text
stringlengths 6
5k
| racial_origin
int64 0
3
| gender_sex
int64 0
3
| religion
int64 0
3
| ability
int64 0
3
| violence
int64 0
3
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
"
Seksen the 10,000 turkish-cypriots who were protesting a few months ago (see this) were not protesting against the world (no country imposed any embargoe on North Cyprus). The protests were aimed at Turkey and the imposed austerity measures and the fact that they want to be independent and manage their own affairs. So effectively they feel they're not independent but under occupation (or if you don't like the word, under the ""control"" of Turkey). Back to the issue, the Nicosia article should have the same information/structure as the Cyprus article. In fact the the TRNC (or the occupation for that matter) isn't even mentioned in the Cyprus infobox. That's why North Cyprus exists. We have to be consistent. Otherwise what's the point of having North Nicosia? Lefkoşa Distict should be mentioned there. To me it makes sense for Nicosia to represent the RoC (as it officially does) and North Nicosia to represent the TRNC. You can't have both. " | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Removal of Image
User Abhishek191288 has removed images of the Ranchi Rajdhani Express without a valid reason other than his feelings about my reason for posting the images. Would like others to view the image & comment on it. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Muniz
For the second time, I have deleted Kelly B. Muniz from the list. Neither the list nor Google offer any evidence warranting Muniz’s inclusion on the list. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
on the top you say the post be answered but my last 2 posts have not been answered yet. ( ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(reply:) okay thank you for your comment. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Administratore: I need your help to stop DIREKTOR and Alasdair. They are fools (look my talk page, please; and I WANT A 2-PAGE LETTER OF APOLOGY FROM DIREKTOR)!!! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
It's at User:Bejnar/Faizal Ismail. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Okay, you're right here, but I still think you're wrong about why there should not be a section about Dear in the shooting article. Let's compromise. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
According to [National-Bolshevik Party] the NBPs are not officially branded extremist. Just because you personally feel they are extremist, doesn't give you broad latitude in editing articles accordingly. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Knol - At last!
About time Knol came along. I am tired of the nonsense that is published by Wikipedia. Finally the world according to the world, not a bunch of narrow-minded Wikipedia sysops and administrators. 98.195.24.26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
No I have not ,but will today ,earlier I didn't see this page. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I don't think this qualifies as meatpuppetry - s/he's acting on her/his own advocating for the blocked editor. Canvassing maybe, but not meatpuppetry. · Weigh Anchor · Catacomb | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
kiss my ass you limp dick loser | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Merge Ulrich Merkel here
Since the one assertion made there is made here, I do not see the point of a merge process. Why not simply redirect? if some indepedent content inappropriate to this article is found, it is quite easy to turn the redirect into a now viable article. - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Tim, I have skimmed through that article, and I must say it's a privilege to even be asked to review it, So thank you very much. Alas, am a bit tied for time at the moment with stuff in the ""real world"" (yes, I think it still exists), so any review I offer will probably be for very tiny spelling mistakes and missing links (if there are even any at all, of course)! I know so little about Bax, that reading it will be a complete education. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Indeed, best to just ignore this, because there's a high chance this will get reported again. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Governors of Tamil Nadu
Nicholas, I have been updating List of Governors of Tamil Nadu page for the past few days. Can you please take a look and let me know if it is FL material. Thanks, " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"I would like to mention that you made the rather blatant sexual and violent yourself so if you want to call the police for sending ""sexually harassing messages"" to yourself, be my guest. My original message (which was, admittedly, not very civil itself and I do apologize) was quite different. It can also be grounds for a block yourself. (I'm also rather amused by this formerly congratulatory comment being removed.)
" | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
"
I concur, our external link policy is indeed harsh, but it is the price to pay to not have 50 EL at the bottom of each article (especially in the IT related articles). Don't worry we all make mistakes and yours was done in good faith, but your edits were against Wikipedia Policy. Don't hesitate to put the helpme tag back if you need anything else! talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"==September 2008==
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Your test is here. Shiny!/Oohhh! " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Blotto adrift - admit when you make a mistake. Several other users have pointed out corrections and you still change the pages back to your edits. You and people like you are a shame to wikipedia.
ps - if you were a scholar, which your not - but somehow are allowed to edit, again going to the creditablity of this site - you would have access to scholars portal. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Problems with drugs so they went with Nick Stahl instead. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
has about Russian Jewish book peddlers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
FUCK YOU
BARACK OBAMA IS A MUSLIM, HE SUCKS ASS!!!!!!!!! ( ) | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
Look at the freaking image page, and the cited ISBNs. Try google-searching for once in your life. The manga did not start its first English publication in 2004. Gwern (contribs) 19:13 28 January 2012 (GMT) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Nor do my postings indicate that I am anti-social, have gone rogue, or in any other way must be stopped before I do more damage. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Checkuser
How the hell do I use a checkuser, help me please . jan→ " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hahaha!
Gross, you want to expand the feces portion of the anal sex article? Duuude. Here, let me say it in html:
That's gross.
Horizontal rules rule. Haha get it? | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Rictus
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Rictus, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with . - " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Actually, I could not find a block on Adam Carr, nor an an auto-block from using the auto-block locator. Adam, can you try again to edit please?
If you still can't edit, then I'm at a loss. Maybe someone else can spot something I am missing. I am posting for you as Clown suggested. \talk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Wow! You're doing some great work! ) Looking good. I'll continue to work on HNIN. ℥·start " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Why is this so important that wikipeida must publish this mans income for 2005??? Just because a crusading blogger, who works for the Tribune, needs to publish minutia, does not mean it's Encyclopedic in content WP:BLP WP:GRAPEVINE. Why is this information not found on other Northern Illinois office holders?. Why only Roskam's? What value is this information, other than salacious gossip. Any finally why, so vigorously oppose this? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I'd also agree that ""crackdown"" is not clearly a weaker or milder term than persecutution. http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/07/25/iran.world.protests/ for instance refers to the post-election events in Iran as a crackdown and certainly doesn't seem intended to minimize those events. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Remember the fact that Wikepedia is not a property of Psychotic Terrorist Hindus as well. Control ur Language Man, I can already visualise u when the facts about Terrorist Hindus have already been exposed to the world. This clearly shows the typical mentality of Hindu extremists like u , who do not want to accept the facts
And dont try to fool me with those official Copy Pastes of Wiki | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
Well, the only edit I did there was to fix a link to a new article I split off, so not sure i can be of much help. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
The content you're adding is promotional in tone, making the article read like an ad. I see nothing valuable about adding where the information desk is; every mall has one except maybe a few really dead ones. Nor do I see any value in listing the bus stops as those usually can't be sourced. Malls are common places for bus stops. and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
The point is that people were too busy finding more critiques towards Wolfowitz than criques towards the Power of Nightmares. Im new to Wiki so I havent had time to sign on and learn the game, but I will soon. I just thought I had to throw in my two cents. I will refrain from using the term you people, if there would be a civil open discussion that doesnt resort to worse ad hominems like ""war monger"" or ""neo fascist"". I have plenty of more links to provide." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
German Sadchenkov
Russian version?))) look that https://ru.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2,_%D0%93%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD_%D0%93%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%8C%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I list the peer reviewed publications that support the information that the use CRUSIO continues to remove is shown below. The name of the system that was developed in Dr. Timiras lab is called the Automated Imaging Microscope System and not the automated tissue image analysis system, that the user CRUSIO continues to call it. Please refer to the PUBMED publication at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15990721?dopt=AbstractPlus to verify the name in the 4th sentence of the Abstract. Please verify the information related to CREA at the CREA web site http://crea.berkeley.edu/paul_segall_profile.shtml and http://crea.berkeley.edu/crea.shtml. I would be very happy to discuss these references with you and information with you.
Estrogen receptor-alpha immunoreactivity in the arcuate hypothalamus of young and middle-aged female mice;
Yaghmaie F, Saeed O, Garan SA, Voelker MA, Sternberg H, Timiras PS;
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2010 Feb 16;31(1):15.
Age-dependent loss of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor immunoreactive cells in the supraoptic hypothalamus is reduced in calorically restricted mice;
Yaghmaie F, Saeed O, Garan SA, Voelker MA, Gouw AM, Freitag W, Sternberg H, Timiras PS.;
Neurology & Neurosurgery, Para. 488, Page 99, Sec. 8, Vol 152.2, 2007
Tracking changes in hypothalamic IGF-1 sensitivity with aging and caloric restriction;
F. Yaghmaie, O. Saeed, S.A. Garan, A.M. Gouw, P. Jafar, J. Kaur, S. Nijjar, P.S. Timiras, H. Sternberg and M.A. Voelker;
Experimental Gerontology, Volume 42, Issues 1-2 , January-February 2007, Pages 11-12.
Insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor immunoreactive cells are selectively maintained in the paraventricular hypothalamus of calorically restricted mice;
Saeed O, Yaghmaie F, Garan SA, Gouw AM, Voelker MA, Sternberg H, Timiras PS.;
Int J Dev Neurosci. 2007 Feb;25(1):23-8
Age-dependent loss of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor immunoreactive cells in the supraoptic hypothalamus is reduced in calorically restricted mice;
Yaghmaie F, Saeed O, Garan SA, Voelker MA, Gouw AM, Freitag W, Sternberg H, Timiras PS.;
Int J Dev Neurosci. 2006 Nov;24(7):431-6.
A study of insulin-like growth factor-I receptor immunoreactivity in the supraoptic nucleus of young and old female B6D2F1 mice;
Farzin Yaghmaie, Omar Saeed, Steven A. Garan, Arvin M. Gouw, Tien Tran, Jacqueline Ho, Liu Y. Zhao, Mark A. Voelker and Paola S. Timiras;
FASEB Journal, April 2006, 357.5
Caloric restriction reduces cell loss and maintains estrogen receptor-alpha immunoreactivity in the pre-optic hypothalamus of female B6D2F1 mice;
Yaghmaie F, Saeed O, Garan SA, Freitag W, Timiras PS, Sternberg H;
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2005 Jun;26(3):197-203.
A survey of estrogen receptor-alpha immunoreactivity in the hypothalamus of young, old, and old-calorie restricted female B6D2F1 mice;
F. Yaghmaie, S.A. Garan, O. Saeed, W. Freitag, P.S. Timiras, H. Sternberg, M. Voelker;
Experimental Gerontology, Volume 39, Issues 11-12, November-December 2004, Page 1771
A comparison of estrogen receptor-alpha immunoreactivity in the arcuate hypothalamus of young and middle-aged C57BL6 female mice;
Yaghmaie F, Garan SA, Massaro M, Timiras PS;
Experimental Gerontology, Volume 38 (2003), Issues 1-2, Page 220
Creating Three-Dimensional Neuronal Maps of the Mouse Hypothalamus Using an Automated Imaging Microscope System;
Garan SA, Neudorf J, Tonkin J, McCook LR, Timiras PS.;
Experimental Gerontology, Volume 35 numbers 9-10, December 2000, page 1421
Automated Imaging Microscope System;
Jason Neudorf and Steven A. Garan;
Linux Journal 2000, Issue 70, Februrary, Page 32-35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I am not well versed on his topic but it appears there was a similar unrest in 18th century I think a good merging is sorely needed here | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
The Silver Devastation
A ""{{prod}}"" template has been added to the article The Silver Devastation, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 1 Talk/ " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This is not a forum. If no explanation is given by the writers, then asking the question here is pointless. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Message
Is there a way to PM you about an issue involving an editor and sockpuppeting that I noticed? I don't want to start posting my issue here so that they or anyone else can see. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ANI
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
RE ban
As the problems of the original arb case are still ongoing, • Talk • " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Why?
I would like to see some explanation of the multi-faceted rationales for this rather statist mandate, rather unprecedented in the technology history of the USA because it allows for absolutely no choice on the part of consumers/users. The introduction cited political, economic issues, there are also military issues perhaps, and the capability of the technology involved all hint at a series of reasons that are not clear in everything I've read on the topic. Am I the only one confused on this issue? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Coloring
Could someone color the obstacle diagrams,like in the Sasuke article?1 (talk)(Work)(?) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sorry about that tried to revert at same time | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Nunn the gun
A tag has been placed on Nunn the gun, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. (talk • contribs) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Blocked.
Blocked.
I was told by the Contact Wikipedia page that one was to either e-mail the administrator who blocked them or contact them on their talk page.
While I do not have an IRC channel, I figured contacting here would be the best way. I am the user currently in charge of the IP address 4.249.108.83, which you blocked. I'm not sure why it was blocked, as I've only used Wikipedia to read entries. The only entry I ever edited was one on Air Force One, and that was to change a mistake of the location of Andrews Air Force Base. As for that edit, it is because I live near the base myself and know the area well. If this is the reason for my banning, then I would say you're two years behind schedule.
I haven't hurt anyone, and I'm not around the Internet nearly enough to edit any pages, so giving myself my own login wouldn't be necessary.
I would appreciate if someone resolved the matter of my blocking, please.
Regards,
K.I. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
.This page is automatically archived by . Click here for a list of archives | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
And your point regarding the main issue here is what, Binksternet?? I happen to think the opening statement in the lead is too ""busy,"" but if we are going to keep its current structure then ""what it classifies as hate groups"" is fine. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No, I have three meat puppets vandalizing my careful contributions. That will be reported. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Yeah why dont you do the world a favor and pull your lip over your head... and swallow | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Just discovered that all the articles are being redirect except Alan Shefman's article
how do you redirect? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
hi,idiot, why are you delate my talking, just come out say | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Peer Review
While a peer review would help, I doubt that the article would pass a GAN. It simply isn't there yet. The unsourced information would definitely be pointed out. I think a more appropriate move would to get it listed into the proper projects and then have it assessed. Then, after that. I think a GAN would be a wonderful move. Speak Page | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I understood the articles to be newspaper reports and as I didn't see them on the page I simply added a very neutral informative sentence. As far as I can see you are not disputing the sentence so why on earth are you hassling me here? You appear to be assuming bad faith where none exists and your comments as such appear to be a direct attack on me. Please leave it there! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
But nobody heard her say that word. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
YES. I understand.
YES, YES, YES | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
What do the three edits Feb. 24 have to do with the sock puppetry investigation of COI from 2006 and early 2007? This all seems like a big stretch to formulate a grand conspiracy theory where there isn't any. Editors were aware of the COI back when it happened (years ago) and dealt with it. The article is edited and watched closely now.
Are the only recent edits those three attempted additions to the Barack Obama article? Hardly a high crime it seems to me. What you're really upset about is that someone did an unfavorable (but accurate) story about how all attempts to include any mention of controversies or criticisms in the Obama article were reverted. News flash, many of us have had the exact same experience this editor had. If we block users for editing under ""false pretenses"" so be it, but lots of editors post on other sites about their experiences here. This hardly seems like some grand scheme to bring Wikipedia to its knees.
This check user investigation, however, and the AfD certainly look like an overeaction that only adds fuel to the fire. Klein said he asked someone to make the edits to see what would happen. He reported on the experience and those he witnessed of other attempts to edit the page that are easily viewed through the history. This hardly seems like something worth making a federal case over. The only mischaracterization is yours: ""under false pretenses to incite a block and, through off-wiki agitation, bring disrepute on the project and trigger a major meltdown on the Obama page."" The fact is the editor in question arranged for an attempt to make a reasonable edit to grotesquely biased article and reported on the experience. That it's not favorable to Wikipedia is certainly cause for reflection and consideration of how we can improve our handling of issues like this in the future. I know when something messed up is noted on another site and people here are made aware of it there's usually an effort to fix it. That happened in this case, but the guardians of the Obama page made sure nothing changed. So be it. If it upsets and embarasses you as it does me, do something to fix it. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I agree with SH, that sort of 'improvement' should be illegal! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Response
So I'm sure you're a really nice guy, but it looks like you're adding the tags not because of the the article needing a cleanup and reorganizing but just because the color scheme of the column boxes are not the color scheme of original boxes and are matching the Roc Nation colors and of the logo.
That is just plain out bias it not my fault that other people do not do this when creating a record label studio album discography, which they can and you have not seen one with a color scheme on them. All I have done is put the 3 basic colors Black, Red and White of Roc Nation on a original Wikipedia column to distinguish it from other record label albums discography and the other names of the artists that are on the article, because the article would grow as those and more artist release more studio albums and mixtapes, which makes it appropriate and not inappropriate as you have stated for you reason of adding cleanup/reorganize tags. Once again all I did is add 3 basic colors to the original columns Black, Red and White which anybody can do on any other record label discographies on Wikipedia, but I may have been the first to do this new color scheme styling of a record label studio album discography that does not mean you just add tags that are not meant to be on a specific article that is formatted, organized and written like any other record label albums discographies on Wikipedia and is fully verified.
There is no Wikipedia rule that says this is not justified for a record label studio album discography except for you , I'm sure you're a really nice guy, but this just plain bias, which Wikipedia does not condone from established editors or administrators. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
haha it is soo funny
and thats why im keeping it on the page. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
What does the ""in two weeks"" refer to, Ari? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Blocked indef. — • Talk • " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
ha I thought you knew it was me! i guess logging in would make it more clear, though its not tantamount to brave public speech if i use a name like limpdaddy. anyway, i was not gaming you into 3R block and got one myself after reverting bigdaddys ""clarification"". thanks for the colon advice, I thought there would be someway to do it once per edit.
about reverts, not every revert is POV, but for nearly every post/revert pair there will be one party that sees the action as POV. if you're looking for them they are easy to find.
re: your editing history, if i'm not mistaken, you continued to remove references to bill maher making jokes about their sexual relations, but leave those about their being ""friends""." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"==DJ Sammy==
Can I please suggest you read Wikipedia:Five pillars before proceeding further. You need to understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia - NOT a fan site, blog or a ""We love Sammy"" exercise. You are in real danger of having all your edits reverted if you do not comply with some of Wikipedia's basic philosophies. Perhaps the easiest to understand is that this is not the place to put your personal viewpoints (See Wikipedia:Neutral point of view), and that edits are expected to include a cited source (see Wikipedia:Verifiability). Thank you,
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(I've already discussed WarriorsPride6565 here and elsewhere.) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The word Knave is synonmyous with Jack or Journeyman. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I went ahead and shortened the stuff on abortion and euthanasia. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
", 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I quote from WP:NPOV""None of the views should be given undue weight or asserted as being judged as ""the truth"", in order that the various significant published viewpoints are made accessible to the reader, not just the most popular one. It should also not be asserted that the most popular view, or some sort of intermediate view among the different views, is the correct one to the extent that other views are mentioned only pejoratively. Readers should be allowed to form their own opinions.""
Well it is fairly obvious that there is a different viewpoint than from the official story.. and quickly it is growing to not be a minority. If you looked there is not so many hundreds of ""conspiracy theories"" anymore.. There has been research done and then there's plain facts that help bring this POV to light. It is simply amazing that in world history, no steel structure building has succumbed to fire. Yet we have 3 buildings destruct in virtually freefall in their own footprint due to ""Fire"". It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out that something is wrong there. Why are you admins collectively avoiding such reality?
07:53" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
HELLO AGAIN
im glad you are here on wikipedia, gives me something to do. i really enjoy doing this, o by the way you should recomend wikipedia to unblock my friends, cattygirl, spicymomma, numbered69, pharmacyboy. i know they would really appreciate it, you will too, i know it, otherwise there are other measures that we can take if it does not happen. And by the way recomend would mean unblock them ASAT, as soon as tommorow. hope that is clear enough for you, it best be done soon. hope school goes good for you, i have seen you in school a couple of times so just watch your back. things can go wrong when someone knows who you are but you dont know who they are. watch out please, i wouldnt want to have to do something because of something stupid you did. take care raise that grade up and you will hear from me again. o and feel really free to express yourself on my pages, i would love to hear from you.
poppylocks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Actually, Paul was sued in 2007 for using the Jefferson Starship name for a Microsfot Commercial by Bill Thompson (the manager of the old band) so at least one person involved previously didn't think it was the same band. Also, the Jeff Tamarkin book, about the only definitive book about all the Airplane / Starship incarnations published so far, does not consider the 1992 incarnation as the same band. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY! from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE
Wishing a very Happy First Edit Day!
Have a fantastic day!
From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
where is his bio ? wife, 3 kids, sis, mom, dad ?
How come his bio doesnt mention his wife, 3 kid, sis mom or dad? That info goes in bio right? 70.108.92.126 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"Welcome!
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! BE GOOD! plane
Your POV
Dear Nlitement,
Unfortunately your point of view is not correct. I won't say it is hypocrisy though, it might be rude...
I am not, but you are, comparing these two incidents... What I am saying is in these two cases Europian has different standards. I cannot see what is hard for you to see in this? By the way I am not supporting what has happened in some muslim countries. That is wrong too. I do not have double standars...
AfD for Firearms (computer game)
Please consider removing your AfD request for the firearms computer game. It's a highly notable mod: It won PC Gamer's mod of the year, was released on CD from valve, and at one point in time was the #3 most played halflife mod (before DoD came out, and that pushed it back to #4). It's been around for years. I notice from your user page you state you are only 13 years old. Firearms would have been largely before your time. Please see forums.worldatwarmod.com and check the Firearms section for evidence of notability. Thanks. SWATJester Ready Aim Fire!
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/True Combat: Elite
As per your comments here, it's obvious you flooded AfD with several mod articles as retaliation for your article being nominated. This is unnacceptable behavior, and if you continue to show such aggression, you may be blocked in the future.
Call it what you want, the fact is you basically admit to doing it to prove a point in SEVERAL places. Whatever your reasoning for it is, the plain fact is that its against wikipedia policy, no matter how you sugercoat it.
Hi
I would like to ask one person who voted on True Combat: Elite deleting. Do you even play games? Have you even heard about the mod? Have you checked anything about it? Have you seen my phat and big comment where I mentioned a lot of obvious reasons for notability. You don't have to answer. I know the answer. [talk]
Since I voted, further evidence of notability has been added so I have changed to a keep vote.
On the same subject, the article was kept per the afd, but you might want to establish the notability further on the article itself (by including some references to it on notable sites etc.) so that someone else won't just nominate it again in a few weeks. Thanks. -
Grand Theft Auto 3+ font
Hi, I read over your edit summary on the Grand Theft Auto IV page. I think I know what font you were talking. It is the ""Pricedown"" TrueType font by Ray Larabie, right? They're the same because Ray Larabie is a former employee of Take-Two Games/Rockstar Games. I have the font and tried to recreate the Grand Theft Auto logo. ;-P
Thank you f | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Hello there, I haven't contacted any other users, but I think this is how I supposed to do it; correct me if wrong. I got Jounin from the Japanese version of Naruto. Jounin is the official spelling. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
So, how are WE interpreting it? Your response above is just that, YOUR response. It doesn't solve the problem that the hyperlink in the article takes us to the disambiguation page, which could lead readers anywhere. Your opinion is helpful, but what does the rest of our editorship think? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Template talk:Campaignbox Chinese Civil War
I just noticed the talk page today. I replied to it, and please correct me if I'm wrong. AQu01rius ( | Talk | Websites) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Caspian, I am not about to get into yet another drawn out argument with you. Show me an unbiased citation proving (not alleging) who ordered the killing please. I have no desire to distort facts. On a side note, I would be happy if we could remain civil even when we disagree about an edit, please don't say things such as ""here is not a right place for you"" in relation to my editing of wikipedia, there is no need for such a comment, the only possible outcome is that it will cause offence. thanks friend, " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ellery (duo)
I have added my reasons for this entry using guidelines from Wikipedia:Notability (music) - see Talk:Ellery (duo) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Image copyright problem with Image:Fir on Trail.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Fir on Trail.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.
Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. '''''' | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
... and well, it's not like ""your propaganda"" will be enough, but a few tens of people like you, self confident, with access to the new media, and constantly repeating the mantra, can make it..." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
It should be named as ""Navarre"", the English term is Navarre, not ""Navarra"". 80.58.205.42 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
It was in response to a question that I asked in replying to a post by AFD hero. Although I did not ask the question specifically of Slowart I would have thought that just providing an asked-for diff was pretty much what Arbcom had in mind when they allowed the banned editors to respond. If you are now interpreting things more strictly that is fine with me.
You might like to look at the link yourself and see if you can work out exactly who suggested 'Tree shaping' and on what basis. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
To be quite clear, I wasn't purporting 'good faith' to be the rationale for the blocks. Instead, it describes the rationale for the edits. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 Nephi 11:13, 1 Nephi 12:23, 1 Nephi 13:15, 2 Nephi 5:21, Alma 3:6, Mormon 5:15, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Your submission at AfC Chansonetta Stanley Emmons was accepted
Chansonetta Stanley Emmons, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. .
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
January 2008 (UTC)
I am simply pointing out the areas upon which serious discussions are based and the policy prohibiting voting. I am also not the only user saying that different policy is not being met by the arguments. 00:37, 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Why don't you do it? 24.68.148.215 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:Downers Grove – Main Street (Metra) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sorry - in re-reading my edit summary I can see why you are confused - I worded it poorly. What I meant to say was that I agreed with the IP user's deletion, because that paragraph is unsourced, appeared to be a personal account thus violating COI policy, and in any case represented an anecdote of no general interest. So, my edit summary was meant to be a comment on the passage that had been deleted, not your restoration of it. Should I do something to clarify? I would not agree with restoring that deletion without some justification. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
== How rude. I've read that article, and most of the descriptions are barely fitting how I feel right now. I do not fake/induce injuries and I've never held an inordinate fascination with hospitals. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Service award
Hello. I noticed you list yourself as a Senior Editor III, which requires both 5 years of service and 33,000 edits. X!'s counter, however, reports that you only have a little over 25,000 edits. In the grand scheme of things, this isn't a big deal, but since awards are one of the few means of positive reinforcement we have here on Wikipedia, I feel it important we uphold their integrity. Perhaps you were not aware that meeting both the tenure and edit count requirements are required to obtain these awards? Or maybe you are counting edits from another account? Whatever the case, these awards are self-regulated, so I just wanted to bring the issue to your attention. Thanks for your continued service to the 'pedia. —'''''''''' talk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
You are continuing to misrepresent my original objection. My objection was NOT that 'he didn't respond in 8 hours', or anything like that. (You portrayed that as my objection, though!). Instead, I objected that Dodo wasn't addressing MY ACTUAL OBJECTIONS. Other than his 'driveby deletions', and a template or two, he DIDN'T respond to my complaints. Not only did he not address my objections within a day (as you implied my original complaint was), he didn't even EVENTUALLY address my objections! Irresponsibly, and probably maliciously, you tried to make me look like 'the bad guy' for objecting to Dodo's repeated rapid deletions without waiting for consensus, etc.
Dodo was trying to act on the theory, 'if somebody does ANYTHING even arguably criticizable, I can slap him down repeatedly by deleting his edits, without waiting for any sort of consensus, etc.' (Evidently, that is your position as well.) I say, ""No!"". Dodo never, in detail, responded to my repeated and DETAILED complaints of his behavior. Is the reason that 'he is busy'? Well, if he's SO BUSY,
why did he have enough time to repeatedly delete my posts? Doesn't make sense, does it? The answer is quite simple: Dodo (and, I suspect, many other self-appointed 'Info-Nazi's' ALWAYS have time to slap down other users (that's EASY, and takes little time!), but they DON'T have enough time to actually defend their own actions when challenged! Dodo (and many others) amount to semi-professional BUSYBODIES who strut their stuff by interfering with others' use of WP. Stop it.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Your threat
To clarify: My edit summary, ""talk page fascism,"" was not a personal attack. It was, (and is) a statement of my concern about peremptory actions taken by you on the Michael Ignatieff talk page. It was a warning to all who read it. I do not appreciate you threatening me with a block. Your blood seems to be running hot. Be careful. Be civil. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
He's just left-handed, and left-handed people can make silly things happen! ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Old Jim does seem to blame the Israelis for a lot of things. I saw you on Press TV today - owned and operated by the Iranian Govt for goodness sake. If you read this Jimbo, could you give us some facts to back up your crazy theories? | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits