text
stringlengths 6
5k
| racial_origin
int64 0
3
| gender_sex
int64 0
3
| religion
int64 0
3
| ability
int64 0
3
| violence
int64 0
3
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
My Rfa
My effort to regain adminship was unsuccessful. I appreciate you reconsidering your earlier opposition. Thank you for taking some time out of your day to voice your opinion. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Latest socket?
""Socket T, also known as LGA 775, is Intel's latest desktop CPU socket"" - this statement should be changed to something that will hold true over time. Already I believe Socket M is newer." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Also, Clemson used this against Tennessee for the 2003 season Peach Bowl. Clemson RB Kyle Browning scored the touchdown. Technically, the play Arkansas ran wasn't the first time. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Deleted viewer
Hey Interiot, a while back we had a discussion here and you rigged up a deleted edit viewer; if you don't mind, I'd like to get a copy of the code to be able to run an installation of it in my toolserver account. Could you point me in the right direction? (Talk • ) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Check your local listings or your cable providers. Secondly, this is not a WP:FORUM but a talk page so discuss improvements on the article itself. Thanks, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I see that you have blocked me.
I presume you did not see OpenFuture threat on me
I forgot Swedish shady suspicious society Stavgard (talk)
You are, as usual, correct. We, The Swedish Branch of the Holy Order of Illuminati, are dead set to make sure the truth about the ancient calendars on Gotland will never reach the public eyes. We have more power than you can imagine. Resistance is futile, you will be assimilated. Don't forget to put on your aluminum foil hat. OpenFuture (talk)
Here he accepts that he is going to censure everything that has to do with Gotland | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"Calculation? ==
Can someone explain the calculation used to date the divergance?
In other words how do ancient ""human"" mitocondria (from the neanderthal period) differ from neanderthals?
That is a very different question than applying a contemporanious species metric to aincent ""humans"" with those of today.
I find it odd that neandertals are considered non human when ""Archaic Homo sapiens evolved between 400,000 and 250,000 years ago"".
Simialrly odd is this which shows two species of modern human.
== " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Article Feedback deployment
Hey Ntsimp; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does ). Thanks, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hi again Antandrus. I agree with your point two, of course - I mean that sincerely. My problem is that I've been editing anonymously for a while, I really don't know how long, and time was that I didn't have any problems with people randomly and arbitrarily undoing my work. At some point this began to happen. It is incredibly offensive. In fact, to me, it is much more offensive than if someone called me a cunt. The first time, I assumed it was an isolated incident, but then it happened again... and again... and again. At least 10 times, and perhaps 20 times or more, my edits have been reverted, often with no explanation, and sometimes with accusations of vandalism. It's been many months since the first time. And whether you take a polite tone, or you just mouth off at everyone, the end result is exactly the same. I have seen probably three or maybe four editors, yourself included, who have taken what I thought was the obvious view that you shouldn't arbitrarily revert IP edits, and I have seen at least ten times as many editors who revert arbitrarily, and plenty who invent post-hoc justifications for their actions.
These arbitrary reverts are a real slap in the face. I get more satisfaction out of responding viciously than I would out of responding politely, and the end result is exactly the same. It's very, very depressing to see how reasonable, sensible people like yourself became the minority. Believe me, if you were the majority, I would not be viciously slagging off anyone.
My IP will change at some point, I don't force it to but it does. I have no respect for the blocks that result from me being accused of vandalism, so I ignore them. And I keep on trying to improve articles, and eventually, the same will happen. So be it. 190.45.54.212 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Hi there, OK, I see what you've done here - almost a 'pseudo-link' that refers you to a list of references at page-bottom as opposed to inserting the titles, authors, etc, in brackets in the actual sentence. Could you forward me the ""code"" to use in order to have, for example, this reference linked to the bottom of the page:
Como Llego La Noche, Matos, Huber, Tusquets-2004
Thanks much - this seem to read much more easily when referencing in this manner." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Hey Martin. Spoondfeeding required! Where exactly—at the very end after ? At the end of the template main text just after }}{{{PS|}}} | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
September 2005 (UTC)
Yeah, the logo was a nice addition. Keep up the good work. 03:01, 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
My very own personalized barnstar - you are too kind, SL. Really appreciate the gesture. - (talk) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
?
And you think that normal run of the mill nationalist revert wars aren't obvious vandalism? | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Help needed
Could you please take a look at the Nair article. Matthew Vannitas recently added that the meaning of the word Nair is dog (here). This is getting a bit too much to tolerate. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"::The map has been here for years without anyone disputing it. What parts specificly do you think are incorrect? You can add tags if you want. khoi
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All of the fuss about Patent Trolls is driving coalitions of technology sector leaders to Washington, D.C. with their support of this year’s Patent Reform Legislation. With all the fanfare, it is perfect timing for the Original Patent Troll to make his comeback in the recent re-release of The Patents Video.
In 1994, the Patent Troll made his first appearance in The Patents Video. At its first release, The Patents Video was purchased by hundreds of corporations, universities, governmental entities and law firms. In The Patents Video, an unsuspecting victim is surprised by the Original Patent Troll who strategically positioned himself to collect patent licensing revenue.
Using dramatic vignettes, entertaining scenarios, humor and expert advice, The Patents Video explains the most commonly misunderstood concepts and the most critical information about patents. The Patents Video was designed to visually make key messages memorable. Topics include intellectual property (IP) law basics, domestic and foreign patent bar dates, patenting of ideas, and claim language with respect to patent infringement.
Engineers, scientists, marketers, managers, executives and corporate attorneys have a lesson in Bar Dates that no one forgets when they watch The Patents Video. Og, a caveman in a dream, has invented the wheel. Og and Thak push the wheel through downtown – all in public view. The Patents Video, an entertaining educational tool, explains how and why Og and Thak have lost their foreign patent filing rights and explains, in detail, how to avoid triggering U.S. and foreign patent Bar Dates.
A free viewing of a 3.5 minute clip from the 32 minute video is available by visiting www.ogandthak.com. YouTube viewers give the clip Five Stars.
Og and Thak | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Managed to find a creative-commons licensed photo to address your request, thanks for the feedback and hope this helps improve the article. Hope to see you around! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Lead is cluttered
The lead is becoming cluttered. Wikipedia:Lead section says ""The lead should be able to stand alone as a concise overview of the article."" Accretion is a continuing problem in Wikipedia articles. Some editors add material to the lead and don't bother to read the article as a whole. Detail belongs in the specific sections. The lead is supposed to be an introduction and a summary. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
]] #REDIRECT Moongileri | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PAH. The final section sounds like someones trying to advertise it. Nothing special guys... trust me, I live in Broughty Ferry... | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I would like to think it will be better with the Draft namespace but unfortunately I think it will just be the same since as far as I know all the rules are staying the same. Not that it really matters all that much too me. I'm retired from editing anyway, the only reason I am even bothering to comment is because I am bored. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Remove merge suggestion
The suggestion to merge the Arthur's Teacher Trouble article into here is not a good idea, and IMHO should be removed. Can I remove it? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
This article should not be ""speedy deleted"" which by the way would hardly be speedy because it has been here for a while. The band has gotten rave reviews by many media outlets see here, is set to release a second full length album within the year. They are one of the more prominent new bands within the chrsitian speed/thrash genre, and one of the more prominent new bands within the speed/thrash genre in general. All the information provided on this page is verifiable, it doesn't read like a fan page. So with that being said I think they meet the requirements laid down for the band guidlines and this article should not be deleted." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Revert as much as you want
But never say you have my permission to attack LEBANON | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
You attacked my post and removed it like you were a demigod when you are really nothing but a facist and you have the nerve to say YOU DIDN'T DO ANYTHING TO ME. mAYBE i SHOULD REMOVE EVERY EDIT YOU EVER POSTED BUT THEM i'M ONLY TRYING TO POST THINGS THAT WILL HELP SEEKERS OF THE TRUTH WHILE YOU ARE ON A TRIP TO FEEND YOUR GOD-COMPLEX. GO AHEAD CRY BABY PSEUDO-CHRISTIAN BUT AT LEAST BE HONEST AND STOP CALLING YOURSELF A CHRISTIAN, WE KNOW YOU ARE NOT BECAUSE YOU REJECT THE bible69.14.97.53 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Running Man Barnstar
Thank you, my friend. I, too, am pleased to see how the Miami Hurricanes Football article has progressed in a relatively short period of time. Thanks again.- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
will rest. And we will know peace, freedom, liberty, equality, and Progress. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wosner, ואזנר
His own official briefhead says Shmuel Halevi Wosner. And in Hebrew it says ואזנר, with one vav. So I changed things accordingly. | (talk) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
is a mere ""British ad executive"" notable enough to have a wikipedia entry? Do all ad executives get one in that case? Just a thought... " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I have given full reason on the discussion page. I don't need test edits to remove your lies. Peter Clatworthy. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Eli Soriano article again
Hi 4twenty42o,
If you are not so busy, your help in keeping an eye on the above article will be much appreciated. It's deja vu once again with anon's whitewashing and deceptive edit summaries. Thanks! – Shannon Rose Talk " | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Do not complain about irredentism if 1- you do not know what the word means 2- you yourself are an advocate of irredentism. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
With respect, what we find 'acceptable' has caused the debate and 'edit wars' here. A compromise seems to have been reached, based upon the definitions of Canadian / French / British American within Wikipedia itself. (See those articles). I think if people disagree, then they should be editing those articles to make them more acceptable rather than the articles / categories that result from using those definitions. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Category:Climate change skepticism
:Category:Climate change skepticism, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
The userbox says, ""This user is a native speaker of English."" It makes no claim as to the level that I can contribute at. Yes, my failure to capitalize properly is on the same level as you mispelling 'useful'. But it is not the same as this. There are many other examples of this poor English usage.
Two more things: when " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
He said he's WORKING ON IT, The Rouge Penguin, have some patience, Don't be an asshole. - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Ask User talk:Raul654. Gimmetrow | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Yes, it's very good, I should have said so. I did not really mean to be critical of your excellent efforts, it's just that I found that one of the hardest things for people who have not been teachers (and I really don't know whether you have or not) is to suppress the natural human urge to be helpful. Regards, 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Gallery
Why dont we put all the images and any others we can find in the bottom of the article in a gallery so there will be no conflict? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Yeah, clearly, both parts were already there. I did not change any of these. It is alright that some go out and check contributions here. But I only saw you were reverting like crazy. This can be harmful - you know, ""good faith"", ""be bold""...
It is not a good feeling to see work you have done speedily deleted, and I felt like ""what has happened here? Cannot be serious!"".
I'd say quid pro quo, you can excuse for your deeds, too. Good night, 88.151.79.141 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Excellent point - although one which a club of users (namely Demiurge and co.) seem determined to ignore. This is, however, consistent with the petty, vindictive nature of these individuals. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Well, why didn't you point this out in the first place instead of acting like a nutcase and telling me I'm ""censoring"" things? Stop acting as if you own the article. Your bully tactics don't really work on wikipedia and certainly not with me. Please refrain from deleting good faith edits and labelling them as ""vandalism"". One more thing, please fucking read the policies before you jump into bed with them, okay? Then fuck off and implement them. I really don't have time wasting my efforts on slime-of-an-editor like you who always acts as a troll and misuses his tools.. Talk Contribs " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
"{| class=""messagebox standard-talk"" id=""talkheader"" align=""center"" style=""background-color: #FFFFEE;""
|-
! colspan=""3"" style=""border: 1px solid #C0C090; background-color:#F8EABA; text-align:center;"" |
This is 's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to .
|-
|align=""center""|
| style=""background-color: #FFFFEE;"" |
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).
Put new text under old text, but please don't create a new section if a relevant one already exists, even if there is older discussion below. Click here to start a new section.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.
I will attempt to respond to your talk page whenever possible. If you prefer to respond to me on your own talk page, please leave me a note telling to to refer there, such as Template:Talkback. Otherwise, I might not check your talk page for a while. If a third party gets involved, it will go to hell quickly and get confusing, so we might want to try a centrallized discussion page.
If you're here to be uncivil or a dick, you may as well not bother. I won't be able to respect a message that insults me, so don't waste your time. If you are unhappy with something I've done, then address your concerns to me in a manner that begets mutual respect; you're more likely to get what you want like that.
I'm not an administrator, and can't help you with anything like that. If you need help, try here.
I have talk page stalkers who may address you before I can. Please respect them and thier comments.
| style=""margin: 0px; background-color: #F8EABA; border: 1px solid #C0C090; "" |
Be polite
Assume good faith
No personal attacks
Be welcoming
|}" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
DIE!
Die you piece of shit. chat " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
block|appeal a block]]. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I may still write something here. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thanks
Thanks for reverting my Talk page. I appear to have a new fan. Oh, joy... | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I've replied on that page. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Geared turbofan
Maury, wouldn't most of this info that you added to Pratt & Whitney Geared Turbofan be a better fit at geared turbofan. It seems like too much explanation for an type article to me. Just asking, as the info tht was there is actually from the geared turbofan section, where I copied it from! Just asking, thanks. - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fucking white trash cunt
Could you also be more careful with the revert button. Edouard-Henri Aril (Talk) - | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
After all the stuff that's happened with Crimea articles, why should I trust the text of a wikipedia page on such things? Do you have an actual source discussing the matter or are you guessing? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I've been tempted to work on Saurpoda to FA. Do you think its doable? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You need to give the discussion more time
The discussion hasn't been open that long. I highly recommend giving the discussion on Rich F more time so that others may comment. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I see you have just been ignoring me — very well. ¦ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
This douche bag I whose site I wrote that on changed info to false information on purpose so trivia teams would get the info wrong. He should be blockedNOT me. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Seriously, why don't you mind your own fucking business? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
":::I fear I may have misrepresented the 93rd edition. When I wrote ""75(note 15)"" above, I should have written ""75([superscript:]??"" looks like ""25"" or ""2.5"" in GBooks' representation. When I looked at this entry on p. 3-366 before, it looked like ""15"". Also, on ""Explanation of Table"" p. 3-2, I read
""The data in the table have many sources, including both the primary literature and evaluated compilations. The Handbook of Data on Organic Compounds, Third edition (Ref. 7) and the Combined Chemical Dictionary (Ref. 8) were important sources. Other useful sources of physical property data on organic compounds are listed in Refs. 9-19. The values in the table for the normal boiling point and the melting point that are accompanied with uncertainties (in parenthesis) have been critically evaluated using the NIST ThermoData Engine (TDE, Ref. 20), designed to implement the dynamic data evaluation concept (Refs. 21-24). This concept requires large electronic databases capable of storing essentially all relevant data known to date with detailed descriptions of metadata and uncertainties. The combination of these electronic databases with expert-system software, designed to automatically generate recommended property values based on available experimental and predicted data, leads to the ability to produce critically evaluated data dynamically, 'to order.' The uncertainties listed are combined expanded uncertainties (level of confidence, approximately 95 %) representing the most comprehensive measure of the overall data reliability (Refs, 25-28).""
So this suggests that some temperature values in the table are automatically derived but as I say, the ""25"" or ""2.5"" is a raised, reduced-sized font, not parenthesized. So the superscript may well refer to alternate sample pressure - I can't find whatever it references. I apologize if this dwells on this source too much; I think the consensus here that the bp is significantly higher than 75'C is dispositive.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Taulant has ""reported"" in many admins.....Please keep it here Taulant.him
and me
Taulant admins read the history of pages what do you think you will accomplish by lying? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Terri's weight: max of 200 vs. 250
In http://msnbc.msn.com/id/7306483/site/newsweek , Arian Campo-Flores writes:
By 1981, in her senior year at an all-girls Roman Catholic high school, she had reached as much as 250 pounds—at which point she went on a NutriSystem diet and quickly lost about 100 pounds.
Do you think that Arian was exaggerting or being careless? Is citing a maximum as a maximum not fair? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Nancy monitors the speedy delete requests. I tagged the KVMX redirect page for speedy delete in order to move the page and she took care of the move for me (sometimes the admins just delete the page and I have to move it myself). I really think the KBKO page should remain a disambiguate page with a listing for KVMX stating it was formerly KBKO-FM, that way they can still get to the new station if they happen to type KBKO. That's generally how we handle this kind of change. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
""" as she was known as ""McDonald"" to punters). However, I neither can recall or confirm from memory whether retaining the name was also legally as well. Maybe an email to duty office could confirm this. '''''' (talk • contribs) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Nothing happened to this user in May | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thanks. I'm really in a hurry, next 2-3 days. But I will come. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The estimate from the European Severe Weather Database translation by Thilo Kühne, who is good in Polish, is F2. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Source of Vandalism
""Under the heading ""Life as a Child,"" I added the sentence ""But even as an embryo, John Quincy Adams could feel pain and was a Founding Father."" I was logged out at the time, but my IP address (68.237.191.33) was recorded. If you do a reverse lookup of that, you'll see it belongs to pool-68-237-191-33.pghk.east.verizon.net. ""pghk"" stands for 'Poughkeepsie-Kingston.'""
The author can be found here:
http://www.google.com/search?sclient=psy&hl;=en&safe;=off&site;=&source;=hp&q;=gus+mueller+dug+hill&btnG;=Search#sclient=psy&hl;=en&safe;=off&source;=hp&q;=gus+mueller+%2B%22dug+hill%22&aq;=&aqi;=&aql;=&oq;=gus+mueller+%2B%22dug+hill%22&pbx;=1&bav;=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp;=fce33a84b0764b22&biw;=960&bih;=437
Here is the non-copyrighted source:
http://asecular.com/index.php?110704" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Not compatible with TemplateData
Wikipedia:TemplateData is a brand new feature which is apparently not fully compatible with wikEd:
Pick a template doc subpage, e.g. Template:Croatian Census 2011/doc.
Click on Edit.
Click on the ""Manage TemplateData"" button.
Change something in the pop-up form, e.g. the description.
Click on the ""Apply"" button"".
Now, changes made to template data should be propagated to the edit area ( element), but they are not. The workaround is to switch wikEd off when working with TemplateData form, or to use the edit area directly rather than the form. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
nothing
Moot wants to be the little girl | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Irresponsible
If you checked, I was not spamming Wikipedia, but my link is the first to come up when you search ""BMtron"" on Google, not a spam link. I advise you to pack your bags for Jersey, mo'fucka!!" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Again, please do not remove talk page content, as you have done here. On-topic comments or questions regarding the content of Wikipedia should not be modified; Wikipedia is not censored. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Despite much time for improvement and expansion, this page remains nothing more than a dictionary defintion. It already exists at Wiktionary (see wikt:Jesus H. Christ), complete with a much better etymology and discussion of the H part. (See their Talk page for details.) I've argued in the past that this page should be overwritten with the template but we couldn't reach consensus the last time the question came up. A complete rewrite to an encyclopedic tone would be appropriate, if it can be done. I don't see that there's enough verifiable, non-lexical content to support a stand-alone article even with the proposed conversion to a general profanity article but please be bold and try. (talk) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ok Send me the link to put my reference
Send me the link so that i put the information of the image i cant find it now. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
SuperDeng
Do something about him. He constantly blames me of vandalism, even though I have not done such. See the current version of the Battle of Budapest article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Budapest ....
....and my previus version. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Budapest&oldid;=48401057 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
File:IPod Touch 2.0.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:IPod Touch 2.0.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. (Talk) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I'm unblocked so why is my IP blocked? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I saw that link before. I think its not a real document. Some part was taken from real document.
You can notice that on this link they use ""heart dispersion"" (""50 % windage and elevation dispersion""). But morons placed here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIG550 extreme spread." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
I've added a few datestamps to kickstart the bot. We should see results tomorrow. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I'm no expert, but I think use like that is allowed if the CD or the CD cover is actually discussed within the article text. Another example is the famous Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band record cover used in the Beatles article. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Rape in the United States of America
I've removed this section, as it adds nothing to the article. Also see a number of WP:NPOV violations. Ottre
Your censorship adds nothing. The statistics I posted come from an excellent source, the U.S. Justice Dept.
Why does your highness not like the statistics?
Who made you king?
I agree that this paragraph appears to be included mainly to make a non-neutral point about the inferiority of black people to white people. It is phrased in a way that is strongly based in opinion and point of view. I would also point out to (talk · contribs)
This paragraph, or variations of it, has been repeatedly inserted into and removed from this article.
Ms. FisherQueen, would you delete the article on slavery in America because it is included mainly to make a point about the oppresive nature of white people?
" | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Alright, sounds good.►''''''Holla! " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Not very helpful
Capacitors and inductors, I guessed as much. So how do I get my 2.5ns 8kV pulse? This laser won't fire itself people!! 84.197.178.75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
the Boroughs council,it definitly dosent go to Manchester Council,the same with Bury,Wigan,Rochdale and Oldham. Bolton,Bury,Wigan,Rochdale and Oldham all have their own individual councils and your council tax goes to the council of the Borough you live in,not Manchester. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sandstein's sanction was lenient, but perfect in its discretionary intelligence and contextual reading. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
See Talk:Stagflation for the origin of that term and its disputedness of Macleod having said it first. Until the ACTUAL document of the Hansard (House of Commons debates) can be viewed (I've emailed the Parliamentary archives for it), this reference will remain dubious, in my opinion. - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
That request above was hardly an adequate conclusion. If someone would unprotect the article and add it with BNP to Wikipedia:Proposed mergers a more acceptable outcome should result and who knows, someone might actually see this article and add something to it... ~ .T.G " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Can I move this to Lima (mollusc)? Seems like a much better disambiguation to me. Hesperian | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
03:01, 20 December 2015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I apologize
Hey guys. Sorry I did those disruptive edits on this article, I won't do it again and I actually won't. I hope all of you guys forgive me. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
scavenger than a predator. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The WaPo article says, in effect, that a Fed hate crime prosecution would require a racial motivation, but if Brown had been white shooting at him when fleeing would still have been an intentional attempt to deprive him of his civil rights, per Garner. Are you saying there is no Federal statute that allows the DOJ to prosecute him for this, despite the Constitutional violation? | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
oi wanka...get a life | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
and even corroborated in the case of thew December 11, 1975 Iraqi government advertisements by pro-Zionist organizations | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
t-43
Could you please kindly explain me, what you consider to be a ""personal attack""? i don't get it really" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
)
No issues. Just needed something called how many casualties during a battle like above Endor.( | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thank you, I am sorry about that. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Can you please remove all of the blank space on this graph by re-uploading it because it is not only unsightly but its now very un-user friendly for those of us that want to see it properly. Besides we don't know if there will be a snap election or not (unlikely I know but we don't have and are not allowed to pretend we have a crystal ball are we). I can understand you not wanting to re-upload it now because, it will need to be updated in May as agreed as per it's talk page, so if you want to wait till after the local elections by all means do -) Cheers mate 130.88.114.46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Issue on images still unresolved
Slim, I'm copying this message and my reply to your page for your notice.
I appreciate your inputs in Image talk:Monkey3.jpg and I agree once in a while I might sound rude (purely unintentional, since I put facts blantly). But SlimVirgin is abusing his admin power to overrule anyone.
Slim is not a ""he"". Given that she named herself after a Javanese princess, perhaps you could take the hint and note that she's a woman. Also, I don't think you were simply blunt. I think you were rude to Slim. I recognise it's a fine line but given that I've mentioned it to you, perhaps you'll take more care to stay on the right side of it?
She has suggested in an email to me, that she is in talks with another editor. Now, I don't know who this other editor and i certainly don't like this secrecy. Instead of having a discussion on this, she wants to finish the matter begind closed doors. She could've atleast told me who this reputed editor was to let me have a word with him/her.
Perhaps she is seeking guidance on how she should approach you and wants that to be untainted by your input. I think that would be reasonable. I have a high regard for Slim and I don't think she would have a nefarious purpose in speaking to a third party.
Inso far as the images are concerned, I had stated to her a couple of images on one issue (animal rights) is ok, but she insists she needs to showcase the entire album provided by PETA and its assocites.
So you have a dispute. You need to recognise that you are not necessarily right! You disagree about how many images are necessary. I feel that you have to allow that your disagreement might be fuelled by your political differences as much as how you interpret the image policy.
This should could easily achieve by providing an external link to the images provided by a controversial organization.
The BUAV is not a ""controversial organisation"". It is a highly respected body, whose voice is listened to in all circles of British society. A viewpoint doesn't become ""controversial"" just because you don't share it.
Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral and not have extreme viewpoints -
But you expect it to reflect your viewpoint.
thus I requested her to limit her fair use policy in this regard to 2-3 images which can be used across similar articles. this she refuses.
I don't see how it is any fairer to use one, two or ten images in this instance. While I agree that Slim could have taken more care to provide a rationale for using the images, I simply don't feel that your argument about how many she should have used has much weight. One factor in deciding fair use is how much of a thing you use, that's true, but it's only one factor, and obviously, each picture is a separate case to be considered as well as part of a whole.
As far as the other images, some are on personalities she claims have ""agreed"" to use their photos here. Unless she gets a written consent and a permission how can I believe.
First of all, you can believe Slim because you assume good faith. Perhaps you're not aware of that policy. Yes, you can ask Slim to provide evidence of that, but your assumption should be that she has in fact acquired that agreement. Harassing another editor to provide evidence to your satisfaction and insisting you won't believe them until they have do not show an assumption of good faith.
Once I pointed out that {permission} photos would be deleted anyway, she backed off and argued that it be kept on the grounds of fair use asking me to trust her.
Yes, okay. Trust her AND ask for proof.
Both of us are editing in good faith, but one of us has power and a circle of friends to back her while the other (me) relies on the hope that ppl. like you will help me out in this.
I'd urge you to rely on the issues rather than the personalities. Yes, Slim does have powerful friends, who will back her regardless, but you should still do your best to make it about the issue in question and not about her.
If she gets away with this and sets a precedence then I'm afraid there are hordes of copyviolaters straining at the leashes to bomb Wikipedia with copyrighted information.
''I think that's a bit dramatic but I agree that she has to obey the rules, which exist for good reason, and shouldn't be given a pass just because she is friends with the arbcom. However, she is not a ""copyviolater"" trying to destroy Wikipedia. Partly, I think she simply didn't understand your problem, and that was in part a failure of your communication, and partly she has become too used to having her views echoed by her friends and doesn't handle disagreem | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The editor is likely another sock of Fahey. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
gentlemen and gentlemen, ProKo has been reverted since no one here agrees with him or her. thank you! | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:1966 U.S. Open (golf) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.