|
--- |
|
license: llama3.1 |
|
datasets: |
|
- georgeck/hacker-news-discussion-summarization-large |
|
language: |
|
- en |
|
base_model: |
|
- meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct |
|
tags: |
|
- summarization |
|
- hacker-news |
|
- hn-companion |
|
library_name: transformers |
|
pipeline_tag: text-generation |
|
--- |
|
# Model Card for Hacker-News-Comments-Summarization-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct |
|
|
|
This model specializes in generating concise, informative summaries of Hacker News discussion threads. |
|
It analyzes hierarchical comment structures to extract key themes, insights, and perspectives while prioritizing high-quality content based on community engagement. |
|
|
|
## Model Details |
|
|
|
### Model Description |
|
|
|
The `Hacker-News-Comments-Summarization-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct` is a fine-tuned version of `Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct`, optimized for summarizing structured discussions from Hacker News. |
|
It processes hierarchical comment threads to identify main themes, significant viewpoints, and high-quality contributions, organizing them into a structured summary format that highlights community consensus and notable perspectives. |
|
|
|
- **Developed by:** George Chiramattel & Ann Catherine Jose |
|
- **Model type:** Fine-tuned Large Language Model (Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct) |
|
- **Language(s):** English |
|
- **License:** llama3.1 |
|
- **Finetuned from model:** Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct |
|
|
|
### Model Sources |
|
|
|
- **Repository:** https://huggingface.co/georgeck/Hacker-News-Comments-Summarization-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct |
|
- **Dataset Repository:** https://huggingface.co/datasets/georgeck/hacker-news-discussion-summarization-large |
|
|
|
## Uses |
|
|
|
### Direct Use |
|
|
|
This model is designed to generate structured summaries of Hacker News discussion threads. Given a thread with hierarchical comments, it produces a well-organized summary with: |
|
|
|
1. An overview of the discussion |
|
2. Main themes and key insights |
|
3. Detailed theme breakdowns with notable quotes |
|
4. Key perspectives including contrasting viewpoints |
|
5. Notable side discussions |
|
|
|
The model is particularly useful for: |
|
- Helping users quickly understand the key points of lengthy discussion threads |
|
- Identifying community consensus on technical topics |
|
- Surfacing expert explanations and valuable insights |
|
- Highlighting diverse perspectives on topics |
|
|
|
### Downstream Use |
|
|
|
This model was created for the [Hacker News Companion](https://github.com/levelup-apps/hn-enhancer) project. |
|
|
|
|
|
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations |
|
|
|
- **Community Bias:** The model may inherit biases present in the Hacker News community, which tends to skew toward certain demographics and perspectives in tech. |
|
- **Content Prioritization:** The scoring system prioritizes comments with high engagement, which may not always correlate with factual accuracy or diverse representation. |
|
- **Technical Limitations:** The model's performance may degrade with extremely long threads or discussions with unusual structures. |
|
- **Limited Context:** The model focuses on the discussion itself and may lack broader context about the topics being discussed. |
|
- **Attribution Challenges:** The model attempts to properly attribute quotes, but may occasionally misattribute or improperly format references. |
|
- **Content Filtering:** While the model attempts to filter out low-quality or heavily downvoted content, it may not catch all problematic content. |
|
|
|
### Recommendations |
|
|
|
- Users should be aware that the summaries reflect community engagement patterns on Hacker News, which may include inherent biases. |
|
- For critical decision-making, users should verify important information from the original source threads. |
|
- Review the original discussion when the summary highlights conflicting perspectives to ensure fair representation. |
|
- When repurposing summaries, maintain proper attribution to both the model and the original commenters. |
|
|
|
## How to Get Started with the Model |
|
|
|
```python |
|
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer |
|
|
|
# Load model and tokenizer |
|
model_name = "georgeck/Hacker-News-Comments-Summarization-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct" |
|
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name) |
|
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_name) |
|
|
|
# Format input with the expected structure |
|
post_title = "Your Hacker News post title here" |
|
comments = """ |
|
[1] (score: 800) <replies: 2> {downvotes: 0} user1: This is a top-level comment |
|
[1.1] (score: 600) <replies: 1> {downvotes: 0} user2: This is a reply to the first comment |
|
[1.1.1] (score: 400) <replies: 0> {downvotes: 0} user3: This is a reply to the reply |
|
[2] (score: 700) <replies: 0> {downvotes: 0} user4: This is another top-level comment |
|
""" |
|
|
|
prompt = f"""You are HackerNewsCompanion, an AI assistant specialized in summarizing Hacker News discussions. |
|
Your task is to provide concise, meaningful summaries that capture the essence of the discussion while prioritizing high quality content. |
|
Focus on high-scoring and highly-replied comments, while deprioritizing downvoted comments (EXCLUDE comments with more than 4 downvotes), |
|
to identify main themes and key insights. |
|
Summarize in markdown format with these sections: Overview, Main Themes & Key Insights, [Theme Titles], Significant Viewpoints, Notable Side Discussions. |
|
In 'Main Themes', use bullet points. When quoting comments, include the hierarchy path and attribute the author, example '[1.2] (user1).'`; |
|
|
|
Provide a concise and insightful summary of the following Hacker News discussion, as per the guidelines you've been given. |
|
The goal is to help someone quickly grasp the main discussion points and key perspectives without reading all comments. |
|
Please focus on extracting the main themes, significant viewpoints, and high-quality contributions. |
|
The post title and comments are separated by three dashed lines: |
|
--- |
|
Post Title: |
|
{post_title} |
|
--- |
|
Comments: |
|
{comments} |
|
--- |
|
""" |
|
|
|
inputs = tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt") |
|
outputs = model.generate(inputs.input_ids, max_length=1024) |
|
summary = tokenizer.decode(outputs[0], skip_special_tokens=True) |
|
print(summary) |
|
``` |
|
|
|
## Training Details |
|
|
|
### Training Data |
|
|
|
This model was fine-tuned on the [georgeck/hacker-news-discussion-summarization-large](https://huggingface.co/datasets/georgeck/hacker-news-discussion-summarization-large) dataset, which contains 14,531 records of Hacker News front-page stories and their associated discussion threads. |
|
|
|
The dataset includes: |
|
- 6,300 training examples |
|
- 700 test examples |
|
- Structured representations of hierarchical comment threads |
|
- Normalized scoring system that represents comment importance |
|
- Comprehensive metadata about posts and comments |
|
|
|
Each example includes a post title, and a structured representation of the comment thread with information about comment scores, reply counts, and downvotes. |
|
|
|
### Training Procedure |
|
|
|
#### Preprocessing |
|
|
|
- The hierarchical comment structure was preserved using a standardized format |
|
- A normalized scoring system (1-1000) was applied to represent each comment's relative importance |
|
- Comments were organized to maintain their hierarchical relationships |
|
|
|
The training was done by using [OpenPipe](https://openpipe.ai/) infrastructure. |
|
|
|
## Evaluation |
|
|
|
### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics |
|
|
|
#### Testing Data |
|
|
|
The model was evaluated on the test split of the georgeck/hacker-news-discussion-summarization-large dataset. |
|
|
|
#### Factors |
|
|
|
Evaluation considered: |
|
- Discussions of varying lengths and complexities |
|
- Threads with differing numbers of comment hierarchies |
|
- Discussions across various technical domains common on Hacker News |
|
- Threads with different levels of controversy (measured by comment downvotes) |
|
|
|
|
|
## Technical Specifications |
|
|
|
### Model Architecture and Objective |
|
|
|
This model is based on Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, a causal language model. |
|
The primary training objective was to generate structured summaries of hierarchical discussion threads that capture the most important themes, perspectives, and insights while maintaining proper attribution. |
|
|
|
The model was trained to specifically understand and process the hierarchical structure of Hacker News comments, including their scoring system, reply counts, and downvote information to appropriately weight content importance. |
|
|
|
|
|
## Citation |
|
|
|
**BibTeX:** |
|
|
|
``` |
|
@misc{georgeck2025HackerNewsSummarization, |
|
author = {George Chiramattel, Ann Catherine Jose}, |
|
title = {Hacker-News-Comments-Summarization-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct}, |
|
year = {2025}, |
|
publisher = {Hugging Face}, |
|
journal = {Hugging Face Hub}, |
|
howpublished = {https://huggingface.co/georgeck/Hacker-News-Comments-Summarization-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct}, |
|
} |
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
## Glossary |
|
|
|
- **Hierarchy Path:** Notation (e.g., [1.2.1]) that shows a comment's position in the discussion tree. A single number indicates a top-level comment, while additional numbers represent deeper levels in the reply chain. |
|
- **Score:** A normalized value between 1-1000 representing a comment's relative importance based on community engagement. |
|
- **Downvotes:** Number of negative votes a comment received, used to filter out low-quality content. |
|
- **Thread:** A chain of replies stemming from a single top-level comment. |
|
- **Theme:** A recurring topic or perspective identified across multiple comments. |
|
|
|
## Model Card Authors |
|
|
|
[George Chiramattel, Ann Catherine Jose] |