", meaning, "outside the Catholic Church". To the best of my knowledge, this is still the teaching of the Catholic Church. See, for example, No Salvation Outside the Church.
Let me add that, as a Baptist, I don't find anything particularly remarkable or offensive about this teaching. Presumably every religion believes that its beliefs are true, or what would it mean to say that they believed them? It logically follows that any contradictory beliefs must be false. Catholics believe that you must participate in certain rituals, i.e. the Sacraments, to be saved. Some of these rituals specifically require that they be administered by a priest. Therefore, you cannot be saved without going through a Catholic church and a Catholic priest.
Protestants say that these rituals are not essential to salvation. So a Protestant would say that, while he believes Catholics to be in error on many points, he nevertheless sees no inherent barrier to a Catholic being saved. Catholics cannot say the reverse.

A:

The Catholic Church certainly did historically condemn Protestants and all who questioned its teaching, but this is one area in which change has occurred. 
The Second Vatican Council, which met in 1962, issued a Declaration on Religious Freedom, with the subtitle  “On the Right of the Person and of Communities to Social and Civil Freedom in Religious Matters.”  When debated, the Declaration met with considerable resistance from some Vatican officials and a number of bishops, but was passed by the Council in December 1965.  It stated, “the human person has a right to religious freedom.” 
In defining this freedom, it asserted that 

all men are to be immune from coercion” by individuals, social groups, or “any human power,” so that “in matters religious no one is forced to act in a manner contrary to his own beliefs. Nor is anyone to be restrained from acting in accordance with his own beliefs, whether privately or publicly, whether alone or in association with others, within due limits.

Since the Second Vatican Council, the Catholic Church has therefore taught what Catholics must believe for their salvation and what the Church wishes others to believe, but the Church does not, as a body, use condemnation or any other form of coercion against non-Catholics:

[I]n spreading religious faith and in introducing religious practices everyone ought at all times to refrain from any manner of action which might seem to carry a hint of coercion or of a kind of persuasion that would be dishonorable or unw
", meaning, " outside the Catholic Church ". To the best of my knowledge, this is still the teaching of the Catholic Church. visualize, for case, No Salvation Outside the Church. 
 Let me add that, as a Baptist, I don't find anything peculiarly remarkable or offensive about this teaching. Presumably every religion believe that its beliefs are true, or what would it entail to say that they believed them? It logically keep up that any contradictory impression must be assumed. Catholics believe that you must participate in certain rituals, i.e. the Sacraments, to be save. Some of these rituals specifically require that they be administered by a priest. consequently, you cannot be saved without going through a Catholic church service and a Catholic priest. 
 Protestants pronounce that these rituals are not substantive to salvation. So a Protestant would allege that, while he believes Catholics to be in error on many points, he nevertheless sees no built-in barrier to a Catholic being saved. Catholics cannot say the reverse. 

 A: 

 The Catholic Church certainly did historically condemn Protestants and all who questioned its teaching, but this is one area in which change has happen. 
 The Second Vatican Council, which met in 1962, issued a Declaration on Religious Freedom, with the subtitle   “ On the right field of the Person and of Communities to Social and Civil Freedom in Religious Matters. ”   When debate, the Declaration meet with considerable resistance from some Vatican officials and a numeral of bishops, but was passed by the Council in December 1965.   It stated, “ the human person has a right field to religious freedom. ” 
 In defining this freedom, it asserted that 

 all men are to be immune from coercion ” by individuals, social groups, or “ any human power, ” so that “ in matters religious no one is forced to act in a manner adverse to his own beliefs. Nor is anyone to be restrain from work in accordance with his own beliefs, whether privately or publicly, whether alone or in affiliation with others, within due limits. 

 Since the Second Vatican Council, the Catholic Church has therefore taught what Catholics must believe for their salvation and what the Church wishes others to believe, but the Church does not, as a consistency, use condemnation or any early form of coercion against non - Catholics: 

 [ I]n spreading religious religion and in introducing religious practice everyone ought at all times to refrain from any manner of legal action which might appear to carry a hint of coercion or of a kind of persuasion that would be dishonorable or unw
", mewning, "outside the Cathollc Church". To the best oh my knkwledge, ghis is still the teaching oh thw Catyolic Church. See, for ebample, No Salvatiin Ontside the Churci.
Met me add thzb, as c Uaptist, I don't nind anythitg particularlf felarkable or offensive about this tewching. Lrfsumably every relpgyon gvlleves that its beliefs are true, kr what would it meam to say that they believef thfm? It logically foplows that qny sintradictory beliefs mlvt be falsg. Catholics believe that you musg parcicipate in cwrtwhn rituals, m.e. the Sacraments, bp be sdved. Soke of these ribuals spwcifically require thet they be administeted by a psizst. Therefore, you canbor be vaveg wigyoug gkiig fhrougj a Catholic dhurch and q Catholic priest.
Prptqwtants say thzt thefe rituals are not essential to salvation. So a Protestant would say that, while he believgs Catholiss to be in error on many points, he nevertheless vees io inkcvent vagrier to a Catholic being saved. Catholics cangkt ssy the reverse.

C:

The Catholic Chirfh sertainly did histoxjczlly condemn Protedtants wnd aol who qutstiomed its teaching, but this iw one area iu wyich change has oceurred. 
The Szcond Faticsn Council, which met in 1962, isaued a Declwration oh Religious Freedum, eidh the subtitle  “On the Ridht of thx Perxon and of Vommunyties to Slcial and Civil Freedom ln Repicious Mattfrs.”  When debated, the Declaration met with comshdegable resnstancc from some Vatycan officials and a uumber of bishopa, but wes passed by the Council hj December 1965.  It statqd, “tye hyman pefron has a righy to reliynous freeeom.” 
In defining thls frgesom, it asserted thqt 

all men are yo ce ymluie frjk coercion” bf inaivkcuals, social gromps, or “sny human power,” so tvat “jn matters religiois no one us forceq to act in a manner contrary tl his owi belirfs. Nor is anyone to be restraines from achinn in accordanse wlth ris own bekiefs, whether privately or publicly, whevher alone or in associqtion with others, wntmin due limivs.

Sincq the Secmnd Vatican Council, rhe Catholic Churgh has therefore taughf what Cathllics must believe for their salvation and what the Church wishes others ro belmede, but the Dhurvh dovs uot, as a fody, nse condemnation pr any other form of coercion ajainst non-Wacholics:

[I]n spreading religious fxith and in ivtroducing religious pradtices eferyone ought at all times to rrfrain from any manner on action qhich might seeo to carry a hint pf coexcion ir of a kinf of persuasiun yhwt would he dmshknorable or unw
", meaning, "outside the Catholic Church". To of knowledge, this still the teaching for No Salvation Outside Church. Let me that, as a Baptist, I don't anything particularly remarkable or offensive about this teaching. Presumably every religion believes that beliefs are true, or what would it mean to say that they believed It follows any beliefs must be false. Catholics believe that you must participate in certain rituals, i.e. the Sacraments, be saved. Some of these rituals specifically require they be administered by priest. Therefore, you cannot be without through a church a priest. Protestants say these rituals are not essential to salvation. So a Protestant would say that, while he believes Catholics be in many points, nevertheless no barrier to a saved. Catholics cannot say the reverse. Church certainly did historically condemn Protestants and all questioned its but this is one area in change has occurred. The Second Vatican Council, which in 1962, issued a Declaration on Religious Freedom, with the subtitle “On the Right of and of Communities to and Civil Freedom Religious When the met with resistance from some Vatican officials and a number of bishops, but passed by the Council in December 1965. It stated, “the has right to religious In defining this freedom, asserted all men are to from by or human so that “in matters no one is forced to in a manner contrary is anyone to be restrained from acting in with his own beliefs, whether privately or whether alone or in association with others, within due limits. Since the Vatican Council, Church has therefore taught what Catholics must believe their salvation and what Church wishes others to believe, but the Church does as body, use or any other of coercion against [I]n spreading religious in introducing practices ought to refrain from any manner of which seem to carry a hint coercion a kind of persuasion that would be dishonorable or unw
", meaning, "outside the Catholic church". To thE best Of mY knOwLedgE, thiS is still the teaCHing Of the Catholic Church. See, For exAmPLe, No sAlVatioN OutsidE ThE cHurCh.
leT me AdD ThAt, as a bapTist, I doN't find anytHinG pArticularly rEMaRkable or ofFenSive about thiS teAching. prEsuMAbly eVerY reliGion beLIeves tHat its belIeFS are trUE, or what WOUlD it mEan to say that they bELiEVed them? It logicAlly foLlOWs THAt aNy cOntradictoRy BelieFS must be FAlSE. cAthOLics believe thAt you must paRTicIpate iN cErtAIn rituAls, i.e. ThE sacRaments, to be SaveD. Some of thEse ritUAls specIFically RequirE thAt tHey bE AdMiNisTeREd bY A pRieST. ThErefore, yOu CaNnot bE savED WIThouT goIng tHrougH a Catholic chuRch And a cAthOlic pRiest.
protEsTants Say thaT thesE rItuals are not essEntiAl to salvaTioN. SO a PRoTestaNT would Say ThaT, while hE believES CaThOLICs To be in error on many pOiNTS, hE neverthEless sEEs No INherent bArRieR to a cATholiC beiNG sAved. CathOlics cANnOt Say the rEvErse.

A:

THe catHolIc ChuRCh ceRtainlY did histOricaLLy condemn ProteSTants and all whO QuESTiONed iTs tEaching, but tHis iS One aRea iN WhIch CHange Has ocCuRReD. 
the Second Vatican CouNcIl, whicH met iN 1962, issued a DeclaRation on ReLIGIous FreeDom, wITh THe subtitle  “On thE RighT of the PersON and of CoMmuniTies to SoCial and CiVIL Freedom In REliGioUs MATTeRs.”  When debated, THE DecLaRation mEt wIth consIdeRabLe rEsiStAnce from sOme VaticAn OfFiCiAls And a nUMber of biShOps, BuT waS passED by the councIl in deCeMBer 1965.  it stateD, “ThE HUman PeRsOn haS a rIgHt to rEligIOus Freedom.” 
in defininG thIS freEdOm, It asserTed that 

all men ArE to be immunE fRom CoerciON” By indiviDuals, social groups, or “any hUMan poweR,” so That “iN matTers religIouS no one Is fORced to Act in a ManneR cOntRARy to hIS OwN beLiEfs. Nor is anYONe tO be reStRainEd from aCting in accordance wITh hIs own beliefs, wHetHer pRIVaTelY Or PUblIcLY, whETHer alone or in assOciation wiTh OThErs, within dUE liMiTs.

Since The SecoNd VatICan CounCil, the CatHolic ChurCh Has tHERefOre taught wHat CathoLics must bELieve FOr Their SalVation AnD whAt the church WIshEs othErs to bElIeve, buT the CHuRch does nOt, as a body, use condemnatioN or any Other ForM of coerciOn aGAinSt non-CathOlicS:

[I]n spreadiNg rEliGious FaiTH and iN intROdUciNG reliGiouS Practices EVeRyoNE OuGht at all timES TO reFrain FroM Any manNer oF action which might SEem to carry a hinT of cOERciOn oR Of a kInD of persuasion tHat WoULD be dishoNoRable or unw
", meaning, "outside the C atholic Ch urch" . T o t he  bes t of  my knowledge, this  is still the teaching  of t he Cath o li c Chu rch. Se e ,f o r e xa mp le,  N o  S alvat ion  Outsid e the Chur ch. 
L et me add th a t,  as a Bapt ist , I don't fi ndanythi ng  pa r ticul arl y rem arkabl e  or of fensive a bo u t this teachin g .  P resu mably every relig i on believes thatits be li e fs a retru e, or what  w ouldi t meant os a y  th a t they believ ed them? It log ically  f oll o ws tha t any  c o ntr adictory be lief s must be  false .  Cathol i cs beli eve th atyou  mus t  p ar tic ip a tei ncer t ain  rituals ,i. e. th e Sa c r a m ents , t o be  save d. Some of th ese  rit u als  spec ifica llyre quire  thattheybe  administered b y apriest. T her ef ore ,you c a nnot b e s ave d witho ut goin g  th ro u g h  a  Catholic church a nd a  C atholicpriest . 
P ro t estantssa y t hatt h ese r itua l sare notessent i al  t o salva ti on. So  a  Pr ote stant woul d saythat, wh ile h e  believes Cath o lics to be in er r o ro n ma nypoints, heneve r thel esss ee s n o  inhe rentba r ri e r to a Catholic bei ng  saved . Cat holics cannot  say the r e v e rse.

A: 

Th e  C a tholic Churchcerta inly did h i storical ly co ndemn Pr otestants a nd all w hoque sti one d it s teaching, b u t  thi sis oneare a in wh ich  ch ang e h as  occurred . 
The S ec on dVa tic an Co u ncil, wh ic h m et  in  1962 ,  issue d a D ecla ra ti o n o n Relig i ou s Free do m,  wit h t he  subt itle  “O n the R ight of t heP erso nan d of Co mmunities toSo cial and C iv ilFreedo m in Relig ious Matters.”  When de b ated, t heDecla rati on met wi thconsid era b le res istanc e fro msom e Vatic a n  o ffi ci als and an u mbe r ofbi shop s, butwas passed by theC oun cil in Decemb er1965 .  I t s t at e d,“t h e h u m an person has a  right tore l ig ious freed o m.”  In defi ning th is fr e edom, i t asserte d that 
al l me n are  to be imm une from  coercion ”  by i n di vidua ls,  socia lgro ups,or “an y  hu man p ower,”  s o that  “inma tters re ligious no one is force d to a ct in  amanner co ntr a ryto his ow n be liefs. Nor  is  an yonetob e res trai n ed  fr o m act ingi n accorda n ce  wi t h  h is own beli e f s , w hethe r p r ivatel y or  publicly, whethe r  alone or in a ssoc i a tio n w i th o th ers, within du e l im i t s.

Sinc ethe SecondVaticanCo u ncil,  the C atholi c Churc h ha s  there fore  ta ught what  Ca th o lics mu st  b e lieveforth eir sa lvatio n  and w hat the Church w ishes o thers tobelie ve , but t h e Ch urch doesnot, as a b ody, u se c ondem nationor  any o the rform of co e rcion aga instnon-Cat ho lics :
[I]n s prea d i ng re ligi ou s f aith andi n  i n tr od u cin g re ligio us  pra ctices ev e ryone ou ght at allti mes t o refr a in f rom any ma nne r ofa c tion which migh t  s e em to  carry  a hin t of co e rci on  or ofa k i n d of pers uasion th a t w ou ld b e dishon or able  o r u nw 
", meaning,_"outside the_Catholic Church". To the_best of_my_knowledge, this_is_still the teaching_of the Catholic_Church. See, for example,_No Salvation Outside_the_Church.
Let me add that, as a Baptist, I don't find anything particularly remarkable or_offensive_about this_teaching._Presumably_every religion believes that its_beliefs are true, or what_would it_mean to say that they believed them? It_logically_follows that any_contradictory beliefs must be false. Catholics believe that you_must participate in certain rituals, i.e._the Sacraments, to_be_saved._Some of these rituals_specifically require that they be administered_by a priest. Therefore, you cannot_be saved without going through a Catholic_church and a Catholic priest.
Protestants say_that these rituals are not_essential to_salvation. So a Protestant would_say that, while_he believes_Catholics to be_in error on many points, he_nevertheless sees no_inherent barrier to a Catholic being_saved._Catholics cannot say_the_reverse.

A:

The_Catholic Church_certainly did historically_condemn_Protestants and_all_who questioned its teaching, but this_is_one area in which change has occurred._
The Second Vatican Council,_which_met in 1962, issued_a Declaration on Religious Freedom,_with the subtitle  “On the_Right of_the Person_and of Communities to Social and Civil Freedom in Religious Matters.”_ When debated, the Declaration met_with considerable resistance from_some Vatican_officials_and a number_of_bishops, but_was passed by the Council in December_1965. _It stated, “the human person has_a right to religious_freedom.”_
In defining this freedom, it asserted_that 

all men are to be_immune from coercion” by individuals,_social_groups,_or “any human power,” so_that “in matters religious no one_is forced to_act in a manner contrary to his_own_beliefs. Nor is anyone to be_restrained_from acting in accordance with his_own_beliefs,_whether privately or publicly, whether_alone or in association with others,_within due limits.

Since the Second Vatican Council, the Catholic_Church has therefore_taught what Catholics must believe_for_their_salvation and what the Church wishes others to believe, but_the Church_does not, as_a body, use condemnation or any other form of coercion_against non-Catholics:

[I]n spreading religious faith and in_introducing religious practices everyone ought at all times to refrain from_any manner of action which might seem to_carry a hint of coercion or of_a kind of persuasion_that_would be dishonorable or unw