text
stringlengths 7
5k
| degree_of_toxicity
float64 0
1
| contains_offensive_word
int64 0
1
| label
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|
"
Complex issue
This is quite a complex issue. There have been a few cases around the world where individual officials have solemnised marriages (e.g. France, Greece, Quintana Roo in Mexico). I don't think these jurisdictions should be included in the template, since there is no generalised recognition of same-sex marriage or possibility of generally entering into a legal same-sex marriage. However, what we have in Alagoas seems a bit different. I am prima facie in favour of including Alagoas based on the reasoning of User:Denisxavier. However, before we include Alagoas, we need a bit more information about how Brazilian marriage law works. In particular, I have two questions:
*When an opposite-sex couple wants to enter into a marriage in Brazil, how do they do it? Are legal marriages registered at a Civil Registry Office, which conducts a civil ceremony and provides the marriage certificate? What is the role of the judge in these marriages? Also, what is a ""Notary""? Are they a state official working in a Civil Registry Office, or a private person who can register marriages? The issue I am interested in here is: is the process for entering into a same-sex marriage identical to entering into an opposite-sex marriage in Alagoas? Or are there administrative / procedural differences?
*Are Civil Registry Offices/Notaries obliged to register same-sex marriages in Alagoas, or are they merely allowed to do so? If they are not obliged to do so, then I think it's more problematic to include Alagoas in the template, because it means that the law is not being applied consistently.
The fact that the highest federal court has not yet ruled on the matter is in my opinion irrelevant. When the Supreme Court of California legalised same-sex marriage in California, we still included it in the template, even if the Supreme Court of the US did not yet give its opinion. Wikipedia is flexible enough that it can accommodate to changing realities; if a superior court strikes down the lower court, then all we need to do is simply change the template again. This has been done a few times already. Cheers, '''''' ✉ " | 0.000616 | 0 | 0 |
http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/02/18/barracks.death/ There. Don't know how you mised this in the news. I don't know how to do any of this citation crap, either. I don't have enough time to spend all day chained to a computer learning haxx0ring or whatever it is you nerds do all day in your parent's basement. And it's notable because it happened on the base and is becoming quite a big scandal. This should be obvious on the surface, idiot. | 0.904887 | 1 | 1 |
(UTC)
Its an academic term (used in Universities). Few American actual TCKs are familiar with the term. Nor is the average American. However it does accurately describe those of us who grew up this way.
10:08, 30 November 2009 | 0.001099 | 0 | 0 |
@msteffens32 @StonerBoii2cold back in high school w/ one. fuck these hoes now nigga lol thats what they for | 0.996869 | 1 | 1 |
"
Clarification: the article as I, an emancipated minor, rewrote it said ""...excluding..."". The moron at 209.247.21.237 vandalized it. I've changed it back. You are correct, all ATF laws still apply. Emancipation only relates to matters of consent and matters of financesit allows you to live essentially an adult life...work, sign contracts, seek healthcare, etc." | 0.042743 | 0 | 0 |
"
Ban one side of an argument by a bullshit nazi admin and you get no discussion because the islamist editors feel they ""won""." | 0.992012 | 1 | 1 |
bitch ass che guevara loving beaner! | 0.997836 | 1 | 1 |
Fuck you, I was curious as to who the actors played, and to read Cumberbatch is Khan is a total dick move. Fuck you. Fuck you. Fuck you! | 0.997909 | 1 | 1 |
Stop vandalising and crystal balling on the madrid page 194.66.216.40 | 0.021552 | 0 | 0 |
What The Hell!
Did You Even Read My Post To ICECOLDBEER Asshole!! | 0.980349 | 1 | 1 |
Intentional removal
Please do not revert my edits again without providing an explanation why, such as you did on Reach Out (Hilary Duff song). | 0.00062 | 0 | 0 |
"== Literal text ==
I have changed ""According to the literal text of the constitution, the Governor-General is the representative of the Queen of Australia."" to refer to Queen Victoria instead. I did this to make a point and that point is that the literal text of the Constitution cannot be taken as an unfailingly reliable guide to either practice or law.
Read the Constitution and you will find no mention of the Prime Minister, who is undeniably the head of government, even if one might imagine that this position is occupied by the Governor-General from a cursory reading of the Constitution. The Constitution declares that there shall be an Inter-State Commission, but the truth is that this body does not exist.
Please, if you refer to the literal text of the Constitution, either stick to the literal text and refrain from inserting material that does not belong - you will search in vain for the title ""Queen of Australia"", for example - or qualify it by referring to documents and events such as the Royal Style and Titles Act 1953 where the title ""Queen of Australia"" was introduced. 23:44, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Skyring - It is interesting how your own comments can be used to demonstrate how you add your own point of view - ""I did this to make a point!"". A point about ""literal"" text is make by using the adjective ""literal"". Your point belongs elsewhere.
Anyway, the literal text does not mention ""Queen Victoria"" it mentions the ""Queen"". It further states that the ""Name of the King or Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for the time being is to be substituted from time to time"". This is what I has done. Maybe, there is a more accurate way of making this subtitution, but ""Queen Victoria""! That's wrong, wrong, wrong!
Is it? Have you checked the original? I think that you will find that instead of checking, you jumped in with some more untruths. Please think instead of responding when I press your buttons. 21:50, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I notice you haven't responded to this. Have you checked the original? This is in Parliament House, and is on public didplay. 00:04, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Yes I have checked: www.foundingdocs.gov.au
""Not found The page you requested is not available at this address."" I suggest you check the original. I have. 00:29, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Rather than just jump in and make changes after 15 seconds thought, go back have a think for serveral days before you start adding stuff like this!. It just wastes time. Also, when you say ""Please!"", ""Read the constitution"", you are showing contempt for others.
01:02, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
When someone makes an obvious mistake like saying the literal text of the Constitution refers to the Queen of Australia, then I am quite justified in asking that person to read it. 21:50, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
If you refer to the ""literal text"" of the Constitution you will have to concede that it contains no reference to a ""Queen of Australia,"" and that is because the thought of Australia as a state separate from the British Empire would have been quite foreign to the men who wrote the Constitution. 01:56, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I explained the substitution logic above and applied it. Then skyring put in ""Queen Victoria"" !!! So I reduced it to just just ""Queen"" (ie no substiution.) I have no problem either way. 11:56, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Let's stick with the Queen, shall we? That's probably the best bet. 21:50, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I thought the point about literal text had been made, but I see that it has not been appreciated. The Constitution does not state that the Governor-General is the representative of the Queen. If you want to quote the literal text of the Constition, then by all means do so, but don't go making stuff up that you think might or should or could be in there, when it clearly isn't. 23:49, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nowhere in the literal text of the Constitution will you find the statement ""the Governor-General is the representative of the Queen"". Nowhere. s2 states ""A Governor-General appointed by the Queen shall be Her Majesty's representative"". That is a clear statement of intention. I noted s101 previously, which states: ""There shall be an Inter-State Commission"". There is not an Inter-State Commission, so clearly it is incorrect to say that the literal text of s2 means that the Governor-General is now the Queen's representative, given the example | 0.000761 | 0 | 0 |
Okay but there IS an OR 205 (there's a wiki page for that) and it doesn't redirect to that one, it redirects to the Interstate. | 0.000598 | 0 | 0 |
Perhaps if you don't believe that England accounts for 98% of the UK's GDP you should try working it out for yourself... | 0.000739 | 0 | 0 |
@user @user Target environment keeps getting richer. | 0.000625 | 0 | 0 |
False accused deletions
Hey, Some idiot called reverted edits by a false claim saying it's constructive and vandalism. | 0.832238 | 1 | 1 |
"
Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):
OK
Request handled by: " | 0.00053 | 0 | 0 |
I actually get on with Erin and think she's really nice bit you're so two faced and bitch about her all the time... #nasty | 0.916762 | 1 | 1 |
you are still a stupid cunt of a whore!
you are still a stupid cunt of a whore! | 0.996576 | 1 | 1 |
AND I EVEN PUT A LINK TO A HIGHLIGHTS VIDEO ON YOUTUBE | 0.000607 | 0 | 0 |
"|decline=You are not directly blocked, please follow the advice that Newyorkbrad has given below. — ( ? (('Stop') ('Go')) " | 0.000645 | 0 | 0 |
go suk a set of malaysian hairy monkey balls | 0.885072 | 1 | 1 |
I love this LIBERALS DELIBERATELY leave info out about their heroes, but rush to judgement about conservatives.This DarkGray dufas is trying to BLOCKADE the truth.
And the person who was FOOLISH enough to actually find a reliable source doesn't realize wiki has NO intention of posting anything harmful to their icons...reliable sources or not.
The liberals that control wikipedia are like the Old Soviet Style MOBSTERS.162.216.14.26 | 0.042208 | 0 | 0 |
Because at your local insurance agency, the customer is ALWAYS our bitch. #itakeshitfromnoone 👏 | 0.967094 | 1 | 1 |
hey motherfucker hurry up! | 0.9979 | 1 | 1 |
, like Bono has KBE at the end of his | 0.001158 | 0 | 0 |
"
I replied at WT:NRHP#formerly listed subtables. As for the NRHP templates at Commons. I first wanted to do some automated runs before the humans start investing time. As you might have noticed, Commons:Category:National Register of Historic Places with known IDs increased a lot in size. I would add the template to both the categories and the images. Currently the template isn't clickable yet like the Rijksmonument template at this example, but that might change in the future.
A lot of images have known IDs right now. I plan to extend the monuments api to make it possible to easily fetch these images for reuse. So you enter ""82001192"" and you get a lot of images of the Empire State Building. " | 0.000549 | 0 | 0 |
@vernon1488 town . At a movie with friends. I stabbed a nig 3 times and got sent to prison. Justice? | 0.471358 | 1 | 0 |
I hope i trip and fall into some pussy, tunechi | 0.992544 | 1 | 1 |
RT @DatNigPriest: @1BookieG not all of us my nig! I'm light skin with a dark skin mentality lol. We all black | 0.717857 | 1 | 1 |
Sure, that makes sense.
You can't support your reasoning, so you fall back on a 'big stick' and ban me from any way of refuting your bullshit.
Go for it then, big-boy.
Fucks' sake, power corrupts, eh? You're probably a nice person, but...Jesus... you can be a cunt when you try. Oh well, have fun with your imaginary superpowers, I'll be back to the wiki tomorrow on another IP. Byeeee. 88.104.27.75 | 0.954678 | 1 | 1 |
RT @marthayabish_: that's the type of bitch that I hate | 0.989181 | 1 | 1 |
User_talk:BozMo#disclaimer_regarding_the_workforall_spammer - domain name disambiguation
User_talk:Requestion#h.2Attp:.2F.2FWorkforall.net_Contibutions_:_Statement - legal warnings? | 0.000849 | 0 | 0 |
RT @Adolfhibsta: Ratchet ass bitch RT “@TMZ: Nicki Minaj SMASHES UP her boyfriend's Benz http://t.co/BXqD30Z6Nb http://t.co/gBgjiuIreF” | 0.995409 | 1 | 1 |
ion care if I'm in the wrong bitch don't blow ur horn📢 at me | 0.983435 | 1 | 1 |
RT @Get_It_MarMar: If I hit you wit that shottie bitch, I bet ya body flip ! 🔫💥💥💥 | 0.985835 | 1 | 1 |
this is one of the very important theological colleges in Bangalore, India. Please allow the contents to remain unchanged. If necessary, make positive correction without altering the content | 0.000523 | 0 | 0 |
I love to whine like a baby and get people banned, do not test me! | 0.057425 | 0 | 0 |
"
Lift the protection
In survey to lift:
Suppport ≈talk≈
In opposition to lift:" | 0.000674 | 0 | 0 |
" (UTC)
I do think it's worth adding a criticism section. I actually won't let my kids watch it because the english (and spanish) is terrible, the manners are terrible, I think it's subtly racist (why does dora cross a river in every episode?), I think the fox is a subtle knock on jews and I think that boots is a subtle knock on african americans. Handy Manny is a good example of a nonracist show which has none of these problems, but I think they're going so out their way to make dora ""special"" it comes off as trite. Blogs: http://jeremybiggers.blogspot.com/2006/01/racism-in-children-shows.html Bitch mag: http://bitchmagazine.org/article/factory-girl today.com: http://writingisfun.today.com/2009/12/07/dora-the-explorer-is-a-wetback/ 20:13, 23 March 2010" | 0.074558 | 0 | 0 |
Basically, the answer is that unless there is something really really wrong in your article, you should avoid editing it in any way. Take a look at WP:AUTOBIO, particularly WP:AUTO#IFEXIST. | 0.00066 | 0 | 0 |
Sing a song of Sanger
God I hate this guy SO much. | 0.717515 | 1 | 0 |
Look, I'm putting crap on your talk page. How does it feel? | 0.947077 | 1 | 1 |
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit
BULLSHIT Bullshit | 0.990034 | 1 | 1 |
@t__amil i tell it how it is if yu ain uh bitch or uh hoe i call yu by yo name | 0.921602 | 1 | 1 |
You have this certain stupidity surrounding you which makes me conclude you are born in the US. | 0.932142 | 1 | 1 |
@jazminesmazmine dykes aren't even human tbh, like what empowered them to dress like a man but like bitches?? Some alien shit | 0.983008 | 1 | 1 |
And i didn't wanna come off as a bitch, so I took another hit, now I think I'm feeling to high | 0.93294 | 1 | 1 |
{{unblock}}
1. There is no practical way in terms of adding my explanations for historical experiments. There are no converters from MS to LatEx
2. Even if there was an easy conversion , who would read a wiki post that extends on 10 pages and reads like a scientific paper
3. I would be more than happy to remove my name from the papers linked in if this would be an acceptable compromise. | 0.000567 | 0 | 0 |
"Since it has now been established that this discussion refers to a subsequently titled and reinterpreted revision of the original 2001 (untitled) two-sentence petition calling for ""skeptical examination of evidence for scientific theories"" and since there is no reliable source to DI's controversial linking of the 103 signers of the original untitled petition to its subsequently titled, reinterpreted, and repurposed version, I propose archiving or deleting this section as it has now been revealed that there is no reliably sourced connection of the retitled and reinterpreted document to the subject of this biography article.
" | 0.000573 | 0 | 0 |
"Durrr..??? - OMS!! Do you really believe you needed to explain that to me?? (What ever gave you that idea??).Put that directly in the article if you like - AS I SAID. I thought we both had concurred that it was redundant Due to the (prepared via the Eschweiler-Clarke synthesis) linked reaction. I fail to see any point to this comment you have made to me. Or Again What were/are you ""trying"" to say. So as it appears all my previous words were lost on you, Shall we start again positively and constructively??.
" | 0.001142 | 0 | 0 |
}}
{{Image requested|people of the United States|people | 0.000635 | 0 | 0 |
This 8am biology lab ain't no hoe 😩😭 | 0.009444 | 0 | 1 |
No, asshole. You copied and pasted text from a newspaper's website into a Wikipedia article. I reverted the addition of scare quotes to an article. I undid your WP:COPYVIO at an article I've been editing since 2011. You followed me to an article you've never edited before. If you're too fucking stupid to understand the difference, maybe you're too stupid to be editing Wikipedia. — Talk/Stalk | 0.990936 | 1 | 1 |
typical female silliness
to create articles about their women. nobody cares. | 0.838581 | 1 | 1 |
LOSER QUESTION
Any reason why you can't mind your own fucking business? Ever kissed a girl? I don't think so, at least not an attractive one
Get the FUCK out of articles you don't understand, loser | 0.996648 | 1 | 1 |
Ok, citation are nice, but can you define what is liberal democracy then? | 0.000601 | 0 | 0 |
Your Tenetuous Editing
Arbustoo, why do you fear Christians? I respect your right to be ignorant of Gods word, but running a cabal to oppress Christians is downright discriminatory and hateful. Please, I would like to open a dialogue and help you come to terms with the 95% of Americans who believe in Christs love. | 0.050276 | 0 | 0 |
Lostprophets is a FUCKING NU METAL BAND BITCH
Lostprophets is a FUCKING NU METAL BAND BITCH. ANSWEAR ME BITCH. | 0.997941 | 1 | 1 |
Wentworth A Matthew.
Let me start by saying thanks for verification of edits, that is important to maintain editorial and factual accuracy.
My grandfather was the late Chief Rabbi W.A. Matthew. Secondly I am an attorney with a practice in commercial litigation. Third I was ordained a rabbi by my grandfather nearly 40 years ago (which you may verify on Wikipedia under Commandments Keepers). That being said I know the actual and legal name of the congregation and that is why I corrected it. However you need only check the name against records of the New York Secretary of State. I was not engaging in a debate over the name of the congregation founded by my grandfather, however I will address factual inaccuracies when I see them.
The temple owned by the congregation was fraudulently transferred and that is currently being litigated with trial set for April 14,2014. See NY Post 2007; Wall Street Journal 2010. Jewish Week 2007. One of the issues was the fraudulent use of the name of the congregation to transfer title, the name in the Wikipedia article.
David M. Doré' | 0.000596 | 0 | 0 |
Nice Language
Outstanding example you are for Wikipedia Phil. To use the F word in such a public way.
At least we know what kind of person you really are now. | 0.000789 | 0 | 0 |
You must really hate freedom, you evil-doing, nazi asshole
IP Banning, is that something Osama Bin Laden told you would be effective? You are such a snivelling little asshole | 0.997523 | 1 | 1 |
. We can either be civil and deal with this as adults, or I can simply get it dealt with officially. Your call | 0.000729 | 0 | 0 |
You have no friends BC nobody wants to be guilty by association #hoe | 0.134727 | 1 | 1 |
@_BeautifulKeezy bitch Wea you going. | 0.99141 | 1 | 1 |
and I wanted it to stop | 0.00155 | 0 | 0 |
Thanks
Hey Sherurcij thank you for contributing the article and I made some edits for you. | 0.000528 | 0 | 0 |
Champions League
Hey, thanks for helping to create the Fixtures of the Groups. -) | 0.000557 | 0 | 0 |
No problem. -) Iamunknown | 0.001022 | 0 | 0 |
"I am curious, does anyone know if dodge made a ""Super Bee"" duall 3/4 ton truck, circa 1975. Thanks, Duane" | 0.000602 | 0 | 0 |
"
A cheeseburger for you!
Fatty " | 0.913156 | 1 | 1 |
ever gonna talk, or are you afraid that you're wrong. | 0.001863 | 0 | 0 |
Sometimes it can feel like your old mommy is always ready to be intimate with you.Even at 68This lustful Mom's pussy doesn't stop soaking | 0.879243 | 1 | 1 |
@NY_NastyBaby you a lil bitch man,keep my name out to mouth. That's all ima say. #shhh | 0.994675 | 1 | 1 |
Looks at the edit history of TAR17* Yeesh...some people don't get the message. But this is exactly the problem. People are so dedicated to >> and << that they're afraid of anything else, like the Sideways U's. This is why I'm thinking that the >><< should stay because if you change them all to U's, you're going to have to undo a lot of edits...174.1.48.24 | 0.001322 | 0 | 0 |
You dosh bag, dont mess with me. My watch is worth more then your car, so if you know whats good for you, shut up. By the way are you a chick fucker? | 0.997053 | 1 | 1 |
"
I disagree that it was the wrong judgement and I do not recognize your claim to be in any position to make such an absolute imperial finding. I also disagree with your philosophy of force expressed on your user page and translated into action here in this encounter among equals, ""Democracy must be imposed with an iron fist."" ""A democracy, the realistic observer is forced to conclude, is likely to be idealistic in its feelings about itself, but imperialistic about its practice.""
99.141.246.60 " | 0.000639 | 0 | 0 |
"
Members/Former Members
I'm confused as to how you can list Syd Barrett and Bob Klose as ""former members"" and not Roger Waters or Richard Wright (who is dead, in case anyone forgot hard to be a member of a band when you are dead). Isn't there a better way to do this, such as listing everyone as members with dates active like at the bottom of the article? Or, could we just re-name the ""members"" section to something like ""classic line-up"", and the ""former members"" to ""other members""? And, to anyone who wants to claim that Roger Waters is a current member because he played a one-off show with David, Richard and Nick, I would be curious to hear what Gilmour (the current band leader, if there is a current Pink Floyd to speak of) thinks about that. Given his disinterest in playing another show with Waters, I doubt he would consider that a true statement. " | 0.001167 | 0 | 0 |
"
Sockpupperts
How much we must to wait? Please see: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rtuftrbsee. This person has many sockpuppets only to controversial changes and edit-wars, nothing more. Still create new sockpuppets (for example talk(en-2) " | 0.006672 | 0 | 0 |
@ListsBlackTwit @iH8TvvitterHoes @Rosaalbae nigga caping for the bitch like we haven't all seen her nudes already.. What does he want tf | 0.977386 | 1 | 1 |
I'm also a huge cunt! talk | 0.953486 | 1 | 1 |
" The Wikipedia criteria is flexible citing new wikis as links to ""normally be avoided"" but it is not an absolute block. A more comprehensive look at these Debatepedia.org articles is warranted I think." | 0.000551 | 0 | 0 |
Looking like a nappy headed hoe but reppin that Patrick Ewing crew neck tho http://t.co/6Z7SnF26Xh | 0.435728 | 1 | 1 |
Milhist
Oops, brain fart, thought it was the 15th >.< You'd think I'd notice this stuff when everything is time stamped. | 0.091719 | 0 | 0 |
I love Asian bitches | 0.953709 | 1 | 1 |
' Fucking on the first night don't make you a hoe ✋ . | 0.997178 | 1 | 1 |
So I guess I'm on snapchat now? So snapchat me bitches. Danvii . No idea... | 0.976576 | 1 | 1 |
"
U.S. in title, US in article
Any reason this shouldn't be moved to List of US Highways in Michigan to be consistent with all the usages of ""US Highway"" within the article? " | 0.000588 | 0 | 0 |
@Mrste617 wake and bake before school hoe !!! | 0.31931 | 1 | 1 |
The fact is you people consider him to be some sort of joint first minister. He is not, and the First Minister will NEVER be one of your kind. Clearly it has been established that sentence case should be used in the infobox. | 0.000895 | 0 | 0 |
@RealYdotGdot We in dat bitch, my dude!!! | 0.995232 | 1 | 1 |
3 years today I was a fucking retard and fell in love. Why was I so stupid? Wish I was coldhearted. #neverlovingsomeoneagain #dontneedanyone | 0.996912 | 1 | 1 |
accept = We are sincerely sorry for your experience. | 0.000512 | 0 | 0 |
"
Are you forgetting, Risker, that it was I that embraced Giano's plan to get Vk unblocked and presented it to the community? It was he and I that did most of the work drafting the conditions. It was my continuing interest that helped get him back to a position where he can edit. Vk (and Giano) were more than happy to have my input when he thought it would get him unblocked, but now the conditions are not to Vk's liking - despite what he agreed at the time - suddenly the accusations against me start again. What is really sad is that you seem to buy into it.
I strongly resent your implication that I want him banned. I supported a ban in the past, true, along with many other editors. But the accusation makes absolutely no sense, considering how was already banned (twice) and both times I worked to get it lifted, this despite some atrocious personal abuse from Vk in the past. So I'll tell you what, I may not forget how editors responded to me, but I don't hold it against them to the detriment of the project. et " | 0.000741 | 0 | 0 |
Documentation AN Revision as of 21:05, 14 February 2010 Future Perfect at Sunrise m (rv; user has been blocked for harassment and trolling) | 0.000681 | 0 | 0 |
Have you ever slapped a bitch for giving you a big hickey #wiggy #wiggy #wiggy | 0.992243 | 1 | 1 |
"
The following people have conspired to edit war for the sake of inserting their POV thus violating NPOV and suppressing information. See their conspiracy to edit war and, this is their words not mine ""call to arms"" here i.e. where they call for an edit war.
" | 0.000996 | 0 | 0 |
February 2007 (UTC)
Ah, thanks! Response on my talk page. — [T@lk/Improve me] 04:38, 19 | 0.000631 | 0 | 0 |
This why I be on the bitches so much they LISTEN to Me 🚨🚨🚨 | 0.961532 | 1 | 1 |
The Macedonian ORIGIN name is Monastir(Greek name) ! Bitola is Serbian (Slav) Name !!! ZEUS .15.03.2003 | 0.001367 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.