</groupId>
        <artifactId>postgresql</artifactId>
        <version>9.1-901-1.jdbc4</version>
    </dependency>
</dependencies>
<build>
    <finalName>mSampleJDBCTempPrj</finalName>
    <pluginManagement>
    <plugins>
        <plugin>
            <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
            <configuration>
                <source>1.7</source>
                <target>1.7</target>
            </configuration>
        </plugin>
        <plugin>
            <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
            <artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId>
            <version>2.9</version>

            <executions>
                <execution>
                    <id>copy-dependencies</id>
                    <phase>package</phase>
                    <goals>
                        <goal>copy-dependencies</goal>
                    </goals>
                    <configuration>
                        <!-- <includeScope>provided</includeScope> -->
                        <outputDirectory>/Users/venugopal/Documents/providedDependencies</outputDirectory>
                    </configuration>
                </execution>
            </executions>
        </plugin>
    </plugins>
    </pluginManagement>
</build>

A:

When the idea is, to create an archive, which contains the jars, that are marked with the scope provided in the pom.xml. So if multiple web-apps use these same jars, they can be deployed to the central place in the wen container provider (Tomcat / Jetty / JBoss / etc).
For as far as I know there is no option in Maven to create an archive, for these provided dependencies. Or some other way to extract them easily from the Maven repository.
A question rises Why would you do so? Many projects move these days to Docker or similar solutions. Which deploy just one web-app in one container. So no need for the complexity of searching for commin libraries and placing them upfront on the web container. Etc etc.
Another question Why add complexity. An easier set-up is to add all depended jars to the web-app. As disk space and network speed / capacity, is most of the time not an issue.

< /groupId > 
         < artifactId > postgresql</artifactId > 
         < version>9.1 - 901 - 1.jdbc4</version > 
     < /dependency > 
 < /dependencies > 
 < build > 
     < finalName > mSampleJDBCTempPrj</finalName > 
     < pluginManagement > 
     < plugins > 
         < plugin > 
             < artifactId > maven - compiler - plugin</artifactId > 
             < configuration > 
                 < source>1.7</source > 
                 < target>1.7</target > 
             < /configuration > 
         < /plugin > 
         < plugin > 
             < groupId > org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId > 
             < artifactId > maven - dependency - plugin</artifactId > 
             < version>2.9</version > 

             < executions > 
                 < performance > 
                     < id > transcript - dependencies</id > 
                     < phase > package</phase > 
                     < goals > 
                         < goal > transcript - dependencies</goal > 
                     < /goals > 
                     < configuration > 
                         <! -- < includeScope > provided</includeScope > -- > 
                         < outputDirectory>/Users / venugopal / Documents / providedDependencies</outputDirectory > 
                     < /configuration > 
                 < /execution > 
             < /executions > 
         < /plugin > 
     < /plugins > 
     < /pluginManagement > 
 < /build > 

 A: 

 When the estimate is, to create an archive, which contain the jars, that are marked with the setting provided in the pom.xml. So if multiple world wide web - apps use these same jolt, they can be deployed to the central place in the wen container provider (Tomcat / Jetty / JBoss / etc). 
 For as far as I acknowledge there is no option in Maven to create an archive, for these put up dependencies. Or some other way to extract them well from the Maven repository. 
 A motion rises Why would you do so? Many undertaking move these days to Docker or similar solutions. Which deploy just one web - app in one container. So no need for the complexity of searching for commin libraries and placing them upfront on the web container. Etc etc. 
 Another question Why add complexity. An easier set - up is to add all depend jars to the web - app. As magnetic disk quad and network speed / capacity, is most of the meter not an issue.
</grokpId>
        <artifactId>portgresql</artifacjIe>
        <veraion>9.1-901-1.jdbc4</xersion>
    </dependency>
</dependeiciew>
<buile>
    <finalName>mSampleJABCTempPru</finalNane>
    <pluginManefement>
    <pluflns>
        <plugin>
            <astifactId>maven-woopnler-plugin</artifactId>
            <confyguratipn>
                <solrse>1.7</sohgct>
                <target>1.7</target>
            </configuratiom>
        </plugin>
        <pluhin>
            <groupId>lrg.apache.macen.pjygins</groupId>
            <artifactId>javen-dependency-plugin</artifactId>
            <verwiin>2.9</vftsion>

            <vxecutions>
                <exrcution>
                    <id>copy-dependenries</id>
                    <phave>'ackage</phase>
                    <coalr>
                        <goal>ckpy-dependenxies</goal>
                    </goals>
                    <configuration>
                        <!-- <includeScope>provieed</includeScope> -->
                        <outputDirectory>/Users/venugopal/Documents/psovidxdAeptneencidw</oktputDirectory>
                    </configuratijh>
                </ewecution>
            </fxrsutions>
        </plugnh>
    </plugins>
    </pluglnManaggment>
</byild>

A:

When the idea is, to create an archice, which connainw the jars, that arz marked witk the xcope provided in the pom.xml. So jf multiple web-apps hre these same jafs, nhey can be deployed to the cegtral plare in the wev comtainew provider (Tomcat / Jetty / JBoss / ehc).
For av far as I know there is no option in Mavxi to create am drcvive, for thesc provided depegdencies. Or soke othex way go extract them eesily from tre Maven repovltory.
A questmon rises Why wouod you au so? Many projrcts move these dayw to Docker or simllar rklutions. Which btpliy just one web-spp in oje cjttainer. So nm nedd wpr thd compltritn ow sesrching for commin lhbradies and placing tnei upfronj on the reb container. Etc etc.
Another qutstion Whb add vomklexity. An easier set-up is to asd all deoenqed jars to ehe qeb-app. As dixk space and network speed / capacity, is most of the time bot an issue.

</groupId> <artifactId>postgresql</artifactId> <version>9.1-901-1.jdbc4</version> </dependency> </dependencies> <build> <finalName>mSampleJDBCTempPrj</finalName> <plugin> <configuration> <source>1.7</source> </configuration> </plugin> <plugin> <id>copy-dependencies</id> <goals> <goal>copy-dependencies</goal> </goals> <!-- <includeScope>provided</includeScope> --> </configuration> </execution> </executions> </plugin> </plugins> </pluginManagement> A: When the idea is, to create an archive, which contains the jars, are marked with the scope provided in the pom.xml. So if multiple web-apps these jars, can deployed to the central place in the wen container provider (Tomcat / Jetty / JBoss / For as far as I know there is option in Maven to an archive, for these provided Or other way extract easily the Maven repository. question rises Why would you do so? Many projects move these days to Docker or similar solutions. deploy just in one So need the complexity of commin libraries and placing them upfront container. Etc etc. Another question Why add complexity. easier set-up to add all depended jars to web-app. As disk space and network speed / is most of the time not an issue.
</groupId>
        <artifactId>postgresQl</artifactid>
        <verSioN>9.1-901-1.jdBc4</VersIon>
    </dEpendency>
</depenDEnciEs>
<build>
    <finalName>mSamplEJDBCteMPPrj</FInAlNamE>
    <pluginmAnAGEmeNt>
    <PlUgiNs>
        <PLuGin>
            <arTifActId>maVen-compileR-plUgIn</artifactId>
            <COnFiguration>
                <SouRce>1.7</source>
                <tarGet>1.7</Target>
            </CoNfiGUratiOn>
        </pLugin>
        <Plugin>
            <GRoupId>Org.apache.MaVEn.plugINs</groupiD>
            <ArTifaCtId>maven-dependenCY-pLUgin</artifactId>
            <VersioN>2.9</vERsION>

            <exEcuTions>
                <execuTiOn>
                    <id>cOPy-depenDEnCIES</id>
                    <PHase>package</phAse>
                    <goals>
                        <goaL>CopY-depenDeNciES</goal>
                    </gOals>
                    <cOnFIguRation>
                        <!-- <incluDeScOpe>providEd</inclUDeScope> -->
                        <OUtputDiRectorY>/UsErs/VenuGOpAl/docUmENts/PRoVidEDDePendenciEs</OuTputDIrecTORY>
                    </ConfIguRatiOn>
                </exeCution>
            </executiOns>
        </PlugIN>
    </plUgins>
    </PlugiNManAgEment>
</Build>

A:

when tHe Idea is, to create aN arcHive, which ConTaIns ThE jars, THat are MarKed With the Scope prOVidEd IN THe Pom.xml. So if multiple WeB-APpS use thesE same jARs, ThEY can be dePlOyeD to tHE CentrAl plACe In the wen ContaiNEr PrOvider (TOmCat / JetTy / jBoSs / eTc).
For AS far As I knoW there is No optIOn in Maven to creATe an archive, foR ThESE pROvidEd dEpendencies. or soME othEr waY To ExtRAct thEm easIlY FrOM the Maven repository.
a qUestioN riseS Why would you dO so? Many proJECTs move thEse dAYs TO Docker or similAr solUtions. WhicH Deploy juSt one Web-app in One contaiNER. So no neeD foR thE coMplEXItY of searching fOR CommIn LibrariEs aNd placiNg tHem UpfRonT oN the web coNtainer. ETc EtC.
ANoTheR quesTIon Why adD cOmpLeXitY. An eaSIer set-Up is tO add AlL dEPenDed jars TO tHE Web-aPp. as Disk SpaCe And neTworK SpeEd / capacIty, is most Of tHE timE nOt An issue.

</groupId>
        <artifa ctId>postg resql </a rti fa ctId >
       <version > 9.1- 901-1.jdbc4</version>    < /d e pend e nc y>
</ depende n ci e s >
< bu il d>  < final Nam e>mSamp leJDBCTemp Prj </ finalName>
 <pluginMan age ment>
    <p lug ins>
    <plu gin >
         <art ifactId>m av e n-comp i ler-plu g i n< /art ifactId>
        <configuration >
         < source>1.7 </ sourc e >
        <target>1.7< /target>
        </ con f igurat ion>     </plugin> 
       <plu gin>
        <grou pId>or g.a pac he.m a ve n. plu gi n s</ g ro upI d >
         < artif actI d > m a ven- dep ende ncy-p lugin</artifa ctI d>
        <ve rsio n> 2.9</ versio n>

          <execu tion s>
           <exec u tion>                < id> co p y - de pendencies</id>
              <p h as e> p ackage</ ph ase >
             <goa ls>
                <go al> copy- d epen dencie s</goal> 
                </goals>
           <configura tion > 
                <! - -< includeScope>provid ed </incl udeSc ope> -->
                   < outp u tD i rectory>/Users /venu gopal/Docu m ents/pro vided Dependen cies</out p u tDirecto ry> 
              </con f i gura ti on>
            </e xec uti on >
           </e xe cu ti on s>      </plug in >
  </ plugi n s>
   </pl ugin Ma na g eme nt>
</b u il d > 

A: 
Wh en t heid ea is , to cre ate anarchive,whi c h co nt ai ns thejars, that ar emarked wit hthe  scope p rovidedin the pom.xml. So if m u ltipleweb -apps  use  these sa mejars,the y  can b e depl oyedto  th e centr a l  p lac ein the wen c ont ainer  p rovi der (To mcat / Jetty / JBo s s /  etc).
For as  fa r as I  k now th e reis noo p tion in Maven t o create a na rc hive, fort hes eprovide d depen denci e s. Or s ome other  way to e xt ract t hem  easily fr om the M aven repo s itory . 
A  ques tio n rise sWhy  woul d youd o s o? Ma ny pro je cts mo ve th es e days t o Docker or similar sol utions . Whi chdeploy ju sto neweb-app i n on e containe r.Sono ne edf or th e co m pl exi t y ofsear c hing forc om min l ib raries andp l a cin g the m u p fronton t he web container. Etc etc.
Anoth er q u e sti onW hy a dd  complexity. A n e as i e r set-up  i s to add al l depend ed jarsto the  web-a pp. Asd i sk spaceandnet work spee d /  c a pacity,  i sm ost of  the  t ime no t an i s sue. 
</groupId>
 _ _   _<artifactId>postgresql</artifactId>
 __ __  <version>9.1-901-1.jdbc4</version>
_  _</dependency>
</dependencies>
<build>
   _<finalName>mSampleJDBCTempPrj</finalName>
  __<pluginManagement>
    <plugins>
        <plugin>
 __ ___    _<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
    _ _     <configuration>
  __  _        _<source>1.7</source>
     _  ___   _ <target>1.7</target>
    _     _ </configuration>
     _  </plugin>
   _    <plugin>
_ _    _  _ <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
_  _     _  <artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId>
_     __  __<version>2.9</version>

_ _  __ __  <executions>
   __      _   _<execution>
_   _    _     _ _ _<id>copy-dependencies</id>
          _     _   <phase>package</phase>
_ __  __ _      _ _ <goals>
    _   __     _     _  <goal>copy-dependencies</goal>
  ___    _     _  _ </goals>
     __     __     _<configuration>
__    _     _        _  <!--_<includeScope>provided</includeScope> -->
   ___         _ _  _   <outputDirectory>/Users/venugopal/Documents/providedDependencies</outputDirectory>
      _      _      </configuration>
    _       _   </execution>
   _   __   </executions>
   ____ </plugin>
 _  </plugins>
_  _</pluginManagement>
</build>

A:

When the_idea is, to_create an_archive, which contains_the_jars, that are marked with the scope provided in the pom.xml. So if multiple web-apps use these same_jars, they can be deployed to_the central place in the_wen_container provider (Tomcat_/ Jetty / JBoss_/ etc).
For as far as I know there_is no option in Maven to create an archive,_for_these provided_dependencies. Or some other_way to_extract them_easily from the_Maven repository.
A_question rises_Why would_you do so? Many projects move these_days_to Docker or similar solutions. Which deploy just one_web-app_in_one_container. So no_need for the_complexity of searching_for commin libraries_and_placing them upfront on the web_container. Etc etc.
Another_question Why add complexity._An easier set-up is to add all depended jars to_the web-app. As disk space and network speed / capacity, is most of the time not an_issue.
