Datasets:
tasksource
/
jigsaw_toxicity

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
1
id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
0cf9bf4604a90971
Oppose until the actual new version is published. While it should no doubt be reflected in the article that this change is under consideration, I don't know whether it's really necessary to have it merged as soon as some slight information about the draft is found. 78.105.161.115
0
0
0
0
0
0
0cfa931dcc9e5f76
Why does nobody post anything on 'my talk' that's weird... how do you access someone else's page and comment on it... I'm new... help! ) Squeakybird
0
0
0
0
0
0
0cfa971d02fd866b
Manusmriti Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Manusmriti, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0cfac55cd259ea1a
fock you barack obama
1
0
1
0
1
0
0cfad0acc69d43fe
" Mark manly bertrand A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mark manly bertrand, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add to the top of Mark manly bertrand. (Talk, ) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0cfbe46f2f16c132
This is not a treasure hunt nor a mystery. The information is located in the back of the Technocracy Study Course. http://technocracy-incorporated.wikispaces.com/space/showimage/Technocracy%2520study%2520guide.pdf Technocracy%20study%20guide.pdf (application/pdf Object) That information was boiled down and presented there. It is that simple. Why turn this into a mysterious adventure when it is not ? The pertinent information is there. That is the energy survey. It is the relevant facts regarding the resource base of North America. North America contains about 52 % of the worlds resource base. That was the figure when the Study Course was published. That figure is now higher due to the use of the rest of the world of their limited resource base. ( )
0
0
0
0
0
0
0cfc9afa9dd2f1b9
" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. » talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0cfcaa52a5c9d1ef
REDIRECT Talk:The Suppression of Religious Houses Act 1539
0
0
0
0
0
0
0cfda8482e69ce0d
irc.freenode.net wikipedia host cloak I would like a wikipedia cloak on IRC. My IRC nick is bsmntbombdood. I have followed all the steps at Wikipedia:IRC cloaks. Thanks.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0cfe83119682203c
Absolutely. This guy's more trouble than he's worth, so make it an indef. block.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0cfef9f9854da18f
Apparently I wasn't clear enough the first time Well it has been a while sine I your pompous flame diety has been here. However it has come to my attention that you are not living up to our standards. In otherwords fucker you are out. You live in Paterson, New Jersey and use Verizon Internet Services Inc. WE ARE LEGION WE DO NOT FORGIVE WE DO NOT FORGET EXPECT US Apparently I wasn't clear enough the first time Well it has been a while sine I your pompous flame diety has been here. However it has come to my attention that you are not living up to our standards. In otherwords fucker you are out. You live in Paterson, New Jersey and use Verizon Internet Services Inc. WE ARE LEGION WE DO NOT FORGIVE WE DO NOT FORGET EXPECT US Apparently I wasn't clear enough the first time Well it has been a while sine I your pompous flame diety has been here. However it has come to my attention that you are not living up to our standards. In otherwords fucker you are out. You live in Paterson, New Jersey and use Verizon Internet Services Inc. WE ARE LEGION WE DO NOT FORGIVE WE DO NOT FORGET EXPECT US Apparently I wasn't clear enough the first time Well it has been a while sine I your pompous flame diety has been here. However it has come to my attention that you are not living up to our standards. In otherwords fucker you are out. You live in Paterson, New Jersey and use Verizon Internet Services Inc. WE ARE LEGION WE DO NOT FORGIVE WE DO NOT FORGET EXPECT US Apparently I wasn't clear enough the first time Well it has been a while sine I your pompous flame diety has been here. However it has come to my attention that you are not living up to our standards. In otherwords fucker you are out. You live in Paterson, New Jersey and use Verizon Internet Services Inc. WE ARE LEGION WE DO NOT FORGIVE WE DO NOT FORGET EXPECT US Apparently I wasn't clear enough the first time Well it has been a while sine I your pompous flame diety has been here. However it has come to my attention that you are not living up to our standards. In otherwords fucker you are out. You live in Paterson, New Jersey and use Verizon Internet Services Inc. WE ARE LEGION WE DO NOT FORGIVE WE DO NOT FORGET EXPECT US Apparently I wasn't clear enough the first time Well it has been a while sine I your pompous flame diety has been here. However it has come to my attention that you are not living up to our standards. In otherwords fucker you are out. You live in Paterson, New Jersey and use Verizon Internet Services Inc. WE ARE LEGION WE DO NOT FORGIVE WE DO NOT FORGET EXPECT US Apparently I wasn't clear enough the first time Well it has been a while sine I your pompous flame diety has been here. However it has come to my attention that you are not living up to our standards. In otherwords fucker you are out. You live in Paterson, New Jersey and use Verizon Internet Services Inc. WE ARE LEGION WE DO NOT FORGIVE WE DO NOT FORGET EXPECT US Apparently I wasn't clear enough the first time Well it has been a while sine I your pompous flame diety has been here. However it has come to my attention that you are not living up to our standards. In otherwords fucker you are out. You live in Paterson, New Jersey and use Verizon Internet Services Inc. WE ARE LEGION WE DO NOT FORGIVE WE D
1
0
0
0
0
0
0cff1e0189b36d76
No problem I was thinking of creating yet another sockpuppet anyway. I edit those comments in question because they contain a link to a hate site wherein the subject is my person. Since none of YOU boobs will do anything about it (despite being informed repeatedly), I had to take manners into my own hands. Sue me if you don't like it, Dorothy.
0
0
0
0
1
0
0cff83251f6a4cab
You are my bitch! I own your ass.
1
1
1
0
1
0
0d002833b7c31211
Captions tell the history of an aircraft - if you are going to have a picture of an aircraft then you need to tell its story and background - this is only common sense if not for readability then for accuracy in reference. If you were to google F-16 this article is one of the first to be found so this make accuracy and completeness essential in these article (and it does not add too much more in size). If wikipedia was a dictionary then a simple caption would be ok but tbut wikipedia is more then it is becoming a valuable reference tool as such accuracy and details is essential
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d0118d27e4d0e03
" {{unblock | reason= Derogatory comments about other contributors may be removed by any editor. The statement is not about content I've added to this entry- of which there isn't any to speak of. (I could have opinions and theories about his mother but I don't go around posting them). Instead User:scray choose to post the following message and block me. ""I don't see much evidence that this user is constructively engaged in improving this page or basing content on reliable sources."" This is equally as offensive as were the comments of the other editors- nor is the statement even true. You don't see much evidence because my properly sourced submissions are reverted. I ask you or any other editor to show me one misuse of a source. This is a a link to my last edit on the entry. diff I include it as it was correctly sourced using per-approved sources that had consensus and the changes concerning definitions in the entry were discussed on the talk page and also had consensus.. Disruptive edit, not an improvement? That opinion is not supportable. The changes were made to bring the entry into compliance with WP:lead standards because the definitions were faulty. . Now I ask you (again #2), what content have I submitted on that page that had an unreliable source as you've alleged when blocking me? You have made the same unfounded accusation as the other two editors. Regardless of what you think of another editor's edits, keep that to your self! If you post a derogatory comment about me and can't back up the statement, you are lying too apparently simply in an attempt to damage my credibility. It is that simple. Now I formally ask you to Point out the reference are referring to in your negative posts about me! This is not a difference of opinion. It is a fabrication and a personal attack upon my credibility. Comment on content, not on the contributor. You commented on both! and were not truthful in your comment about the content and sources. Derogatory comments about other contributors may be removed by any editor. Instead, you added more of them. In addition, for like the fourth time, this person decides to call me ""a full blown believer and pusher of this conspiracy theory"" which I repeatedly denied. I took offense. Both other editors received talk messages from me. After you came along, One editor user: Dbrodbeck apologized for his statement.. I appreciate that and accept his apology and will tell him so when unblocked. The other person user:Brangifer received a call for truce on his talk page but refused to retract his comment. He has repeated attacked my credibility and now has thrown out a serious accusation without one shred of foundation or substance and banned me from his talk page. His badgering continues on the entry talk page without apology or any shred of anything to substantiate his offensive comment. To have User:scray come along and say stuff like "" Regardless of what you think of another editor's edits, name-calling (a personal attack) won't go well."" I did not call a name. I called a spade a spade and gave good evidence that I was calling it as it presented itself. I did not comment on his edits, I commented the fact that he did not consider my reference to articles from the Washington post, San Francisco Chronicle, Associated press, and National archives of the Government of Canada to be reliable sources. Unbelievably, you seem be echoing his position. I probably won't post this elsewhere but if you can't show me an example of using a poor source on that page, it is obvious that you have also posted the same fabrication about me in reference to sources. Anyone who fabricates or perpetuates or posts derogatory information is a liar. Liars cannot be trusted and lying editors compromise the integrity of WP. user:Scray said ""I don't see much evidence that this user is constructively engaged in improving this page or basing content on reliable sources."" User:scray needs to show me where evidence was seen by him that had I based something in the entry on an unreliable source (#3). User:scray can not substantiate the posted comment the made. If you don't prove it with an example, then your statement is a lie. If you find yourself in this situation, then you are a liar and you have personally attacked this editors credibility. If that is the case, I'd
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d01219d5e7f9401
Al Fateh Hi, I noted that you nominated Al Fateh for deletion. I have fixed that nomination by completing steps two and three of the AfD process as the discussion was not appearing on the log page. I have posted you this message for your information and for your future deletion nominations.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d01679b5dc5a9b3
"I am not in a feud with anybody, and I do not believe that I have any political opponents. If an admin reinstates disruption by others, that admin should be blocked for disruption himself. Why do you believe that no action should be taken against obvious personal attacks such as the one that triggered my block? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d0179314ea7facf
]] Transformers: Rescue Boots [[Family Game Night (TV series)|Family Game Night
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d01ce29914d6215
" Now I see that Off2riorob is also undoing your edit, 4twenty42o. I think he didn't read the discussion here, or the note that you put on your edit, where it was explained that his rendering (""would not confirm"") was a distortion of what was said in the source. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d029ae543673076
The article David clary (albemarle) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d02bef33f288414
You reverted me and gave a reason when I called it external links, I reverted you and gave a reason again. I don't see the dispute. Now, if you read verifiability, self published sources are reliable published sources: At the other end of the reliability scale lie personal websites, weblogs (blogs), bulletin boards, and Usenet posts, which are not acceptable as sources. Rare exceptions may be when a well-known professional person or acknowledged expert in a relevant field has set up a personal website using his or her real name. Even then, we should proceed with caution, because the information has been self-published, which means it has not been subject to any independent form of fact-checking. So if the person who wrote this can be found to be an acknowledged expert in a relevent feild, then it can be a reference. If he has not, then it can not. Simple?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d0537d088fee59f
" ""Caliber"" The film has another team called ""Caliber"" , rather than Calibre. Is that team supposed to be American? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d055c9130a366d3
Yes, indeed, well done, you have just destroyed many years of work and comprimsing. Really great work, you have created what not so many have done before, you have created chaos.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d0574a61f50543d
eat my shit Title says it all.
1
0
1
0
0
0
0d05f7995d3fcce9
As far as I know the Macedonians were Greek. I didn't see this passage but I believe you. It doesn't alter the fact that Athens was the source though. Alexander himself had thorough Greek education.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d067ad21ff26be4
hello wht is this all about cause i have no idea what your talking bout so please stop writing me honey pooh.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d077b68c734308b
, You taking money from /r/gamerghazi and continuing to edit Gamergate related articles IS out of line
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d07d5b2b8e801f3
Welcome! Welcome to Wikipedia, ! My name is Ryan, aka . I noticed that you were new and haven't received any messages yet. I just wanted to see how you were doing. Wikipedia can be a little intimidating at first, since it uses different formatting than other sites that use HTML and CSS. In the long run, though, you'll find that the WikiSyntax is a lot easier and faster than those other ways. Here are a few links to get you started: How to edit a page Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial Picture tutorial How to write a great article There are a lot of policies and guides to read, but I highly recommend reading over those first. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Please be sure to sign your name on Talk using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, along with a link to your user page. This way, others know when you left a message and how to find you. It's easier than having to type out your name, right? ) I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. We can use all the help we can get! Have a nice day. Sincerely, . 10:01, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d08935c2fd45dc2
Stop pushing POV here. Only The Hindu speculated (without source) 250 crore as revenue. Remember Enthiran is the biggest grosser in Tamil, not Dasa. Taran Adarsh estimated Enthiran's gross at 255.5 crore. So, Dasa must be lower than that.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d09b78e57c7408a
—Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) YouTube is not considered a reliable source. Please see WP:RELIABLE and WP:YOUTUBE.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d0a10fade79dbee
" :Image:Angelg2.png has been listed for deletion An image or media file you uploaded, Image:Angelg2.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you."
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d0c576d37217d7d
S'okay... the kid's courting another block, if you ask me... If you think it necessary, I'll warn him, but warning him has done very little good in the past...
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d0c88ce18f23e96
Exercise reports Your call for consensus is foolish and short sighted. The idea of drawing conclusions from exercises is very much flawed for all the reasons given ad nauseum. Consensus cannot change facts. Wikipedia is not taken very seriously as it is. Why add ammunition? Georgie cannot keep such a large block (virtually all of the east coast on Verizon's network blocked forever. Once the blocks are removed there will be a revision and edit war all over again. Signed You know who.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d0d5b767c859f82
External Links You are currently engaged in a revert war over a link that you have not made a single arguement on the talk page to justify or remove. WP:EL does not require the link to contain information not in any other Wikipedia article, but to contain information relevant to the current article that could not be covered in it once it reaches Featured Article status, which CR does. CR provides a more detailed timeline then can ever be provided inside the article, and further that is shown simpyl by the existence of a timeline article. If the information in CR could be included in the article, we would not have a split off article obviously. So I ask you to participate on the talk page and use Wikipedia guidelines and policies to make your arguement as it would be more pursuasive then simply reverting without explanation based on more then personal opinion and feelings. Thank you.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d0e23ea699eaea3
" Sure - just take a look at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Jj137.   (talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d0e5b1d08f5fa0e
" May 2006 (UTC) As far as I know it has been stated that several ""universes"" do not fit into the actual accepted universe of Wold Newton which integrates with the DC comics universe thanks to Alan Moore. Thus Marvel only corresponds to the universe due to the cross-over connections or with the exception of Steven Rogers and Peter Parker whose worlds do not clash with the DC Universe chronology. As for Star Wars it is speculated that it could be linked to the Wold Newton Universe, only Star Wars takes place in an entirely different future-past element, basically a universe that predates that of the Earth. And Tolkien's universe is also out of context due to the complex mythology that has no links outside of its realm, the same applies to Dungeons & Dragons, World of Warcraft and Warhammer. However the world of faeries is related thanks to King Arthur and Shakespeare as well as C.S. Lewis and Hans Christian Anderson/Brothers Grimm. Harry Potter's world also doesn't tie in to the Wold Newton as far as I have seen. And as for Looney Tunes and Disney the only way they might tie-in is through WHo Framed Roger Rabbit which has as of yet to be linked. Of course this is still a lot of debate as to what fits in and what doesn't, the only reason I added the list was to inform the reader as to why the characters from those ""universes"" or ""worlds"" were not present. Perhaps it could be stated that although they are not ""accepted"" within the universe it is yet to be seen whether or not they are truly acknowledged as being apart from it as a whole. Piecraft 04:50, 22"
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d0e64eb2724f6ea
under the guise of attempting
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d0f89459e4742b8
" So far nobody's reverted me so that gives me hope. Meantime, let me pick your brain on a broader related issue. In recent years, Wikipedia has likely gained in importance as a ""vetting"" tool for employers, clients and others considering doing business with someone. Naturally, the one doing the vetting has the lion's share of responsibility in judging an entry's reliability and supplementing it with other research. That said, do we bear some degree of ethical obligation to researchers to ensure an entry presents, as far as possible, an accurate, well-rounded picture of the subject? In the case of Ms. Caesar, I was concerned that universities or other organizations looking to employ her and/or give her some sort of public platform would come away with the impression that nothing about her merits further scrutiny. What are your thoughts? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d0fcef9a00c89a6
I said I would do that, correct! But I notice the other party also did NOT do that. Innocent until proven guilty? Why do you take the side of the Wikipedian? It is simply because s/he has taken the time to register for an account? I mean, is that really fair? Until the other user states his/her side, can't we just leave it locked or WITHOUT the offending content? It makes me so irate that I have to keep coming back to this page defending my thoughts. Can't you take a (neutral) side and decide for yourself what needs to be done, anyway?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d119331f328d166
Copyright issues Please do not claim to be the author of works you are not the author of. If you continue to do so you risk being blocked.©
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d12b99610ea468b
If and when a second season is announced, I would split that information and the episode list to Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (Season 1).
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d12ecffb509b847
Ozzie Cheers for being a little more alert than me. Didn't notice the version I was reverting to was vadalised too
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d135c3babdfc79a
Dubstar singer's accent I've just replied to your question about Sarah Blackwood from Dubstar's accent at Talk:Dubstar. Don't know if you're watching the page, since you asked the question last November, so thought I'd let you know. 62.31.190.206
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d13b5302802a93e
" CVU on IRC Hi ! This is just to let you know that the Counter-Vandalism Unit has a presence on IRC and we'd love you to join us! You can get to the channel with the following link: (Use the blue link to open the #wikipedia-cvu channel in your current IRC client (if you have one) or use the green link for a handy IRC web-client!) If you'd like to find out more about Wikipedia on IRC then check out the IRC page on meta or contact me on my talk-page. Please also extend this invitation to any active CVU/CVUA members you know as IRC is a great way to communicate and coordinate! Thanks, I hope to see you there soon! (Talk)(Contribs) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d13fc1e03e76e3f
" Go to article ""Bayt Nattif"" at the article's Talk Page there "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d17a7480f03015c
History Any reason why it's called Andrew?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d17ad5df146d4f2
i lookd back in history when it was put it had link 2 extern gc site, sum1 removed that link so ur a fucking liar about no source.
1
0
1
0
1
0
0d189e22a297a2d9
"Hmmmmmm. perhaps the last statement needs some rewording after all.Maybe ""Dalit Christians do not hold as much arable land as the upper-caste Christians"" is better. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d19b2fd593740c0
(UTC) And still it suddenly turned out that they had indeed sold more outside the US... 21:19, 22 March 2011
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d1a4aafac710598
okay, a question. It is a fact that over 2/3rds of the coutry is rural. then isn tit obvious that atleast half will be OBC SC/STs
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d1aaf2d156c0500
Communication Preferences Use email for casual contact and faster response to questions, queries, and interactive discussions.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d1c5d9debcb2dc6
I stronly disagree with you, i am simply replying to what he said, if i said something wrong, delete that,not everything, i deeply and 100% reject your reply, I also put back all other conversation other leave, because in the meantime you revert and others leave it, you have no manners and ethics at all.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d1cabe48248b01b
(posted on the discussion page at 00:31 UTC on 7 November 2006)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d1d3013a9a7cd9f
Also, another thing I'm not sure about, but anyone with a stronger knowledge on the group can affirm it. Based on their debut's album cover and photos of the group, it looks as if they were initially a quartet. Can anyone with the first album find who this fourth member was?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d1d71cce63d4c31
Olše was not invented by Czech nationalists. It was invented by Polish teachers from Galicia who came to teach on the newly established Polish high school in Teschen (established in 1895) and thought Olza is not Polish enough. (Other names suggested by these teachers were Olszawa (Olšava in old Czech maps), etc.) I really start to get annoyed by the nationalistic rubbish you keep on inserting here, Darwinek!
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d1e413cf53f2797
" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Tire. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d1e918570bb2196
" inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/25Live The nominator changed his vote to ""keep"" and noted in one of his edit summaries that notability has been established. The original article has been greatly improved and there are no delete votes. Care to close as speedy keep? '''' Michael Q.'' "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d1f474e84e52917
" The First Division is included, but only for years when it was the top tier of English football. The top tier is the only relevant level. If you want to include Second Division titles, you're really only acknowledging that one club was in the Second Division longer than the other, and that's not anything worth shouting about. And would you please stop talking about ""major"" trophies. They're just trophies, there's nothing major or minor about them. – Jay "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d200ed3f5ca6a14
Canterbury Why remove reference to pallium as charge? Wiki's own Archbishop of Canterbury has a depiction of the arms, which have historically been impaled with the bishop's own arms as his new personal escutcheon.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d2038d1e618e3a1
" cannot decipher, and punitive actions. As to the other complaints against me, I obtained a user name about the time I was being blocked for 24 hours for multiple reverts. This block was supposedly sent to a talk page that I never registered (my IPA talk page) and would not use if I could help it: I would prefer not to broadcast my IPA. Later, when I autosigned (which left my IPA behind as a signature), I believed I was logged on as Dylan Hunt, and certainly not trying to ""hide"" behind an IPA. Common sense should suggest that no one would ""hide"" behind an IPA since these are more public than a user name."
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d20a2f8c6f24002
Welcome! Hello, Dparisi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question. Again, welcome!
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d20b8858b817e0a
" musings hey friday while blocked the past two days i read through your subpages. things like /admin etc. they are great! i'm burning out on this project editing can be a lot of fun but in the recent past i've received so many hassles from editors following me around and admins interpreting policies liberally in order to block me. i also saw that i'm not the only one who's been on the receiving end of this. i've seen it all but its too long to go into here. i'm not sure if these are new trends or just something i haven't spent the time to look into before. ""mere editors"" really have little recourse in this. filing arbitration proved exhausting for me in the past. it required a huge amount of diff hunting and discussion for what seemed to me was a pretty obvious case of an out-of-line editor. filing against an admin would, i assume, be much, much worse. admins seem to behave like inner-city police with their wall of silence. a lot of your comments show that you've noticed the same happenings. in an ideal world i think you are right people would behave reasonably...but i am pessimistic that will happen. i have come to the conclusion that the only solution is to firm up wikis policies. we need to define what something like ""disruption"" is. when someone is blocked for a personal attack, the diff should be included. that a requirement for including evidence is controversial is evidence that it time for change; we've tried the ""trust admins to do what is right"". it has failed. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d211a801f437d50
" Fair use rationale for Image:A_to_Z_(Butterfinger).jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:A_to_Z_(Butterfinger).jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d21fd4bf0c3e8f5
Inserting dead link. I inserted the links because they're not dead, just malfunctioning and figured somebody would repair them.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d22096912a1c17e
", and use the confusing, redundent, yet common phrase ""North America*""... *not refering to the continent. Either of two reasons: A desire to place the United States last on the list, by manipulating the names of regions to exploit the ""fair"" use of alphabetization to make the US hard to find. Simply an oversight. Well, nobody replied so I renamed the section on Territories and regions to U.N. subregions. It's amazing that this list puts the United States last, even though it has most of the people and 1/3 of the area. Is someone trying to ""de-emphasize"" America's importance? No it's just in alphabetical order. Talk about... Any info in this article about the use of the term as if it meant exclusively Canada and the United States?? Yes: in the 'Human geography' section, namely the 3rd paragraph. Other related terms are also treated in that sxn. | talk | Central Americans are not North Americans! We are own people and we are not Northerners. We are seperate from them and are nothing like them! You can try to correct me, but the people who say that we are North Americans are White folk who try to keep us down (and sometimes other ignorant groups of people). I will never surrender to being North American and nor should any other Central American should ever buy into this. I don't care what the White man tells us. They're not us. We should be able to decide for ourselves who we are and no else should tell us who to be. This is just another way of bringing us down. I am proud of being Central American and being someone who inhabited this land long before the White people made contact with us. If we have been living here for the longest time, should it not be us who decides who we want to be? -Tito A. Martĩnez This is a lovely essay, but unfortunately you cannot undeclare yourself a north american any more easily than you can underclare yourself an earthling. Central America happens to be located in North America, so Central Americans are North Americans - it's a geographical thing, not a cultural thing. Perhaps you're thinking of Latin America and Anglo America? Actually, Tito can ""undeclare himself"". If you'll check the Spanish Wikipedia articles on Central America and North America, you will see that Spanish language defines North America's southern-most country as Mexico. :es:Norteamérica redirects to es:América del Norte, which lists the lists the following political units in north to south order: Greenland Canada United States Mexico Note that Central America is not on this list! WilyD is also right, as far as English language goes. ""North America"" includes Mexico and Central America. I think America (terminology) should provide a better explanation than it currently does. A section on English vs. Spanish terminology would help. (I don't speak Spanish, but I studied French in high school and can sometimes puzzle out the meaning. Maybe I'll recruit some bilingual Wikipedians to help me write this. -) Okay, but I'll claim the fatal flaw here is this: América del Norte is a spanish term that is different from the english term North America. Tito may not be a norteamericano - (although I don't think he declares himself here either - doesn't spanish have an equivilent to L'academie?) - but he's still north american. Actually, I don't think ""North American"" is an identity that applies to Latin Americans. His country (if it's in Central America) is a part of the North American continent, but the cultural division is what he's concerned about. Want to help me update America (terminology)? I think America (terminology) reflects correct english usage. Maybe Use of the word American is a better place to move these kind of complaints (although I'm actively involved in that article, and know it'll get shot down as original research). Roughly speaking, there aren't political continents - Wikipedia has articles on Anglo America (not that I'm convinced the term exists) in contrast
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d2228ffb85e13c5
" How can I get a ""last warning"" and then get banned straight away without doing anything further. Obvious harassment."
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d22d145831935ee
user:jeppiz worships the balls of jesus son of the whore and suck the penis of user:DeCausa the bastard.
1
0
1
0
1
0
0d230ebfeabf0df0
Please do not add links back to your site - WP:EL is very clear on this. You need to suggest the link on the talkpage and OTHER editors will then decide if it should be included. I will remove any attempts to re-add the link in accordance with policy.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d23bf1702a99f93
For the umpteenth time, I understand! You're making me angry! You can remove my personal info but NOT the No Israel and Christian Fiction userboxes. I have the right to post those.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d25106bba77e949
" You forget we some times keep entire litters. YOU assume we sell them all...which is incorrect. What you don't realize is a serious breeding program has to keep a number of dogs from every litter for evaluation purposes. Like I said...I am not a dog breeder for ""business."" It is a passion that costs more than it brings in. But, hey...why am I telling you this? You obviously are not interested in the truth. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d2593a1ce0905dc
Well... You could for instance beef up 'this with '''that. Cheers,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d260e8f27bf9dfd
Piss on me P!SS ON ME, YOU BIMBO!
1
0
1
0
1
0
0d2790b0768b1562
Then who was phone??
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d286abe7682c934
Ok, you says that have created a local file information page for a file on commons, so.. how do I do that?. Regards. PD: The Grande's article needs actual images, if this can fix, I hope that it can.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d28ae577fa7e4e4
please feel free to e mail me
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d2914749f756fc2
If you would click on the photo you would know that it was taken January 10th. There is a strong chance that he was under the influence of marijuana as he seemed kind of out it, which would explain the expression on his face.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d2badc0f2416fe3
" Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia Wikipedia in eight words How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style My FAQ Page Glossary What wikipedia is not Requested Articles Reference Desk Assume good faith Sandbox (This page is for testing) I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me or an experienced wikipedian like , and and leave your message on our talk page. Again, welcome! If you want to tell me something or if you just want to say hi, leave your message under the Talk Section of | My Talk Page Once you've become an experienced Wikipedian, please take your time to visit these pages: Esperanza Counter Vandalism Unit Wikipedia Kindness Campaign Department of Fun Community Justice _anonymous_Crusher of Hopes and Dreams"
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d2d2c64b2752e93
", 15 May 2008 (UTC) Prince Felix of Schwarzenburg is at the right location. His uncle, and then his cousin, was the Fürst while Felix's position all of his life was that of a Prinz (this distinction is tougher for families where all used Fürst, like Wrede, and also titles like Herzog and Graf but it is easily determined). I am as certain as you are about Alfred III because you moved him to the numeral and the only royalty who used numerals, other than the Heinrichs Reuss, were the heads of houses and families. Friedrich Johannes Jacob Celestin von Schwarzenberg has the wrong nobiliary particle anyway, he was zu, not von. He was also a junior prince because he had an older brother who outlived him who was also ""the"" Prince (John Adolph II). I don't mind leaving the German ""von"" or ""zu"" for princes of territories if the title isn't used. For instance, Felix zu Schwarzenburg and Prince Felix of Schwarzenburg would both be acceptable but not a mixture. Adolph von Auersperg had an older brother who died after him but a source I have gives Adolph's title as Fürst, which wouldn't make sense. I would leave him be for now and ask on his page if he was head of the house. Prince Karl of Auersperg is actually the brother in question so logic would mean that he was the Fürst but again, I would ask on the page. Charles 17:04"
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d2f2b6cd36e4cd0
True, I've been off-topic. But I insist that, by logic, protestors who perceive China as a dictatorship is not the equlivalent, or represent, anti-dictatorial protestors (I've never even heard of such a thing - sounds more like political framing). Would those who protest the perceived dictatorship in Saudi Arabia go on to protest against China? Rarely. Anti-dictatorial is not a single classification - it should not even be a classification, in my opinion. I would suggest a more lengthy wording - e.g. supporters who call for more individual freedom in China.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d2f51db3bd78bd8
Why do you think I am a troll? 91.55.97.142
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d307ce0d3c2038b
If the phenomenon is bad, then what caused the phenomenon is also bad. I.e if murder is bad, so is the murderer. Nobody I've ever heard from said that the stagflation of the 70's was good and the stagflation of the 70's was mostl;y caused be federal Reserve policies. Deflation is much maligned by Federal Reserve through its control of th economic profession. The US did much better economically in the 1800's under deflation then after 1913 and the Feds inflation. The reason that the Fed pushes inflation is that it provides a shelter from criticism of its theft of property through the wealth transfer effect of inflation. The one doing the money printing (inflating) will always defend the process because it makes him rich.71.174.141.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d31383c6515cd67
" Speedy deletion of Vanilla (French band) A tag has been placed on Vanilla (French band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d31f21aebfadcf2
There you go, hopefully enough to satisfy those dreadful FA reviewers. ;-) Fatuorum
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d321c08a3d1d791
Looks good! Of course those (like me) who occasionally browse through the old issues will now have to browse the Archive.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d3338457bd33250
Entirely correct per the source. Move on. (send... over)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d3365bd1e2af295
|business & economic topics|in=Quebec
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d33729ccf8ffb57
STOP IT!!!!!!!!!! STOP DELETING STUFF I AM FIXING I WAS NOT DONE FIXING THE SPRING VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL PAGE!!!!!!!!!
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d33b227369ba45d
This article is not like an encyclopedia at all 'their overall strangeness' 'the legend grows' this seems like a fanzine not an encyclopedia == Headline text ==
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d33c20486723e64
Mid-race updates Just a thought. Do we really need to update the page for each mid-race retirement? Isn't that a bit unnuccessary? Why not just update it once at the end of the race?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d353faa9beec5b4
Artile name Exactly why is this article called Sir Mervyn Manningham-Buller, 3rd Baronet and not Mervyn Manningham-Buller.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d357e3fd2b53583
There are restrictions on primary documents; they can only be used for facts. If you have a site that you can upload to, fine. Otherwise you can try WikiSource and then link from there.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d35f6a96cb98dc2
IT IS VERY LIKELY THESE WILL BE MOVING SOON TO THE HURRICANE WIKI. YOU MAY WANT TO ESTABLISH AN ACCOUNT OVER THERE SO YOUR NAME ISN'T JUST A RED LINK WHEN THIS MOVES.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d361fe316282de1
" Maybe the sentence should be changed to ""the largest population transfer in European history"" or ""one of the largest population transfers in history"". 81.165.226.56 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d36cc183fd48152
" Why is the lingo/doublespeak/racist word ""contractors"" used instead of the precise English word ""mercenaries"" This is an encyclopedia not a press release. Wikipedia is not supposed to be the house organ of any one government, but this article uses a lingo/doublespeak/racist term that the USA uses to describe mercenaries of any country other than a predominantly Caucasian political ally. Wikipedia should be filtering out spin words an translating them into proper English. I suggest that ""contractor"" only be used for unarmed non-military non-police contractors. This simple rule should apply: If the term ""mercenary"" would be used to describe the job or person if the person were being paid by an agency working for an African government, the term ""mercenary"" should be used to describe the job or person working for a non-African government. End the racism. Speak in plain English. This is an encyclopedia not a press release. 50.71.210.133 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d39bef98c00f870
" Recap I decided to withhold further comment until I had some sleep and time to critique the logic behind your deletion decision. I am delaying a trip this morning so that I can provide you with a response to your statement supporting deletion. Your supporting statement for deletion is as follows: ""The result was Delete. The deletion argument was that this is original research when the article title is used to describe an algorithm, and that the references do not support the notability of the subject. Despite the verbose nature of the opposing comment, these arguments were not clearly refuted. The use of socks to give the appearance of greater support is also extremely problematic, and I have counted those opinions as being from User:Julie Dancer. Kevin (talk) "" As for ""The deletion argument was that this is original research when the article title is used to describe an algorithm..."" In reality the article title names a type of classification which arranges attributes in order of their significance. Within the deletion discussion itself the calim is made by at that other algorithms exist, namely Examples of relevant works are ""A Fast, Bottom-Up Decision Tree Pruning Algorithm with Near-Optimal Generalization"" and ""An Efficient Algorithm For Optimal Pruning Of Decision Trees"". which are capable of performing the function the article title names: If this is accurate then the right way to handle a necessary correction would be to add these algorithms to the article instead of nominating the article for deletion. In anticipation of these other algorithms being added I immediately changed the body of the text to read ""The algorithm used for this purpose..."" to ""One algorithm used for this purpose..."" Since I do not now have access to the article's history as the result of your deletion I can not give you the exact date and time. However, it was prior to the end of the deletion discussion. (Incidentally, it has been suggested by a Professor at Cornell that deleting the article was for the purpose of eliminating the article history.) Normally as a Wikipedia user I would expect other users who have an issue with such wording to correct it themselves as this is one reason the Wikipedia was setup this way. The Wikipedia still claims to be ""...the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit."" The impression I have now is that while there were an abundance of editors in the beginning who edited articles that there is now an abundance of spoiled children who expect articles to be perfect from the beginning or for someone else to edit them. They simply do not understand that each article is considered to be a work in progress and the Wikipedia being an opportunity to learn how to write and to edit rather than being completed. Instead of doing any work themselves they find it much easier to go around deleting articles which remain incomplete or have not yet reached a state of perfection, especially a maintenance edit like adding an inline reference that would require them to do any real work themselves. As for ""...references not supporting the notability of the subject"" You can not logically make this statement without reading the reference or references first and you certainly can not follow this with a statement like ""Despite the verbose nature of the opposing comment, these arguments were not clearly refuted."" All of the arguments supporting deletion are clearly refuted in the text of the primary reference to which I deferred. Just as you saying that a stop light was green in a court of law when you did not look at the light would be a lie so would be claiming the reference did not support notability when you did not read it. I know you did not read the primary reference because all arguments supporting deletion are clearly refuted by the both the primary reference and the references it contains. As for ""The use of socks to give the appearance of greater support is also extremely problematic... This shows you did not read or comprehend the response I made in the deletion discussion or only scanned it. I explained that each of the user names were created so that I could track the use of my own resources better, similar to the need on the part of the Wikipedia to require bots to have their own user name even though several may be owned by the same user. Eventually at least one of my computes will be used to accommodate bots, but currently I am able to meet all of my needs by downloading the Wikipedia and mining it off line. Since the existence of the alternate user names was stated and known by all from the beginning of the deletion discussion there is no w
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d39d2eaa40a6241
" Hello Marcruhwedell, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Finding your way around: Table of Contents Department directory Need help? Questions — a guide on where to ask questions. Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes. Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules. How you can help: Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help. Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity. Additional tips... Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your ""signature"" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you. Good luck, and have fun. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d3b57f3b2db3f03
...that's why I did ....cheers,  (talk · contribs)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d3bb1f12d90a6a2
No, it's not a delayed reaction I just happened to read your wonderful warning yesterday. Unlike you, I don't visit Wikipedia everyday. But I'm surprised to see that you are too dense to figure that out. Idiot. HA HA HA HA HA XD
1
0
0
0
1
0
0d3be13abf1bec52
" A slight difference with you I have to disagree with your comment above that some of Bbb23's actions ""border on censorship."" No, some of his actions epitomize censorship and although I am generally quite reluctant to call for administrative procedures against anyone, and am not at all knowledgeable about such procedures, I think we need to get the ball rolling in this case. As my late Dad would have said ""the guy's an utter bird."" Nobody editing on Wikipedia should have to deal with this Little Napoleon nonsense. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0d3c720db297b5a3
" Nonsense. The truth is NO schools give sufficient information about Anthroposophy on their websites. But I'll challenge you to find some that do. Not links to information - but actual information on the website. I could easily take out the ""some"" and make the sentence a lot less weasly. "
0
0
0
0
0
0