Datasets:
tasksource
/
jigsaw_toxicity

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
1
id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
12ec3c283ffc467f
". Iran ""accidentily"" shoots down one of our planes, but we deliberately shot down the airliner? Location or not this is false"
0
0
0
0
0
0
12ed7dbf9d937789
- Note: Freddy Krueger is a human. He was a child muderer while he was alive. Then his soul passed over and possessed the dream world with the help of the dream demons where he inflicts mayhem upon the children of elm street.
0
0
0
0
0
0
12edb4a6f40c91f6
" Glenn Beck I endorsed and restored your edits. Sourced, relevant. The ""CAPTAIN"" is alone in his dissent. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
12ede95b6a12397c
you people are pretty overzealous with this whole free thing. get a fucking life, you fucking niggers !!!23 16!!!
1
1
1
0
1
1
12ef27740f77936d
" Fine! Say Headcheese!Chord2 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
12efec612bc53171
" A barnstar for you! The Special Barnstar File:Cropped Tripuri.jpg for your super image i give u a Barnstar "
0
0
0
0
0
0
12f01727d30a9337
I'm still continuing the behaviour on the da:Danish Wikipedia.
0
0
0
0
0
0
12f055e60230e7cc
" You've been overtly harsh with it. No need. Leads often don't have sources. Your being rather preducice You are the THICKEST person ever if you cannot read what is impled or understand basic words such as Madien in a sporting context and thus shouldn't be doing GAC's ever! LEVEL 2 English exactly why you shouldn't be commenting on FACs and GACS gee wizz this is why the English wiki is so shit. What's going on? I asked you to explain your objections a couple of days ago to moving pictures in the 'Golden Eagle Awards' article, but you haven't; I see you have also been asked above to review something, but you haven't done that either. In the meantime you have found time to 'edit a tonne of other pages'. And at the top of this page you have a box which says: ""If you want to ask me something, please do that so.""You seem to have ignored everything and everyoneWhat's going on? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
12f0ff458fc07823
"::No Piotrus, I think ""SSR"" addition wouldn't be enough. In fact, I find the issue of pre-war partition of Poland hardly relevant here. We can assume that the Polish communities would form their distinct attitude towards Nazis and partisans anyway, no matter how many years ago Polish state was lost. I believe it's more about ethnicity and religion. However, if you insist on mentioning the partition issue, two thesises need to be stressed in the text: there were territories previously under Polish and under Soviet rule those territories were multiethnic at the time, not ""Polish""; significantly Belarusian/Ukrainian as well I'll suggest my text formulation later. And I hope these my opinions will be considered when writing new specific articles ""from Polish perspective"". "
0
0
0
0
0
0
12f1bde6c918e0bb
Crossmr I altered
0
0
0
0
0
0
12f24274c750a438
t PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT! PHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE! SALT!he
1
0
1
0
1
0
12f2cc343ffe1814
Okay, but the tag is inappropriate because both articles lead off (either in the title or the first few sentences of the article) by noting that there are mosque controversies elsewhere than ground zero. That means the reputable sources (not Wikipedia editors all on their lonesome) are making the connections between these mosque controversies and the one about which this page is written. The section is clearly not OR and needs to stay.
0
0
0
0
0
0
12f4077f5245027f
RE: Orphaned non-free image File:RhythmParadise.jpg I just thought it would be useful to include both box arts within the article.
0
0
0
0
0
0
12f43aad8f733f1e
Fraser Mustard Hi there! Thanks for your recent addition. Can you please add a bit to the article to establish Mustard's notability? Right now I don't see why he deserves his own article here... Thanks! | Talk 19:37, Jan 4, 2005 (UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
12f511671fabb77d
I confirmed with JREF that polygraphs and polygraph tests are eligible for the ONE MILLION DOLLARS. Please write to James Randi and ask yourself via [email protected] and you will get it from the horse's mouth himself, so to speak. Polygraphs are not paranormal, but they are useless, worthless, and pseudoscience- and covered by the Randi Challenge. February 28th., +2008 Gregorian Calendar
0
0
0
0
0
0
12f5bb6118aa6853
(or a suitable subarticle)
0
0
0
0
0
0
12f99a75ed7c7fc6
The graphic is nothing less than editor synthesis. Using that as an example only shows how the article has gotten worse. As mentioned several times on the talk page, we need to move away from the synthetic criterion devised by wikipedians to notable lists.
0
0
0
0
0
0
12faa25b38e01dcf
" A kitten for you! Thank you for your support. ) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
12fb16400e675fb6
The only way that what Marc Shepherd said would be done most likely is if there's a Wikiproject for for NYC Transit, MTA, and MaBSTOA buses, which I doubt is needed or wanted.
0
0
0
0
0
0
12fb2bdd2b78929b
Ideas, ideas Hey, how's it goin' Ginkgo100? I had a couple ideas I wanted to bounce off another editor to see what they thought: you’re the editor. Here's what’s going on in my head: First; I was looking at the Bill Ritter (politician) article a little while ago and thinking it was a little dull. You scored that good shot of Ritter at the CDC, and that's about all the color we've got. So, I stopped by Ritter's campaign site (http://www.ritterforgovernor.com) and found a great screenshot off KUSA of the latest poll numbers (drop by and take a look if you can). I thought maybe this might be worth uploading (if applicable; didn't check yet) and using in the Ritter article and Colorado gubernatorial election, 2006. What do you think? In a related thought, I stumbled upon the video of the Ritter/Beauprez debates from Aug. 11 (Here's a link ). Other articles I've read have contained video, but this one might be a little to long (any thoughts?) and may not be material appropriate or applicable to upload onto Wikipedia. Second, I'm going to plunge into a clean-up effort that looks a little challenging over at National Western Stock Show (take a look and you'll see what I mean). If you can, and you like what's one of my favorite events in Denver, drop by the article and help me out a little. Thanks for the help; I've written a lot here, my apologies. See ya' around, have a good one.
0
0
0
0
0
0
12fc1762d4ecde59
Update needed: Rovi vs Acresso Software Someone who knows more about what assets went to Acresso should split the discussion of them out to an article on Acresso, limiting this article to the parts that stayed with Macrovision (now Rovi).
0
0
0
0
0
0
12fc2321e7bd1e06
Is Deepak the ruler of the world? Let me give you people who love this guy/girl Deepak....An idea of what Deepak is like....He must be some really unhappy person......i promoise you this is what it is like in dealing with Deepak. I bring up an issue where im asking why an article does not have more info, or about editing an article, or about taking something out of an article. And Deepak wont allow me to make edits. So I give Deepak examples and information and trying to back up my edits are legit. And Deepak ignores my logic and doesnt give me alot of logic as to why my info is not valid then So I try to figure out why Deepak is being so strcit. I remind him that i backed up what i said. That i had information that was logical. And why my edits are good. And Deepak calls me a troll and insults me and accuses me of being a nazi lover or something So I answer every insult, every accustation , and every put down that Deepak gives me. And then i remind him of why my edits are valid. And Deepak ignores most of what i write and continues to call me a troll. Or a nazi lover. Or other insults. I then get annoyed and ask Deepak why is he ignoring most of my logic that i write down? Why does he pick and choose what he wants to answer? Why does he not give me logic in return? And Deepak wont reply . I then ask other users about making edits and asking them about my logic and giving them my reasons as to why my edits are valid. And some answer and some agree and some dont. And Deepak all of a sudden starts responding again....with logic? No....with answers? no....with reasoning? no....with information? no....he tells the other users that im a troll and a nazi and pro India then . I then answer all of Deepaks insults. I remind him of why i want edits to be made. I give him my information as to why my edits are valid then. And Deepak goes back calling me a troll, and a nazi, and a pro India dude. And this kind of stuff goes on and on and on...you get the idea.....he ignores information you give him. He picks and chooses what he wants to answer. And he doesnt even answer the logic you give him sometimes. But he wastes his time in name calling, and insluts, and putting you down then. So then after a while i get annoyed. And i remind him how things got this bad between us. I type and type and type and type just like i am now. And Deepak ignores most of what i typed. Many times i write him these long replies where i answer all his points, where i tell him why its wrong for him to insult me and put me down, and why its wrong for him to ignore the information i have as to why i want to make an edit, or whatever it is im bringing up then.....and no matter how much i write....even if i write these long replies to him then....even if i answer every point he brings up....he usually either ignores most of what i wrote down....or....he picks and chooses what he wants to answer.....or.....he just responds back by calling me a troll, or accusing me of being pro nazi or something, or accusing me of ignoring his points (which is so not true cus i respond to pretty much everything he says then), or accusing me of not understanding what he is telling me, or just accusing me of being pro India then (which I am) or just insulting me, or just name calling me, or just putting me down. So then after a while i get so annoyed cus he's this a guy here then with me now, and so i start to call him names. I call him a dictator. I call him the ruler of wikiepdia. And I tell him how he ignores my points. And then Deepak tells me how i cant call him names, and how i cant throw mud at him, and how im breaking wikipedia rules So then I ask him how comes its ok for him to name call me and i cant? How come its ok for him to throw mud at me but I cant then? How come its ok for him to break Wikipedia's rules but I can't then? And Deepak has no logical answer....or....he won't respond to those questions that I ask him then . Or he just ignores what i ask him, and goes back to accusing me of being a troll, or acting like im a pro nazi or something then , or just insult's me in general then...... So then I get more annoyed and call him thing's like a dictator, which as you can see here with our history, this is how he acts.....isn't it true?.....he ignores most of my points and picks and chooses what he wants to answer.....sometimes he won't even answer you at all.....and sometime's he just insults you then . So it's logical if get annoyed and call him a dicator right? Wrong....Deepak then holds it against you that your name calling him...and threaten's to block you, or report you, or he just tel
1
0
0
0
0
0
12fcba8d619d3698
" When contributing in future, please try not to create pages you're personally involved in. As the policy says; ""Wikipedia is not for things made up one afternoon"". If it isn't a notable project, which you should've been able to see that this isn't, it shouldn't be included. lds "
0
0
0
0
0
0
12fd08455d6f373f
"I'm sorry you are wrong on both counts. Northumbrian is a different dialect to Geordie as you have said. The other dialects from the area are Makem and Pitmatic. Northumbrian being the accent that is common in the larger part of 'Northumberland'. I being from Northumberland myself actually know what I am talking about. If you live in rural Northumberland, bearing in mind that the shire (as Northumberland is a shire county) is mostly rural, you would have a different dialect to someone from Newcastle, Prudhoe, or Gateshead, as the inhabitants of these places generally speak with a Geordie accent. Also no serious linguist would call all these *different* dialects Geordie. I have heard them grouped as Northumbrian dialects but not Geordie dialects. Calling them Northumbrian is correct for two reasons, one being that all these dialects come from the area that is known as Northumbria (That is Northumberland, Durham, Newcastle...etc..). On the other point you are mistake. England (though not the whole UK) can be (rightly) called a Germanic nation. It is true blood is not the deciding factor as you say (though it is connected in some ways), however traditions, language, laws and history are! England was of course founded by...you guessed it Germanic tribes (whether they are the predominant DNA is besides the point. These tribes were the Angles, Saxons, Jutes and Frisians. You can't deny this as before the English kingdoms, England did not exist. Our language is obviously Germanic (though it has borrowed from other languages over the centuries, it is still West Germanic). Most of our common traditions, such as Yule (Yule itself is a Germanic Word, derived from the Norse Jul) are Germanic, the eating of a Christmas Ham, Mistletoe, Christmas trees, Yule Logs...etc…are all Germanic. Many of our laws come direct from Anglo-Saxon and Danish laws, though I agree many were modified by the Normans, who though descended from Norwegians are not culturally Germanic. As for self-identity, I would say that the English identify themselves with Germanic culture, albeit in a subliminal way, for example the fact that they use Anglo-Saxon to describe themselves is an indication of this. They are identifying with tribes that were Danish and Northern German and thus Germanic so on that score yes the English are a Germanic people. And as you bring up DNA casually, then firstly I will point out that it isn't proven either way whether the Anglo-Saxon DNA is more prominent or whether the British (used in this sense as pre-Anglo-Saxon) is. Different surveys have different results, and none have actually been accepted by all experts. And for the most part many of the newer surveys still show that in the North East of England the Germanic percentage is higher than the British (thus the predominant DNA is Germanic), the main problem is that it cannot be determined whether it is Anglo-Saxon or Danish ""Viking"" blood, but this does not make any difference to whether the blood is Germanic. I don't care whether the Modern English have British or Anglo-Saxon blood as I am partly Norse-Gaelic and partly 'English'...thus being a mix. I just do think that the Anglo-Saxon blood is prominent as do many experts, in North Eastern England. Either way Germanic Blood or British Blood...the English are ethnically Germanic. Note: I am not going to lie and say I am not proud of Germanic Culture as it is obvious (especially by my username), but I do consider myself British as the UK isn't about one ethnicity or culture but about the union of many and I am proud of that also. And by the way there is a good case for Northumbria being one of the more Germanic parts, due in a large part to it's folklore especially it's creatures, that include Dvergar (Which they are actually called...they are Dwarves) and Álfar or more correctly Ælfe (as they are in Old English), who are known by the common English word Elf, but are the older and if I may say more correct type. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1300669d30829076
History 396 outline for Grey Owl Career: 1. Trapper (sub heading under career) His earlier mindset surrounding trapping will be discussed in greater depth, as not much is discussed with regards to how he viewed trapping before his switch to conservationism. His work with the Ojibwa Indians / Guppy Family will be explored as they were critical in his development as a trapper that understood the fragility of the animal ecosystem (Smith, 41) The time of his life spent working and living at the Temagami Inn as a chore-boy will be mentioned as this was one of the events in which Archie first became an observer of the Objibwa way of life. (Smith, 40) His love interest, Angele will also be discussed as she also introduced Archie to influential figures within the Objibwa community, providing Archie with plenty of sketches for his infamous notebooks. (Smith, 42) Braz, Albert. “St. Archie of the Wild. Grey Owl’s Account of His ‘Natural’ Conversion,” in Other Selves: Animals in the Canadian Literary Imagination. ed. Janice Fiamengo, 206-226. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2007. Grey Owl. Pilgrims of the Wild. Toronto: Dundurn Press, 2010. Smith, Donald B. From the Land of Shadows: the Making of Grey Owl. Saskatoon: Western Prairie Books, 1990. 2. Early Conservation Work (sub heading under career) This is my section for the project. From the section on his life as a trapper, we will discuss the impact of Anahareo on his switch from trapper to Conservationist. The transformation of his own personal views of conservationism will be explored through his writings in Pilgrims of the wild. His initial desires to write will also be explored, this section then ending with the completion of his first book “The Men of the Last Frontier” which can be seen as one of the starting points of his public conservation career. Braz, Albert. “St. Archie of the Wild. Grey Owl’s Account of His ‘Natural’ Conversion,” in Other Selves: Animals in the Canadian Literary Imagination. ed. Janice Fiamengo, 206-226. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2007. Grey Owl. Pilgrims of the Wild. Toronto: Dundurn Press, 2010. Smith, Donald B. From the Land of Shadows: the Making of Grey Owl. Saskatoon: Western Prairie Books, 1990. 3. Conservation Work with Parks Board Canada (sub heading under Career) Source matter in this subheading will discuss Grey Owl’s beginning with Parks Board Canada through meeting James Harkin, covering material surrounding the films he made with their support, and his placement as caretaker of park animals at Riding Mountain National Park in Manitoba. His relationship with W. J. Oliver regarding his being commissioned by Parks Board Canada to make films of Grey Owl will also be explored. We will also delve further into his later life as a conservationist and his role in Prince Albert National park. Lanken, Dane. “The Vision of Grey Owl.” Canadian Geographic 119 (1999): 74-80. Smith, Donald B. From the Land of Shadows: the Making of Grey Owl. Saskatoon: Western Prairie Books, 1990. [edit]Conservationist Views (new heading) His outlook on conservationism will be explored, using both Tina Loo’s “States of Nature” Conserving Canada’s Wildlife in the Twentieth Century, and Donald Smith’s “From the Land of Shadows,” and Grey Owl’s “Pilgrims of the Wild” as sources which deal with his mindset of conservationism in detail. Loo, Tina. States of Nature: Conserving Canada’s Wildlife in the Twentieth Century. Vancouver: UBC Press ,2006. Smith, Donald B. From the Land of Shadows: the Making of Grey Owl. Saskatoon: Western Prairie Books, 1990. 4. Conservation Legacy (sub heading under Posthumous recognition) The inspiration his lectures, books and films had on the people who came into contact with them will be explored deeper by using the sources below, as this is an area of his life which is largely overshadowed by the controversy of his false indigenous identity. Billinghurst, Jane. Grey Owl: The Many Faces of Archie Belaney. Vancouver: Greystone Books, 1999. Chapin, David. “Gender and Indian Masquerade in the Life of Grey Owl “ American Indian Quarterly 24 (2000): 91-109. Dawson, Carrie. “Never Cry Fraud: Remebering Grey Owl, Rethinking imposture.” Essays on Canadian Writing 65 (1998): 120-140. Smith, Donald B. From the Land of Shadows: the Making of Grey Owl. Saskatoon: Western Prairie Books, 1990. 5. Death His relationships with Parks Board Canada prior to his death will be explored, delving into such aspects as how his increased use of alcohol, and absence from the park due to his touring prior to his death impacted his relationship with Parks Board. Loo, Tina. States of Nat
0
0
0
0
0
0
1300f5c04c9f573c
. Also, you can ask PaxEquilibrium, another Montenegrin user, if Slobodan Milošević and Vuk Karadžić are Montenegrins by origin
0
0
0
0
0
0
1301038fb249398d
Yeah I checked my keyboard. She did hit E6 and F#5 in chest. She should stay on the category. Im going to add her back on.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1301acb655f3c3b6
Its 100% right and certain that the benefits have been proposed, and self evident from any reference that have proposed them. There also does not exist any reliable refutation of any of the list of proposed benefits. The standard for inclusion as proposed benefits is (or should be) that they are debatable. There is no evidence that they are implausible, and the points are clearly argued. It is the most critical section of the entire article after all, and has been up on the page for about 1 year, for the scrutiny of the entire community. Its likely that any feeling you may have that the information is wrong is misguided, and if you expressed those feelings, you'd have an opportunity to learn from the community why those feelings may be in a weaker debating position than some of the proposed benefits.
0
0
0
0
0
0
130237d30e6747b1
I am Nancy and I like to fuck up people's fun.
1
0
1
0
0
0
13027af8e072ad6f
read the notability guidelines (there is a link in the box)
0
0
0
0
0
0
13036cc0bdefd1ca
Contested deletion This page should not be speedily deleted because... it is very important that other people are not robbed by this predator, and i feel it is my duty to warn them.
0
0
0
0
0
0
13059c277ea800a6
" Hu12 administrator apparent libel and abuse Report to a Chair: Hello, this is a request to review an apparently libelous and abusive comment made about a living person at the talk page for Mount Hood, done by administrator Hu12. Toward the bottom at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mount_Hood#Climbing_Records The issue stems from, as you'll see in the article's history section, my interest in adding a simple climbing record listing for Dan Howitt, with the press article references. Hu12's post: After going through the ""google results"" (a disturbing education of sorts), there appears to be a long line of aliases for Dan Howitt, posting over various websites and forums promoting himself and besmirching the characters of fellow climbers and related. Appears this is an attempt to use wikipedia to import offsite conflicts and further an adjenda. It has been removed. I'd suggest that Dan Howitt read the following, Wikipedia:Wikipedia is in the real world and Law Of Unintended ConsequencesHu12 My reply: Please remove Hu12's Libel and Vandalism above and please report this user's abuse to Wikipedia administration. Also, Hu12 of the ""google results"" you searched most are in support of Dan Howitt, with tons of his official summit photos on Rainier, Adams, Hood, Shasta, and listings of his timing officials. You strangely give weight to the abusive chat-site gossip and unsupported libel, and your own post above is of that nature. Chat-sites with this sort of conduct are sad. I'm reporting your libel and abuse to the wiki administration.Saffron1x (talk) Note Hu12 cites a link above as support for his allegations of Dan Howitt. In reading the chat-site thread, and note it's a mere chat-site and has a lot of personal attacks, gossip, unfounded content, libel, etc, you will, nevertheless, find considerable support for Howitt including climbing record photos, timing officials names, etc. Hu12 emphasizes the allegations about the use of aliases, and this is gossip and unsupported."
0
0
0
0
0
0
1305ce1689aa1f9d
" Can someone straighten out this sentence? The line reads: In addition, Russian government reportedly lobbied against the legislature acting through a public relations company led by Kenneth Duberstein. I suspect ""legislature"" should be ""legislation"" but am not sure. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
130600bdc559d5ed
" On a slightly different note, care to have a look at I've been playing with? I've seen it, quite nice. ) — (?) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
130615219ac8bc68
" polytheism unless you can make a citation for polytheism i will remove it in the next week, it is very misleading, and infact, the cited ""sky god"" and the monotheistic zoroastrian and vedas and general mono-theistic spirituality of the PIE's does not support this polytheism. infact, polytheism is a bad word, as god(the oneness, that which can be no greater) is completely different from gods, and thus you can have deities or ""gods"" yet still be mono-theistic.. only really the abrahamic religions ban this deity and call it ""paganism"". anyway, please remove polytheism, or cite it! "
0
0
0
0
0
0
13062f482359c6a9
Sabahaddin is I think an important enough figure to justify the existence of an article, but why on earth is the article entitled Prens Sabahaddin? 'Prens' seems to be some non-English form of 'Prince', so surely it should be either Prince Sabahaddin (or Sabaheddin or however we want to transliterate it) or some other variant on his name.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1306608b07d790b0
" Cadaver sanguisugus Hi, do you have a scholarly source for the term ""cadaver sanguisugus"" having been used at least once by William de Newburgh or anyone else? I notice that there are a lot of Google hits on vampire forums etc., but according to this paper, only the word ""sanguisuga"" occurs, and it is translated by historian James Carley as ""a leech"". In the Medieval sourcebook edition of Newburgh, the sentence reads ""The young men, however, spurred on by wrath, feared not, and inflicted a wound upon the senseless carcass, out of which incontinently flowed such a stream of blood, that it might have been taken for a leech filled with the blood of many persons."" "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1306ca7afcc3f7fb
My apologies, Bushranger, on not notifying - this whole thing with this back and forth protesting is new to me, and I'm not up on the protocol. If I had know, I'd have notified you. Also I'd like to mention, what I said about that particular editor was not meant as a personal attack, but rather more of a possible statement of fact. But I'll take your advice and keep that type of talk out of it. Thank you.
0
0
0
0
0
0
13073f8555709638
He kinda got it right. Stop spamming his talk page. It's very mature.
0
0
0
0
0
0
13078c4069ad457f
Welcome. I stumbled on it when I started to work on the endangered sites.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1307abe96dc52935
" The problem is you forgot to close the column list with two ""}"" symbols. (talk / [[Special:Contributions/SNUGGUMS|edits]]) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1307fa21a863c606
You would understand... You would understand if you had arse face haemorrhoids!
1
0
1
0
1
0
130838c0d7fd8ca2
i think you should have talked then revert my artilce and there is nothing i have add from my side?i come with source and i have books and still if you want to reveart then talk before it. Please
0
0
0
0
0
0
13087c84c3a74635
" Give a reason when you accuse someone of vandalism I got a message telling me I got blocked. I made 2 changes on the same page, correcting the mispelled word ""brian"" into brain, and changing a wrong reference to the correct one. So please tell me, what the fuck is your problem ?"
0
0
0
0
0
0
1308c8f69855b3a3
yep, he doesn't stop talking crap!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111111111111111111111111111111oneoneoneone
1
0
0
0
0
0
130bf0cafb548a89
SuPeRTR0LL WiLL LiVe FoReVeR! iF You DoN'T ReSPeCT THe SuPeRTR0LL You WiLL Die You PaTHeTiC FooL! SuPeRTR0LL WiLL LiVe FoReVeR! iF You DoN'T ReSPeCT THe SuPeRTR0LL You WiLL Die You PaTHeTiC FooL! SuPeRTR0LL WiLL LiVe FoReVeR! iF You DoN'T ReSPeCT THe SuPeRTR0LL You WiLL Die You PaTHeTiC FooL! SuPeRTR0LL WiLL LiVe FoReVeR! iF You DoN'T ReSPeCT THe SuPeRTR0LL You WiLL Die You PaTHeTiC FooL! SuPeRTR0LL WiLL LiVe FoReVeR! iF You DoN'T ReSPeCT THe SuPeRTR0LL You WiLL Die You PaTHeTiC FooL! SuPeRTR0LL WiLL LiVe FoReVeR! iF You DoN'T ReSPeCT THe SuPeRTR0LL You WiLL Die You PaTHeTiC FooL! SuPeRTR0LL WiLL LiVe FoReVeR! iF You DoN'T ReSPeCT THe SuPeRTR0LL You WiLL Die You PaTHeTiC FooL! SuPeRTR0LL WiLL LiVe FoReVeR! iF You DoN'T ReSPeCT THe SuPeRTR0LL You WiLL Die You PaTHeTiC FooL! SuPeRTR0LL WiLL LiVe FoReVeR! iF You DoN'T ReSPeCT THe SuPeRTR0LL You WiLL Die You PaTHeTiC FooL! SuPeRTR0LL WiLL LiVe FoReVeR! iF You DoN'T ReSPeCT THe SuPeRTR0LL You WiLL Die You PaTHeTiC FooL! SuPeRTR0LL WiLL LiVe FoReVeR! iF You DoN'T ReSPeCT THe SuPeRTR0LL You WiLL Die You PaTHeTiC FooL! SuPeRTR0LL WiLL LiVe FoReVeR! iF You DoN'T ReSPeCT THe SuPeRTR0LL You WiLL Die You PaTHeTiC FooL! SuPeRTR0LL WiLL LiVe FoReVeR! iF You DoN'T ReSPeCT THe SuPeRTR0LL You WiLL Die You PaTHeTiC FooL! SuPeRTR0LL WiLL LiVe FoReVeR! iF You DoN'T ReSPeCT THe SuPeRTR0LL You WiLL Die You PaTHeTiC FooL! SuPeRTR0LL WiLL LiVe FoReVeR! iF You DoN'T ReSPeCT THe SuPeRTR0LL You WiLL Die You PaTHeTiC FooL! SuPeRTR0LL WiLL LiVe FoReVeR! iF You DoN'T ReSPeCT THe SuPeRTR0LL You WiLL Die You PaTHeTiC FooL! SuPeRTR0LL WiLL LiVe FoReVeR! iF You DoN'T ReSPeCT THe SuPeRTR0LL You WiLL Die You PaTHeTiC FooL! SuPeRTR0LL WiLL LiVe FoReVeR! iF You DoN'T ReSPeCT THe SuPeRTR0LL You WiLL Die You PaTHeTiC FooL! SuPeRTR0LL WiLL LiVe FoReVeR! iF You DoN'T ReSPeCT THe SuPeRTR0LL You WiLL Die You PaTHeTiC FooL! SuPeRTR0LL WiLL LiVe FoReVeR! iF You DoN'T ReSPeCT THe SuPeRTR0LL You WiLL Die You PaTHeTiC FooL! SuPeRTR0LL WiLL LiVe FoReVeR! iF You DoN'T ReSPeCT THe SuPeRTR0LL You WiLL Die You PaTHeTiC FooL! SuPeRTR0LL WiLL LiVe FoReVeR! iF You DoN'T ReSPeCT THe SuPeRTR0LL You WiLL Die You PaTHeTiC FooL! SuPeRTR0LL WiLL LiVe FoReVeR! iF You DoN'T ReSPeCT THe SuPeRTR0LL You WiLL Die You PaTHeTiC FooL!
1
0
1
1
1
0
130c0ffea46ccc20
Image source problem with Image:MeritInConstructionTroops1stClass.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:MeritInConstructionTroops1stClass.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
0
0
0
0
0
0
130c2cf74320bf96
" You clearly doesn’t understand that Conesus means that every editor must agree. (It´s fair to ask the question if you are a bit illiterate? or isn´t English your born language) Clearly I don’t agree with you. Wikipedia is primarily about making new correct and useful information public for a brooder amount of people quicker than ordinary dictionaries. Do you agree we have ""Conesus"" on the above"
0
0
0
0
0
0
130c316307054db6
" PP Depardieu urgent Hi, was just checking thru' the versions to find the last good one when you pp'ed the article, yes this is what is needed, unfortunately I had to restore the last good version as there was so much shite (he's Russian, the IPA to pronounce his name was changed to rRussian, Russian flags etc.). So your PP has disappeared, would you mind popping back and doing that again? Cheers! Parley! "
0
0
0
0
0
0
130cdfb73276440d
"No AD hominen here, just stating what seems to be the case. Sounds to me like some people want the article to be ""protected"" so that it can't be evolved or expanded to more accurately reflect accuracy and NPOV regarding jew watch.com. Right now JW is not NPOV, its JPOV (biased). Just read the first sentence, that immediately informs you it is JPOV (biased). The first statement is a lie. Jew Watch is NOT an anti-semitic site, it is an honest site, or an accurate site, but not anti-semitic. I sense your unfair desire to ""protect"" the site is to protect the feelings of a certain group. The minor vandalism here and there is no excuse to try to block or protect the page. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
130e02ce5427f691
, 12 April 2011 (UTC) You are only now presenting sources for some of the information which you have inserted. In your last revision of the article, you did not cite the sentence about fundamentalism. Once again, the statement about public schools and ID materials was unsourced when you first added it, which is why I removed it. Upon further examination, I removed the statement again because the article never explictly stated that the Centre for Intelligent Design was responsible for the distribution of these intelligent design materials to public schools. It is actually very unlikely that this Centre for Intelligent design did so, in light of the fact that the government proclamation was issued in 2006, and this organization arose in 2010. Finally, believing in the historicity of Adam and Eve does not make one a fundamentalist. Many Christians reconcile the Genesis creation narrative with science (see the BioLogos Foundation for example, which advocates evolutionary creation). The entire Roman Catholic Church (1 billion people) teaches the historicity of Adam and Eve and that does not make them Young Earth Creationists or fundamentalists. I have filed a case on this dispute here and encourage your participation in it. I hope this helps. Thanks, Talk 08:23
0
0
0
0
0
0
130e28b799977c5d
A ban for Kontoreg, eh? It was merely a matter of time, to be honest.
0
0
0
0
0
0
130e95dc5400299d
" You and Your Uncivil Friends Refuted Your Uncivil Friends Refuted Or were you saying something to the over 300 people who've downloaded this refutation of you're lies?: http://www.mininova.org/tor/1264745 And so that everyone can see part of it here: JoshuaZ said: ""Starfire, as I tried to explain to you Wikipedia cares about reliable sources and verifiability, not truth. Now, if you read that guideline, you may understand why in general AIG and many of the other sources you used are not reliable sources."" Hey JoshuaZ the liar, where does Wikipedia's policy say that AnswersInGensis.org is not a reliable source? Where JoshuaZ the vandal and liar? Show us. So you think saying, ""Now"" is scientific evidence that you are a wise and intelligent teller of the truth or that you know what a reliable and verifiable source is? JoshuaZ, where does Wikipedia's policy say that the Jacob Sheep Association = a reliable and verifiable source that Jacob Sheep are biologically primitive you hypocrite? Explain that hypocrite who personally attacked Starfire777 using lies. Show your references JoshuaZ. Saying, ""Now"" is not a reference that your accusations are true are they? Why can't you make sense Joshua? Again, where did those verses prophecy anything? Do these look like prophecies JoshuaZ?: Joshua also said: ""In this case, they did have sources, so you have even less of an argument."" Wrong JoshuaZ. Simply citing sources as you yourself said does not make the source valid. It must be substantiated and verifiable. Why do you conveniently forget that you smug babbling hypocrite? Your later comments don't merit much of a response, but I wThen he said: ""ill simply note that accusing people of bigotry, bias, hypocrisy, irrationality and trolling makes my earlier comment about not using ""Darwinist"" as a slur somewhat irrelevant;"" Because you said so JoshuaZ, and whatever you said is true is true because you said so. So much for references eh? All you have to do is accuse and it makes you right, right hypocrite? See how you go round and round in circles using circular reasoning? ""if your earlier comment toed the line, the one above crosses it."" Because you said so JoshuaZ, and whatever you say is true because you said so. Science! ""I suggest you calm down"" I suggest you not use sarcastic insults like that, ok hypocrite? You're implying that the Starfire777 is ill-tempered merely because he points out that you are hypocrite and uses logic to do so (as well as verifiable references on Answersingenesis.com which you lied about not being reliable and being against Wikipedia's rules to cite), ok liar? I suggest you also not command a Christian to follow your moral standards over Christ's, over God's. He is a Christian don't ya know? Are you now God to tell him how to feel and think? I suggest you read this verse and take it to heart which millions of Christians know very well so that you learn how not to offend them again: ""Be angry and do not sin; do not let the sun go down on your anger, and give no opportunity to the devil."" - Ephesians 4:26-27 Last time I checked JoshuaZ, neither your nor Wikipedia's rules superceded God's. ""and read the relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines while you wait for your block to expire."" Oh the old ""you need to read it but I don't"" and ""you sit and think while your grounded young man"" insults. What an arrogant, childish hypocrite you are. I suggest that you stop pretending that whatever you say is true merely because you said it, and again, learn what Starfire777 properly told you to learn. I'll enhance the list for you: Reference, evidence, truth, reality, lie, bigot, hypocrite, fallacy, circular reasoning, troll, stalking, harassment, insults, hatred, and love. And Joshua also said: ""This is in addition to issues of original research in regard to Biblical prophecies and other issues on the Charles Darwin page."" Wow you sure like to weasel-word: ""other issues""? What are you references for this vague ""other issues"" JoshuaZ the Policy Master of Wikpedia? And Joshua, who said anything about prophecies? Where did Starfire777 say anothing about prophecies? No JoshuaZ the wannabe scholar, he said ""predicted"" in the same way that science can be used to predict the outcome of an experiment. If your lazy-brained truth-careless self had been paying attention to what he said CARE FULL Y you might have noticed that the verses were using PAST TENSE JOSHUA, not FUTURE TENSE JOSHUA. If you are unable to tell the difference between past tense and futur
0
0
0
0
0
0
130f30dd7e21c4e8
Thanks! I actually just came back from a long wikibreak to see this.
0
0
0
0
0
0
130f3115b0358880
" Ward Churchill Admits that He is a Lying SOB Dear , Ward Churchill admitted in front of dozens of reporters and in front of TV cameras, last night, February 22, 2005, that he is NOT in fact an Indian. He has been lying about his heritage for many, many years and people like me, who live and work in Indian Country everyday, have known for years that he was out and out lying about his heritage. I repeat: Ward Churchill during his speech at the University of Hawaii admitted that he is NOT an Indian. The comment, word for word, was published in the Honolulu Star-Bulletin, Vol. 10, Issue 54Wednesday, February 23, 2005 Churchill attacks essay’s critics by Craig Gima. I'm going to attempt to be gracious but I have to say that you and missed the boat on this one. I'm not going to do it tonight because I do need sleep, but there is going to be huge re-write of the article tomorrow because the article is just flat out wrong now. These ""allegations"" of ""fabrications"" have been provable facts of fabrications. It calls into questions so many other things about the guy. What other things is he out and out lying about??? But more importantly the way that the section on his fake Indian heritage needs to be completely re-written. Considering the arrogant and sanctimous way that he has treated people like me in Indian Country who dared to question his Indian heritage claims over the years, I think that Indian heritage section needs to play a more centralized role in the article and tomorrow that role is coming. So many peoplewho do NOT even live in Indian Country, who do NOT work in Indian Countrymade the claim that to dare question the great Ward Churchill's fake Indian heritage was a ""cheap shot."" We have been hearing that from non-Indians for many, many years and now Churchill has admitted that he lied about it for over 20 years. He claims that it merely a misunderstanding created by some sloppy reporters. That is a damn lie too. He has been claiming Indian heritage for over 20 years. It is written on either the front cover or back cover of his numerous books. He refers to the fake Indian scam in newspaper article after newspaper article. He committed fraud when he applied to the University of Colorado. The Denver Post has published his employment application and on that application he claimed that he is Indian for affirmation action purposes. That is a damned lie. There is going to be re-write and Jodi Rave's comments are going back in and all the rest. Your attempts to stifle the topic has ended by Churchill himself.- 04:12, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)"
0
0
0
0
0
0
130f54878e4400d9
OK let's meet for a beer. Name the place and time.
0
0
0
0
0
0
130f93a4556c0625
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Diplodocus, you will be blocked from editing. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
0
0
0
0
0
0
130fafb378beeda5
Tag Teams Should Finlay and Hornswoggle still be a tag team,they haven't teamed up for a long time now and Hornswoggle only appears to be his sidekick/mananger?
0
0
0
0
0
0
13106e5e1342029c
IP addresses constantly change so several unrelated articles edited by various individuals may link back to the same address, though you and your socialist comrades are so full of venomous pro-brown, anti-white hatred and paranoia that what I just stated will probably never register in your feeble Raza mind. Stupid wetback, you're just preserving and creating more resentment against your kind.
1
0
0
0
1
0
1310786dde5f1371
Nor, oddly a dictatorship where lonesome boys get off on meaningless power trips. ColScott
0
0
0
0
0
0
1311064768db0d16
" Hadn't seen that. A lot of material to cover. I am getting an education. ) But I'll be be plain. There has has been a lot of ""quotation mining"" on this page from various POVs. It is what directed me to start reading TALK in the first place and to decide to start editing myself. Good wiki pages demonstrate a synthesis of sources. It is easy to spot when that is not happening, particularly if you have ever been involved in collaborative writing before. A few quick reference checks on the stinkiest stuff - such as Grover Whitehurst appearing to skewer David Elkind - proves that it is happening. All subject matter aside, I detest this. If someone takes the time to write an academic article, or produce a journalistic piece, or enter into a public point/counterpoint debate, others who want to reproduce their thoughts have a moral obligation to summarize the original source authentically. Criticism of it is obviously fine, but only after the original piece has been accurately summarized. IMHO. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1312b5eeff28d9d7
" {| width=""100%"" style=""background:transparent"" {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#"" |style=""width: 50%; border:1px solid #; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| Hello Packo z007, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -talk- -contribs- {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#"" |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#"" ! Getting help |- |style=""color:#000""| Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages [[Wikipedia:New contributors' help page|New co
0
0
0
0
0
0
1314a0a252fe123c
Says you. That's your opinion only. All of the many editors who have reverted that content for four years disagree with you. And no content is acceptable if the sourcing fails or if it's unsourced. And vocal ranges are most certainly not lead-worthy. If you want to discuss this, do it on your talk page, not mine. 76.189.121.57
0
0
0
0
0
0
1316988fe802e623
" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Barbed wire. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. —αἰτίας •discussion• "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1316d7b2d65a8b13
" I don't know the context, but you might find this Netmask calculator of some use. Unfortunately, all the other bookmarks in my ""Networking utilities"" Favorites folder seem to have fallen out of use. Hth! — 14:44, Jun 30, 2004 (UTC) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
13178d5683b114ff
Your source come from a Greek anti Albanian website go to the main page and read all the anti Albanian slogans you are going to tell me tats a valid source
0
0
0
0
0
0
1318566af9790b98
There are no third party sources. And the ones I've checked out are mostly unreliable. Just because something is written in a book does not mean it's a scholarly source or even correct. If you were to rely on your beloved rules, there would be almost NOTHING written on this page. Is that how you would prefer it? To follow your beloved rules only? I think nobody would agree with this.
0
0
0
0
0
0
131865ded38c674a
Good idea. Let's continue the discussion at Talk:György Paál.
0
0
0
0
0
0
131874cf58327b32
Thanks for the reply, but i made the suggestion to the editor of the board but he would not listen or even discuss the issue, i have stated that the editor has maintained his own personal views into the article. The editor stated i should go and seek this dispute resolution, because as far as he is concerned he doesnt want anything that he doesnt agree with on articles linked to sikhism, which i deem very one sided and a bit intolerant. Thanks, i would like this issue sorted, i have offered to create an orthodox and unorthodox section on diet in sikhism, i have presented the same scholars that where in the original article, that the editor cited himself, yet when i cited the same scholars to show that they themselves agree that their are passages against meat and many sects against it, the current editor of diet in sikhism again took it off. How can a person cite a scholar and then reject my use of the same scholar when it doesnt fit in with his own POV, which he stated as only being orthodox. I know wiki also has information on Shia unorthodox sect of islam, does that mean we only adhere to one persons view on sikhism, when that person has cited sholars that openly admit that their are passages against meat, if that is the case then why cant relevant verses be shown? Thanks again, i only reponded on here, because to be honest im getting lost with all the forms on wikipedia.lol.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1318abb3934e3eec
Why not block that cunt Samsara for being a pedantic, know-nothing twat? Oh, I guess probably because you're one yourself - and you guys have got to stick together.
1
0
0
0
0
0
1319d9975b24684a
Nihonjoe, in my understanding of your role as one of Tenmei's mentors approved by the Arbitration committee, you're supposed to help the air of any discussion between Tenmei and others. Of course, if you have concerns about my presentation skills, I would be gladly accept your criticism if you leave that comment at my talk page. I think your above personalized comment is not very helpful for the discussion. As for your assertion of [WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS]], the method is already used by Tenmei with the three non-English Wikipedias. I'm bit worried that you don't see that. Everyone can challenge the trustworthiness of Wikipedia projects and as stated, Wikipedia is not a reference. How can you prove that the argument that the title used in the three Wikipedias are more neutral and usage of WP:ENGLISH based on what? We don't know where each title at each Wikipedia follows Wikipedia naming convention rules correctly. I think the mention of Oei Invasion is a good comparison for Tenemi to see how he treats similar subjects differently. Also I totally disagree with your view on the Tenmei's mentions the non-English Wikipedias.Caspian blue
0
0
0
0
0
0
131ace6df62f149c
as written in the article.
0
0
0
0
0
0
131b8246d4b125d5
Yeah no, quote policy on that is that's true, or admit your COI in support of Melaleuca. I will take this to the admin noticeboard if you continue to abuse your status. No admin is supposed to revert within minutes with no chance to expand an article. How many hundreds of Melaleuca articles do you doubt are out there?
0
0
0
0
0
0
131ba72e3a6f323a
"==Dean Esmay== I wonder if you realised that Dean Esmay (apparent inventor of the ""Taqiyya Libel"") is also an AIDS dissident? Just seemed like a strange coincidence. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
131d050ccf39b1c6
" Replaceable fair use Image:Frex denver.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Frex denver.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
131e070d706f0de8
I appreciate you wanting to get an article on World Childcare going and including it at the Child Sponsorship page. However, you cannot list it until the article has been started which requires establishing notability. If you read WP:NOTABILITY and then post me some links to news articles I will have a go at starting it for you. talk
0
0
0
0
0
0
131ecfebc2753d7e
You must stop adding names to the G-Unit Records page without a source. If you continue, you will be reported and possibly blocked. EØ Ŧ''''''
0
0
0
0
0
0
1321310ef9fe46db
The images do have valid reasoning for their existance in the fair use claims. Challenge them first before tagging them. You own behaviour is much closer to vandalism than mine
0
0
0
0
0
0
1321978635bdcf58
" Perhaps I seem to be repeating myself as you are repeatedly ignoring what I'm writing. The tables are unclear as the order of the product is unclear from them. E.g. the top-right corner of the first table is e6. But does that mean e1 × e7 = e6 or e7 × e1 = e6 ? It would not matter if the product is commutative but as it's not the tables are ambiguous. That is why tables are a very poor way to show the product, and probably why none of the sources use them. And again please read MOS:LEAD in paticular the section on providing an accessible overview. Or look at the articles already mentioned, Special relativity and Cross product. Or one you are familiar with, Pythagorean theorem. Or a similarly advanced article to this one (and a featured article), Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector. There should be little or no maths in the introduction: perhaps a statement of the product, but nothing else. Certainly not the page of detailed mathematical working and argument that there is now.wordsdeeds "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1321a33670f78a53
I created this article on the court-rank of Constantinople, the Spatharius.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1321f64ce94e81b4
" Ditto. Anna Lincoln "
0
0
0
0
0
0
13222ac51c6998c6
" Is this map accurate? = I see some problems with this map: 1- It seems to me that this map only shows the very first homo-sapiens immigrations, not the further ones... 1a- For example, regarding New Zealand, this map shows the islands being occupied by melanesian peoples that I suppose to be the morioris, while we know the maoris (the ones who come after the morioris and decimated them) were actually Polinesian... 1b- Europe is shown being occupied by settlers from Anatolia, those were the certainly the Paleo-Europeans... This map does not show the further occupation of Europe by the Indo-Europeans who originated in the Caspian Basin, migrated to Europe and pushed the Paleoeuropeans westards and southwards. 1c- The Brazilian Amerindians are not of Colombian ancestry, they are either of Caribbean origin (the Caribs and Arawaks) or of Paraguayan-Northern-Argentine origin (the Tupi-Guaranis). The bulk of the Amerindians who were in Brazil about the time of the arrival of the Portuguese were these Tupi-Guaranis. They came from Paraguay and spread all over the Brazilian coast till the valley of the Amazon River. When you show a map where Brazilian Amerindians are all coming from Colombia, you are showing a totally contradictory information. 1d- The Dravidians reached India from Ethiopia to Yemen, from Yemen to Oman, from Oman to Southeast Iran, from Southeast Iran to the Valley of Indus. What is shown on that map is that the route of the occupation of India by the Indo-Europeans (from Iran through Bactria). 1e- The hipothesis of ancient waves of Paleoeuroepan settling in the eastern coast of North America is ignored, while some geneticists have found evidences of that due to the existance of the Mithocondrial gene ""X"" (""Xenia"") among North-American Native Americans. 1f- This map also seems to ignore the Australoid migrations to South America, some people claim that the Australoids have reached South America before the Mongoloids due to some archeological findings in Brazil. Anyways, I believe it should be explained that the migrations of the homo-sapiens show on that map are only the first, the early migrations, and the route of their early settling in India should be corrected. Also, I would suggest a second map, showing further homo-sapiens migrations (now including the Maori migration from Polinesia, the correct migrations in South America and the settling of the Indo-Europeans in Europe. 189.25.2.194 R. Alberto"
0
0
0
0
0
0
13227a76d3890059
Please don't spam my userpage I paid for this IP thanks, so please don't splash slanderous remarks across the userpage. I certainly didn't tag yours with Template:ArrogantTechnocrat
0
0
0
0
0
0
1323c25e80c16595
aryour retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded your retarded ticle
1
0
0
0
0
0
1323c8e6a6fb3cda
D-38 Martin Guitar?? My Family has a Black Martin Guitar...Stamped inside on end of neck is D-38...139883 I have researched and can not find a D-38... can anyone please help?
0
0
0
0
0
0
1323ec486c94b4bb
No as the CTB article has more detail and had quite enough sources to sustain a stand-alone article. This page is now a summary article as per WP:SUMMARY.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1324761a883bcd3a
" I must quote what Dominus wrote some time ago on my talk page when I translate I use ""Province of Lower Silesia"" etc. However, here on Wikipedia, I have to go with decisions made long ago. The problem is that Wikipedia is increasingly used for reference by people who are not translators. They should be aware that in ""real life"" the use of ""voivodeship"" results in confusion, as foreigners usually have no idea what this word means. Some Polish people may not care about it because Polish is a reader-responsible language, so Polish authors do not need to write understandably because readers are responsible for understanding. By contrast, English is a writer-responsible language, i.e. writers in English are responsible for making their texts understandable. (I wrote about the classification and some other problems related to translation in my article, pages 101-104). Importantly, this is reflected in the Wikipedia Manual of Style, as one of the five general principles of Wikipedia is Clarity: Writing should be clear and concise. Plain English works best: avoid jargon, and vague or unnecessarily complex wording. ""Voivodeship"" is jargon, understandable nearly exclusively to Polish people. I started a similar discussion in Wikipedia many years ago but I was quickly defeated by people saying that a consensus has been reached and now it's too late. I wish I was more experienced then and knew that ""voivodeship"" is against the principles of Wikipedia. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1324e2f0ecac5d41
What the fuck man? Why the hell do you care whether or not Lucas Biespiel gets to be on wikipedia. All I wanted to do was to give a little info on the guys music for people who might be interested.
1
0
1
0
0
0
13252155d243e142
" No problem. What are friends for? ' (T · C ·' E) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
13260fe5e5f8f4bc
. Just click on any of those links in that Gallery, depending on which category of userbox you are interested in
0
0
0
0
0
0
1326e1122fd8155d
Then the inaccurate bitch is going to win, because this doesn't end til I am forced to bow or am banned.
1
0
0
0
0
0
13280e0bc51e71ca
" I've said it before and I'll say it again. I've been dragged through WQA a couple of times that I can remember, but I'd never bother to do it to anyone else. It's just a pathetic waste of time; ""Mummy, Mummy, Malleus was rude to me."" Live with it bitch. Fatuorum "
1
0
1
0
0
0
132864ca0f6cbedd
" Bold text'Italic text[[[Link title] [[Media:Media:Example.ogg#REDIRECT [[Insert text]]]] ]]'''"
0
0
0
0
0
0
1328772fd964f3f4
It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from . Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. |queta!|Suggestions?
0
0
0
0
0
0
132892c7358b6098
" I've downdownloaded Huggle again but every time I start it up it revises the configuration file. Any ideas how I can stop it doing this. talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
132a4e4f500b114e
" Resent. To be clear, we have sent the e-mail to the same address as you initially mailed from. If you require the message to be sent to a different address, please let me know. I'd also be grateful if you could note here that you have received the e-mail, as otherwise my client may be misbehaving, or something else may be going wrong. Regards, [•] "
0
0
0
0
0
0
132a7f161e51a24a
" Thank you! Haha I am a fan of Rescue Heroes, and I'm 20. It's not like Barney & Friends since it doesn't have stuff on going to the doctor or anything like that, and it's not like Dora The Explorer since it doesn't say things like ""Do You See The Red Ball?"" I know from having to babysit for some kids sometimes, and besides, they showed how to put out a Grease Fire in one episode, what Four-Year-Old Would be allowed to do that? Anyway, thanks for telling me why you put the unreferenced tag there, you telling me was a big help. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
132b761f7b354026
" — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
132d009fd2d78c3c
Kill the Muslim suporter of palastinians/terrorists
1
0
0
0
0
0
132d30099d28bda5
" thank you 157.130.162.178 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching! Spread the goodness of cookies by adding to their talk page with a friendly message. thank you for talking and not just giving me a auotmated response or deleting me ur the first one who did that and thats y im giving you this cookie"
0
0
0
0
0
0