Datasets:
timotheeplanes
/
doping

Dataset card Data Studio Files Community
1
text
stringlengths
1
17.8k
In such event , that organization or body may be suspend ed for a period of up to four (4) years.
12.2.3 More than one Athlete or other Person affiliated with that organization or body commits an anti -doping rule violation during an International Event.
In such event, that organization or body may be fined in an amount up to $10,000U.S.
Dollars .
12.2.4 That organization or body has failed to m ake diligent efforts to keep World Lacrosse informed about an Athlete's whereabouts after receiving a request for that information from World Lacrosse .
In such event, that organization or body may be fined in an amount up to $5,000U.S.
Dollars , per Athlete , in addition to reimbursement of all the World Lacrosse costs incurred in Testing that organization’s or body’s Athletes .
12.3 Withhold some or all funding or other financial and non-financial support to that organization or body .
WADA 2021 IF Model Rules ( December 2019) Page 46 of 69 12.4 Oblige that organization or body to reimburse World Lacrosse for all costs (including but not limited to laboratory fees, hearing expenses and travel) related to a violation of these Anti-Doping Rules committed by an Athlete or other Person affiliated with that organization or body .
ARTICLE 13 RESULTS MANAGEMENT : APPEAL S 61 13.1 Decisions Subject to Appeal Decisions made under the Code or these Anti -Doping Rules may be appealed as set forth below in Article s 13.2 through 13.7 or as otherwise provided in these Anti -Doping Rules, the Code or the International Standards .
Such decisions shall remain in effect while under appeal unless the appellate body orders otherwise.
13.1.1 Scope of Review Not Limited The scope of review on appeal includes all issues relevant to the matter and is expressly not limited to the issues or scope of review before the initial decision maker.
Any party to the appeal may submit evidence, legal arguments and claims that were not rai sed in the first instance hearing so long as they arise from the same cause of action or same general facts or circumstances raised or addressed in the first instance hearing.62 13.1.2 CAS Shall Not Defer to the Findings Being Appealed In making its decision, CAS shall not give deference to the discretion exercised by the body whose decision is being appealed.63 13.1.3 WADA Not Required to Exhaust Internal Remedies Where WADA has a right to appeal under Article 13 and no other party h as appealed a final decision within World Lacrosse ’s process, WADA may appeal such decision directly to CAS without having to exhaust other remedies in World Lacrosse ’s process.64 13.2 Appeals from Decisions Regarding Anti -Doping Rule Violations, Consequences , Provisional Suspensions, Implementation of Decisions and Authority A decision that an anti -doping rule violation was committed, a decision imposing Consequences or not imposing Consequences for an anti -doping rule violation, or a decision that no anti -doping rule 61 [Comment to Article 13: The object of the Code is to have anti -doping matters resolved through fair and transparent internal processes with a final appeal.
Anti -doping decisions by Anti -Doping O rganizations are made transparent in Article 14.
Specified Persons and organizations, including WADA, are then given the opportunity to appeal those decisions.
Note that the definition of interested Persons and organizations with a right to appeal under Ar ticle 13 does not include Athletes, or their National Governing Bodies , who might benefit from having another competitor Disqualified.]
62 [Comment to Article 13.1.1: The revised language is not intended to make a substantive change to the 2015 Code, but rather for clarification.
For example, where an Athlete was charged in the first instance hearing only with Tampering but the same condu ct could also constitute Complicity, an appealing party could pursue both Tampering and Complicity charges against t he Athlete in the appeal.]
63 [Comment to Article 13.1.2: CAS proceedings are de novo.
Prior proceedings do not limit the evidence or carry weight in the hearing before CAS.]
64 [Comment to Article 13.1.3: Where a decision has been rendered before the fi nal stage of World Lacrosse ’s process (for example, a first hearing) and no party elects to appeal that decision to the next level of World Lacrosse ’s process (e.g., the Managing Board), then WADA may bypass the remaining steps in World Lacrosse ’s internal process and appeal directly to CAS.]
WADA 2021 IF Model Rules ( December 2019) Page 47 of 69 violation was committed; a decision that an anti -doping rule violation proceeding cannot go forward for procedural reasons (including, for example, prescription); a decision by WADA not to grant an exception to the s ix (6) months notice requirement for a retired Athlete to return to competition under Article 5.
6.1; a decision by WADA assigning Results Management under Article 7.1 of the Code ; a decision by World Lacrosse not to bring forward an Adverse Analytical Finding or an Atypical Finding as an anti -doping rule violation, or a decision not to go forward with an anti -doping rule violation after an investigation in accordance with the International Standard for Results Management ; a decision to impose, or lift, a Provisional Suspension as a result of a Provisional Hearing ; World Lacrosse ’s failure to comply with Article 7.4; a decision that World Lacrosse lacks authority to rule on an alleged anti -doping rule violation o r its Consequences ; a decision to suspend, or not suspend, Consequences or to reinstate, or not reinstate, Consequences under Article 10.7.1; failure to comply with Articles 7.1.4 and 7.1.5 of the Code ; failure to comply with Article 10.8.1; a decision und er Article 10.14.3; a decision by World Lacrosse not to implement another Anti-Doping Organization’s decision under Article 15; and a decision under Article 27.3 of the Code may be appealed exclusively as provided in this Article 13.2.
13.2.1 Appeals Involving International -Level Athletes or International Events In cases arising from participation in an International Event or in cases involving International -Level Athlet es, the decision may be appealed exclusively to CAS.65 13.2.2 Appeals Involving Other Athletes or Other Persons In cases where Article 13.2.1 is not applicable, the decision may be appealed to an appellate body, in accordance with rules adopted by the National Anti -Doping Organization having authority over the Athlete or other Person .
The rules for such appeal sha ll respect the following principles: a timely hearing; a fair , impartial , Operationally Independent and Institutionally Independent hearing panel; the right to be represented by counsel at the Person 's own expense; and a timely, written, reasoned decision .
If no such body as described above is in place and available at the time of the appeal, the decision may be appealed to CAS in accordance with the applicable procedural rules .
13.2.3 Persons Entitled to Appeal 13.2.3.1 Appeals Involving International -Level Athletes or International Events In cases under Article 13.2.1, the following parties shall have the right to appeal to CAS: (a) the Athlete or other Person who is the subject of the decision being appealed; (b) the other party to the case in which the decision was rendered; (c) World Lacrosse ; (d) the National Anti -Doping Organization of the Person’s country of residence or countries where the Person is a national or license holder; (e) the International Olympic Comm ittee or International Paralympic Committee, as applicable, where the decision may have an effect in relation to the Olympic Games or Paralympic Games, including decisions affecting eligibility for the Olympic Games or Paralympic Games; and (f) WADA .
13.2.3.2 Appeals Involving Other Athletes or Other Persons 65 [Comment to Article 13.2.1: CAS decisions are final and binding except for any review required by law applicable to the annul ment or enforcement of arbitral awards.]
WADA 2021 IF Model Rules ( December 2019) Page 48 of 69 In cases under Article 13.2.2, the parties having the right to appeal to the appellate body shall be as provided in the National Anti -Doping Organization's rules but, at a minimum, shall include the following parties: (a) the Athlete or other Person who is the subject of the decision being appealed; (b) the other party to the case in which the decision was rendered; (c) World Lacrosse ; (d) the National Anti -Doping Organization of the Person’s country of residence or countries where the Person is a national or license holder; (e) the International Olympic Committee or International Paralympic Committee, as applicable, where the decision may have an effect in r elation to the Olympic Games or Paralympic Games, including decisions affecting eligibility for the Olympic Games or Paralympic Games; and (f) WADA .
For cases under Article 13.2.2, WADA , the International Olympic Committee, the International Paralympic C ommittee, and World Lacrosse shall also have the right to appeal to CAS with respect to the decision of the appellate body.
Any party filing an appeal shall be entitled to assistance from CAS to obtain all relevant information from the Anti-Doping Organization whose decision is being appealed and the information shall be provided if CAS so directs.
13.2.3.3 Duty to Notify All parties to any CAS appeal must ensure that WADA and all other part ies with a right to appeal have been given timely notice of the appeal.
13.2.3.
4 Appeal from Imposition of Provisional Suspension Notwithstanding any other provision herein, the only Person who may appeal from the imposition of a Provisional Suspension is the Athlete or other Person upon whom the Provisional Suspension is imposed.
13.2.3.5 Appeal from Decisions under Article 12 Decisions by World Lacrosse pursuant to Article 12 may be appealed exclusively to CAS by the National Governing Body or other body .
13.2.4 Cross Appeals and other Subsequent Appeals Allowed Cross appeals and other subsequent appeals by any respondent named in cases brought to CAS under the Code are specifically permitted.
Any party with a right to appeal under this Article 13 must file a cross appeal or subsequent appeal at the latest with th e party’s answer.66 13.3 Failure to Render a Timely Decision by World Lacrosse Where, in a particular case, World Lacrosse fails to render a decision with respect to whether an anti-doping rule violation was committed within a reasonable deadline set by WADA , WADA may elect to appeal directly to CAS as if World Lacrosse had rendered a decision finding no anti -doping rule viol ation.
If the CAS hearing panel determines that an anti -doping rule violation was committed 66 [Comment to Article 13.2.4: This provision is necessary because since 2011, CAS rules no longer permit an Athlete the right to cross appeal when an Anti -Doping Organization appeals a decision after the Athlete’s time for appeal has expired.
This provision permits a full hearing for all pa rties.]
WADA 2021 IF Model Rules ( December 2019) Page 49 of 69 and that WADA acted reasonably in electing to appeal directly to CAS, then WADA’s costs and attorney fees in prosecuting the appeal shall be reimbursed to WADA by World Lacrosse .67 13.4 Appeals Relating to TUEs TUE decisions may be appealed exclusively as provided in Article 4.4.
13.5 Notification of Appeal Decisions World Lacrosse shall promptly provide the appeal decision to the Athlete or other Person and to the other Anti-Doping Organizations that would have been entitled to appeal under Article 13.2.3 as provided under Article 14.2.
13.6 Time for Filing Appeals68 13.6.1 Appeals to CAS The time to file an appeal to CAS shall be twenty -one (21) days from the date of receipt of the decision by the appealing party.
The above notwithstanding, the following shall apply in connection with appeals filed by a party entitled to appeal but which was not a party to the proceedings that led to the decision being appealed: (a) Within fifteen (15) days from the notice of the decision, such party/ies shall have the right to request a copy of the full case file pertaining to the decision from the Anti-Doping Organization that had Results Management authority ; (b) If such a request is made within the fifteen (15) day period, then the party making such request shall have twenty -one (21) days from receipt of the file to file an appeal to CAS.
The above notwithstanding, the filing deadline for an appeal filed by WADA shall be the later of: (a) Twenty -one (21) days afte r the last day on which any other party having a right to appeal could have appealed , or (b) Twenty -one (21) days after WADA’s receipt of the complete file relating to the decision.
13.6.2 Appeals Under Article 13.2.2 The time to file an appeal to an independent and impartial body in accordance with rules established by the National Anti -Doping Organization shall be indicated by the same rules of the National Anti -Doping Organization .
The above notwithstanding, the fil ing deadline for an appeal filed by WADA shall be the later of: 67 [Comment to Article 13.3: Given the different circumstances of each anti -doping rule violation investigation and Results Management process, it is not feasible to establish a fixed time period for World Lacrosse to render a decision before WADA may intervene by appealing directly to CAS.
Before taking such action, however, WADA will consult with World Lacrosse and give World Lacrosse an opportunity to explain why it has not yet rendered a decision.]
68 [Comment to Article 13.6: Whether governe d by CAS rules or these Anti -Doping Rules, a party’s deadline to appeal does not begin running until receipt of the decision.
For that reason, there can be no expiration of a party's right to appeal if the party has not received the decision.]
WADA 2021 IF Model Rules ( December 2019) Page 50 of 69 (a) Twenty -one (21) days after the last day on which any other party having a right to appeal could have appealed, or (b) Twenty -one (21) days after WADA’s receipt of the complete file relating to the decision.
ARTICLE 14 CONFIDENTIALITY AND REPORTING 14.1 Information Concerning Adverse Analytical Findings , Atypical Findings , and Other Asserted Anti -Doping Rule Violations 14.1.1 Notice of Anti -Doping R ule Violations to Athletes and other Persons Notice to Athletes or other Persons of anti -doping rule violations asserted against them shall occur as provided under Articles 7 and 14.
If at any point during Results Management up until the anti -doping rule violation charge, World Lacrosse decides not to move forward with a matter, it must notify the Athlete or other Person , (provided that the Athlete or other Person had been already informed of the ongoing Results Management ).
14.1.2 Notice of Anti -Doping Rule Violations to National Anti -Doping Organizations and WADA Notice of the assertion of an anti -doping rule violation to the Athlete’s or other Person’s National Anti -Doping Organization and WADA shall occur as provided under Articles 7 and 14, simultaneously with the notice to the Athlete or other Person .
If at any point during Results Management up until the anti -doping rule violation charge, World Lacrosse decides not to move forward with a ma tter, it must give notice (with reasons) to the Anti-Doping Organizations with a right of appeal under Article 13.2.3.
14.1.3 Content of an Anti -Doping Rule Violation Notice Notification of an anti -doping rule violation shall include: the Athlete's or other Person’s name, country, sport and discipline within the sport, the Athlete’s competitive level , whether the test was In-Competition or Out-of-Competition , the date of Sampl e collection, the analytical result reported by the laboratory, and other information as required by the International Standard for Results Management .
Notification of anti -doping rule violations other than under Article 2.1 shall also include the rule vi olated and the basis of the asserted violation.
14.1.4 Status Reports Except with respect to investigations which have not resulted in a notice of an anti -doping rule violation pursuant to Article 14.1.1, the Athlete’s or other Person’s National Anti -Doping Organization and WADA shall be regularly updated on the status and f indings of any review or proceedings conducted pursuant to Article 7, 8 or 13 and shall be provided with a prompt written reasoned explanation or decision explaining the resolution of the matter.
14.1.5 Confidentiality The recipient organizations shall not disclose this information beyond those Persons with a need to know (which would include the appropriate personnel at the applicable National WADA 2021 IF Model Rules ( December 2019) Page 51 of 69 Olympic Committee , National Governing Body , and team in a Team Sport ) until World Lacrosse has made Public Disclosure as permitted by Article 14.3.
14.1.6 Protection of Confidential Information by an Employee or Agent of the World Lacrosse World Lacrosse shall ensure that information concerning Adverse Analytical Findings , Atypical Findings , and other asserted anti -doping rule violations remains confidential until such information is Publicly Disclosed in accordance with Article 14.3 .
World Lacrosse shall ensure that its employees (whether permanent or otherwise), contractors, agents , consultants, and Delegated Third Parties are subject to fully enforceable contractual duty of confidentiality and to fully enforceable procedures for the investigation and disciplining of improper and/or unauthorized disclosure of such confidential information.
14.2 Notice of Anti -Doping Rule Violation or violations of Ineligibility or Provisional Suspension Decisions and Request for Files 14.2.1 Anti-doping rule violation decisions or decisions related to violations of Ineligibility or Provisional Suspension rendered pursuant to Article 7.
6, 8.2, 10.5, 10.6, 10.7, 10.14.3 or 13.5 shall include the full reasons for the decision, including, if appli cable, a justification for why the maximum potential sanction was not imposed .
Where the decision is not in English or French, World Lacrosse shall provide an English or French summary of the decision and the supporting reasons.
14.2.2 An Anti-Doping Organization having a right to appeal a decision received pursuant to Article 14.2.1 may, within fifteen ( 15) days of receipt, request a copy of the full case file pertaining to the decision.
14.3 Public Disclosure 14.3.1 After notice has been provided to the Athlete or other Person in accordance with the International Standard for Results Management , and to the applicable Anti-Doping Organizations in accordance with Article 14.1.2, the identity of any Athlete or other Person who is notified of a potential anti -doping rule violation, the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method and the nature of the violation involved, and whether the Athlete or ot her Person is subject to a Provisional Suspension may be Publicly Disclosed by World Lacrosse .
14.3.2 No later than twenty (20) days after it has been determined in an appellate decision under Article 13.2.1 or 13.2.2, or such appeal has been waived, or a hearing in accordance with Article 8 has been waived, or the assertion of an anti -doping rule violation has not otherwise been timely challenged, or the matter has been resolved under Article 10.8, or a new period of Ineligibility , or reprimand, has been imposed under Article 10.14.3, World Lacrosse must Publicly Disclose the disposition of the anti-doping matter, including the sport, the anti -doping rule violated, the name of the Athlete or other Person committing the violation, t he Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method involved (if any) and the Consequences imposed.
World Lacrosse must also Publicly Disclose within WADA 2021 IF Model Rules ( December 2019) Page 52 of 69 twenty (20) days the results of appellate decisions concerning anti -doping rule violations, including the informa tion described above .69 14.3.3 After an anti -doping rule violation has been determined to have been committed in an appellate decision under Article 13.2.1 or 13.2.2 or such appeal has been waived, or in a hearing in accordance with Article 8 or where such hearing has been waived, or th e assertion of an anti -doping rule violation has not otherwise been timely challenged, or the matter has been resolved under Article 10.8, World Lacrosse may make public such determination or decision and may comment publicly on the matter.
14.3.4 In any case where it is determined, after a hearing or appeal, that the Athlete or other Person did not commit an anti -doping rule violation, the fact that the decision has been appealed may be Publicly Disclosed .
However, the decision itself and the underlying facts may not be Publicly D isclosed except with the consent of the Athlete or other Person who is the subject of the decision.
World Lacrosse shall use reasonable efforts to obtain such consent , and if cons ent is obtained, shall Publicly Disclose the decision in its entirety or in such redacted form as the Athlete or other Person may approve.
14.3.5 Publication shall be accomplished at a minimum by placing the required information on the World Lacrosse ’s website and leaving the information up for the longer of one (1) month or the duration of any period of Ineligibility .
14.3.6 Except as provided in Articles 14.3.1 and 14.3.3, no Anti-Doping Organization , National Governing Body , or WADA -accredited laboratory, or any official of any such body, shall publicly comment on the specific facts of any pending case (as opposed to general description of process and science) except in response to public comments attributed to, or based on informatio n provided by, the Athlete , other Person or their entourage or other representatives.
14.3.7 The mandatory Public Disclosure required in Article 14.3.2 shall not be required where the Athlete or other Person who has been found to have committed an anti-doping rule violation is a Minor , Protected Person or Recreational Athlete .
Any optional Public Disclosure in a case involving a Minor , Protected Person or Recreational Athlete shall be proportionate to the facts and circumstances of the case.
14.4 Statistical Reporting World Lacrosse shall, at least annually , publish publicly a general statistical report of its Doping Control activities, with a copy provided to WADA .
World Lacrosse may also publish reports showing the name of each Athlete tested and the date of each Testing .
14.5 Doping Control Information Database and Monitoring of Compliance To enable WADA to perform its compliance monitoring role and to ensure the effective use of resources and sharing of applicable Doping Control information among Anti-Doping Organizations , World Lacrosse shall report to WADA through ADAMS Doping Control -related informati on, including, in particular: 69 [Comment to Article 14.3.2: Where Public Disclosure as required by Article 14.3.2 would result in a breach of other applicabl e laws, World Lacrosse ’s failure to make the Public Disclosure will not result in a determination of non -compliance with Code as set forth in Article 4.1 of the International Standard for the Protection of Privacy and Personal Information.]
WADA 2021 IF Model Rules ( December 2019) Page 53 of 69 (a) Athlete Biological Passport data for International -Level Athletes and National -Level Athletes , (b) Whereabouts information for Athletes including those in Registered Testing Pools , (c) TUE decisions, and (d) Results Ma nagement decisions, as required under the applicable International Standard(s) .
14.5.1 To facilitate coordinated test distribution planning, avoid unnecessary duplication in Testing by various Anti-Doping Organizations , and to ensure that Athlete Biolog ical Passport profiles are updated , World Lacrosse shall report all In-Competition and Out-of-Competition tests to WADA by entering the Doping Control forms into ADAMS in accordance with the requirements and timelines contained in the International Standard for Testing and Investigations.
14.5.2 To facilitate WADA ’s oversight and appeal rights for TUEs , World Lacrosse shall report all TUE applications, decisions and supporting documentation using ADAMS in accordance with the requirements and timelines contained in the International Standard for Therapeutic Use Exemptions .
14.5.3 To facilitate WADA ’s oversight and appeal rights for Results Management , World Lacrosse shall report the following information into ADAMS in accordance with the requirements and timelines outlined in the International Standard for Results Management : (a) notifications of an ti-doping rule violations and related decisions for Adverse Analytical Findings ; (b) notifications and related decisions for other anti-doping rule violations that are not Adverse Analytical Findings ; (c) whereabouts failures ; and (d) any decision imposing , lifting or reinstating a Provisional Suspension .
14.5.4 The information described in this Article will be made accessible, where appropriate and in accordance with the applicable rules, to the Athlete , the Athlete ’s National Anti -Doping Organization , and any other Anti-Doping Organizations with Testing authority o ver the Athlete .
14.6 Data Privacy 14.6.1 World Lacrosse may collect, store, process or disclose personal information relating to Athletes and other Persons where necessary and appropriate to conduct its Anti-Doping Activities under the Code , the International Standards (including specifically the International Standard for the Protection of Privacy and Personal Information) , these Anti -Doping Rules , and in compliance with applicable law .
14.6.2 Without limiting the foregoing, World Lacrosse shall: (a) Only process personal information in accordance with a valid legal ground; (b) Notify any Participant or Person subject to these Anti -Doping Rules, in a manner and form that complies with applicable laws and the International Standard for the Protection of Privacy and Personal Information, that their personal information may be processed by World Lacrosse and other Person s for the purpose of the implementation of these Anti -Doping Rules ; WADA 2021 IF Model Rules ( December 2019) Page 54 of 69 (c) Ensure that any third -party agents (including any Delegated Third Party ) with whom World Lacrosse shares the personal information of any Participant or Person is subject to appropriate technical and contractual controls to protect the confidentiality and p rivacy of such information.
ARTICLE 15 IMPLEMENTATION OF DECISIONS 15.1 Automatic Binding Effect of Decisions by Signatory Anti-Doping Organizations 15.1.1 A decision of an anti -doping rule violation made by a Signatory Anti -Doping Organization , an appellate body (Article 13.2.2 of the Code ) or CAS shall, after the parties to the proceeding are notified, automatically be binding beyond the parties to the proc eeding upon World Lacrosse and its National Governing Bodies , as well as every Signatory in every sport with the effects described below: 15.1.1.1 A decision by any of the above -described bodies imposing a Provisional Suspension (after a Provisional Hearing has occurred or the Athlete or other Person has either accepted the Provisional Suspension or has waived the right to a Provisional Hearing , expedited hearing or expedited appeal offered in accordance with Article 7.4.3) automatically p rohibits the Athlete or other Person from participation (as described in Article 10.14.1) in all sports within the authority of any Signatory during the Provisional Suspension .
15.1.1.2 A decision by any of the above -described bodies imposing a period o f Ineligibility (after a hearing has occurred or been waived) automatically prohibits the Athlete or other Person from participation (as described in Article 10.14.1) in all sports within the authority of any Signatory for the period of Ineligibility .
15.1.1.3 A decision by any of the above -described bodies accepting an anti -doping rule violation automatically binds all Signatories .
15.1.1.4 A decision by any of the above -described bodies to Disqualify results under Article 10.10 for a specified period automatically Disqualifies all results obtained within the authority of any Signatory during the specified period.
15.1.2 World Lacrosse and its National Governing Bodies shall recognize and implement a decision and its effects as required by Article 15.1.1, without any further action required, on the earlier of the date World Lacrosse receives actual notice of the decision or the date the decision is placed into ADAMS .
15.1.3 A decision by an Anti-Doping Organization , a national appellate body or CAS to suspend, or lift, Consequences shall be binding upon World Lacrosse and its National Governing Bodies without any further action required, on the earlier of the date World Lacrosse receives actual notice of the decision or the date the decision is placed into ADAMS .
15.1.4 Notwithstanding any provision in Article 15.1.1, however, a decision of an anti -doping rule violation by a Major Event Organization made in an ex pedited process during an Event shall not be binding on World Lacrosse or its National Governing Bodies unless the rules of the Major Event Organization provide the WADA 2021 IF Model Rules ( December 2019) Page 55 of 69 Athlete or other Person with an opportunity to an appeal under non -expedited procedures .70 15.2 Implementation of Other Decisions by Anti-Doping Organizations World Lacrosse and its National Governing Bodies may decide to implement other anti -doping decisions rendered by Anti-Doping Organizations not described in Article 15.1.1 above, such a s a Provisional Suspension prior to a Provisional Hearing or acceptance by the Athlete or other Person .71 15.3 Implementation of Decisions by Body that is not a Signatory An anti -doping decision by a body that is not a Signatory to the Code shall be implemented by World Lacrosse and its National Governing Bodies , if World Lacrosse finds that the decision purports to be within the authority of that body and the anti -doping r ules of that body are otherwise consistent with the Code .72 ARTICLE 16 STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS No anti -doping rule violation proceeding may be commenced against an Athlete or other Person unless he or she has been notified of the anti -doping rule violation as provided in Article 7, or notification has been reasonably attempted, within ten (10) years from the date the violation is asserted to have occurred.
ARTICLE 17 EDUCATION World Lacr osse shall plan, implement, evaluate and promote Education in line with the requirements of Article 18.2 of the Code and the International Standard for Education .
ARTICLE 1 8 ADDITIONAL ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF NATIONAL GOVERNING BODIES 18.1 All National Governing Bodies and their members shall comply with the Code, International Standards , and these Anti -Doping Rules.
All National Governing Bodies and other members shall include in their policies, rules and programs the provisions necessary to 70 [Comment to Article 15.1.4: By way of example, where the rules of the Major Event Organization give the Athlete or other Pers on the option of c hoosing an expedited CAS appeal or a CAS appeal under normal CAS procedure, the final decision or adjudication by the Major Event Organization is binding on other Signatories regardless of whether the Athlete or other Person chooses the expedited appeal op tion.]
71 [Comment to Articles 15.1 and 15.2: Anti -Doping Organization decisions under Article 15.1 are implemented automatically by other Signatories without the requirement of any decision or further action on the Signatories’ part.
For example, when a National Anti - Doping Organization decides to Provisionally Suspend an Athlete, that decision is given automatic effect at the International Federation National Governing Body level.
To be clear, the “decision” is the one made by the National Anti -Doping Organization, there is not a separate decision to be made by the International Federation National Governing Body .
Thus, any claim by the Athlete that the Provisional Suspension was improperly imposed can only be asserted against the National Anti -Doping Organization.
Implementation of Anti -Doping Organizations’ decisions under Article 15.2 is subject to each Signatory’s discretion.
A Signatory’s implementation of a decision under Article 15.1 or Article 15.2 is not appealable separately from any appe al of the underlying decision.