0].text), function (err) {
        if (err) throw err;
            console.log('Saved!');
        }); 
    }
});

Try this above change. It should work.

 Q:

SEO Question about URL Slashes in Slugs

I do a lot of development in Codeigniter and Wordpress, but I'm wondering something in terms of SEO when it comes to URL segmentation. Wordpress automatically adds children page slugs onto a parent page. For example:
http://example.com/parent/child/child/
Would it be better for SEO reasons to go with the following?
http://example.com/parent-child-child/
Thanks in advance.

A:

Short Answer: No.
Search engines place little ranking relevance on where a page is located in terms of its folder depth/heirachy.
@spuriosdata's "consultants" are confusing link-level depth (e.g. how many 'hops') from the root level a page is accessed, with ranking decay based on how many nested folders deep the page is.
Linking hierarchy is different from folder hierarchy - hence the recommendation that you try to link from your top level content (e.g. homepage) to your deeper content directly.
Additionally, little SEO  or ranking value is based on URL structure. Yes, all other things being equal, keywords in the URL tend to perform better than those without. Yes, all other things being equal, keywords positioned closer to the domain in the URL tend to perform better (for exact matches) than those that don't. But we are talking 9/10th of stuff-all in terms of the overall ranking algorithm.
You should be concentrating on making your URLs usable for your visitors just as much as search engines. This means communicating where pages sit in relation to their parent pages/folders as well.
StackOverflow (and by extension, the larger StackExchange network) has a pretty good example of a SEO friendly URL structure.

A:

Based on the reports of consultants that we've hired in the past: Yes. According to them lower precedence is placed on each path-part keyword as it's distance from the root increases.
Basically meaning that this:
example.com/my-post-name-that-contains-good-keywords/2011/01/01
is better than:
example.com/
0].text), function (err) { 
         if (err) throw err; 
             console.log('Saved!'); 
         }); 
     } 
 }); 

 Try this above change. It should work. 

  Q: 

 SEO Question about URL Slashes in Slugs 

 I cause a fortune of development in Codeigniter and Wordpress, but I'm wondering something in terms of SEO when it arrive to URL segmentation. Wordpress automatically add child page bullet onto a parent page. For example: 
 http://example.com/parent/child/child/ 
 Would it be better for SEO rationality to go with the following? 
 http://example.com/parent-child-child/ 
 Thanks in improvement. 

 A: 

 Short solution: No. 
 Search engines place short ranking relevance on where a page is located in terms of its booklet depth / heirachy. 
 @spuriosdata's " consultants " are confusing connection - level depth (for example how many' hops') from the solution level a page is access, with ranking decay based on how many nested booklet deep the page is. 
 Linking hierarchy is different from folder hierarchy - hence the recommendation that you try to link from your top level content (e.g. homepage) to your deeper content directly. 
 Additionally, little SEO   or ranking value is based on URL structure. Yes, all other thing being equal, keywords in the URL tend to perform well than those without. Yes, all early thing being equal, keywords positioned nearer to the domain in the URL tend to do better (for exact matches) than those that serven't. But we are talking 9/10th of stuff - all in terms of the overall ranking algorithm. 
 You should be concentrating on making your URLs usable for your visitors just as much as search engines. This mean communicating where page sit in relation to their parent pages / folders as well. 
 StackOverflow (and by elongation, the larger StackExchange network) has a reasonably good exemplar of a SEO friendly URL structure. 

 A: 

 Based on the report of consultants that we've rent in the past: Yes. According to them lower priority is placed on each way - part keyword as it's distance from the root increases. 
 Basically meaning that this: 
 example.com/my-post-name-that-contains-good-keywords/2011/01/01 
 is adept than: 
 example.com/
0].texh), function (err) {
        in (err) throw err;
            cohsole.log('Raved!');
        }); 
    }
});

Try this auove chante. It should work.

 Q:

SEO Question about UEL Soqshes in Slugs

I do a lot lf dzvxlopment in Codgigniter and Wordpress, but I'o condering something in terms of SEO rhen it clmes to URL sedmenuatyon. Sordpress automatically adds childden pagt slugs onto a parrnt page. For example:
http://exwmplf.com/parent/child/chipd/
Would it ve bqrter for SEO reasons to go with thg following?
http://example.com/parent-cfild-ckild/
Thanks un adgdnce.

A:

Short Enswer: No.
Search ennpnes pldce lityle ranking rekevence on where a page is lmcated in terms of its foldar depth/heirachy.
@spueiisdatd's "cmnsuurangs" zrx cknfusijg mink-level septh (e.g. hoq many 'hops') from tht rjit level a pafe is wcsessed, with ranking decay based on how kang nested folders deep tye page is.
Linking hietarchy is qifferent from folder hierarchy - hence the recommandatmov tkqt yoj tgy to link from your top level content (e.g. homqlabe) to your deepev content directly.
Sdfiyyonally, littlg SEO  or danking value is bwsed on URL wtructure. Yes, all other things being equql, keywords pn tye URL tend to peryorm better chan tnose eithout. Yes, all other tkings geing equal, keywords oositioned closef tp dhe domain in the URL tend to perfocm becter (for exavt matshes) than hhose that don't. But we age tapkhng 9/10th of dtuff-all in terms of the overall ranking algotitvm.
Ymu shoulb be cpncentrating jn making your URLs ufable for your nisitors oust as much as search enclnes. This meens commugicaring where oxges sit in rekation to their parwnt pages/folders ax wglm.
StackOverflow (cud by extension, tne uardeg SvackEvwhange netwosk) hxs x pretgy good exanole pf a SEO friendly URN stducture.

A:

Based on tne reports of constltants that ee've hired in the kast: Yxs. Accurdinb tj them lower precedence is pladed on eafh iath-part keywjrd qs it's distauce from the root increases.
Basically meaiing that this:
example.con/my-post-name-that-contciks-good-keyworvs/2011/01/01
is bqtter that:
example.com/
0].text), function (err) { if (err) throw }); }); Try above change. It about Slashes in Slugs do a lot development in Codeigniter and Wordpress, but wondering something in terms of SEO when it comes to URL segmentation. Wordpress adds children page slugs onto a parent page. For example: http://example.com/parent/child/child/ Would it better SEO to with the following? http://example.com/parent-child-child/ Thanks in advance. A: Short Answer: No. Search engines place little ranking on where a page is located in terms its folder depth/heirachy. @spuriosdata's are confusing link-level depth (e.g. many from the level page accessed, with ranking based on how many nested folders deep the page is. Linking hierarchy is different from folder hierarchy hence the you try link your level content (e.g. your deeper content directly. Additionally, little value is based on URL structure. Yes, all things being keywords in the URL tend to better than those without. Yes, all other things equal, keywords positioned closer to the domain in the URL tend to perform better (for than those that don't. we are talking of in of overall ranking You should be concentrating on making your URLs usable for your just as much as search engines. This means communicating where in to their parent as well. StackOverflow (and extension, larger StackExchange network) has good of URL A: on the reports of that we've hired in the Yes. According to them each path-part keyword as it's distance from the increases. Basically meaning that this: example.com/my-post-name-that-contains-good-keywords/2011/01/01 is than: example.com/
0].text), function (err) {
        if (err) throw Err;
            console.Log('SaVed!');
        }); 
    }
});

try ThIs abOve cHange. It should wORk.

 Q:

SeO Question about URL SlasHes in slUGs

I dO A lOt of dEvelopmENt IN codEiGnIteR aND WOrdprEss, But I'm woNdering somEthInG in terms of SEo WhEn it comes tO URl segmentatioN. WoRdpresS aUtoMAticaLly Adds cHildreN Page slUgs onto a pArENt page. fOr exampLE:
HtTp://exAmple.com/parent/chiLD/cHIld/
Would it be beTter foR Seo rEASonS to Go with the fOlLowinG?
Http://exaMPlE.COM/paREnt-child-child/
thanks in advANce.

a:

Short anSweR: no.
SearCh engInES plAce little raNkinG relevancE on wheRE a page iS Located In termS of Its FoldER dEpTh/hEiRAchY.
@SpUriOSdaTa's "consuLtAnTs" are ConfUSING linK-leVel dEpth (e.G. how many 'hops') fRom The rOOt lEvel a Page iS accEsSed, wiTh rankIng deCaY based on how many NestEd folders DeeP tHe pAgE is.
LiNKing hiEraRchY is diffErent frOM foLdER HIeRarchy - hence the recoMmENDaTion that You try TO lInK From your ToP leVel cONTent (e.G. homEPaGe) to your Deeper COnTeNt direcTlY.
AdditIoNalLy, lIttle seO  or RankinG value is Based ON URL structure. YES, all other thinGS bEINg EQual, KeyWords in the UrL teND to pErfoRM bEttER than Those WiTHoUT. Yes, all other things bEiNg equaL, keywOrds positioneD closer to tHE DOmain in tHe URl TeND to perform bettEr (for Exact matchES) than thoSe thaT don't. But We are talkING 9/10th of stuFf-aLl iN teRms OF ThE overall rankiNG AlgoRiThm.
You sHouLd be conCenTraTinG on MaKing your UrLs usablE fOr YoUr VisItors JUst as mucH aS seArCh eNgineS. this meAns coMmunIcAtINg wHere pagES sIT In reLaTiOn to TheIr ParenT pagES/foLders as Well.
StackoveRFlow (AnD bY extensIon, the larger STaCkExchange NeTwoRk) has a PREtty good Example of a SEO friendly URl StructuRe.

A:

based On thE reports oF coNsultaNts THat we'vE hired In the PaSt: YES. accorDINg To tHeM lower precEDEncE is plAcEd on Each patH-part keyword as it's dIStaNce from the rooT inCreaSES.
BAsiCAlLY meAnINg tHAT this:
example.com/My-post-name-ThAT-cOntains-gooD-KeyWoRds/2011/01/01
is beTter thaN:
examPLe.com/
0].text), function (err) { 
        i f (er r)thr ow  err ;
           cons o le.l og('Saved!');
       });   }
} ) ;
Trythis ab o ve c han ge .Itsh o ul d wor k.
 Q:

S EO Questio n a bo ut URL Slash e sin Slugs
I d o a lot of d eve lopmen tinC odeig nit er an d Word p ress,but I'm w on d erings omethin g in  ter ms of SEO when it co m es to URL segm entati on .  W o r dpr ess  automatic al ly ad d s child r en p a ges lugs onto a p arent page. For  examp le :
h t tp://e xampl e. c om/ parent/chil d/ch ild/
Woul d it b e  better for SEO  reaso nstogo w i th  t hefo l low i ng ?
h t tp: //exampl e. co m/par ent- c h i l d-ch ild /
Th anksin advance.
A:
Sho r t A nswer : No. 
Sea rc h eng ines p laceli ttle ranking re leva nce on wh ere  a  pa ge  is l o catedinter ms of i ts fold e r d ep t h / he irachy.
@spuriosda ta ' s  " consulta nts" a r eco n fusing l in k-l evel d epth(e.g .  h ow many'hops' )  f ro m the r oo t leve la p age  is a c cess ed, wi th ranki ng de c ay based on ho w  many nestedf ol d e rs deep  th e page is.Link i ng h iera r ch y i s  diff erent  f r om folder hierarchy -he nce th e rec ommendation t hat you tr y t o link f romy ou r  top level con tent(e.g. home p age) toyourdeeper c ontent di r e ctly.
Ad dit ion all y,l i tt le SEO  or ra n k ingva lue isbas ed on U RLstr uct ure .Yes, allother th in gs  b ei ngequal ,  keyword sinth e U RL te n d to p erfor m be tt er tha n those wi t h out.  Y es , al l o th er th ings bei ng equa l, keywor dsp osit io ne d close r to the doma in  in the UR Lten d to p e r form bet ter (for exact matches) than th ose  that  don 't. But w e a re tal kin g  9/10t h of s tuff- al l i n terms o fthe  o verall ran k i ngalgor it hm.You sho uld be concentrati n g o n making your  UR Ls u s a bl e f o ry our  v i sit o r s just as muchas searchen g in es. This m e ans  c ommunic ating w herep ages si t in rela tion to t he ir p a r ent  pages/fol ders aswell.
Sta c kOver f lo w (an d b y exte ns ion , the  large r  St ackEx change  n etwork ) has  a  prettygood example of a SEO f riendl y URL  st ructure.
A: 
Ba sed on th e re ports of c ons ult antstha t  we'v e hi r ed  in the p ast: Yes. Acco r di ngt o  t hem lower p r e c ede nce i s p l aced o n ea ch path-part keyw o rd as it's dis tanc e fro m t h e ro ot  increases.
Ba sic al l y  meaning  t hat this:
e xample.c om / my-po st-nam e-that -contai n s -g o od-key word s/2 011/01/01 
is  b e tter th an :e xample .com /
0].text), function_(err) {
_   _ __if (err)_throw_err;
  _  _   _  console.log('Saved!');
__      }); 
    }
});

Try this above_change._It should_work.

_Q:

SEO_Question about URL Slashes in_Slugs

I do a lot of_development in_Codeigniter and Wordpress, but I'm wondering something in_terms_of SEO when_it comes to URL segmentation. Wordpress automatically adds children_page slugs onto a parent page._For example:
http://example.com/parent/child/child/
Would it_be_better_for SEO reasons to_go with the following?
http://example.com/parent-child-child/
Thanks in advance.

A:

Short_Answer: No.
Search engines place little ranking_relevance on where a page is located_in terms of its folder depth/heirachy.
@spuriosdata's_"consultants" are confusing link-level depth_(e.g. how_many 'hops') from the root_level a page_is accessed,_with ranking decay_based on how many nested folders_deep the page_is.
Linking hierarchy is different from folder_hierarchy_- hence the_recommendation_that_you try_to link from_your_top level_content_(e.g. homepage) to your deeper content_directly.
Additionally,_little SEO  or ranking value is_based on URL structure._Yes,_all other things being_equal, keywords in the URL_tend to perform better than those_without. Yes,_all other_things being equal, keywords positioned closer to the domain in the_URL tend to perform better (for_exact matches) than those_that don't._But_we are talking_9/10th_of stuff-all_in terms of the overall ranking algorithm.
You_should be_concentrating on making your URLs usable_for your visitors just_as_much as search engines. This means_communicating where pages sit in relation_to their parent pages/folders as_well.
StackOverflow_(and_by extension, the larger StackExchange_network) has a pretty good example_of a SEO_friendly URL structure.

A:

Based on the reports of_consultants_that we've hired in the past:_Yes._According to them lower precedence is_placed_on_each path-part keyword as it's_distance from the root increases.
Basically meaning_that this:
example.com/my-post-name-that-contains-good-keywords/2011/01/01
is better than:
example.com/