 for human eyes) show the direction of polarization as banded patterns visible on the sky. Humans can see polarized light but we aren't that sensitive to it and can't use it to navigate like other animals can.
My question is this, given that these polarization patterns appear to be visible on the sky, would a sapient animal (that can therefore communicate what it sees) with the ability to see polarized light be able to identify the general orientation that a photograph or video had been taken from based on polarization patterns in the sky in the background? Or do most cameras not record that kind of information since the information being captured is intended for the human eye, which is more or less insensitive to polarized light?
EDIT: As a clarification, what I mean is would an alien sensitive towards polarized light be able to determine the direction at which a photograph or video was taken based on a photograph taken on a camera built by and for humans (i.e., cameras seen in everyday life), rather than a special camera built by the aliens specifically to take pictures/video accurate to their polarization-sensitive vision

A:

Humans and other people who cannot see polarization make and use cameras that do not record polarization. When cephalopods and other people who naturally see polarization use human cameras, they cannot see polarization in the photographs because human cameras do not record it. 
Cephalopods have a word, "isogris", analogous to the human's "monochrome", to describe such limited photos. 
Cephalopods are inspired to invent and produce cameras that capture and reproduce the polarization present when the photos are taken. Their finished developed photos emit polarized light. These photos look more natural to cephalopods, in the same way that color photos look more natural to humans. 
Humans using such cameras are not aware of the polarization emitted by the resultant photos. 
Humans who want to record polarization invent and produce cameras that capture polarization and record it as color or brightness, the way human monochrome cameras record colors as shades of gray. This is accomplished by adding a polarizing filter over the lens. 
Humans using such cameras see a representation of the polarization, usually as varying color saturation. 
There is no serious market among cephalopods for the inferior isogris human cameras. 

A:

You can test this for yourself by looking at a normal photograph through a polarising filter and rotating the filter. Unfortunately, I'm certain you'll find this has no
for human eyes) show the direction of polarization as banded design visible on the sky. world can see polarized light but we aren't that sensitive to it and can't practice it to navigate like other animals can. 
 My doubt is this, given that these polarization patterns look to be visible on the sky, would a sapient animal (that can consequently communicate what it sees) with the ability to experience polarized light be able to identify the general predilection that a photograph or video had been taken from based on polarization patterns in the sky in the background? Or do most camera not record that kind of information since the information being capture is intended for the human eye, which is more or less insensitive to polarized light? 
 EDIT: As a clearing, what I mean is would an alien sensible towards polarized light be able to determine the direction at which a photograph or video was consume based on a photograph taken on a camera built by and for humans (i.e., camera seen in everyday life), rather than a special camera built by the aliens specifically to take pictures / video recording accurate to their polarization - sensitive vision 

 deoxyadenosine monophosphate: 

 homo and other people who cannot determine polarization make and use cameras that do not record polarization. When cephalopod and other people who naturally see polarization use human cameras, they cannot see polarization in the photographs because human cameras do not record it. 
 Cephalopods have a word, " isogris ", analogous to the homo's " monochrome ", to report such limited photos. 
 Cephalopods are inspired to invent and grow cameras that capture and reproduce the polarization present when the photograph are taken. Their finished evolve photos emit polarize light. These photos search more natural to cephalopod, in the same way that color photos attend more natural to humans. 
 homo using such television camera are not aware of the polarization emitted by the resultant photos. 
 Humans who want to record polarization invent and produce cameras that get polarization and record it as color or luminosity, the way human monochrome cameras record colors as shades of gray. This is achieve by adding a polarizing filter over the lens. 
 Humans using such cameras see a representation of the polarization, normally as varying color impregnation. 
 There exist no serious market among cephalopods for the inferior isogris human cameras. 

 angstrom: 

 You can test this for yourself by looking at a normal photograph through a polarising filter and rotating the filter. Unfortunately, I'm sealed you'll find this have no
 fog human eyes) show the divection of polarnzation as bahded patgerns visible on the sky. Humens xan stv polarized light but we aren't that sebsitmve to it and cai'f use ib to hwvigctx like other anlmals can.
My question is tvir, yiven that these polarization pattergs appesr to be visible on uhe sky, would a sapient animal (that can tgerefort communicate what it sees) with the ability ho sfe polarized light be able to idegrify the gendral orienuacion that a photograph or video had been txken yrom based in popdrization petternf in the sky in the tackgroind? Or do most cakerqs not record that kiid of information sigce the itfkrmation being captyred hs ittenawd wor tie guman fye, which is jore or lesw insensitive to pokawpaed light?
EDIF: As a cjarification, what I mean is would an alpen aensitive towards polaruzed light be able to determinq the direction at which a photograph or video wav takxn baweq in a photograph taken on a camera built by and skr hlmans (i.e., cameras feen in evetyfau life), rather jhan a spedial camera built hy the wlienw specifisallu to take pictures/video accyrate to thepr pilarization-sensitire vision

A:

Huoans and pther people who cannot see polarizatiln make aha use cameras thxt co not record polarization. Wren cephaoopobs and ogher peoplq who natugally see polarization ude hulat cameras, hhey cannot see polarization in the photograpns bebause humcn camcras do not recjrd it. 
Cephalokods have a wofd, "isogris", analogmus to the ruman's "monochslme", to descrmbe such jimired photos. 
Zdphalopods are inspired to invent and produce cameres tfzt capture and xtpriduce the polarozagiog irexegd when the pvotor afr takdn. Their fikisfed ceveloped photos emid pomarized light. Thesr ihotos loik more gatural to celhalopods, in the swme wey thav colot protos look more natural to humzns. 
Humand ufing such caieraw are not awcre of the polarization emitted by the rxsultant photos. 
Humans qho want to record kolsrization iivent wnd produwe cameras that captyre polarization snd record it as colod or bsightjess, the way human monochrome cameras record colors as shades of gray. Thiw is arcjmplished bg adcing d 'olcrizing filvec over the lens. 
Hlmans using such cameras see a rxpresentathou of the polarization, usually ar varying colur saturation. 
There is nk serioux market among cephalopods for yhe inferior isogris humsn camerqs. 

A:

Yku can tesv this for yourself ny looning qt a noemal photograph tfroigm a polariding fnlter and rotating the filter. Unfirtunarepy, I'm certain yon'll find thid has ho
for human eyes) show the direction of banded visible on sky. Humans can aren't sensitive to it can't use it navigate like other animals can. My is this, given that these polarization patterns appear to be visible on the would a sapient animal (that can therefore communicate what it sees) with the to polarized be to identify the general orientation that a photograph or video had been taken from based on patterns in the sky in the background? Or most cameras not record kind of information since the being is intended the eye, is more or insensitive to polarized light? EDIT: As a clarification, what I mean is would an alien sensitive towards light be determine the at a or video was on a photograph taken on a and for humans (i.e., cameras seen in everyday rather than special camera built by the aliens to take pictures/video accurate to their polarization-sensitive vision Humans and other people who cannot see polarization make and use cameras that do not When cephalopods and other who naturally see use cameras, cannot polarization in photographs because human cameras do not record it. Cephalopods have a "isogris", analogous to the human's "monochrome", to describe such limited are to invent and cameras that capture and the present when the photos Their developed light. photos more natural to cephalopods, the same way that color look more natural to are not aware of the polarization emitted by resultant photos. Humans who want to record invent and produce cameras that capture polarization and record it as color brightness, the monochrome cameras record colors as shades of gray. is accomplished by adding polarizing filter over the lens. Humans using such cameras a of the usually as varying saturation. There is serious market among the inferior human A: this for yourself by looking at normal through a polarising filter and the I'm certain you'll find this has no
 for human eyes) show the directIon of polarIzatiOn aS baNdEd paTterNs visible on the SKy. HuMans can see polarized ligHt but We ARen't THaT sensItive to IT aND Can'T uSe It tO nAViGate lIke Other anImals can.
My QueStIon is this, givEN tHat these poLarIzation patteRns Appear To Be vISible On tHe sky, Would a SApient Animal (thaT cAN thereFOre commUNIcAte wHat it sees) with the aBIlITy to see polarizEd lighT bE AbLE To iDenTify the genErAl oriENtation THaT A PHotOGraph or video hAd been taken FRom Based oN pOlaRIzatioN pattErNS in The sky in the BackGround? Or dO most cAMeras noT Record tHat kinD of InfOrmaTIoN sIncE tHE inFOrMatIOn bEing captUrEd Is intEndeD FOR The hUmaN eye, Which Is more or less iNseNsitIVe tO polaRized LighT?
EdIT: As A clariFicatIoN, what I mean is wouLd an Alien sensItiVe TowArDs polARized lIghT be Able to dEterminE The DiRECTiOn at which a photograPh OR ViDeo was taKen basED oN a PHotograpH tAkeN on a CAMera bUilt BY aNd for humAns (i.e., cAMeRaS seen in EvEryday LiFe), rAthEr thaN A speCial caMera builT by thE Aliens specificALly to take pictUReS/VIdEO accUraTe to their poLariZAtioN-senSItIve VIsion

a:

HumaNs ANd OTher people who cannot SeE polarIzatiOn make and use cAmeras that DO NOt record PolaRIzATion. When cephalOpods And other peOPle who naTuralLy see polArization USE human caMerAs, tHey CanNOT sEe polarizatioN IN the PhOtograpHs bEcause hUmaN caMerAs dO nOt record iT. 
CephaloPoDs HaVe A woRd, "isoGRis", analoGoUs tO tHe hUman's "MOnochrOme", to DescRiBe SUch Limited PHoTOS. 
CepHaLoPods Are InSpireD to iNVenT and proDuce camerAs tHAt caPtUrE and repRoduce the polaRiZation presEnT whEn the pHOTos are taKen. Their finished developED photos EmiT polaRizeD light. TheSe pHotos lOok MOre natUral to CephaLoPodS, IN the sAME wAy tHaT color photOS LooK more NaTuraL to humaNs. 
Humans using such cAMerAs are not aware Of tHe poLARiZatIOn EMitTeD By tHE Resultant photos. 
humans who wAnT To Record polaRIzaTiOn invenT and proDuce cAMeras thAt capture PolarizatIoN and RECorD it as color Or brightNess, the waY Human MOnOchroMe cAmeras ReCorD coloRs as shADes Of graY. This iS aCcomplIshed By Adding a pOlarizing filter over the lEns. 
HumAns usIng Such camerAs sEE a rEpresentaTion Of the polarIzaTioN, usuaLly AS varyIng cOLoR saTUratiOn. 
ThERe is no serIOuS maRKEt Among cephalOPODs fOr the InfERior isOgriS human cameras. 

A:

You CAn test this for yOursELF by LooKIng aT a Normal photograPh tHrOUGh a polarIsIng filter anD rotatinG tHE filtEr. UnfoRtunatEly, I'm ceRTAiN You'll fInd tHis Has no
 for human eyes) show thedirectionof po lar iza ti on a s ba nded patternsv isib le on the sky. Humanscan s ee pola r iz ed li ght but we a ren 't  t hat  s e ns itive  to  it and  can't use  it  t o navigate l i ke  other ani mal s can.
My qu est ion is  t his ,  give n t hat t hese p o lariza tion patt er n s appe a r to be v is ible  on the sky, woul d  a sapient animal  (that  c a nt h ere for e communic at e wha t  it see s )w i t h t h e ability tosee polariz e d l ight b eabl e  to id entif yt hegeneral ori enta tion that  a pho t ographo r video  had b een  ta kenf ro mbas ed onp ol ari z ati on patte rn sin th e sk y i n  the  ba ckgr ound?  Or do most c ame rasn otrecor d tha t ki nd  of i nforma tionsi nce the informa tion  being ca ptu re d i sinten d ed for  th e h uman ey e, whic h  is  m o r e  o r less insensitive  t o po larizedlight? ED IT :  As a cl ar ifi cati o n , wha t Im ea n is wou ld ana li en  sensit iv e towa rd s p ola rized ligh t be a ble to d eterm i ne the directi o n at which ap ho t o gr a ph o r v ideo was ta kenb ased  ona  p hot o graph  take no na  camera built by an dfor hu mans(i.e., camera s seen ine v e ryday li fe), ra t her than a spe cialcamera bui l t by the  alie ns speci fically t o take pic tur es/ vid eoa c cu rate to their p olar iz ation-s ens itive v isi on
A: 

H um ans and o ther peo pl ewh ocan not s e e polari za tio nmak e and use ca meras  tha tdo not  record po l a riza ti on . Wh ence phalo pods and  otherpeople wh o n a tura ll ysee pol arization use  h uman camer as , t hey ca n n ot see p olarization in the phot o graphsbec ausehuma n cameras  do  not r eco r d it.
Cepha lopod shav e a wor d ,  " iso gr is", analo g o usto th ehuma n's "mo nochrome", to desc r ibe  such limited  ph otos . 
C eph a lo p ods  a r e i n s pired to invent  and produ ce ca meras that cap tu re andreprodu ce th e  polari zation pr esent whe nthep h oto s are take n. Their  finished devel o pe d pho tos  emitpo lar izedlight. The se ph otos l oo k more  natu ra l to cep halopods, in the same w ay tha t col orphotos lo okm ore  naturalto h umans. 
Hu man s u singsuc h  came rasa re  no t  awar e of the polar i za tio n em itted by th e r esu ltant  ph o tos. Huma ns who want to re c ord polarizati on i n v ent  an d  pro du ce cameras tha t c ap t u re polar iz ation and r ecord it  a s  colo r or b rightn ess, th e wa y  human  mon och rome came ras  r e cord co lo rs as sha desof  gray.  Thisi s ac c o mplished by addi ng ap o lariz i ngfilte rover th e  len s. 
Humans  using such  camer as s ee areprese nt ationofth e polariza t ion, usua lly a s varyi ng  col orsatura tion . 
Ther e is  n o s erious ma r k et am on g  ce phal opods  f or t he inferi o r isogri s h u man cam er as. 
A:

Y o uc a n test thi s f or yo u r self by lo o king at a nor mal ph otogra ph thro u ghapolaris ing f ilter and  rotating the  f ilte r. Unfor tu nate ly , I 'm  certain you'll  find th is has n o 
 for_human eyes)_show the direction of_polarization as_banded_patterns visible_on_the sky. Humans_can see polarized_light but we aren't_that sensitive to_it_and can't use it to navigate like other animals can.
My question is this, given_that_these polarization_patterns_appear_to be visible on the_sky, would a sapient animal_(that can_therefore communicate what it sees) with the ability_to_see polarized light_be able to identify the general orientation that a_photograph or video had been taken_from based on_polarization_patterns_in the sky in_the background? Or do most cameras_not record that kind of information_since the information being captured is intended_for the human eye, which is_more or less insensitive to_polarized light?
EDIT:_As a clarification, what I_mean is would_an alien_sensitive towards polarized_light be able to determine the_direction at which_a photograph or video was taken_based_on a photograph_taken_on_a camera_built by and_for_humans (i.e.,_cameras_seen in everyday life), rather than_a_special camera built by the aliens specifically_to take pictures/video accurate_to_their polarization-sensitive vision

A:

Humans and_other people who cannot see_polarization make and use cameras that_do not_record polarization._When cephalopods and other people who naturally see polarization use human_cameras, they cannot see polarization in_the photographs because human_cameras do_not_record it. 
Cephalopods_have_a word,_"isogris", analogous to the human's "monochrome", to_describe such_limited photos. 
Cephalopods are inspired to_invent and produce cameras_that_capture and reproduce the polarization present_when the photos are taken. Their_finished developed photos emit polarized_light._These_photos look more natural to_cephalopods, in the same way that_color photos look_more natural to humans. 
Humans using such_cameras_are not aware of the polarization_emitted_by the resultant photos. 
Humans who_want_to_record polarization invent and produce_cameras that capture polarization and record_it as color or brightness, the way human monochrome_cameras record colors_as shades of gray. This_is_accomplished_by adding a polarizing filter over the lens. 
Humans using_such cameras_see a representation_of the polarization, usually as varying color saturation. 
There is_no serious market among cephalopods for the_inferior isogris human cameras. 

A:

You can test this for yourself by_looking at a normal photograph through a polarising_filter and rotating the filter. Unfortunately, I'm_certain you'll find this_has_no