<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore detective hayes did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Hayes did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry buried in Emily's backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence detective hayes did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Hayes did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry buried in Emily's backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus detective hayes did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Hayes did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry buried in Emily's backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that detective hayes did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Hayes did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry buried in Emily's backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so detective hayes did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Hayes did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry buried in Emily's backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that detective hayes did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Hayes did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry buried in Emily's backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that detective hayes did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Hayes did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry buried in Emily's backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that detective hayes did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Hayes did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry buried in Emily's backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Detective hayes did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard, since if detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Hayes did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry buried in Emily's backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Detective hayes did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard, because if detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Hayes did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry buried in Emily's backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Detective hayes did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard, as if detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Hayes did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry buried in Emily's backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore richard anderson's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon's magazine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon's magazine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence richard anderson's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon's magazine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon's magazine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus richard anderson's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon's magazine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon's magazine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that richard anderson's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon's magazine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon's magazine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so richard anderson's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon's magazine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon's magazine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that richard anderson's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon's magazine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon's magazine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that richard anderson's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon's magazine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon's magazine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that richard anderson's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon's magazine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon's magazine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Richard anderson's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon's magazine, since if richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon's magazine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Richard anderson's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon's magazine, because if richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon's magazine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Richard anderson's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon's magazine, as if richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon's magazine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon's magazine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, did not have session notes indicating sarah's fear of emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's therapist, Dr. Anderson, did not have session notes indicating Sarah's fear of Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, did not have session notes indicating sarah's fear of emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's therapist, Dr. Anderson, did not have session notes indicating Sarah's fear of Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, did not have session notes indicating sarah's fear of emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's therapist, Dr. Anderson, did not have session notes indicating Sarah's fear of Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, did not have session notes indicating sarah's fear of emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's therapist, Dr. Anderson, did not have session notes indicating Sarah's fear of Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, did not have session notes indicating sarah's fear of emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's therapist, Dr. Anderson, did not have session notes indicating Sarah's fear of Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, did not have session notes indicating sarah's fear of emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's therapist, Dr. Anderson, did not have session notes indicating Sarah's fear of Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, did not have session notes indicating sarah's fear of emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's therapist, Dr. Anderson, did not have session notes indicating Sarah's fear of Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, did not have session notes indicating sarah's fear of emily.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's therapist, Dr. Anderson, did not have session notes indicating Sarah's fear of Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, did not have session notes indicating sarah's fear of emily, since if sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's therapist, Dr. Anderson, did not have session notes indicating Sarah's fear of Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, did not have session notes indicating sarah's fear of emily, because if sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's therapist, Dr. Anderson, did not have session notes indicating Sarah's fear of Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, did not have session notes indicating sarah's fear of emily, as if sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's therapist, dr. anderson, had sessions notes indicating sarah's fear of emily then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's therapist, Dr. Anderson, did not have session notes indicating Sarah's fear of Emily
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a gps device linked to the stolen van was not found in emily's possession.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A GPS device linked to the stolen van was not found in Emily's possession
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a gps device linked to the stolen van was not found in emily's possession.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A GPS device linked to the stolen van was not found in Emily's possession
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a gps device linked to the stolen van was not found in emily's possession.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A GPS device linked to the stolen van was not found in Emily's possession
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a gps device linked to the stolen van was not found in emily's possession.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A GPS device linked to the stolen van was not found in Emily's possession
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a gps device linked to the stolen van was not found in emily's possession.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A GPS device linked to the stolen van was not found in Emily's possession
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a gps device linked to the stolen van was not found in emily's possession.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A GPS device linked to the stolen van was not found in Emily's possession
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a gps device linked to the stolen van was not found in emily's possession.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A GPS device linked to the stolen van was not found in Emily's possession
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a gps device linked to the stolen van was not found in emily's possession.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A GPS device linked to the stolen van was not found in Emily's possession
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A gps device linked to the stolen van was not found in emily's possession, since if a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A GPS device linked to the stolen van was not found in Emily's possession
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A gps device linked to the stolen van was not found in emily's possession, because if a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A GPS device linked to the stolen van was not found in Emily's possession
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A gps device linked to the stolen van was not found in emily's possession, as if a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gps device linked to the stolen van was found in emily's possession then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A GPS device linked to the stolen van was not found in Emily's possession
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore surveillance footage does not show a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence surveillance footage does not show a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus surveillance footage does not show a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that surveillance footage does not show a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so surveillance footage does not show a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that surveillance footage does not show a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that surveillance footage does not show a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that surveillance footage does not show a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Surveillance footage does not show a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store, since if surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Surveillance footage does not show a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store, because if surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a man with a distinctive scar on his face near the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.