text
stringlengths 524
26.6k
| response
stringlengths 0
389
|
|---|---|
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
A new partnership was launched today between the European Union, @UNICEFPacific and the Government of Kiribati to provide improved access to water, sanitation & better hygiene for communities living in the most remote islands in Kiribati. 🇪🇺🇰🇮
Read more: https://t.co/uEgtbvKsJu https://t.co/wQN43QCx8D | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#Lukashevich: We consider as a manifestation of unreasonable cruelty the targeted spraying of pepper aerosol in the face of RIA Novosti correspondent M. Turgiev and firing by rubber bullets at @SputnikInt producer N.Roussel by #US police despite their clear #press identification https://t.co/fFjHup0XhG | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
1/2 Discussing #Venezuela #COVID response in a closed VTC of UNSC Members asked by #Western countries today. The country is sofar doing better than many of #LatinAmerica countries so the discussion was very artificial. #OCHA briefing was balanced, but #US, #EU and #UK launched.. https://t.co/rm9nAhOyO7 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Three officers were likely left permanently blinded by rioters using lasers pointed directly at their eyes.
These are not the actions of peaceful protesters. President Trump has a sworn duty to uphold the laws of the United States—and he will. https://t.co/WBy0Z4lIo5 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
I stand with survivors & all who have lost loved ones to terrorist atrocities. Extremists that sow hatred & division have no place in our Union.
To protect everyone in Europe, the EU is tough on terrorists & the drivers of terrorism. #SurvivingTerrorism | M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Women’s rights in #Iran have regressed since the Iranian regime came into power in 1979. We stand with the women in Iran in their struggle for a better future. https://t.co/OTOFYK8fi0 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
One of key values of Chinese civilization is peace. From ancient time, our forefathers advocate harmonious society. We hold peace very dear. We abide by the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence. Hope those US politicians could understand Chinese history better. https://t.co/Dua5DICreL | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Xi Jinping Thought on Diplomacy embodies a creative transformation and development of traditional Chinese values by drawing extensively from the Chinese culture and enriching it with a new spirit of the times and a commitment to human progress. #Somalia | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#LikeAndShare Russian cosmonaut Oleg Artemyev took a picture of #Mumbai from space https://t.co/JkDHPfZSyA | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
.@SecPompeo: We're pushing back on Chinese [Communist Party] propaganda efforts here at home. We simply want to ensure the American people can differentiate between news written by a free press, and propaganda distributed by the Chinese Communist Party. https://t.co/sid2ORcSkd | F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Today we wish the @UN a Happy 75th Anniversary! Born from the same 🌱 seeds, sharing the same values, the 🇪🇺 EU reaffirms its support to the UN system as the world urges for us to #BuildBackBetter, together! https://t.co/o9SWvkT00t https://t.co/6Zj8kVR9en | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Met with @gantzbe and @Gabi_Ashkenazi in Jerusalem to discuss our effort to address Iran's malign influence and the importance of forging peace with Israel’s neighbors such as in the historic Abraham Accords. As always, the U.S. supports Israel and is committed to its security. https://t.co/dL24XX5YSZ | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
President @realDonaldTrump re-activated the White House Council on Native American Affairs to promote economic development and rural prosperity in Indian Country. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Bin Laden was a freedom fighter according to the same CIA that just invented the story that #Russia is paying the Taliban to kill #US troops in Afghanistan. https://t.co/zh9c8avQl4 | F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
I wonder if the Chinese side sends a #US media an article filled with lies and malicious smears, demands reply by next day and asks for publishing without revision, can any US media possibly agree? | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Russian pro-Kremlin media have launched an intense disinformation campaign in western countries to undermine public trust in healthcare systems.
The EU has found 80 cases of COVID-19-related disinfo since Jan 22
More from @FT
https://t.co/mgD1Hg5Q08 | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Great conversation with Singaporean Foreign Minister @VivianBala today to discuss our desire to uphold international law in the South China Sea and promote stability and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
☎️ On May 20 Sergey #Lavrov had a telephone conversation with Minister for Foreign Affairs of Australia @MarisePayne. They discussed topical aspects of #Russian-#Australian relations with emphasis on the pragmatic development of their cooperation. https://t.co/7RZOizu8XM https://t.co/wpurvCdEHT | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
MFA spox #Zakharova: US threats of sanctions against #NordStream2 is part of policy to weaken European competitiveness and to secure purchases of American liquified gas. That's what they call market economy. https://t.co/ExeHXsQgrn | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🚢 #OTD On 17 August 1977 legendary Soviet nuclear-powered icebreaker #Arktika reached the #NorthPole - first of any surface ships.
The pioneers placed ⛳ Soviet flag with the banner-pole of the #Sedov Arctic expedition who perished in attempt to reach the #NorthPole in 1914 🕯️ https://t.co/klQf9W1NSk | B appeal to commonality - flag waving
M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
We will faithfully deliver our promise of making Chinese #vaccines a global public good, actively take part in multilateral cooperation on vaccine research, and contribute to the accessibility and affordability of vaccines in all developing countries. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
During today's meeting with HE Ambassador @ahmadjavid of #Afghanistan we discussed the recent launch of the Afghan peace process. The EU welcomes these negotiations and I expressed my hope to witness a new peaceful chapter in the history of Afghanistan. https://t.co/4dRp3IDhJ5 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
No nation that desires a peaceful Middle East should contemplate arms sales with Iran - every weapon the regime buys will be at the disposal of its radical ideology. We are prepared to use domestic authorities to sanction individuals or entities contributing to these arms sales. | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🛰️ #OTD in 1995 - 2⃣5⃣ years - 🇺🇸 US Shuttle #Atlantis docked with 🇷🇺 Russian space station #Mir. An important milestone in history of human space missions and a vivid exmaple of fruitful cooperation. 10 cosmonauts & astronauts in Earth orbit simultaneously - space got crowded https://t.co/f6FXOafZyV | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Ambassador Brian A. Nichols discusses U.S. gov support to the people of Zimbabwe and the future of U.S.-Zimbabwe relations.
https://t.co/GkJ7HIiLAn | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
What does Europe mean to you? To mark #EuropeDay we asked people in the UK and this is what @fergalkeane47 said...
#1minute4EU https://t.co/GSVnhagQA2 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
In order to support the peaceful reconstruction and development of #Somalia, Chinese side is organizing the supply of goods, providing more than 30 water tankers, oil tankers, 80000 sets of police uniforms, police boots and caps,etc. to Somalia, agreements are being signed. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
....targeted 52 Iranian sites (representing the 52 American hostages taken by Iran many years ago), some at a very high level &, important to Iran &, the Iranian culture, and those targets, and Iran itself, WILL BE HIT VERY FAST AND VERY HARD. The USA wants no more threats! | H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
.@SecPompeo: Russia must end its repression of those who oppose its occupation, release unjustly imprisoned Ukrainians, and return full control of the Peninsula to Ukraine. Crimea is Ukraine. https://t.co/Z98BMbnplB | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Happening today: President @realDonaldTrump is signing an executive order to "authorize economic sanctions on employees of the International Criminal Court (ICC) for pursuing investigations into U.S. military and intelligence personnel at Russia’s behest." https://t.co/qTKEBMjMll | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Emblematic of the long history of U.S. support to @BWGovernment's #HIV response, @UMBaltimore recently partnered with @UBBotswana to offer a ‘Public Health and Differentiated Care Models for HIV Services’ course for students from both countries. Read more: https://t.co/LrtJQO5ciw https://t.co/FknL2TP5lj | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The EU and the Republic of Korea are strategic partners, particularly when it comes to relaunching sustainable and inclusive economies. 🇪🇺 🇰🇷
This week leaders spoke via videoconference about #coronavirus, trade and more.
More: https://t.co/ADrGGkqnr0 https://t.co/8fmw0S7frU | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
"The EU and India are the world's largest democracies. We must work even more closely to promote and protect our shared interests, based on multilateralism, the rule of law, and human rights."
Statement by President @vonderleyen following the EU-India videoconference 👇 #EUIndia | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
China congratulates H.E. Volkan Bozkir @volkan_bozkir on his election as President of #UNGA75.
We believe that under his leadership, #UNGA will strengthen solidarity and cooperation, uphold multilateralism and carry forward the purposes and principles of the UN Charter. https://t.co/k0mIOrgAyL | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Making Europe more resilient and inclusive in the future means investing in people now.
EU social funds will play a major role in the green and digital transitions to ensure that no one is left behind.
More: https://t.co/CiIBQfPJxz #NextGenerationEU https://t.co/NgnHUDl0Th | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
"Dawn of new era": #BrexitDay was marked with both celebrations and protests across Britain, leaving the EU in mixed feeling and the remaining EU members calling for stronger solidarity within the bloc.
Read today's Xinhua Headlines: https://t.co/DxrV04pQFo https://t.co/xLtb9AmVV6 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
💬#Zakharova: We firmly refute the latest #FakeNews planted by our Anglo-Saxon pseudo-friends from the #US, #Canada and #Britain regarding the alleged hacking attack to steal Western #COVID19 #vaccine data. https://t.co/Qz4SoLXXBZ | C discrediting the opponent - name calling
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
During their phone conversation Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump have expressed deep concerns over the spread of the coronavirus across the world, and have agreed to look into ways to boost cooperation on fighting #COVID19
Read more ➡️ https://t.co/vLmvynp2JO 🇷🇺🇺🇸 https://t.co/xsBm6objMv | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#WangYi at 10th EAS FMs Meeting: The #US has become the biggest driver of militarization of the South China Sea & the most dangerous factor damaging peace in the area. The US has interfered with the efforts of #China & @ASEAN countries to resolve disputes through consultation. https://t.co/BRcnAbnooV | C discrediting the opponent - name calling
M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
A special honour to close today’s formal launch of Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan. An emotional moment full of hope and determination. The European way is about values and dignity and that is what any policy to fight cancer should build on. #EUCancerPlan #WorldCancerDay https://t.co/mIToEnjQfR | B appeal to commonality - flag waving |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Chinese State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi had a phone talk with British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab. He urged UK to respect China's legitimate right to safeguard national securtiy in Hong Kong. https://t.co/7tTDPQyaDf | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
2/2) EU long-term partnership with Somalia is inserted in the gradual implementation of a participatory, democratic system. In this sense, March 2021 option seems technically more realistic, financially more cost-effective and better aligned with agreed principles https://t.co/S9kpRdcZz4 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Thank you, Secretary-General @antonioguterres, for standing in solidarity with the Chinese people at this crucial moment.
https://t.co/RIFtMQm2eD https://t.co/NAyu9y7320 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🇪🇺🇬🇧 By putting forward this Bill, the UK has seriously damaged trust between the EU and the UK. It is now up to the UK government to re-establish that trust.
My statement following today's extraordinary Joint Committee on the #WithdrawalAgreement👇
https://t.co/fiRyTxVNQD | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
This election is a simple choice: If Biden Wins, China Wins. When WE Win, YOU WIN, Pennsylvania WINS, and America WINS! https://t.co/dgx92ZxsBO | B appeal to commonality - flag waving
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Congratulations to Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who last night took her Constitutional Oath to become the fifth woman to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court.
https://t.co/FcJH0jrZfO | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
President Xi Jinping: The Chinese people will never allow attempts by anyone or any forces to distort the history of the Communist Party of China and vilify its nature and mission. #CPC #China | A appeal to commonality - ad populum |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
@EsperDoD claims "China wants to rewrite the rules of the international order." Well, China always upholds the international order. We only want to rewrite the old pattern of "seeking hegemony when growing stronger" into peaceful development & win-win cooperation. https://t.co/4A4sLONMQr | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
In pics: Hezhe people, one of the smallest #ethnic minority groups in China who used to live by fishing and hunting, are now embracing prosperity as they develop various industries while keeping alive their #culture and heritage.
https://t.co/AE8Rpj63vi https://t.co/gLA1vtOhAM | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
1/3 We abstained on #Syria cross-border mechanism draft because we are disappointed how the penholders conducted the whole process. We could have arrived to this result earlier. One most important crossing point to #Idlib is what #Russia was proposing since the beginning | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The United States joins the DRC in celebrating their 60th anniversary of independence. As we mark six decades of friendship between our countries, we affirm our commitment to our Privileged Partnership for Peace and Prosperity and to continue to fight COVID-19 and Ebola together. https://t.co/1i5Zbcykbb | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The U.S. is alarmed by reports of military action along the Line of Contact between Armenia and Azerbaijan. We extend our condolences to the families of those killed and injured. We remain committed to helping the sides achieve a peaceful settlement. https://t.co/ktpz9QG2R7 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
In an open, transparent and responsible manner, China has shared the full genetic sequence of the virus in a record-short time and shared its experience with other countries including the UK without reservation. https://t.co/FIX2UlMlZj | B appeal to commonality - flag waving |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
A warm welcome to @ITCnews's new Executive Director @CokeHamilton! We are looking forward to our continued close cooperation in supporting micro, small & medium entreprises #MSMEs in #digitalisation, green growth & #recovery, with ITC as a trusted & valued partner of the EU 🇪🇺🤝 https://t.co/Xz8Dj4zH3o | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
💬 #Zakharova: We call on the international community not to ignore the legal chaos in #Ukraine and urge #Kiev to comply with its obligations in the #HumanRights sphere, including ensuring the legal rights and freedoms of its #Russian-speaking citizens. https://t.co/JyJJQ1DB5L | M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
"The United States is honored to present two excellent choices to Finland. The HX program is a special opportunity to advance the already strong partnership between the United States and Finland." - Ambassador Pence #HXChallenge #HXhanke #f35 #lockheedmartin https://t.co/Ge77L5lTyf https://t.co/DaC9vzMUI2 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
💬 Legendary sniper Lyudmila #Pavlichenko was a direct person . When she visited the #US in 1942 she asked the Americans (referring to Second Front delays): I am 25 & have already eliminated 309 Nazis. Don't you think, gentlemen, you have been hiding behind my back long enough? https://t.co/6msMf2iMu0 | M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Russia will send humanitarian assistance to #Lebanon and specialists to tackle #COVID19 outbreak. We stand side by side with our Lebanese friends at this terrible moment which more than ever requires depoliticised global solidarity #LebanonExplosion #Beirut #BeirutExplosion https://t.co/YYExt2TM9q | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Today, the U.S. targeted a network connected to Russian operative Yevgeniy Prigozhin working to advance Russia’s malign influence in the Central African Republic, Libya, and beyond. We will continue to promote accountability for those who support Russian malign activities. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
We are working non-stop to provide people with a safe and effective vaccine against #coronavirus as quickly as possible.
Today's contract signature with @AstraZeneca will allow the purchase of the vaccine for all EU countries: https://t.co/hWsDSSsUJc
#StrongerTogether https://t.co/9z1Yf6uVHp | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
A clear indication of what we can expect if we support “rules based intl order” and not intl law. Extra judicial exterritorial killings and despise of UN. A clear alert to those who still obediently follow US shepherds #Soleimani #Iran https://t.co/FpKbWvJNLH | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The EU & US are closely watching @Kabmin_UA_e appointments of high-level officials in the Tax and Customs Service. It is important to follow fair, merit-based competitive procedures and not risk long-term reforms, supported by international partners. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The United States is Ukraine's long-term partner in keeping Ukraine healthy! https://t.co/tQvKt0Jisp | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#DYK during the #WWII the Soviet Embassy in Washington, DC issued #InformationBulletin. 75 years #OTD it reported about:
⭐️ Friendly meetings between Russian & American troops
⭐️ Modern American Music at Tchaikovsky Hall in Moscow:
🎶 Porgy and Bess
▶️ https://t.co/XxMhx3lysh https://t.co/DCqZw36PSj | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
In the absence of solid evidence, some in the #UK have been following the #US in discriminating against & cracking down on Chinese companies under the pretext of security risks. https://t.co/HMPyseoBEc | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
❗ The @UN Security Council has not taken any action to reinstate the foregone #sanctions on #Iran. We hope that our #US colleagues will have the courage to finally look the truth in the eye and stop speaking on behalf of the Security Council. https://t.co/i17PMLZz4l https://t.co/LZb60xaR31 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Some people are clamoring for so-called "accountability and compensation" from a victim of #COVID19 and fabricating so-called "evidence" for frivolous lawsuits. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Congratulations to #Hyderabad-based startups Heamac Healthcare (@IITHyderabad) & Oncoseekbio (@HydUniv) for winning @INDOUSSTF grants to partner with U.S. researchers & develop innovative technologies. I am proud to see #USIndia collaboration in the global fight against #COVID19. https://t.co/GBdLg5is7a | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Meeting with my team at our missions overseas is one of the best parts of my job. This team works to advance U.S. interests with Denmark by promoting our shared democratic values. Congrats @usambdenmark on your team’s success and to reopening a Consulate amid COVID-19. https://t.co/AMJIXHfFsY | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Very happy to welcome @INDOPACOM Commander Admiral Davidson to Australia this week! A sign of the strength of the alliance between our two countries, and the U.S. commitment to Australia and the #IndoPacific 🇺🇸🇦🇺#USwithAUS https://t.co/QrmOBMftiv | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Our first 🇪🇺 coordination meeting with the Association of EU students & researchers and science & research attachés of EU embassies in the UK in taking place now. We are discussing academic and research cooperation after Brexit & the situation of EU students. https://t.co/OtnRGJaePZ | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
A lot of inaccurate information, myths and disinformation are currently circulating around the #Coronavirus outbreak. Spreading disinformation is playing with people’s lives. #FAC https://t.co/mMsSW8v5ea | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
A Poll in today’s New York Post says that 77% of “U.S. adults have confidence in their government’s ability to handle the Coronavirus (Number One), compared to other health threats.” 64% for Zika, 58% for Ebola. Others way down on list. Our professionals are doing a great job! | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The bipartisan Coronavirus aid package the House approved includes:
✔️Free tests for Americans who should be tested
✔️Paid Sick & Family Medical Leave for those that need it
✔️Ensures students receiving school meals still get them
✔️Protections & relief for small businesses https://t.co/bh8CVJgJJb | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The U.S. Embassy Kyiv team is pleased to welcome Secretary of State Pompeo to Ukraine for meetings with Ukrainian leaders and Embassy staff! https://t.co/8lM1feXJKt | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🎉🇷🇺🇰🇮Today is the 30th anniversary of diplomatic relations between #Russia and #Kiribati.
🇷🇺🇰🇮We believe, that realization of great potential of bilateral cooperation in various fields fully meets the interests of the people of Russia & Kiribati.
🔗 https://t.co/WkOHhVfaOB https://t.co/zYZCl1YrGB | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Glad to see my team of commissioners back and getting ready for the intense months ahead.
We are discussing fresh ideas for:
◾️Protecting citizens and our economies in #COVID19 times
◾️Leading the green and digital transitions
◾️Making Europe stronger in the 🌎 https://t.co/nnE1KxblwQ | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The #EU 🇪🇺 In Ghana 🇬🇭 welcomes 2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣0️⃣ with open arms 🤲🤲🤲, celebrating the unity in diversity!
We are looking forward to continue the cooperation with our partners through the year‼️
Together 👫👭👬 we are stronger 💪💪🏿 in the promotion of development 🤩 https://t.co/K4oV6n1NXX | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Today in Ghana-U.S. History - Newly-appointed Ambassador of Ghana to the U.S, Miguel Augustus Ribeiro, presents his credentials to President John F. Kennedy (in rocking chair) in the Oval Office, White House, Washington, D.C. on 25 April 1963. #USinGhana https://t.co/vFDrwrNfmK | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
💬 #Lavrov: It is symbolic that a Russia-Greece Year of #History planned for 2021 will coincide with the celebrations dedicated to the 200th anniversary of the beginning of the Greek War of #Independence. #Russia #Greece https://t.co/5nWyO2RwoT https://t.co/B1heLCvfn2 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
I am pleased to announce the U.S. has made available nearly $274 million in emergency health and humanitarian funding. Our leadership in the #coronavirus response is another example of how America continues to be the world’s greatest humanitarians. | B appeal to commonality - flag waving
M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
“In Europe, e.g., we have 17 different types of tank. The US has one”, said French minister @florence_parly in @EP_Defence today talking about EU´s need to mutualize the costs of its defence industry.
Watch the video recording of the meeting
📽️ https://t.co/Qt5qUaGVVh https://t.co/X0PdeFtLA7 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Today is #WorldArtDay!
While at home, you can still be close to culture:
🚂 Explore European heritage sites
📜 See glimpses of history
🎵 Experience Mozart & Puccini
& much more.
Navigate through European cultures from your couch↓
https://t.co/gyPphdAmhR
#CreativeEuropeAtHome | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
President @realDonaldTrump on the Abraham Accords: I see a lot of countries coming in fairly quickly. And when you have them all in, ultimately, Iran will come in too. There’ll be peace in the Middle East. https://t.co/hff5k92iqO | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
.@USAmbOSCE: We join our European and other partners in affirming that our eastern Ukraine-related sanctions against #Russia will remain in place until Russia fully implements its Minsk commitments. https://t.co/nqVWZYa6Xs | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Kill whatever you don't like or fear whatever is better than yours. Does this speak for the entire American people or just the logic of a few of US politicians?
https://t.co/2O00TMkfts | K discrediting the opponent - doubt |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
No more funding will be provided until the World Health Organization’s failures and cover-ups during the Coronavirus pandemic are investigated. https://t.co/Mi6QcsDDd9 | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
Negotiations between the EU 🇪🇺 and the UK 🇬🇧 on future cooperation will need to conclude soon if there is to be an agreement before the end of the transition period. Find out more about the talks and how they work → https://t.co/Q5dSV5vmj2 https://t.co/LSl3H79Bcm | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The iron brothers of Pakistan and China always stay thick and thin. On the back-ground of the changes unseen in a century, this all weather friendship and cooperation will further enhanced. #CPEC #Gwadarproofficial #ChinaZindabad #PakistanZindabad https://t.co/zSZrbHjiGx | M loaded language |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
May is Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month. Here is some inspiration from #FilAm Chaplain Leah Boling from the @HiAirGuard to help us get through these trying times. #AAPIHM #COVID19 #COVID19PH #coronavirus https://t.co/ao8YoKYEcE | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#Galway2020 European Capital of Culture has today announced its reimagined programme 🎉
More than 350 local and national artists will be involved in the 7 month programme which runs from September 2020 to March 2021 @galway2020
Details here ➡️ https://t.co/KKYgBeCOkA https://t.co/PzYYWTvEUT | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
💬 #Zakharova: It is well known that #Russia🇷🇺 supplied arms only to #Afghanistan’s 🇦🇫 lawful government.
❗ If our #US 🇺🇸 colleagues want to talk in these terms, it would be appropriate to recall reports on #US security services supporting ISIS fighters. https://t.co/4EojCe506N | D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The American Chamber in Hong Kong stated its commitment to HK as a home base for intl business. China welcomes operation and development of foreign companies in HK, and hopes the business community can work with others to add more glory to the city. https://t.co/OoGXSOdqOf | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The world must be vigilant and take action to prevent Iran from acquiring proliferation-sensitive items that further threaten regional stability and security. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
#Nebenzia: Russia partners with #UN 🇺🇳 in training foreign #women-peacekeepers in certified training centers, incl. the center in #Domodedovo, subordinated to the Ministry of Internal Affairs. The share of women among 🇷🇺peacekeepers in @UNPeacekeeping operations stands at ~17%. https://t.co/SYiRMwhqVL | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
The U.S. government took another step to protect U.S. national security and the integrity of 5G networks. We will not tolerate efforts by the Chinese Communist Party to undermine the privacy of our citizens or the integrity of 5G networks worldwide. https://t.co/NXONCd9kpl | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
I had an interview with Kosmos Radio today and emphasized the importance of international solidarity and introduced some specific measures China has taken to assist Africa in the fight against COVID-19. | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🇪🇺 EU leaders on the attacks in France: "We stand united and firm in our solidarity with France, with the French people and the Government of France – in our common and continued fight against terrorism and violent extremism." #Nice #EUCO | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
In these difficult times, international cooperation is crucial.
Taiwan has donated medical masks to the European Union and we are coordinating its distribution to all EU countries.
One million is on its way to Spain and Italy.
#StrongerTogether https://t.co/iVAxWNJBUP | P not propaganda |
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as:
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following.
A. Appeal to commonality - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people."
B. Appeal to commonality - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution."
C. Discrediting the opponent - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability"
D. Discrediting the opponent - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards"
E. Discrediting the opponent - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties."
F. Discrediting the opponent - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world."
G. Discrediting the opponent - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer."
H. Discrediting the opponent - Fear Appeals: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences."
I. Discrediting the opponent - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!"
J. Discrediting the opponent - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!"
K. Discrediting the opponent - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?"
L. Discrediting the opponent - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!"
M. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!"
N. Appeal to Authority - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!"
O. Appeal to Authority - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable."
If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda.
After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, unless if none of options A-O applies, choose option P:
A appeal to commonality - ad populum
B appeal to commonality - flag waving
C discrediting the opponent - name calling
D discrediting the opponent - undiplomatic assertiveness/whataboutism
E discrediting the opponent - scapegoating
F discrediting the opponent - propaganda slinging
G discrediting the opponent - personal attacks
H discrediting the opponent - fear appeals
I discrediting the opponent - absurdity appeal
J discrediting the opponent - demonization
K discrediting the opponent - doubt
L discrediting the opponent - reductio ad hitlerum
M loaded language
N appeal to authority - appeal to false authority
O appeal to authority - bandwagoning
P not propaganda
Tweet:
🗓 On July 11, 2006, Russia and the Principality of Monaco established diplomatic relations. The friendly cooperation between the two countries is advancing dynamically 🇷🇺🇲🇨 https://t.co/bWyq1n3qVM #Russia #Monaco https://t.co/xJ5Mnr60pw | P not propaganda |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.