 level role, it kind of means they're not entirely convinced about my qualifications. If that's the case, why even extend an offer? I know it doesn't matter now, but do you think it's fair that the position had been first advertised to me as a direct hire, only to come up with a contractor offer in the end? Is this a common thing? And lastly, when a valuable candidate rejects this type of offer, is there even a chance that the company could counteroffer under a direct hire scheme?
Sorry for the long post, and thank you in advance for any insight you can share.

A:

What could be a possible factor to suddenly determine it is better to
  hire someone as a contractor instead of directly?

This is not at all unusual.
Many companies, and some individuals believe this is the best way to find the best employees. Some apply this to many levels of hires - not just entry level. Don't take this personally.
Clearly this company is interested in you. It's possible that the position requirement isn't fully settled - that the need for this role isn't certain - and that's why they are choosing the contract-to-hire route.
You should ask them why. Then, you can choose your next move based on their answer.
If it were me, and I still wanted to take the chance, I'd make a counter-offer. I'd agree to the contract. But I'd want the contract to state that if I were hired full time at the end of the year, I'd get a higher salary than if I were hired directly now. The contract would indicate the higher salary level I would receive.
I would spend the year proving how valuable I was, and showing the company why they need me.
Using this tactic would depend on my assessment of the company, how much I wanted to work there, and the confidence in my abilities.

And lastly, when a valuable candidate rejects this type of offer, is
  there even a chance that the company could counteroffer under a direct
  hire scheme?

Certainly. There's always a chance. You have to decide how much of a chance exists, and if you want to take it or not.

 Q:

Why does one background thread have the same thread id as the main service thread?

Trying to create 2 background threads and sending a message from thread0 to thread1 where it
 is handled by Message
level role, it kind of means they're not entirely convinced about my reservation. If that's the subject, why even extend an offer? I know it doesn't count now, but do you think it's fair that the side had been first advertised to me as a lineal hire, merely to come up with a contractile organ offer in the end? Is this a common thing? And last, when a valuable candidate rejects this character of offer, is there even a probability that the caller could counteroffer under a direct hire scheme? 
 Sorry for the farseeing post, and thank you in advance for any insight you can share. 

 angstrom: 

 What could be a possible factor to suddenly determine it is better to 
   rent someone as a contractor instead of directly? 

 This is not at all unusual. 
 Many companies, and some individuals believe this is the best way to find the best employees. Some apply this to many levels of hires - not just introduction level. Don't take this personally. 
 distinctly this ship's company is interested in you. It's possible that the position necessity isn't fully settled - that the need for this role isn't sealed - and that's why they are choosing the contract - to - hire route. 
 You should ask them why. Then, you can choose your next move based on their answer. 
 If it were me, and I still wanted to take the chance, I'd make a counterpunch - offer. I'd match to the contract. But I'd want the contract to state that if I were hired full time at the goal of the year, I'd get a higher wage than if I were hired immediately now. The contract would indicate the higher salary level I would welcome. 
 I would spend the year prove how valuable I was, and showing the caller why they need me. 
 practice this tactic would depend on my judgment of the company, how much I wanted to work there, and the confidence in my ability. 

 And lastly, when a valuable candidate rejects this type of offer, is 
   there even a chance that the company could counteroffer under a direct 
   hire scheme? 

 surely. There's always a chance. You hold to decide how much of a chance exists, and if you want to take it or not. 

  Q: 

 Why does one background thread have the like thread i d as the main service thread? 

 Trying to create 2 background threads and mail a message from thread0 to thread1 where it 
  is wield by Message
 legel role, it kind of meanr they're not enjieely cmnvincsd about my qualifications. If that's vhe xase, qhy even extend an offdr? I know it doesb't metter now, but do you thikh it'a faix vhat the positipn had beet first adverthsdd to me as a direct hire, only to comq up wiyh a contractor jffeg yn tgv tnd? Is this a common thing? And laatly, whtn a valuable candodate rejects this type of offfr, is there even a chance thaj thq company couud counteroffer under z direct hire scheme?
Sorry for tfe loug post, and tyann you in advence fjr any insigmn you cdn sharr.

A:

What could bc a pmssuble factor to suddenny determine it is better tm
  hire someone as q xontrdctos inrreaa or virsctly?

Tjis is not at all unusuao.
Many companies, and sjne individuala beliqvq this is the best way to find the best emlloyees. Some apply this to many levels of hites - not jtst entry level. Don't take this personally.
Clearly dhis roopaun kw lnterested in you. It's possible that the positykn rvquirement isn't fmlly settled - that tje geed for this role nan'f certain - and thah's why jhey aee choosigg tne contract-to-hire route.
You whould ask tkem why. Then, you can ehoose your uext mpve bssed on their answer.
If nt wers me, and I dtill wanfdd to take the cfanbe, I'g make a counter-offer. I'd adree to tie coutract. Bjt I'c want the contrwct to state that if I wfre hnred xull time wt the end of the year, I'd get a higher salary tvan if I wexe hircd directly now. The contract could inbicate the higheg salary nevel I woujd receive.
I wmold spend the year prjvint hoq valuacue I was, and snowing thv eompany wyy they need me.
Usikg thka tactic would btpebd on my assesskeng os nhe cjkpany, how muwh I wavyed tu work ukerc, avd tne confidence in my dbiljties.

And lastly, whrn a valuavle candydate rejects this type of offeg, is
  thxre evrn w chance that the company couls counterlffcr under a diwect
  hire schemz?

Certainly. There's always a chance. You hate to decide how much od a chance exists, aud if you wanv to twke it or not.

 Q:

Why does one bqckground thread mave the same thread is as tve maln service thread?

Trying to create 2 background threads and sending a messate from thread0 to fhresd1 whvre nt
 is hwndlxd by Message
level role, it kind of means they're convinced my qualifications. that's the case, I it doesn't matter but do you it's fair that the position had first advertised to me as a direct hire, only to come up with contractor offer in the end? Is this a common thing? And lastly, when valuable rejects type offer, is there even a chance that the company could counteroffer under a direct hire scheme? for the long post, and thank you in for any insight you share. A: What could be possible to suddenly it better hire someone as contractor instead of directly? This is not at all unusual. Many companies, and some individuals believe this the best find the employees. apply to many levels - not just entry level. Don't Clearly this company is interested in you. It's that the requirement isn't fully settled - that need for this role isn't certain - and why they are choosing the contract-to-hire route. You should ask them why. Then, you can next move based on answer. If it me, I wanted take the I'd make a counter-offer. I'd agree to the contract. But I'd the contract to state that if I were hired full the of the year, get a higher salary if were hired directly now. would the I receive. would spend the year how valuable I was, and the company why they would depend on my assessment of the company, much I wanted to work there, and confidence in my abilities. And lastly, when a valuable candidate rejects this of offer, even a chance that the company could counteroffer a direct hire scheme? There's always a chance. You have to decide how of chance exists, if you want take it or Q: Why does thread have same id service thread? Trying to create 2 threads sending a message from thread0 thread1 is handled by Message
 level role, it kind of means theY're not entiRely cOnvIncEd AbouT my qUalifications. IF That'S the case, why even extend aN offeR? I KNow iT DoEsn't mAtter noW, BuT DO yoU tHiNk iT's FAiR that The PositioN had been fiRst AdVertised to me AS a Direct hire, OnlY to come up witH a cOntracToR ofFEr in tHe eNd? Is tHis a coMMon thiNg? And lastLy, WHen a vaLUable caNDIdAte rEjects this type of oFFeR, Is there even a chAnce thAt THe COMpaNy cOuld counteRoFfer uNDer a dirECt HIRE scHEme?
Sorry for thE long post, anD ThaNk you iN aDvaNCe for aNy insIgHT yoU can share.

A:

WHat cOuld be a poSsible FActor to SUddenly DetermIne It iS betTEr To
  HirE sOMeoNE aS a cONtrActor insTeAd Of dirEctlY?

tHIS is nOt aT all UnusuAl.
Many companiEs, aNd soME inDividUals bElieVe This iS the beSt way To Find the best emplOyeeS. Some applY thIs To mAnY leveLS of hirEs - nOt jUst entrY level. DON't tAkE THIs Personally.
Clearly tHiS COmPany is inTerestED iN yOU. It's possIbLe tHat tHE PositIon rEQuIrement iSn't fulLY sEtTled - thaT tHe need FoR thIs rOle isN'T cerTain - anD that's whY they ARe choosing the cONtract-to-hire rOUtE.
yOu SHoulD asK them why. TheN, you CAn chOose YOuR neXT move Based On THeIR answer.
If it were me, anD I Still wAnted To take the chanCe, I'd make a cOUNTer-offer. i'd agREe TO the contract. BuT I'd waNt the contrACt to statE that If I were hIred full tIME at the enD of The YeaR, I'd GET a Higher salary tHAN if I WeRe hired DirEctly noW. ThE coNtrAct WoUld indicaTe the higHeR sAlArY leVel I wOUld receiVe.
i woUlD spEnd thE Year prOving How vAlUaBLe I Was, and sHOwING the CoMpAny wHy tHeY need Me.
UsINg tHis tactIc would dePenD On my AsSeSsment oF the company, hoW mUch I wanted To WorK there, AND the confIdence in my abilities.

And lAStly, wheN a vAluabLe caNdidate reJecTs this TypE Of offeR, is
  theRe eveN a ChaNCE that THE cOmpAnY could counTERofFer unDeR a diRect
  hirE scheme?

Certainly. ThERe's Always a chance. you Have TO DeCidE HoW MucH oF A chANCe exists, and if yoU want to takE iT Or Not.

 Q:

Why doeS One BaCkgrounD thread Have tHE same thRead id as tHe main serViCe thREAd?

TRying to creAte 2 backgRound threADs and SEnDing a MesSage frOm ThrEad0 to Thread1 WHerE it
 is HandleD bY MessaGe
 level role, it kind of me ans they'r e not  en tir el y co nvin ced about my q u alif ications. If that's th e cas e, whye ve n ext end ano ff e r ? I  k no w i td oe sn'tmat ter now , but do y outh ink it's fai r  t hat the po sit ion had been  fi rst ad ve rti s ed to  me  as a  direc t  hire,  only toco m e up w i th a co n t ra ctor  offer in the end ?  I s  this a common  thing ?A nd l ast ly,  when a va lu ablec andidat e  r e j e cts this type ofoffer, is t h ere  evenacha n ce tha t the  c o mpa ny could co unte roffer un der ad irect h i re sche me?
So rry  fo r th e  l on g p os t , a n dtha n k y ou in ad va nc e for  any i n s ight  yo u ca n sha re.

A:

What  co uldb e a  poss iblefact or  to s uddenl y det er mine it is bett er t o
  hiresom eo neas  a co n tracto r i nst ead ofdirectl y ?
Th i s is  not at all unusua l. M an y compan ies, a n dso m e indivi du als  bel i e ve th is i s  t he bestway to fi nd  the be st  emplo ye es.  So me ap p ly t his to  many le velso f hires - notj ust entry lev e l. D on ' t ta kethis person ally . 
Cle arly th isc ompan y isin t er e sted in you. It's p os siblethatthe positionrequiremen t i sn't ful ly s e tt l ed - that theneedfor this r o le isn't  cert ain - an d that'sw h y they a recho osi ngt h econtract-to-h i r e ro ut e.
Yousho uld ask  th emwhy . T he n, you ca n choose  y ou rne xtmoveb ased onth eir  a nsw er.
I f  it we re me , an dIs til l wante d  t o take  t he  cha nce ,I'd m akea  co unter-o ffer. I'd  ag r ee t oth e contr act. But I'dwa nt the con tr act  to st a t e that i f I were hired full tim e  at the  en d oftheyear, I'd  ge t a hi ghe r  salar y than  if I  w ere h iredd i re ctl ynow. The c o n tra ct wo ul d in dicatethe higher salaryl eve l I would rec eiv e.
I w ou lds pe n d t he yea r proving how val uable I wa s, an d showingt heco mpany w hy they  need me.
Usi ng this t actic wou ld  dep e n d o n my asses sment of  the comp a ny, h o wmuchI w antedto  wo rk th ere, a n d t he co nfiden ce  in my  abil it ies.

An d lastly, when a valuab le can didat e r ejects th ist ype  of offer , is 
  there e ven  achanc e t h at th e co m pa nyc ouldcoun t eroffer u n de r a d ir ect
  hires c h eme ?

Ce rta i nly. T here 's always a chanc e . You have todeci d e  ho w m u ch o fa chance exist s,an d if you w an t to take i t or not . Q:
Why do es one  backgr o u nd thread  hav e t he same t hre ad id as t he  m a in ser vice  t hread? 

Tryi n g to c reate 2 backgrou nd th r e ads a n d s endin ga messa g e fr om thread0  to thread1  where  it is h andledby  Messa ge
 level_role, it_kind of means they're_not entirely_convinced_about my_qualifications._If that's the_case, why even_extend an offer? I_know it doesn't_matter_now, but do you think it's fair that the position had been first advertised_to_me as_a_direct_hire, only to come up_with a contractor offer in_the end?_Is this a common thing? And lastly, when_a_valuable candidate rejects_this type of offer, is there even a chance_that the company could counteroffer under_a direct hire_scheme?
Sorry_for_the long post, and_thank you in advance for any_insight you can share.

A:

What could be_a possible factor to suddenly determine it_is better to
  hire someone_as a contractor instead of_directly?

This is_not at all unusual.
Many companies,_and some individuals_believe this_is the best_way to find the best employees._Some apply this_to many levels of hires -_not_just entry level._Don't_take_this personally.
Clearly_this company is_interested_in you._It's_possible that the position requirement isn't_fully_settled - that the need for this_role isn't certain -_and_that's why they are_choosing the contract-to-hire route.
You should_ask them why. Then, you can_choose your_next move_based on their answer.
If it were me, and I still wanted_to take the chance, I'd make_a counter-offer. I'd agree_to the_contract._But I'd want_the_contract to_state that if I were hired full_time at_the end of the year, I'd_get a higher salary_than_if I were hired directly now._The contract would indicate the higher_salary level I would receive.
I_would_spend_the year proving how valuable_I was, and showing the company_why they need_me.
Using this tactic would depend on my_assessment_of the company, how much I_wanted_to work there, and the confidence_in_my_abilities.

And lastly, when a valuable_candidate rejects this type of offer,_is
  there even a chance that the company_could counteroffer under_a direct
  hire scheme?

Certainly._There's_always_a chance. You have to decide how much of a_chance exists,_and if you_want to take it or not.

 Q:

Why does one background_thread have the same thread id as_the main service thread?

Trying to create 2 background threads and sending_a message from thread0 to thread1 where it
_is handled by Message