 to Stack Overflow's guidelines/expectations, you cannot answer the question in its current state.
You have two choices:

If you're willing, the task is reasonable in scope, and by doing so the finished product would be an otherwise on-topic, answerable question for Stack Overflow, you can edit the question yourself to transcribe the image into text.

or

You can simply cast a vote to close the question as "a community-specific reason → needs debugging details", which provides the following guidance to the asker:

Questions seeking debugging help ("why isn't this code working?") must include the desired behavior, a specific problem or error and the shortest code necessary to reproduce it in the question itself. Questions without a clear problem statement are not useful to other readers. See: How to create a Minimal, Reproducible Example.

This guidance/explanation pretty much covers that the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem must appear in the question itself. If you like, you can also leave a comment explaining that we do not allow images of code, and that the asker needs to paste the code into the question as text. A comment I sometimes use for this goes as follows:

Please add code and errors as text (using code formatting), not images. Images are problematic for many reasons, including that they don't allow copy-pasting text for testing or searching.

So, basically…yes:

In such a case, should we stand on principle and ask the user to repost as text? I fear that by doing this, we just drive away first-time posters.

I do not believe that this will drive away first-time posters. They are invested in getting an answer, so they'll simply do the little chore or jump over the little hurdle that we're asking them to do. Hopefully, next time, they will have this requirement in mind and thus avoid making the same mistake again. In the meantime, we've all done our part to ensure that the question is useful to others in the future, which is the true purpose of this site. (Remember that Stack Overflow is not a help desk. Our mission is not so much to help the asker, but rather to build up a library of high-quality Q&A on programming topics. Helping the asker is a nice side benefit, but our model is much more akin to Wikipedia than some hypothetical HireAProgrammer.com.)
to Stack Overflow's guidelines / expectations, you cannot answer the question in its current department of state. 
 You take two choices: 

 If you're willing, the task is fair in scope, and by doing so the finished merchandise would be an otherwise on - topic, answerable doubt for Stack Overflow, you can edit the question yourself to transcribe the trope into text. 

 or 

 You can simply frame a right to vote to close the question as " a residential district - specific reason → need debug details ", which provides the following steering to the asker: 

 Questions seeking debugging help (" why isn't this code work? ") must include the desired behavior, a specific problem or error and the short code necessary to reproduce it in the question itself. Questions without a clear problem instruction are not useful to other readers. See: How to create a Minimal, Reproducible Example. 

 This guidance / explanation pretty much covers that the shortest code necessary to regurgitate the trouble must appear in the question itself. If you like, you can besides bequeath a comment explaining that we do not allow images of code, and that the asker needs to paste the code into the doubt as text. A comment I sometimes use for this goes as follows: 

 Please add code and error as text (using code formatting), not images. picture are debatable for many reasons, including that they don't allow transcript - pasting text for testing or searching. 

 So, basically … yes: 

 In such a case, should we stand on principle and ask the drug user to repost as text? I reverence that by doing this, we just drive away first - clock time posters. 

 I do not think that this will drive away inaugural - time posters. They are invest in getting an solution, so they'll simply do the little job or jump over the little hurdle that we're asking them to dress. Hopefully, following time, they will have this prerequisite in mind and thus keep off making the same mistake again. In the meantime, we've all done our part to ensure that the question is useful to others in the future, which is the true function of this web site. (Remember that Stack Overflow is not a help desk. Our mission is not so much to help the asker, but rather to build up a library of eminent - quality Q&A on programming topics. help oneself the asker is a nice side benefit, but our model is much more akin to Wikipedia than some conjectural HireAProgrammer.com. )
 to Stack Overflow's guidelikes/expectations, ioy cannmt ansser the duestion in its current statx.
You have two choices:

If you're wklling, thv task is reawinable in scope, and by dklng sm the finished kroduct woulg be an otherwhsd ln-topic, answerable question for Stask Overgllw, you can edij the zuesfpok yourself to transcribe the imafe into text.

or

You cam simply cast a vote to cllse hhe question as "a fommunity-spgdifyx reason → nedds debuggpug details", shich provides the following gukdancz to the asjee:

Qufvtions seekmng defugging help ("why isn'd this vode working?") mmst iicluee the desired behavimr, a specific probjem or ersox and the shortest coee necevsarf to eepfodhcx if in tje suestion ifself. Questuons without a cleat [gpblem statemsnt arq got useful to other readers. See: How to breafe a Minimal, Reproduciboe Example.

This guidanfe/explanaeion pretty much covers that the shortest code newessacy to rcproaycf the problem must appear in the question itsqmf. In you like, you ccn also leave a volmrgt explaining that cs so not allow imaged of coqe, ane that tht askrr needs to paste the code unto the quefrion as text. A comlent I somecimes ose fot this goes as follows:

Pueass add code wnd errora as text (using cude fmrmatting), not images. Imagef are proulemacic for oany reasogs, includijg that they don't allow fopy-pcstinc text for testing or searching.

So, basically…yes:

In such a cdse, should ce stakd on principle and ask the uxer to xepost as text? I fear tiat by doing this, we just frive away fmrst-time [ostwrs.

I do not celieve that tnis will bxive away first-time posters. Thgy are invested iu tetting an answrr, ro ehvy'lk fhmply do the litgle vhore or jumk oyer the little hurdle that fe're asking them to do. Hjpefully, next tiie, they will nave this requiremtnt in miid and thos avoid making the same mistaks again. Ij tme meantime, wq've qll done our part to ensure that the question is usxful to others in the fyture, which is the jrut purpose of vhis syte. (Rememter that Stack Overfoow is not a help desk. Our mission is hot so much to help the asker, but rather to build up a library of high-quality Q&A on programming topics. Helling nhe csker if a iire side benefit, blt our model is much more akin tu Wikipegic than some hypothetical HireSPfogrammer.com.)
to Stack Overflow's guidelines/expectations, you cannot answer in current state. have two choices: is in scope, and doing so the product would be an otherwise on-topic, question for Stack Overflow, you can edit the question yourself to transcribe the into text. or You can simply cast a vote to close the question "a reason needs details", which provides the following guidance to the asker: Questions seeking debugging help ("why isn't this working?") must include the desired behavior, a specific or error and the code necessary to reproduce it the itself. Questions a problem are not useful other readers. See: How to create a Minimal, Reproducible Example. This guidance/explanation pretty much covers that the code necessary the problem appear the itself. If you can also leave a comment explaining not allow images of code, and that the needs to the code into the question as A comment I sometimes use for this goes follows: Please add code and errors as text (using code formatting), not images. Images are many reasons, including that don't allow copy-pasting for or So, In such case, should we stand on principle and ask the user to as text? I fear that by doing this, we just first-time I do not that this will drive first-time They are invested in answer, they'll little or over the little hurdle we're asking them to do. next time, they will and thus avoid making the same mistake again. the meantime, we've all done our part ensure that the question is useful to others in the future, which the true this site. (Remember that Stack Overflow is not help desk. Our mission not so much to help the asker, but rather build a library high-quality Q&A on topics. Helping the is a nice but our is more than some hypothetical HireAProgrammer.com.)
 to Stack Overflow's guidelineS/expectatiOns, yoU caNnoT aNsweR the Question in its cURrenT state.
You have two choiceS:

If yoU'rE WillINg, The taSk is reaSOnABLe iN sCoPe, aNd BY dOing sO thE finishEd product wOulD bE an otherwise ON-tOpic, answerAblE question for staCk OverFlOw, yOU can eDit The quEstion YOurselF to transcRiBE the imAGe into tEXT.

oR

You Can simply cast a votE To CLose the questioN as "a coMmUNiTY-SpeCifIc reason → neEdS debuGGing detAIlS", WHIch PRovides the folLowing guidaNCe tO the asKeR:

QuEStions SeekiNg DEbuGging help ("whY isn'T this code WorkinG?") Must incLUde the dEsired BehAviOr, a sPEcIfIc pRoBLem OR eRroR And The shortEsT cOde neCessARY TO repRodUce iT in thE question itseLf. QUestIOns WithoUt a clEar pRoBlem sTatemeNt are NoT useful to other rEadeRs. See: How tO crEaTe a miNimal, rEproduCibLe EXample.

THis guidANce/ExPLANaTion pretty much coveRs THAt The shortEst codE NeCeSSary to rePrOduCe thE PRobleM musT ApPear in thE questIOn ItSelf. If yOu Like, yoU cAn aLso Leave A CommEnt expLaining tHat we DO not allow imageS Of code, and that THe ASKeR NeedS to Paste the codE intO The qUestIOn As tEXt. A coMment i sOMeTImes use for this goes aS fOllows:

pleasE add code and erRors as text (USINg code foRmatTInG), Not images. ImageS are pRoblematic FOr many reAsons, IncludinG that they DON't allow cOpy-PasTinG teXT FoR testing or seaRCHing.

so, BasicalLy…yEs:

In sucH a cAse, ShoUld We Stand on prInciple aNd AsK tHe UseR to rePOst as texT? I FeaR tHat By doiNG this, wE just DrivE aWaY FirSt-time pOStERS.

I do NoT bElieVe tHaT this Will DRivE away fiRst-time poSteRS. TheY aRe InvesteD in getting an aNsWer, so they'lL sImpLy do thE LIttle choRe or jump over the little huRDle that We'rE askiNg thEm to do. HopEfuLly, nexT tiME, they wIll havE this ReQuiREMent iN MInD anD tHus avoid maKINg tHe samE mIstaKe again. in the meantime, we've aLL doNe our part to enSurE thaT THe QueSTiON is UsEFul TO Others in the futuRe, which is tHe TRuE purpose of THis SiTe. (RememBer that stack oVerflow Is not a helP desk. Our mIsSion IS Not So much to heLp the askEr, but rathER to buILd Up a liBraRy of hiGh-QuaLity Q&a on proGRamMing tOpics. HElPing thE askeR iS a nice siDe benefit, but our model is mUch morE akin To WIkipedia tHan SOme HypothetiCal HIreAPrograMmeR.coM.)
 to Stack Overflow's guide lines/expe ctati ons , y ou  can notanswer the que s tion  in its current state. 
Youha v e tw o  c hoice s:

Ify ou ' r e w il li ng,  t h etaskisreasona ble in sco pe,  a nd by doings othe finish edproduct woul d b e an o th erw i se on -to pic,answer a ble qu estion fo rS tack O v erflow, y ou  can  edit the questio n  y o urself to tran scribe  t h ei m age  in to text.
or 

You can sim p ly c a sta  vote to clos e the quest i onas "aco mmu n ity-sp ecifi cr eas on → needsdebu gging det ails", which p r ovidesthe fo llo win g gu i da nc e t ot hea sk er: 
Qu estionsse ek ing d ebug g i n g  hel p ( "why  isn' t this code w ork ing? " ) m ust i nclud e th edesir ed beh avior ,a specific prob lemor errorand  t hesh ortes t  codenec ess ary toreprodu c e i ti n th e question itself.  Q u e st ions wit hout a cl ea r  problem  s tat emen t are n ot u s ef ul to ot her re a de rs . See:Ho w to c re ate  aMinim a l, R eprodu cible Ex ample . 

This guidanc e /explanationp re t t ym uchcov ers that th e sh o rtes t co d enec e ssary  to r ep r od u ce the problem must  a ppearin th e question it self. If y o u like, yo u ca n  a l so leave a com mentexplaining that wedo no t allowimages of c ode, and  th atthe  as k e rneeds to past e theco de into  th e quest ion  as  te xt.  A  commentI someti me sus efor  this goes asfo llo ws :
Pleas e  add c ode a nd e rr or s  as  text ( u si n g  cod efo rmat tin g) , not  ima g es.  Images  are prob lem a ticfo rmany re asons, includ in g that the ydon 't all o w  copy-pa sting text for testingo r searc hin g.

S o, b asically… yes :

Insuc h  a cas e, sho uld w esta n d  on p r i nc ipl eand ask th e use r tore post  as tex t? I fear that byd oin g this, we ju stdriv e aw ayf ir s t-t im e  po s t ers.

I do notbelieve th at th is will dr i veaw ay firs t-timeposte r s. They  are inve sted in g et ting a n a nswer, sothey'llsimply do the l i tt le ch ore  or ju mp  ov er th e litt l e h urdle  thatwe 're as kingth em to do . Hopefully, next time,  theywillhav e this re qui r eme nt in min d an d thus avo idmak ing t hes ame m ista k eaga i n. In  the meantime, we 've a ll  done our p a r t  to  ensu ret hat th e qu estion is usefult o others in th e fu t u re,  wh i ch i sthe true purpo seof t his site .(Remember t hat Stac kO verfl ow isnot ahelp de s k .O ur mis sion  is  not so m uch  t o  help t he  a s ker, b ut r at her to  build up a l ibrary of high-q ualit y Q&A o n  pr ogram mi ng topi c s. H elping the  asker is a  niceside  bene fit, bu tour mo del  i s much mor e  akin toWikip edia th an  som e h ypothe tica l HireA Prog ra mme r.com.)
 to_Stack Overflow's_guidelines/expectations, you cannot answer_the question_in_its current_state.
You_have two choices:

If_you're willing, the_task is reasonable in_scope, and by_doing_so the finished product would be an otherwise on-topic, answerable question for Stack Overflow,_you_can edit_the_question_yourself to transcribe the image_into text.

or

You can simply cast_a vote_to close the question as "a community-specific reason_→_needs debugging details",_which provides the following guidance to the asker:

Questions seeking_debugging help ("why isn't this code_working?") must include_the_desired_behavior, a specific problem_or error and the shortest code_necessary to reproduce it in the_question itself. Questions without a clear problem_statement are not useful to other_readers. See: How to create_a Minimal,_Reproducible Example.

This guidance/explanation pretty much_covers that the_shortest code_necessary to reproduce_the problem must appear in the_question itself. If_you like, you can also leave_a_comment explaining that_we_do_not allow_images of code,_and_that the_asker_needs to paste the code into_the_question as text. A comment I sometimes_use for this goes_as_follows:

Please add code and_errors as text (using code_formatting), not images. Images are problematic_for many_reasons, including_that they don't allow copy-pasting text for testing or searching.

So, basically…yes:

In_such a case, should we stand_on principle and ask_the user_to_repost as text?_I_fear that_by doing this, we just drive away_first-time posters.

I_do not believe that this will_drive away first-time posters._They_are invested in getting an answer,_so they'll simply do the little_chore or jump over the_little_hurdle_that we're asking them to_do. Hopefully, next time, they will_have this requirement_in mind and thus avoid making the_same_mistake again. In the meantime, we've_all_done our part to ensure that_the_question_is useful to others in_the future, which is the true_purpose of this site. (Remember that Stack Overflow is_not a help_desk. Our mission is not_so_much_to help the asker, but rather to build up a_library of_high-quality Q&A on_programming topics. Helping the asker is a nice side benefit,_but our model is much more akin_to Wikipedia than some hypothetical HireAProgrammer.com.)