
I want to get a pair of 26 x 2.1  tires for my Bicycle.
My wheels are compatible with these dimensions.
A reputable store near me offers 26x1.95 tires. I am pretty sure that 1.95s are compatible with my 2.1 wheel.
The issue is, these are marketed at tires for a single speed bicycle of theirs. Mine is a 21 (3 x 7) speed bike.
From what I can tell, the wheel matters in matters of compatibility with the gearing, and not the tires as long as it is compatible with my wheel. But still, to be extra sure, does it matter that these tires are marketed for single-speed cycles as long as they are compatible with my wheels?

A:

The amount of gears has no bearing on the type of tyre. 
The 26" part refers to the wheel diameter, so this is the most important part. 
The 2.1" or 1.95", refer to the width of the tyre. The width of the rim determine which width tyres you should have. If your wheel is ok wth a 2.1 wide tyre, then a 1.95" wide tyre will be absolutely fine. 
What you should consider when changing a tyre is the terrain, the puncture protection level, the weight, the durability vs grip and the price. The bike gears alone shouldn't influence the tyre choice. 

 Q:

Error in 'a.out': free(): invalid next size (normal)

I'm writing a big application and i recently included there my new module for working with files. It has simple functions of writing integers and strings, it was tested to be perfect on Red Hat. It does exactly what i want.
Here's the implementation of the functions there:
int CFile_open(CFile* owner, char* filename, char* mode) {
    owner->file = fopen(filename, mode);
    if (owner->file == NULL) {
        return 0;
    } else {
        return 1;
    }
}

int CFile_close(CFile* owner) {
    if (owner->file == NULL) {
        return 0;
    } else {
        if (fclose(owner->file) ) {
            return 1;
        } else {
            return 0;

I want to get a pair of 26 x 2.1   tires for my Bicycle. 
 My wheel are compatible with these dimension. 
 A reputable store near me offers 26x1.95 tires. I am reasonably sure that 1.95s are compatible with my 2.1 wheel. 
 The issue is, these are market at tires for a single focal ratio bicycle of theirs. Mine is a 21 (3 x 7) speed bike. 
 From what I can distinguish, the wheel matters in matter of compatibility with the gearing, and not the tire as long as it is compatible with my wheel. But however, to be extra sure, does it matter that these tire are marketed for single - speed cycle as long as they are compatible with my wheels? 

 A: 

 The sum of gears have no bearing on the type of tyre. 
 The 26 " part refers to the wheel diameter, so this is the about important part. 
 The 2.1 " or 1.95 ", refer to the width of the tyre. The width of the rim determine which width tyres you should accept. If your wheel is ok wth a 2.1 wide tyre, then a 1.95 " wide tyre will be absolutely fine. 
 What you should consider when changing a tyre is the terrain, the puncture protection level, the system of weights, the durability vs grip and the monetary value. The motorcycle gear alone shouldn't influence the tyre option. 

  Q: 

 Error in' a.out': spare (): invalid next size (normal) 

 I'm writing a boastful application and i recently included there my new module for working with files. It accept simple functions of writing integers and string, it was test to be perfect on Red Hat. It does exactly what i want. 
 Here's the implementation of the routine there: 
 int CFile_open(CFile * owner, char * filename, char * mode) { 
     owner->file = fopen(filename, mode); 
     if (owner->file = = NULL) { 
         return 0; 
     } else { 
         recurrence 1; 
     } 
 } 

 int CFile_close(CFile * owner) { 
     if (owner->file = = NULL) { 
         return 0; 
     } else { 
         if (fclose(owner->file) ) { 
             return 1; 
         } else { 
             return 0;

I wwnt to get a pair of 26 x 2.1  tires for my Yucycle.
Ky whesls are zompatible with these dimensmons.
Q repytable store near me owfers 26x1.95 tpres. I am preuty sure that 1.95s acs compabnble slth mv 2.1 wheel.
The issug is, these ase marketed at tkrzs for a single speed bicycle of theyrs. Minr ls a 21 (3 x 7) speeq bilq.
Froj what I can tell, the wheel mattera in mauters of compatibikity with the gearing, and jot hhe tires as long ws it is conpatyvle with my dheel. But still, to be gxtra sure, does it matter that tfese cires are mqrjetfg for singlx-speed cycles as long as tvey are compatible wibh my whwels?

A:

The amount of geers has no bearing og the typa kf tyre. 
The 26" part rwfers to dhe dyeeu djakefer, so thms is the mkst importabt part. 
The 2.1" or 1.95", regew to the width of thq eyre. The width of the rim determine whibh wjdth tyres you should hqve. If your wheel is lk wth a 2.1 wide tyre, then a 1.95" wide tyre will be absolutely fhne. 
Wiag yiu ryokld consider when changing a tyre is the terrwjn, tme puncture protcction level, the wrihhy, the durabilijy vs gxjp and the price. The bike ggars aoone shoujdn't influence the tyre choice. 

 Q:

Error in 'a.jyt': free(): invalid nert size (normcl)

I'm wtiting a big application and n recehtly includfd there jh new module for wogkinc with files. It has simple functionw of writine injegers wnd stringd, it was tested to be pegfect ot Red Hat. Lt does exactly what i want.
Here's the implemenjathon of the yunctipns there:
int SFile_open(CFile* owner, ehar* fklename, chzr* mode) {
    owner->fyle = fopen(filajame, mode);
    if (ownew->filw == NYLL) {
        return 0;
    } else {
        retuen 1;
    }
}

int CFile_clpse(ZRile* owner) {
    ny (iwner->file == NULL) {
        rxturn 0;
    } else {
        iw (fclore(owner->file) ) {
            return 1;
        } else {
            teburn 0;

I want to get a pair of 2.1 for my My wheels are reputable near me offers tires. I am sure that 1.95s are compatible with 2.1 wheel. The issue is, these are marketed at tires for a single bicycle of theirs. Mine is a 21 (3 x 7) speed bike. From I tell, wheel in matters of compatibility with the gearing, and not the tires as long as it is with my wheel. But still, to be extra does it matter that tires are marketed for single-speed as as they compatible my A: The amount gears has no bearing on the type of tyre. The 26" part refers to the wheel diameter, this is important part. 2.1" 1.95", to the width tyre. The width of the rim tyres you should have. If your wheel is wth a wide tyre, then a 1.95" wide will be absolutely fine. What you should consider changing a tyre is the terrain, the puncture protection level, the weight, the durability vs the price. The bike alone shouldn't influence tyre Q: in free(): invalid size (normal) I'm writing a big application and i recently included my new module for working with files. It has simple writing and strings, it tested to be perfect Red It does exactly what Here's implementation there: CFile_open(CFile* char* filename, char* mode) owner->file = fopen(filename, mode); if == NULL) { return 1; } } int CFile_close(CFile* owner) { if == NULL) { return 0; } else if (fclose(owner->file) ) { return 1; } else { return 0;

I want to get a pair of 26 x 2.1  tires foR my Bicycle.
my wheEls Are CoMpatIble With these dimenSIons.
a reputable store near me oFfers 26X1.95 tIRes. I AM pRetty Sure thaT 1.95S aRE ComPaTiBle WiTH mY 2.1 wheeL.
ThE issue iS, these are mArkEtEd at tires for A SiNgle speed bIcyCle of theirs. MIne Is a 21 (3 x 7) spEeD biKE.
From WhaT I can Tell, thE Wheel mAtters in mAtTErs of cOMpatibiLITy With The gearing, and not tHE tIRes as long as it iS compaTiBLe WITh mY whEel. But stilL, tO be exTRa sure, dOEs IT MAttER that these tirEs are marketED foR singlE-sPeeD Cycles As lonG aS TheY are compatiBle wIth my wheeLs?

A:

The AMount of GEars has No bearIng On tHe tyPE oF tYre. 
thE 26" ParT ReFerS To tHe wheel dIaMeTer, so This IS THE mosT imPortAnt paRt. 
The 2.1" or 1.95", refer tO thE widTH of The tyRe. The WidtH oF the rIm deteRmine WhIch width tyres yoU shoUld have. If YouR wHeeL iS ok wtH A 2.1 wide tYre, TheN a 1.95" wide tYre will BE abSoLUTElY fine. 
What you should CoNSIdEr when chAnging A TyRe IS the terrAiN, thE punCTUre prOtecTIoN level, thE weighT, ThE dUrabiliTy Vs grip AnD thE prIce. ThE Bike Gears aLone shouLdn't iNFluence the tyre CHoice. 

 Q:

Error in 'A.OuT': FReE(): InvaLid Next size (norMal)

I'M WritIng a BIg AppLIcatiOn and I rECeNTly included there my nEw Module For woRking with fileS. It has simpLE FUnctions Of wrITiNG integers and stRings, It was testeD To be perfEct on red Hat. It Does exactLY What i wanT.
HeRe's The ImpLEMeNtation of the fUNCtioNs There:
inT CFIle_open(cFiLe* oWneR, chAr* Filename, cHar* mode) {
    oWnEr->FiLe = FopEn(filEName, mode);
    If (OwnEr->FilE == NULL) {
        REturn 0;
    } eLse {
        reTurn 1;
    }
}

InT CfIle_Close(CFILe* OWNer) {
    iF (oWnEr->fiLe == NuLl) {
        retuRn 0;
    } elSE {
        if (Fclose(oWner->file) ) {
            rEtuRN 1;
        } elsE {
            rEtUrn 0;


I want to get a pair of 2 6 x 2.1  t iresfor  my  B icyc le.My wheels arec ompa tible with these dimen sions .A  rep u ta ble s tore ne a rm e  of fe rs  26 x1 . 95  tire s.I am pr etty suretha t1.95s are co m pa tible with  my  2.1 wheel.The  issue  i s,t heseare  mark eted a t  tires  for a si ng l e spee d  bicycl e of  the irs. Mine is a 21 (3 x 7) speed bik e.
Fro mw ha t I c antell, thewh eel m a tters i n  m a t t ers of compatibil ity with th e  ge aring,  a ndn ot the  tire sa s l ong as it i s co mpatiblewith m y  wheel. But sti ll, to  be  ex tras ur e,  do es itm at ter tha t theseti re s are  mar k e t e d fo r s ingl e-spe ed cycles aslon g as the y are  comp atib le  with  my wh eels? 
A:

The amountof g ears hasnobe ari ng  on t h e type  of  ty re. 
Th e 26" p a rtre f e r sto the wheel diame te r ,  s o this i s them os ti mportant  p art . 
T h e  2.1"  or1 .9 5", refe r to t h ewi dth ofth e tyre .The  wi dth o f  the  rim d etermine  whic h  width tyres y o u should have .  I f yo u r wh eel  is ok wtha 2. 1  wid e ty r e,  th e n a 1 .95"wi d et yre will be absolut el y fine . 
Wh at you should  considerw h e n changi ng a ty r e is the terra in, t he punctur e  protect ion l evel, th e weight, t he durab ili tyvsgri p an d the price.T h e bi ke  gearsalo ne shou ldn 'tinf lue nc e the tyr e choice .
 Q :
Er ror i n  'a.out' :fre e( ):inval i d next  size  (no rm al ) 

I 'm writ i ng a  big  a pp lica tio nand i  rec e ntl y inclu ded there  my newmo du le forworking withfi les. It ha ssim ple fu n c tions of  writing integers and s t rings,itwas t este d to be p erf ect on  Re d  Hat.It doe s exa ct lyw h at iw a nt .
H er e's the im p l eme ntati on  ofthe fun ctions there:
intC Fil e_open(CFile*  ow ner, c ha r*f il e nam e, cha r *  mode) {
    ow ner->file=f op en(filenam e , m od e);
   if (ow ner-> f ile ==NULL) {
       re tu rn 0 ;    } else {       return 1;     } }
intCFi le_clo se (CF ile*owner) {
   if  (owne r- >file== NU LL ) {
       return 0;
    } els e {
      if  (fclose( own e r-> file) ) { 
           r etu rn1;
     } e lse{ 
        re t urn 0;


I want_to get_a pair of 26_x 2.1__tires for_my_Bicycle.
My wheels are_compatible with these_dimensions.
A reputable store near_me offers 26x1.95_tires._I am pretty sure that 1.95s are compatible with my 2.1 wheel.
The issue is,_these_are marketed_at_tires_for a single speed bicycle_of theirs. Mine is a_21 (3_x 7) speed bike.
From what I can tell,_the_wheel matters in_matters of compatibility with the gearing, and not the_tires as long as it is_compatible with my_wheel._But_still, to be extra_sure, does it matter that these_tires are marketed for single-speed cycles_as long as they are compatible with_my wheels?

A:

The amount of gears has_no bearing on the type_of tyre._
The 26" part refers to_the wheel diameter,_so this_is the most_important part. 
The 2.1" or 1.95",_refer to the_width of the tyre. The width_of_the rim determine_which_width_tyres you_should have. If_your_wheel is_ok_wth a 2.1 wide tyre, then_a_1.95" wide tyre will be absolutely fine._
What you should consider_when_changing a tyre is_the terrain, the puncture protection_level, the weight, the durability vs_grip and_the price._The bike gears alone shouldn't influence the tyre choice. 

 Q:

Error_in 'a.out': free(): invalid next size_(normal)

I'm writing a big_application and_i_recently included there_my_new module_for working with files. It has simple_functions of_writing integers and strings, it was_tested to be perfect_on_Red Hat. It does exactly what_i want.
Here's the implementation of the_functions there:
int CFile_open(CFile* owner, char*_filename,_char*_mode) {
   _owner->file = fopen(filename, mode);
  _ if (owner->file_== NULL) {
    __  return 0;
  __} else {
   ___  return 1;
 _  }
}

int CFile_close(CFile* owner) {
_   if (owner->file == NULL) {
 _  _   return 0;
___ } else {
      _ if_(fclose(owner->file) ) {
_         _ return 1;
    _   } else {
     _      return 0;
