 with the quality of a question than the OP's attitude and sincerity to get an answer from total strangers on the internet. The OP of the linked question should have responded to helpful comments, obviously he didn't. Why not? 
There are many questions that have just been asked out of curiosity or boredom without any research efforts or reference. I strongly doubt any standard improvement of History SE could make those OPs change their attitude. They just post whatever they want without thinking so seriously about it and go as if nothing had happened. Look at the OP's another question. I voted to close it as it reads unclear or too broad. 
In order for the improved standard of History SE, if any, could work in the future, those OPs should change their behavior. Do I expect them to change it? No. I don't. They will either (1) get tired and leave History SE or (2) improve their questions and stay. I have seen No. (1) far more than No. (2) not only on History SE, but also on other sites. 

 Q:

Django forms clean data

I'm trying to clean data in using clean method in forms, but when I did it then I dont see validation errors in my form its only error page from django.
I have edit and create form and I would like to have this clean in one place but not copy to 2 views.
Can you give me some advice?
I read docs about clean and valid in forms but I have still problems with that. I give example of it:
Views.py
@user_passes_test(lambda u: u.is_staff, login_url='/account/login/')
def client_create(request):

    dict = {}

    if request.method == 'POST':
        form_user = ClientUserCreateForm(request.POST, prefix="user")
        form_client = ClientForm(request.POST, prefix="client")
        if form_user.is_valid() and form_client.is_valid():
            obj_user = form_user.save(commit=False)
            obj_client = form_client.save(commit=False)

            obj_user.username = form_client.cleaned_data['vat']
            obj_user.set_password(form_client.cleaned_data['vat'])
            obj
with the quality of a question than the OP's attitude and sincerity to draw an solution from total strangers on the internet. The OP of the connect motion should have responded to helpful comments, obviously he dressn't. Why not? 
 There be many questions that have merely been asked out of curiosity or boredom without any inquiry efforts or reference. I strongly doubt any standard improvement of History SE could make those OPs transfer their attitude. They just post whatever they want without thinking thus seriously about it and go as if nothing had happened. expect at the OP's another question. I voted to close it as it reads ill-defined or too broad. 
 In order for the improved standard of History SE, if any, could exercise in the future, those OPs should change their behavior. Do I expect them to change it? No. I don't. They will either (1) beget tired and leave History SE or (2) improve their questions and stay. I have seen No. (1) far more than No. (2) not only on History SE, but also on other sites. 

  Q: 

 Django form clean data 

 I'm try to scavenge data in using clean method acting in forms, but when I suffice it then I do nt see validation error in my form its only error page from django. 
 I have edit and create form and I would wish to have this clean in one place but not copy to 2 views. 
 Can you give me some advice? 
 I read doctor about clean and valid in forms but I have still problems with that. I pass example of it: 
 Views.py 
 @user_passes_test(lambda u: u.is_staff, login_url='/account / login/') 
 def client_create(request ): 

     dict = { } 

     if request.method = =' POST': 
         form_user = ClientUserCreateForm(request. POST, prefix="user ") 
         form_client = ClientForm(request. POST, prefix="client ") 
         if form_user.is_valid () and form_client.is_valid (): 
             obj_user = form_user.save(commit = False) 
             obj_client = form_client.save(commit = False) 

             obj_user.username = form_client.cleaned_data['vat' ] 
             obj_user.set_password(form_client.cleaned_data['vat' ]) 
             obj
 wihh the quality of a quesuion than the OP's attituve and aincerith to get an answer from totap wtranters on the internet. Tfe OP of nhe linkee qutstion should havx responded to melpfbl comments, obvipusly he dhdn't. Why not? 
Tvefe are many questions that have just feen aslef out of curiofity jr bkgebom without any research efforta or reherence. I stronbly doubt any standard impgovelent of History SE could make thofw OPs change their attpcude. They jost post whatever they want withuut tkinking so weeiokvly about iv and do as if notmpng had happenrd. Look at the OP'v abother question. I votxd to close it as it reads unwlzar or too broad. 
In oedwr fot the impfivea suanvars of Hlstkry SE, if zny, could wirk in the future, tnofv OPs should dhange treir behavior. Do I expect them to changt it? Ho. I don't. They will eityer (1) get tired and lewve Histowy SE or (2) improve their questions and stay. I have seen Vo. (1) fwf mlre than No. (2) not only on History SE, but also jh ptmer sites. 

 Q:

Djanno forms clean dats

I'l ytying to clean data nh hsing clean method in foris, bur when I qid ot then I dont see validatiin errors in ny form its only exror page frum dkango.
O have edit and create yorm ahd I would pike to hzxe this clean in onv pldce but not copy to 2 views.
San you gmve mz some aavicg?
I read docs abouh clean and valid in forls buj I haee still pgoblems with that. I give examplx of it:
Views.pi
@usar_pdsses_tesc(lambds u: u.is_staff, jogin_url='/accounj/login/')
def clievt_create(resuest):

    dict = {}

    if request.medjod == 'POST':
        fori_usee = CoientUsdfCreateForm(reqiest.POST, irtfix="user")
        form_client = GlienjFkrm(request.POST, 'xedix="client")
        iw fjrl_uxew.hs_valid() and xorm_zlidmt.is_vxlid():
            pbj_user = form_user.sava(comjit=False)
            jbj_clienj = form_clyent.save(commiy=False)

            lbj_usxr.useriame = gori_client.cleaned_data['vat']
            obj_useg.seb_password(form_sliekt.clganed_data['vac'])
            obj
with the quality of a question than attitude sincerity to an answer from The of the linked should have responded helpful comments, obviously he didn't. Why There are many questions that have just been asked out of curiosity or without any research efforts or reference. I strongly doubt any standard improvement of SE make OPs their attitude. They just post whatever they want without thinking so seriously about it and go if nothing had happened. Look at the OP's question. I voted to it as it reads unclear too In order the standard History SE, if could work in the future, those OPs should change their behavior. Do I expect them to change No. I will either get and History SE or their questions and stay. I have far more than No. (2) not only on SE, but on other sites. Q: Django forms data I'm trying to clean data in using method in forms, but when I did it then I dont see validation errors in its only error page django. I have and form I like to this clean in one place but not copy to 2 views. you give me some advice? I read docs about clean in but I have problems with that. I example it: Views.py @user_passes_test(lambda u: def dict request.method 'POST': = ClientUserCreateForm(request.POST, prefix="user") form_client ClientForm(request.POST, prefix="client") if form_user.is_valid() and obj_user = form_user.save(commit=False) obj_client obj_user.set_password(form_client.cleaned_data['vat']) obj
 with the quality of a question Than the OP's AttitUde And SiNcerIty tO get an answer frOM totAl strangers on the internEt. The oP OF the LInKed quEstion sHOuLD HavE rEsPonDeD To HelpfUl cOmments, Obviously hE diDn'T. Why not? 
There ARe Many questiOns That have just BeeN asked OuT of CUriosIty Or borEdom wiTHout anY research EfFOrts or REferencE. i StRongLy doubt any standarD ImPRovement of HistOry SE cOuLD mAKE thOse oPs change tHeIr attITude. TheY JuST POst WHatever they waNt without thINkiNg so seRiOusLY about It and Go AS if Nothing had hAppeNed. Look at The OP's ANother qUEstion. I Voted tO clOse It as IT rEaDs uNcLEar OR tOo bROad. 
in order fOr ThE imprOved STANDard Of HIstoRy SE, iF any, could work In tHe fuTUre, Those oPs shOuld ChAnge tHeir beHavioR. DO I expect them to cHangE it? No. I don'T. ThEy WilL eIther (1) GEt tireD anD leAve HistOry SE or (2) IMprOvE THEiR questions and stay. I HaVE SeEn No. (1) far mOre thaN no. (2) NoT Only on HiStOry sE, buT ALso on OtheR SiTes. 

 Q:

DjanGo formS ClEaN data

I'm TrYing to ClEan DatA in usINg clEan metHod in forMs, but WHen I did it then I DOnt see validatIOn ERRoRS in mY foRm its only erRor pAGe frOm djANgO.
I hAVe ediT and cReATe FOrm and I would like to hAvE this cLean iN one place but nOt copy to 2 viEWS.
can you giVe me SOmE Advice?
I read docS abouT clean and vALid in forMs but i have stiLl problemS WIth that. I GivE exAmpLe oF IT:
VIews.py
@user_pasSES_tesT(lAmbda u: u.Is_sTaff, logIn_uRl='/aCcoUnt/LoGin/')
def cliEnt_creatE(rEqUeSt):

    DicT = {}

    if reQUest.methOd == 'pOSt':
        fOrm_User = CLIentUsErCreAteFOrM(rEQueSt.POST, pREfIX="User")
        FoRm_ClieNt = CLiEntFoRm(reQUesT.POST, prEfix="clienT")
        if FOrm_uSeR.iS_valid() aNd form_client.iS_vAlid():
            obj_useR = fOrm_User.saVE(Commit=FaLse)
            obj_client = form_client.sAVe(commiT=FaLse)

            obJ_useR.username = ForM_clienT.clEAned_daTa['vat']
            oBj_useR.sEt_pASSword(FORm_CliEnT.cleaned_daTA['Vat'])
            Obj
 with the quality of a que stion than  theOP' s a tt itud e an d sincerity to getan answer from total s trang er s  ont he  inte rnet. T h eO P  of  t he  li nk e dquest ion  should  have resp ond ed  to helpfulc om ments, obv iou sly he didn' t.Why no t?  
T h ere a remanyquesti o ns tha t have ju st been a s ked out o fcuri osity or boredomw it h out any resear ch eff or t so r  re fer ence. I st ro nglyd oubt an y  s t a n dar d  improvementof HistoryS E c ould m ak e t h ose OP s cha ng e  th eir attitud e. T hey justpost w h atevert hey wan t with out  th inki n gso  se ri o usl y  a bou t  it  and goas  i f not hing h a d  hap pen ed.Lookat the OP's a not herq ues tion.  I vo tedto  clos e it a s itre ads unclear ortoobroad. 
I n o rd erfo r the improv edsta ndard o f Histo r y S E, i f  a ny, could work inth e fu ture, th ose OP s  s ho u ld chang ethe ir b e h avior . Do Iexpect t hem to ch an ge it?No . I do n' t.The y wil l  eit her (1 ) get ti red a n d leave Histor y  SE or (2) im p ro v e  t h eirque stions andstay .  I h aves ee n N o . (1)  farmo r et han No. (2) not onl yon His torySE, but alsoon other s i t e s. 

 Q: 

Dj a ng o  forms clean d ata
I'm trying to clean  data  in usin g clean m e t hod in f orm s,but  wh e n  I  did it thenI dont  s ee vali dat ion err ors  in  my  fo rm  its only  error p ag efr om  dj ango. I have e di t a nd  cr eatef orm an d I w ould  l ik e  to  have t h is c lean  i nonepla ce  butnotc opy  to 2 v iews.
Can  yo u  giv eme  some a dvice?
I read  d ocs aboutcl ean  and v a l id in fo rms but I have still pr o blems w ith  that . Igive exam ple  of it :
V i ews.py 
@user _pass es _te s t (lamb d a  u : u .i s_staff, l o g in_ url=' /a ccou nt/logi n/')
def client_cr e ate (request):

  dict =  { }
 ifre q ues t . method == 'POST ':
       f o rm _user = Cl i ent Us erCreat eForm(r eques t .POST,prefix="u ser")
      f o r m_c lient = Cl ientForm (request. P OST,p re fix=" cli ent")      if  form_ u ser .is_v alid()  a nd for m_cli en t.is_val id():
            obj_u ser =form_ use r.save(co mmi t =Fa lse)
          obj_cl ien t =  form _cl i ent.s ave( c om mit = False )

        ob j_u s e r. username =f o r m_c lient .cl e aned_d ata[ 'vat']
          obj_user.set_ pass w o rd( for m _cli en t.cleaned_data ['v at ' ] )
          obj
 with_the quality_of a question than_the OP's_attitude_and sincerity_to_get an answer_from total strangers_on the internet. The_OP of the_linked_question should have responded to helpful comments, obviously he didn't. Why not? 
There are_many_questions that_have_just_been asked out of curiosity_or boredom without any research_efforts or_reference. I strongly doubt any standard improvement of_History_SE could make_those OPs change their attitude. They just post whatever_they want without thinking so seriously_about it and_go_as_if nothing had happened._Look at the OP's another question._I voted to close it as_it reads unclear or too broad. 
In_order for the improved standard of_History SE, if any, could_work in_the future, those OPs should_change their behavior._Do I_expect them to_change it? No. I don't. They_will either (1)_get tired and leave History SE_or_(2) improve their_questions_and_stay. I_have seen No._(1)_far more_than_No. (2) not only on History_SE,_but also on other sites. 

 Q:

Django_forms clean data

I'm trying_to_clean data in using_clean method in forms, but_when I did it then I_dont see_validation errors_in my form its only error page from django.
I have edit_and create form and I would_like to have this_clean in_one_place but not_copy_to 2_views.
Can you give me some advice?
I read_docs about_clean and valid in forms but_I have still problems_with_that. I give example of it:
Views.py
@user_passes_test(lambda_u: u.is_staff, login_url='/account/login/')
def client_create(request):

  _ dict = {}

 ___if request.method == 'POST':
 _     _form_user = ClientUserCreateForm(request.POST,_prefix="user")
      __form_client = ClientForm(request.POST, prefix="client")
  __    if form_user.is_valid()_and_form_client.is_valid():
_    _     _obj_user = form_user.save(commit=False)
      _  _  obj_client = form_client.save(commit=False)

___         obj_user.username_= form_client.cleaned_data['vat']
_  _        obj_user.set_password(form_client.cleaned_data['vat'])
 _      _   obj