text
stringlengths 6
5k
| racial_origin
int64 0
3
| gender_sex
int64 0
3
| religion
int64 0
3
| ability
int64 0
3
| violence
int64 0
3
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ah Yahel very honest of you to remove my comments without specifying who you are, what exact objection you have, and what authority you have to remove my comments as a personal attack, I am reverting and will only remove these comments mself if you AND another editor can give a reason why my comments are more ofeensive than defensive of user: Bless Sins, and how your comments have not been any more offensive on this page than mine.86.150.147.133 user: R.G.P.A I am replacing my comments below:
Whether you think islam is false or not is irrelevant, as a christian I might be nclined to think that Judaism and Islam are 'false', you say that we 'have' to believe islam is false because I am a Christian, no this is not the case, depending on what you mean by 'false'. Certainly I do not follow all the teaching of the Quran, but there are many good suggestions about how to live ones life in the Quran, some of which also exist in christianity, some of which dont, so I dont think islam is 'false'. You may think islam is false, whats to stop me turning around and saying to you Judaism is false? I could probably give you a hell of a theological argument for saying why Judaism is false,. but I do not believe it is completly false, and at the end of the day whatever argument I may provide whether a religion is 'false' or not is merely a biased opion. So what if Bless sins may have a pro-msulim leabing, we all have bias in our approach, and in fact I would say that your bais against islam is far more agressive and evident than that of Bless sin's pro-islam bias. Dont pretend you are some omniscient perfect observer, becase as your edits show that would be a clear and arrogant lie to yourself, and my only advice to you is to refrain from being hypocritical.86.150.147.133 User: R.G.P.A
- After looking at your userpage you also seem to have articles related to islam in your sites, just as Bless Sins does, and as your pathetically disguised bais shows, you are being nothing more than a simple hypocrit to attack Bless Sins for doing the same thing you do.86.150.147.133 User: R.G.P.A
End86.150.147.133 User: R.G.P.A | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
Thanks ==
Thanks for the welcome Arun!
== | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
That only applies to the USA. Recipes vary regionally. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
""Expecting you"" Contribs " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
In my view it's all about politcal opinion, the likes of Snowded have no other aim but to attack the United Kingdom, push for POV terminology and accuse editors they dislike of various wrongdoings. A quick look at your userpage Snowded explains your motives clearly. A Welsh nationalist, with a dislike for the union and any union terminology, whose aim is to support your gaelic brothers across the irish sea in their noble endeavor to kick the British occupiers out of Ireland back to Britain. | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Reply to request: As an editor (which you are) you are encouraged to be bold and fix it yourself. You should feel free to choose the phrasing you feel is best, and don't be too surprised if another editor later makes changes. That is the nature of a collaboratively edited encyclopedia. If you want to gain the consensus of other editors, it is better to ask this sort of question on the article's talk page rather than on a User talk page. You will get the attention of more interested parties there. — (Talk) (Contrib) — " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"I am not surprised to find Zoticogrillo here. Dude the Doctor of ""Laws"" and the Doctor of ""Law"" are two different degrees and translation from Latin to English. Don't take my word call the ABA. Moron
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Under no circumstances should this discussion be deleted, let it remain as a testament to the stupidity of the vocal few and so Wikipedians know who the anti-Semites are at the Wiki. | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
Editors in chief have that name because they are in charge. QED. - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Revised Michael Birkin article's whereabouts
Hi User:Tone:
I moved the article to here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_talk:Herve49727/Michael_Birkin_(businessman).
Thank you for your consideration. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
which was involved in this incident | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
{{unblock|That is absolutely false. I absolutely did not ""make a personal attack"" on you. Dishonestly claiming a false pretext to block me is a reprehensible abuse of your authority. Since the stated reason for this one-week block is wholly spurious, absolutely false, I demand to be unblocked immediately.
Not only did I never make any ""personal attack"" against you, admins will observe that I actually thanked and praised you for intervening, which I also did in my private email message to you. This pretext for a one week block is absolutely spurious. You're making a minor disagreement on a tangential point on the Talk page into something personal and abusing your authority.
As for your comments on the Talk page:
I never accused you of making ad hominem arguments, I asked you to calm down WP:DISENGAGE.
I was never not ""cool"" to begin with, so it's unnecessary to tell me to ""calm down"", ""cool down"", etc. Moreover, you said to me: ""I see some efforts being made to try to work out the differences, they will not be worked out if you resolve to not negotiate and dig in your heels. Respectful discussion free of attacks is the best way to do this ..."" This implies I had made ""attacks"" on people in lieu of trying to negotiate a solution reasonably. But like I said, and as you seem to now acknowledge, I never employed any ad hominem arguments (i.e., ""attacks""). Moreover, any administrator can go to the Talk page and see for themselves that I've gone to extraordinary lengths to negotiate a reasonable solution with other editors.
You can be right about something and still be wrong META:DBAD.
I don't know what it is you think I am ""right about"" but still ""wrong"" about. But you seem to be implying I'm being a ""dick"". I challenge you to present any quotes from me evidencing your implication that I've been a ""dick"", i.e. by making ""personal attacks"". You'll find you are unable to do so.
You have engaged in a level of rhetoric that has created a hostile atmosphere (WP:CIVIL), you refuse to relent from your positions and you attack the positions of others with walls of text and barbs (WP:DBF). You've had editors ask you to calm down and you've had admins ask you to calm down and yet you've attacked anyone who has asked you to WP:NOTTHEM.
Again, this is a false characterization. Every response of mine to others arguments has been to address the facts and logic of their arguments, as I am doing here with you. I have in no way been uncivil either with you or the other editors engaged on the Talk page. I have discussed diverging views and made numerous concessions to others on the Talk page in order to come to a consensus. My replies to others on their positions have consisted of substantive responses on points of fact and logic, never ""personal attacks"" or ""barbs"" (""walls of text"" might apply, as I've gone to extraordinary length to outline my own views and to support my own arguments with facts and logic).
# ""Unhelpful"" is not a word.
Thanks for the correction. I'll reiterate: ""Kindly quote me where I ever employed any ad hominem arguments, as opposed to addressing the facts and logic of the argument(s) put forth. You'll find, Wgfinley, you're unable to do so. So kindly refrain from suggesting otherwise. It's not helpful. Cheers.""
Incidentally, it is apparently this comment you here regard as a ""personal attack"" against you. Any other admin can see for themselves I did not attack you here. On the contrary, I merely observed here that you had characterized ME as making ""attacks"", when I had never done so. You're making this personal and abusing your authority.
This is the first thing you posted immediately after your previous ban expired (WP:NAM) followed by open questioning of your ban even being valid, it appears you need more time to cool down, 7 days should do.
You have not substantively addressed even a single point in my argument why my previous ban was wrongful. Yet you block me further on an even more spurious pretext this time an absolutely false allegation that I attacked you personally. Other admins can confirm I never once did so.
If you come back from this block and engage in more vitriol here again I'll have no choice but to take further sanctions and ban you from editing or discussion on this article per WP:GS.
On your further mischaracterization of any of my remarks of mine as ""vitriol"", see above.
I would request that whatever admin makes a decision on this that you please substantively address my points here. The stated reason for my being blocked for 1 week is that I made a ""personal attack"" on Wgfinley. Admins will find that I have never once done so. This block is therefore inappropriate and an abuse of authority. As such, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Well, if the LEA is Wigan, then the school is in Greater Manchester, period. I understand that Orrell, Greater Manchester is in... Greater Manchester. It would actually be on the GM/Merseyside border too AFAICT. | Talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
":We actually don't have an issue with users who have been blocked solely because of their username registering and using new accounts provided they comply with Wikipedia's rules. However, alternate accounts editing in a way contrary to policy are referred to as sockpuppets and are blocked accordingly. As a general rule (Wikipedia administrators follow the spirit of the rules, not the letter) admins will not consider unblock requests from sockpuppet accounts, especially if the user is still belligerent.
My suggestion is to go to your original account, use to request an unblock to change your original account's username. In any case, you will need to be more civil before anyone will consider an unblock. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"A lot of people still pronounce it as ""Conway"" however. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
": See Wikipedia:Administrators#Exceptional_circumstances. Clear violations of WP:BLP are not covered by 3RR.
A blog post by ""Tyler Durden"" (that's a fictional character) that reads ""she lied again, something which appears to have been a recurring pattern for this 31-year-old "" is not an acceptable source under any circumstances.
And I do not have any sort of conflict of interest here. | talk
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Lincoln Caplan (now working in a non-profit) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
You do not own a page because it happens to be related to you. You especially do not own its talk page. You deleted EVERYTHING Hipocrite said, not just statements that could be seen as attacking. By the ""personal attacks"" you made, I refer to ""cretin"" and ""idiot"". And yes, I can block you if you continue to vandalize by deleting comments, or file a request for comment or arbitration if you continue to be incivil. Factual inaccuracy is no excuse for incivility and personal attacks. ~~ '''''' (t/c) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
(edit conflic) I don't quite understand why you and Madcoverboy are after this article. I've created it following a request, and provided sources for it (the Interactive Policy Making Initiative is mentioned in the Register source). I just can't see what harm it can do, Madcoverboy said it was written like an ad, but how can that be? This software is developed internally by the EU and is not on sale, so why would anybody want to advertise it? Then you've nominatted it saying it's a non-notable website or company, but it's none of this - it's a software. In other word, the article is not spam, not ad, there's no COI, and it was requested by another person (proof that some people want to know what it is about). So I'm sorry, but I'll keep removing the deletion tags - I suggest you bring the article to an AFD if you so badly want to see it deleted. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
What rubbish:Coren, you are basically saying - 'On the basis that you must have never seen this done before, and the length of time you have been here, I have concluded that, without any evidence at all, you were stalking another editor, by making a single edit.' As for you chillum, just don't insult my intelligence, and do not undo the below unblock request. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
User:Iblardi wrote: ""Yet in the above list, I do not see instances of entire words being copied from right to left.""
Numerous examples of this can be seen in Wutz, F. (1925). Die Transkriptionen von der Septuaginta bis zu Hieronymus, Berlin/Stuttgart/Leipzig.
Had User:Iblardi bothered to study first what he is disingenuously attacking he would have noticed that in F. Carotta, Jesus was Caesar. On the Julian Origin of Christianity, 2005, note 75, p. 370 it says:
""It is also assumed that the Septuagint was transcribed in Greek letters first and was then translated with occasional perceptual errors, amongst them the ones due to the misreading of the direction in which various words were to be read (cf. Wutz (1925). Apart from the Septuagint, transcriptions of Hebrew texts are contained in the writings of Flavius Josephus, Origenes, Eusebius, Epiphanes, Aquila, Symmachus and Theodotion. For the heterographical use of the Aramaic in the Persian cf. Segert (1990), 1.7.6. So it is conceivable that a copyist has taken the name Antonius to be a reversed, heterographically inserted Simona and that he has ‘corrected’ the supposed mistake."" — " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
And not a half bad page at that! You're getting the hang of it -) 22:09, 25 Mar 2004 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
The name used is for the languages spoken within Iran, which is the South Azeri dialect written in the modified Arabic alphabet. Thus, it is inconsequential how the language/alphabet of another country uses such a term. For example, if the term Iran was used different in say the Persian of Afghanistan, it is inconsequential for an article on Iran. In Iran no one writes: ""Güney"" with such an alphabet in the Azeri publications there (say newspapers). Because first of all, they use the modified Arabic alphabet and second, it is politically charged. Second, the same region (a good portion of it like all of Western Azerbaijan) is called by Kurdish nationalists as ""Eastern Kurdistan"". For example, in the Northern Federal region of Kurdish Iraq, they use East Kurdistan for all of West Azerbaijan with their own alphabet. However, this does not mean we put ""Eastern Kurdistan"" in say the article West Azerbaijan for Kurdish language or here. Thus what matters is mainstream and official publications within Iranian Azerbaijan, and even the term ""Güney"" is not used that much as the word ""Jonub"" is used for ""South"" more often then ""Güney"". Also, please do not edit war, given the fact that your block was just lifted by adding controversial items. " | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You have my sympathy. Stan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Your role as copyright enforcer
You removed a video link I posted to the [Jimmy Rushing] entry, insinuating, but offering no evidence, that it the posted video violated copyright. Google determines what videos violate copyright on YouTube, and I fail to see why you are in a better position to know than Google is, unless you are the copyright holder. Google removes videos when a valid claim of copyright violation is made, and before that there is no assumption (and certainly no proof) that the video violates copyright. You have not demonstrated that you have special copyright expertise, and even that would not give you special knowledge about a given video. You merely draw you own conclusions, which override those of Google, and do as you wish. If I can't know if a video violates copyright, how can you know? And if you do not have such factual knowledge, why do you assume a violation, and the right to delete a link? Please explain any knowledge you have that the video in this instance violates copyright. If you do not have that factual knowledge, please explain why you have the right to act as if it does violate copyright. Do you know of any legal precedent for holding a person or entity liable for linking to a copyrighted item without knowledge that there is a copyright violation? According to the Digital Media Law Project, ""As long as you do not know that a work infringes someone's copyright, then you cannot be held liable for contributory infringement for directing users to that work."" The mere mention of the video being available from Rhino which has now apparently allowed the video to go out of print is not proof of copyright ownership. If one exists, the copyright might have been leased to Rhino, or there may be no copyright, or one that permits a YouTube posting. Thanks. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
death to the infidel
whoever that may be | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
I see no reason to think that these dead links are vandalism. There are indeed US schools that ban hugs, and I don't doubt that there are schools where the students have protested. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
on wikia
on the wikia called future there is a saving of this page if users delete the page on wikipedia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Yes, that's an excellent fair use rationale. If you plan to reasonably (and, preferably, provably) claim that the image has been produced for promotional purposes, you might review the text of which may save you much typing. The particular images I spotted were the ones in Motorized bicycle, where I think you also need to replace the very old image with one of the PD tags, probably . -talk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Get real! What is the diff between a man and a woman? Is that a SEXIST question? | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hey M(asturbator)O(f)L(ies)O(r)B(rainsick)O(pinions)
I see, such Idiots like you never give up! Fortunately I know that you are not a Pole, but a f... bastard who wants to destroy the reputation of every real Pole who has some intelligence! | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Name
SIONICS is an acronym for the full company name. It qualifies to be all-caps. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
''''Support attack. Stabbings - NO. it is a dreadful word, has no purpose. 206.174.72.112 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
February 2009
(aeiou) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
KIDS, WANT TO GET MOLESTED THROUGH YOUR COMPUTER SCREEN, IT FEELS REALLY GOOD, ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS READ THIS ARTICLE ON WIKIPEDIA, AND MAGICALLY, JIMBO WALES'S HAND WILL APPEAR AND RUB YOUR PENIS!!!
BAN me please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I am nothing but a fat, evil, useless troll and vandal with a 1-inch long penis. | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
"
Better version by N419. As an European, i felt some need to write it bold in this topic. ""As of 2009"" removed, as readers may think in a first look this is actual info. And its not needed in the introduction. And no definition found for ""most widely flown"". Not sure enough what this means for everybody.
Strong support for N419BH, that if comparisons are made, the concurrent pair should be recognized. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I don't think that a list of practical suggestions culled from the Material is a suitable subject for an encyclopedia. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"== List of constituencies ==
The list of constituencies given, at present, by this article looks somewhat suspect. It does not agree with info in ""Assembly Member (Welsh Assembly)"". ." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Oh, no problem. Sorry if I came off a bit harsh, it was around 2 in the morning when I wrote that. I also don't know how to wiki talk yet, so excuse me posting here again. Thanks for the help, I wanna try to improve more articles. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I really cannot understand why you think it was important for the sentence to be that way - I was not resisting you. I asked for sources, and you provided them. I have made the change you suggested, and added the NEJM reference. Hopefully, that will help prevent it from being reverted. Sorry I did not pay attention to the fact that you're not yet able to be bold - it was not meant to add to your frustration. Nice suggestion, and I'm glad you were persistent. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
MfD nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David E Woodley
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David E Woodley, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David E Woodley and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David E Woodley during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
He's a sock of an indefinitely blocked user (verified by both myself and ), there is nothing much else to add. –MuZemike | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
heh , if you thought it was too much , you could have just removed that comment not my whole argument.
point taken though
86.123.168.47 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
on google did anything come up? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
One Slate article suggests it is fiction, while another suggests it is (an alleged) fact. If even the editors at this one reliable source can't keep their own ducks in a row, there's not much hope for us. Regardless, WP:V not WP:TRUTH is our standard. talk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Yeah, I'm sorry for your brother's loss, but I was just heading here to say the same thing as these two cats. Information like thatdeclaring a subject deadreally must have a source. Take a brief read through WP:BLP if you get the chance. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Welcome!
Hello, Jay2980, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
But it doesn't change my feelings about the deletion. At the moment of decision, my estimation was that the deletion was valid. I said so at the DRV. I'll ask that the page be userified tonight but I'm not really interested in posting an update to that DRV. If you want to or another editor wants to, feel free to link this talk page in an update. but I feel pretty tentative about the whole thing myself. I'll make and defend a remade article with that source in it, but if DRV is about the process then my assessment of the process is unchanged. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Of course not, as any experienced admin would know there is no conceivable way that my remarks warranted a block whereas your poor conduct and language should have resulted in the same for you. / (talk) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Check out this page Dunc, Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jas, you'll find it very amusing. It looks like Jason gave the wrong URL to all his supporters. Every edit is a one off user. How do you imagine they found this page? LOL (Talk) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"HI DEB! please help me. idk why you lyk deleted my article it was lyk so good. y ru doin dat? not very nice bby gurl. anyways idk if this is the write spot to put this but i totally am listening to this eminem song and he yells ""f**k you debbie!"" it just reminded me of you so i decided to leave you a comment! have a good new years, let me know if you get this... you probably will since you delete articles 24/7 anyways MUCH LUV,
~*~ CHARLI ~*~
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Piss off, she is an ignorant bitch. | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Sources
Any additonal sources with repect to atmospheric circulation would be appreciated. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I dont know how to message u without disrupting your page but im here to let u know that the page u mentioned is flawed. That leverne person is not a woman its a man. No matter what changes someone goes through they will be whatever gender they were created and no one is created transgender. So u keep on being ignorant but ""she"" is not a she and I will not address him as ""she""" | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Then answer my question
why | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Name Etymology
Does anyone have information on the etymology of the name Peru? If so it would be a good addition. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Second Coming
So I can't even undo my own edits? ~) Let it stand. Maybe it is an appropriate comment on the process through the mood it conveys, even if the meaning is obscure. I will stay out of the ArbCom discussion. I find these squabbles futile and childish. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bitch shut your ass up, it's not bogus Vince is the majority owner, and yes through the class b shares it became Family owned and controled, that's why it's considered Family owned, and the only reason I haven't changed it back to McMahon Family, is because Wikipedia said I'm in a edit war, take yo ass back to editing something else give been editing WWE and Stephanie McMahon things for 2 years and yo stupid ass is the only one who has said something about my editing | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Wikipedia is written collaboratively by volunteers from all around the world. Visitors do not need specialised qualifications to contribute, since their primary role is to write articles that cover existing knowledge; this means that people of all ages and cultural and social backgrounds can write Wikipedia articles. 2nd and 3rd paragraph. It would be great however if a gynecologist were to contribute. this may be falsely assuming that they have not. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
From what I see, not care that I was completely unable to file the complaint at the time. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Who are you to determine fact from fiction? The general public considers the NAACP and ADL to be civil rights organizations. David Duke is regarded as a racist by most and even the US Government has investigated his actions as a domestic terrorist along with federal tax evasion. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
As I asked, did you actually READ the entire article? Apparently not. Yours is a hair trigger that gets good people killed. Seen it in combat as a merc. That's why I shall staunchly defend myself and this new article. You seem entirely too old school to be working as an administrator. Let the war begin. . . . | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
"
Oppose. Plainly contrary to practice and a violation of WP:CONSISTENCY. Articles which merely list the ""members"" of an organization like this, with little or no sourced explanatory text about the organization itself, are identified as ""list"" articles. See, for example, List of members of the Baseball Hall of Fame, List of National Four-String Banjo Hall of Fame members, List of members of the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame, List of Water Skiing Hall of Fame Inductees, List of Pro Football Hall of Fame inductees, and List of stars on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. Individual ""Hall of Fame"" articles, in contrast, deal with halls which actually exist as institutions (not simply as names given to lifetime achievement awards) and whose articles have substantive content about the hall itself, beyond the list of members and simple chronological entries. The distinction has not been carefully observed, but that is no reason to further muddy the waters rather than clarify them. Here, the is no actual hall as an institution (unlike the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum in Cooperstown, NY, the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame in Springfield, MA, the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in Cleveland, OH, the National Sprint Car Hall of Fame & Museum in Knoxville, Iowa, the Pro Football Hall of Fame in Canton, IA, or even the National Fresh Water Fishing Hall of Fame in Hayward, WI. Consistency and practice call for retaining the current title (and, it appears, renaming the parallel XRCO Hall of Fame as a list article). " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
What is the best way to properly format these references to ensure the article maintains the high standards we want. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"::Obvious from this unproductive dialogue why I am retiring my user account after 10 years and why I warned Mauna about consequences. If we responded that way we would be sanctioned so it makes the point for me; thanks. Exactly why I abandon my account unapologetic and unmoved by being ""lucky"" there were not more severe sanctions for blowing the whistle. I knew the consequences going in. Silence here IS golden. Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source academically anyway. Goodbye.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Note that the CF-105 article is for all versions. Thanks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Are you familiar with WP:DRNC? From my point of view you seem to be interested in deleting the content at hand, not discussing. How would you summarize the sources? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Census
I noticed you have reverted some population numbers citing no source. While they definitely need a source, the census numbers are available at http://factfinder2.census.gov. Rather than revert to old, outdated information, why not simply add the new source? It's going to be a generic source anyway because the new FactFinder2 site doesn't allow you to bookmark the pages, so you have to find the page you want every time. As for the New Albany article, I'm not sure what the problem is with either source you removed. ""ThisWeekNews"" is a local newspaper website for that area (see Contact Us); it's not like city-data.com or another site that merely collects stories or data from somewhere else, so it seems to fit reliability to me. Interestingly enough, if you go to the bottom of the main page for that site, there is also a link to county-level census data from the Columbus Dispatch. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Please read Talk:Homesickness#Thurber edits. talk to me " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dave, I see, so it's even more obvious that it's not some atheist conspiracy. You obviously know how to do this all, if you warm up to the idea that WP:DUE can be respected, even with a more charitable synopsis. Rennie, I'm suggesting that it is nicer when articles on non-fiction (is this non-fiction?) give summaries of the work before assessing its validity. If my tone indicates that I know what is the best solution and how things should be done around here, then I apologize. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
00:35, Dec 26, 2004 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Thank you kindly
Thank you for your participation on my RfA Thank you for participating at my RfA. I know that you and I have great differences, but I sincerely hope we can continue to work together in ways that ultimately benefit the project. If you ever have concerns with my behavior as an admin, please let me know at any time. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Edits to this page
I noticed that very recently a lot of well-referenced information has been deleted from this article's page. I am wondering what readers might think about restoring some of those deletions - as they provide ""everyday"" contexts, analogies, semantics, examples, etc. that help to better explain the content of the article to a general readership - as the deletions that were made might limit the use of the article to experts in the field? Also, the deletions remove the psychology/social-science aspect of the article. Would anyone be adverse to restoring some of the deleted content? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
know that Salivo sucks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
I think the problem is that the image doesn't exist under that name. The file you've linked to here is actually a red link, which means it doesn't exist. It might be found under a different name or location. This would be why it displayed the file name instead of the image on the article. Try looking for the photo under a different name. Hope this helps. . " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Need proper reliable citations
I appreciate the hardwork of authors in providing references/citations, but most of them dont obey wiki standards like
direct ref to inscriptions and refering to non english sources.
Almost year back I have asked for reliable citations for the claim in this WP that Kota Kings are Kammas,
3 citations have been provided and the funny thing is two of those are famous historian books which
clearly say that Kotas as Rachavaru (kshatriya Rajus) and belong to dhanunjaya gotra. Kota Kings are ancestors to Rajus clans Datla, Dantuluri and Jampana. Plz refer thos two historical books:
1. pg 159-161 from The History of Andhra Country by Yashoda Devi [url=http://books.google.co.in/books?id=-d9IAvFOUHsC&printsec;=frontcover&dq;=The+History+of+Andhra+Country]
2. pg 149,159 from A History of the Early Dynasties of Andhradesa, by B.V Krishna Rao
The two authenticated historical books clearly say Kota Kings as Rachavaru (Rajus), nowhere in the entire two books Kota kings is linked to Kammas.
The third book by Mr. KB Chaudary is unreliable as it is not inline to wiki standards (WP:PRIMARY, WP:OR and WP:SYNTHESIS)
Hence the statements in the article are considered as baseless, and if proper citations are not provided then it shall be cleaned up as per wiki standards.
Request authors/contributors to update with proper citations. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
", 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Perhaps if you would quit removing comments from the Talk Page of WWE Undisputed Championship because you disagree with them? You give false claims of ""vandalism,"" yet there is none per Wikipedia definition. I only place the remarks back in that you delete. In point of fact, YOUR removal of the comments is vandalism as Wikipedia defines the definition. I do have a beef with you, yes. I admit it. I dislike you. You're a douchebag. But I am not ""attacking"" you (as Curps has defined it) when I place the comments back in. I am merely taking care of business in regards to that talk page. Wikipedia user has told you about this, has even told you about this, but yet you continue to not listen to anyone. This is not even an isolated incident you have done this to rec.sport.pro-wrestling on at least five occassions. If you do not like me posting, or have a problem with what I place in, then either put it on the talk page of whatever account or IP I am using or stop whining and shut up. Your pathetic kindergarten-like tactics of running to Curps everytime I do something you don't like is just fucking sad. 20:28" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
"
The edit didn't add anything. One of the books was new but not a major work; the other one was not. All you added besides that was a note about how it was ""relevant for our current age"" which is highly POV. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Alhambra High School
Per the school administration, the information on Ms. Sanchez was false. I have removed it. Thank you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I mean the author of the manga. But, now that I look, the only mention of Tsubasa I can see is in the Pop Culture References section, which states that the beginning of episode 5 is a parody of Captain Tsubasa. The way it reads currently, it is definitely synthesis, but if it's true, there's bound to be a reference (probably in Japanese) confirming it. If none can be found, though, it will eventually have to be removed, and I personally question why it merits mention in the first place anyways - it seems very trivial to me. 「[[Special:Contributions/Dinoguy1000|千？！]]」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Brain crucial
""Because virtually all living organisms require their brain to carry out basic functions"" is simply untrue. Most animals do, but animals make up a small percentage of ""most living organisms."" No plant, protist, fungus, or moneran has a brain to my knowledge. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.121.0.142 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
thanks, but no thanks. i don't have time like some people who spend all their free time on here. i would rather spend my free time to volunteer in real life instead of wasting it on this useless web site full of errors and communist propagandas. | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Wikipedia Education Program Student Survey
Hi! Please take a few minutes to fill out this survey about the Wikipedia Education Program. This is our opportunity to improve the program and resources we provide students, so your feedback and input is integral to our future success. Thank you so much! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This article seems to assume that the reader already has the knowledge that the article should impart. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
help in modifying script
Would it be within your skill set to modify ''¡digame!¿que pasa?'' " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
according to the foreign minister of iran 40% of the iranian people speak turkish! so you are right, first it is one and the same language secondly the stats given in this article are not correct. here is where the minister says it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vc9WJ9U2uHo | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mainly to JTD (i think) - I've just scanned through this discussion stuff having read the article. My initial impression was that this was going very kindly on the British indeed. It is admitted at some point in the discussion that there is a move among Irish historians away from previous over-simplifications of the matter - but isn't this move itself perhpas reactionary? I mean, Irish historians of this or any generation speak for their times, and, for lay readers like myself, the CONTEXT of this estimation of the role of the British imperial adventure in the famine is lost to those who have not studied so carefully the history of the history of the famine. This is, afterall, a general encyclopedia. So please twist the screws a bit.
I won't go editing the article, but some feedback would be appreciated in this regard,
Basically, you're all better historians than myself, but maybe some of your nuances are therefore misplaced here,
(a bit less d'Alembert and more Diderot as it were)
Cheers,
Simon | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Lol, 75% of QLD affected by floods. I guess the news wouldn't possibly sensationalise fact would they. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Caesarean text-type
Hi Stephen. The Caesarean text-type article is currently on WP:AFD. I noticed that you have made some excellent contributions to the Byzantine text-type and Alexandrian text-type articles. The Caesarean article needs some attention to get it to a similar quality level. Unfortunately, I am completely unfamilar with the subject. I hope that you might be able to make some edits to the article, or perhaps point it out to another editor experienced in this subject. Thanks! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
It's been a long time, SummerPhD
Remember me? It's been a while, so you probably don't. My original account was GreenBayPackersfan09. That was my first Wikipedia account (I was 11 year old when I first used that account in 2009, and 14 when i lasted used it in 2012). I'm 17 years old now. I remember when I would used to create a lot of articles, notably on actors who starred in shows that I watched (wizards of waverly place, hannah montana, etc.) We first crossed paths in 2009 (and parted ways in 2012, looking at your last edit on that account userpage), when you nominated a good number of them for deletion (some of them got deleted). If you look at the talk page on the GreenBayPackers account, you'll notice that I actually got vindicated on a good number of the articles you nominated for deletion – a lot of the articles are intact, and in fact have been expanded with pictures, more sources, etc. such as the Harry Shum and Simon Curtis article. I forgot the password to that account, and later used sockpuppets (which I remember you blocked me for, lol). So, how have you been? I've been well. I've started editing a broad multitude of articles productively (I'd argue I was editing productively with that other account as well, and that you were being a tad overzealous). I now edit articles on current events, public figures, politicians, etc. I've learned a lot about Wikipedia's rules, and have made a good number of productive edits. I just stopped by to say it's amazing you're still around. Some people retire after a well. Anyway, just wanted to let you know. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
will, I on the conterary believe that the trem ignorance suites the setuation because it discribes a state of mind that don' have a problem believibg in god if not wanting to but just can't get enough evidence to establish a faith | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deleting non-notable articles and Whinge Wars
I saw your thread at the village pump about deleting non-notable articles and I too have similar concerns. Sorry your article, Whinge Wars, got deleted. I was able to get a copy so I moved it to a safe place that doesn't delete things. You can find it here. I did a little work on the article and updated some stuff. You are welcome to continue working on the article there if you like. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I see the argument of both. Since there is a few schools with the same name. Why not put it as Main Campus Jamaica, New York. It will show the neighborhood and state since showing Queens, NY or Staten Island NY or even Oakdale NY wouldn't be totally fair to all. 74.66.11.10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Many thanks. I know I could have edited it, but I meant that I don't understand all the brackets etc, and how they work, so I thought it safer to ask someone who does! Cheers, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
What you have done to your RfAs of other users
Please stop posting uncivil oppose votes to other users' RfAs. All oppose votes should remain as civil as possible. — ro »
Oh, I see you've done this before, too. It is blockable if you keep this up. — ro » " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
OK re-done without references. Just the 2 words - Son and Man (without even those refs). | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
It's preferable to use links to other Wikipedia articles rather than inline links. Talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Reliable Source
Isn't this a reliable source?> ==Victims==
Emily Hilscher
What the Heck?
I edited something on the ""7 may"" page and you keep deleting it, why?? It is constructive and I don't see how it is ""vandalism"". So I plan to re-edit the page. Thank you for causing others more work and frustration.
Sorry
i haven't remover anthing of the footballers wives episodes page. And i created the page an just wasn't signed in at the time. i accidently lost the series 4 episode summarys when i was writing them. I put them back up straight away.
deleting things...
thanks for clearing the stuff about deletion up. I'm new to deletion... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs) .
ok and where am i supposed to reply to things you say to me? here?
Thanks for the insight. I agree with you. It's much easier to do it back and forth.
how do I change the title of an article? I want to change St. Peter High School (Ottawa) to St. Peter Catholic High School
never mind - sorry i got it now.
Dr. Qwert
I was not aware that the consensus had changed. I was also under the impression that removing recent warnings from one's talk page was also considered vandalism. I'm sorry if I had erred. T
Re
I tagged Byron Long for speedy deletion since it appeared to be entirely unreferenced, which, given the controversial nature of the subject matter, would constitute a serious WP:BLP violation. WP:BLP states that Administrators encountering biographies that are unsourced and controversial in tone, where there is no NPOV version to revert to, should delete the article without discussion (see Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion criterion G10 for more details). Looking through the page history, however, it appears that there actually was a reference for the article, which I have restored.
CSD G10 does use the term ""negative in tone"", which is a somewhat unfortunate choice of words. The more fundamental policy here appears to be Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, which states that ""biographies that are unsourced and controversial in tone"" should be speedily deleted. The underlying issue is not whether we believe that a description of a living person as a ""porn actor"" is actually negative. Rather, for WP:BLP purposes, the issue is whether, if an article incorrectly described someone as a ""porn actor"", such a description would be regarded as defamatory for the purpose of Wikipedia:Libel that is, whether such an incorrect description, if widely believed, might be likely to have a significantly adverse effect on the employment prospects or general reputation of the subject of the article. I would contend that describing someone as a ""porn actor"" is sufficiently ""controversial in tone"" to invoke WP:BLP concerns for the speedy removal and/or deletion of any unreferenced claims of this nature.
Deletion of rain check
Why has this valid article disappeared? Please undelete it, and if you feel it is not up to Wikipedia standards, instead nominate it under WP:AfD, to give others a chance to comment on it and/or improve it. Thanks. –
I understand that it has been transwikied, however it was enough to be its own Wikipedia article, and can be expanded from a stub to a better article by adding information about how rainchecks are handled and processed by stores. (For example, some simply hand the user a piece of paper or carbon copy, others take the customer's information, enter it into a computer, and print a raincheck with a | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
All positive points, no negatives mentioned AT ALL...
This article reads more like a propaganda page than impartial information. It is probably written and maintained by a member of staff at the school, but even so it should give a neutral point of view. For example, the old fashioned grammar school attitudes that the school desperately hangs on to (these include uniforms that haven't changed at all since the 1950's, authoritarian attitudes that are concerned by uniform more than actually making sure the children get a good education, etc, etc...) cause tension between students and teachers, as these obviously dubious values do not fit well into modern society. Just to add to this, the most recent ofstead report strongly emphasises the need for student and teacher relationships to improve. however, because of the senior staff all living in the 1930's, they took this to mean they need to enforce the rules more, with stronger emphasis on uniform and weaker emphasis on educational support; this has simply degraded student's relationships with their teachers (especially the so - called ""senior staff"" who don't even teach but instead spend their time punishing people for petty things - the school even employs a certain member of staff whose job it is to be horrible - ironically she is actually called Mrs Horrod!) even further.
MAYBE SOMEONE COULD INCLUDE THIS IN THE ARTICLE AND MAKE IT LESS HEAVILY BIASED.
Thanks, sorry for the rant.82.153.112.177
All positive points, no negatives mentioned AT ALL...
This article reads more like a propaganda page than impartial information. It is probably written and maintained by a member of staff at the school, but even so it should give a neutral point of view. For example, the old fashioned grammar school attitudes that the school desperately hangs on to (these include uniforms that haven't changed at all since the 1950's, authoritarian attitudes that are concerned by uniform more than actually making sure the children get a good education, etc, etc...) cause tension between students and teachers, as these obviously dubious values do not fit well into modern society. Just to add to this, the most recent ofstead report strongly emphasises the need for student and teacher relationships to improve. however, because of the senior staff all living in the 1930's, they took this to mean they need to enforce the rules more, with stronger emphasis on uniform and weaker emphasis on educational support; this has simply degraded student's relationships with their teachers (especially the so - called ""senior staff"" who don't even teach but instead spend their time punishing people for petty things - the school even employs a certain member of staff whose job it is to be horrible - ironically she is actually called Mrs Horrod!) even further.
MAYBE SOMEONE COULD INCLUDE THIS IN THE ARTICLE AND MAKE IT LESS HEAVILY BIASED.
Thanks, sorry for the rant.82.153.112.177
All positive points, no negatives mentioned AT ALL...
This article reads more like a propaganda page than impartial information. It is probably written and maintained by a member of staff at the school, but even so it should give a neutral point of view. For example, the old fashioned grammar school attitudes that the school desperately hangs on to (these include uniforms that haven't changed at all since the 1950's, authoritarian attitudes that are concerned by uniform more than actually making sure the children get a good education, etc, etc...) cause tension between students and teachers, as these obviously dubious values do not fit well into modern society. Just to add to this, the most recent ofstead report strongly emphasises the need for student and teacher relationships to improve. however, because of the senior staff all living in the 1930's, they took this to mean they need to enforce the rules more, with stronger emphasis on uniform and weaker emphasis on educational support; this has simply degraded student's relationships with their teachers (especially the so - called ""senior staff"" who don't even teach but instead spend their time punishing people for petty things - the school even employs a certain member of staff whose job it is to be horrible - ironically she is actually called Mrs Horrod!) even further.
MAYBE SOMEONE COULD INCLUDE THIS IN THE ARTICLE AND MAKE IT LESS HEAVILY BIASED.
Thanks, sorry for the rant.82.153.112.177
All positive points, no negatives mentioned AT ALL...
This ar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.