text
stringlengths 524
26.6k
| response
stringlengths 0
389
|
|---|---|
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
China is a firm proponent and practitioner of multilateralism, which has all along supported the #UN in playing an active role, upheld its authority and stature. https://t.co/wlOrde7AlV | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#OTD in 2015 #Russia joined the fight vs terrorists in #Syria under official request of Damascus. In 5 years, the true anti-terrorist coalition defeated #ISIS, helped free nearly all territory of #Syria. Now its time to focus on rebuilding the country & bringing back the refugees https://t.co/X0iN7YcnUu | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#FacesOfVictory / #WWII legend & 🎖️ Hero of the Soviet Union Alexey #Voloshin passed away at the age of 100. A true war hero, artillery commander, 1 of 3 #RedArmy officers awarded US #SilverStar, standard-bearer at Victory Parade of 1945 - 🕯️ he will be remembered for generations https://t.co/0hVf41Fr2I | B appeal to commonality - flag waving |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Those who stifle and repress #Venezuela’s democratic aspirations will be held accountable. Today the U.S. sanctions seven Maduro-aligned individuals involved in the failed takeover of @AsambleaVE. Venezuela’s security forces owe allegiance to the Venezuelan people, not Maduro. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Spoke with @AUC_MoussaFaki about the EU's global package of €15.6 bn to support partner countries addressing the #coronavirus. Africa will especially benefit from the package. The @EU_Commission stands ready to work with the @_AfricanUnion to mitigate the impact of the pandemic. https://t.co/3972UIQyKn | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
How is #US in any position to blame China? https://t.co/8sT1FJF7N8 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#OPINION | "US now openly admits its goal in #Syria is to make it 'difficult' for Moscow and Damascus to defeat terrorists" Interesting piece by @NebojsaMalic for RT, worth reading! ➡️ https://t.co/pPTucZcIkv | #Russia #Idlib #US #ISIS #Nusra #روسيا #داعش #سوريا #ادلب https://t.co/pyIOQlPHBf | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Adoption of security law for Hong Kong is not in conformity with China’s international commitments. As a matter of values and principles, we need to uphold international commitments. “One country, two systems” is key principle for Hong Kong’s autonomy.
https://t.co/Y7RvUVJf0k | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
World War II, Greek history and US foreign policy. A special reading list for a special summer #Chalkidiki #TravelSafe https://t.co/mLD0AVvUMk | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
As a developing country, China still faces the problem of uneven regional development. I believe the guideline issued on Sunday will bring new development opportunities to the vast western regions of China, and inject more momentum into the Belt and Road Initiative. https://t.co/odv6UUBDck | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The United States looks forward to welcoming Prime Minister @Netanyahu & Blue & White Chairman @Gantzbe to the @WhiteHouse next week. Reports about details and timing of our closely-held peace plan are purely speculative. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Democrats in Congress have made unserious offers full of requests that have nothing to do with Coronavirus relief for American citizens.
We have raised our offer and included additional provisions above and beyond Speaker Pelosi's requests.
It's time to deliver for Americans. https://t.co/b4BMOqX42r | B appeal to commonality - flag waving |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Want to explore Europe’s #culture & #heritage this summer?
Get inspired with the European Heritage Label - milestones in the creation of 🇪🇺 as we know it today. #EuropeForCulture @europe_creative
👇👇
https://t.co/JGlpYyzyym https://t.co/0vhcWBBf8c | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Top 3️⃣ reasons why UK students take GCSE and ALevel in Russian.
🇷🇺A boost to the future career and education
🇷🇺Access to a rich, diverse culture
🇷🇺A great travel destination
Thank you to all the students from @ZnaniyeUK for sharing their passion for Russian language🕊 https://t.co/qwJtZwFOMJ | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The EU Delegation, in agreement with the EU Heads of Mission based in Kabul and the Ambassador of Canada, wish to communicate the following regarding the Afghan Peace Process.
Please read the full statement below. https://t.co/5lJ8ylTJa1 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🗣️ Youth voices matter!
We are teaming up with @UNICEF to connect young people from Africa and Europe and to turn their challenges into solutions.
Join #YourVoiceYourFuture via #Ureport 👉🏾 https://t.co/8fBostbL3E https://t.co/FCImyJidKT | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
.@SecPompeo discusses how the United States has worked with its allies and partners in Europe and around the world to stand for freedom against the Chinese Communist Party's malign influence. https://t.co/0Rxic6l43s | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The #Coronavirus outbreak, mapped with latest data.
The EU has helped repatriate 447 EU citizens from Wuhan, delivered 12 tonnes of personal protective equipment to the Chinese authorities, and has earmarked €10 million for research into vaccines. #EUprotects 🇪🇺 https://t.co/ML77XEf1p4 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#OTD 🚢In 1806 #Neva boat led by Yuri #Lisyansky successfully arrived in #Kronshtadt. 🌊🌎Neva ship had been staying in the first #Russian expedition around the world for 3️⃣ years and 2️⃣ months. ☝️This voyage has played a great role in the development of ethnography. https://t.co/UWjVosf2fT | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🇷🇺🤝🇮🇹:
Russian military assisted to mount & equip field hospital in 🇮🇹#Bergamo: diagnosis, intensive care (20+15 ventilators), therapy's & recovery units for 142 #Coronavirus patients.
200 🇷🇺 & 🇮🇹 medics start working 24/7 in joint teams to ✋#COVID19
@rusembitaly @ItalyinRussia https://t.co/ruFFZAJw97 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#Lukashevich: We are concerned by the activity of the #US biological dual-purpose laboratories in #Georgia and #Ukraine where reportedly, under the guise of infectious disease control, experiments with the most dangerous viruses and pathogens are conducted https://t.co/ItSkRwME23 | M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
我正在看【Ambassador Cui Tiankai calls for choosing the right side of history and returning to the right track of China-US relations — Embassy of the People's Republic of China in the United States of America】，分享给你，一起看吧！ https://t.co/4lmLHAWIXa | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The Coronavirus #GlobalResponse has so far raised €9.8 billion in pledges.
Tomorrow, we will host with @glblctzn the #GlobalGoalUnite for our Future Summit & Concert to mobilise more funding for vaccines, tests and treatments: https://t.co/GmBBB9QzhH
#UnitedAgainstCoronavirus https://t.co/JOQgfpnS0a | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
☝ Briefing by Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria #Zakharova, Moscow, February 12, 2020
🔗 Read the transcript at our web site➡https://t.co/u5ZO8Qeg5P
#MFA #Russia #Lavrov #Syria #Ukraine #China #Latvia #Poland #History #Victory75 #UE https://t.co/jkTd8qH4kV | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The United States is deeply disappointed by the election of China, Russia, and Cuba to seats on the UN Human Rights Council. The election of some of the world's worst human rights offenders to these positions makes a farce of the Council’s mission. https://t.co/K8e92pOmuL | C discrediting the opponent - name calling |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The future of Belarus must be decided by the Belarusian people. 🇧🇾
At the #EUCO videoconference today, the EU leaders agreed to support peaceful democratic transition in Belarus and sanction all responsible for violence and falsification of the election results. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
President @realDonaldTrump believes that the future must hold a fully free Western Hemisphere.
He stands with every citizen of Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela in their fight for liberty.
Freedom will prevail over communism! https://t.co/zXzIQbhqiT | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The United States is committed to supporting free and fair elections, including the upcoming elections across Africa. We will not hesitate to consider consequences – including visa restrictions – for those who undermine democracy. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
On behalf of the government of Tanzania we are pleased that the government of Russia opened the sky for Tanzania, side by side with only Britain and Turkey. This will increase the number of tourists coming to Tanzania from Russia. #TanzaniaUnforgettable #HK CC: @rusembtz https://t.co/NiYaX7eWgg | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Pleased to return to Bogota. Looking forward to meetings with Colombian government leaders to underscore U.S. commitment to regional and global counterterrorism efforts, as well as counternarcotics cooperation with #Colombia. https://t.co/APdPIwa99V | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
MEPP: Speech by HR/VP Josep Borrell in the EP on the US Middle East initiative
https://t.co/e5iD8RKLbO | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
.@SecPompeo: This mission of defending human dignity – and religious freedom in particular – is at the core of American foreign policy. That’s because it’s at the heart of the American experiment. https://t.co/DC2NXrtiFc https://t.co/bYqY9Pj2CK | B appeal to commonality - flag waving |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Happy 55th #IndependenceDay Maldives! On behalf of the American people, I extend my sincere and best wishes to the people and government of this amazing country. Our partnership is strong and growing stronger. @abdulla_shahid @MoFAmv @ibusolih @presidencymv https://t.co/nUV3pDTM59 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Some people are used to judging China by "western democracy", other than that, they see no democracy or only suppression of it. But an objective&deep insight into China and its decision-making process & officials selection/appointment system will lead to a different conclusion. https://t.co/mPX0wBUp1D | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#OTD 🇷🇺🇮🇳🤝 Twenty years ago, the Russian Federation and the Republic of India signed the Declaration on Strategic Partnership.
Today #Russia and #India are consistently realising the potential of bilateral partnership in all key areas.
🔗_x000D_https://t.co/9FJi2pVEeL https://t.co/pwq6Dh5j5l | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
We are fighting the Coronavirus on every possible front—and we will achieve total victory with the help of the American people. https://t.co/kAAd87lZZF | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Any unbiased person can see clearly who is the biggest disinformation spreader. The EU report ignores the obvious facts while making baseless accusations against China. This makes the report itself disinformation. https://t.co/Xgt4QlTRlO | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
FM #Lavrov: Russia is & always has been opposed to coercive measures & has welcomed political & diplomatic means of resolving disputes which inevitably arise due to human nature itself. But peace has never been something you get for free. It requires constant, laborious efforts https://t.co/TKAatZZzWY | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#DreamofMorgan Thank you Morgan for sharing your memorable experience in China. Hope more SA friends can visit China and get first-hand understanding of Chinese culture and people.
https://t.co/P6PcQfsyus | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation express their regret over the US decision to withdraw from the #OpenSkiesTreaty. This step could seriously damage the architecture of European security and the system of agreements on #armscontrol:
✈️ https://t.co/tBHwxiCSgh🇧🇾🇷🇺 https://t.co/Z5C5FzndhM | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
American anti-Chinese propaganda blows back on #Disney https://t.co/59dA2NFHBu | F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
So good to talk with Jordanian Foreign Minister @AymanHsafadi today. Thankful for Jordan’s help repatriating U.S. citizens and its pledge to send the U.S. needed medical supplies. We value our deep partnership with Jordan and its continued commitment to regional stability. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Vice FM Luo Zhaohui & newly appointed Assistant FM Deng Li met #ASEAN countries' ambassadors to #China on 4/9. Vice Minister Luo affirmed that China will work closely with ASEAN to showcase solidarity, cooperation & development at the upcoming ASEAN Post Ministerial Conference. https://t.co/IEi4gOz2HA | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#US has been threatening others not to do business with #Huawei for national security reasons. After failing to provide any evidence, they now turn to human rights. The biggest HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSER is using human rights as an excuse to repress a Chinese company. How ironic! https://t.co/HakdBLfVZ5 | C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Telephone conversation with President of France Emmanuel Macron: #Victory75, coronavirus response, developments in Ukraine and Libya https://t.co/ZEsfVYVBpP | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Pleased to meet with Japanese Foreign Minister @moteging and @MOFAkr_eng Minister Kang Kyung-wha today in California to discuss our trilateral cooperation. The U.S.-#ROK- #Japan security relationship is integral to peace and prosperity in the #IndoPacific. https://t.co/FdeKphecSc | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The one-China principle is the political foundation and fundamental premise for the establishment and development of diplomatic relations between China and the US. No one should underestimate China's firm determination to safeguard national sovereignty and territorial integrity. https://t.co/xRnA17DHo3 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
💬 #Zakharova: We believe the only reasonable & justified step would be to jointly search for a mutually acceptable solution to the current situation via political & diplomatic means. Russia is open to equal and constructive work to strengthen international security and stability https://t.co/KJvwopfXEZ | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Fine traditions shall be preserved and passed on from generations to generations. #China #culture #TraditionNeverGraduates https://t.co/Vfg9XHjxXq | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Are you ready for @galway2020? 🇮🇪
The European Capital of Culture will officially kick off tomorrow with an opening ceremony setting the city on 🔥
Find out more and join in! ⮕
https://t.co/peDcESZr9Y
#ECOC #EuropeForCulture https://t.co/xWIPn5hlse | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Medical supplies from China were delivered to Moldova on a Russian aircraft. Only by joining each other, we can battle #COVID19. https://t.co/oahU1MCv6X | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Handover the first batch of Emergency Supplies from the Chinese Government to Uganda Government, Solidarity stands as the key to our victory against the COVID-19.@JaneRuth_Aceng @MinofHealthUG @cidcaofficial https://t.co/z49L96tAk1 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
I share @SecPompeo’s admiration for Alice’s dedication to our mission, her achievements leading the South & Central Asia bureau at @StateDept and her unwavering support for American diplomats in the field. She was a great partner on the peace process & I wish her all the best. https://t.co/5V4GY101Yc | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
General #Haftar sends a letter to Vladimir Putin supporting Russian efforts to find a peaceful solution to #Libya conflict and expressing willingness to visit Moscow once again https://t.co/LtWhNCIaU0 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🎨 #OTD in 1930, Ilya Glazunov, #Russian artist from #SaintPetersburg, was born. His works follow historic & religious themes 🖌 Famous paintings include #Russia the Eternal, The 20th Century Mystery & illustrations to the works of Fyodor #Dostoyevsky 🔗 https://t.co/uHWb3bcLnj https://t.co/5pGAlAMD0T | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The #US attempt to contain China's development is doomed to failure. China opposes the abuse of state power by the US to suppress its companies and will take necessary measures to protect its interests. https://t.co/1DuRKSO6T4 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🇪🇺 European history is a shared heritage: it should unite rather than divide.
Speaking to students at #ParallelHistories event, Ambassador @stephanecrouzat reminds that following a 🇫🇷 proposal, the Observatory on History Teaching in Europe will be launched soon! @francediplo_EN https://t.co/Py7VmV45gs | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
As the largest developing country and a major responsible country, China has long maintained good cooperation with the WFP, and actively provided assistance within its capacity to the WFP to support its humanitarian assistance programs and improve global food security. https://t.co/CLN4rLiuhj | B appeal to commonality - flag waving |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The US & #Iceland are strong Allies & Arctic partners. Our shared history & core values of freedom, democracy, human rights, gender equality, diversity & liberty are the ties that bind our two great nations. Below is the Air Force strategy to preserve our peace & stability.🇺🇸🇮🇸 https://t.co/q7bCvhVVdU | A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
A pleasure hosting Ambassador Jorge Argüello @StateDept yesterday. The U.S. and Argentina look forward to continuing to work together to promote democracy and economic prosperity in the region. https://t.co/5e9TmHSZOl | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Did you know the EU space programme helps us fight climate change and land planes safely?
Read more in our #EUspace blog post!
https://t.co/xZNu0OaBdx | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture has a new online portal designed to help individuals, families, and #communities talk about racial identity, #racism, and the way these forces shape aspects of #culture https://t.co/3kKvqt5o98 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Russian Deputy Foreign Minister:
This is just a deliberate distortion of our position.
Latest example of #disinformation campaign by the #US. https://t.co/UKLnphuHZw | F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Meanwhile, the #US gov is "of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%." This is NOT #democracy. | M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The @StateDept's Global Engagement Center released a ground-breaking report focused on Russian proxy websites that spread disinformation and propaganda. Exposing this ecosystem of lies is an important step toward countering the threats Russia poses.
https://t.co/miJkl2PIaJ | M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🗓️ May 3 was declared #WorldPressFreedomDay by the #UNGA in 1993. #Russia highly values freedom of speech and the #media as a fundamental and integral element of democracy and an open civil society
🔗 https://t.co/13iZ2SvRLn
#FreedomOfSpeech https://t.co/Bgm1PSPWRR | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#EuropeDay message from the Finnish Ambassador to the UK @FinlandinUK
#1minute4EU #StrongerTogether https://t.co/3DITEH7OaF | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Celebrating what unites us — EU leaders highlight our commitment to international cooperation and solidarity for a more peaceful, just and sustainable future for all people & our planet.
Happy #UN75! https://t.co/KoFDz1vlQC | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The EU calls for the immediate release of #YuWensheng, sentenced to 4 years' imprisonment, as well as other detained/convicted human rights lawyers & defenders.
We expect China to uphold its obligations under national & international law. #EU4HumanRights
https://t.co/h2pf3pp4fw https://t.co/lZJwwFvPHZ | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🇷🇺 President #Putin visited Moscow's Kommunarka Infectious Diseases Hospital, assessed conditions and coronavirus patients' treatment:
💬 I would like to thank all medical personnel 😷 who are hard at work helping people in the best traditions of Russian medicine. https://t.co/5gIZkURxa3 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Our EU declaration following the developments around #Varosha. As EU, we support the speedy resumption of negotiations, under the auspices of the @UN, and we remain fully committed to a comprehensive settlement of the Cyprus problem within the UN framework https://t.co/LyZVy1XXxv | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The World Health Organization "said in January that COVID-19 could not be spread by human-to-human contact, and praised China’s response to the virus,” Fred Lucas reports.
President @realDonaldTrump is holding WHO accountable.
News of the day: https://t.co/DaQTQQYSok https://t.co/CTxZY4K2i5 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Just out of curiosity-what do our US colleagues view as“propaganda-filled”part of our draft? If alleviation of suffering of #Syria population is propaganda to you and you promote enrichment of terrorist groups in #Idlib instead, you should say it bluntly and not hide in edits! https://t.co/KjIetLPFug | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Telephone conversation with President of the United States Donald Trump: #Victory75, oil market developments, coronavirus response https://t.co/LILlKWtjuj | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Nationwide, the percentage of Coronavirus tests that come back positive has declined very significantly.
In New York, new cases are down 50%, and fatalities are down 40%. https://t.co/Gv6qgXdFWM | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
We welcome @USTreasury sanctions against Belarusian regime officials for their roles in the fraudulent Aug. 9 presidential election and the violent crackdown that followed. The U.S. will use all tools at our disposal to hold accountable all who seek to undermine democracy. https://t.co/JojXWrbn92 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
.@SecPompeo: “President Trump is delivering on the pledge that he made the day after Iran attacked American forces in Iraq." https://t.co/DDLukxBaEa | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Only with such cooperation could our countries welcome home each of our citizens. Thank you to all who made such reunions possible. #AmericansHome https://t.co/WGmtryqlx2 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Rt: I’ve just been thinking about it since a lot of people tested negative for the flu and there wasn’t a test for COVID-19 yet. Obviously it’s serious either way and please stay home/wash your hands/stop panic buying the toilet paper/etc. https://t.co/cwFhWeYbkM | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#OTD in 1756 Russian🎭Theatre of tragedies&comedies, future Alexandrinsky Theatre was founded in #StPetersburg
☝️It's the oldest national theater in #Russia-the premieres of almost all Russian classical plays were here
Its building-a real masterpiece-is protected by @UNESCO_es https://t.co/tzbny62tYU | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The 🇺🇸 is at half mast at my residence & U.S. Embassy Kigali in memory of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. RIP RBG https://t.co/EfLJFAmsQw | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🇷🇺🇭🇳 On September 15, the Central American state of #Honduras celebrates its #Independence Day. Our countries have established good relations of friendship, partnership and understanding. https://t.co/qBPtLEwml0 #Russia #LatinAmerica https://t.co/SMeehgbCrg | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
On April 24 the famous Swiss mountain Matterhorn was lit up with the colours of the Russian flag as a message of support and solidarity with Russia in our common fight against the spread of COVID-19.
© Light Art by Gerry Hofstetter / Foto Michael Portmann https://t.co/brNzAQSn6j | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Major developments in trade cooperation between China and the Arab States have been made in recent years. China has also been the largest trading partner of Saudi Arabia and Egypt for several consecutive years, statistics from the Ministry of Commerce showed. #CIIE #BeltandRoad https://t.co/mzX8lbaOlq | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Oswaldo Paya led a principled & peaceful movement for democracy, freedom of speech & respect for human rights in Cuba. Today, 8 years after Paya was killed, the U.S. continues to support his vision for a free Cuba. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Happy #WorldArtDay 🎨🥁!
Especially in times of crisis, such as #Covid19, art can help us cope and enrich the days spent inside 🎼📚
👇🏿Here you can find 7 free ways to enjoy & explore European culture from your🛋️
https://t.co/AJHytpbGfk
#CreativeEuropeAtHome #EuropeforCulture | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Many thanks to @FP_Champagne for a fruitful 🇪🇺🇨🇦 virtual ministerial meeting today. Our friendship and partnership is strong. EU & Canada will continue to show leadership and work together to strengthen multilateralism and global responses to the many challenges we face https://t.co/WUB3kuSpgt | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The Chinese and Nepali workers are doing great jobs in Narayanghat-Butwal Road Improvement Project and Hongshi-Shivam Cement. Keep working hard for the local development and prosperity! https://t.co/vf5Zg0IaON | B appeal to commonality - flag waving |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
MFA spox #Zakharova: Under no circumstances has Russia planned to send its troops to #Afghanistan nor does it intend to do so. There is expanded cooperation in fighting terrorism and drug trafficking through military-technical sphere and training skilled specialists. https://t.co/ONW9CGx5Fj | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Honoured to present my letter of credentials to H.E. U Win Myint, President of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar and to contribute to the #EU increasing engagement in #Myanmar. Our partnership will continue to work for a sustainable future for the people of Myanmar. https://t.co/nqPIzoL7vL | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Back in Vienna! Congratulations on the first successful flight of the Chinese-Austrian air bridge for medical supplies. Highly appreciate the close & efficient cooperation of all work teams of the 2 countries! China & Austria stand together against #COVID19. https://t.co/T0jicKPHCF | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The United States has a long history of providing aid to countries in times of need. #OTD 72 years ago, the #USA launched the Marshall Plan, which included over $12 billion in aid to rebuild war-torn countries in Western Europe. #AllTogether https://t.co/zYiHBXya6k | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
With European & US tech visionaries who invent the future of human-centered economies here in #SanFrancisco. Their ideas & funds can generate thousands of jobs & improve lives. They exemplify how our scientific ties & common values strengthen both EU&US working together. #EUandCA https://t.co/QYLNzn3NqA | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#Footage Currently processed: 29 buildings and structures, more than 119,000 square meters of internal premises. 13,000 square meters of roads @rusembitaly #RussiaItaly #MilitaryDoctors #Bergamo #Lombardia #CBRDefence #COVID19 #FightingCoronavirus https://t.co/wq9BIICAmg | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
R.I.P. Stephen F. Cohen, professor emeritus of Russian Studies and Politics at NYU and Princeton.
@Russia lost one of its true friends in the U.S. Read his article from 2018:
▪️ https://t.co/iszU2Boj8i 🇺🇸🇷🇺 https://t.co/cZSCL5rqRq | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🇷🇺🇨🇺 Sergey #Lavrov and Foreign Minister of Cuba @BrunoRguezP: #Russia and #Cuba are optimistic about the future of bilateral relations, continue to work to protect their sovereignty, independence and the right to control their own future. 🔗 Full article: https://t.co/MrL7OLPoQT https://t.co/T23KFodw2M | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🇷🇺🇸🇾 🤝 #Russia's FM Sergey #Lavrov & President of #Syria Bashar al-Assad hold talks in Damascus.
📸 #HappeningRightNow https://t.co/NLxGSp17qh | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Russia continues to undermine international norms in Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula. We call on Russia and its proxies to immediately release all Ukrainians it unjustly holds, end its abuses on the peninsula, and return full control of Crimea to Ukraine. #CrimeaisUkraine https://t.co/lHWC4Pv7xh | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The China threat theory is a fake proposition. For 40 years, China has never participated in any war. China adheres to the peaceful rise, abides by the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence, never engage in hegemonism, and does not threaten any country. A great noble country! | B appeal to commonality - flag waving |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
You forgot to mention, Mr Secretary of state, that harassing other states, meddling and imposing on them US vision of their future since 1898 has also become part of US #UnalienableRights. That’s how progressive ideas are easily transformed in repressive reality! https://t.co/nopj0hwe66 | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.