 255);
            builder.Append(c);
        }
    }
    string result = builder.ToString();

 Q:

Burninate [players]. The tag, I mean

I've browsed through the players questions and found these ones:

Questions about issues with problem-players
Questions about  social aspects of role-playing games or group-dynamics
Question about absent-players
Questions about a random TRPG problem, in which players are involved somehow

There are more descriptive tags for types 1-3 questions, and type 4 is basically the majority of questions on RPG.SE. Do we really need the players tag?

A:

We don't need it.
I will agree with what was stated in the answers of the Worth of "GM" and "players" tags question.
My opinion on tags is simple: if I go into the tag query, I should know what I will be looking at. IMO tags are mostly used for filtering and searching. If I have a metagaming problem and I want to check if it was already asked, I will search the metagaming tag. If I feel I have decent lawyering skills, I will put the rules-as-written in my favorites and look for answering these. Point being: the tags I personally consider useful are tags that describe what the question is about.
The players tag doesn't. As you said, if I look through this tag, I don't know if I'm looking at "I am a player" questions (which doesn't actually need a tag, imo), "I have a problem with a player" questions (which can be either my problem with him being as a player or as a person, so either problem-players or something social or group-dynamics as you said) or even simply "There are players involved" (which any question about an actual table will have, supposedly). Point being: I don't have a clue what I would be looking at if I went through the players tag. (tbh I didn't even know it existed until now). Many of the questions are actually gm-techniques questions, and I wouldn't expect that in a tag called "players".

Okay but how do we know that's not just you being dumb?

Well, I searched through the tag. I still don't know what the tag is about.

How can I interest a player in
255); 
             builder. Append(c); 
         } 
     } 
     string result = builder. ToString (); 

  Q: 

 Burninate [ players ]. The tag, I think of 

 I've browse through the players questions and found these one: 

 Questions about issues with trouble - players 
 Questions about   social aspects of function - playing games or group - moral force 
 Question about absent - players 
 Questions about a random TRPG problem, in which players are involve somehow 

 There are more descriptive tags for types 1 - 3 questions, and type 4 is basically the majority of question on RPG.SE. Do we really need the players chase? 

 A: 

 We don't need it. 
 I will match with what was stated in the answer of the Worth of " GM " and " players " tags question. 
 My opinion on tags is childlike: if I go into the tag query, I should know what I will be looking at. IMO tags are mostly used for filtering and searching. If I have a metagaming problem and I want to check if it was already asked, I will search the metagaming tag. If I feel I suffer decent lawyering skills, I will arrange the rule - as - written in my favorites and look for suffice these. Point being: the tags I personally consider useful are tags that identify what the question is about. 
 The players tag doesn't. As you said, if I look through this rag, I don't know if I'm looking at " I am a player " questions (which doesn't actually need a tag, imo), " I have a trouble with a musician " questions (which can be either my problem with him being as a player or as a person, so either trouble - players or something social or group - dynamics as you said) or even simply " There are players involved " (which any question about an actual table will consume, supposedly). Point being: I don't have a clue what I would be looking at if I went through the player tag. (tbh I didn't even acknowledge it existed until immediately). Many of the questions are actually gm - techniques questions, and I wouldn't expect that in a rag called " players ". 

 Okay but how do we know that's not precisely you being dumb? 

 Well, I searched through the tag. I still don't know what the rag is about. 

 How can I interest a player in
 255);
            builder.Append(c);
        }
    }
    string resulf = builddr.ToString();

 Q:

Burninate [playerd]. Rhe tqg, I mean

I've browsed tfrough thv players quewrions and hkund thcfe ohcs:

Quevvions about issoes with protlem-players
Quevtkous about  social aspects of role-playyng gamrs or group-dynamycs
Qleftioh about absent-players
Questions aboht a raidom TRPG problrm, in which players are ingolvfd somehow

There arf more desctjptyce tags for gypes 1-3 questions, and tipe 4 is basically the majority ow quextions on T'T.SE. Go we reallb need the players tag?

A:

We gon't nerd it.
I will agvee wmth qhat was stated in thx answers of the Worjh of "GM" atd "players" tags quewtuon.
My opition in gaga ms aimple: if I go into the tag quwry, I should know wnae I will be lokking wt. IMO tags are mostly used for filtering ans searching. If I have a metagaming problem ajd I want to check if it was already asked, I will search tve mevaeamnkn tae. Iv I feel I have decent lawyering skills, I wilj pit the rules-as-wrltten in my favoriyed sgd look for avsweriuf fhese. Point being: hhe tagf I pwrsonally conxider useful are tags that eescribe whan thw question is abouc.
The players tag doesm't. As you said, if I looy thdough this hag, I don'f know if I'm lookkng ad "I am a player" questions (rhich doewn't cctually neec a tad, imo), "I hage a isoblem with a playfr" qugstionv (which caj be either my problem with him being as a plsyar mr as a 'erson, so either prjblem-players ot somethiug sockal or grolp-dynamicv as you sayd) or even sikkly "There are players invilvee" (which xny question anout an abtbal table will have, supposevly). Kojnt being: I don'c yave a clue whay I wotlf ue lojning at if I weng tftough the playerw tag. (tbh I didn't even knmw if existed until noe). Iany of jhe questyons are actuslly gm-techniques euestmons, aid I wpulqn't expect that in a tag calles "players".

Lkan but how do re kkow jhat's not jbst you being dumb?

Well, I searched througi the tag. I still don't jnow what the tag ix about.

How cen I igterest a player in
255); builder.Append(c); } } string result = Burninate The tag, mean I've browsed found ones: Questions about with problem-players Questions social aspects of role-playing games or Question about absent-players Questions about a random TRPG problem, in which players are somehow There are more descriptive tags for types 1-3 questions, and type 4 basically majority questions RPG.SE. Do we really need the players tag? A: We don't need it. I will agree what was stated in the answers of the of "GM" and "players" question. My opinion on tags simple: I go the query, should know what will be looking at. IMO tags are mostly used for filtering and searching. If I have a problem and to check it already I will search tag. If I feel I have I will put the rules-as-written in my favorites look for these. Point being: the tags I consider useful are tags that describe what the is about. The players tag doesn't. As you said, if I look through this tag, know if I'm looking "I am a questions doesn't need tag, imo), have a problem with a player" questions (which can be either problem with him being as a player or as a either or something social group-dynamics as you said) even "There are players involved" question an have, Point I don't have a what I would be looking if I went through didn't even know it existed until now). Many the questions are actually gm-techniques questions, and wouldn't expect that in a tag called "players". Okay but how do know that's you being dumb? Well, I searched through the I still don't know the tag is about. How can I interest a in
 255);
            builder.Append(c);
        }
    }
    string resulT = builder.TostrinG();

 Q:

BUrnInAte [pLayeRs]. The tag, I mean

I'VE broWsed through the players qUestiOnS And fOUnD thesE ones:

QuEStIONs aBoUt IssUeS WiTh proBleM-playerS
Questions AboUt  Social aspectS Of Role-playinG gaMes or group-dyNamIcs
QueStIon ABout aBseNt-plaYers
QuEStions About a ranDoM tRPG prOBlem, in wHICh PlayErs are involved somEHoW

there are more deScriptIvE TaGS For TypEs 1-3 questionS, aNd typE 4 Is basicALlY THE maJOrity of questiOns on RPG.SE. DO We rEally nEeD thE PlayerS tag?

A:

we DOn't Need it.
I will AgreE with what Was staTEd in the ANswers oF the WoRth Of "Gm" and "PLaYeRs" tAgS QueSTiOn.
MY OpiNion on taGs Is SimplE: if I GO INTo thE taG queRy, I shOuld know what I WilL be lOOkiNg at. ImO tagS are MoStly uSed for FilteRiNg and searching. IF I haVe a metagaMinG pRobLeM and I WAnt to cHecK if It was alReady asKEd, I WiLL SEaRch the metagaming taG. IF i FeEl I have dEcent lAWyErINg skills, i wIll Put tHE Rules-As-wrITtEn in my faVoriteS AnD lOok for aNsWering ThEse. poiNt beiNG: the Tags I pErsonallY consIDer useful are taGS that describe WHaT THe QUestIon Is about.
The pLayeRS tag DoesN'T. AS yoU Said, iF I looK tHRoUGh this tag, I don't know iF I'M lookiNg at "I Am a player" quesTions (which DOESn't actuaLly nEEd A Tag, imo), "I have a prOblem With a playeR" QuestionS (whicH can be eiTher my proBLEm with hiM beIng As a PlaYER oR as a person, so eITHer pRoBlem-plaYerS or someThiNg sOciAl oR gRoup-dynamIcs as you SaId) Or EvEn sImply "tHere are pLaYerS iNvoLved" (wHIch any QuestIon aBoUt AN acTual tabLE wILL havE, sUpPoseDly). poInt beIng: I DOn't Have a clUe what I woUld BE looKiNg At if I weNt through the pLaYers tag. (tbh i dIdn'T even kNOW it existEd until now). Many of the quesTIons are ActUally Gm-teChniques qUesTions, aNd I WOuldn't Expect That iN a Tag CALled "pLAYeRs".

OKaY but how do wE KNow That's NoT jusT you beiNg dumb?

Well, I searcheD ThrOugh the tag. I stIll Don't KNOw WhaT ThE Tag Is ABouT.

hOw can I interest a Player in
 255);
            builder .Append(c) ;
      } 
   } 
   string result = bu ilder.ToString();

 Q: 

Bur ni n ate[ pl ayers ]. Thet ag , I m ea n
I' ve br owsed  th rough t he players  qu es tions and fo u nd  these one s:
Questions a bou t issu es  wi t h pro ble m-pla yers
Q u estion s about so c ial as p ects of r ol e-pl aying games or gr o up - dynamics
Quest ion ab ou t  a b s ent -pl ayers
Ques ti ons a b out a r a nd o m TRP G  problem, inwhich playe r s a re inv ol ved someho w

Th er e  ar e more desc ript ive tagsfor ty p es 1-3q uestion s, and  ty pe4 is ba si cal ly the ma jor i tyof quest io ns  on R PG.S E . D o we  re ally  need  the playerstag ?

A : 

W e don 't ne ed i t. 
I wi ll agr ee wi th  what was state d in  the answ ers  o f t he  Wort h  of "G M"and  "playe rs" tag s  qu es t i o n. 
My opinion on tag si s  s imple: i f I go in to the tagqu ery , Is h ouldknow wh at I wil l be l o ok in g at. I MO  tagsar e m ost ly us e d fo r filt ering an d sea r ching. If I ha v e a metagamin g  p r o bl e m an d I  want to ch ecki f it  was al rea d y ask ed, I  w i ll search the metagami ng  tag.If Ifeel I have d ecent lawy e r i ng skill s, I wi l l put the rule s-as- written in my favor itesand look  for answ e r ing thes e.Poi ntbei n g :the tags I pe r s onal ly  consid erusefulare  ta gstha tdescribewhat the  q ue st io n i s abo u t.
The p la yer stag  does n 't. As  yousaid ,if I l ook thr o ug h this  t ag , Idon 't  know  ifI 'mlooking  at "I am  ap laye r"  q uestion s (which does n' t actually  n eed  a tag , imo), "I  have a problem with ap layer"que stion s (w hich canbeeither  my proble m with  himbe ing a s a p l a ye r o ras a perso n ,  so  eith er  pro blem-pl ayers or something soc ial or group- dyn amic s as  yo u  s a id)  o r  ev e n  simply "Thereare player si nv olved" (wh i chan y quest ion abo ut an actualtable wil l have, s up pose d l y).  Point bei ng: I do n't havea  clue wh at Iwou ld belo oki ng at  if Iw ent  thro ugh th eplayer s tag .(tbh I d idn't even know it exis ted un til n ow) . Many of  th e  qu estions a re a ctually gm -te chn iques  qu e stion s, a n dI w o uldn' t ex p ect thati na t a g  c alled "play e r s ".
Okay  bu t  how d o we  know that's notj ust you beingdumb ? 
We ll, I se ar ched through t heta g .  I still  d on't know w hat theta g  is a bout.
How c an I in t e re s t a pl ayer  in 
 255);
_ _   _ __ _builder.Append(c);
_  _  _ }
  _ }
 __ string result = builder.ToString();

 Q:

Burninate [players]. The tag, I mean

I've browsed through the_players_questions and_found_these_ones:

Questions about issues with problem-players
Questions_about  social aspects of_role-playing games_or group-dynamics
Question about absent-players
Questions about a random TRPG_problem,_in which players_are involved somehow

There are more descriptive tags for types_1-3 questions, and type 4 is_basically the majority_of_questions_on RPG.SE. Do we_really need the players tag?

A:

We don't_need it.
I will agree with what_was stated in the answers of the_Worth of "GM" and "players" tags_question.
My opinion on tags is_simple: if_I go into the tag_query, I should_know what_I will be_looking at. IMO tags are mostly_used for filtering_and searching. If I have a_metagaming_problem and I_want_to_check if_it was already_asked,_I will_search_the metagaming tag. If I feel_I_have decent lawyering skills, I will put_the rules-as-written in my_favorites_and look for answering_these. Point being: the tags_I personally consider useful are tags_that describe_what the_question is about.
The players tag doesn't. As you said, if I_look through this tag, I don't_know if I'm looking_at "I_am_a player" questions_(which_doesn't actually_need a tag, imo), "I have a_problem with_a player" questions (which can be_either my problem with_him_being as a player or as_a person, so either problem-players or_something social or group-dynamics as_you_said)_or even simply "There are_players involved" (which any question about_an actual table_will have, supposedly). Point being: I don't_have_a clue what I would be_looking_at if I went through the_players_tag._(tbh I didn't even know_it existed until now). Many of_the questions are actually gm-techniques questions, and I wouldn't_expect that in_a tag called "players".

Okay but_how_do_we know that's not just you being dumb?

Well, I searched_through the_tag. I still_don't know what the tag is about.

How can I interest_a player in