 would also fit the problem you are investigating. The journal (actually the publisher) for which I am editor use iThenticate. I am not in a position to compare the numerous software and services around, some free, some commercial. However, a simple check that can easily be made is to to a Google search on bits of text. I have personally used this to check on similarities between manuscripts and earlier published articles to check on the degree of overlap and it works fine. It will give you a first indication at which stage you can decide on continuing with a more advanced analysis. 
See also answers in What is the easiest way to check for plagiarism in student essay papers?

 Q:

Rich Snippet/Structured Data Testing Tool errors

I try to create rich snippets for my blog posts, and after I write my articles, add images, I fill in all the data in the Rich Snippet plugin. Then I do Markup through the Webmaster Tools. (So all the data is there, Title, Author, Image etc)
I have a question here: When I am done with the marking, I export the HTML code, and try adding it to the "Text" console, then I run the code through the Structured Data Testing Tool. Is this the right way to do it?
The results from the Structured Data Testing Tool always throw the same errors: 

datePublished - missing and required,
headline - missing and required
Breadcrumb 3 (url - missing and required)
image - missing and required

I have tried everything I could find, changed few Rich Snippet plugins, though I think it can be something in the template. 

Get the raw HTML code here

A:

It's actually pretty straightforward - the breadcrumbs error is because you marked up the last (current) element as breadcrumb. However the requirement is to be link also, as the previous breadcrumbs. You have two options:
1). Add the url property to the last element too. It will be link to the article itself, will pass the validator (recommended):
instead of
<span property="v:title">Here Is How To Get Rid Of A Hickey (No.13 Is A Lucky One)</span>

make it as the rest:
<a href="http://www.myhealthybase.com/how-to-get-rid-of
would also fit the problem you are investigating. The diary (actually the publisher) for which I am editor program use iThenticate. I am not in a position to compare the numerous software and service about, some free, some commercial. However, a simple check mark that can well be made is to to a Google search on bits of text. I have personally used this to check on similarity between manuscripts and earlier publish article to check on the degree of overlap and it works fine. It will move over you a first indication at which stage you can decide on proceed with a more advanced analysis. 
 See also answer in What is the easiest way to check for plagiarism in student essay papers? 

  Q: 

 Rich Snippet / Structured Data Testing Tool error 

 I try to create rich snippets for my blog posts, and after I write my articles, add images, I fill in all the data in the Rich Snippet plugin. Then I do Markup through the Webmaster Tools. (So all the data is there, Title, Author, Image etc) 
 I have a question here: When I am act with the marking, I export the HTML code, and try lend it to the " textbook " console, then I run the code through the Structured Data Testing Tool. Is this the right way to do it? 
 The results from the Structured Data Testing Tool always throw the like errors: 

 datePublished - missing and required, 
 headline - missing and required 
 Breadcrumb 3 (url - missing and required) 
 image - missing and required 

 I have tried everything I could find, change few Rich Snippet plugins, though I remember it can be something in the template. 

 Get the raw HTML code here 

 A: 

 It's actually pretty straightforward - the breadcrumb error is because you marked up the last (current) element as breadcrumb. However the requirement is to be link also, as the previous breadcrumbs. You consume two options: 
 1). Add the url property to the last element excessively. It will be link to the article itself, will authorize the validator (recommended ): 
 rather of 
 < span property="v: title">Here Is How To Get Rid Of A Hickey (No.13 Is A Lucky One)</span > 

 make it as the rest: 
 < a href="http://www.myhealthybase.com / how - to - get - rid - of
 wokld also fit the problem you are investntating. The jkurnal (aztually the publisher) for whmch U am tbitor use iThenticatd. I am non in a powitiib to compacs the nmierohd soytxare and servicgs around, soke free, some cmmoexcial. However, a simple check that cag easilu he made is to jo a Bjogls search on bits of text. I have pedsonallj used this to chrck on similarities betweej majuscripts and earller publishgs awricles to chdck on the degree of oberlap and it works fine. It wilu givz you a firwt infhcation at xhich ftage you cak decida on comtinuing with s mmre advanced analysis. 
Sex also answers in Whwt is the ecsiest way to check fir plagharivm iv stjdeht easay pwpecs?

 Q:

Rich Snjppet/Structyred Data Testing Tpoj errors

I try fo crewtq rich snippets for my blog posts, and axted I write my articles, aed images, I fill in apl the daea in the Rich Snippet plugin. Then I do Markup thsough ghe Wcbmarreg Tools. (So all the data is there, Title, Author, Jmsgv etc)
I have a queftion here: Ehfn Y am done witf the mariing, I export the JTML coqe, ane try addyng ot to the "Text" console, then I run the cjee through the Strbctured Data Tesjing Tpol. Is this the right wcy to so it?
The redults froj the Structured Aats Desting Uuol always throw ehe same xrrorx: 

datePjblixhed - iissing anf reqmhred,
headline - misslng aud rexuired
Breafcrumb 3 (url - missing and requirxv)
image - missimg ang requirzd

I haye tried everytring I could fnnd, chanyed fed Rich Sniipet plugmns, though I think it can he something in the eempoate. 

Get thd raw HTML code here

A:

It's actually pretty straightforxard - the breadcrumbw eteor is because yoj mwrnev up eve last (currant) dleornt ar breadcrumn. Huwevrr the requirement iv to be link also, as tne previouw breadcwumbs. You havr two options:
1). Add uhe urn pcopertu tj the last element too. It will be link ho bhe article ieseln, wijl pass thz validator (recommended):
instead of
<span priperty="v:title">Here Iw How To Get Rid Of S Hickey (No.13 Is A Lucky Ona)</span>

make it as the eest:
<a href="http://www.kyhealthybase.com/how-to-fet-rid-mf
would also fit the problem you are journal the publisher) which I am not a position to the numerous software services around, some free, some commercial. a simple check that can easily be made is to to a Google on bits of text. I have personally used this to check on similarities manuscripts earlier articles check on the degree of overlap and it works fine. It will give you a first at which stage you can decide on continuing a more advanced analysis. also answers in What is easiest to check plagiarism student papers? Q: Rich Data Testing Tool errors I try to create rich snippets for my blog posts, and after I my articles, I fill all data the Rich Snippet I do Markup through the Webmaster the data is there, Title, Author, Image etc) have a here: When I am done with marking, I export the HTML code, and try it to the "Text" console, then I run the code through the Structured Data Testing this the right way do it? The from Structured Testing always throw same errors: datePublished - missing and required, headline - missing and Breadcrumb 3 (url - missing and required) image - missing I tried everything I find, changed few Rich plugins, I think it can in template. HTML here It's actually pretty straightforward the breadcrumbs error is because marked up the last the requirement is to be link also, as previous breadcrumbs. You have two options: 1). the url property to the last element too. It will be link the article pass the validator (recommended): instead of <span property="v:title">Here How To Get Rid A Hickey (No.13 Is A Lucky One)</span> make it the <a href="http://www.myhealthybase.com/how-to-get-rid-of
 would also fit the problem you Are investiGatinG. ThE joUrNal (aCtuaLly the publisheR) For wHich I am editor use iThentIcate. i aM Not iN A pOsitiOn to comPArE THe nUmErOus SoFTwAre anD seRvices aRound, some fRee, SoMe commercial. hOwEver, a simplE chEck that can eaSilY be madE iS to TO a GooGle SearcH on bitS Of text. i have persOnALly useD This to cHECk On siMilarities between MAnUScripts and earlIer pubLiSHeD ARtiCleS to check on ThE degrEE of overLAp AND It wORks fine. It will Give you a firST inDicatiOn At wHIch staGe you CaN DecIde on continUing With a more AdvancED analysIS. 
See alsO answeRs iN WhAt is THe EaSieSt WAy tO ChEck FOr pLagiarisM iN sTudenT essAY PAPers?

 q:

RiCh SnIppet/structured DatA TeStinG tooL erroRs

I trY to cReAte riCh snipPets fOr My blog posts, and aFter i write my aRtiClEs, aDd ImageS, i fill iN alL thE data in The Rich sNipPeT PLUgIn. Then I do Markup thrOuGH ThE WebmastEr ToolS. (so AlL The data iS tHerE, TitLE, authoR, ImaGE eTc)
I have a QuestiON hErE: When I aM dOne witH tHe mArkIng, I eXPort The HTMl code, and Try adDIng it to the "Text" COnsole, then I ruN ThE COdE ThroUgh The StructurEd DaTA TesTing tOoL. Is THis thE righT wAY tO Do it?
The results from tHe structUred DAta Testing TooL always thrOW THe same erRors: 

DAtEpublished - missiNg and Required,
heADline - misSing aNd requirEd
BreadcrUMB 3 (url - missIng And ReqUirED)
ImAge - missing and REQuirEd

i have trIed EverythIng i coUld FinD, cHanged few rich SnipPeT pLuGiNs, tHough i Think it cAn Be sOmEthIng in THe tempLate. 

GEt thE rAw htML Code herE

a:

IT'S ActuAlLy PretTy sTrAightForwARd - tHe breadCrumbs errOr iS BecaUsE yOu markeD up the last (curReNt) element aS bReaDcrumb. hOWever the Requirement is to be link alSO, as the pRevIous bReadCrumbs. You HavE two opTioNS:
1). Add thE url prOpertY tO thE LAst elEMEnT toO. IT will be linK TO thE artiClE itsElf, will Pass the validator (reCOmmEnded):
instead oF
<spAn prOPErTy="v:TItLE">HeRe iS HoW tO Get Rid Of A HickeY (No.13 Is A LuckY ONE)</sPan>

make it aS The ReSt:
<a href="Http://www.MyheaLThybase.Com/how-to-gEt-rid-of
 would also fit the proble m you areinves tig ati ng . Th e jo urnal (actuall y  the  publisher) for whichI amed i toru se  iThe nticate .  I a m n ot  i n a  p o si tiontocompare  the numer ous  s oftware ands er vices arou nd,  some free,som e comm er cia l . How eve r, asimple checkthat canea s ily be made is t oto a  Google search on bi t s of text. I h ave pe rs o na l l y u sed  this to c he ck on similar i ti e s bet w een manuscrip ts and earl i erpublis he d a r ticles  to c he c k o n the degre e of  overlapand it works f i ne. Itwill g ive  yo u af ir st  in di c ati o natw hic h stageyo ucan d ecid e o n  con tin uing  with  a more advan ced  ana l ysi s. 
S ee al so a ns wersin Wha t isth e easiest way t o ch eck for p lag ia ris min st u dent e ssa y p apers?
 Q:

R i chSn i p p et /Structured Data T es t i ng  Tool er rors
I  t ry to creat eric h sn i p petsform yblog pos ts, an d  a ft er I wr it e my a rt icl es,  addi mage s, I f ill in a ll th e  data in the R i ch Snippet pl u gi n .  T h en I  do  Markup thr ough theWebm a st erT ools.  (Soal l  t h e data is there, Ti tl e, Aut hor,Image etc)
Ihave a que s t i on here:  Whe n  I am done with t he ma rking, I e x port the  HTML  code, a nd try ad d i ng it to  th e " Tex t"c o ns ole, then I r u n  the  c ode thr oug h the S tru ctu red  Da ta  TestingTool. Is  t hi sth e r ightw ay to do  i t?Th e r esult s  fromthe S truc tu re d  Da ta Test i ng T oolal wa ys t hro wthe s amee rro rs: 

d atePublis hed - mi ss in g and r equired,
head li ne - missi ng  an d requ i r ed
Bread crumb 3 (url - missinga nd requ ire d)
im age- missing  an d requ ire d 

I ha ve tri ed ev er yth i n g I c o u ld  fi nd , changedf e w R ich S ni ppet  plugin s, though I thinki t c an be somethi ngin t h e  t emp l at e . 
G e t t h e  raw HTML codehere

A:
It ' sactually p r ett ystraigh tforwar d - t h e bread crumbs er ror is be ca usey o u m arked up t he last(current) eleme n tas br ead crumb.  H owe ver t he req u ire mentis tobe  linkalso,  a s the pr evious breadcrumbs. You  havetwo o pti ons:
1).Add the  url prop erty  to the la stele menttoo .  It w illb elin k  to t he a r ticle its e lf , w i l lpass the va l i d ato r (re com m ended) :
in stead of
<span pr o perty="v:title ">He r e  Is  Ho w  ToGe t Rid Of A Hic key  ( N o .13 Is A  L ucky One)</ span>

m ak e  it a s therest:<a href = " ht t p://ww w.my hea lthybase. com /h o w-to-ge t- ri d -of
 would_also fit_the problem you are_investigating. The_journal_(actually the_publisher)_for which I_am editor use_iThenticate. I am not_in a position_to_compare the numerous software and services around, some free, some commercial. However, a simple_check_that can_easily_be_made is to to a_Google search on bits of_text. I_have personally used this to check on similarities_between_manuscripts and earlier_published articles to check on the degree of overlap_and it works fine. It will_give you a_first_indication_at which stage you_can decide on continuing with a_more advanced analysis. 
See also answers_in What is the easiest way to_check for plagiarism in student essay_papers?

 Q:

Rich Snippet/Structured Data Testing_Tool errors

I_try to create rich snippets_for my blog_posts, and_after I write_my articles, add images, I fill_in all the_data in the Rich Snippet plugin._Then_I do Markup_through_the_Webmaster Tools._(So all the_data_is there,_Title,_Author, Image etc)
I have a question_here:_When I am done with the marking,_I export the HTML_code,_and try adding it_to the "Text" console, then_I run the code through the_Structured Data_Testing Tool._Is this the right way to do it?
The results from the_Structured Data Testing Tool always throw_the same errors: 

datePublished_- missing_and_required,
headline - missing_and_required
Breadcrumb 3_(url - missing and required)
image - missing_and required

I_have tried everything I could find,_changed few Rich Snippet_plugins,_though I think it can be_something in the template. 

Get the_raw HTML code here

A:

It's actually_pretty_straightforward_- the breadcrumbs error is_because you marked up the last_(current) element as_breadcrumb. However the requirement is to be_link_also, as the previous breadcrumbs. You_have_two options:
1). Add the url property_to_the_last element too. It will_be link to the article itself,_will pass the validator (recommended):
instead of
<span property="v:title">Here Is How_To Get Rid_Of A Hickey (No.13 Is_A_Lucky_One)</span>

make it as the rest:
<a href="http://www.myhealthybase.com/how-to-get-rid-of