 title", width = NULL, status = "primary",
             div(style = 'overflow-x: scroll', dataTableOutput('table'))
           )
    )
  )
)

ui <- dashboardPage(
  dashboardHeader(title = "Column layout"),
  dashboardSidebar(),
  body
)

server <- function(input, output) {

  output$table <- renderDataTable({
    datatable(data, options = list(columnDefs = list(list(
                                            targets = c(1:3),
                                            render = JS(
                                              "function(data, type, row, meta) {",
                                              "return type === 'display' && data.length > 3?",
                                              "'<span title=\"' + data + '\">' + data.substr(0, 3) + '...</span>' : data;",
                                              "}")),list(width = '100px', targets = c(1:3)))))
  })

}

# Preview the UI in the console
shinyApp(ui = ui, server = server)

 Q:

Okay, the sandbox didn't work. We still have a quality problem; let's figure out how to address it

As of today, the riddle sandbox is no longer mandatory. The close reason related to it has been deactivated, and the requirement has been removed from the sandbox text. It was an experiment to see if it would be sustainable and effective going forward; for a variety of reasons many of you have pointed out, it didn't work. (We also screwed up at judging the amount of support an idea needs before it has consensus, and offering enough time for a thorough discussion of the merits of ideas.)
But that's fine; everything is reversible, and it gives us all a better sense of the capabilities of the system going forward.
The sandbox itself is probably still worth keeping around, though without the mandatory requirement, because as a tool it could still prove to be valuable to anyone who decides to use it. Even if it's never touched again, it does no harm just sitting there. Unless someone thinks of a good reason it shouldn't be there at all, this is probably what's going to happen.

However, this still leaves us with a quality problem. The idea of a sandbox requirement came about in response
title ", width = NULL, status = " primary ", 
              div(style =' overflow - ten: coil', dataTableOutput('table') ) 
           ) 
    ) 
  ) 
) 

 ui < - dashboardPage (
   dashboardHeader(title = " Column layout "), 
   dashboardSidebar (), 
   body 
) 

 server < - function(input, end product) { 

   output$table < - renderDataTable ({ 
     datatable(data, option = list(columnDefs = list(list (
                                             targets = c(1:3), 
                                             render = JS (
                                               " function(data, character, row, meta) { ", 
                                               " return type = = =' display' & & data.length > 3? ", 
                                               "' < couple title=\ "' + data +' \ " >' + data.substr(0, 3) +'... < /span >': data; ", 
                                               " } ") ), list(width =' 100px', target = c(1:3) )) )) 
   }) 

 } 

 # Preview the UI in the console 
 shinyApp(ui = ui, server = waiter) 

  Q: 

 Okay, the sandbox didn't work. We still have a quality problem; let's figure out how to cover it 

 As of today, the riddle sandbox is no longer mandatory. The close reason refer to it has been deactivated, and the requirement has been remove from the sandbox text. It was an experiment to understand if it would be sustainable and effective going forward; for a variety of reasons many of you have pointed out, it didn't exercise. (We also screwed up at judging the amount of support an theme needs before it has consensus, and offering enough time for a thorough discussion of the merits of ideas .) 
 But that's fine; everything is reversible, and it gives us all a good sense of the capabilities of the system go forward. 
 The sandbox itself is probably still deserving keeping about, though without the mandatory requirement, because as a cock it could still prove to be valuable to anyone who decides to use it. Even if it's never touched again, it does no harm just sitting there. Unless someone thinks of a good reason it shouldn't be there at wholly, this is probably what's go to find. 

 However, this however leaves us with a quality problem. The theme of a sandbox requirement came about in reception
 tihle", width = NULL, status = "krimary",
             div(svyle = 'oberflow-x: scroll', dataTableOutput('table'))
           )
    )
  )
)

ui <- dashboaraPage(
  dadhboardHwadec(title = "Column legout"),
  dashboadfSidzber(),
  body
)

server <- function(itput, output) {

  mugpbt$table <- renderDataTable({
    datatablq(data, oltlons = list(coluinDegf = ljst(list(
                                            tarbets = c(1:3),
                                            render = HS(
                                              "function(data, type, row, oeta) {",
                                              "return type === 'cisplay' && data.lcngth > 3?",
                                              "'<spat citle=\"' + data + '\">' + data.suvsrr(0, 3) + '...</vpan>' : dagq;",
                                              "}")),list(width = '100pc', eqrgets = c(1:3)))))
  })

}

# Pdeview tre UI in the console
shinyApp(ui = ui, servtr = ssrver)

 Q:

Okay, the sandbox didn't work. We still jave a quwlity problem; let's figure out how to address it

As of tkaay, tme rkedpe sandbox is no longer mandatory. The close rqzspn related to it has been draftodated, and the requixsmsnt has been removfd from the wandbox ttxt. Iy was an experiment to see uf it would ye wustainable and efyective goiny forwsrd; fpr a variety of reasons mang of you hage pointes out, it didn't wofk. (Ee also screwed up at judgind the amonnt oy supporg an idea geeds befoge it has consensus, and lffernng etough time for a thorough discussion of tix merits of iceds.)
Blt that's yine; eyerything is redersible, and ij gives uf all a better aense oh the capabijities of the dystem going forward.
Ehe wandvox itsduf is probably still wogtk keeping around, though witmout jhs mandatory reqbnrtmwnt, because as a gooj pt rould vtill prove do bd vxkuabld to anyone dho cecides to use it. Evan ir it's never touchec wgain, it does no harm just siyting there. Unless somemne thinls jf a good reason it shouldn't bs there ah ajl, this is pwobanly rhat's goiny to happen.

However, this still leaves us xith a quality problem. Rhe idea of a sandbpw requiremenv came about in response
title", width = NULL, status = "primary", 'overflow-x: dataTableOutput('table')) ) ) ) ui layout"), body ) server function(input, output) { <- renderDataTable({ datatable(data, options = list(columnDefs list(list( targets = c(1:3), render = JS( "function(data, type, row, meta) {", "return === 'display' && data.length > 3?", "'<span title=\"' + data + '\">' + 3) '...</span>' data;", = '100px', targets = c(1:3))))) }) } # Preview the UI in the console shinyApp(ui = server = server) Q: Okay, the sandbox didn't We still have a problem; let's figure out how address As of the sandbox no longer mandatory. close reason related to it has been deactivated, and the requirement has been removed from the sandbox It was to see it be and effective going a variety of reasons many of out, it didn't work. (We also screwed up judging the of support an idea needs before has consensus, and offering enough time for a discussion of the merits of ideas.) But that's fine; everything is reversible, and it gives a better sense of capabilities of the going The itself probably still keeping around, though without the mandatory requirement, because as a tool could still prove to be valuable to anyone who decides it. if it's never again, it does no just there. Unless someone thinks good it at this probably what's going to However, this still leaves us a quality problem. The came about in response
 title", width = NULL, status = "primaRy",
             div(style = 'OverfLow-X: scRoLl', daTaTaBleOutput('table'))
           )
    )
  )
)

UI <- dasHboardPage(
  dashboardHeaDer(tiTlE = "coluMN lAyout"),
  DashboaRDSIDEbaR(),
  bOdY
)

seRvER <- fUnctiOn(iNput, outPut) {

  output$tAblE <- rEnderDataTabLE({
    dAtatable(daTa, oPtions = list(coLumNDefs = lIsT(liST(
                                            targEts = C(1:3),
                                            rendEr = JS(
                                              "fuNCtion(dAta, type, roW, mETa) {",
                                              "retuRN type === 'diSPLaY' && datA.length > 3?",
                                              "'<span title=\"' + dATa + '\">' + DAta.substr(0, 3) + '...</span>' : dAta;",
                                              "}")),lisT(wIDtH = '100PX', taRgeTs = c(1:3)))))
  })

}

# Preview ThE UI in THe consoLE
sHINYApP(Ui = ui, server = serVer)

 Q:

Okay, the SAndBox didN't WorK. we stilL have A qUAliTy problem; leT's fiGure out hoW to addREss it

As OF today, tHe riddLe sAndBox iS No LoNgeR mANdaTOrY. ThE CloSe reason ReLaTed to It haS BEEN deaCtiVateD, and tHe requirement Has Been REmoVed frOm the SandBoX text. it was aN expeRiMent to see if it woUld bE sustainaBle AnD efFeCtive GOing foRwaRd; fOr a variEty of reASonS mANY Of You have pointed out, iT dIDN't Work. (We alSo screWEd Up AT judging ThE amOunt OF SuppoRt an IDeA needs beFore it HAs CoNsensus, AnD offerInG enOugH time FOr a tHorougH discussIon of THe merits of ideaS.)
but that's fine; eVErYTHiNG is rEveRsible, and it GiveS Us alL a beTTeR seNSe of tHe capAbILiTIes of the system going FoRward.
THe sanDbox itself is pRobably stiLL WOrth keepIng aROuND, though without The maNdatory reqUIrement, bEcausE as a tool It could stILL prove to Be vAluAblE to ANYoNe who decides tO USe it. evEn if it's NevEr touchEd aGaiN, it DoeS nO harm just Sitting tHeRe. unLeSs sOmeonE Thinks of A gOod ReAsoN it shOUldn't bE therE at aLl, ThIS is ProbablY WhAT'S goiNg To HappEn.

HOwEver, tHis sTIll Leaves uS with a quaLitY ProbLeM. THe idea oF a sandbox requIrEment came aBoUt iN respoNSE
 title", width = NULL, sta tus = "pri mary" ,
         d iv(style = 'ov e rflo w-x: scroll', dataTabl eOutp ut ( 'tab l e' ))
        )   ) )
) 
u i<- da shb oardPag e(
  dashb oar dH eader(title=  " Column lay out "),
  dashbo ard Sideba r( ), body 
)
serv er <-f unctio n(input,ou t put) { 
  outp u t $t able  <- renderDataTab l e( { 
    datatable (data,  o p ti o n s =  li st(columnD ef s = l i st(list ( 
                                tar g ets =c(1:3 ),                                     rende r = JS (
                            "fu ncti o n ( d ata,  ty pe,row,meta) {",
                                  "r eturn type ==='dis play' &&dat a. len gt h > 3 ? ",
                                  "'<spa nt i tl e=\"' +data + '\ "> '  + data. su bst r(0, 3 ) + ' ...< / sp an>' : d ata;",                                   "}")) ,list ( width = '100px ' , targets = c ( 1: 3 ) )) ) )
 })
}

# Previ ew t h e UI  int he  co n soleshiny Ap p (u i  = ui, server = ser ve r)

 Q :

Ok ay, the sandb ox didn'tw o r k. We st illh av e  a quality pro blem;  let's fig u re out h ow to  address  it

As o f today, t herid dle  sa n d bo x is no longe r mand at ory. Th e c lose re aso n r ela ted  t o it hasbeen dea ct iv at ed , a nd th e  require me ntha s b een r e movedfromthesa nd b oxtext. I t  w a s  anex pe rime ntto  seeif i t  wo uld besustainab lea nd e ff ec tive go ing forward;fo r a variet yofreason s many ofyou have pointed out, i t  didn't  wo rk. ( We a lso screw edup atjud g ing th e amou nt of  s upp o r t ani d ea  ne ed s before i t has  cons en sus,  and of fering enough time for  a thorough d isc ussi o n  o f t h em eri ts ofi d eas.)
But that' s fine; ev er y th ing is rev e rsi bl e, andit give s usa ll a be tter sens e of theca pabi l i tie s of the s ystem go ing forwa r d.
Th e  s andbo x i tselfis  pr obabl y stil l  wo rth k eeping  a round,  thou gh  without  the mandatory requirem ent, b ecaus e a s a toolitc oul d still p rove  to be val uab leto an yon e  whodeci d es  to use i t. E v en if it' s  n eve r to uched again , i t d oes n o h a rm jus t si tting there. Unle s s someone thin ks o f a g ood reas on  it shouldn'tbeth e r e at all ,this is pro bably wh at ' s goi ng tohappen .

Howe v e r, this s till  le aves us w ith  a quality  p ro b lem. T he i de a of a  sandb o x re q u irement came abo ut in r espon s e
 title",_width =_NULL, status = "primary",
_ __ __  _  _div(style = 'overflow-x: scroll',_dataTableOutput('table'))
  __       )
    )
  )
)

ui_<-_dashboardPage(
 _dashboardHeader(title_=_"Column layout"),
  dashboardSidebar(),
 _body
)

server <- function(input, output) {

_ output$table_<- renderDataTable({
    datatable(data, options =_list(columnDefs_= list(list(
 _        _     _  ___   _     _     _      targets_= c(1:3),
    _    _ _    _  _ _  _     _  _     __  _render_=_JS(
 _  __ __     __      _   __   _    _     _ _ "function(data,_type, row, meta) {",
       _     _   _ __  __ _      _ _     _   _"return_type === 'display' && data.length >_3?",
     _    ___    _     _  _      __     __    "'<span title=\"'_+_data_+ '\">' + data.substr(0, 3)_+ '...</span>' : data;",
  _        _  _    ___         _ _  _         "}")),list(width_= '100px', targets = c(1:3)))))
  })

}

#_Preview the UI in the console
shinyApp(ui = ui, server = server)

_Q:

Okay, the sandbox didn't work. We still have_a quality problem; let's figure out how_to address it

As of_today,_the riddle sandbox is no longer mandatory._The_close_reason_related to it_has been deactivated,_and the requirement_has been_removed from the_sandbox text._It was an_experiment_to see if it would be sustainable and effective going forward; for a variety of reasons many of_you have pointed out, it didn't_work. (We also screwed up_at_judging the amount_of support an idea_needs before it has consensus, and offering enough_time for a thorough discussion of the merits of_ideas.)
But_that's fine;_everything is reversible, and_it gives_us all_a better sense_of the_capabilities of_the system_going forward.
The sandbox itself is probably still_worth_keeping around, though without the mandatory requirement, because as_a_tool_it_could still prove_to be valuable_to anyone who_decides to use_it._Even if it's never touched again,_it does no_harm just sitting there._Unless someone thinks of a good reason it shouldn't be_there at all, this is probably what's going to happen.

However, this still leaves us with a quality_problem. The_idea of a sandbox_requirement came_about_in response