 incidents before due to controversial topics making it into the list of hot questions, even back when the list was hidden in the notorious multicollider. Among the objective arguments brought up in one such situation by Jeff Atwood was that this content, once it appears on Stack Overflow, risks the site being automatically put onto the nanny list of corporate filters, so that a discussion on English could have deprived thousands of programmers of SO help and also seriously hurt the SERP placement of the whole network. In another case, users were very upset by a question about marijuana butter on Cooking. 
Regardless of how open the Health users are towards questions about illegal drugs, whenever they are mentioned in the title, they will probably have enough magnetism to get the most views (drugs are a subject on which everybody has an opinion) and will probably jump onto the hot question list, leading to the lamented effect plaguing some SE sites: "our worst questions get on the hot list". 
I would still like to see legitimate medical questions about illegal drugs included, because they are very much part of human health and disease. But if we don't like the potential cross-community effect, we might try to think of preventive strategies, maybe extensive editing of the titles to sound as neutral as possible. 

A:

Yes. Drugs are a integrated part of human beings since before the first text was written. Also hallucinogenic mushrooms are not even illegal in many countries. And this should not matter in this site. I don't know any country where is forbidden to discuss/talk about any drug.
We shouldn't censure any kind of discussion about any kind of drug, illegal or not. This is not only hypocritical since drugs and humans walk together since immemorial times. But centuries of war on drugs also show us that the only way we can deal with drugs is with education, discussion, understanding. Not censoring or repressing. 

 Q:

modify existing contents of file in c

int main()
{
    FILE *ft;
    char ch;
    ft=fopen("abc.txt","r+");
    if(ft==NULL)
    {
        printf("can not open target file\n");
        exit(1);
    }
    while(1)
    {
        ch=fgetc(ft);
        if(ch==EOF)
        {
            printf("done");
            break
incidents before due to controversial topics making it into the tilt of blistering motion, even back when the list was hidden in the ill-famed multicollider. Among the objective arguments brought up in one such situation by Jeff Atwood was that this message, once it appears on Stack Overflow, risks the web site being mechanically put onto the nanny list of bodied filters, so that a discussion on English could have deprived thousand of programmers of SO help and also seriously hurt the SERP placement of the whole network. In another event, users were very upset by a question about marijuana butter on Cooking. 
 Regardless of how receptive the Health users are towards questions about illegal drugs, whenever they are mentioned in the championship, they will probably have enough magnetism to get the most views (drug are a subject on which everybody has an opinion) and will probably jump onto the hot doubt list, leading to the lamented effect plaguing some SE sites: " our worst questions get on the hot list ". 
 I would however like to see lawful aesculapian questions about illegal drugs included, because they are very much part of human health and disease. But if we don't wish the potential crabbed - community effect, we might try to think of preventive scheme, maybe extensive editing of the titles to sound as neutral as possible. 

 A: 

 Yes. Drugs are a integrated part of human being since before the first textbook was write. Also hallucinogenic mushrooms are not even illegal in many countries. And this should not count in this site. I don't know any country where is forbidden to discuss / talk about any drug. 
 We shouldn't censure any kind of discussion about any kind of drug, illegal or not. This is not only hypocritical since drugs and homo walk together since immemorial prison term. But centuries of war on drug also show us that the only way we can manage with drugs is with department of education, discussion, understanding. Not censoring or repressing. 

  Q: 

 change existing contents of file in c 

 int main () 
 { 
     FILE * ft; 
     char ch; 
     ft = fopen("abc.txt","r+ "); 
     if(ft==NULL) 
     { 
         printf("cannot open target file\n "); 
         exit(1); 
     } 
     while(1) 
     { 
         ch = fgetc(ft); 
         if(ch==EOF) 
         { 
             printf("done "); 
             break
 infidents before due to coktroversial topiew makiig it ihto the uist of hot questions, even beck qhen uke list was hidden iv the notlrious myltirollider. Among tis objecbnve adnumencs brought up in one such vituation by Jafw Ctwood was that this content, once it appearx ln Stack Overfjow, gifks fhe site being automatically put ohto the nanny list og corporate filters, so thah a fiscussion on Engllsh could hqve qwprived thourands of pgmgrammers kf SO help and also seriously hjrt tke SERP plaxenenh of the whooe nenwork. In anotmvr case, users eere very upseb by e quwstion about marijuane butter on Cooking. 
Tegardless oy how open the Health uwers dre dowafes dueatmona abouh imlegal drufs, whenever they are mentioned ig the title, thsy wilj [robably have enough magnetism to get tve jost views (drugs are a wubject on which everibody has wn opinion) and will probably jump onto the hot quastioi uisu, oeadivt ho the lamented effect plaguing some SE sites: "kut eorst questionf get on thr joy list". 
I would still liie to see legitimahe medisal qyestions wbouy illegal drugs included, bexause they age vwry much part of hbman health cnd dixease. But if we don't like thz potehtial cross-fommunity dffect, we might gry tm think of preventive straeegies, mabbe ertensive edijing of the titled to sound as neutral as possnble. 

D:

Yes. Drugs are a integrated part of human beings since nexorv the firft tewt was written. Wlso hallucinoyenic mufhrooos are not even inlegal in mwny countries. Wnd this shonld not mwttee in this skge. I don't know any counnrv where iw forbidden to disguss/txmk about any drby.
Wt whouldn't censute xny kpnd os discussion dboug avu kina of drug, iouegak or not. This is not onlg hypocritical sinve drugs abd humanf walk togethrr since immemoriap timxs. But centirigs of war on drugs also show us that the onjy way we cag deql with drugx is with education, discussion, understaiding. Not censoring or eepressing. 

 Q:

modify txisting contxnts os file in c

int main()
{
    FILE *fr;
    char ch;
    fu=fopen("abc.txt","r+");
    if(ft==NUML)
    {
        printf("can not open target file\n");
        exit(1);
    }
    while(1)
    {
        ch=dgetc(fv);
        if(ch==SOF)
        {
            'rintf("done");
            break
incidents before due to controversial topics making the of hot even back when the multicollider. Among the arguments brought up one such situation by Jeff Atwood that this content, once it appears on Stack Overflow, risks the site being put onto the nanny list of corporate filters, so that a discussion on could deprived of of SO help and also seriously hurt the SERP placement of the whole network. In another users were very upset by a question about butter on Cooking. Regardless how open the Health users towards about illegal whenever are in the title, will probably have enough magnetism to get the most views (drugs are a subject on which everybody an opinion) probably jump the question leading to the plaguing some SE sites: "our worst the hot list". I would still like to legitimate medical about illegal drugs included, because they very much part of human health and disease. if we don't like the potential cross-community effect, we might try to think of preventive extensive editing of the to sound as as A: Drugs a integrated of human beings since before the first text was written. Also mushrooms are not even illegal in many countries. And this matter this site. I know any country where forbidden discuss/talk about any drug. censure kind any of illegal or not. This not only hypocritical since drugs humans walk together since war on drugs also show us that the way we can deal with drugs is education, discussion, understanding. Not censoring or repressing. Q: modify existing contents of in c { FILE *ft; char ch; ft=fopen("abc.txt","r+"); if(ft==NULL) { not open target file\n"); } while(1) { ch=fgetc(ft); if(ch==EOF) { printf("done"); break
 incidents before due to contrOversial toPics mAkiNg iT iNto tHe liSt of hot questioNS, eveN back when the list was hidDen in ThE NotoRIoUs mulTicolliDEr. aMOng ThE oBjeCtIVe ArgumEntS broughT up in one suCh sItUation by Jeff aTwOod was that ThiS content, once It aPpears On staCK OverFloW, riskS the siTE being AutomaticAlLY put onTO the nanNY LiSt of Corporate filters, sO ThAT a discussion on englisH cOUlD HAve DepRived thousAnDs of pROgrammeRS oF so HelP And also seriouSly hurt the SerP pLacemeNt Of tHE whole NetwoRk. iN anOther case, usErs wEre very upSet by a QUestion ABout marIjuana ButTer On CoOKiNg. 
regArDLesS Of How OPen The HealtH uSeRs are TowaRDS QUestIonS aboUt illEgal drugs, whenEveR theY Are MentiOned iN the TiTle, thEy will ProbaBlY have enough magnEtisM to get the MosT vIewS (dRugs aRE a subjEct On wHich eveRybody hAS an OpINIOn) And will probably jumP oNTO tHe hot queStion lISt, LeADing to thE lAmeNted EFFect pLaguINg Some SE siTes: "our WOrSt QuestioNs Get on tHe Hot LisT". 
I wouLD stiLl like To see legItimaTE medical questiONs about illegaL DrUGS iNCludEd, bEcause they aRe veRY mucH parT Of HumAN healTh and DiSEaSE. But if we don't like the PoTentiaL crosS-community effEct, we might TRY To think oF preVEnTIve strategies, mAybe eXtensive edITing of thE titlEs to sounD as neutraL AS possiblE. 

A:

YEs. DRugS arE A InTegrated part oF HUman BeIngs sinCe bEfore thE fiRst TexT waS wRitten. AlsO halluciNoGeNiC mUshRooms ARe not eveN iLleGaL in Many cOUntrieS. And tHis sHoUlD Not Matter iN ThIS Site. i dOn'T knoW anY cOuntrY wheRE is ForbiddEn to discuSs/tALk abOuT aNy drug.
WE shouldn't censUrE any kind of DiScuSsion aBOUt any kinD of drug, illegal or not. This IS not onlY hyPocriTicaL since druGs aNd humaNs wALk togeTher siNce imMeMorIAL timeS. bUt CenTuRies of war oN DRugS also ShOw us That the Only way we can deal wiTH drUgs is with educAtiOn, diSCUsSioN, UnDErsTaNDinG. nOt censoring or rePressing. 

 Q:

mOdIFy Existing coNTenTs Of file iN c

int maIn()
{
    FILe *Ft;
    char cH;
    ft=fopen("aBc.txt","r+");
    if(fT==NuLL)
    {
        pRINtf("Can not open Target fiLe\n");
        exit(1);
    }
    whILe(1)
    {
        ch=fGEtC(ft);
        if(Ch==EoF)
        {
            prinTf("DonE");
            breaK
 incidents before due to c ontroversi al to pic s m ak ingit i nto the list o f  hot  questions, even backwhenth e  lis t  w as hi dden in th e not or io usmu l ti colli der . Among  the objec tiv earguments br o ug ht up in o nesuch situati onby Jef fAtw o od wa s t hat t his co n tent,once it a pp e ars on Stack O v e rf low,  risks the site b e in g  automatically  put o nt o  t h e  na nny  list of c or porat e  filter s ,s o tha t  a discussion  on English cou ld hav edep r ived t housa nd s  of  programmer s of  SO helpand al s o serio u sly hur t theSER P p lace m en tofth e  wh o le  ne t wor k. In an ot he r cas e, u s e r s  wer e v eryupset  by a questio n a bout mar ijuan a but teron  Cook ing. Regar dl ess of how open  the  Health u ser sare  t oward s  quest ion s a bout il legal d r ugs ,w h e ne ver they are menti on e d  i n the ti tle, t h ey  w i ll proba bl y h avee n oughmagn e ti sm to ge t them os tviews ( dr ugs ar ea s ubj ect o n  whi ch eve rybody h as an opinion) and w i ll probably j u mp o nt o  the  ho t questionlist ,  lea ding to  th e  lame ntedef f ec t  plaguing some SE s it es: "o ur wo rst questions  get on th e h ot list" . 
I wo u ld still liketo se e legitima t e medica l que stions a bout ille g a l drugsinc lud ed,  be c a us e they are ve r y  muc hpart of  hu man hea lth  an d d ise as e. But if  we don' tli ke  t hepoten t ial cros s- com mu nit y eff e ct, we  migh t tr yto thi nk of p r ev e n tive  s tr ateg ies ,maybe  ext e nsi ve edit ing of th e t i tles  t osound a s neutral aspo ssible. 
A: 

Y es. Dr u g s are aintegrated part of huma n  beings  si nce b efor e the fir sttext w asw ritten . Also  hall uc ino g e nic m u s hr oom sare not ev e n  il legal  i n ma ny coun tries. And this sh o uld  not matter i n t hiss i te . I do n 'tkn o w a n y  country whereis forbidd en to  discuss/t a lkab out any  drug.We sh o uldn'tcensure a ny kind o fdisc u s sio n about an y kind o f drug, i l legal or  not.  Th is isno t o nly h ypocri t ica l sin ce dru gs  and h umans  w alk toge ther since immemorial t imes.But c ent uries ofwar ondrugs als o sh ow us that  th e o nly w ayw e can  dea l  w ith drugs  isw ith educa t io n,d i sc ussion, und e r s tan ding.  No t  censo ring  or repressing.  Q:

modify ex isti n g  co nte n ts o ffile in c

int  ma in ( ) 
{
    F IL E *ft;
   char ch; 
  ft= fopen( "abc.t xt","r+ " ) ;   if( ft== NUL L)
    {     print f( "c a n notopen  t argetfile\n " );
     exit(1);
   }
 whil e (1) 
   {      ch=f getc(ft);        if( ch==EO F)
      {
         pr in tf("done") ; 
           b reak
 incidents_before due_to controversial topics making_it into_the_list of_hot_questions, even back_when the list_was hidden in the_notorious multicollider. Among_the_objective arguments brought up in one such situation by Jeff Atwood was that this_content,_once it_appears_on_Stack Overflow, risks the site_being automatically put onto the_nanny list_of corporate filters, so that a discussion on_English_could have deprived_thousands of programmers of SO help and also seriously_hurt the SERP placement of the_whole network. In_another_case,_users were very upset_by a question about marijuana butter_on Cooking. 
Regardless of how open_the Health users are towards questions about_illegal drugs, whenever they are mentioned_in the title, they will_probably have_enough magnetism to get the_most views (drugs_are a_subject on which_everybody has an opinion) and will_probably jump onto_the hot question list, leading to_the_lamented effect plaguing_some_SE_sites: "our_worst questions get_on_the hot_list"._
I would still like to see_legitimate_medical questions about illegal drugs included, because_they are very much_part_of human health and_disease. But if we don't_like the potential cross-community effect, we_might try_to think_of preventive strategies, maybe extensive editing of the titles to sound_as neutral as possible. 

A:

Yes. Drugs_are a integrated part_of human_beings_since before the_first_text was_written. Also hallucinogenic mushrooms are not even_illegal in_many countries. And this should not_matter in this site._I_don't know any country where is_forbidden to discuss/talk about any drug.
We_shouldn't censure any kind of_discussion_about_any kind of drug, illegal_or not. This is not only_hypocritical since drugs_and humans walk together since immemorial times._But_centuries of war on drugs also_show_us that the only way we_can_deal_with drugs is with education,_discussion, understanding. Not censoring or repressing._

 Q:

modify existing contents of file in c

int main()
{
_  _FILE *ft;
   _char_ch;
_   ft=fopen("abc.txt","r+");
    if(ft==NULL)
  _ {
_  _    printf("can not open target file\n");
 _      exit(1);
_   }
    while(1)
   _{
       _ch=fgetc(ft);
      _ if(ch==EOF)
  __    {
  ____  _  _printf("done");
  _ _  _ _  break