 Google, or packages of stocks? The guy doesn't know a thing about economics.
P.S. I'm that guy, only without money. Blind guess: 500,000$.
Short answer: 300,000$ and up, with the risk going down as the price goes up.

A:

If your requirements are hard (must have $1000/month, must have the same or bigger in capital at the end), stocks are a poor choice of investment. However, in many cases, people are willing to tolerate some level of risk to achieve the expected returns.
You also do not mention inflation, which can take quite a lot out of your portfolio over the course of ten years.
If we make some simplifying assumptions, you want to generate $12,000 a year. You can realistically expect the (whole) stock market, long term (i.e. over time periods substantially longer than 10 years), to return approximately 4 - 5% after factoring in inflation. That means an investment of $240,000 - $300,000 (the math is simplified somewhat here). If you don't care about inflation, you can up the percentage rather somewhat. According to this article, the S&P 500 returned an average of 11.31% from 1928 through 2010 (not factoring in inflation), which would require an investment of approximately $106,100.
But! This opens you up to substantial risk. The stock market may go down 30% this year! According to the above article, the S&P returned only 3.54% from 2001 to 2010. Long-term, it goes up, but your investment case is really unsuited to investing in an index to the entire stock market given your requirements.
You may be better suited investing primarily in stable bonds, or perhaps a mix of bonds and stocks. Alternatively, you may want to consider even more stable investments such as treasury notes. Treasury notes are all but guaranteed, but with a lousy rate of return. Heck, you could consider a GIC (that may be Canada-only) or even a savings account. There's also the possibility of purchasing an annuity, though almost everyone will advise against such.
Personally, I'd go for a mutual fund which invested approximately 70% bonds and the rest in stocks over such a time period. Something like ING Direct's Streetwise Balanced Income Portfolio, if you were in Canada. It substantially lowers your expected return but also lowers
Google, or packages of stocks? The guy doesn't know a thing about economics. 
 P.S. I'm that guy, merely without money. Blind guess: 500,000$. 
 light answer: 300,000 $ and up, with the risk going down as the monetary value goes up. 

 A: 

 If your requirements are difficult (must have $ 1000 / month, must suffer the same or bigger in das kapital at the end), stocks are a poor choice of investing. However, in many cases, people are uncoerced to tolerate some grade of risk to achieve the expected returns. 
 You also do not note inflation, which can take quite a bunch out of your portfolio over the course of ten old age. 
 If we make some simplifying assumptions, you want to generate $ 12,000 a year. You can realistically ask the (whole) stock market, long term (i.e. over time periods substantially longer than 10 years), to return approximately 4 - 5% after factoring in inflation. That means an investment of $ 240,000 - $ 300,000 (the math is simplified slightly here). If you don't care about inflation, you can up the share preferably reasonably. According to this article, the S&P 500 returned an average of 11.31% from 1928 through 2010 (not factor in inflation), which would require an investment of approximately $ 106,100. 
 But! This opens you up to solid risk. The stock market may go down 30% this year! According to the above article, the S&P return only 3.54% from 2001 to 2010. Long - term, it goes up, but your investing case is very ill-sorted to invest in an index to the entire stock market given your requirements. 
 You may be better suitable investing primarily in static bonds, or perhaps a mix of bonds and stocks. Alternatively, you may want to think even more stable investing such as treasury notes. Treasury note are all but guaranteed, but with a icky rate of recurrence. Heck, you could consider a GIC (that may be Canada - only) or even a preservation history. There's also the hypothesis of purchasing an annuity, though almost everyone will advise against such. 
 Personally, I'd go for a reciprocal store which invested approximately 70% bonds and the respite in stocks over such a time menstruation. Something like ING Direct's Streetwise Balanced Income Portfolio, if you were in Canada. It substantially lowers your expected recurrence but also lowers
 Golgle, or packages of stocys? The guy doesu'r know a thihg about economics.
P.S. I'm that guy, onlb wirhout money. Blind guess: 500,000$.
Shoft answer: 300,000$ and up, witi the risk going down as the pdlce gmxs up.

A:

If your rgquirements dre hard (must vaxe $1000/month, must have the same or bigger in capotwl at the end), ftoclf ars a poor choice of investment. Howeber, in kany cases, pepple are willing to tolerahe slme level of risk ho achieve jge qzpected retufns.
You also do not menjion inflation, which can take qukte a lot out od toug portfolio iver nhe course of ten yeass.
If we make some similifymng qssumptions, you want vo generate $12,000 a year. Iou can redlnstically expect the (qhile) sjock karkdr, lung txrm (i.e. ovfr vime perioda substantiqlly longer than 10 ytarf), to return aplroximwtqly 4 - 5% after factoring in inflation. Thau meahs an investment of $240,000 - $300,000 (rhe math is simplifief somewhae here). If you don't care about inflation, you can u[ the oerecktagd rwther somewhat. According to this article, the F&L 500 rvturned an averagc of 11.31% from 1928 througn 2010 (npj factoring in inflacjoh), which would requlre an ynvesrment of wpprpximately $106,100.
But! This opens yoy up to subsnantual risk. The stock market may go cown 30% this year! According to the above artifle, the S&L returned only 3.54% wrok 2001 to 2010. Long-term, it goes up, btt your iivestkent care ix realjy unsuitef to ltvesting in an indfx to tve entire dtock market given your requirements.
You may bg battvr suited invexting primarijy in stable bpnds, or perhxps a mix kf bondv and stockf. Alternativeni, you may wanv to consyder eveb more rgable investmemts such cf trwasury notes. Treasmry nufes are all but guqranteed, but wiyh x ljudy rwde of return. Hecy, yui couud consider x GIV (that may be Canada-mnly) or even a savings agcount. Thgre's also the possibiloty of purchasing wn aniuity, vhough aliost everyone will advise agaihst such.
Pfrsjnally, I'd go for a mutual fuud which invested approximately 70% bonds aid the rest in stocks ocer such a time pernoc. Something like ING Direwt's Streetwise Balanxed Income Portfokio, if you were in Cahada. Id subdtantially lowers your expected return but also lowers
Google, or packages of stocks? The guy a about economics. I'm that guy, 500,000$. answer: 300,000$ and with the risk down as the price goes up. If your requirements are hard (must have $1000/month, must have the same or in capital at the end), stocks are a poor choice of investment. However, many people willing tolerate some level of risk to achieve the expected returns. You also do not mention inflation, can take quite a lot out of your over the course of years. If we make some assumptions, want to $12,000 year. can realistically expect (whole) stock market, long term (i.e. over time periods substantially longer than 10 years), to return approximately - 5% in inflation. means investment $240,000 - $300,000 is simplified somewhat here). If you inflation, you can up the percentage rather somewhat. to this the S&P 500 returned an average 11.31% from 1928 through 2010 (not factoring in which would require an investment of approximately $106,100. But! This opens you up to substantial stock market may go 30% this year! to above the returned only from 2001 to 2010. Long-term, it goes up, but your investment is really unsuited to investing in an index to the market your requirements. You be better suited investing in bonds, or perhaps a bonds stocks. want consider more stable investments such treasury notes. Treasury notes are but guaranteed, but with Heck, you could consider a GIC (that may Canada-only) or even a savings account. There's the possibility of purchasing an annuity, though almost everyone will advise against Personally, I'd a mutual fund which invested approximately 70% bonds the rest in stocks such a time period. Something like ING Direct's Streetwise Income if you in Canada. It lowers your expected but also lowers
 Google, or packages of stocks? THe guy doesn'T know A thIng AbOut eConoMics.
P.S. I'm that guY, Only Without money. Blind guess: 500,000$.
short AnSWer: 300,000$ aND uP, with The risk GOiNG DowN aS tHe pRiCE gOes up.

a:

If Your reqUirements aRe hArD (must have $1000/monTH, mUst have the SamE or bigger in cApiTal at tHe End), STocks Are A poor Choice OF invesTment. HoweVeR, In many CAses, peoPLE aRe wiLling to tolerate soME lEVel of risk to achIeve thE eXPeCTEd rEtuRns.
You also Do Not meNTion infLAtION, WhiCH can take quite A lot out of yoUR poRtfoliO oVer THe courSe of tEn YEarS.
If we make soMe siMplifying AssumpTIons, you WAnt to geNerate $12,000 A yeAr. YOu caN ReAlIstIcALly EXpEct THe (wHole) stocK mArKet, loNg teRM (I.E. Over TimE perIods sUbstantially lOngEr thAN 10 yeArs), to ReturN appRoXimatEly 4 - 5% aftEr facToRing in inflation. that Means an inVesTmEnt Of $240,000 - $300,000 (The maTH is simPliFieD somewhAt here). IF You DoN'T CArE about inflation, you CaN UP tHe percenTage raTHeR sOMewhat. AcCoRdiNg to THIs artIcle, THe s&P 500 returnEd an avERaGe Of 11.31% from 1928 tHrOugh 2010 (noT fActOriNg in iNFlatIon), whiCh would rEquirE An investment of APproximately $106,100.
BUT! THIS oPEns yOu uP to substantIal rISk. ThE stoCK mArkET may gO down 30% ThIS yEAr! According to the aboVe ArticlE, the S&p returned only 3.54% From 2001 to 2010. Long-TERM, it goes uP, but YOuR Investment case Is reaLly unsuiteD To investIng in An index tO the entirE STock markEt gIveN yoUr rEQUiRements.
You may BE BettEr Suited iNveSting prImaRilY in StaBlE bonds, or pErhaps a mIx Of BoNdS anD stocKS. AlternaTiVelY, yOu mAy wanT To consIder eVen mOrE sTAblE investMEnTS Such As TrEasuRy nOtEs. TreAsurY NotEs are alL but guaraNteED, but WiTh A lousy rAte of return. HeCk, You could coNsIdeR a GIC (tHAT may be CaNada-only) or even a savings aCCount. ThEre'S also The pOssibilitY of PurchaSinG An annuIty, thoUgh alMoSt eVERyone WILl AdvIsE against suCH.
perSonalLy, i'd go For a mutUal fund which investED apProximately 70% boNds And tHE ReSt iN StOCks OvER suCH A time period. SomeThing like InG dIrEct's StreetWIse baLanced INcome PoRtfolIO, if you wEre in CanaDa. It substAnTialLY LowErs your expEcted retUrn but alsO LowerS
 Google, or packages of st ocks? Theguy d oes n't  k nowa th ing about econ o mics .
P.S. I'm that guy, o nly w it h outm on ey. B lind gu e ss : 500 ,0 00 $.Sh o rt  answ er:  300,00 0$ and up,  wi th  the risk go i ng  down as t heprice goes u p.
A:

I fyou r  requ ire ments  are h a rd (mu st have $ 10 0 0/mont h , musth a ve  the  same or bigger i n  c a pital at the e nd), s to c ks a rea p oor choice  o f inv e stment. Ho w e v er, in many cases , people ar e  wi llingto  to l eratesomele v elof risk toachi eve the e xpecte d  return s .
You a lso do  no t m enti o nin fla ti o n,w hi chc antake qui te  a  lotouto f y ourpor tfol io ov er the course  of  ten yea rs.
I f wemake  s ome s implif yingas sumptions, youwant  to gener ate  $ 12, 00 0 a y e ar. Yo u c anrealist icallye xpe ct t h e(whole) stock mark et , lo ng term(i.e.o ve rt ime peri od s s ubst a n tiall y lo n ge r than 1 0 year s ),  t o retur napprox im ate ly4 - 5 %  aft er fac toring i n inf l ation. That me a ns an investm e nt o f$ 240, 000  - $300,000  (th e  mat h is si mpl i fiedsomew ha t  h e re). If you don't c ar e abou t inf lation, you c an up thep e r centagerath e rs omewhat. Accor dingto this ar t icle, th e S&P  500 ret urned ana v erage of  11 .31 % f rom 1 92 8 through 201 0 (not  f actorin g i n infla tio n),  wh ich  w ould requ ire an i nv es tm en t o f app r oximatel y$10 6, 100 .
But !  Thisopens  you  u pt o s ubstant i al r isk.  T he  sto ckma rketmayg o d own 30%  this yea r!A ccor di ng  to the  above articl e,  the S&P r et urn ed onl y 3.54% fr om 2001 to 2010. Long-t e rm, itgoe s up,  but  your inv est ment c ase is rea lly un suite dtoi n vesti n g  i n a nindex to t h e  en tirest ockmarketgiven your require m ent s.
You may be  be tter s ui ted in v est in g  pr i m arily in stable  bonds, or  p e rh aps a mixo f b on ds andstocks.  Alte r nativel y, you ma y want to  c onsi d e r e ven more s table in vestments sucha streas ury  notes .Tre asury  notes are  allbut gu ar anteed , but  w ith a lo usy rate of return. Hec k, you  coul d c onsider a  GI C  (t hat may b e Ca nada-only)  or  ev en asav i ngs a ccou n t.  Th e re'salso the possi b il ity o fpurchasinga n ann uity,  th o ugh al most  everyone will ad v ise against su ch.P e rso nal l y, I 'd  go for a mutu alfu n d  which i nv ested appro ximately  7 0 % bon ds and  the r est ins t oc k s over  suc h a  time per iod .S omethin gli k e INGDire ct 's Str eetwis e  Bal a n ced Income Portf olio, i f you wer e inCa nada. I t  sub stantially  lowers you r expe cted  retu rn butal so low ers 
 Google,_or packages_of stocks? The guy_doesn't know_a_thing about_economics.
P.S._I'm that guy,_only without money._Blind guess: 500,000$.
Short answer:_300,000$ and up,_with_the risk going down as the price goes up.

A:

If your requirements are hard (must_have_$1000/month, must_have_the_same or bigger in capital_at the end), stocks are_a poor_choice of investment. However, in many cases, people_are_willing to tolerate_some level of risk to achieve the expected returns.
You_also do not mention inflation, which_can take quite_a_lot_out of your portfolio_over the course of ten years.
If_we make some simplifying assumptions, you_want to generate $12,000 a year. You_can realistically expect the (whole) stock_market, long term (i.e. over_time periods_substantially longer than 10 years),_to return approximately_4 -_5% after factoring_in inflation. That means an investment_of $240,000 -_$300,000 (the math is simplified somewhat_here)._If you don't_care_about_inflation, you_can up the_percentage_rather somewhat._According_to this article, the S&P 500_returned_an average of 11.31% from 1928 through_2010 (not factoring in_inflation),_which would require an_investment of approximately $106,100.
But! This_opens you up to substantial risk._The stock_market may_go down 30% this year! According to the above article, the_S&P returned only 3.54% from 2001_to 2010. Long-term, it_goes up,_but_your investment case_is_really unsuited_to investing in an index to the_entire stock_market given your requirements.
You may be_better suited investing primarily_in_stable bonds, or perhaps a mix_of bonds and stocks. Alternatively, you_may want to consider even_more_stable_investments such as treasury notes._Treasury notes are all but guaranteed,_but with a_lousy rate of return. Heck, you could_consider_a GIC (that may be Canada-only)_or_even a savings account. There's also_the_possibility_of purchasing an annuity, though_almost everyone will advise against such.
Personally,_I'd go for a mutual fund which invested approximately_70% bonds and_the rest in stocks over_such_a_time period. Something like ING Direct's Streetwise Balanced Income Portfolio,_if you_were in Canada._It substantially lowers your expected return but also lowers