<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's computer did not contain detailed plans of the jewelry store layout, since if emily's computer contained detailed plans of the jewelry store layout then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's computer contained detailed plans of the jewelry store layout then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's computer did not contain detailed plans of the jewelry store layout
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's computer did not contain detailed plans of the jewelry store layout, because if emily's computer contained detailed plans of the jewelry store layout then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's computer contained detailed plans of the jewelry store layout then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's computer did not contain detailed plans of the jewelry store layout
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's computer did not contain detailed plans of the jewelry store layout, as if emily's computer contained detailed plans of the jewelry store layout then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's computer contained detailed plans of the jewelry store layout then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's computer did not contain detailed plans of the jewelry store layout
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No homeless man named Jerry claimed to have overheard Emily discussing the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No homeless man named Jerry claimed to have overheard Emily discussing the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No homeless man named Jerry claimed to have overheard Emily discussing the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No homeless man named Jerry claimed to have overheard Emily discussing the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No homeless man named Jerry claimed to have overheard Emily discussing the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No homeless man named Jerry claimed to have overheard Emily discussing the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No homeless man named Jerry claimed to have overheard Emily discussing the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No homeless man named Jerry claimed to have overheard Emily discussing the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery, since if a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No homeless man named Jerry claimed to have overheard Emily discussing the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery, because if a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No homeless man named Jerry claimed to have overheard Emily discussing the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery, as if a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named jerry claimed to have overheard emily discussing the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No homeless man named Jerry claimed to have overheard Emily discussing the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a jewelry store employee, michelle, did not have a gambling addiction.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A jewelry store employee, Michelle, did not have a gambling addiction
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a jewelry store employee, michelle, did not have a gambling addiction.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A jewelry store employee, Michelle, did not have a gambling addiction
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a jewelry store employee, michelle, did not have a gambling addiction.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A jewelry store employee, Michelle, did not have a gambling addiction
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a jewelry store employee, michelle, did not have a gambling addiction.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A jewelry store employee, Michelle, did not have a gambling addiction
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a jewelry store employee, michelle, did not have a gambling addiction.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A jewelry store employee, Michelle, did not have a gambling addiction
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a jewelry store employee, michelle, did not have a gambling addiction.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A jewelry store employee, Michelle, did not have a gambling addiction
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a jewelry store employee, michelle, did not have a gambling addiction.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A jewelry store employee, Michelle, did not have a gambling addiction
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a jewelry store employee, michelle, did not have a gambling addiction.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A jewelry store employee, Michelle, did not have a gambling addiction
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A jewelry store employee, michelle, did not have a gambling addiction, since if a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A jewelry store employee, Michelle, did not have a gambling addiction
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A jewelry store employee, michelle, did not have a gambling addiction, because if a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A jewelry store employee, Michelle, did not have a gambling addiction
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A jewelry store employee, michelle, did not have a gambling addiction, as if a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a jewelry store employee, michelle, had a gambling addiction then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A jewelry store employee, Michelle, did not have a gambling addiction
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No stolen necklace was found in Marcus's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No stolen necklace was found in Marcus's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No stolen necklace was found in Marcus's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No stolen necklace was found in Marcus's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No stolen necklace was found in Marcus's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No stolen necklace was found in Marcus's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No stolen necklace was found in Marcus's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No stolen necklace was found in Marcus's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment, since if a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No stolen necklace was found in Marcus's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment, because if a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No stolen necklace was found in Marcus's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment, as if a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen necklace was found in marcus's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No stolen necklace was found in Marcus's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore emily's car was not seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's car was not seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence emily's car was not seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's car was not seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus emily's car was not seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's car was not seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that emily's car was not seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's car was not seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so emily's car was not seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's car was not seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that emily's car was not seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's car was not seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that emily's car was not seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's car was not seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that emily's car was not seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's car was not seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's car was not seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder, since if emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's car was not seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's car was not seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder, because if emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's car was not seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's car was not seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder, as if emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's car was seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's car was not seen leaving the crime scene shortly after the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective hayes discovered a stash of stolen jewelry buried in emily's backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.