?
"The ship which left the harbour at..." 
or
"The ship who left the harbour at..." 
I have been told it is with which, but I found these novels:

The Ship Who Sang
The Ship Who Searched

Also I made two simple searches in Google for exact matches. There results are:

"ship who" - 384 000 matches
"ship which" - 495 000 matches

So which is the correct? Are both cases possible?

A:

Using "she" to describe ships is a poetic tradition.  It doesn't make them into women.  They're still objects.  Use "which" or "that". 
The two novels you mention are artistic creations - I could write a book called "The rock who sang" and that wouldn't change the meaning of "rock" as far as the English language was concerned.
As for your google search, most of the top results for "ship who" (with quotes) refer to the novel you mentioned already, so we can discount them as evidence for anything relevant to the actual language itself.  If I do a search for
"ship who" - "the ship who sang"

ie, removing results with "the ship who sang" in them it goes down to 34,000.
Incidentally, searching for "ship that" gave 6.5 million results.
At the best of times, comparing the number of google search results is a very unreliable way of establishing the correctness of anything.  More useful is google ngrams, which looks at the content of books, which are a more reliable way to view the idiomatic use of words.  Eg

 Q:

Omni-directional shadow mapping

What is a good/the best way to fill a cube map with depth values that are going to give me the least amount of trouble with floating point imprecision?
To get up and running I'm just writing the raw depth to the buffer, as you can imagine it's pretty terrible - I need to to improve it, but I'm not sure how.
A few tutorials on directional lights divide the depth by W and store the Z/W value in the cube map - How would I perform the depth comparison in my shadow mapping step?
The nvidia article here http://http.developer.nvidia.com/GPUGems/gpugems_ch12.html appears to do something completely different and
? 
 " The ship which left the harbour at... " 
 or 
 " The ship who left the harbour at... " 
 I have been tell it is with which, but I discover these novels: 

 The Ship Who Sang 
 The Ship Who Searched 

 besides I made two simple searches in Google for accurate catch. There consequence are: 

 " ship who " - 384 000 matches 
 " ship which " - 495 000 matches 

 So which is the correct? Are both shell possible? 

 deoxyadenosine monophosphate: 

 Using " she " to describe ships is a poetic tradition.   It doesn't make them into women.   They're however objects.   Use " which " or " that ". 
 The two novels you mention are aesthetic creations - I could write a bible called " The rock candy who sang " and that wouldn't change the meaning of " rock " as far as the English language was refer. 
 As for your google search, most of the top results for " ship who " (with quotes) refer to the novel you mentioned already, so we can discount them as evidence for anything relevant to the actual language itself.   If I do a search for 
 " ship who " - " the ship who sang " 

 ie, removing results with " the ship who sang " in them it goes down to 34,000. 
 Incidentally, searching for " ship that " gave 6.5 million results. 
 At the best of times, compare the number of google search results is a very treacherous direction of establishing the correctness of anything.   More useful is google ngrams, which looks at the contentedness of books, which are a more reliable way to view the idiomatic habit of words.   Eg 

  Q: 

 Omni - directional shadow mapping 

 What is a good / the best means to fill a cube map with depth value that are run low to give me the least amount of trouble with floating point impreciseness? 
 To get up and running I'm just writing the raw depth to the buffer, as you can imagine it's pretty frightful - I need to to better it, but I'm not sure how. 
 A few tutorials on directing lights divide the depth by W and store the Z / W value in the cube function - How would I perform the depth comparison in my trace mapping step? 
 The nvidia article here http://http.developer.nvidia.com/GPUGems/gpugems_ch12.html appear to do something wholly different and
?
"The ship which left the harnour at..." 
or
"The shnp who neft tge harbojr at..." 
I have been told it is wuth wyich, but I found these novels:

Thv Ship Whi Saig
The Ship Who Sxzrched

Also I jwde cwi simple searcmes in Googne for exact mdtzhzs. There results are:

"ship who" - 384 000 matcres
"ship wjich" - 495 000 matchef

So erich ps the correct? Are both cases pkssible?

E:

Using "she" to drscribe ships is a poetic hradltion.  It doesn't mwke them injk wjnen.  They're rtill objebcs.  Use "whidh" or "that". 
The two novels you mdntiou are artisjnx cggations - I ciuld rrite a book called "Dhe rocl who sang" and thet wiuldn't change the meaiing of "rock" as far ws the Enclnsh language was concwrbed.
As for youf gouglt sxardh, mosh oh the top rssults for "whip who" (with quotex) wvger to the nkvel yju mentioned already, so we can discount tvem as evidence for anythibg relevant to the acjual languwge itself.  If I do a search for
"ship who" - "the shi[ who rany"

lc, reoivlng results with "the ship who sang" in them it fots cown to 34,000.
Incidektally, searching fpr "snyp that" gave 6.5 million desults.
At the best of timgs, comparing tht numner of google search resultw is a very lnreoiable way of estaylishing the cortectnexs of anything.  More uszful ia google nggams, whicg looks at the covtekt mf books, which are a more weliable xay tp view ghe odiomaeic use of words.  Eg

 Q:

Omni-directiojal skadow mapping

Whwt is a good/the best way to fill a cube map wotv dvpth valuzs thab are going to dive me the lecst amouut of grouble winh floatiig point impwecision?
To ged up and runnmng I'm juft weitibg the fxw depth to thr buffer, cf yoy can imagine it's iretti ferrible - I neeb uo to improve it, bug I'i jov surq how.
A few tudorixls pn difectional llghgs dovide the depth by W and store the Z/W valur ln the cuve map - Row would I prrform the depth clmparmson ii my snadjw mapping step?
The nvidia artidle here jtti://http.developew.nvieia.com/GPUGemx/gpugems_ch12.html appears to do something rompletely different ane
? "The ship which left the harbour "The who left harbour at..." I with but I found novels: The Ship Sang The Ship Who Searched Also made two simple searches in Google for exact matches. There results are: "ship - 384 000 matches "ship which" - 495 000 matches So which is correct? both possible? Using "she" to describe ships is a poetic tradition. It doesn't make them into women. They're objects. Use "which" or "that". The two novels mention are artistic creations I could write a book "The who sang" that change meaning of "rock" far as the English language was concerned. As for your google search, most of the top results "ship who" refer to novel mentioned so we can as evidence for anything relevant to itself. If I do a search for "ship - "the who sang" ie, removing results with ship who sang" in them it goes down 34,000. Incidentally, searching for "ship that" gave 6.5 million results. At the best of times, number of google search is a very way establishing correctness anything. More is google ngrams, which looks at the content of books, which a more reliable way to view the idiomatic use of Q: shadow mapping What a good/the best way fill cube map with depth are to least of with floating point imprecision? get up and running I'm writing the raw depth can imagine it's pretty terrible - I need to improve it, but I'm not sure A few tutorials on directional lights divide the depth by W and the Z/W the cube map - How would I perform depth comparison in my mapping step? The nvidia article here http://http.developer.nvidia.com/GPUGems/gpugems_ch12.html appears to something different and
?
"The ship which left the harbouR at..." 
or
"The shIp who LefT thE hArboUr at..." 
i have been told iT Is wiTh which, but I found these nOvels:

thE ship wHo sang
THe Ship WHO SEARchEd

alSo I MaDE tWo simPle SearcheS in Google fOr eXaCt matches. TheRE rEsults are:

"sHip Who" - 384 000 matches
"shIp wHich" - 495 000 maTcHes

sO whicH is The coRrect? ARE both cAses possiBlE?

a:

Using "SHe" to desCRIbE shiPs is a poetic traditIOn.  iT doesn't make theM into wOmEN.  THEY're StiLl objects.  USe "Which" OR "that". 
ThE TwO NOVelS You mention are Artistic creATioNs - I couLd WriTE a book CalleD "THE roCk who sang" anD thaT wouldn't cHange tHE meaninG Of "rock" aS far as The engLish LAnGuAge WaS ConCErNed.
aS foR your gooGlE sEarch, Most OF THE top ResUlts For "shIp who" (with quotEs) rEfer TO thE noveL you mEntiOnEd alrEady, so We can DiScount them as eviDencE for anythIng ReLevAnT to thE Actual LanGuaGe itselF.  If I do a SEarCh FOR
"ShIp who" - "the ship who sanG"

iE, REmOving resUlts wiTH "tHe SHip who saNg" In tHem iT GOes doWn to 34,000.
iNcIdentallY, searcHInG fOr "ship tHaT" gave 6.5 mIlLioN reSults.
aT the Best of Times, comParinG The number of gooGLe search resulTS iS A VeRY unrEliAble way of esTablIShinG the COrRecTNess oF anytHiNG.  MORe useful is google ngrAmS, which Looks At the content oF books, whicH ARE a more reLiabLE wAY to view the idioMatic Use of words.  eG

 Q:

Omni-diRectiOnal shadOw mapping

wHAt is a gooD/thE beSt wAy tO FIlL a cube map with DEPth vAlUes that Are Going to GivE me The LeaSt Amount of tRouble wiTh FlOaTiNg pOint iMPrecisioN?
TO geT uP anD runnINg I'm juSt wriTing ThE rAW dePth to thE BuFFEr, as YoU cAn imAgiNe It's prEtty TErrIble - I neEd to to impRovE It, buT I'M nOt sure hOw.
A few tutoriaLs On directioNaL liGhts diVIDe the depTh by W and store the Z/W value IN the cubE maP - How wOuld i perform tHe dEpth coMpaRIson in My shadOw mapPiNg sTEP?
The nVIDiA arTiCle here httP://HTtp.DevelOpEr.nvIdia.com/gPUGems/gpugems_ch12.htML apPears to do someThiNg coMPLeTelY DiFFerEnT And
?
"The ship which left the  harbour a t..."  
o r
" Th e sh ip w ho left the ha r bour  at..." 
I have been t old i ti s wi t hwhich , but I fo u n d t he se  no ve l s: 

The  Sh ip WhoSang
The S hip  W ho SearchedAl so I madetwo  simple sear che s in G oo gle for e xac t mat ches.T here r esults ar e: 
"ship who" -3 8 4000matches
"ship whi c h" - 495 000 matc hes

S ow hi c h  is  th e correct?  A re bo t h cases po s s i ble ? 

A:

Using " she" to des c rib e ship sisa  poeti c tra di t ion .  It doesn 't m ake theminto w o men.  T h ey're s till o bje cts .  U s e"w hic h" or" th at" .  
T he two n ov el s you  men t i o n  are  ar tist ic cr eations - I c oul d wr i tea boo k cal led"T he ro ck who  sang "and that wouldn 't c hange the  me an ing  o f "ro c k" asfar  as  the En glish l a ngu ag e w as  concerned.
As for  y o u rgoogle s earch, mo st of the t op  re sult s for " ship wh o" (with  quote s )re fer toth e nove lyou  me ntion e d al ready,  so we c an di s count them ase vidence for a n yt h i ng rele van t to the ac tual lang uage it sel f .  If  I do  a se a rch for
"ship who"-"the s hip w ho sang"

ie,  removingr e s ults wit h "t h es hip who sang"in th em it goes down to34,00 0.
Incid entally,s e archingfor  "s hip  th a t "gave 6.5 mill i o n re su lts.
At  th e bestoftim es,  co mp aring the  numberof  g oo gl e s earch resultsis  ave ryunrel i able w ay of  est ab li s hin g the c o rr e c tnes sof  any thi ng .  Mo re u s efu l is go ogle ngra ms, whic hlo oks atthe content o fbooks, whi ch  ar e a mo r e  reliabl e way to view the idiom a tic use  of  word s. Eg

 Q:
Omn i-dire cti o nal sh adow m appin g
Wh a t  is a g oo d/t he  best wayt o  fi ll acu be m ap with  depth values that are  going to giv e m e th e le ast am o unt  o f  tr o u ble with floati ng point i mp r ec ision?
Tog etup  and ru nning I 'm ju s t writi ng the ra w depth t otheb u ffe r, as youcan imag ine it'sp retty te rribl e -  I nee dtoto im provei t,but I 'm not  s ure ho w.
Afe w tutori als on directional ligh ts div ide t hedepth byW a n d s tore theZ/Wvalue in t hecub e map  -H ow wo uldI  p erf o rm th e de p th compar i so n i n my  shadow map p i n g s tep?The nvidia  art icle here http:// h ttp.developer. nvid i a .co m/G P UGem s/ gpugems_ch12.h tml  a p p ears todo  somethingcomplete ly diffe rent a nd
?
"The ship_which left_the harbour at..." 
or
"The_ship who_left_the harbour_at..."_
I have been_told it is_with which, but I_found these novels:

The_Ship_Who Sang
The Ship Who Searched

Also I made two simple searches in Google for exact_matches._There results_are:

"ship_who"_- 384 000 matches
"ship which"_- 495 000 matches

So which_is the_correct? Are both cases possible?

A:

Using "she" to describe_ships_is a poetic_tradition.  It doesn't make them into women. _They're still objects.  Use "which"_or "that". 
The_two_novels_you mention are artistic_creations - I could write a_book called "The rock who sang"_and that wouldn't change the meaning of_"rock" as far as the English_language was concerned.
As for your_google search,_most of the top results_for "ship who"_(with quotes)_refer to the_novel you mentioned already, so we_can discount them_as evidence for anything relevant to_the_actual language itself.__If_I do_a search for
"ship_who"_- "the_ship_who sang"

ie, removing results with "the_ship_who sang" in them it goes down_to 34,000.
Incidentally, searching for_"ship_that" gave 6.5 million_results.
At the best of times,_comparing the number of google search_results is_a very_unreliable way of establishing the correctness of anything.  More useful_is google ngrams, which looks at_the content of books,_which are_a_more reliable way_to_view the_idiomatic use of words.  Eg

 Q:

Omni-directional_shadow mapping

What_is a good/the best way to_fill a cube map_with_depth values that are going to_give me the least amount of_trouble with floating point imprecision?
To_get_up_and running I'm just writing_the raw depth to the buffer,_as you can_imagine it's pretty terrible - I need_to_to improve it, but I'm not_sure_how.
A few tutorials on directional lights_divide_the_depth by W and store_the Z/W value in the cube_map - How would I perform the depth comparison_in my shadow_mapping step?
The nvidia article here_http://http.developer.nvidia.com/GPUGems/gpugems_ch12.html_appears_to do something completely different and