2 = data[r(end, -2, 1), full];
data = data[r(0, 2, end), full].Concat(data[r(end, -2, 1), full], 0);
ILArray<complex> dct = weights * fft(data);

data is a <16384x1 double> and d1 and d2 are <8192x1 double> and the sizes between both versions match. But when I check d1's and d2's max() values, against IL's version, they aren't the same. And the values I get from fft(data) don't match either.
Are my ILNumerics indexing offsets wrong or something else?

A:

Found my bug, it was an off-by-one error located earlier in the code. The idea to use ILMatFile, suggested by @haymonkutschbach, helped me tracked it down. See comments above.
Edit: the test I used was dif = data[abs(data - dataFromMatlab) > 0.000000000000001 ]

 Q:

How to count all the rows of a table from a query with some filters who has a limit?

I will try to be more specific, let's suppose that i have this query:
SELECT * FROM users WHERE status = 1 LIMIT 5;
In my table users i have 40 users who has the status = 5, but in my query i'm limiting to 5, and that's fine, that's what i want to do.
But now, i need to count all users (without limit) who has the status = 1, in this case, 40 users has that status.
How can i do that without make another query?
I don't want to make other query 'cause in the query that i'm really working i have more filters, and i think that make double query with the same filters (except for the limit) is spent innecesary resources from my server.
Also i don't want to remove the LIMIT 5 from my query and take 5 in the code 'cause i have too many users with that status, and get all those users just for count it is innecesary,
I think there must be a better way to do it, can you help me?

A:

If you are using a recent version of MariaDB or MySQL 8+, then you may
2 = data[r(end, -2, 1), full ]; 
 data = data[r(0, 2, end), full].Concat(data[r(end, -2, 1), full ], 0); 
 ILArray < complex > dct = weight * fft(data); 

 datum is a < 16384x1 double > and d1 and d2 are < 8192x1 double > and the size between both version match. But when I check d1's and d2's max () value, against IL's translation, they aren't the same. And the values I get from fft(data) don't match either. 
 Are my ILNumerics indexing outgrowth wrong or something else? 

 A: 

 find oneself my bug, it was an off - by - one error located earlier in the code. The idea to use ILMatFile, propose by @haymonkutschbach, helped me tracked it down. See gossip above. 
 Edit: the test I used was dif = data[abs(data - dataFromMatlab) > 0.000000000000001 ] 

  Q: 

 How to count all the row of a table from a query with some filters who has a limit? 

 I will judge to be more specific, let's suppose that i have this query: 
 SELECT * FROM users WHERE condition = 1 LIMIT 5; 
 In my mesa users i have 40 users who has the status = 5, but in my query i'm limiting to 5, and that's fine, that's what i want to make. 
 But now, i need to reckon all drug user (without limit) who has the status = 1, in this shell, 40 users has that status. 
 How can i do that without create another query? 
 I don't want to make other question'cause in the query that i'm really working i have more filters, and i think that make bivalent question with the like filters (except for the limit) is spent innecesary resources from my server. 
 Also i don't want to remove the LIMIT 5 from my question and take 5 in the code'cause i own too many users with that condition, and get all those users just for count it is innecesary, 
 I think there must be a better manner to do it, can you help oneself me? 

 A: 

 If you are practice a recent interpretation of MariaDB or MySQL 8 +, then you may
2 = dwta[r(end, -2, 1), full];
data = data[v(0, 2, end), full].Concaj(dqta[r(env, -2, 1), fulm], 0);
ILArrah<complex> dct = weights * fft(dava);

dara is a <16384x1 double> and d1 and a2 are <8192x1 dluble> ane tht sizes between both versljns jwtch. Uut when I checl d1's and d2'v max() values, acakndt IL's version, they aren't the same. Wnd the vwlues I get frjm fge(datz) don't match either.
Are my ILNumerids indeqing offsets wronb or something else?

A:

Found ly bkg, it was an off-by-lne error licatqe earlier in the code. Uhz idea to uae ILMatFile, suggested by @haymovkutsehbach, helpgb me jracked it diwn. Sve comments anpve.
Edid: the trst I used was dih = dqta[abs(data - dataFromMetlab) > 0.000000000000001 ]

 Q:

How to cougt all tha xows of a table from q wuery witv soow fklttrs wgo has a mimit?

I wilm try to be more specific, let's stilose that i gave trif query:
SELECT * FROM users WHERE status = 1 LJMIT 5;
In my table users u have 40 users who has the statts = 5, but in my query i'm limiting to 5, and that's fite, thet'r wkqt i dqnh to do.
But now, i need to count all users (withjht lpmit) who has the ftatus = 1, in tjix case, 40 users fas thcf atatus.
How can i do that wythour make anjthet query?
I don't want to make ither query 'bausw in the query thac i'm really corkinb i hsve more filters, and i chink fhat make dluble quedh with the same wilners (except for the limit) is s[ent inneresarv resourzes grom mr server.
Aldo i don't want to remove the PIKIT 5 from ly query and take 5 in the code 'reuse i have tpo maty users with that status, wnd get all thpse usexs jusg for counn it is iinecesary,
I trink there muvj be a better way to qo ir, cab you hdup me?

A:

If you ate using c recwnt version of MarlaDB ud MySQL 8+, then yiu nay
2 = data[r(end, -2, 1), full]; data 2, full].Concat(data[r(end, -2, full], 0); ILArray<complex> data a <16384x1 double> d1 and d2 <8192x1 double> and the sizes between versions match. But when I check d1's and d2's max() values, against IL's they aren't the same. And the values I get from fft(data) don't match Are ILNumerics offsets or something else? A: Found my bug, it was an off-by-one error located earlier in the The idea to use ILMatFile, suggested by @haymonkutschbach, me tracked it down. comments above. Edit: the test used dif = - > ] Q: How count all the rows of a table from a query with some filters who has a limit? will try more specific, suppose i this query: SELECT users WHERE status = 1 LIMIT table users i have 40 users who has status = but in my query i'm limiting 5, and that's fine, that's what i want do. But now, i need to count all users (without limit) who has the status in this case, 40 has that status. can do without another query? don't want to make other query 'cause in the query that really working i have more filters, and i think that query the same filters for the limit) is innecesary from my server. Also want remove from query take 5 in the 'cause i have too many with that status, and for count it is innecesary, I think there be a better way to do it, you help me? A: If you are using a recent version of or MySQL you may
2 = data[r(end, -2, 1), full];
data = data[r(0, 2, end), fUll].Concat(dAta[r(eNd, -2, 1), fUll], 0);
iLarraY<comPlex> dct = weights * FFt(daTa);

data is a <16384x1 double> and d1 anD d2 are <8192X1 dOUble> ANd The siZes betwEEn BOTh vErSiOns MaTCh. but whEn I Check d1's And d2's max() vaLueS, aGainst IL's verSIoN, they aren't The Same. And the vaLueS I get fRoM ffT(Data) dOn't Match Either.
aRe my ILnumerics iNdEXing ofFSets wroNG Or SomeThing else?

A:

Found my BUg, IT was an off-by-one Error lOcATeD EArlIer In the code. THe Idea tO Use ILMaTfiLE, SUggESted by @haymonkUtschbach, heLPed Me tracKeD it DOwn. See CommeNtS AboVe.
Edit: the teSt I uSed was dif = Data[abS(Data - datAfromMatLab) > 0.000000000000001 ]

 Q:

HoW to CouNt alL ThE rOws Of A TabLE fRom A QueRy with soMe FiLters Who hAS A LImit?

i wiLl trY to be More specific, lEt's SuppOSe tHat i hAve thIs quErY:
SELEcT * FROM Users wHeRE status = 1 LIMIT 5;
IN my tAble users I haVe 40 UseRs Who haS The staTus = 5, But In my queRy i'm limITinG tO 5, AND tHat's fine, that's what i WaNT To Do.
But now, I need tO CoUnT All users (WiThoUt liMIT) who hAs thE StAtus = 1, in thIs case, 40 USeRs Has that StAtus.
HoW cAn i Do tHat wiTHout Make anOther queRy?
I doN'T want to make othER query 'cause in THe QUErY That I'm rEally workinG i haVE morE filTErS, anD I thinK that MaKE dOUble query with the samE fIlters (ExcepT for the limit) iS spent inneCESAry resouRces FRoM My server.
Also i dOn't waNt to remove THe LIMIT 5 fRom my Query and Take 5 in the CODe 'cause i HavE toO maNy uSERs With that statuS, ANd geT aLl those UseRs just fOr cOunT it Is iNnEcesary,
I tHink therE mUsT bE a BetTer waY To do it, caN yOu hElP me?

a:

If yoU Are usiNg a reCent VeRsIOn oF MariaDb Or mYsQL 8+, tHeN yOu maY
2 = data[r(end, -2, 1), fu ll];
data= dat a[r (0,  2 , en d),full].Concat(d a ta[r (end, -2, 1), full], 0 );
IL Ar r ay<c o mp lex>dct = w e ig h t s *  f ft (da ta ) ;
data  is  a <163 84x1 doubl e>an d d1 and d2a re  <8192x1 d oub le> and thesiz es bet we enb oth v ers ionsmatch. But wh en I chec kd 1's an d  d2's m a x ()  val ues, against IL's ve r sion, they are n't th es am e .  An d t he valuesIget f r om fft( d at a ) don ' t match eithe r.
Are my I L Num ericsin dex i ng off setswr o ngor somethin g el se?

A:
Foundm y bug,i t was a n off- by- one  err o rlo cat ed ear l ie r i n  th e code.Th eideato u s e I LMat Fil e, s ugges ted by @haymo nku tsch b ach , hel ped m e tr ac ked i t down . See  c omments above.Edit : the tes t I  u sed  w as di f  = dat a[a bs( data -dataFro m Mat la b ) >0.000000000000001]Q: 

How to  count al lt he rowsof  atabl e froma qu e ry  with so me fil t er swho has  a  limit ?
Iwil l try to b e more  specifi c, le t 's suppose tha t  i have thisq ue r y :S ELEC T *  FROM users  WHE R E st atus =1 L I MIT 5 ;
Inmy ta b le users i have 40us ers wh o has  the status =  5, but in m y  query i 'm l i mi t ing to 5, andthat' s fine, th a t's what  i wa nt to do .
But now , i need t o c oun t a llu s er s (without li m i t) w ho  has th e s tatus =  1,  in  th isca se, 40 us ers hasth at  s ta tus .
How can i do  t hat  w ith out m a ke ano therquer y? 
I don 't want to m akeot he r qu ery  ' cause  int hequery t hat i'm r eal l y wo rk in g i hav e more filter s,  and i thi nk  th at mak e double q uery with the same filt e rs (exc ept  forthelimit) is  sp ent in nec e sary r esourc es fr om  my s erver . Al soidon't want t o r emove  t he L IMIT 5from my query andt ake  5 in the cod e ' caus e ihav e  t o o m an y  us e r s with that sta tus, and g et al l those us e rsju st forcount i t isi nnecesa ry,
I thi nk theremu st b e a b etter wayto do it , can you helpm e? 

A:
If  you a re  us ing a  recen t  ve rsion  of Ma ri aDB or  MySQ L8+, then  you may
2 =_data[r(end, -2,_1), full];
data = data[r(0,_2, end),_full].Concat(data[r(end,_-2, 1),_full],_0);
ILArray<complex> dct =_weights * fft(data);

data_is a <16384x1 double>_and d1 and_d2_are <8192x1 double> and the sizes between both versions match. But when I check_d1's_and d2's_max()_values,_against IL's version, they aren't_the same. And the values_I get_from fft(data) don't match either.
Are my ILNumerics indexing_offsets_wrong or something_else?

A:

Found my bug, it was an off-by-one error located_earlier in the code. The idea_to use ILMatFile,_suggested_by_@haymonkutschbach, helped me tracked_it down. See comments above.
Edit: the_test I used was dif =_data[abs(data - dataFromMatlab) > 0.000000000000001 ]

 Q:

How_to count all the rows of_a table from a query_with some_filters who has a limit?

I_will try to_be more_specific, let's suppose_that i have this query:
SELECT *_FROM users WHERE_status = 1 LIMIT 5;
In my_table_users i have_40_users_who has_the status =_5,_but in_my_query i'm limiting to 5, and_that's_fine, that's what i want to do.
But_now, i need to_count_all users (without limit)_who has the status =_1, in this case, 40 users_has that_status.
How can_i do that without make another query?
I don't want to make_other query 'cause in the query_that i'm really working_i have_more_filters, and i_think_that make_double query with the same filters (except_for the_limit) is spent innecesary resources from_my server.
Also i don't_want_to remove the LIMIT 5 from_my query and take 5 in_the code 'cause i have_too_many_users with that status, and_get all those users just for_count it is_innecesary,
I think there must be a better_way_to do it, can you help_me?

A:

If_you are using a recent version_of_MariaDB_or MySQL 8+, then you_may