is_offensive
int64 0
1
| text
stringlengths 1
5k
|
|---|---|
1 | What kind of freak keeps obsessive stalkerish lists of people posting in favour of someone's innocence? A dirty little basement dwelling creep, that's who. 109.145.67.105 |
1 | "
J.Delanoy, YOU are an imbecilic bootkissing asshole: ""pwn"" my sockfarm? Fat chance, I've secretly vandalised some obscure pages. If Admins block me for this, they have no balls and no life.
Do you even think you got a chance to ban me that easily? I've created socks to save up for the big day of vandalism! HAHA!
'nuff said.
" |
0 | I have suggested that they move it to a sandbox. You have not addressed the important issue of article focus and I left a verbose comment on your talk page, where you were notified of the article deletion initially. — |
0 | I'm right about the chart edits I make as well 95% of the time. |
0 | Pictures in family albums are usually unpublished. If it is indeed anonymous and created less than 120 years ago, then it is still copyrighted in the United States as it does not yet satisfy . In that case, you will have to ask the heir of the anonymous photographer to follow the procedure at WP:CONSENT. |
0 | REDIRECT Talk:Abang Haji Abdillah |
0 | "
Did you not read my above posts? I was underlining the issue here, that even given the ""scholarly majority"" that does not automatically mean that it has to be mentioned in the lead (can you UNDERSTAND THAT POINT?), as was pointed out by other editors earlier, and this was also pointed out by " |
0 | "
I can second this one. Having worked in the print journalism industry, I can testify - gee, that's not ""original research"", is it? - that double-spacing is no longer required save for some local courts which require submitted documents have the double-spacing after punctuation marks. The irony here is that they require it because they're using older scanners and OCR software, and this helps reduce scanning interpretation error, and the documents produced themselves are *stripped* of the extra space! " |
0 | let me make it clear: if you again add a false claim to the article, I am no longer willing to check each single claim for correctness but I will revert all. You did wast too much time already! |
0 | Hey, this is JaysCyYoung. Thank you very much for the kind welcome to Wikipedia as a registered user. I appreciate your offer of help. I have, however, been editing and creating many articles ananymously for quite some time now, so I don't believe that will be necessary. Your warm welcome is greatly appreciated though!
Jameson. |
0 | Since it's not warming at the moment (the last decade) I would agree with this change of name. |
0 | Igot to level 21 so far on flappy birds smh |
0 | Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. |
1 | Go watch Buffy the Vampire Slayer or what ever you simpleton's do, because I am done using your ego as a urinal. |
0 | Jeezus. I'll have to whip out the checkbook with the number of slips I make that desperately need your attention. If only I could sent one of my Cornish pastries by email in recompense (you'd end up overweight, if I had to send one for every fix you manage). |
0 | "
I've changed it to the ""neutrality"" tag as we all seem to agree that this is the problem with the article. " |
0 | "
Reply Oh, not half as interesting as it sounds.:O) ·(t) " |
0 | And two people, one on talk and one in the article have recently supported my edits and replaced the gist of them - with yet another solid reference! |
0 | Another welcome!
Hi there - Welcome to Wikipedia! I saw your edits to Peter Rawlinson, Baron Rawlinson of Ewell - I had been planning on updating the article with news of his death - he was on the list of those whose souls should be prayed for as they had recently died, at his local church, St. Mary the Virgin, Ewell, where [ my mum] is Director of Music. What is your connection with Ewell? PS. Get yourself an account. |
0 | Well, you blocked the page for 5 days until he came back and made the similar arguments. And another Admin did admonish him for making arguments as to whether or not BBC and CNN were fair over HRW. And he starts trying to argue with that admin. Look at the page Talk:2009–10 Iranian election protests. He dosent know what Wikipedia is. He shouldnt be editing articles, until he realizes that CNN and BBC are allowed to be used as sources and that Wikipedia is not a place for him to propagate his views. |
0 | I agree this is a bad idea. Merging Soteriology with Salvation would be like merging Geography with Earth... one is a concept, the other is a field of study – close, but not exactly the same thing. |
0 | WP:GUNS importance assessment
As you surmised, the ten percent standard is intended to be interpreted as an order of magnitude, rather than a difference between a disqualified 9 percent and a qualified 11 percent. I am certainly open to alternative suggestions to clarify the criterion; but I disagree about the absence of sources to define an order of magnitude quantification.
The American gun culture includes a large number of writers who emphasize opinions rather than pursuing statistics. As the internet allows anyone to screen for information sources confirming an existing bias, such authors may be well represented by conventional search-engine algorithms. I personally enjoyed articles by Elmer Keith and Jack O'Connor relating divergent first-hand experiences hunting with light or heavy bullets; but I sought out articles by Julian Hatcher to find results of side-by-side scientific method comparisons.
I believe sources are available to quantify the features qualifying as top importance articles. It may be difficult to find quantification in the popular press (including the anti-gun press); but well-researched sources are worth the effort required to find them.
Assessment of importance requires a fundamental understanding of the subject; and the amount of time required will vary inversely with the experience of the editor. I wouldn't encourage you to undertake this assessment task with an unrealistic impression of the knowledge or time required. As a practical matter, however, you may understand the subject well enough to know the answer after reading the article. If you think the subject represented more than ten percent of the firearms or ammunition, it's probably a top importance article; but it's probably not top importance if you have doubts. I doubt your decisions on that basis will be challenged; but it shouldn't be an unreasonable task to find documentation on the few which might be. |
1 | FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU ALL!! FUCK YOU |
0 | "
Wikipedia
Cross-posting
David, could you gently refrain from interfering off-wiki 'personal' stuff (i.e. blogs and newspapers) with Wikipedia's business? This is the second time in less than a week (referring to your post at the AC/N a few days ago). This certainly doesn't help building the encyclopedia at all. - Wiki me up® " |
0 | Violation of WP:3RR
I am reporting you for a violation of WP:3RR at user talk:George. 94.2.200.100 |
0 | Once you get to Spanish monarchs and pretenders who neither ruled over nor specifically claimed any part of the Burgundian inheritance, I think the chain is getting pretty slim indeed. k |
0 | ==User Page==
You should move the above information to your user page and remove it from your talk page. 20:41, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
1 | @daijahshardaee yess bitch cuts, colors, and curls ha self. |
1 | Just cause i liked a photo from 32 weeks ago don't mean i'm stalking you bitch you just don't look as good as you used to |
0 | "
===Reason for the three tags===
I have placed three tags on the ""Backgound to the Controversy"" section. This section cannot be the place to debate the case of AIT supporters or opponents. Please note that the article is about the historical etc. aspects of AIT. For debates, please see Indo-Aryan migration. But I request people not to go there just to put their partisan points of view. I have noticed some such statements in this section.
============================================" |
0 | "==""Largest ancient parkland"" but Richmond Park 3 times bigger? ==
The article calls HH ""London's largest ancient parkland covering 790 acres"", but Richmond Park is officially almost 2500 acres and 2360 according to Wikipedia. Should this claim qualified with ""one of ..."", or maybe removed? William
" |
1 | shut the HOLe in ur fae bann m fat boy is i lookin bovered |
0 | "
Withdrawn charges
The London Free press also reported that his charges were withdrawn silently. Now from the perspective of a normal criminal process, this usually means the police had a weak case. The fact that the police were gung-ho about this case may also suggest that the police had no case at all (judging by the seemingly high-profile aspect to this case). In other words, Homeontherange's addition of that information is a pretty clear sign that the information is being added in order to disparage James Scott Richardson.
What is my point of reference? Well. When I added information to Alex Kulbashian and Richard Warman about a Canadian Human Rights Commission complaint file by Alex against Richard, Homeontherange removed the information stating that the complaint could have been filed, however it wasn't serious enough to because there was no evidence the Commissioner signed off on it. Now, getting back to this case, the crown attorney and/or withdrew the charges because there was no prospect for conviction.
To Homeontherange: If you are going to have double standards in ""enforcing"" wikipedia's criteria for information posted in articles, then that shows your political motivation behind your edits and the way you handle your ""administrative"" tasks. That would be classified as Administrator Abuse Wikipedia:Administrators#Administrator_abuse. Furthermore, the fact that the IP address 72.136.34.96 spontaneously lost the ability to make edits without logging in with no explanation could also show a certain level of abuse of administrative rights (by the way. Will be reporting that to Jimbo Wales). So feel free to revert the edit I've made, but make an attempt to justify your actions this time." |
0 | "
With respect Wikipedia works on the basis of consensus and you alone are not in a position to say when the discussion is closed. That said I would have no problem inserting the same words that you quote viz ""The English Army, founded in 1660, was succeeded in 1707 by the new British Army"" into this article to give additional context. I hope that helps. " |
0 | 404 translated *humor*
For the humor-inclined:
ibiblio.org's 404 page has a long list of translations, including non-human languages like Klingon and C. /(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) |
0 | I've been talking with the user on their talk page, to try to save the editor for the encyclopaedia. I'm being reminded strongly of my behaviour around Hungarian Revolution of 1956's failings (and its still current failings). |
1 | Can you let me stretch that pussy out or nah |
0 | Hi , hope you're doing well! Matthew asked me to take a look at the post. I really like the idea, and I think you have the basics down perfectly. I'm wondering if we can add a bit more of a human interest angle to it, though? Maybe interview a few editors who've worked on it over time, or the ones who brought it to FA status? Why were they motivated to achieve a FA for it? What challenges did they face along the way? It could be something like the Signposts's WikiProject report where you interview a few editors who've contributed to the article.
Another suggestion would be to talk more about some stats. How many edits has the article had, page views over the last year or two, editor discussion in all the talk pages, etc. Something to make it more real and make our blog audience (who is mostly not editors) understand what a very cool achievement this is.
Let me know if you have any questions! (talk) |
0 | Whipped |
0 | "
Concordia primary topic?
Hi, Anthony! You previously commented at Talk:Concordia University (Montreal)#Move?, regarding a requested (un)move, and I'm wondering if you've had a chance to review the discussion since? Thanks! jæs (talk) " |
0 | "==Cross-cultural correlates section==
This right here: ""A comparative analysis of Zhitro and Chöd would be informative.""
is pretty much the definition of OR. B9, if you can find references where this parallel has been discussed, please provide and include them, otherwise I think this last section needs to be removed. Thank you. " |
0 | |EpisodeNumber= 117
|EpisodeNumber2= 4
|Title= Goodbye Natalie?
|DirectedBy= Joe Menendez
|WrittenBy= Jason Jordan
|OriginalAirDate=
|ProdCode= 506
|ShortSummary=Natalie leaves to New York for a movie.
|LineColor= 007FFF
}}
{{Episode list |
0 | Self source fom FEE does not counteract the RS article sources according to wikipedia regulations . You must not editwar per wikipedia. Please remember the warning from last year concering special rules for this article.You can be restricted if you keep warring against the article RS and independent description of thinktank in the main part of the article. You should undo your editwar change. Thank you very much. 166.172.60.2 |
0 | "
RfA thank you
Thank you! , it is with deep awareness of the responsibility conferred by your trust that I am honored to report that in part to your support, my request for adminship passed (87/14/6). I deeply value the trust you and the Wikipedia community have in me, and I will embark on a new segment of my Wikipedia career by putting my new tools to work to benefit the entire community. My best to you, (talk)
And a special thank you to you, Sandy, a wodnerful person whom I consider a true friend and my mentor. (talk) " |
0 | I actually think the real explanation is Iranian policies and Iranian money. Simple enough. |
0 | "
Your edits to Sahara
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Donald Albury " |
0 | "
Copied from the document:
Reports and proceedings of the 8 April European public hearing on “Crimes committed by totalitarian regimes, organised by the Slovenian Presidency of the Council of the European Union (January–June 2008) and the European Commission. Notice the word Report, It is on the document itself.
You should say it was published by: Slovenian Presidency of the Council of the European Union & etc. Issue addressed.
My citation on the article: European Public Hearing on ""Crimes Committed by Totalitarian Regimes” Slovenian Presidency of the Council of the European Union (January–June 2008) and the European Commission. (As per document). I'll check my other ones and if they are not per document, I'll change them. " |
0 | Uncited works
Don't remove good examples simply because they were not cited as such, by putting them here, WE are citing them for the first time! As for those who insist that they are Wikipedia know-it-alls, probably because they haven't been laid for a while (or at all!), I suggest you take a bath and brush your teeth more often a mouthwash will also help. 220.244.175.139 free speech is in the constitution |
0 | The Rules section of 4chan's Page includes a description of permitted content on each board. |
1 | Reversion
Given that some jerk vandalized the characters section by changing the names to various Nintendo characters, I have reverted to a much older version. |
0 | The inappropriate caption to the photo was added unilaterally and without any discussion. I herewith revert the changes, with the ff rationale: THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT TWINK (GAY SLANG), AND NOT CORRIGAN'S CAREER ACHIEVEMENTS.72.68.115.204 |
0 | "
There you go again. ""Blunder"" is not a neutral term. It implies he made a mistake, an error, that he meant to say ""Bradford"" or ""Belfast"" or somewhere else, that instead of ""Muslims"" he meant ""Mammals"" etc etc. Clearly that is nonsensical. There is no city in Britain that fits his description. There is nothing to get confused about. It can only be a deliberate piece of misinformation propaganda. By uncritically repeating the perpetrating own characterization of his words (an ""error""), the Wikipedia article is retaining that bias. And come on, that's not a difficult concept. If you don't feel competent as an editor to understand that part of [WP:NPOV] you probably should refrain from editing. " |
0 | Gz on male nurse job XD |
0 | David E. Kelley article
Please stop inserting information that violates WP:POV. I, or others, will continue to revert it. If you have a different view, please participate on the article's talk page at Talk:David E. Kelley. Thanks, |
0 | "
I'd maintain it was only a personal attack, the user I 'edit warred' with is clearly not going to last another hour given the amount of editors on his case now. I'm sorry - for you. talk to me " |
0 | These appear correct. I'm thinking the county divisions for the stubs might work out best. |
0 | REDIRECT Talk:GJ 758 C |
0 | @kayliefarmer hey now there's no need for foul language you kike |
0 | The vote was division no. 74, November 2: . It was on an amendment to the Bill, not the Bill itself (the amendment would have required the prosecution to prove that a statement was intended to incite terrorism, rather than that it might have that effect, in order to secure a conviction). The original result announced was Ayes 299, Noes 300. Had Galloway attended he would have voted Aye and the result would have been declared a tie at 300, but the Speaker would have given his casting vote to the Noes in line with precedent that a tie on an amendment is broken in the direction of the Bill as originally introduced. (It subsequently turned out that the tellers had counted one extra MP as voting Aye and the result was actually 298 to 300, but that is not particularly relevant)
The point for the mention is not that Galloway's absence actually deprived the opposition of the chance to defeat the government, but that following the vote, many people said that it did. Given the high profile which Galloway gave to this aspect of politics, it was not surprising that his absence was particularly noteworthy. | Talk |
1 | Elizabeth is a stupid hoe |
0 | "
Your submission at Articles for creation
Mark Morgan (producer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. .
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
" |
0 | UNBLOCK ME ON .ES NOW! |
0 | Question
I'm planning to push Natalee Holloway for Today's Featured Article on October 21, which would be (or is) her 22nd birthday. They are instituting a bonus point in the evaluation process if the requestor is both a primary contributor to the article and has never been a primary contributor to a TFA article. Would you qualify? I don't because of my involvement with the article on the Borat movie, which was TFA last year. |
0 | B_Verkin_Institute_for_Low_Temperature_Physics_and_Engineering
Jeez man, give me a few minutes before you nuke the page Lolz.
I'm in the middle of building B_Verkin_Institute_for_Low_Temperature_Physics_and_Engineering. We had 5 articles redlinking it, all trying to use different spellings. I unified those links. I saw another half dozen articles mentioning it, that could be linking it. I decided to pull over the Russian copy of the article. How about you pull off the deletion tag and check back in an hour or two? |
0 | Hey, just because you think Braveheart is gospel, doesn't make Edward II the way Hollywood portrayed him. What type of scholarship is this?? 17:20, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
0 | February 2013 (UTC)
Feedback
Hello! I found these pages that talks about public broadcasting in all different areas and I thought it may be helpful for you!
Public broadcasting
Social media
Internet
This last page even mentions information with Politics and Arab Spring
I think it would be good to have a thesis statement because you have a lot of good ideas but it may be hard to connect them without having a specific direction if that makes sense.
Hope this helps!
05:43, 22 |
0 | "
Thanks. '''' MICHAEL Q.'' " |
0 | I combined the articles. Feel free to take a look if you like to make sure I didn't miss anything. I cut down a bit on the US House races since that is covered in the main article. I am going to write a state legislative election article as well and I will probably move some of the info to that article to keep this article from getting too huge. |
0 | I don't know to be honest. I'm only fully researching the chapel in the last two or three weeks, and I'm not yet up to date on the sources. I'm toying with the idea of tackling the main chapel article, but it seems daunting. Modernist is suggesting that the ceiling might be a more manageable
subject on the first outing, and maybe s/he is right. Either way, I'm only skirting around the chapel for the moment, and maybe my edit was a bit hasty. If so I apologise. |
1 | dear stuttering, self-righteous, self-absorbed, insignificant little puke,
WHEN I WANT YOUR FUCKING OPINION I'LL GIVE IT TO YOU.
UNTIL THEN, SHUT YOUR FUCKING SEWER AND KEEP SUCKING OBAMA'S COCK! |
1 | YOU ARE FUCKING CALLING MY TALKING ON MY OWN FUCKING TALK PAGE VANDALISM AND REVERTING IT SO I DON'T GET A SAY IN THIS WHOLE FUCKING BUSINESS!!!!! WHAT DO YOU EXPECT ME TO BE????? CALM????? YOU ARE CENSORING ME IN MY VERY OWN HOME BECAUSE YOU ARE ON SOME KIND OF POWER TRIP!!!!!!! THIS IS FUCKING UNBELIEVEABLE!!!!!!!! YES I WAS WRONG TO VANDALIZE AND WRONG TO TAKE OUT MY ANGER ON REDVERS, BUT AT LEAST THEN I HAD A FUCKING VOICE!!!!!!!!!! YOU ARE ACTING LIKE A FACIST!!!!!!!!!!!! STOP REVERTING MY COMMENTS ON MY OWN TALK PAGE!!!!!!!!! |
0 | (moved rest to unblock request) |
0 | It Is Obnoxious, Dangerous, Harmful to the Environment and Disruptive to Everyone in the Downtown Core
That previous version (props to whoever did them!) was bang on. Ask the experts. Ask people who live there.
Oh and congrats on all your numerous Wiki gold stars - you must be very proud Wikiscouts! You're really making a difference in the world! No wonder you sacrifice so much of what must be an otherwise fulfilling and exciting life to do this important work. History will remember you!
108.161.114.177 |
0 | Someone please update the box (i don't know how) then delete this section. Thank you. 86.10.119.131 |
0 | (you can see albanians too that are only 2 millions in the total,when there are much higher according to the sources used by editors) |
0 | link to chapter 291 cover
|
0 | "
File:Kid_Pix_1.0_About.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kid_Pix_1.0_About.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. " |
0 | As to June 2007
Please, avoid dropping offensive and uncivil comments on my talk page - like this one
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Independent State of Croatia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. | Talk |
0 | I notice that you everything you work on is related to Persians and other groups problems with those issues
May I ask you how you are an expert on such topics as scholars from the Middle East and their biographies or the Persian Gulf, and Kurds?
Oh, ya I also cited your statments about the fact that you wanted to cite that certain Muslim clerics have okayed sex with animals and children. How do you justify this statement and thought and even treat it like it could be true?
IN reply to you this is what I observe, alongside others....
These are your direct quotes on the Khoemini discussion page ;
I had seen some literature out there suggesting that Khomenini approved of sex with children and animals. Now someone has added some of these claims into this article. I'm not going to take them out, but the article is going to receive a dispute tag until these information are verified. AucamanTalk
Here is a direct quote from you to user:Pecher;
I've added some stuff about Khomeini's views on non-Muslims, but people might try to take them out. Could you keep an eye on that article as well? AucamanTalk
This is verified on user:Pecher's talk page.
What is all the interest you and Pecher have on Khoeimini and other Iranian clerics. Also your articles on Ahmadenajid all show a disturbing trend that you are trying to paint some sort of picture. It is like connect the dots.
Here are a list of articles you have worked on;
Human rights abuses by the Iraqi insurgency
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Israel
Controversies surrounding Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
International reactions to the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy
Opinions on the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy
Greater Middle East
Turkish Kurdistan
Major contributions
These are the pages you have made major edits to (or am working on right now):
People of Turkey
Kurdish people
Turkish people
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
Ayatollah Khomeini
Ayatollah Khamenei
Middle East
Wow human rights abuses in the Iraqi insurgency! Very odd and specific topic! Ahmadinejad and Israel! The Mohammed cartoons. All your edits really benefit in making Israel look good compared to the rest of the Middle East. Answer me this are you an Israeli citizen too? I think you are on an agenda. All your edits against Iranians (from Kurds to Persians,etc.) since Iran is seen as the biggest threat to Israel and all your other edits in the Arab fields. Also trying being a force in tension between Arab and Iranian and Turkish editors. All at the benefit of Israel. |
0 | "::Good morning to all those currently asleep. But according to the U.S. Constitution the president is not chosed until the Electoral college votes on it. Whis does not happed for the next month. This article is entitled ""List of Presidents of the United States,"" NOT ""List of President-elects of the United States"" or ""List of President and President-elects of the United States."" Go ahead and read the constitution if you don't believe me. One month to go, you never know if the president elects is going to die (somewhat like William Henry Harrison (albeit after swearing in) within weeks), or the electors get some mad spasm and vote wrongly from what is assigned. (electors have not always voted exactly as they were appointed to) At any rate, the point is, the vote for the presidency has technically not occurred yet.
" |
0 | )
No idea what you are talking about there sizzlechest! (talk |
1 | @ozzie_garza stfu bitch |
0 | I'm sorry sir for abusing and breaching the site rules, I thought those who were undoing my edits were not admins so I kept reverting them, I will not repeat this mistake ever again in the future and I will learn more about how Wikipedia works. So may I be unblocked and get a second and last chance? |
1 | This bitch arguing with my dad
|
0 | I know it's hardly surprising that C.Fred would once again butt in in areas about which he has no clue, but if he put his ego aside for a second and did some actual research, he might find the source of the entry and add it himself. (refer to paragraph 8) . Not to mention that these ladies were famous throughout Australia before Wikipedia was even a pipe dream.
You know Fred, some of would actually like to contribute to Wikipedia without being harassed. You should examine your motives and try to act like an adult. |
0 | Sir @ArvindKejriwal career tho apka waise bhi khatam ho chukka. You have become new Amar Singh so try for publicity |
0 | and prevent my speaking in my own defense against their fraudulent accusations on other pages |
1 | "
Don't tell me how to run my life asshole. -7 " |
0 | Odd, there seems to be two words added in your quote above that wasn't in your original edit. A mere oversight, I'm sure, and not an intentional misrepresentation of what you actually wrote. |
0 | "
Category:British anesthesiologists
:Category:British anesthesiologists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. ''''''TALK " |
0 | "
...Just like Ross and Lawler still say Monday Night Raw... 3:16 " |
0 | I know it's more like I don't appereciate it being butchered, even if it is gonna be butchered by some. 21:42, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC) |
0 | Mendelssohn NOT Jewish except by Nazi definition!
Mendelssohn may have had Jewish antecedents, but he was born into, baptized and brought up in a Lutheran family. He later became a Roman Catholic. At no stage in his life was he Jewish, nor did he ever identify himself as Jewish. Please see the discussion pages and don't revert my edits. He was defined as Jewish by the Nazi Party, because they made the innovation of treating Jews as a race, not a religious community. Up until the early 20th century German Jews were regarded correctly as Germans. For Wikipaedia to succumb to a racial or genetic definition of Jewishness is highly contentious. Please read the discussion page very carefully, and make up your mind, but for the time being leave the categories out. |
0 | REDIRECT Talk:Chapman's Regiment of Militia |
0 | "
Excellent. Sustainable development ought to be a given, in my opinion – making a little more money to today in exchange for future generations' very lives strikes me as the worst sort of greed and shortsightedness. But on to Wikipedia matters:
When including references to URLs, don't leave a space between the opening bracket and the website address. I've fixed two of these on the Irrigation in Peru article; your first assignment as my adoptee is to fix the third.
Also, be sure to sign your comments on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). I also encourage you to add a link to your talk page in your signature.
I look forward to working with you. I should be able to make more thorough comments about the Peruvian irrigation article later in the week. If I haven't gotten back to you with more feedback by Sunday, please drop me a line on my talk page. – • Tok " |
0 | Re: Your attempt to represent me on User talk:Afed
Very well! No more representation from me will you get. |
0 | Edit request on 3 March 2014 |
1 | ur so immature fr3nzi3,im 17 and ur not evn debating.ur a 6 year old baby and im like an adult,nobody likes you.anyway,everybody doesn't like any fat assholes like u.grown-ups fight like a man,i fight using words like swearin' like eminem dos in is songs.u don't evn have a brain,shit wat a crazy guy.
user:dark-hooded smoker |
0 | "==dont leave==
Wikipedia needs people like you. Remeber a time when there was no content on Hinduism in Indonesia, Gedong Bagus Oka and Parisada Hindu Dharma ? Remember a time when Category:Hindu politicians was a small struggling cat? Remember a time when Category:Hindu monarchs had no members, its thanks to us that these cats and these areas are encyclopedic now, and will continue to be down the road.man
indonesia
We should start working on the Indonesian articles again. Tokoh Indonesia is a good resource. See id:Pengguna:Tokohbaka. The good part is that Sanskrit derived words are ok in Indonesian, making it easy for us to contribute, and its in Latin script. Mostly I add Category:Tokoh Hindu to pages.man
I have something for you!
has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.
Image tagging for Image:Rwsage.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rwsage.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Wikipedia:Image use policy
Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
This is an automated notice by . For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Hindutva propaganda
What is your opinion on this, it's a phenomenon ripping Wikipedia apart from the seams, with fanatical supporters of Swami Vivekananda and his RSS revising history to make people believe lies. Think of all the children that enter Wikipedia and see this revisionist history and will need deprogramming in the future. I commend our maintsream admins. I support the neutrality and common non-OR sense of our admins. By the way, did you know that Swami Vivekananda himself used to write propaganda and publish it in Voice of India. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.178.139.138 .
Christianity in Myanmar
A content dispute is not vandalism. Grow up.
National stubs
Hi there,
Just a small suggestion: When you stubsort (such as you did in the article Hinduism in Tanzania), please include the national stub (Tanzania-stub in this case). Good work otherwise. Thanks
Religious Articles
You've tagged a lot of religious articles, particularly, but not limited to Catholic articles, for lack of notability. Some of these might have been taken from the Catholic Encyclopedia. What do you expect for reference material? Explanation of religious organization is fairly basic to society. The articles could be much better referenced, I suppose. Do you have a good example someplace of what you are looking for?
For example, you have tagged the first Catholic diocese in the US, Baltimore, for lacking notability. Are you just tagging American dioceses? I am interested in your thoughts here. Are you looking for lots of footnotes? External references?
Thanks. The Jesus Christ article can have |
1 | tricking off ya paper ain't wat u do... gotta learn the game... make dat hoe buy u!!!! |
Subsets and Splits