text
stringlengths 524
26.6k
| response
stringlengths 0
389
|
|---|---|
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The traditional friendship between China and Africa has withstood the test of history and changes in the international situation, is rock-solid and unbreakable, and will definitely not be affected by a single incident or the instigation of some forces. https://t.co/o7yljhJ614 | M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The actions we have taken are RECIPROCAL and for self-defense. They are in response to US unwarranted suppression of Chinese media agencies. We urge the US side to immediately change course, undo the damage, and stop the bullying behaviors.
https://t.co/VfSebhjf2Q | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
China has won the battle against #COVID19. The huge music festival in Wuhan reflects how effective China’s response to #COVID19 is. I hope you could show this real image of China to the world through your lenses.
https://t.co/0fEOJawY78 | M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
A European Green Deal that works for our 🌍planet and for you!
Next week, we will present the first 🇪🇺 EU-wide Climate Law, which will set down our target to become climate-neutral by 2050. → https://t.co/70kcvuhckq
#EUGreenDeal https://t.co/bW5QqZNUEy | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The @nytimes article insouciantly shared by some Indian media about Russia allegedly offering bounties to Afghan militants for killing coalition forces is a #fake demonstrating low intellectual abilities of US intelligence propagandists - @mfa_russia
https://t.co/gwYfUiJzQW https://t.co/boC6Pnp9KA | F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Spoke this morning with Lebanese Prime Minister Hassan Diab to express my deepest condolences in the wake of the horrible explosion in Beirut. The U.S. stands in solidarity with the Lebanese people and remains committed to assist with the aftermath of this terrifying event. | M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#COVID19 | Protecting #publichealth stays the top priority.
⚕️ EU #Health ministers met today and reiterated their commitment in:
🤝 strengthening solidarity & cooperation
ℹ️ exchanging information in order to best protect EU citizens.
#EPSCO #coronavirus | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Saddened by the crash of Ukraine International Airlines flight PS752. I extend my deepest condolences to the families of the victims. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The President held a meeting on measures to fight the spread of the coronavirus in Russia https://t.co/dq1bjJNlB1 https://t.co/yHmM0oPnUp | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The #NextGenerationEU proposes to expand and strengthen the EU Civil Protection Mechanism to prepare for and respond to future crises.
▶️ Watch the press conference by @JanezLenarcic on #rescEU and humanitarian aid in the next #EUbudget. https://t.co/Qc7Khju7LS | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
To celebrate Filipino American History Month this October, we are using the hashtag #MyFilAmStory to share the stories of Filipino Americans who are responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. https://t.co/1S1WTvsCp6 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
.@EU_Commission will closely monitor, in a spirit of cooperation, the application of emergency measures in all Member States. We all need to work together to master this crisis. On this path, we'll uphold our European values & human rights. This is who we are & what we stand for. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🔸#Russian Deputy Foreign Minister & Ambassador of the Republic of #Turkey to the Russian Federation had a substantive exchange of opinions on the situation in the #Libyan peace settlement.
🔗https://t.co/wk5IEwFql4 https://t.co/6wdndCwADt | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#Victory75
The capture of Bratislava 75 years ago #OTD opened a direct route for the #RedArmy to Prague. After a deep maneuver Soviet troops attacked the Nazis from the north-west #WWII
Moscow is celebrating the anniversary of the Slovak capital's liberation with a firework🎇 https://t.co/Vi8zPZ2GdI | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Resolution 2758 adopted by UNGA in October 1971 recognized PRC as the only legitimate representative of China in the UN. This has long resolved once & for all China's representation in the UN politically, legally & in terms of procedures. UNGA resolutions must be upheld. https://t.co/TDxHcJjz2x | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🚢⚓️On May 13 Russia celebrates the “Black Sea Fleet Day”. #OTD in 1783, 11 ships of the Azov Flotilla entered Akhtiar (now - Sevastopol) Harbour, a direct result of Crimea’s accession to the Russian Empire. Today the Fleet consists of more than 280 vessels, including 55 warships https://t.co/O8fdMU5T7k | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Great news for the #WesternBalkans & the EU. I'm delighted that Member States gave green light to start accession talks with 🇦🇱Albania & 🇲🇰North Macedonia. Hope EU leaders endorse this week. The future of the Western Balkans lies in the🇪🇺. Congrats to @ediramaal & @o_spasovski. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
I briefed China's experience, China-Nepal and China-SAARC cooperation on fighting against COVID-19 in the interview of ABC Television. Watch the full video:
https://t.co/HCGzyvTT81 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
It is a matter of principle. History has proven and will continue to prove that China will never compromise its own sovereignty and national security. https://t.co/nolW7uolA1 | A appeal to commonality - ad populum |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
💬 #Lavrov: #Russia is chairing the #CSTO this year. The dynamics of the situation confirmed the need for creating a response to the threats of biological #security and developing cooperation in our common epidemiological space. https://t.co/jhKJASwlgu #COVID19 #coronavirus https://t.co/pZxPW5wPF8 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
An important, emotional day today in #Lesvos. We honoured the emergency responders, our EU Agencies and UN teams working on the ground. Discussed with vulnerable groups and local authorities. #Moria is the Europe we need to change. High time for a truly European Migration Policy. https://t.co/imn1eLMbEb | M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Heartfelt thanks for the solidarity from #Tbilisi and #Batumi with EU countries hit by #covid-19.
We will only get through this by everybody working together. #strongertogether #stopcovid https://t.co/VLafweHlHg | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The farmers are really happy with the new China Trade Deal and the soon to be signed deal with Mexico and Canada, but I hope the thing they will most remember is the fact that I was able to take massive incoming Tariff money and use it to help them get through the tough times! | B appeal to commonality - flag waving
M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Tonight in ‘Global Conversation’ with @euronews on opening European tourism and travel sectors, kickstarting the economy and the future EU Asylum and Migration Pact. Full interview 👉 https://t.co/iLCgD9odsE | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
China-US relationship bears on not only the interests of the Chinese and American peoples, but also the future of the world and humanity. China, with goodwill and sincerity, remains willing to grow China-US ties. https://t.co/Dn1ugxV3r0 | B appeal to commonality - flag waving |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
China firmly opposes and strongly condemns the so-called Hong Kong Autonomy Act and related sanctions. We have lodged solemn representations. If the US is bent on going the wrong way, China will take resolute countermeasures to defend national sovereignty and security interests. https://t.co/NJBlo8bczY | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
❗ The #US is illegally occupying territories in the northeast & south of #Syria. It is taking part in robbing & illegally trading in the country’s natural resources that are the asset of all #Syrians. We are seriously concerned about these illegal actions https://t.co/IasgfWqk17 https://t.co/DDZ6cjVDYU | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
💬 #Zakharova: #Russia as a nation and co-chair of the @OSCE Minsk Group continues to make active mediation efforts towards the cessation of hostilities in and around #NagornoKarabakh and the resumption of the peace process without delay. https://t.co/D4QRJmgacZ | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
❗️ Russian Foreign Minister Sergey #Lavrov: "The #SCO’s firm stand is that it should be a fair & democratic world based on respect for sovereignty & territorial integrity of all states".
🔗 For more: https://t.co/qB22pEngPz https://t.co/8HVBjDQzK1 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
💬 #Zakharova: In these challenging times, #Russia will continue supporting the government and people of #Belarus, our closest strategic ally 🇷🇺🇧🇾 https://t.co/09M0ve3r5D | M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Viacheslav Volodin: Scientific, technical and innovative areas, issues of the digital economy, artificial intelligence technologies, personal data protection will be the main priorities of inter-parliamentary cooperation between #Russia and #China.
🔗https://t.co/zW9mtCEuRm https://t.co/7Uf0oQJtJO | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Impressed by the Chinese government's policies that have helped enterprises to resume operations, Swedish medical equipment producer @Elekta has reaffirmed its determination to pursue long-term development in China, said Gong Anming, president of Elekta China. #CIIE https://t.co/a2lhT3SToN | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
It was a pleasure to welcome @sardesairajdeep to the U.S. Embassy today to hear about his new book as well as his insights on both the history and future of India. #CulturalDiplomacy https://t.co/5lNQr8nDNl | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Russia’s #BRICS Sherpa Sergey #Ryabkov: Promotion of cooperation within #BRICS is one of the priorities of Russian foreign policy. BRICS was created over 10 years ago, upon Russia’s initiative, and today it is undoubtedly an integral element of international architecture https://t.co/bdSVAYwnc6 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Pleased to be back in Riyadh to discuss the U.S. government’s strong commitment to #SaudiArabia’s security and the continued need to stand together to counter #Iran’s malign behavior in the region. https://t.co/rveIIBNgK3 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Russia is directing coronavirus-related disinformation at Eastern European audiences in a bid to drive anti-NATO sentiment among virus-spooked populations. Read this article to know what tactics the Kremlin uses to plant a false narrative:
https://t.co/kMXdzgGVJl https://t.co/qT9rg9BDQm | F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Congratulations to our friends and colleagues from #Belarus on the Day of Unity between the Peoples of Russia and Belarus. #OTD in 1997 the Treaty on Establishing the #UnionState of 🇷🇺and🇧🇾 was signed. https://t.co/XAFakNunpA | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The new report aims to enlarge the existing EU toolbox and kick-start an inclusive debate and rule of law culture across the EU.
It shows how the rule of law can be further strengthened in full respect of national constitutional systems and traditions.
#RuleofLaw https://t.co/36YFZfAmlS | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The United States is enhancing women’s participation in political processes, peace efforts, and peace operations by strengthening UN Security Council peacekeeping mission mandates and advocating for gender analysis in mission reporting. #WPSinAction https://t.co/GOtN2tmKTq https://t.co/aJEfEqSjCH | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
We cannot change history, but the lessons of history can change us #HolocaustRemembranceDay
All EU Member States stand united in the determination that any form of racism, antisemitism and hatred have no place in Europe. #WeRemember
https://t.co/7r4ag6Bncu https://t.co/2oadmA2LUv | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Once again, Democrat leaders have made their radical disregard for the U.S. Constitution crystal clear.
Full opening statement from @PressSec: https://t.co/fvdCFBxP4s | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
“The President has been targeted by Twitter.” @MariaBartiromo What about all of the lies and fraudulent statements made by Adam Schiff, and so many others, on the Russian Witch Hunt Plus, Plus, Plus? What about China’s propaganda? WHO’s mistakes? No flags? @foxandfriends | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
It’s the third time in a week that Secretary Pompeo smears China, but he cannot fool people that easily. We urge him to stop attacking China’s political system or obstructing exchange & cooperation between China and the US. | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Operation #IRINI inspects the collaborative #MV MEDKON SINOP in application of the #UN #Armsembargo on #Libya. The #boardingteam of the 🇫🇷#French Frigate #LatoucheTréville examined documentation and cargo. Nothing suspicious was found. The complete news 👉 https://t.co/AsHrnpe5KV https://t.co/nyk0ggTkoX | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Concluded good and constructive #FAC.
Eastern Med: Full solidarity w/ Greece&Cyprus; calling Turkey for immediate deescalation and reengaging in dialogue.
Belarus: EU doesn't accept election results. Work begins on sanctioning those responsible for violence & falsification. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The European Capitals of Culture are Rijeka🇭🇷 & Galway🇮🇪.
Rijeka, the first-ever 🇭🇷city to hold the title, with the motto ‘Port of Diversity' focusing on water, work & migration.
Galway will explore its language & landscape & "let the magic in". https://t.co/t1KaR1pfGv | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
This is baseless. It's not the West but the Chinese people made China rich. China benefits a lot from the current world economic and political order which China supports. But those outdated and undemocractic ones must be reformed. China has no intention to replace the West. https://t.co/XuNBhogars | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Foreign Minister Wang Yi spoke with French counterpart Le Drian. Wang said,the international community should support WHO, rise above differences in ideology, social system, bloc or domestic politics. To support WHO is to save more lives & pool global synergy in battling #COVID19 https://t.co/bPCZAHzfzr | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
.@SecPompeo "Six years on, Russia continues to rely on lies and disinformation in its failed attempt to legitimize the illegitimate. Its efforts are doomed to failure. The world will never forget Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine."
Full Statement: https://t.co/N6dYeiJTeM | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Being the first country to sign the #UN Charter 75 years ago, China remains committed to the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, and stands ready to work with other countries to uphold the international system with the UN at its core. https://t.co/QiADEaL0Za | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
After #Salisbury incident UK used #highlylikely terminology to trick its Western partners into actions against Russia, promising soon to finish investigation and present evidence. Two years on London still has not presented anything. #Navalny case seems to follow suit. https://t.co/wd1uzJmedE | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Today we are presenting our European Vaccine Strategy. Joint action at EU level will increase the chance of finding a vaccine and secure necessary volumes at a good price in the EU and beyond. We need to act very quickly - in overcoming this pandemic every day matters. https://t.co/LOy9iDYwNQ | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
China firmly supports Serbia in the fight against the #COVID19 . In a message to Serbian President @avucic , President Xi said that 🇨🇳 will provide assistance of protective gears & medical equipment to 🇷🇸 and send a 👩⚕️ team as well: https://t.co/AqHS1F3OYN https://t.co/3gRKTZVbNl | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The Council today faced incredible disgrace when US, UK and other Western countries shamelessly tried to shut the mouth of former #OPCW Director General Jose #Bustani. This is a clear proof of how they in reality “care” for the truth and transparency #Syria #DoubleStandards https://t.co/0PMB3Iyg04 | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🇪🇺🚂🇹🇷 Head of the EU Delegation to Turkey Ambassador Christian Berger & the EU Ambassadors are on the second day of the trip on the Eastern Express Train organized in the framework of EU-Turkey Cooperation in the Transport Sector! Today the Ambassadors started the day in Sivas. https://t.co/OJsK0xinmU | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
EU measures over illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol in facts & figures #crimeaisukraine 👇
https://t.co/XMpaXsERgn https://t.co/794JsmqcNt | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Joint exercise of EU Naval Force ATALANTA together with South Korea and Japan to protect vessels, deter and disrupt piracy and robbery at sea and monitor fishing activities off the coast of Somalia. A practical example of multilateralism. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
When President Trump calls the Coronavirus response a “whole-of-America” effort, he means it.
Unprecedented public-private partnerships forged since January—on travel screenings, insurance coverage, testing access, & more—are protecting our communities from this global outbreak. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The aim of Operation #Irini is to enforce the UN arms embargo and to contribute to a sustainable ceasefire in Libya.
#EUdefence
On my blog:
https://t.co/qOA7XfoBWR https://t.co/qvODHVnppu | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
.@realDonaldTrump just secured #PhaseOne of the #China trade deal. That’s a huge win — we welcome more of it. | M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Amb. Wang Ke discusses with Mama Elizabeth Mahiga about future plan of Iringa Learning Centre in Ugwachanya, the legacy of former Foreign Minister Dr. Augustine Mahiga, built with the funds from Chinese Embassy. The centre aims at empowering local youth by vocational training. https://t.co/ZoVQPB9HmG | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
LIVE: Press Briefing with Coronavirus Task Force https://t.co/70pZUDf7KU | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🔎”75 years ago, on August 15, 1945, Japan announced its surrender to the Allied Forces, bringing an end to the deadliest war in human history – World War II. The U.S. suffered 426,000 casualties in the Pacific Theater, including 161,000 dead... 👉🏼🖥 📺https://t.co/MSfMytW82J https://t.co/YP98vkYvt0 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🇪🇺🇺🇬 #DidYouKnow that the EU is not only the 1st trading partner of Uganda but also its most balanced one? All products of 🇺🇬 origin (except for arms) can enter 🇪🇺 market duty free, quota free because Uganda is a beneficiary of the EU #EverythingbutArms initiative! #EUandUganda https://t.co/zBr0UAT48P | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
During his speech to the UN General Assembly President Mnangagwa restated his commitment to fostering democracy, human rights and rule of law. We are listening and watching for action. https://t.co/aCJV5OrJJb | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
On September 17th, the United States joined 16 other @OSCE members to invoke the “Moscow Mechanism” to establish an impartial Mission to look into the continued crackdown in Belarus. Our goal remains a peaceful resolution that supports democracy in Belarus. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The Chinese Communist Party’s reckless economic policies and its ruthless suppression of environmental activists have resulted in China’s environmental disasters. The world cannot afford the CCP model of economic development. | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The European Union launched today the #TeamEurope package to support partner countries with more than €20 billion - to win the fight against the #coronavirus together with united, swift & global actions. A global pandemic can only be solved globally. https://t.co/gStVRQ5vAL | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering Wang Junzhi:
Chinese researchers have submitted rolling applications for conducting human clinical trials on vaccine, and will launch clinical trials after gaining approval.
https://t.co/mOBnqmu8e6 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
In a phone conversation with US President Donald Trump, Chinese President Xi Jinping underscored that the China-US relationship has reached an important juncture. As cooperation benefits both sides and confrontation hurts both, the former remains the only correct choice. https://t.co/ELwGIc1frm | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
....Democrats talking point is that we are doing badly. If the virus disappeared tomorrow, they would say we did a really poor, and even incompetent, job. Not fair, but it is what it is. So far, by the way, we have not had one death. Let’s keep it that way! | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The @UN banned Soleimani from traveling outside #Iran in 2015. In December, the UN Secretary-General @antonioguterres asked countries to "diligently implement restrictive measures” on Soleimani. So why was Soleimani in #Iraq? https://t.co/2wu1PQxIAx | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Today Ukraine celebrates #EuropeDay. 🇪🇺 remains Ukraine’s most devoted partner & will continue to unwaveringly support 🇺🇦 politically & its reform path. We will see the end of current challenging times together, growing #strongertogether, #movingforwardtogether! Happy Europe Day! https://t.co/oLdAgN6paL | M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
.@MoD_Russia: Four terrorists die in explosion of chlorine warehouse near #Idlib. They had been preparing another chemical attack to frame Syrian govt. #Syria https://t.co/hmPj9okJeV | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Dr Zhong Nanshan shared China's experience and practices against #COVID19 through a webinar with representatives of foreign missions in China. Together we will fight the virus. https://t.co/iq4YsrwpZm | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The CIIE-themed “Jinbo Hao” aircraft global tour made a stop in Tokyo today! Japan is China’s fourth largest trade partner. Japan’s direct #investment in #China in 2019 hit $110 billion and the two sides are expanding their #cooperation. #FlywithCIIE @ChnEmbassy_jp https://t.co/mxBi6lO7sS | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The United States condemns the PRC proposal to impose national security legislation on Hong Kong and strongly urges Beijing to reconsider. We stand with the people of Hong Kong. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei #Ryabkov: “The U.S. is clearly an entity that stands for itself, one that creates uncertainty for the world. America is a source of trouble for many international actors” #Geopolitics #Trump #diplomacy #Russia https://t.co/JielV9aS4n | C discrediting the opponent - name calling |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The worst massacre on European soil since World War II unfolded 25 yrs ago-the genocide in Srebrenica. We failed to protect those most in need. While we mourn the lives lost, now more than ever, let’s speak out & act against injustice & violence in the pretext of race & religion. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🇷🇺🇮🇷 In #Moscow, a meeting is taking place between Sergey #Lavrov and Foreign Minister of the Islamic Republic of #Iran Mohammad Javad Zarif @JZarif. #Russia #RussiaIran https://t.co/dKIjcGfO10 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Economic globalization is a trend of history and China will not stop pursuing higher-quality opening-up, said Vice Premier Han Zheng at the @wef in #Davos : https://t.co/oRJ4HzNaqf #Davos2020 #Davos20 https://t.co/DO13TS29Nx | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
President #Putin: According to @WFP, over 9 million Syrians, which is a half of the population, need food aid. Despite that & UN Secretary-General’s appeal to ease the sanctions under the pandemic, Washington & Brussels made the decision to extend the restrictions against #Syria https://t.co/htoNQtc7Ih | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
China-Africa cooperation is not exclusive. African countries have a say over which country is truly promoting African people’s welfare. We want to remind Mr. Pompeo vilifying China & poisoning China-Africa relations won’t succeed and won’t make America great again. https://t.co/cyejhVNo8A | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
US officials said they offered $100 million to China and other countries. We thank the American people for their kind help. But as a matter of fact, we haven’t received $1 from the US government. By the way, has the US paid its dues to WHO? | K discrediting the opponent - doubt |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
⚔️ On 8 July 1709 🇷🇺 Russian forces under Tsar Peter the Great defeated the heretofore unbeatable Swedish Army of Charles XII in the historic Battle of #Poltava – many say Russian Empire was born #OTD while oathbreakers like #Mazepa found themselves «on the wrong side of history» https://t.co/TmhIb30TnM | B appeal to commonality - flag waving
M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Today is International Day of #Multilateralism & #Diplomacy for Peace, established by a UNGA Resolution on 12/12/2018 to promote all initiatives for peaceful resolution of all conflicts. #Russia welcomes this initiative as reflecting the emergence of a multipolar world https://t.co/eZYECLnuH1 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The US @StateDept’s statement on #SouthChinaSea deliberately distorts the facts and international law including #UNCLOS, exaggerates the situation in the region & attempts to sow discord btw #China and other littoral countries. We are firmly opposed to it. https://t.co/jDa3v1bX3I https://t.co/VAr9dHqTRz | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
All countries must stay on the right path to move forward with solidarity. Every country's future is increasingly interconnected. A recent poll by the #UN shows that 87 percent of those surveyed believe that #COVID19 has made international cooperation all the more imperative. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
With fraternal African countries fight the epidemic together, China will hold a video conference with countries including Somalia to share the experience of fighting the epidemic. The epidemic is the common enemy of mankind. As long as we unite, we will finally defeat it.#Somalia https://t.co/XVG4SjUr4b | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Something on, @galway2020? 👀
Galway is the 3rd 🇮🇪 city to hold the European Capital of Culture title (after Dublin in 1991 & Cork in 2005).
Through culture & art, Capitals of Culture aim to improve the quality of life in the cities and strengthen their sense of community. 💫 https://t.co/bW9MFu8iFo | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
On May 14, 2018, President @realDonaldTrump fulfilled his promise to officially open the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem, Israel. The Department recognizes today’s two-year anniversary as a testament to our unbreakable bond, rooted in shared traditions of freedom & equality. https://t.co/IgvzxlaYaz | M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
So glad to know that all the Nepali nationals returned from Wuhan have been tested negative for #COVID19 and will reunite with their families. Nepal is a truly blessed country!🙏🙏🙏
https://t.co/YhPDkDUM1Z | M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
China & US reacted differently to #COVID19. China put life first, suspended economic activities, followed WHO advice & stopped the virus. US prioritized political gains, downplayed #COVID19, ignored science, shifted blames, hurt people's health & economy.
https://t.co/wC6145Jq5m | B appeal to commonality - flag waving
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The EU and Canada are two likeminded partners, ready to tackle the existing global challenges through cooperation and multilateral approach.
President @vonderleyen and @eucopresident Michel spoke with Prime Minister of Canada @JustinTrudeau at the EU-Canada virtual meeting. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
It does not affect the high degree of autonomy in Hong Kong. It does not affect the rights and freedoms enjoyed by Hong Kong residents. And it does not affect the legitimate rights and interests of foreign investors in Hong Kong. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
President #Putin on the value of Victory in the Great Patriotic War: If we had surrendered our cities without a fight, to spare our soldiers’ lives, we would have eventually lost that war, which would have resulted in the total extermination of almost all the peoples of the USSR https://t.co/uECOHrgo7r | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The @StateDept's Global Engagement Center released a ground-breaking report focused on Russian proxy websites that spread disinformation and propaganda. Exposing this ecosystem of lies is an important step toward countering the threats Russia poses. https://t.co/yTrcqMKynN | M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
⚔️ On 17 July 1942 the Battle of #Stalingrad - largest armed clash in history - commenced with a monstrous Nazi offensive aimed at crushing 🟥 #RedArmy. Had it wavered, Nazism would have taken over the world.
❗ At #Stalingrad Soviet heroes won the battle & saved humanity 🙏 https://t.co/Nj3blTKALM | B appeal to commonality - flag waving
M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Today, the world showed extraordinary unity for the common good.
We have raised €7.4 billion ($8 billion) from donors worldwide during the Coronavirus #GlobalResponse pledging event.
The pledging marathon will continue.
#UnitedAgainstCoronavirus
https://t.co/2BJoJeS9pZ | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
A great pleasure to present Amb. Shivshankar Menon, former NSA and Foreign Secretary, an old friend of the Embassy, with the badge of Russian MFA “For the Contribution to International Cooperation”, acknowledging his efforts to strengthen partnership between Moscow & New Delhi! https://t.co/d5EKYZgknx | P not propaganda |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.