text
stringlengths 0
6.44k
|
---|
modifications to the C&SF Project for improving the quality of the environment;
|
protecting water quality in the south Florida ecosystem; improving protection of the
|
aquifer; improving the integrity, capability, and conservation of urban and
|
agricultural water supplies; and improving other water-related purposes.
|
Summary
|
Final Feasibility Report and PEIS April 1999
|
ii
|
The following principles guided the development of the recommended
|
Comprehensive Plan:
|
· The overarching objective of the Comprehensive Plan is the restoration,
|
preservation and protection of the south Florida ecosystem while providing
|
for other water related needs of the region;
|
· The Comprehensive Plan will be based on the best available science, and
|
independent scientific review will be an integral part of its development and
|
implementation;
|
· The Comprehensive Plan will be developed through an inclusive and open
|
process that engages all stakeholders;
|
· All applicable Federal, tribal, state, and local agencies will be full partners
|
and their views will be considered fully; and
|
· The Comprehensive Plan must be a flexible plan that is based on the concept
|
of adaptive assessment – recognizing that modifications will be made in the
|
future based on new information.
|
Although this document meets the requirements of Section 404 (r) of the
|
Clean Water Act (Public Law 92-500, as amended), as addressed in Annex C, the
|
Corps will request a Section 401 State water quality certificate during subsequent
|
phases of this project.
|
The final integrated feasibility report and Programmatic Environmental
|
Impact Statement is being transmitted through the Division Engineer and the
|
Washington-level Federal report review process, which will include reviews by the
|
Chief of Engineers and the Secretary of the Army. The Assistant Secretary of the
|
Army for Civil Works, representing the Secretary of the Army, will coordinate the
|
documents with the Office of Management and Budget, and send them to Congress.
|
The study authority states that the Secretary shall transmit the Comprehensive Plan
|
to Congress not later than July 1, 1999.
|
MAJOR CONCLUSIONS
|
The Everglades has molded the regional character of central and southern
|
Florida and sustains the economic and cultural growth of the region. The
|
Everglades has influenced the regional mosaics of space and landscape patterns -
|
urban, agricultural and natural. As such, it epitomizes the region's sense of
|
definition and place. As importantly, the Everglades is unlike any other place in the
|
world.
|
The remaining Everglades and other natural ecosystems in south Florida no
|
longer exhibit the functions, richness, and spatial extent that defined the predrainage systems. There have been substantial and irreversible reductions in the
|
Summary
|
Final Feasibility Report and PEIS April 1999
|
iii
|
spatial extent of the wetland systems (including an approximately 50 percent
|
reduction in the extent of the true Everglades) and in the total water storage,
|
timing, and flow capacities of these systems. These natural systems will not recover
|
their defining characteristics under current conditions and will not be sustained
|
into the future. Indeed, the health of the ecosystem will continue to decline unless
|
corrective actions are taken. For example, wading birds, whose numbers have
|
already decreased by 85-90 percent, are key indicators of broad, regional patterns of
|
aquatic production. There is a continuing reduction in the total number of birds
|
initiating breeding in south Florida. Fisheries, including economically important
|
recreational and commercial species, continue to decline steadily in many areas of
|
south Florida, affecting the natural and the human environment.
|
Several of the major unintended impacts to the natural system attributed to
|
the C&SF Project in south Florida include the following:
|
· extreme fluctuations in high and low water levels in Lake Okeechobee have a
|
major adverse impact on the lake’s littoral and pelagic zones and fish and
|
wildlife habitats;
|
· extreme fluctuations between too much and too little freshwater discharge
|
into the Caloosahatchee and St. Lucie estuaries result in detrimental salinity
|
conditions and physical alterations of fish and wildlife habitat;
|
· detrimental hydrologic conditions in freshwater wetland habitats cause major
|
adverse impacts on plant and animal communities of the native Everglades;
|
and
|
· unsuitable freshwater flows to Florida and Biscayne bays and Lake Worth
|
Lagoon adversely impact salinity and physically alter fish and wildlife
|
habitat.
|
Water quality throughout south Florida has also deteriorated over the past
|
50 years since construction started on the C&SF Project. Many wetlands that acted
|
as natural filters and retention areas either can no longer serve these purposes or
|
have been lost to drainage or development. Urban and agricultural development
|
and drainage systems result in the rapid discharge of runoff containing pollutants
|
into south Florida’s water bodies. As a result, many water bodies throughout south
|
Florida presently do not meet water quality standards. Untreated urban and
|
agricultural storm water that does not meet water quality standards is sometimes
|
sent to natural areas. Excessive nutrients entering the Everglades have led to an
|
overabundance of cattails, a visible sign of unfavorable water quality conditions and
|
a potential decline in ecological productivity. Flood control releases from Lake
|
Okeechobee and runoff discharged via secondary drainage canals in the St. Lucie
|
River Basin have been linked to fish lesions and a decline in estuarine productivity,
|
resulting in substantial ecological and economic impacts.
|
Summary
|
Final Feasibility Report and PEIS April 1999
|
iv
|
Adequately and reliably meeting water supply for all sectors is also a
|
problem. Historically, most rainwater soaked into the ground in the region’s vast
|
wetlands. As south Florida developed, the canal network worked too effectively and
|
drained too much water off the land too quickly. The result is that not enough water
|
is stored for all uses. Water shortages that occur today are expected to become more
|
frequent without any changes to the water management system. Without the steps
|
outlined in this Comprehensive Plan, conflicts over the allocation of water needed
|
for natural, agricultural, and urban areas will only increase.
|
Flooding is also a problem. Florida is a low-lying, flat, and wet state. Today,
|
the Project provides flood protection on a regional basis for south Florida, supported
|
by many locally operated canal networks. The Comprehensive Plan will maintain,
|
and in some situations improve, this important protection from flooding.
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.