tasksource/jigsaw_toxicity · Datasets at Hugging Face

id stringlengths 16 16	comment_text stringlengths 6 5k	toxic int64 0 1	obscene int64 0 1	insult int64 0 1	identity_hate int64 0 1
05aebb34275b8c4d	It´s blatantly obvious that the only reason why you keep removing this is because you don´t think that Marxist-Leninists are socialists.	0	0	0	0
05aed727911f0f2d	I agree with you, corollary is the word to be used in english. (Lina.lasse)	0	0	0	0
05af49538959fa9e	" List of Boston Bruins head coaches Okay - one more up! Feel free to review. Thanks, « Cøøkie''' "	0	0	0	0
05af610a0a220de7	The least security sign out of your user interface Computer security worker or not, if someone else is using your private computer, particularly if it is someone like dragon, whom you don't know very well, simply log out of your user interface account and have them always use a guest account.	0	0	0	0
05aff915f17379c4	Now that I take a look, I see that the article on John Yoo, who you saw fit to include when re-creating the Rebuttal section as the more enthusiastically titled Support section, also has the controversial nature of his torture-cheerleading memos mentioned right there at the top above the Contents box. FYI.	0	0	0	0
05b03cf98d498f39	I agree with User:Abcedare, the agenda of this user is to sully an absent editor's name & another's reputation by misrepresentation. Nothing in the genuine interest of Wikipedia will come about from this reader's editting.	0	0	0	0
05b07d91eb069a4d	Allow me , award this Epic Barnstar for your great success in redesigning Joseph Stalin articles and its subpages. Thanks a lot, it is much better now ]]	0	0	0	0
05b287f68a12e345	You're missing all the fun	0	0	0	0
05b29420e61ec898	" I assumed you probably weren't, but I'm glad to hear it for sure anyway. I understand. Feel free to stop by anytime. Best regards mate, (talk) "	0	0	0	0
05b3eb232d210fca	Cheers. Your amendment clears it up nicely 23:59, Dec 3, 2003 (UTC)	0	0	0	0
05b42b08035d745e	]]. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.	0	0	0	0
05b4d50a9b6ea480	Someone call a mod, as Hrafn is clearly just mucking around. First he claimed Alfonso was not in Hales, when in fact he is referenced on page 211, a page just after 210. Secondly the work Worship of Augustus Caesar mentions Panvinio (Panvinus), and in fact even references Hales p.211.	0	0	0	0
05b6df1d5188d5f1	Do you know what you're sooooo right, You've just hit the nail of the fecking head there, you really have and have made my day in the process –) —	0	0	0	0
05b849129c6307aa	Personally, I would create articles if there were any topics that I liked to create. Also, as to expanding articles, I would be happy to, but almost all of the information that I have to add has already been added by someone else. Cheers,	0	0	0	0
05b9130fbda1c206	This entry was deleted by its author, owing to the fact that it contains research which is being distorted somewhat. Since it's a part of an ongoing research piece by a working journalist, I've decided that any distorition to the research could be problematic. Thus, the simplest thing to do in order to avoid antagonizations, distortions, etc, is to remove it. Since you have decided to continue this antagonization, I am left with no alternative but to report you to those in a place of authority at Wikipedia. Of course, you may feel free to complete and post your own research on the Havana shipyards however, I've decided the best course of action is to register the copyright on all pertinent research statements and images associated with this article. Use of any of the above by persons other than the author, without his permission, is in violation of international copyright standards and will be promplty reported to the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) and all other pertinent authorities.	0	0	0	0
05b93eb05e5700fb	" Re:Meetup thread Well, ""COI"" can be a pretty harsh word on Wikipedia, and your misconception of ""David Shankbone"" as a real name probably sounded more like bitter irony. And sometimes people tend to get hotter in conversation than they intend. Online communication can be difficult, and there is a reason why human beings have faces. "	0	0	0	0
05ba6ba405ec20f5	For how long did they block your Fab Four nickname? M.V.E.i.	0	0	0	0
05ba8dba0fe74063	It is also crystal clear to notice, only federer has these so called fake achievements page about his shitting n even pissing, when players like Nadal Sampras who had way more better records dont have it? Its because this page was trolled by fans of federer over and over and they added almost every non existent things as records- a total lie to wikipedia viewers.	0	0	0	0
05bb2bf6d6fe1bd4	Found the scientific name. Ⓣ	0	0	0	0
05bb5cfecdf4b5a1	We have over 400 people who are willing to use their real names, and that's before we've gone public and before any serious recruitment efforts. So I'm not worried.	0	0	0	0
05bb7ce92287b3c6	Bolonium: No offense but accept the reality and the reality is an independent Kosova.	0	0	0	0
05bb95ca51204370	I think that the infobox should at least have a picture of Muhammad, if there is to be one anywhere. The image for the page on Muhammad should be a depiction of Muhammad. Having calligraphy or symbolism replace an actual picture would not be in the spirit of wikipedia. Regrettably, it will offend some people, but that is not, nor should be, the impetus behind any decision. A picture of Muhammad would be more encyclopedic and offer more knowledge, therefore, it is the only real option if this is to remain a truly neutral place to obtain knowledge. Also, I feel like there is an overabundance of images in this article. Lots of images of redundant or mildly irrelevant things, as if people are unconsciously putting in different images because they feel bad about putting in an image of Muhammad.	0	0	0	0
05bbbe44f6bbda8f	You're welcome. Some of my work was also quoted in the Ambrose book, but they were all correctly acknowledged and footnoted and thus not among the errors and corrections noted in the researchers' paper.	0	0	0	0
05bced9214593533	Thank you! I took an extended Wiki-break recently, so it's very nice to receive a new barnstar so soon after my return. Best wishes,	0	0	0	0
05bde2e257e74eca	The only thing you are persistant at you ugly bastard is fucking the TROLL'''	1	1	1	0
05beafaff2055045	"*I only have one source that even says he was in in track and fied. In any case, I changed it to ""played track and field."" ~'''' (talk/contribs/editor review)~ "	0	0	0	0
05c00892d91aafba	I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. I asked how much of our language was replaced with words from French and Italian. Are you saying that our language was replaced by 70-80 percent with French and Italian words? I'm guessing there is a misunderstanding here, but yes, please can a script to find out. Do anything you can. We should know these figures.	0	0	0	0
05c03c60cfc24476	REDIRECT Talk:The Bear (1998 film)	0	0	0	0
05c12dd7c265e22d	He was not a hacker He was not a hacker, the correct term is called a cracker.	0	0	0	0
05c1f66548965da9	" Unapproved bot. You appear to be using your content as a bot, in violation of WP:BOT. Please, stop using your main account as a bot until it is approved. If your bot is approved, please make sure it is flagged as a bot and listed on Wikipedia:Bots/Status. ☯ "	0	0	0	0
05c24874add93682	Why is it that there have been about FIVE DIFFERENT EDITORS change the elimination chart, but the same person always changes it back. Does that sound like a consensus? 76.107.17.32	0	0	0	0
05c3a1aaed7932ba	You find that uncivil? Seriously???? I just re-read it in the light of your comments, and I still don't find it the least bit uncivil. It's an honest assessment of his actions. Maybe he would prefer not to hear it, but the intention was to help him improve as an admin. Please think a bit more kindly about me. Nobody has ever accused me of incivility before.	0	0	0	0
05c4f931b053d397	" Hm. I'll ask someone who would know when they're on. "	0	0	0	0
05c5392db862c291	" If you were to go to the slide that defines ""Genetic Drift"" at baen.tamu.edu/users/cengler/biology/notes/chapt16.ppt you would read: ""Genetic drift is a change in allele frequency due to random variation in fecundity and mortality in a population."" This seems to be exactly the point I was trying to make in the text that provoked the charge of inaccuracy. Would the accuser please clarify? 21:09 19 May 2003 (UTC)"	0	0	0	0
05c547ffc4a0a78e	user zora, i have no interest in hearing what user moshe has to say, the best way to deal with people like her is to ignore them. Now once again you have reverted eminent to distinguished even after agreement. Because of this, like i said before there is no more discussion here, we already came to an agreement, and the word eminent stays, if bridesmill and moshe don't like that that's their problem. Furthermore moshe i have repeatedly asked you to cooperate, again i have no hate for you and do not want to engage in a war here, but i will not let you vandalize it either. like we talk about it before why can't you just be like the russian-jewish sweet girl i had? lol:), same goes for bridesmill ).	0	0	0	0
05c5934907a2d7c0	That makes it so much easier. I didn't know I was allowed to do that. Thanks!	0	0	0	0
05c69b5996aa5557	" Colorado balloon incident Greetings. I reverted your addition of a news photograph of the Colorado balloon incident balloon. Unfortunately, Wikipedia's use is exactly like the commercial use for commercial news photography. As the template you used states: ""Use of historic images from press agencies must only be used in a transformative nature, when the image itself is the subject of commentary rather than the event it depicts"". It's intended for images which are themselves iconic works of art so that we can use the images to primarily facilitate discussion of the image. Even ignoring the legal problems with using the news photography: Wikipedia has a hard requirement for freely licensed images because non-free media compromises the freely licensed status of Wikipedia. Refer to the first rule at WP:NFCC; non-free images are not to be used unless obtaining a freely licensed could not be reasonably believed to be possible. There were undoubtedly thousands of photographs of this balloon taken by amateurs and professionals alike, almost any would do for the purposes of the article. Wikinews claims that the balloon was low-flying and that photographs were captured by area residents. The best way to get an image for the article would be to leave a placeholder in the article requesting that the public submit one. The effectiveness of such a place holder will probably diminish over time as the attention on this incident dies down. I've been checking flickr and other photo sites but have so far come up dry, though sometimes it takes a little while for people to bother uploading their photographs. I hope I haven't given the impression that I do not appropriate your contributions to the article— as I do, especially your efforts to use even and neutral language in the face of a media environment eager to describe the parties unfavourably. Thanks for your contributions! "	0	0	0	0
05c6ca0daefe69ba	" This is A Potentially Ridiculous Article Seriously, it is a potentially ridiculous article, and mislead readers to comprehend the word ""x86"", for the following reasons: 1. Should sort AMD64 or Intel64 implementations as x86? Generally ""x86"" was used to point all the processors compatible with IA-32 ISA, might or might name themselves with ""86"", such as Cyrix 5x86, Intel Pentium 4 and so on. AMD64's long mode is devised by AMD rather than Intel, so how can one sort them together. Nowadays software labeled themselves as ""x86"" are IA-32 compatible software, and use ""x64"" or ""x86-64"" differentiating with it. So this article confuses reader getting in touch with this word. 2. Generations? What is the 8th generation x86 processor? Who invented this kinda processors? AMD K8 just says that it succeeds AMD K7 rather than saying it is the 8th x86 processor, and I've never heard Intel call their x86 processors exceeding the 7th generation. And one thing should never be denied, the first generation of Itanium processor says its family model number as 7, which might potentially imply that Itanium might be the 7th x86 processor succeeding Pentium III, but none confirmed this. So take turn back the Transmeta's Crusoe and Efficeon, if the morph firmed on the system board implements x86 decoder call themselves as x86 processors, then if put the same processor on another board implementing PowerPC decoder, then it would be the PowerPC processor? At this situation, what kind of processor is it? Ridiculous! What's more for what sort it as the 7th/8th generation x86? Who is another Jane Austen, making up another Northanger Abbey? 3. ""x86"" is one architecture(ISA) name? What such a ridiculous thing that I've ever heard on earth! ""x86"" is used to referring the processor, a kind or series of processors rather than an architecture. If it were the name of an architecture, then in this logic way, Intel 80486 is one of the ""implementation"" of this ""architecture""? "	0	0	0	0
05c73c6c6434cf7c	WTF? Banned? Some person in a fourm said it is banned in Syria do to the closeness of the names Al-Asad and Al-Assad. The correct form is Al Asad in the game. I said he was wrong and he went crazy saying some dumb stuff that I was stupid. Who is right, cause I could find No Source that confirmed his statement that this game is banned in Syria. Asad and Assad are very common middle eastern names anyway 72.138.216.89	1	0	0	0
05c7b99e5b754c4c	Amcom article Hi Earlier today I noticed that there is no article on Amcom, and I posted on the Amnet talk page, before moving it to talk:Amcom (because although the network is called Amnet, the actual company is called Amcom). I didn't realize until later that there was already an Amcom (actually Amnet) page that had been deleted. After reading the explanation for the deletion, I'm not sure whether Amcom really has enough notability or not. However, if we do want to make an Amcom page we will have to supply some secondary sources to justify the company's notability. If you are still interested, take a look at this article I found: If you want to reply to me, make sure you either reply on my talk page, or leave a note there saying that you have replied elsewhere. Otherwise, I won't know that you've replied. Welcome and good luck! -	0	0	0	0
05c81f5a2b399354	Nathan Hamilton Thanks for your assistance here. (talk)	0	0	0	0
05c94f71d373b23a	No problem. I didn't even recognize the misspelling myself. All you have to do is copy the content you're interested in from one article and add it the correct article. Then redirect the misspelled one (see Wikipedia:Redirect). Alternately, to delete an article in which you are the sole editor add (see Wikipedia:Speedy deletion) to it and an administrator will delete it. (Edgar181)	0	0	0	0
05c964eb1d12da67	" Scorched earth. If I'm wrong, I apologize, but your current behavior isn't helping you any. Rocco is big on erasing embarrassing things from his talk page and now you're doing the same. Even if you're not also a sock of Belchfire, this is not very collegial of you. Listen, MilesMoney. It is your right to accuse me of being a sock of ""belchfire"" or ""rocco"". That is your right. Of course, you are wrong, but that is not surprising because you are wrong about so many different things. Also, I have right to remove each and every thing written on my talk page. I will continue to do that, especially since many, many of the things written there are just flat out lies. For example, you have stated that I am a sock of ""belchfire"" and I am a sock of ""rocco"". These statements are bald faced lies. I don't have to let you keep those lies on my talk page. I tell you what you go fight your PROV-tainted fights with ""belchfire"" and ""rocco"", but leave me alone. I have no idea what those fights are about, but I do know that you are always full convinced that your point of view must be adopted by all of the other editors. I also know that you have a history of not working cooperatively with others. These are facts. Now, go and get back to your POV pushing and stay off my talk page, unless you have something constructive to discuss concerning an article that I am actually editing. "	0	0	0	0
05ca1ec519e6efb0	fuck you Muthafucka , you jerk you scum lowlife loser !! hehe hahah188.23.179.183	1	1	1	0
05ca53f49434e9aa	Bob Lynch (comics) That article is created by Bob Lynch himself, which is a clear violation of Wikipedia policies. Also, no, the proposed deletion has not been declined. Is Bob Lynch your friend? The image that you deleted is that of Bob Lynch himself, so it has a direct relation to the article that should be deleted anyhow.	0	0	0	0
05ca6a6ec2418af6	Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Jackie Robinson Just to notify you.	0	0	0	0
05cba91c47dde423	See WT:MEDRS#Acupuncture_source. Have also explained the issue clearly at (POV-pushing • )	0	0	0	0
05cbfb6e5a064ab0	wow could you be more vague (82.28.237.200 )	0	0	0	0
05ccd99eecaf5cdf	" Aug 10 2010 Death Hoax currently underway Ebaumsworld is currently trying to get ""Oprah Winfrey Dead at 56"" to the top of Google Trends. Monitor article closely."	0	0	0	0
05cd3f74b3b96c91	Hapsford Please cite sources for this article. Otherwise, it may be tagged as a candidate for deletion in the near future. Cheers. ++	0	0	0	0
05ce5ada155ccee6	" Well, it's been quite some time since I last saw PAL seat maps. I wonder if they'll retain the arrangement in the refurbished cabin? "	0	0	0	0
05ceb52df5035d34	REDIRECT Talk:Ron Link (singer)	0	0	0	0
05d01e1b6aa405d5	Stop harrassing users as you have on User talk:WWGB. You've ignored my repeated warnings and are asking to be banned.	0	0	0	0
05d226bbde012644	Now you too, as in previous issues, present me as the guilty one. I refuse this status, I don't see reasons. What should I understand: that he has the right to intimidate me and if I say that the allegations are not true, I am still the guilty one? He presented them as Romani those who organized the Rajput -> Romani theory.	0	0	0	0
05d2bc5c9264fb4f	Look you little cocksucker. I did nothing wrong. I am sick of your bullshit harassment and you are really starting to piss me off you little pussy. I am doing nothing wrong so just swallow your pride (I know it's hard for you) and admit you lost this fight. Now piss off! Blackeyedfool12	1	1	1	0
05d4383a1d06abac	Man... what's your source?	0	0	0	0
05d43dda7784c665	" I will also try to be less bitey in the future.— dαlus Contribs "	0	0	0	0
05d585bdfaf477be	Thank you For being vigilant in your mission to prevent people from laughing. We wouldn't want anyone to forget how serious this place is and how important you all are. In glumness and constipation, I remain your faithful editor.	0	0	0	0
05d599de3eea648b	re: Quadminton Apologies for deleting the 'article delete' box! S I thought that that was the way to make my democratic feelings known - but obviously not! Thanks for the helpful tone of your message - I'll try not to screw up next time! RM	0	0	0	0
05d64672770cf199	" I agree to that. many parts of the article is apparently biased, made-up bs. Examples following Downfall: ""It was common knowledge that de Molay planned on corrupting Catherine of Valois' male children by tending to their sorrows, then by engaging in acts of anal rape."" ""Philip knew the dangers that de Molay represented; his own sons were nearly sexually molested by de Molay. Upon escaping the vile pervert, they confessed to Philip what de Molay had tried to do."" Myths: ""It is said that Jacques de Molay cursed Philippe le Bel and his descent from his execution pyre, a curse which was responded to by Philip shouting in defiance ""Fuck de Molay!"""" ""It has been speculated that several of the boys whom de Molay had corrupted had grown to enjoy the perversions of the homosexual lifestyle introduced to them"" Legacy: ""Members are encouraged to model their conduct after his example of loyalty and fidelity instead of the homosexual perversions that de Molay was guilty of himself."" ... ""vile pervert"", ""homosexual perversions"", sheesh... Could someone SANE please clean up this article? "	1	0	0	0
05d7f58055c46e54	Scott, I apologize, but you are writing way too much for me to respond coherently. If you would like to email me (see	0	0	0	0
05dbe7a437525101	No, you are the racist, you goddamn neo-Nazi YOU BIG BOY	1	1	1	1
05dc2045c8500f31	Something suspicious about the Durrani Empire article Hello Kansas Bear, I think there is something suspicious going on in the Durrani Empire page. I would like to have your opinion on it.	0	0	0	0
05dc45286840261f	Do you even know what feminism is?	0	0	0	0
05dc64ac8fbc5486	" Reality check: Montevideo does not require relations with foreign states. It merely requires the ""capacity"" to enter into relations with foreign states. - "	0	0	0	0
05dc8e8734b3dcd5	Heh. It's no more reaching than your assumption that they wouldn't have watched the Obama speech on a different channel if it hadn't aired on the one they watched it on. I was just pointing out the fallacy of your assumption that simply because they watched it on Telemundo or Univision that they would not have watched it on a different channel. (rants)	0	0	0	0
05dd1d52520295a7	Please do not vandalise Wikipedia. You will find Wikipedia:Why Wikipedia is so great and Wikipedia:Replies to common objections informative. 02:17, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)	0	0	0	0
05de4f58dd4ff2b5	It's .gba, a special filetype created for it, mainly.	0	0	0	0
05deec00d640ca08	I'll extend the hold time.	0	0	0	0
05e0dc751b1ab359	Dunmanway title change Rockpocket - it appears impossible to return to the old title of Dunmanway Massacre which Sarah777 seems to have changed on 28 October and then had protected in some way. I am not clear on this one not knowing the rules well enough. Is that the case and how would one return to the old title?	0	0	0	0
05e1f7b3ec3e9e2f	== good grief. can you read? why don't you try examining the substance of the links? I am sick and tired of children ranting without reading. ~~	1	0	0	0
05e2006bb43727ad	=Revelvant? Is this page on 9/11 CT's really relevant. Its like saying the Moon is made from Cheese, or like taking David Icke seriously. It just plays into the hands of the idiots that come up with these theories, who at the end of the day are/ were trying to get to get 15 minutes of fame on the backs of the victims of 9/11.	0	0	0	0
05e2a29e780a64de	" ""WP:Null edits always make me laugh - in French, a ""nul"" is a ""dummy""... so in French, instead of ""Microsoft Access for Dummies"" you have ""Microsoft Access pour les nuls"" (talk→ ←track) "	0	0	0	0
05e4b5b26a114183	" Bong said Zebedee said , you did , ""there was a magnitude of difference"" , now you say you did not , he said I may consider reporting him/her , now you say ""feel free to report me as BSZ suggests"" . did BSZ suggest I report him/her , or did BSZ suggest I report you ,or are you saying that BSZ said report him/her but actually mean report you . Its really confusing . "	0	0	0	0
05e513532c8fc723	, 7 August 2008 (UTC) I dare because its true 190.49.166.166 00:26	0	0	0	0
05e5fb8d860e6d55	When you look at it in the clear light of day, this is an argument in which both sides are doing the same things, and making the same (counter-)accusations. It has been 'resolved,' to date, by the fact that one side of the argument have the power. But might doesn't make right. Who actually started the unreasonable behaviour? Perhaps the Wikipedian who seemed to make the rather ambiguous statement in which he said that the (Holocaust) Talk page is not there for discussion. Well it is there for discussion - that's what a Talk page is. If he meant it is not there for irrelevant discussion he should have stated that explicitly, and, that having been done, be prepared to demonstrate that to anyone who might be in doubt on the matter.80.229.223.248	0	0	0	0
05e65404071455d5	What the fuck gose here	1	1	0	0
05e66cf8d5ab1c9b	Sorry I didn't write a summary. Nevertheless, the reason I removed it was because it was included in the sentence quite arbitrary and borderline OR. The only party to have a continous steady increase in membership (over many years) is the Progress Party. The text had also included the Labour Party on a basis of a short increase for one, two or threee years, but if you look at the article for the party, it had 200,000 members in the 1950s, and around 50,000 today. That is NOT a continous steady increase. -	0	0	0	0
05e79d411c08ce80	Actually Taulant23, Elysonius's edits were very constructive. The only thing that was deleted was the Pelasgians section (and the dead link image of Belushi from Animal House). You have failed to provide sources and have not discussed your reasons for reverting the Albania article.	0	0	0	0
05e7f830a1eb0a13	You You're a little bitch. You can't handle an argument like a man, so you're crying to the administrators. Go fuck yourself.	1	1	1	0
05e9ff78829d1d97	The previous proposal was closed on 16 February. Today is 23 February. We're repeating what was said there. Let's close and hat. We can revisit this in a year.	0	0	0	0
05eb4cd54132e9dc	" Welcome Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address () is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! '''''' Talk/Cont "	0	0	0	0
05eb5b5d8e6cc0b0	" Okay, so almost a month ago this question was asked, and clearly no one cares, so I'm deleting ""Chad"" from this article, although obviously one can't change the name of the language family, wikipedia can at least not contradict itself without any citations."	0	0	0	0
05edda97c7f707bf	Perhaps you didn't read it properly, the agreement is to have both coat fo arms included.	0	0	0	0
05ee06363d9dda77	Hello Mrs Parry How about a nice simple question.How come when you turn around you have titties on your back.Please email me back at [email protected]	0	0	0	0
05eeb3de3198c1f9	I am South African. TAB I am South African. −TAB That does not make you exempt from WP:NPOV. - +TAB That does not make you exempt from WP:NPOV. −TAB So: SA President Jacob Zuma spending USD 27 million of taxpayer money (that should be used to vaccinate all children - which they refuse to do!) - this is a fact - not someone´s imagination- is not NPOV? It is encyclopedic and NPOV !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! −TAB Pres. Zuma abused his power to spend USD 27 million to make non-security related - luxurious - improvements to his private proverty - similar to Republican Schock who made a USD 40 000 Red Room make-over to his political head office - at the expense of taxpayers´ money - for which he resigned immediately when exposed on public TV in the USA (are you against that??????????????) −TABTAB −TAB ALL of this is NPOV: UNLESS YOU ARE CORRUPT, WHICH APPARENTLY YOU ARE VERY MUCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!	0	0	0	0
05ef6f4192d8b73c	Claudio Monteverdi Hello friend! I just wanted to ask you something. Do you consider Claudio Monteverdi a Baroque composer?	0	0	0	0
05efa936c8df5f04	The 'Security Features' reference in the infobox says nothing about the scurity features. Please fix that.	0	0	0	0
05effda0587a8ac5	People like you 359 take he virtual world way too seriously. You are obviously trying to make up for a lack of achievement in your real life which you spend too little time. Do you really think any of this is important? Do you really think the work (I use that word lightly)you do here is going to help anyone anywhere ever? Its not! You are a hack and you would be better off taking up bowling or at least something that gets you out of the house... I feel sorry for you old man. You are a sad soul.	0	0	0	0
05f0ec47ee913b37	Merge At the AfD discussion it was suggested that this article be merged to Texas A&M; College of Science.	0	0	0	0
05f20b9825c2ca89	" Where TRM posted his slur against me is completely irrelevant. A personal attack made behind my back is still a personal attack. TRM [repeated his attack on me with the exact phrase (""i.e. paranoia"") that you explicitly warned him was ""not acceptable at all"" (i.e. blockable offence). With your ""location matters"" logic, all I would've had to do is post my reply on any talkpage except for WT:DYK. Seriously? — "	0	0	0	0
05f45213df86872a	" I'm not really banned, just my account I can change my IP when ever I like (as I have been doing). Anyway. Jack In "	0	0	0	0
05f463da882c8b38	" The comment ""title ""number sign"" to be a confusion induced and enforced by (numerically superior) U.S.American editors"" would seem to be well exemplified by some retorts here. Quite the demonstration of it using strawman arguments. Quite entertaining though. 99.251.125.65 "	0	0	0	0
05f4aae6742097a7	REDIRECT Talk:Gare de Lyon rail accident	0	0	0	0
05f5e56632d0f2ea	" - Invention? - What on earth are you talking about? ""Fact"" is a POV claim? Muhammad started Islam. That's fact because it is what history proves. - I don't understand this weird penchant for non-sequiturs really. Here in this thread why should we leave everything and shift our focus to jesus article? Who cares here if it ""takes a far more nuanced view""? Go talk about it in the Talk:Jesus here "	0	0	0	0
05f6251d52df976f	You are a fool if you think Wikipedia is a respected entitity in this world. So, shut	1	0	1	0
05f67b1d664fd035	mostly burtalbert you fucking asshole go suck a dick u fucking king of assholes	1	1	1	0
05f69d22471ee406	I had enough of you, bastard.	1	1	1	0
05f6c9a04e40939e	Institute of Policy Studies(Sri Lanka) I have created the above article since the previous article was deleted as promotion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_of_Policy_Studies_of_Sri_Lanka Do you think the current version is promotional?	0	0	0	0
05f74ba39a921c3f	" Failed GA Citations in lead are unnecessary. ""Dolores Umbridge, a bureaucrat that slowly becomes an authoritarian figure in the school."" It should be ""who slowly..."" Plot is far too long. An unnecessary cast image: doesn't the poster show Potter and all his pals? The casting section looks thin. Some relevant information could be merged to relevant entries, ala Children of Men. There is very little information on book to film changes. Still, the Reception and Distribution sections look excellent. "	0	0	0	0

05aebb34275b8c4d

It´s blatantly obvious that the only reason why you keep removing this is because you don´t think that Marxist-Leninists are socialists.

0

05aed727911f0f2d

I agree with you, corollary is the word to be used in english. (Lina.lasse)

0

05af49538959fa9e

" List of Boston Bruins head coaches Okay - one more up! Feel free to review. Thanks, « Cøøkie''' "

0

05af610a0a220de7

The least security sign out of your user interface Computer security worker or not, if someone else is using your private computer, particularly if it is someone like dragon, whom you don't know very well, simply log out of your user interface account and have them always use a guest account.

0

05aff915f17379c4

Now that I take a look, I see that the article on John Yoo, who you saw fit to include when re-creating the Rebuttal section as the more enthusiastically titled Support section, also has the controversial nature of his torture-cheerleading memos mentioned right there at the top above the Contents box. FYI.

0

05b03cf98d498f39

I agree with User:Abcedare, the agenda of this user is to sully an absent editor's name & another's reputation by misrepresentation. Nothing in the genuine interest of Wikipedia will come about from this reader's editting.

0

05b07d91eb069a4d

Allow me , award this Epic Barnstar for your great success in redesigning Joseph Stalin articles and its subpages. Thanks a lot, it is much better now ]]

0

05b287f68a12e345

You're missing all the fun

0

05b29420e61ec898

" I assumed you probably weren't, but I'm glad to hear it for sure anyway. I understand. Feel free to stop by anytime. Best regards mate, (talk) "

0

05b3eb232d210fca

Cheers. Your amendment clears it up nicely 23:59, Dec 3, 2003 (UTC)

0

05b42b08035d745e

]]. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.

0

05b4d50a9b6ea480

Someone call a mod, as Hrafn is clearly just mucking around. First he claimed Alfonso was not in Hales, when in fact he is referenced on page 211, a page just after 210. Secondly the work Worship of Augustus Caesar mentions Panvinio (Panvinus), and in fact even references Hales p.211.

0

05b6df1d5188d5f1

Do you know what you're sooooo right, You've just hit the nail of the fecking head there, you really have and have made my day in the process –) —

0

05b849129c6307aa

Personally, I would create articles if there were any topics that I liked to create. Also, as to expanding articles, I would be happy to, but almost all of the information that I have to add has already been added by someone else. Cheers,

0

05b9130fbda1c206

This entry was deleted by its author, owing to the fact that it contains research which is being distorted somewhat. Since it's a part of an ongoing research piece by a working journalist, I've decided that any distorition to the research could be problematic. Thus, the simplest thing to do in order to avoid antagonizations, distortions, etc, is to remove it. Since you have decided to continue this antagonization, I am left with no alternative but to report you to those in a place of authority at Wikipedia. Of course, you may feel free to complete and post your own research on the Havana shipyards however, I've decided the best course of action is to register the copyright on all pertinent research statements and images associated with this article. Use of any of the above by persons other than the author, without his permission, is in violation of international copyright standards and will be promplty reported to the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) and all other pertinent authorities.

0

05b93eb05e5700fb

" Re:Meetup thread Well, ""COI"" can be a pretty harsh word on Wikipedia, and your misconception of ""David Shankbone"" as a real name probably sounded more like bitter irony. And sometimes people tend to get hotter in conversation than they intend. Online communication can be difficult, and there is a reason why human beings have faces. "

0

05ba6ba405ec20f5

For how long did they block your Fab Four nickname? M.V.E.i.

0

05ba8dba0fe74063

It is also crystal clear to notice, only federer has these so called fake achievements page about his shitting n even pissing, when players like Nadal Sampras who had way more better records dont have it? Its because this page was trolled by fans of federer over and over and they added almost every non existent things as records- a total lie to wikipedia viewers.

0

05bb2bf6d6fe1bd4

Found the scientific name. Ⓣ

0

05bb5cfecdf4b5a1

We have over 400 people who are willing to use their real names, and that's before we've gone public and before any serious recruitment efforts. So I'm not worried.

0

05bb7ce92287b3c6

Bolonium: No offense but accept the reality and the reality is an independent Kosova.

0

05bb95ca51204370

I think that the infobox should at least have a picture of Muhammad, if there is to be one anywhere. The image for the page on Muhammad should be a depiction of Muhammad. Having calligraphy or symbolism replace an actual picture would not be in the spirit of wikipedia. Regrettably, it will offend some people, but that is not, nor should be, the impetus behind any decision. A picture of Muhammad would be more encyclopedic and offer more knowledge, therefore, it is the only real option if this is to remain a truly neutral place to obtain knowledge. Also, I feel like there is an overabundance of images in this article. Lots of images of redundant or mildly irrelevant things, as if people are unconsciously putting in different images because they feel bad about putting in an image of Muhammad.

0

05bbbe44f6bbda8f

You're welcome. Some of my work was also quoted in the Ambrose book, but they were all correctly acknowledged and footnoted and thus not among the errors and corrections noted in the researchers' paper.

0

05bced9214593533

Thank you! I took an extended Wiki-break recently, so it's very nice to receive a new barnstar so soon after my return. Best wishes,

0

05bde2e257e74eca

The only thing you are persistant at you ugly bastard is fucking the TROLL'''

1

0

1

0

1

0

05beafaff2055045

"*I only have one source that even says he was in in track and fied. In any case, I changed it to ""played track and field."" ~'''' (talk/contribs/editor review)~ "

0

05c00892d91aafba

I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. I asked how much of our language was replaced with words from French and Italian. Are you saying that our language was replaced by 70-80 percent with French and Italian words? I'm guessing there is a misunderstanding here, but yes, please can a script to find out. Do anything you can. We should know these figures.

0

05c03c60cfc24476

REDIRECT Talk:The Bear (1998 film)

0

05c12dd7c265e22d

He was not a hacker He was not a hacker, the correct term is called a cracker.

0

05c1f66548965da9

" Unapproved bot. You appear to be using your content as a bot, in violation of WP:BOT. Please, stop using your main account as a bot until it is approved. If your bot is approved, please make sure it is flagged as a bot and listed on Wikipedia:Bots/Status. ☯ "

0

05c24874add93682

Why is it that there have been about FIVE DIFFERENT EDITORS change the elimination chart, but the same person always changes it back. Does that sound like a consensus? 76.107.17.32

0

05c3a1aaed7932ba

You find that uncivil? Seriously???? I just re-read it in the light of your comments, and I still don't find it the least bit uncivil. It's an honest assessment of his actions. Maybe he would prefer not to hear it, but the intention was to help him improve as an admin. Please think a bit more kindly about me. Nobody has ever accused me of incivility before.

0

05c4f931b053d397

" Hm. I'll ask someone who would know when they're on. "

0

05c5392db862c291

" If you were to go to the slide that defines ""Genetic Drift"" at baen.tamu.edu/users/cengler/biology/notes/chapt16.ppt you would read: ""Genetic drift is a change in allele frequency due to random variation in fecundity and mortality in a population."" This seems to be exactly the point I was trying to make in the text that provoked the charge of inaccuracy. Would the accuser please clarify? 21:09 19 May 2003 (UTC)"

0

05c547ffc4a0a78e

user zora, i have no interest in hearing what user moshe has to say, the best way to deal with people like her is to ignore them. Now once again you have reverted eminent to distinguished even after agreement. Because of this, like i said before there is no more discussion here, we already came to an agreement, and the word eminent stays, if bridesmill and moshe don't like that that's their problem. Furthermore moshe i have repeatedly asked you to cooperate, again i have no hate for you and do not want to engage in a war here, but i will not let you vandalize it either. like we talk about it before why can't you just be like the russian-jewish sweet girl i had? lol:), same goes for bridesmill ).

0

05c5934907a2d7c0

That makes it so much easier. I didn't know I was allowed to do that. Thanks!

0

05c69b5996aa5557

" Colorado balloon incident Greetings. I reverted your addition of a news photograph of the Colorado balloon incident balloon. Unfortunately, Wikipedia's use is exactly like the commercial use for commercial news photography. As the template you used states: ""Use of historic images from press agencies must only be used in a transformative nature, when the image itself is the subject of commentary rather than the event it depicts"". It's intended for images which are themselves iconic works of art so that we can use the images to primarily facilitate discussion of the image. Even ignoring the legal problems with using the news photography: Wikipedia has a hard requirement for freely licensed images because non-free media compromises the freely licensed status of Wikipedia. Refer to the first rule at WP:NFCC; non-free images are not to be used unless obtaining a freely licensed could not be reasonably believed to be possible. There were undoubtedly thousands of photographs of this balloon taken by amateurs and professionals alike, almost any would do for the purposes of the article. Wikinews claims that the balloon was low-flying and that photographs were captured by area residents. The best way to get an image for the article would be to leave a placeholder in the article requesting that the public submit one. The effectiveness of such a place holder will probably diminish over time as the attention on this incident dies down. I've been checking flickr and other photo sites but have so far come up dry, though sometimes it takes a little while for people to bother uploading their photographs. I hope I haven't given the impression that I do not appropriate your contributions to the article— as I do, especially your efforts to use even and neutral language in the face of a media environment eager to describe the parties unfavourably. Thanks for your contributions! "

0

05c6ca0daefe69ba

" This is A Potentially Ridiculous Article Seriously, it is a potentially ridiculous article, and mislead readers to comprehend the word ""x86"", for the following reasons: 1. Should sort AMD64 or Intel64 implementations as x86? Generally ""x86"" was used to point all the processors compatible with IA-32 ISA, might or might name themselves with ""86"", such as Cyrix 5x86, Intel Pentium 4 and so on. AMD64's long mode is devised by AMD rather than Intel, so how can one sort them together. Nowadays software labeled themselves as ""x86"" are IA-32 compatible software, and use ""x64"" or ""x86-64"" differentiating with it. So this article confuses reader getting in touch with this word. 2. Generations? What is the 8th generation x86 processor? Who invented this kinda processors? AMD K8 just says that it succeeds AMD K7 rather than saying it is the 8th x86 processor, and I've never heard Intel call their x86 processors exceeding the 7th generation. And one thing should never be denied, the first generation of Itanium processor says its family model number as 7, which might potentially imply that Itanium might be the 7th x86 processor succeeding Pentium III, but none confirmed this. So take turn back the Transmeta's Crusoe and Efficeon, if the morph firmed on the system board implements x86 decoder call themselves as x86 processors, then if put the same processor on another board implementing PowerPC decoder, then it would be the PowerPC processor? At this situation, what kind of processor is it? Ridiculous! What's more for what sort it as the 7th/8th generation x86? Who is another Jane Austen, making up another Northanger Abbey? 3. ""x86"" is one architecture(ISA) name? What such a ridiculous thing that I've ever heard on earth! ""x86"" is used to referring the processor, a kind or series of processors rather than an architecture. If it were the name of an architecture, then in this logic way, Intel 80486 is one of the ""implementation"" of this ""architecture""? "

0

05c73c6c6434cf7c

WTF? Banned? Some person in a fourm said it is banned in Syria do to the closeness of the names Al-Asad and Al-Assad. The correct form is Al Asad in the game. I said he was wrong and he went crazy saying some dumb stuff that I was stupid. Who is right, cause I could find No Source that confirmed his statement that this game is banned in Syria. Asad and Assad are very common middle eastern names anyway 72.138.216.89

1

0

05c7b99e5b754c4c

Amcom article Hi Earlier today I noticed that there is no article on Amcom, and I posted on the Amnet talk page, before moving it to talk:Amcom (because although the network is called Amnet, the actual company is called Amcom). I didn't realize until later that there was already an Amcom (actually Amnet) page that had been deleted. After reading the explanation for the deletion, I'm not sure whether Amcom really has enough notability or not. However, if we do want to make an Amcom page we will have to supply some secondary sources to justify the company's notability. If you are still interested, take a look at this article I found: If you want to reply to me, make sure you either reply on my talk page, or leave a note there saying that you have replied elsewhere. Otherwise, I won't know that you've replied. Welcome and good luck! -

0

05c81f5a2b399354

Nathan Hamilton Thanks for your assistance here. (talk)

0

05c94f71d373b23a

No problem. I didn't even recognize the misspelling myself. All you have to do is copy the content you're interested in from one article and add it the correct article. Then redirect the misspelled one (see Wikipedia:Redirect). Alternately, to delete an article in which you are the sole editor add (see Wikipedia:Speedy deletion) to it and an administrator will delete it. (Edgar181)

0

05c964eb1d12da67

" Scorched earth. If I'm wrong, I apologize, but your current behavior isn't helping you any. Rocco is big on erasing embarrassing things from his talk page and now you're doing the same. Even if you're not also a sock of Belchfire, this is not very collegial of you. Listen, MilesMoney. It is your right to accuse me of being a sock of ""belchfire"" or ""rocco"". That is your right. Of course, you are wrong, but that is not surprising because you are wrong about so many different things. Also, I have right to remove each and every thing written on my talk page. I will continue to do that, especially since many, many of the things written there are just flat out lies. For example, you have stated that I am a sock of ""belchfire"" and I am a sock of ""rocco"". These statements are bald faced lies. I don't have to let you keep those lies on my talk page. I tell you what you go fight your PROV-tainted fights with ""belchfire"" and ""rocco"", but leave me alone. I have no idea what those fights are about, but I do know that you are always full convinced that your point of view must be adopted by all of the other editors. I also know that you have a history of not working cooperatively with others. These are facts. Now, go and get back to your POV pushing and stay off my talk page, unless you have something constructive to discuss concerning an article that I am actually editing. "

0

05ca1ec519e6efb0

fuck you Muthafucka , you jerk you scum lowlife loser !! hehe hahah188.23.179.183

1

0

1

0

1

0

05ca53f49434e9aa

Bob Lynch (comics) That article is created by Bob Lynch himself, which is a clear violation of Wikipedia policies. Also, no, the proposed deletion has not been declined. Is Bob Lynch your friend? The image that you deleted is that of Bob Lynch himself, so it has a direct relation to the article that should be deleted anyhow.

0

05ca6a6ec2418af6

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Jackie Robinson Just to notify you.

0

05cba91c47dde423

See WT:MEDRS#Acupuncture_source. Have also explained the issue clearly at (POV-pushing • )

0

05cbfb6e5a064ab0

wow could you be more vague (82.28.237.200 )

0

05ccd99eecaf5cdf

" Aug 10 2010 Death Hoax currently underway Ebaumsworld is currently trying to get ""Oprah Winfrey Dead at 56"" to the top of Google Trends. Monitor article closely."

0

05cd3f74b3b96c91

Hapsford Please cite sources for this article. Otherwise, it may be tagged as a candidate for deletion in the near future. Cheers. ++

0

05ce5ada155ccee6

" Well, it's been quite some time since I last saw PAL seat maps. I wonder if they'll retain the arrangement in the refurbished cabin? "

0

05ceb52df5035d34

REDIRECT Talk:Ron Link (singer)

0

05d01e1b6aa405d5

Stop harrassing users as you have on User talk:WWGB. You've ignored my repeated warnings and are asking to be banned.

0

05d226bbde012644

Now you too, as in previous issues, present me as the guilty one. I refuse this status, I don't see reasons. What should I understand: that he has the right to intimidate me and if I say that the allegations are not true, I am still the guilty one? He presented them as Romani those who organized the Rajput -> Romani theory.

0

05d2bc5c9264fb4f

Look you little cocksucker. I did nothing wrong. I am sick of your bullshit harassment and you are really starting to piss me off you little pussy. I am doing nothing wrong so just swallow your pride (I know it's hard for you) and admit you lost this fight. Now piss off! Blackeyedfool12

1

0

1

0

1

0

05d4383a1d06abac

Man... what's your source?

0

05d43dda7784c665

" I will also try to be less bitey in the future.— dαlus Contribs "

0

05d585bdfaf477be

Thank you For being vigilant in your mission to prevent people from laughing. We wouldn't want anyone to forget how serious this place is and how important you all are. In glumness and constipation, I remain your faithful editor.

0

05d599de3eea648b

re: Quadminton Apologies for deleting the 'article delete' box! S I thought that that was the way to make my democratic feelings known - but obviously not! Thanks for the helpful tone of your message - I'll try not to screw up next time! RM

0

05d64672770cf199

" I agree to that. many parts of the article is apparently biased, made-up bs. Examples following Downfall: ""It was common knowledge that de Molay planned on corrupting Catherine of Valois' male children by tending to their sorrows, then by engaging in acts of anal rape."" ""Philip knew the dangers that de Molay represented; his own sons were nearly sexually molested by de Molay. Upon escaping the vile pervert, they confessed to Philip what de Molay had tried to do."" Myths: ""It is said that Jacques de Molay cursed Philippe le Bel and his descent from his execution pyre, a curse which was responded to by Philip shouting in defiance ""Fuck de Molay!"""" ""It has been speculated that several of the boys whom de Molay had corrupted had grown to enjoy the perversions of the homosexual lifestyle introduced to them"" Legacy: ""Members are encouraged to model their conduct after his example of loyalty and fidelity instead of the homosexual perversions that de Molay was guilty of himself."" ... ""vile pervert"", ""homosexual perversions"", sheesh... Could someone SANE please clean up this article? "

1

0

05d7f58055c46e54

Scott, I apologize, but you are writing way too much for me to respond coherently. If you would like to email me (see

0

05dbe7a437525101

No, you are the racist, you goddamn neo-Nazi YOU BIG BOY

1

0

1

0

1

05dc2045c8500f31

Something suspicious about the Durrani Empire article Hello Kansas Bear, I think there is something suspicious going on in the Durrani Empire page. I would like to have your opinion on it.

0

05dc45286840261f

Do you even know what feminism is?

0

05dc64ac8fbc5486

" Reality check: Montevideo does not require relations with foreign states. It merely requires the ""capacity"" to enter into relations with foreign states. - "

0

05dc8e8734b3dcd5

Heh. It's no more reaching than your assumption that they wouldn't have watched the Obama speech on a different channel if it hadn't aired on the one they watched it on. I was just pointing out the fallacy of your assumption that simply because they watched it on Telemundo or Univision that they would not have watched it on a different channel. (rants)

0

05dd1d52520295a7

Please do not vandalise Wikipedia. You will find Wikipedia:Why Wikipedia is so great and Wikipedia:Replies to common objections informative. 02:17, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

0

05de4f58dd4ff2b5

It's .gba, a special filetype created for it, mainly.

0

05deec00d640ca08

I'll extend the hold time.

0

05e0dc751b1ab359

Dunmanway title change Rockpocket - it appears impossible to return to the old title of Dunmanway Massacre which Sarah777 seems to have changed on 28 October and then had protected in some way. I am not clear on this one not knowing the rules well enough. Is that the case and how would one return to the old title?

0

05e1f7b3ec3e9e2f

== good grief. can you read? why don't you try examining the substance of the links? I am sick and tired of children ranting without reading. ~~

1

0

05e2006bb43727ad

=Revelvant? Is this page on 9/11 CT's really relevant. Its like saying the Moon is made from Cheese, or like taking David Icke seriously. It just plays into the hands of the idiots that come up with these theories, who at the end of the day are/ were trying to get to get 15 minutes of fame on the backs of the victims of 9/11.

0

05e2a29e780a64de

" ""WP:Null edits always make me laugh - in French, a ""nul"" is a ""dummy""... so in French, instead of ""Microsoft Access for Dummies"" you have ""Microsoft Access pour les nuls"" (talk→ ←track) "

0

05e4b5b26a114183

" Bong said Zebedee said , you did , ""there was a magnitude of difference"" , now you say you did not , he said I may consider reporting him/her , now you say ""feel free to report me as BSZ suggests"" . did BSZ suggest I report him/her , or did BSZ suggest I report you ,or are you saying that BSZ said report him/her but actually mean report you . Its really confusing . "

0

05e513532c8fc723

, 7 August 2008 (UTC) I dare because its true 190.49.166.166 00:26

0

05e5fb8d860e6d55

When you look at it in the clear light of day, this is an argument in which both sides are doing the same things, and making the same (counter-)accusations. It has been 'resolved,' to date, by the fact that one side of the argument have the power. But might doesn't make right. Who actually started the unreasonable behaviour? Perhaps the Wikipedian who seemed to make the rather ambiguous statement in which he said that the (Holocaust) Talk page is not there for discussion. Well it is there for discussion - that's what a Talk page is. If he meant it is not there for irrelevant discussion he should have stated that explicitly, and, that having been done, be prepared to demonstrate that to anyone who might be in doubt on the matter.80.229.223.248

0

05e65404071455d5

What the fuck gose here

1

0

1

0

05e66cf8d5ab1c9b

Sorry I didn't write a summary. Nevertheless, the reason I removed it was because it was included in the sentence quite arbitrary and borderline OR. The only party to have a continous steady increase in membership (over many years) is the Progress Party. The text had also included the Labour Party on a basis of a short increase for one, two or threee years, but if you look at the article for the party, it had 200,000 members in the 1950s, and around 50,000 today. That is NOT a continous steady increase. -

0

05e79d411c08ce80

Actually Taulant23, Elysonius's edits were very constructive. The only thing that was deleted was the Pelasgians section (and the dead link image of Belushi from Animal House). You have failed to provide sources and have not discussed your reasons for reverting the Albania article.

0

05e7f830a1eb0a13

You You're a little bitch. You can't handle an argument like a man, so you're crying to the administrators. Go fuck yourself.

1

0

1

0

1

0

05e9ff78829d1d97

The previous proposal was closed on 16 February. Today is 23 February. We're repeating what was said there. Let's close and hat. We can revisit this in a year.

0

05eb4cd54132e9dc

" Welcome Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address () is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! '''''' Talk/Cont "

0

05eb5b5d8e6cc0b0

" Okay, so almost a month ago this question was asked, and clearly no one cares, so I'm deleting ""Chad"" from this article, although obviously one can't change the name of the language family, wikipedia can at least not contradict itself without any citations."

0

05edda97c7f707bf

Perhaps you didn't read it properly, the agreement is to have both coat fo arms included.

0

05ee06363d9dda77

Hello Mrs Parry How about a nice simple question.How come when you turn around you have titties on your back.Please email me back at [email protected]

0

05eeb3de3198c1f9

I am South African. TAB I am South African. −TAB That does not make you exempt from WP:NPOV. - +TAB That does not make you exempt from WP:NPOV. −TAB So: SA President Jacob Zuma spending USD 27 million of taxpayer money (that should be used to vaccinate all children - which they refuse to do!) - this is a fact - not someone´s imagination- is not NPOV? It is encyclopedic and NPOV !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! −TAB Pres. Zuma abused his power to spend USD 27 million to make non-security related - luxurious - improvements to his private proverty - similar to Republican Schock who made a USD 40 000 Red Room make-over to his political head office - at the expense of taxpayers´ money - for which he resigned immediately when exposed on public TV in the USA (are you against that??????????????) −TABTAB −TAB ALL of this is NPOV: UNLESS YOU ARE CORRUPT, WHICH APPARENTLY YOU ARE VERY MUCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

0

05ef6f4192d8b73c

Claudio Monteverdi Hello friend! I just wanted to ask you something. Do you consider Claudio Monteverdi a Baroque composer?

0

05efa936c8df5f04

The 'Security Features' reference in the infobox says nothing about the scurity features. Please fix that.

0

05effda0587a8ac5

People like you 359 take he virtual world way too seriously. You are obviously trying to make up for a lack of achievement in your real life which you spend too little time. Do you really think any of this is important? Do you really think the work (I use that word lightly)you do here is going to help anyone anywhere ever? Its not! You are a hack and you would be better off taking up bowling or at least something that gets you out of the house... I feel sorry for you old man. You are a sad soul.

0

05f0ec47ee913b37

Merge At the AfD discussion it was suggested that this article be merged to Texas A&M; College of Science.

0

05f20b9825c2ca89

" Where TRM posted his slur against me is completely irrelevant. A personal attack made behind my back is still a personal attack. TRM [repeated his attack on me with the exact phrase (""i.e. paranoia"") that you explicitly warned him was ""not acceptable at all"" (i.e. blockable offence). With your ""location matters"" logic, all I would've had to do is post my reply on any talkpage except for WT:DYK. Seriously? — "

0

05f45213df86872a

" I'm not really banned, just my account I can change my IP when ever I like (as I have been doing). Anyway. Jack In "

0

05f463da882c8b38

" The comment ""title ""number sign"" to be a confusion induced and enforced by (numerically superior) U.S.American editors"" would seem to be well exemplified by some retorts here. Quite the demonstration of it using strawman arguments. Quite entertaining though. 99.251.125.65 "

0

05f4aae6742097a7

REDIRECT Talk:Gare de Lyon rail accident

0

05f5e56632d0f2ea

" - Invention? - What on earth are you talking about? ""Fact"" is a POV claim? Muhammad started Islam. That's fact because it is what history proves. - I don't understand this weird penchant for non-sequiturs really. Here in this thread why should we leave everything and shift our focus to jesus article? Who cares here if it ""takes a far more nuanced view""? Go talk about it in the Talk:Jesus here "

0

05f6251d52df976f

You are a fool if you think Wikipedia is a respected entitity in this world. So, shut

1

0

1

0

05f67b1d664fd035

mostly burtalbert you fucking asshole go suck a dick u fucking king of assholes

1

0

1

0

1

0

05f69d22471ee406

I had enough of *you*, bastard.

1

0

1

0

1

0

05f6c9a04e40939e

Institute of Policy Studies(Sri Lanka) I have created the above article since the previous article was deleted as promotion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_of_Policy_Studies_of_Sri_Lanka Do you think the current version is promotional?

0

05f74ba39a921c3f

" Failed GA Citations in lead are unnecessary. ""Dolores Umbridge, a bureaucrat that slowly becomes an authoritarian figure in the school."" It should be ""who slowly..."" Plot is far too long. An unnecessary cast image: doesn't the poster show Potter and all his pals? The casting section looks thin. Some relevant information could be merged to relevant entries, ala Children of Men. There is very little information on book to film changes. Still, the Reception and Distribution sections look excellent. "

0