workspace
stringclasses 1
value | channel
stringclasses 1
value | sentences
stringlengths 1
3.93k
| ts
stringlengths 26
26
| user
stringlengths 2
11
| sentence_id
stringlengths 44
53
| timestamp
float64 1.5B
1.56B
| __index_level_0__
int64 0
106k
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pythondev | help | <https://xkcd.com/936/> | 2017-08-07T11:13:51.270568 | Antionette | pythondev_help_Antionette_2017-08-07T11:13:51.270568 | 1,502,104,431.270568 | 88,803 |
pythondev | help | what's good with passwordmeter is the list of common password | 2017-08-07T11:14:09.281516 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-08-07T11:14:09.281516 | 1,502,104,449.281516 | 88,804 |
pythondev | help | can't do that (easily) with regex | 2017-08-07T11:14:17.286369 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-08-07T11:14:17.286369 | 1,502,104,457.286369 | 88,805 |
pythondev | help | Good point | 2017-08-07T11:15:08.317369 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:15:08.317369 | 1,502,104,508.317369 | 88,806 |
pythondev | help | I wonder if I could dynamically add current username to that list | 2017-08-07T11:15:10.317990 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:15:10.317990 | 1,502,104,510.31799 | 88,807 |
pythondev | help | some users really don't care about themselves | 2017-08-07T11:15:20.324358 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:15:20.324358 | 1,502,104,520.324358 | 88,808 |
pythondev | help | I would make it a "rules" engine myself, test against the regex, test against the username, test against the first/last | 2017-08-07T11:15:32.332045 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:15:32.332045 | 1,502,104,532.332045 | 88,809 |
pythondev | help | Username: `tommyjones`
Password: `tommyjones1` -- strong | 2017-08-07T11:15:41.337162 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:15:41.337162 | 1,502,104,541.337162 | 88,810 |
pythondev | help | test that it's not in the top 100 most common | 2017-08-07T11:15:43.338539 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:15:43.338539 | 1,502,104,543.338539 | 88,811 |
pythondev | help | best solution is auto generate password and don't authorise to change (or only regeneration) :smile: | 2017-08-07T11:16:37.371251 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-08-07T11:16:37.371251 | 1,502,104,597.371251 | 88,812 |
pythondev | help | Or no password and only biometrics | 2017-08-07T11:17:13.392760 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:17:13.392760 | 1,502,104,633.39276 | 88,813 |
pythondev | help | not letting users mess with passwords? I love it | 2017-08-07T11:17:52.416454 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:17:52.416454 | 1,502,104,672.416454 | 88,814 |
pythondev | help | If you haven't seen it, NIST recently revised a lot of their password advice, some of the old wisdom seems no longer applies... Troy Hunt had a great writeup on it here <https://www.troyhunt.com/passwords-evolved-authentication-guidance-for-the-modern-era/> | 2017-08-07T11:18:06.424317 | Kenna | pythondev_help_Kenna_2017-08-07T11:18:06.424317 | 1,502,104,686.424317 | 88,815 |
pythondev | help | The TL;DR was something like:
- Stop requiring periodic password changes
- Stop requiring specific formulas of what's okay to use
- Longer is always better and the best way to make passwords strong | 2017-08-07T11:19:03.458383 | Kenna | pythondev_help_Kenna_2017-08-07T11:19:03.458383 | 1,502,104,743.458383 | 88,816 |
pythondev | help | > - Longer is always better | 2017-08-07T11:19:27.472207 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:19:27.472207 | 1,502,104,767.472207 | 88,817 |
pythondev | help | that's what she... | 2017-08-07T11:19:30.473765 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:19:30.473765 | 1,502,104,770.473765 | 88,818 |
pythondev | help | yup and the haveibeenpwned api seems like a very useful tool | 2017-08-07T11:19:31.474421 | Tandra | pythondev_help_Tandra_2017-08-07T11:19:31.474421 | 1,502,104,771.474421 | 88,819 |
pythondev | help | Related is Jeff Atwood's: <https://blog.codinghorror.com/password-rules-are-bullshit/> | 2017-08-07T11:19:37.478377 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:19:37.478377 | 1,502,104,777.478377 | 88,820 |
pythondev | help | specific formulas are no-go, alright, but what about suggestions? | 2017-08-07T11:20:03.493272 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:20:03.493272 | 1,502,104,803.493272 | 88,821 |
pythondev | help | I'm leery of the whole emojis in passwords thing, but maybe I'm just old and emoji newfangled :wink: | 2017-08-07T11:20:09.497323 | Kenna | pythondev_help_Kenna_2017-08-07T11:20:09.497323 | 1,502,104,809.497323 | 88,822 |
pythondev | help | like, "your password is rated 0.38 (or just "weak"), and most common ways to impove it are: ..." | 2017-08-07T11:20:33.511117 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:20:33.511117 | 1,502,104,833.511117 | 88,823 |
pythondev | help | and make a suggestion to add numbers, symbols, increase length. But no checking for specifics, just for a resulting entropy | 2017-08-07T11:21:14.536448 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:21:14.536448 | 1,502,104,874.536448 | 88,824 |
pythondev | help | <@Suellen> I think the observation was that if you specify a formula, you're telling crackers the formula too. And since humans tend to work similarly it actually gives them a leg up. People tend to put capitals at the start. They tend to put "special symbols" and numbers at the end. Etc. If you just leave it free form then it is less likely those predictable patterns emerge | 2017-08-07T11:21:25.543170 | Kenna | pythondev_help_Kenna_2017-08-07T11:21:25.543170 | 1,502,104,885.54317 | 88,825 |
pythondev | help | oh | 2017-08-07T11:21:55.560516 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:21:55.560516 | 1,502,104,915.560516 | 88,826 |
pythondev | help | And they swap in numerals for letters sometimes -> `Password1` -> `P4ssword1` | 2017-08-07T11:22:16.572975 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:22:16.572975 | 1,502,104,936.572975 | 88,827 |
pythondev | help | yeah, that makes sense, and that's exactly what I've been doing before keepass | 2017-08-07T11:22:25.578361 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:22:25.578361 | 1,502,104,945.578361 | 88,828 |
pythondev | help | The lookups are simple, lots of rainbow tables do that | 2017-08-07T11:22:27.579221 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:22:27.579221 | 1,502,104,947.579221 | 88,829 |
pythondev | help | But basically, require a length. For normal users discourse does 10char, for admins 15char | 2017-08-07T11:22:51.593916 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:22:51.593916 | 1,502,104,971.593916 | 88,830 |
pythondev | help | Where if you make the length arbitrary and encourage longer passwords, it adds a lot of cracking time. The NIST recommendation was to support up to either 128 or 256 char passwords I believe. It specified a minimum of 8, which IMO is probably low, but it's aimed at the average user, so... | 2017-08-07T11:23:07.602967 | Kenna | pythondev_help_Kenna_2017-08-07T11:23:07.602967 | 1,502,104,987.602967 | 88,831 |
pythondev | help | and checking agains the 100,000 most common password | 2017-08-07T11:23:11.605155 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:23:11.605155 | 1,502,104,991.605155 | 88,832 |
pythondev | help | damn, 128 | 2017-08-07T11:23:55.632145 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:23:55.632145 | 1,502,105,035.632145 | 88,833 |
pythondev | help | It's weird that anyone thought it was a good idea to start demanding special characters, because most people are just going to add 1 of them to meet the requirement, whereas simply making the password longer by a few characters would have a stronger benefit with no effect on how easy it is to remember | 2017-08-07T11:24:05.637735 | Gabriele | pythondev_help_Gabriele_2017-08-07T11:24:05.637735 | 1,502,105,045.637735 | 88,834 |
pythondev | help | holy guacamole | 2017-08-07T11:24:07.639258 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:24:07.639258 | 1,502,105,047.639258 | 88,835 |
pythondev | help | 256 char passwords ? that require a password manager | 2017-08-07T11:24:48.663340 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-08-07T11:24:48.663340 | 1,502,105,088.66334 | 88,836 |
pythondev | help | If you want Jeff's suggestions (not the angry rant) -> start here: <https://blog.codinghorror.com/password-rules-are-bullshit/#1passwordrulesarebullshit> | 2017-08-07T11:24:50.664622 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:24:50.664622 | 1,502,105,090.664622 | 88,837 |
pythondev | help | which is by itself a security risk | 2017-08-07T11:24:55.668084 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-08-07T11:24:55.668084 | 1,502,105,095.668084 | 88,838 |
pythondev | help | I think the idea is _up to_ 256 characters. With most online web apps you can just use a varchar or equivalent | 2017-08-07T11:25:54.703409 | Gabriele | pythondev_help_Gabriele_2017-08-07T11:25:54.703409 | 1,502,105,154.703409 | 88,839 |
pythondev | help | good thing postgres doesn't enforce length on varchars | 2017-08-07T11:26:09.712175 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:26:09.712175 | 1,502,105,169.712175 | 88,840 |
pythondev | help | Basically:
1. Rules are dumb
2. Enforce a minimum unicode length (emoji -> 1 "character" in many length checkers... is the example)
3. Check against the common password (approx 30% of people have a password from the top 10,000)
4. Check of entropy
5. Check special cases (containing username, first, or last) | 2017-08-07T11:26:17.717072 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:26:17.717072 | 1,502,105,177.717072 | 88,841 |
pythondev | help | Just use TEXT with postgres :stuck_out_tongue: | 2017-08-07T11:26:29.724677 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:26:29.724677 | 1,502,105,189.724677 | 88,842 |
pythondev | help | <@Suellen> You hash the password so it gets down to a predictable, probably fixed, length anyway | 2017-08-07T11:26:45.735029 | Kenna | pythondev_help_Kenna_2017-08-07T11:26:45.735029 | 1,502,105,205.735029 | 88,843 |
pythondev | help | <https://stackoverflow.com/a/4849030/1584762> | 2017-08-07T11:26:47.736310 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:26:47.736310 | 1,502,105,207.73631 | 88,844 |
pythondev | help | I store password in JSONB :troll: | 2017-08-07T11:26:50.737700 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-08-07T11:26:50.737700 | 1,502,105,210.7377 | 88,845 |
pythondev | help | `varchar` without `max_length` is a `text` as far as pg is concerned | 2017-08-07T11:26:50.737882 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:26:50.737882 | 1,502,105,210.737882 | 88,846 |
pythondev | help | so that's good | 2017-08-07T11:26:56.741628 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:26:56.741628 | 1,502,105,216.741628 | 88,847 |
pythondev | help | > To sum it all up:
>
> char(n) – takes too much space when dealing with values shorter than n, and can lead to subtle errors because of adding trailing spaces, plus it is problematic to change the limit
> varchar(n) – it's problematic to change the limit in live environment
> varchar – just like text
> text – for me a winner – over (n) data types because it lacks their problems, and over varchar – because it has distinct name | 2017-08-07T11:27:36.765864 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:27:36.765864 | 1,502,105,256.765864 | 88,848 |
pythondev | help | although, why am I even talking about database types, when you shouldn't be storing them in the DB... let me get some more caffeine before I say anything else | 2017-08-07T11:27:53.775977 | Gabriele | pythondev_help_Gabriele_2017-08-07T11:27:53.775977 | 1,502,105,273.775977 | 88,849 |
pythondev | help | oh oh | 2017-08-07T11:28:19.792109 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:28:19.792109 | 1,502,105,299.792109 | 88,850 |
pythondev | help | <@Ciera> NSCS/GCHQ (UK) is officially recommending password managers now, also mentioned in Troy's post | 2017-08-07T11:28:36.802703 | Kenna | pythondev_help_Kenna_2017-08-07T11:28:36.802703 | 1,502,105,316.802703 | 88,851 |
pythondev | help | btw, since there's a great discussion going on: is bcrypt still good enough? | 2017-08-07T11:28:59.816484 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:28:59.816484 | 1,502,105,339.816484 | 88,852 |
pythondev | help | <@Kenna> because they have access to them ? :troll: | 2017-08-07T11:29:26.832567 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-08-07T11:29:26.832567 | 1,502,105,366.832567 | 88,853 |
pythondev | help | am sure they are good but it's still a problem if someone get access to it | 2017-08-07T11:29:52.848444 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-08-07T11:29:52.848444 | 1,502,105,392.848444 | 88,854 |
pythondev | help | Yes | 2017-08-07T11:30:09.858914 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:30:09.858914 | 1,502,105,409.858914 | 88,855 |
pythondev | help | (even more in companies where you can just do a dump before get fired / leaving) | 2017-08-07T11:30:13.861584 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-08-07T11:30:13.861584 | 1,502,105,413.861584 | 88,856 |
pythondev | help | <@Ciera> Lolz... but seriously my take is, if your adversary is a nation-state, you're probably doomed already... I ignore them and worry about the garden variety opponents... :slightly_smiling_face: | 2017-08-07T11:30:14.862115 | Kenna | pythondev_help_Kenna_2017-08-07T11:30:14.862115 | 1,502,105,414.862115 | 88,857 |
pythondev | help | `bcrypt` seems to be the standard still in most places | 2017-08-07T11:32:06.932475 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:32:06.932475 | 1,502,105,526.932475 | 88,858 |
pythondev | help | did you hear the sad story of scrypt? it's not the story infosec people would tell you... | 2017-08-07T11:33:07.970401 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:33:07.970401 | 1,502,105,587.970401 | 88,859 |
pythondev | help | what went on with scrypt? | 2017-08-07T11:37:57.148463 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-08-07T11:37:57.148463 | 1,502,105,877.148463 | 88,860 |
pythondev | help | it was invented and named "better bcrypt", but wasn't used much | 2017-08-07T11:41:03.258281 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:41:03.258281 | 1,502,106,063.258281 | 88,861 |
pythondev | help | and starting to use scrypt now wouldn't make much sense because of argon2 | 2017-08-07T11:41:38.278552 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:41:38.278552 | 1,502,106,098.278552 | 88,862 |
pythondev | help | I was just looking through the django docs on what they use by default - and they suggest argon2 as well | 2017-08-07T11:43:10.333444 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:43:10.333444 | 1,502,106,190.333444 | 88,863 |
pythondev | help | oh cool | 2017-08-07T11:43:45.354740 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:43:45.354740 | 1,502,106,225.35474 | 88,864 |
pythondev | help | wait, is there a python implementation / bindings? | 2017-08-07T11:44:02.364917 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:44:02.364917 | 1,502,106,242.364917 | 88,865 |
pythondev | help | I searched for it, but only found a lonely github repo and it wasn't updated much | 2017-08-07T11:44:58.398887 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:44:58.398887 | 1,502,106,298.398887 | 88,866 |
pythondev | help | `argon2_cffi` | 2017-08-07T11:45:25.415169 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:45:25.415169 | 1,502,106,325.415169 | 88,867 |
pythondev | help | Looks like that's the one they link to as well: <https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.11/topics/auth/passwords/#using-argon2-with-django> | 2017-08-07T11:46:58.470692 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:46:58.470692 | 1,502,106,418.470692 | 88,868 |
pythondev | help | must be good enough then | 2017-08-07T11:47:37.493716 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:47:37.493716 | 1,502,106,457.493716 | 88,869 |
pythondev | help | grrrreat | 2017-08-07T11:47:41.496064 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T11:47:41.496064 | 1,502,106,461.496064 | 88,870 |
pythondev | help | > . The Password Hashing Competition panel, however, recommends immediate use of Argon2 rather than the other algorithms supported by Django. | 2017-08-07T11:47:49.501023 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T11:47:49.501023 | 1,502,106,469.501023 | 88,871 |
pythondev | help | Saw the password stuff from earlier. So much of the web, and business, is doing passwords so wrong. If there is a length limitation it is scary, because length doesn't matter much if it is hashed anyway. | 2017-08-07T15:02:11.920167 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-08-07T15:02:11.920167 | 1,502,118,131.920167 | 88,872 |
pythondev | help | or you're dealing with a crappy legacy system | 2017-08-07T15:04:04.980438 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-08-07T15:04:04.980438 | 1,502,118,244.980438 | 88,873 |
pythondev | help | and/or clueless management | 2017-08-07T15:04:13.984780 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-08-07T15:04:13.984780 | 1,502,118,253.98478 | 88,874 |
pythondev | help | Length does matter with hashing, each additional character increases the hash entropy significantly - as far as I understand it | 2017-08-07T15:04:40.999380 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T15:04:40.999380 | 1,502,118,280.99938 | 88,875 |
pythondev | help | Sure the end hash is the same length | 2017-08-07T15:04:48.003836 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T15:04:48.003836 | 1,502,118,288.003836 | 88,876 |
pythondev | help | I meant with storage. | 2017-08-07T15:04:50.004693 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-08-07T15:04:50.004693 | 1,502,118,290.004693 | 88,877 |
pythondev | help | Ah | 2017-08-07T15:04:53.006175 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T15:04:53.006175 | 1,502,118,293.006175 | 88,878 |
pythondev | help | ok | 2017-08-07T15:04:53.006544 | Beula | pythondev_help_Beula_2017-08-07T15:04:53.006544 | 1,502,118,293.006544 | 88,879 |
pythondev | help | I want to be able to paste the text of the bible with emoji thrown in at random into a password field and have it work. :slightly_smiling_face: | 2017-08-07T15:05:12.016428 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-08-07T15:05:12.016428 | 1,502,118,312.016428 | 88,880 |
pythondev | help | emojis are a must nowadays | 2017-08-07T15:05:31.025887 | Suellen | pythondev_help_Suellen_2017-08-07T15:05:31.025887 | 1,502,118,331.025887 | 88,881 |
pythondev | help | I think KeePass can be set to generate passwords with ascii characters that aren't on a keyboard. | 2017-08-07T15:06:17.049300 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-08-07T15:06:17.049300 | 1,502,118,377.0493 | 88,882 |
pythondev | help | It refers to them as High ANSI, so not ascii, but close. | 2017-08-07T15:07:04.073211 | Meghan | pythondev_help_Meghan_2017-08-07T15:07:04.073211 | 1,502,118,424.073211 | 88,883 |
pythondev | help | Hi All, Does anyone know any course or training on python with facebook? I have been trying a lot, but I didnt get anything on it | 2017-08-07T22:01:16.564028 | Donnetta | pythondev_help_Donnetta_2017-08-07T22:01:16.564028 | 1,502,143,276.564028 | 88,884 |
pythondev | help | <@Donnetta>
> course or training on python with facebook
can you give an example of what you want to do? | 2017-08-07T23:13:32.358973 | Deedee | pythondev_help_Deedee_2017-08-07T23:13:32.358973 | 1,502,147,612.358973 | 88,885 |
pythondev | help | Hello, | 2017-08-07T23:46:26.685775 | Trudi | pythondev_help_Trudi_2017-08-07T23:46:26.685775 | 1,502,149,586.685775 | 88,886 |
pythondev | help | I'm new to the programming world and am wondering if anyone has any good python resources for new beginners? | 2017-08-07T23:48:32.706471 | Trudi | pythondev_help_Trudi_2017-08-07T23:48:32.706471 | 1,502,149,712.706471 | 88,887 |
pythondev | help | i would suggest: <https://www.udemy.com/complete-python-bootcamp/> | 2017-08-08T00:38:05.197989 | Donnetta | pythondev_help_Donnetta_2017-08-08T00:38:05.197989 | 1,502,152,685.197989 | 88,888 |
pythondev | help | I am new to “facebook with python”. My main intention is to delete/post photos and posts with a python script. I have been trying for this, but i m not successful. I was only able to read/get one post and it might be very difficult to get all posts in this manner reading one post by post. So thinking on a course or tutorial. | 2017-08-08T00:45:24.268375 | Donnetta | pythondev_help_Donnetta_2017-08-08T00:45:24.268375 | 1,502,153,124.268375 | 88,889 |
pythondev | help | <@Donnetta>, I suggest spending some time learning how to navigate the graph API. Facebook now has excellent documentation how to do this and they also have a graph explorer tool where you can directly query their server and view responses. | 2017-08-08T00:59:05.401242 | Winnifred | pythondev_help_Winnifred_2017-08-08T00:59:05.401242 | 1,502,153,945.401242 | 88,890 |
pythondev | help | <https://developers.facebook.com/docs/graph-api/using-graph-api/#deleting> | 2017-08-08T00:59:09.401874 | Winnifred | pythondev_help_Winnifred_2017-08-08T00:59:09.401874 | 1,502,153,949.401874 | 88,891 |
pythondev | help | <https://developers.facebook.com/docs/graph-api/using-graph-api/#reading> | 2017-08-08T00:59:18.403528 | Winnifred | pythondev_help_Winnifred_2017-08-08T00:59:18.403528 | 1,502,153,958.403528 | 88,892 |
pythondev | help | <https://developers.facebook.com/tools/explorer/> | 2017-08-08T00:59:37.406778 | Winnifred | pythondev_help_Winnifred_2017-08-08T00:59:37.406778 | 1,502,153,977.406778 | 88,893 |
pythondev | help | <@Winnifred> Thats what exactly i have been trying from the beginning, but in the links that you gave, there is nothing on python, how can I integrate those GET commands with python? | 2017-08-08T01:01:05.423071 | Donnetta | pythondev_help_Donnetta_2017-08-08T01:01:05.423071 | 1,502,154,065.423071 | 88,894 |
pythondev | help | You can construct the calls using <http://docs.python-requests.org/en/master/>. | 2017-08-08T01:02:28.437654 | Winnifred | pythondev_help_Winnifred_2017-08-08T01:02:28.437654 | 1,502,154,148.437654 | 88,895 |
pythondev | help | There is `requests` package BTW | 2017-08-08T01:02:34.438653 | Shelly | pythondev_help_Shelly_2017-08-08T01:02:34.438653 | 1,502,154,154.438653 | 88,896 |
pythondev | help | <@Winnifred> this should help.. i will give it a try. <@Shelly> thank you. I will look on it too.. Thank you both. | 2017-08-08T01:04:08.454379 | Donnetta | pythondev_help_Donnetta_2017-08-08T01:04:08.454379 | 1,502,154,248.454379 | 88,897 |
pythondev | help | There is a little bit of a learning curve on how to use `requests`, but if you use the URL structure in the facebook docs and supply the right auth credentials, you should be able to `GET` and `POST` just fine. | 2017-08-08T01:05:34.469107 | Winnifred | pythondev_help_Winnifred_2017-08-08T01:05:34.469107 | 1,502,154,334.469107 | 88,898 |
pythondev | help | who want to practice coding in hackerrank ? | 2017-08-08T07:14:19.039476 | Gala | pythondev_help_Gala_2017-08-08T07:14:19.039476 | 1,502,176,459.039476 | 88,899 |
pythondev | help | I am facing one problem on Django framework that is In Django Models i want id is Autofilled but i don't want primary_key any one help me how to fix it | 2017-08-08T07:51:46.733057 | Verlie | pythondev_help_Verlie_2017-08-08T07:51:46.733057 | 1,502,178,706.733057 | 88,900 |
pythondev | help | <@Verlie> you should post this in <#C0LMFRMB5|django> but the answer is primary_key=False | 2017-08-08T07:53:04.757581 | Tandra | pythondev_help_Tandra_2017-08-08T07:53:04.757581 | 1,502,178,784.757581 | 88,901 |
pythondev | help | but i put primary_key is Flase it rise exception Autofilled must have primary_key = True | 2017-08-08T07:53:54.773599 | Verlie | pythondev_help_Verlie_2017-08-08T07:53:54.773599 | 1,502,178,834.773599 | 88,902 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.