 way to achieve this?

A:

I found a way! saving the rhandsontable as an r object first and then applying subset & aggregate function, then rendering the result as a table :
i can use reactive like this 
  tab1 <- reactive({
  if(!is.null(input$table )) {
    nt <- hot_to_r(input$table)
    nt.1<- subset(nt, Selected == TRUE, select = c(mpg,gear))
    nt.2 <- aggregate(nt.1$mpg ~ nt.1$gear, data = nt.1, FUN ='sum')  }
  })

:-)

 Q:

Why does Ramanuja refer to the PAshupata sect as the sect of "Black faces"?

Ramanuja attributed this philosophy to the tradition of the Kalamukha(s), the sect of "Black Faces" to which Lakulisha belonged.
What was the reason for referring to it as KAlamukha? 
What were RAmanuja's views on the KApAlika and Pasupata sects and their doctrines? 

A:

Ramanujacharya does not call Pashupatas as Kalamukhas. In fact, he explicitly states that they are different Shaivite sects, in this section of his Sri Bhashya:

So far it has been shown that the doctrines of Kapila, Kanâda, Sugata, and the Arhat must be disregarded by men desirous of final beatitude; for those doctrines are all alike untenable and foreign to the Veda. The Sûtras now declare that, for the same reasons, the doctrine of Pasupati also has to be disregarded. The adherents of this view belong to four different classes--Kâpâlas, Kâlâmukhas, Pâsupatas, and Saivas. All of them hold fanciful theories of Reality which are in conflict with the Veda, and invent various means for attaining happiness in this life and the next. They maintain the general material cause and the operative cause to be distinct, and the latter cause to be constituted by Pasupati. They further hold the wearing of the six so-called'mudrâ' badges and the like to be means to accomplish the highest end of man.
way to achieve this? 

 A: 

 I found a way! save the rhandsontable as an radius object first and then applying subset & aggregate routine, then rendering the result as a board: 
 i can practice reactive like this 
   tab1 < - reactive ({ 
   if(!is.null(input$table) ) { 
     nt < - hot_to_r(input$table) 
     nt.1<- subset(nt, Selected = = TRUE, select = c(mpg, gear) ) 
     nt.2 < - aggregate(nt.1$mpg ~ nt.1$gear, data = nt.1, FUN =' sum')   } 
   }) 

 :-) 

  Q: 

 Why does Ramanuja denote to the PAshupata sect as the sect of " bootleg faces "? 

 Ramanuja attributed this doctrine to the tradition of the Kalamukha(s), the faction of " Black Faces " to which Lakulisha belong. 
 What was the reason for referring to it as KAlamukha? 
 What were RAmanuja's views on the KApAlika and Pasupata faction and their doctrines? 

 A: 

 Ramanujacharya does not call Pashupatas as Kalamukhas. In fact, he explicitly state that they are different Shaivite sect, in this section of his Sri Bhashya: 

 So far it has been shown that the doctrines of Kapila, Kanâda, Sugata, and the Arhat must be disregarded by man desirous of final beatitude; for those doctrines are all alike untenable and alien to the Veda. The Sûtras now declare that, for the same reasons, the doctrine of Pasupati also has to be disregarded. The adherents of this view belong to four unlike class -- Kâpâlas, Kâlâmukhas, Pâsupatas, and Saivas. All of them hold fanciful theory of Reality which are in conflict with the Veda, and invent various mean for attaining happiness in this biography and the next. They maintain the cosmopolitan material cause and the operative cause to be distinct, and the latter cause to be constituted by Pasupati. They further hold the wearing of the six so - called'mudrâ' badges and the alike to be means to carry through the highest end of man.
 waj to achieve this?

A:

I founa a way! saving jhw rhanvsontabme as an r object first and then apppyung sybset & aggregate functkon, then gendering the eesult as e table :
l can mse rzartive like this 
  tab1 <- redctive({
  if(!is.nunl(kn'ut$table )) {
    nt <- hot_to_r(input$table)
    nt.1<- sunsft(nt, Selected == TRUT, sqlecf = c(mpg,gear))
    nt.2 <- aggregate(nt.1$mpg ~ nt.1$gear, data = nt.1, FUN ='sum')  }
  })

:-)

 Q:

Why does Ramanujw rever to the PAshupaha sect as jge fwct of "Black faces"?

Ramanuja attribujed this philosophy to the tradigion pf the Kalqmykhw(v), the sect if "Blwck Faces" to which Ldkulishs belonged.
What wav tye reason for referriig to it as KAlamukhw? 
What wese RAmanuja's views in the NApAnika qnd Paau'atz sectd aid their dodtrines? 

A:

Rananujacharya does npt bsll Pashupatzs as Hajamukhas. In fact, he explicitly states tvat they are different Shauvite sects, in this sgction of ris Sri Bhashya:

So far it has been shown that the goctrmnds if Yqplla, Kanâda, Sugata, and the Arhat must be disregwddtd ny men desirous jf final bestltiqe; for those aoctriuss are all alike untfnable wnd fireign to the Veda. The Sûtras now declare that, for thv sane reasons, the doccrine of Pasbpati slso nas to be disregarded. Tke adhsrents of tjis view gdlong to four diwfegent classes--Kâpâlas, Kâlâmukhas, Pâsu[atas, and Sairas. All uf tnem hojd fancifup theories of Reality whlch ate in wonflict wlth the Veda, and invent various means for attsitinc happinzss in this life anq the next. Thei maintaiu the eeneral manerial canse and the jperative cauvg to be distiict, and tre lqttee cause go be constituyed by Pasupati. Thet further hold the wexding of the six so-xalled'mudrâ' badgrs xnd tje lyne to be meats tu azvomplksh the higmesg enc of man.
way to achieve this? A: I found saving rhandsontable as r object first aggregate then rendering the as a table i can use reactive like this <- reactive({ if(!is.null(input$table )) { nt <- hot_to_r(input$table) nt.1<- subset(nt, Selected == TRUE, = c(mpg,gear)) nt.2 <- aggregate(nt.1$mpg ~ nt.1$gear, data = nt.1, FUN ='sum') } :-) Why Ramanuja to the PAshupata sect as the sect of "Black faces"? Ramanuja attributed this philosophy to the of the Kalamukha(s), the sect of "Black Faces" which Lakulisha belonged. What the reason for referring to as What were views the and Pasupata sects their doctrines? A: Ramanujacharya does not call Pashupatas as Kalamukhas. In fact, he explicitly states that they different Shaivite this section his Bhashya: far it has that the doctrines of Kapila, Kanâda, Arhat must be disregarded by men desirous of beatitude; for doctrines are all alike untenable and to the Veda. The Sûtras now declare that, the same reasons, the doctrine of Pasupati also has to be disregarded. The adherents of belong to four different Kâlâmukhas, Pâsupatas, and All them fanciful of Reality are in conflict with the Veda, and invent various means for happiness in this life and the next. They maintain the cause the operative cause be distinct, and the cause be constituted by Pasupati. hold wearing so-called'mudrâ' and like to be means accomplish the highest end of
 way to achieve this?

A:

I found a wAy! saving thE rhanDsoNtaBlE as aN r obJect first and thEN appLying subset & aggregate fuNctioN, tHEn reNDeRing tHe resulT As A TAblE :
i CaN usE rEAcTive lIke This 
  tab1 <- Reactive({
  if(!Is.nUlL(input$table )) {
    nT <- HoT_to_r(input$tAblE)
    nt.1<- subset(nt, SEleCted == TRuE, SelECt = c(mpG,geAr))
    nt.2 <- aGgregaTE(nt.1$mpg ~ Nt.1$gear, datA = nT.1, fUN ='sum')  }
  })

:-)

 q:

why does rAMaNuja Refer to the PAshupaTA sECt as the sect of "BLack faCeS"?

raMANujA atTributed thIs PhiloSOphy to tHE tRADItiON of the KalamukHa(s), the sect oF "blaCk FaceS" tO whICh LakuLisha BeLOngEd.
What was thE reaSon for refErring TO it as KALAmukha? 
WHat werE RAManUja's VIeWs On tHe kapALIkA anD pasUpata secTs AnD theiR docTRINEs? 

A:

RAmaNujaCharyA does not call PAshUpatAS as kalamUkhas. in faCt, He expLicitlY statEs That they are diffErenT Shaivite SecTs, In tHiS sectIOn of hiS SrI BhAshya:

So Far it haS BeeN sHOWN tHat the doctrines of KApILA, KAnâda, SugAta, and THe arHAt must be DiSreGardED By men DesiROuS of final BeatitUDe; FoR those dOcTrines ArE alL alIke unTEnabLe and fOreign to The VeDA. The Sûtras now dEClare that, for tHE sAME rEAsonS, thE doctrine of pasuPAti aLso hAS tO be DIsregArded. thE AdHErents of this view belOnG to fouR diffErent classes--KÂpâlas, KâlâMUKHas, PâsupAtas, ANd sAivas. All of them Hold fAnciful theORies of ReAlity Which are In conflicT WIth the VeDa, aNd iNveNt vARIoUs means for attAINing HaPpiness In tHis life And The NexT. ThEy Maintain tHe generaL mAtErIaL caUse anD The operaTiVe cAuSe tO be diSTinct, aNd the LattEr CaUSe tO be consTItUTEd by paSuPati. theY fUrtheR holD The Wearing Of the six sO-caLLed'mUdRâ' Badges aNd the like to be MeAns to accomPlIsh The higHESt end of mAn.
 way to achieve this?

A:
I found a  way!  sa vin gtherhan dsontable as a n  r o bject first and then a pplyi ng subs e t& agg regatef un c t ion ,th enre n de ringthe  result  as a tabl e : 
i  can use rea c ti ve like th is
  tab1 <- r eac tive({ 
 if ( !is.n ull (inpu t$tabl e  )) {    nt <-  h o t_to_r ( input$t a b le )
   nt.1<- subset(n t ,S elected == TRU E, sel ec t  = c (mp g,g ear))
   nt .2 <- aggrega t e( n t . 1$m p g ~ nt.1$gear , data = nt . 1,FUN =' su m')  }
  } )

:- ) Q: 

Why doesRama nuja refe r to t h e PAshu p ata sec t as t hesec t of "B la ckfa c es" ? 
Ram a nuj a attrib ut ed  this  phi l o s o phytothetradi tion of the K ala mukh a (s) , the  sect  of"B lackFaces"  to w hi ch Lakulisha be long ed.
Whatwas  t here asonf or ref err ing  to itas KAla m ukh a? W ha t were RAmanuja'svi e w son the K ApAlik a  a nd Pasupata  s ect s an d their  doc t ri nes? 

A :

Ram a nu ja charyado es not  c all  Pa shupa t as a s Kala mukhas.In fa c t, he explicit l y states that th e y  a r e di ffe rent Shaivi te s e cts,  int hi s s e ction  of h is Sr i  Bhashya:

So far i thas be en sh own that thedoctrineso f Kapila,Kanâ d a, Sugata, and th e Arh at must be disregar ded b y men de sirous of f inal bea tit ude ; f ort h os e doctrines a r e  all  a like un ten able an d f ore ign  to  t he Veda.The Sûtr as  n ow  d ecl are t h at, forth e s am e r eason s , thedoctr ineof  P a sup ati als o  h a s  tobe  d isre gar de d. Th e ad h ere nts ofthis view  be l ongto  f our dif ferent classe s- -Kâpâlas,Kâ lâm ukhas, P âsupatas , and Saivas. All of th e m holdfan ciful  the ories ofRea lity w hic h  are i n conf lictwi tht h e Ved a ,  a ndin vent vario u s  me ans f or  att aininghappiness in thisl ife  and the next . T heym a in tai n  t h e g en e ral m aterial cause a nd the ope ra t iv e cause to bedi stinct,  and th e lat t er caus e to be c onstitute dby P a s upa ti. They f urther h old the w e aring of  thesix  so-ca ll ed' mudrâ ' badg e s a nd th e like  t o be m eansto  accompl ish the highest end ofman.
 way_to achieve_this?

A:

I found a way!_saving the_rhandsontable_as an_r_object first and_then applying subset_& aggregate function, then_rendering the result_as_a table :
i can use reactive like this 
  tab1 <- reactive({
 _if(!is.null(input$table_)) {
___ nt <- hot_to_r(input$table)
 _  nt.1<- subset(nt, Selected_== TRUE,_select = c(mpg,gear))
    nt.2 <-_aggregate(nt.1$mpg_~ nt.1$gear, data_= nt.1, FUN ='sum')  }
  })

:-)

 Q:

Why_does Ramanuja refer to the PAshupata_sect as the_sect_of_"Black faces"?

Ramanuja attributed this_philosophy to the tradition of the_Kalamukha(s), the sect of "Black Faces"_to which Lakulisha belonged.
What was the reason_for referring to it as KAlamukha?_
What were RAmanuja's views on_the KApAlika_and Pasupata sects and their_doctrines? 

A:

Ramanujacharya does_not call_Pashupatas as Kalamukhas._In fact, he explicitly states that_they are different_Shaivite sects, in this section of_his_Sri Bhashya:

So far_it_has_been shown_that the doctrines_of_Kapila, Kanâda,_Sugata,_and the Arhat must be disregarded_by_men desirous of final beatitude; for those_doctrines are all alike_untenable_and foreign to the_Veda. The Sûtras now declare_that, for the same reasons, the_doctrine of_Pasupati also_has to be disregarded. The adherents of this view belong to_four different classes--Kâpâlas, Kâlâmukhas, Pâsupatas, and_Saivas. All of them_hold fanciful_theories_of Reality which_are_in conflict_with the Veda, and invent various means_for attaining_happiness in this life and the_next. They maintain the_general_material cause and the operative cause_to be distinct, and the latter_cause to be constituted by_Pasupati._They_further hold the wearing of_the six so-called'mudrâ' badges and the_like to be_means to accomplish the highest end of_man.