prev1
stringlengths
1
7.9k
prev2
stringlengths
1
7.9k
next1
stringlengths
1
7.9k
next2
stringlengths
1
7.9k
is_boundary
bool
2 classes
session_id
stringlengths
7
14
So it 's i All the noises are from the TI - digits ,
Yeah.
right ? So you i
Um They k uh
false
QMSum_194
Yeah.
right ? So you i
Um They k uh
Well , it it 's like the high mismatch of the SpeechDat - Car after cleaning up , maybe having more noise than the the training set of TIMIT after clean s after you do the noise clean - up.
false
QMSum_194
right ? So you i
Um They k uh
Well , it it 's like the high mismatch of the SpeechDat - Car after cleaning up , maybe having more noise than the the training set of TIMIT after clean s after you do the noise clean - up.
Mmm.
false
QMSum_194
Um They k uh
Well , it it 's like the high mismatch of the SpeechDat - Car after cleaning up , maybe having more noise than the the training set of TIMIT after clean s after you do the noise clean - up.
Mmm.
I mean , earlier you never had any compensation , you just trained it straight away.
false
QMSum_194
Well , it it 's like the high mismatch of the SpeechDat - Car after cleaning up , maybe having more noise than the the training set of TIMIT after clean s after you do the noise clean - up.
Mmm.
I mean , earlier you never had any compensation , you just trained it straight away.
Mm - hmm.
false
QMSum_194
Mmm.
I mean , earlier you never had any compensation , you just trained it straight away.
Mm - hmm.
So it had like all these different conditions of S N Rs , actually in their training set of neural net.
false
QMSum_194
I mean , earlier you never had any compensation , you just trained it straight away.
Mm - hmm.
So it had like all these different conditions of S N Rs , actually in their training set of neural net.
Mm - hmm. Mm - hmm.
false
QMSum_194
Mm - hmm.
So it had like all these different conditions of S N Rs , actually in their training set of neural net.
Mm - hmm. Mm - hmm.
But after cleaning up you have now a different set of S N Rs , right ?
false
QMSum_194
So it had like all these different conditions of S N Rs , actually in their training set of neural net.
Mm - hmm. Mm - hmm.
But after cleaning up you have now a different set of S N Rs , right ?
Yeah.
false
QMSum_194
Mm - hmm. Mm - hmm.
But after cleaning up you have now a different set of S N Rs , right ?
Yeah.
For the training of the neural net.
false
QMSum_194
But after cleaning up you have now a different set of S N Rs , right ?
Yeah.
For the training of the neural net.
Mm - hmm.
false
QMSum_194
Yeah.
For the training of the neural net.
Mm - hmm.
And is it something to do with the mismatch that that 's created after the cleaning up , like the high mismatch
false
QMSum_194
For the training of the neural net.
Mm - hmm.
And is it something to do with the mismatch that that 's created after the cleaning up , like the high mismatch
You mean the the most noisy occurrences on SpeechDat - Car might be a lot more noisy than
false
QMSum_194
Mm - hmm.
And is it something to do with the mismatch that that 's created after the cleaning up , like the high mismatch
You mean the the most noisy occurrences on SpeechDat - Car might be a lot more noisy than
Mm - hmm. Of that I mean , the SNR after the noise compensation of the SpeechDat - Car.
false
QMSum_194
And is it something to do with the mismatch that that 's created after the cleaning up , like the high mismatch
You mean the the most noisy occurrences on SpeechDat - Car might be a lot more noisy than
Mm - hmm. Of that I mean , the SNR after the noise compensation of the SpeechDat - Car.
Oh , so Right. So the training the the neural net is being trained with noise compensated stuff.
false
QMSum_194
You mean the the most noisy occurrences on SpeechDat - Car might be a lot more noisy than
Mm - hmm. Of that I mean , the SNR after the noise compensation of the SpeechDat - Car.
Oh , so Right. So the training the the neural net is being trained with noise compensated stuff.
Maybe.
false
QMSum_194
Mm - hmm. Of that I mean , the SNR after the noise compensation of the SpeechDat - Car.
Oh , so Right. So the training the the neural net is being trained with noise compensated stuff.
Maybe.
Yeah.
false
QMSum_194
Oh , so Right. So the training the the neural net is being trained with noise compensated stuff.
Maybe.
Yeah.
Yeah , yeah.
false
QMSum_194
Maybe.
Yeah.
Yeah , yeah.
Which makes sense ,
false
QMSum_194
Yeah.
Yeah , yeah.
Which makes sense ,
Yeah.
false
QMSum_194
Yeah , yeah.
Which makes sense ,
Yeah.
but , uh , you 're saying Yeah , the noisier ones are still going to be , even after our noise compensation , are still gonna be pretty noisy.
false
QMSum_194
Which makes sense ,
Yeah.
but , uh , you 're saying Yeah , the noisier ones are still going to be , even after our noise compensation , are still gonna be pretty noisy.
Yeah.
false
QMSum_194
Yeah.
but , uh , you 're saying Yeah , the noisier ones are still going to be , even after our noise compensation , are still gonna be pretty noisy.
Yeah.
Mm - hmm.
false
QMSum_194
but , uh , you 're saying Yeah , the noisier ones are still going to be , even after our noise compensation , are still gonna be pretty noisy.
Yeah.
Mm - hmm.
Yeah , so now the after - noise compensation the neural net is seeing a different set of S N Rs than that was originally there in the training set. Of TIMIT. Because in the TIMIT it was zero to some clean.
false
QMSum_194
Yeah.
Mm - hmm.
Yeah , so now the after - noise compensation the neural net is seeing a different set of S N Rs than that was originally there in the training set. Of TIMIT. Because in the TIMIT it was zero to some clean.
Right. Yes.
false
QMSum_194
Mm - hmm.
Yeah , so now the after - noise compensation the neural net is seeing a different set of S N Rs than that was originally there in the training set. Of TIMIT. Because in the TIMIT it was zero to some clean.
Right. Yes.
So the net saw all the SNR @ @ conditions.
false
QMSum_194
Yeah , so now the after - noise compensation the neural net is seeing a different set of S N Rs than that was originally there in the training set. Of TIMIT. Because in the TIMIT it was zero to some clean.
Right. Yes.
So the net saw all the SNR @ @ conditions.
Right.
false
QMSum_194
Right. Yes.
So the net saw all the SNR @ @ conditions.
Right.
Now after cleaning up it 's a different set of SNR.
false
QMSum_194
So the net saw all the SNR @ @ conditions.
Right.
Now after cleaning up it 's a different set of SNR.
Right.
false
QMSum_194
Right.
Now after cleaning up it 's a different set of SNR.
Right.
And that SNR may not be , like , com covering the whole set of S N Rs that you 're getting in the SpeechDat - Car.
false
QMSum_194
Now after cleaning up it 's a different set of SNR.
Right.
And that SNR may not be , like , com covering the whole set of S N Rs that you 're getting in the SpeechDat - Car.
Right , but the SpeechDat - Car data that you 're seeing is also reduced in noise by the noise compensation.
false
QMSum_194
Right.
And that SNR may not be , like , com covering the whole set of S N Rs that you 're getting in the SpeechDat - Car.
Right , but the SpeechDat - Car data that you 're seeing is also reduced in noise by the noise compensation.
Yeah.
false
QMSum_194
And that SNR may not be , like , com covering the whole set of S N Rs that you 're getting in the SpeechDat - Car.
Right , but the SpeechDat - Car data that you 're seeing is also reduced in noise by the noise compensation.
Yeah.
Yeah , yeah , yeah , yeah , it is. But , I 'm saying , there could be some some issues of
false
QMSum_194
Right , but the SpeechDat - Car data that you 're seeing is also reduced in noise by the noise compensation.
Yeah.
Yeah , yeah , yeah , yeah , it is. But , I 'm saying , there could be some some issues of
So.
false
QMSum_194
Yeah.
Yeah , yeah , yeah , yeah , it is. But , I 'm saying , there could be some some issues of
So.
Mm - hmm.
false
QMSum_194
Yeah , yeah , yeah , yeah , it is. But , I 'm saying , there could be some some issues of
So.
Mm - hmm.
Yeah.
false
QMSum_194
So.
Mm - hmm.
Yeah.
Well , if the initial range of SNR is different , we the problem was already there before. And
false
QMSum_194
Mm - hmm.
Yeah.
Well , if the initial range of SNR is different , we the problem was already there before. And
Yeah.
false
QMSum_194
Yeah.
Well , if the initial range of SNR is different , we the problem was already there before. And
Yeah.
Because Mmm
false
QMSum_194
Well , if the initial range of SNR is different , we the problem was already there before. And
Yeah.
Because Mmm
Yeah , I mean , it depends on whether you believe that the noise compensation is equally reducing the noise on the test set and the training set.
false
QMSum_194
Yeah.
Because Mmm
Yeah , I mean , it depends on whether you believe that the noise compensation is equally reducing the noise on the test set and the training set.
Hmm.
false
QMSum_194
Because Mmm
Yeah , I mean , it depends on whether you believe that the noise compensation is equally reducing the noise on the test set and the training set.
Hmm.
Uh
false
QMSum_194
Yeah , I mean , it depends on whether you believe that the noise compensation is equally reducing the noise on the test set and the training set.
Hmm.
Uh
On the test set , yeah.
false
QMSum_194
Hmm.
Uh
On the test set , yeah.
Right ? I mean , you 're saying there 's a mismatch in noise that wasn't there before ,
false
QMSum_194
Uh
On the test set , yeah.
Right ? I mean , you 're saying there 's a mismatch in noise that wasn't there before ,
Hmm. Mm - hmm.
false
QMSum_194
On the test set , yeah.
Right ? I mean , you 're saying there 's a mismatch in noise that wasn't there before ,
Hmm. Mm - hmm.
but if they were both the same before , then if they were both reduic reduced equally , then , there would not be a mismatch.
false
QMSum_194
Right ? I mean , you 're saying there 's a mismatch in noise that wasn't there before ,
Hmm. Mm - hmm.
but if they were both the same before , then if they were both reduic reduced equally , then , there would not be a mismatch.
Mm - hmm.
false
QMSum_194
Hmm. Mm - hmm.
but if they were both the same before , then if they were both reduic reduced equally , then , there would not be a mismatch.
Mm - hmm.
So , I mean , this may be Heaven forbid , this noise compensation process may be imperfect , but. Uh , so maybe it 's treating some things differently.
false
QMSum_194
but if they were both the same before , then if they were both reduic reduced equally , then , there would not be a mismatch.
Mm - hmm.
So , I mean , this may be Heaven forbid , this noise compensation process may be imperfect , but. Uh , so maybe it 's treating some things differently.
Yeah , uh
false
QMSum_194
Mm - hmm.
So , I mean , this may be Heaven forbid , this noise compensation process may be imperfect , but. Uh , so maybe it 's treating some things differently.
Yeah , uh
Well , I I don't know. I I just that could be seen from the TI - digits , uh , testing condition because , um , the noises are from the TI - digits , right ? Noise
false
QMSum_194
So , I mean , this may be Heaven forbid , this noise compensation process may be imperfect , but. Uh , so maybe it 's treating some things differently.
Yeah , uh
Well , I I don't know. I I just that could be seen from the TI - digits , uh , testing condition because , um , the noises are from the TI - digits , right ? Noise
Yeah. So
false
QMSum_194
Yeah , uh
Well , I I don't know. I I just that could be seen from the TI - digits , uh , testing condition because , um , the noises are from the TI - digits , right ? Noise
Yeah. So
So cleaning up the TI - digits and if the performance goes down in the TI - digits mismatch high mismatch like this
false
QMSum_194
Well , I I don't know. I I just that could be seen from the TI - digits , uh , testing condition because , um , the noises are from the TI - digits , right ? Noise
Yeah. So
So cleaning up the TI - digits and if the performance goes down in the TI - digits mismatch high mismatch like this
Clean training , yeah.
false
QMSum_194
Yeah. So
So cleaning up the TI - digits and if the performance goes down in the TI - digits mismatch high mismatch like this
Clean training , yeah.
on a clean training , or zero DB testing.
false
QMSum_194
So cleaning up the TI - digits and if the performance goes down in the TI - digits mismatch high mismatch like this
Clean training , yeah.
on a clean training , or zero DB testing.
Yeah , we 'll so we 'll see. Uh.
false
QMSum_194
Clean training , yeah.
on a clean training , or zero DB testing.
Yeah , we 'll so we 'll see. Uh.
Yeah.
false
QMSum_194
on a clean training , or zero DB testing.
Yeah , we 'll so we 'll see. Uh.
Yeah.
Maybe.
false
QMSum_194
Yeah , we 'll so we 'll see. Uh.
Yeah.
Maybe.
Then it 's something to do.
false
QMSum_194
Yeah.
Maybe.
Then it 's something to do.
Mm - hmm.
false
QMSum_194
Maybe.
Then it 's something to do.
Mm - hmm.
I mean , one of the things about
false
QMSum_194
Then it 's something to do.
Mm - hmm.
I mean , one of the things about
Yeah.
false
QMSum_194
Mm - hmm.
I mean , one of the things about
Yeah.
I mean , the Macrophone data , um , I think , you know , it was recorded over many different telephones.
false
QMSum_194
I mean , one of the things about
Yeah.
I mean , the Macrophone data , um , I think , you know , it was recorded over many different telephones.
Mm - hmm.
false
QMSum_194
Yeah.
I mean , the Macrophone data , um , I think , you know , it was recorded over many different telephones.
Mm - hmm.
And , um , so , there 's lots of different kinds of acoustic conditions. I mean , it 's not artificially added noise or anything. So it 's not the same. I don't think there 's anybody recording over a car from a car , but I think it 's it 's varied enough that if if doing this adjustments , uh , and playing around with it doesn't , uh , make it better , the most uh , it seems like the most obvious thing to do is to improve the training set. Um I mean , what we were uh the condition It it gave us an enormous amount of improvement in what we were doing with Meeting Recorder digits , even though there , again , these m Macrophone digits were very , very different from , uh , what we were going on here. I mean , we weren't talking over a telephone here. But it was just I think just having a a nice variation in acoustic conditions was just a good thing.
false
QMSum_194
I mean , the Macrophone data , um , I think , you know , it was recorded over many different telephones.
Mm - hmm.
And , um , so , there 's lots of different kinds of acoustic conditions. I mean , it 's not artificially added noise or anything. So it 's not the same. I don't think there 's anybody recording over a car from a car , but I think it 's it 's varied enough that if if doing this adjustments , uh , and playing around with it doesn't , uh , make it better , the most uh , it seems like the most obvious thing to do is to improve the training set. Um I mean , what we were uh the condition It it gave us an enormous amount of improvement in what we were doing with Meeting Recorder digits , even though there , again , these m Macrophone digits were very , very different from , uh , what we were going on here. I mean , we weren't talking over a telephone here. But it was just I think just having a a nice variation in acoustic conditions was just a good thing.
Mm - hmm. Yep.
false
QMSum_194
Mm - hmm.
And , um , so , there 's lots of different kinds of acoustic conditions. I mean , it 's not artificially added noise or anything. So it 's not the same. I don't think there 's anybody recording over a car from a car , but I think it 's it 's varied enough that if if doing this adjustments , uh , and playing around with it doesn't , uh , make it better , the most uh , it seems like the most obvious thing to do is to improve the training set. Um I mean , what we were uh the condition It it gave us an enormous amount of improvement in what we were doing with Meeting Recorder digits , even though there , again , these m Macrophone digits were very , very different from , uh , what we were going on here. I mean , we weren't talking over a telephone here. But it was just I think just having a a nice variation in acoustic conditions was just a good thing.
Mm - hmm. Yep.
Mmm.
false
QMSum_194
And , um , so , there 's lots of different kinds of acoustic conditions. I mean , it 's not artificially added noise or anything. So it 's not the same. I don't think there 's anybody recording over a car from a car , but I think it 's it 's varied enough that if if doing this adjustments , uh , and playing around with it doesn't , uh , make it better , the most uh , it seems like the most obvious thing to do is to improve the training set. Um I mean , what we were uh the condition It it gave us an enormous amount of improvement in what we were doing with Meeting Recorder digits , even though there , again , these m Macrophone digits were very , very different from , uh , what we were going on here. I mean , we weren't talking over a telephone here. But it was just I think just having a a nice variation in acoustic conditions was just a good thing.
Mm - hmm. Yep.
Mmm.
Yeah , actually to s eh , what I observed in the HM case is that the number of deletion dramatically increases. It it doubles.
false
QMSum_194
Mm - hmm. Yep.
Mmm.
Yeah , actually to s eh , what I observed in the HM case is that the number of deletion dramatically increases. It it doubles.
Number of deletions.
true
QMSum_194
Mmm.
Yeah , actually to s eh , what I observed in the HM case is that the number of deletion dramatically increases. It it doubles.
Number of deletions.
When I added the num the neural network it doubles the number of deletions. Yeah , so I don't you know how to interpret that , but , mmm
false
QMSum_194
Yeah , actually to s eh , what I observed in the HM case is that the number of deletion dramatically increases. It it doubles.
Number of deletions.
When I added the num the neural network it doubles the number of deletions. Yeah , so I don't you know how to interpret that , but , mmm
Yeah. Me either.
false
QMSum_194
Number of deletions.
When I added the num the neural network it doubles the number of deletions. Yeah , so I don't you know how to interpret that , but , mmm
Yeah. Me either.
And and did an other numbers stay the same ? Insertion substitutions stay the same ?
false
QMSum_194
When I added the num the neural network it doubles the number of deletions. Yeah , so I don't you know how to interpret that , but , mmm
Yeah. Me either.
And and did an other numbers stay the same ? Insertion substitutions stay the same ?
They p stayed the same ,
false
QMSum_194
Yeah. Me either.
And and did an other numbers stay the same ? Insertion substitutions stay the same ?
They p stayed the same ,
Roughly ?
false
QMSum_194
And and did an other numbers stay the same ? Insertion substitutions stay the same ?
They p stayed the same ,
Roughly ?
they maybe they are a little bit uh , lower.
false
QMSum_194
They p stayed the same ,
Roughly ?
they maybe they are a little bit uh , lower.
Uh - huh.
false
QMSum_194
Roughly ?
they maybe they are a little bit uh , lower.
Uh - huh.
They are a little bit better. Yeah. But
false
QMSum_194
they maybe they are a little bit uh , lower.
Uh - huh.
They are a little bit better. Yeah. But
Did they increase the number of deletions even for the cases that got better ?
false
QMSum_194
Uh - huh.
They are a little bit better. Yeah. But
Did they increase the number of deletions even for the cases that got better ?
Mm - hmm.
false
QMSum_194
They are a little bit better. Yeah. But
Did they increase the number of deletions even for the cases that got better ?
Mm - hmm.
Say , for the I mean , it
false
QMSum_194
Did they increase the number of deletions even for the cases that got better ?
Mm - hmm.
Say , for the I mean , it
No , it doesn't.
false
QMSum_194
Mm - hmm.
Say , for the I mean , it
No , it doesn't.
So it 's only the highly mismatched ?
false
QMSum_194
Say , for the I mean , it
No , it doesn't.
So it 's only the highly mismatched ?
No.
false
QMSum_194
No , it doesn't.
So it 's only the highly mismatched ?
No.
And it Remind me again , the " highly mismatched " means that the
false
QMSum_194
So it 's only the highly mismatched ?
No.
And it Remind me again , the " highly mismatched " means that the
Clean training and
false
QMSum_194
No.
And it Remind me again , the " highly mismatched " means that the
Clean training and
Uh , sorry ?
false
QMSum_194
And it Remind me again , the " highly mismatched " means that the
Clean training and
Uh , sorry ?
It 's clean training Well , close microphone training and distant microphone , um , high speed , I think.
false
QMSum_194
Clean training and
Uh , sorry ?
It 's clean training Well , close microphone training and distant microphone , um , high speed , I think.
Close mike training
false
QMSum_194
Uh , sorry ?
It 's clean training Well , close microphone training and distant microphone , um , high speed , I think.
Close mike training
Well The most noisy cases are the distant microphone for testing.
false
QMSum_194
It 's clean training Well , close microphone training and distant microphone , um , high speed , I think.
Close mike training
Well The most noisy cases are the distant microphone for testing.
Right. So Well , maybe the noise subtraction is subtracting off speech.
false
QMSum_194
Close mike training
Well The most noisy cases are the distant microphone for testing.
Right. So Well , maybe the noise subtraction is subtracting off speech.
Separating. Yeah.
false
QMSum_194
Well The most noisy cases are the distant microphone for testing.
Right. So Well , maybe the noise subtraction is subtracting off speech.
Separating. Yeah.
Wh
false
QMSum_194
Right. So Well , maybe the noise subtraction is subtracting off speech.
Separating. Yeah.
Wh
But Yeah. I mean , but without the neural network it 's well , it 's better. It 's just when we add the neural networks.
false
QMSum_194
Separating. Yeah.
Wh
But Yeah. I mean , but without the neural network it 's well , it 's better. It 's just when we add the neural networks.
Yeah , right.
false
QMSum_194
Wh
But Yeah. I mean , but without the neural network it 's well , it 's better. It 's just when we add the neural networks.
Yeah , right.
The feature are the same except that
false
QMSum_194
But Yeah. I mean , but without the neural network it 's well , it 's better. It 's just when we add the neural networks.
Yeah , right.
The feature are the same except that
Uh , that 's right , that 's right. Um
false
QMSum_194
Yeah , right.
The feature are the same except that
Uh , that 's right , that 's right. Um
Well that that says that , you know , the , um the models in in , uh , the recognizer are really paying attention to the neural net features.
false
QMSum_194
The feature are the same except that
Uh , that 's right , that 's right. Um
Well that that says that , you know , the , um the models in in , uh , the recognizer are really paying attention to the neural net features.
Yeah.
false
QMSum_194
Uh , that 's right , that 's right. Um
Well that that says that , you know , the , um the models in in , uh , the recognizer are really paying attention to the neural net features.
Yeah.
Uh.
false
QMSum_194
Well that that says that , you know , the , um the models in in , uh , the recognizer are really paying attention to the neural net features.
Yeah.
Uh.
Mm - hmm.
false
QMSum_194
Yeah.
Uh.
Mm - hmm.
But , yeah , actually the TIMIT noises are sort of a range of noises and they 're not so much the stationary driving kind of noises , right ? It 's it 's pretty different. Isn't it ?
false
QMSum_194