id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
08a3fdb9e86660f0
Hehe, I wonder how our Georgian and German/Austrian friedns will react when we try to put Stalin or Hitler into their collages.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08a413fbe1fe9d59
It clearly POV aside from whether or ot you share his beliefs. I feel a rewrite is in order, see Kent Hovind/NPOV for writting of a new NPOV version of this page to later be merged in to existing page.71.217.206.152
0
0
0
0
0
0
08a4623cedec17e1
Talk pages are also where some of us have to try and get uninformed idiots to back down so WE CAN MAKE CHANGES. It's hard to have an impact on an article such as thistypical Wikinonsense.
1
0
0
0
0
0
08a4d1910c23b5e9
If you really believe they should all use full names, I suggest you nominate Chansung, Taecyeon, Daesung, Yunho, Changmin, Jaejoong, Yoochun, and Junsu for renaming. Clearly there was a reason those articles use the common title.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08a504daedc58bc8
" You're quite welcome. Glad I could help. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08a70fd81e135893
Yes you got it - the Govt lied. See the talk page for CSELR (OK, I'm lazy and not typing current page name!). They provided a business case summary but not a business case that the summary was created from. I have provided the link to the index of papers produced (mainly email acceptances/rejections of meeting appointments btw) so you can confirm that the Business case was never provided. There are no source documents for any figure contained in the Business Case Summary. Some of the numbers are shown as incorrect from prior and post-TfNSW publications (such as with the Capacity claimed by GB on the MR for the Modification Approval yet the actual modification report states figures that are 50% lower.). I am one of 8 community reps for the project and am attempting to ensure the facts are put out for people to make their own minds up about. That is why I have tried to use as neutral descriptions as possible rather than emotive language. The minutes for the Community Rep meeting with TfNSW are sanitised and questions asked by the reps are not recorded not responses provided to the questions. The terms of reference (open to the public to see) for the Community Rep meetings state that all questions will be answered within a time frame yet TfNSW are refusing to do this. I have since discovered that 4 of the community reps are current employees of the State Govt and 1 is a past (self-proclaimed) senior executive of TfNSW. So not only do they not tell the truth - they have also stacked the Community Reference Group. http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/lc/lctabdoc.nsf/cccc870c6126b1b6ca2571ee000318a4/6e2b81f5c474172fca257cee0023c16a?OpenDocument&Highlight;=0,light*,rail* = link to index of docs produced for 1st call That is why there was the 2nd call for papers specifically naming the missing documents as that was the only way for the Upper House MPs to publicly state - the Govt has not provided what we asked for as they were supposedly only going to be in the 'confidential (2) boxes that the MPs could not talk about after looking at. By making the 2nd call for papers stating the docs not provided in the 1st call they made it public. The outcome they expected was what ended up happening.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08a82f036799d608
IEEE 802.11 Thanks for moving the page back to where it belongs. I'm rather new to Wikipedia and didn't know where to post the request. WP:RM would probably have been better than WP:RFD.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08a88045d0c13b83
" June 2010 (UTC) I would suggest, quite simply, that there are a few editors here who are either on the subject's shore team or part of his new PR firm. Simple math this Wiki page doesn't get a lot of hits. Probably even less than the Subject's own web page. For ""neutral"" wiki editor to spend as much time and effort.... well ...I have my doubts. We Wiki editors do not appreciate you using Wikipedia as a promotional tool. Buy an add from Google. 02:54, 13"
0
0
0
0
0
0
08a88ad88e34112a
Strange joke? An anonymous editor made this edit a while ago and claims that is was not a joke. Considering the user's talk page, I thought it would be better to direct the user here rather than to discuss the question on our own. -
0
0
0
0
0
0
08a8d4852d922b06
Your are a filthy fuck go fuck your self
1
0
1
0
1
0
08a99ea7b871c4c8
"*The U.S. Marine Band website says ""a time""...not sure where else to go if the U.S. Government doesn't have the information. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08ab0ef6d1ebe413
Blocked Your IP address and, in fact, the entire range of IP addresses owned by Velocity Telephone, Inc. has been blocked. If I ask you a serious question relating to your future on Wikipedia and then you revert it telling me I'm trolling and that I should be blocked, then you don't deserve any sort of editing privileges whatsoever on Wikipedia. This is an encyclopedia, not a soapbox. (Elkspeak)
0
0
0
0
0
0
08abf2ab8b444310
quick question when I look at my watchlist or the history of the page, it looks something like this: Wikipedia:Sandbox‎; 08:54 . . (+15) . . 136.8.5.100 (Talk) My question is what does the (+15) mean? Sometimes it's red (for a negative), or green, (for a positive. All help will be appreciated.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08acc5d9d599b41c
Mark. Your semen is not viable. Were you to procreate, the children would be homosexuals. Do no procreate Mark, enough is enough.
1
0
0
0
0
0
08ad8be453f902fc
" I just got a telegram in the mail...it says......""GWERNOL IS GAY!!!"" Swear to fuck your mom if you swear to tape it."
1
0
1
0
1
1
08aeeea65d4abef0
I agree. I certainly agree that the last 3 paragraphs should be removed as I've argued above. I'm agnostic on the rest but agree that a full re-write should be undertaken by a knowledgable editor.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08af1625e77d31c1
I disagree. The fact that it used to be single party government is largely an irrelvance; the important thing is that it is still a constitutional monarchy, parliamentary system, that allows for both coalitions and majority rule. That hasn't changed, and so to say that because we currently have a coalition, of whatever party, means that the position of Deputy Prime Minister should be included alongside the heads of state and government is false. I am all for mentioning Nick Clegg as Deputy Prime Minister in the article, around the same place David Cameron is currently described as Prime Minister, but to put Clegg alongside the Queen and Prime Minister on the basis of it being a coalition government is not right. Now if the job were constitutionally defined as being the Prime Minister's second-in-command, and if Cameron were to die/resign suddenly Clegg would become Prime Minister, I would completely agree that he should be there, but it isn't. Clegg may be Deputy Prime Minister, but he is not deputy head of government, and so he should not be put alongside the head of state and head of government.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08af5e3dc4c2917c
Giano, I listed the specific issues above repeatedly on request. Irpen has gone beyond reasonable inquiry into the nature of the problem into repetitive pointless badgering.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08af9b4eea83da39
" I am not far right. I am Jewish, not related to Gamergate (it is bizarre and idiotic), and I hate both far right and far left. You are far left, so I hate you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.207.63.200 "
1
0
0
0
0
0
08b2fd506b4b4cdb
" Why repeat myself? It's not my problem if you want to pretend I didn't read it.—Machine Elf 1735 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08b31cbe5a20fdd6
Chadic languages Just a heads up, there are no Chadic languages spoken in Chad. So don't revert the article on Chadic languages.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08b443250d0e53f0
" NPVO is mostly just about the edit left by 66.208.178.67. If someone with some knowledge of this topic would clean it stylistically (""from this fateful day""...shudder) and then take out the snide quips that would help. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08b482b8601e2e01
Your article Andrew Diey has appeared in the Dead End Pages list because it is not wikified. Please consult the Wikipedia Guide to Layout for more information on how to write a good, wikified article. I would encourage you to revisit your submissions and {{wikify}} them. Thanks and happy editing!
0
0
0
0
0
0
08b5136479b5a9d4
}} {{Image requested|in=Collin County, Texas|of=Headquarters, 7100 Corporate Drive Plano, Texas 75024, United States
0
0
0
0
0
0
08b58bdabce2e31c
" Getting what specifically? So far Busby has been right about most things. His detractors are from the Nuclear Industry. He is a recognised expert and not as far to the extreme as you claim WP:HONESTY WP:NOTSCANDAL. I am dismayed why you continue to attack this man especially when your identity is known, this leaves you wide open for proceedings as Busby has apparently started to do. Nuclear and it's radiological effect are now understood, Busby has significantly contributed to ""internal"" emitter debate, this the central argument of second event theory. Modern research has now accepted this damaging form of exposure as it was previously ignored. You could say in fact that Busby was ahead of his time and received much criticism for it. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08b63978fd497179
" Hi Trainheavyduty, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Finding your way around: Table of Contents Department directory Need help? Questions — a guide on where to ask questions. Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes. Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules. How you can help: Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help. Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity. Additional tips... Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your ""signature"" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you. Good luck, and have fun. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08b654555e27e6e3
" Thank you for pointing out that ""Anne of Świdnica"" -wikipedia -wiki has only 10 hits, not 164, as many web pages mirror Wikipedia content, and not all pages acknowledge that. Allowing the further propagation of such OR terms is clearly unacceptable. When looking at Google Scholar ""Anne of Swidnica"" has at least one hit (compared to none for the diacritic version or the Polish name), and that refers to the book Medieval Germany: An Encyclopedia already mentioned above, which on page 110 uses inconsistent naming by two different authors, while elsewhere preferring Schweidnitz. Google Scholar, with 25 hits for ""Anna von Schweidnitz"", shows that this is the proper name used internationally by scholars.   Discuß   "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08b69b0c7087edb4
About me My other accounts are: Tavrian and Bogdan. My name is Maksim Bogdanov, and I live in Slovenia. I play contrabass and bass guitar. I'm a fan of funk and rock music, and Britney Spears ofcourse. I have one sister and a little nephew. Recently, I finally completed four-year music high school, and will hopefully continue my education in music academy of Ljubljana.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08b76b365c686aaf
Taxman and kuru you have absolutly no reason to call that low content ,see your own promoted websites ->superretirementplans.com ,it has absolutly no content quality.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08b7803d8e6e03cf
"Page was once deleted for lack of notability but now it meets at least two of the required criteria: ""the rotation nationally by any major radio network"" and the ""nomination for a major music award"". Thus, I created page again."
0
0
0
0
0
0
08b78c3ede997a30
":I really think we should use "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08b7ca30a84a522b
Because israel confirmed its participation in esc 2011 so this section is no longer neccecery.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08b950d24e5bc02e
And Luke, stay out, son of a bitch!!!!!!!!!!!! ;) 198.228.217.150
1
0
1
0
1
0
08bb114239b4e0be
" Honestly, I don't even remember making those edits in the Orlando Jordan article. However, I was correct for editing out a statement that was not properly sourced. As far as my statement about Kanyon goes, it may have been incorrect, but it's really not a big deal. It's just a discussion page, not the article. Also, you didn't have to write to me in such a disrespectful tone. Finally, learn how to spell. You should have written, ""...you're at the right place to argue with me then,"" not ""your."" Put that in your pipe, and smoke it, asshole. "
0
0
1
0
1
0
08bb6e1b115b0462
I DON'T LIKE ethnics 86.178.49.98
0
0
0
0
0
0
08bb959239dc66bc
"Archive 8: February 2010 - November 2010 The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010 Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010 Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010 Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010 Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010 Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010 Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · = The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010
0
0
0
0
0
0
08bbec0835e7a2a5
...... PPS Aha, found the brothers: 福原信三 (Fukuhara Shinzou) and 福原路草 (Fukuhara Rosou). And easy to find, too, once I encountered 日本写真家事典, of whose existence I hadn't heard till this evening.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08bc259d5dd52ade
did u ever for once think that it was a general remark about truth? did nt u imply i was unreasonable. This is y we must assume Good faith. Does power corrupt, or r some people immune from corruption. Last time i checked we were all human.(save one reptilian admin). if anything it is bad timing. ge wiz, stop diluting the term and save it for the real devils.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08bd5d4700e4ae45
I think if its going to be restructured it should be done as a userpage first because there are quite a few controversial areas |talk
0
0
0
0
0
0
08bd9a138bb65705
" Hey! The draft is properly laid out which is good, we got inline citations and most promotional content have been removed. However the draft needs more reliable sources linking towards the subject. By reviewing the sources, many of them do not mention Language Technology Centre. So finding sources which provide significant coverage on the subject is ideal. Best, GT "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08be056b71d3c82b
If not please rad recommendation here
0
0
0
0
0
0
08bf26b0c35bb562
Sevco Scotland are the club, you'll soon see. Sevco 5088 are the company whos shareholders own Sevco Scotland, which will be the club. Obviously they won't be known as Sevco Scotland, they will be called Rangers FC or Rangers or Rangers Football Club as they own the right to those trade names. They'll also probably re-name themselves something Rangers like for example The Rangers FC Ltd but they are a club(or will be once they get the license.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08bfaa363fbf27b7
" Thanks. That's three of us now, and counting. But you aren't ""abusing"" anything, that is a common, legitimate and meaning of the word. You have correctly identified the problem word, as Timb66 did, something which Greg L still refuses to accept and continues to edit-war about. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08c01731ee8c208d
I really really struggle to cope with users like logan and I don't think he was right
0
0
0
0
0
0
08c0a7aa45ea3f0e
" Dubious claims about clearly non-transgenderd people This article lists a whole bunch of people whos transgender status is clearly wrong and others for whom it is highly speculative. This isn't a list of people who ""kinda, sorta, there's a small chance, maybe"" are transgender. The ones who cross-dressed for some nefarious/deceptive purpose and not as a life style choice clearly can not be classified as transgender and should be removed from the article completely. The fact that mythological figures such as Achilles were even added in the first place says a lot about the POV pushing of the people who supported it. The only mythological one who might be considered transgenderes is Guan Yin. The real life figures who did it to disguise themselves to avoid something (e.g. military service) or even to get into something where women are discriminated against. They did it for deceptive purposes as well, so they can't really be considered transgendered. The pope one is laughable and definitely should be removed. The one about Joan of Arc is based exclusively on an accustion from a unreliable source. If they accused her of being a witch, should we have included her in a list of witches too? Also, I'd like to see an authoritative source showing that she was even accused of it as it seems that it's most Wikipedia ripped sites and LGBT websites that site that as fact. And what are ""transvestite tendencies"" in reference to Ed Wood? You need to start citing sources or I'm just going to start deleting them. That goes mainly for the historical and mythological figurse section. Maxwell Klinger wasn't even a real transvestite, he only did that so he'd get a section 8 and get kicked out of the army. Anyone who watched the show knows he would try all kinds of crazy stuff to get kicked out under the guise of being mentally ill. This phrase describing the character is also very odd: ""Although a transvestite, he loudly denied any charges of homosexuality."" What's the association between the two? Also, it appears they're using a warped definition of transgender here. I've never heard a definition that would automatically include cross-dressers as if that automatically means they identify with the opposite gender rather than just enjoying the clothes. I'm sorry, but this overly broad and incorrect definition of transgender is obviously an attempt just to make the list as long as possible. 28 June 2005 21:00 (UTC)"
0
0
0
0
0
0
08c13bbf0358fc7a
I just have deleted Russian salad myself. Further discussion is welcomed here or on the article's talk page.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08c2992dfc30b854
We may work this quote in later: “The real goal was to seize control of party apparatuses in states that rely on caucuses. With that in hand, Paul’s organization can direct party funds and operations to recruit and support candidates that follow Paul’s platform, and in that way exert some influence on the national Republican Party as well, potentially for years to come” — (Ron Paul wants to influence the Republican Party and America for good.) —
0
0
0
0
0
0
08c2a113354ec432
Ok I've got both leads in the discussion. Please make your case in the discussion why his lead is not good for the article. Thanks.( )
0
0
0
0
0
0
08c33b64522eee75
" The statement is a very broad brush stroke and a generalization. Do any historians make such a statement? It would seem to be the type of statement that would require a reference. If it does not have a reference, is there another way of writing the statement that is supported by a reference? StormRider "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08c3ee408a2a354a
"==Street Gang== Mr. Davis, Thanks for your note on my talk page; I really appreciate it, and it's an honor to receive communication from the author of such an important book. As this article's creator and main editor, I'm sorry that you thought the review section was so negative. Please understand that it was not my intention to present it that way or that I was in any way trying to disparage your book. In my rush to get the article published, I did a google search and those are the reviews I found. Also please understand that this is a Wikipedia article, and the article as it now stands will never be ""complete"". It's a work in progress. I thought an article about Street Gang was important enough to get out there. I am by no means a professional writer, so I'm certain there are all kinds of weaknesses about it, so I depend upon the feedback of other more experienced editors. I would've thought that the other sections of the article demonstrates my respect for you and for your work. I appreciate your feedback, something I always welcome as a Wikipedia editor. If you are aware of other sources that I wasn't able to locate, please send them my way, on my talk page. I'll repeat this message via your webpage, to ensure that you see it. You should also know that I've taken it upon myself to improve all Sesame Street-related articles on Wikipedia. It's a big project, and a great need. For example, Sesame Street, at one point was actually a featured article, but it was recently downgraded for some really good reasons. It's an unfortunate state at the current time. Your book came out shortly after I took on the project, so it's been a boom for me. I thought focusing on the history of the show was a natural place to start, so your book has been a valuable resource. I've already started working on this article: History of Sesame Street, and if you look at the reference section, you'll see that I've used your book extensively. It's also a work in progess, and no where near finished. My goal is that at least this article get up to featured article status by Sesame Street's 40th anniversary in November. I can't tell you how much your book has helped me. On a personal level, I wanted to tell you how much I enjoyed your book. It was a fun read, and immensely interesting. I was brought to tears many times, especially when I realized while reading about all that Joan Cooney and her team did to get the show on the air. See, I'm turning 45 this year, which makes me old enough to be the first audience that watched it. I had to put the book down to compose myself when I realized, ""They did all that for me!"" I appreciate learning about the struggles they all went through to affect my life so profoundly, and now the life of my own children, who are severely developmentally disabled and love the show as much as I did and still do. I believe that Sesame Street deserves high quality articles on Wikipedia, and I've taken it upon myself to help accomplish that. If you, as the ultimate expert, could assist me in that goal, I can't tell you how valuable that would be. Again, thanks for the feedback and communication. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08c4ab44d7e0e7e2
Hahaha you thanked me 😅 I know when someone is being deceptive like you mister......... I know I'm 16 but seriously any need.....
0
0
0
0
0
0
08c71ad93ba5efb1
Here's the link to the deletion review, if you'd like to participate.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08c8147e124f66fb
" Patrick Carnegy and Jill Gomez I see nothing wrong with saying ""his/her partner"". However, in this case I'm not sure whether or not they are married, as some sources say they are. Do you know anything about this? Of course, if they are married, Ms Gomez is now a countess. '''''' (Talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08c82465cda26c7c
This is ridiculous. The user I'm speaking to also said I was being disingenuous. Why don't you ask him to focus on the content as well? I took the initiative to start a discussion with someone who contested the content that I was adding to the article, yet he didn't want me to address him. Then what's the whole point of the talk page in the first place? Who else do I address? This is really getting ridiculous.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08c83ccc3c7c1094
" You wanted the one with the email or the 2nd one?SimonS "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08c86df7de2cd014
Batman No worries about being heavy handed. You don't live on the 'net for this long and not get a thick skin ) I was pissier about it before my coffee, but I see the point. And it was really just a 'Be Bold!' attempt that flopped (I am glad you understood I didn't mean it in bad faith at least, that matters more to me right now). I still think it should be it's own article, since I think the discussion stands on it's own legs, but I cheerfully agree to disagree. (This from the chick who also thinks Nightwing should be renamed 'Dick Grayson', and grumbles about that a lot). Paper games - I had a road race card game as a young'un that seems vaguely similar. It's probably on the other side of the globe, though, along with most of my comics P
0
0
0
0
0
0
08c8aa0818443715
It's not really for us to decide what is a conspiracy theory, but indeed, the article rather confusingly mixes conspiracy claims and factual information about Jewish leaders in the Bolshevik movement. There was a recent newspiece, a quote by Putin: Times of Israel - Putin: First Soviet government was mostly Jewish. Apparently some people feel such quote is conspiracist whereas others say it's just a statement of a statistical fact. In any case, the option is #1, the article shouldn't imply any notion of Jewish participation in the early communist movement is a conspiracy theory. However, I'm not sure if that general topic (Jews in the bolshevik movement) should be covered in detail in this article.'
0
0
0
0
0
0
08c9725364d9e1e3
Wow... Someone sure is aggressive...XP
0
0
0
0
0
0
08c99e24999eb5c7
" You claim, yet again, that the text ""For example India-based iYogi was reported by InfoWorld to use scare tactics and install undesirable software"" is not supported by the sources. This is incorrect, as BOTH sources support BOTH these assertions. ""Brian Krebs, a former Washington Post writer who now operates his own blog, Krebs on Security, tested iYogi himself and discovered that the company was indeed using scare tactics to coerce users into signing up. [...] then immediately went into my control panel and deleted what [iYogi] put on my computer [...]"" and ""[...] iYogi was using support calls to aggressively sell annual subscriptions [...] proceeded to install an iYogi ""tune up"" tool called PCDiagnostics"". It took less than 30 seconds to find this information in the sources provided. And yes, it is absolutely appropriate to include sourced information in Wikipedia articles even if it happens to be negative for a certain company. '''' contributions talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08c9b28b32622dd3
Jung And Einstein In 1895 Albert Einstein was a pupil at cantonal school in Aarau, Switzerland. In 1896, after school in Switzerland, Einstein renounced his German citizenship. Carl P. Jung was born in in the Swiss canton (or county) of Thurgau. While Jung worked on Wandlungen und Symbole der Libido (Psychology of the Unconscious), tensions grew between Freud and Jung. Frank P. Geyer continued to serve as a detective until August 15, 1903 when he resigned. He had been transferred to the 18th Police District in the United States. Detective Geyer had arrested James Anderson; whether this is the same Anderson mentioned in Detective Geyer's 1896 work is non-determinable. In 1912 tensions between the two psychologists came to a peak. In 1901-02 Albert Einstein acquired Swiss citizenship and completed a scientific paper, obtaining a teaching position at school in Schaffhausen, Switzerland. The FBI file on Einstein came to light in 1983 when Robert Alan Schwartz wrote an article on the subject for The Nation magazine. Between J. Edgar Hoover and John Hutchison, democratic rights didn’t stop with McCarthy’s downfall nor with the demise of so-called notorious J. Edgar Hoover. Yet for years, zero-point energy according to Hutchison is obtained from the quantum vacuum. Hutchison claims on scientific phenomena are regularly featured and discussed by various media coverage. John Hutchison's claims of inventions and discoveries of a variety of phenomena are, like, NASA. The FBI should do an article on NASA and their non-determinable webers. I do not find it too surprising Schwartz once more wrote about not only Frank Geyer, but Albert Einstein with not too much said about Carl P. Jung during these years around the turn of the centennial.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08cb6364a31ea3b4
" Msa Garratts Hi, The idea about an article is a good one, but unfortunately you've started out with an error. That is understandable as the subject is complex. The WAGR first imported the M class Garratts, in 1911. These are very important locos, because they are the third class of Garratt to be built, and the first ""main line"" Garratt, showing the potential as a heavy freight hauler. They were followed up in 1912 by the Ms class, only difference being the Ms class were superheated. So they were also the first class of Garratts to be the subject of a repeat order. Both classes were built by Beyer-Peacock. The Msa class were constructed in 1930 by the WAGR in their own workshops. Apparently a copy of the Ms class, they did seem to have some cosmetic differences. The story does not end there, but moves to Victoria. The VR G class apparently is copied from the Ms class, the major difference is the frames moved outside so as to accomidate the reduced gauge. Outside framed Garratts are very rare, even in the smaller gauges. But wait there is more (no, not steak knives!). The design was used again, for the Australian Portland Cement's 3'6"" line near Geelong, the first loco being supplied in 1936 and the second in 1939. The boiler from one of these locos is used on the restored G42. So in conclusion the design was constructed over a period of 28 years, used on three railway, on two gauges and built by two manufacturers, with, if I've added it up correctly, 27 locos constructed. Personally I think the article should cover the history of the design, and include all the varients. Some work would be required to hunt down variations, though. So yes, I think it does deserve an article. Please feel free to use the above if you wish. Cheers, Michael."
0
0
0
0
0
0
08cbfdee7aafbac9
Please pardon me if it's a stupid question, as I haven't really done a lot of work with categories in the past. But does that sort of change really need a CfD? I think that if I had found myself with a similar sub-cat idea, I would have just gone ahead and done it or, more likely, thrown it at a relevant project talk page to see if there were objections. Of course, maybe you weren't able to get consensus at the project, hence the post to CfD. Again, sorry if this seems stupid — as I branch out into new and different tasks, I just like to understand the thinking of people who are engaged with them more regularly. I find it helps me with my own decision-making.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08cc77bae2f8513a
" I made the account ""Iamnotsteve"" yesterday. IamnotSteve"
0
0
0
0
0
0
08cd75b10ae2471a
AFAIK, they're as separate from the Pound Sterling as the Faroese krona is from the Danish krone... I agree about the Isle of Man pound, though. ✉
0
0
0
0
0
0
08cf43f30c7923c0
Anyone else remember Dime talking about Blues Saraceno as a major influence? Abbott mentioned this in a Guitar for the Practicing Musician article circa 1995. It seems like this should be included in musical influencesDime wore a plaid patch tattoo in honor of the guy.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08cf59ea23aae199
Note Thanks for the note. I don't use socks in the sense that you should be concerned with. See WP:SOCKS#Legitimate uses.- ( | t | e)
0
0
0
0
0
0
08cfa8ef3d28b23e
Merge with European Somebody proposed a merger with European - I support the proposal. 94.192.38.247
0
0
0
0
0
0
08d00271ffc7d44f
Freeland, PA You are really, really gay for reverting my good edit to Freeland, PA. Stupid liberals! 204.186.77.109 tilde tilde tilde tilde
1
0
0
0
1
0
08d191b67b873a4c
IRS notice Hello there, this is the IRS. You owe us $19,000 in unpaid taxes. Kristina Gonzalez, Inland Revenue Service http://www.irs.gov. 2602:FFEA:1:131:0:0:0:D348
0
0
0
0
0
0
08d2aa6b26e2ea22
" This man deserves another shot at becoming a federal judge given all his hard work since coming to America. Those dirty Democrats had no right to gripe about John Roberts and Sam Alito being two more white guys after what they did to this man. I remember reading some complaints by those dirty Democrats and liberal Latino voters about Bush failing nominating a Hispanic to the Supreme Court, and I thought to myself, ""Well, what the hell about Miguel Estrada, you schmucks?"" The man received a unanimous well-qualified rating from the American Bar Association, and yet the Democrats filibustered him. They claim he didn't provide enough information about his views, but I think what really bothered them was the fact that he is a conservative Hispanic. This just goes to show you what those dirty Democrats really are whenever blacks and Hispanics step out of line by espousing conservatism."
0
0
0
0
0
0
08d30c9da3a63600
user talk: Grizzlybear82 Please don't add crap to my talk page again. I don't remember asking for your opinion.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08d3ab339f4c803f
WHY DID YOU DELETE AFROJACK? With the afros and the jackos and the ha ha ha.
1
0
0
0
0
0
08d6300120667267
The defeat of Roydosan Well done my fellow Greeks, we have defeated Roydosan and now he runs like cattle. HEIL!
1
0
0
0
0
0
08d69d8e7f60aada
Tree topology Grouping aplacophora and polyplocophora into crown group molluscs makes no change to the position of the Halkierids; the topology is not changed as there is no branching order given.  ( – Talk)
0
0
0
0
0
0
08d75421dc5c9f3a
can be done through excessive masturbation)
0
0
0
0
0
0
08d7762021da79cc
" ""Legal Troubles"" Getting arrested at a peaceful protest once hardly qualifies as a ""legal trouble,"" let alone ""legal troubles."" 24.34.94.110 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08d818efcc68caba
You just now made a bunch of reversions. Fuck
1
0
1
0
0
0
08d9429a900e9f0f
" Hey! Maybe you should try it. Your candidate's ""spiritual mentor"" is a Jew-hating, faux-""Christian"" Black supremacist. "
1
0
0
0
1
0
08db409bce3552cd
" Note that this was not disruption but was a genuine vote. A separate account was created for this, as the proposer seemed to have done the same. It was a little joke, you see. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08dcb9f639df845f
I think so. Good luck. ;)
0
0
0
0
0
0
08dcc424d3b0bf7e
JUstin likes it in the behind..
1
0
0
0
0
0
08dd9505eff5a42a
Well I, for one, really like the new intro. Still reading the rest.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08dda5dc4a8d980e
Great this is interesting. We formed our own geneologies during the British Raj did we Singhs? We dont have a reference by any source during 'any' rule referencing our royal ancestry? Hmm... how about this link BY AN INDEPENDENT MOHYAL SITE which makes reference to e.g.my own ancestor Raja Mal becoming a Muslim and his ancestors, Raja Dhrupet being exiled from ruling the Mathura state and asserting his geneology of being a son of Janamejaya (for those Singhs who didnt know, Janamejaya who was the great grandson of Arjun Panda, the hero who famously defeated and shamed the opposing Duryodhan's army in the Mahabharat, tahts who ) ) (http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:uDsCFRzZmBcJ:www.mohyal.com/gms/m_member.htm+raja+mal+janamejaya&hl;=en&client;=firefox-a) It is the 14th paragraph I believe. And that is from an independent source recording it's own historical references which has no interest in any particular anti or pro agendas as much as here at the moment. I apologise for disproving you guys here, but it is a quest for the truth afterall right? ) Dab, You have A LOT of patience for keeping with this article so far and thank you for being open minded and dedicated enough to see past the rhetoric and abuse here. Some of us here do appreciate your efforts, whatever the outcome.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08de01156642c810
Jehochman you say you love the project. I wonder if you realize that the project would benefit from having more editors as 28bytes and less users as Jehochman? So,Jehochman, for the sake of the project you claim to love please leave it alone.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08de162b76e6f3d6
" Leaving messages for other users Hello TheEuphoricSir, welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you left what looked like a ""thank you"" message on the page (Did I mess up?) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08de77ea3a9a65d8
" Controversy: Your point here is well taken but for the fact a person can be well aware of possible distinctions in terminology and still call a magazine a clip. In actuality, it is the ""firearm experts"" that insist on a controversy by way of insisting on their terminology. In other words, because they have taken issue with the layman's wording they have indeed made it controversial and not the other way around. So while the distinction in wording may not be controversial within their circle of buddies they are in fact responsible for the controversy. M-W Dictionary: When I say ""the dictionary"" clearly I'm referring to ""the dictionary"" I cited before in this case M-W. I am a ""cognitive miser"" like anyone that takes short cuts when I can, just as you shortened it to M-W. Rather than grasp at straws in dissecting ones arguments let us focus on the big picture when we know what each other means. I agree the dictionary isn't for giving an exhaustive description, that's what encyclopedias are for. However in this instance it does shed some light on ""the controversy"" as it does indeed define a clip as also a magazine. The reason for including it is not to give people a better understanding of the differences between types of clips or the different types of magazines. The purpose of including it is to show the other side of the controversy and according to my research within Wikipedia this is entirely acceptable. Agreement: Clearly some people don't agree with M-W just as you and I don't agree with SAAMI's statement that people sometimes refer to ""cartridge clips"" as ""magazines"". The ""experts"" on weapon's have this fact somewhat backwards and are incorrect as they should state that people refer to ""magazines"" as ""clips"". Just because you and I disagree with SAAMI's statement doesn't mean it should be taken out as a reference and I'd never suggest that. What I suggest is a compromise. I agree with you about the references regarding Remington and Marlin as that does seem to fall under OR. M-W however doesn't fall under OR as it is a published source and being a leader in its industry it could be argued is the authority on word use. Do you have any suggestions on how it could be incorporated so as to show how this controversy is perpetuated? Without saying it's wrong because it clearly isn't according to common usage. I'm thinking something like this....Clip technically defined.....use to describe magazine is controversial....however M-W defines it as such. This allows readers to see their is a difference in terms, there is a controversy, and why it potentially exists or is perpetuated. I think this is fair. Note well that I never attempted to remove any sources that backed up what you're saying here. I'm not interested in destroying your view, only presenting both sides fairly. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08de8bb29c45baeb
Support. If Standard Chinese is indeed the most common English name, which the opposers even seem to acknowledge, then rename it per policy. For titles, Wikipedia is meant to reflect common names or what reliable sources largely say. If the name seems unfair or POV, then it's not Wikipedia that's unfair or POV, it's just the way academic zeitgeist is - it's not up to us to 'correct' it.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08deb5c9a2bf2688
":Constitution of May 3rd is an idiosyncratic construct understood by Poles - this is not true. ""Constitution of May 3rd"" is used at least in US and probably in other English speaking countries. English language source bare this usage out. See below. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08df4b8b934b7050
For the record, I believe that QG is the last person that needs a condescending lecture like that !! - (resonate)
0
0
0
0
0
0
08df69ffaccbc2b8
The wikiality of the elephant population. Yes! I heard that somewhere. Soon it will be true! Unless you unleash the almighty power of the STOP! hand. lol.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08e02f9bc9abe2bf
Name change It should be noted that EAN.UCC (and the vast majority of it's member organisations around the world) changed it's name to GS1 during the first few months of 2005. The global organisation is now called GS1 and the national MOs are style as GS1 Country Name (GS1 UK, GS1 US, GS1 France, etc.)You will see this reflected in the EAN.UCC website. (
0
0
0
0
0
0
08e12b109d332042
No violation? copied the almost same comment from AN3 and added some for getting a quick response. With all due respect, I think it is a clear violation on 3RR and civility. According to Wikipedia:Three-revert rule, An editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, on a single page within a 24-hour period. A revert means undoing the actions of another editor, whether involving the same or different material each time. Moreover, I'm getting a threat by the editor. Why is he free of any sanction?
0
0
0
0
0
0
08e2e3bba760f156
" resentment ""In France, the perceived preference of the British Navy for evacuating British forces at the expense of the French led to some bitter resentment"" are you sure about that? the article states the BBC said they have waited until the very last man, so it means everyone was rescued. the French article states the French resentment vis-à-vis the BEF came from Gort's refusal to launch a ""traditional counter-attack"" as planned by French commander General Weygand. Gort wanted an evac as he claimed it was inevitable in the medium-term. the british chief of staff supported Gort and the british operation was launched instead of the french plan. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08e43d9ab0549e98
" Comments Why the club name have Praia name? it near to the beach or related to Cape Vedre capital? tc "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08e49c7a24b9e94e
" It says in the AIV header that warnings must be recent (bolded). IP was last warned 20 days ago (sorry, I know I put 11, I miscounted). 20 days isn't recent, so yes, in theory your logic statement is correct. IPs are used by several different people so it would be unfair to penalise them all. Besides, this wasn't even blatant vandalism, if vandalism at all. Maybe an errant test edit, but anyway enough to merit a level 1 warning in any case. If you look through the archives at WPT:AIV, you may find a thread on what ""recent"" means – there have been several in the past. – B.hotep •talk• "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08e4aa0f3f188107
" That's all interesting stuff. Surely it's been considered by the media, pundits, academics? (Re: inserting the info into the article.) Cheers Imperatrix Mundi "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08e4e67b838c8b87
" DRN listing I've reverted your restoration of the Azerbaijan map case because I now see that it became archived because it was not properly filed in the first place. Cases must be filed through the DRN request form, not manually, or our archive bot will constantly remove them from the page. Moreover, now that it has been off the main page for some time, other users need to be re-notified and I also note that other editors have joined in at the article talk page who were not listed before. All in all, it needs to be relisted via the request form if it's going to go back up at DRN. Regards, (TALK) (DRN coordinator)"
0
0
0
0
0
0
08e4e715353ff73c
That was the obligatory warning.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08e511bb4b45d5d5
}} and his many, many socks
0
0
0
0
0
0
08e529767d0dca87
" When did the war start? The lead says it started 20 March 2003 but later in the article it says ""At 9:34 PM EST (5:34 AM Baghdad time) on March 19, 2003 the Iraq Invasion began."" with a citation of the GlobalSecurity website (the actual webpage is here). Then, later in the same section, it goes back to ""In the invasion phase of the war (March 20-April 30)"". Which one goes and which one stays? Is there a reason to doubt the GlobalSecurity site? I'm hearing a lot about today being the anniversary of the invasion and then I check here and it says the 20th, what should we do? "
0
0
0
0
0
0