triplets
sequence | passage
stringlengths 0
32.9k
| label
stringlengths 4
48
⌀ | label_id
int64 0
1k
⌀ | synonyms
sequence | __index_level_1__
int64 312
64.1k
⌀ | __index_level_0__
int64 0
2.4k
⌀ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
"Battle of Actium",
"participant",
"Marcus Lurius"
] | null | null | null | null | 11 |
|
[
"Battle of Mursa Major",
"participant",
"Ancient Rome"
] | null | null | null | null | 3 |
|
[
"Siege of Antioch (253)",
"different from",
"Siege of Antioch (968–969)"
] | null | null | null | null | 0 |
|
[
"Siege of Antioch (253)",
"different from",
"Siege of Antioch"
] | null | null | null | null | 4 |
|
[
"Siege of Antioch (253)",
"different from",
"Siege of Antioch"
] | null | null | null | null | 5 |
|
[
"Siege of Antioch (253)",
"different from",
"Siege of Antioch"
] | null | null | null | null | 6 |
|
[
"Siege of Antioch (253)",
"different from",
"Siege of Antioch"
] | null | null | null | null | 7 |
|
[
"Siege of Antioch (253)",
"different from",
"Mesopotamian campaigns of Ardashir I"
] | null | null | null | null | 8 |
|
[
"2020 Summer Olympics opening ceremony",
"follows",
"2016 Summer Olympics opening ceremony"
] | null | null | null | null | 4 |
|
[
"2020 Summer Olympics opening ceremony",
"followed by",
"2024 Summer Olympics opening ceremony"
] | null | null | null | null | 5 |
|
[
"Battle of Ctesiphon (263)",
"participant",
"Sasanian Empire"
] | null | null | null | null | 0 |
|
[
"Siege of Tyana (272)",
"participant",
"Palmyrene Empire"
] | The Siege of Tyana occurred in 272 CE. The forces of the Roman Emperor Aurelian were seeking to conquer the Palmyrene Empire. | null | null | null | null | 1 |
[
"Battle of Immae",
"participant",
"Palmyrene Empire"
] | The Battle of Immae was fought in 272 between the Roman army of Emperor Aurelian, and the armies of the Palmyrene Empire, whose leader, Queen Zenobia, had usurped Roman control over the eastern provinces. | null | null | null | null | 1 |
[
"Battle of Ctesiphon (198)",
"participant",
"Ancient Rome"
] | null | null | null | null | 3 |
|
[
"Siege of Nisibis (235)",
"different from",
"Siege of Nisibis"
] | null | null | null | null | 0 |
|
[
"Siege of Nisibis (235)",
"different from",
"Siege of Nisibis"
] | null | null | null | null | 1 |
|
[
"Siege of Nisibis (235)",
"different from",
"Siege of Nisibis"
] | null | null | null | null | 2 |
|
[
"Siege of Nisibis (235)",
"different from",
"Siege of Nisibis (252)"
] | null | null | null | null | 3 |
|
[
"Siege of Senonae",
"participant",
"Alamanni"
] | null | null | null | null | 1 |
|
[
"Incident at the Gaoping Tombs",
"participant",
"Cao Shuang"
] | The Incident at the Gaoping Tombs was a coup d'état that took place on 5 February 249 in the state of Cao Wei during the Three Kingdoms period (220–280) of China. The parties involved were Sima Yi and Cao Shuang, who were both regents for the Cao Wei emperor Cao Fang, who was then about 17 years old. On that day, while Cao Shuang and his brothers accompanied the emperor on a visit to the Gaoping tombs, Sima Yi staged a coup d'état; taking control of the capital city of Luoyang and issuing a memorial which listed out the various crimes Cao Shuang had committed. Cao Shuang surrendered and gave up his powers after further receiving reassurance that he and his family would be spared, thinking that he could still live a life in luxury. Shortly thereafter, Cao Shuang, his brothers, and his supporters were charged with treason and executed along with their families on 9 February. The coup d'état increased the Sima family's influence and paved the way for the eventual replacement of the Cao Wei regime by the Sima family's Jin dynasty in 266. | null | null | null | null | 1 |
[
"Incident at the Gaoping Tombs",
"participant",
"Sima Yi"
] | The Incident at the Gaoping Tombs was a coup d'état that took place on 5 February 249 in the state of Cao Wei during the Three Kingdoms period (220–280) of China. The parties involved were Sima Yi and Cao Shuang, who were both regents for the Cao Wei emperor Cao Fang, who was then about 17 years old. On that day, while Cao Shuang and his brothers accompanied the emperor on a visit to the Gaoping tombs, Sima Yi staged a coup d'état; taking control of the capital city of Luoyang and issuing a memorial which listed out the various crimes Cao Shuang had committed. Cao Shuang surrendered and gave up his powers after further receiving reassurance that he and his family would be spared, thinking that he could still live a life in luxury. Shortly thereafter, Cao Shuang, his brothers, and his supporters were charged with treason and executed along with their families on 9 February. The coup d'état increased the Sima family's influence and paved the way for the eventual replacement of the Cao Wei regime by the Sima family's Jin dynasty in 266. | null | null | null | null | 5 |
[
"Battle of Fei River",
"participant",
"Eastern Jin dynasty"
] | The Battle of Fei River, also known as the Battle of Feishui (simplified Chinese: 淝水之战; traditional Chinese: 淝水之戰; pinyin: Féishǔi zhī zhàn), was a battle in 383 in China, where forces of the Di-led Former Qin dynasty were decisively defeated by the outnumbered army of the Eastern Jin dynasty. The location of the battle, the Fei River, no longer exists but is believed to have flowed through modern Lu'an, Anhui, near the Huai River. The battle is considered to be one of the most significant battles in Chinese history. In the aftermath of the battle, the Former Qin fell into a massive civil war, resulting in its eventual collapse, ensuring the survival of Eastern Jin and subsequent Han-ruled regimes south of the Yangtze River. | null | null | null | null | 3 |
[
"Battle of Cibalae",
"participant",
"Constantine the Great"
] | The Battle of Cibalae was fought in 316 between the two Roman emperors Constantine I (r. 306–337) and Licinius (r. 308–324). The site of the battle, near the town of Cibalae (now Vinkovci, Croatia) in the Roman province of Pannonia Secunda, was approximately 350 kilometers within the territory of Licinius. Constantine won a resounding victory, despite being outnumbered.Background
The hostilities were prompted by Constantine's appointment of his brother-in-law, Bassianus, as Caesar. Bassianus was discovered to be intriguing against Constantine, perhaps at the prodding of his own brother Senecio, a close associate of Licinius. When Constantine demanded that Licinius hand over Senecio, Licinius refused. Constantine marched against Licinius, who responded by elevating another associate, Valens. The date of Valens' elevation as emperor probably occurred after the Battle of Cibalae.
The unreliable fasti of Hydatius dates the battle to 8 October 314, but the remaining literary and numismatic evidence point to the battle being fought in 316. | null | null | null | null | 0 |
[
"Battle of Thyatira",
"participant",
"Ancient Rome"
] | null | null | null | null | 1 |
|
[
"Battle of Thyatira",
"participant",
"Procopius"
] | The Battle of Thyatira was fought in 366 at Thyatira, Lydia (modern Turkey), between the army of the Roman Emperor Valens and the army of the usurper Procopius, led by his general Gomoarius. | null | null | null | null | 3 |
[
"Battle of Constantinople (378)",
"participant",
"Goths"
] | null | null | null | null | 3 |
|
[
"Siege of Adrianople (378)",
"participant",
"Goths"
] | The siege of Adrianople took place in 378 following the Gothic victory at the Battle of Adrianople. Gothic forces were unable to breach the city walls and retreated. It was followed by an unsuccessful Gothic attempt to breach the walls of Constantinople. | null | null | null | null | 0 |
[
"Siege of Adrianople (378)",
"participant",
"Ancient Rome"
] | null | null | null | null | 5 |
|
[
"Battle of Adrianople (324)",
"different from",
"Battle of Adrianople"
] | null | null | null | null | 1 |
|
[
"Battle of Pollentia",
"participant",
"Ancient Rome"
] | null | null | null | null | 0 |
|
[
"Battle of Pollentia",
"participant",
"Visigoths"
] | null | null | null | null | 4 |
|
[
"Battle of Verona (312)",
"participant",
"Roman Empire"
] | null | null | null | null | 3 |
|
[
"Battle of the Margus",
"participant",
"Diocletian"
] | null | null | null | null | 1 |
|
[
"Battle of Cartagena (461)",
"participant",
"Vandals"
] | null | null | null | null | 0 |
|
[
"Battle of Lingones",
"participant",
"Ancient Rome"
] | null | null | null | null | 2 |
|
[
"Battle of Agrigentum (456)",
"participant",
"Western Roman Empire"
] | null | null | null | null | 2 |
|
[
"Battle of Chrysopolis",
"participant",
"Ancient Rome"
] | null | null | null | null | 2 |
|
[
"Battle of Solicinium",
"participant",
"Alamanni"
] | null | null | null | null | 1 |
|
[
"Lex Burgundionum",
"applies to jurisdiction",
"Kingdom of the Burgundians"
] | The Lex Burgundionum (Latin for Burgundian Laws, also Lex Gundobada) refers to the law code of the Burgundians, probably issued by king Gundobad. It is influenced by Roman law and deals with domestic laws concerning marriage and inheritance as well as regulating weregild and other penalties. Interaction between Burgundians is treated separately from interaction between Burgundians and Gallo-Romans. The oldest of the 14 surviving manuscripts of the text dates to the 9th century, but the code's institution is ascribed to king Gundobad (died 516), with a possible revision by his successor Sigismund (died 523). The Lex Romana Burgundionum is a separate code, containing various laws taken from Roman sources, probably intended to apply to the Burgundians' Gallo-Roman subjects. The oldest copy of this text dates to the 7th century. | null | null | null | null | 2 |
[
"Battle of Maserfield",
"participant",
"Kingdom of Mercia"
] | The Battle of Maserfield, a corruption of the Welsh Maes Elferth (Elferth's field, also Welsh: Cad Maes Cogwy) was fought on 5 August 641 or 642 (642 according to Ward) between the Anglo-Saxon kings Oswald of Northumbria and Penda of Mercia allied with Welsh Kingdom of Gwynedd, ending in Oswald's defeat, death, and dismemberment. The location was also known as Cogwy in Welsh, with Welshmen from Pengwern participating in the battle (according to the probably ninth-century Canu Heledd), probably as allies of the Mercians. Bede reports the commonly accepted date given above; the Welsh Annales Cambriae is generally considered incorrect in giving the year of the battle as 644. The site of the battle is traditionally identified with Oswestry; arguments have been made for and against the accuracy of this identification. | null | null | null | null | 1 |
[
"Battle of Maserfield",
"participant",
"Kingdom of Bernicia"
] | null | null | null | null | 3 |
|
[
"Battle of the Nervasos Mountains",
"participant",
"Vandals"
] | null | null | null | null | 1 |
|
[
"Battle of Hatfield Chase",
"participant",
"Anglo-Saxons"
] | null | null | null | null | 1 |
|
[
"Battle of Hatfield Chase",
"participant",
"Welsh people"
] | null | null | null | null | 2 |
|
[
"Salic law",
"applies to jurisdiction",
"Francia"
] | null | null | null | null | 1 |
|
[
"Salic law",
"said to be the same as",
"Salic law"
] | null | null | null | null | 9 |
|
[
"Siege of Hippo Regius",
"participant",
"Vandals"
] | The siege of Hippo Regius was a siege from June 430 to August 431, carried out by the Vandals under their king Genseric against Roman defenders under Boniface, Count of Africa.
Having command of the sea, Boniface was able to keep the city well provisioned and, after 14 months, Genseric was the one short on supplies. The Vandals lifted the siege, making the ordeal a technical Roman victory. However, Boniface quickly abandoned the city by sea to meet with reinforcements from the eastern empire; the Vandals were able to occupy the town and subsequently defeated the combined Roman forces in a set battle.
Among those who died during the siege was St. Augustine. | null | null | null | null | 1 |
[
"Battle of Mu'tah",
"participant",
"Zayd ibn Haritha al-Kalbi"
] | Mobilization of the armies
Muhammad dispatched 3,000 of his troops in the month of Jumada al-Awwal 7 (AH), 629 (CE), for a quick expedition to attack and punish the tribes for the murder of his emissary by the Ghassanids. The army was led by Zayd ibn Harithah; the second-in-command was Ja'far ibn Abi Talib and the third-in-command was Abd Allah ibn Rawahah. When the Muslim troops arrived at the area to the east of Jordan and learned of the size of the Byzantine army, they wanted to wait and send for reinforcements from Medina. 'Abdullah ibn Rawahah reminded them about their desire for martyrdom and questioned the move to wait when what they desire was awaiting them, so they continued marching towards the waiting army.Battle
The Muslims engaged the Byzantines at their camp by the village of Musharif and then withdrew towards Mu'tah. It was here that the two armies fought. Some Muslim sources report that the battle was fought in a valley between two heights, which negated the Byzantines' numerical superiority. During the battle, all three Muslim leaders fell one after the other as they took command of the force: first, Zayd, then Ja'far, then 'Abdullah. After the death of 'Abdullah, the Muslim soldiers were in danger of being routed. Thabit ibn Aqram, seeing the desperate state of the Muslim forces, took up the banner and rallied his comrades, thus saving the army from complete destruction. After the battle, ibn Aqram took the banner, before asking Khalid ibn al-Walid to take the lead. | null | null | null | null | 2 |
[
"Battle of Mu'tah",
"participant",
"'Abd Allah ibn Rawahah"
] | Mobilization of the armies
Muhammad dispatched 3,000 of his troops in the month of Jumada al-Awwal 7 (AH), 629 (CE), for a quick expedition to attack and punish the tribes for the murder of his emissary by the Ghassanids. The army was led by Zayd ibn Harithah; the second-in-command was Ja'far ibn Abi Talib and the third-in-command was Abd Allah ibn Rawahah. When the Muslim troops arrived at the area to the east of Jordan and learned of the size of the Byzantine army, they wanted to wait and send for reinforcements from Medina. 'Abdullah ibn Rawahah reminded them about their desire for martyrdom and questioned the move to wait when what they desire was awaiting them, so they continued marching towards the waiting army.Battle
The Muslims engaged the Byzantines at their camp by the village of Musharif and then withdrew towards Mu'tah. It was here that the two armies fought. Some Muslim sources report that the battle was fought in a valley between two heights, which negated the Byzantines' numerical superiority. During the battle, all three Muslim leaders fell one after the other as they took command of the force: first, Zayd, then Ja'far, then 'Abdullah. After the death of 'Abdullah, the Muslim soldiers were in danger of being routed. Thabit ibn Aqram, seeing the desperate state of the Muslim forces, took up the banner and rallied his comrades, thus saving the army from complete destruction. After the battle, ibn Aqram took the banner, before asking Khalid ibn al-Walid to take the lead. | null | null | null | null | 3 |
[
"Battle of Mu'tah",
"participant",
"Ja'far ibn Abī Tālib"
] | Mobilization of the armies
Muhammad dispatched 3,000 of his troops in the month of Jumada al-Awwal 7 (AH), 629 (CE), for a quick expedition to attack and punish the tribes for the murder of his emissary by the Ghassanids. The army was led by Zayd ibn Harithah; the second-in-command was Ja'far ibn Abi Talib and the third-in-command was Abd Allah ibn Rawahah. When the Muslim troops arrived at the area to the east of Jordan and learned of the size of the Byzantine army, they wanted to wait and send for reinforcements from Medina. 'Abdullah ibn Rawahah reminded them about their desire for martyrdom and questioned the move to wait when what they desire was awaiting them, so they continued marching towards the waiting army.Battle
The Muslims engaged the Byzantines at their camp by the village of Musharif and then withdrew towards Mu'tah. It was here that the two armies fought. Some Muslim sources report that the battle was fought in a valley between two heights, which negated the Byzantines' numerical superiority. During the battle, all three Muslim leaders fell one after the other as they took command of the force: first, Zayd, then Ja'far, then 'Abdullah. After the death of 'Abdullah, the Muslim soldiers were in danger of being routed. Thabit ibn Aqram, seeing the desperate state of the Muslim forces, took up the banner and rallied his comrades, thus saving the army from complete destruction. After the battle, ibn Aqram took the banner, before asking Khalid ibn al-Walid to take the lead. | null | null | null | null | 4 |
[
"Battle of Melantias",
"participant",
"Kutrigurs"
] | null | null | null | null | 1 |
|
[
"Battle of Melantias",
"participant",
"Byzantine army"
] | Background
During the winter of 558, Zabergan led a substantial Kutrigur army which crossed the frozen Danube. This army invaded Moesia and Thrace, threatening Constantinople itself. Emperor Justinian I recalled Belisarius from retirement. Belisarius led a small force of 300 veterans, together with locally raised levies, to drive the Kutrigurs from the Theodosian Walls.The Battle
Belisarius decided to advance to meet the Kutrigurs and set up his camp a few kilometers from his opponent in Melantias, a settlement about 20 miles from Constantinople. Zabergan wanted to take the Byzantines by surprise and left his camp with 2,000 horsemen, but he was in turn taken by surprise by Belisarius. Upon encountering the Byzantines, the horsemen began to close in on the limited front of veterans but were then attacked by hidden wings of slingers and javelin men. This caused the riders ranks to close and become entangled in a mass. At this point, according to the Byzantine historian Agathias, Belisarius used a stratagem to make the Kutrigurs believe that they were facing a sizeable force; he asked local peasants to scatter in the forest and hit the trees to make a lot of dust in order to scare the horses of the Kutrigurs. The unit of Kutrigurs who approached the area panicked and many were killed. | null | null | null | null | 2 |
[
"Battle of Coronate",
"participant",
"Kingdom of the Lombards"
] | The Battle of Coronate took place in 689, after King Cunicpert returned from exile and ousted Alahis, Usurper King and Duke of Trent, from the capital Pavia.Duke Alahis fled towards the east, into Austria. There he assembled an army to march against the king. Within the same year, Alahis crossed the River Adda, the border between Neustria and Austria, and faced Cunincpert in the plain of Coronate.Wishing to spare the Lombard blood of so many, Cunincpert offered Alahis to engage him in single combat. But Alahis refused and both camps prepared for battle. Fearing for Cunincpert's life, a deacon named Seno begged the king to lend him his armor, so that he, the deacon, appeared to be the king and distract all troubles from Cunincpert. Finally, Cunincpert agreed to that plan and battle was joined. | null | null | null | null | 2 |
[
"Siege of Exeter (c. 630)",
"different from",
"Siege of Exeter"
] | null | null | null | null | 1 |
|
[
"Siege of Exeter (c. 630)",
"different from",
"Siege of Exeter"
] | null | null | null | null | 2 |
|
[
"Siege of Aleppo (637)",
"different from",
"Sack of Aleppo (1400)"
] | null | null | null | null | 1 |
|
[
"Siege of Aleppo (637)",
"different from",
"Siege of Aleppo"
] | null | null | null | null | 5 |
|
[
"Siege of Aleppo (637)",
"different from",
"Siege of Aleppo"
] | null | null | null | null | 6 |
|
[
"Siege of Aleppo (637)",
"different from",
"Siege of Aleppo"
] | null | null | null | null | 7 |
|
[
"Siege of Aleppo (637)",
"different from",
"Siege of Aleppo (994–995)"
] | null | null | null | null | 8 |
|
[
"Battle of Tricamarum",
"participant",
"Byzantine Empire"
] | The Battle of Tricamarum took place on December 15, 533 between the armies of the Byzantine Empire, under Belisarius, and the Vandal Kingdom, commanded by King Gelimer, and his brother Tzazon. It followed the Byzantine victory at the Battle of Ad Decimum, and eliminated the power of the Vandals for good, completing the reconquest of North Africa under the Byzantine Emperor Justinian I. The main contemporary source for the battle is Procopius, De Bello Vandalico, which occupies Books III and IV of his magisterial Wars of Justinian. | null | null | null | null | 2 |
[
"Battle of Bensington",
"participant",
"Kingdom of Mercia"
] | null | null | null | null | 0 |
|
[
"Battle of Bensington",
"participant",
"Kingdom of Wessex"
] | null | null | null | null | 1 |
|
[
"Battle of the Unstrut River (531)",
"participant",
"Merovingian dynasty"
] | null | null | null | null | 0 |
|
[
"Battle of Badr",
"participant",
"Mecca"
] | null | null | null | null | 0 |
|
[
"Battle of Badr",
"topic's main category",
"Category:Battle of Badr"
] | null | null | null | null | 7 |
|
[
"Battle of Badr",
"participant",
"Medina community"
] | null | null | null | null | 8 |
|
[
"Lex Thuringorum",
"applies to jurisdiction",
"Duchy of Thuringia"
] | null | null | null | null | 1 |
|
[
"Battle of Fakhkh",
"participant",
"Abbasid Caliphate"
] | null | null | null | null | 0 |
|
[
"Battle of Fakhkh",
"participant",
"Alids"
] | null | null | null | null | 2 |
|
[
"Battle of Vézeronce",
"participant",
"Kingdom of the Burgundians"
] | The Battle of Vézeronce took place on June 25, 524 AD near Vézeronce-Curtin (then Veseruntia) in Isère, France. This battle was part of an invasion of Burgundy initiated by the four successors of the Frankish king Clovis I: Childebert I, Chlodomer, Chlothar I, and Theuderic I.
The previous Burgundian king, Sigismund, had been executed by the Franks, and was succeeded by his brother, Godomar. Godomar led the Burgundian army and defeated the Franks, with Chlodomer killed during the combat. However, the kingdom was lost to the Merovingians within a decade.
A helmet was found in the peat marsh of Saint-Didier, to the north of the battle site in 1871, and is conserved in the Musée dauphinois, Grenoble. The helmet is of Byzantine craftsmanship, and was likely that of a Frankish chieftain. | null | null | null | null | 1 |
[
"Lex Alamannorum",
"applies to jurisdiction",
"Alamanni"
] | The Lex Alamannorum and Pactus Alamannorum were two early medieval law codes of the Alamanni. They were first edited in parts in 1530 by Johannes Sichard in Basel.Pactus Alamannorum
The Pactus Alamannorum or Pactus legis Alamannorum is the older of the two codes, dating to the early 7th century. It is preserved in a single manuscript of the 9th to 10th century (Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale de France, MS Lat. 10753).Lex Alamannorum
The Lex Alamannorum is preserved in some 50 manuscripts dating to between the 8th and 12th centuries. The text's first redaction is ascribed to the Alamannic duke Lantfrid in ca. 730. It is divided into clerical law, ducal law and popular law.
Chapter 3.1 treats church asylum: no fugitive seeking refuge in a church should be removed by force, or be killed within the church. Instead, the pursuers should assure the priest that the fugitive's guilt is forgiven. In 3.3, penalties for the violation of the asylum are set at 36 solidi to be paid to the church and an additional 40 solidi to be paid to the authorities for violation of the law.
Chapter 56.1 regulates penalties for violence towards women. If someone uncovers the head of a free, unmarried woman, he is fined 6 solidi. If he lifts her dress so that her genitals or her buttocks become visible, he is fined 12 solidi. If he rapes her, he is fined 40 solidi. 56.2 doubles these penalties if the victim is a married woman. | null | null | null | null | 2 |
[
"Battle of Mamma",
"participant",
"Kingdom of Altava"
] | The Battle of Mamma or the Battle of Mammes (Arabic: معركة ممس) took place in 688 between the Arab Muslim forces of the Umayyad Caliphate and the Berbers led by Caecilius of the Kingdom of Altava. | null | null | null | null | 3 |
[
"Battle of Mamma",
"participant",
"Umayyad Caliphate"
] | The Battle of Mamma or the Battle of Mammes (Arabic: معركة ممس) took place in 688 between the Arab Muslim forces of the Umayyad Caliphate and the Berbers led by Caecilius of the Kingdom of Altava. | null | null | null | null | 6 |
[
"Battle of Guadalete",
"participant",
"Visigothic Kingdom"
] | null | null | null | null | 1 |
|
[
"Battle of Guadalete",
"participant",
"Umayyad Caliphate"
] | null | null | null | null | 6 |
|
[
"Battle of Uhud",
"topic's main category",
"Category:Battle of Uhud"
] | null | null | null | null | 3 |
|
[
"Iwai Rebellion",
"participant",
"Tsukushi no Iwai"
] | null | null | null | null | 1 |
|
[
"Iwai Rebellion",
"participant",
"Mononobe no Arakabi"
] | Rebellion
At the beginning of the 6th century, the rising Silla kingdom began to threaten Japanese possessions in Korea. In 512, four districts of the Japanese colony of Mimana surrendered to the Koreans, and the remaining Japanese possessions came under siege. At the same time, the kingdom of Paekje, a Japanese vassal, was attacked from two sides by the kingdoms of Silla and Goguryeo, and sent 513 Confucian scholars to Yamato with a request for help - they brought with them the first books, and thus literacy came to Japan. Before Yamato could send aid to Mimana and Paekje, Iwai, the governor of the Tsukushi region (semi-autonomous Kumaso region in northern Kyushu), made a treacherous alliance with the Silla kingdom, thus blocking the Yamato kingdom's attempts to send aid to Korea. This was the first recorded rebellion against the ruling Yamato dynasty. Mononobe no Arakabi, the leader of a warrior clan, was sent to quell the rebellion. In 528, Iwai was overthrown and executed, and the previous autonomy of his area ended with the establishment of Daizafu Fortress, a government military stronghold on the island of Kyushu. | null | null | null | null | 5 |
[
"Battle of Islandbridge",
"participant",
"Vikings"
] | null | null | null | null | 0 |
|
[
"Battle of Jengland",
"participant",
"Duchy of Brittany"
] | The Battle of Jengland (also called Jengland-Beslé, Beslé, or Grand Fougeray) took place on 22 August 851, between the Frankish army of Charles the Bald and the Breton army of Erispoe, Duke of Brittany. The Bretons were victorious, leading to the signing of the Treaty of Angers in September 851 which secured Breton independence. | null | null | null | null | 1 |
[
"Battle of Achelous (917)",
"participant",
"Byzantine Empire"
] | null | null | null | null | 0 |
|
[
"Battle of Achelous (917)",
"participant",
"First Bulgarian Empire"
] | null | null | null | null | 4 |
|
[
"Battle of Tettenhall",
"participant",
"Danelaw"
] | null | null | null | null | 2 |
|
[
"Siege of Rome (549–550)",
"different from",
"siege of Rome (472)"
] | null | null | null | null | 2 |
|
[
"Siege of Rome (549–550)",
"different from",
"Sack of Rome, 1527"
] | null | null | null | null | 4 |
|
[
"Siege of Rome (549–550)",
"different from",
"Siege of Rome (537-538)"
] | null | null | null | null | 5 |
|
[
"Siege of Rome (549–550)",
"different from",
"Siege of Rome (390 BC)"
] | null | null | null | null | 6 |
|
[
"Siege of Rome (549–550)",
"different from",
"Siege of Rome (1849)"
] | null | null | null | null | 7 |
|
[
"Battle of Lechfeld (910)",
"participant",
"Holy Roman Empire"
] | null | null | null | null | 0 |
|
[
"Battle of Toulouse (721)",
"different from",
"Battle of Toulouse"
] | null | null | null | null | 6 |
|
[
"Battle of Toulouse (721)",
"participant",
"Duchy of Aquitaine"
] | null | null | null | null | 7 |
|
[
"Battle of Ballon",
"participant",
"Duchy of Brittany"
] | null | null | null | null | 1 |
|
[
"Battle of Kupa",
"participant",
"Borna of Croatia"
] | The Battle of Kupa occurred at Kupa river in 819. It involved Frankish vassal Duke Borna of Dalmatia, with an army of Guduscani, against the advancing army of Frankish rebel, Duke Ljudevit of the Slavs in Lower Pannonia. During the battle, the Guduscans abandoned Borna and joined Ljudevit. While Borna's forces suffered massive losses, he managed to escape with his bodyguards. However, Dragomuž, Ljudevit's father-in-law, who sided with Borna, was killed. Ljudevit suffered heavy casualties that included 3,000 soldiers and over 300 horses. Afterwards, Ljudevit used the momentum to invade Dalmatia in December 819. | null | null | null | null | 0 |
[
"Battle of Kupa",
"participant",
"Ljudevit Posavski"
] | null | null | null | null | 3 |
|
[
"Battle of Rednitz",
"participant",
"Holy Roman Empire"
] | null | null | null | null | 0 |
|
[
"Battle of Andernach",
"participant",
"Holy Roman Empire"
] | null | null | null | null | 0 |
|
[
"Rus'–Byzantine Treaty (945)",
"participant",
"Byzantine Empire"
] | null | null | null | null | 1 |
|
[
"Rus'–Byzantine Treaty (945)",
"participant",
"Kievan Rus'"
] | null | null | null | null | 4 |
|
[
"Battle of York (867)",
"immediate cause of",
"death"
] | null | null | null | null | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.