text
listlengths 2
2
|
|---|
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Sen. Elizabeth Warren said that her children “went to public schools,” not private ones\n\nQ1: Does Sen. Elizabeth Warren have any children?\nA1: She and her first husband, Jim Warren, had two children before divorcing in 1980.\n\nQ2: Did any of Sen. Elizabeth Warren's children attend a private school?\nA2: Yes, because Only her son, who attended a tony private school\n\nQ3: Did her other child attend a private school?\nA3: No, because Her daughter grew up attending nine 'public' schools between kindergarten and 12th grade\n\nQ4: Did she make the quote?\nA4: yes but amended it later.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: QA pairs confirm she said the quote but later amended it.\n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: In US \"160 million people like their private insurance.\"\n\nQ1: What do surveys and polls reveal about the attitude of people in the US towards their medical healthcare situations?\nA1: Most people with employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) are generally satisfied with their health plans, and large shares say they feel “grateful” and “content” about their insurance while fewer say they are “angry” or “frustrated.”\n\nQ2: What is the proportion of US people contributing to employer-sponsored health cover?\nA2: In 2017, about 156 million people had employer-based coverage, representing almost half the total U.S. population and 60 percent of non-elderly adults.\n\nQ3: Of the people in the US with employer-sponsored healthcare cover, how many are estimated to be underinsured?\nA3: Twenty-eight percent of U.S. adults who have health insurance through their employer were underinsured in 2018.\n\nQ4: How many people with private health insurance were underinsured in 2018?\nA4: Of people who bought plans on their own, 42 percent reported a lack of adequate coverage in 2018.\n\nQ5: What is the adults ages 19 to 64 population of the US\nA5: Approximately 193.9 million U.S. adults ages 19 to 64 in 2018.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Q and As show evidence of people being grateful and also having issues with their employer or private health insurance - cannot conclude from this that 160m people ‘like’ their private insurance.\n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Northern Ireland has the highest femicide rate in Western Europe\n\nQ1: What country has the highest femicide rate?\nA1: Finland does with 0.61\n\nQ2: What is the femicide rate in Northern Ireland?\nA2: 0.53 making it the 2nd highest",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: it appears that it is the second highest femicide rate in western europe\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Saving A Quarter A Day For A Year Will Get You $9100.25.\n\nQ1: How many days in a non leap year?\nA1: The calendar year is 365 days long,\n\nQ2: How long is a leap year?\nA2: If the year is exactly divisible by four, an extra day is added to February to make the year 366 days long.\n\nQ3: How many U.S 'quarters' are there in $1\nA3: The quarter is worth 25 cents, or $0.25\n\nQ4: What is $9.100.25 divided by 0.25?\nA4: 3.640.10.\n\nQ5: What is 0.25 x 365?\nA5: 91.25",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: $0.25 x 365 days = $91.25. $91.25 is less than $9100.25.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch’s net worth is as high as $23 million.\n\nQ1: What is Marie Yovanovitch’s net worth\nA1: Yovanovitch has assets worth between $1.3 million and $3.3 million.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answer and credible source shows that the ambassador has a lot less than 23 million in assets so the claim is refuted. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: In the 266 days since we sent this bill, about 25,000 people have died from gun violence in our country, 47 percent of them teenagers or children younger than that.\n\nQ1: How many people die as a result of gun violence in the US every year on average\nA1: 35,141\n\nQ2: How many of these people are aged between 0-19 years old\nA2: 2,737\n\nQ3: What is the percentage of death for fatalities as a result of gun violence aged between 0-19\nA3: 7.78%",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: It seems the numbers are quite a bit lower, therefore the claim is refuted \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Bay leaves eliminate the need for a pharmacy as the plant cures or alleviates everything from digestive disorders to kidney stones.\n\nQ1: Have any studies been done to see the impact of Bay leaves?\nA1: Reasearch by the NCBI - Bay leaves (Laurus nobilis) have been shown to improve insulin function in vitro but the effects on people have not been determined.\n\nQ2: Was there any negative findings in research?\nA2: NCBI also has published research that shows bay leaves can interfere with blood sugar control and may not be safe for people with diabetes.\n\nQ3: So are there any studies that show that bay leaves do away with the need for a pharmacy?\nA3: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Q&A 1 shows whilst bay leaves are good for many ailments, they certainly do not cure everything as claimed and may be harmful to some people with diabetes.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Facebook post stating that Democrats are asking why should their be a Second Amendment.\n\nQ1: what is the democrats' stance on the second amendment\nA1: Nearly two-thirds of Democrats (64%) say there would be fewer mass shootings in the U.S. if it were harder for people to legally obtain guns;\n\nQ2: what is the source of ths claim\nA2: Facebook\n\nQ3: Do tighter gun laws mean the second amendment is effectively abolished?\nA3: The Second Amendment, as courts have come to interpret it, undoubtedly protects a fundamental constitutional right, but it also leaves room for a potentially wide range of regulation.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There is no evidence offered that Democrats are asking why should there be a Second Amendment.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: 13 Uber drivers were arrested for alleged sex trafficking in Atlanta, Georgia.\n\nQ1: Where were 13 people arrested on November 2019\nA1: They were arrested at Statesboro\n\nQ2: What were the 13 people arrested for\nA2: The Statesboro Police Department's Impact team arrested 13 people in an undercover prostitution operation.\n\nQ3: Is any of the 13 arrested an Uber driver\nA3: No answer could be found.\n\nQ4: Were 13 Uber drivers arrested for alleged sex trafficking in Atlanta, Georgia?\nA4: Atlanta police have no record of it. \n\n(Video beginning: 1:00)\n\nQ5: Were those arrested in Statesboro linked to sex trafficking?\nA5: During SPD’s two day operation, all prostitutes contacted were screened for signs of being trafficked, with no trafficked persons being identified, according to the SPD.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: According to the sources 13 people were arrested in an undercover prostitution operation. It did not mention if they are Uber drivers and if kit was in Atlanta, Georgia.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Muslim Body Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind have urged Congress Against Supporting Shiv Sena.\n\nQ1: What is Shiv Sena?\nA1: Shiv Sena (Devanāgarī: शिव सेना Śīv Senā, meaning Army of Shiva, referring to Shivaji) is a nationalist political party in India founded on June 19, 1966 by Bal Thackeray.\n\nQ2: Are Shiv Sena, NCP and Congress forming a government together in Maharashtra?\nA2: NCP chief Sharad Pawar met Sonia Gandhi to discuss a potential power share.\n\nQ3: What is Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind?\nA3: The Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind is a top Muslim body/organisation.\n\nQ4: Did the Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind Urge Congress Against Supporting Shiv Sena?\nA4: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answers explain the claim but do not provide any evidence for or against the claim.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The U.S. Constitution sets up the election redistricting process to be partisan.\n\nQ1: What is partisan?\nA1: showing strong and usually unfair support for one particular person, group, or idea\n\nQ2: What is gerrymandering?\nA2: Gerrymandering in the United States has been used to increase the power of a political party. Gerrymandering is the practice of setting boundaries of electoral districts to favor specific political interests within legislative bodies, often resulting in districts with convoluted, winding boundaries rather than compact areas. The term \"gerrymandering\" was coined after a review of Massachusetts's redistricting maps of 1812 set by Governor Elbridge Gerry noted that one of the districts looked like a salamander.\n\nQ3: What is redistrictng in the US?\nA3: In the United States, redistricting takes place in each state about every ten years, after the decennial census. It defines geographical boundaries, with each district within a state being geographically contiguous and having about the same number of state voters. The resulting map affects the elections of the state's members of the United States House of Representatives and the state legislative bodies.\n\nQ4: What does the US law say about partisanship?\nA4: \"The time has come for this court to make clear that the Constitution does not provide courts with the tools or the responsibility to say how much partisan motivation is too much,\" they said in their court filings.\n\nQ5: What does the US Constitution say about election proceedures?\nA5: SECTION. 4.\nThe Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for\nSenators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each\nState by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at\nany time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as\nto the Places of chusing Senators.\nThe Congress shall assemble at least once in every Year, and\nsuch Meeting shall be [on the fi rst Monday in December,]*\nunless they shall by Law appoint a different Day.\nSECTION. 5.\nEach House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns\nand Qualifi cations of its own Members, and a Majority\nof each shall constitute a Quorum to do Business; but a\nsmaller Number may adjourn from day to day, and may be\nauthorized to compel the Attendance of absent Members,\nin such Manner, and under such Penalties as each House\nmay provide.\nEach House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings,\npunish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the\nConcurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.\nEach House shall keep a Journal of its Proceedings, and\nfrom time to time publish the same, excepting such Parts\nas may in their Judgment require Secrecy; and the Yeas\nand Nays of the Members of either House on any question\nshall, at the Desire of one fi fth of those Present, be entered\non the Journal.\nNeither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three\ndays, nor to any other Place than that in which the two\nHouses shall be sitting",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: From the QA number 4th it does not seem being 0artisan is required. Therefore the label is ref5\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: No other city in America did what (New York) did. We reduced murders by 50%, reduced police shootings to historic lows, reduced the number of people incarcerated by nearly 40% during Bloomberg's tenure\n\nQ1: What was the murder rate before and after Bloomberg assumed office\nA1: 332 Murders in 2013 during his final tenure, down from 649 in 2001 when he assumed office\n\nQ2: Which cities have reduced incarceration rate, homicide rate and police shootings\nA2: No answer could be found.\n\nQ3: Who made the claim\nA3: Michael Bloomberg\n\nQ4: What is the percentage decrease of incarceration rate in New York\nA4: 41% Decrease Since 2008",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Going by the figures - there definitely seems to be around a 50% drop in murders and 40% + decrease in incarcerated people.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Ron Kind is the only member of Congress that voted for inquiries into Bill Clinton and Donald Trump\n\nQ1: Did Ron Kind vote in favour of the impeachment of Bill Clinton?\nA1: Yes, because He voted Aye.\n\nQ2: Did Ron Kind vote in favour of the impeachment of Donald Trump?\nA2: Yes, because He voted Yes.\n\nQ3: Did any other US representative vote in favour of both impeachments?\nA3: No, because Ron Kind is the only one who appears on both lists as voting in favour.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The Q&A confirm that Ron Kind is the only one who voted for inquiries into Bill Clinton and Donald Trump.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Under the current system, people on a work, study or family visa in the UK incur average NHS costs of £625 per year.\n\nQ1: What is the Average cost to the NHS by people on a work, study or family visa in the UK?\nA1: analysis by officials at the Department of Health and Social Care has concluded that each payer of the IHS ends up costing the NHS an average of £625 a year.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: From the QA it seems that the number is justified. Therefore the claim is su\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Increasing the international health surcharge in the UK to £625 and extending it to all foreign workers, including EU migrants after Brexit, will raise over £500 million a year.\n\nQ1: What is the current immigration health surcharge?\nA1: You’ll have to pay:\n\n£300 per year for a student or Tier 5 (Youth Mobility Scheme) visa, for example £600 for a 2-year visa\n\n£400 per year for all other visa and immigration applications, for example £2,000 for a 5-year visa\n\nQ2: Who is excluded from paying the surcharge?\nA2: Who does not need to pay or get an IHS reference number You’ll be able to use the NHS without paying the surcharge or getting a reference number if:\n\nyou’re applying for indefinite leave to enter or remain\n\nyou’re a diplomat or a member of a visiting armed forces and not subject to immigration control\n\nyou’re a dependant of a member of the UK’s armed forces\n\nyou’re the dependant of a member of another country’s armed forces who is exempt from immigration control\n\nyou’re a family member of a European national with European Union treaty rights\n\nyou’re applying for a visa for the Isle of Man or Channel Islands\n\nyou’re a British Overseas Territory citizen resident in the Falkland Islands\n\nyou’re an asylum seeker or applying for humanitarian protection (or you’re their dependant)\n\nyou’re a domestic worker who has been identified as a victim of slavery or human trafficking\n\nyou’re applying for discretionary leave to remain in the UK as someone who has been identified as a victim of slavery or human trafficking (or you’re their dependant)\n\nthe Home Office’s domestic violence concession applies to you (or you’re their dependant)\n\nbeing made to leave the UK would be against your rights under Article 3 of the European Convention of Human Rights (or you’re their dependant)\n\nQ3: How is the NHS funded?\nA3: How is the NHS in England currently funded?\n\nThe NHS is funded mainly through general taxation supplemented by National Insurance contributions.\n\nWhile the NHS is generally described as being ‘free at the point of use’, patients have been required to contribute towards the cost of some services (eg, prescriptions and dental treatment) since 1951. Exemption arrangements are in place that cover many patients, including those aged under 16 or 60 and over, as well as recipients of specific state benefits. The exemptions in place resulted in 90 per cent of all prescription items in England being dispensed free of charge last year (Health and Social Care Information Centre 2016).\n\nThe relative contribution from each of these sources of finance – general taxation, National Insurance and user charges – has fluctuated over the years (see Commission on the Future of Health and Social Care in England 2014b). For example, the proportion of income from user charges, from a high of 5 per cent in 1960 remained at 1.2 per cent between 2007 and 2011 (Hawe and Cockcroft 2013).\n\nQ4: Does the government plan on raising the immigration health surcharge?\nA4: At the moment, those coming from outside Europe to visit the UK for more than six months must pay the Immigration Health Surcharge (IHS) – an annual £400 charge for NHS care, or £300 if they are students.\n\nBut the new analysis by officials at the Department of Health and Social Care has concluded that each payer of the IHS ends up costing the NHS an average of £625 a year.\n\nQ5: Will the increase in the immigration health surcharge raise over £500 million a year?\nA5: No answer could be found.\n\nQ6: Will the increase in the immigration health surcharge from £400 - £625 raise over £500 million a year?\nA6: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: It seems from the last QA that there is no proof to the claim, therefore the label is not enough evidence\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Sambucol can treat the flu and make you feel better within 48 hours and almost symptom-free by 72 hours.\n\nQ1: Is Sambucol an effective flu treatment?\nA1: Some small studies have shown some homeopathic supplements can help relieve flu symptoms but there are not enough trials to conclusively state that Sambucol is an effective flu treatment.\n\nQ2: Does sambucolusa cure flu within 72 hours?\nA2: The sambucolusa website does not claim this. It only states that sambucolusa can help support the immune system.\n\nQ3: Does sambucolusa make people feel better within 48 hours?\nA3: The sambucolusa website does not claim this. It only states that sambucolusa can help support the immune system.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Not enough evidence from this answer to confirm or deny this claim. \n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Dwayne Johnson 'The Rock' Johnson dies at 47\n\nQ1: Is Dwayne Johnson alive?\nA1: Yes, because Death was a hoax.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The question tackles the core of the question and has a straightforward answer. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: President Obama fired every Bush appointed ambassador upon his election.\n\nQ1: Did Obama remove all previously appointed Bush Ambassadors when he took office?\nA1: The incoming Obama administration has notified all politically-appointed ambassadors that they must vacate their posts as of Jan. 20, the day President-elect Barack Obama takes the oath of office, a State Department official said.\n\nThe clean slate will open up prime opportunities for the president-elect to reward political supporters with posts in London, Paris, Tokyo and the like. The notice to diplomatic posts was issued this week.\n\nPolitical ambassadors sometimes are permitted to stay on briefly during a new administration, but the sweeping nature of the directive suggests that Obama has little interest in retaining any of Bush's ambassadorial appointees.\n\nMost ambassadors, of course, are foreign service officers, but often the posts involving the most important bilateral relations (such as with Great Britain, Japan and India) or desirable locales (such as the Bahamas) are given to close friends and well-heeled contributors of the president.\n\nQ2: Were they Fired?\nA2: No they rotated out of their positions as political appointees do with every administration.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: \"Fired\" is a strong word to be used in this claim. \"Political ambassadors sometimes are permitted to stay on briefly during a new administration...\" are the words used in the source evidence. Therefore cherry-picking is the claim label chosen.\n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The Chinese government spent the same amount -- Rs 3,000 crore -- to construct a bridge that the Indian government spent to build the Statue of Unity in Gujarat.\n\nQ1: Has a reverse search been done on the image of the Bridge?\nA1: Yes it was shown to be -Jiaozhou Bay Bridge\n\nQ2: How much did this bridge cost to build?\nA2: $1.55 billion roughly Rs 10,000 Crore\n\nQ3: How much did it cost to build the Statue of Unity?\nA3: Around Rs 3000 Crore",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Stated that bridge cost 3.3x More than the statue.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Tirupati Balaji Temple Will Donate Rs. 100 Crores For Ram Mandir.\n\nQ1: How will the Ram Mandir temple be built\nA1: The Supreme Court-mandated board of trustees will be set up on the lines of Gujarat's Somnath Trust and Ram temple in Ayodhya will be constructed with funds donated by the devotees.\n\nQ2: What is the official stand of the Tirupati Balaji temple in regards to making donations to the Ram Mandir\nA2: The temple trust has no made any decision for donating any amount to the Ram Mandir",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The temple trust has no made any decision for donating any amount to the Ram Mandir \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: In 2019 there have been over fifty reports of attacks and harassment on Nigerian journalists.\n\nQ1: what's the total number of verified attacks and harassment against journalists in Nigeria in 2019?\nA1: there was 76 total reports of attacks and harassment on Nigerian journalists in 2019",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: From the Qa it seems that ghe claim is supported \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Political Scientist Alexey Martynov said ‘Transnistria is an Independent State.’\n\nQ1: is Political Scientist Alexey Martynov quoted as saying ‘Transnistria is an Independent State.’\nA1: Yes, because Confirmed in video.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answer and source clearly show that the scientist did say the quote so the claim is supported.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The US is winning World Trade Organization cases for the first time.\n\nQ1: Is The US winning World Trade Organization cases for the first time?\nA1: The World Trade Organization’s history of decisions shows this to be untrue. The United States usually prevails in cases that it brings before the global body.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Q&A pair say the statement is untrue\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Ivanka Trump has created 14 million jobs.\n\nQ1: How has Ivanka Trump created over 12 Million jobs\nA1: She has no created 12 million jobs, she's part of a committee that has plans that is estimated to create more than 6.5 million education, training and skill-building opportunities over the next five years",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: From the Q&As it is clear that Ivanka Trump has not created 14 million jobs, so its refuted. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Every UK taxpayer will have an additional bill of £2,400 per year under a Labour Government.\n\nQ1: Was the Labour election manifesto released when this claim was made?\nA1: No, because Labour had not yet released their election manifesto at the time of this claim. It was due to be released 21/11/19",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The claim was made prior to the release of Labours manifesto which means theres no actual confirmed policies to base the claim on, the claim was also made by the Conservative party and comes from the Telegraph which is known for being strongly right wing and leaning towards the Conservative party, so the claim is likely biased. The claim is likely just propaganda and therefore should be refuted as it's based on no hard facts and not on the current Labour manifesto as the QA discovered.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: After losing 60,000 factories America is now gaining over 10,000 brand-new, beautiful factories.\n\nQ1: What is the actual number of new factories added since the Trump administration?\nA1: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answer does not give me any evidence for or against the claim so there is not enough evidence.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: South African public utility Eskom generates approximately 45% of the electricity used in Africa\n\nQ1: How much electricity does Eskom supply to Africa each year?\nA1: In the year 2018-2019 Eksom sold 208,319 GWh of electricity.\n\nQ2: How much electricity is used in Africa each year?\nA2: Africa Energy Outlook 2019 puts electricity demand in Africa at 700,000 GWh.\n\nQ3: Is 208,319 45% of 700,000?\nA3: No, because 208,319 / (700,000 / 100) = 29.76%",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Clear questions leading to a clear answer which shows the claim is exaggerated.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Sri Lanka's Election Commissions announced a three-day social media ban around the country November 16 2019 election.\n\nQ1: Was there a 3 day social media ban for the Sri Lankan 2019 election?\nA1: No, because Election Commission Chairman Mahinda Deshapriya yesterday ruled out any plans to block social media websites during the last leg of the election period.\n\nHe told Daily Mirror that there was no need for such drastic moves though there was speculation about social media platforms such as Facebook may be blocked.\n\nEarlier, Facebook announced that it had a mechanism to remove fake and malicious content which might mislead voters or discourage them from voting.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The ban has been ruled out by officials such as Election Commission Chairman Mahinda Deshapriya, and Facebook suggested that fake and malicious content which would mislead voters would be removed. The claim appears to be refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: South African public utility Eskom generates approximately 95% of the electricity used in South Africa.\n\nQ1: How much electricity did Eskom generate for South Africa in 2018\nA1: South Africa Electricity Distribution: ESKOM: Western Cape data was reported at 18, 090 GWh in Sep 2018.\n\nQ2: How much electricity was generated for consumption in South Africa\nA2: 18,280 gigawatt-hours (GWh)\n\nQ3: What percentage of 18, 280 GWh is 18, 090 GWh\nA3: 98%",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Although the two figures are for different months in 2018 and 2019 they give a result of 98%. Assuming that electricity generation is fairly stable I think the claim of \"approximately 95%\" is supported.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: US manufacturing jobs have increased by over 600,000\n\nQ1: How many new manufacturing jobs were there in the USA after Trump took office?\nA1: The Labor Department shows that, through October, the United States has added 443,000 manufacturing jobs since Mr. Trump took office",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: the answer shows the number is not over 600,000 as claimed\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: About 2% of pregnancy terminations are between 20 and 24 weeks in Great Britain in 2018.\n\nQ1: How many abortins were carried out in GB in 2018?\nA1: There were 200,608 abortions for women resident in\nEngland and Wales in 2018 and 205,295 abortions\nincluding non-residents.\n\nQ2: How many legal abortions were there in GB in 2018 at 20 - 24 weeks?\nA2: 20 weeks and over 3,962",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The Q&A pair indicates a percentage of 1.8, which is about 2%. Going by this, the claim is valid. \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Scotland’s youth unemployment rate fell by 0.3 percentage points over 2019.\n\nQ1: Where does the data for this claim come from?\nA1: X02 Regional labour market: Estimates of unemployment by age\n\nQ2: How much did the rate of youth employment change in 2019?\nA2: In the year to July 2019, youth unemployment in Scotland increased by 0.9 percentage points.\n\nQ3: What is the view of the independent UK Statistics Authority on the claim?\nA3: Data from the LFS at this level of detail are not considered reliable, and are not classed as National Statistics. The APS is the more reliable data source for estimates of youth unemployment, due to its larger sample size, particularly when considering a breakdown by age and country within the UK. It would be helpful to make this clear both in the summary published by the Scottish Government and any related use of the estimates, including on social media.\n\nWe welcome the Scottish Government’s commitment to working with the Office for National Statistics (ONS) to improve the presentation of youth unemployment rates in Scotland, and its wish to consider whether it is appropriate to continue publishing estimates based on the LFS.\n\nQ4: Why are the ONS statistics considerered more reliable than those quoted in the claim?\nA4: It is based on a larger sample size.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The evidence finds that the claim came from data which is not as reliable. The correct figure on Scotland's youth employment in 2019 was an increase of 0.9 percentage points.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: More people are coming home from Iraq with brain cancer than any other war.\n\nQ1: Have any studies been done that show how many people that served in Iraq came back with brain cancer?\nA1: Incidence and Prevalence of Selected Diseases among Users of VHA Services and Veterans of\nthe Vietnam War, 1990-1991 Gulf War, and Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi\nFreedom/Operation New Dawn (OEF/OIF/OND)\n\n0.03% for gulf war and Iraq and Afghanistan veterans.\n\nQ2: In the same study how many veterans had brain cancer when returning from Vietnam?\nA2: 0.04% for Vietnam veterans",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The 1st q7a pair state a study that was done relating to the claim, the 2nd q7a air state that the study found higher figures from another war which disputes that the war in the claim had the highest figures.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Burn pits - open air waste incineration sites — are behind the purported increase in brain cancer in veterans.\n\nQ1: Is there a prevalence of brain cancer in veterans of the iraq war more than veterans of other war efforts\nA1: The prevalence of brain cancer in the veterans of the gulf war and Iraq war are the same at 0.03%\n\nQ2: Are there a group of veterans that have higher prevalence of brain cancer than the veterans of the Iraq war\nA2: The Vietnam veterans have higher prevalence at 0.04%\n\nQ3: Is there a co-relation between burn pits and brain cancer\nA3: It is unable to say whether long-term health effects are likely to result from exposure to emissions from the burn pit\n\nQ4: What war does the claim refer to that the veterans in the claim are returning from?\nA4: The Iraq war.\n\nQ5: Is there a prevalence of brain cancer in veterans of the Iraq war more than veterans of other wars?\nA5: The prevalence of brain cancer in the veterans of the gulf war and Iraq war are the same at 0.03%\n\nQ6: Do many Veterans claim to have been diagnosed with brain cancer due to burn pits in Iraq war?\nA6: Yes, because The site burnpits360.org shows they support thousands of victims of invisible war wounds.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There is not enough evidence to say whether burn pits are the reason behind the increase.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The United States of America has removed Zamfara from the list of terrorist states in Nigeria\n\nQ1: What is the US Travel Advisory's report closest to the date of the claim, on 10/11/2019?\nA1: On June 16, 2021, the US Travel Advisory advises:\n\nDo Not Travel to:\nBauchi, Gombe, Kaduna, Kano, Katsina, and Zamfara states due to kidnapping\n\nQ2: What is the report on the US Travel Advisory website for October 29, 2019?\nA2: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Zamfara seems to be on the list of 'do not travel' due to kidnapping and not due to it being a terrorist state. It is unclear if Zamfara was ever on the terrorist states list as the questions/answers do not clarify this. \n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: In 2018, South African police service officers were accused of 217 cases of torture and 3,661 cases of assault\n\nQ1: Who investigates the offences in South Africa?\nA1: (IPID) Independent Police Investigative Directorate\n\nQ2: How many tortures were there in South Africa 2017/2018 compared to 2018/2019?\nA2: Torture figures\n2017-2018 217 \n2018 - 2019 270\n\nQ3: How many assaults were there in South Africa 2017/2018 compared to 2018/2019?\nA3: Assault figures \n\n2017/2018- 3661 \n2018/2019 - 3835",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The quoted source supports the claim. However, the questions are too broad, they would not lead to this source. Q1.What offences, by whom?\nQ2 Needs to say torture by police &, likewise Q3 needs to say police assault.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: 558 people were killed by the police in 2018, while 201 people died in police custody\n\nQ1: How many people in South Africa died in police custody in 2018?\nA1: 201 (table 1b on page 38)\n\nQ2: How many people were killed by the South African police in 2018?\nA2: 558 (table 4, page 42)",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answers and credible sources show that the numbers in the claim are correct so the claim is supported.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Confederate veterans were conferred with many of the same benefits of other United States military veterans by Acts of Congress back in 1929 and 1957\n\nQ1: Did Congress make a law to Designate Confederate Soldiers as United States Veterans?\nA1: No portion of the law appears to confer any privilege other than markers for graves of Confederate soldiers, nor does it grant Confederate soldiers status equal to those of veterans of the United States military.\n\nQ2: When were the last recorded confederate solders deaths?\nA2: The last recorded Confederate soldier deaths were in 1959, meaning that the 1957 law had negligible effects for those under its provisions, and in any event the law again conferred no status or other benefit to Confederate soldiers themselves.\n\nQ3: What benefits are available to a U.S war veteran?\nA3: - Tax benefits\n- Automobiles and Adaptive Equipment for Disabled Veterans\n- Basic Medical Benefits\n- Caregiver Programs and Services\n- Cash-Out Refinance Loan\n- Children of Women Vietnam Veterans Health Care Benefits\n- Clothing Allowance\n- Compensated Work Therapy\n- Dental Care\n- Direct Home Loans \n- Education\n- Family Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance\n- Foreign Medical Program\n- Gratuitous Service-Disabled Veterans Insurance\n- Headstones, Markers and Medallions for Placement in Private Cemeteries\n- Health Care Benefits for Dependents \n- Home Based Primary Care\n- Homeless Veterans Assistance\n- Interest Rate Reduction Refinance Loan\n- Jobs for Veterans State Grants\n- Mental Health Residential Rehabilitation\n- Mental Health Services\n\nQ4: What are some benefits confederate solders get in the U>S?\nA4: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) furnishes upon request, at no charge to the applicant, a Government headstone or marker for the unmarked grave of any deceased eligible Veteran in any cemetery around the world, regardless of their date of death.\n\nQ5: Are confederate veterans equal to U.S veterans concerning benefits?\nA5: 38 USC Section 101 defines \"veteran\" for benefit purposes. with Confederacy not mentioned in it, \nChapter 38 is entitled \"Veterans' Benefits.\" The Spanish American War, but no 'Confederacy'",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: It seems from the last QA as confederate veterans are not mentioned, in the documents, that the label is refuted\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Since 2002, South Africa’s police force has grown by 50%\n\nQ1: What was the number of police staff in 2002/2003\nA1: 132,310\n\nQ2: What was the number of police staff in 2018/2019\nA2: 192,277\n\nQ3: What was the percentage increase in the number of police staff in South Africa between 2002-2019\nA3: 45.3%",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: South Africa's police force grew by 45.3% from 2002 to 2019, not 50% as the claim suggests. Hence, the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The South African Police Service kills three times more people per capita than the United States police force\n\nQ1: What is the South African Police Service killings in 2019?\nA1: figures on the number of people who died as a result of police action show 558 in 2017/18\n\nQ2: What is the the USA's Police Service killings in 2019?\nA2: 990 deaths\n\nQ3: What is south Africa's population?\nA3: South Africa’s 2018 population 57,73 million in 2018,\n\nQ4: What is the U.S population?\nA4: 327,167,434\n\nQ5: What does 558 deaths by SA police work out per capita for the population total of 57,73 million?\nA5: 9.7 reported deaths as a result of police action for each million people in South Africa.\n\nQ6: What does 990 police killings from a population of 327,167,434 work out to per capita for the U.S?\nA6: 3.0 deathes per million people for the U.S",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: South african police kill 9 people per million people, and the US 3 per million, which is three times more people. \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Nancy Pelosi said Dems will 'shut it all down' if they don't get their way on impeachment.\n\nQ1: Where did this story come from?\nA1: The story originated from an article published by a satire website Potatriots Unite on November 9, 2019, titled \"Pelosi Says Dems Will 'Shut It All Down' If They Don't Get Their Way On Impeachment\"\n\nQ2: What is Potatriots Unite?\nA2: A satire website.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Q&A 1 states the website the claim originated on, Q&A 2 states that the website is a satire website, so this claim is satire.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: South Africa remains the most unequal society in the world.\n\nQ1: How is inequality measured ?\nA1: Both income and wealth inequality are commonly measured with the Gini index or coefficient. This is a measure that provides a figure between 0 (perfect equality) to 1 (perfect inequality),\n\nQ2: What is South Africa's Gini Coefficient?\nA2: The report says that in 2015, South Africa had a Gini coefficient of 0.63. This was based on individual consumption – one of the ways to measure income inequality. \n\nThis put South Africa at the top of a list of 164 countries. Namibia’s Gini coefficient of 0.59 placed it second, with Suriname, Zambia and the Central African Republic next on the list.\n\nQ3: Is the Gini Coefficient a reliable way to measure inequality?\nA3: The first is the data on which the calculation is based. Sulla said “sampling errors” in the 2014/15 Living Conditions Survey were likely. \n\n“The data is a survey, not a census of every family in South Africa.” \n\nCountry surveys also differ in terms of methodology and types of measures, which can make comparing the data tricky, he said.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Although the details for South Africa give a good explanation, there are no comparison figures for other countries. So there is nothing to compare in order to decide if South Africa has a more unequal society than other countries. \n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Total university enrolment for university in South Africa, 1994 was around 300,000.\n\nQ1: How many South Africans were enrolled in University in 1994?\nA1: 495,396 (page 24)",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The number was closer to 500,000\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Access to antiretroviral therapy in the South African public health sector was given to 45,500 patients in 2004.\n\nQ1: How many people were on anti-retroviral treatment in 2004 in South Africa\nA1: 47, 500\n\nQ2: Were all the 47, 500 people getting it from the public sector\nA2: The public sector was only catering to 9, 600 of them",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The public sector was only catering to 9, 600 of them \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The size of the South African economy over the past 25 years has doubled.\n\nQ1: What was South Africa's GDP in 1994?\nA1: $225.6 billion in 1994\n\nQ2: What was South Africa's GDP in 2018?\nA2: $429.8 billion in 2018",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answers and sources show that the economy has nearly doubled so the claim is supported.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: 84% of all households in South Africa have electricity.\n\nQ1: How many households in South Africa have electricity?\nA1: 84,7% as of 2018.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Confirmed (although slightly higher at 84.7%)\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: In 2017, South Africa recorded an inflow of foreign direct investment amounting to R17 billion.\n\nQ1: What is foreign direct investment?\nA1: Foreign direct investments are made by companies or individuals from one country into businesses in another country.\n\nQ2: How much Foreign direct investments were invested in 2017, in South Africa?\nA2: Data from the UN Conference on Trade and Development shows that US$1.325 billion of foreign money was invested in South Africa in 2017. This is about R17.3 billion at the 30 June 2017 exchange rate.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: From the Q&As it seems that the figure is correct in the claim. \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Over the past five years the South African government has invested in electrifying more than a million homes.\n\nQ1: How many homes has the South African Government invested to build with electricity grid connection?\nA1: 1,164,758",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The exact figures of homes in South Africa over five years, that benefited from the electricity project is even a few hundred more than a million homes. \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Since introducing the Safe initiative, 699 schools in SA have been provided with safe and appropriate sanitation facilities and projects and a further 1,150 schools are either in planning, design or construction stages.\n\nQ1: What is the number of safe and appropriate sanitation facilities that have been provided since the safe initiative launched\nA1: Numbers are ‘not independently verifiable'\n\nQ2: What number of schools still have their safe sanitation facilities either in planning, design, or construction stages\nA2: 1,062 schools are either in the planning, design or construction stages",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The numbers of schools provided with with safe and appropriate sanitation facilities and those schools that are either in the planning, design or construction stages does not tally with the ones in the source. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Donald Trump and the Republicans have spent the past four years trying to dismantle the Affordable Care Act. They are doing everything they can — without a plan to replace it\n\nQ1: What are some of the indications that US President Donald Trump and the Republicans have spent the past four years trying to dismantle the Affordable Care Act.\nA1: The Trump administration told a federal court late Monday that it would ask judges to toss out the entire Affordable Care Act, a decision that cast further uncertainty over the future of a federal law that has extended health insurance to millions of Americans.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answers provide ample evidence of attempts to undermine or weaken the ACA, including trying to repeal the entire law.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Over the past five years the SA government has built two new universities.\n\nQ1: how many universities has been built by the SA Government\nA1: An amount of R3.1 billion has been allocated over the medium term to the Department of Higher Education \nand Training to continue construction at the University of Mpumalanga and the Sol Plaatje University. New \nfacilities include lecture rooms, laboratories, sport and recreation amenities, and student accommodation. \nThese two institutions, which opened their doors in 2014, will jointly increase their intake to 5 181 students in \nthe 2018 academic year.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: This claim is mostly correct, 2 new universities are being built. \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The SA government launched the Safe initiative in August 2018.\n\nQ1: When was the SAFE Initiative launched in South Africa\nA1: 14 Aug 2018",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Reliable source and easy to clarify as correct.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Over the past five years the SA government has invested in building hundreds of thousands of new homes.\n\nQ1: What date was the claim made?\nA1: 7/11 2019\n\nQ2: Has the SA government invested in building hundreds of thousands of new homes over the 5 years prior to the claim?\nA2: Between 2013 and 2018, close to 500,000 homes, or “housing units”, were delivered",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Using the stats supplied in the Q&A source link, this claim appears to be true. However if the prefabricated house units as quoted were not erected, this figure may not be accurate. \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The SA government launched the Youth Employment Service, which is placing unemployed youth in paid internships in companies across the country.\n\nQ1: Did we record an inflow of foreign direct investment to R17 billion in 2017 ?\nA1: Data from the UN Conference on Trade and Development shows that US$1.325 billion of foreign money was invested in South Africa in 2017. This is about R17.3 billion at the 30 June 2017 exchange rate. This claim is correct.\n\nQ2: Does South Africa ranks 82 out of 190 countries on ease of doing business ?\nA2: South Africa was ranked 82nd with a score of 66.03 in 2018 by World Bank.\nThe report says high-ranking countries are those that have consistently well designed business regulation or whose regulatory environments have thrived thanks to comprehensive reform over the years\n\nQ3: Was more than R1.3 trillion invested in infrastructure within five years in South Africa by 2019 ?\nA3: Some R1.26 trillion was spent on infrastructure in the last five financial years, according to numbers from the national treasury. So this claim is mostly true as about 1.26 were invested and nit 1.3 trillion.\n\nQ4: Was more than R1.3 trillion invested to build new homes in South Africa within five years ?\nA4: Public housing is included in the national treasury’s definition of public-sector infrastructure spending.\nAccording to the department of human settlements, close to 500,000 homes, or housing units, were delivered in the past five financial years. This claim is correct.\n\nQ5: Has South Africa launched the Youth Employment Service ?\nA5: It is correct that South Africa has launched the Youth Employment Service, which is placing unemployed youth in paid internships in companies across the country.The Youth Employment Service initiative was launched on 27 March 2018 with the aim of creating a million jobs for young people using innovation and technological best practice.\n\nQ6: Is 17.5 million social grants\nprovided to South Africans every month ?\nA6: The South African Social Security Agency administers social grants. Its most recent data on grants is from December 2018, when 17,731,402 social grants were paid.\n\nQ7: Did over 700,000 children acessed early childhood education last year ?\nA7: Using data from Statistics South Africa, Gustafsson estimates that 2,409,953 children were in some kind of pre-school in 2016.The 2017 general household survey reported that just over 2 million children under the age of four were attending a day care centre. Gustafsson adds that the existing underestimates may send the wrong signal to international investors about how seriously South Africa takes the education of its citizens. So, this verdict is downplayed.\n\nQ8: Were 2 new universities built in South Africa within 5 years by 2018 ?\nA8: In 2014, Sol Plaatje University in Kimberley, Northern Cape, and the University of Mpumalanga in Nelspruit opened their doors to students\n\nQ9: Was the Sanitation Appropriate For Education initiative launched in 2018 in South Africa ?\nA9: The Sanitation Appropriate For Education (Safe) initiative was launched on 14 August 2018.\n\nPartners in the project include the department of basic education, National Education Collaboration Trust and Nelson Mandela Foundation.\nIts main objective is to replace unsafe school toilet facilities - like pit latrines - with safe ones.\nThis claim is correct.\n\nQ10: Have safe and appropriate sanitation facilities provided in 699 schools in South Africa by 2018 ?\nA10: But it was difficult to independently verify the department’s numbers, two education-focused civil society organisations admits. This claim is unproven.\n\nQ11: Did Africa have 10 million tourists coming in a year by 2018 ?\nA11: In 2017 South Africa had 10,825,197 tourists, according to the agency. It had 10,044,163 tourists in 2016 and 8,903,773 in 2015.\nFull data for 2018 is not yet available but, from January to November 2018 there were 9,464,950 tourist arrivals, according to Stats SA’s tourism and migration report released in January 2019. This claim is unproven.\n\nQ12: How many unemployed youths have been placed under paid internships by the Youth Employment Service in South Africa\nA12: 50,000+ work experiences have been created",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Most of the q & a's are unrelated to the claim. There are 2 that relate to this claim and they show that South Africa have launched the scheme and has been successful so the claim is supported.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Over the past 5 years the SA government has invested more than R1.3 trillion in the country's infrastructure.\n\nQ1: How much money has the SA Government spent over the past 5 years on infrastructure?\nA1: Some R1.26 trillion was spent on infrastructure in the last five financial years, according to numbers from the national treasury.\n\nQ2: Is r1.26 trillion close to the r1.3 trillion in the claim?\nA2: it is .400 less but is close if rounded.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: R1.26 trillion was spent on infrastructure in the last five financial years, according to numbers from the national treasury.\n\n\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Every month 17.5 million social grants are provided to South Africans.\n\nQ1: How many Social grants are given out each month in South Africa?\nA1: Financial year\tNumber of grants\n2017/18\t17,509,995\n2016/17\t17,200,525\n2015/16\t16,991,634\n2014/13\t16,642,643\n2013/14\t15,932,473\n\nQ2: What do latest figures show were the number of social grants given out per month prior to the claim date?\nA2: SASSA (South African Social Security Agency) - Annual Report on Social Assistance 2018/2019\n\n- Table 3: Total Number of Social Grants from Type - April 2018 to March 2019 \n\n2018 (End of Month Figures)\nApril - 17 539 239\nMay - 17 568 861\nJune - 17 568 982\nJuly - 17 602 234\nAugust - 17 620 241\nSeptember - 17 666 235\nOctober - 17 757 590\nNovember - 17 840 961\nDecember - 17,731,402\n\n2019 (Figures for Month of - )\nJanuary - 17 791 179\nFebruary - 17 865 381\nMarch - 17 811 745\n\nQ3: Are 17.5 million social grants are provided to South Africans?\nA3: Yes, because At least 17.5 million grants are provided to South Africans every month. If the monthly figures are rounded down or simplified to one monthly amount then '17.5 million' is a fair account, in order to summarise this expenditure.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: At least 17m5 million social grants are provided ery month \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: If Donald Trump is successful in dismantling the Affordable Care Act, there is no guarantee for people who have pre-existing conditions.\n\nQ1: What was the affordable act all about\nA1: Affordable Care Act prevented insurance companies from excluding patients with pre-existing conditions through multiple provisions.\n\nQ2: What does the law state in terms of excluding patients with pre-existing conditions?\nA2: A group health plan and a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage may not impose any preexisting condition exclusion with respect to such plan or coverage.\n\nQ3: Can insurers charge older people more?\nA3: Insurance companies may charge older policyholders more, but they are not permitted to charge them more than three times as much as a policyholder who is 21 years old.\n\nQ4: Does Donald Trump support the Affordable Care Act?\nA4: No, because The Trump administration on Monday said the entire Affordable Care Act should be struck down, in a dramatic reversal.\n\nQ5: What health care bill is Trump introducing?\nA5: American Health Care Act\n\nQ6: Does the American Health Care Act protect pre-existing conditions?\nA6: The Trump Administration’s decision not to defend key federal protections against\ninsurance company discrimination threatens more than 130 million people with pre-existing\nhealth conditions in the United States, including 10 million people who obtain coverage through\nthe individual market. If the Trump Administration is successful in effectively eliminating the\nguaranteed issue provision, the community rating provision, and the coverage exclusion\nprohibition, insurance companies once again will be able to increase premiums and deny\ncoverage altogether based on gender, age, and pre-existing health conditions.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The American Health Care Act introduced by Trump to replace the Affordable Care Act can not protect people who have pre-existing conditions.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: There is a possibility that this poisonous gas could have been released by any neighboring country which is afraid of us\n\nQ1: Pakistan May Have ‘Released Poison Gas’ Over Polluted New Delhi?\nA1: A traffic policeman wears a mask to protect himself from air pollution at a junction during restrictions on private vehicles based on registration plates, on a smoggy morning in New Delhi, India, November 4, 2019. REUTERS/Danish Siddiqui\n\nQ2: What is the cause of this supposed poisonous gas\nA2: The air pollution crisis is now an annual tradition in Delhi at this time of year, owing to a toxic mixture of smoke from celebration firecrackers, the burning of crop stubble by farmers in the neighbouring regions of Punjab and Haryana, and a cold shift in temperatures locking in the fumes.\n\nQ3: What city is the most polluted city in 2018\nA3: New Delhi was the world’s most polluted capital city in 2018, two groups monitoring air pollution said on Tuesday in a study of the amount of fine particulate matter known as PM2.5 in 61 capital cities around the world.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: no evidence in the answers suggests this is true.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The UK will send Trump £500 million a week in a trade deal that will fund US drug firms instead of NHS.\n\nQ1: Is the deal between the US and the UK going to affect the NHS\nA1: No, because A trade deal would not have the power to stop the NHS being a free, universal service\n\nQ2: Was there an agreed upon amount that was going to be paid to the US drug agencies instead of the NHS\nA2: In a statement to Dispatches, the Department for International Trade said: “The NHS is not, and never will be, for sale to the private sector, whether overseas or domestic…The sustainability of the NHS is an absolute priority for the government. We could not agree to any proposals on medicines pricing or access that would put NHS finances at risk or reduce clinician and patient choice.”\n\nQ3: Could a trade deal with the US leave the NHS with a bill for billions?\nA3: A trade deal with America might leave the NHS footing a bill for billions,\n\nQ4: Was a drug firm trade deal in place with the US at the time of the claim ?\nA4: No, because Donald Trump told a press conference in London that the NHS could form part of a future trade deal between the UK and the United States",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Donald Trump told a press conference in London that the NHS could form part of a future trade deal between the UK and the United States. There was no mention of £500 million funds to be sent by The UK. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: U.S. aid dollars sent to Ukraine under Biden’s supervision went toward Burisma, where Biden’s son Hunter was a board member.\n\nQ1: Did the USA send aid to Ukraine whilst Joe Biden was vice president.\nA1: The United States disbursed about $1.28 billion to Ukraine between 2014 and 2016\n\nQ2: Was Hunter Biden a board member of Ukrainian energy company 'Burisma'\nA2: Hunter Biden was appointed to the board of Burisma.\n\nQ3: Did hunter Biden use his position to secure US government funds for energy company burisma?\nA3: Ukraine’s top prosecutor said his office is reviewing several cases related to the owner of a gas company where the son of former Vice President Joe Biden sat on the board, but he added that he wasn’t aware of any evidence of wrongdoing by either Joe or Hunter Biden.\n\nQ4: Is there proof that U.S. aid money went to Burisma?\nA4: No answer could be found.\n\nQ5: Did Burisma receive U.S. funds?\nA5: No answer could be found.\n\nQ6: Is there a Burisma legal case regarding Hunter Biden?\nA6: No, because Ukrainian officials say the inquiry into alleged improprieties at Burisma has never been completely closed.\n\n“The Burisma case is still there; it’s up and down,” a senior Ukrainian official said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters. “But the Burisma case and a Hunter Biden case are totally different things, and the latter simply does not exist.”",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There is nothing to prove that the aid went through Burisma \n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Americans in swing states do not want to hear about the impeachment of Donald Trump in 2019.\n\nQ1: What does the FiveThirtyeight impeachment poll tracker report?\nA1: 50.4% support beginning the impeachment process, while 41.2% do not; and 48.1% say Trump should be impeached or impeached and removed, while 44.6% don’t support that.\n\nQ2: What is a swing state?\nA2: Swing states, which are also called purple states or battleground states, are states that don't lean toward one particular party.\n\nQ3: Do swing states in the US oppose or support Donald Trumps impeachment?\nA3: Notably, though, that same poll shows that while a majority does not support removing Trump via impeachment, about the same percentage, 51%, supports the impeachment inquiry being conducted by the House (44% oppose it). That contradicts Trump’s claim that most “don’t want to hear about it” and don’t want to “talk about it.”",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: 50 percent support the impeachment process, and 48 percent say trump should be removed, which shows that they do want to hear about the impeachment process. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Indian social activist Mahatma Gandhi once said, “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”\n\nQ1: Where is the earliest match of these words being used?\nA1: Indeed, the website Quote Investigator found the earliest “substantive” match in a speech Klein delivered at an Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America conference that year.\n\n“And, my friends, in this story you have a history of this entire movement,” Klein said during the address. “First they ignore you. Then they ridicule you. And then they attack you and want to burn you. And then they build monuments to you.”\n\nQ2: Can this quote be attributed to Gandhi?\nA2: No, because Yet, while Gandhi is highly quotable, the Daily Caller News Foundation found no evidence that the quote originated with him. A search of the Gandhi Heritage Portal’s archive, which contains 100 volumes of original documents related to Gandhi, turned up no results.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The credible sources do not show any evidence that Gandhi said those words. The first answer shows a similar quote in 1919. Therefore the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Over 200,000 NHS nurses have resigned since 2010.\n\nQ1: How many nurses have voluntary resigned from 2010-2018?\nA1: Over the eight years from 2010 to 2018, just under 97,000 of the 200,000 nurses and health visitors had ‘voluntary resignation’ recorded as a reason for leaving.\n\nQ2: Does the NHS now have 200,000 fewer nurses than in 2010?\nA2: No, because In June 2018, there were around 2,700 more nurses and health visitors (full-time equivalent) working for the NHS than in June 2010 (a 1% increase).\n\nQ3: Is the figure quoted of 200,000 just for resignations?\nA3: No, because Over the eight years Labour looked at, just under 97,000 of the 200,000 nurses and health visitors had ‘voluntary resignation’ recorded as a reason for leaving—the single most common reason for leaving.\n\nIn the year to June 2011, 50% of nursing staff who had a reason for leaving recorded, voluntarily resigned. By the year ending June 2018, this had increased to 63%.\n\nIn total, around a third of voluntary resignations between June 2010 and 2018 did not have a specific reason for them recorded. Around a quarter were listed as being due to relocation and around one in five cited ‘work life balance’. Just under one in ten resigned for reasons relating to promotion.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: 97k not 200k\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The Information and Communication Technology sector contributes more to Nigeria’s Gross Domestic Product than the Oil and Gas sector.\n\nQ1: How much does the Information and Communication Technology sector contribute to Nigeria’s Gross Domestic Product?\nA1: Information and Communications Technology’s (ICT) contribution to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of 13.8%\n\nQ2: How much does the Oil and Gas sector contribute to Nigeria’s Gross Domestic Product?\nA2: Oil and Gas contribution of 8.8%",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answers and sources clearly show that the ICT sector does bring in more GDP so the claim is supported.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: This is the first health-care plan in the U.S. proposed by anyone in this presidential primary that lays out the full cost and how to pay for it.\n\nQ1: What are the full costs that Elizabeth Warren has put forward in her health care plan?\nA1: new federal spending of approximately $20.5 trillion over the 2020-2029 budget\nwindow\n\nQ2: What are the ways in which the health care plan would be paid for as laid out by Elizabeth Warren?\nA2: 1. Employer Medicare Contribution\n2.Additional Take-Home Pay Subject to Existing Taxes\n3. Taxes on the Financial Sector, Large Corporations, and the Top 1% of Individuals\n4.Better Enforcement of Existing Tax Laws\n5.Immigration Reform\n6.Elimination of the Overseas Contingency Operations Fund\n\nQ3: Have there been presidential campaigns where the health plan has been less detailed than Elizabeth Warren's plan?\nA3: Yes, because Letter from the 2008 Barack Obama campaign about the Health Care Plan is less detailed.\n\nQ4: What is the estimated amount for Medicare-for-all spending?\nA4: While we are not aware of any estimates of this particular proposal, similar proposals have been estimated to cost the federal government roughly $28-32 trillion over a decade.\n\nQ5: How did Elizabeth Warren's opponents in the 2019-20 presidential primaries present their healthcare plans?\nA5: Bernie Sanders' document presented a number of options to begin a discussion about the best way of financing Medicare-for-all.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: it does seem this health care plan is detailed about full costs and pay \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: 35 million votes were counted in the October 21, 2019 Canadian federal elections although Canada only has 27.4 million eligible voters.\n\nQ1: What was the population of Canada in 2019\nA1: 37.6 million\n\nQ2: What was the total number of eligible voters in the Canadian 2019 election\nA2: 27.4 million\n\nQ3: How many ballots were printed\nA3: 35 million\n\nQ4: How many eligible voters voted in the 2019 Canadian elections\nA4: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: the number of votes counted in the elections was 18 million not 35 million\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: BBC producer Rob Burley hired his son to pose as a Brexit & Boris Johnson supporter on Question Time.\n\nQ1: Who is Rob Burley?\nA1: The Andrew Marr Show editor Rob Burley and live political programmes editor for the BBC whch includes responsibility for the Daily Politics, Sunday Politics, This Week, Westminster Hour and Newswatch programmes.\n\nQ2: Who is the editor of Question Time?\nA2: Hilary O'Neil",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The Q&A pairs indicate that the job title of the entity shown in the claim does not match that of the claim, They also show the entity is not associated with the political BBC program shown in the query, So the claim looks to be false.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Drinking Cold Water After Meals Can Cause Cancer\n\nQ1: Can drinking cold water cause cancer?\nA1: Cold water is not listed as a possible cause of cancer by the NIC.\n\nQ2: Is drinking cold water after a meal bad for you?\nA2: Whether consumed during or before meals, liquids play several important roles in the digestion process.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Water is not a known cause of cancer.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: United States Republican Matt Gaetz has had numerous DUIs and his dad, a Florida State senator, got him off each time,\n\nQ1: How many DUI's had Matt Gaetz recieved by the time of the claim?\nA1: One in 2008\n\nQ2: What was the outcome of the 2008 DUI Gaetz received and was there any evidence that his father was involved in the outcome?\nA2: According to an article by Tampa Bay Times, - He didn't have his license suspended for a year when he refused the breath test — as Florida law dictates. And he didn't have that refusal used against him in a criminal proceeding. Charges against Gaetz were dismissed after events that included, among other things, the forced resignation of the arresting officer. No evidence was put forward that Gaetz’s “dad got him off.”",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Matt Gaetz has had only one DUI and not numerous as the claim suggests \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Democrats in the USA have issued more subpoenas than they’ve passed bills.\n\nQ1: How many democrat subpoenas were issued at time of claim ?\nA1: 56\n\nQ2: How many democrat house bills were passed at time of claim ?\nA2: 46",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Numerical proof.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The World Health Organization is still pushing this [MMR vaccine] depopulation agenda throughout Africa\n\nQ1: What is MMR vaccine?\nA1: MMR is vaccine against measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR)\n\nQ2: Does MMR reduce fertility?\nA2: No answer could be found.\n\nQ3: What is the rate of deaths caused by MMR vaccine?\nA3: There is no evidence that MMR vaccine causes death but the VAERS report has some deaths listed although the website has a disclaimer that VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness.\n\nQ4: What type of vaccine does the claim refer to?\nA4: MMR vaccine against measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR)\n\nQ5: Is there a MMR vaccine rollout in Africa in October 2019 as claimed?\nA5: Yes, because WHO Regional Director for Africa. “This new vaccination campaign aims to protect children''",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The Q&As show that the MMR vaccine is being used in Africa, but there is no evidence that it causes death or depopulation and is shown to protect children. So the claim is refuted. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: US President Donald Trump's administration built the greatest economy in history.\n\nQ1: How is a country's economic health measured?\nA1: One way in which economists measure the performance of an economy is by looking at a widely used measure of total output called gross domestic product (GDP).\n\nQ2: What was the job creation growth during Trump's administration?\nA2: Obama created 1.6 million more jobs than Trump over a three-year period.\n\n\nPresident Trump’s best year of job growth was 2.314 million in 2018 (the first year of the tax cut) but it falls short of any of Obama’s last three years.\n\nQ3: What the overall employment rate like under Trump's administration?\nA3: ...the unemployment rate fell to 8.4 percent as the country emerged from pandemic lockdowns, but the data shows the recovery is losing steam.\n\nNearly a quarter of the August employment gains were in government jobs, particularly temporary work for the 2020 census, and employment in the world's largest economy remains 11.5 million positions or 7.6 percent below the level in February, before the coronavirus pandemic struck.\n\nQ4: What was the overall GDP growth under Trump's administration?\nA4: His boasts also don’t stand up when you peel the onion on GDP growth and realize that the Federal deficits during his Presidency will exceed any that were not impacted by a recession.\n\nQ5: Did the US Federal Reserve comment on the US economy at the time of the claim?\nA5: Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said in an article published on September 4, 2020:\n\"We think that the economy's going to need low interest rates, which support economic activity, for an extended period of time,\" he said. \"It will be measured in years.\"",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answers and sources show that Donald Trump's administration did not build the greatest US economy as Obama's administration did better than Trumps. Therefore the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The Conservatives plan to take on 6,000 more police officers in 12 months at a cost of £750 million.\n\nQ1: how many police officers do the conservatives plan to take on?\nA1: The Home Office has today confirmed the officer recruitment targets for every police force in England and Wales for the first year of the unprecedented drive to increase their ranks by 20,000 over the next 3 years.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Home Secretary Priti Patel made the statement that Government funding ( £750 million ) for recruitment in 2020 to 2021 will cover all associated costs, including training and kit.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: More than 500 scientists and professionals in climate and related fields have sent a \"European Climate Declaration\" to the Secretary-General of the United Nations.\n\nQ1: How many of the 500 signatures are scientists?\nA1: Amber Kerr, Researcher, Agricultural Sustainability Institute, University of California, Davis:\nWhile reviewing the claims related to agriculture, I noted that only 26 out of the 506 signatories (5%) were professionals in biology, ecology, or environmental science. I suspect that the vast majority of signatories had little direct knowledge or understanding of this part of the petition that they signed.\n\nQ2: What were the prevalent fields of expertise within the signatures?\nA2: The most prevalent groups of signatories were geologists (19%) and engineers (21%)—many of whom were implicitly or explicitly involved in fossil energy extraction. Most of the rest were physicists, chemists, and mathematicians.\n\nQ3: How many signatures were not scientists?\nA3: 11.3%\n\nQ4: Were there any signatories with credentials?\nA4: Yes, because “Peter Champness, Radiologist, Australia”; “Patrick Mellett, architect and CEO”; and “Fintan Ryan, Retired Senior Airline Captain” (to say nothing of the dozens and dozens of fossil fuel employees)\n\nQ5: How many of the signatories are scientists?\nA5: Amber Kerr, Researcher, Agricultural Sustainability Institute, University of California, Davis:\nWhile reviewing the claims related to agriculture, I noted that only 26 out of the 506 signatories (5%) were professionals in biology, ecology, or environmental science. I suspect that the vast majority of signatories had little direct knowledge or understanding of this part of the petition that they signed.\n\nQ6: What did the media report about the claim that more than 500 scientists and professionals in climate and related fields have sent a 'European Climate Declaration' to the Secretary-General of the United Nations.?\nA6: The Washington Times - Sunday, September 29, 2019 published an article on the event.\n\nScientists tell U.N. Global Climate Summit: No emergency\n\nClimate Intelligence Foundation calls for UN meeting with experts from both sides of debate\n\n ....last week’s U.N. Global Climate Summit were the 500 international scientists, engineers and other stakeholders sounding a very different message: “There is no climate emergency.”\n\nThe signers asked Mr. Guterres to place the declaration on the UN’s agenda for the meeting ending Monday—which hasn’t happened—and organize a meeting of scientists “on both sides of the climate debate early in 2020.”\n\nQ7: Who was responsible for the declaration letter?\nA7: The European Climate Declaration was spearheaded by the Amsterdam-based Climate Intelligence Foundation [CLINTEL].\n\nQ8: What credibility has been placed on the declaration?\nA8: The letter has been criticized by six scientists who claim that its credibility is very low. One complaint is that most of the 500 are not experts in \"climate science.\"",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Evidence shows that the 500 aren't even experts in climate change and according to a source the credibility is low \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Labour have committed to hire 10,000 police officers at a cost of £3 billion.\n\nQ1: How much did Labour estimate the cost of the 10,000 additional police officers would be?\nA1: Labour’s figures show that in 2017-18 its police recruitment drive would cost £64.3m, £139.1m in 2018-19, £217.2m in 2019-20 and £298.8m in 2020-21, making a total of £771m or nearly £800m over the life of the next parliament.\n\nQ2: What will Labour's estimated funding go towards?\nA2: The cost will go towards salary costs and does not include the cost of hiring or training new officers.\n\nQ3: Has Labour committed to hiring 10,000 police officers at a cost of £3 billion?\nA3: No answer could be found.\n\nQ4: when was it this pledge done\nA4: 2017 manifesto",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: No answer could be found from the sources. \n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: EUPATORIUM PERFOIAM 200 can cure dengue in 48 hours.\n\nQ1: What is EUPATORIUM PERFOIAM 200?\nA1: The product does not exist. It is a mis-spelling of Eupatorium Perfoliatum 200.\nNO source URL is given by the article.\n\nQ2: Does Eupatorium Perfoliatum 200 Ch treat dengue fever?\nA2: Whilst the medicine exists. It is not clear if it is used to treat dengue fever.\n\nQ3: Can dengue fever be cured within 48 hours?\nA3: The treatment of the disease depends on its severity. Severe dengue could not be cured in 48 hrs.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Although the Q&A pair state the claim has a misspelling, the most likely candidate can still not cure dengue fever in 48 hours .\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: In Nigeria, stroke is the most common medical emergency in most hospitals.\n\nQ1: How common of a medical emergency is stroke in Kenya's hospitals?\nA1: A study of 200 unconscious adult patients at the University College Hospital in Ibadan from August 2004 to March 2005. A third of them were diagnosed with acute stroke,\n\nQ2: Is there any data on how common stroke is throughout Kenya's hospital system?\nA2: A study of 2,922 patients admitted into one accident and emergency department of the Federal Medical Centre in Ekiti state from January 2010 to December 2012. Heart failure was the leading cause of admission with 329 patients, followed by stroke with 283 patients\n\nQ3: Is a comprehensive survey available for stroke data in Kenya's hospitals?\nA3: No answer could be found.\n\nQ4: Is there any other small studies on stroke numbers in Kenya's hospitals?\nA4: A 2016 study to see if hospital admission after hours or over weekends resulted in higher death rates. Out of 339 patients, 55.7% (187) had suffered a stroke. But the 339 patients accounted for 34.5% of all admissions in the study period.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The evidence does not include a comprehensive survey on stroke data in Kenya's hospitals. There have been small studies that found stroke to be one of the leading medical emergencies; however, without a comprehensive survey, we cannot be sure whether this claim is supported or not. \n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Texas, US school district mandate teaches kids how to have anal sex.\n\nQ1: is there any mention of Anal sex on the Human sexuality and responsibility education program that is provided to schools in the district?\nA1: No, because Only in that 5th graders would be told how to identify body parts including the anus.\n\nQ2: What is the sex ed program the claim refers to?\nA2: The Human Sexuality & Responsibility Curriculum at Austin school district Texas.\n\nQ3: Is Anal sex on the Human sexuality and responsibility education program in the Texas school district that is provided to its schools?\nA3: No, because 5th graders would only be told how to identify body parts which includes the anus in the educational program.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Q2 confirms that 5th graders would only be told how to identify body parts, which includes the anus, in the educational program. Hence, this claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Indira Gandhi offered nuclear technology to Pakistan.\n\nQ1: What year is Indira Gandhi accused of offering nuclear technology to Pakistan?\nA1: 1974\n\nQ2: Who was Indira Gandhi in 1974?\nA2: Indira Gandhi (1917-1984) served as India's first female prime minister from 1966 to 1977 and again from 1980 until her assassination\n\nQ3: Did Indira Gandhi offer to sharre nuclear technology 'only' with Pakistan in 1974?\nA3: No, because In a report to India's parliament she explained that India is willing to share her nuclear technology with Pakistan in the same way she is willing to share it with other countries,\n\nQ4: Was Indira Gandhi willing to share India's nuclear technology with Pakistan?\nA4: Yes, because She stated in a parlementry report that India is willing to share her nuclear technology with Pakistan\n\nQ5: What did Indira Gandhi say with regards to sharing nuculear info with Pakistan?\nA5: SHE RECALLED HER LETTER TO\nBHUTTO EXPLAINING THE PEACEFUL NATURE AND ECONOMIC\nPURPOSE OF THE EXPLOSION AND OFFERING TO SHARE NUCLEAR\nTECHNOLOGY WITH PAKISTAN UNDER PROPER CONDITIONS.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Indira Gandhi explained that India is willing to share its nuclear technology with Pakistan in the same way she is willing to share it with other countries. Hence, it wasn't solely \"Pakistan\" and under \"proper conditions.\"\n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Viral Photos show new coins minted for a paperless currency in the Philippines\n\nQ1: Are new coins being minted for a paperless currency in the Philippines?\nA1: A review of the Philippine central bank’s official website shows the coins were minted as new generation and commemorative coins.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The minted coins were commemorative coins and not for a paperless currency\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Islamic State (IS) “doesn’t exist anymore,\n\nQ1: Has the killing of IS leaders in the past prevented the growth of the organization\nA1: No, after the killing of the successor in 2010 Baghdadi was named the new Caliph and he rallied new troops again\n\nQ2: Is IS only linked to Syria and Iraq\nA2: IS also claimed twin blasts in the Lebanese capital Beirut which killed at least 41 people. Militants from the Lebanese movement Hezbollah have been fighting in neighbouring Syria on the side of IS' enemy, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.\n\nAnd then on 13 November, at least 128 people were killed in a wave of attacks around Paris. IS said it was behind the violence - French President Francois Hollande described it as \"an act of war\".",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The source and answer show that Islamic state does still exist so the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Obama tweeted on Al Baghdad \"he was a great man, an innocent man and my friend\".\n\nQ1: Where did the claim originate from\nA1: Obama Watcher\n\nQ2: What kind of website is Obama Watcher\nA2: The site has. \"Obamawatcher.com is a subsidiary of the “America’s Last Line of Defense” network of parody, satire, and tomfoolery, or as Snopes called it before they lost their war on satire: Junk News\". on their about us page",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The claim comes from a satire site, which does not post real factual news. So the claim is not true. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Kenyan revenue has been under-performing for the last 10 years.\n\nQ1: Has Kenya consistently fallen short on tax revenue targets since 2010?\nA1: Treasury documents show this was correct for ordinary revenue for at least nine and possible all years. In one financial year, 2010/11, differing official data makes both underperformance or overperformance possible.\n\nQ2: Does the Kenya Revenue Authority's report show a negative figure for each of the last ten years? Indicating that the revenue target was missed?\nA2: Yes. Although the 2010/11 figure gives 2 versions of the actual revenue - only 1 version gives a negative figure but this would still indicate the revenue target was missed.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: this is mostly true, with underperformance for ordinary revenue, recorded in at least 9 of the years. \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Cambridge University Student Union (CUSU) banned Remembrance Day celebrations remembering British war veterans.\n\nQ1: What did Cambridge Universitys student union say about the claim?\nA1: No, we did not ban poppies or Remembrance Day at Cambridge University…\n\nCUSU would carry on as it always had in its Remembrance Day commemorations. This includes having the CUSU President lay a wreath as part of the Cambridge Remembrance Day commemorations and continuing to encourage individual students to commemorate Remembrance Day in any way they feel appropriate, which is consistent with Royal British Legion recommendations.\n\nQ2: Did CUSU vote down a Remembrance Sunday motion?\nA2: On the agenda was a motion put forward by two non-voting students, to ask Council to promote Remembrance Day actively across the whole student body, as a way of remembering British war veterans. An amended motion was also proposed which deleted various phrases of the original motion, as per standard practice, in order to include all those affected by war. In deciding which of the two motions to take forward for a final vote, the amended motion was selected. However, and contrary to many reports in the media, the amended motion was then defeated by a huge margin with only three votes in favour.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: It seems that the celebrations were not banned, therefore the claim is refuted\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Kathy Griffin, Tom Arnold, Robert DeNiro and Barbara Streisand have had U.S federal warrants issued for threats against President Donald Trump.\n\nQ1: who made this claim\nA1: Taters Gonna Tate\n\nQ2: what sort of website is taters gonna tate\nA2: Tatersgonnatate.com is a subsidiary of the “America’s Last Line of Defense” network of parody, satire, and tomfoolery, or as Snopes called it before they lost their war on satire: Junk News",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: As the information in the claim was published in a publication which is described as network of parody, satire, and tomfoolery, it cannot be verified as true.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: 90,000 Californians are unsheltered and homeless.\n\nQ1: What is the definition of homeless?\nA1: Homeless describes a person who lacks a fixed,\nregular, and adequate nighttime residence.\n\nQ2: What is the definition of Unsheltered Homelessness?\nA2: Unsheltered Homelessness refers to people\nwhose primary nighttime location is a public or\nprivate place not designated for, or ordinarily\nused as, a regular sleeping accommodation for\npeople (for example, the streets, vehicles, or\nparks).\n\nQ3: How many unsheltered homeless were recorded in 2018 in California?\nA3: 89,543 people in California were unsheltered and homeless according to the 2018 Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR) to Cong\n\nQ4: How many unsheltered homeless were recorded in 2019 in California?\nA4: 108,432 people in California were reported unsheltered and homeless in the 2019 2019 AHAR: Part 1 - PIT Estimates of Homelessness in the U.S.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: 90,000 californians are unsheltered or homeless, rising to over a 100,000 in 2019\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: A majority of UK voters say violence against MPs is “worth it” to get their way in Brexit.\n\nQ1: What survey does the claim reference?\nA1: Findings from a 2019 Future of England Survey, conducted by YouGov\n\nQ2: Does the survey ask if violence against MP's is a price worth paying for Brexit?\nA2: Yes, because The majority of Remain voters across all three countries thought that violence towards MPs was a ‘price worth paying’ to Remain\n\nQ3: Did the survey ask people if violence against 'MPs specifically' was a price worth paying?\nA3: No, because the survey only gave respondents three simplistic answers to choose from:\n\n- “I want this to happen regardless of Brexit”\n- “I see it as a risk but it’s worth it”;\nand \n- “[leaving/remaining in the EU] is not worth the risk of this happening”.\n\nQ4: The source of the claim is said to be the results of a survey conducted by a Cardiff university. What was the point of the survey?\nA4: Among the questions posed, representative samples of electorates in each country were asked what they would be willing to see happen to get their way on Brexit. \n\nThe researchers have been asking people’s views on this topic since the historic vote three years ago. \n\n A range of scenarios were put to respondents and they were asked to state whether each one was a ‘price worth paying’ or ‘not worth paying’ to either Leave the EU or to Remain.\n\nQ5: There are the two questions in the poll using the words\n\n\"being a price worth paying or not worth paying?\"\n\nin connection with \n\n\"Violence directed towards Members of Parliament\"\n\nHow are they worded?\nA5: Some have suggested that **leaving the\nEuropean Union** might present challenges\nto the UK but others disagree, labelling this\nas Project Fear. For each of the following\nplease tell us whether you think this would\nbe a price worth paying or not worth paying\nfor Brexit?\n\nQ6: What were the 2019 results for Violence directed towards Members of Parliament:\nLeaving the European Union?\nA6: WaIes:\n\nI want this to happen regardless of Brexit - 6 %\n \nI see it as a risk but it’s worth it to take back control - 40 %\n\nLeaving the EU is not worth the risk of this happening - 54 %\n\nQ7: What were the 2019 results for Violence directed towards Members of Parliament:\n\nstopping Brexit\nand **remaining in the EU** ?\nA7: Wales:\n\nI want this to happen regardless of Brexit - 8%\n\nI see it as a risk but it’s worth it to remain in the EU - 39%\n\nStaying in the EU is not worth the risk of this happening - 53%",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Majority of UK do not want violence as seen in the results\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Actress Shaina Magdayao, Died at the Age of 30 Because of Hypothyroid Disease\n\nQ1: Was Actress Shaina Magdayao alive when the claim was made (24th OCT 2019)?\nA1: Yes, because Actress Shaina Magdayao broke her social media hiatus after false news about her passing went gone viral online by posting \n“Im baaaccckkk! Or should I say, I’m A L I I I I VE,”\non her Instagram account.\n\nQ2: Has Filipino actress Shaina Magdayao died at the age of 20?\nA2: No, because Shaina Magdayao confirmed on her Instagram account on the 25th of October 2019 that she was very much alive. She said, \n\n“Im baaaccckkk! Or should I say, I’m A L I I I I VE and oh so ready for SCORP SEASON and my 30th!!!”\n\nQ3: When was the claim made?\nA3: 24/10/2019",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Shaina magdayo was alive and even took to her social media platform to refute the fake news \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Lakshmi Vilas Bank shuts down 569 branches and 1046 ATMs\n\nQ1: Did Lakshmi Vilas Bank shut down branches and ATMs in 2019?\nA1: No answer could be found.\n\nQ2: Did Lakshmi Vilas Bank send a complaint to the cyber crime unit of Chennai police about the facebook posts which said they were closing 569 branches and 1046 ATMs?\nA2: Yes. Part of the statement said: Messages posted by the accused are false and done with a malfide intention to cause serious damage to the reputation and goodwill of the bank among the persons having transactions with the bank and also the general public, investors and all other stakeholders.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Complaint was sent to the police that the claim was false.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: US Red flag laws allow gun seizure without a judge's ok.\n\nQ1: What is a red flag law?\nA1: An Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO), also known as a red flag law, is an order from a judge that suspends a person’s license to possess or carry a gun.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: From the Q&A it seems that the judge must make the order, so the claim is incorrect. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Four U.S Republicans, Will Hurd of Texas, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Fred Upton of Michigan and Susan Brooks of Indiana voted to have President Donald Trump impeached.\n\nQ1: When was this claim made?\nA1: 22/10/2019\n\nQ2: When were the impeachment proceedings against Donald Trump initiated?\nA2: 24/09/2019\n\nQ3: When were the impeachment proceedings against Trump formalised?\nA3: 31/10/2019\n\nQ4: Has there been a house vote to impeach Trump?\nA4: There has, however, been no House vote to impeach the president to date, making it impossible for the four Republicans mentioned in the Facebook post to have voted in favor of such a motion. In fact, the House only just passed a resolution formalizing the procedures of the impeachment inquiry into Trump on Oct. 31.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: no House vote to impeach the president to date, making it impossible for the four Republicans mentioned in the Facebook post to have voted in favor of such a motion. In fact, the House only just passed a resolution formalizing the procedures of the impeachment inquiry into Trump on Oct. 31.\n\n\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The WHO said that the Polio vaccine is responsible for the return of Polio in the Philippines.\n\nQ1: What did the WHO say was responsible for the return of Polio in the Philippines\nA1: low vaccination rates had caused cases of vaccine-derived polio\n\nQ2: What kind of Polio is circulating in the Philippines recently\nA2: A circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 1",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: low vaccination rates had caused cases of vaccine-derived polio\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Cream Of Tartar Mixed With Orange Juice Will Help You Quit Smoking.\n\nQ1: Is cream of tartar safe to drink according to experts?\nA1: Ingestion of cream of tartar can potentially result in life-threatening hyperkalemia.\n\nQ2: Is there any scientific proof found that Cream of Tatar and orange juice help stop you smoking?\nA2: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There is no evidence in the QAs that would suggest that cream of tartar could help with quitting smoking. Therefore, the claim is refuted\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Thomas Jefferson said, “When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty.”\n\nQ1: Where can the Thomas Jefferson Foundation be found?\nA1: Monticello\n\nQ2: Is the quote “When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty\" contained in the papers or speeches of Thomas Jefferson?\nA2: We have not found any evidence that Thomas Jefferson said or wrote, \"When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny,\" nor any evidence that he wrote its listed variations.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: It seems from the Q&as that there is no proof anywhere that Thomas Jefferson made this comment. So the claim is refuted. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Mombasa is Kenya’s oldest town.\n\nQ1: Which Kenyan town is the oldest?\nA1: Lamu is the country’s oldest living town and is situated on Lamu Island off the coast of Africa.\n\nQ2: How far does Lamu town date back?\nA2: In the East African coast, Lamu is among the region’s most ancient Swahili\nsettlements, some of which dates to as far back as the 8th Century AD. Manda\ntown ruins for instance, a short distance away from Lamu has been dated by\narchaeologists to be a 9th Century town.\n\nQ3: How far does Mombasa town date back?\nA3: Mombasa to early 1000s CE",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The oldest living town is Lamu. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Life expectancy in Kenya has increased to 67 years currently.\n\nQ1: Has average life expectancy in Kenya concurrently increased to 67 years?\nA1: Kenya's life expectancy has been improving from a low of 46.36 in 1960 to 61.6 years in 2014.\n\nQ2: Has kenya's life expectancy risen from 2014 till 2019?\nA2: If we look at the change in life expectancy in Kenya over the past several years, we find that it is higher now than in 2019, when it was 66.7 years",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: This is correct, the life expectancy has risen to around 67 years. \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Mombasa is Kenya’s oldest town.\n\nQ1: How old is Mombasa?\nA1: It is unlcear however, the first mention of Mombasa by name was 1154.\n\nQ2: Are there any old towns in Kenya?\nA2: Manda settlement dates back to 600ce to 1500ce",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: From both the question and answer pairs, it seems that the settlement monda is older than Mombasa. Therefore, the claim is refuted\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The Kenyatta administration has more than doubled the volume of cleared cargo passing through Kilindini, Mombasa's main port, annually.”\n\nQ1: Does The Kenyatta administration has more than doubled the volume of cleared cargo passing through Kilindini, Mombasa's main port, annually?\nA1: Statistics bureau data shows 41% increase, not over 100%",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Q&A pair are worded poorley but doe give an answer of 41% not 100% increase\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Kenyan President Kenyatta in national day speech stated Our life expectancy [has increased] from 35 years at independence\n\nQ1: What was Kenya's life expectancy in 1963\nA1: 48 years\n\nQ2: What was the life expectancy of Kenya in 2019\nA2: 67 years",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The math seems to be a bit wrong. The actual number is smaller therefore the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: US White House did not withhold security aid to Ukraine, in part, because the administration wanted Ukraine to investigate Democrats and the 2016 election.\n\nQ1: Why did the US white house withhold security aid to Ukraine\nA1: On July 18, 2019, the Trump administration withheld $250 million of military aid to Ukraine. Seven days later, Trump held a phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, during which he asked Zelensky to work with Rudy Giuliani and U.S. Attorney General William Barr to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: On July 18, 2019, the Trump administration withheld $250 million of military aid to Ukraine. Seven days later, Trump held a phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, during which he asked Zelensky to work with Rudy Giuliani and U.S. Attorney General William Barr to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
Subsets and Splits