id
stringlengths 16
16
| comment_text
stringlengths 6
5k
| toxic
int64 0
1
| severe_toxic
int64 0
1
| obscene
int64 0
1
| threat
int64 0
1
| insult
int64 0
1
| identity_hate
int64 0
1
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1162c10b813a5a28
|
Lol, my major issue P:)) спойт
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1163847041f1a233
|
"
So, let me get this straight. You'd still like to compete, but you missed twelve hours of it, so you don't think you can catch up, and want out? You're not even going to try? TC "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11649862323e150c
|
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs).
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1164d666808b62fc
|
Yep, and after you vandalized it again, I re-reverted it, dipshit.
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11651925e660660f
|
hi. this is a place where you can leave a message for me.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
116620a24af4c0a5
|
Thanks for the praise. I'm taking Wikipedia a lot more seriously now than I used to. I have to admit that a few months ago I did silly things like vandalize articles. I never really didn't anything slanderous, just silly and stupid stuff. Recently, I've been doing my best to contribute positively to Wikipedia and I've even been correcting the same sort of vandalism I used to take part in.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1166ba7734473382
|
"
Reply from ColonelHenry
I have been pissed this week, I admit. Why?
First, last week, I get harassed by one hypocritical ""rule nazi"" editor taking things too far (SummerPhD) so when I pointed out her similar shortcomings and intransigence and said frankly ""this user is an asshole"" and explain why and state ""this is the kind of user that drives editors away from wikipedia"" I get blocked for 24-hours. I say ""asshole"" once, I get blocked. She calls me a ""dick"" over a dozen times, and gets warned. Go figure. I hate nitpicking rule nazis because they end up proving themselves to be hypocrites, and unfortunately without fool other meek fools who tend to be admins tend to side with the rule nazi.
In the midst of that Daniel Case continued to plow ahead insisting on a rushed revision of ALONJ that no one else raised as a concern (so, not immediately dire) after being asked first politely and respectfully several times to ""wait until after TFA"" and he still ignored it. If someone politely asked me to wait a few days before doing a drastic edit on an article they worked on that was getting a little attention, I would...because I find it akin to telling a concert pianist to change their entire concert programme an hour before the recital. Only when I responded in anger did he pull back on the reins and realize ""hey, maybe I should wait till after TFA."" A little deference on his part would have gone a long way. I'm not averse to his edits, but seriously, after TFA would have been more than fine. I considered it insulting, and his refusal to listen to a polite request stated by both myself and the other major contributor to the article was considerably disrespectful.
And then when the article I've worked on becomes TFA we get inundated with constant vandalism and petty edits that were not necessary (i.e. people like you, Kevjonesin, insisting on 19th instead of nineteenth). Is that really a necessary place to make a stand and pick a fight? Seriously, don't you have better things to do with your time? I'd rather argue over an analysis of Hegel's influence on Nietzsche's ""Will to Power"" or Hindu mysticism in Eliot's Four Quartets than bicker about things as meaningless as whether honour should be spelled -or or -our.
As for why, I like ""nineteenth"" as opposed to 19th, several style guides (including Chicago/Turabian) advocates it, and growing up I was taught that all numbers under 20 should be spelled out. Whether cutting two dozen letters from an article going to 19th and 20th is going to make a difference for ""brevity's sake"" on a 40-page article, is a lame claim and frankly a waste of time for both of us. I like the aesthetic of it spelled out, it's allowed, and the option of spelling it out is a bonus in an article to avoid confusion with too many other numbers. When considering such an unnecessary subjective edit, deference should be made to style set by the editors who spent months on an article...and when nothing is wrong to it, deference is entirely warranted. That isn't ownership, it's just courtesy and good judgment. After all, if I stood in your yard while you were painting your house gray and proceeded to insist you to paint your house orange, you'd tell me to ""kick rocks.""
As far as I'm concerned, this is over. Move on. I am not addressing this any further, because nonsense like this keeps me from contributing and convinces me to leave Wikipedia again, and this time for good. If Hell is other people, Wikipedia constantly proves itself to be the eighth and ninth circle. "
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1166fe0dec1d3fa1
|
This article could be improved by merely adding easily findable references, but the author seemingly doesn't care for WP:Notability or WP:Verifiability
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11684c3532674385
|
It's the sources that matter to me. Now, do have GNU/Linux naming controversy that discusses this and, yes, consensus is important. However, for this package, I would side with the GNU/Linux side, but not all.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1168b4c600db2ce9
|
"
Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/History_and_geography
The following RfC was posted earlier today in order to end this dispute once and for all. I trust that Philip Gronowski will abide by the decision of the administrator who makes a decision concerning my dispute.
Rossville, Staten Island - As part of an ongoing edit war, has been arbitrarily reverting all additions of external links to the article as ""removal of spam"". These external links, which had been part of the article since it's creation, are not spam, and were unjustifiably removed. One external link links to an article about the 150th anniversary of the oldest Roman Catholic Church in Staten Island, which is located in the neighborhood. Another external link links to a website created by a former resident who describes what it was like to grow up in the area before it was built up. It seems to me that this Philip Gronowski character, who has recently been resoundingly rejected in his candidacy for RfA, is not making legitimate revisions based on the rules of Wikipedia, but on his own interpretation of what is ""spam"". I'd like to request that this article be submitted for third party arbitration, and I have exhausted all attempts at a compromise with Mr. Gronowski. I will abide by any decision made by an impartial administrator concerning this dispute. Thank you very much for your consideration. "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11695147b1fab21f
|
"Yeah HIR isn't a blog at all - it's a collection of pieces on current events and history in a scholarly style with references. If we separate the links as Cmart says then everyone will know very well exactly what kind of link they are going to, so I think we should just add it and divide the links into pro-Israel and pro-Hezbollah. Talk
"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11696a5f8f80ff72
|
Al Wistert was inducted into the Eagles Honor Roll yesterday. I don't have all the details, but someone should write this in.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1169b6eed4b2157a
|
"
He's trying to intimidate and bait you because he's a racist who has no integrity. I imagine you can unpack the rest of his reasons if you think about it. You were innocent and tried to contribute to the overall project by attempting to refine the checkuser once you made your rightful case, but the entire incident stems from the malfeasance and hubris of corrupt admins in first place. Calling someone a sock with no evidence and indef blocking them is the easiest thing to do, then have a few friends ""review"" the block to ensure the silence lasts.
The exact same thing happened to me, but I was not so lucky. I'm the reason you got blocked, and I'm truly sorry for your troubles. I did nothing to warrant my blocking in the first place either, other than upset some xenophobes who are pushing their POV. A racist POV that they protect to the point where they will threaten you, like this user is doing, or even outright attack you. With users like this its not about ideals, morals or WP:principles, it's about power. Welcome to the dark world of realpolitik, be careful. 142.104.142.41 "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1169fe11e48cbdf9
|
Wow!!!! Instantaneous response. Obviously not spending an evening with the girlfriend .... bet you're free pretty much every Saturday night too, eh fellah?
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
116a79a87fe8a129
|
"
Unsurprisingly, trimming it down to only gaffes afforded their own page leaves very few. The article is much better served by discussing the topic and mentioning cases in context as they show up, rather than having a section that is based on what an editor may have an opinion is a particularly ""memorable"" one (especially since there are a few hundred gaffes reported every single month, as far as I can tell). (let's chat) "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
116ac30b7b12be8c
|
To answer the question, he nominated way too early in an attempt to get ITN credit for it. I removed because he added a new day to the page, which messes up the bot that automatically does it. As an ITN regular, Lihaas should've known not too. talk-contribs
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
116c1c91bd67c542
|
Preservation of Evidence
Would you mind copying the contents of [|this] page to your talk page? You can delete it immediately afterwards. I just need a diff preserving an accurate record of the evidence. Thanks. 76.107.171.90
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
116d66de06ccf4bb
|
"
I've changed the status of your case from ""Open"" to ""Under Investigation"" as I familiarize myself with the case... and as you probably know, this is a -very- involved case. I'm almost finished reading through all of the material and consulting with the other Advocates who were involved. Once that is finished, I'll be able to go over with you the pertinent points that I feel need to be addressed for my better understanding, and then go over what you wish to get out of Advocacy. I'll be in contact soon. אמר (/AMA) • "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
116def1b790362f8
|
no, i just randomly made up some pairs.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
116f63bc35640ae3
|
Username
Yes, it is a reference to a Dire Straits song, although it says that on my userpage.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
116ff813092530a1
|
"
And by nailing Philippa Gregory to the wall a 1000000 times!!! Feudalist "
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1170365c92860d71
|
California Clasico
For the actual topic, those two other rivalries do not belong there, go check out the sounders or timbers pages, does it mention anything about the Cali clasico? I do not understand why YOU feel the need to include it nor do I see any basis for the Atlantic Cup and the Cascadia rivalry to be included, on the San Jose Earthquakes page, if you fail to resolve this, then let this be an example of your refusal to comply and such manners shall be looked at by administrators.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11705e53c3a6e718
|
propfan MD-80
I read that during a period of unusually high fuel costs, MD built one -80 with propfan engines (these look like turbofans, but with a propellor attached to the rear; they are known for their effeicency). After some initial hype, no orders came, and the model (I believe it was a one-off, more of a demonstrator than anything else), was scrapped. There has been intermitent talk of using propfans on civil aircraft since then, but it has not come to anyhting.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1170a00cbcf587da
|
"
I think my ""discussion"" with V is winding down. (I had to look up Randroid). Thanks for the advice, chaos. speak! "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11712a3ded21b879
|
Joseph Cardinal Zen
I am already too neutral towards the son of bitch. He is a spy of the Holy See.
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
1171ee54999db38a
|
I already did so by taking a Wikibreak, as per step 2: Disengage For A While. I note with grim certainty that Striver and his POV-pushing colleagues have done no such thing.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
117355ef7868a3c5
|
ROHA, Stop floating from IP to the next and create an account. Thank you.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11753f4704359372
|
"
24.119.155.147 has vandalized my again.—.H "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11757a67a805a6cd
|
Policy Report
The community gave feedback on a couple of policy pages at WT:SOCK#Interview for Signpost and WT:CIVILITY#Policy Report for Signpost, and there will be another one in Monday's Signpost that we're putting together at WT:Username policy#Signpost Policy Report. I'm asking for your participation because you made an edit this month or last month at that talk page. If you have questions, feel free to ask at WT:CIVILITY#Policy Report for Signpost or my talk page. The best guide to what the community is expecting from the surveys is to follow the links above to see what they've already done; we haven't had any complaints. Thanks for your time. - Dank (push to talk)
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1176249ea6e8f40e
|
(UTC)
I think she transcribes the show and/or what callers are saying since Rush has a hearing problem, as you must well know.
Plus she probably searches the web for current news in certain categories. 05:24, 7 March 2010
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
117678e14aac1934
|
"
I'd maintain it was only a personal attack, the user I 'edit warred' with is clearly not going to last another hour given the amount of editors on his case now. I'm sorry - for you. talk to me "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
117692eb42260238
|
"
Come on and others so defensive of this article, how about working toward making it a real GA article? It will require a bit of an attitudinal shift for some, but I suggest removing most of the fanzine hearsay gossip about Barrett's behaviour when he was ill would be a good place to start. I would start doing it myself but the organised ""ring-in"" resistance I encountered last time deters me from bothering.
"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1177cb0a2b9442f1
|
"
(rather poor) Translation from German by Google
I searched Google for ""BfR rät vom Konsum der Kräutermischung"", the title of this link, and hit the Translate button. I invite you too do so also, and confirm that the word 'tobacco' is not to be found anywhere in the article. Near the end of the PDF is this statement: ""Information on potential risk can not presently be made"". Both statements about Spice and tobacco which this citation purports to verify will now be removed, and should not be restored other than in the unlikely event that citations for them can be found. Liars Busted. I will now look at the edit history to find who added this willfully erroneous information. "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11780d853ae5041b
|
ORLY? Fuck You Again n00b
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
117870272499b28a
|
Fixed. You know, you could of just fixed it yourself. I think it's a B-class, shall I upgrade it? #12 (samtal)
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11788729859a7594
|
File:Maine Senatorial Election Results by County, 2014.svg
I am using this image because it provides gradients for vote levels, and because it is easier on the eyes than File:08MESenateCounties.PNG. (t • c)
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11790ffaad08490f
|
Biographies
Hello Sparky331, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. To create a page about yourself, simply edit your own user page located at User:Sparky331. Please note that the main articles on Wikipedia are not meant for creating an autobiography about yourself or biographies about everyday people. For more information, refer to the following pages:
Wikipedia:Deletion of vanity articles
Wikipedia:Vanity guidelines
Wikipedia:Autobiography#Creating_an_article_about_yourself
Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Regards,, and I did a little of that for you,
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
117918150c44d423
|
"
Hilarious, Islander. You undo my evil, uncivil language (like it matters to anyone) but you leave the cowardly, bad-faithed and wrong accusations against me in place. Makes me feel real good about your judgement in indefblocking me. Sorta. Everyme "
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11797454ad12cc0c
|
"
I am gratified that you have truthfully explained your assumptions of bad faith. I dislike dishonesty more than most. I endeavor to keep The Big Boys honest, which includes you since you immigrated over here, so do not continue our disputes here. I could call you out for abusive blocks on The Little Boys place that are do not occur here, but I'm not a petty person. Drop the conspiracy theory, and move away from the dead horse.""Most of the dead were Congolese"" isn't a real sentence Seriously? "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1179a6c8c30b6f4e
|
"
Money in the Bank means you can go after any title, any time, any place. As Edge showed last year when (as a Raw wrestler) he appeared on Smackdown to beat the Undertaker for the World Title.
As Wiki's own article for MITB states, ""the briefcase holder...can appear on any of the 3 shows to allow the case holder the chance to cash in"".
WWE has plainly stated that the case holder can pick his own spot at his own time frame to cash in.
Having that case gives CM Punk the specific right to be on Raw whenever he chooses, so he is given the chance to cash in (if he wants to do so). That sets him apart from anybody else who pops up on Raw when it isn't his home brand.
May 14, 2008 18:30 (UTC)"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
117c93561b037a6e
|
"
Sociology
I hope I'm in the right place. I'm a newbie.
I've worked quite hard at editing the badly needed ""Sociology"" page, but am having trouble with using links. Please help.
Also, given the changes to content and context where I have clarified information and removed value ladden dialogue with whom do I discuss removing the:
""Clean up"" ""Editing"" and ""Tone"" warnings on the page? At present, it has been revamped, but the discipline is vast. I will add more as I progress and continue the edit as time permits. In the meantime, it would be nice for people to have a sense of confidence when reviewing the material now.Sociologist4life
Check out my edit of the ""Introduction to Sociology"" in wikiversity that I created, if that helps. At the time, I used Aresthusa as my handle.
Thanks!"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
117ce3a39840c1aa
|
I fully acknowledge that I made a mistake. My apologies.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
117d38965c2db784
|
edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
117f8ba520c516c1
|
"
Your edit to Green tea
Dear Focuset, may I advice you to read WP:EL, the links you are adding, and the way you are editing the pages are not neutral (I suspect the page belongs to yourself). Please read the pages, thanks! T C
Please stop adding commercial or personal-website links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. ... talk
Stop it
Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1180f0f1891e1dd8
|
Point taken. But Keeper, you are the one who originally admonished me for getting involved in issues that I was not directly connected to. Islander and I have our own history. It looks as though, had you not responded - I'd be listening to crickets here; as Islander is sticking to his normal communication pattern. So, in that - thanks. 72.92.4.157
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
118108e3aeda64b8
|
HiTrees Love Oxygen Like Cows Produce Methane
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
118148c9951a5547
|
Notability
You recently edited an article for Dekker Dreyer... the article is up for deletion based on notability, and I would like to ask you to chime in on the discussion of that deletion. Wikimegamaster
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11818b0276c7444a
|
It is you who are the TROLL FReepsbane. You could not win your arguments by logic so you resorted to framing me as wikzilla. Well now I am and you shall suffer.
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1181cced3b355518
|
Reverting
Do not revert an article more than three times in 24 hours. It is against wikipedia policies, see Wikipedia:Three-revert_rule
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1181ce6b2058eb9b
|
List of UFC bonus award recipients
Olá. Os ganhadores do Fight of the Night no Ufc 68 foram Jason Lambert vs. Renato Sobral, não Tim Sylvia vs. Randy Couture. Obrigado.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1182596a751d5f09
|
"
On the subject of the German Uranium, the obituary of Capt. Tibbets in the respected Guardian Newspaper (UK) included the following reference:
""At the end of the month, Little Boy arrived. It symbolised global war. Some of its uranium was from the Congo, confiscated from the Belgians in 1940 by the Germans and snatched from Soviet-occupied Germany in 1945 by an Anglo-American special unit.""
Is there any historical record to back this up?
The full obituary can be found at:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/military/story/0,,2204009,00.html
"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11827fcc16637a4b
|
not covered in the article
John Hughes was a notable cum guzzler - this is somewhat noteworthy right? The habit helped him in terms of idea generation and development for 16 Candles (referenced in Youtube Edition Mindfuck Doggystyle with Penry Rames.)
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1182864282650411
|
This whole page is messed up....charters listed on this page; when they were did not exist yet...or were created in 1988
There are a bunch of charters listed here on this page that were in the movie, but yet half of these charters listed were not ever created yet, this who page needs a big clean up.....
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11840aa4eb2a739a
|
"
Proposed Changes
1 USC 112 says that, ""The United States Statutes at Large shall be legal evidence of laws..."" but does not appear to address priority. (External link to Cornell's LII: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode01/usc_sec_01_00000112000-.html)
Should the last paragraph of the article be changed, or is there a resource that speaks directly to this issue?
"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1184b1172fac90db
|
Yes. See the talk page archives.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1184b1b00d8366f1
|
It seems you like playing some game that revolves around effing people who dare cross you (and getting their editing privileges suspended). You seem intent on driving potential editors away so you have the playground all to yourselftoo bad. I really could care less about the vacuous, anorexic piece of fake shi* known as Beckyknock yourself out. GFYourself!
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1184db68cbdcf1ed
|
"
Ping
""ping me when the case is finished
Hello, regarding Talk:Cold_fusion#New_article, I have seen your comment, and skimmed the article, but I can't really give it my attention now. When the case is finished, could you remind me of that article, so I can add to Martin Fleischmann and similar? Enric Naval (talk) ""
Please note the ""New Article"" piece of the CF talk page ""timed out"" and got archived."
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1184f3f81f605986
|
"
That's totally weird, because I didn't go anywhere near that line, not even a flyover with the mouse...there's been some other odd edits over time, too, with whole things blanked and I know I didn't do it; makes me wondering if there's a ""remora"" riding on my Wiki account sometimes...i.e. someone or some bot that rides along and does its own merry little games, no matter what -I- think I'm doing. I swear, all I did was re-spell ""crystallizing""....... "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11852341aba14c84
|
as an umbrella article for these plus treehouses and the like
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1186302c0dca91cb
|
Ooh deleted, I got told.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
118781cfbdf12338
|
This is my talk page for anyone who wishes to send a message. I appreciate them.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1187947a018a26f5
|
" December 2007 (UTC)
look, will u just do this, otherwise i'll ask someone else talk 05:16, 22"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1187bbe7234bcbd7
|
"
total contributions to date: 315; all of them pushing a Saint Sarah agenda. And '''' is ""Joe SPA""? Oy, such a sense of humor! - "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1188ce8f23d73684
|
"
I have removed the China section, if in the future someone comes up with several reliable sources that state that certain events that happened in China from whatever period was a genocide then it should be included on this page, but currently in my opinion there has not been enough scholarly sources presented to justify its inclusion. It is better to have no information about a subject in an encyclopaedia wrong information. ""I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons."" –Jimmy Wales (See WP:PROVEIT) "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1188cfdd09122e1f
|
It's also shown as different in the Welsh column. I can't find any evidence in either the originally cited source or in this one (Rhondda) for words spelt with our having a different vowel from the of FORCE. Nor can I find any evidence for words spelt with air having a different vowel from the of SQUARE, so the row with hair and their is also questionable.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
118a13fdf929b4ba
|
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. I don't care. I've tried to avoid writing this for days but now I must, I simply must write. This woman is sinful, and is on her way to the royal road to hell. Her wicked karma is piling up day by day. While she is on her deathbed, please go and ask her whether she is feeling happy. She seems to forget that one day every one has to die (including Wikipedia editors); it is only a matter of time, and death is not peaceful. And there is a possibility of going to hell (a subtle world for punishment based upon a person's bad karma. Sorry, Kim fans.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
118b208284bb9a2e
|
"
Census Wars
Could something be added to the rivalry section about the so called ""Census War"" that happend in the late 19th century? 71.34.12.212 "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
118c841c958b1937
|
"
Interestedinfairness/Mr.Neutral checkuser
Hi, can you clarify what you mean by ""Possible""? In the interest of AGF, the user (now indef blocked) seems convinced that a user with a grudge created that account and deliberately acted as his sock to get him banned. That'd obviously be a less reasonable claim if the IPs were from the same city block.
(Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Interestedinfairness/Archive)"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
118d1bb84330f2cf
|
"
Well, let's try again (one more time).
Re """"commonsenual"" = WP:OR. Regardless of sui generis it has all the characteristics of belligerent occupation (Glantz et al.)"" ""Commonsensual"" is not OR. Occupation sensu stricto is something quite concrete, and it is regulated by various international conventions. For instance, Guggenheim lists three different forms of occupation, and one of them refers to something quite unique. Therefore, we can speak about the ""occupation sensu stricto"" and ""occupation following an armistice"". That is what I mean under ""commonsensual"" occupation, and that is how a reader will understand it.
Re belligerent occupation, I do not deny the fact that some sources do describe it in this way; however, other sources (majority of sources) use different terminology. Therefore, the reference to one more source that uses the terminology you like does not change a picture much. I propose to present both viewpoints - you reject the very opportunity that a second viewpoint exists. Therefore, it is your arguments that do not hold water.
Re Malksoo, please, re-read his works again. And, since both you and I can draw different conclusions from different pieces of Malksoo's text, below is a quote from his own explanation of his own position, made specifically for us:
"" The Baltic Sattes were occupied in June 1940 and annexed (incorporated) by the USSR in August 1940. Thus, both occupation and annexation DID happen. The fact of annexation - and that the USSR proceeded with its policies from the presumption that these territories were its own, not occupied - changed the nature of the occupation, if not in terms of law than at least in terms of political realities. For example, when 1980 Moscow olympic games took place, the olympic regatta took place in Tallinn. This cannot be a typical occupation situation.However, it is important that the article would make clear that in the eyes of the predominant Western opinion and post-1991 restored Baltic States themselves, the Soviet annexation remained illegal. In this sense, illegal annexation equals extended occupation and the whole debate is a pseudo-debate. The annexation - since it remained illegal - did not create any extra rights to the annexing power, the USSR. If the article makes that aspect clear, I would be perfectly fine with the title of the article being changed to ""Occupation and Annexation of the Baltic States"". In fact, I would recommend such change because it takes more precisely (closer to the facts) into account the complex nature of the Soviet rule in the Baltic States.""
What else do you need? Malksoo clearly says that in the case of the Baltic states both occupation and annexation took place, and we can speak about continued occupation in this sense (but not in others. P.S.) llegal annexation equals extended occupation. In other words, we can speak about occupation in a context of the state continuity of the Baltic states, and I never argued against that. Again, what synthesis you accuse me in?
Re ""there is no bridge between the Baltic and Soviet/official Russian positions; there is no in-between or continuum of scholarship, it's one or the other;"" Wrong. There is a Baltic position, position of different foreign states (which was different from state to state and from time to time), positions of scholars (western, Baltic, Russian), Soviet positions (different during 1950s-70s and during Perestroika) and official Russian position.
Re ""From Glantz to Malksoo, a belligerent occupation."" Glantz is an authoritative expert in the military aspects of the WWII, not in the legal aspects; Malskoo does not consider Soviet intervention in 1940 as a military operation at all. The only aggressive step, according to him, was a naval blockade.
Re ""Baltic citizens became a lower class as their homelands were ""colonized"""" Probably. However, other sources tell that the real economic and political situation in these republics were much better than in other parts of the USSR, hence extensive influx of migrants. Was it possible if they had a colonial status?
I expect you to treat my arguments seriously. "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
118d31be4ac8a319
|
Vandalism and Semi-Protection
This article has been vandalized numerous times and I think it needs a lock on the article asap!!!
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
118dcf6f92efd12e
|
Maybe a line or two would cover it since Wikipedia isn't a Crystal Ball, it can't predict possible future events or expansions. NBC http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/15420361/ says that the probability of expansion are low citing lack of arenas and insufficient profits. This article is pretty interesting http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/ian_thomsen/02/13/international.expansion/index.html, however at this point it seems more like fantasy talk than any concrete plans. see also http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=2614550
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
118e208e1aef1d01
|
Robots.txt are the scourge of the internet. I should set up a crawler that ignores robots.txt files.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
118e2e7cd2b30188
|
Sex sex sex sex Sex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex sex sex sexSex
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
118ee46d69d1e00b
|
You would
you would too
You would
Dirty boy.
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
118eed5425196abe
|
Done. Suggest you publicise this proposal at WP:BIRD and other Tree of Life projects.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
118f1e840ceca919
|
Weak
That's all I gotta say.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
118f675b2ffa3bdc
|
"
, I'm now starting to get solid support at the AN/I. I thank all the editors doing so (including yourself), but I won't mention names so that my doing so does not get them in trouble. "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
118f8cb4b8ea60c5
|
Batman timeline
There already is a Timeline of the DC Universe, just fyi.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1190183c4aacbaf2
|
No, if It's unofficial then you should be fine.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1190ddc487465bd2
|
Except that you would never dare say something in New Haven was in Neil's Harbour to anyone in the area. The two are very big rivals and historically have had issues with each other. That would be like saying Dartmouth and Halifax were the same city prior to the merge. Or Minneapolis and St. Paul are the same city. Those would also be big nonos. -
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
119142fc5b552f1a
|
Get over it, move on and let it go it's not difficult. Once you've done that leave me alone and don't talk to me again please. I called your sock puppet friend a littke Hitler not a Nazi and that wasn't even aimed at you so don't know why you're in such a state about it.
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1191e7540d6f2801
|
I would consider it informing oyu on policies and responding to your snide remarks not nagging you.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1191ff74ce7b5a65
|
"
In the long term, yes. However, at the moment my main concern is the complete lack, or sparsity of, information concering ship classes. I'd like to make sure there's no redlinks for any ""modern"" ship classes, certainly not for anything major since World War 2. I'd also like there to make sure that what information is out there is presented in a straightforward, accurate and common style. It's a huge task, but something I feel I would best serve wikipedia doing. So, back to the point, right now it is my feeling that an article on naval estimates is just adding to the work to be done, but it's definitely something to put on a ""to do"" list. (Really should set up a project, but haven't the knowledge of how to do so at the moment) Talk "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1192e988df60512f
|
2013 (UTC)
Check out this new publication! Perspectives on Open and Distance Learning: Open Educational Resources: Innovation, Research and Practice - bound to be lots of good stuff here. - 00:14, 4 May
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
119383600c860c37
|
Money spinner? You bet!
The head of the olympics delivery authority pays himself a million a year, so at least somebody is coming out on top.88.110.112.185
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1193880b7762abdd
|
"
Joint Command
Since this is a joint command, I wonder whether it is appropriate to speak of Navy"", etc. forces. I think we should be calling these Naval, military, airborne''' (or somesuch). Specific assignments of services doesn't seem appropriate for joint commands, IMO. "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
119399eb6301e601
|
That was nice and civil wasn't it?
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11953aee38812bbf
|
"
Consider whether the details about the visual identity are relevant in an encyclopedic article about the museum in general. If you think they are too specific, you can also consider adding parts of it to the articles of the designers instead.
The articles should be sourced differently, this article is not published by the Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam, so the reference should look something like this:
Katie Treggiden, ""Wim crouwel in conversation"", Confessions of a design geek, 2011. Retrieved on 2013-09-29.
And finally, note that Wikipedia is a work in progress, so your paragraph doesn't need to be perfect before it can be added to the article. Succes with your project. – "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
119743ae10b3287a
|
It should be noted that traditioning in most martial arts including Muay Thai(which mostly is not a martial art anymore due to the adoption of instinctive fighting techniques of the upper body(boxing as it is called)and many other martial art techniques not exclusive to Maui Boran or Maui Tha, etc...) women are not considered true martial artists anyway. That is because the arts are designed, used, mastered, and needed by men and its techniques are supposed to play to the strengths of a man. A woman's training dating back centuries was an emphasis on wounding the target with a basic attack and running. This is one of the many reasons escorts where provided. It is sad what has happened to Karate and TKD in the modern schools on average in the emphasis on sport and money from children practioners(by way of parent(s), unconditioned elders, and women. But that is another debate. Regardless, female fighters are not to show any signs of claiming equality to a male fighter since the potential is clearly lacking. Like it or not, gender is of the physical, mental, and in my opinion the spiritual as well. Play to its strengths, not its weaknesses. It is the opposite sex that helps you compensate for your weaknesses due to your gender.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1197624f0bd95c12
|
Welcome!
Hello, Ammypanwar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11984abd4fd638a1
|
"Saint-Gaudens typically signed his own work (in bronze no less) with a hyphen: his portrait of Jules Bastien-Lepage (1880) for example, or his portrait of William Picknell (1877), his portrait of his son, Homer Saint-Gaudens (1882), his portrait of Charles Beaman (1894), or his Washington Medal, (1889) inscribed ""copyrighted by Augustus Saint-Gaudens"". There were exceptions, of course, when he dropped the hyphen, usually when signing with a monogram: his medal of the artist John S. Sargent (1880) is signed ""FECE A ST G"".
"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11987aac0a8708a6
|
Used 203.189.83.87 deserves another block
You blocked this user a week ago for a week and he's back ... the acc't is clearly only used for vandalism (although of a very minor sort)
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
119889469c0421c1
|
"
(1) Please remain civil. You may have a personal relationship with the subject, or have personal reasons for supporting him, but taking personal offence on his behalf isn't useful to improvement of the article. (2) You keep conflating my changes with those of someone else. The use of the word ""caused"" appears to be the major source of your dudgeon, and I didn't make that change. You keep reverting all changes wholesale including changes made for reasons purely of style rather than picking out the ones which are bothering you. (3) We have no proof that the documents are ""sensitive"" or that Bradley Manning is responsible for anything at all, since there has been no legal action. You complain about BLP, but accepting claims about Bradley Manning's guilt in the matter of a serious criminal offence are an extremely serious BLP policy violation. Until the claims of Lamo and the US government have been established in a court of law, we CANNOT use the word-of-God to state their claims are true. As for the torture citation, if you read the article (and many others also easily obtainable), you will see that it's the newspaper which chose to put ""torture"" in quotation marks, not the experts they consulted. We are not interested in the editorial opinion of the newspaper, but rather the opinion of the experts whom the newspaper has consulted who clearly states that Manning's treatment amounts to torture. "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1198ac98372e9f27
|
"
http://twitter.com/#!/CungLe185/media/slideshow?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitpic.com%2F6fmuth Directly from his website. It would not make sense to represent the USA if he was not a citizen of the USA?
""I talked to a coworker"" is not a reliable source. I'm not sure how Twitter counts, but I'd assume that if he has his own personal Twitter account that counts as a primary source. Barring a reliable secondary source on what citizenship he has, primary sources trump ""I talked to a coworker"", I believe. - One ping only
He just tweeted this -http://scribe.twitter.com/#!/cungle185 @Luv4theGame I am a US citizen. Who cares what they say! They have nothing better to do with their time. Bushranger, I believe it is within my rights to use this information and finally close this issue because Cung Le has specifically stated that he is a U.S. citizen. I will now go and revert his pages, if you think I am violating Wikipedia rules. Please let me know, and I will stop. Again, I am trying to handle this as civil as possible. His twitter account is verified, and is listed on Facebook page, CungLe.com, and on the OFFICIAL UFC.com page. This is the UFC.com page, his tweets are clearly shown as well http://www.ufc.com/fighter/Cung-Le "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
119906c700f132ac
|
I doubt this will get through your thick head (it's not an insult, it's an opinion based on your response) but the problem is not the issue itself. It's that people like you seem to enjoy (whether or not your side gets it right) to discuss, turn, twist and frankly abuse topics like this which are detrimental to the basic goals of Wikis in general and Wikipedia in particular. As John Stewart said to two hacks; You're hurting us.
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1199c0ed5a1615f5
|
I have read the user page policy and see nothing written against the statement of political, religious, or ideological beliefs and I'd love it if you could point it out to me. I resent a lot of the template deletions going on including several by you. What's wrong with expressing my opinions so long as they aren't condescending? Some of the derogotory templates (such as the Commie Bastard template and others that are meant to insult and degrade) I support the deletion of. But the other such as the ones on religious beliefs, political beliefs and others I strongly oppose the deletion of. And, Kelly, you are being very selective (as was pointed out above) for reasons I have yet to understand. Many of your template deletions and those of a few others seem VERY POV to me. - my dropsonde - archive
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1199e75d476a872c
|
I've not got a Mac.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
119af7a37abf9c72
|
I don't see how that fits into the article, but if you have a proposal you can add it here, or add it to the article.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
119b6c656cc75f76
|
"
I understand your point. I simply do not believe it to be valid. During the period in question, the RC Church did not have large armies at its disposal. It relied on secular powers to take heed of its views. In France, Louis, a loyal Catholic hated the concept of religious toleration. The RC Church, at this time, were also opposed to this principle (one that has become so widely accepted in 'western' societies that it is often difficult to imagine a time before). Louis, with the tactic support of leading Churchman, ordered acts of anti-Protestant terror. (Let's be completely honest, without the tactic approval of the Church, would a devout Catholic have been committed to such a course of action?) Some leading Churchman celebrated the outcome - a France almost completely 'cleansed' of Protestants. Now, in all the material the criticism of the RC Church is so obviously implied that this shouldn't need re-emphasising. A modern historian would not write: ""The following is a criticism of the RC Church..."" That is how junior school children begin their English composition answers! "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
119b779f86b43e99
|
I know this is not scientific data because I don't have the documents but my high school Geography teacher told me some years ago that the 238.391 sq km is the correct figure because in the comunist period there were people reporting smaller figures in order to pay smaller taxes. So I think Bogdandiusca is right. Either taxes or agricultural reports (or bouth).
Paul I
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.