On November 23, 2018, the Brussels Parliament unanimously voted to recognize animals – previously categorized with property and immobile goods – as a special category. Under the new legislation, animals will be categorized as “a living being endowed with sensitivity, interests of its own and dignity, that benefits from special protection.” Similar measures that would codify this understanding of animals as sentient beings are reportedly being considered at the federal level in Belgium, as well.

According to the Brussels Secretary of State in charge of animal welfare, Bianca Debaets, “The ultimate aim is for animals to benefit finally from the legal status that corresponds to their biological nature.”

Brussels is not alone in amending its law to recognize animals are more than “things” or mere property. In 2015, France[1], New Zealand[2] and Quebec[3] similarly amended their laws to recognize animals as sentient beings.

Most recently, in September 2018, Slovakia updated the definition of “animals” in its Civil Code to reflect that they are living beings, not things. The Slovak Spectator reports that under the new definition, “animals will enjoy special status and value as living creatures that are able to perceive the world with their own senses. Provisions on movable things apply to animals but not if it contradicts the nature of an animal as a living creature.”

Several countries have also included provisions relating to animal sentience, dignity, or protection in their constitutions, most recently Austria in 2013[4] and Egypt in 2014[5].

In the U.S., animals are classified as property and for the most part considered to be “objects” under the law. However, some state legislatures have addressed animal sentience. For example, as a result of legislation that the Animal Legal Defense Fund helped draft and pass in 2013, Oregon law recognizes that “animals are sentient beings capable of experiencing pain, stress and fear[6].”

What effect these laws will have on everyday practices or enforcement remains to be seen, but they are undoubtedly a step in the right direction and signal a growing awareness that the law is antiquated in many cases when it comes to its conception of animals. Animals are different from “property” in significant and intrinsic ways, and the law should evolve to recognize them as such.

Further Reading:

● Sentient Legislation: Animal Legal Defense Fund’s Canadian Province Rankings Motivate Change. The Animal Legal Defense Fund. October 21, 2015.