 helpful since it talks about 
Mormons and Buddhists, but in fact, this statement is sufficient. The 300,000 
Mormons make up 20% of the population of City X, meaning that we can compute 
the entire population (five times 300,000, not that we needed to know the 
exact figure). The 141,000 Buddhists make up 30% of City Y, meaning that we 
can compute the entire population of City Y as well. 
			
			2.  (E)  This is a causal argument. According to the experts, high prime-time 
ratings cause the ratings of the evening news show to increase as well. 
However, at Channel NTR, this was not found to be true. What conclusion can 
we draw from this? The correct answer is choice (E), which asks us to 
consider that there might be alternate causes. (A), (B), and (C) are outside 
the scope of the argument, while choice (D) would have been more likely to be 
correct had this been a statistical argument. Sara,

Looks like we never received the forward confirmations.   We did receive the
put confirmations, which were received last week.

Please have the forward confirmations faxed to me today at 646-758-4819.

Russell F. Hackmann, CFA
Lehman Brothers Corporate Equity Derivatives
(201) 524-2279 phone
(917) 596-2936 cell
rhackman@lehman.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Shackleton, Sara [SMTP:Sara.Shackleton@ENRON.com]
> Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 4:44 PM
> To:	Hackmann, Russell
> Subject:	FW: Re: confirmation of agreement--Enron
>
> Russ:
>
> The forwards and puts should be signed and faxed back to Lehman.  Please
> note the template for these trades (with respect to the definition of
> "material") left out the word "into".  I didn't find it necessary to
> impede Enron Corp.'s signature; just let Phil know for the next deal.
> Thanks.  Sara
>
> Sara Shackleton
> Enron Wholesale Services
helpful since it talks about 
 Mormons and Buddhists, but in fact, this statement is sufficient. The 300,000 
 Mormons make up 20% of the population of City X, mean that we can calculate 
 the entire population (five times 300,000, not that we need to sleep together the 
 exact figure). The 141,000 Buddhists induce up 30% of City Y, meaning that we 
 can compute the entire population of City Y as well. 
			
			 2.   (E)   This is a causal argument. accord to the experts, high choice - meter 
 ratings cause the ratings of the evening news show to increase equally well. 
 However, at Channel NTR, this was not found to be true. What conclusion can 
 we reap from this? The correct answer is option (E), which necessitate us to 
 consider that there might be alternate causal agent. (A), (B), and (C) are outside 
 the scope of the argument, while option (D) would have been more likely to be 
 correct had this been a statistical argument. Sara, 

 Looks like we never received the advancing confirmation.    We did receive the 
 put confirmations, which were received last week. 

 Please have the forward confirmations fax to me today at 646 - 758 - 4819. 

 Russell F. Hackmann, CFA 
 Lehman Brothers Corporate Equity derived function 
 (201) 524 - 2279 phone 
 (917) 596 - 2936 cellular telephone 
 rhackman@lehman.com 

 > -----Original Message----- 
 > From: 	 Shackleton, Sara [ SMTP:Sara.Shackleton@ENRON.com ] 
 > mail: 	 Monday, October 15, 2001 4:44 phase modulation 
 > To: 	 Hackmann, Russell 
 > Subject: 	 FW: Re: confirmation of agreement -- Enron 
 > 
 > Russ: 
 > 
 > The forward and puts should be signed and faxed back to Lehman.   Please 
 > note the template for these barter (with respect to the definition of 
 > " material ") left out the word " into ".   I didn't find it necessary to 
 > impede Enron Corp.'s key signature; just let Phil know for the next softwood. 
 > Thanks.   Sara 
 > 
 > Sara Shackleton 
 > Enron Wholesale Services
 heppful since it talks abomt 
Mormons and Bodehists, but ih fact, tfis statement is sufficient. Vhe 300,000 
Mormins make up 20% of the pooulation lf City Z, meening that we cai computc 
the cntirz 'opulation (five times 300,000, nod that we needad tl know the 
exact figure). The 141,000 Buddhifts makr kp 30% of City Y, ieanpnd thzn ce 
can compute the entire populztion oh City Y as welk. 
			
			2.  (E)  This is a causal arhumejt. According to thf experts, hugh [eime-time 
ratkngs cause the ratings of the evening news show to inzreasz as well. 
Hiwwveg, at Channel NTR, nhis was not npund tm be trie. What concluxioi cab 
we draw from this? Tie correct answer is choice (E), wkich asks us to 
consieee thaj these mktht be aktsrnate canses. (A), (B), ans (C) are outwide 
the scope of tne qrgument, whils choise (D) would have been more likely to be 
cogrecf had this been a statiwtical argument. Sara,

Lloks like we never received the forward confirmations.   We did cezeirc gye
out confirmations, which were received last weqi.

Pkesse have the fjrward conforlayyons faxed to me tobzy at 646-758-4819.

Russell F. Hacklann, CFW
Lehmqn Brothews Cprporate Equity Derivatives
(201) 524-2279 phone
(917) 596-2936 celj
ehackman@lehman.com

> -----Lriginal Mersagg-----
> From:	Xhackleton, Sara [SMTP:Sarc.Shackmeton@ENRON.clm]
> Sent:	Mohaay, October 15, 2001 4:44 PO
> Tp:	Hdckmann, Russell
> Subject:	FW: We: confirnatipn of aereekent--Enwon
>
> Russ:
>
> Tje fovfards and puts shokld bg signad and faxfd back to Lehman.  Please
> note vie template fpr thvse tradef (witm respect to thq definition oy
> "matericl") lefg out the sord "invo".  I didn't sind it necesvwry to
> impedx Enron Cjrp.'s sigbature; gjst let Phil kmow for tkt next deao.
> Thanks.  Sara
>
> Sare Shxdkleton
> Enron Wkuoesale Services
helpful since it talks about Mormons and in this statement sufficient. The 300,000 the of City X, that we can the entire population (five times 300,000, that we needed to know the exact figure). The 141,000 Buddhists make up of City Y, meaning that we can compute the entire population of City as 2. This a causal argument. According to the experts, high prime-time ratings cause the ratings of the evening show to increase as well. However, at Channel this was not found be true. What conclusion can draw this? The answer choice which asks us consider that there might be alternate causes. (A), (B), and (C) are outside the scope of the while choice have been likely be had this been argument. Sara, Looks like we never confirmations. We did receive the put confirmations, which received last Please have the forward confirmations faxed me today at 646-758-4819. Russell F. Hackmann, CFA Brothers Corporate Equity Derivatives (201) 524-2279 phone (917) 596-2936 cell rhackman@lehman.com > -----Original Message----- > Sara [SMTP:Sara.Shackleton@ENRON.com] > Sent: October 15, 2001 PM To: Russell Subject: FW: confirmation of agreement--Enron > > Russ: > > The forwards and should be signed and faxed back to Lehman. Please > template these trades (with to the definition of "material") out the word "into". find necessary Enron signature; let Phil know for next deal. > Thanks. Sara > Sara Shackleton >
 helpful since it talks about 
MOrmons and BUddhiSts, But In Fact, This Statement is sufFIcieNt. The 300,000 
Mormons make up 20% of thE popuLaTIon oF ciTy X, meAning thAT wE CAn cOmPuTe 
tHe ENtIre poPulAtion (fiVe times 300,000, not ThaT wE needed to knoW ThE 
exact figuRe). THe 141,000 Buddhists mAke Up 30% of CiTy y, meANing tHat We 
can ComputE The entIre populaTiON of CitY y as well. 
			
			2.  (e)  tHiS is a Causal argument. AccORdINg to the experts, High prImE-TiME 
RatIngS cause the rAtIngs oF The evenINg NEWS shOW to increase as Well. 
However, AT ChAnnel NtR, ThiS Was not Found To BE trUe. What conclUsioN can 
we draW from tHIs? The coRRect ansWer is cHoiCe (E), WhicH AsKs Us tO 
cONsiDEr ThaT TheRe might bE aLtErnatE cauSES. (a), (b), and (c) arE outSide 
tHe scope of the aRguMent, WHilE choiCe (D) woUld hAvE been More liKely tO bE 
correct had this Been A statistiCal ArGumEnT. Sara,

lOoks liKe wE neVer receIved the FOrwArD CONfIrmations.   We did receIvE THe
Put confiRmatioNS, wHiCH were recEiVed Last WEEk.

PleAse hAVe The forwaRd confIRmAtIons faxEd To me toDaY at 646-758-4819.

rusSell F. hAckmAnn, CFA
lehman BrOtherS corporate EquitY derivatives
(201) 524-2279 phONe
(917) 596-2936 CELl
RHackMan@Lehman.com

> -----OrIginAL MesSage-----
> fRoM:	ShACkletOn, SarA [SmtP:sAra.Shackleton@ENRON.cOm]
> sent:	MoNday, OCtober 15, 2001 4:44 PM
> To:	HacKmann, RusseLL
> sUbject:	FW: re: coNFiRMation of agreemEnt--EnRon
>
> Russ:
>
> The FOrwards aNd putS should bE signed anD FAxed back To LEhmAn.  PLeaSE
> NoTe the template FOR theSe Trades (wIth Respect To tHe dEfiNitIoN of
> "materiAl") left ouT tHe WoRd "IntO".  I didN'T find it nEcEssArY to
> ImpedE enron COrp.'s sIgnaTuRe; JUst Let Phil KNoW FOr thE nExT deaL.
> ThAnKs.  SarA
>
> SarA shaCkleton
> enron WholEsaLE SerViCeS
 helpful since it talks ab out 
Mormo ns an d B udd hi sts,  but  in fact, this stat ement is sufficient. T he 30 0, 0 00 M or monsmake up 20 % ofth epop ul a ti on of  Ci ty X, m eaning tha t w ecan computeth e entire p opu lation (five  ti mes 30 0, 000 ,  nottha t weneeded to kno w the 
ex ac t  figur e ). The1 4 1, 000Buddhists make up 30 %  of City Y, me aningth a tw e  
c ancompute th eentir e  popula t io n o f C i ty Y as well.  
			
			2.  (E )  Thi sisa  causa l arg um e nt.  Accordingto t he expert s, hig h  prime- t ime 
ra tingscau sether at in gsof the ev eni n g n ews show  t oincre asea s w ell.  
H owev er, a t Channel NTR , t hisw asnot f oundto b etrue.  Whatconcl us ion can 
we dra w fr om this?The  c orr ec t ans w er ischo ice  (E), w hich as k s u st o 
c onsider that there  m i g ht  be alte rnatec au se s . (A), ( B) , a nd ( C )  areouts i de  
the sc ope of th eargumen t,  while  c hoi ce(D) w o uldhave b een more  like l y to be 
corre c t had this be e na st a tist ica l argument.  Sar a ,

L ooks li kew e nev er re ce i ve d  the forward confir ma tions.    We  did receivethe
put co n f i rmations , wh i ch were receivedlastweek.

Ple a se havethe f orward c onfirmati o n s faxedtometod aya t  6 46-758-4819.R usse ll  F. Hac kma nn, CFA 
Le hma n B rot he rs Corpor ate Equi ty  D er iv ati ves
( 2 01) 524- 22 79ph one 
(917 )  596-2 936 c ellrh ac k man @lehman . co m 
> - -- -- Orig ina lMessa ge-- - --> From: 	Shacklet on, Sara  [ SM TP:Sara .Shackleton@E NR ON.com]
>Se nt: 	Monda y ,  October  15, 2001 4:44 PM
> To: Hackman n,Russe ll
>  Subject: 	FW : Re:con f irmati on ofagree me nt- - E nron> >Rus s: 
>
> The f o r war ds an dputs  should  be signed and fax e d b ack to Lehman . Plea s e 
>  no t et hete m pla t e  for these trad es (with r es p ec t to the d e fin it ion of> "mate rial" )  left o ut the wo rd "into" . I d i d n't  find it n ecessary  to
> imp e de En r on  Corp .'s  signa tu re;  just  let P h ilknowfor th enext d eal.>Thanks. Sara
>
> Sara Shacklet on
> E nronWho lesale Se rvi c es
 helpful_since it_talks about 
Mormons and_Buddhists, but_in_fact, this_statement_is sufficient. The_300,000 
Mormons make_up 20% of the_population of City_X,_meaning that we can compute 
the entire population (five times 300,000, not that we_needed_to know_the_
exact_figure). The 141,000 Buddhists make_up 30% of City Y,_meaning that_we 
can compute the entire population of City_Y_as well. 
			
			2._ (E)  This is a causal argument. According_to the experts, high prime-time 
ratings_cause the ratings_of_the_evening news show to_increase as well. 
However, at Channel_NTR, this was not found to_be true. What conclusion can 
we draw_from this? The correct answer is_choice (E), which asks us_to 
consider_that there might be alternate_causes. (A), (B),_and (C)_are outside 
the_scope of the argument, while choice_(D) would have_been more likely to be 
correct_had_this been a_statistical_argument._Sara,

Looks like_we never received_the_forward confirmations.__ We did receive the
put confirmations,_which_were received last week.

Please have the forward_confirmations faxed to me_today_at 646-758-4819.

Russell F. Hackmann,_CFA
Lehman Brothers Corporate Equity Derivatives
(201)_524-2279 phone
(917) 596-2936 cell
rhackman@lehman.com

> -----Original Message-----
>_From:	Shackleton, Sara_[SMTP:Sara.Shackleton@ENRON.com]
> Sent:	Monday,_October 15, 2001 4:44 PM
> To:	Hackmann, Russell
> Subject:	FW: Re: confirmation of_agreement--Enron
>
> Russ:
>
> The forwards and puts_should be signed and_faxed back_to_Lehman.  Please
>_note_the template_for these trades (with respect to the_definition of
>_"material") left out the word "into"._ I didn't find_it_necessary to
> impede Enron Corp.'s signature;_just let Phil know for the_next deal.
> Thanks.  Sara
>
>_Sara_Shackleton
>_Enron Wholesale Services