<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway, as if laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a handwritten note with threats was not found in laura's mailbox.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten note with threats was not found in Laura's mailbox
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a handwritten note with threats was not found in laura's mailbox.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten note with threats was not found in Laura's mailbox
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a handwritten note with threats was not found in laura's mailbox.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten note with threats was not found in Laura's mailbox
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a handwritten note with threats was not found in laura's mailbox.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten note with threats was not found in Laura's mailbox
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a handwritten note with threats was not found in laura's mailbox.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten note with threats was not found in Laura's mailbox
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a handwritten note with threats was not found in laura's mailbox.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten note with threats was not found in Laura's mailbox
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a handwritten note with threats was not found in laura's mailbox.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten note with threats was not found in Laura's mailbox
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a handwritten note with threats was not found in laura's mailbox.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten note with threats was not found in Laura's mailbox
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A handwritten note with threats was not found in laura's mailbox, since if a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten note with threats was not found in Laura's mailbox
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A handwritten note with threats was not found in laura's mailbox, because if a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten note with threats was not found in Laura's mailbox
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A handwritten note with threats was not found in laura's mailbox, as if a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten note with threats was not found in Laura's mailbox
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloody glove was discovered in the backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloody glove was discovered in the backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloody glove was discovered in the backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloody glove was discovered in the backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloody glove was discovered in the backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloody glove was discovered in the backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloody glove was discovered in the backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloody glove was discovered in the backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloody glove was discovered in the backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloody glove was discovered in the backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloody glove was discovered in the backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard, since if a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard, because if a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard, as if a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of laura's personal documents
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of laura's personal documents
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of laura's personal documents
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of laura's personal documents
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of laura's personal documents
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of laura's personal documents
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of laura's personal documents
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of laura's personal documents
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of laura's personal documents
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of laura's personal documents
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of laura's personal documents
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore john davis was not in possession of laura's personal documents.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of Laura's personal documents
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence john davis was not in possession of laura's personal documents.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of Laura's personal documents
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus john davis was not in possession of laura's personal documents.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of Laura's personal documents
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that john davis was not in possession of laura's personal documents.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of Laura's personal documents
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so john davis was not in possession of laura's personal documents.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of Laura's personal documents
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that john davis was not in possession of laura's personal documents.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of Laura's personal documents
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that john davis was not in possession of laura's personal documents.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of Laura's personal documents
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that john davis was not in possession of laura's personal documents.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of Laura's personal documents
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis was not in possession of laura's personal documents, since if john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of Laura's personal documents
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis was not in possession of laura's personal documents, because if john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of Laura's personal documents
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis was not in possession of laura's personal documents, as if john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of Laura's personal documents
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor heard a gunshot, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor heard a gunshot
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor heard a gunshot, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor heard a gunshot
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor heard a gunshot, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor heard a gunshot
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor heard a gunshot, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor heard a gunshot
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor heard a gunshot, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor heard a gunshot
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor heard a gunshot, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor heard a gunshot
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor heard a gunshot, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor heard a gunshot
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor heard a gunshot, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor heard a gunshot
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a neighbor heard a gunshot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor heard a gunshot
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a neighbor heard a gunshot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor heard a gunshot
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a neighbor heard a gunshot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor heard a gunshot
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a neighbor did not hear a gunshot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not hear a gunshot
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a neighbor did not hear a gunshot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not hear a gunshot
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a neighbor did not hear a gunshot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not hear a gunshot
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a neighbor did not hear a gunshot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not hear a gunshot
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a neighbor did not hear a gunshot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not hear a gunshot
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a neighbor did not hear a gunshot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not hear a gunshot
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a neighbor did not hear a gunshot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not hear a gunshot
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a neighbor did not hear a gunshot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not hear a gunshot
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A neighbor did not hear a gunshot, since if a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not hear a gunshot
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A neighbor did not hear a gunshot, because if a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not hear a gunshot
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A neighbor did not hear a gunshot, as if a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not hear a gunshot
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's social media accounts were hacked, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's social media accounts were hacked
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's social media accounts were hacked, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's social media accounts were hacked
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's social media accounts were hacked, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's social media accounts were hacked
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's social media accounts were hacked, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's social media accounts were hacked
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's social media accounts were hacked, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's social media accounts were hacked
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's social media accounts were hacked, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's social media accounts were hacked
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's social media accounts were hacked, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's social media accounts were hacked
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's social media accounts were hacked, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's social media accounts were hacked
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if laura's social media accounts were hacked then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's social media accounts were hacked.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's social media accounts were hacked
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if laura's social media accounts were hacked then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's social media accounts were hacked.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's social media accounts were hacked
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if laura's social media accounts were hacked then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's social media accounts were hacked.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's social media accounts were hacked
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.