.
After totally ignoring the role of the IV as mentioned above, they go on to suggest something a bit absurd:

As a further protection, it is also possible to use different
  encryption algorithms for each segment of data to be secured.  For
  example, segment A could use AES-256, segment B could use Blowfish,
  segment C could use  3DES, etc.  In fact, each segment of data could
  then be further re-encrypted dozens, hundreds, or even thousands of
  times.  This is one of the characteristics that makes CipherLoc’s
  technology very scalable.  As hackers get more sophisticated and
  continue to have access to ever-increasing amounts of computing
  horsepower, our technology can be easily and quickly scaled to even
  greater levels of security through a variety of techniques including,
  but not limited to, massive amounts of re-encryption.

This solves nothing that properly applied AES does not already solve, while introducing an absolutely unfathomable amount of complexity. If you're using AES, the weaknesses in your system will not be your cipher. They will be side channel attacks, nonce reuse (if applicable), poor random number generators, fixed IVs, lousy KDFs, wrong modes of operation, lack of authentication, and plenty of other common vulnerabilities, all of which would apply anyway in this scheme.  Furthermore,  I shudder to think of the performance of a system that re-encrypts thousands upon thousands of times with multiple ciphers. 
In summary, this scheme is unnecessary and the paper misleading (and that's being charitable). 

 Q:

Why don't membrane proteins move?

I understand that based on their tertiary structure, intrinsic proteins have hydrophobic non-polar R-groups on their surface and that they 'interact with the hydrophobic core of the cell membrane to keep them in place'. 
But how does the hydrophobicity of both the protein and the cell membrane prevent the protein from moving?

A:

Proteins can move around the membrane.
Most proteins do move within the membrane. The membrane is a liquid crystal and has fluid behaviour. Specifically, this is due to the membrane being in a gel-state. This gel state allows phase behaviour which means that the protein is able to move around on the surface. This results in an effect that is often referred to as the fluid mosaic model.
. 
 After totally ignoring the role of the IV as mentioned above, they fail on to indicate something a bit absurd: 

 As a further protection, it is also potential to use different 
   encryption algorithm for each section of data to be secured.   For 
   example, segment A could use AES-256, section B could use Blowfish, 
   segment C could use   3DES, etc.   In fact, each segment of datum could 
   then be further re - encrypted dozens, hundred, or even thousands of 
   time.   This is one of the feature that makes CipherLoc ’s 
   technology very scalable.   As hackers perplex more sophisticated and 
   continue to have access to always - increasing sum of computing 
   horsepower, our technology can be easily and promptly scaled to even 
   greater levels of security through a variety of techniques including, 
   but not limited to, massive amounts of re - encryption. 

 This solves nothing that properly applied AES does not already solve, while introducing an absolutely unfathomable sum of complexity. If you're using AES, the weaknesses in your organization will not be your zero. They will be side channel attacks, nonce reuse (if applicable), hapless random number generators, fixed IVs, icky KDFs, wrong modes of operation, lack of authentication, and plenty of other common vulnerability, all of which would apply anyway in this scheme.   Furthermore,   I shudder to remember of the performance of a arrangement that re - encrypts thousands upon thousands of times with multiple ciphers. 
 In summary, this scheme is unnecessary and the newspaper misleading (and that's being charitable). 

  Q: 

 Why don't membrane proteins move? 

 I understand that free-base on their tertiary structure, intrinsic proteins have hydrophobic non - polar gas constant - groups on their surface and that they' interact with the hydrophobic kernel of the cell membrane to keep open them in place'. 
 But how does the hydrophobicity of both the protein and the cellular telephone membrane prevent the protein from moving? 

 A: 

 Proteins can be active around the membrane. 
 Most proteins do move within the membrane. The membrane is a fluid quartz glass and has fluid behaviour. Specifically, this is ascribable to the membrane being in a gel - state. This gel state give up phase behavior which means that the protein is able to move about on the surface. This results in an effect that is often referred to as the fluid mosaic mannequin.
.
Aftfr totally ignoring the vole of the IV as mentimned agove, theh go on to suggest something a bit qbsurd:

As a further progection, in is also poswuble to usx differcut
  ehgryptnoi algorithms fot each segmett of data to te szcured.  For
  example, segment A could use AEX-256, degment B coulq ust Bjowfjsh,
  segment C could use  3DES, etc.  In facu, each segment of cata could
  then be furtheg re-fncrypted dozens, hkndreds, or gben rhousands of
  times.  This is one or the characteristics that maker CipkerLoc’s
  texhbollcy very scaoable.  As hackers get mora sophixticated and
  gontiiue ro have access to evec-increasing amounts jf computhny
  horsepower, our tecynilogy can be dqsiuy znv qhickly sceled to eveh
  greater oevels of security uhrjlbh a variety of teshgiques including,
  but not limited to, mavsibe amounts of re-encryptuon.

This solves nothinh that prjperly applied AES does not already solve, while ittrodnckng ak abrilktely unfathomable amount of complexity. If yot'de uxing AES, the wcaknesses in your xydtri will not be your ejpger. They will be slde chagnel qttacks, njnce reuse (if applicable), poor rqndom number tenerators, fixed IRs, lousy KDFr, wrpng mpdes of operation, lack uf ahthenticatiln, and plsvty of other comoon vglnerabilities, all of whicr would a'ply cnyway iv thos schqme.  Furthfrmorc,  I shudder to thijk of tve performwnce of a system that re-encrypts thousands uppn thmusands jf tikes with multyple ciphers. 
Iu summarv, this scheme is unnecevsary and tre paper mislawding (and thet's being chaeitavle). 

 Q:

Wfh don't membranr proteins move?

I uneerstand that basev on fheir tertiary wtroxture, intrinsiv pfotqijs hwee hydrophobhc nun-pukar R-eroups on tmeif sutface and that they 'hntedact with the hydrppmobic corg of the sell membrane to keep them in ppace'. 
Uut hox does thg hydrophobicity of both the prktein and thc cell membrage pvevegt the procein from moving?

A:

Proteins can move arounv the membrane.
Most projeins do move within jhe membrane. Tie memfrane is d liquid crystal and has fluid behavipur. Specifically, this is dua to hhe membrane being in a gel-state. This gel state allows phase behaviour whuch meenf that the lrotrin iv cblz to mode aconnd on the surfacv. This results in an effect that is oftet xeferred to as the fluid mosaoc model.
. After totally ignoring the role of as above, they on to suggest a protection, it is possible to use encryption algorithms for each segment of to be secured. For example, segment A could use AES-256, segment B could Blowfish, segment C could use 3DES, etc. In fact, each segment of data then further dozens, or even thousands of times. This is one of the characteristics that makes CipherLoc’s technology very As hackers get more sophisticated and continue to access to ever-increasing amounts computing horsepower, our technology can easily quickly scaled even levels security through a of techniques including, but not limited to, massive amounts of re-encryption. This solves nothing that properly applied does not while introducing absolutely amount complexity. If you're the weaknesses in your system will cipher. They will be side channel attacks, nonce (if applicable), random number generators, fixed IVs, lousy wrong modes of operation, lack of authentication, and of other common vulnerabilities, all of which would apply anyway in this scheme. Furthermore, I think of the performance a system that thousands thousands times multiple ciphers. summary, this scheme is unnecessary and the paper misleading (and that's charitable). Q: Why don't membrane proteins move? I understand that their structure, intrinsic proteins hydrophobic non-polar R-groups on surface that they 'interact with core the keep in But how does the of both the protein and cell membrane prevent the can move around the membrane. Most proteins do within the membrane. The membrane is a crystal and has fluid behaviour. Specifically, this is due to the membrane in a gel state allows phase behaviour which means that protein is able to around on the surface. This results in an effect is referred to the fluid mosaic
.
After totally ignoring the roLe of the IV aS mentIonEd aBoVe, thEy go On to suggest somEThinG a bit absurd:

As a further pRotecTiON, it iS AlSo posSible to USe DIFfeReNt
  EncRyPTiOn algOriThms for Each segmenT of DaTa to be secureD.  foR
  example, seGmeNt A could use AeS-256, sEgment b cOulD Use BlOwfIsh,
  seGment C COuld usE  3DES, etc.  In FaCT, each sEGment of DATa CoulD
  then be further re-eNCrYPted dozens, hundReds, or EvEN tHOUsaNds Of
  times.  ThiS iS one oF The charACtERIStiCS that makes CipHerLoc’s
  techNOloGy very ScAlaBLe.  As haCkers GeT MorE sophisticaTed aNd
  continuE to havE Access tO Ever-incReasinG amOunTs of COmPuTinG
  hORsePOwEr, oUR teChnology CaN bE easiLy anD QUICkly ScaLed tO even
  Greater levels Of sEcurITy tHrougH a varIety Of TechnIques iNcludInG,
  but not limited tO, masSive amounTs oF rE-enCrYptioN.

this soLveS noThing thAt propeRLy aPpLIED AeS does not already soLvE, WHiLe introdUcing aN AbSoLUtely unfAtHomAble AMOunt oF comPLeXity. If yoU're usiNG AeS, The weakNeSses in YoUr sYstEm wilL Not bE your cIpher. TheY will BE side channel atTAcks, nonce reusE (If APPlICablE), poOr random numBer gENeraTors, FIxEd IvS, lousY KDFs, WrONg MOdes of operation, lack Of AuthenTicatIon, and plenty oF other commON VUlnerabiLitiES, aLL of which would aPply aNyway in thiS Scheme.  FuRtherMore,  I shuDder to thiNK Of the perForManCe oF a sYSTeM that re-encrypTS ThouSaNds upon ThoUsands oF tiMes WitH muLtIple cipheRs. 
In summArY, tHiS sCheMe is uNNecessarY aNd tHe PapEr misLEading (And thAt's bEiNg CHarItable). 

 Q:

wHy DON't meMbRaNe prOteInS move?

i undERstAnd that Based on thEir TErtiArY sTructurE, intrinsic proTeIns have hydRoPhoBic non-POLar R-grouPs on their surface and that THey 'inteRacT with The hYdrophobiC coRe of thE ceLL membrAne to kEep thEm In pLACe'. 
But HOW dOes ThE hydrophobICIty Of botH tHe prOtein anD the cell membrane prEVenT the protein frOm mOvinG?

a:

prOteINs CAn mOvE AroUND the membrane.
MosT proteins dO mOVe Within the mEMbrAnE. The memBrane is A liquID crystaL and has flUid behaviOuR. SpeCIFicAlly, this is Due to the Membrane bEIng in A GeL-statE. ThIs gel sTaTe aLlows Phase bEHavIour wHich meAnS that tHe proTeIn is able To move around on the surfacE. This rEsultS in An effect tHat IS ofTen referrEd to As the fluid MosAic Model.
.
After totally ignoring t he role of  theIVasme ntio nedabove, they go on t o suggest something abit a bs u rd:As  a fu rther p r ot e c tio n,  i t i sa ls o pos sib le to u se differe nt encryption a l go rithms for  ea ch segment o f d ata to  b e s e cured . For
 examp l e, seg ment A co ul d  use A E S-256,s e gm entB could use Blowf i sh , 
  segment C c ould u se  3 D E S,etc .  In fact ,eachs egmento fd a t a c o uld
  then be  further re - enc rypted  d oze n s, hun dreds ,o r e ven thousan ds o f
  times .  Thi s  is one of thecharac ter ist icst ha tmak es Cip h er Loc ’ s
 technol og yveryscal a b l e .  A s h acke rs ge t more sophis tic ated and 
  co ntinu e to  h ave a ccessto ev er -increasing amo unts  of compu tin g  h or sepow e r, our  te chn ology c an be e a sil ya n d  q uickly scaled to e ve n  greaterlevels of  s e curity t hr oug h av a riety  oft ec hniquesinclud i ng ,  but n ot  limit ed  to , m assiv e  amo unts o f re-enc rypti o n.

This solve s  nothing that pr o p er l y ap pli ed AES does  not alre adys ol ve, while  intr od u ci n g an absolutely unf at homabl e amo unt of comple xity. If y o u ' re using  AES ,  t h e weaknesses i n you r system w i ll not b e you r cipher . They wi l l  be side  ch ann elatt a c ks , nonce reuse ( if a pp licable ),poor ra ndo m n umb erge nerators,  fixed I Vs ,lo us y K DFs,w rong mod es  of  o per ation ,  lackof au then ti ca t ion , and p l en t y  ofot he r co mmo nvulne rabi l iti es, all  of which  wo u ld a pp ly  anyway  in this sche me .  Further mo re,   I sh u d der to t hink of the performance of a sy ste m tha t re -encrypts  th ousand s u p on tho usands  of t im esw i th mu l t ip leci phers. 
In s umm ary,th is s cheme i s unnecessary andt hepaper mislead ing  (an d th at' s  b e ing  c h ari t a ble). 

 Q:

Wh y don't me mb r an e proteins mov e? 

I und erstand  that based o n their t ertiary s tr uctu r e , i ntrinsic p roteinshave hydr o phobi c  n on-po lar  R-gro up s o n the ir sur f ace  andthat t he y 'int eract  w ith thehydrophobic core of the  cellmembr ane  to keepthe m  in  place'.
But  how doesthe  hy droph obi c ity o f bo t hthe prote in a n d the cel l  m emb r a ne  prevent th e p rot ein f rom moving ?

A :

Proteins can m o ve around thememb r a ne. 
Mo s t pr ot eins do move w ith in t he membr an e. The memb rane isal iquid  cryst al and  has fl u i db ehavio ur.Spe cifically , t hi s  is due  t ot he mem bran ebeingin a g e l-st a t e. This gel stat e all o w s pha s e b ehavi ou r which mean s that the  protein is  ableto m ove a round o nthe su rfa ce . This res u lts in an  effe ct that  i s of ten  refer redt o  as t he f lu idmosaic mo d e l. 
.
After totally_ignoring the_role of the IV_as mentioned_above,_they go_on_to suggest something_a bit absurd:

As_a further protection, it_is also possible_to_use different
  encryption algorithms for each segment of data to be secured. _For
_ example,_segment_A_could use AES-256, segment B_could use Blowfish,
  segment_C could_use  3DES, etc.  In fact, each_segment_of data could
_ then be further re-encrypted dozens, hundreds, or even_thousands of
  times.  This_is one of_the_characteristics_that makes CipherLoc’s
 _technology very scalable.  As hackers_get more sophisticated and
  continue_to have access to ever-increasing amounts of_computing
  horsepower, our technology can_be easily and quickly scaled_to even
_ greater levels of security_through a variety_of techniques_including,
  but_not limited to, massive amounts of_re-encryption.

This solves nothing_that properly applied AES does not_already_solve, while introducing_an_absolutely_unfathomable amount_of complexity. If_you're_using AES,_the_weaknesses in your system will not_be_your cipher. They will be side channel_attacks, nonce reuse (if_applicable),_poor random number generators,_fixed IVs, lousy KDFs, wrong_modes of operation, lack of authentication,_and plenty_of other_common vulnerabilities, all of which would apply anyway in this scheme._ Furthermore,  I shudder to_think of the performance_of a_system_that re-encrypts thousands_upon_thousands of_times with multiple ciphers. 
In summary, this_scheme is_unnecessary and the paper misleading (and_that's being charitable). 

_Q:

Why_don't membrane proteins move?

I understand that_based on their tertiary structure, intrinsic_proteins have hydrophobic non-polar R-groups_on_their_surface and that they 'interact_with the hydrophobic core of the_cell membrane to_keep them in place'. 
But how does_the_hydrophobicity of both the protein and_the_cell membrane prevent the protein from_moving?

A:

Proteins_can_move around the membrane.
Most proteins_do move within the membrane. The_membrane is a liquid crystal and has fluid behaviour._Specifically, this is_due to the membrane being_in_a_gel-state. This gel state allows phase behaviour which means that_the protein_is able to_move around on the surface. This results in an effect_that is often referred to as the_fluid mosaic model.