Datasets:
ComplexDataLab
/
cdl-data-chai-enwiki-20250520

Dataset card Data Studio Files Community
title
stringlengths
1
251
section
stringlengths
0
6.12k
text
stringlengths
0
716k
Category:Greek expatriate sportspeople in Singapore
Fooian expatriate sportspeople in Bar cat
Category:Greek expatriate sportspeople in Singapore
Table of Content
Fooian expatriate sportspeople in Bar cat
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubal Thakur
[[:Rubal Thakur]]
:Rubal Thakur – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination) () Fails all notability criteria. Mekomo (talk) 15:14, 19 May 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:40, 19 May 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:40, 19 May 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Himachal Pradesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:40, 19 May 2025 (UTC) Delete: Do not meet any notability criteria and the article is written to promote the subject rather than for encyclopedic purposes.Thilsebatti (talk) 02:58, 20 May 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:BLP - at least three important sections are completely unreferenced. Not against userfication. Bearian (talk) 03:03, 21 May 2025 (UTC) Delete fails WP:GNG. If somehow saved, needs significantly better sourcing. SportingFlyer T·C 06:16, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubal Thakur
Table of Content
[[:Rubal Thakur]]
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 50 to 250 square kilometers
[[:List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 50 to 250 square kilometers]]
:List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 50 to 250 square kilometers – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination) () No indication that this meets WP:NLIST, not clear that any other reliable source has paid attention to a grouping of these different levels of politicial entities, seems rather random. Also seems in many parts incorrect, many of these are apparently neither continents, countries, nor first level subdivisions (e.g. Røsvatnet or Gil Island (Canada) or Replot). Fram (talk) 15:14, 19 May 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Lists. Fram (talk) 15:14, 19 May 2025 (UTC) Speedy keep. WP:AFDISNTCLEANUP. This is a transcluded subset of a larger lists. Deleting this will just leave a hole of this size in the middle of the lists into which it is transcluded. Of course, listing of geographic features by size is very well-established, and this specific division is just a convenient subset of the entire list. With respect to the concern that there are items on the list that should not be there, feel free to remove those. There are at least 200,000 islands in the world, and it seems obvious that we should not be listing all of those here if they are not their own administrative entities. There are more than enough countries and first level subdivisions to fill up the list. BD2412 T 15:49, 19 May 2025 (UTC) "This is a transcluded subset of a larger lists." No, this is an article. Whether another list transcludes this or not is an issue for that list, not for AfD. This article here and now is directly readable by readers, it is categorized, it should meet our criteria for an article. "listing of geographic features by size is very well-established" across some randomly decided characteristics? I don't think so. A list of countries by size is not a problem and wouldn't be at AfD, what is at AfD (and can't be helped by cleanup) is this combination of (officially) continents, countries, and "first level subdivisions", and (in practice) everything else that someone wants to add (and that apparently not only pollutes not just this page then, but also all these other pages this is transcluded onto). Do you have any evidence of other reliable sources treating these three levels together in one list by size like this one, or is this a Wikipedia invention? Fram (talk) 15:59, 19 May 2025 (UTC) My understanding is that article splits made on the basis of size do not incur extra responsibility on the resultant pages that the splitting points themselves be based on WP:N. That is to say, if we have a List of bumberchute pratfalls, and it is split into List of bumberchute pratfalls (1700–1900) and List of bumberchute pratfalls (1900–present), this does not ipso facto create a new requirement that we find a bunch of historians who specifically divide bumberchute pratfalls into a pre-1900 and post-1900 era. jp×g🗯️ 19:06, 20 May 2025 (UTC) Your reply has nothing to do with my comment it seems, which was not about where to split (or even to split at all): "Do you have any evidence of other reliable sources treating these three levels together in one list by size like this one, or is this a Wikipedia invention?" The three levels are "continents, countries, and first level subdivisions" from all over the world, and no matter how large or small. Fram (talk) 13:58, 21 May 2025 (UTC) That seems to be the case for a substantial amount of this list, though, there are a lot of Canadian islands here, and the two lists below have nearly 300 Scottish islands. These lists could be more meaningful if they don't attempt to – yet obviously fail badly – be so comprehensive. Reywas92Talk 16:12, 19 May 2025 (UTC) If there is not an objection to listing countries and their states/provinces, then removing the smaller islands is a cleanup task. The larger islands tend to be their own administrative divisions. BD2412 T 16:19, 19 May 2025 (UTC) Comment I don't believe this meets the criteria for a speedy keep. WP:AFDISNTCLEANUP is not a speedy keep criterion. Stockhausenfan (talk) 21:59, 19 May 2025 (UTC) You can read it as a "strong keep", then, but if a subset of a an uncontested series of lists is deleted because that subset is deemed not individually notable, then it would pretty much automatically be merged up to the larger list, which has not been nominated for deletion here. That would just be clean up and merge. BD2412 T 22:39, 19 May 2025 (UTC) Added these two because their Prod was removed, and for the same reasons. Fram (talk) 16:01, 19 May 2025 (UTC) Delete (all). This is such a random WP:CROSSCAT of things, that it's difficult to tell what should even be included or excluded. I see some silly micronation on the small end, as well as a department of France, which appears to be second-level, not first, along with random islands and full nations. Why are such things combined together? It's even bad enough if you try to restrict to only first-level subdivisions, as these are rather different entities from nation to nation. This is exactly the sort of dreck that NLIST, CROSSCAT, etc., should be used to weed out. And make no mistake, there's nothing all that special about sorting by area. We could also do it by population, by number of roads, or total jellybean exports. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 19:29, 19 May 2025 (UTC) We don't have such lists for population or jellybean exports because those are far less stable. If they were unchanging, it would make sense to have lists. BD2412 T 22:40, 19 May 2025 (UTC) Okay, so replace population and jellybean exports by highest and lowest elevation, number of lakes, or whatever and the point remains. Those would be stable, yet no reasonable person would argue we should have those. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 05:45, 20 May 2025 (UTC) In fact, IP, we do have: Of course, those lists overlap in a way area lists don't because the highest point in a county can also happen to be the highest point in a country, but there is no reason we couldn't have a list of highest points by first-level administrative subdivision worldwide. BD2412 T 14:16, 20 May 2025 (UTC) You honestly don't see the difference between those tightly focused lists of "one geographic characteristic for one clearly delineated, closely related group, e.g. "Swiss cantons"" vs. "one geographic characteristic for three clearly different groups lumped together in one list"? Fram (talk) 14:27, 20 May 2025 (UTC) Do you think it would be impermissible to have a single list of highest points by administrative division for all administrative divisions on Earth? BD2412 T 19:17, 20 May 2025 (UTC) Seriously? Do you have any idea at all how many "administrative divisions" there are on Earth? How many of these don't even have an article, or have no reliable sources beyond a census result? Never mind "impermissible", let's go with plain "impossible", "impractical" and "totally useless". Why would you want to compare the highest point of municipalities in Denmark to the highest point of parishes in Antigua? Perhaps stick to the discussion on hand and not drag in even worse ideas. Fram (talk) 07:19, 21 May 2025 (UTC) There is no law that ties us to an "all-or-nothing" approach. We could absolutely have a list limited to the highest points in all of the top-level administrative divisions (e.g., states and provinces, or the equivalents in other countries). I'm not making that list, but that is the intent with the lists at issue here, with basically a handful of the largest geographic features included for comparison as well. BD2412 T 13:42, 21 May 2025 (UTC) What are you going on about? You posted a question about a list "for all administrative divisions", your words. I replied to your post. Instead of leaving it at that or engaging with my answer in the context of your question, you now act as if I am unreasonable to start about "all-or-nothing", when you were the one to bring this up for some unexplicable reason. You seem to have a very hard time engaging with what is actually being said, instead going off on tangents, strawmen, or other irrelevant stuff. Why? Fram (talk) 14:02, 21 May 2025 (UTC) Please strike your personal comments about me. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, not a Twitter-style cage match. I was clarifying my position, which was in reference to the types of lists of heights of administrative divisions that we already have, and as I provided above. I intentionally excluded things like List of tallest mountains in the Solar System, for exactly this reason. BD2412 T 14:11, 21 May 2025 (UTC) Nothing to strike there, and you only make things worse: "I intentionally excluded things like List of tallest mountains in the Solar System, for exactly this reason." ??? The only time that list was mentioned, was when you included it in the above long list of things we do have. If you want to use the "we are a collaborative project" trump card, then perhaps don't continue to post stuff which is barely distinguishable from troll-posting and gaslighting. It really is impossible at the moment to have an adult, reasonable conversation with you when you keep pretending to have said "A" when you actually said "Z" or "not-A". Fram (talk) 14:19, 21 May 2025 (UTC) Do you intend to respond vitriolically to everything I say? I would ask you to please reflect on what is beneficial to the discussion, and govern yourself accordingly. There can be no communication absent a modicum of respect. BD2412 T 14:37, 21 May 2025 (UTC) I feel absolutely no respect from you in this discussion, I have explained why your posts are extremely problematic. There is no way to meaningfully engage with your above posts which make claims which completely contradict or ignore your own earlier posts but pretend that they are logical followups. Fram (talk) 14:44, 21 May 2025 (UTC) With regard to the navigational purpose of list, limiting entries to those which have their own articles is a common approach which could solve the objection. Daranios (talk) 15:11, 21 May 2025 (UTC) I would, actually. These are fine. jp×g🗯️ 18:59, 20 May 2025 (UTC) Comment, in my opinion this is a really bad example of cross-categorisation, although the article(s) also transclude into :List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area (all) and :List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 0.1 to 1,000 square kilometers and the AfD templates appear to mess up the tables. There should be some discussion as to how to deal with these articles too. Ajf773 (talk) 09:28, 20 May 2025 (UTC) I started this by noticing (and prodding) List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area under 1 square kilometer in the new pages overview. That page doesn't seem to be linked to from any other article at the moment, and had no attribution if it was copied from somewhere else either. No idea why this one doesn't get transcluded and some others do, also no idea whe the very small entities are listed here, and in the <50km² list, and in the overall list, and perhaps elsewhere as well: it's a complete mess I guess, and transcluding articles into other articles is in general a bad idea. Anyway, these other articles have the same issues as the three up for deletion now, and should probably all be nominated for the same reasons. Does anyone have an overview of which articles we are talking about altogether? Fram (talk) 09:42, 20 May 2025 (UTC) Oh my, what a long list of pages with the same issues, how has this been allowed for so many years? Lists of political and geographic subdivisions by total area... Fram (talk) 09:44, 20 May 2025 (UTC) List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area (all) List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 0.1 to 1,000 square kilometers List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 1,000 to 3,000 square kilometers List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 1,000 to 5,000 square kilometers List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 10,000 to 20,000 square kilometers List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 100,000 to 1,000,000 square kilometers List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 100,000 to 200,000 square kilometers List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 20,000 to 30,000 square kilometers List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 20,000 to 50,000 square kilometers List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 200,000 to 500,000 square kilometers List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 250 to 1,000 square kilometers List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 3,000 to 5,000 square kilometers List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 30,000 to 50,000 square kilometers List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 5,000 to 20,000 square kilometers List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 5,000 to 7,000 square kilometers List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 50,000 to 100,000 square kilometers List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 50,000 to 200,000 square kilometers List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 500,000 to 1,000,000 square kilometers List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 50 to 250 square kilometers List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 7,000 to 10,000 square kilometers List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area in excess of 1,000,000 square kilometers List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area in excess of 200,000 square kilometers List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area under 1 square kilometer List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area under 50 square kilometers There are also some redirects to these. REAL_MOUSE_IRL talk 13:05, 20 May 2025 (UTC) Probably best as a second AfD once this one is finished, too many people have commented already and too much time has passed. Exact same reasons apply though. Fram (talk) 13:40, 20 May 2025 (UTC) That makes sense. You can use Special:PrefixIndex to get an up to date list of these when making the next filing, since they seem to be in flux at the moment. REAL_MOUSE_IRL talk 13:50, 20 May 2025 (UTC) Has anyone considered what this will look like if different nominations have different outcomes? If we end up with some of the lists kept, but with giant holes where entire countries are missing because they weren't in a size range that was kept? BD2412 T 14:35, 20 May 2025 (UTC) If some close as delete and others as no-consensus, I don't think it should be too controversial to re-nominate the remaining ones. If the implication here is that you would still oppose deletion even with half of these gone, that doesn't make sense to me. REAL_MOUSE_IRL talk 14:53, 20 May 2025 (UTC) You seem to be operating under that assumption that a consensus for deletion will ultimately develop if the articles are renominated enough times. Historically, you are liable to be disappointed there. BD2412 T 15:16, 20 May 2025 (UTC) Re: "how has this been allowed for so many years?" You might as well say that we have articles on every single U.S. president and ask how that has been allowed. This is allowed because dozens of Wikipedians have worked on putting these together over that time (some more than others). BD2412 T 14:19, 20 May 2025 (UTC) "This is allowed because dozens of Wikipedians have worked on putting these together over that time" Well, that's that settled then, thanks for pointing to that policy, and that very apt comparison you make with "articles on every single US president". Can't argue with that kind of logic! Fram (talk) 14:23, 20 May 2025 (UTC) Procedural keep This specific list, as has been said, is just a spin-out of a larger list of lists. It makes no sense to me to discuss this alone without considering this overall. If this is supposed to be a discussion on this whole type of lists, my opinion is keep: The lists have a lot of issues, and I think the scope should be reexamined and inclusion criterea clearly defined. E.g. should geographic and political be separated? Should geographic be included at all? Within political, should we stick to first level administrative country subdivisions to delinate it from its partner list, List of countries and dependencies by area? But these are questions best suited for the talk page(s), not a deletion discussion. Likewise there may be wrong inclusions and missing entries, but WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. WP:NLIST is the more serious issue. But first of all that guideline says: I do think that these lists fulfill an informational and navigational purpose, helpful in browsing this specific area of geography. Aside from that, while I did not see lists constructed exactly like this one in secondary sources, the overal topic does get coverage: Statistics for subdivisions of individual countries abound. But we also have these lists by statoids.com putting together inter-country comparisons. The CIA World Factbook gives a list of first-level administrative divisions of all countries, although no areas. GADM presumably has all the stats, but I can't say at this point in what form. And the academic publication Administrative Subdivisions of Countries has all the areas for all the political first-level sub-divisions in one place (and more info), it simply is sorted by country first, rather than by area. (If we wanted to, the lists could be restructured to be sortable by country, giving exactly the format in Administrative Subdivisions, but in addition providing the current sorting by area. - The beauty of Wikipedia being able to provide a sortable table, which a book cannot.) Lastly, if there should emerge consensus not to keep these articles despite the sources, still WP:Alternatives to deletion should be considered. List of countries and dependencies by area and List of administrative divisions by country are closely related topics, and splitting and merging content should then be considered, with redirects WP:PRESERVEing the current content in case the issues can be resolved more satisfactorily in the future. Daranios (talk) 15:26, 20 May 2025 (UTC) What contents here are not already available in other lists? We have lists of countries by area, List of first-level administrative divisions by area, ... Nothing is lost if these lists are deleted, nothing needs to be "split and merged", and thus no redirect (which wouldn't work anyway, as it would need to redirect to multiple pages at once) is needed. Fram (talk) 15:32, 20 May 2025 (UTC) Ah yeah, thanks, that was the other related list I could not find any more momentarily. That list in practice only considers the larger political subdivisions, while not making this clear. So for navigational and informational purposes it's less useful and comprehensive. Otherwise the List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area (all) and List of first-level administrative divisions by area could be merged together after a proper discussion on the inclusion critereon. Pinging , participants in that lists deletion discussion, as they possibly might be interested in this one here. Daranios (talk) 15:42, 20 May 2025 (UTC) The implicit assumption of the nomination is that no one wants to be able to compare the sizes of different kinds of entities. For example, that no one wants to be able to look at a list to see whether Siberia (an administrative division) is bigger than Europe (a continent), which in fact it is; or to see which country is closest in size to California, which as it turns out, is midway between Iraq and Paraguay. I'm all for refining the lists to avoid including a ton of islands, but alternatives to deletion should absolutely be considered. BD2412 T 16:49, 20 May 2025 (UTC) Did you know that Western Australia is slightly larger than the Mediterranean Sea, which is slightly larger than Central America, which is slightly larger than Algeria? Really, this could be a featured list. BD2412 T 16:55, 20 May 2025 (UTC) I find all of this very fascinating. What I can say from secondary sources is that Administrative Subdivisions naturally includes the data of countries together with those of their subdivisions for comparison. Also size-wise including them would be no problem. And this is another distinction between the lists in question here and List of first-level administrative divisions by area in its current form. Daranios (talk) 19:08, 20 May 2025 (UTC) "What I can say from secondary sources is that Administrative Subdivisions naturally includes the data of countries together with those of their subdivisions for comparison." Within the same country? Yes, we do that on enwiki as well, and such lists are not up for deletion. But lists which compare the size of the different cantons of Switzerland with the size of different countries? Unlikely... Fram (talk) 07:15, 21 May 2025 (UTC) The data is there to check out in one place, in one work, but not sorted by area. About the beauty of sortability on Wikipedia and the LISTN question in general, please see my comments above. Daranios (talk) 09:53, 21 May 2025 (UTC) Ah yeah, and the problem of where to target the redirect, if it came to that, would be a minor one: we could decide on the most closely related topic, which would presumably include links to the other related topics under at least under "See also" anyway. Daranios (talk) 19:12, 20 May 2025 (UTC)Keep, largely per BD2412. I do not object to the nominator's claim that the page needs some cleanup, but I do object to the idea that splitting an article creates new requirements for the endpoints of each resultant article. I made a split like this once, which created List of elections before 1701 and List of elections, 1701–1800: the split doesn't require me to find corroborating historiography that say something special happened in the development of electoral politics in 1701. jp×g🗯️ 19:12, 20 May 2025 (UTC) That's hardly the reason for this nomination though. The basic structure of the list, comparing sizes of countries, continents, and subdivisions of countries, is basically only done (outside Wikipedia) for some large entities, usually comparing a US state to a country or vice versa. Probably not a single reliable source so far has compared (or even compiled together) e.g. the cantons of Luxembourg with the municipalities of the Northern Marianas and the parishes of Dominica. A "list of elections" is one clearly defined group, which has only been split for reasons of size. Here we have completely disparate groups thrown together because, well, all I see is "I like it" and "it's useful" arguments, with the latter being rather dubious for those thousands of small entities. We can imagine thousands of lists that some people might find interesting, yet such lists get deleted all the time if they have not been treated as a group in reliable sources or present a clear, simple navigational aid. These lists are neither. Fram (talk) 10:19, 21 May 2025 (UTC)Keep''' and clean up. These sorts of comparisons are commonplace and well known - sources ask What Countries In Europe Will Fit Inside Texas?, or compare the size of Ireland to the size of West Virginia and Indiana. If all the islands are all removed from the lists, as suggested, then the lists nominated here could be merged into a single one. I would support that merge as well. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:42, 20 May 2025 (UTC) Comparisons of size (or economy, or population) of countries vs. US states are quite common. Comparisons between most entries on List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 50 to 250 square kilometers seem to be nonexistent. No one ever cared that Elba, Mersch (canton) and South Dublin are nearly the same size. Fram (talk) 07:15, 21 May 2025 (UTC) We have already agreed that islands that are not their own administrative subdivision should not be included in these lists, and South Dublin, not being a top-level administrative subdivision, should be removed as well. That is a cleanup task, not a cause for deletion of the entire world. BD2412 T 13:47, 21 May 2025 (UTC) Missing the point again. I'll change it to "No one ever cared that Yerevan, Mersch (canton) and San Juan–Laventille are nearly the same size." if that helps you. Fram (talk) 14:05, 21 May 2025 (UTC) Would you suggest that List of first-level administrative divisions by area should not exist, then? Surely no one has ever demonstrably cared if Hormozgan province, North Kalimantan, and Morogoro Region are nearly the same size. If not, what is the distinction? BD2412 T 14:53, 21 May 2025 (UTC) I don't know if it should exist. I note that it has a clear cut-off of 75,000 km², so all these small to very small, barely known administrative divisions (outside their own country, and with exceptions of course) are at least not included. Even then, I doubt many sources and people are interested to know whether Bahia is larger or smaller than Khanty-Mansi. It looks as if all sources are about one country only, none about the cross-country comparison. But the lists at AFD now are in any case a lot worse (apart from cleanup aspect), for mixing multiple levels and including much more obscure, small to very small administrative divisions which will have appeared much less often in comparisons (I can imagine people writing things like "Hokkaido, which is about the size of South Carolina" or vice versa: like I said, I can not imagine anyone (or certainly not any reliable source) saying anything like "Mersch, which is about the size of San Juan-Laventille", so why should we be making that comparison? Fram (talk) 15:07, 21 May 2025 (UTC) For what it's worth there seems to be some'' interest in comparing smaller entities of different countries, like in this article comparing London, Madrid, Paris, Manhattan. Daranios (talk) 15:11, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 50 to 250 square kilometers
Table of Content
[[:List of political and geographic subdivisions by total area from 50 to 250 square kilometers]]
File:Gun Carriage Factory Jabalpur.svg
Valid SVG
File:Gun Carriage Factory Jabalpur.svg
Summary
Summary
File:Gun Carriage Factory Jabalpur.svg
Licensing
Licensing
File:Gun Carriage Factory Jabalpur.svg
Table of Content
Valid SVG, Summary, Licensing
Maman (café)
Short description
Maman is an American French-inspired chain of bakery-cafes, headquartered in New York City. It was founded in October 2014, and as of June 2024, the company has 37+ stores across the United States and Canada. The cafe currently serves coffee, pastries, and French cuisine.
Maman (café)
History
History French for "mother", Maman was founded by Canadian Elisa Marshall and French Benjamin Sormonte in October 2014, with the first location opening up in the SoHo neighborhood of Manhattan, New York City. Following this, the company opened their second location in Toronto. Maman's Holiday Trio 12-Cookie Gift Box (which includes the Nutty Chocolate Chip, White Chocolate Candy Cane Pretzel, and Gingerbread Oatmeal Raisin cookies) was named on Oprah's Favorite Things list of 2017. In 2020, TriSpan, a London and New York-based private equity firm that came aboard, acquiring 50%, with the remainder owned by Marshall and Soromonte.
Maman (café)
Locations
Locations
Maman (café)
United States
United States
Maman (café)
New York
New York SoHo, Manhattan
Maman (café)
New Jersey
New Jersey Jersey City
Maman (café)
[[Maryland]]
Maryland Bethesda
Maman (café)
Virginia
Virginia Fairfax
Maman (café)
Washington, D.C.<ref>{{Cite web
Washington, D.C. Georgetown Union Market Penn Quarter DuPont
Maman (café)
Florida<ref>{{Cite web
Florida Miami Beach
Maman (café)
Connecticut
Connecticut Greenwich
Maman (café)
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania Ardmore
Maman (café)
Canada
Canada Toronto Montreal
Maman (café)
Lifestyle Brand
Lifestyle Brand Maman has expanded to selling a cookbook and apparel, including children’s clothing and a partnership with baby apparel brand, Lalo.
Maman (café)
References
References
Maman (café)
External links
External links Category:Coffee companies of the United States Category:Bakery cafés
Maman (café)
Table of Content
Short description, History, Locations, United States, New York, New Jersey, [[Maryland]], Virginia, Washington, D.C.<ref>{{Cite web, Florida<ref>{{Cite web, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Canada, Lifestyle Brand, References, External links
Yair Zakovitch
short description
Yair Zakovitch (born in 1945) is a biblical scholar and Professor Emeritus in the Department of Bible at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He is the Israel Prize winner for his achievements in Biblical Studies for the year 2021.
Yair Zakovitch
Biography
Biography Yair Zakovitch grew up in Haifa, the son of a Haifa port worker. He completed his undergraduate studies at the University of Haifa, received his Master's degree from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in 1972, and in 1978, he completed his doctoral dissertation at the Hebrew University on the topic "On Three and Four: The Literary Pattern of Three-Four in the Bible." His research fields and publications include literary reading, intra-biblical interpretation, and beliefs and opinions in the Bible, as well as the relationship between post-biblical literature (Second Temple period, rabbinic literature, and early Christianity) and the Bible. In his research, Zakovitch explores hidden polemics in biblical stories and echoes of ancient traditions that were excluded from the canon. Among other things, Zakovitch believes in two interpretative doctrines for uncovering early traditions:Zakovitch, Yair (1992). Mavo le-farshanut panim miqrait [Introduction to Inner-Biblical Interpretation] (in Hebrew). Rekhes. ISBN 9780802803887. the "Law of Center and Periphery", how marginalized traditions can be traced in less prominent biblical narratives, and the "Safety Valve", the inclusion of alternative perspectives while maintaining the dominant narrative.Zakovitch, Yair (2012). Ya'akov: ha-sippur ha-mafli'a shel avi ha-uma Jacob: The Surprising Story of the Father of a Nation] (in Hebrew). Dvir.Zakovitch, Yair (1995). David: me-ro'eh le-mashiaḥ [David: From a Shepherd to a Messiah] (in Hebrew). Yad Izhak Ben-Zvi. Zakovitch served as head of the Bible Department from 1987 to 1989, head of the Mandel Institute for Jewish Studies from 1995 to 1997, and Dean of the Faculty of Humanities at the Hebrew University from 1997 to 2001. He also chaired the Bible Studies Committee at the Ministry of Education from 1981 to 1984 and again from 2003 to 2011. Zakovitch is one of the initiators and founders (with Alan David Hoffmann) of the "Revivim" () program for training teachers to teach Jewish Studies. He has served as a visiting lecturer at the University of Pennsylvania, the University of California, Berkeley, the Jewish Theological Seminary of America (JTS), and Harvard University. He is a recipient of the Israel Prize for Biblical Studies for the year 2021, a Fellow at the Open University, and an honorary Doctor of Divinity from the Jewish Theological Seminary of America. He resides in Givat Yeshayahu, Israel.
Yair Zakovitch
Books
Books
Yair Zakovitch
Articles
Articles "The Sun Stood Still at Gibeon: The Evolution of a Miracle" (שמש בגבעון דום: גלגוליו של נס), in: Gal Weinstein: The Sun Stood Still at Gibeon, ed. Tami Katz-Freiman, The Israeli Pavilion, Venice Biennale, 2017, pp. 144–148. "Concrete Metaphors and Metaphorical Language in Biblical Interpretation—Internal and External" (קונקרטיזציה של מטפורות ולשון מטפורית בפרשנות המקרא - פנימית וחיצונית), Shnaton: An Annual for Biblical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies 24 (2016), pp. 5–55. "'A Thousand Shall Be Yours, Solomon' (Song 8:12): On the Tradition of Solomon's Thousand Wives" (האלף לך שלמה...), in: Shemut Ve-Ruach: Festschrift for Avraham Shapira, eds. A. Zakai, P. Mendes-Flohr, Z. Gries, Jerusalem 2015, pp. 255–263. "My Son, My Son Absalom – A Father's Lament, Not a King's" (בני, בני אבשלום – קינת אב ולא קינת מלך), in: Lev Avot al Banim, eds. Y. Shaviv and B. Offen, Alon Shvut 2014, pp. 252–259. "On Plagues, Miracles, Angels, and the Immunity of Jerusalem" (על מגפות, ניסים, מלאכים וחסינות ירושלים), in: Jerusalem – Medical File, ed. N. Shalev-Kalifa, Jerusalem 2014, pp. 29–36. "On Four Sick Kings in Jerusalem" (על ארבעה מלכים חולים בירושלים), same vol., pp. 51–56. "On Borders and Crossing Them" (על גבולות וחצייתם), in: L. Ramon, Through the Window She Gazed (with A. Shinan), Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuchad, 2012, pp. 11–23. Roundtable Contribution: "Are We Still the People of the Book?" (האם אנחנו עדיין עם הספר?), Zehuyot, Issue 1 (2012), pp. 102–106. "The Legion Among the Swine – Bible, Midrash, and Allegory (Matt. 8:28–34; Mark 5:1–20; Luke 8:26–39)" (לגיון הזרים בעדרי חזירים...), in: Like a Dream and a Dybbuk – On Dreams and Possession, eds. R. Elior, Y. Bilu, Y. Zakovitch, A. Shinan, Jerusalem: Magnes, 2013, pp. 235–256. "Three 'Who Is This?' Questions in Song of Songs" (על שלוש שאלות 'מי זאת' בשיר השירים), in: Merakim: Culture, Literature, Folklore, eds. H. Salomon and A. Shinan, Jerusalem 2013, pp. 33–40. "Psalm 135 – A Mosaic of Verses, Its Meaning and Intent" (תהלים קלה – פסיפס כתובים), in: Zer Rimonim, eds. M. Avioz, A. Asis, Y. Shemesh, Atlanta 2013, pp. 286–296. "Inner-Biblical Interpretation" (פרשנות פנים מקראית), in: Biblical Literature: Introductions and Studies, ed. Z. Talshir, Vol. I, Jerusalem 2011, pp. 429–453. "From Crisis to Correction: Return to Eden in Isa 51:1–3" (משבר לתיקון: השיבה לגן ה'), in: Fracture and Repair, eds. A. Shinan, A. Bilski, Jerusalem 2010, pp. 28–34. "Is the Tree of Knowledge the Tree of Life?" (עץ הדעת הוא עץ החיים?), in: Paradise of Old, ed. R. Elior, Jerusalem 2010, pp. 63–70. "The Exodus as the Big Bang – A Reading of Psalm 114" (יציאת מצרים המפץ הגדול), in: Sefer Michael, ed. A. Sagi, Jerusalem–Even Yehuda 2008, pp. 81–96. "Woman (in the Bible)" (אישה במקרא), in: Zman Yehudi Hadash, Vol. I, Jerusalem 2007, pp. 174–178. "Bread of Miracle and Wonder" (לחם נס ופלא), with A. Shinan, in: Bread in the Religions and Communities of Israel, ed. N. Ben-Yosef, Israel Museum, Jerusalem 2006, pp. 29–45. "The Book of Moses in the Book of David" (ספר משה בספר דוד), in: Moses: Father of the Prophets, eds. M. Halamish, H. Kasher, H. Ben-Pazi, Ramat Gan 2011, pp. 45–52. "On the D–Ts Interchange in Biblical Hebrew" (על חילופי ד-צ בלשון המקרא), in: Festschrift for Avi Hurvitz, Jerusalem 2009, pp. 113–120. "'I' and 'We' in the Psalms" (אנכי ואנחנו בשירת תהלים), in: On the Individual and the Collective, eds. A. Bilski et al., Tel Aviv 2007, pp. 46–51. "Hints, Allusions, and Textual Criticism" (רומזים, נרמזים וביקורת הנוסח), in: Festschrift for Sarah Japhet, eds. M. Bar-Asher et al., Jerusalem 2008, pp. 323–331. "Midrashic Interpretations of the Name Zion – From Ruin to Redemption" (מדרשי השם ציון), in: Eretz-Israel 28 (Teddy Kollek Volume), Jerusalem 2008, pp. 203–208. "Basic Law and Its Foundations – Basic Law: Israel Lands" (חוק-יסוד ויסודותיו), in: Shoreshim ba-Mishpat, ed. D. Zilber, Nevo, 2020, pp. 151–[end] (with Orit Koteb). "In the Looking for Closeness to God", in: A. Brenninkmeijer-Werhahn (ed.), Marriage – Constancy and Change in Togetherness, Symposion vol. 15, Vienna 2017, pp. 156–169. "Do the Last Verses of Malachi (Mal 3:22–24) Have a Canonical Function? A Biblical Puzzle", in: E. Di Pede & D. Scaiola (eds.), The Book of the Twelve – One Book or Many?, Tübingen 2016, pp. 60–81. "Keep Your Thousand, Solomon! (Song 8:12): A History of the Tradition of Solomon's Thousand Wives", in: S. M. Attard & M. Pavan (eds.), Studi in onore del prof. Gianni Barbiero, Rome: Gregorian and Biblical Press, 2015, pp. 359–370. "Why Is 'A' Placed Next to 'B'? Juxtaposition in the Bible and Beyond", in: M. Kister et al. (eds.), Tradition, Transmission, and Transformation, Leiden 2015, pp. 322–342 (with A. Shinan). "Reading Biblical Narrative", in: The Jewish Study Bible, 2nd ed., eds. A. Berlin & M.Z. Brettler, Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 2191–2201. "On the Ordering of Psalms as Demonstrated by Psalms 136–150", in: The Oxford Handbook of the Psalms, ed. W.P. Brown, Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 214–228. "The Bible's Hidden Dictionary: The Example of Psalms", in: A. Grund et al. (eds.), Ich will dir danken unter den Völkern, Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 2013, pp. 299–305. "Intermarriage and Halakhic Creativity: The Book of Ruth", INTAMS Review 19.1 (2013), pp. 56–69. "Inner-Biblical Interpretation", in: M. Henze (ed.), A Companion to Biblical Interpretation in Early Judaism, Grand Rapids 2012, pp. 27–63. "Scripture and Israeli Secular Culture – Past, Present, Future", in: B.D. Sommer (ed.), Jewish Concepts of Scripture, New York–London 2012, pp. 299–316. "A Woman of Valor (Prov. 31:10–31): A Conservative Response to the Song of Songs", in: D.J.A. Clines & E. van Wolde (eds.), A Critical Engagement, Sheffield 2011, pp. 401–413. "Ruth"; "Jonah", in: The New Oxford Annotated Bible, New York 2010, pp. 392–398, 1301–1305. "Inner-Biblical Interpretation", in: R. Hendel (ed.), Reading Genesis – Ten Methods, Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 92–118. "Humor and Theology or the Successful Failure of Israelite Intelligence: A Literary-Folkloric Approach to Joshua 2." In Text and Tradition: The Hebrew Bible and Folklore. Edited by Susan Niditch, page 75. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1990.
Yair Zakovitch
References
References Category:Israel Prize in biblical studies recipients Category:Living people Category:1945 births Category:Date of birth missing (living people) Category:People from Haifa Category:20th-century Israeli historians Category:21st-century Israeli historians Category:21st-century Jewish biblical scholars Category:21st-century Christian biblical scholars Category:Academic staff of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Category:University of Haifa alumni Category:Jewish encyclopedists Category:Moshavniks Category:Mateh Yehuda Regional Council
Yair Zakovitch
Table of Content
short description, Biography, Books, Articles, References
Government of the British Raj
#
redirect British Raj#Organisation
Government of the British Raj
Table of Content
#
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freeky
[[:Freeky]]
:Freeky – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination) () Non-notable single (song). It can be redirected to Ai Otsuka per WP:ATD. Mekomo (talk) 15:16, 19 May 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:38, 19 May 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:38, 19 May 2025 (UTC) Redirect to Marble (EP): Not enough reliable sources to explain notability outside this subject. 🦅White-tailed eagleTalk to the eagleStalking eagle 17:03, 19 May 2025 (UTC) "Not enough relaible sources"? The news from the artist's official website about this release, an article by Billboard Japan about the digital release of this single, plus an interview in which it explains its creative process from the artists themselves, all seem pretty reliable to me. クラウデド (talk) 17:51, 19 May 2025 (UTC) Redirect Only one mention from Billboard Japan is not enough. The other sources are reliable, but it is by an interest third-party, in this case the artists and label. Need more independent sources. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 07:34, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freeky
Table of Content
[[:Freeky]]
File:Shera Nayok.jpeg
Orphaned non-free revisions
File:Shera Nayok.jpeg
Summary
Summary
File:Shera Nayok.jpeg
Licensing
Licensing
File:Shera Nayok.jpeg
Table of Content
Orphaned non-free revisions, Summary, Licensing
Gualala roach
Short description
The Gualala roach (Hesperoleucus parvipinnis) is a species of freshwater ray-finned fish belonging to the family Leuciscidae, which includes the daces, chubs, Eurasian minnows and related species. This species is endemic to California.
Gualala roach
Taxonomy
Taxonomy The Gualala roach was first formally described in 1913 by the American ichthyologist John Otterbein Snyder with its type locality given as the Wheatfield Fork of Gualala River in Sonoma County, California. This taxon was previously considered to be a synonym of the California roach (H. symmetricus) but in 2019 it was shown to be a valid species. Thie genus Hesperoleucus is classified within the subfamily Laviniinae, the Western chubs, within the family Leuciscidae.
Gualala roach
Etymology
Etymology The Gualala roach is classified within the genus Hesperoleucus, this name combines the Latin word Hesperus, which means "western", and leucos, which is thought to be a shortening of Myloleucus, a synonym of Gila. This name reflects that the species in this genus are found in Western North America and their similarity to Gila. The specific name prefixes pinna, which mean "fin", with parvi, meaning "small", a reference to the small, rounded fins.
Gualala roach
Description
Description The Gualala roach is a small fish with the adults having typical length of , they have a similar bronzy color to the California roach (H. symmetricus). It can be distinguished from other species in the genus Hesperoleucus in having smaller scales, with between 54 and 65 scales along its [lateral line]], a shorter snout, shorter rounded fins and a thicker body. The number of fin rays in the dorsal fin is 7-8, averaging at 8 and between 6 and 8 anal fin rays, averaging 6. There is a aple stripe with a width of 2 scales along the flanks, above the lateral line, there is a thinner darker stripe blow this and several thinnergark stripes which fade towards the belly.
Gualala roach
Distribution
Distribution The Gualala roach is endemic to the Gualala River system in Sonoma County, California. It is most numerous in the warmer waters of the Southern and Wheatfield Forks and their tributaries but it is less common in the cooler Northern Fork, and in the mainstrean below its confluence with the Northern Fork.
Gualala roach
References
References Category:Hesperoleucus Category:Fish described in 1913 Category:Taxa named by John Otterbein Snyder
Gualala roach
Table of Content
Short description, Taxonomy, Etymology, Description, Distribution, References
File:MKU (company).svg
Valid SVG
File:MKU (company).svg
Summary
Summary
File:MKU (company).svg
Licensing
Licensing
File:MKU (company).svg
Table of Content
Valid SVG, Summary, Licensing
Draft:Yong Yang
AFC submission
Yong Yang (1984 – May 2, 2024) was a Korean American man who was fatally shot by a Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) officer during a mental health crisis at his family's Koreatown apartment. The incident drew national attention and sparked discussions about law enforcement's handling of mental health emergencies.
Draft:Yong Yang
Background
Background Yang had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder and schizoaffective disorder. On May 2, 2024, his family contacted the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health (DMH) seeking assistance for his mental health crisis. A DMH clinician and assistant arrived at the scene but called 911 shortly after, alleging that Yang had attempted to attack the clinician with a knife.
Draft:Yong Yang
Incident
Incident LAPD officers, including Officer Andres Lopez, responded to the 911 call. Upon arrival, they entered the apartment using a key provided by the family. Inside, they encountered Yang holding a kitchen knife. Officer Lopez fired multiple shots, fatally wounding Yang in the living room.
Draft:Yong Yang
Aftermath
Aftermath The LAPD's Force Investigation Division conducted a review of the incident. In April 2025, the Los Angeles Police Commission concluded that while the use of deadly force was within policy, Officer Lopez's tactics deviated from department-approved training and warranted administrative disapproval. Yang's family filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the city, alleging excessive force and failure to accommodate his mental health condition. They have also demanded the release of all evidence related to the shooting.
Draft:Yong Yang
Community Response
Community Response The incident prompted protests and calls for police reform, particularly concerning the handling of mental health crises. Community leaders and advocacy groups have highlighted the need for alternative response models that prioritize de-escalation and mental health expertise.
Draft:Yong Yang
See also
See also List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States, May 2024 Police use of deadly force in the United States Mental health crisis intervention
Draft:Yong Yang
References
References :Category:1984 births :Category:2024 deaths :Category:People shot dead by law enforcement officers in the United States :Category:Deaths by firearm in California :Category:Korean-American people :Category:People with bipolar disorder :Category:People with schizoaffective disorder :Category:People from Los Angeles
Draft:Yong Yang
Table of Content
AFC submission, Background, Incident, Aftermath, Community Response, See also, References
File:Nexus, Tyne and Wear PTE logo, October 2022.svg
Valid SVG
File:Nexus, Tyne and Wear PTE logo, October 2022.svg
Summary
Summary
File:Nexus, Tyne and Wear PTE logo, October 2022.svg
Licensing
Licensing
File:Nexus, Tyne and Wear PTE logo, October 2022.svg
Table of Content
Valid SVG, Summary, Licensing
Draft:Superstruct Entertainment
Short description
Superstruct Entertainment is a British live entertainment company and one of the world's largest festival promoters. It was founded in 2017 by James Barton, the founder of Creamfields and former Live Nation executive, and Roderik Schlosser. As of March 2023, the company had acquired over 85 festivals in Australia and Europe, making it the second-largest festival promoter in the world. In June 2024, the company was acquired from private equity firm Providence Equity Partners by KRR. In January 2025, it acquired Boiler Room from DICE for an undisclosed sum.
Draft:Superstruct Entertainment
Controversy
Controversy Following the acquisition by KKR, there have been boycotts and backlash by artists, due its stakes in weapons manufacturing companies, the Coastal GasLink pipeline, and in Israeli corporations operating in occupied Palestinian territories. As of May 2025, fifteen artists had dropped out of the 2025 edition of Field Day due to Superstruct's ownership by private equity firm KKR.
Draft:Superstruct Entertainment
Current properties
Current properties Boiler Room Field Day ID&T Q-dance Lost Village Mighty Hoopla Sónar Snowbombing Tramlines Festival Victorious Festival
Draft:Superstruct Entertainment
References
References
Draft:Superstruct Entertainment
Table of Content
Short description, Controversy, Current properties, References
Bibliography of the Battle of Britain
Short description
This general annotated bibliography page provides an overview of notable notable works in the English language regarding the Battle of Britain.
Bibliography of the Battle of Britain
General
General . Buckley, John. Air Power in the Age of Total War. London: UCL Press, 1999. . Buell, Thomas. The Second World War: Europe and the Mediterranean. New York: Square One Publishers, 2002. . (hardcover), 2002, (paperback). (2015 paperback edition) Collier, Basil. The Defence of the United Kingdom (1962, Official history) Collier, Basil. The Battle of Britain (1962, Batsford's British Battles series) Collier, Richard. Eagle Day: The Battle of Britain, 6 August – 15 September 1940. London: Pan Books, 1968. Churchill, Winston S. The Second World War – The Grand Alliance (Volume 3). Bantam Books, 1962. (Originally published: London: Jonathan Cape, 1977.) . Ellis, John. Brute Force: Allied Strategy and Tactics in the Second World War. London: Andre Deutsch, 1990. . Evans, Michael. "Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to ... the Navy." The Times, 24 August 2006. Retrieved: 3 March 2007. Goodenough, Simon. War Maps: World War II, From September 1939 to August 1945, Air, Sea, and Land, Battle by Battle. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1982, . Harding, Thomas. "Battle of Britain was won at sea." The Telegraph, 25 August 2006. Retrieved: 25 August 2006. Keegan, John. The Second World War London: Pimlico, 1997. . (hardcover, paperback, 2002) Owen, R.E, New Zealanders with the Royal Air Force Government Printer, Wellington, New Zealand 1953. Pope, Stephan. "Across the Ether: Part One". Aeroplane, Vol. 23, No. 5, Issue No. 265, May 1995. Robinson, Derek, Invasion, 1940: Did the Battle of Britain Alone Stop Hitler? New York: Carroll & Graf, 2005. . Shulman, Milton. Defeat in the West. London: Cassell, 2004 (First edition 1947). . Stacey, C P. (1970) Arms, Men and Governments: The War Policies of Canada, 1939–1945 Queen's Printer, Ottawa (Downloadable PDF) Terraine, John, A Time for Courage: The Royal Air Force in the European War, 1939–1945. London: Macmillan, 1985. .
Bibliography of the Battle of Britain
Luftwaffe
Luftwaffe Corum, James. The Luftwaffe: Creating the Operational Air War, 1918–1940. Lawrence, Kansas: Kansas University Press, 1997. . de Zeng, Henry L., Doug G. Stankey and Eddie J. Creek. Bomber Units of the Luftwaffe 1933–1945: A Reference Source, Volume 1. Hersham, Surrey, UK: Ian Allan Publishing, 2007. . Dildy, Douglas C. "The Air Battle for England: The Truth Behind the Failure of the Luftwaffe's Counter-Air Campaign in 1940." Air Power History 63.2 (2016): 27. Dönitz, Karl. Ten years and Twenty Days. New York: Da Capo Press, First Edition, 1997. . . Kieser, Egbert. Operation Sea Lion; The German Plan to Invade Britain 1940. London: Cassel Military Paperbacks, 1999. . Macksey, Kenneth. Invasion: The German Invasion of England, July 1940. London: Greenhill Books, 1990. . Mason, Francis K. Battle Over Britain: A History of the German Air Assaults on Great Britain, 1917–18 and July–December 1940, and the Development of Air Defences Between the World Wars. New York: Doubleday, 1969. . Raeder, Erich. Erich Rader, Grand Admiral. New York: Da Capo Press; United States Naval Institute, 2001. .
Bibliography of the Battle of Britain
Autobiographies and biographies
Autobiographies and biographies Brew, Steve. A Ruddy Awful Waste: Eric Lock DSO, DFC & Bar; The Brief Life of a Battle of Britain Fighter Ace. London: Fighting High, 2016. Collier, Basil. Leader of the Few: the Authorised Biography of Air Chief Marshal Lord Dowding of Bentley Priory. London: Jarrolds, 1957. Franks, Norman, Wings of Freedom: Twelve Battle of Britain Pilots. London: William Kimber, 1980. . Halpenny, Bruce, Fight for the Sky: Stories of Wartime Fighter Pilots. Cambridge, UK: Patrick Stephens, 1986. . Halpenny, Bruce, Fighter Pilots in World War II: True Stories of Frontline Air Combat (paperback). Barnsley, UK: Pen and Sword Books Ltd, 2004. .
Bibliography of the Battle of Britain
Aircraft
Aircraft . de Zeng, Henry L., Doug G. Stankey and Eddie J. Creek, Bomber Units of the Luftwaffe 1933–1945: A Reference Source, Volume 2. Hersham, Surrey, UK: Ian Allan Publishing, 2007. . . Goss, Chris, Dornier 17: In Focus. Surrey, UK: Red Kite Books, 2005. . . Huntley, Ian D., Fairey Battle, Aviation Guide 1. Bedford, UK: SAM Publications, 2004. . Mason, Francis K., Hawker Aircraft since 1920. London: Putnam, 1991. . Molson, Kenneth M. et al., Canada's National Aviation Museum: Its History and Collections. Ottawa: National Aviation Museum, 1988. . Moyes, Philip, J. R., "The Fairey Battle." Aircraft in Profile, Volume 2 (nos. 25–48). Windsor, Berkshire, UK: Profile Publications, 1971. Parry, Simon W., Intruders over Britain: The Story of the Luftwaffe's Night Intruder Force, the Fernnachtjager. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Books, 1989. . Scutts, Jerry, Messerschmitt Bf 109: The Operational Record. Sarasota, Florida: Crestline Publishers, 1996. .
Bibliography of the Battle of Britain
Additional references
Additional references Addison, Paul and Jeremy Crang. The Burning Blue: A New History of the Battle of Britain. London: Pimlico, 2000. . Bergström, Christer. Barbarossa – The Air Battle: July–December 1941. London: Chevron/Ian Allan, 2007. . Bergström, Christer. The Battle of Britain – An Epic Battle Revisited. Eskilstuna: Vaktel Books/Casemate, 2010. . Bishop, Patrick. Fighter Boys: The Battle of Britain, 1940. New York: Viking, 2003 (hardcover, ); Penguin Books, 2004. . As Fighter Boys: Saving Britain 1940. London: Harper Perennial, 2004. . Brittain, Vera. England's Hour. London: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2005 (paperback, ); Obscure Press (paperback, ). . Cooper, Matthew. The German Air Force 1933–1945: An Anatomy of Failure. New York: Jane's Publishing Incorporated, 1981. . Craig, Phil and Tim Clayton. Finest Hour: The Battle of Britain. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000. (hardcover); 2006, (paperback). Cumming, Anthony J. The Royal Navy and The Battle of Britain. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press, 2010. . Fiedler, Arkady. 303 Squadron: The Legendary Battle of Britain Fighter Squadron. Los Angeles: Aquila Polonica, 2010. . Fisher, David E. A Summer Bright and Terrible: Winston Churchill, Lord Dowding, Radar and the Impossible Triumph of the Battle of Britain. Emeryville, CA: Shoemaker & Hoard, 2005. (hardcover, ); 2006, (paperback). Gaskin, Margaret. Blitz: The Story of 29 December 1940. New York: Harcourt, 2006. . . Haining, Peter. Where the Eagle Landed: The Mystery of the German Invasion of Britain, 1940. London: Robson Books, 2004. . Halpenny, Bruce Barrymore. Action Stations: Military Airfields of Greater London v. 8. Cambridge, UK: Patrick Stephens, 1984. . Harding, Thomas. "It's baloney, say RAF aces". The Telegraph, 24 August 2006. Retrieved: 3 March 2007. Hough, Richard. The Battle of Britain: The Greatest Air Battle of World War II. New York: W.W. Norton, 1989. (hardcover); 2005, (paperback). James, T.C.G. The Battle of Britain (Air Defence of Great Britain; vol. 2). London/New York: Frank Cass Publishers, 2000. (hardcover); (paperback, ). James, T.C.G. Growth of Fighter Command, 1936–1940 (Air Defence of Great Britain; vol. 1). London; New York: Frank Cass Publishers, 2000. . James, T.C.G. Night Air Defence During the Blitz. London/New York: Frank Cass Publishers, 2003. . McGlashan, Kenneth B. with Owen P. Zupp. Down to Earth: A Fighter Pilot Recounts His Experiences of Dunkirk, the Battle of Britain, Dieppe, D-Day and Beyond. London: Grub Street Publishing, 2007. . March, Edgar J. British Destroyers; a History of Development 1892–1953. London: Seely Service & Co. Limited, 1966. . NB: This book is also published under the following title: For Your Freedom and Ours: The Kościuszko Squadron – Forgotten Heroes of World War II. Mason, Francis K. "Battle over Britain". McWhirter Twins Ltd. 1969 {A day by day accounting of RaF and Luftwaffe losses} Prien, Jochen and Peter Rodeike.Messerschmitt Bf 109 F, G, and K: An Illustrated Study. Atglen, Pennsylvania: Schiffer Publishing, 1995. . Ray, John Philip. The Battle of Britain: New Perspectives: Behind the Scenes of the Great Air War. London: Arms & Armour Press, 1994 (hardcover, ); London: Orion Publishing, 1996 (paperback, ). Rongers, Eppo H. De oorlog in mei '40, Utrecht/Antwerpen: Uitgeverij Het Spectrum N.V., 1969, No ISBN Townsend, Peter. Duel of Eagles (new edition). London: Phoenix, 2000. . Wellum, Geoffrey. First Light: The Story of the Boy Who Became a Man in the War-Torn Skies Above Britain. New York: Viking Books, 2002. (hardcover); Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons, 2003. (hardcover); London: Penguin Books, 2003. (paperback). . Battle of Britain Battle of Britain Category:Conflicts in 1940 Category:World War II aerial operations and battles of the Western European Theatre Battle of Britain Battle of Britain Category:Aerial operations and battles of World War II involving the United Kingdom Category:Aerial operations and battles of World War II involving Germany Britain Britain Britain Category:Aerial operations and battles of World War II involving Canada Battle of Britain Category:World War II operations and battles of the Western European Theatre Category:Bibliographies of World War II
Bibliography of the Battle of Britain
Table of Content
Short description, General, Luftwaffe, Autobiographies and biographies, Aircraft, Additional references
File:Samtel Group.svg
Valid SVG
File:Samtel Group.svg
Summary
Summary
File:Samtel Group.svg
Licensing
Licensing
File:Samtel Group.svg
Table of Content
Valid SVG, Summary, Licensing
File:Dui Prithibi 2015 movie.jpeg
Orphaned non-free revisions
File:Dui Prithibi 2015 movie.jpeg
Summary
Summary
File:Dui Prithibi 2015 movie.jpeg
Licensing
Licensing
File:Dui Prithibi 2015 movie.jpeg
Table of Content
Orphaned non-free revisions, Summary, Licensing
Category:Dear America novels
Cat main article
Category:American children's novels Category:American historical novels Category:Children's historical novels Category:Fictional diaries Category:Novels by series Category:Scholastic Corporation books Category:American children's book series
Category:Dear America novels
Table of Content
Cat main article
Template:Taxonomy/Cnidochloa
Don't edit this line {{{machine code
Template:Taxonomy/Cnidochloa
Table of Content
Don't edit this line {{{machine code
File:Samtel Avionics.svg
Valid SVG
File:Samtel Avionics.svg
Summary
Summary
File:Samtel Avionics.svg
Licensing
Licensing
File:Samtel Avionics.svg
Table of Content
Valid SVG, Summary, Licensing
Scott Burnside
Short description
Scott Burnside (born 1963) is a Canadian sportswriter. Burnside began a career in sportswriting with the Windsor Star where he covered the Stanley Cup championships by the Detroit Red Wings in 1997 and 1998. He was the National Post sports columnist when the paper began publication in 1998, then covered the Toronto Maple Leafs for the Ottawa Citizen, and was a special correspondent for USA Today on the Atlanta Thrashers. Covering the National Hockey League (NHL) for ESPN for 13 years, Burnside's stories explained why something happened and gave a behind-the-scenes perspective. He was president of the Professional Hockey Writers' Association from 2013 to 2017, and subsequently wrote for The Athletic, Daily Faceoff, and cohosted an ice hockey podcast with Pierre LeBrun. Burnside has also wrote web site articles for multiple teams and the NHL Players' Association. He received the 2024 Elmer Ferguson Memorial Award at the Hockey Hall of Fame, in recognition of a career in ice hockey journalism. A graduate of journalism at Carleton University, Burnside was a columnist and spot news reporter for the Windsor Star and Toronto Sun before his sportswriting career. With the Windsor Star, he won multiple Western Ontario Newspaper Awards, and the special project category at the National Newspaper Awards. After three years covering the criminal trials of Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka for the Toronto Sun, he cowrote the book Deadly Innocence published in 1995, and won two Edward Dunlop Awards and a Jamie Westcott Award for his crime writing.
Scott Burnside
Early life and education
Early life and education Burnside was born in Milton, Ontario, in 1963. He played minor ice hockey in the Essex-Kent Juvenile Hockey League, and was twice invited to training camps for the Essex 73's, while attending Essex District High School from grades 11 to 13. He subsequently earned bachelor of arts degrees in journalism at Carleton University, and in education at University of Ottawa. While at Carlton, he contributed two years of research and was the lead writer of a book on the history of Maidstone Township. Not knowing what he wanted to do in the future, Burnside joked that he might work for the National Enquirer. He began in journalism as a freelancer for the Ottawa Sun, reporting on hockey and the Hull Olympiques.
Scott Burnside
News and crime reporter
News and crime reporter Writing for the Windsor Star from 1986 to 1992, Burnside was a columnist and spot news reporter, often covering events at Windsor City Hall. In 1989, he won the Western Ontario Newspaper Award for spot reporting, covering a shooting death by the Tactics and Rescue Unit of the Ontario Provincial Police. In 1990, his five-day series on shift work cowritten with Grace Macaluso and Ellen van Wageningen, won the family section feature at the Western Ontario Newspaper Awards, and won the special project category at the National Newspaper Awards. The series focused on problems facing shift workers, and revealed that nearly half of the workers in Windsor and Essex County worked outside of normal business hours. Teaching English in Prague while on leave of absence in 1991, Burnside wrote about language barriers for him and tourists in Pečky, and the local success of British rock band Ten Years After. Writing investigative articles about Czechoslovakia, he detailed the transition into a market economy as the government sold off small businesses to fund the State Bank of Czechoslovakia, and reported on environmental issues in Czechoslovakia, and the economics behind water treatment and land restoration. In 1992, Burnside received a Southam News President's Award for cowriting the education series, "Our Failing Schools". Moving to the Toronto Sun in 1992, Burnside and Al Cairns covered a series of rapes across Southern Ontario, including the murders of Tammy Homolka, Leslie Mahaffy, and Kristen French. Burnside and Cairns spent three years covering the criminal trials of Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka for the "schoolgirl murders", then cowrote the book Deadly Innocence. The book published in September 1995 by Warner Books, was based on facts from the trial and outside sources. The book contained few details of the assaults, but concentrated on what not heard at the trial, based on interviews of friends of Bernardo and Homolka. Burnside won two Edward Dunlop Awards and a Jamie Westcott Award for his crime writing with the Toronto Sun.
Scott Burnside
Sports journalism career
Sports journalism career Burnside became the Windsor Star sports columnist in 1997, when the newspaper expanded sports coverage and shifted to a morning publication. He stated in a 2024 interview, that he "was really looking for something different after the Bernardo trial", but had never planned on covering sports. He reported on sports in Windsor and Essex County, and in Detroit, and covered his first National Hockey League (NHL) playoffs in 1997. His tenure coincided with consecutive Stanley Cup championships by the Detroit Red Wings in 1997 and 1998. Transitioning to a national newspaper, Burnside wrote about sports for the National Post which began publication in October 1998. In September 2001, he was one of 130 layoffs from the National Post due to budget cuts and lack of profits. Writing for the Ottawa Citizen from 2001 to 2003, Burnside regularly covered the Toronto Maple Leafs and the NHL, and wrote the regular "Inside the Leafs" column. His columns on the Maple Leafs appeared in other Southam News publications,; and for CanWest News Service. He also covered the NHL, the Atlanta Thrashers, and Maple Leafs as a special correspondent for USA Today.; He was also a cast member of Leafs TV during the 2002–03 season. Burnside returned to writing for the National Post from June 2003 until October 2004. During this time, he also covered the Atlanta Thrashers for CanWest and USA Today, and the Toronto Maple Leafs for The Canadian Press.
Scott Burnside
ESPN and the Professional Hockey Writers' Association
ESPN and the Professional Hockey Writers' Association Burnside was covering the NHL for ESPN beginning in October 2004, remaining there for 13 years. His stories explained why something happened, giving fans a behind-the-scenes perspective. He interviewed Sidney Crosby in 2009, discussing the loss by the Pittsburgh Penguins in the 2008 Stanley Cup Finals, Crosby's subsequent recovery from concussions, then the victory in the 2009 Stanley Cup Finals followed by a details of the parade given to Crosby when taking the Stanley Cup home for a day. In 2015, Burnside accompanied Alexander Ovechkin on charity promotions, writing about a night of bowling, and an appearance at Andrews Air Force Base where Ovechkin was attacked by a military dog and used a bomb disposal robot. According to Burnside, his favourite story with ESPN was reporting on the selection process of the United States national team for ice hockey at the 2014 Winter Olympics. He and Kevin Allen of USA Today were the only two journalists given access to the meetings. USA Hockey hoped that the resulting story would popularize the game in the USA, despite the criticism written about the process by Burnside and Allen. The story was one of Burnside's longest in his career, and created more discussion than he anticipated. Burnside was president of the Professional Hockey Writers' Association (PHWA) from 2013 to 2017, which aimed to preserve access for North American media covering ice hockey. He thought the PHWA was facing new challenges since the number of newspaper and radio journalists were decreasing, and being replaced by social media, independent bloggers, and teams producing their own content. During his time as president, he oversaw voting by its members for end-of-season NHL awards, honours for all-stars and rookies, and establishment of two awards—the Jim Kelley Memorial Scholarship in the 2015–16 season for the child of a PHWA member, and the Red Fisher Award in the 2016–17 season for the top NHL journalist. In 2017, ESPN laid off multiple hockey writers including Burnside. Burnside subsequently resigned as PHWA president, and succeeded by Mark Spector of Sportsnet.;
Scott Burnside
Later career
Later career Burnside began writing for the Dallas Stars in 2017, as a digital correspondent on the Stars and the NHL for the team's web site. He felt working for the Stars was a "revelatory hockey season", since he learned how an NHL team operated from an inside perspective. From 2018 to 2021, Burnside was the national hockey writer for The Athletic. During this time, he wrote about the rise and fall of goaltender Ray Emery, who drowned in Lake Ontario at age 35. Burnside joined Daily Faceoff in October 2021 as a senior writer. He also collaborated on a recurring ice hockey podcast with Pierre LeBrun, titled "Two-Man Advantage", discussing the NHL. Other organizations Burnside has written for include the Los Angeles Kings, Nashville Predators, Carolina Hurricanes, Minnesota Wild, and the National Hockey League Players' Association.
Scott Burnside
Honours and reputation
Honours and reputation The PHWA made Burnside lifetime member after serving as president, and selected him to receive the 2024 Elmer Ferguson Memorial Award at the Hockey Hall of Fame, in recognition of a career in ice hockey journalism. PHWA president Frank Seravalli stated, "Burnside is someone who is unafraid to ruffle feathers by reporting on difficult topics or to offer a cutting opinion", and that "He always remained true to himself, and gave back by mentoring countless young hockey writers along the way". Burnside reportedly frequented dive bars, with one such bar in Pittsburgh was known as his "second office" by colleagues. His writing style was to "expose how and why it happened", and produce "pieces he [would] want to read himself", because "he [loved] the storytelling". Minnesota Wild general manager Bill Guerin stated, "No matter what the story is, whether negative or positive, you know [Burnside is] going to be fair", and that "People feel comfortable talking to him because they trust him, no matter the circumstances".
Scott Burnside
Personal life
Personal life Burnside is married to Colleen McEdwards, has one son, plays hockey, baseball, and golf, and is a regular participant in sports betting pools. He resided in Essex, Ontario, while writing for the Windsor Star, and has lived in Metro Atlanta since 2002.