Datasets:
tasksource
/
jigsaw_toxicity

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
1
id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
1005275316eac9c2
(UTC) She is by definition, a terrorist. So, yes on that one. 23:25, 1 June 2009
0
0
0
0
0
0
100650eab8030571
Re:Miley Cyrus' death Ah, we meet again! I've added a 3RR report for this user, as it's been 4 reverts so far. It's not just him/her, though, and not just here. I can't find anything about this being true, though.
0
0
0
0
0
0
100666285e9a18e0
That works too. ;)
0
0
0
0
0
0
1006c2594423ee54
Re: User Talk: 75.33.29.54 I recall blocking that user but, due to the length of time is has been since I blocked the page and the fact that the page is no longer existent, I do not recall my reason at this time. If you could somehow tell me what was on that page, as honest as possible, maybe I can remember my reason for blocking that page. Thanks!
0
0
0
0
0
0
1006fea711347e1c
Changing the title of the article As we all know the name of Age Of Conan: Hyborian Adventures has been changed to Age Of Conan Unchained, so I think the title of the article about the game of the articles should be changed. I would like to invite all the people who have edited this article to give their opinions on this matter please.
0
0
0
0
0
0
100764a2b6dff2cb
" What a pile of shit. You completely ignore a massive violation of WB:BLPCRIME while you go on holiday. You, Wales, are one special piece of shit. Magnotta's prospective defence team are having wet dreams about wikipedia. There can be no fair trial given the article you have approved.You are a fucking idiot. When politicians come calling at your door complaining at {{WP:BLP]], you collapse like a wet kleenex in a mild breeze. You should be ashamed of yourself. But perhaps it is more important to you that people like Malleus are pursued for calling cunts ""cunts"". If you allow this massive violation of WP:BLPCRIME to pass, then you are patently a media-whoring cunt yourself. This stinks, Wales. You stink, by association. Fuck you and your warped concept of an ""encyclopedia"". Chan "
1
0
1
0
0
0
100a2ef8c9ed06d9
" Source suggested I'd suggest that someone who is working on this article should read and probably cite some material from Christopher Hayes, ""MoveOn At Ten"", The Nation, August 4/11, 2008, p. 11–18. Online version dated July 16, 2008. A rather rounded discussion of MoveOn from a left/liberal point of view, including both criticism and praise. In particular, has some criticism from people who are to MoveOn's left, something that is missing from the article as it stands. Among others, it quotes John Stauber to the effect that MoveOn has become ""primarily a money-raising and marketing arm of the Pelosi wing of the Democratic Party."" It also gives what seems like a pretty balanced account of the group's origins, and of both what has remained constant about the organization and what has changed. - | Talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
100a7d288fa6d28e
I don't see what you mean. All I can find on that page are a few comments saying they disagree, but no reasons or arguments, so that doesn't mean anything.
0
0
0
0
0
0
100cb1df0306a6c1
"Then maybe there should be two Veganism articles and a disambiguation page. One would cover Veganism the philosophy of avoidance of all animal products, food or otherwise, and the other would cover the diet of ""strict vegetarians"" who still buy leather, wool and animal byproducts. The confusion is including all the dietary definition confusion with the philosophy stance. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
100ccaeb21169714
The same goes for Ibn.
0
0
0
0
0
0
100cd3270688da92
In fact, upon review of your contribution, I made changes to bring it in line with the manual of style. —' (talk) Greetings!Welcome!Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —' (talk)
0
0
0
0
0
0
100ce4376d1d51e9
" No, we don't. The name ""Ivory Coast"" contains only English-alphabet letters, and it would sort just fine in almost all cases where ""Côte d'Ivoire"" remains missorted, often appearing after Croatia, after Cyprus, after Czech Republic. You can see this by looking at Category:Communications by country and seeing where the subcategory Category:Communications in Côte d'Ivoire is missorted (even though the sorting of the article of the same name has been fixed—can you see the difference in order?). Or you can see it by looking at Category:Nations at the 2004 Summer Olympics and seeing where the article Côte d'Ivoire at the 2004 Summer Olympics is missorted. There are hundreds of those problems out there. Why don't you make yourself useful, and go fix some of them? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
100d71b4d52c49bd
Category:Former Yahoo! employees :Category:Former Yahoo! employees, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.
0
0
0
0
0
0
100dfea42831ae74
RBI MY BUM LOL IM NOT STOPING
0
0
0
0
0
0
100e01251c669359
" Ah, I'm sorry. Then who is the ""consensus declarer""? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
100e1a98e75fe6af
REDIRECT Talk:Namaqua rain frog
0
0
0
0
0
0
100e1f9d4773601c
BLP Clarification On your Deletion Review vote on Jim Shapiro, you mentioned that you thought WP:BLP be clarified. I'm curious as to what you mean by that. I agree with your vote on this deleted article. How could the BLP be better clarified? Thanks.
0
0
0
0
0
0
100f1945c3c76aef
" 2010 (UTC) An interesting comment: ""Convict leasing isn't the same as slavery where there's ownership and title. However, I would agree that we could amend the lead to read: ""effectively abolished slavery..."" True there is a difference with chattel slavery and forced prison slave labour. One ended w/ the 13th amendment, and the other was legalised under the 13th amendment (not the Corwin Amendment of 1861). In other words, what would be the legal justification for the prison labour in California, Oregon and other states that practise this form of human rights abuse without the ""involuntary servitude"" clause? WWhat do you think they were referring to? Futhermore, I don't see a problem including this in the article, so long as it is a small reference, and not the focus of the article. As to scholarship, there is reputable work on this, and there is no doubt that starting in 1866 the prison chain gangs were leased to private business, plantations, mines etc for being picked up for the most frivilous charges. Yes they were mostly black. The mortality rate was higher than chattel slavery because they were leased and not owned. Virtual life sentences on absurd charges directed against black people w/ forced labour is slavery, though not chattel. This was systematic and went on until WW2, though today's version is slightly different. Now, some of you asked for refrences and rightly so. Slavery by Another Name by Douglas Blackmon, who is a respected writer & journalist and received the Pulitzer Prize for this book which is on this very topic. That's the point. This is FAR from original research, and there are other scholars who've written about it. Now I haven't edited the article nor will I unless there is some agreement w/ others editors here, but I'd like to know the issue as it is now. How do other editors feel? One other thing, American historians do not always agree on things, and I have noticed at least one conspicious neo-Confederate argument in the article (unsourced), though on a different part of the article. So yes it's important to look at historians, but on some topics there's a whole lot of rubbish, particularly w/ slavery issues, so a consensus by historians may never happen, and sadly ideological agendas do exist, and I understand what you blokes mean about good sources. I'd say that keeping this article from vandalism is far more important. 15:00, 18 July"
0
0
0
0
0
0
101021b088c1d49a
" The use of the word ""goal"" was merely an approximation I hoped would help the explanation. It's not currently used in the article. To explain this a different way: if you construct a scale with anything but a geometric sequence (e.g. an arithmetic sequence) the steps would not be perceived to be the same. If the perception of intervals was arithmetic instead of geometric, our equal tempered scales would be arithmetic sequences instead. - "
0
0
0
0
0
0
10103f3de39885f3
False accusation of off-Wiki Harassment You've crossed a line by making an absolutely baseless, unfounded and patently false accusation. I expect a retraction and demand an apology. I have never called any Wiki editor. The editor who claimed to have received harassing telephone calls should take the matter up with appropriate law enforcement authorities. I'm sure they will deal with them appropriately. But, they weren't from me.
0
0
0
0
0
0
10106d32c3ba3144
Since I'm new to this, I am a bit unsure as to how to edit things so I simply will leave a message and info this way. I am a school counselor and psychologist in California. First of all, while it is true indeed that California only requires school counselors to have a bachelor's degree as far as degrees go, we are subject to practicum hours (in a graduate program) and must meet criteria in order to obtain the required Pupil Personnel Services credential in School Counseling so that we can work in the schools.
0
0
0
0
0
0
101164f4db24ce40
" Hey, sorry to bug you again, but I have a question. You said that this image would not be usable since the copyright holder was unknown. I found it listed at a separate sight listed as ""Photographer: Joseph Cultice"". Would it be acceptable to use the picture from the No Doubt site and credit it as such (especially since this one isn't being sold)? — "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1012360b034aa889
Centrifugal Force Acroterion, recently you took an interest in the centrifugal force page. I would be most grateful if you could look at the recent deletion of my edit on the main page of that article. If you check it out, you will find that Wolfkeeper has a long record of deleting things which I put on the main article. When I put that edit on yesterday, I was fully expecting Wolfkeeper to delete it. But I was very careful to make sure that the edit contained only basic textbook material and that there could be no possible grounds to justify him deleting it. You will recall that my block last week was because I was accused of incivility by having accused Wolfkeeper of wikistalking for having deleted stuff that had put on the main page. Interestingly, Wolfkeeper has attempted to justify his actions this time. His first reason was pathetic. It was something to do with the section being out of place. The second reason merely exposes Wolfkeeper's total lack of knowledge about the topic in question. The marble experiences a side on Coriolis force as it rolls out to the edge of the turntable. Interestingly, PhySusie who I presume was attempting to back up Wolfkeeper has then come in and stated this very fact as if it were me that didn't know it. If you are genuinely interested in justice on wikipedia and proving that there is no corruption, I would be most grateful if you could monitor the ensuing debate very carefully. I know that you say that you are not trained in this topic but it is all very basic stuff and I am sure that you will be more than capable of seeing exacly what is going on.
0
0
0
0
0
0
10123b25c9193cd7
" Rewired I see you have updated the security system. Nice. Is it a McAfee 2000?. Just dropped by to relate a little story I uncovered as I wandered here and there... There once was a little boy named Johnny who had a wonderful dog named Laddie. Johnny was prone to emotional outbursts, and his mother was concerned by his overreactions. One day while Johnny was at school, Laddie was killed in an unfortunate accident. The mother took Laddie's body and put it in the backyard. She was very worried how Johnny would react to the news of his dog's death. When Johnny returned from school, his mother said to him, ""I'm really sorry, Johnny, but Laddie died in an accident."" Johnny responded ""Okay"" and went upstairs to change his clothers. The mother was quite surprised at the calm reaction. After Johnny put on his play clothes, he went out to the backyard. All of a sudden, the mother heard Johnny screaming. She rushed out to the backyard and saw Johnny prostrate over the dog's body and wailing. The mother said, ""But, Johnny, I told you Laddie died."" In between sobs, Johnny sputtered, ""I thought you said Daddy."" ``` Talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
101359aaef3ffb2c
I wrote this page and am happy for it to be merged/deleted in the interests of excluding redundant information. Cheers!
0
0
0
0
0
0
1013a758049a4f23
Im having problems with vandalisim
0
0
0
0
0
0
1014facb7fe6ab1c
" A barnstar for you! The Real Life Barnstar hey buddy thanks for what you do here, but what do you know about chillout music and this artist? this guy is world famous in chillout music and deserves a page on wiki ,you have to give me a reason of why you want this page to be deleted ? this guy has 2 tracks on buddha bar series and has more than 50 releases you want to delete this page go ahead but with people like you wikipedia will never expand! "
0
0
0
0
0
0
10162b41ef99c6cd
Is that General 9 ............ Is that General Order 9 illustation of a UFO still around ? I've seen it in two places, one in a USMC Boot Manual, the other, online. I was told that this was intended as a example of the USMC protocol to handle unforseen situations, thus the UFO pixes.
0
0
0
0
0
0
10164a0b15760ccd
Not to mention God, the supernatural, and what happened before the Big Bang. If it can't be measured, science doesn't try to explain it.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1016e47120702fd8
It was about content There is a lot of content in those photos and I give a heads-up about the commercial nature of the site for those who might feel that they will not be able to resist the offer for sale of the images. Those images have a lot of content in them and you are being a hair-splitter by ripping them out just because copies of them are for sale. To do shun all art museums that have a shop atteached to them? Get a life: I am putting that link back.
0
0
0
0
0
0
10184aa4834f5c6a
It does belong but not in this form. Let the debate first decide whether or not it's good in this shape.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1019adbacd17601e
User:Sakimonk Although . 68.100.166.227
0
0
0
0
0
0
101a5250c60fc196
" The 93,173 number is listed as ""reported"". This means that there is a dispute over the accuracy of that number. You still don't own any articles (and neither do your sockpuppets), and you are still a classic Wikibully. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
101bbd6adb6a04d3
Crystal Ball I've removed the deletion ntoice becaue the article is not crystal balling- it doesn't try to predict anything but talks about a real proposition that is being discussed.
0
0
0
0
0
0
101ec780bbb89e5d
" It was added to the article about a year ago, and has stayed there ever since. Due to the information that it isn't true I've removed that section. talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
101ec7bb9f689da1
It seems to me that this posited range-block is not going to work - if we look at users (with non-blank user pages) beginning with 70.105 there are only 6, one is already a suspected sock of PW and several are manifestly not PW-clones. So can you just please block the IPs + WestfieldIns which I brought to your attention (quite a few edits ago) and put a stop to the incessant quacking? (I did have a look at range-blocking. I can see why you view it with some circumspection.)
0
0
0
0
0
0
101ed85a0a74736d
Page is Radical to the point of Deletion This article needs major cleanup. It is hard to read, and hard to understand. It is not neutral at all. We need cleanup. )
0
0
0
0
0
0
101efbf666727e0b
(guess why I do not bother to take a nickname here:Wikipedia is degenerating and succumbing to politically correct partisanism at an alarming pace).
0
0
0
0
0
0
101f89c4301e8d7f
Rename article This article should be called 2014 Ukraine crisis, the Crimea is part of Ukraine and the full scope of the issue is Ukraine, the Crimea is just one aspect of the full crisis. Thanks
0
0
0
0
0
0
10214ffbdfba4eb9
Rv edits by ZORDANLIGHTER and Whistlingwoods socks of user Vvarkey
0
0
0
0
0
0
1021897b1a9fc49e
Where? Here? Or here? Where is it? You are not linking me to it. And you have absolutely no basis for suspecting a COI, get a hold of yourself. -
0
0
0
0
0
0
1021bef29d42c3a6
I'm not an admin, so I won't be the one making a decision about your unblock request, but it appears that what you state in your unblock request isn't true. Here's the chronology: You recieve the warning about your improper use of reviewing templates on AFC submissions: You blank the warning: You then continue to improperly template the AFC submissions: , , . You were then blocked. Therefore, it appears that you did not cease your involvement with AFC following your warning.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1022ffddd9563118
I have changed Lou's block duration to indefinite due to his total lack of productive edits. He's done nothing but disrupt this article. —aco
0
0
0
0
0
0
1023e8697ee2f883
Using your knowledge as a reference... Noel, you are an expert. Please convince Whig history fans (or the lazy minds) about how Bonnie Prince Charlie did not want to dissolve the Union, that the United Kingdom began with the Stuarts as opposed to the Hanoverians. Tell them how the Whigs rewrote history to blame everything on the Stuarts, whom are credited as ultimate failures with no positive contributions to the foundations of Great Britain in their Stewart and Tudor blood. The Sovereign's will is the Realm, or else it is not a kingdom. The British might as well be living in a republic, at least if the Parliamentarians had their way. Even the Hanoverian heirs recognise that the Stuarts founded the UK. Please debate that here & thanks.
0
0
0
0
0
0
10240f5766373839
Dear Yono, You don't need to apologize for anything, and you can edit any number of times you like. I just want to know if there are any serious problems with that article, such as copyright violation. If there are none, never mind then. -) Goodnight, and happy editing whenever you wake up. ;-) 04:53, 2004 Aug 30 (UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
102427a7aaff9956
(after ec). So according to the source she had English speaking interrogators in the first interrogation and kept only for a short time without an official interpreter in the second interrogation where she then became a suspect. What sources are denying this account?
0
0
0
0
0
0
1024569a7d7fbbb5
That is somewhat difficult, since Nietzsche didn't make any such summary, and the question of which were his main concepts is one of the lasting controversies. PMAnderson
0
0
0
0
0
0
10249a5e6cf426e1
You can edit your own article, under any account. Sock puppetry is deceptively using multiple accounts to influence content. Have you seen instances of that? If you've got a problem with the content of this article, address the content. Take your attempts to malign the subject somewhere else.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1025324f53e97a6e
REDIRECT Talk:Filibuster in the United States Senate
0
0
0
0
0
0
102664aa6919dfb4
op is a fag op is a fag
1
0
1
0
0
0
10268e08244f4ff7
" Thank you, but please tell ""Some guy"" that my message to him was not a personal attack, as I noted above. I would do this myself but I can only post on my own talk page given I'm blocked. Please also explain why you believe I lied about anything. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
10269542c254a905
Wow, that's amazing. I log on for the first time in months, edit an article and a predatory editor has me blocked indefinitely without an opportunity to respond. Don't even get a chance to look at whatever evidence may have been fielded against me? Why have I been associated with the various other IP addresses? Really: what the heck?
0
0
0
0
0
0
10274e47ca58392e
Rao Jazib Saeed Rao Jazib Saeed is a business graduate from NUML Islamabad native of Multan Pakistan.
0
0
0
0
0
0
10281df6216455b8
Jet Streamer Jet Streamer is a son of a bitch, don't listen to him, he can go to hell
1
0
1
0
1
0
10287ae7c4dc4ebe
" My god how childish are you! You mean the other source (Encyclopedia Brittanica) which also states i quote ""Mentally the negro is inferior to the white... the arrest or even deterioration of mental development [after adolescence] is no doubt very largely due to the fact that after puberty sexual matters take the first place in the negro's life and thoughts."" Yeah really reliable. Instead of contacting the other sites to tell them their right why don't you learn some history, like when the union was formed since you don't even know that and then, if your brain can cope, try learning the differance between ENGLISH and BRITISH. Though i must say i'm not surprised you don't know any of this being a foreigner. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
10293437c5ca3b12
Dude you crazy! Dude, you are totally not cool. Why did you leave me that message on Resume? I totally fixed it. I don't know what's up you gluteus maximus. Dog, you need to cool off your jets in a salon. Get a pedicure and don't be so upset when a brotha is just trying to have a good time. If you want to go on a date with me just leave me your number on my user talk page. Peace
1
0
1
0
0
0
102aaffe9e01bbaa
Quick question for you, Joy! How do I insert and/or format an article to have & use a table of contents? Thanks,
0
0
0
0
0
0
102b5da6122e680e
Way I see it, people who say the Sherman is a very good tank, are seriously overestimating it. I mean come on, it was nicknamed Ronson for a reason you know. Any tank that has to maneuvre around at close range to the sides and rear of an opposing tank to score a kill is definitely not good. The only notable good Sherman at the end of the war is the VC Firefly, but because US Ordinance doubted the 17 pounder could be fitted onto the tank, it was manufactured in limited quantities. The only notable features of the Sherman was that it was produced in large quantities, had a mechanical reliability that beat the T-34, and came with better secondary equipment such as FM Radio and an elevation gyro-stabiliser. Not to mention the extremely sad stories behind it. Once, a Sherman maneuvered around a building to hide from a Tiger tank. The Tiger shot at the building, and the shell went right through and penetrated the Sherman's turret. There are also tales of German tanks who take out two aligned Shermans in one shot. Also, do you know why you see all these wartime photos of crewmen who have Shermans with spare road wheels and tracks welded onto the hull? Those are efforts to help augment the armour of the Sherman.
0
0
0
0
0
0
102d2233cbd33215
Street Fighter X Tekken Review - Character List cannot be removed. In your review for Street Fighter X Tekken, you said that the character list has to be removed. This cannot be done because it would be inconsistant with all the other fighting game articles we have here, the majority of which have character lists. 85.210.178.116
0
0
0
0
0
0
102dd721fd0efc54
south park butters butters is a main character according to these links, thank you: [] [] [] read paragraphs 2,3, 5, 6,8 []
0
0
0
0
0
0
102de97142d7e745
== Brother of Mike Jones (rapper)? I remember reading something that said Mike Jones in related to Howard Jones as siblings and that Howard appears as a guest on one of his albums. Can anyone verify this? 69.250.142.218
0
0
0
0
0
0
102e5e58686010f5
Aftermath: Korean news coverage (legit or not?) This is currently discussed by various online media and online forums, it's hard to say if it's legit or just another prank - please see: http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/bulletin/2013/07/07/0200000000AKR20130707005953092.HTML http://www.koreabang.com/2013/stories/korea-responds-to-asiana-airlines-crash.html (Also the the reader's English comments at the end of the article)
0
0
0
0
0
0
102ed2b9a979bd4f
" Cathleen Falsani There's a bit overuse of the phrase ""to critical acclaim"", but otherwise it doesn't seem too 'advertisy' to me and it's all right, even preferred, to name an author's awards. Can you be a bit more specific about what you think doesn't belong in the text? - |(talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
10304d5db5fb5821
n i g g e r f a g g o t
1
1
0
0
0
1
10309c57a2920ead
" Sodom Yat Thank you for trying to be helpful in resolving this. I have followed your advice. Talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
103103a806c88900
Please do not add hoaxes to Wikipedia. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please don't disrupt Wikipedia in an attempt to test our ability to detect and remove such material. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thank you. —What I Do / What I Say
0
0
0
0
0
0
1031775edfab995e
Oh so you find it funny that you're friends with a sicko who grooms young boys on wikipedia? Why do you protect those who use wikipedia as a tool to fufill sick pedophile urges? Do you like to touch up young boys too? It wouldn't suprise me.
1
0
0
0
0
0
1032dea095c1cdf4
Traditional Easter games I didn't realise you'd created that article until I saw it on the DYK page today you sneaky devil! That was a productive and fun collobaration all round, thanks and congratulations.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1032f0fbf67485b1
Your One Of The Person's Who Deleted My Page I'm Mad At You.You Dissapoint Me.Everyone is deleting And I'm Gonna Write A Note To The Wikipedia Company.O.K Do You Get That Strait!.( )
0
0
0
0
0
0
1034ac91f7bc3760
Thanks ! I think we are really both saying about the same thing, perhaps with me putting a bit much more emphasis on individual ingredients than you. I certainly agree that processed food should be avoided, whenever possible.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1035aef3b46f242b
"can i suggest something like ""The scientific consensus is that anthropogenic global warming is occurring, however there is continual scientific study t better undersand the matter. political and public debate continues."" i think it would be helpful if you were all a little more accomodating. and africangenesis usually if you provide good references no one argues. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
10368fe0ce890e1d
" I concur. But, the nagging thing for me right now is that some anon IP and registered users (probably the same person but who is to know, right?) keeps posting rubbish on my talk page as well as stalking/trolling my edits. Bugs, all of a sudden it reminds me of that horsegnat guy we put away a few years back... can we really say that it is a case closed then? ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® "
0
0
0
0
0
0
103848d057e454bc
" OK, Obi-wan. You're starting to make me suspicious. What do you always ask exactly what I think are the right questions? Own up. Either way, you did not answer my question directly, and I also suspect you know it. ""Does this mean that WPO is not useful to you?"" But you did answer it indirectly. So you get an even more direct question in return: Why make it obvious that you know a lot about Wikipedia, without telling us that you find it useful when you are a very direct person otherwise? For one, you are calling them out on the most inconvenient of all questions for them. If you don't mind, I'm going to take this straight to the source: WPO peeps, what the dealio? I've asked people on WP to put up or shut up. I've asked the WMF to walk their talk. In fact, I've staked my rep several times now, and I'm not done yet. Now I'm asking you, why don't you stop whining for once and show people you can actually do better? On-wiki or off-, Obi-wan certainly isn't the first to question your self-righteous assertions on how to build an online encyclopedia better than Wikipedia. I, for one, have been wondering for a while now. So, let's see what you can do besides making snarky, personal comments. Here's a pot, and here's a kettle. Need I mention what color they are? Onwards with Obi-wan's points. I don't believe in nasty people. Deciding anyone is bad, nasty, etc. has only one purpose; one can feel better about being bad, nasty, etc. to people they've so judged. I don't think this is particularly productive. In fact, IMO it is unbelievably destructive once someone decides- or, more often, others have convinced them- that they themselves are bad people. We could talk about this more in another thread, but we've got to get back on topic here, so. . . You know that the Wikipediocrats are smart. You have spent more time there than you're willing to admit directly. I immediately wonder if it's just in reading or in writing, too. ) They are indeed among the smartest in the WP community reasoning-wise that I've met so far. But emotionally. . . less than average. How do you think many of these smart m'er f'ers ended up getting indef blocked or banned? A lot of them fell from grace, not because they weren't an asset to the community, but because they didn't seem to know when- or they were completely unwilling- to stop fighting for what they saw as justice. That's one part of the answer; many of them are banned or blocked- whether rightly so or not- from editing on Wikipedia. Also, it's normal for someone who has been banished to tell themselves they wish harm on their homeland, while still keeping a great emotional investment in it. You'll hear the same people spout their disdain for Wikipedia almost in the same breath as suggestion to improve it. Frankly, we could speculate about these people's motives and methods til the sun goes down. Let's be more practical about what is best for Wikipedia here. What we, as a Wikipedia community, can't do is ignore them away. And, even if we could, we're doing a piss-poor job of it, because I almost always hear about what's been said on Wikipediocracy from a Wikipedian before I go to the actual site. Ultimately, I go back to my old standard: I don't give a shit where these people come from or what their motives are; all's I know is that they are saying something interesting, and I appreciate the fact that I don't have to gloss over a bunch of posts that are trying to get them to shut up as I read it. Obi-wan, no use playing coy. You know exactly what I'm talking about. D "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1039aff23eb525d3
I was not blocked for calling someone a Nazi. I was blocked for calling a Loud Mouth Insensitive Twit, Ping Pong, when he interjected in a situation that was not his business. He did not like being told to mind his own business. Granted I did it in a questionable manner, but I had to get his attention.
1
0
0
0
1
0
1039b726fccb228e
karluk yagbu state can somebody write about karluk yagbu state. http://e-history.kz/en/contents/view/309
0
0
0
0
0
0
1039f4b5208d857c
And no, the workgroup was never created. Not enough people responded one way or another ( Maybe once we can get Shojo Beat and Shonen Jump copyedited and, hopefully, to GA, it will spur more interest.
0
0
0
0
0
0
103a063afb7fad7c
I'm making some substantial changes and additions to this entry, also improving the citations. I'm working on this as part of the UNC Edit-a-thon, 14 April 2013.
0
0
0
0
0
0
103b1639ebb25a6a
"|That ""today"" was a typo I noticed and was going to fix. It should have read. Furthermore looking at the blocking policy I see that it is enough to say I won't do it again. Today I really want more to get that mediation overwith. However I must also say that I expect civility in return from him. Which is something I have never gotten. Thus implying I won't do it again ever. Since apparetly it can be an insult to refer to Dicklyon as Dick then I will just call him Dicklyon from now on. Which should not confuse him into thinking he is being insulted. (I even expressly said I was not at first calling him ""a dick"". What more could I have done?)"
0
0
0
0
0
0
103b9c750c6476cf
In both headers, eh? Learn to read. — | talk
0
0
0
0
0
0
103bf08640b63f40
Corrected. Thee are countless ahs all over China. D
0
0
0
0
0
0
103c580a50219070
If on the other hand you made the edit that was removed in June, then if you follow the link provided in the message you will I'm sure see that what was removed was clearly vandalism and I would ask you to refrain from doing it again.
0
0
0
0
0
0
103c69dc6cea98e8
carlo I counted the jan 1983 match at chicago tournament of champions(played indoors) as part of the 1982 season as it was played before the 1983 jan masters, which is regared as part of the 1982 season you have 2 extra matches the oregon challenge of 1982 and south korean challenge of 1983. otherwise my list matches yours. You will have noticed that some people wish to erase borg's 1982 performances from the record . As fas as l'm concerned inspecial tournament he played well and had no bad losses; so he is a legit player. Tennus expert is acting like a pain in the neck again. Date ranges are preferable and self explanatory. the man is so[petty and full of himself its beyond a joke. You should change the date to finish of the event like the french version if you can't do the date range. Laver often played more than 2 events in a week like his wins at bretton woods and canadian open in the week of 10-16 aug 1970 jeffreyneave 30 april 2008
0
0
0
0
0
0
103f144ccb67a87c
or List of Deputy Lieutenants
0
0
0
0
0
0
104037d8ac6abc77
Independent music Go for it. It also might be worth going for a COTW on that article. On other matters, I'm currently working on Pixies discography; do you think I should include all the promotional singles?
0
0
0
0
0
0
10415ee4e7c7b119
" what country I wish the writer would point out what country he is refering to, whith his mention of sherrif depts etc. Why not preface such comments with...""in america.."" "
0
0
0
0
0
0
10417618c4320e8a
In fact, would anyone object to my changing of the apostrophe's status on these pages (id est, making it go away)?
0
0
0
0
0
0
10422e916125158d
She has plenty of real-world references, thank you. I am an editor and can create or change pages. You are being disruptive.
0
0
0
0
0
0
10433b36e6d45b15
" Wester Civ Hello, I had gotten an e-mail from one of Western Civ's fans asking why they don't have a wikipedia page. I remembered that there had been one at one point in time so I traced it back to you. I am not an active wiki user, so I do hope you forgive my lack of knowledge on how this works. I have read the reason for deletion and I have also read all of the criteria that must be met by a band to be considered notable. If I read the deletion log correctly I see that the reason for deletion was listed as ""expired prod - borderline db-band"" That said, I am including (as references) in this message links to their three published albums, a list of press garnered and links to some of their fan pages online. If you google the words ""Western Civ"" the band is the second and third return on google. I do believe that these elements are all examples of ""Notability"" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(music) as Wikipedia defines it for music. Since the page ""Western Civ"" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Civ is simply being used to redirect people to the ""Western Culture"" article at the moment, I do hope you will reestablish this page to it's original form, as a wiki for the band ""Western Civ"" References: Link to Western Civ's published works: www.cdbaby.com/all/westernciv Link to Western Civ's media press kit which includes 10 (of over 100) published reviews and articles about ""Western Civ"" as well as a partial list of FM stations that are playing Western Civ's music: www.sonicbids.com/westernciv Links to Western Civ's websites: www.myspace.com/westernciv www.twitter.com/westernciv www.westerncivrock.com Please let me know where to go from here. I'll be looking forward to speaking with you further. Thank You, manager, Western Civ"
0
0
0
0
0
0
1043ac737930e427
" Penis envy From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search For the Crass album, see Penis Envy (album). For the Virgin 1 documentary, see ....Envy. Penis envy in Freudian psychoanalysis refers to the theorized reaction of a girl during her psychosexual development to the realization that she does not have a penis. Freud considered this realization a defining moment in the development of gender and sexual identity for women. According to Freud, the parallel reaction in boys to the realization that girls do not have a penis is castration anxiety. In contemporary culture, the term is sometimes used symbolically or metaphorically to refer to the idea that women wish they had a penis, or to refer to anxieties between men about the size of their genitals. Contents [hide] * 1 Freud's Theory o 1.1 Criticisms of Freud’s theory + 1.1.1 Within psychoanalytic circles + 1.1.2 Feminist criticisms * 2 Male penis envy * 3 See also * 4 References * 5 External links [edit] Freud's Theory Sigmund Freud introduced the concept of a little girl's interest in—and envy of— the penis in his 1908 article ""On the Sexual Theories of Children,"" but did not fully develop the idea until substantially later in 1914 when his work On Narcissism was published. It was not mentioned in the first edition of Freud's earlier Three Contributions to the Theory of Sex (1905). The term came to significance as Freud gradually refined his views of female sexuality, coming to describe a mental process he believed occurred in girls as they passed through the Electra complex from the phallic stage to the latency stage (see Psychosexual development). In Freud’s psychosexual development theory, the phallic stage (approximately between the ages of 3.5 and 6) is the first period of development in which the libidinal focus is primarily on the genital area. Prior to this stage, the libido (broadly defined by Freud as the primary motivating energy force within the mind) focuses on other physiological areas. For instance, in the oral stage, in the first 12 to 18 months of life, libidinal needs concentrate on the desire to eat, sleep, suck and bite. The theory suggests that the penis becomes the organ of principal interest to both sexes in the phallic stage. This becomes the catalyst for a series of pivotal events in psychosexual development. These events—known as the Oedipus complex for boys and the Electra complex for girls—result in significantly different outcomes for each gender because of differences in anatomy. For girls: * Soon after the libidinal shift to the penis, the child develops her first sexual impulses towards her mother. * The girl realizes that she is not physically equipped to have a heterosexual relationship with her mother, since she does not have a penis. * She desires a penis, and the power that it represents. This is described as penis envy. She sees the solution as obtaining her father’s penis. * She develops a sexual desire for her father. * The girl blames her mother for her apparent castration (what she sees as punishment by the mother for being attracted to the father) assisting a shift in the focus of her sexual impulses from her mother to her father. * Sexual desire for her father leads to the desire to replace and eliminate her mother. * The girl identifies with her mother so that she might learn to mimic her, and thus replace her. * The child anticipates that both aforementioned desires will incur punishment (by the principle of lex talionis) * The girl employs the defence mechanism of displacement to shift the object of her sexual desires from her father to men in general. The offshoot of these events, often cited in the media and colloquially, is that a girl really wants to become her mother, so that she can control her father. A similar process occurs in boys of the same age as they pass through the phallic stage of development. The key differences being that the focus of sexual impulses need not switch from mother to father, and that the fear of castration (castration anxiety) remains. The boy desires his mother, and identifies with his father, whom he sees as having the object of his sexual impulses. Furthermore, the boy’s father, being the powerful aggressor of the family unit, is sufficiently menacing that the boy employs the defense mechanism of displacement to shift the object of his sexual desires from his mother to women in general. Freud thought this series of events occurred prior to the development of a wider sense of sexual identity, and was required for an individual to continue to enter into his or her gen
1
0
0
0
0
0
1043e15fb9601def
Hrafn PM, Where did Hrafn go? There was a proper method to retire from WP, but he did not use it. Instead, it sounded like he was depressed and wanted an Admin to do it for him. It would be nice to have him back, and, as his friendly nemesis, I have asked him to come back. Perhaps your should do the same.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1043eb89a5c06bf0
A weak analogy; a student in Florida will have Facebook friends from many places; not only his home-town, but fellow followers of Facebook interest group or games; we have no reason to suppose Eusebius included anybody who wasn't Christian. Nor do I treat this as fiction: What I said was that Eusebius may understand those numbers as poorly as his calculation that the Nativity took place under Herod in 3 BC. He asserts both and they are incompatible... But if it were fiction: One of the points of Crime and Punishment is the populousness of Saint Petersburg; many Russian novels, on the other hand, make a point of the restricted social circle of a country village. If we had no other evidence, we could guess at the size of Saint Petersburg and the sixe of an average village (and especially the nobles in a village{ and not be faacros of hundreds and thousands off. PMAnderson
0
0
0
0
0
0
104457a8b777f391
"::I'll alos be looking in to see how this is going, as GRC is a big deal around these parts. Seek his grace "
0
0
0
0
0
0
10454ebc4f169b29
" The Ezekiel passage is quoted in the Moloch article in the 1899 Encyclopædidia Biblica as the strongest evidence for the theory that the offerings were considered to be to Yahweh (along with Jeremiah 7.31). Both passages are also cited in the Moloch aritlce in the 1908 Catholic Encyclopedia which reponds rather weakly (in my opinion): ""But this position is to say the least improbable. The texts appealed to may well be understood otherwise, and the prophets expressly treat the cult of Moloch as foreign and as an apostasy from the worship of the true God."" It is cited in 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica: Moloch] with the comment: ""Note, also, the attitude of Ezekiel in xx. 25 seq., 31, references which cannot be explained away."" The article The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia: Molech; Moloch] treats it rather strangely, remarking:That this prophet regarded the practice as among the ""statutes that were not good, and ordinances wherein they should not live"" (Ezekiel 20:25) given by God to His people, by way of deception and judicial punishment, as some hold, is highly improbable and inconsistent with the whole prophetic attitude toward it. It is not clear what this means, quoting parts of the passage and paraphasing part of it and then adding ""as some hold"". This article shows itself elsewhere quite aware of the theory that infants were sacrificed to Yahweh. It also brings in bogus Moloch-worship in connection to Carthage. Not a good article in any case. Three different Rabbinical interpretations of the Ezekiel passage appear at . The interpretation by Rashi accords with the most obvious meaning, disliked by TRS, but the writer finds this inconvincing as not in accord with his own theology and prefers another interpretation. That would not be a reason to suppress Rashi's interpretation and the writer does not do so. There is a discussion at which covers in part John Day's treatment favorably but also discusses the Ezekiel passage in respect to the problem of the people's belief (and apparently Ezekiel's beliefs) that commands which Ezekiel saw as bad came from Yahweh. Note, John Day believes Moloch is not Yahweh, but that still does not answer the problems with that passage. In short, the passage has been long used in support of the theory that the offerings of children lmlk was understood as commanded by Yahweh. It has long been in general a problem pasage. But those who feel that it is being misinterpreted do not suppress it. It is dishonest to present a theory that has been held and still is held and suppress its strongest supporting argument. On could respond by citing the Catholic Encyclopedia response (which seems to me weak). But add it with a citation if you will. But do not suppress. The inclusion is not editorializing by me. I am presenting various theories that are held along with evidence for and against. The Ezekiel passage is cited as part of a common argument that children were sacrificed to Yahweh and normally used as support for that argument, indeed one of the main sources for that argument. My own POV, as much as I have one, is that the evidence is confused, there are good arguments as well as weaknesses in various positions, and that one should present all sides ... though of course full discussion would be a book length article. Your particular POV on a Biblical passages is not grounds to suppress it when cited with a different interpretation, especially when it is normally cited in the Moloch context by sources usually considered reputable, sometimes very much supporting the POV that the sacrifices were to Yahweh. Even when when that interpretation is rejected the Ezekiel passage is still cited in discussion. I don't believe that anything I have included in this article, including the Ezekiel passage, is non-standard for discussion of Moloch. I have tried to present the vanilla arguments and give enough information to allow them to be understood. One obviously cannot agree with all sides. Moloch cannot easily be at once Yahweh, an entirely different god, the name of a kind of sacrifice. Passing through fire cannot be at the same time a human sacrifice or an initiation ceremony. But people do hold different views and the task of the article is to explain these views and give their history. It should be obvious now that your original feeling that this material was novel was incorrect. Please let the normal statements used as arguments stand, regardless of the positions. I am restoring the passage with some reasonable weasel words to make it clearer that this is the expound
0
0
0
0
0
0
10461c1de0cc580e
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
0
0
0
0
0
0
10475b93618827dd
Any complaints with that as the new wording?
0
0
0
0
0
0
1048229416d150f7
" I also disagree with the merge as Strength athlete clearly refers to strong sportspeople in general rather than anything to do with competitions or feats based on strength alone. I'm removing the merge tags now. (edits) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1048aab1dfcaff87
" If one were to present arguments against it, the fact that it's taken shamelessly out of context is the stronger objection. I can't imagine that serious Muslim exegetes would grasp at this ephemeral straw. I see Ahmed Deedat, Zakir Naik, etc. They're more prominent than Rashid, but have no scholarly standing. Anything better? If there's a serious history of this, we should include it, but we wouldn't use a statement from a television evangelist, even a very prominent one, to say, ""Christians argue/believe …"" "
0
0
0
0
0
0
1048b47d95d969e3
I just wanted to say thank you for your nice images of Yucatán, where I lived years ago but unfortunatly have few good photos. Cheers,
0
0
0
0
0
0
1049d7610f7b18e0
I decided I'd rather edit elsewhere since he seems to be so happy with a vacuous little fluff piece like this. is clearly a personal attack. Unfocussed entire attitude to this article is negative, quite why I've offended him I'm unsure. If this article is so unimportant to her, she should leave it alone. As to my adding content... I've been attacked before for autobiography. Now you're attacking me for non-autobiography. Make up your minds. As to the science: the papers are most important. .
0
0
0
0
0
0
1049e4e98460bd45
Lists of television series episodes
0
0
0
0
0
0