<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Richard anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions, as if richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's financial records revealed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Richard Anderson's financial records did not reveal suspicious transactions
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon had sarah's dna on it
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon had sarah's dna on it
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon had sarah's dna on it
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon had sarah's dna on it
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon had sarah's dna on it
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon had sarah's dna on it
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon had sarah's dna on it
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon had sarah's dna on it
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street and the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon had sarah's dna on it
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street and the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon had sarah's dna on it
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street and the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon had sarah's dna on it
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the murder weapon did not have sarah's dna on it.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon did not have Sarah's DNA on it
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the murder weapon did not have sarah's dna on it.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon did not have Sarah's DNA on it
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the murder weapon did not have sarah's dna on it.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon did not have Sarah's DNA on it
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the murder weapon did not have sarah's dna on it.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon did not have Sarah's DNA on it
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the murder weapon did not have sarah's dna on it.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon did not have Sarah's DNA on it
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the murder weapon did not have sarah's dna on it.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon did not have Sarah's DNA on it
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the murder weapon did not have sarah's dna on it.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon did not have Sarah's DNA on it
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the murder weapon did not have sarah's dna on it.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon did not have Sarah's DNA on it
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The murder weapon did not have sarah's dna on it, since if the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon did not have Sarah's DNA on it
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The murder weapon did not have sarah's dna on it, because if the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon did not have Sarah's DNA on it
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The murder weapon did not have sarah's dna on it, as if the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon had sarah's dna on it then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon did not have Sarah's DNA on it
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street and a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street and a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street and a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a diamond necklace from the store was not found in a pawn shop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A diamond necklace from the store was not found in a pawn shop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a diamond necklace from the store was not found in a pawn shop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A diamond necklace from the store was not found in a pawn shop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a diamond necklace from the store was not found in a pawn shop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A diamond necklace from the store was not found in a pawn shop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a diamond necklace from the store was not found in a pawn shop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A diamond necklace from the store was not found in a pawn shop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a diamond necklace from the store was not found in a pawn shop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A diamond necklace from the store was not found in a pawn shop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a diamond necklace from the store was not found in a pawn shop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A diamond necklace from the store was not found in a pawn shop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a diamond necklace from the store was not found in a pawn shop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A diamond necklace from the store was not found in a pawn shop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a diamond necklace from the store was not found in a pawn shop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A diamond necklace from the store was not found in a pawn shop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A diamond necklace from the store was not found in a pawn shop, since if a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A diamond necklace from the store was not found in a pawn shop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A diamond necklace from the store was not found in a pawn shop, because if a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A diamond necklace from the store was not found in a pawn shop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A diamond necklace from the store was not found in a pawn shop, as if a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diamond necklace from the store was found in a pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A diamond necklace from the store was not found in a pawn shop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street and the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street and the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street and the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the store's cleaning crew did not report unusual behavior from a coworker.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The store's cleaning crew did not report unusual behavior from a coworker
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the store's cleaning crew did not report unusual behavior from a coworker.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The store's cleaning crew did not report unusual behavior from a coworker
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the store's cleaning crew did not report unusual behavior from a coworker.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The store's cleaning crew did not report unusual behavior from a coworker
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the store's cleaning crew did not report unusual behavior from a coworker.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The store's cleaning crew did not report unusual behavior from a coworker
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the store's cleaning crew did not report unusual behavior from a coworker.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The store's cleaning crew did not report unusual behavior from a coworker
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the store's cleaning crew did not report unusual behavior from a coworker.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The store's cleaning crew did not report unusual behavior from a coworker
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the store's cleaning crew did not report unusual behavior from a coworker.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The store's cleaning crew did not report unusual behavior from a coworker
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the store's cleaning crew did not report unusual behavior from a coworker.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The store's cleaning crew did not report unusual behavior from a coworker
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The store's cleaning crew did not report unusual behavior from a coworker, since if the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The store's cleaning crew did not report unusual behavior from a coworker
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The store's cleaning crew did not report unusual behavior from a coworker, because if the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The store's cleaning crew did not report unusual behavior from a coworker
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The store's cleaning crew did not report unusual behavior from a coworker, as if the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's cleaning crew reported unusual behavior from a coworker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The store's cleaning crew did not report unusual behavior from a coworker
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore emily was not seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily was not seen arguing with Sarah the day before the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence emily was not seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily was not seen arguing with Sarah the day before the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus emily was not seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily was not seen arguing with Sarah the day before the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that emily was not seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily was not seen arguing with Sarah the day before the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so emily was not seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily was not seen arguing with Sarah the day before the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that emily was not seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily was not seen arguing with Sarah the day before the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that emily was not seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily was not seen arguing with Sarah the day before the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that emily was not seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily was not seen arguing with Sarah the day before the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily was not seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder, since if emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily was not seen arguing with Sarah the day before the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily was not seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder, because if emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily was not seen arguing with Sarah the day before the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily was not seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder, as if emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily was seen arguing with sarah the day before the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily was not seen arguing with Sarah the day before the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar then the arson occurred on elm street and a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar then the arson occurred on elm street and a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar then the arson occurred on elm street and a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A fingerprint matching marcus was found on the crowbar
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.