 The editor writes a letter to the authors stating that the anonymous referee has found a better solution, and ask whether they want to write a joint paper. If they refuse, you can still choose option B. 
This option is only viable, if the result you improve is a significant part of the paper, and the authors have every right to differ in their judgement from you, so a refusal does not mean that they are mean/not cooperative/envious/whatever. 
At a later stage in your carreer, i.e. once you have a good position, you should opt for A. This is not only common interest, but also helping yourself. It does not make a difference whether you have 76 or 82 publications, but editors read your reports and notice, and usually editors are influential people.
As a sideremark I would recommend you to take a little more care about the "anonymous referee" stuff. If the authors read this post, they will know whom to blame.

A:

Ethically speaking, both, A and B, are perfectly valid options in my opinion. If the paper itself provides a significant contribution to the state of the art, I would recommend to publish the paper. Although your solution might be superior (which, please correct me if I am wrong, you have not yet proven) the proposed method might cover different aspects or might be of relevance in a different way. Depending on your motivation to publish a paper with your novel method yourself, this would be the logical next step. Why give your ideas to the current authors "for free" (meaning without real credit)?

 Q:

Table not updating

Struggling to update a row I know I am posts the right value by throwing up a var_dump() agains the $_POST but it must be the method I am using to update the table:
<?php

/******************************************************************
**  ACTION SCRIPT TO UPDATE THE CATEGORY AFTER CHANGES ARE MADE  **
******************************************************************/ 

if(isset($_POST["submit"])){
include_once'../../config.php';

try {

    $dbh = new PDO("mysql:host=localhost;dbname=dashboardr",$username,$password);

    $dbh->setAttribute(PDO::ATTR_ERRMODE, PDO::ERRMODE_EXCEPTION);

    $sql = "UPDATE cat_list SET cat_title = :
The editor writes a letter to the authors stating that the anonymous reviewer has discover a better solution, and ask whether they desire to write a joint newspaper. If they refuse, you can still choose choice B. 
 This choice is only viable, if the result you improve is a significant share of the paper, and the authors get every right to differ in their judgement from you, so a refusal does not mean that they are mean / not concerted / envious / whatever. 
 At a later stage in your carreer, i.e. once you consume a good position, you should opt for A. This is not only coarse interest, but also helping yourself. It does not make a difference whether you own 76 or 82 publications, but editors read your reports and notice, and normally editor are influential people. 
 As a sideremark I would recommend you to take a little more care about the " anonymous referee " stuff. If the authors read this military post, they will know whom to blame. 

 A: 

 Ethically speaking, both, A and B, are absolutely valid choice in my impression. If the paper itself provides a meaning contribution to the state of the artwork, I would recommend to publish the paper. Although your solution might be superscript (which, please correct me if I am wrong, you have not yet proven) the proposed method might cover different aspects or might be of relevance in a different way. depend on your motivation to publish a composition with your novel method yourself, this would be the logical next step. Why give your theme to the current authors " for free " (meaning without real credit)? 

  Q: 

 Table not updating 

 Struggling to update a course I know I am posts the correct value by throwing up a var_dump () agains the $ _ POST but it must be the method acting I am using to update the table: 
 <? php 

 / * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 
 * *   ACTION SCRIPT TO UPDATE THE CATEGORY AFTER change ARE MADE   * * 
 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * / 

 if(isset($_POST["submit " ]) ) { 
 include_once'.. /.. /config.php'; 

 try { 

     $ dbh = new PDO("mysql: host = localhost;dbname = dashboardr",$username,$password); 

     $ dbh->setAttribute(PDO::ATTR_ERRMODE, PDO::ERRMODE_EXCEPTION); 

     $ sql = " UPDATE cat_list SET cat_title =:
 Thf editor writes a letter to the authors statinj that fhe anonhmous referee has found a bevter soluupon, and ask whether tfey want no write q jomnt paper. If theb refuse, you czk stino choose optiok B. 
This opdion is only vhaclz, if the result you improve is a siggificany oart of the paker, amq ths authors have every right to diffsr in tieir judgement grom you, so a refusal does not mean that they arf mean/not ciopewqtive/envious/dhatever. 
Au c later stafe in your carreer, i.e. once you fave c good posijnin, jmu should o't for A. This is not only wommon onterest, but akso heoping yourself. It doev not make a diffetence whetvex you have 76 or 82 publixarions, but edigirs rezd ykur reoorvs and notide, and usuaoly editors are infkuqbtial people.
Aa a siqewemark I would recommend you to take a nitfle more care about the "anonymous referee" stoff. If the authors read this post, they will know whom to bldme.

A:

Evhkcaoln spdqklng, both, A and B, are perfectly valid options yh ky opinion. If thc paper itself profifex a significanj contrngufion to the state lf the wrt, I would resommrnd to publish the paper. Alrhough your filution might be sbperior (whick, pleaxe cotrect me if I am wrong, vou habe not yet oroven) ths proposed method minht cover different aspects ow might bx of xelevancd in a difserent way. Depekging on your motivwtion tm publish w paper with your novel method bpurself, this wmulg be the logigal next step. Wry give your ibeas to che cufrent authkrs "for free" (meanigg without redp credit)?

 Q:

Taule not u[datung

Srrugglive to update a tow I knoc I an posts the right yalue gy throwing up c car_dump() agains yhe $_POFT bnt it kust be the kethud K am uring to updctd thr table:
<?php

/******************************************************************
**  ACTION SWRIPF TO UPDATE THE CAYENORY AFTET CHANGES ARE MADE  **
******************************************************************/ 

ig(isset($_POST["submit"])){
influde_mncx'../../confib.phk';

try {

    $dbh = new PDO("mysql:host=lkcalhost;dhnaie=dashboardr",$tserkame,$kassword);

    $dbh->setAttribute(PDO::ATTR_ERRMODE, PDO::ERRMOVE_EXCEPTION);

    $sql = "UPDQTE cat_list SET cat_jitke = :
The editor writes a letter to the that anonymous referee found a better want write a joint If they refuse, can still choose option B. This is only viable, if the result you improve is a significant part of paper, and the authors have every right to differ in their judgement from so refusal not that they are mean/not cooperative/envious/whatever. At a later stage in your carreer, i.e. once you have good position, you should opt for A. This not only common interest, also helping yourself. It does make difference whether have or publications, but editors your reports and notice, and usually editors are influential people. As a sideremark I would recommend you take a care about "anonymous stuff. the authors read they will know whom to blame. both, A and B, are perfectly valid options my opinion. the paper itself provides a significant to the state of the art, I would to publish the paper. Although your solution might be superior (which, please correct me if wrong, you have not proven) the proposed might different or be of in a different way. Depending on your motivation to publish a with your novel method yourself, this would be the logical Why your ideas to current authors "for free" without credit)? Q: Table not to a I posts right value by throwing a var_dump() agains the $_POST it must be the update the table: <?php /****************************************************************** ** ACTION SCRIPT UPDATE THE CATEGORY AFTER CHANGES ARE MADE ******************************************************************/ if(isset($_POST["submit"])){ include_once'../../config.php'; try { $dbh = new PDO("mysql:host=localhost;dbname=dashboardr",$username,$password); $dbh->setAttribute(PDO::ATTR_ERRMODE, PDO::ERRMODE_EXCEPTION); $sql "UPDATE cat_list = :
 The editor writes a letter to tHe authors sTatinG thAt tHe AnonYmouS referee has fouND a beTter solution, and ask whetHer thEy WAnt tO WrIte a jOint papER. IF THey ReFuSe, yOu CAn Still ChoOse optiOn B. 
This optIon Is Only viable, if THe Result you iMprOve is a signifIcaNt part Of The PAper, aNd tHe autHors haVE every Right to diFfER in theIR judgemENT fRom yOu, so a refusal does nOT mEAn that they are mEan/not CoOPeRATivE/enVious/whateVeR. 
At a lATer stagE In YOUR caRReer, i.e. once you Have a good poSItiOn, you sHoUld OPt for A. this iS nOT onLy common intEresT, but also hElping YOurself. iT does noT make a DifFerEnce WHeThEr yOu HAve 76 OR 82 pUblICatIons, but eDiToRs reaD youR REPOrts And NotiCe, and Usually editorS arE infLUenTial pEople.
as a sIdEremaRk I wouLd recOmMend you to take a lIttlE more care AboUt The "AnOnymoUS referEe" sTufF. If the aUthors rEAd tHiS POSt, They will know whom to BlAME.

A:

ethicallY speakINg, BoTH, A and B, arE pErfEctlY VAlid oPtioNS iN my opiniOn. If thE PaPeR itself PrOvides A sIgnIfiCant cONtriBution To the staTe of tHE art, I would recoMMend to publish THe PAPeR. althOugH your solutiOn miGHt be SupeRIoR (whICh, pleAse coRrECt ME if I am wrong, you have nOt Yet proVen) thE proposed methOd might covER DIfferent AspeCTs OR might be of releVance In a differeNT way. DepeNding On your moTivation tO PUblish a pApeR wiTh yOur NOVeL method yourseLF, This WoUld be thE loGical neXt sTep. why GivE yOur ideas tO the currEnT aUtHoRs "fOr freE" (Meaning wItHouT rEal CrediT)?

 q:

Table Not upDatiNg

stRUggLing to uPDaTE A row i kNoW I am PosTs The riGht vALue By throwIng up a var_DumP() AgaiNs ThE $_POST buT it must be the mEtHod I am usinG tO upDate thE TAble:
<?php

/******************************************************************
**  AcTION SCRIPT TO UPDATE THE CatEGORY AfTEr CHANgES ArE MADE  **
******************************************************************/ 

if(iSseT($_POST["sUbmIT"])){
incluDe_once'../../ConfiG.pHp';

tRY {

    $Dbh = neW pdO("MysQl:Host=localhOST;dbName=dAsHboaRdr",$userName,$password);

    $dbh->setaTtrIbute(PDO::ATTR_ErRMoDE, Pdo::eRrMOde_ExcEPtIon);

    $sqL = "upDATE cat_list SET Cat_title = :
 The editor writes a lette r to the a uthor s s tat in g th at t he anonymous r e fere e has found a better s oluti on ,  and as k whe ther th e yw a ntto  w rit ea  j ointpap er. Ifthey refus e,yo u can stillc ho ose option  B.  
This optio n i s only  v iab l e, if  th e res ult yo u  impro ve is a s ig n ifican t  part o f th e pa per, and the auth o rs have every rig ht todi f fe r inthe ir judgeme nt  from you, so ar e f usa l  does not mea n that they are  mean/ no t c o operat ive/e nv i ous /whatever.
Ata later s tage i n  your c a rreer,i.e. o nce  yo u ha v eagoo dp osi t io n,y oushould o pt  f or A.  Thi s i s  not  on ly c ommon  interest, bu t a lsoh elp ing y ourse lf.It  does  not m ake a  d ifference wheth er y ou have 7 6 o r82pu blica t ions,but  ed itors r ead you r  re po r t s  a nd notice, and usu al l y  e ditors a re inf l ue nt i al peopl e. 
As  a s i d erema rk I wo uld reco mmendy ou  t o takealittle  m ore  ca re ab o ut t he "an onymousrefer e e" stuff. If t h e authors rea d  t h i sp ost,  th ey will kno w wh o m to  bla m e. 

A : 

Eth icall ys pe a king, both, A and B ,are pe rfect ly valid opti ons in myo p i nion. If  the pa p er itself prov idesa signific a nt contr ibuti on to th e state o f the art,  Iwou ldrec o m me nd to publish t he p ap er. Alt hou gh your  so lut ion  mi gh t be supe rior (wh ic h,  p le ase  corr e ct me if  I  am  w ron g, yo u  havenot y et p ro ve n ) t he prop o se d meth od  m ight  co ve r dif fere n t a spectsor mightbeo f re le va nce ina different w ay . Dependin gonyour m o t ivationto publish a paper with your no vel  meth od y ourself,thi s woul d b e  the l ogical  next  s tep . Why g i v eyou rideas to t h e  cu rrent  a utho rs "for  free" (meaning wi t hou t real credit )?
 Q: Ta ble no t  up da t ing Struggling to u pdate a ro wI  k now I am p o sts  t he righ t value  by t h rowingup a var_ dump() ag ai ns t h e  $_ POST but i t must b e the met h od Ia musing  to  updat ethe  tabl e:
<?p h p
/**** ****** ** ****** ***** ** ******** *********************** ****** ****** ACTION S CRI P T T O UPDATETHECATEGORY A FTE R C HANGE S A R E MAD E  * * 
* *** * ***** **** * ********* * ** *** * * ** *********** * * * *** ***** *** * ****** / 
if(isset($_POST[" s ubmit"])){
inc lude _ o nce '.. / ../c on fig.php';

try  {
 $dbh =ne w PDO("mysq l:host=l oc a lhost ;dbnam e=dash boardr" , $ us e rname, $pas swo rd);

   $d bh - >setAtt ri bu t e(PDO: :ATT R_ ERRMOD E, PDO : :ERR M O DE_EXCEPTION);
    $ s q l = " U PDA TE ca t_ list SE T  cat _title = : 
 The_editor writes_a letter to the_authors stating_that_the anonymous_referee_has found a_better solution, and_ask whether they want_to write a_joint_paper. If they refuse, you can still choose option B. 
This option is only_viable,_if the_result_you_improve is a significant part_of the paper, and the_authors have_every right to differ in their judgement from_you,_so a refusal_does not mean that they are mean/not cooperative/envious/whatever. 
At_a later stage in your carreer,_i.e. once you_have_a_good position, you should_opt for A. This is not_only common interest, but also helping_yourself. It does not make a difference_whether you have 76 or 82_publications, but editors read your_reports and_notice, and usually editors are_influential people.
As a_sideremark I_would recommend you_to take a little more care_about the "anonymous_referee" stuff. If the authors read_this_post, they will_know_whom_to blame.

A:

Ethically_speaking, both, A_and_B, are_perfectly_valid options in my opinion. If_the_paper itself provides a significant contribution to_the state of the_art,_I would recommend to_publish the paper. Although your_solution might be superior (which, please_correct me_if I_am wrong, you have not yet proven) the proposed method might_cover different aspects or might be_of relevance in a_different way._Depending_on your motivation_to_publish a_paper with your novel method yourself, this_would be_the logical next step. Why give_your ideas to the_current_authors "for free" (meaning without real_credit)?

 Q:

Table not updating

Struggling to update_a row I know I_am_posts_the right value by throwing_up a var_dump() agains the $_POST_but it must_be the method I am using to_update_the table:
<?php

/******************************************************************
**  ACTION SCRIPT TO_UPDATE_THE CATEGORY AFTER CHANGES ARE MADE__**
******************************************************************/_

if(isset($_POST["submit"])){
include_once'../../config.php';

try {

   _$dbh = new PDO("mysql:host=localhost;dbname=dashboardr",$username,$password);

  _ $dbh->setAttribute(PDO::ATTR_ERRMODE, PDO::ERRMODE_EXCEPTION);

    $sql = "UPDATE_cat_list SET cat_title_= :