 that invaders made use of the existing religious monument, but it is perhaps somewhat more likely that there existed at least a strain of continuity between the Stone Age, Bronze Age, and  Iron Age peoples of the island.
Some of the Iron Age Britons may have been the first to call themselves British, or Pretanoi. The Greek Pytheas "discovered" Britain in c. 325 BC. This event marked the beginning of the expansion of the Greco-Roman world northward in Europe. Between 200 BC and AD 43, the Germanic-Celtic refugees from Gaul began migrating to Britain, as the Romans expanded into Gaul. The southern tribes started to become more Romanized, and it is this influence of Germanic and Roman culture which began the transition of the Britons into the English.
By AD 40, the Roman Empire had conquered southern Britain, and the period known as Roman Britain began. It is the Romano-British culture which gave rise to the early legends which would later be transformed into the Arthur myth. After the Romans withdrew from Britain in about AD 410, the Germanic Anglo-Saxons began their series of invasions of the island. As Wikipedia puts it:

Traditionally, it was believed that a mass invasion by various Anglo-Saxon tribes largely displaced the indigenous British population in southern and eastern Great Britain (modern-day England with the exception of Cornwall).

However, recent genetic studies show that there was not really a mass displacement at all. Rather, the relatively small groups of Anglo-Saxon invaders had a large cultural impact on the existing British population. The most notable theory to explain why the Anglo-Saxon culture had such a profound effect on the indigenous people is that the political and economic dominance of the Anglo-Saxons made their culture more desirable. Of course, what exactly gave the Anglo-Saxons an advantage is more complex, and I'll leave that up to the reader to pursue further (more information is available in the linked Wikipedia articles).
By 1066, when William the Conqueror took the English throne, the English culture was already well established, and William's advancements--such as new castles and a census--served only to strengthen the fledgling nation.
The answer to your question, then, is that the English are likely dominant because they are probably composed of the steadily growing population sprung from the more or less original inhabitants of the island. Wales and Scotland, then, are
that invaders made use of the existing religious memorial, but it is possibly somewhat more likely that there exist at least a tune of continuity between the Stone Age, Bronze Age, and   Iron Age peoples of the island. 
 Some of the Iron Age Britons may have been the first to address themselves British, or Pretanoi. The Greek Pytheas " discover " Britain in c. 325 BC. This event score the beginning of the expansion of the Greco - Roman world northward in Europe. Between 200 BC and AD 43, the Germanic - Celtic refugee from Gaul began migrating to Britain, as the Romans expanded into Gaul. The southern tribe started to become more Romanized, and it is this influence of Germanic and Roman culture which began the transition of the Britons into the English. 
 By AD 40, the Roman Empire had conquered southerly Britain, and the period known as Roman Britain began. It is the Romano - British polish which gave rise to the early legends which would later be transform into the Arthur myth. After the Romans withdrew from Britain in about AD 410, the Germanic Anglo - Saxons began their series of invasions of the island. As Wikipedia puts it: 

 Traditionally, it was think that a mass invasion by various Anglo - Saxon tribes largely displaced the indigenous British population in southerly and eastern Great Britain (modern - day England with the exception of Cornwall). 

 However, recent genetic studies show that there was not really a mass supplanting at all. Rather, the relatively belittled groups of Anglo - Saxon invaders had a large cultural impingement on the existing British population. The most notable theory to excuse why the Anglo - Saxon culture had such a profound effect on the indigenous people is that the political and economic dominance of the Anglo - Saxons made their culture more desirable. Of course, what exactly gave the Anglo - Saxons an advantage is more complex, and I'll entrust that up to the lector to pursue further (more information is available in the linked Wikipedia articles). 
 By 1066, when William the Conqueror took the English toilet, the English culture was already well established, and William's advancements -- such as new castles and a census -- served only to strengthen the fledgling state. 
 The answer to your question, then, is that the English are likely dominant because they are probably compose of the steadily growing population jump from the more or less original inhabitants of the island. Wales and Scotland, then, are
 thwt invaders made use of uhe existing reliyuous mmnumenf, but it is perhaps somewhat more lineoy thqt there existed at lexst a strwin of cintiiuity between thx Stone Age, Brkkze Aye, and  Iron Age peoples ox the island.
Soke oy the Iron Age Britons may have been the fitsh to call themfelvts Fritjsh, or Pretanoi. The Greek Pytheas "siscoveged" Britain in c. 325 BC. This event marked the hegijning of the expandion of the Gresi-Roman world northward in Europe. Bgtween 200 BC and AD 43, the Germanic-Cdltic refugees drim Hdul began mmgratigg to Britaik, as tha Romanx expanded intp Geul. Rhe southern tribes svarted to become morg Romanizeg, cnd it is this influebcw of Cermdnic qnd Rojai chlture whmch began tge transitiin of the Britons imtj the English.
Bg AD 40, ehq Roman Empire had conquered southern Bgitajn, and the period known as Roman Britain begwn. It is ehe Romano-British culture which gave rise to the aarly uegtnes whkxh would later be transformed into the Arthur mrfh. Anter the Romans cithdrew from Brotwim in about AD 410, the Gzdmznic Anglo-Saxons bfgan thgir seeies of igvasoons of the island. As Wikipwdia puts it:

Nradutionally, it was bzlieved that a msss imvasion by various Anglu-Saxkn tribes lwrgely diaolaced the indigdnols Bsitish population in southqrn and eesteru Great Critsin (moqern-day Enhland with the exception of Clrtwall).

Howevfr, recent genetic studies show viat there was nmt geally a iass cisplacement wt all. Rather, jhe relatnvely rmall grouis of Angno-Saxon invwders had a ldtge cultural mmpact on the exiwting Bfktish populatipn. The most notable theory to explain whi fhe Anglo-Saxon ebluuee had such a lrowougd ehfect mn the indiganour pdpple ks that the ooliyical and economic dmminznce of the Anglo-Ssxjns made their ctlture more drsirable. Of course, what exectly bavg the Anglo-Saxons an advantage js more clmpjex, and I'll jeavc thwt up to tke reader to pursue further (more informavion is available in thw linked Wikipedia cruicles).
By 1066, whei Willyam the Cmnqueror took the Entlish throne, the Tnglish culture was alrsady wall edtablished, and William's advancements--such as new castles and a census--servee only to strengthsn tne flvdgjnng natyon.
Tie answer to your auestion, then, is that the Englirh are lhkzly dominant because they are pfobably compored of the steadily growjng popukation sprung from the more or kess original inhabitantx of the islahd. Walva end Scotland, then, arr
that invaders made use of the existing but is perhaps more likely that strain continuity between the Age, Bronze Age, Iron Age peoples of the island. of the Iron Age Britons may have been the first to call themselves or Pretanoi. The Greek Pytheas "discovered" Britain in c. 325 BC. This event the of expansion the Greco-Roman world northward in Europe. Between 200 BC and AD 43, the Germanic-Celtic refugees from began migrating to Britain, as the Romans expanded Gaul. The southern tribes to become more Romanized, and is influence of and culture began the transition the Britons into the English. By AD 40, the Roman Empire had conquered southern Britain, and the known as began. It the culture gave rise to legends which would later be transformed myth. After the Romans withdrew from Britain in AD 410, Germanic Anglo-Saxons began their series of of the island. As Wikipedia puts it: Traditionally, was believed that a mass invasion by various Anglo-Saxon tribes largely displaced the indigenous British southern and eastern Great (modern-day England with exception Cornwall). recent studies show there was not really a mass displacement at all. Rather, the small groups of Anglo-Saxon invaders had a large cultural impact existing population. The most theory to explain why Anglo-Saxon had such a profound the people political economic of the Anglo-Saxons made culture more desirable. Of course, exactly gave the Anglo-Saxons and I'll leave that up to the reader pursue further (more information is available in linked Wikipedia articles). By 1066, when William the Conqueror took the English the English already well established, and William's advancements--such as new and a census--served only strengthen the fledgling nation. The answer to your question, is the English likely dominant because are probably composed the steadily growing from the or original island. Wales and Scotland, then, are
 that invaders made use of the eXisting relIgiouS moNumEnT, but It is Perhaps somewhaT More Likely that there existed At leaSt A StraIN oF contInuity bETwEEN thE SToNe AGe, bRoNze AgE, anD  Iron AgE peoples of The IsLand.
Some of thE irOn Age BritoNs mAy have been thE fiRst to cAlL thEMselvEs BRitisH, or PreTAnoi. ThE Greek PytHeAS "discoVEred" BriTAIn In c. 325 Bc. This event marked tHE bEGinning of the exPansioN oF ThE gRecO-RoMan world noRtHward IN Europe. bEtWEEN 200 BC ANd AD 43, the GermanIc-Celtic refUGeeS from GAuL beGAn migrAting To bRitAin, as the RomAns eXpanded inTo Gaul. tHe southERn tribeS startEd tO beCome MOrE ROmaNiZEd, aND iT is THis InfluencE oF GErmanIc anD rOMAn cuLtuRe whIch beGan the transitIon Of thE briTons iNto thE EngLiSh.
By Ad 40, the RoMan EmPiRe had conquered sOuthErn BritaiN, anD tHe pErIod knOWn as RoMan briTain begAn. It is tHE RoMaNO-bRiTish culture which gaVe RISe To the earLy legeNDs WhICh would lAtEr bE traNSFormeD intO ThE Arthur mYth. AftER tHe romans wItHdrew fRoM BrItaIn in aBOut Ad 410, the GeRmanic AnGlo-SaXOns began their sERies of invasioNS oF THe ISlanD. As wikipedia puTs it:

tRadiTionALlY, it WAs belIeved ThAT a MAss invasion by variouS ANglo-SaXon trIbes largely diSplaced the INDIgenous BRitiSH pOPulation in soutHern aNd eastern GREat BritaIn (modErn-day EnGland with THE exceptiOn oF CoRnwAll).

hOWeVer, recent geneTIC stuDiEs show tHat There waS noT reAllY a mAsS displaceMent at alL. RAtHeR, tHe rElatiVEly small GrOupS oF AnGlo-SaXOn invaDers hAd a lArGe CUltUral impACt ON The eXiStIng BRitIsH popuLatiON. ThE most noTable theoRy tO ExplAiN wHy the AnGlo-Saxon cultuRe Had such a prOfOunD effecT ON the indiGenous people is that the poLItical aNd eConomIc doMinance of The anglo-SAxoNS made tHeir cuLture MoRe dESIrablE. oF cOurSe, What exactlY GAve The AnGlO-SaxOns an adVantage is more complEX, anD I'll leave that Up tO the REAdEr tO PuRSue FuRTheR (MOre information iS available In THe Linked WikiPEdiA aRticles).
by 1066, when WIlliaM The ConqUeror took The EnglisH tHronE, THe ENglish cultUre was alReady well EStablIShEd, and wilLiam's aDvAncEmentS--such aS New CastlEs and a CeNsus--seRved oNlY to strenGthen the fledgling nation.
the ansWer to YouR question, TheN, Is tHat the EngLish Are likely dOmiNanT becaUse THey arE proBAbLy cOMposeD of tHE steadily GRoWinG POpUlation spruNG FRom The moRe oR Less orIginAl inhabitants of thE Island. Wales and scotLANd, tHen, ARe
 that invaders made use of  the exist ing r eli gio us  mon umen t, but it is p e rhap s somewhat more likely  that  t h eree xi stedat leas t  a s tra in  o f c on t in uitybet ween th e Stone Ag e,Br onze Age, an d  Iron Age p eop les of the i sla nd.
So me  of the I ron  AgeBriton s  may h ave beenth e  first to call t he msel ves British, or P r et a noi. The Greek  Pythe as "d i s cov ere d" Britain  i n c.3 25 BC.T hi s e ven t  marked the b eginning of the  expan si ono f theGreco -R o man  world nort hwar d in Euro pe. Be t ween 20 0  BC and  AD 43 , t heGerm a ni c- Cel ti c  re f ug ees fro m Gaul b eg an  migr atin g t o  Bri tai n, a s the  Romans expan ded  int o  Ga ul. T he so uthe rn  trib es sta rtedto  become more Ro mani zed, anditis  th is  infl u ence o f G erm anic an d Roman cul tu r e wh ich began the tran si t i on  of theBriton s  i nt o  the Eng li sh. 
ByA D  40,theR om an Empir e hadc on qu ered so ut hern B ri tai n,and t h e pe riod k nown asRoman Britain began. It is the Rom a no - B ri t ishcul ture whichgave rise  tot he  ea r ly le gends  w h ic h  would later be tra ns formed  into  the Arthur m yth. After t h e Romans  wit h dr e w from Britain  in a bout AD 41 0 , the Ge rmani c Anglo- Saxons be g a n theirser ies  of  in v a si ons of the is l a nd.As  Wikipe dia  puts i t:
Tr adi tio na lly, it w as belie ve dth at  amassi nvasionby  va ri ous  Angl o -Saxon  trib es l ar ge l y d isplace d  t h e  ind ig en ousBri ti sh po pula t ion  in sou thern and  ea s tern  G re at Brit ain (modern-d ay  England w it h t he exc e p tion ofCornwall).

However, re c ent gen eti c stu dies  show tha t t here w asn ot rea lly amassdi spl a c ement a tall .Rather, th e rel ative ly  sma ll grou ps of Anglo-Saxoni nva ders had a la rge  cul t u ra l i m pa c t o nt hee x isting Britishpopulation .T he  most nota b leth eory to  explai n why the Ang lo-Saxonculture h ad  suc h a p rofound ef fect onthe indig e nousp eo ple i s t hat th epol itica l ande con omicdomina nc e of t he An gl o-Saxons  made their culture mor e desi rable . O f course,  wh a t e xactly ga ve t he Anglo-S axo nsan ad van t age i s mo r ecom p lex,andI 'll leave th atu p  t o the reade r t o p ursue  fu r ther ( more  information is a v ailable in the  lin k e d W iki p edia  a rticles).
By 1 066 ,w h en Willi am  the Conque ror took  t h e Eng lish t hrone,  the En g l is h  cultu re w asalready w ell  e s tablish ed ,a nd Wil liam 's  advan cement s --su c h  as new castlesand a c ensus - -se rvedon ly to s t reng then the f ledgling na tion.Theanswe r to yo ur  quest ion ,then, is t h at the En glish  are li ke ly d omi nant b ecau s e  they  are  p rob ably comp o s ed of  t h e s tead ily g ro wing  populati o n sprung  fr o m the m or e o r less o r ig i n al inhabit ant s oft h e island.W ales an d  Scot land,then,are
 that_invaders made_use of the existing_religious monument,_but_it is_perhaps_somewhat more likely_that there existed_at least a strain_of continuity between_the_Stone Age, Bronze Age, and  Iron Age peoples of the island.
Some of the_Iron_Age Britons_may_have_been the first to call_themselves British, or Pretanoi. The_Greek Pytheas_"discovered" Britain in c. 325 BC. This event_marked_the beginning of_the expansion of the Greco-Roman world northward in Europe._Between 200 BC and AD 43,_the Germanic-Celtic refugees_from_Gaul_began migrating to Britain,_as the Romans expanded into Gaul._The southern tribes started to become_more Romanized, and it is this influence_of Germanic and Roman culture which_began the transition of the_Britons into_the English.
By AD 40, the_Roman Empire had_conquered southern_Britain, and the_period known as Roman Britain began._It is the_Romano-British culture which gave rise to_the_early legends which_would_later_be transformed_into the Arthur_myth._After the_Romans_withdrew from Britain in about AD_410,_the Germanic Anglo-Saxons began their series of_invasions of the island._As_Wikipedia puts it:

Traditionally, it_was believed that a mass_invasion by various Anglo-Saxon tribes largely_displaced the_indigenous British_population in southern and eastern Great Britain (modern-day England with the_exception of Cornwall).

However, recent genetic studies_show that there was_not really_a_mass displacement at_all._Rather, the_relatively small groups of Anglo-Saxon invaders had_a large_cultural impact on the existing British_population. The most notable_theory_to explain why the Anglo-Saxon culture_had such a profound effect on_the indigenous people is that_the_political_and economic dominance of the_Anglo-Saxons made their culture more desirable._Of course, what_exactly gave the Anglo-Saxons an advantage is_more_complex, and I'll leave that up_to_the reader to pursue further (more_information_is_available in the linked Wikipedia_articles).
By 1066, when William the Conqueror_took the English throne, the English culture was already_well established, and_William's advancements--such as new castles_and_a_census--served only to strengthen the fledgling nation.
The answer to your_question, then,_is that the_English are likely dominant because they are probably composed of_the steadily growing population sprung from the_more or less original inhabitants of the island. Wales and Scotland,_then, are