M ≃ 0.
For R an E∞-ring, A an R-algebra, an A-module M is said to be finite
if the functor − ⊗A M : ModA → ModA preserve all small limits. A map
36
A → B of R-algebras is said to be finite if B is finite when considered as
an A-module. For R an E∞-ring, a finite family of maps {A → Bi}i∈I of
R-algebras is said to be a finite covering if A → Bi is finite and conservative
for all i ∈ I.
Definition C.2. ([W]) Let R be an E∞-ring. Finite coverings define a topol-
ogy on AffR referred to as the finite topology.
Remark C.3. It is implied in this notation that AffR = AffModR(D) with
D =Sp.
For R an E∞ ring, the prestack
Mod : Affop
R → Cat∞
A 7→ ModA
(A → B) 7→ B ⊗A −
(22)
is a stack of ∞-categories over AffR with respect to the finite topology.
Definition C.4. ([W]) For C a symmetric monoidal ∞-category, R a com-
mutative monoid object in C, a Hopf R-algebra in C is a cogroup object
in the symmetric monoidal ∞-category of commutative R-algebras in C.
Definition C.5. ([W]) Let C be a symmetric monoidal ∞-category. Let
(AffR, τ ) be a site. A Hopf R-algebra B in C is called a τ -Hopf R-algebra
if B([1]) ∈ τ (R)
Recall that we defined AffC := CMon(C)op and if one uses the notation
C ∧ for the ∞-category of prestacks RHom(C op, S), then one denotes the
Yoneda embedding AffC → (AffC)∧ by Spec. For (C, τ ) a site, Pr(C) :=
RHom(C op, S), one can define a classifying prestack functor
B : Gp(Pr(C)) → Pr(C)
G 7→ BG : x 7→ B(G(x))
the stackification of which is called the classifying stack functor ([W]):
B : Gpτ (C) → Stτ (C)
For C and D symmetric monoidal ∞-categories, one writes End⊗(F ) =
Map(F, F ) in RHom⊗
Ξ (C, D).
37
D Connecting the dots
Definition D.1. ([W]) Let R be an E∞-ring. A symmetric monoidal ∞-
category that is R-linear, stable and presentable is referred to as an R-tensor
∞-category. One denotes by Tens⊗
R the ∞-category of all such categories.
The stack Mod considered in (22) can be used to define a map
Mod : Stτ (R)op → Cat∞
F 7→ Mor(F, Mod)
where as done in [W] we use the same notation Mod for this map as the stack
Mod for simplicity of notation. The ∞-category Mor(F, Mod) is equipped
with a structure of R-tensor ∞-category and thus one has a well-defined
functor Mod : Stτ (R)op → Tens⊗
R the ∞-category of
rigid R-tensor ∞-categories. Following [W], if we restrict our attention to
rigid objects, one has a stack Perf: CalgR → Tensrig
R that sends a commutative
R-algebra A to the ∞-category Modrig
A of rigid A-modules, and the restriction
of the map Mod leads to a functor:
R. One denotes by Tensrig
Perf : Stτ (R)op → Tensrig
R
F 7→ Mor(F, Perf)
This functor admits a left adjoint
Fib : Tensrig
R → Stτ (R)op
C 7→ Hom(C, Perf)
with Fib(C)(A) = MapTensrig
R
(C, Modrig
A ) for a commutative R-algebra A.
One defines ωG : Mod( BG) → ModR and ωG : Perf( BG) → Modrig
R .
Let R be an E∞-ring. An affine group stack G = SpecB in Gpτ (R) is
said to be weakly rigid if End⊗(ωG) → End⊗(ωG) is an equivalence.
Definition D.2. ([W]) Let R be an E∞-ring, τ a subcanonical topology. A
group stack G in Gpτ (R) is said to be R-Tannakian if G = SpecB for a Hopf
R-algebra B, and is weakly rigid. It is further said to be finite-R-Tannakian
if it is R-Tannakian for a finite-Hopf R-algebra.
38
Let TGpτ (R) be the full subcategory of Gpτ (R) spanned by the R-
Tannakian group stacks. As an aside, it is not the fact that we use a Hopf
algebra that makes the group stack Tannakian, it is the weakly rigid condi-
tion. Rigidity is associated with a notion of duality which of course is what
the Tannakian formalism is all about.
We now come to the part where both the ∞-category and the algebraic
part get connected. For Tannaka duality to take place, we need to consider
fiber functors. We are thus led to define ([W]) pointed rigid R-tensor
∞-categories, pairs (C, ω) where C is a rigid R-tensor ∞-category and
ω : C → Modrig
R is a R-tensor functor referred to as a fiber functor. One
denotes by (Tensrig
R )∗ the category spanned by such pairs. We also need the
following map:
Fib∗ : (Tensrig
R )∗ → Gpτ (R)op
(C, ω) 7→ End⊗(ω)
That such a map is well-defined follows from a result of [W] which states
that End⊗(ω) is a representable Gp(S)-valued prestack, and thus an affine
group stack with respect to any subcanonical topology τ . Dually one has the
functor
Perf∗ : Gpτ (R)op → (Tensrig
R )∗
G 7→ (Perf( BG), f ∗)
where f : ∗ → BG induces the functor f ∗ : Perf( BG) → Modrig
functors give rise to an adjunction ([W]):
R . Those
Fib∗ : (Tensrig
R )∗ ⇄ Gpτ (R)op : Perf∗
Finally the pointed rigid R-tensor ∞-categories we work with have a
Tannakian-like behavior for a choice of three topologies, one of which is of
interest to us, the finite topology.
Definition D.3. Let R be an E∞-ring. A pointed R-Tannakian ∞-
category for the finite topology is a pair (T, ω) for T a rigid R-tensor ∞-
category and ω : T → Modrig
R a finite fiber functor, meaning that the induced
functor Mod( BEnd⊗(ω)) → ModR is conservative and preserves small limits.
Once that is achieved, [W] asserts that (T, ω) = Perf∗(G), thus displaying
Tannakian group stacks as the generators of Tannakian ∞-categories.
39
References
[B]
Julia Bergner, A Survey of (∞, 1) Categories, Towards Higher Cate-
gories, IMA Volumes in Math. and its Applications, Springer (2010),
69-83.
[Bo1] M. Boffa, Les Ensembles Extraordinaires, Bulletin de la Societe Math-
ematique de Belgique, XX, 3-15, (1968).
[Bo2] M. Boffa, Forcing et Negation de l'axiome de Fondement, Memoire
Academie Sci. Belg., tome XL, fasc.7, 1972.
[BV] J.M. Boardman and R.M. Vogt, Homotopy Invariant Structures on
Topological Spaces, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 347, Springer Ver-
lag, Berlin - New York, 1973.
[C] C. Chevalley, Theory of Lie Groups, Princeton University Press, 1946.
[DM] P. Deligne and J.S. Milne, Tannakian Categories, Hodge Cocycles,
Motives and Shimura Varieties, Lecture Notes in Math. 900, Springer-
Verlag, Berlin 1982, 101-228.
[F] A.A. Frankel, Y. Bar-Hillel and A. Levy, Foundations of Set Theory,
2nd Ed., Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Math., North Holland,
1973.
[GM] S.I. Gelfand and Y.I. Manin, Methods of Homological Algebra, Springer
Monographs in Mathemathics, Springer-Verlag, New York (2003).
[H] M. Hovey, Model Categories, American Mathematical Society, Provi-
dence, RI, 1998.
[I]
Iwanari,
I.
Tannakization
arXiv:1112.1761v3 [math.AG].
in Derived Algebraic Geometry,
[J] A.
Joyal,
Theory
of
Quasicategories,
http://www.math.uchicago.edu/∼may/IMA/Joyal.pdf
[J2] A. Joyal, Quasi-categories and Kan Complexes, J. Pure and Appl. Al-
gebra, 175 (2005), 207-222.
40
[JS] A. Joyal and R. Street, An Introduction to Tannaka Duality and Quan-
tum Groups, Category Theory, Proceedings, Como 1990, Lecture Notes
in Math., 1488, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg 1991, 411-492.
[K] M. Krein, A Principle of Duality for a Bicompact Group and Square
Block Algebra, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, 69 (1949), 725-728.
[L1] Jacob Lurie, Higher Topos Theory, Ann. of Math. Studies, 170 (2009).
[L2] Jacob Lurie, Higher Algebra, math.harvard.edu/ lurie/papers/HigherAlgebra.pdf.
[L3] Jacob Lurie, Tannaka Duality for Geometric Stacks, arXiv/0412266v2
[math.AG].
[L4] Jacob
Lurie,
Tannaka
DAG
Duality
and
http://www.math.harvard.edu/lurie/papers/DAG-VIII.pdf
Theorems,
III:
Quasi-coherent
available
Sheaves
at
[M] S. Majid, Tannaka-Krein Theorem for Quasi-Hopf Algebras and other
Results, University of Cambridge, 1990.
[Mi] D. Mirimanoff, Les Antinomies de Russell et de Burali-Forti et le Prob-
leme Fondamental de la Theorie Des Ensembles, L'enseignement Math-
ematique, 19, 37-52 (1917).
[S]
B. Shipley, A Convenient Model Category for Commnutative Ring Spec-
tra, Contemp. Math., textbf346, 473-483, 2004.
[Sa] N. Saavedra, Categories Tannakiennes, Lecture Notes in Math., 265,
Springer (1972).
[SR] N. Saavedra Rivano, Categories Tannakiennes, Lecture Notes in Math.,
Vol 265, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1972.
[Ta] T. Tannaka, Ueber Den Dualitatssatz Der Nichtkommutativen Topolo-
gischen Gruppen, Tohoku Math. J. 45 (1939) 1-12.
[T1] B. Toen, Dualite de Tannaka Superieure I: Structures Monoidales,
http://ens.math.univ-montp2.fr/∼toen/tan.pdf.
[T2] B. Toen, Homotopical and Higher Categorical Structures in Algebraic
Geometry, arXiv/0312262v2 [math.AG].
41
[T3] B. Toen, The Homotopy Theory of dg-Categories and Derived Morita
Theory, Invent. Math. 167 (2007), 3, 615-667.
[TV1] B. Toen and G. Vezzosi, Algebraic Geometry over Model Categories,
arXiv/0110109 [math.AG]
[TV2] B. Toen and G. Vezzosi, Homotopical Algebraic Geometry: Topos The-
ory, arXiv/0207028 [math.AG]
[TV3] B. Toen and G. Vezzosi, From HAG to DAG: Derived Moduli Stacks,
arXiv/0210407 [math.AG]
[TV4] B. Toen and G. Vezzosi, Brave New Algebraic Geometry and Global
Derived Moduli Spaces of Ring Spectra, arXiv/0309145 [math.AG]
[TV5] B. Toen and G. Vezzosi, Homotopical Algebraic Geometry II: Geomet-
ric Stacks and Applications, arXiv/0404373 [math.AG]
[W] James Wallbridge, Tannaka Duality over Ring Spectra, arXiv:1204.5787
[math.AG].
[Z1] E. Zermelo, Untersuchungen uber die Grundlagen der Mengenlehre I,
Mathematische Annalen 65, 261-281 (1908).
[Z2] E. Zermelo, Uber Grenzzahlen und Mengenbereiche, Fundamenta Math-
ematicae 16, 29-47 (1930).
42
|
1508.01776 | 1 | 1508 | 2015-08-07T18:28:29 | Fibr\'e vectoriel de 0-corr\'elation pond\'er\'e sur l'espace $P^{2n+1}$ | [
"math.AG",
"math-ph",
"math-ph"
] | We study in this paper a new family of stable algebraic symplectic vector bundles of rank $ 2n $ on the complex projective space $P^{2n+1}$ whose classical null correlation bundles belongs. We show that these bundles are invariant under a miniversal deformation. We also study the sufficient cohomological conditions for a symplectic vector bundle on a projective variety to be stable. | math.AG | math |
FIBR ´E VECTORIEL DE 0-CORR ´ELATION POND ´ER ´E
SUR L'ESPACE P2n+1
MOHAMED BAHTITI
R´esum´e. Nous ´etudions dans cet article une nouvelle famille de fibr´es vectoriels symplectiques
alg´ebriques stables de rang 2n sur l'espace projectif complexe P2n+1 dont le fibr´e de corr´elation
nulle classique fait partie. Nous montrons que cette famille est invariante par rapport aux
d´eformations miniversales. Nous ´etudions ´egalement les conditions cohomologiques suffisantes
pour qu'un fibr´e vectoriel symplectique sur une vari´et´e projective soit stable.
ABSTRACT. We study in this paper a new family of stable algebraic symplectic vector
bundles of rank 2n on the complex projective space P2n+1 whose classical null correlation
bundles belongs. We show that these bundles are invariant under a miniversal deformation.
We also study the sufficient cohomological conditions for a symplectic vector bundle on a
projective variety to be stable.
Date: August, 2015.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 14D21, 14D20, 14J60, 14F05, 14D15.
Mots-cl´es. fibr´e de corr´elation nulle, stabilit´e, d´eformation miniversale, espace de Kuranishi.
Key words. null correlation bundles, stability, miniversal deformation, Kuranishi space.
1. Introduction
Les fibr´es vectoriels alg´ebriques non-d´ecomposables connus de rang n − 1 sur l'espace projectif
complexe Pn pour n ≥ 6 sont rares. Les familles de fibr´es vectoriels seulement connues sont la
famille de fibr´es de Tango pond´er´es de rang n − 1 [9] et celle de fibr´es instantons de rang n − 1
pour n impair [24].
La famille de fibr´es instantons pr´esente un lien important entre la g´eom´etrie alg´ebrique et
la physique math´ematique, en particulier la th´eorie de Yang-Mills. Cette famille de fibr´es a
´et´e construite sur P3 par Atiyah, Drenfeld, Hitchin et Manin [6] et correspond, grace `a la
correspondance de Penrose-Ward, aux solutions auto-duales (instantons) des SU(2)-´equations
de Yang-Mills sur la sph`ere euclidienne S4 [6, 11, 4, 5]. Suite `a la g´en´eralisation de la correspon-
dance de Penrose-Ward sur l'espace projectif complexe de dimension impaire par Salamon [27],
la famille de fibr´es instantons a ´et´e g´en´eralis´ee sur P2n+1 par Okonek et Spindler [24]. Ensuite
Spindler et Trautmann ont ´etudi´e la famille de fibr´es instantons sp´eciaux [28].
1
2
MOHAMED BAHTITI
Les fibr´es instantons sp´eciaux de nombre quantique 1 sont des fibr´es de corr´elation nulle
classiques sur P2n+1 et sont la cohomologie de monades de type
0 −→ OP2n+1(−1) B−→ C2n+2 ⊗ OP2n+1
A−→ OP2n+1(1) −→ 0,
o`u
A =(cid:0) yn
. . . y0
; −xn
. . . xn
; y0
. . . −x0 (cid:1) , B =T (cid:0) x0
. . . yn (cid:1) ,
x0, x1, . . . , xn, y0, y1, . . . , yn ´etant des formes lin´eaires sans z´ero commun sur P2n+1.
En particulier nous nous int´eressons `a la g´en´eralisation de ces fibr´es qui ont ´et´e ´etudi´es sur P3
par Ein [12], sur P5 par Ancona et Ottaviani pour la premi`ere classe de Chern c1 = 0 [2] et qui
ont ´et´e d´efinis sur P2n+1 par Migliore, Nagel et Peterson [22]. Plus pr´ecis´ement, soient γ > 0
et ζ = 0, 1 et λi des entiers naturels pour i = 0, 1, 2, . . . , n tels que
γ − ζ > λn ≥ λn−1 ≥ . . . ≥ λ0 ≥ 0.
Soient gi ∈ H 0(P2n+1, OP2n+1(γ − λi − ζ)) et fi ∈ H 0(P2n+1, OP2n+1(γ + λn−i)) des formes
homog`enes sur P2n+1 sans z´ero commun sur P2n+1. Les fibr´es de corr´elation nulle pond´er´es
(les fibr´es de 0-corr´elation pond´er´es) sont la cohomologie de monades de type
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ − ζ) B−→ Hζ
A−→ OP2n+1(γ) −→ 0,
o`u
et
A =(cid:0) gn
. . . g0
; −fn
. . . −f0 (cid:1) , B =T (cid:0) f0
. . . fn
; g0
. . . gn (cid:1) ,
Hζ :=
nMi=0
(OP2n+1(λn−i)) ⊕
nMi=0
(OP2n+1(−λi − ζ)) .
La cohomologie Nζ de la monade pr´ec´edente est un fibr´e vectoriel symplectique normalis´e de
rang 2n sur P2n+1 pour laquelle les conditions suivantes sont ´equivalentes (th´eor`eme 4.13)
I- γ − ζn >Pn
i=0 λi.
II- Nζ est stable.
III- Nζ est simple.
Les d´eformations miniversales d'un tel fibr´e Nζ sont encore des fibr´es de 0-corr´elation pond´er´es
sur P2n+1 et l'espace de Kuranishi du fibr´e Nζ est lisse au point correspondant de Nζ (th´eor`eme
5.8). Les conditions cohomologiques suffisantes pour qu'un fibr´e vectoriel symplectique sur une
vari´et´e projective soit stable sont ´enonc´ees dans le th´eor`eme2.5.
Je tiens `a exprimer ma gratitude au directeur de ma th`ese M. J.-M. Dr´ezet et au professeur
G. Ottaviani pour des discussions utiles. Je remercie ´egalement toutes les personnes qui ont
contribu´e `a m'aider `a r´ealiser mes travaux. Cet article fait partie de ma th`ese.
FIBR ´E VECTORIEL DE 0-CORR ´ELATION POND ´ER ´E SUR L'ESPACE P2n+1
3
2. Pr´eliminaires
2.1. D´efinition. On d´efinit la r´esolution de Koszul g´en´eralis´ee de la suite exacte des fibr´es
0 −→ A −→ B −→ F −→ 0
par
0 −→ S i A −→ S i−1 A ⊗ B −→ S i−2 A ⊗
2^ B −→ S i−3 A ⊗
i−2^ B −→ A ⊗
3^ B −→ S i−4 A ⊗
i^ B −→
4^ B −→ . . .
i^ F −→ 0
i−1^ B −→
. . . −→ S 2 A ⊗
Soient rg(F ) = r, et c1(F ) = c. On a Vr−i F ∗ =Vr F ∗ ⊗Vi F =Vi F (−c). En tensorisant la
r´esolution de Koszul g´en´eralis´ee par Vr F ∗, on obtient une r´esolution pour Vr−i F ∗
0 −→ S i A(−c) −→ S i−1 A ⊗ B(−c) −→ S i−2 A ⊗
2^ B(−c) −→
S i−3 A ⊗
3^ B(−c) −→ S i−4 A ⊗
i−1^ B(−c) −→
i−2^ B(−c) −→ A ⊗
4^ B(−c) −→ . . .
i^ B(−c) −→
r−i^ F ∗ −→ 0
. . . −→ S 2 A ⊗
2.2. D´efinition. Soit E un fibr´e vectoriel de rang 2r sur une vari´et´e projective X. On dit que
le fibr´e E est symplectique si et seulement s'il existe un entier b ∈ Z et un isomorphisme de
fibr´es
ϕ : E −→ E ∗(b) tel que ϕ∗ = −ϕ.
Autrement dit, le fibr´e E est symplectique si et seulement s'il existe une forme symplectique non-
d´eg´en´er´ee ∈ H 0(V2 E(−b)). Dans ce cas, la premi`ere classe de Chern de E est c1(E) = br.
Nous allons d´evelopper les conditions cohomologiques suffisantes pour qu'un fibr´e vectoriel
symplectique de rang 2r sur une vari´et´e projective X soit stable. Le lemme suivant est une
g´en´eralisation de ([1], Lemme 1.10).
2.3. Lemme. Soit E un fibr´e vectoriel symplectique de rang 2r 2.2 sur une vari´et´e projective
X. Pour tout 1 ≤ j ≤ r − 1, le fibr´e OX est un suppl´ementaire dans le fibr´e V2j E(−bj) et le
fibr´e E est un suppl´ementaire dans le fibr´e V2j+1 E(−bj). Autrement dit, on a
2j^ E(−bj) ≃ OX ⊕ Bj
2j+1^ E(−bj) ≃ E ⊕ Aj.
Φ :
j+1^ E −→ E ⊗
j^ E
j+1Xi=1
1
j + 1
e1 ∧ . . . ∧ ej+1 7−→
(−1)j−i+1(e1 ∧ . . . ∧ bei ∧ . . . ∧ ej+1) ⊗ ei.
4
MOHAMED BAHTITI
D´emonstration. Pour tout i ≤ r. On a une forme non-d´eg´en´er´ee ∈ H 0(V2 E(−b)), donc on
peut d´efinir un morphisme injectif Φ qui est localement donn´e par
Φ :
i−2^ E −→
i^ E(−b)
e1 ∧ . . . ∧ ei−2 7−→ e1 ∧ . . . ∧ ei−2 ∧ .
Alors pour i = 2j, le fibr´e OX est un suppl´ementaire dans le fibr´eV2j E(−jb). Pour i = 2j + 1,
le fibr´e E est aussi un suppl´ementaire dans le fibr´e V2j+1 E(−jb).
2.4. Remarque. Pour tout fibr´e vectoriel, le fibr´e Vj+1 E est un suppl´ementaire dans le fibr´e
E ⊗Vj E, o`u j ≥ 0. C'est-`a-dire, on a un morphisme injectif localement donn´e par
(cid:3)
Le th´eor`eme suivant est une g´en´eralisation de ([1], th´eor`eme 3.5).
2.5. Th´eor`eme. Soient E un fibr´e vectoriel symplectique de rang 2r, E ≃ E ∗(b) o`u b ∈ Z, sur
une vari´et´e projective X avec P ic(X) = Z, et 1 ≤ 2j + 1 ≤ r un entier. On a
1- Soient b ≥ 0, et
I) h0(V2j+1 E) = 0,
II) h0(E(−b(j + 1)) ⊗V2j+1 E) = 1.
Alors E est stable (au sens de Mumford-Takemato).
2- Soient b ≤ 0, et
I) h0(V2j+1 E ∗) = 0,
II) h0(E ∗(b(j + 1)) ⊗V2j+1 E ∗) = 1.
Alors E est stable (au sens de Mumford-Takemato).
D´emonstration. 1- Pour b ≥ 0. Premi`erement, supposons que l'on ait Z1 un sous-faisceau de
fibr´e E de rang 2t1 + 1 qui d´estabilise le fibr´e E. D'apr`es la d´efinition de la stabilit´e on a
c1(Z1) = m1 ≥ 0, alors on a la suite exacte suivante
0 −→ Z1 −→ E −→ G −→ 0
o`u G est un faisceau sans torsion. En appliquant la r´esolution de Koszul 2.1, on a
0 −→
2t1+1^ Z1 −→
2t1+1^ E,
FIBR ´E VECTORIEL DE 0-CORR ´ELATION POND ´ER ´E SUR L'ESPACE P2n+1
5
qui donne le morphisme
on obtient
0 −→ OX (m1) −→
2t1+1^ E,
0
/ OX
V2t1+1 E(−m1)
w♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦
ϕ
#❍❍❍❍❍❍❍❍❍
V2t1+1 E
Donc le morphisme ϕ est une section de fibr´e V2t1+1 E, ce qui contredit h0(V2t1+1 E) = 0.
Deuxi`emement. Supposons que l'on ait Z un sous-faisceau de fibr´e E de rang 2t+2 et c1(Z) = m
qui d´estabilise le fibr´e E, alors on a la suite exacte suivante
(∗)
0 −→ Z −→ E −→ G −→ 0
o`u G est un faisceau sans torsion. En appliquant la r´esolution de Koszul 2.1, on a
0 −→
2t+2^ Z
f−→
2t+2^ E
g−→ G ⊗
2t+1^ E −→ . . .
qui donne
0 −→ OX(m − b(t + 1))
f−→
2t+2^ E(−b(t + 1))
g−→ G(−b(t + 1)) ⊗
2t+1^ E −→ . . .
la suite exacte suivante
o`u on a g.f = 0. En tensorisant la suite exacte (*) par le fibr´e V2t+1 E(−b(t + 1)), on obtient
2t+1^ E −→ 0.
2t+1^ E(−b(t+1)) −→ E(−b(t+1))⊗
h−→ G(−b(t+1))⊗
2t+1^ E
(∗∗)
0 −→ Z⊗
Mais d'apr`es la remarque 2.4 , on a
2t+2^ E(−b(t + 1)) ⊂ E(−b(t + 1)) ⊗
2t+1^ E,
alors on obtient que hV2t+2 E(−b(t+1)) = g. D'apr`es le lemme 2.3 , on obtient
OX ⊕ Bt
∼=
2t+2^ E(−b(t + 1)) ⊂ E(−b(t + 1)) ⊗
2t+1^ E,
qui donne, d'apr`es (II), h0(Bt) = 0. Donc on obtient que
f (OX(m − b(t + 1))) ⊂ OX , g(OX) = 0 et h(OX ) = 0.
En prenant la cohomologie de la suite exacte (**), on obtient la r´esolution suivante
0 −→ H 0(Z(−b) ⊗
2t+1^ E(−bt)) −→ H 0(E(−b) ⊗
2t+1^ E(−bt))
H 0(h)
−→
/
/
/
#
w
6
MOHAMED BAHTITI
H 0(G(−b(t + 1)) ⊗
2t+1^ E) −→ . . .
2t+1^ E(−bt) ≃ Hom(
2t+1^ E ∗(bt), E(−b)),
Comme
OX ⊂
2t+2^ E(−b(t + 1)) ⊂ E(−b) ⊗
alors on a un morphisme non nul ϕ : V2t+1 E ∗(bt) −→ E(−b) correspondant `a OX tel que
H 0(h)(ϕ) = 0. Donc il existe un morphisme surjectif ψ dans Hom(V2t+1 E ∗(bt), Z(−b))
project´e sur OX tel que
V2t+1 E ∗(bt)
ψ
&▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼
7♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣
0
ϕ
E(−b)
/ 0
Z(−b)
:✉✉✉✉✉✉✉✉✉
%❏❏❏❏❏❏❏❏❏❏❏
0
Mais c'est une contradiction au fait que la condition h0(E(−b(t + 1)) ⊗V2t+1 E) = 1 entraıne
que ϕ est le seul morphisme surjectif non nul project´e sur la suppl´ementaire OX (voir 2.3).
Donc E est stable.
2- Si b ≤ 0. On consid`ere ((E)∗)∗(−b) ≃ E ∗. Comme on a
h0(
2j+1^ E ∗) = 0, h0(E ∗(b(j + 1)) ⊗
alors, d'apr`es (1), E ∗ est stable. Donc E est stable.
2j+1^ E ∗) = 1
(cid:3)
2.6. Remarque. Soit E un fibr´e symplectique de rang 2r sur une vari´et´e projective X,
E ≃ E ∗(b) pour un b ∈ Z. Alors le fibr´e normalis´e de E est un cas parmi les deux cas suivants
- Soient b = 2m − ζ et ζ = 0, 1. Alors on a E(−m) ≃ (E(−m))∗(−ζ) et le fibr´e normalis´e de
E est E(−m) avec c1(E(−m)) = −ζr.
/
/
&
/
:
%
7
FIBR ´E VECTORIEL DE 0-CORR ´ELATION POND ´ER ´E SUR L'ESPACE P2n+1
7
3. Fibr´e vectoriel de 0-corr´elation pond´er´e
Soient V un espace vectoriel complexe de dimension 2n + 2, et P2n+1 = P(V ) l'espace projectif
complexe associ´e dont les points sont les droites de V . Soient γ > 0, n ≥ 1, ζ = 0, 1 et λi des
entiers naturels pour i = 0, 1, 2, . . . , n tels que
γ − ζ > λn ≥ λn−1 ≥ . . . ≥ λ0 ≥ 0.
Soient gi ∈ H 0(P2n+1, OP2n+1(γ − λi − ζ)) et fi ∈ H 0(P2n+1, OP2n+1(γ + λn−i)) des formes
homog`enes sur P2n+1 sans z´ero commun sur P2n+1. On consid`ere la (2n + 2) × 1-matrice
et la 1 × (2n + 2)-matrice
. . . fn
; g0
. . . g0
; −fn
. . . gn (cid:1)
. . . −f0 (cid:1)
B =T (cid:0) f0
A =(cid:0) gn
nMi=0
qui v´erifient A.B = 0. On consid`ere aussi le fibr´e
Hζ :=
(OP2n+1(λn−i)) ⊕
nMi=0
(OP2n+1(−λi − ζ)) .
On obtient un isomorphisme canonique Hζ ≃ H∗
ζ (−ζ). Tout cela nous donne la monade suivante
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ − ζ) B−→ Hζ
A−→ OP2n+1(γ) −→ 0.
On en d´eduit les suites exactes suivantes
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ − ζ) B−→ Hζ −→ Qζ;γ;λn,λn−1,...,λ0 −→ 0,
o`u Qζ;γ;λn,λn−1,...,λ0 est un fibr´e vectoriel de rang 2n + 1 sur P2n+1 et
0 −→ Nζ;γ;λn,λn−1,...,λ0 −→ Qζ;γ;λn,λn−1,...,λ0
A−→ OP2n+1(γ) −→ 0,
o`u Nζ;γ;λn,λn−1,...,λ0 est un fibr´e vectoriel de rang 2n sur P2n+1. Autrement dit, le fibr´e vectoriel
Nζ;γ;λn,λn−1,...,λ0 est la cohomologie de la monade pr´ec´edente. Le fibr´e Nζ;γ;λn,λn−1,...,λ0 a ´et´e
´etudi´e sur P3 par Ein [12], sur P5 par Ancona et Ottaviani pour ζ = 0 [2], et a ´et´e d´efini sur
P2n+1 par Migliore, Nagel et Peterson [22].
3.1. D´efinition. On appelle le fibr´e Qζ;γ;λn,λn−1,...,λ0 le fibr´e de quotient pond´er´e sur P2n+1 des
poids γ; λn, λn−1, . . . , λ0, et on appelle le fibr´e Nζ;γ;λn,λn−1,...,λ0 le fibr´e de 0-corr´elation pond´er´e
sur P2n+1 des poids γ; λn, λn−1, . . . , λ0 avec c1 = −ζn et d'une charge topologique
c2 = γ2 −
nXi=0
λ2
i + ζ(γ + ζ
n.(n − 1)
2
−
nXi=0
λi).
On va utiliser Qζ, Nζ `a la place de Qζ;γ;λn,λn−1,...,λ0, Nζ;γ;λn,λn−1,...,λ0 respectivement. On a donc
la monade suivante
(1)
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ − ζ) B−→ Hζ
A−→ OP2n+1(γ) −→ 0
8
MOHAMED BAHTITI
et les suites exactes suivantes
(2)
et
(3)
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ − ζ) B−→ Hζ −→ Qζ −→ 0,
0 −→ Nζ −→ Qζ
A−→ OP2n+1(γ) −→ 0.
On en d´eduit que c1(Qζ) = γ − ζn. Soit J une (2n + 2) × (2n + 2)-matrice symplectique
J =
−1
.
.
0
1
.
.
−1
0
.
.
1
.
Alors on a J 2 = −I et T B = −A(−ζ).J et T A = −J.B(−ζ).
3.2. Proposition. Le fibr´e de 0-corr´elation pond´er´e Nζ sur P2n+1 est un fibr´e symplectique.
D´emonstration. Le fibr´e N ∗
ζ est la cohomologie de la monade suivante
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ)
−J.B(−ζ)
−→ Hζ
−A(−ζ).J
−→ OP2n+1(γ + ζ) −→ 0
o`u J 2 = −I, T B = −A(−ζ).J et T A = −J.B(−ζ). Donc l'isomorphisme de monades suivant
0
0
/ OP2n+1(−γ − ζ)
B
/ Hζ
J
A
OP2n+1(γ)
I(−ζ)
/ OP2n+1(−γ − ζ)
−J.B(−ζ)
/ H∗
ζ (−ζ)
−A(−ζ).J
/ OP2n+1(γ)
0
/ 0
induit un isomorphisme ϕ : Nζ −→ N ∗
fl`eches verticales sont multipli´ees par −1. Donc on obtient T ϕ(−ζ) = −ϕ.
ζ (−ζ). En transposant le diagramme pr´ec´edent, les
(cid:3)
3.3. Proposition. Soient Qζ
0-corr´elation pond´er´e sur P2n+1 qui sont d´efinis par les suites exactes 2et 3. Alors on a
le fibr´e de quotient pond´er´e sur P2n+1 et Nζ
le fibr´e de
I) Qζ est stable si et seulement si γ − ζn > (2n + 1)λn.
II) Si Qζ est stable, alors Nζ est simple.
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
FIBR ´E VECTORIEL DE 0-CORR ´ELATION POND ´ER ´E SUR L'ESPACE P2n+1
9
D´emonstration. Le th´eor`eme 2.7, [7] donne (I).
Pour d´emontrer II), supposons que Qζ est stable. En tensorisant la suite 3 par Nζ, on obtient
la suite exacte suivante
0 −→ Nζ ⊗ N ∗
ζ −→ Qζ ⊗ N ∗
ζ
A−→ N ∗
ζ (γ) −→ 0.
Alors on a
h0(Nζ ⊗ N ∗
ζ ) ≤ h0(Qζ ⊗ N ∗
ζ ).
D'apr`es le lemme 2.3 et la proposition 3.2, on a que
1 ≤ h0(Nζ ⊗ N ∗
ζ ).
On tensorise la suite duale de la suite 3 par Qζ ce qui permet d'obtenir la suite exacte suivante
0 −→ Qζ(−γ)
Cependant, de la suite 2 on a
T A−→ Qζ ⊗ Q∗
ζ −→ Qζ ⊗ N ∗
ζ −→ 0.
Alors on a
h0(Qζ(−γ)) = h1(Qζ(−γ)) = 0.
h0(N ∗
ζ ⊗ Qζ) = h0(Q∗
ζ ⊗ Qζ).
Mais, Qζ est stable. On en d´eduit que h0(Nζ ⊗ N ∗
ζ ) = 1.
(cid:3)
3.4. Remarque. Pour la suite exacte 2, on a la r´esolution suivante
(4)
0 −→ OP2n+1(−(γ + ζ)q) −→ H(−(γ + ζ)(q − 1)) −→
. . .
a3−→
q−2^ H(−2(γ + ζ)) a2−→
q−1^ H(−(γ + ζ)) a1−→
o`u 1 6 q 6 2n + 1. Pour la suite exacte 2, on a aussi la r´esolution suivante
(5)
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ(2n + 2 − q) + ζ(−(n + 1) + q)) −→
aq−2−→
2^ H(−(γ + ζ)(q − 2))
aq−3−→ . . .
3^ H(−(γ + ζ)(q − 3))
q^ H a0−→
2n+1^ Hζ(−γ(2n + 1 − q) + ζq)
q^ Q −→ 0
−→
2n^ Hζ(−γ(2n − q) + ζq)
a2n−1−q−→
2n−1^ Hζ(−γ(2n − 1 − q) + ζq)
. . .
an+2−q−→
n+2^ Hζ(−γ(n + 2 − q) + ζq)
an+1−q−→
n+1^ Hζ(−γ(n + 1 − q) + ζq)
a2n−2−q−→ . . .
. . .
a3−→
q+3^ Hζ(−3γ + ζq) a2−→
q+2^ Hζ(−2γ + ζq) a1−→
an−q−→
n^ Hζ(−γ(n − q) + ζq)
q^ Q∗
q+1^ Hζ(−γ + ζq) a0−→
an−1−q−→ . . .
ζ −→ 0
10
MOHAMED BAHTITI
o`u 1 6 q < 2n + 1. Pour la suite exacte duale de la suite 3
(6)
on a la r´esolution suivante
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ) −→ Q∗
ζ −→ N ∗
ζ −→ 0,
(7)
0 −→ OP2n+1(−qγ) −→ Q∗
ζ(−γ(q − 1)) −→
ζ(−γ(q − 2))
2^ Q∗
aq−2−→
ζ(−γ(q − 3))
aq−3−→ . . .
. . .
a3−→
o`u 1 6 q 6 2n.
q−2^ Q∗
ζ(−2γ) a2−→
q−1^ Q∗
ζ(−γ) a1−→
3^ Q∗
q^ Q∗
ζ
a0−→
q^ N ∗
ζ −→ 0
FIBR ´E VECTORIEL DE 0-CORR ´ELATION POND ´ER ´E SUR L'ESPACE P2n+1
11
4. Stabilit´e de fibr´e de 0-corr´elation pond´er´e
Nous allons trouver les conditions n´ecessaires et suffisantes pour que le fibr´e de 0-corr´elation
pond´er´e Nζ sur P2n+1 soit stable.
4.1. Lemme. Soient p, q, k des entiers. Soit Hζ un fibr´e comme dans 3.1 pour ζ = 0.
I- Pour k ≥ γ et 1 ≤ q ≤ 2n + 1, on a
h0(Vq Hζ(−k)) = 0 si et seulement si γ >Pmin(q−1,n)
q^ Hζ(−k)) = 0 si γ >
nXi=0
h0(
i=0
λi.
λn−i. En particulier, on a
II- Pour k ≥ 2 et 1 ≤ p, q ≤ 2n + 1, on a
h0((Vp Hζ) ⊗Vq Hζ(−kγ)) = 0 si γ >Pn
D´emonstration. Pour d´emontrer (I), on a que
i=0 λi.
max{t ∈ Z OP2n+1(t) ⊆
q^ Hζ} =
min(q−1,n)Xi=0
λn−i.
Donc pour k ≥ γ, on obtient
h0(
q^ Hζ(−k)) = 0 si et seulement si γ >
min(q−1,n)Xi=0
λn−i.
En particulier, on a
Pour d´emontrer (II), on a que
h0(
q^ Hζ(−k)) = 0 si γ >
nXi=0
λi.
max{t ∈ Z OP2n+1(t) ⊆ (
Donc pour k ≥ 2, on obtient
p^ Hζ) ⊗ (
q^ Hζ)} =
min(q−1,n)Xi=0
λn−i +
min(p−1,n)Xi=0
λn−i ≤ 2
nXi=0
λi.
h0((
p^ Hζ) ⊗
q^ Hζ(−kγ)) = 0 si γ >
nXi=0
λi.
(cid:3)
12
MOHAMED BAHTITI
4.2. Lemme. Soient p, q, k, b, a des entiers. Soit Hζ un fibr´e comme dans 3.1 pour ζ = 1.
I- Pour k ≥ γ et 1 ≤ q ≤ 2n + 1 et 0 ≤ a ≤ n, on a
h0(Vq Hζ(−k + a)) = 0 si et seulement si γ − n >Pmin(q−1,n)
nXi=0
q^ Hζ(−k + a)) = 0 si γ − n >
h0(
i=0
λi.
λn−i. En particulier, on a
II- Pour k ≥ 2, 0 ≤ b ≤ n et 1 ≤ p, q ≤ 2n + 1, on a
h0((Vp Hζ) ⊗Vq Hζ(−kγ − b)) = 0 si γ − n >Pn
i=0 λi.
D´emonstration. La d´emonstration de ce lemme est tr`es similaire `a celle du lemme 4.1.
(cid:3)
4.3. Proposition. Soit Qζ le fibr´e de quotient pond´er´e sur P2n+1 qui est d´efini par la suite
exacte 2 pour ζ = 0. Soient 1 ≤ q ≤ n, 0 < i < 2n + 1 et k ≥ 0 des entiers. Alors on a
I- h0(Vq Q∗
II- Pour 0 ≤ k ≤ q, on a
ζ(−m)) = 0 si γ >Pn
q^ Q∗
hi(
v=0 λv, ∀m ∈ N.
ζ(−kγ)) =
0
ǫk,q
1
:
:
:
i 6= q
i = q 6= k
i = q = k
o`u ǫk,q = h1{ker[Hζ(γ(q − 1 − k)) −→ OP2n+1(γ(q − k))]}.
III- Pour k > q, on a
hi(
q^ Q∗
ζ(−kγ)) = 0.
D´emonstration. Pour d´emontrer (I), on consid`ere 1 ≤ q ≤ n, 0 < i < 2n + 1 et ∀m ∈ N et
ζ = 0. De la r´esolution 5, on obtient la r´esolution suivante
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ(2n + 2 − q) − m) −→ Hζ(−γ(2n + 1 − q) − m) −→
. . .
a3−→
q+3^ Hζ(−3γ − m) a2−→
a2n−1−q−→
3^ Hζ(−γ(2n − 1 − q) − m)
q+2^ Hζ(−2γ − m) a1−→
a2n−2−q−→ . . .
q+1^ Hζ(−γ − m) a0−→
q^ Q∗
ζ(−m) −→ 0.
Soit Ar = ker(ar) o`u r = 0, 1, . . . , 2n − 1 − q. Alors on obtient que hj(A0) = 0 pour j ≤ q.
Mais on a
2^ Hζ(−γ(2n − q) − m)
h0(
q+1^ Hζ(−γ − m)) = 0 si γ >
nXv=0
λv.
Donc on obtient, pour tout m ∈ N,
h0(
q^ Q∗
ζ(−m)) = 0 si γ >
nXv=0
λv.
FIBR ´E VECTORIEL DE 0-CORR ´ELATION POND ´ER ´E SUR L'ESPACE P2n+1
13
De plus on a hi(Vq Q∗
0 −→
ζ(−kγ) −→
q^ Q∗
3^ Hζ(γ(q −3−k))
. . .
b3−→
on obtient la r´esolution suivante, pour tout q > 0,
ζ(−m)) = 0 pour 0 < i ≤ q − 1. De la r´esolution duale de r´esolution 4
q^ Hζ(−kγ) −→
q−1^ Hζ(γ(1 − k))
bq−2−→
q−2^ Hζ(γ(2 − k))
bq−3−→ . . .
b1−→ Hζ(γ(q −1−k))
b0−→ O(γ(q −k)) −→ 0.
b2−→
2^ Hζ(γ(q −2−k))
On consid`ere Br = ker(br) pour r = 0, 1, . . . , q − 2. Alors on obtient
: q ≤ i ≤ 2n
i = q − 1
:
hi(Bq−2) =(cid:26)
h1(B0) = ǫk,q
0
Comme on a la suite exacte
0 −→
ζ(−kγ) −→
q^ Q∗
q^ Hζ(−kγ) −→ Bq−2 −→ 0,
alors on a, pour 0 ≤ k ≤ q et 0 < i < 2n + 1,
hi(
q^ Q∗
ζ(−kγ)) =
0
1
ǫk,q
:
:
:
q 6= i
i = q = k
sinon
Pour k > q et 0 < i < 2n + 1, on a
hi(
q^ Q∗
ζ(−kγ)) = 0.
(cid:3)
4.4. Proposition. Soit Qζ le fibr´e de quotient pond´er´e sur P2n+1 qui est d´efini par la suite
exacte 2 pour ζ = 1. Soient 1 ≤ q ≤ n, 0 < i < 2n + 1 et k ≥ 0 et 0 ≤ a ≤ n des entiers. Alors
on a
I- h0(Vq Q∗
ζ(−kγ − a)) = 0 si γ − n >Pn
II- Pour 0 ≤ k, a ≤ q, on a
v=0 λv.
hi(
q^ Q∗
ζ(−kγ − a)) =
0
1
ǫk,q,a
:
:
:
q 6= i
i = q = k = a
sinon
o`u ǫk,q,a = h1{Ker[Hζ(γ(q − 1 − k) + q − 1 − a) −→ OP2n+1(γ(q − k) + q − a)]}.
III- Pour k, a > q, on a
hi(
q^ Q∗
ζ(−kγ − a)) = 0.
D´emonstration. La d´emonstration de cette proposition est tr`es similaire `a celle de la proposition
4.3.
(cid:3)
14
MOHAMED BAHTITI
4.5. Proposition. Soit Nζ le fibr´e de 0-corr´elation pond´er´e sur P2n+1 qui est d´efini par la suite
exacte 6 pour ζ = 0. Pour 1 ≤ 2j + 1 ≤ n et m ≥ 0 des entiers,
I- Si on a γ >Pn
II- h1(V2j+1 Nζ(−γ)) = 1.
i=0 λi, alors on obtient que h0(V2j+1 Nζ(−mγ)) = 0.
D´emonstration. Pour d´emontrer (I), on fixe 1 ≤ 2j + 1 ≤ n, ∀m ∈ N et ζ = 0. On obtient, de
la r´esolution 7, la r´esolution suivante
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ(2j + 1 + m)) −→ Q∗
ζ(−γ(2j + m)) −→
2^ Q∗
ζ(−γ(2j − 1 + m))
a2j−1−→
3^ Q∗
ζ(−γ(2j − 2 + m))
a2j−2−→ . . .
. . .
a2−→
ζ(−γ(1 + m)) a1−→
ζ(−γm) a0−→
2j+1^ Q∗
2j+1^ Nζ(−γm) −→ 0.
2j^ Q∗
On consid`ere Ai = ker(ai) pour i = 0, 1, . . . , 2j − 1. Les termes dans cette r´esolution sont de
ζ(−γ(k + m)), o`u 0 ≤ k ≤ 2j, 1 ≤ q ≤ 2j + 1 tels que k + q = 2j + 1 et k 6= q.
la forme Vq Q∗
D'apr`es la proposition 4.3, on obtient que hk(V2j+1−k Q∗
ζ(−γ(k + m))) = 0. Comme
h2j+1(OP2n+1(−γ(2j + 1 + m))) = 0
alors on a hi+1(Ai) = 0, i = 0, 1, . . . , 2j − 1. De la suite exacte
0 −→ A0 −→
ζ(−γm) a0−→
2j+1^ Q∗
2j+1^ Nζ(−γm) −→ 0
i=0 λi, alors on obtient que
et comme h0(V2j+1 Q∗
ζ(−γm)) = 0 si γ >Pn
h0(
2j+1^ Nζ(−γm)) = 0 si γ >
nXi=0
λi.
Pour d´emontrer (II), on fixe m = 1 dans la r´esolution pr´ec´edente. On obtient la r´esolution
suivante
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ(2j + 2)) −→ Q∗
ζ(−γ(2j + 1)) −→
ζ(−γ(2j))
d2j−1−→
ζ(−γ(2j − 1))
d2j−2−→ . . .
3^ Q∗
dj+1−→
j+1^ Q∗
2j^ Q∗
j^ Q∗
2j−1^ Q∗
. . .
dj+2−→
ζ(−γ(j + 2))
ζ(−γ(j + 1))
dj−→
ζ (−γ(j))
dj−1−→ . . .
. . .
d3−→
ζ(−3γ) d2−→
ζ(−2γ) d1−→
ζ (−γ) d0−→
2j+1^ Q∗
2j+1^ Nζ(−γ) −→ 0.
On consid`ere Dα = ker(dα) pour α = 0, 1, . . . , 2j − 1. Les termes dans cette r´esolution sont de
ζ(−kγ) o`u 1 ≤ k, q ≤ 2j + 1 tels que k + q = 2j + 2.
la forme Vq Q∗
On a deux cas:
2^ Q∗
j+2^ Q∗
FIBR ´E VECTORIEL DE 0-CORR ´ELATION POND ´ER ´E SUR L'ESPACE P2n+1
15
Premier cas, si k ≥ q. Dans ce cas on obtient, d'apr`es la proposition 4.3, que
Donc ¸ca nous donne que hi(Dα) = 0 pour α ≥ j, i ≤ 2n − j, sauf pour i = α. On a
ζ (−kγ)) = 0 pour i 6= 0, 2n + 1.
hj+1(
ζ(−γ(j + 1))) = 1 , hi(Dj) = 0 , i = j + 1, j + 2.
hi(
q^ Q∗
j+1^ Q∗
De la suite exacte suivante
0 −→ Dj −→
ζ(−γ(j + 1)) −→ Dj−1 −→ 0,
on obtient que hj+1(Dj−1) = 1. Donc on obtient hα+2(Dα) = 1 pour α = 0, 1, . . . , j − 1.
Deuxi`eme cas, si k < q. D'apr`es la proposition 4.3, on obtient hi(Vq Q∗
i = k, k − 1 , 1 ≤ k ≤ j + 1. Alors on obtient que hα+2(Dα) = 1 pour α = 0, 1, . . . , j − 1.
Dans les deux cas: d'apr`es la proposition 4.3, on obtient que
ζ(−kγ)) = 0 pour
j+1^ Q∗
2j+1^ Q∗
2j+1^ Q∗
hi(
ζ(−γ)) = 0 pour i = 1, 2.
Donc d'apr`es la suite exacte suivante
0 −→ D0 −→
ζ(−γ) a0−→
on obtient que h1(V2j+1 Nζ(−γ)) = 1.
2j+1^ Nζ(−γ) −→ 0,
(cid:3)
4.6. Proposition. Soit Nζ le fibr´e de 0-corr´elation pond´er´e sur P2n+1 qui est d´efini par la suite
exacte 6 pour ζ = 1. Pour 1 ≤ 2j + 1 ≤ n, m ≥ 0 et 0 ≤ a ≤ n des entiers,
I- Si on a γ − n >Pn
II- h1(V2j+1 N ∗
i=0 λi, alors on obtient que h0(V2j+1 N ∗
ζ (−γ − (j + 1))) = 1.
ζ (−mγ − a)) = 0.
D´emonstration. Pour d´emontrer (I), on fixe 1 ≤ 2j + 1 ≤ n et ζ = 1. On obtient, de la
r´esolution 7, la r´esolution suivante
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ(2j + 1 + m) − α) −→ Q∗
ζ(−γ(2j + m) − α) −→
2^ Q∗
ζ(−γ(2j − 1 + m) − α)
a2j−1−→
3^ Q∗
ζ(−γ(2j − 2 + m) − α)
a2j−2−→ . . .
ζ(−γ(j + m) − α)
ζ (−γ(j − 1 + m) − α)
aj−1−→ . . .
j+1^ Q∗
aj+1−→
2j^ Q∗
j+2^ Q∗
aj−→
2j+1^ Q∗
. . .
a2−→
ζ(−γ(1 + m) − α) a1−→
ζ(−γm − α) a0−→
2j+1^ N ∗
ζ (−γm − α) −→ 0
16
MOHAMED BAHTITI
On consid`ere Ai = Ker(ai) pour i = 0, 1, . . . , 2j − 1. Les termes dans cette r´esolution sont de
ζ(−γ(k + m) − α), o`u 0 ≤ k ≤ 2j, 1 ≤ q ≤ 2j + 1 tels que k + q = 2j + 1 et k 6= q.
la formeVq Q∗
D'apr`es la proposition 4.4, on obtient que hk(V2j+1−k Q∗
ζ(−γ(k + m) − α)) = 0. Comme
h2j+1(OP2n+1(−γ(2j + 1 + m) − α)) = 0
alors on a hi+1(Ai) = 0 , i = 0, 1, .., 2j − 1. De la suite exacte
0 −→ A0 −→
ζ (−γm − α) a0−→
2j+1^ Q∗
et comme h0(V2j+1 Q∗
ζ(−γm)) = 0 , si γ − n >Pn
2j+1^ N ∗
ζ (−γm − α) −→ 0
i=0 λi, alors on obtient que
h0(
2j+1^ N ∗
ζ (−γm − α)) = 0 , si γ − n >
nXi=0
λi.
Pour d´emontrer (II), on fixe m = 1, α = j + 1 dans la r´esolution pr´ec´edente; on obtient la
r´esolution suivante
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ(2j + 2) − (j + 1)) −→ Q∗
ζ(−γ(2j + 1) − (j + 1)) −→
d2j−1−→
ζ(−γ(2j − 1) − (j + 1))
d2j−2−→ . . .
2^ Q∗
ζ(−γ(2j) − (j + 1))
ζ(−γ(j+2)−(j+1))
ζ (−γ(j+1)−(j+1))
ζ(−γ(j)−(j+1))
dj−1−→ . . .
ζ(−2γ − (j + 1)) d1−→
ζ(−γ − (j + 1)) d0−→
ζ (−γ − (j + 1)) −→ 0.
On consid`ere Di = Ker(di) pour i = 0, 1, . . . , 2j − 1. Les termes dans cette r´esolution sont de
ζ(−kγ − (j + 1)), o`u 1 ≤ k, q ≤ 2j + 1 tels que k + q = 2j + 2.
dj−→
j+2^ Q∗
2j+1^ N ∗
. . .
. . .
d2−→
dj+2−→
j^ Q∗
2j^ Q∗
la forme Vq Q∗
On a deux cas:
3^ Q∗
dj+1−→
j+1^ Q∗
2j+1^ Q∗
hi(
q^ Q∗
j+1^ Q∗
Premier cas, si k ≥ q. Dans ce cas, on obtient, d'apr`es la proposition 4.4, que
ζ(−kγ) − (j + 1)) = 0 pour i 6= 0, 2n + 1.
Donc ¸ca nous donne que hi(Dβ) = 0 pour β ≥ j, i ≤ 2n − j, sauf i = β. On a
hj+1(
ζ(−γ(j + 1) − (j + 1))) = 1 , hi(Dj) = 0 , i = j + 1, j + 2
et on a la suite exacte suivante
0 −→ Dj −→
ζ(−γ(j + 1) − (j + 1)) −→ Dj−1 −→ 0
j+1^ Q∗
On obtient que hj+1(Dj−1) = 1. Donc on obtient hβ+2(Dβ) = 1 pour β = 0, 1, . . . , j − 1.
Deuxi`eme cas, k < q. D'apr`es la proposition 4.4, on obtient
hi(
q^ Q∗
ζ(−kγ) − (j + 1)) = 0 pour i = k, k − 1 , 1 ≤ k ≤ j + 1.
FIBR ´E VECTORIEL DE 0-CORR ´ELATION POND ´ER ´E SUR L'ESPACE P2n+1
17
Alors on obtient que hβ+2(Dβ) = 1 pour β = 0, 1, . . . , j − 1. Dans les deux cas: d'apr`es la
proposition 4.4, on obtient que
Donc d'apr`es la suite exacte suivante
0 −→ D0 −→
ζ(−γ − (j + 1)) a0−→
hi(
2j+1^ Q∗
2j+1^ Q∗
ζ(−γ − (j + 1))) = 0 pour i = 1, 2.
on obtient que h1(V2j+1 N ∗
ζ (−γ − (j + 1))) = 1.
2j+1^ N ∗
ζ (−γ − (j + 1)) −→ 0,
(cid:3)
4.7. Proposition. Soit Qζ le fibr´e de quotient pond´er´e sur P2n+1 qui est d´efini par la suite
i=0 λi, alors on
exacte 2 pour ζ = 0. Soient α ∈ Z, 1 ≤ k ≤ n + 1 un entier. Si on a γ > Pn
obtient
- P our α = 1,
- P our α < 1,
- P our α > 1,
hi(Q∗
ζ ⊗
k^ Hζ(−αγ)) = 0, o`u 2 ≤ i ≤ 2n, ou bien i = 0.
hi(Q∗
ζ ⊗
hi(Q∗
ζ ⊗
k^ Hζ(−αγ)) = 0, o`u 2 ≤ i ≤ 2n.
k^ Hζ(−αγ)) = 0, o`u 0 ≤ i ≤ 2n.
D´emonstration. On fixe γ > Pn
On veut calculer les groupes cohomologiques du fibr´e
i=0 λi. Soient 1 ≤ k ≤ n + 1 un entier et α ∈ Z et ζ = 0.
De la suite exacte suivante
Q∗
ζ ⊗
0 −→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
k^ Hζ(−αγ) −→ Hζ ⊗
et d'apr`es le lemme 4.1:
k^ Hζ(−αγ).
k^ Hζ(−αγ) −→
k^ Hζ(γ(−α + 1)) −→ 0
si α ≤ 1, on a
si α > 1, on a
hi(Q∗
ζ ⊗
hi(Q∗
ζ ⊗
k^ Hζ(−αγ)) = 0, 2 ≤ i ≤ 2n,
k^ Hζ(−αγ)) = 0, 1 ≤ i ≤ 2n.
18
MOHAMED BAHTITI
Pour calculer h0(Q∗
la r´esolution suivante
0 −→
ζ ⊗Vk Hζ(−αγ)), on va utiliser la r´esolution 5 avec q = 1. Donc on obtient
k^ Hζ(−γ(α + 2n + 1)) −→ Hζ ⊗
3^ Hζ) ⊗
k^ Hζ(−γ(α+1)) d0−→ Q∗
k^ Hζ(−γ(α + 2n)) −→
k^ Hζ(−γ(α + 2n − 2))
k^ Hζ(−γ(α + 2n − 1))
k^ Hζ(−γ(α+2)) d1−→ (
k^ Hζ(−αγ) −→ 0.
2^ Hζ)⊗
d2n−3−→ . . .
d2n−2−→ (
ζ⊗
(
2^ Hζ) ⊗
3^ Hζ)⊗
. . .
d2−→ (
On consid`ere Dj = ker(dj) pour j = 0, 1, . . . , 2n − 2. D'apr`es le lemme 4.1, on obtient que
h1(D0) = 0 pour α ∈ Z. D'apr`es le lemme 4.1 et de la suite exacte suivante
0 −→ D0 −→ (
on obtient que, si α ≥ 1,
2^ Hζ) ⊗
ζ ⊗
k^ Hζ(−γ(α + 1)) d0−→ Q∗
k^ Hζ(−αγ)) = 0.
ζ ⊗
h0(Q∗
k^ Hζ(−αγ) −→ 0
(cid:3)
4.8. Proposition. Soit Qζ le fibr´e de quotient pond´er´e sur P2n+1 qui est d´efini par la suite
exacte 2 pour ζ = 1. Soient α ∈ Z, 2 ≤ k ≤ 2n + 1 et b < n des entiers. Si on a
γ − n >Pn
- P our α = 1,
i=0 λi, alors on obtient
- P our α < 1,
- P our α > 1,
hi(Q∗
ζ ⊗
k^ Hζ(−αγ − b)) = 0, o`u 2 ≤ i ≤ 2n, ou bien i = 0
hi(Q∗
ζ ⊗
hi(Q∗
ζ ⊗
k^ Hζ(−αγ − b)) = 0, o`u 2 ≤ i ≤ 2n.
k^ Hζ(−αγ − b)) = 0, o`u 0 ≤ i ≤ 2n.
D´emonstration. La d´emonstration de cette proposition est tr`es similaire `a celle de la proposition
4.7.
(cid:3)
FIBR ´E VECTORIEL DE 0-CORR ´ELATION POND ´ER ´E SUR L'ESPACE P2n+1
19
4.9. Proposition. Soit Qζ le fibr´e de quotient pond´er´e sur P2n+1 qui est d´efini par la suite
i=0 λi, alors on
exacte 2 pour ζ = 0. Soient α ≥ 0 et 1 ≤ q ≤ n des entiers. Si on a γ > Pn
obtient
- Pour α = 0,
hi(Q∗
ζ ⊗
q^ Q∗
- Pour α > 0,
ζ(−αγ)) = 0, o`u 2 ≤ i ≤ q − 1, ou bien i = 0 ou bien q + 1 ≤ i ≤ 2n.
hi(Q∗
ζ ⊗
q^ Q∗
ζ(−αγ)) = 0, o`u 0 ≤ i ≤ q − 1 ou bien q + 1 ≤ i ≤ 2n.
D´emonstration. On fixe γ >Pn
calculer les groupes cohomologiques du fibr´e
i=0 λi. Soient α ≥ 0 et 1 ≤ q ≤ n des entiers et ζ = 0. On veut
De la r´esolution 5, on obtient la r´esolution suivante
Q∗
ζ ⊗
ζ(−αγ).
q^ Q∗
0 −→ Q∗
ζ(−γ(α + 2n + 2 − q)) −→ Q∗
ζ ⊗ Hζ(−γ(α + 2n + 1 − q)) −→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
2^ Hζ(−γ(α + 2n − q))
b2n−1−q−→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
3^ Hζ(−γ(α + 2n − 1 − q))
b2n−2−q−→ . . .
. . .
b2−→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
q+2^ Hζ(−γ(α + 2)) b1−→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
q+1^ Hζ(−γ(α + 1)) b0−→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
q^ Q∗
ζ(−αγ) −→ 0.
On consid`ere Bm = ker(bm) pour m = 0, 1, . . . , 2n − 1 − q. D'apr`es la proposition 4.7, on a
alors
hi(B0) = 0, o`u 0 ≤ i ≤ q.
De la suite exacte suivante
0 −→ B0 −→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
q+1^ Hζ(−γ(α + 1))
b0−→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
q^ Q∗
ζ(−αγ) −→ 0
et d'apr`es la proposition 4.7 on obtient, si α = 0,
q^ Q∗
On obtient aussi, si α > 0,
hi(Q∗
ζ ⊗
ζ(−αγ)) = 0, o`u 2 ≤ i ≤ q − 1, ou bien i = 0.
hi(Q∗
ζ ⊗
On a la r´esolution suivante
q^ Q∗
ζ (−αγ)) = 0, o`u 0 ≤ i ≤ q − 1.
0 −→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
ζ (−αγ) −→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
q^ Q∗
q^ Hζ(−αγ) −→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
q−1^ Hζ(γ(−α + 1))
aq−2−→
Q∗
ζ ⊗
q−2^ Hζ(γ(−α + 2))
aq−3−→ . . .
20
MOHAMED BAHTITI
. . .
a2−→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
2^ Hζ(γ(−α + q − 2)) a1−→ Q∗
ζ ⊗ Hζ(γ(−α + q − 1)) a0−→ Q∗
ζ(γ(−α + q)) −→ 0.
On consid`ere Ar = ker(ar) pour r = 0, 1, . . . , q − 2. D'apr`es la proposition 4.7, on a alors
hi(Aq−2) = 0, o`u q ≤ i ≤ 2n.
De la suite exacte suivante
0 −→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
q^ Q∗
ζ(−αγ) −→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
q^ Hζ(−αγ) −→ Aq−2 −→ 0
et d'apr`es la proposition 4.7 on obtient, si α ≥ 0,
hi(Q∗
ζ ⊗
q^ Q∗
ζ(−αγ)) = 0, o`u q + 1 ≤ i ≤ 2n.
(cid:3)
4.10. Proposition. Soit Qζ le fibr´e de quotient pond´er´e sur P2n+1 qui est d´efini par la suite
exacte 2 pour ζ = 1. Soient α ≥ 0 et 1 ≤ q ≤ n et 2 ≤ d ≤ n des entiers. Si on a
γ − n >Pn
- Pour α = 0,
i=0 λi, alors on obtient
hi(Q∗
ζ ⊗
- Pour α > 0,
q^ Q∗
ζ(−αγ − d)) = 0, o`u 2 ≤ i ≤ q − 1, ou i = 0 ou q + 1 ≤ i ≤ 2n
hi(Q∗
ζ ⊗
q^ Q∗
ζ(−αγ − d)) = 0, o`u 0 ≤ i ≤ q − 1 ou q + 1 ≤ i ≤ 2n.
D´emonstration. La d´emonstration de cette proposition est tr`es similaire `a celle de la proposition
4.9.
(cid:3)
4.11. Proposition. Soit Nζ le fibr´e de 0-corr´elation pond´er´e sur P2n+1 qui est d´efini par la
suite exacte 6 pour ζ = 0. Soit 1 ≤ 2j + 1 ≤ n. Si on a γ >Pn
i=0 λi, alors on obtient que
h0(Nζ ⊗
2j+1^ Nζ) = 1.
i=0 λi et ζ = 0. D'apr`es le lemme 2.3 et la
D´emonstration. On fixe 1 ≤ 2j + 1 ≤ n et γ > Pn
proposition 3.2, on obtient que
De la suite exacte suivante
h0(Nζ ⊗
2j+1^ Nζ) ≥ 1.
2j+1^ Nζ −→ Nζ ⊗
0 −→
2j+1^ Nζ(−γ) −→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
2j+1^ Nζ −→ 0
FIBR ´E VECTORIEL DE 0-CORR ´ELATION POND ´ER ´E SUR L'ESPACE P2n+1
21
et suivant la proposition 4.5, il suffit de d´emontrer que
pour que l'on ait
h0(Q∗
ζ ⊗
h0(Nζ ⊗
De la r´esolution 7, on obtient la r´esolution suivante
2j+1^ Nζ) = 0
2j+1^ Nζ) = 1.
0 −→ Q∗
ζ(−γ(2j + 1)) −→ Q∗
ζ ⊗ Q∗
ζ(−γ(2j)) −→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
j^ Q∗
2j−1^ Q∗
Q∗
ζ ⊗
ζ(−γ(2j − 2))
µ2j−2−→ . . .
3^ Q∗
ζ ⊗
j+1^ Q∗
2j^ Q∗
ζ(−γ)
Q∗
ζ ⊗
ζ(−αγ),
q^ Q∗
. . .
µj+2−→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
ζ(−γ(j + 1))
µj+1−→ Q∗
ζ(−γ(j))
µj−→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
ζ(−γ(j − 1))
µj−1−→ . . .
. . .
µ3−→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
ζ (−2γ)
µ2−→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
µ1−→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
µ0−→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
On consid`ere Σm = ker(µm) pour m = 0, 1, . . . , 2j − 1. Les termes dans cette r´esolution sont
de la forme
2^ Q∗
ζ (−γ(2j − 1))
µ2j−1−→
j+2^ Q∗
2j+1^ Q∗
ζ
2j+1^ Nζ −→ 0.
o`u 0 ≤ α ≤ 2j, 1 ≤ q ≤ 2j + 1 ≤ n tels que q + α = 2j + 1 et q 6= α. D'apr`es la proposition
4.9, on a
hα(Q∗
ζ ⊗
2j+1−α^ Q∗
ζ(−αγ)) = 0 pour tout α, si γ >
nXi=0
λi.
Comme hi(Q∗
En utilisant la suite exacte suivante
ζ(−γ(2j + 1))) = 0 pour tout 0 ≤ i ≤ 2n, alors on obtient que h1(Σ0) = 0.
on obtient que
et
0 −→ Σ0 −→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
2j+1^ Q∗
ζ
µ0−→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
2j+1^ Nζ −→ 0,
h0(Q∗
ζ ⊗
2j+1^ Nζ) = 0,
2j+1^ Nζ) = 1 si γ >
h0(Nζ ⊗
nXi=0
λi.
(cid:3)
h0(N ∗
ζ (−(j + 1)) ⊗
h0(N ∗
ζ (−(j + 1)) ⊗
De la suite exacte suivante
la proposition 3.2, on obtient que
2j+1^ N ∗
D´emonstration. On fixe 1 ≤ 2j + 1 ≤ n et γ − n >Pn
2j+1^ N ∗
2j+1^ N ∗
2j+1^ N ∗
2j+1^ N ∗
et suivant la proposition 4.6, il suffit de d´emontrer que
ζ (−γ − (j + 1)) −→ Q∗
h0(N ∗
ζ (−(j + 1)) ⊗
2j+1^ N ∗
h0(Q∗
ζ(−(j + 1)) ⊗
pour que l'on ait
ζ(−(j + 1)) ⊗
0 −→
De la r´esolution 7, on obtient la r´esolution suivante
ζ(−γ(2j + 1) − (j + 1)) −→ Q∗
0 −→ Q∗
ζ ) = 1.
ζ ) ≥ 1.
ζ ) = 0
ζ ) = 1.
i=0 λi et ζ = 1. D'apr`es le lemme 2.3 et
ζ −→ h0(N ∗
ζ (−(j + 1)) ⊗
2j+1^ N ∗
ζ ) −→ 0
22
MOHAMED BAHTITI
4.12. Proposition. Soit Nζ le fibr´e de 0-corr´elation pond´er´e sur P2n+1 qui est d´efini par la
i=0 λi, alors on obtient que
suite exacte 6 pour ζ = 1. Soit 1 ≤ 2j + 1 ≤ n. Si on a γ − n >Pn
ζ ⊗ Q∗
ζ(−γ(2j) − (j + 1)) −→
Q∗
ζ ⊗
ζ(−γ(2j − 1) − (j + 1))
µ2j−1−→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
ζ(−γ(2j − 2) − (j + 1))
µ2j−2−→ . . .
. . .
µj+2−→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
ζ(−γ(j + 1) − (j + 1))
µj+1−→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
ζ(−γ(j) − (j + 1))
µj−→ . . .
2^ Q∗
j^ Q∗
3^ Q∗
j+1^ Q∗
. . .
µ1−→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
ζ(−(j + 1))
µ0−→ Q∗
ζ(−(j + 1)) ⊗
2j+1^ Q∗
2j+1^ N ∗
ζ −→ 0
On consid`ere Σm = Ker(µm) pour m = 0, 1, . . . , 2j − 1. Les termes dans cette r´esolution sont
de la forme
Q∗
ζ ⊗
ζ (−αγ − (j + 1)),
q^ Q∗
o`u 0 ≤ α ≤ 2j, 1 ≤ q ≤ 2j + 1 ≤ n tels que q + α = 2j + 1 q 6= α. D'apr`es la proposition 4.10;
on a
hα(Q∗
ζ ⊗
ζ(−αγ − (j + 1))) = 0, pour tout α
2j+1−α^ Q∗
Comme hi(Q∗
h1(Σ0) = 0. En utilisant de la suite exacte suivante
ζ(−γ(2j + 1)) − (j + 1)) = 0, pour tout 0 ≤ i ≤ 2n, alors on obtient que
0 −→ Σ0 −→ Q∗
ζ ⊗
2j+1^ Q∗
ζ(−(j + 1))
µ0−→ Q∗
ζ(−(j + 1)) ⊗
2j+1^ N ∗
ζ −→ 0
FIBR ´E VECTORIEL DE 0-CORR ´ELATION POND ´ER ´E SUR L'ESPACE P2n+1
23
on obtient que
Donc, on a
h0(Q∗
ζ(−(j + 1)) ⊗
2j+1^ N ∗
ζ ) = 0.
h0(N ∗
ζ (−(j + 1)) ⊗
2j+1^ N ∗
ζ ) = 1 si γ − n >
nXi=0
λi.
4.13. Th´eor`eme. Soient Qζ;γ;λn,λn−1,...,λ0
γ; λn, λn−1, . . . , λ0 et Nζ;γ;λn,λn−1,...,λ0
γ; λn, λn−1, . . . , λ0 qui sont d´efinis par les suites exactes suivantes
le fibr´e de quotient pond´er´e sur P2n+1 des poids
le fibr´e de 0-corr´elation pond´er´e sur P2n+1 des poids
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ) B−→ Hζ −→ Qζ;γ;λn,λn−1,...,λ0 −→ 0
0 −→ Nζ;γ;λn,λn−1,...,λ0 −→ Qζ;γ;λn,λn−1,...,λ0
A−→ OP2n+1(γ) −→ 0.
(cid:3)
Pour 1 ≤ 2j + 1 ≤ n, les conditions suivantes sont ´equivalentes
I- γ − ζn >Pn
i=0 λi.
II- Nζ;γ;λn,λn−1,...,λ0 est stable.
III- Nζ;γ;λn,λn−1,...,λ0 est simple.
D´emonstration. Pour ζ = 0.
(I) =⇒ (II). On fixe γ > Pn
i=0 λi. D'apr`es la proposition 3.2, le fibr´e Nζ;γ;λn,λn−1,...,λ0 est
un fibr´e symplectique. D'apr`es les propositions 4.5 , 4.11 et le th´eor`eme 2.5, on obtient que
Nζ;γ;λn,λn−1,...,λ0 est stable.
(II) =⇒ (III). Evident.
(III) =⇒ (I). On suppose que γ ≤ Pn
i=0 λi. On choisit γ0 ≤ P1
γ0 > λn ≥ λn−1 ≥ . . . ≥ λ0 ≥ 0. De la r´esolution 5, on obtient la r´esolution suivante
i=0 λn−i un entier tel que
2^ Hζ(−γ0(2n − 2))
a2n−3−→
a2n−4−→ . . .
ζ;γ0;λn,λn−1,...,λ0 −→ 0.
0 −→ OP2n+1(−2nγ0) −→ Hζ(−γ0(2n − 1)) −→
. . .
a3−→
5^ Hζ(−3γ0) a2−→
3^ Hζ(−γ0(2n − 3))
4^ Hζ(−2γ0) a1−→
3^ Hζ(−γ0) a0−→
2^ Q∗
On consid`ere Aj = ker(aj) pour j = 0, 1, . . . , 2n − 3. Du lemme 4.1, on obtient alors
hk(A0) = 0, 0 ≤ k ≤ 2.
De la suite exacte suivante
0 −→ A0 −→
3^ Hζ(−γ0) a0−→
2^ Q∗
ζ;γ0;λn,λn−1,...,λ0 −→ 0
De la r´esolution 7, on obtient la r´esolution suivante
0 −→ OP2n+1(−2γ0) −→ Q∗
ζ;γ0;λn,λn−1,...,λ0
b0−→
0 6= H 0(
ζ;γ0;λn,λn−1,...,λ0) 6= C.
2^ Q∗
ζ;γ0;λn,λn−1,...,λ0(−γ0) −→
2^ Q∗
2^ Nζ;γ0;λn,λn−1,...,λ0 −→ 0
24
MOHAMED BAHTITI
on obtient la suite exacte des cohomologies
0 −→ H 0(A0) −→ H 0(
3^ Hζ(−γ0)) a0−→ H 0(
2^ Q∗
ζ;γ0;λn,λn−1,...,λ0) −→ 0.
D'apr`es le lemme 4.1 on obtient H 0(V3 Hζ(−γ0)) 6= 0, car γ0 ≤P1
i=0 λn−i, ce qui nous donne
qui est ´equivalente aux deux suites exactes suivantes
0 −→ B0 −→
0 −→ OP2n+1(−2γ0) −→ Q∗
ζ;γ0;λn,λn−1,...,λ0
2^ Q∗
b0−→
2^ Nζ;γ0;λn,λn−1,...,λ0 −→ 0,
ζ;γ0;λn,λn−1,...,λ0(−γ0) −→ B0 −→ 0.
On obtient h0(B0) = 0, h1(B0) = 1. De la suite exacte de cohomologie des fibr´es
0 −→ H 0(
ζ;γ0;λn,λn−1,...,λ0) −→ H 0(
2^ Q∗
2^ Nζ;γ0;λn,λn−1,...,λ0) −→ H 1(B0) −→ 0,
on obtient que 0 6= H 0(V2 Nζ;γ0;λn,λn−1,...,λ0) 6= C. Mais, on a
H 0(
2^ Nζ;γ0;λn,λn−1,...,λ0) ⊆ H 0(Nζ;γ0;λn,λn−1,...,λ0 ⊗ Nζ;γ0;λn,λn−1,...,λ0).
Autrement dit, Nζ;γ0;λn,λn−1,...,λ0 n'est pas simple. Ce qui est une contradiction.
Pour ζ = 1, la d´emonstration dans ce cas est tr`es similaire `a celle pour ζ = 0.
(cid:3)
FIBR ´E VECTORIEL DE 0-CORR ´ELATION POND ´ER ´E SUR L'ESPACE P2n+1
25
5. D´eformation miniversale de fibr´e de 0-corr´elation pond´er´e
Tout en fixant ζ, nous allons d´emontrer que les fibr´es Qζ et Nζ sont invariants par rapport
`a une d´eformation miniversale. Nous allons aussi montrer que l'espace de Kuranishi du fibr´e
Nζ est lisse au point correspondant de Nζ. Pour ζ = 0, l'espace du module de fibr´e stable Nζ
sur P2n+1 est s´eparable topologiquement au point correspondant au fibr´e Nζ.
5.1. Th´eor`eme. (Hartshorne, [15]). Si F est un faisceau coh´erent sur un sch´ema projectif X
sur un corps de base K tel que hdF ≤ 1, il existe un sch´ema Y = Spec(R) qui param´etrise
les d´eformations miniversales de F , o`u R est une K-alg`ebre locale compl`ete.
D´emonstration. Voir le th´eor`eme (19.1 [15]).
(cid:3)
5.2. Th´eor`eme. Soit E un fibr´e vectoriel sur l'espace projectif Pn. Il existe Kur(E), un espace
de Kuranishi de E, qui est une base de la d´eformation miniversale de E. Autrement dit, Kur(E)
param´etrise toutes les d´eformations miniversales de E.
D´emonstration. Voir l'article de M. Kuranishi [20].
(cid:3)
Soit e un point correspondant au fibr´e E. Alors l'espace Kur(E) est ´equip´e d'une famille
universelle. La fibre (Kur(E), e), un espace topologique point´e, est unique `a un automorphisme
pr`es.
5.3. Lemme. Soient Q′
les suites exactes suivantes
ζ et Q′′
ζ deux fibr´es de quotient pond´er´e sur P2n+1 qui sont d´efinis par
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ − ζ) −→ Hζ
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ − ζ) −→ Hζ
q1−→ Q
′
ζ −→ 0
q2−→ Q
′′
ζ −→ 0
tels qu'il existe un morphisme ψ : Q′
que q2 ◦ ϕ = ψ ◦ q1.
ζ −→ Q′′
ζ . Alors il existe un morphisme ϕ : Hζ −→ Hζ tel
D´emonstration. De la deuxi`eme suite, on obtient la suite exacte suivante
0 −→ Hom(Hζ, OP2n+1(−γ − ζ)) −→ Hom(Hζ, Hζ)
q2 ◦ •
−→ Hom(Hζ, Q
′′
ζ )
Comme on a
alors on obtient que
−→ Ext1(Hζ, OP2n+1(−γ − ζ)) −→ 0.
Ext1(Hζ, OP2n+1(−γ − ζ)) = H 1(H∗
ζ (−γ − ζ)) = 0,
Hom(Hζ, Hζ)
q2 ◦ •
−→ Hom(Hζ, Q
′′
ζ ) −→ 0
Comme on a le morphisme ψ ◦ q1 : Hζ −→ Q′′
morphisme ϕ : Hζ −→ Hζ tel que q2 ◦ ϕ = ψ ◦ q1.
ζ qui est dans Hom(Hζ, Q′′
ζ ), donc il existe un
(cid:3)
26
MOHAMED BAHTITI
′ ∈ Hom(OP2n+1(−γ − ζ), Hζ) deux morphismes. Alors f et f ′ don-
5.4. Lemme. Soient f, f
nent le meme ´el´ement dans le sch´ema QuotHζ /P2n+1 si et seulement s'il existe un isomorphisme
g ∈ End(OP2n+1(−γ − ζ)) tel que f = f
′ ◦ g.
D´emonstration. C'est la d´efinition de sch´ema QuotHζ /P2n+1.
(cid:3)
Le th´eor`eme suivant est une g´en´eralisation du ([2], th´eor`eme 3.3) sur P2n+1.
5.5. Th´eor`eme. Soit Qζ ,0 un fibr´e de quotient pond´er´e sur P2n+1 qui est d´efini par la suite
exacte suivante
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ − ζ) x0−→ Hζ −→ Qζ ,0 −→ 0
o`u x0 ∈ Hom(OP2n+1(−γ − ζ), Hζ). Alors chaque d´eformation miniversale de fibr´e Qζ ,0 est
encore un fibr´e de quotient pond´er´e sur P2n+1. L'espace de Kuranishi de Qζ ,0 est lisse au point
correspondant de Qζ ,0.
D´emonstration. Soient x0 ∈ Hom(OP2n+1(−γ − ζ), Hζ) et Qζ ,0 = coker(x0) le fibr´e vectoriel
quotient pond´er´e correspondant au x0. Soit X un composant irr´eductible de QuotHζ /P2n+1 tel
que x0 ∈ X et y0 ∈ Kur(Qζ ,0) correspondant au fibr´e Qζ ,0. On a le morphisme de fibres suivant
π : (X, x0) −→ (Kur(Qζ ,0), y0)
D'apr`es le th´eor`eme 3.12, page 137 [26], on a
dimy0(Kur(Qζ ,0)) ≥ dimx0(X) − dimx0(π−1(y0)).
D'apr`es le th´eor`eme 2.2, page 126 [26], on a h1(E nd(Qζ ,0))) ≥ dimy0(Kur(Qζ ,0)). Soit
Z = {x1 ∈ X Qζ ,1 ≃ Qζ ,0 o`u Qζ ,1 est le fibr´e correspondant `a x1 }.
On obtient que
Donc on a
(π−1(y0), y0) ⊆ (Z, x0) et dimx0((π−1(y0), y0)) ≤ dimx0((Z, x0)).
dimy0(Kur(Qζ ,0)) ≥ dimx0(X) − dimx0((Z, x0)).
On a aussi dimx0(X) = h0(Hζ(γ + ζ)) − 1 = h0(Qζ ,0(γ + ζ)). Soit
Σ = {ψ ∈ End(Hζ) ψ.x0 = x0}.
D'apr`es les lemmes 5.3 et 5.4, on obtient que
dimx0(Z) = h0(E nd(Hζ)) − dimx0(Σ) − 1.
De la suite exacte de fibr´es vectoriels
0 −→ Q∗
ζ ,0 ⊗ Hζ −→ E nd(Hζ) −→ Hζ(γ + ζ) −→ 0,
on obtient la suite exacte suivante de groupes cohomologiques
0 −→ H 0(Qζ
∗
,0 ⊗ Hζ) −→ End(Hζ)
•◦x0−→ H 0(Hζ(γ + ζ)),
FIBR ´E VECTORIEL DE 0-CORR ´ELATION POND ´ER ´E SUR L'ESPACE P2n+1
27
qui nous donne
dimx0(Σ) = h0(Qζ
∗
,0 ⊗ Hζ).
De la suite exacte pr´ec´edente de fibr´es vectoriels, on obtient que
h1(Qζ
∗
,0 ⊗ Hζ) = h0(Hζ(γ + ζ)) − h0(E nd(Hζ)) + h0(Qζ
∗
,0 ⊗ Hζ).
Donc on a
dimy0(Kur(Qζ ,0)) ≥ h0(Hζ(γ + ζ)) − h0(E nd(Hζ)) + h0(Qζ
∗
,0 ⊗ Hζ) = h1(Qζ
∗
,0 ⊗ Hζ).
La suite exacte suivante des fibr´es vectoriels
0 −→ Qζ
∗
,0(−γ − ζ) −→ Qζ
∗
,0 ⊗ Hζ −→ E nd(Qζ ,0) −→ 0
nous donne que h2(E nd(Qζ ,0)) = 0 et H 1(Qζ
h1(Qζ
,0 ⊗ Hζ) ≥ h1(E nd(Qζ ,0)). Ensuite on obtient que
∗
∗
,0 ⊗ Hζ) −→ H 1(E nd(Qζ ,0)) −→ 0. Donc on a
dimy0(Kur(Qζ ,0)) ≥ h1(E nd(Qζ ,0)).
Autrement dit, dimy0(Kur(Qζ ,0)) = h1(E nd(Qζ ,0)) et Kur(Qζ ,0) est lisse en y0. De plus on a
dimy0(Kur(Qζ ,0)) = dimx0(X) − dimx0(π−1(y0)).
D'apr`es le th´eor`eme de la semicontinuit´e de fibres (12.8, page 288 [14]), on obtient que
dimy0(Im(π)) = dimy0(Kur(Qζ ,0)) et que π est surjectif. Cela implique que Qζ ,0 est invariant
par rapport `a une d´eformation miniversale.
(cid:3)
5.6. Lemme. Soit Qζ un fibr´e de quotient pond´er´e sur P2n+1. Soient N ′
ζ
0-corr´elation pond´er´e sur P2n+1 qui sont d´efinis par les suites exactes
∗ et N ′′
ζ
∗ des fibr´es de
et
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ) −→ Q∗
ζ
p1−→ N
′
ζ
∗ −→ 0,
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ) −→ Q∗
ζ
p2−→ N
′′
ζ
∗ −→ 0.
tels qu'il existe un morphisme ψ : N ′
ζ
tel que p2 ◦ ϕ = ψ ◦ p1.
∗ −→ N ′′
ζ
∗. Alors il existe un morphisme ϕ : Q∗
ζ −→ Q∗
ζ
D´emonstration. De la suite exacte suivante
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ) −→ Q∗
ζ
p2−→ N
′′
ζ
∗ −→ 0,
on obtient la suite exacte suivante de groupes cohomologiques
0 −→ Hom(Q∗
ζ, OP2n+1(−γ)) −→ Hom(Q∗
ζ, Q∗
ζ)
p2 ◦ •
−→ Hom(Q∗
ζ, N
′′
ζ
∗)
Comme on a
alors on obtient que
−→ Ext1(Q∗
ζ, OP2n+1(−γ)) −→ 0.
Ext1(Q∗
ζ, OP2n+1(−γ)) = H 1(Qζ(−γ)) = 0,
Hom(Q∗
ζ, Q∗
ζ)
p2 ◦ •
−→ Hom(Q∗
ζ, N
′′
ζ
∗) −→ 0.
28
MOHAMED BAHTITI
Comme on a le morphisme ψ ◦ p1 : Q∗
morphisme ϕ : Q∗
ζ −→ Q∗
ζ tel que p2 ◦ ϕ = ψ ◦ p1.
ζ −→ N ′′
ζ
∗ qui est dans Hom(Q∗
ζ, N ′′
ζ
∗), donc il existe un
(cid:3)
5.7. Lemme. Soit Qζ un fibr´e de quotient pond´er´e sur P2n+1. Soient f, f
dans Hom(OP2n+1(−γ), Q∗
seulement s'il existe un isomorphisme g ∈ End(OP2n+1(−γ)) tel que f = f
ζ). Alors f et f
′ donnent le meme ´el´ement dans QuotQ∗
′ deux morphismes
ζ /P2n+1 si et
′ ◦ g.
D´emonstration. C'est la d´efinition de sch´ema QuotQ∗
ζ /P2n+1.
(cid:3)
Le th´eor`eme suivant est une g´en´eralisation du ([2], th´eor`eme 4.4) sur P2n+1.
5.8. Th´eor`eme. Soient Qζ
0-corr´elation pond´er´e sur P2n+1 qui sont d´efinis par les suites exactes
le fibr´e de quotient pond´er´e sur P2n+1 et Nζ ,0 le fibr´e de
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ)
g0−→ Q∗
ζ −→ N ∗
ζ ,0 −→ 0
et
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ − ζ) −→ Hζ −→ Qζ −→ 0,
o`u g0 ∈ Hom(OP2n+1(−γ), Q∗
ζ). Alors chaque d´eformation miniversale de fibr´e Nζ ,0 est encore
un fibr´e de 0-corr´elation pond´er´e sur P2n+1. L'espace de Kuranishi de Nζ ,0 est lisse au point
correspondant de Nζ ,0.
ζ ,0 = coker(g0) un fibr´e vectoriel
ζ /P2n+1 un composant irr´eductible de
ζ /P2n+1 tel que g0 ∈ Y . Soient x ∈ Kur(Qζ) correspondant au fibr´e Qζ et z0 ∈ Kur(Nζ ,0)
D´emonstration. Soient g0 ∈ Hom(OP2n+1(−γ), Q∗
quotient de Q∗
QuotQ∗
correspondant au fibr´e Nζ ,0.
ζ correspondant au g0. Soit Y ⊆ QuotQ∗
ζ) et N ∗
(Y, g0)
Ψ
(KurQζ, x)
Φ
(KurNζ ,0, z0)
D'apr`es le th´eor`eme 5.5, pour le morphisme Ψ, on a
dimg0(Y ) = dimx(Kur(Qζ)) + dimg0(Ψ−1(x)),
et dimx(Kur(Qζ)) = h1(E nd(Qζ)). La dimension de la fibre du morphisme Ψ est ´egale `a
h0(Q∗
ζ (γ)) − h0(OP2n+1), donc on obtient
dimg0(Y ) = h1(E nd(Qζ)) + h0(Q∗
ζ(γ)) − 1.
En faisant la meme chose comme dans le th´eor`eme 5.5 on obtient, pour le morphisme Φ,
h1(E nd(Nζ ,0)) ≥ dimz0(Kur(Nζ ,0)) ≥ dimg0(Y ) − dimg0(Φ−1(z0)).
/
/
FIBR ´E VECTORIEL DE 0-CORR ´ELATION POND ´ER ´E SUR L'ESPACE P2n+1
29
Soit Z = {g1 ∈ Y N ∗
ζ ,1 ≃ N ∗
ζ ,0 o`u N ∗
ζ ,1 est le fibr´e correspondant `a g1 }. On obtient que
(Φ−1(z0), g0) ⊆ (Z, g0) et dimg0((Φ−1(z0), g0)) ≤ dimg0((Z, g0)).
Donc on a
dimz0(Kur(Nζ ,0)) ≥ dimg0(Y ) − dimg0((Z, g0)).
Soit Σ = {σ ∈ End(Qζ) σ.g0 = g0}. D'apr`es les lemmes 5.6 et 5.7, on obtient alors que
dimg0(Z) = h0(E nd(Qζ)) − dimg0(Σ) − 1.
En consid´erant la suite exacte suivante de fibr´es vectoriels
0 −→ Q∗
ζ ⊗ Nζ ,0 −→ E nd(Qζ) −→ Q∗
ζ(γ) −→ 0,
on obtient la suite exacte suivante de groupes cohomologiques
0 −→ H 0(Q∗
ζ ⊗ Nζ ,0) −→ End(Qζ)
•◦g0−→ H 0(Q∗
ζ(γ)),
qui nous donne dimg0(Σ) = h0(Q∗
ζ ⊗ Nζ ,0). Donc on obtient que
dimz0(Kur(Nζ ,0)) ≥ h1(E nd(Qζ)) + h0(Q∗
ζ(γ)) − h0(E nd(Qζ)) + h0(Q∗
ζ ⊗ Nζ ,0).
De la suite exacte pr´ec´edente de fibr´es vectoriels, on obtient que
dimz0(Kur(Nζ ,0)) ≥ h1(E nd(Qζ)) + h0(Q∗
= h1(Q∗
ζ ⊗ Nζ ,0) − h2(Q∗
ζ ⊗ Nζ ,0) + h1(Q∗
ζ(γ)) − h0(E nd(Qζ)) + h0(Q∗
ζ(γ)) + h2(E nd(Qζ)).
ζ ⊗ Nζ ,0) =
et
. . . −→ H 1(Q∗
ζ(γ)) −→ H 2(Q∗
ζ ⊗ Nζ ,0) −→ H 2(E nd(Qζ)) −→ . . .
Donc on obtient que h2(Q∗
ζ ⊗ Nζ ,0) ≤ h2(E nd(Qζ)) + h1(Q∗
ζ(γ)) et que
dimz0(Kur(Nζ ,0)) ≥ h1(Q∗
ζ ⊗ Nζ ,0).
En consid´erant la suite exacte suivante de fibr´es vectoriels
0 −→ Nζ ,0(−γ) −→ Q∗
ζ ⊗ Nζ ,0 −→ E nd(Nζ ,0) −→ 0,
on obtient que
. . . −→ H 1(Q∗
ζ ⊗ Nζ ,0) −→ H 1(E nd(Nζ ,0)) −→ H 2(Nζ ,0(−γ)) −→ . . .
Donc on a
et
h1(E nd(Nζ ,0)) ≤ h1(Q∗
ζ ⊗ Nζ ,0) + h2(Nζ ,0(−γ)) = h1(Q∗
ζ ⊗ Nζ ,0)
dimz0(Kur(Nζ ,0)) ≥ h1(E nd(Nζ ,0)).
Alors on a dimz0(Kur(Nζ ,0)) = h1(E nd(Nζ ,0)) et Kur(Nζ ,0) est lisse en z0. De plus on a
dimz0(Kur(Nζ ,0)) = dimg0(Y ) − dimg0(Φ−1(z0)).
D'apr`es le th´eor`eme de la semicontinuit´e de fibres (12.8, page 288 [14]), on obtient que
dimz0(Im(Φ)) = dimz0(Kur(Nζ ,0)) et que Φ est surjectif. Cela implique que Nζ ,0 est invariant
par rapport `a une d´eformation miniversale.
(cid:3)
30
MOHAMED BAHTITI
′ deux fibr´es vectoriels simples non-
5.9. Th´eor`eme. ([19], th´eor`eme 6.4). Soient E et E
′ sont non-s´eparables (topologique-
isomorphiques sur Pm. Si les points associ´es aux fibr´es E et E
ment) dans l'espace du module de fibr´es simples, alors il existe deux morphismes non-triviaux
ϕ : E −→ E
′
′
, ψ : E
−→ E
tels que ϕ ◦ ψ = ψ ◦ ϕ = 0.
D´emonstration. voir [19].
(cid:3)
5.10. Proposition. ([23], Lemme 1.2.8). Soient E et E
que rg(E
Si au moins un des deux fibr´es est stable, alors ϕ est un isomorphisme.
′) = c1(E) sur Pm. Soit ϕ : E −→ E
′) = rg(E) et c1(E
′ deux fibr´es vectoriels semi-stables tels
′ un morphisme non-trivial.
D´emonstration. voir [23].
(cid:3)
ζ des fibr´es de quotient pond´er´e sur P2n+1 et Nζ, N ′
5.11. Proposition. Soient Qζ, Q′
de 0-corr´elation pond´er´e sur P2n+1 qui sont d´efinis par les suites exactes, pour ζ = 0,
ζ des fibr´es
et
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ) −→ Hζ −→ Qζ −→ 0
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ) −→ Hζ −→ Q
ζ −→ 0,
′
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ) −→ Q∗
ζ
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ) −→ Q
ζ
′
∗
q−→ Nζ −→ 0
q′−→ N
ζ −→ 0.
′
Soit γ > (2n + 1)λn. Alors les points associ´es aux Nζ, N ′
module MP2n+1.
ζ sont s´eparables dans l'espace du
D´emonstration. On fixe γ > (2n + 1)λn ≥ Pn
i=0 λi. Supposons que les points associ´es aux
ζ sont non-s´eparables dans l'espace de module MP2n+1. D'apr`es la proposition 5.9, il
Nζ, N ′
existe deux morphismes non-triviaux
ϕ : Nζ −→ N
′
ζ , ψ : N
′
ζ −→ Nζ
tels que ϕ ◦ ψ = ψ ◦ ϕ = 0. En utilisant la suite exacte suivante
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ) −→ Q
ζ
′
∗
q′−→ N
′
ζ −→ 0,
on obtient la suite exacte suivante de groupes cohomologiques
0 −→ Hom(Q∗
ζ, OP2n+1(−γ)) −→ Hom(Q∗
−→ Ext1(Q∗
ζ, Q
ζ
ζ, OP2n+1(−γ)).
′
∗) −→ Hom(Q∗
ζ, N
′
ζ )
Comme on a
alors on obtient
Ext1(Q∗
ζ, OP2n+1(−γ)) = H 1(Qζ(−γ)) = 0,
Hom(Q∗
′
ζ, Q
ζ
∗) −→ Hom(Q∗
ζ, N
′
ζ ) −→ 0.
FIBR ´E VECTORIEL DE 0-CORR ´ELATION POND ´ER ´E SUR L'ESPACE P2n+1
31
Donc, pour le morphisme
ϕ ◦ q : Q∗
ζ
q−→ Nζ
ϕ−→ N
′
ζ
il existe 0 6= ρ ∈ Hom(Q∗
ζ sont
stables. D'apr`es la proposition 5.10, on obtient que le morphisme ρ est un isomorphisme. Donc
on a le diagramme commutatif
′ ◦ ρ = ϕ ◦ q. D'apr`es la proposition 3.3 Q′
ζ
∗) tel que q
ζ, Q′
ζ
∗, Q∗
Q∗
ζ
ρ ≀
∗
Q′
ζ
q
′
q
Nζ
ϕ
/ N ′
ζ
0
/ 0
En r´ep´etant les memes proc´edures pr´ec´edentes pour le morphisme ψ : N ′
utilisant la suite exacte
ζ −→ Nζ, tout en
0 −→ OP2n+1(−γ) −→ Q∗
ζ
q
−→ Nζ −→ 0,
on obtient alors un isomorphisme 0 6= ρ
′ ∈ Hom(Q∗
ζ
′
, Q∗
ζ) tel que le carr´e suivant est commutatif
∗
Q′
ζ
′
ρ
≀
Q∗
ζ
′
q
N ′
ζ
ψ
0
/ Nζ
q
/ 0.
Donc on a le diagramme suivant
0
0
0
/ OP2n+1(−γ)
/ OP2n+1(−γ)
/ OP2n+1(−γ)
/ Q∗
ζ
ρ ≀
/ Q′∗
ζ
′
ρ
≀
/ Q∗
ζ
q
′
q
q
0
0
Nζ
ϕ
N ′
ζ
ψ
/ Nζ
/ 0
tel que q ◦ ρ
x ∈ P2n+1, par
′ ◦ ρ = ψ ◦ ϕ ◦ q = 0. Donc on a le morphisme suivant qui est d´efini, pour tout
gx : Qζ
∗
x −→ (OP2n+1(−γ))x −→ 0
z 7−→ ρ
◦ ρ(z).
′
Alors on a le morphisme 0 −→ OP2n+1
Qζ(−γ). Ce qui est une contradiction au fait que H 0(Qζ(−γ)) = 0.
g∗
−→ Qζ(−γ), c'est-`a-dire on a une section de fibr´e
(cid:3)
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
32
MOHAMED BAHTITI
R´ef´erences
[1] Ancona, V. Ottaviani, G. Stability of special instanton bundles on P2n+1. Trans. of the Amer. Math.
Soc.341, 2 (1994), 677-693.
[2] Ancona, V. Ottaviani, G. 3- bundles on P5. (1993).
[3] Ancona, V. Ottaviani, G. On moduli of instanton bundles on P2n+1. Pacific J. of Math. 171, 2 (1995),
343-351.
[4] Atiyah, M.F. Geometry on YangMills fields, Scuola Normale Superiore Pisa, Pisa, 1979, 99 pp.
[5] Atiyah, M.F. R.S. Ward. Instantons and algebraic geometry, Comm. Math. Phys. 55 (1977), 117-124.
[6] Atiyah, M. Drinfeld, V. Hitchin, N. and Manin, Y. Construction of instantons, Phys. Lett., 65A(1978),
pp. 185-187.
[7] Bohnhorst, G. Spindler, H. The stability of certain vector bundles on Pn. Complex algebraic varieties
(Bayreuth, 1990), 39-50, Lect. Notes in Math. , 1507, Springer, Berlin, 1992.
[8] Brınzanescu, V. Holomorphic Vector Bundles over Compact Complex Surfaces. Lect. Notes in Math. 1624.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1996).
[9] Cascini, P. Weighted Tango bundles on Pn and their moduli spaces. Forum Math. 13(2001), 251-260.
[10] Dionisi, C. Symplectic Small Deformations of Special Instanton Bundle on P2n+1. Ann. di Mat. pura et
appl. 175 (1998), 285-293.
[11] Douady, A. Verdier, J.-L. editors. Les ´equations de Yang-Mills. S´eminaire E.N.S. 1977-1978, Ast´erisque
71-72. Paris: Soc. Math. France, 1980.
[12] Ein, L. generalized null correlation bundles. Nagoya Math. J.Vol. HI (1988), 13-24.
[13] Fulton, W. Intersection Theory. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1998).
[14] Hartshorne, R. Algebraic Geometry. Gradua.Texte in Math. 52. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1977).
[15] Hartshorne, R. Deformation theory. Gradua.Texte in Math. 257. Springer New York (2010).
[16] Husemoller, D. Fibre Bundles. Third edition. Grad. Texts in Math. 20. Springer-Verlag, New York (1994).
[17] Huybrecht, D. lehn, M. The geometry of moduli space of scheaves. Seco. edition. Cambr.Univ.Press. 2010.
[18] Jardim, M. Mir`o-Roig, R. M. On the semistability of instanton sheaves over certain projective varieties.
Comm. in Algebra 36 (2008), 288-298.
[19] Kosarew, S. Okonek, C. Global Moduli Spaces and Simple Holomorphic Bundles. Publ. RIMS, Kyoto
Univ.25 (1989), 1-19.
[20] Kuranishi, M. New proof for the existence of locally complete families of complex structures. Proceedings
of the Conference on Complex Analysis 1965, pp 142-154.
[21] Le Potier, J. Lectures on vector bundles. Cambridge Studies in Adv. Math. 54. Cambridge University Press
(1997).
[22] Migliore, C. Nagel, U. Peterson, C. Buchsbaum-Rim Sheaves and Their Multiple Sections. Journal of
Algebra 219, 378- 420. (1999).
[23] Okonek, C. Schneider, M. Spindler, H. Vector Bundles on Complex Projective Spaces With an Appendix by
S. I. Gelfand. Progress in Math. 3. Birkhauser (1980).
[24] Okonek, C. Spindler, H. Mathematical instanton bundles on P 2n+1, J. Reine Angew. Math., 364 (1986),
pp. 3550.
[25] Ottaviani, G. Trautmann, G. The tangent space at a special symplectic instanton bundle on P2n+1.
Manuscripta Math. 85, no. 1 (1994), 97-107.
[26] Qing, L. Algebraic Geometry and arithmetic curves. Oxford University Press, New York (2002).
[27] Salamon, S.M. Quaternionic structures and twistor spaces. In T.J. Willmore and N.J. Hitchin, editors,
Global Riemannian geometry (Durham 1982), pages 6574, 1984.
[28] Spindler, H. Trautmann, G. Special instanton bundles on P2n+1, their geometry and their moduli. Math.
Ann. 1990, Volume 286, Iss. 1-3, pp. 559-592.
Institut de Math´ematiques de Jussieu, Case 247, 4 place Jussieu,
F-75252 Paris, France
E-mail address: [email protected]
|
1309.6302 | 2 | 1309 | 2013-11-24T22:31:43 | Geography of irregular Gorenstein 3-folds | [
"math.AG"
] | In this paper, we study the explicit geography problem of irregular Gorenstein minimal 3-folds of general type. We generalize the classical Noether-Castelnuovo inequalities for irregular surfaces to irregular 3-folds according to the Albanese dimension. | math.AG | math |
GEOGRAPHY OF IRREGULAR GORENSTEIN
3-FOLDS
TONG ZHANG
Abstract. In this paper, we study the explicit geography prob-
lem of irregular Gorenstein minimal 3-folds of general type. We
generalize the classical Noether-Castelnuovo inequalities for irreg-
ular surfaces to irregular 3-folds according to the Albanese dimen-
sion.
Contents
Introduction
1.
2. Notations
3. Preliminaries
4. Linear series on algebraic surfaces
5. Relative Noether inequalities
6. Proof of Theorem 1.3
7. Proof of Theorem 1.5
8. Proof of Theorem 1.6
References
1
5
6
9
12
15
18
26
30
1. Introduction
We work over an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0.
A projective variety X is called irregular, if h1(OX ) > 0, i.e., X
has a nontrivial Albanese map. Denote by a(X) ⊆ Alb(X) the im-
age of X under its Albanese map. The Albanese dimension dim a(X)
can vary from one to dim X. We say X is of Albanese dimension m,
if dim a(X) = m.
In particular, we say X is of maximal Albanese
dimension, if dim a(X) = dim X.
The purpose of this paper is to study the geography problem of
irregular varieties.
Date: September 23, 2018.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 14J30.
Key words and phrases. 3-fold, geography, irregular variety.
1
2
TONG ZHANG
Let C be a projective curve of genus g > 0. One has
deg(ωC) = 2χ(ωC) ≥ 0.
The above result has several 2-dimensional generalizations. For an
irregular minimal surface S of general type (with ADE singularities),
χ(ωS) > 0. One has the Noether, Castelnuovo and Severi inequalities
for irregular surfaces proved respectively by Bombieri [6], Horikawa [21]
and Pardini [34]. Namely,
(1) Noether inequality: K 2
(2) Castelnuovo inequality: K 2
S ≥ 2χ(ωS) if S is irregular (see [6]);
S ≥ 3χ(ωS) if the Albanese fiber is
not hyperelliptic of genus 2 or 3 (see [21]);
(3) Severi inequality: K 2
S ≥ 4χ(ωS) if S is of maximal Albanese
dimension (See [35, 34]).
The above results concern the geography of irregular surfaces (of Al-
banese fiber dimension ≤ 1) and they have played a very important
role in the surface theory. Also, in the recent work of Lu [30, 31] and
Lopes-Pardini [29], results of such type have been applied to study the
hyperbolicity of irregular surfaces.
Having seen the importance of such results, as a natural question,
one can ask
Question 1.1. What are the Noether, Castelnuovo and Severi inequal-
ities for irregular Gorenstein 3-folds?
Here we assume the 3-folds being Gorenstein so that χ(ωX) > 0 and
we can have nontrivial inequalities
K 3
X ≥ aχ(ωX )
with a > 0 similar to the surface case.
In fact, several questions of the similar type have been raised before.
In early 1980's, Miles Reid asked the following question: what is the
Noether inequality for 3-folds? Also, as an open problem in [13, §3.9],
Chen conjectured that
Conjecture 1.2. For Gorenstein minimal 3-fold X of general type,
there should be a Noether inequality in the following form:
where a(> 1), b are both positive rational numbers.
K 3
X ≥ aχ(ωX) − b
As is mentioned in [13], any bound a > 1 is nontrivial and interest-
ing. However, it might be more difficult than the inequality between
K 3
X and pg(X). One possible problem comes from the difficulty to un-
derstand h1(OX ) and h2(OX). Another problem may be due to the
GEOGRAPHY OF IRREGULAR GORENSTEIN 3-FOLDS
3
non-smoothness. For example, when X is smooth and minimal, it is
X ≥ 2
proved in [7] that K 3
3(2pg(X) − 5). From this, Chen and Hacon
[14] have proved that a = 8
9. But if X is Gorenstein, it is still an open
question whether K 3
3(2pg(X) − 5) holds. See [7, Conjecture 4.4].
Recently, the Severi inequality has been proved by Barja [2] and by
the author [42] independently: Let X be an irregular minimal Goren-
stein 3-fold of general type. If X is of maximal Albanese dimension,
then
X ≥ 2
K 3
X ≥ 12χ(ωX).
Our first purpose of this paper is to give a complete answer to Ques-
tion 1.1 by proving the following Noether-Castelnuovo inequalities.
Theorem 1.3. Let X be an irregular minimal Gorenstein 3-fold of
general type. If X has Albanese fiber dimension one, then
K 3
X ≥ 4χ(ωX).
Moreover, if the Albanese fiber is not hyperelliptic of genus ≤ 5, then
K 3
X ≥ 6χ(ωX).
This theorem, combining with the Miyaoka-Yau inequality K 3
X ≤
72χ(ωX), will give the explicit geography of Gorenstein irregular 3-
folds of Albanese dimension ≥ 2.
Along this line, one can naturally consider the following much finer
conjecture of Noether-Castelnuovo type when X has Albanese dimen-
sion one:
Conjecture 1.4. Let X be an irregular minimal Gorenstein 3-fold of
general type with Albanese dimension one. Then
X ≥ 2χ(ωX).
If the Albanese fiber has large volume, then
K 3
K 3
X ≥ 3χ(ωX).
Here we consider the volume of the fiber instead of its geometric
genus simply because the volume is always positive for a surface of
general type, but the geometric genus is not.
One should note that the above conjecture is the most suitable gen-
eralization by comparing the coefficients before χ(ωX) to those in the
surface case or in Theorem 1.3.
By the sharp inequality K 3
3(2pg(X) − 5) [7] in the smooth
case, Conjecture 1.4 seems to be too optimistic. But surprisingly, the
following theorem shows that the above conjecture is at most only a
little away from being true.
X ≥ 2
4
TONG ZHANG
Theorem 1.5. Let X be an irregular minimal Gorenstein 3-fold of
general type with Albanese dimension one. Let f : X → Y be the
induced Albanese fibration with a smooth general fiber F . Then
unless one of the following holds:
K 3
X ≥ 2χ(ωX)
• pg(F ) = 2 and K 2
• pg(F ) = 3 and K 2
F = 1. In this case, K 3
F = 2. In this case, K 3
X ≥ 4
X ≥ 12
3χ(ωX).
7 χ(ωX).
If K 2
F ≥ 12, then
K 3
X ≥ 3χ(ωX).
Recall that in the surface case, we have K 2
S ≥ 3χ(ωS) if the Albanese
fiber is nonhyperelliptic. Here, we also study the irregular 3-folds whose
Albanese fiber has no hyperelliptic pencil. We have the following result.
Theorem 1.6. Notations as in Theorem 1.5. Suppose F has no hy-
perelliptic pencil. Then
provided that K 2
F ≥ 9.
K 3
X ≥ 3χ(ωX).
Remark 1.7. The geography of non-Gorenstein 3-folds of general type
is a very subtle topic. In particular, χ(ωX) can be zero or even neg-
ative. For example, there do exist examples of non-Gorenstein 3-folds
of maximal Albanese dimension with χ(ωX ) = 0 (see [15]).
In [11],
Chen and Hacon have constructed a family of non-Gorenstein 3-folds
of general type with χ(ωX) negative. In their paper, they obtained a
similar type of inequality
K 3
X ≥ cχ(ωX)
but c < 0. One can also construct families of non-Gorenstein 3-folds of
general type with Albanese dimension two and χ(ωX ) < 0 (see Example
6.3). In these cases, Theorem 1.3 holds trivially. We would like to point
out that in [9], Chen and Chen have proved that there exists an explicit
effective lower bound for Vol(X).
Let us sketch the proofs of the above theorems. If X has Albanese
dimension two, Pardini's method [34] on ´etale covering and limiting can
be applied here, provided one has a good slope inequality for fibered
3-folds over surfaces, which is not known yet. In this paper, to over-
come this difficulty, we prove the relative Noether inequalities such as
Theorem 5.2, 5.3, and 5.4 for fibered 3-folds over surfaces. These in-
equalities are about K 3
X and h0(KX) up to some explicit error terms.
Then by the generic vanishing theorem due to Green and Lazarsfeld
GEOGRAPHY OF IRREGULAR GORENSTEIN 3-FOLDS
5
[17], we know that χ(ωX) is bounded from above by h0(KX) up to ´etale
covering. Finally, by Pardini's limiting trick, we can prove Theorem
1.3.
If the Albanese dimension of X is one, we still have the ´etale covering
method by Bombieri and Horikawa [6, 20]. But the generic vanishing
does not help in this case. Alternatively, we will prove the following
relative Noether inequalities, Theorem 7.1 and 8.1, for fibered 3-folds
over curves. They will imply Theorem 1.5 and 1.6 via the above cover-
ing method if the volume of the Albanese fiber ≥ 4. Note that the slope
inequality for fibered 3-folds over curves has been studied by Ohno [33]
and Barja [1]. Finally, we will prove case by case when the volume of
the Albanese fiber ≤ 3.
This paper is organized as follows: In Section 3, we prove several
basic results for fibered 3-folds.
In Section 4, we list several results
about linear systems on algebraic surfaces. In Section 5, we prove the
relative Noether inequalities for fibered 3-folds over surfaces. In Section
6, we will prove Theorem 1.3. In Section 7 and 8, we consider the case
of Albanese dimension one and prove Theorem 1.5 and 1.6.
X ≥ 2
After finishing the paper, the author was told by Jungkai Chen that
in a very recent paper [8] joint with Meng Chen, they proved that
K 3
3(2h0(KX) − 5) still holds in the Gorenstein case. In another
very recent paper, Hu [23] showed that K 3
3χ(ωX) − 2 in this case.
Also, the author has been informed by Miguel Barja that in [2, Remark
4.6], the first inequality of Theorem 1.3 is also independently proved
by him using a different method.
X ≥ 4
Acknowledgement. The author is very grateful to Miguel Barja,
Jungkai Chen, Meng Chen, Xi Chen, Zhi Jiang and Xinyi Yuan for
their interests and valuable discussions related to this paper. He has
benefited a lot from several discussions with Steven Lu about and be-
yond this subject since December 2012. The author thanks Chenyang
Xu for his hospitality when the author visited BICMR. Special thanks
also goes to ECNU, NUS, USTC for their hospitality.
The work is supported by an NSERC Discovery Grant.
2. Notations
The following notations will be frequently used in this paper:
Let X be a projective variety and L be a line bundle on X such that
h0(L) ≥ 2. We denote by φL : X 99K Ph0(L)−1 the rational map induced
by the complete linear series L. We say that φL is generically finite, if
dim φL(X) = dim X. Otherwise, we say L is composed with a pencil.
6
TONG ZHANG
A Q-Weil divisor D on a variety X of dimension n is called pseudo-
effective, if for any nef line bundles A1, · · · , An−1 on X, we have
A1 · · · An−1D ≥ 0.
Such divisors can be characterized as the limit of effective divisors.
Let α : X → A be a morphism from X to an abelian variety A.
Denote by µd : A → A the multiplicative map of A by d. We have the
following diagram:
Xd
αd
A
φd
µd
X
α
/ A
Here Xd = X ×µd A is the fiber product. We call Xd the d-th lifting
of X by α. In particular, if α is the Albanese map of X, then we call
Xd the d-th Albanese lifting of X. This construction has been used by
Pardini in [34].
In this paper, a fibration f : X → Y always means a surjective
morphism with connected fibers.
3. Preliminaries
Let X be a projective n-fold. Here we assume that n = 2, 3. Let
f : X → Y be a fibration from X to a smooth projective curve Y with
a smooth general fiber F . Then for any nef line bundle L on X, we
can find a unique integer eL such that
• L − eLF is not nef;
• L − eF is nef for any integer e < eL.
We call this number the minimum of L with respect to F . In particular,
eL > 0. Another important fact is that, if h0(L − eLF ) > 0, then
L−eLF has horizontal base locus (c.f. [42, §2]). We have the following
theorem.
Theorem 3.1. With the above notations. Let L be a nef and effective
line bundle on X. Then we have the following quadruples
{(Xi, Li, Zi, ai),
i = 0, 1, · · · , N}
with the following properties:
(1) (X0, L0, Z0, a0) = (X, L, 0, eL).
(2) For any i = 0, · · · , N − 1, πi : Xi+1 → Xi is a composition of
blow-ups of Xi such that the proper transform of the movable
i Fi
part of Li − aiFi is base point free. Here F0 = F , Fi+1 = π∗
/
/
/
GEOGRAPHY OF IRREGULAR GORENSTEIN 3-FOLDS
7
and ai = eLi is the minimum of Li with respect to Fi. Moreover,
we have the decomposition
π∗
i (Li − aiFi) = Li+1 + Zi+1
such that Li+1 is base point free and Zi+1Fi+1 > 0.
(3) We have h0(L0) > h0(L1) > · · · > h0(LN ) > h0(LN − aN FN ) =
0. Here aN = eLN .
Proof. See [42, §2].
(cid:3)
Remark 3.2. From the above construction, we have
h0(L0F0) ≥ h0(L1F1) > h0(L2F2) > · · · > h0(LN FN ).
In general, we do not know if h0(L0F0) > h0(L1F1). But if L0F is
base point free, then
h0(L0F0) > h0(L1F1).
This fact will be used in the proofs of Theorem 7.1 and 8.1.
Write ρi = π0 ◦ · · · ◦ πi−1 : Xi → X0 for i = 1, · · · , N. Fix a nef line
bundle P = P0 on X and denote
L′
i = Li − aiFi,
ri = h0(LiFi),
di = (PiFi)(LiFi)n−1,
where Pi = ρ∗
i P . It is easy to see that we have
d0 ≥ d1 ≥ · · · ≥ dN ≥ 0.
Proposition 3.3. For any j = 0, · · · , N , we have the following nu-
merical inequalities:
j
(1) h0(L0) ≤ h0(L′
j) +
airi;
Xi=0
Xi=0
j
(2) P0L2
0 ≥ 2a0d0 +
ai(di−1 + di) − 2d0.
(n = 3)
Proof. In [42, §2], (1) is proved. We sketch it here. By the following
exact sequence
0 −→ H 0(Li − Fi) −→ H 0(Li) −→ H 0(LiFi),
we get
h0(Li − Fi) ≥ h0(Li) − h0(LiFi) = h0(Li) − ri.
By induction and summing over i = 0, · · · , j, we can get (1).
8
TONG ZHANG
For (2), since π∗
i L′
i = ai+1Fi+1 + L′
i+1 + Zi+1, we have the following
computation of 1-cycles:
(π∗
i L′
i)2 − L′2
i+1 = (π∗
i L′
= ai+1(π∗
= ai+1(π∗
+(L′
i L′
i + L′
i − L′
i L′
i L′
i+1)(π∗
i + L′
i + L′
i+1)
i + L′
i L′
i+1)Fi+1 + (π∗
i+1)Zi+1
i L′
i+1)Fi+1 + (π∗
i + Fi+1)Zi+1
i+1 + Fi+1)Zi+1 − 2(π∗
i − L′
i L′
i+1)Fi+1.
i+1+Fi+1 are both nef. Taking intersections
i+1 ≥ ai+1(di+di+1)−2(di−di−1).
i L′
i +Fi+1 and L′
Note that π∗
with Pi+1 for both sides, we can get
PiL2
Summing over i = 0, · · · , j − 1, we have
i Li)2−Pi+1L2
i+1 = Pi+1(π∗
i −Pi+1L2
P0L′2
0 − PjL′2
j ≥
j
Xi=1
ai(di−1 + di) − 2(d0 − dj).
Note that we also have
P0L2
0 − P0L′2
0 = 2a0d0,
PjL′2
j + 2dj ≥ 0.
Hence (2) follows.
(cid:3)
We can refine the first inequality of Proposition 3.3 as follows.
Proposition 3.4. Let H 0(L) → H 0(LF ) be the restriction map. De-
note by r the dimension of its image. Then for any j = 1, · · · , N , we
have
j
h0(L0) ≤ h0(L′
j) + a0r +
airi.
Xi=1
Proof. We know that r = h0(L) − h0(L − F ). Following the same
strategy of the proof of Proposition, one can see that in order to prove
the inequality here, we only need to show that
h0(L − iF ) − h0(L − (i + 1)F ) ≤ h0(L) − h0(L − F )
for any 0 ≤ i ≤ a0 − 1.
In fact, the result holds if a0 = 1. If a0 > 1, by the following exact
sequence
0 −→ H 0(L − 2F ) −→ H 0(L − F ) ⊕ H 0(L − F ) −→ H 0(L),
we know that
h0(L − F ) − h0(L − 2F ) ≤ h0(L) − h0(L − F ) = r.
Therefore, we can finish the proof by induction.
(cid:3)
GEOGRAPHY OF IRREGULAR GORENSTEIN 3-FOLDS
9
We also have the following lemma.
Lemma 3.5. Under the above setting, for n = 2, 3, we have
P0Ln−1
0 ≥ (n − 1)d0(a0 − 1) + d0
N
Xi=1
ai.
Proof. For i = 0, · · · , N − 1, denote by τi = πi ◦ · · · ◦ πN −1 : XN → Xi
the composition of blow-ups.
Write b = a1 + · · · + aN and Z = τ ∗
1 Z1 + · · · + τ ∗
N −1ZN −1 + ZN . We
have the following numerical equivalence on XN :
N + bFN + Z.
0 ∼num L′
τ ∗
0 L′
Since L′
0 + F0 and L′
N + FN are both nef, it follows that
P0(L′
N + FN + bFN + Z)
0 + F0)n−1 = PN (τ ∗
0 L′
≥ bPN (τ ∗
0 L′
≥ bd0.
0 + FN )n−2(L′
0 + FN )n−2FN
Combining with
P0Ln−1
the proof is finished.
0 − P0(L′
0 + F0)n−1 = (n − 1)(a0 − 1)d0,
(cid:3)
4. Linear series on algebraic surfaces
In this section, we recall some basic results about linear series on
algebraic surfaces. These results will be used to compare the number
ri and di. They will also serve as the first step of the induction process.
In this section, we always use the following assumptions:
(1) S is a smooth algebraic surface of general type with the smooth
minimal model σ : S → S ′;
(2) L ≥ M are two nef line bundles on S such that L ≤ KS.
We have the following Noether type results.
Theorem 4.1. Assume that φL is generically finite. Then
LM ≥ 2h0(M) − 4.
Proof. To prove this result, we can assume that h0(M) ≥ 2. If M is
not composed with a pencil, from a result in [36, Theorem 2], we know
that
LM ≥ M 2 ≥ 2h0(M) − 4.
If M is composed with a pencil, we can write
M ∼num rC + Z.
10
TONG ZHANG
Here C is a general member of the pencil, r ≥ h0(M) − 1 and Z is
the fixed part of M. Because φL is generically finite, h0(LC) ≥ 2. It
implies that LC ≥ 2 since S is of general type. We get
LM ≥ rLC ≥ 2h0(M) − 2.
Hence we prove the theorem.
(cid:3)
The above theorem is also used in [38].
Theorem 4.2. [33, Lemma 2.3] If L is not composed with a pencil
and h0(L) < pg(S), then
(σ∗KS ′)L ≥ 2h0(L) − 2.
If L is composed with a pencil, then
(σ∗KS ′)L ≥ 2h0(L) − 2,
except for the case when K 2
S ′ = 1, pg(S) = 2 and q(S) = 0.
We refer to [1] for more of the above type. We have a better Castel-
nuovo type bound under some extra conditions.
Theorem 4.3. Assume that S has no hyperelliptic pencil and that φL
is generically finite. Then
LM ≥ 3h0(M) − 7.
Proof. We can assume that h0(M) ≥ 3. If φM is generically finite, then
by the Castelnuovo type inequality (c.f. [4, Th´eor`eme 5.5]),
LM ≥ M 2 ≥ 3h0(M) − 7.
If not, we can still write M ∼num rC + Z as before. Note that C is not
hyperelliptic. Hence LC ≥ 3. It gives
LM ≥ rLC ≥ 3h0(M) − 3.
It ends the proof.
(cid:3)
Theorem 4.4. Assume that S has no hyperelliptic pencil. If L is
composed with a pencil, then
(σ∗KS ′)L ≥ 3h0(L) − 3,
except for the case when K 2
not composed with a pencil and h0(L) < pg(S), then
S ′ = 2, pg(S) = 2 and q(S) = 0. If L is
(σ∗KS ′)L ≥ 3h0(L) − 5.
GEOGRAPHY OF IRREGULAR GORENSTEIN 3-FOLDS
11
Proof. If L is composed with a pencil, we can write
L ∼num rC + Z
where Z ≥ 0 is the fixed part, C is a general member of the pencil and
r ≥ h0(L) − 1. Let C ′ = σ(C). Then pa(C ′) ≥ 3 by our assumption.
If KS ′C ′ ≥ 3, then
(σ∗KS ′)L ≥ rKS ′C ′ ≥ 3h0(L) − 3.
If KS ′C ′ ≤ 2, since C ′ is nef and C ′ ≤ KS, we get C ′2 ≤ 2. It implies
that KS ′C ′ = C ′2 = 2 as pa(C ′) ≥ 3. Note that K 2
S ′ ≥ KS ′C ′. By
the Hodge index theorem, we have K 2
S ′ = 2, KS ′ ∼lin C ′ and pg(S) =
pg(S ′) = 2. This is just the exceptional case.
When φL is generically finite, we can assume that h0(L) ≥ 3. Since
h0(L) < pg(S), by the Hodge index theorem and the Castelnuovo in-
equalities from both [4, Th´eor`eme 5.5] and Theorem 4.3, we have
((σ∗KS ′)L)2 ≥ L2K 2
S ′ ≥ (3h0(L) − 7)(3pg(S) − 7)
≥ 9(h0(L))2 − 33h0(L) + 28
> 9(h0(L))2 − 36h0(L) + 36
= (3h0(L) − 6)2.
(σ∗KS ′)L ≥ 3h0(L) − 5.
It implies that
It ends the proof.
(cid:3)
We also give the following numerical result when S has a free pencil.
Theorem 4.5. Suppose that S has a free hyperelliptic pencil of genus
g ≥ 6. Then
(σ∗KS ′)L ≥ 3h0(L) − (4g − 4).
Proof. Denote by C a general member of this pencil. Up to birational
transformation, we can assume that L is base point free. In particular,
LC ≤ 2g − 2 should be an even number.
If LC = 0, then L ∼num aC where a ≥ h0(L) − 1. Then
(σ∗KS ′)L = a(2g − 2) > 3h0(L) − 3.
If LC ≥ 6, by [41, Theorem 1.1], one has
L2 ≥
4LC
LC + 2
h0(L) − 2LC ≥ 3h0(L) − (4g − 4).
12
TONG ZHANG
If 2 ≤ LC ≤ 4, resume the notations in Theorem 3.1, Proposition
3.3 and Lemma 3.5. Denote L0 = L and P = σ∗KS ′. We have
h0(L0) ≤
N
Xi=0
airi,
P L0 ≥ (a0 − 1)d0 +
N
Xi=1
aidi.
Here di = 2g − 2 ≥ 10 for all i and ri ≤ h0(LC) ≤ 3 by the Clifford's
inequality. It follows that
di > 3ri.
Hence
P L0 ≥
N
Xi=0
aidi − d0 > 3
N
Xi=0
It finishes the proof.
airi − d0 ≥ 3h0(L0) − (2g − 2).
(cid:3)
5. Relative Noether inequalities
In this section, we will prove several relative Noether inequalities.
The relative Noether inequality in [42] studies linear series on fibered
varieties over curves, while the relative Noether inequalities in this
section are devoted to studying fibered varieties whose fibers are curves.
Assumption 5.1. Throughout this section, we assume that:
• X is a Gorenstein minimal projective 3-fold of general type;
• f : X → Y is a fibration of curves of genus g from X to a
normal projective surface Y ;
• L is a nef and big line bundle on Y such that L is base point
free. Write B = f ∗L.
• If pg(X) > 0, write
KX =
I0
Xi=1
Hi + V,
where each Hi is an irreducible and reduced horizontal divisor
(Hi and Hj might be the same) and V is the vertical part. Note
that we have I0 ≤ 2g − 2. Since BHi is big on Hi, we can find
an integer k > 0 such that (kB − KX)Hi is pseudo-effective for
each i. Also we can assume that kB − V is pseudo-effective by
increasing k.
GEOGRAPHY OF IRREGULAR GORENSTEIN 3-FOLDS
13
Theorem 5.2. Under Assumption 5.1. Then one has
h0(KX ) −
K 3
X
4
≤
3K 2
X B + 2KXB2
4
+ 2(2k + 1).
Proof. To prove this result, one can assume that h0(KX) > 0.
Choose two very general members in B and denote by σ : X0 → X
the blow-up of their intersection. Let F be its proper transform. Then
we get a fibration X0 → P1 with general fiber F . Denote L0 = σ∗KX,
P0 = σ∗(KX + B) and B0 = σ∗B.
Now, apply Theorem 3.1 to X0, L0, P0 and also use the notations in
Proposition 3.3. We can get
N
h0(L0) ≤
airi;
Xi=0
Xi=0
N
P0L2
0 ≥ 2
aidi − 2d0.
To compare ri and di, note that P0F = KF . By Theorem 4.2, we know
that
By Lemma 3.5, we have
ri ≤
1
2
di + 2.
N
Xi=0
ai ≤
P0L2
0
d0
− a0 + 2 ≤
P0L2
0
d0
+ 1.
Combine the above inequalities and we get
h0(L0) −
P0L2
0
4
≤ 2
N
Xi=0
ai +
d0
2
≤
2P0L2
0
d0
+ 2 +
d0
2
.
On the other hand, note that kB − V and (kB − KX )Hi are pseudo-
effective. We can get
(KX + B)KXV ≤ k(KX + B)KXB,
I0
Xi=1
(KX + B)KXHi ≤ k
I0
Xi=1
As a result, we have
(KX + B)BHi ≤ k(KX + B)KX B.
P0L2
0
d0
=
=
K 2
X(KX + B)
(KX + B)KXB
(KX + B)KX V
(KX + B)KXB
+
I0
Xi=1
(KX + B)KX Hi
(KX + B)KX B
≤ 2k.
14
TONG ZHANG
Therefore,
h0(KX) ≤
=
=
P0L2
0
2P0L2
0
+
4
K 3
X + K 2
d0
XB
+
d0
2
+ 2
+ 4k +
K 2
X B + KXB2
2
+ 2
3K 2
XB + 2KXB2
4
+ 2(2k + 1).
4
+
K 3
X
4
It finishes the proof.
(cid:3)
Theorem 5.3. Still under Assumption 5.1. Suppose that X has no
hyperelliptic pencil. Then one has
h0(KX ) −
K 3
X
6
≤
3K 2
X B + 2KXB2
6
+
7
3
(2k + 1).
Proof. It is very similar to the previous proof. We sketch it here. Under
the same setting as in the proof of Theorem 5.2, we still have
N
h0(L0) ≤
airi;
Xi=0
Xi=0
N
P0L2
0 ≥ 2
aidi − 2d0.
Here, since F has no hyperelliptic pencil, by Theorem 4.4, we have
ri ≤
1
3
di +
7
3
.
Combine with Lemma 3.5. It gives
h0(L0) −
P0L2
0
6
≤
7
3
N
Xi=0
ai +
d0
3
≤
7P0L2
0
3d0
+
7
3
+
d0
3
.
Hence
h0(KX ) ≤
≤
=
P0L2
0
+
6
K 3
X + K 2
7P0L2
0
3d0
XB
+
+
7
3
+
d0
3
7
3
(2k + 1) +
K 2
XB + KX B2
3
3K 2
XB + 2KXB2
6
+
7
3
(2k + 1).
6
+
K 3
X
6
It finishes the proof.
(cid:3)
GEOGRAPHY OF IRREGULAR GORENSTEIN 3-FOLDS
15
Theorem 5.4. Still under Assumption 5.1. Suppose that f is hyperel-
liptic and g ≥ 6. Then
h0(KX) −
K 3
X
6
≤
3K 2
XB + 2KXB2
6
+
4g − 4
3
(2k + 1).
Proof. Here we simply follow the proof of Theorem 8.1. The only dif-
ference is that in this case, F has a free of genus g induced by f . By
Theorem 4.5, we have
ri ≤
1
3
di +
4g − 4
3
.
Follow the proof of Theorem 8.1 almost verbatim. We can get
h0(KX) ≤
K 3
X + K 2
X B
+
4g − 4
3
(2k + 1) +
K 2
XB + KXB2
3
6
+
=
K 3
X
6
3K 2
XB + 2KXB2
6
+
4g − 4
3
(2k + 1).
We leave the detailed proof to the interested readers.
(cid:3)
6. Proof of Theorem 1.3
In this section, we will prove Theorem 1.3. Note that the strategy
here has been used by Pardini [34] in the proof of Severi inequality for
surfaces.
We first state a theorem that has been used in [42].
Theorem 6.1. Let X be a projective, minimal, normal and irregular
variety. Denote by a(X) its Albanese image. For each d ∈ N, let Xd be
the d-th Albanese lifting of X. Then for each i = 0, · · · , dim a(X) − 1,
we have
lim
d→∞
hi(OXd)
d2m = 0.
Here m = h1(OX).
Proof. Since the Albanese lifting is ´etale, Xd is also minimal. Further-
more, Xd has only terminal singularities, which are rational. Hence it
suffices to assume that X is smooth. In this case, the result is just [42,
Theorem 4.1]. Also see [19, Remark 1.4] for the generic vanishing the-
orem for singular varieties with rational singularities in characteristic
0.
(cid:3)
Go back to the 3-fold case. Now assume that X has Albanese di-
mension two. Let Xd be the d-th Albanese lifting of X. We have the
16
TONG ZHANG
following diagram:
φd
µd
Xd
αd
A
X
α=AlbX
/ A
Let m = h1(OX). We have
h0(KXd) ≥ χ(ωXd) + h2(OXd) − h1(OXd) + 1
≥ d2mχ(ωX) − h1(OXd).
By Theorem 6.1, it follows that
h0(KXd) ≥ d2mχ(ωX) + o(d2m).
Note that in order to prove Theorem 1.3, we can assume that χ(ωX) >
0. Thus one can find an integer d > 0 such that h0(KXd) > 0. Also note
that Theorem 1.3 is true up to ´etale covers. Without loss of generality,
let us assume that h0(KX) > 0.
g0−→ Y h0−→ A (resp. Xd
hd−→ A) be the Stein factorization
of α (resp. αd). Let H be a sufficiently ample line bundle on A and
dLd for all d. Then we have [5,
Ld = h∗
Chapter 2, Proposition 3.5]
dH for all d. Write Bd = g ∗
gd−→ Yd
Let X
d2Bd ∼num φ∗
dB0.
Resume the notations in previous section. We can write
KXd = φ∗
dKX =
I0
Xi=1
dHi + φ∗
φ∗
dV.
By pulling back from X to Xd, one can check that
(kg ∗
dB0 − KXd)φ∗
dHi,
kφ∗
dB0 − φ∗
dV
are both pseudo-effective. Apply the above numerical equivalence and
we get
(kd2Bd − KXd)φ∗
dHi,
kd2Bd − φ∗
dV
are both pseudo-effective. Now by Theorem 5.2,
h0(KXd) ≤
=
K 3
Xd
4
+
d2mK 2
X
4
3K 2
XdBd + 2KXdB2
d
4
+ 2(2kd2 + 1)
+
3d2m−2K 2
X B0 + 2d2m−4KXB2
0
4
+ 2(2kd2 + 1).
Let d → ∞. We can prove that K 3
X ≥ 4χ(ωX).
/
/
/
GEOGRAPHY OF IRREGULAR GORENSTEIN 3-FOLDS
17
When the Albanese fiber is hyperelliptic of genus g ≥ 6, using the
same approach as above and by Theorem 5.4, we can prove
h0(KXd) ≤
d2mK 2
X
6
+
3d2m−2K 2
X B0 + 2d2m−4KXB2
0
6
+
4g − 4
3
(2kd2 + 1).
Let d → ∞ and we will have K 3
X ≥ 6χ(ωX).
Now we consider the case when the Albanese fiber is not hyperel-
liptic. Note that Ld is base point free on Yd. Hence by the above
numerical equivalence, we have
d2m−4L2
0 = L2
d ≥ h0(Ld) − 2 = h0(Bd) − 2,
i.e., h0(Bd) ∼ O(d2m−4). Therefore, up to ´etale covers, we can assume
that h0(KX) > h0(B0).
In particular, it implies that the Albanese
fibration factors through the canonical map of X.
We claim that X can not have hyperelliptic pencils. Otherwise, sup-
pose there is a hyperelliptic pencil on X. We would have the following
two possibilities: either this pencil is contracted by φKX or not. If it is
contracted by φKX , it would also be contracted by the Albanese map,
which is impossible since the Albanese pencil is nonhyperelliptic. The
second case is still impossible because if this pencil is not contracted
by φKX , then its image under φKX is a P1 pencil. Since the Albanese
image of X can not have any P1 pencil, by the factorization of the
Albanese map, this pencil has to be contracted by the Albanese map.
It contradicts with our assumption again.
Similar to the above claim, we can prove that Xd has no hyperelliptic
pencil. Thus by Theorem 5.3, we have
h0(KXd) ≤
d2mK 2
X
6
+
3d2m−2K 2
XB0 + 2d2m−4KXB2
0
6
+
7
3
(2kd2 + 1).
Similar as before, we can get K 3
X ≥ 6χ(ωX) by letting d → ∞.
Remark 6.2. In fact, if X is Q-Gorenstein, the same approach still
works. The only difference is that in this case KX is a Q-linear combina-
tion of prime divisors. This does not affect the whole proof. However,
if X is Q-Gorenstein but not Gorenstein, χ(ωX) might be negative.
Example 6.3. Fix an elliptic curve E. Take two curves Ci (i = 1, 2)
with genus gi ≥ 2 and involutions τi such that C1/hτ1i = E and
C2/hτ2i = P1. Let the 3-fold X be the quotient of C1 × C1 × C2 by
the diagonal involution. Hence X is Q-Gorenstein but not Gorenstein.
Let α : X → E × E × P1 be the induced cover. Then
α∗OX = OE ⊠ OE ⊠ OP1 ⊕ L1 ⊠ L1 ⊠ OP1 ⊕
OE ⊠ L1 ⊠ L2 ⊕ L1 ⊠ OE ⊠ L2
18
TONG ZHANG
where L1 and L2 are determined by the branch locus of C1 → E and
C2 → P1. It is easy to see that χ(OX ) > 0. Hence χ(ωX) < 0. It is
also easy to see that X has Albanese dimension two.
7. Proof of Theorem 1.5
In this section, we will prove Theorem 1.5. We have the following
relative Noether inequality for fibered 3-folds.
Theorem 7.1. Let X be a Gorenstein minimal 3-fold of general type,
Y a smooth curve and f : X → Y is a fibration with a smooth general
fiber F . Then
h0(ωX/Y ) ≤ (cid:18)1
4
+
1
K 2
F (cid:19) ω3
X/Y +
K 2
F + 4
2
except for the case when K 2
F = 1, pg(F ) = 2 and q(F ) = 0.
Proof. We know in this case, ωX/Y is nef. Resume the notations in
Theorem 3.1 and Proposition 3.3. Denote L0 = P = ωX/Y . It follows
that
h0(L0) ≤
N
Xi=0
airi;
L3
0 ≥ 2aidi +
N
Xi=1
ai(di−1 + di) − 2d0.
Hence
h0(L0) −
L3
0
4
≤
d0
2
+(cid:18)r0 −
1
2
d0(cid:19) a0 +
N
Xi=1
(cid:18)ri −
1
2
di −
di−1 − di
4
(cid:19) ai.
By Theorem 4.1, 4.2 and Remark 3.2, we can always get
r0 ≤
1
2
d0 + 2,
ri ≤
1
2
di +
di−1 − di
4
+ 1 (i > 0)
except when r0 = r1 and d1 ≤ 2r1 − 3.
If we are not in the exceptional case, then
By Lemma 3.5,
h0(L0) −
L3
0
4
≤
d0
2
+ 2a0 +
N
Xi=1
ai.
2a0 +
N
Xi=1
ai ≤
L3
0
d0
+ 2 ≤
L3
0
d0
+ 2.
GEOGRAPHY OF IRREGULAR GORENSTEIN 3-FOLDS
19
Hence
h0(L0) ≤ (cid:18)1
4
+
1
d0(cid:19) L3
0 +
d0 + 4
2
.
Finally, let us consider the exceptional case. Recall that we have
r0 = r1 and d1 ≤ 2r1 − 3. By Theorem 4.2, L1F1 defines a generically
finite morphism. Thus from Theorem 4.1, we know that
(L1F1)2 ≥ 2r1 − 4.
Note that π∗
0KF > L1F1. By the Hodge index theorem,
(2r1 − 3)2 ≥ d2
1 = ((π∗
0KF )(L1F1))2 > (L1F1)2K 2
F ,
which implies that K 2
point free, thus K 2
(L1F1)2 = 2r1 − 4. Therefore, we have two possibilities:
F ≤ 2r0 − 2. On the other hand, KF is not base
F ≥ 2r0 − 3. It also implies that d1 = 2r1 − 3 and
F = d1;
F = d1 + 1.
(1) d1 = 2r1 − 3 and K 2
(2) d1 = 2r1 − 3 and K 2
In Case (1), choose a blow up π : X ′ → X such that the movable
part M of π∗ωX/Y is base point free. Write F ′ = π∗F . Abusing the
notation, we denote the new L0 = M and P = π∗ωX/Y . Then we will
have a new sequence of ri's and di's. Under this new setting, ri−1 > ri
for each i > 0. Running the same process as before, we can get
h0(ωX/Y ) = h0(M) ≤ (cid:18)1
4
+
1
dM(cid:19) ω3
X/Y +
dM + 4
2
,
where dM = (π∗KF )(MF ′). We need to show that dM = K 2
F . In fact,
dM = KF (π(M)F ) ≤ K 2
F . On the other hand, since L1 comes from
the movable part of ωX/Y − a0F , it implies that π0(L1) ≤ π(M). In
particular, it means that
K 2
F = d1 = KF (π0(L1)F ) ≤ KF (π(M)F ) = dM .
Hence dM = K 2
F .
We claim that Case (2) does not occur. Write
KF = V + Z,
where V is the movable part of KF and Z ≥ 0. Since r1 = r0, we see
that π0(L1)F = V and so d1 = KF V . Since K 2
F > d1, it means that
KF Z > 0 and Z > 0. By the 2-connectedness of the canonical divisor,
we have V Z ≥ 2. Note that V 2 ≥ 2r0 − 4. It implies that
2r0 − 2 = K 2
F = V 2 + V Z + KF Z ≥ 2r0 − 2 + KF Z,
F > d1.
F . It contradicts with K 2
i.e., KF Z = 0 and KF V = K 2
(cid:3)
20
TONG ZHANG
Remark 7.2. Recall in [41] that if f : S → C is a relative minimal
fibered surface of genus g ≥ 2. One has
h0(ωS/C) ≤
g
4g − 4
ω2
S/C + g = (cid:18) 1
4
+
1
2 deg ωF(cid:19) ω2
S/C +
deg ωF + 2
2
.
Theorem 7.1 is a natural generalization of the above result. Moreover,
based on several results about linear series on surfaces in positive char-
acteristic (c.f. [26, 27]), our method can be also used study the fibered
3-folds in positive characteristic.
It is also interesting to compare Theorem 7.1 with the slope inequali-
ties proved by Ohno [33] and Barja [1] for fibered 3-folds over curves. In
their papers, Xiao's method on the Harder-Narasimhan filtration [39]
plays a very important role and it works only in characteristic zero.
By the same technique, we can also show the following Noether type
inequality for fibered 3-folds over curves in order for independent in-
terests.
Theorem 7.3. Let X be a Gorenstein and minimal fibered 3-fold of
general type fibered over a smooth curve Y with a smooth general fiber
F . Then
pg(X) ≤ (cid:18)1
4
+
1
K 2
F (cid:19) K 3
X +
K 2
F + 4
2
except for the case when K 2
F = 1, pg(F ) = 2 and q(F ) = 0.
Proof. We only need to replace ωX/Y in the proof of Theorem 7.1 by
KX.
(cid:3)
From now on, we assume that f : X → Y is the induced fibration
by the Albanese map from X to a projective curve Y with a smooth
general fiber F . One has g(Y ) = h1(OX ). We put the following remark
before the proof.
Remark 7.4. Suppose we can prove that
K 3
X ≥ aF χ(ωX) + bF ,
where aF and bF only depend on the numerical invariants of F . Then
we can get
K 3
X ≥ aF χ(ωX ).
This philosophy has been applied by Bombieri and Horikawa in [6, 20]
and also [41]. In fact, since g(Y ) = h1(OX ) > 0. Using the degree d
´etale base change π : Y ′ → Y , we can get a new fibration f ′ : X ′ → Y ′,
where X ′ = X ×Y Y ′. We still have
K 3
X ′ ≥ aF χ(ωX ′) + bF .
GEOGRAPHY OF IRREGULAR GORENSTEIN 3-FOLDS
21
Note that
K 3
X ′ = dK 3
X, χ(ωX ′) = dχ(ωX).
The conclusion will follow after we let d → ∞. This remark will also
be used in the next section.
Proposition 7.5. If pg(F ) = 0, then
K 3
X ≥ 6χ(ωX).
Proof. In this situation, pg(X) = 0. From the nefness of ωX/Y , we get
ω3
X/Y ≥ 0. Since ωX/Y = KX − (2g(Y ) − 2)F , we get
K 3
X ≥ 6(g(Y ) − 1)K 2
F ≥ 6(g(Y ) − 1) ≥ 6χ(ωX).
It finishes the proof.
(cid:3)
Proposition 7.6. If pg(F ) > 0 and (pg(F ), K 2
F ) 6= (2, 1), then
χ(ωX ) ≤ (cid:18) 1
4
+
Proof. From Theorem 7.1, we get
1
K 2
F(cid:19) K 3
X.
h0(ωX/Y ) ≤ (cid:18)1
= (cid:18)1
4
4
+
+
1
K 2
1
K 2
F (cid:19) (K 3
F (cid:19) K 3
X − 6K 2
X − 6(cid:18)K 2
F
4
+ 1(cid:19) (g(Y ) − 1) +
K 2
F + 4
2
.
F (g(Y ) − 1)) +
K 2
F + 4
2
On the other hand, by [24, 25], f∗ωX/Y and R1f∗ωX/Y are both semi-
positive. Following from [33, Lemma 2.4, 2.5], we have
h0(ωX/Y ) ≥ deg f∗ωX/Y − pg(F )(g(Y ) − 1)
≥ deg f∗ωX/Y − deg R1f∗ωX/Y − pg(F )(g(Y ) − 1)
= χ(ωX ) − (χ(OF ) + pg(F ))(g(Y ) − 1).
By applying Remark 7.4, to prove the conclusion, it suffices to prove
that
6(cid:18)K 2
F
4
+ 1(cid:19) ≥ χ(OF ) + pg(F ).
It is easy to see that this inequality follows from the classical Noether
inequality, since
6(cid:18)K 2
F
4
+ 1(cid:19) > K 2
F + 6 ≥ 2pg(F ) + 2 > χ(OF ) + pg(F ).
It finishes the proof.
(cid:3)
From the above proposition, we see that Theorem 1.5 holds if K 2
F ≥
4. In the following, we will consider the case when K 2
F ≤ 3.
22
TONG ZHANG
Proposition 7.7. We have
K 3
X ≥ 2χ(ωX)
in the following two cases:
(1) pg(F ) = 2, K 2
(2) pg(F ) = 3, K 2
F = 2, 3;
F = 3.
Proof. We first prove that
ω3
X/Y ≥ 2h0(ωX/Y ) − 6.
Suppose we have proven the above result. As before, we still have
h0(ωX/Y ) ≥ χ(ωX) − (χ(OF ) + pg(F ))(g(Y ) − 1),
ω3
X/Y = K 3
X − 6K 2
F (g(Y ) − 1).
It is easy to check that
6K 2
F ≥ 2(2pg(F ) + 1) ≥ 2(χ(OF ) + pg(F ))
To prove that ω3
in these cases. Hence it will imply that K 3
X ≥ 2χ(ωX) by Remark 7.4.
X/Y ≥ 2h0(ωX/Y )−6, we can assume that h0(ωX/Y ) ≥
4. Hence we have the relative canonical map φωX/Y . Note that pg(F ) ≤
3 and we have
0 −→ H 0(ωX/Y (−F )) −→ H 0(ωX/Y ) −→ H 0(KF ).
Thus h0(ωX/Y (−F )) > 0 and it implies that f factors through φωX/Y .
Choose a blow-up π : X ′ → X such that the movable part M of
π∗ωX/Y is base point free. Write F ′ = π∗F and S as a general member
of M.
If dim φωX/Y (X) = 1, then
where Z ≥ 0 and a ≥ h0(ωX/Y ). Hence
M ∼num aF ′ + Z
ω3
X/Y ≥ a(π∗ωX/Y )2F ′ = aK 2
F ≥ 2h0(ωX/Y ).
If dim φωX/Y (X) = 2, denote by C ′ a general member of the induced
pencil by φM . Then MS is a free pencil and
where a ≥ h0(ωX/Y ) − 2. Hence
MS ∼num aC ′,
ω3
X/Y ≥ ((π∗ωX/Y )C ′)(h0(ωX/Y ) − 2).
On the other hand, since f factors through φωX/Y , we can find a general
F ′ such that C ′ ⊂ F ′. Then (π∗ωX/Y )C ′ = KF C, where C = π(C ′).
GEOGRAPHY OF IRREGULAR GORENSTEIN 3-FOLDS
23
Note that g(C) ≥ 2 and K 2
get KF C ≥ 2. So
F ≥ 2, by the Hodge index theorem, we can
ω3
X/Y ≥ 2(h0(ωX/Y ) − 2).
If dim φωX/Y (X) = 3, then dim φM (S) = 2. By Theorem 4.1, (MS)2 ≥
2h0(MS) − 4, which implies
ω3
X/Y ≥ M 3 ≥ 2h0(MS) − 4 ≥ 2h0(ωX/Y ) − 6.
It finishes the proof.
(cid:3)
In fact, the above method has been applied by Chen [12] for the
study of the canonical linear system. Here we use this method for the
relative canonical linear system.
Proposition 7.8. If pg(F ) = 3 and K 2
F = 2, then
K 3
X ≥
12
7
χ(ωX).
Proof. In this case, h1(OF ) = 0 and χ(OF ) = 4. Apply the same
method as in Proposition 7.7. We can still get
ω3
X/Y ≥ 2h0(ωX/Y ) − 6,
h0(ωX/Y ) ≥ χ(ωX ) − 7(g(Y ) − 1),
ω3
X/Y = K 3
X − 12(g(Y ) − 1).
Then the result follows from Remark 7.4.
(cid:3)
Remark 7.9. In fact, from the above inequalities, we can also get
K 3
X ≥ 2χ(ωX) − 2h1(OX) − 4.
But here h1(OX ) is still involved.
Proposition 7.10. If pg(F ) = 2 and K 2
F = 1, then
K 3
X ≥
4
3
χ(ωX).
Proof. By a very recent result of Hu (c.f.
case,
[23]), we know that in this
K 3
X ≥
4
3
χ(ωX) − 2.
Therefore, the result follows from Remark 7.4.
(cid:3)
Proposition 7.11. If pg(F ) = 1 and K 2
F > 1, then
K 3
X ≥ 2χ(ωX).
24
TONG ZHANG
Proof. In this case, we know that pg(X) > 0. First, let us assume that
pg(X) ≥ 2. Then the canonical maps of X will factor through f . So
we can write
KX ∼num rF + Z,
where r ≥ pg(X) and Z ≥ 0. It follows that
K 3
X = K 2
X(ωX/Y + (2g(Y ) − 2)F ) = (2g(Y ) − 2)K 2
F + ωX/Y K 2
X
≥ (2g(Y ) − 2)K 2
≥ 2χ(ωX).
F + rωX/Y KX F = (r + 2g(Y ) − 2)K 2
F
Second, if pg(X) = 1 and h1(OX) > 1, then χ(ωX) ≤ h1(OX ). We
have
K 3
X ≥ 6(g(Y ) − 1)K 2
F ≥ 2χ(ωX).
The only missing case is when pg(X) = 1 and h1(OX ) = 1. In this
case, χ(ωX) = 1 and g(Y ) = 1. Now let µ : Y → Y be any nontrivial
´etale map and X ′ = X ×µY . We have χ(ωX ′) > 1. So either pg(X ′) ≥ 2
or h1(OX ′) ≥ 2. If X ′ has Albanese dimension ≥ 2, then by Theorem
1.3,
If not, we are just in one of the first two cases and
K 3
X ′ ≥ 4χ(ωX ′).
In any situation, it will imply that K 3
X ≥ 2χ(ωX).
(cid:3)
K 3
X ′ ≥ 2χ(ωX ′).
Proposition 7.12. If pg(F ) = 1 and K 2
X ≥ 2χ(ωX).
K 3
F = 1, then we have
Since pg(F ) = 1 and K 2
Proof. Here we prove this result by studying the linear system 2KX.
F = 1, then h1(OF ) = 0, h0(2KF ) = 3 and
2KF is base point free (see [16]). Hence φ2KF is a generically finite
morphism of degree 4.
As before, we choose a blow-up π : X ′ → X such that the movable
part M of π∗(2KX) is base point free. Note that by the plurigenus
formula of Reid,
h0(M) = h0(2KX) ≥
1
2
K 3
X − 3χ(OX ).
Denote F ′ = π∗F . Consider the following restriction map:
res : H 0(X ′, M) → H 0(F ′, MF ′).
Denote by r the dimension of its image. So 1 ≤ r ≤ 3.
If r = 1, then φM (X ′) is a curve and φM factors through the fibration
X ′ → Y . In this case,
M ∼num aF ′ + Z
GEOGRAPHY OF IRREGULAR GORENSTEIN 3-FOLDS
25
with a ≥ h0(M). Hence we have
2K 3
X ≥ M(π∗KX )2 ≥ aK 2
F ≥
1
2
K 3
X − 3χ(OX ),
i.e., K 3 ≥ 2χ(ωX).
If r = 2, write L0 = M and P = π∗(2KX). Resume the notations in
Theorem 3.1 and Proposition 3.3. Similar to Theorem 7.1, we have
h0(L0) −
P L2
0
4
≤
d0
2
+(cid:18)r0 −
1
2
d0(cid:19) a0 +
N
Xi=1
(cid:18)ri −
1
2
di −
di−1 − di
4
(cid:19) ai.
Here r0 = h0(MF ′) and d0 = 2(π∗KF )(MF ′). Also, by Proposition
3.4, the above inequality still holds if we change r0 by r.
We claim that d0 = 4 in this case. In fact, we know that d0 ≤ 4K 2
F =
4. If r0 = 3, then MF ′ = π∗(2KF ) and d0 = 4K 2
F = 4. If not, then
r0 = r = 2. By [12, Lemma 2.5], we know that (π∗KF )(MF ′) ≥ 2,
which still gives d0 ≥ 4. Hence the claim is true and we have
r −
1
2
d0 ≤ 0.
For i > 0, we know that ri < r0 = 3 by Remark 3.2. Moreover, by
[12, Lemma 2.5] again, di ≥ 4 if ri = 2, and ri−1 ≥ 2 if ri = 1, which
implies di−1 ≥ 4. From this, one can check that for any i > 0,
ri −
1
2
di −
di−1 − di
4
≤ 0.
Therefore, we have
h0(2KX ) − 2K 3
X ≤ h0(L0) −
P L2
0
4
≤ 2.
If r = 3, then φM F = φ2KF . Thus φM is generically finite of degree
4. Choose a general member S ∈ M. We have
(MS)2 ≥ 4(h0(MS) − 2).
Hence
K 3
X ≥
1
8
M 3 ≥
1
2
(h0(MS) − 2) ≥
1
2
(h0(2KX) − 3).
As a result, if r ≥ 2, we always have
h0(2KX ) − 2K 3
X ≤ 3.
Apply the plurigenus formula and Remark 7.4 to the above two cases.
We can finish the whole proof.
(cid:3)
Now the proof of Theorem 1.5 is straightforward.
26
TONG ZHANG
Proof of Theorem 1.5. From Proposition 7.6, we know that K 2
holds when K 2
K 2
comes from Proposition 7.5, 7.7, 7.8, 7.10, 7.11, 7.12.
If
F ≤ 4, by Noether inequality, pg(F ) ≤ 3. In this case, the result just
(cid:3)
X ≥ 3χ(ωX) holds when K 2
F ≥ 4 and K 2
F ≥ 12 .
X ≥ 2χ(ωX)
8. Proof of Theorem 1.6
In this section, we give the proof of Theorem 1.6. We first give a
better version of the relative Noether inequality for fibered 3-folds over
curves.
Theorem 8.1. Let X be a Gorenstein minimal 3-fold of general type, Y
a smooth curve and f : X → Y is a fibration with a smooth general fiber
F . Suppose that F has no hyperelliptic pencil and (pg(F ), K 2
F ) 6= (2, 2).
Then
h0(ωX/Y ) ≤ (cid:18)1
6
+
3
2K 2
F (cid:19) ω3
X/Y +
K 2
F + 7
3
.
Proof. Still resume the notations in Theorem 3.1 and Proposition 3.3.
Denote L0 = P = ωX/Y . It follows that
h0(L0) ≤
N
Xi=0
airi;
L3
0 ≥ 2a0d0 +
N
Xi=1
ai(di−1 + di) − 2d0.
Hence
h0(L0) −
L3
0
6
≤
d0
3
+(cid:18)r0 −
1
3
d0(cid:19) a0 +
N
Xi=1
(cid:18)ri −
1
3
di −
di−1 − di
6
(cid:19) ai.
By the Castelnuovo inequality, we can always get
r0 ≤
1
3
d0 +
7
3
.
Recall that by Remark 3.2, r0 ≥ r1 > · · · > rN . We will prove in
Lemma 8.2 that if r0 > r1, then
ri ≤
1
3
di +
di−1 − di
6
+
3
2
,
(i > 0).
Assume the above result for now. It follows that
N
h0(L0) −
L3
0
6
≤
d0
3
+
a0 +
7
3
3
2
ai.
Xi=1
GEOGRAPHY OF IRREGULAR GORENSTEIN 3-FOLDS
27
By Lemma 3.5,
7
3
a0 +
3
2
N
Xi=1
ai ≤
3L3
0
2d0
+ 3 −
2
3
a0 ≤
3L3
0
2d0
+
7
3
.
Hence
h0(L0) ≤ (cid:18)1
6
+
3
2d0(cid:19) L3
0 +
d0 + 7
3
.
Now we assume that r0 = r1. It implies that KF has base locus by
Remark 3.2. Hence by the Castelnuovo inequality,
We have three exceptional cases.
K 2
F ≥ 3pg(F ) − 6.
Case 1. Suppose K 2
F ≥ 3pg(F ) − 4. We claim we still have
1
3
di−1 − di
(i > 0).
di +
ri ≤
+
3
2
,
6
This claim is true for i ≥ 2 by Lemma 8.2. We only need prove it
for i = 1.
If KF is composed with a pencil, by Theorem 4.4, we have
r1 ≤
1
3
d1 + 1.
Hence the claim holds.
If φKF is generically finite, then by Theorem 4.3,
(L1F1)2 ≥ 3r1 − 7.
Therefore, by the Hodge index theorem, d1 ≥ pK 2
gives us
F (L1F1)2, which
r1 ≤
d1 +
1
3
5
3
.
By our assumptions on K 2
can directly check that the claim holds in this case.
F , we know that d0 ≥ 3r0 − 4 ≥ d1 + 1. One
Case 2. Suppose K 2
F ≤ 3pg(F ) − 5 and KF has only isolated base
points. Note that in this case, since h0(L1F1) = h0(KF ), L1F1 is just
the proper transform of KF . Hence
(π∗
0KF )(L1F1) = K 2
F .
Again, choose a blow-up π : X ′ → X such that the movable part M
of π∗ωX/Y is base point free. Let F ′ = π∗F . Denote the new L0 = M
and P = π∗ωX/Y . We will have a new sequence of ri's and di's. Under
this new setting, for each i > 0, we have ri−1 > ri. By Lemma 8.2,
ri ≤
1
3
di +
di−1 − di
6
+
3
2
,
(i > 0).
28
TONG ZHANG
in this new setting. Run the same process as the non-exceptional case
and we will have
h0(ωX/Y ) ≤ (cid:18)1
6
+
3
2dM(cid:19) ω3
X/Y +
dM + 7
3
,
where dM = (π∗KF )(MF ′). We only need to show that dM = K 2
F .
This is quite similar to Theorem 7.1. In fact, we have π0(L1) ≤ π(M)
by the same reason as in Theorem 7.1. It implies that MF ′ is the
proper transform of KF . By our assumption, KF has no fixed part.
Thus π(M)F = KF and dM = K 2
F .
Case 3. Suppose K 2
F ≤ 3pg(F ) − 5 and KF has a fixed part, i.e.,
KF = V + Z
where Z > 0. In this case, L1F1 is the proper transform of V .
Let π : X ′ → X and M be the same as in Case 2. We still have
h0(ωX/Y ) ≤ (cid:18)1
6
+
3
2dM(cid:19) ω3
X/Y +
dM + 7
3
,
where dM = (π∗KF )(MF ′). Using the similar argument, we can prove
that π(M)F = V . As before, we only need to show that KF V = K 2
F .
By the 2-connectedness of the canonical divisor, V Z ≥ 2. Note that
V 2 ≥ 3pg(F ) − 7 by Theorem 4.3. Thus
3pg(F ) − 5 ≥ K 2
F ≥ KF V = V 2 + V Z ≥ 3pg(F ) − 5.
It implies that KF V = 3pg(F ) − 5 = K 2
F .
It finishes the proof.
As is said before, we need to show the following lemma.
Lemma 8.2. For any i > 0, if ri−1 > ri, we have
ri ≤
1
3
di +
di−1 − di
6
+
3
2
.
Proof. The lemma holds if
If not, then by Theorem 4.4,
ri ≤
ri =
1
3
1
3
di +
di +
4
3
.
5
3
.
In this case, di−1 − di ≥ 1. Otherwise, we would have
ri−1 ≥ ri + 1 =
1
3
di−1 +
8
3
.
It contradicts with Theorem 4.4.
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
GEOGRAPHY OF IRREGULAR GORENSTEIN 3-FOLDS
29
From now on, we assume that X is an irregular minimal Gorenstein
3-fold of general type, f : X → Y is the fibration over a smooth curve
Y induced by the Albanese map, and F is a smooth general fiber.
Proposition 8.3. If pg(F ) > 0 and (pg(F ), K 2
F ) 6= (2, 2), then
χ(ωX) ≤ (cid:18)1
6
+
3
2K 2
F (cid:19) K 3
X .
Proof. The proof is similar to Proposition 7.6. We sketch it here. From
Theorem 8.1, we get
h0(ωX/Y ) ≤ (cid:18) 1
6
+
We still have
2K 2
3
F(cid:19) K 3
X − (K 2
F + 9)(g(Y ) − 1) +
K 2
F + 7
3
.
h0(ωX/Y ) ≥ χ(ωX ) − (χ(OF ) + pg(F ))(g(Y ) − 1).
To prove the conclusion, by applying Remark 7.4, it suffices to prove
that
K 2
F + 9 ≥ χ(OF ) + pg(F ),
which follows from the Noether inequality.
(cid:3)
Proof of Theorem 1.6. If pg(F ) = 0, then the theorem is true by Propo-
sition 7.5.
If pg(F ) > 0, by Proposition 8.3, the theorem holds if
K 2
(cid:3)
F ≥ 9.
Remark 8.4. By the Castelnuovo inequality
K 2
F ≥ 3pg(F ) − 7,
we know that K 2
that under the same assumption as in Theorem 1.6, we have
F ≥ 9 provided that pg(F ) ≥ 6. In particular, it means
provided that pg(F ) ≥ 6.
K 3
X ≥ 6χ(ωX)
The same as Theorem 1.5, one might guess that K 2
F ≥ 3 will "al-
most" imply that K 3
X ≥ 3χ(ωX). But it could be probably optimistic.
Anyway, it is true when pg(F ) = 0 by Proposition 7.5. It is also true
when pg(F ) = 1.
Proposition 8.5. If pg(F ) = 1 and K 2
F > 2, then
K 3
X ≥ 3χ(ωX).
Proof. The proof is very similar to Proposition 7.11. We omit it here.
(cid:3)
30
TONG ZHANG
References
[1] M. A. Barja, Lower bounds of the slope of fibred threefolds, Internat. J. Math.
11 (2000), no. 4, 461 -- 491.
[2] M. A. Barja, Generalized Clifford-Severi inequality and the volume of irreg-
ular varieties, arXiv: 1303.3045v2
[3] W. Barth, K. Hulek, C. Peters, Van de Ven, Compact complex surfaces,
Second edition. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge.
A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics. 4. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004.
[4] A. Beauville, L'application canonique pour les surfaces de type g´en´eral, In-
vent. Math. 55 (1979), 121 -- 140.
[5] Ch. Birkenhake, H. Lange, Complex abelian varieties, Grundlehren der
Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 302. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer
1992.
[6] E. Bombieri, Canonical models of surfaces of general type, Publ. Math. IHES
42 (1973), 171 -- 219.
[7] F. Catanese, M. Chen, D. -Q. Zhang, The Noether inequality for smooth
minimal 3-folds, Math. Res. Lett. 13 (2006), 653 -- 666.
[8] J. A. Chen, M. Chen, The Noether inequality for Gorenstein minimal 3-folds,
arXiv: 1310.7709
[9] J. A. Chen, M. Chen, Explicit birational geometry of threefolds of general
type, I, Ann. Sci. Ec Norm. Sup. 43 (2010), 365 -- 394.
[10] J. A. Chen, M. Chen, D. -Q. Zhang, On the 5-canonical system of 3-folds of
general type, J. Reine Angew. Math. 603 (2007), 161 -- 181.
[11] J. A. Chen, C. Hacon, On the geography of threefolds of general type, J.
Algebra 321 (2009), no. 9, 2500 -- 2507.
[12] M. Chen, Inequalities of Noether type for 3-folds of general type, J. Math.
Soc. Japan 56 (2004), no. 4, 1131 -- 1155.
[13] M. Chen, Minimal threefolds of small slope and the Noether inequality for
canonically polarized threefolds, Math. Res. Lett. 11 (2004), no. 5 -- 6, 833 -- 852
[14] M, Chen, C. Hacon, On the geography of Gorenstein minimal 3-folds of
general type, Asian J. Math. 10 (2006), no. 4, 757 -- 763.
[15] L. Ein, R. Lazarsfeld, Singularities of theta divisors and the birational ge-
ometry of irregular varieties, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 10 (1997), no. 1, 243 -- 258.
[16] P. Francia, On the base points of the bicanonical system, Symposia Math.
32 (1991), 141 -- 150.
[17] M. Green, R. Lazarsfeld, Deformation theory, generic vanishing theorems,
and some conjectures of Enriques, Catanese and Beauville, Invent. Math.
90 (1987), no. 2, 389 -- 407.
[18] C. Hacon, A derived category approach to generic vanishing, J. Reine Angew.
Math. 575 (2004), 173 -- 187.
[19] C. Hacon, S. Kov´acs, Generic vanishing fails for singular varieties and in
characteristic p > 0, arXiv: 1212.5105.
[20] E. Horikawa, Algebraic surfaces of general type with small c2
1. I, Ann. of
Math. (2) 104 (1976), no. 2, 357 -- 387.
[21] E. Horikawa, Algebraic surfaces of general type with small c2
1. V, J. Fac. Sci.
Univ. Tokyo Sect. IA Math. 28 (1981), 745 -- 755.
[22] Y. Hu, Inequality of Noether type for smooth minimal 3-folds of general type,
arXiv: 1309.4618.
GEOGRAPHY OF IRREGULAR GORENSTEIN 3-FOLDS
31
[23] B. Hunt, Complex manifold geography in dimension 2 and 3, J. Differential
Geom. 30 (1989), no. 1, 51 -- 153.
[24] J. Koll´ar, Higher direct images of dualizing sheaves. I, Ann. of Math. (2)
123 (1986), no. 1, 11 -- 42.
[25] J. Koll´ar, Higher direct images of dualizing sheaves. II, Ann. of Math. (2)
124 (1986), no. 1, 171 -- 202.
[26] C. Liedtke, Algebraic surfaces in positive characteristic, to be published.
[27] C. Liedtke, Algebraic surfaces of general type with small c2
1 in positive char-
acteristic, Nagoya Math. J. 191 (2008), 111 -- 134.
[28] M. Mendes Lopes, R. Pardini, The geography of irregular surfaces, Current
developments in algebraic geometry, Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ. 59, Cam-
bridge Univ. Press (2012), 349 -- 378.
[29] M. Mendes Lopes, R. Pardini, A uniform bound on the canonical degree of
Albanese defective curves on surfaces, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 44 (2012), no.
6, 1182 -- 1188.
[30] Steven S. Y. Lu, On surfaces of general type with maximal Albanese dimen-
sion, J. Reine Angew. Math. 641 (2010), 163 -- 175.
[31] Steven S. Y. Lu, Holomorphic curves on irregular varieties of general type
starting from surfaces, Affine algebraic geometry, 205 -- 220, CRM Proc. Lec-
ture Notes, 54, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2011.
[32] Y. Miyaoka, The Chern classes and Kodaira dimension of a minimal variety,
in Algebraic Geometry, Sendai, 1985, Adv. Stud. Pure Math. 10 North-
Holland, Amsterdam, (1987) 449 -- 476.
[33] K. Ohno, Some inequalities for minimal fibrations of surfaces of general type
over curves, J. Math. Soc. Japan 44 (1992), 643 -- 666.
[34] R. Pardini, The Severi inequality K 2 ≥ 4χ for surfaces of maximal Albanese
dimension, Invent. Math. 159 (2005), no. 3, 669 -- 672.
[35] F. Severi, La serie canonica e la teoria delle serie principali de gruppi di
punti sopra una superifcie algebrica, Comment. Math. Helv. 4 (1932), 268 --
326.
[36] D. Shin, Noether inequality for a nef and big divisor on a surface, Commun.
Korean Math. Soc. 23 (2008), no. 1, 11 -- 18.
[37] C. Simpson, Subspaces of moduli spaces of rank one local systems, Ann. Sci.
´Ecole Norm. Sup. (4) 26 (1993), 361 -- 401.
[38] H. Sun, On the Clifford theorem for surfaces, Tohoku Math. J. (2) 64 (2012),
no. 2, 269 -- 285.
[39] G. Xiao, Fibered algebraic surfaces with low slope, Math. Ann. 276 (1987),
no. 3, 449 -- 466.
[40] X. Yuan, T. Zhang, Effective bound of linear series on arithmetic surfaces,
Duke Math. J. 162 (2013), no. 10, 1723 -- 1770.
[41] X. Yuan, T. Zhang, Relative Noether inequality on fibered surfaces,
arXiv: 1304.6122, submitted.
[42] T. Zhang, Severi inequality for varieties of maximal Albanese dimension,
arXiv: 1303.4043, submitted.
Department of Mathematics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Al-
berta T6G 2G1, Canada
E-mail address: [email protected]
|
1903.07014 | 1 | 1903 | 2019-03-17T01:55:11 | The $P=W$ identity for cluster varieties | [
"math.AG"
] | We find new examples of the $P=W$ identity of de Cataldo-Hausel-Migliorini by studying cluster varieties. We prove that the weight filtration of 2D cluster varieties correspond to the perverse filtration of elliptic fibrations which are deformation equivalent to the elliptic fibrations of types $I_b$ or $2I_b$. These examples do not arise from character varieties or moduli of Higgs bundles. | math.AG | math |
THE P = W IDENTITY FOR CLUSTER VARIETIES
ZILI ZHANG
Abstract. We find new examples of the P = W identities of de Cataldo-
Hausel-Migliorini by studying cluster varieties. We prove that the weight fil-
tration of 2D cluster varieties correspond to the perverse filtration of elliptic
fibrations which are deformation equivalent to the elliptic fibrations of types
Ib or 2Ib. These examples do not arise from character varieties or moduli of
Higgs bundles.
Contents
Introduction
1.
2. 2D cluster varieties and weight filtrations
3. Elliptic surfaces and perverse filtrations
4. Construction of diffeomorphisms
5. The P = W identities
References
1
3
5
7
9
13
1. Introduction
1.1. Perverse filtrations. Let Y be a Kahler manifold. The bounded derived
category of constructible sheaves Db
c(Y ) is naturally endowed with a perverse t-
structure. Denote pτ≤k the perverse truncation functor. There is a natural mor-
phism
pτ≤kK → K
for any object K ∈ Db
manifolds. By taking the cohomology functor, the natural morphism
c(Y ). Let h : X → Y be a proper morphism between Kahler
pτ≤kRh∗QX → Rh∗QX
defines a map between the cohomology groups
(1.1)
Hd−dim X+r (Y, pτ≤k(Rh∗QX [dim X − r])) → H d(X; Q),
where r = dim X ×Y X − dim X is the defect of the morphism f : X → Y . We
define PkH d(X; Q) ⊂ H d(X; Q) to be the image of (1.1), and we call the increasing
filtration
P0H ∗(X) ⊂ P1H ∗(X) ⊂ · · · ⊂ PkH ∗(X) ⊂ · · · H ∗(X; Q)
the perverse filtration associated with the map h. The associated graded pieces are
denoted by
GrP
k H ∗(X) := PkH ∗(X)/Pk−1H ∗(X).
1
2
ZILI ZHANG
In [6], de Cataldo and Migliorini proved that for any proper morphism between
smooth complex algebraic varieties, the associated perverse filtration satisfies the
relative hard Lefschetz property. More precisely,
(1.2)
GrP
r−k H ∗(X) ∪αk
−−−→ GrP
r+k H ∗(X), k ≥ 0
is an isomorphism for any ample 2-form α on X.
1.2. The P = W identities. Given any compact complex algebraic variety X and
a reductive group G, there are two natural moduli spaces associated with them,
the G-character variety MB and the moduli of Higgs G-bundles MD. The Higgs
moduli MD is properly fibered over an affine space h : MD → A. Simpson proved in
[19] that there is a canonical diffeomorphism between MB and MD. A remarkable
phenomenon discovered by de Cataldo, Hausel and Migliorini in [8] asserts that
under the identification induced by the Simpson's diffeomorphism
H ∗(MD; Q) =−→ H ∗(MB; Q),
the perverse filtration on H ∗(MD; Q) associated with h is expected to match the
halved mixed Hodge-theoretic weight filtration on H ∗(MB; Q) , i.e.
PkH ∗(MD) = W2kH ∗(MB) = W2k+1H ∗(MB), k ≥ 0.
(1.3)
The equality (1.3) is referred to as the P = W identity. Under the P = W identity,
the relative hard Lefschetz property (1.2) on H ∗(MD; Q) pulls back to the following
identity on H ∗(MB, Q)
(1.4)
GrW
d−2k H ∗(MB)
∪βk
−−→
∼=
GrW
d+2k H ∗(MB),
where d = dimC MB and β ∈ H 2(MB; Q) is of weight 4. Satisfying the identity
(1.4) is referred to as the curious hard Lefschetz property; see [12]. The curious
hard Lefschetz property is a necessary condition to expect a variety to be the W
side in a P = W identity. Unlike the relative hard Lefschetz property holds for any
proper morphism between complex algebraic varieties, the curious hard Lefschetz
property is rarely observed for algebraic varieties. Most of the known examples are
related to character varieties.
In [15], Lam and Speyer proved that cluster varieties of Louise type satisfy the
curious Hard Lefschetz property, which suggests that cluster varieties could be
the W sides to produce new P = W identities.
In this paper, we will focus on
the 2 dimensional cluster varieties and prove P = W identities (1.3) for them.
The corresponding P sides are deformation equivalence classes of certain elliptic
fibrations. Due to the lack of moduli interpretations, we don't expect a canonical
diffeomorphism between them. However, we will prove that under any diffeomor-
phism between them, the P = W identity holds. The existence of a diffeormophism
is proved by the theory of 4-manifold surgery.
Theorem 1.5 (Theorem 5.12). Let X be a 2 dimensional cluster variety. Then
there exists a deformation of elliptic fibrations such that for any elliptic fibration
h : Y → ∆ in the deformation, the following holds.
(1) The underlying C∞ manifolds of X and Y are diffeomorphic.
(2) For any diffeomorphism f : X → Y , the P = W identity holds, i.e. under
the pullback isomorphism f ∗ : H ∗(Y ; Q) = H ∗(X; Q),
PkH ∗(Y ; Q) = W2kH ∗(X; Q) = W2k+1H ∗(X; Q)
THE P = W IDENTITY FOR CLUSTER VARIETIES
3
for any k ≥ 0.
In [8], the P = W identity is proved between (twisted) G-character variety MB
of and the moduli of degree 1 G-Higgs bundles MD over a proper curve of genus
at least 2, for G = GL(2, C), SL(2, C) and PGL(2, C). In recent progress [18, 20],
the P = W identity is proved for five families of parabolic moduli spaces. The W
sides are parabolic character varieties on a punctured curve and the P sides are
moduli of parabolic Higgs bundles. The Hitchin map h : MD → A are (Hilbert
schemes of) elliptic fibrations of the types I0, I ∗
0 , IV ∗, III ∗ and II ∗ according to
the Kodaira's classification of elliptic fibrations. In [21], a numeric version of the
P = W identity is proved for certain 2 dimensional moduli spaces of wild parabolic
Higgs bundles of rank 2 over P1. The P = W identities for cluster varieties studied
in this paper turn out to be new because the elliptic fibrations on the P side are
obstructed to be defined on A1; they are defined on the unit disk only. Since the
singular fibers in our elliptic fibrations occur in the local study of the moduli wild
parabolic Higgs bundles over P1 with 2 marked points [13], our result suggests that
cluster varieties are analytically local version of character varieties. We do not
know how to interpret this observation precisely, but we do expect a deep relation
between them.
Acknowledgements. The author thanks Mark de Cataldo, Thomas Lam, Jun
Li, Jingchen Niu, Junliang Shen, David Speyer, Ruijie Yang and Boyu Zhang for
helpful discussions.
2. 2D cluster varieties and weight filtrations
In this section, we study the (co)homology groups and the mixed Hodge struc-
tures of 2 dimensional cluster varieties. They will be on the W side in the P = W
identities. We refer to [15, Section 4] for notations and definitions for cluster vari-
eties. In particular, we work with cluster varieties whose exchange matrices have
skew-symmetric principal parts. 2-dimensional cluster varieties are classified by the
number of frozen variables as follows.
(1) Type 0. No mutable variable and two frozen variables. Then we obtain the
cluster torus C∗ × C∗. Denote it by X0
(2) Type I. One mutable variable and one frozen variable. Then the exchange
matrix has the form (cid:18) 0
b (cid:19), where b is an positive integer. We denote the
corresponding cluster variety I Xb.
(3) Type II. Two mutable variables and no frozen variable. Then the exchange
matrix has the form(cid:18) 0
−b 0 (cid:19), where b is an positive integer. We deonte
the corresponding cluster variety II Xb.
b
We will omit subscripts when no confusion arises.
2.1. Type I. The cluster variety of type I Xb is studied in [15, Section 7].
Proposition 2.1. [15, Proposition 7.1] Let I Xb be the 2D cluster variety defined
by the exchange matrix
where b is a positive integer. Then
(cid:18) 0
b (cid:19) ,
4
ZILI ZHANG
(1) I Xb is the affine surface
I Xb = {(x, x′, y) ∈ C3 xx′ = yb + 1, y 6= 0}.
(2) I Xb deformation retracts to the locus x = x′, y = 1, which is b 2-spheres
arranging as a necklace. We denote them by S1, · · · , Sb.
(3) H1(I Xb; Q) = Q, and H2(I Xb; Q) = Qb, where generators in H2(I Xb; Q)
are represented by S1, · · · , Sb.
(4) The generator of H 1(I Xb; Q) is (2πi)−1d log y. The generators of H 2(I Xb; C)
are represented by differential forms γ, yγ, · · · , yb−1γ, where γ is the unique
regular extension of (2πi)−2d log x ∧ d log y. (See Remark 2.2.)
(5) The mixed Hodge structure on H ∗(I Xb) is split over Q. The dimensions of
graded pieces are listed in the table below.
0 GrW
1 GrW
2 GrW
3 GrW
4
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
H 0
H 1
H 2
GrW
b − 1
More precisely, the forms (2πi)yγ, · · · , (2πi)yb−1γ are in H 2(I Xb; Q(eπi/b)).
The (b − 1)-dimensional C-vector space they span has a Q-basis, and their
Q-span is W2H 2(I Xb; Q). The weight 4 piece GrW
4 H 2(I Xb; Q) is generated
by γ.
Remark 2.2. When x 6= 0, γ = (2πi)−2d log x ∧ d log y. When x′
6= 0, γ =
−(2πi)−2d log x ∧ d log y. They agree on the overlap since x′dx + xdx′ = byb−1
implies d log x ∧ d log y + d log x′ ∧ d log y = 0. Then γ extends to Xb by Hartogs'
theorem because the locus x = x′ = 0 is of codimension 2.
For later use, we need the following statements in the proof of [15, Theorem 7.1].
Proposition 2.3. For j = 1, · · · , b, and c = 1, · · · , b − 1, we have
γ =
1
b
ZSj
and
ycγ =
1
2πic
ZSj
(e(2j+1)cπi/b − e(2j−1)cπi/b).
2.2. Type II. The geometry, cohomology and mixed Hodge structures of II Xb are
described in the following proposition.
Proposition 2.4. Let II Xb be the 2D cluster variety defined by the exchange matrix
where b is a positive integer. We have the following.
b
(cid:18) 0
−b 0 (cid:19) ,
(1) II Xb is an affine surface obtained by gluing two copies of I Xb along X0.
More precisely, we have
II Xb = {(x, y, x′, y′) xx′ = yb + 1, yy′ = xb + 1} ⊂ C4.
It is covered by open sets Ub = {(x, y, x′, y′) ∈ II Xb y 6= 0} ∼= I Xb
and Vb = {(x, y, x′, y′) ∈ II Xb x 6= 0} ∼= I Xb, whose overlap is exactly
{(x, y, x′, y′) ∈ II Xb x 6= 0, y 6= 0} ∼= X0.
THE P = W IDENTITY FOR CLUSTER VARIETIES
5
(2) The locus of x = x′, y = 1 is b 2-spheres S1, · · · , Sb arranging as a
necklace. The locus of y = y′, x = 1 is also b spheres T1, · · · , Tb arrang-
ing as a necklace. Then H2(II Xb, Q) is generated by S1, · · · , Sb, T1, · · · , Tb
with relation S1 + · · · + Sb = T1 + · · · + Tb.
(3) H 2(II Xb; Q) is generated by γ, xγ, · · · , xb−1γ, yγ, · · · , yb−1γ, where γ is the
unique extension of (2πi)−2d log x ∧ d log y.
(4) The mixed Hodge numbers of II Xb are
GrW
GrW
H 0
H 1
H 2
GrW
2
0
0
0 GrW
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
More precisely, γ generates GrW
4 H 2(X), where γ is the unique extension of
(2πi)−2d log x∧d log y. The subspace spanned by xγ, · · · , xb−1γ, yγ, · · · , yb−1γ
in H 2(II Xb; C) has a Q-basis, and their Q-span is W2H 2(II Xb; Q).
3 GrW
4
0
0
0
0
1
0
2b − 2
Proof. Since the graph associated with the exchange matrix is acyclic, II Xb is
isomorphic to its lower cluster variety Spec C[x, x′, y, y′]/(xx′ − yb − 1, yy′ − xb − 1);
see [2, Corollary 1.21]. Statements (2), (3) and (4) follow from Mayer-Vietoris
arguments for the cover II Xb = Ub ∪ Vb and Proposition 2.1.
(cid:3)
3. Elliptic surfaces and perverse filtrations
In this section, we study the perverse filtrations associated with proper fibration
of an surface over the unit disk. They will be the P sides in the P = W identities. To
use the perverse decomposition theorem [17, Theorem 0.6], we will always assume
the surface to be Kahler.
3.1. Type I. We give a candidate for the P side which matches I Xb in the P = W
identity. Let h : I Yb → ∆ be the elliptic fibration on the disk of type Ib, where b
is an positive integer. General fibers of h are elliptic curves and the central fiber
h−1(0) is b 2-spheres arranged in a necklace. The monodromy matrix is
b
(cid:18) 1
0 1 (cid:19) .
We refer to [3, Section V] for more details. Denote ∆∗ = ∆ \ {0} the punctured
unit disk and j : ∆∗ ֒→ ∆ the open embedding.
Proposition 3.1. There is a perverse decomposition
where Q0 is the skyscraper sheaf of rank 1 supported at 0, and L is the Q-local
(3.2)
Rh∗QI Yb[1] ∼= (Q∆[1])M(j∗L[1] ⊕ Q⊕b−1
system of rank 2 on ∆∗ with the monodromy (cid:18) 1
0
numbers are
)[−1]M(Q∆[1])[−2],
b
0 1 (cid:19). In particular, the perverse
0 GrP
0
1
GrP
1
0
0
1 GrP
2
0
0
1
b − 1
H 0
H 1
H 2
6
ZILI ZHANG
Furthermore, P1H 2(I Yb) is spanned by the fundamental classes of the irreducible
components of the central fiber h−1(0) and
(3.3)
P1H 2(I Yb) = Im{H 2
c (I Yb) → H 2(I Yb)}.
Proof. The perverse decomposition (3.2) follows from [17, Theorem 0.6] and [5,
Theorem 3.2.3]. The monodromy of the local system L follows from the property of
elliptic fibration of type Ib. To compute the perverse numbers, we have the exact
sequence
(3.4)
0 → j∗L → Rj∗L → R1j∗L[−1] → 0.
By checking the stalks, we have R1j∗L = Q0. Cech cohomology argument shows
that H 2(∆, j∗L) = 0, and H i(∆, Rj∗L) = H i(∆∗, L) = Q for i = 0, 1. So the
associated long exact sequence of (3.4) is
0 → H 0(∆, j∗L) → Q → 0
→ H 1(∆, j∗L) → Q → Q
→
0
We conclude that H 0(∆, j∗L) ∼= Q and H 1(∆, j∗L) = 0. To see that P1H 2(Y ) is
spanned by the irreducible components of the singular fiber h−1(0), it suffices to
note that the cohomology of the direct summand Q⊕b−1
computes the fundamental
classes of irreducible components of the singular fiber.
It has dimension b − 1
since the central fiber h−1(0), the sum of fundamental classes of all irreducible
components, is cohomologous to 0. To prove (3.3), it suffices to study the image of
H2
c(∆, Rh∗QI Yb ) → H2(∆, Rh∗QI Yb). The decomposition (3.2) breaks this map as
the direct sum of the follow three maps
0
(3.5)
(3.6)
(3.7)
H 1
H 0
H 0
c (∆, j∗L) → H 1(∆, j∗L),
c (Q⊕b−1
) → H 0(Q⊕b−1
),
c (∆, Q∆) → H 0(∆, Q∆).
0
0
Since (3.5) and (3.7) are zero maps, and (3.6) is an identity, we see that the image
of H 2
c (I Yb) → H 2(I Yb) is exactly spanned by the fundamental classes of irreducible
components of the central fiber, which is P1H 2(I Yb).
(cid:3)
Remark 3.8. A natural question is whether the elliptic fibration of type Ib can be
realized as ambient complex manifolds of a proper morphism between algebraic
varieties. The answer is no. In fact, it follows from the decomposition theorem [1]
that the perverse sheaves in the perverse decomposition between algebraic varieties
must be semisimple. However, the summand j∗L[1] is not.
3.2. Type II. We give a candidate for the P side which matches II Xb in the P = W
identity. Let h : II Yb → ∆ be an elliptic fibration over unit disk with 2 singular
fibers h−1(p1) and h−1(p2) both of type Ib, whose vanishing cycles generate the
H 1 of a general fiber. The same argument as Proposition 3.1 leads to the following
proposition.
Proposition 3.9. We have a perverse decomposition
Rh∗QY [1] ∼= (Q∆[1])M(j∗L[1] ⊕ Q⊕b−1
p1 ⊕ Q⊕b−1
p2
)[−1]M(Q∆[1])[−2],
THE P = W IDENTITY FOR CLUSTER VARIETIES
7
where L is the rank 2 Q-local system on ∆ \ {p1, p2}, whose monodromy matrices
around p1 and p2 are (cid:18) 1
perverse numbers are
b
0 1 (cid:19) and (cid:18) 1
−b 1 (cid:19), respectively. In particular, the
0
GrP
0
1
0
0
GrP
1
0
0
2b − 2
GrP
2
0
0
1
H 0
H 1
H 2
Furthermore, P1H 2(II Yb) is spanned by the fundamental classes of the irreducible
components of the singular fibers h−1(p1) and h−1(p2).
4. Construction of diffeomorphisms
On the contrary to the P = W identities studied in [8], [18], [20] and [21],
we don't have moduli interpretations for cluster varieties and elliptic fibrations in
Section 2 and 3. So we need to construct diffeomorphisms between them to establish
the P = W identities. The constructions are based on handlebody decompositions.
As we will see in Section 5, the P = W identities do not depend the choice of the
diffeomorphism, which is not obvious a priori.
4.1. Type I. In this section, we construct a diffeomorphism f : I Xb → I Yb. We
will realize the cluster variety I Xb as the total space of a Lefschetz T 2-fibration over
R2 which shares the same combinatorial information as the corresponding elliptic
fibration h : I Yb → ∆. Monodromy invariants and the covering trick will produce
a desired diffeomorphism between I Xb and I Yb.
Proposition 4.1. Let I Xb be the surface xx′ = yb + 1 in C2 × C∗ as in Section
2.1. Consider the smooth map g : I Xb → R2 defined as follows.
g :
I Xb
(x, x′, y)
→
7→ (x2 − x′2, log y).
R2
The fiber over (0, 0) is a necklace consists of b 2-spheres and all other fibers are
2-tori.
Proof. Denote Xs,t = g−1(s, t) the fiber of g over point (s, t) ∈ R2. Then Xs,t is
cut out by equations x2 − x′2 = s and y = et. To study Xs,t, we consider map
ps,t :
Xs,t → C∗
7→ y
(x, x′, y)
(1) When s = t = 0, X0,0 is cut out by equations x = x′ and y = 1. So the
image of p0,0 is the unit circle. When y is not a b-th root of −1, we have
x = pyb + 1eiθ
yb + 1
x′ =
,
x
so p−1
0,0(y) is a circle parametrized by θ. When y is a b-th root of −1, we
have x = x′ = 0. Therefore, X0,0 is obtained by gluing b 2-spheres in a
circle.
8
ZILI ZHANG
(2) When (s, t) 6= (0, 0), the image ps,t(Xs,t) is a circle y = et. We claim that
s,t (y) is also a circle. In fact, we
for any y on the circle y = et, the fiber p−1
have x2 − x′2 = s and xx′2 = yb + 12, so
and
2
x =s s +ps2 + 4yb + 12
x′ =s −s +ps2 + 4yb + 12
2
.
Note that when (s, t) 6= (0, 0), at least one of x, x′ is nonzero, and that
x and x′ determine each other since y is fixed. So we get p−1
s,t (y) is a circle.
Therefore Xs,t is a topological circle bundle over a circle, hence is a torus.
(cid:3)
The existence of a diffeomphism between I Xb and I Yb follows from handlebody
decompositions on 4-manifolds. We refer to [10, 11, 14] for definitions of Lefschetz
fibrations, handlebody decompositions and plumbing constructions.
Theorem 4.2. There exists a diffeomorphism f : I Xb → I Yb.
Proof. We first prove the case when b = 1. It follows from Proposition 4.1 that both
g : I X1 → R2 and h : I Y1 → ∆ are Lefschetz T 2-fibrations with one critical point
on the central fiber. Up to diffeomorphism, such fibration is unique. Indeed, it is
obtained by attaching a 2-handle to the trivial T 2-fibration T 2 × ∆ → ∆ along the
vanishing cycle on any boundary fiber with framing −1. See [10, Section 8.2] and
[14, Page 242] for detailed treatments. So there is a diffeomorphism f : I Xb → I Yb.
For general b, I Xb = {xx′ = yb + 1, y 6= 0} is a b-fold ´etale covering of I X1, given by
y 7→ yb. Note that the fundamental group π1(Xb) = Z, and the covering Xb → X1
corresponds to the subgroup bZ ⊂ Z. I Yb is obtained as plumbing together b copies
of cotangent disk bundles of 2-spheres according to the graph of a cycle with b
nodes. In particular, I Y1 is obtained as the self-plumbing of one cotangent disk
bundle of a 2-sphere. It follows from the construction that I Yb is a smooth b-fold
covering of Y1, which corresponds to the subgroup bZ ⊂ Z = π1(I Y1). Now by the
classification of covering spaces, there exists a diffeomorphism f : I Xb → I Yb as
desired.
(cid:3)
4.2. Type II. In this section, we construct a diffeomorphism f : II Xb → II Yb.
Proposition 4.3. There exists a diffeomorphism f : II Xb → II Yb.
Proof. By Proposition 2.4.(1), the cluster variety II Xb ∈ C4 is obtained by gluing
{xx′ = yb + 1, y 6= 0} and {yy′ = xb + 1, x 6= 0} along the locus {x 6= 0, y 6= 0}. We
cover II Xb by three open sets:
X ◦ = II Xb ∩ {x 6= 0, y 6= 0},
Uǫ = II Xb ∩ {x < ǫ, yb + 1 < ǫ},
Vη = II Xb ∩ {xb + 1 < η, y < η}.
Then for small ǫ and η, Uǫ and Vη are both diffeomorphic to b disjoint copies of
R4, and Uǫ ∩ Vη = φ. Let π : X ◦ → R2 be the trivial elliptic fibration defined by
THE P = W IDENTITY FOR CLUSTER VARIETIES
9
(x, y) 7→ (log x, log y). The intersection U ◦
of the fibration π as
ǫ = X ◦ ∩ Uǫ can be described in terms
π(U ◦
ǫ ) =(cid:26)(s, t) ∈ R2 s < log ǫ,
log(1 − ǫ)
b
< t <
log(1 + ǫ)
b
(cid:27) ,
and for such (s, t), U ◦
let u = arg x, v = arg y be a parametrization of the fiber π−1(s, t), then
ǫ ∩ π−1(s, t) is consists of b copies of S1 × R1. More precisely,
Uǫ∩π−1(s, t) =(cid:26)(u, v) ∈ T 2
(2c + 1)π − θs,t,ǫ
b
< v <
(2c + 1)π + θs,t,ǫ
b
, 0 ≤ c < b(cid:27)
where θs,t,ǫ = arccos (1 + e2t − ǫ2)/2et. Note that if we let ǫ → 0, then s → −∞,
t → 0, and θs,t,ǫ → 0. In the language of attaching handle, gluing Uǫ onto X ◦ is
exactly attaching b 2-handles along the b circles
(cid:26)(u, v) ∈ T 2v =
(2c + 1)π
b
, 0 ≤ c ≤ b − 1(cid:27) ,
on the boundary fiber over (−∞, 0). Note that X ◦ ∪ Uǫ = I Xb. So the framing
numbers at the b attaching circles have to be −1. We apply the same argument to
attach Vη to X ◦, which is equivalent to attach b 2-handles along the b circles
(cid:26)(u, v) ∈ T 2 u =
(2c + 1)π
b
, 0 ≤ c ≤ b − 1(cid:27)
on the boundary fiber over (0, −∞) with framing numbers -1. Therefore, II Xb is
diffeomorphic to II Yb, the total space of an elliptic fibration over open disk with
two Ib singular fibers, whose vanishing cycles form a basis of H1(T 2, Z), where T 2
is a general fiber.
(cid:3)
5. The P = W identities
5.0. Type 0. Let h : Y0 → ∆ be the natural projection pr2 : E × ∆ → ∆, where
E is any elliptic curve. Then X0 = C∗ × C∗ and Y0 are both diffeomorphic to
R1 × R1 × S1 × S1, hence are diffeomorphic. The P = W identity follows from the
study of A0 case in [21, Section 5].
Proposition 5.1. For any diffeomorphism f : X0 → Y0, the P = W identity (1.3)
holds.
5.1. Type I. In this section, we show that for the cluster variety I Xb (Section 2.1)
and the elliptic fibration h : I Yb → ∆ (Section 3.2), any diffeomorphism between
them induces a P = W identity.
Proposition 5.2. Let Z be the locus cut out by x = x′ and y = 1 in I Xb. Then
W2H 2(I Xb) is the kernel of the linear functional
: H 2(I Xb) → Q.
ZZ
Proof. By Proposition 2.1.(5), W2H 2(I Xb)⊗C is generated by C-basis yγ, · · · , yb−1γ.
By Proposition 2.3, we have
ycγ =
ZZ
b
Xj=1ZSj
ycγ =
1
2πic
b
Xj=1
(e(2j+1)cπi/b − e(2j−1)cπi/b) = 0
10
ZILI ZHANG
for c = 1, · · · , b − 1 and
γ =
ZZ
b
Xj=1ZSj
γ = 1.
We conclude that W2H 2(I Xb) ⊗ C is exactly the kernel of the linear functional
: H 2(X; C) → C.
ZZ
Since Z is a rational homology class, the kernel of RZ admits rational basis, and
hence the conclusion follows from the following lemma.
(cid:3)
Lemma 5.3. Let V be a Q-vector space and let W1, W2 be two subspaces of V .
Suppose that W1 ⊗ C and W2 ⊗ C are identical as subspaces of V ⊗ C, then W1 = W2
as subspaces of V .
Proposition 5.4. Let h : I Yb → ∆ be the elliptic fibration of type Ib. Let F =
h−1(0) be the singular central fiber, viewed as a homology class. Then P1H 2(I Yb)
is the kernel of the linear functional
: H 2(I Yb) → Q.
ZF
Proof. When b = 1, P1H 2(I Y1) = 0. H 2(Y ) is spanned by a section class σ with
RF σ = 1. Hence the result follows. When b > 1, the self-intersections of all
irreducible components of F are −2 and the intersection numbers between adjacent
components are 1. It follows that all exceptional curves in central fiber F are in
the kernel of the pairing. By Proposition 3.1, P1H 2(I Yb) is exactly the (b − 1)-
dimensional vector space spanned by the classes of exceptional divisors. Since the
pairing H2(I Yb) × H 2(I Yb) → Q is non-degenerate, the kernel of RF is at most
of dimension b − 1. Therefore the kernel of RF is exactly of dimension b − 1 and
coincides with P1H 2(I Yb).
(cid:3)
Theorem 5.5. For any diffeomorphism f : I Xb → I Yb, the P = W identity (1.3)
holds.
Proof. By comparing the mixed Hodge numbers in Proposition 2.1 and perverse
numbers in Proposition 3.1, it suffices to identify W2H 2(I Xb) and P1H 2(I Yb) via
the diffeomorphism. Since Z and F are deformation retracts of I Xb and I Yb respec-
tively, the homology class Z in H2(I Xb, Q) is sent to F or −F in H2(I Yb; Q) via
any diffeomorphism. Now by the Proposition 5.2 and Proposition 5.4, P1H 2(I Yb) =
W2H 2(I Xb) and hence the P = W identity holds.
(cid:3)
Corollary 5.6.
W2H 2(I Xb) = Im{H 2
c (I Xb) → H 2(I Xb)}.
Proof. This identity follows from Proposition 3.1 and Theorem 5.5.
(cid:3)
5.2. Type II. In this section, we prove the P = W identity for II Xb and II Yb via
any diffeomorphism.
Proposition 5.7.
W2H 2(II Xb) = Im{H 2
c (II Xb) → H 2(II Xb)}.
THE P = W IDENTITY FOR CLUSTER VARIETIES
11
Proof. By Proposition 2.4.(1), II Xb = Ub ∪ Vb, where Ub ∼= Vb ∼= I Xb and Ub ∩ Vb =
X0. Denote iU : Ub → II Xb and iV : Vb → II Xb. We first show that the diagram
H 2
c (II Xb)
ι
H 2(II Xb)
i∗
i∗
H 2
c (Ub) ⊕ H 2
c (Vb)
ι′
H 2(Ub) ⊕ H 2(Vb)
commutes, where i∗(α, β) = iU ∗α − iV ∗β and i∗α = (i∗
V α). By the symmetry
c (Ub) maps 0 in H 2(Vb) via
between U and V , it suffices to show that a basis of H 2
c (Ub) ∼=
i∗ ◦ ι ◦ i∗. To see this, by Proposition 2.1.(3) and Proposition 2.4.(2), H 2
H2(Ub) is generated by spheres S1, · · · , Sb. Their images under i∗ ◦ ι ◦ i∗ are the
Borel-Moore classes represented by Si ∩ Vb. They are the boundaries of the Borel-
Moore 3-classes in Vb represented by
U α, −i∗
{(x, y, x′, y′) ∈ Vb 0 < x <qyb + 1, y = 1, (2πi − 1)/b < arg y < (2πi + 1)/b},
c (Ub∩Vb) ∼=
hence are 0 in H 2(Vb). This proves that the diagram commutes. Since H 1
H 1
c (X0) = 0, the compactly supported Mayer-Vietoris sequence shows that i∗ is
surjective. Similarly, H 1(Ub) ⊕ H 1(Vb) ∼= H 1(Ub ∩ Vb) implies that i∗ is injective.
It follows that i∗ induces an isomorphism Im ι ∼−→ Im ι′. Now the identity follows
from Corollary 5.6 and
W2H 2(II Xb) ∼−→ W2H 2(Ub) ⊕ W2H 2(Vb).
(cid:3)
Theorem 5.8. For any diffeomorphism f : II Xb → II Yb, the P = W identity (1.3)
holds.
Proof. By the perverse numbers and mixed Hodge numbers in Proposition 2.4 and
Proposition 3.9, it suffices to prove
P1H 2(II Yb) = W2H 2(II Xb).
Proposition 2.4 implies that P1H 2(II Yb) = Im{H 2
sition 5.7 implies that W2H 2(II Xb) = Im{H 2
the proof.
c (II Yb)}, and Propo-
c (II Xb)}. This completes
(cid:3)
c (II Yb) → H 2
c (II Xb) → H 2
5.3. Deformation invariance of the perverse filtrations.
Definition 5.9. A deformation of elliptic fibrations is a commutative diagram of
Kahler manifolds
Y
D
v
h
S,
where dim Y = dim S + 2 and dim D = dim S + 1, such that
(1) h is proper surjective. v is surjective.
(2) v ◦ h : Y → S is a locally trivial C∞ fibration.
(3) For any s ∈ S, the restriction hs : (v ◦ h)−1(s) → v−1(s) is an elliptic
fibration.
12
ZILI ZHANG
Two elliptic fibrations h1 : Y1 → D1 and f2 : Y2 → D2 are deformation equivalent
if there exists a deformation of elliptic fibrations (Y, D, S), and two points s1, s2 on
S, such that h1 = hs1 and h2 = hs2.
Remark 5.10. In this definition, the topological type of the fibration is allowed to
be deformed. Only the underlying C∞ manifold of the total space is required to be
fixed. For example, the elliptic fibration h : II Yb → ∆ is deformation equivalent to
the elliptic fibration of type II. See [16] for more examples.
Proposition 5.11. If two fibrations h1 : Y1 → D1 and h2 : Y2 → D2 are defor-
mation equivalent, then there exists a diffeomorphism t : Y1 → Y2 such that the
pull-back map
is an isomorphism of perverse filtrations, i.e.
t∗ : H ∗(Y2) ∼−→ H ∗(Y1)
t∗ : PkH ∗(Y2) ∼−→ PkH ∗(Y1).
Proof. By Definition 5.9.(2), the local C∞ triviality of v ◦ h produces a diffeomor-
phism t : Y1 → Y2. It also follows from the triviality that vanishing cycle φQY = 0
and R(v ◦ h)∗QY has locally constant cohomology sheaves. Also note that QY is
simple. The proposition follows from [4, Theorem 3.2.1.(iii)].
(cid:3)
Combining Proposition 5.1, Theorem 5.5, Theorem 5.8 and Proposition 5.11, we
have the main theorem.
Theorem 5.12. Let X be a 2 dimensional cluster variety. Then there exists a
deformation of elliptic fibrations such that for any elliptic fibration h : Y → D in
the deformation, the following holds.
(1) The underlying C∞ manifolds of X and Y are diffeomorphic.
(2) For any diffeomorphism f : X → Y , the P = W identity holds, i.e. under
the pullback isomorphism f ∗ : H ∗(Y ; Q) = H ∗(X; Q),
PkH ∗(Y ; Q) = W2kH ∗(X; Q) = W2k+1H ∗(X; Q)
for any k ≥ 0.
More precisely, when X = X0, I Xb or II Xb, the corresponding elliptic fibration
h : Y → D is deformation equivalent to Y0 → ∆, I Yb → ∆, II Yb → ∆, respectively.
Since perverse filtrations encode topological information only, it is natural to
ask whether the P side is compeletely determined on the underlying C∞ manifold
structure of X. We make the following conjecture.
Conjecture 5.13. Let X be a 2 dimensional cluster variety. Let h : Y → ∆ be a
Lefschetz T 2-fibration over the unit disk, such that Y is diffeomorphic to X. Then
for any diffeomorphism f : X → Y , the P = W identity (1.3) holds.
When the fibration h : Y → ∆ underlies a Kahler structure, the arguments in
Proposition 3.1 and Proposition 3.9 show that the perverse numbers are determined
by the Betti numbers, and hence match the mixed Hodge numbers of X. It also
follows that the peverses numbers are constant in a family of Lefschetz T 2-fibrations
which vary smoothly (instead of holomorphically). More understanding on Kirby
calculus and the behavior of perverse filtartions in non-complex setting will be
helpful to relate any such Y to I Yb or II Yb to compare the perverse filtrations.
THE P = W IDENTITY FOR CLUSTER VARIETIES
13
References
[1] A. Beilinson, J. Bernstein, P. Deligne, Faisceaux pervers, Asterisque 100, 1982.
[2] A. Bernstein, S. Formin, A. Zelevinski, Cluster algebras III: Upper bounds and double Bruhat
cells, Duke Math. J. Volume 126, Number 1 (2005), 1-52.
[3] W. Barth, K. Hulek, C. Peters, A. vande Ven, Compact complex surfaces, Springer, 2004.
[4] M. de Cataldo, D. Maulik, The perverse filtration for the Hitchin fibration is locally constant,
arXiv:1808.02235.
[5] M. de Cataldo, L. Migliorini, Intersection forms, topology of algebraic maps and motivic
decompositions for resolutions of threefolds, Algebraic cycles and Motives, London Mat.Soc.,
Lecture Notes Series, n.343, vol.1, pp.102-137, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK,
2007.
[6] M. de Cataldo, L. Migliorini, The Hodge theory of algebraic maps Ann. Scient. Ec. Norm.
Sup., 4e serie, t.38, 2005, p. 693-750.
[7] M. de Cataldo, L. Migliorini, The perverse filtration and the Lefschetz hyperplane theorem
Annals of Mathematics, Vol. 171, No. 3, 2010, 2089-2113.
[8] M. de Cataldo, L. Migliorini, T. Hausel, Topology of Hitchin systems and Hodge theory of
character varieties: the case A1, Annals of Mathematics 175 (2012), 1329-1407.
[9] S. Fomin, A. Zelevinsky, Cluster algebras. I. Foundations. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 15 (2002),
no. 2, 497-529.
[10] R. E. Gompf, A. I. Stipsicz, 4-Manifolds and Kirby Calculus, Graduate Studies in Mathe-
matics, Volume 20, Springer, 1989.
[11] J. Harer, A. Kas, R. Kirby, Handlebody decompositions of complex surfaces, Memoirs of the
American Mathematical Society, Number 350, 1986.
[12] T. Hausel, F. Rodriguez-Villegas Mixed Hodge polynomials of character varieties, Invent.
math. 174, 555 -- 624 (2008).
[13] P. Ivanics, A. I. Stipsicz, S. Szab´o,Hitchin fibrations on moduli of irregular Higgs bundles and
motivic wall-crossing, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra. DOI:10.1016/j.jpaa.2018.12.016.
[14] R. Kirby, P. Melvin, The E8 -- manifold, singular fibers and handlebody decompositions, Ge-
ometry and Topology Monographs, Volumn 2: Proceeding of the Kirbyfest, 233-258, 1998.
[15] T. Lam, D. Speyer, Cohomology of cluster varieties. I. Locally acyclic case, arXiv:
1604.06843.
[16] I. Naruki, On confluence of singular fibers in elliptic fibrations, Publ. RIMS, Kyoto Univ. 23
(1987), 409-431.
[17] M. Saito, Decomposition theorem for proper Kahler morphisms Tohoku Math. J. 42 (1990),
127-148.
[18] S. Szab´o, Perversity equals weight for Painlev´e spaces, arXiv: 1802.03798.
[19] C. T. Simpson, Higgs bundles and local systems, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci. 75
(1992) 595.
[20] J. Shen, Z. Zhang, Perverse filtrations, Hilbert schemes, and the P=W conjecture for para-
bolic Higgs bundles, arXiv: 1810.05330.
[21] Z. Zhang Multiplicativity of perverse filtration for Hilbert schemes of fibered surfaces, Ad-
vances in Mathematics, Volume 312, 25 May 2017, Pages 636-679.
University of Michigan, Department of Mathematics
E-mail address: [email protected]
|
1310.5554 | 2 | 1310 | 2015-09-28T10:57:50 | Non-rigid quartic 3-folds | [
"math.AG"
] | Let $X\subset \mathbb{P}^4$ be a terminal factorial quartic $3$-fold. If $X$ is non-singular, $X$ is \emph{birationally rigid}, i.e. the classical MMP on any terminal $\mathbb{Q}$-factorial projective variety $Z$ birational to $X$ always terminates with $X$. This no longer holds when $X$ is singular, but very few examples of non-rigid factorial quartics are known. In this article, we first bound the local analytic type of singularities that may occur on a terminal factorial quartic hypersurface $X\subset \mathbb{P}^4$. A singular point on such a hypersurface is either of type $cA_n$ ($n\geq 1$), or of type $cD_m$ ($m\geq 4$), or of type $cE_6, cE_7$ or $cE_8$. We first show that if $(P \in X)$ is of type $cA_n$, $n$ is at most $7$, and if $(P \in X)$ is of type $cD_m$, $m$ is at most $8$. We then construct examples of non-rigid factorial quartic hypersurfaces whose singular loci consist (a) of a single point of type $cA_n$ for $2\leq n\leq 7$ (b) of a single point of type $cD_m$ for $m= 4$ or $5$ and (c) of a single point of type $cE_k$ for $k=6,7$ or $8$. | math.AG | math | NON-RIGID QUARTIC 3-FOLDS
HAMID AHMADINEZHAD AND ANNE-SOPHIE KALOGHIROS
Abstract. Let X ⊂ P4 be a terminal factorial quartic 3-fold. If X is non-singular, X is bira-
tionally rigid, i.e. the classical MMP on any terminal Q-factorial projective variety Z birational
to X always terminates with X. This no longer holds when X is singular, but very few examples
of non-rigid factorial quartics are known. In this article, we first bound the local analytic type
of singularities that may occur on a terminal factorial quartic hypersurface X ⊂ P4. A singular
point on such a hypersurface is either of type cAn (n ≥ 1), or of type cDm (m ≥ 4), or of type
cE6, cE7 or cE8. We first show that if (P ∈ X) is of type cAn, n is at most 7, and if (P ∈ X) is
of type cDm, m is at most 8. We then construct examples of non-rigid factorial quartic hyper-
surfaces whose singular loci consist (a) of a single point of type cAn for 2 ≤ n ≤ 7 (b) of a single
point of type cDm for m = 4 or 5 and (c) of a single point of type cEk for k = 6, 7 or 8.
5
1
0
2
p
e
S
8
2
]
.
G
A
h
t
a
m
[
2
v
4
5
5
5
.
0
1
3
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
1. Introduction
A classical problem in algebraic geometry is to determine which quartic hypersurfaces in P4 are
rational. In their seminal paper [IM71], Iskovskikh and Manin prove that a nonsingular quartic
hypersurface X4 ⊂ P4 is birationally rigid (see the precise definition below) and, in particular, is
not rational.
The classical Minimal Model Program (MMP) shows that a uniruled projective 3-fold Z with
terminal singularities is birational to a Mori fibre space X/S. More precisely, there is a small
morphism f : eZ → Z where eZ is terminal and Q-factorial (see [KM98, Section 6.3]) and the
classical MMP ψ : eZ 99K X terminates with a Mori fibre space X/S (see [KM98, Section 3]).
Neither the morphism f nor the birational map ψ is unique in general. Mori fibre spaces are end
products of the MMP and hence should be seen as distinguished representatives of their classes
of birational equivalence. In general, there may be more than one Mori fibre space in a class of
birational equivalence. The pliability of a uniruled terminal 3-fold Z is the set of distinguished
representatives in its class of birational equivalence, that is:
P(Z) = {X/T Mori fibre space birational to Z}/ ∼,
where ∼ denotes the square birational equivalence defined in [Cor95, Definition 5.2]. If X itself is
a Mori fibre space, X is called birationally rigid if its pliability is P(X) = {[X]}.
A quartic hypersurface X ⊂ P4 with terminal singularities is a Mori fibre space precisely when it
is factorial, that is when every Weil divisor on X is Cartier. The two conditions on the singularities
of a Mori fibre space are quite different: requiring that the singularities of X are terminal is a local
analytic condition, while factoriality is a global topological condition. Mella extended Iskovskikh
and Manin's result and proved that terminal factorial quartic hypersurfaces with no worse than
ordinary double points are birationally rigid (see [Mel04, Theorem 2]). Factoriality is a crucial
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 14E05, 14J30, 14J45.
Key words and phrases. Birational Maps, Quartic Hypersurfaces, Birational Rigidity.
The first author was partially supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [grant number P22766-N18]
and the second author was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [grant number
EP/H028811/1].
1
2
HAMID AHMADINEZHAD AND ANNE-SOPHIE KALOGHIROS
Indeed, general determinantal quartic hypersurfaces are examples
condition for this to hold.
of rational nodal quartic hypersurfaces (see the introductions of [Pet98, Mel04]) but are not
factorial. Todd discusses several examples of non-factorial rational nodal quartic hypersurfaces:
the Burkhardt quartic studied in [Tod36] has 45 nodes (see also [Pet98, Section 5.1]); an example
with 36 nodes is mentioned in [Tod33] (see also [Pet98, Example 6.4.2]) and two examples with
40 nodes are studied in [Tod35] (see also [Pet98, Examples 6.2.1, 6.2.2]). In fact, most terminal
non-factorial quartic hypersurfaces are rational [Kal12].
However, factoriality alone is not sufficient to guarantee birational rigidity. There are several
known examples of non-rigid terminal factorial quartic hypersurfaces: an example with a cA2
point is studied in [CM04] and entry No. 5 in Table 1 of [Ahm12] is an example with a cA3 point.
In this paper, we show that these examples are not pathological by constructing many examples
of non-rigid terminal factorial quartic 3-folds with a singular point of type cAn for n ≥ 2. It is
conjectured that a terminal factorial quartic 3-fold with no worse than cA1 points is rigid; we
address this conjecture in forthcoming work.
Terminal 3-fold hypersurfaces have isolated cDV singularities [Rei87, (3.1)]; the local analytic
type of a singular point thus belongs to one of two infinite families -- cAn for n ≥ 1, or cDm for
m ≥ 4 -- or is cE6, cE7 or cE8. The first step in our study is to bound the local analytic type of
singularities that can occur on a terminal factorial quartic 3-fold. We use topology and singularity
theory to bound the local analytic type in the cAn and cDm case, and we show:
Proposition 1.1. If (P ∈ X) is a cAn (resp. cDm) point on a terminal factorial quartic hyper-
surface X ⊂ P4, then n ≤ 7 (resp. m ≤ 8).
The methods used to prove Proposition 1.1 do not restrict the local analytic type of points of
type cE. In fact, all possible local analytic types of cE points are realised: we give examples of
terminal factorial quartic hypersurfaces with isolated singular points of type cE6, cE7 or cE8 (see
Example 4.14). As is noted in Remark 3.10, the bound on the local analytic type of cA points is
sharp, but we do not believe that the bound is optimal in the cD case .
If X is a terminal factorial quartic 3-fold, the Sarkisov Program shows that any birational
map X 99K X ′ to a Mori fibre space X ′/S′ is the composition of finitely many Sarkisov links
(see Section 2 for definitions and precise statements). Thus X is non-rigid precisely when there
exists a link X 99K X ′ where X ′/S′ is a Mori fibre space. Such a link is initiated by a morphism
f : Z → X, where Z is terminal and Q-factorial, and f contracts a divisor to a singular point or
to a curve passing through a singular point. In general, little is known about the explicit form
of the morphism f . When f contracts a divisor to a cAn point (P ∈ X), Kawakita shows that
the germ of f is a weighted blowup, and classifies possible weights according to the local analytic
type of (P ∈ X) [Kaw01, Kaw02, Kaw03].
For each n with 2 ≤ n ≤ 7, we write down the equation of a quartic hypersurface X with
a morphism f : Z → X that contracts a divisor to a cAn point and initiates a Sarkisov link.
After a suitable embedding of X as a complete intersection in a larger weighted projective space
P = P(15, α, β), we recover f as the restriction of a weighted blowup F → P whose weights
are determined by Kawakita's classification. The variety F is a toric variety of Picard rank 2,
and therefore it is possible to write down explicitly all contracting rational maps F 99K U to a
projective variety U . We then check that the birational geometry of F induces a Sarkisov link
X 99K X ′, where X ′/S′ is a Mori fibre space.
To our knowledge, our construction is the first use of Kawakita's classification to write down
explicit global uniruled 3-fold extractions. We prove:
NON-RIGID QUARTIC 3-FOLDS
3
Theorem 1.2. If (P ∈ X) is a singular point of type cAn on a terminal factorial quartic 3-fold,
then n ≤ 7. There are examples of non-rigid terminal factorial quartic 3-fold with a singular
point of type cAn for 2 ≤ n ≤ 7.
We also give examples of non-rigid terminal factorial quartic 3-folds with cD4, cD5 and cE6, cE7
and cE8 singular points (Examples 4.12, 4.13, and 4.14). We make the following general conjec-
ture, which generalises [CM04, Section 1.3 and Theorem 1.6].
Conjecture 1.3. Let X ⊂ P4 be a terminal factorial quartic hypersurface. Then P(X) is finite
and P(X) = {[X]} precisely when X has no worse than cA1 singularities.
In particular, no
terminal factorial quartic hypersurface is rational.
Outline of the paper. Section 2 recalls general results on the Sarkisov program -- that is, on
the study of birational maps between Mori fibre spaces -- in dimension 3 and on the geography
of models of Mori dream spaces. When X is a terminal Q-factorial Fano 3-fold with ρ(X) = 1,
a Sarkisov link X 99K X ′ is initiated by a morphism f : Z → X that contracts a single divisor.
Here, we state precise conditions for f to initiate a Sarkisov link. We urge the reader who is
mainly interested in explicit examples and in bounds on singularities to skip this section on a
first reading and refer back to it as and when needed.
Section 3 collects results on terminal singularities in dimension 3. We concentrate on the case
of terminal Gorenstein singularities, which are those that appear on hypersurfaces. We use the
existence of smoothings of terminal Gorenstein Fano 3-folds to bound the local analytic type of
singularities on a terminal quartic hypersurface. Last, we recall Kawakita's classification of the
germs of divisorial contractions with centre at a cAn point in terms of the local analytic type of
that point.
Section 4 presents our examples of non-rigid terminal factorial quartic 3-folds. We consider
hypersurfaces X ⊂ P4 that can be embedded as general complete intersections of type (2, 2, 4)
in a weighted projective space P = P(15, 22). For suitable weighted blowups F : F → P, the
restriction f = FZ : Z → X (where Z is the proper transform of X) is a divisorial contraction
with centre at a cAn point, and the birational geometry of F induces a Sarkisov link X 99K X ′.
We give examples of non-rigid quartic hypersurfaces with a cAn point for all 2 ≤ n ≤ 7, and
explain our construction in detail in a few cases. We also give examples of non-rigid terminal
factorial quartic hypersurfaces with singular points of type cD and cE.
Acknowledgements. We would like to thank Ivan Cheltsov, Alessio Corti, Masayuki Kawakita,
Yuri Prokhorov, Josef Schicho and Constantin Shramov for useful comments and conversations.
We thank the referee for many helpful suggestions.
Throughout this paper, we work with normal projective varieties over C.
2. Preliminary results
General results in birational geometry. Let X be a normal projective variety and k ∈
{Z, Q, R}. We denote by WDivk(X) the group of Weil k-divisors, by Divk(X) the group of k-
Cartier k-divisors on X, and by ∼k and ≡ the k-linear and numerical equivalence of R-divisors.
We write Pic(X)k = Divk(X)/ ∼k and N 1(X)k = Divk(X)/ ≡.
The nef, effective and pseudo-effective cones in N 1(X)R are denoted by Nef(X), Eff(X) and
Eff(X). The movable cone Mov(X) is the closure of the cone in N 1(X)R spanned by the numerical
classes of divisors whose stable base locus has codimension at least 2. If C ⊂ N 1(X)R is a cone,
we always denote its closure by C.
We recall the definitions of models of divisors introduced in [BCHM10].
4
HAMID AHMADINEZHAD AND ANNE-SOPHIE KALOGHIROS
Definition 2.1. Let Z be a normal projective variety and D ∈ DivQ(Z).
1. A birational map f : Z 99K X is contracting if f is proper and f −1 contracts no divisor. The
map f is small if both f and f −1 are contracting birational maps.
2. Let D ∈ DivQ(Z) be a Q-Cartier divisor and let f : Z 99K X be a contracting birational map
such that f∗D is Q-Cartier. The map f is D-nonpositive if for a resolution (p, q) : W → Z × X,
p∗D = q∗D′ + E,
where E is effective and q-exceptional. When Supp E contains the strict transform of all
f -exceptional divisors, f is said to be D-negative.
3. Assume that D is effective. The map f is a semiample model of D if f is D-nonpositive, X is
normal and projective and D′ is semiample. If ϕ : X → S is the semiample fibration defined
by D′, the ample model of D is the composition ϕ ◦ f : Z 99K X → S.
Notation 2.2. If D = KZ is a canonical divisor on Z, we say that a birational contraction is
K-nonpositive (resp K-negative) instead of KZ-nonpositive (resp. KZ -negative).
Definition 2.3. 1. A birational contraction X
ϕ
99K X ′ between Q-factorial varieties is elementary
if ϕ is either a morphism whose exceptional locus is a prime divisor on X or a small birational
map that fits into a diagram
X
/❴❴❴❴❴❴❴
X ′
ϕ
❆❆❆❆❆❆❆❆
f
}⑤⑤⑤⑤⑤⑤⑤⑤
f ′
W
where f and f ′ are morphisms and the Picard ranks of X, X ′ and W satisfy
ρ(X) = ρ(X ′) = ρ(W ) + 1.
2. Assume that X is Q-factorial and let D be an effective Q-divisor on X. A D-MMP on X is a
composition of D-nonpositive elementary contractions X 99K X1 99K · · · 99K Xn = XD, where
XD is a semiample model for D.
Geography of models of Mori dream spaces. We first recall the definition of Mori dream
spaces and the properties that will be important in this paper.
Definition 2.4. [HK00] Let Z be a projective Q-factorial variety with Pic(Z)Q = N 1
Mori dream space if
Q(Z); Z is a
(i) Nef(Z) is the affine hull of finitely many semiample line bundles,
(ii) there are finitely many small birational maps fi : Z 99K Zi to projective Q-factorial varieties
Zi satisfying (i) such that Mov Z = ∪f ∗
i (Nef Zi).
When Z is a Mori dream space, we may run the D-MMP for every Q-divisor D. More precisely,
there is a finite decomposition [KKL14, Section 5]:
Eff Z =
NGi=1
Ci, where for all i
(a) Ci is a rational polyhedral cone,
(b) there is a birational contraction to a Q-factorial normal projective variety ϕi : Z 99K Zi that
is the ample model of all D ∈ Ci and a semiample model of all D ∈ Ci.
/
}
NON-RIGID QUARTIC 3-FOLDS
5
A Mori dream space Z with ρ(Z) = 2 always has a 2-ray configuration, which is defined as
follows. Let M1, M2 be Q-divisors such that
Mov Z = R+[M1] + R+[M2].
Denote by ϕ1 : Z 99K Z1 (resp. ϕ2 : Z 99K Z2) the ample model of M1 + εM2 (resp. εM1 + M2) for
an arbitrarily small positive rational number ε. Let fi : Zi → Xi be the ample model of (ϕi)∗Mi.
Then, the birational map ϕi is small, and fi is a fibration when [Mi] lies on the boundary of
Eff Z, and ϕi is a birational map that contracts a single exceptional divisor otherwise. These
maps fit in a diagram which we call a 2-ray configuration:
(1)
Z1
ϕ1
❴❴❴❴❴❴
ϕ2
/❴❴❴❴❴❴
Z
Z2
f1
X1
f2
X2
When f : Z → X is a divisorial contraction, we may assume that ϕ1 is the identity map and that
X is the ample model of M1 (i.e. that f = f1).
The Sarkisov Program. We recall a few notions on birational maps between end products of
the classical MMP.
Definition 2.5. Let X be a terminal Q-factorial variety, and p : X → S a morphism with positive
dimensional fibres (so that dim S < dim X). Then X/S is a Mori fibre space if p∗OX = OS, −KX
is p-ample and ρ(X) = ρ(S) + 1.
The classical MMP shows that any uniruled terminal Q-factorial variety Z is birational to a
Mori fibre space, so that P(Z) 6= ∅. The Sarkisov program decomposes any birational map between
Mori fibre spaces [X/S], [X ′/S′] ∈ P(Z) into a finite number of Sarkisov links [Cor95, HM13].
Next, we recall the definition of Sarkisov links.
Definition 2.6. A divisorial contraction f : Z → X is a morphism between terminal Q-factorial
varieties such that −KZ is f -ample, f∗OZ = OX , and ρ(Z) = ρ(X) + 1.
We sometimes call f an extraction when we study properties of f in terms of its target X.
Definition 2.7. Let X/S and X ′/S′ be two Mori fibre spaces. A Sarkisov link is a birational
map ϕ : X 99K X ′ of one of the following types:
(I) A link of type I is a commutative diagram:
Z
/❴❴❴
X ′
⑦⑦⑦⑦⑦⑦⑦⑦
w♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
S′
X
S
where Z → X is a divisorial contraction and Z 99K X ′ a sequence of flips, flops and inverse
flips between terminal Q-factorial varieties;
o
o
/
/
w
6
HAMID AHMADINEZHAD AND ANNE-SOPHIE KALOGHIROS
(II) A link of type II is a commutative diagram:
Z
/❴❴❴
Z ′
❇❇❇❇❇❇❇❇
⑦⑦⑦⑦⑦⑦⑦⑦
X ′
S′
X
S
where Z → X and Z ′ → X ′ are divisorial contractions and Z 99K Z ′ a sequence of flips,
flops and inverse flips between terminal Q-factorial varieties;
(III) A link of type III is the inverse of a link of type I;
(IV) A link of type IV is a commutative diagram:
X
/❴❴❴❴❴❴❴
X ′
S
❅❅❅❅❅❅❅❅
S′
~⑥⑥⑥⑥⑥⑥⑥⑥
T
where X 99K X ′ is a sequence of flips, flops and inverse flips between terminal Q-factorial
varieties.
Definition 2.8. Let X/S be a Mori fibre space and f : Z → X an extraction; f initiates a link
if it fits into an Sarkisov link.
The following lemma is a criterion for a divisorial extraction to initiate a link. It is of little
practical use, but we want to highlight some of the subtleties that arise when proving that a 2-ray
configuration is indeed a Sarkisov link.
Lemma 2.9. Let X be a terminal Q-factorial Fano variety with ρ(X) = 1 and let f : Z → X be
an extraction. Then f initiates a link if and only if the following hold:
(i) Z is a Mori dream space,
(ii) if ψ : Z 99K Z ′ is a small birational map and Z ′ is Q-factorial, then Z ′ has terminal singu-
larities,
(iii) [−KZ ] ∈ int(Mov Z).
Proof. Assume that f : Z → X is a divisorial contraction that initiates a link. Then, as X is
a Fano 3-fold with rational singularities, h1(X, OX ) = 0, and since f∗OZ = OX , by the Leray
spectral sequence, h1(Z, OZ ) = 0 and we have the equality Pic(Z)Q = N 1
Q(Z).
Since ρ(Z) = 2, if f initiates a Sarkisov link, then following the notation of Definition 2.7,
there are 2 distinct birational contractions Z → X and Z 99K X ′ that are compositions of finitely
many elementary maps (flips, flops, inverse flips and divisorial contractions) between terminal
Q-factorial varieties. Thus Z has a 2-ray configuration as above, and Z is automatically a Mori
dream space. The chambers of the decomposition of Eff Z are indexed by the divisorial contraction
Z → X and by the elementary maps that decompose Z 99K X ′.
Furthermore, if X ′ is Fano, then
(2)
−KZ ∈ R+[f ∗(−KX )] + R+[(g ◦ ψ)∗(−KX ′)] = Mov Z
/
/
~
NON-RIGID QUARTIC 3-FOLDS
7
and the class of −KZ is in the interior of Mov Z because X and X ′ have terminal singularities
and Z → X and Z ′ → X ′ are not isomorphisms.
If X ′/S′ is a Mori fibre space with dim S′ ≥ 1, then KX ′ = ψ∗KZ , and
(3)
−KZ ∈ R+[f ∗(−KX )]+R+[ψ∗(−KX ′ + AS′)]
(R+[f ∗(−KX)] + R+[ψ∗AS′] = Mov Z,
where AS′ is the pullback of a suitable ample divisor on S′ and the class of −KZ is in the interior
of Mov Z because, as before, X is terminal so that R+[−KZ ] 6= R+[f ∗(−KX )] and −KZ is big so
that −KZ 6∈ R+[ψ∗AS′].
We have seen that Z is a Mori dream space so that if D is any movable Q-divisor, the D-
MMP terminates with a Q-factorial semiample model for D which we denote ZD. The small
birational map Z 99K ZD factors Z 99K X ′, therefore Z 99K ZD is the composition of finitely
many elementary contractions between terminal Q-factorial varieties, and in particular, ZD is
terminal. Let Z 99K Z ′ be an arbitrary small birational map, and assume that Z ′ is Q-factorial.
Let D be the proper transform of an ample Q-Cartier divisor on Z ′; then D is mobile because
Z 99K Z ′ is small. By construction, Z ′ ≃ Proj R(Z, D) is the ample model of D, and if ZD is the
end product of a D-MMP on Z, then ZD → Z ′ is a morphism and a small map. Since Z ′ and ZD
are both Q-factorial, it follows that they are isomorphic, so that Z ′ has terminal singularities.
Conversely, if Z is a Picard rank 2 Mori dream space then
Mov Z = R+[M1] + R+[M2] ⊂ Eff(Z) = R+[D1] + R+[D2]
for effective Z-divisors M1, M2, D1 and D2. Since f : Z → X is a divisorial extraction, f is the
ample model of M1 6= D1; note that D2 needs not be distinct from M2. When M2 6= D2, let Z ′
be the ample model of M2 + εM1 for an arbitrarily small positive rational number ε and let X ′
be the ample of model of M2. Then, Z 99K Z ′ is a small birational map, and Z ′ has terminal
singularities by assumption (ii). The birational map Z 99K Z ′ is small, hence we may identify
divisors on Z and on Z ′ and, under this identification, Mov Z is equal to Mov Z ′, so that [−KZ ′] is
in the interior of Mov Z ′ by assumption (iii). It follows that the morphism Z ′ → X ′ is K-negative
and that X ′ has terminal singularities. When M2 = D2, let X ′ be the ample model of M2 + εM1
for an arbitrarily small positive rational number ε and let S′ be the ample model of M2. Then,
X ′ is terminal by assumption (ii) and the fibration X ′ → S′ is K-negative by assumption (iii).
Since M2 is not a big divisor, dim S′ < dim X ′ and X ′/S′ is a Mori fibre space.
(cid:3)
Remark 2.10. Condition (ii) may only fail when the 2-ray configuration on Z involves an antiflip
because flips and flops of terminal varieties are automatically terminal. For example, consider
Z = P(OP1 ⊕ OP1(−2) ⊕ OP1(−2)),
then Z is a Mori fibre space (a P2-bundle over P1) and a Mori dream space on which (i), (iii)
hold but (ii) fails.
It follows that the 2-ray configuration on Z does not produce a Sarkisov
link. Example 4.11 is a Sarkisov link involving an antiflip, and we check that condition (ii) holds
directly.
Remark 2.11. Note that condition (ii) always holds when M2 is of the form KZ + Θ for Θ a
nef divisor. Indeed, in that case, every D ∈ Mov Z ∩ Big Z is of the form KZ + Θ′ for Θ′ nef, and
every D-negative birational contraction is K-nonpositive (see [Kal13, 2.10]). In particular, the
ample model ϕD : Z 99K ZD is a D-negative birational contraction, hence is KZ-nonpositive, so
that for any resolution (p, q) : U 99K Z × ZD, we have:
p∗KZ = q∗KZD + E,
8
HAMID AHMADINEZHAD AND ANNE-SOPHIE KALOGHIROS
where E is an effective q-exceptional divisor. This implies that for any divisor F over ZD, the
discrepancy aF (ZD) ≥ aF (Z), and that ZD has terminal singularities if Z does.
3. Terminal singularities on quartic 3-folds
In this section, we recall some results on the local analytic description of terminal hypersurface
singularities in dimension 3 and we bound the local analytic type of singularities on terminal
factorial quartic hypersurfaces in P4.
3.1. Local analytic description and divisorial extractions. We first recall a few results on
isolated hypersurface singularities.
Singularity theory. Let C[[x1, · · · , xn]] be the ring of complex formal power series in n variables,
and C{x1, · · · , xn} ⊂ C[[x1, · · · , xn]] the subring of formal power series with nonzero radius of
convergence. For F ∈ C{x1, · · · xn}, (F = 0) is a germ of a complex analytic set, and the
singularity (F = 0) is the scheme SpecC C[[x1, · · · xn]]/(F ).
Let F ∈ C[[x1, · · · , xn]] be a power series, and d a positive integer. We denote by Fd the degree
d homogeneous part of F and by F≥d the series Pk≥d Fk. The multiplicity of F is mult F =
min{d ∈ NFd 6= 0}. Two power series F, G are equivalent if there exist an automorphism
ϕ = (ϕ1, · · · , ϕn) ∈ Aut(C[[x1, · · · xn]]) and a unit u ∈ (C[[x1, · · · xn]])∗ such that
u(x1, · · · , xn)G(x1, · · · , xn) = F (ϕ1, · · · , ϕn).
In other words, F and G are equivalent if the singularities (F = 0) and (G = 0) are isomorphic.
We denote the equivalence of power series by F ∼ G.
In what follows, as we are only interested in isolated critical points, by [AGZV85, I, Section 6.3]
we may (and will) assume that the power series u, F and G all have nonzero radius of convergence
and that ϕ ∈ Aut(C{x1, · · · xn}).
Definition 3.1.
1. The singularity (h(x, y, z) = 0) is Du Val if h is equivalent to one of the standard forms:
An
Dm
E6
E7
E8
x2 + y2 + zn+1 = 0 for n ≥ 0
x2 + y2z + zm−1 = 0 for m ≥ 4
x2 + y3 + z4 = 0
x2 + y3 + yz3 = 0
x2 + y3 + z5 = 0
2. A singularity (F (x, y, z, t) = 0) is compound Du Val if F is equivalent to:
(4)
h(x, y, z) + tf (x, y, z, t) = 0
where (h = 0) is a Du Val singularity. The singularity (F = 0) is cAn (resp. cDm, cEk) if in
(4), h is of type An (resp. Dm, Ek) with n (resp. m, k) minimal.
Theorem 3.2. [Kol98, Theorem 2.8] Let F (x, y, z, t) ∈ C[[x, y, z, t]] define a cA singularity, then
one of the following holds:
cA0: F ∼ x,
cA1: F ∼ x2 + y2 + z2 + tm for m ≥ 2,
cAn, n ≥ 2: F ∼ x2 + y2 + f≥n+1(z, t), where f≥n+1(z, t) has no multiple factors.
NON-RIGID QUARTIC 3-FOLDS
9
z,t, we may assume that zn+1 appears with
Remark 3.3. Up to change of coordinates on P1
coefficient 1 in f≥n+1(z, t). Since (F = 0) is an isolated singularity, f≥n+1(z, t) has no repeated
factor and contains at least one monomial of the form tN or ztN −1 for N ≥ n+1. When N > n+1,
as in [AGZV85, Section 12],
F ∼ x2 + y2 + zn+1 + tN or F ∼ x2 + y2 + zn+1 + ztN −1
for N ≥ n + 1. Similarly, when N = n + 1, we have
F ∼ x2 + y2 + fn+1(z, t)
where fn+1 is a homogeneous form with no repeated factor of degree n + 1.
Theorem 3.4. [Kol98, Theorem 2.9] Let F (x, y, z, t) ∈ C[[x, y, z, t]] define a cD singularity, then
one of the following holds:
cD4: F ∼ x2 + f≥3(y, z, t), where f3 is not divisible by the square of a linear form,
cD>4: F ∼ x2 + y2z + aytr + h≥s(z, t), where a ∈ C, r ≥ 3, s ≥ 4 and hs 6= 0. This has type
cDm for m = min{2r, s + 1} if a 6= 0 and m = s + 1 otherwise.
Definition 3.5. The Milnor number of the singularity (F = 0) is
µ(F = 0) = dimC C[[x1, · · · , xn]]/JF ,
where JF = ( ∂F
∂x1
derivatives of F .
, · · · , ∂F
∂xn
) is the Jacobian ideal of F , i.e. the ideal generated by the partial
If F ∼ G, the Milnor numbers of (F = 0) and of (G = 0) are equal. The Milnor number
µ(F = 0) is finite precisely when (F = 0) is an isolated singularity.
Lemma 3.6. 1. If (F = 0) is a cAn singularity with n ≥ 1 then µ(F = 0) ≥ n2.
xy + zn+1 + tN or F ∼ xy + zn+1 + ztN −1 for N > n + 1 then µ(F = 0) ≥ n(N − 1).
If F ∼
2. If (F = 0) is a cDm singularity with m > 4 then µ(F = 0) ≥ m(m − 2).
Proof. If (F = 0) is a cAn singularity with n ≥ 1, then F ∼ xy + f (z, t), where f (z, t) has
multiplicity greater than or equal to n + 1. Since
µ(F = 0) = µ(xy + f (z, t) = 0), we have µ(F = 0) = dimC C[[z, t]]/Jf .
deg ∂f
∂z ≥ n(N − 1).
In all cases, since µ(F = 0) is finite and f has no repeated factor, C[[z, t]]/Jf has dimension
∂z · deg ∂f
Now assume that (F = 0) is a cDm singularity with m > 4. Then, as in [AGZV85, I, Section
12], if F0 is the quasihomogeneous part of F then µ(F = 0) = µ(F0 = 0), and µ(F0 = 0) is
given by the formula [AGZV85, I, Corollary 3, p. 200]. In the notation of Theorem 3.4, using the
methods of [AGZV85, I, Section 12], we obtain that:
(a) either F0 ∼ x2 + y2z + ytr + zs or F0 ∼ x2 + y2z + ytr + zs−1t and µ(F0 = 0) ≥ m(m − 2),
(b) or F0 ∼ x2 + y2z + h(z, t), where h(z, t) is of the form zs + tN , zs−1t + tN , zN + ts or zN + zts−1
for some N ≥ s. In all cases, µ(F0 = 0) ≥ m(m − 2).
(cid:3)
3.2. Bounding the local analytic type of singularities on a terminal factorial Fano
Mori fibre space. We bound the local analytic type of singularities on a terminal factorial
Fano 3-fold with Picard rank 1.
10
HAMID AHMADINEZHAD AND ANNE-SOPHIE KALOGHIROS
Theorem 3.7. [Nam97] Let X be a Fano 3-fold with terminal Gorenstein singularities. Then X
has a smoothing, i.e. there is a one parameter flat deformation:
X
X
{0}
/ ∆
with Xt smooth when t 6= 0. For all t ∈ ∆, Xt is Fano, ρ(X) = ρ(Xt) and −K 3
X = −K 3
Xt.
The existence of a smoothing X ֒→ X allows us to bound the Milnor numbers of singularities
on X.
Theorem 3.8. [NS95, Theorem 3.2] Let X be a normal projective 3-fold with isolated rational
hypersurface singularities such that H 2(X, OX ) = (0). Denote bi(X) the i-th Betti number for
the singular cohomology of X. If there is a smoothing X ֒→ X , then
b4(X) − b2(X) = b3(X) − b3(Xt) + XP ∈Sing X
µ(X, P )
for t ∈ ∆ r {0}, where µ(X, P ) is the Milnor number of (X, P ).
When X is a terminal and factorial Fano 3-fold, the second and fourth Betti numbers of X are
equal, that is b2(X) = b4(X), so that:
(5)
µ(X, P ) = b3(Xt) − b3(X) ≤ b3(Xt).
XP ∈Sing X
The third Betti numbers of non-singular Fano 3-folds with Picard rank 1 are known (see [IP99,
Table 12.2]), and we obtain a bound on the sum of Milnor numbers of singular points on X that
only depends on −K 3
X = 4, we have the following.
X. When −K 3
Proposition 3.9. Let X ⊂ P4 be a terminal factorial quartic hypersurface. If (P ∈ X) is a
singular point of type cAn, then n is at most 7.
If (P ∈ X) is a singular point of type cDm, then m is at most 8.
Proof. Let X ֒→ X be a smoothing, then for all t 6= 0, Xt is a nonsingular quartic hypersurface
and b3(Xt) = 60 (see [IP99, Table 12.2]). By Theorem 3.8, we have µ(X, P ) is bounded above by
60, and the result follows immediately from the lower bounds obtained in Lemma 3.6.
(cid:3)
Remark 3.10. The bound on the local analytic type of cA points is sharp, Example 4.9 is an
example of a terminal factorial quartic hypersurface with a cA7 singular point.
We do not believe that the bound on the local analytic type of cD points is optimal, as we have
not been able to write down examples attaining it. We give examples of terminal factorial quartic
hypersurfaces with isolated singular points of type cD4, cD5 and cE6, cE7 and cE8 in Section 4.3.
Remark 3.11. By the classification of non-singular Fano 3-folds, the bounds on the local analytic
type of singularities lying on a terminal factorial Fano 3-fold with Picard rank 1 and anticanonical
degree −K 3 > 4 are even more restrictive than in the case of a quartic hypersurface.
Remark 3.12. We can use the same methods to bound the local analytic type of singularities
on an arbitrary terminal Gorenstein Fano 3-fold X with ρ = 1. Indeed, by Theorem 3.8:
XP ∈Sing X
µ(X, P ) ≤ b3(Xt) + σ(X),
/
/
/
NON-RIGID QUARTIC 3-FOLDS
11
where σ(X) = b4(X) − 1 is the defect of X. The defect of terminal Gorenstein Fano 3-folds with
ρ = 1 is bounded in [Kal11]. For example, if X is a (not necessarily factorial) terminal quartic
hypersurface, then
XP ∈Sing X
µ(X, P ) ≤ 75,
so that if (P ∈ X) is a cAn point, n ≤ 8.
Our main interest in this article is in non-rigid quartic 3-folds; in particular, we have not tried
to write down examples of non-factorial quartic hypersurfaces with a singular point of type cA8.
We believe that such an example would be found with extra work.
3.3. Divisorial extractions with centre at a cAn point. Kawakita classifies the germs of
divisorial extractions f : Z → X with centre at a cAn point. We recall this classification here, as
we will use it in Section 4.
Theorem 3.13. [Kaw02, Kaw03] Let (P ∈ X) be a cAn point and f : Z → X a divisorial
extraction with f (Exc f ) = {P }. Then, one of the following holds:
1. General type: under a suitable local analytic identification
(P ∈ X) ≃ 0 ∈ {xy + g(z, t) = 0} ⊂ C4,
and f is the blowup of C4
of f , a and r1 are coprime integers, and
x,y,z,t with weights (r1, a(n + 1) − r1, a, 1), where a is the discrepancy
g(z, t) = zn+1 + g≥a(n+1)(z, t)
has weighted degree a(n + 1). In particular,
E = Exc f ≃ {xy + ga(n+1)(z, t) = 0} ⊆ P(r1, a(n + 1) − r1, a, 1),
and if we denote by r2 = a(n + 1) − r1, then we have aE3 = 1/r1 + 1/r2.
2. Exceptional type, n = 1: under a suitable local analytic identification
(P ∈ X) ≃ 0 ∈ {xy + z2 + t3 = 0} ⊂ C4,
and f is the blowup with weights (1, 5, 3, 2), f has discrepancy a = 4.
3. Exceptional type n = 2: under a suitable local analytic identification
(P ∈ X) ≃ 0 ∈ {xy + z3 + g≥4(z, t) = 0} ⊂ C4,
the discrepancy of f is 3 and Z has exactly one non-Gorenstein point
(Q ∈ Z) ≃ {0} ∈ {x2 + y2 + z2 + t2 = 0} ⊂ C4/
1
4
(1, 3, 3, 2).
Remark 3.14. Let X ⊂ P4 be a terminal factorial quartic hypersurface. Then, the discrepancies
of possible divisorial extractions f : Z → X with centre at a cAn point (P ∈ X) can be bounded
in the same way as in Proposition 3.9. Indeed, by Lemma 3.6, if there is an extraction of general
type in Theorem 3.13, the Milnor number µ(X, P ) satisfies
but by Theorem 3.8, µ(X, P ) ≤ 60. It follows that the discrepancy of f satisfies:
µ(X, P ) ≥ n(a(n + 1) − 1),
n 6, 7
a
5
4
3
2
1 ≤ 2 ≤ 3 ≤ 5 ≤ 11
α = x0x1 + q(x3, x4)
β = x0x2 + q′(x3, x4)
αβ + ϕ′
4(x0, · · · x4) = 0
⊂ P(15, 22) = P,
X =
12
HAMID AHMADINEZHAD AND ANNE-SOPHIE KALOGHIROS
4. Examples of non-rigid terminal quartics
In this section, we present examples of non-rigid terminal factorial quartic hypersurfaces X ⊂
P4. Each of these examples has a Sarkisov link initiated by an extraction f : Z → X that contracts
a divisor to a singular point. In most of our examples, the singular point is of type cAn, so that the
germ of f is a weighted blowup as in Kawakita's classification (Theorem 3.13). Our examples are
obtained by globalising these germs: we can write down an explicit description of f in projective
coordinates.
Let X ⊂ P4 be a terminal factorial quartic hypersurface, and assume that P = (1:0:0:0:0) ∈ X
is a cAn point. Up to projective change of coordinates, the equation of X can be written:
X = {ϕ4(x0, · · · , x4) = x2
0x1x2 + x0ψ3(x1, · · · , x4) + θ4(x1, · · · , x4) = 0},
where ϕ4 is a homogeneous polynomial of degree 4 in the variables x0, · · · , x4 and ψ3 and θ4 are
homogeneous polynomials in the variables x1, · · · , x4.
The first step in our construction is to look for examples of hypersurfaces X ⊂ P4 that can be
embedded in a larger weighted projective space P in such a way that the restriction of a suitable
weighted blowup F : F → P is a divisorial contraction f : Z → X. We take X to be a complete
intersection of the form:
for homogeneous forms α, β of degree 2. The equation of the hypersurface X ⊂ P4 is recovered
by substituting α, β in the third equation.
Explicitly, we want the germ of f : Z → X to be a weighted blowup of general type in the
classification of Theorem 3.13. This means that up to local analytic identification, denoting by a
the discrepancy of f , we have
(6)
(P ∈ X) ≃ 0 ∈ {xy + g(z, t) = 0} ⊂ C4, where g(z, t) = zn+1 + g≥a(n+1)(z, t)
and g has weighted degree a(n + 1).
We choose ϕ4 so that for suitable α, β, setting x0 = 1 in the third equation gives:
αβ + g(x3, x4) + (higher weighted order terms) = 0.
In other words, the restrictions of α, β to {x0 = 1} define the local analytic isomorphisms that
bring the equation of X ∩{x0 = 1} into the desired form (6). The divisorial contraction f : Z → X
we construct are restrictions of weighted blowups F : F → P(15, 22), where the weights assigned
to the variables α, β, x3, x4 are as in Theorem 3.13.
The second step in our construction is to show that some of these divisorial contractions initiate
Sarkisov links. Since F is a Mori dream space (it is toric), it has a 2-ray configuration as in (1).
We check directly that the 2-ray configuration
(7)
Z ⊂ F
Φ
/❴❴❴❴❴❴
F+
restricts to a Sarkisov link Z
/❴❴❴
Z +
,
F
X ⊂ P
F +
P+
X
X +
or that we can find another embedding Z ⊂ F ′ via unprojection such that the 2-ray configuration
on F ′ restricts to a Sarkisov link. Note that we do not make any assumption on the singularities
of F, in particular, F needs not be terminal and Q-factorial. We check the following:
/
/
NON-RIGID QUARTIC 3-FOLDS
13
1. The map ΦZ is an isomorphim in codimension 1 and Z + is terminal. In our examples, ΦZ is
the composition of finitely many elementary maps
Z = Z0
ϕ0
99K Z1
ϕ1
99K · · ·
ϕn
99K Zn+1 = Z +
ϕi
that are isomorphisms or antiflips, flops and flips (in that order).
99K Zi+1 is K-
nonpositive (e.g. a flip or flop) and Zi is terminal and Q-factorial, then so is Zi+1. We need
to check directly that antiflips preserve the terminal condition; we do this by identifying the
antiflips as inverses of flips appearing in [Bro99].
If Zi
2. The restriction of F + → P+ is the contraction of a K-negative extremal ray Z + → X +.
We always denote by P the point (1:0:0:0:0) ∈ P4.
Remark 4.1. We do not give details of how to check that each of our examples is factorial. This
relies on ad hoc methods and the general scheme is as follows. As X ⊂ P is a Picard rank 1
hypersurface, X is (Q-)factorial precisely when the rank of the divisor class group satisfies
rkCl(X) = ρ(X) = rkCl(P).
Since Sing X has codimension 3, we have an isomorphism
Cl(X) ≃ Cl(X r Sing(X)).
Let π : eP → P be a map from a smooth variety eP that restricts to a resolution eX → X with
exceptional locus EX . We have natural isomorphisms
and similarly
Cl(X) ≃ Cl(X r Sing(X)) ≃ Pic(X r Sing X) ≃ Pic(eX r EX)
Cl(P) ≃ Pic(eP r Exc π).
Now, X is factorial precisely when Pic(eP r Exc π) ≃ Pic(eX r E eX). As the classical Grothendieck-
Lefschetz theorem guarantees that Pic(eX) ≃ Pic(eP), the result follows by comparison of the
kernels of the surjective maps
These kernels are isomorphic to the free abelian groups on irreducible divisorial components of
Exc π and of EX respectively, and can be worked out in each case.
r1 : Pic(eP) → Pic(eP r Exc π) and r2 : Pic(eX) → Pic(eX r EX).
Note that we have 2-ray configuration (7), and therefore all varieties in (7) are Q-factorial if
and only if one of them is. These varieties are complete intersections in P, F, F + and P+ and
their Picard ranks are 1, 2, 2 and 1 by construction, and the method above can be applied to
determine the divisor class group of any of them. In some cases, it can be easier to determine
Q-factoriality of another variety in (7) than X (one needs to keep track of Gorenstein indices).
4.1. A family of examples. In this section, we study some links initiated by divisorial contrac-
tions with discrepancy 1. We consider the family of quartic hypersurfaces:
X i,j
4 = {(x0x1 − x2
2 = 0} ⊂ P4,
where (i, j) satisfy 3 ≤ i + j ≤ 4 and (i, j) 6= (4, 0). Then (P ∈ X i,j) is a cAn point with:
3)2 − (x0x2 − x2
4)2 + x4−i−j
4) + x4
1 + x4
0
(xi
1xj
3 + xi
2xj
(i, j)
(0, 4)
(1, 3)
(2, 2)
(3, 1)
(0, 3)
(1, 2)
(2, 1)
(3, 0)
n
3
4
5
6
2
3
4
5
Table 1.
14
HAMID AHMADINEZHAD AND ANNE-SOPHIE KALOGHIROS
Indeed, the restriction of X i,j to the affine chart U0 = {x0 = 1} is
{F (x, y, z, t) = (x − z2)2 − (y − t2)2 + xizj + yitj + x4 + y4 = 0} ⊂ C4,
and the singularity (F = 0) is equivalent to (G = 0), where G defines a cAn singularity. To see
this, let ϕ = (ϕ1, ϕ2, ϕ3, ϕ4) ∈ Aut C[[x, y, z, t]] be defined by:
ϕ1(x, y, z, t) = x + y − (z2 + t2)
ϕ2(x, y, z, t) = x − y − (z2 − t2)
ϕ3(x, y, z, t) = z
ϕ4(x, y, z, t) = t
and check that F (x, y, z, t) = G(ϕ1, ϕ2, ϕ3, ϕ4), where
(8)
where n is as in Table 1, and G′(x, y, z, t) is a polynomial of degree strictly greater than 1 with
respect to the weights
G(x, y, z, t) = xy + zn+1 + tn+1 + G′(x, y, z, t),
w = (1/2, 1/2, 1/n + 1, 1/n + 1).
Since G is a semi quasi-homogeneous polynomial of degree 1 with respect to w, and since no
element of its Jacobian algebra has degree strictly greater than 1, by [AGZV85, I, Section 12],
G ∼ xy + zn+1 + tn+1 and (P ∈ X) is a cAn point. The quartic hypersurfaces X i,j are terminal
(Sing X i,j = {P }) and factorial, and hence are Mori fibre spaces.
Remark 4.2. Taking (i, j) = (4, 0) gives a terminal quartic hypersurface with a cA7 point
but X = {f = 0} is not factorial as f = q1q′
1 + q2q′
X = X 4,0 = {(x0x1 − x2
3)2 − (x0x2 − x2
4)2 + x4
2, where qi, q′
2 = 0} ⊂ P4,
1 + x4
i are quadric polynomials.
Notation 4.3. We embed X i,j as a complete intersection in a scroll whose coordinates are those of
P4 on the one hand, and projectivisations of the (non-linear) components of ϕ ∈ Aut C[[x, y, z, t]],
the automorphism we used to transform the equation of X ∩ U0 into G. Here, ϕ3(x, y, z, t) = z
and ϕ4(x, y, z, t) = t, so we only need to introduce the coordinates:
By construction, X is the complete intersection:
0ϕ1( x1
x0
0ϕ2( x1
x0
, x2
x0
, x2
x0
, x3
x0
, x3
x0
, x4
x0
, x4
x0
) = x0(x1 + x2) − (x2
)) = x0(x1 − x2) − (x2
3 + x2
4)
3 − x2
4)
.
α + β = x0x1 − x2
3
α − β = x0x2 − x2
4
αβ + x4−i−j
1xj
3 + xi
(xi
0
2xj
4) + x4
1 + x4
2 = 0
⊂ P(15, 22)
β = x2
(α = x2
X =
We set x0 = 1 to study X in the neighbourhood of P , and we use the first two equations to
eliminate x1, x2, so that X ∩ {x0 = 1} is the hypersurface:
{αβ + xn+1
3 + xn+1
4 + (higher order terms) = 0} ⊂ C4
x3,x4,α,β
We now construct Sarkisov links initiated by divisorial contractions f : Z → X that are restric-
tions of weighted blowups F : F → P(15, 22) with centre at P . We assume that the local analytic
coordinates for which the germ of f has the description given in Theorem 3.13 are (α, β, x3, x4).
We use the notation of [Ahm15, § 3.1]; F is the Picard rank 2 toric variety TV(I, A), where
I = (u, x0) ∩ (x1, . . . , x4, α, β)
NON-RIGID QUARTIC 3-FOLDS
15
is the irrelevant ideal in the the coordinates ring C[u, x0, . . . , x4, α, β] and for suitable nonzero
integers r1, r2, w1, w2, the 2 × 8 matrix A below (the numerical rows) defines the action of C∗ × C∗
with weights
(9)
A =
x2
x1
u x0
1
0
β
0 −w1 −w2 −a −1 −r1 −r2
1
x3
x4
α
1
1
1
1
2
2 .
For example (µ, λ) ∈ C∗ × C∗ acts on the variable α by
With the grading defined in (9), taking the ample model of a divisor whose class is in(cid:18) 0
k (cid:19)
(cid:0)(µ, λ), α(cid:1) 7→ µ−r1λ2α.
H 0(F, OF(cid:18) 0
k (cid:19))
F → ProjMk∈N
is the morphism given by:
(u, x0, x1, x2, x3, x4, α, β) 7→ (x0, uω1x1, uω2x2, uax3, ux4, ur1α, ur2 β).
This is precisely the weighted blowup F : F → P(15, 22) we are after.
In what follows, we always denote by L the pullback of OP(1) -- so that L ∈(cid:18) 0
E =(cid:18) 1
0 (cid:19) the F -exceptional divisor. L
The form of the expression (8) imposes that the discrepancy of f is 1. We have −KZ =
f ∗(−KX ) − E, where E = Exc f , so that a = 1 and r1 + r2 = n + 1, where (n, (i, j)) are as in
Table 1. Set r1 = r, r2 = n + 1 − r, and assume as we may that r ≤ n + 1 − r. We have:
1 (cid:19) -- and by
KF ∈(cid:18) (n + 1) + w1 + w2 + 1
−9
(cid:19) .
Lemma 4.4. The weighted blowup F : F → P restricts to a divisorial contraction f : Z → X with
discrepancy 1 if the weights r, w1, w2 of F in (9) are one of:
1. i = 0 (n = 2 or 3) and w1 = w2 = 1, r = 1 or 2,
2. w1 = w2 = 2 and r ≥ 2 (n ≥ 3).
Proof. The 3-fold Z is a general complete intersection of 3 hypersurfaces of degrees determined
by r, w1 and w2. Once these degrees are known, we use adjunction to write the anticanonical
class of Z. Since −KX ∈ O(1) and a = 1, −KZ ∼ L − E and this yields the possible values for
r, w1 and w2. For example, if w1, w2, r ≥ 2, Z is the proper transform of X under F and it is a
complete intersection:
Z =(cid:18) −2
ur−2α = x0(uw1−2x1 + uw2−2x2) − (x2
un−1−rβ = x0(uw1−2x1 − uw2−2x2) − (x2
αβ + uiw1+j−2xi
3 + uiw2+j−2xi
2xj
1xj
3 + x2
4)
3 − x2
4)
4 + u4w1−n−1x4
1 + u4w2−n−1x4
2 = 0
so that
2 (cid:19) ∩(cid:18) −2
2 (cid:19) ∩(cid:18) −(n + 1)
4
(cid:19) and − KZ ∈(cid:18) 3 − (w1 + w2)
1
and this forces w1 = w2 = 2. Other cases are entirely similar.
,
(cid:19) ,
(cid:3)
16
HAMID AHMADINEZHAD AND ANNE-SOPHIE KALOGHIROS
We check that, with one exception labelled "bad link", for all weights in Lemma 4.4, the 2-ray
configuration on F induces a 2-ray configuration on T V (I, A) that induces a Sarkisov link for
X i,j. In the case of the bad link, the second birational contraction g : Z 99K Y has relatively
trivial canonical class, so that Y is not terminal and the 2-ray configuration is not a Sarkisov
link. Table 2 gives details of the construction of each Sarkisov link.
Theorem 4.5. There are examples of non-rigid terminal factorial quartic hypersurfaces in P4
with an isolated cAn point for all 2 ≤ n ≤ 6. For each combination(cid:0)(i, j), n(cid:1) in Table 1, X i,j ⊂ P4
is a non-rigid terminal factorial quartic 3-fold with an isolated singular point (P ∈ X) of type
cAn. Table 2 lists Sarkisov links initiated by a divisorial contraction f : Z → X i,j with centre at
(P ∈ X) and discrepancy 1. Each entry specifies the weights of (α, β, x3, x4) for the germ of f in
the notation of Theorem 3.13, and gives the explicit construction of the link.
p ∈ X blowup weights of f
decomposition of ΦZ
Y/T
cA2
cA3
cA4
cA5
cA6
(2, 1, 1, 1)
(3, 1, 1, 1) for X 1,2
(3, 1, 1, 1) for X 0,4
(2, 2, 1, 1)
(3, 2, 1, 1)
(4, 2, 1, 1)
(3, 3, 1, 1)
(5, 2, 1, 1)
(4, 3, 1, 1)
12 flops
8 flops
4 flops
2 flops then flip (3, 1, 1, −1, −1; 2)
Y3,4 ⊂ P(1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2)
(⋆)
X 1,2
bad link
dP2 fibration over P1
dP3 fibration over P1
2 flops
conic bundle over P(1, 1, 2)
Congthen 2 flips (3, 1, 1, −1, −1; 2)
2 flops
dP4 fibration over P1
Y6,6 ⊂ P(1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 5)
Congthen flip (3, 1, 1, −1, −1; 2)
conic bundle over P(1, 1, 2)
Table 2.
Proof. Each case is treated individually. To illustrate the computations involved, we treat the
cA6 case in detail. We then say a few words about the cA2 case, where we recover the example
of a non-rigid quartic constructed in [CM04].
Remark 4.6. The case labelled as (⋆) in Table 2 is a quadratic involution in the language of
[CPR00]. In particular, the link does not produce a new Mori fibre space; it is just a birational
selfmap of X 1,2 that is not an isomorphism.
Non-rigid quartic with a cA6 singular point. Consider the terminal, factorial quartic hy-
persurface:
X = {(x0x1 − x2
3)2 − (x0x2 − x2
4)2 + x3
1x3 + x3
2x4 + x4
1 + x4
2 = 0} ⊂ P4.
As above, we embed X as a complete intersection in P = P(15, 22), where the variables of weight
2 are α, β:
α + β = x0x1 − x2
3
α − β = x0x2 − x2
4
αβ + x3
1x3 + x3
2x4 + x4
1 + x4
2 = 0.
⊂ P(15, 22)
We construct Sarkisov links initiated by a divisorial contraction f : Z → X, which is the restric-
tion of a weighted blowup F : F → P. We assume that the weights assigned to the variables
(α, β, x3, x4) are those in Theorem 3.13. By Theorem 3.13 and Lemma 4.4, F is the Picard rank
2 toric variety T V (I, A), where A is of the form
X =
u x0 x1
1
0
1
x2
x3
x4
α
β
0 −2 −2 −1 −1 −r −(7 − r)
1
1
1
2
1
2
, for r = 2 or 3,
and Z is a complete intersection of the form (2L − 2E, 2L − 2E, 4L − 7E) in F.
Case 1. The germ of f is a blowup with weights (5, 2, 1, 1).
NON-RIGID QUARTIC 3-FOLDS
17
We re-order the coordinates of P and write the action A as follows:
In this case, Z is the complete intersection:
x4
u x0 x3
1
0
α
0 −1 −1 −2 −2 −2 −5
1
x1
x2
β
1
2
1
1
1
u3α + β = x0x1 − x2
3
u3α − β = x0x2 − x2
4
αβ + x3
1x3 + x3
2x4 + x4
1 + x4
2 = 0
2 .
⊂ F.
Z =
Taking the difference of the first two equations shows that the variable β is redundant and:
Z =(u3α = x0(x1 + x2) − (x2
α(x0(x1 − x2) − (x2
3 + x2
4)
4)) + x3
1x3 + x3
where we now denote by F the toric variety T V (I, A), for
3 − x2
2x4 + u(x4
1 + x4
2) = 0
⊂ F,
The 2-ray configuration on F is:
A =
F
P
x4
u x0 x3
1
0
α
0 −1 −1 −2 −2 −5
1
x1
x2
1
1
1
1
2 .
Φ
/❴❴❴❴❴❴
F
F +
!❈❈❈❈❈❈❈❈
G
P+
where Φ is a small map that is the ample model for L − (1 + ε)E and G : F + → P+ is a divisorial
contraction, where P+ ≃ Proj(F, n(L − 2E)) for suitable n >> 1.
The only pure monomials in u, x0, x3, x4 in the equation of Z are in the expression x2
the first equation, so that the restriction of Φ1 to Z is a flop in 2 lines (a copy of P1
of the two points {x2
restrict to a divisorial contraction.
4 in
u,x0 above each
x3,x4), and since α doesn't divide the equations of Z, G does
4 = 0} ⊂ P1
3 + x2
3 + x2
To determine P+, we find a suitable change of basis in which to express the action A.
In
practice, we look for a matrix M in Sl2(Z) such that
The matrix M =(cid:18) 1
3
2 (cid:19) =(cid:18) ∗
0 (cid:19) .
−2 −5 (cid:19) transforms the action A into:
M ·(cid:18) −5
−2 −5 −3 −3 −1 −1 0 ,
x2 α
1
1
x1
1
x3
2
x4
2
x0
3
u
1
so that P+ = P(12, 2, 32, 5), with coordinates x1, x2 (degree 1), uα (degree 2), x3α, x4α (degree 3)
and x0α2 (degree 5). Writing the equations of the proper transform of Z + shows that Y ⊂ P+ is
((uα)3 = (x0α2)(x1 + x2) − ((x3α)2 + (x4α)2)
(x0α2)(x1 − x2) − ((x3α)2 − (x4α)2) + x3
1(x3α) + x3
2(x4α) + (uα)(x4
1 + x4
2) = 0
/
!
The 3-fold Z is the complete intersection:
x4
u x0 x3
1
0
α
0 −1 −1 −3 −2 −2 −4
1
x1
x2
β
1
1
2
1
1
2 .
u2α = x0(x1 + x2) − (x2
uβ = x0(x1 − x2) − (x2
αβ + x3
2x4 + u(x4
1x3 + x3
3 + x2
4)
3 − x2
4)
1 + x4
2) = 0
⊂ F.
Z =
The 2-ray configuration on F is:
F1
Φ2
/❴❴❴❴❴❴
F2
Φ1
/❴❴❴❴❴❴
F
F
P
G
!❇❇❇❇❇❇❇
P+
where Φ1 is a small map and F1 the ample model of L − (1 + ε)E, Φ2 is a small map and F2 the
ample model of 2L − (3 + ε)E, and G is a divisorial contraction to P+ ≃ Proj(F, n(L − 2E)) for
suitable n >> 1.
Since x2
3, x2
4 appear in two of the equations defining Z, Z does not contain any curve contracted
by Φ1 and Φ1Z is an isomorphism. We still denote by Z its image under Φ1.
We show that Φ2Z is a flip. We study the behaviour of Z near Pβ = (0:0:0:0:1:0:0:0). The
restriction of Z to Uβ = {β = 1} is a hypersurface: we may use the second and third equation to
eliminate u and α, so that Z ∩ Uβ is the hypersurface defined by the first equation. As above,
under the change of coordinates associated to
18
HAMID AHMADINEZHAD AND ANNE-SOPHIE KALOGHIROS
so that Y is the complete intersection of two hypersurfaces of degree 6 in P+. Since x3α is a
section of g∗OP+(3), the 3-fold Y has Fano index 3, and by construction of f , its basket consists
of a single [5, 2] singular point at Pα; Y is the Fano variety number 41920 in [GRD].
Case 2. The germ of f is a blowup with weights (4, 3, 1, 1).
We re-order the coordinates of P, and write the action A:
the action becomes:
(cid:18) 1 1
2 3 (cid:19) ∈ SL2(Z),
u x0 x3 x4
1
2
1
3
0
1
β
x2
x1
α
0 −1 −1 −1 −2
1
0 −1 −1 −2 ,
so that once the variables u, α and the second and third equations defining Z have been eliminated,
we are left with a flip of the hypersurface defined by the first equation of Z in Cx0,x3,x4,x1,x2, which
is
x0(x1 + x2) + x2
3 + x2
4 + · · · = 0,
that is, in the notation of [Bro99], of the form (3, 1, 1, −1, −1; 2). There are thus 2 flipped curves,
and while Z has a cA/3 singularity over Pβ, Z2 is Gorenstein over Pβ. The map G is a fibration
over P(α, x1, x2) = P(1, 1, 2), and the equations of Z show that the restriction Z2 → P(1, 1, 2) is
a conic bundle.
Non-rigid quartic with a cA2 point. Consider the terminal, factorial quartic hypersurface
X = {(x0x1 − x2
3)2 − (x0x2 − x2
4)2 + x0(x3
3 + x3
4) + x4
1 + x4
2 = 0} ⊂ P4.
/
/
!
By Lemma 4.4, after re-ordering the coordinates of P, F can only be the Picard rank 2 toric
NON-RIGID QUARTIC 3-FOLDS
19
variety T V (I, A), where
and Z is given by the equations:
x1
u x0 α
1
0
β
0 −1 −1 −1 −1 −1 −2
1
x2
x4
x3
1
1
1
1
2
2 ,
α = x0(x1 + x2) − u(x2
uβ = x0(x1 − x2) − u(x2
4) + u(x4
αβ + x0(x3
3 + x2
4)
3 − x2
4)
1 + x4
2) = 0.
3 + x3
The first equation shows that we may eliminate the variable α. The first step of the 2-ray
configuration of F is a small map but introduces a new divisor on Z, hence is not a step in the
2-ray game of Z. Note that the second equation is in the ideal (u, x0), we will re-embed Z by
unprojection into a toric variety of Picard rank 2 whose 2-ray configuration restricts to suitable
maps on Z. To do so, we introduce an unprojection variable s and replace the second equation
with:
(sx0 = β + x2
su = x1 − x2
3 − x2
4
From the two equations that define s, we eliminate the variable β and x1 so that the (isomorphic)
image of Z under the unprojection is:
{(cid:0)x0(2x1 − su) − u(x2
3 + x2
4)(cid:1)(sx0 − x2
3 + x2
4) + x0(x3
3 + x3
1 + (x1 − su)4) = 0}
4) + u(x4
u x0 x1
1
0
1
x4
x3
s
0 −1 −1 −1 −2
1
1
1
1 ,
⊂
Again, we see that the equation defining Z is in the ideal (u, x0). If we denote by f, g (non-unique)
polynomials such that Z = {x0f + ug = 0}, so that we have
f = x3
3 + x3
4 + · · · and g = x4
1 + (us)4 + · · · ,
and introduce a second unprojection variable
g
x0
then we see that Z is the complete intersection
t =
f
u
=
∈(cid:18) −4
3 (cid:19) ,
The 2-ray configuration of F is
x3
u x0 x1
1
0
s
0 −1 −1 −1 −4 −2
1
x4
1
1
3
1
t
1 .
(tu = f
tx0 = g
⊂ F =
F
F
P
Φ
/❴❴❴❴❴❴
F +
!❈❈❈❈❈❈❈❈
G
P+
where Φ is a small map and F + the ample model of L − (1 + ε)E and G is a divisorial contraction.
The restriction ΦZ : Z 99K Z + is a flop in 12 lines that are copies of P1
u,x0 lying over the 12 points
{x4
1 + x4
3 − x4
4 = x3
2 + x3
3 + · · · = 0} ⊂ Px1,x3,x4.
/
!
u x0 x1 x3 x4
1
1
s
0 −1 −1
1
0
1
0
1
2
t
0 ,
⊂ P+,
1
2
Y =(x4
1 + · · · = 0
x3
2 + x3
3 + · · · = 0
20
HAMID AHMADINEZHAD AND ANNE-SOPHIE KALOGHIROS
Since Z 6⊂ {s = 0}, the restriction GZ + : Z + → Y is a divisorial contraction. As above, applying
the coordinate change for the action associated to
(cid:18) 1 1
1 2 (cid:19) ∈ SL2(Z)
transforms A into
and we see that P+ = P(14, 22), with coordinates su, x1, x3, x4 (degree 1), sx0, st (degree 2). The
proper transform of Z is
i.e. Y is the complete intersection of a cubic and a quartic hypersurface in P+, a Fano 3-fold
of codimension 2 and genus 2. The map Z + → Y is a Kawamata blowup of one of the two
1/2(1, 1, 1) points on Y . This link is constructed in [CM04].
(cid:3)
Remark 4.7. In several cases, one or both of the variables α, β are redundant. This means that
f : Z → X is the restriction of a weighted blowup of some P′ with P4 ⊂ P′ ⊂ P: the construction
could have been obtained with a "smaller embedding". For example, this is the case in our
treatment of a terminal factorial quartic hypersurface with a cA2 point:
[CM04] construct the
same link without introducing α, β. In a given example, it is usually clear how many (if any)
variables need to be introduced. We have chosen to always introduce two variables (and then
eliminate redundant ones) in order to present our results in a unified way.
Remark 4.8. It is crucial to understand that we make no claim about the existence of Sarkisov
links initiated by divisorial contractions f : Z → X whose germs have weights different from those
in Lemma 4.4, where X is one of the hypersurfaces X i,j. Such divisorial contractions may occur,
but they are not restrictions of weighted blowups of P = P(15, 22). We expect that in some cases,
one may construct such contractions by considering a different embedding of X ⊂ P′ and looking
at restrictions of weighted blowups of P′. For instance, we do not know wether X 3,1 admits a
Sarkisov link initiated by a divisorial contraction whose germ is a weighted blowup (6, 1, 1, 1).
4.2. Other examples with cA singularities. In this section, we use similar techniques to give
an example of a non-rigid terminal factorial quartic hypersurface with a cA7 singular point. These
can also be used to construct Sarkisov links initiated by divisorial contractions with discrepancy
a > 1 and centre at a cAn point for n ≥ 2, where the possible values a, n are determined in
Proposition 3.9. We give an example with n = 2 and a = 2.
Example 4.9. Let X be the hypersurface:
X = {(x0x1 − x2
3)2 − (x0x2 − x2
4)2 + x0x3
1 − x2
1x2
3 + x4
1 + x4
2 = 0} ⊂ P4.
The restriction of X to the affine chart U0 = {x0 = 1} is
F (x, y, z, t) = (x − z2)2 − (y − t2)2 + x3 − x2z2 + x4 + y4
NON-RIGID QUARTIC 3-FOLDS
21
and the singularity (F = 0) is equivalent to (G = 0), where G defines a cA7 singularity. To see
this, let ϕ = (ϕ1, ϕ2, ϕ3, ϕ4) ∈ Aut C[[x, y, z, t]], where
ϕ1(x, y, z, t) = x + y − (z2(1 − 1
ϕ2(x, y, z, t) = x − y − (z2(1 − 1
ϕ3(x, y, z, t) = z,
ϕ4(x, y, z, t) = t
2 z2) + t2)
2 z2) − t2)
and check that F (x, y, z, t) = G(ϕ1, ϕ2, ϕ3, ϕ4), where
(10)
where G′(x, y, z, t) is a polynomial of degree strictly greater than 1 with respect to the weights
G(x, y, z, t) = xy + z8 + t8 + G′(x, y, z, t),
w = (1/2, 1/2, 1/8, 1/8).
Since G is a semi quasi-homogeneous polynomial of degree 1 with respect to w, and since no
element of its Jacobian algebra has degree strictly greater than 1 with respect to these weights,
G ∼ xy + z8 + t8
and (P ∈ X) is a cA7 point. The hypersurface X ⊂ P4 is a terminal and factorial quartic
hypersurface, and hence is a Mori fibre space.
As in Section 4.1, we embed X as the complete intersection
α = x0(x1 + x2) − (x2
β = x0(x1 − x2) − (x2
1(α + β) + x4
αβ + 2x2
3 + x2
4)
3 − x2
4)
1 + x4
2 = 0
⊂ P = P(14, 22).
We consider the weighted blowup F : F → P, where F is the Picard rank 2 toric variety T V (I, A),
where I = (u, x0) ∩ (x1, · · · , x4, α, β) is the irrelevant ideal and A is the action of C∗ × C∗ with
weights:
u x0 x3
1
0
The proper transform of X is
1
x4
x1
β
0 −1 −1 −2 −2 −4 −4
1
x2
1
1
1
2
α
2
2 (cid:19) ∩(cid:18) 2
2 (cid:19) ∩(cid:18) 8
4 (cid:19) ⊂ F
u2α = x0(x1 + x2) − (x2
u2β = x0(x1 − x2) − (x2
αβ + 2x2
1(α + β) + x4
3 + x2
4)
3 − x2
4)
2 = 0
1 + x4
=(cid:18) 2
Z =
and we check that the restriction of F to Z is indeed a divisorial contraction f : Z → X with
discrepancy a = 1. The 2-ray configuration on F is:
Φ
/❴❴❴❴❴❴
F
F
P
F +
!❈❈❈❈❈❈❈❈
G
P+
where Φ is a small map and F + is the ample model of L − (1 + ε)E and G is a fibration morphism
and P+ = P(1, 1, 2, 2) = Px1,x2,α,β is the ample model Proj(n(L − 2E)) for suitable n >> 1.
The restriction of Φ to Z is an isomorphism because the monomials x2
4 appear in the first
two equations, we still denote by Z its image. The restriction of G to Z is a conic bundle over
the quartic surface S4 ⊂ P(1, 1, 2, 2) defined by the third equation of Z.
3, x2
/
!
22
HAMID AHMADINEZHAD AND ANNE-SOPHIE KALOGHIROS
The results of Section 4.1 and Example 4.9 thus show:
Theorem 4.10. There are examples of non-rigid terminal factorial quartic hypersurfaces with a
singular point of type cAn for all possible n ≥ 2.
Each of the Sarkisov links we have constructed so far is initiated by a divisorial contraction
with centre at a cAn point and discrepancy a = 1. We now construct an example with higher
discrepancy.
Example 4.11. We construct a Sarkisov link initiated by a divisorial contraction with centre at
a cA2 point. Unlike the previous examples, which only involved flips and flops, the Sarkisov link
in this example involves an antiflip.
Consider the terminal, factorial quartic hypersurface
2 + x3
X = {x0x1(x0x2 − x2
4) + x0(x3
3) − x4
1 + x4
2 + x4
3} ⊂ P4.
Then Sing X = {P, P4}, and, setting x0 = 1 in the expression above, we see that:
(P ∈ X) ∼ 0 ∈ {xy + z3 + t6 + (higher order terms) = 0},
so that P is a cA2 point and a divisorial contraction with centre at (P ∈ X) has discrepancy 1
or 2 by Theorem 3.13. We embed X as
α = x0x1
β = x0x2 − x2
4
3) − x4
2 + x3
αβx0(x3
1 + x4
2 + x4
3 = 0
⊂ P(15, 22).
X =
If we consider a divisorial contraction with discrepancy 1, we obtain a link of the same form
as above. We now consider the case when f is a divisorial contraction with discrepancy 2. Then,
by Theorem 3.13, the weights of (α, β, x3, x4) are either (1, 5, 2, 1) or (3, 3, 2, 1). We consider the
second case, and as in Lemma 4.4, we show that F is a toric variety T V (I, A), where
A =
x2
u x0 x1
1
0
β
0 −p −q −2 −1 −3 −3
1
x4
x3
α
1
1
1
1
2
2 , for (p, q) = (2, 2), (2, 3) or (3, 2).
We consider the case when (p, q) = (2, 2), so that, after re-ordering,
and the proper transform of X is given by the equations:
α
u x0 x4
1
0
x3
0 −1 −3 −3 −2 −2 −2
1
x1
x2
β
2
2
1
1
1
uα = x0x1
uβ = x0x2 − x2
4
αβx0(x3
2 + x3
3) + u2(−x4
1 + x4
2 + x2
4) = 0
1 ,
.
A =
(su = x1
sx0 = α
,
s ∈(cid:18) −3
1 (cid:19) .
As in the proof of the cA2 case in Theorem 4.5, the first equation is in the ideal (u, x0), we
re-embed Z so that it follows the ambient 2-ray configuration: we introduce an unprojection
variable s such that:
NON-RIGID QUARTIC 3-FOLDS
23
We then see that the variables x1 and α are redundant so that the expression of Z is
(uβ = x0x2 − x2
x0(sβ + x3
4
3 + x3
2) + u2((su)4 + x4
2 + x4
3) = 0.
As above, since the second equation is in the ideal (u2, x0), we need to introduce a second
unprojection variable η such that
3 + x3
2
ηx0 = (su)4 + x4
2 + x4
3
,
η ∈(cid:18) −8
3 (cid:19) .
We now get that Z is the complete intersection
(ηu2 = sβ + x3
A =
uβ = x0x2 − x2
4
3 + x3
ηu2 = sβ + x3
2
ηx0 = (su)4 + x4
2 + x4
3
⊂ F,
β
u x0 x4
1
0
s
0 −1 −3 −2 −2 −8 −3
1
x2
x3
1
1
2
1
η
3
1 .
where F denotes the toric variety T V (I, A), for
The 2-ray configuration on F is:
F1
Φ2
/❴❴❴❴❴❴
F2
Φ3
/❴❴❴❴❴❴
F3
Φ1
/❴❴❴❴❴❴
F
F
P
,
G
!❇❇❇❇❇❇❇
P+
- Φ1 : F 99K F1 is a small map, and F1 is the ample model of L − (1 + ε)E,
- Φ2 : F1 99K F2 is a small map, and F2 is the ample model of 2L − (3 + ε)E,
- Φ3 : F2 99K F3 is a small map, where F3 is the ample model of L − (2 + ε)E,
- G : F3 → P+ is a divisorial contraction, and P+ is the ample model of 8L − 3E.
We study the restriction of this 2-ray configuration to Z. Since the monomial x2
4 appears in
one of the equations of Z, the restriction Φ1Z is an isomorphism. We still denote by Z its image.
We now prove that Φ2Z : Z 99K Z2 is a small birational map. Since it is a K-positive contrac-
tion, we also need to prove that Z2 has terminal singularities. The exceptional locus of Φ2Z is
at most 1-dimensional, as the only pure monomial in u, x0, x4 that appears in the equations of
4.The exceptional locus of (Φ2Z)−1 is also at most 1-dimensional, as pure monomials in
Z is x2
x2, x3, η, s appear in two of the three equations defining Z.
In order to study Φ2Z , we localise near Pβ. Setting β = 1, we use the first two equations to
eliminate the variables u and s, so that X ∩ {β = 1} is the hypersurface defined by the third
equation:
{ηx0 = x4
2 + x2
3 + (ηu2 − x3
3 − x3
2)4(x0x2 − x2
4)4 = 0}
As above, under the change of coordinates associated to
(cid:18) 1 −1
3 (cid:19) ∈ SL2(Z),
−2
/
/
/
!
24
HAMID AHMADINEZHAD AND ANNE-SOPHIE KALOGHIROS
the action becomes:
x0 x4 β x2
1
1
u
−1 −1
2
3
x3
1
0 −1 −1 −7 −3 ,
η
5
s
2
0
1
so that once the variables u, s and the second and third equations defining Z have been eliminated,
we are left with the inverse of a flip of the hypersurface defined by the first equation of Z in
Cη,x2,x3,x0,x4, which is, in the notation of [Bro99], of the form (7, 1, 1, −3, −1; 4). The map Φ2Z
is thus an antiflip between 3-folds with terminal singularities. The exceptional locus of Φ2Z is
empty because the equation of X ∩ Uβ has no pure monomial in x0, x4; the exceptional locus of
(Φ2Z)−1 consists of 4 lines
{x4
2 + x4
3 = 0} ⊂ P(1, 1, 7) = Px2,x3,η.
By the construction of f , the basket of Z consists of two [3, 1] singularities, one of which lies over
Pβ. From [Bro99], the basket of Z2 consists of one [7, 1] singular point and one [3, 1] singular
point.
The restriction Φ3Z2 is an isomorphism because x3
3 +x3
2 appears in the second equation defining
Z and x4
3 + x4
2 in the third. We still denote Z2 its image by Φ3Z2.
The restriction of G to Z2 is a morphism because Z2 ∩ {s = 0} is a prime divisor. As above,
under the change of coordinates associated to
the action becomes:
(cid:18) 1 −2
3 (cid:19) ∈ SL2(Z),
−1
x0
x4
β
u
−1 −2 −1 −1
1
3
2
3
x2 x3 η s
0
2 1
1
0
1
1 0 ,
(s3u)(s7β) = (s8x0)(s2x2) − (s5x4)2
s7β = (s3u)2η − (s2x3)3 − (s2x2)3
(s8x0)η = (s3u)4 + (s2x2)4 + (s2x3)4
⊂ P+,
Y =
so that P+ = P(14, 2, 32) with coordinates η, s3u, s2x2, s2x3 (degree 1), s5x4 (degree 2) and
s7β, s8x0 (degree 3).
The proper transform of Z is
so that the variable s7β and the second equations are redundant. The 3-fold Y is a complete
intersection of two quartic hypersurfaces Y4,4 ⊂ P(14, 2, 3). This is a Fano 3-fold of index 1, and
is the Fano variety number 16204 in [GRD].
Setting η = 1 shows that Y4,4 ⊂ P+ as a singular point of type cE7 at Pη, and the contraction
g : Z2 → Y is a divisorial contraction with centre at Pη. The contraction g has discrepancy 2,
and the basket of Z2 shows that g is, in Kawakita's notation [Kaw03], a contraction of type I.
In summary, we have constructed a Sarkisov link from a terminal factorial quartic hypersurface
X with a cA2 point (P ∈ X) to a complete intersection Y4,4 ⊂ P(14, 2, 3) with a cE7 point (Q ∈ Y ),
which is of the form:
Z
Φ
/❴❴❴❴❴❴
Z +
f
X
g
Y4,4
- f is a discrepancy 2 divisorial contraction with centre at P ,
- ϕ = ϕ3 ◦ ϕ2 ◦ ϕ1, with ϕ1, ϕ3 isomorphisms and ϕ2 an antiflip,
- g is a discrepancy 2 divisorial contraction with centre at Q.
/
NON-RIGID QUARTIC 3-FOLDS
25
4.3. Examples with cD and cE singularities. We now give examples of non-rigid factorial
quartic hypersurfaces with singular points that are not of type cA. The study of the pliability of
quartics with cDm and cE6,7,8 singular points is complicated by the fact that, unlike in the cAn
case, there is no classification of the germs of divisorial extractions f : Z → X with centre at a cD
or cE point. We only know the germs of a few explicit divisorial extractions with these centers:
those that are weighted blowups with discrepancy 1. The following examples are non-rigid quartic
hypersurfaces with a cD or cE singular point.
Example 4.12. Let
X = {x2
0x2
1 − x0(x3
2 + x3
3 + x3
4) + f4(x1, x2, x3, x4) = 0} ⊂ P4
3 + x3
2 + x3
be a quartic hypersurface, where f4 is a general homogeneous polynomial of degree 4 such that
4 = f4(0, x2, x3, x4) = 0} ⊂ P2 consists of 12 points. By generality of f4, X is
{x3
factorial and Sing X consists of a single point (1:0:0:0:0) that is of type cD4. The restriction of
the weighted blowup F → P with centre at P and weights (2, 1, 1, 1) is a divisorial contraction
with discrepancy 1. It initiates a Sarkisov link that consists of a flop in 12 lines over the 12 points
{x3
2 + x3
3 + x3
4 = f4(0, x2, x3, x4) = 0} ⊂ P2
x2,x3,x4
followed by a divisorial contraction to a 1/2(1, 1, 1) point on a quasismooth intersection of a quartic
and a cubic Y = Y3,4 ⊂ P(14, 22). Note that the Fano 3-fold Y is not a general Y3,4 ⊂ P(14, 22).
Denoting by x1, · · · , x4 the coordinates of weight 1 and by y1, y2 those of weight 2, the equation
of Y is of the form
Y : (y1x1 − (x3
y1y2 − y2
3 + x3
2 + x3
1 − f4(x1, · · · , x4) = 0
4) = 0
⊂ P(14, 22).
Note the similarity of this link to the link between a quartic X ′ ⊂ P4 with a cA2 point and a
general Y3,4 ⊂ P(14, 22) studied in [CM04]. In our case, Y is a special quasi-smooth model in its
family, and we conjecture that as in [CM04] X is birigid, i.e. P(X) = {[X], [Y ]}.
Example 4.13. Let
X = {x2
0x2
1 + x0x2
2x3 + x4
1 + x4
2 + x4
3 + x4
4 = 0} ⊂ P4;
Sing X consists of a single point (1:0:0:0:0) that is of type cD5. The restriction of the weighted
blowup F → P with centre at P and weights (2, 1, 2, 1) is a divisorial contraction with discrepancy
1. It initiates a Sarkisov link that consists of a flop in 4 lines lying above {x4
followed by a del Pezzo fibration of degree 2.
4 = 0} ⊂ P1
2 + x4
x2,x4
Example 4.14. (Singular points of cE type)
In the same way, let
X = {x2
0x2
1 + x0x3
2 + x4
1 + x4
2 + x4
3 + x4
4 = 0} ⊂ P4;
Sing X consists of a single point (1:0:0:0:0) that is of type cE6. The restriction of the weighted
blowup F → P with centre at P and weights (2, 2, 1, 1) is a divisorial contraction with discrepancy
1. It initiates a Sarkisov link that consists of a flop in 4 lines lying above {x4
followed by a del Pezzo fibration of degree 2.
4 = 0} ⊂ P1
3 + x4
x3,x4
Similarly, if
Y = {(x0x1 − x2
4)2 + x0x3
Z = {(x0x1 − x2
3 − x2
4)2 + x0x3
2 + x0x2
2 + x2x3
3 + x4
1 + x4
1(x3 + x4) + x4
2 = 0} ⊂ P4 and
1 + x4
2 = 0} ⊂ P4
then
Sing Y = Sing Z = {P } = (1:0:0:0:0)
2 and
2
26
HAMID AHMADINEZHAD AND ANNE-SOPHIE KALOGHIROS
and (P ∈ Y ) is of local analytic type cE7, while (P ∈ Z) is of local analytic type cE8. The 3-folds
Y and Z are non-rigid. Indeed, embed Y and Z as complete intersections
Y =(α = x0x1 − x2
α2 + x0x3
4
2 + x2x3
3 + x4
1 + x4
2 = 0
⊂ P1 = P(15, 2)
where the variable of degree 2 is α, and
Z =(β = x0x1 − x2
β2 + x0x3
3 − x2
4
2 + x0x2
1(x3 + x4) + x4
1 + x4
2 = 0
⊂ P2 = P(15, 2)
where the variable of degree 2 is β. Then consider the rank 2 toric varieties F1 and F2 associated
to
x2
u x0 x1
1
0
α
0 −2 −2 −2 −1 −3
1
x4
x3
1
1
1
1
x2
u x0 x1
1
0
β
0 −3 −2 −1 −1 −3
1
x3
x4
1
1
1
1
The restrictions of the weighted blowup Fi → Pi with centre at P are divisorial contractions
f1 : eY → Y and f2 : eZ → Z. These both have discrepancy 1, and globalise the germs of weighted
blowups with center at a cE point classified in [Mar96, Theorem 3.2]. Further, f1 initiates a
Sarkisov link between Y and a conic bundle, while f2 initiates a link between Z and an index 2
Fano 3-fold Y4,6 ⊂ P(12, 22, 32) which is the Fano variety number 40369 in [GRD].
References
[AGZV85] V. I. Arnol′d, S. M. Guseın-Zade, and A. N. Varchenko, Singularities of differentiable maps. Vol. I,
Monographs in Mathematics, vol. 82, Birkhauser Boston Inc., Boston, MA, 1985, The classification
of critical points, caustics and wave fronts, Translated from the Russian by Ian Porteous and Mark
Reynolds.
[Ahm12] Hamid Ahmadinezhad, On del Pezzo fibrations that are not birationally rigid, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2)
86 (2012), no. 1, 36 -- 62. MR 2959294
[Ahm15]
, On pliabillity of del Pezzo fibrations and Cox rings, Journal fur die reine und angewandte
Mathematik (Crelle's Journal) (2015), to appear, DOI: 10.1515/crelle-2014-0095.
[BCHM10] C. Birkar, P. Cascini, C. D. Hacon, and J. McKernan, Existence of minimal models for varieties of log
[Bro99]
[CM04]
[Cor95]
general type, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 23 (2010), no. 2, 405 -- 468.
Gavin Brown, Flips arising as quotients of hypersurfaces, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 127
(1999), no. 1, 13 -- 31.
Alessio Corti and Massimiliano Mella, Birational geometry of terminal quartic 3-folds. I, Amer. J. Math.
126 (2004), no. 4, 739 -- 761.
Alessio Corti, Factoring birational maps of threefolds after Sarkisov, J. Algebraic Geom. 4 (1995), no. 2,
223 -- 254.
[GRD]
[HK00]
[HM13]
[CPR00] Alessio Corti, Aleksandr Pukhlikov, and Miles Reid, Fano 3-fold hypersurfaces, Explicit birational
geometry of 3-folds, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., vol. 281, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge,
2000, pp. 175 -- 258.
The graded ring database, http://grdb.lboro.ac.uk/.
Y. Hu and S. Keel, Mori dream spaces and GIT, Michigan Math. J. 48 (2000), 331 -- 348.
Christopher D. Hacon and James McKernan, The Sarkisov program, J. Algebraic Geom. 22 (2013),
no. 2, 389 -- 405.
V. A. Iskovskih and Ju. I. Manin, Three-dimensional quartics and counterexamples to the Luroth prob-
lem, Mat. Sb. (N.S.) 86(128) (1971), 140 -- 166.
V. A. Iskovskikh and Yu. G. Prokhorov, Fano varieties, Algebraic geometry, V, Encyclopaedia Math.
Sci., vol. 47, Springer, Berlin, 1999, pp. 1 -- 247.
Anne-Sophie Kaloghiros, The defect of Fano 3-folds, J. Algebraic Geom. 20 (2011), no. 1, 127 -- 149.
[IM71]
[IP99]
, A classification of terminal quartic 3-folds and applications to rationality questions, Math.
[Kal11]
[Kal12]
Ann. 354 (2012), no. 1, 263 -- 296.
[Kal13]
, Relations in the Sarkisov program, Compos. Math. 149 (2013), no. 10, 1685 -- 1709.
NON-RIGID QUARTIC 3-FOLDS
27
[Kaw01] Masayuki Kawakita, Divisorial contractions in dimension three which contract divisors to smooth points,
Invent. Math. 145 (2001), no. 1, 105 -- 119.
[Kaw02]
, Divisorial contractions in dimension three which contract divisors to compound A1 points,
Compositio Math. 133 (2002), no. 1, 95 -- 116.
[Kaw03]
, General elephants of three-fold divisorial contractions, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 16 (2003), no. 2,
331 -- 362 (electronic).
[Kol98]
[Mel04]
[KM98]
[Mar96]
[Nam97]
[NS95]
[KKL14] Anne-Sophie Kaloghiros, Alex Kuronya, and Vladimir Lazi´c, Finite generation and geography of models,
Minimal models and extremal rays, Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics, Mathematical Society of
Japan, Tokyo (2014), To appear.
J. Koll´ar and S. Mori, Birational geometry of algebraic varieties, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics,
vol. 134, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.
J´anos Koll´ar, Real algebraic threefolds. I. Terminal singularities, Collect. Math. 49 (1998), no. 2-3,
335 -- 360, Dedicated to the memory of Fernando Serrano.
Dimitri Markushevich, Minimal discrepancy for a terminal cDV singularity is 1, J. Math. Sci. Univ.
Tokyo 3 (1996), no. 2, 445 -- 456.
Massimiliano Mella, Birational geometry of quartic 3-folds. II. The importance of being Q-factorial,
Math. Ann. 330 (2004), no. 1, 107 -- 126.
Yoshinori Namikawa, Smoothing Fano 3-folds, J. Algebraic Geom. 6 (1997), no. 2, 307 -- 324.
Yoshinori Namikawa and J. H. M. Steenbrink, Global smoothing of Calabi-Yau threefolds, Invent. Math.
122 (1995), no. 2, 403 -- 419.
Kjell Fredrik Pettersen, On nodal determinantal quartic hypersurfaces in P4, University of Oslo PhD
Thesis, 1998.
Miles Reid, Young person's guide to canonical singularities, Algebraic geometry, Bowdoin, 1985
(Brunswick, Maine, 1985), Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 46, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI,
1987, pp. 345 -- 414.
J. A. Todd, Configurations defined by six lines in space of three dimensions, Mathematical Proceedings
of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 29 (1933), 52 -- 68.
J. A. Todd, A note on two special primals in four dimensions, The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics
os-6 (1935), no. 1, 129 -- 136.
J. A. Todd, On a quartic primal with forty-five nodes, in space of four dimensions, Quart. J. Math. 7
(1936), 169 -- 174.
[Pet98]
[Rei87]
[Tod33]
[Tod35]
[Tod36]
School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TW, UK
E-mail address: [email protected]
Imperial College London, 180 Queen's Gate, London SW7 2AZ, UK
Current address: Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH
E-mail address: [email protected]
|
1507.08489 | 2 | 1507 | 2018-03-05T14:48:01 | Numerical characterisation of quadrics | [
"math.AG"
] | Let X be a Fano manifold such that every rational curve in X has anticanonical degree at least the dimension of X. We prove that X is a projective space or a quadric. | math.AG | math |
NUMERICAL CHARACTERISATION OF QUADRICS
THOMAS DEDIEU AND ANDREAS HÖRING
Abstract. Let X be a Fano manifold such that −KX · C ≥ dim X for every
rational curve C ⊂ X. We prove that X is a projective space or a quadric.
Introduction
Let X be a Fano manifold, i.e. a projective manifold with ample anticanonical
bundle. If the Picard number of X is at least two, Mori theory shows the existence
of at least two non-trivial morphisms ϕi : X → Yi which contain some interesting
information on the geometry of X. On the contrary, when the Picard number equals
one Mori theory does not yield any information, and one is thus led to studying
X in terms of the positivity of the anticanonical bundle. A well-known example of
such a characterisation is the following theorem of Kobayashi -- Ochiai.
A. Theorem [KO73]. Let X be a projective manifold of dimension n. Suppose
that −KX ≃ dH with H an ample line bundle on X.
a) If d = n + 1, then X ≃ Pn.
b) If d = n, then X ≃ Qn.
(Throughout the paper, Qn designates a smooth quadric hypersurface in Pn+1
for any positive integer n.)
The divisibility of −KX in the Picard group is a rather restrictive condition, so it
is natural to ask for similar characterisations under (a priori) weaker assumptions.
Based on Kebekus' study of singular rational curves [Keb02b], Cho, Miyaoka and
Shepherd-Barron proved a generalisation of the first part of Theorem A:
B. Theorem [CMSB02, Keb02a]. Let X be a Fano manifold of dimension n.
Suppose that
−KX · C ≥ n + 1
for all rational curves C ⊂ X.
Then X ≃ Pn.
The aim of this paper is to prove a similar generalisation for the second part of
Theorem A:
C. Theorem. Let X be a Fano manifold of dimension n. Suppose that
−KX · C ≥ n for all rational curves C ⊂ X.
Then X ≃ Pn or X ≃ Qn.
Date: July 28, 2015.
1
This statement already appears in a paper of Miyaoka [Miy04, Thm.0.1], but
the proof there has a gap (cf. Remark 4.2). In this paper we borrow some ideas
and tools from Miyaoka's, yet give a proof based on a completely different strategy.
Note also that Hwang gave a proof under the additional assumption that the general
VMRT (see below) is smooth [Hwa13, Thm.1.11], a property that does not hold for
every Fano manifold [CD15, Thm.1.10].
In the proof of Theorem C, we have to assume n ≥ 4; for n ≤ 3 the statement
follows easily from classification results.
The assumption that X is Fano assures that ρ(X) = 1 because of the Ionescu --
Wiśniewski inequality [Ion86, Thm.0.4], [Wiś91, Thm.1.1] (see §3.1). It is possible
to remove this assumption: the Ionescu -- Wiśniewski inequality together with [HN13,
Thm.1.3] enable one to deal with the case ρ(X) > 1, and one gets the following.
D. Corollary. Let X be a projective manifold of dimension n containing a rational
curve. If
−KX · C ≥ n for all rational curves C ⊂ X,
then X is a projective space, a hyperquadric, or a projective bundle over a curve.
(Note that under the assumptions of Corollary D, if ρ(X) = 1 then X is Fano.)
Outline of the proof. In the situation of Theorem C let K be a family of minimal
rational curves on X. By Mori's bend-and-break lemma a minimal curve [l] ∈ K
satisfies −KX · l ≤ n + 1 and if equality holds then X ≃ Pn by [CMSB02]. By
our assumption we are thus left to deal with the case −KX · l = n. For a general
point x ∈ X the space Kx parametrising curves in K passing through x then has
dimension n − 2 and by [Keb02b, Thm.3.4] there exists a morphism
τx : Kx → P(ΩX,x)
which maps a general curve [l] ∈ Kx to its tangent direction T ⊥
l,x. By [HM04, Thm.1]
this map is birational onto its image Vx, the variety of minimal rational tangents
(VMRT) at x. We denote by V ⊂ P(ΩX ) the total VMRT, i.e. the closure of the
locus covered by the VMRTs Vx for x ∈ X general. For the proof of Theorem C
we will compute the cohomology class of the total VMRT V ⊂ P(ΩX ) in terms of
the tautological class ζ and π∗KX , where π : P(ΩX ) → X is the projection map.
This computation is based on the construction, on the manifold X, of a family W ◦
of smooth rational curves such that for every [C] ∈ W ◦ one has
TX C ≃ OP1(2)⊕n;
it lifts to a family on P(ΩX ) by associating to a curve C ⊂ X the image C of the
morphism C → P(ΩX ) defined by the invertible quotient
The main technical statement of this paper is:
ΩX C → ΩC .
E. Proposition. Let X 6≃ Pn be a Fano manifold of dimension n ≥ 4, and suppose
that
−KX · C ≥ n for all rational curves C ⊂ X.
Then, in the above notation, one has V · C = 0 for all [C] ∈ W0.
2
Once we have shown this statement a similar intersection computation involv-
ing a general minimal rational curve l yields that the VMRT Vx ⊂ P(ΩX,x) is a
hypersurface of degree at most two. We then conclude with some earlier results of
Araujo, Hwang, and Mok [Ara06, Hwa07, Mok08].
Acknowledgements. We thank Stéphane Druel for his numerous comments dur-
ing this project. This work was partially supported by the A.N.R. project CLASS1.
1. Notation and conventions
We work over the field C of complex numbers. Topological notions refer to the
Zariski topology.
We use the modern notation for projective spaces, as
introduced by
if E is a locally free sheaf on a scheme X, we let P(E) be
Grothendieck:
Proj (Sym E). If L is a line in a vector space V , L⊥ designates the corresponding
point in P(V ∨).
A variety is an integral scheme of finite type over C, a manifold is a smooth
variety. A fibration is a proper surjective morphism with connected fibres ϕ : X →
Y such that X and Y are normal and dim X > dim Y > 0.
We will use the standard terminology and results on rational curves, as explained
in [Kol96, Ch.II], [Deb01, Ch.2,3,4], and [Hwa01]. Let X be a variety. We remind
the reader that following [Kol96, II, Def.2.11], the notation RatCurvesn X refers to
the union of the normalisations of those locally closed subsets of the Chow variety
of X parametrising irreducible rational curves (the superscript n is a reminder that
we normalised, and has nothing to do with the dimension).
For technical reasons, we have to consider families of rational curves on X as
living alternately in RatCurvesn X and in Hom(P1, X). Our general policy is to
call HomR ⊂ Hom(P1, X) the family corresponding to R ⊂ RatCurvesn X.
2. Preliminaries on conic bundles
In this section, we establish some basic facts about conic bundles over a curve and
compute some intersection numbers which will turn out to be crucial for the proof
of Proposition E. All these statements appear in one form or another in [Miy04,
§2], but we recall them and their proofs for the clarity of exposition.
2.1. Definition. A conic bundle is an equidimensional projective fibration ϕ :
X → Y such that there exists a rank three vector bundle V → Y and an embedding
X ֒→ P(V ) that maps every ϕ-fibre ϕ−1(y) onto a conic (i.e. the zero scheme of a
degree 2 form) in P(Vy). The set
∆ := {y ∈ Y ϕ−1(y) is not smooth}
is called the discriminant locus of the conic bundle.
2.2. Lemma. Let S be a smooth surface admitting a projective fibration ϕ : S → T
onto a smooth curve such that the general fibre is P1, and such that −KS is ϕ-nef.
Let F be a reducible ϕ-fibre and suppose that
1ANR-10-JCJC-0111
F = C1 + C2 + F ′,
3
where the Ci are (−1)-curves and Ci 6⊂ F ′. Then F ′ = P Ej is a reduced chain of
(−2)-curves and the dual graph of F is as depicted in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
C1
✈
E1
❢
E2
❢
Ek−1 Ek
❢
❢
C2
✈
Proof. Write F ′ = Pk
j=1 ajEj, aj ∈ N, where E1, . . . , Ek are the irreducible com-
ponents of F ′. Note first that since −KS · F = 2 and −KS · Ci = 1, the fact that
−KS is ϕ-nef implies −KS · Ej = 0 for all j. Since Ej is an irreducible component
of a reducible fibre, we have E2
j < 0. Thus we see that each Ej is a (−2)-curve.
We will now proceed by induction on the number of irreducible components of
F ′, the case F ′ = 0 being trivial. Let µ : S → S′ be the blow-down of the (−1)-
curve C2; then by the rigidity lemma [Deb01, Lemma 1.15], there is a morphism
ϕ′ : S′ → T such that ϕ = ϕ′ ◦ µ. Note that S′ is smooth and −KS ′ is ϕ′-nef (see,
e.g., [CH14, Rem.5.7]). We also have
0 = C2 · F = −1 + C2 · (C1 +
k
X
i=1
aiEi),
i=1 aiEi transversally in exactly one point.
so C2 meets C1 + Pk
If C2 · C1 > 0,
then µ∗(C1) has self-intersection 0, yet it is also an irreducible component of the
reducible fibre µ∗(C1 + Pk
i=1 aiEi), a contradiction. Thus (up to renumbering) we
can suppose that C2 · E1 = 1 and a1 = 1. In particular µ∗(E1) is a (−1)-curve, so
µ∗(C1 +
k
X
i=1
aiEi) = µ∗(C1) + µ∗(E1) + µ∗(
X
aiEi)
k
i=2
satisfies the induction hypothesis.
(cid:3)
In the following we will use that for every normal surface one can define an
intersection theory using the Mumford pull-back to the minimal resolution, cf.
[Sak84].
2.3. Lemma. Let S be a normal surface admitting a projective fibration ϕ : S → T
onto a smooth curve such that the general fibre is P1 and such that every fibre is
reduced and has at most two irreducible components. Then
a) ϕ is a conic bundle;
b) S has at most Ak-singularities; and
c) if s ∈ Ssing, then s = Fϕ(s),1 ∩ Fϕ(s),2 where Fϕ(s) = Fϕ(s),1 + Fϕ(s),2 is
the decomposition of the fibre over ϕ(s) in its irreducible components. In
particular Fϕ(s) is a reducible conic.
Proof. If a fibre ϕ−1(t) is irreducible, then ϕ is a P1-bundle in a neighbourhood of
ϕ−1(t) [Kol96, II, Thm.2.8]. Thus we only have to consider points t ∈ T such that
St := ϕ−1(t) is reducible. Since pa(St) = 0 and St = C1 + C2 is reduced, we see
4
that St is a union of two P1's meeting transversally in a point. Since St = ϕ∗t is a
Cartier divisor, this already implies c).
Let ε : S → S be the minimal resolution of the singular points lying on St. Then
we have
K S ≡ ε∗KS − E,
with E an effective ε-exceptional Q-divisor. Denote by Ci the proper transform of
Ci. If K S · Ci < −1, then Ci deforms in S [Kol96, II, Thm.1.15]. Yet Ci is an
irreducible component of a reducible ϕ ◦ ε-fibre, so this is impossible. So we have
KS · Ci ≥ K S · Ci ≥ −1
for i = 1, 2. Since KS · (C1 + C2) = −2, this implies that KS · Ci = −1 and
E = 0. Thus S has canonical singularities. Since canonical surface singularities are
Gorenstein we see that −KS is Cartier, ϕ-ample and defines an embedding
into a P2-bundle mapping each fibre onto a conic. This proves a).
S ⊂ P(V := ϕ∗(OS(−KS)))
Since ε is crepant, the divisor −K S is ϕ ◦ ε-nef. Moreover the proper transforms
(cid:3)
Ci are (−1)-curves in S. By Lemma 2.2 this proves b).
The following fundamental lemma should be seen as an analogue of the basic
fact that a projective bundle over a curve contains at most one curve with negative
self-intersection.
2.4. Lemma [Miy04, Prop.2.4]. Let S be a normal projective surface that is a conic
bundle ϕ : S → T over a smooth curve T , and denote by ∆ the discriminant locus.
Suppose that ϕ has two disjoint sections σ1 and σ2, both contained in the smooth
locus of S. Suppose moreover that for every t ∈ ∆, the fibre Ft has a decomposition
Ft = Ft,1 + Ft,2 such that
(C1)
σi · Ft,j = δi,j.
Eventually, assume that there exists a nef and big divisor H on S such that
(C2)
Let ε : S → S be the minimal resolution. Let σ be a ϕ-section, and σ ⊂ S its proper
transform. Then the following holds:
H · σ1 = H · σ2 = 0.
a) If (σ)2 < 0, then σ = σ1 or σ = σ2.
b) If (σ)2 = 0 then σ is disjoint from σ1 ∪ σ2.
Remark. In the situation above the conic bundle does not have any non-reduced
fibre, since there exists a section that is contained in the smooth locus.
Proof. Preparation: contraction to a smooth ruled surface. Lemma 2.3 applies to
the surface S. It follows that S has an Akt -singularity (kt ≥ 0) in Ft,1 ∩ Ft,2 for
every t ∈ ∆, and no further singularity. In particular, the dual graph of (ϕ ◦ ε)−1(t)
is as described in Lemma 2.2 for every t ∈ ∆.
We consider the birational morphism
µ : S → S♭
5
defined as the composition, for every t ∈ ∆, of the blow-down of the proper trans-
form Ft,1 of Ft,1 and of all the kt (−2)-curves contained in (ϕ ◦ ε)−1(t). Since µ is a
composition of blow-down of (−1)-curves, the surface S♭ is smooth. By the rigidity
lemma [Deb01, Lemma 1.15], there is a morphism ϕ♭ : S♭ → T . All its fibres are ir-
reducible rational curves, so it is a P1-bundle by [Kol96, II, Thm.2.8]. Again by the
rigidity lemma, µ factors through ε, i.e. there is a birational morphism µ : S → S♭
such that µ = µ ◦ ε; it is the contraction of all the curves Ft,1, t ∈ ∆.
Since σ1 meets Ft,1 in a smooth point of S, the proper transforms σ1 and Ft,1
meet in the same point. Thus (the successive images of) σ1 meets the exceptional
divisor of all the blow-downs of (−1)-curves composing µ, and since the section
σ♭
1 := µ(σ1) is smooth, all the intersections are transversal. Vice versa we can say
that S is obtained from S♭ by blowing up points on (the proper transforms of) σ♭
1.
By the symmetry condition (C1) the curve σ2 is disjoint from the µ-exceptional
2)2 = (σ2)2. Since H · σ2 = 0 the
2 < 0. In the notation of [Har77, V,Ch.2]
2)2 > 0. In particular the
2 = 0
locus, so if we set σ♭
Hodge index theorem implies (σ♭
ϕ♭ : S♭ → T is a ruled surface with invariant −e := (σ♭
Mori cone NE(S♭) is generated by a general ϕ♭-fibre F and σ♭
and σ♭
2 := µ(σ2), then we have (σ♭
2. Since σ♭
2)2 = σ2
1 · F = 1, we have
1 · σ♭
(2.4.1)
σ♭
1 ≡ σ♭
2 + eF.
Conclusion. Let now σ ⊂ S be a section that is distinct from both σ1 and σ2. Then
σ♭ := µ(σ) is distinct from both σ♭
2 we have
(2.4.2)
1 and σ♭
σ♭ ≡ σ♭
2. Since σ♭ 6= σ♭
2 + cF
for some c ≥ e [Har77, V, Prop.2.20]. Since σ♭ 6= σ♭
1 we have
(2.4.3)
σ♭ · σ♭
1 ≥ X
τt,
t∈∆
where τt is the intersection multiplicity of σ♭ and σ♭
1. Denote
by σ ⊂ S the proper transform of σ ⊂ S, which is also the proper transform of
σ♭ ⊂ S♭. By our description of µ as a sequence of blow-ups in σ♭
min(τt, kt + 1) ≥ (σ♭)2 − X
1 at the point Ft ∩ σ♭
(σ)2 = (σ♭)2 − X
1 we obtain
τt.
By (2.4.3) this implies
t∈∆
t∈∆
(σ)2 ≥ (σ♭)2 − σ♭ · σ♭
1 = σ♭ · (σ♭ − σ♭
1).
Plugging in (2.4.1) and (2.4.2) we obtain
(2.4.4)
(σ)2 ≥ c − e ≥ 0.
This shows statement a).
Suppose now that (σ)2 = 0. Then by (2.4.4) we have c = e, hence σ♭ · σ♭
2 = 0.
Being distinct, the two curves σ♭ and σ♭
2 are therefore disjoint, and so are their
proper transforms σ and σ2. Note now that ε is an isomorphism in a neighbourhood
of σ2, so σ = ε(σ) is disjoint from σ2 = ε(σ2). In order to see that σ and σ1 are
disjoint, we repeat the same argument but contract those fibre components which
meet σ2. This proves statement b).
(cid:3)
6
3. The main construction
3.1. Set-up. For the whole section, we let X 6≃ Pn be a Fano manifold of dimension
n ≥ 4, and suppose that
(3.1.1)
− KX · C ≥ n for all rational curves C ⊂ X.
This is the situation of Proposition E; let us show that it implies that the Picard
number ρ(X) equals 1.
The Mori cone NE(X) generates NS(X) as a vector space, and since X is Fano
the number of extremal rays of NE(X) is therefore at least ρ(X). Now the Ionescu --
Wiśniewski inequality [Ion86, Thm.0.4], [Wiś91, Thm.1.1] implies that the contrac-
tion of any extremal ray of NE(X) is of fibre type, with a base of dimension at
most 1. If ρ(X) > 1, there are therefore at least two Mori fibrations, with bases of
dimension 1; but then their respective fibres are divisors in X, and since n > 2 their
intersection contains a curve that is contracted by both fibrations, a contradiction.
Recall that a family of minimal rational curves is an irreducible component K of
RatCurvesn(X) such that the curves in K dominate X, and for x ∈ X general the
algebraic set K♭
x ⊂ K parametrising curves passing through x is proper. We will
use the following simple observation:
3.2. Lemma. In the situation of Proposition E, let l ⊂ X be a rational curve such
that −KX · l = n. Then any irreducible component K of RatCurvesn X containing
[l] is a family of minimal rational curves.
Proof. Condition (3.1.1) implies the properness of K [Kol96, II, (2.14)], so we only
have to show that the deformations of l dominate X. We have dim K ≥ 2n − 3 by
[Kol96, II, Thm.1.2, Thm.2.15]. Thus if K is not covering, then for a point x ∈ X
such that K♭
x ≥ n − 1. Yet by the bend-and-break lemma
[Deb01, Prop.3.2] the universal family over K♭
x has a generically finite map to X.
Thus the curves in K♭
(cid:3)
x 6= ∅ one has dim K♭
x dominate X, a contradiction.
3.3. Minimal rational curves and VMRTs. Since X is Fano, it contains a
rational curve l. Since X 6≃ Pn, there exists a rational curve with −KX · l = n
by [CMSB02], and by Lemma 3.2 there exists a family of minimal rational curves
containing the point [l] ∈ RatCurvesn(X). We fix once and for all such a family,
which we call K.
For x ∈ X general, denote by Kx the normalisation of the algebraic set K♭
x ⊂ K
parametrising curves passing through x. Every member of K♭
x is a free curve (this
follows from the argument of [Kol96, II, proof of Thm.3.11]), so Kx is smooth and
has dimension n − 2 ≥ 2 [Kol96, II, (1.7) and (2.16)].
By results of Kebekus, a general curve [l] ∈ K♭
x is smooth [Keb02b, Thm.3.3],
and the tangent map
τx : Kx → P(ΩX,x)
which to a general curve [l] associates its tangent direction T ⊥
l,x is a finite morphism
[Keb02b, Thm.3.4]. Its image Vx is called the variety of minimal rational tangents
(VMRT) at x. The map τx is birational by [HM04, Thm.1], so the normalisation
of Vx is Kx, which is smooth (this is [HM04, Cor.1]). Also, one can associate to a
general point v ∈ Vx a unique minimal curve [l] ∈ Kx. We denote by V ⊂ P(ΩX )
7
the total VMRT, i.e. the closure of the locus covered by the VMRTs Vx for x ∈ X
general. Since Kx has dimension n − 2, the total VMRT V is a divisor in P(ΩX ).
For a general [l] ∈ K, one has
(3.3.1)
TXl ≃ OP1(2) ⊕ OP1 (1)⊕n−2 ⊕ OP1
[Deb01, Exercise 4.8.3]. We call a minimal rational curve [l] ∈ K standard if l is
smooth and the bundle TX l has the same splitting type as in (3.3.1).
3.4. Smoothing pairs of minimal curves. For a general point x1 ∈ X, by the
bend-and-break lemma [Deb01, Prop.3.2] the curves parametrised by Kx1 cover a
divisor Dx1 ⊂ X. This divisor is ample because ρ(X) = 1, so for x2 ∈ X and
[l2] ∈ Kx2 the curve l2 intersects Dx1. Thus for a pair of general points x1, x2 ∈ X
we can find a chain of two standard curves l1 ∪ l2 connecting the points x1 and x2.
x1 be the locus covered by all the minimal rational curves of X passing
through x1. It is itself a divisor, but may be bigger than Dx1 since in general there
are finitely many families of minimal curves. We choose a pair of general points
x1, x2 ∈ X such that x2 6∈ loc1
x2), and consider a chain of
two standard curves l1 ∪ l2 connecting the points x1 and x2 as above.
x1 (which implies x1 6∈ loc1
Let loc1
By [Kol96, II, Ex.7.6.4.1] the union l1 ∪ l2 is dominated by a transverse union
P1 ∪ P1. Since both rational curves are free we can smooth the tree P1 ∪ P1 keeping
the point x1 fixed [Kol96, II, Thm.7.6.1]. Since x1 is general in X this defines a
family of rational curves dominating X, and we denote by W the normalisation of
the irreducible component of Chow(X) containing these rational curves.
3.5. Since a general member [C] of the family W is free and −KX · C = 2n, we
have dim W = 3n − 3. We pick an arbitrary irreducible component of the subset
of W parametrising cycles containing x1, and let Wx1 be its normalisation; then
we have dim Wx1 = 2n − 2. Let Ux1 be the normalisation of the universal family
of cycles over Wx1. The evaluation map evx1 : Ux1 → X is surjective: its image
is irreducible, and it contains both the divisor Dx1 (because it is contained in the
image of the restriction of evx1 to those members of Wx1 that contain a minimal
curve through x1) and the point x2 6∈ Dx1.
Next, we choose an arbitrary irreducible component of the subset of W
parametrising cycles passing through x1 and x2, and let Wx1,x2 be its normali-
sation, Ux1,x2 the normalisation of the universal family over Wx1,x2. We denote
by
q : Ux1,x2 → Wx1,x2 ,
ev : Ux1,x2 → X
the natural maps. It follows from the considerations above that Wx1,x2 is non-empty
of dimension n − 1.
By construction, a general curve [C] ∈ Wx1,x2 is smooth at xi, i ∈ {1, 2}, so the
preimage ev−1(xi) contains a unique divisor σi that surjects onto Wx1,x2. Since ev
is finite on the q-fibres and Wx1,x2 is normal, we obtain that the degree one map
σi → Wx1,x2 is an isomorphism. We call the divisors σi the distinguished sections
of q.
Let ∆ ⊂ Wx1,x2 be the locus parametrising non-integral cycles.
3.6. Lemma. In the situation of Proposition E and using the notation introduced
above, let
C = X aili
8
be a non-integral cycle corresponding to a point [C] ∈ ∆. Then C = l1 + l2, with
the li minimal rational curves such that xi ∈ lj if and only if i = j.
Remark. Note that we do not claim that the curves li belong to the family K.
However by construction of the family W as smoothings of pairs l1 ∪ l2 in K there
exists an irreducible component ∆K ⊂ ∆ such that li ∈ K.
Proof. By [Kol96, II, Prop.2.2] all the irreducible components li are rational curves.
We can suppose that up to renumbering one has x1 ∈ l1. If a1 ≥ 2, then −KX · C =
2n and −KX · l1 ≥ n implies that C = 2l1 and l1 is a minimal rational curve. Yet
this contradicts the assumption x2 6∈ loc1
x1. Thus we have a1 = 1 and since C is
not integral there exists a second irreducible component l2. Again −KX · C = 2n
and −KX · li ≥ n implies C = l1 + l2 and the li are minimal rational curves by
Lemma 3.2. The last property now follows by observing that x2 6∈ loc1
x1 implies
that x1 6∈ loc1
(cid:3)
x2 .
By [Kol96, II, Thm.2.8], the fibration q : Ux1,x2 → Wx1,x2 is a P1-bundle over
the open set Wx1,x2 \ ∆. Although Lemma 3.6 essentially says that the singular
fibres are reducible conics, it is a priori not clear that q is a conic bundle (cf.
Definition 2.1). This becomes true after we make a base change to a smooth curve.
3.7. Lemma. In the situation of Proposition E and using the notation introduced
above, let Z ⊂ Wx1,x2 be a curve such that a general point of Z parametrises
an irreducible curve. Then there exists a finite morphism T → Z such that the
normalisation S of the fibre product Ux1,x2 ×Wx1 ,x2
T has a conic bundle structure
ϕ : S → T that satisfies the conditions of Lemma 2.4.
Proof. Let ν : Z → Z be the normalisation, and let N be the normalisation of
Z, fN : N → X the morphism induced by ev : Ux1,x2 → X. Since all
Ux1,x2 ×Wx1 ,x2
the curves pass through x1 and x2 there exists a curve Z1 ⊂ N (resp. Z2 ⊂ N ) that
is contracted by fN onto the point x1 (resp. x2). Since ev is finite on the q-fibres,
the curves Z1 and Z2 are multisections of N → Z. If Zi is the normalisation of
Zi) → Zi has a section given by c 7→ (c, c). Thus
Zi, then the fibration (N × Z
there exists a finite base change T → Z such that the normalisation ϕ : S → T
T ) → T has a natural morphism f : S → X
of the fibre product (Ux1,x2 ×Wx1 ,x2
induced by ev : Ux1,x2 → X and contracts two ϕ-sections σ1 and σ2 on x1 and x2
respectively.
Since Z 6⊂ ∆, the general ϕ-fibre is P1. Moreover by Lemma 3.6 all the ϕ-fibres
are reduced and have at most two irreducible components. By Lemma 2.3 this
implies that ϕ is a conic bundle and if s ∈ Ssing, then Fϕ(s) is a reducible conic and
the two irreducible components meet in s. Thus we have σi ⊂ Snons, since oth-
erwise both irreducible components would pass through xi, thereby contradicting
the property that x2 6∈ loc1
x1. For the same reason we can decompose any reducible
ϕ-fibre Ft by defining Ft,i as the unique component meeting the section σi. Since
σi · F = 1 for a general ϕ-fibre we see that (C1) holds. Condition (C2) holds with
H the pull-back of an ample divisor on X.
(cid:3)
From this one deduces with Lemma 2.4 the following statement, in the spirit of
the bend-and-break lemma [Deb01, Prop.3.2].
9
3.8. Lemma. The restriction of the evaluation map ev : Ux1,x2 → X to the
complement of σ1 ∪ σ2 is quasi-finite. In particular ev is generically finite onto its
image.
Proof. We argue by contradiction. Since ev is finite on the q-fibres there exists
a curve Z ⊂ Wx1,x2 such that the natural map from the surface q−1(Z) onto
ev(q−1(Z)) contracts three disjoint curves σ1, σ2 and σ onto the points x1, x2 and
x.
If Z 6⊂ ∆, then by Lemma 3.7 we can suppose, possibly up to a finite base change,
that q−1(Z) → Z satisfies the conditions (C1) of Lemma 2.4. After a further base
change we can assume that σ is a section. Since σ is contracted by ev we have
σ2 < 0. By Lemma 2.4,a), this implies σ = σ1 or σ = σ2, a contradiction.
If Z ⊂ ∆, then all the fibres over Z are unions of two minimal rational curves.
Thus the normalisation of q−1(Z) is a union of two P1-bundles mapping onto Z and
by construction they contain three curves which are mapped onto points. However
a ruled surface contains at most one contractible curve, a contradiction.
(cid:3)
3.9. Since dim Ux1,x2 = dim X, one deduces from Lemma 3.8 above that the cycles
[C] ∈ W passing through x1, x2 cover the manifold X. By [Deb01, 4.10] this implies
that a general member [C] ∈ Wx1,x2 is a 2-free rational curve [Deb01, Defn.4.5].
Since −KX · C = 2n, this forces
(3.9.1)
f ∗TX ≃ OP1(2)⊕n,
where f : P1 → C ⊂ X is the normalisation of C. As a consequence, one sees from
[Kol96, II, Thm.3.14.3] that a general member [C] ∈ W is a smooth rational curve
in X.
Let Hom◦
W ⊂ Hom(P1, X) be the irreducible open set parametrising morphisms
f : P1 → X such that the image C := f (P1) is smooth, the associated cycle
[C] ∈ Chow(X) is a point in W, and f ∗TX has the splitting type (3.9.1). By
what precedes, the image of Hom◦
W in W under the natural map Hom(P1, X) →
Chow(X) is a dense open set W ◦ ⊂ W.
3.10. Denote by π : P(ΩX ) → X the projection map. We define an injective map
i : Hom◦
W ֒→ Hom(P1, P(ΩX ))
by mapping f : P1 → X to the morphism f : P1 → P(ΩX ) corresponding to the
invertible quotient f ∗ΩX → ΩP1. Correspondingly, for [C] ∈ W ◦ with normalisation
f , we call [ C] the member of Chow(P(ΩX )) corresponding to the lifting f .
We let Hom∼
W be the image of i. Note that it parametrises a family of ra-
tional curves that dominates P(ΩX ), but it is not an irreducible component of
Hom(P1, P(ΩX )).
W is contained in a (much bigger) irreducible
component defined by morphisms corresponding to arbitrary quotients f ∗ΩX ։
OP1(−2).
Indeed, Hom∼
The following property is well-known to experts. Since Hom∼
W is not an open
set of the Hom-space Hom(P1, P(ΩX )), we have to adapt the proof of [Kol96,
II,Prop.3.7].
3.11. Lemma. In the situation of Proposition E, let V0 ⊂ V be a dense, Zariski
open set in the total VMRT V, and let C := f (P1) be a rational curve parametrised
10
by a general point of Hom∼
W . Then one has
(V ∩ C) ⊂ (V0 ∩ C).
z , x), where Cvz ⊂ TX,x is a
z , x) ∈ P(ΩX ), the
W mapping p to z correspond to morphisms f : P1 → X in
W mapping p to x with tangent direction Cvz. Since f has the splitting type
Proof. Set Z := V \ V0. A point z ∈ P(ΩX ) is z = (v⊥
tangent direction in X at x = π(z). So for all p ∈ P1, z = (v⊥
morphisms [ f ] ∈ Hom∼
Hom◦
(3.9.1), the set of these morphisms has dimension exactly n. It follows that
Hom∼
W,Z := (cid:8)[ f ] ∈ Hom∼
W f (P1) ∩ Z 6= ∅(cid:9) = [
[
(cid:8)[ f ] ∈ Hom∼
W f (p) = z(cid:9)
has dimension at most dim Z + 1 + n.
z∈Z
p∈P1
Now V ⊂ P(ΩX ) is a divisor, and Z has codimension at least one in V, so Z
W,Z above has dimension at most
W → Hom∼
W is injective, a general
(cid:3)
has dimension at most 2n − 3, and the set Hom∼
3n − 2. Since Hom◦
W has dimension 3n and Hom◦
point [ f ] ∈ Hom∼
W is not in Hom∼
W,Z.
We need one more technical statement:
3.12. Lemma. In the situation of Proposition E and using the notation introduced
above, let [f ] ∈ Hom◦
W be a general point. Then for every x ∈ f (P1) we have
f (P1) 6⊂ loc1
x.
Proof. Fix two general points x1, x2 ∈ X. A general morphism [f ] ∈ Hom◦
W passing
through x1 and x2 is 2-free and up to reparametrisation we have f (0) = x1, f (∞) =
x2. Set g := f {0,∞}, then f is free over g [Kol96, II, Defn.3.1]. Suppose now
that such a curve has the property f (P1) ⊂ loc1
x0 for some x0 ∈ f (P1). Thus
x1, x2 ∈ loc1
x1 ∩ loc1
x2 ). Yet the intersection
x0, hence by symmetry x0 ∈ (loc1
x1 ∩ loc1
x2
loc1
has codimension two in X. By [Kol96, II, Prop.3.7] a general deformation of f over
g is disjoint from this set.
(cid:3)
3.13. Proof of Proposition E. Arguing by contradiction, we suppose that V · C >
0 ( C is not contained in V for the general [C] ∈ W ◦). Applying Lemma 3.11 with
V0 := {v⊥ ∈ V Cv = Tl,π(v) where [l] ∈ K is standard},
we see that for a general point [C] ∈ W there exists a point x1 ∈ C and a standard
curve [l] ∈ Kx1 such that
(3.13.1)
TC,x1 = Tl,x1 .
We shall now reformulate the property (3.13.1) in terms of the universal family
Ux1,x2, with x2 a point chosen in C \ loc1
x1 thanks to Lemma 3.12. Consider the
blow-up ε : X → X at the point x1, with exceptional divisor E1. Since the general
99K X such
member of Wx1,x2 is smooth at x1, there is a rational map ev : Ux1,x2
that ε ◦ ev = ev (on the locus where ev is defined). It restricts to a well-defined
rational map σ1 99K E1 which is dominant, and therefore generically finite, because
the general member of Wx1,x2 is 2-free. In particular we may assume it is finite in
a neighbourhood of the point C ∩ σ1.
11
We then consider the proper transform l of l under ε, and let Γ be an irreducible
component of ev−1(l) passing through C ∩ σ1. It is a curve that is mapped to a
curve in Wx1,x2 by q. Also, applying the same construction to the divisor Dx1 ⊂ X,
one gets a prime divisor G ⊂ Ux1,x2 mapping surjectively onto Dx1 and Wx1,x2
respectively.
Since both maps qG and evG are étale at the general point of G, for the general
l′ ∈ Kx1 there exists a curve Γ′ ⊂ G such that q(Γ′) is a curve, ev(Γ′) = l′, both
maps qG and evG are étale at the general point x ∈ l′, and there is [C′] ∈ W ◦ such
that the point C′ ∩ σ1 lies on Γ′. Yet this is a contradiction to Proposition 3.14
below.
(cid:3)
3.14. Proposition [Miy04, Lemma 3.9]. In the situation of Proposition E, let
x1, x2 ∈ X be general points, and [l] a general member of Kx1. Consider an irre-
ducible curve Γ ⊂ Ux1,x2 such that ev(Γ) = l and q(Γ) is a curve, and assume there
exists a prime divisor G ⊂ Ux1,x2 mapped onto Dx1 by ev and containing Γ, such
that both maps qG and evG are étale at a general point of Γ. Then Γ ∩ σ1 does
not contain any point C ∩ σ1 with [C] ∈ W ◦.
We give the proof for the sake of completeness.
Proof. Since [l] is general in Kx1 , we have
TX l ≃ OP1(2) ⊕ OP1(1)n−2 ⊕ OP1 ,
and Kx1 is smooth with tangent space H 0(l, N +
l/X ⊗ Ol(−x1)) at [l], where E +
denotes the ample part of a vector bundle E → P1, i.e. its ample subbundle of
maximal rank.
Let x ∈ Γ be a general point, and set y = ev(x) ∈ l. For some analytic neigh-
bourhood V ⊂ Kx1 of [l], we have an evaluation map
P1 × V −→ Dx1
which is étale at (y, [l]), and the tangent space to Dx1 at y is thus
TDx1 ,y = Tl,y ⊕ (cid:0)N +
l/X ⊗ Ol(−x1)(cid:1)y = TX +
l,y.
Since qG and evG are étale in x we obtain that
(3.14.1)
(q∗TWx1 ,x2 )x = ev∗TX+
l,ev(x)
as subspaces of TUx1,x2 ,x.
We argue by contradiction and suppose that there exists [C] ∈ W ◦ such that (C ∩
σ1) ∈ (Γ ∩ σ1). Since Γ maps onto l it is not contained in the divisor σ1. Since the
smooth rational curve C is 2-free, there exists by semicontinuity a neighbourhood
U of [C] ∈ Wx1,x2 parametrising 2-free smooth rational curves. For a 2-free rational
curve, the evaluation morphism ev is smooth in the complement of the distinguished
divisors σi [Kol96, II, Prop.3.5.1]. Thus if we denote by R ⊂ Ux1,x2 the ramification
divisor of ev, σ1 is the unique irreducible component of R containing the point
C ∩ σ1. Thus Γ is not contained in the ramification divisor of ev.
Since q(Γ) is a curve, there exists by Lemma 3.7 a finite base change T →
q(Γ) with T a smooth curve, such that the normalisation S of the fibre product
T ×Wx1,x2 Ux1,x2 is a surface with a conic bundle structure ϕ : S → T satisfying
the conditions of Lemma 2.4. After a further base change we may suppose that
12
there exists a ϕ-section Γ1 that maps onto Γ. Note that since we obtained S by
a base change from Ux1,x2, the ramification divisor of the map µ : S → Ux1,x2 is
contained in the ϕ-fibres, i.e. its image by ϕ has dimension 0. In particular Γ1 is
not contained in this ramification locus.
Since the rational curve C is smooth and 2-free, the universal family Ux1,x2 is
smooth in a neighbourhood of C ∩ σ1. Thus σ1 is a Cartier divisor in a neighbour-
hood of C ∩ σ1, and we can use the projection formula to see that
Γ1 · µ∗σ1 = µ∗(Γ1) · σ1 > 0.
In particular Γ1 is not disjoint from the distinguished sections in the conic bundle
S → T . Let now ε : S → S be the minimal resolution of singularities, and Γ1 the
proper transform of Γ1. Since the distinguished sections are in the smooth locus of
S, the section Γ1 is not disjoint from the distinguished sections of S → T . We shall
now show that
which is a contradiction to Lemma 2.4.
(Γ1)2 ≤ 0,
Denote by f : Γ1 → l the restriction of ev ◦ µ ◦ ε : S → X. Since Γ1 is not in the
ramification locus of µ ◦ ε and Γ is not in the ramification divisor of ev, the tangent
map
T SΓ1
→ f ∗TX l
is generically injective. Since Γ1 is a ϕ ◦ ε-section, we have an isomorphism
(3.14.2)
T S/T Γ1
≃ NΓ1/ S.
Since l has the standard splitting type (3.3.1) we have a (unique) trivial quotient
f ∗TX l ։ OΓ1
, and thanks to (3.14.2) we are done if we prove that the natural
map
T S/T Γ1
֒→ T SΓ1
→ f ∗TXl ։ OΓ1
is not zero. It is sufficient to check this property for a general point in Γ1, and since
Γ1 → Γ is generically étale, it is sufficient to check that for a general x ∈ Γ, the
natural map
TUx1 ,x2 /Wx1 ,x2 ,x → ev∗(TX,ev(x))
does not have its image into the ample part ev∗(TX +
l,ev(x)). Yet by (3.14.1) we
know that (q∗TWx1 ,x2 )x maps into the ample part. Thus if TUx1 ,x2 /Wx1 ,x2 ,x also
maps into the ample part, then the tangent map
TUx1 ,x2 ,x → ev∗(TX,ev(x))
cannot be surjective. Since Γ is not contained in the ramification locus of ev this
is a contradiction.
(cid:3)
4. Proof of the main theorem
4.1. Proof of Theorem C. If X ≃ Pn we are done, so suppose that this is not
the case. Then consider the family of minimal rational curves K constructed in
Section 3 and the associated total VMRT V. Denote by d ∈ N the degree of a
general VMRT Vx ⊂ P(ΩX,x).
13
Step 1. Using the family W ◦. In this step we prove that
(4.1.1)
V ∼Q d(ζ −
1
n
π∗KX ),
where ζ is the tautological divisor class on P(ΩX ). Note that P(ΩX ) has Picard
number two, so we can always write
V ∼Q aζ + b
−1
n
π∗KX
with a, b ∈ Q. Let now W ◦ be the family of rational curves constructed in Section 3,
and let C be the lifting of a curve C ∈ W ◦. By Proposition E we have V · C = 0.
n π∗KX · C = 2, it follows
Since by the definition of C one has ζ · C = −2 and − 1
that a = b. Since Vx = VP(ΩX,x) ∼Q dζP(ΩX,x), we have a = b = d. This proves
(4.1.1).
Step 2. Bounding the degree d. Denote by K◦ ⊂ K the open set parametrising
smooth standard rational curves in K. We define an injective map
j : K◦ ֒→ RatCurvesn(P(ΩX ))
by mapping a curve l to the image l of the morphism s : l → P(ΩX ) defined by
the invertible quotient ΩX l → Ωl. We denote by K◦ the image of j. Let us start
by showing that K◦ is dense in an irreducible component of RatCurvesn(P(ΩX )).
Arguing by contradiction we suppose that K◦ is contained in an irreducible com-
ponent R of dimension strictly larger than 2n − 3. The projection π defines a
map π∗ between the spaces of rational curves, and by construction π∗(R) contains
K◦. Since K◦ is dense in an irreducible component of RatCurvesn(X) we obtain
that (up to replacing R by a Zariski open set) we have a map π∗ : R → K◦.
Since dim R > 2n − 3 this map has positive-dimensional fibres, so a general curve
l deforms in P(ΩX l). Yet this is impossible since
Nl/P(ΩX l) ≃ OP1(−2) ⊕ OP1(−1)⊕n−2.
By construction the lifted curves l are contained in V. Thus the open set K0 ⊂
RatCurvesn(P(ΩX )) is actually an open set in RatCurvesn(V). Since V ⊂ P(ΩX ) is
a hypersurface, the algebraic set V has lci singularities. Thus we can apply [Kol96,
II, Thm.1.3, Thm.2.15] and obtain
2n − 3 = dim K0 ≥ −KV · l + (2n − 2) − 3.
We thus have −KV · l ≤ 2.
Now by construction we have − 1
n π∗KX · l = 1 and ζ · l = −2. Since KP(ΩX ) =
2π∗KX − nζ, the adjunction formula and (4.1.1) yield
2 ≥ −KV · l = −(KP(ΩX ) + V) · l = d.
Step 3. Conclusion. If d = 1 or d = 2 but Vx is reducible, we obtain a contradiction
to [Hwa07, Thm.1.5] (cf. also [Ara06, Thm.3.1]). If d = 2 and Vx is irreducible, Vx
is normal [Har77, II,Ex.6.5(a)], and therefore isomorphic to its normalisation Kx
which is smooth (see §3.3). It is thus a smooth quadric and we conclude by [Mok08,
Main Thm.].
(cid:3)
4.2. Remark. Let us explain the difference of our proof with Miyaoka's approach:
in the notation of Section 3, he considers the family Wx1,x2. As we have seen
above the evaluation map ev : Ux1,x2 → X is generically finite and his goal is to
14
prove that ev is birational. He therefore analyses the preimage ev−1(l1 ∪ l2), where
the li ⊂ X are general minimal curves passing through xi respectively such that
If Γ ⊂ ev−1(l1 ∪ l2) is an irreducible curve mapping onto l1
[l1 ∪ l2] ∈ Wx1,x2.
one can make a case distinction:
if q(Γ) is a curve that is not contained in the
discriminant locus ∆ ⊂ Wx1,x2 (Case C in [Miy04, p.227]) Miyaoka makes a very
interesting observation which we stated as Proposition 3.14. However the analysis
of the 'trivial' case (Case A in [Miy04, p.227]) where q(Γ) is a point is not correct:
it is not clear that q(Γ) = [l1 ∪ l2], because there might be another curve in Wx1,x2
which is of the form l1 ∪ l′
2. This possibility is an obvious obstruction
to the birationality of ev and invalidates [Miy04, Cor.3.11(2), Cor.3.13(1)]. The
following example shows that this possibility does indeed occur in certain cases.
2 with l2 6= l′
4.3. Example. Let H ⊂ Pn be a hyperplane and A ⊂ H ⊂ Pn a projective
manifold A of dimension n − 2 and degree 3 ≤ a ≤ n. Let µ : X → Pn be the blow-
up of Pn along A. Then X is a Fano manifold [Miy04, Rem.4.2] and −KX · C ≥ n
for every rational curve C ⊂ X passing through a general point (the µ-fibres are
however rational curves with −KX · C = 1). The general member of a family
of minimal rational curves K is the proper transform of a line that intersects A.
Consider the family W whose general member is the strict transform of a reduced,
connected degree two curve C such that A ∩ C is a finite scheme of length two.
For general points x1, x2 ∈ X the (normalised) universal family Ux1,x2 → Wx1,x2 is
a conic bundle and the evaluation map ev : Ux1,x2 → X is generically finite. We
claim that ev is not birational.
Proof of the claim. For simplicity of notation we denote by x1, x2 also the corre-
sponding points in Pn. Let l1 ⊂ Pn be a general line through x1 that intersects
A. Since x2 ∈ Pn is general there exists a unique plane Π containing l1 and x2.
Moreover the intersection Π ∩ A consists of exactly a points, one of them the point
A ∩ l1. For every point x ∈ Π ∩ A other than A ∩ l1, there exists a unique line l2,x
through x and x2. By Bezout's theorem l1 ∪ l2 is connected, so its proper transform
belongs to Wx1,x2. Yet this shows that ev−1(l1) contains a − 1 > 1 copies of l1, one
for each point x ∈ Π ∩ A \ l1 ∩ A. This proves the claim.
(cid:3)
Let us conclude this example by mentioning that the conic bundle Ux1,x2 →
Wx1,x2 does not satisfy the symmetry conditions of Lemma 2.4.
References
[Ara06]
[CD15]
[CH14]
Carolina Araujo. Rational curves of minimal degree and characterizations of projective
spaces. Math. Ann., 335(4):937 -- 951, 2006.
Cinzia Casagrande and Stéphane Druel. Locally unsplit families of rational curves of
large anticanonical degree on Fano manifolds. IMRN, doi:10.1093/imrn/rnv011, 2015.
Junyan Cao and Andreas Höring. Manifolds with nef anticanonical bundle. to appear
in Crelle, doi: 10.1515/crelle-2014-0073, 2014.
[CMSB02] Koji Cho, Yoichi Miyaoka, and N. I. Shepherd-Barron. Characterizations of projec-
tive space and applications to complex symplectic manifolds. In Higher dimensional
birational geometry (Kyoto, 1997), volume 35 of Adv. Stud. Pure Math., pages 1 -- 88.
Math. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 2002.
Olivier Debarre. Higher-dimensional algebraic geometry. Universitext. Springer-
Verlag, New York, 2001.
Robin Hartshorne. Algebraic geometry. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1977. Graduate
Texts in Mathematics, No. 52.
[Deb01]
[Har77]
15
[HM04]
[HN13]
[Hwa01]
[Hwa07]
[Hwa13]
[Ion86]
[Keb02a]
Jun-Muk Hwang and Ngaiming Mok. Birationality of the tangent map for minimal
rational curves. Asian J. Math., 8(1):51 -- 63, 2004.
Andreas Höring and Carla Novelli. Mori contractions of maximal length. Publ. Res.
Inst. Math. Sci., 49(1):215 -- 228, 2013.
Jun-Muk Hwang. Geometry of minimal rational curves on Fano manifolds. In School
on Vanishing Theorems and Effective Results in Algebraic Geometry (Trieste, 2000),
volume 6 of ICTP Lect. Notes, pages 335 -- 393. Abdus Salam Int. Cent. Theoret. Phys.,
Trieste, 2001.
Jun-Muk Hwang. Deformation of holomorphic maps onto Fano manifolds of second
and fourth Betti numbers 1. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 57(3):815 -- 823, 2007.
Jun-Muk Hwang. Varieties of minimal rational tangents of codimension 1. Ann. Sci.
Éc. Norm. Supér. (4), 46(4):629 -- 649 (2013), 2013.
Paltin Ionescu. Generalized adjunction and applications. Math. Proc. Cambridge Phi-
los. Soc., 99(3):457 -- 472, 1986.
Stefan Kebekus. Characterizing the projective space after Cho, Miyaoka and Shepherd-
Barron. In Complex geometry (Göttingen, 2000), pages 147 -- 155. Springer, Berlin,
2002.
[Keb02b] Stefan Kebekus. Families of singular rational curves. J. Algebraic Geom., 11(2):245 --
[KO73]
[Kol96]
[Miy04]
256, 2002.
Shoshichi Kobayashi and Takushiro Ochiai. Characterizations of complex projective
spaces and hyperquadrics. J. Math. Kyoto Univ., 13:31 -- 47, 1973.
János Kollár. Rational curves on algebraic varieties, volume 32 of Ergebnisse der Math-
ematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996.
Yoichi Miyaoka. Numerical characterisations of hyperquadrics. In Complex analysis
in several variables -- Memorial Conference of Kiyoshi Oka's Centennial Birthday,
volume 42 of Adv. Stud. Pure Math., pages 209 -- 235. Math. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 2004.
[Mok08] Ngaiming Mok. Recognizing certain rational homogeneous manifolds of Picard number
1 from their varieties of minimal rational tangents. In Third International Congress of
Chinese Mathematicians. Part 1, 2, volume 2 of AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math., 42, pt.
1, pages 41 -- 61. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2008.
Fumio Sakai. Weil divisors on normal surfaces. Duke Math. J., 51(4):877 -- 887, 1984.
Jarosław A. Wiśniewski. On contractions of extremal rays of Fano manifolds. J. Reine
Angew. Math., 417:141 -- 157, 1991.
[Sak84]
[Wiś91]
Thomas Dedieu, Institut de Mathématiques de Toulouse (CNRS UMR 5219), Uni-
versité Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse Cedex 9, France
E-mail address: [email protected]
Andreas Höring, Laboratoire de Mathématiques J.A. Dieudonné, UMR 7351
CNRS, Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis, 06108 Nice Cedex 02, France
E-mail address: [email protected]
16
|
1007.1226 | 1 | 1007 | 2010-07-07T19:11:43 | Ekedahl-Oort strata of hyperelliptic curves in characteristic 2 | [
"math.AG"
] | Suppose $X$ is a hyperelliptic curve of genus $g$ defined over an algebraically closed field $k$ of characteristic $p=2$. We prove that the de Rham cohomology of $X$ decomposes into pieces indexed by the branch points of the hyperelliptic cover. This allows us to compute the isomorphism class of the $2$-torsion group scheme $J_X[2]$ of the Jacobian of $X$ in terms of the Ekedahl-Oort type. The interesting feature is that $J_X[2]$ depends only on some discrete invariants of $X$, namely, on the ramification invariants associated with the branch points. We give a complete classification of the group schemes which occur as the $2$-torsion group schemes of Jacobians of hyperelliptic $k$-curves of arbitrary genus. | math.AG | math |
EKEDAHL-OORT STRATA OF HYPERELLIPTIC CURVES IN
CHARACTERISTIC 2
ARSEN ELKIN AND RACHEL PRIES
Abstract. Suppose X is a hyperelliptic curve of genus g defined over an algebraically closed field
k of characteristic p = 2. We prove that the de Rham cohomology of X decomposes into pieces
indexed by the branch points of the hyperelliptic cover. This allows us to compute the isomorphism
class of the 2-torsion group scheme JX [2] of the Jacobian of X in terms of the Ekedahl-Oort type.
The interesting feature is that JX [2] depends only on some discrete invariants of X, namely, on the
ramification invariants associated with the branch points. We give a complete classification of the
group schemes which occur as the 2-torsion group schemes of Jacobians of hyperelliptic k-curves of
arbitrary genus.
Keywords: curve, hyperelliptic, Artin-Schreier, Jacobian, p-torsion, a-number, group scheme, de
Rham cohomology, Ekedahl-Oort strata.
MSC: 11G10, 11G20, 14F40, 14H40, 14K15, 14L15
1. Introduction
Suppose k is an algebraically closed field of characteristic p > 0. There are several important
stratifications of the moduli space Ag of principally polarized abelian varieties of dimension g
defined over k, including the Ekedahl-Oort stratification. The Ekedahl-Oort type characterizes
the p-torsion group scheme of the corresponding abelian varieties, and, in particular, determines
invariants of the group scheme such as the p-rank and a-number. It is defined by the interaction
between the Frobenius F and Verschiebung V operators on the p-torsion group scheme. Very little
is known about how the Ekedahl-Oort strata intersect the Torelli locus of Jacobians of curves. In
particular, one would like to know which group schemes occur as the p-torsion JX[p] of the Jacobian
JX of a curve X of genus g.
In this paper, we completely answer this question for hyperelliptic k-curves X of arbitrary genus
when k has characteristic p = 2, a case which is amenable to calculation because of the confluence of
hyperelliptic and Artin-Schreier properties. We first prove a decomposition result about the struc-
ture of H1
dR(X) as a module under the actions of F and V , where the pieces of the decomposition
are indexed by the branch points of the hyperelliptic cover. This is the only decomposition result
about the de Rham cohomology of Artin-Schreier curves that we know of, although the action of V
on H0(X, Ω1) and the action of F on H1(X,O) have been studied for Artin-Schreier curves under
less restrictive hypotheses (e.g., [15, 24]).
In the second result of the paper, we give a complete classification of the isomorphism classes
of group schemes which occur as the 2-torsion group scheme JX [2] for a hyperelliptic k-curve X of
arbitrary genus when char(k) = 2. The group schemes which occur decompose into pieces indexed
by the branch points of the hyperelliptic cover, and we determine the Ekedahl-Oort types of these
pieces.
In particular, we determine which a-numbers occur for the 2-torsion group schemes of
hyperelliptic k-curves of arbitrary genus when char(k) = 2. Before describing the result precisely,
we note that it shows that the group scheme JX[2] depends only on some discrete invariants of X
and not on the location of the branch points or the equation of the hyperelliptic cover. This is in
The first author was partially supported by the Marie Curie Incoming International Fellowship PIIF-GA-2009-
236606. The second author was partially supported by NSF grant DMS-07-01303. The authors would like to thank
Jeff Achter for helpful comments.
1
sharp contrast with the case of hyperelliptic curves in odd characteristic p, where even the p-rank
depends on the location of the branch points, [26].
Here is some notation needed to describe the results precisely.
Notation 1.1. Suppose X is a hyperelliptic curve defined over an algebraically closed field k of
characteristic 2. Let B ⊂ P1(k) be the set of branch points of the hyperelliptic cover π : X → P1
k.
Without loss of generality, one can suppose ∞ 6∈ B. For α ∈ B, the ramification invariant dα is the
largest integer for which the higher ramification group of π above α is non-trivial; note that dα is
odd. Then X has an affine equation of the form y2 − y = f (x) for some f (x) ∈ k(x). Furthermore,
f (x) can be chosen such that its partial fraction decomposition has the form:
where xα := (x − α)−1 and where fα(x) ∈ xk[x2] is a polynomial of degree dα containing no
monomials of even exponent. In particular, the divisor of poles of f (x) on P1
k has the form
f (x) = Xα∈B
fα(cid:0)xα(cid:1)
(1.1)
div∞(f (x)) = Xα∈B
dαα.
Let cα = (dα − 1)/2 and let r = #B − 1.
By the Riemann-Hurwitz formula, the genus of X is g = r + Pα∈B cα. By the Deuring-
Shafarevich formula, the p-rank of JX equals r.
Theorem 1.2. Suppose X is a hyperelliptic k-curve with affine equation y2− y = f (x) as described
in Notation 1.1. For α ∈ B, consider the Artin-Schreier k-curve Yα with affine equation y2 − y =
fα(x). Let E be an ordinary elliptic k-curve. As a module under the actions of F and V , the de
Rham cohomology of X decomposes as:
dR(X) ∼= H1
H1
dR(E)#B−1 ⊕Mα∈B
H1
dR(Yα).
As an application of Theorem 1.2, we give a complete classification of the Ekedahl-Oort types
which occur for hyperelliptic k-curves. For p = 2 and a natural number c, let Gc be the unique sym-
metric BT1 group scheme of rank p2c with Ekedahl-Oort type [0, 1, 1, 2, 2, . . . ,⌊c/2⌋]. For example,
G1 is the p-torsion group scheme of a supersingular elliptic k-curve. The group scheme G2 occurs
as the p-torsion of a supersingular non-superspecial abelian surface over k. The group scheme Gc is
not necessarily indecomposable. More explanation about Gc is given in Sections 2.2 and 5.2. The
a-number of X is aX := dimkHom(αp, JX [p]), where αp is the kernel of Frobenius on Ga.
Theorem 1.3. Suppose X is a hyperelliptic k-curve with affine equation y2− y = f (x) as described
in Notation 1.1. Then the 2-torsion group scheme of the Jacobian variety of X is
and the a-number of X is aX = (g + 1 − #{α ∈ B dα ≡ 1 mod 4})/2.
JX [2] ≃ (Z/2 ⊕ µ2)r ⊕Mα∈B
Gcα,
Theorem 1.3 is stated without proof in [25, 3.2] in the special case that f (x) ∈ k[x], i.e., r = 0.
There are two interesting things about Theorem 1.3. First, it shows that the Ekedahl-Oort type
of X : y2 − y = f (x) depends only on the orders of the poles of f (x). This is in sharp contrast with
the case of hyperelliptic curves in odd characteristic, where even the p-rank depends on f (x) and
the location of the branch points, [26]. Similarly, it is in contrast with the results of [4], [9], [12], all
of which give bounds for the p-rank and a-number of various kinds of curves that depend strongly
on the coefficients of f (x). Likewise, preliminary calculations indicate that it is in contrast with
the situation for Artin-Schreier curves in odd characteristic.
2
Secondly, Theorem 1.3 is interesting because it shows that most of the possibilities for the
2-torsion group scheme do not occur for Jacobians of hyperelliptic k-curves when char(k) = 2.
Specifically, there are 2g possibilities for the 2-torsion group scheme of a g-dimensional abelian
variety over k. We determine a subset of these, having cardinality equal to the number of partitions
of g + 1, and prove that the group schemes in this subset are exactly those which occur as the 2-
torsion JX [2] for a hyperelliptic k-curve X of genus g. Also, Theorem 1.3 gives the non-trivial
bounds (g − r)/2 ≤ aX ≤ (g + 1)/2 for the a-number.
An earlier non-existence result of this type can be found in [8], where the author proved that a
curve X of genus g > p(p − 1)/2 in characteristic p > 0 cannot be superspecial, and thus aX < g.
There are also other recent results about Newton polygons of hyperelliptic (i.e., Artin Schreier)
curves in characteristic 2, including several non-existence results, [21], [2], [1], and counting results
for curves of genus 3 over finite fields, [17].
Here is an outline of this paper: Section 2 contains notation and background. Results on
H0(X, Ω1) and the a-number are in Section 3. Theorem 1.2 is with the material on the de Rham
cohomology in Section 4. Section 5 contains the results about the Ekedahl-Oort type, including
Theorem 1.3.
2. Notation
In this paper, all objects are defined over an algebraically closed field k of characteristic p > 0
and all curves are smooth, projective, and connected.
2.1. The p-torsion group scheme. Suppose A is a principally polarized abelian variety of dimen-
sion g defined over k. For example, A could be the Jacobian of a k-curve of genus g. Consider the
multiplication-by-p morphism [p] : A → A which is a finite flat morphism of degree p2g. It factors
as [p] = V ◦ F . Here F : A → A(p) is the relative Frobenius morphism coming from the p-power
map on the structure sheaf; it is purely inseparable of degree pg. The Verschiebung morphism
V : A(p) → A is the dual of F .
The kernel of [p] is A[p], the p-torsion of A, which is a quasi-polarized BT1 group scheme. In
other words, it is a quasi-polarized finite commutative group scheme annihilated by p, again having
morphisms F and V . The rank of A[p] is p2g. The quasi-polarization implies that A[p] is symmetric.
These group schemes were classified independently by Kraft (unpublished) [13] and by Oort [19].
A complete description of this topic can be found in [19] or [16].
Two invariants of (the p-torsion of) an abelian variety are the p-rank and a-number. The p-
rank of A is r = dimFp Hom(µp, A[p]) where µp is the kernel of Frobenius on Gm. Then pr is the
cardinality of A[p](k). The a-number of A is a = dimk Hom(αp, A[p]) where αp is the kernel of
Frobenius on Ga. It is well-known that 0 ≤ f ≤ g and 1 ≤ a + f ≤ g.
One can describe the group scheme A[p] using the theory of covariant Dieudonn´e modules. This
is the dual of the contravariant theory found in [7]; see also [10, A.5]. Briefly, consider the non-
commutative ring E = k[F, V ] generated by semi-linear operators F and V with the relations
F V = V F = 0 and F λ = λpF and λV = V λp for all λ ∈ k. Let E(A, B) denote the left ideal
EA + EB of E generated by A and B. A deep result is that the Dieudonn´e functor D gives an
equivalence of categories between BT1 group schemes G (with rank p2g) and finite left E-modules
D(G) (having dimension 2g as a k-vector space). For example, the Dieudonn´e module of an ordinary
elliptic curve is D(Z/p ⊕ µp) ≃ E/E(F, 1 − V ) ⊕ E/E(V, 1 − F ), [10, Ex. A.5.1 & 5.3].
[14, 5.2.8].
The p-rank of A[p] is the dimension of V gD(G). The a-number of A[p] equals g − dim(V 2D(G))
2.2. The Ekedahl-Oort type. The isomorphism type of a symmetric BT1 group scheme G over
k can be encapsulated into combinatorial data. This topic can be found in [19]. If G has rank p2g,
then there is a final filtration N1 ⊂ N2 ⊂ ··· ⊂ N2g of D(G) as a k-vector space which is stable
3
under the action of V and F −1 such that i = dim(Ni). If w is a word in V and F −1, then wD(G)
is an object in the filtration. In particular, Ng = V D(G) = F −1(0). If G is quasi-polarized, then
there is a sympletic form on D(G) and N2g−i and Ni are orthogonal under the symplectic pairing.
The Ekedahl-Oort type of G, also called the final type, is ν = [ν1, . . . , νr] where νi = dim(V (Ni)).
The Ekedahl-Oort type of G is canonical, even if the final filtration is not. There is a restriction
νi ≤ νi+1 ≤ νi + 1 on the final type. All sequences satisfying this restriction occur. This implies
that there are 2g isomorphism classes of symmetric BT1 group schemes of rank p2g. The p-rank is
max{i νi = i} and the a-number equals g − νg.
2.3. The de Rham cohomology. Suppose X is a k-curve of genus g and recall the definition of
the non-commutative ring E = k[F, V ] from Section 2.3. By [18, Section 5], there is an isomorphism
of E-modules between the Dieudonn´e module D(JX [p]) and the de Rham cohomology H1
dR(X). In
particular, ker(F ) = H0(X, Ω1) = im(V ). Recall that dimk H1
In [18, Section 5], there is the following description of H1
dR(X). Let U = {Ui} be a covering of X
by affine open subvarieties and let Uij := Ui ∩ Uj and Uijk := Ui ∩ Uj ∩ Uk. For a sheaf F on X, let
dR(X) = 2g.
C0(U ,F)
C1(U ,F)
C2(U ,F)
:= {κ = (κi)i κi ∈ Γ(Ui,F)} ,
:= {φ = (φij)i<j φij ∈ Γ(Uij,F)} ,
:= {ψ = (ψijk)i<j<k ψijk ∈ Γ(Uijk,F)} .
For convenience, let φii := 0 for any φ ∈ C1(U ,F). There are coboundary operators δ : C0(U ,F) →
C1(U ,F) defined by (δκ)i<j = κi − κj; and δ : C1(U ,F) → C2(U ,F) by (δφ)i<j<k = φij − φik + φjk.
All other maps are applied to Cm(U ,F) elementwise, e.g., (F φ)i := F φi.
The de Rham cocycles are defined by
Z1
dR(U ) :=(cid:8)(φ, ω) ∈ C1(U ,O) × C0(U , Ω1) δφ = 0, dφ = δω(cid:9) ,
that is, φij − φik + φjk = 0 and dφij = ωi − ωj for all indices i < j < k. The de Rham coboundaries
are defined by
Finally,
B1
dR(U ) :=(cid:8)(δκ, dκ) ∈ Z1
dR(U ) κ ∈ C 0(U ,O)(cid:9) .
dR(X) ∼= H1
H1
dR(U ) := Z1
dR(U )/B1
dR(U ).
There is an injective homomorphism λ : H0(X, Ω1) → H1
dR(X) denoted informally by ω 7→ (0, ω)
where the second coordinate is defined by ωi = ωUi. This map is well-defined since d(0) =
ωUi − ωUj = (δω)i<j . It is injective because, if (0, ω1) ≡ (0, ω2) mod B1
dR(U ), then ω1 − ω2 = dκ
where κ ∈ C 0(U ,O) is such that δκ = 0; thus κ ∈ H 0(U ,O) ≃ k is a constant function on X and
so ω1 − ω2 = 0.
dR(X) → H1(X,O) sending the cohomology class of (φ, ω)
to the cohomology class of φ. The choice of cocycle (φ, ω) does not matter, since the coboundary
conditions on H1
dR(X) and H1(X,O) are compatible. The homomorphisms λ and γ fit into a short
exact sequence
There is another homomorphism γ : H1
In Subsections 4.4 and 4.6, we construct a suitable section σ : H1(X,O) → H1
is a hyperelliptic k-curve with char(k) = 2.
dR(X) of γ when X
0 → H0(X, Ω1)
λ
−→ H1
dR(X)
γ
−→ H1(X,O) → 0.
2.4. Frobenius and Verschiebung. The Frobenius and Verschiebung operators F and V act on
H1
dR(X) as follows:
F (f, ω) := (f p, 0)
and V (f, ω) := (0, C (ω)),
where C is the Cartier operator [5] on the sheaf Ω1. The operator F is p-linear and V is p−1-linear.
The three principal properties of the Cartier operator are that it annihilates exact differentials,
preserves logarithmic ones, and is p−1-linear. The Cartier operator can be computed as follows. Let
4
x ∈ k(X) be an element which forms a p-basis of k(X) over k(X)p, i.e., such that every z ∈ k(X)
can be written as
z := zp
0 + zp
1x + ··· + zp
p−1xp−1
for uniquely determined z0, . . . , zp−1 ∈ k(X). Then
C (z dx/x) := z0 dx/x.
3. Results about holomorphic 1-forms and the a-number
3.1. Equations. We specialize to the case that k is an algebraically closed field of characteristic
p = 2. Let X be a k-curve of genus g which is hyperelliptic, in other words, for which there exists
a degree two cover π : X → P1.
Let B ⊂ P1(k) denote the set of branch points of π. After a fractional linear transformation, one
can suppose that 0 ∈ B and ∞ /∈ B. For α ∈ B, let Pα := π−1(α) ∈ X(k) be the ramification point
above α. Also consider the divisor D∞ := π−1(∞) on X. Let B∞ := B ∪ {∞}, B′ := B − {0} and
r := #B − 1.
For α ∈ B, let xα = (x − α)−1 and let dα be the ramification invariant at α, namely the largest
integer for which the higher ramification group of π above α is non-trivial. By [23, Prop. III.7.8],
dα is odd. Let cα := (dα − 1)/2.
The cover π is given by an affine equation of the form
y2 − y = f (x)
for some non-constant rational function f (x) ∈ k(x). After a change of variables of the form
y 7→ y + ǫ, one can suppose that the partial fraction decomposition of f (x) has the form:
where fα(x) ∈ xk[x2] is a polynomial of degree dα containing no monomials of even exponent. In
particular, the divisor of poles of f (x) on P1 has the form
f (x) = Xα∈B
fα(cid:0)xα(cid:1),
By the Riemann-Hurwitz formula [22, IV, Prop. 4], the genus of X satisfies
div∞(f (x)) = Xα∈B
dαα.
2g + 2 = Xα∈B
(dα + 1).
By the Deuring-Shafarevich formula [6, Cor. 1.8], the p-rank of X is r. Note that g = r +Pα∈B cα.
The implication of these formulae is that, for a given genus g (and p-rank r), there is an additional
discrete invariant of X, namely a partition of 2g + 2 into (r + 1) even integers dα + 1. In Section
5.1, we show that the Ekedahl-Oort type of X depends only on this discrete invariant.
3.2. The space H0(X, Ω1). For an integer j and for α ∈ B, consider the following 1-forms on X:
ωα,j := xj−1
α
dxα.
Note that ωα,j = −(x − α)−j−1dx and, if α ∈ B′, then ωα,0 − ω0,0 = −αdx/x(x − α).
The following lemma is a variation of a special case of [24, Lemma 1(c)].
Lemma 3.1. A basis for H0(X, Ω1) is given by the 1-forms ωα,j for α ∈ B and 1 ≤ j ≤ cα and
ωα,0 − ω0,0 for α ∈ B′.
5
Proof. For α ∈ B, one can calculate the following divisors on X: div(xα) = D∞ − 2Pα and
div(dxα) = (dα − 3)Pα + Xβ∈B−{α}
(dβ + 1)Pβ
(3.1)
(3.2)
and
Thus ωα,j is holomorphic for 1 ≤ j ≤ cα. Also, ωα,0 − ω0,0 is holomorphic for α ∈ B′ because
div(ωα,j) = 2(cα − j)Pα + (j − 1)D∞ + Xβ∈B−{α}
div(ωα,0 − ω0,0) = 2cαPα + 2c0P0 + Xβ∈B−{0,α}
(dβ + 1)Pβ.
(dβ + 1)Pβ .
This set of holomorphic differentials of X is linearly independent because the corresponding set of
divisors is linearly independent over Z. It forms a basis since the set has cardinality r +Pα∈B cα =
g.
Lemma 3.2. If α ∈ B, then
(cid:3)
C (ωα,j) =(ωα,j/2
0
if j is even,
if j is odd.
In particular, C (ωα,0 − ω0,0) = ωα,0 − ω0,0 for all α ∈ B′.
Proof. Using the properties of the Cartier operator found in Section 2.4, one computes when j is
even that
and when j is odd that
C (dxα/xα) = xj/2−1
α
dxα,
α
C (cid:0)xj−1
α
dxα(cid:1) = xj/2
C (cid:0)xj−1
α
dxα(cid:1) = x(j−1)/2
α
C (dxα) = 0.
(cid:3)
For α ∈ B′, let W ′
α,ss := hωα,0 − ω0,0i, and for α ∈ B, let W ′
α,nil := hωα,j 1 ≤ j ≤ cαi, where h·i
denotes the k-span. These subspaces are invariant under the Cartier operator by Lemma 3.2.
Lemma 3.3. The subspaces W ′
schiebung for each α ∈ B. There is an isomorphism of V -modules:
α,nil.
α,nil of H0(X, Ω1) are stable under the action of Ver-
α,ss and W ′
W ′
W ′
H0(X, Ω1) ≃ Mα∈B′
α,ss ⊕Mα∈B
Proof. This follows immediately from Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2.
(cid:3)
3.3. Application: the a-number.
Proposition 3.4. Suppose X is a hyperelliptic k-curve with affine equation y2 − y = f (x) as
described in Notation 1.1. If div∞(f (x)) = Pα∈B dαα is the divisor of poles of f (x) on P1, then
the a-number of X is
aX =
g + 1 − #{α ∈ B dα ≡ 1 mod 4}
.
2
Proof. The a-number of G = JX [2] is aX = g−dim(V 2D(G)) [14, 5.2.8]. The action of V on V D(G)
is the same as the action of the Cartier operator C on H0(X, Ω1). So aX equals the dimension of
the kernel of C on H0(X, Ω1). By Lemma 3.2, the kernel of C on H0(X, Ω1) is spanned by ωα,j
for α ∈ B and j odd with 1 ≤ j ≤ cα = (dα − 1)/2. Thus the contribution to the a-number from
each α ∈ B is ⌊(dα + 1)/4⌋. In other words, if dα ≡ 1 mod 4, the contribution is (dα − 1)/4 and if
dα ≡ 3 mod 4, the contribution is (dα + 1)/4. Since g + 1 =Pα∈B(dα + 1)/2, this yields
2aX = (g + 1) − #{α ∈ B dα ≡ 1 mod 4} .
(cid:3)
6
3.4. Examples with large p-rank. Let A be a principally polarized abelian variety over k with
dimension g and p-rank r. If r = g, then A[p] ≃ (Z/p⊕ µp)g and the a-number is a = 0. If r = g− 1
then A[p] ≃ (Z/p ⊕ µp)g−1 ⊕ E[p] where E is a supersingular elliptic curve and the a-number is
a = 1. So the first case where A[p] and a are not determined by the p-rank is when r = g − 2.
Example 3.5. Let p = 2 and g ≥ 2. There are two possibilities for the p-torsion group scheme
of a principally polarized abelian variety over k with dimension g and p-rank g − 2. Both of these
occur as the 2-torsion group scheme JX [2] of the Jacobian of a hyperelliptic k-curve X of genus g.
Proof. If A is a principally polarized abelian variety over k with dimension g and p-rank g − 2,
then A[p] ≃ (µp ⊕ Z/p)g−2 ⊕ G where G is isomorphic to the p-torsion group scheme of an abelian
surface Z with p-rank 0. There are two possibilities for G, according to whether Z is superspecial
or merely supersingular: (G1)2, where G1 denotes the p-torsion group scheme of a supersingular
elliptic k-curve; and G2, which is isomorphic to the quotient of (G1)2 by a generic αp subgroup
scheme.
To prove the second claim, consider the two possibilities for a partition of 2g + 2 into r + 1 = g− 1
even integers, namely (A) {2, 2, . . . , 2, 4, 4} or (B) {2, 2, . . . , 2, 2, 6}. In case (A), consider f (x) ∈
k(x) with g − 1 poles, such that 0 and 1 are poles of order 3 and the other poles are simple. In case
(B), consider f (x) ∈ k(x) with g − 1 poles, such that 0 is a pole of order 5 and the other poles are
simple. The kernel of the Cartier operator on H0(X, Ω1) is spanned by dx/x2 and dx/(x − 1)2 in
case (A) and by dx/x2 in case (B). Thus the a-number equals 2 in case (A) and equals 1 in case
(B). In both cases, this completely determines the group scheme. Namely, the group scheme JX [2]
is isomorphic to (Z/2 ⊕ µ2)g−2 ⊕ (G1)2 in case (A) and to (Z/2 ⊕ µ2)g−2 ⊕ G2 in case (B).
(cid:3)
For g ≥ 3 and r ≤ g − 3, the action of V on H0(X, Ω1) (and, in particular, the value of the
a-number) is not sufficient to determine the isomorphism class of the group scheme JX [2]. To
determine this group scheme, in the next section we study the E-module structure of H1
dR(X).
4. Results on the de Rham cohomology
4.1. An open covering. Let V ′ = P1 − B∞ and U ′ = π−1(V ′) = X − π−1(B∞). For α ∈ B∞, let
Vα = V ′ ∪ {α} and Uα = U ′ ∪ {π−1(α)}. The collection U := {Uα α ∈ B∞} is a cover of X by
open affine subvarieties. By construction, if α, β ∈ B∞ are distinct, then Vαβ := Vα ∩ Vβ = V ′ and
Uαβ := Uα ∩ Uβ = U ′. In particular, the subvarieties Uαβ do not depend on the choice of α and β.
For a sheaf F, let Z1(U ,F) and B1(U ,F) denote the closed cocycles and coboundaries of F with
respect to U . Recall the definition of the non-commutative ring E = k[F, V ] and the notation about
dR(X) from Section 2.3. In this section, we compute H1(X,O) ≃ H1(U ,O) and H1
H1
dR(U )
with respect to the open covering U of X.
4.2. Defining components. Given a sheaf F and a cocycle φ ∈ Z1(U ,F), consider its components
φα∞ ∈ Γ(U ′,F) for α ∈ B. We call {φα∞ α ∈ B} the set of defining components of φ. The reason is
that the remaining components of φ are determined by the coboundary condition φαβ = φα∞−φβ∞.
A collection of sections {φα∞ ∈ Γ(U ′,F) α ∈ B} determines a unique closed cocycle φ ∈ Z1(U ,F).
Thus,
(4.1)
dR(X) ≃ H1
Γ(U ′,F).
Z1(U ,F) ∼= Mα∈B
ϕβ : Γ(U ′,O) → Z1(U ,O),
(ϕβ(h))α∞ :=(h if α = β,
0
otherwise.
7
For β ∈ B, consider the natural k-linear map
whose defining components for α ∈ B are
Also, consider the k-linear map ϕ∞ : Γ(U ′,O) → Z1(U ,O) defined by:
(ϕ∞(h))α∞ := −h for all α ∈ B.
Observe that if h ∈ Γ(U ′,O), then
Xβ∈B∞
For β ∈ B∞, consider the natural k-linear map
ϕβ(h) = 0.
given for α ∈ B∞ by
ψβ : Γ(Uβ,O) → C0(U ,O)
(ψβ(h))α :=(h if α = β,
otherwise.
0
(4.2)
(4.3)
It is straightforward to verify the next lemma.
Lemma 4.1. Suppose β ∈ B∞ and h ∈ Γ(Uβ,O) (i.e., h is regular at Pβ if β 6= ∞ and h is regular
at the two points in the support of D∞ if β = ∞). Then ϕβ(hU ′) = δψβ(h) is a coboundary.
4.3. The space H1(X,O). In this section, we find an F -module decomposition of H1(X,O) ≃
H1(U ,O). The results could be deduced from Section 3.2 using the duality between H1(X,O)
and H0(X, Ω1). Instead, we take a direct approach, because an explicit description of H1(X,O) is
helpful for studying H1
dR(X) in Section 4.6. The following lemmas will be useful.
Lemma 4.2. For α ∈ B and j ∈ Z, the divisor of poles on X of the function yx−j
α = y(x − α)j is:
dβPβ.
div∞(y(x − α)j ) = max(dα − 2j, 0)Pα + max(j, 0)D∞ + Xβ∈B−{α}
Proof. Indeed, div(x − α) = 2Pα − D∞ for α ∈ B and
div∞(y) = Xβ∈B
dβPβ.
(cid:3)
Lemma 4.3. With notation as above:
Lemma 4.2 implies that y(x − α)j ∈ Γ(U ′,O) for all α ∈ B and j ∈ Z.
(i) Z1(U ,O) =(cid:10)ϕβ((x − α)j ), ϕβ(y(x − α)j) α, β ∈ B, j ∈ Z(cid:11).
(ii) If α ∈ B, then (cid:10)ϕα(y(x − β)j) j ≥ 0(cid:11) =(cid:10)ϕα(y(x − α)j ) j ≥ 0(cid:11) as subspaces of Z1(U ,O)
for each β ∈ B.
Proof.
(i) This is immediate from Equation (4.1) because
Z1(U ,O) = Mβ∈B(cid:10)ϕβ(h) h ∈ Γ(U ′,O)(cid:11).
(ii) Both are equal to the subspace {ϕα(yh(x)) h(x) ∈ k[x]}.
(cid:3)
Lemma 4.4. Let α ∈ B and j ∈ Z. Then:
(i) ϕβ((x − α)j ) ∈ B1(U ,O) for all β ∈ B∞.
(ii) ϕα(y(x − α)j ) ∈ B1(U ,O) if j > cα.
(iii) ϕ∞(y(x − α)j) ∈ B1(U ,O) if j ≤ 0.
8
Proof.
(i) Suppose that β ∈ B. If β 6= α or if j ≥ 0, then (x − α)j is regular at Pβ and so
ϕβ((x − α)j) ∈ B1(U ,O) by Lemma 4.1. For j ≥ 0, it follows from this and Equation (4.2)
that the cocycle ϕ∞((x − α)j) = −Pβ∈B ϕβ((x − α)j ) is a coboundary. If j < 0, then
ϕ∞((x − α)j) ∈ B1(U ,O) by Lemma 4.1.
Finally, if β = α 6= ∞ and j < 0, then (x − α)j ∈ Γ(Uγ,O) for all γ ∈ B∞ − {α}. By
Equation (4.2),
ϕα((x − α)j) = − Xγ∈B∞−{α}
ϕγ(cid:0)(x − α)j(cid:1) = − Xγ∈B∞−{α}
δψγ((x − α)j),
which is a coboundary.
(ii) If j > cα, then y(x − α)j ∈ Γ(Uα,O) and ϕα(y(x − α)j) = δψα(y(x − α)j).
(iii) If j ≤ 0, then y(x − α)j ∈ Γ(U∞,O), and ϕ∞(y(x − α)j) = δψ∞(y(x − α)j ).
(4.4)
(cid:3)
Consider the cocycles φα,j ∈ Z1(U ,O) for α ∈ B and j ∈ Z defined by
φα,j := ϕα(y(x − α)j).
Given φ ∈ Z1(U ,O), denote by φ the cohomology class of φ in H1(U ,O). For α ∈ B∞, define the
map
ϕα : Γ(U ′,O) → H1(U ,O),
f 7→ ϕα(f ) mod B1(U ,O).
The following lemma is a variant of a special case of [15, Lemma 6].
Lemma 4.5. A basis for H1(U ,O) is given by the cohomology classes φα,j for α ∈ B and 1 ≤ j ≤ cα,
and φα,0 for α ∈ B′.
Proof. The set of cohomology classes S = { φα,j α ∈ B, 1 ≤ j ≤ cα} ∪ { φα,0 α ∈ B′} has
cardinality r +Pα∈B cα = g. By Lemmas 4.3(i) and 4.4(i), it suffices to show that ϕβ(y(x − α)j )
is in the span of S for α, β ∈ B and j ∈ Z. By Lemmas 4.3(ii) and 4.4(ii), it suffices to show that
the span of S contains φ0,0 and ϕβ(y(x − α)−j ) for α, β ∈ B and j > 0.
The cocycle ϕ∞(y) is a coboundary by Lemmas 4.1 and 4.2. Using this and Equation (4.2), one
computes in H1(U ,O) that
φ0,0 = ϕ0(y) + ϕ∞(y) = − Xβ∈B′
ϕβ(y) = − Xβ∈B′
φβ,0,
which is in the span of S.
Now consider ϕβ(y(x− α)−j) for α, β ∈ B and j > 0. If r = 0, then this cocycle is a coboundary
by Equation (4.2) and Lemma 4.4(iii). Let r > 0 and first suppose that α 6= β. After a change of
coordinates, one can assume without loss of generality that α = 0 and β = 1. For i ≥ 1, let bi ∈ k
be such that:
Then
x − 1 (cid:19)j
bixi :=(cid:18) 1 − xc0+1
.
Xi≥0
y
(x − 1)j −Xi≥0
biyxi =
=
9
y(1 − (1 − xc0+1)j)
(x − 1)j
yxc0+1h(x)
(x − 1)j
for some polynomial h(x) ∈ k[x]. The latter function is regular at P0 by Lemma 4.2. Therefore, the
cocycle φ := ϕ0(yxc0+1h(x)/(x − 1)j) is a coboundary by Lemma 4.4(ii). Using this and Lemma
4.4(ii) yields that
ϕ0(y(x − 1)−j ) = Xi≥0
Xi=0
=
c0
bi ϕ0(yxi) + ϕ0(yxc0+1h(x)/(x − 1)j )
bi φ0,i,
(In the general case, the cohomology class ϕβ(y(x − α)−j ) can be
If α = β and j > 0, one can add the coboundary ϕ∞(y(x − α)−j ) to ϕα(y(x − α)−j) and use
which is in the span of S.
expressed using the Laurent expansion of 1/(x − α)j at β truncated at degree cα.)
Equation (4.2) to see that
ϕα(y(x − α)−j) = − Xγ∈B−{α}
ϕγ(y(x − α)−j),
which reduces the proof to the previous case.
The next lemma is important for describing the F -module structure of H1(U ,O).
Lemma 4.6. If α ∈ B and j ≥ 0, then
F φα,j =( φα,2j
0
if 2j ≤ cα,
otherwise.
Proof. Since (F φα,j)βγ = (φα,j)2
βγ, one computes that
(y(x − α)j )2 = (y + f (x))(x − α)2j
= y(x − α)2j + f (x)(x − α)2j.
The statement follows from the definition of φα,j and Lemma 4.4(i).
Now define
(cid:3)
(cid:3)
α,ss
:= (cid:10) φα,0(cid:11)
:= (cid:10) φα,j 1 ≤ j ≤ cα(cid:11)
Lemma 4.7. The subspaces W ′′
for each α ∈ B. There is an isomorphism of F -modules:
α,ss and W ′′
W ′′
W ′′
α,nil
for α ∈ B′, and
for α ∈ B.
α,nil of H1(U ,O) are stable under the action of Frobenius
H1(U ,O) ≃ Mα∈B′
W ′′
α,ss ⊕Mα∈B
W ′′
α,nil.
Proof. This follows immediately from Lemmas 4.5 and 4.6.
4.4. Auxiliary map. The next goal is to define a section σ : H1(X,O) → H1
dR(X). To do this, the
first step will be to define a homomorphism ρ : Z1(U ,O) → C0(U , Ω1) by defining its components
ρα : Z1(U ,O) → Γ(Uβ, Ω1) for α, β ∈ B. Given φ ∈ Z1(U ,O) and α ∈ B, the idea is to separate dφ
into two parts: the first part will be regular at Pα and thus belong to Γ(Uα, Ω1); the second part
will be regular away from Pα and hence belong to Γ(Uβ, Ω1) for every β 6= α.
Notation 4.8. Define the truncation operator Θ≥i : k[x, x−1] → k[x, x−1] by
(cid:3)
Θ≥i(cid:16)Xj
ajxj(cid:17) :=Xj≥i
10
ajxj.
Operators Θ>i, Θ≤i, Θ<i : k[x, x−1] → k[x, x−1] can be defined analogously. These operators can
also be defined on k[xα, x−1
α ], then
let Θ≥i(m(xα)) denote Θ≥i(m(x))x=xα.
α ]. To clarify some ambiguity in notation, if m(xα) ∈ k[xα, x−1
Recall that xα := (x − α)−1, and so φα,j = ϕα(yx−j
d(yx−j
α ) = −jx−j−1
α
α ). Then
y dxα + x−j
α dy.
Using partial fractions and the fact that dy = −d(f (x)), one sees that
In light of these facts, consider the following definition.
dy = −Xβ∈B
f ′
β(xβ) dxβ.
(4.5)
(4.6)
Notation 4.9. For α ∈ B and j ≥ 0, define
Rα,j
Sα,j
:= Θ≥0(cid:16)x−j
:= d(yx−j
α f ′
α(xα)(cid:17) dxα;
α ) + Rα,j.
Remark 4.10. Let aα,i ∈ k be the coefficients of the (odd-power) monomials of the polynomials
fα(xα) defined in the partial fraction decomposition (1.1):
Then
fα(xα) =
aα,ix2i+1
α
.
cα
Xi=0
Rα,j = Xj/2≤i≤cα
= Xj/2≤i≤cα
aα,ix2i−j
α
dxα
aα,iωα,2i−j+1.
Lemma 4.11. Let α ∈ B and j ≥ 0.
(1) The differential form Rα,j is regular away from Pα, i.e., Rα,j ∈ Γ(Uβ, Ω1) for all β ∈
(2) The differential form Sα,j is regular at Pα for 0 ≤ j ≤ cα, i.e., Sα,j ∈ Γ(Uα, Ω1).
B∞ − {α}
Proof.
(1) This follows from Remark 4.10 and Equation (3.2).
(2) By Notation 4.8, Notation 4.9 and Equations (4.5) and (4.6),
α ) + Θ≥0(x−j
α f ′
α(xα)) dxα
Sα,j = d(yx−j
= −jx−j−1
α
α f ′
y dxα − Θ<0(x−j
α(xα)) dxα − Xβ∈B−{α}
x−j
α f ′
β(xβ) dxβ
(4.7)
(4.8)
For the first part of Equation (4.8), note that the order of vanishing of x−j−1
α
y dxα at Pα
For the second part of Equation (4.8), note that Θ<0(x−j
α k[x−1
α ].
α(xα)) has a zero of order at least 2 at Pα. As seen in the proof of Lemma
is 2dα − 1 + 2j by Lemma 4.2 and Equation (3.1), and so this term is regular at Pα.
α(xα)) is contained in x−1
Thus Θ<0(x−j
3.1, dxα has a zero of order dα − 3 at Pα. Thus Θ<0(x−j
α f ′
The last part of Equation (4.8) is regular at Pα since x−1
Pα.
α(xα)) dxα is regular at Pα.
α and f ′
β(xβ) dxβ are regular at
α f ′
α f ′
11
(cid:3)
4.5. Definition of ρ. We define a k-linear morphism
ρ : Z1(U ,O) → C0(U , Ω1)
as follows.
4.5.1. Definition of ρ on B1(U ,O): If φ ∈ B1(U ,O), then φ = δκ for some κ ∈ C0(U ,O). Define
ρ(φ) := dκ,
with differentiation performed component-wise. This map is well-defined, since if κ is regular at
P ∈ X(k), then so is dκ. Moreover, if κ′ is another element such that φ = δκ′, then δ(κ − κ′) = 0
and therefore κ − κ′ ∈ H0(U ,O) is constant and annihilated by d. Let ρβ(φ) denote (ρ(φ))β.
It follows from the definition that C (ρ(B1(U ,O))) = 0, since the Cartier operator annihilates all
exact differential forms. Explicitly, the map ρ is computed as follows.
Lemma 4.12.
(i) If α ∈ B∞ and h ∈ Γ(Uα,O), then ρϕα(hU ′) = dψα(h).
(ii) If α ∈ B and j ≤ 0, then
ρϕα((x − α)j) = − Xγ∈B∞−{α}
dψγ((x − α)j).
Proof. Part (i) is immediate from the definition of the map ρ and Lemma 4.1.
Part (ii) follows from part (i), Equation (4.4) and the definition of ρ.
(cid:3)
Example 4.13. The value of ρ on the 1-coboundary ϕα(f (x)x−j
α ) if α ∈ B and j ≥ 0: Let
rα,j := Θ>0(cid:0)x−j
α fα(xα)(cid:1) and sα,j := Θ≤0(cid:0)x−j
α fα(xα)(cid:1) +Xβ6=α
x−j
α fβ(xβ).
Then
and rα,j has a pole at Pα, but is regular everywhere else, while sα,j is regular at Pα. Thus,
f (x)x−j
α = rα,j + sα,j,
ϕα(f (x)x−j
α ) = δψα(sα,j) − Xβ∈B∞−{α}
δψβ(rα,j).
simplifies to
Therefore, for β 6= α, by Lemma 4.12, ρβϕα(f (x)x−j
α ) =(−Rα,j
ρβϕα(f (x)x−j
0
if j is even,
if j is odd.
α ) = −d(rα,j). Since fα(xα) ∈ xαk[x2
α], this
Similarly,
(4.9)
(4.10)
4.5.2. Definition of ρβ on Z1(U ,O): By Lemma 4.5, Z1(U ,O) is generated by B1(U ,O) and φα,j
for α ∈ B and 0 ≤ j ≤ cα. For α, β ∈ B, define
ραϕα(f (x)x−j
α ) =(−Sα,j
d(cid:0)f (x)x−j
α (cid:1)
if j is even,
if j is odd.
ρβ(φα,j) =(Rα,j
Sα,j
if β 6= α,
if β = α,
and extend ρβ to Z1(U ,O) linearly. For all β ∈ B − {α}, note that
ρα(φα,j) = d(yx−j
α ) + ρβ(φα,j).
12
Lemma 4.14. There is a well-defined map ρ : Z1(U ,O) → C0(U , Ω1) given by
ρ := Mβ∈B∞
ρβ.
Proof. If β ∈ B∞, then ρβ(Z1(U ,O)) ⊂ Γ(Uβ, Ω1) by Section 4.5.1 and Lemma 4.11.
(cid:3)
Here is an example of a computation of the map ρ.
Lemma 4.15. Let α ∈ B and j ≥ 0. For each β ∈ B, in Γ(Uβ, Ω1),
if 0 ≤ 2j ≤ cα,
if 2j > cα.
α,nil of H0(U , Ω1).
α , and therefore ϕα(y2x−2j
In particular, ρϕα(y2x−2j
α ) lies in the subspace W ′
α ) =(0
Proof. We have y2x−2j
α + f (x)x−2j
ρβϕα(y2x−2j
α = yx−2j
−Rα,2j
α ) = φα,2j + ϕα(f (x)x−2j
α ).
Suppose 0 ≤ 2j ≤ cα. If β 6= α, then ρβ(φα,2j) = Rα,2j = −ρβ(ϕα(f (x)x−2j
Now, suppose that 2j > cα. Then yx−2j
By Equation (4.10), ρα(φα,2j) = Sα,2j = −ρα(ϕα(f (x)x−2j
with ρ(φα,2j) = dϕα(yx2j
α )) by Equation (4.9).
α )) = 0.
is regular at Pα and therefore φα,2j is a coboundary,
α )). Thus, ρ(φα,2j )+ρ(ϕα(f (x)x−2j
α
α ). Therefore, for β 6= α,
ρβ(φα,2j) + ρβ(ϕα(f (x)x−2j
α )) = −Rα,2j,
and
ρα(φα,2j) + ρα(ϕα(f (x)x−2j
α )) = d(yx−2j
α ) + d(f (x)x−2j
α ) − Rα,2j = −Rα,2j.
By Remark 4.10, Rα,2j ∈ hωα,2i−2j+1 j ≤ i ≤ cαi. If 2j > cα and j ≤ i ≤ cα, then 1 ≤ 2i − 2j +
α ) is independent of the choice of β ∈ B∞,
α,nil. Finally, since ρβϕα(y2x−2j
α ) lies in the kernel H0(U , Ω1) of the coboundary map δ : C 0(U , Ω1) → C 1(U , Ω1).
1 ≤ cα, and so Rα,2j ∈ W ′
ρϕα(y2x−2j
(cid:3)
Lemma 4.16.
(i) If φ ∈ Z1(U ,O), then δρ(φ) = dφ.
(ii) In particular, C (ρα(φ)) = C (ρβ(φ)) for all α, β ∈ B∞.
(iii) For all α ∈ B and β ∈ B∞,
C (ρβ(φα,j)) = C (Rα,j).
Proof.
(i) The definition of ρβ implies that ρα(φ) − ρβ(φ) = d(φ)αβ for all α, β ∈ B∞.
(ii) This follows from part (i) since the Cartier operator annihilates exact differential forms.
(iii) This follows from part (ii) and the definition of ρβ.
Remark 4.17. With aα,i defined as in Remark 4.10, one can explicitly compute:
(cid:3)
C (Rα,j) =(Pcα
0
i=(j+1)/2 √aα,i ωα,i−(j−1)/2
if j is odd,
if j is even.
In particular, C (Rα,j) ∈ W ′
4.6. The E-module structure of the de Rham cohomology. Recall, from Section 2.3, the
definition of the non-commutative ring E = k[F, V ] and the exact sequence:
α,nil.
0 → H0(X, Ω1)
λ
−→ H1
dR(X)
γ
−→ H1(X,O) → 0.
Consider the k-linear function
defined by σ(φ) = (φ, ρ(φ)) for φ ∈ Z1(U ,O).
Lemma 4.18. The function σ is a well-defined section of γ : H1
σ : H1(X,O) → H1
dR(X)
13
dR(X) → H1(X,O).
Proof. The function σ is clearly a section of γ. It is well-defined because σ(B1(U ,O)) ⊂ B1
the definition of ρβ on B1(U ,O).
dR(U ) by
(cid:3)
For α ∈ B, let λα,j := λ(ωα,j) and σα,j := σ( φα,j ).
Proposition 4.19. For 0 ≤ j ≤ cα, the action of F and V on H1
dR(X) is given by:
(1) F λα,j = 0.
0
(2) V λα,j =(λα,j/2
(3) F σα,j =(σα,2j
(4) V σα,j =(λ(C (Rα,j))
λ(Rα,2j)
0
if j is even,
if j is odd.
if j ≤ cα/2,
if j > cα/2.
if j is odd,
if j is even.
Proof.
(1) This follows from Subsection 2.4.
(2) This follows from Lemma 3.2 after applying λ.
(3) In Z1
dR(U ),
F (σα,j) = (cid:0)F φα,j, 0(cid:1)
= (cid:0)ϕα(y2x−2j
= σϕα(y2x−2j
α ), ρϕα(y2x−2j
α ) −(cid:0)0, ρϕα(y2x−2j
α )(cid:1).
α )(cid:1) −(cid:0)0, ρϕα(y2x−2j
α )(cid:1)
Since y2x−2j
α = yx−2j
α + f (x)x−2j
α , linearity of σ and ϕα yields that
σϕα(y2x−2j
α ) = σϕα(yx−2j
α ) + σϕα(cid:0)f (x)x−2j
α (cid:1).
The term σϕα(f (x)x−2j
σα,2j if 0 ≤ 2j ≤ cα, and is a coboundary if 2j > cα by Lemma 4.4(ii). By Lemma 4.15,
α ) is a coboundary by Lemma 4.4(i). The term σϕα(yx−2j
α ) equals
(cid:0)0, ρϕα(y2x−2j
α )(cid:1) =(0
−λ(Rα,2j)
if 0 ≤ 2j ≤ cα,
if 2j > cα.
(4) Since V (φ, ρ(φ)) = (0, C (ρ(φ))), the desired result follows by Lemma 4.16(iii).
Consider the subspaces of H1
dR(X) given by:
(cid:3)
Wα,ss
Wα,nil
:= (cid:10)λα,0 − λ0,0, σα,0(cid:11),
:= (cid:10)λα,j, σα,j 1 ≤ j ≤ cα(cid:11).
Theorem 4.20. The subspaces Wα,ss and Wα,nil of H1
and Verschiebung for each α ∈ B. There is an isomorphism of E-modules:
dR(X) are stable under the action of Frobenius
H1
dR(X) = Mα∈B′
Wα,ss ⊕Mα∈B
Wα,nil.
Proof. The stability is immediate by Proposition 4.19, Remark 4.10, and Lemma 4.15. The decom-
position follows from Corollary 4.18 and Lemmas 3.3 and 4.7.
(cid:3)
Theorem 1.2 is immediate from Theorem 4.20.
14
5. Results on the Ekedahl-Oort type
For a natural number c, let Gc be the unique symmetric BT1 group scheme of rank p2c with
Ekedahl-Oort type [0, 1, 1, 2, 2, . . . ,⌊c/2⌋]. In other words, this means that there is a final filtration
N1 ⊂ N2 ⊂ ··· ⊂ N2c of D(Gc) as a k-vector space, which is stable under the action of V and F −1
and with i = dim(Ni), such that dim(V (Ni)) = ⌊i/2⌋. In Section 5.1, we prove that group schemes
of the form Gc appear in the decomposition of JX [2] when X is a hyperelliptic k-curve. In Section
5.2, we describe the Dieudonn´e module of Gc for arbitrary c and give examples.
5.1. The final filtration for hyperelliptic curves in characteristic 2. Suppose X is a hyper-
elliptic k-curve with affine equation y2 − y = f (x) as described in Notation 1.1. For α ∈ B, recall
that cα = (dα − 1)/2, where dα is the ramification invariant of X above α. Recall the subspaces
Wα,nil of H1
dR(X) from Section 4.6. Define subspaces Nα,i of Wα,nil for 0 ≤ i ≤ 2cα as follows:
Nα,0 := {0} and
if 1 ≤ i ≤ cα,
if cα + 1 ≤ i ≤ 2cα.
Nα,cα ⊕(cid:10)σα,j 1 ≤ j ≤ i(cid:11)
Nα,i :=((cid:10)λα,j 1 ≤ j ≤ i(cid:11)
Proposition 5.1. The filtration Nα,0 ⊂ Nα,1 ⊂ Nα,2 ⊂ ··· ⊂ Nα,2cα is a final filtration of Wα,nil
for each α ∈ B. Furthermore, V (Nα,i) = Nα,⌊i/2⌋.
Proof. Let 0 ≤ i ≤ 2cα. One sees that dim(Nα,i) = i. By Proposition 4.19, V (Nα,i) = Nα,⌊i/2⌋ and
F −1(Nα,i) = Nα,cα+⌈i/2⌉. Thus the filtration Nα,0 ⊂ Nα,1 ⊂ Nα,2 ⊂ ··· ⊂ Nα,2cα is stable under
the action of V and F −1.
Theorem 5.2. Suppose X is a hyperelliptic k-curve with affine equation y2− y = f (x) as described
in Notation 1.1. Then the 2-torsion group scheme of X decomposes as
(cid:3)
JX [2] ≃ (Z/2 ⊕ µ2)r ⊕Mα∈B
Gcα,
H1
dR(X) = Mα∈B′
Wα,ss ⊕Mα∈B
Wα,nil.
and the a-number of X is aX = (g + 1 − #{α ∈ B dα ≡ 1 mod 4})/2.
Proof. By [18, Section 5], there is an isomorphism of E-modules between the Dieudonn´e module
D(JX [2]) and the de Rham cohomology H1
dR(X). By Theorem 4.20, there is an isomorphism of
E-modules:
If α ∈ B′, then Wα,ss is isomorphic to E/E(F, 1 − V ) ⊕ E/E(V, 1 − F ) ≃ D(Z/2 ⊕ µ2). Finally,
Proposition 5.1 shows that Wα,nil ≃ D(Gcα), which completes the proof of the statement about
JX [2]. The statement about aX can be found in Proposition 3.4.
(cid:3)
As a corollary, we highlight the special case when r = 0 (i.e., f (x) ∈ k[x]). Corollary 5.3 is stated
without proof in [25, 3.2].
Corollary 5.3. Let X be a hyperelliptic k-curve of genus g and p-rank r = 0. Then the Ekedahl-
Oort type of JX[2] is [0, 1, 1, 2, 2, . . . ,⌊g/2⌋] and the a-number is aX = ⌊(g + 1)/2⌋.
Proof. This is a special case of Theorem 5.2 where #B = 1.
(cid:3)
The next result is included to emphasize that Theorem 5.2 gives a complete classification of the
2-torsion group schemes which occur as JX [2] when X is a hyperelliptic k-curve.
Corollary 5.4. Let G be a symmetric BT1 group scheme of rank p2g. Let 0 ≤ r ≤ g. Then
G ≃ JX [2] for some hyperelliptic k-curve X of genus g and p-rank r if and only if there exist
c1, . . . , cr+1 ∈ N ∪ {0} such that Pr+1
i=1 ci = g − r and such that
G ≃ (Z/2 ⊕ µ2)r ⊕Mα∈B
Gcα.
15
Proof. This is immediate from Theorem 5.2.
(cid:3)
Remark 5.5. For fixed g, the number of isomorphism classes of symmetric BT1 group schemes
of rank p2g that occur as JX [2] for some hyperelliptic k-curve X of genus g equals the number of
partitions of g + 1. To see this, note that the isomorphism class of JX[2] is determined by the multi-
i=1 (di + 1) = 2g + 2. So the number of isomorphism
set {d1, . . . , dr+1} where di = 2ci + 1 and Pr+1
classes equals the number of partitions of 2g + 2 into even integers.
Remark 5.6. The examples in Section 5.2 show that the factors appearing in the decomposition
of JX[2] in Theorem 5.2 may not be indecomposable as symmetric BT1 group schemes.
5.2. Description of a particular Ekedahl-Oort type. Recall that Gc is the unique symmet-
ric BT1 group scheme of rank p2c with Ekedahl-Oort type [0, 1, 1, 2, 2, . . . ,⌊c/2⌋]. Recall that
E = k[F, V ] is the non-commutative ring defined in Section 2.3. In this section, we describe the
Dieudonn´e module D(Gc). We start with some examples to motivate the notation. The examples
show that Gc is sometimes indecomposable and sometimes decomposes into symmetric BT1 group
schemes of smaller rank. The first four examples were found using pre-existing tables.
Example 5.7.
(1) For c = 1, the Ekedahl-Oort type is [0]. This Ekedahl-Oort type occurs for
the p-torsion group scheme of a supersingular elliptic curve. See [10, Ex. A.3.14] or [20, Ex.
2.3] for a description of G1. It has Dieudonn´e module E/E(F + V ).
(2) For c = 2, the Ekedahl-Oort type is [0, 1]. This Ekedahl-Oort type occurs for the p-torsion
group scheme of a supersingular abelian surface which is not superspecial. See [10, Ex.
A.3.15] or [20, Ex. 2.3] for a description of G2. It has Dieudonn´e module E/E(F 2 + V 2).
(3) For c = 3, the Ekedahl-Oort type is [0, 1, 1]. This Ekedahl-Oort type occurs for an abelian
threefold with p-rank 0 and a-number 2 whose p-torsion is indecomposable as a symmetric
BT1 group scheme. By [20, Lemma 3.4], G3 has Dieudonn´e module
E/E(F 2 + V ) ⊕ E/E(V 2 + F ).
(4) For c = 4, the Ekedahl-Oort type is [0, 1, 1, 2]. This Ekedahl-Oort type occurs for an
abelian fourfold with p-rank 0 and a-number 2 whose p-torsion decomposes as a direct sum
of symmetric BT1 group schemes of rank p2 and p6. By [20, Table 4.4], G4 has Dieudonn´e
module
E/E(F + V ) ⊕ E/E(F 3 + V 3).
We now provide an algorithm to determine the Dieudonn´e module D(Gc) for all c ∈ N following
the method of [19, Section 9.1].
Proposition 5.8. The Dieudonn´e module D(Gc) is the E-module generated as a k-vector space by
{X1, . . . , Xc, Y1, . . . , Yc} with the actions of F and V given by:
(1) F (Yj) = 0.
if j ≤ c/2,
if j > c/2.
0
(2) V (Yj) =(Y2j
(3) F (Xi) =(Xj/2
(4) V (Xj) =(0
Yc−(j−1)/2
−Y2c−2j+1
if j is even,
if j is odd.
if j ≤ (c − 1)/2,
if j > (c − 1)/2.
Proof. By definition of Gc, there is a final filtration N1 ⊂ N2 ⊂ ··· ⊂ N2c of D(Gc) as a k-
vector space, which is stable under the action of V and F −1 and with i = dim(Ni), such that
16
νi := dim(V (Ni)) = ⌊i/2⌋. This implies that νi = νi−1 if and only if i is odd. In the notation of
[19, Section 9.1], this yields mi = 2i and ni = 2g − 2i + 1 for 1 ≤ i ≤ g; also, let
Zi =(Xi/2
Yc−(i−1)/2
if i is even,
if i is odd.
By [19, Section 9.1], for 1 ≤ i ≤ g, the action of F is given by F (Yi) = 0 and F (Xi) = Zi; and the
action of V is given by V (Zi) = 0 and V (Z2g−i+1) = (−1)i−1Yi.
(cid:3)
More notation is needed to give an explicit description of D(Gc).
Notation 5.9. Let c ∈ N be fixed. Let I = {j ∈ N ⌈(c + 1)/2⌉ ≤ j ≤ c} which is a set of
cardinality ⌊(c + 1)/2⌋. For j ∈ I, let ℓ(j) be the odd part of j and let e(j) be the non-negative
integer such that j = 2e(j)ℓ(j). Let s(j) = c − (ℓ(j) − 1)/2. One can check that {s(j) j ∈ I} = I.
Also, let m(j) = 2c− 2j + 1 and let ǫ(j) be the non-negative integer such that t(j) := 2ǫ(j)m(j) ∈ I.
One can check that {t(j) j ∈ I} = I. Thus there is a unique bijection ι : I → I such that
t(ι(j)) = s(j) for each j ∈ I.
Proposition 5.10. Recall Notation 5.9. For c ∈ N, the set {Xj j ∈ I} generates the Dieudonn´e
module D(Gc) as an E-module subject to the relations: F e(j)+1(Xj) + V ǫ(ι(j))+1(Xι(j)) for j ∈ I.
Also, {Xj j ∈ I} is a basis for D(Gc) modulo D(Gc)(F, V ).
Proof. By Proposition 5.8, F e(j)(Xj) = Xℓ(j) and F (Xℓ(j)) = Ys(j). Also, V (Xj) = −Ym(j) and
so V ǫ(j)+1(Xj) = −Yt(j). This yields the stated relations. To complete the first claim, it suffices
to show that the span of {Xj
j ∈ I} under the action of F and V contains the k-module
generators of D(Cc) listed in Proposition 5.8. This follows from the observations that Xi = F (X2i)
if 1 ≤ i ≤ ⌊c/2⌋, that Yi = V (Yi/2) if i is even and Yi = V (−Xc−(i−1)/2) if i is odd. By [14, 5.2.8],
the dimension of D(Gc) modulo D(Gc)(F, V ) equals the a-number. Since a = I by Corollary 5.3,
it follows that the set I of generators of D(Gc) is linearly independent modulo D(Gc)(F, V ). (cid:3)
Here are some more examples. The columns of the following table list: the value of c; the
generators of D(Gc) as an E-module (where Xi1 − Xi2 denotes {Xi i1 ≤ i ≤ i2}); the relations
among these generators; and the number of (possibly unsymmetric) indecomposable summands of
D(Gc). The table can be verified in two ways: first, by checking it with Proposition 5.10; second,
by computing the action of F and V on a k-basis for D(Gc), using this to construct a final filtration
of D(Gc) stable under V and F −1, and then checking that it matches the Ekedahl-Oort type of Gc.
In Example 5.11, we illustrate the second method.
c
generators
5 X3 − X5
6 X4 − X6
7 X4 − X7
8 X5 − X8
9 X5 − X9
10 X6 − X10 F 2X6 + V X6, F X7 + V X7, F 4X8 + V 2X8,
relations
F X3 + V 3X5, F 3X4 + V X3, F X5 + V X4
F 3X4 + V 2X5, F X5 + V 3X6, F 2X6 + V X4
F 3X4 + V X4, F X5 + V X5, F 2X6 + V 2X6, F X7 + V 3X7
F X5 + V 2X7, F 2X6 + V X5, F X7 + V X6, F 4X8 + V 4X8
F X5 + V X6, F 2X6 + V 4X9, F X7 + V 2X8,
F 4X8 + V X5, F X9 + V X7
F X9 + V 2X9, F 2X10 + V 4X10
# summands
1
1
4
2
1
5
Example 5.11. For c = 7, the group scheme G7 with Ekedahl-Oort type [0, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3] is iso-
morphic to a direct sum of symmetric BT1 group schemes of ranks p2, p4 and p8 and has Dieudonn´e
module
M := E/E(F + V ) ⊕ E/E(F 2 + V 2) ⊕ E/E(V + F 3) ⊕ E/E(F 3 + V ).
17
Proof. Let {1A, VA} be the basis of the submodule A = E/E(F + V ) of M; let (cid:8)1B, VB, V 2
the basis of the submodule B = E/E(F 2 + V 2); let (cid:8)1C , VC, V 2
C = E/E(F + V 3); and let (cid:8)1C ′, FC ′, F 2
B(cid:9) be
C(cid:9) be the basis of the submodule
C ′(cid:9) be the basis of the submodule C ′ = E/E(F 3 + V ).
The action of Frobenius and Verschiebung on the elements of these bases is:
C ′, F 3
C , V 3
B, F 2
x
V x VA
F x VA
B FB 1C VC V 2
1A VA 1B VB V 2
C V 3
C V 3
VC V 2
0
C
0
0
0
VB V 2
B
0
0
0 FB
0
V 2
B V 3
C
C ′ F 3
C 1C ′ FC ′ F 2
C ′
0 F 3
0
0
0
C ′
C ′ F 3
0 FC ′ F 2
0
C ′
To verify the proposition, one can repeatedly apply V and F −1 to construct a filtration N1 ⊂
N2 ⊂ ··· ⊂ N14 of M as a k-vector space which is stable under the action of V and F −1 such that
i = dim(Ni). To save space, we summarize the calculation by listing a generator ti for Ni/Ni−1:
i
1
2
3
6
9
C ′ VB 1C F 2
ti V 3
C V 2
C V 2
B VC VA F 3
C ′
4
5
7
8
11
10
12
1A FB FC ′
13
1C ′
14
1B
Then one can check that V (Ni) = N⌊i/2⌋ and F −1(Ni) = N7+⌈i/2⌉, which verifies that the
(cid:3)
Ekedahl-Oort type of M is [0, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3].
Remark 5.12. One could ask when D(Gc) decomposes as much as numerically possible, in other
words, when the number of (possibly unsymmetric) indecomposable summands of D(Gc) equals the
a-number. For example, D(Gc) has this property when c ∈ {1−4, 7, 10} but not when c ∈ {5, 6, 8, 9}.
This phenomenon occurs if and only if the bijection ι from Notation 5.9 is the identity.
Remark 5.13. The group scheme G8 decomposes as the direct sum of two indecomposable sym-
metric BT1 group schemes, one whose Ekedahl-Oort type is [0, 0, 1, 1], and the other whose covariant
Dieudonn´e module is E/E(F 4 + V 4). We take this opportunity to note that there is a mistake in
[20, Example in Section 3.3]. The covariant Dieudonn´e module of I4,3 = [0, 0, 1, 1] is stated incor-
rectly. To fix it, consider the method of [19, Section 9.1]. Consider the k-vector space of dimension
8 generated by X1, . . . , X4 and Y1, . . . Y4. Consider the operation F defined by: F (Yi) = 0 for
1 ≤ i ≤ 4 and
F (X1) = Y4; F (X2) = Y3; F (X3) = X1; F (X4) = Y2.
Consider the operation V defined by:
and
V (X1) = 0; V (X2) = −Y4; V (X3) = −Y2; V (X4) = −Y1;
Thus D(I4,3) is generated by X2, X3, X4 modulo the relations
V (Y1) = Y3; V (Y2) = 0; V (Y3) = 0; V (Y4) = 0.
F X2 + V 2X4, F 2X3 + V X2, V X3 + F X4.
5.3. Newton polygons. There are several results in characteristic 2 about the Newton polygons
of hyperelliptic (e.g., Artin-Schreier) curves X of genus g and 2-rank 0. For example, [2, Remark
3.2] states that if 2n−1 − 1 ≤ g ≤ 2n − 2, then the generic first slope of the Newton polygon of an
Artin-Schreier curve of genus g and 2-rank 0 is 1/n. This statement is made more precise in [1,
Thm. 4.3]. See also earlier work in [21, Thm. 1.1(III)].
The Ekedahl-Oort type of JX [2] gives information about the Newton polygon of X, but does not
determine it completely. Using Corollary 5.3 and [11, Section 3.1, Theorem 4.1], one can show that
the first slope of the Newton polygon of X is at least 1/n. Since this is weaker than [1, Thm. 4.3],
we do not include the details.
More generally, one could consider the case that X is a hyperelliptic k-curve of genus g and
arbitrary p-rank. One could use Theorem 5.2 to give partial information (namely a lower bound)
for the Newton polygon of X.
18
References
[1] R. Blache. First vertices for generic Newton polygons, and p-cyclic coverings of the projective line.
arXiv:0912.2051.
[2] R. Blache. p-density, exponential sums and Artin-Schreier curves. arXiv:0812.3382.
[3] W. Bosma, J. Cannon, and C. Playoust. The magma algebra system i: the user language. J. Symb. Comput.,
24(3-4):235 -- 265, 1997.
[4] I. Bouw. The p-rank of ramified covers of curves. Compositio Math., 126(3):295 -- 322, 2001.
[5] P Cartier. Une nouvelle op´eration sur les formes diff´erentielles. Lecture Notes Ser. Comput., 244:426 -- 428, 1957.
[6] R. Crew. ´Etale p-covers in characteristic p. Compositio Math., 52(1):31 -- 45, 1984.
[7] M. Demazure. Lectures on p-divisible groups, volume 302 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag,
Berlin, 1986. Reprint of the 1972 original.
[8] T. Ekedahl. On supersingular curves and abelian varieties. Math. Scand., 60(2):151 -- 178, 1987.
[9] A. Elkin. The rank of the Cartier operator on cyclic covers of the projective line. to appear in J. Algebra,
arXiv:0708.0431.
[10] E. Goren. Lectures on Hilbert modular varieties and modular forms, volume 14 of CRM Monograph Series.
American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002. With M.-H. Nicole.
[11] S. Harashita. Ekedahl-Oort strata and the first Newton slope strata. J. Algebraic Geom., 16(1):171 -- 199, 2007.
[12] O. Johnston. A note on the a-numbers and p-ranks of Kummer covers. arXiv:0710.2120.
[13] H. Kraft. Kommutative algebraische p-gruppen (mit anwendungen auf p-divisible gruppen und abelsche va-
rietaten). manuscript, University of Bonn, September 1975, 86 pp.
[14] K.-Z. Li and F. Oort. Moduli of supersingular abelian varieties, volume 1680 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998.
[15] D. Madden. Arithmetic in generalized Artin-Schreier extensions of k(x). J. Number Theory, 10(3):303 -- 323, 1978.
[16] B. Moonen. Group schemes with additional structures and Weyl group cosets. In Moduli of abelian varieties
(Texel Island, 1999), volume 195 of Progr. Math., pages 255 -- 298. Birkhauser, Basel, 2001.
[17] E. Nart and D. Sadornil. Hyperelliptic curves of genus three over finite fields of even characteristic. Finite Fields
Appl., 10(2):198 -- 220, 2004.
[18] T. Oda. The first de Rham cohomology group and Dieudonn´e modules. Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. (4), 2:63 -- 135,
1969.
[19] F. Oort. A stratification of a moduli space of abelian varieties. In Moduli of abelian varieties (Texel Island, 1999),
volume 195 of Progr. Math., pages 345 -- 416. Birkhauser, Basel, 2001.
[20] R. Pries. A short guide to p-torsion of abelian varieties in characteristic p. In Computational arithmetic geometry,
volume 463 of Contemp. Math., pages 121 -- 129. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2008. math.NT/0609658.
[21] J. Scholten and H. J. Zhu. Hyperelliptic curves in characteristic 2. Int. Math. Res. Not., (17):905 -- 917, 2002.
[22] J.-P. Serre. Corps Locaux. Hermann, 1968.
[23] H. Stichtenoth. Algebraic function fields and codes, volume 254 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-
Verlag, Berlin, second edition, 2009.
[24] F. Sullivan. p-torsion in the class group of curves with too many automorphisms. Arch. Math. (Basel), 26:253 -- 261,
1975.
[25] G. van der Geer. Cycles on the moduli space of abelian varieties. In Moduli of curves and abelian varieties,
Aspects Math., E33, pages 65 -- 89. Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1999. arXiv:alg-geom/9605011.
[26] N. Yui. On the Jacobian varieties of hyperelliptic curves over fields of characteristic p > 2. J. Algebra, 52(2):378 --
410, 1978.
Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
E-mail address: [email protected]
Department of Mathematics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
E-mail address: [email protected]
19
|
1212.1170 | 1 | 1212 | 2012-12-05T21:00:16 | Jet schemes and singularities of W^r_d(C) loci | [
"math.AG"
] | Kempf proved that the theta divisor of a smooth projective curve C has rational singularities. In this paper we estimate the dimensions of the jet schemes of the theta divisor and show that all these schemes are irreducible. In particular, we recover Kempf's theorem in this way. For general projective smooth curves, our method also gives a formula for the log canonical threshold of the pair (\pic^d(C), W^r_d(C)). | math.AG | math | JET SCHEMES AND SINGULARITIES OF W r
d (C) LOCI
ZHIXIAN ZHU
Abstract. Kempf proved that the theta divisor of a smooth projective curve C has
rational singularities. In this paper we estimate the dimensions of the jet schemes of the
theta divisor and show that all these schemes are irreducible. In particular, we recover
Kempf's theorem in this way. For general projective smooth curves, our method also
gives a formula for the log canonical threshold of the pair (Picd(C), W r
d (C)).
2
1
0
2
c
e
D
5
]
.
G
A
h
t
a
m
[
1
v
0
7
1
1
.
2
1
2
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
Introduction
Let k be an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero. Let C be a smooth
projective curve of genus g over k. Riemann's original problem was to determine the
order of vanishing of the theta function at a point in the Jacobian of C. His Singularity
Theorem says that for every line bundle L of degree g − 1 in the theta divisor Θ, the
multiplicity of Θ at L is h0(C, L).
Recall that W r
degree d with dim L ≥ r. The theta divisor Θ is W 0
tangent cone of W 0
result to the W 0
cone as follows. Let L be a point of W 0
cone TL(W 0
Moreover, the degree of PTL(W 0
coefficient
d (C) is the subscheme of Picd(C) parameterizing line bundles L of
g−1(C). Kempf [Kem] described the
d at every point. In particular, he generalized Riemann's multiplicity
d and its tangent
d (C), with d < g and l = dim H 0(L). The tangent
d (C) has rational singularities.
d (C)) as a subscheme of PH 0(C, K)∗ is the binomial
d locus. In his paper, he described the singularities of W 0
d (C)) has rational singularities and therefore W 0
l − 1(cid:19) =(cid:18)g − d + l − 1
(cid:18)h1(L)
l − 1
(cid:19).
Following the work of Riemann and Kempf, there has been much interest in the
singularities of general theta divisors. For instance, using vanishing theorems, Ein and
Lazarsfeld [EL] showed that if Θ ⊂ A is an irreducible theta divisor on an abelian variety,
then Θ is normal and has rational singularities.
In this paper we approach the study of the singularities of the Brill-Noether locus
W r
d (C) from the point of view of its jet schemes. The jet scheme Xm of a given scheme X
of finite type over k parameterizes m-jets on X, that is, morphisms Spec k[t]/(tm+1) → X.
Note that X0 = X and X1 is the total tangent space of X. For every m ≥ 0, we have a
morphism πm : Xm → X that maps an m-jet to the image of the closed point. The fiber
of πm at x ∈ X is denoted by Xm,x.
Key words and phrases. Brill-Noether Loci, log canonical threshold,
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 14E18; Secondary 14B05.
1
2
Z. Zhu
Let L be a point in Θ. By the definition of Picd(C), an element Lm ∈ Picd(C)m is
identified with a line bundle on C × Spec k[t]/t(m+1).
Using the description of the theta divisor as a determinantal variety, we partition
the scheme Θm,L into constructible subsets Cλ indexed by partitions λ of length h0(C, L)
with sum ≥ m + 1. Several invariants of Lm ∈ Θm,L are determined by the corresponding
partition λ. For instance, λ determines the dimension of the kernel of the truncation map
H 0(C × Spec k[t]/t(m+1), Lm) → H 0(C, L). In this way, λ determines for each j ≤ m the
dimension of the subspace of sections in H 0(L) that can be extended to sections of Lj,
where Lj is the image of Lm under the truncation map Picd(C)m → Picd(C)j.
Let us briefly describe the proof of Riemann's Singularity Theorem that we give using
jet schemes. Since the inequality multL Θ ≥ l := h0(L) follows from the determinantal
description of Θ, we focus on the opposite inequality. In order to show that multL Θ ≤ l,
it is enough to prove that Θl,L 6= Picg−1(C)l,L. If this is not the case, then the image of
Θl,L in Θ1,L = Picg−1(C)1,L is Θ1,L. Using the partition associated to any Ll ∈ Θl,L, we
show that if L1 is the image of Ll in Θ1,L, then the restriction map H 0(L1) → H 0(L) is
nonzero. On the other hand, we can identify L1 in Picg−1(C)1,L to a Cech cohomolgy class
in H 1(C, OC). Furthermore, the obstruction to lifting a section s ∈ H 0(C, L) to a section
of L1 can be described using the pairing
H 0(C, L) ⊗ H 1(C, OC) ν−→ H 1(C, L)
that is, s lifts if and only if ν(s ⊗ L1) = 0. Since the set of elements in H 1(C, OC) for
which there is a nonzero such s is of codimension one, this gives a contradiction, proving
that multL Θ ≤ l.
By estimating the dimension of the constructible subset Cλ of Θm,L for each partition
λ, we obtain the following result.
Theorem A. For every smooth projective curve C of genus g ≥ 3 over k, and every
integer m ≥ 1, we have dim(πΘ
m)−1(Θsing) = (g − 1)(m + 1) − 1 if C is a hyperelliptic
curve. For nonhyperelliptic curves, we have dim(πΘ
m)−1(Θsing) = (g − 1)(m + 1) − 2.
A theorem in [Mus1] describes complete intersection rational singularities in terms
of jet schemes. Applying that theorem, we recover Kempf's result that the theta divisor
has rational singularities. Similarly, as a corollary of Theorem 3.3 in [EMY], we deduce
that the theta divisor of a nonhyperelliptic curve has terminal singularities.
Using similar ideas, we are able to compute the dimensions of the jet schemes of
the Brill-Noether locus W r
d (C) for generic curves. Using Mustat¸a's formula from [Mus2]
describing the log canonical threshold in terms of dimensions of jet schemes, we obtain
the following formula for the log canonical threshold of the pair (Picd(C), W r
d (C)).
Theorem B. For a general projective smooth curve C of genus g, let L be a line bundle
of degree d with d ≤ g − 1 and l = h0(L). The log canonical threshold of (Picd(C), W r
d (C))
at L ∈ W r
d (C) is
lctL(Picd(C), W r
d (C)) = min
1≤i≤l−r(cid:26) (l + 1 − i)(g − d + l − i)
l + 1 − r − i
(cid:27) .
Jet schemes and singularities of W r
d (C) loci
3
Recall that one can locally define a map from Picd(C) to a matrix space such that
W r
d (C) is the pull back of a suitable generic determinantal variety. It follows from the above
theorem that for generic curves, the local log canonical threshold of (Picd(C), W r
d (C)) at
L is equal to the local log canonical threshold of that generic determinantal variety at
the image of L (for the formula for the log canonical threshold of a generic determinantal
variety, see Theorem 3.5.7. in [Doc]).
In light of Ein-Lazarsfeld's result for general principal polarizations on abelian va-
rieties, it would be interesting to understand in general the properties of the jet schemes
of such divisors. We also hope that in the future one could use the behavior of the jet
schemes of the Brill-Noether loci to distinguish other geometric properties of curves.
The paper is organized as follows. In the first section, we review some basic defini-
tions and notation related to the jet schemes and the Brill-Noether loci. We give a criterion
on the partition λ associated to Lm ∈ Picg−1(C)m to have Lm ∈ Θm. We also prove the
formula for h0(Lm) in terms of the partition λ associated to Lm. As a first application, we
give the proof of Riemann's multiplicity formula that we sketched above. In the second
section, we prove Theorems A and B by estimating the dimensions of W r
d (C)m,L for every
L ∈ W r
d (C).
Acknowledgement
It is a pleasure to thank Mircea Mustat¸a for introducing me to jet schemes and
encouragement to start this project. I am grateful to Jesse Kass for his help and discussions
Jacobians of curves. I would like to thank Linquan Ma and Sijun Liu for useful discussions
in the earlier stages of this project.
1. Introduction to jet schemes and varieties of special linear series on a
curve
Let k be an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero. Given a scheme X (of
finite type) over k and an integer m ≥ 0, the jet scheme Xm of order m of X is a scheme
of finite type over k satisfying the following adjunction
(‡)
HomSch /k(Y, Xm) ∼= HomSch /k(Y × Spec k[t]/(tm+1), X)
for every scheme Y of finite type over k.
In particular, the k-rational points of Xm are identified with the m-jets of X,
that is, with the morphisms Spec k[t]/(tm+1) → X. For every j with 0 ≤ j ≤ m,
the natural ring homomorphism k[t]/(tm+1) → k[t]/(tj+1) induces a closed embedding
Spec k[t]/(tj+1) → Spec k[t]/(tm+1). The above adjunction induces a truncation map
ρm
j
: Xm → Xj .
For simplicity, we usually write πX
: Xm → X. For
every fixed point x ∈ X, we write Xm,x for the fiber of πm at x, the m-jets of X centered
at x. It turns out that the geometry of the jet schemes Xm is closely related with the
geometry of scheme X itself.
m or πm to denote the projection ρm
0
4
Z. Zhu
Let C be a smooth projective curve of genus g over field k. We now recall the
definition of Picd(C). For every scheme S, let p and q be the projections of S × C onto S
and C respectively. A family of degree d line bundles on C parameterized by a scheme S
is a line bundle on C × S which restricts to a degree d line bundle on C × {s}, for every
s in S. We say that two such families L and L′ are equivalent if there is a line bundle R
on S such that L′ ∼= L ⊗ q∗R. Picd(C) parameterizes degree d line bundles on C; more
precisely, it represents the functor
F : Sch /k → Set
where F (S) is the set of equivalence classes of families of degree d line bundles on C
parameterized by S. A universal line bundle P on C × Picd(C) is a Poincar´e line bundle
of degree d for C.
Recall now that W r
d (C) is the closed subset of Picd(C) parameterizing line bundles
L of degree d with dim L ≥ r:
W r
d (C) = {L ∈ Picd(C) : deg L = d, h0(L) ≥ r + 1}.
In particular, we have the theta divisor Θ := {L ∈ Picg−1(C) : h0(C, L) 6= 0} = W 0
Each W r
d (C) has a natural scheme structure as a degeneracy locus we now describe.
g−1(C).
Let E be any effective divisor on C of degree e ≥ 2g − d − 1 and let E = O(E). The
following facts are standard (see [ACGH, §IV.3]).
For every family of degree d line bundles L on S × C, the sheaves p∗(L ⊗ q∗(E)) and
p∗(L ⊗ q∗(E) ⊗ Oq−1E) are locally free of ranks d + e + 1 − g and e, respectively. Moreover,
there is an exact sequence on S
(1)
0 → p∗L → p∗(L ⊗ q∗(E))
ΦL−→ p∗(L ⊗ q∗(E) ⊗ Oq−1E) → R1p∗(L) → 0.
With the above notation, W r
d (C) represents the functor Sch /k → Set given by
S 7→(cid:26) equivalence classes of families L of degree d line bundles on
p
−→ S such that rank(ΦL) ≤ d + e − g − r
S × C
(cid:27) .
It can be shown that the above condition rank(ΦL) ≤ d + e − g − r does not depend on
the particular choice of e and E.
In particular, the line bundle L ∈ Picd(C) is in W r
d (C) if and only if locally all the
e + d + 1 − g − r minors of ΦL vanish. Therefore W r
d (C) is a determinantal variety.
Let Tm be the scheme Spec k[t]/(tm+1). We now discuss the jet schemes of the
theta divisor Θm for all m. By the definition of Θ, we have Θm consists of line bundles
Lm ∈ Pic(Tm × C) such that deg(Lm{0}×C) = g − 1 and det(ΦLm) = 0 in k[t]/(tm+1).
Given a positive integer n, we recall that a partition of n is a weakly increasing
sequence 1 ≤ λ1 ≤ λ2 ≤ · · · ≤ λl such that λ1 + · · · + λl = n. The number l of integers
in the sequence is called the length of the partition, and the value λl is the largest term.
The set of partitions with length l is denoted by Λl, and the set of partitions with length
l and largest term at most m is denoted by Λl,m. For every i with 1 ≤ i ≤ m, if λ ∈ Λl,m,
Jet schemes and singularities of W r
d (C) loci
5
we define λ ∈ Λl,i by putting λk = min{λk, i} for every k with 1 ≤ k ≤ l. We thus obtain
a natural map Λl,m → Λl,i.
Fix an effective divisor E of degree e ≥ 2g − d − 1 on C. We now associate a
partition to every Lm ∈ Picd(C)m. p∗(Lm ⊗ q∗(E)) and p∗(Lm ⊗ q∗(E) ⊗ Oq−1E) are locally
free sheaves on Tm, hence they are finitely generated free modules over k[t]/(tm+1).
Definition 1.1. A family of line bundles Lm of degree d on C over Tm is called of type
λ ∈ Λl,m+1 if there are bases of p∗(Lm ⊗ q∗(E)) and p∗(Lm ⊗ q∗(E) ⊗ Oq−1E) in which ΦLm
is represented by the matrix in M(d+e+1−g)×e(k[t]/(tm+1))
1
. . .
0
tλ1
. . .
1
0
0 0
...
...
tλl 0 0
Definition 1.2. Given a partition λ , let ri(λ) be the number of k such that λk = i and
let ni(λ) be the number of k such that λk ≥ i.
It is easy to see that the partition λ in Definition 1.1 does not depend on the choice
of bases. If L is the image of Lm under the truncation map πm : Picd(C)m → Picd(C),
then we will see below that the length of the partition associated to Lm is h0(C, L).
We now give a criterion to decide whether an element Lm ∈ Picg−1(C)m is a jet of
Θ in terms of the partition λ.
Lemma 1.3. For every family of line bundles Lm ∈ Picg−1(C)m centered at L ∈ Picg−1(C)
and of type λ ∈ Λl,m+1, the following are equivalent:
(i) Lm ∈ Θm,L.
(i)′ det(ΦLm) = 0 in k[t]/(tm+1).
λi ≥ m + 1.
rj(λ) · j ≥ m + 1.
nk(λ) ≥ m + 1.
(ii)
(ii)′
(ii)′′
lPi=1
m+1Pj=1
m+1Pk=1
g−1 ⊂ Picg−1(C). With the above notation, for every family
Proof. Recall that Θ = W 0
of line bundles Lm in Θm, the sheaves p∗(Lm ⊗ q∗(E)) and p∗(Lm ⊗ q∗(E) ⊗ Oq−1E) are
locally free of rank e. The definition shows that the theta divisor parameterizes the line
6
Z. Zhu
bundles Lm for which det(ΦLm) = 0. This proves the equivalence between (i) and (i)′. It
is clear that with the choice of basis in Definition 1.1, det(ΦLm) = tλ1+···+λl ∈ k[t]/(tm+1).
Therefore the determinant vanishes if and only if
λi ≥ m + 1.
In order to complete the proof of the lemma, it suffices to show that
lPi
m+1Xk=1
m+1Pj=1
λi =
rj(λ) · j =
nk(λ).
lXi=1
m+1Pk=1
m+1Xj=1
m+1Pk=1 Pj≥k
The first equality is clear by the definition of rj(λ). The second equality follows from
nk(λ) =
rj(λ) =
rj(λ) · j.
(cid:3)
nk(λ) = Pj≥k
rj(λ). Indeed,
Using the definition of W r
d (C), we have the following description of W r
d (C)m,L, which
gives a generalization of Lemma 1.3.
Lemma 1.4. Let Lm ∈ Picd(C)m have type λ = (1 ≤ λ1 ≤ · · · ≤ λl ≤ m + 1). The
following are equivalent:
(i) Lm ∈ W r
(i') All the (e + d + 1 − g − r) minors of ΦLm vanish in k[t]/(tm+1).
d (C)m,L.
λi ≥ m + 1.
(ii)
(ii')
l−rPi=1
l−rPi=1
(l − i − r + 1)(λi − λi−1) ≥ m + 1, where λ0 = 0.
The proof of this lemma is very similar to that of Lemma 1.3, so we leave it to the
reader.
Our first goal is to recover Riemann's Singularity Theorem using jet schemes.
Theorem 1.5. For every L ∈ Θ, we have multLΘ = h0(C, L).
Remark 1.6. Note that the multiplicity of a divisor at a point is one if and only if the
divisor is smooth at that point, hence Theorem 1.5 implies in particular that a line bundle
L ∈ Θ is a smooth point if and only if h0(C, L) = 1.
Before proving the theorem we need some preparations. For every degree d line
bundle L, we shall first describe the fiber of ρm
m−1 : Picd(C)m,L → Picd(C)m−1,L.
Let E be the effective divisor of degree e ≥ 2g − d − 1 in Definition 1.1. By the
universal property of Picd(C), every Lm ∈ Picd(C)m,L is identified with a line bundle on
C ×Tm. Let us fix a line bundle L ∈ Picd(C) and a family of line bundles Lm ∈ Picd(C)m,L
lying over L. For every 0 ≤ i ≤ m, we denote by Li the image of Lm in Picd(C)i,L under
the truncation map Picd(C)m → Picd(C)i. By the short exact sequence (1), H 0(Li) is the
kernel of the morphism
ΦLi : Mi = H 0(Li ⊗ q∗(E)) → Ni = H 0(Li ⊗ q∗(E) ⊗ Oq−1E).
Jet schemes and singularities of W r
d (C) loci
7
There is a k[t]/(tm+1)-module map πm
i
: H 0(Lm) → H 0(Li) induced by restriction
of sections. This can be described as follows. Applying the Base-change Theorem to the
morphism Ti ֒→ Tm, we obtain the following commutative diagram
H 0(Lm)
↓πm
i
֒→ Mm
↓ρM
H 0(Li)
֒→ Mi
ΦLm−−−→ Nm
↓ρN
ΦLi−−→ Ni
Clearly Mi = Mm ⊗k[t]/(tm+1) k[t]/(ti+1) and Ni = Nm ⊗k[t]/(tm+1) k[t]/(ti+1) and the vertical
maps are induced by the quotient map k[t]/(tm+1) → k[t]/(ti+1).
Lemma 1.7. For every 0 ≤ i ≤ m, there is an embedding of k[t]/(tm+1)-modules
such that the image is the kernel of πm
vm
i
: H 0(Li) ֒→ H 0(Lm)
m−i−1 : H 0(Lm) → H 0(Lm−i−1).
Proof. The multiplication with tm−i defines a linear map of k[t]/(tm+1)-modules
k[t]/(ti+1) → k[t]/(tm+1)
and induces embeddings of k[t]/(tm+1) modules Mi
induces an injective k[t]/(tm+1)-module morphism vm
i
It is clear that the image of the embedding um
i
: H 0(Li) → H 0(Lm).
: Mi → Mm is AnnMm(ti+1). By
definition, we have H 0(Lm) ∩ AnnMm(ti+1) = AnnH 0(Lm)(ti+1). The multiplication map
wm
: Ni → Nm is injective, and one deduces easily that the image of vi is AnnH 0(Lm)(ti+1).
i
Since ker πm
(cid:3)
m−i−1 = AnnH 0(Lm)(ti+1), this completes our proof.
um
i−→ Mm and Ni
wm
i−−→ Nm. Therefore it
Lemma 1.8. For every family of line bundles Lm ∈ Picd(C)m of type λ ∈ Λl,m+1, we
have
h0(Lm) =
nk(λ).
Proof. Choose bases {ej} and {fh} for the free modules Mm and Nm such that ΦLm is
represented by the matrix
m+1Xk=1
1
. . .
0
1
tλ1
0
. . .
0 0
...
...
tλl 0 0
= A0 + A1 · t + · · · + Am · tm.
All Ai are (d + e + 1 − g) × e matrices over the field k. For every 0 ≤ i ≤ m the image
of {ej} under the map ρM : Mm → Mi gives a basis of Mi over k[t]/(ti+1). Similarly, the
image of {fh} under ρN : Nm → Ni gives a basis of Ni. With respect to these bases, the
homomorphism ΦLi is represented by the matrix A0 + A1 · t + · · · + Ai · ti.
8
Z. Zhu
We first consider the case m = 0. ΦL is represented by A0, which is a diagonal matrix
with 1 showing up on the first e+d+1−g−l rows, hence h0(L) = dimk ker ΦL = l = n1(λ).
Let λ′ be the type of Lm−1. One can check easily that λ′ is the image of λ under the
natural map Λl,m+1 → Λl,m. For k ≤ m, we have nk(λ′) = nk(λ). Now it suffices to show
that h0(Lm) − h0(Lm−1) = nm+1(λ) for m ≥ 1. For each i > 0, Ai is a diagonal matrix
with entries 0 or 1, with 1's in the rows (e + d + 1 − g) − l + r1 + · · · + ri−1 + j, with
1 ≤ j ≤ ri, where ri = ri(λ) (See Definition 1.2). We now consider {tk · ej} and {tk · fh}
where 0 ≤ k ≤ m to be the bases of Mm and Nm, respectively, as linear spaces over k.
The matrix associated to ΦLm as a morphism of k−linear spaces has the upper triangular
form
ΨLm =
A0 A1 A2
A0 A1
A0
0
0 0
· · · Am−1 Am
· · · Am−2 Am−1 0 0
...
...
. . .
...
...
. . .
0 0
0 0
...
...
A1
A0
. . .
A0
Therefore the associated matrix ΨLm−1 of ΦLm−1 as a k-linear map is the bottom
right corner submatrix of the associated matrix of ΦLm, obtained by omitting the rows
and columns containing the left upper corner A0.
In each row and column of the matrix ΨLm, there is at most one nonzero element.
Therefore rank ΨLm = rank ΨLm−1 +
rank Ai. Since rank(A0) = d + e + 1 − g − l and
mPi=0
rank(Ai) = ri(λ) for 1 ≤ i ≤ m, we deduce that dimk ker ΦLm −dimk ker ΦLm−1 = nm+1(λ).
Therefore h0(Lm) − h0(Lm−1) = nm+1(λ).
(cid:3)
Remark 1.9. For every j with 0 ≤ j ≤ m, Lemmas 1.7 and 1.8 imply that the image of
the morphism πj
0 : H 0(Lj) → H 0(L) has dimension equal to
h0(Lj) − dimk ker(πj
0) = h0(Lj) − h0(Lj−1) = nj+1(λ).
Therefore πj
0 is a zero map if and only if nj+1(λ) = 0.
We now fix a line bundle L ∈ Picd(C) and describe the fibers of the truncation maps
m−1 : Picd(C)m,L → Picd(C)m−1,L for every m. Let {Uα} be an affine covering of C which
ρm
α } be
trivializes the line bundle L by isomorphisms γα : LUα
the corresponding transition functions. For every scheme Uα and i ≥ 1, we have short
exact sequence of sheaves on Uα × Ti as follows:
∼= OUα. Let {gαβ = γβ ◦ γ−1
0 → OUα → O∗
Uα×Ti → O∗
Uα×Ti−1 → 0,
where the embedding morphism maps x ∈ OUα to 1 + x · ti. Since Uα is affine, H j(OUα)
vanishes for every j ≥ 1. We thus obtain an isomorphism H 1(OUα×Ti) ∼= H 1(OUα×Ti−1). In
other words, we have Pic(Uα × Ti) ∼= Pic(Uα × Ti−1). By induction on i with 0 ≤ i ≤ m,
we deduce that {Uα × Tm} is an affine covering of C × Tm which trivializes every line
Jet schemes and singularities of W r
d (C) loci
9
bundle Lm ∈ Picd(C)m,L. In particular, for every line bundle L1 ∈ Picd(C)1,L on C × T1,
there is a trivialization for L1 on the covering {Uα × T1} with the transition functions
{gαβ(1 + tϕ(1)
αβ)}. This gives a bijection ξ : Picd(C)1,L → H 1(C, OC) via ξ(L1) = [ϕ(1)
αβ].
In general, we fix a family of line bundles Lm−1 ∈ Picd(C)m−1,L. After we also fix a
point M in the fiber of ρm
m−1 over Lm−1, we get an isomorphism
(ρm
m−1)−1(Lm−1) ∼= H 1(C, OC).
Since we will use later the description in terms of Cech cohomology classes, we describe this
isomorphism as follows. We choose a trivialization of Lm−1 with the transition functions
gm−1
). It is easy to see that there is a trivialization
αβ
for M with transition functions gm
αβ + · · · + tm−1ϕ(m−1)
:= gαβ(1 + tϕ(1)
αβ + · · · + tm−1ϕ(m−1)
αβ + tmϕ(m)
αβ ).
αβ =: gαβ(1 + tϕ(1)
αβ
Every point Lm ∈ (ρm
m−1)−1(Lm−1) has transition functions
gαβ(1 + tϕ(1)
αβ + · · · + tm−1ϕ(m−1)
αβ + tm(ϕ(m)
αβ + ψαβ))
where [ψαβ] ∈ H 1(C, OC). We thus obtain an isomorphism
ξ : (ρm
m−1)−1(Lm−1) → H 1(C, OC)
given by ξ(Lm) = [ψαβ]. Abusing the notation, we write [Lm] for the cohomology class
corresponding to Lm. Note, however, that this depends on the choice of M.
Let sm−1 ∈ H 0(Lm−1) be a nonzero section. The obstruction to extending sm−1 to a
section of Lm can be described as follows. We have a short exact sequence of sheaves on
C × Tm,
0 → L → Lm → Lm−1 → 0.
Let δLm be the connecting map H 0(Lm−1) → H 1(C, L). The long exact sequence on
cohomology implies that sm−1 can be extended to a section sm of Lm ∈ (ρm
m−1)−1(Lm−1)
if and only if δLm(sm−1) = 0.
With the above notation, we get the following more explicit obstruction to extending
a section of Lm−1 in terms of Cech cohomology.
Lemma 1.10. Fix a line bundle M in the fiber of ρm
sm−1 = (
c(j)
α tj) ∈ H 0(Lm−1), let s0 be the its image under πm
m−1 over Lm−1. For a fixed section
0 : H 0(Lm−1) → H 0(L).
m−1Pj=0
The section sm−1 has an extension to a section of Lm if and only if
(†)
ν(s0 ⊗ [Lm]) is the cohomology class corresponding to (−γ−1
α (
where ν is the natural pairing H 0(C, L) ⊗ H 1(C, O) → H 1(C, L).
ϕ(j)
αβc(m−j)
α
))
mXj=1
Proof. Assume there is an extension of sm−1 ∈ H 0(Lm−1) to a section sm ∈ H 0(Lm).
Locally sm−1 is given by functions
m−1Pj=0
c(j)
α tj ∈ Γ(Uα × Tm−1, OUα×Tm−1). We write sm as
10
Z. Zhu
m−1Pj=0
c(j)
α tj + c(m)
α tm. Let γm
α : LmUα×Tm → OUα×Tm be a trivialization of Lm on Uα × Tm.
We thus have the following equality on (Uα ∩ Uβ) × Tm:
(γm
α )−1(
mXj=0
α tj) = (γm
c(j)
β )−1(
c(j)
β tj).
mXj=0
mPj=0
mXj=0
Since (γm
α )−1 = (γm
β )−1 ◦ gm
αβ, we have (γm
β )−1 ◦ gm
αβ(
explicitly, we obtain
c(j)
α tj) = (γm
β )−1(
gαβ(1 + tϕ(1)
αβ + · · · + tm−1ϕ(m−1)
αβ + tm(ϕ(m)
αβ + ψ(m)
αβ ))(
c(j)
α tj) = (
c(j)
β tj). More
c(j)
β tj)
mPj=0
mXj=0
in O((Uα ∩ Uβ) × Tm). We now expend this equation and take the coefficient of ti for i
with 0 ≤ i ≤ m. If i < m, the equation we obtain from the coefficient of ti always holds
since sm−1 is a section of Lm−1. For i = m, we obtain
gαβ(ψαβ · c(0)
α +
ϕ(j)
αβ · c(m−j)
α
+ c(m)
α ) = (c(m)
β
)
mXj=1
in O((Uα ∩ Uβ) × T ). Note that the restriction to the trivialization γm
of Lm is exactly the trivialization γα, we have
α to the subsheaf L
(γβ)−1 ◦ gαβ(ψαβ · c(0)
α +
ϕ(j)
αβ · c(m−j)
α
mXj=1
+ c(m)
α ) = (γβ)−1(c(m)
β
)
as sections of L on (Uα ∩ Uβ).
Clearly (γβ)−1 ◦gαβ(c(m)
α )−(γβ)−1(c(m)
β
We obtain that ν(s0 ⊗ [Lm]), the cohomology class corresponding to (γ−1
equal to the cohomology class corresponding to (−γ−1
α (
ϕ(j)
αβc(m−j)
α
)). By reversing the
) gives the zero cohomology class in H 1(C, L).
α )) is
α (ψαβ · c(0)
argument, we also obtain the converse.
(cid:3)
mPj=1
Remark 1.11. The identification between the fiber of Picd(C)m,L → Picd(C)m−1,L and
H 1(C, OC) is not canonical. In particular, the expression for γ(s0 ⊗ [Lm]) in (†) does
depend on M. However, for any fixed nonzero section sm−1, the dimension of the subset
{Lm ∈ (ρm
m−1)−1(Lm−1) H 0(Lm) → H 0(Lm−1) has nonempty fiber over sm−1}
is independent of M.
We now prove Theorem 1.5. The idea is similar to that in Kempf's proof of Riemann's
multiplicity formula.
Proof of Theorem 1.5. For every effective Cartier divisor D on a smooth variety X and a
point x ∈ D, the multiplicity of D at x is equal to the minimal positive integer m such
that Dm,x is a proper subset of Xm,x.
Jet schemes and singularities of W r
d (C) loci
11
Let L ∈ Θ be a line bundle with l = h0(L). We first show that Θm,L = Picg−1(C)m,L
for every m < l. This follows from the description of Θ as a determinantal variety. Indeed,
let Lm ∈ Picg−1(C)m,L be a line bundle of type λ ∈ Λl,m, then
λi ≥ l > m. By Lemma
1.3, we have Lm ∈ Θm,L. Hence Θm,L = Picg−1(C)m,L for every m < l.
lPi=1
lPi=1
We now show that Θm,L 6= Picg−1(C)m,L for m = l. Let Z1 be the image of Θm,L
under Picg−1(C)m → Picg−1(C)1. It suffices to show that Z1 6= Picg−1(C)1,L. For every
Lm ∈ Θm,L of type λ = (1 ≤ λ1 ≤ · · · ≤ λl), Lemma 1.3 implies that
λi ≥ m + 1.
Hence λl ≥ 2 and n2(λ) ≥ 1. By Lemma 1.8, we have h0(L1) − h0(L) = n2(λ) ≥ 1. By
Remark 1.9, we see that the map π1
0 : H 0(L1) → H 0(L) is not zero. Equivalently, there is
a nonzero section s0 ∈ H 0(L) which can be extended to a section of H 0(L1). Let Z2 be
the subset
{L1 ∈ Picg−1(C)1 π1
0 : H 0(L1) → H 0(L) is not zero}.
We have seen that Z1 is a subset of Z2, hence it is enough to show that Z2 6= Picg−1(C)1,L.
We now apply Lemma 1.10 with m = 1. Let M be the trivial deformation of L, i.e.
M represents the zero tangent vector at L. To compute the dimension of Z2, we consider
the proper subset
Z = {(W, L1) ν(s0 ⊗ [L1]) = 0 for every s0 ∈ W }
of P(H 0(C, L)) × H 1(C, OC). Here P(H 0(C, L)) stands for the projective space of one
dimensional subspaces of H 0(C, L). Let W be an element in P(H 0(C, L)) and s0 a nonzero
element of W . The induced map H 1(C, OC) → H 1(C, L) taking [L1] to ν(s0 ⊗ [L1]) is
surjective. Hence each fiber of the first projection map Z → P(H 0(C, L)) is a codimension
l vector space of H 1(C, OC). We obtain dim Z = g − 1. Since Z2 is a subset of the
image of the second projection map Z → H 1(C, OC), we obtain dim Z2 ≤ g − 1. Hence
Z2 6= Picg−1(C)1,L. This completes the proof.
✷
For smooth projective curves of genus g ≤ 2, Riemann's Singularity Theorem implies
that the theta divisor is smooth. We consider the singularities of the theta divisor for
curves of genus g ≥ 3 in the next section.
2. Singularities of the Theta divisor and of the W r
d loci
Our first goal in this section is to give an upper bound for dim W r
d (C)m,L for each
L ∈ Picd(C) and m ≥ 0. We fix a line bundle L of degree d with l = h0(L).
For every partition λ ∈ Λl,m+1, we denote by Cλ,m the subset
{Lm ∈ Picd(C)m,L Lm is of type λ}.
It is easy to see that locally Cλ,m is the pull back of a locally closed subset of the m-th
jet scheme of the variety of (d + e + 1 − g) × e matrices. Therefore Cλ,m is a constructible
subset of Picd(C)m,L. By Lemma 1.4, we have W r
Cλ,m, where λ varies over
d (C)m,L =Sλ
12
Z. Zhu
the partitions in Λl,m+1 satisfying
λi ≥ m + 1. In particular, we have a finite union
Cλ,m, where λ varies over all elements in Λl,m+1 with
λi ≥ m + 1. In order
l−rPi=1
lPi=1
Θm,L =Sλ
j+1Pk=1
: Picd(C)m,L → Picd(C)i,L for every i ≤ m.
to estimate the dimension of Θm,L, it is enough to bound the dimension of Cλ,m for
every λ ∈ Λl,m+1. The idea is to describe the image of Cλ,m under the truncation map
ρm
i
Definition 2.1. A weak flag of H 0(C, L) of signature κ = (κi) with κ1 ≥ · · · ≥ κn is a
sequence of subspaces of H 0(C, L),
V : H 0(C, L) = V0 ⊇ V1 ⊇ · · · ⊇ Vn−1 ⊇ Vn
such that dim Vi = κi for every 1 ≤ i ≤ n. Here n is called the length of the weak flag
V. Given a weak flag V of H 0(C, L) of length n, for every i ≤ n we denote by V(i) the
truncated weak flag of length i:
V(i) : H 0(C, L) = V0 ⊇ V1 ⊇ · · · ⊇ Vi−1 ⊇ Vi.
For every Lm ∈ Cλ,m and every j with 0 ≤ j ≤ m, we denote by Lj the image of Lm
: Picd(C)m → Picd(C)j. Lemma 1.8 implies that the function Cλ,m → Z which
under ρm
j
takes Lm to h0(Lj) =
nk(λ) is constant. For a fixed Lm ∈ Cλ,m, the images Vj of the
morphisms πj
0 : H 0(Lj) → H 0(L) give a weak flag VLm of H 0(L) of length m. Remark
1.9 implies that dim Vj = dim H 0(Lj) − dim H 0(Lj−1) = nj+1(λ). Hence the signature κ
of the weak flag VLm, with κj = nj+1(λ), only depends on the partition λ.
Lemma 1.7 shows that there is a short exact sequence
0 → H 0(Lm−1)
vm
m−1−−−→ H 0(Lm) ։ Vm → 0.
We now choose a splitting of this short exact sequence, which gives a decomposition
0 → H 0(Lm−2)
map πm
sequence
H 0(Lm) = H 0(Lm−1) ⊕ eVm , with eVm mapping isomorphically onto Vm. The restriction
m−1 : H 0(Lm) → H 0(Lm−1) maps eVm isomorphic to its image. For the short exact
we can choose a splitting H 0(Lm−1) = H 0(Lm−2) ⊕eVm−1 such that the restriction map
m−1 maps eVm into eVm−1. By descending induction on i with 0 ≤ i ≤ m, we can find a
subspace eVi ⊂ H 0(Li) for each i such that
0 : H 0(Li) → H 0(L) to eVi induces an
vm−1
m−2−−−→ H 0(Lm−1) ։ Vm−1 → 0,
(1) The restriction of the truncation map πi
(2) The truncation map πi
isomorphism onto Vi.
πm
i−1 : H 0(Li) → H 0(Li−1) takes eVi into eVi−1
Definition 2.2. A weak flag V of H 0(C, L) of length m is extended compatibly to the line
bundle Lm if there are linear subspaces eVi ⊂ H 0(C, Li) for each i ≤ m such that (1) and
(2) above hold.
Jet schemes and singularities of W r
d (C) loci
13
In this case, the set of linear subspaces {eVi}i as above is called a compatible extension
of V to line bundle Lm. The above argument shows that every weak flag VLm associated
to a line bundle Lm can be extended compatibly to the line bundle Lm.
For every i with 1 ≤ i ≤ m, recall that λ is the image of λ ∈ Λl,m+1 under the map
Λl,m+1 → Λl,i+1. Given a weak flag V of H 0(L) of length m, we denote by Sλ
i,V the set of
line bundles Li ∈ Picd(C)i,L such that Li ∈ Ci,λ and V(i) can be extended compatibly to
i,V′, where V′ varies over
Li. For a fixed non-increasing sequence κ, we define Sλ
Sλ
0,V = Sλ
all weak flags of H 0(L) of signature κ. For convenience, we set Sλ
i,κ =SV′
0,κ = {L}.
Standard arguments show that Sλ
i,κ are constructible subsets of Picd(C)i,L.
For the benefit of the reader, we give the details in the appendix. The truncation map
ρm
i,κ with κj = nj+1(λ). In order to
i
estimate the dimension of Cλ,m, we only need to estimate dim Sλ
: Picd(C)m,L → Picd(C)i,L maps Cλ,m to the set Sλ
i,κ for a suitable i ≤ m.
i,V and Sλ
Definition 2.3. For a fixed weak flag V of H 0(L) of length m, for every i and j with
(1) Li ∈ Sλ
i,j,V to be the set of pairs (Li, W ) such that
i,V and W is a subspace of H 0(Li) of dimension κj.
1 ≤ i ≤ j ≤ m, we define eSλ
(2) There is a compatible extension {eVl}l≤i of V(i) to Li such that W is the inverse
image of Vj in H 0(Li) under the isomorphism eVi → Vi.
We call the W in a pair (Li, W ) as above a lifting of Vj to Li. For any element
s ∈ Vj, the preimage of s via the isomorphism W → Vj is called a lifting of s to the level
i.
In the appendix we also show that eSλ
Grassmann bundle. For the convenience, we set eSλ
Lemma 2.4. Let X1 and Y1 be constructible subsets of algebraic varieties X and Y
respectively. Let f : X1 → Y1 be the restriction of a morphism g : X → Y . If all the fibers
of f are of dimension d ≥ 0, then dim X1 = dim Y1 + d.
i,j,V is a constructible subset of a suitable
0,j,V = {(L, Vj)} for every λ.
Proof. Since Y1 is a constructible subset of Y , we write Y1 as a finite disjoint union of
locally closed subset Vk of Y . We may assume that all subsets Vk are irreducible. For every
k, the inverse image f −1(Vk), as the intersection of g−1(Vk) with X1, is a constructible
{dim f −1(Vk)}.
subset of X. We thus have dim Y1 = max
Hence it is enough to show the statement for the map f −1(Vk) → Vk for every k. We may
thus assume that Y1 is an irreducible algebraic variety.
{dim Vk} and dim X1 = max
k
k
Consider the stratification X1 =
(Wl), where each Wl is a locally closed subset of
X. For every l, the morphism Wl → Y1 has fibers of dimension ≤ d. We get
m`l=1
dim Wl ≤ dim f (Wl) + d ≤ dim Y1 + d.
This implies that dim X1 = max
l
{dim Wl} ≤ dim Y1 + d.
14
Z. Zhu
We now prove the other direction of the inequality. Let {Wl}l=1,...,m0 be the collection
of those Wl that dominates Y1. (This collection is nonempty since otherwise f −1(y) would
be empty for a general point y ∈ Y1.) We choose an open subset V ⊂ Y1 such that
dim(Wl ∩ f −1(y)) is constant for y ∈ V and l ≤ m0. There is a subset Wl with l ≤ m0
such that dim(f −1(y) ∩ Wl) = dim f −1(y) = d. We obtain that dim Wl = d + dim Y1. We
thus have
dim X ≥ dim W1 = dim Y1 + d.
This completes the proof.
Lemma 2.5. For a fixed L ∈ Picd(C) with l = h0(C, L) and a partition λ ∈ Λl,m+1, let
κ = (κ1, κ2, . . . , κm) be a signature of length m, with κj ≤ nj+1(λ) for every j ≤ m, and
V a weak flag of H 0(L) of signature κ. For every i with 1 ≤ i ≤ m, we write di for the
dimension of the kernel of
(cid:3)
Then the the following holds:
µVi : Vi ⊗ H 0(C, K ⊗ L−1) → H 0(C, K).
(1) dim Sλ
i,V − dim Sλ
i−1,V ≤ g + di − κi · (g − d − 1 + ni(λ)),
(2) dim Sλ
i,V ≤ gi −
{(κj · (g − d − 1 + nj(λ)) − dj}.
iPj=1
Proof. Since we fix the partition λ, we may and will omit the superscript λ in the proof.
We apply Lemma 1.10 to compute the dimension of Si,V inductively on i. S0,V = {L}
implies that dim S0,V = 0. Consider the following commutative diagram:
h→ eSi−1,i,V
↓ρ1
Si,V → Si−1,V
eSi,i,V
↓ρ2
The horizontal map h maps (Li, W ′) to (Li−1, W ), where W is the image of W ′
i−1 : H 0(C, Li) → H 0(C, Li−1). The vertical map ρ1 is given
under the truncation map πi
by mapping (Li, W ′) to Li and ρ2 is defined similarly.
Let Li be a fixed point in Si,V. The fiber of ρ1 over the point Li is the set of linear
subspaces W ′ ⊂ H 0(Li) that map isomorphically onto Vi via πi
0 : H 0(Li) → H 0(L). Let
{s0,k}k be a basis of Vi. A lifting W ′ of Vi is determined by the preimage of s0,k in W ′
for each k. By Lemma 1.7, we see that for every s ∈ Vi, any two liftings of s to the level
i differ up to an element of H 0(Li−1). Therefore, the relative dimension of the map ρ1 is
h0(Li−1) · κi = (
nj(λ)) · κi. Similarly the relative dimension of the second vertical map
iPj=1
ρ2 is (
nj(λ)) · κi.
i−1Pj=1
Consider the horizontal map h. For every element (Li−1, W ) ∈ eSi−1,i,V, we now give
a criterion to decide whether it is in the image of h or not. Fix an element M in the
fiber of ρi
i−1)−1(Li−1) with
H 1(C, OC). Let {s0,k}k be a basis of W . We donote by si−1,k the lifting of s0,k to the level
i−1 : Picd(C)i → Picd(C)i−1 over Li−1. We identify the fiber (ρi
Jet schemes and singularities of W r
d (C) loci
15
i−1 in W . With the notation in Lemma 1.10, every element si−1,k = (
c(j)
k,αtj) ∈ H 0(Li−1)
i−1Pj=0
has an extension to a section of M′ ∈ (ρi
holds
i−1)−1(Li−1) if and only if the following equation
(†k)
ν(s0,k ⊗ [M′]) = the cohomology class corresponding to (−γ−1
α (
ϕ(j)
αβc(i−j)
k,α )).
iXj=1
Hence (Li−1, W ) is in the image of h if and only if there is a point M′ ∈ (ρi
i−1)−1(Li−1)
such that the above identity (†k) holds for every k. We now assume that (Li−1, W ) is in
the image of h and fix an element (M′, W ′) in the fiber of h over (Li−1, W ). The above
argument implies that
ρ1(h−1(Li−1, W )) = {[Li] ∈ (ρi
i−1)−1(Li−1) ν(s0,k ⊗ ([Li] − [M′])) = 0 for every k}.
By taking the dual linear spaces, we now deduce that ρ1(h−1(Li−1, W )) is an affine
space consisting of the elements in H 1(C, OC) that annihilate the image of the pairing
µVi : Vi ⊗ H 0(C, K ⊗ L−1) → H 0(C, K).
It follows that dim ρ1(h−1(Li−1, W )) = g − (κi · (l − d − 1 + g) − di).
If Li is an element in ρ1(h−1(Li−1, W )), then a pair (Li, W ′) is in the fiber of h
over (Li−1, W ) if and only if the truncation map H 0(Li) → H 0(Li−1) takes W ′ into W .
A lifting W ′ of W is determined by the preimage of {si−1,k}k in W ′. By Lemma 1.7,
we see that any two liftings only differ by an element of H 0(L). Hence we deduce that
h−1(Li−1, W ) ∩ ρ−1
1 (Li) is an affine space of dimension κi · l. Thus the dimension of every
nonempty fiber of the horizonal map h is g + di − κi · (l − d − 1 + g) + κi · l.
By Lemma 2.4, we have:
dimeSi,i,V ≤ eSi−1,i,V + g + di − κi · (l − d − 1 + g) + κi · l
iPj=1
dimeSi,i,V = dim Si,V + κi · (
i−1Pj=1
dimeSi−1,i,V = dim Si−1,V + κi · (
nj(λ)))
nj(λ))
It follows that
dim Si,V − dim Si−1,V ≤ g − κi · (g − d − 1) + di − κi · ni(λ).
This proves (1).
Part (2) follows from (1) by induction on i, using dim S0,V = 0.
(cid:3)
Remark 2.6. From the proof, we know that the equality in (1) can be achieved if the
i−1,i,V is a surjection. In fact, we will see that equality can be achieved
when we apply the above lemma in the proofs of the main theorems.
map h : eSλ
i,i,V → eSλ
We now prove our first main result.
16
Z. Zhu
Proof of Theorem A. Let C be a curve of genus g ≥ 3. Since we fix the curve C, we
may and will write W r
d for W r
d (C) for every r and d. By Remark 1.6, we know that
(W l−1
m)−1(Θsing), it is enough
Θsing = W 1
g−1
g−1). To bound the dimension of (πΘ
r W l
to bound the dimension of (πΘ
m)−1(W l−1
g−1
r W l
g−1) for each l ≥ 2.
g−1 = Sl≥2
Let L be a point in W l−1
g−1
g−1. We have seen in the proof of Theorem 1.5 that
Θm,L = Picg−1(C)m,L for m < l. Hence dim Θm,L = mg for m < l. We now assume that
m ≥ l. Recall that we put Cλ,m = {Lm ∈ Θm,L Lm is of type λ}, where λ is a partition
r W l
in Λl,m+1. By Lemma 1.3, Θm,L is a finite union of Cλ,m, with λ satisfying
In order to prove the theore, we first bound the dimension of each Cλ,m.
λi ≥ m + 1.
lPi=1
lPi=1
We now fix a partition λ ∈ Λl,m+1 with
λi ≥ m + 1. Let κ be the signature with
κi = 1 for every i ≤ λl − 1 and κi = 0 for i ≥ λl. If Lm ∈ Cλ, we denote by Li the
: Picm(C)m → Pici(C)i for every i ≤ m. The definition of nk(λ)
image of Lm under ρm
i
implies that λl is the largest index k such that nk(λ) 6= 0. Remark 1.9 implies that the
map πλl−1
0 : H 0(Lλl) → H 0(L) is zero.
Let W ⊂ H 0(C, L) be the 1 -- dimensional subspace in the image of πλl−1
. Consider a weak
flag of H 0(L) of signature κ,
: H 0(Lλl−1) → H 0(L) is nonzero while the map πλl
0
0
VW : H 0(C, L) = V0 ⊃ V = V1 = · · · Vλl−1 = W ⊃ Vλl = · · · = Vm = 0.
Hence Li is in Sλ
λl−1 : Picg−1(C)m,L → Picg−1(C)λl−1,L maps Cλ,m into Sλ
ρm
i,V for each i ≤ λl − 1. We thus conclude that the truncation map
λl−1,κ.
Let Flagκ be the variety parameterizing all weak flags of signature κ. Let W be a
1-dimensional subspace of H 0(C, L). It defines a weak flag VW = {Vi} of signature κ. We
thus have a bijection between Flagκ and P(H 0(C, L)). We now compute the dimension of
Sλ
λl−1,VW . Let s0 be a nonzero element in W . The multiplication map
ms0 : H 0(C, KC ⊗ L−1) → H 0(C, KC)
is always injective. We thus conclude that W ⊗H 0(C, KC ⊗L−1) → H 0(C, KC) is injective.
Recall that di is the dimension of the kernel of map
µVi : Vi ⊗ H 0(C, KC ⊗ L−1) → H 0(C, KC).
We conclude that di = 0 for every i with 0 ≤ i ≤ m. Moreover, the dual map of ms0,
s0 : H 1(C, OC) → H 1(C, L), is a surjection. Lemma 1.10 implies that for
denoted by m∗
every i ≤ λl − 1 and every si−1 ∈ H 0(Li−1) which is a lifting of s0, there are line bundles
Li over Li−1 such that si−1 can be extended as a section of Li. Therefore, the horizontal
i−1,i,VW is a surjection. By Lemma 2.5 and Remark 2.6, we obtain
map h : eSλ
i,i,VW → eSλ
that for every weak flag VW
dim Sλ
λl−1,VW = (λl − 1)g −
nk(λ).
λl−1Xk=1
Jet schemes and singularities of W r
d (C) loci
17
By Lemma 2.4, we obtain that dim Sλ
λl−1,κ ≤ max
W
{dim Sλ
where W ∈ H 0(C, L). We consider Cλ,m as a subset of the preimage of Sλ
map ρm
λl−1,VW } + dim PH 0(L),
λl−1,κ under the
λl−1 : Picg−1(C)m → Picg−1(C)λl−1.
Hence
dim Cλ,m ≤ g · (m − λl + 1) + max
{dim Sλl−1,VW } + dim P(H 0(L))
W
= mg −
= mg − (
nj + l − 1
λi − rλl) + l − 1
λl−1Pj=1
lPi=1
Martens' theorem says that for every smooth curve of genus g ≥ 3, and every d and
d (C) ≤ d − 2r. (See [Kem]). For
r with 2 ≤ d ≤ g − 1 and 0 < 2r ≤ d, we have dim W r
1 ≤ m < l, we have
dim(πΘ
m)−1(W l−1
g−1
r W l
g−1) = dim (W l−1
g−1
r W l
g−1) + mg
≤ g − 1 − 2(l − 1) + mg
= (m + 1)(g − 1) + (m − 2(l − 1))
≤ (m + 1)(g − 1) − m
For m ≥ l, we have
(∗)
dim(πΘ
m)−1(W l−1
g−1
r W l
g−1) ≤ max
{dim(Cλ) + g − 2l + 1}
≤ max
λ
λ (cid:26)(m + 1)(g − 1) − (
λi − m − 1) − (l − rλl(λ))(cid:27)
where λ varies over partitions in Λl,m+1 withPl
m,we have dim(πΘ
m)−1(W l−1
g−1
r W l
i=1 λi ≥ m + 1. We conclude that for every
g−1) ≤ (m + 1)(g − 1). Furthermore, if the equality is
achieved for some m, then there is λ ∈ Λl,m+1 such that
λi = m + 1 and l = rλl(λ),
i.e. λ1 = · · · = λl. It follows that for m such that m + 1 is not divisible by any integer
l ∈ [2, g − 1], the set (πΘ
g−1) has dimension smaller than
m)−1(W l−1
g−1
r W l
(πΘ
lPi=1
lPi=1
m)−1(Θsing) = Sl≥2
(m + 1)(g − 1). Hence Θm is irreducible for arbitrarily large m, which implies that Θm is
irreducible for all m. (See [Mus1, Proposition 1.6].) This implies that
for every m.
dim(πΘ
m)−1(Θsing) ≤ (m + 1)(g − 1) − 1
In order to get the lower bound for dim(πΘ
m)−1(Θsing), we need the following lemma,
see [Mus1, proposition 1.6].
Lemma 2.7. If X is a locally complete intersection variety of dimension n and Z ⊂ X
is a closed subscheme, then dim(πX
m)−1(Z) + n for every m ≥ 1.
m+1)−1(Z) ≥ dim(πX
If C is a hyperelliptic curve, we show that dim(πΘ
m)−1(Θsing) = (m + 1)(g − 1) − 1
by induction on m ≥ 1. By [ACGH, §VI.4], we know that Θsing has dimension equal to
18
Z. Zhu
g − 3, which implies that dim(πΘ
1 )−1(Θsing) = g − 3 + g = 2(g − 1) − 1. We thus have the
assertion for m = 1. Assume now that the assertion holds for m−1. A repeated application
of Lemma 2.7 implies that for every m ≥ 1, dim(πΘ
1 )(L).
Hence for every L ∈ Θsing, dim(πΘ
m)−1(L) ≥ (m−1)(g −1)+dim(π−1
m)−1(L) ≥ (m − 1)(g − 1) + g. Therefore
dim(πΘ
m)−1(Θsing) ≥ dim Θsing + (m − 1)(g − 1) + g = (m + 1)(g − 1) − 1.
This completes the proof of the theorem for hyperelliptic curves.
We now assume that C is a nonhyperelliptic curve of genus g, and show that
m)−1(Θsing) = (m + 1)(g − 1) − 2 by induction on m. By [ACGH, §VI.4], we have
dim(πΘ
dim Θsing = g − 4, hence dim(πΘ
1 )−1(Θsing) = g − 4 + g = 2(g − 1) − 2. This proves
the assertion for m = 1. A repeated application of Lemma 2.7 implies that for every
L ∈ Θsing and every m ≥ 1, dim(πΘ
1 )−1(L). We thus
have dim(πΘ
m)−1(Θsing) ≥ g − 4 + (m − 1)(g − 1) + g = (m + 1)(g − 1) − 2.
m)−1(L) ≥ (m − 1)(g − 1) + dim(πΘ
In order to finish the proof, it is enough to show that
dim(πΘ
m)−1(Θsing) < (m + 1)(g − 1) − 1
for every m. Assume there is some m0 such that dim(πΘ
A repeated application of Lemma 2.7 implies that for every m > m0,
m0)−1(Θsing) ≥ (m0 + 1)(g − 1) − 1.
dim(πΘ
m)−1(Θsing) ≥ (m − m0)(g − 1) + dim(πΘ
m0)−1(Θsing) ≥ (m + 1)(g − 1) − 1.
On the other hand, for nonhyperelliptic curves, Martens' theorem has a better bound,
namely dim W r
d ≤ d − 2r − 1. By applying it for the theta divisor, we have
Arguing as in (∗), we obtain
dim(W l−1
g−1
r W l
g−1) ≤ g − 2l.
dim(πΘ
m)−1(W l−1
g−1
r W l
g−1) ≤ max
λ ((m + 1)(g − 1) − (
where λ varies over partitions in Λl,m=1 withPl
is a λ ∈ Λl,m+1 with
λi = m + 1 and rλl(λ) = l, we have
λi − m − 1) − (l − rλl(λ)) − 1)
lXi=1
i=1 λi ≥ m + 1. It follows that unless there
lPi=1
dim(πΘ
m)−1(Θsing) < (m + 1)(g − 1) − 1.
Therefore this holds for every m such that m+1 is not divisible by any integer 2 ≤ l ≤ g−1.
Since there are arbitrarily large such m, we obtain a contradiction.
✷
In [Mus1], Mustat¸a describes complete intersection rational singularities in terms of
jet schemes as follows. If X is a local complete intersection variety of dimension n over k,
then the following are equivalent:
(i) X has rational singularities.
(ii) X has canonical singularities.
(iii) Xm is irreducible for each m.
(iv) dim π−1
m (Xsing) < n(m + 1) for every m.
Jet schemes and singularities of W r
d (C) loci
19
The equivalence of the first two parts is due to Elkik, see [Elk]. Note also that by Theorem
3.3 in [EMY], for a reduced irreducible divisor D on a smooth variety X of dimension n,
the following are equivalent,
(i) The jet scheme Dm is a normal variety for every m.
(ii) D has terminal singularities.
(iii) For every m, dim(πD
m)−1(Dsing) ≤ (m + 1)(n − 1) − 2.
Applying these two results to the theta divisor, we obtain the following result concerning
the singularities of this variety.
Corollary 2.8. Let C be a smooth projective curve of genus g ≥ 3 over k. The theta
divisor has terminal singularities if C is a nonhyperelliptic curve. If C is hyperelliptic,
then the theta divisor has canonical non-terminal singularities. In particular, the theta
divisor has rational singularities for every smooth curve.
We now apply the above ideas to compute the log canonical threshold of the pair
d (C), where C is general in the moduli space of curves.
d (C)) at a point L ∈ W r
(Picd(C), W r
In [Mus2, Corollary 3.6], one gives the following formula for the log canonical thresh-
old of a pair in terms of the dimensions of the jet schemes. If Y ⊂ X is a closed subscheme
and Z ⊂ X is a nonempty closed subset, then the log canonical threshold of the pair (X, Y )
at Z is given by
lctZ(X, Y ) = dim X − sup
m≥0
dim(πY
m)−1(Y ∩ Z)
m + 1
.
For every L ∈ W r
d (C), the above formula implies that
dim W r
lctL(Picd(C), W r
d (C)) = g − sup
m≥0
d (C)m,L
.
m + 1
Our main goal is to estimate the dimension of W r
d (C)m,L for each m.
We now turn to the proof of Theorem B. Let C be a general smooth projective
curve of genus g and let L be a line bundle on C. The generality assumption on C implies
that the natural pairing
µ0 : H 0(C, L) ⊗ H 0(C, KC ⊗ L−1) → H 0(C, KC)
is injective for every L. This was stated by Petri and first proved by Gieseker [Gie].
Before proving the theorem, we need to prove an identity for every partition as
preparation.
Lemma 2.9. Let λ ∈ Λl,m+1 and λ0 = 0. We now prove that
n2
i (λ) =
λlXi=1
lXi=1
(l − i + 1)2(λi − λi−1).
20
Z. Zhu
Proof. Given a partition λ ∈ Λl,m+1, we may write it as:
1 ≤ λ1 = · · · = λm1 < λm1+1 = · · · = λm2 < λm2+1 · · · λmk < λmk+1 = · · · = λl.
For simplicity, we write ni for ni(λ). It is easy to see that
n1 = · · · = nλm1 = l
nλm1 +1 = · · · = nλm2 = l − m1
· · ·
nλmk +1 = · · · = nλl = l − mk−1
This implies that
lXi=1
(l − i + 1)2(λi − λi−1) = l2(λ1) + (l − m1)2(λm1+1 − λm1) + · · · + (l − mk)2(λmk+1 − λmk)
= l2(λm1) + (l − m1)2(λm2 − λm1) + · · · + (l − mk)2(λl − λmk )
n2
i + · · · +
λlXi=λmk +1
n2
i
l2 +
=
=
λm1Xi=1
λlXi=1
λm2Xi=λm1+1
λlXi=1
n2
i =
n2
i (λ)
(cid:3)
l−rPi=1
Proof of Theorem B. Let C be a general smooth projective curve in the sense of Petri
d (C) with l = h0(C, L) ≥ r + 1. Since we are
and Gieseker. Let L be a line bundle in W r
only interested in the asymptotic behavior of W r
d (C)m,L, we can assume that m ≥ l. By
Lemma 1.4 we have a stratification W r
d (C)m,L =S Cλ,m, where λ ∈ Λl,m+1 are taken over
all length l partitions satisfying
λi ≥ m + 1.
: Picd(C)m → Picd(C)i. The images Vi of the maps πi
We now fix such a partition λ. Let κ be a signature with κi = ni+1(λ) for i with
1 ≤ i ≤ m. For every Lm ∈ Cλ,m, we denote by Li the image of Lm under the truncation
ρm
0 : H 0(Li) → H 0(C, L) give a
i
weak flag VLm. By Remark 1.9, we obtain dim Vi = h0(Li)−h0(Li−1) = ni+1(λ). Therefore
VLm is a weak flag of signature κ. The image of Lm in Picd(C)λl−1 is in Sλ
. Hence
the truncation map ρm
Sλ
λl−1,V,
where V varies over all weak flags of signature κ. The key step is to compute the dimension
of Sλ
λl−1 : Picd(C)m → Picd(C)λl−1 maps Cλ,m to Sλ
λl−1,V for each V. We keep the notation in the proof of Lemma 2.5.
λl−1,κ = SV
λl−1,VLm
The fact that the canonical pairing
µ0 : H 0(C, L) ⊗ H 0(C, KC ⊗ L−1) → H 0(C, KC)
is injective implies that all restrictions µVi : Vi ⊗ H 0(C, KC ⊗ L−1) → H 0(C, KC) are
injective. Hence di = dim ker µVi is zero for every weak flag V of H 0(L) of signature κ.
Jet schemes and singularities of W r
d (C) loci
21
h : eSλ
in eSλ
i,i,V → eSλ
i−1,i,V. Given a point M in the fiber of ρi
We now show that if the canonical pairing µ0 is injective, then all horizontal maps
i−1,i,V in the proof of Lemma 2.5 are surjective. Let (Li−1, W ) be an element
i−1 : Picd(C)i → Picd(C)i−1 over Li−1, we
i−1)−1(Li−1) ∼= H 1(C, OC). Let {s0,p}p be a basis of Vi, and si−1,p
get an isomorphism (ρi
the lifting of s0,p to the level i − 1 in W . It is easy to see that (Li−1, W ) is in the image of
h if and only if there is an element Li ∈ (ρi
i−1)−1(Li−1) such that for every p, the section
si−1,p has an extension to a section of Li. By Lemma 1.10, we deduce that for every p,
si−1,p has an extension to a section of Li if and only if the equation of the following form
holds:
(⋄p)
ν(s0,p ⊗ [Li]) = τp.
where τp is a cohomology class in H 1(C, L) determined by the section si−1,p. In order to
prove that (Li−1, W ) is in the image of h, it suffices to show the existence of an element
Li ∈ (ρi
i−1)−1(Li−1) such that the equation (⋄p) holds for every p.
Recall that H 1(C, OC) is the dual space of H 0(C, KC), hence we identify [Li] with
a linear map H 0(C, KC) → k. By the duality between H 1(C, L) and H 0(C, KC ⊗ L−1),
we identify τp with a linear map H 0(C, KC ⊗ L−1) → k. For every p, there is a map
ms0,p : H 0(C, KC ⊗ L−1) → H 0(C, KC) taking γ ∈ H 0(C, KC ⊗ L−1) to µ0(s0,p ⊗ γ). Hence
the equation (⋄p) holds for Li for all p if and only if the composition map
H 0(C, KC ⊗ L−1)
ms0,p
֒→ H 0(C, KC)
[Li]
→ k
is equal to τp for all p.
Let Ap be the image of ms0,p. The fact that Vi ⊗ H 0(C, KC ⊗ L−1) → H 0(C, KC)
Ap in H 0(C, KC) is a direct sum. We conclude that
is injective implies that the sum Pp
there is a Cech cohomology classes [Li] satisfying (⋄p) for all p. Therefore (Li−1, W ) is in
the image of h.
Applying Lemma 2.5 and Remark 2.6 to the case i = λl − 1, we obtain
dim Sλ
λl−1,V = g(λl − 1) −
ni(λ)(g − d − 1) −
λlXi=2
ni+1(λ)ni(λ).
λl−1Xi=1
Recall that Flagκ is the variety parameterizing all weak flag variety of signature κ. We
denote by Dκ the dimension of Flagκ. It is easy to see that Flagκ is exactly the usual
flag variety of signature κ′ where κ′ is the longest decreasing subsequence of κ. Since
k1 = n2(λ) ≤ n1(λ) = l = H 0(C, L), there are only finitely many ways to get strictly
decreasing sequence with values ≤ l and length ≤ l. There are thus only finitely many
integers Dκ. Let K1 be the maximal value among these numbers. Clearly K1 only depends
on l. In particular, it is independent on m, hence lim
m→∞
K1
m = 0.
λl−1,κ =SV
Note that Sλ
Sλ
λl−1,V, where V varies over all weak flags in Flagκ. We thus
have dim Sλ
λl−1,κ ≤ max
V
{dim Sλ
λl−1,V} + K1. We have seen that ρm
λl−1(Cλ,m) ⊂ Sλ
λl−1,κ,
22
Z. Zhu
hence dim Cλ,m ≤ (m − λl + 1)g + dim Sλ
codim(Picd(C)m,L, W r
d (C)m,L) = min
λl−1,κ. For each m ≥ l, we thus have
{mg − dim Cλ,m}
≥ min
ni(λ)(g − d − 1) +
= min
λi − l)(g − d − 1) +
λ
λ ( λlXi=2
λ ((
lXi=1
ni(λ)ni+1(λ) − K1)
λl−1Xi=1
ni(λ)ni+1(λ) − K1)
λl−1Xi=1
where λ varies over the partitions in Λl,m+1 with
λi ≥ m + 1.
l−rPi=1
Note that
obtain
λl−1Pi=1
ni(λ)ni+1(λ) ≥
λlPi=1
n2
i (λ) − l2, and since lim
m→∞
l2
m = 0 = lim
m→∞
K1
m , we
inf
m→∞
≥ inf
m→∞
≥ inf
m→∞
codim(Picd(C)m,L, W r
d (C)m,L)
m + 1
min
λ ( 1
λ ( 1
m + 1 (
m + 1 (
min
lXi=1
lXi=1
λi − l)(g − d − 1) +
λi)(g − d − 1) +
λlXi=1
ni+1(λ)ni(λ) − K1!)
λl−1Xi=1
i (λ)!)
n2
By Lemma 2.9, we thus obtain
inf
m→∞
≥ inf
m→∞
= inf
m→∞
codim(Picd(C)m,L, W r
d (C)m,L)
min
m + 1
m + 1 lXi=1
λ ( 1
λ ( 1
lXi=1
m + 1
min
(l − i + 1)(λi − λi−1)(g − d − 1) +
lXi=1
(λi − λi−1)(g − d + l − i)(l − i + 1))
(l − i + 1)2(λi − λi−1)!)
For every i with 1 ≤ i ≤ l, let xi = λi − λi−1. Consider a linear function of the form
lPi=1
bixi with bi ≥ 0, defined over the region
{(x1, · · · , xl) ∈ Rl xi ≥ 0 for every i,
(l − i − r + 1)xi ≥ m + 1}.
l−rXi=1
The minimum value of this function is achieved at the vertices of this region, i.e. the
points with all the xi but one equal to 0 and
(l − i − r + 1)xi = m + 1.
l−rPi=1
Jet schemes and singularities of W r
d (C) loci
23
We thus have
(♯)
lctL(Picd(C), W r
d (C)) ≥
l−r
min
i=1 (cid:26) (l + 1 − i)(g − d − i + l)
l + 1 − r − i
(cid:27)
On the other hand, recall that one can locally define a map from Picd(C) to a
variety of matrices M(d+e+1−g)×e such that W r
d (C) is the pull back of a suitable generic
determinantal variety Y defined by e+ d + 1 −g −r minors. Let ΦL be the image of L. The
right hand side in (♯) is the log canonical threshold of the pair (M(d+e+1−g)×e, Y ) at the
point ΦL (for the formula of log canonical threshold of a generic determinantal variety,
see [Doc, Theorem 3.5.7]). We thus have lctL(Picd(C), W r
d (C)) ≤ lctΦL(M(d+e+1−g)×e, Y ),
by [Lar, Example 9.5.8], which completes the proof.
✷
3. Appendix
to show that the subsets Sλ
Let L be a line bundle in Picd(C) with l = h0(C, L). In this section, we are going
i,κ of Picd(C)i,L defined in section 2 are constructible
i,j,V as a constructible subset of a
i,V and Sλ
subsets of Picd(C)i,L. The key point is to realize eSλ
suitable product of Grassmann bundles.
Let X be a scheme and E a vector bundle of rank n over X. For every d ≤ n, we
denote by Gr(d, E) the Grassmann bundle of d-dimensional subspaces in E and by π the
projection morphism from Gr(d, E) to X. We write elements in Gr(d, E) as pairs (x, W )
where x is a point in X and W is a dimension d subspace of Ex.
Lemma 3.1. If Φ : E → F is a homomorphism of vector bundles on the scheme X, then
we have
(1) The subset IΦ := {x ∈ X Φx : Ex → Fx is an injection} is an open subset of X.
(2) If H is a subbundle of F , then the set M Φ
H := {x Φx(Ex) ⊂ Hx} is a closed subset
of X.
The proof of Lemma 3.1 is standard, so we leave it to the reader.
Recall that P is a Poincar´e line bundle on Picd(C) × C. From the definition of jet
∼= Hom(Tm, Picd(C) × C). By the
schemes, we have Picd(C)m × Cm
adjunction (‡) in section 1 for Y = Picd(C)m × Cm and X = Picd(C) × C, the identity
Ξ−→ Picd(C)×C.
map of Picd(C)m ×Cm gives an evaluation morphism Picd(C)m ×Cm ×Tm
γm−→ Cm that takes a point to the corresponding
For every m, we also have a morphism C
constant jet. We have the composition map
∼= (Picd(C) × C)m
η : Picd(C)m × C × Tm
id ×γm×id
−−−−−−→ Picd(C)m × Cm × Tm
Ξ−→ Picd(C) × C.
We denote by Bm the pull back of the line bundle P to Picd(C)m × C × Tm via η.
Recall that for every partition λ in Λl,m+1, Cλ,m is the locally closed subset
{Lm ∈ Picd(C)m,L Lm is of type λ}.
24
Z. Zhu
For every 0 ≤ i ≤ m, there is a natural map Λl,m+1 → Λl,i+1 mapping λ to λ where
: Picd(C)m,L → Picd(C)i,L maps
λk = min{λk, i + 1} for each k ≤ l. We have seen that ρm
i
Cλ,m to Cλ,i.
We now fix a partition λ ∈ Λl,m+1. We denote by Bλ,m the restriction of Bm to the
subscheme Cλ,m × C × Tm, where on Cλ,m we consider the reduced scheme structure. We
denote by p1 the projection to the first factor Picd(C)m,L ×C ×Tm → Picd(C)m,L. It is easy
to check that for every Lm ∈ Picd(C)m,L corresponding to a morphism f : Tm → Picd(C),
the restriction of Bm to the fiber of p−1
1 (Lm) ∼= C × Tm is (f × idC)∗(P) ∼= Lm.
Recall that for every i with 0 ≤ i ≤ m, there is a closed embedding ιm
i
: Ti ֒→ Tm.
Let
νm
i
: Cλ,m × C × Ti ֒→ Cλ,m × C × Tm
be the induced embedding. Let Dλ,i be the sheaf p1∗(νm
i )∗(Bλ,m) on Cλ,m. Consider
the function Cλ,m → Z that takes Lm to h0(C × Ti, Li), where Li is the image of Lm in
∼= Picd(C × Ti). Lemma 1.8 implies that this function is constant on Cλ,m. By
Picd(C)i
i )∗(νm
the Base Change Theorem, we deduce that Dλ,i is a locally free sheaf of rank
nj(λ) on
i+1Pj=1
Cλ,m, whose fiber over a point Lm is H 0(C, Li). For every i and j with 0 ≤ j ≤ i ≤ m,
the embedding map νm
i . We thus have a natural morphism of sheaves
j
factors through νm
(νm
i )∗(νm
i )∗(Bλ,m) → (νm
j )∗(νm
j )∗(Bλ,m)
on Cλ,m × C × Tm. Applying (p1)∗ to it, we obtain a vector bundle map
Φi
j : Dλ,i → Dλ,j
on Cλ,m whose restriction to the fiber over {Lm} is the truncation map
πi
j : H 0(Li) → H 0(Lj).
For a fixed partition λ ∈ Λl,m+1, we consider κ = (κ1, · · · , κm) a signature with
kj ≤ nj+1(λ) for every j ≤ m. For every i ≤ m, a point in the fiber product of Grassmann
bundles
Gλ,i,κ := Gr(κ1, Dλ,1) ×Cλ,m · · · ×Cλ,m Gr(κi, Dλ,i)
dimension κj subspace of (Dλ,j)Lm
H 0(C, L) of signature κ, we denote by P λ
over Cλ,m is written as an (m + 1) -- tuple (Lm;eV1, · · · ,eVi), where Lm ∈ Cλ,m and eVj is a
m,i,V the subset of points (Lm;eV1, · · · ,eVi) ∈ Gλ,i,κ,
where Lm ∈ Cλ,m and {eV1, . . . ,eVi} is a compatible extension of V(i) to the line bundle
m,i,V, where V varies over all weak flags of H 0(C, L) of
∼= H 0(Lj) for every j ≤ i. For every weak flag V of
Li. We also write P λ
P λ
m,i,κ for SV
signature κ.
Recall that Flagκ is the variety parameterizing weak flags of H 0(C, L) of signature
m,i,κ the subset of points
κ. We denote by eP λ
where V′ ∈ Flagκ and (Lm;eV1, · · · ,eVi) ∈ P λ
(Lm;eV1, · · · ,eVi; V′) ∈ Gλ,i,κ × Flagκ
m,i,V′.
Jet schemes and singularities of W r
d (C) loci
25
Lemma 3.2. Let λ ∈ Λl,m+1 and κ be a signature of length m with κj ≤ nj+1(λ) for
m,i,κ is a constructible subsets of
every 1 ≤ j ≤ m. Then for every i with 1 ≤ i ≤ m, eP λ
Gλ,i,κ × Flagκ.
Proof. For simplicity, we write X for the scheme Gλ,i,κ × Flagκ. For j with 1 ≤ j ≤ i,
we denote by pj the projection X onto Gr(κj, Dλ,j) and by pi+1 the projection of X
onto Flagκ. For a fixed j with 1 ≤ j ≤ i, we denote by qj : Gr(κj, Dλ,j) → Cλ,m. The
composition map
does not depend on a particular choice of j for j ≤ i. We denote it by χ.
X
pj−→ Gr(κj, Dλ,j)
qj−→ Cλ,m
For every j with 1 ≤ j ≤ i, we denote by Tj the tautological subbundle of q∗
j (Dλ,j)
j (Dλ,j) = χ∗(Dλ,j). Hence
on Gr(κj, Dλ,j). Let Tj = p∗
j Tj and Fj be the vector bundle p∗
j q∗
Tj is a subbundle of Fj for each j. Over a point x = (Lm;eV1, · · · ,eVi; V′) ∈ X, we have
Tj,x = eVj and Fj,x is H 0(Lj) where Lj is the image of Lm under Picd(C)m,L → Picd(C)j,L.
For every k and j with 0 ≤ k ≤ j ≤ i, we write Ψj
k for the composition Tj ֒→ Fj → Fk.
of Rj over a point V′ = {V ′
Let R1 ⊇ R2 ⊇ · · · ⊇ Rm be the tautological flag bundles on Flagκ, where the fiber
j . We write Rj for the pull back of Rj via
j } ∈ Flagκ
we have Rj,x = V ′
j . Note that D0 is the trivial vector bundle on Cλ,m with fiber H 0(C, L).
Hence F0 is a trivial bundle on X with fiber H 0(C, L). It implies that Rj is a subbundle
of F0.
pi+1 : X → Flagκ. Over a point x = (Lm;eV1, · · · ,eVi; V′) ∈ X, where V′ = {V ′
n}n in Flagκ is V ′
With the notation in Lemma 3.1, we have
This completes the proof.
m,i,κ =
eP λ
(IΨj
0
i\j=1
∩ M
Ψj
j−1
Tj−1 ∩ M Ψj
Rj )
0
(cid:3)
Corollary 3.3. With the notation in Lemma 3.2, let V be a weak flag of H 0(C, L) of
signature κ. For every i with 1 ≤ i ≤ m, P λ
m,i,V are both constructible subsets
of Gλ,i,κ.
m,i,κ and P λ
Proof. We denote by pr1 and pr2 the projections of Gλ,i,κ × Flagκ onto Gλ,i,κ and Flagκ,
respectively. We thus deduce that P λ
m,i,κ under pr1, is a constructible
subset of Gλ,i,κ. It is clear that P λ
2 (V) under pr1. Lemma
2 (V) is a constructible subset of Gλ,i,κ × Flagκ. This completes
(cid:3)
m,i,κ, as the image of eP λ
m,i,V is the image of eP λ
m,i,κ ∩ pr−1
m,i,κ ∩ pr−1
3.2 implies that eP λ
the proof.
Corollary 3.4. Let κ be a signature of length m with kj ≤ nj+1(λ) for every j ≤ m, and
V ∈ Flagκ. For every i with 1 ≤ i ≤ m, the subsets Sλ
i,V are constructible subset
of Picd(C)i,L.
i,κ and Sλ
26
Z. Zhu
Proof. For a fixed i, let κ be a signature of length i such that κj = κj for every j ≤ i.
Recall that λ is the image of λ under Λl,m+1 → Λl,i+1. By the definition of Sλ
i,κ, we have
Sλ
i,κ = Sλ
i,κ for every i ≤ m. It suffice to prove the assertion in case i = m.
Recall that χ is the morphism of projection Gλ,m,κ → Cλ,m. The fact that Sλ
the image of Pm,m,κ under χ and Corollary 3.3 shows that Sλ
of Picd(C)m,L. The assertion for Sλ
i,V is proved similarly.
m,κ is
m,κ is a constructible subset
(cid:3)
Lemma 3.5. eSλ
i,j,V is a constructible subset of the Grassmann bundle Gr(κj, Di) on Cλ,i.
The proof of this lemma is similar to those of Lemma 3.2 and Corollary 3.3, hence
we leave it to the reader.
References
[ACGH] E. Arbarello, M. Cornalba, P.A. Griffiths and J.Harris, Geometry of Algebraic Curves I,
Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, A series of Comprehensive Studies in Mathe-
matics, vol 267, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985. 4, 17, 18
[Doc] R. Docampo ´Alvarez, Arcs on Determinantal Varieties, Ph.D. Thesis, Univeristy of Illinois at
Chicago, 2009, arxiv: math/1011.1930v2. 3, 23
[Elk] R. Elkik, Rationalit´e des singularit´es canoniques, Invent. Math. 64, 1981, 1-6. 19
[EL] L. Ein, R. Lazarsfeld, Singularities of theta divisors and the birational geometry of irregular vati-
eties, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 10 (1997), 243 -- 258. 1
[EMY] L. Ein, M. Mustat¸a and T. Yasuda, Jet schemes, log discrepancies and inversion of adjunction,
Invent. Math. 153, (2003),519 -- 535. 2, 19
[Gie] D. Gieseker, Stable curves and special divisors, Invent. Math. 66 (1982), 251 -- 275. 19
[Har] R. Hartshorne, Algebraic Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 52, Springer-Verlag, New
York, 1977.
[Kem] G. Kempf, On the geometry of a theorem of Riemann, Ann. of Math. 98 (1973), 178 -- 185. 1, 17
[Lar] R. Lazarsfeld, Positivity in Algebraic Geometry II, Positivity for Vector Bundles, and Multiplier
Ideals,Ergebnisse der Mathematik und Grenzgebiete, 3, Folge, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004. 23
[Mum] D. Mumford, Lectures on Curves on an Algebraic Surface, Annals of Mathematics Studies, 59,
Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1966.
[Mus1] M. Mustat¸a, Jet schemes of locally complete intersection canonical singularities, with an appendix
by David Eisenbud and Edward Frenkel, Invent. Math., 145 (2001), 397 -- 424. 2, 17, 18
[Mus2] M. Mustat¸a, Singularities of pairs via jet schemes, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 15 (2002), 599 -- 615. 2, 19
Department of Mathematics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
E-mail address: [email protected]
|
math/0701874 | 4 | 0701 | 2011-02-04T15:36:34 | On the geometry of $\bar{S}_2$ | [
"math.AG"
] | We investigate topological properties of the moduli space of spin structures over genus two curves. In particular, we provide a combinatorial description of this space and give a presentation of the (rational) cohomology ring via generators and relations. | math.AG | math |
ON THE GEOMETRY OF S2
GILBERTO BINI AND CLAUDIO FONTANARI
Abstract. We investigate topological properties of the moduli space
of spin structures over genus two curves.
In particular, we provide a
combinatorial description of this space and give a presentation of the
(rational) cohomology ring via generators and relations.
The authors warn the reader that an erratum to the present paper has
been kindly posted on arXiv by Sebastian Krug.
1. Introduction
The moduli space Sg of spin curves of genus g has been introduced in [13]
in order to compactify the moduli space of pairs
(smooth genus g complex curve C, theta-characteristic on C) .
The interest in this space has been increasing in the last few years due
to a wide spectrum of applications, which range from Mathematical Physics
to Arithmetic Geometry passing through Algebraic Geometry and Combi-
natorics (see, for instance, [1], [7], [9], [10], [11], [12], [20], [23]).
Nonetheless, very little is known about the topological properties of Sg.
The first results in this direction can be found in [17] and [18].
In these
pioneering articles, the stability of the homology groups and some low degree
cohomology groups of Sg are investigated.
In the present paper, we compute the virtual cohomological dimension of
Sg (see Lemma 2.2). Next, we focus on the compactification Sg, especially
on the first relevant case g = 2.
In particular, we determine the Hodge
diamond of S2 (see Proposition 3.5) and describe the cohomology ring of S2
via generators and relations (see Theorem 3.12 and Theorem 3.13).
At first sight, it might seem that the topology of the moduli space of
spin curves is not really different from that of the moduli space of stable
curves.
In fact, the constructions of these two spaces do not differ in a
substantial way. On the other hand, Sg turns out to have a richer geometric
structure, which requires a more careful analysis. Indeed, Sg is the union
of two connected components, S
g , which correspond to even and
odd spin curves, respectively. In the case g = 2, we separately investigate
the cohomology of each component and discover two non-isomorphic ring
structures.
+
g and S
−
In order to accomplish this task, we combine an inductive approach in-
spired by [2] with direct calculations in the style of [22]. This leads us to
introduce suitable moduli spaces of pointed spin curves and to address sev-
eral related problems. In particular, we obtain an explicit affine stratification
of S2 (see Appendix A).
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 14H10, 14E08.
1
2
GILBERTO BINI AND CLAUDIO FONTANARI
Thanks are due to Maurizio Cornalba for helpful conversations on the
subject of this research and to Katharina Ludwig for pointing out a mistake
in a previous version of the present paper. The authors are deeply grateful
to the referee for careful reading of the manuscript and patient advice on
how to improve it (see for instance Remark 3.6).
An erratum to the present paper has been kindly posted on arXiv by Se-
bastian Krug (see [25]).
Throughout we work over the field C of complex numbers.
2. The moduli space of curves with spin structures
In this section, we recall some basic definitions about spin structures.
Here we follow closely [13], to which we refer for more details. For a more
general approach see, for instance, [1].
Let X be a Deligne-Mumford semistable curve and let E be a complete,
irreducible subcurve of X. The curve E is said to be exceptional when it is
smooth, rational, and intersects the other components in exactly two points.
Moreover, X is said to be quasi-stable when any two distinct exceptional
In the sequel, X will denote the subcurve
components of C are disjoint.
X \ ∪Ei obtained from X by removing all the exceptional components.
A spin curve of genus g (see [13], § 2) is the datum of a quasi-stable
genus g curve X with an invertible sheaf ζX of degree g − 1 on X and
a homomorphism of invertible sheaves αX : ζ ⊗2
X −→ ωX such that i) ζX
has degree 1 on every exceptional component of X, and ii) αX is not zero
at a general point of every non-exceptional component of X. Therefore,
αX vanishes identically on all exceptional components of X and induces an
isomorphism αX : ζ ⊗2
X X −→ ω X. In particular, when X is smooth, ζX is just
a theta-characteristic on X. Two spin curves (X, ζX , αX ) and (X ′, ζX ′, αX ′)
are isomorphic if there are isomorphisms σ : X → X ′ and τ : σ∗(ζX ′) → ζX
such that τ is compatible with the natural isomorphism between σ∗(ωX ′)
and ωX.
A family of spin curves is a flat family of quasi-stable curves f : X → S
with an invertible sheaf ζf on X and a homomorphism αf : ζ ⊗2
f −→ ωf such
that the restriction of these data to any fiber of f gives rise to a spin curve.
Two families of spin curves f : X → S and f ′ : X ′ → S are isomorphic
if there are isomorphisms σ : X −→ X ′ and τ : σ∗(ζf ′) −→ ζf such that
f = f ′◦σ and τ is compatible with the natural isomorphism between σ∗(ωf ′)
and ωf .
Let Sg be the moduli space of isomorphism classes of spin curves of genus
g. Denote by Sg the open subset consisting of classes of smooth curves. As
shown in [13], § 5, Sg has a natural structure of analytic orbifold given as
follows. For any spin curve X, there is a neighbourhood U of [X] such that
U ∼= BX/Aut(X), where BX is a 3g − 3-dimensional polydisk and Aut(X)
is the automorphism group of the spin curve X. Alternatively, Sg may be
viewed as a projective normal variety with finite quotient singulaties.
The moduli space of spin curves can be slightly generalized as follows.
For all integers g, n, m1, . . . , mn, such that 2g − 2 + n > 0, 0 ≤ mi ≤ 1 for
every i, and Pn
i=1 mi is even, we define
ON THE GEOMETRY OF S 2
3
(m1,...,mn)
g,n
S
:= n[(C, p1, . . . , pn; ζ; α)] : (C, p1, . . . , pn) is a genus g
quasi-stable projective curve with n marked points;
ζ is a line bundle of degree g − 1 +
1
2
n
Xi=1
mi on C having
degree 1 on every exceptional component of C, and
n
α : ζ ⊗2 → ωC(
Xi=1
mipi) is a homomorphism which
is not zero at a general point of every non-exceptional
component of Co.
In order to put an analytic structure on S
(m1,...,mn)
g,n
, we notice that Cor-
(m1,...,mn)
g,n
. Indeed,
nalba's construction in [13] can be easily adapted to S
from the universal deformation of the stable model of (C, p1, . . . , pn) we ob-
tain exactly as in [13], § 4, a universal deformation UX → BX of X =
(C, p1, . . . , pn; ζ; α). Next, we put on S
the structure of of the quo-
tient analytic space BX/ Aut(X) following [13], § 5. Alternatively, we can
as the coarse moduli space associated to the stack of r-
regard S
spin curves (in the easiest case r = 2), which has been constructed by Jarvis
in [19] and revisited by Abramovich and Jarvis in [1].
(m1,...,mn)
g,n
(m1,...,mn)
g,n
Analogously to Sg (see [13], Proposition 5.2), the spaces S
are
normal projective varieties of complex dimension 3g − 3 + n. If m1 = . . . =
mn = 0, then Sg,n := S
splits into two disjoint irreducible components
g,n that consist of the even and the odd spin curves, respectively
S
(see [13], Lemma 6.3). Similarly to Lemma 1 in [7], we point out the follow-
ing
+
g,n and S
(0,...,0)
g,n
−
(m1,...,mn)
g,n
Proposition 2.1. Let Pic(S
natural isomorphism
(m1,...,mn)
g,n
) := H 1(S
(m1,...,mn)
g,n
, O∗). There is a
Pic(S
(m1,...,mn)
g,n
) ⊗ Q
∼=−→ A3g−4+n(S
(m1,...,mn)
g,n
) ⊗ Q.
Proof. Since S
(m1,...,mn)
g,n
is normal, there is an injection:
Pic(S
(m1,...,mn)
g,n
) ⊗ Q ֒→ A3g−4+n(S
(m1,...,mn)
g,n
) ⊗ Q.
Moreover, from the construction of S
(m1,...,mn)
g,n
it follows that the singu-
larities of S
Q-Cartier and there is a surjective morphism:
(m1,...,mn)
g,n
are of finite quotient type, so every Weil divisor is
Pic(S
(m1,...,mn)
g,n
) ⊗ Q → A3g−4+n(S
(m1,...,mn)
g,n
) ⊗ Q.
Hence the claim follows.
(cid:3)
We end this section with some results on the topology of Sg, which will
be applied in the next Section when g = 2. In what follows, all homology
and cohomology groups are intended to have rational coefficients.
4
GILBERTO BINI AND CLAUDIO FONTANARI
Let us recall some general notions from [16], § 4. A group Γ is virtually
torsion-free if it has a subgroup G of finite index which is torsion free. If
Γ is virtually torsion free, the virtual cohomological dimension of Γ is the
cohomological dimension of a torsion free subgroup G of finite index in Γ.
A theorem of Serre states that this number is independent of the choice of
G (see [16], p. 173).
It is well-known that the mapping class group Γg is virtually torsion-free
(see for instance [16], p. 172). Moreover, Harer proved that the virtual
cohomological dimension of Γg is 4g − 5 (see [16], Theorem 4.1). Since
the Teichmuller space Tg is contractible, the rational homology of Mg and
Γg is the same, so the group Hk(Mg, Q) is zero for k > 4g − 5 (see [16],
Corollary 4.3).
Let now S be a smooth orientable surface of genus g and let Q be a Z/2Z-
quadratic form on H1(S, Z/2Z). The isomorphism class of Q is determined
by its Arf invariant ε = 0 or 1 (see [17], p. 324). Call Q0 (resp. Q1) the
even (resp. the odd) quadratic form and let Gg(Qi) be the subgroup of the
mapping class group Γg which preserves Qi. Then the following holds:
Lemma 2.2. For i = 0, 1, Gg(Qi) is virtually torsion-free and its virtual
cohomological dimension is 4g − 5.
Proof. Let χ : Γg −→ Sp(2g, Z/2Z) be the following homomorphism. The
image under χ of an isotopy class [γ] of orientation-preserving diffeomor-
phism of S is the automorphism induced by γ on H1(S, Z/2Z) (see [3],
Chapter 14, (2.1)). Since the target group is finite, the kernel K of χ has
finite index in Γg.
It is a straightforward consequence of the definitions
that K ⊆ Gg(Qi), hence we may deduce that Gg(Qi) has finite index in
Γg. Now, pick a torsion-free subgroup H of Γg of finite index and consider
Gi := H ∩ Gg(Qi). Since both H and Gg(Qi) have finite index in Γg, it
follows that Gi has finite index in Γg. Since H is torsion-free, we have that
Gi is torsion-free. As mentioned before, all torsion-free subgroups of finite
index in Γg have the same cohomological dimension. Therefore, from the
previous two facts and Harer's theorem we may deduce that the cohomolog-
ical dimension of Gi is 4g − 5. Since Gi has finite index in Γg, it has finite
index in Gg(Qi) too. Thus, it computes the virtual cohomological dimension
of Gg(Qi).
Recall that Sg is the disjoint union of S+
even theta-characteristics, and S−
characteristics. Further, we have S+
(see [17], p. 324). Analogously to Mg, the following holds.
(cid:3)
g , which contains curves with
g , which contains those with odd theta-
g = Tg/Gg(Q1)
g = Tg/Gg(Q0) and S−
Theorem 2.3. We have Hk(Sg) = 0 for k > 4g − 5.
3. The Rational cohomology of S2
In this section, we specialize to the case g = 2 and we investigate the
additive and multiplicative structure of the cohomology algebra of S2. Let
ν : S2 → M2 be the morphism which forgets the spin structure and passes
to the stable model. It is a 16 : 1 ramified covering of normal threefolds.
Denote by ν+ : S
2 → M2) the restriction of ν to
+
2 → M2 (resp. ν − : S
−
ON THE GEOMETRY OF S 2
5
the moduli space of curves with even spin structures S
structures S
−
2 ).
+
2 (resp. odd spin
Remark 3.1. The stratification of S2 by topological type is affine. Indeed,
as shown in [22], the stratification of M2 by graph type is affine and since ν
is finite and preserving topological type, S2 turns out to be stratified as the
union of affine subvarieties.
For an explicit description of the stratification in Remark 3.1, see Appen-
dix A.
Theorem 3.2. We have H 1(S2) = H 3(S2) = 0.
Proof. Consider the following morphisms:
(1)
f + : M0,6 −→ S
f − : M0,6 −→ S
+
2 ,
−
2 .
In order to define f + and f −,
let (C; p1, . . . p6) be a 6-pointed, sta-
ble, genus zero curve. The morphism f + (respectively f −) associates to
(C; p1, . . . p6) the admissible covering Y of C which is branched at the pi's.
Generically, it comes equipped with the line bundle OY (q1 + q2 − q3) (re-
spectively OY (q1)), where qi denotes the point of Y lying above pi, and the
morphism extends to the boundary since M0,6 is normal and S2 is finite
over M2.
By (1), we have
H k(S2) ֒→ H k(M0,6).
The claim follows from [21] since H k(M0,n) = 0 for every n and every
odd k.
(cid:3)
−
In order to determine H 2(S2), we first look at algebraic cycles of codi-
mension one in S2. We recall that the boundary ∂S g = Sg \ Sg is the union
of the irreducible components A+
i (con-
tained in S
g ), which are completely described in [13], § 7, by their general
members:
• A+
i ), i > 0: two smooth components C1 and C2 of genera
i and g − i, joined at points p ∈ C1 and q ∈ C2 by a P1, with even
(resp. odd) theta-characteristics on C1 and C2
i (contained in S
i (resp. B+
+
g ) and A−
i , B+
i , B−
• A−
i
(resp. B−
i ), i > 0: as above, but with an even (resp. odd)
theta-characteristic on C1 and an odd (resp. even) one on C2
• A+
0 (resp. A−
0 ): an irreducible curve of genus g with only one node,
with an even (resp. odd) spin structure
• B+
0 (resp. B−
0 ): an irreducible curve of genus g with only one node,
blown up at the node (so to add an exceptional component E ∼= P1),
with an even (resp. odd) spin structure glued to OE(1) on E.
i , β+
Let α+
0, 1. In [13], p. 585, the class β−
i denote the corresponding classes in A3g−4(Sg) for i =
1 is defined to be zero, hence we always
i , α−
i , β−
6
GILBERTO BINI AND CLAUDIO FONTANARI
omit it. We point out that the arguments provided in [13] in order to prove
Proposition 7.2 imply that α+
i are independent for g = 2, too.
i , β+
i , α−
i , β−
Proposition 3.3. The Chow group A2(S2) is generated by boundary classes.
Proof. By restricting f + (resp. f −) over S+
2 ), we obtain finite
surjective morphisms from M0,6 to S2. By [21], A2(M0,6) is generated by
boundary classes. Thus, the exact sequence
2 (resp. S−
A2(M0,6 \ M0,6) → A2(M0,6) → A2(M0,6)
yields A2(M0,6) = 0. By [14], Lemma A, we conclude that A2(S2) = 0, so
the map A2(S2 \ S2) → A2(S2) is onto.
(cid:3)
Next, we are going to prove that the whole cohomology of S2 is indeed
algebraic. In order to do so, we need the following auxiliary result.
Lemma 3.4. S
(m1,...,mn)
1,n
is a unirational variety for n ≤ 2.
Proof. Since the structure sheaf is the unique odd theta-characteristic on an
∼= M1,n for every n, and M1,n is rational
elliptic curve, we have S
for n ≤ 10, as shown in [6]. Next, we are going to define three surjective
morphisms by defining them generically as in the proof of Theorem 3.2. The
first one is
(0,...,0),−
1,n
h4 : M0,4 −→ S
(0),+
1,1
.
Let (C; p1, p2, p3, p4) be a 4-pointed stable genus zero curve. If E is the
admissible covering of C that is branched at the pi's and qi denotes the
preimage of pi under such covering, then the morphism h maps the pointed
curve (C; p1, p2, p3, p4) to (E; q1) with the even theta-characteristic OE(q1 −
q2).
In a similar fashion, we define a second morphism as follows:
h5 : M0,5 −→ S
(0,0),+
1,2
.
Let (C; p1, p2, p3, p4, p) be a 5-pointed stable genus zero curve. The image
under h5 is the pointed curve (F ; r1, r) with the even theta-characteristic
OF (r1 − r2). The curve F is the admissible covering of C that is branched
at the points pi's. The point ri is the preimage of pi, while the point r is
one of the two points in the preimage of p. Notice that a different choice
will yield the same point in S
. Finally, we have a third surjective
morphism
(0,0),+
1,2
t5 : M0,5 −→ S
(1,1)
1,2
,
which is defined as follows. With the same notation used for h5, the image
under t5 of (C; p1, p2, p3, p4, p) is given by (E; r2, r3) with the odd theta-
characteristic OE(r1). The points r2 and r3 lie in the preimage of p under
t5. Note that the pointed curve (E; r3, r2) and OE(r1) will yield the same
element in S
.
(1,1)
1,2
Since the moduli spaces M0,n are rational, the claim is completely proved.
(cid:3)
ON THE GEOMETRY OF S 2
7
Proposition 3.5. The Hodge diamond of S2 is given by
0
>>>>>>>
0
0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
0
0
0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
2
7
7
2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
0
0
0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
0
0
>>>>>>>
0
Figure 3: The Hodge Diamond of S2
Proof. By Theorem 3.2 and Proposition 3.3, all we need to show is that
h2,0(S2) = 0. As recalled in Remark 3.1, each connected component of S2 is
an affine variety. Hence, Hk(S2) = 0 for k ≥ dim(S2) + 1 = 4. By Poincar´e
duality, we have H k
c (S2) = 0 for 0 ≤ k ≤ 2. By the exact sequence
. . . → H k
c (S2) → H k(S2) → H k(∂S2) → . . .
we get an injective morphism H k(S2) → H k(∂S2), which is compatible
with the Hodge structures (exactly as in [2], p. 102); so there is an injection
H p,0(S2) ֒→ H p,0(∂S2) for p ≤ 2. Notice that each irreducible component of
(0,0)
∂S2 is the image of a map from either S1,1 × S1,1 or S
. Analo-
1,2
gously to Lemma 2.6 in [2], it suffices to check that hp,0(S
n ≤ 2. By Lemma 3.4, we get a dominant rational map Pn 99K S
Thus, as in [15], p. 494, we have an injective morphism H p,0(S
H p,0(Pn). In particular, h2,0(S2) = 0, and the claim follows.
) = 0 for
(m1,...,mn)
1,n
or S
(m1,...,mn)
1,n
(m1,...,mn)
1,n
(1,1)
1,2
.
) ֒→
Remark 3.6. As pointed out by the referee, the vanishing of h2,0(S2) is also
a direct consequence of (1) and the rationality of M0,6.
(cid:3)
Theorem 3.7. The rational cohomology of S2 is algebraic. In particular,
the following hold:
i) a basis for the cohomology group H 2(S2) is given by the boundary classes
α+
i , α−
ii) a basis for the cohomology group H 4(S2) is given by the products ∆α+
i ,
∆α−
i , where ∆ is the sum of all boundary classes.
i , ∆β+
i , ∆β−
i , β−
i ;
i , β+
8
GILBERTO BINI AND CLAUDIO FONTANARI
Proof. By the standard exponential sequence, we have a long exact sequence
. . . → H 1(S2, O)⊗Q → H 1(S2, O∗)⊗Q → H 2(S2, Q) → H 2(S2, O)⊗Q → . . .
By Proposition 3.5 we have H 1(S2, O)⊗ Q = (0) = H 2(S2, O)⊗ Q. Hence
the (rational) cohomology group H 2(S2) is isomorphic to P ic(S2)⊗Q. Thus,
i) follows from Proposition 2.1 and Proposition 3.3. As for ii), note that ∆
is ample because S2 is affine (cfr. Remark 3.1). Accordingly, multiplication
by ∆ induces an isomorphism between H 2(S2) and H 4(S2) by the Hard
Lefschetz Theorem, which holds in the category of projective orbifolds - see
[24], Theorem 1.13. By Theorem 3.2, the claim is completely proved.
(cid:3)
Corollary 3.8. A∗(S+
2 ) ∼= A∗(S−
2 ) ∼= Q.
+
2 (the classes with superscript +) and S
Remark 3.9. Theorem 3.7 gives generators for the rational cohomology of
2 (the classes with superscript −).
S
Corollary 3.10. The Euler characteristic of the normal variety S2 is 18.
In particular, e(S
+
2 ) = 10 and e(S
2 ) = 8.
−
−
0 , α−
1 (resp. α−
0 , α+
1 (resp., A−
For the ring structure of H ∗(S2), we need some results on the cohomology
of genus one spin curves. Denote by α+
1 ) the (Poincar´e)
dual cohomology class of the loci A+
0 , A+
1 ) in S1,n described
above in the case n = 0 (the only difference here is that the rational com-
ponent of the general member carries n marked points). Next, define by λ+
1
(resp. λ−
1,n) of the cohomology class λ on
M1,n. Clearly, these classes can be expressed in terms of boundary divisors.
+
In fact, we have λ = 1
12 δirr on M1,n. Moreover, the space S
1,1 is isomorphic
+
to P1 and if γ+
1,2 → M1,2 is the 3 : 1 covering of M1,2, then we have
(γ+
1,2 : S
1,2)∗(δirr) = 3α+
1 ) the pull-back on S
+
1,n (resp. S
0 . Hence,
0 , A−
−
(2)
λ+
1 =
1
4
Remark 3.11. We have (λ+
1 )2 = (λ−
[6], Lemma 3.2.6, δ2
pull-back of a point in M1,1 ∼= P1 via the natural forgetful morphism.
Indeed, as pointed out in
irr = 0 on M1,n since the boundary divisor ∆irr is the
1
12
1 )2 = 0.
λ−
1 =
α+
0 ,
α−
0 .
Theorem 3.12. The cohomology ring H ∗(S
ring Q[α+
elements:
+
2 ) is isomorphic to the quotient
1 ]/J +, where J + is the ideal generated by the following
0 , β+
0 , α+
1 , β+
1 β+
α+
1 ,
0 β+
β+
1 ,
α+
0 α+
1 − β+
0 α+
1 ,
α+
0 α+
,
1 (cid:1)2
1 + 8(cid:0)α+
0 )2α+
1 ,
(α+
α+
0 β+
1 + 24(β+
1 )2,
4(β+
0 )2 + 8α+
1 β+
0 − 3α+
0 β+
0 ,
(α+
1 , β+
0 )2β+
0 ,
0 β+
3(α+
0 )3 + 22(α+
0 )2β+
1 .
1 β+
Proof. The relations α+
1 follow immediately from the definition of
β+
1 . In fact, the intersection of the corresponding cycles are empty by parity
reasons (for instance, if B+
1 were non-empty, then it would be one-
dimensional and its general element should carry an even theta characteristic
0 ∩ B+
ON THE GEOMETRY OF S 2
9
restricting to an even one on the genus 0 component and to an odd one to
the genus 1 component, which is clearly impossible).
Let θ be the boundary map
(3)
θ : S
+
1,1 × S
+
1,1 → S
+
2
defined as follows. A point in the domain is the datum of two 1-pointed
genus one curves with even spin structures. The image point is obtained by
glueing the two curves along the two marked points and then blowing-up
the node. The exceptional component C is given a spin structure via OC(1).
We have
1
2
1 =
0 (cid:1) α+
0 − β+
(cid:0)α+
θ∗(cid:0)θ∗(cid:0)α+
0 (cid:1) = 0. Indeed, the classes α+
0 + α+
0 − β+
0 ⊗ 1 − 1 ⊗ β+
0 ⊗ 1 = 0.
0 − β+
0 (cid:1)(cid:1) = 0
0 and β+
since θ∗(cid:0)α+
0 − β+
P1, hence 1 ⊗ α+
0 coincide on S
+
1,1
∼=
We recall from [22], p. 321, that 10λ = δirr + 2δ1 on M2. We denote by
+
λ+
2 the pull-back of λ on S
2 . By [13], Proposition (7.2), i) and ii), we have
(ν+)∗(δirr) = α+
1 , hence we obtain
(4)
0 + 2β+
λ+
2 =
0 and (ν+)∗(δ1) = 2α+
0 + 4β+
0 + 2β+
(α+
1
10
1 + 2β+
1 + 4α+
1 (cid:1)2
5 (cid:0)α+
1 + 2
1 ).
On the one hand, we get λ+
by applying the
previous relations. On the other hand, if we recall (2) and apply the push-
pull formula we see that
1 = 3
10 α+
0 α+
2 α+
(5)
λ+
2 α+
1 =
=
1
2
1
8
θ∗ (θ∗(λ2)) =
0 α+
α+
1 .
1
2
θ∗(cid:0)λ+
1 ⊗ 1 + 1 ⊗ λ+
1 (cid:1)
Thus, the codimension two relation α+
As shown in [22], p. 321, the following relation holds in H 4(M2):
1 (cid:1)2
1 + 8(cid:0)α+
= 0 holds.
0 α+
(6)
λδ1 =
1
12
δirrδ1.
By subtracting (6), the pull-back of (6) yields λ+
1 + 4α+
0 β+
2 β+
1 β+
1 = 1
1 + 4(β+
(4), the class λ+
codimension two relation
2 β+
1 is also equal to 1/10(cid:0)α+
1 + 24(β+
α+
0 β+
(7)
1 )2 = 0
1 . By
0 β+
12 α+
1 )2(cid:1); so the
follows. Notice that
3(cid:16)α+
0 α+
1 + 8(cid:0)α+
1 (cid:1)2(cid:17) + α+
0 β+
1 + 24(β+
1 )2 = 0
is the pull-back of δirrδ1 + 12δ2
1 on M2, which is zero - see [22], p. 321.
In order to compute the last relation, let η be the boundary map
η : S
+
1,2 → S
+
2
which is defined as follows. A point in the domain is the datum of a two
pointed genus one curve with an even spin structure. The corresponding
image point is obtained by glueing the two marked points and blowing-
up the node. The resulting quasi-stable curve is given a spin structure
10
GILBERTO BINI AND CLAUDIO FONTANARI
via the spin structure of the domain curve plus OF (1) on the exceptional
component F . By definition we have β+
4 η∗(1). Notice that the order
of the automorphism group of a generic curve in the image of η is four. By
(2), we have
0 = 1
(8)
λ+
2 β+
0 =
By (4), the class λ+
1
4
1 (cid:1) =
η∗(cid:18) 1
0 (cid:19) =
1
η∗(cid:0)λ+
α+
4
0 is also equal to 1/10(cid:0)α+
2 β+
4
0 β+
α+
0 .
1
4
0 β+
0 + 2(β+
0 )2 + 4α+
1 β+
0 (cid:1).
Hence, the last codimension two relation follows.
Let us now determine the codimension three relations. By (8), we get
(λ+
2 )2β+
0 =
1
4
λ+
2 β+
0 α+
0 =
1
16
(α+
0 )2(β+
0 ).
2 )2α+
0 = (λ+
We remark that (λ+
2 )2β+
0 and β+
+
1,2, which is zero by Remark 3.11. This yields (α+
0 = 0. Indeed, restricting (λ+
0 is equivalent to computing (λ+
2 )2 to
the divisors corresponding to α+
1 )2
0 ) = 0. By
on S
plugging (4) in this last identity, we get (α+
1 = 0. This, together with
the codimension two relations above, yields that all degree three monomials
+
2 ) vanish except for (α+
1 )2. By (7), we have
in H 6(S
1 )2α+
(β+
0 = − 1
0 = 0, we get 3(α0)3+
22(α+
1 = 0.
1 , α+
1 . Finally, by the relation (λ+
0 (β+
2 )2α+
0 )3, (α+
0 )2(β+
0 )2α+
0 )2β+
0 )2β+
24 α+
0 β+
1 , β+
A calculation with computer program Macaulay [5] yields that the ring
0 , α+
1 ]/J + is finite dimensional and has Betti numbers 1, 4, 4, 1.
+
2 ) and the Betti numbers coincide, they
Q[α+
Since this ring surjects onto H ∗(S
are isomorphic.
0 , β+
Notice in particular that (α+
0 )2β+
1 = 5
4 [p], where [p] is the class of a point
on S
+
2 . This follows from the intersection number δ3
1 = 1
576 on M2.
(cid:3)
Theorem 3.13. The cohomology ring H ∗(S
ring Q[α−
polynomials:
2 ) is isomorphic to the quotient
0 ]/J −, where J − is the ideal generated by the following
0 , α−
1 , β−
−
3(β−
0 )2 + 6α−
1 β−
0 − α−
0 β−
0 ,
2α−
1 β−
0 − α−
1 α−
0 ,
12(α−
1 )2 + α−
1 α−
0 ,
(α−
0 )2β−
0
3(α−
0 )3 + 32α−
1 (α−
0 )2.
Proof. Analogously to (8), we can prove that
(9)
λ−
2 β−
0 =
1
6
α−
0 β−
0
where λ−
2 is the pull-back of λ to S
10 (cid:0)α−
λ−
2 =
1
−
2 , hence we have
0 + 2β−
0 + 4α−
1 (cid:1) .
If we multiply by β−
1 β−
0 − α−
0 = 0 holds.
0 β−
6α−
0 and compare with (9), we get the relation 3(β−
0 )2 +
ON THE GEOMETRY OF S 2
11
+
1,1 × S
−
1,1 → S
−
2 . Since
Similarly to (3), define the boundary map ι : S
α+
0 = β+
0 on S
β−
0 α−
∼= P1, we have:
+
1,1
0 (cid:1) = ι∗(cid:0)β+
1 = ι∗ι∗(cid:0)β−
0 (cid:1)(cid:1) − ι∗(cid:0)1 ⊗ α−
= ι∗(cid:0)ι∗(cid:0)α−
α−
0 α−
1 .
0 ⊗ 1(cid:1) = ι∗(cid:0)α+
0 ⊗ 1(cid:1)
1 − ι∗(cid:0)1 ⊗ α−
0 α−
0 (cid:1) = α−
0 (cid:1)
=
1
2
0 ) = 1
2 α−
0 α−
Note that ι∗(1 ⊗ α−
generic curve in the intersection of the divisors corresponding to α−
has order two. Hence, the codimension two relation 2α−
0 − α−
follows. Finally, if we pull-back δirr δ1 + 12δ2
2α−
1 . In fact, the automorphism group of the
0 and α−
1
0 α−
1 = 0
1 )2 +
2 , we get 48(α−
1 α−
If we use the codimension two relations, we obtain the following relations
0 , which yields the relation 12(α−
1 )2 + α−
0 + 4α−
1 on S
0 = 0.
1 α−
1 β−
1 β−
−
in codimension three:
1 (α−
1 )3 − α−
144(α−
0 )2 = 0,
54(β−
0 )3 − 6(α−
0 )2β−
0 + 45α−
1 (α−
0 )2 = 0,
12(α−
1 )2α−
0 + α−
1 (α−
0 )2 = 0,
24(α−
1 )2β−
0 + α−
1 (α−
0 )2 = 0,
α−
0 (β−
0 )2 + α−
1 (α−
0 )2 = 0,
4(β−
0 )2α−
1 − (α−
0 )2α−
1 = 0,
2α−
1 α−
0 β−
By Remark 3.11, we have (λ−
2 = 1
0 )2β−
0 = 0. If we plug in λ−
(α−
use the relations above, we also have 3(α−
0 − α−
2 )2β−
10 (cid:0)α−
1 (α−
0 = (λ−
0 + 2β−
0 )2 = 0.
2 )2α−
0 + 4α−
0 )3 + 32α−
0 = 0. By (9), we get
1 (cid:1) in (λ−
0 = 0 and
0 )2 = 0.
1 (α−
2 )2α−
0 , α−
A calculation with computer program Macaulay [5] yields that the quo-
0 ]/J − is finite dimensional and has Betti numbers
2 ) and the Betti numbers coin-
tient ring Q[α−
1, 3, 3, 1. Since this ring surjects onto H ∗(S
cide, they are isomorphic.
Finally, notice that α−
1 , β−
1 (α−
0 )2 = 3
−
2 . This follows easily from the intersection number δirrδ2
16 [q], where [q] is the class of a point
48 on
(cid:3)
1 = − 1
−
on S
M2.
appendix A
We recall that the moduli space of stable curves has a natural stratification
by topological type. An explicit description in genus 2 can be found in [22]:
there are seven strata ∆Gi, which correspond to the graphs Gi in Figure 1.
We shall list the components of ν −1 (∆Gi) by describing their general
member.
The preimage of ∆G1 yields two strata, namely S+
The eight strata of the preimages ν −1(∆G2) and ν −1(∆G3) are described
g and S−
g .
in [13]. Their closures are denoted by A+
j , A−
j , B+
j , B−
j .
The preimage ν −1(∆G4) is the union of the following strata:
• C +: an irreducible curve with two nodes and an even spin structure;
• C −: an irreducible curve with two nodes and an odd spin structure;
12
GILBERTO BINI AND CLAUDIO FONTANARI
2G 1
G 2
1
1
1
G 3
G 4
1
G 5
G 6
G 7
Figure 1. Graph-types.
Figure 2. Curves in C + and C −.
• D+: a rational irreducible curve with two nodes - blown-up at one of them
- with an even spin structure;
• D−: as above, but with an odd spin structure;
Figure 3. Curves in D+ and D−.
• E: a rational irreducible curve with two nodes - blown-up at both nodes
- with an even spin structure.
The preimage ν −1(∆G5) is the disjoint union of the following strata:
• X +: a smooth elliptic curve F1 and an irreducible nodal curve F2 - joined
via a smooth rational curve at two points y1 and y2 - with even theta-
characteristics on F1 and F2;
• X −: as above, but with an even theta-characteristic on F1 and an odd
theta-characteristic on F2;
ON THE GEOMETRY OF S 2
13
Figure 4. Curves in E.
• Y +: as above, but with odd theta-characteristics on F1 and F2;
• Y −: as above, but with an odd theta-characteristic on F1 and an even
theta-characteristic on F2;
y1
y
2
F
1
F
2
Figure 5. Curves in X +, X −, Y + and Y −.
• Z +: an irreducible nodal curve T2 (blown-up at the node) and a smooth
elliptic curve T1 - joined via a smooth rational curve - with an even theta-
characteristic on T1 and an even spin structure on T2;
• Z −: as above, but with an odd theta-characteristic on T1 and an even spin
structure on T2.
y 1
T
1
y 2
T
2
Figure 6. Curves in Z + and Z −.
The preimage ν −1(∆G6) has seven strata, i.e.,
• L+: two smooth rational curves that intersect in three points (blown-up
at one of them) with an even spin structure1;
• L−: as above, but with an odd spin structure;
• M : two smooth rational curves K1 and K2 that intersect in three points
p1, p2, p3 (blown-up at the intersection points) with an even spin structure.
1Notice that blowing-up at a different point yields an isomorphic spin curve.
14
GILBERTO BINI AND CLAUDIO FONTANARI
Figure 7. Curves in L+ and L−.
K
1
K
2
Figure 8. Curves in M .
The preimage ν −1(∆G7) has seven strata (points), i.e.,
• P +: two irreducible nodal curves C1 and C2 of (arithmetic) genus 1 -
joined at points p and q by a smooth rational curve - with an even theta-
characteristics on C1 and C2;
• Q+: as above, but with odd theta-characteristics on C1 and C2;
• P − = Q−: as above, but with an odd theta-characteristic on C1 and an
even theta-characteristic on C2;
• R: two irreducible curves with one node (each of them blown-up at the
p
1
C
1
p
2
C
2
Figure 9. Curves in P +, Q+ and P − = Q−.
node) that are joined by a smooth rational curve at two distinct points, with
an even spin structure;
• U +: an irreducible curve V2 with one node (blown-up at the node) and
an irreducible nodal curve V1 of arithmetic genus one - joined via a smooth
rational curve at two distinct points - with an even theta-characteristic on
V1 and an even spin structure on V2;
• U −: as above, but with an odd theta-characteristic on V1 and an even
spin one on V2.
ON THE GEOMETRY OF S 2
15
p
1
p
2
C
1
C
2
Figure 10. Curves in R.
p
1
p
2
C
1
C
2
Figure 11. Curves in U + and U −.
References
[1] D. Abramovich and T. J. Jarvis: Moduli of twisted spin curves. Proc. Amer. Math.
131 (2003), 685 -- 699.
[2] E. Arbarello, M. Cornalba: Calculating cohomology groups of moduli spaces of curves
via algebraic geometry. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. 88 (1998), 97 -- 127.
[3] E. Arbarello, M. Cornalba, P. Griffiths, J. Harris: Geometry of Algebraic Curves.
Vol. I. Grund. der Math. Wiss., 267, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985.
[4] E. Arbarello, M. Cornalba, P. Griffiths, J. Harris: Geometry of Algebraic Curves.
Vol. II. In preparation.
[5] D. Bayer, M. Stillman: Macaulay - a software system for algebraic geometry and com-
mutative algebra. Available at http://www.math.columbia.edu/∼bayer/Macaulay.
[6] P. Belorousski: Chow rings of moduli spaces of pointed elliptic curves. Ph.D Disser-
tation, Chicago, 1998.
[7] G. Bini, C. Fontanari: Moduli of curves and spin structures via algebraic geometry.
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 358 (2006), 3207 -- 3217.
[8] M. Boggi, M. Pikaart: Galois covers on moduli of curves. Comp. Math. 120 (2000),
171 -- 191.
[9] C. Casagrande, L. Caporaso: Combinatorial properties of stable spin curves. Comm.
in Algebra: Special issue in Honor of Professor Steven Kleiman. 31 (2003), 3653 -- 3672.
[10] C. Casagrande, L. Caporaso, M. Cornalba: Moduli of roots of line bundles on curves.
Preprint math.AG/0404078. To appear in Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.
[11] A. Chiodo: Roots of
line bundles on curves and N´eron models. Preprint
math.AG/0603689.
[12] A. Chiodo:
Stable
twisted curves and their
r-spin structures. Preprint
math.AG/0603687.
[13] M. Cornalba: Moduli of curves and theta-characteristics. In: Lectures on Riemann
surfaces (Trieste, 1987), 560 -- 589, Teaneck, NJ: World Sci. Publishing, 1989.
[14] C. Faber: Chow rings of moduli spaces of curves. I. The Chow ring of M3. Ann. of
Math. 132 (1990), 331 -- 419.
[15] P. Griffiths and J. Harris: Principles of Algebraic Geometry. New York: John Wiley
and Sons, Inc., 1978.
16
GILBERTO BINI AND CLAUDIO FONTANARI
[16] J. Harer: The virtual cohomological dimension of the mapping class group of an
orientable surface. Inv. Math. 84 (1986), 157 -- 176.
[17] J. Harer: Stability of the homology of the moduli spaces of Riemann surfaces with
spin structure. Math. Ann. 287 (1990), 323 -- 334.
[18] J. Harer: The rational Picard group of the moduli space of Riemann surfaces with spin
structure. Mapping class groups and moduli spaces of Riemann surfaces (Gottingen,
1991/Seattle, WA, 1991), Contemp. Math. 150 (1993), 107 -- 136.
[19] T. J. Jarvis: Geometry of the moduli of higher spin curves. Internat. J. Math. 11
(2000), 637 -- 663.
[20] T. J. Jarvis, T. Kimura, A. Vaintrob: Moduli spaces of higher spin curves and inte-
grable hierarchies. Comp. Math. 126 (2001), 157 -- 212.
[21] S. Keel: Intersection theory of moduli space of stable n pointed curves of genus zero.
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 330 (1992), 545 -- 574.
[22] D. Mumford: Towards an enumerative geometry of the moduli space of curves,
Progress in Math. (1983), 271 -- 328.
[23] M. Pacini, Spin structures over non stable curves. Preprint math.AG/0602420.
[24] J. H. M. Steenbrink: Mixed Hodge structure on the vanishing cohomology. Real and
complex singularities (Proc. Ninth Nordic Summer School/NAVF Sympos. Math.,
Oslo, 1976), 525 -- 563. Sijthoff and Noordhoff, Alphen aan den Rijn, 1977.
[25] S. Krug: Rational cohomology of R2 (and S 2). arXiv:1012.5191 (2010).
E-mail address: [email protected]
Current address: Dipartimento di Matematica, Universit`a degli Studi di Mi-
lano, Via C. Saldini 50, 20133 Milano, Italy.
E-mail address: [email protected]
Current address: Dipartimento di Matematica, Politecnico di Torino, Corso
Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy.
|
1006.1306 | 1 | 1006 | 2010-06-07T17:40:15 | On essentially large divisors | [
"math.AG",
"math.CV",
"math.NT"
] | Motivated by the classical Theorems of Picard and Siegel and their generalizations, we define the notion of an {\it essentially large} effective divisor and derive some of its geometric and arithmetic consequences. We then prove that on a nonsingular projective variety $X$ whose codimension is no greater than $\dim X-2$, every effective divisor with $\dim X +2$ or more components in general position is essentially large. | math.AG | math | ON ESSENTIALLY LARGE DIVISORS
GORDON HEIER AND MIN RU
Abstract. Motivated by the classical Theorems of Picard and Siegel
and their generalizations, we define the notion of an essentially large
effective divisor and derive some of its geometric and arithmetic con-
sequences. We then prove that on a nonsingular projective variety X
whose codimension is no greater than dim X − 2, every effective divisor
with dim X + 2 or more components in general position is essentially
large.
.
G
A
h
t
a
m
[
1
v
6
0
3
1
.
6
0
0
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
1. Introduction
In [CZ02], Corvaja and Zannier found an innovative way of using
Schmidt's Subspace Theorem to give a new proof of the classical Theorem
of Siegel on integral points on affine varieties. They subsequently expanded
their approach to obtain certain results on integral points in higher dimen-
sions ([CZ03], [CZ04b], [CZ04a], [CZ06b]). The approach was translated to
Nevanlinna theory in [Ru04].
Evertse and Ferretti ([Fer00], [EF02]) used similar (yet more general) ar-
guments to obtain diophantine inequalities on projective varieties. Their
approach is largely based on Mumford's degree of contact. In Nevanlinna
theory, this approach was used by Ru [Ru09] to establish a Second Main
Theorem for holomorphic curves into projective varieties intersecting hyper-
surfaces.
As stated in [Lev09, p. 609], the article [CZ02] motivated Levin to make
the following Definition. Its significance is due to the hyperbolicity-type and
Mordell-type properties enjoyed by the complements of large divisors. We
let K denote either a number field or C.
Definition 1.1 ([Lev09, Definition 8.1]). Let D be an effective divisor on a
nonsingular projective variety X defined over K. Then D is said to be very
large if for every P ∈ D( ¯K), there exists a basis B of the finite-dimensional
vector space
L(D) = {f rational function on X div(f ) ≥ −D}
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 11G35, 11G50, 14C20, 14G40, 32H30.
1
2
GORDON HEIER AND MIN RU
such that ordEQf∈B f > 0 for every irreducible component E of D with
P ∈ E( ¯K). Moreover, an effective divisor is said to be large if it has the
same support as some very large divisor.
Recall that for an effective divisor D as in the above Definition, the finite-
dimensional vector spaces L(D) and H 0(X, OX (D)) are isomorphic via
(1)
H 0(X, OX (D)) → L(D),
s 7→
where sD is a section of OX(D) with div(s) = D.
s
sD
,
i=1 Di with Di effective (but not necessarily irre-
ducible), Levin's main sufficient criterion for very largeness is the following.
i=1 Di be a divisor with
each Di effective (but not necessarily irreducible) on a nonsingular projective
For a divisor D = Pr
Lemma 1.2 ([Lev09, Lemma 9.1]). Let D = Pr
variety X, all defined over K. For P ∈ D( ¯K), let DP =P{i:P∈Di} Di. Also,
If there exists n > 0 such that P∞m=0(m − n)fP (m, n) > 0 for all P ∈ D( ¯K),
fP (m, n) = h0(X, OX (nD − mDP )) − h0(X, OX (nD − (m + 1)DP )).
for integers m, n, let
then nD is very large.
The short proof provided in [Lev09] is based on the filtration argument
introduced in [CZ02]. The main idea is to define a filtration
Vj = H 0(X, OX (nD − jDP ))
(j = 0, 1, 2, 3, . . .)
of H 0(X, OX (nD)) and to choose a basis f1, . . . , fh0(X,OX (nD)) of L(nD)
according to this filtration, beginning with the last nonzero subspace. Since
dim Vj/Vj+1 = fP (j, n), we get
ordE
h0(X,OX (nD))
Yi=1
fi ≥ (ordE D)
∞
Xm=0
(m − n)fP (m, n) > 0.
The main result on large divisors in [Lev09] is the following.
variety, defined over K. Let D = Pr
Theorem 1.3 ([Lev09]). Let X be a q-dimensional nonsingular projective
i=1 Di be a divisor, also defined over
K, with each Di effective (but not necessarily irreducible) and big and nef.
Moreover, assume that every irreducible component of D is nonsingular and
that the intersection of any m + 1 distinct Di is empty over ¯K. If r > 2mq,
then D is large.
In the proof of
the difference
h0(X, OX (nD − mDP )) − h0(X, OX (nD − (m + 1)DP )) is bounded from
above based on the H 0-part of the corresponding long exact cohomology
this Theorem given in [Lev09],
ON ESSENTIALLY LARGE DIVISORS
3
sequence. As remarked by Levin, using the double filtration argument from
[CZ04b, Lemma 3.2], the factor of 2 in the lower bound on r can be removed.
It would of course be interesting to decrease the lower bound on r in
Theorem 1.3. In light of the classical Theorems of Picard and Siegel and
their generalizations, and some of the standard conjectures in hyperbolicity
theory, one might suspect that when m = q, the lower bound of 2mq can
be replaced by q + 1. However, it is quite clear that the sufficient criteria in
[Lev09] cannot be used to prove this. To be precise, we make the following
Remark.
Remark 1.4. In the situation of Lemma 1.2, let X = Pq. Let D be the
sum of r general smooth hypersurfaces of degree d. Then
(m − n)fP (m, n) > 0 (n sufficiently large)
∞
Xm=0
if and only if r > q2 + q.
We leave the proof of Remark 1.4 as an exercise to the reader. Note that
since Pic(Pq) is generated by OPq (1) and since h0(Pq, OPq (ℓ)) = (cid:0)q+ℓ
dimensions of all the H 0's involved can be computed without problem.
ℓ (cid:1), the
We now turn to the new results presented in this note. The starting point
is our definition of essentially (very) large divisors as follows.
Definition 1.5. Let D be an effective divisor on a nonsingular projective
variety X, all defined over K. Then we define D to be essentially very large
if there exists a linear subspace V of L(D) such that for every P ∈ D( ¯K),
there exists a basis B of V such that ordEQf∈B f > 0 for every irreducible
component E of D with P ∈ E( ¯K). Moreover, we define an effective divisor
to be essentially large if it has the same support as some essentially very
large divisor.
This is obviously a weakening of the notion of large divisors, which re-
quires V = L(D). However, our definition seems technically easier to handle,
while it retains the important function theoretic and number theoretic con-
sequences of the original definition of large divisors derived in [Lev09]. In
fact, in Section 2, we prove new inequalities of Second Main Theorem-type
and Schmidt Subspace Theorem-type for essentially large divisors that are
actually stronger than the consequences for large divisors derived in [Lev09].
Since the statements of our Theorems require some (standard) definitions,
we simply refer the reader to Theorem 2.2 and Theorem 2.6 at this point of
the Introduction.
4
GORDON HEIER AND MIN RU
As a matter of convention, we will always assume that the constant func-
tion 1 is an element of the basis B, although it does not contribute to the
vanishing of the product.
Remark 1.6. The reader might wonder how essential very largeness fits
in with the standard notions of "size" for a divisor in algebraic geometry.
In this paper, we will not make any statements in this respect, other than
the trivial observation that a basis for V yields a nonconstant rational map
to projective space whose locus of indeterminacy (i.e., the base locus of V
understood as a subspace of H 0(X, OX (D))) is contained in D.
In a second line of inquiry, beginning in Section 3, it is clearly interesting
to ask for (sharp) sufficient criteria for a divisor to be essentially large. In
this direction, we first discovered that the filtration method from [CZ04a]
(see also [Ru04]) yields the expected sharp bound (even for the original ver-
sion of largeness) in the case of X = Pq as stated in the following Theorem.
(Cf. our comments in Remark 1.4.)
Theorem 1.7. Let q ≥ 1 and r ≥ q +2 be integers. On Pq, let D =Pr
i=1 Di
be a divisor defined over K, where each Di is a hypersurface (not necessarily
irreducible or reduced). Assume that the Di are in general position, i.e., the
intersection of any q + 1 of them is empty over ¯K. Then D is large.
In the case of nonsingular projective varieties different from projective
space, our result is the following.
Theorem 1.8. Let q ≥ 1 and r ≥ q + 2 be integers. Let X ⊆ Pℓ be a
nonsingular projective variety of dimension q defined over K. Let D =
i=1 Di be a divisor on X such that each Di is defined by the restriction
to X of a homogeneous polynomial of degree di in K[X0, . . . , Xℓ]. Finally,
assume that the Di are in general position on X, i.e., the intersection of X
with any q + 1 of them is empty over ¯K. Then D is essentially large.
Pr
While the assumptions in Theorem 1.8 are certainly restrictive, they cor-
respond exactly to the current state-of-the-art for generalized geometric ver-
sions of the Second Main Theorem (see [Ru09]).
It seemed to be an interesting problem to find a broad class of projective
varieties to which Theorem 1.8 can actually be applied. This is treated in
Section 4, where we obtain the following Theorem, which is repeated as
Corollary 4.2.
Theorem 1.9. Let q ≥ 1 and r ≥ q + 2 be integers. Let X ⊆ Pℓ be a
nonsingular projective variety of dimension q, defined over K. Assume that
i=1 Di be an effective divisor on X defined over
K such that the Di are in general position. Then D is essentially large.
2q − ℓ ≥ 2 holds. Let D =Pr
ON ESSENTIALLY LARGE DIVISORS
5
In closing this Introduction, we conjecture that the bound on the number
of components in Theorem 1.9 is generally the correct one, regardless of the
codimension of X:
Conjecture 1.10. Let q ≥ 1 and r ≥ q + 2 be integers. Let X ⊆ Pℓ
be a nonsingular projective variety of dimension q, defined over K. Let
i=1 Di be an effective divisor, defined over K, on X such that the Di
are big and in general position. Then D is essentially large.
D =Pr
2. The geometric and arithmetic properties of essentially
large divisors
2.1. The geometric case. We first derive the inequality of Second Main
Theorem-type for essentially very large divisors. We begin by recalling some
standard definitions from Nevanlinna Theory.
Let g : C → Pm be a holomorphic map. Let g = [g0, . . . , gm] be a reduced
representative of g, where g0, . . . , gm are entire functions on C and have
no common zeros. The Nevanlinna-Cartan characteristic function (or the
height function) Tg(r) is defined by
Tg(r) =
1
2π Z 2π
0
log max
j=0,...,m
gj(re
√−1θ)dθ.
The above definition is independent, up to an additive constant, of the choice
of the reduced representation of g.
For a divisor D on a projective variety X, represented by a local defining
function ρ, and a holomorphic map g : C → X, the counting function is
defined as
Ng(r, D) =Z r
0
ng(t, D) − ng(0, D)
t
dt + ng(0, D) log r,
where ng(t, D) is the number of zeros of ρ ◦ g inside z < t (counting mul-
tiplicities), and ng(0, D) = limt→0+ ng(t, D).
By the Jensen formula, we also have
Ng(r, D) = Xa∈Dr\{0}
orda(ρ ◦ g) log(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)
r
a(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)
+ ord0(ρ ◦ g) log r.
The following generalized version of Cartan's Second Main Theorem (see
[Ru97], [Voj97]) will be the basis of the proof of Theorem 2.2. Note that by
k k we mean the (coefficient-wise) maximum norm in this Subsection.
Theorem 2.1. Let f = [f0 : . . . : fm] : C → Pm be a holomorphic map
whose image is not contained in a proper linear subspace. Let H1, . . . , Hq
6
GORDON HEIER AND MIN RU
be arbitrary hyperplanes in Pm. Let Lj, 1 ≤ j ≤ q, be linear forms defining
H1, . . . , Hq. Then, for every ε > 0,
Z 2π
0
max
K
log Yj∈K
kf (re√−1θ)kkLj k
Lj(f (re√−1θ)
dθ
2π
. ≤ .(m + 1 + ε)Tf (r),
where ". ≤ ." means that the inequality holds for all r outside of a set Γ
with finite Lebesgue measure, and the maximum is taken over all subsets K
of {1, . . . , q} such that the linear forms Lj, j ∈ K, are linearly independent.
To prove our result, we need a general formula for the height Tg(r) when
g = [g0 : . . . : gm], where g0, . . . , gm are meromorphic functions (i.e., it is not
necessarily the reduced representation of g). According to [Lan87, p. 202],
such a formula reads
+ max
j=0,...,m
(− ord0(gj)) log r,
Tg(r) =Z 2π
0
log max
j=0,...,m
gj(re
√−1θ)
dθ
2π
− log max
j∈A
cgj
+ Xa∈Dr\0
max
j=0,...,m
(− orda(gj)) log(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)
r
a(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)
where log maxj∈A cgj is a correction term that makes the definition in-
dependent of multiplication by a nowhere zero holomorphic function (see
[Lan87] for full details).
Our main result in this Subsection is the following inequality of Second
Main Theorem-type. According to the subsequent Corollary 2.3, it can be
understood from the geometric point of view as a quantitative version of the
Chern hyperbolicity of the complement of an essentially large divisor.
Theorem 2.2. Let D be an essentially very large divisor on a nonsingular
complex projective variety X. Let V be a linear subspace of L(D) as in
Definition 1.5. Let φ0, . . . φm be an arbitrary basis for V . Let f : C → X be
an algebraically nondegenerate holomorphic map. Let Φ be the rational map
[φ0 : . . . : φm] : X → Pm, and write
F = Φ ◦ f : C → Pm.
When E1, . . . , Eℓ denote the irreducible components of D, let
M = max{− ordEi(φj) i = 1, . . . , ℓ, j = 0, . . . , m}.
Then, for every ǫ > 0,
TF (r). ≤ .(M (m + 1) + 1 + ǫ)Nf (r, D),
where ". ≤ ." means that the inequality holds for all r outside of a set Γ with
finite Lebesgue measure.
Note that since Φ is nonconstant and f is algebraically nondegenerate,
the map F also is nonconstant.
ON ESSENTIALLY LARGE DIVISORS
7
Corollary 2.3. Let D be an essentially large divisor on a nonsingular com-
plex projective variety X. Then every holomorphic map f : C → X \ D
must be algebraically degenerate, i.e., the image of f must be contained in
a proper subvariety of X. In other words, X \ D is Chern hyperbolic (aka
quasi Brody hyperbolic).
Proof of Corollary 2.3. Since the statement of the Corollary only refers to
the support of D, we can assume that D is essentially very large. Assume
that f : C → X \ D is algebraically nondegenerate. Since f omits D,
Nf (r, D) = 0. So the above inequality implies that TF (r) is bounded outside
of a set of finite Lebesgue measure. However, since F is nonconstant, this is
false and gives a contradiction.
(cid:3)
Proof of Theorem 2.2. It is easy to see ([Lev09, Remark 8.2]) that there
exists a finite set J of elements in V such that for every P ∈ D there exists
a subset I ⊂ J that is a basis of V with ordEQf∈I f > 0 when E is a
component of D with P ∈ E. Let J′ be the set of linear forms L in m + 1
variables such that L ◦ Φ ∈ J.
According to Theorem 2.1,
Z 2π
0
max
I
logYL∈I
kF (re√−1θ)kkLk
L(F (re√−1θ))
dθ
2π
. ≤ .(m + 1 + ε)TF (r),
where the maximum is taken over subsets I ⊂ J′ such that I consists of
exactly m + 1 independent linear forms.
Since the left-hand side is independent of the choice of the representation
of F , we can rewrite the above inequality as
Z 2π
0
max
I
logYL∈I
max0≤j≤m φj(f (re√−1θ))
L(F (re√−1θ))
dθ
2π
. ≤ .(m + 1 + ε)TF (r) + O(1),
where O(1) is introduced by dropping the factor kLk after assuming that a
fixed choice of coefficients has been made.
Next, we observe that since D is essentially very large, outside of the
support of the divisor D, we have
√−1θ))
1
M min
φj(f (re
(2)
max
j
L(F (re
√−1θ)) ≤ C,
I YL∈I
where C is some constant. The reason is that we can cover X by a finite
number of open sets on each of which φj minI(QL∈I L ◦ Φ)M is bounded
for each j = 0, . . . , m. Namely, for P ∈ X, define UP as follows.
If
P 6∈ D, take a small neighborhood UP of P such that its closure is dis-
joint from the support of D. Since the φj have no poles outside of the
8
GORDON HEIER AND MIN RU
If P ∈ D, take UP to
support of D, the boundedness on UP is obvious.
be a small neighborhood of P with the property that Q ∈ E ∩ UP implies
P ∈ E for all components E of D. Consequently, by the essential very
L ◦ Φ) is a positive integer
largeness, there exists I0 such that ordE(QL∈I0
and ordE(cid:0)φj minI (QL∈I L ◦ Φ)M(cid:1) ≥ 0 for all j = 0, . . . , m. Perhaps after
shrinking UP , this implies that φj minI (QL∈I L ◦ Φ)M is bounded on UP
for every j = 0, . . . , m. Finally, since X is compact, we can cover it with a
finite number of open sets of the form UP .
Applying log to both sides of (2) yields
φj(f (re
√−1θ))
log max
j
1
M + log min
I YL∈I
Therefore,
L(F (re
√−1θ)) ≤ log C.
φj(f (re
√−1θ))m+1+ 1
M ≤ max
I
maxj φj(f (re√−1θ))
L(F (re√−1θ))
+ log C.
logYL∈I
log max
j
Thus
Z 2π
0
φj(f (re
√−1θ))dθ
log max
j
=
M
M (m + 1) + 1Z 2π
0
log max
j
≤
M
M (m + 1) + 1 Z 2π
0
max
I
logYL∈I
. ≤ .
M (m + 1 + ǫ)
M (m + 1) + 1
√−1θ))m+1+ 1
φj(f (re
maxj φj(f (re√−1θ))
M dθ
L(F (re√−1θ))
dθ + log C!
TF (r) + O(1).
Recall that from Lang's formula [Lan87, p. 202],
TF (r) =Z 2π
0
log max
j
φj(f )(re
√−1θ)
dθ
2π
− log max
j∈K
cφj (f )
+ Xa∈Dr\0
+ max
j=0,...,m
max
j=0,...,m
(− orda(φj(f ))) log(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)
(− ord0(φj(f ))) log r.
r
a(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)
Thus,
TF (r). ≤ .
M (m + 1 + ǫ)
M (m + 1) + 1
TF (r) + Xa∈Dr\0
max
j=0,...,m
(− orda(φj(f ))) log(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)
r
a(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)
+ max
j=0,...,m
(− ord0(φj(f ))) log r + O(1).
ON ESSENTIALLY LARGE DIVISORS
9
Recall that due the isomorphism (1), there are sections s0, . . . , sm ∈
H 0(X, OX (D)) such that φj = sj
sD
. Therefore, for all a ∈ Dr,
max
j
(− orda(Fj)) = max
j
(− orda(φj ◦ f ))
= max
j (cid:18)− orda(cid:18) sj
sD
◦ f(cid:19)(cid:19)
= orda(sD ◦ f ) − min
orda(sj ◦ f )
j
Consequently, we obtain
1 − ǫ
M (m + 1) + 1
≤ orda(sD ◦ f ).
TF (r). ≤ . Xa∈Dr\{0}
orda(sD ◦ f ) log(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)
r
a(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)
+ ord0(sD ◦ f ) log r + O(1)
=Nf (r, D) + O(1).
Since TF (r) is unbounded for r → ∞ outside of a set of finite Lebesgue
measure, we can, after perhaps enlarging Γ, continue to estimate as follows,
where δ is any positive number.
Nf (r, D) + O(1)
. ≤ .Nf (r, D) + δTF (r).
We can now subtract δTF (r) from both sides of the inequality and then di-
1−ǫ
M (m+1)+1 −δ. Choosing small enough ǫ and δ (depending
vide both sides by
on ǫ) concludes the proof.
(cid:3)
2.2. The arithmetic case. We now derive an inequality of Schmidt Sub-
space Theorem-type for essentially large divisors. We again begin by recall-
ing some standard definitions.
Let k be a number field of degree d. Denote by Mk the set of places
(equivalence classes of absolute values) of k and write M∞k
for the set of
archimedean places of k. In an archimedean class υ, we choose the absolute
value υ such that υ = on Q (the standard absolute value). For a
nonarchimedean class υ ∈ Mk \ M∞k , we let pυ = p−1 if υ lies above the
rational prime p.
Denote by kυ the completion of k with respect to υ and by dυ = [kυ : Qυ]
. We have the product formula: for every
the local degree. Let υ = dυ /d
x ∈ k∗,
υ
kxkυ = 1.
Yυ∈Mk
10
GORDON HEIER AND MIN RU
For Q = [x0, . . . , xm] ∈ Pm
the logarithmic height of Q by
k , let kQkυ = max1≤i≤m kxikυ. Moreover, define
h(Q) = Xυ∈Mk
log kQkυ.
By the product formula, its definition is independent of the choice of the
representations.
We now come to the notion of a Weil function. Let X be a projective
nonsingular variety and D be an effective divisor on X, both defined over a
number field k. Extend k kυ to an absolute value on the algebraic closure ¯kυ
for all υ ∈ Mk. Then a (local) Weil function for D relative to υ is a function
λD,υ : X(¯kυ) \ Supp(D) → R such that if D is represented locally by (f ) on
an open set U , then
λD,υ(P ) := − log kf (P )kυ + α(P ),
where α(P ) is a continuous function on U (¯kυ). We sometimes think of λD,υ
as a function of X(k) \ Supp(D) or X(¯k) \ Supp(D) by simply choosing an
embedding ¯k → ¯kυ.
Given a finite set S ⊂ Mk containing all archimedean places, define the
proximity function mS(x, D) by, for x ∈ X(¯k) \ Supp(D),
(3)
mS(x, D) =
1
[k : Q]Xυ∈S
λD,υ(x).
The counting function NS(x, D) is defined by
(4)
NS(x, D) =
1
[k : Q]Xυ6∈S
λD,υ(x).
Note that the sum above is still a finite sum, since the terms all vanish
except for finitely many.
Definition 2.4. A subset Σ of X(¯k) \ Supp(D) is (D, S)-integral if there
is a Weil function λD for D and constants cυ ∈ R for all υ 6∈ S such that
cυ = 0 for almost all cυ = 0 and λD,υ(P ) ≤ cυ for all υ 6∈ S and P ∈ Σ. In
other words, a subset Σ of X(¯k) \ Supp(D) is (D, S)-integral if and only if
NS(x, D) is bounded over Σ.
We recall the following generalized version of Schmidt's Subspace Theo-
rem from [Voj89].
Theorem 2.5. Let k be a number field with its set of canonical places
Mk. Let S ⊂ Mk be a finite set containing all archimedean places. Let
H1, . . . , Hm be hyperplanes in Pn defined over ¯k with corresponding Weil
ON ESSENTIALLY LARGE DIVISORS
11
functions λH1, . . . , λHm. Then there exists a finite union of hyperplanes Z,
depending only on H1, . . . , Hm (and not k, S), such that for any ǫ > 0,
Xυ∈S
λHi,υ(P ) ≤ (n + 1 + ǫ)h(P )
max
I Xi∈I
holds for all but finitely many P ∈ Pn \ Z, where the maximum is taken
over subsets I ⊂ {1, . . . , m} such that the linear forms defining Hi, i ∈ I,
are linearly independent.
Our main result in this Subsection is the following inequality of Schmidt
Subspace Theorem-type for essentially large divisors.
Theorem 2.6. Let D be an essentially very large divisor on a nonsingular
projective variety X, both defined over a number field k. Let V be a linear
subspace of L(D) as in Definition 1.5. Let φ0, . . . φm be an arbitrary basis
for V and let Φ be the rational map [φ0 : . . . : φm] : X → Pm. Let S ⊂ Mk be
a finite set of places containing all archimedean ones. Then for every ǫ > 0,
h(Φ(P )). ≤ .(M (m + 1) + 1 + ǫ)NS(P, D),
where ". ≤ ." means that the inequality holds for all P ∈ X(k) outside a
Zariski closed variety Z of X.
Proof. Let I be defined as in the proof of Theorem 2.2. Due to arguments
analogous to those that gave the boundedness (2), we have for P ∈ X(k)
not contained in the support of D:
m+1+ 1
log kφj(P )k
M
υ
max
j
Xυ∈S
≤Xυ∈S
max
I
logYL∈I
maxj kφj(P )kυ
kL(Φ(P ))kυ
+ log C,
for some constant C.
constants with the same symbol C.
In the sequel, we will denote abuse and denote all
By Theorem 2.5, for all P ∈ X(k) outside a Zariski closed variety Z of
X,
Hence
Now,
Xυ∈S
max
I
logYL∈I
maxj kφj(P ))kυ
kL(Φ(P ))kυ
. ≤ .(m + 1 + ǫ)h(Φ(P )).
m+1+ 1
log kφj(P )k
M
υ
. ≤ .(m + 1 + ǫ)h(Φ(P )) + log C.
max
j
Xυ∈S
h(Φ(P )) = Xυ∈S
max
j
log kφj(P )kυ +Xυ6∈S
max
j
log kφj(P )kυ.
12
GORDON HEIER AND MIN RU
We again use the fact that, due to the isomorphism (1), there are sections
s0, . . . , sm ∈ H 0(X, OX (D)) such that φj = sj
, j = 0, . . . , m, where sD is
sD
a section of OX (D) with div(s) = D. Moreover, we think of a section s of
OX(D) as given by a collection (sβ) of functions pertaining to an open cover
(Uβ) such that sβ = hβγsγ on Uβ ∩ Uγ, where hβγ are the nowhere vanishing
transition functions of OX (D).
If P ∈ Uβ(¯kυ), then we can write
kφj(P )kυ =
ksj,β(P )kυ
ksD,β(P )kυ
independently of β. Thus
Xυ∈S
max
j
log kφj(P )kυ −Xυ6∈S
log
ksD,β(P )kυ
maxj ksj,β(P )kυ
= h(Φ(P )).
From the definition of the Weil-function λD,υ(P ), since D is represented by
sD,β on Uβ,
λD,υ(P ) = − log ksD,β(P )kυ + α(P ),
where α is continuous on Uβ(¯kυ). Since log maxj ksj,β(P )kυ is bounded from
above on Uβ(¯kυ), there exists a constant Cβ such that
− log
ksD,β(P )kυ
maxj ksj,β(P )kυ
= − log ksD,β(P )kυ + log max
j
ksj,β(P )kυ
≤ − log ksD,β(P )kυ + α(P ) + Cβ
=λD,υ(P ) + Cβ.
Therefore
So we have
Xυ∈S
max
j
log kφj(P )kυ +Xυ6∈S
λD,υ(P ) + C ≥ h(Φ(P )).
(cid:18)m + 1 +
1
M(cid:19) h(Φ(P )) ≤Xυ∈S
m+1+ 1
log kφj(P )k
M
υ
max
j
+(cid:18)m + 1 +
1
M(cid:19)Xυ6∈S
λD,υ(P ) + C
. ≤ .(m + 1 + ǫ)h(Φ(P )) +(cid:18)m + 1 +
1
M(cid:19)Xυ6∈S
λD,υ(P )
+ C.
ON ESSENTIALLY LARGE DIVISORS
13
By Northcott's Theorem, for any δ > 0, {Q ∈ Pmh(Q) < C
Thus, after possibly enlarging Z, we can continue to estimate
δ } is a finite set.
(m + 1 + ǫ)h(Φ(P )) +(cid:18)m + 1 +
. ≤ .(m + 1 + ǫ + δ)h(Φ(P )) +(cid:18)m + 1 +
1
1
M(cid:19)Xυ6∈S
M(cid:19)Xυ6∈S
λD,υ(P ) + C
λD,υ(P ).
After rearranging the inequality and choosing ǫ and δ (depending on ǫ) small,
we obtain the Theorem.
(cid:3)
In strict analogy to Corollary 2.3, we obtain the following
Corollary 2.7. Let D be an essentially large divisor on a nonsingular pro-
jective variety X, both defined over a number field k. Let S ⊂ Mk be a
finite set of places containing all archimedean ones. Then any set of (D, S)-
integral points is contained in a proper subvariety of X. In other words,
X \ D is quasi Mordellic.
Proof. We can assume without loss of generality that D is essentially very
large. Let Σ be a set of (D, S)-integral points. According to Definition 2.4,
NS(x, D) is bounded over Σ. So, by Theorem 2.6, h(Φ(P )) is bounded for
all P ∈ Σ outside a Zariski closed variety Z of X. This means that, due
to Northcott's Theorem, the set {Φ(P )P ∈ (Σ \ Z)(k)} is finite. Since
Φ is a nonconstant morphism outside of D, the preimage of this finite set
is a proper subvariety Z1 of X. We have shown that Σ ⊂ Z ∪ Z1, which
concludes the proof.
(cid:3)
3. Proofs of the sharp sufficient criteria for essentially
large divisors
As was stated in the Introduction, the filtration method from [CZ04a],
[Ru04] can be used to prove the sharp bound for the number of components
of a large divisor in the case of X = Pq (Theorem 1.7). We now give the
proof.
Proof of Theorem 1.7. The number field case being completely analogous
(see [CZ04a]), we only prove the case when K = C.
Let Q1, . . . , Qr be homogeneous polynomials of degree di such that Di =
{Qi = 0}. Let P ∈ D. After replacing each Qi by Qd/di
, where d is
the least common multiple of the di's, we can assume that all Qi have the
same degree d. Without loss of generality, assume that precisely q of the
i
14
GORDON HEIER AND MIN RU
Di contain the point P , and let {γ1, . . . , γq} be the unique set of distinct
elements of {Q1, . . . , Qr} such that P ∈ ∩q
i=1{γi = 0}.
Let VN be the vector space of homogeneous polynomials of degree N
in C[X0, . . . , Xq]. With the lexicographical ordering on the q-tuples ~i =
j=1 ij ≤ N/d, we obtain a filtration on VN by
(i1, . . . , iq) with σ(~i) := Pq
letting
W~i =X~e≥~i
1 . . . γeq
γe1
q VN−dσ(~e).
Note that clearly W~0 = VN and W~i ⊇ W~i′ for ~i′ ≥ ~i. Combining Lemma 2.3
and Lemma 3.1 of [CZ04a], we note the following Lemma for our situation.
Lemma 3.1. There exists an integer N0 (depending only on γ1, . . . , γq) such
that for all integers N > N0 and for all ~i with dσ(~i) < N − N0:
∆~i := dim W~i/W~i′ = dq.
Now choose a basis ψ1, . . . , ψm (m = (cid:0)N +q
above filtration. For all ν = 1, . . . , m, write
1 . . . γiq
ψν = γi1
q γ(ν)
q (cid:1)) for VN with respect to the
for some γ(ν) ∈ VN−dσ(~i) according to its place in the filtration.
For N ∈ N, let N = N · r · d and write
H 0(Pq, OPq ( N D)) = H 0(Pq, OPq ( N · r · d)) = H 0(Pq, OPq (N )) = VN .
For ν = 1, . . . , m, let
fν =
ψν
Q N
1 . . . Q N
r
.
These rational functions clearly form a basis for L( N D). To conclude the
ν=1 fν > 0 for any
component E in D with P ∈ E. We assume that E is contained in Dj0.
Then
proof of the Theorem, we show that they satisfy ordEQm
− N(cid:18)N + q
q (cid:19).
ordE D
ordE
m
1
fν =
X~i
∆~iij0
Since the number of nonnegative integer m-tuples with sum ≤ t is equal to
the number of nonnegative integer (m + 1)-tuples with sum exactly t which
is (cid:0)t+m
divisible by d and for every j,
m (cid:1), and since the sum below is independent of j, we have that, for N
Yν=1
ij =
X~i
1
q + 1X~i
q+1
ij =
Xj=1
1
q + 1X~i
N
d
ON ESSENTIALLY LARGE DIVISORS
15
=
1
q + 1(cid:18)N/d + q
q
(cid:19) N
d
=
N q+1
dq+1(q + 1)!
+ O(N q),
is taken over all nonnegative integer (q + 1)-tuples with sum
exactly N/d. Combining it with Lemma 3.1, we have, for every 1 ≤ j0 ≤ q,
where X~i
Thus,
1
ordE D
ordE
m
Yν=1
∆~iij0 =
N q+1
d(q + 1)!
+ O(N q).
X~i
fν =
∆~iij0
X~i
=(cid:18) N q+1
=(cid:18) 1
d · (q + 1)!
1
q + 1
− N(cid:18)N + q
q (cid:19)
+ O(N q)(cid:19) −
r(cid:19) N q+1
d · q!
−
+ O(N q).
N
dr (cid:18) N q
q!
+ O(N q−1)(cid:19)
(cid:3)
For N sufficiently large, this is positive if r ≥ q + 2.
Remark 3.2. We remark that under the assumptions of Theorem 1.7, the
paper [Ru04], using the same methods from [CZ04a], obtained a sharp Sec-
ond Main Theorem that is stronger than Theorem 2.2. The same can be said
for Theorem 1.8 and the paper [Ru09], which is in turn based on [Fer00],
[EF02]. On the other hand, Theorem 2.2 does not require these assumptions,
so it is still a new result.
We continue with the proof of Theorem 1.8, based on the methods of
[Fer00], [EF02] and [Ru09].
Proof of Theorem 1.8. The number field case being completely analogous
(see [Fer00]), we only prove the case when K = C.
Let Q1, . . . , Qr be homogeneous polynomials such that Di = {Qi = 0}∩X.
As above, we can assume that the degrees of the homogeneous polynomials
Qi equal d for all i. Let
ϕ : X → Pr−1,
x 7→ [Q1(x), . . . , Qr(x)].
Let Y := ϕ(X). By the general position assumption, ϕ is a finite holomor-
phic map X → Y .
On Pr−1, we have for all N ∈ N a short exact sequence
0 → IY (N ) → OPr−1(N ) → OY (N ) → 0.
16
GORDON HEIER AND MIN RU
The beginning of the corresponding long exact sequence reads
0 → H 0(Pr−1, IY (N )) → H 0(Pr−1, OPr−1(N ))
τ→ H 0(Y, OY (N )),
where τ denotes the restriction map. We let
WN := image(τ )
∼= H 0(Pr−1, OPr−1(N ))/ ker(τ )
∼= H 0(Pr−1, OPr−1(N ))/H 0(Pr−1, IY (N ))
∼= C[Y0, . . . , Yr−1]N /(IY )N ,
where (IY )N denotes the set of those homogeneous polynomials of degree N
vanishing on Y . Let VN := ϕ∗(WN ) ⊆ H 0(X, OX (N D)).
Since ϕ : X → Y is a finite surjective holomorphic map,
dim(VN ) = dim(WN ) = dim C[Y0, . . . , Yr−1]N /(IY )N = HY (N ),
where HY (N ) is the Hilbert function of Y .
Let P ∈ D. Without loss of generality, we assume again that there are
distinct Qi1, . . . , Qiq ∈ {Q1, . . . , Qr} such that P ∈ ∩q
j=1{Qij = 0}.
Let ~c = (c1, . . . , cr) be the r-vector whose ij-th entry (1 ≤ j ≤ q) is 1
be monomials such that their
and elsewhere is 0. Let ~y~a(1)
equivalence classes in C[Y0, . . . , Yr−1]N /(IY )N give a basis and such that
, . . . , ~y~a(HY (N))
HY (N )
SY (N, ~c) =
~a(i) • ~c,
Xi=1
where SY (N, ~c) is the N -th Hilbert weight and the bullet denotes the usual
dot product. Recall that the N -th Hilbert weight is given by
SY (N, ~c) = max
~a(i) • ~c,
HY (N )
Xi=1
, . . . , ~y~a(HY (N))
where the maximum is taken over all sets of monomials ~y~a(1)
whose residue class modulo IY form a basis of C[Y0, . . . , Yr−1]N /(IY )N . For
ν = 1, . . . , HY (N ), and N a multiple of r, let
fν =
a(ν)
1
1
Q
QN/r
1
. . . Qa(ν)
. . . QN/r
r
r
r
X .
These functions form a basis for VN understood as a subspace of L(N D).
To conclude the proof of the Theorem, we show that they satisfy
fν > 0 for any component E in D with P ∈ E. We assume
ordEQHY (N )
ν=1
that E is contained in Dj0.
≥0 . Then
·(cid:18) max
ci(cid:19) ,
i=0,...,N
ON ESSENTIALLY LARGE DIVISORS
17
We recall two basic lemmas in [Ru09]:
Lemma 3.3. Let X ⊂ PN
△. Let m > △ be an integer and let ~c = (c0, . . . , cN ) ∈ RN +1
C be an algebraic variety of dimension n and degree
1
mHX(m)
SX(m, ~c) ≥
1
(n + 1)△
eX (~c) −
(2n + 1)△
m
where
1
(n+1)△
eX (~c) is the normalized Chow weight of X with respect to ~c.
We will not give a definition of the normalized Chow weight here (see
[Ru09]). For our purposes, all we need is the following estimate from below.
Lemma 3.4. Let Y be a subvariety of Pq−1
of dimension n and degree △.
Let ~c = (c1, . . . , cq) be a tuple of positive reals. Let {i0, . . . , in} be a subset
of {1, . . . , q} such that
C
Then
Y ∩ {yi0 = 0, . . . , yin = 0} = ∅.
eY (~c) ≥ (ci0 + · · · + cin ) · △.
We now continue our proof. With our chosen ~c and ~a(i), using Lemmas
3.3 and 3.4 (notice the condition that Q1, . . . , Qr are in general position),
and the symmetry property of the ~a(1), . . . ,~a(HY (N )) ([Mum77, p. 61]),
1
ordE D
ordE
HY (N )
Yν=1
HY (N )
fν =
Xν=1
q
Xν=1
=
1
a(ν)
N
r
j0
−
~a(ν) • ~c
HY (N )
=
SY (N, ~c) −
HY (N )
N
r
HY (N )
−
N
r
HY (N )
1
q
≥
=
1
q + 1
1
q + 1
= (
1
q
1
q + 1
N HY (N )(
cij ) − O(HY (N )) −
N
r
HY (N )
q
Xj=1
N
r
N HY (N ) −
HY (N ) − O(HY (N ))
−
1
r
)N HY (N ) − O(HY (N )).
For N sufficiently large, this is positive if r ≥ q + 2.
(cid:3)
18
GORDON HEIER AND MIN RU
4. Essentially large divisors on projective varieties of small
codimension
Our ultimate (and so far unreached) goal is of course to find a (sharp)
lower bound for the number of (say ample) components in general position
necessary for a divisor on a nonsingular projective variety to be essentially
large (cf. Conjecture 1.10). For a general nonsingular projective variety, it
is clearly not true that all effective divisors are cut out by hypersurfaces
in the ambient projective space, as assumed in Theorem 1.8. In this final
Section, we exhibit a class of nonsingular projective varieties for which this
is the case and to which Theorem 1.8 can thus be applied. Consequently,
the above-mentioned ultimate goal has been achieved for these varieties.
We refer the reader to [Har74] or [Laz04, Section 3.2] for more on the
algebraic geometry behind this question, which is essentially the problem
of extending the Lefschetz Hyperplane Theorem to varieties that are not
complete intersections. In particular, the theorems of Barth [Bar70], Larsen
[Lar73], and, in the case of a general ground field of characteristic zero, Ogus
[Ogu73] apply. For our purposes, we simply state the following Proposition,
which is an immediate consequence of these theorems.
Proposition 4.1. Let X ⊂ Pℓ be a nonsingular projective variety of dimen-
sion q, defined over K. If 2q − ℓ ≥ 2, then restriction yields an isomorphism
Pic(Pℓ) ∼=→ Pic(X).
Since Pic(Pℓ) = Z, this Proposition gives the following Corollary to The-
orem 1.8.
Corollary 4.2. Let q ≥ 1 and r ≥ q + 2 be integers. Let X ⊆ Pℓ be a
nonsingular projective variety of dimension q, defined over K. Assume that
i=1 Di be an effective divisor on X defined over
K such that the Di are in general position. Then D is essentially large.
2q − ℓ ≥ 2 holds. Let D =Pr
We conclude by pointing out that the condition 2q − ℓ ≥ 2 is not that
restrictive. It is well-known that, by general linear projections, any nonsin-
gular projective variety of dimension q can be embedded in Pℓ with ℓ = 2q+1.
Thus, for a generic nonsingular projective variety, one can always find an
embedding with 2q − ℓ = −1, which is quite close to the above condition. In
particular, Corollary 4.2 applies to many interesting special projective vari-
eties such as hypersurfaces, appropriate complete intersections, and certain
Grassmannians, such as G(2, 5) embedded into P9 under the Plucker em-
bedding. Note that the latter is not a complete intersection due to B´ezout's
Theorem, because its degree is (the prime number) 5, while it is not con-
tained in any hyperplane.
ON ESSENTIALLY LARGE DIVISORS
19
References
[Bar70] W. Barth. Transplanting cohomology classes in complex-projective space. Amer.
[CZ02]
[CZ03]
J. Math., 92:951 -- 967, 1970.
P. Corvaja and U. Zannier. A subspace theorem approach to integral points on
curves. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris, 334(4):267 -- 271, 2002.
P. Corvaja and U. Zannier. On the number of integral points on algebraic curves.
J. Reine Angew. Math., 565:27 -- 42, 2003.
[CZ04a] P. Corvaja and U. Zannier. On a general Thue's equation. Amer. J. Math.,
126(5):1033 -- 1055, 2004.
[CZ04b] P. Corvaja and U. Zannier. On integral points on surfaces. Ann. of Math. (2),
160(2):705 -- 726, 2004.
[CZ06a] P. Corvaja and U. Zannier. Addendum to: "On a general Thue's equation"
[Amer. J. Math. 126 (2004), no. 5, 1033 -- 1055; mr2089081]. Amer. J. Math.,
128(4):1057 -- 1066, 2006.
[CZ06b] P. Corvaja and U. Zannier. On the integral points on certain surfaces. Int. Math.
[EF02]
[EF08]
Res. Not., pages Art. ID 98623, 20, 2006.
J.-H. Evertse and R. Ferretti. Diophantine inequalities on projective varieties.
Int. Math. Res. Not., (25):1295 -- 1330, 2002.
J.-H. Evertse and R. Ferretti. A generalization of the Subspace Theorem with
polynomials of higher degree. In Diophantine approximation, volume 16 of Dev.
Math., pages 175 -- 198. SpringerWienNewYork, Vienna, 2008.
[Fer00] R. Ferretti. Mumford's degree of contact and Diophantine approximations. Com-
positio Math., 121(3):247 -- 262, 2000.
[Gre75] M. Green. Some Picard theorems for holomorphic maps to algebraic varieties.
Amer. J. Math., 97:43 -- 75, 1975.
[Har74] R. Hartshorne. Varieties of small codimension in projective space. Bull. Amer.
[Lan83]
[Lan87]
Math. Soc., 80:1017 -- 1032, 1974.
S. Lang. Fundamentals of Diophantine geometry. Springer-Verlag, New York,
1983.
S. Lang. Introduction to complex hyperbolic spaces. Springer-Verlag, New York,
1987.
[Lar73] M. Larsen. On the topology of complex projective manifolds. Invent. Math.,
19:251 -- 260, 1973.
[Laz04] R. Lazarsfeld. Positivity in algebraic geometry. I, volume 48 of Ergebnisse der
Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in
Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Series
of Modern Surveys in Mathematics]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004. Classical
setting: line bundles and linear series.
[Lev09] A. Levin. Generalizations of Siegel's and Picard's theorems. Ann. of Math. (2),
170(2):609 -- 655, 2009.
[Mum77] D. Mumford. Stability of projective varieties. L'Enseignement Math´ematique,
Geneva, 1977. Lectures given at the "Institut des Hautes ´Etudes Scien-
tifiques", Bures-sur-Yvette, March-April 1976, Monographie de l'Enseignement
Math´ematique, No. 24.
[Ogu73] A. Ogus. Local cohomological dimension of algebraic varieties. Ann. of Math.
(2), 98:327 -- 365, 1973.
[Ru97] M. Ru. On a general form of the second main theorem. Trans. Amer. Math.
Soc., 349(12):5093 -- 5105, 1997.
[Ru04] M. Ru. A defect relation for holomorphic curves intersecting hypersurfaces.
Amer. J. Math., 126(1):215 -- 226, 2004.
20
GORDON HEIER AND MIN RU
[Ru09] M. Ru. Holomorphic curves into algebraic varieties. Ann. of Math. (2),
169(1):255 -- 267, 2009.
[Voj89] P. Vojta. A refinement of Schmidt's subspace theorem. Amer. J. Math.,
111(3):489 -- 518, 1989.
[Voj97] P. Vojta. On Cartan's theorem and Cartan's conjecture. Amer. J. Math.,
119(1):1 -- 17, 1997.
Department of Mathematics, University of Houston, 4800 Calhoun Road,
Houston, TX 77204, USA
E-mail address: [email protected]
E-mail address: [email protected]
|
1502.07378 | 3 | 1502 | 2017-01-26T12:03:55 | Moduli of nodal curves on K3 surfaces | [
"math.AG"
] | We consider modular properties of nodal curves on general $K3$ surfaces. Let $\mathcal{K}_p$ be the moduli space of primitively polarized $K3$ surfaces $(S,L)$ of genus $p\geqslant 3$ and $\mathcal{V}_{p,m,\delta}\to \mathcal{K}_p$ be the universal Severi variety of $\delta$--nodal irreducible curves in $|mL|$ on $(S,L)\in \mathcal{K}_p$. We find conditions on $p, m,\delta$ for the existence of an irreducible component $\mathcal{V}$ of $\mathcal{V}_{p,m,\delta}$ on which the moduli map $\psi: \mathcal{V}\to \mathcal{M}_g$ (with $g= m^2 (p -1) + 1-\delta$) has generically maximal rank differential. Our results, which for any $p$ leave only finitely many cases unsolved and are optimal for $m\geqslant 5$ (except for very low values of $p$), are summarized in Theorem 1.1 in the introduction. | math.AG | math |
MODULI OF NODAL CURVES ON K3 SURFACES
C. CILIBERTO, F. FLAMINI, C. GALATI, AND A. L. KNUTSEN
Abstract. We consider modular properties of nodal curves on general K3 surfaces. Let Kp be the
moduli space of primitively polarized K3 surfaces (S, L) of genus p > 3 and Vp,m,δ → Kp be the
universal Severi variety of δ -- nodal irreducible curves in mL on (S, L) ∈ Kp. We find conditions on
p, m, δ for the existence of an irreducible component V of Vp,m,δ on which the moduli map ψ : V → Mg
(with g = m2(p − 1) + 1 − δ) has generically maximal rank differential. Our results, which for any p
leave only finitely many cases unsolved and are optimal for m > 5 (except for very low values of p),
are summarized in Theorem 1.1 in the introduction.
1. Introduction
Let (S, L) be a smooth, primitively polarized complex K3 surface of genus p > 2, with L a globally
generated, indivisible line bundle with L2 = 2p − 2. We denote by Kp the moduli space (or stack)
of smooth primitively polarized K3 surfaces of genus p, which is smooth, irreducible, of dimension
19. Its elements correspond to the isomorphism classes [S, L] of pairs (S, L) as above. We will often
abuse notation and denote [S, L] simply by S.
For m > 1, the arithmetic genus of the curves in mL is p(m) = m2(p − 1) + 1. Let δ be an integer
such that 0 6 δ 6 p(m). We consider the quasi -- projective scheme (or stack) Vp,m,δ (or simply Vm,δ,
when p is understood), called the (m, δ) -- universal Severi variety, parametrizing all pairs (S, C), with
(S, L) ∈ Kp and C ∈ mL a reduced and irreducible curve, with only δ nodes as singularities.
One has the projection
φm,δ : Vm,δ → Kp
whose fiber over (S, L) ∈ Kp is the variety, denoted by Vm,δ(S), called the Severi variety of δ-nodal
irreducible curves in mL. The variety Vm,δ(S) is well-known to be smooth, pure of dimension
gm,δ := p(m) − δ = m2(p − 1) + 1 − δ. We will often write g for gm,δ if no confusion arises: this is
the geometric genus of any curve in Vm,δ.
One has the obvious moduli map
ψm,δ : Vm,δ
/ Mg,
where Mg is moduli space of smooth genus -- g curves, sending a curve C to the class of its normaliza-
tion. Our objective in this paper is to find conditions on p, m and δ (or equivalently g) ensuring the
existence of a component V of Vm,δ, such that ψm,δV is either (a) generically finite onto its image,
or (b) dominant onto Mg. Note that (a) can happen only for g > 11 and (b) only for g 6 11.
We collect our results in the following statement, which, for any p, solves the problem for all but
finitely many (g, m); for instance, for m > 5 and p > 7 the result yields that the moduli map has
maximal rank on some component for any g.
Theorem 1.1. With the above notation, one has:
(A) For the following values of p > 3, m and g there is an irreducible component V of Vm,δ, such
that the moduli map V → Mg is dominant:
• m = 1 and 0 6 g 6 7;
• m = 2, p > g − 1 and 0 6 g 6 8;
• m = 3, p > g − 2 and 0 6 g 6 9;
• m = 4, p > g − 3 and 0 6 g 6 10;
1
/
2
C. CILIBERTO, F. FLAMINI, C. GALATI, AND A. L. KNUTSEN
• m > 5, p > g − 4 and 0 6 g 6 11.
(B) For the following values of p, m and g there is an irreducible component V of Vm,δ, such that
the moduli map V → Mg is generically finite onto its image:
• m = 1 and p > g > 15;
• 2 6 m 6 4, p > 15 and g > 16;
• m > 5, p > 7 and g > 11.
To prove this, it suffices to exhibit some specific curve in the universal Severi variety such that a
component of the fiber of the moduli map at that curve has the right dimension, i.e, min{0, 22 − 2g}.
To do this, we argue by degeneration, i.e., we consider partial compactifications Kp and V m,δ of both
Kp and Vm,δ and prove the above assertion for curves in the boundary.
The partial compactification Kp is obtained by adding to Kp a divisor Sp parametrizing pairs
(S, T ), where S is a reducible K3 surface of genus p that can be realised in Pp as the union of two
rational normal scrolls intersecting along an elliptic normal curve E, and T is the zero scheme of a
section of the first cotangent sheaf T 1
S, consisting of 16 points on E. These 16 points, plus a subtle
deformation argument of nodal curves, play a fundamental role in our approach for m = 1. For
m > 1 we specialize curves in the Severi variety to suitable unions of curves used for m = 1 plus
other types of limit curves, namely tacnodal limit curves passing through two of the 16 special points.
The paper is organized as follows. The short §2 is devoted to preliminary results, and we in
particular define a slightly broader notion of Severi variety including the cases of curves with more
than δ nodes and of reducible curves. In §3 we introduce the partial compactification Kp we use
(cf. [Fr2, Ku, PP]). In §4 we start the analysis of the case m = 1, and we introduce the curves in
V 1,δ over the reducible surfaces in Sp that we use for proving our results. Section 5 is devoted to
the study of the fiber of the moduli map for the curves introduced in the previous §4: this is the
technical core of this paper. In §6 we prove the m = 1 part of Theorem 1.1. In §7 we introduce the
tacnodal limit curves mentioned above, which are needed to work out the cases m > 1 of Theorem
1.1 in §§8 -- 9.
The study of Severi varieties is classical and closely related to modular properties. For the case of
nodal plane curves the traditional reference is Severi's wide exposition in [Se, Anhang F], although
already in Enriques -- Chisini's famous book [EC, vol. III, chapt.
III, §33] families of plane nodal
curves with general moduli have been considered. The most important result on this subject is
Harris' proof in [Ha] of the so -- called Severi conjecture, which asserts that the Severi variety of
irreducible plane curves of degree d with δ nodes is irreducible.
In recent times there has been a growing interest in Severi varieties for K3 surfaces and their
modular properties. In their seminal works [MM, Mu1, Mu2] Mori and Mukai proved that in the
case of smooth curves in the hyperplane section class, i.e., what we denoted here by Vp,1,0, the
modular map: (a) dominates Mp, for p 6 9 and p = 11, whereas this is false for p = 10, and (b) is
generically finite between Vp,1,0 and its image in Mp for p = 11 and p > 13, whereas this is false
for p = 12. In [CLM1] one gives a different proof of these results, proving, in addition, that Vp,1,0
birationally maps to its image in Mp for p = 11 and p > 13. The case of Vp,m,0, with m > 1, has
been studied in [CLM2].
As for δ > 0, in [FKPS] one proves that Vp,1,δ dominates Mg for 2 6 g < p 6 11. Quite recently,
Kemeny, inspired by ideas of Mukai's, and using geometric constructions of appropriate curves on
K3 surfaces with high rank Picard group, proved in [Ke] that there is an irreducible component of
Vp,m,δ for which the moduli map is generically finite onto its image for all but finitely many values
of p, m and δ. Kemeny's results partly intersect with part (B) of our Theorem 1.1; his results are
slightly stronger than ours for m 6 4, however our results are stronger and in fact optimal for m > 5
(if p > 7). Moreover part (A), which is also optimal for m > 5 (except for some very low values of
p), is completely new. Note that a different proof of the case m = 1 in Theorem 1.1 has recently
been given in [CFGK].
MODULI OF NODAL CURVES ON K3 SURFACES
3
To finish, it is the case to mention that probably the most interesting open problems on the subject
are the following:
Questions 1.2. For S ∈ Kp general, is the Severi variety Vp,m,δ(S) irreducible? Is the universal
Severi variety Vp,m,δ irreducible?
So far it is only known that Vp,1,δ is irreducible for 3 6 g 6 12 and g 6= 11 (see [CD]).
Terminology and conventions. We work over C. For X a Gorenstein variety, we denote by
OX and ωX the structure sheaf and the canonical line bundle, respectively, and KX will denote
a canonical divisor of X. If x ∈ X, then TX,x denotes the Zariski tangent space to X at x. For
Y ⊂ X a subscheme, JY /X (or simply JY if there is no danger of confusion) will denote its ideal
sheaf whereas NY /X its normal sheaf. For line bundles we will sometimes abuse notation and use
the additive notation to denote tensor products. Finally, we will denote by L∗ the inverse of a line
bundle L and by ≡ the linear equivalence of Cartier divisors.
Acknowledgements. The first three authors have been supported by the GNSAGA of Indam and
by the PRIN project "Geometry of projective varieties", funded by the Italian MIUR.
The authors wish to thank M. Kemeny for interesting and useful conversations on the subject of
this paper. We also thank the referee for a very careful reading and for making several observations
and suggestions that improved the readability of the paper, as well as discovering some inaccuracies
in the first version.
2. Preliminaries
To prove our main results, we will need to consider nodal, reducible curves. To this end we will
work with a slightly broader notion of Severi variety than the one from the introduction.
Let D be a base point free complete linear system on a smooth K3 surface S. Consider the
quasi-projective scheme VD,δ(S) parametrizing pairs (C, νC ) such that
(1) C is a reduced (possibly reducible) nodal curve in D;
(2) νC is a subset of δ of its nodes, henceforth called the marked nodes (called assigned nodes in
[Ta]), such that the normalization eC → C at νC is 2-connected.
Then, by [Ta, Thms. 3.8 and 3.11], one has:
(i) VD,δ(S) is smooth of codimension δ in D;
(ii) in any component of VD,δ(S), the general pair (C, νC ) is such that C is irreducible with precisely
δ nodes.
We leave it to the reader to verify that the conditions in [Ta] are in fact equivalent to ours. We call
VD,δ(S) the Severi variety of nodal curves in D with δ marked nodes. This definition is different
from others one finds in the literature (and even from the one in the introduction!). Usually, in the
Severi variety one considers only irreducible curves C with exactly δ nodes. With our definition we
consider the desingularization of a partial compactification of the latter variety. This will be useful
for our purposes.
We define the (m, δ)-universal Severi variety Vp,m,δ (or simply Vm,δ when p is understood) to be
the quasi-projective variety (or stack) parametrizing triples (S, C, νC ), with S = (S, L) ∈ Kp and
(C, νC ) ∈ VmL,δ(S). It is smooth and pure of dimension 19 + p(m) − δ = 19 + gm,δ and the general
element in any component is a triple (S, C, νC ) with C irreducible with exactly δ nodes. We may
simplify notation and identify (S, C, νC ) ∈ Vp,m,δ with the curve C, when the surface S and the set
of nodes νC are intended.
One has the projection
φm,δ : Vm,δ
/ Kp
whose fiber over S ∈ Kp is the Severi variety Vm,δ(S) := VmL,δ(S). Similarly, we have a moduli map
ψm,δ : Vm,δ
/ Mg
/
/
4
C. CILIBERTO, F. FLAMINI, C. GALATI, AND A. L. KNUTSEN
(where Mg is the moduli space of genus g stable curves and we recall that g = gm,δ := p(m) − δ),
which sends a curve C to the stable model of the partial normalization of C at the δ marked nodes.
For S ∈ Kp and integers 0 6 δ 6 δ′ 6 p(m), one has a correspondence
Xm,δ,δ′(S) := {(C, C ′) ∈ Vm,δ(S) × Vm,δ′ (S) C = C ′ and νC ⊆ νC′}
with the two projections
Vm,δ(S)
p1
Xm,δ,δ′(S)
p2
Vm,δ′ (S),
which are both finite onto their images. Precisely:
• p2 is surjective, ètale of degree(cid:0)δ′
δ(cid:1), hence dim(Xm,δ,δ′(S)) = gm,δ′ ;
• p1 is birational onto its image, denoted by V[m,δ,δ′](S), which is pure with
dim(V[m,δ,δ′](S)) = gm,δ′ = dim(Vm,δ(S)) − (δ′ − δ).
Roughly speaking, the variety V[m,δ,δ′](S) is the proper subvariety of Vm,δ(S) consisting of curves with
at least δ′ nodes, δ of them marked. The general point of any component of V[m,δ,δ′](S) corresponds
to a curve with exactly δ′ nodes. So one has the filtration
V[m,δ,p(m)](S) ⊂ V[m,δ,p(m)−1](S) ⊂ . . . ⊂ V[m,δ,δ+1](S) ⊂ V[m,δ,δ](S) = Vm,δ(S)
in which each variety has codimension 1 in the subsequent.
Remark 2.1. Given a component V of Vm,δ(S) and δ′ > δ, there is no a priori guarantee that
V ∩ V[m,δ,δ′](S) 6= ∅. If this is the case, then each component of V ∩ V[m,δ,δ′](S) has codimension
δ′ − δ in V and we say that V is δ′ -- complete. If V is δ′ -- complete, then it is also δ′′ -- complete for
δ < δ′′ < δ′. If V is p(m) -- complete we say it is fully complete, i.e., V is fully complete if and only if
it contains a point parametrizing a rational nodal curve.
If V is a component of Vm,δ(S) and W a component of Vm,δ′(S), such that dim(Xm,δ,δ′ ∩(V ×W )) =
gm,δ′ , then Xm,δ,δ′ ∩ (V × W ) dominates a component V ′ of V[m,δ,δ′] contained in V , whose general
point is a curve in W with δ marked nodes. In this case we will abuse language and say that W is
included in V .
Of course one can make a relative version of the previous definitions, and make sense of the
subscheme V[m,δ,δ′] ⊂ Vm,δ, which has dimension 19 + gm,δ′, of the filtration
V[m,δ,p(m)] ⊂ V[m,δ,p(m)−1] ⊂ . . . ⊂ V[m,δ,δ+1] ⊂ Vm,δ,
of the definition of a δ′ -- complete component V of Vm,δ, for δ′ > δ, of fully complete components, etc.
For δ′ > δ, the image of V[m,δ,δ′] via ψm,δ sits in the (δ′ − δ) -- codimensional locus ∆gm,δ,δ′−δ of
(δ′ − δ) -- nodal curves in Mgm,δ .
3. Stable limits of K3 surfaces
In this section we consider some reducible surfaces (see [CLM1]), which are limits of smooth,
polarized K3 surfaces, in the sense of the following:
Definition 3.1. Let R be a compact, connected analytic variety. A variety Y is said to be a defor-
mation of R if there exists a proper, flat morphism
π : Y → D = {t ∈ C t < 1}
such that R = Y0 := π∗(0). Accordingly, R is said to be a flat limit of Yt := π∗(t), for t 6= 0.
If Y is smooth and if any of the π-fibers has at most normal crossing singularities, Y π−→ D is
said to be a semi-stable deformation of R (and R is a semi-stable limit of Yt, t 6= 0). If, in addition,
Yt is a smooth K3 surface, for t 6= 0, then R is a semi-stable limit of K3 surfaces.
If, in the above setting, one has a line bundle L on Y, with Lt = LYt for t 6= 0 and L = LR, then
one says that (R, L) is a limit of (Yt, Lt) for t 6= 0.
/
/
o
o
MODULI OF NODAL CURVES ON K3 SURFACES
5
Let p = 2l + ε > 3 be an integer with ε = 0, 1 and l ∈ N. If E′ ⊂ Pp is an elliptic normal curve
of degree p + 1, we set LE′ := OE′(1). Consider two general line bundles L1, L2 ∈ Pic2(E′) with
L1 6= L2. We denote by R′
i the rational normal scroll of degree p − 1 in Pp described by the secant
lines to E′ spanned by the divisors in Li, for 1 6 i 6 2. We have
i ≃(P1 × P1
F1
R′
if p = 2l + 1 is odd and OE′(1) 6∼ (l + 1)Li, for i = 1, 2
if p = 2l is even.
The surfaces R′
1 and R′
2 are P1 -- bundles on P1. We denote by σi and Fi a minimal section and a
fiber of the ruling of R′
i, respectively, so that σ2
(1) ≃ OR′
:= OR′
i = ε − 1 and F 2
(σi + lFi),
i = 0, and
for 1 6 i 6 2.
i
By [CLM1, Thm. 1], R′
2 intersect transversely along E′, which is anticanonical on R′
i, i.e.
(1)
(2)
i
i
LR′
1 and R′
E′ ≡ −KR′
i
≡ 2σi + (3 − ǫ)Fi
for 1 6 i 6 2.
Hence R′ = R′
cotangent sheaf T 1
1 ∪ R′
2 has normal crossings and ωR′ is trivial. We set LR′
R′ (cf. [Fr1, § 1]) is the degree 16 line bundle on E′
:= OR′(1). The first
(3)
T 1
R′ ≃ NE′/R′
1
⊗ NE′/R′
2
≃ L⊗4
E′ ⊗ (L1 ⊗ L2)⊗(3−2l−ǫ),
the last isomorphism coming from (1) and (2).
The surface R′ is a flat limit of smooth K3 surfaces in Pp. Namely, if Hp is the component of the
Hilbert scheme of surfaces in Pp containing K3 surfaces S such that [S, OS (1)] ∈ Kp, then R′ sits
in Hp and, for general choices of E′, L1, L2, the Hilbert scheme Hp is smooth at R′ (see [CLM1]).
R′ is non-trivial implies that R′ is not a semi -- stable limit of K3 surfaces:
However, the fact that T 1
indeed, the total space of every flat deformation of R′ to K3 surfaces in Hp is singular along a divisor
T ∈ T 1
R′ (cf. [Fr1, Prop. 1.11 and § 2]). More precisely (see again [CLM1] for details), if
(4)
R′
/ R′
D × Pp
π′
pr2
#●●●●●●●●●
0
/ D
Pp
is a deformation of R′ in Pp whose general member is a smooth K3 surface, then R′ has double
R′ associated to tangent direction to Hp at R′ determined by
points at the points of a divisor T ∈ T 1
the deformation (4), via the standard map
(5)
THp,R′ ≃ H 0(R′, NR′/Pp) → H 0(T 1
R′ ).
If T is reduced (this is the case if (4) is general enough), then the tangent cone to R′ at each of the 16
points of T has rank 4. In this case, by blowing up R′ at the points of T , the exceptional divisors are
rank 4 quadric surfaces and, by contracting each of them along a ruling on one of the two irreducible
components of the strict transform of R′, one obtains a small resolution of singularities Π : R → R′
and a semi-stable degeneration π : R−→D of K3 surfaces, with central fiber R := R1 ∪ R2, where
Ri = Π−1(R′
i), for i = 1, 2 and still ωR ≃ OR. Note that we have a line bundle on R, defined
as L := Π∗(pr∗
2(OPp(1))). So π : R−→D is a deformation of polarized K3 surfaces, and we set
LR := LR = Π∗
R(LR′ ).
We will abuse notation and terminology by identifying curves on R′ with their proper transforms
on R (so we may talk of lines on R, etc.).
We will set E = R1 ∩ R2; then E ≃ E′ (and we will often identify them). We have T 1
R ≃ OE. If
the divisor T corresponding to the deformation (4) is not reduced, the situation can be handled in
a similar way, but we will not dwell on it, because we will not need it.
The above limits R of K3 surfaces are stable, Type II degenerations according to the Kulikov-
Persson-Pinkham classification of semi-stable degenerations of K3 surfaces (see [Ku, PP]).
/
/
/
#
/
6
C. CILIBERTO, F. FLAMINI, C. GALATI, AND A. L. KNUTSEN
By [Fr2, Thm. 4.10] there is a normal, separated partial compactification Kp of Kp obtained by
adding to Kp a smooth divisor consisting of various components corresponding to the various kinds
of Type II degenerations of K3 surfaces. One of these components, which we henceforward call
Sp, corresponds to the degenerations we mentioned above. Specifically, points of Sp parametrize
isomorphism classes of pairs (R′, T ) with R′ = R′
[Fr2, Def.
4.9]. Since all our considerations will be local around general members of Sp, where the associated
T is reduced, we may and will henceforth assume (after substituting Kp and Sp with dense open
subvarieties) that Kp is smooth,
2 as above and T ∈ T 1
R′ , cf.
1 ∪ R′
Kp = Kp ∪ Sp
and that T is reduced for all (R′, T ) ∈ Sp. Thus, again since all our considerations will be local
around such pairs, we may identify (R′, T ) with the surface R = R1 ∪ R2, as above, with R1 ≃ R′
1
2 at the 16 points of T on E′. If T = p1 + . . . + p16, we denote by ei the
and R2 the blow -- up of R′
exceptional divisor on R2 over pi, for 1 6 i 6 16, and we set e := e1 + · · · + e16.
To be explicit, let us denote by R′
p ⊂ Hp the locally closed subscheme whose points correspond
2 with L1, L2 general as above and such that (R′, T ) ∈ Sp for some
to unions of scrolls R′ = R′
T ∈ T 1
p → M1 whose fiber over the class of the elliptic
curve E′, modulo projectivities PGL(p + 1, C), is an open subset of Sym2(Pic2(E′)) × Picp+1(E′)
modulo the action of Aut(E′). Hence
R′ . One has an obvious dominant morphism R′
1 ∪ R′
dim(R′
p) = p2 + 2p + 3, whereas dim(Hp) = p2 + 2p + 19,
so that for R′ ∈ R′
(5) factors through a map
p general, the normal space NR′/R′
p = THp,R′/TR′
p,R′ has dimension 16. The map
NR′/R′
p → H 0(T 1
R′)
which is an isomorphism (see [CLM1]).
We denote by Rp the PGL(p + 1, C) -- quotient of R′
p, which, by the above argument, has dimension
dim(Rp) = 3. By definition, there is a surjective morphism
πp : Sp → Rp
whose fiber over (the class of) R′ is a dense, open subset of T 1
R′, which has dimension 15 (by (3),
given L1, L2 and LE′, then OE′(T ) is determined). This, by the way, confirms that dim(Sp) = 18.
The universal Severi variety Vm,δ has a partial compactification V m,δ (see [CK1, Lemma 1.4]),
with a morphism
φm,δ : V m,δ → Kp
extending φm,δ, where the fiber V m,δ(R) over a general R = R1 ∪ R2 ∈ Sp consists of all nodal
curves C ∈ mLR, with δ marked, non -- disconnecting nodes in the smooth locus of R, i.e., the partial
normalization of C at the δ nodes is connected. (There exist more refined partial compactifications
of Vm,δ, for instance by adding curves with tacnodes along E, as considered in [Ch, GK], following
[Ra]; we will consider such curves in §7, but we do not need them now). The total transform C of
a nodal curve C ′ ∈ mLR′ with h marked nodes in the smooth locus of R′ and k marked nodes at
points of T , with h + k = δ, lies in V m,δ(R), since it contains the exceptional divisors on R2 over
the k points of T , and has a marked node on each of them off E. As for the smooth case, V m,δ(R),
is smooth, of dimension g = p(m) − δ. We can also consider δ′ − δ codimensional subvarieties of
V m,δ(R) of the form V [m,δ,δ′](R), with δ < δ′, etc.
Finally, there is an extended moduli map
We end this section with a definition, related to the construction of the surfaces R′, that we will
need later.
ψm,δ : V m,δ −→ Mg.
MODULI OF NODAL CURVES ON K3 SURFACES
7
Definition 3.2. Let E be a smooth elliptic curve with two degree-two line bundles L1 and L2 on it.
For any integer k > 0, we define the automorphism φk,E on E that sends x ∈ E to the unique
point y ∈ E satisfying
(6)
(7)
OE(x + y) ≃ L
OE(x − y) ≃ (L2 ⊗ L∗
2
⊗ k+1
2
2 , k odd;
⊗ (L∗
1)⊗ k
1)⊗ k−1
2 , k even.
For any x ∈ E, we define the effective divisor Dk,E(x) to be the degree k + 1 divisor
(8)
Dk,E(x) = x + φ1,E(x) + · · · + φk,E(x).
4. Limits of nodal hyperplane sections on reducible K3 surfaces
Given R ∈ Sp , with R = R1 ∪ R2 as explained in the previous section, we will now describe
certain curves in V 1,δ lying on R.
Definition 4.1. Let d, ℓ be non -- negative integers such that ℓ 6 16. Set δ = d + ℓ and assume
δ 6 p − ǫ, where
ǫ =(1
0
if ℓ = 0,
if ℓ > 0.
We define Wd,ℓ(R) to be the set of reduced curves in V 1,δ(R):
(a) having exactly d1 := ⌊ d
off di lines on Ri, for i = 1, 2;
(b) such that the union of these d = d1 + d2 lines is connected;
(c) containing exactly ℓ irreducible components of e, so they have ℓ further nodes, none of them lying
on E.
2 ⌉ nodes on R2 − E − e, hence they split
2 ⌋ nodes on R1 − E and d2 := ⌈ d
These curves have exactly δ nodes on the smooth locus of R, which are the marked nodes. We
write Wδ(R) for Wδ,0(R).
For any curve C in Wd,ℓ(R), we denote by C the connected union of d lines as in (b), called the line
chain of C, and by γi the irreducible component of the residual curve to C and to the ℓ components
of the exceptional curve e on Ri, for i = 1, 2.
Curves in Wd,ℓ(R) are total transforms of curves on R′ = πp(R) with d marked nodes on R′ \ E′
and passing through ℓ marked points in T . Members of Wδ(R) are shown in the following pictures,
which also show their images via the moduli map ψ1,δ (provided g > 3 if δ is odd and g > 2 if δ is
even, otherwise the image in moduli is different). The curves γi ⊂ Ri, i = 1, 2, are mapped each to
one of the two rational components of the image curve in Mg. The situation is similar for curves in
Wd,ℓ(R), with ℓ > 0.
(δ−1)/2
nodes
P
δ/2
nodes
P
(δ+1)/2
nodes
δ/2
nodes
Q
E
}g pts
}g pts
Q
E
}
g pts
}g pts
Figure 1. Members of Wδ(R) when δ is odd (left) and even (right).
8
C. CILIBERTO, F. FLAMINI, C. GALATI, AND A. L. KNUTSEN
The condition δ 6 p − ǫ guarantees that the normalization of a curve in Wd,ℓ(R) at the δ marked
nodes is connected.
The points P and Q in the picture are called the distinguished points of the curve in Wd,ℓ(R).
They satisfy the relation φd,E(P ) = Q (equivalently, φd,E(Q) = P if d is odd). Note that P, Q ∈ γ1
if δ is odd, whereas P ∈ γ1 and Q ∈ γ2 if δ is even.
We will consider the pair of distinguished points as an element P + Q ∈ Sym2(E) when d is odd,
whereas we will consider the pair as an ordered element (P, Q) ∈ E × E when d is even, since we
then can distinguish P and Q, as P ∈ γ1 and Q ∈ γ2.
Recalling (8), we note that Dd,E(P ) (equivalently, Dd,E(Q) if d is odd) is the (reduced) divisor of
intersection points of the line chain of the curve in Wδ(R) with E.
Proposition 4.2. Assume 0 6 δ 6 p−1. Then Wδ(R) is a smooth, dense open subset of a component
of dimension g = p − δ of V 1,δ(R).
Proof. If δ is even we denote by G δ
Then we have surjective morphisms
2
⊂ E × E the graph of the translation by δ
2 (L1 − L2) ∈ Pic0(E).
gp,δ : Wδ(R) −→(P + Q ∈ δ+1
(P, Q) ∈ G δ
2
2 L2 − δ−1
2 L1
if δ is odd,
if δ is even.
Take any point η = P +Q or η = (P, Q) in the target of gp,δ. Set Dη := Dδ,E(P ), which is an effective
divisor of degree δ + 1 on E. Then Dη defines a unique line chain Cη on R and the fiber g−1
p,δ (η) is a
dense, open subset of the projective space L ⊗ JCη/R ≃ L′ ⊗ JCη/R′ ≃ LE′ ⊗ OE′(−Dη). Since
f := dim(LE′ ⊗ OE′(−Dη)) = p − δ − 1 > 0,
then Wδ(R) is irreducible of dimension f + 1 = p − δ = g. The smoothness of V 1,δ(R) at the
[CK1,
points of Wδ(R) follows, as usual, because the δ marked nodes are non -- disconnecting (cf.
Rmk. 1.1]).
(cid:3)
The same argument proves the following:
Proposition 4.3. Let d, ℓ be non -- negative integers such that 0 < ℓ 6 16. Set δ = d + ℓ and assume
δ 6 p. Then Wd,ℓ(R) is a union of smooth, open dense subsets of components of dimension g = p − δ
of V 1,δ(R).
The number of components of Wd,ℓ(R) is(cid:0)16
l(cid:1), depending on the choice of subdivisors of degree l
We can finally consider the universal family Wd,ℓ, irreducible by monodromy, parametrizing all
pairs (R, C) with R ∈ Sp and C ∈ Wd,ℓ(R) with the map Wd,ℓ → Sp, whose general fiber is smooth
of dimension g, so that dim(Wd,ℓ) = g + 18. Note that V 1,δ is smooth along Wd,ℓ.
of T .
We will only be concerned with the cases ℓ = 0, 1, 2, and mostly with ℓ = 0.
Definition 4.4. For δ 6 p, we denote by V ∗
Wδ if δ < p and Wp−1,1 if δ = p. We denote by V ∗
δ : V ∗
ψ∗
Remark 4.5. It is useful to notice that, for R ∈ Sp one has
δ → Mg and φ∗
δ : V ∗
δ → Kp the restrictions of ψ1,δ and φ1,δ, respectively.
δ the unique irreducible component of V 1,δ containing
δ over S ∈ Kp. We denote by
δ (S) the fiber of V ∗
and
Hence we also have
Wδ+1(R) ⊂ Wδ(R),
for 0 6 δ 6 p − 1,
Wδ,1(R) ⊂ Wδ,0(R) = Wδ(R),
for 0 6 δ 6 p − 1.
δ+1 ⊂ V ∗
V ∗
δ ,
for 0 6 δ 6 p − 1,
δ is fully complete (see Remark 2.1). It follows by monodromy that for general S ∈ Kp, every
i.e., V ∗
component of V ∗
δ (S) is fully complete.
MODULI OF NODAL CURVES ON K3 SURFACES
9
5. Special fibers of the moduli map
This section is devoted to the study of the dimension of the fibers of the moduli map ψ∗
δ over
curves arising from reducible K3 surfaces.
For any R′ ∈ Rp, we define varieties of nodal curves analogously to Definition 4.1: we denote by
Wδ(R′) the set of reduced curves in LR′ = OR′ (1) having exactly ⌊ δ
1 − E′ and ⌈ δ
2 ⌉
2 − E′, so that they split off a total of δ lines, and such that the union of these δ lines
nodes on R′
is connected. Clearly, if R′ = πp(R) for some R = (R′, T ) ∈ Sp, then there is a dominant, injective
map
2 ⌋ nodes on R′
Wδ(R)
/ Wδ(R′)
mapping a curve in Wδ(R) to its isomorphic image on R′. The image of this map is precisely the set
of curves in Wδ(R′) not passing through any of the points in T .
The concepts of line chain, distinguished pair of points and curves γi associated to an element of
Wδ(R′) are defined in the same way as for the curves in Wδ(R).
As above, we can consider the irreducible variety W ′
and C ′ ∈ Wδ(R′) and there is an obvious (now surjective!) map Wδ → W ′
δ.
δ parametrizing all pairs (R′, C ′) with R′ ∈ Rp
More generally, we may define a universal Severi variety of nodal curves with δ marked nodes
δ. There is a
to be the open set of curves in
δ,Sp), we have the
δ : V ∗
δ not containing any exceptional curves in e (note that Wδ ⊂ V ∗
on the smooth locus over Rp, and we denote by V ∗
modular map ψ′
(φ∗
δ)−1(Sp) ∩ V ∗
surjective map
→ Mg as before. Moreover, defining V ∗
δ,Rp the component containing W ′
δ,Rp
δ,Sp
πδ : V ∗
δ,Sp
/ V ∗
δ,Rp
sending (C, R) ∈ V ∗
in R′ under the natural contraction map R → R′.
δ,Sp, where C ⊂ R and R = (R′, T ) ∈ Sp, to (C ′, R′), where C ′ is the image of C
Summarizing, we have the commutative diagrams
(9)
and
(10)
V ∗
δ,Rp
Rp
ψ′
δ
6❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧
=④④④④
④④④④
V ∗
δ,Sp
Mg
ψ∗
δ
V ∗
δ
φ∗
δ
Sp
/ Kp
πδ
πp
W ′
δ
πδ Wδ
Wδ
V ∗
δ,Rp
V ∗
δ,Sp
πδ
The fibers of πδ are all 15-dimensional (isomorphic to a dense open subset of T 1
R′). This shows
that the fibers of ψ∗
δ over curves that come from reducible K3 surfaces have at least one component
that has dimension at least 15. As 15 > 22 − 2g (the expected dimension of the general fiber) for
g > 4, this makes it difficult to prove Theorem 1.1 directly by semicontinuity around elements of
V ∗
. We will circumvent this problem in the next section, to prove Theorem 1.1 for m = 1.
δ,Sp
To this end we start by studying the fibers of the restriction of ψ′
δ to W ′
δ.
/
/
6
o
o
o
o
/
/
=
O
O
o
o
o
o
/
_
_
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
10
C. CILIBERTO, F. FLAMINI, C. GALATI, AND A. L. KNUTSEN
Proposition 5.1. Let p > 3 and g > 1. Then the general fiber of (ψ′
max{0, 7 − g}.
δ)W ′
δ
has dimension at most
Proof. We will assume δ > 1. The case δ = 0 is easier, can be treated in the same way and details
can be left to the reader.
The idea of the proof is to define, in Step 1 below, an incidence variety Iδ, described in terms of the
geometry of the quadric Q = P1 ×P1, and a surjective morphism θδ : Iδ → W ′
δ, with fibers isomorphic
to (Aut(P1))2. Rather than studying the moduli map (ψ′
, we will study its composition σδ with
θδ, which can be described in terms of the geometry of Q. In Step 2 we will study the fibers of σδ.
δ)W ′
δ
With Q = P1 × P1, let πi : Q → P1 for i = 1, 2 be the projections onto the factors. Define
δ :=(Sym2(Q)
Q2
Q2
if δ is odd,
if δ is even
and denote its elements by
(P, Q)δ :=(P + Q ∈ Sym2(Q)
(P, Q) ∈ Q2
if δ is odd,
if δ is even.
Step 1: A basic construction. Consider the locally closed incidence scheme
Iδ ⊂ − KQ × Symg(Q) × Q2
δ
formed by all triples (E, Q1 + · · · + Qg, (P, Q)δ), with E ∈ − KQ, Q1, . . . , Qg ∈ E ⊂ Q, P, Q ∈ E,
such that:
• E is smooth;
• Q = φδ,E(P ) (equivalently, P = φδ,E(Q) for odd δ);
• πi(Q1 + · · · + Qg) is reduced (in particular Q1, . . . , Qg are distinct);
• πi(Dδ,E(P )) and πi(Q1 + · · · + Qg) have no points in common, for i = 1, 2.
The divisor Dδ,E(P ) is the one in Definition 3.2 with Li defined by the projection πiE, for i = 1, 2.
Recall that Dδ,E(P ) = Dδ,E(Q) when δ is odd.
The projection of Iδ to − KQ is dominant, with general fiber of dimension g + 1, hence
Next we define a surjective map
dim(Iδ) = g + 9.
ϑδ : Iδ → W ′
δ
as follows: let ξ = (E, Q1 + · · · + Qg, (P, Q)δ) ∈ Iδ and set Dξ = Dδ,E(P ) + Q1 + · · · + Qg, which is a
degree p + 1 divisor on E. Then OE(Dξ) defines, up to projective transformations, an embedding of
E as an elliptic normal curve E′ ⊂ Pp. The degree 2 line bundles Li defined by the projections πiE
define rational normal scrolls R′
2. The hyperplane
section of R′ cutting out Dξ on E defines a curve C ′
i ⊂ Pp, for i = 1, 2, hence the surface R′ = R′
ξ ∈ Wδ(R′). One defines ϑδ(ξ) = C ′
ξ.
1 ∪ R′
1 ∩ R′
The map ϑδ is surjective. Take a curve C ′ on R′ = R′
δ and
consider E = E′ = R′
2 together with the 2 : 1 projection maps fi : E → γi, where γi is the
residual curve to the line chain of C ′ on R′
i, cf. Definition 4.1. Up to choosing an isomorphism
γi ≃ P1, the map f1 × f2 embeds E as an anticanonical curve in Q. Let Q1, . . . , Qg be the unordered
images of the intersection points γ1 ∩ γ2 ⊂ E and (P, Q)δ be the pair of distinguished points, ordered
if δ is even, and unordered if δ is odd. This defines a point ξ = (E, Q1 + · · · + Qg, (P, Q)δ) ∈ Iδ such
that ϑδ(ξ) = C ′. This argument shows that the fibers of ϑδ are isomorphic to (Aut(P1))2.
2 corresponding to a point of W ′
1 ∪ R′
MODULI OF NODAL CURVES ON K3 SURFACES
11
We have the commutative diagram
Iδ
ϑδ
/ W ′
δ
&▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲
σδ
(ψ′
δ )W′
δ
Mg
where σδ is the composition map.
It can be directly defined as follows. Take ξ = (E, Q1 +
· · · + Qg, (P, Q)δ) ∈ Iδ. Call Γ1 and Γ2 the two P1s such that Q = Γ1 × Γ2. We have the
g points Pi,j = πi(Qj) ∈ Γi, for i = 1, 2 and 1 6 j 6 g.
If δ is even, we get additional
points P1,g+1 = π1(P ) ∈ Γ1 and P2,g+1 = π2(Q) ∈ Γ2.
If δ is odd we get two more points
P1,g+1 = π1(P ), P1,g+2 = π1(Q) on Γ1. Then Γ = σδ(ξ) is obtained (recalling Figure 1) in one
of the following ways:
• When δ is even, by gluing Γ1 and Γ2 with the identification of P1,j with P2,j, for 1 6 j 6 g + 1; in
the case g = 1, we furthermore contract Γ2, thus identifying P1,1 and P1,2 on Γ1.
• When δ is odd, by first identifying P1,g+1 and P1,g+2 on Γ1 and then gluing with Γ2 by identifying
the points P1,j with P2,j, for 1 6 j 6 g; in the cases g 6 2, we furthermore contract Γ2 (when g = 2,
this identifies P1,1 and P1,2 on Γ1, whereas if g = 1, the curve Γ2 is contracted to a smooth point
and no further node is created).
Step 2: The fiber. By Step 1, to understand the general fiber of (ψ′
the general fiber of σδ. This is what we do next.
δ)W ′
δ
, it suffices to understand
δ(W ′
Consider a general element Γ in ψ′
δ). Then Γ = X1 ∪ X2 is a union of two rational components
when g > 3 or g = 2 and δ is even (recall Figure 1). If g = 2 and δ is odd, then Γ is a rational curve
with two nodes and we will substitute Γ with the stably equivalent curve X1 ∪ X2 where X1 is the
normalization of Γ at one of the nodes and X2 ≃ P1 is attached to it at the two inverse images of
the node. (The dimensional count that follows does not depend on the choice of the node on Γ1 and
the two matching points on X2, as we will show below). If g = 1, then Γ is a rational curve with one
node. When δ is even, we will substitute Γ with the stably equivalent curve X1 ∪ X2 where X1 ≃ P1
is the normalization of Γ and X2 ≃ P1 is attached to it at the two inverse images of the node. When
δ is odd, we will substitute Γ with the stably equivalent curve X1 ∪ X2 where X1 ≃ Γ and X2 ≃ P1
is attached to an arbitrary smooth point of X1. (The choice of the matching points on X1 and X2
will again not influence the dimensional count that follows.) Thus, after the substitution, the curve
Γ looks exactly as one of the curves on the right in Figure 1.
Denote by Γ1 and Γ2 the normalizations of X1 and X2, respectively, both isomorphic to P1, so
that Γ1 × Γ2 ≃ Q, up to the action of (Aut(P1))2 (which will contribute to the fiber of σδ). All
curves X1 ∪ X2 stably equivalent to Γ constructed above for g = 1, 2 and δ odd and g = 1 and δ
even are equivalent by this action.
If δ is odd, then X2 = Γ2 ≃ P1, whereas X1 has one node. On Γ1 × Γ2 ≃ Q we have the g
points Qj = (xj, yj), for 1 6 j 6 g, which are identified in Γ.
In addition, we have the divisor
z1 + z2 ∈ Sym2(Γ1) ≃ Sym2(P1) over the node of X1. Then the σδ -- fiber of Γ consists of all
(E, Q1 + · · · + Qg, (P, Q)δ) ∈ Iδ such that E is a smooth curve in − KQ ⊗ JQ1∪···∪Qg satisfying the
additional condition
(11)
Q = φδ,E(P ) and π1(P ) + π1(Q) = z1 + z2.
If δ is even, then Xi ≃ Γ1 ≃ P1, for i = 1, 2, and the intersection points between the two
components yield g + 1 points Qj = (xj, yj) ∈ Q, for 1 6 j 6 g + 1. Then the σδ -- fiber of Γ is the
union of g + 1 components obtained in the following way. Choose an index j ∈ {1, . . . , g + 1}, e.g.,
j = g+1. Then the corresponding component of the fiber consists of all (E, Q1+· · ·+Qg, (P, Q)δ) ∈ Iδ
such that E is a smooth curve in − KQ ⊗ JQ1∪···∪Qg satisfying the additional condition
(12)
Q = φδ,E(P ) and π1(P ) = xg+1, π2(Q) = yg+1.
&
/
12
C. CILIBERTO, F. FLAMINI, C. GALATI, AND A. L. KNUTSEN
Either way, up to the action of (Aut(P1))2, the σδ -- fiber of Γ is contained in − KQ ⊗ JQ1∪···∪Qg ,
and, by assumption, we know that there are smooth curves E ∈ − KQ ⊗ JQ1∪···∪Qg . Hence
dim( − KQ ⊗ JQ1∪···∪Qg ) = max{0, 8 − g}, which proves the assertion if g > 8. (This is clear if
g > 9; if g = 8, the projection Iδ → Sym8(Q) is dominant, whence we may assume that Q1, . . . , Q8
are general points in Q.)
To finish the proof, we have to prove that for g 6 7 and for a general choice of (E, Q1 + · · · +
Qg, (P, Q)δ) ∈ Iδ, condition (11) or (12) defines a proper, closed subscheme of − KQ ⊗ JQ1∪···∪Qg .
Let δ be odd. Let us fix a general point P ∈ Q and let us take a general curve E ∈ − KQ ⊗ JP .
Consider the point Q = φδ,E(P ). Fix then another general E′ ∈ − KQ ⊗ JP , which neither
contains Q nor its conjugate on E via L1. The curves E and E′ intersect at 7 distinct points off
P . Choose Q1, . . . , Qg among them. Then E, E′ ∈ − KQ ⊗ JQ1∪···∪Qg , and E satisfies (11) (with
z1 = π1(P ), z2 = π1(Q)), whereas E′ does not.
The proof for δ even is similar and can be left to the reader.
(cid:3)
Corollary 5.2. Let p > 3, g > 1 and (R0, C0) ∈ Wδ. Set (R′
Γ0 := ψ∗
0)), cf. (9) and (10).
δ ((R0, C0)) = ψ′
δ((R′
0, C ′
0, C ′
0) := πδ((R0, C0)) ∈ W ′
δ and
There is at least one component V0 of (ψ∗
δ )−1(Γ0) containing the whole fiber π−1
δ ((R′
0, C ′
0)), and
any such V0 satisfies
(i) V0 ⊆ Wδ;
(ii) dim(πδ(V0)) 6 max{0, 7 − g}.
0, C ′
δ ((R′
δ )−1(Γ0) ∩ Wδ. Hence there is at least one component V0 of (ψ∗
Proof. (a) As mentioned above, the fiber π−1
,
δ )−1(Γ0)
and it is contained in (ψ∗
containing the whole fiber π−1
0)) and any such component contains some (R, C) ∈ Wδ
satisfying that R = (R′, T ) for a general element T ∈ T 1
R′ . Due to the generality of T , the surface
R lies off the closure of the Noether -- Lefschetz locus in Kp (see [CLM1]). Thus, there can be no
element (S, C) ∈ V0 with S smooth, because Pic(S) ≃ Z, whereas C is reducible, its class in moduli
being Γ0. So, if (S, C) ∈ V0, then S ∈ Sp. Thus V0 ⊆ V ∗
0)) is isomorphic to a dense open subset of T 1
R′
0
δ ((R′
0, C ′
δ ∩ (φ∗
δ)−1(Sp).
t = πp(Rt) ∈ Rp, and the divisor Tt on E′
If dim(V0) = 0, there is nothing more to prove. So assume there is a disc D ⊂ V0 parametrizing
pairs (Rt, Ct) such that ψ∗
δ (Rt, Ct) = Γ0, with Rt ∈ Sp and Ct ∈ Vδ(Rt), for all t ∈ ∆, with R0 = R.
t along which the modification πt : Rt → R′
Consider R′
t
takes place. As π0(C0) ∩ T0 = ∅, we may assume that πt(Ct) ∩ Tt = ∅ for all t ∈ ∆. Hence
Ct ≃ πt(Ct) ⊂ R′
t, for all t ∈ ∆. These nodes
lie on lines contained in πt(Ct). As π0(C0) contains precisely one connected chain of lines (i.e., its
line chain, see Definition 4.1), the same holds for πt(Ct) for all t ∈ ∆. Hence πt(Ct) ∈ Wδ(R′
t), so
that Ct ∈ Wδ(Rt). This proves (i). Assertion (ii) then follows from Proposition 5.1.
(cid:3)
t, which has δ marked nodes on the smooth locus of R′
6. The moduli map for m = 1
In this section we will prove the part of Theorem 1.1 concerning the case m = 1. We circumvent
the problem of the "superabundant" fibers of ψ∗
δ remarked in the previous section by passing to (a
component of) the universal Severi variety over the Hilbert scheme Hp, which is the pullback of the
universal Severi variety V ∗
δ over the locus of smooth, irreducible K3 surfaces.
Proposition 6.1. Let p > 3. One has:
(a) The map ψ∗
(b) The map ψ∗
δ is generically finite for g > 15.
δ is dominant for 1 6 g 6 7.
Proof. There exists a dense, open subset H◦
moduli morphism
p ⊂ Hp, disjoint from R′
p, such that there is a dominant
µp : H◦
p
/ Kp ⊂ Kp.
/
MODULI OF NODAL CURVES ON K3 SURFACES
13
We consider the cartesian diagram
V◦
δ
Φ◦
δ
H◦
p
νp
µp
/ V ∗
δ
φ∗
δ
/ Kp
which defines, in the first column, (a component of) a universal Severi variety over H◦
we can then consider the moduli map Ψ◦
δ fitting in the commutative diagram
p. Accordingly,
V◦
δ
νp
&▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼
Ψ◦
δ
/ V ∗
δ
ψ∗
δ
Mg
and it suffices to prove that the general fiber of Ψ◦
δ has dimension
p2 + 2p + max{0, 22 − 2g} = p2 + 2p + max{0, 7 − g} + max{0, 15 − g},
the equality due to the assumptions on g. We prove this by semicontinuity. To this end we introduce
a partial compactification Vδ of V◦
δ fitting into the commutative diagram
V◦
δ
Φ◦
δ
H◦
p
/ Vδ
Φδ
/ Hp
Take general R′ ∈ R′
The fiber of Φδ over any element R′ ∈ R′
p ⊂ Hp contains the varieties Wδ(R′) by Proposition 4.2
(and Definition 4.4). Possibly after substituting Vδ with a dense, open subset (still containing the
varieties Wδ(R′)), we have a natural moduli map Ψδ : Vδ → Mg extending Ψ◦
δ.
δ((R′, C ′
0)), cf. (9) and (10).
By semicontinuity, it suffices to prove that any component F0 of Ψ−1
δ (Γ) passing through (R′, C ′
0)
has dimension at most p2 + 2p + max{0, 7 − g} + max{0, 15 − g}. This will be done by first bounding
the dimension of F0 ∩ Φ−1
p) and then bounding the dimension of all possible deformations of
(R′, C ′
0 ∈ Wδ(R′) and set Γ := Ψδ((R′, C ′
p). We make this more precise as follows.
0) in F0 outside of Φ−1
p and C ′
0)) = ψ′
δ (R′
δ (R′
Let K be the reduced affine tangent cone to F0 at (R′, C ′
0). Consider the linear map
L : TF0,(R′,C′
0)
/ THp,R′
/ H 0(T 1
R′ ),
defined by composing the differential d(R′,C′
restriction LK to K. By standard deformation theory, L−1
K
to F0 ∩ Φ−1
p) at (R′, C ′
0). Therefore,
δ (R′
0)(ΦδF0) of Φδ at (R′, C ′
0) with the map (5), and its
(0) coincides with the affine tangent cone
dim(F0) = dim(K) 6 dim(F0 ∩ Φ−1
δ (R′
p)) + dim(L(K))
and we are done once we prove that
(13)
and
(14)
dim(F0 ∩ Φ−1
δ (R′
p)) 6 p2 + 2p + max{0, 7 − g}
dim(L(K′)) 6 max{0, 15 − g} for any irreducible component K′ of K.
/
/
&
/
/
/
/
/
14
C. CILIBERTO, F. FLAMINI, C. GALATI, AND A. L. KNUTSEN
Proof of (13): Under the PGL(p + 1, C)-quotient map
Φ−1
δ (R′
p)
V ∗
δ,Rp
Φδ
R′
p
/ Rp
δ (R′
δ. The component V0 of (ψ∗
the variety F0 ∩ Φ−1
p) is mapped with fibers of dimension p2 + 2p to a variety V ′
δ,Sp containing (πδ)−1(V ′
δ,Rp intersecting W ′
V ∗
(10)) lies in Wδ and satisfies dim(πδ(V0)) 6 {0, 7−g} by Corollary 5.2. Therefore dim(V ′
by the surjectivity of πδ, proving (13).
Proof of (14): We may assume that F0 contains a one -- parameter family containing (R′, C ′
such that its general point is a pair (S, C) with S 6∈ R′
nothing more to prove.
p, otherwise F0 = F0 ∩ Φ−1
δ )−1(Γ) ∩ V ∗
δ)−1(Γ) ⊆
0 ⊆ (ψ′
0) (cf. (9) and
0) 6 {0, 7−g}
0) and
p) and there is
δ (R′
We claim that S has at most isolated singularities. Indeed, suppose S is singular along a curve
Σ and let S be the total space of the family. Then the flat limit of Σ on the central fiber sits in
the singular locus scheme of R′, which is E′. Since E′ is a general elliptic normal curve (hence it
is smooth and irreducible), then also Σ is an elliptic normal curve and S, as well as R′, has simple
normal crossings along Σ. Then S has normal crossings along the surface which is the total space
of the family of singular curves of the surfaces S. Let S ′ be the normalization of S. The central
1 and R′
fiber of S ′ consists of two smooth connected components, i.e., the proper transforms of R′
2.
This implies that the general fiber of S ′ is also disconnected, consisting of two smooth components
isomorphic to R′
p, a contradiction, which proves
the claim.
2. Therefore the general fiber S of S sits in R′
1 and R′
Since S has (at most) isolated singularities and degenerates to R′, it must have at worst An --
singularities, so it is a projective model of a smooth K3 surface. Thus we may find a one -- dimensional
δ parametrized by the disc D, such that R := S0 ∈ Sp and πp(R) = R′
family (St, Ct)t∈D of points in V ∗
(that is, R is a birational modification of R′), C0 is the total transform of a C ′
δ (St, Ct) = Γ
for all t ∈ D, and St is smooth for all t ∈ D − {0}.
0 on R′, ψ∗
Since Γ has g + 1 nodes, the curves Ct (including C0) have at least g + 1 unmarked nodes mapping
to the nodes of Γ through the process of partial normalization at the δ marked nodes and possibly
semi-stable reduction. On C0 they must lie on the smooth locus of R. (Indeed, it is well-known,
and can be verified by a local computation, that a node of a limit curve lying on E smooths as R
smooths, cf. e.g. [Ch], [Ga, §2] or [GK, Pf. of Lemma 3.4].) This means that these nodes of C0 lie
on the exceptional curves of the morphism R → R′. Therefore the g intersection points γ1 ∩ γ2 (all
lying on the elliptic curve E′) plus one (at least) among the intersections of the line cycle of C ′
0 with
the elliptic curve E′ are contained in the divisor T ∈ T 1
R′. Hence, we have g + 1 6 deg(W ) = 16,
R′ ) − (g + 1) = 15 − g for any irreducible component K′ of
and if g 6 14, we have dim(L(K′)) 6 h0(T 1
K, proving (14). Therefore, we have left to prove that the case g = 15 cannot happen.
To this end, assume g = 15. The above argument shows that the g intersection points γ1 ∩ γ2 plus
R′, for some integer 0 6 k 6 δ (cf. Definition
a point x = φk,E′(P ) are the zeroes of a section of T 1
3.2).
If δ is odd, the g intersection points γ1 ∩ γ2 are in LE′ ⊗ (L∗
⊗ δ+1
2
OE′(x) ≃ T 1
R′ ⊗ L∗
E′ ⊗ L
2
2)⊗ δ+1
2 . It follows that
which implies that x is uniquely determined, hence also the line chain of C ′
that C ′
0 is general in Wδ(R′).
If δ is even, the g intersection points γ1 ∩ γ2 are in
0 is, contradicting the fact
LE′ ⊗ OE′(−P ) ⊗ (L∗
2 = LE′ ⊗ OE′(−Q) ⊗ (L∗
1)⊗ δ
2)⊗ δ
2 .
/
/
/
MODULI OF NODAL CURVES ON K3 SURFACES
15
Hence
(15)
OE′(x) ≃ T 1
R′ ⊗ L∗
E′ ⊗ OE′(P ) ⊗ L
⊗ δ
1 ≃ T 1
2
R′ ⊗ L∗
E′ ⊗ OE′(Q) ⊗ L
⊗ δ
2
2
.
If k is odd, combining (6) (with y replaced by P ) with (15) yields
OE′(2P ) ≃ LE′ ⊗ (T 1
R′)∗ ⊗ L
⊗ k+1
2
2
⊗ (L∗
1)⊗ k+δ−1
2
,
which implies only finitely many choices for P , and we get a contradiction as before. If k is even,
then (7), with x and y replaced by P and x respectively, combined with (15) yields
LE′ ≃ T 1
R′ ⊗ L
⊗ k
2 ⊗ L
2
⊗ δ−k
1
2
,
which, together with (3) gives a non-trivial relation between LE′, L1 and L2, a contradiction.
(cid:3)
At this point, the proof of Theorem 1.1 for m = 1 is complete (noting that the assertion is trivial
for g = 0).
7. More limits of nodal curves on reducible K3 surfaces
In order to treat the case m > 1 we need to consider more limits of nodal curves on surfaces in
Sp. They are similar to the ones constructed by X. Chen in [Ch, §3.2].
Definition 7.1. For each m > 1, R ∈ Sp and the corresponding R′ := πp(R) ∈ Rp, we define
U ′
m(R′) ⊂ mLR′ to be the locally closed subset of curves of the form
C ′ = C 1
1 ∪ C 1
2 ∪ · · · ∪ C 1
m−1 ∪ C 1
m ∪ C 2
1 ∪ C 2
2 ∪ · · · ∪ C 2
m−1 ∪ C 2
m
i for i = 1, 2 and 1 6 j 6 m − 1;
where:
• C i
• C i
• C i
• there are points P, Q0, . . . , Q2m, Q on E′ such that
j ⊂ R′
j ∈ σi for 1 6 j 6 m − 1 and C i
j ∈ σi + Fi for 1 6 j 6 m − 1 and C i
m ∈ σi + mlFi if p = 2l + 1 is odd;
m ∈ σi + (ml − m + 1)Fi if p = 2l is even;
C 1
j ∩ E′ = Q2j−2 + Q2j−1,
C 1
m ∩ E′ = 2mlQ + P + Q2m−2, C 2
j ∩ E′ = Q2j−1 + Q2j,
C 2
m ∩ E′ = 2mlQ + P + Q0,
for
1 6 j 6 m − 1
if p is odd, and
C 1
j ∩ E′ = Q2j−2 + 2Q2j−1,
C 2
j ∩ E′ = 2Q2j−1 + Q2j,
1 6 j 6 m − 1
C 1
m ∩ E′ = (2ml − 2m + 1)Q + P + Q2m−2, C 2
m ∩ E′ = (2ml − 2m + 1)Q + P + Q0,
if p is even.
We denote by Um(R) ⊂ mLR the set of total transforms of the curves in U ′
m(R′) passing through
two points of T different from Q.
We remark that the curves in U ′
m(R′) (or Um(R)) are tacnodal at Q and, for even p, also at Qi
3(R′) for odd p. The intersections on E′ (which are not
with i odd. Figure 7 depicts a member of U ′
all shown in the figure) are marked with dots and are all transversal except at Q. The case of p even
is similar, except that the intersections at Q1 and Q3 are tangential.
Lemma 7.2. We have dim(U ′
m(R′)) = 2 and dim(Um(R)) = 0.
Proof. It is easily seen that any of the three maps U ′
(Q, Q2m−2), respectively, is an isomorphism, proving the lemma.
m(R′) → E′2 mapping C ′ to (Q, P ),(Q, Q0) and
(cid:3)
16
C. CILIBERTO, F. FLAMINI, C. GALATI, AND A. L. KNUTSEN
C 1
2
C 1
1
Q3
Q
2
Q
1
Q
4
Q0
Q
P
C 1
3
C 2
2
C 2
1
C 2
3
Figure 2. Sketch of a member of U ′
3(R′) when p is odd.
Proposition 7.3. For any m > 1, the curves in Um(R) deform to a set Um(S) of rational nodal
curves in mL on the general [S, L] ∈ Kp.
More precisely, there is a 19-dimensional subvariety Um ⊂ Vm,p(m) with a partial compactification
U m → Kp whose fiber over R ∈ Sp is Um(R) and whose fiber Um(S) over a general S ∈ Kp is a
nonempty finite subset of Vm,p(m)(S).
Proof. This follows the lines of proof in [Ch, §3.2] or [GK, Proof of Thm. 1.1]. For the reader's
convenience, we outline here the main ideas, without dwelling on details.
Take a curve C ∈ Um(R) that is the total transform of a general curve C ′ ∈ U ′
If p = 2l + 1 is odd, then C has a total of 2lm(m − 1) + 2 nodes on the smooth locus of R:
m(R′).
• two nodes occur on the two exceptional curves of e that C contains;
• the remaining nodes are the points C i
j ∩ C i
m for i = 1, 2, 1 6 j 6 m − 1, a total of 2(m − 1) times
C i
j · C i
m = σi · (σi + mlFi) = ml.
Moreover, the point Q on C is a 2ml -- tacnode, which can be (locally) deformed to 2ml − 1 nodes
for a general deformation of R to a K3 surface (see [Ra], [CH, Sect. 2.4] or [GK, Thm 3.1] for a
generalization of this result). Since, by construction, C does not contain subcurves lying in hLR
for any 1 6 h 6 m − 1 (this is like saying that the aforementioned singularities of C are non --
disconnecting), one checks that, for a general deformation of [R, LR] to a K3 surface [S, L], the
curve C deforms to an irreducible, nodal curve in mL with a total of
h2nm(m − 1) + 2i +h2mn − 1i = 2nm2 + 1 = p(m)
nodes, as claimed.
The case p even is similar and can be left to the reader.
(cid:3)
MODULI OF NODAL CURVES ON K3 SURFACES
17
8. Dominance of the moduli map for m > 2
In this section we will use Proposition 6.1 and the curves in Definition 7.1 to prove part (A) of
Theorem 1.1 for m > 2. We assume p > 3 in the whole section.
The following Proposition fixes a gap in [CK1, Prop. 1.2], whose proof is incomplete, cf. [CK2]:
Proposition 8.1. Let S ∈ Kp be general and m > 1 be an integer. Let V be a fully complete
component of Vm,δ(S). Then the moduli map
is generically finite. In particular this applies to any component of V ∗
δ (S).
Proof. By fully completeness, we have the filtration
ψm,δ V : V → Mgm,δ
∅ 6= V[m,δ,p(m)](S) ∩ V ⊂ V[m,δ,p(m)−1](S) ∩ V ⊂ . . . ⊂ V[m,δ,δ+1](S) ∩ V ⊂ V
Set Vi = ψm,δ(V[m,δ,p(m)−i](S) ∩ V ), for 0 6 i 6 gm,δ − 1, and Vgm,δ = ψm,δ(V ). Then we have
∅ 6= V0 ( V1 ( . . . ( Vgm,δ−1 ( Vgm,δ ,
where V i is a proper closed subvariety of V i−1 for all i = 0, . . . , gm,δ − 1.
Since dim(V0) = 0, we have dim(Vgm,δ ) > gm,δ, which yields the first assertion. The final assertion
(cid:3)
follows by Remark 4.5.
Remark 8.2. The existence of fully complete components V of Vm,δ(S) for all m > 1, for a general
S ∈ Kp, follows from the existence of irreducible nodal rational curves in mL proved in [Ch] (or by
Proposition 7.3). Thus the general point in V parametrizes an irreducible curve.
In particular, Proposition 8.1 shows that the moduli map ψm,p(m)−1 : Vm,p(m)−1 → M1 is dominant
even when restricted to curves on a single general K3, for any m > 1.
Next we need a technical construction and a lemma. Consider the commutative diagram
V ∗
δ
φ∗
δ
Kp
eψδ
ψ∗
δ
&▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼
/ eMg1,δ
ϕδ
Mg1,δ
where the triangle is the Stein factorization of ψ∗
δ . We will abuse notation and we will identify an
element Γ ∈ eMg1,δ with its image in Mg1,δ .
Assume 1 6 g1,δ 6 7. By Proposition 6.1, given a general Γ ∈ Im(eψδ), the fiber eψ−1
irreducible of dimension
δ (Γ) is
Set T (Γ) := φ∗
δ (Γ)) which is irreducible and, by Proposition 8.1, one has
δ (Γ)) = dim(V ∗
dim(eψ−1
δ ) − dim(eMg1,δ ) = 22 − 2g1,δ.
δ (Γ)) = 22 − 2g1,δ.
(16)
δ(eψ−1
dim(T (Γ)) = dim(eψ−1
Now we need to introduce the irreducible component V •
over S ∈ Kp we will denote by V •
integers, with s 6 4 (hence g1,δ + s 6 11), there are on S finitely many curves of the form
p of V 1,p containing Wp−2,2, whose fibre
p (S). Consider a general S ∈ Kp. For any pair (s, a) of positive
(17)
Z = B1 + · · · + Bs−1 + Bs, with Bi ∈ V •
p (S),
where Ua(S) is as in Proposition 7.3 (cf. Definition 7.1).
for 1 6 i 6 s − 1, and Bs ∈ Ua(S),
Given a general (S, C) ∈ V ∗
For all S′ ∈ T (Γ), we have a morphism Γ → S′, whose image we denote by C ′, and each of the curves
Bi on S′ cuts out on C ′ a divisor, which can be pulled -- back to a divisor gi on Γ, for 1 6 i 6 s.
δ , set Γ := eψδ(S, C), which is the (class of the) normalization eC of C.
&
/
18
C. CILIBERTO, F. FLAMINI, C. GALATI, AND A. L. KNUTSEN
Let T ⊂ (Sym2(Γ))s × T (Γ) be the incidence subvariety described by the points
((d1, . . . , ds), S′) ∈ (Sym2(Γ))s × T (Γ)
such that di 6 gi, with gi the divisor cut out by Bi ⊂ S′ on Γ, for all i = 1, . . . , s. Then let I be the
image of T in (Sym2(Γ))s.
Lemma 8.3. In the above setting:
(i) I = (Sym2(Γ))s;
(ii) for the general S′ ∈ T (Γ) the curves of the form C ′ + Z (with Z as in (17)) are nodal.
Proof. We specialize (S, C) ∈ V ∗
Mg1,δ , and prove the assertions (i) and (ii) in the limit situation for Γ0 and T (Γ0).
δ to (R0, C0) ∈ Wδ, set Γ := ψ∗
δ (S, C) ∈ Mg1,δ and Γ0 = ψ∗
δ (R0, C0) ∈
δ (S′) with ψ∗
Each S′ ∈ T (Γ0) contains a curve C ′ ∈ V ∗
δ (C ′) = Γ0. By the proof of Proposition
6.1, all components of T (Γ0) = φ∗
δ (Γ0)) have dimension at most 22 − 2g1,δ. By (16) we conclude
that all components of T (Γ0) have dimension precisely 22 − 2g1,δ. In particular, this applies to the
δ )−1(Γ0) satisfying the conditions in
component T0 := φ∗
Corollary 5.2. We recall that V0 contains (R0, C0) and satisfies dim(πδ(V0)) 6 max{0, 7 − g1,δ} by
Corollary 5.2(b), and T0 lies in the specialization of T (Γ) = φ∗
δ (Γ)). Therefore, recalling again
(9), we have
δ(V0), cf. (9), where V0 is a component of (ψ∗
δ( ψ−1
δ( ψ−1
dim(πp(T0)) = dim(πp(φ∗
δ(V0))) 6 dim(πδ(V0)) 6 max{0, 7 − g1,δ}
and the general fiber of πpT0
has dimension
f > dim(T0) − max{0, 7 − g1,δ} > 22 − 2g1,δ − max{0, 7 − g1,δ} = min{22 − 2g1,δ, 15 − g1,δ} > 2s
(remember the assumptions on s and g1,δ). Then, inside T0 we can find a subscheme T ′
0 of dimension
at least 2s consisting solely of surfaces that are birational modifications of a fixed R′ and it is therefore
parametrized by a family X (of dimension at least 2s) of divisors in T 1
R′. For R corresponding to
the general point of X , the curves in V •
p (S′) for general
S′ ∈ T (Γ), and similarly the curves in Ua(R) are limits of rational nodal curves in Ua(S′) (see
Proposition 7.3). We will prove that (i) and (ii) hold by proving that they hold in the limiting
situation on R.
p (R) are limits of rational nodal curves in V •
s−1, B′
U ′
s−1 + B′
1, . . . , B′
1 + · · · + B′
s) ∈ Wδ(R′) × (Wp−2(R′))s−1 ×
s is nodal off the tacnodes of B′
s.
a(R′) and do not cause any non-nodal singularities in C0 + B′
We first claim that for the general element (C0, B′
a(R′), the curve C0 + B′
To prove the claim, note that for any 0 6 j 6 p − 1, the variety Wp−j(R′) parametrizes a j --
dimensional family of curves. Its general element contains a line chain, that varies in a 1 -- dimensional,
base point free system, so the lines of these chains are in general different from lines contained in the
s−1 + B′
general member of U ′
s.
Fixing a line chain C, the family of curves in Wp−j(R′) containing it is a linear system LC of dimension
j −1, whose general element, minus C, is a smooth rational curve on every R′
i, so that LC is base point
s−1 in Wp−2(R′) intersect both C0
free off C whenever j > 2. Hence, the general curves B′
and B′
s transversely.
It remains to prove that the latter holds also when δ = p − 1, that is, when g1,δ = 1. As we saw,
non-transversal intersections can only occur off the line chain of C0, that is, on the two components
γi ⊂ R′
s as in Definition
7.1.
s transversely, and if δ < p − 1, then also the general C0 in Wδ(R′) intersects B′
j, i = 1, 2, 1 6 j 6 m the components of B′
i, i = 1, 2, of C0. Denote by C i
1 + · · · + B′
1, . . . , B′
If p = 2l + 1 is odd, then R′
i ≃ P1 × P1 and γi ∼ C i
j ∼ σi, for i = 1, 2 and 1 6 j 6 m − 1.
Hence γi only intersects the component C i
s with fixed
tacnode Q = C 1
m varies freely in the
linear system (σi + mlFi) ⊗ JZ, where Z is the length -- (ml) subscheme of E′ supported at Q. This
linear system is base point free off Q. It follows that each γi intersects the general C i
m transversely,
whence C0 intersects the general B′
m (see Definition 7.1 and Figure 7), each component C i
s. As we vary the curves B′
m ∈ σi + mlFi of B′
m ∩ C 2
s transversely.
MODULI OF NODAL CURVES ON K3 SURFACES
19
If p = 2l is even, then R′
1 6 j 6 m − 1. Hence, γ1 · C 1
check that γi intersects C i
the case p odd.
i ≃ F1, γ1 ∼ σ1 + F1, γ2 ∼ σ2 and C i
j = 1 and γ2 · C 2
j ∼ σi + Fi, for i = 1, 2 and
j = 0 for 1 6 j 6 m − 1 and we again only need to
m ∈ σi + (ml − m + 1)Fi transversely, which can be proved exactly as in
s−1, B′
1, . . . , B′
s) ∈ (Wp−2(R′))s−1 × U ′
This finishes the proof of the claim.
Since the curves B′
i move in an at least two-dimensional family, for 1 6 i 6 s, the curves
Z ′
s−1 + B′
1 + · · · + B′
0 := B′
s cuts out on C0 an algebraic system G and the associated variety
I′ equals (Sym2(C0))s. Hence, for the general s -- tuple of pairs of points of C0, we may find a
(B′
0 contains the given points on C0 and is
0 cuts E′ in p + 1 points for 1 6 i 6 s − 1 and in at
nodal off the tacnodes of B′
least 3 points off the tacnodes if i = s. Since dim(X ) > 2s, we can find a surface R corresponding
to a point of X for which the modification R → R′ involves two of the intersection points of each B′
i
with E′ for 1 6 i 6 s (off the tacnodes if i = s). We denote by Z0 the total transform of Z ′
0 on R.
Then R ∈ T0, and we denote by B0,i the total transform of each B′
i on R, for 1 6 i 6 s. Then such
a curve is the limit of a nodal rational curve in V •
p (S′) for 1 6 i 6 s − 1, and B0,s is the limit of a
nodal rational curve in Ua(S′).
a(R′) such that Z ′
s. Each B′
i in Z ′
Thus, we have proved that (i) and (ii) hold in the limiting situation for R, C0 and Z0. Hence,
(cid:3)
they also hold in general.
Let s 6 4 and a be positive integers. Then for [S, L] ∈ Kp general we can consider the locally
closed subset V(δ,s,a)(S) in (s + a)L consisting of all nodal curves of the form C + Z, with (S, C) ∈
V ∗
δ (S) and Z as in (17). Note that V(δ,s,a)(S) is non -- empty for [S, L] general by Lemma 8.3 and
In the same way, we have the universal family V(δ,s,a) → Kp, with fiber
dim(V(δ,s,a)(S)) = g1,δ.
V(δ,s,a)(S) over S.
Marking all the nodes of a curve C + Z but two in the divisor gi cut out by Bi on C, for 1 6 i 6 s,
one checks that the normalizations are 2-connected, hence these curves lie in Vm,ζ(S), where m = s+a
and ζ = p(m) − g1,δ − s, with stable models in Mg1,δ+s as shown in Figure 3 below.
In this way we determine (at least) an irreducible, fully complete component V ∗
m,ζ of V m,ζ with
its moduli map
ψ∗
m,ζ : V ∗
m,ζ → Mg1,δ+s.
(Note that V ∗
1,δ = V ∗
δ .)
Proposition 8.4. Let p > 3. Let g and s be positive integers with 1 6 g 6 7, g 6 p and s 6 4. Set
ζ = p(m) − g − s. Then, for any integer m > s + 1, the map ψ∗
m,ζ is dominant.
Proof. We keep the notation introduced above. Take a general Γ ∈ Mg and let (xi, yi), for 1 6 i 6 s,
be general pairs of points on Γ. By Proposition 6.1 and Lemma 8.3 we may construct nodal curves
C = C + B1 + · · · + Bs ∈ V(δ,s,m−s)(S), with xi + yi 6 gi,
for 1 6 i 6 s,
1,δ = V ∗
where δ = p − g, (S, C) ∈ V ∗
δ (C). The stable model Γ of the curve obtained
by normalizing C at all the marked nodes, is the curve obtained by pairwise identifying the inverse
images of the points xi, yi on Γ, for 1 6 i 6 s. This is, by construction, a general member of
the s -- codimensional locus ∆s,g+s of irreducible s -- nodal curves in Mg+s, which therefore sits in the
closure of the image of ψ∗
δ and Γ = ψ∗
m,ζ.
We claim that any component of V(δ,s,m−s) is a whole component of (ψ∗
m,ζ )−1(∆s,g+s). Indeed, if it
were not, then the general member of the component containing it would be a curve C ∗ specializing
to C, which means that the normalization of C ∗ at its marked nodes would consist of a component
of arithmetic genus g + s′ with s′ 6 s nodes (giving rise, in the specialization, to s′ of the rational
curves Bi in C), plus s − s′ rational curves (tending to the remaining curves Bi in C). In any event,
C ∗ has geometric genus g. So the relative dimension over Kp of such a family is g, equal to the
relative dimension of V(δ,s,m−s), a contradiction.
20
C. CILIBERTO, F. FLAMINI, C. GALATI, AND A. L. KNUTSEN
Β
2
Β
1
C
stable model
Figure 3. Members of V(δ,s,a)(S), s = 2, with marked nodes the ones without dots,
and the stable model.
It follows that the fiber dimension over ∆s,g+s is
dim(V(δ,s,m−s)) − dim(∆s,g+s) = (g + 19) − (3(g + s) − 3 − s) = 22 − 2(g + s),
hence the general fiber of ψ∗
dim(Im(ψ∗
m,ζ has at most this dimension, so
m,ζ )) > [g + s + 19] − [22 − 2(g + s)] = 3(g + s) − 3
proving the assertion.
(cid:3)
Corollary 8.5. Assume p > 3. With g := p(m) − δ, the map ψ∗
• m = 2, 2 6 g 6 8 and p > g − 1;
• m = 3, 2 6 g 6 9 and p > g − 2;
• m = 4, 2 6 g 6 10 and p > g − 3;
• m > 5, 2 6 g 6 11 and p > g − 4.
m,δ is dominant if:
Proof. For any 1 6 s 6 4, Proposition 8.4 ensures dominance of ψ∗
and p > g − s, proving the result.
m,δ if m > s + 1, 1 + s 6 g 6 7 + s
(cid:3)
Together with Remark 8.2, and the fact that the assertion is trivial for g = 0, this finishes the
proof of Theorem 1.1(A) for m > 2.
9. Generic finiteness of the moduli map for m > 2
In this section we will use Proposition 6.1 and Corollary 8.5 to prove generic finiteness of ψ∗
m,δ for
m > 1 as in Theorem 1.1.
The following lemma is trivial and the proof can be left to the reader:
Lemma 9.1. If there exists a component V ⊆ Vm,δ such that ψm,δ V is generically finite onto its
image, then for each component W ⊆ Vm,δ−1 such that V is included in W (see Remark 2.1), the
map ψm,δ−1W is generically finite onto its image.
MODULI OF NODAL CURVES ON K3 SURFACES
21
Lemma 9.2. Assume that γ and µ are integers such that ψµ,p(µ)−γ is generically finite onto its image
on a component V ′ of Vµ,p(µ)−γ. Let a > 1 and b > 0 be integers such that there is a component V ′′
of Va,p(a)−b satisfying:
(i) for general (S, C) ∈ V ′ and (S, D) ∈ V ′′, D intersects C transversally;
(ii) for general [S] ∈ Kp, the restriction ψa,p(a)−bV ′′(S) is generically finite, where V ′′(S) denotes the
fiber of (φa,p(a)−b)V ′′ : V ′′ → Kp over [S].
Then for m = µ + a and δ = p(µ + a) − (γ + b + 1), the map ψm,δ is generically finite onto its image
on some component V of Vm,δ.
ψa,p(a)−b(D) ∈ Mb. Then (S, C + D) corresponds to a point of a component V of Vm,δ, if we consider
as marked nodes of C + D all of its nodes but two in C ∩ D. Let ψ = ψm,δ V . This map sends C + D
Proof. Pick general elements in V ′ and V ′′ like in (i), with eC = ψµ,p(µ)−γ (C) ∈ Mγ and eD =
to eC plus eD glued at two point (with a further contraction of eD if b = 0).
We denote by B ⊂ V the subset of curves of the form C ′ + D′ where C ′ and D′ are in V ′ and V ′′,
respectively. Then dim(B) = 19 + γ + b.
Because of the hypotheses, the map ψB is generically finite onto its image. Hence dim(Im(ψB)) =
19 + γ + b. Since the general element of Im(ψ) is smooth, we must have dim(Im(ψ)) > 20 + γ + b.
Therefore, the general fiber of ψ has dimension at most
dim(V) − (20 + γ + b) = [19 + (γ + b + 1)] − (20 + γ + b) = 0,
and the result follows.
(cid:3)
Corollary 9.3. The map ψm,δ is generically finite on some component of Vm,δ in the following cases,
with g := p(m) − δ:
• 2 6 m 6 4, g > 16 and p > 15;
• m > 5, p > 7 and g > 11.
Proof. Let m > 2. If p > 15, we apply Lemma 9.2 with µ = 1, γ = 15, a = m − 1 > 1, b = 0,
V ′ = V ∗
p−15, the component for which we proved generic finiteness of ψp−15 in Proposition 6.1 and
V ′′ = Ua ⊆ Va,p(a) the component consisting of rational curves that degenerate to a curves of the
type Ua(R) as in Definition 7.1, cf. Proposition 7.3. Condition (ii) of Lemma 9.2 is satisfied and
an argument as in the proof of Lemma 8.3 shows that also condition (i) is satisfied. Then Lemma
9.2 implies that ψm,δ is generically finite on a suitable component of the universal Severi variety for
g = 16. Lemma 9.1 yields that ψm,δ is generically finite on some component for all g > 16, as stated.
If m > 5, p > 7 and g = 11, the map ψm,δ is generically finite on some component of Vm,δ by
(cid:3)
Corollary 8.5, hence Lemma 9.1 yields the same for all g > 11.
This proves Theorem 1.1(B) for m > 2.
References
[CH]
[Ch]
[CD]
L. Caporaso, J. Harris, Parameter spaces for curves on surfaces and enumeration of rational curves, Compos.
Math. 113 (1998), 155 -- 208.
X. Chen, Rational curves on K3 surfaces, J. Alg. Geom. 8 (1999), 245 -- 278.
C. Ciliberto, Th. Dedieu, On universal Severi varieties of low genus K3 surfaces, Math. Z. 271 (2012),
953 -- 960.
[CFGK] C. Ciliberto, F. Flamini, C. Galati, A. L. Knutsen, Degeneration of differentials and moduli of nodal curves
on K3 surfaces, preprint arXiv:1701.07224 (2017).
[CK1] C. Ciliberto, A. L. Knutsen, On k-gonal loci in Severi varieties on general K3 surfaces and rational curves
on hyperkähler manifolds, J. Math. Pures Appl. 101 (2014), 473 -- 494.
[CK2] C. Ciliberto, A. L. Knutsen, Errata corrige to "On k-gonal loci in Severi varieties on general K3 surfaces and
rational curves on hyperkähler manifolds", to appear.
[CLM1] C. Ciliberto, A. F. Lopez, R. Miranda, Projective degenerations of K3 surfaces, Gaussian maps and Fano
threefolds, Invent. Math. 114 (1993), 641 -- 667.
22
C. CILIBERTO, F. FLAMINI, C. GALATI, AND A. L. KNUTSEN
[CLM2] C. Ciliberto, A. F. Lopez, and R. Miranda, Classification of varieties with canonical curve section via Gaussian
[EC]
maps on canonical curves, Amer. J. Math. 120(1) (1998), 1 -- 21.
F. Enriques, O. Chisini, Lezioni sulla teoria geometrica delle equazioni e delle funzioni algebriche, volume I,
1915; volume II, 1918, volume III, 1924, volume IV, 1934, Zanichelli, Bologna.
[FKPS] F. Flamini, A. L. Knutsen, G. Pacienza, E. Sernesi, Nodal curves with general moduli on K3 surfaces, Comm.
[Fr1]
[Fr2]
[Ga]
[GK]
[Ha]
[Ke]
[Ku]
[MM]
[Mu1]
[Mu2]
[PP]
[Ra]
[Se]
[Ta]
Algebra 36 (2008), 3955 -- 3971.
R. Friedman, Global smoothings of varieties with normal crossings, Annals of Math. 118 (1983), 75 -- 114.
R. Friedman, A new proof of the global Torelli theorem for K3 surfaces, Annals of Math. 120 (1984), 237 -- 269.
C. Galati, Degenerating curves and surfaces: first results, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 58 (2009), 211 -- 243.
C. Galati, A. L. Knutsen, On the existence of curves with Ak-singularities on K3 surfaces, Math. Res. Lett.
21 (2014), 1069 -- 1109.
J. Harris, On the Severi problem, Invent. Math. 84 (1986), 445 -- 461.
M. Kemeny, The moduli of singular curves on K3 surfaces, J. Math. Pures Appl. 104 (2015), 882 -- 920.
V. Kulikov, Degenerations of K3 surfaces and Enriques surfaces, Math. USSR Izvestiya 11 (1977), 957 -- 989.
S. Mori, S. Mukai, The uniruledness of the moduli space of curves of genus 11, Algebraic Geometry, Proc.
Tokyo/Kyoto, 334 -- 353, Lecture Notes in Math. 1016, Springer, Berlin, 1983.
S. Mukai, Curves, K3 surfaces and Fano 3-folds of genus 6 10. Algebraic geometry and commutative algebra,
Vol. I, 357 -- 377, Kinokuniya, Tokyo (1988).
S. Mukai, Fano 3 -- folds, , in "Complex Projective Geometry", LMS Lecture Notes Series, 179 (1992), 255 -- 261.
U. Persson, H. Pinkham, Degenerations of surfaces with trivial canonical bundle, Annals of Math. 113 (1981),
45 -- 66.
Z. Ran, Enumerative geometry of singular plane curves, Invent. Math. 97 (1989), 447 -- 465.
F. Severi, Vorlesungen über algebraische Geometrie, Teubner, Leipzig, 1921.
A. Tannenbaum, Families of curves with nodes on K − 3 surfaces, Math. Ann. 260 (1982), 239 -- 253.
Ciro Ciliberto, Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca
Scientifica, 00173 Roma, Italy
E-mail address: [email protected]
Flaminio Flamini, Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca
Scientifica, 00173 Roma, Italy
E-mail address: [email protected]
Concettina Galati, Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, Università della Calabria, via P.
Bucci, cubo 31B, 87036 Arcavacata di Rende (CS), Italy
E-mail address: [email protected]
Andreas Leopold Knutsen, Department of Mathematics, University of Bergen, Postboks 7800,
5020 Bergen, Norway
E-mail address: [email protected]
|
1807.04097 | 2 | 1807 | 2019-06-19T09:41:14 | A version of the Berglund-H\"ubsch-Henningson duality with non-abelian groups | [
"math.AG"
] | A. Takahashi suggested a conjectural method to find mirror symmetric pairs consisting of invertible polynomials and symmetry groups generated by some diagonal symmetries and some permutations of variables. Here we generalize the Saito duality between Burnside rings to a case of non-abelian groups and prove a "non-abelian" generalization of the statement about the equivariant Saito duality property for invertible polynomials. It turns out that the statement holds only under a special condition on the action of the subgroup of the permutation group called here PC ("parity condition"). An inspection of data on Calabi-Yau threefolds obtained from quotients by non-abelian groups shows that the pairs found on the basis of the method of Takahashi have symmetric pairs of Hodge numbers if and only if they satisfy PC. | math.AG | math |
A version of the Berglund -- Hubsch -- Henningson
duality with non-abelian groups
Wolfgang Ebeling and Sabir M. Gusein-Zade ∗
Abstract
A. Takahashi suggested a conjectural method to find mirror symmetric
pairs consisting of invertible polynomials and symmetry groups generated by
some diagonal symmetries and some permutations of variables. Here we gener-
alize the Saito duality between Burnside rings to a case of non-abelian groups
and prove a "non-abelian" generalization of the statement about the equiv-
ariant Saito duality property for invertible polynomials. It turns out that the
statement holds only under a special condition on the action of the subgroup
of the permutation group called here PC ("parity condition"). An inspec-
tion of data on Calabi -- Yau threefolds obtained from quotients by non-abelian
groups shows that the pairs found on the basis of the method of Takahashi
have symmetric pairs of Hodge numbers if and only if they satisfy PC.
1
Introduction
Mirror symmetry in mathematics started from the celebrated observation by physi-
cists that there existed pairs of Calabi -- Yau manifolds with symmetric sets of Hodge
numbers. P. Berglund, T. Hubsch and M. Henningson ([2], [1]) found a method to
construct mirror symmetric Calabi -- Yau manifolds using so-called invertible poly-
nomials: see details below. They considered pairs (f, G) consisting of an invertible
polynomial f and a (finite abelian) group G of diagonal symmetries of f . To a pair
These pairs are also considered as orbifold Landau -- Ginzburg models. The construc-
tion in [2], [1] involves the quotient stacks of the hypersurfaces defined by f = 0 and
(f, G) one associates the Berglund -- Hubsch -- Henningson (BHH) dual pair (ef ,eG).
ef = 0 in weighted projective spaces by the groups G and eG respectively. There were
found a number of symmetries of invariants corresponding to BHH dual pairs. For
example, in [9] and [1], there was discovered a duality of certain elliptic genera of
∗Partially supported by DFG. The work of the second author (Sections 3, 5, and 6) was sup-
ported by the grant 16-11-10018 of the Russian Science Foundation. Keywords: group action,
invertible polynomial, mirror symmetry, Berglund -- Hubsch -- Henningson duality, equivariant Eu-
ler characteristic, Saito duality. Mathematical Subject Classification -- MSC2010: 14J33, 57R18,
32S55, 19A22
1
dual pairs. In [3], there were constructed isomorphisms between certain Chen -- Ruan
orbifold cohomology groups of dual pairs of Calabi -- Yau type. There were also found
symmetries between invariants related to the Milnor fibres of f and ef . In [4], it was
shown that the reduced orbifold Euler characteristics of the Milnor fibres of dual
pairs coincide up to sign. In [6], it was shown that the orbifold E-functions (gen-
erating functions for the exponents of the monodromy actions on orbifold versions
of the mixed Hodge structures on the Milnor fibres) of dual pairs possess a certain
symmetry property. In [5], there was constructed a duality between the Burnside
rings of a finite abelian group and of its group of characters which was interpreted as
the Saito duality in some cases. For the groups of diagonal symmetries of invertible
polynomials this duality is related to the BHH duality. In [5], it was shown that the
reduced equivariant Euler characteristics of the Milnor fibres of dual invertible poly-
nomials with the actions of their groups of diagonal symmetries defined as elements
of the Burnside rings of the groups are Saito dual to each other up to sign.
In [12] and [15], there were presented many Calabi -- Yau threefolds obtained as
crepant resolutions of quotient varieties of smooth quintic threefolds by non-abelian
symmetry groups. The data computed for them indicates that there might be mirror
dual pairs. The majority of these threefolds are defined by invertible polynomials
with the symmetry groups generated by subgroups of the groups of diagonal sym-
metries and subgroups of the group S5 of permutations of variables.
A. Takahashi (personal communication) suggested a conjectural method to find
of the group Gf of the diagonal symmetries of f and a subgroup S ⊂ Sn of the
mirror symmetric pairs. The method associates to a pair (f,bG) with a non-abelian
group bG of a certain type (namely, a semi-direct product G ⋊ S of a subgroup G
group of permutations of variables) a dual pair (ef ,ebG). An analysis of the data in
[15] shows that in some cases the method detects pairs which can be considered as
mirror symmetric ones, whereas in some other cases it fails.
Here we generalize the Saito duality between Burnside rings to a case of non-
abelian groups and prove a "non-abelian" generalization of the statement from [5].
Namely, we compute the equivariant Euler characteristic of the Milnor fibre of an
invertible polynomial with the action of the semidirect product of the group Gf of
the diagonal symmetries of f and of a subgroup S of the group Sn of permuta-
tions of variables as an element of a version A⋊(Gf ⋊ S) of the Burnside ring. We
define a non-abelian version of the Saito duality as a group isomorphism between
A⋊(Gf ⋊ S) and A⋊((Gf )∗ ⋊ S) ((Gf )∗ = Hom (Gf , C∗) = G ef ) and compare the
reduced equivariant Euler characteristics of the Milnor fibres for Berglund -- Hubsch --
Henningson -- Takahashi dual pairs. We show that these reduced equivariant Euler
characteristics are up to sign Saito dual to each other only under a special condition
on the action of the subgroup of the permutation group called here PC ("parity
condition"). We try to analyze a relation of the PC-condition with the mirror sym-
metry. An inspection of [15, Table 5] shows that the pairs found on the basis of the
method of Takahashi (there are 13 of them with non-trivial groups S) might be con-
sidered as mirror symmetric ones (have symmetric pairs of Hodge numbers) if and
2
only if they satisfy PC. This indicates that the condition PC seems to be necessary
for the mirror symmetry of Berglund -- Hubsch -- Henningson -- Takahashi dual pairs.
The authors are grateful to A. Takahashi for explaining his ideas on non-abelian
mirror symmetry and to the referees of the paper for a number of useful suggestions.
2
Invertible polynomials and their symmetry groups
An invertible polynomial in n variables is a quasihomogeneous polynomial f with
the number of monomials equal to the number n of variables (that is
f (x1, . . . , xn) =
ai
nXi=1
nYj=1
xEij
j
,
where ai are non-zero complex numbers and Eij are non-negative integers) such that
the matrix E = (Eij) is non-degenerate and f has an isolated critical point at the
origin.
Remark 1 The condition det E 6= 0 is equivalent to the condition that the weights
q1, . . . , qn of the variables in the polynomial f are well defined (if one assumes the
quasidegree to be equal to 1). In fact they are defined by the equation
E · (q1, . . . , qn)T = (1, . . . , 1)T .
Without loss of generality one may assume that all the coefficients ai are equal to
1.
A classification of invertible polynomials is given in [10]. Each invertible polyno-
mial is the direct ("Sebastiani -- Thom") sum of atomic polynomials in different sets
of variables of the following types:
1) chains: xp1
2) loops: xp1
1 x2 + xp2
1 x2 + xp2
2 x3 + . . . + xpm−1
2 x3 + . . . + xpm−1
m−1 xm + xpm
m , m ≥ 1 ;
m−1 xm + xpm
m x1, m ≥ 2 .
The group of the diagonal symmetries of f is
Gf = {λ = (λ1, . . . , λn) ∈ (C∗)n : f (λ1x1, . . . , λnxn) = f (x1, . . . , xn)} ,
where C∗ = C \ {0} is the set of non-zero complex numbers. One can see that Gf
is an abelian group of order det E . The Milnor fibre Vf = {x ∈ Cn : f (x) = 1}
of the invertible polynomial f is a complex manifold of dimension n − 1 with the
natural action of the group Gf .
The Berglund -- Hubsch transpose of f is
nXi=1
nYj=1
xEji
j
.
ef (x1, . . . , xn) =
3
vanishing (i. e. being equal to 1) on the subgroup G.
the group G∗
f = Hom(Gf , C∗) of characters of Gf (see, e. g., [5, Proposition 2]).
For a subgroup G of Gf , the Berglund -- Hubsch -- Henningson (BHH) dual to the pair
f is the subgroup of characters of Gf
The group G ef of the diagonal symmetries of ef is in a canonical way isomorphic to
(f, G) is the pair (ef ,eG), where eG ⊂ G ef = G∗
Let the permutation group Sn act on the space Cn by permuting the variables.
If an invertible polynomial f is invariant with respect to a subgroup S ⊂ Sn, then it
is invariant with respect to the semi-direct product Gf ⋊ S (defined by the natural
action of S on Gf ). Here the operation on Gf ⋊ S is defined as follows. For
(λ, σ), (µ, τ ) ∈ Gf ⋊ S we define
(λ, σ) · (µ, τ ) := (λσ(µ), στ ) ,
where
σ(µ) := (σ(µ1), . . . , σ(µn)) = (µσ−1(1), . . . , µσ−1(n))
and the action of the product of σ, τ ∈ S on µ ∈ Gf is defined as
(στ )(µ) := (µτ −1σ−1(1), . . . , µτ −1σ−1(n)).
The semi-direct product Gf ⋊S acts on Cn in the following way. For (λ, σ) ∈ Gf ⋊S
and x = (x1, . . . , xn) we have
(λ, σ)x = (λ1xσ−1(1), . . . , λnxσ−1(n)).
The action of the group Gf ⋊ S can be restricted to the Milnor fibre Vf = {x ∈ Cn :
f (x) = 1} of the polynomial f .
Let G be a subgroup of Gf invariant with respect to the group S, i. e., σG = G
for any σ ∈ S. In this case the semidirect product G ⋊ S is defined and the BHH
Definition: The Berglund -- Hubsch -- Henningson -- Takahashi (BHHT) dual to the pair
dual subgroup eG is also invariant with respect to S.
(f, G ⋊ S) is the pair (ef ,eG ⋊ S).
The Burnside ring A(H) of a finite group H is the Grothendieck ring of finite
H-sets. This means that A(H) is the abelian group generated by the classes [(Z, H)]
of finite H-sets modulo the relations
1) if (Z, H) is isomorphic to (Z ′, H), i. e., if there exists a bijection between Z
and Z ′ preserving the H-action, then [(Z, H)] = [(Z ′, H)];
2) if [(Z1, H)] and [(Z2, H)] are finite H-sets, then [(Z1 ⊔ Z2, H)] = [(Z1, H)] +
[(Z2, H)].
The multiplication in A(H) is defined by the Cartesian product of the sets with
the natural (diagonal) H-action. As an abelian group, A(H) is freely generated by
the classes [H/K] of the quotient sets H/K for representatives K of the conjugacy
classes [K] of subgroups of H. For an H-space X and for a point x ∈ X the isotropy
4
subgroup of x is Hx := {g ∈ H : gx = x}. For a subgroup K ⊂ H the set of fixed
points of K (that is points x with Hx ⊃ K) is denoted by X K; the set of points
x ∈ X with the isotropy subgroup K is denoted by X (K), the set of points x ∈ X
with the isotropy subgroup conjugate to K is denoted by X ([K]). The equivariant
Euler characteristic of a topological H-space X was introduced in [13] as the element
of the Burnside ring A(H) defined by
χH(X) := X[K]∈Conjsub H
χ(X ([K])/H)[H/K] ,
(1)
where Conjsub H is the set of conjugacy classes of subgroups of H. The reduced
equivariant Euler characteristic χH(X) is χH (X) − χH(pt) = χH (X) − [H/H]. The
equivariant Euler characteristic is a universal additive topological invariant of va-
rieties or manifolds with H-actions: see, e. g., [7]. Therefore it determines other
additive topological invariants, in particular, the standard Euler characteristic, the
Euler characteristic of the quotient and the orbifold Euler characteristic. It does
not determine analytic or algebraic invariants, say, (orbifold) Hodge numbers.
H and IndG
If H is a subgroup of a finite group G, one has the reduction and the induction
operations RedG
H which convert G-spaces to H-spaces and H-spaces to
G-spaces respectively. The reduction RedG
HX of a G-space X is the same space
considered with the action of the subgroup. The induction IndG
HX of an H-space
X is the quotient space (G × X)/ ∼, where the equivalence relation ∼ is defined
by: (g1, x1) ∼ (g2, x2) if (and only if) there exists h ∈ H such that g2 = g1h,
x2 = h−1x1; the G-action on it is defined in the natural way. Applying the reduction
and the induction operations to finite G- and H-sets respectively, one gets the
reduction homomorphism RedG
H : A(G) → A(H) and the induction homomorphism
IndG
H[H/K] = [G/K]. The
reduction homomorphism is a ring homomorphism, whereas the induction one is a
homomorphism of abelian groups.
H : A(H) → A(G). For a subgroup K of H, one has IndG
For a finite abelian group H, let H ∗ = Hom(H, C∗) be its group of characters.
Just as for a subgroup of Gf above, for a subgroup K ⊂ H, the (BHH) dual subgroup
of H ∗ is
eK := {α ∈ H ∗ : α(g) = 1 for all g ∈ K} .
The equivariant Saito duality (see [5]) is the group homomorphism DH : A(H) →
equivariant Euler characteristics of the Milnor fibres of Berglund -- Hubsch dual in-
A(H ∗) defined by DH([H/K]) := [H ∗/eK]. In [5], it was shown that the reduced
vertible polynomials f and ef with the actions of the groups Gf and G ef respectively
are Saito dual to each other up to the sign (−1)n.
3 Non-abelian equivariant Saito duality
Let G be a finite abelian group and let S be a finite group with a homomorphism
ϕ : S → Aut G. These data determine the semi-direct product bG = G ⋊ S. Let
5
of points conjugate to H ⋊ T ⊂ G ⋊ S, where H and T are subgroups of G and
of S respectively such that, for σ ∈ T , the automorphism ϕ(σ) preserves H. (The
semidirect product structure on H ⋊ T is defined by the homomorphism ϕT : T →
A⋊(G ⋊ S) be the Grothendieck group of finite bG-sets with the isotropy subgroups
Aut H.) The group A⋊(G ⋊ S) is a subgroup of the Burnside ring A(bG) of the
group bG.
It is the free abelian group generated by the elements [G ⋊ S/H ⋊ T ]
corresponding to the conjugacy classes of the subgroups of the form H ⋊ T . An
element of A⋊(G ⋊ S) can be written in a unique way as
X[H⋊T ]∈Conjsub bG
aH⋊T [G ⋊ S/H ⋊ T ]
with integers aH⋊T .
Proposition 1 Subgroups H1 ⋊ T1 and H2 ⋊ T2 are conjugate in G ⋊ S if and only
if they are conjugate by an element σ ∈ S ⊂ bG, i. e. T2 = σ−1T1σ, H2 = ϕ(σ)H1.
Proof. Each element of G ⋊ S is the pair of an element of G and an element of S.
To prove the statement, we have to show that, if the conjugation by an element of
G ⊂ G ⋊ S sends a subgroup H ⋊ T to a subgroup of the form K ⋊ T , then K = H.
We have
g−1(h, σ)g =(cid:0)(cid:0)g−1ϕ(σ(g)(cid:1) h, σ(cid:1) .
The set (g−1ϕ(σ(g)) H is a coset of the subgroup H. Thus it is a subgroup K of G
if and only if it coincides with H.
✷
Let G∗ = Hom (G, C∗) be the group of characters on G. One has G∗∗ ∼= G
(canonically). The homomorphism ϕ : S → Aut G induces a natural homomorphism
Proposition 2 Subgroups H1 ⋊ T1 and H2 ⋊ T2 are conjugate in G ⋊ S if and only
G∗ ⋊ S be the semidirect product defined by the homomorphism ϕ∗. One can
see that, if ϕ(σ) preserves a subgroup H ⊂ G, then ϕ∗(σ) preserves the subgroup
ϕ∗ : S → Aut G∗: hϕ∗(σ)α, gi = hα, ϕ(σ−1)gi, where hα, gi := α(g). Let bG∗ :=
eH ⊂ G∗. Thus for a semidirect product H ⋊ T ⊂ G ⋊ S one has the semidirect
product eH ⋊ T ⊂ G∗ ⋊ S.
if the subgroups fH1 ⋊ T1 and fH2 ⋊ T2 are conjugate in G∗ ⋊ S.
H2 ⋊ T2 are conjugate by an element σ ∈ S, then the subgroups fH1 ⋊ T1 and fH2 ⋊ T2
group bG = G ⋊ S is the group homomorphism D⋊
Definition: The ("non-abelian") equivariant Saito duality corresponding to the
: A⋊(G ⋊ S) → A⋊(G∗ ⋊ S)
Proof. This is a direct consequence of Proposition 1: if the subgroups H1 ⋊ T1 and
are conjugate by this element as well.
defined (on the generators) by
✷
bG
D⋊
bG
([G ⋊ S/H ⋊ T ]) = [G∗ ⋊ S/eH ⋊ T ] .
6
By Proposition 2, the homomorphism D⋊
bG
is an isomorphism of the groups A⋊(G ⋊ S) and A⋊(G∗ ⋊ S) and D⋊
is well-defined. One can see that D⋊
bG
= id
cG∗D⋊
bG
(cG∗ = G∗ ⋊ S) .
For a subgroup S′ ⊂ S one has the natural homomorphism Ind G⋊S
G⋊S ′ : A⋊(G ⋊
S′) → A⋊(G⋊S) sending the generator [G ⋊ S′/H ⋊ T ] to the generator [G ⋊ S/H ⋊ T ].
This homomorphism commutes with the Saito duality, i. e the diagram
A⋊(G ⋊ S′)
D⋊
−−−−→ A⋊(G∗ ⋊ S′)
G⋊S ′
A⋊(G ⋊ S)
D⋊
G⋊S−−−→ A⋊(G∗ ⋊ S)
G⋊S ′
yInd G⋊S
⋊S
⋊S ′
G∗
yInd G∗
is commutative.
4 Equivariant Euler characteristic of the Milnor
fibre
Let f be an invertible polynomial in n variables, let Gf be the group of the diagonal
symmetries of f , and let S be a subgroup of Sn preserving f .
An atomic polynomial of chain type is not preserved by a permutation of variables
different from the identical one. An atomic polynomial of loop type may have non-
trivial symmetries by permutations of variables. This may happen in two ways.
First, a loop
xp1
1 x2 + xp2
2 x3 + . . . + xpm−1
m−1 xm + xpm
m x1
(2)
can be such that its length m is divisible by an integer ℓ, ℓ < m, (that is m = kℓ with
k > 1) and the sequence p1, . . . , pm of its exponents is ℓ-periodic, i. e. pi+ℓ = pi for
i = 1, . . . , m. Here and below the indices (i and i + ℓ in this case) are taken modulo
m. A symmetry sends the variable xi to the variable xi+sℓ for some s = 1, . . . , k − 1.
Symmetries of this sort will be called rotations. Besides that one may have a flip of
a loop (2) which sends the variable xi to the variable xr−i for some r = 1, 2, . . . , m
(again the indices are considered modulo m). A permutation of variables of this
sort preserves the loop if and only if all the exponents pi are equal to 1. In this case
either (2) is not an invertible polynomial (since it has a non-isolated critical point
at the origin) or it has a non-degenerate critical point (i. e. of type A1) at the origin.
Therefore we will exclude this type of symmetries of loops from consideration.
The invertible polynomial f is the direct (Sebastiani -- Thom) sum of atomic poly-
nomials (blocks). In these terms the action of its symmetry group S ⊂ Sn can be
described in the following way. There are some blocks which are permuted by the
group S (all permuted blocks are isomorphic). This means that, if a block goes to
itself under the action of an element σ ∈ S, then σ acts on the block identically.
7
We shall say that these blocks are of the first type. All chain blocks are of the first
type. Other blocks will be said to be of the second type. All of them are loops and
if σ ∈ S sends a block to itself, then it acts on the block (a loop) by a rotation.
as well.
One can see that the dual polynomial ef is invariant with respect to the group S
To have the possibility to discuss a non-abelian equivariant Saito duality for dual
invertible polynomials, one has to know that the equivariant Euler characteristic of
the Milnor fibre Vf of a polynomial f with the Gf ⋊S-action belongs to the subgroup
A⋊(Gf ⋊ S) ⊂ A(Gf ⋊ S). This will be proved in Section 6 with the use of the
following statement.
for a conjugacy class [ T ] ∈ Conjsub (Gf ⋊ S), one has
Proposition 3 If,
((C∗)n)([ T ]) 6= ∅, then the class [ T ] contains a representative of the form {e} × T .
Moreover, subgroups {e} × T1 and {e} × T2 are conjugate in Gf ⋊ S if and only if
T1 and T2 are conjugate in S.
Proof. Let T = π( T ) where T is a representative of the conjugacy class [ T ] and
π : Gf ⋊ S → S is the quotient map. Since the action of Gf on (C∗)n is free and
((C∗)n)( T ) 6= ∅, for any σ ∈ T there exists a unique λ = λ(σ) ∈ Gf such that
(λ(σ), σ) ∈ T . (If λ′x = λ′′x = x for x ∈ (C∗)n, then (λ′
nxσ−1(n)) =
nxσ−1(n)), what is impossible for λ′ 6= λ′′ since the action of Gf on
(λ′′
(C∗)n is free.) One has (λ(δ), δ) · (λ(σ), σ) = (λ(δ) · δ(λ(σ)), δσ) and therefore
1xσ−1(1), . . . , λ′′
1xσ−1(1), . . . , λ′
λ(δσ) = λ(δ)δ(λ(σ)) .
(3)
Let x ∈ ((C∗)n)( T ), i. e. (λ(σ), σ)x = x for all σ ∈ T . We shall show that there exists
a µ ∈ Gf such that
µ · y ∈ ((C∗)n) T for all y = (y1, . . . , yn) ∈ ((C∗)n)T .
Here y ∈ ((C∗)n)T means that yσ−1(i) = yi, i = 1, . . . , n, for all σ ∈ T .
The condition µ · y ∈ ((C∗)n) T , i. e. (λ(σ), σ)µ · y = µ · y, means that
λ(σ)σ(µ) = µ .
(4)
(5)
This will imply that ((C∗)n)(µ−1 T µ) is contained in ((C∗)n){e}×T and, in particular,
µ · x ∈ ((C∗)n)({e}×T ), i. e. {e} × T ∈ [ T ].
It is sufficient to prove the existence of µ for a set of blocks from the same T -
orbit. The action of the group T on blocks of the polynomial f was described above.
Each element of T sends a block of any type to an isomorphic block. Moreover, if a
block is of loop type with a rotation (i. e. there are some elements of T which rotate
the block), then any element of T sends it to an isomorphic block with a rotation.
According to the description above, an orbit of T consists either of blocks which are
permuted (blocks of the first type) or of blocks (of loop type) which are permuted
with a rotation (blocks of the second type). Let us consider these two cases.
8
Case 1. Suppose that the orbit consists of blocks Bα, α ∈ A, of the first type.
Here A is a certain indexing set. The group G⊞Bα of the diagonal symmetries of
the direct sum of these blocks is the direct sum of the groups GBα of symmetries of
the block Bα (all of them are isomorphic). Let us denote an element λ ∈ G⊞Bα by
{λα} with λα ∈ GBα. Let (C∗)⊞Bα be the torus corresponding to the variables of
the blocks Bα, α ∈ A. We shall also write points y ∈ (C∗)⊞Bα as {y
}. Let us fix
α0 ∈ A. A point y ∈ (C∗)⊞Bα invariant with respect to the T -action is determined
by its part y
. The condition (5) can be written as
α
α0
for all α. For α = α0 we have
Thus we can take µ
= 1,
α0
λα(σ)µ
σ−1(α)
= µ
α
λα0(σ)µ
σ−1(α0)
= µ
α0
.
µ
σ−1(α0)
= λα0(σ)−1.
(6)
(7)
(8)
particular case of (3).
We have to check (6) for arbitrary α = δ(α0). Substituting µ from (8) we get
λδ(α0)(σ) ·(cid:0)λα0(δσ)(cid:1)−1 = (cid:0)λα0(δ)(cid:1)−1, i. e. λα0(δσ) = λα0(δ) · λδ(α0)(σ)·. This is a
Case 2. Suppose that the orbit consists of blocks Bα, α ∈ A, of the second type
(all of them are loops). The coordinates in the block Bα will be denoted by xα,i.
For a fixed α0 ∈ A, the subgroup Tα0 of T sending the block Bα0 to itself acts on
this block in the following way. We shall omit the index α0, i. e. we shall denote
xα0,i by xi for short. The block Bα0 is of the form
xpi
i xi+1,
kℓXi=1
(9)
where the index i is considered modulo kℓ and pi = pi+ℓ for all i = 1, . . . , kℓ. An
orbit of the action of the group Tα0 on the variables x1, . . . , xkℓ consists of all xi
with i congruent to each other modulo ℓ. An element y invariant with respect to
the action of Tα0 is determined by its coordinates y1, . . . , yℓ. Let us first define the
components µi of µ for i = 1, . . . , kℓ. Let σ ∈ Tα0 be the rotation i 7→ i + ℓ. Let
λi[s] := λi(σs) for i = 1, . . . , , kℓ and s = 0, 1, . . . , k − 1. A point (y1, . . . , ykℓ) is fixed
with respect to T ∩ π−1(Tα0) if
λi[s]yi−sℓ = yi
for all integers i taken modulo ℓ.
(10)
Let λi := λi[1], P := p1 · · · pℓ. The fact that λ ∈ GBα0
i λi+1 = 1 for
all i taken modulo ℓ. The condition (4) on µ is λi[s]µi−sℓyi = µiyi for i = 1, . . . , kℓ,
s = 1, . . . , k. It is sufficient to have λi[1]µi−ℓ = µi for i = 1, . . . , kℓ. This follows
from the equation
is equivalent to λpi
λi[s] = λi[1]λi−ℓ[1] · · · λi−(s−1)ℓ[1].
(11)
9
The condition that µ ∈ GBα0
means that
µp1
1 µ2 = µp2
2 µ3 = · · · = µpℓ
ℓ µℓ+1 = µp1
ℓ+1µℓ+2 = · · · = µpℓ
kℓµ1 = 1.
In particular, µℓ+1 = µ(−1)ℓP
1
. On the other hand, λℓ+1µ1 = µℓ+1. Thus
µ(−1)ℓP −1
1
= λℓ+1.
(12)
(13)
Therefore µ1 should be a root of degree ((−1)ℓP − 1) of λℓ+1. Let us define µ1 as
any fixed root of this type. The equations (12) (µpi
i µi+1 = 1) for i = 1, . . . , kℓ − 1
determine all the components µi of µ as powers of µ1. In particular, they give
kℓ = µ(−1)kℓ−1P k
µpℓ
1
.
One has to verify the last equation
µ1−(−1)kℓP k
1
= 1.
The conditions (10) imply that
(14)
(15)
λℓ+1 · · · λ(k−1)ℓ+1λ1 = 1, i. e. λℓ+1 = (λ2ℓ+1 · · · λ(k−1)ℓ+1λ1)−1.
(16)
The conditions λpi
i λi+1 = 1 (λ ∈ GBα0
) imply that
λ2ℓ+1 = λ(−1)ℓP
,
λ3ℓ+1 = λ(−1)2ℓP 2
ℓ+1
ℓ+1
,
...
...
...
λ(k−1)ℓ+1 = λ(−1)(k−2)ℓP k−2
λ1 = λ(−1)(k−1)ℓP k−1
ℓ+1
ℓ+1
,
.
Therefore we have
λ1+(−1)ℓP +(−1)2ℓP 2+···+(−1)(k−2)ℓP k−2+(−1)(k−1)ℓP k−1
ℓ+1
= 1.
(17)
Together with (13) this gives (15).
Just as in Case 1, we must have (6) and thus (7). This means that for an arbtrary
. The condition (6) for an arbitrary α
✷
α we shall define µ by µ
is obtained literally as in Case 1.
= λα0(σ)−1µ
σ−1(α0)
α0
5 Condition PC
Let f be an invertible polynomial invariant with respect to a subgroup S ⊂ Sn. In
bG ef (V ef ) ∈
Section 6, it will be shown that χ
A⋊(G ef ⋊ S)). If S = {e}, one has the equivariant Saito duality
bGf (Vf ) ∈ A⋊(Gf ⋊ S) (and similarly χ
bGf (Vf ) = (−1)nD⋊
χ
bG ef
bG ef (V ef ) .
χ
(18)
Let us show that Equation (18) does not hold in general for S 6= {e}.
10
Example 1 Let
f (x) = ef (x) = xm
1 + xm
2 + xm
3 + xm
4 , S = h(12)(34), (13)(24)i ∼= Z2 × Z2.
2, Z′′
The group Gf (∼= G ef ) is isomorphic to Z4
m. The isotropy subgroup of a point with
respect to the Gf ⋊ S-action on the Milnor fibre Vf is conjugate to Zr
m ⋊ T , where
T is one of the subgroups S, {e}, Z′
2, Z′′
2, and Z′′′
2 are
the cyclic subgroups of S of order 2), 0 ≤ r ≤ 3. Here r < 4, since the action
m on Vf is effective. We shall compute the coefficients of [Gf ⋊ S/Zr
of Z4
m ⋊ T ]
bGf (Vf ) with r = 0. Only these summands can be Saito dual to the summand
in χ
bGf (Vf ) is equal
−[G ef ⋊S/G ef ⋊S] in χ
to the Euler characteristic of the quotient space V ([{e}⋊T ])
/Gf ⋊ S (see Equation (1)
for the equivariant Euler characteristic).
bG ef (V ef ). The coefficient of [Gf ⋊S/{e} ⋊T ] in χ
2 of the group S (Z′
2, Z′′′
f
The isotropy subgroups conjugate to {e} ⋊ T can be met only for points from
Vf ∩(C∗)4. The points with the isotropy subgroup {e}⋊S are of the form (x, x, x, x).
There are m of them. The points with the isotropy subgroup S conjugate to {e} ⋊ S
m since µ−1 Sµ =
are obtained from these ones by the action of the group Gf
{e} ⋊S for some µ ∈ Gf . Thus there are m4 of them (m elements of Gf permute the
bGf (Vf )
m points described above). Therefore the coefficient of [Gf ⋊ S/{e} ⋊ S] in χ
is equal to 1.
∼= Z4
2 with Z′
The points with the isotropy subgroup {e} ⋊ Z′
2 = h(12)(34)i are of the
form (x, x, y, y) with x 6= y. The Euler characteristic of the space {x ∈ Vf ∩ (C∗)4 :
x1 = x2, x3 = x4} is equal to −m2. Therefore the Euler characteristic of the union of
the shifts of this set by the elements of the group Gf is equal to −m4 (m2 elements of
Gf leave this set invariant). The Euler characteristic of V ([{e}⋊Z′
2])
is obtained from
f
this one by subtracting the Euler characteristic of V ([{e}⋊S])
(equal to m4) and thus is
bGf (Vf ) is equal to
equal to −2m4. Therefore the coefficient of [Gf ⋊ S/{e} ⋊ Z′
2] in χ
2] and [Gf ⋊ S/{e} ⋊ Z′′′
−1. The same holds for the coefficients of [Gf ⋊ S/{e} ⋊ Z′′
2 ].
In the same way one can show that the coefficient of [Gf ⋊ S/{e} ⋊ {e}] is equal
f
to 1. Thus all these terms sum up to
[Gf ⋊ S/{e} ⋊ S] − [Gf ⋊ S/{e} ⋊ Z′
2] − [Gf ⋊ S/{e} ⋊ Z′′
2]
−[Gf ⋊ S/{e} ⋊ Z′′′
2 ] + [Gf ⋊ S/{e} ⋊ {e}].
The first term in this expression is Saito dual to [G ef ⋊ S/G ef ⋊ S] (though with
the non-expected sign), whereas the other terms do not have dual counterparts.
The reason for these terms not to vanish is the following one. For an invertible
polynomial f in n variables with the symmetry group Gf ⋊ S, the sign of the Euler
characteristic of the set (Vf ∩ (C∗)n)T (T ⊂ S) is (−1)dim(Cn)T −1. This follows, e. g.,
from the formula of [14, Theorem (7.1)] (see Equation (29) below).
In the example above dim(Cn)S = 1 is odd while dim(Cn)Z′
2 = 2 and dim(Cn){e} =
0 are even. In a vague way, one can say that if the latter dimension would be odd as
11
well, the Euler characteristic of V ([{e}⋊Z′
2])
would vanish (being equal to m4 − m4).
This gives a hint that the Saito duality for dual invertible polynomials can only hold
if the dimensions of the subspaces (Cn)T for all subgroups T ⊂ S have the same
parity.
f
Remark 2 We might present a simpler example with f (x) = xm
2 , S = h(12)i,
however, in this case the group S is not contained in SL(2, C) what is the usual
condition in mirror symmetry.
1 + xm
The example above and the discussion of it motivate the following condition on
the action of the group S.
Definition: We say that a subgroup S ⊂ Sn satisfies the parity condition ("PC"
for short) if for each subgroup T ⊂ S one has
where (Cn)T = {x ∈ Cn : σx = x for all σ ∈ T }.
dim(Cn)T ≡ n
mod 2 ,
Proposition 4 A subgroup S ⊂ Sn satisfying PC is contained in the alternating
group An ⊂ Sn.
Proof. Let σ be an element of S. The dimension of the subspace (Cn)hσi (hσi
is the (cyclic) subgroup generated by σ) is equal to the number of cycles in the
decomposition of the permutation σ into disjoint cycles. This yields the statement.
✷
Examples. 1. The proof of Proposition 4 implies that a cyclic subgroup of Sn
satisfies PC if and only if its generator (and therefore each element) is an even
permutation. In particular, the subgroup A3 ⊂ S3 satisfies PC.
2. The subgroup A4 ⊂ S4 does not satisfy PC since dim(C4)A4 = 1. This implies
that, for n ≥ 4, the subgroup An ⊂ Sn does not satisfy PC (since An contains the
subgroup A4 permuting the first four coordinates).
3. The group A4 contains the subgroup S = h(12)(34), (13)(24)i isomorphic to
Z2 × Z2. The space (C4)S is one-dimensional and therefore the subgroup S does not
satisfy PC. (This was used in the example above.)
4. The group h(12345), (12)(34)i ⊂ S5 coincides with A5 and therefore does not
satisfy PC. The group h(12345), (14)(23)i ⊂ A5 is isomorphic to the dihedral group
D10 and satisfies PC.
6 Non-abelian Saito duality for invertible polyno-
mials
Let f , ef and S be as in Section 4 and also let bGf = Gf ⋊ S, bG ef = G ef ⋊ S. We shall
first show that the equivariant Euler characteristic of the Milnor fibre Vf with the
Gf ⋊ S-action belongs to the subgroup A⋊(Gf ⋊ S) ⊂ A(Gf ⋊ S).
12
Proposition 5 One has χ
S)).
bGf (Vf ) ∈ A⋊(Gf ⋊ S) (and similarly χ
bG ef (V ef ) ∈ A⋊(G ef ⋊
The proof of Proposition 5 will be postponed. Now we are ready to state our
main result.
Theorem 1 If the subgroup S ⊂ Sn satisfies PC, then one has
χGf ⋊S(Vf ) = (−1)nD⋊
G ef ⋊SχG ef ⋊S(V ef ) .
(19)
For the proofs of Proposition 5 and Theorem 1 we consider a decomposition of
Cn into certain unions of tori.
I}, (C∗)I := {(x1, . . . , xn) ∈ Cn : xi
For a subset I ⊂ I0 = {1, 2, . . . , n}, let CI := {(x1, . . . , xn) ∈ Cn : xi = 0 for i /∈
6= 0 for i ∈ I, xi = 0 for i /∈ I}. One has
(C∗)I. Each torus (C∗)I is invariant with respect to the actions of the
⊂ G ef be the isotropy subgroups of these
groups Gf and G ef . Let GI
actions on (C∗)I. (The isotropy subgroups are the same for all points of (C∗)I.)
Cn =FI⊂I0
f ⊂ Gf and GI
ef
The group S acts on the set 2I0 of subsets of I0. For a subset I ⊂ I0, let
SI := {σ ∈ S : σI = I} be the isotropy subgroup of I for the action of S on 2I0.
One has SI = SI where I := I0 \ I.
One has the decomposition
Cn = GI∈2I0 /S GI∈I
(C∗)I! ,
where the unions are over the orbits I of the S-action on 2I0, and over the elements
I of the orbit, and therefore
Vf = GI∈2I0 /S GI∈I(cid:0)Vf ∩ (C∗)I(cid:1)! .
The subsetFI∈I(cid:0)Vf ∩ (C∗)I(cid:1) ⊂ Vf is (Gf ⋊ S)-invariant. Therefore
χGf ⋊S GI∈I(cid:0)Vf ∩ (C∗)I(cid:1)! .
χGf ⋊S(Vf ) = XI∈2I0 /S
It is easy to see that
χGf ⋊S GI∈I(cid:0)Vf ∩ (C∗)I(cid:1)! = Ind Gf ⋊S
Gf ⋊SI χGf ⋊SI(cid:0)Vf ∩ (C∗)I(cid:1) .
(20)
(21)
For I ⊂ I0, let f I := fCI ; for I ⊂ I0 and for a subgroup T ⊂ SI, let f I,T :=
f(CI )T . Here the set (CI)T of fixed points of T in the coordinate subspace CI consists
13
of the points whose coordinates are equal if and only if they can be sent one to the
other by an element of T . If f I has an isolated critical point at the origin, then f I,T
has an isolated critical point as well. For short we shall denote f I0,T by f T .
The polynomial f I = f(Cn)I has not more than I monomials. It has I mono-
mials if and only if the polynomial ef I has I monomials. We treat the case that f I
has less than I monomials in the following lemma.
Lemma 1 With the notations above, let f I have less than I monomials. Then
χGf ⋊SI(cid:0)Vf ∩ (C∗)I(cid:1) = 0 .
Proof. We shall construct a free C∗-action on (C∗)I which preserves f(C∗)I and
commutes with the S-action. The existence of such an action implies the statement
of Lemma 1. One can see that f I is the Sebastiani -- Thom sum of some chains, some
loops and some polynomials of the form
xp1
i1 xi2 + xp2
i2 xi3 + . . . + xpm−1
im−1 xim
(22)
(in different sets of variables). The group SI permutes isomorphic blocks and (pos-
sibly) rotates loops (and also permutes variables which do not participate in f I).
Moreover, either there are some variables (say, xj1, . . . , xjℓ, ℓ > 0) which do not par-
ticipate in f I or there are some blocks of the form (22). In the first case let λ ∈ C∗
act on (C∗)I by multiplying all the variables xj1, . . . , xjℓ by λ and keeping all the
other variables fixed. In the second case one may have several blocks isomorphic
to (22) permuted by the group SI. Let q = (q1, . . . , qm) ∈ Zm \ {0} be such that
qir pi + qir+1 = 0 for 1 ≤ r ≤ m − 1. (Such q exists since it is defined by (m − 1)
linear equations with respect to m variables.) The action of C∗ on the variables xi1,
. . . , xim defined by
λ ∗ (xi1, . . . , xim) = (λq1xi1, . . . , λqmxim)
(and keeping all the other variables fixed) preserves f I. If we define its action on
the other m-tuples of variables obtained from these ones by the action of SI in the
same way, we get a C∗-action which preserves f I and commutes with SI.
✷
Proof of Proposition 5. According to Proposition 3 one has
χGf ⋊S((Vf ∩ (C∗)n)([{e}⋊T ])) ∈ A⋊(Gf ⋊ S) . (23)
χGf ⋊S(Vf ∩ (C∗)n) = X[T ]∈Conjsub S
Let I ⊂ I0 be a proper subset. If f I has less than I monomials then χGf ⋊SI(cid:0)Vf ∩ (C∗)I(cid:1) =
0 according to Lemma 1. Otherwise f I has I monomials. In this case f I is an
invertible polynomial in the variables xi with i ∈ I. Proposition 3 applied to f I
implies
χGf I ⋊SI
(Vf I ∩ (C∗)I) = X[T ]∈Conjsub SI
14
χGf I ⋊SI
((Vf I ∩ (C∗)I)([{e}⋊T ])) .
(24)
The last sum lies in A⋊(Gf I ⋊ S) ⊂ A⋊(Gf ⋊ S). Therefore, Equations (20), (21),
(23), and (24) imply the statement.
✷
For the proof of Theorem 1 we need two lemmas.
Lemma 2 Under the imposed conditions one has
χGf ⋊S (Vf ∩ (C∗)n) = (−1)n−1 [Gf ⋊ S/{e} × S]
= (−1)n−1D⋊
G ef ⋊ShG ef ⋊ S/G ef ⋊ Si .
Lemma 3 Under the imposed conditions one has, for the orbit I of a non-empty
proper subset J ⊂ I0,
χGf ⋊S GI∈I(cid:0)Vf ∩ (C∗)I(cid:1)! = (−1)nD⋊
(25) with f and ef interchanged).
Lemma 2 will follow from the following two lemmas.
G ef ⋊SχG ef ⋊S GI∈I(cid:16)V ef ∩ (C∗)I(cid:17)! .
Proof of Theorem 1. Theorem 1 follows from Lemma 2 and Lemma 3 (together with
✷
Lemma 4 Under the imposed conditions one has
χGf ⋊S(cid:16)Vf ∩ ((C∗)n)([{e}⋊S])(cid:17) = (−1)n−1 [Gf ⋊ S/{e} ⋊ S] .
Lemma 5 Under the imposed conditions one has, for a proper subgroup T of S,
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
χGf ⋊S(cid:16)Vf ∩ ((C∗)n)([{e}⋊T ])(cid:17) = 0 .
Proof of Lemma 4. For short, let X := Vf ∩ (C∗)n. By Equation (23) it suffices to
compute χGf ⋊S(X ([{e}⋊T ])) for a subgroup T of S. For T = S we have
X ([{e}⋊S]) = Ind Gf ⋊S
NGf ⋊S ({e}⋊S)X S ,
where X S = X (S) is considered as an NGf ⋊S({e} ⋊ S)-space. (Remember that the
operation Ind was defined for spaces as well.) The normalizer NGf ⋊S({e} ⋊ S) is
the semidirect (in fact direct) product GS
f ⊂ Gf is the subgroup of
Gf consisting of the elements g on which S acts trivially, i. e. ϕ(σ)g = g for all
σ ∈ S. This means that the subgroup GS
f consists of the elements (λ1, . . . , λn) ∈ Gf
such that λi = λj for i and j in the same S-orbit. Therefore GS
f coincides with the
symmetry group Gf S of the function f S which is again an invertible polynomial.
Since GS
f acts freely on X S and S acts trivially on it, one has
f ⋊ S, where GS
χGS
f ⋊S(X S) = χ(cid:0)(cid:0)Vf S ∩ ((C∗)n)S(cid:1) /GS
f(cid:1) ·(cid:2)GS
f ⋊ S/{e} ⋊ S(cid:3) .
15
Let ES be the exponent matrix of the invertible polynomial f S. The formula of [14,
Theorem (7.1)] implies that
χ(cid:0)Vf S ∩ ((C∗)n)S(cid:1) = (−1)dim(Cn)S −1 · det ES = (−1)dim(Cn)S −1 · GS
f .
But the PC property of S implies
(−1)dim(Cn)S −1 = (−1)n−1.
Therefore
χ(cid:0)(cid:0)Vf S ∩ ((C∗)n)S(cid:1) /GS
f ⋊S(cid:16)(Vf ∩ (C∗)n){e}⋊S(cid:17) = (−1)n−1(cid:2)GS
f(cid:1) = (−1)n−1,
f ⋊ S/{e} ⋊ S(cid:3) .
χGS
This implies the statement.
(29)
✷
Proof of Lemma 5. We keep the notation X := Vf ∩ (C∗)n. We have
χGf ⋊S(cid:0)X ([{e}×T ])(cid:1) = Ind Gf ⋊S
NGf ⋊S ({e}×T )χNGf ⋊S ({e}×T )(cid:0)X (T )(cid:1) .
The normalizer of {e} × T in Gf ⋊ S coincides with Gf T ⋊ NS(T ). The group
Gf T ⋊ NS(T )/{e} × T acts freely on X (T ). Therefore
χGf T ⋊NS(T )(cid:0)X (T )(cid:1) = χ(cid:0)X (T )/(cid:0)Gf T ⋊ NS(T )/{e} × T(cid:1)(cid:1) ·(cid:2)Gf T ⋊NS(T )/{e} × T(cid:3)
=
T · χ(cid:0)X (T )(cid:1)
Gf T ⋊ NS(T )
·(cid:2)Gf T ⋊NS(T )/{e} × T(cid:3) .
Let us show that
(In particular, this holds if T is a maximal proper subgroup of S.) The equation
Assume that for all subgroups U such that T U S one has χ(cid:0)X (U )(cid:1) = 0.
χ(cid:0)X (U )(cid:1) = 0 implies that, for g ∈ Gf T , χ(cid:16)X (g−1U g)(cid:17) = 0 (since X (g−1U g) = gX (U )).
2 U g2) either coincide (if
Moreover, for g1, g2 ∈ Gf T , the spaces X (g−1
g−1
1 Ug1 = g−1
2 Ug2) or do not intersect.
1 U g1) and X (g−1
(30)
χ(cid:0)X (T )(cid:1) = 0 .
X (g−1U g).
(31)
One has
X T \ [g∈Gf T
Due to the assumption one has
X g−1Sg = X (T ) ∪ [U :T U S [g∈Gf T
X (g−1U g) = 0 .
χ [U :T U S [g∈Gf T
16
X g−1Sg(cid:17) = 0. For g1, g2 ∈ Gf T ,
2 ∈ Gf S . This implies that
1 Sg1 = g−1
g−1
2 Sg2 if and only if g1g−1
Therefore χ(X (T )) = 0 if and only if χ(cid:16)X T \Sg∈Gf T
X g−1Sg = χ(X T ) −
χX T \ [g∈Gf T
The same formula of [14, Theorem (7.1)] gives
Gf T
Gf S
χ(cid:0)X S(cid:1) .
χ(X T ) = (−1)dim(C)T −1Gf T , χ(X S) = (−1)dim(C)S −1Gf S .
The condition PC gives that signs in these equations are equal to (−1)n−1. Therefore
χX T \ [g∈Gf T
X g−1Sg = (−1)n−1(cid:18)Gf T −
This proves the statement.
Gf T
Gf S
Gf S (cid:19) = 0 .
✷
Now we shall proceed to the proof of Lemma 3. Let f I have I monomials. In
this case f I is an invertible polynomial in the variables xi with i ∈ I. If the action of
SI on CI satisfies PC (in this case the action of SI = SI on CI satisfies PC as well),
one can explicitly compute both sides of (26) (and in this way prove it) repeating
the arguments of the proof of Lemma 2 for I = I0. However, in general, the action
of SI on CI does not satisfy PC. Nevertheless for any subgroup T ⊂ SI, one has
dim(CI)T − dim(CI)SI
≡ dim(CI)T − dim(CI)SI
mod 2 .
(32)
We shall consider the poset of subgroups T of SI. It is represented by a graph
which is called the Hasse diagram. We colour this graph by the parities of the
codimensions of (CI)T in CI. We call this graph the coloured Hasse diagram of SI
and denote it by ΓI. Lemma 3 will then follow from the following lemma.
Lemma 6 Under the imposed conditions one has, for a non-empty proper subset
I ⊂ I0 such that f I has I monomials,
χGf I ⋊SI(cid:0)Vf I ∩ (C∗)I(cid:1) = X[T ]∈Conjsub SI
a[T ](cid:2)Gf I ⋊ SI/{e} ⋊ T(cid:3)
(33)
for some coefficients a[T ], which depend only on the coloured Hasse diagram ΓI.
Proof of Lemma 3. Consider the function f I. If f I has less than I monomials,
then Lemma 1 implies that χGf ⋊SI(cid:0)Vf ∩ (C∗)I(cid:1) = 0. Otherwise, Lemma 6 implies
the following equation for the orbit I of the subset I
χGf ⋊S GJ∈I
Vf ∩ (C∗)J! = X[T ]∈Conjsub SI
a[T ](cid:2)Gf ⋊ S/GI
f ⋊ T(cid:3) .
(34)
17
By Lemma 6, the coefficients a[T ] depend only on the coloured Hasse diagram ΓI.
But ΓI = ΓI, since the poset of subgroups T of SI is the same for SI = SI and the
parities of the codimensions of (CI)T in CI and of (CI)T in CI are also the same due
to the condition PC: see Equation (32). This together with the fact that GI
ef
(see [5, Lemma 1]) implies (26).
✷
f
= fGI
Proof of Lemma 6. By Equation (24), it suffices to compute
χGf I ⋊SI(cid:16)Vf I ∩(cid:0)(C∗)I(cid:1)([{e}⋊T ])(cid:17)
for a subgroup T ⊂ S. But this is just the summand a[T ](cid:2)Gf I ⋊ SI/{e} ⋊ T(cid:3) in
(33). For T = SI this summand is computed in the same way as the corresponding
summand for I = I0 above and thus is equal to
(−1)dim(CI )SI
−1(cid:2)Gf I ⋊ SI/{e} ⋊ SI(cid:3) .
T
·
18
X (g−1U g)
I
(Pay attention that we do not substitute (−1)dim(CI )SI
−1 by (−1)dim(CI )−1 because,
in general, the action of SI on CI does not satisfy PC.) We shall show that, for
For short, let XI := Vf I ∩ (C∗)I. Assume that for all subgroups U such that
multiple of Gf I,T with the factor depending only on the coloured Hasse diagram
ΓI.
Gf I,T with the factor depending only on the coloured Hasse diagram ΓI. As above
we have
contains Gf I,T /Gf I,U different homeomorphic spaces. Therefore
the Euler characteristic of it is a multiple of Gf I,T . Using an analogue of Equa-
a proper subgroup T of SI, the Euler characteristic χ(cid:16)Vf I ∩(cid:0)C∗)I(cid:1)([{e}⋊T ])(cid:17) is a
I (cid:17) is a multiple of Gf I,U . The union
T U S the Euler characteristic χ(cid:16)X (U )
Sg∈Gf I,T
(cid:17) is a multiple of
tion (31), it is sufficient to show that χ(cid:16)X T
I \Sg∈Gf I,T
= χ(X T
χ(cid:16)X SI
I (cid:17) ,
=(cid:16)(−1)dim(CI )T −1 − (−1)dim(CI )SI
χ(cid:16)X (T )
I (cid:17)
χX T
I \ [g∈Gf I,T
χX T
I \ [g∈Gf I,T
i. e. it is a multiple of Gf I,T with the factor (equal either to 0 or to ±2) only
depending on the coloured Hasse diagram ΓI. Now
χ(X T
I ) = (−1)dim(CI )T −1Gf I,T , χ(X SI
−1(cid:17) · Gf I,T ,
a[T ] = χ(cid:16)X (T )
I /Gf I,T ⋊ NSI (T )(cid:17) =
I ) = (−1)dim(CI )SI
−1Gf I,SI . Therefore
NSI (T )
Gf I,T
I ) −
Gf I,T
Gf I,SI
X g−1Sg
I
X g−1SI g
I
X g−1SI g
I
which shows that the coefficients a[T ] only depend on the coloured Hasse diagram
ΓI.
✷
7 Examples of BHHT dual pairs with and without
PC
In [15], one has a list of some Calabi -- Yau threefolds defined in CP4 by homogeneous
polynomials of degree 5 with actions of certain (in general non-abelian) finite groups
with the pairs of orbifold Hodge -- Deligne numbers (h1,1, h2,1) (and the orbifold Euler
characteristics equal to 2(h1,1 − h2,1)). These pairs are equal to the Hodge numbers
of the crepant resolutions of the corresponding threefolds. The majority of these
threefolds are defined by invertible polynomials f and by groups of the form G ⋊ S,
where G ⊂ Gf , S ⊂ Sn.
In [11], the corresponding computations were made for the same polynomials and
the liftings of the corresponding groups to the so-called Landau -- Ginzburg orbifolds,
i. e. to the quantum cohomology groups in terms of [8]. The corresponding Hodge --
Deligne numbers (h1,1, h2,1) appeared to be symmetric to those for the corresponding
Calabi -- Yau threefolds in [15]. The table from [15] is reproduced in [11]: Table 1
therein. We shall use it for reference since it is more convenient:
in this table
the examples are numbered. In the course of a thorough analysis of the table we
have found that (up to possible renumbering of the variables) it contains 13 pairs
of BHHT dual invertible polynomials with non-abelian symmetry groups. They
are listed below in Table 1. (The pairs 21 ↔ 58 and 11 ↔ 43 were detected by
Takahashi.)
We use the following notations (partially taken from [15]). The numbers of the
examples (the first column) correspond to their numbering in [11, Table 1]. The
names of the polynomials f refer to:
X1 :
X14 :
X15 :
2 + x5
x5
1 + x5
x4
1x2 + x4
x4
1x2 + x4
3 + x5
2x1 + x4
2x3 + x4
4 + x5
5 ;
3x4 + x4
3x4 + x4
4x3 + x5
5 ;
4x5 + x4
5x1 .
These polynomials are self-dual, i. e. ef = f (up to a permutation of the variables in
the latter case). Elements of the group Gf (generators of the subgroups G in the
Table) are denoted by 1
m(a1, . . . , a5) with integers ai which is a short notation for
the operator
diag(cid:18)exp(cid:18)2πa1i
m (cid:19) , . . . ,(cid:18)2πa5i
m (cid:19)(cid:19) .
The element J is the exponential grading operator J = 1
by the monodromy transformation of the polynomial f ).
5(1, 1, 1, 1, 1) (represented
The first example in each pair was copied from [15] (or from [11]). The descrip-
tions of the dual ones differ from those in [15] by permutations of the coordinates
19
N
2
83
3
84
20
57
21
58
22
59
42
73
11
43
12
44
13
47
80
∗
82
∗
7
86
25
90
62
91
26
63
f
X1
X1
X1
X1
X1
X1
X14
X14
X14
X15
X1
X1
X1
X1
X14
G
S
5(1, 4, 4, 1, 0), J
5(0, 0, 1, 4, 0), J
5(1, 4, 2, 3, 0), J
J(cid:8) 1
5 (k1, . . . , k5) : 5P ki(cid:9)
J(cid:8) 1
5 (k1, . . . , k5) : 5P ki(cid:9)
1
5(1, 4, 1, 4, 0), J
5(0, 0, 1, 1, 3), 1
1
1
5(1, 4, 0, 0, 0), J
1
5(1, 1, 0, 0, 3), 1
1
5(1, 4, 2, 3, 0), J
1
5(0, 0, 1, 1, 3), 1
1
5(0, 1, 2, 3, 4), J
5(0, 1, 4, 4, 1), 1
1
1
3(1, 2, 0, 0, 0), J
1
15 (3, 3, 5, 10, 9), J
1
3(1, 2, 1, 2, 0), J
1
15 (13, 8, 2, 7, 0), J
1
3(1, 2, 1, 2, 0), J
1
15 (13, 8, 2, 7, 0), J
1
41 (1, −4, 16, 18, 10), J
J
1
5(0, 1, 4, 4, 1), 1
1
5(3, 1, 4, 2, 0), J
J(cid:8) 1
5 (k1, . . . , k5) : 5P ki(cid:9)
J(cid:8) 1
5 (k1, . . . , k5) : 5P ki(cid:9)
J(cid:8) 1
5 (k1, . . . , k5) : 5P ki(cid:9)
1
3(1, 2, 1, 2, 0), J
1
15 (13, 8, 2, 7, 0), J
5(0, 1, 2, 3, 4), J
5(0, 1, 2, 3, 4), J
Z2 : (12)(34)
Z3 : (123)
Z2 : (12)(34)
Z2 : (12)(34)
Z2 : (12)(34)
Z5 : (12345)
Z2 : (12)(34)
Z2 : (12)(34)
Z2 : (13)(24)
Z5 : (12345)
D10 : (12345), (25)(34)
Z2×Z2 : (12)(34), (13)(24)
A4 : (123), (12)(34)
A5 : (12345), (123)
Z2×Z2 : (12)(34), (13)(24)
(h1,1, h2,1)
(3, 59)
(59, 3)
(5, 49)
(49, 5)
(13, 17)
(17, 13)
(5, 33)
(33, 5)
(3, 19)
(19, 3)
(1, 5)
(5, 1)
(5, 33)
(33, 5)
(5, 25)
(25, 5)
(11, 19)
(19, 11)
(21, 1)
(1, 21)
(11, 3)
(3, 11)
(7, 35)
(41, 1)
(7, 27)
(29, 5)
(5, 13)
(15, 3)
(11, 15)
(21, 5)
Table 1: BHHT dual pairs
20
(this was made to have BHHT dual groups) and by presentations of the correspond-
ing groups G.
In particular, in Examples 44 and 47 we give other generators of
the groups to make explicit that the groups are the same as in Example 63. The
description of Example 73 is adapted to our notations: we have listed generators of
G explicitly.
In this table, the first 9 pairs satisfy PC and the last 4 pairs do not satisfy it:
see Section 5. There are added two more pairs: Examples 80 and 82 (satisfying
PC) plus their BHHT duals which are not in [15, Table 5]. The Hodge numbers
are easily computed in the way used in [15]. (In the case dual to Example 80, the
corresponding Calabi -- Yau threefold is the quotient of the smooth Klein quintic by
a free action of the cyclic group Z5.) One can see that in all the cases satisfying PC
the Hodge numbers of the dual pairs are symmetric to each other, whereas in all the
other cases (not satisfying PC) they are not. Moreover, almost all pairs of Hodge
numbers indicated in [15, Theorem 3.20] without mirror ones correspond to the
Calabi -- Yau threefolds in [15, Table 5] defined either by non-invertible polynomials
or by semi-direct products of groups not satisfying PC. This indicates that the
condition PC seems to be necessary for the mirror symmetry of BHHT dual pairs.
Remark 3 The pair (3, 11) of Hodge numbers of the threefold BHHT dual to Ex-
ample 82 shows that the list of pairs in [15, Theorem 3.20] is not complete (in
contradiction to [15, Remark 3.21]).
References
[1] P. Berglund, M. Henningson: Landau -- Ginzburg orbifolds, mirror symmetry
and the elliptic genus. Nuclear Phys. B 433 (1995), 311 -- 332.
[2] P. Berglund, T. Hubsch: A generalized construction of mirror manifolds. Nu-
clear Phys. B 393 (1993), 377 -- 391.
[3] A. Chiodo, Y.Ruan: LG/CY correspondence: the state space isomorphism.
Adv. Math. 227 (2011), no.6, 2157 -- 2188.
[4] W. Ebeling, S.M. Gusein-Zade: Orbifold Euler characteristics for dual invertible
polynomials. Mosc. Math. J. 12 (2012), no.1, 49 -- 54.
[5] W. Ebeling, S.M. Gusein-Zade: Saito duality between Burnside rings for in-
vertible polynomials. Bull. London Math. Soc. 44 (2012), no.4, 814 -- 822.
[6] W. Ebeling, S.M. Gusein-Zade, A. Takahashi: Orbifold E-functions of dual
invertible polynomials. J. Geom. Phys. 106 (2016), 184 -- 191.
[7] S.M. Gusein-Zade. Equivariant analogues of the Euler characteristic and Mac-
donald type formulas. Russian Math. Surveys 72 (2017), no.1, 1 -- 32.
21
[8] H. Fan, T.J. Jarvis, Y. Ruan: A mathematical theory of the gauged linear
sigma model. Geom. Topol. 22 (2018), no.1, 235 -- 303.
[9] T. Kawai, S.-K. Yang: Duality of orbifoldized elliptic genera. Quantum field
theory, integrable models and beyond (Kyoto, 1994). Progr. Theoret. Phys.
Suppl. No. 118 (1995), 277 -- 297.
[10] M. Kreuzer, H. Skarke: On the classification of quasihomogeneous functions.
Commun. Math. Phys. 150 (1992), 137 -- 147.
[11] D. Mukai: Nonabelian Landau -- Ginzburg orbifolds and Calabi -- Yau/Landau --
Ginzburg correspondence. Preprint arXiv:1704.04889.
[12] K. Oguiso, X. Yu: Automorphism groups of smooth quintic threefolds. Preprint
arXiv:1504.05011.
[13] T. tom Dieck: Transformation groups and representation theory. Lecture Notes
in Mathematics, Vol. 766, Springer, Berlin, 1979.
[14] A. N. Varchenko: Zeta-function of monodromy and Newton's diagram. Invent.
Math. 37 (1976), no.3, 253 -- 262.
[15] X. Yu: McKay correspondence and new Calabi -- Yau threefolds. Int. Math. Res.
Not. IMRN 2017, no.21, 6444 -- 6468.
Leibniz Universitat Hannover, Institut fur Algebraische Geometrie,
Postfach 6009, D-30060 Hannover, Germany
E-mail: [email protected]
Moscow State University, Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics,
Moscow, GSP-1, 119991, Russia
E-mail: [email protected]
22
|
1808.02417 | 1 | 1808 | 2018-08-07T15:22:53 | Constructible Sheaves | [
"math.AG"
] | This article contains a proof of the basic lemma. This lemma, discovered by Beilinson, yields a motivic proof of the Andreotti-Frankel theorem for affine varieties. Next, it is shown that the category of Cohomologically Constructible Sheaves (as it is referred to in the Riemann-Hilbert correspondence) coincides with the derived category of bounded complexes of constructible sheaves. It is also shown that higher direct images and the sheaf-Ext groups are effaceable in the category of constructible sheaves. | math.AG | math |
Constructible Sheaves
Madhav V. Nori
Abstract
This article contains a proof of the basic lemma, which yields a
motivic proof of the Andreotti Frankel theorem for affine varieties.
Next, it is shown that the triangulated category of "Cohomologically
Constructible Sheaves" (as it is referred to in the Riemann-Hilbert
correspondence) coincides with the derived category of bounded com-
plexes of constructible sheaves. It is also shown that higher direct
images and the sheaf-Ext groups are effaceable in the category of
constructible sheaves.
Introduction
The Andreotti-Frankel theorem asserts that a closed complex manifold X of
CN of dimension n has the homotopy type of a cell complex of dimension
at most n (see [AF] or [Mil]). This is achieved by constructing a Morse
function f : X → R with critical points of index at most n. Put
Xa = {x ∈ X : f (x) ≤ a}.
The cohomology of the pair (Xa, Xb) when b < a now enters the picture.
But the cohomology of these pairs do not inherit the rich structure (Galois
action , mixed Hodge structure, for instance) that the cohomology of X
carries when X is an algebraic variety. This is the reason for formulating
the basic lemma below.
Basic Lemma -- first form (A. Beilinson) Let k be a subfield of C.
Let W be Zariski closed in an affine variety X defined over k. Assume
dim(W ) < dim(X). Then there is a Zariski closed Z in X so that dim(Z) < n
with W ⊂ Z, and Hq(X, Z) = 0 whenever q 6= dim(X).
In the above lemma, Hq(X, Z) denotes the singular cohomology of the
pair (X(C), Z(C)). The cohomological version of the Andreotti-Frankel
theorem for affine varieties is of course an immediate consequence. Indeed
if X is affine of dimension n, from the above lemma, we deduce an in-
creasing sequence of Zariski closed sets Xi of dimension at most i so that
Hj(Xi, Xi−1) = 0 whenever j 6= i. Consequently, the j-th cohomology of
the complex D•, where Di = Hi(Xi, Xi−1) coincides with the j-th coho-
mology of X, which therefore vanishes whenever j > n. Furthermore D•
471
472
Madhav V. Nori
may be regarded as a complex of "motives". See also [Be1] and [Be2] for
such statements for mixed Hodge structures and Galois representations.
The proof given here of the basic lemma is geometric. It is not hard to
see that for our choice of Z in the basic lemma, (X(C), Z(C)) is in fact,
upto homotopy, a relative CW pair obtained by attaching cells of dimension
n. Furthermore, the same method gives a triangulation of real affine semi-
algebraic sets.
Our proof is valid only in characteristic zero. The proof of the inter-
mediate Proposition 1.3 is not valid in positive characteristic due to the
presence of wild ramification.
The only proof of the basic lemma in positive characteristic is that of
Beilinson ([Be2, Lemma 3.3]).
In fact, Beilinson's Lemma 3.3 is a vast
generalisation of the basic lemma to perverse sheaves, in the sense that it
produces plenty of perverse sheaves with at most one nonvanishing hyperco-
homology. With X and W as in the basic lemma, the proof of Lemma 3.3,
[Be2], as Beilinson explained to the author, yields Z in the following shape:
first enlargen W so that its complement V = X − W is affine and smooth of
pure dimension n, where n = dim(X). Next, embed X as a Zariski locally
closed set in projective space, and let H be a general hyperplane section of
X. Then Hq(X, W ∪ H) = 0 for q 6= n, and thus we may take Z = W ∪ H
in the basic lemma. Beilinson's Lemma 3.3 also includes a very general
cohomological (rather than homotopy theoretic) version of the "Lefschetz
hyperplane section theorem for complements": with V = X − W and H as
above, his result shows that Hq(V, V ∩ H) = 0 for q 6= n. However, Beilin-
son relies on M. Artin's sheaf-theoretic version of the Andreotti-Frankel
theorem, whereas we deduce M. Artin's theorem (in characteristic zero).
We now turn to constructible sheaves. A ring R will be fixed once and
for all. All sheaves considered are sheaves of left R-modules. A subfield k of
the complex numbers will remain fixed throughout the paper. All varieties
and morphisms considered are defined over this field k. By a "sheaf on
X" we mean a sheaf of R-modules on the set X(C) of C-rational points
equipped with the usual topology. A sheaf F on a variety X is said to be
weakly constructible if X is the disjoint union of a finite collection of locally
closed subschemes Yi so that the restrictions F Yi are all locally constant
sheaves. We also fix a full Abelian subcategory N of the category of all R-
modules so that every R-module M that is isomorphic to an object of N is
actually an object of N . We call F constructible if, in addition, all the stalks
of F are objects of N . We warn the reader that, in the literature (e.g., [KS,
Chapter VIII]), when constructible sheaves are discussed, N is the category
of all Noetherian modules. But we do not place such restrictions on N .
For constructible or weakly constructible sheaves F , the sheaf cohomol-
ogy Hq(X(C), F ) will be denoted simply by Hq(X, F ). To compute sheaf
Constructible Sheaves
473
cohomology, one takes a resolution K • of the given sheaf F and considers
the cohomology of the complex: Γ(X, K •). If K • is an injective, or even a
flasque, resolution (e.g., the Godement resolution), we get:
Hq(Γ(X, K •)) = Hq(X, F ).
Constructible sheaves are rarely flasque (if so, they are supported on a
finite set). Nevertheless, it is true that every constructible sheaf F on An
has a constructible resolution K • so that Hq(Γ(An, K •)) = Hq(An, F ) for
all q ≥ 0. Furthermore, we may assume that K q = 0 for all q > n. This
is a consequence of Theorem 1 below. The comparison theorem of Artin-
Grothendieck for etale cohomology (see [SGA4, Expose XI]) is the special
case of Theorem 2 for R = Z/nZ.
Theorem 1 Every constructible sheaf F on affine n-space An is a subsheaf
of a constructible G so that Hq(An, G) = 0 for all q > 0.
Theorem 2 For every constructible sheaf F on a variety X, there is a
monomorphism a : F → G with G constructible so that
Hq(X, a) : Hq(X, F ) → Hq(X, G)
is zero, for all q > 0.
Further effaceability results and their consequences are formulated be-
low. We shall denote by Sh(X) the category of sheaves of R-modules on X
and by C(X) the full subcategory of Sh(X) with Obj C(X)= constructible
sheaves. An additive functor T : C(X) → A, where A is an Abelian cate-
gory is effaceable, if for all objects F of C(X), there is a monomorphism
a : F → G in C(X) so that T a : T F → T G is the zero morphism.
Theorem 3
(a) Assume that R is commutative. For every weakly con-
structible sheaf P on X such that all the stalks of P are finitely gen-
erated projective modules, and for every q > 0, the functor
Extq
Sh(X)(P, ·)C(X)
is effaceable.
(b) Let R be a field, and let N be the category of all finite dimensional
vector spaces over R. Let F, G be constructible sheaves on X. Then
Extq
Sh(X)(F, G) is an isomorphism for all q ≥ 0.
C(X)(F, G) → Extq
474
Madhav V. Nori
Throughout the paper, Extq
A(F, G) denotes the Yoneda Ext group for
objects F and G of an Abelian category A. That Theorem 3(a) im-
plies Theorem 3(b) is the standard application of effaceability (see [Toh,
Prop. 2.2.1, page 141] ). Theorem 3(b) implies (see e.g., [Be2, Lemma 1.4])
that the derived category Db(C(X)), with R = k = C and N =finite
dimensional vector spaces, is equivalent to the triangulated category of
"cohomologically constructible sheaves" as it is referred to in the Riemann-
Hilbert correspondence.
In view of Beilinson's result ([Be2, Main theo-
rem 1.3, page 29]), one may re-state the Riemann-Hilbert correspondence
([Bo, Thm. 14.4]) as follows:
The derived category of bounded complexes of regular holonomic modules
is equivalent to the derived category of bounded complexes of constructible
sheaves of complex vector spaces.
Theorem 4 Assume that R is a field, and that N =all finite dimensional
vector spaces. Let f : X → Y be a morphism. Then the functors Rqf∗C(X)
are effaceable for all q > 0.
For the next theorem, assume that R is commutative and recall that
for sheaves F, G on X, we have the sheaf (of R-modules) Hom(F, G) on X
and the derived functors RqHom(F, ·) = Extq(F, ·).
Theorem 5 With R and N as in Theorem 4 above,
the functors
Extq(P, ·)C(X) are effaceable for all q > 0 and for all constructible sheaves
P on X.
The minimal hypotheses on R and N under which Theorems 3(b), 4
and 5 are valid remain unclear.
It is hoped that Theorems 1 -- 5, or at
least the method of proof, will help in constructing a category of motivic
sheaves. The reader will observe that the proofs of Theorems 1 and 2
require nothing more than the formal properties of the operations f ∗ and
Rqf∗ while Theorems 3, 4 and 5 require the internal Hom. That the
analogues of Theorems 1 -- 5 hold for Q l- sheaves (see [SGA4 1
2 , page 84]) is
immediate from the proofs given here.
The Noether normalisation lemma plays a major role in the proofs of
the sheaf-theoretic version of the basic lemma and Theorem 1. These proofs
appear in the first two sections. Some care has been taken to keep these sec-
tions self-contained and elementary (modulo the use of the Leray spectral
sequence and the proper base change theorem). For this purpose, direct
proofs of weak constructibility appear in these sections. In the third section,
the remaining theorems are essentially deduced from Theorem 1, Whitney
Constructible Sheaves
475
stratifications, devissage, and a reduction from [SGA4], [SGA4 1
2 ] (embed-
ding a sheaf F on X in i∗i∗F ⊕ j∗j ∗F when the images of i and j cover
X.
The first proof of Theorem 3(b), not the one given here, was found
with some aid in homological algebra from P. Deligne. The version of
Lemma 3.2(b) given here is based on a remark of V. Srinivas. The author
thanks both P. Deligne and V. Srinivas for useful discussions, and most of
all, A. Beilinson for taking the trouble to explain in detail the very first
consequences of his far-reaching Lemma 3.3.
1 The basic lemma for sheaves
A subfield k ⊂ C remains fixed throughout the paper. The phrases "sheaf
on X", "weakly constructible sheaf", etc. are as in the introduction. All
varieties and morphisms considered are defined over k. All sheaves consid-
ered are sheaves of R-modules. The cohomology group Hq(X(C), F ) will
always be denoted simply by Hq(X, F ). The lemma below evidently implies
the theorem of M. Artin : "Hq(X, F ) = 0 for q > dim(X), where X is
affine " (see [SGA4, Expose XIV, Corollary 3.2]) and the analogous results
of Hamm and Le (see [HL1] and [HL2]) for weakly constructible sheaves.
It is unclear whether or not the powerful relative version, due to M. Artin
([SGA4, Thm. 3.1, Expose XIV]), can also be obtained directly.
Beilinson's Lemma 3.3 of [Be2] covers (at least) the case F constructible,
R commutative Noetherian, N = all finitely generated modules,
in the
lemma below. Beilinson works in fields of all characteristics. Remark 1.1
below holds for his proof as well. It would be nice to get a proof of this spe-
cial case of Beilinson's very general lemma via Morse theory or the method
of pencils. This would have the double advantage of covering the general
case and proving the theorems of M. Artin and Andreotti-Frankel as well.
Basic Lemma -- second form (A. Beilinson) Let F be a weakly con-
structible sheaf on an affine variety X. Let n = dim(X). Then there is a
Zariski open U ⊂ X with the properties below, where j : U → X denotes
the inclusion, and F ′ = j!j ∗F ⊂ F .
(1) dim(Y ) < n, where Y is the complement of U in X,
(2) Hq(X, F ′) = 0 for q 6= n.
(3) There is a finite subset E ⊂ U (C) and an R-module isomorphism of
Hn(X, F ′) with ⊕{Fx : x ∈ E}.
476
Madhav V. Nori
Remark 1.1 With F on X as in the lemma above, let X ′ be the largest
Zariski open subset of X so that X ′ is smooth and F X ′ is locally constant.
The open U in the statement of the lemma depends only on X ′ and not on
F , as can be seen from the proof.
The proof given uses the Noether normalisation lemma twice. If in both
these places, one uses general linear projections instead, one sees that the
U in the lemma can be chosen to contain any given finite subset of X ′(C).
In particular, the U for which the lemma holds cover X, if F is locally
constant and if X is smooth.
Remark 1.2 The first form of the basic lemma, as given in the introduc-
tion, is an immediate consequence. If RX denotes the constant sheaf on X
and v : V → X is a Zariski open immersion with W as its complement,
then the sheaf cohomology Hq(X, F ), where F = v!v∗RX coincides with
the singular cohomology Hq(X, W ; R). So, the above lemma applied to F
and R = Z yields Y with dim(Y ) < n and Hq(X, Y ∪ W ) = 0 for q 6= n,
and Hn(X, Y ∪ W ) = 0 is a free Abelian group. The universal coefficient
theorem gives the same result for all R and for homology as well.
Proof (of the basic lemma (second form)) Because the direct image
of a locally constant sheaf under a covering projection is locally constant, it
follows easily that the direct image of a weakly constructible sheaf under a
finite morphism is weakly constructible. With X and F as in the lemma, by
Noether normalisation, we have a finite morphism π : X → An. Assuming
the lemma for the sheaf π∗F on An, we get a non-empty Zariski open
V ⊂ An with the desired properties.
Putting U = π−1V and denoting the inclusions of U in X and V in
An by j and v respectively, we see that π∗j!j ∗F = v!v∗π∗F . Consequently
Hq(X, j!j ∗F ) = Hq(An, v!v∗π∗F ), and by the very choice of V , the latter
vanishes for q 6= n. This proves part (2) of the lemma. Part (3) follows
because (π∗F )y is the direct sum of Fx taken over x ∈ π−1y.
It remains to prove the lemma for affine space. We will proceed by in-
duction on dimension. Given a weakly constructible sheaf F on An, choose
a nonconstant f in the co-ordinate ring of An so that the restriction F D(f )
is locally constant, where D(f ) and V(f ), are, as usual, {x f (x) 6= 0} and
{x f (x) = 0} in An respectively. Clearly, F may be replaced by its subsheaf
d!d∗F where d denotes the inclusion of D(f ) in An. Thus we will assume
that F V(f ) = 0. Next, after a linear change of variables, we may assume
that f is monic in the last variable. Denote by π : An → An−1 the pro-
jection (x1, x2, . . . , xn) 7→ (x1, x2, . . . , xn−1). The restriction πV(f ) is now
both finite and surjective. For y ∈ An−1(C), we consider the cohomology
groups Hq(π−1y, F π−1y). That this vanishes for q > 1 is standard (e.g.,
Constructible Sheaves
477
Remark 1.4 below). Because V(f ) ∩ π−1y is non-empty and the restric-
tion of F to this intersection is zero, we see that H0(π−1y, F π−1y) = 0 as
well. Because πV(f ) is a finite morphism, we may apply VPBC (Propo-
sition 1.3A below) to conclude that Rqπ∗F = 0 for all q 6= 1. For a non-
empty Zariski open U ′ ⊂ An−1 (that will be chosen later), let U = π−1U ′.
Let j ′ : U ′ → An−1 and j : U → An denote the given inclusions. Put
! j ′ ∗G and let F ′ = j!j ∗F . From Corollary 1.3C
G = R1π∗F . Let G′ = j ′
below, it follows that Rqπ∗F ′ = 0 for q 6= 1 and also that G′ → R1π∗F ′
is an isomorphism. From the Leray spectral sequence, we deduce that
Hq(An−1, G′) is isomorphic to Hq+1(An, F ′) for all q. Checking easily that
G is weakly constructible (see Remark 1.5), apply the basic lemma to the
pair (An−1, G) to get a non-empty U ′ ⊂ An−1 with the desired properties.
It follows that Hq(An, F ′) vanishes for all q 6= n. Finally, for part (3) of
the lemma, Hn(An, F ′) = Hn−1(An−1, G′) is isomorphic to a finite direct
sum of stalks Gy for y ∈ U ′(C) by the induction hypothesis. But each
such Gy = H1(π−1y, F π−1y) is isomorphic to a finite direct sum of stalks
of F π−1y from Remark 1.4 below. This completes the proof of the basic
lemma (modulo 1.3 -- 1.5).
(cid:3)
The statements 1.3A -- C below are for topological spaces and for sheaves
of Abelian groups.
In (H3) below, a topological space Z is "simply con-
nected" if every locally constant sheaf F on Z is a constant sheaf. This is
weaker than demanding that Z is path-connected and has trivial fundamen-
tal group. If f : L → M is a fiber bundle(this is so in all applications),
then (H2) holds locally on M .
Proposition 1.3A (Variation of proper base-change) Let f : L → M
be a proper continuous map, where L and M are second countable locally
compact Hausdorff spaces. Let L ⊂ L be open and let A be a sheaf on L.
Put f = f L. Assume (H1), (H2) and (H3) below.
(H1) There is a closed subset L1 ⊂ L so that f L1 is proper and AL − L1
is a locally constant sheaf.
(H2) For every point x ∈ L − L there is a neighbourhood U of x in L so
that f (U ) is open and f (U, U ∩ L) → f (U ) is a fiber bundle pair.
(H3) Every point m ∈ M has a fundamental system of simply connected
neighbourhoods.
Then Rqf∗Am → Hq(f −1m, Af −1m) is an isomorphism for all m ∈ M .
Corollary 1.3B With notation and assumptions as in Proposition 1.3A
above, let g : M ′ → M be continuous with M ′ second countable locally
478
Madhav V. Nori
compact Hausdorff. Put L′ = M ′ ×M L. Let f ′ : L′ → M ′ and g′ : L′ → L
denote the projections. Then g∗Rqf∗A → Rqf ′
∗g′∗A is an isomorphism.
Corollary 1.3C With notation and assumptions as in Proposition 1.3A
above, the homomorphism B⊗Rqf∗A → Rq(A⊗f ∗B) is an isomorphism for
all sheaves B on M of the type j!j∗(ZM ) for an open immersion j : V → M .
Proof (of Proposition 1.3A) Let Lm and Lm be the fibers over m ∈ M
in L and L respectively. Let j : L → L and jm : Lm → Lm denote the
inclusions. We have the spectral sequences:
Ep,q
2 = (Rpf ∗Rqj∗A)m ⇒ (Rp+qf∗A)m and
Ep,q
2 = Hp(Lm, Rq(jm)∗ALm) ⇒ Hp+q(Lm, ALm)
2
and a homomorphism from the first to the second. The second is the
Leray spectral sequence for the sheaf ALm and the inclusion jm. The
first is obtained by taking stalks at m of the Leray spectral sequence for
the composite L → L → M and the sheaf A. By the proper base-change
theorem, we see that the Ep,q
terms of the first spectral sequence coincide
with Hp(Lm, Rqj∗ALm). To prove the proposition, it suffices to check that
Rqj∗ALm → Rq(jm)∗(ALm) is an isomorphism. This arrow evidently
induces an isomorphism of stalks at x ∈ Lm. For the rest, one observes that
(H1), (H2) and (H3) imply (H4) below and then notes that for x ∈ Lm −Lm
the required isomorphism on stalks is a consequence. In any "geometric
situation" where M is triangulable, this is immediate. That (H4) and our
assumptions on the topology of L and M are adequate to draw the same
conclusion is left to the reader. This may be seen, for instance, by using
the Kunneth formula.
(H4): Every x ∈ L − L has a neighbourhood U ⊂ L with a continuous
h : (U, U ∩ L) → (V, W ) so that
(i) f (U ) is open in M ,
(ii) (h, f U ) induce a homeomorphism (U, U ∩ L) → (V, W ) × f (U ), and
(iii) there is a sheaf C on W and an isomorphism (hU ∩ L)∗C → AU ∩ L.
(cid:3)
Proof (of Corollary 1.3B) Once it is noted that the hypothesis (H4) in
the proof of Proposition 1.3A is stable under base-change, we see that stalks
of both sheaves at m′ ∈ M ′ are compatibly isomorphic to Hq(f −1m, Af −1m)
where g(m′) = m (this argument is standard, see e.g., the proof of the op-
eration Rqf! being stable under base change in [SGA4 1
2 , page 49]).
(cid:3)
Constructible Sheaves
479
Proof (of Corollary 1.3C) Denote by SqB the natural homomorphism
B ⊗ Rqf∗A → Rq(A ⊗ f ∗B). Let i : F → M be the the inclusion of the
complement of the given open subset V . Now SqZM is tautologically an
isomorphism. Putting g = i in Corollary 1.3B, we see that Sqi∗ZF is an
isomorphism. That Sqj!ZV is an isomorphism follows from the long exact
sequence of Sq obtained from the short exact sequence:
0
/i∗ZF
/ ZM
/j!ZV
/0.
(cid:3)
Remark 1.4 Consider a weakly constructible sheaf F on A1 whose re-
striction to the complement of a non-empty finite subset S ⊂ C is locally
constant. Let T be a tree embedded in C with S as its set of vertices, and
E as its set of edges. Let b(e) denote the barycenter of an edge e ∈ E. One
checks easily that
(a) Hq(A1, F ) → Hq(T, F T ) is an isomorphism, and
(b) the open covering {st(v) : v ∈ S} of T give a Leray covering for F T
(see e.g., [KS, Chapter VIII, Prop. 8.1.4.(ii), page 323]), for a more
general statement).
The Cech complex for this covering is the arrow ⊕s∈SFs → ⊕e∈EFb(e).
Thus, if F S = 0, then ⊕e∈EFb(e) → H1(T, F T ) is an isomorphism. This
gives part (3) of the basic lemma for the affine line.
Remark 1.5 Let π : X × A1 → X denote the projection. Let V ⊂ X × A1
be a Zariski closed subset so that πV is a finite surjective morphism. Let
A be a sheaf on X × A1 so that AV = 0 and the restriction of A to the
complement V is locally constant. We sketch briefly a proof that R1π∗A is
weakly constructible.
If πV is a finite etale morphism, then (X × A1, V ) → X is a fiber bun-
dle pair. Consequently R1π∗A is a locally constant sheaf. For the general
case, express X as a finite disjoint union of Zariski locally closed smooth
subvarieties Xi so that (π−1Xi ∩ V )red → Xi is a finite etale morphism.
By Corollary 1.3B, we see that R1π∗AXi maps isomorphically to the lo-
cally constant sheaf R1(πXi × A1)∗AXi × A1). This proves the weak
constructibility of R1π∗A.
Proposition 1.6 Let F be a constructible sheaf on a variety X. Then
Hq(X, F ) is an object of N for all q ≥ 0.
/
/
/
/
480
Madhav V. Nori
Proof Part (3) of the second form of the basic lemma, combined with
induction on dimension, proves the proposition when X is affine. The
general case now follows by induction on the number n of affine open sets
required to cover X, and the Mayer-Vietoris sequence (the same technique
is used in the proof of Proposition 3.6).
(cid:3)
2 The cohomology of affine space
This section begins with the proof of Theorem 1 as stated in the introduc-
tion. The conventions and notation are as in the previous section. The
proof is by induction on n, the inductive step relying crucially on a canon-
ical proof for the case n = 1 that works with parameters (Proposition 2.2
below). We then deduce the effaceability of cohomology for affine varieties
(Corollary 2.4).
We recall the statement of the theorem.
Theorem 1 Every constructible F on affine space is a subsheaf of a con-
structible G so that Hq(An, G) = 0 for all q > 0.
Proof We begin as in the proof of the basic lemma. Given a constructible
sheaf F on An, choose a nonconstant f in the co-ordinate ring of An so
that the restriction F D(f ) is locally constant, where D(f ) and V(f ), are,
as before, {x f (x) 6= 0} and {x f (x) = 0} in An. The projection π : An →
An−1 is, once again, arranged so that πV(f ) is a finite (and surjective)
morphism. Denote by j : D(f ) → An and i : V(f ) → An the inclusions.
From Proposition 2.2 below (with X = An−1 and A = j!j ∗F ) we see
that j!j ∗F is a subsheaf of a constructible H ′ on An so that Rqπ∗H ′ = 0
for all q ≥ 0. Taking push-outs, we obtain the commutative diagram of
exact sequences below:
0
0
j!j ∗F
F
i∗i∗F
mono
mono
iso
/ H ′
/ H
/ H ′′
0
/ 0.
We will say that a homorphism P → Q of sheaves on An is a π-isomorphism
if Rqπ∗P → Rqπ∗Q is an isomorphism for all q ≥ 0. We shall see that all
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
Constructible Sheaves
481
arrows in the commutative diagram below are π-isomorphisms.
π∗π∗H
H
π∗π∗H ′′
/ H ′′.
We have the implications:
Rqπ∗H ′ = 0 for all q ≥ 0
⇒ H → H ′′ is a π-isomorphism
⇒ π∗H → π∗H ′′ is an isomorphism
⇒ π∗π∗H → π∗π∗H ′′ is an isomorphism.
Next, because πV(f ) is a finite morphism, we see that H ′′ is constructible
and that Rqπ∗H ′′ vanishes for q > 0. For any sheaf K on An−1, Rqπ∗π∗K
vanishes for q > 0. Putting K = π∗H ′′, we deduce that π∗π∗H ′′ → H ′′ is a
π-isomorphism. We conclude that the only remaining arrow in the square
π∗π∗H → H is itself a π-isomorphism.
Now let π∗H ⊂ J with J a sheaf on An−1. Taking push-outs once again
yields the commutative diagram of exact sequences below:
0
0
π∗π∗H
π∗J
0
M
id.
/ H
/ G
/ M
/ 0.
The vertical arrows on the sides being π-isomorphisms,
π∗J → G is a π-isomorphism as well. It follows that
it follows that
Hq(An−1, J)
/ Hq(An, π∗J)
/ Hq(An, G)
are isomorphisms, for all q ≥ 0. By the induction hypothesis, we may
choose J satisfying Hq(An−1, J) = 0 for all q > 0 with J constructible.
We now have F ⊂ H ⊂ G with G constructible and Hq(An, G) = 0 for all
q > 0. The proof of the theorem is now complete modulo Proposition 2.2.
(cid:3)
Notation 2.1 We fix a variety X and work in the category of X-schemes.
The product Ar × X is denoted by Ar
X → X
and Π : A2
X → A2
X
denote the diagonal morphism.
X → X denote the given projections, and let ∆ : A1
X . Let pi : A2
X → A1
X , π : A1
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
482
Madhav V. Nori
For any sheaf A on A1
X , we define B on A2
X by the exact sequence:
0
/B
/p∗
1A
/∆∗A
/ 0.
Applying Rq(p2)∗ to the above exact sequence gives the arrow:
δ : A = (p2)∗∆∗A → C = R1(p2)∗B.
Proposition 2.2 Let V ⊂ A1
finite surjective morphism. Let A be a sheaf on A1
the restriction of A to the complement A1
δ : A → C as above, we have:
X be a Zariski closed subset so that πV is a
X so that AV = 0 and
X − V is locally constant. With
(1) the above δ : A → C is a monomorphism,
(2) Rqπ∗C = 0 for all q ≥ 0,
(3) C is weakly constructible. If A is constructible, so is C.
Proof Applying Rq(p1)∗ to the short exact sequence that defines B, we
see that Rq(p1)∗B = 0 for all q. From the Leray spectral sequence applied
to Π = π ◦ p1 we see that RqΠ∗B = 0 for all q.
X , A1
X ) ∪ p−1
Put Y = ∆(A1
1 V . Then BY = 0 and B is locally constant
on the complement of Y . Now p2Y is a finite surjective morphism. So,
substituting (A2
X , p2, B) for (L, M, f, A) in Proposition 1.3A, we get
Rq(p2)∗B = 0 for q 6= 1. By the Leray spectral sequence for Π = π ◦ p2
we deduce that Rqπ∗C = Rq+1Π∗B = 0. This proves part (2) of the
proposition. That C is weakly constructible follows from Remark 1.5. By
Proposition 1.3A and Remark 1.4, any stalk of C, being isomorphic to a
finite direct sum of stalks of B, is indeed an object of N if A is constructible.
This proves part (3). Finally, π∗Rqπ∗A → Rq(p2)∗p∗
1A is an isomorphism
by Corollary 1.3B, because V → X is a finite morphism. Furthermore,
V → X being surjective, the stalks of these sheaves vanish for q = 0, and
this proves part (1) of the proposition.
(cid:3)
Remark 2.3 From the above proof, we see that A 7→ C is, in fact, an
exact functor for A as in the proposition. Furthermore Rqp2∗ gives the
short exact sequence:
0
/A
/ C
/ π∗R1π∗A
/0.
Corollary 2.4 Every constructible sheaf F on an affine variety X is a
subsheaf of a constructible sheaf G on X so that the induced homomorphism
Hq(X, F ) → Hq(X, G) is zero for all q > 0.
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
Constructible Sheaves
483
Proof Let i : X → An be a closed immersion. From Theorem 1, we have
i∗F ⊂ T with T constructible so that Hq(An, T ) = 0 for all q > 0. The
commutative diagram:
Hq(An, i∗F )
Hq(An, T )
Hq(X, i∗i∗F )
/ Hq(X, i∗T ).
shows that G = i∗T is the desired sheaf.
(cid:3)
3 Ext and higher direct images
Definition and notation 3.1: Admissibility, F [U ] and RX .
An object F of Sh(X) is admissible if the functor Extq
Sh(X)(F, ·))C(X)
is effaceable for every q > 0.
Let F be a sheaf on X and let U be Zariski open in X. If j : U → X
denotes the inclusion, then F [U ] = j!j ∗F .
RX always denotes the constant sheaf on X with all stalks equal to R.
Lemma 3.2 Let
0
/ F ′
/F
/ F ′′
/0
be an exact sequence in Sh(X).
(a) Assume F ′′ is admissible and at least one of F ′, F is admissible. Then
all three are admissible.
(b) Assume F and F ′ are admissible, and also that
coker(HomSh(X)(F, ·) → HomSh(X)(F ′, ·))C(X)
is effaceable. Then F ′′ is admissible.
Proof Consider the long exact sequence of Ext:
Extq−1
Sh(X)(F ′, ·)
/ Extq
Sh(X)(F ′′, ·)
/ Extq
Sh(X)(F, ·)
/ Extq
Sh(X)(F ′, ·).
Let P be a constructible sheaf on X and let q > 0. For part (b), there is a
monomorphism P → Q with Q constructible that effaces Extq
Sh(X)(F, P ).
Next choose a monomorphism Q → S with S constructible that effaces
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
484
Madhav V. Nori
Extq−1
Sh(X)(F ′, Q) if q > 1. If q = 1, then Q → S is chosen so as to efface the
cokernel of HomSh(X)(F, Q) → HomSh(X)(F ′, Q). The long exact sequence
of Ext shows that P → S effaces Extq
Sh(X)(F ′′, P ). Part (a) follows in the
same manner.
(cid:3)
Corollary 3.3 below is an immediate consequence of Lemma 3.2(a).
Corollary 3.3 If 0 = F n ⊂ F n−1 ⊂ · · · ⊂ F 1 ⊂ F 0 = F and if all the
F i/F i+1 are admissible, then F is admissible.
Proposition 3.4 If F is constructible on X and f : X → Y is a morphism,
then Rqf∗F is constructible for all q ≥ 0.
Proof This proposition is by now well known; the conventional assump-
tion "N = all Noetherian R-modules" plays no role in the proof. It suffices
to prove the assertion in the two cases:(i) f is proper, and (ii) f is an open
immersion.
When f is proper, the proper base-change theorem, the existence of
Whitney stratifications, and Thom's isotopy lemma (see [GM, page 41])
together show that Rqf∗F is weakly constructible. By proper base-change,
the stalk of this sheaf at y ∈ Y (C) coincides with Hq(f −1y, F f −1y), which
is an object of N , by Proposition 1.6. Thus Rqf∗F is constructible.
When f is an open immersion, one chooses a Whitney stratification:
Y = finite disjoint union of Yi so that f!F Yi is locally constant for all i.
It follows that Rqf∗F Yi is locally constant, because we are in a "prod-
uct situation". The links L(p) (see [GM, page 41]) being finite simplicial
complexes, we're assured (e.g., by [KS, Prop. 8.1.4(ii)]) that the stalks of
Rqf∗F Yi are objects of N . This completes the proof.
(cid:3)
Lemma 3.5 Let F be an object of Sh(X).
(a) If F and F [U ] are both admissible where U ⊂ X is Zariski open, then
so is F/F [U ].
(b) Let V and W be Zariski open in X. Assume that F [V ], F [W ] and
F [V ∩ W ] are admissible. Then F [V ∪ W ] is also admissible (see 3.1
for notation).
Proof Both parts follow from Lemma 3.2(b). For (a), it is sufficient to
show that every constructible P is contained in a constructible Q with
HomSh(X)(F, Q) → HomSh(X)(F [U ], Q) surjective. Denoting by j and i
Constructible Sheaves
485
the inclusions of U and its complement Y in X respectively, the natural
arrow P → Q = j∗j ∗P ⊕ i∗i∗P is a monomorphism that has the desired
property because HomSh(X)(F [U ], i∗i∗P ) = 0 and
HomSh(X)(F [U ], j∗j ∗P ) = HomSh(X)(F, j∗j ∗P ) = HomSh(U)(j ∗F, j ∗P ).
That Q is constructible has been shown in Proposition 3.4 above.
For (b), consider the Mayer-Vietoris exact sequence:
0
/ F [V ∩ W ]
/ F [V ] ⊕ F [W ]
/ F [V ∪ W ]
/ 0.
We obtain Q from P as in the proof of part (a) by putting U = V ∩ W .
The surjectivity of HomSh(X)(F, Q) → HomSh(X)(F [V ∩ W ], Q) certainly
implies the surjectivity of
HomSh(X)(F [V ], Q) ⊕ HomSh(X)(F [W ], Q) → HomSh(X)(F [V ∩ W ], Q).
This completes the proof of the lemma.
(cid:3)
Proposition 3.6 Let U ⊂ X be Zariski open. Then RX [U ] is admissible
(see 3.1 for notation).
Proof We proceed by induction on the number n of affine open subsets
required to cover U . Now assume that U is affine (the case: n = 1).
Corollary 2.4 says that RU is admissible in Sh(U ). It follows that RX [U ] is
admissible in Sh(X) (see e.g., Remark 3.8(a)). For the general case, write
U = V ∪ W where V is covered by n − 1 affine opens and W is affine open.
Because X is separated, by Chevalley, V ∩ W is covered by n − 1 affine
open subsets in X, so we may assume the result for V, W and V ∩ W . The
admissibility of RX [U ] follows from Lemma 3.5(b).
(cid:3)
Proof (of Theorem 2) The proof of the admissibility of RX in Propo-
sition 3.6 above actually proves Theorem 2. In any case, the admissibility
plus the vanishing of Hq(X, F ) for q > 2 dim .(X) implies the theorem.
(cid:3)
Remark 3.7 Let F be a constructible sheaf on X with the additional
property that X is the union of a finite collection of Zariski locally closed
subsets Yi so that for each i, F Yi is a constant sheaf. Assume that R is
Noetherian and that N is the category of all finitely generated R-modules.
In this case, one can check that F is admissible. We will not use this
however in the sequel.
/
/
/
/
486
Madhav V. Nori
Remark 3.8 (Avoiding the use of injective objects) Let F : A → B
and G : B → A be adjoint functors, viz.,
φ(A, B) : Hom(F A, B) → Hom(A, GB)
for all objects A of A and B of B, is an isomorphism functorial in A and
B (see [Mac, Chapter IV, page 80]). Assume that A and B are Abelian
categories, and that F is left exact. Then it is standard (see [Toh]) that G
takes injectives to injectives. We will not assume that B possesses injective
objects. We will observe instead that the left exactness of F ensures:
For every monomorphism u : GB → A, there is a monomorphism
v : B → B′ so that Gv : GB → GB′ factors through u, i.e.
there is
w : A → GB′ so that Gv = w ◦ u. In particular, if H : A → C is effaceable,
then H ◦ G is also effaceable. The v : B → B′ is obtained simply as the
push-out of the natural arrow ǫ(B) : F GB → B with the monomorphism
F u : F GB → F A. Denote by t : F A → B′ the resulting arrow. The w is
then obtained as Gt ◦ η(A) where η(A) : A → GF A is the natural arrow.
For the dfns of ǫ(B) and η(A) see [Mac, Thm. 1, page 82]. The (F, G) we
are concerned with are:
(a) (j! ,j ∗) where j : U → X is an open immersion and A = C(U ) and
In particular, the admissibility of Q on U implies the
B = C(X).
admissibility of j!Q on X.
(b) (f ∗ ,f∗) where f : X → Y is a morphism and A = C(Y ) and
B = C(X).
(c) (P ⊗ · , Hom(P, ·)). Here R is assumed to be commutative, and P is
weakly constructible on X with all stalks finitely generated projective
modules and A = B = C(X).
Definition 3.9 (elementary, projectively elementary) A sheaf F on
X is elementary if there are Zariski open V ⊂ U ⊂ X and a locally constant
sheaf L on U so that F is isomorphic to j!(L/L[V ]), where j : U → X
denotes the inclusion.
If all the stalks of L are finitely generated projective R-modules, then F
will be called projectively elementary.
Proposition 3.10 Every weakly constructible sheaf F on X has a finite
filtration
0 = F n ⊂ F n−1 ⊂ · · · ⊂ F 1 ⊂ F 0 = F
so that F r/F r+1 is a direct summand of an elementary sheaf T r on X for
all r. Every stalk of T r is a finite direct sum of stalks of F . In particular,
Constructible Sheaves
487
if all the stalks of F are finitely generated projective R-modules, then the
T r above are projectively elementary.
We will assume the above proposition and proceed. Proposition 3.10 is
proved at the end of this section.
Proof (of Theorem 3) We first assume that F is projectively elemen-
tary.
Let L, U, V, F, j be as in the dfn of "projectively elementary". Because
L is a locally constant sheaf on a variety U with all stalks finitely gen-
erated projective, we see that Extq(L, D) = 0 for all q > 0 and for
all D on U . The spectral sequence (see [Toh, Thm. 4.2.1, page 188])
shows that Extq
Sh(U)(L, D) = Hq(U, Hom(L, D)). From Theorem 2 and
Remark 3.8(c), it follows that L is admissible on U . Replacing (L, U )
by (LV, V ) we see that that LV is admissible on V as well. From Re-
mark 3.8(a), we see that L[V ] is admissible on U . By Lemma 3.5(a), L/L[V ]
is admissible on U . By Remark 3.8(a) once again, F = j!(L/L[V ]) is also
admissible on X.
Evidently, any direct summand of an admissible is admissible. The
admissibility of P as in Theorem 3(a) now follows from Proposition 3.10
and Corollary 3.3.
(cid:3)
Theorem 3.11 Assume that A′, A, B′, B, F and G satisfy the properties
It then follows that the functors ReGB′ are
(1),(2),(3) and (4) below.
effaceable for all e > 0.
(1) A′ is a full Abelian subcategory of an Abelian category A. Every
object of A that is isomorphic to an object of A′ is an object of A′.
The category A possesses enough injectives. For every object A′ of
A′ and for every q > 0, the functor Extq
A(A′, ·)A′ is effaceable.
(2) B′ is a full Abelian subcategory of an Abelian category B. All the
properties in (1) above hold for B′ and B.
(3) G : B → A is a left exact functor so that RqGB′ is an object of A′
for all objects B′ of B′ and for all q ≥ 0.
(4) F : A → B is a left adjoint of G.
In addition, F is left exact.
Furthermore, F A′ is an object of B′ for all objects A′ of A′.
Proof Proceeding by induction on e, we assume the effaceability of RqGB′
for all q such that 0 < q < e. Let f : A′ → ReGB′ be a homomorphism in
488
Madhav V. Nori
A, where A′ and B′ are objects of A′ and B′ respectively. We will find a
monomorphism B′ → B′
e+1 in B′ so that the composite
A′
/ ReGB′
/ ReGB′
e+1
is zero. Consider the functor Hom(A′, ·) : A → Ab where Ab is the category
of Abelian groups. By (4) above, note that Hom(A′, ·) ◦ G = Hom(F A′, ·)
and that G takes injectives to injectives. From [Toh], for every object B of
B, we get the spectral sequence below, functorial in B:
Ep,q
2 (B) = Extp
A(A′, RqGB) ⇒ Extp+q
B (F A′, B).
(B′
2 (B′
0. The given f0 belongs to E0,e
We put f = f0 and B′ = B′
Its
differential δf0 belongs to E2,e−1
0). By the induction hypothesis, there
0 → B′
is a a monomorphism B′
1
induces zero on E2,e−1
1. Denoting
the image of f0 in E0,e
1).
Continuing in this manner, using the induction hypothesis alone, we obtain
a chain of elements fi ∈ E0,e
i) for 0 ≤ i < e and monomorphisms
i+1 in B′ for 0 ≤ i < e − 1 that take fi to fi+1. Note that this is
B′
meaningful because E0,e
2
1 in B′ that effaces Re−1GB′
0 → B′
. It follows that δf0 7→ 0 under B′
1) by f1 we see that f1 ∈ E0,e
0. Thus B′
0 → B′
3 (B′
1) ⊂ E0,e
i → B′
i+2. Next note that
i+2(B′
2 (B′
2 (B′
0).
2
i+3 ⊂ E0,e
e+1 (B′
δfe−1 ∈ Ee+1,0
e−1) = Exte+1
A (A′, GB′
e−1).
A (A′, ·)◦GB′ is effaceable. Thus we get a monomorphism B′
Assumptions (1) and (4), combined with Remark 3.8, imply that the functor
Exte+1
e−1 → B′
e
in B′ that effaces Exte+1
A (A′, B′
e−1), and as before, this monomorphism takes
fe−1 to fe with fe ∈ E0,e
e) = E0,e
e+2(B′
e). Finally, because e > 0, by (2),
e → B′
there is a monomorphism B′
e). Be-
cause E0,e
e), it follows that the induced
homomorphism E0,e
e+1) is zero. Consequently, fe 7→ 0
in Hom(A′, ReGB′
It follows that f 7→ 0 in
Hom(A′, ReGB′) → Hom(A′, ReGB′
∞ (B′
e) → Hom(A′, ReGB′
e) is a quotient of Exte(F A′, B′
e+1 in B′ that effaces Exte
e+1). This proves our claim.
e) → E0,e
B(F A′, B′
Now let f be the identity homomorphism of ReGB′. The theorem fol-
∞ (B′
∞ (B′
∞ (B′
e+1).
lows.
(cid:3)
Proof (of Theorem 4) Given a morphism f : X → Y , we substitute
(f ∗, f∗, Sh(Y ), C(Y ), Sh(X), C(X)) = (F, G, A, A′, B, B′)
in Theorem 3.11. The assumptions (1) and (2) of Theorem 3.11 are valid by
Theorem 3(b); assumption (3) is valid by Proposition 3.4, and assumption
(4) is evident. So Theorem 4 is a consequence of Theorem 3.11.
(cid:3)
/
/
Constructible Sheaves
489
Proof (of Theorem 5) Once again, we apply Theorem 3.11 to
A = B = Sh(X), A′ = B′ = C(X), and (F, G) = (P ⊗ · , Hom(P, ·)),
for any constructible sheaf P on X. To check that the assumptions of
Theorem 3.11 are valid, it remains to show that Extq(P, Q) is constructible
if both P and Q are constructible. By Proposition 3.10, it suffices to check
this for P = j!L where L is locally constant on U and j : U → X denotes the
inclusion. But Extq(j!L, Q) = Rqj∗Hom(L, j ∗Q) which is constructible by
Proposition 3.4. This completes the proof of Theorem 5.
(cid:3)
Proof (of Proposition 3.10) Let F be a weakly constructible sheaf on
a quasi-projective variety X. Let dim.supp.F = d. We will first find Zariski
open V ⊂ U ⊂ X, a locally constant sheaf L on U , and an isomorphism of
F U with a direct summand of L/L[V ] (see 3.1 and 3.9 for notation).
Let Z1 be the support of F . Let Z2 be the union of all the d-dimensional
irreducible components of Z1. Let Z3 be the largest Zariski open subset
of Z2 so that F Z3 is locally constant. Let U ′ ⊂ X be an affine open
subset so that U ′ ∩ Z1 = U ′ ∩ Z3 and U ′ ∩ Z3 is Zariski dense in Z3.
Choose a finite surjective morphism U ′ ∩ Z1 → Ad and extend it to a
morphism h′ : U ′ → Ad. Let W ⊂ Ad be non-empty Zariski open. Put
U = h′−1W , Z = U ∩ Z1 and V = U − Z. Denote the restriction of h′
to U by h : U → W . Put f = hZ : Z → W . The sheaf G = F Z is
locally constant by assumption. The W is chosen so that f : Z → W is an
etale morphism (note that f is already assumed to be a finite morphism);
It follows that L = h∗f∗G is
this ensures that f∗G is locally constant.
also a locally constant sheaf. Note that f ∗f∗G = LZ has G as a direct
summand because f is etale. Denoting by i : Z → U the inclusion, we see
that i∗G = F U is a direct summand of i∗(LZ) = L/L[V ].
From the above, we see that F [U ] is a direct summand of an elemen-
tary sheaf. Put QF = F/F [U ]. Because dim.supp.QF < d, induction on
dim.supp.F proves the proposition with the length of the desired filtration
bounded above by 1+dim.supp.F , when X is quasi-projective. In the gen-
eral case, one proceeds by Noetherian induction, replacing the hypothesis
" U ′ ∩ Z3 is Zariski dense in Z3" by " U ′ ∩ Z3 is non-empty".
(cid:3)
References
[AF]
A. Andreotti, and T. Frankel, The Lefschetz theorem on hyper-
plane sections, Ann. of Math. 69 No.2 (1959), 713 -- 717.
490
[Be1]
[Be2]
[Bo]
[KS]
[GM]
[HL1]
[HL2]
[Mac]
[Mil]
Madhav V. Nori
A.A. Beilinson, Notes on absolute Hodge cohomology, Applica-
tions of algebraic K-theory to algebraic geometry and number
theory, Part I, II (Boulder, Colo., 1983), 35 -- 68, Contemp. Math.
55 Amer. Math. Soc., 1986.
A.A. Beilinson, On the derived category of perverse sheaves,
p. 27 -- 41, in "K-theory, arithmetic and geometry" ed. Yu. I.
Manin, Lect. Not. in Math. 1289 Springer-Verlag, 1987.
A. Borel, et al., Algebraic D-modules, Perspectives in Mathemat-
ics, Vol. 2, Academic Press, 1987.
M. Kashiwara, and P. Schapira, Sheaves on manifolds,
Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften 292, Springer-
Verlag, 1990.
M. Goresky, and R. Macpherson, Stratified Morse Theory, Ergeb-
nisse der Mathematik; 3. Folge, Band 14, Springer-Verlag 1988.
H.A. Hamm, and T. Le, Vanishing theorems for constructible
sheaves, I, J. Reine Angew. Math. 471 (1996), 115 -- 138.
H. Hamm, and T. Le, Vanishing theorems for constructible
sheaves, II, Kodai Math. J. 21 (1998) no. 2, 208 -- 247.
S. Mac Lane, Categories for the Working Mathematician, Second
edition, Graduate Texts in Math. 5, Springer-Verlag, 1998.
J. Milnor, Morse theory, Annals of Mathematics Studies, 51,
Princeton University Press, 1963.
[SGA4] M. Artin, A. Grothendieck and J.L. Verdier, Theorie des Topos et
Cohomologie Etale des Schemas SGA4, Tome 3, Springer LNM
305, 1973.
[SGA4 1
2 ] P. Deligne, et al., Cohomologie etale Springer LNM 569, 1977.
[Toh]
A. Grothendieck, Sur Quelques Points D'algebre Homologique,
Tohoku Math. J., 9 (1957), 119 -- 221.
The University of Chicago, 5734 S.University Ave, Il 60637
USA
E-mail: [email protected]
|
1112.0352 | 1 | 1112 | 2011-12-01T22:46:14 | Deformation functors of local actions | [
"math.AG",
"math.NT"
] | We study the behaviour of infinitesimal deformation functors of local group actions with regard to passing to subgroups and quotient groups. Inspired by the cohomological information, we conjecture the existence of a decomposition of a deformation functor of a local $G$-action as a smooth extension of a fibered product of functors related to a subgroup and a quotient group of $G$. | math.AG | math |
DEFORMATION FUNCTORS OF LOCAL ACTIONS
JAKUB BYSZEWSKI
Abstract. We study the behaviour of infinitesimal deformation functors of
local group actions with regard to passing to subgroups and quotient groups.
Inspired by the cohomological information, we conjecture the existence of a
decomposition of a deformation functor of a local G-action as a smooth ex-
tension of a fibered product of functors related to a subgroup and a quotient
group of G.
Let H be a finite group acting on a smooth curve X over a perfect field k of
positive characteristic p > 0. For every closed point x ∈ X, we can consider the
action of the stabilizer G = Hx of the point x on the completed local ring of the
curve R = bOX,x. Since the curve is smooth, R is a power series ring in one variable
over k, and we obtain in this way an action ρ of G on k[[t]]. We call such actions
local group actions (of the group G). Consider the infinitesimal (local) deformation
functor DG which classifies lifts of ρ to local artinian rings with residue field k. In
the article, we study the behaviour of the deformation functors DG with regard to
passing to subgroups and quotient groups of G.
Let N be a normal subgroup of G. In sections 2 and 3 we define a restriction
map
and an induction map
res : DG → DG/N
N
ind : DG → DG/N .
The tangent map to res coincides with the familiar restriction map in group coho-
mology res: H1(G, Θ) → H1(N, Θ)G/N . A similar cohomological description for the
tangent map to ind is given in Theorem 3.4. The maps res and ind provide a "lift"
of the known cohomological operations to the level of local deformation functors
and can be used to study the relation between the functors DG, DN and DG/N .
An easy case is the following one: if the order of the group G/N is prime to p and
the functor DN is pro-representable, then the functor DG/N vanishes and the map
DG → DG/N
is an isomorphism (Theorem 2.8).
N
Similar questions can also be investigated for the global deformation functor
DX,G of a curve X with an action of a group G. In the global case, DX,G is pro-
representable and the map DX,G → DG/N
X,N is an isomorphism under rather weak
assumptions (e.g., genus(X) > 2 suffices, cf. [1, p. 1909]).
The general situation for local deformation functors is much more complicated,
and both functors DN and DG/N play a role. We pose the following question: Does
there exist a pro-representable functor F such that the map
(res, ind) : DG → DG/N
N ×F DG/N
is smooth? As first evidence, we see that this is true at the cohomological level (cf.
Corollary 4.3). We approach the question as follows: we consider the morphism
(res, ind) : DG → DG/N
N × DG/N
1
2
JAKUB BYSZEWSKI
and study the deformation theory of this morphism. In our main result (Theorem
4.9), we describe -- under additional assumptions of pro-representability -- a com-
plete obstruction space for this morphism. The construction of this obstruction
space is cohomological. In the light of Proposition 4.8, the result provides evidence
for a positive answer to the question.
The interrelationship between establishing pro-representability and computing
versal deformation rings was already seen in [4] (cf. particularly Remark 3.3 of loc.
cit.) and was rather a surprise. For a longer discussion of pro-representability of
local deformation functors, see the end of section 1.
A positive answer to the posed question would enable an explicit computation of
the deformation ring of DG in terms of the deformation rings of DN and DG/N (cf.
Remark 4.5). It is conceivable that these "d´evissage" techniques can contribute to an
inductive solution to the problem of lifting group actions on curves to characteristic
zero as for example in the problem of Oort (cf. e.g. [6]), but at present we do not
know of such an application. One of the difficulties is certainly that the knowledge
of the complete universal deformation ring is an overkill with respect to the mere
question of the existence of a lift to characteristic zero (for which it is enough to
know only the characteristic of the versal deformation ring).
Acknowledgements. The work has been done at the University of Utrecht with
the financial support of the Netherlands Organisation of Scientific Research un-
der the VIDI project no. 52307314 of Gunther Cornelissen and at the Universit´e
de Versailles/Universit´e Paris-Sud 11 with the financial support of the European
Community under the Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry programme.
I'm most grateful to Gunther Cornelissen and Ariane M´ezard for the discussions,
their encouragement and interest in this work. It was Ariane M´ezard who first asked
me the question about the relation between the functors DG, DN and DG/N . I would
also like to thank an anonymous referee for helpful comments.
1. Introduction
Let k be a perfect field with char(k) = p > 0 and let G be a finite group.
Definition 1.1. A local G-action is an injective homomorphism ρ : G → Autk k[[t]].
We will study infinitesimal deformation functors of local G-actions. These func-
tors are defined on a suitable category of artinian rings. Let W (k) be the ring of
(p-)Witt vectors over the field k and let C be the category of local artinian W (k)-
algebras with residue field k and local morphisms of W (k)-algebras.
Definition 1.2. A lift of ρ to an object A of C is a homomorphism ρA : G →
AutAA[[t]] which reduces to ρ modulo mA. Two lifts ρA, ρ′
A are equivalent if they
are conjugate by an element χ ∈ ker (AutA A[[t]] → Autk k[[t]]), i.e., if for every g ∈ G
A(g) = χρA(g)χ−1. The infinitesimal deformation functor of ρ is a functor
we have ρ′
Dρ : C → Sets
which maps A to the set of equivalence classes of lifts of ρ to A. By abuse of
notation, we usually write DG for Dρ.
We use a notational convention typical for deformation theory: whenever we
denote an element of a local ring A by ε, we tacitly assume that mAε = 0. Further-
more, k[ε] denotes the ring k[w]/w2. A surjection p : A′ → A in C is called small if
its kernel I is annihilated by mA′. In this case I is a finite dimensional vector space
over k.
Denote by Θ = Derk k[[t]] the module of derivations of the ring k[[t]] with the
natural action of G given by dg = ρ(g)−1dρ(g), g ∈ G. To simplify the notation, we
DEFORMATION FUNCTORS OF LOCAL ACTIONS
3
write ΓA = AutA A[[t]] for A in C. Given a map A′ → A, we denote by ΓA′,A the
kernel of the map ΓA′ → ΓA.
Lemma 1.3. Let A′ → A be a small surjection in C with kernel I.
(i) The map m : Θ ⊗I → ΓA′,A given by m(d ⊗ ε)(x) = x + εd(¯x) is an iso-
morphism.
(ii) Let γ ∈ ΓA′,A and let γg ∈ ΓA′ be such that γg = ρ(g). Then γgγγ−1
g = γg,
where we regard ΓA′,A as a G-module via the map m above. In particular,
the subgroups ΓA′,A and ΓA′,k commute element-wise.
The proof is immediate.
We call the set TD = D(k[ε]) the tangent space to D. A standard calculation
shows that it is bijective with the group cohomology H1(G, Θ) via a map which
associates to a class of a one-cocycle γg in Θ ⊗kε ≃ Γk[ε],k the class of a lift ρA(g) =
γgρ(g). In particular, this set has a natural structure of a finite dimensional vector
space over k.
Given a small surjection A′ → A in C with kernel I, we can consider the question
whether a given element κ ∈ DG(A) lies in the image of the map D(A′) → D(A).
Choose a morphism ρ : G → AutA A[[t]] in the class of κ. A standard construction
produces a two-cocycle η(g, h) = ρ∗(g)ρ∗(h)ρ∗(gh)−1 with values in ΓA′,A ≃ Θ ⊗I,
where ρ∗ : G → AutA′ A′[[t]] is a set-theoretic function which is a lift of ρ to A′.
This cocycle gives an obstruction to lifting κ to DG(A′). This shows that the space
H2(G, Θ) is an obstruction space to the functor DG (for a precise definition of an
obstruction space in a slightly more general context, cf. Definition 4.6).
We now briefly recall the concepts of pro-representability and versal hull (for
more information, cf. [13]). Consider the category C consisting of local noetherian
W (k)-algebras with residue field k. The category C is a full subcategory of C. A
functor D : C → Set is called pro-representable if there exists an object R in C
such that D is isomorphic to the functor hR = Hom C(R, ·). Such a ring R is then
unique and is called the universal deformation ring of D. A morphism D → E
of functors D, E : C → Set such that D(k) and E(k) are one-point sets is called
smooth if for any surjective morphism A′ → A in C the induced map D(A′) →
D(A) ×E(A) E(A′) is surjective. A functor D : C → Set is said to have a versal hull
if there is a smooth morphism ϕ : hR → D from a pro-representable functor hR
which induces an isomorphism on tangent spaces. If a functor has a versal hull, it is
unique (up to a nonunique isomorphism). The ring R is called a versal deformation
ring. The morphism ϕ is always surjective and it is injective if and only if D is pro-
representable. If A′ → A is a small surjection in C with kernel I and D has a versal
hull, the group TD ⊗ I acts transitively on the fibers of the map D(A′) → D(A).
If D is furthermore pro-representable than this action is free making the fibers of
D(A′) → D(A) into torsors under the action of TD ⊗ I.
It is well-known that the functors DG satisfy the conditions of Schlessinger [13],
and hence have a versal hull. For some of the results, we will need a stronger
condition of pro-representability. It might seem at first that this stronger condition
is unlikely, since the functors DG have very many "infinitesimal automorphisms",
whereas pro-representability in algebraic geometry is usually related to "smallness"
of the space of infinitesimal automorphisms. Nevertheless, the condition has been
established to hold in several cases. Recall that a local G-action ρ induces on the
group G a decreasing filtration of higher ramification groups G ⊇ G1 ⊇ G2 ⊇ . . .
with
Gi = {σ ∈ G ordt(ρ(σ)(t) − t) > i},
i ≥ 1.
If G1 is zero, we call the action tamely ramified. This happens only if the order of G
is coprime with p. If G2 is zero, we call the action weakly ramified. It has been shown
4
JAKUB BYSZEWSKI
(cf. [11]) that every local action coming from an action of a group on an ordinary
curve is weakly ramified. Pro-representability of weakly ramified local deformation
functors has been established except when p = 2 and G = Z/2 or G = Z/2 ⊕ Z/2
(cf. [4]), when it fails. This list of two counterexamples further reduces to only a
single one (namely, G = Z /2) if one restricts oneself to the associated equichar-
acteristic functor. (By this we mean that we restrict the deformation functor to
the full subcategory of C consisting of these artinian rings which are k-algebras.
The equicharacteristic deformation functor can be pro-representable without the
original functor being pro-representable. This is the case of the weakly ramified
G = Z/2 ⊕ Z/2 action.) More generally, if n is the smallest integer such that
Gn+1 = 0, one sometimes says that the Hasse conductor of the action is n. A single
case of higher conductor has also been resolved. This is when when p = 5, G = Z/5
and the conductor is two, with the resulting functor being pro-representable as well
(cf. [5]). All this seems to suggest that the assumption of pro-representability is a
weak one, though admittedly the evidence is not yet conclusive.
2. Restriction
In this section we study the operation of restricting a local action to a subgroup.
Let ρ be a local G-action and let N be a normal subgroup of G. Restricting the
action of the group to N we obtain a restriction morphism res : DG → DN .
Definition 2.1. We define an action of G/N on the functor DN . The action of G
on the set DN (A)
G × DN (A) → DN (A)
(g, κ) 7→ g∗κ
is given as follows: Choose a representative ρA : N → ΓA of κ ∈ DN (A) and define
g∗κ as the class of
g∗ρA(n) = rgρA(g−1ng)r−1
g ,
where we write rg for a lift of ρ(g) to A, i.e., rg = ρ(g).
Proposition 2.2. The construction above induces an action of the group G/N on
the functor DN . Deformations lying in the image of the restriction map res: DG →
DN are invariant under the action of G/N .
Proof. All the properties are straightforward to verify. As an example, we show
that g∗h∗ = (gh)∗ for g, h ∈ G. Indeed, we have
g∗(h∗ρA)(n) = rgrhρA(h−1g−1ngh)r−1
h r−1
g
with
= χ2 ((gh)∗ρA(n)) χ−1
2
χ2 = rgrhr−1
gh ∈ ΓA,k. (cid:3)
Remark 2.3. The action of G/N on DN has the following global analogue. Let X
be a projective smooth geometrically connected curve over k with a faithful action
of a group G and let N be a normal subgroup of G. As in the local case, one
can consider the deformation functor DX,N of the pair (X, N ). A deformation of
(X, N ) to A is a triple (XA, ρA, i), where XA → Spec A is flat, ρA : N → AutA XA
ia a lift of ρ and i : X → XA is an N -equivariant map inducing an isomorphism
X → XA ⊗A k. There is an action of the group G/N on the functor DX,N , defined
as follows: An element g ∈ G acts on DX,N (A) by mapping the triple
α =(cid:0)XA, N
ρA−−→ AutA(XA), X i−→ XA(cid:1)
DEFORMATION FUNCTORS OF LOCAL ACTIONS
5
to
g∗α =(cid:0)XA, N
ig−→ N
ρA−−→ AutA(XA), X
ρ(g)
−−→ X i−→ XA(cid:1),
where ig is the inner conjugation ig(h) = ghg−1. Restricting the group action
induces a map res : DX,G → DG/N
X,N .
Proposition 2.4. The action of G/N on the tangent space TDN = H1(N, Θ) corre-
sponds to the standard action as defined in group cohomology. The restriction map
induces on tangent spaces the map
resk[ε] : TDG → T G/N
DN
,
which is equal to the restriction morphism H1(G, Θ) → H1(N, Θ)G/N in group co-
homology.
Proof. Let A = k[ε]. We can write any element κ ∈ DG(A) as a class of a lift
ρA(g) = γgρ(g) of ρ to A with γg ∈ Θ ∼= ΓA,k and κ = [γg] ∈ H1(G, Θ). In the
definiton of g∗κ we can choose rg = ρ(g). By Lemma 1.3, we have
g∗ρA(n) = ρ(g)ρA(g−1ng)ρ(g)−1
= ρ(g)γg−1ngρ(g−1ng)ρ(g)−1
= γg
g−1ngρ(n).
Thus on cohomology the group action takes the form
g∗(cid:2)γn(cid:3) =(cid:2)γg
g−1ng(cid:3).
This is the standard action (cf. [10, p. 117]).
The fact that the restriction map on tangent spaces corresponds to the restriction
(cid:3)
map on cohomology is obvious.
Restriction maps DG into DG/N
-- a subfunctor of DN consisting of elements
invariant under the action of G/N . The information we have is already sufficient
to compute universal deformation rings in some special cases.
N
Proposition 2.5. If the functor D : C → Set is pro-representable, say by a ring
R, and a group G acts on D, then the functor DG is also pro-representable, and its
universal ring is
R/({gx − x g ∈ G, x ∈ R}).
Remark 2.6. The ring S = R/({gx − x g ∈ G, x ∈ R}) can be described in
categorical terms as the ring of co-invariants of the action of G on R, i.e., a ring
universal for all morphisms R → S such that for any g ∈ G the following diagram
commutes:
@
@
@
@
@
R
g
R
@
@
/ S.
It is clear that to construct the ring of co-invariants, one has to take the quotient
of R by the ideal generated by elements of the form gx − x, g ∈ G, x ∈ R.
Proof of Proposition 2.5. The action on the left of the group G on D ∼= hR cor-
responds by Yoneda's lemma to the action of G on the right on the ring R. The
functor DG is thus pro-representable by the ring of co-invariants of the ring R by
the action of G.
(cid:3)
Corollary 2.7.
(i) If the functor DN is pro-representable, then so is DG/N
N .
/
6
JAKUB BYSZEWSKI
(ii) The tangent space to the functor DG/N
N
is H1(N, Θ)G/N .
(cid:3)
Theorem 2.8. Assume that the order of G/N is prime to p and denote the versal
deformation rings of functors DG and DN by RG and RN . Assume furthermore
that the functor DN is pro-representable. Then the restriction map
res : DG → DG/N
N
is an isomorphism. In particular, DG is also pro-representable, and
RG ∼= RN /({gx − x g ∈ G, x ∈ R}).
Proof. We have seen in Proposition 2.4 that on the tangent spaces the map res: DG →
DG/N
of G/N is prime to p, in the Hochschild-Serre spectral sequence
corresponds to the restriction map H1(G, Θ) → H1(N, Θ)G/N . Since the order
N
Hp(G/N, Hq(N, Θ)) ⇒ Hn(G, Θ)
all elements outside the zeroth column vanish. Thus the restriction maps
res : Hn(G, Θ) → Hn(N, Θ)G/N
are isomorphisms. For n = 1, this shows that resk[ε] is an isomorphism.
We prove that the map res is smooth. Choose a small extension
e : 0 → I → A′ → A → 0
and an element
(κA, λA′ ) ∈ DG(A) ×DG/N
N (A) DG/N
N (A′).
Let νe(κA) ∈ H2(G, Θ) ⊗ I be the obstruction to lifting κA to A′. Since res(κA) lifts
to A′, we see that res(νe(κA)) = 0. The map
res : H2(G, Θ) → H2(N, Θ)G/N
is an isomorphism, and hence νe(κA) = 0. Thus, there is no obstruction to lifting
κA to A′ and there exists a κA′ ∈ DG(A′) lying above κA. The deformation κA′
does not necessarily map to λA′ , but its image res(κA′) and λA′ do lie in the same
fiber of DG/N
is pro-representable, the
⊗ I
fiber is a torsor under the action of TDG/N
to be
N (A). Since the functor DG/N
⊗ I. Hence we can define ξ ∈ TDG/N
N (A′) → DG/N
N
N
N
Let ζ ∈ TDG ⊗ I be such that res(ζ) = ξ. Then the element κA′ − ζ ∈ DG(A′) maps
to (κA, λA′) by the map
ξ = res(κA′) − λA′ .
DG(A′) → DG(A) ×DG/N
N (A) DG/N
N (A′).
Hence res is ´etale, i.e., smooth and isomorphic on tangent spaces) and the claim
follows from Proposition 2.5.
(cid:3)
Remark 2.9. We follow the notation of Remark 2.3. For global deformation func-
tors, the restriction map induces an isomorphism res: DX,G → DG/N
X,N whenever
genus(X) > 2 (cf. [1, p. 1909]).
Proposition 2.10. Let ρ : G → Autk k[[t]] be a weakly ramified local action of a
group G whose order is divisible by p, but not divisible by p2, p > 3. Then the
functor DG is pro-representable by W [ζp + ζ −1
p ] if G = Z/p or if G is the dihedral
group Dp. Otherwise, DG is pro-representable by k.
DEFORMATION FUNCTORS OF LOCAL ACTIONS
7
Proof. Consider the higher ramification groups Gi of G (cf. [14, Ch. IV]). Then
P = G1 is a normal p-Sylow subgroup of G and hence is a cyclic subgroup of order p.
We know by §5.3, Case 1 that DP is pro-representable by the ring RP = W [ζp+ζ −1
p ],
where ζp is the p-th primitive root of unity. Thus RP is a complete discrete valuation
ring. By Theorem 2.8, DG is pro-representable by the ring of C-co-invariants of
RP , where C = G/P = Z/m. Since the order of C is prime to p, C has a trivial
intersection with the wild inertia (cf. [14, Corollaire 3 to Proposition IV.7]). Thus
we have the following two cases:
(i) The action of C on mRP /m2
(ii) The action of C on mRP /m2
RP is trivial, and thus RP /C = RP .
RP is nontrivial, and thus RP /C = k.
RP is the tangent space H1(P, Θ) to the functor DP and
The vector space mRP /m2
so we can distinguish between cases (i) and (ii) by a purely group cohomological
calculation. Such a computation was done in [7, §3.7].
(cid:3)
3. Induction
3.1. Generalities. Let ρ : G → Γk be a local G-action, and let N be a normal
subgroup of G. Consider the ring of N -invariants k[[t]]N . Every automorphism ρ(g)
of k[[t]] restricts to a map on k[[t]]N . The map clearly depends only on the class g,
and we denote it by ρ(g)♯. We show below (Lemma 3.1) that k[[t]]N = k[[y]] and
hence ρ♯ : G/N → Autk k[[y]] = Γ♯
k is a local G/N -action. This allows us to consider
the deformation functor DG/N of the local action ρ♯. We will construct an induction
map ind : DG → DG/N .
Lemma 3.1. Let ρA : G → ΓA be a lift of ρ to an object A of C. Then
A[[t]]G = A[[y]],
where y =Qg∈G ρA(g)(t).
Proof. The proof will be by induction on length of A.
Case A = k: By Galois theory, the field of G-invariants of k((t)) is k((y)) (it is
clearly invariant and it has the proper index.) The claim follows.
Case A 6= k: In this case length of A is at least 2, and we can find a principal
surjection ϕ : A → A0 in C with kernel εA and mA ε = 0. Furthermore, we may
assume that the claim holds for A0. We clearly have A[[y]] ⊆ A[[t]]G. Now, for any
f ∈ A[[t]]G, the image ϕ∗f of f in A0[[t]] lies in A0[[t]]G = A0[[ϕ∗y]]. Choosing any lift
f1 of ϕ∗f to A[[y]], we can write f = f1 + h with f1 ∈ A[[y]], h ∈ εA[[t]]. Furthermore,
h has to be G-invariant, since so are both f and f1. We have εA[[t]] ≃ k[[t]] and the
induced action of G on k[[t]] is given by ρ. Since h is G-invariant, it lies in k[[¯y]],
where ¯y is the image of y in k[[t]]. Consequently, we can write h = εu with u ∈ A[[y]].
This shows that f = f1 + εu lies in A[[y]] and finishes the proof of the inclusion
A[[t]]G ⊆ A[[y]].
(cid:3)
The induction map DG : DG/N is constructed as follows: let κ ∈ DG(A) be
a class of a lift ρA : G → AutA A[[t]]. Restricting the automorphisms to the sub-
ring A[[t]]N produces an action of G/N on the ring A[[t]]N . We define the local
A : G/N → AutA A[[y]] using the isomorphism A[[y]] ≃ A[[t]]N mapping y to
action ρ♯
A does not
depend on the equivalence class of ρA and that we obtain in this way a morphism
of functors DG → DG/N .
Qs∈N ρA(s)(t). It is immediate to check that the equivalence class of ρ♯
Remark 3.2. We continue to use the notation and assumptions of Remark 2.3. The
induction map also has a global analogue ind : DX,G → DX/N,G/N . It maps the
8
triple
to
For details, see [3].
JAKUB BYSZEWSKI
(cid:0)XA, G → AutA(XA), X → XA(cid:1)
(cid:0)XA/N, G/N → AutA(XA/N ), X/N → XA/N(cid:1).
3.2. Tangent map. In this subsection, we will compute the action of the induction
map on the tangent spaces. Recall our setup: ρ : G → Γk is a local G-action and N
is a normal subgroup of G. Then we have extensions of discrete valuation rings:
k[[t]]G ⊆ k[[t]]N ⊆ k[[t]].
Lemma 3.1 gives k[[t]]G = k[[yG]] and k[[t]]N = k[[yN ]], where yG = Qg∈G ρ(g)(t)
and yN = Qs∈N ρ(s)(t). Recall that we write Θ = Derk k[[t]], and similarly we
denote Θ♯ = Derk(k[[t]]N ) = Derk k[[yN ]]. If d ∈ ΘN , then dρ(s) = ρ(s)d for s ∈ N ,
and hence d(k[[t]]N ) ⊆ k[[t]]N . Restricting d to the subring k[[t]]N , we obtain an
embedding ΘN ֒→ Θ♯. The map takes the form
a(t)
d
dt
7→ a(t)
dy
dt
d
dy
,
and hence is injective.
Lemma 3.3. The maps
Θ → Dk[[t]]/k[[t]]G
d 7→ d(yG)
Θ♯ → Dk[[t]]N/k[[t]]G
d 7→ d(yG)
are isomorphisms of G-modules. The maps agree with the natural embeddings
ΘN
≀
Θ♯
≀
Dk[[t]] /k[[t]]G ∩ k[[t]]N
/ Dk[[t]]N /k[[t]]G.
Proof. The maps are bijective by [14, Corollaire III.6.2]. The maps are G-equivariant
by an easy calculation (cf. [2, proof of Th´eor`eme 4.1.1]).
(cid:3)
Consider the ideal Θ1 = Dk[[t]]N/k[[t]]Gk[[t]] as a G-module. Clearly
We can picture relations between these ideals as follows:
ΘN
1 = Θ1 ∩ k[[t]]N = Θ♯ .
ΘN ⊂ Θ
∩
∩
Θ♯ = ΘN
1 ⊂ Θ1
∩
∩
k[[t]]N ⊂ k[[t]] .
The map ind : DG → DG/N induces on tangent spaces the map
indk[ε] : H1(G, Θ) → H1(G/N, Θ♯).
/
/
/
DEFORMATION FUNCTORS OF LOCAL ACTIONS
9
Theorem 3.4. The following diagram is commutative:
H1(G/N, ΘN )
/ H1(G/N, Θ♯)
inf
7nnnnnnnnnnnn
indk[ε]
inf
H1(G, Θ)
/ H1(G, Θ1),
where inf is the usual inflation map in group cohomology.
Proof. The square commutes by functoriality of the maps inf. Since the right most
map is injective, it is enough to prove that the right hand side triangle commutes.
Denote A = k[ε]. A lift of ρA : G → ΓA corresponding to a 1-cocycle d : G → Θ is
given by
The image of [dg] by the induction map is the class of a cocycle (d♯
¯g) such that
ρA(g)(x) = ρ(g)(x) + εdg(ρ(g)(x)).
ρ♯
A(¯g)(u) = ρ♯(¯g)(u) + εd♯
¯g(cid:0)ρ♯(¯g)(u)(cid:1) .
Denote yA
(1)
N =Qs∈N ρA(s)(t). Note that
N = Ys∈N
ρA(s)(t) = Ys∈N
yA
On the one hand, we have
ds(fs)
fs
.
(fs + εds(fs)) = yN + εyN Xs∈N
N ) = Ys∈N
NXs∈N
ρA(gs)(t) = Ys∈N
dgs(fgs)
fgs
.
ρ♯
A(¯g)(yA
N ) = ρA(g)(yA
(fgs + εdgs(fgs))
= yg
N + εyg
(2)
On the other hand,
(3)
ρ♯
A(¯g)(yA
N ),
N ) denotes the power series ρ♯(¯g)(yN ) with yA
N ) = ρ♯(¯g)(yA
N ) + εd♯
¯g(yg
where ρ♯(¯g)(yA
equation (1), we can compute
N substituted for yN . By
(4)
Since d♯
¯g(yg
N ) = dyg
N
dyN
(5)
d♯
¯g(yN ) = yg
ρ♯(¯g)(yA
N ) = ρ♯(¯g)(yN ) +
dyg
N
= yg
N + εyN
dρ♯(¯g)(yN )
dyN
(yA
N − yN )
dyN Xs∈N
ds(fs)
fs
.
d♯
¯g(yN ), equations (2), (3) and (4) give
N
N(cid:18) dyg
dyN(cid:19)−1Xs∈N
dgs(fgs)
fgs
− yN Xs∈N
ds(fs)
fs
.
To see that the map given by this formula makes the diagram commute, we need
a computation. We break the proof here in order to state a number of lemmas
necessary to perform this computation.
Since we will need to make similar computations later on, we state the results
in a version useful also for those future applications.
Lemma 3.5. Let ρ : G → Γk be a local G-action, N be a normal subgroup of G
and denote fg = ρ(g)(t). Let a : G → k((t)) be a cochain such that
ags = ag
s + ag,
g ∈ G, s ∈ N.
_
/
_
7
/
10
Let
Then
JAKUB BYSZEWSKI
dt (cid:19)−1Xs∈N
α = −yN(cid:18) dyN
N(cid:18) dyg
dt (cid:19)−1Xs∈N
ags
N
as
dfs
dt
f −1
s ∈ k((t)).
dfgs
dt
f −1
gs + yN(cid:18) dyN
dt (cid:19)−1Xs∈N
as
dfs
dt
f −1
s
.
(i) αg − α = ag − yg
In particular,
αs − α = as
for
s ∈ N.
(ii) Denote by ord the t-adic valuation on k((t)) and by d = ord(cid:0)DR/RN(cid:1) the
order of the different of the extension RN ⊆ R. Then
ord(α) > inf
s∈N
ord(as) + #N − d − 1.
N =Qs∈N fgs and thus
N Xs∈N
dyg
N
dt
= yg
dfgs
dt
f −1
gs .
Proof. (i) We have yg
(6)
We compute
(7)
αg = −yg
N
N(cid:18) dyg
dfg (cid:19)−1Xs∈N
dt (cid:19)−1
N(cid:18) dyg
agXs∈N
N
= yg
Equations (6) and (7) yield
ag
s
dfgs
dfg
f −1
gs
dfgs
dt
gs − yg
f −1
N(cid:18) dyg
dt (cid:19)−1Xs∈N
ags
N
N(cid:18) dyg
αg = ag − yg
dfgs
dt
f −1
gs .
N
dt (cid:19)−1Xs∈N
ags
dfgs
dt
f −1
gs .
This gives the claim.
(ii) We know that ord( dyN
now have
ord(α) > ord(yN ) − ord(cid:18) dyN
dt (cid:19) + inf
s∈N
dt ) = d [14, Corollaire III.6.2] and ord(yN ) = #N . We
ord(as
dfs
dt
f −1
s
) = #N − d + inf
s∈N
(ord(as)) − 1,
since ord(fs) = 1 and ord( dfs
dt ) = 0.
(cid:3)
Proposition 3.6 (Effective version of Hilbert's theorem 90). Let I ⊆ J be two
fractional ideals of R = k[[t]] and let ρ : G → Autk R be a local G-action. Write
d = ord(Dk[[t]] /k[[t]]N ). Assume that
Then the natural map H1(G, I) → H1(G, J) is the zero map.
ord(IJ −1) > d − #G + 1.
Proof of Proposition 3.6. Apply Lemma 3.5 to the cocycle a : G → I and N = G.
We obtain in this way an α ∈ k((t)) such that αg − α = ag and
ord(α) > inf
g∈G
(ord(ag)) + #G − d − 1.
By the assumption, this gives
ord(α) > ord(I) − ord(IJ −1) = ord(J).
Hence α ∈ J. Since ag = αg − α, the image of (ag) vanishes in H1(G, J).
(cid:3)
DEFORMATION FUNCTORS OF LOCAL ACTIONS
11
Remark 3.7. Denote by K the fraction field of R. By the additive Hilbert's the-
orem 90, the group H1(G, K) vanishes and hence the composite map H1(G, I) →
H1(G, J) → H1(G, K) is zero. The lemma gives an explicit bound on where the
"splitting" happens.
We will now give a version of Lemma 3.5 in a slightly different context.
Corollary 3.8. Let d : G → Θ be a cochain such that
dgs = dg
s + dg,
g ∈ G, s ∈ N.
Let
Then
(i) αg − α = dg(yG) − yg
N
α = −yN
ds(fs)
.
fs
dyG
dyN Xs∈N
dyN(cid:19)−1Xs∈N
N
dyG
dyN (cid:18) dyg
dgs(fgs)
fgs
+ yN
dyG
dyN Xs∈N
ds(fs)
fs
.
(ii) α lies in Θ1 (under the identification of Lemma 3.3).
Proof. (i) Apply Lemma 3.5 to the cocycle a : G → k((t)) obtained by composing
d : G → Θ with the isomorphism Θ ≃ Dk[[t]] /k[[t]]G ⊆ k((t)). Then
and the claim follows.
ag = dg(yG) =
dyG
dt
dg(t)
(ii) From the definition of α, we get
ord(α) > #N + ord(cid:18) dyG
dyN(cid:19) − 1 > ord(cid:18) dyG
dyN(cid:19) .
By Lemma 3.3, ord( dyG
dyN
) = ord(Θ1), which gives the claim.
(cid:3)
Proof of Theorem 3.4 continued. We will interpret elements of Θ and Θ♯ not as
derivations, but as elements of the differents (cf. Lemma 3.3). Corollary 3.8, together
with equation (5) shows that there exists an element α ∈ Θ1 such that
αg − α = dg(yG) −
dyG
dyN
d♯
¯g(yN ) = dg(yG) − d♯
¯g(yG).
indk[ε]([dg(yG)]) = [d♯
¯g(yG)] = [dg(yG) − αg + α],
Since
this proves that
and hence the right hand side triangle commutes.
(cid:3)
inf(indk[ε]([dg(yG)])) = [dg(yG)],
4.1. Tangent map.
4. D´evissage
Theorem 4.1. There is a morphism γ (constructed below) such that the following
diagram commutes:
H1(G/N, ΘN )
inf
/ H1(G, Θ)
res
H1(N, Θ)G/N
tg
H2(G/N, ΘN )
inf
/ H2(G, Θ)
H1(G/N, ΘN )
/ H1(G/N, Θ♯)
σ
/ H1(G/N, Θ♯/ ΘN )
∂
/ H2(G/N, ΘN ).
ind
γ
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
12
JAKUB BYSZEWSKI
Proof. The map tg is the trangression and the upper row of this diagram is the
extended inflation-restriction sequence coming from the Hochschild-Serre spectral
sequence in group cohomology [10, Remark following Theorem III.2]. The bottom
row arises from a long exact sequence in cohomology. The short exact sequence
induces a long exact sequence of cohomology groups
0 → Θ → Θ1 → Θ1/ Θ → 0
0 → ΘN → ΘN
1 → (Θ1/ Θ)N → H1(N, Θ) → H1(N, Θ1) → . . . .
Since the map H1(N, Θ) → H1(N, Θ1) is zero (Proposition 3.6), we get a short
exact sequence
0 → ΘN
1 / ΘN → (Θ1/ Θ)N → H1(N, Θ) → 0.
Again, it induces a long exact sequence in cohomology
(8)
0
/ (ΘN
1 / ΘN )G/N
/ (Θ1/ Θ)G
/ H1(N, Θ)G/N
−γ
/ H1(G/N, ΘN
1 / ΘN )
/ H1(G/N, (Θ1/ Θ)N )
−γ
/ . . . ,
where −γ : H1(N, Θ)G/N → H1(G/N, ΘN
to be γ = −(−γ), i.e., γ is to take values opposite to the boundary map.
1 / ΘN ) is the boundary map. We take γ
We now analyse the construction step by step in order to obtain an explicit
definition of the map γ. For a cocycle d : N → Θ, we can find an element α ∈ Θ1
such that ds = αs − α for s ∈ N . If, furthermore, [ds] is G/N -invariant, then the
cocycles (ds) and (dg
g−1sg) differ by a coboundary, i.e., there exists a bg ∈ Θ such
that
(9)
dg
g−1sg = ds + bs
g − bg.
This shows that αg − α − bg is N -invariant and hence αg − α lies in ΘN
we can write
1 + Θ and
αg − α = ag + bg with ag ∈ ΘN
1 , bg ∈ Θ .
The elements ag and bg are well-defined only up to an element of ΘN . Since
ags + bgs = (αs − α)g + (αg − α) = ag
s + bg
s + ag + bg,
and since as ≡ 0 (mod ΘN ), we see that the class of ag in ΘN
1 / ΘN depends only
on the class of g in G/N . Furthermore, by the construction of the boundary map
in (8) we get γ([ds]) = −[a¯g].
If the cocycle (ds) is a restriction of a cocycle d : G → Θ, then in (9) we can take
bg = dg. We then get
γ([ds]) = [dg − αg + α].
This shows that the central square commutes.
By [12, Proposition 1.6.5, and beginning of its proof] we know that we can choose
bg ∈ Θ in (9) in such a way that
(i) bs = ds for s ∈ N ,
(ii) bsg = bs
(iii) bgs = bg
g + bs for s ∈ N and g ∈ G,
s + bg for s ∈ N and g ∈ G.
Then tg([ds]) = [bg
h − bgh + bg] (cf. ibid.). On the other hand γ([ds]) = −[a¯g]. Since
the map H1(G/N, Θ♯/ ΘN ) → H2(G/N, ΘN ) is the boundary map in cohomology,
and since ag + bg = αg − α is a coboundary, we see that the third square also
commutes.
(cid:3)
For future reference, we state explicitly the form of the map γ.
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
DEFORMATION FUNCTORS OF LOCAL ACTIONS
13
Corollary 4.2. In the notation of the proof of Theorem 4.1, we have
γ([ds]) = −[a¯g].
We will now investigate the morphism of functors
Φ = (res, ind) : DG → DG/N
N × DG/N .
Corollary 4.3. We have:
(i) ker Φk[ε] = coker(ΘG
(ii) im Φk[ε] = H1(N, Θ)G/N ×H1(G/N,Θ♯/ ΘN ) H1(G/N, Θ♯).
1 / ΘN )G/N );
1 → (ΘN
Proof. (i) From Theorem 4.1 we see that
ker Φk[ε] = ker(cid:16)H1(G/N, ΘN ) → H1(G/N, ΘN
1 )(cid:17) .
The lower row in the diagram in Theorem 4.1 is a part of a long exact sequence
associated to
0 → ΘN → ΘN
1 → ΘN
1 / ΘN → 0.
This proves that
(ii) The inclusion
ker(cid:16)H1(G/N, ΘN ) → H1(G/N, ΘN
1 )(cid:17) = coker(cid:16)ΘG
1 → (ΘN
1 / ΘN )G/N(cid:17) .
im Φk[ε] ⊆ H1(N, Θ)G/N ×H1(G/N,Θ♯/ ΘN ) H1(G/N, Θ♯)
is trivial. For the other one, choose
(κ, λ) ∈ H1(N, Θ)G/N ×H1(G/N,Θ♯/ ΘN ) H1(G/N, Θ♯).
Then by Theorem 4.1,
tg(κ) = ∂(γ(κ)) = ∂(σ(λ)) = 0,
and hence there is a ζ ∈ H1(G, Θ) such that res(ζ) = κ. We have then σ(ind(ζ)) =
σ(λ), and hence ind(ζ) − λ ∈ ker σ. Hence there is a ξ ∈ H1(G/N, ΘN ) such that
ind(ζ) − λ = ind(inf(ξ)).
Choosing ζ ′ = ζ − inf(ξ), we get Φ(ζ ′) = (κ, λ). This proves the opposite inclusion.
(cid:3)
4.2. Main result. Inspired by Corollary 4.3.ii, we pose the following question.
Question 4.4. Does there exist a pro-representable functor F with the tangent space
H1(G/N, Θ♯/ ΘN ) and with morphisms DG/N
N → F and DG/N → F such that the
morphism Φ maps DG into the fibered product DG/N
N ×F DG/N and such that the
induced morphism
DG → DG/N
N ×F DG/N
is smooth?
Remark 4.5. If the answer to this question is positive, and if the functors DN , DG/N
and F are pro-representable with universal deformation rings RN , RG/N and RF ,
respectively, then the versal deformation ring RG of DG is of the form
RG =(cid:0)((RN )/(G/N ))b⊗RF RG/N(cid:1)[[x1, x2, . . . , xs]],
denotes the completed tensor product.
where RN /(G/N ) denotes the ring of co-invariants (cf. Proposition 2.5) and b⊗
We begin be recalling the definition of an obstruction space in a relative setting,
when a functor is replaced by a morphism of functors (for a general study of these
morphism, cf. [9]).
14
JAKUB BYSZEWSKI
Definition 4.6. Let f : D → E be a morphism of functors D, E : C → Set. An
obstruction space to f is a vector space V over k together with a collection of maps
νe : D(A) ×E(A) E(A′) → V ⊗ I
defined for every small extension e : 0 → I → A′ → A → 0 in C (i.e., a small
surjection A′ → A with kernel I) and satisfying the following condition: For a
morphism e → e′ of small extensions
the induced diagram
0
0
/ I
/ J
/ A′
A
0
/ B′
/ B
/ 0,
D(A) ×E(A) E(A′)
D(B) ×E(B) E(B′)
νe
νe′
V ⊗ I
/ V ⊗ J
commutes.
It is clear that if ξ ∈ D(A) ×E(A) E(A′) lies in the image of the map
D(A′) → D(A) ×E(A) E(A′),
then νe(ξ) = 0.
Definition 4.7. An obstruction space V to a morphism f : D → E of functors
D, E : C → Set is called complete if for every small extension e the following condi-
tion holds: If ξ ∈ D(A) ×E(A) E(A′) is such that νe(ξ) = 0, then ξ lies in the image
of the map
D(A′) → D(A) ×E(A) E(A′).
For E being the one-point functor, we recover the definition of an obstruction
space to D.
Proposition 4.8. Let D, D1, D2, F : C → Set be functors with a commutative
diagram of morphism
D
g
D2
D1
f
/ F.
Assume that F is pro-representable and that the morphism D → D1 ×F D2 is
smooth. Then the tangent space TF to the functor F is an obstruction space to the
morphism Φ : D → D1 × D2 (in the sense of definition 4.6).
Proof. Let e : 0 → I → A′ → A → 0 be a small extension. We should construct a
map
νΦ
e : D(A) ×(D1(A)×D2(A)) (D1(A′) × D2(A′)) → TF ⊗ I.
Given an element
(cid:0)κA, (κ1
A′)(cid:1) ∈ D(A) ×(D1(A)×D2(A)) (D1(A′) × D2(A′)) ,
A′ , κ2
A′ ) and gA′(κ2
the elements fA′(κ1
A′) lie in the same fiber of F (A′) → F (A). Since
F is pro-representable, the fibers are torsors under the action of TF ⊗ I. Thus we
can define
νΦ
e ((cid:0)κA, (κ1
A′, κ2
A′)(cid:1)) = gA′(κ2
A′ ) − fA′(κ1
A′ ) ∈ TF ⊗ I.
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
DEFORMATION FUNCTORS OF LOCAL ACTIONS
15
This provides TF with a structure of an obstruction space. If the obstruction van-
ishes, then (κ1
A′) ∈ D1(A′) ×F (A′) D2(A′), and by smoothness of the map
A′ , κ2
D → D1 ×F D2 we see that(cid:0)κA, (κ1
A′, κ2
A′ )(cid:1) lies in the image of the map
D(A′) → D(A) ×(D1(A)×D2(A)) (D1(A′) × D2(A′)) .
(cid:3)
In the next theorem, we independently verify that the conclusion of Remark 4.8
and D2 = DG/N . This provides some
is true for the functors D = DG, D1 = DG/N
evidence for plausabilty of existence of the functor F .
N
Theorem 4.9. Assume that the functors DN and DG/N are pro-representable.
Then the vector space H1(G/N, Θ♯/ ΘN ) is a complete obstruction space to the
morphism Φ = (res, ind) : DG → DG/N
N × DG/N .
Proof. The proof is quite long, and we will break it in several steps. A part of
the proof is isolated in Lemma 4.11, stated and proven only after the main proof.
Lemma 4.11 needs in turn a certain computation in the Hochshild-Serre spectral
sequence, given in Theorem 5.1 in the appendix.
Let e : 0 → I → A′ → A → 0 be a small extension in C. We will construct a map
νΦ
e : DG(A)×(DG/N
Choose an element
A′ , κG/N
(cid:16)κA, (κN
A′
N (A)×DG/N (A))(cid:16)DG/N
)(cid:17) ∈ DG(A) ×(DG/N
N (A′) × DG/N (A′)(cid:17) → H1(G/N, Θ♯/ ΘN )⊗I.
N (A′) × DG/N (A′)(cid:17) .
N (A)×DG/N (A))(cid:16)DG/N
The deformation κA ∈ DG(A) defines an obstruction class
obs = νe(κA) ∈ H2(G, Θ) ⊗ I.
The class obs0: By the spectral sequence in group cohomology
Epq
2 = Hp(G/N, Hq(N, Θ)) ⇒ Hn(G, Θ),
we know that there exists a filtration 0 = E0 ⊆ E1 ⊆ E2 ⊆ E3 = H2(G, Θ) such
that Ek+1/Ek ≃ Ek,2−k
∞ . By Lemma 4.11 proven below, we see that from the fact
that res(κA) ∈ DG/N
N (A) lifts to A′ we can conclude that the images of obs in
H2(N, Θ) ⊗ I and H1(G/N, H1(N, Θ)) ⊗ I vanish. This shows that the images of
obs in (E3/E2) ⊗ I and (E2/E1) ⊗ I are trivial, thus obs ∈ E1 ⊗ I, and hence there
exists an obs0 ∈ H2(G/N, ΘN ) ⊗ I such that obs = inf(obs0).
Just like for restriction, we also know that ind(κA) ∈ DG/N (A) lifts to A′. We
will now show that the obstruction νe(ind(κA)) to lifting ind(κA) ∈ DG/N (A) to
A′ is equal to the image of obs0 in H2(G/N, Θ♯) ⊗ I, and from this conclude that
The element ind(κA) ∈ DG/N (A) is the image of obs0: Choose a representative
ρA : G → ΓA of κA. Write obs0 as the class obs0 = [η(¯g, ¯h)] of a 2-cocycle
η : G/N × G/N → ΓA′,A ≃ Θ♯ ⊗I.
We can choose the cocycle in such a way that η(id, id) = 0. Since obs = inf(obs0),
there exists a set-theoretic lift ρ∗
A′ : G → ΓA′ of ρA to A′ such that
ρ∗
A′ (g)ρ∗
A′ (h) = η(¯g, ¯h)ρ∗
A′ (gh)
(The obstruction to lifting ρA to A′ is the class of η; we can always modify the
choice of ρ∗
A′ so that it induces a given cocycle in this class.) For such a choice of
a lift, the restriction of ρ∗
A′ to N gives a group homomorphism N → ΓA′ . We can
(10)
obs0 ∈ ker(cid:16)H2(G/N, ΘN ) → H2(G/N, Θ♯)(cid:17) ⊗ I.
16
JAKUB BYSZEWSKI
thus consider the ring of N -invariants A′[[t]]N = A[[yA′]] (cf. Lemma 3.1). Since we
have
ρ∗
A′(s)ρ∗
A′ (g) = ρ∗
A′ (sg) = ρ∗
A′ preserves A′[[t]]N and the morphism it restricts to on
we see that the morphism ρ∗
A′[[t]]N depends only on the class ¯g of g in G/N . We denote the induced map by
A′ (gh)−1 also preserves A′[[t]]N .
A′(¯g)♯ ∈ Γ♯
ρ∗
Furthermore,
A′. We see that η(¯g, ¯h) = ρ∗
g ∈ G, s ∈ N,
A′ (g−1sg)
A′(g)ρ∗
for
A′ (g)ρ∗
A′(h)ρ∗
A′(¯g)♯ρ∗
ρ∗
A′(¯h)♯ = η(¯g, ¯h)♯ρ∗
A′ (gh)♯,
where η(¯g, ¯h)♯ is the restriction of η(¯g, ¯h) to A′[[t]]N . Thus, the obstruction class
νG/N
(ind(κA)) to lifting ind(κA) to A′ is equal the image of obs0 in H2(G/N, Θ♯)⊗I.
e
The class Obs: By (10), we can conclude from Theorem 4.1 that there exists a
class
λ ∈ H1(G/N, Θ♯/ ΘN ) ⊗ I
such that obs0 = ∂λ. Choose a cochain
u : G/N → Θ♯ ⊗I
such that the composite map
¯u : G/N u−→ Θ♯ ⊗I → (Θ♯/ ΘN ) ⊗ I
is a cocycle and λ is the class of ¯u. If necessary, we can modify u in order to get
u(id) = 0.
Recall that we have chosen a lift ρ∗
A′ of ρA to A′ such that
ρ∗
A′ (g)ρ∗
A′ (h) = η(¯g, ¯h)ρ∗
A′ (gh)
and that obs0 = [η(¯g, ¯h)]. We can furthermore assume that η has been chosen in
such a way that
η(¯g, ¯h) = u(¯h)¯g − u(gh) + u(¯g).
Recall that the restriction of ρ∗
[ρ∗
is pro-representable, it makes sense to define
A′ are in the fiber of DG/N
A′] and κN
A′ to N is a group homomorphism, and hence both
A . Since DG/N
N (A) lying over κN
N (A′) → DG/N
N
α = κN
A′ − [ρ∗
A′] ∈ H1(N, Θ)G/N ⊗ I.
The elements r¯g ∈ Θ♯ ⊗I can be also regarded as elements of Γ♯
now the maps r¯g = u(¯g)−1ρ∗
by ¯g 7→ r¯g is a group homomorphism. Indeed, by Lemma 1.3, we have
A′. I claim that the map G/N → Γ#
A′(¯g)♯ ∈ Γ♯
A′/A. Consider
A′ given
r¯gr¯h = u(¯g)−1ρ∗
A′(¯g)♯u(¯h)−1ρ∗
= u(¯g)−1(cid:0)u(¯h)¯g(cid:1)−1
This shows that both [r¯g] and κG/N
κG/N
A . Define
A′
A′ (¯h)♯ = u(¯g)−1(cid:0)u(¯h)¯g(cid:1)−1
A′ (gh)♯ = u(gh)−1ρ∗
η(¯g, ¯h)♯ρ∗
A′ (¯g)♯ρ∗
ρ∗
A′(¯h)♯
A′ (gh)♯ = rgh.
are in the fiber of DG/N (A′) → DG/N (A) over
β = κG/N
A′ − [r¯g] ∈ H1(G/N, Θ♯) ⊗ I.
We are now ready to define the obstruction map. Put
Obs = νΦ
e (cid:16)κA, (κN
A′ , κG/N
A′
)(cid:17) = λ + γ(α) − σ(β) ∈ H1(G/N, Θ♯/ ΘN ) ⊗ I.
We need to verify that the definition of Obs does not depend on the choices
made, i.e., on the choice of:
(i) the representative ρA of the class κA,
(ii) the class λ ∈ H1(G/N, Θ♯/ ΘN ) ⊗ I such that νe(κA) = inf(∂(λ)),
(iii) the map u : G/N → Θ♯ ⊗I such that u(id) = 0 and λ = [¯u¯g],
(iv) the lift ρ∗
A′ of ρA to A′ such that ρ∗
A′ (gh)−1 = ∂u(¯g, ¯h).
A′(h)ρ∗
A′ (g)ρ∗
DEFORMATION FUNCTORS OF LOCAL ACTIONS
17
The class Obs is independent of the choices made in (ii) -- (iv): Let λ, u, ρ∗
A′ be
another choices for (ii) -- (iv), and denote the respective invariants by α and β. Since
A′ and ρ∗
ρ∗
A′ (g) with γg ∈ ΓA′,A.
A′ are both lifts of ρA, we can write ρ∗
A′(g) = γgρ∗
Directly from the definition we see that
(11)
Similarly, we have
(12)
λ − λ = [u¯g] − [u¯g].
α − α = [ρ∗
A′ ] − [ρ∗
A′ ] = −[γs].
We now proceed to compute β − β. The subrings of A′[[t]] of N -invariants with
respect to the two N -actions are, respectively, A′[[yA′]] and A′[[yA′]], where
yA′ = Ys∈N
ρ∗
A′ (s)(t),
ρ∗
A′ (s)(t).
yA′ = Ys∈N
The elements yA′ and yA′ have the same image in A[[t]], and the map τ mapping
yA′ to yA′ gives an isomorphism of A′[[yA′]] and A′[[yA′]] over A[[yA]]. Consider the
following diagram:
A′[[yA′]]
τ
A′[[yA′]]
A′ (¯g)♯
ρ∗
A′ (¯g)♯
ρ∗
A′[[yA′]]
u−1
¯g
A′[[yA′]]
υ¯g
δ¯g
A′[[yA′]]
u−1
¯g
/ A′[[yA′]]
τ
τ
A′[[yA′]]
u−1
¯g
/ A′[[yA′]]
in which all the maps are isomorphisms, and δ¯g and υ¯g are chosen in such a way
the the diagram commutes. Tensoring the diagram with A, we see that δ¯g ⊗A′ A =
∼= Θ♯ ⊗I. It is
υ¯g ⊗A′ A = id. Thus we can think of δ¯g and υ¯g as elements of ΓA′/A
also clear that
β − β = [u−1
¯g ρ∗
A′ (¯g)♯] − [u−1
¯g ρ∗
A′ (¯g)♯] = −[δ¯g].
This gives
(13)
σ( β) − σ(β) = −[δ¯g] = [u¯g] − [u¯g] − [υ¯g].
We need to relate δ to γ and u. Recall ρ∗
with dg ∈ Θ ⊗I. Recall also that we write fg = ρ(g)(t). Note first that we have
A′ (g) and write γg(t) = t + dg(t)
A′ (g) = γgρ∗
yA′ = Ys∈N
= Ys∈N
ρ∗
ρ∗
A′ (s)(t) = Ys∈N
A′ (s)(t) 1 +Xs∈N
A′(s)(t) = Ys∈N
fs ! = yA′ + yXs∈N
ds(fs)
γsρ∗
ρ∗
A′(s) (t + ds(fs))
ds(fs)
fs
.
(In the last term, we write y instead of yA or yA because the sum lies in I, and
hence is annihilated by mA′.) We now look at the top rectangle in the previous
diagram. We have
ρ∗(¯g)♯τ (yA′ ) = ρ∗(¯g)♯(yA′) = Ys∈N
ρ∗
A′(gs)(t) = Ys∈N
γgsρ∗
A′ (gs)(t)
(14)
= Ys∈N
= Ys∈N
ρ∗
A′ (gs) (t + dgs(fgs))
ρ∗
A′ (gs)(t) + ygXs∈N
dgs(fgs)
fgs
.
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
18
JAKUB BYSZEWSKI
Similarly, write υ¯g(yA′ ) = yA′ + w¯g(y), w¯g ∈ Θ♯ ⊗I. Then we have
fgs! .
ρ∗
υ¯gρ∗(¯g)♯(yA′ ) = υ¯g Ys∈N
τ υ¯gρ∗(¯g)♯(yA′ ) = τ Ys∈N
= Ys∈N
= Ys∈N
ρ∗
A′(gs)(t) + w¯g Ys∈N
ρ∗
A′(gs)(t)! = Ys∈N
A′(gs)(t) + w¯g Ys∈N
fgs!!
fgs! +
A′ (gs)(t) + w¯g Ys∈N
ρ∗
dyg
dy
ρ∗
A′ (gs)(t) +
w¯g (y) +
dyg
dy
(yA′ − yA′ )
dyg
dy
yXs∈N
ds(fs)
fs
.
Since υ was chosen in such a way that the diagram commutes, comparing equations
(14) and (15) we get
Now
(15)
(16)
w¯g (y) = yg(cid:18) dyg
dy (cid:19)−1Xs∈N
dgs(fgs)
fgs
− yXs∈N
ds(fs)
fs
.
Recall that we have
ρ∗
A′ (g)ρ∗
ρ∗
A′ (g)ρ∗
A′(h)ρ∗
A′(h)ρ∗
A′ (gh)−1 = ∂u(¯g, ¯h),
A′ (gh)−1 = ∂ u(¯g, ¯h).
Since ρ∗
A′(g) = γgρ∗
A′(g), Lemma 1.3 gives
γgγg
hγ−1
gh = ∂ ¯u(¯g, ¯h) − ∂u(¯g, ¯h).
In particular
and hence
γgs = γgγg
s
for
g ∈ G, s ∈ N,
dgs = dg
s + dg
for
g ∈ G, s ∈ N.
This allows to use Proposition 3.8. Together with equation (16) it shows that there
exists an α ∈ Θ1 such that
αg − α = dg(yG) −
w¯g(y) = dg(yG) − w¯g(yG),
dyG
dy
where yG =Qg∈G fg(t). In particular
αs − α = ds(yG)
for
s ∈ N.
Corollary 4.2 gives then γ([ds(yG)]) = [w¯g(yG)], or in other notation
Combining (11), (12) and (13), this gives
γ([γs]) = [υ ¯g].
λ + γ(α) − σ( β) = λ + γ(α) − σ(β).
and hence the definition of Obs is independent of the choices for (ii)-(iv).
The class Obs is independent of the choice for (i): To prove that Obs is inde-
pendent on the choice made in (i), choose a different representative ρA of κA and
write ρ(g) = χρA(g)χ−1 with χ ∈ ΓA,k. Choose χ′ ∈ ΓA′,k lying over χ. Now make
the following choices:
in (ii) put λ = λ,
in (iii) put u = u,
in (iv) put ρ∗
A′(g) = χ′ρ∗
A′ (g)χ′−1.
It is then clear that
λ = λ,
α = α,
β = β.
DEFORMATION FUNCTORS OF LOCAL ACTIONS
19
This finishes the proof that Obs is well-defined.
Obstruction space: The fact that Obs depends functorially on the extension
e : 0 → I → A′ → A → 0
is obvious from the construction. This proves that H2(G/N, Θ♯/ ΘN ) is an obstruc-
tion space to Φ.
Completeness of the obstruction space: To prove that H2(G/N, Θ♯/ ΘN ) is com-
plete, assume that Obs = 0. Then
and hence by Theorem 4.1,
λ ∈ im γ + im σ
obs = inf(∂(λ)) = 0.
Hence there is no obstruction to lifting ρA to A′ and there exists a group homo-
morphism ρA′ : G → ΓA′ , which is a lift of ρA to A′. Since Obs does not depend on
the choices made in (i) -- (iv), we can make the following choices:
in (ii) put λ = 0,
in (iii) put u = 0,
in (iv) put ρ∗
A′ = ρA′ .
Consider
κ0
A′ = [ρA′ ] ∈ DG(A′).
A′ is a lift of κA to A′ and
Then κ0
α = κN
A′ − res(κ0
A′ ),
β = κG/N
A′ − ind(κ0
A′).
Since γ(α) = σ(β), by Corollary 4.3.ii there exists a ζ ∈ H1(G, Θ) such that
Put κA′ = κ0
A′ + ζ ∈ DG(A′). Then
α = res(ζ),
β = ind(ζ).
res(κA′ ) = res(κ0
A′ ) + res(ζ) = κN
A′ ,
Hence the image of κA′ by the map
ind(κA′ ) = ind(κ0
A′ ) + ind(ζ) = κG/N
A′
.
(cid:3)
DG(A′) → DG(A) ×(cid:16)DG/N
A′ (cid:17)(cid:17). This proves that the obstruction space is complete.
N (A′) × DG/N (A′)(cid:17)
is(cid:16)κA,(cid:16)κN
A′ , κG/N
Remark 4.10. Note that we can recover Theorem 2.8 as a special case of Theorem
4.9. In fact, when the order of G/N is prime to p, the tangent and obstruction
space to DG/N vanishes, and hence DG/N = {∗} is a singleton functor. Similarly,
the obstruction space to the map res: DG → DG/N
vanishes, and hence res is
smooth. From this fact, we conclude as in the proof of Theorem 2.8.
N
Lemma 4.11. Let e : 0 → I → A′ → A → 0 be a small extension in C and let
κ ∈ DG(A). Assume DN is pro-representable. Let
νe(κ) ∈ H2(G, Θ) ⊗ I
N (A) lifts to
N (A′) if and only if the image of νe(κ) vanishes in H2(N, Θ) ⊗ I and in
be an obstruction to lifting κ to A′. Then the image of κ in DG/N
DG/N
H1(G/N, H1(N, Θ)) ⊗ I.
Proof. Choose a representative ρA : G → ΓA of κ ∈ DG(A). The image of νe(κ) in
H2(N, Θ) ⊗ I vanishes if and only if res(κ) ∈ DN (A) admits a lift to DN (A′). We
can thus assume that this condition is satisfied and we can choose a lift ρA′ : N →
ΓA′ and its set-theoretic extension to a map ρ∗
A′ : G → ΓA′ which lifts ρA. The
20
JAKUB BYSZEWSKI
deformation κ′ = [ρA′] ∈ DN (A′) is a lift of res(κ) to A′. The obstruction νe(κ) is
the class of the 2-cocycle η given by
Note that η(s, t) = 0 for s, t ∈ N . We can then compute g∗κ′ as the class of
ρ∗
A′(g)ρ∗
A′ (h) = η(g, h)ρ∗
A′ (gh).
g∗ρA′ = ρ∗
A′ (s).
A′ (g)ρ∗
A′(g−1sg)ρ∗
A′ (g)−1 = η(g, g−1sg)η(s, g)−1ρ∗
This shows that
(17)
g∗κ′ = κ′ + [η(g, g−1sg) − η(s, g)].
Since DN is pro-representable, the fibers of DN (A′) → DN (A) over κ are torsors
N (A′)
under the action of TDN
if and only if there exists a ζ ∈ TDN such that
∼= H1(N, Θ) ⊗ I. Then there is a lift of res(κ) to DG/N
g∗(κ′ − ζ) = κ′ − ζ.
Together with (17) this gives
η(g, g−1sg) − η(s, g) = ζg − ζ.
The claim follows from Theorem 5.1, which is phrased in a more general context in
the next subsection.
(cid:3)
5. Appendix: A map in the Hochschild-Serre spectral sequence
The purpose of this appendix is to provide an explicit formula for a certain
map in the Hochschild-Serre spectral sequence in group cohomology. For lack of a
reference, we present this computation here.
Recall that the Hochschild-Serre spectral sequence arises as the Grothendieck
spectral sequence (cf. [15, Theorem 5.8.3]) associated to the composition of functors
of N - and G/N -invariants
ModG
invN−−−→ ModG/N
invG/N−−−−−→ Ab.
The spectral sequence takes on the form
Hp(G/N, Hq(N, M )) ⇒ Hp+q(G, M ).
For a general reference for spectral sequences, we use [8, Appendix 3].
Theorem 5.1. The map
ker(cid:0) H2(G, M ) → H2(N, M )(cid:1) → H1(G/N, H1(N, M ))
induced from the Hochschild-Serre spectral sequence is given by
[η(g, h)] 7→ ξ¯g(s) = η(s, g) − η(g, g−1sg) + gf (g−1sg) − f (s),
where f : N → M is a cochain such that
η(s, t) = (∂f )(s, t) = sf (t) − f (st) + f (s),
s, t ∈ N.
Proof. Recall that group cohomology can be computed as the cohomology of the
complex HomG(E•, M ), where Ei is the free abelian group with the basis given by
(i + 1)-tuples (g0, . . . , gi) of elements of G. With the G-action given by
g(g0, . . . , gi) = (gg0, . . . , ggi)
the module Ei becomes a free Z[G]-module. The derivation di : Ei → Ei−1 is given
by
di(g0, . . . , gi) =
iXj=0
(−1)j(g0, . . . , gj, . . . , gi).
DEFORMATION FUNCTORS OF LOCAL ACTIONS
21
We will change the notation slightly, replacing the complex E• by an isomorphic
complex F• with less apparent symmetry. Denote by Fi a free Z[G]-module with
basis given by i-tuples [g1, . . . , gi] and define the derivation di : Fi → Fi−1 by
di[g1, . . . , gi] = g1[g2, . . . , gi] +
i−1Xj=1
(−1)j[g0, . . . , gjgj+1, . . . , gi] + (−1)i[g1, . . . , gi−1].
This is an isomorphic complex and the isomorphism is defined on the basis by
[g1, . . . , gi] 7→ (1, g1, g1g2, . . . , g1g2 · · · gi).
We shall call E• and F• the homogenous and the inhomogenous standard complexes,
respectively. When it seems important to denote the group explicitly, we write
E•(G) and F•(G).
Define
Ep,q
0 = HomG(Ep(G/N ), HomN (Eq(G), M )).
This defines a double complex, with total complex T . Considering its vertical fil-
tration, we get a spectral sequence
vertEp,q
2 = Hp(G/N, Hq(N, M )) ⇒ Hp+q(T ).
Considering its horizontal filtration, we also get a spectral sequence
2 = Hp(G/N, Hq(N, M )) ⇒ Hp+q(T ).
Furthermore, the horizontal filtration spectral sequence satisfies
horEp,q
horEp,q
2 = Hq(G, M ) for p = 0,
horEp,q
2 = 0 for p > 1.
This shows that the spectral sequence degenerates on the level of horEp,q
get isomorphisms Hq(G, M ) ∼= Hq(T ). In this way we get a spectral sequence
2
and we
Hp(G/N, Hq(N, M )) ⇒ Hp+q(G, M ),
which is precisely the Hochschild-Serre spectral sequence.
An element a ∈ H2(G, M ) can be written as an element of HomG(E2, M ), namely
as a 2-cocycle η(g, h, k) with values in M . We easily see that the same element of
H2(G, M ) is induced by an element of
E0,2
0 = HomG(E0(G/N ), HomN (E2(G), M ))
given by the map
If a lies in ker(H2(G, M ) → H2(N, M )), then there exists a 1-cocycle f (g, h) ∈
HomN (E1(N ), M ) such that
¯γ 7→(cid:0)(g, h, k) 7→ η(g, h, k)(cid:1).
η(g, h, k) = ∂f (g, h, k) = f (h, k) − f (g, k) + f (g, h).
Choose a section s : G/N → G and put σ(g) = gs(¯g)−1. We can assume that
s(id) = id and hence σ(id) = id. Then σ : G → N is an N -equivariant map. Let b
be the element of E0,1
given by
0
where
¯γ 7→(cid:0)(g, h) 7→ (γξ)(g, h) = γξ(γ−1g, γ−1h)(cid:1)
ξ(g, h) = η(σ(g), g, h) + η(σ(h), σ(g), h) − f (σ(h), σ(g)).
One easily checks directly that dvertb = a. Further, c = dhorb ∈ E1,1
is given by
0
(¯γ, ¯δ) 7→(cid:0)(g, h) 7→ ζ(γ,δ)(g, h) = (δξ)(g, h) − (γξ)(g, h)(cid:1).
22
JAKUB BYSZEWSKI
We are now ready to compute the desired map. The element a induces a class
2 . It also induces a class in the cohomology of the total complex
in H2(G, M ) = E0,2
H2(T ). This class is the same as the class of
a − dtotb = a − dvertb + dhorb = c ∈ E1,1
0 .
Further, the class of c in
is given as the class of the map in
E1,1
2 = H1(G/N, H1(N, M ))
HomG(E1(G/N ), HomN (E1(N ), M ))
given by
(¯γ, ¯δ) 7→(cid:0)(g, h) 7→ ζ(γ,δ)(g, h) = (γξ)(g, h) − (δξ)(g, h)(cid:1).
(Note the restriction from G to N .) Changing the notation from the complex E•
to the (isomorphic) inhomogenous complex F• we get the map
¯δ 7→(cid:0)h 7→ ζδ(h)(cid:1),
with
ζδ(h) = δη(σ(δ−1), δ−1, δ−1h) + δη(σ(δ−1h), σ(δ−1), δ−1h) − δf (σ(δ−1h), σ(δ−1))
−η(σ(id), id, h) − η(σ(h), σ(id), h) + f (σ(h), σ(id)).
We preserve the notation η(g, h) and f (h) also for the associated inhomogenous
cochains. In this notation, we get
ζδ(h) =δσ(δ−1)η(σ(δ−1)−1δ−1, h) + δσ(δ−1h)η(σ(δ−1h)−1σ(δ−1), σ(δ−1)−1δ−1h)
− δσ(δ−1h)f ((σ(δ−1h))−1σ(δ−1)) − η(id, h) − hη(h−1, h) + hf (h−1).
The map does not depend on the choice of a representative of δ. Thus we can
assume that σ(δ−1) = id. It follows that σ(δ−1h) = δ−1hδ and the map takes the
form
(18)
ζδ(h) = δη(δ−1, h) + hδη(δ−1h−1δ, δ−1h) − hδf (δ−1h−1δ)
−η(id, h) − hη(h−1, h) + hf (h−1).
Applying the 2-cocycle equation
gη(h, k) − η(gh, k) + η(g, hk) − η(g, h) = 0,
g, h, k ∈ G
to the triples (g, h, k) equal to
(δ, δ−1, h), (hδ, δ−1h−1δ, δ−1h), (δ, δ−1hδ, δ−1h−1δ), (h, δ, δ−1), (δ, id, id),
we get the following equations:
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
δη(δ−1, h) − η(id, h) + η(δ, δ−1h) − η(δ, δ−1) = 0
hδη(δ−1h−1δ, δ−1h) − η(δ, δ−1h) + η(hδ, δ−1) − η(hδ, δ−1h−1δ) = 0
δη(δ−1hδ, δ−1h−1δ) − η(hδ, δ−1h−1δ) + η(δ, id) − η(δ, δ−1hδ) = 0
hη(δ, δ−1) − η(hδ, δ−1) + η(h, id) − η(h, δ) = 0
δη(id, id) − η(δ, id) = 0.
Adding equations (19), (20) and (22) and subtracting equations (21) and (23) we
get
δη(δ−1, h) + hδη(δ−1hδ,δ−1h) = δη(δ−1hδ, δ−1h−1δ) − η(δ, δ−1hδ) + δη(id, id)
+ η(id, h) + η(δ, δ−1) − hη(δ, δ−1) − η(h, id) + η(h, δ).
Together with equation (18), this gives
ζδ(h) = η(h, δ) − η(δ, δ−1hδ) + η(δ, δ−1) − hη(δ, δ−1) + δf (δ−1hδ) − f (h).
DEFORMATION FUNCTORS OF LOCAL ACTIONS
23
Passing to cohomology, one sees that this gives precisely the map stated in the
claim.
(cid:3)
References
[1] Jos´e Bertin, S. Maugeais, D´eformations ´equivariantes des courbes semistables, Annales de
L'Institut Fourier 55 (2005), no. 6, pp. 1905 -- 1941.
[2] Jos´e Bertin, Ariane M´ezard, D´eformations formelles des revetements sauvagement ramifi´es
de courbes alg´ebriques, Invent. Math. 141 (2000), no. 1, pp. 195 -- 238.
[3] Jos´e Bertin, Ariane M´ezard, Problem of formation of quotients and base change, Manuscripta
Math. 115 (2004), no. 4, pp. 467 -- 487.
[4] Jakub Byszewski, Gunther Cornelissen, Which weakly ramified group actions admit a uni-
versal formal deformation?, Annales de L'Institut Fourier 59 (2009) no. 3, pp. 877 -- 902.
[5] J. Byszewski, Gunther Cornelissen, Fumiharu Kato, Un anneau de deformation universel en
conducteur superieur, submitted for publication, arxiv.org/abs/0910.2557.
[6] Ted Chinburg, Robert Guralnick, David Harbater, Oort groups and lifting problems, Compos.
Math. 144 (2008), no. 4, pp. 849 -- 866.
[7] Gunther Cornelissen, Fumiharu Kato, Equivariant deformation of Mumford curves and of
ordinary curves in positive characteristic, Duke Math. J. 116 (2003), no. 3, pp. 431 -- 470.
[8] David Eisenbud, Commutative algebra with a view toward algebraic geometry, Graduate Texts
in Mathematics 150, Springer-Verlag, 2004.
[9] Barbara Fantechi, Marco Manetti, Obstruction calculus of functors of Artin rings, I, Journal
of Algebra 202 (1998), no. 2, pp. 541 -- 576.
[10] Gerhard Hochschild, Jean-Pierre Serre, Cohomology of group extensions, Trans. Amer. Math.
Soc. 74 (1953), pp. 110 -- 134.
[11] Sh¯oichi Nakajima, p-ranks and automorphism groups of algebraic curves, Trans. Amer. Math.
Soc. 303 (1987), no. 2, pp. 595 -- 607.
[12] Jurgen Neukirch, Alexander Schmidt, Kay Wingberg, Cohomology of number fields,
Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften 323, Springer-Verlag, 2000.
[13] Michael Schlessinger, Functors of Artin rings, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 130 (1968), pp. 208 --
222.
[14] Jean-Pierre Serre, Corps locaux, Hermann, 1968.
[15] Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Cambridge University Press,
1995.
Instytut Matematyki Uniwersytetu Jagiello´nskiego, ul. Lojasiewicza 6, 30-348 Krak´ow,
Poland
E-mail address: [email protected]
|
1608.03977 | 2 | 1608 | 2019-09-19T17:14:50 | Finite group actions on moduli spaces of vector bundles | [
"math.AG",
"math.DG"
] | We study actions of finite groups on moduli spaces of stable holomorphic vector bundles and relate the fixed-point sets of those actions to representation varieties of certain orbifold fundamental groups. | math.AG | math |
FINITE GROUP ACTIONS ON MODULI SPACES OF
VECTOR BUNDLES
FLORENT SCHAFFHAUSER
Abstract. We study actions of finite groups on moduli spaces of stable holo-
morphic vector bundles and relate the fixed-point sets of those actions to rep-
resentation varieties of orbifold fundamental groups.
Contents
1. Automorphisms of the moduli space
2. Modular interpretation of the fixed-point set
3. Representations of orbifold fundamental groups
References
1
8
18
23
Let X be a compact connected Riemann surface of genus g ≥ 2. The goal of
the paper is to study certain finite group actions on moduli spaces of stable vector
bundles over X, equipped with their standard complex analytic structure ([NS64,
NS65]), where by automorphism of such a moduli space, we mean a transformation
that is either holomorphic or anti-holomorphic.
In Section 1, we show how such actions arise naturally from groups of holomor-
phic and anti-holomorphic transformations of X and we describe these actions from
three different points of view: algebro-geometric, gauge-theoretic, and via the fun-
damental group of X. Then, in Section 2, we dig deeper into the gauge-theoretic
picture in order to interpret the fixed points of the actions constructed earlier in
terms of moduli of certain vector bundles with extra structure. Finally, in Section
3, we relate those vector bundles with extra structure to unitary representations of
orbifold fundamental groups.
1. Automorphisms of the moduli space
1.1. The algebro-geometric picture. Let X be a compact connected Riemann
surface of genus g ≥ 2. A holomorphic vector bundle E over X is called stable if, for
Date: September 20, 2019.
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 14H60,14H30.
Key words and phrases. Vector bundles on curves and their moduli,Fundamental groups.
The author acknowledges the support of U.S. National Science Foundation grants DMS
1107452, 1107263, 1107367 "RNMS: Geometric structures And Representation varieties" (the
GEAR Network). Thanks go to Victoria Hoskins for helpful discussions on quiver varieties ana-
logues of the topics covered in this paper.
1
2
FLORENT SCHAFFHAUSER
all non-trivial holomorphic sub-bundle F ⊂ E, one has deg(F ∗⊗E) > 0 (semistabil-
ity is defined using a large inequality instead). Rank r vector bundles are topolog-
ically classified by their degree d ∈ H 2(X; π1(GL(r; C))) ≃ π1(GL(r; C)) ≃ Z and,
by a theorem due to Mumford ([Mum63]), the set MX (r, d), consisting of isomor-
phism classes of stable holomorphic vector bundles and degree d admits a natural
structure of non-singular quasi-projective variety of dimension r2(g − 1) + 1. An
important property of stable holomorphic vector bundles is that they are simple
(they only admit those automorphisms that come from the centre of the struc-
ture group). As a matter of fact, much of what we shall say in this paper ex-
tends to moduli spaces of simple and stable principal holomorphic GC-bundles of
fixed topological type d ∈ H 2(X; π1(GC)) ≃ π1(GC), for GC a (connected) reduc-
tive complex Lie group. Such moduli spaces exist ([Ram75]) and have dimension
dim GC (g− 1) + dimZ(GC), where Z(GC) is the centre of GC. This suggests adopt-
ing the following notation for the remainder of this section: GC := GL(r; C) and
MX(GC, d) := MX (r, d).
principle be induced by two different types of transformations:
Our goal is now to define finite group actions on MX (GC, d). These could in
(1) either holomorphic or anti-holomorphic transformations of the complex Lie
group GC;
(2) either holomorphic or anti-holomorphic transformations of the Riemann
surface X.
Indeed, if E is a bundle represented by a holomorphic 1-cocycle gij : Ui ∩ Uj −→
GC, u ∈ Aut(GC) is a group automorphism and σ : X −→ X is an automorphism of
X, we can form the 1-cocycle u ◦ gij ◦ σ−1 : σ(Ui) ∩ σ(Uj ) −→ GL(r; C). The issue
is that we need to guarantee that u ◦ gij ◦ σ−1 is still holomorphic, so we have to
impose that u and σ be both holomorphic or both anti-holomorphic. In the present
paper, we will achieve that for the following class of examples. Let Aut±(X) be
the group of either holomorphic or anti-holomorphic bijective transformations of
X. Then there is a short exact sequence
(1.1)
1 −→ Aut(X) −→ Aut±(X) −→ Z/2Z −→ 1
whose kernel consists of holomorphic automorphisms of X (a splitting of (1.1) is
equivalent to an anti-holomorphic involution of X; it may or not exist). Since g ≥ 2
by assumption, Aut±(X) is a finite group of order no greater than 168(g−1). Let Σ
be a subgroup of Aut±(X) and denote by ε : Σ −→ Z/2Z the group homomorphism
induced by (1.1):
ε(σ) =(cid:26) +1
−1
if σ : X −→ X is holomorphic,
if σ : X −→ X is anti − holomorphic.
(1.2)
(1.3)
Let now θ : GC −→ GC be an anti-holomorphic, involutive group homomorphism.
This induces an action of Σ on GC, defined by
θσ :=(cid:26) IdGC
θ
if ε(σ) = +1,
if ε(σ) = −1.
Thus, for all σ ∈ Σ and (gij )(i,j) a holomorphic 1-cocycle on X representing a
GC-bundle E, we can define σ(E) to be the GC-bundle defined by the holomorphic
1-cocycle
(1.4)
σ(gij ) := θσ ◦ gij ◦ σ−1.
FINITE GROUP ACTIONS ON MODULI SPACES OF VECTOR BUNDLES
3
The real form θ of GC = GL(r; C) that will be most important to us is θ : g −→ g,
because then the standard action of GC = GL(r; C) on Cr is a real action: gv = g v.
Then we have:
(1.5)
σ(gij ) =(cid:26) gij ◦ σ−1
gij ◦ σ−1
if ε(σ) = +1,
if ε(σ) = −1.
In particular, if (gij)(i,j) is a cocycle representing the vector bundle E, then the
vector bundle σ(E) defined by σ(gij) is isomorphic to (σ−1)∗E if σ is holomorphic
and to (σ−1)∗E is σ is anti-holomorphic, which readily implies the next result.
Proposition 1.1. Let E be a holomorphic vector bundle on X and consider σ ∈
Σ ⊂ Aut±(X). Then the holomorphic vector bundle σ(E) defined by the Σ-action
(1.5) is stable if and only if E is stable Moreover, there is an induced a Σ-action on
each of the moduli spaces MX (r, d), for all (r, d).
Proof. For holomorphic vector bundles, both properties follow from the fact that
deg(σ(E)) = deg E when Σ acts as described in (1.5).
(cid:3)
Note that it is not true in general that there is an induced Σ-action on ev-
ery moduli space MX(GC, d). For instance, if θ(g) = (gt)−1 on GL(r; C), then
deg(σ(E)) = −deg E, so only the moduli space MX (GC, 0) will be preserved by the
induced Σ-action.
1.2. The gauge-theoretic picture. The Narasimhan-Seshadri theorem ([NS65,
Don83]) provides a diffeomorphism between the moduli space MX (r, d) of stable
holomorphic vector bundles of rank r and degree d over X and the space, to be
denoted by F −1({ d
r})irr/GE, constisting of gauge equivalence classes of projectively
flat, irreducible unitary connections on a fixed Hermitian vector bundle E over X,
of rank r and degree d. Here, by GE, we denote the unitary gauge group of the
Hermitian vector bundle E and by F the map taking a unitary connection A on
E to its curvature form F (A), which is a differential 2-form on E with values in
the bundle of anti-Hermitian endomorphisms of E.
If we use a compatible Rie-
mannian metric of volume 2π on X and replace anti-Hermitian endomorphisms by
Hermitian ones (using multiplication by √−1), we have indeed that projectively flat
connections are those connections that satisfy F (A) = d
r IdE, hence our notation
above. A unitary connection A on E is called irreducible if there is no non-trivial
sub-bundle F ⊂ E whose sections are preserved by the covariant derivative associ-
ated to A. Equivalently, there is no direct sum decomposition E ≃ E1 ⊕ E2 such
that A = A1 ⊕ A2. Or yet again, the stabiliser of A in GE is equal to the centre
Z(GE) ≃ Z(U(r)) ≃ S1 of the gauge group GE.
Let us now assume that the Σ-action on X lifts to E, i.e. that there exists a
family (τσ)σ∈Σ of (normalised) bundle isometries from E to itself satisfying the
conditions:
(1) For all σ ∈ Σ, we have a commutative diagram
E
y
X
τσ−−−−→ E
σ−−−−→ X
y
4
FLORENT SCHAFFHAUSER
(2) If σ : X −→ X is holomorphic, the map τσ : E −→ E is fibrewise C-
linear. If σ :−→ X is anti-holomorphic, the map τσ : E −→ E is fibrewise
C-anti-linear.
(3) τ1Σ = IdE and, for all (σ1, σ2) ∈ Σ × Σ, τσ1σ2 = τσ1 τσ2 . In particular, for
all σ, τσ is invertible and τ −1
σ = τσ−1 .
This is equivalent to asking that there exists a family (ϕσ)σ∈E of (normalised)
isomorphisms satisfying the conditions:
(1) For all σ ∈ Σ, we have a commutative diagram
σ(E)
!❉❉❉❉❉❉❉❉
ϕσ
X
E
⑧⑧⑧⑧⑧⑧⑧⑧
(2) The map ϕσ : σ(E) −→ E is fibrewise C-linear.
(3) ϕ1σ = IdE and, for all (σ1, σ2) ∈ Σ× Σ, ϕσ1σ2 = ϕσ1 σ1(ϕσ2 ). In particular,
for all σ, ϕσ is an isomorphism and ϕ−1
σ = σ(ϕσ−1 ).
βσ(A) := (ϕ−1
σ )∗(cid:0)σ(A)(cid:1).
Given an element σ ∈ Σ and a unitary connection A on E, we denote by σ(A) the
induced connection on σ(E), where σ(E) is the Hermitian vector bundle defined as
in (1.4), except that we are now working in the C∞ category. Using the isomorphism
ϕσ : σ(E) −→ E, we can then define
(1.6)
Proposition 1.2. The map σ 7−→ βσ induced by (1.6) defines a Σ-action on the
space AE of unitary connections on E.
Proof. One has, for all (σ1, σ2) ∈ Σ × Σ,
σ1σ2 )∗(cid:0)(σ1σ2)(A)(cid:1)
σ1σ2 (A) = (ϕ−1
βτ
= (cid:0)σ1(ϕ−1
σ1 )∗(cid:0)σ1((ϕ−1
σ1 ◦ βτ
σ1(cid:1)∗(cid:0)σ1(σ2(A))(cid:1)
σ2 )∗σ2(A))(cid:1)
= (ϕ−1
= (βτ
σ2 )ϕ−1
σ2 )(A),
which proves the proposition.
(cid:3)
Since Z(GE) ≃ Z(U(r)) acts trivially on AE, we can actually relax Condition (3)
in the definitions of the families (τσ)σ∈Σ and (ϕσ)σ∈Σ and still obtain Proposition
1.2. Indeed, if c : Σ × Σ −→ Z(U(r)) is any (normalised) 2-cocycle, one need only
ask
(3′) τσ1 τσ2 = c(σ1, σ2)τσ1σ2
or equivalently, ϕσ1 σ1(ϕσ2 ) = c(σ1, σ2)ϕσ1σ2 , because then, in the proof of Propo-
sition 1.2, one obtains
βτ
σ1σ2 (A) =(cid:0)c(σ1, σ2)(cid:1)∗(cid:0)βτ
σ1 ◦ βτ
σ2(cid:1)(A) = (βτ
σ1 ◦ βτ
σ2 )(A),
since c(σ1, σ2) ∈ Z(U(r)) and Z(U(r)) acts trivially on AE. This motivates the
following definition.
Definition 1.3. Given a 2-cocycle c : Σ×Σ −→ Z(U(r)), a c-equivariant structure
on the Hermitian vector bundle E is a family (τσ)σ∈Σ of maps τσ : E −→ E
satisfying Conditions (1), (2) and (3') above.
/
/
!
FINITE GROUP ACTIONS ON MODULI SPACES OF VECTOR BUNDLES
5
When c is the trivial cocycle, a c-equivariant structure will be called just an equi-
variant structure (the resulting notion of equivariant bundle was already studied in
[AG06], for the case of holomorphic transformations on X). The issue is then to
check that the Σ-action on AE defined in (1.6), which depends on the c-equivariant
structure (τσ)σ∈Σ on E, induces a Σ-action on F −1({ d
r})irr/GE. When d = 0, this
is a consequence of the following general framework for (Σ,GE)-compatible group
actions on Hamiltonian spaces:
(1.7)
(1) There is a Σ-action on GE, defined for σ ∈ Σ by
σ (cid:1)∗(cid:0)σ(g)(cid:1),
σ =(cid:0)ϕ−1
ατ
σ(g) = τσgτ −1
which is compatible with the Σ-action on AE defined in (1.6) in the sense
that
(1.8)
βτ
σ(g · A) = ατ
σ(g) · βτ
σ(A).
Note that, in order to define the Σ-action on the gauge group GE by ατ
σ
by the expression (1.7), one implicitly uses the Σ-action on the structure
group GC defined in (1.3): the real form θ : GC −→ GC is hidden in the
notation σ(g) for the gauge transformation of σ(E) induced by the gauge
transformation g of E.
(2) The Σ-action on GE defined above induces a Σ-action on the dual of the
Lie algebra of GE, which is where the (GE-equivariant) momentum map F
for the GE-action on AE takes its values ([AB83]). If we still denote by ατ
σ
this induced action, we have the following compatibility relation between
the Σ-action on AE and the momentum map F :
σ(cid:0)F (A)(cid:1).
σ(A)(cid:1) = ατ
F(cid:0)βτ
Proposition 1.4. The Σ-action on AE defined in (1.6) induces a Σ-action on the
Hamiltonian reduction F −1({0})irr/GE.
Proof. By Condition (1), the stabiliser of βτ
σ(StabGE (A)).
Since Σ acts on GE by group automorphisms, it preserves the centre of GE and,
consequently, the space of irreducible connections. By Condition (2), if A is a
flat unitary connection, the curvature of βτ
σ(F (A)), which is 0 because Σ
acts linearly on the Lie algebra of GE. In particular, the Σ-action preserves the
space of flat connections in AE. Condition (1) then ensures that the Σ-action on
F −1({0})irr = F −1({0}) ∩ (AE)irr descends to F −1({0})irr/GE.
σ(A) in AE is equal to ατ
σ(A) is ατ
(cid:3)
To see that Proposition 1.4 remains true when d 6= 0, we need to use special
properties of the involution θ on GC: since we have chosen θ to be the split real
form of GC = GL(r; C), the induced involution on the Lie algebra of u(r) restricts
to ξ 7−→ −ξ on the centre of u(r). Therefore, the induced Σ-action on Lie(GE)
fixes the element i d
r IdE and we can shift the momentum map by such an element
and reduce the d 6= 0 case to the d = 0 case. This shows, as in Proposition 1.1,
the importance of working with the split real form θ of GC in order to obtain a
Σ-action on each of the moduli spaces MX (GC, d), for all d ∈ π1(GC).
To conclude the present subsection, recall that unitary connections on E are in
bijective correspondence with holomorphic structures on that bundle. More pre-
cisely, to each unitary connection A on E there is associated a Dolbeault operator
∂A on E whose kernel defines a locally free sheaf of rank r over the sheaf of holo-
morphic functions on X, which in turn defines a holomorphic vector bundle E. It
6
FLORENT SCHAFFHAUSER
can then be checked (see for instance [Sch12] for the case where Σ ≃ Z/2Z acts
on X via an anti-holomorphic involution σ) that the holomorphic vector bundle
σ(E) defined in (1.5) is the holomorphic vector bundle associated to the unitary
connection βτ
σ(A) defined in (1.6). Since σ(E) does not depend on the choice of
a background Hermitian bundle E with a c-equivariant structure (τσ)σ∈Σ, the Σ-
action on F −1({0})irr/GE defined in Proposition 1.4 always corresponds, under the
Narasimhan-Seshadri diffeomorphism F −1({0})irr/GE ≃ MX (r, 0) to the canoni-
cal Σ-action E 7−→ σ(E). In particular, the Σ-action induced on the Hamitlonian
quotient F −1({0})irr/GE is independent of the choice of the c-equivariant structure
(τσ)σ∈Σ and also of the choice of the cocycle c, as we shall now prove directly.
Proposition 1.5. We have the following results:
σ)σ∈Σ and (γσ)σ∈Σ. Then (βτ
(1) Fix a 2-cocycle c ∈ Z 2(Σ;Z(U(r))) and let (ϕσ)σ∈Σ and (ψσ)σ∈Σ be any
two c-equivariant structures on E, the two induced Σ-actions on AE being
respectively denoted by (βτ
σ)σ∈Σ and (γσ)σ∈Σ
induce the same Σ-action on F −1({ d
equivariant structure on E and let (ϕ′
E. The two induced Σ-actions on AE are respectively denoted by (βτ
and (βτ,u
F −1({ d
r})/GE.
(2) Let c and c′ be two 2-cocycles Σ × Σ −→ Z(U(r)). Let (ϕσ)σ∈Σ be a c-
σ)σ∈Σ be a c′-equivariant structure on
σ)σ∈Σ
σ )σ∈Σ induce the same Σ-action on
σ )σ∈Σ. Then (βτ
r})/GE.
σ)σ∈Σ and (βτ,u
Proof. Recall that we have denoted by (ατ
σ)σ∈Σ the Σ-action on GE induced by
the the choices of a cocycle c and a c-equivariant structure (ϕσ)σ∈Σ: for all σ ∈ Σ
σ(g) = ϕσσ(g)ϕ−1
and all g ∈ GE, ατ
σ . Recall also the compatibility relation (1.8)
σ and βτ
between ατ
σ.
γσ(A) = (ψ−1
Then one has, for all σ ∈ Σ and all A ∈ AE,
(1) Given σ ∈ Σ, let us consider the gauge transformation uσ := ψσϕ−1
σ )∗σ(A)(cid:1) = uσ · βτ
σ )∗σ(A) = (ϕ−1
σ)σ∈Σ and (γσ)σ∈Σ indeed induce the same Σ-action on F −1({ d
σ )∗(cid:0)(ϕ−1
σ )∗σ(A) = (u−1
(2) The proof is the same as (1), setting now uσ := ϕ′
σ u−1
so (βτ
σ ∈ GE.
σ(A),
r})/GE.
(cid:3)
σϕ−1
σ ∈ GE.
Note that a difference between (1) and (2) in the above proof is that in (1) we
have uσ1σ2 = uσ1ατ
σ1 (uσ2) (as seen by a direct computation), while in (2) we have
uσ1σ2 = c(σ1, σ2)c′(σ1, σ2)−1uσ1ατ
σ1 (uσ2 ). In particular, if the cocycles c and c′ are
cohomologous, i.e. if there exists a (normalised) map a : Σ −→ Z(U(r)) such that,
for all (σ1, σ2) ∈ Σ × Σ, c(σ1, σ2)c′(σ1, σ2)−1 = aσ1 σ1(aσ2 )a−1
σ1σ2 , then the family
(hσ := aσuσ)σ∈Σ satisfies hσ1σ2 = hσ1 ατ
σ1 (hσ2 ), meaning that in this case we can
actually modify the (gσ)σ∈Σ for the cocycle relation to hold, without modifying the
way these gauge transformations act on AE.
1.3. Representations of the fundamental group. Let x be a point in X and
let π1(X; x) be the fundamental group of X at that point. For stable holomorphic
vector bundles of degree 0, the diffeomorphism MX(r, 0) ≃ F −1({0})irr/GE also
reads
MX (r, 0) ≃ Hom(π1(X; x); U(r))irr/U(r) .
Explicitly, given a representation of π1(X; x) into the maximal compact subgroup
K := U(r) of GC = GL(r; C), there is a natural π1(X; x)-action on the product
FINITE GROUP ACTIONS ON MODULI SPACES OF VECTOR BUNDLES
7
bundle eXx × Cr of the universal covering space eXx of X (canonically determined
by the choice of the base point x) with the vector space Cr: for all γ ∈ π1(X; x),
all ξ ∈ eXx and all v ∈ Cr,
γ · (ξ, v) := (γ · ξ, (γ) · v),
where π1(X; x) acts on π1(X; x) in the canonical way and on Cr via the representa-
tion . If : π1(X; x) −→ U(r) is irreducible (meaning that there is no non-trivial
sub-space W ⊂ Cr invariant under all transformations in Im , or equivalently that
is not the direct sum of two unitary representations, or yet again that the sta-
biliser of in U(r) is reduced to Z(U(r)) ≃ S1), then the induced rank r vector
bundle
E := (eXx × Cr)/π1(X; x)
over X is stable, of degree 0. Conversely, any such bundle comes in that way from
an irreducible unitary representation of π1(X; x) ([NS65]).
Recall from Section 1.1 that Σ ⊂ Aut±(X) is a finite group which also acts on
GC via the group homomorphism ε : Σ −→ Z/2Z constructed in (1.2) and the
anti-holomorphic involution θ of GC. Conjugating θ by an inner automorphism of
GC if necessary, we can assume that θ preserves the maximal compact subgroup K
of GC. Therefore, there is an induced group homomorphism
Σ −→ Out(K) × Out(π1(X; x)),
where Out(H) := Aut(H)/Int(H) denotes the outer automorphism group of a given
group H. Note that, since X is compact connected of genus g ≥ 2, we can identify
Out(π1(X; x)) with the mapping class group of X and then the homomorphism
Σ −→ Out(π1(X; x)) just takes a transformation σ : X −→ X to its mapping
class. Since moreover Out(K) × Out(π1(X; x)) acts on the representation space
Hom(π1(X; x); K)irr/K via
([ψ], [f ]) · [] := [ψ ◦ ◦ f −1],
where we identify π1(X; f (x)) and π1(X; x) via the choice of a path from x to
f (x). Consequently, there is an induced Σ-action on the representation space
Hom(π1(X; x); K)irr/K, defined by
σ · [] := [θσ ◦ ◦ σ−1] =: [σ()].
In particular, the holomorphic vector bundle Eσ() is isomorphic to σ(E).
To sum up, we have three ways of thinking about the moduli space MX (r, 0):
(1) the space of isomorphism classes of stable holomorphic vector bundles of
rank r and degree 0 over X;
(2) the space of gauge orbits of irreducible unitary connections on a fixed Her-
mitian vector bundle of rank r and degree 0 over X;
(3) the space of irreducible representations π1(X; x) −→ U(r).
Then, given a finite group Σ ⊂ Aut±(X) of either holomorphic or anti-holomorphic
transformations of X, there is an induced Σ-action on MX(r, 0) that we can de-
scribe in each of the three pictures above (which amounts to saying that the known
diffeomorphisms between those three spaces are Σ-equivariant). Perhaps notewor-
thy is the fact that it is slightly more involved to define the induced Σ-action on the
space F −1({0})irr/GE than in the other two models of MX (r, 0), because it involves
a choice of an extra structure, namely a c-equivariant structure on E (Definition
1.3) in order to define the induced action on the moduli space, making it necessary
8
FLORENT SCHAFFHAUSER
to check that this action is independent of that choice. This might be seen as a
drawback at first but, as we shall see in the next two sections, it holds the key to
two important things:
(1) the modular interpretation of Σ-fixed points in MX(r, 0);
(2) the Narasimhan-Seshadri correspondence in this context.
A further application of the gauge-theoretic point of view would be the study of
the topology of that fixed-point set but we shall not pursue this here.
2. Modular interpretation of the fixed-point set
2.1. Equivariant structures on holomorphic vector bundles. As mentioned
at the end of Section 1.3, the gauge-theoretic perspective on finite group actions on
moduli spaces of stable holomorphic vector bundles holds the key to the modular
interpretation of the fixed points of such an action.
Indeed, we will now equip
holomorphic vector bundles with generalised equivariant structures that mirror, in
the holomorphic category, the c-equivariant structures introduced in Definition 1.3.
Definition 2.1. Let X be a Riemann surface equipped with a finite group action
of Σ ⊂ Aut±(X). Let E be a holomorphic vector bundle over X and fix a group
2-cocycle c : Σ × Σ −→ C∗ ⊂ Aut(E). A c-equivariant structure on E is a family
(τσ)σ∈Σ of bundle maps from E to itself satisfying the conditions:
(1) For all σ ∈ Σ, we have a commutative diagram
E
y
X
τσ−−−−→ E
σ−−−−→ X
y
(2) If σ : X −→ X is holomorphic, the map τσ : E −→ E is holomorphic and
fibrewise C-linear. If σ :−→ X is anti-holomorphic, the map τσ : E −→ E
is anti-holomorphic and fibrewise C-anti-linear.
(3) τ1Σ = IdE and, for all (σ1, σ2) ∈ Σ × Σ, τσ1 τσ2 = c(σ1, σ2)τσ1σ2 .
A pair (E, (τσ)σ∈Σ) where E is a holomorphic vector bundle and (τσ)σ∈Σ is a c-
equivariant structure on E will be called a c-equivariant holomorphic vector bun-
dle. A homomorphism between two c-equivariant vector bundles (E, (τσ)σ∈Σ) and
(E ′, (τ ′
σ)σ∈Σ) (for the same cocycle c) is a homomorphism of holomorphic vector
bundles f : E −→ E ′ over X such that, for all σ ∈ Σ, f ◦ τσ = τ ′
σ ◦ f .
Recall that when c is the trivial cocycle, a c-equivariant structure is just a lifting
of the Σ-action on X to a Σ-action on E. Also, Definition 2.1 is equivalent to
asking that there exist a family (ϕσ)σ∈E of (normalised) isomorphisms satisfying
the conditions:
(1) For all σ ∈ Σ, we have a commutative diagram
σ(E)
!❈❈❈❈❈❈❈❈
ϕσ
X
E
(2) The map ϕσ : σ(E) −→ E is holomorphic and fibrewise C-linear.
(3) ϕ1σ = IdE and, for all (σ1, σ2) ∈ Σ × Σ, ϕσ1 σ1(ϕσ2 ) = c(σ1, σ2)ϕσ1σ2 .
/
/
!
FINITE GROUP ACTIONS ON MODULI SPACES OF VECTOR BUNDLES
9
When c is the trivial cocycle, this should really be thought of as a descent datum:
it is a necessary and sufficient condition for the holomorphic vector bundle E to
descend to a vector bundle in the appropriate category over the orbifold [X/Σ].
Stability of a c-equivariant holomorphic vector bundle (E, τ := (τσ)σ∈Σ) may be
defined in the usual way, with respect to non-trivial τ -invariant sub-bundles only.
This is in general not equivalent to the underlying holomorphic vector bundle E
being stable (see [Ram81] for the case of a holomorphic involution and [Sch12] for
the case of an anti-holomorphic one). But this is actually a good thing because
it gives us enough stable objects for the Seshadri theorem ([Ses67]) to hold: any
semi-stable object admits filtrations by τ -invariants sub-objects whose successive
quotients are stable (in the weaker, τ -relative, sense, but in general not in the
strong sense of the underlying bundle being stable) and of equal slope. This is
however not something that we will pursue in this paper (see [Sch12] for the special
case of anti-holomorphic involutions). Instead, as in [HN75], we shall focus on the
following family of objects.
Definition 2.2. A c-equivariant holomorphic vector bundle (E, (τσ)σ∈Σ) is called
geometrically stable if the underlying vector bundle E is stable in the usual sense.
It is called polystable if it is a direct sum of geometrically stable c-equivariant
holomorphic vector bundles of equal slope.
The rest of Section 2 is devoted to proving the existence of geometrically stable
c-equivariant vector bundles and constructing connected (gauge-theoretic) moduli
spaces for such objects.
2.2. Invariant connections. We saw in Section 1.2 that, given a c-equivariant
Hermitian vector bundle E over (X, Σ), there was a Σ-action on the space AE
of unitary connections on E, that was induced by the Σ-action on X (Proposition
1.2). That Σ-action on AE was compatible with the Hamiltonian action of the gauge
group GE in the sense of Property (1.8) and with the momentum map F of that
action. Back in Section 1.2, this was only used to deduce that there was an induced
Σ-action on F −1({0})irr/GE, or more generally on F −1({ d
r})/GE (Proposition 1.4).
One can be slightly more general if one allows holomorphic principal GC-bundles,
for GC an arbitrary reductive complex Lie group, into the picture.
Indeed, let
us denote by θ the split real form of GC, by K a θ-invariant maximal compact
subgroup of GC, and by P a principal K-bundle. Recall that Σ acts on K via the
homomorphism ε : Σ −→ Z/2Z of (1.2) and the involution θ (as in (1.3)).
Definition 2.3. Given a 2-cocycle c ∈ Z 2(Σ;Z(K)), a c-equivariant structure on
P is a family τ := (τσ)σ∈Σ of (normalised) bundle maps from P to itself satisfying
the conditions:
(1) For all σ ∈ Σ, we have a commutative diagram
τσ−−−−→ P
y
(2) For all σ ∈ Σ, all p ∈ P and all k ∈ K, one has τσ(k · p) = θσ(k) · τσ(p).
(3) τ1Σ = IdP and, for all (σ1, σ2) ∈ Σ × Σ, τσ1 τσ2 = c(σ1, σ2)τσ1σ2 .
P
y
X
σ
−−−−→ X
10
FLORENT SCHAFFHAUSER
Equivalently, we can think of (τσ)σ∈Σ as a family (ϕσ : σ(P ) −→ P )σ∈Σ of principal
K-bundles isomorphisms satisfying ϕσ1 σ1(ϕσ2 ) = c(σ1, σ2)ϕσ1σ2 . When c ≡ 1, a
c-equivariant structure τ will simply be called an equivariant structure.
A homomorphism between two c-equivariant bundles (P, (τσ)σ∈Σ) and (P ′, (τ ′
σ)σ∈Σ)
(for the same cocycle c) is a homomorphism of principal bundles f : P −→ P ′ over
X such that, for all σ ∈ Σ, f ◦ τσ = τ ′
For instance, the category of c-equivariant principal GC-bundles for the group
GC = GL(r; C), θ(g) = g, Σ ≃ Z/2Z acting on X via an anti-holomorphic invo-
lution and c ≡ 1 is equivalent to the category of rank r Real vector bundles in
the sense of Atiyah ([Ati66]), because of the compatibilty relation gv = g v for the
standard GL(r; C)-action on Cr.
σ ◦ f .
Under the assumption of Definition 2.3, there is an induced Σ-action (βτ
σ)σ∈Σ on the gauge group GP , which is compatible with (βτ
σ)σ∈Σ
on the space AP of K-connections on P , defined as in (1.6). There is also a Σ-
action (ατ
σ)σ∈Σ in the
sense of (1.8). The assumption that θ is induced on K by the split real form of
GC is then sufficient to guarantee that the Σ-action on AP preserves the set of
projectively flat connections (which was for instance not always true for the real
form θ(g) = (gt)−1of GC = GL(r; C), as we saw in Section 1.1). In what follows,
we consider an element ξ in the centre of the Lie algebra of GP such that the set
F −1({ξ}) of projectively flat connections of curvature ξ is non-empty. That set
carries an induced Σ-action and, because of Relation (1.8), the fixed-point group
G(Σ,τ )
irr. Note that the Σ-actions on GP and
AP depend on the choice of the c-equivariant structure τ on P , as reflected in our
notation. We can then form the quotient
, preserving F −1({ξ})Σ
acts on A(Σ,τ )
P
P
F −1({ξ})(Σ,τ )
irr
P
/G(Σ,τ )
−→(cid:0)F −1({ξ})/GP(cid:1)Σ
,
P
P
irr
/G(Σ,τ )
and we have that the inclusion map F −1({ξ})(Σ,τ ) ֒→ F −1({ξ}) induces a map
(2.1)
jτ : F −1({ξ})(Σ,τ )
taking the G(Σ,τ )
-orbit of a Σ-invariant connection to its GP -orbit. As we saw in
Proposition 1.5, the target space of the map jτ is independent of the choice of the
2-cocycle c ∈ Z 2(Σ;Z(K)) and of the c-equivariant structure (τσ)σ∈Σ on P . The
source space, however, very much depends on those choices and the rest of this
section is devoted to the study of the map jτ , namely to understanding its fibres
and its image (we will show that jτ is neither injective nor surjective in general).
In Section 2.3, we will provide a modular interpretation of points in the quotient
F −1({ξ})Σ
The fibres of jτ are relatively easy to understand. Let A1 and A2 be two Σ-
fixed connections in F −1({ξ})irr such that A1 and A2 lie in the same GP -orbit,
i.e. jτ (G(Σ,τ )
· A1) = jτ (G(Σ,τ )
· A2). Then there is an element g ∈ GP such that
g · A2 = A1. So, for all σ ∈ Σ,
σ(A2) = βτ
σ(g−1 · A1) = ατ
σ(g−1) ∈ StabGP (A1) = Z(GP ). The map σ 7−→ gατ
g−1 · A1 = A2 = βτ
σ(g−1)
which implies that gατ
thus defined is readily seen to be a (normalised) Z(GP )-valued 1-cocycle on Σ,
whose cohomology class is independent of the choice of the element g. Moreover,
by definition, that cocycle splits over GC. Thus, we have defined a map
σ(g−1) · A1,
σ(g−1) · βτ
irr/G(Σ,τ )
σ(A1) = ατ
P
.
P
P
f : j−1
τ ({GP · A1}) −→ ker(cid:0)H 1(Σ;Z(GP )) −→ H 1(Σ;GP )(cid:1).
FINITE GROUP ACTIONS ON MODULI SPACES OF VECTOR BUNDLES
11
Proposition 2.4. The non-empty fibres of jτ are in bijection with the pointed set
ker(cid:0)H 1(Σ;Z(GP )) −→ H 1(Σ;GP )(cid:1).
Proof. It suffices to check that the map f defined above is bijective. The surjectivity
follows from the construction of the map f and the definition of
σ(a−1), then ατ
ker(cid:0)H 1(Σ;Z(GP )) −→ H 1(Σ;GP )(cid:1).
As for the injectivity, if the Z(GP )-valued 1-cocycle gατ
σ(g−1) actually splits over
Z(GP ), i.e. if there exists an element a ∈ Z(GP ) such that, for all σ ∈ Σ, gατ
σ(g−1) =
aατ
σ(a−1g) = a−1g and (a−1g)−1 · A1 = g−1 · (a−1 · A1) = g−1 · A1 =
A2, since Z(GP ) acts trivially on AP . This proves that A1 and A2 lie in the same
G(Σ,τ )
We note that nothing in the above uses that StabGP (A) = Z(GP ) and works in full
generality: we have proved that the fibre of jτ above the point jτ (G(Σ,τ )
· A) is in
-orbit, hereby showing that f is injective.
(cid:3)
P
P
bijection with
Next, to study the image of jτ for all c ∈ Z 2(Σ;Z(K)), let us introduce a map
ker(cid:0)H 1(Σ; StabGP (A)) −→ H 1(Σ;GP )(cid:1).
T :(cid:0)F −1(ξ})irr/GP(cid:1)Σ
−→ H 2(Σ;Z(K)),
σ(A0) = A0 (since βτ
σ1σ2 (A0) = u−1
that we will call the type map. This will explicitly use the fact that StabGP (A) =
Z(GP ), if only for the target space of the type map to make sense. In order to
define the map T , we start with an actual equivariant structure on P , i.e. we
assume that there is given a family (τσ)σ∈Σ satisfying τσ1σ2 = τσ1 τσ2 on P . This
enables us to identify Z(GP ) with Z(K) Σ-equivariantly (with respect to the Σ-
action (ατ
σ)σ∈Σ on GP and the Σ-action (θσ)σ∈Σ on Z(K)). Then we let A0 be
an irreducible, projectively flat connection on P , whose GP -orbit is Σ-fixed in the
quotient F −1({ξ})/GP . This means that, for all σ ∈ Σ, there exists uσ ∈ GP such
that uσ · βτ
1Σ = IdAP , we can take u1Σ = 1GP ). Hence, on the
one hand, βτ
σ2 )u−1
σ1σ2 (A0) = βτ
βτ
σ1 ·A0.
So, for all (σ1, σ2) ∈ Σ × Σ, the element cu(σ1, σ2) := uσ1ατ
σ1σ2 lies in
StabGP (A0) = Z(GP ). The map c : Σ × Σ −→ Z(GP ) thus defined is readily
seen to be a (normalised) 2-cocycle, whose cohomology class in H 2(Σ;Z(GP )) only
depends on the Σ-invariant orbit [A0] := GP · A0, not the connection A0 or the
elements (uσ)σ∈Σ. Since Z(GP ) is Σ-equivariantly isomorphic to Z(K), we have
H 2(Σ;Z(GP )) ≃ H 2(Σ;Z(K)) and the above construction defines a map
(2.2)
σ1σ2 · A0 and, on the other hand,
σ2 )·βτ
(F −1({ξ})irr/GP )Σ −→ H 2(Σ;Z(K))
σ1 (u−1
σ1 (uσ2 )u−1
σ2 ·A0) = ατ
σ2 (A0)) = βτ
σ1 (A0) = ατ
σ1 (u−1
σ1 (u−1
σ1 (βτ
where c(σ1, σ2) = uσ1ατ
σ1σ2 is defined from any family (uσ)σ∈Σ satisfying,
for all σ ∈ Σ, βτ
σ(A0) = u−1
· A0. Note that, if the GP -orbit of A0 contains
σ
0 which is actually Σ-fixed, then T ([A0]) = [1] in H 2(Σ;Z(K)).
a connection A′
Indeed, for all σ ∈ Σ, βτ
σ = 1 and we get that
c(σ1, σ2) = 1. Therefore, when c ≡ 1 and an equivariant structure τ = (τσ)σ∈Σ has
been chosen on P , the map
0, so we can take u′
0) = A′
σ(A′
T :
[A0]
σ1 (uσ2)u−1
7−→
[c]
jτ : F −1({ξ})Σ
irr/G(Σ,τ )
P
−→(cid:0)F −1({ξ})/GP(cid:1)Σ
,
12
FLORENT SCHAFFHAUSER
where the Σ-action on the left-hand side is induced by the equivariant structure τ
as in (1.6), satisfies
(2.3)
Im jτ ⊂ T −1({[1]}).
Remark 2.5. By construction, the type map
T : (F −1({ξ})/GP )Σ −→ H 2(Σ;Z(GP ))
lifts to a map T ′ : (F −1({ξ})/GP )Σ −→ H 1(Σ;GP /Z(GP )), i.e. factors through
the connecting homomorphism δ : H 1(Σ;GP /Z(GP )) −→ H 2(Σ;Z(GP )) induced
by the short exact sequence of group homomorphisms
1 −→ Z(GP ) −→ GP −→ GP /Z(GP ) −→ 1.
Two natural questions then are:
• Is Im jτ equal to T −1({[1]})?
• What can one say about the other fibres of the type map T ?
The answer to both these questions is provided by the next construction. Let
λ ∈ H 2(Σ;Z(K)) and assume that λ lies in the image of the map T . This means
that there exists a Σ-invariant GP -orbit [A0] and a family (uσ)σ∈Σ of elements of
GP such that, for all σ ∈ Σ, uσ · βτ
σ(A0) = A0 and, moreover, the 2-cocycle on Σ
defined by cu(σ1, σ2) := uσ1 ατ
σ1σ2 has cohomology class λ. Let us then set,
for all σ ∈ Σ, ϕ′
σ1 (uσ2 )u−1
σ := uσϕσ : σ(P ) −→ P ,
βτ,u
σ
: AP −→ AP
A 7−→ uσβτ
Then, for all (σ1, σ2) ∈ Σ × Σ,
σ(A)
and ατ,u
σ
: GP −→ GP
g
7−→ uσατ
σ(g)u−1
σ
.
σ1 σ1(ϕ′
ϕ′
σ2 ) = uσ1 ϕσ1 σ1(uσ2 ϕσ2 )
= uσ1 (ϕσ1 σ1(uσ2 )ϕ−1
σ1 )ϕσ1 σ1(ϕσ2 )
σ1 (uσ2 )(cid:1)(cid:0)ϕσ1 σ1(ϕσ2 )(cid:1)
= (cid:0)uσ1ατ
= (cid:0)cu(σ1, σ2)uσ1 uσ2(cid:1)ϕσ1σ2
= cu(σ1, σ2)ϕ′
σ1σ2
i.e. the family (ϕ′
σ)σ∈Σ defines a cu-equivariant structure on P (in the sense of
Definition 2.3). Moreover, we have new Σ-actions on AP and GP , respectively
given by
(2.4)
σ (A) =(cid:0)(ϕ′
βτ,u
σ )∗σ(A) = uσ · βτ
σ)−1(cid:1)∗
σ(A) = (u−1
σ )∗(ϕ−1
σ(A)
σ = uσατ
σ(g)u−1
σ = uστσgτ −1
σ u−1
σ .
and
(2.5)
ατ,u
σ (A) = ϕ′
σσ(g)(ϕ′
σ(A) =(cid:0)(uσϕσ)−1(cid:1)∗
σ)−1 = uσ(cid:0)ϕσσ(g)ϕ−1
σ (A0) = uσ · βτ
βτ,u
σ (cid:1)u−1
We then have, for the connection A0 we started with,
σ(A0) = uσ · (u−1
i.e. A0 is fixed for this new action, which we denote by
σ · A0) = A0,
A0 ∈ A(Σ,τ,u)
P
.
The inclusion F −1({ξ})(Σ,τ,u)
irr
֒→ F −1({ξ})irr induces a map
(2.6)
jτ,u : F −1({ξ})(Σ,τ,u)
irr
/G(Σ,τ,u)
P
−→(cid:0)F −1({ξ})irr/GP(cid:1)Σ
FINITE GROUP ACTIONS ON MODULI SPACES OF VECTOR BUNDLES
13
σ
above.
which generalises the map jτ introduced in (2.1) and where Σ now acts on GP via
the ατ,u
As we can see, the new Σ-actions on AP and GP , introduced respectively in (2.4)
and (2.5), are entirely determined by the choice of a family u = (uσ)σ∈Σ such that
cu(σ1, σ2) := uσ1ατ
σ1σ2 is a Z(GP )-valued 2-cocycle. These families already
appeared to define the type map in (2.2), so we give them a name.
Definition 2.6 (Modifying family). A modifying family of elements in GP is a
tuple u := (uσ)σ∈Σ of elements uσ ∈ GP indexed by σ ∈ Σ such that
σ1 (uσ2 )u−1
(1) u1Σ = 1GP ,
(2) For σ1, σ2 ∈ Σ, the elements cu(σ1, σ2) := uσ1 Ψσ1 (uσ2)u−1
Z(GP )-valued. In this case, cu is actually a 2-cocycle of Σ.
σ1σ2 ∈ GP is
As a direct generalisation of (2.3), we have
Im jτ,u ⊂ T −1({[cu]})
for any modifying family with associated 2-cocycle cu. The subtle point is that the
converse inclusion is not true in general, because we may also find, in that fibre,
elements of Im jτ ′, where τ ′ is another c-equivariant structure on P , non-isomorphic
to the previous one (this is what happens, for instance, for Real vector bundles of
different topological types in [Sch12]) and we now analyse this phenomenon (the
next paragraph runs parallel to [HS19, Section3.3], where the analogous situation
in the context of quiver representations is studied).
Let us start from a normalised 2-cocycle c : Σ × Σ −→ GP . Saying that the
cohomology class [c] lies in the image of the type map means that there exists a
modifying family u = (uσ)σ∈Σ whose associated 2-cocycle cu is cohomologous to c.
Let us then denote by Z 1
u(Σ,GP ) the set of GP -valued normalised 1-cocycles with
respect to the modified Σ-action (2.5) on GP . The following two lemmas have very
simple proofs (see [HS19, Lemmas 3.18, 3.19]).
Lemma 2.7. Replacing uσ with aσuσ where aσ ∈ Z(GP ) if necessary, we can
assume that cu(σ1, σ2) = c(σ1, σ2).
Lemma 2.8. There is a bijection u′ 7−→ bu′(σ) := u′
modifying families u′ such that cu′ = cu and the set Z 1
map b 7−→ ub
in Z 1
u(Σ;GP ) if and only if there exists g ∈ GP such that, for all σ ∈ Σ, u′′
σ(g−1).
σατ
gu′
Remark 2.9. If b1 and b1 are cohomologous 1-cocycles in Z 1
u(Σ;GP ), the maps
jτ,ub1 and jτ,ub2 defined as in (2.6) have the same images. Indeed, any g satisfying
ub2
σ = gub1
σu−1
σ , between the set of all
u(Σ,GP ), whose inverse is the
σ := b(σ)uσ. Moreover, two 1-cocycles bu′ and bu′′ are cohomologous
σ =
σ ατ
σ(g−1) for all σ ∈ Σ provides a group isomorphism
g−1 ≃ G(Σ,τ,ub1 )
= gG(Σ,τ,ub1 )
G(Σ,τ,ub2 )
P
P
P
and an equivariant bijection
F −1({ξ})(Σ,τ,ub2 )
irr
= g · F −1({ξ})(Σ,τ,ub1 )
irr
≃ F −1({ξ})(Σ,τ,ub1 )
irr
.
We can now give a decomposition of the fibre of the type map
−→ H 2(Σ;Z(K))
T :(cid:0)F −1(ξ})irr/GP(cid:1)Σ
u(Σ;GP )/H 1(Σ;Z(GP )): as
over [cu], where the indexing set is the orbit space H 1
Z(GP ) is central and Σ-invariant in GP , the map (a, b) 7−→ (ab)(σ) := (aσb(σ))σ∈Σ
14
FLORENT SCHAFFHAUSER
u(Σ,Z(GP )) on the set H 1
induces an action of the group H 1
u we
mean the first cohomology set associated to the Σ-action ατ,u on GP defined in (2.5);
moreover, H 1
u(Σ,Z(GP )) = H 1(Σ;Z(GP )) is actually independent of the choice of
the family u = (uσ)σ∈Σ, as Z(GP ) is the centre of GP . For [b] ∈ H 1
u(Σ,GP ), we
shall denote its H 1(Σ,Z(GP ))-orbit by [b]. As a side remark, this gives the following
abstract classification result for cu-equivariant structures on E.
u(Σ,GP ), where by H 1
Proposition 2.10. Given a modifying family u = (uσ)σ∈Σ with associated 2-
cocycle cu ∈ Z 2(Σ;Z(K)) and an equivariant structure (τσ)σ∈Σ, the set of iso-
morphism classes of cu-equivariant structures is in bijection with the pointed set
H 1
u(Σ;GP ).
Proof. First, recall from (1.7) that ατ
σ . Moreover, τσ1 τσ2 = τσ1σ2 ,
since by assumption τ is an equivariant structure (for the trivial cocycle). The
bijection we are looking for is then induced by the map
σ(g) = τσgτ −1
(2.7)
Z 1
u(Σ;GP ) −→ {cu−equivariant structures}
τ b
σ := b(σ)uστσ = ub
στσ
b
.
7−→
The family τ ′ thus defined is indeed a cu-equivariant structure, since
σ1 τ b
τ b
σ2τσ2
σ2 )τσ1 τσ2
σ1τσ1 u′
σ1ατ
σ1 (u′
σ2 = u′
= u′
= cu(σ1, σ2)u′
= cu(σ1, σ2)τ b
σ1σ2
σ1σ2 τσ1σ2
σ = aστ b
σ = uτ b
σu−1.
σ(u−1)g−1
and replacing b by the cohomologous 1-cocycle b′(σ) := ub(σ)uσατ
the conjugate cu-equivariant structure τ b′
We also note that replacing b by b′(σ) := aσb(σ) in (2.7), where a ∈ Z 1(Σ;Z(GP )),
yields τ b′
σ for all σ ∈ Σ. In other words, the map (2.7) is H 1(Σ;Z(GP ))-
equivariant: this implies that the classification result of c-equivariant structures
given in Proposition 2.10 is independent of the choice of the modifying family u
with associated cocyle cu = c. The next theorem is the main result of the paper.
We refer to [HS19, Theorem 3.21] for a similar statement in the context of quiver
representations.
σ yields
(cid:3)
Theorem 2.11. Let u be a modifying family of elements in GP in the sense of Def-
inition 2.6 and let cu be the associated 2-cocycle. Let T be the type map introduced
in (2.2). Then there is a decomposition
T −1({[cu]}) =
G
[b]∈H 1
u(Σ,GP )/H 1(Σ,Z(GP ))
Im jτ,ub
where ub is the modifying family determined by u and a choice of 1-cocycle b ∈ [b]
and jτ,ub is the map defined in (2.6). As in Proposition 2.4, non-empty fibres of
jτ,u are in bijection with the pointed set
ker(cid:0)H 1(Σ;Z(K)) −→ H 1
Proof. For each [b] ∈ H 1
u(Σ,GP ), we take a representative b of [b] and consider the
map jτ,ub defined in (2.6); the image of this map does not depend on our choice of
representative by Remark 2.9.
u(Σ;GP )(cid:1).
FINITE GROUP ACTIONS ON MODULI SPACES OF VECTOR BUNDLES
15
To show that these images cover T −1([cu]), take GP ·A ∈ T −1([cu]). By definition
σ)σ∈Σ of elements in GP
and [cu′] = [cu]. By Lemma 2.7, we can assume that
u(Σ,GP ) such that u′ = ub. Hence,
To prove that this union is disjoint, suppose that GP · A ∈ Im jτ,ub1 ∩ Im jτ,ub2 .
of the type map, there exists a modifying family u′ = (u′
such that A ∈ F −1({ξ})(Σ,τ,u)
cu′ = cu and, by Lemma 2.8, there exists b ∈ Z 1
GP · A ∈ Im jτ,ub .
Then there exist modifying families ui, for i = 1, 2, such that
irr
(1) [bui ] = [bi] ∈ H 1
(2) A ∈ F −1({ξ})(Σ,τ,ui)
irr
(3) cu1 = cu2 = cu.
u(Σ,GP ),
for i = 1, 2,
The only one of these assertions that is not clear is the final one, which follows
from the fact that if cubi = cu, for i = 1, 2, and if [b] = [b′], then cub = cub′ .
From (2), we deduce that aσ := u2,σu−1
1,σ ∈ StabGP (A) = Z(GP ), from which we
conclude that bu2,σ = aσbu1,σ for all σ, therefore that [bu1] and [bu2 ] lie in the same
H 1(Σ,Z(GP ))-orbit in H 1
(cid:3)
u(Σ,GP ). This completes the proof.
Thus, we can completely describe the fixed-point set of the Σ-action on the
moduli space MX (r, d) of stable holomorphic vector bundles of rank r and degree
d by using the following strategy:
• We define a type map T : MX (r, d)Σ −→ H 2(Σ;Z(K)) and we decompose
MX (r, d)Σ into the union of fibres of T ;
• We show that any non-empty fibre T −1({[c]}) decomposes into a disjoint
union, indexed by the pointed set H 1
u(Σ;GE)/H 1(Σ;Z(GE)), where E is
the unitary gauge group of a smooth Hermitian vector bundle of rank r
and degree d, equipped with a c-equivariant structure τ and u = (uσ)σ∈Σ
satisfies uσ1 ατ
σ1σ2 = c(σ1, σ2).
σ1 (uσ2 )u−1
• In the decomposition above, each of the pieces of T −1({[c]}) is the image
of a map
jτ,ub : F −1({
d
r})(Σ,τ,u)
irr
E −→(cid:0)F −1({
/GΣ
d
r})/GE(cid:1)Σ
whose non-empty fibres are all in bijection with the kernel of the natural
map
H 1(Σ;Z(U(r))) −→ H 1
u(Σ;GE),
whose source space is in fact independent of the bundle E.
We hope to have made a convincing case that methods of group cohomology
can help clarify an otherwise intricate situation (to wit, the study of the fixed-
point set of a group action on a coarse moduli space of geometric objects), while
at the same time providing sufficiently general results, to be used in a variety of
concrete geometric situations. For example here, the cohomology groups appearing
as indexing sets in Theorem 2.11 can be computed using similar techniques in
examples that look a priori different (the parabolic vector bundles of [AG06] and
the Real vector bundles of [Sch12], to mention a few). In [HS19, HS], we apply
similar techniques to construct branes in hyper-kähler quiver varieties and to study
arithmetic aspects of quiver representations over a non-algebraically closed field.
16
FLORENT SCHAFFHAUSER
2.3. Moduli of equivariant bundles. In Section 2.2, we saw that, given a cocycle
c ∈ Z 2(Σ;Z(K)) and a c-equivariant structure τ = (τσ)σ∈Σ on a principal K-bundle
P (for K a compact Lie group equipped with the involution coming from the split
real form of GC := KC), there was a map
jτ : F −1({ξ})Σ
irr/G(Σ,τ )
P
−→(cid:0)F −1({ξ})irr/GP(cid:1)Σ
whose image was contained in the fibre T −1({[c]}) of the type map defined in (2.2)
and whose non-empty fibres were in bijection with the pointed set
ker(cid:0)H 1(Σ;Z(GP )) −→ H 1(Σ;GP )(cid:1).
, consisting of G(Σ,τ )
P
P
irr/G(Σ,τ )
The goal of the present section is to provide a modular interpretation of the quo-
tients F −1({ξ})Σ
-orbits of Σ-invariant, projectively flat,
irreducible K-connections on P . First we recall from [Sin59] that a K-connection
on P may be seen as a holomorphic structure on the bundle PC := P ×K KC,
obtained by extending the structure group of P to the complexification KC = GC
of K, and that isomorphism classes of such structures are precisely the GC-orbits
of such K-connections, where GC := GP ×Ad KC is the complexified gauge group,
i.e. the automorphism group of PC, acting on K-connections through the previous
identification with holomorphic structures (hereby extending the natural action of
GP on the space AP of K-connections on P ). Then, for a K-connection A on P to
be Σ-invariant means that, with respect to the holomorphic structure induced by
A, the map
τ C
σ :
PC −→
[p, g]
PC
7−→ [τσ(p), θσ(g)]
is holomorphic if σ : X −→ X is holomorphic and anti-holomorphic if σ is anti-
holomorphic on X. Thus, a Σ-invariant K-connection A on P defines a c-equivariant
structure in the holomorphic sense on the holomorphic GC-bundle PC (simply mod-
ify Definition 2.3 by adding the requirement that τ C
σ : PC −→ PC is holomorphic
if σ : X −→ X is holomorphic and anti-holomorphic if σ is anti-holomorphic). If
A is moreover irreducible and projectively flat, then the holomorphic bundle PC
is simple and stable in the sense of Ramanathan ([Ram75, RS88]). Therefore, we
can interpret the quotient F −1({ξ})Σ
as a moduli space of principal holo-
morphic GC-bundles equipped with an additional datum, namely a c-equivariant
structure in the holomorphic sense. Then F −1({ξ})Σ
is the space of isomor-
phism classes of geometrically stable, simple, c-equivariant holomorphic structures
on the smooth principal GC-bundle PC.
irr/G(Σ,τ )
irr/G(Σ,τ )
P
P
P
irr/G(Σ,τ )
Since Σ is a finite group acting on the affine space AP by affine transforma-
tions, the fixed-point set AΣ
P is non-empty and the issue is to know whether it
contains irreducible, projectively flat connections (in order for the moduli space
F −1({ξ})Σ
to be non-empty). We shall now focus on the proof of that re-
sult in the vector bundle case (K = U(r) and θ(g) = g on GC = GL(r; C)). To
prepare for it, let us, for notational convenience, denote by C the space AE of all
unitary connections / holomorphic structures on the Hermitian vector bundle E
and let us introduce the spaces Css and Cs, consisting respectively of semi-stable
and stable holomorphic structures on E. The Σ-action on C preserves Css and
Cs and we wish to show that CΣ
s is non-empty and connected because, using re-
sults of [Sch17] to establish the existence of a deformation retraction from CΣ
s onto
FINITE GROUP ACTIONS ON MODULI SPACES OF VECTOR BUNDLES
17
r})Σ
r})Σ
irr, this is equivalent to saying that F −1({ d
F −1({ d
irr is non-empty and con-
nected (the existence of the deformation retraction follows from the invariance of
the Yang-Mills flow under the action of Σ, as in Section 3.3 of [Sch17], and the
convergence of that flow, [Das92, Råd92]). First, we observe that, for r = 1, any
holomorphic line bundle on E is stable so CΣ
s = CΣ, which is a non-empty affine
subspace of C. In particular, CΣ
s is connected if r = 1. We henceforth assume that
r ≥ 2. Recall that the genus g of X is assumed to greater or equal to 2 and that
we have a group homomorphism ε : Σ −→ Z/2Z (defined in (1.2)), whose kernel
we shall denote by Σ+. Consider then the Harder-Narasimhan stratification of C
([HN75]): C is the disjoint union of the strata Cµ where µ = ((ri, di))1≤i≤ℓ rep-
resents the rank and degree of the successive quotients of the Harder-Narasimhan
filtration 0 = E0 ⊂ E1 ⊂ . . . ⊂ Eℓ = E, which by construction is subject to the
condition d1
. The complex codimension dµ of Cµ in C is finite and given
r1
by
dµ = X1≤i<j≤ℓ
(dirj − djri + rirj (g − 1)).
> . . . > dl
rl
An element σ ∈ Σ sends the Harder-Narasimhan filtration of E to the Harder-
Narasimhan filtration of σ(E) so the Σ-action on C preserves each stratum Cµ and
we have that:
is a finite-dimensional complex vector space and
µ
(1) For each µ, CΣ+
/CΣ+
codimCΣ+ CΣ+
(2) The group Σ/Σ+ acts on CΣ+
µ
µ = codimC Cµ = dµ.
.
codimension of CΣ
CΣ+
Let us now show that CΣ+
is contained in the closure of CΣ+
ss , CΣ+
CΣ+
µ
> d2
with d1
r2
r1
ss
µ′
and, if that group is non-trivial, the real
in
µ in CΣ is equal to dµ, the complex codimension of CΣ+
is non-empty and connected. For all µ such that CΣ+
6=
for some µ′ of the form ((r1, d1), (r2, d2))
µ
µ
(and r1 + r2 = r). Since r ≥ 2 and g ≥ 2, one has
dµ′ = d1r2 − d2r1 + r1r2(g − 1) ≥ 1 + (r − 1)(g − 1) ≥ 2,
.
ss
ss
ss
ss
in CΣ+
֒→ CΣ+
j∗−→ πk(CΣ+
So the complement of CΣ+
is a countable union of closed submanifolds of
complex codimension greater or equal to 2, which proves that CΣ+
is open and
dense in CΣ+
In particular, it is non-empty. By results of Daskalopoulos and
Uhlenbeck ([DU95]), the inclusion map j : CΣ+
induces isomorphisms on
homotopy groups πk(CΣ+
) for all k ≤ (r − 1)(g − 1) + 1. This implies
ss )
in particular that CΣ+
is connected for all r ≥ 2 and all g ≥ 2. Again by results
of [DU95], CΣ+
(in particular, it is non-empty) and it is
connected if (r − 1)(g − 1) ≥ 2, i.e. if r > 2 or g > 2.
ss = (CΣ+
)Σ/Σ+
because, either Σ/Σ+ is trivial and there is nothing to prove, or Σ/Σ+ ≃ Z/2Z
and the complex codimension dµ′ in the proof above is now a real codimension,
so the inequality dµ′ ≥ 2 is enough to guarantee that CΣ
ss is open and dense (in
particular, non-empty) in CΣ. Then the results of Daskalopoulos and Uhlenbeck
can be adapted to this real setting (see [BHH10]) to show that CΣ
ss is connected if
r ≥ 2 and g ≥ 2, and that CΣ
s is always non-empty, as well as connected if r > 2 or
g > 2. We have thus proved the following result.
The same type of argument works for CΣ
is open and dense in CΣ+
s = (CΣ+
and CΣ
ss )Σ/Σ+
ss
s
s
18
FLORENT SCHAFFHAUSER
Theorem 2.12. Recall that g ≥ 2, r ≥ 1 and d ∈ Z. Given a 2-cocycle c ∈
Z 2(Σ;Z(U(r))) and a c-equivariant Hermitian vector bundle (E, τ ) over (X, Σ), the
X (r, d, τ ) := F −1({ d
moduli space MΣ
E is non-empty and connected, except
possibly if g = 2, r = 2 and d is even.
irr/GΣ
r})Σ
Proof. The proof for r = 1, g > 2 or g = 2 and r > 2 was given above. For g = 2,
r = 2 and d odd, the result also holds because Cs = Css in that case and we have
seen that CΣ
We expect MΣ
but the proof above is inconclusive in that case.
X (2, 2d, τ ) to also be non-empty and connected when X is of genus 2
ss is always non-empty and connected if g ≥ 2.
(cid:3)
3. Representations of orbifold fundamental groups
3.1. Narasimhan-Seshadri correspondences. One may view the Narasimhan-
Seshadri correspondence as follows. Let H be the Poincaré upper half-plane and let
Γ ⊂ PSL(2; R) = Aut(H) be a discrete subgroup. If Γ acts freely and cocompactly
on H, then there is a homeomorphism between the space Hom(Γ; U(r))irr/U(r)
of (equivalence classes of) irreducible unitary representations of Γ and the moduli
space MX(r, 0) of stable holomorphic vector bundles of rank r and degree 0 over
the compact Riemann surface X := H/Γ (in particular, π1(X) ≃ Γ). More gener-
ally, Narasimhan and Seshadri proved the existence of a homeomorphism between
MX(r, d) and the space of unitary representations of a certain central extension Γd
of Γ by Z (the group Γd can be identified with the fundamental group of the unit cir-
cle bundle of an arbitrary line bundle of degree d over X, see [FS92]). Note that Γd
no longer acts effectively on H here, because the natural map Γd −→ Γ ⊂ Aut(H)
has kernel Z, by construction. Generalising in another direction, one may ask what
happens when there is only a normal subgroup of finite index Γ′ ⊂ Γ such that Γ′
acts freely. The compact Riemann surface Y := H/Γ then has a natural orbifold
structure, obtained from the action of the finite group Σ := Γ/Γ′ on the Riemann
surface X := H/Γ′, and in fact πorb
(Y ) ≃ Γ. We will see shortly what becomes of
the Narasimhan-Seshadri correspondence when we assume moreover that the group
Γ′ is still cocompact (such an assumption being justified by a standard application
of Selberg's lemma: Γ contains a torsion-free normal subgroup of finite index Γ′).
Yet another type of generalisation is obtained by considering discrete subgroups of
the full automorphism group Aut±(H) ≃ PGL(2; R) ≃ PSL(2; R) ⋊ Z/2Z (where
the action of Z/2Z on PSL(2; R) is given by conjugation by the matrix (cid:18)−1 0
1(cid:19),
corresponding to the anti-holomophic involution z 7−→ −z of H).This means allow-
ing Γ to contain anti-holomorphic transformations of H. If we consider the group
homomorphism η : Γ −→ {±1} ≃ Z/2Z sending anti-holomorphic maps to (−1)
and set Γ′ := ker η, then saying that η is non-trivial amounts to saying that the
compact Riemann surface X := H/Γ′ has a natural anti-holomorphic involution,
coming from the induced (Γ/Γ′)-action on H/Γ′ (i.e., as an algebraic curve, X is
defined over the field of real numbers). The topological surface Y := H/Γ then
has a natural structure of Klein surface (dianalytic manifold of dimension 2) and,
again, we have an isomorphism πorb
(Y ) ≃ Γ. The difference with the previous case
can be explained as follows: in both cases we have a short exact sequence
0
1
1
(3.1)
1 −→ π1(X) −→ πorb
1
(Y ) −→ Σ −→ 1
FINITE GROUP ACTIONS ON MODULI SPACES OF VECTOR BUNDLES
19
and a group homomorphism ε : Σ −→ Z/2Z induced by the group homomorphism
Aut±(H) −→ {±1} taking anti-holomorphic transformations to (−1), but in the
first case (i.e. when Γ ⊂ Aut(H)) the homomorphism ε is trivial, while it is non-
trivial if Γ contains an antiholomorphic transformation.
In the remainder of the present section, we will explain what type of Narasimhan-
Seshadri correspondence we obtain in this orbifold setting. Further generalisations
are possible, for instance to orbifold fundamental groups of Real Seifert manifolds
([Sch17]) or to discrete subgroups Γ ⊂ Aut±(H) which only have finite covolume
(the case where Γ ⊂ Aut(H) acts freely and is of finite covolume first appeared in the
Mehta-Seshadri theorem, see [MS80]; it has been vastly generalised in [Boa11] and in
[BS15]). Combining the previous two settings, we now consider a cocompact Fuch-
sian group Γ ⊂ PGL(2; R) = Aut±(H). By Selberg's lemma, Γ+ := Γ ∩ PSL(2; R)
contains a torsion-free normal subgroup of finite index, say Γ′. We shall denote by
η : Γ −→ Z/2Z the group homomorphism taking anti-holomorphic transformations
to (−1). We also fix once and for all a 2-cocycle e ∈ Z 2(Z/2Z;Z(U(r))), where
Z/2Z acts on Z(U(r)) ≃ S1 via the involution z 7−→ z, induced by the involution
θ : u 7−→ u on U(r). The associated extension of Z/2Z by U(r) will be denoted
by U(r) ×e Z/2Z. First, let us discuss an appropriate class of representations for
orbifold fundamental groups of the type Γ above.
Definition 3.1. An e-twisted unitary representation of Γ is a group homomorphism
: Γ −→ U(r) ×e Z/2Z such that the diagram
Γ
η
!❇❇❇❇❇❇❇❇❇
Z/2Z
xqqqqqqqqqq
U(r) ×e Z/2Z
commutes. The set of such representations will be denoted by Homη(Γ; U(r) ×e
Z/2Z). Two representations 1, 2 are called equivalent if there is an element
u ∈ U(r) such that, for all γ ∈ Γ, 2(γ) = u1(γ)u−1.
We note that, if η is the trivial homomorphism (i.e. Γ ⊂ PSL(2; R)), then
Homη(Γ; U(r) ×e Z/2Z) = Hom(Γ; U(r)).
We now want to interpret the representation space
Homη(Γ; U(r) ×e Z/2Z)/U(r)
as a moduli space of holomorphic vector bundles on a certain Riemann surface X.
To that end, we observe the following: if we fix a cocompact normal subgroup of
finite index Γ′ ⊂ Γ+ = Γ∩ PSL(2; R) that acts freely on H and set Σ := Γ/Γ′, then
we have a compact Riemann surface X := H/Γ′ equipped with an action of the finite
group Σ ֒→ Aut±(X) and the group homomorphism η : πorb
(X/Σ) ≃ Γ −→ Z/2Z
canonically lifts to a group homomorphism πorb
(X/Σ) −→ Σ, making the diagram
Σ
1
1
9rrrrrrrrrrr
η
ε
/ Z/2Z
πorb
1
(X/Σ)
/
/
!
x
9
/
20
FLORENT SCHAFFHAUSER
commute, where ε : Σ −→ Z/2Z is defined as in (1.2). The set Homη(Γ; U(r) ×e
Z/2Z) can therefore also be seen as the set Homε(Γ; U(r) ×e Z/2Z) consisting of
group homomorphisms : πorb
(X/Σ) −→ U(r) ×e Z/2Z such that the diagram
1
1 −−−−→ π1(X) −−−−→ πorb
1
(X/Σ) −−−−→ Σ −−−−→ 1
y
y
yε
1 −−−−→ U(r) −−−−→ U(r) ×e Z/2Z −−−−→ Z/2Z −−−−→ 1
commutes. In particular, the set Homε(πorb
(X/Σ); U(r) ×e Z/2Z) that we have
just defined is actually independent of the choice of the presentation (X, Σ) for the
orbifold Y := H/Γ ≃ X/Σ (i.e. independent of the choice of Γ′).
holomorphic vector bundle
We will now show that, for all ∈ Homε(πorb
(X/Σ); U(r)×eZ/2Z) the polystable
1
1
E := (H × Cr)/π1(X)
over X comes equipped with a natural (ε∗e)-equivariant structure in the sense of
Definition 2.1, where ε∗e ∈ Z 2(Σ;Z(U(r))).
In order to see this, the basic con-
struction goes as follows. We first choose a family (γσ)σ∈Σ of elements of πorb
(X/Σ)
such that, for all σ ∈ Σ, γσ maps to σ under the canonical map πorb
(X/Γ) −→ Σ
constructed above (note that, in general, we do not have γσ1 γσ2 = γσ1σ2 ; the short
exact sequence (3.1) need not admit splittings) and we consider the transformations
1
1
eτσ : H × Cr −→
(p, v)
H × Cr
.
7−→ (γσ · p, (γσ) · v)
Here, (γσ) = (uσ, ε(σ)) ∈ U(r) ×c Z/2Z acts on v ∈ Cr via (γσ) · v := uσθσ(v).
Each eτσ then descends to a map τσ : E −→ E and the family (τσ)σ∈Σ thus
constructed satisfies the conditions of Definition 2.1 for the cocycle c := ε∗e ∈
Z 2(Σ;Z(U(r))). Moreover, the isomorphism class of the (ε∗e)-equivariant bundle
(E, (τσ)σ∈Σ) obtained in that way is independent of the choice of the family (γσ)σ∈Σ
and the isomorphism class of the representation ∈ Homε(πorb
(X/Σ); U(r) ×e
Z/2Z). We refer to Section 2.2 of [Sch17] for further details of that construction,
where it is presented in the case where ε : Σ −→ Z/2Z is an isomorphism but with
the same general formalism. We have therefore defined a Narasimhan-Seshadri
map, from the representation space
1
Homε(Γ; U(r) ×e Z/2Z)/U(r),
to the space of isomorphism classes of polystable (ε∗e)-equivariant holomorphic vec-
tor bundles of rank r and degree 0. As a matter of fact, there is such a Narasimhan-
Seshadri map for every choice of a presentation (X, Σ) for the orbifold Y = H/Γ.
Our main result in this section is then the following analogue of the Narasimhan-
Seshadri theorem for orbifold fundamental groups of the type Γ ⊂ PGL(2; R) that
we have been considering.
Theorem 3.2. Let Γ ⊂ PGL(2; R) be a cocompact Fuchsian group and let Γ′ be
a torsion-free normal subgroup of finite index of the group Γ+ := Γ ∩ PSL(2; R).
Denote by Σ the finite group Γ/Γ′, by ε : Σ −→ Z/2Z the group homomorphism
constructed in (1.2), and by X the compact Riemann surface H/Γ′. Then, given a
2-cocycle e ∈ Z 2(Z/2Z;Z(U(r))), there is a homeomorphism between the represen-
tation space
Homε(Γ; U(r) ×e Z/2Z)/U(r)
FINITE GROUP ACTIONS ON MODULI SPACES OF VECTOR BUNDLES
21
Σ
X (r, 0, ε∗e), consisting of isomorphism classes of polystable
and the moduli space M
(ε∗e)-equivariant holomorphic vector bundles of rank r and degree 0, that moduli
space being equipped with the topology given by the bijective correspondence
Σ
X (r, 0, ε∗e) ≃G[τ ]
M
F −1({0})Σ/GΣ
E,
where the union runs over all smooth isomorphism classes of (ε∗e)-equivariant Her-
mitian vector bundles (E, τ ) of rank r and degree 0.
Apart from its somewhat intricate statement, this correspondence is perhaps
not very satisfying yet, for the following two reasons. First, topological types of
(ε∗e)-equivariant Hermitian vector bundles are not know in general (see however
Proposition 2.10 for an indication of what to compute in general and [BHH10] for
an explicit description in the case where ε : Σ −→ Z/2Z is an isomorphism). And
second, there is no available algebraic construction of the "moduli space"
Σ
X (r, 0, ε∗e) =G[τ ]
M
M
Σ
X (r, 0, τ )
that the author is aware of. In Section 2, we were at best able to relate, via the
maps jε∗e,τ , the smaller moduli spaces MΣ
X (r, 0, τ ), consisting of geometrically sta-
ble bundles only, to fixed points of the action of Σ on the moduli variety MX (r, 0).
Providing an algebraic construction, for Γ satisfying the assumptions of Theorem
3.2, of moduli spaces of vector bundles over the orbifold H/Γ (in an appropiate
category) and relating them to orbifold representations of Γ in the sense of Def-
inition 3.1 seems like a challenging problem, quite close in spirit to the original
Narasimhan-Seshadri and Mehta-Seshadri correspondences. Note that the main
difference between the problem just stated and the papers [Boa11, BS15] is the fact
that our group Γ is authorised to contain anti-holomorphic transformations of the
Poincaré half-plane. We hope that, even after the problem above has been solved,
the gauge-theoretic perspective developed in the present paper will be useful to
study the topology (in particular, the number of connected components) of the
moduli space Homη(Γ; U(r)×e Z/2Z)/U(r), using an arbitrary presentation (X, Σ)
of the orbifold Y = H/Γ, which was for instance the strategy adopted in [Sch12] for
the case where ε : Σ −→ Z/2Z is an isomorphism. In fact, in the latter case, more
topological information can be obtained by following up on this circle of ideas, such
as Betti numbers with mod 2 coefficients of the quotients F −1({ d
E, as shown
in [LS13].
r})Σ/GΣ
3.2. Holonomy representations associated to invariant connections. To
prove Theorem 3.2, it suffices to construct an inverse to the Narasimhan-Seshadri
map constructed in Section 3.1. Such a map is provided, quite classically, by taking
the holonomy of the relevant connections, namely here the Σ-invariant connections
considered in Section 2.2. The main technical result is the following one, for the
proof of which we refer to Proposition 4.2 of [Sch17].
Proposition 3.3. Let (E, (τσ)σ∈Σ) be an (ε∗e)-equivariant Hermitian vector bun-
dle over (X, Σ) and let A be a Σ-invariant unitary connection on E. Then, given
any path γ ∈ X, the parallel transport operators T A
σ◦γ =
σ◦γ satisfy T A
γ and T A
22
FLORENT SCHAFFHAUSER
τσT A
γ τ −1
σ . That is to say, one has a commutative diagram
Eσ(γ(0))
τσx
Eγ(0)
T A
σ◦γ−−−−→ Eσ(γ(1))
τσx
T A
γ−−−−→ Eγ(1).
If moreover A is a flat connection, then the parallel transport operators on loops at
a given base point x ∈ X induce a group homomorphism Hol : π1(X; x) −→ U(r),
and the point is now to show that the Σ-invariance of A implies that Hol extends
to a group homomorphism gHol : πorb
(X/Σ) −→ U(r) ×e Z/2Z that makes the
1 −−−−→ π1(X) −−−−→ πorb
(X/Σ) −−−−→ Σ −−−−→ 1
following diagram commute
1
1
yHol
ygHol
yε
1 −−−−→ U(r) −−−−→ U(r) ×e Z/2Z −−−−→ Z/2Z −−−−→ 1
which follows from Proposition 3.3 (we refer to Theorem 4.4 of [Sch17] for details).
This completes the proof of Theorem 3.2.
3.3. Equivariant representations. We conclude by explaining how to simplify
the statement of Theorem 3.2 when the Riemann surface X contains a Σ-fixed
point x. Then the group Σ acts on π1(X; x) via γ 7−→ σ ◦ γ and we can consider
σ() = θσ ◦ ◦ σ−1. This
the induced Σ-action on Hom(π1(X; x); U(r)) given by βτ
σ(gg−1) =
is compatible with the Σ-action (θσ)σ∈Σ on U(r), in the sense that βτ
θσ(g)βτ
σ()θσ(g)−1, and we note that is fixed by that Σ-action if and only if
is Σ-equivariant. We are then in the same type of situation as in Section 2.2: the
group U(r)Σ acts on the set Hom(π1(X; x); U(r))Σ
irr and there is a map
j : Hom(π1(X; x); U(r))Σ
irr/U(r)Σ −→ (Hom(π1(X; x); U(r))/U(r))Σ
whose image is contained in the fibre T −1({[1]}) of a type map
T : (Hom(π1(X; x); U(r))/U(r))Σ −→ H 2(Σ;Z(U(r)))
1
which is defined as in Section 2.2. The point is to realise that the choice of x ∈ X Σ
defines an isomorphism πorb
(X/Σ) ≃ π1(X; x) ⋊ Σ for the action of Σ on π1(X; x)
described earlier. And then, Σ-equivariant representations : π1(X; x) −→ U(r)
will extend to representationsb : π1(X; x)⋊Σ −→ U(r)⋊Z/2Z by settingb(γ, σ) :=
((γ), ε(σ)). The map
Hom(π1(X; x); U(r))Σ/U(r)Σ −→ Homε(π1(X; x) ⋊ Σ; U(r) ⋊ Σ)/U(r)
[]
7−→
thus defined is always injective, because if 1, 2 : π1(X; x) −→ U(r) are two Σ-
equivariant representations such that b2 = (g, 1) · b1 for some g ∈ U(r), then, for
all σ ∈ Σ,
(1, ε(σ)) = b2(1, σ) = (g, 1) · b1(1, σ) = (g, 1)(1, ε(σ))(g−1, 1) = (gθσ(g−1), 1)
so gθσ(g−1) = 1, which means that g ∈ U(r)Σ, hence that 1 = b1π1(X;x) and 2 =
b2π1(X;x) are U(r)Σ-conjugate. Moreover, as shown in Proposition 2.9 of [Sch17],
the map [] 7−→ [b] is surjective when H 1(Σ; U(r)) = {[1]}, and when H 1(Σ; U(r))
is not trivial, it is possible to modify the Σ-action on Hom(π1(X; x); U(r)) and
[b]
FINITE GROUP ACTIONS ON MODULI SPACES OF VECTOR BUNDLES
23
on U(r) by introducing a cocycle (aσ)σ∈Σ representing a given cohomology class
κ ∈ H 1(Σ; U(r)), as in Section 2.2 of the present paper, to prove that all points in
Homε(π1(X; x) ⋊ Σ; U(r) ⋊ Σ)/U(r) come from Σ-equivariant representations, for
different actions of Σ.
References
[AB83] M. F. Atiyah and R. Bott. The Yang-Mills equations over Riemann surfaces. Philos.
Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A, 308(1505):523 -- 615, 1983.
[AG06] J. E. Andersen and J. Grove. Automorphism fixed points in the moduli space of semi-
stable bundles. Q. J. Math., 57(1):1 -- 35, 2006.
[Ati66] M. F. Atiyah. K-theory and reality. Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2), 17:367 -- 386, 1966.
[BHH10] I. Biswas, J. Huisman, and J. Hurtubise. The moduli space of stable vector bundles over
a real algebraic curve. Math. Ann., 347(1):201 -- 233, 2010.
[Boa11] P.P. Boalch. Riemann-Hilbert for tame complex parahoric connections. Transform.
Groups, 16(1):27 -- 50, 2011.
[BS15] V. Balaji and C.S. Seshadri. Moduli of parahoric G-torsors on a compact Riemann surface.
J. Algebr. Geom., 24(1):1 -- 49, 2015.
[Das92] G. D. Daskalopoulos. The topology of the space of stable bundles on a compact Riemann
surface. J. Differential Geom., 36(3):699 -- 746, 1992.
[Don83] S. K. Donaldson. A new proof of a theorem of Narasimhan and Seshadri. J. Differential
Geom., 18(2):269 -- 277, 1983.
[DU95] G. Daskalopoulos and K. Uhlenbeck. An application of transversality to the topology of
the moduli space of stable bundles. Topology, 34(1):203 -- 215, 1995.
[FS92] M. Furuta and B. Steer. Seifert fibred homology 3-spheres and the Yang-Mills equations
on Riemann surfaces with marked points. Adv. Math., 96(1):38 -- 102, 1992.
[HN75] G. Harder and M. S. Narasimhan. On the cohomology groups of moduli spaces of vector
[HS]
bundles on curves. Math. Ann., 212:215 -- 248, 1974/75.
V. Hoskins and F. Schaffhauser. Rational points of quiver moduli spaces. Ann. Inst.
Fourier (Grenoble), To appear:46 pages. arXiv 1704.08624.
[HS19] V. Hoskins and F. Schaffhauser. Group actions on quiver varieties and applications. In-
ternat. J. Math., 30(2):1950007, 46, 2019.
[LS13] C. C. M. Liu and F. Schaffhauser. The Yang-Mills equations over Klein surfaces. J. Topol.,
6(3):569 -- 643, 2013.
[MS80] V. B. Mehta and C. S. Seshadri. Moduli of vector bundles on curves with parabolic
structures. Math. Ann., 248(3):205 -- 239, 1980.
[Mum63] D. Mumford. Projective invariants of projective structures and applications. In Proc.
Internat. Congr. Mathematicians (Stockholm, 1962), pages 526 -- 530. Inst. Mittag-Leffler,
Djursholm, 1963.
[NS64] M. S. Narasimhan and C. S. Seshadri. Holomorphic vector bundles on a compact Riemann
surface. Math. Ann., 155:69 -- 80, 1964.
[NS65] M. S. Narasimhan and C. S. Seshadri. Stable and unitary vector bundles on a compact
Riemann surface. Ann. of Math. (2), 82:540 -- 567, 1965.
[Råd92] J. Råde. On the Yang-Mills heat equation in two and three dimensions. J. Reine Angew.
Math., 431:123 -- 163, 1992.
[Ram75] A. Ramanathan. Stable principal bundles on a compact Riemann surface. Math. Ann.,
213:129 -- 152, 1975.
[Ram81] S. Ramanan. Orthogonal and spin bundles over hyperelliptic curves. Proc. Indian Acad.
Sci. Math. Sci., 90(2):151 -- 166, 1981.
[RS88] A. Ramanathan and S. Subramanian. Einstein-Hermitian connections on principal bun-
dles and stability. J. Reine Angew. Math., 390:21 -- 31, 1988.
[Sch12] F. Schaffhauser. Real points of coarse moduli schemes of vector bundles on a real algebraic
curve. J. Symplectic Geom., 10(4):503 -- 534, 2012.
[Sch17] F. Schaffhauser. On the Narasimhan-Seshadri correspondence for Real and Quaternionic
vector bundles. J. Differential Geom., 105(1):119 -- 162, 2017.
[Ses67] C. S. Seshadri. Space of unitary vector bundles on a compact Riemann surface. Ann. of
Math. (2), 85:303 -- 336, 1967.
24
FLORENT SCHAFFHAUSER
[Sin59]
I. M. Singer. The geometric interpretation of a special connection. Pacific J. Math.,
9:585 -- 590, 1959.
Departamento de Matemáticas, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
E-mail address: [email protected]
|
1103.5826 | 2 | 1103 | 2011-08-09T08:23:24 | About the computation of the signature of surface singularities z^N+g(x,y)=0 | [
"math.AG"
] | In this article we describe our experiences with a parallel SINGULAR-implementation of the signature of a surface singularity defined by z^N+g(x,y)=0. | math.AG | math |
ABOUT THE COMPUTATION OF THE SIGNATURE OF
SURFACE SINGULARITIES zN + g(x, y) = 0
MUHAMMAD AHSAN BANYAMIN, GERHARD PFISTER, AND STEFAN STEIDEL
Abstract. In this article we describe our experiences with a parallel Sin-
gular -- implementation of the signature of a surface singularity defined by
zN + g(x, y) = 0.
1. Introduction
Let g ∈ C[x, y] define an isolated curve singularity at 0 ∈ C2 and f := zN +g(x, y)
for N ≥ 2. The zero -- set V := V (f ) ⊆ C3 of f has an isolated singularity at 0.
For a small ε > 0 let Vε := V (f − ε) ⊆ C3 be the Milnor fibre of (V, 0) and
s : H2(Vε, R) × H2(Vε, R) −→ R be the intersection form (cf.
[1], [10], [11], [18]).
H2(Vε, R) is a µ -- dimensional R -- vector space, µ the Milnor number of (V, 0) (cf.
[1], [7], [8], [9]), and s is a symmetric bilinear form. Let σ(f ) be the signature of
s, called the signature of the surface singularity (V, 0). Formulas to compute the
signature are given by N´emethi (cf. [13], [14]) and van Doorn, Steenbrink (cf. [4]).
We have implemented three approaches in Singular (cf.
[3], [6]) using Puiseux
expansions, the resolution of singularities and the spectral pairs of the singularity.
In section 2 we will explain the different formulas to compute the signature, and
finally we give examples and timings of our implementation in section 3.
2. The signature of (V, 0) in terms of N and g
The proofs of the following formulas (cf. Propositions 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 and 2.7) can
be found in the corresponding papers of N´emethi (cf. [13], [14]).
2.1. Approach 1: Puiseux Pairs. For the first approach assume that (V (g), 0) ⊆
(C2, 0) is the germ of an irreducible curve singularity. Let (m1, n1), . . . , (mℓ, nℓ) be
the Puiseux pairs of g and define a sequence {ai}i=1,...,ℓ by
a1 = m1
and
ai+1 = mi+1 − ni+1 · (mi − ni · ai).
Moreover, we set dℓ = 1 and di = gcd(N, ni+1 · · · nℓ) for 1 ≤ i < ℓ.
Proposition 2.1. σ(f ) = Pℓ
i=1 di · σ (cid:0)xai + yni + zN/di(cid:1).
The signature of a Brieskorn polynomial xc1 + yc2 + zc3 can be computed com-
< t + 1}
binatorially. Let St = #{(k1, k2, k3) ∈ Z3 1 ≤ kj ≤ aj − 1, t < P3
for t ∈ N0.
Proposition 2.2. σ(xc1 + yc2 + zc3) = S0 − S1 + S2.
kj
aj
j=1
Date: November 4, 2018.
Key words and phrases. signature, surface singularity, intersection form, Seifert form, eta --
invariant.
Part of the work was done at ASSMS, GCU Lahore -- Pakistan.
1
Remark 2.3. The Singular implementation of the first approach bases on the
procedure invariants (cf.
library hnoether.lib) to obtain the Puiseux pairs of
g. The command list L = invariants(g);1 provides a list L in which the third
and fourth entry contain the necessary data for our application. The required
combinatorics of Proposition 2.1 resp. 2.2 had to be implemented in spring 2011.
2.2. Approach 2: Resolution. In the following (V (g), 0) doesn't need to be irre-
ducible. For the second approach we use the resolution of the singularity (V (g), 0).
Let V = W ` A be the vertices of the resolution graph, W the vertices correspond-
ing to the exceptional divisors and A the vertices corresponding to the resolved
branches. Let E = {(v1, v2) v1, v2 ∈ V} be the set of edges of the resolution
graph. Let {mv}v∈W be the sequence of total multiplicities and set ma = 1 if
a ∈ A. For w ∈ W let Mw = gcd(mv v ∈ Vw ∪ {w}) and for e = (v1, v2) ∈ E let
me = gcd(mv1 , mv2 ).
Proposition 2.4. σ(zN + g) = η(g, N ) − N · η(g, 1) and 2
η(g, K) =#(A) − 1 + X
(cid:0) gcd(K, me) − 1(cid:1) − X
(cid:0) gcd(K, Mw) − 1(cid:1)
e∈E
w∈W
+ 4 · X
X
w∈W
w has more
than 2 edges
v∈V
(v,w)∈E
mw
X
k=1
((
k · mv
mw
)) · ((
k · K
mw
)).
Moreover, it holds Pe∈E (cid:0) gcd(K, me) − 1(cid:1) = Pw∈W (cid:0) gcd(K, Mw) − 1(cid:1) if (V (g), 0)
is irreducible.
Remark 2.5. The Singular implementation of the second approach bases on
the procedure totalmultiplicities (cf.
library alexpoly.lib) to obtain nec-
essary information about the resolution of (V (g), 0). The command list L =
totalmultiplicities(g); provides a list L of the following format: L[1]:
in-
cidence matrix of the resolution graph, L[2]: list of the sequences of the total mul-
tiplicities corresponding to the branches, L[3]: list of the multiplicity sequences of
the branches. The required combinatorics of Proposition 2.4 had to be implemented
in spring 2011.
2.3. Approach 3: Spectral Pairs. The third approach uses the spectral pairs 3
of the singularity (V (g), 0). Therefore let
Spp(g) = X
h1+[−α],w+sα−1−[−α]
exp(−2πiα)
· (α, w)
(α,w)
represent the spectral pairs where sα = 0 if α /∈ Z and sα = 1 if α ∈ Z, and
Sp(g) = P(α,w)∈Spp(g)(α) be the spectrum of g.
1The command list L = invariants(g); returns a list L of the following format: L[1]: char-
acteristic exponents, L[2]: generators of the semigroup, L[3]: first components of Puiseux pairs,
L[4]: second components of Puiseux pairs, L[5]: degree of the conductor, L[6]: sequence of
multiplicities.
2For x ∈ Q we denote by {x} the fractional part of x and
((x)) = (cid:26) {x} − 1
2 ,
0,
if x /∈ Z
if x ∈ Z
.
The definition of the eta -- invariant η(f, K) can be found in [12].
3A definition of spectral pairs can be found in [9].
2
Remark 2.6. Note that α is a spectral number, i.e. exp(−2πiα) is an eigenvalue
of the monodromy. (V (g), 0) is reducible if and only if 0 is a spectral number (cf.
[4]). The spectral numbers are situated in the interval (−1, 1) and the spectrum is
symmetric (α is a spectral number if and only if −α is a spectral number, cf. [9]).
If the Newton polygon of g is non -- degenerate the spectral pairs can be computed
combinatorially using the Newton polygon (cf.
[16], [19]). There is a formula to
compute the spectral pairs from the data of the resolution (cf. [17]).
Proposition 2.7. σ(zN + g) = η(g, N ) − N · η(g, 1) and
η(g, K) = X
exp(−2πiα) − 2 X
h11
h1+[−α],w+sα−1−[−α]
exp(−2πiα)
(1 − 2{Kα}).
α6=0,Kα∈Z
(α,2)∈Spp(g)
α≥0,Kα /∈Z
(α,w)∈Spp(g)
Remark 2.8. The Singular implementation of the third approach bases on the pro-
cedure sppairs (cf. library gmssing.lib) to obtain the spectral pairs of (V (g), 0).
The command list L = sppairs(g); provides a list L of the following format:
L[1]: set of spectral numbers {α1, . . . , αr}, L[2]: set of weights {w1, . . . , wr},
L[3]: set of multiplicities {h1, . . . , hr} such that Spp(g) = Pr
j=1 hj · (αj, wj). The
required combinatorics of Proposition 2.7 had to be implemented in spring 2011.
2.4. Theoretical Comparison. The topological type of a plane curve singularity
defined by g(x, y) = 0 can be described by the Puiseux pairs (Approach 1) of the
branches and their intersection multiplicities or equivalently by discrete invariants
of the resolution (Approach 2) There are combinatorial formulas to get from one
description to another (cf. [7]). Moreover, the spectral pairs (Approach 3) which are
topological invariants introduced by Arnold (cf. [1]) and Steenbrink (cf. [19]) can
also be computed combinatorially from the resolution data (cf. [17]). Consequently,
all of the three approaches to compute the signature of the surface zN + g(x, y) = 0
as described above are based on the knowledge of three different finite sets of invari-
ants which are related in a combinatorial way. The essential difference concerning
these approaches is the method to compute the set of the corresponding invariants.
The spectral pairs (Approach 3) can be computed from the mixed Hodge struc-
ture. This requires several standard basis computations of certain modules over lo-
cal rings which is the bottleneck of this approach. The Singular library
gmssing.lib is designed for computing the mixed Hodge structure for hypersurface
singularities of any dimension. This is one reason why computing the spectral pairs
using this method is usually comparatively slow.
The Puiseux pairs (Approach 1) of the branches and their intersection multiplic-
ities resp. the resolution graph (Approach 2) and the multiplicity sequence can be
computed via Hamburger -- Noether expansion (cf. [2]) or resolution of the curve sin-
gularities. Hence, both approaches are similarly time -- consuming. They only need
Grobner basis computations if field extensions of Q are necessary to compute the
Hamburger -- Noether expansion resp. the resolution. Anyway, the field extensions
are the bottlenecks of these approaches.
3
3. Examples and timings
In this section we provide examples on which we time the three approaches
as described in section 2 to compute the signature of a surface singularity zN +
g(x, y) = 0. The corresponding procedures are implemented in Singular in the
library surfacesignature.lib. Timings are conducted by using Singular 3-1-3
on an Intel R(cid:13) Xeon R(cid:13) X5460 with 4 CPUs, 3.16 GHz each, 64 GB RAM under the
Gentoo Linux operating system.
Example 3.1. We consider the following polynomials:
g1 = x15 − 21x14 + 8x13y − 6x13 − 16x12y + 20x11y2 − x12 + 8x11y − 36x10y2
+ 24x9y3 + 4x9y2 − 16x8y3 + 26x7y4 − 6x6y4 + 8x5y5 + 4x3y6 − y8,
1 + x17y17,
g2 = g3
g3 = (cid:0)y4 + 2x3y2 + x6 + x5y(cid:1)3
g4 = g5
1 + x20y20,
g5 = x10 + 7y10,
g6 = x20 + 5y20.
+ x17y17,
The curve singularities in (C2, 0) defined by g1 resp. g2 resp. g3 are analytically
irreducible with Puiseux pairs (3, 2), (7, 2), (15, 2) resp. (3, 2), (7, 2), (15, 2), (67, 3)
resp. (3, 2), (7, 2), (113, 3).
The curve singularities in (C2, 0) defined by g4 resp. g5 resp. g6 are analytically
reducible since they are intersections of 40 resp. 10 resp. 20 lines at the origin.
Consequently, the first approach is not applicable for these examples. Furthermore,
the polynomials g4, g5, g6 are defined over Q, whereas the resolution is only defined
in field extensions of degree 8 resp. 10 resp. 20 over Q.
Computations reveal the following results and corresponding timings which are
summarized in Table 1. The symbol "> 14 h" indicates that the computation did
not terminate after more than 14 hours. All timings are given in seconds (s).
N gi σ(zN + gi(x, y)) Approach 1 [s] Approach 2 [s] Approach 3 [s]
5 g1
> 14 h
> 14 h
5 g2
> 14 h
6 g3
> 14 h
5 g4
6 g5
0
8
6 g6
−168
−1620
−940
−3192
−189
−779
0
183
2912
19
22
14542
0
174
2908
--
--
--
Table 1. Results and total running times for computing the sig-
nature of the surface singularity given by the considered examples
(cf. Example 3.1) via all approaches as described in section 2.
In addition, we summarize the maximal memory allocated from system during
the considered computations in Table 2. The memory consumption is given in
Megabyte (MB).
4
N gi Approach 1 [MB] Approach 2 [MB] Approach 3 [MB]
> 300
5 g1
> 1100
5 g2
> 1100
6 g3
5 g4
> 2300
4
6 g5
6 g6
72
1
3442
7723
--
--
--
1
3442
7723
33
8
156
Table 2. Maximal memory allocated from system while comput-
ing the signature of the surface singularity given by the considered
examples (cf. Example 3.1) via all approaches as described in sec-
tion 2.
Remark 3.2 (Algorithmic Conclusion). Our experiments reveal that there exist
examples where Approach 1 and Approach 2 are almost equivalent regarding time
consumption resp. memory allocation, but Approach 3 is much slower (cf. g1, g2,
g3). Furthermore, there exist examples where Approach 1 is not applicable, but
Approach 2 consumes more time resp. allocates more memory than Approach 3
(cf. g4), and vice versa (cf. g5, g6). Consequently, it is reasonable to summarize
all approaches in one algorithm which computes the signature via every approach,
if possible, in parallel such that the fastest approach wins and returns the result.
References
[1] Arnold, V.I.; Gusein-Zade, S.M.; Varchenko, A.N.: Singularities of Differentiable Mappings.
Vol. 1,2, Birkhauser (1988).
[2] Campillo, A.: Algebroid Curves in Positive Characteristics. Lecture Notes in Mathematics
813, Springer (1980).
[3] Decker, W.; Greuel, G.-M.; Pfister, G.; Schonemann, H.: Singular 3-1-3 -- A computer
algebra system for polynomial computations. http://www.singular.uni-kl.de (2011).
[4] van Doorn, M.G.M.; Steenbrink, J.H.M.: A supplement to the monodromy theorem. Abh.
Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 59, 225 -- 233 (1989).
[5] Durfee, A.H.: The Signature of Smoothings of Complex Surface Singularities. Mathematische
Annalen 232, 85 -- 98 (1978).
[6] Greuel, G.-M.; Pfister, G.: A Singular Introduction to Commutative Algebra. Second edi-
tion, Springer (2007).
[7] de Jong, T.; Pfister, G.: Local Analytic Geometry. Vieweg (2000).
[8] Kerner, D.; N´emethi, A.: The Milnor fibre signature is not semi-continous. arXiv:0907.5252
(2009).
[9] Kulikov, V.S.: Mixed Hodge Structures and Singularities. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics
132, Cambridge University Press (1998).
[10] Milnor, J.: Singular points of complex hypersurfaces. Annals of Mathematics Studies Number
61, Princeton University Press (1968).
[11] N´emethi, A.: The real Seifert form and the spectral pairs of isolated hypersurface singularities.
Compositio Mathematica 98, 23 -- 41 (1995).
[12] N´emethi, A.: The equivariant signature of hypersurface singularities and eta -- invariant. Topol-
ogy, Vol. 34, No. 2, 243 -- 259 (1995).
[13] N´emethi, A.: Dedekind sums and the signature of f (x, y) + zN . Selecta Mathematica, New
series, Vol. 4, 361 -- 376 (1998).
[14] N´emethi, A.: The Signature of f (x, y) + zN . Proceedings of Real and Complex Singularities
(C.T.C. Wall's 60th birthday meeting, Liverpool (England), August 1996), London Math.
Soc. Lecture Notes Series 263, 131 -- 149 (1999).
5
[15] N´emethi, A.; Steenbrink, J.H.M.: On the monodromy of curve singularities. Mathematische
Zeitschrift 223, 587 -- 593 (1996).
[16] Saito, M.: Exponents and Newton Polyhedra of Isolated Hypersurface Singularities. Mathe-
matische Annalen 281, 411 -- 417 (1978).
[17] Schrauwen, R.; Steenbrink, J.H.M.; Stevens, J.: Spectral Pairs and the Topology of Curve
Singularities. AMS Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics 53, 305 -- 328 (1991).
[18] Steenbrink, J.H.M.: Intersection form for quasi -- homogeneous singularities. Compositio Math-
ematica 34(2), 211 -- 223 (1977).
[19] Steenbrink, J.H.M.: Mixed Hodge structure on the vanishing cohomology. In: P. Holm (ed.),
Real and Complex Singularities (Oslo, 1976), Proc. Nordic Summer School, Sijthoff & No-
ordhoff, 525 -- 563 (1977).
Muhammad Ahsan Banyamin, Abdus Salam School of Mathematical Sciences, GC Uni-
versity, Lahore, 68-B, New Muslim Town, Lahore 54600, Pakistan
E-mail address: [email protected]
Gerhard Pfister, Department of Mathematics, University of Kaiserslautern, Erwin-
Schrodinger-Str., 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
E-mail address: [email protected]
URL: http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/∼pfister
Stefan Steidel, Department of Mathematics, University of Kaiserslautern, Erwin-
Schrodinger-Str., 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
E-mail address: [email protected]
URL: http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/∼steidel
6
|
1307.3763 | 3 | 1307 | 2016-03-17T04:32:48 | The weak ordinarity conjecture and $F$-singularities | [
"math.AG",
"math.AC"
] | Recently M. Mustata and V. Srinivas related a natural conjecture about the Frobenius action on the cohomology of the structure sheaf after reduction to characteristic $p > 0$ with another conjecture connecting multiplier ideals and test ideals. We generalize this relation to the case of singular ambient varieties. Additionally, we connect these results to a conjecture relating $F$-injective and Du Bois singularities. Finally, using an unpublished result of Gabber, we also show that $F$-injective and Du Bois singularities have a common definition in terms of smooth hypercovers. | math.AG | math |
The weak ordinarity conjecture and F -singularities
Bhargav Bhatt, Karl Schwede, and Shunsuke Takagi
Abstract.
Recently M. Mustat¸a and V. Srinivas related a natural conjecture
about the Frobenius action on the cohomology of the structure sheaf
after reduction to characteristic p > 0 with another conjecture con-
necting multiplier ideals and test ideals. We generalize this relation to
the case of singular ambient varieties. Additionally, we connect these
results to a conjecture relating F -injective and Du Bois singularities.
Finally, using an unpublished result of Gabber, we also show that F -
injective and Du Bois singularities have a common definition in terms
of smooth hypercovers.
§1.
Introduction
In [MS10, Mus10] Mustat¸a and Srinivas related a very natural open
problem on ordinarity of smooth projective varieties after reduction to
characteristic p > 0, with another open question on the connection be-
tween multiplier ideals and test ideals after reduction to characteristic
p > 0.
We need some notation to state these conjectures. Let X be a
scheme of finite type over a field k of characteristic zero. Choosing
a suitable finitely generated Z-subalgebra A of k, we can construct a
scheme XA of finite type over A such that XA ⊗A k ∼= X. We refer
XA as a model of X over A and denote by Xs the fiber of XA over
a closed point s ∈ Spec A. See the paragraph just before Proposition
2.11 for more details on reducing from characteristic zero to positive
characteristic. The first of the conjectures is then stated as follows.
Conjecture 1.1. (The weak ordinarity conjecture [MS10, Conjec-
ture 1.1]) Let V be an n-dimensional smooth projective variety over a
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 14F18, 13A35, 14J17, 14B05,
14F20.
Key words and phrases. multiplier ideal, test ideal, Du Bois, F -injective,
ordinary variety.
2
B. Bhatt, K. Schwede, and S. Takagi
field k of characteristic zero. Given a model of V over a finitely gener-
ated Z-subalgebra A of k, there exists a Zariski-dense set of closed points
S ⊆ Spec A such that the action induced by Frobenius on H n(Vs, OVs)
is bijective for every s ∈ S.
Since the ordinarity of Vs in the sense of [BK86] implies that the
action of Frobenius on H n(Vs, OVs) is bijective (see [MS10, Remark 5.1])
and the converse does not hold in general (see [JR03, Example 5.7]), we
call Conjecture 1.1 as the weak ordinarity conjecture.
Remark 1.2. As pointed out in [MS10, Remark 5.2], if Conjecture
1.1 holds, then we can also find a dense set of closed points S ⊆ Spec A
that satisfies the condition of the conjecture for any set of finitely many
varieties X (i) over k.
In order to prove Conjecture 1.1 it is sufficient to assume that k
is algebraically closed.
Indeed, the reduction to characteristic p > 0
process does not care differentiate between X and X ×k k. Hence we
assume that k is algebraically closed as necessary.
We now state a variant of the conjectured relationship between test
ideals and multiplier ideals under reduction to characteristic p > 0.
The difference between this conjecture and the one presented in [MS10,
Mus10] is that X is not smooth and we also include a boundary Q-divisor
∆.
Conjecture 1.3. (A generalization to singular X of [MS10, Conjec-
ture 1.2]) Let X be a normal variety over a field k of characteristic zero.
Suppose that ∆ is a Q-divisor on X such that KX + ∆ is Q-Cartier, and
a is a nonzero ideal on X. Given a model of (X, ∆, a) over a finitely
generated Z-subalgebra A of k, there exists a Zariski-dense set of closed
points S ⊆ Spec A such that
(1.3.1)
τ (Xs, ∆s, a
λ
s ) = J (X, ∆, a
λ)s
for all λ ∈ R≥0 and all s ∈ S. Furthermore, if we have finitely many
triples (Xi, ∆i, ai) as above and corresponding models over A, then there
is a dense subset of closed points in Spec A such that (1.3.1) holds for
each of these triples.
Our first main result generalizes the main result of [MS10].
Theorem A. (Theorem 5.3) Conjecture 1.3 holds if and only if
Conjecture 1.1 holds.
It is worth noting that we do not employ semi-stable reduction, the
use of which was the key obstruction to generalizing the results of [MS10]
to the case of singular varieties.
The weak ordinarity conjecture and F -singularities
3
We also explore the relation between F -injective and Du Bois singu-
larities from two different perspectives. Du Bois singularities are Hodge
theoretic in origin, and were coined by Steenbrink [Ste81] based upon
the work of Deligne and Du Bois [Del74, Du 81]. Roughly speaking,
Du Bois singularities are the local condition on a proper variety over C
that naturally guarantees that the map H i(X an, C) → H i(X an, OX an )
is surjective for all i > 0 (see [Kov12] for additional discussion). On
the other hand, a variety X in characteristic p > 0 is called F -injective
if for every point x ∈ X, the Frobenius map on the local cohomology
module H i
x(OX,x) is injective for each i. It is a result of
the second author [Sch09] that if X has dense F -injective type1 then
X has Du Bois singularities. We point out that once Conjecture 1.1 is
assumed, it easily follows from the methods of [MS10] that the converse
holds as well. In fact, we even have the following:
x(OX,x) → H i
Theorem B. (Theorem 4.2) Conjecture 1.1 holds if and only if for
every Du Bois scheme of finite type over a field of characteristic zero
has dense F -injective type.
We also give a philosophical explanation for why F -injective and Du
Bois singularities are related: they have a common definition.
Theorem C. (Theorem 4.8) Suppose that X is a reduced scheme
of finite type over a field k. Then for any proper hypercover with smooth
terms π q : X q → X, consider the canonical map
(1.3.2)
H i
z(OX ) → Hi
z(R(π q )∗OX q )
for each i and each closed point z ∈ X.
•
•
Suppose k is of characteristic zero, then X has Du Bois singu-
larities if and only if (1.3.2) injects for each π q , i and z.
Suppose k is of characteristic p > 0 and F -finite, then X has
F -injective singularities if and only if (1.3.2) injects for each
π q , i and z.
In characteristic zero, this is not new. It was observed by Kov´acs in
[Kov99] (in fact, the map (1.3.2) is always surjective by [KS11a]). The
proof of Theorem C relies on an unpublished result of O. Gabber. To
explain this result, note first that the direct limit of R(π q )∗OX q over
all proper hypercovers of X computes the (derived) pushforward of the
sheafification of O for Voevodsky's h-topology down to the Zariski topol-
ogy. Work of Deligne and Du Bois (see also [HJ13, Lee07]), which lies at
1meaning its reduction to positive characteristic is F -injective for a Zariski-
dense set of closed points S ⊆ Spec A. See Definition 2.12 for the detail.
4
B. Bhatt, K. Schwede, and S. Takagi
the heart of Kov´acs' observation mentioned above, identifies this push-
forward in characteristic zero: it can be computed as the pushforward of
the structure sheaf from any fixed proper hypercover with smooth terms
of X. Gabber's result simply gives the characteristic p counterpart of
this identification:
Theorem D (O. Gabber, Theorem 3.3). The h-sheafification of
the structure sheaf in characteristic p coincides with its perfection, and
this identification extends to cohomology. In particular, for any excellent
characteristic p scheme X and any i ≥ 0, one has a natural isomorphism
H i(X q , OX q ) ≃ lim
lim
→
→ (cid:16)H i(X, OX ) F ∗
→ H i(X, OX ) → . . .(cid:17).
Here the limit runs over all proper hypercovers π q : X q → X, and F ∗
denotes the pullback along the Frobenius endomorphism of X.
→ H i(X, OX ) F ∗
Acknowledgements: The authors thank O. Gabber for explaining his above
result to us and allowing us to include it in this work. The authors would
like to thank Manuel Blickle, S´andor Kov´acs, Shrawan Kumar, Vikram Mehta,
Mircea Mustat¸a and Kevin Tucker for useful discussions. We would like to thank
Christohper Hacon and Linquan Ma for pointing out a mistake in our original
proof of Lemma 3.9. We also thank the referee for many useful comments. The
first author was partially supported by the NSF grants DMS #1128155 and
DMS #1340424. The second author was partially supported by the NSF grant
DMS #1064485, NSF FRG Grant DMS #1265261/1501115, NSF CAREER
Grant DMS #1252860/1501102 and by a Sloan Fellowship. The third author
was partially supported by Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) 23740024 and
for Scientific Research (C) 26400039 from JSPS. The material is based upon
work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0932078
000, initiated while the authors were in residence at the Mathematical Science
Research Institute (MSRI) in Berkeley, California, during the spring semester
2013.
§2. Preliminaries
Throughout this paper, all schemes are Noetherian and all mor-
phisms of schemes are separated. In this language, a variety is a reduced
irreducible algebraic scheme of finite type over a field.
We first recall definitions of multiplier ideals and modules. Our main
reference for this is [Laz04].
Definition 2.1 (Multiplier ideals and modules). Suppose that X is
a normal variety over a field of characteristic zero. Further, suppose that
The weak ordinarity conjecture and F -singularities
5
∆ is an effective Q-divisor, a is an ideal sheaf and t ≥ 0 is a real number.
Let π : Y → X be a proper birational morphism with Y normal such
that a · OY = OY (−G) is invertible, and we assume that KX and KY
agree wherever π is an isomorphism.
(a)
If KX + ∆ is Q-Cartier, we assume that π is a log resolution
of (X, KX + ∆, a). Then we define the multiplier ideal to be
J (X, ∆, a
t) = π∗OY (⌈KY − π∗(KX + ∆) − tG⌉) ⊆ OX .
(b)
If ∆ is Q-Cartier, we assume that π is a log resolution of
(X, ∆, a). Then we define the multiplier module to be
J (ωX , ∆, a
t) = π∗OY (⌈KY − π∗∆ − tG⌉) ⊆ ωX .
Both of these objects are independent of the choice of a resolution. If ∆
is not effective, one can still define the multiplier ideal and module by
the same formulas as above, and they are then fractional ideals.
Remark 2.2. In characteristic p > 0 and even in mixed characteris-
tic, we will frequently be in the situation where we also have a fixed log
resolution π : Y → X of all the relevant terms. In such a situation, we
will use J (X, ∆, at) and J (ωX , ∆, at) to denote the multiplier ideal and
modules with respect to that fixed log resolution.
Lemma 2.3. With notation as above:
(i) J (X, ∆, at) = J (ωX , KX + ∆, at).
(ii)
If D is a Cartier divisor, then
J (X, ∆ + D, a
t) = J (X, ∆, a
t) ⊗ OX (−D).
(iii)
Suppose that f : Y → X is a finite surjective morphism with
Y normal. Let Ramf denote the ramification divisor of f and
Trf : f∗K(Y ) → K(X) the trace map. Then
J (X, ∆, at) = Trf (cid:0)f∗J (Y, π∗∆ − Ramf , (aOY )t)(cid:1)
= (cid:0)f∗J (Y, π∗∆ − Ramf , (aOY )t)(cid:1) ∩ K(X),
J (ωX , ∆, at) = Trf (cid:0)f∗J (ωY , π∗∆, (aOY )t)(cid:1)
= (cid:0)f∗J (ωY , π∗∆, (aOY )t)(cid:1) ∩ K(X).
We now recall the definitions of test ideals and modules. The reader
is referred to [BSTZ10] and [ST12] for details.
Definition 2.4. Suppose that X is an algebraic variety over an F -
finite field of characteristic p > 0. Further, suppose that ∆ is an effective
Q-divisor, a is an ideal sheaf and t ≥ 0 is a real number. Let F e : X → X
denote the eth iteration of the absolute Frobenius morphism.
6
B. Bhatt, K. Schwede, and S. Takagi
(a) We define the test ideal τ (X, ∆, at) to be the smallest nonzero
ideal sheaf J ⊆ OX which satisfies the following condition lo-
cally. For every e ≥ 0 and every map
φ ∈ H omOX (F e
∗ OX (⌈(pe − 1)∆⌉), OX ),
we have
φ(cid:0)F e
∗ (a
⌈t(pe−1)⌉J)(cid:1) ⊆ J.
(b)
Suppose that (pe0 −1)∆ is Cartier for some e0 (this is equivalent
to requiring that ∆ is Q-Cartier and p does not divide the index
of ∆). We define the test module τ (ωX , ∆, at) to be the smallest
nonzero submodule J ⊆ ωX satisfying the following condition.
For all positive multiples e of e0, we have
∗(cid:0)a
T e(cid:0)F e
⌈t(pe−1)⌉ · OX ((1 − pe)∆) · J(cid:1)(cid:1) ⊆ J,
where T e : F e
∗ ωX → ωX is Grothendieck's trace map.
Remark 2.5. It is also easy to define τ (ωX , ∆, at) when the index of
∆ is divisible by p. The above definition will be simplest for us though.
Test ideals and modules are special types of Cartier modules.
Definition 2.6 (Cartier modules, [BB11]). Recall that a Cartier
module is a coherent OX -module M with a given map φ : F e
∗ (M ⊗ L ) →
M for some line bundle L and integer e ≥ 0. A Cartier module (M, φ)
is called F -pure if φ is surjective.
Note that given a Cartier module (M, φ : F e
∗ (M ⊗ L ) → M ) we can
form a map
φ2 : F 2e
∗ (M ⊗ L 1+pe
)
and more generally maps
∗ (φ⊗L )
F e
−−−−−−→ F e
∗ (M ⊗ L )
φ
−→ M
(2.6.1) φn : F ne
∗ (M ⊗ L 1+pe+...+p(n−1)e
) → · · · → F e
∗ (M ⊗ L )
φ
−→ M.
In this way, we can construct Cartier modules (M, φn) for each integer
n > 0.
Definition 2.7. Given a Cartier module (M, φ), we use the notation
)(cid:1) ⊆ M for
σ(M, φ) to denote the image φn(cid:0)F ne
∗ (M ⊗ L 1+pe+...+p(n−1)e
n ≫ 0. This image stabilizes by [HS77, Gab04] so it is well defined. It
is the unique largest F -pure Cartier submodule of (M, φ).
The weak ordinarity conjecture and F -singularities
7
Remark 2.8. The test submodule τ (ωX , f
a
pe−1 ) is an F -pure Cartier
Tr−→ ωX.
module under the map F e
In fact, it is the
unique smallest nonzero Cartier submodule of ωX with respect to this
map.
∗ ωX
×f a
−−−→ F e
∗ ωX
We now recall some other properties of test ideals and modules.
Lemma 2.9. With notation as above:
τ (X, ∆, at) = τ (ωX , KX + ∆, at).
(i)
(ii)
If D is a Cartier divisor then
τ (X, ∆ + D, a
t) = τ (X, ∆, a
t) ⊗ OX (−D).
(iii)
([ST10]) Suppose that f : Y → X is a finite surjective separable
morphism with Y normal. Let Ramf denote the ramification
divisor of f and Trf : f∗K(Y ) → K(X) the trace map. Then
τ (X, ∆, at) = Trf (cid:0)f∗τ (Y, π∗∆ − Ramf , (aOY )t)(cid:1),
τ (ωX , ∆, at) = Trf (cid:0)f∗τ (ωY , π∗∆, (aOY )t)(cid:1).
Furthermore if Trf (f∗OY ) = OX (for example, if the degree
[K(Y ) : K(X)]) is not divisible by p), then
τ (X, ∆, at) = (cid:0)f∗τ (Y, π∗∆ − Ramf , (aOY )t)(cid:1) ∩ K(X),
τ (ωX , ∆, at) = (cid:0)f∗τ (ωY , π∗∆, (aOY )t)(cid:1) ∩ K(X).
Remark 2.10. By using Lemma 2.9 (ii), we can define τ (X, ∆, at) for
non-effective ∆ as follows. Write ∆ = E − D where E is an effective Q-
divisor and D is an effective Cartier divisor (locally if necessary). Then
τ (X, ∆, at) = τ (X, E, at) ⊗ OX (D) ⊆ K(X). This is easily seen to be
independent of the decomposition ∆ = E − D.
We now recall how test ideals and modules behave under reduction
to characteristic zero. We refer to the sources [MS10, Section 2.2] and
[HH06] for a detailed description of the process of reduction to charac-
teristic zero.
Let X be a scheme of finite type over a field k of characteristic
zero and Z ( X be a closed subscheme. Choosing a suitable finitely
generated Z-subalgebra A of k, we can construct a scheme XA of finite
type over A and a closed subscheme ZA ( XA such that
(ZA ֒→ XA) ⊗A k ∼= Z ֒→ X.
We can enlarge A by localizing at a single nonzero element and replacing
XA and ZA with the corresponding open subschemes. Thus, applying
8
B. Bhatt, K. Schwede, and S. Takagi
the generic freeness [HH06, (2.1.4)], we may assume that XA and ZA are
flat over Spec A. We refer to (XA, ZA) as a model of (X, Z) over A. If
Z is defined by an ideal sheaf a, then we denote by aA the defining ideal
sheaf of ZA. If Z is a prime divisor on X, then possibly enlarging A, we
may assume that ZA is a prime divisor on XA. When ∆ = Pi diDi is a
Q-divisor on X, let ∆A := Pi diDi,A.
the fiber of XA (resp. ZA, aA, Di,A) over s and denote ∆s := Pi tiDi,s.
Given a closed point s ∈ Spec A, we denote by Xs (resp. Zs, as, Di,s)
Then Xs is a scheme of finite type over the residue field κ(s) of s, which
is a finite field of characteristic p(s). After enlarging A if necessarily, the
Di,s are prime divisors and ∆s is a Q-divisor on Xs for all closed points
s ∈ Spec A.
Proposition 2.11 ([HY03, ST08, Tak04]). Suppose that (X, ∆, at)
is a triple defined over a field k of characteristic zero. Suppose A ⊆ k is
a finitely generated Z-subalgebra over which (X, ∆, at) can be spread out
to (XA, ∆A, at
A). Then there exists a nonempty open subset S ⊆ Spec A
(over which for example a log resolution of (XA, ∆A, at
A) is defined) such
that for every closed point s ∈ S, if KX + ∆ is Q-Cartier, then
J (X, ∆, a
t)s = τ (Xs, ∆s, a
t
s),
and if ∆ is Q-Cartier, then
J (ωX , ∆, a
t)s = τ (ωXs , ∆s, a
t
s).
We define F -injective and Du Bois singularities. For a survey of Du
Bois singularities with more detailed explanations, see [KS11b].
Definition 2.12 (F -injective singularities, [Fed83]). Let X be a
scheme of characteristic p > 0. Then we say that X has F -injective sin-
gularities if for each z ∈ X, the Frobenius map H i
z(F∗OX,z)
is injective for all i ∈ Z. By local duality, in the case that X is F -finite,
this is equivalent to requiring that h−iF∗ω q
X surjects for all
i ∈ Z. Again in the case that X is F -finite, by the above observation, it
is sufficient to check only z closed points.
z(OX,z) → H i
X → h−iω q
Suppose that X is a scheme of finite type over a field k of charac-
teristic zero. Then we say that X has dense F -injective type if there
exist a model of X over a finitely generated Z-subalgebra A of k and
a Zariski-dense set of closed points S ⊆ Spec A such that Xs has F -
injective singularities for all s ∈ S.
Definition 2.13 (Du Bois singularities, [Du 81, Ste81]). Let X be a
reduced scheme of finite type over a field of characteristic zero. Following
the notation of [Du 81], we say that X has Du Bois singularities if the
The weak ordinarity conjecture and F -singularities
9
∼=
canonical map OX → Ω0
R(π q )∗OX q where π q
: X q → X is a proper hypercover with smooth
terms. Alternately, suppose X ⊆ T is an embedding of X into a smooth
X is a quasi-isomorphism. Recall that Ω0
X
variety T , π : eT → T is a log resolution of (T, X) and E = (π−1X)red. In
∼= Rπ∗OE and it follows that X has Du Bois singularities
this case Ω0
X
if and only if OX → Rπ∗OE is a quasi-isomorphism, cf. [Esn90, Sch07].
We also need the following lemma on affine cones over varieties with
Du Bois singularities. It is well known to experts, but we do not know
a suitable reference. A related result which uses essentially the same
computation is found in [Ma13, Theorem 4.4].
Lemma 2.14. Suppose that X is a projective variety over a field of
characteristic zero such that X has Du Bois singularities. Let L be an
ample divisor. Then for all m ≫ 0, the affine cone
Y = Spec R(X, mL) = Spec M
j∈Z
H 0(X, OX (mjL))
has Du Bois singularities. In particular, every smooth projective variety
has an affine cone with Du Bois singularities for some embedding into
projective space.
Proof. Without loss of generality we may assume that L is very
ample and that R(X, L) is generated in degree one. We begin by con-
sidering what happens when m = 1. Let π : eY → Y be the blowup of
the cone point with exceptional divisor E ∼= X. Since eY is an A1-bundle
over X, we see that eY has Du Bois singularities (cf.
3.9]). We have an exact triangle:
[Doh08, Theorem
Ω0
Y → Rπ∗Ω0
eY ⊕ k → Rπ∗Ω0
E
which is just
Ω0
Y → Rπ∗OeY ⊕ k → Rπ∗OE
+1
−−→,
+1−−→ .
an isomorphism in degree zero. However, since π is an isomorphism away
[Ste83]. We consider the map α as a map of graded R(X, L)-modules.
Since we want to show that OY ∼= Ω0
Y , it is easy to see that it suffices
to show that α : Riπ∗OeY → Riπ∗OE is an isomorphism for all i > 0, cf.
Note that [Riπ∗OeY ]0 is simply H i(X, OX ) ∼= H i(E, OE) and that α is
from the origin, Riπ∗OeY is nonzero in only finitely many degrees. Since
the formation of Riπ∗OeY is easily seen to be compatible with taking
m ≫ 0 and conclude that Riπ∗OeY lives only in degree zero. Then α is
Veronese subrings of R(X, L), we can replace R(X, L) by R(X, mL) for
an isomorphism and this completes the proof.
Q.E.D.
10
B. Bhatt, K. Schwede, and S. Takagi
We conclude by stating a key theorem from [MS10] which is the
basis for our result on test ideals.
Theorem 2.15. ([MS10, Theorem 5.10]) Suppose that Conjecture
1.1 holds. Let π : X → T be a projective morphism of schemes over
k with X nonsingular, and let E be a reduced simple normal crossings
divisor on X.
If πA : XA → TA and EA are models over a finitely
generated Z-subalgebra A ⊆ k for π and E, respectively, then there exists
a Zariski-dense set of closed points S ⊂ Spec A such that for every e ≥ 1
and every s ∈ S, the induced morphism
πs∗F e
∗ ωXs(Es) → πs∗ωXs (Es)
is surjective.
§3. A result of Gabber on h-cohomology
The main content of this section was explained to us by O. Gabber,
[Gab12]; we bear full responsibility for any shortcomings or errors in our
exposition.
Notation 3.1. Fix a Noetherian excellent base scheme S that is an
Fp-scheme for a prime number p. Let Sch denote the category of S-
schemes of finite type. We use the following topologies on Sch: the
h-topology ([SV96, §10], [Bei12, §2]), the cdh-topology ([MVW06, §12],
[CHSW08, §3]), the Nisnevich topology ([MV99, §3.1],[MVW06, §12]),
and the fppf topology ([Sta14, Tag 021L]). Recall that the Nisnevich
topology is generated by ´etale covers with the residue field lifting prop-
erty, while the cdh-topology is generated by Nisnevich covers and covers
of the form X ′ ⊔ Z → X, where Z → X is a closed immersion, and
X ′ → X is an abstract blowup centered along Z, i.e., a proper map
that is an isomorphism outside Z. We write Shvh(Sch), Shvcdh(Sch),
ShvNis(Sch) and Shvf (Sch) for the corresponding topoi. There are ob-
vious morphisms
Shvh(Sch)
µ
'◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆
Shvcdh(Sch)
ν
w♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦
'❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖
ψ
π
Shvf (Sch)
η
w♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣
ShvNis(Sch)
w
'
'
w
The weak ordinarity conjecture and F -singularities
11
of topoi. The corresponding pushforward functors, at the level of sheaves
as well as at the derived level, are fully faithful (as these are different
topologies on the same category). Hence, we can (and will) view a cdh-
sheaf as a Nisnevich sheaf satisfying the sheaf property for cdh-covers,
and similarly for the other topologies. Passing to the derived level, we
say that an object K ∈ D(ShvNis(Sch)) satisfies cdh-descent if K ≃
Rψ∗ψ∗K via the natural map, i.e., that RΓNis(U, K) ≃ RΓcdh(U, ψ∗K)
for any U ∈ Sch or equivalently that K lies in the essential image of
the fully faithful functor D(Shvcdh(Sch)) → D(ShvNis(Sch)); we make
similar definitions for h-descent and flat descent. Given pro-object
{Xi} in Sch and a sheaf F ∈ ShvNis(Sch), we set RΓNis(limi Xi, F ) =
colim RΓNis(Xi, F ), and similarly for the other topologies; equivalently,
we define RΓNis(lim Xi, −) as the derived functor of F 7→ colim F (Xi).
The main case of interest is when {Xi} has affine transition maps (so
lim Xi exists as an affine scheme), and the functor F 7→ colim F (Xi)
defines a point of one of the above topoi (so the higher derived functors
vanish). For any ring R, we write Rperf = colim R, where the colimit
takes place over the Frobenius maps on R; this construction sheafifies
to give a presheaf Operf on Sch which is an fppf (and hence Nisnevich)
sheaf; we write O ∈ ShvNis(Sch) for the structure presheaf.
Remark 3.2. Our choice of the use of the cdh-topology is largely
dictated by the proof presented below: one has powerful finiteness the-
orems for proving descent (essentially due to Voevodsky [Voe00], but
we use [CHSW08, Theorem 3.4]), as well as an excellent description of
points (which relies, at least philosophically, on Zariski's initial work on
Riemann-Zariski spaces, see [GL01, §3]). The Nisnevich topology, on the
other hand, can be easily replaced by the Zariski topology in the dis-
cussion below without a serious cost: one must simply check Nisnevich
descent for the relevant sheaves whilst proving cdh-descent (which is
trivial: we only encounter locally quasi-coherent sheaves on Sch).
The main result we want to explain is:
Theorem 3.3 (Gabber). The sheaf Operf ∈ ShvNis(Sch) is the h-
sheafification of O. Moreover, Operf satisfies h-descent. In particular,
one has
RΓh(X, Operf) ≃ RΓcdh(X, Operf) ≃ RΓNis(X, Operf)
≃ colim RΓNis(X, O).
for any X ∈ Sch.
12
B. Bhatt, K. Schwede, and S. Takagi
Remark 3.4. The noetherian and excellence assumptions in Theo-
rem 3.3 are not really necessary: modulo correct definitions for non-
noetherian schemes, the h-cohomology of the structure sheaf always co-
incides with the cohomology of the perfection for arbitrary Fp-schemes.
More generally, one can also show a non-abelian analogue of this fact:
the category of vector bundles over Operf satisfies h-descent. Both these
results are explained in [BS15].
Lemma 3.5. The presheaf Operf
is topologically invariant, i.e.,
Operf (X) ≃ Operf (Y ) for any universal homeomorphism f : Y → X.
Proof. The map f is a finitely presented, and hence factors through
sufficiently high iterates of Frobenii on X and Y (see [Kol12, Proposition
35] or for instance [Yan85]), so the claim is clear.
Q.E.D.
Lemma 3.6. Let f : Y → X be a proper surjective map with geo-
metrically connected fibres. Then Operf(X) ≃ Operf(Y ).
Proof. The Stein factorisation Y a→ Y ′
b→ X satisfies: a∗OY =
OY ′, and b is finite surjective with geometrically connected fibres. Then
b is a universal homeomorphism, so Operf(X) ≃ Operf(Y ′) ≃ Operf(Y ).
Q.E.D.
Lemma 3.7. Let f : Y → X be a finite surjective morphism of
affine schemes, and let R ⊂ Y × Y be the reduced subscheme underlying
Y ×X Y . Then the quotient Y /R (in the sense of algebraic spaces)
exists, and is an affine scheme. Moreover, the natural map Y /R → X
is universal homeomorphism.
Proof. See [Kol12, Example 5].
Q.E.D.
Lemma 3.8. Let f : Y → X be a finite surjective morphism of
affine schemes that is an isomorphism over an open U ⊂ X. Let Z =
X − U , and Z ′ = f −1(Z) be the induced closed subschemes. Then the
following sequence is exact:
0 → Operf(X) → Operf (Y ) ⊕ Operf(Z) → Operf (Z ′) → 0.
Proof. This follows from the previous lemma or from the fact that
Q.E.D.
Operf (X) is weakly normal.
Lemma 3.9. Let f : Y → X be a proper surjective map. Assume
f is an isomorphism outside a closed subscheme Z ⊂ X, and let E =
f −1(Z) (with the induced scheme structure). Then the sequence
RΓNis(X, Operf) → RΓNis(Y, Operf)⊕RΓNis(Z, Operf) → RΓNis(E, Operf)
is a distinguished triangle.
The weak ordinarity conjecture and F -singularities
13
Proof. We may assume that X and hence Z is affine. It is then
enough to check:
Nis(Y, Operf ) ≃ H i
(1) H i
(2) The sequence
Nis(E, Operf ) for i > 0.
0 → Operf(X) → Operf(Y ) ⊕ Operf(Z) → Operf(E) → 0
is exact.
For (2), let Y → X ′ → X be the Stein factorisation, and let Z ′ ⊂ X ′ be
the inverse image of Z. Then the sequence in (2) is identified with
0 → Operf(X) → Operf (X ′) ⊕ Operf (Z) → Operf(Z ′) → 0
as the fibres of Y → X ′ are geometrically connected, so the exactness
comes from the previous lemma.
Now we tackle (1). Let I be the defining ideal of Z ⊆ X so that
I · OY also defines E. Note that by [Sta14, Lemma 29.20.4(1), Tag
02O7], there is a c such that if n ≥ c then
ker(cid:0)H i
Nis(Y, OY ) → H i
Nis(Y, OY /I n)(cid:1) ⊆ I n−cH i
Nis(Y, OY )
However, for n ≫ 0 and because i > 0, we know that I n−c annihilates
H i
Nis(Y, OY ) by hypothesis. Hence
(3.9.1)
H i
Nis(Y, OY ) ֒→ H i
Nis(Y, OY /I n)
injects. On the other hand, by [Sta14, Lemma 29.20.4(3), Tag 02O7]
Im(cid:0)H i
= Im(cid:0) H i
Nis(Y, OY /I m) → H i
Nis(Y, OY ) → H i
Nis(Y, OY /I n)(cid:1)
Nis(Y, OY /I n)(cid:1)
(3.9.2)
for m ≫ n ≫ 0.
Next choose n ≫ 0 and fix e ≫ 0. We consider the diagram below
where the horizontal maps are induced by the canonical maps and the
vertical maps are Frobenius (note the rows are not exact).
H i
Nis(Y, OY )
/ H i
Nis(Y, OY /I n)
/ H i
Nis(Y, OY /I)
F e
F e
F e
H i
Nis(Y, OY )
/ H i
Nis(Y, OY /I n)
β
/ H i
Nis(Y, OY /I)
We are about to take direct limits along Frobenius (vertically) and we
observe that
lim
−→
F
H i
Nis(Y, OY /I n) = lim
−→
F
H i
Nis(Y, OY /I).
/
/
/
/
14
B. Bhatt, K. Schwede, and S. Takagi
From the diagram, we see that the middle vertical map factors as
F e : H i
Nis(Y, OY /I n) → H i
Nis(Y, OY /I pen) → H i
Nis(Y, OY /I n)
where the second map is the canonical one and the first is induced by
Frobenius on Y . Hence the image of the middle vertical map is contained
in the image of β by (3.9.2). An application of (3.9.1) then implies
H i
Nis(Y, OY )
Nis(Y, Operf)
H i
= lim
−→
F
= lim
−→
F
= lim
−→
F
= H i
Nis(E, Operf).
H i
H i
Nis(Y, OY /I n)
Nis(E, OY /I)
This completes the proof.
Q.E.D.
Remark 3.10. The proof of (2) in the previous version of this paper
was incorrect. The problem was we misinterpreted [Gro61, Corollaire
3.3.2]. In particular, there it is written that if π : Y → X = Spec R
is proper, F a coherent sheaf on Y and I ⊆ R is an ideal, then for all
r ≥ k ≫ 0 we have that:
H i(Y, I k+rF ) = I r · H i(Y, I kF ).
The problem is that the multiplication on the right side is not the ordi-
nary action of R on H i(Y, I kF ). Rather I r · H i(Y, I kF ) is viewed as a
subset of H i(Y, I k+rF ). The composition
I r · H i(Y, I kF ) ⊆ H i(Y, I k+rF ) → H i(Y, I kF )
yields the ordinary action.
In our case, we incorrectly assumed that it was the ordinary action
in [Gro61, Corollaire 3.3.2]. Thus since we were taking F = OY and I so
that I r·H i(Y, I kF ) = 0 for r ≫ 0, we concluded that H i(Y, I k+rOY ) = 0
for i > 0. This is not true. Indeed suppose that Y is a resolution of
an isolated normal non-rational singularity (X, x) and that I = hf i is
a principal ideal vanishing at x. Then H i(Y, OY ) 6= 0 for some i > 0
hence I r · H i(Y, I kOY ) = H i(Y, f r+kOY ) ∼= H i(Y, OY ) 6= 0. We thank
Christopher Hacon and Linquan Ma for pointing out that our original
proof was incorrect.
The weak ordinarity conjecture and F -singularities
15
Lemma 3.11. Operf is an h-sheaf, i.e.,
Operf ∈ Shvh(Sch) ⊂ ShvNis(Sch).
Proof. We first observe that Operf is a cdh-sheaf by the lemmas
above. For the rest, fix X ∈ Sch. We will prove the sheaf axiom for
h-covers of X by induction on dim(X).
If dim(X) = 0, by passage
to reductions, we conclude using the fact that Operf is an fppf sheaf.
In general, any h-cover of X ∈ Sch can be refined by one of the form
a→ Y b→ X where a is a Zariski cover, and b is a proper surjective
⊔Ui
generically finite morphism. As we already know Zariski descent, it
suffices to show that
1 → Operf(X) b∗
→ Operf(Y )
1 −p∗
p∗
2→ Operf(Y ×X Y )
is exact. There is an abstract blowup X ′ → X centered along a closed
subset Z ⊂ X such that the strict transform Y ′ → X ′ of Y → X is flat
and surjective. This gives a diagram
Y ′ ⊔ (Y ×X Z)
/ (Y ×X X ′) ⊔ (Y ×X Z)
*❚❚❚❚❚❚❚❚❚❚❚❚❚❚❚❚
X ′ ⊔ Z
Y
/ X.
By induction, the commutativity of this diagram (and the flatness and
surjectivity of Y ′ → X ′) immediately show that b∗ : Operf(X) →
Operf(Y ) is injective. One also immediately deduces that a class in the
p∗
1 −p∗
2→ Operf(Y ×X Y ) defines one in the similar object
kernel of Operf (Y )
for the cover Y ′ ⊔ (Y ×X Z) → X ′ ⊔ Z, and, by induction, descends to
a class in Operf (X ′) ⊕ Operf(Z) as Operf is an h-sheaf. A diagram chase
shows that the resulting two classes on the inverse image of Z in X ′ agree,
so we conclude by cdh-descent for the cover X ′ ⊔ Z → X.
Q.E.D.
Lemma 3.12 (Cortinas, Haesemeyer, Schlichting, Weibel). Fix K ∈
D(ShvNis(Sch)). Assume that for an abstract blowup f : Y → X cen-
tered along some Z ⊂ X, the sequence
RΓNis(X, K) → RΓNis(Y, K) ⊕ RΓNis(Z, K) → RΓNis(f −1Z, K)
is a distinguished triangle. Then K satisfies cdh-descent.
Proof. See [CHSW08, Theorem 3.4].
Q.E.D.
Lemma 3.13. The cdh-sheafification of X 7→ H i
h(X, Operf ) is 0 for
i > 0.
*
/
/
/
/
16
B. Bhatt, K. Schwede, and S. Takagi
Proof. By work of Goodwillie and Lichtenbaum [GL01, Proposi-
tion 2.1 and Corollary 3.8], the rh-topology has enough points given by
spectra of valuation rings, viewed as suitable pro-objects in Sch. As
the cdh-topology is generated by the rh-topology as Nisnevich covers, it
follows that henselian valuation rings provide enough points for the cdh-
topology. In particular, it suffices to show that H i
h(−, Operf) vanishes
on spectra of valuation rings for i > 0. For a valuation ring R, there is
an ind-(finite flat) extension R → S where S is a valuation ring with an
algebraically closed fraction field. By flat descent for Operf-cohomology
(together with the observation that Spec(S) → Spec(R) is a cofiltered
limit of h-covers), it suffices to show that RΓh(Spec(S), Operf ) = Sperf ,
which is clear: S is a point object for the h-topology, i.e., any h-cover
Y → S has a section (see [GL01, Proposition 2.2]).
Q.E.D.
Proof of Theorem 3.3. We already know Operf is an h-sheaf. To
identify this h-sheaf as the h-sheafification of O, it suffices to observe
that the relative Frobenius morphism X → X (1) for any X ∈ Sch,
which is an h-cover, becomes an isomorphism after h-sheafification; this,
in turn, follows by identifying the reduced subscheme of X ×X (1) X
as the diagonal X ⊂ X ×X (1) X and the fact the passing to reduced
subschemes is an isomorphism after h-sheafification. Hence, Operf is the
h-sheafification of the structure presheaf O. The last lemma above shows
Rν∗Operf ≃ Operf, while cdh-descent shows Rψ∗Operf ≃ Operf. Q.E.D.
Corollary 3.14. Suppose X ∈ Sch is affine. Then
RΓ(X q , OX q ) ≃ O1/p∞
X
(X) = Operf(X).
lim
→
Here the limit runs over all proper hypercovers π q : X q → X.
Remark 3.15. When the base scheme S is the spectrum of a field,
by de Jong's alterations theorem, the colimit in Corollary 3.14 can be
taken over all proper hypercovers with each Xn smooth.
Proof. By Verdier's hypercovering theorem, the left hand side is
identified with RΓh(X, Operf ). By Theorem 3.3, this is identified with
RΓNis(X, Operf). If X is affine, then the higher Nisnevich (or even fppf)
cohomology of quasicoherent sheaves vanishes, so this complex identified
with Operf(X).
Q.E.D.
§4. Du Bois versus F -injective singularities
Our goal in this section is first to use the methods developed in
[MS10] to prove a relationship between F -injective and Du Bois singu-
larities.
The weak ordinarity conjecture and F -singularities
17
Conjecture 4.1. Let X be a reduced scheme of finite type over a
field of characteristic zero. Then X has Du Bois singularities if and
only if X is of dense F -injective type.
Indeed, we will show that:
Theorem 4.2. Conjecture 1.1 holds if and only if Conjecture 4.1
holds as well.
Before proving this, we must first show that Conjecture 1.1 actually
implies that Frobenius acts bijectively on all cohomology groups of the
structure sheaf. We then use this to generalize Theorem 2.15.
Lemma 4.3. Suppose that Conjecture 1.1 holds. Let V be an n-
dimensional smooth projective variety over a field k of characteristic
zero. Given a model of V over a finitely generated Z-subalgebra A of k,
there exists a Zariski-dense set of closed points S ⊆ Spec A such that the
action induced by Frobenius on H i(Vs, OVs) is bijective for every s ∈ S
and 0 ≤ i ≤ n.
Proof. We claim that there is a finite set of varieties, such that
if they simultaneously satisfy the condition of Conjecture 1.1 for some
S ⊆ Spec A, then the condition of the lemma holds for V . Note that
again it is harmless to assume that k is algebraically closed as in Remark
1.2. We prove this claim by strong induction on the dimension n. Let
D be a smooth ample divisor on V , chosen sufficiently positive so that
H i(V, OV (−D)) = 0 for all i ≤ n − 1. Then H i(V, OV ) → H i(D, OD) is
an isomorphism for all i ≤ n − 2 and an injection for i = n − 1. Since
dim D = n − 1, we can apply our induction hypothesis to D. It imme-
diately follows that Frobenius acts injectively (and hence bijectively) on
H i(Vs, OVs) for i ≤ n − 1 for appropriate S and all s ∈ S. Of course, we
may also certainly assume that Frobenius acts bijectively on H n(Vs, OVs )
for all s ∈ S by Remark 1.2. This completes the proof.
Q.E.D.
We now state our promised generalization of [MS10, Theorem 5.10],
ie of Theorem 2.15.
Theorem 4.4. With notation as in Theorem 2.15, we additionally
have that
Riπs∗F e
∗ ωXs(Es) → Riπs∗ωXs(Es)
is surjective for every i ≥ 0.
To prove this, we follow the method of [MS10], first proving several
lemmas.
18
B. Bhatt, K. Schwede, and S. Takagi
Lemma 4.5. ([MS10, Lemma 5.6]) Suppose that E = Si∈I Ei is a
projective simple normal crossings variety over a field k of characteristic
zero, and that we are given a model of E over a finitely generated Z-
subalgebra A of k. Assuming Conjecture 1.1, there exists a Zariski-
dense set of closed points S ⊂ Spec A such that the Frobenius action
F : H j(Es, OEs) → H j(Es, OEs) is bijective for every s ∈ S and j ≥ 0.
Proof. This is essentially taken from [MS10, Lemma 5.6]. Without
loss of generality, we may assume that for all closed points s ∈ Spec A,
Es is still simple normal crossings, in particular each (Ei)s is smooth
and even more every intersection (EI ′ )s := Ti∈I ′ (Ei)s is also smooth
over k(s) for all I ′ ⊆ I. We apply Conjecture 1.1 (and Lemma 4.3) to
each component of these intersections and so assume that the Frobenius
action is bijective on each of their cohomology groups for some Zariski-
dense set S ⊂ Spec A. Fix an arbitrary s ∈ S. We denote by n − 1 the
dimension of E and form an acyclic complex
C q : 0 → C0 d0
−→ C1 d1
−→ . . . dn−1
−−−→ Cn dn
−→ 0.
where Cr = LI ′=r O(EI ′ )s and C0 = OEs. Note that if I ′ = r, then
EI ′ = T Ei has dimension n − r since intersecting r components of E
results in a scheme of dimension n − r. We put Zi = ker di and observe
that we have exact sequences compatible with Frobenius for each r ≥ 1
and j ≥ 1:
H j−1(Xs, Cr) → H j−1(Xs, Z r+1) → H j(Xs, Z r)
→H j(Xs, Cr) → H j(Xs, Z r+1).
Note that Frobenius is bijective on the H j(Xs, Cr) terms for any r ≥ 1
and j ≥ 0. We then perform a descending induction on r. When r = n,
it is obvious that Frobenius acts bijectively on H j(Xs, Z r) for all j ≥ 0,
hence the base case is taken care of. Thus the Frobenius acts bijectively
on H j(Xs, Z r) for any r ≥ 1 and j ≥ 0 (say by the 5-lemma or [MS10,
Lemma 2.4]). Since Z 1 = Im d0 ∼= OEs, we complete the proof. Q.E.D.
Continuing to follow [MS10] we have the following.
Lemma 4.6. ([MS10, Corollary 5.7]) With notation as in Lemma
4.5, suppose that E ⊂ X is a reduced simple normal crossings divisor in
a smooth projective variety X. Assuming Conjecture 1.1, there exists a
Zariski-dense set of closed points S ⊂ Spec A such that
F : H i(Xs, OXs (−Es)) → H i(Xs, OXs (−Es))
is bijective for every s ∈ S and i ≥ 0.
The weak ordinarity conjecture and F -singularities
19
Proof. This immediately follows from an application of the five
lemma (or [MS10, Lemma 2.4]) to the cohomology sequence of the short
exact sequence 0 → OXs (−Es) → OXs → OEs → 0 and the fact that
the Frobenius actions on H i(Xs, OXs ) and H i(Es, OEs) are bijective.
Q.E.D.
We now come to the proof of Theorem 4.4.
Proof of Theorem 4.4. The proof is essentially the same as that of
[MS10, Theorem 5.10]. Note that as observed in Remark 1.2 we may
assume that k is algebraically closed. By the same argument as that of
[MS10, Theorem 5.10], we can reduce to the case where X and T are
projective. We choose a sufficiently ample L on T such that each of the
direct image sheaves (Riπ∗ωX(E)) ⊗ L is globally generated, and such
that the higher cohomology H j(T, (Riπ∗ωX (E)) ⊗ L ) = 0 for all j ≥ 1.
By Bertini's theorem, we then choose a general section D′ ∈ L so that
E + π∗D′ is a reduced simple normal crossing divisor. Put E′ = π∗D′
and observe that we have surjections
H i(Xs, F∗ωXs(Es + E′
s)) → H i(Xs, ωXs(Es + E′
s))
by Serre duality and Lemma 4.6 (applied to E + E′) for an appropriate
Zariski-dense set of closed points S ⊆ Spec A and all s ∈ S. Of course,
these maps factor through surjections:
H i(Xs, F∗ωXs(Es + pE′
s))
/ H i(Xs, ωXs(Es + E′
s))
∼
∼
H i(Xs, (F∗ωXs(Es)) ⊗ π∗
s
Ls)
/ H i(Xs, ωXs(Es) ⊗ π∗
s
Ls).
Since we may assume that H j(Ts, (Riπs∗ωXs(Es)) ⊗ Ls) = 0 for ev-
ery closed point s ∈ Spec A and j ≥ 1, by a simple spectral sequence
argument, the following maps surject for all s ∈ S:
H 0(Ts, (F∗Riπs∗ωXs(Es)) ⊗ Ls) → H 0(Ts, (Riπs∗ωXs (Es)) ⊗ Ls).
By the global generation we claimed in characteristic zero, which is
preserved on an open dense set of points in Spec A, the proof is complete.
Q.E.D.
We can now prove our theorem relating F -injective and Du Bois
singularities after reduction to characteristic p > 0.
/
/
/
/
/
/
20
B. Bhatt, K. Schwede, and S. Takagi
Proof of Theorem 4.2. We first show that assuming Conjecture 1.1,
if Y has Du Bois singularities, then Y has dense F -injective type. Indeed,
suppose that Y is a reduced scheme over k in characteristic zero with
Du Bois singularities. Working locally if necessary, embed Y inside a
smooth variety T and let π : X → T be a projective log resolution
of (T, Y ) with E = (π−1Y )red. We spread this data out to a model
over a finitely generated Z-subalgebra A of k. We may restrict our
attention to s ∈ Spec A such that Riπs∗ωXs = 0 for all i > 0 by Grauert–
Riemenschneider vanishing [GR70]. Note that then Riπs∗F e
∗ ωXs(Es) →
Riπs∗F e
∗ ωEs surjects for all i ≥ 0. By Theorem 4.4, there exists a
Zariski-dense set of closed points S ⊆ Spec A such that
(4.6.1)
Riπs∗F e
∗ ωEs → Riπs∗ωEs
surjects for all i ≥ 0 and s ∈ S. However, since Y is Du Bois, we have
Riπs∗ωEs
. This combined with the surjection of (4.6.1)
implies that Ys is F -injective by local duality.
∼= hi−dim Eω q
Ys
Now we assume that every variety with Du Bois singularities has
dense F -injective type and we prove Conjecture 1.1. Let X be a smooth
projective variety over a field of characteristic zero. Fix an ample divisor
B on X and consider the affine cone Y = Spec R(X, mB) for m ≫ 0.
We may restrict our attention to s ∈ Spec A such that R(X, mB)s =
R(Xs, mBs). Note that Y is Du Bois by Lemma 2.14.
It follows by
assumption that Ys is F -injective for all s in some dense set of maximal
ideals S ⊆ Spec A. In particular, the Frobenius map
(4.6.2)
F : H n+1
ys
(OYs ) → H n+1
ys
(OYs )
injects where y is the cone point. Since R(X, mB)s = R(Xs, mBs)
is graded, (4.6.2) injects in degree zero. However, this is nothing but
requiring that F : H n(Xs, OXs) → H n(Xs, OXs) injects, and hence
bijects, which is what we wanted to prove.
Q.E.D.
Remark 4.7. It is worth pointing out that a weaker version of Con-
jecture 4.1, only for isolated standard graded singularities, is all that is
needed for the (⇐) direction of Theorem 4.2. This follows from the proof
above since the only singularities we consider are cones over smooth va-
rieties.
We now come to our other main result on Du Bois and F -injective
singularities. We utilize the work of Gabber from Section 3.
Theorem 4.8. Suppose that X is a reduced scheme of finite type
over a field k. Then for any proper hypercover with smooth terms π q :
The weak ordinarity conjecture and F -singularities
21
X q → X, consider the canonical map
(4.8.1)
H i
z(OX,z) → Hi
z((R(π q )∗OX q )z)
for each i and each point z ∈ X.
•
•
Suppose k is of characteristic zero, then X has Du Bois singu-
larities if and only if (4.8.1) injects for each π q , i and z.
Suppose k is of characteristic p > 0 and is F -finite, then X has
F -injective singularities if and only if (4.8.1) injects for each
π q , i and z.
Proof. There is nothing to prove in characteristic zero by [Kov99].
In characteristic p > 0, suppose first that X has F -injective singularities.
It follows easily that for every point z ∈ X and every i ≥ 0 that
z(O1/p∞
X,z )
X,z ) ∼= H i
z(O1/pe
H i
H i
z(OX,z) ֒→ lim
e(cid:1)∞
X,z (cid:1) = H i
O1/pe
z(cid:0) lim
e(cid:1)∞
injects. Now, choose π q
: X q → X a proper hypercover with smooth
terms of X. Then for any i ≥ 0 and point z ∈ X, we obtain a factoriza-
tion of the above map
H i
z(OX,z) → Hi
z((R(π q )∗OX q )z) → H i
z(O1/p∞
X,z )
by Theorem 3.14. Hence (4.8.1) injects as claimed.
The converse is even easier, note that if π q : X q → X is a proper hy-
π q−−→ X F−→ X is also a proper
z(OX,z) → Hi
z((R(µ q )∗OX q )z)
z(F∗OX,z) which proves that X is F -
Q.E.D.
percover with smooth terms, then µ q : X q
hypercover with smooth terms. Hence if H i
injects, so does H i
injective.
z(OX,z) → H i
§5. Comparison between multiplier ideals and test ideals
Before proving Theorem A from the introduction, we prove a lemma
which is essentially the heart of the proof. First we make a small defi-
nition.
Definition 5.1. Suppose that (M, φ : F e
∗ (M ⊗ L ) → M ) is a
Cartier module on a scheme X. Further suppose that D is an effective
Cartier divisor on X. Since D is effective, we have an induced map
φD : F e
∗ (M ⊗ L ⊗ OX (−(pe − 1)D)) ⊆ F e
∗ (M ⊗ L )
Setting N = L ⊗ OX (−(pe − 1)D) we see that (M, φD : F e
∗ (M ⊗ N ) →
M ) is also a Cartier module. Then we use σ(M, φ, D) = σ(M, φD) to de-
note the maximal F -pure Cartier submodule of (M, φD) as in Definition
2.7.
φ
−→ M.
22
B. Bhatt, K. Schwede, and S. Takagi
Lemma 5.2. Suppose that X = Spec R is a normal affine variety
over a field k of characteristic zero, f ∈ R is a nonzero element with
D = div(f ) and a1 ≥ 1 is an integer. Suppose also that we are given
a model of (X, f ) over a finitely generated Z-subalgebra A of k. Let a0
be the largest jumping number of J (ωX , f t) which is less than a1. Then
there exist finitely many smooth projective varieties X (i) over k and a
nonempty open subset U ⊆ Spec A satisfying the following. If s ∈ U is
a closed point and the Frobenius maps
(5.2.1)
F : H dim X (i)
s (X (i)
s , OX (i)
s
) → H dim X (i)
s (X (i)
s , OX (i)
s
)
are bijective for all i, then J (ωX , f a)s = τ (ωXs , f a
s ) for all a0 ≤ a < a1.
Proof. Throughout this proof, we let p(s) denote the characteristic
of the residue field k(s) of a closed point s ∈ Spec A. We fix a log
resolution π : Y → X of (X, f ) and let F = (divY (f ))red = (π∗D)red. It
follows from the proof of [MS10, Theorem 5.10] that there exist finitely
many smooth projective varieties X (i) over k and a nonempty open
subset U ⊆ Spec A such that the bijections of (5.2.1) above guarantee
that the log trace maps
F e
∗ πs∗OYs (KYs + Fs) → πs∗OYs (KYs + Fs)
surject for each e > 0. By the projection formula, we obtain the surjec-
tivity of the following maps
∗ πs∗OYs(KYs + Fs − p(s)ea1π∗Ds) → πs∗OYs (KYs + Fs − a1π∗Ds),
F e
which we identify with
(5.2.2)
Tre
a1Ds : F e
∗ πs∗OYs(KYs + Fs − a1π∗Ds)
∗ f a1(p(s)e −1)
Tre(F e
−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−→ πs∗OYs(KYs + Fs − a1π∗Ds).
)
·
s
Note that the map of (5.2.2) is the restriction of
Tre
a1Ds : F e
∗ ωXs
∗ f a1(p(s)e −1)
Tre(F e
−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−→ ωXs
)
·
s
which can also be identified with Tre : F e
ωXs ) → ωXs .
Shrinking U if necessary and applying Proposition 2.11, we can assume
that the following holds for all closed points s ∈ U :
∗ (f a1(p(s)e−1)
s
(a) πs : Ys → Xs is a log resolution of (Xs, fs).
(b) J (ωX , f a)s = J (ωXs, f a
s ) = πs∗OYs(⌈KYs − aπ∗
s Ds⌉) for all
a ∈ R≥0.
The weak ordinarity conjecture and F -singularities
23
(c) J (ωX )s = τ (ωXs ).
By (b), we obtain that for sufficiently small ǫ > 0,
(5.2.3)
πs∗OYs(KYs + Fs − a1π∗Ds) = J (ωXs , f a1−ǫ
s
) = J (ωX , f a1−ǫ)s
= J (ωX , f a0)s.
We now fix an arbitrary closed point s ∈ U . For all a0 ≤ a < a1, we
have
(5.2.4)
τ (ωXs , f a
s ) ⊆ (cid:0)πs∗OYs(⌈KYs − aπ∗
s Ds⌉)(cid:1) = J (ωX , f a)s,
where the first containment follows from the universal property defin-
s ).2 This is the "easy" containment, see for example the
ing τ (ωXs , f a
argument of [Smi97] or [MS10, Proposition 4.2]. On the other hand,
(τ (ωXs ), Tr : F e
∗ ωXs → ωXs) is a Cartier module which implies that
∗ (f (p(s)e−1)a1
τ (ωXs ))) ⊆ Tre(F e
∗ τ (ωXs )) ⊆ τ (ωXs ).
Tre(F e
s
Hence we obtain a Cartier-module structure on τ (ωXs ) by restricting
same map Tr1
a1Ds we studied immediately after (5.2.2). It follows then
that for any a0 ≤ a < a1
(5.2.5)
τ (ωXs , f a
s ) = Pe≫0 Tre(cid:0)F e
⊇ Pe≫0 Tre(cid:0)F e
= σ(τ (ωXs ), Tra1Ds ),
s
∗ (f ⌈p(s)ea⌉
∗ (f (p(s)e−1)a1
s
τ (ωXs ))(cid:1)
τ (ωXs ))(cid:1)
where the first equality follows from [BSTZ10, Lemma 3.21].
Now (5.2.2) and (5.2.3) imply that J (ωX , f a0)s = J (ωX , f a)s is
an F -pure Cartier module under the action of Tra1Ds . It is certainly
contained in τ (ωXs ) by (c). Hence, since σ(τ (ωXs ), Tra1Ds) is the largest
F -pure Cartier module contained in τ (ωXs ), we have
(5.2.6)
J (ωX , f a)s ⊆ σ(τ (ωXs ), Tra1Ds).
Combining (5.2.6), (5.2.5) and (5.2.4), we obtain for any a0 ≤ a < a1
that
J (ωX , f a)s ⊆ σ(τ (ωXs ), Tra1Ds ) ⊆ τ (ωXs , f a
s ) ⊆ J (ωX , f a)s
which completes the proof of the lemma.
Q.E.D.
Now we come to the theorem from the introduction.
2τ (ωXs , f a
∗ f ⌈a(pe−1)⌉
Tre(F e
) for all e > 0.
s ) is the smallest nonzero submodule of ωX stable under
24
B. Bhatt, K. Schwede, and S. Takagi
Theorem 5.3. Conjecture 1.3 holds if and only if Conjecture 1.1
holds.
Proof.
It is proved by [Mus10] that if Conjecture 1.3 holds, then
Conjecture 1.1 holds as well, so we consider the converse. We recall
the setup of Conjecture 1.3. Let X be a normal variety over a field k
of characteristic zero. Suppose that ∆ is a Q-divisor on X such that
KX + ∆ is Q-Cartier, and a is a nonzero ideal on X. Suppose also that
we are given a model of (X, ∆, a) over a finitely generated Z-subalgebra
A of k. Under these hypotheses, we need to show that there exists a
Zariski-dense set of closed points S ⊆ Spec A such that
(5.3.1)
τ (Xs, ∆s, a
λ
s ) = J (X, ∆, a
λ)s for all λ ∈ R≥0 and all s ∈ S.
Since proving Conjecture 1.3 for (X, ∆, a) is equivalent to proving
it simultaneously for all (Ui, ∆Ui, aUi ), where X = Si Ui is a finite
affine open cover of X, it is enough to consider the case when X is
affine. Likewise as in Remark 1.2 we may assume that k is algebraically
closed since the formation of the multiplier ideal commutes with field
base change. Arguing exactly as in [MS10, Proposition 4.3], one may
also assume that a = hf i is a principal ideal.
Now, let α : W → X be a finite cover from a normal W such that
α∗(KX + ∆) is an integral Cartier divisor. After possibly enlarging A,
we may assume that αs : Ws → Xs is a finite separable cover with Ws
normal and α∗
s(KXs + ∆s) is Cartier for all closed points s ∈ Spec A.
Note that by Lemmas 2.3 (iii) and 2.9 (iii),
J (X, ∆, f λ) =J (ωX , KX + ∆, f λ)
τ (Xs, ∆s, f λ
= TrW/X (cid:0)α∗J (ωW , α∗(KX + ∆), f λ)(cid:1),
s ) =τ (ωXs , KXs + ∆s, f λ
s )
= TrWs/Xs (cid:0)αs∗τ (ωWs , α∗
s )(cid:1).
s(KXs + ∆s), f λ
Since α∗(KX + ∆) (resp. α∗
s(KXs + ∆s)) is Cartier, by Lemma 2.3 (ii)
(resp. 2.9 (ii)), we can pull it out from the multiplier (resp. test) module.
In particular, instead of showing (5.3.1), it suffices to prove that there
exists a Zariski-dense set of closed points S ⊆ Spec A such that
(5.3.2)
τ (ωXs , f λ
s ) = J (ωX , f λ)s for all λ ∈ R≥0 and all s ∈ S.
s ) and J (ωX , f λ) are periodic in λ with period 1, it
Since both τ (ωXs , f λ
is enough to show (5.3.2) for all λ ∈ [0, 1].
Next, we let 0 = λ0 < λ1 < . . . < λn = 1 denote the distinct
jumping numbers of J (ωX , f λ) in [0, 1]. Note that the λj are rational
numbers.
The weak ordinarity conjecture and F -singularities
25
Claim 5.4. There exist a nonempty open subset U ⊆ Spec A and
finitely many smooth projective varieties X (i)
over k for each λj satis-
fying the following. If s ∈ U is a closed point and the action of Frobe-
nius on H dim X (i)
s ) =
J (ωX , f λ)s for all λj−1 ≤ λ < λj .
) is bijective for all i, then τ (ωXs , f λ
j,s, OX (i)
j
j,s (X (i)
j,s
Proof of Claim 5.4. Write λj = a1/m with a1, m positive integers.
Let β : Z → X be a finite cover from a normal Z such that f 1/m =:
g ∈ OZ (for example, extract an mth root of f and normalize). Since λj
is a jumping number of J (ωX , f λ), by Lemma 2.3 (iii), a1 is a jumping
number of J (ωZ , gt). Let a0 denote the jumping number of J (ωZ , gt)
immediately before a1. Note that λj > a0/m ≥ λj−1.
By choosing a small U , we can assume that the following holds for
all closed points s ∈ U :
(a) βs : Zs → Xs is a finite separable cover with Zs normal.
(b) τ (ωXs , f λ
(c) τ (ωZs , ga0
s ) ⊆ J (ωX , f λ)s for all λj−1 ≤ λ < λj.
s ) = J (ωZ, ga0)s.
Applying Lemmas 2.3 (iii) and 2.9 (iii) to (c), we have J (ωX , f a0/m)s =
τ (ωXs , f a0/m
). Since J (ωX , f λj−1 ) = J (ωX , f λ) for all λj−1 ≤ λ ≤
a0/m, we see immediately from (b) that J (ωX , f λ)s = τ (ωXs , f λ
s ) for
λj−1 ≤ λ ≤ a0/m.
s
By Lemma 5.2, possibly shrinking U , we can prove that τ (ωZs , gt
s) =
J (ωZ , gt)s for all a0 ≤ t < a1. Applying Lemmas 2.3 (iii) and 2.9 (iii)
again, we have J (ωX , f λ)s = τ (ωXs , f λ
s ) for a0/m ≤ λ ≤ a1/m = λj .
The proof of the claim is completed.
Q.E.D.
Now we return to the proof of the theorem. For each jumping number
λj, assuming Conjecture 1.1 recalling Remark 1.2, we can prove the
result for λ ∈ [λj−1, λj] by finding the finitely many X (i)
guaranteed by
j
the claim. Since there are only finitely many jumping numbers in [0, 1],
the theorem follows.
Q.E.D.
Remark 5.5. The referee asked the natural question of whether as-
suming Conjecture 1.1 for V of dimension ≤ n − 1 is enough to imply
Conjecture 1.3 for X of dimension ≤ n (this might be expected since one
would expect the F -singularities of Xs to be governed by the ordinarity
of the exceptional divisors of a resolution). This does not seem to work
at least with our proof. The problem is that at the start of the proof of
Lemma 5.2 we argue as in [MS10, Theorem 5.10] where one needs to as-
sume Conjecture 1.1 also in dimension n (because of an appeal to [MS10,
Corollary 5.7]). Perhaps there are ways around this issue however.
26
B. Bhatt, K. Schwede, and S. Takagi
We conclude with a natural question that was pointed out by the
referee and others.
Question 5.6. Does Conjecture 1.1 imply that a variant of the non-
LC ideal [Amb03, Fuj10, FST11] reduce to σ(Xs, ∆s) for all s in a
Zariski-dense set of closed points S ⊆ Spec A (with notation as above)?
We hope to consider this question at a later time.
References
[Amb03]
F. Ambro: Quasi-log varieties, Tr. Mat. Inst. Steklova 240 (2003),
no. Biratsion. Geom. Linein. Sist. Konechno Porozhdennye Alge-
bry, 220–239. MR1993751 (2004f:14027)
[Bei12]
A. Beilinson: p-adic periods and derived de Rham cohomology, J.
Amer. Math. Soc. 25 (2012), no. 3, 715–738. 2904571
[BS15]
B. Bhatt and P. Scholze: The Witt vector affine Grassmannian,
preprint, 2015
[BB11]
M. Blickle and G. Bockle: Cartier modules: finiteness results,
J. Reine Angew. Math. 661 (2011), 85–123. 2863904
[BSTZ10] M. Blickle, K. Schwede, S. Takagi, and W. Zhang: Discrete-
ness and rationality of F -jumping numbers on singular varieties,
Math. Ann. 347 (2010), no. 4, 917–949. 2658149
[BK86]
S. Bloch and K. Kato: p-adic ´etale cohomology, Inst. Hautes
´Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. (1986), no. 63, 107–152. 849653 (87k:14018)
[CHSW08] G. Cortinas, C. Haesemeyer, M. Schlichting, and
C. Weibel: Cyclic homology, cdh-cohomology and negative K-
theory, Ann. of Math. (2) 167 (2008), no. 2, 549–573. 2415380
(2009c:19006)
[Del74]
P. Deligne: Th´eorie de Hodge. III, Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. Publ.
[Doh08]
[Du 81]
Math. (1974), no. 44, 5–77. MR0498552 (58 #16653b)
D. C. Doherty: Singularities of generic projection hypersurfaces,
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 136 (2008), no. 7, 2407–2415. 2390507
(2008k:14076)
P. Du Bois: Complexe de de Rham filtr´e d'une vari´et´e singuli`ere,
Bull. Soc. Math. France 109 (1981), no. 1, 41–81. MR613848
(82j:14006)
[Esn90]
H. Esnault: Hodge type of subvarieties of Pn of small degrees,
Math. Ann. 288 (1990), no. 3, 549–551. 1079878 (91m:14075)
[Fed83]
R. Fedder: F -purity and rational singularity, Trans. Amer. Math.
Soc. 278 (1983), no. 2, 461–480. MR701505 (84h:13031)
[Fuj10]
O. Fujino: Theory of non-lc ideal sheaves: basic properties, Kyoto
J. Math. 50 (2010), no. 2, 225–245. 2666656 (2011f:14031)
[FST11] O. Fujino, K. Schwede, and S. Takagi: Supplements to non-
lc ideal sheaves, Higher Dimensional Algebraic Geometry, RIMS
The weak ordinarity conjecture and F -singularities
27
Kokyuroku Bessatsu, B24, Res. Inst. Math. Sci. (RIMS), Kyoto,
2011, pp. 1–47.
O. Gabber: Notes on some t-structures, Geometric aspects of
Dwork theory. Vol. I, II, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG,
Berlin, 2004, pp. 711–734.
O. Gabber: Private communication, 2012.
T. G. Goodwillie and S. Lichtenbaum: A cohomological bound
for the h-topology, Amer. J. Math. 123 (2001), no. 3, 425–443.
1833147 (2002h:14029)
H. Grauert and O. Riemenschneider: Verschwindungssatze fur
analytische Kohomologiegruppen auf komplexen Raumen, Invent.
Math. 11 (1970), 263–292. MR0302938 (46 #2081)
A. Grothendieck: ´El´ements de g´eom´etrie alg´ebrique. III. ´Etude
cohomologique des faisceaux coh´erents. I, Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci.
Publ. Math. (1961), no. 11, 167. MR0163910 (29 #1209)
N. Hara and K.-I. Yoshida: A generalization of tight closure
and multiplier ideals, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 355 (2003), no. 8,
3143–3174 (electronic). MR1974679 (2004i:13003)
R. Hartshorne and R. Speiser: Local cohomological dimension
in characteristic p, Ann. of Math. (2) 105 (1977), no. 1, 45–79.
MR0441962 (56 #353)
[Gab04]
[Gab12]
[GL01]
[GR70]
[Gro61]
[HY03]
[HS77]
[HH06]
M. Hochster and C. Huneke: Tight closure in equal character-
istic zero, A preprint of a manuscript, 2006.
[HJ13]
A. Huber and C. Jorder: Differential forms in the h-topology,
Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.7361.
[JR03]
K. Joshi and C. S. Rajan: Frobenius splitting and ordinarity, Int.
[Kol12]
[Kov99]
[Kov12]
[KS11a]
[KS11b]
Math. Res. Not. (2003), no. 2, 109–121. 1936581 (2003i:14023)
J. Koll´ar: Quotients by finite equivalence relations, Current devel-
opments in algebraic geometry, Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ., vol. 59,
Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2012, pp. 227–256, With an
appendix by Claudiu Raicu. 2931872
S. J. Kov´acs: Rational, log canonical, Du Bois singularities: on
the conjectures of Koll´ar and Steenbrink, Compositio Math. 118
(1999), no. 2, 123–133. MR1713307 (2001g:14022)
S. J. Kov´acs: The intuitive definition of Du Bois singularities,
Geometry and arithmetic, EMS Ser. Congr. Rep., Eur. Math. Soc.,
Zurich, 2012, pp. 257–266. 2987664
S. J. Kov´acs and K. Schwede: Du Bois singularities deform,
arXiv:1107.2349, to appear in Advanced Studies in Pure Mathe-
matics.
S. J. Kov´acs and K. Schwede: Hodge theory meets the minimal
model program: a survey of log canonical and Du Bois singular-
ities, Topology of Stratified Spaces (G. Friedman, E. Hunsicker,
A. Libgober, and L. Maxim, eds.), Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ.,
vol. 58, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2011, pp. 51–94.
28
[Laz04]
B. Bhatt, K. Schwede, and S. Takagi
R. Lazarsfeld: Positivity in algebraic geometry. II, Ergebnisse der
Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Mod-
ern Surveys in Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and Related
Areas. 3rd Series. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics],
vol. 49, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004, Positivity for vector bun-
dles, and multiplier ideals. MR2095472 (2005k:14001b)
[Lee07]
B. Lee: Local acyclic fibrations and the de rham complex, Available
at http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.3147.
L. Ma: F -injectivity and Buchsbaum singularities, preprint, 2013.
[Ma13]
[MVW06] C. Mazza, V. Voevodsky, and C. Weibel: Lecture notes on mo-
tivic cohomology, Clay Mathematics Monographs, vol. 2, American
Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2006. 2242284 (2007e:14035)
[MV99]
F. Morel and V. Voevodsky: A1-homotopy theory of schemes,
Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. (1999), no. 90, 45–143
(2001). 1813224 (2002f:14029)
[Mus10] M. Mustat¸a: Ordinary varieties and the comparison between mul-
tiplier ideals and test ideals ii, arXiv:1012.2915.
[MS10]
[Sch07]
M. Mustat¸a and V. Srinivas: Ordinary varieties and the com-
parison between multiplier ideals and test ideals, arXiv:1012.2818.
K. Schwede: A simple characterization of Du Bois singularities,
Compos. Math. 143 (2007), no. 4, 813–828. MR2339829
[Sch09]
K. Schwede: F -injective singularities are Du Bois, Amer. J. Math.
131 (2009), no. 2, 445–473. MR2503989
[ST08]
K. Schwede and S. Takagi: Rational singularities associated to
[ST10]
[ST12]
pairs, Michigan Math. J. 57 (2008), 625–658.
K. Schwede and K. Tucker: On the behavior of test ideals un-
der finite morphisms, arXiv:1003.4333, to appear in J. Algebraic
Geom.
K. Schwede and K. Tucker: A survey of test ideals, Progress in
Commutative Algebra 2. Closures, Finiteness and Factorization
(C. Francisco, L. C. Klinger, S. M. Sather-Wagstaff, and J. C.
Vassilev, eds.), Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin, 2012,
pp. 39–99.
[Smi97]
K. E. Smith: F -rational rings have rational singularities, Amer. J.
Math. 119 (1997), no. 1, 159–180. MR1428062 (97k:13004)
[Sta14]
T. Stacks Project Authors:
Stacks Project, available at
[Ste81]
[Ste83]
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu, 2014.
J. H. M. Steenbrink: MR0613848 (82j:14006), Review of "Com-
plexe de de Rham filtr´e d'une vari´et´e singuli`ere" for the AMS
mathematical reviews database, 1981.
J. H. M. Steenbrink: Mixed Hodge structures associated with
isolated singularities, Singularities, Part 2 (Arcata, Calif., 1981),
Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 40, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence,
RI, 1983, pp. 513–536. MR713277 (85d:32044)
The weak ordinarity conjecture and F -singularities
29
A. Suslin and V. Voevodsky: Singular homology of abstract al-
gebraic varieties, Invent. Math. 123 (1996), no. 1, 61–94. 1376246
(97e:14030)
V. Voevodsky:
completely
S. Takagi: An interpretation of multiplier ideals via tight closure, J.
Algebraic Geom. 13 (2004), no. 2, 393–415. MR2047704 (2005c:13002)
sheaves
in
at
http://www.math.uiuc.edu/K-theory/443/cdstructures.pdf.
H. Yanagihara: On an intrinsic definition of weakly normal rings,
decomposable
topologies,
Available
Homotopy
theory
of
simplicial
[SV96]
[Tak04]
[Voe00]
[Yan85]
Kobe J. Math. 2 (1985), no. 1, 89–98. MR811809 (87d:13007)
Department of Mathematics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109,
USA
Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, 155 South 1400 East, Salt Lake
City, UT 84112, USA
Graduate School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Tokyo 3-8-1 Komaba
Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8914, Japan
E-mail address: [email protected]
E-mail address: [email protected]
E-mail address: [email protected]
|
1312.0898 | 2 | 1312 | 2016-05-24T19:09:05 | Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces | [
"math.AG",
"math.NT",
"math.RT"
] | We study moduli spaces of lattice-polarized K3 surfaces in terms of orbits of representations of algebraic groups. In particular, over an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0, we show that in many cases, the nondegenerate orbits of a representation are in bijection with K3 surfaces (up to suitable equivalence) whose N\'eron-Severi lattice contains a given lattice. An immediate consequence is that the corresponding moduli spaces of these lattice-polarized K3 surfaces are all unirational. Our constructions also produce many fixed-point-free automorphisms of positive entropy on K3 surfaces in various families associated to these representations, giving a natural extension of recent work of Oguiso. | math.AG | math |
1
ORBIT PARAMETRIZATIONS FOR K3 SURFACES
MANJUL BHARGAVA1, WEI HO2 and ABHINAV KUMAR3
1Department of Mathematics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544;
2Department of Mathematics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109;
[email protected]
[email protected]
3Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA
02139; Current address: Department of Mathematics, Stony Brook University, Stony
Brook, NY 11794; [email protected]
Abstract
We study moduli spaces of lattice-polarized K3 surfaces in terms of orbits of representations
of algebraic groups. In particular, over an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0, we show
that in many cases, the nondegenerate orbits of a representation are in bijection with K3 surfaces
(up to suitable equivalence) whose N´eron-Severi lattice contains a given lattice. An immediate
consequence is that the corresponding moduli spaces of these lattice-polarized K3 surfaces are
all unirational. Our constructions also produce many fixed-point-free automorphisms of positive
entropy on K3 surfaces in various families associated to these representations, giving a natural
extension of recent work of Oguiso.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 14J28, 14J10, 14J50, 11Exx
Contents
1
Introduction
2 Preliminaries
3 Some classical moduli spaces for K3 surfaces with low Picard num-
ber
2
11
15
c(cid:13) The Author(s) 2016. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence
(<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/>), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
4 Rubik's revenge: 4 ⊗ 4 ⊗ 4
5 Doubly symmetric Rubik's revenge: 4 ⊗ Sym2(4)
6 Triply symmetric Rubik's revenge: Sym3(4)
7 Penteracts (or 5-cubes): 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 2
8 Doubly symmetric penteracts: 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ Sym2(2)
9 Triply symmetric penteracts: 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ Sym3(2)
10 Doubly-doubly symmetric penteracts: 2 ⊗ Sym2(2) ⊗ Sym2(2)
11 Doubly-triply symmetric penteracts: Sym2(2) ⊗ Sym3(2)
12 Quadruply symmetric penteracts: 2 ⊗ Sym4(2)
13 Quintuply symmetric penteracts: Sym5(2)
14 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 4
15 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ Sym2(4)
16 Sym2(2) ⊗ Sym2(4)
17 Applications and connections
2
16
23
28
31
40
43
47
52
56
60
64
70
72
74
1. Introduction
An important classical problem is that of classifying the orbits of a repre-
sentation, over a field or over a ring, in terms of suitable algebraic or geometric
objects over that field or ring; conversely, one may wish to construct representa-
tions whose orbits parametrize given algebraic or geometric objects of interest.
In recent years, there have been a number of arithmetic applications of
such "orbit parametrizations" for geometric objects of dimension 0 and of
dimension 1. For example, for extensions of a field, or ring extensions and
ideal classes in those extensions, such parametrizations have been studied in
numerous papers, including [29, 76, 7, 8, 9, 11, 74, 75]; these descriptions of
the moduli spaces have been used in an essential way in many applications (see,
e.g., [28, 10, 12, 19, 69, 73]).
In fact, many of the cleanest and most useful
such bijections between rings/ideal classes and orbits of representations have
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
3
arisen in cases where the representation is prehomogeneous, i.e., where the ring
of (relative) invariants is a polynomial ring with one generator.
In the case of curves, recent work on orbit parametrizations in cases of
arithmetic interest over a general base field include [16] for genus one curves and
[15, 70] for various types of higher genus curves. Numerous examples have also
been previously considered by algebraic geometers, even classically, often giving
descriptions of the coarse moduli space as a GIT quotient. As before, many
of the most arithmetically useful bijections between data relating to algebraic
curves and orbits of representations have arisen in cases where the representation
has somewhat simple invariant theory - in particular, when the representation
is coregular, meaning that the ring of relative invariants is a polynomial ring.
In these cases, the coarse moduli space of the geometric data is thus (an open
subvariety of) a weighted projective space. In conjunction with geometry-of-
numbers and other analytic counting and sieve arguments, such representations
have seen applications in bounding average ranks in families of elliptic curves
over Q (see, e.g., [17, 18]) and showing that many curves in families of higher
genus have few rational points (see [15, 62, 67, 13]).
A natural next step is to determine representations whose orbits parametrize
geometric data of interest associated to algebraic surfaces. K3 surfaces form
a rich class of surfaces that naturally lend themselves to such a study, and in
fact, there has already been significant work in this direction (albeit usually
over algebraically closed fields). For example, it is classically known that a
general polarized K3 surface of genus g = 3, 4, or 5 may be described as a
complete intersection in projective space Pg, and such descriptions may be easily
translated into the language of orbits of a representation of an algebraic group.
For polarized K3 surfaces of higher genus, Mukai and others have also described
them in several cases as complete intersections in homogeneous spaces (see, e.g.,
[53, 54, 55]). A sample of these results for polarizations of small degree appears
in Table 2.
The purpose of this paper is to generalize these ideas to study moduli spaces
of K3 surfaces with possibly multiple line bundles, namely lattice-polarized K3
surfaces, in terms of the orbits of suitable representations. More precisely, the
classes of line bundles in the Picard group of a K3 surface X naturally form
a lattice, with the symmetric bilinear pairing being the intersection pairing on
divisors of the surface; this is called the N´eron-Severi lattice of X. There is a
coarse moduli space MΛ of K3 surfaces whose N´eron-Severi lattice contains a
fixed lattice Λ.1 It is a quasi-projective variety, but in general it is very difficult
1 We will actually work with a slight modification of this moduli space; see §2.2.
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
4
to explicitly describe it by equations or to understand its geometry, especially
if rank(Λ) > 1. We show that there are at least 19 representations of algebraic
groups whose orbits naturally parametrize such lattice-polarized K3 surfaces.
We list them in Table 1. Some of these orbit parametrizations are classical, but
most of the higher rank cases appear to be new.
Just as 2 × 2 × 2 cubical matrices played a key role in the understanding of
many prehomogeneous representations [7], and just as 3 × 3 × 3 and 2 × 2 × 2 × 2
matrices played a key role in the understanding of coregular representations
associated to genus one curves [16], we find that 4 × 4 × 4 and 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2
matrices appear as fundamental cases for our study of K3 surfaces. We refer
to these cases as the "Rubik's revenge" and "penteract" cases, respectively.
We also study orbits on symmetrized versions of these spaces, which turn out
to correspond to moduli spaces of K3 surfaces of higher rank. For example,
we show that GL2-orbits on the space of quintuply symmetric penteracts-i.e.,
binary quintic forms-correspond to elements of a certain family of K3 surfaces
having rank at least 18.
We now state our main theorem more precisely. Given a K3 surface defined
over a field F having algebraic closure F , let NS(X) denote the N´eron-Severi
group of X, i.e., the group of divisors on X over F modulo algebraic equivalence.
Let NS(X) be NS(XF ).
(When F is algebraically closed, we have NS(X) =
NS(X).) Then we define a lattice-polarized K3 surface over F as follows.
Definition 1.1. Let Λ be an even nondegenerate lattice with signature (1, s) with
a choice of basis, and let Σ be a saturated sublattice of Λ. Then we say that
a K3 surface X over F is lattice-polarized by (Λ, Σ) if there exists a primitive
lattice embedding φ : Λ → NS(X) such that φ(Σ) is fixed pointwise by the action
of Gal(F /F) and the image under φ of a certain subset C(Λ) of Λ contains an
ample divisor class of X.
We now define the subset C(Λ). Let Z(Λ) := {z ∈ Λ : hz, zi = −2} be the
set of roots of Λ. Fix a partitioning of Z(Λ) into two subsets Z(Λ)+ and Z(Λ)−,
where Z(Λ)− = {−z : z ∈ Z(Λ)+} and each is closed under positive finite sums;
also fix a connected component V of the cone {z ∈ Λ ⊗ R : hz, zi > 0}. We then
let C(Λ) be the subset of V ∩ Λ consisting of elements that pair positively with
all z ∈ Z(Λ)+; this is the intersection of Λ with the Weyl chamber defined by the
positive roots.
Let MΛ,Σ denote the moduli space of such pairs (X, φ), where X is a K3
surface lattice-polarized by (Λ, Σ) and φ : Λ → NS(X) is a primitive lattice
embedding, modulo equivalence; two pairs (X, φ) and (Y, ψ) are equivalent if
SL2
SL2
2
SL2 × SL3
SL2
3
SL2
2 × SL4
SL3
4
SL2
3
SL3
2
SL5
2
No. Group Gss
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
SL4
2
SL2
4
SL3
2
2 × SL4
SL3
2
SL2
2
SL4
SL2
2
SL2
SL2 × SL4
SL3
Representation V
Sym8(2) ⊕ Sym12(2)
Sym4(2) ⊗ Sym4(2)
Sym2(2) ⊗ Sym3(3)
2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ Sym2(4)
3 ⊗ 3 ⊕ Sym2(3) ⊗ Sym2(3)
4 ⊗ 4 ⊗ 4
3 ⊗ Sym2(3) ⊕ Sym2(3) ⊗ 3
Sym2(2) ⊗ Sym2(2) ⊗ Sym2(2)
2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 2
Sym2(2) ⊗ Sym2(4)
2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ Sym2(2)
2 ⊗ Sym2(2) ⊗ Sym2(2)
4 ⊗ Sym2(4)
2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 4
2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ Sym3(2)
Sym2(2) ⊗ Sym3(2)
Sym3(4)
2 ⊗ Sym4(2)
Sym5(2)
Rank
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
4
9
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Generic NS
O1 = U
U(2)
O9
O12
O4(2)
O5(2)
O21
U(2) ⊕ h−4i
U(2) ⊕ A2(2)
U ⊕ E7(2)
U ⊕ E7(2)
4
U ⊕ E8(2) ⊕ h−4i
U(4) ⊕ E8 ⊕ h−4i⊕2
h4i ⊕ h−2i⊕4 ⊕ D⊕2
U(2) ⊕ A⊕3
2 ⊕ E6
U ⊕ A⊕2
2 ⊕ E6 ⊕ A3
U(2) ⊕ A2 ⊕ D12
U ⊕ h−8i ⊕ D12 ⊕ A2
U ⊕ A4 ⊕ D12
Section
§3.1
§3.2
§3.3
§3.4
§15
§4
§3.5
§3.6
§7
§16
§8
§5
§10
§14
§9
§11
§6
§12
§13
Table 1: Representations V whose G-orbits parametrize data related to K3 surfaces. The group Gss is a semisimple
algebraic group with a map to the group G, whose kernel is finite and cokernel is solvable. Here OD denotes the lattice
underlying the quadratic ring of discriminant D with the quadratic form being twice the norm form. Root lattices are
normalized to be negative definite, and U (cid:27) O1 denotes the hyperbolic plane.
O
r
b
i
t
P
a
r
a
m
e
t
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
K
3
S
u
r
f
a
c
e
s
5
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
6
there exists an isomorphism f : Y → X and an isometry g : Λ → Λ fixing Σ
pointwise such that the following diagram commutes:
Λ
g
Λ
φ
ψ
NS(X)
f ∗
/ NS(Y).
More generally, if X is a K3 surface that is lattice-polarized by (Λ, Σ), and
if S ⊂ Σ is a subset that spans the Q-vector space Σ ⊗ Q, then we also say that
X is lattice-polarized by (Λ, S ). Similarly, we may speak of the moduli space
MΛ,S := MΛ,Σ.
Remark 1.2. By convention, we assume that the lattice Λ has a class with
positive norm and has a unique embedding in the K3 lattice E2
8 ⊕ U3 (up to
equivalence) in order to define the above moduli space (see [58, 30]); here E8
denotes the unique 8-dimensional negative definite even unimodular lattice and
U the hyperbolic lattice with Gram matrix ( 0 1
1 0 ). In all of the cases we consider,
the lattice Λ will satisfy these properties. If S equals Λ (or contains a set of
generators of Λ) in Definition 1.1, then we obtain the moduli space MΛ of Λ-
polarized K3 surfaces. Furthermore, if the Z-span of S contains a positive class,
then the cover MΛ,S → MΛ is finite.
Then our main theorem is as follows.
Theorem 1.3. Let F be a field of characteristic 0. For any line of Table 1, there
exists an explicit finite subset S of Λ such that the G(F)-orbits of an open subset
of V(F) are in canonical bijection with the F-points of an open subvariety of the
moduli space MΛ,S of K3 surfaces lattice-polarized by (Λ, S ).
In each section, we will specify the relevant subset S of Λ.
Corollary 1.4. The moduli space MΛ,S of (Λ, S )-polarized K3 surfaces is
unirational.
In particular, the moduli space MΛ of Λ-polarized K3 surfaces
is unirational.
A number of the spaces in Table 1 have been studied previously, often from
the point of view of invariants of group actions and not necessarily with a specific
connection to K3 surfaces, and usually over an algebraically closed field. Some
of these results show that many of the moduli spaces in Table 1 are actually
rational over F . For instance, [47] proves the rationality of Nos. 2, 16, and 18;
the rationality of No. 1 follows from [42]. The rationality of No. 17 follows
/
/
/
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
7
from the classical computation of invariants of cubic surfaces, and that of No. 19
from the invariant theory of the binary quintic. It is an interesting problem to
determine exactly which of the spaces in Table 1 are rational over F or over F.
We note that Table 1 is not intended to be a complete classification of all
orbit spaces that are birational to moduli spaces related to lattice-polarized K3
surfaces. For instance, one could consider the space 3 ⊗ 3 ⊗ 4, whose elements
define an unordered set of six points in the plane, or via duality, a set of six lines;
the double cover of the plane branched along the six lines is a K3 surface of
Picard number 16, so over F (but not F), there is a correspondence between these
orbits and such K3 surfaces. Such K3 surfaces have been extensively studied in
the past, e.g., see [48, 56, 46].
As mentioned earlier, in the case where Λ (= Σ) has rank 1, several cases
have been studied previously, and we have recorded them in Table 2. The first
four cases are classical and are easily adapted to give the correct parametrization
over any field, while the last five are more recent and arise in the beautiful work
of Mukai [53]. It is an interesting problem to work out the appropriate forms of
Mukai's representations so that they also parametrize polarized K3 surfaces over
a general field.
Group Gss
Representation V
Degree
SL3
SL4
SL5
SL3 × SL6
SL2
SL8 × SO10
SL6 × SL6
SL4 × Sp6
SL3 × G2
Sym6(3)
Sym4(4)
Sym2(5) ⊕ Sym3(5)
Sym8(2) ⊕ Sym12(2)
3 ⊗ Sym2(6)
8 ⊗ S +(16)
6 ⊗ ∧2(6)
4 ⊗ ∧3
0(6)
3 ⊗ (14)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Table 2: Representations whose orbits parametrize polarized K3 surfaces.
(The cases of degrees 10 to 18 are due to Mukai.)
Figure 1 shows how many of the cases from both Table 1 and Table 2 are
related. In particular, each arrow from a representation V of the group G to a
representation V′ of G′ indicates that there is a group homomorphism τ : G → G′
and a map V → V′ that is G-equivariant with respect to τ. For each arrow, there
is a map between the associated moduli spaces of lattice-polarized K3 surfaces
as well as a reverse inclusion of the corresponding polarization lattices Λ and Σ.
The ranks of the polarization lattices Λ are indicated in the first column.
Sym5(2)
2 ⊗ Sym4(2)
Sym2(2) ⊗ Sym3(2)
2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ Sym3(2)
2 ⊗ Sym2(2) ⊗ Sym2(2)
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
9
4
2
2
1
u❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦
Sym2(2) ⊗ Sym2(4)
2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ Sym2(2)
2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 2
3 Sym2(2) ⊗ Sym2(2) ⊗ Sym2(2)
Sym4(2) ⊗ Sym4(2)
Sym2(2) ⊗ Sym3(3)
3 ⊗ 3 ⊕
Sym2(3) ⊗ Sym2(3)
3 ⊗ Sym2(3) ⊕
Sym2(3) ⊗ 3
2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ Sym2(4)
u❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦
Sym8(2) ⊕ Sym12(2)
!❉❉❉❉❉❉❉❉❉❉❉❉
}④④④④④④④④④④
Sym6(3)
4 ⊗ 4 ⊗ 4
❁❁❁❁❁❁❁❁❁❁
✆✆✆✆✆✆✆✆✆✆
Sym4(4)
Sym3(4)
4 ⊗ Sym2(4)
2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 4
M
a
n
j
u
l
B
h
a
r
g
a
v
a
,
W
e
i
H
o
,
a
n
d
A
b
h
i
n
a
v
K
u
m
a
r
8
3 ⊗ Sym2(6)
4 ⊗ ∧3
0(6)
Figure 1: Covariance relations among orbit parametrizations of lattice-polarized K3 surfaces.
v
v
!
!
z
z
}
}
u
u
!
}
x
x
i
i
d
d
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
9
Such explicit descriptions of the moduli spaces of lattice-polarized K3 sur-
faces also have several other potential applications. For example, these moduli
spaces are related to Noether-Lefschetz divisors, which are special cycles on
moduli spaces of polarized K3 surfaces (see, e.g., [45]). There has also been
a great deal of recent activity surrounding the Noether–Lefschetz conjecture
[49, 6], and it would be interesting to extend the work of Greer–Li–Tian [37]
on the GIT stability of the Mukai models to these spaces of lattice-polarized
K3s.
In many of the new cases listed in Table 1, we also obtain natural automor-
phisms of the corresponding K3 surfaces. Due to their frequently extremely
interesting and rich groups of automorphisms, K3 surfaces have provided a nat-
ural setting in recent years on which to study questions of dynamics (see, e.g.,
[20, 51, 60]; for a nice survey, see [21]). In particular, there has been consider-
able interest in exhibiting positive entropy automorphisms of projective algebraic
K3 surfaces. Recall that the entropy of an automorphism φ of a projective surface
X is defined to be log λ(φ), where λ(φ) is the spectral radius of φ∗ on NS(X) ⊗ R.
When X is defined over C, this definition agrees with the topological entropy
(see [21, §4.4.2]).
Recently, Oguiso [61] showed that any projective algebraic K3 with a fixed-
point-free automorphism of positive entropy must have Picard number at least 2.
He also produced a family of examples with Picard number 2 by considering
the Cayley K3 surfaces, i.e., the K3 surfaces arising from Rubik's revenge
(Line 6 of Table 1). More precisely, he proved that any K3 surface with N´eron-
Severi lattice exactly O5(2) has a fixed-point-free automorphism with entropy
entropy ηRR = 6 log(cid:0) 1+ √5
2
(cid:1) ≈ 2.887 > 0.
The key ingredient is the use of the hyperdeterminant. The hyperdeterminant
is a generalization of the determinant for multidimensional matrices, which was
introduced by Cayley and studied in depth by Gelfand, Kapranov, and Zelevinsky
[35]. For most orbit parametrizations of rings and ideal classes by multidimen-
sional matrices (e.g., all those in [7, 8, 75]), the hyperdeterminant can be shown
to equal the discriminant of the corresponding ring. For most orbit parametriza-
tions of algebraic curves in terms of multidimensional matrices (e.g., all those
ηRR = 6 log(cid:0) 1+ √5
2
(cid:1) > 0. (See also [34].)
Our perspective on the Rubik's revenge case in Section 4 allows us to give a
simpler proof of Oguiso's theorem, and in a stronger form, in Section 17. More
precisely, we prove:
Theorem 1.5. Let X be a K3 surface with line bundles L1 and L2 satisfying
L2
1 = L2
2 = 4 and L1 · L2 = 6. Assume that the projective embedding of X
corresponding to L1 is smooth. Then X has a fixed-point-free automorphism of
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
10
in [16, 4, 14]), the hyperdeterminant can be shown to equal the discriminant of
the corresponding algebraic curve. Thus, for all these parametrizations of data
associated to rings and curves by multidimensional matrices, the nonvanishing
of the hyperdeterminant corresponds to the nondegeneracy of the associated ring
and the nonsingularity of the associated curve, respectively.
The orbit parametrizations (of K3 surfaces by multidimensional matrices)
considered in this paper yield a number of examples where the hyperdeterminant
does not coincide with the discriminant. Indeed, in these cases, we show that the
hyperdeterminant only divides the discriminant of the K3 surface, but is not equal
to it. This raises the question as to the interpretation of the hyperdeterminant
in these cases. We will prove that the nonvanishing of the hyperdeterminant
corresponds precisely to an associated automorphism of the K3 surface being
fixed-point-free. This interpretation is what consequently allows us to prove
Theorem 1.5 for all nonsingular Cayley K3 surfaces.
An additional advantage of our method is that it also naturally extends to
other cases. For example, we may use Line 9 of Table 1 together with our
hyperdeterminant method to produce examples of K3 surfaces of rank 4 having
many fixed-point-free automorphisms of positive entropy:
Theorem 1.6. Let X be a nonsingular K3 surface corresponding to a penteract.
Then X has a fixed-point-free automorphism with entropy log(λpent) ≈ 2.717 > 0,
where λpent = 4 + √13 + q7 + 2 √13 ≈ 15.145 is the unique real root of
x4 − 16x3 + 14x2 − 16x + 1 greater than 1.
In fact, we will show that these K3 surfaces coming from penteracts have
infinitely many automorphisms of positive entropy. Recall that a Salem number
is a real algebraic integer λ > 1 whose conjugates other than λ±1 lie on the unit
circle2; its irreducible minimal polynomial is then called a Salem polynomial
(see [36] for a survey of problems involving Salem numbers). The entropy of an
automorphism of a projective K3 surface is either 0 or the logarithm of a Salem
number [51, §3], and it is an interesting question as to which Salem polynomials
arise from automorphisms of K3 surfaces (see, e.g., [20, 52, 51, 63]).
We obtain a plethora of quadratic and quartic Salem polynomials from the
automorphisms of the K3 surfaces arising from penteracts.
In fact, we will
demonstrate in §7.4 that, for a positive proportion of natural numbers n, both
the polynomials x2 − (4n2 ± 2)x + 1 and x2 − (12n2 ± 2)x + 1 arise as Salem
polynomials of automorphisms of the general K3 surface in the penteract family.
2 We follow the convention of McMullen [51], where the set of Salem numbers includes quadratic
integers with these properties. Another convention is to call such quadratic integers Pisot numbers.
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
11
As a consequence, it follows that all real quadratic fields occur as the splitting
fields of Salem polynomials of automorphisms of general K3 surfaces in this
family.
Other examples, similar to those mentioned in the preceding two theorems,
will be constructed in Section 17; for example, we will construct fixed-point-
free automorphisms on K3 surfaces in certain families having entropy equal to
the logarithm of 3 + 2 √2, 3+ √5
, and 2 + √3, respectively.
2
Outline. This paper is organized as follows. In §2, we give some background
on lattices and K3 surfaces, as well as notation, that will be used throughout
the paper. In §3, we then very briefly discuss some cases from Table 1 that are
classical, e.g., some of the moduli spaces where the general K3 has Picard rank 2.
As seen in Figure 1, these classical examples often appear as covariants of other
cases that we consider in this paper.
The bulk of this paper lies in §§4–16. In each of these sections, we prove
Theorem 1.3 for the specified group G, representation V, lattice Λ, and subset
S of Λ as listed in Table 1. We begin each section with a construction of the
K3 surfaces, and associated line bundles/divisors, obtained from a general G(F)-
orbit of V(F). In many of the sections, we also discuss various automorphisms
of the relevant K3 surfaces arising from these constructions.
Finally, in §17, we consider some connections between these bijections and
hyperdeterminants, as well as some applications to dynamics on K3 surfaces.
2. Preliminaries
2.1. Lattices. A lattice Λ is a free abelian group of finite rank, equipped with
a bilinear pairing h , i : Λ × Λ → Z. We will assume that that pairing is
nondegenerate. A lattice is often described by the Gram matrix G = (hvi, v ji)i j
with respect to a basis v1, . . . , vn of Λ. The discriminant of the lattice is then
det(G) and the discriminant group of Λ is A = Λ∗/Λ, where Λ∗ is the dual lattice.
It is equipped with a discriminant form φ : A×A → Q/Z. The real signature of Λ
is the pair (r+, r
) consisting of the number of positive and negative eigenvalues
of its Gram matrix G. We say that Λ is positive definite (respectively, negative
definite, or indefinite) if r
− , 0). Similarly, one
can define the integral p-adic signatures for every prime p, by considering
Λp = Λ ⊗ Zp and its discriminant group AΛp. These are invariants of the
isomorphism class of the lattice.
We now record for use in this paper some useful theorems regarding embed-
− = 0 (resp., r+ = 0, or r+r
−
dings and isomorphisms of lattices.
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
12
Theorem 2.1. Let Λ be an indefinite integral lattice of rank n ≥ 3 and
discriminant d. Assume that there is no odd prime p such that pn(n−1)/2 d,
and that 2n(n−3)/2+⌊(n+1)/2⌋ ∤ d. Then the class number of the genus of Λ is 1. That
is, Λ is determined by the collection of its real and p-adic signatures.
This theorem is used in Table 1 to identify the various N´eron-Severi lattices that
arise in our orbit problems with direct sums of familiar lattices. For the lower-
rank examples, it is easy to give a direct identification; for higher rank, it suffices
to compute the genus symbols of the N´eron-Severi lattice (defined by a Gram
matrix in the corresponding section), and match them with those of the lattices
given in the table. For brevity, we omit these verifications in the text.
Theorem 2.2 (Nikulin [59, Theorem 1.14.4]). Let M be an even lattice with real
signature (t+, t
) and discriminant form φM, and let Λ be an even unimodular
−
lattice of signature (s+, s
). Suppose that
−
(a) t+ < s+
− < s
−
(b) t
(c) ℓ(AMp) ≤ rank(Λ) − rank(M) − 2 for p , 2
(d) One of the following condition holds at the prime 2.
(i) ℓ(AM2 ) ≤ rank(Λ) − rank(M) − 2, or
(ii) ℓ(AM2 ) = rank(Λ)− rank(M) and φM (cid:27) u+
for some q′.
2 (2)⊕ q′ or φM (cid:27) v
+
2 (2)⊕ q′
Then there exists a unique primitive embedding of M into Λ.
+
Here, ℓ(A) denotes the smallest number of generators of the group A, and u+
2 (2)
2 (2) are specific discriminant forms on certain finite 2-groups (see [59]).
and v
This theorem is the key ingredient in checking that our lattices have unique
primitive embeddings in the K3 lattice. We leave the routine verification to the
interested reader.
2.2. K3 surfaces.
In this subsection, we first recall some basics of K3 surfaces
and explain the existence of a coarse moduli space MΛ,S for a lattice Λ as in
Remark 1.2 and a subset S of Λ. For simplicity, we work over the complex
numbers, though it is possible also to give an algebraic description of lattice-
polarized K3 surfaces [5].
A K3 surface X over F is a projective algebraic nonsingular surface with
trivial canonical bundle and h1(X, OX) = 0. The cohomology group H2(X, Z),
equipped with the cup product form, is a 22-dimensional lattice that is abstractly
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
13
isomorphic to the K3 lattice ΛK3 := E2
8 ⊕ U3, where E8 is the 8-dimensional
negative definite even unimodular lattice and U is the hyperbolic lattice with
Gram matrix ( 0 1
1 0 ). The N´eron-Severi group NS(X) as defined in the introduction
is a primitive sublattice of the K3 lattice, with signature (1, ρ − 1).
We start with the notion of a marked Λ-polarized K3 surface. Pick an
embedding Λ ֒→ ΛK3 (it does not matter which, since all embeddings are
equivalent by assumption). A marking is an isomorphism φ : H2(X, Z) → ΛK3
such that φ−1(Λ) ⊂ NS(X). For such a marked polarized K3 surface, the class of
a regular 2-form ω on X maps under φ to an element z ∈ Λ⊥ ⊗ C, since z pairs
to zero with the algebraic classes. Furthermore, it is easy to see from Hodge
theory that hz, zi > 0 and hz, zi = 0. Therefore, we have z ∈ Ω where Ω is
an open subset of the quadric cone in Λ⊥ ⊗ C defined by these two conditions.
Since the form is unique up to scaling, we obtain a well-defined element of P(Ω).
The map taking (X, φ) to z is called the period mapping. It can be shown that it
yields an isomorphism between the moduli space of marked ample Λ-polarized
K3 surfaces and the complement Ω0 of a union of hyperplanes in Ω.
To remove the marking, let Γ(Λ) be the group
Γ(Λ) = {σ ∈ O(ΛK3) : σ(v ) = v for all v ∈ Λ}.
Then an element σ ∈ Γ(Λ) acts on the moduli space by sending (X, φ) to
(X, φ ◦ σ), which gives an isomorphism of the polarized K3 surfaces. Let ΓΛ be
the image of Γ(Λ) in O(Λ⊥). Then the moduli space of Λ-polarized K3 surfaces
is obtained by taking the quotient by the group action of Γ(Λ). It establishes an
isomorphism with the period domain, obtained by taking the quotient Ω0/ΓΛ.
For more details, we refer the reader to [30].
In this paper, we will require a minor modification of this construction.
Namely, we do not quotient by the pointwise stabilizer of Λ, but only by the
pointwise stabilizer of S . Let
Γ(Λ, S ) = {σ ∈ O(ΛK3) : σ(Λ) = Λ and σ(s) = s for any s ∈ S }.
Then Γ(Λ, S ) contains Γ(Λ) as a subgroup, and is generally strictly larger.3 Let
ΓΛ,S be its image in O(Λ⊥). The moduli space of (Λ, S )-polarized K3 surfaces
is obtained by taking the quotient of the fine moduli space of ample marked Λ-
polarized K3 surfaces by Γ(Λ, S ). From the period mapping, it follows that the
dimension of the space MΛ,S (when S contains a positive divisor) is 20− rank Λ.
We note here a lemma of Nikulin [57, Lemma 3], which will be very useful
in the determination of N´eron-Severi groups of the K3 surfaces studied in this
paper.
3 However, Γ(Λ) is a finite index subgroup of Γ(Λ, S ) if S (or its span) contains a positive/ample
class.
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
14
Lemma 2.3 (Nikulin). Let X be a K3 surface, and E1, . . . , En disjoint smooth
rational curves on X such that 1
2(E1 + · · · + En) ∈ NS(X). Then n ∈ {0, 8, 16}.
The proof is a simple calculation of the Euler characteristic of the double cover
of X branched along the divisorP Ei.
2.3. Notation and conventions. We make some brief remarks on the notation
and conventions used in this paper.
• Unless otherwise stated, we will work over a field F of characteristic 0. We
expect that most of the results also hold for non-supersingular K3 surfaces
in positive characteristic larger than 3.
• For a vector space V, the notation Symn(V) denotes the nth symmetric
power of V as a quotient of V⊗n. However, since we will be working
over a field of characteristic 0, this space is canonically isomorphic to the
subspace Symn(V) of V⊗n and, in fact, it will usually be more natural for
us to view it as the subspace.
• If V is a representation of a group G, we will sometimes consider an action
of Gm × G on V, where Gm acts by scaling.
• We will be denoting various K3 surfaces using indices; in each such case,
any permutation of the subscripts will denote the same surface, e.g., X123
and X132 will refer to the same surface.
• We pass between line bundles and divisors on our K3 surfaces freely, and
we will often use additive notation to denote the tensor product of line
bundles. When working with relations among line bundles, we also use =
to denote an isomorphism (or equivalence among divisors).
• Multilinear forms play a large role in many of our constructions. For
example, for vector spaces V1, V2, and V3, we sometimes denote an
element A of V1 ⊗V2 ⊗V3 as the trilinear form A( · , · , · ), where each · may
also be replaced by an element of the appropriate dual vector space V∨i . By
abuse of notation, we may also allow points of the projective space P(V∨i )
as entries in the multilinear form A when we are only asking about the
vanishing or nonvanishing of A. Finally, the notation Ay x for an element
x ∈ V∨2 is just A( · , x, · ), for example.
• When discussing the induced action of an automorphism of a K3 surface on
the N´eron-Severi group, the matrices will act on row vectors. In particular,
if Q is the matrix of the quadratic form representing the N´eron-Severi
lattice, then we have MQMt = Q for the matrix M of any automorphism.
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
15
3. Some classical moduli spaces for K3 surfaces with low Picard number
We first recall some of the classical cases listed in the first few entries of
Table 1. All but the last of them have Picard number 2, leading to a moduli space
of dimension 20 − 2 = 18. In each case below, we see directly that the moduli
space is unirational and the points in an open subset correspond bijectively to
orbits of a suitable representation of a reductive group. The excluded locus in
each case is a union of Noether–Lefschetz divisors (in the sense of [49]) on the
corresponding moduli space of lattice-polarized K3 surfaces.
For the cases with Picard number 2, the generic N´eron-Severi lattice is even,
of signature (1, 1) and of (absolute) discriminant D. This lattice coincides with
the lattice underlying the quadratic ring OD of discriminant D equipped with
twice the norm bilinear form, i.e., the form hu, vi = N(u + v ) − N(u) − N(v ).
3.1. Elliptic surfaces with section. The simplest indefinite even lattice is the
hyperbolic plane U of discriminant 1. The moduli space of K3 surfaces lattice-
polarized by U is the same as that of elliptic surfaces with section. Over a field of
characteristic not 2 or 3, we may write the Weierstrass equation of such a surface
as
y2 = x3 + a4(t)x + a6(t),
with a4(t) and a6(t) polynomials of degree at most 8 and 12 respectively. (For
such a Weierstrass equation to describe a K3 rather a rational surface, we also
need deg(a4) > 4 or deg(a6) > 6.) Once we quotient by Weierstrass scaling
(x, y) → (λ4x, λ6y) and the PGL2 action on the base P1
t , we obtain a moduli
space of dimension 9 + 13 − 1 − 3 = 18, as expected. This moduli space MU is
clearly unirational, and corresponds to the representation Sym8(2) ⊕ Sym12(2).
3.2. Double covers of P1 × P1. The second discriminant we need to consider is
4, corresponding to the lattice U(2). The corresponding K3 surfaces are double
covers of P1 × P1, branched along a bidegree (4, 4) curve. The pullbacks of the
two hyperplane classes give us line bundles L1 and L2 with L2
2 = 0 and
L1 · L2 = 2. Either of the projections to P1 is a genus one fibration, and exhibits
the surface as an elliptic surface with a 2-section. The moduli space is birational
to the space of orbits of Gm × GL2
3.3. Hypersurfaces of bidegree (2, 3) in P1 × P2. A smooth hypersurface of
bidegree (2, 3) in P1 × P2 is a K3 surface. It has two line bundles L1 and L2
which are pullbacks of the hyperplane classes, and satisfy L2
2 = 2, and
L1 · L2 = 3. The generic N´eron-Severi lattice of this family
2 on Sym4(2) ⊗ Sym4(2).
1 = L2
1 = 0, L2
0 3
3 2! ,
has discriminant 9. The moduli space is birational to the quotient of Sym2(2) ⊗
Sym3(3) by Gm × GL2 × GL3.
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
16
3.4. Complete intersection of bidegree (1, 1) and (2, 2) hypersurfaces in P2 ×
P2. Next, we consider K3 surfaces given as the smooth complete intersection
of bidegree (1, 1) and (2, 2) forms in P2 × P2. This time, the pullbacks L1 and L2
of the two line bundles satisfy L2
i = 2 (since the intersection of two lines on one
of the P2's specifies a point, whence L2
i is obtained by computing the intersection
number of a line and a conic). Similarly, we check that L1 · L2 = 4, from the
intersection number of bidegree (1, 1) and (2, 2) curves on P1 × P1. Therefore,
the generic N´eron-Severi lattice has Gram matrix
2 4
4 2!
with discriminant 12. The moduli space is birational to the quotient of 3 ⊗ 3 ⊕
Sym2(3) ⊗ Sym2(3) by Gm × (G9
a acts by adding to the (2, 2)
form the product of the given bidegree (1, 1) form with another bidegree (1, 1)
form.
3), where G9
a ⋊ GL2
3.5. Complete intersection of bidegree (1, 2) and (2, 1) hypersurfaces in
P2 ×P2. Finally, consider K3 surfaces given as the smooth complete intersection
of bidegree (1, 2) and (2, 1) forms in P2 × P2. As in the case of discriminant 12
above, we obtain the generic N´eron-Severi lattice
2 5
5 2!
of discriminant 21. The moduli space is birational to the quotient of 3⊗Sym2(3)⊕
Sym2(3) ⊗ 3 by GL2
3.
3.6. Hypersurfaces of tridegree (2, 2, 2) in P1 × P1 × P1. Finally, we consider
K3 surfaces defined by the vanishing of a tridegree (2, 2, 2) form on P1 × P1 × P1.
The three line bundles obtained from pulling back OP1(1) have intersection
matrix
0 2 2
2 0 2
2 2 0
.
The moduli space is birational to the quotient of Sym2(2) ⊗ Sym2(2) ⊗ Sym2(2)
by Gm × GL3
2.
4. Rubik's revenge: 4 ⊗ 4 ⊗ 4
We begin with a space of K3 surfaces that has been well-studied in the
classical literature in algebraic geometry [23, 68, 41, 65], as well as more
recently [4, 61, 34]: that of determinantal quartics. Our perspective is slightly
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
17
different, however, allowing us to unify several existing results in the literature;
in particular, we classify orbits on the space of 4 × 4 × 4 cubical matrices over a
general field F in terms of moduli spaces of certain lattice-polarized K3 surfaces
of Picard rank 2 over F, allowing general ADE singularities. The constructions
we use here will also help prepare us for the larger rank cases to follow in later
sections.
Theorem 4.1. Let V1, V2 and V3 be 4-dimensional vector spaces over F. Let
G′ = GL(V1) × GL(V2) × GL(V3), and let V be the representation V1 ⊗ V2 ⊗ V3
of G′. Let G be the quotient of G′ by the kernel of the multiplication map on
scalars, i.e., Gm × Gm × Gm → Gm. Let Λ be the lattice whose Gram matrix is
4 6
6 4! ,
and let S = {e1, e2}. Then the G(F)-orbits of an open subset of V(F) are in
bijection with the F-points of an open subvariety of the moduli space MΛ,S of
nonsingular K3 surfaces lattice-polarized by (Λ, S ).
4.1. Construction of K3 surfaces. We first describe the construction of a K3
surface from an element A ∈ V = V1 ⊗ V2 ⊗ V3, where V1, V2, and V3 are 4-
dimensional F-vector spaces. With bases for V1, V2, and V3, we may view A as a
4 × 4 × 4 cubical matrix (ai jk)1≤i, j,k≤4 with entries in F. For any x ∈ V∨1 , we may
obtain a 4 × 4 matrix Ay x of linear forms in x. The determinant of this matrix is
a form f of degree 4 in four variables, and its vanishing locus is a quartic surface
X1 in P(V∨1 ) (cid:27) P3. We restrict our attention to the general case where X1 has at
most simple isolated singularities, which are thus K3 surfaces; in this case, we
say that A is nondegenerate.
Similarly, we may repeat this construction in the other two directions (re-
placing V1 with V2 or V3) to obtain two more K3 surfaces X2 ⊂ P(V∨2 ) and
X3 ⊂ P(V∨3 ). We claim that these three K3 surfaces are birational to each other.
For example, to exhibit the map X1 99K X2, we view A as a trilinear form on
V∨1 × V∨2 × V∨3 . Then let
X12 := n(x, y) ∈ P(V∨1 ) × P(V∨2 ) : A(x, y, · ) = 0o .
Then we observe that the projections of X12 to P(V∨1 ) and P(V∨2 ) are X1 and X2,
respectively, thereby giving a correspondence between X1 and X2. In particular,
given a point x ∈ X1, the determinant of Ay x vanishes, and the y ∈ X2 such
that (x, y) ∈ X12 are exactly those y (up to scaling) in the kernel of Ay x in V∨2 .
We claim that if the kernel is at least 2-dimensional, then the point x ∈ X1 is
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
18
a singular point. Indeed, if all of the 3 × 3 minors A∗st(x) of Ay x vanish, for
1 ≤ s, t ≤ 4, then so do the partial derivatives
∂ f
∂xi
(x) = Xs,t
cistA∗st(x),
where cist = (−1)s+taist. Hence if x ∈ X1 is nonsingular, then the kernel of Ay x is
exactly 1-dimensional. Generically, if the kernel of Ay x is 2-dimensional, then
x gives an isolated singularity of X1,4 which we call a rank singularity of X1.
(It is possible for X1 to have isolated singularities that are not rank singularities;
see §17.1 for a further discussion of singularities on these surfaces.)
This describes a map ψ12 : X1 99K X2, and it is easy to see that it is
generically an isomorphism, as we may construct the inverse map ψ−1
12 = ψ21 :
X2 99K X1 in the analogous manner. Similarly, we have maps ψi j = ψ−1
ji for all
1 ≤ i , j ≤ 3. However, we note that the composition Φ := ψ31 ◦ ψ23 ◦ ψ12 is not
the identity! The resulting automorphism will be discussed further in §4.4.
The isomorphism classes of the K3 surfaces Xi and maps ψi j are invariant
under the action of the group G. As there is a finite stabilizer group for a generic
point in V (in fact, the stabilizer is trivial; see Lemma 4.3 below), the dimension
of the moduli space of K3 surfaces obtained in this way is 64 − 46 = 18.
4.2. N´eron-Severi lattice. We will see below that the N´eron-Severi lattices of
these K3 surfaces all contain a particular 2-dimensional lattice with Gram matrix
4 6
6 4! .
(1)
The space of K3 surfaces with this lattice polarization has dimension 20−2 = 18.
Therefore, we see that the N´eron-Severi lattice of a generic K3 surface in this
family will be this 2-dimensional lattice above.
To understand the N´eron-Severi group of a K3 surface in our family, say
X1 = X1(A) for a particular choice of A and bases for the vector spaces, we
proceed as follows. Let W be the vanishing locus in X1 of the top left 3× 3 minor
of A(x, · , · ); note that W contains, in particular, all the isolated rank singularities
of X1. The maps ψ12 and ψ13 can be expressed by the minors of the last row and
column, respectively, of A(x, · , · ) (with the appropriate signs). Note that each
of these two sets of minors contains the top 3 × 3 minor of A(x, · , · ). Hence
we see that W contains a divisor equivalent to C = ψ∗12(L2), where L2 is the
hyperplane class of X2 ⊂ P(V∨2 ), and similarly W contains a divisor equivalent to
D = ψ∗13(L3). By direct calculation, we observe that the scheme W is reducible,
4 Furthermore, if the kernel is 3-dimensional, then the surface X1 is a rational surface.
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
19
and generically decomposes into two components, which must therefore be C
and D. In the N´eron-Severi lattice, we therefore have
Ei,
(2)
3H = W = C + D +Xi
where H = L1 is the hyperplane class of X1 and the Ei are the exceptional divisors
over the isolated rank singularities. In the generic case, there are no exceptional
divisors Ei.
We now compute the intersection numbers involving H and C, assuming
there are no exceptional divisors. We have H2 = 4, and C2 = hψ∗12(L2), ψ∗12(L2)i =
2 = 4 and similarly D2 = 4. So we obtain 36 = (3H)2 = C2 + D2 + 2C · D =
L2
4 + 2C · D, giving C · D = 14. Therefore C · 3H = C · (C + D) = 4 + 14 = 18,
leading to C · H = 6. The divisors H and C thus have the intersection matrix (1).
Proposition 4.2. The Picard group of the K3 surface X1 corresponding to a very
general point (in the moduli space of Rubik's revenge cubes) is generated by the
classes of C and H.
Proof. The discriminant of the lattice generated by C and H is 20 = 22· 5, so it is
enough to check that it is 2-saturated. Since C/2 and H/2 have self-intersection
1, which is odd, neither of these classes are in NS(X). Similarly, (C + H)/2 has
self-intersection 5. Therefore NS(X) = ZC + ZH.
Lemma 4.3. A quartic surface X = X1 associated to a very general point in the
moduli space of (Λ, S )-polarized K3 surfaces has no linear automorphisms (i.e.,
induced from PGL4) other than the identity.
Proof. From [58], we have the following description of the automorphism
group. Let O+(NS(X)) be the set of isometries of the N´eron-Severi lattice
which preserve the Kahler cone and Oω(T(X)) be the set of isometries of the
transcendental lattice which preserve the period ω of the K3 surface, up to ±1.
Then
Aut(X) (cid:27) {(g, h) ∈ O+(NS(X)) × Oω(T(X)) : ¯g = ¯h},
where ¯ refers to the natural morphisms from the orthogonal groups of the lattices
NS(X) or T(X) to their discriminant groups, which are isomorphic.
For a general element of the moduli space, the only Hodge isometries of
the transcendental lattice are h = ±Id. Suppose g preserves the class of H and
g(C) = mC + nH for some m, n ∈ Z. Since g(H) · g(C) = H · C = 6, we obtain
6m + 4n = 6. Similarly, g(C) · g(C) = C · C = 4 gives 4m2 + 4n2 + 12mn = 4.
Combining these, we get (m, n) = (1, 0) or (−1, 3). In the first case, we have
g = Id and by the condition on the discriminant group (which is not 2-torsion),
we see that h = Id is forced, leading to the identity automorphism of X. In the
second case, we see that C and D are switched under g; however, since g does
not act by ±1 on the discriminant group, which is generated by (H + C)/10 and
H/2, it does not give an automorphism of X.
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
20
Corollary 4.4. The stabilizer of the action of G on V is generically trivial.
Proof. If g = (g1, g2, g3) stabilizes v ∈ V, then gi gives a linear automorphism
of Xi for each i. Therefore, generically g = 1.
4.3. Moduli problem. This subsection contains the proof of Theorem 4.1. We
have already given a construction from an element of V1 ⊗ V2 ⊗ V3 to a (Λ, S )-
polarized K3 surface. The bulk of the proof is to show the reverse construction.
We start with a well-known lemma; a simple proof may be found in [50] with
more details in [66]. We include this proof below, since it is a useful template
for the proofs of this section.
Lemma 4.5. Let (X, L) be a generic point in the moduli space M4 of K3 surfaces
equipped with a line bundle L with L2 = 4. Then the linear system L embeds X
as a quartic surface in P3.
Proof. By Riemann-Roch, h0(L) + h2(L) ≥ 4, so L or −L is effective. We
may assume the former without loss of generality. For a generic point in the
moduli space, the linear system L contains an irreducible curve C. By Bertini's
It is not difficult to show that
theorem, we may even assume C is smooth.
h1(L) = 0, so h0(L) = 4. Therefore, the associated morphism φL maps X to P3.
Either (i) deg(φ) = 1 and the image is a quartic surface in P3, or (ii) deg(φ) = 2
and the image is a quadric surface, and the curve C is a double cover of a plane
conic branched at 8 points, and therefore a hyperelliptic curve of genus 3. The
second case does not occur generically (see, for instance, the argument in [40,
Remark 2.3.8 and Example 2.3.9] or [1, Exp. VI]), and leads to an increase in
the Picard number.
Remark 4.6. The locus of K3 surfaces for which L does not contain an
irreducible curve (alternatively, has a base locus, necessarily a smooth rational
curve) is a Noether–Lefschetz divisor.
In this unigonal case, the complete
linear system L describes X as an elliptic surface over a twisted cubic in P3.
The hyperelliptic or digonal case (ii) in the proof above also corresponds to a
Noether–Lefschetz divisor.
Most of the proof of Theorem 4.1 will be established in the following result,
which we state separately, since it will also be useful in subsequent sections.
1 = L2
Theorem 4.7. Let X be a K3 surface equipped with two line bundles L1, L2
such that L2
2 = 4 and L1 · L2 = 6. Assume in addition that L1 and L2
correspond to effective divisors C1 and C2 on X that induce maps to P3 whose
images are normal quartic surfaces. Then X arises from a 4 × 4 × 4 matrix via
the construction of §4.1.
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
21
Proof. We consider X as a quartic surface in P3, embedded through the linear
system L1. Then L2 corresponds to a non-hyperelliptic curve C on X of genus 3.
Equivalently, C is projectively normal. It is well-known that the sheaf OX(C) is
arithmetically Cohen-Macaulay (see [4] and for more general hypotheses, [32,
Chapter 4]). Therefore, there is an exact sequence
P3 → j
∗
0 → OP3(−1)4 → O4
L2 → 0,
where j : X → P3 is the embedding as a quartic surface. Taking the long
exact sequence, and using h0(P3, OP3(−1)) = h1(P3, OP3(−1)) = 0, we have an
identification of h0(P3, O4
P3) with h0(X, L2).
Next, tensoring with the exact L1 and taking cohomology, we obtain
L2 ⊗ L1) → H1(OP3)4 = 0.
0 → H0(OP3)4 → H0(OP3(1))4 → H0( j
∗
Thus we obtain a surjective map
µ : H0(X, L1) ⊗ H0(X, L2) → H0(X, L1 ⊗ L2).
(3)
Since each H0(X, Li) is 4-dimensional, the map has a 4-dimensional kernel. Thus,
we obtain a 4×4×4 matrix, giving rise to a determinantal representation of X.
Proof of Theorem 4.1. Given a 4 × 4 × 4 tensor, we have already seen how to
produce a K3 surface X with two line bundles L1 and L2 with the required pairing
matrix.
Conversely, given a K3 surface X with line bundles L1 and L2, Riemann-Roch
shows that either L1 or its inverse is effective, and similarly for L2. Normalizing
so that L1 and L2 are effective, we see that generically (in the moduli space of
lattice-polarized K3 surfaces) each gives a quartic embedding to P3. Therefore,
we may use the result of Theorem 4.7 to produce a 4 × 4 × 4 tensor.
It remains to show that these two constructions are inverse to one another.
Given a K3 surface X with two line bundles L1 and L2 with intersection matrix
(1), let Y12 be the natural image of X in P(H0(X, L1)∨) × P(H0(X, L2)∨) and let Y1
and Y2 be the projections onto the respective factors.
On the other hand, construct the element A ∈ H0(X, L1)⊗ H0(X, L2)⊗ (ker µ)∨
from (X, L1, L2) as above, and let X12, X1, and X2 be the K3 surfaces constructed
from A in the usual way. We claim that X12 = Y12 and Xi = Yi as sets and as
varieties.
By the construction of A from the kernel of µ, we have A(x, y, · ) = 0 for any
point (x, y) ∈ Y12, so Y12 ⊂ X12 and Yi ⊂ Xi. Now the quartic polynomial defining
X1 is not identically zero, because A must have nonzero tensor rank. Therefore,
X1 and Y1 are both given by quartic polynomials and must be the same variety,
and similarly for X12 and Y12.
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
22
Conversely, given a nondegenerate A ∈ V1 ⊗ V2 ⊗ V3, let X be the K3 surface
X12 constructed from A, and let L1 and L2 be the line bundles on X. Then the
vector spaces V1 and H0(X, L1) are naturally isomorphic, as are V2 and H0(X, L2),
and V∨3 may be identified with the kernel of the multiplication map µ in (3). With
these identifications, the element of H0(X, L1) ⊗ H0(X, L2) ⊗ (ker µ)∨ constructed
from this geometric data is well-defined and G-equivalent to the original A.
Remark 4.8. Strictly speaking, we have not shown that, for a generic point of the
moduli space M = MO20 of K3 surfaces lattice-polarized by the two-dimensional
lattice O20 with matrix
4 6
6 4! ,
the two line bundles L1 and L2 give quartic embeddings-we have only showed
this for K3 surfaces lattice-polarized by h4i. Let B ⊂ M4 be the divisor
in M4 corresponding to K3 surfaces for which the polarization is the class
of a hyperelliptic curve; it is 18-dimensional. There are two obvious maps
φi : M → M4, taking (X, L1, L2) to (X, Li). For any value of i ∈ {0, 1}, since
M is 18-dimensional, in principle it is possible that the "bad" subvariety φ−1
i (B)
of M for which the polarization Li gives a hyperelliptic curve coincides with all
of M. However, this does not happen, and there are at least two ways to see why.
First, one may see it directly in this special example, as follows. Suppose L1
gives a 2-to-1 map φ to a quadric surface. Then we have L1 = E + F, where E
and F are pullbacks of the generators of the Picard group of the quadric surface.
They satisfy E2 = F2 = 0 and E · F = 2. However, the original 2-dimensional
lattice has no isotropic vectors, which implies that the locus of "bad" K3 surfaces
is a Noether-Lefschetz divisor in M.
Another more general way to see that generically L1 and L2 should give
quartic embeddings is the following: the locus Z of K3 surfaces for which the
corresponding map is 2-to-1 to a quadric surface, or is composed with a pencil, is
closed in the moduli space M. Therefore, it suffices to show that the moduli space
is irreducible, and to show that it contains a point outside Z. The first assertion
follows (over C) from the description as a quotient of a Hermitian symmetric
domain, and the second from the "forward" construction which produces such a
K3 surface from a 4× 4× 4 cube. We will use this more general method, without
further mention, in the doubly and triply symmetrized cases of Rubik's revenge.
The irreducibility follows from the uniqueness of the embedding of Λ into the
K3 lattice.
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
23
4.4. Automorphisms. Next, let us compute the action of Φ∗ = (ψ31◦ψ23◦ψ12)∗
on the part of the N´eron-Severi lattice given by (1) for K3 surfaces associated to
generic orbits. The relation (2) holds also for the analogous divisors on X2 and
X3, and in the generic case, there are no singularities. We therefore have
3H = C + D
3C = Φ∗(D) + H
3Φ∗(D) = Φ∗(H) + C
3Φ∗(H) = Φ∗(C) + Φ∗(D),
where each relation is the analogue of (2) for X1, X2, X3, and then X1 again, when
applying the ψi j in Φ in turn. Thus, the automorphism Φ∗ acts on the sublattice
N0 := ZH + ZC (cid:27) O20 of NS(X1) by the matrix
in the basis (H, C). It describes an automorphism of infinite order, and in fact
8
M = −3
−8 21 !
Mn = −F6n−2
−F6n
F6n
F6n+2 !
where the Fn denote the Fibonacci numbers F0 = 0, F1 = 1, Fn = Fn−1 + Fn−2.
The group generated by M has index 6 in the integral orthogonal group O(N0, Z)
of N0. For a very general such X (that is, if NS(X) = N0), it can be shown that Φ
generates Aut(X).
Note that the automorphism Φ of X is the same as the automorphism consid-
ered by Cayley [23, §69], and more recently in the context of dynamics on K3
surfaces by Oguiso [61], who showed that for those X having Picard number 2,
the automorphism Φ is fixed-point-free and has positive entropy (see also [34]
for more on this case). In §17.1, we will give a simple proof of this theorem, as
well as of various extensions, using hyperdeterminants.
5. Doubly symmetric Rubik's revenge: 4 ⊗ Sym2(4)
We now consider doubly symmetric 4 × 4 × 4 cubical matrices, namely
elements of the space V1 ⊗ Sym2V2 for 4-dimensional F-vector spaces V1 and
V2. Since the natural injection of V1 ⊗Sym2V2 into V1 ⊗V2 ⊗V2 is equivariant for
the GL(V1)× GL(V2)-actions, one can understand the GL(V1)× GL(V2)-orbits of
V1 ⊗ Sym2V2 using Theorem 4.1.
However, there are some important differences in the geometric data attached
to a general 4 × 4 × 4 cube compared to that attached to a symmetric one. For
a general 4 × 4 × 4 cube, the three resulting K3 surfaces are nonsingular. The
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
24
basic reason is that in the P15 of 4 × 4 matrices, the variety of matrices having
rank at most two is 11-dimensional and thus will not intersect a general P3 ⊂ P15
spanned by four 4 × 4 matrices. As a result, the corresponding determinantal
quartic surface will have no rank singularities and will in fact generically be
smooth.
In the P9 of symmetric 4 × 4 matrices, the matrices having rank at most two
form a 6-dimensional variety of degree 10, namely, the secant variety to the
image of the Veronese embedding P3 ֒→ P9. A general P3 ⊂ P9 spanned by
four 4 × 4 matrices will intersect the variety of matrices of rank ≤ 2 in a zero-
dimensional subscheme of degree 10; consequently, our determinantal quartic
surface will have 10 isolated rank singularities, which are in fact nodes, and
generically, there will be no other singularities.
These K3 surfaces, cut out by determinants of a symmetric 4 × 4 matrix of
linear forms, were also classically studied, and are called quartic symmetroids
[23, 41, 26]. We prove that the general orbits of tensors in V1 ⊗ Sym2V2
correspond to certain K3 surfaces with Picard rank at least 11 over F :
Theorem 5.1. Let V1 and V2 be 4-dimensional vector spaces over F. Let
G′ = GL(V1) × GL(V2), and let G be the quotient of G′ by the kernel of the
natural multiplication map on scalars Gm × Gm → Gm sending (γ1, γ2) to γ1γ2
2.
Let V be the space V1 ⊗ Sym2V2. Let Λ be the lattice given by the Gram matrix
4
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1 −2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0 −2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0 −2
0
0
0
0
0
0 −2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0 −2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0 −2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0 −2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0 −2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 −2
and let S = {e1, e2}. Then the G(F)-orbits of an open subset of V(F) are in
bijection with the F-points of an open subvariety of the moduli space MΛ,S of
nonsingular K3 surfaces lattice-polarized by (Λ, S ).
For a generic A ∈ V1 ⊗ Sym2V2, from the constructions in the previous
section, we obtain nonsingular quartic surfaces X2 and X3 by slicing the cube A
in two directions, whereas in the third direction, we get a quartic surface X1 with
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
25
generically ten A1 singularities. By symmetry, X2 and X3 are in fact identical
surfaces in P(V∨2 ), but we will sometimes refer to these separately in the sequel.
Because contracting the cube in the third direction gives a symmetric matrix,
we see that for a generic point x ∈ X1, the left and right kernels of Ay x are
spanned by the same vector. The map ψ12 : X1 99K X2 has a base locus
consisting of the ten singularities on X1 (since the kernel of Ay x at these ten
points is (generically) two-dimensional), and hence it is the minimal resolution
of these singularities. Similarly, the map ψ21 : X2 → X1 is the blow-down of the
exceptional divisors, so it is just the map ψ−1
12 as a rational map. Furthermore,
while ψ13 ◦ ψ21 is the identity map from X2 to X3, the maps ψ23 and ψ32 are not
the identity map.
5.1. N´eron-Severi lattice. We begin by describing a set of generators for the
N´eron-Severi group for the K3 surface X arising from a very general doubly
symmetric 4×4×4 cubical matrix. Let L1 be the hyperplane class of X = X1 and
L2 be the pullback of the hyperplane class of X2 via ψ12. Finally, let P1, . . . , P10
be the exceptional divisors corresponding to the ten singular points. While L1,
i=1 Pi are defined over F, the Pi individually may not be.
L2, and P10
Proposition 5.2. The Picard group of XF is generated by L1, L2 and the classes
of the Pi.
Proof. We first observe that the dimension of the moduli space of quartic
symmetroids is 10 · 4 − 15 − 15 − 1 = 9. Hence the Picard number is at most 11.
Since the classes of L1 and the ten Pi are all independent, the Picard number is
exactly 11 for a very general point on the moduli space, and there are exactly ten
singular points on the associated quartic surface. We obtain the relation
3L1 = 2L2 +X Pi
(4)
by specializing the relation (2). Hence a basis for the span of all these classes
is given by {L1, L2, P1, . . . , P9}. We easily compute that the discriminant of the
lattice Λ they span is 1024 = 210 and the discriminant group is Z/4Z ⊕ (Z/2Z)8.
It is enough to show that Λ is saturated in NS(X). In fact, by computing the
inverse of the Gram matrix, one immediately checks that any element of the dual
lattice of Λ must have the form
D =
c
4
L1 +
1
2(cid:16)
9
Xi=1
diPi(cid:17),
for integers c and di. Suppose D is in the saturation Λ′ of Λ. If c is odd, then
2 L1 is also in Λ′, which is a contradiction since its self-intersection
is odd. Therefore, we may assume that D has the form
2D−P diPi = c
D =
c
2
L1 +
9
Xi=1
1
2(cid:0)
diPi(cid:1).
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
26
By symmetry, it follows that c
we have 1
Similarly, all the di are even, and then c
above. This concludes the proof.
2(P8
i=1 diPi) + d9P10 ∈ NS(X), and therefore
2 d9(P9 − P10) ∈ NS(X). By Lemma 2.3, this forces d9 to be even.
2 L1 ∈ NS(X), which is a contradiction as
2 L1 + 1
5.2. Moduli problem.
Proof 1 of Theorem 5.1. As before, one direction has already been proved. Start-
ing with a K3 surface X and line bundles L1, L2 and P1, . . . , P10 satisfying the
desired intersection relations, we need to construct a doubly symmetric 4 × 4 × 4
matrix, or equivalently, a symmetric 4 × 4 matrix of linear forms. This construc-
tion is described in, e.g., [32, §4.2] (see also [71, 26]); we briefly sketch the
argument:
Assume without loss of generality that L1 and L2 are very ample. Let Y be
the image of the quartic embedding corresponding to the line bundle L1. For
each i, since P2
i = −2 and Pi · L2 > 0, we have that Pi is effective and thus
corresponds to a smooth rational curve on X. These collapse to singular points
on Y, since L1 · Pi = 0. The surface Y has ten singular points. Next, let F be
the pushforward of L2 from X to Y. We compute that F∨ has the divisor class
−L2 −P Pi. Therefore, the relation
F (cid:27) F∨(3)
holds in the Picard group of Y, so the ACM sheaf F gives a symmetric determi-
nantal representation.
Checking that these constructions are inverse to one another is a similar
verification as in the proof of Theorem 4.1.
We may give a second, more elementary proof of Theorem 5.1, using the
construction in the proof of Theorem 4.1 together with the following lemma:
Lemma 5.3. Let B and C be two n×n matrices over F with C invertible. Assume
BC−1 has distinct eigenvalues over F and that for all x, y ∈ F , the transpose of
the left kernel of Bx−Cy is equal to its right kernel. Then B and C are symmetric
matrices.
Proof. Since det(BC−1 − λI) has distinct roots in F by assumption, the binary
n-ic form det(Bx − Cy) = det(C) det(BC−1x − Iy) has distinct roots [xi
: yi]
(i = 1, . . . , n) in P1(F ). For each i, let vi be a nonzero vector in the right kernel
of Bxi − Cyi, implying that v t
i is a nonzero vector in the left kernel. The vectors
vi are linearly independent, because they are eigenvectors corresponding to the
distinct eigenvalues of BC−1.
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
27
Consider the two symmetric bilinear forms B( · , · ) and C( · , · ) defined by
B(w, z) = wtBz and C(w, z) = wtCz. We wish to show that B and C are symmetric
bilinear forms. To see this, note that v t
i (Bx j − Cy j)v j = 0 for
any i , j. Since (xi, yi) and (x j, y j) are linearly independent (as they yield distinct
points in P1(F )), we conclude that v t
i (Bxi − Cyi)v j = v t
i Bv j = v t
It follows that B and C are diagonal bilinear forms with respect to the basis
v1, . . . , vn. Hence B and C are symmetric bilinear forms, and thus correspond to
symmetric matrices with respect to any basis.
i Cv j = 0 for any i , j.
Proof 2 of Theorem 5.1. Again, we only need to show that the geometric data
gives rise to a doubly symmetric 4 × 4 × 4 matrix. Given (X, L1, L2, P1, . . . , P10),
we use the multiplication map
µ : H0(X, L1) ⊗ H0(X, L2) → H0(X, L1 ⊗ L2)
to obtain a 4 × 4 × 4 matrix A as before. It remains to show that there exists
an identification of V3 := (ker µ)∨ and V2 := H0(X, L2) such that A is doubly
symmetric. Let V1 := H0(X, L1).
The proof of Theorem 4.1 implies that A in turn produces a K3 surface
and line bundles isomorphic to those with which we started. In particular, the
embedding corresponding to L1 has ten singular points, since L1 · Pi = 0 implies
that these (−2)-curves are contracted. Therefore, by applying equation (2) of
§4.2 and comparing with the relation (4), we deduce that the line bundles L2 and
L3 are isomorphic. We therefore have an isomorphism φ : V2 ∼→ V3. Let X1 be
the image of X via the quartic embedding given by L1. For any point x ∈ X1, we
have det(A(x, · , · )) = 0 and the kernel of A(x, · , · ) in V∨2 and in V∨3 is the same
(under φ). In other words, since X1 spans P(V∨1 ), the image of V∨1 in V2 ⊗ V2
given by (Id ⊗ φ) ◦ A is a four-dimensional subspace of V2 ⊗ V2 such that the
"left" and "right" kernels of each element in V∨2 are the same (usually empty, of
course).
We now wish to apply Lemma 5.3 to any two generic matrices in this four-
dimensional space. For two nonsingular elements B and C of V2 ⊗ V2, the matrix
BC−1 will have distinct eigenvalues over F if the binary n-ic form det(Bx − Cy)
has distinct roots, in which case Bx − Cy has rank at least 3 for any values of
x and y. Recall that the K3 surface X1 has only a finite number of isolated
singularities, points x ∈ P(V∨1 ) where A(x, · , · ) has rank 2. For any line in
P(V∨1 ) not passing through one of those singularities, the corresponding pencil
of matrices in P(V2 ⊗ V2) will thus satisfy the conditions of the lemma. That is,
let B and C be nonsingular elements of V2 ⊗ V2 such that their span does not
contain an element with rank less than 3. Lemma 5.3 implies that B and C are
symmetric. We may repeat this process to obtain a basis for the image of V∨1
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
28
in V2 ⊗ V2 only consisting of symmetric elements, thereby giving an element of
V1 ⊗ Sym2V2 as desired.
Since these constructions are inverse to one another in the proof of Theo-
rem 4.1, they are also inverse to one another here.
5.3. Automorphisms. The map Φ = ψ31 ◦ ψ23 ◦ ψ12 : X1 99K X1 considered
in Section 4.4 can be constructed in this situation as well. Though it is only
a birational automorphism of X1, it can be lifted to an actual automorphism of
the blown-up nonsingular model X12. This follows from the general fact that a
birational map between two minimal nonsingular algebraic surfaces with non-
negative Kodaira dimension is an isomorphism (see, for instance, [3, Theorem
10.21]).
First, we observe that Φ is an involution. indeed, the symmetry implies that
ψ12 = ψ13, ψ23 = ψ32, and ψ31 = ψ21, and thus Φ = Φ−1. We now compute its
induced action on the N´eron-Severi group.
The main idea is the same as in §4.4: use the relation (2) repeatedly, as we
apply the maps ψ12, ψ23, ψ31, and ψ12 again. Let L1, L2, and Pi for 1 ≤ i ≤ 10
be the classes introduced earlier. Then we obtain the following equations among
these classes (written additively):
3L1 = 2L2 +Xi
Pi,
3Φ∗(L2) = Φ∗(L1) + L2,
3L2 = L1 + L2,
3Φ∗(L1) = 2Φ∗(L2) +Xi
Φ∗(Pi).
By checking intersection numbers, we compute that Φ∗L1 = −3L1 + 8L2,
Φ∗L2 = −L1 + 3L2, and Φ∗Pi = 2L1 − P j,i P j. The associated transformation
matrix squares to the identity, as expected.
Remark 5.4. The automorphism group of a general quartic symmetroid contans
a subgroup of the automorphism group of a general nodal Enriques surface. The
latter group is a finite-index subgroup of the reflection group W2,4,6 correspond-
ing to the Coxeter diagram of type T2,4,6, and was computed explicitly by Cossec
and Dolgachev [25].
6. Triply symmetric Rubik's revenge: Sym3(4)
We consider next the triply symmetric Rubik's revenge, in order to under-
stand the orbits of Gm × GL(V) on Sym3V for a 4-dimensional vector space V.
Such a cube is doubly symmetric in all three directions, and the three K3's
arising from such a triply symmetric Rubik's revenge are identical. A generic
such triply symmetric Rubik's revenge will thus give rise to a K3 that has at
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
29
least 10 singularities, and a numerical example shows that we obtain exactly 10
singularities in general.
The quartic surface X has been well studied in the classical literature [23, 39,
38, 41], as a Hessian quartic symmetroid, since the matrix of linear forms whose
determinant defines X is the Hessian (the matrix of second partial derivatives) of
a single cubic form F in four variables. For more recent references, see [26, 31].
Generically, over an algebraically closed field, there are five planes tangent
(along a degenerate conic) to such a Hessian surface. If ℓi are the linear forms
defining these planes Zi, the equation of the quartic may be written as
1
a1ℓ1
+ · · · +
1
a5ℓ5
= 0.
1 + · · · + a5ℓ3
for some constants a1, . . . , a5. The cubic form is F = a1ℓ3
5. The ten
singular points are given by the intersections of all ten triples of the hyperplanes
Zi.
In addition, the surface contains ten special lines, which come from the
pairwise intersections of the Zi. Thus, the singular points may be labelled Pi jk
and the lines Llm, with Pi jk lying on Llm exactly when {l, m} ⊂ {i, j, k}. Therefore,
there are three singular points on each special line and three special lines passing
through each singular point. For 1 ≤ i , j ≤ 3, the maps ψi j defined in §4 are all
identical. Denoting them by ψ, it is clear that ψ is a birational involution on the
K3 surface X, blowing up the ten singular points Pi jk and blowing down the Llm.
In fact, it exchanges Pi jk and Llm, where {i, j, k, l, m} = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}.
K3 surfaces with Picard rank at least 16 over F .
Theorem 6.1. Let V1 be a 4-dimensional vector space over F. Let G′ =
Gm × GL(V1) and G be the quotient of G′ by the kernel of the multiplication
map Gm × Gm → Gm given by (λ1, λ2) 7→ λ1λ3
2. Let V be the representation
Sym3V1 of G. Let Λ be the lattice given by the Gram matrix
We show that the general orbits of tensors in Sym3V correspond to certain
4
6
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
1
4
0
0 −2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
−2
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
−2
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
−2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
−2
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
−2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
−2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
−2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
−2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
−2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
−2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
−2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
−2
0
(5)
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
−2
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
30
and let S = {e1, e2}. Then the G(F)-orbits of an open subset of V(F) are in
bijection with the F-points of an open subvariety of the moduli space MΛ,S of
nonsingular K3 surfaces lattice-polarized by (Λ, S ).
6.1. N´eron-Severi lattice. The Picard group of the generic Hessian surface
(base changed to F) is spanned over Z by the classes of the lines Li j and the
exceptional curves corresponding to the singular points Pi jk. The lattice spanned
by these has rank 16 and discriminant −48. Since its discriminant group is
Z/3Z⊕(Z/2Z)4, a case-by-case argument shows that this lattice is the full Picard
group. We omit this proof, since the result is established in [31] (using elliptic
fibrations) and by a different method in [27].
6.2. Moduli problem. We now proceed to the proof of Theorem 6.1. Given a
triply symmetric 4× 4× 4 cube and the resulting K3 surface X, we have seen that
the Picard group of XF is generated by the classes of the ten nodes and lines. Let
H1 and H2 be the hyperplane classes for X1 and X2 respectively. The set
{H1, H2, L12, L13, L14, L23, L34, P123, P124, P125, P134, P135, P145, P234, P235, P245}
is easily checked to be a basis for NS(X), yielding the Gram matrix (5). This
data is fixed up to isomorphism by the action of Gm × GL(V1).
Conversely, given a (Λ, S )-polarized K3 surface, we construct a triply sym-
metric Rubik's revenge by using the second proof of Theorem 5.1. In particular,
we may use that proof to construct a 4 × 4 × 4 cube A in V1 ⊗ V2 ⊗ V3, for certain
four-dimensional vector spaces Vi, where there is an isomorphism φ32 : V3 → V2
so that A is symmetric, i.e., maps to an element of V1⊗Sym2V2 under Id⊗Id⊗φ32.
Here, we may also use the same proof to show that A is symmetric under an
isomorphism φ21 : V2 → V1 , i.e., gives an element of Sym2V1 ⊗ V3 under the
map Id ⊗ φ21 ⊗ Id. Thus, since the transpositions (12) and (23) generate S 3, we
may use φ12 and φ23 to identify all three vector spaces and obtain an element of
Sym3V1.
6.3. Automorphisms. The automorphism group of the Hessian quartic surface
is quite large. In [31], Dolgachev and Keum identified a set of generators for the
automorphism group. However, the relations between these are not completely
known, so a complete presentation for the automorphism group is still unknown.
To connect with the earlier sections, we note that the maps ψ are birational
involutions (recall that they all are identical). In this case, each ψ is also the
same as the 3-cycle Φ described in §4.4 because of the symmetry. We described
above the action induced by this involution on NS(X): the divisors H1 and H2
are switched, and the Pi jk and Llm are switched for {i, j, k, l, m} = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}.
Again, this is studied extensively in [31].
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
31
7. Penteracts (or 5-cubes): 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 2
Let G be the quotient of G′ by the kernel of the multiplication map G5
Consider the representation V = V1 ⊗ V2 ⊗ V3 ⊗ V4 ⊗ V5, where each Vn is a
2-dimensional F-vector space, of the group G′ = GL(V1) × GL(V2) × GL(V3) ×
GL(V4) × GL(V5). With a choice of bases for each Vn for n ∈ {1, . . . , 5}, an
element A ∈ V(F) may be visualized as a 5-dimensional cube, or penteract, with
entries ai jklm ∈ F for i, j, k, l, m ∈ {1, 2}. The space of penteracts is extremely
rich, and indeed the next several sections, through §13, will focus on variations
of this space of penteracts.
m → Gm.
In this section, we will study the G(F)-orbits on V(F), and in particular, describe
the relationship between (an open subvariety of) the orbit space V(F)/G(F) and
the moduli space of certain K3 surfaces having N´eron-Severi rank at least 4:
Theorem 7.1. Let V = V1 ⊗ V2 ⊗ V3 ⊗ V4 ⊗ V5, where each Vn is a 2-dimensional
F-vector space. Let G′ = GL(V1) × GL(V2) × GL(V3) × GL(V4) × GL(V5), and
let G be the quotient of G′ by the kernel of the multiplication map G5
m → Gm.
Let Λ be the lattice whose Gram matrix is
,
(6)
0 2 2 2
2 0 2 2
2 2 0 2
2 2 2 0
and let S = {e1, e2, e3, e4}. Then the G(F)-orbits of an open subset of V(F) are
in bijection with the F-rational points of an open subvariety of the moduli space
MΛ,S of K3 surfaces X lattice-polarized by (Λ, S ).
7.1. Constructions of K3 surfaces. Given a general A ∈ V(F), we construct a
K3 surface with Picard number at least 4 as follows. First, let
X123 := {(v , w, x) ∈ P(V∨1 ) × P(V∨2 ) × P(V∨3 ) : det A(v , w, x, · , · ) = 0}.
We similarly define Xi jk for any subset {i, j, k} in {1, 2, 3, 4, 5} (where permutation
of the indices does not change the variety). The equation defining each Xi jk is a
tridegree (2, 2, 2) form in P1 × P1 × P1 and thus Xi jk is generically a K3 surface;
specifically, we only allow isolated rational double point singularities. Also, let
X1234 := {(v , w, x, y) ∈ P(V∨1 ) × P(V∨2 ) × P(V∨3 ) × P(V∨4 ) : A(v , w, x, y, · ) = 0},
and define Xi jkl for any subset {i, j, k, l} in {1, 2, 3, 4, 5} in the analogous way.
This variety Xi jkl is the intersection of two multidegree (1, 1, 1, 1) forms in
P1 × P1 × P1 × P1, which is also generically a K3 surface. In other words, we can
view the K3 surface as the base locus of a pencil of divisors of type (1, 1, 1, 1) in
(P1)4. Note that the projections from Xi jkl to P(V∨i ) are genus one fibrations.
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
32
For any permutation {i, j, k, l, m} of {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}, there exists a projection
π : Xi jkl → Xi jk, which is an isomorphism for the generic A ∈ V(F). The fiber
of each point (v , w, x) ∈ Xi jk is determined by the kernel of the singular map
A(v , w, x) : V∨l → Vm. If A(v , w, x, · , · ) is the zero matrix, then Xi jk is singular
at (v , w, x), and we then call (v , w, x) a rank singularity. For nonsingular points
(v , w, x) on Xi jk, the bilinear form A(v , w, x, · , · ) has a one-dimensional kernel,
and the fiber of (v , w, x) under the map π is a single point, given algebraically. In
particular, we see that if Xi jk is nonsingular, then it is isomorphic to Xi jkl.
More generally, if Xi jk has an isolated rank singularity at (v , w, x), then the
fiber of π at (v , w, x) is the entire line {(v , w, x, y) ∈ P(V∨i ) × P(V∨j ) × P(V∨k ) ×
P(V∨l ) : y ∈ P(V∨l )}. Since such rational double point singularities are blown up
in one step, the surfaces Xi jkl are nonsingular even when the Xi jk have isolated
rank singularities. We call a penteract nondegenerate if the surfaces Xi jkl are all
nonsingular.
7.2. N´eron-Severi lattice. We now compute the N´eron-Severi lattice of X =
X1234. The surface X comes equipped with the four line bundles Li, given by
the pullbacks of OP(V∨i )(1) for 1 ≤ i ≤ 4. Their intersection numbers are easy
to compute: because of the description of Xi jk as the vanishing of a tridegree
(2, 2, 2) form, we have Li · L j = 2(1 − δi j). As the dimension of the orbit space is
25 − (3 · 5 + 1) = 16, the dimension of NS(X) for a generic X in this family must
be exactly 4. Therefore, although we will find other natural divisors, these four
Li generate the Picard group of the generic K3 surface in this family.
There are other line bundles given by, for example, considering the pullback
of OP(V∨5 )(1) via the isomorphisms X = X1234 → X123 → X1235 followed by the
projection to P(V∨5 ). This particular line bundle L(123)
Lemma 7.2. If X123 is nonsingular (and therefore isomorphic to X), then we
have the relation
satisfies the following:
5
5
L1 + L2 + L3 = L4 + L(123)
(7)
among the above line bundles on X. More generally, if X123 has isolated rational
double point singularities, we have
L1 + L2 + L3 = L4 + L(123)
5
Ei
+Xi
(8)
where the Ei are the line bundles corresponding to the exceptional divisors on X
arising from the singularities on X123.
Proof. We first assume that X123 is smooth. The rational maps ν4 and ν5 from
X123 to P(V∨4 ) and P(V∨5 ), which define L4 and L(123)
, respectively, are each given
5
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
33
by the appropriate kernel of A(v , w, x, · , · ) in V4 ⊗ V5. With a choice of basis
vectors, let
A(v , w, x, · , · ) = A11 A12
A21 A22! ,
: A11] and [−A12
where each Ai j is a tridegree (1, 1, 1) form on P(V∨1 ) × P(V∨2 ) × P(V∨3 ). Then
: A11],
ν4 and ν5 are given by, e.g., the forms [−A21
respectively. It is easy to check that the line bundle ν∗4
OP(V∨4 )(1) is isomorphic
to O(Z(A11, A12)), where Z(A11, A12) refers to the common zero locus of those
two forms; similarly, ν∗5
OP(V∨5 )(1) is isomorphic to O(Z(A11, A21)). Thus, the right
side of (7) is isomorphic to O(Z(A11)), and thus to the pullback of O(1, 1, 1) from
P(V∨1 ) × P(V∨2 ) × P(V∨3 ) to X.
If X123 has isolated rational double point singularities, then for the singular
points (v , w, x), we have that A(v , w, x, · , · ) is identically zero. Thus, the
divisors Z(A11) on X123 contains components corresponding to L4, to L(123)
, and
to each of the singularities, giving (8).
5
We will use versions of the relation of Lemma 7.2 (with permuted indices, as
necessary) to determine how divisor classes interact in many of the subsequent
sections.
Proposition 7.3. For a very general X in this family of K3 surfaces, NS(X) is
spanned over Z by L1, L2, L3, and L4.
Proof. Because this moduli space has dimension 32−16 = 16, the Picard number
of such a very general X is at most 4, and we know that L1, . . . , L4 span a
finite index subgroup of NS(X). The discriminant of the lattice generated by
L1, L2, L3, L4 is −48 = −24 · 3, and we only need to check that it is 2-saturated.
For i , j, the class (Li + L j)/2 cannot be integral, since its self-intersection
is odd, and similarly for (Li + L j + Lk)/2 for i,
j, k distinct. By symmetry,
therefore, Li/2 cannot be in NS(X) (otherwise Li/2 + L j/2 would be). Finally,
if (L1 + L2 + L3 + L4)/2 = L4 + L(123)
/2, and
therefore all Li/2 by symmetry, which is a contradiction.
/2 were in NS(X), so would L(123)
5
5
Lemma 7.4. A K3 surface X123 associated to a very general point in the moduli
space of (Λ, S )-polarized K3 surfaces has no linear automorphisms (i.e., induced
from PGL2 × PGL2 × PGL2) other than the identity.
Proof. We proceed as in the proof of Lemma 4.3. Let g ∈ O+(NS(X)) and
h ∈ Oω(T(X)) agree on the discriminant groups. As before we can assume
h = ±Id. On the other hand, g fixes the classes of L1, L2 and L3. Let
g(L4) = aL1 + bL2 + cL3 + dL4,
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
34
for some integers a, b, c, d. Taking the intersection with g(L1) = L1 through
g(L3) = L3 and using g(Li) · g(L4) = Li · L4, we obtain the equations
2 = 0 + 2b + 2c + 2d
2 = 2a + 0 + 2c + 2d
2 = 2a + 2b + 0 + 2d,
implying a = b = c. These equations reduce to 2 = 4a + 2d, or d = 1 − 2a.
Finally, g(L4)2 = L2
4 = 0 yields a(a + d) = 0. Now a = 0 implies d = 1 and
g = Id, whereas a = −d implies d = −1. But in the latter case, ¯g is not ±Id, a
contradiction. This completes the proof.
Corollary 7.5. The stabilizer of the action of G on V is generically trivial.
Proof. If g = (g1, g2, g3, g4, g5) stabilizes v ∈ V, then each triple (gi, g j, gk) gives
a linear automorphism of Xi jk for each (i, j, k). Therefore, generically g = 1.
is effective, since h0(Li)+h0(L−1
7.3. Reverse construction. We now give the proof of the reverse direction of
Theorem 7.1. We start from the data of a nonsingular K3 surface X with non-
isomorphic line bundles L1, L2, L3 and L4 such that Li · L j = 2(1 − δi j).
It
follows from Riemann-Roch that Li or L−1
i ) ≥ 2.
i
We assume the former without loss of generality, noting that Li L j = 2 forces a
compatible choice. Consider the multiplication map
µ : H0(X, L1)⊗H0(X, L2)⊗H0(X, L3)⊗H0(X, L4) → H0(X, L1⊗L2 ⊗L3⊗L4) (9)
on sections. The dimension of the domain is 24 = 16. Since
(L1 + L2 + L3 + L4)2 = 2 · 2 · 6 = 24,
an easy application of Riemann-Roch on X then yields
h0(X, L1 + L2 + L3 + L4) =
1
2
(L1 + L2 + L3 + L4)2 + χ(OX) =
24
2
+ 2 = 14.
Furthermore, we claim that the map (9) is surjective from repeated applications
of the basepoint-free pencil trick [2, p. 126]. We first check that a number of line
bundles have vanishing H1 groups.
Lemma 7.6. For generic X and for distinct i, j, k, ℓ ∈ {1, 2, 3, 4}, the cohomology
groups H1(X, L−1
k ), and H1(X, Li ⊗ L j ⊗ Lk ⊗
L−1
ℓ ) all vanish.
j ), H1(X, Li ⊗ L j ⊗ L−1
i ), H1(X, Li ⊗ L−1
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
35
Proof. By symmetry, it suffices to check that H1(X, L−1
H1(X, L1⊗L2⊗L−1
Roch and Serre duality for each of these line bundles L implies that
3 ), and H1(X, L1⊗L2⊗L3⊗L−1
1 ), H1(X, L1 ⊗ L−1
2 ),
4 ) all vanish. Note that Riemann-
h1(L) = h0(L) + h0(L−1) − 2 − (L · L)/2.
1 , it is immediate that H0(X, L−1
First, for L = L−1
1 ) = 0 since L1 is effective
and nonzero, and because h0(X, L1) = 2 and L1 · L1 = 0, we conclude that
h1(X, L−1
1 ) = 0. It also follows that the complete linear system described by any
of the Li is a genus one fibration on X.
(10)
Next, for L = L1 ⊗ L−1
Similarly, L = L1 ⊗ L2 ⊗ L−1
2 , we have L2 = (L1 − L2)2 = −4, so h0(L) − h1(L) +
h2(L) = 0. However, L and −L are not effective by genericity (since L · L1 = −2
and (−L) · L2 = −2), so h0 and h2 vanish (the latter by Serre duality). Therefore
h1(L) = 0.
3 has L2 = −4, and furthermore (−L) · L3 = −4,
while L · L1 = L · L2 = 0. We can conclude again by genericity that L and −L are
ineffective. So h1 vanishes for this line bundle as well.
4 , we have L2 = 0, so in fact L or −L must
be effective. In fact, from equation (8), we see that L = L(123)
+ P Ei, and it
immediately follows that −L is not effective (alternatively, the latter also follows
from (−L) · Li < 0). From the Gram matrices for the Picard groups in each case,
one can see that L·Ei = −1, which means that Ei lie in the base locus of the linear
system described by L. Therefore h0(L) = h0(L(123)
) = 2. We obtain h1(L) = 0
from equation (10) above.
Finally, for L = L1 ⊗ L2 ⊗ L3 ⊗ L−1
5
5
Remark 7.7. We will treat several subvarieties of this moduli space (or rather,
finite covers of them) through the various symmetrizations of the penteract, in
subsequent sections. The comments in Remark 4.8 can be adapted to show that
the genericity assumption of the lemma does not exclude these subvarieties.
The proof of surjectivity of the map (9) follows from three applications of
the basepoint-free pencil trick. Therefore, the kernel of µ in (9) has dimension 2,
and we obtain a penteract as an element of H0(X, L1) ⊗ H0(X, L2) ⊗ H0(X, L3) ⊗
H0(X, L4) ⊗ (ker µ)∨, up to the action of G.
Proof of Theorem 7.1. It only remains to show that the two constructions de-
scribed above are inverse to one another. Given a nonsingular K3 surface X with
appropriate line bundles L1, L2, L3, and L4 as in the statement of the theorem, let
Y1234 be the natural image of X in P(H0(X, L1)∨)×P(H0(X, L2)∨)×P(H0(X, L3)∨)×
P(H0(X, L4)∨), and let Yi jk for {i, j, k} ⊂ {1, 2, 3, 4} be the projection onto the ith,
jth, and kth factors.
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
36
On the other hand, construct the penteract A ∈ H0(X, L1) ⊗ H0(X, L2) ⊗
H0(X, L3) ⊗ H0(X, L4) ⊗ (ker µ)∨ from (X, L1, L2, L3, L4) as above, and let X1234
and Xi jk be the K3 surfaces constructed from A in the usual way. By the
construction of A as the kernel of µ, we have A(v , w, x, y, · ) = 0 for any point
(v , w, x, y) ∈ Y1234, so Y1234 ⊂ X1234 and Yi jk ⊂ Xi jk. We claim that X1234 = Y1234
and Xi jk = Yi jk as sets and as varieties.
At least one of the tridegree (2, 2, 2) polynomials fi jk defining Xi jk is not
identically zero; for such a variety Xi jk, we have that Xi jk and Yi jk are both
given by nonzero tridegree (2, 2, 2) forms and thus must be the same variety,
and similarly for X1234 and Y1234. Moreover, because Y1234 is assumed to be
nonsingular, the tensor A is nondegenerate.
Conversely, given a nondegenerate penteract A ∈ V1⊗V2⊗V3⊗V4⊗V5, let X be
the nonsingular K3 surface X1234 constructed from A and L1, L2, L3, L4 be the line
bundles on X. Then the vector spaces Vi and H0(X, Li) are naturally isomorphic
for 1 ≤ i ≤ 4, and V∨5 can be identified with the kernel of the multiplication
map µ from above. With these identifications, the penteract constructed from
this geometric data is well-defined and G-equivalent to the original A.
7.4. Automorphisms. Given a nondegenerate penteract A, we may consider
the following composition of the isomorphisms from §7.1:
α34,5 : X1234 → X124 → X1245 → X125 → X1235 → X123 → X1234.
Since each map is an isomorphism, the entire composition is an automorphism
of X1234. It is easy to see that it is not the identity, however; in fact, a point
(v0, w0, x0, y0) ∈ X1234 ⊂ P(V∨1 )×P(V∨2 )×P(V∨3 )×P(V∨4 ) is sent to (v0, w0, x1, y1),
where x0 and x1 are the two solutions for x in the equation det A(v0, w0, x, · , · ) =
0 (and similarly for y0 and y1).
We may similarly define automorphisms αkl,m of Xi jkl for any permutation
{i, j, k, l, m} of {1, 2, 3, 4, 5} (where the ordering of the indices in the subscript of
α, but not of X, is relevant). For example, the automorphisms αkl,m and αlk,m of
Xi jkl are inverse to one another (and actually the same, as described below), but
αkm,l is an automorphism of Xi jkm.
A more geometric way to describe these automorphisms is by viewing Xi jkl
as a double cover of P(V∨i ) × P(V∨j ); then αkl,m switches the two sheets of this
double cover. It is clear that all of these automorphisms have order two, and thus
αkl,m = αlk,m.
Using the relation (7) and its analogues, we may easily compute how αkl,m
acts on the N´eron-Severi lattice. For example, the automorphism α34,5 is
equivalent to the action of the matrix
1 0
0
0 1
0
2 2 −1
2 2
(11)
0
0
0
0 −1
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
37
on NS(X). Conjugating (11) by 4 × 4 permutation matrices yields all six
automorphisms of the form αkl,5 for k, l ∈ {1, 2, 3, 4}.
For very general X, the group Γpent generated by these automorphisms αkl,m
turns out to have index 60 in the orthogonal group O(NS(X), Z) of NS(X),5 and
therefore also finite index in Aut(X). One way to visualize these automorphisms
is by placing each of the five Xi jkl on a vertex of the 5-cell (a.k.a. 4-simplex)
and by viewing each edge as the isomorphism from Xi jkl to Xi jkm through Xi jk
(again, as defined in §7.1). Then each αkl,m is the traversal of a triangle in the
1-dimensional boundary of the 5-cell.
X2345
X1235
X2345
X1235
X1345
X1234
X1345
X1234
X1245
X1245
α34,5 : X1234 → X1234
Φ51234 : X1234 → X1234
Figure 2: Some automorphisms of the K3 surface associated to a penteract.
These αkl,m's may be composed to yield nontrivial automorphisms that are 4-
and 5-cycles on the boundary of the 5-cell. The 4-cycles give automorphisms
that preserve one of the genus one fibrations and act by translation by a section
of the Jacobian fibration (see [16, §6.2]). It is easy to check that they have fixed
points on reducible fibers of the fibrations.
An example of a 5-cycle is the automorphism
Φ51234 : X1234 → X2345 → X1345 → X1245 → X1235 → X1234,
which is the composition α34,5 ◦ α23,5 ◦ α12,5. Applying Φ51234 to X induces the
5 We are grateful to Igor Rivin for performing this interesting computation.
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
38
action of the matrix
−1 0 2
2
−2 1 2
4
−4 2 5
6
−6 2 8 11
(12)
on Λ in NS(X). By symmetry, all of the 5-cycles that meet all 5 vertices act in a
similar way on NS(X). As we will see in §17.4, these 5-cycle automorphisms of
X turn out to be fixed-point-free in general and have positive entropy.
As mentioned in the introduction, the elements of Γpent are often fixed-point
free and of positive entropy. One obtains many different quadratic and quartic
Salem polynomials as the characteristic polynomials of these automorphisms. In
particular, the N´eron-Severi lattice NS(X) is isomorphic to U(2) ⊕ A2(2) for a
very general X in our family. Therefore, Aut(X) has finite index in O(U ⊕ A2),
which is commensurable to SL2(Z[ω]) where ω denotes a third root of unity6.
One way to see this commensurability is as follows: consider the Hermitian form
over Z[ω] with matrix given by
M =
x
z − ω2w
z − ωw
! .
y
(13)
The discriminant of this form (i.e., the determinant of the matrix) is xy −
(z2 + zw + w2), which is half the quadratic form corresponding to the lattice
U ⊕ A2. Therefore, it is enough to show that a finite index subgroup of the
group SL2(Z[ω]) acts as a group of automorphisms of the Hermitian form (13).
This is readily accomplished by considering the action g · M = gMg†, where
g ∈ SL2(Z[ω]) and g† is the conjugate transpose of g. We omit checking the
standard details, referring the interested reader to, e.g., [22, §13.9, pg. 317].7
The Salem polynomial corresponding to the action of g ∈ SL2(Z[ω]) on the
Hermitian form M is pg(T ) = T 4 − ee′T 3 + (e2 + e′2 − 2)T 2 − ee′T + 1, where
e = Trace(g) and e′ is the conjugate of e. The splitting field of this quartic
polynomial has Galois group isomorphic to the dihedral group D4 of order 8,
and it is also the splitting field of
qg(T ) = NormQ(ω)[T ]/Q[T ] det(g − T · Id)
= NormQ(ω)[T ]/Q[T ](T 2 − eT + 1)
= T 4 − (e + e′)T 3 + (2 + ee′)T 2 − (e + e′)T + 1
6 We are grateful to Curt McMullen for pointing out this commensurability.
7 We may also see this commensurability geometrically by comparing the automorphism group
of the abelian surface E × E (where E = C/Z[ω] is the elliptic curve of j-invariant 0) with the
automorphisms of its transcendental lattice U(−1)⊕ A2(−1). See also Aurel Page's answer in [64],
which outlines a proof that O(U ⊕ A2) is in fact isomorphic to PGL2(Z[ω]).
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
39
over Q. In fact, the fields Kp and Kq obtained by adjoining a root of pg(T ) and
qg(T ), respectively, to Q are dual D4-quartic fields, i.e., they are the fixed fields
of the two subgroups of order 2 (up to conjugacy) in D4 which are interchanged
by the outer involution of D4. In particular, the quadratic resolvent field of Kp is
Q(ω).
It is then easy to deduce that the quadratic Salem polynomials of the automor-
phism group of X generate all real quadratic fields, while the quartic Salem poly-
nomials generate all D4-quartic fields whose quadratic resolvent field is Q(ω).
Below, we indicate how to explicitly find automorphisms to prove the stronger
statement in the introduction about specific quadratic Salem polynomials of the
form x2 − (4n2 ± 2)x + 1 and x2 − (12n2 ± 2)x + 1. A similar analysis using the
unit group of the quartic field Q(ω)[T ]/(T 2 − eT + 1) gives the second half of
our assertion.
Let
and γ2 = α13,5◦α12,5 =
1 −2 2 4
0 −1 2 2
0 −2 3 6
0 1
0
0
.
γ1 = α34,5◦α24,5 =
0
1
0 0
2 −1 2 0
6 −2 3 0
4 −2 2 1
Then it is easily verified that for k ∈ Z, the automorphism γk
Salem polynomial
1γ2 produces the
x2 −(cid:0)4(2k + 1)2 − 2(cid:1)x + 1.
(14)
A positive proportion of the polynomials x2−(4n2 +2)x+1 and x2−(12n2±2)x+1
may also be obtained as Salem polynomials of penteract automorphisms in a
similar way:
(a) For γ1 = α34,5 ◦ α24,5 and γ2 = α14,5, the Salem polynomial corresponding
to the automorphism γk
1γ2 is x2 − (4(2k)2 + 2)x + 1.
(b) For γ1 = α34,5 ◦ α24,5 ◦ α34,5 and γ2 = α23,5 ◦ α12,5, the Salem polynomial
corresponding to the automorphism γ1γk
2 is x2 − (12(2k)2 − 2)x + 1.
(c) For γ1 = α12,5 ◦ α34,5 and γ2 = α23,5 ◦ α34,5 ◦ α24,5 ◦ α34,5, the Salem
2 is x2 − (12(2k + 1)2 +
polynomial corresponding to the automorphism γ1γk
2)x + 1.
Obtaining the Salem polynomials of the form (14) is sufficient to deduce
that all real quadratic fields occur as the splitting fields of Salem polynomials of
automorphisms of general K3 surfaces in our penteract family. To see this, for
each discriminant D of a real quadratic field, we wish to show the existence of a
pair (m, n) of positive integers with m = 2k + 1 such that Dn2 = (4m2 − 2)2 − 4 =
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
40
16m2(m2 − 1), or equivalently, the existence of a pair (m, n′) of positive integers
with m odd such that m2 − Dn′2 = 1 (for we may then set n to be 4mn′). The
latter Brahmagupta-Pell equation is well-known to have infinitely many positive
integer solutions (m, n′) for every discriminant D, even with the restriction that
m is odd, proving the claim.
8. Doubly symmetric penteracts: 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ Sym2(2)
We now consider doubly symmetric penteracts, namely elements of V =
V1 ⊗ V2 ⊗ V3 ⊗ Sym2V4 for 2-dimensional F-vector spaces V1, V2, V3, and V4,
with an action of the group GL(V1)×GL(V2)×GL(V3)×GL(V4). Since the space
of doubly symmetric penteracts maps naturally into the space of all penteracts
from §7 after the identification of V4 and V5, one may understand the orbits of
doubly symmetric penteracts by using constructions from Theorem 7.1. We find
that these orbits correspond to certain K3 surfaces of Picard rank at least 9 over
F :
Theorem 8.1. Let V = V1 ⊗ V2 ⊗ V3 ⊗ Sym2V4 for 2-dimensional F-vector
spaces V1, V2, V3, and V4. Let G′ = GL(V1) × GL(V2) × GL(V3) × GL(V4)
and let G be the quotient of G′ by the kernel of the natural multiplication map
Gm × Gm × Gm × Gm → Gm sending (γ1, γ2, γ3, γ4) 7→ γ1γ2γ3γ2
4. Let Λ be the
lattice whose Gram matrix is
,
(15)
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
−2
0
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
−2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
−2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
−2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
−2
0
and let S = {e1, e2, e3, e4}. Then the G(F)-orbits of an open subset of V(F) are
in bijection with the F-points of an open subvariety of the moduli space MΛ,S of
K3 surfaces X lattice-polarized by (Λ, S ).
Many of the constructions in §7 apply, but there are some important differ-
ences. For a general penteract, the ten different K3 surfaces in P1 × P1 × P1 are
nonsingular. For a doubly symmetric penteract A, however, the locus of (r, s, t)
where A(r, s, t, · , · ) is identically zero is zero-dimensional and of degree 6, as it
is given as the intersection of three (1, 1, 1) forms on P(V∨1 ) × P(V∨2 ) × P(V∨3 ).
Therefore, the K3 surface X123 defined by det A(r, s, t, · , · ) = 0 will have, in
general, 6 isolated (rank) singularities over F . These singularities of X123 are
blown up by the map X1234 → X123, and while these singularities may not be in-
dividually defined over F, the entire degree 6 subscheme is defined over F. It is
easy to check that all of the other Xi jk coming from A are generically nonsingular.
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
41
8.1. N´eron-Severi lattice. To compute the N´eron-Severi group of the nonsin-
gular K3 surface X1234 here, we observe that there still are line bundles Li on
X1234 coming from pulling back OP(V∨i )(1) to X1234 for 1 ≤ i ≤ 4. In addition,
over F , there are six exceptional fibers Ei for 1 ≤ i ≤ 6, coming from the blowups
of the 6 singularities in X123; the sum of these Ei is a divisor defined over F. It
is easy to compute all of the intersection numbers: the only nonzero ones are
Li · L j = 2(1 − δi j), L4 · Ei = 1 for 1 ≤ i ≤ 6, and E2
here, it is slightly simplified because of the symmetry (that is, L4 and L123
isomorphic):
Recall from Lemma 7.2 that there is a relation among the line bundles;
are
i = −2.
5
L1 + L2 + L3 = 2L4 +
6
Xi=1
Ei.
(16)
We thus expect the N´eron-Severi group to generically have rank 9, and in fact, the
intersection matrix of all of these divisor classes may be reduced to the matrix
(15), which is the intersection matrix for L1, . . . , L4, E1, . . . , E5. Note that the
lattice they span has discriminant 28.
Proposition 8.2. For a very general X in this family of K3 surfaces, NS(X) is
spanned over Z by L1, L2, L4, and the Ei, i = 1, . . . , 6.
Proof. Since the moduli space here has dimension 8 · 3 − 13 = 11, the Picard
number of a very general X is at most 9. It is enough to check that the lattice L
spanned by these divisors is 2-saturated. Computation of the discriminant group
shows that any element of the dual lattice may be written as
D =
1
2
(c1L1 + c2L2 + c4L4) +
1
4 X diEi,
with ci, di integers. First, by Lemma 2.3, no divisor of the form (P eiEi)/2, with
ei integers, can be in NS(X), unless all the ei are even. It follows that in the
expression for D, all the di must be even, as 2D − c1L1 − c2L2 − c4L4 would
otherwise be a counterexample to the above observation. So we may assume
that D has the form
D =
1
2(cid:0)c1L1 + c2L2 + c4L4 +
6
Xi=1
eiEi(cid:1).
(17)
Intersection with Ei shows that c4 is an even integer, so we may assume it is
zero. If c1 and c2 are even, then we get a contradiction to Lemma 2.3 as above.
At least one of c1 and c2 is odd, and if both are not odd, we may construct a
divisor D′ ∈ NS(X) by reversing the roles of L1 and L2, by symmetry. Then
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
42
The self-intersection of D is 1 − P e2
D + D′ has the same shape as (17), with both coefficients c1 and c2 odd. So we
may assume c1 = c2 = 1 and all ei ∈ {0, 1} by subtracting an element of L.
i /2 and is then even, so P e2
i = 2 or
6.
If exactly two of the ei are 1, say E1 and E2, then by symmetry each of
the divisors (L1 + L2 + Ei + E j)/2 is in NS(X). Subtracting two of these, we
see that (E1 + E2 + E3 + E4)/2 is in NS(X), which contradicts Lemma 2.3.
Finally, if all six ei are 1, then another application of symmetry shows that
D′ = (L1 + L3 + P Ei) ∈ NS(X). Therefore D − D′ = (L1 − L3)/2 ∈ NS(X),
which is impossible since it has odd self-intersection.
Corollary 8.3. The divisors L1, . . . , L4, E1, . . . , E5 form a basis for NS(X), for X
very general.
8.2. Moduli problem. We now complete the proof of Theorem 8.1.
Proof of Theorem 8.1. The constructions in both directions almost exactly fol-
low those for Theorem 7.1. Given a doubly symmetric penteract, we obtain the
K3 surfaces Xi jk and Xi jkl with the divisor classes (and intersection matrix) as
described above.
On the other hand, given such a K3 surface X lattice-polarized by (Λ, S ), we
must show that the penteract A constructed by the reverse map of §7.3 is doubly
symmetric under an identification of two of the vector spaces. Let L1, L2, L3,
and L4 be line bundles corresponding to the four elements of S (in order). These
are the line bundles used to construct the penteract A ∈ H0(X, L1) ⊗ H0(X, L2) ⊗
H0(X, L3) ⊗ H0(X, L4) ⊗ (ker µ)∨, where µ is the multiplication map (9).
Note that A in turn gives rise to isomorphic K3 surfaces and line bundles, as
well as a fifth line bundle, say L(123)
, via the map from X1234 → X123 99K X1235 →
P(ker µ). In addition, from the intersection matrix (15), we see that there are
six singularities on X123 which are blown up in X1234 (whose exceptional fibers
correspond to the last six rows/columns of the intersection matrix). Thus, using
the relation (8) and the intersection matrix (15), we find that L4 and L(123)
are in
fact isomorphic. Therefore, we may identify the vector spaces V4 := H0(X, L4)
and V5 := (ker µ)∨.
With this identification, the maps from X123 to P(V∨4 ) and P(V∨5 ) are identical
and given in the usual way by taking the appropriate kernels of A(v , w, x, · , · ) ∈
V4 ⊗ V5 for (v , w, x) ∈ X123. The remaining key idea is very simple to check
for a rank one element ζ ∈ V ⊗ V for a 2-
(e.g., explicitly) in this case:
dimensional F-vector space V, if ζ(v , · ) = 0 and ζ( · , v ) = 0, then ζ is in
fact in the symmetric subspace Sym2V of V ⊗ V. Since X123 spans the ambient
space P(H0(X, L1)∨) × P(H0(X, L2)∨) × P(H0(X, L3)∨), the penteract A is in fact
symmetric, i.e., an element of H0(X, L1)⊗H0(X, L2)⊗H0(X, L3)⊗Sym2H0(X, L4),
as desired.
5
5
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
43
8.3. Automorphisms. The automorphisms αi j,k defined in §7.4 are again au-
tomorphisms of the K3 surfaces obtained from doubly symmetric penteracts.
Of course, because of the symmetry in this case, some of these are the same
automorphism, e.g., α14,2 = α15,2.
Moreover, the action of the 5-cycles on the N´eron-Severi lattice is different,
since we now have to take the exceptional divisor classes into account. To
compute this action for the generic K3 surface in this family, we employ the
same methods as for the doubly symmetric Rubik's revenge, namely, repeated
applications of the relation (8) and computations of intersection numbers. For
example, the action of
Φ54321 : X1234 → X1235 → X1245 → X1345 → X2345 → X1234
on NS(X) here is given by the matrix
6
4
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
(18)
.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
5
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2 −4
1 −2
0 −1
1 −1
0 −1
0 −1
0 −1
0 −1
0 −1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
We will look at this automorphism again in §17.4.
By symmetry, all of the 5-cycles that meet all five models Xi jkl are either
analogous to Φ54321 above or to Φ53421. In the latter case, the induced action
on the line bundles Li is similar to that of Φ in the penteract case (from which
the action on the divisors E j may be immediately deduced). These two types of
automorphisms will be shown in §17.4 to be fixed-point-free in general and of
positive entropy.
9. Triply symmetric penteracts: 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ Sym3(2)
Suppose we now have a penteract that is symmetric in the last three coordi-
nates. We prove that the general orbits of such tensors correspond to certain K3
surfaces with Picard rank at least 14 over F :
Theorem 9.1. Let V = V1 ⊗ V2 ⊗ Sym3V3 for 2-dimensional F-vector spaces
V1, V2, V3. Let G′ = GL(V1) × GL(V2) × GL(V3) act on V, and let G be
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
44
the quotient of G′ by the kernel of the map Gm × Gm × Gm → Gm sending
(γ1, γ2, γ3) 7→ γ1γ2γ3
3. Let Λ be the lattice whose Gram matrix is
0
2
0
2
0
2
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
−2
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
−2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
−2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
−2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
−2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
−2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
−2
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
−2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
−2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
2
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
,
(19)
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
−2
and let S = {e1, e2, e3, e4}. Then the G(F)-orbits of an open subset of V(F) are
in bijection with the F-points of an open subvariety of the moduli space MΛ,S of
K3 surfaces X lattice-polarized by (Λ, S ).
9.1. N´eron-Severi lattice. Note that a triply symmetric penteract is also dou-
bly symmetric in any two of the last three coordinates. This implies, from §8,
that the K3 surface X123 (= X124 = X125) has at least six rank singularities (over
F ), and a numerical example shows us that generically there are no other singu-
larities. Meanwhile, the other surfaces X134 and X234 are generically nonsingular,
as are all the Xi jkl.
The maps of the type X1234 → X123 blow up the six singular points on
X123, and thus X1234 contains six lines; call the associated divisor classes Pi for
1 ≤ i ≤ 6. There is also a map X1234 → X124, defined by the identical equations
after switching the 3rd and 4th coordinates, so there are at least twelve lines in
X1234; call the six lines coming from this map Qi for 1 ≤ i ≤ 6. These twelve
lines occur in pairs, say (Pi, Qi) for 1 ≤ i ≤ 6, which are flipped by the birational
involution X123 99K X1234 → X124 = X123.
Recall that there are line bundles L1, L2, L3, and L4 on X1234 coming from the
pullback of OP(V∨i )(1), and by Lemma 7.2, we have the relations
L1 + L2 + L3 = 2L4 +
L1 + L2 + L4 = 2L3 +
6
Xi=1
Xi=1
6
Pi
and
Qi.
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
45
Each of the six pairs of lines (Pi, Qi) determines a single point of intersection.
Explicitly, if the associated singular point on X123 is (v , w, x) ∈ P(V∨1 ) × P(V∨2 ) ×
P(V∨3 ), then the intersection point is (v , w, x, x) ∈ P(V∨1 )×P(V∨2 )×P(V∨3 )×P(V∨3 ).
These are the only six intersection points among all of the Pi and Q j, as
(P Pi) · (P Q j) = 6.
Another way to see that each of these pairs of lines intersect once (and do
not intersect any other lines) is to view X123 as a double cover of P(V∨1 ) × P(V∨2 ),
branched along a bidegree (4, 4) curve. One computes that there are exactly six
A2 singularities on that curve.
The map from X1234 to P(V∨1 ) is a genus one fibration whose discriminant as
a binary form on V1 has degree 24, and it factors as the cube of a degree six form
times an irreducible degree six form. Therefore, the genus one fibration has six
reducible fibers of type I3 (in the sense of Kodaira [43, 44]). These reducible
fibers each consist of three lines in a "triangle"; a distinguished pair of these
lines in each triangle together give us the six pairs of lines described previously.
As a consequence, the N´eron-Severi lattice (over F ) has rank at least 2·6+2 =
14. It is straightforward to compute the intersection numbers of all of the known
divisor classes (the four line bundles from pulling back OP(V∨i )(1) for 1 ≤ i ≤ 4
and the two distinguished lines in each of the six triangles). The only nonzero
intersection numbers are
Li · L j = 2 for i , j,
i = −2,
P2
i = Q2
L3 · Qi = 1,
Pi · Qi = 1.
L4 · Pi = 1,
Taking the basis {L1, . . . , L4, P1, Q1, . . . , P5, Q5}, one obtains the lattice with
Gram matrix (19). This lattice has discriminant −324.
Proposition 9.2. For a very general X in this family of K3 surfaces, NS(X) is
spanned over Z by L1, L2, L4, and the exceptional classes Pi, Qi, i = 1, . . . , 6.
Proof. A dimension count shows that the moduli space in this case has dimen-
sion 4 · 4 − 10 = 6, so the Picard number of a very general X is at most 14. Let Λ
be the lattice spanned by the above classes. First, note that Λ is already spanned
by L1, . . . , L4 and the ten classes Pi, Qi, for i = 1, . . . , 5, since we may solve for
P6 and Q6 from the above relations. Since these remaining fourteen classes are
linearly independent (they have a nonsingular intersection matrix), they form a
basis for Λ.
Let Zi = Pi − Qi. Computing the inverse of the Gram matrix shows that any
element of the dual lattice has the form
D =
1
2
(c1L1 + c2L2) +
1
3
5
Xi=1
diZi
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
46
where ci and di are integers. Suppose D ∈ NS(X). Then 3D ∈ NS(X), from
which it follows that D′ = (c1L1 + c2L2)/2 ∈ NS(X). We claim both c1 and c2
are even. If c1 and c2 are odd, then D′2 is odd, a contradiction. So at least one of
c1 and c2 is even. If one is odd and one is even, we can find another divisor (by
symmetry) with the parities reversed, and adding them will give us an element
with both coefficients odd, a contradiction. Therefore, we may assume
D =
1
3
5
Xi=1
diZi.
We may assume each di ∈ {−1, 0, 1}. But note that Z2
i = −6 and Zi · Z j = 0 for
i , j. Hence D2 = −2(P d2
i )/3, and since this must be an (even) integer, we see
that exactly three of the di must be ±1. Suppose without loss of generality that
(Z1 + Z2 + Z3)/3 ∈ NS(X). Then by symmetry any (Zi + Z j + Zk)/3 ∈ NS(X).
Therefore,
1
3
(Z1 + Z2 + Z3) −
1
3
(Z1 + Z2 + Z4) =
1
3
(Z3 − Z4) ∈ NS(X),
which is impossible, since exactly three of the di are ±1.
9.2. Moduli problem. We now complete the proof of Theorem 9.1.
Proof of Theorem 9.1. The above discussion describes how to construct a K3
surface lattice-polarized by (Λ, S ) from a triply symmetric penteract. It remains
to show that from such data, the penteract A constructed as in §7.3 is in fact
triply symmetric. That is, starting from X lattice-polarized by (Λ, S ), let L1, L2,
L3, and L4 be the line bundles corresponding to the elements of S . Then we
obtain a penteract A ∈ H0(X, L1) ⊗ H0(X, L2) ⊗ H0(X, L3) ⊗ H0(X, L4) ⊗ (ker µ)∨,
where µ is the usual multiplication map on sections.
The rest of the proof builds on that of Theorem 8.1. In particular, that proof
immediately shows that A must be doubly symmetric, i.e., symmetric in the
fourth and fifth tensor factors. (Note that this argument relies on (8) with the
exceptional fibers Pi.) By switching the roles of the indices 3 and 4 in that
argument, and using the Qi for (8), we also see that A is symmetric in the third
and fifth factors. In other words, there are simultaneous identifications of the
vector spaces H0(X, L3), H0(X, L4), and (ker µ)∨ such that A is triply symmetric
in these three factors, i.e., under these identifications, we may think of A as an
element of H0(X, L1) ⊗ H0(X, L2) ⊗ Sym3H0(X, L3).
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
47
9.3. Automorphisms. As in the previous penteract cases, we may again con-
sider many automorphisms of the form αi j,k. All the 5-cycles meeting all five
Xi jkl are equivalent (up to reordering) to one of the following two:
Φ54123 : X1234 → X1235 → X2345 → X1345 → X1245 → X1234
Φ54132 : X1234 → X1235 → X2345 → X1245 → X1345 → X1234.
Using the same techniques as in previous sections, namely, applying Lemma
7.2 and computing intersection numbers, we obtain the action of Φ54123 on the
N´eron-Severi lattice of the K3 surface XF arising from a general triply symmetric
penteract as the matrix
−1
−2
0
−1
0
−1
0
−1
0
−1
0
−1
0
−1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
2
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 −1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 −1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 −1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 −1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 −1
1
1
.
(20)
The induced action of the other automorphism Φ54132 on the line bundles Li and
the exceptional divisors P j is the same (up to reordering) as the action of Φ54321
on Li and E j in the doubly symmetric penteract case, and the induced action on
the Q j may also be immediately computed.
10. Doubly-doubly symmetric penteracts: 2 ⊗ Sym2(2) ⊗ Sym2(2)
Suppose we have a penteract A that is symmetric in the second and third
coordinates, and also in the last two coordinates. Then we may use the theorems
from §§7 and 8 to study the associated orbit problem. We prove that the general
orbits of such tensors correspond to certain K3 surfaces with Picard rank at least
12 over F :
Theorem 10.1. Let V = V1 ⊗ Sym2V2 ⊗ Sym2V3 for 2-dimensional F-vector
spaces V1, V2, V3. Let G′ be the group GL(V1) × GL(V2) × GL(V3), and let G be
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
48
,
(21)
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
−2
the quotient of G′ by the kernel of the multiplication map Gm × Gm × Gm → Gm
2γ2
given by (γ1, γ2, γ3) 7→ γ1γ2
3. Let Λ be the lattice whose Gram matrix is
2
0
2
0
2
0
0
1
1 −2
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
−2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
−2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
−2
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
−2
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
−2
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
−2
0
0
2
0
2
2
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
2
2
0
2
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
and let S = {e1, e2, e3, e4}. Then the G(F)-orbits of an open subset of V(F) are
in bijection with the F-points of an open subvariety of the moduli space MΛ,S of
K3 surfaces X lattice-polarized by (Λ, S ).
10.1. N´eron-Severi lattice and moduli problem.
In order to study the orbits
of doubly-doubly symmetric penteracts, we may use the geometric construction
from §8, since an element of V1 ⊗ Sym2V2 ⊗ Sym2V3 is also an element of
V1⊗V2⊗V2⊗Sym2V3 and V1⊗Sym2V2⊗V3⊗V3. Thus, the K3 surfaces X123 and
X145 each have at least six (rank) singularities over F , and a numerical example
shows us that they generically have exactly six singular points. Meanwhile, for a
generic orbit, all of the other Xi jk (namely, X124, X234 and X345) are nonsingular,
and the maps of the type X1234 → X123 blow up the six singular points.
The nonsingular K3's-which are all naturally isomorphic-thus contain two
sets of six mutually non-intersecting lines, namely the exceptional fibers in X124
coming from the blow-ups X124 ∼→ X1234 → X123 and X124 ∼→ X1245 → X145.
Let Pi and Qi for 1 ≤ i ≤ 6 denote these exceptional fibers from X123 and X145,
respectively. As explained below, each of the six lines in any one set intersects
exactly two lines in the other set.
The map X1234 → P(V∨1 ) is a genus one fibration whose discriminant as a
binary form on V1 is of degree 24 and factors as the product of a fourth power
of a cubic form times an irreducible degree twelve form. Thus the fibration has
three reducible fibers of type I4, i.e., each of these reducible fibers consists of
four lines forming a "rectangle". Each set of six lines in the previous paragraph
contains one pair of parallel lines from each of the three rectangles. That is, with
choices of indices, each rectangle is made up of the lines corresponding to Pi,
Qi, Pi+1, and Qi+1 for i = 1, 3, 5.
To explicitly see this correspondence among the twelve lines, we note that if
r0 ∈ P(V∨1 ) is a point giving a singular fiber in the genus one fibration, then it
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
49
yields two rank singularities (r0, a, b) and (r0, b, a) on X123. The map X124 → X123
blows up these singularities to the lines (r0, a, ∗) and (r0, b, ∗), where we use ∗ to
mean that the coordinate in P(V∨3 ) may vary freely. Similarly, each such r0 gives
two rank singularities (r0, c, d) and (r0, d, c) on X145, and under X124 → X145,
these blow up to lines (r0, ∗, c) and (r0, ∗, d) for any ∗ ∈ P(V∨2 ). Therefore, the
latter two lines each intersect each of the former two lines in a single point,
giving the four intersection points (r0, a, c), (r0, a, d), (r0, b, d), and (r0, b, c) in
X124.
The usual line bundles Li for 1 ≤ i ≤ 4, given as the pullbacks of OP(V∨i )(1) to
X1234, satisfy:
L1 + L2 + L3 = 2L4 +Xi
Pi
and
2L1 − L2 − L3 + 2L4 = Xi
Qi.
(22)
(23)
Of course, (22) is clear from Lemma 7.2, and the second relation (23) comes
from repeated applications of that lemma along each step of the composition
X1234 → X124 → X1245 → X145.
To determine the N´eron-Severi lattice (over F ) of the K3 surface associated
to a generic doubly-doubly symmetric penteract, we use the explicit geometry
and the relations described above in (22) and (23) to compute the intersection
numbers between the divisor classes. The only nonzero intersection numbers are
as follows:
Li · L j = 2 for i , j,
i = −2,
P2
i = Q2
L2 · Q j = L3 · Q j = 1,
L4 · P j = 1,
Pi · Qi = Pi · Qi+1 = Pi+1 · Qi+1 = Pi+1 · Qi = 1 for i ∈ {1, 3, 5}.
The rank of the intersection matrix is 12, and the span of the divisors is a sub-
lattice of NS(X) of discriminant 256. A basis for the N´eron-Severi lattice is
{L1, L2, L4, P1, Q1, P2, P3, Q3, P4, P5, Q5, P6}, and the corresponding Gram ma-
trix is given by (21).
Proposition 10.2. For a generic X in this family of K3 surfaces, NS(X) is
spanned over Z by the Li for i = 1, . . . , 4 and the exceptional classes Pi and
Qi for i = 1, . . . , 6.
Proof. The moduli space of these K3s has dimension 2 · 3 · 3 − 10 = 8, so the
Picard number of the generic surface in this space is at most 12. Let Λ be the
rank 12 lattice spanned by the above divisors (equivalently, with basis {L1, L2,
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
50
L4, P1, Q1, P2, P3, Q3, P4, P5, Q5, P6}). Since the discriminant of Λ is 256, it is
enough to show that it is 2-saturated. Suppose a divisor class
D = α1L1 + α2L2 + α4L4 +
6
Xi=1
βiPi + γ1Q1 + γ3Q3 + γ5Q5
is in NS(X) for some collection of rational numbers αi, β j, γk whose denomi-
nators are powers of 2. Then by symmetry, so is the divisor D′ obtained by
replacing L2 by L3. Then D − D′ = α2(L2 − L3) ∈ NS(X), which forces α2 to
be an integer, since the self-intersection −4α2
2 of this divisor must be an even
integer. So we may assume α2 = 0, and similarly, α4 = 0. Therefore, D has the
form
D = α1L1 +
βiPi + γ1Q1 + γ3Q3 + γ5Q5.
6
Xi=1
Again by symmetry, the divisor D′′ = α1L1 +P6
i=1 βiPi + γ1Q2 + γ3Q4 + γ5Q6 is
also in NS(X). Then D − D′′ ∈ NS(X) forces all the γi to vansh, by Lemma 2.3
(since the Qi are all disjoint (−2)-curves). Hence D = α1L1 + P6
i=1 βiPi. Then
D′′′ = α1L1 + P4
i=1 βiPi + β6P5 + β5P6 is also in NS(X) by symmetry, and
considering D− D′′′ shows that β5 and β6 are equal modulo Z. Similar symmetry
arguments force all the βi to be equal to each other. Hence D = αL1 + β(P Pi).
Then D2 = −6β2 is an even integer, which forces β ∈ Z. Subtracting β(P Pi) ∈ Λ,
we may assume αL1 ∈ NS(X).
In fact, this forces α ∈ Z as well, since L1
is the class of an elliptic fiber and cannot be a nontrivial multiple of another
divisor.
We now complete the proof of Theorem 10.1.
Proof of Theorem 10.1. The above geometric constructions explain how to ob-
tain a (Λ, S )-polarized K3 surface from a doubly-doubly symmetric penteract.
On the other hand, given such a K3 X, let L1, L2, L3, and L4 be line bundles cor-
responding to the elements of S . Then we may use these line bundles as in §7.3
to produce a penteract A ∈ H0(X, L1)⊗H0(X, L2)⊗H0(X, L3)⊗H0(X, L4)⊗(ker µ)∨,
where µ is the usual multiplication map; we now show that it has the appropriate
symmetry.
By the argument in the proof of Theorem 8.1, and using Lemma 7.2, we
immediately see that there is an identification of H0(X, L4) and (ker µ)∨ such that
A is doubly symmetric in those coordinates.
Similarly, we may switch the roles of the indices 2 and 3 with those of 4
and 5, respectively, to obtain the second symmetry. For example, we may use
A to construct K3 surfaces X1245 and X145 (with the divisor classes in Λ). The
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
51
line bundles Mi coming from pulling back OP(Vi)∨(1) to X1245 via projection for
i = 1, 2, 4, 5 may be used to make another penteract B, which is GL5
2-equivalent
to A (by the proof of Theorem 7.1). (Note that in fact Mi and Li are isomorphic
for i = 1, 2, 4.) Then the same argument as in Theorem 8.1 shows that the line
bundle M2 is isomorphic to the line bundle M(145)
, and in fact, the corresponding
vector spaces may be identified so that B is symmetric in those two directions.
3
Therefore, via the above identifications of vector spaces, our penteract A
may be viewed as an element of the tensor space H0(X, L1) ⊗ Sym2H0(X, L2) ⊗
Sym2H0(X, L4), as desired.
10.2. Automorphisms. We may again consider the automorphisms αi j,k for
doubly-doubly symmetric penteracts. By symmetry, to understand the 5-cycles
passing through all five Xi jkl, which are all compositions of three αi j,k's, it suffices
to understand the following three:
Φ53214 : X1234 → X1245 → X1345 → X2345 → X1235 → X1234,
Φ53421 : X1234 → X1245 → X1235 → X1345 → X2345 → X1234,
or Φ53241 : X1234 → X1245 → X1345 → X1235 → X2345 → X1234,
We first study the 5-cycle Φ54321. Applying Lemma 7.2 and determining inter-
section numbers, we compute the action of the automorphism Φ54321 on NS(X)
arising from a general doubly doubly symmetric penteract as the matrix
4 −2
2 −1
0
1
1 −1
1
0
1 −1
0
1
1
0
1 −1
0
1
1
0
1 −1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
2
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0 −1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
−1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
−1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
−1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
−1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
−1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
−1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
−1
(24)
with respect to the basis {L1, L2, L3, L4, P1, Q1, P2, P3, Q3, P4, P5, Q5}.
The induced action of the automorphism Φ53421 on the Li is the same (up to
reordering) as in the usual penteract case (and it is thus simple to compute the
action on the exceptional divisors). For the automorphism Φ53241, the induced
action on the Li and the exceptional divisors Q j are the same (up to reordering)
as the induced action of Φ54321 in the doubly symmetric penteract case.
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
52
11. Doubly-triply symmetric penteracts: Sym2(2) ⊗ Sym3(2)
M2
We now study penteracts that are symmetric in the first two coordinates and
also symmetric in the last three coordinates. We prove that the orbits of the
space of doubly-triply symmetric penteracts are related to certain K3 surfaces
with N´eron-Severi rank at least 15 over F . Note that these penteracts also have
an interpretation as bidegree (2, 3) curves in P1×P1, which can be used to connect
the moduli space below with the universal Picard scheme Pic1
over the moduli
space of genus 2 curves.
Theorem 11.1. Let V = Sym2V1 ⊗ Sym3V2 for 2-dimensional F-vector spaces
V1 and V2. Let G′ be the group Gm × GL(V1)× GL(V2), and let G be the quotient
of G′ by the kernel of the multiplication map Gm × Gm × Gm → Gm given by
(γ1, γ2, γ3) 7→ γ1γ2
2γ3
2
0
2
0
2
0
0
1
1 −2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
3. Let Λ be the lattice whose Gram matrix is
0
0
0
1
0
0
−2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
−2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
−2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
2
0
2
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
−2
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
−2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
−2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
−2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
−2
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
−2
0
0
1
and let S = {e1, e2, e3, e4}. Then the G(F)-orbits of an open subset of V(F) are
in bijection with the F-points of an open subvariety of the moduli space MΛ,S of
K3 surfaces X lattice-polarized by (Λ, S ).
11.1. N´eron-Severi lattice and moduli problem. By exploiting the double
symmetry in the first two coordinates and triple symmetry in the last three
coordinates, we may apply the constructions in all of the previous penteract
sections! That is, the space Sym2V1⊗Sym3V2 is a subspace of doubly symmetric
penteracts V1 ⊗ V1 ⊗ V2 ⊗ Sym2V2 or V2 ⊗ V2 ⊗ V2 ⊗ Sym2V1, triply symmetric
penteracts V1 ⊗ V1 ⊗ Sym3V2, and doubly-doubly symmetric penteracts V2 ⊗
Sym2V1 ⊗ Sym2V2.
Given an element of Sym2V1⊗Sym3V2, using the usual notation, we construct
K3 surfaces X123 (= X124 = X125) and X345 that have at least six rank singularities
(over F ). A numerical example shows us that generically there are exactly six
0
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
(25)
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
−2
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
53
singularities on each of X123 and X345. Meanwhile, the other K3 surfaces (X134,
X1234, and X1345) are generically nonsingular and isomorphic, and the maps
X134 → X1234 → X123, X134 → X1234 → X124, and X134 → X1345 → X345 blow
down sets of six lines to each of the corresponding sets of six singular points.
The nonsingular K3 surface X1234 contains at least three sets of six lines; call the
divisors corresponding to these lines Pi, Qi, and Ei, respectively, for 1 ≤ i ≤ 6.
Their intersection numbers are computed below, by using the various genus one
fibrations.
Either projection map from X1234 to P(V∨1 ) is a genus one fibration whose
discriminant is a degree 24 binary form on V1 that factors as the cube of a
degree six form and an irreducible degree six form (as a special case of the
triply symmetric penteract). Thus the fibration has six reducible fibers of type I3.
Each of these reducible fibers consists of three lines in a "triangle"; in each of
the six triangles, there are two distinguished lines that correspond to Pi and Qi,
respectively, for 1 ≤ i ≤ 6.
Either projection map from X1234 to P(V∨2 ) is a genus one fibration with three
reducible fibers of type I4 (as a special case of the doubly-doubly symmetric
penteract). That is, each of the three reducible fibers is a rectangle, and two
of the opposite sides of each rectangle are the 6 lines Ei from the 18 described
above. The other two parallel sides in each rectangle are given by P2 j−1 and P2 j
for 1 ≤ j ≤ 3, for the projection π3 to the third factor of P1; for the projection π4,
we get a similar picture, but with the P's replaced by the Q's.
We explicitly list these 18 lines in X1234. For 1 ≤ j ≤ 3, let (r j, s j) ∈
P(V∨1 )× P(V∨2 ) be distinct images of singular points on X123 under the projection
π12 to P(V∨1 )× P(V∨1 ), where r j , sk for any 1 ≤ j, k ≤ 3. Then the other singular
points will project to (s j, r j) for 1 ≤ j ≤ 3, so the six singular points on X123 will
be, for 1 ≤ j ≤ 3, given by (r j, s j, t j) and (s j, r j, t j) for some t j ∈ P(V∨2 ). Thus,
we obtain four lines in X1234 for each j:
P2 j−1 = (r j, s j, t j, ∗)
P2 j = (s j, r j, t j, ∗)
Q2 j−1 = (r j, s j, ∗, t j),
Q2 j = (s j, r j, ∗, t j),
where we again use ∗ to mean that the coordinate varies freely in the appropriate
P1. These are the six pairs of lines in the reducible I2 fibers in the projection
X1234 → P(V∨1 ), and it is clear that they are the blowups of the singular points
from X123 and X124.
Using these explicit points in projective space, we also see that the six
singular points in X345 are just the points (ti, t j, tk) for the permutations {i, j, k}
of {1, 2, 3}. Therefore, the surface X1234 contains six lines of the form
Ei = (∗, ⋄, t j, tk),
Ei+3 = (∗, ⋄, tk, t j)
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
54
for (i, j, k) ranging over cyclic permutations of (1, 2, 3), where ∗ and ⋄ are varying
coordinates connected by a (1,1) equation. These are the six lines Ei described
above.
The line bundles Li obtained from pulling back OP(V∨i )(1) to X1234, for
1 ≤ i ≤ 4, satisfy the following relations with the exceptional lines:
L1 + L2 + L3 = 2L4 +
L1 + L2 + L4 = 2L3 +
6
Xi=1
Xi=1
6
−L1 − L2 + 2L3 + 2L4 =
6
Xi=1
Ei.
Pi,
Qi,
and
(26)
(27)
(28)
These are obtained from repeated applications of Lemma 7.2. The nonzero
intersections between all these divisors are as follows:
Li · L j = 2 for i , j,
L3 · Qi = 1,
L1 · Ei = L2 · Ei = 1,
L4 · Pi = 1,
Pi · Qi = 1,
P1, P2 intersect E3, E5, P3, P4 intersect E1, E6, P5, P6 intersect E2, E4,
Q1, Q2 intersect E2, E6, Q3, Q4 intersect E3, E4, Q5, Q6 intersect E1, E5,
where "intersect" means has intersection number 1. As a consequence, the
N´eron-Severi lattice of (X1234)F has rank 15 and discriminant 108. A basis for
the lattice consists of the divisors L1, L2, L3, L4, P1, Q1, . . . , P5, Q5, E3, and the
corresponding Gram matrix is (25).
Proposition 11.2. For a very general X in this family of K3 surfaces, NS(X)
is spanned over Z by Li, i = 1, . . . , 4, and the exceptional classes Pi, Qi, Ei,
i = 1, . . . , 6.
Proof. Let Λ be the rank 15 lattice spanned by the Li, Pi, Qi, Ei as in the
statement of the proposition. Consider the elliptic fibration π : X → P(V∨1 ).
Taking the class of the zero section to be
O = −L1 − L2 + 2P1 + Q1 + 2P2 + Q2 + P3 + 2Q3 + P4 + 2Q4 + 3E3,
we see that {P1, Q1}, . . . , {P6, Q6} give the non-identity components of the six
I3 fibers. The curve E1 gives a section Q of height 4/3, whereas the class of
L3 − L2 + L1 + O is a 3-torsion section T . The discriminant of the lattice spanned
by these sections and the components of the fibers is 4/3 · 36/9 = 108, so it is all
of Λ. We must now show that generically, Λ is all of NS(X).
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
55
For a very general X in this family of K3 surfaces, the rank of NS(X) is at
most 15, since the dimension of the moduli space is 3 · 4 − 7 = 5. Since the
discriminant of Λ is 108 = 22 · 33, we just need to check that Λ is 2- and 3-
saturated. We observe from the configuration of fibers that there cannot be a
2-torsion section, and that Q cannot be twice a section Q′, since this would force
the height of Q′ to be 1/3, which is impossible. This checks 2-saturation. For
similar reasons, Q cannot be thrice a point, and there cannot be a 9-torsion point.
So we just need to check that the elliptic surface does not have full 3-torsion.
Observe that if T ′ were another 3-torsion section, independent of T over F3,
then to have height 0 = 4 − 6(2/3), both T and T ′ must intersect non-identity
components of each of the six I3 fibers. But then at least one T + T ′ or T − T ′
cannot satisfy the same property, and yet it is a 3-torsion point. This gives a
contradiction.
We now complete the proof of Theorem 11.1.
Proof of Theorem 11.1. The above discussion explains how to construct a K3
surface lattice-polarized by (Λ, S ) from a doubly-triply symmetric penteract.
Given such a K3 surface X, let L1, L2, L3, and L4 be line bundles on X
corresponding to the elements of S . As in the previous cases, we use the
construction from §7.3 to build a penteract A ∈ H0(X, L1)⊗H0(X, L2)⊗H0(X, L3)⊗
H0(X, L4)⊗(ker µ)∨. The proof of Theorem 9.1 shows that there is a simultaneous
identification of H0(X, L3), H0(X, L4), and (ker µ)∨ that shows that A is triply
symmetric with respect to those coordinates, i.e., we can think of A as an element
of H0(X, L1) ⊗ H0(X, L2) ⊗ Sym3H0(X, L3).
To show the last symmetry, we use an argument similar to that in the proof
of Theorem 10.1. That is, we switch the roles of the indices 1 and 2 with 4
and 5 and apply the proof of Theorem 8.1. Using the intersection matrix (25),
combined with Lemma 7.2, shows that the vector spaces H0(X, L1) and H0(X, L2)
may be identified and A is symmetric in those two coordinates.
Thus, we obtain a penteract A in the space Sym2H0(X, L1) ⊗ Sym3H0(X, L3),
as desired.
11.2. Automorphisms. The automorphisms αi j,k again arise for doubly-triply
symmetric penteracts. The 5-cycles through all five Xi jkl are all equivalent to
either
Φ53214 : X1234 → X1245 → X1345 → X2345 → X1235 → X1234
or Φ52413 : X1234 → X1345 → X1235 → X2345 → X1245 → X1234.
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
56
Applying Lemma 7.2 and computing intersection numbers, we find that the
action of the first automorphism Φ53214 on NS(X) arising from a general doubly-
triply symmetric penteract is given by the matrix
2
−1
1
0
0
0
1
−1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
−1 −1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0 −1 −1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
−1 −1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
−1 −1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
−1 −1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
−1 −1
0
0
(29)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
with respect to the basis {L1, L2, L3, L4, P1, Q1, . . . , P5, Q5, E3}. Also, the in-
duced action of the 5-cycle Φ52413 on the Li and the Q j is the same (up to reorder-
ing) as the induced action of Φ54321 in the doubly symmetric penteract case, and
as in previous cases, expressions for the divisors Φ∗52413P j and Φ∗52413E j follow
immediately. These two types of 5-cycles will be shown in §17.4 to be fixed-
point-free in general and have positive entropy.
12. Quadruply symmetric penteracts: 2 ⊗ Sym4(2)
Suppose we now have a penteract that is symmetric in the last four coordi-
nates; we will show that such penteracts give rise to K3 surfaces with N´eron-
Severi rank at least 17 over F . Note that such tensors may also be viewed as
pencils of binary quartic forms, whose invariant theory was worked out in [72].
Theorem 12.1. Let V = V1 ⊗ Sym4V2 for 2-dimensional F-vector spaces V1 and
V2. Let G′ be the group GL(V1) × GL(V2), and let G be the quotient of G′ by the
kernel of the multiplication map Gm × Gm → Gm given by (γ1, γ2) 7→ γ1γ4
2. Let
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
57
Λ be the lattice whose Gram matrix is
0
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
2
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
2
2
0
2
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0 −2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 −2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 −2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 −2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 −2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 −2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 −2
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1 −2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 −2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 −2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 −2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 −2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1 −2
(30)
and let S = {e1, e2, e3, e4}. Then the G(F)-orbits of an open subset of V(F) are
in bijection with the F-points of an open subvariety of the moduli space MΛ,S of
K3 surfaces X lattice-polarized by (Λ, S ).
12.1. N´eron-Severi lattice and moduli problem. Since quadruply symmetric
penteracts are also triply symmetric in, say, the last three coordinates, we may
use our constructions from §9 to help us analyze these. In particular, the K3
surface X123 (= X1i j for any 2 ≤ i < j) has at least six rank singularities (over F ),
and a numerical example shows that it then generically has exactly six singular
points. Meanwhile, the K3 surfaces Xi jk for 2 ≤ i < j < k ≤ 5 and all Xi jkl are
generically nonsingular, and the maps from X1234 to X1i j for 2 ≤ i < j ≤ 4 blow
down lines to the six singular points on X1i j. We thus have at least 18 lines on
X1234. Denote the lines coming from X123, X124, and X134 by Eℓ4, Eℓ3, and Eℓ2,
respectively, for 1 ≤ ℓ ≤ 6.
The map X1234 → P(V∨1 ) is a genus one fibration whose discriminant as a
binary form on V1 is of degree 24 and factors as the sixth power of a degree three
form times an irreducible degree six form. An argument similar to the doubly-
doubly symmetric case shows that this fibration indeed has three reducible fibers
of type I6, i.e., these reducible fibers each consist of six lines in a "hexagon".
These three sets of six lines, yielding a total of 18 lines, correspond exactly
to the 18 lines in the previous paragraph (each set of six lines in the previous
paragraph contains one pair of parallel lines from each of the three hexagons).
These lines can be written down very explicitly. Let ri for 1 ≤ i ≤ 3 be the
three points in P(V∨1 ) over which the fibration has reducible fibers. Then the six
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
58
singular points in X123 are of the form (ri, si, ti) and (ri, ti, si) for 1 ≤ i ≤ 3, and
each hexagon in X1234 consists of the lines (in cyclic order)
Ei,2 = (ri, ∗, si, ti),
Ei+3,2 = (ri, ∗, ti, si).
Ei,3 = (ri, si, ∗, ti),
Ei+3,3 = (ri, ti, ∗, si),
Ei,4 = (ri, si, ti, ∗),
Ei+3,4 = (ri, ti, si, ∗),
The three projections X1234 → P(V∨2 ) are genus one fibrations with six I3
fibers, that is, triangles of lines. Two of the lines in each triangle come from
our 18 lines. For example, for the projection to the second factor, the triangles
contain the pair (ri, si, ti, ∗) over si and (ri, si, ∗, ti), or the pair (ri, ti, si, ∗) and
(ri, ti, ∗, si) over ti.
If L1, L2, L3, and L4 denote the pullbacks of OP(Vi)∨(1) to X1234 via the
projection maps, we obtain relations like in Lemma 7.2:
L1 + L2 + L3 = 2L4 +
L1 + L2 + L4 = 2L3 +
and L1 + L3 + L4 = 2L2 +
6
6
6
Xℓ=1
Xℓ=1
Xℓ=1
Eℓ4,
Eℓ3,
Eℓ2.
The nonzero intersections of these divisors are as follows:
Li · L j = 2 if i , j,
Li · Eℓi = 1,
Ei, j · Ei′, j′ = 1 if i = i′ and j − j′ = 1,
or if i − i′ = 3 and j − j′ = 2.
Thus, the N´eron-Severi lattice of (X1234)F has rank 17 = 3 · 5 + 2 and
discriminant 96. A basis for the lattice is given by the divisor classes L1, L2,
L3, L4, E12, E13, E14, E42, E43, E22, E23, E24, E52, E53, E31, E32, E33, and the
corresponding Gram matrix is in (30).
Proposition 12.2. For a very general X in this family of K3 surfaces, NS(X) is
spanned by the above divisors.
Proof. We give a proof using elliptic fibrations. Let e1, . . . , e22 be the divisor
classes L1, . . . , L4, E12, . . . , E62, E13, . . . , E63, E14, . . . , E64, and f1, . . . , f17 the
basis chosen. Consider the elliptic fibration with fiber class e2 = f2 (i.e.,
projection to P(V∨2 )). A section is given by Z = 2 f2 − f5 + f6 + 2 f8 + f9, which we
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
59
take to be our zero section. Then {e6, e7}, {e9, e10}, {e12, e13}, {e15, e16}, {e18, e19},
{e20, e21} are the non-identity components of the six I3 fibers. A 3-torsion section
is given by − f1 + f2 + f4 + F. The sections e8, e11, e17 have N´eron-Tate height
pairing
8
3
4
4
4
20
3
6
4
6
20
3
.
The determinant of this matrix is 32/27, and therefore the discriminant of the
lattice spanned by these sections and the fibers is (32/27)·36/32 = 96. Therefore,
it is equal to the lattice Λ spanned by e1, . . . , e22.
We now have to show that Λ is equal to NS(X) for a very general such
K3 surface. As usual, the ranks agree (because the dimension of the moduli
space here is 2 · 5 − 7 = 3), so we only need to show Λ is saturated. Since the
discriminant is 96 = 25·3, we merely need to show that it is 2-saturated. This can
only fail to happen if there is a 2-torsion section (which is not possible because
of the fiber configuration), or if the Mordell-Weil lattice is larger. A direct
calculation (by checking all 23 − 1 representatives) shows that a representative
of a nonzero class in Λ∗/Λ would have height m/3, for m an odd number. But
the height of a section P equals 4 + 2(P · O) minus the sum of the contributions
from the fibers, which are 0 or 2/3, and hence is an even number divided by 3. It
follows that Λ is saturated.
Proof of Theorem 12.1. The above discussion shows that a quadruply symmetric
penteract gives rise to a K3 surface lattice-polarized by (Λ, S ). For the reverse,
the proof is an obvious generalization of that of Theorem 9.1. The main
argument within (coming from the proof of Theorem 8.1) needs to be repeated
three times to show that the constructed penteract is symmetric with respect
to three transpositions, e.g., (25), (35), and (45), of the tensor factors (under
identifications of the corresponding vector spaces).
12.2. Automorphisms. The automorphisms αkl,m and Φi jklm also apply in this
case. All of the 5-cycles, by the symmetry, act in equivalent ways, and in
particular, Φ54321 induces the action of the matrix
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
60
2
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
−1
1
2
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1 −2
2
0
0
0
−1
−1
0
0
1
−1
0
0
0
1
−1
0
0
0
−1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
−1 −1 −1 −1 −1
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
−1 −1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
−1 −1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
−1 −1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
−1 −1
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
−1 −1
−1 −1 −1 −1
−1 −1 −1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
−1 −1 −1 −1 −1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
−1
0
1
0
−1 −1
on the divisors {L1, L2, L3, L4, E12, . . . , E62, E13, . . . , E63, E14, . . . , E64} in NS(X).
This automorphism has order 4 and is fixed-point-free; it will be discussed
further in §17.3. Note, however, that the square of Φ54321 is an involution but not
fixed-point-free over F (see §13.2 for a detailed explanation, which also applies
to this case).
13. Quintuply symmetric penteracts: Sym5(2)
Let us now consider a quintuply symmetric penteract. We will prove that the
general orbits of such tensors correspond to certain K3 surfaces with Picard rank
at least 18 over F . Note that such penteracts also have an interpretation as binary
quintic forms, i.e., degree 5 subschemes of the projective line.
Theorem 13.1. Let V = Sym5V1 for a 2-dimensional F-vector space V1. Let
G′ be the group Gm × GL(V1) and let G be the quotient of G′ by the kernel of
the multiplication map Gm × Gm → Gm given by (γ1, γ2) 7→ γ1γ5
2. Let Λ be the
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
61
lattice whose Gram matrix is
0
0
0
0
0
0
−2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 −2
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0 −2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 −2
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0 −2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 −2
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0 −2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0 −2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0 −2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0 −2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0 −2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 −2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0 −2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 −2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0 −2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0 −2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0 −2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0 −2
(31)
and let S = {e1, e2, e3, e4}. Then the G(F)-orbits of an open subset of V(F) are
in bijection with the F-points of an open subvariety of the moduli space MΛ,S of
K3 surfaces X lattice-polarized by (Λ, S ).
13.1. N´eron-Severi lattice and moduli problem. As before, we may use
the constructions from previous sections; in particular, a quintuply symmetric
penteract is also quadruply symmetric in any four coordinates. By the results
of §12, all the K3 surfaces Xi jk (for any 1 ≤ i < j < k ≤ 5) has at least
six rank singularities (over F ), and it is easy to check numerically that Xi jk
generically has exactly six singular points. Meanwhile, the K3 surfaces Xi jkl
for 1 ≤ i < j < k < l ≤ 5 are generically nonsingular, and for 1 ≤ i < j < k ≤ 4,
the projections X1234 → Xi jk blow up the six singular points lying on each of the
four surfaces Xi jk, yielding 24 lines on X1234.
For {i, j, k, m} = {1, 2, 3, 4}, we denote the six lines coming from the blowup
X1234 → Xi jk by Eσ, for the permutations σ in the symmetric group S 4 with
σ−1(1) = m. Let Li denote the pullback of the line bundle OP(V∨i )(1) to X1234 via
the projection. By Lemma 7.2, we have
Li + L j + Lk = 2Lm + Xσ∈S 4
σ−1(1)=m
Eσ.
(32)
Because of the symmetry, if (a, b, c) is one of the singular points in X123,
then the other five singular points are just permutations of the three coordinates.
Therefore, the 6 lines Eσ in X1234 obtained from blowing up the six singular
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
62
3412
2413
4312
1423
1432
4213
2314
1342
3421
3142
4123
2143
4321
2341
1324
1243
3124
4132
3214
2431
3241
2134
4231
1234
Figure 3: The intersection graph as a Cayley graph of S 4 (also known as the
Nauru graph [33]). Each vertex is given by an element σ ∈ S 4 (represented by
the string σ(1) . . . σ(4)), and the blue, green, and red edges correspond to the
actions of the transposition (12), (13), or (14), respectively.
points in X123 are given by {(τ(a), τ(b), τ(c), ∗)} ⊂ X1234, for each permutation
τ ∈ S 3, where ∗ means that any point of P1 may be used. More generally, the
24 lines are given by the permutations of (a, b, c, ∗). Each line intersects exactly
one of the lines in the other three sets of 6, namely when two of their non-∗
coordinates coincide. If we view these 24 lines as vertices of a graph, with the
edges corresponding to the 36 intersection points, this graph is the generalized
Petersen graph on 12 vertices.
To relate the graph in Figure 3 to the lines in our K3 surface X1234, note that
the vertex corresponding to σ ∈ S 4 represents the line given by the action of σ
on the ordered set (∗, a, b, c). For example, the bottom vertex is the line (∗, a, b, c)
and intersects the lines (a, ∗, b, c), (b, a, ∗, c), and (c, a, b, ∗).
Each of the projections πi : X1234 → P(V∨1 ) to the ith factor, for 1 ≤ i ≤ 4, is a
genus one fibration whose discriminant as a binary form on V1 is again of degree
24 and factors as the sixth power of a degree three form times an irreducible
degree six form. An argument similar to the quadruply symmetric case shows
that this fibration indeed has three reducible fibers of type I6, i.e., these reducible
fibers each consist of six lines in a "hexagon". These account for 18 of the 24
lines encountered earlier, namely the Eσ for σ−1(1) , i; the other 6 lines, via
this projection πi, in fact cover the entire P(V∨1 ). Thus, the intersection of the 24
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
63
lines with one of the reducible fibers is exactly a hexagon of lines and 6 distinct
points.
The intersections among all these divisors can be described as follows:
E2
σ = −2,
1 if there is an edge between the corresponding vertices
0 otherwise.
Li · Eσ = δi,σ−1(1),
Li · L j = 2(1 − δi j),
Eσ · Eσ′ =
The intersection matrix has rank 18, and the lattice generated by these divisors
has discriminant 20, so the N´eron-Severi lattice of (X1234)F has Gram matrix
(31) and has rank 18. A basis for the lattice is given by L1, L2, L3, L4, E4321,
E4312, E4231, E4132, E4213, E3421, E3412, E2431, E1432, E2413, E3241, E3142, E3214
and E2134.
Proposition 13.2. Let Λ be the lattice spanned by the classes of the above
divisors Eσ. Then for the K3 surface X arising from a very general quintuply
symmetric penteract, we have NS(X) = Λ.
Proof. First, note that the dimension of the moduli space of quintuply symmetric
penteracts is 6 − 4 = 2, so the rank of NS(X) for a very general X is 18, which is
the rank of Λ.
Consider the elliptic fibration X → P(V∨1 ). Generically, the root lattice
formed by the non-identity components of the reducible fibers is A3
5. Since
E(1) = E1234 intersects the fiber class in 1, it follows that the elliptic fibration
has a section. The root sublattice has rank 15 and discriminant 63. We check that
the (Jacobian of) the elliptic fibration has a 3-torsion section, in fact defined over
the ground field, and since the Picard number is 18, the only possibility is to have
a non-torsion section of height 20/(216/9) = 5/6 = 4 − 5/6 − 5/6 − 9/6. We can
also check directly that there are no 2-torsion sections, even over the algebraic
closure. For the Picard group to be any larger, it would have to have discriminant
5, and a Mordell-Weil generator of height 5/24, which is impossible with the
fiber configuration.
Proof of Theorem 13.1. The above discussion shows that a quintuply symmetric
penteract produces a K3 surface that is lattice-polarized by (Λ, S ). For the other
direction, like for Theorem 12.1, the proof is a straightforward generalization of
the proof of Theorem 9.1. We construct a penteract from this data, and applying
the argument from Theorem 8.1 four times shows that all five vector spaces
related to the penteract may be identified and that the penteract is symmetric
with respect to any two.
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
64
13.2. Automorphisms. Given a K3 surface X coming from a quintuply sym-
metric penteract, the visible automorphisms of X may be described quite easily.
Because of the symmetry in this case, all the automorphisms of the form
αkl,m on Xi jkl act in similar ways. As always, each αkl,m is an involution of
the K3 surface Xi jkl switching the kth and lth coordinates, e.g., α34,5 sends
(a, b, c, d) ∈ X1234 to (a, b, d, c). Thus, these generate a group of automorphisms
isomorphic to S 4. Note that the automorphism Φi jklm introduced in §7.4 is an
order 4 element, as the composition of three of these transpositions.
While Φi jklm is fixed-point-free for the general X in this family (see §17.2 or
simply observe that the diagonal P1 in (P1)4 does not generally intersect X), note
that its square is an involution but not fixed-point-free (over F ). For example,
the P1 × P1 of points (a, b, a, b) ∈ (P1)4 on X1234 will be fixed under Φ2
i jklm; in
particular, for the general X in this family, there will be 8 fixed points over F ,
namely the intersection of X with this diagonal P1 × P1 in (P1 × P1) × (P1 × P1).
14. 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ 4
In this section, we study the space of 2 × 2 × 2 × 4 matrices and classify their
orbits in terms of certain K3 surfaces of rank at least 13 over F :
Theorem 14.1. Let V = V1 ⊗ V2 ⊗ V3 ⊗ U, where V1, V2, and V3 are 2-
dimensional F-vector spaces and U is a 4-dimensional F-vector space. Let
G′ = GL(V1) × GL(V2) × GL(V3) × GL(U), and let G be the quotient of G′
by the kernel of the multiplication map G4
m → Gm. Let Λ be the lattice whose
Gram matrix is
4
4
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
2
2
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
2
0
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
4
0
2
0
2
1
0
1
1 −2
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
−2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
−2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
−2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
−2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
−2
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
−2
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
−2
0
and let S = {e1, e2, e3, e4}. Then the G(F)-orbits of an open subset of V(F) are
in bijection with the F-rational points of an open subvariety of the moduli space
MΛ,S of K3 surfaces X lattice-polarized by (Λ, S ).
,
(33)
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
−2
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
65
14.1. Construction of K3 surfaces. Given an element A ∈ V(K), we construct
a K3 surface X with Picard number at least 13 as follows. We will show that the
intersection of the varieties defined by the equations
A(v1, v2, · , u) ≡ 0
A(v1, · , v3, u) ≡ 0
A( · , v2, v3, u) ≡ 0
(34)
(35)
(36)
in P(V∨1 ) × P(V∨2 ) × P(V∨3 ) × P(U∨) is a K3 surface X. The projection XU of X
to P(U∨) is then a quartic surface with 12 singularities over F (to be described
below).
The projection X123 of X to P(V∨1 ) × P(V∨2 ) × P(V∨3 ) is cut out by a single
tridegree (2, 2, 2) form f (v1, v2, v3). In order to explicitly describe this form, let
us write A as a quadruple (A1, A2, A3, A4) of trilinear forms on V∨1 × V∨2 × V∨3 (by
choosing a basis for U), and consider the determinant
D(v1, v′1, v2, v′2, v3, v′3) :=
(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)
A1(v1, v2, v3) A2(v1, v2, v3) A3(v1, v2, v3) A4(v1, v2, v3)
A1(v′1, v2, v3) A2(v′1, v2, v3) A3(v′1, v2, v3) A4(v′1, v2, v3)
A1(v1, v′2, v3) A2(v1, v′2, v3) A3(v1, v′2, v3) A4(v1, v′2, v3)
A1(v1, v2, v′3) A2(v1, v2, v′3) A3(v1, v2, v′3) A4(v1, v2, v′3)
(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(37)
for vectors v1, v ′1 ∈ V∨1 , v2, v ′2 ∈ V∨2 , v3, v ′3 ∈ V∨3 . Then we observe that
if (v1, v2, v3, v4) ∈ V∨1 × V∨2 × V∨3 × U satisfies equations (34)–(36), then
u ∈ U∨ lies in the (right) kernel of the matrix in (37). Furthermore, since
the determinant D vanishes if v1 = cv ′1, v2 = cv ′2, or v3 = cv ′3 for any
constant c ∈ K, we see that the polynomial D(v1, v ′1, v2, v ′2, v3, v ′3) is a multiple
of det(v1, v ′1) det(v2, v ′2) det(v3, v ′3). The tridegree (2, 2, 2) form
f (v1, v2, v3) :=
D(v1, v ′1, v2, v ′2, v3, v ′3)
det(v1, v ′1) det(v2, v ′2) det(v3, v ′3)
(38)
is then easily checked to be irreducble and thus defines the projection X123 of X
onto P(V∨1 ) × P(V∨2 ) × P(V∨3 ).
One checks that generically X123 is smooth, and thus X and X123 are iso-
morphic. Moreover, for {i, j, k} = {1, 2, 3}, we have that X123 is a double cover
of P(V∨i ) × P(V j)∨ branched over a genus 9 curve, given by a bidegree (4, 4)
equation (namely, the discriminant of f viewed as a quadratic form on P(V∨k )).
Let XU be the image of X under the fourth projection to P(U∨). Then u ∈ XU
if and only if there exists (v1, v2, v3) ∈ P(V∨1 ) × P(V∨2 ) × P(V∨3 ) such that the
equations (34)–(36) are satisfied, which occurs if and only if the 2 × 2 × 2 cube
A( · , · , · , u) = A(u) has discriminant 0.
(Recall that 2 × 2 × 2 cubes have a
single SL2 × SL2 × SL2-invariant of degree four called the discriminant, which
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
66
is the discriminant of each of the three binary quadratics that arise from the
determinant construction on the cube. If this discriminant vanishes, the cube is
called singular, and in this case, all three of the binary quadratics are multiples
of squares of linear forms, i.e., have double roots in P1.) We conclude that XU is
given by the vanishing of the quartic polynomial disc A(u).
We may also give the following alternative description of XU. Let Y12, Y13,
and Y23 denote the threefolds in P(V∨1 )× P(V∨2 )× P(U∨), P(V∨1 )× P(V∨3 )× P(U∨),
and P(V∨2 ) × P(V∨3 ) × P(U∨) defined by (34), (35), and (36), respectively. Then
for (i, j) ∈ {(1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 3)}, we have that XU is the ramification locus of
the double cover Yi j → P(U∨) given by projection. To see this, fix u ∈ U∨;
then A(v1, v2, · , u) = 0 has generically two solutions (v1, v2) ∈ P(V∨1 ) × P(V∨2 ),
for there are generically two choices for v1 as the root of the associated binary
quadratic on V∨1 , and then a uniquely determined choice for v2 given v1 (namely,
v2 is the left kernel of the bilinear form A(v1, · , · , u)). If this binary quadratic
form on V∨1 has only one root (which occurs when disc A(u) = 0), then there
will thus be only one (v1, v2) giving A(v1, v2, · , u). Hence XU is the ramification
locus of the double cover Y12 → P(U∨), and similarly is the ramification locus of
the double covers Y13 → P(U∨) and Y23 → P(U∨). It follows, in particular, that
the preimage Xi jU of XU in Yi j is the projection of X onto P(V∨i )× P(V∨j )× P(U∨)
and is isomorphic to XU.
14.2. Singularities and exceptional divisors. We claim that XU generically
has 12 singularities; these are closely related to certain special sets S i of four
points in each P(V∨i ). To construct this set S 1 of four points in P(V∨1 ), we
consider the 2 × 2 × 4 box A(v1, · , · , · ) = A(v1) attached to a given point
v1 ∈ P(V∨1 ). It has a natural SL(V2) × SL(V3) × SL(U)-invariant-in fact, an
SL(V2 ⊗ V3)× SL(U)-invariant-of degree four, namely the determinant of A(v1)
when viewed as an element of (V2 ⊗ V3) ⊗ U. That is, with a choice of basis, this
is simply the determinant of A(v1) viewed as a 4 × 4 matrix. This invariant gives
a degree 4 form on P(V∨1 ), which then cuts out our set S 1 of four points in P(V∨1 )
over F . The sets S i for i = 2, 3 are constructed in the analogous manner.
The sets S i have a further significance. Consider the projection π1 : X123 →
P(V∨1 ). The fiber over any point v1 ∈ V∨1 is then the curve in P1(V∨2 ) × P1(V∨3 )
defined by the bidegree (2, 2)-form f (v1, · , · ). We thus see that X123 (cid:27) X is
a genus one fibration over P(V∨1 ), where each genus one fiber is described as a
bidegree (2, 2) curve in P1(V∨2 ) × P1(V∨3 ). A fiber in this fibration is singular
precisely when the discriminant of this bidegree (2, 2) form, which is a binary
form of degree 24 on P1(V∨1 ), is zero. Using indeterminate entries for A, one
checks that this degree 24 binary form factors as the square of a binary quartic
form times an irreducible binary form of degree 16. Thus, generically, we have
16 nodal fibers, while the remaining four fibers turn out to be banana curves,
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
67
i.e., they have as components two rational curves intersecting in two points, as
we now show.
: X → P(V∨1 ) are banana curves.
In fact, we claim that S 1 gives precisely the set of four points over which
the fibers for the map π1
Indeed, for
v1 ∈ S 1, by construction there exists a (generically unique) point u ∈ P(U∨)
such that A(v1, · , · , u) ≡ 0. Then the points (v2, v3) ∈ P(V∨2 ) × P(V∨3 ) such that
(v1, v2, v3, u) ∈ X are cut out by the single equation A( · , v2, v3, u) ≡ 0, which is
a bidegree (1, 1)-form on P(V∨2 ) × P(V∨3 ). It follows that the bidegree (2, 2)-form
that defines the fiber of π1 over v1 factors into two (1, 1) forms, as claimed.
Let E j for 1 ≤ j ≤ 12 denote these twelve rational (1, 1) curves on X as
constructed in the previous paragraph (1 ≤ j ≤ 4 for i = 1, 5 ≤ j ≤ 8 for i = 2,
and 9 ≤ j ≤ 12 for i = 3). Recall that each of these E j must intersect the other
rational curve in its fiber in two points. To obtain the other component, we note
that for r ∈ S 1, the space of 2 × 2 matrices spanned by Ai(r, · , · ), i = 1, . . . , 4
is (generically) three-dimensional, by the definition of S 1. So there is a plane
conic which describes the linear combinations which are of rank 1. With choices
of bases for the vector spaces Vi and their duals, suppose such a rank 1 matrix
is Zs,t = ( s2t2 −s2t1
s1t1 ); then (s1, s2) ∈ V∨2 and (t1, t2) ∈ V∨3 give a point (r, s, t) on
the fiber over r (the U component may be computed uniquely, and is the linear
combination above). The locus of these (s, t) ∈ P(V∨2 ) × P(V∨3 ) is given by a
determinantal condition which says that Zs,t is linearly dependent with the Ai,
hence a (1, 1)-form.
−s1t2
As we have already noted, the projection X → X123 is an isomorphism. The
map X → XU is, not, however: the 12 rational curves E j are blown down to
12 singularities (recall that, for each j, the elements of E j all have the same
U-coordinate u). Meanwhile, the other rational curves map to nodal curves.
14.3. N´eron-Severi lattice. We thus have a number of divisors on XF :
the
E j for j = 1, . . . , 12, as well as H (the pullback of OP(U∨)(1)) and the Li (the
pullbacks of OP(V∨i )(1)) for i = 1, 2, 3. We now compute their intersection
numbers.
First, note that L1 · L2 = 2 since X ֒→ P(V∨1 ) × P(V∨2 ) × P(V∨3 ) is cut out
by a (2, 2, 2)-form.
Intersecting X with the zero loci of (1, 0, 0) and (0, 1, 0)
forms, we get an intersection number of 2, corresponding to the fact that
X → P(V∨1 ) × P(V∨2 ) is a double cover. By symmetry, Li · L j = 2 for all i , j.
Next, we show that Li · H = 4. The geometric meaning of the intersection
number L3 · H is as follows. We fix a point (r1, r2) ∈ P(V∨3 ), i.e. take a fixed
(generic) linear combination of the front and back faces of our 2 × 2 × 2 cube
of linear forms, yielding a 2 × 2 matrix of linear forms. Intersection with H
means that we restrict the forms to a generic hyperplane in P(U∨). We look for
the number of points in this plane for which the matrix is singular, and such
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
68
that (r1, r2) is the unique linear combination of the faces which is singular. For
simplicity, assume that (1, 0) is not one of the four special points in P(V∨3 ) over
which X has a reducible fiber. Then, due to the GL(V3) action, we may compute
the intersection number when (r1, r2) is (1, 0). The constraint that the front face
a b
c d !
of our cube is singular describes a conic in the plane V(H) ⊂ P(U∨). On the other
hand, for (1, 0) to be the unique linear combination of the faces which makes the
matrix singular, if
f
e
g h !
denotes the back face of our cube, then we also need the mixed determinant
to vanish, and this also describes a plane conic. Generically, these two conics
intersect in four points, proving our assertion.
ah + ed − f c − bg,
The nonzero intersections among the divisors H, L1, . . . , L3, E1, . . . , E12 are
given by
H2 = H · Li = 4,
H · Ei = 0,
Li · L j = 2,
L1 · Ei = 1 for i ∈ {5, . . . , 12},
L2 · Ei = 1 for i ∈ {1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 11, 12},
L3 · Ei = 1 for i ∈ {1, . . . , 8}.
Next, we determine the N´eron-Severi group of the generic K3 surface in this
family.
Proposition 14.2. For a generic X in this family of K3 surfaces, NS(X) is
spanned over Z by H, E1, . . . , E12 and L1, L2, L3.
Proof. We have already demonstrated that NS(X) contains H, E1, . . . , E12, with
H2 = 4 , H · Ei = 0 and Ei · E j = −2δi j. Therefore the rank is at least 13. On the
other hand, the moduli space has dimension 2 · 2 · 2 · 4 − (22 − 1) · 3 − 42 = 7.
Hence the dimension of NS(X) for generic X must be exactly 13.
Since Li · H = 4 and Li · E j = 0 if j ∈ {4i − 3, 4i − 2, 4i − 1, 4i}, by comparing
intersection numbers, we obtain
L1 = H − (E5 + . . . E12)/2,
L2 = H − (E1 + · · · + E4 + E9 + · · · + E12)/2,
L3 = H − (E1 + · · · + E8)/2.
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
69
Note that L1 + L2 + L3 is already in ZH + ZE1 + · · · + ZE12.
The discriminant of the lattice M spanned by H, the three Li, and the twelve
E j is 4·212/24 = 210 = 1024. Since this discriminant is a power of 2, if the N´eron-
Severi lattice is larger than M, there exists an element D ∈ QH + QE1 + . . . QE12
where all the denominators are powers of 2.
In that case, we claim that 2D ∈ ZH + . . . ZE12. Let 2e be the largest power
of 2 in a denominator of a coefficient of Ei in D. If e ≥ 2, then 2e−2D· Ei is not an
integer, since E2
i = −2. Also, we cannot have D = mH/2e + (c1E1 + . . . c12E12)/2
with ci integers, e ≥ 2 and m odd, for then 2e−1D = mH/2+2e−2(c1E1+. . . c12E12)
is in NS(X), and so is mH/2. But this is impossible, since (mH/2)2 = m2
is odd while the intersection pairing is even. Without loss of generality (by
subtracting integer multiples of H and Ei), we may thus assume that D =
(c1E1 + · · · + c12E12)/2 or D = (H + c1E1 + · · · + c12E12)/2, where ci ∈ {0, 1}.
In the first case, we note thatP ci ∈ {0, 8, 16} by Lemma 2.3. NowP ci = 16
is impossible, while P ci = 0 is trivial. Therefore, we need to show that if
P ci = 8, then D is one of H − Li. If not, then D · L3 ∈ Z shows that c1 + · · · + c8
is even. It must be at least 4 (otherwise P ci = (c1 + · · · + c8) + c9 + · · · + c12
would be less than 8) and cannot be 8 (otherwise D = H − L3). Finally, it cannot
be 6 (otherwise, subtracting H − L3 would lead to a divisor y = (P diEi)/2 with
di ∈ {0, 1} andP di = 4, which is impossible). We conclude that c1 +· · · +c8 = 4.
Similarly c1 + · · · + c4 + c5 + · · · c12 = 4 and c5 + · · · + c12 = 4. Adding yields
P ci = 6, which is a contradiction.
An easy discriminant calculation shows:
Corollary 14.3. For a generic X in this family of K3 surfacs, NS(X) has a basis
given by H, L1, L2, L3, E1, E2, E3, E5, E6, E7, E9, E10, and E11.
14.4. Reverse map. Starting from the data of a K3 surface X with line bundles
L1, L2, L3 and H coming from a 2 × 2 × 2 × 4 box A, we show how to recover the
box. Consider the map
H0(L1) ⊗ H0(L2) ⊗ H0(H) → H0(L1 ⊗ L2 ⊗ H).
(39)
The dimension of the domain is 2 · 2 · 4 = 16. The dimension of the image can
be computed by the Riemann-Roch formula, after noting that
(L1 + L2 + H)2 = 0 + 0 + 4 + 2 · 2 + 2 · 4 + 2 · 4 = 24.
Since L1 + L2 + H is the class of a big and nef divisor, an easy application of
Riemann-Roch on the K3 surface X yields
H0(L1 + L2 + H) =
1
2
(L1 + L2 + H)2 + χ(OX) =
24
2
+ 2 = 14.
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
70
Therefore the kernel (which we will soon identify with V∨3 ) of (39) has dimension
2, and we obtain a 2 × 2 × 2 × 4 box B ∈ V1 ⊗ V2 ⊗ V3 ⊗ U, where V1 = H0(L1),
V2 = H0(L2), and U = H0(H).
Let X(B) ∈ P(V∨1 )× P(V∨2 )× P(V∨3 )× P(U∨) denote the K3 surface associated
to B. To see that B is in fact the desired box A (once V∨3 is correctly identified
with the kernel of (39)), it suffices to show that X(B)12U is in fact equal to X12U as
sets in P(V∨1 ) × P(V∨2 ) × P(U∨). It is equivalent to show that the threefold Y(B)12
associated to B is the same as the threefold Y12 in P(V∨1 ) × P(V∨2 ) × P(U∨), since
X(B)12U (and X12U) is then recovered as the ramification locus of Y(B)12 = Y12 →
P(U∨). (In other words, if two 2 × 2 × 2 × 4 boxes yield the same threefold, then
they must be the same box!) Now the equality Y12 ⊂ Y(B)12 is true by the very
construction of B, yielding X12U ⊂ X(B)12U. Then XU ⊂ X(B)U, but since both
are defined by quartics, we have XU = X(B)U, and then X12U = X(B)12U and also
Y12 ⊂ Y(B)12, as desired.
We have proved Theorem 14.1.
15. 2 ⊗ 2 ⊗ Sym2(4)
In this section, we study the orbits of V1 ⊗V2 ⊗Sym2V3, where V1, V2, and V3
are F-vector spaces of dimensions 2, 2, and 4, respectively. We show that these
orbits correspond to K3 surfaces lattice-polarized by a rank 2 lattice:
Theorem 15.1. Let V1, V2, and V3 be F-vector spaces of dimensions 2, 2, and 4,
respectively. Let G′ = GL(V1)×GL(V2)×GL(V3), and let G be the quotient of G′
by the kernel of the multiplication map Gm × Gm × Gm → Gm sending (γ1, γ2, γ3)
to γ1γ2γ2
3. Let Λ be the lattice whose Gram matrix is
0 4
4 4!
(40)
and let S = {e1, e2}. Then the G(F)-orbits of an open subset of V(F) are in
bijection with the F-rational points of an open subvariety of the moduli space
MΛ,S of K3 surfaces X lattice-polarized by (Λ, S ).
15.1. Construction of K3 surfaces. From a general element A ∈ V1 ⊗ V2 ⊗
Sym2(V3), we obtain several natural surfaces. We view A as a tridegree (1, 1, 2)
form, denoted by A( · , · , · ), on V∨1 × V∨2 × V∨3 . First, define the quartic surface
X3 := {z ∈ P(V∨3 ) : det A( · , · , z) = 0}.
If X3 is nonsingular or has only
rational double point singularities, then X3 is a K3 surface. We call such A
nondegenerate, and we will only consider such A. Now let
X13 := {(x, z) ∈ P(V∨1 ) × P(V∨3 ) : A(x, · , z) = 0}
X23 := {(y, z) ∈ P(V∨2 ) × P(V∨3 ) : A( · , y, z) = 0}.
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
71
These are each cut out by two bidegree (1, 2) forms in P1 × P3. Note that there
are natural projections Xi3 → X3 for i = 1 or 2, and any isolated singularities on
X3 will be blown up by these maps. Finally, we let
X123 := {(x, y, z) ∈ P(V∨1 ) × P(V∨2 ) × P(V∨3 ) : A(x, · , z) = A( · , y, z) = 0}.
The surface X123 projects to Xi3 for i = 1 or 2, and we see that all of these surfaces
are birational.
The projection of X123 to P(V∨1 ) × P(V∨2 ) has degree 8. For any point
(x, y) ∈ P(V∨1 )×P(V∨2 ), the preimage in X123 is the intersection of a P2 of quadrics
in P(V∨3 ).
For {i, j} = {1, 2}, another way to construct Xi3 is to view a general element of
V j⊗Sym2(V3) as giving a genus one curve of degree 4 in P(V∨3 ), namely the base
locus of the pencil of quadrics in P(V∨3 ). Then an element v of Vi⊗V j⊗Sym2(V3)
gives a pencil over P(V∨i ) of genus one curves, and the discriminant has degree
24 and is irreducible. This gives Xi3 as a genus one fibration over P(V∨i ) with
generically only nodal reducible fibers.
Although it will not be directly relevant to the moduli problem, yet another
K3 surface Y may be obtained by viewing v as a symmetric matrix of bilinear
forms on V∨1 ×V∨2 . The determinant of this matrix is thus a bidegree (4, 4) curve in
P(V∨1 ) × P(V∨2 ), and the double cover of P(V∨1 ) × P(V∨2 ) ramified at this bidegree
(4, 4) curve is a K3 surface. It is also a genus one fibration over both P(V∨1 )
and over P(V∨2 ). Indeed, as a fibration over P(V∨i ), the smooth irreducible fibers
are genus one curves of degree 2 (namely, double covers of P(V∨j ) ramified at a
degree 4 subscheme of P(V∨j )).
15.2. N´eron-Severi lattice. The K3 surface X123 corresponding to a very gen-
eral point in the moduli space has rank 2, since it is a genus one fibration without
any extra divisors. The N´eron-Severi lattice is spanned by L1, L2 and L3 (the
pullback of hyperplane divisors from P(V∨1 ), P(V∨2 ) and P(V∨3 )) which have the
intersection numbers L2
3 = 4.
It is easily seen that 2L3 = L1 + L2, so the lattice spanned by their classes in the
N´eron-Severi group has a basis {L1, L3}, with intersection matrix
i = 0 and Li· L3 = 4 for i = 1 or 2, L1· L2 = 8, and L2
0 4
4 4 ! .
In fact, it must be the entire N´eron-Severi lattice. To prove this, it suffices to
show that the three classes L1/2, L3/2 and (L1 + L3)/2 do not arise from divisors
on the surface. The first assertion is immediate, since L1 is the class of an elliptic
fiber, and therefore not multiple. The other two Q-divisor classes have odd self-
intersection, so they cannot come from divisors, either.
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
72
15.3. Moduli problem. To prove Theorem 15.1, we need to construct an
element of V1 ⊗ V2 ⊗ Sym2(V3) from a K3 surface X with divisors L1 and L3
that have intersection matrix (40).
Proof of Theorem 15.1. First, the natural multiplication map Sym2H0(X, L3) →
H0(X, 2L3) is an isomorphism by a dimension count (each has dimension 10).
We consider the multiplication map
µ : H0(X, L1) ⊗ Sym2H0(X, L3) (cid:27)
→ H0(X, L1) ⊗ H0(X, 2L3) → H0(X, L1 + 2L3).
(41)
The dimension of the domain is 20, and h0(X, L1 +2L3) = 1
2(L1 +2L3)2 +χ(OX) =
16 + 2 = 18. We claim that (41) is surjective, in which case the kernel is 2-
dimensional and will give the desired tensor.
The surjectivity of µ follows directly from the basepoint-free pencil trick
1 ⊗ L⊗2
and the fact that H1(X, L−1
3 ) is 0. This last vanishing may be obtained
1 ⊗ L⊗2
1 ⊗ L⊗2
by computing χ(L−1
3 ) = 2, h0(X, L−1
3 ) = 2 (because the bundle is
1 ⊗ L⊗2
nef and semiample), and h2(X, L−1
3 ) = 0 by Serre duality. Note that the
basepoint-free pencil trick also gives an isomorphism of the kernel of µ with
H0(X, L−1
The usual argument (e.g., see the proofs of Theorems 4.1 and 7.1) shows that
1 ⊗ L⊗2
3 ).
these two constructions are inverse to one another.
16. Sym2(2) ⊗ Sym2(4)
Finally, just as in the Rubik's revenge and penteract cases, we may consider a
symmetric linear subspace of the previous case of 2⊗2⊗Sym2(4). Specifically, let
V = Sym2(V1) ⊗ Sym2(V2), where V1 and V2 are F-vector spaces of dimensions
2 and 4, respectively. Then the general orbits of V under linear transformations
on V1 and V2 correspond to certain K3 surfaces of rank at least 9 over F :
Theorem 16.1. Let V1 and V2 be F-vector spaces of dimensions 2 and 4,
respectively. Let G′ = Gm × GL(V1) × GL(V2) and let G be its quotient by
the kernel of the multiplication map Gm × Gm × Gm → Gm sending (γ1, γ2, γ3)
to γ1γ2
2γ2
3. Let Λ be the lattice whose Gram matrix is
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
−2
0
4
1
4
0
0 −2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
−2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
−2
0
0
0
1
0
0
−2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
−2
0
0
0
0
0
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
−2
(42)
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
73
and let S = {e1, e2}. Then the G(F)-orbits of an open subset of V(F) are in
bijection with the F-rational points of an open subvariety of the moduli space
MΛ,S of K3 surfaces X lattice-polarized by (Λ, S ).
We view this vector space as a subspace of V1 ⊗ V1 ⊗ Sym2(V2). Then the K3
surfaces in this case are constructed in the same way as in §15. However, for a
general element A ∈ Sym2(V1) ⊗ Sym2(V2), we obtain eight rank singularities
(over F ) on the surface X3 ⊂ P(V∨2 ); they are exactly the points where the
symmetric 2 × 2 matrix of quadratic forms A( · , · , z) is identically zero, namely
the intersection of three quadrics in P3. These singularities are blown up in the
other surfaces X12, X13, and X123 described in §15, all of which are isomorphic
nonsingular K3 surfaces for the general A. Let Ei for 1 ≤ i ≤ 8 denote these
exceptional divisors on X := X123.
The symmetry also shows that the line bundles L1 and L2, defined as pull-
backs of OP(V∨1 )(1) to X, are the same. We thus have the relation
2L3 = 2L1 +Xi
Ei
(43)
where L3 is the pullback of OP(V∨2 )(1) to X. Computing the intersection numbers
of L1, L3, and the Ei in the usual way gives the intersection matrix (42) (with
respect to the basis L1, L3, E1, . . . , E7). The lattice spanned by these divisors has
rank 9 and discriminant 256. To check that it is all of NS(X), we observe by
direct calculation that any element of the dual lattice has the form
D =
cL3
4
+
1
2
7
Xi=1
diEi.
First, observe that c cannot be odd; otherwise, 2D and hence cL3/2 would be in
NS(X), which is impossible since it has odd self-intersection. We can therefore
write
D =
cL3
2
+
1
2
diEi.
7
Xi=1
Then by symmetry,
D′ =
cL3
2
+
1
2
6
Xi=1
diEi + d7E8
is also in NS(X). Subtracting, we get d7(E7−E8)/2 ∈ NS(X), which is impossible
by Lemma 2.3, unless d7 is even. Similarly, all the di are even, resulting in
D = cL3/2, which is impossible by the argument above.
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
74
To complete the proof of Theorem 16.1, we check that a K3 surface X whose
N´eron-Severi lattice contains the lattice (42) may be obtained from an element
of our vector space V. The construction in the proof of Theorem 15.1 applies
here, and we only need to check that the resulting element A is symmetric in
the two 2-dimensional vector spaces. This is by the same argument as in the
symmetric penteract cases: by Theorem 15.1, the tridegree (1, 1, 2) form A in
U1 ⊗ U2 ⊗ Sym2(U3) gives a K3 surface whose two projections to P(U∨1 ) and
P(U∨2 ) are identical (under some identification φ : U2 → U1). Therefore, if A is
viewed as a 2× 2 matrix B = (bi j) of quadratic forms on the 4-dimensional space
U3, we must have that b12 = b21 identically, or in other words, the image of A
under Id ⊗ φ ⊗ Id is an element of Sym2(U1) ⊗ Sym2(U3).
17. Applications and connections
In this section, we prove Theorems 1.5 and 1.6, as well as several related
results, by using hyperdeterminants and the automorphisms of the K3 surfaces
discussed in earlier sections.
17.1. Definition of hyperdeterminant. The hyperdeterminant of a multidi-
mensional matrix is a natural analogue of the determinant of a square matrix.
It was first introduced by Cayley [24, pp. 80–94], while a detailed study was
carried out in the important work of Gelfand, Kapranov, and Zelevinsky [35].
We may define the hyperdeterminant as follows (see [35] for more details).
Let F be a field, and let T : V1⊗· · ·⊗Vr → F be a linear map, where V1, . . . , Vr are
F-vector spaces having dimensions k1 + 1, . . . , kr + 1, respectively. By choosing
bases for V1, . . . , Vr, we may view T as a (k1 + 1) × · · · × (kr + 1) matrix. The
kernel ker(T ) of T is defined to be
{v = v1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ vr ∈ V1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ Vr : T (v1, . . . , vi−1, ·, vi+1, . . . , vr) = 0 for all i}.
By definition, a hyperdeterminant det(T ) of the multidimensional matrix T is a
polynomial of minimal degree in the entries of T whose vanishing is equivalent
to T having a nontrivial kernel. If it exists, the hyperdeterminant is then well-
defined up to a scalar multiple.
The necessary conditions on the dimensions of the matrix T for the exis-
tence of hyperdeterminants was determined by Gelfand, Kapranov, and Zelevin-
sky [35, Ch. 14]:
Theorem 17.1 ([35]). Assume without loss of generality that kr ≥ k1, . . . , kr−1.
Then hyperdeterminants exist for (k1 + 1) × · · · × (kr + 1) matrices if and only if
kr ≤ k1 + · · · + kr−1.
For example, when r = 2, hyperdeterminants exist if and only if k1 = k2, i.e.,
the matrix is square. By definition, we see that a square matrix T has vanishing
hyperdeterminant if and only if T has a nontrivial left (equivalently, right) kernel.
Thus the hyperdeterminant in this case coincides with the usual determinant.
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
75
17.2. Interpretations in terms of fixed-point-free automorphisms. Although
interpretations of the determinant of a square matrix (e.g., as a volume) have
been known for centuries, interpretations for the hyperdeterminant for higher
dimensional matrices have been less forthcoming.
In [8], an interpretation of the hyperdeterminant in the case of a 2 × 2 × 2
matrix was given, namely, as the discriminant of an associated quadratic algebra.
Analogous interpretations for the hyperdeterminant of a 2 × 3 × 3 matrix-
namely, as the discriminant of an associated cubic algebra-were given in
[9].
In the works [4, 16, 14], orbits on multidimensional matrices of various
dimensions were shown to be in bijection with certain data involving algebraic
curves, and in these cases the hyperdeterminants are equal to the discriminants
of the corresponding curves. Thus the nonvanishing of the hyperdeterminant in
these cases corresponds to the nondegeneracy of the associated rings and the
nonsingularity of the associated curves, respectively.
For the orbit parametrizations of K3 surfaces by multidimensional matrices
that we have studied in this paper, we find that the hyperdeterminant does not
coincide with the discriminant, but only divides it. This raises the question as to
the interpretation of the hyperdeterminant in these cases. In the cases of 4× 4× 4
and 2× 2× 2× 2× 2 matrices, we showed that the generic orbits of such matrices
correspond to K3 surfaces with at most isolated double point singularities that are
(Λ, S )-polarized for some pair (Λ, S ). Moreover, these K3 surfaces are naturally
equipped with birational automorphisms Φ, which lift to automorphisms of the
nonsingular models; these birational automorphisms are in fact automorphisms
whenever the associated K3 surfaces have no rank singularities.
The interpretation of the hyperdeterminant locus that we obtain in this case
is then as follows:
Theorem 17.2. Let T be a 4 × 4 × 4 matrix, and suppose that the associated
K3 surfaces X1, X2, X3 via Theorem 4.1 have no rank singularities. Then the
hyperdeterminant of T vanishes if and only if the associated automorphism Φ of
X = X1 has a fixed point.
Proof. Suppose the hyperdeterminant of T vanishes, and let v1⊗ v2⊗ v3 ∈ ker(T ).
For each i ∈ {1, 2, 3}, let ¯vi denote the image of vi in P(Vi). Then ¯vi is a point
on Xi. By the definition of Φ and the fact that there are no rank singularities on
the Xi, we see that ψ12( ¯v1) = ¯v2, ψ( ¯v2) = ¯v3, and ψ( ¯v3) = ¯v1; hence Φ( ¯v1) = ¯v1,
yielding a fixed point of Φ on X1, as desired.
If some of the Xi have isolated rank singularities, then the maps ψi j : Xi 99K
X j are not isomorphisms but birational maps. These maps lift uniquely to
Xi → X j between the nonsingular models Xi and X j of
isomorphisms ψi j
Xi and X j, respectively (see, e.g., [3, Theorem 10.21]). We thus obtain an
automorphism Φ = ψ31 ◦ ψ23 ◦ ψ12 of X = X1. In this case too, we may still
use the hyperdeterminant to detect fixed points of Φ:
:
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
76
Theorem 17.3. Let T be a 4 × 4 × 4 matrix, and suppose that the associated K3
surfaces X1, X2, X3 via Theorem 4.1 have only isolated double point singularities.
If the associated automorphism Φ of the nonsingular model X = X1 of X1 has a
fixed point, then the hyperdeterminant of T vanishes.
Proof. Suppose v1 on X1 is a fixed point of Φ. Let v2 = ψ12( v1) and v3 = ψ23( v2),
so that v1 = ψ31( v3). Let v1, v2, v3 denote the images of v1, v2, v3 in X1, X2, X3,
respectively. We claim that v1 ⊗ v2 ⊗ v3 ∈ ker(T ). Indeed, the nonsingularization
map X1 → X1 factors through
X12 = n(x, y) ∈ P(V∨1 ) × P(V∨2 ) : A(x, y, · ) = 0o .
(In fact, X12 is isomorphic to X1 when X1 only has simple isolated rank singular-
ities.) It follows that T (v1, v2, · ) = 0. Similarly, T ( · , v2, v3) = T (v1, · , v3) = 0.
This is the desired conclusion.
In particular, if the hyperdeterminant is nonzero, then the automorphism Φ of X
has no fixed points.
Similarly, we have:
Theorem 17.4. Let T be a 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 matrix, and suppose that the
associated K3 surfaces Xi jk via Theorem 7.1 have no rank singularities. Then
the hyperdeterminant of T vanishes if and only if one (equivalently, every one)
of the associated automorphisms Φabcde of Xi jk has a fixed point.
Theorem 17.5. Let T be a 2×2×2×2×2 matrix, and suppose that the associated
K3 surfaces Xi jk via Theorem 7.1 have only isolated double point singularities.
If, for any i, j, k, the associated automorphism Φabcde of the nonsingular model
X = Xi jk of Xi jk has a fixed point, then the hyperdeterminant of T vanishes.
The proofs are similar to those of Theorems 17.2 and 17.3.
In §17.3 and §17.4, we use these theorems about hyperdeterminants van-
ishing to exhibit fixed-point-free automorphisms of finite order and of positive
entropy, respectively, for most of the K3 surfaces in some of the families we
consider (namely, those where the hyperdeterminant does not vanish).
17.3. Fixed-point-free automorphisms of finite order. We may use Theorem
17.3 and Theorem 17.5 to find fixed-point-free automorphisms of finite order for
most of the K3 surfaces in some of the symmetric Rubik's revenge and penteract
families.
For the doubly symmetric Rubik's revenge case, the automorphism Φ of a
general member X of the family of K3 surfaces gives an involution of X (as
described in §5.3). When the hyperdeterminant does not vanish, by Theorem
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
77
17.3, this involution is fixed-point-free. Such an involution produces an Enriques
surface, so the moduli space of the K3s in this family also correspond to (an open
part of the) moduli space for certain Enriques surfaces.
Similarly, for the triply symmetric Rubik's revenge, the automorphism Φ is a
fixed-point-free involution for the general Hessian quartic surface; this involution
is studied in [31].
For quadruply and quintuply symmetric penteracts, recall from §12.2 and
§13.2 that the 5-cycles Φi jklm are order 4 automorphisms. By Theorem 17.5,
these automorphisms are fixed-point-free. As discussed in §12.2 and §13.2, the
square of each of these automorphisms is an involution but no longer fixed-point-
free.
Note that we have previously constructed other automorphisms for the pen-
teract (and symmetric penteract) cases with finite order but which are not fixed-
point-free. For example, for the triply symmetric penteracts, the four-cycles
α23,5 ◦ α34,5 : X1234 → X1235 → X1245 → X1345
and α13,5 ◦ α34,5 are order 3. Viewing the K3 surface X1234 as a genus one
fibration over P(V∨1 ) (respectively, P(V∨2 )), the automorphism α23,5 ◦ α34,5 (resp.,
α13,5 ◦ α34,5) is given by translation by a 3-torsion section of the Jacobian
fibration (see [16, §6.3.2]). The reducible fibers of the genus one fibration have
fixed points, however. Similar automorphisms (corresponding to translations
by 3-torsion sections of the Jacobian fibrations) appear for the doubly-triply,
quadruply, and quintuply symmetric penteracts as well.
17.4. Fixed-point-free automorphisms of positive entropy. We show that
many of the automorphisms that we have constructed in earlier sections have
positive entropy and are fixed-point-free for the general member of the corre-
sponding family. Specifically, we obtain such fixed-point-free automorphisms
with positive entropy for the cases from lines 6, 9, 11, 13, 15, and 16 of Table 1.
In each of these cases, by the parametrization theorems in this paper, the
N´eron-Severi lattice of the K3 surfaces X (over F) in the families contain a given
lattice Λ; the N´eron-Severi lattice of the very general member of the family will
be exactly Λ. We will describe the action of a particular automorphism Φ on
X (defined over F); we find that Φ∗ acts on Λ by a matrix M, which has an
eigenvalue λ of norm larger than 1. Since the action of Φ∗ on NS(X) ⊗ R has at
most one eigenvalue of modulus larger than 1 (see [21, §2.3.2]) and M fixes the
subspace Λ ⊗ R in NS(X) ⊗ R, the spectral radius of Φ∗ is exactly λ.
In other words, for each of these cases, we find that the entropy of the
automorphism for each K3 surface is the logarithm of the norm of the largest
eigenvalue λ of M. The theorems from §17.2 imply that these automorphisms
are fixed-point-free for the general member of the family, specifically when the
hyperdeterminant of the corresponding element does not vanish.
−1 0 2
2
−2 1 2
4
−4 2 5
6
−6 2 8 11
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
78
Rubik's revenge. As mentioned in §4.4, for each K3 surface X arising from a
Rubik's revenge, there exists an automorphism Φ whose induced action on (the
known part of) NS(X) is given by the matrix
−3 −8
21! .
8
2
The characteristic polynomial of this matrix is λ2 − 18λ + 1, and the largest
eigenvalue is λRR = 9 + 4 √5. The entropy of the automorphism Φ is thus
6 log 1+ √5
, and by Theorem 17.2, this automorphism is also fixed-point-free if
the hyperdeterminant of the Rubik's revenge does not vanish. This gives the
proof of Theorem 1.5, an extension of Oguiso's result from [61].
Penteracts. Recall from §7.4 that we defined an automorphism Φ51234 (as a
certain 5-cycle along the 1-dimensional boundary of a 5-cell), and Φ51234 induces
the action of the matrix
on (the known part of) NS(X). The characteristic polynomial of this matrix is
λ4 − 16λ3 + 14λ2 − 16λ + 1, and the maximum eigenvalue λpent is approximately
15.1450744834468. Therefore, the entropy of Φ51234 is log λpent ≈ 2.717675362.
The same numerics occur for all of the other 5-cycles, by symmetry.
By Theorem 17.4, the automorphism Φ51234 will be fixed-point-free if the
hyperdeterminant of the penteract does not vanish. Thus, we have produced
a family of K3 surfaces whose general member has several fixed-point-free
automorphisms with positive entropy, giving the proof of Theorem 1.6.
Recall that for the penteract (and the symmetric) cases, one may also consider
automorphisms that are 3- or 4-cycles along the boundary of the 5-cell; these
all have zero entropy. There are also infinitely many other automorphisms (for
instance, by taking arbitrary words in the generators) with positive entropy (see
§7.4). This is also true for the symmetric penteract cases below.
Doubly symmetric penteracts. Recall from §8.3 that the automorphism Φ54321
on a K3 surface X here induces the action of the matrix (18) on (the known part
of) NS(X), which has characteristic polynomial (λ − 1)6(λ + 1)(λ2 − 6λ + 1) and
largest eigenvalue 3 + 2 √2. The entropy of Φ54321 here is thus log (3 + 2 √2) =
2 log ( √2 + 1).
In addition, the entropy of Φ53421 is log λpent, since its action on NS(X) is
similar to the action of the penteract case. The 5-cycles thus have entropy either
2 log ( √2 + 1) or log λpent.
By Theorem 17.5, we thus find that the general member of this family of K3
surfaces has many fixed-point-free automorphisms with positive entropy.
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
79
Triply symmetric penteracts.
In §9.3, for the general member X of the family of
K3 surfaces related to triply symmetric penteracts, we found an automorphism
Φ54123 whose action on (the known part of) NS(X) is given by the matrix (20).
This matrix has characteristic polynomial (λ + 1)2(λ2 − λ + 1)5(λ2 − 3λ + 1) and
largest eigenvalue 3+ √5
As before, some of the other 5-cycles have the same numerics (by symmetry).
The other 5-cycles (like Φ54132) have entropy at least log(3+2 √2), as their action
on N´eron-Severi is much like that of Φ54321 in the doubly symmetric penteract
case.
2 = ( √5+1
)2.
2
2
Thus, applying Theorem 17.5, we have that the general member of this family
) and
of K3 surfaces has fixed-point-free automorphisms with entropy 2 log ( √5+1
2 log ( √2 + 1).
In §10.2, we described a 5-cycle auto-
Doubly-doubly symmetric penteracts.
morphism Φ53214 on the general member of the family of K3 surfaces arising
from doubly doubly symmetric penteracts.
Its action on (the known part of)
NS(X) is given by (24), with characteristic polynomial (λ+1)12(λ2+1)(λ2−4λ+1)
and largest eigenvalue 2 + √3.
Therefore, Theorem 17.5 implies that the general member of this family of
K3 surfaces has a fixed-point-free automorphism with entropy log (2 + √3). In
addition, from the automorphisms Φ53421 and Φ53241 (and other analogous 5-
cycles), we also obtain fixed-point-free automorphisms with entropy equal to
log λpent and 2 log ( √2 + 1), respectively.
Doubly-triply symmetric penteracts. The automorphism Φ53214 from §11.2,
applied to the general member X of the family of K3 surfaces coming from
doubly triply symmetric penteracts, acts on (the known part of) NS(X) by (29).
It has characteristic polynomial (λ − 1)3(λ + 1)(λ2 − 3λ + 1)(λ2 + λ + 1)8
and largest eigenvalue 3+ √5
(just as in the triply symmetric penteract case).
The same argument shows that this gives fixed-point-free automorphisms with
entropy 2 log ( √5+1
). Moreover, the automorphism Φ52413 is fixed-point-free
with entropy 2 log ( √2 + 1).
Acknowledgements. We thank Noam Elkies, Dick Gross, Curt McMullen,
Bjorn Poonen, Igor Rivin, Peter Sarnak, and Ichiro Shimada for many helpful
conversations. We are very grateful to Serge Cantat and Genya Zaytman for
careful readings of earlier drafts and many useful comments. We also thank
Arthur Baragar, Igor Dolgachev, and Brendan Hassett for feedback on earlier
drafts. Finally, we are very thankful to the anonymous referees for careful
readings of the paper, and for many insightful remarks and detailed references
that improved it. MB was supported by a Simons Investigator Grant and NSF
2
2
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
80
grant DMS-1001828. WH was supported by NSF grant DMS-1406066. AK was
supported in part by National Science Foundation grant DMS-0952486 and by a
grant from the MIT Solomon Buchsbaum Research Fund.
References
[1] G´eom´etrie des surfaces K3: modules et p´eriodes, Soci´et´e Math´ematique de France, Paris,
1985, Papers from the seminar held in Palaiseau, October 1981–January 1982, Ast´erisque
No. 126 (1985).
[2] E. Arbarello, M. Cornalba, P. A. Griffiths, and J. Harris, Geometry of algebraic curves. Vol.
I, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathe-
matical Sciences], vol. 267, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985.
[3] Lucian Badescu, Algebraic surfaces, Universitext, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001,
Translated from the 1981 Romanian original by Vladimir Mas¸ek and revised by the author.
[4] Arnaud Beauville, Determinantal hypersurfaces, Michigan Math. J. 48 (2000), 39–64,
Dedicated to William Fulton on the occasion of his 60th birthday.
[5]
, Fano threefolds and K3 surfaces, The Fano Conference, Univ. Torino, Turin,
2004, pp. 175–184.
[6] Nicolas Bergeron, Zhiyuan Li, John Millson, and Colette Moeglin, The Noether-Lefschetz
conjecture and generalizations, preprint (2014), http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.3774.
[7] Manjul Bhargava, Higher composition laws. I. A new view on Gauss composition, and
quadratic generalizations, Ann. of Math. (2) 159 (2004), no. 1, 217–250.
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
, Higher composition laws. II. On cubic analogues of Gauss composition, Ann. of
Math. (2) 159 (2004), no. 2, 865–886.
, Higher composition laws. III. The parametrization of quartic rings, Ann. of Math.
(2) 159 (2004), no. 3, 1329–1360.
, The density of discriminants of quartic rings and fields, Ann. of Math. (2) 162
(2005), no. 2, 1031–1063.
, Higher composition laws. IV. The parametrization of quintic rings, Ann. of Math.
(2) 167 (2008), no. 1, 53–94.
, The density of discriminants of quintic rings and fields, Ann. of Math. (2) 172
(2010), no. 3, 1559–1591.
[13] Manjul Bhargava, Most hyperelliptic curves over Q have no rational points, preprint
(2013), http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.0395.
[14] Manjul Bhargava, Benedict Gross,
and the arithmetic of hyperelliptic curves,
http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.7692.
and Xiaoheng Wang, Pencils of quadrics
(to appear),
J. Amer. Math. Soc.
[15] Manjul Bhargava and Benedict H. Gross, The average size of the 2-Selmer group of Jaco-
bians of hyperelliptic curves having a rational Weierstrass point, Automorphic representa-
tions and L-functions, Tata Inst. Fundam. Res. Stud. Math., vol. 22, Tata Inst. Fund. Res.,
Mumbai, 2013, pp. 23–91.
[16] Manjul Bhargava and Wei Ho, Coregular spaces and genus one curves, Cambridge J. Math.
4 (2016), no. 1, 1–119.
[17] Manjul Bhargava and Arul Shankar, Binary quartic forms having bounded invariants, and
the boundedness of the average rank of elliptic curves, Ann. of Math. (2) 181 (2015), no. 1,
191–242.
[18]
, Ternary cubic forms having bounded invariants, and the existence of a positive
proportion of elliptic curves having rank 0, Ann. of Math. (2) 181 (2015), no. 2, 587–621.
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
81
[19] Manjul Bhargava, Arul Shankar, and Jacob Tsimerman, On the Davenport–Heilbronn
[20]
[21]
[22]
theorems and second order terms, Inventiones mathematicae (2010), 1–61.
Serge Cantat, Dynamique des automorphismes des surfaces K3, Acta Math. 187 (2001),
no. 1, 1–57.
Serge Cantat, Dynamics of automorphisms of compact complex surfaces, Frontiers in
Complex Dynamics: In Celebration of John Milnor's 80th Birthday (Scott Sutherland
Araceli Bonifant, Misha Lyubich, ed.), Princeton University Press, 2014, pp. 463–514.
J. W. S. Cassels, Rational quadratic forms, London Mathematical Society Monographs,
vol. 13, Academic Press Inc. [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers], London, 1978.
[23] Arthur Cayley, A Memoir on Quartic Surfaces, Proc. London Math. Soc. S1-3, no. 1, 19.
[24]
, The collected mathematical papers. Volume 1, Cambridge Library Collection,
[25]
[26]
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009, Reprint of the 1889 original.
F. Cossec and I. Dolgachev, On automorphisms of nodal Enriques surfaces, Bull. Amer.
Math. Soc. (N.S.) 12 (1985), no. 2, 247–249.
Franc¸ois R. Cossec, Reye congruences, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 280 (1983), no. 2, 737–
751.
[27] Elisa Dardanelli and Bert van Geemen, Hessians and the moduli space of cubic surfaces,
Algebraic geometry, Contemp. Math., vol. 422, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2007,
pp. 17–36.
[28] H. Davenport and H. Heilbronn, On the density of discriminants of cubic fields, Bull.
London Math. Soc. 1 (1969), 345–348.
[30]
[29] B. N. Delone and D. K. Faddeev, The theory of irrationalities of the third degree,
Translations of Mathematical Monographs, Vol. 10, American Mathematical Society,
Providence, R.I., 1964.
I. V. Dolgachev, Mirror symmetry for lattice polarized K3 surfaces, J. Math. Sci. 81 (1996),
no. 3, 2599–2630, Algebraic geometry, 4.
Igor Dolgachev and Jonghae Keum, Birational automorphisms of quartic Hessian sur-
faces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 354 (2002), no. 8, 3031–3057.
Igor V. Dolgachev, Classical algebraic geometry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
2012, A modern view.
[31]
[32]
[33] David
The
of
http://11011110.livejournal.com/124705.html.
Eppstein,
many
faces
the
Nauru
graph,
[34] Dino Festi, Alice Garbagnati, Bert van Geemen, and Ronald van Luijk, The Cayley-Oguiso
[35]
automorphism of positive entropy on a K3 surface, J. Mod. Dyn. 7 (2013), no. 1, 75–97.
I. M. Gelfand, M. M. Kapranov, and A. V. Zelevinsky, Discriminants, resultants and
multidimensional determinants, Modern Birkhauser Classics, Birkhauser Boston Inc.,
Boston, MA, 2008, Reprint of the 1994 edition.
[36] Eknath Ghate and Eriko Hironaka, The arithmetic and geometry of Salem numbers, Bull.
[37]
[38]
[39]
Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 38 (2001), no. 3, 293–314.
Francois Greer, Zhiyuan Li, and Zhiyu Tian, Picard groups on moduli of K3 surfaces with
Mukai models, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (2015), no. 16, 7238–7257.
J. I. Hutchinson, The Hessian of the cubic surface. II, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 6 (1900),
no. 8, 328–337.
JI Hutchinson, The hessian of the cubic surface, Bulletin of the American Mathematical
Society 5 (1899), no. 6, 282–292.
[40] D. Huybrechts, Lectures on K3 surfaces, http://www.math.uni-bonn.de/people/huybrech/K3.ht
[41] C.H. Jessop, Quartic surfaces with singular points, Cambridge University Press, 1916.
[42]
P. I. Katsylo, Rationality of fields of invariants of reducible representations of the group
Manjul Bhargava, Wei Ho, and Abhinav Kumar
82
SL2, Vestnik Moskov. Univ. Ser. I Mat. Mekh. (1984), no. 5, 77–79.
[43] K. Kodaira, On compact complex analytic surfaces. I, Ann. of Math. (2) 71 (1960), 111–
152.
[44]
[45]
, On compact analytic surfaces. II, III, Ann. of Math. (2) 77 (1963), 563–626; ibid.
78 (1963), 1–40.
Stephen Kudla, A note about special cycles on moduli spaces of K3 surfaces, Arithmetic
and geometry of K3 surfaces and Calabi-Yau threefolds, Fields Inst. Commun., vol. 67,
Springer, New York, 2013, pp. 411–427.
[47]
[46] Giuseppe Lombardo, Chris Peters, and Matthias Schuett, Abelian fourfolds of Weil type
and certain K3 double planes, preprint (2012), http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.5997.
Shouhei Ma, Rationality of fields of invariants for some representations of SL2 × SL2,
Compos. Math. 149 (2013), no. 7, 1225–1234.
[48] Keiji Matsumoto, Takeshi Sasaki, and Masaaki Yoshida, The monodromy of the period
map of a 4-parameter family of K3 surfaces and the hypergeometric function of type (3, 6),
Internat. J. Math. 3 (1992), no. 1, 164.
[49] Davesh Maulik and Rahul Pandharipande, Gromov-Witten theory and Noether-Lefschetz
theory, A celebration of algebraic geometry, Clay Math. Proc., vol. 18, Amer. Math. Soc.,
Providence, RI, 2013, pp. 469–507.
[50] Alan L. Mayer, Families of K − 3 surfaces, Nagoya Math. J. 48 (1972), 1–17.
[51] Curtis T. McMullen, Dynamics on K3 surfaces: Salem numbers and Siegel disks, J. Reine
Angew. Math. 545 (2002), 201–233.
[52]
[53]
[54]
[55]
, K3 surfaces, entropy and glue, J. Reine Angew. Math. 658 (2011), 1–25.
Shigeru Mukai, Curves, K3 surfaces and Fano 3-folds of genus ≤ 10, Algebraic geometry
and commutative algebra, Vol. I, Kinokuniya, Tokyo, 1988, pp. 357–377.
, Polarized K3 surfaces of genus 18 and 20, Complex projective geometry (Trieste,
1989/Bergen, 1989), London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., vol. 179, Cambridge Univ.
Press, Cambridge, 1992, pp. 264–276.
, Polarized K3 surfaces of genus thirteen, Moduli spaces and arithmetic geometry,
Adv. Stud. Pure Math., vol. 45, Math. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 2006, pp. 315–326.
[56] Kok Onn Ng, The classification of (3, 3, 4) trilinear forms, J. Korean Math. Soc. 39 (2002),
no. 6, 821–879.
[57] V. V. Nikulin, Kummer surfaces, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 39 (1975), no. 2, 278–
293, 471, English translation: Math. USSR. Izv. 9 (1975) no. 2, 261–275.
[58]
[59]
, Finite groups of automorphisms of Kahlerian K3 surfaces, Trudy Moskov. Mat.
Obshch. 38 (1979), 75–137, English translation: Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. 38 (1980),
71-135.
, Integer symmetric bilinear forms and some of their geometric applications, Izv.
Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 43 (1979), no. 1, 111–177, 238.
[60] Keiji Oguiso, The third smallest Salem number in automorphisms of K3 surfaces, Alge-
braic geometry in East Asia-Seoul 2008, Adv. Stud. Pure Math., vol. 60, Math. Soc.
Japan, Tokyo, 2010, pp. 331–360.
[61] Keiji Oguiso, Free automorphisms of positive entropy on smooth Kahler surfaces, preprint
(2012), https://arxiv.org/abs/1202.2637v3.
[62] Bjorn Poonen and Michael Stoll, Most odd degree hyperelliptic curves have only one
rational point, Ann. of Math. (2) 180 (2014), no. 3, 1137–1166.
Paul Reschke, Salem numbers and automorphisms of complex surfaces, Math. Res. Lett.
19 (2012), no. 2, 475–482.
Igor Rivin, Algorithm to compute the integral orthogonal group, MathOverflow,
[63]
[64]
Orbit Parametrizations for K3 Surfaces
83
http://mathoverflow.net/q/143543 (version: 2013-09-29).
[65] T. G. Room, Self-transformations of determinantal quartic surfaces. I, Proc. London Math.
Soc. (2) 51 (1950), 348–361.
[66] B. Saint-Donat, Projective models of K − 3 surfaces, Amer. J. Math. 96 (1974), 602–639.
2-Selmer
[67] Arul
(2013),
group
http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.3531.
and Xiaoheng Wang,
Average
hyperelliptic
of
size
curves,
Shankar
of
Jacobians
of monic
even
the
preprint
[68] Virgil Snyder and F. R. Sharpe, Certain quartic surfaces belonging to infinite discontinuous
Cremonian groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 16 (1915), no. 1, 62–70.
[69] Takashi Taniguchi and Frank Thorne, Secondary terms in counting functions for cubic
fields, Duke Math. J. 162 (2013), no. 13, 2451–2508.
[70]
Jack Thorne, The arithmetic of simple singularities, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, 2012.
[71] A. N. Tjurin, The intersection of quadrics, Uspehi Mat. Nauk 30 (1975), no. 6(186), 51–99.
[72] C. T. C. Wall, Pencils of binary quartics, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova 99 (1998), 197–
[73] Kevin Wilson, Three perspectives on n points in Pn−2, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University,
217.
2012.
[74] Melanie Matchett Wood, Rings and ideals parameterized by binary n-ic forms, J. Lond.
Math. Soc. (2) 83 (2011), no. 1, 208–231.
[75]
, Parametrization of ideal classes in rings associated to binary forms, J. Reine
Angew. Math. 689 (2014), 169–199.
[76] David J. Wright and Akihiko Yukie, Prehomogeneous vector spaces and field extensions,
Invent. Math. 110 (1992), no. 2, 283–314.
|
1702.03919 | 2 | 1702 | 2017-02-27T18:41:15 | On mirrors of elliptically fibered K3 surfaces | [
"math.AG"
] | We study a two-parameter family of K3 surfaces of (generic) Picard rank $18$ which is mirror to the $18$-dimensional family of elliptically fibered K3 surfaces with a section. Members of this family are given as compactifications of hypersurfaces in three dimensional algebraic torus given by equations $y^2+z+z^{-1} + x^3 + ax +b =0$ where $a$ and $b$ are the parameters of the family. It follows from previous work of Morrison that these surfaces are double covers of Kummer surfaces coming from products of elliptic curves, and we establish this connection explicitly. This in turn provides a description of the one-parameter families of K3 surfaces which are mirror to polarized K3 surfaces of Picard rank one.
It has been brought to our attention that the results of this paper have already appeared in the literature. The appropriate references are added at the end of the introduction. | math.AG | math |
ON MIRRORS OF ELLIPTICALLY FIBERED K3
SURFACES
LEV A. BORISOV
Abstract. We study a two-parameter family of K3 surfaces of (generic)
Picard rank 18 which is mirror to the 18-dimensional family of elliptically
fibered K3 surfaces with a section. Members of this family are given as
compactifications of hypersurfaces in three dimensional algebraic torus
given by equations y2 + z + z−1 + x3 + ax + b = 0 where a and b are
the parameters of the family. It follows from previous work of Morrison
that these surfaces are double covers of Kummer surfaces coming from
products of elliptic curves, and we establish this connection explicitly.
This in turn provides a description of the one-parameter families of K3
surfaces which are mirror to polarized K3 surfaces of Picard rank one.
It has been brought to our attention that the results of this
paper have already appeared in the literature. The appropri-
ate references are added at the end of the introduction.
1. Introduction
Mirror symmetry for K3 surfaces got its start in the work of Dolgachev and
Nikulin (and independently Pinkham). The most authoritative reference in
the paper of Dolgachev [D]. In its most superficial description, it associates
to some k-dimensional families of algebraic K3 surfaces of generic Picard
rank 20 − k some (20 − k)-dimensional families of K3 surfaces of generic
Picard rank k.
More precisely, suppose that M is primitive sublattice of signature (1, ·)
of the second integer cohomology lattice of a K3 surface
M ⊂ H 2(K3, Z) = E8(−1) ⊕ E8(−1) ⊕ U ⊕ U ⊕ U
where E8 is the unique positive definite even unimodular lattice of rank
eight and U is the unimodular lattice of signature (1, 1) given by the pairing
matrix
1 0 (cid:19) .
(cid:18) 0 1
In its simplest form, Dolgachev's mirror to the family of M -polarized K3
surfaces is a family of M ∨-polarized K3 surfaces where M ∨ is an orthogonal
complement to some copy of U in the orthogonal complement M ⊥ of M in
H 2(K3, Z).
The set of algebraic K3 surfaces is a countable union of the 19-dimensional
families marked with h2ni, i.e. K3 surfaces with a choice of an ample (or
1
2
LEV A. BORISOV
more generally semi-ample) divisor class D with D2 = 2n. Naturally, these
are some of the most studied families of K3 surfaces, see [GNS]. So it makes
perfect sense to try to better understand their mirrors.
It was shown in
[D] that the Picard lattices of the (very general) members of these mirror
families are isomorphic to
E8(−1) ⊕ E8(−1) ⊕ U ⊕ h−2ni
and their moduli spaces are isomorphic to the well-known moduli curves
X0(n)+. The elements of these families are shown to be Shioda-Inose part-
ners of the products of elliptic curves related by a Fricke involution. Specif-
ically, a generic member of this family is birational to a double cover of the
Kummer surface E1 × E2 where E1 and E2 are isogeneous elliptic curves
that correspond to the parameters τ and (− 1
nτ ).
For each n one can extend a primitive element of H 2(K3, Z) of square
2n to a sublattice isomorphic to U .
It is therefore natural to consider a
larger two-dimensional family which is the Dolgachev mirror to the family
of U -marked K3 surfaces. The Picard group of a generic element of the
mirror is marked with E8(−1) ⊕ E8(−1) ⊕ U . These surfaces are Shioda-
Inose partners of the products of two elliptic curves E1 × E2 for a generic
choice of the unordered pair of elliptic curves.
This paper gives a very explicit description of these Shioda-Inose partners.
The main result is the following theorem.
Theorem 5.2. For generic choices of elliptic curves E1 and E2 with
J-invariants j1 and j2 the surface X which is the compactification of the
solution space of
y2 + z + z−1 + x3 −
1
1
3
1 j
j
3
2
48
x −
(j1 − 1728)
1
2 (j2 − 1728)
864
1
2
= 0
and E1 × E2 form a Shioda-Inose pair. Specifically, the minimal resolution
of the quotient of X by µ : (x, y, z) 7→ (x, −y, z−1) is isomorphic to the
Kummer surface of E1 × E2.
In particular, when E1 and E2 are related by the Fricke involution τ 7→
(− 1
nτ ), the above equation describes the members of the Dolgachev's one-
dimensional families (in n = 1 case the surface has a node, so one needs to
consider its resolution). This reduces the description of these surfaces to the
classical problem of modular polynomials, see for example [Si].
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we use Batyrev's descrip-
tion of mirror symmetry for hypersurfaces in toric varieties to construct
families of K3 surfaces X with the desired lattice E8(−1) ⊕ E8(−1) ⊕ U .
The main idea is that the U -marked K3 surfaces can be viewed as resolu-
tions of singularities of generic degree 12 surfaces in the weighted projective
space W P(1, 1, 4, 6). We also describe a natural Morrison-Nikulin involution
ON MIRRORS OF ELLIPTICALLY FIBERED K3 SURFACES
3
the geometry of Kummer surfaces Y associated to the product of elliptic
curves, in order to fix our notations. In Section 4 we describe an isomor-
µ on X and the resulting quotient K3 surfaces gX/µ. In Section 3 we recall
phism between surfaces Y and gX/µ by identifying generators in their Picard
lattices. However, this isomorphism is not explicit, in the sense that it does
not provide the identification of the parameters. This is rectified in Sec-
tion 5, where we prove out main result. Finally, in Section 6 we apply our
construction to the one-parameter families of Dolgachev.
Acknowledgements. This project grew from informal discussions with
Nick Sheridan, who organized a reading group on Homological Mirror Sym-
metry for K3 surfaces at the Institute for Advanced Study.
I have been
partially supported by the NSF Grants DMS-1201466 and DMS-1601907,
as well as by the Simons Foundation Fellowship. I also would like to thank
the Institute for Advanced Study for its hospitality during the year-long
program in Homlogical Mirror Symmetry.
Addendum. After the first version of the preprint has appeared,
it was brought to our attention that the results are known to the
experts. Specifically, the results appear in the work of Shioda [Sh], based
on the work of Kuwata and Shioda [KS]. They also appear in the work of
Clingher and Doran [CD]. I would like to thank Chuck Doran and Yuya
Matsumoto for bringing this to my attention.
I would like to also thank
Igor Dolgachev for historical comments regarding mirror symmetry for K3
surfaces.
2. Toric geometry of the mirror family.
In this section we explain how to express an elliptically K3 surface as an
anticanonical hypersurface in the weighted projective space W P(1, 1, 4, 6).
We then describe its mirror and observe that it has the expected Picard
marking coming from the ambient toric variety.
Let Z be a K3 surface with an elliptic fibration and a section. By this we
mean a map
µ : Z 7→ P1
with genus one fibers and a section S ⊂ Z, which is a smooth rational curve
with S2 = −2. Together with the class F of the fiber, the class of S forms
a sublattice U ⊆ Pic(Z) which is isomorphic to the standard hyperbolic
lattice. In other words, we get a U -marking on Z. It can be shown that a
U -marking in turn yields an elliptic fibration with section, see [H].
Generically, Pic(Z) = Z2 so the fibration XU → P1 has irreducible fibers,
which we will assume from now on. Taking the quotient by the Kummer
involution (−) on each fiber gives a fibration
π : Y = Z/(−) → P1
4
LEV A. BORISOV
whose fibers are isomorphic to P1. The image S1 of S satisfies
S2
1 =
1
2
(π∗S1)2 =
1
2
(2S)2 = −4,
thus the quotient is the Hirzebruch surface F4. Then the K3 surface Z is
the double cover of F4 ramified at twice anticanonical class. In the other
direction, note that on the Hirzebruch surface F4 there is a fiber F and
1 = −4, S1F = 1, F 2 = 0. The canonical class is
the section S1 with S2
(−2S − 6F ). The image of the ramification divisor lies in the linear system
4S1 + 12F . The linear system system 4S1 + 12F has the base locus S1,
and generic member is given by S1 plus a section of 3S1 + 12F which is
disjoint from S1. Then the double cover is a smooth K3 surface Z with the
ramification locus of Z → F4 given by two components that correspond to
the zero section and the tri-section of nonzero order two points of the fibers.
Let us now realize these surfaces Z as minimal resolutions of hypersurfaces
in a toric variety, specifically in a weighted projective space.
Proposition 2.1. A K3 surface Z with an elliptic fibration, a section, and
irreducible fibers is the minimal resolution of singularities of a hypersurface
of degree 12 in the weighted projective space W P(1, 1, 4, 6).
Proof. The Hirzebruch surface F4 is the minimal resolution of singularities of
the weighted projective plane W P(1, 1, 4) and O(3S1 + 12F ) is the pullback
of the O(12) line bundle on W P(1, 1, 4). So we can think of the K3 surface Z
as the resolution of singularities of the double cover of W P(1, 1, 4) ramified
at a divisor of degree 12. This can be naturally viewed as a hypersurface in
W P(1, 1, 4, 6) given by a degree 12 equation.
(cid:3)
It has been suggested by Batyrev [B] that the mirror to this family of
surfaces is obtained by switching the roles of two natural reflexive poly-
topes associated to a toric Fano threefold. This prescription was verified to
coincide with Dolgachev's one in [R].
Specifically, Batyrev's mirror symmetry produces a mirror family to K3
surfaces with elliptic fibration and a section whose general members are
compactifications X of the hypersurface X0 ⊂ (C∗)3 whose Newton polytope
∆ is the simplex with vertices
(2.1)
v1 = (−1, −4, −6), v2 = (1, 0, 0), v3 = (0, 1, 0), v4 = (0, 0, 1).
Indeed, the relation v1 + v2 + 4v3 + 6v4 = 0 comes from the weights of the
weighted projective space W P(1, 1, 4, 6) and determines the above vertices
uniquely up to isomorphism of Z3.
Remark 2.2. If we denote the monomials that correspond to
(0, 1, 1), (0, 1, 2), (−1, −2, −3),
ON MIRRORS OF ELLIPTICALLY FIBERED K3 SURFACES
5
by x, y and z respectively, then up to an invertible monomial the equation
of the hypersurface X0 is
0 = c1z + c2z−1 + c3 + c4x + c5x2 + c6x3 + c7y + c8y2 + c9xy
(2.2)
with z, z−1, x3 and y2 corresponding to the vertices of ∆ in the order of (2.1).
By using (C∗)3 action on the coordinates x, y, z as well as other symmetries
of the toric variety, such as (x, y, z) 7→ (α1x + α2, y + α3x + α4, z) one can
reduce this equation to a very simple form
(2.3)
0 = z + z−1 + y2 + x3 + ax + b.
This prompts the following definition.
Definition 2.3. We call the two parameter family of K3 surfaces which are
compactifications X = X(a, b) of the solution set of (2.3) a mirror to the
family of elliptically fibered K3 surfaces with a section.
In what follows, we will be studying these surfaces X in great detail.
We first need to realize them as hypersurfaces in nef-Fano toric varieties by
resolving the ambient toric variety. This will allow us to find 19 smooth
rational curves inside each X in a specific configuration.
There is a natural compactification Xsingular of the set of solutions to (2.2)
which is given by the closure inside the singular projective toric threefold
Proj(⊕k≥0C(k∆ ∩ Z3)). The fan of this toric threefold is given by the spans
of the proper subsets of the set of vertices of the simplex ∆∨ which is the
convex hull of the four vertices
(2.4)
(−1, −1, −1), (11, −1 − 1), (−1, 2, −1), (−1, −1, 1).
The fan of the resolution of the ambient toric variety is given by a triangu-
lation of the boundary of ∆∨.
If we assume that (a, b) are generic so that Xsingular is ∆-regular in the
sense of [B], then the singularities of Xsingular are simply inherited from
that of the ambient variety. In order for the closure of the proper preimage
of Xsingular to be smooth, we only need to ensure that this triangulation
involves all lattice points on the edges of ∆∨.
In other words, we allow
the ambient variety to be singular at zero-dimensional torus orbits, since a
∆-regular hypersurface is disjoint from these orbits. There are many such
choices, and some of them make the ambient variety smooth, but they all
give the same minimal resolution X → Xsingular.
Let us now study the geometry of X. Each facet of ∆ gives a toric subva-
riety of Proj(⊕k≥0C(k∆ ∩ Z3)) and we would like to understand the corre-
sponding closed subsets in Xsingular, as well as the singularities of Xsingular
along the generic points of these strata.
The codimension one subvarieties of Xsingular are given as follows. We
have genus zero curves which are hypersurfaces in toric surfaces
l1 ⊂ Proj(⊕k≥0C(k Conv(v2, v3, v4) ∩ Z3)),
6
and
LEV A. BORISOV
l2 ⊂ Proj(⊕k≥0C(k Conv(v1, v3, v4) ∩ Z3))
where the genus can be computed by looking at the number of interior lattice
points of the Newton polygon [Kh]. We also have
l3 ⊂ Proj(⊕k≥0C(k Conv(v1, v2, v4) ∩ Z3))
of genus one and
of genus two.
l4 ⊂ Proj(⊕k≥0C(k Conv(v1, v2, v3) ∩ Z3))
The intersections of the curves li correspond to toric strata of dimension
two in Proj(⊕k≥0C(k∆ ∩ Z3)). These give singular points on Xsingular pre-
cisely when the lattice length of the corresponding segment in ∆∨ is larger
than one. The number of points in the stratum is governed by the lattice
length of the segment in ∆. Specifically, we conclude that Xsingular has one
singular point of type A11 at l1 ∩ l2. It also has A2 singularities at l1 ∩ l3 and
l2 ∩ l3. Finally, it has A1 singularities at l1 ∩ l4 and l2 ∩ l4. In all of these
cases, the intersection consists of a single point. Note that l3 ∩ l4 consists of
two points, but Xsingular is smooth there.
Therefore, the minimal resolution X of Xsingular has the following tree of
smooth rational curves in it, of self-intersection (−2) each, marked as • in
the incidence graph below.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
(2.5)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Here the trivalent nodes correspond to the proper preimages of l1 and l2,
and all the other nodes are the exceptional curves of the crepant resolution
of one singularity of type A11 and two each of type A2 and A1.
We can now calculate the sublattice in the Picard group of X generated
by the above configuration of rational curves.
Proposition 2.4. The sublattice of Pic(X) generated by the rational curves
from (2.5) is isomorphic to the unimodular lattice of rank 18 given by
E8(−1) ⊕ E8(−1) ⊕ U which is embedded primitively into Pic(X). Sur-
face X has a natural structure of elliptic fibration with a section and two
fibers of type II∗ in Kodaira's classification.
Proof. Specifically, the two copies of E8 are generated by the two sides of
the diagram, and the lattice U perpendicular to them is generated by S and
ON MIRRORS OF ELLIPTICALLY FIBERED K3 SURFACES
7
F given respectively by
•
1
•
•
•
1
•
•
•
2
•
•
•
3
•
•
•
4
•
•
•
5
•
•
•
4
•
•
•
2
•
•
•
•
•
•
6
3
where • indicates coefficient 0. The embedding is primitive by unimodular-
ity.
We see that the second divisor above provides a fiber of elliptic fibration
and the first provides the section. Finally we observe that
1
•
•
2
•
3
•
4
•
5
•
4
•
2
•
6
3
•
•
provides another section of F . One way to see it by noticing that the
difference is the divisor of the monomial which corresponds to the lattice
point (1, 2, 3). Alternatively, one can argue that since the family is two-
dimensional, the very general member has Picard rank 18, so it suffices to
check that the difference intersects all of the curves from (2.5) trivially. (cid:3)
Remark 2.5. It is clear that the fibers of this elliptic fibration are given
by specifying the value of z in (2.2) or (2.3). Indeed, the rational function
that corresponds to (1, 2, 3) is precisely z, and this is not affected by the
automorphisms that are used to reduce (2.2) to (2.3).
We will now describe a natural Morrison-Nikulin involution on X (called
Nikulin involution in [M]). This involution is supposed to have 8 isolated
fixed points so that the resolution of the quotient is again a K3 surface. By
[M] such involution should switch the two copies of E8 and act trivially on
its orthogonal complement U . We recall the equation (2.3) that X = X(a, b)
8
LEV A. BORISOV
is the K3 compactification of y2 + z + z−1 + x3 + ax + b = 0 and construct
one such involution explicitly by
µ : (x, y, z) 7→ (x, −y, z−1)
on Xsingular which then gives an involution on X. We can also view this
involution as a restriction to X of an automorphism of the ambient toric
variety.
Note that this involution µ acts on the base of the elliptic fibration with
two fixed points z = ±1. At these two points, the action on the fiber is
that of Kummer involution (x, y) 7→ (x, −y) for 0 = y2 + x3 + ax + b ± 2.
Thus, the involution has eight fixed points at y = 0, z = ±1 so the quotient
X/µ has a crepant resolution which is itself a K3 surface. Let us denote
this resolution by gX/µ and observe that it has the following tree of smooth
rational curves in it. We get the following tree of rational curves on gX/µ.
◦
•
◦
•
◦
•
◦
(2.6)
◦
◦
◦
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
◦
Geometrically the diagram (2.6) corresponds to an elliptic fibration with
a section, one fiber of type II∗ and two fibers of type I∗
0. The ◦ symbols
blowup of X at the eight fixed points of µ.
indicate eight disjoint curves on dX/µ which are the exceptional curves of
dX/µ → X/µ. The double cover of dX/µ ramified at these curves is the
Remark 2.6. The classes of l3 and l4 and their images in dX/µ can be
computed, and we will need this description later. The (0, −1, −1) linear
function has divisor −l3 plus
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
0
0
2
1
2
1
ON MIRRORS OF ELLIPTICALLY FIBERED K3 SURFACES
9
so the divisor of l3 is the above one. The fixed points of µ do not lie in l3
but two of them do lie in the above tree of rational curves, namely at the
zero section S of the fibration. Therefore the image on dX/µ is given by the
following divisor.
0
2
2
2
2
2
0
1
0
2
1
2
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
3
6
3
0
0
Similarly, the monomial (0, −1, −2) gives −l4 plus
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
1
on X. The image of l4 on X/µ is not Cartier, so it does not pull back to
dX/µ. However, 2l4 does and its class on dX/µ is the following.
0
6
6
6
6
6
4
2
6
2
0
The following result follows from the work of Morrison [M], but we will
be later able to establish it directly.
10
LEV A. BORISOV
Theorem 2.7. For a generic choice of a and b there exist elliptic curves E1
and E2 such that the above K3 surface gX/µ is isomorphic to the Kummer
surface constructed from the product of elliptic curves E1 × E2.
Proof. The transcendental lattices of the abelian surface E1 × E2 and of
X are isomorphic, since they are both isomorphic to U ⊕ U . Indeed, the
embedding of E8(−1) ⊕ E8(−1) ⊕ U into H 2(X, Z) is unique up to isometry
by [N, Theorem 1.14.4], so the transcendental lattice is isomorphic to U ⊕ U .
This implies that E1 × E2 and X form Shioda-Inose pair, by [M, Theorem
6.3].
(cid:3)
Remark 2.8. While the above theorem establishes an isomorphism, it does
not make it explicit. It also does not identify how the natural parameters
on the moduli space of pairs of elliptic curves correspond to the parameters
of (a, b) of the family X(a, b) in (2.3). The next two sections make this
isomorphism explicit, including the parameter identification.
3. Kummer surfaces associated to the product of two elliptic
curves
In this section we review the theory of Kummer surfaces as it associated
to the product of two elliptic curves. Our main goal is to set up the notations
that will be used in the subsequent sections.
Let E1 and E2 be two elliptic curves. Define the Kummer surface Y as
the minimal resolution of the quotient (E1 × E2)/h±1i of the product of
these elliptic curves by the negation involution.
There are four horizontal smooth rational curves F1,i where 1 ≤ i ≤ 4
which correspond to the proper preimage of (E1×w)/h±1i ⊂ (E1×E2)/h±1i
for a point w ∈ E2 of order 2. There are also four vertical rational curves
F2,j which are proper preimages of (w × E2)/h±1i ⊂ (E1 × E2)/h±1i. These
eight curves are disjoint from each other.
There are also sixteen pairwise disjoint rational curves Gij which are the
exceptional curves of Y → (E1 × E2)/h±1i that satisfy
GijF1,k = δi,k, GijF2,k = δj,k.
where δ is the Kronecker symbol.
Note that there is a natural map
Y → P1 × P1 ∼= (E1/h±1i) × (E2/h±1i)
and the preimages of the O(0, 1) and O(1, 0) will be denoted by F1 and F2.
Each of these invertible sheaves defines an elliptic fibration structure on Y ,
with four fibers of type I∗
0. Specifically, for each i we have the relations in
Picard group of Y
F1 = 2F1,i +
4Xj=1
Gi,j, F2 = 2F2,i +
4Xj=1
Gj,i.
ON MIRRORS OF ELLIPTICALLY FIBERED K3 SURFACES
11
Remark 3.1. It can be shown that for very general choices of E1 and E2,
the divisors Gij, F1,i, F2,i generate the Picard group of Y , but we will not
need this statement.
Remark 3.2. There are other smooth rational curves on Y . For example,
consider the class D = F1 + F2 − Gi1,j1 − Gi2,j2 − Gi3,j3. Since D2 = −2,
and DF1 = 2 > 0, it is an effective class. It is easy to see that if all ik are
distinct and all jk are distinct then h0(Y, D) = 1 and it is given by a smooth
rational curve which is a proper preimage of a (1, 1) curve on P1 × P1 that
passes through the three points that are the images of the type G divisors.
We find it useful to denote the divisor classes on Y by a pair of numbers
and a matrix in order to better visualize them. For example,
(3, 2);
0 0 −1 1
0 0
0 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
stands for 3F1 + 2F2 − G1,3 + G1,4 + 4G3,1. Some of the classes might require
half-integers to be expressed in this manner. For example, F1,3 and F2,2 are
represented by
(1, 0);
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 − 1
2 − 1
2 − 1
− 1
2
0
0
0
0
and (0, 1);
0 − 1
2
0 − 1
2
0 − 1
2
0 − 1
2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
respectively. The self-intersection of the divisor given by (a, b); A is 4ab −
2 Tr(AAT ).
4. Isomorphism
In this section we will construct isomorphisms between the surfaces Y
and gX/µ from previous two sections, which will make Theorem 2.7 more
explicit. Note that such isomorphism is far from unique, since Aut(Y ) is
infinite, with generators calculated in [KK].
Remark 4.1. The process of finding an explicit isomorphism started from
looking for the generically 2 : 1 map gX/µ → (P1)2 that comes from taking
the quotient by the involution (x, y, z) 7→ (x, −y, z) and then contractions,
by identifying the branch locus of the map. However, the argument that
will be presented in this paper goes from the opposite direction. Thus,
even though the construction may look like a magic trick of some sort, it is
actually an outcome of a deliberate process, aided by Pari-GP.
12
LEV A. BORISOV
Consider the divisor D on Y given by
(3, 4);
0
−1 −1 −2
0
−2 −2
0
0 −3
0
0 −1
0
0
0
We have D2 = 48 − 2(6 + 8 + 9 + 1) = 0, so D gives an elliptic fibration,
as long as it is base-point free.
Observe that this divisor
D = 3F1 + 4F2 − G1,1 − G1,2 − 2G1,3 − 2G2,1 − 2G2,2 − 3G3,4 − G4,3
intersects trivially the following nine irreducible divisors that are arranged
in an affine E8 diagram according to their intersections.
F1,1
G1,4
F2,4
G4,4
G2,4
F1,2
G2,3
F2,3
G3,3
Moreover, one has the identity in Pic(Y )
(4.1) D = 2F1,1 +4G1,4 +3G4,4 +6F2,4 +5G2,4 +4F1,2 +3G2,3 +2F2,3 +G3,3.
Since it can be seen that the restriction of D to each of the above curves is
trivial, an easy calculation shows that h0(D) = 2 and we see that D gives
an elliptic fibration Y → P1 with the above type II∗ fiber.
We will also now establish two I∗
0 fibers. We observe that F2,1, G3,1, G4,1
intersect D trivially, as does the curve C1 in class F1+F2−G1,3−G2,2−G3,4
considered in Remark 3.2. Note that F2,1 intersects the other three curves
at one point each, and these intersection points are distinct. We denote by
C2 the difference
C2 =D − 2F2,1 − G3,1 − G4,1 − C1
=2F1 + 2F2 − G1,2 − G1,3 − G2,1 − G2,2 − G4,3 − 2G3,4.
Observe that the dimension count shows that there exists a (2, 2) curve on
P1 × P1 with double vanishing at a point and vanishing at five more points.
Moreover, while this configuration of six points is not generic, one can easily
see that this curve is irreducible by looking at possible splittings of it. We
will also calculate the equation of this curve explicitly in the next section.
Therefore, we get a I∗
0 fiber of Y → P1 with curves
C2
C1
F2,1
G4,1
G3,1
The other fiber consists of F2,2, G3,2, G4,2 and two other rational curves C3
and C4 defined similarly to C1 and C2.
ON MIRRORS OF ELLIPTICALLY FIBERED K3 SURFACES
13
Note that we also have an explicit section of the elliptic fibration which
is given by F1,3. In fact, we can label the tree of rational curves in (2.6) by
the corresponding curves in Y as follows. This labeling can be thought of
as a key to our construction, both mathematically and visually.
(4.2)
C1
C2
F2,1 G4,1
G3,1
F1,3 G3,3
F2,3 G2,3
F1,2 G2,4
G3,2
C4
F2,2 G4,2
C3
G1,4
F1,1
F2,4
G4,4
Remark 4.2. Now that we have established this somewhat explicit isomor-
phism between generic Kummer surfaces of E1 × E2 and the resolutions of
The Kummer surface has an involution with the fixed locus ⊔iF1,i⊔iF2,i such
that the corresponding quotient is the blowup of (P1)2 in 16 points. The
the quotients gX/µ, we would like to identify the natural involutions on them.
surface gX/µ has an involution that comes from the involution
(x, y, z) 7→ (x, −y, z)
on X that commutes with µ. We claim that under our isomorphism these
involutions coincide. Indeed, the composition of these involutions preserves
the holomorphic two form on Y ∼= gX/µ. It also has F1,3 in its fixed locus.
Since the fixed locus must be even dimensional, it means that the product
of the involutions is the identity.
Corollary 4.3. The above remark implies that the remaining type F curve
F1,4 is the three-section whose fibers consist of nonzero points of order two.
Indeed, this three-section is fixed under (x, y, z) 7→ (x, −y, z).
Remark 4.4. One may switch the roles of E1 and E2 and consider the
elliptic fibration Y → P1 given by the divisor
0
0
0
0
0 −1
0
−1 −2
−1 −2
0
−2
0
0 −3
(4, 3);
.
It can be shown that this new divisor maps to D under one of the generators
of the automorphism group Y described in [KK].
14
LEV A. BORISOV
Remark 4.5. We observe that X can be obtained from Y by taking a
double cover ramified at the disjoint rational curves
C1, C2, C3, C4, G3,1, G3,2, G4,1, G4,2
and then contracting the ramification locus.
Remark 4.6. While the discussion of this section identifies the Picard lat-
tice of the generic surfaces Y and dX/µ, it does not provide us with an
identification of the parameters of the corresponding families. This will be
accomplished in the next section by a direct calculation.
5. Explicit formulas
In this section we will make explicit the isomorphism from the previous
section. We used Maple symbolic manipulation software, although in prin-
ciple these formulas are simple enough to do by hand.
We will explicitly compute two sections of D on Y . We will assume that Y
is the resolution of the double cover of P1×P1 with homogeneous coordinates
(u1 : v1) and (u2 : v2) ramified at
{u2 = 0} ∪ {v2 = 0} ∪ {u2 = v2} ∪ {u2 = λ2v2}
∪{u1 = 0} ∪ {v1 = 0} ∪ {u1 = v1} ∪ {u1 = λ1v1}.
The proper preimages of the above lines are F1,1, . . . , F1,4, F2,1, . . . , F2,4 in
this order. Then we are looking for the homogeneous polynomials of bidegree
(4, 3) with the vanishing conditions prescribed by the matrix
0
−1 −1 −2
0
−2 −2
0
0 −3
0
0 −1
0
0
0
.
By (4.1) the E8 fiber corresponds on P1 × P1 to the (4, 3) polynomial
H∞ = (λ2 − 1)(u1 − λ1v1)3(u1 − v1)u2v2
2.
It is scaled by (λ2 − 1) to simplify some further formulas.
It is a bit harder to calculate the other fibers. Specifically, for the fiber
2F2,1 + G3,1 + G4,1 + C1 + C2 we need to know the equations of C1 and C2.
The curve C1 comes from a (1, 1) polynomial which vanishes on (1 : 1; 0 : 1),
(1 : 0; 1 : 0) and (λ1 : 1; 1 : 1). Such polynomial is given by
(λ1 − 1)v1u2 − u1v2 + v1v2.
To find the polynomial of C2 we need to find a (2, 2) polynomial which
vanishes to the second order at (λ1 : 1; 1 : 1) and vanishes at (1 : 0; 0 : 1),
(1 : 1; 0 : 1), (0 : 1; 1 : 0), (1 : 0; 1 : 0), (1 : 1; λ2 : 1). It is given by
λ1(λ1 − 1)v2
1v2
2 + λ1(λ1λ2 − 2λ1 + 1)v2
+(2λ2
1 − 2λ1λ2 − λ1 + 1)u1v1u2v2 − (λ1 − 1)2u1v1u2
1u2v2 − λ1(λ1 − 1)u1v1v2
2 + (λ2 − 1)u2
2
1u2v2.
ON MIRRORS OF ELLIPTICALLY FIBERED K3 SURFACES
15
Overall, the (4, 3) polynomial is given by
H+ = u1(cid:16)(λ1 − 1)v1u2 − u1v2 + v1v2(cid:17)·
1v2
2 + λ1(λ1λ2 − 2λ1 + 1)v2
1u2v2 − λ1(λ1 − 1)u1v1v2
2
·(cid:16)λ1(λ1 − 1)v2
+(2λ2
1 − 2λ1λ2 − λ1 + 1)u1v1u2v2 − (λ1 − 1)2u1v1u2
2 + (λ2 − 1)u2
1u2v2(cid:17).
For the other fiber we need to find the equations of
C3 ∈ F1 + F2 − G1,3 − G2,1 − G3,4
and
C4 ∈ 2F1 + 2F2 − G1,1 − G1,3 − G2,2 − G2,1 − G4,3 − 2G3,4.
These polynomials are given by
(λ1 − 1)u1u2 − λ1u1v2 + λ1v1v2
and
−λ2
1(λ2 − 1)v2
1u2v2 + (1 − λ1)u1v1v2
2 + (−λ2
1 + 2λ1λ2 + λ1 − 2)u1v1u2v2
+(λ1 − 1)2u1v1u2
2 + (λ1 − 1)u2
1v2
2 + (−λ1 − λ2 + 2)u2
1u2v2
respectively, which gives
H− = v1(cid:16)(λ1 − 1)u1u2 − λ1u1v2 + λ1v1v2(cid:17)·
·(cid:16) − λ2
1(λ2 − 1)v2
1u2v2 + (1 − λ1)u1v1v2
2 + (−λ2
1 + 2λ1λ2 + λ1 − 2)u1v1u2v2
1u2v2(cid:17).
+(λ1 − 1)2u1v1u2
2 + (λ1 − 1)u2
1v2
2 + (−λ1 − λ2 + 2)u2
As expected, the three polynomials H∞, H+ and H− are linearly dependent,
specifically,
H∞ + H+ + H− = 0.
Recall that the rational function z + z−1 takes the value ∞, 2 and (−2)
at the three respective fibers. As such, we see that z + z−1 is given by
2H −1
∞ (H+ − H−), which fixes it, once we fix the order of I∗
0 fibers.
Remark 5.1. The rational map X− → gX/µ ∼= Y is ramified along the
eight divisors
C1, C2, C3, C4, G3,1, G4,1, G3,2, G4,2.
This means that the field of rational functions of X is the degree two exten-
sion of the field of the rational functions of the Kummer surface Y obtained
by attaching the square root of
In the notations of (2.3), this square root would be z−1
z+1 .
H+H −1
− .
16
LEV A. BORISOV
Our next goal to explicitly calculate the embedding into a toric variety
that allows one to write Y as a quotient of hypersurface of (2.3). In order
to accomplish this, we will now consider the meaning of x and y, based on
Remark 2.6.
First observe that x is a rational function which is the ratio of two sections
of the divisor of l3. These are given by
(5.1)
G3,1 + G3,2 + 2F1,3 + 2G3,3 + 2F2,3 + 2G2,3 + 2F1,2 + 2G2,4 + 2F2,4 + G1,4 + G4,4
= 2F1 + 2F2 − G1,3 − G4,3 − G2,1 − G2,2 − 2G3,4.
In addition to the divisor (5.1) above that corresponds to
(u1 − v1)(u1 − λ1v1)(u2 − v2)v2
1λ2−2λ2
1+λ1)v2
1u2v2+(2λ1−λ2
1−2λ1λ2−λ1+1)u1v1u2v2
+(λ1 − λ2
1)u1v1v2
1−1)u1v1u2
2+(2λ2
2 + (λ2 − 1)u2
1u2v2.
We denote by x1 the ratio
one has
(λ2
(cid:16)(λ2
1λ2−2λ2
1+λ1)v2
1u2v2+(2λ1−λ2
1−1)u1v1u2
2+(2λ2
1−2λ1λ2−λ1+1)u1v1u2v2
+(λ1 − λ2
1)u1v1v2
2 + (λ2 − 1)u2
1u2v2(cid:17)(u1 − v1)−1(u1 − λ1v1)−1(u2 − v2)−1v−1
2 .
It will be equal to x up to a change of coordinates.
We see that y2 makes sense as a rational function on X/µ. In a generic
fiber of X/µ → P1 it has zeros of order two at points of order two and pole
of order six at zero. Note that the three-section of points of order two is
identified with F1,4 by Corollary 4.3. On the resolution gX/µ it will have
zeros of order one at C1, C2, G4,1, G4,2, C3, C4 and poles of order three at
G3,1, G3,2. Since we know that its divisor intersects all curves at degree
zero, we can figure out the contribution of the components of the E8 fiber.
This gives the divisor of y2 as
2F1,4 −
(−1)
(−1)
(−1)
0
3
6
3
0
(−1)
(−1)
6
6
6
6
6
4
2
6
2
(−1)
ON MIRRORS OF ELLIPTICALLY FIBERED K3 SURFACES
17
which is consistent with the formula for the divisor of 2l4 from Remark 2.6
and Corollary 4.3. So we can write the rational function of y2 in terms of
(u1 : v1, u2 : v2) as
y2
1 = (u2 − λ2v2)H+H−u−1
1 v−1
1 (u2 − v2)−3(u1 − v1)−3v−3
2 (u1 − λ1v1)−3u−1
2
up to a constant factor.
A Maple calculation verifies that
x3
1+(λ1λ2−2λ1+λ2+1)x2
1−(λ1λ2−λ1+1)(λ1 −λ2)x1−
1
2
(λ1−1)(λ2−1)λ1λ2
+y2
1 −
1
4
λ1(λ1 − 1)λ2(λ2 − 1)(z + z−1) = 0.
By a linear change of variables this equation can be rewritten in the form
(2.3)
y2 + z + z−1 + x3 + ax + b = 0
with
a = −
4
3
2
3
(λ2
1 − λ1 + 1)(λ2
2 − λ2 + 1)
(cid:16)λ1(λ1 − 1)λ2(λ2 − 1)(cid:17) 2
3
,
b = −
2
27
(λ1 + 1)(λ1 − 2)(2λ1 − 1)(λ2 + 1)(λ2 − 2)(2λ2 − 1)
λ1(λ1 − 1)λ2(λ2 − 1)
.
By using the formula [Si]
j = 256
(λ2 − λ + 1)3
λ2(λ − 1)2
,
we can rewrite the coefficients a and b in terms of the J-invariants j1 and
j2 of the elliptic curves E1 and E2 as
a = −
1
48
1
1
3
1 j
j
3
2 ,
b = −
(j1 − 1728)
1
2 (j2 − 1728)
864
1
2
where different choices of the roots lead to isomorphic surfaces.
We will state this as a main result of this paper.
Theorem 5.2. For generic choices of elliptic curves E1 and E2 with J-
invariants j1 and j2 the surface X which is the compactification of the so-
lution space of
(5.2)
y2 + z + z−1 + x3 −
1
1
3
1 j
j
3
2
48
x −
(j1 − 1728)
1
2 (j2 − 1728)
864
1
2
= 0
and E1 × E2 form a Shioda-Inose pair. Specifically, the minimal resolution
of the quotient of X by µ : (x, y, z) 7→ (x, −y, z−1) is isomorphic to the
Kummer surface of E1 × E2.
18
LEV A. BORISOV
Remark 5.3. Even though the statement of Theorem 5.2 is symmetric with
respect to the interchange of E1 and E2, the isomorphism provided by our
construction depends on the choice of the ordering. A different choice gives
an isomorphism that differs by an automorphism of the Kummer surface of
E1 × E2, see Remark 4.4.
Remark 5.4. We can observe that there is a map from a double cover
of Y to X under for any pair of values of the J-invariant.
Indeed, all of
the formulas of this section are applicable as long as λi 6∈ {0, 1}. The only
cases where Shioda-Inose structure is not given by Theorem 5.2 are the cases
where the surface acquires additional singularities. These would only occur
at y = 0, z = ±1. So we need to exclude the loci where x3 + ax + b ± 2
have a double root. It turns out that this happens exactly when j1 = j2, i.e.
E1 ∼= E2.
6. One-dimensional subfamilies
Our initial interest in this problem was motivated by the study of mirrors
of 19-dimensional families of polarized K3 surfaces of generic Picard rank
one, as in [D]. It has been shown in [D] that the mirrors of K3 surfaces with
h2ni-polarization are one-parameter families birational to the double covers
as τ varies in the upper half plane (or in
of Kummer surfaces of Eτ × E− 1
the moduli curve X0(n)+). These mirror families are marked with a lattice
E8(−1) ⊕ E8(−1) ⊕ U ⊕ h−2ni.
nτ
Indeed as we specialize to Eτ ×E− 1
nτ
, the equations (5.2) will yield surfaces
of Picard rank 19.
Theorem 6.1. For n > 1 a very general τ in the upper half plane, the K3
surface which is the compactification of
y2 + z + z−1 + x3 −
j(τ )
1
3 j(− 1
nτ )
48
1
3
x −
(j(τ ) − 1728)
1
2 (j(− 1
864
nτ ) − 1728)
1
2
= 0
has Picard lattice isomorphic to E8(−1) ⊕ E8(−1) ⊕ U ⊕ h−2ni.
Proof. This statement follows from the fact that E1×E2 and X form Shioda-
Inose pair for generic τ , since our explicit isomorphism still applies, and the
calculation of the transcendental lattice in [D].
The only subtlety is that in n = 1 case the surface X is singular, see
Remark 5.4. Then the correct Shioda-Inose partner is the resolution of the
A1 singular point of X, which yields the Picard group E8(−1) ⊕ E8(−1) ⊕
U ⊕ h−2i as expected.
(cid:3)
We can see the Picard lattice of X from Theorem 6.1 more explicitly as
is that the corresponding curves
follows. The defining feature of Eτ × E− 1
have n : 1 isogenies to each other. To describe one of them we will view Eτ
nτ
ON MIRRORS OF ELLIPTICALLY FIBERED K3 SURFACES
19
as quotients of C by Z + Zτ and Z + Z(− 1
and E− 1
observe that there is a group homomorphism ρ : Eτ → E− 1
nτ
nτ ) respectively and
given by
nτ
z mod(Z + Zτ ) 7→
z
τ
mod(Z + Z(−
1
nτ
)).
This group homomorphism gives an elliptic fibration
ρ : Eτ × E− 1
nτ
→ E− 1
nτ
, (z1, z2) 7→ z2 + ρ(z1)
which then gives rise to an elliptic fibration
ρY : Y → P1 ∼= E− 1
nτ
/(−).
The general fiber of ρY is a divisor RY on Y which intersects Gi,j trivially
and satisfies
RY F1 = 2n, RY F2 = 2.
We observe that (RY − nF2 − F1) is orthogonal to all of the Fi,j and Gi,j
divisors on Y and
(RY − nF2 − F1)2 = −4n − 4n + 4n = −4n.
Recall that by Remark 4.5 the K3 surface X is obtained from a double
cover of Y at eight divisors that are linear combinations of Fi,j and Gi,j
and then contraction of eight (−1) curves. We can thus view Pic(X) as an
orthogonal complement in the double cover to the 8 exceptional divisors.
The pullback of (RY − nF2 − F1) to the double cover and then orthogonal
projection to an element RX ∈ Pic(X) will be orthogonal to the rank 18
sublattice E8(−1) ⊕ E8(−1) ⊕ U described in Section 2 and will have self-
intersection
(6.1)
R2
X = −8n.
Note however that RX and the aforementioned sublattice do not generate
the whole Picard group of X. Namely, there are four reducible fibers of ρY
. They give rise to elements
which correspond to points of order two on E− 1
of Picard group of Y which are half of R modulo the lattice generated by
F and G divisors. By pullback and projection, we get elements of Pic(X).
Since E8(−1) ⊕ E8(−1) ⊕ U is unimodular, and Picard of X is generically
19, the lattice Pic(X) is equal to E8(−1) ⊕ E8(−1) ⊕ U plus its orthogonal
complement which is generated by a single element. We know that it will
have self intersection (−2n) by (6.1).
nτ
Remark 6.2. It would be interesting to connect our Theorem 6.1 to the
work of Dolgachev [D] for small values of n, using the known formulas for
classical modular polynomials [Si] which are polynomial equations that van-
ish on (j(τ ), j(− 1
nτ )). However, these classical modular polynomials have
rapidly growing complexity. The resulting K3 surfaces has very rich geo-
metric structure with multiple elliptic fibrations, which would make explicit
comparisons rather complicated.
20
LEV A. BORISOV
Remark 6.3. We will also briefly comment that Theorem 5.2 can be used in
a uniform way to provide many example of K3 surfaces of Picard rank 20 by
looking at pairs of isogeneous curves with complex multiplication, although
we are unaware of any potential applications.
References
[B]
[CD]
[D]
V. Batyrev, Dual polyhedra and mirror symmetry for Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces in
toric varieties, J. Algebraic Geom. 3 (1994), no. 3, 493-535.
A. Clingher, C. Doran, Modular invariants for lattice polarized K3 surfaces. Michi-
gan Math. J. 55 (2007), no. 2, 355-393.
I. Dolgachev, Mirror symmetry for lattice polarized K3 surfaces, Algebraic geom-
etry, 4. J. Math. Sci. 81 (1996), no. 3, 2599-2630.
[GNS] V. Gritsenko, K. Hulek, G. Sankaran, The Kodaira dimension of the moduli of K3
[H]
[KK]
[Kh]
surfaces, Invent. Math. 169 (2007), no. 3, 519-567.
D. Huybrechts, Lectures on K3 Surfaces. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Math-
ematics, 2016.
J. Keum, S. Kond¯o, The automorphism groups of Kummer surfaces associated
with the product of two elliptic curves, Transactions of the AMS 353 (2001), no.
4, p. 1469-1487.
A. Khovanskii, Newton polyhedra and the genus of complete intersections, Funct.
Anal. i ego pril. English translation: Functional Anal. Appl., 12 (1978), 38-46.
[M]
[N]
[KS] M. Kuwata, T. Shioda, Elliptic parameters and defining equations for elliptic
fibrations on a Kummer surface. Algebraic geometry in East Asia - Hanoi 2005,
177-215, Adv. Stud. Pure Math., 50, Math. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 2008.
D. Morrison, On K3 surfaces with large Picard number, Invent. Math. 75 (1984),
no. 1, p. 105-121.
Nikulin, Integral symmetric bilinear forms and some of their applications, Izv.
Akad. Nauk SSSR, 43, p. 111-177 (1979), Math. USSR Izvestija 14, p. 103-167
(1980).
F. Rohsiepe, Lattice polarized toric K3 surfaces, preprint arXiv:hep-th/0409290.
T. Shioda, Kummer sandwich theorem of certain elliptic K3 surfaces. Proc. Japan
Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. 82 (2006), no. 8, 137-140.
J. Silverman, Advanced topics in the arithmetic of elliptic curves. Graduate Texts
in Mathematics, 151. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994. xiv+525 pp. ISBN: 0-387-
94328-5.
[R]
[Sh]
[Si]
Department of Mathematics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854
E-mail address: [email protected]
|
1807.06936 | 1 | 1807 | 2018-07-18T13:54:54 | Strongly ambiguous Hilbert squares of projective K3 surfaces with Picard number one | [
"math.AG"
] | We provide a criterion for when Hilbert squares of complex projective K3 surfaces with Picard number one are strongly ambiguous. This criterion is the same as [DM, Proposition 3.14], but is obtained by a different method. In particular, this enables us to compute the automorphism groups of these Hilbert squares from a different point of view with respect to [BCNS]. | math.AG | math |
STRONGLY AMBIGUOUS HILBERT SQUARES OF PROJECTIVE K3
SURFACES WITH PICARD NUMBER ONE
RICCARDO ZUFFETTI
Abstract. We provide a criterion for when Hilbert squares of complex projective K3
surfaces with Picard number one are strongly ambiguous. This criterion is the same as
[DM, Proposition 3.14], but is obtained by a different method. In particular, this enables
us to compute the automorphism groups of these Hilbert squares from a different point
of view with respect to [BCNS].
Introduction
Let X be a nonsingular projective surface over C. We recall that X [n], the Hilbert
scheme of n points on X, is the space parametrizing 0-dimensional subschemes Z ⊂ X of
length n (see for further details [Be1, Deuxième Partie], [Na] and [GHJ, Section 21]). If S
is a projective K3 surface, the Hilbert square S[2] is an irreducible holomorphic symplectic
fourfold. We say that S[2] is strongly ambiguous if there exists another K3 surface S′ such
that S 6∼= S′ but S[2] ∼= S′[2]. We want to study the strongly ambiguous Hilbert squares
of projective K3 surfaces with Picard number one. The main result is [DM, Proposition
3.14], proved there through derived categories. In these pages we prove the same result
(see Theorem 7.3) only with the glueing of lattices, the Hodge decomposition, the Torelli
theorems and some properties of the ample and movable cones of S[2]. The method here
exposed is also applied to compute Aut(S[2]) (see Theorem 8.1). This is the main result
in [BCNS], but proved from a different point of view. In [C] one can find how to compute
Aut(S[n]) with n ≥ 2, while in [Ok] and [MMY] one can find a study on birational maps
between Hilbert squares.
In Sections 1, 2 we recall some general results on lattices, while in Sections 3, 4 we recall
some properties on Hilbert squares of projective K3 surfaces and their nef and movable
cones. Let S be a projective K3 surface with Picard number one, let h be an ample class
on S with h2 = 2e with e ∈ N. In Section 5 we recall the definition of FM partners of
S (see Definition 5.1), and the number of (isomorphism classes of) FM partners of S via
the glueing of lattices. In Sections 6, 7 we study a relation between the FM partners of
S and their Hilbert squares, in particular we want to understand for which e there exist
non isomorphic K3 surfaces such that their Hilbert squares are isomorphic. In Section 8
we apply the previous methods to determine Aut(S[2]).
Acknowledgments. We would like to thank Chiara Camere and Bert van Geemen
for their ideas and clarifications, and Alberto Cattaneo and Ciaran Meachan for their
suggestions on the final version of this work.
1. Lattices
A lattice is a pair (Γ, Q) consisting of a free Z-module of finite rank Γ together with
a symmetric bilinear form Q : Γ × Γ ! Z. Every lattice defines a quadratic form q(v) =
v2 := Q(v, v).
1
Given a Z-basis e1, . . . , er of Γ, the Gram matrix of Γ (with this basis) is the n × n
symmetric matrix which represents Q on this basis. The discriminant of a lattice (Γ, Q)
is dis(Γ, Q) := det G, where G is a Gram matrix of that lattice.
A lattice (Γ, Q) is said to be non degenerate if dis(Γ, Q) 6= 0, even if Q(v, v) ∈ 2Z for
We say that a map f : Γ1 ! Γ2 is an isometry between lattices if it is an isomorphism
all v ∈ S, unimodular if dis(Γ, Q) = ±1.
of Z-modules and preserves the bilinear forms.
A sublattice of a lattice (Γ, Q) is a free submodule Γ′ of Γ with the induced bilinear form
(Γ′, QΓ′×Γ′). If Γ/Γ′ is a finite group then
(1)
dis(Γ′) = [Γ : Γ′]2 · dis(Γ).
A sublattice is said to be primitive if the quotient module Γ/Γ′ is a free module.
Example 1.1. Let V be a subset of Γ and consider
then V ⊥ is a primitive sublattice of Γ.
V ⊥ := {v′ ∈ Γ : Q(v′, v) = 0 ∀v ∈ V },
The dual lattice of a non degenerate lattice (Γ, Q) is the Z-module
Γ∗ := { v ∈ ΓQ : Q(v, w) ∈ Z ∀w ∈ Γ} ⊂ ΓQ := Γ ⊗ Q,
together with the extension of Q on Γ∗, that is denoted again by Q. It is well known that
[Γ∗ : Γ] = det(G) = dis(Γ, Q), in particular if Γ is unimodular then Γ ∼= Γ∗ as lattices.
Let (Γ, Q) be a non degenerate lattice, then the discriminant group of Γ is the finite
group
AΓ := Γ∗/Γ,
which has order [Γ∗ : Γ] = dis(Γ, Q). When Γ is an even lattice, there is a well defined
quadratic form qΓ on the discriminant group given by the quadratic form q:
qΓ : AΓ ! Q/2Z,
qΓ(v) := Q(v, v) mod 2Z.
Proposition 1.2 (see [BPV, Chapter I, Lemma 2.5]). For a primitive sublattice E of a
unimodular lattice S there is an isomorphism AE ! AE⊥.
Definition 1.3. The group of self-isometries of a lattice (Γ, Q) is denoted by O(Γ); an
element of O(Γ) is called an isometry (or automorphism) of Γ.
An automorphism M ∈ O(Γ) of the lattice extends Q-linearly to an automorphism of
the Q-vector space ΓQ which preserves the Q-bilinear extension of Q. Therefore we have
a homomorphism
where M is the induced action on the discriminant group.
O(Γ) ! O(AΓ),
M ! M ,
2. Glueing lattices and glueing automorphisms
Let (Γ, Q) be an even lattice, E1 ⊂ Γ a primitive sublattice and E2 := E⊥
that E1 ⊕ E2 ⊆ Γ ⊆ E∗
Remark 2.1. As Γ is even and E1, E2 are perpendicular, if s ∈ Γ and writing s = (s1, s2) ∈
E∗
1 ⊕ E∗
1 . It is obvious
1 ⊕ E∗
2 .
2 we get:
Q(s, s) = Q(s1, s1) + Q(s2, s2) ∈ 2Z.
So by the definition of the quadratic form on a discriminant group, we have that qE1(s1) =
−qE2(s2).
2
Remark 2.2. Consider the abelian group AE1×AE2 = (E∗
form qE1 + qE2. The lattice Γ defines a subgroup
1⊕E∗
2 )/(E1⊕E2) with quadratic
IΓ := Γ/(E1 ⊕ E2) = { (s1, s2) ∈ AE1 × AE2 : s ∈ Γ} ,
that is isotropic (i.e. (qE1 +qE2)IΓ = 0), by Remark 2.1, of cardinality #IΓ = [Γ : E1⊕E2].
Moreover, if Γ is unimodular then Γ/(E1 ⊕ E2) ∼= AE1 ∼= AE2 by Proposition 1.2. So
! AE2 such that qE1(a1) = −qE2(ϕ(a1)) for all
there exists an isomorphism ϕ : AE1
a1 ∈ AE1, and we simply write qE1 = −qE2 in this case.
Definition 2.3. Given two non degenerate lattices (E1, Q1), (E2, Q2), we say that (Γ, Q)
arises from glueing (E1, Q1) and (E2, Q2) if it is a finite index overlattice of (E1 ⊕ E2, Q1 +
Q2).
The following well known proposition gives a relation between glued lattices and isotropic
subgroups.
Proposition 2.4. Let (E1, Q1), (E2, Q2) be even non degenerate lattices. There is a bijec-
tion between:
(1) isotropic subgroups I ⊂ AE1 × AE2,
(2) even lattices (Γ, Q) obtained by glueing (E1, Q1) and (E2, Q2),
given by
I 7! ΓI := (π1 × π2)−1(I),
Γ 7! IΓ := Γ/(E1 ⊕ E2),
i ! AEi for i = 1, 2 are the quotient maps.
where πi : E∗
Moreover if AE1 ∼= AE2 and qE1 = −qE2 then the unimodular even lattices obtained
by glueing E1 with E2 are in bijection with the (maximal) isotropic subgroups defined as
Iϕ = { (x, ϕ(x)) : x ∈ AE1 } for suitable isomorphisms ϕ : AE1
! AE2 such that qE1(x) =
−qE2(ϕ(x)) for all x ∈ AE1.
Proof. Let (Γ, Q) be a lattice such that E1 ⊕ E2 ⊂ Γ, with finite index and such that Q
restricts to Q1 + Q2 on E1 ⊕ E2, thus E2 = E⊥
1 in Γ. By Remark 2.2, IΓ is an isotropic
subgroup of AE1 × AE2.
Every isotropic subgroup of AE1 × AE2 defines an even lattice (Γ, Q) containing the
Indeed, let I be an isotropic subgroup of AE1 × AE2 =
Ei as orthogonal sublattices.
E∗
1/E1 × E∗
2/E2. Let ΓI := (π1 × π2)−1(I) and let Q be the restriction to ΓI of the Q-
1 × E∗
linear extension of Q1 + Q2 to E∗
2 . The isotropy condition shows that Q(s, s) ∈ 2Z
for all s ∈ ΓI . Moreover Q(x, y) ∈ Z for all x, y ∈ ΓI, indeed:
2Z ∋ Q(x + y, x + y) = Q(x, x) + Q(y, y) + 2Q(x, y)
and, since Q is even, Q(x, y) ∈ Z. Hence (ΓI , Q) is an even lattice. Since 0 ∈ IΓ,
π−1(0) = E1 ⊕ E2 ⊆ ΓI and E1, E2 are obviously orthogonal.
Eventually, we prove the assertion about unimodular even lattices. Suppose that Γ
is unimodular, then the claim follows by Remark 2.2. Conversely, let ϕ : AE1
! AE2
be an isomorphism such that qE1(a1) = −qE2(ϕ(a1)). Let I := { (x, ϕ(x)) : x ∈ AE1 } ⊂
AE1 × AE2, this is obviously isotropic and #I = #AE1. We know, see Formula (1), that
dis(E1 ⊕ E2) = [ΓI : E1 ⊕ E2]2 · dis(Γ).
But dis(E1 ⊕ E2) = dis(E1) · dis(E2) = (#AE1)2, hence dis(Γ) = ±1.
(cid:3)
We can also glue automorphisms on lattices obtained by glueing.
3
Corollary 2.5. Let (E1, Q1), (E2, Q2) be two even non degenerate lattices and let I, J ⊂
AE1 × AE2 be two isotropic subgroups.
If SI , SJ are two overlattices of E1 ⊕ E2 defined by two isotropic subgroups I, J and
M : SI ! SJ is an isometry such that M (Ei) ⊆ Ei for i = 1, 2 then (M1, M2)(I) = J,
where M1 := ME1 and M2 := ME2.
Conversely, let Mi ∈ O(Ei) for i = 1, 2 such that (M1, M2)(I) = J. Then (M1, M2)
extends to an isometry M : SI ! SJ .
3. Hilbert squares of projective K3 surfaces
In this section we recall some useful results on Hilbert squares of projective K3 surfaces
which we will use in the following sections.
In [BPV, Chapter VIII] one can find basic properties on K3 surfaces. We recall, to fix the
notation, that if S is a K3 surface then H 2(S, Z), endowed with the intersection product,
is a lattice with signature (3, 19) isometric to ΛK3 := U ⊕ U ⊕ U ⊕ E8(−1)⊕ E8(−1), where
U is the hyperbolic plane and E8 is the root lattice with rank 8.
Definition 3.1. Let X be a nonsingular projective surface over C. We define X [n], called
Hilbert scheme of n points on X, as the space parametrizing 0-dimensional subschemes
Z ⊂ X of length n, i.e. h0(OZ ) = n where H 0(OZ ) is the space of sections of the sheaf
OZ .
If S is a projective K3 surface then S[2] is an irreducible holomorphic symplectic fourfold
(see [GHJ, Section 21.2]). Moreover, the second cohomology group H 2(S[2], Z) carries a
natural integral primitive quadratic form qBB : H 2(S[2], Z) ! Z, called the Beauville–
Bogomolov form (see for further details [Ogr, Section 4.2] or [GHJ, Section 23]).
Proposition 3.2 (see [Be1, §6 Proposition 6] and [GHJ, Example 23.19]). Let S be a
projective K3 surface. There exists an injective homomorphism i : H 2(S, Z) ֒! H 2(S[2], Z)
which is compatible with the Hodge structures, and moreover
H 2(S[2], Z) = i(H 2(S, Z)) ⊕ Zξ,
for a suitable ξ ∈ H 2(S[2], Z) such that ξ2 := qBB(ξ) = −2.
Definition 3.3. Every smooth projective hyperkähler fourfold F is called of K3[2]-type if
there exists a projective K3 surface S such that F is a deformation of S[2].
By the Torelli Theorem, two projective K3 surfaces S and S′ are isomorphic if and only if
there exists a Hodge isometry (i.e. an isometry which preserves the Hodge decompositions)
between H 2(S, Z) and H 2(S′, Z) that is effective (i.e. it maps ample classes in ample
classes). The following theorem generalizes the previous statement to (smooth projective)
hyperkähler fourfolds of K3[2]-type. We will call it the Generalized Torelli Theorem.
Theorem 3.4 (Verbitsky, Markman, [DM, Theorem 2.2]). Let F1 and F2 be projective
hyperkähler fourfolds of K3[2]-type, with h1 and h2 ample classes of F1 and F2 respectively.
Let Φ : H 2(F1, Z) ! H 2(F2, Z) be a Hodge isometry such that Φ(h1) = h2; then there is
an isomorphism ϕ : F2 ! F1 such that Φ = ϕ∗.
Remark 3.5. Notice that, with the notation of Theorem 3.4, if Φ is a pullback of an
isomorphism then it is obviously effective.
4. Pell-type equations, nef and movable cones of S[2]
In this section we fix the notation on Pell-type equations and we recall how the solutions
of this kind of equations are useful to understand the geometry of the nef and movable
cones of the Hilbert squares (see Theorem 4.4).
4
Definition 4.1. The Pell-type equation Pd(m) is
x2 − dy2 = m,
where d, m are non zero integers with d > 0.
A solution (U, V ) ∈ Z2 of Pd(m) is called positive if U > 0 and V > 0, minimal if it is
positive and U is as small as possible.
Lemma 4.2 (see [Jo, Section 40, Lemma 14]). Assume d is not a square. Let (U, V ) be
the (positive) minimal solution of the equation Pd(1) and put ε := U + V √d. The integral
2 (u+v√d)
solutions of Pd(1) are obtained as integral powers of ε, in the sense that if ±εn = 1
with n ∈ Z, (u, v) is a new solution and all solutions can be obtained in this way.
Moreover, if Pd(−1) has a minimal solution (U ′, V ′), then, putting η := U ′ + V ′√d, the
integral solutions of Pd(1) are ±η2n with n ∈ Z.
Let X be a projective manifold, NS(X) := H 1,1(X)∩H 2(X, Z) is its Néron–Severi group
and TX := NS(X)⊥ ⊂ H 2(X, Z) is its transcendental lattice. The nef cone of X is defined
as the set Nef(X) of all classes α ∈ NS(X) ⊗ R with α · C ≥ 0 for all curves C ⊂ X, while
the movable cone Mov(X) is the cone generated by the movable classes (i.e. the classes of
divisors L on X such that the base locus of L has codimension ≥ 2). The nef and the
movable cones of X are convex (see [Hu, Chapter 8, Section 1] and [Ma, Section 6.5]).
Let S be a K3 surface such that NS(S) = Zh with h ample and h2 = 2e. We know
that H 2(S[2], Z) is a lattice with the Beauville–Bogomolov quadratic form qBB, and it is
naturally isometric to H 2(S, Z)⊕ Zξ (see Proposition 3.2). We denote again by h the class
induced by h in H 2(S[2], Z).
Remark 4.3. The Néron–Severi of S[2] is NS(S[2]) = Zh ⊕ Zξ.
We will see now some results on the two-dimensional vector space NS(S[2]) ⊗ R. Every
non trivial convex cone in R2 has obviously two boundary walls. Hence, if the Picard
number of S[2] is two, there are two boundary walls for every non trivial convex cone C in
NS(S[2]) ⊗ R.
The class h is nef, not ample, and spans one of the two boundary walls of the nef cone
Nef(S[2]) ⊂ NS(S[2]) ⊗ R (see [DM, Section 3.2]). The other boundary wall of Nef(S[2]) is
spanned by a class h − νSξ, where νS is a positive real number. Similarly, the boundary
walls of the movable cone Mov(S[2]) are spanned by h and h − µSξ.
The following result shows that νS and µS are rational numbers and only depend on the
positive integer e.
Theorem 4.4 (Bayer–Macrì, [BM, Section 13], or [DM, Theorem 3.4]). Let S be a K3
surface such that NS(S) = Zh with h ample and h2 = 2e. The slopes νS and µS are
respectively equal to the rational numbers νe and µe defined as follows.
• Assume that the equation P4e(5) has no solutions.
(1) If e is a perfect square, we have νe := √e and µe := √e.
(2) If e is not a perfect square and (a1, b1) is the minimal solution of the equation
Pe(1), we have νe := e b1
a1
and µe := e b1
a1
.
• Assume that the equation P4e(5) has a solution.
(1) If (a5, b5) is its minimal solution, we have νe := 2e b5
a5
and µe := e b1
a1
> νe.
5. Fourier–Mukai partners of K3 surfaces
Let S be a K3 surface. From now on if V is a sublattice of H 2(S, Z) and p, q ≥ 0 such
that p + q = 2 then V p,q := (V ⊗ C) ∩ H p,q(S). The same holds for S[2].
5
Definition 5.1. Let S, S′ be two K3 surfaces and TS, TS ′ their transcendental lattices.
We say that S and S′ are Fourier–Mukai partners (or FM partners) if there exists a Hodge
isometry ϕ : TS ! TS ′, i.e. an isometry ϕ such that ϕC(cid:0) Tp,q
Lemma 5.2. Let S, S′ be two K3 surfaces and TS, TS ′ their transcendental lattices. An
isometry ϕ : TS ! TS ′ is a Hodge isometry if and only if ϕC(cid:0)H 2,0(S)(cid:1) = H 2,0(S′).
In particular, if f : H 2(S, Z) ! H 2(S′, Z) is an isometry such that fTS : TS ! TS ′ is
a Hodge isometry, then f is a Hodge isometry.
Proof. It follows trivially from the fact that H 2,0(S) ⊥ H 0,2(S), H 1,1(S) = (H 2,0(S) ⊕
H 0,2(S))⊥ and H 2,0(S) = H 0,2(S).
S (cid:1) = Tp,q
S ′ .
(cid:3)
Remark 5.3. In Lemma 5.2, if we replace S, S′ with S[2], S′[2] respectively, where S, S′
are projective K3 surfaces, an analogous result holds.
Let S be a K3 surface with Picard number one, such that NS(S) = Zh with h ample
and h2 = 2e. Let T := TS be the transcendental lattice of S and let t be an element in T
such that AT = ht/2ei and t2 = −h2.
Remark 5.4. The only Hodge isometries ϕ : T ! T are ± id. In other words OHodge(T) =
{± id} (see [Hu, Section 3.3, Corollary 3.5]).
We define
FM(S) := { isomorphism classes [S′] : TS ′ ∼=
Hodge
T} .
The following result is well known (see [Ogu, Proposition 1.10]). We provide a proof of
this result using the glueing of lattices, since we will use the same idea in Section 6.
Proposition 5.5 (Oguiso). Let S be as above, then # FM(S) = 2p(e)−1, where p(1) = 1
and p(e), with e ≥ 2, is the number of primes q such that qe.
Proof. Let πT : T∗ ! AT, πZh : (Zh)∗ ! AZh be the projection maps. By Proposition
2.4, every even unimodular overlattice of T⊕Zh is of the form ΓI := (πT × πZh)−1(I) for
an isotropic subgroup I ⊂ AT × AZh. Note that ΓI ∼= ΛK3 as lattices, indeed they are
even, indefinite and unimodular, with signature (3, 19), see [Se, Theorem 6, pag. 54]. We
fix a Hodge structure on ΓI by Γ2,0
:= T2,0. By the surjectivity of the period map, there
I
exists a K3 surface SI such that H 2(SI , Z) ∼= ΓI as Hodge structures. By the Weak Torelli
Theorem (see [BPV, Corollary 11.2]) this surface is unique up to isomorphism.
Obviously such an SI is a FM partner of S, indeed every SI has transcendental lattice
T. Hence the problem is equivalent to counting all the even unimodular lattices Γ obtained
by the glueing of T and Zh.
We know (see Proposition 1.2) that AT ∼= AZh, moreover
AT × AZh = (cid:28) 1
2e(cid:16)t, 0(cid:17),
1
2e(cid:16)0, h(cid:17)(cid:29) .
Let I ⊂ AT × AZh be an isotropic subgroup that corresponds to an even unimodular
overlattice ΓI . The projections onto AT and AZh are isomorphisms, so there is a unique
a ∈ (Z/2eZ)∗ such that
(2)
t,
I := Ia := (cid:28)(cid:16) 1
2e
a
2e
h(cid:17)(cid:29) ⊂ AT × AZh.
Since I has to be isotropic, we have a2 ≡ 1 mod 4e.
To solve our problem we have to determine when an isotropic subgroup Ib defines a K3
surface SIb such that SIa ∼= SIb. For this purpose, we note that H 2(SIa, Z) ∼= H 2(SIb, Z)
if and only if there exists a Hodge isometry ϕ : ΓIa
! ΓIb. Note that ϕT ∈ OHodge(T) =
6
{± id} by Remark 5.4 and ϕZh ∈ O(Zh) = {± id }, thus such a Hodge isometry ϕ arises
by glueing ± idT with ± idZh (see Lemma 5.2). By Corollary 2.5, this is equivalent to either
Ia = Ib or Ia = (id,− id)(Ib), i.e. b = ±a.
It is easy to compute that #{ a ∈ Z/2eZ : a2 ≡ 1 mod 4e } = 2p(e), hence the number
of isomorphism classes of FM partners of S is 2p(e)/2 = 2p(e)−1. The computation follows
by the Chinese Remainder Theorem and the following well known facts:
(1) #((Z/2Z)∗)2 = 1,
(2) #((Z/4Z)∗)2 = 2,
(3) #((Z/2kZ)∗)2 = 4 for all k ≥ 3,
(4) #((Z/pkZ)∗)2 = 2 for all p 6= 2 and k ≥ 1,
1 . . . pkn
4eZ(cid:17)∗
(cid:16) Z
2
= (cid:16) Z
2k0Z(cid:17)∗
2 ×(cid:16) Z
1 Z(cid:17)∗
pk1
2 × ··· ×(cid:16) Z
n Z(cid:17)∗
pkn
2
where, given an abelian group H, Hn is the subgroup of the n-torsion elements. Moreover,
notice that if 4e = 2k0pk1
n is the prime decomposition of 4e then
.
(cid:3)
6. Glueing Hodge isometries
Definition 6.1. Let S be a K3 surface (not necessarily with Picard number one). We
say that S[2] is ambiguous if there exists a K3 surface S′ and an isomorphism S[2] ! S′[2]
which is not induced by any isomorphism S ! S′.
We say that S[2] is strongly ambiguous if there exists such a K3 surface S′ which is in
addition not isomorphic to S.
We want to understand when there is strong ambiguity of Hilbert squares of projective
K3 surfaces with Picard number one. For this purpose, we follow the argument of Section 5.
As before, let S be a K3 surface with Picard number one, such that NS(S) = Zh with h
ample and h2 = 2e. Let T = TS be the transcendental lattice of S and let t ∈ T such that
AT = (cid:10) 1
2e t(cid:11) and t2 = −h2. The following result of Ploog enables us to consider only the
Hilbert squares of FM partners of S to study if S[2] is strongly ambiguous.
Theorem 6.2 (see [P, Proposition 10]). Let S, S′ be projective K3 surfaces. If S[2] ∼= S′[2]
then S and S′ are FM partners.
Proof. Let f : S[2] ! S′[2] be an isomorphism. The map f ∗ : H 2(S′[2], Z) ! H 2(S[2], Z)
is a Hodge isometry. Hence f ∗ maps the Néron–Severi group of S′[2] to the Néron–Severi
group of S[2] isomorphically. By the properties of the Beauville–Bogomolov form on Hilbert
schemes (see Section 3) it follows that TS ∼= NS(S[2])⊥ and TS ′ ∼= NS(S′[2])⊥. But f ∗ is
an isometry, hence f ∗TS′ : TS ′ ! TS is a well defined Hodge isometry.
Since det(ΛK3 ⊕h−2i) = 2, the lattice H 2(S, Z)⊕ Zξ ∼= ΛK3 ⊕h−2i is not a unimodular
By Remark 4.3, we get ANS(S[2]) = AZh⊕h−2i = AZh × Ah−2i and
2e h, 0(cid:1) ,(cid:0)0, 0, 1
AT × AZh × Ah−2i = (cid:10)(cid:0) 1
Lemma 6.3. Let J ⊂ AT × AZh × Ah−2i be an isotropic subgroup which defines an even
overlattice T⊕ NS(S[2]) ֒! ΓJ with ΓJ ∼= ΛK3⊕h−2i and T ⊆ ΛK3, then #J = 2e = #AT.
Moreover, J = (cid:10)(cid:0) 1
2 ξ(cid:1)(cid:11) for suitable a ∈ Z/2eZ and z ∈ Z/2Z.
Proof. We know that #J = [ΓJ : (T⊕ NS(S[2]))], thus (see Formula 1)
dis(T⊕ NS(S[2])) = (#J)2 · dis(ΓJ ),
2e t, 0, 0(cid:1) ,(cid:0)0, 1
but dis(ΓJ ) = 2 and dis(T⊕ NS(S[2])) = dis(T)· dis(Zh)· dis(Zξ) = (−2e)· 2e· (−2) = 8e2.
Hence #J = 2e.
2 ξ(cid:1)(cid:11) .
2e h, z
2e t, a
lattice.
(cid:3)
7
! J are surjective.
We know that T ⊂ ΛK3 ֒! ΛK3 ⊕ h−2i, hence the projections Λ∗
! AT,
K3 ⊕ h−2i∗
Λ∗
It follows that also the projection pT : J ! AT is
surjective. In particular #J = #AT, so pT is an isomorphism. As AT ∼= Z/2eZ is cyclic,
also J is cyclic and it is generated by (cid:0) 1
2 ξ(cid:1) for suitable a ∈ Z/2eZ and z ∈ Z/2Z,
The isotropy condition for J as in Lemma 6.3 is −1/2e + a2/2e − z2/2 ∈ 2Z, that is
equivalent to −1 + a2 − ez2 ∈ 4eZ. Hence a2 − ez2 ≡ 1 mod 4e. We have two cases:
as in the claim.
K3 ⊕ h−2i∗
2e t, a
2e h, b
(cid:3)
We have a2 ≡ 1 mod 4e, as in Section 5.
In particular there exists a trivial
• Case z = 0
bijection
{Ja := (cid:10)(cid:0) 1
2e t, a
2e h, 0(cid:1)(cid:11)} ↔ {Ia := (cid:10)(cid:0) 1
2e t, a
2e h(cid:1)(cid:11)},
where Ia ֒! AT × AZh is as in (2).
• Case z = 1
We have a2 ≡ 1 + e mod 4e.
2e t, a
[2], Z) as Hodge
4e. We fix a Hodge structure on ΓJa by ΓJa
2,0 := T 2,0. Then ΓJa ∼= H 2(SIa
2e h, 0(cid:1)(cid:11) with a2 ≡ 1 mod
The following result will allow us to consider only the case z = 0.
2e t, a
Lemma 6.4. With the notation of Lemma 6.3, let Ja := (cid:10)(cid:0) 1
structures, where Ia := (cid:10)(cid:0) 1
2e h(cid:1)(cid:11) and SIa arises as in the proof of Proposition 5.5.
Proof. Suppose that z = 0. Let π1 : T∗ ! AT, π2 : (Zh)∗ ! AZh and π3 : h−2i∗
Ah−2i be the quotient maps. We have π−1
3 (0) = h−2i. It follows immediately that ΓJ =
(π1 × π2 × π3)−1(J) = (π1 × π2)−1(cid:0)(cid:10)(cid:0) 1
2e h(cid:1)(cid:11)(cid:1) ⊕ h−2i, where a2 ≡ 1 mod 4e. We
2e t, a
define Ia := (cid:10)(cid:0) 1
2e h(cid:1)(cid:11). As in Proposition 5.5, one can see that there exists only one
(up to isomorphism) K3 surface SIa such that H 2(SIa, Z) ∼= (π1 × π2)−1(Ia) as Hodge
structures.
Remark 6.5. A K3 surface X ∈ FM(S) is such that X ∼= SIa for a suitable Ia :=
(cid:10)(cid:0) 1
2e h(cid:1)(cid:11) with a2 ≡ 1 mod 4e, by the proof of Proposition 5.5. By Lemma 6.4 and
2e t, a
the Generalized Torelli Theorem (see Theorem 3.4), X [2] is a strongly ambiguous Hilbert
square if there exists an effective Hodge isometry between ΓJa and ΓJb such that SIa 6∼= SIb,
i.e. such that a 6= ±b (see the proof of Proposition 5.5).
2e t, a
(cid:3)
!
Now we study when there exists a Hodge isometry between H 2(SIa
[2], Z) and H 2(SIb
[2], Z)
with a 6= ±b.
we have
As OHodge(T) = {± id}, we want to find for which subgroups Ja, Jb ⊂ AT × ANS(S[2])
(± ¯id, ¯ϕ)(Ja) = Jb
for some ϕ ∈ O(NS(S[2])) and a 6= ±b. Recall that ¯ϕ means the image of ϕ by the map
O(NS(S[2])) ! O(ANS(S[2])), the same holds with T instead of NS(S[2]).
Remark 6.6 (see [GLP, Section 3.2]). If e is not a square then O(NS(S[2])) ∼= hθ, αi ×
{± id}, where, on the basis h, ξ of NS(S[2]):
eV U(cid:19) ,
θ := (cid:18) U V
α := (cid:18)1
0
0 −1(cid:19) ,
and (U, V ) is the minimal positive solution of Pe(1).
If e is a square then O(NS(S[2])) = hαi × {± id } = {±α,± id}.
A simple computation shows that ¯θ ∈ O(ANS(S[2])) is an involution.
The following result gives us a criterium to easily find some cases where there is no
strong ambiguity.
8
Lemma 6.7. Let S be a K3 surface with Picard number one, such that NS(S) = Zh with
h ample and h2 = 2e for a fixed e. If either e is a power of a prime, i.e. p(e) = 1, or e is
a square, then S[2] is not strongly ambiguous.
Proof. Suppose that e is a power of a prime. By Proposition 5.5 # FM(S) = 20 = 1, hence
all the FM partners of S are isomorphic. The claim follows by Theorem 6.2.
Suppose that e is a square. By Remark 6.6, O(NS(S[2])) = {±α,± id}. Hence
( ¯id,± ¯α)(Ja) = (cid:10)(cid:0) 1
we have a = ±b, and so, by the proof of Proposition 5.5, SIa ∼= SIb.
2e h, 0(cid:1)(cid:11) = J±a = ( ¯id,± ¯id)(Ja). Then whenever SIa
[2] ∼= SIb
2e t,± a
[2]
(cid:3)
We propose here three non trivial examples.
Example 6.8 (e = 6). Let e = 6. The minimal positive solution of P6(1) is (U, V ) = (5, 2).
With easy simplifications modulo 12 we know, by Remark 6.6, that
O(Zh ⊕ Zξ) = (cid:28)θ, α := (cid:18)1
0
0 −1(cid:19)(cid:29) × {± id} , θ := (cid:18) 5
2
12 5(cid:19) , ¯θ := (cid:18)5 2
0 5(cid:19) .
It follows that
( ¯id, ¯θ) : Ja := (cid:10)(cid:0) 1
12 t, a
12 h, 0(cid:1)(cid:11) 7! J5a := (cid:10)(cid:0) 1
12 t, 5a
12 h, 0(cid:1)(cid:11) ,
with a2 ≡ 1 mod 24. Note that (5a)2 = 25a2 ≡ a2 ≡ 1 mod 24. Moreover 5a 6≡ ±a mod
24.
Hence the 2p(6)−1 = 2 isomorphism classes of FM partners of S define Hilbert squares
that could be isomorphic, indeed ( ¯id, ¯θ) induces a Hodge isometry between their second
cohomology groups, but we do not know yet if there is an effective one.
Example 6.9 (e = 10). Let e = 10. The minimal positive solution of P10(1) is (U, V ) =
(19, 6). With easy simplifications modulo 20 we know that
O(Zh ⊕ Zξ) = (cid:28)θ, α := (cid:18)1
0
0 −1(cid:19)(cid:29) × {± id} ,
¯θ := (cid:18)−1
6
0 −1(cid:19) .
It is easy to see that
( ¯id, ¯θ) : Ja := (cid:10)(cid:0) 1
20 t, a
20 h, 0(cid:1)(cid:11) 7! J−a := (cid:10)(cid:0) 1
20 t, −a
20 h, 0(cid:1)(cid:11) ,
with a2 ≡ 1 mod 40. Hence the 2p(10)−1 = 2 isomorphism classes of FM partners define
Hilbert squares that are not isomorphic. In particular there is not strong ambiguity.
Example 6.10 (e = 15). Let e = 15. The minimal positive solution of P15(1) is (U, V ) =
(4, 1). With easy simplifications modulo 30 we know that
O(Zh ⊕ Zξ) = (cid:28)θ, α := (cid:18)1
0
0 −1(cid:19)(cid:29) × {± id} ,
¯θ := (cid:18) 4
15 4(cid:19) .
1
It is easy to see that Ja maps to either J±a or an isotropic subgroup with z = 1. Hence
there is not strong ambiguity (see Remark 6.5).
In Proposition 6.12 we give a general result on glueing Hodge isometries on T and
NS(S[2]). We need the following technical lemma.
Lemma 6.11. Let (U, V ) be the (positive) minimal solution of Pe(1). If V is even then
U 6≡ 1 mod 2e. Moreover, V is even and U ≡ −1 mod 2e if and only if Pe(−1) is solvable.
Proof. Suppose that V is even and U ≡ 1 mod 2e. Then V = 2m and U = 1 + 2ek for
suitable m, k ∈ N>0. Hence:
1 = U 2 − eV 2 = (1 + 2ek)2 − 4em2 = 1 + 4e2k2 + 4ek − 4em2,
9
which is equivalent to m2 = k(1 + ek), thus k = t2 and 1 + ek = s2 for suitable t, s ∈ N>0.
Then s2 − et2 = 1, in particular (U, V ) is not minimal: a contradiction.
Suppose now that Pe(−1) admits a minimal solution (s, t), then U = s2 + et2 and
V = 2st is even (see Lemma 4.2). Moreover s2 = −1 + et2, hence
U = s2 + et2 = −1 + 2et2 ≡ −1 mod 2e.
Conversely, suppose that V is even and U ≡ −1 mod 2e. Then V = 2m and U = −1+2ek
for suitable m, k ∈ N>0, in particular:
1 = U 2 − eV 2 = (−1 + 2ek)2 − 4em2 = 1 + 4e2k2 − 4ek − 4em2.
This is equivalent to m2 = k(ek − 1), in particular k = t2 and −1 + ek = s2 for suitable
s, t ∈ N>0. Note that s2 − et2 = −1 + ek − ek = −1, hence Pe(−1) is solvable. The claim
follows.
(cid:3)
The following result gives necessary and sufficient conditions to have non trivial Hodge
isometries between the second cohomology groups of Hilbert squares as in Lemma 6.4.
Proposition 6.12. The following are equivalent:
(1) the equation Pe(1) has a positive minimal solution (U, V ) with V even and U 6≡ −1
[2], Z) such that
(2) there exists a (glued) Hodge isometry ψ : H 2(SIa
[2], Z) ! H 2(SIb
mod 2e;
SIa 6∼= SIb (i.e. a 6= ±b), where a, b ∈ {α ∈ Z/2eZ : α2 ≡ 1 mod 4e} ⊂ (Z/2eZ)∗.
eV U(cid:19). We
Proof. Let (U, V ) be the positive minimal solution of Pe(1), and let θ := (cid:18) U V
get an isomorphism
( ¯id, ¯θ) : Ja := (cid:10)(cid:0) 1
2e t, a
2e h, 0(cid:1)(cid:11) 7! JaU := (cid:10)(cid:0) 1
2e t, aU
2e h, 0(cid:1)(cid:11) ,
[2], Z) ! H 2(SIb
Conversely, let ψ : H 2(SIa
which lifts to a Hodge isometry ψ as in the statement by Corollary 2.5 and Remark 5.3.
Moreover a 6≡ ±b := ±aU mod 4e by Lemma 6.11.
[2], Z) be a Hodge isometry such that SIa 6∼= SIb
(i.e. a 6= ±b). Then there exists an isometry θ ∈ O(NS(S[2])), θ 6= ± id. Hence (see also
Remark 6.6) there exists a (positive) minimal solution (U, V ) of Pe(1) with V even and
U 6≡ ±1 mod 2e. This proves the equivalence in the statement.
Lemma 6.13. Suppose that e is not a square and let (U, V ) be the (positive) minimal
solution of Pe(1). If e is a power of a prime then either V is odd or Pe(−1) is solvable.
Proof. Let e = pk for suitable k ∈ N odd and p 6= 2 prime. Suppose that V is even, then
(cid:3)
U 2 = 1 + pkV 2 ≡ 1 mod 2pk.
It is known that
Z
#(cid:16)(cid:0)
2pkZ(cid:1)∗(cid:17)2
Z
= #(cid:16)(cid:0)
2Z(cid:1)∗(cid:17)2 · #(cid:16)(cid:0)
Z
pkZ(cid:1)∗(cid:17)2
= 1 · 2.
It follows that U ≡ ±1 mod 2pk. By Lemma 6.11, if U ≡ 1 then V is odd, a contradiction,
hence U ≡ −1, so Pe(−1) is solvable.
Let e = 22k+1 for a suitable k ∈ N. If k = 0 (i.e. e = 2) the positive minimal solution of
P2(1) is (U, V ) = (3, 2) with V even and Pe(−1) solvable. We prove by induction that if
k > 0 then U, V are odd. First of all, if k = 1 (i.e. e = 8) then (U, V ) = (3, 1). Suppose
now that k > 0 and, by inductive hypothesis, that the positive minimal solution ( U , V )
of P22k+1(1) has U , V odd. Let (U, V ) be the minimal positive solution of P22(k+1)+1 (1).
Notice that
P22(k+1)+1(1) : x2 − 22(k+1)+1y2 = x2 − 22k+1(2y)2 = 1,
10
hence by Lemma 4.2 (U, V ) is obtained by ( U + V √22k+1)2 = U 2 + 22k+1 V 2 + 2 U V √22k+1,
i.e. (U, V ) = ( U 2 + 22k+1 V 2, U V ). By hypothesis U and V are odd, hence also U =
U 2 + 22k+1 V 2 and V = U V are odd.
(cid:3)
Remark 6.14. A necessary condition to the equivalent statements in Proposition 6.12 is,
by Lemma 6.13, that e is not a square or a power of a prime. In fact, this condition is in
Lemma 6.7.
As before, let S be a K3 surface such that NS(S) = Zh with h ample and h2 = 2e.
7. Strong ambiguity
Let T = TS be the transcendental lattice of S and let t ∈ T such that AT = (cid:10) 1
t2 = −h2.
obtained in Section 6, in order to see when S[2] is strongly ambiguous.
In this section we present some results on the effectiveness of the glued Hodge isometries
2e t(cid:11) and
[2], Z) ! H 2(SIb
[2], Z) is a Hodge isometry, where
Remark 7.1. Suppose that ψ : H 2(SIa
SIa, SIb ∈ FM(S), as in the proof of Proposition 5.5, are such that a 6= ±b, and let Ca, Cb be
[2])⊗ R generated by the ample
the ample cones (i.e. the cones in NS(SIa
[2] respectively. It follows from the Generalized Torelli Theorem that
divisors) of SIa
[2] such that f ∗ = ψ if and only if ψ(Ca) = Cb
there exists an isomorphism f : SIb
(i.e. ψ preserves the ample cones).
[2])⊗ R and NS(SIb
[2] ! SIa
[2], SIb
We know (see Theorem 4.4) that the movable cone and the ample cone of S[2] depend
on the resolvability of P4e(5).
Lemma 7.2 (see also [BCNS, Proposition 4.3]). With the notation as in Lemma 6.6, the
only non trivial isometry in O(NS(S[2])) that maps the movable cone of S[2] in itself is the
involution
β := αθ = (cid:18)1
0
0 −1(cid:19)(cid:18) U V
eV U(cid:19) = (cid:18) U
−eV −U(cid:19) ,
V
which exists only if e is not a square.
Proof. Let M ⊂ NS(S[2]) ⊗ R be the movable cone of S[2]. Notice that every isometry in
O(NS(S[2])) is of the form ±θk or ±αθk for suitable k ∈ Z. By Theorem 4.4, the movable
cone has boundary walls hR>0 and (h − µeξ)R>0, where µe := eV /U and (U, V ) is the
minimal positive solution of Pe(1).
First of all, we prove that the cone C with boundary walls (h + √eξ)R>0 and (h −
√eξ)R>0 is the union of {θk(M)}k∈Z, where θm(M)∩θn(M) is either empty or a boundary
wall. To show this claim, notice that the map θ has eigenvectors h ± √eξ and θ(C) = C.
Moreover
θ : (h − µeξ)R>0 7! hR>0,
θ : hR>0 7! (h + µeξ)R>0,
θ : (h + µeξ)R>0 7! (h + cξ)R>0,
where µe < c < √e. Indeed, if c ≤ µe then θ has a third eigenvector, a contradiction. The
claim follows by iterating the previous argument. Hence ±θk does not preserve M for all
k ∈ Z\{0}.
The lemma follows by the fact that α is the reflection with respect to h. Indeed, with
a simple computation one can see that
β : hR>0 7! (h − νeξ)R>0,
β : (h − νeξ)R>0 7! hR>0.
11
(cid:3)
The following theorem gives us necessary and sufficient conditions to have strong ambi-
guity of Hilbert squares of projective K3 surfaces with Picard number one. It is equivalent
to [DM, Proposition 3.14], see Remark 7.4.
Theorem 7.3. Let S be a K3 surface such that NS(S) = Zh with h ample and h2 = 2e.
The Hilbert square S[2] is strongly ambiguous if and only if:
(1) the Pell-type equation Pe(1) has a (positive) minimal solution (U, V ) with V even
(2) the Pell-type equation P4e(5) is not solvable;
and U 6≡ −1 mod 2e;
Proof. Let S = SIa for a suitable a ∈ (Z/2eZ)∗ such that a2 ≡ 1 mod 4e, as in the proof of
[2] is strongly ambiguous if and only if there exists
Proposition 5.5. The Hilbert square SIa
[2], Z) such that SIa 6∼= SIb (i.e. a 6= ±b) where
a Hodge isometry ψ : H 2(SIa
b ∈ (Z/2eZ)∗ and b2 ≡ 1 mod 4e, as in Proposition 6.12, and moreover ψ is effective. By
[2])) that preserves the movable cone is β := αθ.
Lemma 7.2 the only isometry in O(NS(SIa
[2] is strongly ambiguous if and only if the Hodge isometry ψ obtained by glueing
Hence SIa
id with β is effective.
[2], Z) ! H 2(SIb
We prove now that this isometry is effective if and only if P4e(5) is not solvable. If P4e(5)
is not solvable then by Theorem 4.4 the movable cone is equal to the ample cone, so ψ is
effective. Conversely, suppose that P4e(5) is solvable; then by Theorem 4.4 the boundary
walls of the ample cone are hR>0 and (h − νeξ)R>0, where νe := 2e b5
with (a5, b5) the
positive minimal solution of P4e(5) and νe < µe, in particular the ample cone is contained
in the movable cone. Notice that
a5
β : hR>0 7! (h − µeξ)R>0,
β : (h − νeξ)R>0 7! (h − cξ)R>0,
where 0 < c < µe. Suppose that 0 < c < νe, then ψ is the pullback of an isomorphism
[2] by the Generalized Torelli Theorem. But not
between the Hilbert squares Sa
every ample divisor maps to ample divisor, a contradiction. Hence νe ≤ c < µe and ψ can
not be effective.
[2] and Sb
(cid:3)
Remark 7.4. By Lemma 6.11, it is trivial that Theorem 7.3 is equivalent to [DM, Propo-
sition 3.14], but here it is proved from a different point of view.
Corollary 7.5. In Example 6.8 there is strong ambiguity, in Examples 6.9, 6.10 there is
no strong ambiguity.
Proof. The claim follows easily by Theorem 7.3. In the Example 6.9 the equation Pe(−1)
is solvable, take for instance (3, 1). In the Example 6.10 the equation Pe(1) has minimal
solution (U, V ) = (4, 1) and V is odd.
(cid:3)
8. Automorphisms of Hilbert squares
We now apply the previous algorithm to compute Aut(S[2]). The following result is
[BCNS, Theorem 1.1], but proved from another point of view.
Theorem 8.1. Let S be a K3 surface with Picard number one such that NS(S) = Zh with
h ample and h2 = 2e. The automorphism group Aut(S[2]) is either trivial or generated by
a non trivial involution. In particular Aut(S[2]) is not trivial if and only if:
(1) e is not a square;
(2) the Pell-type equation Pe(−1) is solvable;
(3) the Pell-type equation P4e(5) is not solvable.
12
Proof. Let S = SIa for a suitable a ∈ (Z/2eZ)∗ such that a2 ≡ 1 mod 4e, as in the proof
of Proposition 5.5. Then the group Aut(S[2]) is in bijection with the group
G := {ψ : H 2(SIa
[2], Z) ! H 2(SIa
[2], Z) ψ is an effective Hodge isometry}.
A necessary condition to have a non trivial ψ ∈ G is that e is not a square (see Remark
6.6). Under this hypothesis, by Lemma 7.2 the only non trivial isometry in O(NS(S[2]))
that maps the movable cone of S[2] in itself is the involution β := αθ. Let (U, V ) be the
minimal positive solution of Pe(1). We need V even, hence by Lemma 6.11 U 6≡ 1 mod 2e.
Then we have to impose U ≡ −1 mod 2e, otherwise (± ¯id, ¯β) does not preserve Ja. Again
by Lemma 6.11, U ≡ −1 mod 2e and V even is equivalent to Pe(−1) solvable. To preserve
Ja, the only possibility is ψ obtained by glueing − id with β, indeed
(− ¯id, ¯β) : Ja := (cid:28)(cid:16) 1
2e
t,
a
2e
h, 0(cid:17)(cid:29) 7! (cid:28)(cid:16)−1
2e
t, −a
2e
h, 0(cid:17)(cid:29) = Ja.
In this case, as in the proof of Theorem 7.3, ψ is effective if and only if P4e(5) is not
solvable.
(cid:3)
References
[BPV] Barth W., Peters C., Van de Ven A., Compact Complex Surfaces, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Hei-
[BM]
[Be1]
delberg (1984).
Bayer A., Macrì E., MMP for moduli of shaves on K3s via wall-crossing: nef and movable cones,
Lagrangian fibrations, Invent. Math., 198 (2014), 505–590.
Beauville A., Variétés kähleriennes dont la première classe de Chern est nulle, J. Differential
Geometry, 18 (1983), 755–782.
[BCNS] Boissière S., Cattaneo A., Nieper-Wisskirchen M., Sarti A., The automorphism group of the
Hilbert scheme of two points on a generic projective K3 surface, K3 surfaces and Their Moduli,
Springer International Publishing Switzerland, Progress in Mathematics 315 (2016), 1–15.
Cattaneo A., Automorphisms of Hilbert schemes of points on a generic projective K3 surface,
arXiv:1801.05682v2 (2018).
Debarre O., Macrì E., Unexpected
arXiv:1704.01439v1 (2017).
isomorphisms
hyperkähler
fourfolds,
between
[DM]
[C]
[GLP] Galluzzi F., Lombardo G., Peters C., Automorphs of indefinite binary quadratic forms and K3-
surfaces with Picard number 2, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Politec. Torino, Vol. 63, 1 (2010), 57–77.
[GHJ] Gross M., Huybrechts D., Joyce D., Calabi–Yau Manifolds and Related Geometries, Lectures
at a Summer School in Nordfjordeid, Norway, June 2001, Universitext, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Heidelberg (2003).
Huybrechts D., Lectures on K3 Surfaces, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 158 (2016).
Jones B. W., The arithmetic theory of quadratic forms, Carcus Monograph Series, no. 10. The
Mathematical Association of America, Buffalo, N.Y. (1950).
Markman E., A survey of Torelli and monodromy results for holomorphic-symplectic varieties,
Springer Proceedings in Mathematics, Volume 8 (2011), 257–322.
[Hu]
[Jo]
[Ma]
[MMY] Meachan C., Mongardi G., Yoshioka K., Derived equivalent Hilbert schemes of points on K3
[Na]
[Ogr]
[Ogu]
[Ok]
[P]
[Se]
Compact
hyperkähler manifolds
surfaces which are not birational, arXiv:1802.00281v1 (2018).
Nakajima H., Lecture on Hilbert Schemes of Points on Surfaces, University Lecture Series 18,
American Mathematical Society (1999).
O'Grady K.,
an
http://irma.math.unistra.fr/~pacienza/notes-ogrady.pdf.
Oguiso K., K3 surfaces via almost-primes, Mathematical Research Letters, 9 (2001), 47–63.
Okawa S., An example of birationally inequivalent projective symplectic varieties which are D-
equivalent and L-equivalent, arXiv:1801.09385v2 (2018).
Ploog D., Equivariant autoequivalences for finite group actions, Advances in Mathematics 216
(2007), 62–74.
Serre J. P., A Course in Arithmetic, Graduated texts in mathematics, 7, Springer-Verlag, New
York (1973).
introduction,
Notes
2013
-
E-mail address: [email protected]
13
|
1106.3136 | 1 | 1106 | 2011-06-16T03:26:44 | The Hirzebruch--Riemann--Roch theorem in true genus-0 quantum K-theory | [
"math.AG",
"math.SG"
] | We completely characterize genus-0 K-theoretic Gromov-Witten invariants of a compact complex algebraic manifold in terms of cohomological Gromov-Witten invariants of this manifold. This is done by applying (a virtual version of) the Kawasaki-Hirzebruch-Riemann-Roch formula for expressing holomorphic Euler characteristics of orbibundles on moduli spaces of genus-0 stable maps, analyzing the sophisticated combinatorial structure of inertia stacks of such moduli spaces, and employing various quantum Riemann--Roch formulas from "fake" (i.e. orbifold-ignorant) quantum K-theory of manifold and orbifolds (formulas, either previously known from works of Coates-Givental, Tseng, and Coates-Corti-Iritani-Tseng, or newly developed for this purpose in separate papers by Tonita). The ultimate formulation combines properties of overruled Lagrangian cones in symplectic loop spaces (the language, that has become traditional in description of generating functions of genus-0 Gromov-Witten theory) with a novel framework of "adelic characterization" of such cones. As an application, we prove that tangent spaces of the overruled Lagrangian cones of quantum K-theory carry a natural structure of modules over the algebra of finite-difference operators in Novikov's variables. As another application, we compute one of such tangent spaces for each of the complete intersections given by equations of degrees $l_1,...,l_k$ in a complex projective space of dimension $\geq l_1^2+...+l_k^2-1$. | math.AG | math |
THE HIRZEBRUCH–RIEMANN–ROCH THEOREM
IN TRUE GENUS-0 QUANTUM K-THEORY
ALEXANDER GIVENTAL1 AND VALENTIN TONITA2
completely characterize genus-0 K-theoretic
Abstract. We
Gromov–Witten invariants of a compact complex algebraic mani-
fold in terms of cohomological Gromov–Witten invariants of this
manifold. This is done by applying (a virtual version of) the
Kawasaki–Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch formula for expressing holo-
morphic Euler characteristics of orbibundles on moduli spaces of
genus-0 stable maps, analyzing the sophisticated combinatorial
structure of inertia stacks of such moduli spaces, and employing
various quantum Riemann–Roch formulas from fake (i.e. orbifold–
ignorant) quantum K-theory of manifold and orbifolds (formulas,
either previously known from works of Coates–Givental, Tseng,
and Coates–Corti–Iritani–Tseng, or newly developed for this pur-
pose by Tonita). The ultimate formulation combines properties
of overruled Lagrangian cones in symplectic loop spaces (the lan-
guage, that has become traditional in description of generating
functions of genus-0 Gromov-Witten theory) with a novel frame-
work of adelic characterization of such cones. As an application,
we prove that tangent spaces of the overruled Lagrangian cones of
quantum K-theory carry a natural structure of modules over the
algebra of finite-difference operators in Novikov’s variables. As an-
other application, we compute one of such tangent spaces for each
of the complete intersections given by equations of degrees l1, . . . , lk
in a complex projective space of dimension ≥ l2
1 + · · · + l2
k − 1.
0. Motivation
K-theoretic Gromov–Witten invariants of a compact complex alge-
braic manifold X are defined as holomorphic Euler characteristics of
various interesting vector bundles over moduli spaces of stable maps
of compact complex curves to X. They were first introduced in [9]
(albeit, in a limited generality of genus-0 curves mapped to homoge-
neous Kahler spaces), where it was shown that such invariants define
Date: June 14, 2011.
1 Partially supported by IHES.
1,2 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foun-
dation under Grant DMS-1007164.
1
2
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
on K 0(X) a geometric structure resembling Frobenius structures of
quantum cohomology theory.
At about the same time, it was shown [13] that simplest genus-0 K-
theoretic GW-invariants of the manifold X of complete flags in Cn+1
are governed by the finite-difference analogue of the quantum Toda
lattice. More precisely, a certain generating function for K-theoretic
GW-invariants, dubbed in the literature the J-function (and depend-
ing on n variables, namely, Novikov’s variables Q1, . . . , Qn introduced
to separate contributions of complex curves in X by their degrees)
turns out to be a common eigenfunction (known in representation the-
ory as Whittaker’s function) of n commuting finite-difference operators,
originating from the center of the quantized universal enveloping alge-
bra Uqsln+1. In quantum cohomology theory, the corresponding fact
was established by B. Kim [17], who showed that the cohomological
J-function of the flag manifold X = G/B of a complex simple Lie al-
′.
gebra g is a Whittaker function of the Langlands-dual Lie algebra g
The K-theoretic generalization involving quantized universal envelop-
′ was stated in [13] as a conjecture, and still remains
ing algebras Uqg
an open problem.
Foundations for K-theoretic counterpart of GW-theory were laid
down by Y.-P. Lee [19] in the reasonable generality of arbitrary com-
plex algebraic target spaces X (and holomorphic curves of arbitrary
genus). While the general structure and universal identifies (such as
the string equation, or topological recursion relations) of quantum co-
homology theory carry over to case of quantum K-theory, the latter is
still lacking certain computational tools of the former one, and for the
following reason.
The so-called divisor equations in quantum cohomology theory tell
that the number of holomorphic curves of certain degree d with an
additional constraint, that a certain marked point is to lie on a cer-
tain divisor p, is equivalent to (more precisely, differs by the factor
(p, d) from) the number of such curves without the marked point and
without the constraint. Consequently, the dependence of J-functions
on Novikov’s variables is redundant to their behavior as functions on
H 2(X) introduced through constraints at marked points. In particular,
differential equations satisfied by the J-function in Novikov’s variables
(e.g.
the Toda equations in the case of flag manifolds) are directly
related to the quantum cup-product on H ∗(X).
In K-theory, however, any analogue of the divisor equation seems
missing, and respectively the K-theoretic analogue of the quantum cup-
product, and differential equations of the Frobenius-like structure on
K 0(X) are completely detached from the way the J-functions depend
χ(M, V ) :=Xk
(−1)k dim H k(M, V ) =ZM
ch(V ) td(TM ).
HRR IN TRUE QUANTUM K-THEORY
3
on Novikov’s variables. Because of this lack of structure with respect to
Novikov’s variables, it appears even more perplexing that in examples
(such as projective spaces, or flag manifolds) the J-functions of quan-
tum K-theory turn out to satisfy interesting finite-difference equations.
The idea of computing K-theoretic GW-invariants in cohomologi-
cal terms is naturally motivated by the classical Hirzebruch–Riemann–
Roch formula [14]
The problem (which is at least a decade old) of putting this idea to work
encounters the following general difficulty. The HRR formula needs to
be applied to the base M which, being a moduli space of stable maps,
behaves as a virtual orbifold (rather than virtual manifold). The HRR
formula for orbibundles V on orbifolds M was established by Kawasaki
[16] and expresses the holomorphic Euler characteristic (which is an
integer) as an integral over the inertia orbifold IM (rather than M
itself). The latter is a disjoint union of strata corresponding to points
with various types of local symmetry (and M being one of the strata
corresponding to the trivial symmetry).
When M is a moduli space of stable maps, the strata of the inertia
stack IM parametrize stable maps with prescribed automorphisms. It
is reasonable to expect that individual contributions of such strata can
be expressed as integrals over moduli spaces of stable maps of quotient
curves, and thus in terms of traditional GW-invariants. However, the
mere combinatorics of possible symmetries of stable maps appears so
complicated (not mentioning the complexity of the integrands required
by Kawasaki’s theorem), that obtaining a “quantum HRR formula”
expressing K-theoretic GW-invariants via cohomological ones didn’t
seem feasible.
In the present paper, we give a complete solution in genus-0 to the
problem of expressing K-theoretic GW-invariants of a compact complex
algebraic manifold in terms of its cohomological GW-invariants. The
solution turned out to be technology-consuming, and we would like to
list here those developments of the last decade that made it possible.
One of them is the Quantum HRR formula [6, 3] in fake quantum
K-theory. One can take the RHS of the classical Hirzebruch–Riemann–
Roch formula for the definition of χfake(M, V ) on an orbifold M. Ap-
plying this idea systematically to moduli spaces of stable maps, one
obtains fake K-theoretic GW-invariants, whose properties are similar
to those of true ones, but the values (which are rational, rather than
4
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
integer) are different. The formula expresses fake K-theoretic GW-
invariants in terms of cohomological ones.
Another advance is the Chen–Ruan theory [1, 2] of GW-invariants of
orbifold target spaces, and the computation by Jarvis–Kimura of such
invariants in the case when the target is the quotient of a point (or
more generally a manifold) by the trivial action of a finite group.
Next is the theorem of Tseng [24] expressing twisted GW-invariants
of orbifold target spaces in terms of untwisted ones.
Yet, two more “quantum Riemann–Roch formulas” of [3] had to be
generalized to the case of orbifold targets. This is done in [21, 23].
Finally, our formulation of the Quantum HRR Theorem in true quan-
tum K-theory is based on a somewhat novel form of describing generat-
ing functions of GW-theory, which we call adelic characterization. For
a general and precise formulation of the theorem, the reader will have
to wait until Section 6, but here we would like to illustrate the result
with an example that was instrumental in shaping our understanding.
Let
J = (1 − q)Xd≥0
(1 − P q)n(1 − P q2)n · · · (1 − P qd)n .
Qd
Here P is unipotent, and stands for the Hopf bundle on CP n−1, satis-
fying the relation (1 − P )n = 0 in K 0(CP n−1). It is a power series in
Novikov’s variable Q with vector coefficients which are rational func-
tions of q, and take values in K 0(CP n−1). It was shown1 in [13] that J
represents (one value of) the true K-theoretic J-function of CP n−1.
On the other hand, one can use quantum Riemann–Roch and Lef-
schetz’ theorems of [3] and [4] to compute, starting from the coho-
mological J-function of CP n−1, a value of the J-function of the fake
quantum K-theory. The result (see Section 10) turns out to be the
same: J. This sounds paradoxical, since — one can check this directly
for CP 1 in low degrees! — contributions of non-trivial Kawasaki strata
neither vanish no cancel out.
In fact this is not a contradiction, for as it turns out, coefficients
of the series J do encode fake K-theoretic GW-invariants, when J is
expanded into a Laurent series near the pole q = 1. Furthermore,
when J is expanded into a Laurent series near the pole q = ζ −1, where
ζ is a primitive m-th root of unity, the coefficients represent certain
fake K-theoretic GW-invariants of the orbifold target space CP n−1/Zm.
Moreover, according to our main result, these properties altogether
1Using birational invariance of holomorphic Euler characteristcs replacing certain
moduli spaces of stable maps to CP n−1 with toric compactifications.
HRR IN TRUE QUANTUM K-THEORY
5
completely characterize those Q-series (whose coefficients are vector-
valued rational functions of q) which represent true genus-0 K-theoretic
GW-invariants of a given target manifold.
This fact is indeed the result of application of Kawasaki’s HRR for-
mula to moduli spaces of stable maps. Namely, the complicated com-
binatorics of strata of the inertia stacks can be interpreted as a certain
identity which, recursively in degrees, governs the decomposition of the
J-function into the sum of elementary fractions of q with poles at all
roots of unity. The theorem is stated in Section 6 (after the general
notations, properties of quantum K-theory, Kawasaki’s HRR formula,
and results of fake quantum K-theory are described in Sections 1–5),
and proved in Sections 7 and 8.
In Section 10, we develop a technology that allows one to extract con-
crete results from this abstract characterization of quantum K-theory.
In particular, we prove (independently of [13]) that the function J is in-
deed the J-function of CP n−1, as well as similar results for codimension-
k complete intersections of degrees l1, . . . , lk satisfying l2
k ≤ n.
Let qQ∂Q denote the operator of translation through log q of the vari-
1 + · · · + l2
able log Q. It turns out that for every s ∈ Z,
(cid:0)P qQ∂Q(cid:1)s
J = (1 − q)P sXd≥0
Qdqsd
(1 − P q)n(1 − P q2)n · · · (1 − P qd)n
also represent genus-0 K-theoretic GW-invariants of CP n−1. This ex-
ample illustrates a general theorem of Section 9, according to which
J-functions of quantum K-theory are organized into modules over the
algebra Dq of finite-difference operators in Novikov’s variables. This
turns out to be a consequence of our adelic characterization of quantum
K-theory in terms of quantum cohomology theory, and of the D-module
structure (and hence of the divisor equation) present in quantum co-
homology theory.
1. K-theoretic Gromov–Witten invariants
Let X be a target space, which we assume to be a nonsingular com-
X,d
plex projective variety. Let M
g,n denote Kontsevich’s moduli space of
degree-d stable maps to X of complex genus-g curves with n marked
X,d
points. Denote by L1, . . . , Ln the line (orbi)bundles over M
g,n formed
by the cotangent lines to the curves at the respective marked points.
When a1, . . . , an ∈ K 0(X), and d1, . . . , dn ∈ Z, we use the correlator
notation
ha1Ld1, . . . , anLdniX,d
g,n
6
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
for the holomorphic Euler characteristic over M
sheaf:
X,d
g,n of the following
ev∗
n(an)Ldn
n ⊗ Øvir.
1(a1)Ld1
1 . . . ev∗
X,d
g,n → X are the evaluation maps, and Øvir is the virtual
Here evi : M
structure sheaf of the moduli spaces of stable maps. The sheaf Øvir was
introduced by Yuan-Pin Lee [19]. It is an element of the Grothendieck
X,d
group of coherent sheaves on the stack M
g,n , and plays a role in K-
theoretic version of GW-theory of X pretty much similar to the role of
X,d
g,n ]vir in cohomological GW-theory of
the virtual fundamental cycle [M
X. According to [19], the collection of virtual structure sheaves on the
X,d
spaces M
g,n satisfies K-theoretic counterparts of Kontsevich–Manin’s
axioms [18] for Gromov–Witten invariants.
Note that, in contrast with cohomological GW-theory, where the in-
variants are rational numbers, K-theoretic GW-invariants are integers.
The following generating function for K-theoretic GW-invariants is
called the genus-0 descendant potential of X:
F :=Xn,d
Qd
n!
ht(L), . . . , t(L)iX,d
0,n .
Here Qd denotes the monomial in the Novikov ring, the formal series
completion of the semigroup ring of the Mori cone of X, where the
monomial represents the degree d of rational curves in X, and t stands
for any Laurent polynomial of one variable, L, with vector coefficients
in K 0(X). Thus, F is a formal function of t with Taylor coefficients in
the Novikov ring.
2. The symplectic loop space formalism
Let C[[Q]] be the Novikov ring. Introduce the loop space
K :=(cid:2)K 0(X) ⊗ C(q, q−1)(cid:3) ⊗ C[[Q]].
By definition, elements of K are Q-series whose coefficients are vector-
valued rational functions on the complex circle with the coordinate
q. It is a C[[Q]]-module, but we often suppress Novikov’s variables in
our notation and refer to K as a linear “space.” Moreover, abusing
notation, we write K = K(q, q−1), where K = K 0(X) ⊗ C[[Q]]. We call
elements of K “rational functions of q with coefficients in K,” meaning
that they are rational functions in the Q-adic sense, i.e. modulo any
power of the maximal ideal in the Novikov ring.
HRR IN TRUE QUANTUM K-THEORY
7
We endow K with symplectic form Ω, which is a C[[Q]]-valued non-
degenerate anti-symmetric bilinear form:
K ∋ f, g 7→ Ω(f, g) = [Resq=0 + Resq=∞] (cid:0)f (q), g(q−1)(cid:1) dq
Here (·, ·) stands for the K-theoretic intersection pairing on K:
.
q
(a, b) := χ(X; a ⊗ b) =ZX
td(TX ) ch(a) ch(b).
It is immediate to check that the following subspaces in K are La-
grangian and form a Lagrangian polarization, K = K+ ⊕ K−:
K+ = K[q, q−1], K− = {f ∈ K f (0) 6= ∞, f (∞) = 0} ,
i.e. K+ is the space of Laurent polynomials in q, and K− consists of
rational functions vanishing at q = ∞ and regular at q = 0.
The following generating function for K-theoretic GW-invariants is
defined as a map K+ → K and is nick-named the big J-function of X:
J (t) := (1 − q) + t(q) +Xa
ΦaXn,d
Qd
n!
h
Φa
1 − qL
, t(L), . . . , t(L)iX,d
0,n+1.
The first summand, 1−q, is called the dilaton shift, the second, t(q), the
input, and the sum of the two lies in K+. The remaining part consists
of GW-invariants, with {Φa} and {Φa} being any Poincare-dual bases
of K 0(X). It is a formal vector-valued function of t ∈ K+ with Taylor
coefficients in K−.
Indeed, the moduli space M
X,d
0,n+1 is a “virtual orbifold” of finite
dimension. In particular, in the K-ring of it, the line bundle L1 satisfies
a polynomial equation, P (L1) = 0, with P (0) 6= 0.2 This implies that
each correlator tends to 0 as q → ∞, and therefore the correlator is a
reduced rational function, with the denominator P (q), and it obviously
has no pole at q = 0.
Proposition. The big J-function coincides with the differential of
the genus-0 descendant potential, considered as the section of the cotan-
gent bundle T ∗K+ which is identified with the symplectic loop space
by the Lagrangian polarization K = K+ ⊕ K− and the dilaton shift
f 7→ f + (1 − q):
J (t) = 1 − q + t(q) + dtF .
2On a manifold of complex dimension < D we would have: (L − 1)D = 0, i.e. L
would be unipotent. This may be false on an orbifold, as the minimal polynomial
of a line bundle can vanish at roots of 1, but it does not vanish at 0 since L−1
exists.
8
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
Proof. To verify the claim, we compute the symplectic inner prod-
uct of the K−-part of J (t), with a variation, δt ∈ K+, of the input, and
show that it is equal to the value of the differential dtF on δt. Note
that, since δt has no poles other than q = 0 or ∞, we have
Φa
Φa ⊗
, δt! = −Ω δt,Xa
Ω Xa
− [Resq=0 + Resq=∞] Pa δta(q)Φa
1 − q−1L
1 − qL
dq
q
Φa ⊗
Φa
1 − qL! =
= Resq=L
δt(q)
q − L
= δt(L).
Therefore the symplectic inner product in question is equal to
Qd
n!
Xn,d
as claimed.
hδt(L), t(L), . . . , t(L)iX,d
0,n+1 = (dtF )(δt),
3. Overruled Lagrangian cones
A Lagrangian variety, L, in the symplectic loop space (K, Ω) is called
an overruled Lagrangian cone if L is a cone with the vertex at the origin,
and if for every regular point of L, the tangent space, T , is tangent to
L along the whole subspace (1 − q)T . In particular: (i) tangent spaces
are invariant with respect to multiplication by q − 1, (ii) the subspaces
(q − 1)T lie in L (so that L is ruled by a finite-parametric family of
such subspaces), and (iii) the tangent spaces at all regular points in a
ruling subspace (q − 1)T are the same and equal to T .
Theorem ([12]). The range of the big J-function J of quantum K-
theory of X is a formal germ at J (0) of an overruled Lagrangian cone.
Proof. As explained in [12], this is a consequence of the relation
between descendants and ancestors.
The ancestor correlators of quantum K-theory
K 0(X) ∋ τ 7→ ha1 ¯Ld1, . . . , an ¯LdniX,d
g,n (τ ),
are defined as formal power series of holomorphic Euler characteristics
X,d
g,n+l; Øvir ev∗
1(a1) ¯Ld1
1 · · · ev∗
n(an) ¯Ldn
n ev∗
n+1(τ ) · · · ev∗
∞Xl=0
1
l!
χ(cid:16)M
n+l(τ )(cid:17) ,
where ¯Li, the “ancestor” bundles, are pull-backs of the universal cotan-
gent line bundles Li on the Deligne-Mumford space Mg,n by the con-
X,d
traction map ct : M
g,n+l → Mg,n. The latter map involves forgetting
the map of holomorphic curves to the target space as well as the last l
marked points.
HRR IN TRUE QUANTUM K-THEORY
9
The genus-0 ancestor potential is defined by
F τ :=Xn,d
Qd
n!
h¯t( ¯L), . . . , ¯t( ¯L)iX,d
0,n (τ )
and depends on ¯t and τ . The graph of its differential is identified in
terms of the ancestor version of the big J-function:
J = 1 − q + ¯t(q) +Xa,b
Here(cid:0)Gab(cid:1) = (Gab)−1, and
ΦaGab(τ )Xn,d
Gab(τ ) := (Φa, Φb) +Xn,d
Qd
n!
h
Φb
1 − q ¯L
, ¯t( ¯L), . . . , ¯t( ¯L)iX,d
0,n+1(τ ).
Qd
n!
hΦa, τ, . . . , τ, ΦbiX,d
0,2+n.
In the ancestor version of the symplectic loop space formalism, the loop
space and its polarization K = K+ ⊕ K− are the same as in the theory
of descendants, but the symplectic form Ωτ is based on the pairing
tensor (Gab) rather than the constant Poincare pairing (Φa, Φb).
Let L ⊂ (K, Ω) and Lτ ⊂ (K, Ωτ ) be Lagrangian submanifolds de-
fined by the descendant and ancestor J-functions J and J . Then
Lτ = Sτ L,
where Sτ : K → Kτ is an isomorphism of the symplectic loop spaces,
defined by the following matrix Sτ = (Sa
b ):
Sa
b = δa
b +Xl,d
Qd
l! Xµ
gaµhΦµ, τ, . . . , τ,
Φb
1 − qL
iX,d
0,2+n.
It is important that the genus-0 Deligne-Mumford spaces M0,n are
manifolds (of dimension n − 3). Consequently, the line bundles ¯Li are
unipotent. Moreover, at the points ¯t ∈ K+ with ¯t(1) = 0 the ancestor
potential F τ has all partial derivatives of order < 3 equal to 0.
In
geometric terms, the cone Lτ is tangent to K+ along (1 − q)K+. This
means that the cone L is swept by ruling subspaces (1 − q)S−1
τ K+
parametrized by τ ∈ K, an that each Lagrangian subspace Sτ K+ is
tangent to L along the corresponding ruling subspace. The theorem
follows.
The proof of the relationship L = Sτ L is based on comparison of the
bundles Li and ¯Li, and is quite similar to the proof of the corresponding
cohomological theorem given in Appendix 2 of [5].
It uses the K-
theoretic version of the WDVV-identity introduced in [9], as well as
the string and dilaton equations.
10
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
The genus-0 dilaton equation can be derived from the geometric fact
(ft1)∗(1 − L1) = 2 − n about the K-theoretic push-forward along the
X,d
map ft1 : M
0,n forgetting the first marked point. It leads
to the relation
X,d
0,n+1 → M
h1 − L, t(L), . . . , t(L)iX,d
0,n+1 = (2 − n)ht(L), . . . , t(L)iX,d
0,n .
The latter translates into the degree-2 homogeneity of F with respect
to the dilaton-shifted origin, and respectively to the conical property
of L.
The string equation is derived from (ft1)∗1 = 1 (thanks to rationality
of the fibers of the forgetting map) and relationships between ft∗
1(Li)
and Li for i > 1 (see for instance [9]). It can be stated as the tangency
to the cone L of the linear vector field in K defined by the operator of
multiplication by 1/(1 − q). The operator of multiplication by
1
1 − q
−
1
2
=
1
2
1 + q
1 − q
is anti-symmetric with respect to Ω and thus defines a linear Hamilton-
ian vector field. Since L is a cone, this vector field is also tangent to L,
which lies therefore on the zero level of its quadratic Hamilton function.
This gives another, Hamilton-Jacobi form of the string equation.
4. Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch formula for orbifolds
Given a compact complex manifold M equipped with a holomorphic
vector bundle E, the Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch formula [14] provides
a cohomological expression for the super-dimension (i.e. Euler charac-
teristic) of the sheaf cohomology:
χ(M, E) := dim H •(M, E) =ZM
td(TM ) ch(E).
The generalization of this formula to the case when M is an orbifold
and E an orbibundle is due to T. Kawasaki [16]. It expresses χ(M, E)
as an integral over the inertia orbifold IM of M:
χ(M, E) =Z[IM ]
td(TIM ) ch(cid:18) Tr(E)
Tr(V• N ∗
IM )(cid:19) .
By definition, the structure of an n-dimensional complex orbifold on
M is given by an atlas of local charts U → U/G(x), the quotients
of neighborhoods of the origin in Cn by (linear) actions of finite local
symmetry groups (one group G(x) for each point x ∈ M).
By definition, charts on the inertia orbifold IM have the form U g →
U g/Zg(x), where U g is the fixed point locus of g ∈ G(x), and Zg(x) is
HRR IN TRUE QUANTUM K-THEORY
11
the centralizer of g in G(x). For elements g from the same conjugacy
class, the charts are canonically identified by the action of G(x). Thus,
locally near x ∈ M, connected components of the inertia orbifold are
labeled by conjugacy classes, [g], in G(x). Integration over the funda-
mental class [IM] involves the division by the order of the stabilizer of
a typical point in U g (and hence by the order of g at least).
Near a point (x, [g]) ∈ IM, the tangent and normal orbibundles
TIM and NIM are identified with the tangent bundle to U g and normal
bundle to U g in U respectively.
orbibundle E on M. By V• N ∗
The Kawasaki’s formula makes use of the obvious lift to IM of the
IM , we denoted the K-theoretic Euler
class of NIM , i.e. the exterior algebra of the dual bundle, considered
as a Z2-graded bundle (the “Koszul complex”).
The fiber F of an orbibundle on IM at a point (x, [g]) carries the
direct decomposition into the sum of eigenspaces Fλ of g. By Tr(F ) we
denote the trace bundle3, the virtual orbibundle
χfake(M, E) :=ZM
td(TM ) ch(E).
We call it the fake holomorphic Euler characteristic of E. It is gener-
ally speaking a rational number, while the “true” holomorphic Euler
characteristic χ(M, E) is an integer.
Note that the right hand side of Kawasaki’s formula is the fake holo-
IM )),
morphic Euler characteristic of an orbibundle, Tr(E)/ Tr(V•(N ∗
on the inertia orbifold.
3In fact, super-trace, if the bundle is Z2-graded.
Tr(F ) :=Xλ
λFλ.
The denominator in Kawasaki’s formula is invertible because g does
not have eigenvalue 1 on the normal bundle to its fixed point locus.
Finally, td and ch denote the Todd class and Chern character.
Lefschetz’ holomorphic fixed point formula for super-traces in the sum
When M is a global quotient, fM/G, of a manifold by a finite group,
and E is a G-equivariant bundle over fM , Kawasaki’s result reduces to
χ(M, E) = dim H •(fM , E)G =
tr(cid:16)g H •(fM , E)(cid:17) .
1
GXg∈G
The orbifold M is contained in its inertia orbifold IM as the compo-
nent corresponding to the identity elements of local symmetry groups.
The corresponding term of Kawasaki’s formula is
12
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
Our goal in this paper is to use Kawasaki’s formula for expressing
genus-0 K-theoretic GW-invariants in terms of cohomological ones. We
refer to [22] (see also the thesis [21]) for the virtual version of Kawasaki’s
theorem, which justifies application of the formula to moduli spaces of
stable maps.
The moduli spaces of stable maps are stacks, i.e.
locally are quo-
tients of spaces by finite groups. The local symmetry groups G(x)
are automorphism groups of stable maps. A point in the inertia stack
X,d
0,n is specified by a pair: a stable map to the target space and an
IM
automorphism of the map. In a sense, a component of the inertia stack
parametrizes stable maps with prescribed symmetry.
The components themselves are moduli spaces naturally equipped
with virtual fundamental cycles and virtual structure sheaves. In fact,
they are glued from moduli spaces of stable maps of smaller degrees
— quotients of symmetric stable maps by the symmetries. Thus the
individual integrals of Kawasaki’s formula can be set up as certain
invariants of fake quantum K-theory, i.e. fake holomorphic Euler char-
acteristics of certain orbibundles on spaces glued from usual moduli
spaces of stable maps.
Our plan is to identify these invariants in terms of conventional
ones and express them — and thereby the “true” genus-0 K-theoretic
Gromov-Witten theory — in terms of cohomological GW-invariants.
For this, a summary of relevant results about fake quantum K-
theory, including the Quantum Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch Theorem
of Coates–Givental [3, 6], will be necessary.
5. The fake quantum K-theory
Fake K-theoretic GW-invariants are defined by
ha1Ld1, . . . , anLdniX,d
g,n :=
ZhM
g,n ivir td(cid:16)TM
X,d
X,d
g,n(cid:17) ch(cid:0)ev∗
1(a1)Ld1
1 . . . ev∗
n(an)Ldn
n (cid:1) ,
i.e. as cohomological GW-invariants involving the Todd class of the
virtual tangent bundle to the moduli spaces of stable maps.
The Chern characters ch(Li) are unipotent, and as a result, generat-
ing function for the fake invariants are defined on the space of formal
power series of L − 1. In particular, the big J-function
J fake := 1 − q + t(q) +Xa
ΦaXn,d
Qd
n!
h
Φa
1 − qL
, t(L), . . . , t(L)iX,d
0,n+1
The symplectic form is defined by
Kfake :=(cid:26) Q-series whose coefficients
are Laurent series in q − 1 (cid:27) .
Ωfake(f, g) := − Resq=1(cid:0)f (q), g(q−1)(cid:1) dq
q
.
HRR IN TRUE QUANTUM K-THEORY
13
takes an input t4 from the space Kfake
q − 1 with vector coefficients, and takes values in the loop space
+ = K[[q − 1]] of power series in
Expand 1/(1 − qL) into a series of powers of L − 1:
1
1 − qL
=Xk≥0
(L − 1)k
qk
(1 − q)k+1 .
According to [6], we obtain a Darboux basis:
Φa(q − 1)k, Φaqk/(1 − q)k+1, a = 1, . . . , dim K 0(X), k = 0, 1, 2, . . .
Taking Kfake
− to be spanned over K by qk/(1 − q)k+1, we obtain a La-
grangian polarization of (Kfake, Ωfake). As before, the big J-function co-
incides, up to the dilaton shift 1 − q, with the graph of the differential
of the genus-0 descendant potential: J fake(t) = 1 − q + t(q) + dtF fake.
The range of the function J fake forms (a formal germ at J(0) of) an
overruled Lagrangian cone, Lfake. The proof is based on the relationship
[12] between gravitational descendants and ancestors of fake quantum
K-theory, which looks identical to the one in “true” K-theory (although
the values of fake and true GW-invariants disagree).
In fact the whole setup for fake GW-invariants can be made purely
topological, extended to include K 1(X), and moreover, generalized to
all complex-orientable extraordinary cohomology theories (i.e. complex
cobordisms).
In this generality, the quantum Hirzebruch–Riemann–
Roch theorem of [3, 6] expresses the fake GW-invariants (of all genera)
in terms of the cohomological gravitational descendants. The special
case we need is stated below, after a summary of the symplectic loop
space formalism of quantum cohomology theory.
Take H = H even(X) ⊗ Q[[Q]], and (a, b)H = RX ab. Let H denote
the space of power Q-series whose coefficients are Laurent series in one
4Note that we still treat our generating functions as formal in t. In particular,
an input here a series in q − 1 whose coefficients can be arbitrary as long as they
remain ”small”. In practice they will be the sums of indeterminates (like t, which
are small in their own, t-adic topology) with constants taken from the maximal
ideal of Novikov’s ring (and thus small in the Q-adic sense).
14
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
indeterminate, z. Abusing notation we write: H = H((z)), (remem-
bering that elements of H are Laurent series only modulo any power
of Q). Define in H the symplectic form
ΩH(f, g) = Resz=0 (f (−z), g(z))H dz,
and Lagrangian polarization
H+ = H[[z]], H− = z−1H[z−1].
Using Poincare-dual bases of H, and the notation ψ = c1(L), we define
the big J-function of cohomological GW-theory
J H = −z + t(z) +Xa
φaXn,d
Qd
n!
h
φa
−z − ψ
, t(ψ), . . . , t(ψ)iX,d
0,n+1
It takes inputs t from H+, takes values5 in H, and coincides with the
graph of differential of the cohomological genus-0 descendant potential,
F H, subject to the dilaton shift −z: J H (t) = −z − t(z) + dtF H. Here
Qd
n!
ht(ψ), . . . , t(ψ)iX,d
0,n ,
F H :=Xn,d
0,n :=ZhM
where for ai ∈ H and di ≥ 0, we have:
ha1ψd1, . . . , anψdn
n iX,d
0,n+1i ev∗
X,d
1(a1)c1(L1)d1 · · · ev∗
n(an)c1(Ln)dn.
The range of the function J H is a Lagrangian cone, LH ⊂ H, overruled
in the sense that its tangent spaces, T , are tangent to LH along zT (see
Appendix 2 in [5]).
Theorem ([6], see details in [3]). Denote by △ the Euler–Maclaurin
asymptotic of the infinite product
△ ∼
YChern roots x of TX
∞Yr=1
x − rz
1 − e−x+rz .
Identify Kf ake with H using the Chern character isomorphism ch : K →
H and ch(q) = ez. Then Lfake is obtained from LH by the pointwise
multiplication on H by △:
ch(cid:0) Lfake(cid:1) = △ LH.
5The previous footnote about fake K-theory applies here too. In particular, for
the formal function, to assume values in H merely means that the coefficients of it
as a formal t-series become Laurent series in z when reduced modulo a power of Q.
HRR IN TRUE QUANTUM K-THEORY
15
Remarks. (1) Given a function x 7→ s(x), the Euler–Maclaurin
r=1 es(x−rz) is obtained by the formal procedure:
asymptotics ofQ∞
s(x − rz) = ∞Xr=1
∞Xr=1
e−rz∂x! s(x) =
∞Xk=1
s(x)
−
+
2
s(−1)(x)
=
z
z∂x
ez∂x − 1
(z∂x)−1s(x)
B2k
(2k)!
s(2k−1)(x)z2k−1,
where s(k) = dks/dxk, s(−1) is the anti-derivative R x
0 s(ξ)dξ, and B2k
are Bernoulli numbers. Taking es(x) to be the Todd series, x/(1 − e−x),
and summing over the Chern roots x of the tangent bundle TX , we get:
where the coefficients sl hide another occurrence of Bernoulli numbers:
△ =
1
ptd(TX)
ePl≥0 slxl/l!
exp(Xk≥0Xl≥0
s2k−1+l
B2k
(2k)!
chl(TX)z2k−1) ,
=
x
1 − e−x = 1 +
x
2
+
B2l
(2l)!
x2l.
∞Xl=1
(2) Note that neither ch : K → H nor △ : H → H is symplectic: the
former because (a, b)fake = (ch(a), td(TX ) ch(b))H 6= (ch(a), ch(b))H,
the latter because of the factor td(TX )−1/2. However the composition
ch−1 ◦△ : H → Kfake is symplectic.
(3) The transformation between cohomological and K-theoretic J-
functions (or descendant potentials) encrypted by the theorem, involves
three aspects. One is the transformation △, while the other two are
the changes of the polarization and dilaton shift. Namely, ch−1 : H →
Kfake maps H+ to K+ but does not map H− to Kfake
− , and there is a
discrepancy between the dilaton shifts: ch−1(−z) = log q−1 6= 1 − q.
(4) Since Lfake is an overruled cone, it is invariant under the multipli-
cation by the ratio (1 − q)/ log q−1. This shows one way of correcting
for the discrepancy in dilaton shifts.
(5) The proof of the theorem does not exploit any properties of over-
ruled cones. One uses the family tdǫ(x) := ǫx/(1 − e−ǫx) of “extraordi-
nary” Todd classes to interpolate between cohomology and K-theory,
and establishes an infinitesimal version of the theorem. For this, the
twisting classes tdǫ(TM
) of the moduli spaces are expressed in terms
of the descendant classes by applying the Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch
formula to the fibrations ftn+1 : M
X,d
g,n+1 → M
X,d
g,n .
X,d
g,n
We refer for all details to the dissertation [3]. However, in Section
8, we indicate geometric origins of the three changes described by the
16
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
theorem: the change in the position of the cone, in the dilaton shift,
and in the polarization.
6. Adelic characterization of quantum K-theory
Recall that point f ∈ K is a series in the Novikov variables, Q,
with vector coefficients which are rational functions of q±1. For each
ζ 6= 0, ∞, we expand (coefficients of) f in a Laurent series in 1 − qζ
and thus obtain the localization fζ near q = ζ −1. Note that for ζ = 1,
the localization lies in the loop space Kfake of fake quantum K-theory.
The main result of the present paper is the following theorem, which
provides a complete characterization of the true quantum K-theory in
terms of the fake one.
Theorem. Let L ⊂ K be the overruled Lagrangian cone of quantum
K-theory of a target space X. If f ∈ L, then the following conditions
are satisfied:
(i) f has no pole at q = ζ −1 6= 0, ∞ unless ζ is a root of 1.
(ii) When ζ = 1, the localization fζ lies in Lfake.
In particular, the localization J (0)1 at ζ = 1 of the value of the J-
function with the input t = 0 lies in Lfake. In the tangent space to Lfake
at the point J (0)1, make the change q 7→ qm, Qd 7→ Qmd, and denote by
T the resulting subspace in Kfake. Let ∇ζ denote the Euler–Maclaurin
asymptotics as qζ → 1 of the infinite product:
∇ζ ∼qζ→1
YK-theoretic Chern
roots P of T ∗
X
r=1(1 − qmrP )
r=1(1 − qrP )
.
Q∞
Q∞
(iii) If ζ 6= 1 be a primitive m-th root of 1, then(cid:0)∇−1
Conversely, if f ∈ K satisfies conditions (i),(ii),(iii), then f ∈ L.
ζ fζ(cid:1) (q/ζ) ∈ T .
Remarks. (1) The cone L is a formal germ at J (0). The statements
(direct and converse) about “points” f ∈ L are to be interpreted in the
spirit of formal geometry: as statements about families based at J (0).
(2) K-theoretic Chern roots P are characterized by ch(P ) = e−x
where x are cohomological Chern roots of TX .
(3) After the substitution qζ = ez the infinite product becomes
YChern roots x
m−1Yk=1
(1 − ζ −kekze−x+mrz)−1.
∞Yr=0
HRR IN TRUE QUANTUM K-THEORY
17
The Euler–Maclaurin expansion has the form
where s also depends on z as a parameter:
log ∇ζ =
+
s
2
s(−1)
mz
+Xk>0
m−1Yk=1
s(x, z) = − logYx
B2k
(2k)!
(mz)2k−1s(2k−1),
(1 − ζ −kekze−x).
Note that since x are nilpotent, s(x, z) is polynomial in x with coeffi-
cients which expand into power series of z. The scalar factor of ∇ζ is
es(0,0)/2 = m− dim X/2 since for each of dim X Chern roots,
lim
x→0
(1 − ζ −ke−x) = lim
x→0
1 − e−mx
1 − e−x = m.
m−1Yk=1
(4) The (admittedly clumsy) definition of subspace T can be clarified
as follows. The tangent space to Lfake at the point J (0)1 is the range
of the linear map S−1 : Kfake
+ → Kfake, where S−1 is a matrix Laurent
series in q − 1 with coefficients in the Novikov ring (see Section 3).
+ .
Let eS be obtained from S by the change q 7→ qm, Qd 7→ Qmd. Then
T := eS−1Kfake
(5) The condition (iii) seems ineffective, since it refers to a tangent
space to the cone Lfake at a yet unknown point J (0)1. However, we will
see later that the three conditions together allow one, at least in princi-
ple, to compute the values J (t) for any input t, assuming that the cone
Lfake is known, in a procedure recursive on degrees of stable maps. In
particular, this applies to J(0)1. The cone Lfake, in its turn, is expressed
through LH, thanks to the quantum HRR theorem of the previous sec-
tion, by a procedure which in principle has a similar recursive nature.
Altogether, our theorem expresses all genus-0 K-theoretic gravitational
descendants in terms of the cohomological ones. Thus this result in-
deed qualifies for the name: the Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem of
true genus-0 quantum K-theory.
We describe here a more geometric (and more abstract) formulation
of the theorem using the adelic version of the symplectic loop space
formalism.
For each ζ 6= 0, ∞, let Kζ be the space of power Q-series with vector
Laurent series in 1 − qζ as coefficients. Define the symplectic form
Ωζ (f, g) = − Resq=ζ −1(cid:0)f (q), g(q−1)(cid:1) dq
q
,
Kζ
bK ⊂ Yζ6=0,∞
consisting of collections fζ ∈ Kζ such that, modulo any power of
Novikov’s variables, fζ ∈ K+ for all but finitely many values of ζ.
The adele space is equipped with the product symplectic form:
bΩ(f, g) = −X Resq=ζ −1(cid:0)fζ(q), gζ(q−1)(cid:1) dq
q
.
Next, there is a map K → bK : f 7→ bf , which to a rational function
of q±1 assigns the collection (fζ) of its localizations at q = ζ −1 6= 0, ∞.
Due to the residue theorem, the map is symplectic:
Ω(f, g) =bΩ(bf ,bg).
Given a collection Lζ ⊂ (Kζ, Ωζ) of overruled Lagrangian cones such
that modulo any power of Novikov’s variables, Lζ = Kζ
+ for all but
adelic overruled Lagrangian cone in the adele symplectic space.
finitely many values of ζ, the product Qζ6=0,∞ Lζ ⊂ bK becomes an
In fact, “overruled” implies invariance of tangent spaces under mul-
tiplication by 1 − q. Since 1 − q is invertible at q = ζ −1 6= 1, all Lζ with
ζ 6= 1 must be linear subspaces.
According to the theorem, the imageb L ⊂ bK of the cone L ⊂ K under
the mapb : K → bK followed by a suitable adelic (pointwise) completion,
is an adelic overruled Lagrangian cone:
18
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
and put Kζ
the Cartesian product:
+ := K[[1 − qζ]]. The adele space is defined as the subset in
Lζ,
b L = Yζ6=0,∞
where Lζ = Kζ
+ unless ζ is a root of 1, Lζ = Lfake when ζ = 1, and
Lζ = ∇ζT ζ when ζ 6= 1 is a root of 1, T ζ ⊂ Kζ being obtained from
the subspace T ⊂ Kfake (described in the theorem) by the isomorphism
Kfake → Kζ induced by the change q 7→ qζ.
Corollary. Two points f, g ∈ L lie in the same ruling space of L
if and only if their expansions f1, g1 near q = 1 lie in the same ruling
space of Lfake.
Proof. If f1, g1 lie in the same ruling space of Lfake, then ǫbf + (1 −
ǫ)bg ∈ bL for each value of ǫ, and therefore, by the theorem, the whole
line ǫf +(1−ǫ)g lies in L. The converse is, of course, also true: if the line
through f, g lies in L then the line through f1, g1 lies in Lfake. It remains
to notice that ruling spaces of L or Lfake are maximal linear subspaces
HRR IN TRUE QUANTUM K-THEORY
19
of these cones (because this is true modulo Novikov’s variables, i.e. in
the classical K-theory). (cid:4)
7. Applying Kawasaki’s formula
Here we begin our proof of the theorem formulated in the previous
section. The big J-function (see Section 2) consists of the dilaton shift
1−q, the input t(q), and holomorphic Euler characteristics of bundles on
X,d
virtual orbifolds M
0,n+1. The Euler characteristics can be expressed,
by applying Kawasaki’s formula, as sums of fake holomorphic Euler
X,d
characteristics over various strata of the inertia stacks IM
0,n+1. A
point in the inertia stack is represented by a stable map with symmetry
(an automorphism, possibly trivial one). A stratum is singled out by
the combinatorics of such a curve with symmetry. Figure 1 below is
our book-keeping device for cataloging all the strata.
dilaton
shift
input
(1−q) + t(q) +
horns
legs
1
1−qL
head
arms
marked
points
+
ζ
1
1−qL1/m ζ
tail
roots of 1
stem
Figure 1
Let’s call what’s written in a given seat of a correlator the content
of that seat. In the J-function, the content of the first marked point
has the factor 1/(1 − qL). We call this marked point the horn.
20
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
Given a stable map with symmetry, we focus out attention on the
horn. The symmetry preserves the marked point and acts on the
cotangent line at this point with an eigenvalue, which we denote ζ.
In Figure 1, contributions of strata with ζ = 1 are separated from
those where ζ 6= 1, in which case ζ is a primitive root of 1 of certain
order m 6= 1.
When ζ = 1, the symmetry is trivial on the irreducible component
of the curve carrying the horn. In the curve, we single out the max-
imal connected subcurve containing the horn on which the symmetry
is trivial, and call this subcurve (and the restriction to it of the stable
map) the head.
The heads themselves are stable maps without symmetry, and are
X,d′
parametrized by moduli spaces M
0,n′+1. Apart from the horn, the
n′ marked points are either marked points of the whole curve or the
nodes where “arms” are attached. An arm a stable map obtained as a
connected component of what’s left of the original curve when the head
is removed. The arm has its own horn — the nodal point where it is
attached to the head. An arm can be any stable map with symmetry,
with the only restriction: at its horn, the eigenvalue of the symmetry
6= 1 (because otherwise the head could be increased).
In Figure 1, contributions of the strata with the eigenvalues ζ 6= 1
are appended into the sumP. If g denotes the symmetry of the stable
map, and ζ is a primitive mth root of 1, then gm acts trivially on the
component carrying the horn. We single out the maximal connected
subcurve on which gm is trivial. Then the restriction of the stable map
to it has g as a symmetry of order m. We call the quotient stable map
(of the quotient curve) the stem. We’ll come back soon to a detailed
discussion of “legs” and “tails” attached to the stems.
Let us denote by L the universal cotangent line (on the moduli space
of stems) at the horn. The content in the fake holomorphic Euler
characteristic represented by this term in the sum P has the factor
1/(1 − qL1/mζ). Indeed, if L′ denotes the universal cotangent line to
the original stable map, restricted to the stratum in question, then (in
the notation of Kawasaki’s formula in Section 4) ch(Tr L′) = ζec1(L)/m.
Note that c1(L) is nilpotent on each of the stem or head spaces. Thus,
Figure 1 provides the decomposition of J into the Laurent polynomial
part 1 − q + t(q) and elementary fractions 1/(1 − qζ)r at different poles
q = ζ −1 6= 0, ∞. We are ready for our first conclusion.
Proposition 1. The localization Jζ at ζ = 1 lies in the cone Lfake
of fake quantum K-theory.
HRR IN TRUE QUANTUM K-THEORY
21
with ζ 6= 1. Note that in genus 0, stable maps of degree 0 have no
Proof. Denote by et(q) the sum of t(q) and of all the terms of P
non-trivial automorphisms. So all terms of the sumP have non-zero
et makes sense as a q-series lying in Kfake
value of J-function of this fake theory with the inputet.
degrees. This shows that (thanks to Novikov’s variables) the whole sum
+ , and is “small” in the (t, Q)-
adic sense, hence qualifying on the role of an input of fake quantum
K-theory of X. We claim that the whole sum shown on Figure 1 is the
Indeed, examine contributions into the virtual Kawasaki formula [22]
of the terms with ζ = 1. Denote by L− the cotangent line at a marked
point of the head. When the marked point of the head is that of the
original curve, the content of it is t(L−). When this is a node where
an arm is attached, denote by L+ the cotangent line to the arm. The
only ingredients that do not factor into separate contributions of the
head and of the arms are
Pa Φa ⊗ Φa
1 − L− Tr(L′
+)
.
The top comes from the gluing of the arm to the head, and the bottom
from the smoothing of the curve at the node, as a mode of perturbation
normal to the stratum of the inertia orbifold. We conclude that the
Thus J (t) is represented as
content of the marked point of the head correlator is exactlyet(L−).
1 − q +et(q) +Xa
0,n′+1 = J fake(et),
,et(L), . . . ,et(L)iX,d′
since the correlators come from the fake K-theory of X. (cid:4)
ΦaXn′,d′
Qd′
n′!
1 − qL
Φa
h
Let us return to the term with ζ 6= 1. The stem curve itself is
typically the quotient of CP 1 by the rotation through ζ about two
points: the horn and one more — let’s call it the butt — where the
eigenvalue of the symmetry on the cotangent line is ζ −1. In fact the
stem can degenerate into the quotient of a chain of several copies of
CP 1, with the same action of the symmetry on each of them, and
connected “butt-to-horn” to each other (and even further, with other
irreducible components attached on the “side” of the chain, see Figure
2 in the next section). In this case the butt of the stem is that of the
last component of the chain. The butt can be a regular point of the
whole curve, a marked point of it, or a node where the tail is attached
(see Figure 1). The tail can be any stable map with any symmetry,
except that at the point where it is attached to the stem, the eigenvalue
of the symmetry cannot be equal to ζ. (Otherwise the stem chain could
22
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
be prolonged.) In Figure 1, put δt(q) = 1 − q + t(q) + t(q), where t(q) is
the sum of all remaining terms except the one with the pole at q = ζ −1
(with this particular value of ζ). We claim that the expansion Jζ of
the big J-function near q = ζ −1 has the form
δt(q)+Xa
ΦaXn,d
Qmd
n! (cid:20)
Φa
1 − qL1/mζ
, T (L), . . . , T (L), δt(L1/m/ζ)(cid:21)X,d
0,n+2
,
where [. . . ] are certain correlators of “stem” theory, and T (L) are leg
contributions, both yet to be identified.
+ ζ). This is because ch(Tr L′
Indeed, let L+ denote the cotangent line at the butt of the stem, and
L′
+ its counterpart on the m-fold cover. When the butt is a marked
point, its content is t(L1/m
+ ζ), and when it is the node with a tail
attached, then it is t(L1/m
+) = ζec1(L+)/m.
The case when the butt is a regular point on the original curve but a
marked point on the stem, can be compared to the case when the butt
is a marked point on the original curve as well.
In the former case,
the conormal bundle to the stratum of stable maps with symmetry is
missing, comparing to the latter case, the line L′
In other words,
one can replace the former contribution with the latter one, by taking
the content at the butt to be 1 − L1/m
+ ζ, i.e. the K-theoretic Euler
factor corresponding to the conormal line bundle L′
+. We summarize
our findings.
+.
Proposition 2. The expansion Jζ of J near q = ζ −1 is a tangent
vector to the range of the fake J-function of the “stem” theory at the
“leg” point, T .
Our next goal is to understand leg contributions T (L).
puted when the input t = 0. Then
Proposition 3. Let eT (L) denote the arm contribution et(L) com-
T (L) = Ψm(cid:16)eT (L)(cid:17) .
We remind that Adams’ operations Ψm are additive and multiplica-
tive endomorphisms of K-theory acting on a line bundle by Ψm(L) =
Lm. In this proposition, Ψm acts not only on L and elements of K 0(X),
but also by Ψm(Qd) = Qmd on Novikov’s variables.
Proof. The legs of a stable map with an automorphism, g, of order
m 6= 1 on the cotangent line at the horn, are obtained by removing the
stem (and the tail). Each leg shown in Figure 1 represents m copies of
the same stable map glued to the m-fold cover of the stem and cyclically
HRR IN TRUE QUANTUM K-THEORY
23
permuted by g. The automorphism gm preserves each copy of the leg
but acts non-trivially on the cotangent line at the horn of the leg (i.e.
the point of gluing), since otherwise the stem could be extended. The
only other restriction on what a leg could be is that it cannot carry (or
be) a marked point of the original curve, since the numbering of the m
copies of the marked point would break the symmetry. This identifies
each of the m copies of a leg with an arm carrying no marked points.
+ the cotangent
lines at the point of gluing to the m-fold cover of the stem and to the
leg respectively. Then the smoothing perturbation at the node of the
curve with symmetry represents a direction normal to the stratum of
symmetric curves. In the denominator of the virtual Kawasaki formula
[22], it is represented by one Euler factor 1 − L− Tr(L′
+) for each copy
of the leg. As in the case of arms, the gluing factor has the form
As in the proof of Proposition 1, denote by L− and L′
.
+)
1 − L− Tr(L′
Pa Φa ⊗ Φa
+)(cid:1) are integrated out over the moduli space
Then ch(Φa) and ch(cid:0)Tr(L′
of legs, and the leg contributes into the fake Euler characteristics over
the space of stems through Φa and L−. We claim however that the
contribution of the gluing factor into the stem correlator has the form
Ψm(Φa) ⊗ Φa
1 − Lm
− Tr(L′
+)
.
This follows from the following general lemma.
Lemma. Let V be a vector bundle, and g the automorphism of V ⊗m
acting by the cyclic permutation of the factors. Then
Tr(g V ⊗m) = Ψm(V ).
We conclude that the contribution of the leg into stem correlators is
obtained fromet(L−) (the contribution of the arm into head correlators)
by computing it at the input t = 0 (this eliminates those arms that
carry marked points), then applying Ψm, and also replacing Qd with
Qmd, because the total degree of the m copies of a leg is m times the
degree of each copy. (cid:4)
Proof of Lemma. It suffices to prove it for the universal UN -bundle,
or equivalently, for the vector representation V = CN of UN . Comput-
ing the value at h ∈ UN of the character of Tr(g V ⊗m), considered as
a representation of UN , we find that it is equal to tr(gh⊗m), because
g and h⊗m commute. Let ei denote eigenvectors of h with eigenvalues
24
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
xi. A column of the matrix of gh⊗m in the basis ei1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ eiN has zero
diagonal entry unless i1 = · · · = iN . Thus, tr(gh⊗N ) = xm
1 + · · · + xm
N .
This is the same as the trace of h on Ψm(V ). (cid:4)
Remark. The lemma can be taken for the definition of Adams’ op-
erations. For a permutation g with r cycles of lengths m1, . . . , mr, it
implies:
Tr(g V ⊗m) = Ψm1(V ) ⊗ · · · ⊗ Ψmr (V ).
Proposition 4. Propositions 1,2,3 unambiguously determine the
big J-function J in terms of stem and head correlators.
Proof. Figure 1 can be viewed as a recursion relation that recon-
structs J(t) by induction on degrees d of Novikov’s monomials Qd (in
the sense of the natural partial ordering on the Mori cone). The key
fact is that in genus 0, constant stable maps have no non-trivial auto-
morphisms (and have > 2 marked or singular points). Consequently,
arms which are not marked points, as well as legs, or stems with no
legs attached, must have non-zero degrees. As a result, setting t = 0,
one can reconstruct J (0) up to degree d from head and stem correla-
tors, assuming that tails and arms are known in degrees < d, and then
projections J(0)1 and J(0)ζ to Kf ake
and Kζ
+
reconstruct the arm eT (q) and tail δt(q) (at t = 0) up to degree d from
It is essential here that even when the head has degree 0, it suffices
to know the arms up to degree < d (since at least 2 arms must be
attached to the head). Also, when both the stem and the tail have
degree 0, and there is only one leg attached, Proposition 3 recovers the
information about the leg up to degree d from that of the arm up to
degree d/m < d.
+ respectively.
The previous procedure reconstructs eT (the arm at t = 0), and hence
the leg T = Ψm(eT ) in all degrees. Now, starting with any (non-zero)
input t, one can first determineet up to degree d from stem correlators,
assuming that tails are known in degrees < d, and then recover J (t)
(and hence arms and tails) up to degree d. (cid:4)
Thus, to complete the proof of the theorem, it remains to show that
the tangent spaces from Proposition 2 coincide with the Lagrangian
spaces Lζ = ∇ζT ζ described in the adelic formulation of the theorem.
This will be done in the next section.
8. Stems as stable maps to X/Zm
Let ζ 6= 1 be a primitive mth root of 1, and let M
X,d
0,n+2(ζ) denote a
stem space. It is formed by stems of degree d, considered as quotient
HRR IN TRUE QUANTUM K-THEORY
25
maps by the symmetry of order m acting by ζ on the cotangent line at
X,md
0,mn+2.
the horn of the covering curve. It is a Kawasaki stratum in M
Proposition 5. The stem space M
X,d
0,n+2(ζ) is naturally identified
X/Zm,d
0,n+2 (g, 1, . . . , 1, g−1) of stable maps to the
with the moduli space M
orbifold X/Zm.
Remark. This Proposition refers to the GW-theory of orbifold target
spaces in the sense of Chen–Ruan [2] and Abramovich–Graber–Vistoli
[1].
In particular, evaluations at marked points take values in the
inertia orbifold, and notation of the moduli space indicates the sectors,
i.e. components of the inertia orbifold where the evaluation maps land.
In the case at hands the inertia orbifold is X × Zm, and the string
(g, 1, . . . , 1, g−1), where g is the generator of Zm, designates (in a way
independent of ζ) the sectors of the marked points.
Proof. The paper [15] by Jarvis–Kimura describes stable maps to
the orbifold point/Zm = BZm in a way that can be easily adjusted
to our case X/Zm = X × BZm. Namely, they are stable maps to X
equipped with a principal Zm-cover over the complement to the set of
marked and nodal points, possibly ramified over these points in a way
balanced at the nodes (i.e. such that the holonomies around the node
on the two branches of the curve are inverse to each other). The stem
space is obtained when two marked points are assigned holonomies g±1
of maximal order, and all other marked points are unramified. (cid:4)
Thus,
introducing the simplifying notation M := M
X,d
0,n+2(ζ), we
identify stem correlators in the virtual Kawasaki formula [22] with in-
tegrals:
h
Φ
1 − qζL1/m ,T (L), . . . , T (L), δt(L) iX,d
Z[M]vir
td(TM) chev∗
1 Φ ev∗
(1 − qζL1/m
1
=
0,n+2
,
n+2 δt(ζ −1L1/m
i T (Li)
i=2 ev∗
n+2) Qn+1
) Tr(cid:16)V• N ∗
M(cid:17)
Here [M]vir is the virtual fundamental cycle of the moduli space in
GW-theory of X/Zm, TM is the virtual tangent bundle to M, and NM
is the normal bundle to M considered as a Kawasaki stratum in the
appropriate moduli space of stable maps to X which are the m-fold
covers of the stems. In several steps, we will express stem correlators
in terms of cohomological GW-theory of X.
26
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
Let (H, Ω) be the symplectic loop space of cohomological GW-theory
of X:
H = H((z)), Ω(f, g) = Resz=0(f (−z), g(z)) dz,
(A, B) =ZX
AB.
, t(ψ), . . . , t(ψ)iX,d
0,n+1.
Recall that the J-function of this theory is
J H
X (t) := −z + t(z) +Xa
φaXn,d
Qd
n!
h
φa
−z − ψ
Consider now two generating functions for GW-invariants of X/Zm:
J H
X/Zm(t) := −z + t(z) +Xa
φaXn,d
Qd
n!
h
eφa
−z − ψ
, t(ψ), . . . , t(ψ)iX/Zm,d
0,n+1
and δJ H
X/Zm
:=
Qd
n!
h
−z − ψ
geφa
φaXn,d
, t(ψ), . . . , t(ψ), g−1δt(ψ)iX/Zm,d
0,n+2 .
δt(z) +Xa
are assumed to come from the identity sector. Here eφa form a basis
The factors g±1 indicate the appropriate sectors, while the inputs t(ψ)
dual to φa with respect to the Poincare pairing A, B 7→ (A, B)/m.
Proposition 6. J H
X/Zm(t) = J H
X (t), and
δJ H
X/Zm = δt(z) +Xa
φaXn,d
h
φa
−z − ψ
, t(ψ), . . . , t(ψ), δt(ψ)iX,d
0,n+2.
Proof: This follows directly from results of Jarvis–Kimura [15].
Remark. In fact the overruled Lagrangian cone of genus-0 GW-
theory on X/Zm is the Cartesian product of m copies of LH
X corre-
sponding to characters of Zm. The J-function J H
represents points
on the diagonal of this product. At such a point, the tangent space
to the whole product decomposes into the direct sum of m subspaces
X) according to sectors (i.e. elements of Zm). The
(copies of TJ H
vectors δJ H
lie in one of these tangent subspaces, namely the one
corresponding to the sector g ∈ Zm.
LH
X/Zm
X/Zm
X
The sum TM ⊕ NM is the restriction to M of the virtual tangent
bundle to the moduli space of stable maps of degree md with mn + 2
marked points. According to [3], in the Grothendieck group K 0(M),
HRR IN TRUE QUANTUM K-THEORY
27
this tangent bundle is represented by push-forward from the universal
,
where L stands for the universal cotangent line at the “current” (mn +
familyeπ : eC → M:6
3-rd) marked point of the universal curve,ei : eZ → eC is the embed-
eπ∗ ev∗ TX +eπ∗(1 − L−1) +(cid:16)−eπ∗ei∗OeZ(cid:17)∨
ding of the nodal locus, and ∨ means dualization. This decomposes
the virtual bundle into the sum of three parts, respectively responsible
for: (i) deformations of maps to X of a fixed complex curve, (ii) defor-
mations of complex structure and/or configuration of marked points,
and (iii) bifurcations of the curve’s combinatorics through smoothing
at the nodes.
Part (i) is the index bundle
Ind(TX ) :=eπ∗eev∗(TX).
Here we use the following notation: maps π : C → M and ev : C →
Zm-covers.
We need to extract from the index bundle the eigenspace of the
generator, g, of the group Zm, with the eigenvalue ζ −k. For this, we
begin with the Zm-module C where g acts by ζ k, denote Cζ k the cor-
X/Zm form the universal stable map diagram, while eπ : eC → M and
eev : eC → X are their Zm-equivariant lifts to the family of ramified
responding line bundle over BZm, and take(cid:0)Ind(TX) ⊗ Cζ k(cid:1)Zm. This
X/Zm = X × BZm as π∗ ev∗(cid:0)TX ⊗ Cζ k(cid:1). Namely, as we mentioned
in Section 4, the K-theoretic push-forward operation on global quo-
tients considered as orbifolds automatically extracts the invariant part
of sheaf cohomology. Thus,
(trivial) result can be expressed in terms of orbifold GW-theory of
Tr(Ind(TX)) = ⊕m−1
k=0 ζ −kπ∗ ev∗(cid:0)TX ⊗ Cζ k(cid:1) .
Recall that an invertible characteristic class of complex vector bun-
dles is determined by an invertible formal series in one variable, the
1st Chern class x = c1(l) of the universal line bundle. Alongside the
usual Todd class td, we introduce moving Todd classes (aka equivariant
K-theoretic inverse Euler classes), one for each λ 6= 1:
x
1
td(l) =
tdλ(l) =
1 − e−x ,
1 − λe−x .
6In [3], we have TX − 1 in place of TX , buteπ∗1 = 0 in genus 0.
28
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
The contribution of Tr(Ind(TX )) into our integral over M reads:
(*)
td (π∗ ev∗(TX))
m−1Yk=1
tdζ k(cid:0)π∗ ev∗(TX ⊗ Cζ k)(cid:1) .
X/Zm and δJ tw
X/Zm as twisted counterparts of J H
Introduce J tw
X/Zm and
δJ H
X/Zm. Namely, following [5], one defines GW-invariants twisted by a
chosen bundle, E, over the target space, and a chosen multiplicative
characteristic class, S, by systematically replacing virtual fundamental
cycles of moduli spaces of stable maps with their cap-products (such
as [M]vir ∩ S(Ind(E)) in our case) with the chosen characteristic class
of the corresponding index bundle.
Proposition 7. Denote by (cid:3) and (cid:3)ζ the Euler–Maclaurin asymp-
totics of the infinite products
(cid:3) ∼
(cid:3)ζ ∼
YChern roots x of TX
YChern roots x of TX
∞Yr=1
∞Yr=1
x − rz
1 − e−mx+mrz
x − rz
1 − ζ −re−x+rz/m .
X/Zm lies in the overruled Lagrangian cone (cid:3) LH
Then J tw
lies in the transformed tangent space (cid:3)ζT(cid:3)−1J tw
LH
X.
X/Zm
X, and δJ tw
X/Zm
Proof. The Quantum Riemann–Roch Theorem of [5], which ex-
presses twisted GW-invariants in terms of untwisted ones, was gener-
alized to the case of orbifold target spaces by Hsian-Hua Tseng [24].
The proposition is obtained by direct applications of the Quantum RR
Theorem of [24] to each of the twisting data E = TX ⊗ Cζ k, S = tdζ k.
For k = 0, the Euler–Maclaurin asymptotics (for both J tw and δJ tw)
come from the product
and for k 6= 0, from
for J tw, and
x − rz
1 − e−x+rz ,
1
1 − ζ −ke−x+rz
∞Yr=1
∞Yr=1
∞Yr=1
1
1 − ζ −ke−x+rz+kz/m
HRR IN TRUE QUANTUM K-THEORY
29
for δJ tw. Multiplying out the products over k = 0, . . . , m − 1, and
k=0 (1 − ζ −ku) = 1 − um and ζ m = 1 to simplify, we obtain the
usingQm−1
required results. (cid:4)
Part (ii) of the bundle TM ⊕ NM comes from deformations of the
complex structure and marked points. It can be described as the K-
theoretic push-forwardeπ∗(1−L−1) along the universal curveeπ : eC → M
(think of H 1(Σ, TΣ)). To express the trace Tr of it, one need to consider
push-forwards of L−1 ⊗ Cζ k and appropriately twisted GW-invariants
of the orbifold X/Zm. More precisely, we need the twisting classes to
have the form:
td(cid:0)π∗(1 − L−1)(cid:1) m−1Yk=1
tdζ k(cid:0)π∗[(1 − L−1) ev∗(Cζ k)](cid:1) .
The general problem of computing GW-invariants of orbifolds twisted
by characteristic classes of the form
Yα
Sα(cid:0)π∗[(L−1 − 1) ev∗(Eα)](cid:1)
is solved in [23] (see also Chapter 2 of thesis [21]). The answer is
described as the change of the dilaton shift.7 Namely, if −z = c1(L−1),
and Sα denote the twisting multiplicative characteristic class, then the
dilaton shift changes from −z to −zQα Sα(L−1Eα). In our situation,
α = 0, . . . , m − 1, S0 = td−1, Sk = td−1
ζ
Respectively, the new dilaton shift is
for k 6= 0, and Ek = Cζ k.
−z
(1 − ez)
(−z)
m−1Yk=1
(1 − ζ kez) = 1 − emz.
Thus, the dilaton shift changes from −z to 1 − emz.
Parts (i) and (ii) together form the part of the virtual tangent bun-
md,X
dle to M
0,mn+2 (albeit restricted to M) logarithmic with respect to the
nodal divisor. What remains is part (iii), supported on the nodal divi-
sor, which consists of one-dimensional summands (one per node), the
smoothing mode of the glued curve at the node. Contributions of part
M) in the virtual Kawasaki for-
mula is described in terms of yet another kind of twisted GW-invariants
of the orbifold X/Zm, where the twisting classes are supported at the
nodal locus. The effect of such twisting on GW-invariants can be found
by a recursive procedure based on ungluing the curves at the nodes. As
it is seen in [3], this does not change the overruled Lagrangian cones,
(iii) into the ratio td(TM)/ ch(TrV•(N ∗
7 Generalizing the case of manifold target spaces discussed in [3].
30
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
but affects generating functions through a change of polarization. Re-
ferring to [23] (or [21]) for the generalization to orbifold target spaces
needed here, we state the results.
Let M denote a moduli space of stable maps to the orbifold X/Zm,
and π : C → M the projection of the universal family of such stable
maps. Let Z = ∪h∈ZmZh be the decomposition of the nodal stratum
Z ⊂ C into the disjoint union according to the ramification type of
the node, and i : Zh → C denote the embedding. Let Sh,a be invert-
ible multiplicative characteristic classes, and Eh,α arbitrary orbibundles
over X/Zm, where h ∈ Zm, α = 1, . . . , Kh. The twisting in question is
obtained by systematically including into the integrands of GW-theory
of X/Zm the factors
Yh∈Zm
KhYα=1
Sh,α (π∗[i∗OZh ⊗ ev∗ Eh,α]) .
According to the results of [23] (Theorem 1.10.3 in [21]), the effect of
such twisting is completely accounted by a change of polarization in
the symplectic loop space of GW-theory of X/Zm, described separately
for each sector. Namely, for the sector corresponding to h ∈ Zm, define
a power series uh(z) = z + a2z2 + a3z3 + · · · by
z
uh(z)
=
KhYα=1
S−1
h.a (Eh,a ⊗ L) , where c1(L) := z.
Define the Laurent series vh,k, k = 0, 1, 2, . . . , by
1
uh(−ψ − z)
=Xk≥0
(uh(ψ))k vh,k(z),
which is the expansion of the L.H.S. in the region ψ < z. Then, as
one can check, φazk, φavh,k(z), a = 1, . . . , dim H, k = 0, 1, 2, . . . , form
a (topological) Darboux basis in the sector h of the symplectic loop
spaces of the GW-theory of X/Zm. The genus-0 descendant potential
of the twisted theory is expressed from that of untwisted one by taking
the overruled Lagrangian cone of the untwisted theory for the graph
of differential of a function in the Lagrangian polarization associated
with this basis. Note that the positive space polarization, which is
spanned by {φazk}, stays the same as in the untwisted theory, while
the negative space, which is spanned by {φavh,k(z)}, differs from that
of untwisted theory, which is spanned by {φaz−1−k}.
Remarks. (1) The standard polarization H± of the symplectic loop
space of quantum cohomology theory of a manifold is obtained by the
HRR IN TRUE QUANTUM K-THEORY
31
same formalism:
1
−ψ − z
=Xk≥0
ψk
(−z)k+1 ,
and H− is spanned by φa(−z)−1−k, k = 0, 1, 2, . . . .
(2) As it was mentioned in Section 5, in fake K-theory one obtains
a Darboux basis from z/u(z) = td(L), and respectively the expansion:
1
1 − eψ+z =Xk≥0
(eψ − 1)k
ekz
(1 − ez)k+1 .
Consequently, Kfake
and Φaqk/(1 − q)k+1, a = 1, . . . , dim K, k = 0, 1, 2, . . . .
are spanned respectively by Φa(q − 1)k
+
and Kfake
−
In stem theory, there are two types of nodes (Figure 2). When a
stem acquires an unramified node (as shown in the top picture), the
covering curve carries a Zm-symmetric m-tuple of nodes. The smooth-
ing bundle has dimension m and carries a regular representation of
Zm. When a stem degenerates into a chain of two components glued
at a balanced ramification point of order m (the bottom picture), the
smoothing mode is one-dimensional and carries the trivial represen-
tation of Zm. Contributions of these smoothing modes into the ratio
M) is accounted by the following twisting factors in
the integrals over M, considered as orbifold-theoretic GW-invariants:
td(TM)/ ch(TrV•(N ∗
td(cid:0)−π∗i∗OZg(cid:1)∨ td (−π∗i∗OZ1)∨
m−1Yk=1
tdζ k(cid:0)−π∗(ev∗ Cζ k ⊗ i∗OZ1)(cid:1)∨ ,
where Z1 stands for the unramified nodal locus, and Zg for the ramified
one. This twisting results in the change of polarizations.
In the g-
ramified sector, the new polarization is determined from the expansion
of
1
1 − e(psi+z)/m =
1
1 − q1/mL1/m .
Here the factor 1/m occurs because what was denoted L in the GW-
theory of X/Zm is the universal cotangent line at the ramification point
to the quotient curve, which is L1/m in our earlier notations of stem
spaces (where L stands for the universal cotangent line to the covering
curve). In the unramified sector, the new polarization is found from
z
u(z)
= td(L)
m−1Yk=1
tdζ k(Cζ k ⊗ L) =
z
1 − e−z
m−1Yk=1
1
1 − ζ ke−z =
z
1 − e−mz ,
32
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
and consequently the expansion of
1
1 − emψ+mz =
1
1 − qmLm .
We conclude that the negative space of polarizations in the ramified
and unramified sectors are spanned respectively by
Φaqk/m/(1−q1/m)k+1 and Φaqmk/(1−qm)k+1 = Φa Ψm(cid:0)qk/(1 − q)k+1(cid:1) .
Remark. The occurrence of Adams’ operation Ψm here is not sur-
prising. The smoothing modes at m cyclically permuted copes on an
unramified node of the stem curve form an m-dimensional space car-
rying the regular representation of Zm. The trace Tr of the bundle
formed by these modes is, according to Lemma of the previous section,
Ψm(L− ⊗ L+) (in notation of Figure 2, the top picture).
_
L
L
+
horn
stem
butt
L
_
L +
Figure 2
It remains to apply the above results to those generating functions
of stem theory which occur in the virtual Kawasaki formula. Introduce
a generating function, δJ st
, of stem theory as the image under the
Chern character map ch : Kfake → H of
X/Zm
Φa
1 − q1/mL1/m , T (L), . . . , T (L), δt(L1/m)(cid:21)X,d
0,n+2
.
δt(q1/m) +Xa,n,d
Φa
Qd
n! (cid:20)
Replacing q1/m with ζq and Qd with Qmd, we would obtain the sum
of correlators of stem theory as they appeared in Section 7. On the
other hand, the interpretation of stem correlators as GW-invariants
of X/Zm twisted in three different ways (corresponding to parts (i),
(ii), (iii) of the tangent space), and the previous results on the effects
of these twistings, provide the following description of δJ stX/Zm in
terms of GW-theory of X.
HRR IN TRUE QUANTUM K-THEORY
33
Proposition 8. δJ st
X/Zm
(δt, T ) lies in (cid:3)ζ (cid:3)−1TJ tw
input T is related to the application point J tw
along the negative space of the polarization of the unramified sector:
(cid:3) LH
X , where the
X/Zm by the projection [· · · ]+
X/Zm
ch (1 − qm + T (q)) =(cid:2)J tw
X/Zm(cid:3)+
.
X/Zm
X/Zm
X/Zm
, being obtained from δJ tw
Proof. According to Proposition 7, J tw
X/Zm lies in the cone (cid:3) LH,
lies in the space (cid:3)ζ (cid:3)−1T , where T is the tangent space to
and δJ tw
(cid:3) LH at the point J tw
. It follows from the previous discussion that
δJ st
by changing dilaton shift and
polarizations only, lies in the same space. Changing the content of the
horn in the definition of δJ tw
to φa/(1 − ez/m+ψ/m) is equivalent to applying to the same space the
polarization associated with the g-ramified sector. However, the new
dilaton shift and polarization in the unramified sector both affect the
way the input T of δJ st
. Namely,
ch(T ) = [J tw
fromeφa/(−z −ψ) = φa/(−z/m−ψ/m)
is computed in terms of J tw
X/Zm]+ − (1 − emz). (cid:4)
X/Zm
X/Zm
X/Zm
X/Zm
To put the next proposition into a context, let us recall that the stem
correlators of Section 7, in order to represent the expansion J (t)ζ of
the true K-theoretic J-function J at q = ζ −1, need to be computed at
a specific input T , the leg, which is characterized in a rather complex
way. Namely, the expansion J (0)1 of the value of J at the input t = 0
lies in the cone Lfake of fake quantum K-theory of X (Proposition 1).
The contribution eT , i.e. the arm corresponding to t = 0, is obtained as
the input point of J (0)1, i.e. by applying the projection (. . . )+ along
the negative space of polarization (described in Example 2) and the
dilaton shift of fake quantum K-theory:
1 − q + eT (q) = (J (0)1)+ .
also on q and Q).
X/Zm in terms of the tangent space TJ tw
According to Proposition 3, T = Ψm(eT ) (where Adams’ operation acts
On the other hand, Proposition 7 locates the stem generating func-
X . Furthermore,
X =
tion δJ st
according to the Quantum HRR Theorem stated in Section 5, LH
△−1 ch(cid:0) Lfake(cid:1), and hence the cone and its tangent space in question
are the images under (cid:3)△−1 ch of Lfake and of a certain tangent space
to it. The following proposition implies that when the input T is the
leg, the the requisite tangent space is exactly TJ (0)1 Lfake.
(cid:3) LH
X/Zm
34
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
Proposition 9. ch−1((cid:3) LH
X ) = Ψm( Lfake), where the Adams opera-
tion Ψm : Kfake → Kfake acts on q by Ψm(q) := qm.
Proof. From the QHRR theorem of Section 5 and Proposition 7,
we have:
△−1 ch(J fake
X ) = J H
X = (cid:3)−1J tw
X/Zm.
We intentionally neglect to specify the arguments, since they are de-
termined by the argument, t, of J H
X , by polarizations, and by the
transformations △ and (cid:3) themselves. The Adams operation Ψm acts
on cohomology classes via the Chern isomorphism:
The J-function J H
X has degree 2 with respect to the grading, defined by
deg z = 2, deg Qd = 2Rd c1(TX), and the usual grading in cohomology.
Therefore, writing J H
m−1Ψm(J H
JdQd = e−(log m) c1(TX )/zJ H
X .
ch(cid:0)Ψm(ch−1 a)(cid:1) = mdeg(a)/2a.
X /(−z) =Pd JdQd, we find
X ) =Xd
m− deg Qd
The last equality is an instance of the genus-0 divisor equation (see [5]).
Thus, Proposition 9 would follow from the identity
(cid:3) = m
1
2 dimC X Ψm(△) e−(log m) c1(TX )/z.
To establish it, note that both △ and (cid:3) are the Euler–Maclaurin
asymptotics of infinite products
YChern roots x of TX
S(x − rz),
∞Yr=1
where S is respectively
x
1 − e−x
and
x
1 − e−mx = m−1 Ψm(cid:18) x
1 − e−x(cid:19) .
1
The factor m−1 contributes into the asymptotics in the form
(cid:4)
X/Zm
δJ st
2 dimC X.
Corollary.
e−(log m) x/zm1/2 = e−(log m) c1(TX )/zm
YChern roots x of TX
where T = Ψm(eT ).
and the input of J fake is determined as eT =(cid:0)J fake(cid:1)+ − (1 − q). Here
(δt, T ) lies in the space (cid:3)ζ△−1TJ fake(eT ) Lfake,
X/Zm lies in the space
X/Zm is determined by
= Ψm(J fake),
Proof. According to Proposition 8, δJ st
(cid:3) LH, where the input T of δJ st
]+ − (1 − qm). By Proposition 9, J tw
(cid:3)ζ (cid:3)−1TJ tw
T = [J tw
X/Zm
X/Zm
X/Zm
HRR IN TRUE QUANTUM K-THEORY
35
+ along Kfake
(· · · )+ refers to the projection to Kfake
− , i.e. the polarization
described in Example 2, while the projection [· · · ]+ refers to the po-
larization in the unramified sector. The latter polarization is obtained
from the former by the Adams operation: Ψm : Kfake → Kfake, and the
relation between dilaton shifts is the same: 1 −qm = Ψm(1 −q). There-
(cid:3) LH can be described
We note that
fore T = Ψm(eT ), and the tangent space TJ tw
as (cid:3)△−1TJ fake(eT ) Lfake. (cid:4)
∞Yr=1
YChern roots x of TX
(cid:3)ζ△−1 ∼
X/Zm
1 − qre−x
1 − ζ −rqr/me−x .
One obtain ∇ζ by replacing in this formula q1/m with qζ and computing
the Euler–Maclaurin asymptotics of the result as qζ → 1.
According to Propositions 2, the expansion J (t)ζ near q = ζ −1 of
the true K-theoretic J-function is expressed in terms of correlators of
stem theory (as they appeared in Section 7), computed at the input T
equal to the leg contribution. More precisely, J(t)ζ is obtained from
δJ st
, defined as:
X/Zm
δt(q1/m) +Xa,n,d
Φa
Qd
n! (cid:20)
Φa
1 − q1/mL1/m , T (L), . . . , T (L), δt(L1/m)(cid:21)X,d
0,n+2
,
by changing q1/m → qζ (including such change in δt) and Qd → Qmd
(excluding such a change in δt).
Combining these facts with Corollary, we conclude that ∇−1
ζ J (t)ζ,
after the change q 7→ q/ζ, falls into the subspace T of Kfake which is
obtained from the tangent space TJ (0)1 Lfake by the changes q1/m 7→ q
and Qd 7→ Qmd.
This completes the proof of the Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch Theorem
in true quantum K-theory.
9. Floer’s S1-equivariant K-theory, and Dq-modules
In this section, we show that tangent spaces to the overruled La-
grangian cone L of quantum K-theory on X carry a natural structure
of modules over a certain algebra Dq of finite-difference operators with
respect to Novikov’s variables. This structure, although manifest in
some examples (see [13]) and predictable on heuristic grounds of S1-
equivariant Floer theory [7, 8], has been missing so far in the realm
of K-theoretic GW-invariants. We first recall the heuristics, and then
derive the Dq-invariance of the tangent spaces to L from the divisor
36
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
equation in quantum cohomology theory and our HRR Theorem in
quantum K-theory.
Let X be a compact symplectic (or Kahler) target space, which for
simplicity is assumed simply-connected in this preliminary discussion,
so that π2(X) = H2(X). Let k = rk H2(X), let d = (d1, . . . , dk) be
integer coordinates on H2(X, Q), and ω1, . . . , ωk be closed 2-forms on X
with integer periods, representing the corresponding basis of H 2(X, R).
On the space L0X of contractible parametrized loops S1 → X, as
well as on its universal cover gL0X, one defines closed 2-forms Ωa, that
to two vector fields ξ and η along a given loop associates the value
Ωa(ξ, η) :=I ωa(ξ(t), η(t)) dt.
disk u : D2 → X attached to it. One defines the action functionals
A point γ ∈ gL0X is a loop in X together with a homotopy type of a
Ha : gL0X → R by evaluating the 2-forms ωa on such disks:
Consider the action of S1 on gL0X, defined by the rotation of loops,
and let V denote the velocity vector field of this action. It is well-known
that V is Ωa-hamiltonian with the Hamilton function Ha, i.e.:
Ha(γ) :=ZD2
u∗ωa.
iV Ωa + dHa = 0,
a = 1, . . . , k.
Denote by z the generator of the coefficient ring H ∗(BS1) of S1-
equivariant cohomology theory. The S1-equivariant De Rham complex
(of gL0X in our case) consists of S1-invariant differential forms with
coefficients in R[z], and is equipped with the differential D := d + ziV .
Then
pa := Ωa + zHa,
a = 1, . . . , k,
are degree-2 S1-equivariantly closed elements of the complex: Dpa =
0. This is a standard fact that usually accompanies the formula of
Duistermaat–Heckman.
Furthermore, the lattice π2(X) acts by deck transformations on the
universal covering gL0X → L0X. Namely, an element d ∈ π2(X) acts on
γ ∈ gL0X by replacing the homotopy type [u] of the disk with [u]+d. We
denote by Qd = Qd1
the operation of pulling-back differential
forms by this deck transformation. It is an observation from [7, 8] that
the operations Qa and the operations of exterior multiplication by pa
do not commute:
1 · · · Qdk
k
paQb − Qbpa = −zQaδab.
HRR IN TRUE QUANTUM K-THEORY
37
These are commutation relations between generators of the algebra of
differential operators on the k-dimensional torus:
[−z∂τa , eτb] = −zeτaδab.
Likewise, if Pa denotes the S1-equivariant line bundle on gL0X whose
Chern character is e−pa, then tensoring vector bundles by Pa and pulling
back vector bundles by Qa do not commute:
PaQb = qQaPbδab.
These are commutation relations in the algebra of finite-difference op-
erators, generated by multiplications and translations:
Qa 7→ eτa, Pa 7→ ez∂τa = q∂τa , where q = ez.
Thinking of these operations acting on S1-equivariant Floer theory of
the loop space, one arrives at the conclusion that S1-equivariant Floer
cohomology (K-theory) should carry the structure of a module over the
algebra of differential (respectively finite-difference) operators. Here is
how this heuristic prediction materializes in GW-theory.
Proposition 10. Let D denote the algebra of differential opera-
tors generated by pa, a = 1, . . . , k, and Qd, with d lying in the Mori
cone of X. Define a representation of D on the symplectic loop space
H = H ∗(X, C[[Q]]) ⊗ C((z)) using the operators pa − zQa∂Qa (where
pa acts by multiplication in the classical cohomology algebra of X) and
Qd (acting by multiplication in the Novikov ring). Then tangent spaces
to the overruled Lagrangian cone LH ⊂ H of cohomological GW-theory
on X are D-invariant.
Proof. Invariance of with respect to multiplication by Qd is tau-
tological since the Novikov ring Q[[Q]] (which contains the semigroup
algebra of the Mori cone: we assume that da =Rd pa ≥ 0 for all a and
all d in the Mori cone) is considered as the ground ring of scalars. To
prove invariance with respect to operators pa − zQa∂Qa, recall from [12]
that tangent spaces to LH have the form S−1
τ H+, where H ∋ τ 7→ Sτ (z)
is a matrix power series in 1/z whose matrix entries are the following
cohomological GW-invariants:
Qd
φb
Sb
a = δb
a +Xl,d
l! Xµ
hφa, τ, . . . , τ,
iX,d
0,n+2.
z − ψ
The matrix Sτ lies in the twisted loop group, i.e. S−1
τ (−z).
Let ∂τa denote the differentiation in τ in the direction of the degree-2
cohomology class pa. According to the divisor equation,
τ (z) = S∗
zQa∂QaSτ (z) + Sτ (z)pa = z∂τa Sτ (z).
38
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
In fact z∂τa S = pa • S, where • stands for quantum cup-product. (This
follows from the property of LH to be overruled.) Transposing, we get:
(pa − zQa∂Qa)S−1
τ (z) = −z∂τa S−1
τ (z) = S−1
τ (z)(pa•).
z∂τµ Sτ (z) = (φµ•)Sτ (z), and hence − z∂τµS−1
Also, if τ =Pµ τµφµ ∈ H, then for any µ
Thus, if τ =P τµ(Q)φµ and h ∈ H+, so that f (z, Q) = S−1
lies in Tτ , then
τ (z) = S−1
τ (φµ•).
τ (z)h(z, Q)
(pa − zQa∂Qa)f = S−1
τ (z)h(pa•) − zQa∂Qa + zX Qa∂Qaτµ (φµ•)i h.
Since H+ is invariant under the operator in brackets, the result follows.
(cid:4)
Remarks. (1) Each ruling space zTτ , and therefore the whole cone
LH, is D-invariant, too.
(2) Symbols of differential operators annihilating all columns of S
provide relations between operators pa• in the quantum cohomology
algebra of X (see [10]).
Corollary 1. Tangent and ruling spaces of Lf ake are D-invariant.
Proof. In the QHRR formula ch( Lfake) = △ LH of Section 5, the
operator △ commutes with D, since it does not involve Novikov’s vari-
ables, and since the operators (which do occur in △) of multiplication
in the classical cohomology algebra of X commute with pa. (cid:4)
Lemma. The subspace T ⊂ Kfake obtained from TJ (0)1 Lfake by the
change z 7→ mz, Q 7→ Qm, is D-invariant.
µφµ ∈ H.
Proof. The tangent space in question is △(z)S−1
some τ (0) = Pµ τ 0
τ (0)(Q)(z, Q)H+ for
(Recall that H+ = H[[z]], and H =
H ∗(X, C[[Q]]).) The space T is therefore △(mz)S−1
τ (0)(Qm)(mz, Qm)H+,
where H+ is D-invariant, and △ commutes with D. Since zQa∂Qa =
mzQm
a , we find that the divisor equation still holds in the form:
(pa − zQa∂Qa)S−1
τ (mz, Qm)(pa•(τ,Qm)),
τ (mz, Qm) = S−1
a ∂Qm
where the last subscript indicates that the matrix elements of pa• de-
pend on τ and Qm. The result now follows as in Proposition 10. (cid:4)
Corollary 2. Let ζ be a primitive mth root of unity. Then the
factor Lζ = ∇ζT ζ of the adelic cone b L is D-invariant.
Proof. Recall that the space T ζ is related to T by the change
q = ζez, and the action of z in the operator pa − zQa∂Qa should be
HRR IN TRUE QUANTUM K-THEORY
39
understood in the sense of this identification. The result follows from
Lemma since ∇ζ commutes with D (like △, in Corollary 1). (cid:4)
Theorem. Let Dq denote the algebra of finite-difference operators,
generated by integer powers of Pa, a = 1, . . . , k, and Qd, with d lying
in the Mori cone of X. Define a representation of Dq on the sym-
plectic loop space K, using the operators PaqQa∂Qa (where Pa acts by
multiplication in K 0(X) by the line bundle with the Chern character
e−pa) together with the operators of multiplication by Qd in the Novikov
ring. Then tangent (and ruling) spaces to the overruled Lagrangian
cone L ⊂ K of true quantum K-theory on X are Dq-invariant.
Proof. Thanks to the adelic characterization of the cone L and its
ruling spaces, given by Theorem of Section 6 and its Corollary, this is
an immediate consequence of the following Lemma.
Lemma. The adelic cone bL is Dq-invariant.
Proof. It is obvious that the factors Lζ are D-invariant for ζ other
than roots of unity, since in this case Lζ = Kfake
+ . For ζ = 1, it fol-
lows from Corollary 1 that the family of operators eǫ(zQa∂Qa −pa) pre-
serves Lfake, and so does the operator with ǫ = 1, which coincides with
PaqQa∂Qa . When ζ 6= 1 is a primitive mth root of unity, the family of
operators eǫ(zQa∂Qa −pa) preserves Lζ by Corollary 2. However, at ǫ = 1,
the operator of the family differs from PaqQa∂Qa (because q = ζez) by
the factor ζ Qa∂Qa , which acts as Qa 7→ Qaζ. It is essential that this
extra factor commutes with S−1
τ (0)(Qm)(mz, Qm) (due to ζ m = 1). Since
it also preserves H+, the result follows. (cid:4)
Example. It is known8 [13] that for X = CP n−1,
J (0) = (1 − q)
Qd
(1 − P q)n · · · (1 − P qd)n ,
∞Xd=0
where P ∈ K 0(Cn−1) represents the Hopf line bundle. It follows (from
the string equation) that (J (0)/(1−q) lies in the tangent space TJ (0) L.
Applying powers T r of the translation operator T := P qQ∂Q, we con-
clude that, for all integer r, the same tangent space contains
P r
∞Xd=0
Qdqrd
(1 − P q)n · · · (1 − P qd)n .
8This result is derived from birational isomorphisms between some genus-0 mod-
uli spaces of stable maps to CP n−1 × CP 1 and toric compactifications of spaces of
maps CP 1 → CP n−1.
40
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
In fact, J (0) satisfies the 2nd order finite-difference equation DnJ(0) =
QJ (0), where D := 1 − T . Therefore the Dq-module generated by
J(0)/(1 − q) is spanned over the Novikov ring by T rJ(0)/(1 − q) with
r = 0, . . . , n − 1. The projections of these elements to K+ are P r, r =
0, . . . , n − 1, which span the ring K 0(CP n−1) = Z[P, P −1]/(1 − P )n.
The K-theoretic Poincare pairing on this ring is given by the residue
formula:
(Φ(P ), Φ′(P )) = − ResP =1
Φ(P )Φ′(P )
(1 − P )n
dP
P
.
By computing the pairings with the above series we actually evaluate
K-theoretic GW-invariants:
(Φ(P ), T rJ (0)/(1 − q)) =Xd
Qdh
Φ(P )
1 − qL
, P riX,d
0,2 , r = 0, . . . , n − 1.
Thus, we started with known values of all hΦLk, 1iX,d
hΦLk, Φ′iX,d
invariants, all hΦLk, Φ′LliX,d
0,2 and computed all
0,2 (and hence, by virtue of general properties of genus-0 GW-
0,2 ) using the Dq-module structure alone.
10. Quantum K-theory of projective complete
intersections
Theorem. Let X be a complete intersection in the projective space
CP n−1, n > 4, given by k(≥ 0) equations of degrees l1, . . . , lk > 1, such
that l2
k ≤ n. Then the following series represents a point in the
overruled Lagrangian cone of true quantum K-theory of X:
1 + · · · l2
j=1Qlj d
IX := (1 − q)Xd≥0Qk
Qd
r=1(1 − P qr)n
r=0(1 − P lj qr)
Qd.
More precisely, IX = ν∗JX(0), where ν∗ : K 0(X) → K 0(CP n−1) is the
K-theoretic push-forward induced by the embedding ν : X → CP n−1,
and JX(0) is the value of the J-function of true quantum K-theory of
X at the input t = 0.
Remarks. (1) To clarify this formulation, we remind that P repre-
sents the Hopf line bundle in K 0(CP n−1). By Lefschetz’ hyperplane
section theorem, the inclusion X ⊂ CP n−1 induces an isomorphism
H2(X, Q) → H2(CP n−1, Q), whenever 2 ≤ n − k − 2. The latter holds
true under our numerical restrictions on lj and n. Consequently, the
degrees of holomorphic curves in X are represented in IX by their de-
grees d in the ambient projective space.
(2) WhenP l2
l1 = 2, while n = 4). Since we assumed n > 4, we have for each d > 0:
HRR IN TRUE QUANTUM K-THEORY
41
j ≤ n, we also haveP lj < n−2 (strictly, unless k = 1,
1 +X ljd(ljd + 1)
d(d + 1)
< n
2
2
.
This means that the coefficient of IX at Qd is a reduced rational func-
tion of q. Thus, the projection of IX to K+ is 1 − q, i.e. IX corresponds
to the input value t = 0.
(3) Note that the example n = 4, k = 1, l1 = 2 of the conic CP 1 ×
CP 1 ⊂ CP 3 is exceptional in the sense of both previous remarks. It
would be interesting to analyze the role of the series IX in quantum
K-theory of the conic.
Corollary. For all s ∈ Z
0,2 = (Φ(P ), T sIX/(1 − q)),
r=0(1 − P lj qr)
Qdqsd.
r=1(1 − P qr)n
where (·, ·) is the K-theoretic Poincare pairing on K 0(CP n−1), and
Qdh
, ν∗P siX,d
ν∗Φ(P )
1 − qL
Xd
j=1Qlj d
T sIX/(1 − q) = P sXd≥0Qk
Qd
When k = 0, it is known from [13], that the formula for IX represents
the value J (0) of the K-theoretic J-function of the projective space. We
will begin our proof of the theorem, however, with re-deriving this fact
(and without the restriction n > 4, of course) from the main theorem
of this paper. After that we explain how to adjust the argument to the
case of projective complete intersections.
To prove the theorem for X = CP n−1 (let’s omit the subscript X in
this case), we will show that expansions of the series I near q = ζ −1
pass the tests required by the Quantum HRR Theorem of Section 6.
Since P is unipotent, IX has obviously no poles in q other than roots
of unity.
To show that the expansion of I near q = 1 lies in the cone Lfake of
the fake quantum K-theory of X, we begin with the following mirror-
theoretic formula from cohomological GW-theory of projective spaces
(see [8]):
J H(pτ ) = −ze−pτ /zXd≥0
Qdedτ
.
r=1(p − rz)n
Qd
Here p is the hyperplane class, τ is the coordinate on H 2(CP n−1, C),
and J H is the J-function of the cohomological GW-theory of CP n−1.
42
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
We now apply the “quantum Lefschetz’ theorem” in the form of
Coates–Corti–Iritani–Tseng [4] to conclude that the one-parametric
family
I fake(τ ) := −zP −τ /zXd≥0
Qdedτ
r=1(1 − P erz)n
Qd
lies in Lfake, the overruled Lagrangian cone of fake quantum K-theory
of CP n−1.
Let us recall from Section 5 that Lfake = ch−1 △ LH, where
, z = log q, P = ch−1(e−p),
log △ ∼
s(x − rz), s(u) := log
u
1 − e−u ,
and x runs Chern roots of TCP n−1. We claim that in fact
∞Xr=1Xx
∞Xr=1
log △ ∼
(n s(p − rz) − s(−rz)) .
Indeed, TCP n−1 = nP −1 − 1, and the construction of the operator log △
from (Chern roots of) a bundle is additive. Note that the last summand
does not affect the way △ acts on LH, since, being overruled, the cone
LH is invariant under multiplication by functions of z.
Replace (following [4]) the degree-2 cohomology class p with the op-
erator of differentiation −z∂p in the direction of this class, and consider
the Euler–Maclaurin asymptotics:
n s(−z∂p − rz).
∞Xr=1
logb△ ∼
On the one hand, applying b△−1 to the J-function J H (i.e. making ∂p
act as the derivative in τ , one obtains a family still lying in the same
cone LH as J H.9 On the other hand,
s(−z∂p − rz)edτ −pτ /z = s(pτ − (r + d)z)edτ −pτ /z,
and hence
b△−1(cid:0)edτ −pτ /z(cid:1) = △−1 ×(cid:0)edτ −pτ /z(cid:1) dYr=1
en s(p−rz).
9This is the result of a non-trivial lemma from [5] based on properties of the
D-module generated by the J-function and used there in the proof of a Quantum
Lefschetz’ Theorem, generalized in [4].
HRR IN TRUE QUANTUM K-THEORY
43
It follows that modifying each Qd-term in J H by the factor
en s(p−rz) =
dYr=1
(p − rz)n
(1 − e−p+rz)n ,
dYr=1
one obtains a family lying in the cone △ LH = ch( Lfake). The modified
family is I fake(τ ) indeed.
Note that (1 − ez)I fake(0)/(−z) coincides with I after the change
e−p =: P and ez =: q, that is, the expansion of I near q = 1 coincides
with (1 − ez)I fake(0)/(−z) ∈ Lfake as required.
To analyze the expansion of I near q = ζ −1 where ζ is an m-th
root of 1, we note first, that by the previous the family I fake(τ )/(−z)
represents tangent vectors Lfake at the family of application points (1 −
q)I fake(τ )/(−z). Following test (iii) in Theorem of Section 6, we first
change q 7→ qm, Q 7→ Qm, and obtain the following family of tangent
vectors to the cone thus transformed:
e−pτ / log qmXd≥0
(1 − P qm)n(1 − P q2m)n · · · (1 − P qmd)n .
Qmdedτ
Now we employ the construction of [4] once again, this time using the
operator ∇ζ. Namely, we put:
to the above family of tangent vectors. Since
(1 − qmr+m∂p)n
(1 − qr+m∂p)n ,
∞Yr=1
edτ(cid:1) = e−pτ / log qm
edτ(cid:1)Qd
ζ ×(cid:0)e−pτ / log qm
Qmd
edτ P qmd,
r=1(1 − P qmr)n
r=1(1 − P qr)n
.
Qmdedτ
(1 − P q)n(1 − P q2)n · · · (1 − P qmd)n .
ζ
and hence
b∇ζ ∼qζ→1
and apply b∇−1
qm∂p(cid:0)e−pτ / log qm
ζ (cid:0)e−pτ / log qm
edτ(cid:1) = ∇−1
b∇−1
ζ ×eIζ(τ ), where
eIζ := e−pτ / log qmXd≥0
I =Xd≥0
The result is ∇−1
The expression should be interpreted as a Laurent series expansion near
q = ζ −1, and as such should be compared with Iζ, where
(1 − P q)n(1 − P q2)n · · · (1 − P qd)n .
Qd
44
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
divisible by m, but all other terms are missing.
At τ = 0, the terms of eIζ reproduce correctly the terms of Iζ with d
Nevertheless, we derive from this that Iζ lies in the space ∇ζT where
T is obtained from TI fake(0) Lfake by the changes q 7→ qm, Q 7→ Qm.
Namely, let Tτ denote the spaces thus obtained from TI fake(τ ) Lfake. We
have: eIζ(τ ) ∈ ∇ζTτ . Consider operators
Qdedτ
D(τ ) :=
m−1Xd=0
Qd
r=1(1 − q−m∂pqr)n
.
It should be understood as an expansion near q = ζ −1, and it is impor-
tant that within the given range 0 < r ≤ d < m of the indices d and r,
the denominators have no zeroes at q = ζ −1, and thus D(τ ) is a power
series in z∂p (z = log q). We conclude that D(τ )eIζ(τ ) ∈ ∇ζTτ (since
z∂p preserves tangent spaces to overruled cones). At τ = 0, we have:
which thus proves that Iζ ∈ ∇ζT .
Iζ = D(τ )eIζ(τ ) τ =0,
What we have established about the series I means that the decom-
position of it into elementary fractions obeys the recursion relations
of Section 7, with the leg contribution obtained by Adams’ opera-
tion Ψ from the arm contribution, corresponding to the input point
t(q) = [I]+ − (1 − q). Since the projection [. . . ]+ of I to K+ is 1 − q,
we find that t = 0 as required, and hence I = J (0). (cid:3)
Remark. With the exception of the last property [I]+ = 1 − q, this
seemingly sophisticated argument is in fact general enough to work for
q-hypergeometric series IX that can be associated to any symplectic
toric manifold X as follows. Let X be obtained by symplectic reduction
X = Cn//T k by the action of the subtorus T k ⊂ T n of the maximal
torus, the embedding being determined (in some basis of π1(T k)) by
the integer matrix (mij), i = 1, . . . , k, j = 1, . . . , n (see [7, 11] for more
details). Let Qd = Qd1
k represents a point in the Mori cone of X
in coordinates (d1, . . . , dk) on H2(X) corresponding to the chosen basis
of π1(T k), and P −1
, i = 1, . . . , k, denote the line bundles over X whose
1st Chern classes form the dual basis of H 2(X). In this notation:
1 · · · Qdk
i
IX =Xd
Qd
r=−∞(1 − qrQk
nYj=1 Q0
QPi dimij
r=−∞ (1 − qrQk
i
i=1 P mij
)
i=1 P mij
i
.
)
HRR IN TRUE QUANTUM K-THEORY
45
The property [IX ]+ = 1 − q, however, does not hold unless X is a
product of complex projective spaces. It would be interesting to find
out if nevertheless IX ∈ LX.
The above computation will also work for the series IX corresponding
to projective complete intersection described in the theorem. However,
there is a catch here, related to the fact that cohomology and K-theory
of X may not be entirely describable in terms of the ambient projec-
tive space, and thus the information gained about IX won’t yet allow
to make a legitimate application of our Quantum HRR Theorem. More
specifically, our computation would only be concerned with the prop-
erties of ν∗(IX) expressed in terms of ν∗(I fake), and the latter may not
even lie on Lfake.
In order to bypass the difficulty, we introduce a model of quantum
K-theory of a supermanifold ΠE, interpolating between those of X
and CP n−1. Let E be the total space of the sum of the line bundles
over CP n−1 of degrees l1, . . . , lk, while Π indicates the fiberwise parity
change. By definition, genus-0 moduli spaces of stable maps to ΠE are
the same as to CP n−1, but the virtual structure sheaf is changed, by
tensoring the structure sheaf Ovir
0,r,d with the S1-equivariant K-theoretic
Euler class of the bundle E0,r,d (i.e.
the Koszul complex of the dual,
0,r,d). Here E0,r,d stands for the bundle π∗ ev∗ E whose fiber over a
E∗
stable map f : Σ → CP n−1 is H 0(Σ, f ∗E). The circle S1 is made
to act by multiplication by unitary scalars fiberwise on E, and hence
on E0,r,d. Respectively, correlators of quantum K-theory of ΠE take
values in the representation ring C[S1] = C[Λ, Λ−1]. Their algebraic-
geometrical meaning (instead of holomorphic Euler characteristics of a
sheaf) is the trace of S1 on the sheaf cohomology. The ring K 0(ΠE)
coincides with K 0(CP n−1)⊗C[S1], and is equipped with the K-theoretic
Poincare pairing
(Φ, Φ′)ΠE = − ResP =1 Φ(P )Φ′(P )Qk
j=1(1 − P lj Λ)
(1 − P )n
dP
P
.
This pairing becomes non-degenerate if division by 1 − Λ is allowed.
After this localization, the resulting quantum K-theory of the super-
manifold ΠE satisfies all the axioms of genus-0 quantum K-theory.
Furthermore, the Quantum HRR Theorem of Section 6 and its proof
given in Sections 7 and 8 work verbatim for true quantum K-theory of
ΠE.10
10Note that we are not using any geometric fixed point localization with respect
to S 1, so that all moduli spaces, Kawasaki strata, etc. remain the same, and only
the meaning and values of the correlators are modified appropriately.
46
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
Thus, applying the same technology as we did in the case of X =
CP n−1, we establish that under the numerical assumptions of Theorem,
JΠE(0) = IΠE, where
IΠE :=Xd≥0
QdQk
r=1(1 − P qr)n
Here are some formulas that elucidate this claim:
r=1(1 − P lj Λqr)
.
j=1Qljd
Qd
QdedτQk
J H
ΠE(pτ ) = −ze−pτ /zXd≥0
r=1(λ + ljp − rz)
r=1(p − rz)n
,
j=1Qlj d
Qd
where λ is the 1st Chern class of the universal S1-bundle Λ−1 (i.e.
ch(Λ) = e−λ);
r=1(1 − P lj Λqr)
;
r=1(1 − P qr)n
(1 − e−λ+lj z∂p+rz)
(λ − ljz∂p − rz)
;
I fake
∞Yr=1
b△ ∼
(−z∂p − rz)n
(1 − ez∂p+rz)n
ΠE (τ ) := −(log q)P −τ / log qXd≥0
kYj=1
j=1Qlj d
QdedτQk
Qd
kYj=1
b∇ζ ∼qζ→1
j=1Qmlj d
QmdedτQk
eIζ := e−pτ / log qmXd≥0
Qmd
j=1Qljd
QdedτQk
m−1Xd=0
Qd
(1 − qmr+m∂p)n
(1 − qr+m∂p)n
∞Yr=1
D(τ ) :=
r=1(1 − q−m∂pqr)n
r=1 (1 − ΛP lj qr)
;
r=1(1 − P qr)n
r=1(1 − Λq−mlj ∂pqr)
.
(1 − Λqr+mlj∂p)
(1 − Λqmr+mlj ∂p)
;
Once the equality JΠE(0) = IΠE is proved, to establish the equality
ν∗JX(0) = IX, it remains to notice that for all s ∈ Z
(ν∗P s, JX(0))X = (P s, JΠE(0))ΠE Λ=1.
Indeed, when X is given in CP n−1 by a section of E, the moduli space
X0,r,d is given in (CP n−1)0,r,d by the corresponding section of the bundle
E0,r,d, and (according to [21, 22]) the virtual structure sheaf of X0,r,d is
described in K 0((CP n−1)0,r,d) by tensoring the virtual structure sheaf
of (CP n−1)0,r,d with the K-theoretic Euler class of E0,r,d, albeit, the
non-equivariant one, and hence the specialization to Λ = 1.
Remark. In a separate paper, we will describe a different machin-
ery, based on the Adams–Riemann–Roch–Grothendieck formula, that
allows one to compare genus-0 K-theoretic GW-invariants of complete
HRR IN TRUE QUANTUM K-THEORY
47
intersections (and more general “twisted” quantum K-theories) with
those of the ambient space, remaining entirely on K-theoretic grounds.
References
[1] D. Abramovich, T. Graber, A. Vistoli. Algebraic orbifold quantum products.
Orbifolds in mathematics and physics (Madison, WI, 2001), pp. 124. Con-
temp. Math., 310. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2002.
[2] W. Chen, Y. Ruan. Orbifold Gromov–Witten theory. Orbifolds in mathe-
matics and physics (Madison, WI, 2001), pp. 2585. Contemp. Math., 310.
Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2002.
[3] T. Coates. Riemann–Roch theorems in Gromov–Witten theory. PhD thesis,
2003, available at http://math.harvard.edu/∼tomc/thesis.pdf
[4] T. Coates, A. Corti, H. Iritani, H-H. Tseng. Computing twisted genus-zero
Gromov-Witten invariants. Duke Mathematical Journal, 147 (2009), no. 3,
377–438.
[5] T. Coates, A. Givental. Quantum Riemann–Roch, Lefschetz and Serre. Ann.
of Math. (2), 165 (2007), 15-53.
[6] T. Coates, A. Givental. Quantum cobordisms and formal group laws. The
unity of mathematics, 155–171, Progr. Math., 244, Birkhauser Boston,
Boston, MA, 2006.
[7] A. Givental. Homological geometry and mirror symmetry. Talk at ICM-94.
In: Proceedings of ICM-94 Zurich. Birkhauser, Basel, 1995, 472480.
[8] A. Givental. Homological geometry I. Projective hypersurfaces. Selecta Math.
(New Series) 1 (1995), 325 345.
[9] A. Givental. On the WDVV-equation in quantum K-theory. Mich. Math. J.
48 (2000) 295-304.
[10] A. Givental. Equivariant Gromov–Witten invariants. IMRN, 1996, 613663.
[11] A. Givental. A mirror theorem for toric complete intersections. Topological
field theory, primitive forms and related topics (Kyoto, 1996), 1998, pp.
141175.
[12] A. Givental. Symplectic geometry of Frobenius structures. Frobenius mani-
folds, Aspects Math., E36, Vieweg, Wiesbaden, 2004, pp. 91-112.
[13] A. Givental, Y.-P. Lee. Quantum K-theory on flag manifolds, finite difference
Toda lattices and quantum groups. Invent. Math. 151, 193-219, 2003.
[14] F. Hirzebruch. Topological Methods in Algebraic Geometry. 3rd ed. Trans-
lated from German. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1966, xii
+ 232 pp.
[15] T. Jarvis, T. Kimura. Orbifold quantum cohomology of the classifying space
of a finite group. Orbifolds in mathematics and physics (Madison, WI, 2001),
Contemp. Math., vol. 310, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2002, pp. 123-
134.
[16] T. Kawasaki. The Riemann-Roch theorem for complex V -manifolds. Osaka
J. Math. Volume 16, Number 1 (1979), 151-159.
[17] B. Kim. Quantum cohomology of flag manifolds G/B and quantum Toda
lattices. Ann. of Math. (2) 149 (1999), no. 1, 129148.
[18] M. Kontsevich, Yu. Manin. Gromov–Witten Classes, quantum cohomology,
and enumerative geometry. Comm. Math. Phys. 164 (1994), no. 3, 525-562.
48
A. GIVENTAL AND V. TONITA
[19] Y.-P. Lee. Quantum K-theory I. Foundations. Duke Math. J. 121 (2004), no.
3, 389-424.
[20] D. Mumford. Towards an enumerative geometry of the moduli space of
curves. Arithmetic and geometry, Vol. II, 271328, Progr. Math., 36,
Birkhauser, 1983.
[21] V. Tonita. Twisted Gromov-Witten invariants and applications to quantum
K-theory. PhD thesis, UC Berkeley, 2011.
[22] V. Tonita. Virtual Kawasaki’s Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch formula formula.
In preparation.
[23] V. Tonita. Twisted Gromov-Witten invariants of orbifold target spaces. In
preparation.
[24] H.-H. Tseng. Orbifold Quantum Riemann–Roch, Lefschetz and Serre. Ge-
ometry and Topology 14 (2010), 1–81.
|
1911.09341 | 1 | 1911 | 2019-11-21T08:43:37 | Normal reduction numbers of normal surface singularities | [
"math.AG"
] | This article consists of two parts. The first part is a survey on the normal reduction numbers of normal surface singularities. It includes results on elliptic singularities, cone-like singularities and homogeneous hypersurface singularities. In the second part, we prove a new results on the normal reduction numbers and related invariants of Brieskorn complete intersections. | math.AG | math | NORMAL REDUCTION NUMBERS OF NORMAL SURFACE
SINGULARITIES
TOMOHIRO OKUMA
Dedicated to Professor Andr´as N´emethi on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday
Abstract. This article consists of two parts. The first part is a survey on the
normal reduction numbers of normal surface singularities. It includes results on
elliptic singularities, cone-like singularities and homogeneous hypersurface singu-
larities.
In the second part, we prove a new results on the normal reduction
numbers and related invariants of Brieskorn complete intersections.
9
1
0
2
v
o
N
1
2
]
.
G
A
h
t
a
m
[
1
v
1
4
3
9
0
.
1
1
9
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
1. Introduction
In this paper, we survey results on the normal reduction numbers of normal com-
plex surface singularities and some related topics ([23], [24], [26], [28]), and prove a
new results on the normal reduction numbers of Brieskorn complete intersections.
The normal reduction number has appeared in the study of normal Hilbert poly-
nomials from a ring-theoretic point of view (cf.
[6], [14]). We study the normal
reduction numbers of the local ring of normal surface singularities using resolution
of singularities, and we wish to know what kind of geometric property of singularities
relates to the normal reduction numbers.
Let us briefly recall some basic facts about integral closure and reduction of ideals
in a local ring. Let (A, m) be a Noetherian local ring and I an m-primary ideal
(namely, √I = m). Let I denote the integral closure of I, that is, I is an ideal of A
consists of all elements z ∈ A such that zn + c1zn−1 +· · ·+ cn = 0 for some n ≥ 1 and
ci ∈ I i (i = 1, . . . , n). The ideal I is said to be integrally closed if I = I. An ideal
Q ⊂ I is called a reduction of I if I n+1 = QI n for some n ≥ 0. It is known that an
ideal Q is a reduction of I if and only if I ⊂ Q (cf. [5, 1.2.5]). For a reduction Q of
I, rQ(I) := min{n I n+1 = QI n} is called the reduction number of I with respect
to Q.
Let (V, p) be a normal complex surface singularity1 and OV,p the local ring of the
singularity with maximal ideal m. Let I ⊂ OV,p be an m-primary integrally closed
ideal. It is known that any minimal reduction of I is generated by two elements
and that two general elements of I generate a minimal reduction of I (see [5, 8.3.7,
1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 14J17; Secondary 14B05, 32S25, 13B22.
Key words and phrases. Normal reduction number, normal surface singularity, geometric genus,
elliptic singularity, Brieskorn complete intersection, homogeneous hypersurface singularity.
This work was partially supported by JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) Grant
Number 17K05216.
1In our papers [23], [24], [26], [28], we treat a singularity (Spec A, m), where (A, m) is an excellent
normal two-dimensional local ring such that the residue field k is algebraically closed and k ⊂ A.
1
2
TOMOHIRO OKUMA
8.6.6]). Suppose that Q is a minimal reduction of I. We define two normal reduction
numbers, which are analogues of the reduction number rQ(I), as follows:
nr(I) = min{n ∈ Z≥0 I n+1 = QI n},
¯r(I) = min{n ∈ Z≥0 I N +1 = QI N for every N ≥ n}.
We note that nr(I) and ¯r(I) are independent of the choice of Q (see e.g. [4, Theorem
4.5], Proposition 3.2), though rQ(I) is not independent of the choice of a minimal
reduction Q in general. It is obvious by the definition that nr(I) ≤ ¯r(I). We will
show that ¯r(I) ≤ pg(V, p) + 1 in general (see Proposition 3.2). We can also show
that for any integer g ≥ 2 there exists a singularity (V, p) with nr(I) = 1 and
¯r(I) = pg(V, p) + 1 = g + 1 (Example 4.5). We define
nr(V, p) = max{nr(J) J is an m-primary integrally closed ideal of OV,p},
¯r(V, p) = max{¯r(J) J is an m-primary integrally closed ideal of OV,p}.
The invariant ¯r(V, p) naturally appears in several situation as follows. For any m-
primary integrally closed ideal I ⊂ OV,p, there exist a resolution π : X → V and
a divisor Z on X such that OX (−Z) is π-generated and I = π∗OX (−Z)p (see
Section 2). Let r := ¯r(I). By the definition of ¯r and Proposition 3.2, we have the
following:
(1) Brian¸con-Skoda type inclusion (cf. [13], [3]): I r+k ⊂ Qk for k ≥ 1.
(2) The natural homomorphism π∗OX (−nZ)⊗ π∗OX (−Z) → π∗OX(−(n + 1)Z)
is surjective for n ≥ r.
(3) The function φ(n) := dimC H 0(OX )/H 0(OX (−nZ)) is a polynomial function
of n for n ≥ r; note that φ(n) = χ(OnZ) + h1(OX )−h1(OX(−nZ)) by Kato's
Riemann-Roch Theorem ([8]).
So we expect that the normal reduction numbers can characterize good singularities.
For example, we see that (V, p) is a rational singularity if and only if ¯r(V, p) = 1 (see
Proposition 3.6). However, we can only show that ¯r(V, p) = 2 if (V, p) is an elliptic
singularity (see Theorem 3.9, Proposition 5.13). At present, we have computed the
normal reduction numbers only for some special cases, and we do not know whether
those invariants are topological or not.
This paper is organized as follows. Sections 2 -- 4 are devoted to a survey of fun-
damental results on the normal reduction numbers and some related topics.
In
Section 2, we set up notation and briefly recall the basic results on the cohomology
groups of ideal sheaves of cycles on a resolution space. Then we mention a question
about the range of the dimension of those cohomology groups. In Section 3, we give
a relation between the normal reduction numbers and the dimension of the cohomol-
ogy groups associated with an m-primary integrally closed ideal in OV,p and review
fundamental results on the normal reduction numbers. Then we review the results
on elliptic singularities. In Section 4, we consider the cone-like singularities, namely,
those homeomorphic to the cone over a nonsingular curve. We give an upper bound
of ¯r using the genus and gonality of the curve and the self-intersection number of the
fundamental cycles. Then we show a formula for the normal reduction numbers of
homogeneous hypersurface singularities. In Section 5, we prove an explicit formula
for ¯r of the maximal ideal of a Brieskorn complete intersection and apply the formula
NORMAL REDUCTION NUMBERS OF NORMAL SURFACE SINGULARITIES
3
to classify elliptic singularities, which are natural generalization of the results about
Brieskorn hypersurface singularities in [28].
2. Cycles and Cohomology
Let (V, p) be a normal complex surface singularity, namely, the germ of a normal
complex surface V at p ∈ V . We always assume that V is Stein and suitably small.
Let π : X → V denote a resolution of the singularity (V, p) with exceptional set
E = π−1(p) and let {Ei}i∈I denote the set of irreducible components of E. We call
a divisor on X supported in E a cycle and denote byP ZEi the group of cycles.
For a function h ∈ H 0(OX (−E)), we denote by (h)E ∈ P ZEi the exceptional
An element ofP QEi := (P ZEi)⊗ Q is called a Q-cycle. A Q-cycle D is said to
part of the divisor divX(h); so, divX(h) − (h)E is an effective divisor containing no
components of E. We simply write (h)E instead of (h ◦ π)E for h ∈ m.
be nef (resp. anti-nef) if DEi ≥ 0 (resp. DEi ≤ 0) for all i ∈ I. Note that if D 6= 0
is anti-nef, then D ≥ E.
Definition 2.1. The maximal ideal cycle on X is the minimum of {(h)E h ∈ m}
and denoted by MX . There exists a Q-cycle ZKX such that (KX + ZKX )Ei = 0 for
every i ∈ I, where KX is a canonical divisor on X. We call ZKX the canonical cycle
on X.
In the following, we assume that Z > 0 is a cycle such that OX (−Z) has no fixed
component, namely, there exists a function h ∈ H 0(OX(−Z)) such that (h)E = Z.
We say that OX(−Z) is generated if it is π-generated (i,e., π∗π∗OX (−Z) → OX (−Z)
is surjective). For any coherent sheaf F on X, we write H i(F ) = H i(X,F ) and
hi(F ) = dimC(H i(F )).
Definition 2.2. The geometric genus of the singularity (V, p) is defined by pg(V, p) =
h1(OX ).
Definition 2.3. Let A ≥ 0 be an effective cycle on X and let
h(A) = maxnh1(OB)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) B ∈X ZEi, B ≥ 0, Supp(B) ⊂ Supp(A)o.
We put h1(OB) = 0 if B = 0. There exists a unique minimal cycle C such that
h1(OC) = h(A) (cf.
[31, 4.8]). We call C the cohomological cycle of A. Note that
pg(V, p) = h(E) and that if (V, p) is Gorenstein and π is the minimal resolution,
then ZKX is the cohomological cycle of E ([31, 4.20]).
We define a reduced cycle A⊥ to be the sum of the components Ei ⊂ E such that
AEi = 0.
Remark 2.4. Let F1, . . . , Fk be the connected component of Z ⊥ and let (Vi, pi) be
the normal surface singularity obtained by contracting Fi. If C is the cohomological
cycle of Z ⊥, we have
h1(OC) =
pg(Vi, pi).
kXi=1
Definition 2.5. Let q(Z) = h1(OX(−Z)) and qZ(n) = h1(OX(−nZ)) for n ≥ 0.
Let s(Z) = min{n ∈ Z≥0 qZ(n) = qZ(n + 1)}.
4
TOMOHIRO OKUMA
Proposition 2.6 (See [26, §3], [23, 3.6]). We have the following.
where C is the cohomological cycle of Z ⊥.
(1) qZ(n) ≥ qZ(n + 1) for every integer n ≥ 0.
(2) If qZ(1) = pg(V, p), namely, s(Z) = 0, then q(n) = pg(V, p) for n ≥ 0.
(3) If OX (−Z) is generated, then qZ(n) = qZ(s(Z)) = h1(OC) for n ≥ s(Z),
(4) OX (−nZ) is generated for n > s(Z).
We are interested in the range of the function q. Let A (resp. A′) denotes the
set of the pairs (Y, W ) such that W > 0 is a cycle on a resolution Y → V such that
OY (−W ) is generated (resp. has no fixed components). Clearly, A ⊂ A′. Let
q(A) =(cid:8)h1(OY (−W )) (Y, W ) ∈ A(cid:9), q(A′) =(cid:8)h1(OY (−W )) (Y, W ) ∈ A′(cid:9).
By Proposition 2.6, we have
The proof of the following theorem is included in the proof of [23, 3.12].
q(A) ⊂ q(A′) ⊂ {0, 1, . . . , pg(V, p)}.
Proposition 2.7. We have the equality
q(A′) = {0, 1, . . . , pg(V, p)}.
Conjecture 2.8. For every normal complex surface singularity, the equality q(A) =
q(A′) holds.
At present, we have the equality q(A) = q(A′) only for a few cases (cf. Propo-
sition 3.11, Example 4.5). Some results related to Conjecture 2.8 are obtained in
[16].
The next lemma is used in Section 5. For a Q-cycle D, let OX (D) = OX (⌊D⌋),
6≤ C. Moreover assume that there exists
where ⌊D⌋ denotes the integral part of D.
Lemma 2.9. Let C < E be a reduced cycle and {In}n∈Z≥0 a filtration of OV,p such
We write ∆ = ∆1 − ∆2, where ∆1 and ∆2 are effective and have no common
2 ≤
∆∆2 = (h)E∆2; it contradicts that (h)E is anti-nef. Hence ∆ = ∆1 ≥ 0, namely,
that (h)E ≥ nC for all n ∈ Z≥0 and all h ∈ In \ {0} and that Ln≥0 In/In+1 is
reduced. Assume that there exists an anti-nef Q-cycle eC =P aiEi such that ai = 1
for Ei ≤ C and eCEi = 0 for every Ei
an integer d > 0 such that deC ∈ P ZEi and (h)E = deC for some h ∈ Id. Then
In =eIn := π∗OX(−neC)p.
Proof. First we show that In ⊂eIn for every n ≥ 0. Let h ∈ In and ∆ = (h)E − neC.
components. Since (h)E ≥ nC, by the assumption on eC, we have Supp(∆2) ⊂
Supp(eC − C) = Supp(E − C), and hence eC∆2 = 0. If ∆2 6= 0, then 0 < −∆2
h ∈eIn.
From the arguments in §2.2 -- 2.4 of [35], since Ln≥0 In/In+1 is reduced, we have
that dD ∈P ZEi and OX (−dD) is generated. The inclusion Id ⊂ eId implies that
dD ≥ deC. Since there exists h ∈ Id such that deC = (h)E ≥ dD, we obtain
eC = D.
a Q-cycle D > 0 such that In = π∗OX(−nD)p for all n ∈ Z≥0, and we may assume
(cid:3)
NORMAL REDUCTION NUMBERS OF NORMAL SURFACE SINGULARITIES
5
3. Cohomology and normal reduction numbers
Let m ⊂ OV,p denote the maximal ideal. In the following, we always assume that
I ⊂ OV,p is an m-primary integrally closed ideal, namely, I satisfies that √I = m and
¯I = I. Let Q be a minimal reduction of I. Then there exist a resolution π : X → V
and a cycle Z > 0 such that
I = IZ := π∗OX(−Z)p
and IOX = OX (−Z) (cf.
[12, §6]). In this case, we say that I is represented by a
cycle Z on X. We use the symbol "IZ" only when OX(−Z) is generated. Conversely,
such an ideal IZ is m-primary and integrally closed. Note that IZIZ ′ = IZ+Z ′. Thus
we can write
nr(IZ) = min(cid:8)n ∈ Z>0 (cid:12)(cid:12) I(n+1)Z = QInZ(cid:9),
¯r(IZ) = min(cid:8)n ∈ Z>0 (cid:12)(cid:12) I(m+1)Z = QImZ , m ≥ n(cid:9).
In the rest of this section, we always assume that I is represented by a cycle Z
on X, namely, I = IZ.
Definition 3.1. We put q(I) = q(Z) = h1(OX (−Z)); this is independent of the
representation of I (cf. [25, Lemma 3.4]).
Proposition 3.2 (Cf. [26, §2]). Let qI(n) := q(I n) = qZ(n) for n ≥ 0. We have the
following.
(1) For any integer n ≥ 1, we have
2qI(n) + dimC(I n+1/QI n) = qI (n + 1) + qI(n − 1).
In particular,
nr(I) = min {n ∈ Z≥0 qI(n − 1) − qI(n) = qI(n) − qI(n + 1)}.
(2) We have
¯r(I) = min{n ∈ Z≥0 qI(n − 1) = qI(n)}.
In particular, ¯r(I) = s(Z) + 1 ≤ pg(V, p) + 1 and qI(n) = qI(s(Z)) for every
n ≥ s(Z).
Proof. We write H i(Z) := H i(OX (−Z)). Let h1, h2 ∈ H 0(Z) and Q := (h1, h2) ⊂
OV,p. Suppose that h1, h2 are sufficiently general so that Q is a minimal reduction
of I = IZ and that the following sequence is exact:
0 → OX (−(n − 1)Z)
(h1 h2)
−−−−→ OX (−nZ)⊕2 (−h2
h1 )
−−−→ OX(−(n + 1)Z) → 0.
Taking cohomology, we obtain the long exact sequence:
0 → I nQ → I n+1 → H 1((n − 1)Z) → H 1(nZ)⊕2 → H 1((n + 1)Z) → 0.
This yields (1). We write
dimC(I n+1/QI n) = ∆I(n − 1) − ∆I(n) ≥ 0,
where ∆I(n) = qI(n) − qI(n + 1). By Proposition 2.6 (1), ∆I (n) ≥ 0. Therefore, if
∆I (n − 1) = 0, then ∆I(n + k) = 0 for k ≥ 0. Hence we have (2).
By the argument similar to the proof of Proposition 3.2, we have
(cid:3)
6
TOMOHIRO OKUMA
Proposition 3.3 ([28, 2.9]). Let r = nr(I). Then
r(r − 1)/2 + q(r) ≤ pg(V, p).
In [28, 3.13], the hypersurface V = {xa + yb + zc = 0} ⊂ C3 with pg(V, o) =
r(r − 1)/2 are classified.
Remark 3.4. Let X → Y be the contraction of Z ⊥ (cf. Remark 2.4). Then we
obtain that ¯r(I) − 1 = min{n ∈ Z≥0 H 1(I nOY ) = 0} (cf. [23, 3.8]).
Remark 3.5. The ideal I is called the pg-ideal if q(I) = pg(V, p). It immediately
follows from Proposition 2.6 that ¯r(I) = 1 if and only if I is a pg-ideal. Moreover,
the following are equivalent (see [25, 3.10], [26, 4.1]):
• I is a pg-ideal.
• OC(−Z) ∼= OC, where C is the cohomological cycle of E.
• The Rees algebraLn≥0 I n is a Cohen-Macaulay normal domain.
The pg-ideals have nice properties and studied in [25, 26, 27]. For example, if I is
a pg-ideal and J an m-primary integrally closed ideal of OV,p, then IJ = IJ and
q(IJ) = q(J); in particular, pg-ideals form a semigroup with respect to the product.
The singularity (V, p) is said to be rational if pg(V, p) = 0. Rational surface
singularities can be characterized in many ways ([1], [12], [10], [21], [27]). We have
also a characterization in terms of the normal reduction numbers as follows.
Proposition 3.6 ([24, 1.1]). The following are equivalent:
(1) A is a rational singularity.
(2) Every m-primary integrally closed ideal in OV,p is a pg-ideal.
(3) ¯r(A) = 1.
(4) nr(A) = 1.
Remark 3.7. The singularities with ¯r(m) = 1 (m is a pg-ideal in this case) have been
characterized in [30, 5.2]. In case (V, p) is Gorenstein and pg(V, p) > 0, the condition
¯r(m) = 1 implies that (V, p) is an elliptic double point (see [26, 4.3], [23, 4.10]).
Elliptic singularities. The elliptic singularities were introduced by P. Wagreich,
and the theory of those singularities were developed by Wagreich [36], H. Laufer [11],
M. Reid [31, §4], S.S.-T. Yau [37, 38, 39, 40], M. Tomari [33, 34], and A. N´emethi
[20], Nagy -- N´emethi [17, 18].
Let Zf denote the fundamental cycle on X, namely, the minimal non-zero anti-nef
cycle. The fundamental genus pf (V, p) is defined by pf (V, p) = pa(Z) = 1 − χ(OZ).
By the Riemann-Roch formula, pf (V, p) = Zf (Zf + KX)/2 + 1. This is independent
of the choice of a resolution, and hence a topological invariant of the singularity
(V, p).
Definition 3.8. The singularity (V, p) is said to be elliptic if pf (V, p) = 1.
The following are well-known:
(1) For any positive integer m, there exists an elliptic singularity (V, p) with
pg(V, p) = m (Yau [40, §2]).
NORMAL REDUCTION NUMBERS OF NORMAL SURFACE SINGULARITIES
7
(2) For any elliptic surface singularity (V ′, p′), there exists an elliptic singularity
(V, p) with pg(V, p) = 1 such that (V ′, p′) and (V, p) have the same topological
type (Laufer [11, Theorem 4.1]).
Theorem 3.9 (See [23, §3]). If (V, p) is elliptic, then nr(V, p) = ¯r(V, p) = 2. In
fact, s(W ) = 1 for any (Y, W ) ∈ A′.
The point of the proof of Theorem 3.9 is as follows. Using Yau's elliptic sequences
and Rohr's vanishing theorem ([32]), we have
Proposition 3.10 (cf. [23, 3.11]). If (V, p) is elliptic and W > 0 is a cycle on X
such that OX (−W ) has no fixed component, then h1(OX (−W )) = h1(OCW ), where
CW is the cohomological cycle of W ⊥.
This proposition implies that h1(OCZ ) = qZ(n) for n ≥ 1 (take W = nZ). If I is
not a pg-ideal, then s(Z) = 1, and ¯r(I) = 2 by Proposition 3.2 (2).
Proposition 3.11 (cf. [23, 3.12]). If (V, p) is elliptic, then q(A) = q(A′).
Proof. By Proposition 2.7, there exist a resolution Y and cycles W0, . . . , Wpg(V,p)
on Y such that q(Wi) = i. Since s(Wi) = 1, Proposition 2.6 and 3.10 imply that
OY (−2Wi) is generated and q(Wi) = q(2Wi).
(cid:3)
Problem 3.12. Characterize the singularities (V, p) with ¯r(V, p) = 2. Is the converse
of Theorem 3.9 true?
We define a topological invariant min-pg(V, p) to be the minimum of the geomet-
ric genus pg of normal complex surface singularities homeomorphic to (V, p). For
example, if (V, p) is elliptic, then ¯r(V, p)− 1 = 1 = min-pg(V, p) by Theorem 3.9 and
Laufer's result mentioned above. Let us recall that ¯r(V, p) ≤ pg(V, p) + 1 (Proposi-
tion 3.2).
Problem 3.13. For a normal complex surface singularity (V, p), does the inequality
¯r(V, p) ≤ min-pg(V, p) + 1 hold? Characterize singularities which satisfy ¯r(V, p) =
min-pg(V, p) + 1.
4. Cone-like singularities
If C is a nonsingular projective curve over C and D an ample divisor on C, then
V (C, D) := SpecLn≥0 H 0(OC(nD)) is a normal surface with at most an isolated
singularity at the "vertex"(cf. [29]). Such a singularity is called a cone singularity.
The exceptional set of the minimal resolution of V (C, D) is isomorphic to C with
self-intersection number − deg D. For example, if R = ⊕n≥0Rn is a two-dimensional
normal graded ring generated by R1 over R0 = C, then Spec R has a cone singularity.
Definition 4.1. Let π0 : X0 → V be the minimal resolution of the singularity (V, p)
and F the exceptional set of π0. We call (V, p) a cone-like singularity if F consists
of a unique smooth curve. Note that in this case (V, p) is homeomorphic to the cone
singularity (V (F,−FF ), vertex).
In the rest of this section, we always assume that (V, p) is a cone-like singularity.
Let g denote the genus of the exceptional curve F of the minimal resolution π0 : X0 →
8
TOMOHIRO OKUMA
V and let d = −F 2. Assume that g ≥ 1. Let π : X → V be any resolution with
exceptional set E as in the preceding section. Then we have a natural morphism
X → X0. We denote by E0 ⊂ X the proper transform of F ; this is the unique
irreducible exceptional curve on X with positive genus. Note that d = −Z 2
f because
F is the fundamental cycle on X0; the number d is sometimes called the degree of
(V, p).
Definition 4.2. Let C be a nonsingular projective curve. The gonality of the curve
C is the minimum of the degree of surjective morphisms from C to P1, and denoted
by gon(C). It is known that gon(F ) ≤ ⌊(g + 3)/2⌋.
Definition 4.3. For any α ∈ R, let [[α]] = min{m ∈ Z m > α}. For example,
[[2]] = [[5/2]] = 3.
We give an upper bound for ¯r(V, p) using the invariants g, d, gon(E0). Note that
g and d are topological invariant of (V, p), but gon(E0) is not.
Theorem 4.4 ([24, 3.9]). Let (V, p) be a cone-like singularity and let I = IZ be
an m-primary integrally closed ideal represented by a cycle Z on the resolution X.
Then we have the following.
(1) If ZE0 = 0, then ¯r(I) ≤ [[(2g − 2)/d]] + 1.
(2) If ZE0 < 0, then ¯r(I) ≤ [[(2g − 2)/ gon(E0)]] + 1.
In particular, ¯r(V, p) ≤ [[(2g − 2)/ min{d, gon(E0)}]] + 1.
For the proof we apply Rohr's vanishing theorem (see [24, §3] for the details).
The following example is a special case of [24, 3.10] (take b = g).
Example 4.5. Let C be a hyperelliptic curve with genus g ≥ 2 and D0 a divisor on
C which is the pull-back of a point via the double cover C → P1. Let D = gD0 and
Theorem 5.7].
V = SpecLn≥0 H 0(X,OC(nD)). Then C ∼= F ⊂ X0. We have pg(V, p) = g by [29,
If we take a general element h ∈ H 0(OX0(−F )), then divX0(h) = F + H, where
H is the non-exceptional part and F ∩ H consists of distinct 2g points P1, . . . , P2g.
We may assume that P1 + P2 ∼ D0. Let φ : X → X0 be the blowing-up with
center {P3, . . . , P2g} and let Z = (h)E, the exceptional part of divX(h). If we put
Ei = φ−1(Pi) for 3 ≤ i ≤ 2g, then Z = E0 + 2(E3 + · · · + E2g). We can see that
OX (−Z) is generated since a general element of H 0(OX (−2F )) has no zero on H.
Then we have h1(OX (−(g − 1)Z)) ≥ h1(OE0(−(g − 1)Z)) = h1(KC) = 1 and
H 1(OX (−gZ)) = 0.
It follows from Proposition 2.6 (1) and Proposition 3.2 (2)
that qZ(n) = g − n for 0 ≤ n ≤ g. Hence we have ¯r(IZ) = pg(V, p) + 1 = [[(2g −
2)/ gon(E0)]] + 1, nr(IZ) = 1, q(A) = q(A′).
Homogeneous hypersurface singularities. Assume that V ⊂ C3 is a hyper-
surface defined by a homogeneous polynomial f ∈ C[x, y, z] with degree d ≥ 3
(deg x = deg y = deg z = 1) having an isolated singularity at the origin p ∈ C3.
Then F ∼= {f = 0} ⊂ P2, g = (d − 1)(d − 2)/2. Let D = −FF . Then
V = SpecLn≥0 H 0(OC(nD)). Since m = IF , we have
3 (cid:19).
(cid:19) =(cid:18)d − n
qF (n) = h1(OY (−nF )) =Xm≥n
d−3Xm=n(cid:18)d − 1 − m
h1(OF (mD)) =
2
NORMAL REDUCTION NUMBERS OF NORMAL SURFACE SINGULARITIES
9
Hence we have nr(m) = ¯r(m) = d−1 by Proposition 3.2. By the definition, ¯r(V, p) ≥
d − 1. On the other hand, by Namba's theorem (Max Noether's theorem) [19,
Theorem 2.3.1], we have gon(F ) = d − 1. By Theorem 4.4, we have
¯r(V, p) ≤ [[(2g − 2)/(d − 1)]] + 1 = [[d − 2 − 2/(d − 1)]] + 1 = d − 1.
Hence we obtain
Theorem 4.6 ([24, 4.1]). nr(m) = ¯r(m) = nr(V, p) = ¯r(V, p) = d − 1.
Remark 4.7 (See [24, §4]). Suppose that R = ⊕n≥0Rn is a normal graded ring
generated by R1 over R0 = C and V = Spec R. Then mn = mn. Let a(R) denote
the a-invariant of R (see [2]). If Q is a minimal reduction of m generated by elements
of R1, we can see
m
a(R)+2 6= Qm
a(R)+1
and nr(m) = a(R) + 2 = ¯r(m).
If R = C[x, y, z]/(f ) as above, then a(R) = d − 3 (cf. [2, (3.1.6)]).
5. Brieskorn complete intersections
In [28], we obtained an explicit expression of ¯r(m) for Brieskorn hypersurfaces
using ring-theoretic arguments and gave a classification of Brieskorn hypersurfaces
having elliptic singularities. In this section, we extend these results to the case of
Brieskorn complete intersections, using resolution of singularities.
In the following, we assume that V ⊂ Cm is a Brieskorn complete intersection
define by the following m − 2 polynomials:
qi1xa1
1 + · · · + qimxam
m
(qij ∈ C,
i = 3, . . . , m),
(5.1)
where ai are integers such that 2 ≤ a1 ≤ · · · ≤ am. We also assume that V has an
isolated singularity at the origin p ∈ Cm. Then, since every maximal minor of the
matrix (qij) does not vanish (see [7, §7]), we may assume that
(qij) =
q1
q2
...
qm−2
0
0
...
1 pm−2
1 0 · · ·
0 1 · · ·
...
. . .
0 0 · · ·
where pi, qi 6= 0 and piqj 6= pjqi for i 6= j.
5.1. The maximal ideal cycle, the fundamental cycle, and the canonical
cycle. We summarize the results in [15] which will be used in this section; those are
a natural extension of the hypersurface case obtained by Konno and Nagashima [9].
In the following, we assume that π : X → V is the minimal good resolution. Since
(V, p) is Gorenstein, the canonical cycle ZKX is an effective cycle.
We define positive integers ℓ, ℓi, α, αi, g, gi, and λi as follows2:
,
p1
p2
...
...
ℓ := lcm(a1, . . . , am),
ℓi := lcm(a1, . . . , ai, . . . , am), where ai is omitted,
αi := ℓ/ℓi, α := α1 · · · αm, g := a1 · · · am/ℓ, gi := gαi/ai, λi := ℓ/ai.
2Using the notation of [15, §3], we have l = dm, ℓi = dim, αi = nim, λi = eim, λm = emm = em.
10
TOMOHIRO OKUMA
We easily see that the polynomials xai
m are weighted homogeneous
polynomials of degree ℓ with respect to the weights (λ1, . . . , λm). Then the weighted
dual graph of the exceptional set E is as in Figure 1, where
m−1 + qixam
i + pixam−1
E = E0 +
mXw=1
swXν=1
gwXξ=1
Ew,ν,ξ,
g denotes the genus of the central curve E0, c0 = −E2
4.4]).
0 , and cw,v = −E2
w,ν,ξ (see [15,
@GAFBECD
E0 −c0
[g]
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡
✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹
✉✉✉✉✉✉✉✉✉✉
■■■■■■■■■■
PWQVRUST
−c1,1
E1,1,1
PWQVRUST
−c1,1
E1,1,g1
PWQVRUST
−cm,1
Em,1,1
PWQVRUST
−cm,1
Em,1,gm
·
·
·
·
···
·
···
·
·
···
·
·
·
·
·
PWQVRUST
−c1,2
E1,2,1
PWQVRUST
−c1,2
E1,2,g1
PWQVRUST
−cm,2
Em,2,1
PWQVRUST
−cm,2
Em,2,gm
Figure 1.
X_Y^Z][\
−c1,s1
E1,s1,1
X_Y^Z][\
−c1,s1
E1,s1,g1
X_Y^Z][\
−cm,sm
Em,sm,1
X_Y^Z][\
−cm,sm
Em,sm,gm
g1
gm
For any Q-cycle B on X and any irreducible component F ⊂ E, let cff F (B)
denote the coefficient of F in B. Let Z (i) = (xi)E.
Theorem 5.1 ([15, 4.4]). We have the following:
0 E0 +
Z (i) = λ(i)
mXw=1
0 and the sequence {λ(i)
where λ(i)
swXν=1
gwXξ=1
λ(i)
w,ν,ξEw,ν,ξ
(1 ≤ i ≤ m),
w,ν,ξ} are determined as follows:
:= λ(i)
w,0,ξ := λi,
λ(i)
0
w,sw+1,ξ :=(1
λ(i)
λ(i)
w,ν−1,ξ = λ(i)
if w = i
if w 6= i,
0
w,ν,ξcw,ν − λ(i)
w,ν+1,ξ.
NORMAL REDUCTION NUMBERS OF NORMAL SURFACE SINGULARITIES
11
The cycle Z (i) is the smallest one among the cycles Z > 0 such that Z is anti-
[15, 2.1]). In particular, we have MX = Z (m), since
nef and cff E0(Z) = λi (cf.
λ1 ≥ · · · ≥ λm.
Theorem 5.2 ([15, 5.3]). We have
ZKX = E +
(m − 2)l
α
Z0 −
Z (w),
mXw=1
where Z0 is the anti-nef cycle such that cff E0(Z0) = α and Z0(E − E0) = 0.
Theorem 5.3 ([15, 5.1, 5.2, 5.4]). If λm ≥ α, then Zf = Z0 and
pf (V, p) =
1
2
α((m − 2)g −
(α − 1)g
l
−
gw
αw) + 1.
mXw=1
If λm ≤ α, then Zf = MX and
pf (V, p) =
1
2
λm((m − 2)g −
(2 ⌈λm/αm⌉ − 1)gm
λm
−
gw
αw) + 1.
m−1Xw=1
5.2. The normal reduction numbers. Since MX = (xm)E by Theorem 5.1,
OX (−MX ) has no fixed components; however, it is not generated in general.
Let H = divX (xm) − MX . Then E + H is simple normal crossing and the set
of the base points of the linear system OX (−M) is an empty set or {t1, . . . , tgm},
where {tξ} = Em,sm,ξ ∩ H (see Theorem 5.1). Let us look in detail at a point. Let
x, y be the local coordinates at tξ ∈ X such that E = {x = 0} and H = {y = 0}.
We write ηi = λ(i)
m,sm,ξ and δ = ηm−1 − ηm. Then δ ≥ 0 and mOX,tξ = (xm−1, xm) =
(xηmy, xηm−1) = xηm(y, xδ).
Proposition 5.4 ([15, 6.4]). The following conditions are equivalent:
(1) δ = 0
(2) The base points of the linear system OX (−M) on E is empty.
If δ > 0, each base point can be resolved by a succession of δ blowing-ups at the
intersection of the exceptional set and the proper transform of H.
Wi = φ∗Z (i)
for i 6= m, Wm = MY = φ∗Z (m) + KY /X,
Let φ : Y → X be the minimal morphism such that mOY is invertible and let
F = φ−1(E). Let Wi = (xi)F (i = 1, . . . , m), and let MY denote the maximal ideal
cycle on Y and HY the proper transform of H on Y . Then
(5.2)
where KY /X = KY − φ∗KX . Now, m is represented by MY and mn = InMY . Fix an
irreducible component Fξ ⊂ F intersecting HY . For any cycle W on Y , we write
γ(W ) = cff Fξ(W ). Note that γ(MY ) is independent of the choice of a component
intersecting HY (see Theorem 5.1) and
(5.3)
Lemma 5.5. Let (u1, . . . , um) ∈ (Z≥0)m. For any positive integer n,
n − (um−1 + um)
for i 6= m, γ(Wm) = γ(MY ) = ηm + δ = ηm−1.
if and only if
γ(Wi) = ηi
.
ui
ai ≥
m−2Xi=1
am−1
mYi=1
xui
i ∈ mn
12
TOMOHIRO OKUMA
i=1 xui
i )F = W :=Pm
Proof. We have (Qm
i ∈ mn
if and only if γ(W ) ≥ γ(nMY ). Clearly, if W ≥ nMY , then γ(W ) ≥ γ(nMY ). So
we show the converse. Let W − nMY = D1 − D2, where D1 and D2 are effective
cycles without common components. By the assumption, D2 has no components of
F intersecting HY . Thus MY D2 = 0. Then 0 ≤ D1D2 − D2
2 = W D2 ≤ 0. Hence
D2 = 0. We have proved the claim.
i=1 uiWi. First we show thatQm
i=1 xui
We have the following (see [9, Lemma 1.2 (4)] for the first equality):
(5.4)
Then we have
ηi = λi/αm = ℓ/aiαm (1 ≤ i ≤ m − 1).
γ(W ) − γ(nMY ) =
=
This implies the assertion.
m−1Xi=1
αm m−2Xi=1
l
uiηi + umηm−1 − nηm−1
ui
ai
+
um−1 + um − n
am−1
! .
(cid:3)
(cid:8)xai
m−1 + qixam
m i = 1, . . . , m − 2(cid:9) defining V ⊂ Cm. For simplicity, let P
Let P ⊂ A := C[x1, . . . , xm] denote the ideal generated by the polynomials
i + pixam−1
also denote the ideal in C{x1, . . . , xm} generated by these polynomials; so OV,p =
C{x1, . . . , xm}/P . We easily see the following (cf. [22, Theorem 3.1]).
Lemma 5.6. For any 1 ≤ i ≤ m, the quotient ring A/(P + (xi)) is reduced.
Proposition 5.7. For n ∈ Z≥0, let In ⊂ OV,p be an ideal generated by monomials
i=1 xui
i
such that
Qm
ui
ai ≥
(n/ηm−1) − (um−1 + um)
am−1
.
m−2Xi=1
Then Inηm−1 = mn for n ∈ Z≥0. In particular, mn is generated by monomials.
Proof. First we show that G :=Ln≥0 In/In+1 is reduced. It follows from (5.3) and
(5.4) that the inequality is equivalent to the following (cf. the proof of Lemma 5.5):
(5.5)
γ mYi=1
i !F! =
xui
m−1Xi=1
uiηi + umηm−1 ≥ n.
Therefore the filtration {In}n∈Z≥0 is induced from the weight filtration of the power
series ring C{x1, . . . , xm} with weight vector (η1, ..., ηm−1, ηm−1) ∈ Zm. Let I ⊂ A =
C[x1, . . . , xm] denote the ideal generated by the leading form, with respect to these
is complete intersection and isomorphic to G (cf. the proof of [22, Theorem 2.6]).
If am−1 = am, then G = A/P . If am−1 < am, then G ∼= (A/P + (xm))[xm], and thus
G is reduced by Lemma 5.6.
ξ=1 Fξ, the sum of the irreducible components of F intersecting HY .
From (5.5), every h ∈ In satisfies (h)F ≥ nC. Now we can apply Lemma 2.9. Since
i + pixam−1
weights, of the polynomials (cid:8)xai
Let C =Pgm
ηm−1eC = MY , we obtain that Inηm−1 = mn.
m−1 + qixam
m i = 1, . . . , m − 2(cid:9). Then A/I
(cid:3)
NORMAL REDUCTION NUMBERS OF NORMAL SURFACE SINGULARITIES
13
Let Q = (xm−1, xm) ⊂ OV,p. Then xai
reduction of m (cf. [5, 8.3.6]).
i ∈ Q for every i, and thus Q is a minimal
Theorem 5.8. We have the following.
(1)
nr(m) = ¯r(m) =$am−1
(2) The image of the monomialsQm−2
i=1 xui
i
ai − 1
ai % .
m−2Xi=1
such that
ui
ai ≥
n + 1
am−1
m−2Xi=1
and 0 ≤ ui ≤ ai − 1
(i = 1, . . . , m − 2)
in the vector space mn+1/Qmn form a basis. In particular, dimC(mn+1/Qmn)
is a non-increasing function of n.
Proof. Note that Qmn and mn+1 are generated by monomials for every n ≥ 0 by
Proposition 5.7. Let N = (cid:4)am−1Pm−2
mn+1 for n ≥ N. Let v =Qm
i=1 (ai − 1)/ai(cid:5). First we prove that Qmn =
i ∈ mn+1. By Lemma 5.5, we have
n − (um−1 + um − 1)
n + 1 − (um−1 + um)
i=1 xui
=
.
am−1
am−1
ui
ai ≥
m−2Xi=1
Therefore, if um−1 ≥ 1 or um ≥ 1, we have v/xm−1 ∈ mn or v/xm ∈ mn, and hence
v ∈ Qmn. We consider the case that um−1 = um = 0 and ui ≥ ai for some 1 ≤ i ≤
m − 2; we may assume that i = 1. Then it follows that xu1
m−1 , xam
m ),
since xa1
i ∈ Qmn.
Let w′ = w1/xm−1 = (xu1−a1
m = 0. We show that w1 := (xu1−a1
1 +p1xam−1
m−1 +q1xam
1 ∈ xu1−a1
m−1 )Qm−2
xam−1
xam−1−1
m−1
i . Since
i=2 xui
i=2 xui
(xam−1
1
1
1
)Qm−2
u1 − a1
a1
+
ui
ai ≥
n + 1
am−1 − 1 =
n − (am−1 − 1)
am−1
,
m−2Xi=2
1
xam
we have w′ ∈ mn by Lemma 5.5. Thus w1 = xm−1w′ ∈ Qmn. In a similar way,
≥ n−(am−1)
we also have that w2 := (xu1−a1
.
Hence we obtain that v ∈ (w1, w2) ⊂ Qmn. Next assume that um−1 = um = 0 and
ui < ai for 1 ≤ i ≤ m − 2. Then we have
ai − 1
ai ≥
i ∈ Qmn, since n−(am−1−1)
n + 1
am−1
ui
ai ≥
i=2 xui
m )Qm−2
m−2Xi=1
m−2Xi=1
am−1
am−1
However this implies that n ≤ N −1. Hence we obtain that Qmn = mn+1 for n ≥ N.
Next we prove that QmN −1 6= mN . Let v :=Qm−2
. Then v 6∈ Q, because
OV,p/Q = C{x1, . . . , xm}/(xa1
i=1 xai−1
.
i
1 , . . . , xam−2
m−2 , xm−1, xm). However, since
ai − 1
ai ≥
am−1
N
,
m−2Xi=1
we have v ∈ mN by Lemma 5.5. Hence we obtain that ¯r(m) = N.
14
TOMOHIRO OKUMA
From the arguments above, we see that (2) holds, because any non-trivial linear
1 , . . . , xam−2
combinations of those monomials is not in the ideal P +(xm−1, xm) = (xa1
Since dimC(mn+1/Qmn) is a non-increasing function of n, we have nr(m) = ¯r(m) (cf.
Proposition 3.2).
(cid:3)
m−2 , xm−1, xm).
Example 5.9. If m = 3, we have
nr(m) =(cid:22) a2(a1 − 1)
dimC(mn+1/Qmn) = ♯(cid:26)u ∈ Z(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)
a1
(cid:23) ,
= max(cid:18)a1 −(cid:24)a1(n + 1)
a2
a1(n + 1)
a2
≤ u ≤ a1 − 1(cid:27)
(cid:25) , 0(cid:19) .
The formula for q(m) in [28, 3.8] is generalized as follows.
Proposition 5.10. Let p(n + 1) = dimC(mn+1/Qmn) and q(n) = h1(OY (−nMY ))
for n ≥ 0. Then we have the following:
(M 2
q(n) = pg(V, p) +
Y − MY KY ) +
(n + 1 − i)p(i).
n
2
nXi=1
(Note that the same formula holds for any normal surface singularity.)
Proof. It is well-known that the multiplicity of OV,p coincides with dimC OV,p/Q
(e.g., [5, 11.2.2]). Thus we have p(1) = dimC(m/Q) = −M 2
Y − 1. From the exact
sequence
0 → OY (−MY ) → OY → OMY → 0,
we have
q(1) − q(0) = χ(OMY ) − 1 = χ(OMY ) + M 2
Y + p(1) =
1
2
(M 2
Y − MY KY ) + p(1).
For n ≥ 1, it follows from Proposition 3.2 (1) that
1
2
q(n) − q(n − 1) = q(1) − q(0) +
p(i) =
nXi=2
(M 2
Y − MY KY ) +
p(i).
nXi=1
Hence we obtain
q(n) − q(0) =
Remark 5.11. The invariant M 2
follows. First we have M 2
hand, from (5.2), we have
M 2
Y + MY KY = M 2
n
2
(M 2
Y − MY KY ) +
(n + 1 − i)p(i).
nXi=1
Y = − mult(V, p) = −Qm−2
X + MX KX + 2(KY /X)2 = 2pa(MX ) − 2 − 2δgm.
Y − MY KY can be computed from a1, . . . , am as
i=1 ai (see [15, 6.3]). On the other
(cid:3)
We have seen a formula for pa(MX ) in Theorem 5.3.
NORMAL REDUCTION NUMBERS OF NORMAL SURFACE SINGULARITIES
15
5.3. Elliptic singularities of Brieskorn type. We classify the exponents (a1, . . . , am)
such that (V, p) is elliptic, applying the formula for ¯r(m).
Theorem 5.12. (V, p) is elliptic if and only if (a1, . . . , am) is one of the following.
(1) (a1, a2, a3) = (2, 3, a), a ≥ 6.
(2) (a1, a2, a3) = (2, 4, a), a ≥ 4.
(3) (a1, a2, a3) = (2, 5, a), 5 ≤ a ≤ 9.
(4) (a1, a2, a3) = (3, 3, a), a ≥ 3.
(5) (a1, a2, a3) = (3, 4, a), 4 ≤ a ≤ 5.
(6) (a1, a2, a3, a4) = (2, 2, 2, a), a ≥ 2.
Proof. For the case (1) -- (6) in the theorem, we can check that α ≥ λm and obtain
pf (V, p) = 1 using Theorem 5.3.
Assume that (V, p) is elliptic. By Theorem 3.9 and Theorem 5.8, we have
3 > am−1
ai − 1
ai ≥ am−1(m − 2)/2 ≥ m − 2.
m−2Xi=1
Hence m ≤ 4. We first consider the case m = 4. We have a3 < 3, and thus
a1 = a2 = a3 = 2. Then α/λ4 = a4/2 ≥ 1 and pf (V, p) = 1 by Theorem 5.3,
Next assume that m = 3. Then we have ¯r(m) = (cid:22)(a1 − 1)a2
(cid:23) ≤ 2, and thus
(a1 − 1)(a2 − 3) ≤ 2. If a2 = 2, then a1 = 2 and (V, p) is a rational. Hence a2 ≥ 3
and the list of (a1, a2) is as follows:
a1
(2, 3), (2, 4), (2, 5), (3, 3), (3, 4).
We can see that α ≥ λ3 for those cases. So it follows from Theorem 5.3 that
1
2 {a1a2 − a1 − a2 − (2 ⌈lcm(a1, a2)/a3⌉ − 1) gcd(a1, a2)} + 1.
pf (V, p) =
Let us look at each case.
Hence a3 ≥ 6. We have α/λ3 = a3/ gcd(6, a3) and pf (V, p) = 1.
α/λ3 = a3/2 otherwise, and pf (V, p) = 1.
(1) The case where (a1, a2) = (2, 3). We know that (V, p) is rational if a3 ≤ 5.
(2) The case where (a1, a2) = (2, 4), a3 ≥ 4. We have α/λ3 = a3/4 if 4 a3,
(3) The case where (a1, a2) = (2, 5), a3 ≥ 5. We have α/λ3 = a3/ gcd(10, a3)
(4) The case where (a1, a2) = (3, 3), a3 ≥ 3. We have α/λ3 = a3/3 and pf (V, p) =
(5) The case where (a1, a2) = (3, 4), a3 ≥ 4. We have α/λ3 = a3/ gcd(12, a3)
and pf (V, p) = 3 − ⌈10/a3⌉. Sine pf (V, p) = 1, we have a3 ≤ 9.
1 for all a3 ≥ 3.
and pf (V, p) = 4 − ⌈12/a3⌉. Sine pf (V, p) = 1, we have a3 ≤ 5.
(cid:3)
Hence we have proved the theorem.
From the proof of Theorem 5.12, we obtain that ¯r(m) = 2 and pf (V, p) ≥ 2 if
(a1, a2, a3) = (2, 5, a) with a ≥ 10 or (3, 4, a) with a ≥ 6. For the cases (2, 5, a) with
a ≥ 10 and (3, 4, a) with a ≥ 8, letting Q = (y, z2) and I = Q, we have ¯r(I) ≥ 3.
Hence we obtain the following.
16
TOMOHIRO OKUMA
Proposition 5.13 ([28, 4.5]). ¯r(V, p) = 2 if and only if pf (V, p) = 1, except for the
cases (a1, . . . , am) = (3, 4, 6), (3, 4, 7).
For the reader's convenience, we put some information about the two exceptional
cases above. Both singularities have pg = 3 and pf = 2. The weighted dual graph
Γ1 (resp. Γ2) of {x3 + y4 + z6 = 0} (resp. {x3 + y4 + z7 = 0}) is as in Figure 2.
−28?9>:=;<
−28?9>:=;<
[1]
Γ1 :
−28?9>:=;<
−28?9>:=;< −48?9>:=;<
−28?9>:=;< −28?9>:=;< −28?9>:=;< −28?9>:=;<
−28?9>:=;<
Γ2 :
−28?9>:=;<
−28?9>:=;<
Figure 2.
As we have seen above, the equality ¯r(V, p) = ¯r(m) does not hold in general (see
also Remark 3.7).
Problem 5.14. For a given normal surface singularity (V, p), characterize m-primary
integrally closed ideals I ⊂ OV,p (or, cycles which represent I) such that ¯r(V, p) =
¯r(I). Characterize normal surface singularities (V, p) such that ¯r(V, p) = ¯r(m).
References
[1] Michael Artin, On isolated rational singularities of surfaces, Amer. J. Math. 88 (1966), 129 --
136.
[2] Shiro Goto and Kei-ichi Watanabe, On graded rings. I, J. Math. Soc. Japan 30 (1978), no. 2,
179 -- 213.
[3] Melvin Hochster and Craig Huneke, Tight closure, invariant theory, and the Brian¸con-Skoda
theorem, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (1990), no. 1, 31 -- 116.
[4] Craig Huneke, Hilbert functions and symbolic powers, Michigan Math. J. 34 (1987), no. 2,
293 -- 318.
[5] Craig Huneke and Irena Swanson, Integral closure of ideals, rings, and modules, London
Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 336, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
2006.
[6] Shiroh Itoh, Integral closures of ideals generated by regular sequences, J. Algebra 117 (1988),
no. 2, 390 -- 401.
[7] Mark Jankins and Walter D. Neumann, Lectures on Seifert manifolds, Brandeis Lecture Notes,
vol. 2, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, 1983.
[8] Masahide Kato, Riemann-Roch theorem for strongly pseudoconvex manifolds of dimension 2,
Math. Ann. 222 (1976), no. 3, 243 -- 250.
[9] Kazuhiro Konno and Daisuke Nagashima, Maximal ideal cycles over normal surface singular-
ities of Brieskorn type, Osaka J. Math. 49 (2012), no. 1, 225 -- 245.
[10] Henry B. Laufer, On rational singularities, Amer. J. Math. 94 (1972), 597 -- 608.
[11]
[12] Joseph Lipman, Rational singularities, with applications to algebraic surfaces and unique fac-
, On minimally elliptic singularities, Amer. J. Math. 99 (1977), no. 6, 1257 -- 1295.
torization, Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. (1969), no. 36, 195 -- 279.
[13] Joseph Lipman and Bernard Teissier, Pseudorational local rings and a theorem of Brian¸con-
Skoda about integral closures of ideals, Michigan Math. J. 28 (1981), no. 1, 97 -- 116.
[14] Mousumi Mandal, Shreedevi Masuti, and J. K. Verma, Normal Hilbert polynomials: a survey,
Commutative algebra and algebraic geometry (CAAG-2010), Ramanujan Math. Soc. Lect.
Notes Ser., vol. 17, Ramanujan Math. Soc., Mysore, 2013, pp. 139 -- 166.
NORMAL REDUCTION NUMBERS OF NORMAL SURFACE SINGULARITIES
17
[15] Fan-Ning Meng and Tomohiro Okuma, The maximal ideal cycles over complete intersection
surface singularities of Brieskorn type, Kyushu J. Math. 68 (2014), no. 1, 121 -- 137.
[16] J´anos Nagy, Holes in possible values of h1 and geometric genus, arXiv:1911.07300.
[17] J´anos Nagy and Andr´as N´emethi, On the topology of elliptic singularities, arXiv:1901.06224.
[18]
[19] Makoto Namba, Families of meromorphic functions on compact Riemann surfaces, Lecture
, The Abel map for surface singularities III. Elliptic germs, arXiv:1902.07493.
Notes in Mathematics, vol. 767, Springer, Berlin, 1979.
[20] Andr´as N´emethi, "Weakly" elliptic Gorenstein singularities of surfaces, Invent. Math. 137
(1999), no. 1, 145 -- 167.
[21]
, Links of rational singularities, L-spaces and LO fundamental groups, Invent. Math.
210 (2017), no. 1, 69 -- 83.
[22] Walter D. Neumann and Jonathan Wahl, Complete intersection singularities of splice type as
universal abelian covers, Geom. Topol. 9 (2005), 699 -- 755 (electronic).
[23] Tomohiro Okuma, Cohomology of ideals in elliptic surface singularities, Illinois J. Math. 61
(2017), no. 3-4, 259 -- 273.
[24] Tomohiro Okuma, Kei-ichi Watanabe, and Ken-ichi Yoshida, The normal reduction number
of two-dimensional cone-like singularities, arXiv:1909.13190.
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
, Good ideals and pg-ideals in two-dimensional normal singularities, Manuscripta Math.
150 (2016), no. 3-4, 499 -- 520.
, Rees algebras and pg-ideals in a two-dimensional normal local domain, Proc. Amer.
Math. Soc. 145 (2017), no. 1, 39 -- 47.
, A characterization of two-dimensional rational singularities via core of ideals, J.
Algebra 499 (2018), 450 -- 468.
, Normal reduction numbers for normal surface singularities with application to elliptic
singularities of Brieskorn type, Acta Math. Vietnam. 44 (2019), no. 1, 87 -- 100.
[29] H. Pinkham, Normal surface singularities with C ∗ action, Math. Ann. 227 (1977), no. 2,
183 -- 193.
[30] Tony Puthenpurakal, Keiichi Watanabe, and Ken-ichi Yoshida, The strong Rees property of
powers of the maximal ideal and Takahashi-Dao's question, Journal of Algebra, In Press,
arXiv:1708.06090.
[31] M. Reid, Chapters on algebraic surfaces, Complex algebraic geometry, IAS/Park City Math.
Ser., vol. 3, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1997, pp. 3 -- 159.
[32] A. Rohr, A vanishing theorem for line bundles on resolutions of surface singularities, Abh.
Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 65 (1995), 215 -- 223.
[33] Masataka Tomari, A geometric characterization of normal two-dimensional singularities of
[34]
multiplicity two with pa ≤ 1, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 20 (1984), no. 1, 1 -- 20.
297 -- 354.
, A pg-formula and elliptic singularities, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 21 (1985), no. 2,
[35] Masataka Tomari and Kei-ichi Watanabe, Filtered rings, filtered blowing-ups and normal two-
dimensional singularities with "star-shaped" resolution, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 25 (1989),
no. 5, 681 -- 740.
[36] Philip Wagreich, Elliptic singularities of surfaces, Amer. J. Math. 92 (1970), 419 -- 454.
[37] Stephen Shing Toung Yau, Gorenstein singularities with geometric genus equal to two, Amer.
J. Math. 101 (1979), no. 4, 813 -- 854.
[38]
[39]
[40]
, Hypersurface weighted dual graphs of normal singularities of surfaces, Amer. J. Math.
101 (1979), no. 4, 761 -- 812.
, Normal two-dimensional elliptic singularities, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 254 (1979),
117 -- 134.
, On maximally elliptic singularities, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 257 (1980), no. 2, 269 --
329.
18
TOMOHIRO OKUMA
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Yamagata University, Yamagata, 990-
8560, Japan.
E-mail address: [email protected]
|
1709.00519 | 1 | 1709 | 2017-09-02T02:12:27 | Finite generation of the algebra of type A conformal blocks via birational geometry | [
"math.AG",
"math.QA",
"math.RT"
] | We study birational geometry of the moduli space of parabolic bundles over a projective line, in the framework of Mori's program. We show that the moduli space is a Mori dream space. As a consequence, we obtain the finite generation of the algebra of type A conformal blocks. Furthermore, we compute the H-representation of the effective cone which was previously obtained by Belkale. For each big divisor, the associated birational model is described in terms of moduli space of parabolic bundles. | math.AG | math |
FINITE GENERATION OF THE ALGEBRA OF TYPE A CONFORMAL BLOCKS
VIA BIRATIONAL GEOMETRY
HAN-BOM MOON AND SANG-BUM YOO
ABSTRACT. We study birational geometry of the moduli space of parabolic bundles over a
projective line, in the framework of Mori's program. We show that the moduli space is a
Mori dream space. As a consequence, we obtain the finite generation of the algebra of type
A conformal blocks. Furthermore, we compute the H-representation of the effective cone
which was previously obtained by Belkale. For each big divisor, the associated birational
model is described in terms of moduli space of parabolic bundles.
1. INTRODUCTION
The aim of this paper is twofold. First of all, we prove the following finiteness theorem.
Theorem 1.1 (Theorem 5.3). The algebra of type A conformal blocks over a projective line is
finitely generated.
Conformal blocks introduced by Tsuchiya, Kanie, Ueno and Yamada to construct a two-
dimensional chiral conformal field theory (WZW model) ([TK88, TUY89, Uen08]). For
each (C, p) ∈ Mg,n, a simple Lie algebra g, a nonnegative integer (cid:96), and a collection
of dominant integral weights (cid:126)λ := (λ1, λ2,··· , λn) such that (λi, θ) ≤ (cid:96) where θ is the
highest root, they constructed a finite dimensional vector space V†
(cid:96),(cid:126)λ so-called the space of
conformal blocks or the space of vacua.
Conformal blocks have several interesting connections in algebraic geometry.
It is
known that V†
(cid:96),(cid:126)λ can be naturally identified with the space of global sections, so-called
generalized theta functions, of a certain line bundle on the moduli space of parabolic
principal G-bundles ([Pau96, LS97]). They can be also regarded as a quantum general-
ization of invariant factors ([Bel08]). Recently, conformal blocks have been studied to
construct positive vector bundles on M0,n (see [BGM16] and references therein).
We will focus on C = P1 and g = slr case. There is a map
which defines a commutative Pic(Mp(r, 0))-graded C-algebra structure on
V†
(cid:96),(cid:126)λ
⊗ V†
(cid:96)+m,(cid:126)λ+(cid:126)µ
m,(cid:126)µ → V†
(cid:77)
V†
(cid:96),(cid:126)λ
V† :=
where Mp(r, 0) is the moduli stack of rank r, degree 0 parabolic bundles on P1. V† is called
the algebra of conformal blocks and naturally identified with the Cox ring of Mp(r, 0).
(cid:96),(cid:126)λ
Date: September 5, 2017.
1
2
HAN-BOM MOON AND SANG-BUM YOO
Despite of many results on the structure of V†, many fundamental questions such as the
finite generation of V†, are still open. See [Man09, Man13, Man16, MY16] for some partial
results. To prove the finite generation of V†, we study birational geometry of Mp(r, 0, a),
the moduli space of rank r, degree 0, a-semistable parabolic bundles on P1, in the frame-
work of Mori's program.
For a normal Q-factorial projective variety X with trivial irregularity, Mori's program,
or log minimal model program, consists of the following three steps.
(1) Compute the effective cone Eff(X) in N1(X)R.
(2) For each integral divisor D ∈ Eff(X), compute the projective model
X(D) := Proj
H0(X,O(mD)).
(cid:77)
m≥0
(3) Study the rational contraction X (cid:57)(cid:57)(cid:75) X(D).
However, even among very simple varieties such as a blow-up of Pn along some points,
there are examples that Mori's program cannot be completed because of two kinds of in-
finity: There may be infinitely many rational contractions, and more seriously, the section
m≥0 H0(X,O(mD)) may not be finitely generated and thus X(D) is not a projective
ring(cid:76)
variety.
A Mori dream space ([HK00]), MDS for short, is a special kind of variety that has no
such technical difficulties to run Mori's program: The effective cone is polyhedral, there
is a finite chamber structure which corresponds to finitely many different projective mod-
els, and every divisor has a finitely generated section ring. In Section 5, we show that
Mp(r, 0, a) is a MDS. On the other hand, under some assumption, V† can be identified
with Cox(Mp(r, 0, a)). We obtain the finite generation by [HK00, Proposition 2.9].
Even for a MDS X, it is very difficult to complete Mori's program if ρ(X) ≥ 3 (see
[CM17] for an example). As the second main result, we complete Mori's program for
Mp(r, 0, a). The rank two case was done in [MY16].
Theorem 1.2. Assume n > 2r. Let M := Mp(r, 0, a) for a general effective parabolic weight a.
(1) (Proposition 6.3) If ρ(M) = (r − 1)n + 1, which is the possible maximum, the effective
cone Eff(M) is the intersection of an explicit finite set of half-planes in N1(M)R. In par-
ticular, for any collection of partitions λ1,··· , λn, d ≥ 0 and 0 < s < r such that the
Gromov-Witten invariant (cid:104)ωλ1, ωλ2,··· , ωλn(cid:105)d of Grassmannian Gr(s, r) is one, there is
a hyperplane supporting Eff(M).
(2) (Proposition 6.1, Section 6.3) For any D ∈ intEff(M), M(D) = Mp(r, 0, b) for some par-
abolic weight b. The projective models associated to facets of Eff(M) can be also described
in terms of moduli spaces of parabolic bundles.
(3) For a general D ∈ intEff(M), the rational contraction M (cid:57)(cid:57)(cid:75) M(D) is a composition of
smooth blow-ups and blow-downs.
Remark 1.3.
(1) When n is small, we may think of M as the target of an algebraic fiber
space Mq(r, 0, a(cid:48)) → M where the domain is the moduli space of parabolic bundles
with larger number of parabolic points. Thus the Mori's program for M becomes
a part of that of Mq(r, 0, a(cid:48)).
FINITE GENERATION OF THE ALGEBRA OF CONFORMAL BLOCKS
3
(2) The H-representation in Item (1) was obtained by Belkale in [Bel08, Theorem 2.8]
in a greater generality by a different method. Our approach using wall-crossings is
independent from his idea and is elementary. On the other hand, his result indeed
tells us a strong positivity: Any integral divisor class in Eff(M) is effective.
(3) Once (2) is shown, (3) follows from a result of Thaddeus ([Tha96, Section 7]).
We leave a brief outline of the proof of Theorem 1.1. For simplicity, suppose that n
is large enough. The main technique we employ is a careful analysis of wall-crossings.
The moduli space Mp(r, 0, a) depends on a choice of a parabolic weight a. For two gen-
eral parabolic weights a and b, there is a birational map Mp(r, 0, a) (cid:57)(cid:57)(cid:75) Mp(r, 0, b) pro-
vided stable loci of these two moduli spaces are nonempty. Then the birational map can
be decomposed into finitely many explicit blow-ups and blow-downs, and the change
can be measured explicitly. Furthermore, when a is sufficiently small, then Mp(r, 0, a) ∼=
Fl(V )n//LSLr for some explicit linearization L. By analysing the geometry of the GIT quo-
tient and wall-crossings, we obtain the canonical divisor of Mp(r, 0, a) where a is domi-
nant in the sense that Cox(Mp(r, 0)) = Cox(Mp(r, 0, a)). We show that after finitely many
flips, the anticanonical divisor −K becomes big and nef. Because the moduli space is
smooth, it is of Fano type. Therefore it is a MDS.
The method of the proof does not provide any explicit set of generators. It is an inter-
esting problem to construct a generating set. Several results of Manon ([Man09, Man13,
Man16]) suggest the next conjecture. Note that the effective cone is polyhedral, so there
are finitely many extremal rays.
Conjecture 1.4. The algebra V† of conformal blocks is generated by the set of effective divisors
whose numerical classes are the first integral points of extremal rays of Eff(Mp(r, 0)).
1.1. Organization of the paper. We begin in Section 2 by recalling some preliminaries on
the moduli space of parabolic bundles and deformation theory. In Section 3, we identify
moduli spaces of parabolic bundles with small weights with elementary GIT quotients.
Section 4 reviews wall-crossing analysis. In Section 5, we prove Theorem 1.1. Finally in
Section 6, we prove Theorem 1.2.
Notations and conventions. We work on an algebraically closed field C of characteristic
zero. Unless there is an explicit statement, we will fix n distinct points p = (p1,··· , pn) on
P1. These points are called parabolic points. The number n of parabolic points is always at
least three. [r] denotes the set {1, 2,··· , r}. To minimize the introduction of cumbersome
notation, mainly we will discuss parabolic bundles with full flags only, except Section 6.3
on degenerations of moduli spaces. The readers may easily generalize most part of the
paper, to the partial flag cases. In many literatures the dual V
(cid:96),(cid:126)λ has been denoted
by conformal blocks.
(cid:96),(cid:126)λ of V†
Acknowledgements. The authors thank Prakash Belkale and Young-Hoon Kiem for their
comments and suggestions on an earlier draft. The first author thanks Jinhyung Park for
helpful conversations.
4
HAN-BOM MOON AND SANG-BUM YOO
2. MODULI SPACE OF PARABOLIC BUNDLES
In this section, we give a brief review on parabolic bundles and their moduli spaces.
2.1. Parabolic bundles and their moduli spaces.
Definition 2.1. Fix parabolic points p = (p1, p2,··· , pn) on P1. A rank r quasi parabolic
bundle over (P1, p) is a collection of data E := (E,{W i•}) where:
(1) E is a rank r vector bundle over P1;
(2) For each 1 ≤ i ≤ n, W i• ∈ Fl(Epi). In other words, W i• is a strictly increasing
r = Epi. In particular,
(cid:40) ··· (cid:40) W i
r−1
(cid:40) W i
(cid:40) W i
1
filtration of subspaces 0 (cid:40) W i
dim W i
j = j.
2
Let Mp(r, d) be the moduli stack of rank r, degree d quasi parabolic bundles over (P1, p).
This moduli stack is highly non-separated Artin stack. To obtain a proper moduli space,
as in the case of moduli spaces of ordinary vector bundles, we introduce the parabolic
slope and a stability condition, and collect semi-stable objects only. One major difference
here is that there are many different ways to define stability while there is a standard one
in the case of ordinary bundles.
(1) A parabolic weight is a collection a = (a1•, a2•,··· , an• ) of strictly de-
r ≥ 0) of length r. Let
r−1 > ai
Definition 2.2.
aj :=(cid:80)n
j and a :=(cid:80)r−1
creasing sequences ai• = (1 > ai
j=1 aj.
1 > ··· > ai
(2) A parabolic bundle is a collection E := (E,{W i•}, a).
Definition 2.3. Let E = (E,{W i•}, a) be a parabolic bundle.
i=1 ai
(1) The parabolic degree of E is
pdeg E := deg E + a.
(2) The parabolic slope of E is µ(E) = pdeg E/rk E.
Let E = (E,{W i•}, a) be a parabolic bundle of rank r. For each subbundle F ⊂ E,
there is a natural induced flag structure WF
i• on Fpi. More precisely, let (cid:96) be the smallest
(cid:96) ∩ Fpi. Furthermore, we can
i
index such that dim(W i
j = W i
define the induced parabolic weight b = (bi•) on Fpi as bi
(cid:96). This collection of data
j = ai
i•}, b) is called a parabolic subbundle of E. Similarly, one can define the
F := (F,{WF
induced flag W/F i• on E/Fpi, the inherited parabolic weight c, and the quotient parabolic
bundle Q := (E/F,{W/F i•}, c).
Definition 2.4. A parabolic bundle E = (E,{W i•}, a) is a-(semi)-stable if for every parabolic
subbundle F of E, µ(F)(≤) < µ(E).
(cid:96) ∩ Fpi) = j. Then WF
Let Mp(r, d, a) be the moduli space of S-equivalent classes of rank r, topological degree
d a-semistable parabolic bundles over (P1, p). It is an irreducible normal projective variety
(cid:1) − r2 + 1 if it is nonempty ([MS80, Theorem 4.1]).
of dimension n(cid:0)r
2
FINITE GENERATION OF THE ALGEBRA OF CONFORMAL BLOCKS
5
Remark 2.5. For a general parabolic weight a for a rank r quasi parabolic bundle, we can
define the normalized weight a(cid:48) as a(cid:48)i
r. Then it is straightforward to check that
the map
j − ai
j = ai
Mp(r, d, a) → Mp(r, d, a(cid:48))
(E,{W i•}, a)
(cid:55)→ (E,{W i•}, a(cid:48))
is an isomorphism. Thus we assume that any given parabolic weight is normalized.
Finally, we leave two notions on weight data.
Definition 2.6.
(1) A parabolic weight a is effective if Mp(r, d, a) is nonempty.
(2) A parabolic weight a is general if the a-semistability coincides with the a-stability.
Remark 2.7. The notion of parabolic bundles can be naturally generalized to parabolic
bundles with partial flags. For notational simplicity, we do not describe them here. Con-
sult [MS80, Definition 1.5].
In this paper, we use moduli spaces of parabolic bundles
with partial flags only in Section 6.3 to describe projective models associated to non-big
divisors. A reader who is not interested in this topic can ignore partial flag cases.
flag variety Fl(V ) is embedded into (cid:81)r−1
representation Vλ with the highest weight λ =(cid:80)r−1
2.2. The algebra of conformal blocks. For an r-dimensional vector space V , the full
j=1 Gr(j, V ), and every line bundle on Fl(V ) is
the restriction of O(b•) := O(b1, b2,··· , br−1). By Borel-Weil theorem, if all bi's are non-
negative, or equivalently O(b•) is effective, then H0(Fl(V ),O(b•)) is the irreducible SLr-
i=1 br−iωi. Fλ denotes O(b•).
Recall that Mp(r, 0) is the moduli stack of rank r, degree 0 quasi parabolic bundles over
(P1, p). The Picard group of Mp(r, 0) is isomorphic to
ZL × n(cid:89)
i=1
Pic(Fl(V ))
([LS97]). In particular, its Picard number is (r − 1)n + 1.
The generator L is the determinant line bundle on Mp(r, 0) which has the following
functorial property: For any family of rank r quasi parabolic bundles E = (E,{W i•}) over
S, consider the determinant bundle LS := det R1πS∗E ⊗ (det πS∗E)−1, where πS : X × S →
S is the projection to S. If p : S → Mp(r, 0) is the functorial morphism, then p∗(L) = LS.
The line bundle L has a unique section denoted by Θ. This section Θ vanishes exactly on
the locus of E = (E,{W i•}) such that E (cid:54)= Or ([BGM15, Section 10.2]).
Any line bundle F ∈ Pic(Mp(r, 0)) can be written uniquely as L(cid:96) ⊗ ⊗n
i=1Fλi where Fλi is
a line bundle associated to the integer partition λi. The space of global sections H0(F ) is
identified with the space of conformal blocks V†
(cid:96),(λ1,··· ,λn) ([Pau96, Corollary 6.7]).
1 > (cid:96) for some 1 ≤ i ≤ n.
1,(cid:126)0 is generated by Θ. In general, V†
In particular, V†
(cid:96)+1,(cid:126)λ given by the multiplication of
∼= V SLr
i=1 Vλi)SLr ([BGM15,
Θ. Moreover, when (cid:96) ≥ ((cid:80)n
:= V†
(cid:96),(cid:126)λ
(cid:96),(cid:126)λ is trivial if λi
(cid:44)→ V†
Note that there is a natural injective map V†
j=1 λi
j)/(r + 1), V†
:= ((cid:76)n
(cid:96),(cid:126)λ
(cid:80)r−1
i=1
(cid:96),(cid:126)λ
(cid:126)λ
6
HAN-BOM MOON AND SANG-BUM YOO
Proposition 1.3]). Thus spaces of conformal blocks define a filtration on V SLr
regard them as generalized invariant factors.
(cid:126)λ
and we may
The direct sum of all conformal blocks
V† :=
(cid:77)
V†
(cid:96),(cid:126)λ
has a Pic(Mp(r, 0))-graded algebra structure. This algebra V† is called the algebra of confor-
mal blocks. Note that V† is the space of all sections of line bundles on Mp(r, 0). Thus V† is
the Cox ring Cox(Mp(r, 0)) of the moduli stack Mp(r, 0).
(cid:96),(cid:126)λ
2.3. Deformation theory. To analyze wall crossings on the moduli space in detail, we em-
ploy some results from deformation theory of parabolic bundles, which was intensively
studied by Yokogawa in [Yok95]. In this section we summarize some relevant results.
Let E = (E,{W i•}, a) and F = (F,{W (cid:48)i•}, b) be two parabolic bundles. A bundle mor-
phism f : E → F is called (strongly) parabolic if f (W i
k+1.
The sheaves of parabolic morphisms and strongly parabolic morphisms are denoted by
ParHom(E,F) and SParHom(E,F) respectively. The spaces of their global sections are
denoted by ParHom(E,F) and SParHom(E,F).
Yokogawa introduced an abelian category P of parabolic OP1-modules which contains
the category of parabolic bundles as a full subcategory. P has enough injective objects,
so we can define right derived functor Exti(E,−) of ParHom(E,−). Those cohomology
groups can be described in terms of ordinary cohomology groups and behave similarly.
Lemma 2.8 ([Yok95, Theorem 3.6]).
j(≥) > bi
j ) ⊂ W (cid:48)i
k whenever ai
Exti(E,F) ∼= Hi(ParHom(E,F)).
Lemma 2.9 ([Yok95, Lemma 1.4]). The cohomology Ext1(E,F) parametrizes isomorphism classes
of parabolic extensions, which are exact sequences 0 → F → G → E → 0 in P.
Also we have 'Serre duality':
Lemma 2.10 ([Yok95, Proposition 3.7]).
Ext1−i(E,F ⊗ OP1(n − 2)) ∼= Hi(SParHom(F,E))∗.
As in the case of the moduli space of ordinary sheaves, if E ∈ Mp(r, d, a) is a-stable, then
the Zariski tangent space of Mp(r, d, a) at [E] is Ext1(E,E), and if Ext2(E,E) = 0, then the
moduli space is smooth at [E] ([Yok95, Theorem 2.4]). Since Ext2(E,E) ∼= H2(ParHom(E,E))
is an ordinary sheaf cohomology on a curve, it vanishes. Thus at [E], the moduli space is
smooth.
Proposition 2.11. If a is a general parabolic weight, then Mp(r, d, a) is a smooth variety.
3. SMALL WEIGHT CASE
When a parabolic weight a is sufficiently 'small', Mp(r, 0, a) can be constructed as an
elementary GIT quotient. This section is devoted to the study of such small weight case.
FINITE GENERATION OF THE ALGEBRA OF CONFORMAL BLOCKS
7
3.1. Moduli of parabolic bundles and GIT quotient. Let πi : Fl(V )n → Fl(V ) be the pro-
jection to the i-th factor. Then any line bundle on Fl(V )n can be described as a restriction
i O(bi•). Note that there is a natural diagonal SLr-action on Fl(V )n. The GIT
of Lb := ⊗π∗
stability with respect to Lb is well-known:
Theorem 3.1 ([Dol03, Theorem 11.1]). A point (W i•) ∈ Fl(V )n is (semi)-stable with respect to
Lb if and only if for every proper s-dimensional subspace V (cid:48) ⊂ V , the following inequality holds:
(cid:32) n(cid:88)
r−1(cid:88)
i=1
j=1
(cid:33)
jbi
j
.
(1)
1
s
j dim(W i
bi
j ∩ V (cid:48))(≤) <
1
r
n(cid:88)
r−1(cid:88)
i=1
j=1
As in the case of parabolic stability, we define some terminology related to weight data.
Definition 3.2. Let Lb be a linearization on Fl(V )n.
(1) Lb is effective if (Fl(V )n)ss(Lb) (cid:54)= ∅.
(2) Lb is general if (Fl(V )n)ss(Lb) = (Fl(V )n)s(Lb).
For a parabolic weight a, let d = (d1•, d2•,··· , dn• ) be a new collection of sequences de-
i=1 di
j
j+1. d is called the associated difference data. For d, let dj :=(cid:80)n
j − ai
j = ai
and d =(cid:80)r−1
fined by di
j=1 dj. Then aj =(cid:80)r−1
k=j dk and a =(cid:80)r−1
j=1 jdj.
Theorem 3.3. Let a be a parabolic weight and d be the associated difference data. Suppose that a
is sufficiently small in the sense that
s(cid:88)
r−1(cid:88)
(2)
j(r − s)dj +
s(r − j)dj ≤ r
j=1
j=s+1
for all 1 ≤ s ≤ r − 1. Then Mp(r, 0, a) ∼= Fl(V )n//LdSLr, where Ld := ⊗π∗
Proof. It is straightforward to check that (2) is equivalent to r(cid:80)s
i O(di•).
j=1 aj − sa ≤ r.
Let X = (Fl(V )n)ss(Ld). Consider a family of parabolic bundles E over X by taking the
trivial bundle, the restriction of the universal flag, and the parabolic weight a. We claim
that this is a family of a-semistable parabolic bundles. Let Ex = (E = V ⊗ O,{W i•}, a) be
the fiber over x ∈ X.
Let F be a rank s subbundle of E whose topological degree is negative. Let F be the
j=1 aj)/s ≤ a/r = µ(Ex). Thus F
is not a destabilizing subbundle. Since E does not have a positive degree subbundle, the
only possible destabilizing subbundle is of degree zero. This subbundle must be trivial
because it cannot have any positive degree factor.
induced parabolic subbundle. Then µ(F) ≤ (−1 +(cid:80)s
8
HAN-BOM MOON AND SANG-BUM YOO
Suppose that F = (V (cid:48) ⊗O,{W (cid:48)i•}, b) is a rank s parabolic subbundle induced by taking
an s-dimensional subspace V (cid:48) ⊂ V . Then
n(cid:88)
r−1(cid:88)
i=1
j=1
1
s
di
j dim(W i
j ∩ V (cid:48))
i=1
j=1
n(cid:88)
r(cid:88)
n(cid:88)
r(cid:88)
(cid:32) n(cid:88)
r−1(cid:88)
j=1
i=1
µ(F) =
=
1
s
1
s
≤ 1
r
ai
j dim(W i
j ∩ Fpi/W i
j−1 ∩ Fpi)
(cid:33)
j ∩ V (cid:48)/W i
j−1 ∩ V (cid:48)) =
r−1(cid:88)
(cid:32) n(cid:88)
(cid:33)
= µ(Ex).
ai
j
ai
j dim(W i
jdi
j
=
1
r
i=1
j=1
i=1
j=1
The inequality is obtained from Theorem 3.1. Therefore Ex is semistable.
By the universal property, there is an SLr-invariant morphism π : X → Mp(r, 0, a).
Therefore we have the induced map ¯π : Fl(V )n//LdSLr → Mp(r, 0, a). It is straightforward
to check that ¯π is set-theoretically injective. Since it is an injective map between two
normal varieties with the same dimension and the target space is irreducible, it is an
(cid:3)
isomorphism.
3.2. Picard group of GIT quotient. For the later use, we compute the Picard group of the
GIT quotient.
i O(bi•) such that
Proposition 3.4. Suppose that n > 2r. There is a general linearization Lb = ⊗π∗
Pic(Fl(V )n//LbSLr) is naturally identified with an index r sublattice of Pic(Fl(V )n) ∼= Z(r−1)n.
In particular, a general linearization which is very close to the symmetric linearization La with
j ≡ 1 has the property.
ai
Proof. First of all, we show that for the symmetric linearization La, the codimension of the
non-stable locus Fl(V )n \ (Fl(V )n)ss(La) is at least two. If (W i•) is not stable, then by (1),
there is an s-dimensional subspace V (cid:48) ⊂ V such that
(3)
1
s
dim(W i
j ∩ V (cid:48)) ≥ n(r − 1)
.
2
n(cid:88)
r−1(cid:88)
i=1
j=1
space V (cid:48) ⊂ V . Let (cid:101)Us ⊂ Gr(s, V ) × Fl(V )n be the space of pairs (V (cid:48), (W i•)) such that (W i•)
Let Us ⊂ Fl(V )n be the set of flags (W i•) which satisfy (3) for some s-dimensional sub-
satisfies (3) for V (cid:48). There are two projections p1 : (cid:101)Us → Gr(s, V ) and p2 : (cid:101)Us → Fl(V )n.
The codimension of each fiber of p1 in Fl(V )n is (cid:100)n(r − 1)/2 − n(s − 1)/2(cid:101) = (cid:100)n(r − s)/2(cid:101)
because on (3), the left hand side is n(s − 1)/2 for a general (W i•) and as the value of the
the codimension of (cid:101)Us is at least (cid:100)n(r − s)/2(cid:101). On the other hand, because p2((cid:101)Us) = Us,
left hand side increases by one, the codimension of the locus increases by one, too. Thus
the codimension of Us is at least (cid:100)n(r − s)/2(cid:101) − s(r − s), which is at least two for any
1 ≤ s ≤ r − 1. The non-stable locus Fl(V )n \ (Fl(V )n)ss(La) is ∪r−1
s=1Us, so it is of codimen-
sion at least two.
FINITE GENERATION OF THE ALGEBRA OF CONFORMAL BLOCKS
9
By perturbing the linearization slightly, we can obtain a general linearization Lb. The
unstable locus with respect to Lb is contained in the non-stable locus of La. Thus it is also
of codimension at least two. In particular, Pic((Fl(V )n)s(Lb)) = Pic(Fl(V )n).
Let PicSLr((Fl(V )n)s(Lb) be the group of linearizations. Then there is an exact sequence
0 → Hom(SLr, C∗) → PicSLr((Fl(V )n)s(Lb)) α→ Pic((Fl(V )n)s(Lb)) → Pic(SLr)
([Dol03, Theorem 7.2]). Furthermore, Hom(SLr, C∗) = Pic(SLr) = 0. Thus α is an isomor-
phism.
By Kempf's descent lemma ([DN89, Theorem 2.3]), an SLr-linearized line bundle L on
(Fl(V )n)s(Lb) descends to Fl(V )n//LbSLr if and only if for every closed orbit SLr · x, the
stabilizer Stabx acts on Lx trivially. Lemma 3.5 below tells us that for any L ∈ Pic(Fl(V )n),
(cid:3)
Lr descends to Fl(V )n//LbSLr.
Lemma 3.5. Let x = (W i•) be a stable point on Fl(V )n with respect to some linearization. Then
Stabx is isomorphic to the group of r-th root of unity.
Proof. Let A ∈ Stabx. A has a finite order because Stabx is finite. Since char C = 0, the
Jordan canonical form of A cannot have any block of size larger than one. Thus we may
assume that A is a diagonal matrix. Decompose V = ⊕λVλ into eigenspaces with respect
to A. Note that any invariant space with respect to A has to be of the form ⊕λWλ where
Wλ ⊂ Vλ. Thus all W i
j are of these forms. If we take a diagonal matrix B which acts on
j , so B ∈ Stabx. But in
Vλ as a multiplication by aλ for some aλ, then B preserves all W i
this case dim Stabx is the number of distinct eigenvalues minus one. Since x has a finite
(cid:3)
stabilizer, there is only one eigenvalue. Therefore A is a scalar matrix.
Definition 3.6. A general linearization Lb is called a linearization with a maximal stable
locus if Fl(V )n \ (Fl(V )n)ss(Lb) is of codimension at least two, (so ρ(Fl(V )n//LbSLr) =
(r − 1)n).
Remark 3.7. For small n, Proposition 3.4 is not true. For instance, if r = 2, n = 4 or
r = n = 3, for a general linearization, Fl(V )n//SLr is a unirational normal curve. Thus
Fl(V )n//SLr
∼= P1.
4. WALL CROSSING ANALYSIS
Here we describe how the moduli space is changed if one varies the parabolic weight.
4.1. Walls and chambers. The space of all valid normalized parabolic weights is an open
polytope
r,n := {a = (ai
W o
j)1≤j≤r−1,1≤i≤n 1 > ai
1 > ai
2 > ··· > ai
r−1 > 0} ⊂ R(r−1)n.
Since the weight data is normalized, ai
r = 0. Let Wr,n be the closure of W o
r,n.
The polytopes W o
r,n and Wr,n have a natural wall-chamber structure: If two weights a
and a(cid:48) are on the same open chamber, then Mp(r, 0, a) = Mp(r, 0, a(cid:48)). If a is in one of open
chambers, then a is general thus Mp(r, 0, a) is smooth. Note that it is possible that a is not
effective, so Mp(r, 0, a) = ∅.
10
HAN-BOM MOON AND SANG-BUM YOO
A parabolic weight a is on a wall if there is a strictly semi-stable parabolic bundle E =
i•}, b).
(E,{W i•}, a). Then there is a unique destabilizing parabolic subbundle F = (F,{WF
For such an F,
µ(F) =
deg F +(cid:80)n
j ∩ Fpi)/(W i
j−1 ∩ Fpi))
= µ(E).
j dim((W i
i=1
=
It occurs when there are two integers d ≤ 0 and 1 ≤ s ≤ r − 1, n subsets J i ⊂ [r] of size s
such that
j=1 ai
(cid:80)r−1
d +(cid:80)n
a
r
Let J := {J 1, J 2,··· , J n}. Thus a stability wall is of the form
∆(s, d,J ) := {a ∈ W o
r,n r(d +
j) = sa}.
ai
rk F
(cid:80)
i=1
s
j∈J i ai
j
a
r
.
=
n(cid:88)
(cid:88)
This equation is linear with respect to the variables ai
finitely many hyperplanes and each open chamber is a connected component of
r,n is divided by
i=1
j∈J i
j. So the polytope W o
r,n \(cid:16)(cid:91)
W o
(cid:17)
∆(s, d,J )
.
For J = {J 1, J 2,··· , J n}, set J c := {[r] \ J 1, [r] \ J 2,··· , [r] \ J n}. Then ∆(s, d,J ) =
∆(r − s,−d,J c). ∆(s, d,{J, J,··· , J}) is denoted by ∆(s, d, nJ).
A wall-crossing is simple if it is a wall-crossing along the relative interior of a wall.
Because every wall-crossing can be decomposed into a finite sequence of simple wall-
crossings, it is enough to study simple wall-crossings.
Fix a wall ∆(s, d,J ) and take a general point a ∈ ∆(s, d,J ). A small open neighbor-
hood of a is divided into two pieces by the wall. Let ∆(s, d,J )+ and ∆(s, d,J )− be the
two connected components such that
and
r(d +
r(d +
n(cid:88)
n(cid:88)
i=1
i=1
(cid:88)
(cid:88)
j∈J i
j∈J i
j) > sa
ai
j) < sa
ai
respectively. Let a+ (resp. a−) be a point on ∆(s, d,J )+ (resp. ∆(s, d,J )−).
There are two functorial morphisms ([BH95, Theorem 3.1], [Tha96, Section 7])
Mp(r, 0, a−)
Mp(r, 0, a+)
φ−
φ+
Mp(r, 0, a).
Let Y ⊂ Mp(r, 0, a) be the locus that one of φ± : Y ± := φ±−1(Y ) → Y is not an isomor-
phism. That means Mp(r, 0, a−) \ Y − ∼= Mp(r, 0, a) \ Y ∼= Mp(r, 0, a+) \ Y +. We call Y ±
as the wall-crossing center. Suppose that E = (E,{W i•}, a) is on Y . Then there is a rank
'
'
w
w
FINITE GENERATION OF THE ALGEBRA OF CONFORMAL BLOCKS
11
s destabilizing subbundle E + = (E+,{WE+
i•}, b) with µ(E +) = µ(E). We have a short
exact sequence 0 → E + → E → E− → 0 in the category of parabolic sheaves where
E− = (E− := E/E+,{W/E+i•}, c). Then Y parametrizes S-equivalent classes of E + ⊕ E−.
Therefore Y ∼= Mp(s, d, b) × Mp(r − s,−d, c).
For the same data, define b± and c± by using a±. Let (E+, b±) be the universal fam-
ily on Mp(s, d, b±). Let (E−, c±) be the universal family on Mp(r − s,−d, c±). Let π+ :
Mp(s, d, b+)×Mp(r−s,−d, c+)×P1 → Mp(s, d, b+)×Mp(r−s,−d, c+) and π− : Mp(s, d, b−)×
Mp(r − s,−d, c−) × P1 → Mp(s, d, b−) × Mp(r − s,−d, c−) be projections. The exceptional
fibers of φ− and φ+ are projective bundles
Y − = PR1π−
∗ ParHom((E−, c−), (E+, b−))
i•}, b+), (E−,{W/E+i•}, c+)).
Y + = PR1π+∗ ParHom((E+, b+), (E−, c+))
and
respectively. Fiberwisely, φ− −1(E +⊕E−) = PExt1((E−,{W/E+i•}, c−), (E+,{WE+
and φ+−1(E + ⊕ E−) = PExt1((E+,{WE+
Remark 4.1. Furthermore, we can describe the change of the fibers in detail. An element
E ∈ Y − fits into a short exact sequence 0 → E + → E → E− → 0 in the category of parabolic
In particular, their underlying bundles fits into 0 → E+ → E → E− → 0.
bundles.
After the wall-crossing, φ+−1(φ−([E])) is the set of parabolic bundles F which fits into
the sequence 0 → E− → F → E + → 0. Again, its underlying bundle fits into the exact
sequence 0 → E− → F → E+ → 0.
Proposition 4.2 ([Tha96, Section 7]). Suppose that Mp(r, 0, a±) are nonempty. The blow-up
of Mp(r, 0, a−) along Y − is isomorphic to the blow-up of Mp(r, 0, a+) along Y +. In paticular,
dim Y − + dim Y + − dim Y = dim Mp(r, 0, a) − 1.
i•}, b−))
Note that for some weight data a+, the moduli space Mp(r, 0, a+) may be empty.
Proposition 4.3. Suppose that Mp(r, 0, a+) = ∅. Then Mp(r, 0, a−) has a projective bundle
structure over Mp(r, 0, a) = Mp(s, d, b−) × Mp(r − s,−d, c−).
Proof. Note that Mp(r, 0, a+) = ∅ only if Y − = Mp(r, 0, a−). Conversely, if Y − = Mp(r, 0, a−)
and Mp(r, 0, a+) (cid:54)= ∅, it is straightforward to make a contradiciton from Proposition 4.2
since dim Y + ≥ dim Y and dim Y − ≥ dim Mp(r, 0, a).
(cid:3)
j := cai
4.2. Scaling up. In this section, we examine a special kind of wall-crossing. Let a be a
general parabolic weight. For a positive real number c > 0, define a parabolic weight
j. When c = (cid:28) 1, a(c) satisfies the smallness condition in Theorem
a(c) as a(c)i
3.3, so Mp(r, 0, a()) = Fl(V )n//La()SLr. As c increases, we may cross several walls. By
perturbing if it is necessary, we may assume that all wall-crossings are simple. We will
call this type of wall-crossings as a scaling wall-crossing.
Suppose that ∆(s, d,J ) is a wall we can meet and a0 := a(c) ∈ ∆(s, d,J ). Let a± = a(c±
). For a parabolic bundle E = (E,{W i•}, a0) ∈ Y , let E + be the destabilizing subbundle
with respect to a0 and E− be the quotient E/E +. The induced weight data of E + with
respect to a± is denoted by b±, as before.
12
HAN-BOM MOON AND SANG-BUM YOO
Here we would like to compute dim Ext1(E−,E +) with respect to a−. By Serre duality
(Lemma 2.10), Ext1(E−,E +) ∼= SParHom(E + ⊗ O(−(n − 2)),E−)∗. Consider the following
short exact sequence of sheaves
0 → SParHom(E + ⊗ O(−(n − 2)),E−) → Hom(E+ ⊗ O(−(n − 2)), E−)
→
(cid:76)n
(cid:76)n
i=1 Hom(E+ ⊗ O(−(n − 2))pi, E−pi)
i=1 Npi(E + ⊗ O(−(n − 2)),E−)
→ 0
where Np(E1,E2) is the subspace of strictly parabolic maps in Hom(E1p, E2p) at p ∈ P1.
For a−, µ(E−) > µ(E +). Because (E−, b−) and (E +, c−) are stable,
H1(SParHom(E + ⊗ O(−(n − 2)),E−)) = Ext0(E−,E +)∗ = ParHom(E−,E +)∗ = 0
(4)
by Lemma 2.10. Thus we have an exact sequence of vector spaces
0 → SParHom(E + ⊗ O(−(n − 2)),E−) → Hom(E+ ⊗ O(−(n − 2)), E−)
→
(cid:76)n
(cid:76)n
i=1 Hom(E+ ⊗ O(−(n − 2))pi, E−pi)
i=1 Npi(E + ⊗ O(−(n − 2)),E−)
→ 0.
(5)
Recall that at each parabolic point pi, the intersection of E+ with Epi is described by an
s-subset J i ⊂ [r].
Lemma 4.4. Suppose that rk E+ = s. In the above situation,
dim Npi(E + ⊗ O(−(n − 2)),E−) = dim ωJ i
where ωJ i is the Schubert class in H∗(Gr(s, r)) associated to the increasing sequence J i.
Proof. Note that dim Npi(E + ⊗ O(−(n − 2)),E−) = dim Npi(E +,E−). At the fiber of pi, take
an ordered basis {ej} of Epi by choosing a nonzero vector ej for each W i
j−1. Then
E+pi (resp. E−pi) is spanned by {ej}j∈J i (resp. {ej}j∈[r]\J i). Now to construct a map in
Npi(E +,E−), ej ∈ E+pi can be mapped into the subspace of generated by ek where k < j
(cid:3)
and k /∈ J i. Therefore the dimension is(cid:80)s
j − j) and this is equal to dim ωJ i.
j \ W i
j=1(J i
Now from (5) and Lemma 4.4, we obtain the following result.
Proposition 4.5. Suppose that n is sufficiently large. Let E be a parabolic bundle on Y ⊂
Mp(r, 0, a) for a scaling wall ∆(s, d,J ). Let E + be the destabilizing subbundle and E− = E/E +.
With respect to the parabolic weight a−,
(6)
dim Ext1(E−,E +) = dim Hom(E+ ⊗ O(−(n − 2)), E−) − ns(r − s) +
dim ωJ i.
i=1
Let a be a general parabolic weight and consider the scaling wall-crossing. For the
weight data a(), Mp(r, 0, a()) is the GIT quotient Fl(V )n//La()SLr, and any underlying
vector bundle E of E ∈ Mp(r, 0, a()) is trivial.
The first wall we can meet while the scaling wall-crossing is of the form ∆(s,−1, n[s]).
Let ∆(s, d,J ) be the first wall. Because E does not have any positive degree subbundle,
d ≤ 0. A wall of the form ∆(s, 0,J ) does not appear while scaling. (These walls are GIT
walls.) The maximal parabolic slope we can obtain occurs when d is the smallest one
and J i = [s]. Indeed only two of them actually occur.
n(cid:88)
FINITE GENERATION OF THE ALGEBRA OF CONFORMAL BLOCKS
13
Lemma 4.6. The first wall is either ∆(1,−1, n[1]) or ∆(r − 1,−1, n[r − 1]). Moreover, only one
of them occurs during the scaling wall-crossing.
Proof. We show that the walls ∆(s,−1, n[s]) for 2 ≤ s ≤ r − 2 do not intersect W o
r,n.
Suppose that ∆(s,−1, n[s]) ∩ W o
r,n is nonempty and the wall actually provides a non-
trivial wall-crossing for 2 ≤ s ≤ r − 2. For notational simplicity, we may assume that
a = a(1) ∈ ∆(s,−1, n[s]). E = (E = Or,{W i•}, a−) ∈ Y − has a parabolic subbundle
F = (F ∼= O(−1) ⊕ Os−1,{WF
j for all i and 1 ≤ j ≤ s, and
µ(F) = µ(E) with respect to a. Then there is an (s + 1)-dimensional vector space V (cid:48) such
that F → E factors through F → V (cid:48) ⊗O → E. Let F(cid:48) be the induced parabolic subbundle
of E whose underlying bundle is V (cid:48) ⊗ O. With respect to a− = a(1 − ), E is stable. Thus
we have
i•}, b−) such that WF
i
j = W i
n(cid:88)
s(cid:88)
i=1
j=1
1
s + 1
j = µ(F(cid:48)) < µ(E) =
ai
a.
1
r
On the other hand, let F (cid:48)(cid:48) ⊂ F be any rank one trivial subbundle and let F(cid:48)(cid:48) be the para-
bolic subbundle induced by F (cid:48)(cid:48). Then we have
By taking the weighted average of left sides, we have
a >
j + (r − s − 1)
ai
(s + 1)
ai
s
1
n(cid:88)
s ≤ µ(F(cid:48)(cid:48)) < µ(E) =
ai
(cid:33)
n(cid:88)
(cid:32)
1
r
1
r
a.
1
r
n(cid:88)
(cid:32) s−1(cid:88)
j + (r − s)ai
ai
s
(cid:33)
>
a
1
r
=
1
r
j=1
i=1
i=1
j=1
s + 1
i=1
and this is a contradiction.
Now suppose that the first wall is ∆(1,−1, n[1]). We may assume that a ∈ ∆(1,−1, n[1]).
E = (E = Or,{W i•}, a−) ∈ Y − has a subbundle F whose underlying bundle F is O(−1)
such that Fpi = W i
1. We can take a 2-dimensional V (cid:48) and F(cid:48) as before. Then
n(cid:88)
s(cid:88)
i=1
n(cid:88)
i=1
1
2
1 ≤ µ(F(cid:48)) < µ(E) =
ai
a.
1
r
Now assume that E is also in the wall-crossing center for ∆(r − 1,−1, n[r − 1]). Then
there is a subbundle G ∼= O(−1) ⊕ Or−2 of E such that Gpi = W i
r−1. Let G be the induced
parabolic subbundle whose underlying bundle is G. Let V (cid:48) be the (r − 2)-dimensional
vector space such that G = O(−1) ⊕ (V (cid:48) ⊗ O) and let G(cid:48) be the parabolic subbundle
associated to V (cid:48) ⊗ O. Then
n(cid:88)
r−1(cid:88)
i=1
j=2
1
r − 2
j ≤ µ(G(cid:48)) < µ(E) =
ai
a.
1
r
An weighted average of the left hand sides of is µ(E). This makes a contradiction.
(cid:3)
for ∆(1,−1, n[1]) and
Remark 4.7. The proof tells us that two wall-crossing centers Y −
r−1 for ∆(r − 1,−1, n[r − 1]) cannot be simultaneously stable on Fl(V )n//LSLr for any
Y −
linearization L.
1
14
HAN-BOM MOON AND SANG-BUM YOO
The first wall-crossing, which is either along ∆(1,−1, n[1]) or ∆(r − 1,−1, n[r − 1]) de-
pending on a, is always a blow-up.
Lemma 4.8. The scaling wall-crossing along ∆(1,−1, n[1]) (resp. ∆(r − 1,−1, n[r − 1])) is a
blow-up along Y − ∼= Mp(r − 1, 1, c) (resp. Mp(r − 1,−1, b)).
Proof. By Proposition 4.2, the wall-crossing is a blow-up if and only if Y − = Y if and only
if dim Ext1(E−,E +) with respect to a− is one for E ∈ Y −.
Consider the first case of ∆(1,−1, n[1]). The underlying bundle E+ is O(−1) and E− =
O(1)⊕Or−2. Thus Hom(E+⊗O(−(n−2)), E−) ∼= H0(O(n)⊕O(n−1)r−2). Because J i = [1],
dim ωJ i = 0. By using Proposition 4.5, it is straightforward to see that dim Ext1(E−,E +) =
1. The blow-up center is obtained from the description in Section 4.1 and the fact that
(cid:3)
Mp(1, d, b) is a point. The other case is similar.
Now suppose that a is a general small weight such that Mp(r, 0, a) = Fl(V )n//LaSLr
and ρ(Fl(V )n//LaSLr) = (r − 1)n. By scaling up the weight, for some c > 1, the weight
data a(c) crosses either ∆(1,−1, n[1])-wall or ∆(r − 1,−1, n[r − 1])-wall. Then for a(c + ),
Mp(r, 0, a(c + )) has Picard number (r − 1)n + 1, which is maximal because the moduli
stack Mp(r, 0) has the same Picard number. In particular, Cox(Mp(r, 0)) is identified with
Cox(Mp(r, 0, a(c + ))).
Definition 4.9. A general parabolic weight a is dominant if ρ(Mp(r, 0, a)) = (r − 1)n + 1.
Such a weight is called dominant because any other Mp(r, 0, b) can be obtained as a
rational contraction of Mp(r, 0, a) (See Section 6).
The exceptional divisor Y + parametrizes the parabolic bundles with nontrivial under-
lying bundles (Remark 4.1). Thus Y + is the generalized theta divisor Θ described in
Section 2.2. As a conformal block, it is identified with V†
1,(cid:126)0.
The Cox ring of the moduli stack Mp(r, 0) can be identified with that of a projective
moduli space.
Proposition 4.10. Let a be a dominant weight. Then Cox(Mp(r, 0, a)) = Cox(Mp(r, 0)).
Proof. From the inclusion Mp(r, 0, a) (cid:44)→ Mp(r, 0), we have a morphism of Picard groups
Pic(Mp(r, 0)) → Pic(Mp(r, 0, a)) and that of Cox rings r : Cox(Mp(r, 0)) = V† → Cox(Mp(r, 0, a)).
We claim that r is an isomorphism.
We may assume that Mp(r, 0, a) is the blow-up of Fl(V )n//LSLr where L is a lineariza-
tion with a maximal stable locus. Let π : Mp(r, 0, a) → Fl(V )n//LSLr be the blow-up
morphism. The exceptional divisor is Θ.
Suppose that s ∈ V†
(cid:96),(cid:126)λ. For some (cid:96)(cid:48) (cid:29) 0 determined by (cid:126)λ, V†
(cid:96)(cid:48),(cid:126)λ
, the space of
classical invariant factors. Note that V SLr
is the space of global sections of the descent F (cid:126)λ
i=1Fλi. If (cid:96) ≥ (cid:96)(cid:48), so V†
on Fl(V )n//LSLr of F(cid:126)λ := ⊗n
, then s can be regarded
as a section of H0(Mp(r, 0, a), π∗F (cid:126)λ + ((cid:96) − (cid:96)(cid:48))Θ) ∼= H0(Mp(r, 0, a), π∗F (cid:126)λ). If (cid:96) < (cid:96)(cid:48), s can be
(cid:126)λ which vanishes along Θ with multiplicity (cid:96)(cid:48) − (cid:96). Thus it
regarded as an invariant in V SLr
is a section of H0(Mp(r, 0, a), π∗F λ − ((cid:96)(cid:48) − (cid:96))Θ).
∼= V†
(cid:96)(cid:48),(cid:126)λ
∼= V SLr
(cid:126)λ
(cid:126)λ
(cid:96),(cid:126)λ
= V SLr
(cid:126)λ
FINITE GENERATION OF THE ALGEBRA OF CONFORMAL BLOCKS
15
Since any line bundle on Mp(r, 0, a) with a nonzero global section can be written uniquely
(cid:3)
as π∗F λ − mΘ for some (cid:126)λ and m ∈ Z, we obtain the desired result.
5. THE MODULI SPACE IS A MORI DREAM SPACE
In this section, we prove Theorem 5.1. The finite generation of V† (Theorem 5.3) follows
immediately.
Theorem 5.1. For any rank r and a general parabolic weight a, Mp(r, 0, a) is of Fano type.
Recall that a Q-factorial normal varieity X is of Fano type if there is an effective Q-divisor
∆ such that −(KX + ∆) is ample and (X, ∆) is a klt pair.
By [BCHM10, Corollary 1.3.2], a Q-factorial normal variety of Fano type is a Mori dream
space.
Corollary 5.2. For any general parabolic weight a, Mp(r, 0, a) is a Mori dream space.
Theorem 5.3. The algebra V† of conformal blocks is finitely generated.
Proof. By Proposition 4.10, the Cox ring of the moduli stack Mp(r, 0) is the same with that
of Ma(r, 0, a) if a is dominant. If n > 2r, by Theorem 3.3 and Proposition 3.4, there is
a small weight b such that ρ(Mp(r, 0, b)) = (r − 1)n. During the scaling wall-crossing,
the first wall-crossing is a blow-up. Thus there is a dominant weight a = b(c). Then
Cox(Mp(r, 0)) = Cox(Mp(r, 0, a)) is finitely generated by Corollary 5.2 and [HK00, Theo-
rem 2.9].
When n is small, by Lemma 5.4, for a sufficiently large point configuration q ⊃ p, there
is a morphism Mq(r, 0, a(cid:48)) → Mp(r, 0, a) for some a(cid:48). Then Pic(Mp(r, 0, a)) is a subgroup
of Pic(Mq(r, 0, a(cid:48))). Let H := Hom(Pic(Mq(r, 0, a(cid:48)))/Pic(Mp(r, 0, a)), C∗). There is a natural
action of H on Cox(Mq(r, 0, a(cid:48))) and by propagation of vacua ([Uen08, Theorem 3.15]),
∼= Cox(Mq(r, 0, a(cid:48)))H.
Cox(Mp(r, 0, a)) ∼=
V†
(cid:96),(λ1,λ2,··· ,λn,0,0,··· ,0)
V†
(cid:96),(λ1,λ2,··· ,λn)
∼=
(cid:77)
(cid:77)
(cid:96),(cid:126)λ
(cid:96),(cid:126)λ
A torus-invariant subring of a finitely generated algebra is finitely generated, too ([Dol03,
(cid:3)
Theorem 3.3]).
Lemma 5.4. Let a be a general effective parabolic weight. Then for any finite point configuration
q ⊃ p, there is a parabolic weight a(cid:48) such that there is a morphism Mq(r, 0, a(cid:48)) → Mp(r, 0, a).
Proof. Suppose that p = (p1, p2,··· , pn) and q = (p1, p2,··· , pn+m). Let a(cid:48) be a parabolic
weight such that a(cid:48)i• = ai• for i ≤ n and a(cid:48)i
j are sufficiently small for i > n. There is a
natural 'forgetful' map
Mp(r, 0, a(cid:48)) → Mq(r, 0, a)
(E,{W i•}, a(cid:48))
(cid:55)→ (E,{W i•}i≤n, a).
This map is regular, because small weights (ai•)i>n do not affect on the inequalities for
(cid:3)
stability.
16
HAN-BOM MOON AND SANG-BUM YOO
Remark 5.5. The proof of Theorem 5.3 does not provide any explicit set of generators.
When r ≤ 3 and p is a generic configuration of points, by using a degeneration method,
Manon showed that the set of rn−1 level one conformal blocks generates V† ([Man09,
Theorem 1.5], [Man13, Theorem 3]). For r ≥ 4, the set of level one conformal blocks is
insufficient to generate V†. We expect that the generic configuration assumption is not
essential.
The remaining part of this section is devoted to the proof of Theorem 5.1. We start with
the computation of the canonical divisor. O(D) denotes the descent of a line bundle O(D)
on X to the GIT quotient X//G.
Lemma 5.6. Let L be a general linearization on Fl(V )n with a maximal stable locus. The canonical
divisor K of Fl(V )n//LSLr is
⊗n
i=1π∗
i O(−2,−2,··· ,−2).
j
i O(b1,··· , br−1).
∼= P1 ⊂ Fl(V )n be a Schubert curve that is obtained by taking a family of parabolic
k for k (cid:54)= j are fixed and general, but W i
j
j−1.Since L is a
j does not intersect the unstable locus whose
codimension is at least two. Thus by taking its image in Fl(V )n//LSLr, we have a curve
C i
Let (cid:101)C i
Proof. Because the canonical divisor is Sn-invariant, we have K = ⊗n
bundles (Or,{W i•}) such that W l• for l (cid:54)= i and W i
linearization with a maximal stable locus, (cid:101)C i
is varying as a one-dimensional family of subspaces in W i
Note that (cid:101)C i
j is indeed a curve on a fiber of the projection map p : Fl(V )n → Fl(V )n−1
i O(b1,··· , br−1) = bj.
j. By projection formula, C i
j+1 containing W i
j · ⊗n
i=1π∗
i=1π∗
which forgets the i-th factor. The tangent bundle of the i-th factor Fl(V ) is the quotient
0 → HomF·(V, V ) ⊗ O → Hom(V, V ) ⊗ O → TFl(V ) → 0
j
j
→ 0.
j
j is isomorphic to
= 2, and thus deg TFl(V )n(cid:101)Ci
= 2. By the SLr-action, (cid:101)C i
0 → O(r2+r−4)/2 ⊕ O(−1)2 → Or2 → TFl(V )(cid:101)Ci
where HomF·(V, V ) is the space of endomorphisms which preserve the flag. The restric-
tion of the sequence to (cid:101)C i
So deg TFl(V )(cid:101)Ci
j deforms without
fixed points. Thus along the fiber of the quotient map, the restriction of the tangent bundle
is trivial. Therefore deg TFl(V )n//LSLrCi
(cid:3)
= 2. So bj = C i
Corollary 5.7. For a general small weight a, H0(−K) = V†
j=1 ωj).
i O(2, 2,··· , 2). This is a product of (r−1)n line bundles
Proof. By Lemma 5.6, −K = ⊗n
i O(ea) ⊗
of the form π∗
jO(er−a)) is identified with V†
π∗
1,(0,··· ,0,ωr−a,0,··· ,0,ωa,0,··· ) where ωr−a is on the i-factor and ωa is
on the j-th factor ([BGM15, Proposition 1.3]). Now by taking the tensor product of them,
(cid:3)
we obtain the statement.
Proposition 5.8. Let a be a dominant parabolic weight. Let M = Mp(r, 0, a). Then H0(−KM) =
V†
(r−1)n,(λ,λ,··· ,λ) where λ = 2((cid:80)r−1
jO(er−a) where ek is the standard k-th vector. Each H0(π∗
2r,(λ,λ,··· ,λ) where λ = (2(cid:80)r−1
i O(ea) ⊗ π∗
j · K = −2.
j=1 ωj).
i=1π∗
j
FINITE GENERATION OF THE ALGEBRA OF CONFORMAL BLOCKS
17
Proof. We may assume that a is the weight data right after the first wall-crossing while
the scaling wall-crossing from a(). By Lemma 4.8, the first wall-crossing is the blow-
up along Mp(r − 1, 1, c) or Mp(r − 1,−1, b). In particular, the codimension of the blow-
up center is (r − 1)n − 2r + 1. By the blow-up formula of canonical divisors, if K de-
notes the canonical divisor of Fl(V )n//LaSLr and if π : M → Fl(V )n//LaSLr is the blow-
up morphism, −KM = π∗(−K) − ((r − 1)n − 2r)Y +. Since Y + is the theta divisor Θ,
H0(−KM) = V†
(cid:3)
(r−1)n−((r−1)n−2r),(λ,λ,··· ,λ) = V†
2r,(λ,λ,··· ,λ).
A key theorem is the following classical result of Pauly.
Theorem 5.9 ([Pau96, Theorem 3.3, Corollary 6.7]). Let a = (ai•) be a parabolic weight. Then
there is an ample line bundle Θa on Mp(r, 0, a) such that H0(Θa) is canonically identified with
V†
(cid:96),(λ1,λ2,··· ,λn) where (cid:96) is the smallest positive integer such that (cid:96)ai
j ∈ Z and λi
j.
j = (cid:96)ai
i•) = 1
Let ac be a parabolic weight such that (ac
r (r − 1, r − 2,··· , 1). By Theorem 5.9,
−KM ∈ V†
2r,(λ,λ,··· ,λ) is an ample divisor on Mp(r, 0, ac). Thus Mp(r, 0, ac) is a Fano variety.
However, in many cases (even for rank two), ac lies on a wall, so it is not general and not
dominant. To avoid this technical difficulty, we perturb the weight data slightly. Let ad be
a general small perturbation of ac such that the set of walls that we meet while the scaling
wall crossing from ac() to ac is equal to that for the scaling wall crossing from ad() to ad.
Since Mp(r, 0, ad()) ∼= Fl(V )n//Lad()SLr and Lad() is sufficiently close to the symmetric
linearization, by Proposition 3.4, ρ(Mp(r, 0, ad()) = (r − 1)n if n > 2r.
We show that if n is sufficiently large, then ad is dominant.
Proposition 5.10. Let ∆(s, d,J ) be a wall one meets while the scaling wall-crossing from ad() to
ad. Suppose that n is sufficiently large. Then the wall-crossing is not a blow-down. In particular,
ad is dominant.
Proof. Let a = ad(c) be the weight on the wall, and a± are weights near the wall as be-
fore. Recall that the wall-crossing center Y − is isomorphic to PExt1(E−,E +)-bundle over
Mp(s, d, b) × Mp(r − s,−d, c).
Suppose that a general point on Y − parametrizes a parabolic bundle with a non-trivial
underlying bundle. Then Y − ⊂ Θ.
If the wall-crossing is blow-down, then Y − = Θ
because Θ is an irreducible divisor. But Θ is not contracted by scaling-up by Lemma 6.2.
Thus we may assume that a general point of Y − parametrizes a parabolic bundle with a
trivial underlying bundle.
Let E = (E,{W i•}, a−) be a general point on Y − and E + = (E+,{WE
i•}, b−) (resp. E− =
(E−,{W/Ei•}, c−)) be the destabilizing subbundle (resp. quotient bundle). Since E is
trivial, E+ (resp. E−) is a direct sum of line bundles with nonpositive (resp. nonnegative)
degrees. Thus dim Hom(E+ ⊗ O(−(n − 2)), E−) = −dr + (n − 1)s(r − s). By Proposition
4.5, with respect to a−,
dim Ext1(E−,E +) = −dr − s(r − s) +
dim ωJ i.
n(cid:88)
i=1
18
HAN-BOM MOON AND SANG-BUM YOO
If the wall-crossing is a blow-down,
dim Ext1(E−,E +) + dim Mp(s, d, b) + dim Mp(r − s,−d, c) = dim Mp(r, 0, a).
Since dim Mp(r, d, a) = nr(r − 1)/2 − r2 + 1, this is equivalent to
dim ωJ i = (n − 1)s(r − s) + dr − 1.
n(cid:88)
i=1
Now we show that such a wall does not appear when n (cid:29) 0. If ∆(s, d,J ) is a wall that
we cross while scaling, then there is a constant 0 < c ≤ 1 such that
d + cn
s − s(s + 1)
((n − 1)s(r − s) + dr − 1))
n(cid:88)
i=1
r (r − 1, r − 2,··· , 1). Thus
(cid:16)
s(cid:88)
(cid:33)
k − k)
(J i
k − c
r
c − c
r
(cid:17)(cid:33)
k=1
dim ωJ i
(cid:19)
(cid:19)
.
(1 + s(r − s)) + (1 − c)d
cn(r − 1)
2r
.
=
for the weight a = ac(c) on ∆(s, d,J ).
Note that the weight data ac(c) is defined as ac(c)i• = c
d +
(cid:32)
(cid:18)
(cid:18)
(cid:18)
cn
µ(E +) =
=
=
=
1
s
1
s
1
s
1
s
c
r
(cid:88)
n(cid:88)
(cid:18)
(cid:18)
i=1
j∈J i
s − s(s + 1)
d + cn
2r
s − s(s + 1)
2r
µ(E +) = µ(E)
d +
(cid:32)
n(cid:88)
(cid:19)
i=1
(r − j)
2r
1
s
=
(cid:19)
− c
(cid:19)
r
− c
r
− s(r − s)
(cid:32) n(cid:88)
r−1(cid:88)
r
(r − j)
c
r
i=1
j=1
On the other hand,
µ(E) =
From µ(E +) = µ(E), we have
1
r
+
c
r
(cid:33)
(cid:19)
(cid:19)
(cid:18)
(cid:18)
csn(r − 1)
2r
= cn
s − s(s + 1)
2r
− s(r − s)
r
+
(1 + s(r − s)) + (1 − c)d,
c
r
which is equivalent to
c
ns
+
s − r
2r
1 + s(r − s)
r
= −(1 − c)d.
If n (cid:29) 0, then the left hand side is a negative number, but the right hand side is non-
negative because d < 0. Thus there is no such 0 < c ≤ 1.
(cid:3)
We are ready to prove the main theorem.
Proof of Theorem 5.1. First of all, suppose that n is sufficiently large. By Proposition 5.10,
M := Mp(r, 0, ad) has Picard number (r − 1)n + 1. Then, −KM is nef because it is a limit of
ample divisors. If the anticanonical divisor is not big, then the wall-crossing center is the
whole M, and dim Ext1(E−,E +) = dim M − dim Mp(s, d, b) − dim Mp(r − s,−d, c) + 1, or
i=1 dim ωJ i = (n− 1)s(r − s) + dr. By a similar computation as in the proof
equivalently,(cid:80)n
FINITE GENERATION OF THE ALGEBRA OF CONFORMAL BLOCKS
19
of Proposition 5.10, one can check that such a boundary wall-crossing does not occur as
long as n is large. Thus the anticanonical divisor is also big and M is a smooth (Proposition
2.11) weak Fano variety. Thus M is of Fano type.
For a general non-necessarily dominant weight a, because ad is dominant, Mp(r, 0, a) is
obtained from Mp(r, 0, ad) by taking several flips and blow-downs, but no blow-ups. By
[GOST15, Theorem 1.1, Corollary 1.3], Mp(r, 0, a) is also of Fano type. When n is small, by
Lemma 5.4, Mp(r, 0, a) is an image of Mq(r, 0, a(cid:48)) for some large q. Thus it is of Fano type
(cid:3)
by [GOST15, Corollary 1.3].
6. MORI'S PROGRAM OF THE MODULI SPACE
We are ready to run Mori's program of Mp(r, 0, a). In this section, n > 2r and a is a
dominant weight.
6.1. Birational models. Recall that for an integral divisor D on a projective variety X,
X(D) := Proj
H0(X,O(mD))
(cid:77)
m≥0
be the associated projective model. The following observation is an immediate conse-
quence of Pauly's theorem (Theorem 5.9).
Proposition 6.1. Let D ∈ intEff(Mp(r, 0, a)). Then Mp(r, 0, a)(D) ∼= Mp(r, 0, b) for some
parabolic weight b.
In particular, all birational models of Mp(r, 0, a) obtained from Mori's program are again
moduli spaces of parabolic bundles with some weight data.
Proof. For a notational simplicity, set M = Mp(r, 0, a). We may assume the M is the blow-
up of Fl(V )n//LSLr along Mp(r − 1,−1, b) or Mp(r − 1, 1, c). Let π : M → Fl(V )n//LSLr be
the blow-up morphism, and Y + = Θ be the exceptional divisor. With respect to such
an L, by Proposition 3.4, Pic(Fl(V )n//LSLr) is identified with an index r sublattice of
Pic(Fl(V )n). Thus any line bundle on Fl(V )n//LSLr can be uniquely written as ⊗n
i F λi
where F λi is the descent of Fλi on Fl(V ) and πi : Fl(V )n → Fl(V ) is the i-th projection.
Similarly, any line bundle O(D) on M can be uniquely written as π∗ ⊗n
i F λi − kΘ for
some k ∈ Z.
i=1 π∗
i=1π∗
When k = 0,
M(D) = (Fl(V )n//LSLr)(⊗n
i F λi) = Proj
H0(Fl(V )n//LSLr,⊗n
i=1π∗
i F
m
λi)
i=1π∗
H0(Fl(V )n,⊗n
i=1π∗
(cid:77)
m≥0
= Proj
i F m
λi )SLr = Fl(V )n//⊗n
i=1π∗
i Fλi SLr,
(cid:77)
m≥0
which is Mp(r, 0, b) for some b by Theorem 3.3.
If k < 0, then M(D) = M(π∗ ⊗n
i F λi − kΘ) = M(π∗ ⊗n
tional divisor of the rational contraction M (cid:57)(cid:57)(cid:75) M(π∗ ⊗n
i=1 π∗
i=1 π∗
i=1 π∗
i F λi) because Θ is an excep-
i Fλi SLr.
i F λi)) = Fl(V )n//⊗n
i=1π∗
20
HAN-BOM MOON AND SANG-BUM YOO
Suppose that k > 0.
i=1 π∗
H0(M, π∗ ⊗n
i F λi) = H0(Fl(V )n//LSLr,⊗n
i=1π∗
i F λi) = H0(Fl(V )n,⊗n
i=1Fλi)SLr
= V†
N,(λ1,λ2,··· ,λn)
for some N > 0. Thus H0(M, D) = V†
5.9 implies that V†
N−k,(λ1,λ2,··· ,λn) is an ample linear system on Mp(r, 0, b) for some b.
Suppose that N − k = λi
1 for some i. Then for any m,
N−k,(λ1,λ2,··· ,λn). If N − k > λi
1 for all i, then Theorem
H0(mD − Θ) = V†
m(N−k)−1,(mλ1,mλ2,··· ,mλn) = 0
because m(N − k) − 1 < mλi
1. Thus D is on the boundary of the effective cone.
(cid:3)
We close this section with a lemma which was used in the proof of Proposition 5.10.
Lemma 6.2. During a scaling wall-crossing, Θ is not contracted.
Proof. Let a be a dominant weight. We may assume that M := Mp(r, 0, a) is the blow-
up of Fl(V )n//LSLr. By Proposition 6.1, the scaling wall-crossing is the computation of
M(D − cΘ) where D = π∗ ⊗n
i F λi, from c = 0 to c (cid:29) 0.
Suppose that for some c > 0, M(D − cΘ) is a contraction of Θ. Then M(D − cΘ + dΘ) =
M(D − cΘ) for any d > 0. In particular, M(D − Θ) is a contraction of Θ for 0 < (cid:28) 1. But
D − Θ is an ample divisor on M and we have a contradiction.
(cid:3)
i=1 π∗
6.2. Effective cone. The first step of Mori's program is the computation of the effective
cone.
For some weight data b, Mp(r, 0, b) may be empty. By combining this observation with
Proposition 6.1, we can compute an H-representation of Eff(Mp(r, 0, a)). This result was
obtained by Belkale in [Bel08] in a greater generality and with a different idea.
Set M := Mp(r, 0, a). Since M is a Mori dream space, Eff(M) is a closed polyhedral cone.
(cid:96),(λ1,λ2,··· ,λn). There are two classes of linear
For each D ∈ Eff(M), H0(D) is identified with V†
inequalities for the non-vanishing of conformal blocks:
j+1 (it includes λi
r−1 ≥ 0 by our normalization assumption);
(1) λi
(2) λi
j ≥ λi
1 ≤ (cid:96).
The first class of inequalities comes from the effectiveness of ⊗n
i=1Fλi on Fl(V )n. For the
second class, see [BGM15, Section 4] for an explanation. Here we construct extra linear
inequalities.
Recall that the (genus zero) Gromov-Witten invariant counts the number of rational curves
intersecting several subvarieties. Here we employ the definition in [Ber97], which is
slightly different from the standard definition using moduli spaces of stable maps ([FP97]).
For a partition λ = (r ≥ λ1 ≥ λ2 ≥ ··· ≥ λs ≥ 0) and a complete flag W• of an r-dimension
vector space V , we obtain a Schubert subvariety Ωλ(W•) ⊂ Gr(s, V ) = Gr(s, r). Its numer-
ical class is independent of the choice of W•, and is denoted by ωλ ∈ H∗(Gr(s, r)). For a
FINITE GENERATION OF THE ALGEBRA OF CONFORMAL BLOCKS
21
collection of general complete flags W i• of V and a nonnegative integer d, the Gromov-
Witten invariant
(cid:104)ωλ1, ωλ2,··· , ωλn(cid:105)d
is the number of maps f : (P1, p = (pi)) → Gr(s, r) of degree d such that f (pi) ∈ Ωλi(W i•)
if the number is finite, and otherwise it is zero. Since the moduli space of maps from
P1 to Gr(s, r) is not proper, a rigorous definition requires a compactified space of maps,
for instance the quot scheme over P1, but by Moving Lemma ([Ber97, Lemma 2.2A]), the
number is equal to the number of genuine maps from P1 to Gr(s, r).
Proposition 6.3. For each collection of partitions λ1, λ2,··· , λn of length s and a nonpositive
integer d such that the Gromov-Witten invariant (cid:104)ωλ1, ωλ2,··· , ωλn(cid:105)−d on Gr(s, r) is one, there
is a linear inequality
(7)
1
s
d(cid:96) +
n(cid:88)
(cid:88)
i=1
j∈J i
≤ 1
r
λi
j
(cid:32) n(cid:88)
r−1(cid:88)
i=1
j=1
(cid:33)
λi
j
.
which defines Eff(M). Moreover, these inequalities and two classes (1) and (2) of inequalities
provide the H-represenation of Eff(M).
Proof. Let D be a general point on a facet of Eff(M), which is not one of facets described
above. Take an embedding of a small line segment γ : [−, ] → N1(M) such that γ(0) = D
and γ(x) ∈ int Eff(M) when x < 0. Let D± := γ(±).
Note that each x ∈ [−, ] defines an R-divisor Dx = L(cid:96)⊗⊗n
i=1Fλi, and hence a parabolic
weight ax by setting (ax)i = 1
j). We may assume that all ax are general except a0.
Because the moduli space becomes empty after changing the weight from a− to a, there
is a boundary wall ∆(s, d,J ) at a0. A wall-crossing is a boundary one if and only if
a general point E = (Or,{W i•}, a−) of Mp(r, 0, a−) has the unique detabilizing bundle
E + = (E+,{WE+
i•}, b−) of rank s such that µ(E +) = µ(E) with respect to a0. This implies
that there is a short exact sequence
(cid:96) (λi
0 → E+ → E → E− → 0
of bundles such that E+pi ∈ Ωλi(W i•). Therefore there is a map f : (P1, p) → Gr(s, r) of
degree −d such that f (pi) ∈ Ωλi(W i•). Therefore
(cid:104)ωλ1, ωλ2,··· , ωλn(cid:105)−d = 1.
In particular, to have a nonempty moduli space, µ(E +) ≤ µ(E), which is (7).
Now suppose that D is a divisor satisfies all of the given strict linear inequalities of
the form (7) for every collection of partitions λ1, λ2,··· , λn with (cid:104)ωλ1, ωλ2,··· , ωλn(cid:105)−d = 1.
Let a be the associated parabolic weight data. Then for a general parabolic bundle E =
(Or,{W i•}, a), there is no possible destabilizing bundle. Therefore E ∈ Mp(r, 0, a) and the
moduli space is nonempty. Because D is an ample divisor on Mp(r, 0, a), mD (cid:54)= ∅ for
some m > 0. Therefore D ∈ intEff(M). By taking the closure, we can obtain the effective
(cid:3)
cone.
22
HAN-BOM MOON AND SANG-BUM YOO
Remark 6.4. The computation of the V-representation from the H-representation is highly
nontrivial. In [Bel17], Belkale explains how to compute the extremal rays of the effective
cone for the quotient stack [Fl(V )3/SLr]. He informed to the authors that this computation
can be generalized to the case of arbitrary n and for Mp(r, 0, a), too.
6.3. Projective models and wall-crossing. The remaining steps of Mori's program are
the computation of projective models M(D) for M := Mp(r, 0, a) and the study of the
rational contraction M (cid:57)(cid:57)(cid:75) M(D). For D ∈ intEff(M), Proposition 6.1 already provides
the answer. It remains to find projective models associated to D ∈ ∂Eff(M). We content
ourselves with a description for facets of ∂Eff(M).
The first type of facets are that associated to Gromov-Witten invariants, as described
in Section 6.2. We call this type of facets as GW facets. In this case, the boundary wall-
crossing in Proposition 4.3 gives the contraction.
Proposition 6.5. Suppose that D is a general point on a GW facet of Eff(M). Then M(D) =
Mp(s,−d, b) × Mp(r − s, d, c) for some 0 < s < r, d ≥ 0, and b and c.
The second type of facets are of the form λk
j+1. This case is related to moduli
In
spaces of parabolic bundles with degenerated flags, which forgets j-th flag on pk.
[Pau96], Pauly proved Theorem 5.9 for such degenerated flags, too. The proof of the next
proposition is essentially same to that of Proposition 6.1.
j = λk
Proposition 6.6. Suppose that D is a general point of the facet of Eff(M) which is given by
j+1. Then M(D) = Mp(r, 0, b), which is the moduli space of parabolic bundles where its
λk
j = λk
k-th flag is a partial flag of type (1, 2,··· , j,··· , r − 1).
The last type of facets are of the type λk
1 = (cid:96).
Proposition 6.7. Suppose that D is a general point on the facet λk
Mp(r,−1, b) where b is a parabolic weight such that bi = 1
bk = 1
r−1,··· , λk
r−1) (the last flag is of type (2, 3,··· , r − 1)).
1 = (cid:96). Then M(D) =
r−1) for i (cid:54)= k and
2,··· , λi
r−2 − λk
1 − λk
(cid:96) (λi
1, λi
(cid:96) (λk
r−1, λk
2 − λk
Proof. By symmetry, we may assume that k = n. Let D(cid:48) be a big divisor which is suffi-
ciently close to D. Then M(D) = M(D(cid:48))(D). Thus we may replace M by M(D(cid:48)). Equiva-
lently, after Theorem 5.9, we may assume that a is sufficiently close to ( 1
j . Over pn, let W (cid:48)n
Let E = (E,{W i•}, a) ∈ Mp(r, 0, a). Consider the quotient map E → Epn/W n
r−1 → 0
and let E(cid:48) be the kernel. Then E(cid:48) is a vector bundle of degree −1. For pi with i < n, let
j ) where r : E(cid:48)pn → Epn is the restriction of E(cid:48) (cid:44)→ E.
W (cid:48)i
j = j+1. Thus we have a quasi parabolic bundle E(cid:48) := (E(cid:48),{W (cid:48)i•}) whose
Note that dim W (cid:48)n
last flag over pn is of type (2, 3,··· , r − 1).
We claim that E(cid:48) is semistable with respect to b. Let F(cid:48) = (F (cid:48),{V (cid:48)i•}, c) be a parabolic
subbundle of E(cid:48). To avoid a confusion, the slope with respect to b is denoted by µb.
j = r−1(W n
j = W i
(cid:96) λi).
FINITE GENERATION OF THE ALGEBRA OF CONFORMAL BLOCKS
= µ(E) − 1
r
− 1
r
r−1(cid:88)
j=1
an
j +
1
r
23
(cid:32)
bn
1 +
(cid:33)
r−2(cid:88)
j=1
bn
j
Because bn
j = an
µb(E(cid:48)) =
1
r
(cid:32)
j − an
−1 +
r−1,
(cid:88)
= µ(E) − 1
r
i<n
1
r
+
(cid:33)
r−1(cid:88)
j=1
ai
j + bn
1 +
r−2(cid:88)
j=1
bn
j
1 − an
an
r−1.
Suppose that F (cid:48) is a rank s subbundle of E. Then ker r ∩ F (cid:48)pn = 0. If J i denotes the
subset of indices j ∈ [r] such that W (cid:48)i
j−1 ∩ F (cid:48)pi,
deg F (cid:48) +
deg F (cid:48) +
(cid:88)
(cid:88)
i<n
j ∩ F (cid:48)pi (cid:54)= W (cid:48)i
(cid:88)
(cid:88)
+
(cid:88)
(cid:32)(cid:88)
ai
j +
j∈J n
j∈J i
bn
j
ai
j
1
s
j∈J n
i
j∈J i
(8)
µb(F(cid:48)) =
=
1
s
1
s
(cid:33)
j − an
(bn
j )
= µ(F(cid:48)) − an
r−1.
Therefore µb(E(cid:48)) − µb(F(cid:48)) = µ(E) − µ(F(cid:48)) − 1
µb(E(cid:48)) − µb(F(cid:48)) ≥ 0.
r + 1
r an
1. Since an
1 is sufficiently close to one,
If F (cid:48) is not a subbundle of E, then there is a subbundle F of E which contains F (cid:48) and
F/F (cid:48) is a torsion sheaf. Since E/E(cid:48) is of length one, F/F (cid:48) is also of length one. Therefore
deg F (cid:48) = deg F − 1. Let F be the parabolic subbundle of E whose underlying bundle is F .
By a similar computation with (8), we have
µb(F(cid:48)) = µ(F) − 1
s
1 − an
(an
and it is straightforward to see that µb(E(cid:48)) − µb(F(cid:48)) > 0.
Therefore the map M → Mp(r,−1, b) which sends E to E(cid:48) is a well-defined morphism.
This is a P1-fibration and it is of relative Picard number one. Thus it is associated to a
facet of Eff(M) which intersects the closure of the chamber for M. If M(D) (cid:54)= Mp(r,−1, b),
then Mp(r,−1, b) is associated to another facet. Because we already know the projective
1 = (cid:96) for some i (cid:54)= n. But
models for the other facets, the only remaining possibility is λi
because of the existence of a wall of the type ∆(s, 0,J ) where 1 ∈ J n but 1 /∈ J i, only one
of these facets is a facet of the closure of the chamber of M. Thus M(D) = Mp(r,−1, b). (cid:3)
r−1) − an
r−1
1
s
+
Because all of the birational models and projective models can be described in terms of
moduli spaces of parabolic bundles, the wall-crossings in Section 4.1 are building blocks
of the rational contraction M (cid:57)(cid:57)(cid:75) M(D). This is in some sense very satisfactory, because
all of them are smooth blow-ups/downs and projective bundle morphisms.
6.4. Rationality. It is an old open problem determining whether the moduli space of
(parabolic) bundles with a fixed determinant over a Riemann surface is rational or not
([KS99, Hof07]). The wall-crossing toward a boundary wall was applied to show the fact
that Mp(r, 0, a) is rational in [BH95]. Here we leave a sketch, for a reader's convenience.
24
HAN-BOM MOON AND SANG-BUM YOO
It is sufficient to prove for the case that a is sufficiently small, so Mp(r, 0, a) = Fl(V )n//LSLr
for some L. Cross several walls of type ∆(s, 0,J ), which are indeed GIT walls. If a is suf-
ficiently close to the boundary, then by Proposition 4.3, Mp(r, 0, a) is a projective bundle
over Mp(s, 0, b) × Mp(r − s, 0, c). Thus the problem is reduced to a lower rank case. If
r = 1, the moduli space is a point, so it is trivial.
Proposition 6.8 ([BH95, Proposition 5.1]). The moduli space Mp(r, 0, a) is rational.
REFERENCES
[BCHM10] Caucher Birkar, Paolo Cascini, Christopher D. Hacon, and James McKernan. Existence of mini-
[Bel08]
[Bel17]
[Ber97]
[BGM15]
[BGM16]
[BH95]
[CM17]
[DN89]
[Dol03]
[FP97]
mal models for varieties of log general type. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 23(2):405–468, 2010. 15
Prakash Belkale. Quantum generalization of the Horn conjecture. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 21(2):365–
408, 2008. 1, 3, 20
Prakash Belkale. Extremal rays in the hermitian eigenvalue problem. arXiv:1705.10580, 2017. 21
Aaron Bertram. Quantum Schubert calculus. Adv. Math., 128(2):289–305, 1997. 20, 21
Prakash Belkale, Angela Gibney, and Swarnava Mukhopadhyay. Vanishing and identities of
conformal blocks divisors. Algebr. Geom., 2(1):62–90, 2015. 5, 6, 16, 20
P. Belkale, A. Gibney, and S. Mukhopadhyay. Nonvanishing of conformal blocks divisors on
M 0,n. Transform. Groups, 21(2):329–353, 2016. 1
Hans U. Boden and Yi Hu. Variations of moduli of parabolic bundles. Math. Ann., 301(3):539–
559, 1995. 10, 23
Kiryong Chung and Han-Bom Moon. Mori's program for the moduli space of conics in grass-
mannian. Taiwanese. J. Math., 21(3):621–652, 2017. 2
J.-M. Drezet and M. S. Narasimhan. Groupe de Picard des vari´et´es de modules de fibr´es semi-
stables sur les courbes alg´ebriques. Invent. Math., 97(1):53–94, 1989. 9
Igor Dolgachev. Lectures on invariant theory, volume 296 of London Mathematical Society Lecture
Note Series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003. 7, 9, 15
W. Fulton and R. Pandharipande. Notes on stable maps and quantum cohomology. In Algebraic
geometry-Santa Cruz 1995, volume 62 of Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., pages 45–96. Amer. Math.
Soc., Providence, RI, 1997. 20
[HK00]
[Hof07]
[KS99]
[LS97]
[GOST15] Yoshinori Gongyo, Shinnosuke Okawa, Akiyoshi Sannai, and Shunsuke Takagi. Characteriza-
tion of varieties of Fano type via singularities of Cox rings. J. Algebraic Geom., 24(1):159–182,
2015. 19
Yi Hu and Sean Keel. Mori dream spaces and GIT. Michigan Math. J., 48:331–348, 2000. Dedi-
cated to William Fulton on the occasion of his 60th birthday. 2, 15
Norbert Hoffmann. Rationality and Poincar´e families for vector bundles with extra structure
on a curve. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (3):Art. ID rnm010, 30, 2007. 23
Alastair King and Aidan Schofield. Rationality of moduli of vector bundles on curves. Indag.
Math. (N.S.), 10(4):519–535, 1999. 23
Yves Laszlo and Christoph Sorger. The line bundles on the moduli of parabolic G-bundles over
curves and their sections. Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. (4), 30(4):499–525, 1997. 1, 5
Christopher A. Manon. The algebra of conformal blocks. arXiv:0910.0577, to appear in JEMS,
2009. 2, 3, 16
Christopher Manon. The algebra of SL3(C) conformal blocks. Transform. Groups, 18(4):1165–
1187, 2013. 2, 3, 16
Christopher Manon. Cox rings of moduli of quasi-parabolic principal bundles and the K-Pieri
rule. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A, 139:1–29, 2016. 2, 3
V. B. Mehta and C. S. Seshadri. Moduli of vector bundles on curves with parabolic structures.
Math. Ann., 248(3):205–239, 1980. 4, 5
[Man09]
[Man13]
[Man16]
[MS80]
FINITE GENERATION OF THE ALGEBRA OF CONFORMAL BLOCKS
25
[MY16]
[Pau96]
[Tha96]
[TK88]
Han-Bom Moon and Sang-Bum Yoo. Birational Geometry of the Moduli Space of Rank 2 Para-
bolic Vector Bundles on a Rational Curve. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (3):827–859, 2016. 2
Christian Pauly. Espaces de modules de fibr´es paraboliques et blocs conformes. Duke Math. J.,
84(1):217–235, 1996. 1, 5, 17, 22
Michael Thaddeus. Geometric invariant theory and flips. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 9(3):691–723, 1996.
3, 10, 11
Akihiro Tsuchiya and Yukihiro Kanie. Vertex operators in conformal field theory on P1 and
monodromy representations of braid group. In Conformal field theory and solvable lattice models
(Kyoto, 1986), volume 16 of Adv. Stud. Pure Math., pages 297–372. Academic Press, Boston, MA,
1988. 1
[TUY89] Akihiro Tsuchiya, Kenji Ueno, and Yasuhiko Yamada. Conformal field theory on universal fam-
ily of stable curves with gauge symmetries. In Integrable systems in quantum field theory and sta-
tistical mechanics, volume 19 of Adv. Stud. Pure Math., pages 459–566. Academic Press, Boston,
MA, 1989. 1
Kenji Ueno. Conformal field theory with gauge symmetry, volume 24 of Fields Institute Monographs.
American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008. 1, 15
Koji Yokogawa. Infinitesimal deformation of parabolic Higgs sheaves. Internat. J. Math.,
6(1):125–148, 1995. 6
[Uen08]
[Yok95]
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS, INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY, PRINCETON, NJ 08540
E-mail address: [email protected]
DIVISION OF GENERAL STUDIES, UNIST, ULSAN 44919, REPUBLIC OF KOREA
E-mail address: [email protected]
|
1510.07552 | 1 | 1510 | 2015-10-26T17:06:07 | On the moduli space of Higgs pairs with nilpotent residues | [
"math.AG",
"math-ph",
"math-ph"
] | We specify the conjecture about the structure of the Coulomb branch of N=2 supersymmetric quantum field theories in four dimensions. | math.AG | math |
ON THE MODULI SPACE OF HIGGS PAIRS WITH NILPOTENT
RESIDUES.
DENIS DEGTYAREV
Abstract. We specify the conjecture about the structure of the Coulomb branch of
N=2 supersymmetric quantum field theories in four dimensions
Contents
1.
Introduction
2. Preliminaries
2.1. Generalities on moduli space of Higgs bundles.
2.2. Poisson structure via levels.
3.
3.1. Marsden-Weinstein reduction
3.2. Covers of symplectic leaves.
4. Coulomb branch
References
Integrable systems on symplectic leaves and their covers.
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
5
5
1. Introduction
Let us given a N=2 supersymmetric quantum field theory (4d N=2 SUSSY QFT) Q.
Physical arguments imply that we can associate to Q an algebraic integrable system
DW (Q) which is in fact a generalized Hitchin system [4]. More precisely, let Σ be a
smooth algebraic curve.
In this paper we study the moduli space of meromorphic G-
Higgs pairs on Σ. The moduli space of such bundles has a canonical Poisson structure.
Symplectic leaves of the Poisson structure are the main objects of our interest.
We start by recalling basic constructions of the moduli space of Higgs bundles and
Poisson structure in section 2, following [7]. A point in a symplectic leaf of the Poisson
structure is an isomorphism class of pair (E, ϕ), where E is the principal G-bundle on Σ
and ϕ ∈ H 0(Σ, ad(E) ⊗ K(D)) is the meromorphic section with poles in the finite set of
points D on Σ. Moreover, residues of meromorphic sections in a symplectic leaf belong
to fixed coadjoint orbits of Lie algebra g. In section 3 we concentrate on those symplectic
leaves for which meromorphic sections of G-Higgs bundles have nilpotent residues.
One of the conjectures in [11] essentially states that the Hitchin map from DW (Q)
factors through an affine space MCoulomb(Q). In section 4, we propose a further detailed
1
2
DENIS DEGTYAREV
version of the conjecture about the structure of the Coulomb branch of the theory Q
suggested in [11]. According to our conjecture, we identify the Coulomb branch of the
theory Q with the affinization of the suitably defined finite cover of the symplectic leaf of
the moduli space of meromorphic G-Higgs bundles.
2. Preliminaries
2.1. Generalities on moduli space of Higgs bundles. Let Σ be a smooth complete
algebraic curve of genus g, K its canonical line bundle. Let G be a complex semisimple
Lie group with the Lie algebra g.
2.1.1. Meromorphic Higgs pairs. A holomorphic K-valued G-Higgs pair on Σ is a pair
(E, ϕ) consisting of principal holomorphic G bundle E and a holomorphic section of
the twist adE ⊗ K of its adjoint Lie algebra bundle by canonical line bundle, i.e. ϕ ∈
H 0(Σ, adE ⊗ K). Let D be a closed zero dimensional subscheme of Σ. We will denote
also by D the corresponding effective divisor D := p1 + . . . + pm on Σ, which consist of
distinct points. The pair (E, ϕ) is a meromorphic Higgs pair if ϕ ∈ H 0(Σ, ad(E) ⊗K(D)).
For simplicity, we shall denote K(D) by L .
2.1.2. Stable Higgs bundles. The Higgs pair is (semi-) stable, if for any ϕ-invariant reduc-
tion σ : X → E/P of E to a maximal parabolic subgroup P ⊂ G, degσ∗TG/P > 0 (resp.
> 0), for more details cf. [10]. Here TG/P is a vertical bundle of E/P → X.
According to [10], there is an analytic coarse moduli space M(G, D) = `c∈π1(G)
of semi-stable pairs (E, ϕ). Connected components of M(D) are labelled by the topolog-
ical type of G bundle E. We will denote the component of topologically trivial G-bundles
also by M(D) for short.
M(G, D, c)
2.2. Poisson structure via levels. In the classical setting of [6] the moduli space of
holomorphic stable Higgs pairs is a partial compactification of the cotangent bundle of
the moduli space of stable vector bundles. Therefore, it has a canonical symplectic struc-
ture. The moduli space M(D) of stable meromorphic Higgs pairs has a natural Poisson
structure, see [1],[7]. We describe a Poisson structure on M(D) in two steps in much the
same way as in the [7] but in a slightly different generality.
(1) As a preliminary step we realize a dense open subset of M(D) as an orbit space
of a Poisson action of a group GD on the cotangent bundle of the moduli space
G-bundles with level structures.
(2) Next we exhibit a two-vector on the smooth locus of M(D) through the use of
the cohomological construction.
bundles with a level structure. We will denote connected component with c = 0 by U(D)
2.2.1. D-level structure. A D-level structure on a G-bundle E is an isomorphism η :
U(G, D, c) be the moduli space of G-principal
ED → G × D. Let U(Σ, G, c, D) = `c∈π1(G)
for short. A point in U(D) is an isomorphism class of pair (E, η). The group eGD of
maps from D to G acts naturally on U(D) by changing the framing data η: an element
ABOUT THE STRUCTURE
3
ef ∈ eGD sends [(E, η)] → [(E,ef ◦ η)] where ef lifts f , [·] denotes the isomorphism class of
a pair. The action of GD factors through its quotient GD := eGD/Z(G) by the diagonal
embedding of the center of G. We will refer to GD as a level group.
2.2.2. The cotangent bundle of U(D). Deformation theory arguments give identification
[(E,η)]U(D) ∼= H 1(Σ, ad(E)(−D)). Using Serre's duality we obtain natural isomorphism:
T ∨
(2.1)
[(E,ϕ)]U(D) ≃ H 0(Σ, adE ⊗ K(D)),
T ∨
a point in T ∨U(D) is an isomorphism class of triple [(E, ϕ, η)] where (P, ϕ) is a Higgs
pair.
The action of the level group GD on U(D) lifts naturally to an action on T ∨U(D):
(2.2)
[(E, ϕ, η)] 7→ [(E, ϕ,ef ◦ η)],
∨
D is given by
where ef ∈ eGD lifts f . The lifted action exhibits several remarkable properties:
(1) T ∨U(D) carries a Poisson action GD with respect to the canonical symplectic form
on the cotangent bundle T ∨U(D).
(2) The moment map µ : T ∨U(D) → g
(2.3)
µ(E, ϕ, η) : A 7→ Res Tr(A · ϕη),
where ϕη := η ◦ ϕ ◦ η−1 ∈ H 0(Σ, g ⊗ K(D)D), A ∈ gD and the residue map
Res : H 0(K(D) ⊗ OD) → H 1(Σ, K) ≃ C.
(3) GD acts freely on the open subset (T ∨U(D))◦ parametrizing isomorphism classes
of triples [(E, ϕ, η)] where (E, η) is a stable pair of G-bundle with D-level structure
and (E, ϕ) is a stable Higgs pair.
The third property of the lifted action makes T ∨U into principal GD-bundle over an open
subset M◦(D) of stable Higgs pairs Ms(D). Hence the canonical symplectic structure
induces a Poisson structure on M◦ ≃ T ∨U ◦(D)/GD.
A canonical global formula for this Poisson structure is obtained via cohomological
techniques. The tangent space to M(D) at a smooth point is identified with the first
hyper-cohomology of the complex K := ad(E)
[ϕ,·]
−−→ ad(E) ⊗ L:
(2.4)
T[(E,ϕ)]M(D) ∼= H1(K)
The dual of the complex K is the complex
(2.5)
K∨ := (ad(E) ⊗ L)∨ ⊗ K
[ϕ,·]∨
−−−→ (ad(E))∨ ⊗ K
Grothendieck duality gives a natural isomorphism H1(K) ∼= H1(K∨)∨. For K we obtain
the canonical isomorphism of complexes K∨ ∼= K ⊗ O(−D). Composing with embedding
i : O(−D) → O we get the morphism of complexes:
I : K∨ → K,
(2.6)
4
DENIS DEGTYAREV
and using the duality we obtain the map
I : H1(K)∨ ∼= H1(K∨) → H1(K).
(2.7)
The map I gives the element ΩD ∈ ⊗2H1(K) which is skew-symmetric. In such a way
we have the global two-vector ΩD on the nonsingular part Mns(D) of the moduli space
M(D). It turns out that restriction of ΩD to M◦(D) is induced by the above Poisson
structure on the quotient T ∨U ◦(D)/GD. The two-vector is then automatically Poisson.
3. Integrable systems on symplectic leaves and their covers.
3.1. Marsden-Weinstein reduction. The moment map 2.3 determines the foliation
by symplectic leaves on Ms(D). Let µ([(E, ϕ, η)]) = e, where [(E, ϕ, η)] ∈ T ∨U(D), let
Oe ⊂ g
D be the stabilizer of e. Then the
symplectic leaf M(Oe) through [(E, ϕ, η)] is the connected component of
D be the coadjoint orbit through e and let Ge
∨
(3.1)
µ−1(Oe)/GD
∼= µ−1(e)/Ge
D,
see [9] for details . Markman made remarkable observation in [7] that the moduli space of
stable meromorphic Higgs pairs Ms(D) is a completely integrable system. The lagrangian
H 0(Σ, Ldi) where di is
fibration of Ms(D) is given by the Hitchin map h : Ms(D) →Li=1
the degree of the generator hi of the algebra C[h1, . . . , hr] of invariant polynomials on g
with r = rk g. The symplectic leaf M(Oe) under the simplifying technical assumptions
on the orbit Oe admits analogous construction, see [8]. In particular, the restriction of
the Hitchin map h to the symplectic leaf M(Oe) is a Lagrangian fibration.
Remark 3.1. An element [(E, ϕ)] ∈ Ms(D) belongs to the symplectic leaf M(Oe) if
Respj ϕ ∈ Oej at each pj, j = 1, . . . , m.
The cohomological identification of the Possion structure affords an opportunity to
determine its rank on the symplectic leaf M(Oe) ([7]). The rank of ΩD at [(E, ϕ)] ∈ M(D)
is equal to
(3.2)
rk ΩD = 2(g − 1)dim G +
dim Oej ,
mXj=1
as a consequence dimension of the generic fiber equal to 1
2ΩD.
3.2. Covers of symplectic leaves. Let g be a semisimple algebra of classical type. G
will denote the Lie group of adjoint type.
3.2.1. Nilpotent orbits. From now on we assume that coadjoint orbit Oe is nilpotent, i.e.
∼= Oe1 × . . . × Oem is an orbit of the nilpotent element
each component Oej ∈ g in Oe
ej ∈ g. In this situation the component group A(Oej ) := Gej /(Gej )0 is either trivial or a
finite product of Z/2, see [2]. The precise structure of A(Oej ) is completely determined
by the partition dj := [dj
] of the nilpotent orbit Oej = Odj .
1, . . . , dj
Nj
ABOUT THE STRUCTURE
5
3.2.2. Covers. In view of the right hand side of the isomorphism 3.1, it is natural to
D)0.
consider a covering space for M(D). We will denote by fM(Oe) the quotient µ−1(e)/(Ge
Let p : fM(Oe) → M(Oe) be the projection map.
4. Coulomb branch
Now deal with the restriction of the Hitchin map to the symplectic leaf M(Oe) for the
nilpotent orbit Oe:
(4.1)
h = (h1, . . . , hr) : Ms
O → B :=
H 0 Σ, K di +
νdi(pj)pj!
mXj=1
rMi=1
where νdi(pj) is the pole order of the di-differential at the point pj. Let X aff := Spec(X, OX )
denote the affinization of an algebraic variety, let C[X] denote the ring of regular functions
on X. We propose the following.
Conjecture 4.1. The canonical morphism f : M(Oe) → Maff(Oe) can be included into
the commutative diagram:
fMOe
p
MOe
eh
h
Maff
Oe
f
B
where the finite morphism f is induced by the ring morphism u : C[MOe] → C[fMOe].
Remark 4.2. The main value of the conjecture is that we obtain the isomorphism
Oe has expected dimension. In accordance
MCoulomb
with the above conjecture and the expression for the rank of ΩD we have dim Maff
Oe =
1
2rkΩD = (g − 1)dimG +
Oe. It is remarkable that Maff
1
2dim Oej .
∼= Maff
mPj=1
References
[1] F. Bottacin. Symplectic geometry on moduli spaces of stable pairs. Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. (4),
28(4):391433, 1995.
[2] Collingwood D., McGovern w., Nilpotent orbits in semisimple Lie algebras. Van Nostrand Reinhold-
Mathematics Series. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, 1993.
[3] Chacaltana O., Distler J., Tachikawa Y., Nilpotent orbits and codimension-two defects of 6d N=(2,0)
theories, preprint arXiv:1203.2930v1
[4] Donagi R., Seiberg-Witten integrable systems, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 3-43, 1995.
[5] Donagi R., Markman E., Spectral curves, algebraically completely integrable Hamiltonian systems,
and moduli of bundles, preprint: arXiv:alg-geom/9507017v2
[6] Hitchin N., Stable bundles and integrable systems. Duke Math. J. 54, No 1 91-114 (1987)
[7] Markman E., Spectral curves and integrable systems", Compositio Math. , 93(3):255290, 1994.
6
DENIS DEGTYAREV
[8] Markman E., Integrable Systems, Algebraic Geometry and Seiberg- Witten Theory. In Integrability:
the Seiberg-Witten and Whitham equations, eds H.W. Braden and I.M. Krichever, 23-41. Amsterdam:
Gordon and Breach Science Publishers. 1999
[9] Marsden J., Weinstein J., Reduction of symplectic manifolds with symmetry, Reports on mathemat-
ical physics., 1974.
[10] Ramanathan A., Stable principal bundles on a compact Riemann surface, Math. Ann., 213:129 152,
1975.
[11] Tachikawa Y., On some conjectures extracted from supersymmetric quantum field theories,
http://member.ipmu.jp/yuji.tachikawa/not-on-arxiv.html
National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, RUSSIA
E-mail address: [email protected]
|
1905.09366 | 1 | 1905 | 2019-05-22T21:15:39 | On the Schottky problem for genus five Jacobians with a vanishing theta null | [
"math.AG",
"math.CV"
] | We give a solution to the weak Schottky problem for genus five Jacobians with a vanishing theta null, answering a question of Grushevsky and Salvati Manni. More precisely, we show that if a principally polarized abelian variety of dimension five has a vanishing theta null with a quadric tangent cone of rank at most three, then it is in the Jacobian locus, up to extra irreducible components. We employ a degeneration argument, together with a study of the ramification loci for the Gauss map of a theta divisor. | math.AG | math | On the Schottky problem for genus five
Jacobians with a vanishing theta null
Daniele Agostini and Lynn Chua
Abstract
We give a solution to the weak Schottky problem for genus five Jacobians with a
vanishing theta null, answering a question of Grushevsky and Salvati Manni. More
precisely, we show that if a principally polarized abelian variety of dimension five has
a vanishing theta null with a quadric tangent cone of rank at most three, then it is
in the Jacobian locus, up to extra irreducible components. We employ a degeneration
argument, together with a study of the ramification loci for the Gauss map of a theta
divisor.
9
1
0
2
y
a
M
2
2
]
.
G
A
h
t
a
m
[
1
v
6
6
3
9
0
.
5
0
9
1
:
v
i
X
r
a
1
Introduction
The Schottky problem asks to recognize the Jacobian locus Jg inside the moduli space Ag
of principally polarized abelian varieties of dimension at least 4, and it has been a central
problem in algebraic geometry for more than a century. In the most classical interpretation,
the problem asks for equations in the period matrix τ that vanish exactly on the Jacobian
locus.
In this form, the Schottky problem is completely solved only in genus 4, with an
explicit equation given by Schottky [Sch88] and Igusa [Igu81]. The weak Schottky problem
asks for explicit equations that characterize Jacobians up to extra irreducible components. A
solution to this problem was given in genus 5 by Accola [Acc83] and, in a recent breakthrough,
by Farkas, Grushevsky and Salvati Manni in all genera [FGS17].
There have been many other approaches to the Schottky problem over the years; see
[Gru12] for a recent survey. One noteworthy approach is the study of the singularities of
the theta divisor. Indeed, Riemann's singularity theorem says that the theta divisor Θ of
a genus g Jacobian has a singular locus of dimension at least g − 4. Andreotti and Mayer
[AM67] proved that the locus of abelian varieties with this property contains Jg as an
irreducible component, thus providing a solution to the weak Schottky problem. Moreover,
the singularities of the theta divisor have a deep relationship with the geometry of Ag. In
genus five, this has been thoroughly explored in [FGMV14].
In this work, we focus on Jacobians with a vanishing theta null, which is an even two-
torsion point in the theta divisor. The abelian varieties with this property have been intensely
studied [Mum83, Bea77, Deb92, GM07, GM08] and they form a divisor θnull in Ag. The
Schottky problem in this case becomes that of recognizing Jg ∩ θnull inside θnull.
1
The first observation is that a vanishing theta null is automatically a singular point of
the theta divisor. Hence, following the Andreotti-Mayer philosophy, one is led to study the
local structure of Θ around the singular point, and the first natural invariant is the rank
of the quadric tangent cone. More precisely, if the divisor is cut out by a theta function,
Θ = {θ = 0}, then the quadric tangent cone QpΘ at p ∈ Θsing is defined by the Hessian
matrix evaluated at p:
QpΘ ∼
∂ 2θ
∂z1
∂ 2θ
2
∂z1∂z2
...
∂ 2θ
∂z1∂z2
∂ 2θ
∂z2
2
...
∂ 2θ
∂ 2θ
∂z1∂zg
∂z2∂zg
· · ·
· · ·
. . .
· · ·
∂ 2θ
∂z1∂zg
∂ 2θ
∂z2∂zg
...
∂ 2θ
∂z2
g
.
(1.1)
The rank of QpΘ is the rank of the Hessian. This leads to a stratification of θnull, first
introduced by Grushevsky and Salvati Manni [GM08],
θ0
null ⊆ θ1
null ⊆ · · · ⊆ θg−1
null ⊆ θg
null = θnull
(1.2)
where θh
null is the locus of abelian varieties with a vanishing theta null, with a quadric tangent
cone of rank at most h. In particular, if a Jacobian has a vanishing theta null, then a result
of Kempf [Kem73] shows that the quadric tangent cone has rank at most three, hence
Jg ∩ θnull ⊆ θ3
null .
(1.3)
Grushevsky and Salvati Manni proved in [GM08] that this inclusion is actually an equality in
genus 4, confirming a conjecture of H. Farkas. In the same paper, they ask whether Jg ∩ θnull
is an irreducible component of θ3
null in higher genera, which would imply a solution to the
weak Schottky problem for Jacobians with a vanishing theta null. Our main result is an
affirmative answer to this question in genus 5.
Theorem 1.1. In genus five, the locus J5 ∩ θnull is an irreducible component of θ3
null.
This solution to the weak Schottky problem is very much in the classical spirit of finding
explicit equations in the period matrix. Indeed, the condition of having an even two-torsion
point in the theta divisor can be checked by evaluating the theta function at these (finitely
many) points, and then the rank of the Hessian can be computed numerically. We include
an example of this computation in Example 5.9, where we use the Julia package presented in
our companion paper [AC19]. For a similar computational approach to the Schottky problem
in genus four, see [CKS18].
1
The strategy of our proof is to bound the dimension of θ3
null, by working over a partial
compactification Ag
= Ag ∪ ∂Ag of Ag, following [GM07]. Via a study of nodal curves with
a theta characteristic, we can describe the intersection (J5 ∩ θnull) ∩ ∂Ag. We can then bound
the dimension θ3
null ∩ ∂Ag via a study of the ramification loci, or Thom-Boardman loci, for
the Gauss map of the theta divisor, leading to the proof of our main theorem. In particular,
the study of these ramification loci fits with classical and recent work on the Gauss map
2
[And58, AMSV93, Kra15, CGS17, ACM19], and might give a way to extend our main result
in higher dimensions.
Acknowledgments: We are grateful to Bernd Sturmfels for suggesting to study the
Schottky problem in genus five, and for his continuous encouragement. We thank Paul
Breiding, Gavril Farkas, Sam Grushevsky, Thomas Kramer, Riccardo Salvati Manni, Andrey
Soldatenkov, Sasha Timme and Sandro Verra for useful comments and discussions. This
project was initated at the Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences in Leipzig,
which both authors would like to thank for the hospitality and support at various stages of
this work.
2 Preliminaries
We start by defining some standard notation and background, referring the reader to [Igu72,
BL04] for more details. The Siegel upper-half space Hg is the set of complex symmetric g × g
matrices with positive definite imaginary part. A characteristic is an element m ∈ (Z/2Z)2g,
which we will represent as a vector m = [ε, δ], where ε, δ ∈ {0, 1}g. The theta function with
characteristic m is the holomorphic function θ[m] : Cg × Hg → C defined as
θ[m](z, τ ) := Xn∈Zg
exp(cid:18)πi(cid:16)n +
ε
2(cid:17)t
τ (cid:16)n +
ε
2(cid:17) + 2πi(cid:16)n +
ε
2(cid:17)t(cid:18)z +
δ
2(cid:19)(cid:19) .
(2.1)
The theta function with characteristic m = [0, 0] is called the Riemann theta function, which
we will sometimes denote simply by θ(z, τ ). All theta functions satisfy the fundamental heat
equation,
∂2θ[m]
∂zi∂zj
(z, τ ) = (1 + δij) · 2πi
∂θ[m]
∂τij
(z, τ ) .
(2.2)
The sign of a characteristic m is defined as e(m) = (−1)εtδ, and we call a characteristic even
or odd if the sign is 1 or −1 respectively. As a function of z, θ[m](z, τ ) is even (respectively
odd) if and only if the characteristic m is even (respectively odd). There are 2g−1(2g + 1)
even theta characteristics and 2g−1(2g −1) odd theta characteristics. The theta constants are
the functions on Hg obtained by evaluating the theta functions with characteristic at z = 0,
θ[m](τ ) := θ[m](0, τ ) .
(2.3)
The theta constants corresponding to odd characteristics vanish identically.
Now we recall the construction of the moduli space Ag. For every τ ∈ Hg one defines
a principally polarized abelian variety (ppav) by Aτ = Cg/Λτ , where Λτ = Zg ⊕ τ Zg. The
polarization on Aτ is given by the theta divisor Θτ = {z θ(z, τ ) = 0}. Observe that the
symmetric theta divisors on Aτ are precisely the divisors Θ[m]
τ = {z θ[m](z, τ ) = 0}, which
are translates of Θτ by two-torsion points.
The modular group Γg = Sp(2g, Z) acts on Hg as follows. For γ ∈ Γg and τ ∈ Hg,
γ = (cid:18)A B
C D(cid:19) ,
γ · τ = (Aτ + B)(Cτ + D)−1 .
(2.4)
3
Two ppavs (Aτ , Θτ ) and (Aτ ′, Θτ ′) are isomorphic if and only if τ ′ = γ · τ for some γ ∈ Γg,
in which case an isomorphism is given by
Aτ −→ Aγ·τ ,
z 7→ (Cτ + D)−tz .
(2.5)
The quotient Ag = Hg/ Sp(2g, Z) is the moduli space of principally polarized abelian
varieties of dimension g. It is an analytic space of dimension
dim Ag = dim Hg =
g(g + 1)
2
.
(2.6)
We next describe how the theta functions transform under the modular group Γg. The
action on Hg extends to an action on Cg × Hg by
γ = (cid:18)A B
C D(cid:19) ,
γ · (z, τ ) = ((Cτ + D)−tz, γ · τ ) .
(2.7)
The corresponding action on the set of characteristics (Z/2Z)2g is
γ = (cid:18)A B
C D(cid:19) ,
γ ·(cid:20)ε
δ(cid:21) = (cid:18) D −C
−B A (cid:19)(cid:20)ε
diag(ABt)(cid:21) .
δ(cid:21) +(cid:20)diag(CDt)
(2.8)
This can be combined with the action of the lattice Zg to give the universal family of abelian
varieties Xg = (Cg ×Hg)/Z2g ⋊Γg → Ag. The theta functions obey the Theta Transformation
Formula [BL04]:
θ[γ · m](γ · (z, τ )) = φ(γ, m, z, τ ) ·pdet(Cτ + D) · θ[m](z, τ )
(2.9)
where φ(γ, m, z, τ ) ∈ C∗ is an explicit function of the parameters with the same sign ambi-
is sent
, so the universal theta divisor {(z, τ ) θ(z, τ ) = 0} is not well defined in
guity as pdet(Cτ + D). In particular, for a fixed τ , the symmetric theta divisor Θ[m]
by γ ∈ Γ to Θγ·[m]
Xg. To address this issue, we define the subgroups
γ·τ
τ
Γg(4) := {γ ∈ Γg γ ≡ Id mod 4} ,
Γg(4, 8) := (cid:26)(cid:18)A B
C D(cid:19) ∈ Γg(4) diag(AtB) ≡ diag(C tB) ≡ 0 mod 8(cid:27) .
(2.10)
(2.11)
The group Γg(4, 8) is normal of finite index in Γg, so the corresponding quotients Ag(4, 8) :=
Hg/Γg(4, 8) and Xg(4, 8) := (Cg × Hg)/(Z2g ⋊ Γg(4, 8)) are finite Galois covers of Ag and
Xg respectively. Moreover, Γg(4, 8) acts trivially on the set of characteristics, so the Theta
Transformation Formula shows that for every characteristic m, the universal theta divisor
Θ[m] = {(z, τ ) θ[m](z, τ ) = 0} = [τ ∈Ag (4,8)
Θ[m]
τ
(2.12)
4
is well-defined in Xg(4, 8). However, we see that the divisor 2Θ = {2z z ∈ Θ} is defined
universally inside Xg. Indeed, for any characteristic m, we have 2Θ[m]
, because Θ[m]
and Θ[0] differ just by a translation by a two-torsion point. Hence we get a well-defined set
τ = 2Θ[0,0]
τ
2Θ = {(2z, τ ) θ(z, τ ) = 0} = [τ ∈Ag
2Θτ
inside Xg. Finally, it holds that for every γ ∈ Γg(4, 8),
Thus, the even theta constants define a map to projective space,
θ[m](0, γ · τ ) = pdet(Cτ + D) · θ[m](0, τ ) .
(2.13)
(2.14)
Ag(4, 8) −→ P2g−1(2g +1)−1 ,
[τ ] 7→ [θ[m](0, τ )]m even
(2.15)
which is actually an embedding, and realizes Ag(4, 8) as an irreducible quasiprojective vari-
ety. By definition, polynomials in the homogeneous coordinates of P2g−1(2g +1) correspond to
polynomials in the theta constants.
We would like to point out that, due to the very concrete nature of the theta functions,
much of the geometry of abelian varieties presented above can be computed explicitly, espe-
cially in low genus; see for example [CKS18, RSSS13, RSS14, FM17].
3 Singularities of theta divisors at points of order two
For a general ppav (A, Θ) ∈ Ag, the theta divisor is smooth. The locus N0 ⊆ Ag where
the theta divisor is singular is called the Andreotti-Mayer locus, and it is a divisor in Ag
[AM67]. Mumford [Mum83], Beauville [Bea77] and Debarre [Deb92] proved that N0 has
two irreducible components θnull and N ′
0. The component θnull is the locus where the theta
divisor contains an even two-torsion point of A, a so-called vanishing theta null, and N ′
0 is
the residual component. Theta divisors containing even two-torsion points correspond to
period matrices τ such that θ[m](0, τ ) = 0 for some even characteristic m. These points
are always singular, since all the derivatives ∂θ[m]
are odd. Moreover, we can give explicit
∂zi
equations for the lift of θnull in Ag(4, 8) as
θnull = {τ θ[m](0, τ ) = 0, for some even characteristic m} .
(3.1)
Thus, on Ag(4, 8) the divisor θnull splits into irreducible components corresponding to the
even characteristics, and these components are all conjugate under the action of Γg.
As explained in Section 1, the rank of the quadric tangent cone at the vanishing theta
null leads to a stratification
θ0
null ⊆ θ1
null ⊆ · · · ⊆ θg−1
null ⊆ θg
null = θnull
(3.2)
5
where θh
quadric tangent cone of rank at most h. In Ag(4, 8), the locus θh
null is the locus of ppav whose theta divisor contain an even two-torsion point with a
null is given by the equations
θh
null = (cid:26)τ ∈ Ag(4, 8) ∃ m even: θ[m](0, τ ) = 0, rk(cid:18)∂2θ[m]
= (cid:26)τ ∈ Ag(4, 8) ∃ m even: θ[m](0, τ ) = 0, rk(cid:18)(1 + δij)
∂zi∂zj
(0, τ )(cid:19) ≤ h(cid:27)
∂θ[m]
∂τij
(0, τ )(cid:19) ≤ h(cid:27)
(3.3)
where the second equality comes from the heat equation (2.2). One should be slightly careful
with this description because, as noted by Grushevsky and Salvati Manni, the condition
nrk(cid:16)(1 + δij) ∂θ[m]
∂τij
(0, τ )(cid:17) ≤ ho is not well-defined on Ag(4, 8); it is well-defined only together
with the condition {θ[m](0, τ ) = 0}. An alternative set of equations that fixes this problem
is given in [GM08].
If C is a smooth curve of genus g, a vanishing theta null on the Jacobian J(C) corresponds
to an even theta characteristic κ such that h0(C, κ) ≥ 2. As explained in Section 1,
Jg ∩ θnull ⊆ θ3
null .
(3.4)
In [GM08], it was proved that this is an equality in genus four, and it was asked whether
Jg ∩ θnull is an irreducible component of θ3
null in higher genus. In the rest of this paper, we
will discuss this problem and present a proof for genus five.
4 Partial compactification and Gauss maps
Our strategy is to bound the dimension of the irreducible component of θ3
Jg ∩ θnull. To do so, we will use a partial compactification of Ag.
null which contains
4.1 Partial compactification of Ag
The idea is to follow the strategy of [GM07], by studying the boundary of θ3
null inside the
1
g = Ag ∪ ∂Ag of Ag. This was introduced by [Igu67] and then
partial compactification A
studied by Mumford [Mum83]. The boundary divisor ∂Ag parametrizes rank one degener-
ations of ppavs, which we briefly describe here, referring to [Mum83] for more details. Let
(B, Ξ) ∈ Ag−1 be a ppav and let G be an algebraic group, which is an extension of B by C∗:
0 −→ C∗ −→ G −→ B −→ 0 .
(4.1)
Then we can look at G as a C∗-bundle on B, which can be completed naturally to a P1-bundle,
together with two sections B0, B∞. These sections can be glued together via translation by
a point b ∈ B, and the resulting variety G is a limit of abelian varieties. It also carries a
divisor D ⊆ G, which is a limit of theta divisors. Thus, the boundary divisor is a fibration
p : ∂Ag → Ag−1, with fiber B/ Aut(B, Ξ) over (B, Ξ) ∈ Ag−1, and the general fiber is B/h±1i,
the Kummer variety of B. Analytically, points on the boundary can be seen as limits of g ×g
6
period matrices τ = τ (t) such that the imaginary part of τgg goes to +∞ as t → 0, and all
the other coordinates converge. Hence, the limit has the form
τ = (cid:18) τ ′
z′t
z′
i∞(cid:19)
(4.2)
where τ ′ is the period matrix of (B, Ξ) ∈ Ag−1 and z′ represents the translation point b ∈ B.
Hence we see that, at least around a point (B, Ξ) ∈ Ag−1, we have a surjective map
Xg−1 → ∂Ag−1
(4.3)
that over (B, Ξ) corresponds to B → B/ Aut(B).
The boundary of the theta null divisor in the partial compactification was computed by
Mumford [Mum83].
1
Theorem 4.1 (Mumford). Let θnull be the closure of the theta null divisor in A
g. Then
θnull ∩ ∂Ag−1 =
[(B,Ξ)
2B(Ξ)
∪ p−1(θnull,g−1)
(4.4)
where 2B(Ξ) = {2x x ∈ Ξ} is the image of the divisor under the multiplication map.
More precisely, by S 2B(Ξ) we mean the image of the universal double theta divisor of
(2.13) under the map Xg−1 → ∂Ag−1. We denote this component by Xg and sometimes we
will not distinguish whether we take it in Xg−1 or in ∂Ag−1. By (2.13) we can write
Xg = {(2z′, τ ′) θ′ (z′, τ ′) = 0}
(4.5)
where now θ′ is the Riemann theta function in genus g − 1. The intersections of the strata
θh
null with Xg were determined by Grushevsky and Salvati Manni [GM07].
Theorem 4.2 (Grushevsky, Salvati Manni). Denote again by θh
corresponding stratum in Ag. Define the matrix
null the closure in A
1
g of the
Dγ(z′, τ ′) :=
evaluated at (z′, τ ′). Then
2
∂ 2θ′
∂z ′
1
∂ 2θ′
1∂z ′
2
∂z ′
...
∂z ′
2
∂ 2θ′
1∂z ′
∂ 2θ′
∂z ′
2
2
...
∂z ′
∂ 2θ′
1∂z ′
∂θ′
∂z ′
1
g−1
g−1
∂z ′
∂ 2θ′
2∂z ′
∂θ′
∂z ′
2
· · ·
· · ·
. . .
· · ·
· · ·
∂θ′
1∂z ′
∂θ′
2∂z ′
∂z ′
∂z ′
g−1
g−1
...
∂θ′
∂z ′ 2
∂θ′
g−1
∂z ′
g−1
∂θ′
∂z ′
1
∂θ′
∂z ′
2
...
∂θ′
g−1
∂z ′
0
(4.6)
null ∩ Xg = {(2z′, τ ′) θ′ (z′, τ ′) = 0, rk Dγ (z′, τ ′) ≤ h} .
θh
(4.7)
7
4.2 Thom-Boardman loci of the Gauss map
The last result is best understood in terms of the Gauss map for the theta divisor.
(B, Ξ) ∈ Ag−1 is a ppav, then the Gauss map is the rational map
If
γ : Ξ 99K P(T0B)
(4.8)
that associates to each smooth point p ∈ Ξ the tangent space TpΞ, seen as a subspace of
T0B via translation by p. The base locus of the map is precisely the singular locus of Ξ, and
if Ξ = {θ′(z′, τ ′) = 0}, then the Gauss map can be written explicitly as
γ = (cid:20) ∂θ′
∂z′
1
, . . . ,
∂θ′
∂zg−1(cid:21) .
(4.9)
The Gauss map is related to Theorem 4.2 by the following result, whose proof is the same
as [GM07, Lemma 2]; see also [DJ10, Roh14].
Lemma 4.3. Let (B, Ξ) ∈ Ag−1 be a ppav, with the theta divisor given as Ξ = {θ′(z′, τ ′) = 0}.
If z′ ∈ Ξ is a smooth point, then
rk Dγ(z′, τ ′) ≤ h
if and only if
rk dγz ′ ≤ h − 2
(4.10)
where dγz ′ is the differential of the Gauss map at z′. If instead z′ ∈ Ξ is a singular point,
rk Dγ(z′, τ ′) ≤ h
if and only if
rk Qz ′Ξ ≤ h
(4.11)
where Qz ′Ξ is the quadric tangent cone to Ξ at z′.
For a map f : X → Y between two smooth connected varieties, the (closed) Thom-
Boardman loci are defined as
Σi(f ) := {p ∈ X dim ker dfp ≥ i} ,
Σi(f ) := Σdim X−i(f ) = {p ∈ X rk dfp ≤ i} .
(4.12)
(4.13)
Hence we can interpret Lemma 4.3 as saying that for a theta divisor Ξτ ′ = {θ′(z′, τ ′) = 0},
the locus of smooth points where rk Dγ(z′, τ ′) ≤ h coincides with the Thom-Boardman locus
τ ′ → Pg−2. Moreover, Lemma 4.3 suggests also that the
Σh−2(γτ ′) of the Gauss map γτ ′ : Ξsm
Thom-Boardman loci can be naturally extended to a closed subset of Ξ by
Σh−2(γτ ′) = Σh−2(γτ ′) ∪ {z′ ∈ Ξsing rk Qz ′Ξτ ′ ≤ h} .
(4.14)
Thus Theorem 4.2 can be rephrased as saying that
θh
null ∩ Xg = [(B,Ξ)∈Ag−1
2B(Σh−2(γΞ)) ,
(4.15)
where the set on the right can be viewed as the universal second multiple of the Thom-
Boardman locus inside the universal family Xg−1 → Ag−1. Observe that this is well-defined
in Xg−1 because of the multiplication by two.
8
5 Jacobians with a vanishing theta null in genus five
Now we turn to the proof of our main theorem. To begin with, we observe that Jg ∩ θnull is
the image under the Torelli map of the locus of curves with a vanishing theta null. It was
proved by Teixidor [TiB88] that this is an irreducible divisor in Mg, and since the Torelli
map is injective, we see that Jg ∩ θnull is irreducible of dimension 3g − 4. What we need to
prove is that the irreducible component Zg of θ3
null which contains Jg ∩ θnull has the same
dimension. Equivalently, we can compute the codimension inside the divisor θnull, and we
expect that
codimθnull(Zg) ≥ codimθnull(Jg ∩ θnull) =
g(g + 1)
2
− 1 − (3g − 4) =
1
2
(g − 2)(g − 3) . (5.1)
We can bound the codimension of Zg by considering its intersection with Xg. More precisely,
we proceed in two steps.
1. Prove that Jg ∩θnull intersects Xg at a smooth point of θnull. Then Zg also intersects Xg
at a smooth point of θnull, and it is a standard fact that codimθnull Zg ≥ codimXg(Zg ∩
Xg).
2. Show that codimXg(θ3
2)(g − 3), and from the previous step we have codimθnull Zg ≥ 1
null ∩ Xg) ≥ 1
2(g − 2)(g − 3). Then codimXg(Zg ∩ Xg) ≥ 1
2 (g −
2(g − 2)(g − 3) as well.
We proceed to carry out these steps in genus five.
5.1 Limits of Jacobians in the partial compactification
Here we consider points in the intersection Jg ∩ ∂Ag coming from nodal curves. Let C be a
smooth and irreducible curve of genus g − 1 ≥ 4 with two distinct marked points p, q ∈ C,
and let C be the nodal curve obtained by identifying these two points. This is a stable curve
of arithmetic genus g and the map ν : C → C is the normalization.
The group Pic0(C) fits naturally into an exact sequence [ACG11]
0 −→ C∗ −→ Pic0(C) ν ∗
−→ J(C) −→ 0
(5.2)
where J(C) = Pic0(C) is the Jacobian of C. This says that a bundle L on C is equivalent to
a bundle L on C, together with an identification of the two fibers L(p), L(q), which is given
by an element in C∗. Hence we see that Pic0(C) is a rank one extension of the ppav J(C),
as in (4.1). Moreover, in this situation we also have a natural element in J(C) given by
O(p − q). According to the description of Section 4.1, this gives us an element in Jg ∩ ∂Ag.
Now we consider nodal curves with a vanishing theta null, following Cornalba's construc-
tion [Cor89, Example 3.2, Example 6.2].
Lemma 5.1. Let L be a line bundle on C such that 2L ∼ KC + p + q. Then L descends to
a line bundle L on C such that 2L ∼ KC and h0(C, L) = h0(C, L).
9
Proof. We sketch the proof here, referring to [Cor89] for more details. First we observe that
deg L = g − 1, and the Riemann-Roch theorem shows that h0(C, L − p − q) = h0(C, L) − 1,
so the linear system of L does not separate the two points p, q. Moreover, this shows that
there is a section σ0 ∈ H 0(C, L) that does not vanish at either p or q; in fact σ0 does not
vanish at both points. Indeed, suppose that σ0(q) = 0 and σ0(p) 6= 0. Then σ2
0 is a section
of 2L(−q) ∼ KC + p − q that does not vanish at p, which cannot happen because p is a base
point of KC + p − q, since C has positive genus.
Hence, we can identify the two fibers of L(p), L(q) by identifying σ0(p) with σ0(q). This
induces a line bundle L on C such that 2L ∼ KC, and the sections H 0(C, L) correspond to
sections σ ∈ H 0(C, L) such that σ(p) = σ(q). Moreover, we know that H 0(C, L) does not
separate p, q, which means precisely that H 0(C, L) = H 0(C, L).
According to [Cor89], this gives a theta characteristic on C, and if h0(C, L) = 2, we get
that h0(C, L) = 2, so this is an even and effective theta characteristic on C. This actually
gives an element in (Jg ∩ θnull) ∩ Xg as follows.
Lemma 5.2. Let L be a line bundle on C such that 2L ∼ KC + p + q and h0(C, L) = 2.
Then (J(C), O(p − q)) gives a point in (Jg ∩ θnull) ∩ Xg.
Proof. According to the description of Section 4.1, we need to show that O(p − q) ∈ 2 · Θ,
where Θ ⊆ J(C) is a symmetric theta divisor. Recall that all the symmetric theta divisors on
J(C) are of the form Wg−2(C) − κ, where Wg−2(C) = {M ∈ Picg−2(C) h0(C, M) > 0}, and
κ is a theta characteristic, hence 2 · Θ = 2 · Wg−2(C) − KC. Then we observe that L(−q) ∈
Wg−2(C) and moreover 2L(−q) ∼ KC +p−q, so p−q ∼ 2L(−q)−KC ∈ 2·Wg−2(C)−KC.
Via this construction, we obtain many points in (Jg∩θnull)∩Xg and we can give conditions
for these to be smooth points of θnull. This is done in the next two lemmas.
Lemma 5.3. Let (B, Ξ) ∈ Ag−1 be such that Aut(B, Ξ) = {±1} and let b ∈ 2B(Ξ) be a point
such that
1. b is not a two-torsion point.
2. The set 2−1
B (b) ∩ Ξ consists precisely of one point b′.
3. The point b′ has multiplicity at most two in Ξ.
Then (B, Ξ) and b give a smooth point of Xg which is also a smooth point of θnull.
Proof. First observe that Xg is a component of the intersection of the two divisors θnull and
∂Ag, so a smooth point in Xg is smooth in both θnull and ∂Ag. Hence it is enough to prove
smoothness in Xg.
To do so, we look at the point (b, (B, Ξ)) in the universal abelian variety Xg−1; this gives
a point in ∂Ag via the map Xg−1 → ∂Ag of (4.3). Since we are assuming that (B, Ξ) has no
extra automorphisms and that b is not a two-torsion point, we see that the map is a local
isomorphism around (b, (B, Ξ)), hence we can work in Xg−1 instead of in ∂Ag. Moreover, the
fact that (B, Ξ) has no extra automorphisms also tells us that the map Xg(4, 8) → Xg is a
10
local isomorphism around (b, (B, Ξ)). So we can work directly inside Xg(4, 8), where we can
look at Xg = S(B,Ξ) 2B(Ξ) as the image of the universal theta divisor Ξg−1 = S(B,Ξ) Ξ under
the global multiplication-by-two map 2 : Xg−1(4, 8) → Xg−1(4, 8).
Now, our second assumption on b shows that the fiber of this map over (b, (B, Ξ)) consists
of a single point (b′, (B, Ξ)). We also know that the differential of the multiplication-by-2 map
is just the usual scalar multiplication by 2, so it is an isomorphism. Hence, the tangent space
to Xg at (b, (B, Ξ)) is isomorphic to the tangent space to the universal theta divisor Ξg−1 at
(b′, (B, Ξ)). In local coordinates (z′, τ ′), the universal theta divisor is given by {θ(z′, τ ′) = 0},
and the heat equation shows that a point (z′, τ ′) is singular if and only if z′ is a singular point
of Ξτ ′ of multiplicity at least 3, which in our case is ruled out by the third assumption.
Lemma 5.4. Let C be a smooth curve of genus g − 1 ≥ 4 with only trivial automorphisms
and let D ∈ Cg−3 be an effective divisor such that
1. h0(C, D) = 1.
2. KC − 2D ∼ p + q with p, q two distinct points on C.
3. h0(C, η + D) = 0 for each η ∈ Pic0(C)[2] \ {OC}.
Then J(C) together with the point O(p − q) give a point in (Jg ∩ θnull) ∩ Xg which is a smooth
point of θnull.
Proof. First we observe that deg(KC − 2D) = 2(g − 1) − 2 − 2(g − 3) = 2, and since the curve
is not hyperelliptic, this implies h0(C, KC − 2D) ≤ 1, so the points p, q in (2) are uniquely
determined.
We then apply Lemma 5.3. Since the automorphism group of C is trivial, Torelli's theo-
rem implies that J(C) has no extra automorphisms. Moreover, if κ is any theta characteristic
on C, we can fix the symmetric theta divisor given by Wg−2(C) − κ, and twice the theta divi-
sor is 2Wg−2(C)−KC. Then O(p−q) ∈ 2Wg−2(C)−KC, since if we set L = O(D+p+q), then
2L ∼ KC + p + q because of assumption (2). Reasoning as in the proof of Lemma 5.1, we get
that h0(C, L) = h0(C, D) + 1 = 2, and also h0(C, L(−p)) = h0(C, L(−q)) = h0(C, L) − 1 = 1.
Hence p − q ∼ 2L(−q) − KC, with L(−q) ∈ Wg−2(C).
Now we check the three conditions of Lemma 5.3. We see that O(p − q) cannot be a
two-torsion point, because otherwise 2p ∼ 2q, but p, q are distinct and C is not hyperelliptic.
For the second condition, since p − q ∼ 2L(−q) − KC, we see that
J(C)(p − q) ∩ (Wg−2(C) − κ) ∼= {L(−q) + η η ∈ J(C)[2], h0(L + η − q) > 0} .
2−1
(5.3)
For any η ∈ Pic0(C)[2], we see that 2(L + η) ∼ 2L ∼ KC + p + q, hence from the proof of
Lemma 5.1, h0(C, L + η − q) = h0(C, L + η) − 1 = h0(C, L + η − p − q) = h0(C, D + η). Thus
assumption (3) implies that the intersection (5.3) consists of the unique point L(−q).
For the last condition, we need to check that L(−q) has multiplicity at most two in the
theta divisor Wg−2(C). But Riemann's singularity theorem shows that multL(−q) Wg−2(C) =
h0(C, L − q) = h0(C, L), and h0(C, L) = 1 by assumption (1).
11
We now specialize this discussion to g = 5.
Proposition 5.5. J5 ∩ θnull and X5 intersect at a smooth point of θnull.
Proof. We follow Lemma 5.4. Let C be a general curve of genus 4, with only trivial auto-
morphisms. We consider the locus
Z = {D ∈ C2 h0(C, KC − 2D) > 0}
(5.4)
and we show that a general element in Z satisfies the three conditions of Lemma 5.4. First,
we compute the dimension of Z. The condition h0(C, KC − 2D) > 0 is equivalent to the
fact that the evaluation map evD : H 0(C, KC) → H 0(C, KC ⊗ O2D) is not injective, or not
an isomorphism, since h0(C, KC) = h0(C, KC ⊗ O2D) = 4. The evaluation map globalizes
to a map of rank four bundles ev : H 0(C, KC) ⊗ OC2 → E on C2, where the fiber of E at
D ∈ C2 is precisely H 0(C, KC ⊗O2D). Thus, Z is precisely the degeneracy locus of the global
evaluation map. In particular, if we can show that Z 6= ∅ and Z 6= C2, it will follow that Z
is a divisor in C2. To prove this, let x ∈ C be a general point, then h0(C, KC − 2x) = 2, so
after removing the eventual base locus B, we get a map ϕ : C → P1. If y is a point where ϕ
is ramified, we see that D = x + y ∈ Z; if instead y′ is a point outside of B where ϕ is not
ramified, then D′ = x + y′ /∈ Z.
Now we check the conditions in Lemma 5.4. If D ∈ Z, then h0(C, D) = 1, otherwise
the curve would be hyperelliptic. For the second condition, suppose that KC − 2D ∼ 2p for
some p ∈ C. Then KC ∼ 2D + 2p, so OC(D + p) is a theta characteristic on C. There are
only finitely many effective theta characteristics κ and since C is general, they all satisfy
h0(C, κ) = 1. Hence there are only finitely many such D, and since dim Z = 1, a general D
in any component of Z will give KC − 2D ∼ p + q for two distinct points p, q ∈ C.
For the third condition, if we look at C2 in Pic2(C) via the Abel-Jacobi map, we see
that D ∈ Z satisfies the third condition precisely when D /∈ Sη(C2 + η), as η varies in
J(C)[2] \ {OC}. Suppose by contradiction that Z ⊆ Sη(C2 + η) and let Z ′ ⊆ Z be an
irreducible component. Then there must be an η ∈ J(C)[2] \ {OC} such that Z ′ ⊆ C2 + η,
so that Z ′ ⊆ C2 ∩ (C2 + η). In particular dim(C2 ∩ (C2 + η)) ≥ 1, and we will now prove that
this cannot happen. To do so, observe that if dim(C2 ∩ (C2 + η)) ≥ 1, then the difference
map
φ2 : C2 × C2 −→ Pic0(C) ,
(D, E) 7→ D − E
(5.5)
has a positive-dimensional fiber at η, and by [ACGH85, Exercise V.D-4] this is possible only
∼= 2M1 − KC, where
if η ∼= O(x − y) for two distinct points x, y ∈ C, or if η ∼= M1 − M2
1
3 on C and M2 = KC − M1 is the other. The first possibility cannot happen
M1 is one g
because then 2x ∼ 2y, and C is not hyperelliptic. For the second possibility, observe that
if 2M1 − KC is two-torsion, then 4M1 ∼ 2KC. Since C is not hyperelliptic, we know from
Noether's theorem that it is projectively normal in the canonical embedding C ⊆ P3, hence
4M1 ∼ 2KC if and only if for every divisor H ∈ M1, the divisor 4H is cut out by a quadric
in P3. Using Macaulay2 [GS], we can easily find a curve where this does not happen, for
example the curve C = {X0X3 − X1X2 = X 3
3 = 0} and the divisor
H = C ∩ {X2 = X3 = 0}.
0 X1 + X 3
0 + X 2
1 + X 3
2 + X 3
12
5.2 Thom-Boardman loci for the Gauss map in dimension 4
Now we need to bound the codimension of θ3
by studying the Thom-Boardman loci in one dimension less.
null ∩ Xg inside Xg, and by (4.15), we can do it
Lemma 5.6. Suppose that
codimAg−1{(B, Ξ) dim Σ1(γΞ) ≥ i} ≥ i +
(g − 2)(g − 5)
2
,
for i = 0, . . . , g − 2 . (5.6)
Then
codimXg(θ3
null ∩ Xg) ≥
1
2
(g − 2)(g − 3) .
(5.7)
Proof. We know from (4.15) that θ3
mension of this by bounding the dimension of the fibers and of the image along the projection
p : θ3
null ∩ Xg = S(B,Ξ) 2B(Σ1(γΞ)), and we can bound the di-
null ∩ Xg → Ag−1. More precisely we have
dim θ3
null ∩ Xg ≤ max
i=0,...,g−2(cid:0)i + dim{(B, Ξ) ∈ Ag−1 dim 2B(Σ1(γΞ)) ≥ i}(cid:1) .
(5.8)
Since the multiplication 2B : B → B is a finite map, we can replace dim 2B(Σ1(γΞ)) ≥ i by
dim Σ1(γΞ) ≥ i, and if we rephrase the previous inequality in terms of the codimension, we
get exactly what we want.
Remark 5.7. When g > 5, Lemma 5.6 requires that the set
{(B, Ξ) ∈ Ag−1 dim Σ1(γΞ) ≥ 0} = {(B, Ξ) ∈ Ag−1 Σ1(γΞ) 6= ∅}
(5.9)
is a proper subset of Ag−1. However, this cannot happen; indeed, if (B, Ξ) ∈ Ag−1 is a
general ppav, then Ξ contains 2g−1(2g − 1) odd two-torsion points, corresponding to the odd
characteristics. If Ξ is cut out by a theta function Ξ = {θ′(z′, τ ′) = 0} and z′ is an odd
two-torsion point, then one can see that rk Dγ(z′, τ ′) ≤ 2, so z′ ∈ Σ1(γΞ).
However, when g = 5 the hypotheses of Lemma 5.6 are satisfied.
Proposition 5.8. It holds that
codimX5(θ3
null ∩ X5) ≥ 3 .
(5.10)
Proof. According to Lemma 5.6, we need to prove that
codimA4{(B, Ξ) dim Σ1(γΞ) ≥ i} ≥ i ,
for i = 0, 1, 2, 3 .
(5.11)
• For i = 0, this is immediate, though as observed in Remark 5.7, it is crucial that g = 5.
• For i = 1, we need to show that for a general (B, Ξ) ∈ A4, the Thom-Boardman locus
Σ1(γΞ) is finite dimensional. This is proved by Adams, McCrory, Shifrin and Varley
in [AMSV93], where they show that the locus consists exactly of the odd two-torsion
points of Remark 5.7.
13
For the cases where i > 1, we start with a general observation. Assume that the Gauss
map γΞ : Ξsm → P3 has finite fibers, then dim Σ1(γΞ) ≤ 1. Indeed, let Z ⊆ Σ1(γΞ) be an
irreducible component of positive dimension. By construction, the differential of the induced
map γΞZ : Z → P3 has rank at most one at a general point of Z, so dim γΞ(Z) ≤ 1 by generic
smoothness. Since the map has finite fibers, it follows that dim Z ≤ 1. Hence if i > 1, we
can have dim Σ1(γΞ) ≥ i if and only if the locus {z′ ∈ Ξsing rank Qz ′Ξ ≤ 3} has dimension
at least i.
• For i = 2, let (B, Ξ) ∈ A4 be such that Ξ is smooth. Then the Gauss map γΞ : Ξ → P3 is
finite and the singular locus is empty, so the previous observation implies dim Σ1(γΞ) ≤
1. This proves that the locus {(B, Ξ) dim Σ1(γΞ) ≥ 2} is contained in the divisor
N0,4 = {(B, Ξ) Ξsing 6= ∅}. This divisor has two irreducible components, which are
exactly the theta null divisor θnull,4 and the Jacobian locus J4 [Bea77]. Now, let (B, Ξ)
be the Jacobian of a hyperelliptic curve of genus 4. Then (B, Ξ) ∈ θnull,4 ∩ J4 [Bea77],
and since it is a Jacobian, we know that the Gauss map γΞ : Ξsm → P3 has finite fibers
[And58]. Moreover, the singular locus of Ξ has dimension 1, so the previous observation
gives dim Σ(γΞ) ≤ 1. This proves that the locus {(B, Ξ) dim Σ1(γΞ) ≥ 2} does not
contain the intersection θnull,4 ∩ J4; in particular, it does not coincide with any of the
two components, so it has codimension at least two.
• For i = 3, let (B, Ξ) ∈ A4 be such that Ξ is irreducible. Then dim Σ1(γΞ) ≥ 3 if and only
if Σ1(γΞ) = Ξ, but this is impossible because the Gauss map is dominant, so its differ-
ential at a general point is an isomorphism. Hence, the locus {(B, Ξ) dim Σ1(γΞ) ≥ 3}
is contained in the locus of decomposable abelian varieties, which has codimension 3.
5.3 Conclusion
We can finally prove our main theorem, and we rewrite the argument here for clarity.
Proof of Theorem 1.1. We want to show that J5 ∩ θnull is an irreducible component of θ3
null.
As remarked before, we know that J5 ∩ θnull is irreducible of dimension 11, thus if Z5 ⊆ θ3
null
is the irreducible component containing J5 ∩ θnull, we need to show that dim Z5 ≤ 11, or
equivalently, codimθnull Zg ≥ 3. We consider the intersection with X5 inside the partial
compactification A5
; we know from Proposition 5.5 that Z5 and X5 intersect in a smooth
point of θnull, hence codimθnull Z5 ≥ codimX5(Z5 ∩ X5). It is enough to prove that this is
at least 3, or more generally, that codimX5(θ3
null ∩ X5) ≥ 3. This is precisely the bound of
Proposition 5.8.
1
Example 5.9. As we have observed in Section 1, this solution to the Schottky problem is
effective, since the condition of having a vanishing theta null with a quadric cone of rank at
most three can be checked explicitly. We present here an explicit example, where we use the
Julia package for theta functions presented in [AC19]. Consider the period matrix τ ∈ H5
14
given by
0.402434 + 0.684132i
−0.181379 + 0.21894i
0.24323 − 0.134164i
−0.181379 + 0.21894i
0.279144 + 1.01836i
−0.0979857 + 0.462218i
0.24323 − 0.134164i
0.0040306 + 0.0508533i −0.318179 + 0.143837i
−0.0979857 + 0.462218i −0.0656562 + 0.609593i −0.14647 + 0.370062i
0.185582 − 0.150607i
0.190249 + 0.828849i
−0.286061 + 0.0203797i
0.166629 + 0.681357i
0.0040306 + 0.0508533i −0.0656562 + 0.609593i −0.286061 + 0.0203797i
−0.318179 + 0.143837i
−0.14647 + 0.370062i
0.185582 − 0.150607i
0.0413648 + 1.4056i
0.190249 + 0.828849i
0.74873 + 1.01168i
(5.12)
We can computationally check that the theta constant with even characteristic
1 0 1 1 0(cid:21)
m = (cid:20)1 0 0 1 0
vanishes at τ . Moreover, we can compute the corresponding Hessian matrix
−2.79665 + 5.29764i −9.57825 − 9.04671i
18.9738 + 8.34582i
−9.57825 − 9.04671i
7.36305 + 2.28697i
−23.1027 − 3.10545i
−9.31944 − 0.822821i
7.58338 + 5.34729i
6.15667 − 1.90199i
0.524289 − 3.64991i
7.58338 + 5.34729i
7.36305 + 2.28697i
−23.1027 − 3.10545i −9.31944 − 0.822821i
16.8441 − 1.15986i
13.9363 − 4.56541i
−3.32248 + 4.10698i
13.9363 − 4.56541i
2.89309 + 1.21773i
3.86617 − 0.546202i
6.15667 − 1.90199i
0.524289 − 3.64991i
−3.32248 + 4.10698i
3.86617 − 0.546202i
−12.9726 − 1.928i
The Hessian has the following eigenvalues:
47.946229109152995 + 9.491932144035298i
−15.491689246713147 + 3.3401255907497958i
−9.512858919129267 − 1.0587349322052013i
−2.7271385943272036 × 10−15 − 1.1117459994936022i × 10−14
−5.698014266322794 × 10−15 + 6.342925068807627i × 10−15
so it is natural to expect that τ ∈ θ3
obtained as the normalization of the singular plane octic
null. Indeed, τ is the Jacobian of the genus five curve C
{x6y2−4x4y2−2x3y3−2x4y+2x3y+4x2y2+3xy3+y4+4x2y+2xy2+x2−4xy−2y2−2x+1 = 0} .
Using Macaulay2, we can write the equations of C in the canonical embedding and check that
it is contained in a quadric of rank 3, so it has a vanishing theta null. To compute τ from
C, we use the package [BSZ] in Sage [The19].
References
[AC19]
[Acc83]
Daniele Agostini and Lynn Chua, Numerical Schottky geometry in genus five, to
appear.
Robert D. M. Accola, On defining equations for the Jacobian locus in genus five,
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 89 (1983), no. 3, 445 -- 448.
[ACG11] Enrico Arbarello, Maurizio Cornalba, and Phillip A. Griffiths, Geometry of alge-
braic curves. Vol. II, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 268,
Springer, Heidelberg, 2011, With a contribution by Joseph D. Harris.
15
[ACGH85] Enrico Arbarello, Maurizio Cornalba, Phillip A. Griffiths, and Joseph Harris,
Geometry of algebraic curves. Vol. I, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wis-
senschaften, vol. 267, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985.
[ACM19] Robert Auffarth, Giulio Codogni, and Riccardo Salvati Manni, The Gauss map
and secants of the Kummer variety, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. (2019).
[AM67]
Aldo Andreotti and Alan L. Mayer, On period relations for abelian integrals
on algebraic curves, Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa - Classe di
Scienze Ser. 3, 21 (1967), 189 -- 238.
[AMSV93] Malcolm Adams, Clint McCrory, Ted Shifrin, and Robert Varley, Invariants of
Gauss maps of theta divisors, Differential geometry: geometry in mathematical
physics and related topics (Los Angeles, CA, 1990), Proc. Sympos. Pure Math.,
vol. 54, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1993, pp. 1 -- 8.
[And58]
Aldo Andreotti, On a Theorem of Torelli, Amer. J. Math. 80 (1958), 801.
[Bea77]
[BL04]
Arnaud Beauville, Prym varieties and the Schottky problem, Invent. Math. 41
(1977), no. 2, 149 -- 196.
Christina Birkenhake and Herbert Lange, Complex abelian varieties, second
ed., Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 302, Springer-Verlag,
Berlin, 2004.
[BSZ]
Nils Bruin, Jeroen Sijsling, and Alexandre Zotine, Riemann matrices and endo-
morphism rings of algebraic Riemann surfaces.
[CGS17] Giulio Codogni, Samuel Grushevsky, and Edoardo Sernesi, The degree of the
Gauss map of the theta divisor, Algebra Number Theory 11 (2017), no. 4, 983 --
1001.
[CKS18]
Lynn Chua, Mario Kummer, and Bernd Sturmfels, Schottky algorithms: Classical
meets tropical, Math. Comp. (2018).
[Cor89]
[Deb92]
[DJ10]
Maurizio Cornalba, Moduli of curves and theta-characteristics, Lectures on Rie-
mann Surfaces, World Scientific, 1989, pp. 560 -- 589.
Olivier Debarre, Le lieu des vari´et´es ab´eliennes dont le diviseur theta est singulier
a deux composantes, Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. (4) 25 (1992), no. 6, 687 -- 707.
Robin De Jong, Theta functions on the theta divisor, Rocky Mountain J. Math.
40 (2010), no. 1, 155 -- 176.
[FGMV14] Gavril Farkas, Samuel Grushevsky, Riccardo Salvati Manni, and Alessandro
Verra, Singularities of theta divisors and the geometry of A5, J. Eur. Math. Soc.
16 (2014), 1817 -- 1848.
16
[FGS17]
Hershel Farkas, Samuel Grushevsky, and Riccardo Salvati Manni, An explicit
solution to the weak Schottky problem, arXiv e-prints (2017).
[FM17]
[GM07]
[GM08]
[Gru12]
[GS]
[Igu67]
Eberhard Freitag and Riccardo Salvati Manni, The Gopel variety, Experiment.
Math. (2017), 1 -- 8.
Samuel Grushevsky and Riccardo Salvati Manni, Singularities of the theta divisor
at points of order two, Int. Math. Res. Not. (2007), no. 15.
Samuel Grushevsky and Riccardo Salvati Manni, Jacobians with a vanishing
theta-null in genus 4, Israel J. Math. 164 (2008), no. 1, 303 -- 315.
Samuel Grushevsky, The Schottky problem, Current developments in algebraic
geometry, MSRI Publications, vol. 59, Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Daniel Grayson and Michael Stilmann, Macaulay2, a software system for research
in algebraic geometry, available at http://www.math.uiuc.edu/Macaulay2/.
Jun-ichi Igusa, A desingularization problem in the theory of Siegel modular func-
tions, Math. Ann. 168 (1967), 228 -- 260.
[Igu72]
, Theta functions, Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1972, Die
Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 194.
[Igu81]
,
Schottky's
forms, E. B. Christoffel
(Aachen/Monschau, 1979), Birkhauser, Basel-Boston, Mass., 1981, pp. 352 -- 362.
invariant and quadratic
[Kem73] George Kempf, On the geometry of a theorem of Riemann, Ann. of Math. (2) 98
(1973), 178 -- 185.
[Kra15]
Thomas Kramer, Cubic threefolds, Fano surfaces and the monodromy of the
Gauss map, Manuscripta Mathematica 149 (2015), 303 -- 314.
[Mum83] David Mumford, On the Kodaira dimension of the Siegel modular variety, Lecture
Notes in Mathematics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1983, pp. 348 -- 375.
[Roh14]
[RSS14]
Herman Rohrbach, The Geometry of the Gauss Map and Moduli of Abelian Va-
rieties, Master's thesis, Universiteit Leiden, 2014.
Qingchun Ren, Steven V. Sam, and Bernd Sturmfels, Tropicalization of Classical
Moduli Spaces, Mathematics in Computer Science 8 (2014), no. 2, 119 -- 145.
[RSSS13] Qingchun Ren, Steven V. Sam, Gus Schrader, and Bernd Sturmfels, The Univer-
sal Kummer Threefold, Experiment. Math. 22 (2013), no. 3, 327 -- 362.
[Sch88]
Friedrich Schottky, Zur Theorie der Abelschen Functionen von vier Variabeln, J.
Reine Angew. Math. 102 (1888), 304 -- 352.
17
[The19]
[TiB88]
The Sage Developers, Sagemath, the Sage Mathematics Software System (Ver-
sion 8.6), https://www.sagemath.org, 2019.
Montserrat Teixidor i Bigas, The divisor of curves with a vanishing theta-null,
Compositio Math. 66 (1988), 15 -- 22.
18
|
1310.5981 | 1 | 1310 | 2013-10-22T16:52:24 | Stable maps to rational curves and the relative Jacobian | [
"math.AG"
] | We consider two cycles on the moduli space of compact type curves and prove that they coincide. The first is defined by pushing forward the virtual fundamental classes of spaces of relative stable maps to an unparameterized rational curve, while the second is obtained as the intersection of the Abel section of the universal Jacobian with the zero section. Our comparison extends results of Cavalieri-Marcus-Wise where the same identity was proved over on the locus of rational tails curves. | math.AG | math |
STABLE MAPS TO RATIONAL CURVES AND THE RELATIVE
JACOBIAN
STEFFEN MARCUS AND JONATHAN WISE
Abstract. We consider two cycles on the moduli space of compact type curves
and prove that they coincide. The first is defined by pushing forward the
virtual fundamental classes of spaces of relative stable maps to an unparame-
terized rational curve, while the second is obtained as the intersection of the
Abel section of the universal Jacobian with the zero section. Our comparison
extends results of [CMW12] where the same identity was proved over on the
locus of rational tails curves.
1. Introduction
Let M (P/BGm) denote the moduli space of relative stable maps to a "rubber"
target -- that is, to a chain of unparameterized rational curves with marked points
0 and ∞ on the end components -- and [M (P/BGm)]vir its virtual fundamental
class. Write M for the stack parameterizing stable marked curves equipped with
a neutral integral weighting, by which we mean a weighting of its marked points
by a vector of integers x of sum zero. Denote by M ct and M rt respectively the
loci of compact type curves and rational tails curves in M . We employ the same
decorations to refer to the appropriate substacks of M (P/BGm).
Our goal is to compare two natural cycles on M ct. One one hand, there is
a morphism Π : M ct(P/BGm) → M ct through which we can push forward the
virtual fundamental class. It is defined by sending a stable map to the Deligne --
Mumford stabilization of its source curve. On the other hand, we have a canonical
section of the relative Jacobian of the universal curve over M ct, given generically
by σ : (C, {pi}) 7→ Pi xi[pi], and we may take the intersection of the image of
this section and the zero section to obtain a cycle class DR. We write DR for
the scheme theoretic intersection, on which DR is supported. These cycles have
gone -- somewhat inconsistently -- by various names in the literature, including the
double Hurwitz class and the double ramification cycle.
In [CMW12], we showed that these two classes agree over the rational tails locus.
Here we will extend this result to compact type curves:
Theorem.
Π∗[M ct(P/BGm)]vir = DR.
The moduli space M (P/BGm) carries discrete invariants given by the genus g of
the source curve and the n marked pre-images of 0 and ∞ along with their weights,
encoded in a vector x. Fixing g and x distinguishes a component M g(P/BGm; x)
parameterizing stable maps to an unparameterized rational curve relative to two
marked points, with ramification profiles prescribed by the positive and negative
Date: September 25, 2018.
1
2
STEFFEN MARCUS AND JONATHAN WISE
parts of x respectively. This gives a compactification of the space of Hurwitz
covers associated to the same data, and admits a branch divisor morphism, the
degree of which is the double Hurwitz number Hg(x). Double Hurwitz numbers
are piecewise polynomials, controlled by a rich combinatorial structure described
in [GJV05, SSV08, CJM11]. The cycle Π∗[M g(P/BGm; x)]vir was introduced
in [GV03, GJV11] as a geometric tool by which to analyze the relationship be-
tween double Hurwitz numbers and the geometry of M g,n. It was shown in [FP05]
to be tautological. Most recently, Buryak -- Shadrin -- Spitz -- Zvonkine [BSSZ12] have
computed the intersection numbers of any monomial of psi classes against this cycle.
Independently, Eliashberg has sought a better understanding of the double ram-
ification cycle for use in symplectic field theory [EGH00]. This has led various
authors to the construction of DRg,n described above via intersections on the
relative Jacobian. Techniques of Hain [Hai11] and, independently, Grushevsky --
Zakharov [GZ12a], provide a remarkable computation as a polynomial of degree
2g in the xi with coefficients in the tautological ring. The limitations inherent in
using the relative Jacobian, however, restrict DRg,n to the compact type locus.
Recent advances of Grushevsky -- Zakharov [GZ12b] have extended this slightly. We
hope to compare these parallel approaches to the double ramification cycle on their
common domain of definition; the present theorem provides this comparison up to
compact type.
We happily acknowledge some very helpful comments and suggestions of R.
Pandharipande and D. Zvonkine, not least their encouragement that we return
to this question.
2. Rubber targets
In this section we briefly outline the construction of the universal family of
expansions for stable maps to rubber targets.
2.1. The rubber rational curve. Let P = [P1/Gm] where Gm acts on P1
by scaling the first coordinate. We can also realize P as the complement of the
closed point in A 2, where A = [A1/Gm]. Each of P, A and P1 have modular
interpretations:
• A is the moduli space of pairs (L, s) where L is a line bundle and s is a
section of L;
• P1 is the moduli space of triples (L, s, t) where s and t are sections of the
line bundle L that do not vanish simultaneously;
• P is the moduli space of tuples (L, s, M, t) where L and M are line bundles
and s and t are, respectively, sections of L and M that do not vanish
simultaneously.
We write L and M for the universal line bundles over P. The vanishing loci of s
and t are divisors on P, which we denote D− and D+.
The quotient map P1 → P realizes P1 as a Gm-torsor over P.
Proposition 2.1. Over P, the Gm-torsors P1 and Isom(L , M ) are isomorphic.
Proof. Recall that Gm acts on a point (L, s, t) of P1 by scaling s. We have the
map
P1 → P : (L, s, t) 7→ (L, s, L, t).
STABLE MAPS TO RATIONAL CURVES AND THE RELATIVE JACOBIAN
3
An object of Isom(L , M ) is a tuple (L, s, M, t, ϕ) where (L, s, M, t) ∈ P and
ϕ : L → M is an isomorphism of line bundles, and Gm acts by scaling ϕ. We have
a P-morphism
P1 → Isom(L , M ) : (L, s, t) 7→ (L, s, L, t, idL).
The action of λ ∈ Gm gives
λ.(L, s, L, t, idL) = (L, s, L, t, λidL) ≃ (L, λs, L, t, idL)
where the isomorphism is scaling the first copy of L by λ−1. This exhibits our
desired isomorphism.
(cid:3)
The Gm-torsor Isom(L , M ) has an associated line bundle
Hom(L , M ) = OP(D+ − D−),
giving a map P → BGm whose fiber is P1. More generally, if S → BGm is
a morphism classifying a line bundle L over S, then the pullback of P is the
projective completion of the line bundle L.
2.2. Expansions. An expansion of P is a chain
(1)
fP = P ∐
D−≃D+
P ∐
D−≃D+
· · · ∐
D−≃D+
P.
The isomorphism D− ≃ D+ used for gluing is the canonical one by which ND−/P
corresponds to N ∨
curves
D+/P. An expansion fP has an associated chain of rational
eP = P1 ∐
∞≃0
P1 ∐
∞≃0
· · · ∐
∞≃0
P1 ∈ Mss
0,2
with a quotient map eP → fP. There is a universal flat family of expansions of P
(see [ACFW, Section 4]). We use P exp for the total space of the universal family
and V for its base. This space is closely related to the universal family of chains of
rational curves: there is a canonical isomorphism Mss
0,2 ≃ V × BGm.
There is an ´etale cover of V by stacks A n (see [ACFW, Section 8.3]). The expan-
sion of P inducing the map A n → V is the locally closed substack Un ⊂ A 2n+2,
with coordinates (σ0, σ1, . . . , σn, τ1, . . . , τn, τn+1) defined by the non-vanishing of
the pair (σi, τj) for i < j and the vanishing of the product σiτj for i ≥ j.1 These co-
ordinates are taken using the modular description of A above, so each σi = (Li, si)
where Li is a line bundle and si is a section of Li, and similarly for τi = (Mi, ti).
The projection to the base is induced by restriction from
A 2n+2 → A n : (σ0, . . . , σn, τ1, . . . , τn+1) 7→ (σ1τ1, . . . , σnτn).
To a function2 [n] → [m] we may associate a map f : A n → A m where, if αi
denotes the i-th coordinate on A m or A n, we have
(2)
f ∗(αi) = Y
j∈f −1(αi)
αj
1We say that an object (L, s) of A vanishes if it is isomorphic to (O, 0).
2We use [n] to denote the set {1, . . . , n}.
4
STEFFEN MARCUS AND JONATHAN WISE
A morphism f : A n → A m commutes with the projections to V if and only if it
is associated as above to an order preserving injection:
A n
!❈❈❈❈❈❈❈❈
A m
}③③③③③③③③
V
These morphisms constitute a presentation of V (see loc. cit. for more details).
On the level of universal families, the map induced by f is given by the same
formula (2) with α replaced by σ or τ and the convention that u−1(0) = {0} and
u−1(m + 1) = {n + 1}.
of which there is exactly one -- together with compatibility data for each node. Let
2.3. The automorphism group of an expansion. Let fP be as in (1). An
automorphism of fP consists of maps P → P preserving the divisors D− and D+ --
E ⊂ fP be such a node, joining components fP ′ and fP ′′. To glue automorphisms
of fP ′ and fP ′′ along E , we must choose an isomorphism between the induced maps
(the identity) E → E . Since E ≃ BGm, this amounts to the selection of an element
of Gm. This proves the following lemma.
m.
These automorphisms, which are invisible on the underlying topological space of
Lemma 2.2. Let fP be an expansion of P as in (1) having n nodes. Then the
automorphism group of fP is isomorphic to Gn
fP, have sometimes been called ghost automorphisms.
by considering the functor of points of fP. An S-point of fP is
We may understand the ghost automorphisms in somewhat more concrete terms
(1) a system of n line bundles and sections (Li, si) and (Mi, ti), and
(2) isomorphisms (Li ⊗ Mi, si ⊗ ti) ≃ (OS, 0),
such that
(3) for all i the sections si and ti+1 do not vanish simultaneously.
The action of λ from the i-th factor in Gn
Li ⊗ Mi → OS.
m on these data is to scale the isomorphism
2.4. The universal family of chains of rational curves. Using the presentation
of V in Section 2.2, we will now describe the universal family of chains of rational
curves.
Note that projection to the coordinates (σ0, τn+1) gives a map A 2n+2 → A 2
whose restriction to Un factors through P. Since the coordinates σ0 and τn+1 are
fixed by the morphisms A n → A m in the diagram above, this map descends to
give a map P exp → P. We denote the pre-images of D− and D+ by D exp
− and
+ . When fP is an expansion of P, we write eD− and eD+ for the pre-images of
D exp
+ in fP. Also, there is an obvious map from P exp to BGm given by
− and D exp
D exp
pulling back the line bundle Hom(L , M ) on P.
We can construct a second map P exp → BGm determined by the line bundle
Q = Hom(L1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ Ln, M1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ Mn).
This line bundle descends to a line bundle on P and gives a map P → BGm. Let
Q be the associated Gm-torsor Isom(L1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ Ln, M1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ Mn). Note that Q
/
/
!
}
STABLE MAPS TO RATIONAL CURVES AND THE RELATIVE JACOBIAN
5
has degree zero on every component of every fiber of Un. The line bundle Q and
Gm-torsor Q should be regarded as the expansions to P exp of the line bundle and
Gm-torsor on P discussed in Section 2.1.
We analyze the total space of Q. For each 1 ≤ i ≤ n + 1 we have a projection
Un → P on to the i-th factor: (σ0, . . . , σn, τ1, . . . , τn+1) 7→ (σi−1, τi). This map
has a section sending P to the vanishing locus of σi and τi−1. In explicit terms,
the section sends (σ, τ ) to (σ0, . . . , σn, τ1, . . . , τn+1) with3
σj =
1
j < i − 1
σ j = i − 1
j > i − 1
0
τj =
0
τ
1
j < i
j = i
j > i
.
Restricting Q via this inclusion, we get a copy of Isom(L , M ) = P1 via the stan-
dard projection to P. Then Q is a flat family over A n whose fibers are chains of
rational curves and the family Q → Mss
0,2 = V × BGm is the universal family of
chains of rational curves.
2.5. Lifting maps to rubber targets. Let C → S be a pre-stable curve, and
suppose we have a stable map C → fP to an expansion of P. These data determine
a diagram of solid lines
(3)
=③
eP
fP
③
③
③
③
C
π
S
/❴❴❴
BGm.
Here, eP is the associated expansion of P1, i.e., the restriction of Gm-torsor Q to
fP. Note, however, that the map fP → BGm is the restriction of our map P exp →
BGm determined by the line bundle Q, thus again represents the restriction of
Q. Hence the obstruction to completing the top triangle is precisely the same as
the obstruction to completing the bottom square: it is the class in R1π∗O∗
C of the
restriction of the torsor Q to C.
Note furthermore that the restriction of Q to C induces a section of the relative
Picard stack P of C/S. Giving a lift of diagram (3) amounts to factoring this
section through the zero locus of P.
3. Moduli spaces
In this section we describe the two moduli spaces of stable maps in question.
They fit naturally into a cartesian diagram with the universal relative Jacobian
and its zero section, diagram (6) below.
3For notational simplicity, we write 0 and 1, respectively, for the trivial line bundle with section
0 or 1.
/
/
=
/
6
STEFFEN MARCUS AND JONATHAN WISE
3.1. Stable maps to rubber targets. Let M (P/BGm) be the stack of rubber
maps to chains of rational curves. An object over a scheme S is a commutative
diagram
(4)
in which
C
S
f
P exp
/ V × BGm
R1 C is a pre-stable curve over S,
R2 f is predeformable, and
R3 the automorphism group of all the data is finite.
Let M (P) be the stack of diagrams
(5)
C
S
P exp
/ V
with the same conditions as well as the following:4
R4 Let Q be the line bundle defined in Section 2. Then f ∗Q has degree zero
on every irreducible component of every fiber of C.
Note that R4 holds automatically on M (P/BGm).
Lemma 3.1. Given a predeformable diagram (5) the locus in S where the diagram
satisfies R4 is open.
Proof. By local finite presentation, we may assume S is of finite type. We argue
that the locus in question is constructible and stable under generization.
We may stratify S into locally closed subsets on which the dual graphs of C and
of P are constant. Then the degree of f ∗Q on each irreducible component of C is
a locally constant function on each stratum, thus a constructible function on S.
Now consider a geometric point s of S that is a specialization of η. Let C ′ be
the closure of an irreducible component of the generic fiber. Then the degree of
f ∗Q on C ′
η is the sum of the degrees of f ∗Q on the irreducible components of C ′
s,
hence is zero.
(cid:3)
Note that if we use the notation M( · · · ) to refer to the stacks obtained by
omitting the finiteness requirement R3 on automorphism groups, then we have an
obvious map
M(P/BGm) → M(P)
by forgetting the map S → BGm. In fact, the following lemma shows that this
map carries stable objects to stable objects, so provides us with a map
M (P/BGm) → M (P).
4This condition was incorrectly omitted in [CMW12].
/
/
/
/
/
/
STABLE MAPS TO RATIONAL CURVES AND THE RELATIVE JACOBIAN
7
3.2. Infinitesimal automorphisms. In this section, we will study the infinites-
imal automorphism group of a predeformable map f : C → fP. By definition, an
automorphism of such a map is a commutative diagram
C
f
C
f
fP
/ fP.
of infinitesimal automorphisms is from unstable components of C that are con-
tracted by f . As these are easy to understand, we will be more interested in the
We shall assume that (C, fP, f ) satisfies R1, R2, and R4. One obvious source
automorphisms of (C, fP, f ) that restrict to nontrivial automorphisms of fP.
Recall from Sections 2.2 and 2.3 that the map f is specified by 2n+2 line bundles
and sections
(L0, s0), . . . , (Ln, sn), (M1, t1), . . . , (Mn+1, tn+1)
as well as isomorphisms ϕi
conditions:
: Li ⊗ Mi
∼−→ OC for all i, satisfying the following
(1) si and tj do not vanish simultaneously for i < j,
(2) si ⊗ ti = 0 for all i,
(3) si and ti do not vanish identically on any irreducible component of C, and
(4) the orders of vanishing of ti and si are the same on opposite sites of a node
of C.
are predeformability, which says in particular that no irreducible component of C
The first two conditions come from the functor of points of fP; the last two come
is carried by f into a node of fP (namely, the vanishing locus of si and ti).
Furthermore, recall that the automorphism group of fP is Gn
of fP, consider the infinitesimal automorphisms of the triple (C, fP, f ) restricting
to λ on fP. To give such an automorphism, we must give an automorphism σ of C
m with the i-th factor
acting by scaling ϕi. For a fixed infinitesimal automorphism λ = (λ1, . . . , λn) ∈ Gn
m
and isomorphisms
such that the diagrams
ui : σ∗(Li, si) ∼−→ (Li, si)
vi : σ∗(Mi, ti) ∼−→ (Mi, ti)
σ∗Li ⊗ σ∗Mi
σ∗ϕi /
O
ui ⊗ vi
Li ⊗ Mi
λiϕi
/ O
commute for all i. It follows from R2 and R4 that none of the si vanish identically
on C. Therefore the maps ui are uniquely determined from σ, provided they exist.
The same applies to the vi.
Consider an irreducible component D of C. If D is not semistable then σ acts
trivially on D, in which case we set µD = 1. Otherwise σ acts by scaling and we
set µD equal to the scaling factor. If i is the unique index such that si and ti+1
do not vanish identically on D then σ∗(Li, si) ≃ (Li, µrD
D si) and σ∗(Mi+1, ti+1) ≃
(Mi+1, µ−rD
D ti+1), where rD is the common order of vanishing of both si and ti+1
/
/
/
/
/
8
STEFFEN MARCUS AND JONATHAN WISE
on D. It follows that µrD
D must be the same for all irreducible components D of
C with the same image in fP. We may therefore introduce the notation µi for the
D on all irreducible components on which si vanishes but does
common value of µrD
not vanish identically.
The map σ∗ϕi ◦ (ui ⊗ vi)−1 : Li ⊗ Mi → O is µiµ−1
i−1ϕi. We therefore get the
i−1 = λi. The µi therefore determine the λi, and, except for the
equation µiµ−1
geometric constraints from C already described, the µi may be arbitrary.
We may finally conclude:
Lemma 3.2. Let f : C → fP be a predeformable morphism from a connected,
nodal curve to an expansion fP of P. Assume that f satisfies R2 and R4. Then
(C, fP, f ) has an infinite automorphism group if and only if either
(1) there is an irreducible component of C that is contracted by f and has genus
g with n special points and 2g − 2 + n ≤ 0, or
(2) there is an irreducible component of fP whose pre-image in C consists en-
tirely of semistable components.
Corollary 3.2.1. A point of M(P/BGm) is satisfies R3 if and only if its image
in M(P) does.
3.3. The cartesian diagram. Let M be the Artin stack of Deligne-Mumford pre-
stable curves. The moduli spaces M (P/BGm) and M (P) live naturally over M
by forgetting all but the source curve of a stable map. Denote by J the universal
Jacobian over M and Z the image of its zero section, which is of course isomorphic
to M.
It is immediate from the definitions that the obstruction to lifting an S-point
of M (P) to an S-point of M (P/BGm) is the map C → P exp → BGm: this
composition factors through S if and only if a lift exists (see Section 2.5). We
therefore have a cartesian diagram
(6)
M (P/BGm)
Z
M (P)
/ J.
Note that the map M (P) → J takes values in J and not merely the universal
Picard because of condition R4. Since Z is pulled back from the zero section of the
universal relative Jacobian over the moduli space of stable curves, we also obtain a
cartesian diagram
(7)
M (P/BGm)
M (P)
Z
/ J
where J is the universal relative Jacobian over M and Z ≃ M is the image of its
zero section.
3.4. Virtual classes.
/
/
/
/
/
/
STABLE MAPS TO RATIONAL CURVES AND THE RELATIVE JACOBIAN
9
Theorem ([CMW12, Proposition 3.5 and Corollary 4.10]). The following cycle
classes on M (P/BGm) coincide: (i) the virtual fundamental class, as studied
in [GV05], (ii) the relative virtual fundamental class over M (P), as defined in [CMW12],
and (iii) the Gysin pullback of the cycle Z ⊂ J in diagram (7).
We regret that even though the arguments of [CMW12, Section 4] are valid for
all nodal curves, some of the notation employed there was specific to the rational
tails case. We have adopted better notation here, and we have also abbreviated
some other symbols. To bring the notation of loc. cit. in line with the present paper,
the following substitutions should be made:
[CMW12]
this paper
fT
T 2
fP
M rel
V × BGm
V
P exp
M
With these substitutions, the proof goes through otherwise unchanged. Note that
V is not isomorphic to T 2 -- the latter parameterizes expansions of P with a dis-
tinguished component -- though there is an ´etale map T 2 → V .5
4. Proof of the main theorem
We now prove our comparison theorem over the compact type locus. There are
two steps. The first is the construction of a section M ct → J of the universal
relative Jacobian through which our map M (P) → J factors. The second step
is a pullback of diagram (6) via this factorization and an application of Costello's
theorem [Cos06, Theorem 5.0.1].
4.1. The Abel map. We recall the construction of the Abel map over M ct. Given
a curve C with neutral integral weights x we show that OC (P xipi) can be adjusted
by a sum of boundary divisors (of the universal compact type curve) to have de-
gree zero on every component of C. This yields a section of the universal relative
Jacobian of M ct.
Construction. Suppose that C is a stable curve of compact type and L a line
bundle on C. By twisting with boundary divisors, we construct from L a line
bundle that has degree zero on every component of C.
We proceed by induction on the number of components of C, always ensuring
that the union of the components of C on which L has nonzero degree is a subtree
T of the dual graph of C. If T is reduced to a single component of C then we are
done, since the total degree of L is zero; we can therefore assume that T has at
least two vertices.
Choose a leaf C0 of T , and let x be the node at which C0 is joined to the rest
of T . Since C is of compact type, there is a canonical line bundle M on C with
section s such that s vanishes exactly along the connected component of C r {x}
has degree −1, and M has degree zero on every
containing C0. Therefore M(cid:12)(cid:12)C0
5The use of T 2 instead of V was the technical mistake that limited us to rational tails in
[CMW12].
10
STEFFEN MARCUS AND JONATHAN WISE
component of T other than the one meeting C0. But if d = deg L(cid:12)(cid:12)C0
then M ⊗ d ⊗ L
has degree zero on every component in T ∪ {C0}. This completes the inductive
step.
This construction makes sense in an ´etale neighborhood of a point in the base of
a versal family of curves of compact type. Moreover, the line bundle constructed
this way is unique up to tensoring with a line bundle pulled back from the base.
Indeed, suppose we had found two line bundles L1 and L2 by proceeding as above in
different orders through the components of C. Then L1 ⊗ L∨
2 is a sum of boundary
components in C that has degree zero on every component of the central fiber of C.
It is now easy to see that L1 ⊗ L∨
2 must be pulled back from the base. Indeed, all
boundary divisors of C appearing in L1 ⊗ L∨
2 must occur with the same multiplicity.
4.2. Comparison of classes. Given C in M ct with neutral integral weights x of
its markings, the construction described above gives a line bundle L that differs
component. This determines a section of the universal Jacobian over M ct.
from OC (P xipi) by a sum of boundary components and has degree zero on every
Consider the map M ct(P) → M ct sending a map f : C → fP to the stabiliza-
tion of C, marked with D = f −1(D exp
− ) and corresponding weights
according to the multiplicity of the divisors. By composition with the construction
above, we obtain a map
+ ) − f −1(D exp
M ct(P) → M ct → J.
On the other hand, the map C → P exp → BGm (the latter map given by the
torsor Q) gives another map M (P) → J. But recall that the line bundle Q on P
was constructed by adding a sum of boundary divisors to D exp
− . Therefore
f ∗Q differs from D by a sum of boundary divisors and the two maps C → BGm
must coincide. We conclude that we have a cartesian diagram
+ − D exp
M ct(P/BGm)
DR
M ct(P)
/ M ct
Z
/ J
where DR = M ct ×J Z.
The bottom horizontal arrow on the left is birational by [CMW12, Proposi-
tion 3.4].6 We may now apply Costello's theorem [Cos06, Theorem 5.0.1] to com-
plete the proof.
References
[ACFW] Dan Abramovich, Charles Cadman, Barbara Fantechi, and Jonathan Wise, Expanded
degenerations and pairs.
[BSSZ12] A. Buryak, S. Shadrin, L. Spitz, and D. Zvonkine, Integrals of psi-classes over double
ramification cycles.
[CJM11] Renzo Cavalieri, Paul Johnson, and Hannah Markwig, Wall crossings for double Hur-
witz numbers, Adv. Math. 228 (2011), no. 4, 1894 -- 1937. MR 2836109
[CMW12] Renzo Cavalieri, Steffen Marcus, and Jonathan Wise, Polynomial families of tautolog-
g,n, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 216 (2012), no. 4, 950 -- 981. MR 2864866
ical classes on M rt
(2012j:14019)
6The reader who would prefer not to rely on orbifold stable maps here may replace them with
logarithmic stable maps in the argument of loc. cit.
/
/
/
/
/
/
STABLE MAPS TO RATIONAL CURVES AND THE RELATIVE JACOBIAN
11
[Cos06] Kevin Costello, Higher genus Gromov-Witten invariants as genus zero invariants of
symmetric products, Ann. of Math. (2) 164 (2006), no. 2, 561 -- 601. MR 2247968
(2007i:14057)
[EGH00] Y. Eliashberg, A. Givental, and H. Hofer, Introduction to symplectic field theory, Geo-
[FP05]
[GJV05]
[GJV11]
[GV03]
[GV05]
[GZ12a]
metric and Functional Analysis (2000), no. Special Volume, Part II, 560 -- 673.
C. Faber and R. Pandharipande, Relative maps and tautological classes, J. Eur. Math.
Soc. (JEMS) 7 (2005), no. 1, 13 -- 49. MR MR2120989 (2005m:14046)
I. P. Goulden, D. M. Jackson, and R. Vakil, Towards the geometry of double Hurwitz
numbers, Adv. Math. 198 (2005), no. 1, 43 -- 92. MR 2183250 (2006i:14023)
, The moduli space of curves, double Hurwitz numbers, and Faber's intersection
number conjecture, Ann. Comb. 15 (2011), no. 3, 381 -- 436. MR 2836449 (2012h:14129)
Tom Graber and Ravi Vakil, Hodge integrals and Hurwitz numbers via virtual localiza-
tion, Compositio Math. 135 (2003), no. 1, 25 -- 36. MR MR1955162 (2004c:14108)
, Relative virtual localization and vanishing of tautological classes on moduli
spaces of curves, Duke Math. J. 130 (2005), no. 1, 1 -- 37. MR 2176546 (2006j:14035)
Samuel Grushevsky and Dmitry Zakharov, The double ramification cycle and the theta
divisor.
[GZ12b]
, The zero section of the universal semiabelian variety, and the double ramifi-
[Hai11]
[SSV08]
cation cycle.
R. Hain, Normal functions and the geometry of moduli spaces of curves, Handbook of
Moduli (Gavril Farkas and Ian Morrison, editors), arXiv:1102.4031, 2011.
S. Shadrin, M. Shapiro, and A. Vainshtein, Chamber behavior of double Hurwitz num-
bers in genus 0, Adv. Math. 217 (2008), no. 1, 79 -- 96. MR 2357323 (2008g:14044)
|
0912.2073 | 3 | 0912 | 2010-05-29T20:17:46 | Hypersurfaces and the Weil conjectures | [
"math.AG",
"math.NT"
] | We give a proof that the Riemann hypothesis for hypersurfaces over finite fields implies the result for all smooth proper varieties, by a deformation argument which does not use the theory of Lefschetz pencils or the l-adic Fourier transform. | math.AG | math |
Hypersurfaces and the Weil conjectures
A J Scholl
May 30, 2018
Abstract
We give a proof that the Riemann hypothesis for hypersurfaces over finite
fields implies the result for all smooth proper varieties, by a deformation
argument which does not use the theory of Lefschetz pencils or the ℓ-adic
Fourier transform.
Introduction
Suppose that X ⊂ Pd+1 is a smooth geometrically irreducible hypersurface
over a finite field Fq. It is well-known [6, 9] that in this case the Riemann
hypothesis for the zeta function of X is equivalent to the point-counting esti-
mate: (cid:12)(cid:12)#X(Fqn) − #Pd(Fqn)(cid:12)(cid:12) = O(qnd/2). It would therefore be extremely
interesting to have an "elementary" proof of this Diophantine estimate (see
for example [9, p.299]), in the spirit of Stepanov's method for curves [2, 14].
We hasten to say that we have no idea how to do this. What we show in
this paper is a curious, albeit entirely useless, related result (Theorem 3.3
below): one can deduce the Riemann hypothesis for all proper smooth Fq-
schemes from the Riemann hypothesis for smooth hypersurfaces, without
using monodromy of Lefschetz pencils or Fourier transform. It is tempting
to conclude from this that an elementary proof of the Riemann Hypothesis
for hypersurfaces is unlikely to exist.
The ingredients of the proof are: the existence of the Rapoport-Zink van-
ishing cycles spectral sequence, de Jong's alterations results, and Deligne's
theorem on the local monodromy of pure sheaves on curves [7, §1.8]. (It
is worth noting that the proof of the latter theorem, although ingenious, is
very short.) Of course the rules of the game do not permit the use of the
hard Lefschetz theorem or of any consequences of the theory of weights.
The idea of deforming to hypersurfaces comes from Ayoub's work on
the conservation conjecture for motives [1, Lemma 5.8]. An outline of the
proof is as follows. Suppose X is a smooth proper Fq-scheme of dimension
d. Then X is birational to a (generally singular) hypersurface X ′ ⊂ Pd+1.
1
Deform X ′ to a family of hypersurfaces H ⊂ Pd+1 × A1 whose general
member is smooth. Suppose there is a smooth connected curve T /Fq and
a finite morphism T → A1 such that the basechange of H to T has a
semistable model, f : E → T say. Then almost all closed fibres Et, t ∈ T
are smooth hypersurfaces, so they satisfy the Riemann hypothesis. Let
E ¯K be the geometric generic fibre of f . Then Deligne's local monodromy
theorem can be applied to the sheaves Rif∗Qℓ to show that at the points of
degeneration of f , the monodromy and weight filtrations on H i(E ⊗ ¯K, Qℓ)
agree.
By construction, there will be some degenerate fibre Et which is a normal
crossings divisor, and one of whose components admits a dominant rational
map to X. Some piece of the cohomology of X therefore contributes, via the
Rapoport-Zink spectral sequence, to H ∗(E ⊗ ¯K, Qℓ). Using the equality of
monodromy and weight filtrations, a calculation using the spectral sequence
then shows that the piece of H d(X ⊗ Fq, Qℓ) which does contribute is pure
of weight d, and that the remaining piece comes from varieties of lower
dimension, hence is pure by induction on dimension.
Since the existence of semi-stable models in finite characteristic is un-
known, to make a proof one has to work with alterations [3, 4] instead; while
complicating the details somewhat, this does not add any essential further
difficulty.
Acknowledgements. This paper was completed while the author was
visiting Fudan University, Shanghai, and I would like to thank Qingxue
Wang and the Mathematics Department for their hospitality. I also wish to
thank Luc Illusie and Qing Liu for helpful comments.
Notations and terminology: p and ℓ are prime numbers with ℓ 6= p. We
write F for an algebraic closure of Fp. If X is a scheme of finite type over
some separably closed field of characteristic different from ℓ, then H ∗(X)
denotes its ℓ-adic cohomology, and H ∗
c (X) its ℓ-adic cohomology with proper
support. A variety over an algebraically closed field k will mean an inte-
gral separated scheme of finite type over k. A morphism of varieties is an
alteration [3] if it is proper, dominant and generically finite.
1 Weights and monodromy
In this section we review basic and well-known facts concerning the Riemann
hypothesis and the weight-monodromy conjecture.
Let X/F be a scheme of finite type. Then X comes by basechange from
a scheme X0/Fq for some q = pr, and so H ∗(X) = H ∗(X0 × Spec F) carries
an action of Gal(F/Fq). Let Fq ∈ Gal(F/Fq) be the geometric Frobenius,
which is the inverse of the Frobenius substitution x 7→ xq. Recall that
a finite-dimensional Qℓ-representation V of Gal(F/Fq) is mixed of weights
≥ w (resp. mixed of weights ≤ w, pure of weight w) if for every eigenvalue
2
α ∈ Qℓ of Fq on V there exists an integer j ≥ 0 (resp. j ≤ 0, j = 0) such
that, for every isomorphism ι : Qℓ ∼−→ C, one has ια = q(w+j)/2. (This
implies in particular that α is algebraic.) The Riemann hypothesis for a
smooth proper F-scheme X is the statement:
RH(X): For all i ∈ [0, 2 dim X], H i(X) is pure of weight i.
Since a representation of Gal(F/Fq) is pure (or mixed) if and only if for
some r ≥ 1 its restriction to Gal(F/Fqr ) is (with the same weights), this
depends only on X, not on the model X0/Fq. For any d ∈ N let RH(d) be
the statement
RH(d): For all proper smooth X of dimension ≤ d, RH(X) holds.
The following reductions are completely standard arguments, but we include
the proofs just to be clear we are not smuggling in forbidden ingredients.
Lemma 1.1. Suppose RH(X) holds for all smooth projective F-varieties X
of dimension ≤ d. Then RH(d) holds.
Proof. Suppose X is a smooth proper F-scheme of dimension ≤ d. We
may assume X is irreducible. By [3, Thm. 4.1] there exists an alteration
f : X ′ → X where X ′ is a smooth and projective variety, inducing an injec-
tion f ∗ : H ∗(X) ֒−→ H ∗(X ′).
Lemma 1.2. Suppose X is smooth and projective of dimension d, and that
RH(d − 1) holds.
(i) If H d(X) is pure of weight d then RH(X) holds.
(ii) If X ′ is a variety birationally equivalent to X, then RH(X) holds if
and only if, for every i, H i
c(X ′) is mixed of weights ≤ i.
Proof. (i) Let Y ⊂ X be a smooth hyperplane section. Then if i < d,
by weak Lefschetz H i(X) injects into H i(Y ), which is pure of weight i by
hypothesis. Poincar´e duality then gives purity for H i(X) if i > d.
(ii) There exist nonempty open subschemes U ⊂ X, U ′ ⊂ X ′ with U ≃
U ′. Let Y = X \ U , Y ′ = X ′ \ U ′. Consider the long exact sequences of
cohomology with proper support
H i−1(Y ) −−−−→ H i
c(U ) −−−−→ H i(X) −−−−→ H i(Y )
≃y
H i−1
c
(Y ′) −−−−→ H i
c(Y ′)
By induction on dimension and RH(d− 1), we may assume that H i
H i(Y ) are mixed of weights ≤ i for every i. Therefore
c(X ′) −−−−→ H i
c(U ′) −−−−→ H i
c(Y ′) and
c(X ′) is mixed of weights ≤ i ⇐⇒ H i(X) is mixed of weights ≤ i.
H i
By Poincar´e duality this is equivalent to the condition: H 2d−i(X) is mixed
of weights ≥ 2d − i. Combining these for all i gives the result.
3
Lemma 1.3. Let X, X ′, be smooth projective varieties, and let f : X ′ → X
be an alteration. Let Γ ⊂ Aut(X ′) be a finite subgroup such that f factors
as X ′ → X ′/Γ
−→ X, where g is a radicial alteration. Assume RH(X)
and RH(d− 1). Then for every i, the invariant subspace H i(X ′)Γ is pure of
weight i.
Proof. There exists a nonempty open Γ-invariant subscheme U ′ ⊂ X ′ such
that U ′ → U ′/Γ is ´etale and g : U ′/Γ → U = f (U ′) is finite, flat and
radicial. Then H i
c(U ) is mixed of weights ≤ i by
Lemma 1.2(ii). The obvious equivariant generalisation of 1.2(ii) then implies
that H i(X ′)Γ is pure of weight i.
c(U ′)Γ, and H i
g
c(U ) ≃ H i
Lemma 1.4. Let X, X ′ be smooth projective varieties of dimension d, let
Γ be a finite group acting on X ′, and let f : X ′/Γ −−→ X be a dominant
rational map. Assume RH(d − 1) holds. Then if H d(X ′)Γ is pure of weight
d, RH(X) holds.
Proof. One can find a Γ-invariant nonempty open subscheme U ′ ⊂ X ′ and
an open subscheme U ⊂ X such that f induces a finite flat morphism U ′ →
c (U ′)Γ. Then one can reverse the argument
U , and then f ∗ : H ∗
of the previous lemma.
c (U ) ֒−→ H ∗
Now let R be a Henselian discrete valuation ring, with finite residue field
of characteristic p, and field of fractions K. Let GK denote the absolute
Galois group of K and IK its inertia subgroup. Let tℓ : IK → Zℓ(1) be the
tame Kummer character, given by
for any uniformiser π of R.
tℓ(σ) =(cid:16) ℓn√π
σ−1(cid:17)n∈N
Let ρ : GK → Aut(V ) be a continuous finite-dimensional Qℓ-representation.
Then one knows that there exists a finite extension K ′/K such that ρ(IK ′) is
unipotent. Moreover the restriction of ρ to IK ′ factors as χ◦ tℓ for some ho-
momorphism χ : Zℓ(1) → GL(V ). One defines the logarithm of monodromy
to be N = log(χ) : V → V (−1), which can be regarded as a nilpotent en-
domorphism of V , with twisted Galois action. There is then an associated
monodromy filtration (Mn)n∈Z on V , exhaustive and separated, which is
uniquely characterised by the properties:
• N (Mn(V )) ⊂ Mn−2(V )(−1)
• For every j ∈ N, N j induces an isomorphism grM
−j(V )(−j).
The monodromy filtration is stable under GK , and the action of IK ′ on
∗ (V ) is trivial. Write q for the order of the residue field of K ′, so that
grM
Gal(F/Fq) acts on grM
∗ (V ). Say that V is monodromy-pure of weight w ∈ Z
if for every n ∈ Z, grM
n (V ) is pure of weight n + w. Deligne's weight-
monodromy conjecture [5] is then the statement:
j (V ) ∼−→ grM
4
Weight-Monodromy Conjecture 1.5. Let X/K be smooth and proper.
Then for every i, H i(X ⊗ ¯K) is monodromy-pure of weight i.
Lemma 1.6. Let V be monodromy-pure of weight w, and let G• be a filtra-
tion on V by GK -invariant subspaces such that
(a) for all n ∈ Z, N (GnV ) ⊂ (Gn−2V )(−1);
(b) for every n 6= 0, grG
Then G• = M•.
n V is pure of weight w + n.
Proof. Note that (a) implies that IK acts on grG
• V by a finite quotient, so
(b) makes sense. By assumption, grM
n V is pure of weight w+n. Assumption
(b) therefore implies that on G−1V the filtrations induced by G• and M•
are equal, so that
n < 0 =⇒ grG
n V = grG
n G−1V = grM
n G−1V ⊂ grM
n V
(1.7)
Dually, on V /G0V the filtrations induced by G• and M• are equal, and
n > 0 =⇒ grM
n V −→−→ grM
n V /G0V = grG
n V /G0V = grG
n V.
(1.8)
Then for every j > 0 we have a commutative diagram
grM
j (V )
≃
N j
/ grM
−j(V )(−j)
grG
j (V )
N j
grG
−j(V )(−j)
j (V ) ∼−→ grG
and therefore N j : grG
monodromy filtration this implies G• = M•.
−j(V )(−j). By the uniqueness of the
We finally recall Deligne's theorem on the monodromy of pure sheaves
on curves. Let T /Fq be a smooth curve, U ⊂ T the complement of a closed
point t ∈ T . Let OT,t be the henselised local ring, K its field of fractions,
and ¯η : Spec ¯K → U the associated geometric point.
Theorem 1.9. [7, Thm 1.8.4] Let F be a lisse Qℓ-sheaf on U which is
punctually pure of weight w (i.e. for every closed point s ∈ U , F¯s is pure of
weight w). Then the representation F¯η of Gal( ¯K/K) is monodromy-pure of
weight w.
5
o
o
o
o
/
2 Vanishing cycles
We first review Rapoport-Zink's weight spectral sequence [11], which is the
ℓ-adic version of Steenbrink's spectral sequence in Hodge theory [13]. A
detailed account of all of this theory can be found in [8].
Let S be a regular scheme of dimension 1, and f : X → S a proper
morphism. Recall that f is strictly semistable if f is flat and generically
smooth, X is regular, and for each closed point s ∈ S the fibre Xs is a
reduced divisor with strict normal crossings (i.e., the irreducible components
of Xs are smooth over s and intersect transversally).
Let R be a Henselian DVR, and K its field of fractions. Assume that its
residue field k has characteristic different from ℓ. Let Y → Spec R be proper
and strictly semistable, with Y integral. Let d be the relative dimension of
f , and write Y = Y ⊗ ¯k for the geometric special fibre. Thus Y =S0≤i≤N Yi
where each Yi is smooth and proper, of dimension d. As usual we write
YI = \i∈I
Yhmi = GI=m+1
Yi,
YI ,
∅ 6= I ⊂ {0, . . . , N}
0 ≤ m ≤ d
(our numbering differs from that of Rapoport and Zink, for whom this would
be Yhm+1i). The scheme Yhmi, if nonempty, is proper and smooth of dimen-
sion d − m. For a, b, n ∈ Z set
nC a,b =(H n+2b(Yha−bi)(b)
0
if a ≥ 0 ≥ b
otherwise
Let
ρ = ρa,b,n : nC a,b → nC a+1,b
be the alternating sum of the restriction maps, and
γ = γa,b,n : nC a,b → nC a,b+1
the alternating sum of the Gysin maps. Then these maps make nC a,b into
a cohomological double complex; let (mC n, dC ) be the associated simple
complex. The Rapoport-Zink spectral sequence is a spectral sequence
Emn
1 = mC n =⇒ H ∗(Y ¯K).
There is a mapping N : E → E(−1) on the entire spectral sequence, given
in degree 1 by the tautological map (the identity map when both source and
target are nonzero)
N : nC a,b → n−2C a+1,b+1(−1)
6
Poincar´e duality induces isomorphisms (Em,n
and which on the abutment is the logarithm of monodromy operator. In
particular, the abutment filtration1 G• on E∗
∞ satisfies N (Gm) ⊂ Gm−2(−1).
(d) and (up
to sign) d−m,2d−n
)∨ ≃
1
E−m,2d−n
(d). (In fact the whole spectral sequence is compatible with Poincar´e
duality on the generic and special fibres, but we will not use this deeper fact
- see for example [12].)
)∨ ≃ E−m,2d−n
, hence also (Em,n
is the transpose of dm−r,n+r−1
2
1
1
1
2
For the rest of this section we assume that k = F. In this case, the Weil
conjectures for the varieties Yhmi imply that the spectral sequence degen-
erates at E2, and that its abutment filtration is the weight filtration. The
weight-monodromy conjecture for H i(YK) is then equivalent to the state-
ment: for every j ≥ 0 the map N j : E−j,i+j
∞ (−j) is an isomorphism.
Conversely, from the weight-monodromy conjecture one can deduce parts of
the Weil conjectures:
∞ → Ej,i−j
Proposition 2.1. Suppose that Y is projective over Spec R, and let Z ⊂ Y
be a hyperplane section in general position. Assume:
(a) RH(d − 1) holds;
(b) YK and ZK satisfy the weight-monodromy conjecture.
Then the Rapoport-Zink spectral sequence degenerates at E2, and RH(Yi)
holds for each component Yi of Y .
(By "hyperplane in general position", we mean one that meets each Yhmi
transversally.)
Proof. Assumption (a) and the proof of Lemma 1.2(i) imply that if (m, i) 6=
(0, d) then H i(Yhmi) is pure of weight i. Therefore Em,n
is pure of weight
n except possibly for (m, n) = (0, d), and so for every i 6= d the abutment
filtration on Ei
∞ equals the monodromy filtration shifted by i. Moreover, for
r ≥ 2 the only differentials which can possibly be non-zero are those with
source or target E0,d
, namely
1
r
E−r,d+r−1
2
= E−r,d+r−1
r
d−r,d+r−1
r−−−−−−→ E0,d
r
d0,d
r−−−−→ Er,d−r+1
r
= Er,d−r+1
2
(2.2)
We have Er,d−r−1
, since this group is not a source or target of
any of the differentials (2.2). Also, since the abutment and weight filtrations
on Ed−1
= Er,d−r−1
∞
2
∞ are equal, by hypothesis (b) the map
→ Er,d−r−1
N r : E−r,d+r−1
∞
∞
(−r).
is an isomorphism. So
dim Er,d−r−1
2
= dim Er,d−r−1
∞
= dim E−r,d+r−1
∞
≤ dim E−r,d+r−1
2
1The increasing filtration, normalised so that grn Ek
∞ = Ek−n,n
∞
.
7
with equality if and only if d−r,d+r−1
hence for each r ≥ 2, the differentials d−r,d+r−1
using 2.3(ii) shows that the differentials dd,0
spectral sequence degenerates at E2.
r
r
= 0. By 2.3(i) below we have equality,
vanish. The dual argument
also vanish. Therefore the
r
For the second assertion, it is enough to show that H d(Yh0i) is pure of
weight d. Consider V = H d(Y ¯K ). By hypothesis V satisfies the weight-
monodromy conjecture, hence N j : grW
−j(V )(−j) for every j ≥
0. The abutment filtration G• on V then satisfies the hypotheses of Lemma
1.6 with w = d, and so grG
0 (V ) =
E0,d
is the middle homology of the
complex
0 V is also pure of weight d. Therefore grG
is pure of weight d. Then since E0,d
j (V ) ∼−→ grW
2
2
Ma≥0
H d−2a−2(Yh2a+1i)(−a − 1) →Ma≥0
H d−2a(Yh2ai)(−a)
H d−2a+2(Yh2a−1i)(−a + 1)
→Ma≥1
by hypothesis (a) we see that H d(Yh0i) is also pure of weight d.
Lemma 2.3. (i) For every m > 0 the map
N m : E−m,d+m−1
2
→ Em,d−m−1
2
(−m)
is injective.
(ii) For every m > 0 the map
N m : E−m,d+m+1
2
→ Em,d−m+1
2
(−m).
is surjective.
r
Proof. The second assertion follows from the first by Poincar´e duality. Let
(Z Em,n
) be the Rapoport-Zink spectral sequence associated to Z. It degen-
erates at E2, since we are assuming the Weil conjectures in dimension < d.
In the commutative square:
E−m,d−1+m
2
αy
Z E−m,d−1+m
2
N m
−−−−→ Em,d−1−m
2
∼−−−−→N m
ZEm,d−1−m
2
y
the bottom map is an isomorphism by hypothesis (b). It is therefore enough
to show that the map α is an injection. But α is induced by the vertical
maps βj in the diagram
−−−−→ E−m,d−1+m
1
−−−−→ E−m+1,d−1+m
1
β0y
8
E−m−1,d−1+m
1
β−1y
Z E−m−1,d−1+m
1
−−−−→ Z E−m,d−1+m
1
−−−−→ Z E−m+1,d−1+m
1
β1y
We have for j = 0 or −1
=Ma≥0
E−m+j,d−1+m
1
H d−m−2a+2j−1(Yh2a+m−ji)(−a − m + j)
and dim Yh2a+m−ji = d − m − 2a + j, so by weak Lefschetz βj is an isomor-
phism for j = −1 and an injection for j = 0. Therefore α is an injection.
We need a variant of Proposition 2.1, in which we are given a finite sub-
group Γ ⊂ Aut(Y/R). Then Γ acts on the Rapoport-Zink spectral sequence,
and going through all the steps of the previous proof, one obtains:
Proposition 2.4. Let Y/R be projective and strictly semistable, and Γ ⊂
Aut(Y/R) a finite subgroup. Let Z ⊂ Y be a hyperplane section in general
position. Assume the following hold:
(a) RH(d − 1) holds.
(b) H ∗(Y ¯K)Γ and H ∗(Z ¯K ) satisfy the weight-monodromy conjecture.
Then the Γ-invariant part of the Rapoport-Zink spectral sequence for H ∗(Y ¯K)
degenerates at E2, and for every i, H i(Yh0i)Γ is pure of weight i.
3 Deformation to hypersurfaces
In this section we work over an algebraically closed field k (ultimately k = F),
and all morphisms will be k-morphisms.
Lemma 3.1. Let X be a smooth variety of dimension d. Then there exists:
• a projective strictly semistable morphism g : E → T , where T is a
smooth curve;
• a finite subgroup Γ ⊂ Aut(E/T );
• a nonempty open subscheme U ⊂ T and a family of smooth hypersur-
faces Z ⊂ Pd+1× U , together with a dominant U -morphism E ×T U →
Z, inducing a purely inseparable inclusion of function fields κ(Z) ⊂
κ(E)Γ;
• a point t ∈ T (k) and a dominant rational map from Et/Γ to X.
Proof. There exists a birational morphism p : X → H0 where H0 ⊂ Pn is
an integral hypersurface (in general singular). Choose a pencil f : H → P1
of hypersurfaces whose generic fibre is smooth, and with f −1(0) = H0. We
then apply the procedure of the last paragraph of the proof of [4, 5.13] to
9
f , taking the group G in loc. cit. to be trivial. This gives a commutative
diagram of varieties and dominant projective morphisms
E
y
H −−−−→f
g
−−−−→ T
π
y
P1
in which T is a smooth curve and E is regular. The unlabelled vertical
morphism is an alteration, and g (which is obtained by repeated blowups
from a "G′-pluri nodal fibration", in the terminology of loc. cit.) is strictly
semistable. Finally there is a finite group Γ (which is N in de Jong's nota-
tion) acting on E covering the trivial actions on H and T , such the extension
k(E)Γ/k(H ×P1 T ) is purely inseparable. We take U ⊂ T sufficiently small
such that Z = H ×P1 U is smooth over U . Finally, for any point t ∈ π−1(0)
we get a dominant rational map Et/Γ → H0 −−→ X.
Remark 3.2. Ayoub's lemma [1, Lemma 5.8] is similar but stronger, since
an alteration is not required in characteristic zero, as one may in that case
appeal to semi-stable reduction [10].
We now suppose that k = F.
F
. Then RH(d) holds.
Theorem 3.3. Assume that RH(d − 1) holds, and that RH(V ) holds for
every smooth hypersurface V ⊂ Pd+1
Proof. Let X/F be smooth and proper of dimension d. Choose E → T be
as in the lemma. Fix a projective embedding E ֒−→ PD × T , and choose a
hyperplane L ⊂ PD which meets Et in general position. Let W = E ∩ (L ×
−→ T be the hyperplane section given by L. Replacing T by an open
T )
subscheme contaning t, and E by its inverse image by f , we may assume
that for every s ∈ U = T −{t} the fibres Hπ(s), Es and Ws are smooth, and
that the morphism Es/Γ → Hπ(s) is the composition of a modification and
a radicial morphism. The sheaves
g
F i = Rif∗QℓU ,
Gi = Rig∗QℓU
and (F i)G are therefore lisse Qℓ-sheaves on U . Let R = OT,t, K = Frac(R)
and ¯η : Spec ¯K → U as in §1.
Proposition 3.4. H i(E¯η)Γ and H i(W¯η) are monodromy-pure of weight i.
Proof. Let s ∈ U be a closed point. By hypothesis RH(Ws) holds, and by
1.3 and the hypotheses, H i(Es)Γ is pure of weight i. Thus the sheaves (F i)Γ
and Gi are punctually pure of weight i, and Theorem 1.9 then implies that
H i(E¯η)Γ = (F i
¯η are monodromy-pure of weight i.
¯η)Γ and H i(W¯η) = Gi
10
Let Et be the normalisation of Et, and apply Proposition 2.4 with Y =
E ×T Spec R, Z = W ×T Spec R. We conclude that H i( Et)Γ is pure of
weight i. Now let X ′ ⊂ Et be any component that dominates X under the
rational map Et/Γ → X, and let ∆ ⊂ G be its stabiliser. Then H i(X ′)∆ ⊂
H i( Et)Γ. So H i(X ′)∆ is pure of weight i, and so by Lemma 1.4, the Riemann
hypothesis holds for X.
References
[1] J. Ayoub: The motivic vanishing cycles and the conservation conjec-
ture. Algebraic Cycles and Motives, Vol 1, 3–54, London Math. Soc.
Lecture Note Ser. 343, Cambridge Univ. Press. 2007
[2] E. Bombieri: Counting points on curves over finite fields (d'apr`es
Stepanov). S´eminaire Bourbaki exp. 430, 1973.
[3] A. J. De Jong: Smoothness, semi-stability and alterations. Publ. Math.
IHES 83 (1996), 51–93
[4] - : Families of curves and alterations Ann. Inst. Fourier, Grenoble
47, 2 (1997), 599–621
[5] P. Deligne: Th´eorie de Hodge I. Actes du Congr`es International des
Math´ematiciens (Nice, 1970), Tome 1, Gauthir–Villars, Paris (1971),
425–430
[6] P. Deligne: La conjecture de Weil I Publ. Math. IHES 43 (1974), 273–
307
[7] P. Deligne: La conjecture de Weil II Publ. Math. IHES 52 (1980),
137–252
[8] L. Illusie: Autour du th´eor`eme de monodromie locale. P´eriodes p-
adiques (Bures-sur-Yvette, 1988) Ast´erisque 223 (1994), 9–57
[9] N. M. Katz: An overview of Deligne's proof of the Riemann hypothesis
for varieties over finite fields. Proc. Symp. Pure Math. AMS 28 (1976),
275–305
[10] G. Kempff, F. Knutsen, D. Mumford, B. Saint-Donat: Toroidal embed-
dings I. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 339. Springer, Berlin 1973.
[11] M. Rapoport, T. Zink: Uber die lokale Zetafunktion von Shimurava-
rietaten. Monodromiefiltration und verschwindende Zyklen in ungle-
icher Charakteristik. Invent. Math. 68 (1982), 21–101
[12] T. Saito: Weight spectral sequences and independence of ℓ. Journal de
l'Institut de Math´ematiques de Jussieu 2 (4), (2003), 583–634
[13] J. Steenbrink: Limits of Hodge structures. Invent. Math. 21 (1076),
229–257
11
[14] S. A Stepanov: On the number of points of a hyperelliptic curve over
a finite prime field. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat. 33 (1969), 1103–
1114
Department of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics
Centre for Mathematical Sciences
Wilberforce Road
Cambridge CB3 0WB
England
[email protected]
12
|
1711.08258 | 2 | 1711 | 2018-08-17T11:12:05 | Combinatorial Aspects of Classical Resolution of Singularities | [
"math.AG"
] | We describe combinatorial aspects of classical resolution of singularities that are free of characteristic and can be applied to singular foliations and vector fields as well as to functions and varieties. In particular, we give a combinatorial version of Hironaka's maximal contact theory in terms of characteristic polyhedra systems and we show the global existence of maximal contact in this context. | math.AG | math |
Combinatorial Aspects of Classical Resolution of
Singularities
Beatriz Molina-Samper
To Professor Felipe Cano on the occasion of his 60th birthday
Abstract
We describe combinatorial aspects of classical resolution of singularities that are free
of characteristic and can be applied to singular foliations and vector fields as well as
to functions and varieties.
In particular, we give a combinatorial version of Hironaka's
maximal contact theory in terms of characteristic polyhedra systems and we show the
global existence of maximal contact in this context.
1 Introduction
We present here a combinatorial formulation for the procedure of reduction of singularities
in terms of polyhedra systems. This combinatorial structure is free of restrictions on the
characteristic and provides a combinatorial support for the reduction of singularities of varieties,
foliations, vector fields and differential forms, among other possible objects.
Hironaka's characteristic polyhedra represent the combinatorial steps in almost any proce-
dure of reduction of singularities. This is implicit in the formulation of the polyhedra game
[13], solved by Spivakovsky [20], and in many other papers about characteristic polyhedra
[6, 7, 19, 20, 21].
The combinatorial features concerning the problems of reduction of singularities are reflected
in polyhedra systems without loosing the global aspects. In particular, we need to project the
problem over a "Maximal Contact Support Fabric", that plays the role of a maximal contact
variety [1]. The proof of global existence of combinatorial maximal contact is also a problem
of the same nature as the reduction of singularities. We present here a proof and it is solved
thanks to the induction hypothesis on the dimension.
Let us remark that in positive characteristic maximal contact does not necessarily exist
[5, 8, 9, 16]. Nevertheless we do find it in the combinatorial situations.
The polyhedra systems have evident links with toric varieties and they also provide a combi-
natorial global support for the so-called Newton non-degenerated varieties [17]. In a forthcoming
paper we plan to develop these last two aspects also for codimension one singular foliations.
2 Support Fabrics for Polyhedra Systems
The support fabrics play the role of ambient spaces for supporting polyhedra systems. They
express the stratified structure of the space.
Let I be a non-empty finite set and denote by P(I) the set of subsets of I. We consider the
Zariski topology on P(I) whose closed sets are the sets K ⊂ P(I) having the property:
If J1 ∈ K and J2 ⊃ J1 ⇒ J2 ∈ K.
A subset H ⊂ P(I) is open if and only if for every J ∈ H we have P(J) ⊂ H. The closure of
{J} ⊂ P(I) is the set {J} = {J ′ ⊂ I; J ′ ⊃ J}.
1
A support fabric is a pair F = (I, H) where I is a finite set and H is an open set for the
Zariski topology on P(I). The elements of H are called strata and (I, ≤) is called the index
set. The dimension dim(F ) is defined by dim(F ) = max{#J; J ∈ H}, where #J denotes the
number of elements of J. Note that the strata J ∈ H where the dimension is reached are closed
points in H.
The first example is the local support fabric LI associated to the index set I, defined by
LI = (I, P(I)). We can obtain other ones as follows:
• The restriction FU of the support fabric F to an open set U ⊂ H.
It is given by
FU = (I, U). Note that we always have F = LI H.
• The reduction RedK(F ) of the support fabric F to a closed subset K of H, that is K is
the intersection with H of a closed set of P(I). We consider the smallest open set HK
that contains K. That is HK =SJ∈K P(J). Then, we define RedK(F ) = FHK.
• The projection F T from a non-empty stratum T ∈ H. The set
HT = {J \ T ; T ⊂ J, J ∈ H}
is open in P(I T ), where I T = I \ T . We define F T = (I T , HT ). Note that dim(F T ) <
dim(F ).
Given a support fabric F = (I, H), the relevant index set IF of F is defined by IF = ∪J∈HJ.
We say that two support fabrics F1 = (I1, H1) and F2 = (I2, H2) are equivalent if there is a
bijection φ : IF1 → IF2 such that H2 = {φ(J); J ∈ H1}. In this case we say that φ is an
equivalence between F1 and F2.
Let us define the blow-up πJ (F ) of F centered in a non-empty stratum J ∈ H. Take
I ′ = I ∪ {∞} where ∞ /∈ I. Define H′ = H′
s ∪ H′
∞ where H′
s = H \ {J} and
H′
∞ = [K∈{J}∩H
H′K
∞ ; where H
′K
∞ = {(K \ J) ∪ A ∪ {∞}; A ( J}.
We have that H′ is open in P(I ′) and we define πJ (F ) = (I ′, H′). Note that for every K ∈
′K
∞ → P(J) \ {J} given by J ′ 7→ AJ ′ , where AJ ′ is the unique
{J} ∩ H, there is a bijection H
subset of J such that
J ′ = (K \ J) ∪ AJ ′ ∪ {∞}.
Remark 1. The dimension of a support fabric F is invariant by blow-ups.
Remark 2. The relevant index sets after the blow-up πJ (F ) are given by
IπJ (F ) =(cid:26)
IF ∪ {∞},
IF \ {j} ∪ {∞},
if #J ≥ 2;
if J = {j}.
Moreover, if there is an equivalence φ between two support fabrics F1 and F2, then for every
J ∈ H1, the blow-ups πJ (F1) and πφ(J)(F2) are also equivalent.
There is a surjective map π#
J : H′ → H between the strata sets of πJ (F ) and F respectively,
given by π#
J (H′K
∞ ) = {K}, for each K ∈ {J} ∩ H and by π#
J (J ′) = J ′, if J ′ ∈ H′
s = H \ {J}.
Proposition 1. The map π#
J : H′ → H is continuous.
Proof. Remark that for every J ′ ∈ H′, we have π#
J(cid:16)P(J ′)(cid:17) ⊂ P(cid:16)π#
J (J ′)(cid:17).
(cid:4)
Corollary 1. Given an open set U ⊂ H, we have πJ (FU ) = πJ (F )U ′, where U ′ = (π#
J )−1(U).
Example 1. Consider a pair (M, E), where M is a complex analytic variety and E is a strong
normal crossings divisor of M . That is, E is the union of a finite family {Ei}i∈I of irreducible
smooth hypersurfaces Ei, where we fix an order in the index set I and the next properties hold:
2
1. Given a point p ∈ M and the subset Ip = {i ∈ I; p ∈ Ei}, there is part of a local
coordinate system in p of the form {xi}i∈Ip in such a way that Ei = (xi = 0) locally in p
for each i ∈ Ip (such coordinate systems are called adapted to E).
2. The non-singular closed analytic set EJ =Tj∈J Ej is connected for each J ⊂ I.
The pair FM,E = (I, H) is a support fabric, where H = {J ⊂ I; EJ 6= ∅}. Note that the
dimension of FM,E is not necessarily the dimension of M . Given J ∈ H, we can perform the
usual blow-up
π : (M ′, E′) → (M, E)
centered in EJ , where E′ is the total transform of E, that is, E′ = π−1(E). In this situation
we have πJ (F ) = FM ′,E′.
3 Polyhedra Systems
When we perform a blow-up of the ambient space, it becomes of global nature. Polyhedra
systems provide a way of giving Newton or characteristic polyhedra in a coherent way along
global ambient spaces, represented in our case by the support fabric.
3.1 Definitions.
Given a totally ordered finite set J, we recall that RJ denotes the set of maps σ : J → R. If
J1 ⊂ J2, there is a canonical projection prJ2,J1 : RJ2 → RJ1 given by σ 7→ σJ1
. For a subset
A ⊂ RJ
≥0, we define the positive convex hull [[A]] by
[[A]] = Convex hull(cid:16)A + RJ
≥0(cid:17) ⊂ RJ
≥0.
Let d ∈ Z>0 be a positive integer. We say that a subset ∆ ⊂ RJ
with denominator d if there is A ⊂ (1/d)ZJ
≥0 such that ∆ = [[A]].
≥0 is a characteristic polyhedron
Definition 1. A polyhedra system D over a support fabric F = (I, H) with denominator d,
is a triple D = (F ; {∆J }J∈H, d), where each ∆J ⊂ RJ
≥0 is a characteristic polyhedron with
denominator d, in such a way that for every J1, J2 ∈ H where J1 ⊂ J2, we have ∆J1 =
prJ2,J1(∆J2 ). When d = 1, we say that D is a Newton polyhedra system over F .
If it is
necessary, we denote by FD the support fabric of D. We define the dimension of D as the
dimension of FD.
We say that two polyhedra systems D1 and D2 are equivalent if there is an equivalence φ
J}J∈H1, d) and
J for all J ∈ H1, where D1 = (F1, {∆1
φ(J) = ∆1
between F1 and F2 such that ∆2
D2 = (F2, {∆2
J }J∈H2, d). We also say that φ is an equivalence between D1 and D2.
Given a polyhedra system D = (F , {∆J }J∈H, d), there is a Newton polyhedra system N (D)
associated to D, defined by
N (D) = (F ; {d∆J }J∈H, 1).
Conversely, given another positive integer number d′, we can obtain a new polyhedra system
D/d′ given by D/d′ =(cid:0)F ; {(1/d′)∆J }J∈H , dd′(cid:1) . In particular, we have N (D)/d = D.
Let us see some examples of polyhedra systems:
• Given a characteristic polyhedron ∆ ⊂ RI
≥0 with denominator d, we define the local
polyhedra system L(∆, d) by
L(∆, d) = (LI ; {∆J }J∈P(I), d), where ∆J = prIJ (∆).
• The restriction DU of D to an open set U ⊂ H is defined by
DU = (FU ; {∆J }J∈U , d).
3
• The reduction RedK(D) of D to a closed set K of H is RedK(D) = DHK.
wA ∈ RI
• The fitting eD of D is given as follows. For a subset A ⊂ RI
and we define eD = (F ; {e∆J }J∈H, d).
≥0 defined by wA(j) = min{σ(j); σ ∈ A} for each j ∈ I. We write eA = A − wA
Let us consider a polyhedra system D = (F ; {∆J }J∈H, d) and a stratum T ∈ H. We introduce
now a new polyhedra system DT , using Hironaka's projection of D from T , that plays an
important role in Section 7.3.
≥0, we consider the fitting vector
Let F T = (I T , HT ) be the support fabric obtained by projection of F from T . Given
J ⊂ RJ
≥0 is defined
J ∗ ∈ HT , let us take the stratum J = J ∗ ∪ T ∈ H and let us consider the subset M T
given by M T
by
J = {σ ∈ RJ ; Pj∈T σ(j) < 1}. Hironaka's projection ∇T
J → RJ ∗
J : M T
∇T
J (σ) =
σJ\T .
σ(j)
1
1 − Pj∈T
J ∗ by ∆T
J ∗ = ∇T
DT = (F T ; {∆T
J ∗}J ∗∈HT , d!d),
for every σ ∈ M T
J . We define ∆T
J (∆J ∩ M T
J ) ⊂ RJ ∗
≥0. The reader can verify that
(1)
Note that ∆T
is a polyhedra system in lower dimension. It is important to remark that the denominator of
DT is d!d instead of d.
J ∗ = ∅ if ∆J = ∅ orPj∈T σ(j) ≥ 1 for all σ ∈ ∆J . Note also that in a polyhedra
system either all the polyhedra are the empty set or none of them is empty. From now, we
suppose (unless otherwise stated) that all the polyhedra ∆ we are working with, are such that
∆ 6= ∅.
3.2 Singular Locus of Polyhedra Systems
≥0 be a characteristic polyhedron with J 6= ∅. The contact exponent δ(∆) is defined
Let ∆ ⊂ RJ
by
δ(∆) = min {σ; σ ∈ ∆} , where σ =Xj∈J
σ(j).
When J = ∅, there is only one possible polyhedron ∆ = {•} ⊂ R∅
δ({•}) = −1.
Remark 3. If ∆ = [[A]] with A ⊂ Z≥0 (Newton polyhedron), the contact exponent corresponds
to the classical idea of multiplicity.
≥0. By convention, we assume
Now, let D = (F ; {∆J }J∈H, d) be a polyhedra system. The contact exponent δ(D) is defined
by δ(D) = max{δ(∆J ); J ∈ H}. The singular locus Sing(D) is the subset
Sing(D) = {J ∈ H; δ(∆J ) ≥ 1} ⊂ H.
We have Sing(D) is a closed set, since the contact exponent gives an upper semicontinuous
function in H. We say that D is singular if Sing(D) 6= ∅, otherwise it is non-singular.
3.3 Transforms of Polyhedra Systems under Blow-ups
Let us consider the blow-up πJ (F ) = (I ′ = I ∪ {∞}, H′ = H′
s ∪ H′
F = (I, H) centered in a non-empty stratum J ∈ H. Given J ′ ∈ H′
define λJ ′ : RK → RJ ′
by
∞) of a support fabric
∞ and K = π#
J (J ′), we
λJ ′ (σ)(j) = σ(j), j 6= ∞; λJ ′ (σ)(∞) = σJ =Xj∈J
σ(j).
Let us denote by {eI,i}i∈I the standard basis of RI , that is eI,i(i′) = δi,i′ (Kronecker). If J ⊂ I
and i ∈ I we define eJ,i ∈ RJ by eJ,i = prI,J (eI,i).
4
Definition 2. The total transform Λ0
in a stratum J ∈ H is the polyhedra system Λ0
∆0
J ′ = ∆J ′ , J ′ ∈ H′
s; ∆0
J (D) of a polyhedra system D = (F ; {∆J }J∈H, d) centered
J (D) = (πJ (F ); {∆0
J ′ = [[λJ ′ (∆K)]] , J ′ ∈ H′
J ′ }J ′∈H′ , d), where
∞, K = π#
J (J ′).
If J ∈ Sing(D), the characteristic transform ΛJ (D) of D centered in J is defined by the
polyhedra system ΛJ (D) = (πJ (F ); {∆′
J ′ − eJ ′,∞ for each J ′ ∈ H′.
The characteristic transform ΛJ (D) is a polyhedra system again, because the center of the
J ′}J ′∈H′, d), where ∆′
J ′ = ∆0
blow-up is singular and then δ(∆0
{∞}) ≥ 1.
Let N = (F ; {NJ }J∈H, 1) be a Newton polyhedra system and take an integer number d ≥ 1.
Consider the polyhedra system D = N /d and a singular stratum J ∈ Sing(D). The d-moderated
transform Θd
J(N ) = N (ΛJ (D)). Note that J ∈ Sing(D)
if and only if δ(NJ ) ≥ d.
Remark 4. If there is an equivalence φ between two polyhedra systems D1 and D2, then for all
J ∈ Sing(D1), the characteristic transforms ΛJ (D1) and Λφ(J)(D2) are also equivalent.
J (N ) of N centered in J is defined by Θd
4 Reduction of Singularities.
4.1 Statements
We say that a Newton polyhedra system N = (F ; {NJ }J∈H, 1) has normal crossings if the
polyhedron NJ has a single vertex for each J ∈ H.
The property of having normal crossings is stable under blow-ups. A first objective of
reduction of singularities is to get this property.
Theorem 1 (Combinatorial Reduction to Normal Crossings). Given a Newton polyhedra sys-
tem N , there is a finite sequence of total transforms
such that Nk has normal crossings.
N → N1 → N2 → · · · → Nk
We can find proofs of this result in another contexts in [10] and [11]. Anyway, we provide a
complete proof next.
Theorem 2 (Combinatorial Reduction of Singularities). Given a polyhedra system D, there
is a finite sequence of characteristic transforms
D → D1 → D2 → · · · → Dk
such that Sing(Dk) = ∅. We call such a sequence a reduction of singularities of D.
Remark 5. Theorem 2 would be false if we had taken the condition δ(∆J ) > 1, instead of
δ(∆J ) ≥ 1, for the centers of blow-up. For instance, consider the local polyhedra system L(∆, 1)
where ∆ = [[(1, 1)]] ⊂ R{1,2}
. The only possible center would be {1, 2} and the situation is
repeated in each closed strata of the characteristic transform.
≥0
Corollary 2. Let N be a Newton polyhedra system and d a positive integer number. There
is a finite sequence of d-moderated transforms
such that δ(Nk) < d.
N → N1 → N2 → · · · → Nk
Taking d = 1, the reader can see that Corollary 2 implies Theorem 1.
The objective now is to provide a proof of Theorem 2. Although this result follows from
general Hironaka's reduction of singularities, we give a complete combinatorial proof here,
emphasizing the ideas of maximal contact developed by Hironaka, Aroca and Vicente in [1] as
well as the polyhedra control suggested by Spivakosvky in [20].
5
4.2
Induction Procedure
The proof of Theorem 2 runs essentially by induction on the dimension dim(FD) of D. More
precisely, let us consider the following statement.
CRS(n): If dim(FD) ≤ n, then D has a reduction of singularities.
The starting step of the induction is given by
Proposition 2. CRS(1) holds.
Proof. Choose the invariant I(D) given by I(D) =PJ∈H δ(∆J ). We have I(D) ≥ −1 and after
a single characteristic transform drops exactly a unit. Thus, in a certain point of the process,
we can no more perform a transform. We are done, since then the singular locus is empty. (cid:4)
We distinguish three types of singular polyhedra systems D:
1. We say that D is Hironaka quasi-ordinary if each polyhedron over a singular stratum has
a single vertex, that is, ∆J = [[{σJ }]] for all J ∈ Sing(D).
2. We say that D is special if δ(D) = 1.
3. We say that D is general if δ(D) > 1.
The study of Hironaka quasi-ordinary systems does not require the induction hypothesis as
we see in Section 6.
We consider special systems under the induction hypothesis CRS(n − 1). In this case we
reduce the problem to lower dimension projecting over a maximal contact support fabric. The
existence of maximal contact goes as follows:
1. We solve the local problem by considering Hironaka's strict tangent space.
2. We eliminate the possible "global incoherence" by invoking the induction hypothesis.
Details are given in Section 7.
Finally, for general systems, we define Spivakovsky's invariant, that "measures" how far is
the system from the quasi-ordinary case. We control the behaviour of this invariant by means
of a special system. Details are given in Section 8.
5 Examples
We consider a pair (M, E), where M is a complex analytic variety and E is a strong normal
crossings divisor as in Example 1. Recall that we have a support fabric FM,E = (I, H) associated
to (M, E). Remark that there is a stratification of M with strata SJ given by
SJ = EJ \ [i /∈J
Ei,
where EJ =Tj∈J Ej 6= ∅, for each J ∈ H.
The followings are examples of polyhedra systems that motivate our definitions:
6
5.1 Hypersurfaces
Let H ⊂ M be a closed hypersurface of (M, OM ) given by an invertible coherent ideal sheaf
I ⊂ OM and let us suppose that Ei 6⊂ H for all i ∈ I. We say that H is combinatorially regular
for (M, E) if we have the property EJ 6⊂ H, for all J ∈ H.
We can attach a polyhedra system NM,E;H to H as follows. Given J ∈ H, we consider a
point p ∈ SJ and a generator F of Ip. Let us write F in local adapted coordinates at p as
F =X aσ(y)xσ; with σ ∈ ZJ
≥0.
where the coefficients aσ(y) are germs of functions in p defined in an open set of SJ . We define
NJ by
NJ =(cid:2)(cid:2){σ ∈ ZJ
≥0; aσ(y) 6≡ 0}(cid:3)(cid:3) .
The polyhedron NJ is independent of p, the generator F and the chosen local adapted coordi-
nates. The independence of the local adapted coordinates and of the generator is straightfor-
ward. Once fixed a local coordinate system, we can move to points p′ close to p in the same
stratum and we obtain the same polyhedron in the translated coordinates. Finally, thanks to
the connectedness of the stratum, we can join two points by a compact path and repeat finitely
many times the above procedure.
This construction is compatible with the projections pJ2J1 : RJ2 → RJ1, then we obtain the
Newton polyhedra system NM,E;H .
The following statements are equivalent:
1. The hypersurface H is combinatorially regular for (M, E).
2. The Newton polyhedra system is non-singular, that is δ(NJ ) = 0 for all J ∈ H.
Let νJ (H) be the generic multiplicity of H along EJ . Note that νJ (H) = δ(NJ ). We say
that H is combinatorially equimultiple along EJ if νJ (H) = νK(H) for every K ∈ H such that
EK ⊂ EJ . Now, let us consider J ∈ H such that m = δ(NJ ) is maximal. In particular, we have
H is combinatorially equimultiple along EJ . We can perform the usual blow-up π : (M ′, E′) →
(M, E) centered in EJ . The Newton polyhedra system attached to the strict transform H ′ of
H is given by the m-moderated transform of NM,E;H . Then, applying repeatedly Corollary 2
we obtain a finite sequence of blow-ups centered in combinatorially equimultiple strata.
(M, E; H) = (M 0, E0; H 0) ← (M 1, E1; H 1) ← · · · ← (M n, En; H n) = (M ′, E′; H ′)
so that H ′ is combinatorially regular for (M ′, E′).
The polyhedra system of this example is particularly useful when we consider Newton non-
degenerate functions as in [15, 17].
5.2 Codimension one singular foliations
Let us consider now a singular foliation L of codimension one over M . We know that L is given
by an integrable and invertible coherent OM -submodule of Ω1
M [E] denotes the
sheaf of meromorphic one-forms having at most simple poles along E (See [2, 4]). Given a point
p ∈ SJ ⊂ M , the stalk Lp is generated by a meromorphic differential one-form ω ∈ Ω1
M [E],
satisfying the Frobenius integrability condition ω ∧ dω = 0. Let us write ω in local adapted
coordinates at p as
M [E], where Ω1
ω = Xσ∈ZJ
≥0
ωσxσ, with ωσ =Xi∈J
aσ,i(y)
dxi
xi
+X bσ,s(y)dys
where the coefficients aσ(y), bσ(y) are germs of functions at p, without common factor, defined
in an open set of SJ . We have that EJ is contained in the adapted singular locus Sing(L, E)
7
of L when ω0 ≡ 0. On the other hand, we say that L is combinatorially regular for (M, E) if
EJ 6⊂ Sing(L, E) for every J ∈ H.
We attach a polyhedra system NM,E;L to L as follows. Given J ∈ H, take a point p ∈ SJ
and a generator ω of Lp as before. We define NJ by
NJ =(cid:2)(cid:2){σ ∈ ZJ
≥0; ωσ 6≡ 0}(cid:3)(cid:3) .
The polyhedra NJ only depend on L and SJ , moreover, they are compatible with the projections
pJ2J1. We obtain in this way the Newton polyhedra system NM,E;L.
The following statements are equivalent:
1. The foliation L is combinatorially regular for (M, E).
2. The Newton polyhedra system is non-singular, that is δ(NJ ) = 0 for all J ∈ H.
Let νJ (L) be the adapted order of L along EJ (See [2]). Note that
νJ (L) = minnνx(cid:16)X xσaσ,i(y)(cid:17) , νx(cid:16)X xσbσ,s(y)(cid:17)oi,s
=
= min {σ; σ ∈ NJ } = δ(NJ ).
As before, we say that L is combinatorially equimultiple along EJ if νJ (L) = νK(L) for every
K ∈ H such that EK ⊂ EJ . Considering J ∈ H such that m = δ(NJ ) is maximal, we perform
the usual blow-up π : (M ′, E′) → (M, E) centered in EJ and the Newton polyhedra system
attached to the strict transform L′ of L is given by the m-moderated transform Θm(NM,E;L).
As in the preceding example, we obtain a finite sequence of blow-ups centered in combinato-
rially equimultiple strata (M ′, E′; L′) → (M, E; L) such that L′ is combinatorially regular for
(M ′, E′).
Remark 6. We can obtain an example similar to the preceding one in the case of one-dimensional
singular foliations (See [3, 12, 18]) that are locally generated by vector fields of the form
χ =X χσxσ, with χσ =Xi∈J
aσ,i(y)xi
∂
∂xi
+X bσ,s(y)
∂
∂ys
.
5.3 Monomial ideals
Let I be a monomial ideal of OM adapted to E. Following [11], we define I to be the data of
a finite collection of effective divisors {Ds}s∈S of the form
Ds =Xi∈I
ns
i Ei.
We attach a Newton polyhedra system NM,E;I to I as follows. Let σs : I → Z≥0 be the map
given by σs(i) = ns
i . For each J ∈ H, we define NJ by
NJ = [[{σsJ ; s ∈ S}]].
Note that NM,E;I is non-singular if and only if I is a principal ideal. Given J ∈ H, we can
perform the usual blow-up π : (M ′, E′) → (M, E) centered in EJ . The Newton polyhedra
system attached to the total transform I′ of I is given by the total transform of NM,E;I. Now,
we apply Theorem 1 and, as in [11], we obtain a finite sequence of blow-ups (M ′, E′; I′) →
(M, E; I) such that I′ is a principal ideal.
8
6 Hironaka Quasi-Ordinary Polyhedra Systems
In this section we prove Theorem 2 for Hironaka quasi-ordinary polyhedra systems.
Given a Hironaka quasi-ordinary system D = (F ; {∆J }J∈H, d) and a singular stratum J,
Indeed, for
J ′ }J ′∈H′, d) is also Hironaka quasi-ordinary.
the transform ΛJ (D) = (πJ (F ); {∆′
every J ′ ∈ H′
∞ and K = π#
J (J ′), we have ∆J ′ = [[{σJ ′ }]], with σJ ′ = λJ ′ (σK ) − eJ ′,∞.
Lemma 1. The set A of decreasing sequences of natural numbers is well-ordered for the
lexicographical order.
in A, we take k0 = 0 and
Proof. Given a decreasing sequence ϕ1 ≥ ϕ2 ≥ · · · ≥ ϕk ≥ · · ·
ki = min{j ≥ ki−1; ϕj′ (i) = ϕj(i), j′ ≥ j} < ∞, for each i ≥ 1. Let us consider the decreasing
sequence ϕ : N → N given by ϕ(n) = ϕkn (n). There is a positive number l ∈ N such that
ϕ(n) = ϕ(l), for all n ≥ l. As a consequence we have ϕj = ϕkl, for all j ≥ kl.
(cid:4)
Proposition 3. Every Hironaka quasi-ordinary polyhedra system has reduction of singularities.
Proof. Choose a bijective map sD : {1, 2, . . . , #H} → H such that
δ(∆sD (j)) ≥ δ(∆sD (j+1)); j ≥ 1.
Take the decreasing sequence ϕ : N → N given by ϕ(j) = dδ(∆sD (j)) if j ≤ #H and ϕ(j) = 0 if
j > #H. We choose ϕ as lexicographical invariant. Let us see that after an appropriate single
blow-up the invariant ϕ drops and then we are done by Lemma 1. We select as center a singular
J (J ′), we have
stratum J with the minimum number of elements. Given J ′ ∈ H′
∞ and K = π#
δ(∆′
J ′ ) = σJ ′ = λJ ′ (σK ) − 1 = σK + σAJ′ − 1 < δ(∆K)
and then we obtain ϕ′ < ϕ.
(cid:4)
7 Special Polyhedra Systems
In this section we prove Theorem 2 for the case of special polyhedra systems. More precisely
we prove CRS(n) for special polyhedra systems under the induction hypothesis CRS(n − 1).
7.1 Stability of Special Systems
A special polyhedra system is either non-singular or special under blow-up. Precisely, we have
Proposition 4. Let D be a special polyhedra system. Given a singular stratum J, we have
δ(ΛJ (D)) ≤ 1.
Proof. Let us denote D = (F ; {∆J }J∈H, d) and ΛJ (D) = (πJ (F ); {∆′
H′
we have δ(∆′
J ′ }J ′∈H′ , d). Take J ′ ∈
J ′ ) ≤ δ(∆K ) = 1. Given σ ∈ ∆K with σ = 1,
(cid:4)
J (J ′). We have to see that δ(∆′
J ′ ) ≤ λJ ′ (σ) − eJ ′,∞ = σ − 1 + σAJ′ ≤ 1.
∞ and K = π#
Remark 7. Let us consider a Newton polyhedra system N and an integer d ≥ 1. A stratum
J ∈ H is d-equimultiple if the polyhedra system Red{J}∩H(N /d) is special. Proposition 4 means
in this context that the multiplicity is stable under d-moderated transforms when we perform
blow-ups centered in d-equimultiple strata.
9
7.2 Hironaka's Strict Tangent Space
Given a characteristic polyhedron ∆ ⊂ RI
tangent space T (∆) of ∆, is defined by
≥0, with δ(∆) = 1, we recall that Hironaka's strict
T (∆) = {j ∈ I; ∃ σ ∈ ∆, σ = 1, σ(j) 6= 0} ⊂ I.
See [1, 13, 14, 20].
behaviour of the strict tangent space in a "horizontal" and a "vertical" way.
In this section we present the clasical stability results concerning the
Let us consider a special polyhedra system D = (F ; {∆J }J∈H, d).
Proposition 5. We have T (∆J2) ⊂ T (∆J1) ⊂ J1, for every J1, J2 ∈ Sing(D) with J1 ⊂ J2.
Proof. Given σ ∈ ∆J2 such that σ = 1, the restriction σJ1 ∈ ∆J1 also satisfies σJ1 = 1
because δ(∆J1 ) = 1. Then σ(j) = 0 for all j ∈ J2 \ J1. Thus, we have both T (∆J2) ⊂ J1 and
T (∆J2) ⊂ T (∆J1).
(cid:4)
Remark 8. In the situation of Proposition 5, we can have T (∆J2) 6= T (∆J1). For instance, let
us consider ∆ = [[(0, 0, 1), (1, 1, 0)]] ⊂ R{1,2,3}
. In this case, we obtain
≥0
{3} = T (∆) 6= T (∆{2,3}) = {2, 3}.
Consider a singular stratum J ∈ Sing(D) and let us perform the characteristic transform
J ′ }J ′∈H′ , d) of D centered in J. By Proposition 4, we know that D′
D′ = ΛJ (D) = (πJ (F ); {∆′
is either non-singular or a special system.
Proposition 6. Consider a singular stratum J ′ = (K \J)∪AJ ′ ∪{∞} ∈ H′
We have T (∆K) ⊂ AJ ′ ⊂ J. Moreover, T (∆K) ⊂ T (∆′
J ′ ) ⊂ J ′.
∞ where K = π#
J (J ′).
Proof. Given σ ∈ ∆K with σ = 1, we have δ(∆′
J ′ ) ≤ λJ ′ (σ) − eJ ′,∞ = σAJ′ ≤ 1. As a
consequence σAJ′ = 1 or equivalently T (∆K) ⊂ AJ ′ . Now, given j ∈ T (∆K) we have j ∈ AJ ′ .
As σ′ = 1 and σ′(j) = σ(j) 6= 0, then j ∈ T (∆′
(cid:4)
J ′ ).
Remark 9. The property T (∆K) ⊂ AJ ′ can be read as saying that "the new singular strata are
in the transform of the strict tangent space". This is the main classical feature of Hironaka's
strict tangent space.
Corollary 3. Given J ′ ∈ H′
∞ and K = π#
J (J ′), if T (∆K) = J then J ′ /∈ Sing(D′).
Proof. If J ′ ∈ Sing(D′) by Proposition 6, we have T (∆K) ⊂ AJ ′ , but AJ ′ ( J.
(cid:4)
7.3 Reduction of Singularities via Maximal Contact
In this section we obtain reduction of singularities for special polyhedra systems under the
assumption that there is maximal contact with a given stratum.
Let us consider a special polyhedra system D = (F ; {∆J }J∈H, d) and a stratum T ∈ H. We
say that T has maximal contact with D if T ⊂ T (∆J ), for all J ∈ Sing(D). We say also that
F T is a maximal contact support fabric of D.
Remark 10. Let T ∈ H be a stratum that has maximal contact with D. Recall that Hironaka's
projection of D over T is given by DT = (F T ; {∆T
J ∗}J ∗∈HT , d!d). Since we are assuming that
the polyhedra of D are non-empty, we have ∆T
J ∗ = ∅ for all J ∈ HT if and only if T ∈ Sing(D).
Note that in this case ΛT (D) is non-singular as a consequence of Corollary 3.
Remark 11. For every local polyhedra system D = L(∆, d), each non-empty stratum T ⊂
T (∆) = T (∆I) has maximal contact with D. That happens because of the horizontal stability of
the strict tangent space stated in Proposition 5. Indeed, for every singular stratum J ∈ Sing(D),
we have J ⊂ I and hence T (∆I ) ⊂ T (∆J ).
10
Lemma 2. Let us consider the transform ΛJ (D) where J ∈ Sing(D). If T has maximal contact
with D, then T also has maximal contact with ΛJ (D).
Proof. Recall that πJ (F ) = (I ′, H′ = H′
T ∈ H′
for the strict tangent space given in Proposition 6.
∞). Note that T ⊂ J with T 6= J and then
s. The maximal contact of T with ΛJ (D) is assured by the property of vertical stability
(cid:4)
s ∪ H′
Proposition 7. Let T /∈ Sing(D) be a stratum that has maximal contact with D and let us
consider Hironaka's projection DT of D from T . If there is a reduction of singularities for DT ,
then D also has a reduction of singularities.
Recall that DT = (F T ; {∆T
the proposition in three steps.
J ∗}J ∗∈HT , d!d) has been introduced in equation (1). We prove of
Step 1: There is a one-to-one correspondence between Sing(D) and Sing(DT ). Let us denote
by HT the set HT = {J ∈ H; T ⊂ J}. Note that HT is an open set of H. In fact, is the
smallest one containing {T } ∩ H. There is a bijection Ψ : HT → HT given by Ψ(J) = J \ T .
Note that Sing(D) ⊂ HT . We claim that Ψ(Sing(D)) = Sing(DT ). Given J ∈ Sing(D), we have
to prove that σ∗ ≥ 1 for all σ∗ ∈ ∆T
J\T . Given such a σ∗, there is σ ∈ ∆J ∩ M T
J , satisfying
σ∗ =
σJ\T
1 − σT
.
Note that σT < 1, since σ ∈ M T
J . Recalling that T ⊂ J, we have
σ∗ =
σJ\T + σT − σT
1 − σT
=
σ − σT
1 − σT
.
(2)
Then σ∗ ≥ 1 since σ ≥ 1. As a consequence J \ T ∈ Sing(DT ). Conversely, if we take
J ∗ ∈ Sing(DT ), we have to prove that σ ≥ 1, for all σ ∈ ∆J , where J = J ∗ ∪ T . Given such a
σ, we have two possibilities. If σT ≥ 1 we are done. Otherwise σT < 1 and then σ ∈ M T
J .
In this case, there is σ∗ ∈ ∆T
J ∗ given by σ∗ = σJ\T /(1 − σT ). By equation (2), we have
(1 − σT )σ∗ = σ − σT . Moreover 1 − σT ≤ σ − σT since σ∗ ≥ 1. As a consequence
σ ≥ 1 and then J ∈ Sing(D).
Step 2: Commutativity of Hironaka's projections with the blow-up transforms. We are going
to show that
(ΛJ (D))T = ΛJ\T (DT ).
We verify this commutativity first for the support fabrics and second for each polyhedron.
a) Commutativity for the support fabrics. Let us see that πJ (F )T = πJ\T (F T ). Denote
πJ (F )T =(cid:16)(I ′)T , (H′)T(cid:17),
πJ\T (F T ) =(cid:16)(I T )′, (HT )′(cid:17).
The index sets are equal, since (I ′)T = (I ∪ {∞}) \ T = (I \ T ) ∪ {∞} = (I T )′.
Let us see that (H′
because T ⊂ J. Then, for each J ′∗, we have
s. Note that K ⊃ J ⇔ K \ T ⊃ J \ T for avery K ∈ H,
s)T = (HT )′
J ′∗ ∈ (H′
s)T ⇔ J ′∗ ∪ T ∈ H′
s, J ′∗ ∩ T = ∅ ⇔ J ′∗ ∈ (HT )′
s.
Take K ∈ H with K ⊃ J. Let us see that (H′K
∞ )T = (HT )′K\T
∞ . For each J ′∗, we have
J ′∗ ∈ (H′K
∞ )T ⇒ J ′ = J ′∗ ∪ T ∈ H′K
⇒ AJ ′ \ T ( J \ T ⇒ J ′∗ ∈ (HT )′K\T
∞ .
∞ ⇒ T ⊂ AJ ′ ( J ⇒
J ′∗ ∈ (HT )′K\T
∞ ⇒ AJ ′∗ ( J \ T ⇒ A = AJ ′∗ ∪ T ( J ⇒
⇒ J ′∗ ∪ T ∈ H′K
∞ ⇒ J ′∗ ∈ (HT )′K\T
∞ .
11
b) Commutativity for the polyhedra. It is enough to prove that the following diagram com-
mutes
M T
K ∩ RK
≥0
fJ′
RJ ′
≥0 ∩ M T
J ′
∇T
K
RK\T
∇T
J′
fJ′ \T
/ RJ ′\T
≥0
where J ′ ∈ H′
is well-defined because fJ ′(σ)T = σT for all σ ∈ RK
∞, K = π#
J (J ′), T ⊂ J ′, T ⊂ K and fJ ′(σ) = λJ ′ (σ) − eJ ′,∞. Note that fJ ′
≥0.
Given σ ∈ M T
K ∩ RK
≥0, we denote
σ′ = fJ ′ (σ), σT = ∇T
K(σ), (σT )′ = fJ ′\T (σT ), (σ′)T = ∇T
J ′ (σ′).
We conclude that (σT )′ = (σ′)T from the following equalities:
(σ′)T
J ′\(T ∪{∞}) =
σJ ′\(T ∪{∞})
1 − σT
= (σT )′
J ′\(T ∪{∞};
(σ′)T (∞) =
σJ − 1
1 − σT
=
σJ\T + σT − 1
1 − σT
=
σJ\T
1 − σT
− 1 = (σT )′(∞).
Hence, D has reduction of singularities. This ends the proof of Proposition 7.
7.4 Connected Components Decomposition of Desingularization
The problem of reduction of singularities can be solved by considering one by one each connected
component of the singular locus.
Proposition 8. Let D be a polyhedra system and Sing(D) = S Cα the decomposition in
connected components of the singular locus. Assume that there is reduction of singularities for
each RedCα(D). Then there is reduction of singularities for D.
In order to simplify notation, we denote Dα = RedCα(D) and Fα the support fabric of Dα.
Let us consider a connected component Cα. By hypothesis, Dα has a reduction of singularities
Dα → D1
α → · · · → Dk
α.
This sequence induces a sequence of characteristic transforms
D → D1 → · · · → Dk,
obtained performing blow-ups in the same centers. Let F k be the support fabric of Dk. The
polyhedra system Dk satisfies the following properties:
1. For each β 6= α, there is an equivalence between Dβ and RedCβ (Dk) given by IdI , where
I = IFβ = IF k
β
, with F k
β = RedCβ (F k).
2. The decomposition of the singular locus Sing(Dk) in connected components is given by
Sing(Dk) =Sβ6=α Cβ.
Proof of Proposition 8 is concluded applying the same argument finitely many times.
12
/
/
/
7.5 Existence of Maximal Contact
Definition 3. Let D be a special polyhedra system and let Sing(D) =S Cα be the decompo-
sition of the singular locus in connected components. We say that D is consistent if for each
connected component Cα, there is a stratum Tα that has maximal contact with RedCα(D). By
convention, non-singular polyhedra systems are consistent.
Proposition 9. Under the induction hypothesis CRS(n − 1), every n-dimensional consistent
polyhedra system has reduction of singularities.
sition of the singular locus in connected components Sing(D) = S Cα.
Proof. Let D be a n-dimensional consistent polyhedra system. Let us consider the decompo-
In order to simplify
notation, we write Dα = RedCα (D). For each Cα, we have a stratum Tα that has maximal
contact with Dα. If Tα ∈ Sing(D), by Remark 10, Dα has reduction of singularities. Otherwise,
since Hironaka's projection DTα
α has dimension lower than n, there is reduction of singularities
for DTα
α and by Proposition 7 we obtain reduction of singularities for Dα. By Proposition 8 we
conclude the proof.
(cid:4)
Remark 12. There exist non-consistent polyhedra systems. For instance, consider the support
fabric F = (I, H) with I = {1, 2, 3, 4},
H = P (I) \(cid:8){1, 4}, {1, 2, 4}, {1, 3, 4}, I(cid:9).
Take over it the polyhedra system D = (F ; {∆J }J∈H, d), given by
∆{1,2,3} =(cid:2)(cid:2)(0, 0, 1), (1/2, 1, 0)(cid:3)(cid:3), ∆{2,3,4} =(cid:2)(cid:2)(1, 0, 0), (0, 1, 1/2)(cid:3)(cid:3)
and all their projections. We have Sing(D) = (cid:8){2, 3}, {1, 2, 3}, {2, 3, 4}(cid:9) is connected. We
have that T (∆{1,2,3}) = {3} and T (∆{2,3,4}) = {2}, then there is no stratum T with maximal
contact.
The following statement says that every non-consistent special system of dimension n can
be transformed in a finite number of steps in a consistent one. More precisely
Proposition 10. Under the induction hypothesis CRS(n − 1), for every n-dimensional special
polyhedra system D, there is a finite sequence of characteristic transforms D → D′ such that
D′ is consistent.
Proof. The main idea in this proof is to reduce the problem to the case of polyhedra systems
obtained by blow-up of local systems.The existence of maximal contact in those systems is
assured by Remark 11 and by the stability results in Lemma 2.
Let us consider the set K of closed strata in H and the open set U = H \ K. Recall that K is
a finite, totally disconnected closed set. We have dim(DU ) < n, since the dimension is reached
only at closed points. Then DU has a reduction of singularities
This sequence gives rise to a sequence of characteristic transforms
DU → D1
U → · · · → Dk
U .
D → D1 → · · · → Dk
(3)
obtained performing blow-ups in the same centers. Let us prove that Dk is consistent.
Write Dk
U , {∆k
J ′ }J ′∈Hk
U = (cid:16)F k
k )−1(U) and π#
know that F k
of equation (3). We have Sing(Dk) ∩ Uk = ∅ since Dk
U = F kUk where Uk = (π#
, d(cid:17) and Dk = (cid:0)F k, {∆k
U
J ′}J ′∈Hk , d(cid:1). By Corollary 1, we
k : Hk → H is given by the sequence
U is non-singular. Moreover, we have
13
Hk = Uk∪(π#
that we write as
k )−1(K). As a consequence, the singular locus Sing(Dk) is contained in (π#
k )−1(K),
(cid:16)π#
k (cid:17)−1
(K) = [J∈K
KJ , where KJ =(cid:16)π#
k (cid:17)−1
(J).
Since K is totally disconnected, we have KJ1 ∩ KJ2 = ∅ for every J1, J2 ∈ K with J1 6= J2. We
conclude that, given a connected component C of Sing(Dk), there is a unique stratum J ∈ K
J ′) for every J ′ ∈ C, because
such that C ⊂ KJ . On the other hand, we have T (∆J ) ⊂ T (∆k
of the vertical stability property of the strict tangent space stated in Proposition 6. Then the
non-empty stratum T (∆J ) has maximal contact with RedC(Dk).
(cid:4)
Corollary 4. Under the induction hypothesis CRS(n − 1), there is a reduction of singularities
for every n-dimensional special polyhedra system.
8 General Polyhedra Systems
In this section we consider the case of n-dimensional general polyhedra systems. In order to
prove it, we assume the hypothesis
CRSsp(n): n-dimensional special polyhedra systems have reduction of singularities.
Note that CRS(n − 1) implies CRSsp(n). The main idea is to transform a given general
polyhedra system into a Hironaka quasi-ordinary one, using the hypothesis CRSsp(n) and many
of the ideas in Spivakovsky's work [20]. Then we are done in view of Proposition 3.
8.1 Spivakovsky's Invariant
Let D = (F ; {∆J }J∈H, d) be a polyhedra system. We recall that the fitting of D is given by
eD = (F ; {e∆J }J∈H, d), where f∆J = ∆J − w∆J . We define Spivakovsky's invariant SpiD by
SpiD = maxnδ(f∆J ); J ∈ Sing(D)o .
Note that SpiD = 0 if and only if D is a Hironaka quasi-ordinary polyhedra system.
We define the set S(D) by S(D) =nJ ∈ Sing(D); δ(f∆J ) = SpiDo.
Lemma 3. For every J ∈ S(D), we have SpiΛJ (D) ≤ SpiD.
Proof. Let us denote ΛJ (D) = (F ′; {∆′
instead of w∆K . We need to prove that
J ′ }J ′∈H′, d) and λ = SpiD. We write for simplicity wK
δ(g∆′
J ′ ) ≤ δ(g∆K );
J ′ ∈ H′, K = π#
J (J ′).
∞, then we have
wJ ′ (j) = wK(j) if j 6= ∞ and wJ ′ (∞) = δ(∆J ) − 1. Moreover, K ∈ S(D), since K ⊃ J. Take
s we are done.
If J ′ ∈ H′
If J ′ ∈ H′
Note that δ(g∆K ) = δ(∆K) − wK .
σ ∈ ∆K such that σ − wK = δ(g∆K ). Then
J ′ ) ≤ λJ ′ (σ) − eJ ′∞ − wJ ′ = σ + σAJ′ − 1 − (wJ ′\{∞}) + (δ(∆J ) − 1) =
δ(g∆′
= δ(g∆K) + wK + σAJ′ − w(K\J)∪AJ′ − δ(f∆J ) − wJ = λ + σAJ′ − wAJ′ − λ =
= σAJ′ − wAJ′ ≤ σ = δ(g∆K ).
(cid:4)
14
8.2 Resolution of General Systems
Here we prove that Spivakovsky's invariant decreases strictly after a "well-chosen" finite se-
quence of blow-ups. We do it by means of Spivakovsky's projection introduced below and the
hypothesis CRSsp(n).
Let D = (F ; {∆J }J∈H, d) be a singular polyhedra system with SpiD 6= 0. We define Spi-
vakovsky's projection Dsp by
Dsp = (F ; {∆sp
J }J∈H, d2), where ∆sp
J =hhf∆J /SpiD ∪ ∆Jii .
We have that Dsp is a special polyhedra system and Sing(Dsp) = S(D) since
δ(∆sp
J ) = minnδ(cid:16)f∆J /SpiD(cid:17) , δ(∆J )o ≤ 1.
Proposition 11. Under the hypothesis CRSsp(n), there is a finite sequence of characteristic
transforms
such that SpiDk < SpiD and the center J i of the characteristic transform Di → Di+1 belongs
to S(Di) for each i = 0, 1, . . . , k − 1.
D = D0 → D1 → · · · → Dk
Proof. We consider J ∈ S(D) and denote λ = SpiD . We have two situations:
1. SpiΛJ (D) < λ. (In this case, we are done).
2. SpiΛJ (D) = λ.
Suppose that SpiΛJ (D) = λ. Let us prove the commutativity of Spivakovsky's projections
J (J ′), we
with the blow-up transforms. More precisely, given a stratum J ′ ∈ H′
want to see that
∞ and K = π#
hh ^[[fJ ′ (∆K )]]/λ ∪ [[fJ ′ (∆K)]]ii =hhfJ ′(cid:16)hhg∆K /λ ∪ ∆Kii(cid:17)ii ,
(4)
where fJ ′ : RK
of λJ ′ , fJ ′ (σ)(j) = σ(j) if j 6= ∞ and fJ ′ (σ)(∞) = σJ − 1.
≥0 is defined by fJ ′ (σ) = λJ ′ (σ) − eJ ′,∞. That is, recalling the definition
≥0 → RJ ′
It is not difficult to see that, the proof of equality (4) is reduced to prove the equality
^fJ ′(∆K )/λ = fJ ′(cid:16)g∆K /λ(cid:17). That is, we want to show that
(σ′ − wJ ′ )
λ
= fJ ′(cid:18) σ − wK
λ
(cid:19) , where σ ∈ ∆K, σ′ = fJ ′ (σ).
Note that we have wJ ′ (j) = wK (j) if j 6= ∞. Then we just need to see what happens with
j = ∞. Recall that wJ ′ (∞) = δ(∆J ) − 1, δ(∆J ) = δ(f∆J ) + wJ and δ(f∆J ) = λ. Then
(cid:19) (∞).
− 1 = fJ ′(cid:18) σ − wK
σJ − (s + wJ )
(σ′ − wJ ′ )(∞)
σJ − wJ
=
=
λ
λ
λ
λ
By CRSsp(n), there is a reduction of singularities of Dsp. Then the second situation cannot
(cid:4)
be repeated forever and we are done.
Now the proof of Theorem 2 is completed.
Acknowledgements I would like to express my gratitude to Professor Felipe Cano, for
all the time devoted to the supervision of this work. I am also grateful with all the referees
suggestions that have improved the text.
The author is partially supported by the Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte of
Spain (FPU14/02653 grant) and by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad from Spain,
under the Project "Algebra y geometría en sistemas dinámicos y foliaciones singulares." (Ref.:
MTM2016-77642-C2-1-P).
15
References
[1] Aroca, JM; Hironaka, H.; Vicente, JL. The theory of maximal contact. Mem. Mat. Inst.
Jorge Juan Madrid, No 29 (1975), 135 pp.
[2] Cano, F. Reduction of the singularities of codimension one singular foliations in dimension
three. Annals of Mathematics, pages 907-1011 from Volume 160 (2004)
[3] Cano, F. Desingularization Strategies of Three-Dimensional Vector Fields. Lecture Notes In
Mathematics 1259, Springer-Verlag. Berlin- Heidelberg-New York, (1987), 195pp.
[4] Cano, F.; Cerveau, D. Desingularization of nondicritical holomorphic foliations and exis-
tence of separatrices. Acta Math. 169, no. 1-2 (1992), 1-103.
[5] Cossart, V. Desingularization: A few bad examples in dimension 3, characteristic p > 0.
Topics in algebraic and non-conmutative geometry, 103-108. Contemp. Math., 324. Amer.
Math. Soc., Providence, RI, (2003).
[6] Cossart, V. Sur le polyèdre caractéristique d'une singularité. Bull. Soc. Math. France 103
(1975), no. 1, 13-19.
[7] Cossart, V. Polyèdre caractéristique et éclatements combinatoires. Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana
5 (1989), no. 1-2, 67-95.
[8] Cossart, V. Is there a notion of weak maximal contact in characteristic p>0?. Asian J.
Math. (2011) Vol. 15, no. 3, 357-368.
[9] Cossart, V.; Jannsen, U.; Saito, S. Canonical embedded and non-embedded resolution of
singularities for excellent two-dimensional schemes (Febr. 2013) ArXiv.
[10] Fernández-Duque, M. Elimination of resonances in codimension one foliations. Publica-
cions Matematiques Vol 57 No 1 (2015), pp. 75-97.
[11] Goward, Jr. Russell A. A simple algorithm for principalization of monomial ideals Trans.
Amer. Math. Soc. Vol 357 No 12 (2005)
[12] McQuillan, M.; Panazzolo, D. Almost ètale resolution of foliations. J. Differential Geom.
95 (2013), no. 2, pp. 279-319
[13] Hironaka, H. Characteristic Polyhedra Singularities J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 7 (3) (1967), pp.
251-293.
[14] Hironaka, H. Additive groups associated with points of a projective space. Ann. of Math.
(2) 92 (1970), pp. 327-334.
[15] Kouchnirenko, A. G. Polyèdres de Newton et nombres de Milnor Invent. Math. 32, no. 1
(1976), 1-31.
[16] Narashiman, R. Monomial equimultiple curves in positive characteristic Proceedings of the
American Mathematical Society. Vol 89. No 3 (1983).
[17] Oka, M. Non-degenerate complete intersection singularity. Actualités Mathématiques. Her-
mann, Paris, viii+309 (1997), pp.220
[18] Pannazolo, D. Resolution of singularities of real-analytic vector fields in dimension three.
Acta Math. 197 (2006), no. 2, 167-289.
[19] Schober, B. Characteristic polyhedra for idealistic exponents with history PhD Thesis, Uni-
versity of Regensburg (2013), 134 pages.
16
[20] Spivakovsky, M. A solution to Hironaka's polyhedra game Arith. and Geom. II, Progr.
Math. vol. 36, Birkhauser, Boston (1983), 419-432.
[21] Youssin, B. Newton polyhedra of ideals. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 87 (1990), no. 433, i-vi,
75-99.
17
|
Subsets and Splits