text
stringlengths
7
5k
degree_of_toxicity
float64
0
1
contains_offensive_word
int64
0
1
label
int64
0
1
CLEARY diz princess iz a bad bitch. http://t.co/jV1SA1b2xw
0.973385
1
1
JP GORDON IS A JEW LOVING KIKE FAGGOT LOSER. WASTES HIS TIME ON A FREE WEBSITE FOR COCKSUCKING JEWS
0.996777
1
1
Sources explicitly criticized brief mention brief mention and dismissal From John D. Hawks
0.000556
0
0
Shut up and mind you own business to idiot, your going to be blocked for breaking the 3RR on the Brett Favre page along with PSUMark2006, you were not fixing vandalism, so that requires a suspension and you better quit bothering me, starwars1955
0.973459
1
1
Bad bitch give good head, dumb bitch get hood rich
0.99853
1
1
“@DevJayAintShit: these hoes ain't loyal 😭 https://t.co/hiMKk7fYxB”😭
0.358815
1
1
o ok. so theres really no way to personally make a source?
0.000829
0
0
There is no logic, it all stems from nationalistic bias and mob rule
0.000964
0
0
Republic May I ask why you deleted the article of 'Republic, The Campaign for an elected head of state'?
0.000707
0
0
" It's a lost cause, guys; power-trippers, pointy-haired clueless bosses, unveiled al-takeyya propagandists, and assorted other lying assholes and ""fact-massagers"" run this place now. And Feloneous? Your suggestion of servility danged on your own talk page merits a ""You can suck my cockonce more, with *feeling*"" rejoinder. The *mechanics* of the thing mandate Wiki becoming just another place with inmate's-shit-smeared walls; and there'll be no great loss in just blowing the place off because, unlike REAL earth-space, the internet is infinite. When it bellies-up, there will be a dozen better replacements for it. "
0.834483
1
1
You're a Douchebag If this is a person, you're a douchebag. If it's run by a person, then (s)he is a douchebag.
0.958898
1
1
" And I uderstand the policy of Wikipedia. A name can be considered as widely accepted if a neutral and reliable source states: ""X is the name most often used for this entity"". Without such an assertion, the following methods (not listed in any particular order) may be helpful in establishing a widely accepted name This makes sense , but stil I just can't acept it. Kiev (Russian: Киев) or official Kyiv (Ukrainian: About this sound Київ (help·info) IPA: [ˈkɪjiw] - non-sense. Why should russian way of pronunciation be the official name if the country is Ukraine and the only one officail language is ukrainian? I am not asking just to wipe out Kiev from the list, but Kyiv should be the main one and the Kiev - alternate. "
0.000617
0
0
@KoiyaThePerv exactly so tweet some other shit fuck all that don't be like everybody this ain't monkey see monkey do koiya
0.997917
1
1
At Dunkin donuts and every time somebody walked in I either yelled ratchet or hoe and so me and my brother got kicked out 😂😂😂
0.0312
0
1
Vandalism Can those persons who have a distaste for Rumsfeld's being please refrain from vandalism in the main page. It ill becomes those of us who disagree with his politics to resort to statements such as 'RUMSFELD IS A WAR CRIMINAL'. Arguable, but belongs on the discussion page with accompanied facts.
0.002151
0
0
This niggah better remember to bring his sperrys
0.957001
1
1
Thank you, . I hope that you and yours have enjoyed the holiday season (so far) and have the happiest of new years! —  Talk/Stalk
0.000784
0
0
RT @LuckyLanceJ: Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. @DrMayaAngelou
0.996664
1
1
Please wait I will update the article.
0.000555
0
0
I HAVE A HARD ON FOR WAR SUP, NIGGS?????????????????????111111111111111111111111
0.129196
1
1
RT @Doctor_Johnson_: You can't appreciate a woman if you're entertaining hoes.
0.329099
1
1
(18th century cricketer) to (18th-century cricketer) Would there be any objection to moving this article to T. Southam (18th-century cricketer)? Since 18th and century are working together as a compound adjective before the noun cricketer, it should be hyphenated. T. Southam (18th century cricketer) would remain as a redirect to the new title. If there's a consensus, or at least no objection, I'll make the move in about a week. Thank you.
0.000536
0
0
Shyyyyyt, 12 hours ain't no hoe... «@_SHAYALICIOUS_ This fulltime..12/hr plus overtime and benefits sounds real good to me»
0.004212
0
1
Life is too fuckin short for free bird
0.992299
1
1
Good Morning to you hoes and pimps.
0.14181
1
1
Can we get this page protected I'm talking about the untitled Batman Begins sequel as this user keeps posting B.S about Michael Keaton, Robin Williams and Mark Hamill being considered for the role of The Joker in the movie. He puts up articles on other sites (which have surprisingly come up today when I warned him about his vandalising and being blocked for it) to try and cover his vandalising tracks. Now I'm not saying let's block him, I'm saying lets protect the page Batman Begins oh and as for Bob Orton Jr. Bob Orton Jr. I'm sorry my answer is no, because lil crazy thing keeps deleting anything I put up in those pages. She's harrasing me by excluding me from editing the pages with truthful facts that she likes to edit! So my answer is no
0.002579
0
0
" I was talking about the Epoch Times reporter Matt Robertson whom have repeatedly deleted my edits in the past, apparently in bad faith. I stopped editing because of that. It is well documented fact that in the past self-professed Falun Gong disciples have attempted to ""circle the wagon"" on Falun Gong related pages, and my decision to stop editing is proof against any accusation of ""agenda"" levied against me. Simply put, if I am again prevented from good faith participation and adding facts I feel are relevant to the topic, I will simply stop editing again, and let those who do not believe in the spirit of participatory knowledge to cause chaos, to the point of requiring administrative intervention. So, have any of my recent edits made so far violate any WP standards? I've commented in talk extensively about edits I propse, and have reached agreement with editor TheSoundAndTheFurry on some of these edits (for example the POV pushing ""we were not paid"" edit made by certain editor was removed after our discussion.) But feel free critique my edits, improve them. All I ask is for a little balance of facts towards NPOV, that is all. And also feel free to use what I wrote here to sandbag me in complaints 8-) "
0.000732
0
0
Map I would like to see a map of europe before and after the treaty.
0.000582
0
0
What do you mean vandalizing? I asked a question here, relax. 71.72.172.177
0.001623
0
0
Lisa Williams is a total fraud No offense intended but are you fucking insane?? She talks with the late Diana! This kind of fake Liza Minelli look a likes should be fucking banned from wikipedia as they are all frauds. Are you an American?
0.997299
1
1
U see a super bad bitch in the club with a nigga that u just can't understand how he got her 99% chance he meet her at #happyhour
0.974355
1
1
#TheMostAnnoyingThingsInLife people who are NEVER happy and bitch-n-moan 100% of the time.
0.945432
1
1
":It seems that you are right that the words of Rawat's mother were added not mixed with, which leaves open the possibility of being obviously and thus deceptively interwoven, but added to some quotes of Rawat's in the quotes section of EPO. But even a cynic like yourself must concede that it was probably an honest mistake. First, there isn't a single other case of false attribution, mistaken or otherwise, that's ever been made out against EPO that I can recall. John and Jean-Michel who've done most, if not all, the work have been meticulous throughout. Plus, they have openly invited corrections if and when any mistakes were noted. This is an opportunity for you, then, to make EPO even better. Congratulations for doing a small part in bringing the truth about Rawat to the general publice. Also, the Mata Ji quote is in a set of sample quotes from the book, Who Is Guru Maharaj Ji?. It is just that. The only error is that the quotes are in the section of Rawat's own quotes and not the more general category of all quotes of interest. In other words a simple mistake just like you said. On the other hand, you also make accusations of quotes ""out of context"". You have offered no support at all for this accusation. It's time you did or gave up that scurrilous accusation. On that score, you also alleged that the editors of the above book themselves wrote some of the quotes in question. Where's your evidence for that? I say there's none and if you know better now's the time to show your proof. Otherwise, why say it? But what's really funny is how you yourself are so clearly guilty of doing just that, taking quotes out of context. For some reason you felt compelled to drag in comments from an ex-premie forum here. Whatever the wisdom of that, you'd think you, a serious academic with a keen eye for ""contextual abuse"" would know better than to say that I said you ""need to be slapped in the face"" when what I really said was: ""Her entire thesis is offensive and unsubstantiated by the evidence. She deserves the academic equivalent of a slap in the face."" (My emphasis). If you can't tell the difference, you're not fit to do the kind of careful analysis you purport to do. If you can tell the difference, you're being purposely misleading and provocative. Your choice. "
0.048811
0
0
and that if you do, I will not violate Wikipedia's COC ever again
0.023021
0
0
2005 (UTC) The Objectivist view of Robin Hood is, to my knowledge, the only one that casts the Robin Hood of legend in a less-than-favorable light. NPOV requires that an article refrain from making value judgments (value judgments are importantwithout them our actions would be random and pointlessbut encyclopedia articles are there to provide us with the information so we each make our own value judgments, not to make the judgments for us). 15:56, 24 December
0.000669
0
0
All this talk about reformulating the article is nice, but unless there are citations, another self appointed member of the language police will edit the article. Please look at some of the past variations of this article and you will notice that the language police always return to the article.
0.00054
0
0
RT @Nigel_D: RT: @JoeBudden I just wanna state for the record that I don’t have any hoes. - http://t.co/pcd2slVKxy
0.023851
0
1
@Hovaa_ that's very logical because bitches love using my face as a toilet
0.982586
1
1
Gucci fucked a lot more famous bitches but he the type to not have to speak on it.Wonder who opened their mouth?
0.996757
1
1
Im trying to come back as a fine ass bitch next lifetime....
0.993625
1
1
You can expect me to be a total bitch towards you now yet again.
0.981567
1
1
thank you very much, the reference is about the Scotland guy in St Kilda.
0.000519
0
0
), Creag an Dorain (Craigendoran
0.002298
0
0
"== October 2009 == I saw your evil edit to Thomas and the Magic Railroad and you will be assigned to ""correct-your-editing"" school. Stop your stupid edits or else you will be blocked from editing by a sysop. "
0.884254
1
1
They are not 'immigrants' they are invaders. #sendthemback @user @user #auspol
0.030578
0
1
Blank pages, blank look I haven't blanked any pages, and yet you keep mucking up my Talk Page with demands that I quit blanking pages. Get a life! Leave me alone!
0.70864
1
1
" I have answered your comment on my talk page, if you're interested, although apparently you're far too hot-headed to listen to reason and discuss like a normal, mature individual. I'm sorry you are not able to communicate. —·?·!·@ "
0.030839
0
0
I'm pissed off bitches on my dick but shit my dick soft CAUSE THE WAY YOU CARRY YOURSELF GOT ME TICKED OFF I ain't tryin to be Rick Ross...
0.997474
1
1
Colossal Penis Superscript textSuperscript textSuperscript textSuperscript textStrike-through text#REDIRECT [[#REDIRECT Insert text 82.40.14.172 ]]Penis
0.748253
1
1
Hamas - Palestinian right of resistance Recently, I have removed (07-2014) Hamas from the list of terrorist organization on the article War on Terror. The reason for this removal is because Hamas is an Islamic foundation founded by the late Ahmed Yassin and dr. Rantissi (both were assassinated by Israel). The election victory of Hamas in the Gaza-strip allowed the party to rule the power on to the Palestinian people since 2006. Also the Hamas party is doing charity works for the poor, disabled and children. I can not believe that this party still has not been removed of the list of terrorist organization by the United States, European Union and Japan. This party deserve a chance to rule together with Fatah to maintain a Palestinian unity.  Dougweller, do you believe the killing and bloodshed of 15 innocent lives (women and children) on an United Nations school on 24-07-2014 by Israel is not an act of terrorism ? Beit Hanoun in Gaza.
0.003682
0
0
"Much of the history article is taken directly from Hillsdale's website, and I would agree that much of it reads like an advertisement, but, in all fairness, there really hasn't been enough published on Hillsdale apart from the college itself. I have tried doing EBSCO host searches and have looked for titles in my university library (the largest library in my state, mind you), and I have been unable to find a single title that is exclusively about Hillsdale College. I suspect the reason is that, while it was once a radical college, it has become more conservative as the world has changed. It was expected to become more radical, in the way that Antioch College did; but it didn't. I think that the best solution is for outsiders to acknowledge Hillsdale's impressive history while still writing about it from an objective point-of-view. If there are other people willing to write about the school, there will be less need to visit the ""Imprimis"" website to compose a wikipedia article on the subject. "
0.000562
0
0
ATTENTION: owners of this site You may want to take mod rights away from this guy, he is abusing his powers by reverting several factual edits all over the site.
0.001032
0
0
Fuck you Fuck you racist basterd.
0.998804
1
1
", 18 November 2006 (UTC) By Lattier's manip/demanip theorem, I can show that operations with 0 ""remain meaningless"". Let x = 2. 0 * x = 0. Then we ""demanipulate"", x = 0/0. Hence, 0 is not ""demanipulable"", and thus it remains meaningless. QED. 16:24"
0.000717
0
0
" That's very odd – I've never noticed that before. The weight is done via Template:Convert, so it must be a problem on that end. I'd suggest mentioning it at Template talk:Convert. VampireHeart "
0.000589
0
0
Get A Life! l00zer
0.853687
1
1
WHAT MUST I DO ????/ CONSEMNSUS BECAUSE?/...WHAT DID I DO WROGN???/ DID I ADD FALSE INFORMATION????????? PLEASE TELL ME WHAT HAVE I DONE TO BE TREATED LIKE THIS?..VANDALISM? OF WHAT VANDALISM?..I HAVE ADDED CORRECT INFORMATION AND DELETED SLANDEROUS AND DEFAMATORY TEXTX AS REQUESTED IN THE PAGE....WHATT CONSENSUS MUST I GET..AND WITH WHO???
0.145425
1
1
NOT REAL THIS GLOBAL WARMING YOU NON GOD FEARING DEMOCRATS TALK ABOUT IS FAKE! - PRESIDENT GEORGE WALKER BUSH
0.832398
1
1
" ""claims""? ""refusing""? He said he isn't the inventor ... therefore he isn't the inventor. He also noted that the rest of the article is wrong ... the code that it is claimed won't compile will compile, and the actual problem (that something like std::string::operator<< can't be found without ADL) is not discussed. 96.248.226.133 "
0.000916
0
0
My newsletters go here.
0.000611
0
0
By Aristotelian standards, the pathos has to be quite severe and make the sufferer realize the flaws inside themselves, but it does not have to lead inevitably to ruin or death
0.011209
0
0
dawg you better shut up dont make fun of the US even though im not American aand DONT BE CALLING ME NO FUCKING DISHWASHER OR KICK YOUR FUCKING MONKEY ASS
0.998369
1
1
76.83.198.185 Vandalism When i reported ip 76.83.198.185 for vandalism yo uremoved it saying there was no recent vandalism but if you look at the edit he did yesterday on Cole Hawkins under external links you will find a sexualy explict addition that is not factual and considering that his final warning was on the 14th and he had a history of secualy explict vansalism of actors i belive that this ip should be banned but i will respect your decisions a moderator
0.001955
0
0
I got good credit. So my bitch credit gotta match mine
0.908321
1
1
hey asshole..dont' you have any thing better to do??? like getting laid??? or jacking off to some Milly fakes???76.223.244.183
0.997864
1
1
I disagree. I think the iconic 1960s Dylan is the most important and recognizable photo to have heading the article. This is a matter that has been discussed here before, and I think the last discussion settled on the 1960s Dylan to head the article. (Which is not to say that, given the right photo(s), the discussion might not go the other way this time.) There are more recent photos further down in the article; perhaps they could be given more prominence. And yes, you are correct, it looks like the lead photo is just a cropped version of the photo with Joan Baez. This isn't ideal, perhaps it could be fixed by changing one photo or the other.
0.00055
0
0
yeah i now January 12th is the physical copy of the single. But Febuary 9th is the album release date in Australia. I rang the record company here in Australia and they confirmed that Febuary 9th was the albums release date. (218.215.3.77 )
0.000577
0
0
The article is listed in Category:Articles created via the Article Wizard under L. DEFAULTSORT is a magic word that sorts the page list in a category using the sort key provided. Because Robert C. Lautman has {{DEFAULTSORT:Lautman, Robert C.}}, it will be sorted under L in all categories it appears in by default. I don't think the missing date changed whether or not the article was reviewed by someone. Adding the date parameter put the page in the Category:Unreviewed new articles from December 2009 instead of the undated Category:Unreviewed new articles. I see now there is a backlog of unreviewed articles going back as far as October, so I don't think people looking at those categories would get to it any earlier just because the template was dated or not. talk
0.00058
0
0
Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad.
0.998316
1
1
Lol my brothers just said he a pussy ass niga well in the words of wizdom I second dat lmaoo leave u hurt out here
0.988057
1
1
I don't have no type .. Bad bitches is the only thing I like !!
0.977968
1
1
RT @FleeBiscuit: Girls with anchor tats are hoes
0.685946
1
1
Hello Chris, I´ve resised my article and really hope, it is o.k. now. Many thanks for your help.
0.00059
0
0
Reply Well it seems a bit wrong. And also: I've had problems with TJ in the past, in my opinion it's bad faith for him add it after I had just removed the cruft once again. I started a talk page discussion, if you care to comment there.
0.000573
0
0
I don't talk to niccas I talk to god we can relate
0.000805
0
1
She feelin a young niggah
0.906626
1
1
.@USER If his Constituents support him they are as craven as he is. If they don't they need to VOTE HIM OUT!
0.007584
0
1
Indirect ass little bitches, like you know my fucking number and where I live.
0.998185
1
1
because stupid assumptions like your faggot goth ass makes doesn't account as a reliable source you stupid fuck. shut the hell up before i beat the shit out of you for fun you dumb nigger coon emo cunt
0.998794
1
1
@QueChele u know how Hispanics be takin All the jobs these niggers won't? Yeah, somethin like a hispanic
0.964579
1
1
You stupid Chinese Wannabe If you're Vietnamese, just admit it. Why pull little tricks like putting Vietnamese characters in every Chinese article you can find? And giving yourself a fake Chinese/Japanese name is even more pathetic. Rei Hideki my ass... You know I knew someone just like you. He was Vietnamese, but he insisted he was really Chinese. He even changed his facebook name to some fake computer-generated Chinese name. He asked only Chinese/Japanese girls out, and his profile pictures were of Chinese/Korean celebrities. He refused to have anything to do with non-East Asian people. Gee, when do people like you ever give up?! I'm Chinese and I'm very proud of it, I don't pretend to be anything else!! What the fuck is up with Vietnamese kids like you...
0.997045
1
1
" ""Bradshaw's 6 yard go ahead touchdown run with 57 seconds left helped lead the New York Giants over the New England Patriots in Super Bowl XLVI"" True enough - but should the article perhaps point out that he was trying not to score at the time... "
0.000809
0
0
" The facts are what I am adding, documented. Not biased statements, such as ""young aspiring author"" description of Stella Randolph, Whitehead researcher. She was nearly forty and was a journalist and educator. Etc. This article is old and biased, it needs updating to incorporate Jane's findings. If it takes an editing war to get to the documented truth, so be it."
0.000689
0
0
"== Removing Dyer references == I propose removing from the references section the books written by Dyer. I have not read Dyer's books, but from what Node_ue says, it seems to me that he's just a crank. He appears to have no clue in linguistics. I don't think a sane linguist would take two random people, put them to translate a text from Yiddish, compare the resulting texts and get to the conclusion: ""yep, we have two different languages"". Also, he uses made-up expressions such as ""sovetul (sic!) de deputaţi"" or ""cuvinte slujitoare"" to prove his points, which is akin to data fabrication in regular science. Bogdan, Dyer did not come to the conclusion that Moldovan and Romanian are truly separate languages. With regards to the parallel translation, he says ""the greatest difference between these two texts are in the vocabularies and in the styles they employ. There is a more 'flowering' prose in the Moldovan text... to reiterate, the difference here is one of style, not one of substance"". Actually, ""le style est l'homme même"", as Buffon once said. Dyer starts from the premise that the style in each country is homogenous: it is not, there are much more differences between different individuals in the same country. His ways of studying language is just as useless as the way the Nazis studied genetics by assuming the homogenity of the Aryan race. Yes, that's his point. That nearly all of the differences between the two passages are not differences between two languages, but just because two different translators. Earlier, you said ""...a sane linguist would take two random people, put them to translate a text from Yiddish..."". Actually, he got these comparisons from published translations in ""Romanian"" and ""Moldovan"". He didn't just walk up to random people on the street. The only actual possible grammatical difference he finds in the texts is Moldovan ""pe tot ce vretsi"", and Romanian ""pe cît vretsi"". There were very few web results for ""pe tot ce vreti"" (about 5), and one of them was from the Zdob shi Zdub website (a Moldovan band). There were no results in Moldova for ""pe cit vreti""/""pe cat vreti"". So that may or may not be valid. I personally would say ""pe tot ce vretsi"". But I don't know if it's real. I suppose this is part of an expression, such as ""jur pe tot ce vrei"" or ""pun pariu pe tot ce vrei"". Anyway, both sound common enough in Romanian and sounds pretty subjective choosing one for Romanian and one for Moldovan. Now, neither of those expressions is ""made up"". He takes both from M. Bruchis' work, ""one step back, two steps forward"" which is also quite critical of the notion of an independent Moldovan language. But can this author prove they exist? Probably not, since no google hits are found. Michael Bruchis, you mean? I'm sure he can. He's an expert, too. He wrote an entire book on the subject. Just because no Google hits exist doesn't mean an expression isn't real do you find any Google results for cit vreti%22+site%3A.md or cat vreti%22+site%3A.md? Or even tot ce vreti%22+site%3A.md? No, you don't. But that doesn't mean that nobody says those things in Moldova. How many results do you find for ""instrumente gramaticale""? 37, and none of them are at .md websites. You can find the word ""cuvintelnic"" on Google, but does that mean it's really the Moldovan word for ""dictionar""? No, Moldovan ppl only use that word when we're joking. (dexonline.ro finds 0 results too). Just because a term occurs or doesn't occur on Google, doesn't mean it is or isn't real. ""sovetul"" is not a misspelling. Rather, it's a Soviet-era spelling ""soviet"" was spelt as ""sovet"". Some Moldovans still spell it that way although it's usually considered incorrect; however he is quoting the phrase from Bruchis, who published his work a bit earlier when the spelling was still accepted. I agree with your opinion. Such an ignorant person like ""expert Dyer"" can't be called expert. talk & contribs "
0.00209
0
0
You piece of chickenshit cunt I'm going to have my way with the zero hedge article punk, and if you get in my way I'm going to rape your user page motherfucker.
0.996589
1
1
" I agree that we create a new section on athletics. Please remove the athletic ""controversies"" and place them there."
0.000536
0
0
Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors, which you appear to have violated at England national football team. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you! (arf!)
0.000608
0
0
people like you are the reason wikipedia is useless. Well done!
0.769176
1
1
I stand by my belief that my edits were constructive. Vandals are just like criminals, they do not deserve to be treated kindly. I believe that you should tell them the truth and let them know how it really is, you should let them know that they are not human. I know you had no choice but to block me, and I respect that. Please continue trying to make Wikipedia a better place in any way you see fit. Thanks.
0.001798
0
0
Recommend disolving Miraculous births article There has been fraud here, which was calculated to give the appearance that Miraculous births had all the same information as Virgin birth (mythology) before the merge. Unless there is some Wikipedia rule that allows everyone to overlook this outrage, I suggest this article by its false history and its pretense of independence, all calculated to force an outcome favored by the perpetrators, forfeits its right to exist at the expense of Virgin birth (mythology).
0.000808
0
0
NO what it is instead is blatant censorship by a bunch of ignorant bigots.
0.884372
1
0
Are you seriously trying to claim racism against people of Middle Eastern background or origin does not exist? The FBI disagrees with you. The Scythian
0.00135
0
0
YOUR HILARIOUS WHY DONT U STOP CHANGING WHAT PPL SAY AND LEAVE THEM ALONE. IF IM CORRECT WERE ALLOWED TO SAY WHATEVER WE FEEL LIKE SO U HAVE NO RIGHT TO CHANGE WHAT OTHER PPL SAY. MAKE A SEPERATE COMMENT ABOUT BUT DONT BE AN A**HOLE AND CHAGE/DELETE IT
0.914868
1
1
1980, a year prior to their actual formation. No explanation is being given as to why this edit keeps appearing, no source, no edit comments, nothing. There is a source in the article that clearly states activity began in
0.000622
0
0
well, I didn't know about Uncyclopedia when I made Myke's page. and believe me, to the people I'm sending it to, it's funny, even if it would seem insulting. I;ll try posting it there, but if it's anything like wikipedia, I doubt it. Looks like you guys are going to lose business to Encyclopedia Dramatica. X
0.001044
0
0
RT @GMB_Ace: Lame bitches always Wanna try 2 Play a real Nigga like a Lame Bitch das how u get treated N cut loose&#9995;
0.993146
1
1
I am a typical Democrat. I stand for social and economic justice. You guys apparently do not. Rather, you stand for the sockputtery of basically, why do you hate Jesus and believe the Ten Commandents are errant? I acutually object to adultery, but you as Republicans are dedicated to sock-pupptery, and sleeping-around is your version of Good-By-Jesus. Shall I call you a homosexual slut? Clearly, you belive adultery is a good wiki thing.
0.964202
1
1
" Saying ""this page exists"" is misleading now? How stupid are people that they would be mislead by a page saying that a page exists? oaP "
0.841664
1
1
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
0.001548
0
0
Your user name is stupid stopgiving me warnings you batty
0.967971
1
1