answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 13
1.96k
| question
stringclasses 124
values | id
stringlengths 1
5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
{
"text": [
"562±4mV"
],
"answer_start": [
209
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.101 | The ZnO-based DSSC with the optimal immersion time of 24h for dye CYC-B1 shows an η value of 4.85±0.03%, the open-circuit voltage (VOC), the short-circuit current density (JSC), and the fill factor (FF) being 562±4mV, 13.75±0.05mAcm−2, and 0.63±0.00, respectively. | What is the value of VOC? | 42481 |
{
"text": [
"68.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
80
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.10.004 | PSCs with pristine NiOx HTL got PCE=15.22% with Jsc=20.99mA/cm2, Voc=1.054V, FF=68.8% under the forward scan, and 15.73% of PCE with 21.19mA/cm2 of Jsc, 1.040V of Voc and 71.4% of FF under the reverse scan. | What is the value of FF? | 4952 |
{
"text": [
"5.45%"
],
"answer_start": [
227
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.02.002 | Compared to the L1 reference dye with a conventional triphenylamine (tPA) donor group, the Dhkx-1 dye with a semi-rigid tPA donor unit attained higher Jsc and Voc values leading to a higher power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 5.45%. | What is the value of PCE? | 40944 |
{
"text": [
"75.7%"
],
"answer_start": [
121
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.02.026 | By using CB for PCBM processing, the Voc, Jsc, and FF values of the PSCs were greatly improved to 1.05V, 21.0mAcm−2, and 75.7%, respectively, yielding an improved PCE of 16.7%. | What is the value of FF? | 8206 |
{
"text": [
"15.1±0.6%"
],
"answer_start": [
112
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.205 | Based on the identical fabrication method, the PSCs based on the bilayer TiOx/IO ETL yielded an enhanced PCE of 15.1±0.6%, which is mainly ascribed to improved FF of 69.9±3.4%, together with slightly increased JSC of 20.8±0.7mA/cm2, as compared with the pristine single-layer one. | What is the value of PCE? | 7040 |
{
"text": [
"6.34%"
],
"answer_start": [
143
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.08.101 | In contrast, p-CuInS2/C showed a higher Jsc of 16.29 mA cm−2 and a higher η of 6.48%, which was slightly higher than that of the Pt electrode (6.34%). | What is the value of η? | 40493 |
{
"text": [
"18.30%"
],
"answer_start": [
392
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.01.016 | The passivated device yields a significant enhancement in the performance compared with that of the control device, which mainly originate from a markedly enhanced fill factor (FF) from 65.41% to 78.70%, as well as a mildly increased short circuit current (JSC) from 21.12mAcm−2 to 21.93mAcm−2 and open-circuit voltage (VOC) from 1.04V to 1.06V, which result in a PCE increase from 14.37% to 18.30%. | What is the value of PCE? | 2009 |
{
"text": [
"11.0%"
],
"answer_start": [
223
]
} | 10.1016/j.spmi.2017.07.009 | The device with sample S7.5 annealed under static N2 condition without N2 drying showed the open circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.95V, short circuit current (Jsc) of 18.1mAcm−2, fill factor (FF) of 64.2%, corresponding to PCE of 11.0%. | What is the value of PCE? | 1784 |
{
"text": [
"17.7%"
],
"answer_start": [
821
]
} | 10.1016/j.cclet.2016.11.009 | Compound BTT-3 shows perfect band alignment with the HOMO level of MAPbI3 perovskite, can be used as alternative to spiro-OMeTAD to reduce the cost ) showed performance (19.84%) under 100 mW cm−2 AM1.5G solar illumination ) and tris{N,N-bis(4-methoxyphenyl)-N-biphenyl}amine (OMeTPA-TPA) as HTL materials revealed PCEs of 13.63% and 12.31% for and the device based on FTO/mp-TiO2/MAPbI3/HTMs/Au and retained 11.64% performance for 500 h under outdoor conditions for OMeTPA-FA material Symmetrical, star shaped and planar and fused materials, tris{bis(4-methoxyphenylethenyl)-N-phenyl}amine (TPA-MeOPh) and highly stable tris{bis(4-methoxyphenylethenyl)-N-phenyl}amine quinolizino acridine (FA-MeOPh) (), end-caped with electron rich methoxy substituents which potentially lowered the cost and remarkably furnished PCE of 17.7% for KR131 Snaith et al. | What is the value of PCE? | 4241 |
{
"text": [
"[]"
],
"answer_start": [
245
]
} | 10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.10.011 | For instance, a large Voc of 1.43 V was obtained in the Au/BiFeO3/BaTiO3/Pt device and the PCE of the ITO/Bi2FeCrO6/Nb:SrTiO3 multilayer devices could be as high as 8.1%, which is comparable with those of some semiconductor photovoltaic devices []. | What is ITO? | 9515 |
{
"text": [
"Au"
],
"answer_start": [
128
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA06177F | Perovskite solar cells were fabricated by spin-coating spiro-OMeTAD as a hole-transport material (HTM) and by vacuum-depositing Au as a counter electrode. | What is counter electrode? | 19760 |
{
"text": [
"2.63%"
],
"answer_start": [
225
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2013.11.050 | The DSSC sensitized by TPTDYE 2 without DCA offered maximum energy conversion efficiency (η) of 6.85% with a Voc of 0.73V, a Jsc of 13.80mA/cm2 and an FF of 0.68, while the DSSC sensitized by TPTDYE 3 without DCA gave a η of 2.63% with a Voc of 0.65V, a Jsc of 5.95mA/cm2, and an FF of 0.68. | What is the value of η? | 57328 |
{
"text": [
"4.01%"
],
"answer_start": [
258
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.02.016 | The results indicated that the device composed of ZTO solid microspheres showed a short circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 7.14mAcm−2, an open circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.76V and a fill factor (FF) of 0.75, leading to an power conversion efficiency (η) of 4.01%. | What is the value of η? | 24416 |
{
"text": [
"2 h"
],
"answer_start": [
35
]
} | 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.11.008 | Increasing ultrasonication time to 2 h, MWCNTs become shorter and the aggregation is diminished. | What is the value of time? | 26616 |
{
"text": [
"8.14%"
],
"answer_start": [
96
]
} | 10.1039/C3CC42121J | In conjunction with the cobalt electrolyte, XS54 featuring the 4-HOP-DTP spacer yields a PCE of 8.14%, outperforming the analogous device constructed using XS57. | What is the value of PCE? | 69049 |
{
"text": [
"72.0%"
],
"answer_start": [
181
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.02.017 | The device based on the pristine HTM showed a PCE of 14.2% with a short-circuit current density (JSC) of 20.0mAcm−2, an open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.99V, and fill factor (FF) of 72.0% at forward scan, and a PCE of 14.7% with a JSC of 20.1mAcm−2, VOC of 0.99V, and FF of 74.0% at reverse scan under 1 sun illumination. | What is the value of FF? | 1853 |
{
"text": [
"69.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
125
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2014.09.019 | The DSSC with Ti:Nb(5:5)–TiO2/FTO exhibited a higher PCE of 10.37% [Jsc= 20.82 mA/cm2, Voc= 717 mV, and a fill factor (FF) = 69.5%] than the reference device with Ti:Nb(10:0)–TiO2/FTO, which showed a PCE of 7.90% (Jsc= 18.05 mA/cm2, Voc= 662 mV, and FF= 66.1%). | What is the value of FF? | 37940 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
33
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2009.06.014 | The incident light intensity was 100mWcm−2 calibrated with a standard Si solar cell. | What is the value of light intensity? | 35663 |
{
"text": [
"0.59 V"
],
"answer_start": [
197
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2011.12.014 | The impressive performance dye-sensitized solar cell based on PMBTZ exhibits a maximum incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) value of 65%, with a Jsc of 14.11 mA/cm2 and a Voc of 0.59 V. | What is the value of Voc? | 41961 |
{
"text": [
"0.9–1.1"
],
"answer_start": [
68
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA27211H | Both the photoanode and CE were inserted into a capillary (φinner = 0.9–1.1 mm) filled with an iodine electrolyte composed of 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide (BMII; 0.6 M), iodine (I2; 0.03 M), 4-tert-butylpyridine (TBP; 0.3 M), lithium perchlorate (LiClO4; 0.05 M), and guanidine thiocyanate (GuSCN; 0.05 M) in acetonitrile. | What is photoanode? | 67712 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
419
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.04.084 | The large size of DMPII results in a low mass transfer rate of DMPI+ ions in the electrolyte, which in turn causes a small JSC for its cell It is well known that I2 exists in the electrolyte with I− ions in the form of polyiodides such as I3– or I5– illustrates the photocurrent density–voltage curves of the DSSCs with 0.1M LiI, 0.6M DMPII, 0.5M TBP and different concentrations of I2 in the electrolytes, measured at 100mWcm−2 light intensity and in the dark; the corresponding photovoltaic parameters are presented in . | What is the value of light intensity? | 25680 |
{
"text": [
"570 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
145
]
} | 10.1039/C8NJ02658K | The lowest efficiency of the device with the acyl azide sensitizer DC108 arose due its poor photovoltaic parameters: Jsc (4.26 mA cm−2) and Voc (570 mV). | What is the value of Voc? | 70518 |
{
"text": [
"0.744 V"
],
"answer_start": [
286
]
} | 10.1016/j.molstruc.2015.04.012 | When two alkyl chains were localized at the β,β′-position of bithiophene to construct S-C1 and S-C6, the solar cell based on S-C1 produces a PCE of 7.08% (Jsc= 13.79 mA cm−2, Voc= 0.731 V, and FF = 0.703), and the solar cell based on S-C6 yields a PCE of 5.20% (Jsc= 9.89 mA cm−2, Voc= 0.744 V, and FF = 0.709). | What is the value of Voc? | 27826 |
{
"text": [
"7.69%"
],
"answer_start": [
49
]
} | 10.1039/C6CS00752J | The DSSC with the Pt/MWCNT CEs produced a PCE of 7.69%, while the device with Pt CE achieved a PCE of 6.31%. | What is the value of PCE? | 66730 |
{
"text": [
"17.67mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
59
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.10.025 | Under the same conditions, the GO/Yb (1:1) CE had a JSC of 17.67mA/cm2, VOC of 0.77V, FF of 0.42, and PCE of 5.69%, which was lower than that of the tested Pt CE. | What is the value of JSC? | 24016 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
65
]
} | 10.1016/j.jechem.2015.10.020 | shows the photocurrent density-photovoltage (J–V) curves for FTO/TiO2/CH3NH3PbI3/HTM/Au solar cells and related parameters are summarized in . | What is FTO? | 6395 |
{
"text": [
"gold"
],
"answer_start": [
86
]
} | 10.1039/C8SE00154E | The decrease in the JSC value was observed due to the damage to the HTM layer and the gold electrode. | What is electrode? | 15471 |
{
"text": [
"717mV"
],
"answer_start": [
73
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.12.018 | At last, the DSSC based on JY48 exhibited the highest PCE of 8.44% (Voc: 717mV; Jsc: 18.43mAcm−2; FF: 0.64), which is superior to that of YD2−o−C8 (PCE: 7.76%; Voc: 760mV; Jsc: 15.68mAcm−2; FF: 0.65) at the same conditions.The incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) spectra of devices based on dyes JY47−49 were measured and the IPCE curves are depicted in . | What is the value of Voc? | 31028 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
192
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA10234K | The intercepts with the real axis in the high frequency range represent the overall ohmic series resistance (Rs) of the symmetric cells, including the bulk resistance of the CE materials, the FTO substrate and the contact resistance. | What is substrate? | 65995 |
{
"text": [
"6.55%"
],
"answer_start": [
208
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2016.10.004 | Optimizing the mass ratio can lead to a higher Voc with minimum drop in Jsc.It should be noted that the value of η in Test K9 [DSSC with a TiO2 (P-25)/TiO2 (P-25) + 0.1 wt% Ru-TiO2+ Li0.01Ni0.99O electrode] (6.55%) was far higher than that in Test K1 [DSSC with a TiO2 (P-25) electrode] (3.61%). | What is the value of η? | 35445 |
{
"text": [
"14.35%"
],
"answer_start": [
44
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.163 | The device with 1.0cm2 area achieved PCE of 14.35% and HI of 0.019.Supplementary data to this article can be found online at | What is the value of PCE? | 6978 |
{
"text": [
"7.96%"
],
"answer_start": [
74
]
} | 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.01.106 | TNF cell with a thickness of ∼50 μm gave a conversion efficiency (PCE) of 7.96% with a short-current density (Jsc) of 15.76 mA cm−2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 790 mV, and a fill factor (FF) of 0.64. | What is the value of PCE? | 43863 |
{
"text": [
"6.5"
],
"answer_start": [
248
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.01.014 | Elemental analysis (C H N) was carried out on a VARIO-EL-III elemental analyzer.UV–Vis absorption spectra of the dyes in MeCN-DCM (3:1, v/v, where MeCN is acetonitrile, and DCM is dichloromethane; 1×10−5M) solutions and on the adsorbed TiO2 films (6.5μm) were measured with a Shimadzu UV-Lambda 950 spectrophotometer. | What is TiO2? | 27353 |
{
"text": [
"14.57%"
],
"answer_start": [
145
]
} | 10.1039/C7NR07933H | However, it is disappointing that the Voc and fill factor (FF) of the ISCs are reduced, so the MAPbI3/PBDTTT-E-T:IEICO ISCs obtain a PCE of only 14.57% (reverse scan). | What is the value of PCE? | 14008 |
{
"text": [
"16.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
64
]
} | 10.1039/C9TC01741K | The optimized PCE of the inverted structure in our study, i.e., 16.9%, was achieved by using FM (1:1), whereas in the previous study, the highest PCE (15.8%) was obtained using a C60 ETL. | What is the value of PCE? | 14776 |
{
"text": [
"4.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
74
]
} | 10.1039/C8DT00413G | In turn, device B exhibits VOC of 0.660 V, JSC of 8.9 mA cm−2, and PCE of 4.5%. | What is the value of PCE? | 67490 |
{
"text": [
"0.45%"
],
"answer_start": [
99
]
} | 10.1039/C0JM02532A | An optimum PVC device based on the blended polymerP1:PCBM = 1:1 (w/w) achieved the PCE value up to 0.45%, with Voc = 0.61 V, Jsc = 2.18 mA cm−2, and FF = 34.1% (under AM 1.5 G 100 mW cm−2), and those values are comparable with BHJ solar cells fabricated from ionic polythiophene and C60. | What is the value of PCE? | 76056 |
{
"text": [
"11.86 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
151
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.05.002 | The dye sensitized solar cell fabricated using dye D1 showed the higher incident photon to current efficiency of 54%, a short circuit current (Jsc) of 11.86 mA/cm2, an open circuit voltage of 0.64 V, and fill factor (FF) of 0.68, corresponding an overall power conversion efficiency of 5.16% which is higher than that for D2 based DSSCs (4.42%). | What is the value of Jsc? | 48688 |
{
"text": [
"2.83%"
],
"answer_start": [
119
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2014.10.029 | Solar cell sensitized with HJ1 exhibited a Jsc of 9.65 mA/cm2, a Voc of 0.67 V, and a FF of 44.33, resulting in a η of 2.83%, which is close to that of N719 (3.24%) under the same device fabrication and efficiency measurement procedures. | What is the value of η? | 38479 |
{
"text": [
"0.73 V"
],
"answer_start": [
111
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA09656H | When microsphere NiSe2/RGO was used as the counter electrode, the resultant photovoltaic parameters were Voc = 0.73 V, Jsc = 15.82 mA cm−2, FF = 0.61, and η = 6.94%. | What is the value of Voc? | 77315 |
{
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
43
]
} | 10.1016/j.arabjc.2018.04.017 | The light intensity was adjusted to 1 sun (100mW/cm2) with a silicon photodiode (model PEC-SI01, Peccell Technologies, Inc.). | What is the value of light intensity? | 52863 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
2
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA12206G | A TiO2 compact layer was prepared by spin-coating the dispersed TiO2 nanoparticle solution onto ITO at 5000 rpm for 40 s and dried at 150 °C for 30 min. | What is ITO? | 12926 |
{
"text": [
"0.035%"
],
"answer_start": [
534
]
} | 10.1016/j.poly.2017.12.015 | For the DSC sensitized with [Ru(bpy)2(H2)]−, the high Rrec leads to a high Ld which is consistent with the low JSC of the DSC (A comparison of the performances of three cyclometallated ruthenium(II) sensitizers in p-type DSCs has revealed that binding the dye to a NiO working electrode through a phosphonic acid anchoring domain leads to enhanced values of JSC and photoconversion efficiencies (3.24mAcm−2 and η=0.116% for the best performing DSC) with respect to a comparable dye bearing a carboxylic acid anchor (JSC=1.38mAcm−2, η=0.035%). | What is the value of η? | 32797 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
148
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2009.02.006 | We obtained a maximum solar energy to electricity conversion efficiency of 4.4% (Jsc=14.71mAcm−2, Voc=0.53V, ff=0.56) under AM 1.5 solar simulator (100mWcm−2) based on F1. | What is the value of solar? | 44086 |
{
"text": [
"621 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
135
]
} | 10.1039/B822190A | Under the same measuring conditions, the Ru dye N3-sensitized TiO2 showed an efficiency of 6.42% with a Jsc of 15.38 mA cm−2, a Voc of 621 mV, and a ff of 0.67. | What is the value of Voc? | 71979 |
{
"text": [
"3.39%"
],
"answer_start": [
267
]
} | 10.1016/j.jelechem.2015.09.028 | The highest photocurrent density (JSC) and η were achieved for the DSSC with the ZnO aggregates formed at the reaction time of 4 h on its photoanode, and the η of 4.42% represents a 30% enhancement with compared to that of the commercial ZnO nanoparticle-based cell (3.39%). | What is the value of η? | 23425 |
{
"text": [
"0.25cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
28
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.181 | The active area of cell was 0.25cm2.Carbon produced from organic precursor Bpy was characterized by different techniques like XRD, Raman spectroscopy, FEG-SEM, FEG-TEM, and Cyclic voltammetry (CV). | What is the value of active area? | 26521 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
94
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2009.02.006 | Maximum solar energy:electricity conversion efficiency was 4.4% under AM 1.5 solar simulator (100mWcm−2) for 2-cyano-3-(5-(7,12-diphenylbenzo[k]fluoranthen-3-yl)thiophen-2-yl)acrylic acid. | What is the value of solar? | 44083 |
{
"text": [
"3.71 mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
205
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.06.007 | In detail, at 20 nm the PCE increase is mainly ascribed to Voc (from 0.65 V to 0.79 V) and FF (from 55% to 66%) improvements, while at 68 nm the PCE increase is mainly contributed by Jsc improvement (from 3.71 mAcm−2 to 5.21 mAcm−2). | What is the value of Jsc? | 51619 |
{
"text": [
"14.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
167
]
} | 10.1039/C9TA01859J | These samples show limited quantum confinement, long carrier lifetime and fast carrier mobilities, resulting in PSCs with a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of up to 14.1%. | What is the value of PCE? | 15046 |
{
"text": [
"1.05 V"
],
"answer_start": [
54
]
} | 10.1039/C5NR06177F | The MAPbI3 cell could independently generate a VOC of 1.05 V, a JSC of 19.8 mA cm−2, a FF of 0.71 and a PCE of 14.8% before being mounted below the MAPbBr3 cell (dash in Fig. | What is the value of VOC? | 21179 |
{
"text": [
"9.34%"
],
"answer_start": [
84
]
} | 10.1039/C6CS00752J | The DSSC assembled with the CE by urea-assisted HD-EG achieved an impressive PCE of 9.34%, while the devices with the CEs prepared by EG reduction and thermal reduction produced PCEs of 8.66% and 7.99%, respectively.Compared to the bulk Pt, Pt nanoparticles have excellent characteristic properties like high surface area, high transmittance, low charge transfer resistance, high electrical conductivity and corrosion resistance, better than any other noble metals. | What is the value of PCE? | 66696 |
{
"text": [
"0.25 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
123
]
} | 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2011.11.064 | The photovoltaic properties of DSSCs were investigated by measuring the photocurrent density (J)-Voltage (V) curves in the 0.25 cm2 active area under a 450 W Xe lamp with an AM 1.5 G (Oriel® Sol3A™, 100 mWcm−2) illumination calibrated with a Si reference solar cell with a KG5 optical filter (VLSI).XRD patterns were obtained on the TiO2 films as a function of electron beam irradiation power from 0 to 100 kGy. | What is the value of active area? | 52434 |
{
"text": [
"0.25 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
72
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.02.154 | The cells were illuminated from the photoelectrode side (active area of 0.25 cm2) using a black metal mask with an aperture area of 0.152 cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 24437 |
{
"text": [
"0.62V"
],
"answer_start": [
75
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.112133 | The highest photocurrent efficiency (PCE) of 3.5%, JSC (7.80mA cm−2), VOC (0.62V) and FF (69.11%) was achieved by photosensitizer 10b incorporating spiro fluorene π-spacers moiety compared to PCE of 2.70%, JSC (6.45mA cm−2), VOC (0.57V) and FF (71.50%) for dye 7b with fluorenone π-spacers at the AM1.5G conditions and using a volatile redox electrolyte (iodide/triiodide). | What is the value of VOC? | 42177 |
{
"text": [
"0.15%"
],
"answer_start": [
191
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2016.04.027 | In comparison to MEH-PPV/ZnO-NA binary solar cells, the photovoltaic performance of MEH-PPV/ZC-NA ternary cells has been significantly improved with η being increased by 7-fold from original 0.15% to 1.23% at the optimized CdS shell thickness (i.e., L= 6 nm) TiO2/CuInS2-core/shell nanoarrays (TCIS-NAs) were synthesized by using TiO2-NA as template (c) were fabricated by infiltrating MEH-PPV into TCIS-NA. | What is the value of η? | 39815 |
{
"text": [
"2.4%"
],
"answer_start": [
71
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.09.039 | The POZ-1 and POZ-2 cells display power conversion efficiencies (η) of 2.4% and 6.5% respectively. | What is the value of η? | 50806 |
{
"text": [
"Au"
],
"answer_start": [
119
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA00739B | Layers of spiro-OMeTAD with bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide were spin coated in N2 and then oxygen doped before the Au electrode was thermally evaporated to 80 nm thickness.Module substrates were patterned by laser scribing glass/ITO glass sheets from Colorado Concepts (sheet resistance = 20 Ω □−1). | What is ITO? | 14236 |
{
"text": [
"13.75%"
],
"answer_start": [
69
]
} | 10.1039/C9TC02362C | The PCE of CsPbI2.4Br0.6-TBAB based PSCs is increased to 15.21% from 13.75%. | What is the value of PCE? | 19745 |
{
"text": [
"0.2cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
126
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.236 | When the doping-ration x was 0.25, the device exhibited the best performance with the efficiency of 9.99% with active area of 0.2cm2 under the irradiation of 100mW/cm2 air mass 1.5 global (AM1.5G) sunlight. | What is the value of active area? | 675 |
{
"text": [
"786 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
91
]
} | 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.07.001 | Of particular note is that the Voc of the cell FTO/ZnO+TiO2/MP has rised up to 817 mV from 786 mV which is the Voc value of the cell FTO/TiO2/MP after introducing the ZnO compact films as a bottom compact layer on the FTO. | What is the value of Voc? | 37688 |
{
"text": [
"0.09 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
124
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA04695E | Finally, the gold electrode (80 nm) was deposited as the back contact through thermal evaporation.The devices (active area: 0.09 cm2) were illuminated under 100 mW cm−2 by using a 150 W Class AAA solar simulator (XES-40S1, SAN-EI) with an AM 1.5G filter. | What is the value of active area? | 17963 |
{
"text": [
"16–18"
],
"answer_start": [
21
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2013.11.072 | A thin film of TiO2 (16–18μm thick) was coated on a 0.25cm2 FTO glass substrate, while the thickness was measured by Veeco Dektak 150. | What is TiO2? | 26192 |
{
"text": [
"2.85%"
],
"answer_start": [
62
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.251 | The cell with Ni-Mo-S@NG showed the highest η of the cells of 2.85%; the other cells showed lower η values of 2.41%, 2.16%, and 2.62% for Pt, MoS2@NG, and Cu-Mo-S@NG, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 29335 |
{
"text": [
"17.50%"
],
"answer_start": [
47
]
} | 10.1039/C9TA03176F | The TiO2 based reference device shows a PCE of 17.50% with a Voc of 1.06 V, a Jsc of 22.24 mA cm−2 and a FF of 0.74. | What is the value of PCE? | 19206 |
{
"text": [
"0.42%"
],
"answer_start": [
151
]
} | 10.1039/C6TC03621J | BHJ solar cells were fabricated by using P3HT as the donor and 70–75 as the acceptor (Table 2), among which the 72-based one showed the highest PCE of 0.42%.In a short summary, the study of QA-based electron acceptors opens a new path for the application of QAs. | What is the value of PCE? | 76514 |
{
"text": [
"7.33%"
],
"answer_start": [
61
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.09.001 | The TLEP-1 and TLEP-2 sensitized cells gave a η of 6.44% and 7.33% (Jsc=12.61 and 14.87mAcm−2, Voc=816 and 777mV, FF=0.63 and 0.63, respectively) under standard global AM 1.5G one sun illumination (100mWcm−2). | What is the value of η? | 32096 |
{
"text": [
"quasi-solid"
],
"answer_start": [
4
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.132 | The quasi-solid-state gel electrolyte was prepared as follows: 12% (wt%) of poly(methyl methacrylate-co-vinyl acetate) and the liquid electrolyte were mixed in 3-methoxypropionitrile, heated at 60–70°C for 1h, then cooled and repeated several times, until all solids dissolved and a clear gel appeared.Supplementary data to this article can be found online at | What is electrolyte? | 56530 |
{
"text": [
"FeSe2"
],
"answer_start": [
134
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.256 | The DSSC based on Ni0.5Fe0.5Se2 CE yielded a higher Jsc (15.03mA·cm−2) and FF (0.70) than those of NiSe2 (Jsc=12.88mA·cm−2, FF=0.67), FeSe2 (Jsc=10.09mA·cm−2, FF=0.62) and even Pt CEs (Jsc=13.82mA·cm−2, FF=0.68). | What is CEs? | 53653 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
140
]
} | 10.1016/j.cap.2018.10.020 | The simulated sunlight is produced by XEF-300 solar simulator and the light intensity is calibrated to give a standard AM 1.5 light source (100mWcm−2). | What is the value of solar? | 3374 |
{
"text": [
"7.88%"
],
"answer_start": [
37
]
} | 10.1039/C6CS00752J | The DSSC with GNB CE showed a PCE of 7.88%, which was close to that of the device with Pt CE (PCE = 8.38%), while GNF-based and GNS-based DSSCs showed PCEs of 3.60% and 2.99%, respectively.The porous expanded graphite (EG) obtained from graphite has a higher specific surface area and better conductivity. | What is the value of PCE? | 66573 |
{
"text": [
"51.2%"
],
"answer_start": [
59
]
} | 10.1039/C2CE25356A | However, the filling factor (FF) is improved from 42.0% to 51.2%. | What is the value of FF? | 62926 |
{
"text": [
"9.90±0.93%"
],
"answer_start": [
223
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.11.005 | Although the solubility of ZnChl-4 esterified with a phytyl group in nonpolar solvents is greatly improved to form a smooth film surface through a spin-coating process, the corresponding PSCs give the lowest average PCE of 9.90±0.93% among these Chl derivatives. | What is the value of PCE? | 6029 |
{
"text": [
"1.02 V"
],
"answer_start": [
62
]
} | 10.1039/C5EE02194D | Therefore, the device with the ZnO/PCBM EEL had a higher Voc (1.02 V) than a device with a ZnO-only EEL (0.78 V) (Fig. | What is the value of Voc? | 20007 |
{
"text": [
"18.09mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
59
]
} | 10.1016/j.mtchem.2016.12.003 | The reverse scan exhibits a PCE 9.85% with VOC=0.956V, JSC=18.09mAcm−2 and FF=0.57 (). | What is the value of JSC? | 7951 |
{
"text": [
"16.0"
],
"answer_start": [
226
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2005.04.008 | A plausible interaction between semiaquaric acids and semi conductors is discussed in our paper The IPCE value increased in the following order of N-butyl heteroaromatic derivatives: indolium (15b, 19.9%) > benzoindolium (16, 16.0) > benzothiazolium (17, 5.6) > qunolinium (18, 2.7). | What is IPCE? | 57571 |
{
"text": [
"15–20"
],
"answer_start": [
82
]
} | 10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.054 | It can also be observed that the average grain size of TiO2 in sintered fibers is 15–20nm similar in size to conventional nanoparticle-based DSCs Calcined samples of electrospun TiO2 nanofibers were subjected to X-ray diffraction analysis. | What is TiO2? | 50458 |
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
119
]
} | 10.1016/j.jechem.2016.07.002 | Photocurrent-voltage performance of the DSCs was conducted with solar simulator (94032A, Newport, US) under AM 1.5 and 100 mW/cm2.For some specific reactions, we need to analyze the reaction process and ensure the rate-determining steps. | What is the value of solar? | 57674 |
{
"text": [
"6.79%"
],
"answer_start": [
238
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.086 | Of them, the FeTa2O6/SC, CoTa2O6/SC, and CuTa10O26/SC CEs catalysts exhibited excellent electrocatalytic activities and electrocatalytic stability for I3− reduction, thus resulted in comparable power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 6.85%, 6.79%, and 6.53% to Pt-based CE (6.34%) in DSSCs. | What is the value of PCE? | 43693 |
{
"text": [
"1.04 V"
],
"answer_start": [
111
]
} | 10.1039/C4MH00236A | The device based on Fused-F achieved a high PCE of 12.8% under the illumination of 98.8 mW cm−2, with a Voc of 1.04 V, Jsc of 17.9 mA cm−2, and FF of 0.68 without any additives.As spiro-OMeTAD is the model material in small molecule HTMs, P3HT is the model material in polymer HTMs. | What is the value of Voc? | 13246 |
{
"text": [
"0.25 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
290
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.01.009 | An electrolyte solution was prepared by dissolving tetrapropylammonium iodide (0.46 mol dm−3) and iodine (0.06 mol dm−3) in a mixed solvent of ethylene carbonate (80 vol.%) and acetonitrile (20 vol.%).Photocurrents (I) and photovoltages (V) of the DSCs were measured with an active area of 0.25 cm2 using simulated sunlight at AM-1.5. | What is the value of active area? | 30428 |
{
"text": [
"1.10 mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
102
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.07.013 | After 15min of O2 plasma treatment ZnO based DSSCs exhibited short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) 1.10 mAcm−2, open-circuit voltage (Voc), 0.42V and fill factor (FF) 0.43 and enhanced power conversion efficiency of 0.76%.Dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) are widely studied in research institutes and photovoltaic laboratories as an alternative to conventional silicon and thin film solar cells Low temperature oxygen plasma treatment is employed as a milder method for removal of organic components from bulk hybrids With increase in oxygen plasma exposure to ZnO photoanode, there is increase in the O-Zn bonding by filling up of near surface oxygen vacancies, which are considered to be the main contributors to the shallow electron donor states In the present study, we report the effect of oxygen (O2) generated in ECR plasma treatment to ZnO films before and after dye adsorption. | What is the value of Jsc? | 49061 |
{
"text": [
"72.4%"
],
"answer_start": [
162
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.05.004 | It is interesting to note that, when using F4TCNQ, the PCE of the device can be dramatically increased to 11.52%, with a VOC of 0.909V, Jsc of 17.50mAcm−2, FF of 72.4%. | What is the value of FF? | 11617 |
{
"text": [
"1.00 V"
],
"answer_start": [
37
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA07972E | With a JSC of 19.9 mA cm−2, a VOC of 1.00 V, a FF of 0.63 and a PCE of 12.6%, the spin-cast reference device proves to be a highly efficient planar device with MAPBI3 perovskite. | What is the value of VOC? | 15776 |
{
"text": [
"16.3 mA"
],
"answer_start": [
122
]
} | 10.1039/B905103A | The short-circuit photocurrents (Isc) and power-conversion efficiencies (η) for JF-1 and JF-2 were 12.9 mA cm−2, 6.9% and 16.3 mA cm−2, 8.3%, respectively. | What is the value of Isc? | 61208 |
{
"text": [
"12.37 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
105
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2012.02.077 | Notably, the DSSC sensitized with TT gave higher IPCE response and better photovoltaic performances (Jsc=12.37 mA/cm2, Voc=0.72 V, and ff=0.58) than others. | What is the value of Jsc? | 54642 |
{
"text": [
"23.30"
],
"answer_start": [
94
]
} | 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00912 | This improves perovskite crystallization, leading to efficient charge transport and high JSC (23.30 mA/cm2). | What is ? | 7823 |
{
"text": [
"3.66mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
168
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.07.005 | The performance statistics are tabulated in ) PTCE1 and PTRE1 exhibited power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 1.76% (Jsc=4.51mAcm−2, Voc=584mV, FF=0.568) and 1.18% (Jsc=3.66mAcm−2, Voc=520mV, FF=0.530). | What is the value of Jsc? | 38681 |
{
"text": [
"12.31%"
],
"answer_start": [
125
]
} | 10.1039/C4MH00236A | Devices comprising FTO/bl-TiO2/mp-TiO2/MAPbI3/OMeTPA-TPA/Au and FTO/bl-TiO2/mp-TiO2/MAPbI3/OMeTPA-FA/Au demonstrated PCEs of 12.31% and 13.63% using three dopants composed of 4-tert-butylpyridine (TBP), bis(trifluoromethane)sulfonimide lithium salt (LiTFSI), and tris(2-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-4-tert-butylpyridine)cobalt(III) tris(bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide) (FK209) into the HTMs. | What is the value of PCE? | 13419 |
{
"text": [
"0.54 V"
],
"answer_start": [
34
]
} | 10.1039/C4FD00155A | However, both Voc and FF are low, 0.54 V and 0.27, respectively, implying the serious recombination at the exposed FTO glass/nanocarbon and/or the rutile TiO2/nanocarbon interfaces. | What is the value of Voc? | 16329 |
{
"text": [
"633.84 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
262
]
} | 10.1039/C4NJ02186J | Under the same conditions, the DSSCs for WH-C4 and WH-C5 with the incorporation of carbazole and triphenylamine as additional donor at the meso-position opposite to the anchoring benzoic acid group showed Jsc values of 10.07 and 11.43 mA cm−2, Voc of 609.81 and 633.84 mV, and FF of 0.72 and 0.69, corresponding to η of 4.40% and 5.00%, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 77026 |
{
"text": [
"0.71 V"
],
"answer_start": [
195
]
} | 10.1016/j.saa.2015.09.015 | The DSSC device based on P2 which contains benzodithiophene derivative as donor and Cd(II) as coordination ion, exhibited the highest power conversion efficiency of 2.43% (Jsc= 4.95 mA/cm2, Voc= 0.71 V, FF = 69.3%) under AM 1.5 G solar irradiation. | What is the value of Voc? | 47335 |
{
"text": [
"4.54%"
],
"answer_start": [
166
]
} | 10.1039/C4CP00298A | Using the substrate with lower energy loss between the light absorber and contact material, we remarkably increased the VOC from 0.50 to 0.92 V, with PCE enhanced to 4.54%.The precursor solution of methyl ammonium iodide (CH3NH3I) and lead iodide (PbI2) was prepared as reported elsewhere.The two indium-tin-oxide (ITO) substrates are glass/ITO from RITEK Corp (15 Ω □−1, denoted as the ITO-1) and the flexible polyethylene terephthalate (PET)/ITO from Optical Filters Ltd (15 Ω □−1, denoted as the ITO-2). | What is the value of PCE? | 12729 |
{
"text": [
"19.03mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
37
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.03.079 | As shown in d, a steady-state Jsc of 19.03mAcm−2 can be obtained, corresponding to a stable PCE of 16.55%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 11278 |
{
"text": [
"3.47%"
],
"answer_start": [
349
]
} | 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.05.001 | Among the DSSCs with CE containing different allotropes of carbon, the cell with GN-CE shows the best performance with an η of 4.58%, an open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.62 V, a fill factor (FF) of 0.53, and a short-circuit current density (JSC) of 13.93 mA cm−2; this η is far higher, compared to those of the cells with CB-CE (2.72%) and MWCNT-CE (3.47%). | What is the value of η? | 39525 |
{
"text": [
"Gold"
],
"answer_start": [
0
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA10727C | Gold was deposited as the top electrode. | What is electrode? | 15975 |
{
"text": [
"64.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
97
]
} | 10.1039/C5NJ00216H | The TiO2 NW–NP/SVL-30 min-based DSSC exhibits Voc, Jsc and FF values of 644 mV, 9.79 mA cm−2 and 64.5%, respectively, along with the best overall conversion efficiency of 4.07%, which is about 3.5 times higher than that of the TiO2 NW device with a thickness of 1.6 μm. | What is the value of FF? | 62300 |
{
"text": [
"79.0%"
],
"answer_start": [
93
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.02.014 | The device based on PCBM(GD)/ZnO(GD) exhibited a Voc of 1.05V, a Jsc of 24.06mA/cm2, a FF of 79.0% and a corresponding PCE of 20.00% (average PCE of 19.60%). | What is the value of FF? | 2034 |
{
"text": [
"77.6%"
],
"answer_start": [
77
]
} | 10.1039/C8RA03993C | Interestingly, devices with PCBM/TiOx/Al interface show improved FF of about 77.6% (reverse), PCE of ∼12.5% (reverse) and reduced Rs (10 Ω) compared to PCBM/Al interface based devices, which exhibit FF of about 61.2% (reverse), PCE of ∼9.7% (reverse) and about 12-fold higher Rs value of more than 130 Ω. | What is the value of FF? | 18243 |
{
"text": [
"20.0mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
189
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.04.059 | The DSSC devices based on the An101 and An102 dyes achieve excellent PCEs of 8.0% and 9.5% with TiO2 film area of 0.16cm2 under the same fabrication conditions, with Jsc values of 15.1 and 20.0mAcm−2, Voc values of 784 and 690mV, and FF values of 67.2% and 68.7%, respectively. | What is the value of Jsc? | 24965 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.