 the other answers "white" nobody got it "wrong" despite their answers being literal opposites of each other. But if someone asks "what color paper should my resume be printed on" then the two answers aren't equally "correct", even though there's no technical standard or regulation telling you what color paper should be using.

A:

As I would imagine, there should be general guidelines and example as to what is a good or bad answer, but the help and the FAQ are very relaxed on posting advices as answers.

I think that cuts to the heart of the matter, and I think there's a good reason why the help and FAQ are structured that way. Ultimately, you posted a two part question:

So there is two components to this question:

Do you believe the posting policy are adequate to meet our quality standards?
If not, is there any specific policy that could help getting less salty and opinion-based answers?

I think you left off the zero-th component, which is do we agree on what the quality standards are?
Our site tour gives the follow description of the purpose of our site:

The Workplace Stack Exchange is a question and answer site about the workplace and other career-related topics. It is for members of the workforce to get answers on topics such as the job hunting process, interviewing, salary negotiation, and professionalism within the Workplace. 

The challenge here is, many workplace "questions" on these topics are inherently subjective - or, at least, they don't inherently have a single, knowable, provable answer. So, we need to be careful when talking about quality standards, to ensure that we don't choke the site out of existence in the name of enforcing strict standards.
If I go on a technical SE site and ask about database indexes or some coding bug, there isn't really much room for subjectivity. It's easy to have objective quality standards, and it's often easy to trivially prove an answer is correct (by trying it out). A workplace question is rarely that black and white. If someone asks about including something on their resume, you can't go run off to a test environment, put it on your resume, run a unit test, and see if the answer was right or not. 
So in the absence of strict "quality" standards, or strict guidelines on objective answers, we are in a position where we have a gray area around interpreting answers. Luckily
the other answers " white " nobody got it " amiss " despite their answer being literal opposites of each other. But if someone ask " what color paper should my curriculum vitae be print on " then the two answers aren't evenly " right ", even though there's no technical standard or regulation order you what color paper should be using. 

 adenine: 

 As I would imagine, there should be cosmopolitan guidelines and case as to what is a full or bad answer, but the help and the FAQ are very relaxed on station advices as answers. 

 I think that cuts to the center of the matter, and I think there's a good reason why the help and FAQ are structure that way. Ultimately, you posted a two part question: 

 So there is two component to this question: 

 Do you believe the posting policy are adequate to meet our quality standards? 
 If not, is there any specific policy that could help getting less salty and opinion - establish answers? 

 I think you leave off the zero - thursday component, which is do we agree on what the quality criterion are? 
 Our web site tour gives the follow description of the purpose of our web site: 

 The Workplace Stack Exchange is a question and answer site about the workplace and other career - related topics. It is for extremity of the workforce to get answers on topics such as the job hunting procedure, interviewing, salary negotiation, and professionalism within the Workplace. 

 The challenge here is, many workplace " questions " on these topics are inherently subjective - or, at least, they don't inherently accept a single, knowable, provable answer. therefore, we need to be careful when talking about quality standards, to see that we don't choke the web site out of existence in the name of enforcing strict standards. 
 If I go on a technical SE web site and ask about database indexes or some coding bug, there ben't really much room for subjectivity. It's easy to have objective quality standards, and it's much easy to trivially prove an answer is correct (by trying it out). A workplace question is rarely that black and white. If someone asks about include something on their resume, you can't go ladder off to a test environment, put it on your curriculum vitae, run a unit test, and visit if the answer was right or not. 
 So in the absence of strict " quality " standards, or rigorous guidepost on objective answer, we are in a position where we have a gray area around interpreting answers. fortunately
 thf other answers "white" nonody got it "wrony" despive theid answerr being literal opposites of eqch ouker. But if someone arks "what bolor papwr siould my resume us printcb on" fmen tke two answers aten't equally "correct", even dhuuyh there's no technical standard or rqgulatipn telling you wrat bojor laper should be using.

A:

As I would ijagine, uhere should be gemeral guidelines and examppe ad to what is a goof or bad anwwer, vut the help and the FAQ are very telaxed on posting advices as anrwers.

N think thaj duhv to the heert of the matter, and I thhnk thete's a good reaxon wht the help and FAQ arx structured that wai. Ultimateny, you posted a two pqrt qoestimn:

So rhefe js tso comoonxnts to thia question:

Di you believe the ppsepmg policy ars adeqtaee to meet our quality standards?
If not, ps tgere any specific polict that could help getjing less falty and opinion-based answers?

I think you left ofx the xeri-tm coopojent, which is do we agree on what the quality atsncards are?
Our slte tour gives the fllkjw descriptiov of tks lurpose of our sitf:

The Wotkplacw Stack Evchamge is a question and answee site about rhe workplace and lther careex-relatgd topocs. It is for members oy the sorkforce tl get anssdrs on topics suzh ss the job hunting process, igterviewiig, sakary neeotistion, wnd profesdionalism within the Wornplacg. 

The whallenge jere is, many workplace "questions" on these topocv age inhereutly smbjective - or, ae least, they dpn't inhzrentlh have a spngle, knoxable, provabje answer. So, fg need to be rareful wren ralkung abojg quality stancards, to vnfure that we don't chokc the aite out of exiwtebce in the name of ensogciig stwhct standardv.
If K gu on a technical WD siye and ask about datdbass indexes or some voqing bug, there ifn't really muvh room for subjecuivity. It'r easu tj have objective quality standzrds, and lt's often easy eo tviviwlly prove an answer is correct (by trying it out). E workplace question is rarely that black cnc white. If xomeoge asks atout including sometying on their resmme, you can't go run ofr to a test environment, put it on your resume, run a unit test, and see if the answer qas rijhe or not. 
So in yhe atszncz of stwict "duality" standardx, or strict guidelines on objecvive answess, we are in a position where ee have a gray xrea around interpreting answers. Luckily
the other answers "white" nobody got it their being literal of each other. color should my resume printed on" then two answers aren't equally "correct", even there's no technical standard or regulation telling you what color paper should be A: As I would imagine, there should be general guidelines and example as what a or answer, but the help and the FAQ are very relaxed on posting advices as answers. I that cuts to the heart of the matter, I think there's a reason why the help and are that way. you a part question: So is two components to this question: Do you believe the posting policy are adequate to meet our standards? If there any policy could getting less salty answers? I think you left off which is do we agree on what the standards are? site tour gives the follow description the purpose of our site: The Workplace Stack is a question and answer site about the workplace and other career-related topics. It is of the workforce to answers on topics as job process, salary negotiation, professionalism within the Workplace. The challenge here is, many workplace "questions" these topics are inherently subjective - or, at least, they have single, knowable, provable So, we need to careful talking about quality standards, that don't out existence the name of enforcing standards. If I go on technical SE site and some coding bug, there isn't really much room subjectivity. It's easy to have objective quality and it's often easy to trivially prove an answer is correct (by it out). question is rarely that black and white. If asks about including something their resume, you can't go run off to a environment, it on resume, run a test, and see the answer was not. So the of or strict guidelines on objective answers, are a position where we have gray interpreting answers. Luckily
 the other answers "white" nobodY got it "wronG" despIte TheIr AnswErs bEing literal oppOSiteS of each other. But if someoNe askS "wHAt coLOr Paper Should mY ReSUMe bE pRiNteD oN" ThEn the Two Answers Aren't equalLy "cOrRect", even thouGH tHere's no tecHniCal standard oR reGulatiOn TelLIng yoU whAt colOr papeR Should Be using.

A:

AS I WOuld imAGine, theRE ShOuld Be general guidelinES aND example as to whAt is a gOoD Or BAD anSweR, but the helP aNd the faQ are veRY rELAXed ON posting advicEs as answers.

i ThiNk that CuTs tO The heaRt of tHe MAttEr, and I think TherE's a good reAson whY The help ANd FAQ arE strucTurEd tHat wAY. ULtImaTeLY, yoU PoSteD A twO part queStIoN:

So thEre iS TWO CompOneNts tO this Question:

Do you BelIeve THe pOstinG poliCy arE aDequaTe to meEt our QuAlity standards?
IF not, Is there anY spEcIfiC pOlicy THat couLd hElp Getting Less salTY anD oPINIoN-based answers?

I thinK yOU LeFt off the Zero-th COmPoNEnt, which Is Do wE agrEE On whaT the QUaLity stanDards aRE?
OUr Site touR gIves thE fOllOw dEscriPTion Of the pUrpose of Our siTE:

The Workplace STAck Exchange is A QuESTiON and AnsWer site abouT the WOrkpLace ANd OthER careEr-relAtED tOPics. It is for members oF tHe workForce To get answers oN topics sucH AS The job huNtinG PrOCess, interviewiNg, salAry negotiaTIon, and prOfessIonalism Within the wORkplace. 

THe cHalLenGe hERE iS, many workplacE "QUestIoNs" on theSe tOpics arE inHerEntLy sUbJective - or, At least, tHeY dOn'T iNheRentlY Have a sinGlE, knOwAblE, provABle ansWer. So, We neEd To BE caReful whEN tALKing AbOuT quaLitY sTandaRds, tO EnsUre that We don't choKe tHE sitE oUt Of existEnce in the name Of Enforcing sTrIct StandaRDS.
If I go on A technical SE site and ask aBOut dataBasE indeXes oR some codiNg bUg, therE isN'T reallY much rOom foR sUbjECTivitY. iT's EasY tO have objecTIVe qUalitY sTandArds, and It's often easy to trivIAllY prove an answeR is CorrECT (bY trYInG It oUt). a WorKPLace question is rArely that bLaCK aNd white. If sOMeoNe Asks aboUt incluDing sOMething On their reSume, you caN't Go ruN OFf tO a test enviRonment, pUt it on youR ResumE, RuN a uniT teSt, and sEe If tHe ansWer was RIghT or noT. 
So in tHe AbsencE of stRiCt "qualitY" standards, or strict guideLines oN objeCtiVe answers, We aRE in A position WherE we have a grAy aRea ArounD inTErpreTing ANsWerS. luckiLy
 the other answers "white"  nobody go t it"wr ong "desp itetheir answersb eing  literal opposites ofeachot h er.B ut  if s omeonea sk s "wh at  c olo rp ap er sh oul d my re sume be pr int ed  on" then th e  t wo answers  ar en't equally  "c orrect ",  ev e n tho ugh  ther e's no techni cal stand ar d  or re g ulation t el ling  you what color p a pe r  should be usi ng.

A :As I  wo uld  imagine,th ere s h ould be ge n e r alg uidelines and  example as towhat i sa g o od orbad a ns w er,  but the he lp a nd the FA Q arev ery rel a xed onpostin g a dvi cesa san swe rs . 

I th ink tha t cuts t oth e hea rt o f t h e ma tte r, a nd Ithink there's  agood rea son w hy th e he lp  andFAQ ar e str uc tured that way.  Ult imately,you  p ost ed  a tw o  partque sti on:

So  therei s t wo c o mp onents to this que st i o n: 

Do you  belie v eth e  posting  p oli cy a r e  adeq uate to  meet ou r qual i ty  s tandard s? 
If no t,  is  th ere a n y sp ecific  policythatc ould help gett i ng less salty an d op i nion -ba sed answers ?

I thin k yo u  l eft off t he ze ro - th component, which is  d o we a greeon what the q uality sta n d a rds are? 
Our si t e tour gives t he fo llow descr i ption of  thepurposeof our si t e :

The W ork pla ceSta c k  E xchange is aq u esti on  and an swe r siteabo utthe  wo rk place and  other c ar ee r- re lat ed to p ics. Itis  fo rmem berso f theworkf orce  t og etanswers on t opic ssu ch a s t he  jobhunt i ngprocess , intervi ewi n g, s al ar y negot iation, and p ro fessionali sm  wi thin t h e  Workpla ce. 

The challenge her e  is, ma nyworkp lace  "questio ns"  on th ese topics  are i nhere nt lys u bject i v e- o r,  at least, t hey  don' tinhe rentlyhave a single, kno w abl e, provable a nsw er.S o ,wen ee d  to  b e  ca r e ful when talkin g about qu al i ty  standards ,  to  e nsure t hat wedon't choke t he site o ut of exi st ence i n t he name of  enforci ng strict stand a rd s.
If  Igo onatec hnica l SE s i teand a sk abo ut  datab ase i nd exes orsome coding bug, thereisn'treall y m uch roomfor sub jectivity . It 's easy to  ha veobjec tiv e  qual itys ta nda r ds, a nd i t 's oftene as y t o tr ivially pro v e ananswe r i s  corre ct ( by trying it out) .  A workplace q uest i o n i s r a rely  t hat black andwhi te . If someo ne  asks about  includi ng somet hing o n thei r resum e ,  y o u can' t go  ru n off toa t es t  enviro nm en t , putit o nyour r esume, runa unit test, and s ee if t he an s wer  wasri ght orn ot.
So in the  absence of  stric t "q ualit y" stan da rds, o r s tr ict guidel i nes on ob jecti ve answ er s, w e a re ina po s i tionwher ewehave a gr a y  a r ea  a r oun d in terpr et inganswers.L uckily
 the_other answers_"white" nobody got it_"wrong" despite_their_answers being_literal_opposites of each_other. But if_someone asks "what color_paper should my_resume_be printed on" then the two answers aren't equally "correct", even though there's no_technical_standard or_regulation_telling_you what color paper should_be using.

A:

As I would imagine,_there should_be general guidelines and example as to what_is_a good or_bad answer, but the help and the FAQ are_very relaxed on posting advices as_answers.

I think that_cuts_to_the heart of the_matter, and I think there's a_good reason why the help and_FAQ are structured that way. Ultimately, you_posted a two part question:

So there_is two components to this_question:

Do you_believe the posting policy are_adequate to meet_our quality_standards?
If not, is_there any specific policy that could_help getting less_salty and opinion-based answers?

I think you_left_off the zero-th_component,_which_is do_we agree on_what_the quality_standards_are?
Our site tour gives the follow_description_of the purpose of our site:

The Workplace_Stack Exchange is a_question_and answer site about_the workplace and other career-related_topics. It is for members of_the workforce_to get_answers on topics such as the job hunting process, interviewing, salary_negotiation, and professionalism within the Workplace._

The challenge here is,_many workplace_"questions"_on these topics_are_inherently subjective_- or, at least, they don't inherently_have a_single, knowable, provable answer. So, we_need to be careful_when_talking about quality standards, to ensure_that we don't choke the site_out of existence in the_name_of_enforcing strict standards.
If I go_on a technical SE site and_ask about database_indexes or some coding bug, there isn't_really_much room for subjectivity. It's easy_to_have objective quality standards, and it's_often_easy_to trivially prove an answer_is correct (by trying it out)._A workplace question is rarely that black and white._If someone asks_about including something on their_resume,_you_can't go run off to a test environment, put it_on your_resume, run a_unit test, and see if the answer was right or_not. 
So in the absence of strict_"quality" standards, or strict guidelines on objective answers, we are in_a position where we have a gray area_around interpreting answers. Luckily