<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street and surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street and surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street and surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore surveillance footage does not show a suspicious van parked near sarah's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a suspicious van parked near Sarah's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence surveillance footage does not show a suspicious van parked near sarah's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a suspicious van parked near Sarah's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus surveillance footage does not show a suspicious van parked near sarah's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a suspicious van parked near Sarah's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that surveillance footage does not show a suspicious van parked near sarah's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a suspicious van parked near Sarah's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so surveillance footage does not show a suspicious van parked near sarah's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a suspicious van parked near Sarah's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that surveillance footage does not show a suspicious van parked near sarah's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a suspicious van parked near Sarah's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that surveillance footage does not show a suspicious van parked near sarah's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a suspicious van parked near Sarah's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that surveillance footage does not show a suspicious van parked near sarah's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a suspicious van parked near Sarah's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Surveillance footage does not show a suspicious van parked near sarah's house, since if surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a suspicious van parked near Sarah's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Surveillance footage does not show a suspicious van parked near sarah's house, because if surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a suspicious van parked near Sarah's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Surveillance footage does not show a suspicious van parked near sarah's house, as if surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a suspicious van parked near Sarah's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street and a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street and a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street and a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore no coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No coded message was found in Richard Anderson's office safe
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence no coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No coded message was found in Richard Anderson's office safe
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus no coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No coded message was found in Richard Anderson's office safe
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that no coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No coded message was found in Richard Anderson's office safe
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so no coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No coded message was found in Richard Anderson's office safe
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that no coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No coded message was found in Richard Anderson's office safe
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that no coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No coded message was found in Richard Anderson's office safe
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that no coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No coded message was found in Richard Anderson's office safe
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe, since if a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No coded message was found in Richard Anderson's office safe
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe, because if a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No coded message was found in Richard Anderson's office safe
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe, as if a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a coded message was found in richard anderson's office safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No coded message was found in Richard Anderson's office safe
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street and a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street and a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street and a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a trail of stolen jewelry does not lead to a storage unit rented by emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A trail of stolen jewelry does not lead to a storage unit rented by Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a trail of stolen jewelry does not lead to a storage unit rented by emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A trail of stolen jewelry does not lead to a storage unit rented by Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a trail of stolen jewelry does not lead to a storage unit rented by emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A trail of stolen jewelry does not lead to a storage unit rented by Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a trail of stolen jewelry does not lead to a storage unit rented by emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A trail of stolen jewelry does not lead to a storage unit rented by Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a trail of stolen jewelry does not lead to a storage unit rented by emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A trail of stolen jewelry does not lead to a storage unit rented by Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a trail of stolen jewelry does not lead to a storage unit rented by emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A trail of stolen jewelry does not lead to a storage unit rented by Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a trail of stolen jewelry does not lead to a storage unit rented by emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A trail of stolen jewelry does not lead to a storage unit rented by Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a trail of stolen jewelry does not lead to a storage unit rented by emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A trail of stolen jewelry does not lead to a storage unit rented by Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A trail of stolen jewelry does not lead to a storage unit rented by emily, since if a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A trail of stolen jewelry does not lead to a storage unit rented by Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A trail of stolen jewelry does not lead to a storage unit rented by emily, because if a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A trail of stolen jewelry does not lead to a storage unit rented by Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A trail of stolen jewelry does not lead to a storage unit rented by emily, as if a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a trail of stolen jewelry leads to a storage unit rented by emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A trail of stolen jewelry does not lead to a storage unit rented by Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street and officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street and officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street and officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore officer lewis did not find a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Officer Lewis did not find a hidden stash of cash in Sarah's closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence officer lewis did not find a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Officer Lewis did not find a hidden stash of cash in Sarah's closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus officer lewis did not find a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Officer Lewis did not find a hidden stash of cash in Sarah's closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that officer lewis did not find a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Officer Lewis did not find a hidden stash of cash in Sarah's closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so officer lewis did not find a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Officer Lewis did not find a hidden stash of cash in Sarah's closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that officer lewis did not find a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Officer Lewis did not find a hidden stash of cash in Sarah's closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that officer lewis did not find a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Officer Lewis did not find a hidden stash of cash in Sarah's closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that officer lewis did not find a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Officer Lewis did not find a hidden stash of cash in Sarah's closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer lewis did not find a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet, since if officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Officer Lewis did not find a hidden stash of cash in Sarah's closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer lewis did not find a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet, because if officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Officer Lewis did not find a hidden stash of cash in Sarah's closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer lewis did not find a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet, as if officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer lewis found a hidden stash of cash in sarah's closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Officer Lewis did not find a hidden stash of cash in Sarah's closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street and sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street and sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street and sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore sarah had not recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah had not recently changed her will, leaving everything to Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence sarah had not recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah had not recently changed her will, leaving everything to Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus sarah had not recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah had not recently changed her will, leaving everything to Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that sarah had not recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently changed her will, leaving everything to emily then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah had not recently changed her will, leaving everything to Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.