<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the alarm company technician reported suspicious activity before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the alarm company technician did not report suspicious activity before the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the alarm company technician reported suspicious activity before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The alarm company technician did not report suspicious activity before the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the alarm company technician reported suspicious activity before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the alarm company technician did not report suspicious activity before the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the alarm company technician reported suspicious activity before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The alarm company technician did not report suspicious activity before the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the alarm company technician reported suspicious activity before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the alarm company technician did not report suspicious activity before the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the alarm company technician reported suspicious activity before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The alarm company technician did not report suspicious activity before the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the alarm company technician reported suspicious activity before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the alarm company technician did not report suspicious activity before the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the alarm company technician reported suspicious activity before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The alarm company technician did not report suspicious activity before the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the alarm company technician reported suspicious activity before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the alarm company technician did not report suspicious activity before the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the alarm company technician reported suspicious activity before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The alarm company technician did not report suspicious activity before the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the alarm company technician reported suspicious activity before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the alarm company technician did not report suspicious activity before the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the alarm company technician reported suspicious activity before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The alarm company technician did not report suspicious activity before the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The alarm company technician did not report suspicious activity before the robbery, since if the alarm company technician reported suspicious activity before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the alarm company technician reported suspicious activity before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The alarm company technician did not report suspicious activity before the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The alarm company technician did not report suspicious activity before the robbery, because if the alarm company technician reported suspicious activity before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the alarm company technician reported suspicious activity before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The alarm company technician did not report suspicious activity before the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The alarm company technician did not report suspicious activity before the robbery, as if the alarm company technician reported suspicious activity before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the alarm company technician reported suspicious activity before the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The alarm company technician did not report suspicious activity before the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore sarah's neighbor did not report hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's neighbor did not report hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence sarah's neighbor did not report hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's neighbor did not report hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus sarah's neighbor did not report hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's neighbor did not report hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that sarah's neighbor did not report hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's neighbor did not report hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so sarah's neighbor did not report hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's neighbor did not report hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that sarah's neighbor did not report hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's neighbor did not report hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that sarah's neighbor did not report hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's neighbor did not report hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that sarah's neighbor did not report hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's neighbor did not report hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sarah's neighbor did not report hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder, since if sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's neighbor did not report hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sarah's neighbor did not report hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder, because if sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's neighbor did not report hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sarah's neighbor did not report hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder, as if sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's neighbor reported hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's neighbor did not report hearing a gunshot on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street and a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street and a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street and a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was not found at marcus's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A jeweler's loupe with Sarah's fingerprints was not found at Marcus's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was not found at marcus's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A jeweler's loupe with Sarah's fingerprints was not found at Marcus's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was not found at marcus's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A jeweler's loupe with Sarah's fingerprints was not found at Marcus's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was not found at marcus's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A jeweler's loupe with Sarah's fingerprints was not found at Marcus's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was not found at marcus's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A jeweler's loupe with Sarah's fingerprints was not found at Marcus's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was not found at marcus's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A jeweler's loupe with Sarah's fingerprints was not found at Marcus's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was not found at marcus's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A jeweler's loupe with Sarah's fingerprints was not found at Marcus's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was not found at marcus's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A jeweler's loupe with Sarah's fingerprints was not found at Marcus's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was not found at marcus's home, since if a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A jeweler's loupe with Sarah's fingerprints was not found at Marcus's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was not found at marcus's home, because if a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A jeweler's loupe with Sarah's fingerprints was not found at Marcus's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was not found at marcus's home, as if a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jeweler's loupe with sarah's fingerprints was found at marcus's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A jeweler's loupe with Sarah's fingerprints was not found at Marcus's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street and a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street and a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street and a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore no security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence no security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus no security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that no security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so no security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that no security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that no security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that no security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster, since if a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster, because if a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster, as if a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No security guard uniform was discovered in a nearby dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street and emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street and emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street and emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore emily had not recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily had not recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence emily had not recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily had not recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus emily had not recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily had not recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that emily had not recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily had not recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so emily had not recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily had not recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that emily had not recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily had not recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that emily had not recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily had not recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that emily had not recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily had not recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily had not recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate, since if emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily had not recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily had not recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate, because if emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily had not recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily had not recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate, as if emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily had not recently taken out a loan with a high-interest rate
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a suspicious van parked near sarah's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.