text
stringlengths 0
80
|
---|
to locate the collected/classified data. Each one of this
|
information is a different continuous time series. A sampling rate
|
of 100 Hz was used for each time series. It is important to note
|
that the Android system does not guarantee a perfect precision on
|
the interval between readings. This means that when we choose a
|
sampling rate of 100 Hz, the device should output between 95 and
|
105 observations per second.
|
For this data, the (X,Y,Z) acceleration time series are treated as
|
separate dimensions. There is a univariate version in the archive
|
also.
|
In order to obtain labeled data, the Asfault application allows the
|
expert to inform the pavement condition before collecting the data.
|
To guarantee the integrity of data, Asfault also records videos of
|
the road over the data collection using the built-in camera. Thus,
|
it is possible to perform the analysis of these videos to confirm
|
the class labels assigned by the expert.
|
The datasets were collected in the Brazilian cities of Sao Carlos,
|
Ribeirao Preto, Araraquara, and Maringa using a medium sized
|
hatchback car (Hyundai i30) and two different devices (Samsung
|
Galaxy A5 and Samsung S7).
|
The problem AsphaltRegularity has two classes based on the comfort
|
felt by the driver according to the condition of the pavement was
|
considered. Regular: when the pavement is regular and the driver
|
comfort is very little changed over time;
|
Deteriorated: when is observed some irregularities and roughness in
|
a deteriorated pavement that are responsible for transferring
|
vibrations to the cabin of the vehicle, reducing the comfort of the
|
driver.
|
There are 1502 cases: regular (762) and Deteriorated (740 cases).
|
Data is variable length, minimum 66 observations, maximum 4201. The
|
data is split randomly into 50/50 default train series. The data
|
can be resampled without bias.
|
The best reported accuracy using combining rules with the XYZ data
|
was achieved by the distance measure LCSS combined with the
|
Complexity Invariant Distance (CID-LCSS) which achieved 98.48\%
|
accuracy (measured with a 5x2 CV). See Table 5 in [1]
|
The best reported accuracy with this univariate data was achieved
|
by the distance measure LCSS combined with the Complexity Invariant
|
Distance (CID-LCSS) which achieved 96.48\% accuracy (measured with
|
a 5x2 CV, see Table 5 of [1]).
|
[1] Souza V.M.A. Asphalt pavement classification using smartphone
|
accelerometer and Complexity Invariant Distance. Engineering
|
Applications of Artificial Intelligence Volume 74, pp. 198-211.
|
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197618301349
|
[2] Souza V.M.A., Cherman E.A., Rossi R.G., Souza R.A. Towards
|
automatic evaluation of asphalt irregularity using smartphones
|
sensors International Symposium on Intelligent Data Analysis
|
(2017), pp. 322-333
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.