text
stringlengths 6
5k
| racial_origin
int64 0
3
| gender_sex
int64 0
3
| religion
int64 0
3
| ability
int64 0
3
| violence
int64 0
3
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
User UXIVAS is back – worth keepin' an eye on | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Hello Merbabu! Thanks for your reply. I was going to revert too to your version (I went and read the article on the Banda Islands and saw the references), but had to leave in a hurry. Thank you for you compliment on the map - I did loose some time with it! It is still a work in progress, though. I see that you are a member of WikiProject Indonesia, maybe you could help with more precise locations for the Portuguese presence in the area - actual possessions and for how long, areas of explorations, influence and commerce/trade. Exact locations are not easy to came by! As for the reason for the split into two articles, it was done by an user called . You can check all the relevant discussions (and participate!) in Talk:Portuguese Empire#An exploration = Empire? and Talk:Portuguese Empire#Anachronous map of the Portuguese Empire (1415-1999). Please do! Cheers! " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Greater Than Fire, KevinJDrieberg!
Wikipedia editor just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Greater Than Fire is up for deletion. Do you know what to do?
To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.
Learn more about page curation. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Caucasoid
Is it really necessary to mention that some Uyghurs are fair-skinned and have Caucasoid traits? It sounds a bit like Nazi ""science"" to me... Luis Rib
Well, they do have such traits. You can phrase it a bit differently if you like. ]] 02:24, Oct 4, 2004 (UTC)
It wouldn't be necessary if we lived in a world in which race (whether considered a real or constructed category) was irrelevant. Unfortunately, that's not the case. The ethnic characteristics of Uyghurs play an important role in discussions of the relationship between Uyghurs and Han Chinese and thus how ""Chinese"" Xinjiang is or should be. In order to understand the politics of Uyghur/Chinese relations, it's important to know that these characteristics are commonly discussed. 20:20, 2 February 2006
(UTC)
Why Caucasoid traits? These traits are probably more Semitic than Caucasoid. 86.166.123.12
The more we try to parse this issue the thornier it gets. Read the Caucasian race entry in Wikipedia and see if you can find any way to separate Semitic from Caucasoid. The entire concept of race is in dispute, and regardless of how people ordinarily discuss differences, an encyclopedia ought to try to avoid such uninformed hypotheses in its entries. It might be better to describe, for example, a people as having blue eyes and fair skin and lacking the epicanthic fold, as well as being largely Muslim, than to try to categorize them by ""race,"" and so I'd agree that dropping ""Caucasoid"" would be smart. After all, much of the European population has at least some Mongolian ancestry, as do Iranians, Turks, Central Asians, and so on - and Uyghurs are certainly included in this distribution regardless of their ""Caucasoid traits."" And if you go back far enough, I suppose the entire world population has African ancestry. You can see how this can become like an argument about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin, and has no place in an encyclopedia that is trying to be authoritative and factual.
" | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
How is the article ""promoting or advertising"" Jones' theories? Is it not merely stating his own observations, and also information known to be factual? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
he did to Weekly Jump | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Taxonomic error
Mr. Shyamal, who is written in the articles of Rognes is an enormous stupidity. Because in the monograph of Senior-White, Aubertin & Smart, 1940, Diptera, vol. VI, Family Calliphoridae - Fauna of British India 83, it is mentioned:
« Bengalia R.D., Myodaiores, p. 425, 1830 / Genotype, B. labiata R.D. ».
This fact is confirmed per much author, among the large specialists of the world Kurahashi, Benjaphong & Omar (1997:39), Yu. Verves (2005:238).
Burmanos | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
So, you're saying place signs were using C for place names with the sound /ʃ/? Or were you saying you only saw the signs with the letter C (without hearing how names are pronounced -you only said you saw C earlier)?/ ⁽ᵗᵃˡᵏ⁾ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- I put the link here but it was immediately removed, look through this page history to get to read the uncensored truth. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
whats up gook
Whats up you asian gook chink man hoe chow how much rice did you pick today? all asians are filthy dog eating pieces of excretement, we raped your countryies during korea and vietnam war. | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Unspecified source for Image:Redeemer10.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Redeemer10.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (Contr) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
See canvassing here and here. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You left me hanging! Did you give her the razor? Did she need help? LOL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
wtf
your a queer | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
That's why I pretty clearly put the ~ in there to indicate a paraphrase of the quote I was responding to, which was substantively accurate. More importantly however, semicolons separate independent clauses. I very explicitly responded to ""Most people have never even heard of it."" At this point you're just looking for anything to harp on, and it's pretty silly. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Ask younus Harami to start counting days. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I agree. I just think that we can give a sample of what comes below, by what comes at top. This might in the end only have 2 parts, like with terrorism article. I think this ordered approach has worked well, for the definition of controversial, multifaceted, misnomeric terms. PS.If I have time, I should like to merge our discussions into an ordered tier, if that would be helpful. -vertigo | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dear Cirt I wish to answer you here as well as on the Afd where I have replaced my comment. My comment was in no way intended to be a personal attack. Being a channer is just a choice of webforum. It really wasn't meant as an attack. However, I thought that you were very reasonable in your response(s) to me AfD, then I was quite surprised by one particular conversation on your talk page which I took as meaning that you were conversing with other 4chan members on Wikipedia. I accept that I may have misinterpreted this conversation. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
May 2011
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Nelson Frazier, Jr.. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
articles put up for deletion arent voted on, people give their opinion and then state their reasons for wanting an article kept or deleted. Then someone comes and judges the merit of each sides argument. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Please also be sure to cite a reliable source when you add or change information in any article. Thanks! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Your aggression is unwarranted. You desire the world's children to see pornography? What?! I fail to understand your anger at me.
Xchanter | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
}}
{{WikiProject United States
|class=Start
|importance=low | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
what do you mean
why don't you keep your nose out of other people's fucking business you twat | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
It can be substantiated. I really don't care to file an RFC. I can't wait for this latest one your buddy is talking about though. In fact, once the RFC is posted, make sure everyone in the article knows, so we can all comment. Who's the sockpuppets this time? You? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bob
What's wrong with the picture? Can you make a better one? If so, please do tell. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I think you should rest for a while from WP, take a vac, it would be useful for you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Charles Dickens. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Push my button " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
There is a problem here, is that some editors claim Detroit is not the birthplace of Techno, but do not provide citations to back up their position. At the same time, the internet is bulging at the seams with information showing that Detroit is where Techno was birthed. Certainly, Europe has adopted Techno as it's own, more than America or even Detroit ever has or did, but unless we can get some REAL citations going we need to remove, what I see as, the wishful editing claims that Techno began in Western Europe. We REQUIRE citations. I'm honestly pretty neutral in this, I enjoy techno, but I prefer other genres. I just happened to stumble across the article, read the first sentence and checked the ""citation"" for the Western Europe claim (as it was news to me) and was sent to a dead page. I searched ""techno origins"" and found numerous pages saying Detroit birthed techno and added those cites. The evidence is just flat out contradictory to what some editors (wish to) believe. Honestly I do not care, but if Wikipedia is to be a reliable source, we as a community must be honest with what the facts are, or provide evidence (in citations) for alternate claims. I won't be doing any further edits in this article, I'll leave this one alone, I can sense this could turn ugly real quick, so I leave it to people who care more than I do. Ultimately, if I'm wrong fine, no biggie, just please give good citations." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
here is the edit you just warned me for, please stop being a busybody. this is exactly the kind of noob hate i was talking about. thanks. 86.44.33.121 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
You said that the article should present the facts as found by the ICTY. And they were presented that way. I don't see what is the problem (Actually I know what the problem is, for you and your friends). On the other hand, there is a planty of sources including UN resolutions, US resolution, academic and human rights institutions as HRW and UCR, even in Serbia for instance Natasa Kandic and Fond za humanitarno pravo, which call it the Srebrenica Genocide. So, no need to lie, nor deny. Regards. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Quite possible. As I've alluded to in other posts, things often got mixed up when the explorers noted these things down. I've only ever heard Black Mountain and Mount Ainslie mentioned, but it could have been Mount Ainslie and Mount Majura. I still think the ""Nganbra"" explanation should be present in the ""Canberra"" article as well as the ""History of Canberra"" article. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
In favor of merging==
Since August 2010, the underground and aboveground Cheongnyangni stations have been directly transferrable through a transfer passageway, contradicting Peterhansen2032's argument. As a rule of thumb, on transferrable stations on the Seoul Subway, the information is combined into one, even for stations with different names (e.g. Isu Station, Cheonan Station). Rather than having to go through a disambiguation page to access information on one of the stations, it would be much more efficient to integrate it into one page for convenient viewing. I support merging.
== | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Your concern at Wikipedia_talk:IP_block_exemption
I have replied on that page. Briefly, it seemed that talk page consensus was leaning towards having an admin do the task instead of a checkuser, for diverse reasons. Please indicate on the talk page whether or not you agree. I will wait to take action until you reply. As I am biting my nails somewhat, please reply soon! -) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Boxer Stadium
JonBroxton can you help me with a soccer stadium in San Francisco. You uploaded a great overhead photo of in 2008 and I want to do the same for Boxer Stadium and am having problems. NASA World Wind doesn't have enough data and http://msrmaps.com is a wiki copyright violation. Any suggestions? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Same thing, no difference. Fée is the Old French spelling, while Fay is the middle/modern English spelling (the word was borrowed from Old French, mind you). | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Retired numbers - Peyton Manning removal
A user, who I've engaged in conversation on their talk page, removed Peyton Manning from the ""Retired numbers"" section of the article, on the grounds that it's ""assumed"" though not ""official."" My reasoning as posted on said talk page, was that Jim Irsay, the CEO of the Colts, stated pretty firmly that no player will ever wear the number 18 again (http://www.thephinsider.com/2012/3/7/2853459/peyton-manning-press-conference-transcript-2012-free-agency-nfl). There need not be an official retirement ceremony, or banner hanging in the rafters for the number to be retired. As such, I would open it up to discussion, but I feel that Manning needs to be readded, with the sourcing material included to prevent future confusion. 208.40.242.41 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Never mind I found them. But I was talking about the one on the top of your page. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hi Bading
Putang ina mong bakla ka. Fuck you kang bading ka. Chumupa ka nalang gago ka. Puta puta ka. Walang magawa sa buhay! Diba asawa mo si NrDg. Chiunuchupaan mo siya. Tang ina mo mahilig ka talaga sa oten. Fuck Fuck you!!!! Bullshit na Bading. Manyak mahilig manuod ng mga bold na man to man. Fuck Fuck you. Putang ina mo Baboy na bakla. 210.4.58.35 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Ah, okay. Thanks for your swift response. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bald Rock
I was thinking about that! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
SharedIPEDU|Cresskill Public Schools (Cresskill, NJ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You should edit your user page to contain humor if you're going to keep that disclaimer. 129.15.127.253 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I have posted nothing on the article page as this would presumably be a Conflict of Interest, and have made here suggestions of the way in which the book may be used only because requested - my view remains that it should be done by an editor who does not have COI. I think that now we've moved on from the efforts to exclude a source through (wrong) application of the Notability guidelines we're left with Neutrality of Point of View as the main issue. Wikipedia reports what is out there and a decision to exclude entirely from an article an appropriate source which has a view on much that is in the article (as well as topics the article excludes) appears to be a bias. The idea that the only book of lit crit on Beedle the Bard has nothing whatsoever to add to an encyclopaedia article on the topic is incredible. I don't think COIN is central to the issue as it now stands; rather the central issue is NPV. I think there are wider issues which it would be interesting to discuss - for example had my username not been essentially my real name a post on the talk page a year ago saying ""hi guys, this book exists and has something to say about the article"" would not have generated this negative discussion. I suggest MedCab is a way forward because it can consider all issues, while COIN considers only one issue and probably one which is not central. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Study some linguistics before you say something idiotic like ""since when do verbs have plurals."" Moron." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
May 2008
Testing, mememe. Little O'l Lady Who? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This is the note I have added to the 1612 in Ireland discussion page:
This deletion is a bit quick off the mark and fails to take any notice of context, particularly my trying to add birth and death entries to Years in Ireland. I am adding content to all the Years in Ireland articles as I find it and will be adding more to this, as I will to other such articles. It also allows others to add content in the collaborative way that is supposed to be Wiki - deletion this speedy allows no opportunity for this. Please have a modicum of patience - this speedy deletion approach is a very bad policy when applied in this way. NB this is not the same as 1612 itself. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
SS Yongala
Hey there, I found an article about SS Yongala, which I have started doing some additional work on. Thought you may be interested in helping. It needs a fair amount of work such coordinates, info box, editing, typos etc. Anyway, if you are interested, I look forward to your imput. Cheers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
THE ARTICLE TITLED THE ELLIOTT ARGUMENT IS VERY WELL SOURCED, NOTEABLE, HAS TONS OF REFERENCES, AND SEEMS TO MEET ALL THE CRITERIA. IT IN NO WAY IS ATTACKING ANY GROUP BUT RATHER IS A FORMAL ARGUMENT THAT IS NEUTRAL AND HAS A STRONG FOOTING IN THE CREATIONISM VS ATHEISM DEBATING SCENE. IT WILL UNDOUBTABLY WILL BE SWAMPED BY ATHEISTS TRYING TO TAKE IT DOWN AND SITE REASONS WHY IT SHOULD NOT BE ON WIKIPEDIA. I ASK THAT YOU PLEASE KEEP IT UP IN ALL FAIRNESS AS A LOT OF WORK HAS WENT INTO THE CREATION OF THIS ARTICLE AND THE FORMAL ARGUMENT ITSELF. REMINDER IF IT WASN'T WORTHY AND NO ONE CARED ABOUT IT, IT WOULDNT BE SUCH A TALKED ABOUT TOPIC/ARTICLE OF CONVERSATION. THANK YOU, AND I HOPE I HAVE MET ALL YOUR STANDARDS. ALSO, ATHEISTS PLEASE DO NOT EDIT OR ATTEMPT TO CENSOR THSI ARTICLE, BUT RATHER IF YOU CAN FEEL YOU CAN DEFEAT THE ARGUMENT LEAVE IT UP AS PROOF THAT IT IS FLAWED...THANK YOU AGAIN | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Forget it. After reading your other discussions with The Egyptian Liberal, you obviously have a different agenda than providing straightforward information as in an encyclopedia. Which is why both of you are being reported. I'm totally shocked and appalled. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
AfD nomination of Word by word dictionary
I have nominated Word by word dictionary, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Word by word dictionary. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
LoL!!
you're GAY!! you will never know how good it feels to fuck a woman up the ass!! | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
I am fed up with editors and administrators ignoring requests for assistance in removing personal attacks by dismissing inappropriate behaviour as 'that's just the way he is'. If Mr Steadman's ego is so fragile that he cannot participate in an online debate without getting hysterical, then perhaps he shouldn't do it. I want these comments removed. If not, then I will refer you to arbitaration for abuse of admin privileges, I will refer Mr Steadman for his CIV/AGF and NO PERSONAL ATTACKS - to get his page deleted or improved and to have him sanctioned.
You keep on playing the guilt card and telling me to move on - I have, I have kept away from him - all I want is for someone to prevent him from attacking me. Please sort it. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Don Patch's Parents and Childhood ==
I think I know who Don Patch's parents are and what he looked like in his childhood from this pic.
== | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No problem, I understand. Cheers,— • (yo?); 16:12, February 16, 2009 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Age
Yeah it said that Snake was aged because of FoxDie, but the actual reason was faulty cloning of the sixties. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
There is of course more than enough information on templates at Wikipedia:Templates. But what you are looking to do is to just add , or the like, to something you are already familiar editing with. To put two historical populations tables together you would use a table (Help:Table). To put Template:Historical populations into the template space for a city specific table, you would be using Template:Historical populations as a meta-template, which it is currently not designed for. I suggest asking at Template talk:Historical populations that it can be used in the template space by adding , or similar, to it. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I did not attack anybody. What do you think was an attack? Seems really lame to just accuse, without evidence. My questioning others' motives for unwarranted deletes base upon their own biases, might have been misconstrued. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Comment: Can we successfully close and move the article now? There is a clear consensus in supporting a move, opposition is limited, with the major point of opposition being that a non-consensus that this article should be deleted because Other Stuff Is Non-Notable. Obviously that is not what is being discussed here, and so their opposition is void. It's also been 15 days since the issue opened, and three days since any new comments. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Yawn. How about we dont? - Raja | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hey alabamoy boy why dont you stick your head up your fucking ass and see how far it fucking fits you fucking asshole | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Hello
Category:WelcomeBotResearch
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for writing the article Kingston liu. Unfortunately, it doesn't conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, and has, as a result, been marked for deletion. However, please do not be disheartened by what may or may not happen to your first article, if indeed it is deleted - please continue to edit Wikipedia and add articles which conform with the inclusion criteria. For help, see Help:Contents. To find out what will probably be deleted, see Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Thanks, and if you have any questions, please ask them on my user talk page. To do this, click on my name (just after this sentence) and click discussion at the top and then the (+) button at the top. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
About your improvements; good work, in general. I am still feeling lost about the description of Henry Cow's music being 'intense', a change from 'intensities'. Any music can be 'intense' for an aficionado. Me, I think Frith is intense. D ... Something more descriptive is needed.
Regarding the presence of Beppe Colli, I do not see his notability, and the web magazine Clouds and Clocks is not mentioned elsewhere, by other media sources. When I Google ""clouds and clocks"", I get a 1965 lecture on rationality by Sir Karl Raimund Popper, and I get a children's book on encopresis, the soiling of pants. Similarly, Beppe Colli does not get mentioned elsewhere. The man and the website are not notable.
Applying the same criteria to Babyblaue Seiten and the German reviewer Achim Breiling, I find that Breiling is a medical researcher who has published papers about genes, proteins and cloning, and has written prog rock reviews for the New Gibraltar Encyclopedia of Music in addition to a bunch of them at Babyblaue. CDBaby lists Babyblaue Seiten as a source, and an article exists about that review site in the German Wikipedia. It looks like Breiling in Babyblaue is somewhat more reliable a source than Colli in Clouds. Although Colli's observations are interesting, I cannot see keeping them. It's too bad, because he is the only reviewer who hinted at the CD having some loudness war characteristics, a step down from the dynamic spaciousness of the LP.
About the ""bursts with"" quote from van Peer, the word 'eradicates' was wrong. Van Peer wrote 'eradiates', which is not a word, but he may have intended this construction as a neologism. That, or he misspelled 'radiates'. In any event, I returned 'eradiates' to the article, and added a [sic] template. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
" Wouldn't a better title be ""crypto-as-a-service? At least it would position the Crypto Cloud computing in the Cloud stack. Also there are recent publications on that subject." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Great to hear that! So, what can I do to help? Do I need to ""Retag"" articles with the new tag? Let me know ) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Image Tagging Image:Mesa in Maricopa County map.png
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Mesa in Maricopa County map.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(Meanwhile, I just noticed that an enterprising, scrupulous editor has supplied everything anyone could possible desire in terms of primary, secondary and - for all I know - tertiary sources. So the article's in good shape. Well done, whoever you are - and I apologize in advance that at least one person on this page will accuse you of being my sock puppet. Nothing to see here, Qworty. Move along now.) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The tables will reflect the extent of influence of KONY 2012, the 20 cultural and 12 political figures should also be added to the introduction as well as the info box. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
, are you dumber than you look? asshole. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
I get your reasoning, but my friend Annie Munson who does the same genre started recording in 1989 but didn't make an album untill 1995, yet she says that her coreer started in 1989. i thought it'd be the same with deadmau5, but i do understand your reasoning. i can't find anything in the article other than the name of an album that acknowledges that he was active in 1998 at all. 199.101.61.190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No stats available (November 15)
Hi Henrik,
The stats tool doesn't work anymore. Best regards.
83.49.97.203 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Issues with 86, were worked out. It was a matter of Reliable sources. Anything questionable I go to the rs/noticeboard Which is why I stick to google news and google books. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"2011]]
}}
If you post a message on this page, I'll reply here to avoid fragmenting the discussion. So add it to your watchlist;
If I leave you a message on your talk page, it will be added to my watchlist. So feel free to reply to it there instead of here;
Please sign and date your message by typing four tildes (~~~~).
Fragmented conversations hurt my brain.|-
|I will respond here to comments that are posted here, and, well, elsewhere to comments posted elsewhere. Please, please don't fragment a conversation just to get my attention—if I comment at a page, it's a very safe assumption that I have watchlisted it. If you are concerned that I might miss a post elsewhere, use to notify me here. Stolen at gunpoint from 's Talk Page..." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The article is biased in favor of jews because the first line of the article says jew watch is an anti-semitic web site, which means if the average joe reads that will think the site is one big malicious lie, which it isn't even close 99% of the facts on jew watch are accurate. Jew watch is one of the most scholarly libraries in existence on the jews. Jew watch article is 100% jewish POV. | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Jules De Jongh
Is the Jules that does Skunk's voice the same one on this page here?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/berkshire/content/articles/2006/01/30/radioberks_jules_de_jongh_feature.shtml
Just curious | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
for two reasons. (1) no evidence that its notable enouygh (2) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
He's at it again...=
He's quietly moving all CA route pages. t c | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Speedy deletion of 3spectra
A tag has been placed on 3spectra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"::::::So you're arguing that an organization can be gay one minute and not gay the next, depending on its popularity and which way the prevailing political winds are blowing, and that encyclopedia content should be constantly varying, according to the instantaneous reading of some sort of gay-o-meter? For the purposes of documenting history, this is probably not the right definition of ""gay"" to employ. At a rally trying to make a persuasive argument for gay rights, it probably is. Since Wikipedia is factual knowlege, and not a rally, the gay community doesn't get to vote on the daily gayness of gay things, and that includes NAMBLA, which is a gay organization.
" | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. now | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
See below to properly assess the situation, following more tailing by Irpen. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Walter Mercado
Antonio, quite frankly, you're a fucker for comparing Mercado's sexuality to Babe Ruth's alcoholism. Don't assume everybody shares your bigoted, backward views. 98.232.181.201 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
So my next effort will be revisions on Deconstruction, Lacoue-Labarthe, and a few others. I was really put off by the NYT obit on Derrida please see my blog. 01:57, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I came upon this article in much need of work but am slowly fixing it up. Do you think we can find some real sources for this piece? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
http://www.nysun.com/article/23698 - public interest crap.. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Your edit to The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
atomic49er
User atomic49er
Since I own all copyrights to The Gas Theory and Gravitation and any and all works by me, and you previously rejected these works,
I now prohibit you from posting any mention of these works other than that which I myself have posted.
you rejected my copyright yet I own those pages in question.
I am not and was not offended, however I deny Wikipedia as a credible source.
I have encouraged Google to produce ""encylopediactionary"" all the worlds encyclopedias and dictionaries in one synopsis.
to prevent your site from destroying the worlds sources of reliable information.
your site is nothing more than a goofball run novelty.
your site has repeatedly rejected actual authors and actual people from correcting and publishing their real and true works.
you are a threat to the worlds supply of information.
It is shameful and sad to think how may people you have offended.
citations made by me to courts have been of information that I deemed worth to submit as written.
I however have seen and heard of the grave and serious ""editing"" by your staff which has polluted honest submissions.
I recommend that you stop patting yourself on the back and realize your short comings.
Joseph E Bressman
I say to you all at Wikipedia cease and desist!!!
You must provide references to all the worlds collected resource and reference books!!!
you must correlate your articles with all the worlds encyclopedias and dictionaries !!!
you must at least provide the synopsis from each and every parallel and credible resource.
to assist in the selling of those works which have long stood to enlighten our world !!!
you must not continue on with your lollygagging mam-be-pambe malarkey bulldung freebie rally killing oddness.
I hope you all realize the real and true threat you pose to our world educational process.
poised to extinguish all for profit and long standing publication after the next1
my education is based partly on van nostrand's scientific encyclopedias the encyclopedia astronomy and any and all other reference books which I purchased and owned!.
SO I DEMAND YOU CITE REAL AND TRUE SOURCES SO PEOPLE MIGHT BUY THOSE BOOKS.(cd's/dvd's)
which are more than you hippie yuppie pseudo know it all ""nomanac of idiom"".
ok man??!!???
Jesus H Christ !!.
""""""http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_H._Christ""""""""
unsigned comment added by User:atomic49er (UTC)" | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
AFAIK they were not granted full independence - from some declassified State Department memos I was looking at, when Eric Williams tried to force the US to withdraw from its bases in Trinidad the British government re-assured the US that if Williams became too extreme in his demands they (the UK) could remove him from power. Since this was during the Federation (1960, if I remember correctly) I would infer that the Federation was not independent. Other than that I just have negative proof - that I have never heard of an independence ceremony (which, if it had happened would have been in Trinidad, since the Federal capital was there) and the fact that most of the islands reverted to being British possessions after dissolution. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
American politics arbitration evidence
Hi. You contributed to a recent RFC about this topic area. This message is to notify you that the arbitration proceedings at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics are underway, and evidence about all disruptive edits to articles within this topic is being accepted at the relevant case page. If you wish to submit evidence for the committee to consider in reaching its decision, please do so now. The evidence phase of the case ends soon, and evidence submitted after the deadline may not be considered. Further advice on submitting evidence, and what evidence the committee will accept, is linked at the top of the evidence page. Please contact me or the other drafting arbitrator if you require more time to submit evidence. Thank you. For the Arbitration Committee, [•] " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"Why is ""the New England Patriots defeat the New York Giants 38-35"" of any notable significance to anyone outside of the USA? 122.105.240.66
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
August 07, 2009
Dear Gwen,
Thanks for Blocking Bal537 for his disruptive edits. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
The primary goal of the case based textbook is to inform doctors of what to do when they are asked to perform different medical operations. The case based textbook only has one chapter on circumcision. Its primary goal is to inform doctors of how to react in the case they are asked to perform a circumcision. It does not give an overview of questions that have been raised about the procedure, and doesn't cover sources of controversy in the medical field (only debates). This makes it unfit to speak for this topic. Maybe it would be better to use it to highlight another statement involving controversies in the medical field.
The second source titled Controversies with one author is ok, as it does go over some medical controversies that exist, notably in consent and the parental role.
I think a better sourcing for this statement ""Ethical and legal questions regarding informed consent and autonomy have been raised over non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision.[8][9]"" would be one that highlights significant questions from community groups in a specific demographic. If we could get a source that is clearly indicating that these questions are being raised that would be better.
JohnP " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ignore that last comment, I wrote it before I read your second comment -p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I'm afraid you're wrong. The vast majority of the ""no"" votes addressed policy, mostly WP:RS. They pointed out that (a) the sources are not sufficiently reliable on this topic or that (b) they did not specifically call him a philosopher, but some other variant on the term. In contrast, none of the ""yes"" votes addressed policy in their statements, although you did this in other areas of the debate. 57 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I've reduced the block to 24 hours. Wikiwriter: apologies, your contribution wasn't especially promotional, but it did fall substantially short of our criteria for inclusion. That on its own doesn't usually lead to blocks, but you kept recreating it after it was being deleted, and ignored the warnings on this page. You are blocked for 24 hours: when you return, please don't recreate the article, however, I will restore the copy you had at juicetalk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Sorry for taking so long. I will soon get back too you with a full review. However I can say already, after having read the article twice, that it will most likely pass. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I made it clear I did not want this discussion on my talkpage, yet you bring right back again? Since when is that ok? And, you specifically added ""also edit warring"" in the block reason? I'd like you to clearly explain exactly how I ""edit warred"" (2 reverts, of 2 different users, 2 days apart?) And how am I ""harassing"" anyone""? This block was unnecessary. Admins that make blocks in error can remove their own blocks, and I'd like you to do that. I shouldn't have to wait for another admin to come along. - ''''
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Sorted Abuse by regions and countries. Merged subchapters in, deleted duplicates.
Please take a look.
70.137.181.232 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ed Poor,
East Sea is a local name both in South Korea and Vietnam. It is not an internationally accepted geographic name.
Geographic explanation for the Sea of Japan is obviously needless for this page, but your explanation is inaccurate. The sea is bounded by the Japanese archipelago, Sakhalin and the Asian Continent, not only the Korean peninsula.
00:37, 11 Sep 2003 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I LOVE KATILYN JEWELL!!!! <333333 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits