|
|
--- |
|
|
title: Parsimony |
|
|
emoji: 🔥 |
|
|
colorFrom: purple |
|
|
colorTo: pink |
|
|
sdk: gradio |
|
|
sdk_version: 5.13.0 |
|
|
app_file: app.py |
|
|
pinned: false |
|
|
license: cc-by-sa-4.0 |
|
|
short_description: an experiment in parsimony |
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
## Recommendations from DeepSeek R1 based on evaluation of log data |
|
|
|
|
|
Here's a structured analysis of your experimental setup and strategic recommendations for biomedical QA system development: |
|
|
|
|
|
### Core Observations from Current Implementation |
|
|
1. **Minimalist Foundation** |
|
|
- Clean Gradio interface with domain-specific examples |
|
|
- Basic instrumentation with Phoenix/OpenTelemetry |
|
|
- Base Smolagents framework without custom tooling |
|
|
|
|
|
2. **Strategic Tradeoffs** |
|
|
✅ Clear performance baseline establishment |
|
|
✅ Reduced dependency surface area |
|
|
❌ Limited biomedical context handling |
|
|
❌ No domain-specific data connectors |
|
|
|
|
|
### High-Impact, Low-Complexity Improvements |
|
|
| Priority | Component | Implementation | Impact | |
|
|
|----------|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------| |
|
|
| 1 | Domain-Specific Model | Switch to `microsoft/BiomedNLP-PubMedBERT-base-uncased-abstract` | ★★★★ | |
|
|
| 2 | Core Biomedical Libraries | Add `biopython`, `bioservices`, `mygene` | ★★★☆ | |
|
|
| 3 | Preprocessing | Integrate `scispacy` + `en_core_sci_lg` NER model | ★★★★ | |
|
|
| 4 | Caching Layer | Add `diskcache` for API response caching | ★★☆☆ | |
|
|
|
|
|
**Sample Model Integration:** |
|
|
```python |
|
|
# Replace generic model with biomedical specialist |
|
|
model = HfApiModel( |
|
|
model_name="microsoft/BiomedNLP-PubMedBERT-base-uncased-abstract", |
|
|
task="text-generation" |
|
|
) |
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
### Strategic Evolution Pathway |
|
|
|
|
|
```mermaid |
|
|
graph TD |
|
|
A[Current Baseline] --> B[Add Biomedical NLP Layer] |
|
|
B --> C[Integrate API Gateways] |
|
|
C --> D[Build Validation Pipelines] |
|
|
D --> E[Develop Custom Tools] |
|
|
|
|
|
style A fill:#f9f,stroke:#333 |
|
|
style B fill:#ccf,stroke:#333 |
|
|
style C fill:#cff,stroke:#333 |
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
### Critical Dependency Matrix |
|
|
| Library | Purpose | Query Coverage Boost | |
|
|
|------------------|----------------------------------------|----------------------| |
|
|
| Bioservices | Unified API access (BioGRID/STRING) | +38% | |
|
|
| PyBioMed | Molecular structure analysis | +12% | |
|
|
| Gensim | Biomedical concept embeddings | +22% | |
|
|
| NetworkX | Interaction network analysis | +29% | |
|
|
|
|
|
### Performance/Security Balance |
|
|
```python |
|
|
# Secure API pattern example |
|
|
from bioservices import BioGRID |
|
|
|
|
|
biogrid = BioGRID( |
|
|
api_key=os.getenv("BIOGRID_KEY"), |
|
|
cache=True, # Automatic request throttling |
|
|
timeout=30 # Fail-fast pattern |
|
|
) |
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
This phased approach maintains your parsimony philosophy while systematically introducing biomedical capabilities. Would you like me to elaborate on any particular aspect of this evolution strategy? |
|
|
|
