text
stringlengths 524
26.6k
| response
stringlengths 0
389
|
|---|---|
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
EU citizens in the UK now have fewer reasons to be worried after Brexit. Find out more about the reassurances the European Parliament obtained @ https://t.co/PnO1U5MFqW https://t.co/8zr24Tlh48 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Happy to convey the EU's strong support for @UN Development System reform, spearheaded by DSG @AminaJMohammed.
We want a UN that delivers and responds to peoples expectations. https://t.co/jbnXaU1Jew | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
On the #WorldDayforCulturalDiversity, #EU 🇪🇺 celebrates #Afghanculture - the vibrant heritage of centuries of diversity, plurality & unity. The tragedies of the past 40 years should not make forget that 🇦🇫 culture is first & foremost a #culture of #peace! 🎉👏🏻👏🏻
#Afghanistan | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The virus is ruthless, however, there is true love in the world. Many thanks to the friends from the Maldives. https://t.co/ivfMnVqHrC | M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The European Union Delegation met with #Pakistan Government partners from federal and provincial levels to discuss the EU's present and future development work with Pakistan. @AKaminara https://t.co/Bw5AS1dcsF | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#SYRIA | #Russia rejects any accusations by UN Commission of indiscriminate strikes. They are biased, made immediately after terrorists started offensive against #SAA in #Idlib. Obvious - no commission could get reliable info about situation on the ground➡️https://t.co/gbN5G3tTwe https://t.co/10IjpxS21V | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
At EU Foreign Ministers’ videoconference this afternoon representing @EU_Commission in discussions on #EU #US partnership, incl with @SecPompeo, and key foreign policy issues. #FAC https://t.co/ekYorixC3R | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
⛸️ Phenomenal 🇷🇺 Russian figure skating star, 🥇2018 Olympic & 2019 World champion, one of the two female athletes to win all major titiles Alina #Zagitova turns 1⃣8⃣ today! ☝️ In #Russia it is the age of majority.
🥳 Happy birthday Alina and many future successes 🙏 https://t.co/XmHlLcDJie | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
All Chinese, including HK citizens, strongly oppose and condemn #US sanctions and blatant interference in our internal affairs. The unyielding officials stated they're not afraid of sanctions. Intimidation won't work on China, but exposes US bullying and double standards. https://t.co/nLRijZiBDr | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Australia, an important eye of Five Eyes and a fervent intelligence gatherer, set up intel stations in China & bugged our Embassy. The US & its ally Australia are colluding to stage a farce of the spy crying "stop the spy". | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#OTD On 17 August 1970, 50 years ago, Soviet space probe “Venera-7” was launched. It became the first apparatus to transmit data from Venus following a rough landing on the planet. It confirmed that Venus was not suitable for space colonization #SpaceExploration #RussiaInSpace https://t.co/9SwK3MaF7m | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#Footage Russian military embarked on health facility disinfection in the #Brescia province, Italy. Yesterday, #CBRDefence detachments carried out sanitation of senior care centres in Orzinuovi, Orzivecchi and Barbariga https://t.co/xZBcTAhYhP #RussiaItaly #COVID19 @rusembitaly https://t.co/pi0whSsHD7 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
President Xi said China 🇨🇳 and the EU 🇪🇺 have to be two major forces for world peace and stability, two major markets for world development and prosperity & two major civilizations for upholding multilateralism and improving global governance. https://t.co/eNLpCRlqBU https://t.co/5cCCw8L88J | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Eight in ten Europeans support the concept that the EU should only provide funds to EU countries if they are in compliance with the rule of law and democratic principles.
MEPs are calling for a strong mechanism to ensure respect for the rule of law >> https://t.co/Ga5sCBO2af https://t.co/tC6jiX7Bmy | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The US and Greece reiterated their dedication to enhancing their close cooperation as @NATO Allies, using all appropriate means at their disposal, to safeguard stability and security in the wider region. The full joint statement here: https://t.co/Zi1gbQQHgt | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
We extend our warmest wishes to Ukraine on its Independence day. Europe is not complete without an independent Ukraine. Our partnership is strong. EU support for Ukraine’s independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity is unwavering. We #moveforwardtogether. https://t.co/OEdHt9TdR4 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
"Portugal is not only an example of how to find a way out of the #coronavirus crisis, with good ideas, hard work and discipline.
Portugal is also a role model for how to set the course for the future."
- President @vonderleyen on her first official visit to Portugal 🇵🇹 @CE_PTrep | B appeal to commonality - flag waving |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🇷🇺🇸🇸 #Russia contributes $ 1 million to @FAOSouthSudan to combat Desert Locust in #SouthSudan. The funds will be crucial in containing the spread of the insects and mitigating their impact on food security and livelihoods in South Sudan.
More ➡️ https://t.co/NzT4IzzAlA https://t.co/gVe7cKtlqM | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
At #EUCO the EU gave 3 strong messages:
▪️We support Belarusians
who want fundamental freedoms
& democracy.
▪️We will sanction all those responsible for violence, repression & falsification of election results.
▪️We will support peaceful democratic transition in Belarus. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Welcome to the new USA 🇺🇸 Ambassador to #Albania🇦🇱 H.E. Yuri Kim!
Ready to start working together to continue the fundamental EU-US partnership in Albania, in particular in the context of the country’s #EU🇪🇺 integration process.
2020 is a crucial year for the🇪🇺perspective of🇦🇱. https://t.co/DbCcQn4tvj | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Not only is today #WomensEqualityDay, but it also marks the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment to the United States Constitution, which granted some women the right to vote. Press ▶️ to see @USArmy Staff Sgt. Kayla Streeter’s military experience. https://t.co/RgElll3PLX | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Our 🇪🇺🇬🇧relationship is rooted in our shared values and interests that arise from geography, history and values anchored in our common European heritage. The economic, social and political relationship between the EU and the UK will not end. #NewBeginnings🇪🇺🇬🇧 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The United States' partnership with Mexico—which promotes economic growth, jobs, and prosperity for the American and Mexican people alike—was renewed and reaffirmed today at the White House! 🇺🇸 🇲🇽
1600 Daily: https://t.co/A68ueVC88u https://t.co/u5pJYsBy3z | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Today we celebrate the Slovenian Armed Forces. Slovenia is a strong #NATO Ally, and @Slovenskavojska has long been an excellent partner to the U.S. military. We look forward to increasing cooperation to meet our combined security goals.#SkupajZmoremo #ArmedForcesDay #WeAreNATO https://t.co/Td5wAF3FDA | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
We urge UK side to recognize the fact that Hong Kong is now part of China. If UK is bent on changing BNO passport policy unilaterally, it will not only go against its own position & promise but also violate international law & the basic norms governing international relations. https://t.co/k4Bj9xZvUm | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation has published a Report "Promotion and Protection of Family Values in CIS" https://t.co/IFRKbYoGnq https://t.co/ejnVrJtoq9 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
💬 #Zakharova: It is regrettable that, in pursuit of its own selfish goals, #Warsaw completely ignores fair competition principles or the interests of European consumers, essentially undermining European energy and environmental security. #NordStream2 #Poland https://t.co/gplDshloxP | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
It's my pleasure, together with Dr. H. Mahrer, President of the @WKOe, to witness the arrival of the medical equipment from China purchased by the Austrian Federal Economic Chamber. Many thanks to all of both countries for the excellent cooperation in the fight against #COVID19! https://t.co/sFVDg1Xcnk | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
We have launched a public consultation on establishing EU green bonds.
Green bonds will help boost the private sector buy-in that we need to jumpstart a sustainable economic recovery in line with the #EUGreenDeal.
Join the consultation 👇 #SustainableFinance | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
“America believes in REDEMPTION. There is more opportunity, equality, and potential in America today than in any society in the history of the world. We want EVERY CITIZEN to join in our unparalleled success and EVERY COMMUNITY to take part in our extraordinary rise.” | B appeal to commonality - flag waving
M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
.@PolygraphInfo: The Russian state news agency #TASS published Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov’s response to European accusations that Russia has been promoting disinformation about the #COVIDー19 #coronavirus abroad. Read our fact check here https://t.co/3ZqZQYEvTn | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi sets out for Africa. It is the 30th consecutive year that Africa is chosen as the destination for Chinese foreign minister’s first overseas visit of the year. https://t.co/o7cbv4OIhP | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
I will give a speech to Chinese and British business communities on the "Two Sessions", including China's development and China-UK cooperation during and after the pandemic, and take questions from audience.Please follow @AmbLiuXiaoMing live on Twitter from 11:00am GMT on June 9. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
I hope you will enhance confidence in the path, theory, system, and culture of socialism with Chinese characteristics. Strengthen your mind, enrich your experience and grow up to be pillars of the society and work for your country and your people. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
On June 23rd, Ambassador Zhao Yongchen handed over a batch of medical supplies to the Government of Grenada on behalf the Chinese Government. Hon. Peter David, Minister for Foreign Affairs, Hon. Norland Cox, Minister for Youth, Sports, Culture & the Arts attended the ceremony. https://t.co/1GqwjzNLjv | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
We're committed to placing sustainability & citizens' well-being at the💙of our economic strategy. The European Semester, our framework for coordinating economic policies in the 🇪🇺, will play a crucial role. More about the #EuropeanSemester Winter package: https://t.co/svggJ0ue5u https://t.co/id4yeesGNy | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
⛰ The #Soviet #Caucasus was famous all over the #USSR for its #wine, health resorts and colorful, centuries-long local traditions 🍷 People who live there take pride in both their culture & the magnificent surroundings 🍇 Find out more about the region: https://t.co/500srsmAZe https://t.co/GBVh7fxhp8 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
US had a chance to demonstrate if not moral superiority but an understanding of humanitarian values through lifting of extraterritorial sanctions in the situation of #COVID-19. Unfortunately US failed to do that despite a lot of politicians and common people who advocate for that | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
“President Trump is a ratings hit. Since reviving the daily White House briefing Mr. Trump and his coronavirus updates have attracted an average audience of 8.5 million on cable news, roughly the viewership of the season finale of ‘The Bachelor.’ Numbers are continuing to rise... | B appeal to commonality - flag waving |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
@mfa_afghanistan Congrats to Pres. Ghani on his re-election. We respect Afghan people’s choice and call on all parties in Afghanistan to advance peace & reconciliation by building up consensus. China is committed to advancing partnership with Afghanistan. https://t.co/l8O6ytgemr | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Today, the United States is sanctioning 18 major Iranian banks and identifying Iran’s financial sector, further depriving the Islamic Republic of Iran of funds to carry out its support for terrorist activities and nuclear extortion that threatens the world. | B appeal to commonality - flag waving |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Today China was elected as a member of the Human Rights Council for the term 2021-2023 at the election held during the 75th UN General Assembly. China expresses heartfelt gratitude to member states for their support and warmly congratulates other elected members. China will | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
⛳ On 2 August 2007 Russian deep submergence vehicles #Mir1 & #Mir2 reached the seabed under the North Pole for the first time in history. At the depth of 4261 m they planted a rustproof titanium 🇷🇺 Russian flag & left a message capsule for future generations #RussiansDidItFirst https://t.co/g63Mepokg1 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Overseas Chinese Reception 2020 is held in Chinese Embassy on Saturday. Largely attended by over 800. H.E. Ambassador Mr.Yao Jing addressed the reception mentioning that China would work together with Pakistan to build a China-Pakistan Community of Shared Future in the new era https://t.co/tun2QzGTQE | B appeal to commonality - flag waving |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The United States supports the African Continental Free Trade Area #AfCFTA, and we look forward to continuing to partner with the @_AfricanUnion to advance our shared goal of creating economic prosperity. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
We need to stand up for human rights & freedoms, which are under attack.
Peaceful protestors are being beaten or imprisoned, opposition politicians are attacked.
Today, we propose an EU regime to address human rights violations globally, empowering us to sanction perpetrators. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
At the #UNGA 3rd Cmte General Debate, 🇪🇺Amb. @OlofBSkoog called for an independent, objective, impartial & transparent assessment of the issues of concern against #Uighurs & other minorities in Xinjiang & Christians across China.
▶️ https://t.co/qBbmczxDyM https://t.co/69U340ggep | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
On the source of the virus, the difference between China and some U.S. politicians is the distance between truth and lies, and the contrast between science and prejudice. The longer this lie goes, the more history is polluted.
#TwoSessions https://t.co/I9DQvjSraq | B appeal to commonality - flag waving
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Proud to announce an additional $100M of existing funds to support #China in combating the #coronavirus. This commitment – along w/ hundreds of millions generously donated – demonstrates strong U.S. leadership in response to the outbreak. Together we can have a profound impact. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Because of the China Virus, my Campaign, which has raised a lot of money, was forced to spend in order to counter the Fake News reporting about the way we handled it (China Ban, etc.). We did, and are doing, a GREAT job, and have a lot of money left over, much more than 2016.... | |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The Embassy thanks Pakistan's International Cricketer Riffat Ullah Mohmand for his expression of Solidarity with the Chinese people at this difficult time, which demonstrated the rock-solid friendship between China and Pakistan. We will win, and soon, against this challenge. https://t.co/BUuXqJtLUX | M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
My message yesterday during my visit: the EU stands by Ukraine and its people. We are the strongest and the most reliable partner of Ukraine and we will continue to support the reform process, your sovereignty and territorial integrity. https://t.co/2aV1KRpCc0 | M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Freedom of speech 💬
Freedom of the press ✍️
The right to peaceful assembly 📣
The right to petition government 📨📞
These protections are enshrined in the American Constitution and allow us to progress as a nation.
https://t.co/T0QaQAmt8N | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
On June 22, at 4 am the Nazi Germany attacked the Soviet Union and the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945 began. This date is marked as the Day of Memory and Sorrow in @Russia
Read "Shared Responsibility to History and our Future" by President Putin:
⚡️https://t.co/Jw2cmKJDtd #WWII https://t.co/HtJRpqrjtD | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
MFA spox #Zakharova: Russia has repeatedly provided evidence of stable ties between #WhiteHelmets and terrorists, of their crimes and involvement in stage-managed chemical attacks, all of which creates obstacles to #Syria’s return to peaceful life. https://t.co/g6KOngQLOW | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
According to the WHO, more than half of the #COVID-19 vaccines that have entered phase-3 clinical trials were developed by China. This indicates that China has been playing a leading role in the global research and development of COVID-19 vaccines. https://t.co/i1VAtR2PRz | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🗓On April 1, 1873, Sergei #Rachmaninoff, an outstanding composer, #pianist and conductor, was born. The name of this great musician is well-known throughout the world, and his cultural legacy is inexhaustible. https://t.co/ivzdFgaXVb
#Russia #music #culture #SergeiRachmaninoff https://t.co/6dNOxfc7K9 | M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
In 2009, H1N1 flu virus battered the world with US as one of the original sites of the outbreak. It killed 284,000 people worldwide, &WHO declared the flu a PBEIC. However, US failed to adopt effective control measures, causing a worldwide spread of H1N1. https://t.co/LlDPGxLi5Q | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
MFA: Alarmed by killing of Gen Soleimani by US strike in Baghdad. Risk of grave consequences for regional peace and stability. #Iran #Iraq #IRGC #Quds https://t.co/JfYSBGduuR | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Just attended BRICS Foreign Ministry spokespersons’ consultation. We agree to raise the voice of BRICS through coordination! https://t.co/mAhAeJ0U0l | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The world is coming together to defeat the coronavirus.
We have so far raised €5.4 billion in initial funding for affordable and accessible diagnostics, treatments and vaccines.
#UnitedAgainstCoronavirus #GlobalResponse #StrongerTogether https://t.co/bJwaJ1HyCs | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
"My administration stands with every citizen of Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela in their fight for liberty." https://t.co/XS7ckNHnKg | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
FM Wang Yi just had a phonecall with Russian FM Lavrov. FM Wang Yi said military adventurism is unacceptable. He called on Iraq's sovereignty respected, UN Charter observed & regional peace maintained. China&Russia will continue to uphold international justice & peace. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Happy Women’s History Month! This month, we celebrate women’s contributions to their societies and share insights about women’s success in the workforce. Today, let’s explore the Federal Women’s Program at U.S. Embassy Kyiv: https://t.co/98MoJHh5Y7 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🔻
#ICYMI
Statement by President of Russia Vladimir Putin on a comprehensive program of measures for restoring the Russia – US cooperation in the filed of international information security:
🔻
https://t.co/ZrhBd3hHxq #CyberSecurity 🇷🇺🇺🇸 https://t.co/hha6tx4ohF https://t.co/CsXiOMqDMA | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
"I'm moving heaven and earth to safeguard our seniors from the China virus, to deliver lifesaving therapies in record time, and to distribute a safe and effective vaccine before the end of the year."
— President @realDonaldTrump | C discrediting the opponent - name calling
M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#COVID19 | #Russia put forward draft declaration of the #UN member-states on solidarity in countering #coronavirus, which included, inter alia, rejection of trade wars & unilateral sanctions. It failed to be adopted by consensus because of #UK, #US, #EU ➡️https://t.co/BYunrLe5Lk https://t.co/k7HUg9Ghkl | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Study English and American history with us! Join our virtual #EnglishLounge series next Wednesday to learn and talk about the characters, incredible stories, and political events that have influenced American identity and culture. RSVP: https://t.co/OhUxW9n5Wn https://t.co/SzH9ucmKg8 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Meddling into other countries’ internal affairs? What meddling? 🙉🙊🙈 and what if China or Russia highlight credibility problems of Republican party in the US? Or Democratic? Or both?How would it be perceived in the US? Quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi, that’s how US views others https://t.co/5xtQsIOf6x | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Europe and Africa take their partnership to the next level #AUEU The @EU_Commission and the @_AfricanUnion met today to discuss common challenges and opportunities. HRVP @JosepBorrellF will continue his visit in Ethiopia and Sudan https://t.co/rZDhv0zSJg | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#Russia continues to seek from #Germany details on #Navalny medical tests. So far in vain. Without them it’s impossible to establish details of this accident.Against this background intensifying “Russia-did-it” campaign raises a question whether Berlin wants to discover the truth | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#China has no intention to interfere in #US' internal affairs. But just like one can hardly change one's own partner, how could the US daydream about changing a major country like China which has nearly 5 times the size of its population and 20 times the length of its history? | K discrediting the opponent - doubt |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The EU delegation is honored to support & join Prime Minister Imran Khan’s initative for tree planting across #Pakistan 🌳 🌳
We all have a duty to act & responsibility to fight climate change!
#PlantWithTigersForce
@AKaminara @eu_eeas @PMCOVIDForce @ImranKhanPTI https://t.co/of4JPgYRbG | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🔴 Watch live online! 🇷🇺🇺🇳 Sergey Lavrov addresses the High-Level Segment opening the 43rd Human Rights Council. #Russia #Lavrov #Diplomacy #UN https://t.co/GqWa7IiSpT | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Though miles apart, our hearts are connected. Always! CCCUK and Chinese companies in the UK are raising fund and collecting medical materials, to help the motherland fight against #Coronavirus. Life-saving equipments most needed. Sleepless volunteers. https://t.co/y0hL3PjhEN | M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
MFA Spokeswoman #Zakharova on new EU sanctions vs Russia: We warned our colleagues in Brussels & other European capitals more than once that the EU’s stubborn intention to hold Russia responsible for Mr.Navalny’s alleged poisoning will be the litmus test of our further relations https://t.co/CBwrTOFI3r | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
📺 #OTD in 1984 #Soviet TV #spy series ‘TASS Is Authorized to Declare...’ premiered 🕵️♀️ Set in the #ColdWar era, it portrays the struggle of Soviet & #American intelligence agencies. It has the lot: CIA, KGB, moles, agents, and more ℹ️ BTW, @tassagency_en is a real news outlet 📣 https://t.co/XF0AyughhK | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Secretary #Pompeo claims moral superiority of the #US over China, saying the US secures more freedom for its citizens. Is that so? Like the emperor in his "new clothes" lost in a world by himself. Please give Floyd & other African Americans the freedom to breathe first. | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Great #EU films at the @DiliFilmFest October 1-11 in #TimorLeste ➡️https://t.co/GZH3ALHs64
#European cinema makes us happy!
Discover #EuropeanCommission's programme for culture & audiovisual: https://t.co/DxYEDkLJKS
@Andrew_JacobsEU 🇪🇺 #EuropeForCulture https://t.co/C0YMAlxf0L | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Today the College of Commissioners adopted the 1st European Climate Law. It puts in legislation our target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2050. It will be our compass for the next 30 years & will guide us as we build a sustainable new growth model. #EUGreenDeal | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Today is a day for hope. After years of conflict, we have signed an agreement with the Taliban that achieves US objectives and puts Afghanistan on a path to peace. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
321 civil society groups from 60+ countries press the United Nations to create an independent international mechanism to address the Chinese government’s worsening repression including in Hong Kong, Tibet & Xinjiang & Beijing's attack on global standards. https://t.co/K9Wk2lHPIG https://t.co/9UdtpzoXXN | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
We will set up a new European Bauhaus – a co-creation space where architects, artists, students, engineers, designers work together to make that happen.
#NextGenerationEU #EUGreenDeal #SOTEU https://t.co/djXlWlO3Kq | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Today marks five years since Iran arrested Siamak Namazi, an innocent man, simply for being a U.S. citizen. Siamak, his father Baquer, and Morad Tahbaz shouldn't spend another day detained. Iran needs to end this immoral practice and let them come home now. #FreeTheNamazis | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The Chinese medical and custom experts held a video conference to share their experience in fighting against #COVID19 with their counterparts from 18 Asian and European countries. Nepali friends attended the conference and made good contribution to it. https://t.co/9puRImqhID | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
.@SecPompeo: We know that our system is more attractive to others. People want to be connected to the United States of America. They want to join with us freely because they know that we stand for freedom alongside them. https://t.co/dgyc4VtjyX | B appeal to commonality - flag waving |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
If you're not hungry now, you might be after watching Perry's video about the state of Louisiana! Home to New Orleans, Louisiana is in the American South and offers a fascinating history and mix of cultures. #KnowMyState https://t.co/yUC0OAx5pu | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Follow live tomorrow at 12:00 CET the press conference by President @vonderleyen, Commissioners @JanezLenarcic @SKyriakidesEU @YlvaJohansson @AdinaValean and @PaoloGentiloni on the EU’s response to #COVID19 which will take place at the EU Emergency Response Coordination Centre. https://t.co/6QGfSwJsdD | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The United States has paid Iraq Billions of Dollars a year, for many years. That is on top of all else we have done for them. The people of Iraq don’t want to be dominated &, controlled by Iran, but ultimately, that is their choice. Over the last 15 years, Iran has gained more.... | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
It is important that China and Europe respect, appreciate, learn from and support each other. China and Europe should work together to translate the diversity and differences in our world into vitality and impetus for further progress. https://t.co/bfjVJ6F3aH | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Former Amnesty International staffer Brian Kern pretended to be HG local journalist Kong Tsung-gan, taught at #HongKong school, took active part in protests. You still beleive Western meddling in #HongKongProtests and other similar anti-gov unrests is a conspiracy theory? 🙈🙉🙊 https://t.co/lzlxY6ilWB | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The US is fully responsible for any legitimate action China will take in response,including targeting relevant individuals,and for the damage it has done to bilateral coordination and cooperation on major regional and international issues. https://t.co/65pISHbCd6 | E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
@StateDept We condemn US "personnel cap" on Chinese media—de-facto expulsion. Another step of political oppression and evidence of hypocrisy in US freedom of press. Prejudice and exclusion against Chinese media. | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
It is a sad moment and I believe it is a loss both for Europe and for the UK. Yet, I am sure that the EU and the UK stand on the same European values and we can remain good partners. It is a story about old friends and new beginnings. #BrexitDay https://t.co/XVsht7HjuJ | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
.@SecPompeo emphasized NATO Alliance unity on a broad range of shared priorities when he spoke today with @NATO Secretary General @jensstoltenberg. The United States values continued strong Transatlantic cooperation. https://t.co/1whC0h5P3k | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
⚓️Today 🇷🇺#Russia celebrates the Shipbuilder’s day. #OTD in 1⃣6⃣6⃣7⃣ frigate⛵️ «Orel» (Eagle) was laid down, first #Russian state ordered warship built. Hundreds of thousands of men and women in Russia are involved in the shipbuilding industry🚢 https://t.co/ecXvFbiBnf | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🆕 #RuleofLaw Report is of particular importance for EU-@coe joint action in the field: it reinforces established rule of law standards, creates coherence around a rule of law culture in Europe & sends a strong signal of commitment for our shared values ⚖️
https://t.co/ZAfyza4G1a | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
.@SecPompeo: When we say that #Iran is the leading destabilizing force in the Middle East and throughout the world, it’s because of this terror activity that they have now spread as a cancer all across the globe. https://t.co/skuB6pLKDL | C discrediting the opponent - name calling |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
We are doing everything we can to support health workers.
Hospitals, doctors and nurses need quality medical equipment and it must remain affordable.
Take a look at our action for the health sector here → https://t.co/Mme1z9j0QN #coronavirus https://t.co/kFjOPA5vMh | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
A translation from American: truth or not, Russia is to blame! 🙈🙉🙊 What an easy life mainstream US journalists have! #BountyGate #Afghanistan https://t.co/rqZDvdgI6I | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism |
Subsets and Splits