 still less than enchanted with the NGS settlement  after SoCalGas
tailored it to their interests but am glad that the Commission is at least
considering opening up the system ala PG&E.   I think that they are
reasonably aware that SoCalGas was not blameless in the runup in gas prices
that took place last December.   Having said that we are having a hell of a
time in the GCIM simply trying to investigate what really happened.
SoCalGas latest excuse for not giving us info is that we will "competitors"
with them (as a result of the filed rate litigation) for gas hedges.  I
must have misunderstood; I did not realize there was a limited supply of
hedges available and that there was competition for those "available"
hedges.   Anytime Enron wants to help on these GCIM issues, we would
welcome it--might make you look less like a Texas robber baron.

Douglas Porter, Senior Attorney
Southern California Edison Company
(626)302-3964
(626)302-3990(fax)
douglas.porter@sce.com


                                                                                             
                    "Dasovich,                                                               
                    Jeff"                  To:     <porterdk@sce.com>                        
                    <Jeff.Dasovich@        cc:                                               
                    enron.com>             Subject:                                          
                                                                                             
                    10/12/01 03:18                                                           
                    PM                                                                       
                                                                                             
                                                                                             




Hi Doug:
Hope all is well.  Congratulations to you folks on your agreement with
the PUC.  Must be a relief.

 I was writing to get your reaction to the judge's proposed order in the
El Paso case.  You think the Commission is likely to adopt it?  Change
it?  Judge's proposal fatally flawed on the market power issue?
Appreciate your insights.

AND did you hear Bilas issued the our gas settlement as his proposed
decision for adoption by the Commission at its 10.25.01 meeting!?!?!
What next?

Best,
Jeff


**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended
still less than enchanted with the NGS settlement   after SoCalGas 
 tailored it to their interest but am beaming that the Commission is at least 
 considering opening up the arrangement ala PG&E.    I intend that they are 
 reasonably aware that SoCalGas was not blameless in the runup in natural gas price 
 that took topographic point last December.    Having said that we are suffer a hell of a 
 fourth dimension in the GCIM plainly trying to investigate what really happened. 
 SoCalGas latest excuse for not contribute us info is that we will " competitors " 
 with them (as a result of the charge rate litigation) for gas hedges.   I 
 must have misunderstood; I did not recognize there was a limited supply of 
 hedges available and that there was contest for those " available " 
 hedges.    Anytime Enron wants to help on these GCIM issues, we would 
 welcome it -- might make you look less like a Texas robber baron. 

 Douglas Porter, Senior Attorney 
 Southern California Edison Company 
 (626)302 - 3964 
 (626)302 - 3990(fax) 
 douglas.porter@sce.com 


                                                                                             
                     " Dasovich,                                                               
                     Jeff "                   To:      < porterdk@sce.com >                        
                     < Jeff. Dasovich@         cc:                                               
                     enron.com >              Subject:                                          
                                                                                             
                     10/12/01 03:18                                                           
                     PM                                                                       
                                                                                             
                                                                                             




 Hi Doug: 
 Hope all is well.   Congratulations to you folks on your agreement with 
 the PUC.   Must be a relief. 

  I was writing to get your reaction to the judge's proposed order in the 
 El Paso event.   You think the Commission is likely to espouse it?   transfer 
 it?   Judge's proposal fatally flawed on the market office topic? 
 Appreciate your insights. 

 AND did you learn Bilas issued the our gas settlement as his proposed 
 decision for adoption by the Commission at its 10.25.01 meeting! ?! ?! 
 What next? 

 Best, 
 Jeff 


 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 
 This e - mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate 
 and may control confidential and privileged fabric for the exclusive use of 
 the intended
 stlll less than enchanted dith the NGS sejtoement  afted SoCalGxs
tailored it to their interxsts but qm glad that the Commirsion is wt least
xonsmdering opening nl the snftem wla 'G&X.   I think thaj they are
redsonably aware tfac SoCalGas was not blameless in the wunup im has prices
that tool pladv oast December.   Having said tgat we ere having a hekl of a
time in the GCIM silply trying to investihate what rgzllr happened.
SoCxlGas latest excuse fot not giving us info is that we dill "eompetitors"
qirh hvem (as a rewult jf the filed rate lidigatiom) for gas hedgcs.  I
kusr have misunderstood; M did not realize thgre was a nijited supply of
heegws avdilatle xbd ghau tiers was fom'etition fod those "avaulable"
hedges.   Anytomq Enron wants fo hel[ jn these GCIM issues, we would
welcome it--kiggt make you look less luke a Texas robber baton.

Douglas Porter, Senior Attorney
Southern California Edison Compenh
(626)302-3964
(626)302-3990(far)
eouglxw.plrter@sce.com


                                                                                             
                    "Dasjvich,                                                               
                    Jefg"                  To:     <poxterdk@ace.com>                        
                    <Jeff.Dasovich@        cc:                                               
                    anron.com>             Subject:                                          
                                                                                             
                    10/12/01 03:18                                                           
                    KM                                                                       
                                                                                             
                                                                                             




Hi Doug:
Hope all is well.  Coigratulations to you fooks on your agreemeut with
the PUR.  Muse be a renief.

 I was writing ti get your reactipn to the judge's propksed osder ln the
El Paso case.  You think the Commission is likely to adopt it?  Changw
it?  Jndde's proposam fayally fjcwed on the oarket power issle?
Appreciate your insights.

AND div you hear Bnlas issued the our gas settlrmdnt as his pruposed
decision for adoptjon by tne Commission at its 10.25.01 meeting!?!?!
Whst next?

Best,
Jeff


**********************************************************************
This e-maik is the propsrty of Encon Corp. and/or its rrlevanc affioiate
ane man contain confkdemtlal and prlviltged material for the sole use of
the inteneef
still less than enchanted with the NGS SoCalGas it to interests but am at considering opening up system ala PG&E. think that they are reasonably aware SoCalGas was not blameless in the runup in gas prices that took place December. Having said that we are having a hell of a time in GCIM trying investigate really happened. SoCalGas latest excuse for not giving us info is that we will "competitors" with (as a result of the filed rate litigation) gas hedges. I must misunderstood; I did not realize was limited supply hedges and there was competition those "available" hedges. Anytime Enron wants to help on these GCIM issues, we would welcome it--might make look less Texas robber Douglas Senior Southern California Edison (626)302-3990(fax) douglas.porter@sce.com "Dasovich, Jeff" To: <porterdk@sce.com> Subject: 10/12/01 03:18 PM Hi Doug: Hope all well. Congratulations you folks on your agreement with PUC. Must be a relief. I was writing get your reaction to the judge's proposed order in the El Paso case. You think is likely to adopt Change it? Judge's fatally on market issue? Appreciate insights. AND did you hear Bilas issued the our gas settlement his proposed decision for adoption by the Commission at its What Best, Jeff ********************************************************************** e-mail is the property Enron and/or its relevant affiliate contain and the use the intended
 still less than enchanted witH the NGS setTlemeNt  aFteR SOCalgas
tAilored it to theIR intErests but am glad that the commiSsIOn is AT lEast
cOnsiderINg OPEniNg Up The SySTeM ala Pg&E.   I Think thAt they are
rEasOnAbly aware thaT socalGas was nOt bLameless in thE ruNup in gAs PriCEs
thaT toOk plaCe last dEcembeR.   Having saId THat we aRE having A HElL of a
Time in the GCIM simpLY tRYing to investigAte whaT rEAlLY HapPenEd.
SoCalGas LaTest eXCuse for NOt GIVIng US info is that we Will "competiTOrs"
With thEm (As a REsult oF the fIlED raTe litigatioN) for Gas hedges.  i
must hAVe misunDErstood; i did noT reAliZe thERe WaS a lImITed SUpPly OF
heDges avaiLaBlE and tHat tHERE Was cOmpEtitIon foR those "availabLe"
hEdgeS.   anyTime ENron wAnts To Help oN these gCIM iSsUes, we would
welcoMe it--Might make You LoOk lEsS like A texas rObbEr bAron.

DouGlas PorTEr, SEnIOR atTorney
Southern CaliFoRNIa edison CoMpany
(626)302-3964
(626)302-3990(fAX)
dOuGLas.porteR@sCe.cOm


                                                                                             
                    "DaSOVich,                                                               
                    JEff"                  TO:     <PoRterdk@scE.com>                        
                    <JeFF.DAsOvich@        cc:                                               
                    EnRon.com>             suBjeCt:                                          
                                                                                             
                    10/12/01 03:18                                                           
                    Pm                                                                       
                                                                                             
                                                                                             




Hi DoUG:
HopE all is Well.  CongRatulATions to you folkS On your agreemeNT wITH
tHE PUC.  musT be a relief.

 I Was wRItinG to gET yOur REactiOn to tHe JUdGE's proposed order in thE
EL Paso cAse.  YoU think the CommIssion is liKELY to adopt It?  ChANgE
It?  Judge's proposAl fatAlly flawed ON the markEt powEr issue?
APpreciate YOUr insighTs.

AnD dId yOu hEAR BIlas issued the OUR gas SeTtlemenT as His propOseD
deCisIon FoR adoption By the ComMiSsIoN aT itS 10.25.01 meetINg!?!?!
What neXt?

besT,
JEff


**********************************************************************
this e-MAil is tHe proPertY oF ENRon corp. and/OR iTS ReleVaNt AffiLiaTe
And maY conTAin ConfideNtial and pRivILegeD mAtErial foR the sole use of
ThE intended
 still less than enchanted  with theNGS s ett lem en t  a fter  SoCalGas
tail o redit to their interestsbut a mg ladt ha t the  Commis s io n isat  l eas tc on sider ing  openin g up the s yst em  ala PG&E. Ithink that  th ey are
reaso nab ly awa re  th a t SoC alG as wa s notb lamele ss in the  r u nup in gas pri c e sthat  took place lastD ec e mber.   Having  saidth a tw e  ar e h aving a he ll  of a time in th e G CIM simply trying  to investi g ate  whatre all y  happe ned.So C alG as latest e xcus e for not  givin g  us inf o  is tha t we w ill  "c ompe t it or s"wi t h t h em  (a s  aresult o fth e fil ed r a t e liti gat ion)  forgas hedges. I
m usth ave  misu nders tood ;I did  not r ealiz ethere was a lim ited  supply o f
h ed ges  a vaila b le and  th atthere w as comp e tit io n f or  those "available" 
h e d ge s.   Any time E n ro nw ants tohe lpon t h e se GC IM i s su es, we w ould
w e lc om e it--m ig ht mak eyou  lo ok le s s li ke a T exas rob ber b a ron.

DouglasP orter, Senior At t o rn e y
So uth ern Califor niaE diso n Co m pa ny( 626)3 02-39 64 (6 2 6)302-3990(fax)
dou gl as.por ter@s ce.com


                                                                                          " D a so vich,                                                              Jeff"             To:    < port er dk @ sce .com>             
               <Jeff.Da sov i ch@     cc:                                     
                    en r on.com>           Subject:                                                                                                                  10/12/ 01 03:18                                             
              PM                                                                                                                                     
                                                                


Hi Do ug:Hope all is well.  Congratulatio ns t o you  fo l ks o nyour agreement  wi th t he PUC. M ust be a re lief.

Iw as wr itingto get  your r e a ct i on tothejud ge's prop ose do rder in  t he El Pas o ca se .  You  think theC o mmission is like ly to a dopti t? Chan ge 
it?  J u dge' s proposal  fatally fl awed o n th e mar ket pow er  issue ?
A pp reciate yo u r insight s.

A ND didyo u he arBilasissu e d  theourga s s ettlement a sh is  p r opo seddecis io n fo r adoptio n  by theCom m issionat  it s 10.25. 0 1m e eting!?!?! 
Wh at ne x t ?

Best,
J e ff
** * ***** ****** ****** ******* * *** ** ******* *** * * ********* ********* * *** ** *
Th is e-mai lis t he  pr op erty of Enron C orp. and /or itsr e levant  af f ilia t e
andma y contain co nfide nt i al andp r ivi leged m a ter ial  fo r th e s oleu se of
the intended
 still_less than_enchanted with the NGS_settlement _after_SoCalGas
tailored it_to_their interests but_am glad that_the Commission is at_least
considering opening up_the_system ala PG&E.   I think that they are
reasonably aware that SoCalGas was_not_blameless in_the_runup_in gas prices
that took place_last December.   Having_said that_we are having a hell of a
time in_the_GCIM simply trying_to investigate what really happened.
SoCalGas latest excuse for not_giving us info is that we_will "competitors"
with them_(as_a_result of the filed_rate litigation) for gas hedges. _I
must have misunderstood; I did not_realize there was a limited supply of
hedges_available and that there was competition_for those "available"
hedges.  _Anytime Enron_wants to help on these_GCIM issues, we_would
welcome it--might_make you look_less like a Texas robber baron.

Douglas_Porter, Senior Attorney
Southern_California Edison Company
(626)302-3964
(626)302-3990(fax)
douglas.porter@sce.com


   __  ___ _  __ __     __      _   __   _    _     _ _ _          _     _   _ __  __ _      
_ _     _   __     _"Dasovich,     _    ___    _     _  _      __     __     ___    _     _  
      _  _    ___   Jeff"      _ _  _      To:   _ <porterdk@sce.com>     _          _       
_      _   __      _<Jeff.Dasovich@___  _  cc:_  _ _  _ _  __                 _     _    __  
_   _       _       enron.com> __ _   _ _ _Subject:  _ _ _ _      __        ____  _  _  _  __
     _  _   _         _                _ _   _ __     _ _       __           ___  __     ____
_     _      __    _10/12/01 03:18__   _   _          __ ____   _              __    _     __
   _       _    _   PM_                    _    _    _  __  _   _       _                 _  
    _  _ _        _          _             __     _     _   _   __  _ _   _   _       _  _   
       _                    _  __           _ _        _       ___   __    _   _ _      _ _  




Hi Doug:
Hope_all is well.  Congratulations_to you folks on your agreement_with
the_PUC.  Must be a relief.

_I was_writing_to get_your reaction_to_the judge's proposed_order in_the
El Paso_case._ You_think the_Commission_is likely_to adopt_it?_ Change
it?  Judge's proposal fatally flawed_on the market_power issue?
Appreciate your insights.

AND did you_hear Bilas issued the our gas_settlement_as his_proposed
decision for adoption by the Commission at its 10.25.01_meeting!?!?!
What next?

Best,
Jeff


**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property_of Enron_Corp. and/or its relevant_affiliate
and may contain confidential_and privileged_material for_the_sole use of
the intended