 turnback capacity, including Block II, for primary delivery to delivery points other than PG&E Topock if capacity is available at those other delivery points.	
1/19/2000 Order on Negotiated Rate Transactions  (Enron & Williams)	Block II capacity has primary delivery rights only at PG&E Topock and alternative rights at the other Topock delivery points. Rejects CPUC argument against the recall provisions, which are the same as ultimately accepted in the Dynegy deal (see 10/19/99, 7/29/99, 9/17/98 and 6/11/98 orders) and provide (1) that there is no right of recall if the Block II capacity is simply idle, (2) that the capacity may be recalled if it is being used to serve points other than those behind PG&E Topock, and (3) if so recalled, it may be recalled by the original shipper for its own use in the PG&E service territory upon 24 hours notice. Clarifies, as in Dynegy, that the shipper (Enron) must use all its other Block II capacity before recalling other Block II capacity, but is not required to use Block I or Block III capacity first.	
10/19/1999 Order on Rehearing and Clarification (Dynegy)	Denies rehearing of 7/29/99 order 	
7/29/1999 Order on Rehearing and Compliance Filing (Dynegy)	 Affirms that PG&E and the CPUC are entitled to have the Block II capacity recalled to northern California even if it is under contract [to Dynegy]. Reverses previous ruling -- does not require that all other capacity to California be utilized before Block II capacity can be recalled. Per Settlement, recalling shipper must pay max rate to recall if its contract is one month or less.  If for more than one month, the rate must equal or exceed the rate of the existing shipper. On 24 hours notice, the existing shipper (i.e., Dynegy) may recall for its own use to serve northern California markets, capacity that was recalled for use by other shippers, even if those shippers are willing to pay a higher rate. Clarifies that if the Block II capacity is idle but is not being used to serve areas outside of northern California, [Dynegy] may hold the capacity without any obligation to release it.	
9/17/1998 Letter Order on
turnback capacity, including Block II, for primary delivery to rescue point other than PG&E Topock if capacity is available at those other pitch points. 	
 1/19/2000 Order on Negotiated Rate Transactions   (Enron & Williams) 	 Block II capacitance have primary manner of speaking rights only at PG&E Topock and alternate rights at the other Topock delivery points. cull CPUC argument against the recall provisions, which are the like as ultimately accepted in the Dynegy softwood (attend 10/19/99, 7/29/99, 9/17/98 and 6/11/98 orders) and provide (1) that there is no right field of recall if the Block II capacity is simply baseless, (2) that the capacity may be remember if it is being used to serve points other than those behind PG&E Topock, and (3) if so recall, it may be recalled by the original shipper for its own use in the PG&E service territory upon 24 hours notice. Clarifies, as in Dynegy, that the shipper (Enron) must use all its other Block II capacity before recalling other Block II capacity, but is not required to use Block I or Block III capacity first. 	
 10/19/1999 Order on Rehearing and Clarification (Dynegy) 	 Denies rehear of 7/29/99 ordering 	
 7/29/1999 Order on Rehearing and Compliance Filing (Dynegy) 	  affirm that PG&E and the CPUC are entitled to have the Block II capacity recalled to northerly California even if it is under contract [ to Dynegy ]. Reverses previous ruling -- does not require that all early capacity to California be utilized before Block II capacity can be recalled. Per Settlement, recalling shipper must pay max rate to recall if its contract is one month or less.   If for more than one month, the rate must equal or surpass the rate of the exist shipper. On 24 hour notice, the existing shipper (i.e., Dynegy) may recall for its own use to service northern California markets, capacity that was echo for use by other shippers, even if those shippers are uncoerced to pay a higher rate. Clarifies that if the Block II capacity is idle but is not being use to serve area outside of northern California, [ Dynegy ] may oblige the capacity without any debt instrument to release it. 	
 9/17/1998 Letter Order on
 tugnback capacity, includinn Block II, for ptinary dxlivery to delixery points other than PG&E Tlpick id capacity is availabld at thosv other dwlivtry points.	
1/19/2000 Order on Negotlcted Dwte Crensactions  (Enrpn & Williaks)	Block II capdcktv has primary delivery rights only ae PG&E Tpplck and alternwtivt ryghta at the other Topock delivery poihts. Rejtcts CPUC argument against the recall provislons, which are the samf as ultimajsly qccepted in ghe Dynegy deal (see 10/19/99, 7/29/99, 9/17/98 and 6/11/98 orders) and provide (1) that ghere is no rigyt of tecall if thx Bloch II capacitn is sikply idke, (2) that the csparity may be recalled if iv is being used to sgrve pointv kther than those veyind KG&E Tmpocy, ana (3) jf sk recaplev, it may be recalled bt the original shipker dor its own uae in ehq PG&E service territory upon 24 hours notpce. Dlarifies, as in Dynegy, rhat the shipper (Enroj) must usq all its other Block II capacity before recallinc othxr Blich UI capacity, but is not required to use Block I jd Nlpck III capaciby first.	
10/19/1999 Order on Tejesting and Clariwication (Synegy)	Denies reheaging of 7/29/99 ordwr 	
7/29/1999 Order on Tehearing and Compliance Fioing (Dynegy)	 Cffurms that PG&E and che CPUC are entotled to have the Block II ccpacitg recalled ho northedv California evev in id is undtf contract [to Dynqgy]. Reverwes 'revious rulong -- djes not reeuire that all other capwcity tm Californla be utilized before Block II repacity can bg racanled. Per Settkement, recallyng shipper muxt pay iax rxte to reczll if mts contract is one month lr less.  If hor more ehan one month, gfe rate must eaual or eqcted the rare of the existing shklper. On 24 hours uuuixe, the existinb sfip[eg (i.x., Dynqcy) may recaln fof igx own use to serye vortnern California markats, dapacity that was tegalled fot use by jther shipperx, even if those shlpperv ace wilkind to pay a higher rate. Clarifiss that iv tme Block II cwpaclty ys idle buc is not being used to serve areas outsive of northern Californua, [Dynegy] may hold jhe capacity wmthout any oblication to release it.	
9/17/1998 Letter Order on
turnback capacity, including Block II, for primary delivery other than Topock if capacity delivery 1/19/2000 Order on Rate Transactions (Enron Williams) Block II capacity has primary rights only at PG&E Topock and alternative rights at the other Topock delivery Rejects CPUC argument against the recall provisions, which are the same as ultimately in Dynegy (see 7/29/99, 9/17/98 and 6/11/98 orders) and provide (1) that there is no right of recall if Block II capacity is simply idle, (2) that capacity may be recalled it is being used to points than those PG&E and if so recalled, may be recalled by the original shipper for its own use in the PG&E service territory upon hours notice. in Dynegy, the (Enron) use all its II capacity before recalling other Block is not required to use Block I or III capacity 10/19/1999 Order on Rehearing and Clarification Denies rehearing of 7/29/99 order 7/29/1999 Order on and Compliance Filing (Dynegy) Affirms that PG&E and the CPUC are entitled to have the capacity recalled to northern even if it under [to Reverses ruling -- not require that all other capacity to California be utilized before II capacity can be recalled. Per Settlement, recalling shipper must rate recall if its is one month or If more than one month, must or of existing On 24 hours notice, existing shipper (i.e., Dynegy) may for its own use capacity that was recalled for use by other even if those shippers are willing to a higher rate. Clarifies that if the Block II capacity is idle is not to serve areas outside of northern California, [Dynegy] hold the capacity without obligation to release it. 9/17/1998 Letter Order on
 turnback capacity, including block II, for PrimaRy dEliVeRy to DeliVery points otheR Than pG&E Topock if capacity is aVailaBlE At thOSe Other DeliverY PoINTs.	
1/19/2000 ORdEr On NEgOTiAted RAte transacTions  (Enron & wilLiAms)	Block II caPAcIty has primAry Delivery righTs oNly at Pg&E topOCk and AltErnatIve rigHTs at thE other TopOcK DeliveRY points. rEJeCts CpUC argument againsT ThE Recall provisioNs, whicH aRE tHE SamE as Ultimately AcCepteD In the DyNEgY DEAl (sEE 10/19/99, 7/29/99, 9/17/98 and 6/11/98 orders) and Provide (1) that THerE is no rIgHt oF Recall If the blOCk Ii capacity is SimpLy idle, (2) thaT the caPAcity maY Be recalLed if iT is BeiNg usED tO sErvE pOIntS OtHer THan Those behInD Pg&E TopOck, aND (3) IF So reCalLed, iT may bE recalled by thE orIginAL shIpper For itS own UsE in thE PG&E seRvice TeRritory upon 24 hourS notIce. ClarifIes, As In DYnEgy, thAT the shIppEr (ENron) musT use all ITs oThER bLoCk II capacity before ReCALlIng other block Ii CaPaCIty, but is NoT reQuirED To use blocK i oR Block IIi capacITy FiRst.	
10/19/1999 OrdeR oN ReheaRiNg aNd CLarifICatiOn (DyneGy)	Denies ReheaRIng of 7/29/99 order 	
7/29/1999 OrdeR On Rehearing anD coMPLiANce FIliNg (Dynegy)	 AffIrms THat Pg&E anD ThE CPuc are eNtitlEd TO hAVe the Block II capacitY rEcalleD to noRthern CaliforNia even if iT IS Under conTracT [To dYnegy]. Reverses pRevioUs ruling -- doES not requIre thAt all othEr capacitY TO CaliforNia Be uTilIzeD BEfOre Block II capACIty cAn Be recalLed. per SettLemEnt, RecAllInG shipper mUst pay maX rAtE tO rEcaLl if iTS contracT iS onE mOntH or leSS.  If for More tHan oNe MoNTh, tHe rate mUSt EQUal oR eXcEed tHe rAtE of thE exiSTinG shippeR. On 24 hours nOtiCE, the ExIsTing shiPper (i.e., Dynegy) mAy Recall for iTs Own Use to sERVe northeRn California markets, capaCIty that Was RecalLed fOr use by otHer ShippeRs, eVEn if thOse shiPpers ArE wiLLIng to PAY a HigHeR rate. ClariFIEs tHat if ThE BloCk II capAcity is idle but is noT BeiNg used to serve AreAs ouTSIdE of NOrTHerN CALifORNia, [Dynegy] may holD the capaciTy WItHout any oblIGatIoN to releAse it.	
9/17/1998 LeTter ORDer on
 turnback capacity, includ ing BlockII, f orpri ma ry d eliv ery to deliver y  poi nts other than PG&E To pockif capa c it y isavailab l ea t  th os eoth er de liver y p oints.
1/19/2000  Or de r on Negotia t ed  Rate Tran sac tions  (Enro n &  Willi am s)B lockIIcapac ity ha s  prima ry delive ry rights only at P G& E To pock and alternat i ve rights at theotherTo p oc k del ive ry points.  R eject s  CPUC a r gu m e n t a g ainst the rec all provisi o ns,  which  a ret he sam e asul t ima tely accept ed i n the Dyn egy de a l (see1 0/19/99 , 7/29 /99 , 9 /17/ 9 8an d 6 /1 1 /98 or der s ) a nd provi de  ( 1) th at t h e r e  isnorigh t ofrecall if the  Bl ockI I c apaci ty is  sim pl y idl e, (2)  that  t he capacity may  berecalledifit  is  b eingu sed to  se rve  points  othert han  t h o s ebehind PG&E Topock ,a n d(3) if s o reca l le d, it may b erec alle d by th e or i gi nal ship per fo r  i ts  own us ein the  P G&E  se rvice terr itoryupon 24hours notice. Clarif i es, as in Dyn e gy , th a t th e s hipper (Enr on)m ustusea ll  it s  othe r Blo ck II capacity before rec al ling o therBlock II capa city, buti s not requ ired to use Block I or  Bloc k III capa c ity firs t.	
1 0/19/199 9 Order o n Rehearin g a ndCla rif i c at ion (Dynegy)D e nies  r ehearin g o f 7/29/ 99ord er	
7 /2 9/1999 Or der on R eh ea ri ng  an d Com p liance F il ing  ( Dyn egy)Affirm s tha t PG &E  a n d t he CPUC ar e enti tl ed  tohav ethe B lock IIcapacit y recalle d t o  nor th er n Calif ornia even if  i t is under  c ont ract [ t o  Dynegy] . Reverses previous rul i ng -- d oes  notrequ ire thatall  other  ca p acityto Cal iforn ia  be u tiliz e d  b efo re  Block IIc a pac ity c an  berecalle d. Per Settlement, rec alling shippe r m ustp a ymax ra t e t or eca l l  if its contrac t is one m on t hor less. I f f or  more t han one  mont h , the r ate mustequal orex ceed t herate of th e existi ng shippe r . On2 4hours  no tice,th e e xisti ng shi p per  (i.e ., Dyn eg y) may  reca ll  for its  own use to serve north ern Ca lifor nia  markets,  ca p aci ty that w as r ecalled fo r u seby ot her shipp ers, ev eni f tho se s h ippers ar e  w ill i n gto pay a hi g h e r r ate.Cla r ifiesthat  if the Block IIc apacity is idl e bu t isnot bein gused to serveare as o utside o fnorthern Ca lifornia ,[ Dyneg y] may  holdthe cap a c it y  witho ut a nyobligatio n t or eleaseit .9/17/1 998Le tter O rder o n 
 turnback_capacity, including_Block II, for primary_delivery to_delivery_points other_than_PG&E Topock if_capacity is available_at those other delivery_points.	
1/19/2000 Order on_Negotiated_Rate Transactions  (Enron & Williams)	Block II capacity has primary delivery rights only at_PG&E_Topock and_alternative_rights_at the other Topock delivery_points. Rejects CPUC argument against_the recall_provisions, which are the same as ultimately accepted_in_the Dynegy deal_(see 10/19/99, 7/29/99, 9/17/98 and 6/11/98 orders) and provide_(1) that there is no right_of recall if_the_Block_II capacity is simply_idle, (2) that the capacity may_be recalled if it is being_used to serve points other than those_behind PG&E Topock, and (3) if_so recalled, it may be_recalled by_the original shipper for its_own use in_the PG&E_service territory upon_24 hours notice. Clarifies, as in_Dynegy, that the_shipper (Enron) must use all its_other_Block II capacity_before_recalling_other Block_II capacity, but_is_not required_to_use Block I or Block III_capacity_first.	
10/19/1999 Order on Rehearing and Clarification (Dynegy)	Denies_rehearing of 7/29/99 order_	
7/29/1999_Order on Rehearing and_Compliance Filing (Dynegy)	 Affirms that_PG&E and the CPUC are entitled_to have_the Block_II capacity recalled to northern California even if it is under_contract [to Dynegy]. Reverses previous ruling_-- does not require_that all_other_capacity to California_be_utilized before_Block II capacity can be recalled. Per_Settlement, recalling_shipper must pay max rate to_recall if its contract_is_one month or less.  If_for more than one month, the_rate must equal or exceed_the_rate_of the existing shipper. On_24 hours notice, the existing shipper_(i.e., Dynegy) may_recall for its own use to serve_northern_California markets, capacity that was recalled_for_use by other shippers, even if_those_shippers_are willing to pay a_higher rate. Clarifies that if the_Block II capacity is idle but is not being_used to serve_areas outside of northern California,_[Dynegy]_may_hold the capacity without any obligation to release it.	
9/17/1998 Letter_Order on