<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a neighbor's security camera footage does not show a suspicious vehicle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor's security camera footage does not show a suspicious vehicle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a neighbor's security camera footage does not show a suspicious vehicle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor's security camera footage does not show a suspicious vehicle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a neighbor's security camera footage does not show a suspicious vehicle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor's security camera footage does not show a suspicious vehicle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a neighbor's security camera footage does not show a suspicious vehicle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor's security camera footage does not show a suspicious vehicle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a neighbor's security camera footage does not show a suspicious vehicle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor's security camera footage does not show a suspicious vehicle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a neighbor's security camera footage does not show a suspicious vehicle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor's security camera footage does not show a suspicious vehicle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a neighbor's security camera footage does not show a suspicious vehicle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor's security camera footage does not show a suspicious vehicle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a neighbor's security camera footage does not show a suspicious vehicle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor's security camera footage does not show a suspicious vehicle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A neighbor's security camera footage does not show a suspicious vehicle, since if a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor's security camera footage does not show a suspicious vehicle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A neighbor's security camera footage does not show a suspicious vehicle, because if a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor's security camera footage does not show a suspicious vehicle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A neighbor's security camera footage does not show a suspicious vehicle, as if a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor's security camera footage shows a suspicious vehicle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor's security camera footage does not show a suspicious vehicle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore laura's bank account did not have a recent large withdrawal.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's bank account did not have a recent large withdrawal
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence laura's bank account did not have a recent large withdrawal.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's bank account did not have a recent large withdrawal
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus laura's bank account did not have a recent large withdrawal.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's bank account did not have a recent large withdrawal
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that laura's bank account did not have a recent large withdrawal.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's bank account did not have a recent large withdrawal
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so laura's bank account did not have a recent large withdrawal.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's bank account did not have a recent large withdrawal
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that laura's bank account did not have a recent large withdrawal.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's bank account did not have a recent large withdrawal
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that laura's bank account did not have a recent large withdrawal.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's bank account did not have a recent large withdrawal
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that laura's bank account did not have a recent large withdrawal.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's bank account did not have a recent large withdrawal
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's bank account did not have a recent large withdrawal, since if laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's bank account did not have a recent large withdrawal
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's bank account did not have a recent large withdrawal, because if laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's bank account did not have a recent large withdrawal
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's bank account did not have a recent large withdrawal, as if laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank account had a recent large withdrawal then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's bank account did not have a recent large withdrawal
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the coroner's report does not indicate signs of strangulation.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The coroner's report does not indicate signs of strangulation
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the coroner's report does not indicate signs of strangulation.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The coroner's report does not indicate signs of strangulation
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the coroner's report does not indicate signs of strangulation.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The coroner's report does not indicate signs of strangulation
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the coroner's report does not indicate signs of strangulation.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The coroner's report does not indicate signs of strangulation
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the coroner's report does not indicate signs of strangulation.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The coroner's report does not indicate signs of strangulation
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the coroner's report does not indicate signs of strangulation.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The coroner's report does not indicate signs of strangulation
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the coroner's report does not indicate signs of strangulation.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The coroner's report does not indicate signs of strangulation
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the coroner's report does not indicate signs of strangulation.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The coroner's report does not indicate signs of strangulation
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The coroner's report does not indicate signs of strangulation, since if the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The coroner's report does not indicate signs of strangulation
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The coroner's report does not indicate signs of strangulation, because if the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The coroner's report does not indicate signs of strangulation
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The coroner's report does not indicate signs of strangulation, as if the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the coroner's report indicates signs of strangulation then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The coroner's report does not indicate signs of strangulation
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had scratches on his face during the arrest
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had scratches on his face during the arrest
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had scratches on his face during the arrest
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had scratches on his face during the arrest
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had scratches on his face during the arrest
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had scratches on his face during the arrest
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had scratches on his face during the arrest
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had scratches on his face during the arrest
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had scratches on his face during the arrest
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had scratches on his face during the arrest
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had scratches on his face during the arrest
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore john davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence john davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus john davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that john davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so john davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that john davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that john davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that john davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest, since if john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest, because if john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest, as if john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway, since if laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway, because if laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.