<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sarah's best friend, lisa, was not in financial distress before her death, since if sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sarah's best friend, lisa, was not in financial distress before her death, because if sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sarah's best friend, lisa, was not in financial distress before her death, as if sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street, and a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street, and a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street, and a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street, and a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street, and a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street, and a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street, and a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street, and a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street and a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street and a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street and a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store, since if a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store, because if a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store, as if a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street and emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street and emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street and emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky, since if emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky, because if emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky, as if emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street, and a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street, and a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street, and a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street, and a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street, and a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street, and a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street, and a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street, and a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street and a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street and a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street and a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in charlie's belongings.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in Charlie's belongings
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in charlie's belongings.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in Charlie's belongings
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in charlie's belongings.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in Charlie's belongings
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in charlie's belongings.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in Charlie's belongings
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in charlie's belongings.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in Charlie's belongings
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in charlie's belongings.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in Charlie's belongings
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in charlie's belongings.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in Charlie's belongings
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in charlie's belongings.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in Charlie's belongings
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in charlie's belongings, since if a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in Charlie's belongings
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in charlie's belongings, because if a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in Charlie's belongings
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in charlie's belongings, as if a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in Charlie's belongings
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street and a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street and a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street and a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a bloody handprint was not found on sarah's car door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A bloody handprint was not found on Sarah's car door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a bloody handprint was not found on sarah's car door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A bloody handprint was not found on Sarah's car door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a bloody handprint was not found on sarah's car door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A bloody handprint was not found on Sarah's car door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a bloody handprint was not found on sarah's car door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A bloody handprint was not found on Sarah's car door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a bloody handprint was not found on sarah's car door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A bloody handprint was not found on Sarah's car door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a bloody handprint was not found on sarah's car door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A bloody handprint was not found on Sarah's car door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a bloody handprint was not found on sarah's car door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A bloody handprint was not found on Sarah's car door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a bloody handprint was not found on sarah's car door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A bloody handprint was not found on Sarah's car door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A bloody handprint was not found on sarah's car door, since if a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A bloody handprint was not found on Sarah's car door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A bloody handprint was not found on sarah's car door, because if a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A bloody handprint was not found on Sarah's car door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A bloody handprint was not found on sarah's car door, as if a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A bloody handprint was not found on Sarah's car door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.