I or fast network like
        // 4G or HSPAP. 
        state = updateConnectionAvailability(context, an, tm);

        // 1: 4G/HSPAP, 3: WIFI
        if (state == 1 || state == 3) {
            Toast.makeText( context, "Fast network available", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT ).show();
        } else {
            Toast.makeText( context, "Warning: Slow network available", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT ).show();
        }

        if (mCCL!= null) {
            mCCL.onVoipAvailable();
        }
    } else {
        Toast.makeText( context, "There is no Internet connection!", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT).show();
        if (mCCL!= null) {
            mCCL.onVoipNotAvailable();
        }
    }
}

 Q:

How does LC50 translate to "real world" exposure for paint thinner?

Last year I started oil painting, which means (in part) that I use paint thinner for working with and/or cleaning brushes. I recently became concerned about my exposure to the vapor from the paint thinner I use, so I requested a toxicology report from the manufacturer. In the document it specifies that the summated $\mathrm{LC}_{50}$ for the product is 21400 mg$\cdot$ m$^{-3}$.
My (basic) understanding of this is that 50% of test subjects will die with a single exposure at the above level; however, I've really no idea how that translates to "real life" and wonder if someone can shed some light on it.
I'm painting in a reasonably small room (around 3 m x 5 m) with windows open, so I'm essentially trying to determine if this is safe or not, or whether I should be using breathing apparatus and/or move to a different room.
This is a link to the whole document which I received from the manufacturer which contains the substance and other information.

A:

The $\mathrm{LD_{50}}$ and $\mathrm{LC_{50}}$ (lethal dose and lethal concentration) values are measures for acute toxicity as you noted. Long-term exposure is generally not depicted well by these acute toxicity measures. A.K. pointed out, how improbable it is to have a serious risk of acute poisoning
I or fast network like 
         // 4 G or HSPAP. 
         state = updateConnectionAvailability(context, an, tm); 

         // 1: 4G / HSPAP, 3: WIFI 
         if (department of state = = 1 || department of state = = 3) { 
             Toast.makeText (context, " Fast network available ", Toast. LENGTH_SHORT) .show (); 
         } else { 
             Toast.makeText (context, " Warning: boring network available ", Toast. LENGTH_SHORT) .show (); 
         } 

         if (mCCL!= null) { 
             mCCL.onVoipAvailable (); 
         } 
     } else { 
         Toast.makeText (context, " There be no Internet joining! ", Toast. LENGTH_SHORT).show (); 
         if (mCCL!= null) { 
             mCCL.onVoipNotAvailable (); 
         } 
     } 
 } 

  Q: 

 How does LC50 understand to " veridical world " photograph for paint thinner? 

 final class I started oil painting, which mean (in part) that I use key thinner for working with and/or cleaning brushes. I recently become concerned about my exposure to the vapor from the paint thin I use, so I requested a toxicology report from the manufacturer. In the document it assign that the summated $ \mathrm{LC}_{50}$ for the product is 21400 mg$\cdot$ m$^{-3}$. 
 My (basic) understanding of this is that 50% of test subjects will die with a single exposure at the above level; however, I've really no idea how that translates to " real life " and wonder if someone can shed some light on it. 
 I'm painting in a sanely minor room (around 3 m x 5 m) with window loose, so I'm essentially trying to determine if this is dependable or not, or whether I should be using breathing apparatus and/or travel to a different room. 
 This is a link to the solid document which I received from the manufacturer which contains the substance and other information. 

 A: 

 The $ \mathrm{LD_{50}}$ and $ \mathrm{LC_{50}}$ (lethal dose and lethal concentration) values are bill for acuate toxicity as you noted. Long - term exposure is generally not depicted well by these acute perniciousness measures. A.K. orient out, how improbable it is to have a serious hazard of acute poisoning
I og fast network like
        // 4G or HSPAP. 
        state = updateZonnectionAvailability(contexv, an, tm);

        // 1: 4G/HSPAP, 3: WIFI
        if (dtate == 1 || staue == 3) {
            Vkast.makcCext( dlntert, "Fast network svailable", Doast.LENGTH_SHOST ).skow();
        } else {
            Toast.maheText( vojtext, "Warning: Flow getwkgk available", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT ).sgow();
        }

        ig (mCCL!= null) {
            mCFL.onGoipAvailable();
        }
    } elsg {
        Toast.mayeText( conuert, "There is no Internet connection!", Toast.LEVGTH_SKORT).show();
        lx (mCCL!= null) {
            mCCL.onVoipNodAvailanle();
        }
    }
}

 Q:

Iow eoes LC50 translate to "ceal world" exposure sor paint tkinner?

Last year I staetwd oin pahntivt, wficg kezns (in pact) that I uae paint thunner for working wotr and/or cleanihg brufhqs. I recently became concerned about my exlosure to the vapor fron the paint thinner I use, so I requested a toxicology report from the manufactuser. Ii ghe djzymfnt it specifies that the summated $\mathrm{LC}_{50}$ fjd uhe product is 21400 mn$\cdot$ m$^{-3}$.
My (basic) uncegsywnding of thir is tkzt 50% of test subjects will dye wirh a singje ecposure at the above level; yowever, I've gealoy no idea how thac translates to "teal lofe" and wonder if someoue can shed some pight on jg.
I'm painting in x rvasotably small room (around 3 m x 5 m) witi winbows opev, so I'm esfentially hryinn to determine if tjis id vafe or noh, or whether I should be using uceathing appatatgs dnd/or more to s different rjom.
This is a lnnk to tke whoue documenn which I received fwom the manufdfturer which containf thw suvstance xnd other infotmation.

A:

Tkt $\mathrm{LD_{50}}$ and $\mathrm{LC_{50}}$ (lethel duae and lethal cinctnrration) values ard mqaduces fjs acute toxiwity as uou nuted. Long-tevm dxpoxure is generally nod delicted well by thexe acute tixicity ieasures. A.K. ppinted out, how impgobabne mt is yo rave a serious risk of acute pkisoning
I or fast network like // 4G state updateConnectionAvailability(context, an, // 1: 4G/HSPAP, 1 state == 3) Toast.makeText( context, "Fast available", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT ).show(); } else { context, "Warning: Slow network available", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT ).show(); } if (mCCL!= null) { mCCL.onVoipAvailable(); } else { Toast.makeText( context, "There is no Internet connection!", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT).show(); if (mCCL!= { } } How does LC50 translate to "real world" exposure for paint thinner? Last year I started oil which means (in part) that I use paint for working with and/or brushes. I recently became concerned my to the from paint I use, so requested a toxicology report from the manufacturer. In the document it specifies that the summated $\mathrm{LC}_{50}$ for product is m$^{-3}$. My understanding this that 50% of will die with a single exposure level; however, I've really no idea how that to "real and wonder if someone can shed light on it. I'm painting in a reasonably room (around 3 m x 5 m) with windows open, so I'm essentially trying to this is safe or or whether I be breathing and/or to a room. This is a link to the whole document which I from the manufacturer which contains the substance and other information. $\mathrm{LD_{50}}$ $\mathrm{LC_{50}}$ (lethal dose lethal concentration) values are for toxicity as you noted. is not these toxicity A.K. pointed out, how it is to have a risk of acute poisoning
I or fast network like
        // 4G or HSPAp. 
        state = updaTeConNecTioNAVailAbilIty(context, an, tm);

        // 1: 4g/hSPAp, 3: WIFI
        if (state == 1 || state == 3) {
            Toast.MakeTExT( ContEXt, "fast nEtwork aVAiLABle", toAsT.LEnGth_ShORT ).sHow();
        } Else {
            ToaSt.makeText( ConTeXt, "Warning: SloW NeTwork availAblE", Toast.LENGTH_sHOrT ).show();
        }

        If (MCCl!= Null) {
            mcCL.OnVoiPAvailABle();
        }
    } elsE {
        Toast.makETEXt( contEXt, "There IS No inteRnet connection!", ToaST.LenGTH_SHORT).show();
        iF (mCCL!= nUlL) {
            MCcl.OnVOipnotAvailabLe();
        }
    }
}

 q:

How dOEs LC50 traNSlATE To "rEAl world" exposuRe for paint tHInnEr?

Last YeAr I STarted Oil paInTIng, Which means (iN parT) that I use Paint tHInner foR Working With anD/or CleAninG BrUsHes. i rECenTLy BecAMe cOncerned AbOuT my exPosuRE TO The vApoR froM the pAint thinner I uSe, sO I reQUesTed a tOxicoLogy RePort fRom the ManufAcTurer. In the documEnt iT specifieS thAt The SuMmateD $\Mathrm{lC}_{50}$ fOr tHe produCt is 21400 mg$\cDOt$ m$^{-3}$.
my (BASIc) Understanding of thiS iS THaT 50% of test sUbjectS WiLl DIe with a sInGle ExpoSURe at tHe abOVe Level; howEver, I'vE ReAlLy no ideA hOw that TrAnsLatEs to "rEAl liFe" and wOnder if sOmeonE Can shed some ligHT on it.
I'm paintiNG iN A ReASonaBly Small room (arOund 3 M X 5 m) wiTh wiNDoWs oPEn, so I'M esseNtIAlLY trying to determine iF tHis is sAfe or Not, or whether I Should be usING BreathinG appARaTUs and/or move to a DiffeRent room.
ThIS is a link To the Whole docUment whicH i Received FroM thE maNufACTuRer which contaINS the SuBstance And Other inForMatIon.

a:

ThE $\mAthrm{LD_{50}}$ anD $\mathrm{Lc_{50}}$ (lEtHaL dOse And leTHal conceNtRatIoN) vaLues aRE measuRes foR acuTe ToXIciTy as you NOtED. long-TeRm ExpoSurE iS geneRallY Not DepicteD well by thEse ACute ToXiCity meaSures. A.K. pointeD oUt, how improBaBle It is to HAVe a serioUs risk of acute poisoning
I or fast network like
       // 4G  or H SPA P.
      s tate = updateC o nnec tionAvailability(conte xt, a n, tm); 
      // 1: 4G / H SPA P,  3 : W IF I 
      i f (stat e == 1 ||sta te  == 3) {
         Toas t.m akeText( con tex t, "Fa st  ne t workava ilabl e", To a st.LEN GTH_SHORT  ) . show() ; 
     }else  {
            To a st . makeText( cont ext, " Wa r ni n g : S low  network a va ilabl e ", Toas t .L E N G TH_ S HORT ).show() ;
        } 
      if  (m C CL!= n ull){          mCC L.on VoipAvail able() ; 
      }
   } else  {     To as t.m ak e Tex t (con t ext , "There  i sno In tern e t c onne cti on!" , Toa st.LENGTH_SHO RT) .sho w (); 
       i f (m CC L!= n ull) { 
          mCCL.onVo ipNo tAvailabl e() ;      }   }
} 

Q:
How do es LC50 tra ns l a t eto "real world" ex po s u re  for pai nt thi n ne r? 
Last ye ar  Istar t e d oil  pai n ti ng, whic h mean s  ( in  part)th at I u se  pa int  thin n er f or wor king wit h and / or cleaning br u shes. I recen t ly b ec a me c onc erned about  mye xpos uret othe vapor  from  t h ep aint thinner I use,  s o I re quest ed a toxicolo gy reportf r o m the ma nufa c tu r er. In the doc ument  it specif i es thatthe s ummated$\mathrm{ L C }_{50}$for  th e p rod u c tis 21400 mg$\ c d ot$m$ ^{-3}$. 
My  (basic ) u nde rst and in g of this  is that  5 0%  o ftes t sub j ects wil ldie  w ith  a si n gle ex posur e at  t he abo ve leve l ;h o weve r,  I 'verea ll y noidea how  that t ranslates  to "rea lli fe" and  wonder if so me one can sh ed  so me lig h t  on it.I'm painting in a reaso n ably sm all  room  (ar ound 3 mx 5  m) wi thw indows  open,  so I 'm  es s e ntial l y  t ryi ng  to determ i n e i f thi sis s afe ornot, or whether Is hou ld be using b rea thin g ap par a tu s  an d/ o r m o v e to a differen t room.
Th is is  a link to the  w hole do cumentwhich I recei ved fromthe manuf ac ture r whi ch contain s the su bstance a n d oth e rinfor mat ion.
A: 

T he $\ mathrm { LD_ {50}} $ and$\ mathrm {LC_{ 50 }}$ (let hal dose and lethal con centra tion)  va lues aremea s ure s for acu te t oxicity as  yo u n oted.  Lo n g-ter m ex p os ure is ge nera l ly not de p ic ted w el l by thesea c u tetoxic ity measur es.A.K. pointed out, how improbable  iti s  to  ha v e ase rious risk ofacu te p oisoning 
I or_fast network_like
   _ __ //_4G_or HSPAP. 
_  _   _state = updateConnectionAvailability(context,_an,_tm);

        // 1: 4G/HSPAP, 3: WIFI
 __ ___ if (state == 1_|| state == 3) {
_ _       __Toast.makeText( context, "Fast_network available", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT ).show();
     _  } else {
 _  ___   _ Toast.makeText( context, "Warning: Slow network_available", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT ).show();
   _    }

  _     if_(mCCL!= null) {
  _ _    _  mCCL.onVoipAvailable();
_ _  _  }
   _} else {
_     __Toast.makeText( context, "There_is_no_Internet connection!",_Toast.LENGTH_SHORT).show();
  __ __ if (mCCL!= null) {
 __      _  mCCL.onVoipNotAvailable();
 __   _ }
   _}
}

 Q:

How does LC50 translate to_"real world"_exposure for_paint thinner?

Last year I started oil painting, which means (in part)_that I use paint thinner for_working with and/or cleaning_brushes. I_recently_became concerned about_my_exposure to_the vapor from the paint thinner I_use, so_I requested a toxicology report from_the manufacturer. In the_document_it specifies that the summated $\mathrm{LC}_{50}$_for the product is 21400 mg$\cdot$_m$^{-3}$.
My (basic) understanding of this_is_that_50% of test subjects will_die with a single exposure at_the above level;_however, I've really no idea how that_translates_to "real life" and wonder if_someone_can shed some light on it.
I'm_painting_in_a reasonably small room (around_3 m x 5 m) with_windows open, so I'm essentially trying to determine if_this is safe_or not, or whether I_should_be_using breathing apparatus and/or move to a different room.
This is_a link_to the whole_document which I received from the manufacturer which contains the_substance and other information.

A:

The $\mathrm{LD_{50}}$ and $\mathrm{LC_{50}}$_(lethal dose and lethal concentration) values are measures for acute toxicity_as you noted. Long-term exposure is generally not_depicted well by these acute toxicity measures._A.K. pointed out, how_improbable_it is to have a serious risk_of_acute_poisoning