text
stringlengths 6
5k
| racial_origin
int64 0
3
| gender_sex
int64 0
3
| religion
int64 0
3
| ability
int64 0
3
| violence
int64 0
3
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Because you have done it to my edits several times, at the last count I think my own edits have been changed 4 times
hockeyguy676 1/31/2011 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
It was also from a very early episode of Star Trek, but I could have sworn they stole it from a much earlier twilight zone episode | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
how about you make a contribution to the page, can you do that? or are you just going to sit there tweaking minor things that get you off on rules. rules are for people like you who are too unintelligent to do anything your self. there are exceptions to rules, except you are not bright enough to figure that out. what do you major in, physical education? Have you ever even been inside that steel mill? Do you realize the importance of those images? Do you realize that photographers find each others work by searching for things they are interested in? Its just an external link, stop being a douchebag. do your self a favor and go inside that mill yourself, you wont because your too weak... you just sit in your dorm room jerking off to you revisions. good luck with that. | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Asgardian RfC draft
In case you'd like to sign or to offer your thoughts: User talk:BOZ/RFCU Asgardian draft. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
One l or two?
I strongly suspect it's one. Could someone correct the title? (I don't know how.) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
.
Russell Hamilton
Who are you? What do you know? What do you do for work? Are you and actual employee or attorney for Wikipedia? Answer the questions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hyperbole? You are kidding right? It's more like an understatement given the deaths Churchill was responsible for. Difference being that Churchill is awarded with medals and honors for killing Nazis and other terrorists while Udham Singh gets the noose for killing one terrorist. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
What would be the advantage? The article itself stated: Jason is an average teenager at the time this article was written by himself. How is that encyclopedic? talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
opinion/origin
It is my opinion that lip stick originated from the placing or vaginal excrement onto lips of women. | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No The AfD probably should have been closed as no consensus in my view, but DRV provides an appeal mechanism for the AfD process and there's no evidence that MBisanz did anything wrong. This recall request seems dangerously close to a WP:POINT violation. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Suggestion on Signpost archieves
Hi, I'm trying to check a quote by Jimbo I just paraphrased (End of Talk:List of fictional universes#Where_does_this_end.3F, and in parsing the archives wished you all thought to do this: Use the Template:succession to allow scanning archive to archive (See bottom monarchy's, say Hugh Capet for example, or The_Honor_of_the_Queen#Masadans to show how flexible this little template can be!) so when someone is running down something they saw, they can pop from version to version with next to no fuss.
If you find merit in the idea, I'll be glad to lend a hand retrofiting the older stuff. Just drop me a note. I need something to keep me off the streets when Europe goes to sleep, the system runs fast, and I'm too burned out to cognate on proper sentence formation! Back to looking for that interview link! Best wishes // nkB " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
MVN
The page looks excellent. It is quite impressive. And yes - while much is standard textbook material ... some is not ... and perhaps that is the point ... formulae are being given without reference or citation or derivation/proof, and in the absence of same, it is not clear if such formulae are 'original' or if they are sourced.
And if they are sourced, where/what is the source? It would be helpful if the source could be provided. All the best. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ISO 639-3
I started List of ISO 639-1 codes. In future this could be a reference point for a code transition. I you like to add some codes or general thoughts, I am happy -) (Talk) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
It shouldn't matter how many parameters there are. I used it on Talk:Lina Medina and Talk:Maung Zarni and it removed the BLP noticeboard template. Do you have a listing of pages that need to be removed or the pages you are testing it out on? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
WikiCup award
. , and ]] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I see. So just because WWE says something in their title history, doesn't mean it's correct. Right?????? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Jasenovac i Gradiska stara
Could you, please, explain semiprotection of this article i.e. blocking anonymous editorials of this article?72.75.20.29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Stay out of it damn it, do not fuck around with me. Just go somewhere else and edit there and stay out of my business. Understand? 22:36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
", 17 July 2013 (UTC)
I thought you were referring to our height, from what Joyson said I believe you're even taller than myself! ᧾ 08:53" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thanks for clearing that up. I wasn't sure of who did what at the BLITZ performance. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No Picture?
With such a heinous murder and rape spree, why isn't there a picture of the thug? His spiteful, bastard face must be seen to have the full effect: Mugshot
Also, it should be mentioned somewhere, maybe in a Controversies section, that the Oakland black community and black activist groups actually came to Mixon's defense- calling him a soldier, a hero, and a victim: Source 1 , Source 2 50.29.10.210 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
. By the way, the 15 scholars you so rave about did not all work on Scanderbeg. That website was a joint effort from people on the internet to gather info on all Italian nobility(as stated on the main page)> Meanign those 15 have contributed for different characters all together. The main page itself makes it clear that the page is prone to make mistakes... | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You appear to have a rather warped view of things, please read texts more carefully and look for reliable secondary sources rather than imposing your own preconceptions. Unless you've specific proposals for article improvement, your comment appears to be offtopic soapboxing, . . , talk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
ok, the links are attached. by the way, i want to stop this edit war. thats why i always added some referances. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This is a directory of talk page archives. Please do not modify it. Thank you.
../Archive 61 (January 2012)
../Archive 62 (February 2012)
../Archive 63 (March 2012)
../Archive 64 (April 2012)
../Archive 65 (May 2012)
../Archive 66 (June 2012)
../Archive 67 (July 2012)
../Archive 68 (August 2012)
../Archive 69 (September 2012)
../Archive 70 (October 2012)
../Archive 71 (November 2012)
../Archive 72 (December 2012) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The purpose of the DMN Editorial reference and quote
The purpose of the quote was to show the impact of this incident on the church's perception in the larger community. The church got out ahead of the incident, was open about it, and as a result, gained respect from at least one member of the press. If there is a way of saying this without citing that particular article, then feel free to replace the text with something else that gets the point across. /(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"::::::Better ""rhetoric"" than the vitriolic ravings of a renowned bigot, hey Jeffro? Given how quickly your notoriety is spreading I guess your ousting is just a question of when ) talk
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Well, 4twenty42o, I certainly don't put on any show here, but if you find it amusing, please have a laugh. Certainly I don't see any fun in it whatsoever. I sure hope that NeilN would take another approach and not jump the gun as he certainly did this time. Also, yes, I am frustrated, and I most certainly have the best reason in the world for that. Mario Roering is not only lying, violating my copyright, slandering, posting defamation etc. here on Wikipedia harming Genseiryu and myself etc. but he does so with dedicated pages in my name on his own homepage and other sites on the Internet. Keeping up with Mario Roering and posting complaints and requests for removal of content on sites such as YouTube, free webhosting etc. is a full time job. Mario Roering has absolutely no just cause for doing what he does, and his involvement here at Wikipedia is no different from his exploiting every other possible way on the Internet to slander me. On the contrary. That is why I do not need anymore crap from anyone, and perhaps I do tend to sort people a little too fast, even though their actions may not have been ill intended, but perhaps the last situation illustrates quite well exactly why I tend to do that? Another good example is when both Mario Roering and I were blocked a few weeks back, Mario Roering was unblocked just an instant later, but I was not, even though we posted the exact same reasons for requesting the unblock. Ever since 2005, when all this started, Mario Roering's candy-talking, deceits and lies have won him favors here on Wikipedia from the admins and others. The last action from NeilN would in my best opinion constitute yet another one such favor. I have never ever postulated, that these favors were done or initiated on purpose, but I have, and I still do claim, that lack of interest for fairness, facts and true intentions, makes this kind of manipulation by Mario Roering possible. And it should not be possible. EVERYONE should be equal to rules and regulations, but for Mario Roering, on mcuh more than one occasion, that has indeed not been the case. Mario Roering has been able to continue his deceitful and ill intended ways on Wikipedia for almost 5 years now. When will it ever stop? As long as it is this easy for Mario Roering to manipulate everyone he wants to, I cannot see the end of it. Even though I still believe that Mario Roering was using NeilN, and that NeilN did indeed jump the gun here siding with one party, instead of issuing equal consequences for both, I will let this one go and ""reset"" the system. But what I have written here, should be taken into account and something serious should be done about Mario Roering's methods and ways. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Footnotes reviewed
OK, The references here were not nearly as bad as they were on the OWU main page, but they still need some attention-particularly around the Campus Crusade for Christ issue. I personally do not like CCC, but unless you can provide better resources, then I question the inclusion in the section. I do not believe this event, which appears to be isolated to the campus only, is notable. The article over is improving, but the article still has a fair amount of POV... and it has improved since being nominated for GAR.
""[4]^ Roots of Secession: Slavery and Politics in Antebellum Virginia. University of North Carolina Press. Retrieved on 2005-10-15."" This link does not mention Thomson or Ohio.
""[5] ^ The Methodist Movement Comes to America and Impacts Slavery. Reve' M. Pete. Retrieved on 2003-01-01."" This is a personal website, therefore not a reliable one.
Branch Rickey doesn't belong in an article titled ""Activism AT Ohio Welseyan University."" He might be usable in a separate section discussing the legacy or continuing activism of OWU students. But he does not work as examples of activism at OWU.
""[9]# ^ Mary King. Ohio Wesleyan University. Retrieved on 2006-12-07."" Does not support the notion that Mary King worked with Martin Luther King or that she did so while a 'young student.' Nor does the reference mention the SNCC.
""By February 1987, student political action had brought Ohio Wesleyan to pledge to fully divest holdings connected to South Africa. [16]"" Are you sure about that date? I started school in the fall of 87 and the schools involvement with apartheid was a huge issue until my junior year. Apartheid and environmentalism were the two causes that stood out.
""[19]^ a b Local Groups. United for Peace and Justice. Retrieved on 2006-08-10."" This is a list of local groups, but it doesn't mention anything about protest in front of the city hall.
""[25]^ a b [OWU Read this Column]. The Transcript. Retrieved on 2006-12-12."" This is an opinion paper article written 3 years after the incident. It is not a reliable source.
""[26]^ a b Dear Editor. Kelly Horstman, The Transcript. Retrieved on 2006-12-12."" This is an opinion page of letter's to the editor written three years BEFORE the issue in question.
""[27] # ^ Colleges draw line on sidewalk chalk. CNN. Retrieved on 2006-12-03."" This reference should be removed completely. It was originally there to support an allegation that chalking was against the rules. The article says the exact opposite of what was originally stated. The wording has since been changed but this link remains.
""[23] # ^ McMurtrie, Beth. ""Crusading for Christ, Amid Keg Parties and Secularism"", Chronicle of Higher Education, May 18, 2005, p. A42."" This article was written in 2001-not 2005. Thus it is impossible for it to discuss events that occured in 2003. Also, based upon the synopsis, this article does not support any of the allegations in this section. " | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
SineB
I didnt do anything, i just made the page better!!!!!! Dolphins will rule, and im Makai200150 by the way.. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Happy to discuss this further
Please let me know if you want to call me to discuss these edits. Happy to go over this and come to a resolution. Clearly we are not on the same page. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The CorenSearchBot automated message is in error. In this page in question, everything that was text of someone else’s creation was never copied into the main page, instead, the original publication / article was linked to the page with proper reference and completely credit given to the author on the Vollrath Tavern page. Everything authored and displayed on the Vollrath Tavern Wiki page in question is completely of my own intellectual property.
I am new to Wiki and wish to abide by all the correct rules so if anyone that views this discussion and would like to give me some sort of pointers as to the proper way to go about things here, I warmly welcome such.
Thank you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wait, make that the 20th, as long as it is a weekday38.116.200.46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thank you..Maybe somebody from Indonesia did it.. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
File: Nemo Submarine Voyage
Hi, I got the file from wikimapia on the article about the attraction. I don't know where the person who uploaded it on that website got it from. I'm sorry if it is copyrighted.BeasttoBeast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
" December 2011 (UTC)
Evidently not so obvious as was seen by the example I provided. Now you can add conditions to make your assertion true, but questions remain. Looking at this in the light of the article on infinitesimals, is even more confusing. If mathematicians don't agree (which contrary to your claims of there being just a few constructivists!), it is hard to believe that a lay person would understand anything in this article.
Wikipedia - the world according to Rubin, Hardy and their sidekicks. Please don't try to refute this - it is undeniably true. Once again, that your non-notable Wikipedia entry exists is proof of what I claim. Now go ahead and just delete everything because you have the ""power"" to do so. Just remember that you are turning more academics away by your intransigence and refusal to see the light. 12.176.152.194 16:21, 24" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Concerning the fate of Imperial soldiers in the WoR...
'What happened to the imperial soldiers after the cataclysm remains a mistery, but it is assumed that most of them pledged allegience to Kefka and decided to become his honorguards and worshipers for the sake of their own survival and would otherwise be killed.'
Why exactly is it 'assumed' that most Imperial soldiers pledged allegiance to Kefka, and by whom is this assumed? Wouldn't make more sense to assume that most Imperial soldiers simply stopped soldiering and moved on with their lives after the Empire was wiped off the face of the world?
Granted, the player will encounter a variation of prototype MagiTek armor in Kefka's tower, but it seems just as likely that these are prototypes that Kefka's own minions scavanged from the remains of the MagiTek Factory, or even perhaps these units belong to a small faction of Imperial fanatics trying to infiltrate the Tower and overthrow Kefka themselves. Grimgerde | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I'm housesitting for my grandparents who are out of town. They don't have a computer, so I can only get to mine on certain occasions. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fergus Graham
Hi Phoe, please could you cast your expert eye over Fergus Graham? Thanks! (talk) • (contribs) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Why are you STILL harassing me? Do you love Boston that much? Where the fuck(that is right, I wrote it.) is you threat or block of that clown who left racists comments over a BS topic? Was it you? You have a serious problem. Why in the hell are you following me every place I go on here. The Indian thing was a fucking comment that anyone can leave. If you search on this whole site, you wil find FAR worse than what I wrote. You faggots (yeah I wrote that too. I guess you can see that I can give a fuck about a block since I can create endless IP address. I see we may go back into an IP war...) seem to jump at everything I do. Get off of my dick. Why don't you go shut the racists down? I guess you think as they do so it is cool with you. When I write something on here not related to New England, I should not expect your monkey ass to be on my case. I guess I am ready to be blocked. Believe me when I tell you, I will be on YOUR cases after harassing over some bullshit Boston/New England commnets! | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
a joke, as they are sometimes interpreted. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
May 2007
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, as you did at Japan Focus. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.
Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.
If you are not ""notable"" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
scum who look up to Che deserve the worst kind of death.==
you faggot little bitches suck balls.
== | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Androzaniamy
Well done. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Please stop you're disruptive edits with regard to citation style. They are against policy and against arbitration rulings, as has been pointed out to you before. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Goderich Pirates
If you want to add a note about the mascot, just add it to the body of the article. The infobox is not set up for a mascot input. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"The person who said that it was hit by a missile was the brother of someone on the airplane. Clearly he is going to be emotional and not a worthwhile source. The fact of the matter is that the first patrol to come across the wreckage was asked to investigate because the Joint Defense Operations Center on base detected the sound of the plane crashing into the ground. Bear in mind that the sound detector is used to listen for mortars and would hear a ""missile"" hitting the aircraft. Also, the reason the JDOC sent the first patrol to investigate was because the cameras that observe around the base were obstructed by the fog. This was the thickest fog I have ever seen. My section was the second section to be called up to respond to the crash. The first section to go out picked up the two barely surviving individuals and my section picked up the bodies with the pararescuemen. I was driving and I could barely see 75m ahead of my truck. There is absolutely no way that the enemy could spot the plane in the fog and shoot it down. Shooting down an aircraft is not an easy task for insurgents in the first place, shooting down a plane in that thick of fog, with a ""missile?"" (insurgents don't have missiles), and having a ""missile"" that doesn't make a sound is not possible and should not be given any credence. Also, the plane did not crash ""1.5 miles"" from the base. The hull of the plane and all the wreckage was about 200m from the fence, consistent with an attempted landing. You seem pretty smug and sure of yourself but the fact of the matter is that all you did was read reports from unreliable Russian websites and fancy yourself with conspiracy theories. Keep diluting yourself with you're ridiculous conclusions, you'll stay an idiot forever.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
You don't have to be so rude about it! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
for the sake of simplification, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reference
For Jews not walking under the Arch: http://www.davidsconsultants.com/jewishhistory/history.php?index=entries | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Thanks
Hey,
Thanks for adding infoboxes to some cpu articles. Its nice to see infoboxed you make being accepted by others. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Please pay attention. You just blanket reverted my changes three times. You did not come to the talk page to discuss your edits, rather I had to drag you over here from your talk page, and finally my talk page. You have also not explained your reverts in any detail. You seem only interested in edit warring and restoring a poorly written, poorly formatted, and poorly composed lead section. On Wikipedia, we generally try to improve articles, not make them worse. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Who was that jerk who blocked me?? Why some assholes have authority to block the others. Either you, pseudo grandmaster of azeri origin make your own corrections about Antient City of Shusha founded by Panah Khan in 18 century or I will keep vandalizing your stupid article and then write a special letter to wikipedia accusing you of spreading Azeri propaganda in Wikipedia.
I wanna know the name of those assholes who tried to block me. Fucking idiots. | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
rock alternative?????
rock alternative? like a Placebo,Radiohead,Bush,30 Seconds to mars???
bad Info about genre of HIM,they are Love Metal,Gothic rock,Metal Alternative,Hard Rock....the wikipedia in English is horrible,bad work Yankees! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"WRONG 122.105.147.127 AKA David873
""with the exception of seven unique markers.""
the source clearly indicates the chinese and thai markers in the vietnamese, the 7 unique markers are the oirginal viet DNA.
" | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Please explain why you consider my articles 1982 Commonweath Games and Anzac Square, Brisbane, to be of such low quality, value and importance. Also please explain the exact criterion you are using to rate the articles and why you consider yourself to be expert and important enough to be able to make such decisions. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Warning, Another Warning, Final Warning: Your Foul Conduct. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Except that Microsoft has changed the user agent string for its browser significantly recently (as is indeed mentioned on that very page). If ""NT"" was no longer an actual designation, surely it would have been removed along with those changes? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Greece isnt claiming lands in Fyrom.Nor is Fyrom ancient macedonian territory but Thracian one of the paeonians.So the nationalist here is the state of Fyrom. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Gun Powder is tying too hard to find ironies. Block printing and moveable type are such obvious discoveries that there is nothing to be gained by discussing priority. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
IRS==
Did I miss something? Where is a citation for the statement that the IRS found no irregularities? I see nothing, but in the next sentence a link to Copeland's site.
Just curious.
== | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Indic scripts in lead for movies
Heya, are we leaving Indic scripts for movies in the lead or removing them as well? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
My advice on BVM? let them do the talking, until they run dry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Bigfoot
Howdy, DreamGuy. Given the escalating situation on Bigfoot, I've decided to go ahead with an RfC on Beckjord's behavior. It's located and is not yet ""live"". I want to be as thorough as possible, and as you can probably guess, collecting diffs is a tedious task. Your help would be greatly appreciated. If you do help out, please edit only the evidence sections, and don't sign or endorse anything just yet. Other than that, make changes as you see fit. Thanks. 79 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
exuse me but how dare you block me i havnt said anytting that was untrue FridgeMagnet is out to cause trouble do you have any idea how many people in this complex need to use THIS IP ADDRESSs??? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
On prcatice
I agree with you - it's temporary. But it's not silly. It comes from Marxistism: Theory vs. Practice. I'm for the neat version. But if Db be is stubborn, I'll put it in too. Why not? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Your a dirty wanker who loves little boys naked | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Well, it was. And when it was, we pushed to improve ourselves, which we did. And then we got shot down. Very disheartening when we were told it was not to be. I had a similar discussion about this months ago with some others here. There are sites lower on the food-chain with nothing going for them that have had a page here since Day 1 and have never been deleted. Meanwhile we got something going for us that doesn't involve porn or selling turkey roasters, and we were erased as quickly as possible. And I swear, it's just people from TV.com bringing it up because we are competition. What's worse is that there's really no group, or even a couple of independent staff members who make it a point to become versed in websites to help decide what stays while remaining neutral. It's a very sketchy process that I think we've gotten the brunt end of. And don't worry, I'm not going to assume that if I can convince you we deserve to be here, you'll go fight for us. But I would like to extend appreciation for putting a fresh pair of eyes on an old argument. 17:00, 16 October 2006 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
how big is ur cock
i wanna suck u dry | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"Well my ""disruptive"" actions appear to be completely legit and correct." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Yes, have just completed correcting them. Regards, Mayasutra | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
//JFAC is deathcore.
After seeing all these deathcore bands, and the fact that meshuggah is on here, finally does point me to how unreliable wikipedia is.//
No, not for a while have they been Deathcore. 68.32.114.10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Orphaned fair use image (Image:ASL_November.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:ASL_November.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — '''''' talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ignore this nut case | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
You play. They have left the ArbCom. Neither is active, neither responds, neither comments to ArbCom matters. One of them demonstrably displays bias. Each of them accuses me falsely without providing justification. And you count their votes. You make some narrow point about one case but you endorse their lamentable actions. Shame! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
I know most of my hiragana and katakana, although I need to study again as I took a break from learning for half a year, but I know basic words like hello and the numbers, but i still need to catch up again on lots of stuff. I also plan to move to japan in the future, I don't have time for class, or the money, I'm only juu-san years old. (Sorry this pc (my mums) dont have a kana or kanji generator.) Oh, and I forgot the words for sorry and thank you and please.
P.S. I use BitTorrent, it's slow, then theres finding the [torrents, don't get me started. Tur (Contribs) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Well, at least now I know that you don't know the modern meaning of the term. That makes these two blocks just slightly more understandable, but not much. I suggest you learn them... a lot of words have multiple meanings & hopefully if you learn them you won't take such offense to them because you will know what the intended meaning of them is. ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Assortive mating
This edit represents more of the same problems above; one theory (which by the way is disputed among geneticists, reference criticism of Comings' work in The Gene Bomb) is undue in this article. Please find secondary review sources independent of those who promote the theories, and then consider whether that text belongs in an overview of autism, or in causes of autism if good sourcing can be found. (Talk) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
":he basically said that it is too irrelevant to make a big issue out of it; if it was on a user page, he'd do something about it, but it's just Panonian speaking about that he's trying to protect Hungarians with this deletion. But if you have a different opinion, just tell him. – talk
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I've added List of Jewish jurists to the list of requests for mediation. Please take a look and make any comments that you wish. Thanks. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Blocked again
I have blocked you again. Sorry, but Wikipedia does not need single-purpose accounts tenaciously promoting fringe views on contentious subjects. Your edits have served solely to promote an agenda and cause dissent on a topic which has more than enough heat already. Guy () | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Jaden Yuki
Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles as you did to Jaden Yuki. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
There is no policy basis for the block. Your idea that engaging in a discussion in an article talk page (with only two comments, no less) in a way that involves policy constitutes a policy discussion is just preposterous. Posting the murderer's name on the talk page does not constitute disruption: yes, making a point, but no, not disrupting Wikipedia, and in any case they've promised not to continue. And given that you have been involved in the discussion and taken a clear stance against this user's opinions (as established by you here), it might be best for you to let it be. I honestly see at most 2 who really support the block: you and Jayron, and you'd been involved in the dispute. Arguably Exploding Boy might have, but his one comment has been contradicted. Roux, Hersfold, and Baseball Bugs never said anything about the block, and Roux is highly involved anyway. Enigma ""supported"" a checkuser but gave no reasoning at all. Plus, we've gotten concessions from the user. juicetalk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Holy crap, I take it back, the above kid who started this postis not an idiot, (I never said he was stupid) YOU ARE! I never even said he was wrong, when he brought this thing up, every wrestling site on the net already brought up the fact that JR will be returning at Wrestlemania, but yet he had to inform us, anyway. God man, you seriously need to pay attention to what I wrote before you bring up irrelevant support, and stop using the lame ""I suck at grammar, because I'm Norwegian"" excuse, you may easily fix your mistakes, but you choose not to! I am through communicating with you, ""Lord"". This post ends here. And that's the bottomline, because said so!" | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
i was drunk, i never get drunk again| | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Exactly. And we'll also need to remove some of the reviewers as well. It's now 1,200 words. That's crazy with a movie where there aren't a lot of divergent opinions. This isn't Last Tango in Paris or 2001: A Space Odyssey> | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
hey what is that crazy shit you put on my talk page about?
Seriously. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
scripture about peter the apostles house
Now while Peter doubted in himself what this vision which he had seen should mean, behold, the men which were sent from Cornelius had made enquiry for Simon's house, and stood before the gate
A Boyle | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Wikipedia Signpost: 17 August 2009
From the editor: Where should the Signpost go from here?
Radio review: Review of Bigipedia radio series
News and notes: Three million articles, Chen, Walsh and Klein win board election, and more
Wikipedia in the news: Reports of Wikipedia's imminent death greatly exaggerated, and more
Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe
Delivered by at
Wikipedia Signpost: 24 August 2009
News and notes: $500,000 grant, Wikimania, Wikipedia Loves Art winners
Wikipedia in the news: Health care coverage, 3 million articles, inkblots, and more
Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe
Delivered by at
Wikipedia Signpost: 31 August 2009
Flagged protection and patrolled revisions: Misleading media storm over flagged revisions
Flagged protection background: An extended look at how we got to flagged protection and patrolled revisions
Wikimania: Report on Wikimania 2009
News and notes: $2 million grant, new board members
Wikipedia in the news: WikiTrust, Azerbaijan-Armenia edit wars
Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: [[Wikipedia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Rustaveli cinema
Could you please restore the article Rustaveli cinema? I was still working on it. Thanks. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
, death to vandalist of this Maratha sport | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
"
The ""other side"" has not ""just leaned against the wall."" The ""other side"" has done something Floydian's ""side"" has not—done research and presented evidence. Perhaps he missed that part of the discussion. Here's the evidence...again:
Google Books
""perfect game"" baseball: 14,500 results
""perfect game"" bowling: 2,010 results
Google News
""perfect game"" baseball: 1,449 results
""perfect game"" bowling: 189 results
Floydian, what is ""your side""s response to this evidence that, by a large factor, ""perfect game"" is primarily a baseball term in high-quality sources? And, pray tell, what sort of ""research"" are you conducting? Are its premises as neutral as the examination of closely parallel search strings whose results you see here?— " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
If that's your idea of a stylish black cocktail dress, my work is cut out for me; it's almost as bad as those Diane Lane numbers you posted a few weeks ago: too much skin showing, nothing left to the imagination, too many shiny fabrics. RED, Orange, RED. (Talk) " | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Comment Neither source supports the content, unless a source is presented which actually does I will be removing this from the article. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
A barnstar for you!
The Teamwork Barnstar I like your edit on the Kayastha page. Lets form a solidarity group against those who malign the article and its subject matter. I propose the folloing name for the group.
United intellectuals' front of Kayastha ethinicty against racist or castist abuse (UIFKEARCA) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
WP:EW
You are at 3RR on the SPLC page - please be aware that you are likely to be blocked for such edit war behaviour. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
firstable this is a myth!
secondable no sources for almost a year(check a tag)
this is nonsence article lets get (finally) rid of it. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Perhaps Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts would be useful to try and try some dialogue out? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I'm afraid I have no idea what the sentence is trying to say either. Cungšan is a different person from Wang Gao. Wang Gao appears to be the maternal great grandfather (or maternal grandfather) of Nurhaci, while Cungšan is apparently also said by some to be an ancestor of Nurhaci, but that is uncertain. With no source, I don't really know what the sentence is trying to say. Personally I would just delete Wang Gao as it appears to have no relation to that sentence. I have some books on Chinese history, but right now I'm preoccupied with something else, so I'll have to check it another time. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
28 November 2006
The edit you made to Spectroscopy (this revision) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. If you are interested in making useful contributions, see the welcome page and the introduction to editing. However, please do not continue to vandalise pages; such edits will be reverted and you will be blocked from further editing – " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.