audio
audio | transcript
string | duration
float64 |
|---|---|---|
of the amendment on the judgment of the constitution bench will again be a moot | 3.28 |
|
since mukund came in the context, whether an endorsement would be require or not, all | 6.28 |
|
question. | 0.48 |
|
so, instead of that, we can have the amendment. | 3.12 |
|
see, what, if you are right that the amendment in fact makes things the position | 3.68 |
|
which you are espousing clearer. | 1.64 |
|
yes. then we can always say that we can deal with the amendment which has | 4.28 |
|
been brought about by parliament. i have no difficulty with that my lord, the only | 3.08 |
|
issue is how long they'll take. | 0.4 |
|
because since your lordship had heard this matter substantially therefore, i'm not. | 3.04 |
|
we'll take it in, say, the second week of july. no. i think the sessions | 5.64 |
|
may be only after. | 1.08 |
|
these conclusions that the classification. | 4.36 |
|
let it be in the last week of july. little time to push through. | 3.84 |
|
because i know what kind of agendas the parliament will have immediately. | 3.72 |
|
many pending agendas are there. | 1.48 |
|
i won't be able to say anything now. | 1.84 |
|
there is one more. | 0.36 |
|
attorney general, there's one more thing. | 2.56 |
|
yes. when parliament brings about the amendment, we'll also have to see what happens to | 4.4 |
|
those people who held licenses in the past. | 2.48 |
|
will you apply the sunset clause? | 1.56 |
|
i've asked ministry to take care of that, so that we provide for a transition. | 3.76 |
Subsets and Splits