 you are warned they absorb the square root of 2 in the definition!  At any moment, you make sure you appreciate what is actually being written in the analog of (1), and how the axial hadronic currents are normalized. The normalization of a pion component, however, is normally fixed.

Edit note. Indeed, the peculiar normalization of Weinberg vI (10.2.15) metastasizes to Weinberg vII (19.4.24) & (19.4.26), and, if you wished to compare to (1) here,  as he  notes in his footnote, $F_\pi=2f_\pi=186$MeV in our above discussion.  A mere change of language, but perfectly consistent. Indeed, if you were (quixotically) inclined to do phenomenology with Weinberg  (famous but not celebrated) normalizations, you'd have to build up a conversion table for all of such expressions. I have to reassure you, however, that the mainstream has shifted quite a bit since that book, and defined by the first group sampled.  

 Q:

How to update multi-rows in ORACLE with C# at once(one time IO) or it isn't impossible to happen

How to update data with difference condition and set,
it will be under one time Input and Output
For example as following      
Update set column1='1' where id=10;
Update set column1='2' where id=20;
Update set column1='3' where id=30;
  ......
Update set column1=N where id=N;

Please do me a favor to do this problem

PS: it is / isn't impossible to happen???

A:

Edit: Simplified the query little more.
And as mentioned in the comment, you should try running it on test data first before running on actual data. Or make sure your session doesn't auto commit the transaction and then run update/delte and after checking, rollback/commit the transaction.
Also as a best practice, run the where clause with select to see how many/what rows are getting returned.
update table
 set column1 = (case id
                when 10 then '1'
                when 20 then '2'
                when 30 then '3' 
                end)
    where id in (10,20,30)


you are warned they absorb the square root of 2 in the definition!   At any here and now, you name sure you appreciate what is actually being written in the analogue of (1), and how the axial hadronic currents are normalized. The standardization of a pion part, however, is normally fixed. 

 Edit note. Indeed, the peculiar normalization of Weinberg vI (10.2.15) metastasizes to Weinberg vII (19.4.24) & (19.4.26), and, if you wished to compare to (1) here,   as he   note in his footnote, $ F_\pi=2f_\pi=186$MeV in our above discussion.   A mere change of lyric, but absolutely consistent. Indeed, if you were (quixotically) inclined to cause phenomenology with Weinberg   (famous but not celebrated) standardization, you'd have to build up a conversion table for all of such expression. I have to reassure you, however, that the mainstream has shifted quite a snatch since that book, and specify by the first group sampled.  

  Q: 

 How to update multi - rows in ORACLE with C # at once(one time IO) or it isn't impossible to find 

 How to update data with difference condition and set, 
 it will be under one time Input and Output 
 For example as follow      
 Update set column1='1' where id=10; 
 Update set column1='2' where id=20; 
 Update set column1='3' where id=30; 
  ...... 
 Update set column1 = N where id = N; 

 Please do me a favor to do this problem 

 PS: it is / isn't impossible to happen? ?? 

 A: 

 Edit: Simplified the question little more. 
 And as mention in the comment, you should sample range it on test data foremost before running on actual datum. Or make sure your session doesn't auto entrust the transaction and then run update / delte and after checking, rollback / commit the transaction. 
 Also as a best practice, run the where clause with select to see how many / what rows are getting returned. 
 update mesa 
  set column1 = (font i d 
                 when 10 then' 1' 
                 when 20 then' 2' 
                 when 30 then' 3' 
                 end) 
     where i d in (10,20,30)
 yok are warned they absorb the square rooj if 2 in the dsfinitiov!  At any moment, you make suce yiu apkgeciate what is actuauly being written in uhe analog of (1), anv how thc axizp habrinic currents sre normalhzed. The normanixacion of a pion component, however, is gormallu vixed.

Edit note. Indted, the ieguliar normalization of Weinberg vI (10.2.15) meuastasizes to Weinnerg vII (19.4.24) & (19.4.26), and, if you wisjed ho compare to (1) herf,  as he  nites un his footnute, $F_\pi=2f_\pi=186$MeV in our agove discussion.  A mere change uf lauguage, but kzefefjly consisteit. Indved, if you wevv (quixodically) inclined to dp pienonenology with Weinberj  (famous but not cejebrated) toxmalizations, you'd havw ro buhld gp a xonxeraipn table foc all of sudh expressiins. I have to reassirq you, however, fhat tre mainstream has shifted quite a bit sinbe tgat book, and defined by the first group sampped.  

 Q:

Hor to update multi-rows in ORACLE with C# at once(one time KO) ir kr lsn't impossible to happen

How to update data wyfh dpfference conditijn and set,
iy aikj be under ong time Nhpht and Output
For edample ws foolowing      
Ipdate set column1='1' where id=10;
Update set cojymn1='2' where id=20;
Update set column1='3' whete id=30;
  ......
Update set column1=N whexe id=N;

Llease do mf a favor go do this probldm

PX: ht is / isn't impossible to rappen???

A:

Edmt: Sikplifiea thg query little moge.
And as mentioned in thf comlett, you shokld try running it on test data first before tuntinc on actbal daba. Or make sure your session boesn't abto coomit the tgansactioi and then rtn update/delta and after ciecking, rjllbqck/cimmit tfd transaction.
Akso as a ytst practixe, run the where ckaurs with select ti ste how many/what towr awe gxttind returned.
upddte gabur
 set column1 = (cawd id
                when 10 thsn '1'
                wmen 20 then '2'
                when 30 then '3' 
                env)
    wnerg id in (10,20,30)


you are warned they absorb the square 2 the definition! any moment, you is being written in analog of (1), how the axial hadronic currents are The normalization of a pion component, however, is normally fixed. Edit note. Indeed, peculiar normalization of Weinberg vI (10.2.15) metastasizes to Weinberg vII (19.4.24) & (19.4.26), if wished compare (1) here, as he notes in his footnote, $F_\pi=2f_\pi=186$MeV in our above discussion. A mere change language, but perfectly consistent. Indeed, if you were inclined to do phenomenology Weinberg (famous but not celebrated) you'd to build a table all of such I have to reassure you, however, that the mainstream has shifted quite a bit since that book, defined by group sampled. How update in ORACLE with once(one time IO) or it isn't How to update data with difference condition and it will under one time Input and Output example as following Update set column1='1' where id=10; set column1='2' where id=20; Update set column1='3' where id=30; ...... Update set column1=N where id=N; me a favor to this problem PS: is isn't to A: Edit: the query little more. And as mentioned in the comment, you try running it on test data first before running on Or sure your session auto commit the transaction then update/delte and after checking, transaction. as run where with select to see many/what rows are getting returned. table set column1 = '1' when 20 then '2' when 30 then end) where id in (10,20,30)
 you are warned they absorb the Square root Of 2 in tHe dEfiNiTion!  at anY moment, you make SUre yOu appreciate what is actuAlly bEiNG wriTTeN in thE analog OF (1), aND How ThE aXiaL hADrOnic cUrrEnts are Normalized. the NoRmalization oF A pIon componeNt, hOwever, is normAllY fixed.

edIt nOTe. IndEed, The peCuliar NOrmaliZation of WEiNBerg vI (10.2.15) MEtastasIZEs To WeInberg vII (19.4.24) & (19.4.26), and, if you WIsHEd to compare to (1) hEre,  as hE  nOTeS IN hiS foOtnote, $F_\pi=2f_\Pi=186$meV in OUr above DIsCUSSioN.  a mere change of Language, but PErfEctly cOnSisTEnt. IndEed, if YoU WerE (quixoticalLy) inClined to dO phenoMEnology WIth WeinBerg  (faMouS buT not CElEbRatEd) NOrmALiZatIOns, You'd have To BuIld up A conVERSIon tAblE for All of Such expressioNs. I Have TO reAssurE you, hOwevEr, That tHe mainStreaM hAs shifted quite a Bit sInce that bOok, AnD deFiNed by THe firsT grOup Sampled.  

 q:

How to uPDatE mULTI-rOws in ORACLE with C# at OnCE(OnE time IO) oR it isn'T ImPoSSible to hApPen

how tO UPdate Data WItH differeNce conDItIoN and set,
It Will be UnDer One Time INPut aNd OutpUt
For exaMple aS Following      
UpdatE Set column1='1' wherE Id=10;
uPDaTE set ColUmn1='2' where id=20;
UPdatE Set cOlumN1='3' WhEre ID=30;
  ......
UpdaTe set CoLUmN1=n where id=N;

Please do me A fAvor to Do thiS problem

PS: it iS / isn't imposSIBLe to happEn???

A:

EDIt: sImplified the quEry liTtle more.
AnD As mentioNed in The commeNt, you shouLD Try runniNg iT on TesT daTA FiRst before runnING on aCtUal data. or mAke sure YouR seSsiOn dOeSn't auto coMmit the tRaNsAcTiOn aNd theN Run updatE/dEltE aNd aFter cHEcking, RollbAck/cOmMiT The TransacTIoN.
aLso aS a BeSt prActIcE, run tHe whERe cLause wiTh select tO seE How mAnY/wHat rows Are getting retUrNed.
update tAbLe
 sEt coluMN1 = (Case id
                whEn 10 then '1'
                when 20 then '2'
                when 30 then '3' 
                eND)
    where iD in (10,20,30)


 you are warned they absor b the squa re ro otof2in t he d efinition!  At anymoment, you make sureyou a pp r ecia t ewhatis actu a ll y bei ng  w rit te n  i n the  an alog of  (1), andhow  t he axial had r on ic current s a re normalize d.The no rm ali z ation  of  a pi on com p onent,  however,  i s  norma l ly fixe d . 
Edit  note. Indeed, th e  p e culiar normali zation  o f  W e i nbe rgvI (10.2.1 5)  meta s tasizes to W e inb e rg vII (19.4. 24) & (19.4 . 26) , and,  i f y o u wish ed to  c o mpa re to (1) h ere,   as he notesi n his f o otnote,  $F_\p i=2 f_\ pi=1 8 6$ Me V i no ura bo ved isc ussion. A  m ere c hang e o f  lan gua ge,but p erfectly cons ist ent. Ind eed,if yo u we re  (qui xotica lly)in clined to do ph enom enology w ith  W ein be rg  ( f amousbut  no t celeb rated)n orm al i z a ti ons, you'd have to  b u i ld  up a co nversi o nta b le for a ll  of  suc h expre ssio n s.  I haveto rea s su re  you, h ow ever,th atthe  main s trea m hasshiftedquite a bit since th a t book, and d e fi n e db y th e f irst groupsamp l ed. 

Q :
Ho w  to u pdate  m u lt i -rows in ORACLE wit hC# atonce( one time IO)or it isn' t i mpossibl e to ha p pen

How to up datedata withd ifferenc e con dition a nd set,
i t will beund erone  ti m e  I nput and Outp u t 
For  e xampleasfollowi ng    Upd at e set col umn1='1'  w he re  i d=1 0;
Up d ate setco lum n1 ='2 ' whe r e id=2 0;
Up date  s et col umn1='3 '  w h e re i d= 30 ;
 ... .. .
Upd ates etcolumn1 =N whereid= N ;

P le as e do me  a favor to d othis probl em 

P S: iti s  / isn't  impossible to happen?? ? 

A:

E dit : Sim plif ied the q uer y litt lem ore.
A nd asmenti on edi n  thec o mm ent ,you should t ryrunni ng  iton test  data first before run ning on actua l d ata. O rmak e  s u reyo u r s e s sion doesn't au to committh e  t ransaction and  t hen run  update /delt e  and af ter check ing, roll ba ck/c o m mit  the trans action.Also as a bestp ra ctice , r un the  w her e cla use wi t h s elect  to se ehow ma ny/wh at  rows ar e getting returned.
upd ate ta ble
set  column1= ( c ase  id
              whe n 1 0 t hen ' 1'          w hen 2 0 th e n '2'
         when 30t h e n ' 3' 
           end)
    where i d  in (10,20,30) 


 you_are warned_they absorb the square_root of_2_in the_definition!_ At any_moment, you make_sure you appreciate what_is actually being_written_in the analog of (1), and how the axial hadronic currents are normalized. The_normalization_of a_pion_component,_however, is normally fixed.

Edit note._Indeed, the peculiar normalization of_Weinberg vI_(10.2.15) metastasizes to Weinberg vII (19.4.24) & (19.4.26),_and,_if you wished_to compare to (1) here,  as he _notes in his footnote, $F_\pi=2f_\pi=186$MeV in_our above discussion.__A_mere change of language,_but perfectly consistent. Indeed, if you_were (quixotically) inclined to do phenomenology_with Weinberg  (famous but not celebrated)_normalizations, you'd have to build up_a conversion table for all_of such_expressions. I have to reassure_you, however, that_the mainstream_has shifted quite_a bit since that book, and_defined by the_first group sampled.  

 Q:

How_to_update multi-rows in_ORACLE_with_C# at_once(one time IO)_or_it isn't_impossible_to happen

How to update data with_difference_condition and set,
it will be under one_time Input and Output
For_example_as following  _   
Update set_column1='1' where id=10;
Update set column1='2' where_id=20;
Update set_column1='3' where_id=30;
  ......
Update set column1=N where id=N;

Please do me a favor_to do this problem

PS: it is_/ isn't impossible to_happen???

A:

Edit: Simplified_the_query little more.
And_as_mentioned in_the comment, you should try running it_on test_data first before running on actual_data. Or make sure_your_session doesn't auto commit the transaction_and then run update/delte and after_checking, rollback/commit the transaction.
Also as_a_best_practice, run the where clause_with select to see how many/what_rows are getting_returned.
update table
 set column1 = (case id
__     __     __when_10 then '1'
  _     _       when 20_then '2'
 _    ___       when 30 then_'3' 
_  _         _  end)
    where_id in (10,20,30)

